HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/07/2015•.•
::::
•" Meeting Location: Municipal Center
City of Apple 7100 147th Street West
Valley Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124
May 7, 2015
PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE
INFORMAL MEETING TENTATIVE DISCUSSION ITEMS
6:00 p.m.
1. Committee Discussion Items 10 minutes
2. Park Usage 10 minutes
3. 14& Street Crosswalks 10 minutes
4. Staff Items 10 minutes
5. Adjourn
PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE
REGULAR MEETING TENTATIVE AGENDA
7:00 p.m.
1. Call to Order
2. Approval of the Agenda 5 minutes
3. Audience— 10 Minutes Total Time Limit —For Items Not on this Agenda 10 minutes
4. Approval of the March 2015 Minutes 5 minutes
5. Agenda Items
A. Ordinance Amending Park Hours 10 minutes
B. Proposed Amendments to Park Dedication Requirements 10 minutes
C. Kelley Park Amenities Discussion 15 minutes
D. Cedar Isle Park Organized Field Use 10 minutes
E. Quarry Point Park Soccer Field #7 Lighting 10 minutes
F. Parks and Recreation Division Reports 15 minutes
G. Accept Resignation of Committee Member Cindy Hart 10 minutes
6. Adjourn
NEXT REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETINGS - Tentative:
Thursday July 16, 2015 6:00 p.m. (Informal) — Park Tour
" " 7:00 p.m. (Regular)
Thursday September 3, 2015 6:00 p.m. (Informal)
" " 7:00 p.m. (Regular)
Regular meetings are broadcast, live, on Charter Communications Cable Channel 180.
(Agendas and meeting minutes are also available on the City's Internet Web Site
www. cityofapplevalley. org)
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE
March 5, 2015
Minutes of the March 5, 2015, Apple Valley Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee.
PRESENT: Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee Chair Lee Strom; Committee
Secretary Patrick Sullivan; Committee Members, Noel Hammill, Brenton Schulz,
and Boyd Montgomery; Parks and Recreation Director Barry Bernstein; Parks
Superintendent Tom Adamini; Recreation Superintendent Scott Breuer;
Valleywood Golf Course Manager Jim Zinck; Arena Manager Brian Christianson;
Department Assistant Dorene Perkins Monn; one student observer.
ABSENT: Kanika Gupta and Cindy Hart
ITEM 1. Committee Chair Strom called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m.
ITEM 2. Approval of Agenda
MOTION: by Hammill, seconded by Montgomery to approve the agenda as
presented
VOTE: Yes — 5, No — 0
Audience — 10 Minutes Total Time Limit — For Items Not on the Agenda
Chair Strom invited anyone present wishing to bring an item not on the agenda up for
discussion to please step forward.
No one stepped forward.
ITEM 4. Approval of the January 2015, Minutes.
MOTION: by Schulz, seconded by Hammill, to approve the January 15, 2015,
meeting minutes as presented.
VOTE: Yes — 5, No — 0
ITEM 5.A. Agenda Items — Park Dedication Expenditure
Parks Superintendent Adamini requested support of staff authorization to expend Park
Dedication funds in the amount of $40,000 for the installation of a sanitary sewer connection
at Quarry Point Park.
-lof2-
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE
March 5, 2015
MOTION: by Hammill, seconded by Sullivan, recommending staff
authorization to expend Park Dedication Funds for the purpose of a
sanitary sewer connection for Quarry Point Park
VOTE: Yes — 5, No — 0
ITEM 5.11. Agenda Items — Parks & Recreation Department Annual Report - 2014
Staff members individually reviewed highlights of their division's section of the year-end
report.
ITEM 5.C. Agenda Items — Election of Committee Officers
By majority vote of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee, Lee Strom was
elected Chair and Patrick Sullivan was elected Secretary.
ITEM 6. Adjourn
There being no further business, the Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee meeting was
adjourned.
MOTION: by Hammill, seconded by Sullivan, to adjourn the meeting at 7:43
p.m.
VOTE: Yes — 5, No — 0
Respectfully Submitted,
Doaeare PerAw NO"
Dorene Perkins Mono, Dept. Assistant
Approved by the Apple Valley Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee 2015.
-2of2-
•••
.*::0
•
*00 ITEM:
City of Apple COUNCIL MEETING DATE: May 7, 2015
Valley SECTION: Regular Agenda
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Ordinance Amending Park Hours
STAFF CONTACT: DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:
Barry Bernstein, Director Parks and Recreation Department
Action Requested
Motion Issuing Recommendation Regarding Park Hours
Summary
An amendment to Chapter 95, Section 95.04 regulating park hours has been proposed to allow for
earlier park access. Staff is seeking Committee recommendation as to whether the park hours
should remain as presently posted or the draft amendment should proceed to Council.
Background
Proposed amendment language for the park hours in the City ordinance has been developed (see
attached). This revision was motivated primarily due to persons who enter or utilize a park prior to
the 7:00 a.m. park hour restriction. These people may be walkers or people who walk their pet.
By ordinance, these people would currently be considered violators and could be cited for an
ordinance violation. The proposed revision is intended to clean up the language in the ordinance to
allow for such activity in our parks.
Budget Impact
N/A
Attachment(s)
Ordinance Proposed Amendment
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA, AMENDING
CHAPTER 95 OF THE CITY CODE ENTITLED 'PARKS AND RECREATION" BY
AMENDING SECTION 95.04 REGULATING PARK HOURS.
The City Council of Apple Valley ordains:
Section 1. Section 95 of the Apple Valley City Code is hereby amended by changing
Section 95.04 to read as follows: <"
§ 95.04 HOURS.
No person other than a City agent, employee or police officer acting jn his or her official capacity
shall be in any park during the hours the park is closed.`,,Parks shall be opened at the earlier of
7:00 a.m. or sunrise and closed at 10:00'p.m- except:
(b) events or activities authorized by the City at the Haves Arena, the Apple
Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication.
PASSED this day of 2015.
Mary Hamann -Roland, Mayor
ATTEST:
Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk
E6 L.
CCcC
CCCfG
gB06
CITY OF aPRIO ey
MEMO
Planning and Development Department
TO: Park and Recreation Advisory Committee
FROM: Thomas Lovelace, City Planner
DATE: April 29, 2015
SUBJECT: Proposed Amendments to the City's Park Dedication Benchmark Land Values
and Per Person Ratios
On May 14, 2015, the Apple Valley City Council will conduct a public hearing to consider
amendments the City's park dedication requirements. The proposed amendments pertain to the
land values and persons per unit ratios currently used by the City to determine park dedication
requirements for new development.
The City's subdivision regulations provide for dedication of land or easements for the purpose of
offsetting the need created by new development for new parks or storm water holding ponds. The
regulations also provide for a cash -in -lieu of land dedication where the size or location of such
dedicated lands within the development would be inappropriate to serve the need created.
Minnesota State Statute 462.358, Subdivision 2B., requires that cash contributions must be based
on the market value of the land at the time of subdivision approval (i.e., the unimproved or "raw"
land value), and that the funds be dedicated to the use for which they were acquired. Funds
collected in this manner are to be used for the acquisition and development of land for public park
purposes, and redevelopment of existing parkland.
Park dedication requirements are based upon the parkland demand created by the use contained
within each subdivision as it relates to the generation of person -residents. The amount of
parkland required for each person -resident is based on the need for parkland to achieve the park
services standard, which the City has set through its historic parkland development. The City
standard is 0.00955 acre of parkland area needed for each person -resident. Where cash -in -lieu of
land is taken, the value of the land shall be based on the benchmark values of raw land that are
set by the City Council based on periodic review of market conditions.
The City's last "benchmark" land value for computing cash in lieu of land dedication was set on
December 9, 2004. These values were established prior to recent recession and may not be
reflective of current market conditions. In addition, a developer involved in several recent
residential development projects in the city has also raised some concern that our existing
"benchmark" values are higher than current land prices.
Because of this, the City retained Patchin, Messner, Dodd and Brumm, real estate valuation
service companies familiar with land values in the south metro area, to do research and analysis of
single-family, multi -family, commercial, and industrial land sales in Dakota County and
surrounding area in order to arrive at an indication of an average market value for un-platted
property in Apple Valley. The purpose of the analysis was to determine "benchmark' land
values for cash -in -lieu of land dedication for public park purposes associated with new
hA20141park dedicatioW5.7.15 pm memo.docx I
developments in the city. Conclusions of the consultant's analysis indicated that the existing
"benchmark" land values may not reflect recent unimproved land sales in the area, in particular,
land sales for residential development.
Staff also felt it was appropriate at this time to review the persons per unit ratio used in the City's
parkland dedication calculation. The current ratios are the following:
• 3.2 persons for a single-family dwelling unit
• 2.1 persons for a townhouse dwelling unit
• 1.7 persons for an apartment dwelling unit
The Metropolitan Council provides annual population estimates, which establishes persons per
household ratios for their calculations. The 2013 population estimates, which are the most
current, had the following persons per household ratios:
• 2.7 persons for a single-family dwelling unit
• 2.7 persons for a townhouse dwelling unit
• 1.7 persons for a duplex, 3 and 4-plex dwelling unit
• 1.9 persons for an apartment dwelling unit
Based upon the information contained within the consultant's memorandum, staff will be
proposing reductions in the residential land values and an increase in the industrial land value.
Staff may also ask the City Council to consider adding a townhouse category to further delineate
residential park dedication requirements. Finally, staff will recommend that the persons per unit
ratio be amended to be consistent with the Met Council.
Recommendation: Staff is looking for input from the Park and Recreation Advisory
Committee on the proposed changes prior to the public hearing.
N\2014\park dedioation\53.15 prat memo.doex
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
MEMORANDUM
Mr. Thomas). Lovelace, City of Apple Valley
Jason L. Messner, MAI, and Randy J
April 10, 2015
Average fair market value of un-platted
At your request, this memorandum i
commercial, industrial and residentia
order to arrive at an indication of a)
Apple Valley. Fur
particular property
memorandum is qY
fees. <11
following data
i examined.
pre, this consuilt
iin th City offi
de gui once to the
to sumze our research and analysis of
in Dakota aunty and surrounding areas in
cet5ad ps for un-platted land in the City of
is not intended to be an appraisal of any
e Valley. Rather, the function of this
in determining appropriate park dedication
pertaining to the review of park dedication fees have
• R ewed'City of Apple Valley zoning and land use information
• RevieNwd Minnesota Statute 462.358 Subd. 2b. regarding park dedication fees
• Investigated comparable commercial, industrial and residential land sales
• Completed statistical analysis on observed market -transacted sale prices
City of Apple Valley
Land Analysis
April 10, 2015
Page 2
ZONING
Commercial development in the City of Apple Valley is generally allowed within six zoning
districts. These commercial districts are as follows:
NCC, Neighborhood Convenience Center District
LB & LB-1, Limited Business District
GB & GB-1, General Business District
RB, Retail Business District
SC, Regional Shopping Center District
VB, Visitor Business District
The land sales summarized on the following commercial sales grid are assumed to have
zoning and potential uses consistent with these commercial zoning districts.
Alternatively, industrial development in the City of Apple Valley is allowed within three
zoning districts. These industrial districts are as follows:
BP, Business Park District
1-1, Limited Industrial District
1-2, General Industrial District
The land sales summarized on the following industrial sales grid are assumed to have zoning
and potential uses consistent with these industrial zoning districts.
In comparison, residential development in the City of Apple Valley is categorized by 14
separate zoning districts. Six districts generally comprise the low -density residential
category, which includes single-family, residential cluster, and two-family developments.
Multi -family development is allowed within eight zoning districts, defined as Districts M-1
though M-8, ranging from 3-4 units per acre to 12-24 units per acre.
PATCHIN MESSNER Dow) & BRIIMM
City of Apple Valley
Land Analysis
April 10, 2015
Page 3
r � .
iiY1l
qpp
6 �g
a
s
e
S t y
e
g
Fti�
p
E�
eL
't�=[�f�i
CN
d!��a��J2ia�so
3v
! 1.1 Fu
'rI
€ s
duW asa PuLvrl 0£UZ 1 R11
PATCHIN MESSNER DODD & BRUMM
City of Apple Valley
Land Analysis
April 10, 2015
Page 4
17II7. n. re
Due to the differences in density potential and the corresponding values perceived by the
market, the single-family and multi -family comparable land sales are presented on separate
summary grids. The land sales are assumed to have zoning and potential densities
consistent with the residential zoning districts in Apple Valley.
Lands guided for commercial, industrial and residential development in the City of Apple
Valley are identified on the City of Apple Valley 2030 Land Use map on the preceding page.
As depicted on the City's land use map, the majority of the land available for development is
located in the south portion of the City.
PARK DEDICATION FEES
The City of Apple Valley is reviewing its park dedication fee requirements applicable to new
subdivisions to ensure consistency with the State's statute. This examination was initiated
after the City received feedback from certan owners/developers that a review of the fees was
needed. The purpose of this memorandum is to aid in determining the need for updating
the City's market value estimates of commercial, industrial and residential land. These land
use market values are vital for establishing cash fees in lieu of park land dedication.
State Statute
Minnesota Statutes 462.358, Subd. 2b. enables the City to require dedication of a portion of
a subdivision to the public for parks, recreational facilities, playgrounds, trails, wetlands or
open space. Minnesota Statutes 462.358, Subd. 2b. (c). further requires that there be an
essential nexus between the dedication of land or payment of fees based upon the City's
purpose for the dedication and that the dedication or fee must be roughly proportional to the
need created by the development and, where fees are to be dedicated in lieu of land, that
the fee be "based on the average fair market value of the un-platted land for which park fees
have not already been paid."
PATCHIN MESSNER DODD K BRUMM
City of Apple Valley
Land Analysis
April 10, 2015
Page 5
DEVELOPMENT LAND SALES
The purpose of this consultation was to investigate land sales in order to develop the
average fair market value of development land in the City of Apple Valley. The average
market value is necessary for the City of Apple Valley to complete their review of park
dedication fees and determine if modification of the current fee structure is needed. The
sales comparison approach is the preferred, and most common, technique for developing a
market value estimate for land. Typically, the sales comparison approach compares vacant
land sales to a subject property. However, in this case, there is no specific subject property.
As such, no adjustments are made to the comparable sales.
Rather, as a group, the comparable sales are expected to indicate a range of unit values
established by informed buyers and sellers in the marketplace. The average market value
can then be utilized as a reasonable estimation of average fair market value for land in
Apple Valley, thereby meeting the guidelines of Minnesota statute.
Sales of land in Dakota County and surrounding areas were researched using the Appraisal
Data Network database, Northstar Multiple Listing Service and the REDIComps database.
Information has been sought on recent sales of parcels that are similar in terms of potential
use consistent with the zoning categories within the City of Apple Valley. The search for
development land sales focused on unplatted land and outlots in outer -ring suburban areas
that closed after January 2011. Given the higher number of single-family development land
sales in recent years, tighter criteria for this land use category resulted in sales primarily
from Apple Valley, Lakeville and Savage, having closed after January 2012.
The unit of comparison used for each of the property types is price per acre. The sales used
in this analysis are presented on location maps, followed by summary grids, and statistical
analysis.
PATCHIN MESSNER DODD & BRUMM
Valuation Counselors
City of Apple Valley
Land Analysis
April 10, 2015
Page 6
�t1 ,„a
W Ha6la0 II e CO z] a 9
R fe � to tzt t 16 tal Ai N J., !T., u . � ,R - � I
_ ,P
zo] I, m 2 ��"I 'v' r Weston i .
I-" Fbld,w� 4 I Id p hry MaOh
e ChtRnplM: D,west l 52
_ Ius e
na � i103Ili aP'
�rk l I 1��j 4-
g�
Ib .^n, ,a, <z�Ip 1610VeI� - ll,`',��`i_., py�.�I. lAkc� �Gtant� It p 1 t "' S�y —`2 n
L"too
j' 54
oreno ss 1 ['bv'+-t �bbn 'Oolumivtes.���'f'—� tx13
H N P r-fJ i ty..{� a 1 "He�' l..
.t Medine,l {j4 oPi otM "rya t'°ti es I °; t.,,, z3 `-'s cs P Comp 1
tkotto L x
-Lake PPP���ttt )�� Ce e^ 6�y rilintj7..._I Esc Iw-- _ 1 p--
M IGote Lake' y n sz Mel I rf P tk
snm�aey OaklKnoft ^, 40" 3 :o it ozeo r s�_ ' s, --.Oi, ek a is
I s _� #Flepsi>1 R� ki 10 _.
psapa Hw spw�:' k
1�ae� Comps 3, 15,19 • -ti-- .
DeepMven, 1 W� vJ 111
a eo'�L se Comp 10 as Iy IV,l—, ,� oobbu
Eureka
iw
- .. tJek ` �! �. Merw H let➢ d ',. s_ — ,p r
s _ aC�vm eeatn f h _... d
Chslnitesecza.Ca is p
Comomps'i 11 ]s ` ----- Iv 212_i /f ,� ,] ITs ss
roN4AR+PER 14 min o. D' "°� ' xs D
aA 9F
I - Comp17
a o i Comp •l'd?010
s._ n — 7
IMF .'�^ t .t 7t
°bower- Comp 14 7° w 14. ,'� -., s,>du, _Ntnv,psr 43 ..L .
Comps 5I
, 6 RICK Nast
vi-_ ss
I ! mP I
eaaca ^s tyke eua �,p
1� :-. CO 1 .e
v
R
LI O lJke Dam ack
�
JOtden O 1 TI ss !C,etlnAiuer ss GIs -IQeV IB i'.D A K O comp g�wmiWon
Comp 12 0
I! 13 I l w 1 `6amdnglon
18 zs q- ka mpbn
tt-StPatrwk IZ,tNyw i'^m
ee11 N — e Comp 16
s ]
Elkol New rkel < Egsngd 6's
1_ C k M I N A E S j 0 T A, f
3
New
P�ip'ue 11 -
I r SLFUR 1 R I C 6— �� °Nazeww I Rwdolph° , - - _ ; GOODHUE
COMPARABLE COMMERCIAL SALES LOCATION MAP
PATCIDN MESSNER DODD & BRUMM
GW & Apple Valley
laad Analysis
April 10, 2015
Page
a.x..xra
ry w•a•nwn
+�.+�o..m�R..
mr. .sn
mre
». mm.w
m
aww
an.
nxrn«.t..r..W.. W...
,wmdm
m.•+p. wn
_. a..gwn
mx.x
uc
a��nr ren. w..w� xt`.."x..P+^m
pp.mYr�un.
eorwn
emn
Ymr.mw
�. m�gx;�arf ru.Jr�
.pu an^
cee
n.uq nrmw
o
aamim
am
^. mWx
nwruan
wNrrnv.uc
n. Wafbwe.
mo���acuna
r�x`sny:—a
xr. nnn
pm
nwa. v�aw
m
n.tmw
p,
� n.r�.r.rrnx�.0
w
�r�
nu .mn
a
..ru n.rex
m
va¢m
uro.
9.nw.w
WWp�OMry Y.Ynpw^n
n^mnwn
m.,.rrm
.ra
r
� � f`�tlrM LLt
my aat
tlW
.nb ]M®
v
ryi.w
.¢
wa.Yppwr.ya�ny WMlnm4
��s
.
�gMw..rMtirrimuirY
i tnA �Ybww
mtf fb^
c.
.ww m.¢O
n
¢m.OA
IY).
nxgrryw.w^m
wyYn.rexrra uc
�wmWwwpn
W�a�w
dul
pra
xww.n.11
1 m12
aWr, wxa
xra w.11c
f umf Zn.nnwrn Mvn
�
mn fna
c]
..NN YY.w
n
MN.w
arA.
r inrrrhf wwx
arwY.rw
I[m�p
CR Wt6tly. uC
�x�
t M..abwrru
f Af. txpm
..rwea
.^es nxmmi
m
bvnw
vet m
r+r.rvM�bM/'nr>.
pW1MLLn Mt
Mww..YG
W.nWn
6mYA1#11vw xIM
City of Apple Valley
Land Analysis
April 10, 2015
Page 8
10=819Ei�URNE�
�,
�dtiog 1 k
63
�i
eJ
5
WRIC,HT 42,`,-31
i
Ni
r is
D12
8-2t
zoJ R
I 1
z!A10-j1
FklcherT' ,
�...
117
116
j8urt�vllle--f-30.,
1
1
ioe
L R
iro `
"N"N
So
Sotffi1via3"
Coon Lake ('
Beath 1_
Sle
IRa-78
+
..a
_.—_eLBke r+e110
Lake
Andover
tie - _ 17
I. 1
A N
Q K A
r J Comp 12
j i e QHISAG�
i 1 a
—a
' us joreal Lake 1
. c
Imo-- � -ate
I i v x
I Mfi +S Cr
21 :. Weabn ..
lftemMe 'Maple lsliNKl e5
i t
'SA �i71
e+ i _ 1
. 16 1®_L_St
I iite Bear '.aWhhr ' CamdlKn
ah Jvetliw!
r i 4et Comp 9 i
66 5 r
t _ 3t
7 ( t'„sa'o" ru & zJ V W Fp PTO
-"r.�11,,eR�1� 153 t n36 f t P Ills - ti1
Ykerifs 1 la Lake es take { r1 z F _ ° S I P N Nal�h HdD�lgl
17 l
°stubha epy _ , i �t
n ao - } °. `ry�7—+I�., 3t va p a le Comp 4
t9 51 1(aeedkM ,' ,6 f oe i r Sl ;ti \ II 3 1. i T 1f-1
l�a9lf
l��l._ .-.r �SeAe17aC ree
�� J- J"}'
Comp 5 1 t J7 a t h ss
O ir1wbeeD atl a ' ., J '.'0 17 - z2 ale i a ale S 68
1Comp 6 ® .
_ p �Paut. _I_ '. -. Ile, Won
comp 3 on eJandata _ui I" �-
_ P
CNailhi i.q,. F �.3, 73 - p�m1
a)r3 z1z l t _ 1 35 1" 7 i6s J 1, Comp 11 adage 6 ss--j n
�� I m
]' a�; a
Comp 7 lap f Lt N . la � yJp Grp" ° Comp 1
comp
61 a ei9M!' \ y. u
CO 10 j - 1
41 the .. ..- k Ji't-. -, ' 3= ]e d
ii
n d _ �i tl-PSOarr'I}siheye�tl , le �t Comp l4 m
a all'_� piz JekRit-.� Y Rasemoua nlr liael -�.t. PIERCE
_ 73 -RO
aJ
ProrJ.$ke 46
Ba9e0
SpnnB idkmo '{� Deer Pack' i5e C13 91 64,1
°tWrdaetlen 1' t omp
_t_ E.,S O
_ S l7 O 7 r aB�.L. le �t 62 _._.
Joraea }�r� Crcfil 1 I ismJU Ile, . Comp 2 o rmison 31a
i I, J 141 n �' F D A K 09T^A 17�
R3 52
St 21 I.I hkke, A✓Pp
is
.t 5P8a—fk
.I' qEura;I Hampton
i i ,New Tner PAg�S.
vas'
z - I New rkel as
! °EIkO� ,itl6waM Casllf
iJaw Prague— _ ' ti _ _ _ RPck. _
LE` SUEI.9R 19 �— 3 R 1 C it - GOODHUE
COMPARABLE INDUSTRIAL SALES LOCATION MAP
PATCHIN MESSNER DODD & BRUMM
City of Apple Valley
Land Analysis
ApHI10,2015
Page 9
i0 -Idai Land Salea Smpp Grid
camp lemlon
Saw
Ow
9a14,
3pel As m
rew
Prlsa Per
Ne.
IMeMe61Ju
Salk,
ofaaY
Ac.w
zoiato,
Wallkill
PXw
acmeC tMc
U%pxu
Acn
Rwanlu
1
61W JamekaAw.d B]MSL S.
L..&"LaM. LLC
121 M.
24to
a
Awtlaek
$3119,331
$95,"1
3,0xt218
k Cglge Gmve MIM1
CMageIXMN
mmsa0eaMleaaekzAsmsmMam
to IABMSY 61.
(MenllegmlgAVxelnw)
2
Sol" sm. laAavbe&W
F6 Gmw LLC
101 M.
232Onc
C-2
AwAaCb
fIMON)
SO
5366O.w
5135.17R
Tgprog6ywes pAacO mTFe1MaM Tehvyer
LaapvR, MN
Alllaka dwbpnMl lrc.
pszlaO eRy<Mmapanr
(INus Wamamne)
3
CPEC Ea Jm J8231 LLC
a 1201,
t0.00K
I.1
M..a a
32,06Z.OW
50
Sx.O52.000
S2C M
TM PloWf-1"Wlym o.d.
S ofs,e. MN
JCN Fmprlba al ssn oe. LLL
(IrvIwIM-MamAcllwgl
NeaMeNam MDooss nImwmetlleb
1
P ao�o,MN
SlJ pkel¢eb, B16
S Ix11z1
1919 ec
Bp
AvaRede
$2 /W,WO
SO
iUC0.000
112a 1a0
iM plaPtlymalXeletl pepeMvns MaAazK using
UW
lake EAno, MN
U. InM,LLG
•WnUMfirdeed. Thecmlrep lemb ere J%
I6wed1
Mlelest maY. forBw Yeers.
5
2383p Kiob Rmtl
so,a wP9Mers 1. LLC
11201a
300.
1
AveWde
S78,460
1275.000
S353.660
$117.920
TM{M W pu" mMekO, TM"r was
Membla H.Wo, MN
SMamead Raley Audmmy
nngrokb to- Sm m.l arwnuml,a5m.xenw.
(IMIbIdaQ
ss]s.WO.
6
6lVp 14a 61a81
aP, LLC
12 /no
3136K
Si
lRAmmn
SI,M0,WO
SO
21.560,D)o
Se2sm
T-maIOMit of iXe is eeXeM me.
Wow". MN
WasKbplbJRimseY AcyWs111m, LLC
(Ob e)
]
War a.
01nCe s,,i Cm LLC
7/2013
4380 aC
12
Vnbwwrr
11.950,e00
60
51,950.OW
iM,521
lM see runs pAhry mehelK.
Si oosl,. MN
RemiKa.a
(ommrwemmm�el
0
Oean LM—aOobr,d
RUaF diss,' ft.
812013
5.14.
w
...bse
HW.325
$0
N98.325
$%.a0
TM less "Ifi",...W.
61NAOsee. MN
Rm Cmmperias US, Im
(dfiYM1VMlleaf0)
P
6T3530M S.1 Nola,
pue Ted pmpdbz tLC
81 MIZ
2301 Ac
vo
Avaiabe
sm000
smm
31, 150,000
H9,913
rib prym npnl apOmNmekb'f250.WOrtmmAya
OM.M. MN
GaMek HPA
pwF eoA�cmedaab. FYrc
(MemM1CKNrgN/a�eKmee)
Was, en mn.nM�M
10
60"l!50e1 S~Wsr
MenFO.lrc.
712012
W.SBec
1-2
AvaAede
Sa,389.354
so
KU9351
SM215
ThiskamxAmMeNe. 58e papKMlps seplMed
Apple v~MN
Nmzm MM wM Prt st LLC
ewrMdAb4gzm Me sXeb MM1W. ]be anb
IIMOMMI. WmftdLw,)
DdCembdlercdaes M MGtlndemglbnonl.
r.MG b eapeded b bexlptl5nrd mibk pae
11
His"3
I Wy G,IeMm,LC t
312012
5.94 ac
PO
P,oslnnle
SM1,380
la5361.330
WOOD
TMsk amarkNM eab TM1exhrpmviAMazliorl-
Eyan,MN
1Mmtl FAnC,01G
IM', osb MdeN.
(Car CAA)
12
1201a LMe aoldevwtl Wrift
Wellzift,LLC
91 nil
321ec
Al
Agispp
HW.WV
SO
U00,000
112A,611
IN MbwropUb"Marselo, SplmmamiraMn
WMb BaK Wee. MN
EM 01 M T. or Beep
mUl Wwa{mm[W or Me seller PMr'O Me
IOBIttR1'aleAallu)
ub rM w/erw»9Nen1a86.0apmpooba nF
hNf aM a RetlmMopnmi TiF Note M f311,W0.
13
CleYlan A—m,"0
H Ms9 ft
21 Mil
28.0 ac
GI
ANXrEb
0191d76
(SSW OOp)
33194.378
f114.035
An a18®
IAIIi aM sl OaNeluo{nmebM forrill{
RMemO 'MN
a.siorl Rs,.. LLC
an azemal.e value olsea0.000 TM
rclbmlvl IWhb51e0
lR
Me nn raR eMzaa.
la
11 am ColMme 9a m
C. ApmMenb MC
a 2M1
/drat
sm
ROdmab
f3W050
f0
f3410M
123.710
T 15 nr lW m Amos l00ewbp A f fine of
^w, G'aw NMPds'MN
Ral°'i^c'
pnflbsa. ilk WWOMkWTIn I1re 1010 A1Yse
(lndicldaa
Bdoll.,
113]ac
Medkn
$10.5518
MWK
Mem
NWaN
CrMna: Uaaa6ed 1pd xJ csllbb lminsa dMMN mIM. ovMMa etlM.bGaeda.SmX aM FapMk9 yba 8, t, 8f11119aba1: Mann 3119.16P
WUM,gbn CAVMeb lta Saba) Remp H9.913 �fRW2dd
City of Apple Valley
Land Analysis
April 10, 2015
Page 10
169 Bethel
'Backer< [,Stacy _ tmm
Center City
St Francis Coopers
Carted ids Bence Lkulse .
to „wade Linwood , Linwood Chili o C
IJl°rt '. /. Glen, a8 dY
Big Lake Nowthene Oak Grove A N O K A �Wyoming Osrso9a,
26 Bailey ,
°Eac Rwer East Bethel Montcello ` SodervsC H I S A G_O_
le. 4 �+,t.' ..
A' R 4 G H 1 Otsego Lake Netle 1
' Ramsey ,Forest Lake POLK
Albertville to Y ,Ham Lake t,l �ncla East'
,c, o ndia"r r Farmington
,Str1AIPg Mill l West
an
lr St M.ohd •=Rook, o
Rogers.' D14 _ ,Ormk Marine On
Buffalo 8 Dayton m Tkompson Heights _- ei LOMe St Croix ST CROIX
FlettlMr` r'. Champlin Well Coon Rapid, ,01rde `OP�rer. no
c y`wRt ; PIm"
66 HanoveH E N N Ft P I N ts9 �a ? , n�el�le �Uno Lak J Comp g fit,
9ursclrvih' Maple Grove, `Osseo `Spllrg Lake Park I While Arcola 35
Rockford Comp, 6 Iyn Park lid Shomlfew°r L°
take Sarah P _. Pled o i -
V Medina ° et @righton °y' adnaic gam_ ahtomed, rn
1aDh J o �leghls eSelrwarer
Comp 10 P Oak Park Heights, O
Delano He,
W e IT - dine Springs
Independence .A a Plymouttlansd dan lAsttlranyei 1 se McPI�� WASHI .ON °BrYWrt O
Maple Plain -a' f LaudetU EY Z
'-- - &_. too_ : ja ;! Falcon Heights Oskdeled_ Non h Hutladn„
m
Minnatnsta, Orono,-ek91e IA a elk ¢ HutllddlWatertown t9 Woodlaal° - P � i St PaUI6' Mldvae`: andfall
Mound �Ainn Dolls =t Lakalantl ~
zs ` Oeeptleven` tot ki LaNa Ha pa$lSl Peul
t 1 I
•w ln-e-
St BenddLtUa, Excelsior, ° i WeWood
1 55 + e m Comp 3 e
GreenwooA., Jy1INNE OTA •I Lllydldb Point
--.=Sfrorawaod Eden 1, _. us; :_-�- SJnhsh Lahe, e5oR111$il ul
Maph 5 Carve BeaGr` Prallle-0,.� 13 1 9serwio ,'Newport _.
`Vitoria _ Comp ;Hlight� 3
6Wacann, Jonathan at Inver12 ° ,a sitwood Grove
'Hydes C A R V E R - Com 5 t {' Comp 9
Lake „ P „&oanin®IoFem p' gan Pine Send
Dahlgren _ I o ... 4Pofl a,B'a ��`..°' Rose
aa�— o a•- it0 Point PIERCE
Cobgne Carver 1r '° 3 Ninklger` Dbugnna�
Gramwood, arJ d ' �Ir-$-I Rosemount ss 4Prescott
East Union
mimist wn, Prior Lake GaNen, 1' 420 Va Coate, �Hesd g as
p Sdath
aweeGatka ANM>WJars n Spring Laker Da, Park' FI:Argonne lartdlrep,.
_ - 262 Credit River, zt 1 D COillp I
LOW"Olte 'Jomen ; yd,e iI, ,Andes wParkk Empire,' Verrttdiron Few.
SISLEY 21. - ? °L w Farmington
Hr3elena 1 --
'Blakaby rtlelM P Eureka Comp 2 Slroms
Barred" Comp 4 ke I Center Pdew Thar Vesvi8e Hadiss-
ss Comp I I c G 0 1 r New Market` ,E po <
Eidswold castle Rock 52 '
weld,
New Prague 7 --- .. Webster, I, Hazelwood Rarki*h
Vasty.,, `� - , Cannon Falls
Sr Thomas ` Vasa
- Heidelberg LonsdaM I m Waterford Richard J Doter Meorial
WhealleM a ftti Chicago `.. t9 _ Hardwood Bute Forest
,Lexington!. I' ,Stanton G O O D H U E
Northfield Salle Creek
L E S U E U H °Montgomery MnMoourg,R {�,' C E ,Dundas
aDennmon ,Sogn ,Wastedo
,Le Center
,ca mus
°St henry yCkUyk f White Willew,
'Shieldsville Nansen Hader 52
COMPARABLE MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SALES LOCATION MAP
PATCHIN MESSNER Dow & BRUMM
City of Apple Valley
Land Analysis
April 10, 2015
Page II
Mulfi-FamilyLand
Sales Summary Grid
Lane LoullPn
Bever
Oa1e
PoleMbl
gale
so Aamel
TWI
pd. Par
No.
IManWd Usa
adM
Ad SAW
AnA,A
zerIN
Eloraft UnIWAc.
Innide,
Paw
Oelno Led. Nc.
salefed.
Ace
Remarks
1
NWC 147MSI. W. A F1a9dae Aw.
Cmtlemltal P.".
PereN."
1000 ac
PUI40l
12
Munhpal WaMr
31,742,000
SO
$1.142,0UO
3114,200
TM Wronneagm Ardm for Mls pmpeny eaA slI In
AMM VM".. MN
Penn RW1a, Iw
Ngun12014 eve M W1Mngern on Zen"apPmval for e
(T4)
loantrcaredevNepned.
2
NW0 Had" Avenue a. 2'Mh SL W.
Lanevlle cleMOW CMrtN
91 M14
an ac
RM-1
9
Munlclpd Wamr
5300,000
So
"Rom
343,231
TN' h A ..A~Zak Md was pnnased Mr[hurt�
teaesllle. MN
Joseph Wpm
use: haaesel. ae alle Is Zoned Mealum Deneay
IcnneA)
Redder"11 Dsnh15.000 SF)r A,
3
7595 Be" RAW!
St ThAnZW of Woodbury, LLC
91 MIA
Is 42 In,
P� A-1
10
Prosieate
$2,216,700
31.675271
33.891,971
M7,028
sela Thesib It 9uMw Ulan
,MAndTI9s,emarheled
weech. N
Wayne D. smimm .
v� a1m esedendy IeakamuL Repodedd tlm
wddvft i iMd)
M f.3 knnpaM
..A.mtpdhAi
assessment. TM sik wa vern,2T1
property ID. ".AnM inm*tldiEendl
Ion dewbpmanl rote
10, .A. AeAt
apa.neis, eenbr ell FseMpd INMg, It well ae
Cdnd,I RA eee. Deneky rnr MB M1:re 141-send
W
proleclh9.0 uniWecm.
4
207"InOb1
Need Caunb COA
612014
5.01 ad
C3
]
AvdlaeM
5700.000
W
ST00,O00
$139.721
Thhhemahakd Pri'MZa Meaner., pat fare,
Leedy0d. MN
Mbm 9en Sces. LLC
WPIAHAIrpumJu a9mnlwa
(T.InWiAe)
VrMInJanuary MICA.
5
14004 Allen apulmale
Con J.rA1 98 FuW. UC
5 1 2014
33,2A ec
Ph1D
B
AA II
U.142.033
SO
u 142,033
5124 610
This is A pubycly mefW Property Mrere Me Zenner
Sevye. MN
$Mron'Her, eIdI
-
had en appmiselvahredd54,300.Ow
(MunLFamlly Apartment)
B
Callon PWInI ry
TCIP Island VW", LLC
11 12013
1580n,
MO
11
Available
5;000.000
30
$2,000.000
$128,205
Thb end eAry Intludes open Aber all an�land. Plans
MauMtere a. MN
k
Callon Real ESMConned, LUP
are to Wed 175 umis
(MUNFamIV Aperinam)
T
4232 BMQheak Road
Eagan Polnte Senior Lrvn9, LLC
9 / 2013
10.4a ec
eD
14
A.11wee
31900.Wo
$0
31.Mmo
$181,992
TM a ea idmlMed here h EaWd on Daneb C rd,
Eagan, MN
DmAd L. a Mnv I. Holden
GIS dab for Me new pa.IgM1akJ6on rvrtneent
IMdd{amlNSaviort")
WashbMlonL '%, Houak9 and
B
TO Mahbmedl AdevM
RedevNopneM AOMeft
812D13
3.31 ec
B]
24
Ayanebh
f1.030,000
go,
S1.O30,OOO
$311.178
rhhh a Aranetedproperdwlue ty1hathad anaMIZI
MahIWWI MN
IMnNred SII
PI3052.000. Plans wereromMPucte 1eldry.
(MUILLFerdly Senor LMn9)
22T.OW SF xmm Musing MPFry Thaln drwas
rwa the and ens, neduae Z61 cammpna far deer,
Mried on tl1e AN
9
9179CahMAwnua
(NekoM CWnf, COA
3/ 2013
5.m ec
PUD
12
AnHANA
$250.000
SO
5250.000
543.%3
hne eve h for dew1r,tdwMM2e hdusiw rear
1. Gorse Hd9hh
HxMebne. Inc re as delver br
Warean.
we'd F.Rv ApeTronl)
TM Roltlund Company. Ire
10
875 WAlala Baubvam WAst
CPE EdhaMe Made, LLC
612011
t0A3 ad
R♦'1A3
6
Pmtlmale
5830,000
w
6a30o00
$79.518
ThlshamelxMdaak. Apnexlmelelyhatlef Ments
Dow. MN
U5 WM. LLC
hwethw sme. The Luee LIIa hell Mmem Me
(Mul4-Famny Senlpf LM,p
proper" " "Arb.
11
022 AZeNeen Avenue
DN Treece SeMorHWSMI of Joman, LLC
11 2011
5.00K
PUD
11
Ped,werle
5435000
30
3435.000
587.000
TM Add."Polchuel n% 500 Mrm: howawr,
Jeo.. MN
He, L Peeper, eMl.
1.13 acres were eMdip d9n1d-
IMUBFFamny Senor U.Mg)
vey. relmebh
enn.
wey, msWlMg M a dnNepeMe sore of 3.81 eGma.
1000 ac
MWIAA
3120.205
111]ac
Mesn Awn
111-0
Cmere: Uwlatled land Add under, unread, W eTdee weed, over Are Zone, In Carve, O*ota. eacludiN Sales 2 11 is ales): akaA 18;112
Hwrse*. Smolt and WashirZAAA CWme, 01 SAka) Range STP,Pa."I1.1ye
City of Apple Valley
Land Analysis
April 10, 2015
Page 12
is -
Ss MI
i 42 '. 52 yyNNaa11 .'-- 28 •�
I WIIdRk 14a10'go
tocols yes l4
BI in a Wescotf� a
I
1 24 Eagan -16
16
I N Cedar '`' 41
MGRv1y NaPl - tr Grove F So-
---------- --
1
"i�loomlr�lon Ferry
WildRtelRae Area
Rise l.a/12 -- .�.., ' 13 wI V / C
�Poh Cargill_ CO 12 L benon Nllls Rsgkwol ftrk
r �
i
Sov a_ � 3` ° l JBumavilie Win
Comps 2& 4
3, u
Comp 20, 21 -
;� - I Comp 16, 18 aApplevalb 33 Comps 1, 5 & 26
.1 Rosetnouni
/t O% .f l 42
2 d�. i __. I F -,
.4J M4
asr ._ Comp 19 Com 15
P
Murphy-N an s. 5\1 A K T,
.DNf Parx':+).;,� Comp 9 e
�. Comp 13 i I
_ oCredit Riwr -. a
- as.-.. COComp 1Comps 3 ]7 ,1 M I N' N E O, T
i S C D T T i Attlers Park
Lakavi
IT�
,]0 „
- s ! Comp 6 s Comp 1 ] 24ke Comps 7, 8, 10, 22, 23, 24 & 25
,
iisi 29
i
� E
I
I
: 416 j L
' I Eureka I
Center
i
COMPARABLE SINGLE-FAWLY RESIDENTIAL SALES LOCATION MAP
PATCIIIN MESSNER DODO & BRUMM
Valuation Counselors
Ciry of Apple Valley
Land Analysis
Apn110, 2015
Page 13
1 sEe Pb RMRn.eiSlm y.w
F
V.M90Vb� z]nc
qm
RFymeb
sx311,ass
w
[z.zli.us
sR./m
NpFVRYy.lxl
R*
Pln R.Yry
2 MYO YlmILMe Rlee R0.6
.Vm.IwwIILILL
In" IOwc
RJ
/rtlNy
IAI.SW
b
{10159
!!J,/10
IKP SE.4 Wnx
PpM RFYw. ule
RPVM. w
s Yrelcml
IaNMF.W
fJ Wex. q[I
Izol♦ OVs
all
/.LLYw
Nos.aa0
x0
Nn tlA
w!.¢L
suwaxvexevq.. uc
♦ KV JtlnryCM.Ny Fd.F Neg Wp,lLt /AI♦ ]}.tl� Pi /.MYx fl♦]B.� io {I♦RO51 0.yWB
I B]x 6ap WFM YYm PUA/, lic
.I{{wVM Ixx
! Eg1sBq VM O,R, Ma, Re.LLnMpF ]1101♦ tt,wu. R.] AM♦pb ll.xx].'kq m !IE].TO 1,[M
4M1VM.W F.ImRMx.M
!
]amRMWry
Egweepllal♦
Iew.c
RA
..Ow. 1/M.LYI
m
1145.fN
N1 TA
egpFgNNe�,1 LyeInMPgv Yaw,m EM�M
l
IBmaM/ep Rwnw
BRNawR M.xM.a4
IMI♦
ll,W w.
Rd
Aminrt RSM.PP
m
[}SA.wD
IDEwx
TwxrnMYpp W.Miwogli%q..
Irlxp.{N
ggax F.swrzr.,.ul.
11apRaNM1JY.gM.
x
Mglprnwr M.81Rq[RI.w
yenypwVmrnrclr
flan♦
si lac
M
NmYNn YSN 911
[IStt
w1N!']
N4,3W
lxswwtpiy m..wtl. rcrt.YxleVn.WYn.N
Itlr.NM1. [w
1. wweaex.zrlway.e.it
wegw.e.gap,le.rtrx♦w,Re.w,.
nrt«zlw.w.lrl.ertw..w oRPp..aalM1u.w.
o
mC.lvew
Ilie.Re,BM
x LWwiaNx=mrNNb
� IaN
Na 11
PM:
opF.v. !]!w>A1
wOdq
lzl.N7,]m
NIMa
1W wa�m.aMMMVEwcpwlFry a4.mx
wc♦a.Few.. Bu.gexwxu Rxreae.el.
Pwwq . mpaarc
Ia
nnao.6ninma
u4 Nin. fAFAYn
.Ian♦
MUF
.1
vrtsYMx
W.I.
m
Nzsi.m0
wlSa
1Mprp Mxae Wpraprl[Tlhsa�vJn
I.Wi, [N
anxxq Ba..wF..+ll. ma
WmRempW. ]I.F«.n., n..w
r.�a nyaexn.
11
I.m .ww Tm
ctS Wwaxmw. uc
]r al.
Hss]c
Rsr.z
nr..nme
lw.lxo
m
xlNA1E
s9,aw
]Nf auln.enwPM1r+. g111aesww.np\wrllry
lYe9e. Nx
RvftJE. Cie. q.wywTM
geµMIB.IN.
1
Izutlzltl.IxMaBW. M.
Yu.FW lhwv,R
xl.1
1..
wl
11Web.
sBw.gp
m.60
s1.aNOb
{Iw1)I
TH. M14M¢r1CYl Maas. pert lmVlM1na
FM. VYwI'.MN
&wNr:RxB: LaN
ARwwa.aAn.bF1a.11 W9F1n'.Ian�lewerl.
Ae W >esJRFMViryNMa AI..
Il
16aw Jdyn Pnp
FmeB.eLw.n. LLt
AI]
IMrc
0.1-1
M♦ab.
tYR,®
Ila,llq
]AI Wa
gl,♦!1
M6.neBa4Ya. lRpgw M.wgrtN trY
Ia1n11F.W
AR. FlPI
pn smle.ea e»ywzwW N..w W ewwew
Ervwa]+•awaavNB,voO.
1
ItwlRglOedRW
eJwrt uc
lal]
TAc
R[l1.RN
Fmem.1.
M..
}a
#Rp py
N!]
ApM1aM.W OM1. 1MpmpgMr.pYe
LagOM.[e
urtewe.u, xn
4{BRRII.me..elFw. IIx Ra.ew.IM1 ela
Is
1]N{rrq Rle Rea
wwR
�A
Ian
n.w:
wµl
rmana.
sxwe.za
m
szwgN]
tm.xn
Tn.sa•Iy..wgexP xv gRM1+•.+I w...
InMLMN
1M
wYp.II�I. LLC
ap n.MM1u 1A.. 111xartMIYMrIwTYF
City of Apple Valley
Land Analysis
April 10, 2015
Page 14
Sin le-Faml ResldeMlal Land Sale. Sum ma
Grid
Camp
L albn
arryvr
OPW
Ssb
.gel Anna,
Tqx
PH.. Pa.
Ne.
aware Uaa
Ygar
el BNa
Ac
ZaM
Wlltl»
Prba
OPP aK S.MPOM
AC
Ratio"
16
STb 15aT$Ne1 Weer
T. WWIry. LLC
91 W13
tw..
R-1
PmdmeM
=r pSp
30
3622.350
"U.525
TMSKTe wnWreXen Of Mea amM pneeK
SMI MN
CbK Vogl, elal.
pnc}veE San Tme aR9mnl faMrsld Te
eapeMlan Male Trap WeMdeMepmeM. A
PI-P"e»3 POM Mdn9lreln lo®IM an 32
go3arM.
n
13951)Nnmoa3TMl
DRNd1on.IrK. ulmeegJ
]Iz013
]O.CHy
R 2
AeW.Wo
31.2%.000
w
31.250,000
510,T0
TMi gepMywe pgMHmeitBleE»SDMgb4amfly
Ly»AW. MR
Sr. RMge W.., LLC
bI9MN peAm'Mry gM.ppmvM FMmatar. Te flnM
yp, }Ipgl y Slmie RH9e Rol b3tlbn. Ma.S
6M541MmB/bb hq W IRON.E an Te eq M
WtN9.
1B
SBN ISMSMeI We.l
rWm CinRI.LL
11201]
13a,
R-1
A-ft.
5300,22"
us.=
$W.227
333,R2
TM qb MO!»an wOehMYq.gNN.a3evneM
SMe .'MN
Heny D3RMMnn 5MhA1
krinM rTMkM. TMplrawW MHQerBM ormBr3M
precMay lF. popp br »wnNtoee K Cewk9
TreU WMn3N ApfNal. Tlr aeMrnrngk3e
rybaKe on Te wa9eM m.r.aM mrrve]Ml Poor m
eeWr, Tv.. BW pnMlye b br t] 3i Pay oIMM
Prey
RHoma9Mn.. W MNM
19
+T91M1S0BM
AWommMaw.
612013
.272 ae
RS3
AHWMd
51.145,e10
s0
31,1a3OW
338A03
TNeMemeheM sn.. llieb32ave 3iMeN]n»
LeReN!e, MN
Weg01V, LLC
(—K)
gMhG Ia B9 ebgle4m18y bb, brown a.
pOPH.
MP
Avhyn Ma M9ef. RaugPM 9.9 eve. dtlle mVe are
umeage.
20
9ouM 9115api 30Ml Weal
PL%,FlMeHOMM2eW.LLC
.12013
',♦O.bac
p3
Aozld
$2,9]IM
30
52.9]1,]10
391.99
ire prop311We YRhnW A9aeeUb Te openmahM
SM.Mge, MN
OamM d.S `,era.
.M 9aoNM MelMroy adN¢m P,MNMeNn.n
»mM9 to9esler. Para mode PRP%eneagrl weal
SMMPPH, xeh C»eOon rM .
ftr y,P
gghll3 MIWM vrvnM nryb�Mmey Mm»ere
wt
nWMIEMg•.
21
67011 TSarver MkM
TN, LLC
312013
236y
R-1
APAM3b
512ow
350.003
5186,IX0
$32.301
THaMabNnmedlabd wdelMtwx»po39 Mrhe
sMP,, MN
Feoxal won. MPdoran/wet.u.
mere brlM<ays. TMbMI Mab lNrteSWrWv
fB0.m0IPr11mLUaly yseitmmla. AIOn Mh W
»b.NB gogrO ras Mngoeetl MM eaTdolemMY
home Tooamyllen.
22
NEo 11P3E BNJ.8+90Tbt. w.
shammoW NPopp ear, Tc.
11XH3
3837ec
ft l-2
vroMKR
21,378,250
so
31.878250
p2,65]
T stMMPI.PHAPAWMmrbJe M"MP%Pa.
Laaae"a, MN
DF 3CwnWm, 61[
TMdOargm»lMUmebp brdemM.InOW bmaY
homy» ahieEwrJeasl»ngnW h lM are..m
emoted.
23
9m190Tsbeelwen
SeMPHax TRkpneM
121 M12
ltltac
RIA1
Prealmale
3522.000
ro
552z.W0
sa6.732
TM MryerIMBIBcb Mh aevaMro U.S. Hay
LaAaHM, MN
PPMPM`
CapanM KMMiOt..
24
I9 IMH,n MAM1
Stv. 4 ercbpmnr
Iz 12012
2000P,
Rs-3
Protlma9
3030.000
50
5900.000
3.5.W3
TtN prWMywaa bragMlNyGMCO,BPy MII
LM}eNR, MN
Phmbr De
Adobe.
25
Ny C IMyWe Ave. A 19.T S. W
U.S Home Caaa.lMn
it IM12
4000.P
RSJ
PmtlmMe
311800,00)
30
StH49.m
545.=
pared., Srmmnerlrn 1.1 AdRNP.
"I(MA A MN
"P...
29
Noll W 15M Sheol MPH
ORHa1nn, Tc. - MN
112012
28.81.1
R-3
Rotlmae
$1g32,5T1
sp
31A32,So0
3.9,Y12
1M pryeRywyM mlM veer�ma}eL lv.ever,
A(qb Velby, MM
PALM Relay, Ire.
Te se0er h" PIMP K rminl Peer, Ian m M1
Myas are IBII Bm aW Sea, Pe. Pt..t.
e,rMeroan mrdlilM aryeabMa Nrw9MN
tlW I,PPH
"go[esa. iMa Me it yjamX ro Cm,pehPb 5.
35.69 ea
MHMn
355023
46.B]N
Myn
3y.025
City of Apple Valley
Land Analysis
April 10, 2015
Page 15
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
It is important to note that the comparables have not been adjusted to a specific subject
property and not all of the comparables presented herein have been verified.
Based on our investigation, unit sale prices for commercial, industrial and residential land
proximate to Apple Valley are summarized as follows:
Commercial Land
Range
Mean
Median
Mean Excluding Outliers
Industrial Land
ang--
Mean
Median
Mean Excluding Outliers
Multi -Family Residential Land
Range
Mean
Median
Mean Excluding Outliers
One & Two-Familv Residential Land
$71,648 to $436,508 per Acre
$212,881 per Acre
$192,761 per Acre
$247,813 per Acre
$42,384 to $206,200 per Acre
$103,454 per Acre
$105,518 per Acre
$119,768 per Acre
$43,231 to $311,178 per Acre
$140,964 per Acre
$128,205 per Acre
$162,612 per Acre
Range $25,740 to $140,274 per Acre
Mean $61,025 per Acre
Median $55,022 per Acre
Mean 2014-2015 Excluding
Outliers $69,021 per Acre
Apple Valley Sales $75,781 per Acre
P.ATCHIN MESSNER Dom & BRumm
iti
iiii
ii•
CityApple®f
Valley
Approved by the Apple Valley City Council at its December 11, 2014, meeting.
Fees are effective January 1, 2015.
Description Current Required by
Fees I Section
Park Dedication:
Proportional Park Dedication Calculations:
153.29
Park dedication requirements shall be based upon the parkland demand created by the use contained within
each subdivision as it relates to the generation of person -residents. The amount of parkland required for each
person -resident is based on the need for parkland to achieve the park services standard which the City has set
through its historic parkland development. The City standard is 0.00955 acre of parkland area needed for
each person -resident.
Where cash -in -lieu of land is taken, the value of the land shall be based on the benchmark values of raw land
that are set by the City Council based on periodic review of market conditions. Present benchmark values
are:
Single family $150,000.00 per acre
Multi -family $175,000.00 per acre
Commercial $260,000.00 per acre
Industrial $100,000.00 per acre
or
or•
or
Residential Subdivision Formula:
Family = 3.2 persons/unit
ouse = 2.1 persons/unit
lent = 1.7 persons/unit
of units) x (persons per unit) x (0.00955 acre) = total land area of dedication
family at 3 units/acre: 3 x 3.2 x 0.00955 = 0.0917 acre x $150,000 = $13,755.00 per acre
single family unit = 3.2 persons x 0.00955 acre = 0.03056 x $150,000 = $4,584.00 per unit
at 6 units/acre: 6 x 2.1 x 0.00955 = 0.1203 x $175,000 = $21,052.50 per acre
townhouse unit = 2.1 persons x 0.00955 = 0.020055 x $175,000 = $3,509.63 per unit
at 18 units/acre 18 x 1.7 x 0.00955 = 0.2922 x $175,000 = $51,135.00 per acre
apartment unit = 1.7 persons x 0.00955 = 0.016235 x $175,000 = $2,841.13 per unit
Page 16
Description Current Required by
Fees Section
Commercial Subdivision Formula:
Service = 2 employees per 1,000 square feet of building area
= 3 employees per 1,000 square feet of building area
Tonal = I employee per 1,000 square feet of building area
ial = i employee per 1,000 square feet of building area
1 employee = 0.25 person -resident
fractional person -resident is based upon the more limited park services demanded by an employee
)loyee ball teams; picnic grounds; civic celebrations; etc.) plus certain park services related to the
)mer/client that patronizes the business on a per employee basis. The park dedication clause in the
livision agreement should make it clear that the actual amount of park dedication to be charged will be
d on the size of the building(s) to be erected. If land is taken rather than cash, the calculation would
ume a single story building on each lot with the maximum % building coverage of the applicable zoning
ict in which the subdivision is located.
.1/service building square footage/1000) x number of employees per 1,000 sq. ft. = number of
oyees x 0.25 = number of person -equivalents x 0.00955 acres = acreage to be dedicated x $260,000 =
dedication.
1000/ 1000 x 2 = 2 x 0.25 = 0.5 x 0.0095 = 0.0048 x $260,000 = $1,248.00 per 1,000 sq. ft. of building area.
,ffice building square footage/1000) x number of employees per 1,000 sq. ft. = number of employees x 0.25
number of person -equivalents x 0.00955 acres = acreage to be dedicated x $260,000 = cash dedication.
1000/ 1000 x 3 = 3 x 0.25 = 0.75 x 0.0095 = 0.0071 x $260,000 = $1,846.00 per 1,000 sq. ft. of building area.
nstitutional building square footage/1000) x number of employees per 1,000 sq. ft. = number of employees
0,25 = number of person -equivalents x 0.00955 acres = acreage to be dedicated x $260,000 = cash
1000/1000 x 1 = I x 0.25 = 0.25 x 0.0095 = 0.0024 x $260,000 = $624.00 per 1,000 sq. ft. of building area.
Page 17
Description Current Required by
Fees I Section
I employee = 0.1 person -resident
fractional person -resident is based upon the even more limited park services demanded by an industrial
loyee (employee ball teams; picnic grounds; civic celebrations; etc.) The park dedication clause in the
livision agreement should make it clear that the actual amount of park dedication to be charged will be
d on the size of the building(s) to be erected. If land is taken rather than cash, the calculation would
ame a single story building on each lot with the maximum % building coverage of the applicable zoning
ict in which the subdivision is located.
rdustrial building square footage/1000) x number of employees per 1,000 sq. ft. = number of employees x
1 = number of person -equivalents x 0.00955 acres = acreage to be dedicated x $100,000 = cash dedication.
1000/1000 x 1 = 1 x 0.1 = 0.1 x 0.0095 = 0.001 x $100,000 = $100.00 per 1,000 sq. ft. of building area.
Preliminary Plat
$609.00
Storm Water Ponding Dedication: 153.29
Minimum 5% of platted area less major rights of way (50 foot half right of way or greater)
Waiver of Platting
$213.00 153.76
Page 18
2013 Annual Population Estimates
Apple galley dty, Dakota County, Minnesota
Households: 19,363 Population in Households: 49,985 Average Household Size: 2.582
Housing Total: 19,853 Population in Group Quarters: 341
Occupancy Rate: 97.53% Total Population: 50,326
Metropolitan Council's Annual Estimates account for housing stock changes since April 1, 2010. These include housing units permitted and other
changes, other changes are due to demolitions, building conversions (units added or lost), city boundary changes (units annexed in or out], and other
changes reported by city and township staff. The Council assumes that 85%of multifamily and 95%of single-family units permitted in 2012 were
completed and occupiable by April 1, 2013; the remainder are occupiable in the future.
Manufactured homes are counted each year from Metropolitan Council surveys of manufactured home park operators and local governments. other
housing (boats, RVs, etc. used as housing) is an estimate from the most recent Census ACS estimates.
HousineStock
Permitted and
Otherchawres
Housing Stock
April 1. 2010
built since 2010
since 2010
April 1, 2013
Single -family -detached:
10,398
117
-8
10,507
Townhomes:
5,220
45
0
5,26S
Duplex, 3-, 4-plex units:
212
9
0
221
Multifamily units:
3,262
134
0
3,396
Manufactured homes:
508
464
Other (boats, RVs, etc. as shelter):
0
0
Housing Total:
19,600
19,853
Each housing type will have a specdically esdmatedmcupancy rate and average household size. Starting with the 2011-12 cycle, the primary data are
the most recent American Community Survey estimates, calculated and adjusted as described In the Council's methodology, available online at
http://Mts.metc-state.mn.us/stats/aboLitestimateszspx
Definitions: A household is a group of people (or one person alone) occupying a housing unit.
The number of occupied housing units and the number of households are equivalent.
Population in Group Quarters (or institutional housing) Is counted separately through an annual MetroporKan Council survey.
Housing Stock
Occupancy
Occupied with
Persons Per
Population in
April 1, 2013
Rate 2013
Households
Household
2013
Single -family -detached:
10,507
97.61%
10,256
2,714
27,837
Townhomes:
5,265
97.61'%
5,139
2.714
13,948
Duplex, 3-, 4-plex units:
221
99.50%
220
1.708
376
Multifamily units:
3,396
97.23%
3,302
1.878
6,202
Manufactured homes:
464
96.16%
446
3-637
1,622
Other:
0
Counted only if
0
1.800
0
oo:u0ied
'
Housing Total:
19,853
Households:
19,363
In Households:
49,985
In Group Qtrs:
341
Total Population:
50,326
Metropolitan Council 5/8/2014
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE PARK DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS
IN THE CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Apple Valley, Dakota
County, Minnesota, will meet at the Municipal Center, 7100 147th Street West, on Thursday,
May 14, 2015, at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as possible. The purpose of the meeting is to
hold a public hearing on proposed amendments to the Apple Valley park dedication
requirements. The proposed amendments relate to benchmark values of raw land and the
persons per unit ratio.
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that these proceedings are instituted by the City of
Apple Valley. All interested parties will be given an opportunity to be heard at said time and
place.
DATED this 24th day of April, 2015.
B
Pamela J. Gack tter, City CTerk
::00
*000
••• ITEM:
City of Apple COUNCIL MEETING DATE: May 7, 2015
Valley SECTION: Regular Agenda
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Kelley Park Amenities Discussion
STAFF CONTACT: DEPARTMENTIDIVISION:
Barry Bernstein, Director Parks and Recreation Department
Action Requested
Motion recommending approval of a conditional use permit to allow the Apple Valley Arts
Foundation to place a storage container at Kelley Park behind the existing stage from June -August
2015.
Summary
Apple Valley Arts Foundation is requesting permission to place a temporary storage container at
Kelley Park behind the existing stage from June -August during the summer concert series and
Shakespearean performances. A conditional use permit is required. Staff is seeking Committee
recommendation.
Background
The Parks and Recreation Department has received a request from the Apple Valley Arts
Foundation to place a storage box behind the existing performance stage at Kelley Park for the
majority of the summer. It is believed the Apple Valley Arts Foundation will be storing items used
to support the 27 performances June -August at park. A similar storage container was brought on
site last summer, but for a shorter timeframe.
This issue has also been brought forth through the Planning process as the zoning code does not
allow the placement of a storage box. If recommended for approval by the Parks and Recreation
Committee, the City may still have to issue a conditional use permit to allow the storage container
to be located in Kelley Park for an extended period of time.
In the zoning code, if a use is not listed, it is not allowed. § 155.246, 155.247 and 155.248
do not list a temporary storage pod as a permitted use, accessory use or conditional use in
the "P" (Institutional) zoning district.
2. Temporary dumpsters and pods are only permitted in conjunction with construction
activities. § 155.247 (C) Accessory uses permitted in § 155.093 states: `Buildings, trailers,
unscreened trash dumpsters, or portable storage units temporarily located on the subject lot
only for the purposes of construction on the premises..."
3. Any accessory building or structure needs to be architecturally compatible with the
principal building on the property. § 155.248 "The exterior finish and materials of any
accessory building shall be architecturally compatible with the principle building, if any,
otherwise all buildings shall comply with exterior finish and materials regulations set forth
elsewhere in the code."
4. Any accessory building or structure needs to be permanent construction: § 155.346
(4) "Materials. Materials shall be those normally utilized in this part of the country for
permanent type construction, which are found in what is generally accepted as good
architectural design and which are found to be compatible with nearby existing buildings.
Required building materials shall depend upon the use of the building..."
5. § 155.332 (I) "All accessory buildings and structures shall be suitably anchored to the
ground."
It is staff s recommendation to grant a conditional use permit allowing the Apple Valley Arts
Foundation to place a storage container at Kelley Park behind the existing stage from June -August
in support of the summer concert series, as well as Apple Valley Live the Shakespearean
performing series for the summer of 2015.
Budget Impact
N/A
Attachment(s)
N/A
Approximate Exterior Dimensions:
• Length:8'
• Width:5'
• Height: 7'6" (7'10" w/ vinyl cover installed)
http://www.uhaul.com/Reservations/Images/Equipment[Ubox/uboxLarge.png 4/28/2015
• Soo
City of Apple
Valley
ITEM:
COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
SECTION:
May 7, 2015
Regular Agenda
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Cedar Isle Park Organized Field Use
STAFF CONTACT:
DEPARTMENTIDIVISION:
Barry Bernstein, Director
Parks and Recreation Department
Action Requested
Motion Regarding Cedar Isle Park Organized Field Use.
Summary
Aware of unauthorized field striping being done within Cedar Isle Park, staff is seeking direction
as to the continuation of the long standing relationship with the neighborhood and the future of the
park space.
Background
It has been reported to the Parks and Recreation Department that unauthorized lacrosse field
striping is happening within Cedar Isle Park. There has been a long standing relationship with the
neighborhood that there would be no scheduled organized activities held within this park. After
conducting research, staff could not secure written documentation to memorialize this
arrangement; however, staff has been operating under the premise of no organized scheduled
activity in this neighborhood park for over twenty years.
Staff contacted the responsible organization officials and informed them of the neighborhood
relationship. The organization was agreeable to discontinuing the practice of marking a lacrosse
field at Cedar Isle Park. Unfortunately, since then, it has been reported this practice has continued.
Staff is seeking direction from the Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee as to continuing the
practice of not scheduling any organized activity in this park or, due to demand of fields,
rethinking our current relationship with the neighborhood and making available this space on a
scheduled basis for organized activities.
Budget Impact
N/A
Attachment(s)
Cedar Isle Park Map
Dakota County GI Applications , ` Tools ,_T Print O Sign In
s 'b
' k �
milli
e i
a _-
q'
'Wr
z
- �199 -. �,.• Ca^iAWY.i .,,,� .. �' _ < ,� � Overview
64
0666
•0• ITEM:
City of Apple COUNCIL MEETING DATE: May 7, 2015
Valley SECTION: Regular Agenda
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
Quarry Point Park Soccer Field #7 Lighting
STAFF CONTACT: DEPARTMENTIDIVISION:
Barry Bernstein, Director Parks and Recreation Department
Action Requested
Motion Recommending Quarry Point Park Field #7 Lighting Option.
Summary
Staff is seeking Committee approval to use park dedication fees not to exceed $185,000 to place
field lighting at Quarry Point #7.
Background
With the ever increasing pressure for additional activity space, the Parks and Recreation
Department has been investigating opportunities to increase locations or to maximize current play
field opportunities. One opportunity is to place additional field lighting at Quarry Point field #7.
With only two lighted open play fields in our community, the pressure on these field is ever
increasing, and it's difficult to conduct any repair on the fields due to demand. With the additional
field lighting at Quarry Point Park field #7, the Parks and Recreation staff will have the ability to
better manage use of neighborhood parks by organized activities, as well as develop a better turf
management plan by being able to adjust fields in a larger space and take some pressure off of
other play fields.
When the field lights on Quarry Point field #8 were installed, the intention was to eventually place
additional field lighting on field #7. The light fixtures on field #8 are equipped with brackets that
can accommodate additional light fixtures for field number #7.
Staff has identified three options for field lighting:
1) Install additional lights on the west side of the field #8 poles and add two new poles
with lights to the west side of field #7 not sized for future lighting on field #6. The cost of
this project is estimated at $149,000 plus some expenses for electrical work.
2) Install additional lights on the west side of the field #8 poles and add two new poles
with lights to the west side of field #7 sized and designed for future lighting on field #6.
The cost of this project is estimated at $162,000 plus some expenses for electrical work.
3) Maintain status quo and not add any additional lighting at this time.
Budget Impact
Up to $185,000 from Park Dedication Fee.
Attachment(s)
N/A
1
CPO
Z:7
PILOT K1408 ROAD
1
M" OWAV4P" k ti
Print Preview
Page 1 of I
Dakota County, MN
Disc(a/mar Hap and paraN daG are Ireirered to !K •cnmeh, fwlsaarcny sTrot puaranfaM. Ma is nor • kpa! documenrend should not 6e substituted h+a f4k Map Scale
w,ch,apprcissl, survey, or tear ronrny verification. OeXeG 6unrV esaunv no legal rcsponsibiFty for Me inhrmeden coMeJnW in M:s deG. 1 i h = IW feet
4/30/2015
http://gis.co.dakota.mn.uslDCGIS[WebFormsIPrint.aspx?img=http:Hgis.co.dakota.mn.usIC... 4/30/2015
., . . ... ti sr.5#r,'9'E„�' ,�.� y,+ va.: 3. r ,^L^^r P'•.ww..�- .- f .. °"�'�� ' �+wM
st