Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2021-05-05 Agenda Packet
M eeting L ocation: M unicipal Center 7100 147th Street West Apple Valley, M innesota 55124 Planning Commission meetings have resumed at the Municipal C enter and are open to the public with physical distancing restrictions. Attendee procedures and access inf ormation are posted on the C ity's website and include virtual participation opportunities. May 5, 2021 PLA N N IN G C O MMISSIO N T EN TAT IVE A G EN D A 7:00 P M 1.Call to Order A.Planning Commissioners will be attending either in-person or virtually. A roll-call will be taken. 2.Approve Agenda 3.Approve Consent Agenda Items Consent Agenda Items are considered routine and will be enacted with a single motion, without discussion, unless a commissioner or citizen requests to have any item separately considered. It will then be moved to the land use/action items for consideration. A.Approve Minutes of April 21, 2021, Regular Meeting. B.Eagle Brook Church - PC21-09-PZ C onsider C omprehensive Plan Land Use Map amendment re-designating 13.86 acres from "C " (C ommercial) to "IN ST " (Institutional) and zoning amendment to add church to the list of permitted uses in Planned Development No.646/Zone 1 LO C AT IO N: 14960 Florence Trail PET IT IO N ER: Eagle Brook Church and Menard, Inc. 4.Public Hearings 5.Land Use / Action Items A.Texas Roadhouse Restaurant - PC 21-13-B C onsider Site Plan/Building Permit Authorization to Allow for C onstruction of a 7,750-sq. ft. Restaurant LO C AT IO N: Northwest Corner of 157th Street West and Pilot Knob Road PET IO N ER: HJ Development, LLP and Rockport, LLC B.C ider Ridge Marketplace/Hope Alliance 2nd Addition - PC 21-02-ZC BF 1. Amend Draft Planned Development (PD) to allow drive-thru window service in conjunction with a Class III Restaurant 2. Conditional Use Permit (C UP) for Drive-T hru Window In C onjunction with a C lass III Restaurant 3. Site Plan Review/Building Permit Authorization for Construction of a 7,420 sq. ft. Multi-Tenant Office Building on Lot 2, Hope Alliance 2nd Addition Location: 7477 - 145th Street West (Northeast C orner Cedar Ave and 145th Street W.) Petitioner: Hempel C ompanies and Hope C hurch of C and M Alliance 6.Other Business A.Review of Upcoming Schedule and Other Updates Planning Commission - Wednesday, May 19, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. Planning Commission - Wednesday, J une 2, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. C ity Council - T hursday, May 13, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. C ity Council - T hursday, May 27, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. 7.Adjourn Regular meetings are broadcast, live, on C harter C ommunications C able C hannel 180 and on the C ity's website at www.cityof applevalley.org I T E M: P L A NNI NG C O MMI S S I O N ME E T I NG D AT E:May 5, 2021 S E C T I O N:Special Notification Description: Planning Commission meetings have resumed at the Municipal Center and are open to the public with physical distancing restrictions. Attendee procedures and access information are posted on the City's website and include virtual participation opportunities. S taff Contact: B reanna Vincent, Department Assistant Department / Division: Community Development Department AC T I O N RE Q UE S T E D: Please let us know you have joined us by either signing at the door or requesting to be an attendee on-line. S UM M ARY: Note: Planning C ommission meetings have resumed at the Municipal C enter and are open to the public with physical distancing restrictions. B AC K G RO UND: N/A B UD G E T I M PAC T: N/A I T E M: 1.A. P L A NNI NG C O MMI S S I O N ME E T I NG D AT E :May 5, 2021 S E C T I O N:Call to Order Description: P lanning Commissioners will be attending either in-person or virtually. A roll-call will be taken. S taff Contact: B reanna Vincent, Department Assistant Department / Division: Community Development Department AC T I O N RE Q UE S T E D: N/A S UM M ARY: During the C O VID-19 Pandemic, the Council C hambers in the Apple Valley Municipal Building has been set-up to allow for the Planning C ommissioners to attend meetings either in-person (observing social distancing in accordance with Emergency Executive Order 20-81) or virtually (via GoToMeeting). A roll-call will be taken. B AC K G RO UND: N/A B UD G E T I M PAC T: N/A I T E M: 3.A. P L A NNI NG C O MMI S S I O N ME E T I NG D AT E:May 5, 2021 S E C T I O N:Consent A genda Description: A pprove Minutes of A pril 21, 2021, Regular Meeting. S taff Contact: B reanna Vincent, Department Assistant Department / Division: Community Development Department AC T I O N RE Q UE S T E D: Approve minutes of regular meeting of April 21, 2021. S UM M ARY: T he minutes of the last regular Planning Commission meeting is attached for your review and approval. B AC K G RO UND: State statute requires the creation and preservation of meeting minutes which document the official actions and proceedings of public governing bodies. B UD G E T I M PAC T: N/A AT TAC HM E NT S : Minutes CITY OF APPLE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES April 21, 2021 1. CALL TO ORDER The City of Apple Valley Planning Commission Meeting was called to order by Chair Burke at 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Chair Tim Burke, Jodi Kurtz, David Schindler, Paul Scanlan, and Philip Mahowald. Member(s) Absent: Keith Deikmann City staff members attending: Community Develo pment Director Bruce Nordquist, City Planner Tom Lovelace, City Planner Alex Sharpe, City Attorney Sharon Hills, and Department Assistant Breanna Vincent. 2. A. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Chair Burke asked if there were any changes to the agenda. Community Development Director Bruce Nordquist advised there were two changes. The first is a change in the order of the agenda with the Election of Officers being moved to item 2. B. The second change is the addition of an email message received from a resident concerning Eagle Brook Church. MOTION: Commissioner Schindler moved, seconded by Commissioner Scanlan, approving the agenda. Roll call vote: Ayes - 5 – Nays - 0. B. NOMINATE AND APPROVE OFFICERS Commissioner Scanlan nominated Tim Burke for Chair. MOTION: Commissioner Schindler moved, seconded by Commissioner Scanlan, approving Tim Burke for Chair. Roll call vote: Ayes - 5 – Nays - 0. Commissioner Scanlan nominated himself for Vice-Chair. Commissioner Kurtz nominated herself for Vice-Chair. A ballot process was administered to the Commissioners by City Attorney Sharon Hills. Commissioner Kurtz was nominated as Vice-Chair by majority vote. Commissioner Scanlan nominated Commissioner Schindler for Secretary. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes April 21, 2021 Page 2 of 6 MOTION: Commissioner Scanlan moved, seconded by Chair Burke, approving David Schindler for Chair. Roll call vote: Ayes - 5 – Nays - 0. 3. CONSENT ITEMS MOTION: Commissioner Scanlan moved, seconded by Commissioner Kurtz, approving the minutes of the meeting of April 7, 2021. Roll call vote: Ayes – 5 – Nays – 0. 4. PUBLIC HEARING A. Eagle Brook Church Planner Tom Lovelace presented the staff report. Chair Burke asked if there was potential to change the entrance to the lot on Flagstaff Ave. Planner Lovelace responded that it becomes problematic because of the elevation and grades on Flagstaff. Once the traffic analysis is conducted, the option for other entrances could be explored. Commissioner Kurtz asked where the entrance would be and if they would be occupying the entire building. Planner Lovelace advised that they would be tearing down the existing entrance of the building. Eagle Brook would be occupying the building. They currently have temporary operations in Lakeville, which would not continue once the Menards site is completed. Commissioner Scanlan asked if the access points to the Sam’s Club area would be discontinued. Planner Lovelace advised that the Petitioner would be discussing with Sam’s Club in order to keep those access points. Commissioner Scanlan expressed concerns over the access point in front of the Sam’s Club walkway and the increase in traffic. Planner Lovelace advised that the traffic would be changing with going from a large retail space to a smaller church. There would be different peaks depending on when the church services occur. The traffic analysis will give more details. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes April 21, 2021 Page 3 of 6 Commissioner Kurtz asked whether a turn in lane could be added from Flagstaff. Planner Lovelace advised he would not be able to answer at this time and information from the traffic analysis would need to be gathered. Commissioner Mahowald spoke about complimentary traffic where business in the Planned Development could feed off of each other and whether the traffic study could extend to how the traffic flow would be an enhancement or a detriment for surrounding businesses. Have any other options been proposed to fill the space? Planner Lovelace advised that he could ask Menards for information on other prospects. The traffic study may show how the background traffic may be affected with the addition of a church to the area. Petitioner Stephanie Hauber provided a brief presentation on Eagle Brook Church and its other locations. Commissioner Schindler asked whether the Lakeville site would close. Petitioner Hauber advised that as permanent sites are opened, the mobile sites close. Commissioner Schindler asked how many attendees are currently at the Lakeville South site. Petitioner Hauber responded that there are 200-300 attendees including children. Commissioner Schindler asked whether there were any services or programs occurring during weekdays. Petitioner Hauber advised that there were very minimal programs during the week. There would likely be 10-15 staff members going in and out of the week. There is a youth program on Wednesday nights. Services are typically occurring on Saturdays and Sundays. Commissioner Kurtz asked why they would want to remove the front of the building and wouldn’t they want to keep that space for more square footage. Petitioner Hauber advised that they like the natural light and openness improves the aesthetic of the building, though it is not a requirement for them to remove the front of the building. Commissioner Kurtz mentioned the 11:00 am Sunday service may cause some concerns for traffic flow with Sam’s Club. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes April 21, 2021 Page 4 of 6 Community Development Director Nordquist asked whether there was any activity outdoors particularly on the north side of the building. Petitioner Hauber advised that they do not have any outdoor services. The back of the building will be soundproofed as well. Planner Lovelace read an email received from resident Anita Burke opposing Eagle Brook Church at the former Menards location. With no further comments, Chair Burke closed the public hearing. 5. LAND USE A. Orchard Path Phase Two Planner Tom Lovelace presented the staff report. Commissioner Scanlan asked how the flow of materials and parking for construction will be handled with the close proximity to the park. Planner Lovelace advised that he spoke with Parks and Recreation and storage of materials will not be allowed in the park parking lot. Community Development Director Nordquist advised that residents within 350’ were notified of the plan as well as various homeowner’s associations. Planner Lovelace noted that a resident on Eddington Way had reached out via email and wanted information on when construction would be starting. She also mentioned that there was a lot of dust with the construction of the initial building and wanted this to be handled with the new construction. Project Developer Pamela Belz showed a brief presentation. Commissioner Scanlan asked why the outdoor seating area is not going to be added in the courtyard of the new building. Project Developer Belz advised that the area is to be kept as green space for various activities for residents such as adding a putting green. Chair Burke asked if there were any further questions for the Petitioner. Virtual Attendee Debby Reisinger commented that there were only plans for adding two spaces for electric car charging and that she believes there should be more spaces. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes April 21, 2021 Page 5 of 6 Planner Lovelace advised that there was nothing in the code requiring a specific number of electric car charging stations. Project Developer Belz advised that in Phase 1, there are 132 parking spaces and that they could look into adding more electric car charging spaces there. MOTION: Chair Burke moved, seconded by Commissioner Kurtz, approving the site plan/building permit authorization to allow construction of a 60-unit addition to Orchard Path Continuum-of-Care facility. Roll call vote: Ayes - 6 – Nays - 0. B. Consider Ordinance Amendments Related to Special Events, Temporary Signage, and Mobile Food Units Planner Alex Sharpe presented the staff report. Chair Burke asked whether a memo would need to be submitted if you had a group of 10 people going on a power ride through the city as he believes it is unlikely they would do so. City Attorney Hills interjected that it would be dependent on whether the bike ride was categorized as an “event” such as a rally as opposed to a weekly night ride with friends. MOTION: Commissioner Scanlan moved, seconded by Commissioner Schindler, approving the ordinance amendment related to special events, temporary signage, and mobile food units. Roll call vote: Ayes - 5 – Nays - 0. 6. OTHER BUSINESS A. Review of Upcoming Schedule and Other Updates The next Planning Commission meeting is Wednesday, May 5, 2021, 7:00 p.m. The next City Council meeting is Thursday, April 22, 2021, 7:00 p.m. 7. ADJOURNMENT Hearing no further comments from the Planning Staff or Planning Commission, Chair Burke asked for a motion to adjourn. MOTION: Commissioner Schindler moved, seconded by Commissioner Kurtz, to adjourn the meeting at 8:30 p.m. Roll call vote: Ayes – 5 – Nays – 0. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes April 21, 2021 Page 6 of 6 Respectfully submitted, ______________________________________ Breanna Vincent, Planning Department Assistant Approved by the Apple Valley Planning Commission on 5/5/2021 . Tim Burke, Chair I T E M: 3.B. P L A NNI NG C O MMI S S I O N ME E T I NG D AT E:May 5, 2021 S E C T I O N:Consent A genda Description: E agle Brook Church - P C21-09-P Z Consider Comprehensive Plan L and Use Map amendment re-designating 13.86 acres from "C" (Commercial) to "I NS T " (I nstitutional) and zoning amendment to add church to the list of permitted uses in P lanned Development No.646/Zone 1 S taff Contact: Thomas L ovelace, City Planner Department / Division: Community Development Department Applicant: E agle Brook Church and Menard, I nc. P roject Number: P C21-09-P Z Applicant Date: 3/22/2021 60 Days: 5/21/2021 120 Days: 7/20/2021 AC T I O N RE Q UE S T E D: N/A S UM M ARY: T he applicant has requested that this item be postponed until J uly 21, 2021, Planning Commission meeting so that they can prepare a traffic study for review by the City. B AC K G RO UND: N/A B UD G E T I M PAC T: N/A AT TAC HM E NT S : Correspondence I T E M: 5.A. P L A NNI NG C O MMI S S I O N ME E T I NG D AT E :May 5, 2021 S E C T I O N:L and Use / Action I tems Description: Texas Roadhouse Restaurant - P C21-13-B S taff Contact: Thomas L ovelace, City Planner Department / Division: Community Development Department Applicant: HJ Development, L L P and Rockport, L L C P roject Number: P C21-13-B Applicant Date: 4/21/2021 60 Days: 6/19/2021 120 Days: 8/18/2021 AC T I O N RE Q UE S T E D: Recommend site plan/building permit authorization approval to allow for construction of a 7,750-sq. ft. building on a 2.33-acre lot described as Lot 1, Block 1, Orchard Place 2nd Addition, according to the approved preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. Issuance of a building permit shall be contingent on the recording of the Orchard Place 2nd Addition final plat with Dakota C ounty. 2. Construction shall occur in conformance with the site plan dated April 21, 2021. 3. A sidewalk shall be installed along the east side of the right-turn only private drive, from 157th Street West to the sidewalk along the south side of Lot 4, Orchard Place 2nd Addition. 4. A bicycle rack shall be installed in front of the building. 5. Construction shall occur in conformance with the elevation plans dated April 9, 2021. 6. All necessary mechanical protrusions visible to the exterior shall be screened or handled in accordance with Section 155.346 (3)(a)(b) of the city code. 7. Construction shall occur in conformance with the landscape plan dated April 21, 2021; subject to submission of a detailed landscape planting price list for verification of the City’s 2.5% landscaping requirement at the time of building permit application. 8. Site grading shall occur in conformance with a N atural Resources Management Plan (N RMP) which shall include final grading plan to be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer. 9. Installation of utilities shall occur in conformance with a final utility plan to be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer. 10. Any site lighting shall consist of downcast, shoebox lighting fixtures or wallpacks with deflector shields which confines the light to the property and shall meet all applicable requirements set forth in Section 155.353 of the city code. 11. A separate application and signage plan in conformance with C hapter 154 of the city code must be submitted to the C ity for review and approval prior to the erection of any signs. S UM M ARY: For your consideration is a request from HJ Development, LLP, and Rockport, LLC , for site plan/building permit authorization to allow for construction of a 7,750-sq. ft. restaurant on a 2.33-acre lot. T he site is part of the 34-acre Orchard Place commercial development, which is bounded by 155th Street West to the north, Pilot Knob Road to the east, 157th Street West to the south and Pulte's Orchard Place townhome development to the west. B AC K G RO UND: Comprehensiv e P lan: T he subject property is currently guided “C” (C ommercial). T his designation includes a wide variety of retail, office, and service uses that vary in intensity and off-site impacts. T he C ity uses the zoning ordinance to regulate the intensity and characteristics of development. Lower-intensity districts include Limited Business and Neighborhood C ommercial. Higher-intensity districts include General Business and Retail. In each district, land use and performance standards set parameters for development. Examples include parking, building setbacks, infiltrations, site access, and lot coverage. T he proposed Class I restaurant use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation. Zoning: T he property is zoned “RB” (Retail Business). Retail business districts are described as areas that are centrally located to serve the need for general retail sales. Permitted uses include stores and shops that sell personal services or goods over the counter, as well as banks, savings and loan offices, professional offices, community facilities, health clubs, animal hospitals and clinics, small engine and appliance repair, commercial recreation, auto accessory sales, and restaurants (C lass I and III Neighborhood Restaurant without a drive through window, only). C onditional uses include a wide variety such as C lass II restaurants, car wash operations and drive-through window service. Permitted accessory uses include delivery bays and outdoor dining areas. Submitted information identifies a proposed C lass I restaurant on Lot 1, Orchard Place 2nd Addition, which is a permitted use in the "RB" zoning district. T hey also would like to serve alcohol at the restaurant, which is a conditional use in this zoning district. T hey will be submitting an application for a conditional use permit and a public hearing will be scheduled for a future Planning Commission meeting. Site P lan: T he site is part of the 9.5-acre first phase of a 34-acre commercial development. A 6,500-sq. ft. car wash facility on Lot 3 and two multi-tenant buildings on Lot 4 have already received city approval. T he submitted plans indicate the location of a 7,750-sq. ft. C lass I restaurant and 165 parking spaces on a 2.33-acre lot. Access to the site will be via a right-turn only access drive from 157th Street West and a private north/south street that will be connected to 155th and 157th Streets West, which are public streets. A cross access and parking agreement shall be required that allows all the lots and outlots within Orchard Place 2nd Addition access to all internal streets and parking areas contained within the development. T he proposed development meets all building and parking setbacks. Grading P lan: T he site has been graded as part of the sand and gravel mining reclamation of the site. Minor grade adjustments to accommodate the proposed buildings and parking lot will be needed prior to construction. Any site grading shall occur in conformance with a Natural Resources Management Plan (N RMP) which shall be issued upon review and approval of a final grading plan by the C ity Engineer. Elev ation Drawings: T he exterior finish of the restaurant will include a fiber-cement siding, brick veneer, metal flashing and a metal roof. C ity code requires commercial buildings to have a vertical exposed exterior finish of 100% non-combustible, non-degradable and maintenance-free construction materials (such as face brick or natural stone but excluding such construction materials as sheet or corrugated aluminum, iron, or concrete block of any kind or similar). Exterior rooftop finishes shall preclude the use of exposed or plated metal; any metal surface shall be coated or anodized with a non-reflective, glare-free finish. T he proposed exterior finish will meet the code requirements. T here has been some concern about the use of fiber-cement siding as the primary material and whether it meets city code requirements. T he Uniform Building Code defines masonry as a form of construction composed of stone, brick, concrete, gypsum, tile, glass block or other materials laid up unit by unit and set in mortar. Although fiber cement products are installed with nails, like most masonry materials, they are primarily cement with performance characteristics similar to brick, stucco and stone. T hese characteristics include fire, moisture and insect resistance. Many cities include fiber-cement in their masonry definitions. T herefore, the material appears to meet the requirements set forth in the zoning code. T he submitted drawings do not show the location of the mechanical equipment to serve the buildings. C ity code requires that all necessary mechanical protrusions visible to the exterior shall be screened or handled in a manner such that they are not visually obvious and are compatible with the surrounding development. For rooftop mechanical equipment, all mechanical equipment and related appurtenances, except solar collector panels, must be fully screened by either a parapet wall along the edge of the building or by a screen immediately surrounding such equipment. T he height of the parapet wall or screen shall be at least the height of the equipment. Parapet walls must be an extension of the primary building materials comprising the outside walls of the building; screens must be constructed of durable, low-maintenance materials and be either a light, neutral color or the same color as the primary building materials of the outside walls. Rooftop equipment shall be set back from the edge of the roof along the front building face a minimum of one times the equipment height. For ground mounted equipment, all mechanical equipment and related appurtenances must be fully screened by either a masonry wall or an opaque landscape screen. T he height of the wall or landscape screen shall be at least the height of the equipment. Masonry walls must be constructed of the same materials and color as the primary materials comprising the outside walls of the building; landscape screening must be of plant materials that are fully opaque year-round. Equipment shall be painted a neutral earth-tone color. All mechanical protrusions shall be pointed out on the site plan and elevations. Landscape P lan: T he submitted landscape plan identifies a wide and diverse variety of plantings. Staff has reviewed the landscape plan and has no outstanding comments. Adjustments will need to be made to the most westerly landscaped parking to accommodate for the recommended sidewalk City code requires that the minimum cost of landscaping materials (live plant material excluding sod) for commercial projects shall be 2.5% of the estimated building construction cost based on Means construction data. A detailed planting price list shall be required for verification of the C ity’s 2.5% landscaping requirement at the time of submission of plans for a building permit. Av ailability of Municipal Utilities: A sanitary sewer connection will be made to the existing line located with private drive right-of-way and water will be extended to the property from an existing watermain located along the south side of the property. Storm sewer lines have been installed throughout the O rchard Place commercial development that will collect runoff and transport it to the ponding areas in Outlots A and C , Orchard Place 2nd Addition. C onnections to the existing storm sewer lines will be made that will collect and transport storm from the site to the ponding areas. All utilities shall be designed and constructed in accordance with adopted C ity standards and in conformance with a final utility plan to be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer. Street Classifications/Accesses/Circulation: T he site abuts Pilot Knob Road to the east and 157th Street West to the south. Pilot Knob Road is classified as an A Minor Expander and 157th Street West is classified a Minor Collectors. Streets and traffic control shall be designed, constructed and installed in accordance with adopted C ity standards. Direct access from Pilot Knob Road will not be allowed. Access to 157th Street West will be via two north/south private streets. T he most easterly connection will be a right-in only and the westerly intersection will be a full access intersection. T he most westerly private street will be extended north and intersect with 155th Street West. Staff has no issues with the proposed accesses and private street location. P edestrian Access: T he site plan shows a sidewalk that makes a connection to the bituminous path along the west side of Pilot Knob Road. No sidewalk connection from the site to the pathway along the north side 157th Street West. T he location of the trash enclosure becomes a barrier to creating a connection. Staff is proposing that a sidewalk be installed along the east side of the right-turn in only drive lane from 157th Street West to the sidewalk at the south side of Lot 4. Signs: T he applicant has submitted a site plan that identifies illuminated building signage that will be on all four side of the structure, and a monument sign at the in the northwest corner of the site near the right-turn in only drive approach. A "To-Go" sign will be placed in a window along the north side of the building to identify order pick-up area. A smaller illuminated "Texas Roadhouse" sign is proposed to be located just above the main entrance to the building on the the north side. A development sign, which will be constructed by others, is identified at the southeast corner. Formal sign applications for this project and the development sign will need to be submitted, reviewed and approved prior to the placement of any signs. All signage shall conform to the City’s sign ordinance. Lighting P lan: No formal lighting plan has been submitted with this application. T he building elevations show wall mounted lighting fixture locations and white LED piping around the edges of certain sections of the building's elevations. All building and site lighting shall conform with Section 155.353 of the zoning code, which requires that any lighting used to illuminate an off-street parking area or sign shall be arranged so as to deflect light away from any adjoining residential zone or from the public streets. Direct glare from floodlights or similar sources, shall not be directed into any adjoining property or public streets, and all the source of all lights shall be hooded or controlled in some manner so as not to light adjacent property. Mitigative measures shall be employed to limit glare and spill light to protect neighboring parcels and to maintain traffic safety on public roads. T hese measures shall include lenses, shields, louvers, prismatic control devices and limitations on the height and type of fixtures. T he city may also limit the hours of operation of outdoor lighting if it is deemed necessary to reduce impacts on the surrounding neighborhood. In commercial areas, any light or combination of lights that cast light on any adjacent commercial or industrial property shall not exceed one foot candle as measured at the property line. B UD G E T I M PAC T: N/A AT TAC HM E NT S : L ocation Map Comp Plan Map Z oning Map Plan S et Elevations F loor Plan Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s p e c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a t i o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . SHEET NUMBER 20 1 8 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 76 7 E U S T I S S T R E E T , S U I T E 1 0 0 , S T . P A U L , M N 5 5 1 1 4 PH O N E : 6 5 1 - 6 4 5 - 4 1 9 7 WW W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ A V R - O r c h a r d P l a c e \ H J D e v e l o p m e n t - 2 n d A d d i t i o n L o t s 3 a n d 4 \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ T R H \ C 0 - C O V E R S H E E T . d w g A p r i l 2 0 , 2 0 2 1 - 2 : 0 2 p m BY RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E PR E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N DA T E : I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S P L A N , SP E C I F I C A T I O N O R R E P O R T W A S P R E P A R E D B Y ME O R U N D E R M Y D I R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N A N D TH A T I A M A D U L Y L I C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L EN G I N E E R U N D E R T H E L A W S O F T H E S T A T E O F MI N N E S O T A . MN LI C . N O . WI L L I A M D . M A T Z E K , P . E . 04 / 2 1 / 2 0 2 1 45 7 9 0 DA T E CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T 16 0 9 7 5 0 0 1 04 / 2 1 / 2 0 2 1 AS S H O W N AC L AC L WD M NORTH VICINITY N.T.S. SITE APPLE VALLEY, DAKOTA COUNTY, MN 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM THAT THE EXISTING CONDITIONS FOR THE SITE MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS INCLUDED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2.IF REPRODUCED, THE SCALES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON A 22x34 SHEET. 3.ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICES COMPANIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO ANNOUNCED BUILDING POSSESSION AND THE FINAL CONNECTION OF SERVICES. 4.ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS. NOTES: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. MITCHELL COOKAS, P.L.A. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100 ST.PAUL, MN 55114 TELEPHONE (651) 645-4197 PROJECT TEAM: OWNER ROCKPORT, LLC PETE FISCHER 14698 GALAXIE AVE. APPLE VALLEY, MN 55124 TELEPHONE: (952) 997-9100 ENGINEER KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. PREPARED BY: WILLIAM D. MATZEK, P.E. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100 ST. PAUL, MN 55114 TELEPHONE (651) 645-4197 OWNER / DEVELOPER HJ DEVELOPMENT, LLP CHRIS MOE 15600 WAYZATA BLVD, SUITE 201 WAYZATA, MN 55391 TELEPHONE: (952) 476-9400 ORCHARD PLACE 2ND ADDITION LOT 1 SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 115N, RANGE 20W FOR SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS Know what'sbelow. before you dig.Call ARCHITECT GREENBERG FARROW BRANDON GOLDBERG 21 SOUTH EVERGREEN AVE. SUITE 200 ARLINGTON HEIGHTS, IL 60005 TELEPHONE: (847) 788-9200 SURVEYOR PROBE ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC. RUSSELL P DAMLO, P.L.S. 1000 EAST 146TH STREET BURNSVILLE, MN 55337 TELEPHONE: (952) 432-3000 PR E P A R E D F O R CO V E R S H E E T C000 OR C H A R D P L A C E 2 N D AD D I T I O N L O T 1 HJ D E V E L O P M E N T , LL P AP P L E V A L L E Y MN 160TH ST W FL A G S T A F F A V E PI L O T K N O B R D 150TH ST W DRAWING INDEX Sheet Number Sheet Title C000 COVER SHEET C400 SITE PLAN C500 GRADING PLAN C600 UTILITY PLAN L100 LANDSCAPE PLAN L101 LANDSCAPE DETAILS ST O P STOP ST O P ST O P ST O P STOP ST O P ST O P ST O P 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 991010 101010 2 2 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 8 910 11111111 11 12 13 1313 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 14 14 14 14 14 14 9.0' 9.0' 9.0' 9. 0 ' 9.0' 9.0' 9.0' 9. 0 ' 9. 0 ' 18.5' 18 . 5 ' 24 . 0 ' 40 . 0 ' 24 . 0 ' 18 . 5 ' 24.0' 18 . 5 ' 24 . 0 ' 20 . 0 ' 25 . 0 ' 40 . 0 ' 24 . 0 ' 40 . 0 ' 24 . 0 ' 24.0' 25.0' 25.0' 24.0' 6. 5 ' 2 6. 2 ' 5. 0 ' DEVELOPMENT SIGN GREASE TRAP TRANSFORMER EXISTING RIGHT-IN ONLY ACCESS PROPOSED RESTAURANT 7,750 SF 25 ' P A R K I N G S E T B A C K 50 ' B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K 25' PARKING SETBACK 50' BUILDING SETBACK PR O P E R T Y L I N E PR O P E R T Y L I N E 5' P A R K I N G S E T B A C K 15 ' B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K PROPERTY LINE 5' PARKING SETBACK 15' BUILDING SETBACK PI L O T K N O B R D . 157TH STREET W. 13 FLUSH CURB B612 TO FLUSH CURB TRANSITION 13 13 13 B612 TO FLUSH CURB TRANSITION 18.5' DA T E : I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S P L A N , SP E C I F I C A T I O N O R R E P O R T W A S P R E P A R E D B Y ME O R U N D E R M Y D I R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N A N D TH A T I A M A D U L Y L I C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L EN G I N E E R U N D E R T H E L A W S O F T H E S T A T E O F MI N N E S O T A . MN LI C . N O . WI L L I A M D . M A T Z E K , P . E . 04 / 2 1 / 2 0 2 1 45 7 9 0 DA T E CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T 16 0 9 7 5 0 0 1 04 / 2 1 / 2 0 2 1 AS S H O W N AC L AC L WD M BUILDING DATA SUMMARY AREAS PROPOSED PROPERTY 2.33 AC BUILDING AREA 7,750 SF (7.6% OF TOTAL PROPERTY AREA) PARKING MAXIMUM # OF SEATS ALLOWED 412 SEATS PROPOSED PARKING 165 SPACES @ 21.29 RATIO ADA STALLS REQ'D / PROVIDED 6 STALLS / 6 STALLS PROPERTY SUMMARY ORCHARD PLACE 2ND ADDITION LOT 1 TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 2.33 AC ZONING SUMMARY EXISTING ZONING RETAIL BUSINESS PROPOSED ZONING RETAIL BUSINESS PARKING SETBACKS SIDE/REAR = 5' ROAD = 25' BUILDING SETBACKS FRONT = 50' SIDE = 15' REAR = 15' PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER PROPERTY LINE SETBACK LINE PROPOSED STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK LEGEND PROPOSED HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT KEYNOTE LEGEND CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER. (PER LOCAL CODES) MATCH EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT/CURB & GUTTER/SIDEWALK PROPOSED PRIVATE DRIVE PAVEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK. 2% MAX. CROSS SLOPE AND 5% MAX STRAIGHT SLOPE (PER LOCAL CODES) CONCRETE WHEEL STOP STOP BAR AND STOP SIGN. (PER LOCAL CODES) DIRECTIONAL TRAFFIC ARROW. (PER LOCAL CODES) PARKING STALL STRIPING. (PER LOCAL CODES) 4" WIDE PAINTED STRIPES, 2' OFF CENTER @ 45° HANDICAP STRIPING & SYMBOL. (TYPICAL-PER ADA AND LOCAL REQUIREMENTS) HANDICAP SIGNS. (TYPICAL-PER ADA AND LOCAL REQUIREMENTS) DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE. (REF. ARCH. PLANS) LANDSCAPE AREA. (PER LANDSCAPE PLAN) HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s p e c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a t i o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . SHEET NUMBER 20 1 8 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 76 7 E U S T I S S T R E E T , S U I T E 1 0 0 , S T . P A U L , M N 5 5 1 1 4 PH O N E : 6 5 1 - 6 4 5 - 4 1 9 7 WW W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ A V R - O r c h a r d P l a c e \ H J D e v e l o p m e n t - 2 n d A d d i t i o n L o t s 3 a n d 4 \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ T R H \ C 4 - S I T E P L A N . d w g A p r i l 2 0 , 2 0 2 1 - 2 : 0 2 p m © BY RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E PR E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N SITE PLAN NOTES 1.ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CITY/COUNTY REGULATIONS AND CODES AND O.S.H.A. STANDARDS. 2.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULES, SLOPE PAVING, SIDEWALKS, EXIT PORCHES, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS. 3.ALL INNER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE 3' AND OUTER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE 10' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. STRIPED RADII ARE TO BE 5'. 4.ALL DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5.EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE TO BE ABANDONED, REMOVED OR RELOCATED AS NECESSARY. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID. 6.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELOCATIONS, (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ALL UTILITIES, STORM DRAINAGE, SIGNS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS & POLES, ETC. AS REQUIRED. ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES REQUIREMENTS AND PROJECT SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY SUCH. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID. 7.PYLON / MONUMENT SIGNS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED BY OTHERS. SIGNS ARE SHOWN FOR GRAPHICAL & INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SIZE, LOCATION AND ANY REQUIRED PERMITS NECESSARY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PYLON / MONUMENT SIGN. 8.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL PLAN. 9.NO PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SUCH AS TREES OR SHRUBS, ABOVE AND UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES, OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING OR PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED ON PLANS OTHERWISE. 10.REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAILS. 11.REFER TO FINAL PLAT OR ALTA SURVEY FOR EXACT LOT AND PROPERTY BOUNDARY DIMENSIONS. 12.ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT. 13.ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT. 14.ALL PARKING STALLS TO BE 9' IN WIDTH AND 18' IN LENGTH UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. NORTH PR E P A R E D F O R SI T E P L A N C100 OR C H A R D P L A C E 2 N D AD D I T I O N L O T 1 HJ D E V E L O P M E N T , LL P AP P L E V A L L E Y MN D ST O P STOP D 9 3 8 9 3 8 937 938 939 940 941 942 94 2 94 2 9 4 3 94 3 94 3 94 2 94 1 9 4 0 9 4 0 93 9 94 0 93 9 938 937 937 938 937 938 938 9 3 8 9 3 9 94 0 9 4 0 941 941 941 94 1 941 941 94 1 94 1 941 94 0 939 938 938 939 9 4 0 9 3 9 9 4 0 9 4 0 9 4 1 940 9 4 1 94 1 94 1 94 1 94 2 94 2 9 4 1 9 4 0 942 9 4 1 9 4 0 93 9 942 942 94 2 94 2 942 94 1 941 940 939 938 937 939 938 94 2 9 4 1 94 1 94 1 94 0 9 3 9 93 9 93 9 939 9 3 8 939 93 8 93 9 939 939 9 3 8 1.6 1 % 1.25% 1.44 % 2 . 9 6 % 1.11% 1.72% 2. 2 1 % 1.30% 1. 5 2 % 1.51 % 1.6 0 % 1.6 7 % 3.03% 2.14% 2.79% 2.1 2 % 1. 7 0 % 2.13% 1.85% 2.0 9 % 1.57 % 1.90% 2.2 3 % 3. 2 5 % 2 . 9 4 % 2.9 2 % 2.2 9 % 2.7 8 % 2 . 4 7 % 2 . 3 2 % 2. 0 7 % 1.7 6 % 1.76% 1.73% 1.27% 2 . 1 1 % 2. 0 8 % 2.1 3 % 1.8 2 % 1.8 6 % 1. 4 6 % 1. 6 8 % 1. 6 8 % 1. 6 8 % 2. 2 8 % 1. 3 5 % 1. 2 8 % 1.26% 7 . 8 5 % 1 1 . 2 4 % 5.83 % 4.23% 3.82% 4.96 % 9 . 9 1 % 10 . 4 3 % 15 . 7 6 % 11 . 9 1 % 9. 2 5 % 7.38% 1. 6 1 % 1. 5 2 % 3.53% 2.21% 2.05 %3.87%3.75% 6.72% 9.71% 7.20% 4.8 6 % 7.1 1 % 5.05% 7.22% 22.11% 31.40% 5. 1 9 % 7 . 0 9 % 5. 6 6 % 1.95% 1. 6 7 % 1. 6 8 % 1. 6 8 % 1. 6 8 % 1. 6 8 % 1. 6 8 % ST-301 CBMH RE:940.54 IE:936.94 SE IE:936.94 NW ST-302 ROOF DRAIN IE:937.82 NW ST-300 WYE - CONNECT TO EXISTING PIPE IE:936.05 SE EXMH-100 CONNECT TO EXISTING STR-105 RE:938.24 IE:933.00 E ST-200 MH IE:933.35 E IE:933.35 S IE:933.35 N 100 LF - 18" SD @ 1.00% 88 LF - 12" SD @ 1.00% 89 LF - 12" SD @ 1.00% 26 LF - 12" SD @ 1.00% 157TH STREET W. ME:937.66 ME:938.08 ME:938.61 ME:939.13 ME:939.35 ME:939.86 ME:941.05 ME:939.97 ME:940.37 ME:939.00 ME:938.91 ME:940.28 ME:936.99 ME:937.88 G:942.00 G:941.58 G:941.40 G:941.22G:939.49 G:939.05 G:938.84 G:938.94 G:939.24 G:939.56 G:939.70 G:939.44 G:940.76 G:940.84 G:941.16 G:941.02 G:942.00 G:941.50 G:941.22 G:941.40 G:941.40 G:941.10 G:940.70 G:940.58 G:940.47 G:940.58 HP:940.00 G:938.75 G:938.37 G:938.66 G:939.25 G:939.48 G:939.71 G:940.49 G:940.60 G:940.71 G:940.60 G:941.19 G:941.08 G:940.97 G:941.08 G:940.88 G:941.10 G:941.31 G:941.10 G:940.30 G:940.89 G:941.68 G:941.04 G:941.39 G:941.94 G:941.77 G:941.73 G:941.95 G:941.96 G:941.65 G:941.55 T/G:941.75 T/G:941.92 T/G:941.92 G:941.81 G:941.56 G:941.62 G:941.70 G:941.24 G:941.17 G:941.29 G:941.36 G:941.93 FULL-HEIGHT TO FLUSH CURB TRANSITION FULL-HEIGHT TO FLUSH CURB TRANSITION T/G:941.92 T/G:941.92 T/G:941.92 T/G:941.92 T/G:941.92 T/G:941.92 T/G:941.92 T/G:941.92 T/G:941.92 941.61 941.61 942.00 942.00942.00 942.00 942.00 942.00PROPOSED RESTAURANT FFE: 942.00 939.57 HP:939.75 HP:939.68 939.68 941.61 941.61 941.61 941.61 941.61 941.61 941.61 941.61 939.03 939.06 RIDGE SWALE SWALE RIDGE RIDGE SWALE SWALE SWALE SWALE ST-101 CBMH 4' SUMP W/ SAFL BAFFLE RE:939.13 IE:934.00 N IE:934.00 W G:941.84 G:942.21 ST-102 CBMH RE:939.12 IE:934.64 S 64 LF - 15" SD @ 1.00% G:941.93 DD D ST-201 CB 4' SUMP W/ SAFL BAFFLE RE:938.72 IE:933.61 E IE:933.61 W 32 LF - 12" SD @ 1.00% ST-202 RE:939.21 IE:933.93 SE IE:933.93 W 37 LF - 12" SD @ 1.00% ST-203 RE:939.70 IE:934.30 E IE:934.30 NW 131 LF - 12" SD @ 1.00% ST-204 RE:941.70 IE:935.61 N IE:935.61 W 9 LF - 12" SD @ 1.00% ST-205 ROOF DRAIN IE:935.70 S Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s p e c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a t i o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . SHEET NUMBER 20 1 8 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 76 7 E U S T I S S T R E E T , S U I T E 1 0 0 , S T . P A U L , M N 5 5 1 1 4 PH O N E : 6 5 1 - 6 4 5 - 4 1 9 7 WW W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ A V R - O r c h a r d P l a c e \ H J D e v e l o p m e n t - 2 n d A d d i t i o n L o t s 3 a n d 4 \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ T R H \ C 5 - G R A D I N G P L A N . d w g A p r i l 2 0 , 2 0 2 1 - 2 : 0 3 p m © BY RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E PR E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N DA T E : I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S P L A N , SP E C I F I C A T I O N O R R E P O R T W A S P R E P A R E D B Y ME O R U N D E R M Y D I R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N A N D TH A T I A M A D U L Y L I C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L EN G I N E E R U N D E R T H E L A W S O F T H E S T A T E O F MI N N E S O T A . MN LI C . N O . WI L L I A M D . M A T Z E K , P . E . 04 / 2 1 / 2 0 2 1 45 7 9 0 DA T E CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T 16 0 9 7 5 0 0 1 04 / 2 1 / 2 0 2 1 AS S H O W N AC L AC L WD M NORTH GRADING PLAN NOTES 1.ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF APPLE VALLEY, SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 2.CONTRACTOR TO CALL GOPHER STATE CALL ONE @ 1-800-252-1166 AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. 3.STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP PER ASTM C-76 HDPE: 0" - 10" PER AASHTO M-252 HDPE: 12" OR GREATER PER ASTM F-2306 PVC SCH. 40 PER ASTM D-1785 STORM SEWER FITTINGS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP PER ASTM C-76, JOINTS PER ASTM C-361, C-990, AND C-443 HDPE PER ASTM 3212 PVC PER ASTM D-3034, JOINTS PER ASTM D-3212 4.CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OR EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS. 5.SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TO HELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES. WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF EXISTING PAVEMENT. 6.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL. 7.CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM SEWER ALIGNMENTS. 8.GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TO SUBGRADE ELEVATION AND LEAVE STREET READY FOR SUBBASE. 9.ALL EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ANY ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 10.REFER TO THE UTILITY PLAN FOR SANITARY SEWER MAIN, WATER MAIN SERVICE LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS AND CASTING / STRUCTURE NOTATION. 11.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS AND CURB AND GUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE. 12.INSTALL A MINIMUM OF 4" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE UNDER CURB AND GUTTER AND CONCRETE SIDEWALKS. 13.UPON COMPLETION OF EXCAVATION AND FILLING, CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL STREETS AND DISTURBED AREAS ON SITE. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RE-VEGETATED WITH A MINIMUM OF 4" OF TOPSOIL. 14.ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS/CONTOURS ARE TO GUTTER / FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 15.GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSING DRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL. IN NO CASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2% . IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINAL SIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS OR AISLES EXCEED 2% (1.5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL BUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TO PAVING. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A.D.A COMPLIANCE ISSUES. 16.MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 0.5% GUTTER SLOPE TOWARDS LOW POINTS. 17.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 3" INSULATION BY 5' WIDE CENTERED ON STORM PIPE IF LESS THAN 4' OF COVER IN PAVEMENT AREAS AND LESS THAN 3' OF COVER IN LANDSCAPE AREAS. 18.ROOF DRAIN INVERT CONNECTIONS AT THE BUILDING SHALL BE AT ELEVATION <XXX.XX> OR LOWER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. REFERENCE MEP PLANS FOR ROOF DRAIN CONNECTION. 19.ALL STORM SEWER CONNECTIONS SHALL BE GASKETED AND WATER TIGHT INCLUDING MANHOLE CONNECTIONS. 20.ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AIR TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT PLUMBING CODE. 21.MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 1.25% SLOPE IN BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AREAS, 0.5% SLOPE IN CONCRETE PAVEMENT AREAS. 22.CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT "INFALL CURB" WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS TOWARD GUTTER, AND "OUTFALL" CURB WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS AWAY FROM GUTTER. PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPERTY LINE EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR925 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION100.00 LEGEND PROPOSED HIGH POINT ELEVATION HP:0.0 PROPOSED GUTTER ELEVATION PROPOSED TOP OF CURB ELEVATION PROPOSED FLUSH PAVEMENT ELEVATION G:0.00 T:0.00 T/G:0.0 0.0%PROPOSED DRAINAGE DIRECTION ME:0.0 MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (SOLID CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (ROUND INLET CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET CASTING) D PR E P A R E D F O R GR A D I N G P L A N C200 OR C H A R D P L A C E 2 N D AD D I T I O N L O T 1 HJ D E V E L O P M E N T , LL P AP P L E V A L L E Y MN D ST O P STOP D CO CO GT-105B GREASE TRAP (BY OTHERS) RE:941.80 GT-105A GREASE TRAP (BY OTHERS) RE:941.42 SSWR-106 BLDG SERVICE IE:935.00 W SSWR-104 CLEANOUT RE:941.28 IE:934.06 E IE:934.06 SW SSWR-101 DROP STRUCTURE RE:938.99 IE:930.89 E IE:923.66 W SSWR-100 CONNECT TO EXISTING STUB IE:922.95 E 25 LF - 4" PVC @ 2.00% 5 LF - 6" PVC @ 2.00% 9 LF - 6" PVC @ 2.00% 128 LF - 6" PVC @ 2.00% 35 LF - 6" PVC @ 2.00% COMM. SERVICES GAS SERVICE ELECTRIC SERVICE 6" WATER SERVICE TRANSFORMER PAD CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN WITH 12X6 TEE 6" GATE VALVE CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE DIRECTLY WITH FRANCHISE UTILITIES FOR SERVICE CONNECTION PROPOSED RESTAURANT FFE: 942.00 CO DD D CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE DIRECTLY WITH FRANCHISE UTILITIES FOR SERVICE CONNECTION 1" IRRIGATION STUB SSWR-102 CLEANOUT RE:940.79 IE:933.44 NE IE:933.44 W SSWR-108 BLDG SERVICE IE:935.00 W 39 LF - 4" PVC @ 3.31% SSWR-107 RE:935.07 IE:933.72 E IE:933.72 NW 16 LF - 4" PVC @ 3.31% SSWR-103 WYE IE:933.88 NE IE:933.18 SE IE:933.88 SW 22 LF - 6" PVC @ 2.00% Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s p e c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a t i o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . SHEET NUMBER 20 1 8 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 76 7 E U S T I S S T R E E T , S U I T E 1 0 0 , S T . P A U L , M N 5 5 1 1 4 PH O N E : 6 5 1 - 6 4 5 - 4 1 9 7 WW W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ A V R - O r c h a r d P l a c e \ H J D e v e l o p m e n t - 2 n d A d d i t i o n L o t s 3 a n d 4 \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ T R H \ C 6 - U T I L I T Y P L A N . d w g A p r i l 2 0 , 2 0 2 1 - 2 : 0 3 p m BY RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E PR E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N DA T E : I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S P L A N , SP E C I F I C A T I O N O R R E P O R T W A S P R E P A R E D B Y ME O R U N D E R M Y D I R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N A N D TH A T I A M A D U L Y L I C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L EN G I N E E R U N D E R T H E L A W S O F T H E S T A T E O F MI N N E S O T A . MN LI C . N O . WI L L I A M D . M A T Z E K , P . E . 04 / 2 1 / 2 0 2 1 45 7 9 0 DA T E CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T 16 0 9 7 5 0 0 1 04 / 2 1 / 2 0 2 1 AS S H O W N AC L AC L WD M UTILITY PLAN NOTES 1.ALL FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE IN PLACE, AND COMPACTED BEFORE INSTALLATION OF PROPOSED UTILITIES. 2.SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: 8" PVC SDR35 PER ASTM D-3034, FOR PIPES LESS THAN 12' DEEP 8" PVC SDR26 PER ASTM D-3034, FOR PIPES MORE THAN 12' DEEP 6" PVC SCHEDULE 40 PER ASTM D-1785 DUCTILE IRON PIPE PER AWWA C150 3.WATER LINES SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: 6" AND LARGER, PVC C-900 PER ASTM D 2241 CLASS 200 UNDER COUNTY ROADS, OTHERWISE CLASS 150 4" AND LARGER DUCTILE IRON PIPE PER AWWA C150 SMALLER THAN 3" PIPING SHALL BE COPPER TUBE TYPE "K" PER ANSI 816.22 OR PVC, 200 P.S.I., PER ASTM D1784 AND D2241. 4.MINIMUM TRENCH WIDTH SHALL BE 2 FEET. 5.ALL WATER JOINTS ARE TO BE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH RESTRAINTS SUCH AS THRUST BLOCKING, WITH STAINLESS STEEL OR COBALT BLUE BOLTS, OR AS INDICATED IN THE CITY SPECIFICATIONS AND PROJECT DOCUMENTS. 6.ALL UTILITIES SHOULD BE KEPT TEN (10') APART (PARALLEL) OR WHEN CROSSING 18" VERTICAL CLEARANCE (OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE TO OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE OR STRUCTURE). 7.CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 7'-5" COVER ON ALL WATERLINES. 8.IN THE EVENT OF A VERTICAL CONFLICT BETWEEN WATER LINES, SANITARY LINES, STORM LINES AND GAS LINES, OR ANY OBSTRUCTION (EXISTING AND PROPOSED), THE SANITARY LINE SHALL BE SCH. 40 OR C900 WITH MECHANICAL JOINTS AT LEAST 10 FEET ON EITHER SIDE OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE CROSSING. THE WATER LINE SHALL HAVE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH APPROPRIATE FASTENERS AS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION. MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI A21.10 OR ANSI 21.11 (AWWA C-151) (CLASS 50). 9.LINES UNDERGROUND SHALL BE INSTALLED, INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE BACKFILLING. 10.TOPS OF MANHOLES SHALL BE RAISED AS NECESSARY TO BE FLUSH WITH PROPOSED PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS, AND TO BE ONE FOOT ABOVE FINISHED GROUND ELEVATIONS, IN GREEN AREAS, WITH WATERTIGHT LIDS. 11.ALL CONCRETE FOR ENCASEMENTS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 28 DAY COMPRESSION STRENGTH AT 3000 P.S.I. 12.EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE VERIFIED IN FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY NEW LINES. 13.REFER TO INTERIOR PLUMBING DRAWINGS FOR TIE-IN OF ALL UTILITIES. 14.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING TO THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE CITY OF APPLE VALLEY AND/OR STATE OF MN WITH REGARDS TO MATERIALS AND INSTALLATION OF THE WATER AND SEWER LINES. 15.THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 16.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICE COMPANIES. 17.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 18.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL PLAN. 19.BACKFLOW DEVICES (DDCV AND PRZ ASSEMBLIES) AND METERS ARE LOCATED IN THE INTERIOR OF THE BUILDING. REF. ARCH / MEP PLANS. 20.ALL ONSITE WATERMAINS AND SANITARY SEWERS SHALL BE PRIVATELY OWNED AND MAINTAINED. 21.ALL WATERMAIN STUBOUTS SHALL BE MECHANICALLY RESTRAINED WITH REACTION BLOCKING. NORTH SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN GATE VALVE HYDRANT TEE REDUCER UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC TELEPHONE GAS MAIN STORM SEWER LEGEND CO SANITARY CLEANOUTCO EXISTING PROPOSED PR E P A R E D F O R UT I L I T Y P L A N C300 OR C H A R D P L A C E 2 N D AD D I T I O N L O T 1 HJ D E V E L O P M E N T , LL P AP P L E V A L L E Y MN LANDSCAPE LEGEND EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE (TYP.) EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE (TYP.) EXISTING SHRUB (TYP.) SPADED EDGE (TYP.) APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF SOD / IRRIGATION, SOD ALL DISTURBED AREAS (TYP.) SEED/ SOD EDGE (TYP.) ROCK MULCH - 5-7" DIAMETER RIVER ROCK (TYP.) A LANDSCAPE KEYNOTES SPADED EDGE (TYP.) SHREDDED CEDAR MULCH (TYP.) ROCK MULCH - 5-7" DIAMETER RIVER ROCK (TYP.) SOD (TYP.) A B C D STOP ST O P ST O P ST O P D ST O P PI L O T K N O B R D . 157TH STREET W. D D D D DA C A B A B A D A A D B B B B B B B B B A B 3 - BLH 9 - GOJ 5 - TAU 5 - TAU 7 - SGJ 6 - SGJ 17 - KFG 10 - GOJ 10 - WLC 6 - KFG 1 - GSL 6 - GOJ 1 - GSL 2 - KFG 6 - GOJ 2 - GSL 5 - KFG 5 - GOJ 4 - KFG 2 - GSL 5 - KFG 5 - GOJ 4 - KFG 22 - PWW 1 - GSL 13 - KFG 2 - GSL 5 - KFG 5 - GOJ 4 - KFG 2 - GSL 5 - KFG 5 - KFG 2 - GSL 5 - GOJ 5 - GOJ 4 - KFG 4 - KFG 10 - KFG 10 - KFG 7 - KFG 7 - KFG 7 - KFG 8 - KFG 18 - KFG 2 - GSL 5 - KFG 5 - GOJ 4 - KFG 5 - GOJ 3 - BLH 3 - WHP 1 - NPO 5 - TAU 4 - BLH 4 - BLH 3 - NPO 2 - WHP 18 - TAU 26 - KFG26 - KFG 23 - KFG7 - GLS 23 - GLS 3 - GLS 6 - GOJ 8 - GLS 3 - GOJ 4 - HMA 2 - GOJ 3 - HMA 2 - GOJ 3 - HMA 2 - GOJ 2 - HMA 2 - GOJ 2 - HMA 2 - GOJ 3 - HMA 2 - GOJ 3 - HMA 10 - BLH 19 - GOJ 45 - KFG 11 - GLS 10 - GLS 29 - KFG 12 - GLS 22 - KFG 1 - NPO 10 - GLS 16 - GLS 8 - GLS 10 - GLS 9 - GLS 2 - PRC 6 - BLH B A 92 - BES CONIFEROUS TREE CODE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME WHP PINUS STROBUS WHITE PINE ORNAMENTAL TREE CODE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME PRC MALUS IOENSIS `PRAIRIE ROSE`PRAIRIE ROSE CRABAPPLE OVERSTORY TREE CODE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME GSL TILIA CORDATA `GREENSPIRE`GREENSPIRE LITTLELEAF LINDEN NPO QUERCUS ELLIPSOIDALIS NORTHERN PIN OAK CONIFEROUS SHRUBS CODE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME GOJ JUNIPERUS VIRGINIANA `GREY OWL`GREY OWL JUNIPER HMA THUJA OCCIDENTALIS `HOLMSTRUP`HOLMSTRUP ARBORVITAE SGJ JUNIPERUS CHINENSIS `SEA GREEN`SEA GREEN JUNIPER TAU TAXUS X MEDIA `TAUNTONII`TAUTON YEW DECIDUOUS SHRUBS CODE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME BLH HYDRANGEA MACROPHYLLA `PIIHM-II` TM BLOOMSTRUCK HYDRANGEA GLS RHUS AROMATICA `GRO-LOW`GRO-LOW FRAGRANT SUMAC PERENNIALS CODE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME BES RUDBECKIA FULGIDA `GOLDSTURM`BLACK-EYED SUSAN KFG CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA `KARL FOERSTER`KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS PWW ECHINACEA X `POW WOW WILDBERRY`POW WOW WILDBERRY CONEFLOWER WLC NEPETA X FAASSENII `WALKERS LOW`WALKERS LOW CATMINT PLANT SCHE'ULE Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s p e c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a t i o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . SHEET NUMBER 20 1 8 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 76 7 E U S T I S S T R E E T , S U I T E 1 0 0 , S T . P A U L , M N 5 5 1 1 4 PH O N E : 6 5 1 - 6 4 5 - 4 1 9 7 WW W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ A V R - O r c h a r d P l a c e \ H J D e v e l o p m e n t - 2 n d A d d i t i o n L o t s 3 a n d 4 \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ T R H \ L 1 - L A N D S C A P E P L A N . d w g A p r i l 2 0 , 2 0 2 1 - 2 : 4 2 p m BY RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E PR E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N PR E P A R E D F O R LA N D S C A P E P L A N L100 OR C H A R D P L A C E 2 N D AD D I T I O N L O T 1 HJ D E V E L O P M E N T , LL P AP P L E V A L L E Y MN DA T E : I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S P L A N , SP E C I F I C A T I O N O R R E P O R T W A S P R E P A R E D B Y ME O R U N D E R M Y D I R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N A N D TH A T I A M A D U L Y L I C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L LA N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U N D E R T H E L A W S O F TH E S T A T E O F M I N N E S O T A . MN LI C . N O . MI T C H E L L G . C O O K A S , P . L . A . 04 / 2 1 / 2 0 2 1 56 5 2 2 DA T E CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T 16 0 9 7 5 0 0 1 04 / 2 1 / 2 0 2 1 AS S H O W N SJ B SJ B MG C LANDSACPE YARD REQUIRED (PILOT KNOB RD.)15' LANDSCAPE YARD PROVIDED:15' MINIMUM LANDSCAPE YARD REQUIRED (157TH ST. W.15' LANDSCAPE YARD PROVIDED 15' MINIMUM LANDSCAPE ISLANDS REQUIRED:2,030 S.F. (2.00%) = 101,495 S.F. * 0.02) LANDSCAPE ISLANDS PROVIDED:5,740 S.F. (5.66%) ISLAND TREE PLANTINGS REQUIRED:14 - 2.5" CAL. TREES = (2,030 S.F. OF ISLAND AREA/150 S.F. ISLAND TREE PLANTINGS PROVIDED:14 - 2.5" CAL. TREES LANDSCAPE SUMMARY NORTH CONIFEROUS TREE CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT CAL SIZE WHP 5 PINUS STROBUS WHITE PINE B & B 8-10` HT. ORNAMENTAL TREE CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT CAL SIZE PRC 2 MALUS IOENSIS `PRAIRIE ROSE`PRAIRIE ROSE CRABAPPLE B & B 3" CAL. OVERSTORY TREE CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT CAL SIZE GSL 15 TILIA CORDATA `GREENSPIRE`GREENSPIRE LITTLELEAF LINDEN B & B 3" CAL. NPO 5 QUERCUS ELLIPSOIDALIS NORTHERN PIN OAK B & B 3" CAL. CONIFEROUS SHRUBS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT SPACING SIZE GOJ 106 JUNIPERUS VIRGINIANA `GREY OWL`GREY OWL JUNIPER #5 CONT.4` O.C. HMA 20 THUJA OCCIDENTALIS `HOLMSTRUP`HOLMSTRUP ARBORVITAE #5 CONT.5` O.C. SGJ 13 JUNIPERUS CHINENSIS `SEA GREEN`SEA GREEN JUNIPER #5 CONT.5` O.C. TAU 33 TAXUS X MEDIA `TAUNTONII`TAUTON YEW #5 CONT.5` O.C. DECIDUOUS SHRUBS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT SPACING SIZE BLH 30 HYDRANGEA MACROPHYLLA `PIIHM-II` TM BLOOMSTRUCK HYDRANGEA #5 CONT.4` O.C. GLS 127 RHUS AROMATICA `GRO-LOW`GRO-LOW FRAGRANT SUMAC #5 CONT.4` O.C. PERENNIALS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT SIZE SPACING BES 92 RUDBECKIA FULGIDA `GOLDSTURM`BLACK-EYED SUSAN #1 CONT 18" OC KFG 330 CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA `KARL FOERSTER`KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS #1 CONT 30" OC PWW 22 ECHINACEA X `POW WOW WILDBERRY`POW WOW WILDBERRY CONEFLOWER #1 CONT 24" OC WLC 10 NEPETA X FAASSENII `WALKERS LOW`WALKERS LOW CATMINT #1 CONT 30" OC PLANT SCHE'ULE Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s p e c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a t i o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . SHEET NUMBER 20 1 8 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 76 7 E U S T I S S T R E E T , S U I T E 1 0 0 , S T . P A U L , M N 5 5 1 1 4 PH O N E : 6 5 1 - 6 4 5 - 4 1 9 7 WW W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ A V R - O r c h a r d P l a c e \ H J D e v e l o p m e n t - 2 n d A d d i t i o n L o t s 3 a n d 4 \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ T R H \ L 1 - L A N D S C A P E D E T A I L S . d w g A p r i l 2 0 , 2 0 2 1 - 2 : 4 2 p m BY RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E PR E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N PR E P A R E D F O R LA N D S C A P E DE T A I L S L101 OR C H A R D P L A C E 2 N D AD D I T I O N L O T 1 HJ D E V E L O P M E N T , LL P AP P L E V A L L E Y MN DA T E : I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S P L A N , SP E C I F I C A T I O N O R R E P O R T W A S P R E P A R E D B Y ME O R U N D E R M Y D I R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N A N D TH A T I A M A D U L Y L I C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L LA N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U N D E R T H E L A W S O F TH E S T A T E O F M I N N E S O T A . MN LI C . N O . MI T C H E L L G . C O O K A S , P . L . A . 04 / 2 1 / 2 0 2 1 56 5 2 2 DA T E CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T 16 0 9 7 5 0 0 1 04 / 2 1 / 2 0 2 1 AS S H O W N KH A KH A MG C DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH NOTES: 2X ROOT BALL WIDTH SOD 4" TOPSOIL PREPARED PLANTING BED AND BACKFILL SOIL (THOROUGHLY LOOSENED) NOTES: 1.SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. 2.PROCEED WITH CORRECTIVE PRUNING OF TOP AND ROOT. 3.REMOVE CONTAINER AND SCORE OUTSIDE OF SOIL MASS TO REDIRECT AND PREVENT CIRCLING FIBROUS ROOTS. REMOVE OR CORRECT STEM GIRDLING ROOTS. 4.PLUMB AND BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL. 5.WATER THOROUGHLY WITHIN 2 HOURS TO SETTLE PLANTS AND FILL VOIDS. 6.BACK FILL VOIDS AND WATER SECOND TIME. 7.PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE SECOND WATERING UNLESS SOIL MOISTURE IS EXCESSIVE. 8.MIX IN 3-4" OF ORGANIC COMPOST. 1.SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. 2.PROCEED WITH CORRECTIVE PRUNING. 3.SET PLANT ON UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL OR THOROUGHLY COMPACTED PLANTING SOIL. INSTALL PLANT SO THE ROOT FLARE IS AT OR UP TO 2" ABOVE THE FINISHED GRADE WITH BURLAP AND WIRE BASKET, (IF USED), INTACT. 4.SLIT REMAINING TREATED BURLAP AT 6" INTERVALS. 5.BACKFILL TO WITHIN APPROXIMATELY 12" OF THE TOP OF THE ROOTBALL, THEN WATER PLANT. REMOVE THE TOP 1/3 OF THE BASKET OR THE TOP TWO HORIZONTAL RINGS WHICHEVER IS GREATER. REMOVE ALL BURLAP AND NAILS FROM THE TOP 1/3 OF THE BALL. REMOVE ALL TWINE. REMOVE OR CORRECT STEM GIRDLING ROOTS. 6.PLUMB AND BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL. 7.WATER THOROUGHLY WITHIN 2 HOURS TO SETTLE PLANTS AND FILL VOIDS. 8.BACK FILL VOIDS AND WATER SECOND TIME. 9.PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE SECOND WATERING UNLESS SOIL MOISTURE IS EXCESSIVE. 10.FINAL LOCATION OF TREE TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER. PLANTING SOIL ON CENTER SPACING AS STATED ON PLAN. EXTEND HOLE EXCAVATION WIDTH A MINIMUM OF 6" BEYOND THE PLANTS ROOT SYSTEM. FINISHED GRADE EDGER, AS SPECIFIED TREE PLANTING DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S.L1011 SHRUB / PERENNIAL PLANTING DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S.L1012 SPADED EDGE DETAIL SCALE: 1-1/2"=1'L1013 MULCH AT PLANTING AREA SPADED EDGE "V" SHAPED, 4" WIDTH, 4" DEPTH, MORE VERTICAL ON LAWN SIDE LAWN GRASS FINISHED GRADE 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT COMMON GROUND ALLIANCE AT 811 OR CALL811.COM TO VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PLANTS OR LANDSCAPE MATERIAL. 2.ACTUAL LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL IS SUBJECT TO FIELD AND SITE CONDITIONS. 3.NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. 4.ALL SUBSTITUTIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF ANY BID AND/OR QUOTE BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. 5.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TWO YEAR GUARANTEE OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS. THE GUARANTEE BEGINS ON THE DATE OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S OR OWNER'S WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE OF THE INITIAL PLANTING. REPLACEMENT PLANT MATERIAL SHALL HAVE A ONE YEAR GUARANTEE COMMENCING UPON PLANTING. 6.ALL PLANTS TO BE SPECIMEN GRADE, MINNESOTA-GROWN AND/OR HARDY. SPECIMEN GRADE SHALL ADHERE TO, BUT IS NOT LIMITED BY, THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS: ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM DISEASE, PESTS, WOUNDS, SCARS, ETC. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM NOTICEABLE GAPS, HOLES, OR DEFORMITIES. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM BROKEN OR DEAD BRANCHES. ALL PLANTS SHALL HAVE HEAVY, HEALTHY BRANCHING AND LEAFING. CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL HAVE AN ESTABLISHED MAIN LEADER AND A HEIGHT TO WIDTH RATIO OF NO LESS THAN 5:3. 7.PLANTS TO MEET AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK (ANSI Z60.1-2014 OR MOST CURRENT VERSION) REQUIREMENTS FOR SIZE AND TYPE SPECIFIED. 8.PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER MNLA & ANSI STANDARD PLANTING PRACTICES. 9.PLANTS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY PLANTED UPON ARRIVAL AT SITE. PROPERLY HEEL-IN MATERIALS IF NECESSARY; TEMPORARY ONLY. 10.PRIOR TO PLANTING, FIELD VERIFY THAT THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR IS LOCATED AT THE TOP OF THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE. IF THIS IS NOT THE CASE, SOIL SHALL BE REMOVED DOWN TO THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR. WHEN THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE IS PLANTED, THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR SHALL BE EVEN OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. 11.OPEN TOP OF BURLAP ON BB MATERIALS; REMOVE POT ON POTTED PLANTS; SPLIT AND BREAK APART PEAT POTS. 12.PRUNE PLANTS AS NECESSARY - PER STANDARD NURSERY PRACTICE AND TO CORRECT POOR BRANCHING OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES. 13.WRAP ALL SMOOTH-BARKED TREES - FASTEN TOP AND BOTTOM. REMOVE BY APRIL 1ST. 14.STAKING OF TREES AS REQUIRED; REPOSITION, PLUMB AND STAKE IF NOT PLUMB AFTER ONE YEAR. 15.THE NEED FOR SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE DETERMINED UPON SITE SOIL CONDITIONS PRIOR TO PLANTING. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR THE NEED OF ANY SOIL AMENDMENTS. 16.BACKFILL SOIL AND TOPSOIL TO ADHERE TO MN/DOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 3877 (SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW) AND TO BE EXISTING TOP SOIL FROM SITE FREE OF ROOTS, ROCKS LARGER THAN ONE INCH, SUBSOIL DEBRIS, AND LARGE WEEDS UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE. MINIMUM 4" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR ALL LAWN GRASS AREAS AND 12" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR TREE, SHRUBS, AND PERENNIALS. 17.MULCH TO BE AT ALL TREE, SHRUB, PERENNIAL, AND MAINTENANCE AREAS. TREE AND SHRUB PLANTING BEDS SHALL HAVE 4" DEPTH OF SHREDDED CEDAR MULCH. SHREDDED CEDAR MULCH TO BE USED AROUND ALL PLANTS WITHIN TURF AREAS AND PARKING LOT ISLANDS. MULCH TO BE FREE OF DELETERIOUS MATERIAL AND NATURAL COLOR, OR APPROVED BY OWNER. ROCK MULCH TO BE WASHED RIVER ROCK, 5-7" DIAMETER, AT MINIMUM 10" DEPTH, OR APPROVED EQUAL. ROCK MULCH TO BE ON COMMERCIAL GRADE FILTER FABRIC, BY TYPAR, OR APPROVED EQUAL WITH NO EXPOSURE. MULCH AND FABRIC TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. MULCH TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE). 18.ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SOD TO BE STANDARD MINNESOTA GROWN AND HARDY BLUEGRASS MIX, FREE OF LAWN WEEDS. ALL TOPSOIL AREAS TO BE RAKED TO REMOVE DEBRIS AND ENSURE DRAINAGE. SLOPES OF 3:1 OR GREATER SHALL BE STAKED. SEED AS SPECIFIED AND PER MN/DOT SPECIFICATIONS. IF NOT INDICATED ON LANDSCAPE PLAN, SEE EROSION CONTROL PLAN. 19.PROVIDE IRRIGATION TO ALL PLANTED AREAS ON SITE. IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE DESIGN/BUILD BY LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE OPERATION MANUALS, AS-BUILT PLANS, AND NORMAL PROGRAMMING. SYSTEM SHALL BE WINTERIZED AND HAVE SPRING STARTUP DURING FIRST YEAR OF OPERATION. SYSTEM SHALL HAVE ONE-YEAR WARRANTY ON ALL PARTS AND LABOR. ALL INFORMATION ABOUT INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. 20.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE NECESSARY WATERING OF PLANT MATERIALS UNTIL THE PLANT IS FULLY ESTABLISHED OR IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS OPERATIONAL. OWNER WILL NOT PROVIDE WATER FOR CONTRACTOR. 21.REPAIR, REPLACE, OR PROVIDE SOD/SEED AS REQUIRED FOR ANY ROADWAY BOULEVARD AREAS ADJACENT TO THE SITE DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION. 22.REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO PROPERTY FROM PLANTING OPERATIONS AT NO COST TO OWNER. 25.MAINTAIN TREES, SHRUBS, AND OTHER PLANTS UNTIL PROJECT COMPLETION, BUT IN NO CASE, LESS THAN FOLLOWING PERIOD; 1 YEAR AFTER PROJECT COMPLETION. MAINTAIN TREES, SHRUBS, AND OTHER PLANTS BY PRUNING, CULTIVATING, AND WEEDING AS REQUIRED FOR HEALTHY GROWTH. RESTORE PLANTING SAUCERS. TIGHTEN AND REPAIR STAKE AND GUY SUPPORTS AND RESET TREES AND SHRUBS TO PROPER GRADES OR VERTICAL POSITION AS REQUIRED. RESTORE OR REPLACE DAMAGED WRAPPINGS. SPRAY AS REQUIRED TO KEEP TREES AND SHRUBS FREE OF INSECTS AND DISEASE. REPLENISH MULCH TO THE REQUIRED DEPTH. MAINTAIN LAWNS FOR 45 DAYS AFTER INSTALLING SOD INCLUDING MOWING WHEN SOD REACHES 4" IN HEIGHT. WEED PLANTING BEDS AND MULCH SAUCERS AT MINIMUM ONCE A MONTH DURING THE GROWING SEASON. PROVIDE A MONTHLY REPORT TO THE OWNER ON WEEDING AND OTHER MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES. . LANDSCAPE NOTES I T E M: 5.B. P L A NNI NG C O MMI S S I O N ME E T I NG D AT E :May 5, 2021 S E C T I O N:L and Use / Action I tems Description: Cider Ridge Marketplace/Hope A lliance 2nd A ddition - P C21-02-Z C B F S taff Contact: K athy Bodmer, A I C P, Planner Department / Division: Community Development Department Applicant: Hempel Companies and Hope Church of C&M Alliance P roject Number: P C21-02-Z C B F Applicant Date: 2/1/2021 60 Days: 4/2/2021 120 Days: 6/1/2021 AC T I O N RE Q UE S T E D: 1. Recommend approval of amendments to draft Planned Development (PD) zoning district to allow drive-thru window service as a conditional use in conjunction with a Class III restaurant consistent with draft PD ordinance. 2. Recommend approval of conditional use permit (C UP) for drive-thru window service in conjunction with a C lass III restaurant, subject to an amendment of the P D zoning, and limited to between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. with conditions as stated in the draft PD ordinance. 3. Recommend approval of the site plan/building permit to construct a 7,420 sq. ft. multi- tenant limited commercial/neighborhood services building subject to the following conditions: 1. Development shall be conducted in accordance with the Site Plan dated April 9, 2021. All civil documents shall be updated prior to review by C ity C ouncil in accordance with the April 9, 2021, Site Plan. 2. At time of application of the building permit, Developer shall provide evidence of cross-access and cross parking agreement between Lots 1 and 2. 3. A nursery bid list shall be submitted at the time of application of the building permit that confirms the value of the landscape materials meet or exceed 2.5% of the value of construction of the building. 4. At time of building permit, Developer shall provide evidence of encroachment agreement with Magellan pipeline for parking lot within its easement. 5. At time of application of building permit, developer shall submit lighting plan that confirms that light levels do not exceed 0.5 footcandles at the property lines abutting the residential areas. 6. Developer shall provide a staging plan that demonstrates how church visitors and staff will be able to safely use the site during construction. S UM M ARY: P rev ious Approv als: T he C ider Ridge development received preliminary approvals August 2020 to subdivide the 7.2-acre Hope C hurch property at 7477 - 145th Street West to create a 36,000 sq. ft. parcel for construction of a 7,100 sq. ft. multiple tenant limited business/neighborhood service building. T he following actions have been approved: Comprehensiv e P lan Amendment from "IN S" (Institutional) to "C " (Commercial) for Lot 2, Hope Alliance 2nd Addition (as preliminary platted). Rezoning from "P" (Institutional) to "P D" (Planned Development) of Lot 2, Hope Alliance 2nd Addition (as preliminary platted). The next step in the process was to bring the PD ordinance with agreed-upon uses, setbacks and development standards back to the C ity C ouncil for adoption. Subdiv ision by P reliminary P lat of Hope Alliance 2nd Addition (Final Plat and Development Agreement still needed). Site P lan Rev iew/Building P ermit Authorization for 7,130 sq. ft. multiple tenant limited business and neighborhood service building. Current Request: T he developer requests reconsideration of the draft P D Ordinance to add coffee drive-thru window service in connection with a C lass III restaurant. Drive-thru in connection with a C lass III restaurant was previously prohibited. When the Planning C ommission and C ity C ouncil reviewed the draft PD ordinance, they discussed the fact that a coffee drive-thru would likely generate high levels of traffic which would negatively impact the residential properties nearby. T he petitioner states that the site may be designed in a way that limits impacts to the neighborhood and would like the C ity to discuss this item again. T he developer submitted a formal request for the C ity to reconsider the coffee drive-thru window and is presenting a revised plan that would accommodate coffee drive-thru. In addition, a conditional use permit is requested for a coffee drive-thru on the site. B AC K G RO UND: Approv ed Draft P D Ordinance: When the C ider Ridge Marketplace project was under review, the Planning C ommission and City Council were very intentional about the uses that would be permitted within the zoning district. T he draft PD district that was reviewed and supported contained a mix of limited business uses including small professional offices and Class III restaurants. Neighborhood service uses were also included in the PD zoning including dry cleaners, bakeries, tailors, and hair salons. T he limited business and neighborhood service uses were intended to be businesses that closed in the evenings and over the weekends. P roposed Rev ised P lan: T he petitioner proposes to revise the approved Cider Ridge site plan by placing coffee drive-thru on the south side of the building. T he previously approved plan placed the bank drive-thru on the north side of the site. T he proposed drive-thru loop was revised to circulate around the building with the pick up window on the south side of the building. T he building is proposed to be slightly larger, increasing from 7,100 sq. ft., to 7,420 sq. ft. but is pushed slightly north and 27' from C edar Avenue. T his setback is consistent with similar redevelopment infill developments along Cedar Avenue. T he drive- thru loop is shown within the City's drainage and utility easement, but only paving and curb, not other structures. During the review process, the developer and City have worked together to structure the PD ordinance and site plan to minimize impacts to the neighborhood: Shopping center hours are limited to 6:30 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Drive-thru service for Class III restaurant limited to 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. T he drive-thru lane wraps behind the building which provides stacking of 13 vehicles and removes circulation conflicts previously identified. Screening is maintained between the residential area to the north and the commercial area by the installation of a 6' tall maintenance-free privacy fence and by keeping the mature pine trees on the north side of the site. B UD G E T I M PAC T: N/A AT TAC HM E NT S : Map Ordinance Plan S et Plan S et Memo Correspondence Correspondence S IT E CED AR AVE GLE ND A DR 145TH S T W GLA ZIER AV E GR ANA DA DR GENESEEAVE G A R R E T T A V E 146TH WAY W 146TH S T W 143 R D S T W UPPER 146TH ST W 144T H C T G L A D I O L A C T U P P E R 1 4 5 T H S T W 146TH S T W 145TH ST W GA RRE TT AVE CED AR AVE 1 4 3 R D S T W CIDE R RI DGEMARKETPLACE µ LOCA T IO N M A P ^ µ CIDER RIDGEMARKETPLACE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP ^ SITE C GLENDA DR CEDAR AVE 145TH ST W GLAZIER AVE GRANADA DR CEDAR AVE C C C C MD INS INS µ CIDER RIDGEMARKETPLACE ZONING MAP ^ SITE PD P P LB RBGB LB GB GB RB LB RB LB GB LB LB R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 M-5C M-4CM-6C M-4C M-8C M-6C PD-290 GLEN D A D R CEDAR AVE GLAZI E R AVE G E N E SEEAVE GARRETT AVE 146TH WAY W 143RD S T W 4 OB L I Q U E A E R I A L V I E W Ap p r o x . S i t e Lo c a t i o n 1 Draft PD Ordinance Recommended for Approval by Planning Commission June 19, 2019 Reviewed by City Council August 27, 2020 for Rezoning Subject to City Council’s Final Adoption of PD Ordinance Subject of Planning Commission Review May 5, 2021 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY ORDINANCE NO. ____ AN ORDINANCE REZONING CERTAIN LAND AND AMENDING CHAPTER 155, APPENDIX F OF THE CITY CODE BY ADDING ARTICLE _____, ESTABLISHING PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DESIGNATION NO. _____, IN THE CITY OF APPLE VALLEY, DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA The City Council of Apple Valley Ordains: Section 1. The City of Apple Valley official zoning map is amended to add Planned Development Designation No. ____ and the following property to be included therein: Zone 1: Lot 2, Block 1 HOPE ALLIANCE 2ND ADDITION Section 2. Apple Valley City Code, Chapter 155, Appendix F, is amended by adding Article ___ to read as follows: ARTICLE ___. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DESIGNATION NO. _____. § A___-1 PURPOSE. The purpose of this designation is to amend the zoning chapter by establishing specific performance standards in compliance with § § 155.260 through 155.271 for property so designated on the official zoning map. This zoning district is located at the periphery of a residential neighborhood and is intended to provide a limited range of office, professional service and neighborhood service uses. § A___-2 PERMITTED USES. (A) Zone 1: Within this zone, no structure or land shall be used, except for one or more of the following uses or uses deemed similar by the City Council: (1) Professional and general offices. (2) Banks, savings and loan, credit unions and other financial institutions. 2 (3) Clinics for human care limited to a maximum of 4,000 square feet each. (4) Class III restaurant not to exceed 2,500 square feet Drive-thru window service in conjunction with a Class III restaurant is permitted as a conditional use. (5) On-sale wine and 3.2% malt liquor in conjunction with a Class III restaurant facility. (6) The following neighborhood service uses as limited to the following uses, unless otherwise specifically approved by the City Council: art and school supplies in connection with an art studio, lab or maker space; bakeries; barbershop and hair salons; custom dressmaking and tailoring; dry cleaning “Drop and Go” (no drive-thru or on-site treatment permitted); florists; interior decorating studio (no on-site retail furniture sales); jewelry and watch repair; locksmith shop; music and musical instrument instruction; photography studio; pottery studio; shoe repair; toys/candy made on site; and electronic device repair and service for computers, cell phones, tablets, gaming consoles, drones and similar devices limited to 2,500 sq. ft. § A___-3 CONDITIONAL USES. (A) Zone 1. No structure or land shall be used for the following uses or uses deemed similar by the City Council, except by conditional use permit: (1) Funeral homes and mortuaries (no on-site crematory). (2) Animal hospital or clinic when contained within a building (no outdoor pet relief area). (3) Drive-thru window service for bank or similar financial institution (limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday, no Sunday hours). No 24-hour drive-up ATMs permitted, subject to the following condition: (a) Only one (1) drive-thru window service shall be permitted at this building. If drive-thru window service is currently in use in conjunction with a Class III restaurant service, a bank teller drive-thru service shall not be permitted. (4) License daycare facility. (5) Health or fitness facility, day spa or yoga studio provided all activities are conducted inside the building. No outdoor cross-training or similar outdoor classes or training allowed on the premises. (6) Drive-thru services in conjunction with a Class III Restaurant, subject to the following conditions: 3 (a) Only one (1) drive-thru window service shall be permitted at this building. If drive-thru window service is currently in use for a bank drive-thru window service, Class III drive-thru service shall not be permitted. (b) Noise, headlights, traffic volume and emissions from idling vehicles resulting from the operation of the window shall not negatively impact surrounding residential and institutional uses and shall be mitigated as required by the City. (c) The drive-thru lane shall not impede or conflict with vehicular, bicycle or pedestrian traffic circulation on the site as determined by the City Traffic Engineer. (d) When a Class III restaurant is located less than 1,000 feet from a residential or institutional use, the City Council may restrict the hours of operation of a drive-thru window from 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. to mitigate any adverse impacts caused by noise, headlights, traffic volume and emissions from idling vehicles. (e) If the installation of the drive-through facilities result in the loss of parking spaces, then the resulting parking spaces available for the entire site shall meet the parking requirements set forth in this Chapter or the petitioner shall demonstrate that the resulting parking on the entire site can satisfactorily serve the current and any future uses in accordance with the zoning code provisions. § A___-4 PERMITTED ACCESSORY USES. (A) Zone 1. Within this zone, the following uses or uses deemed similar by the City Council shall be permitted accessory uses: (1) Off-street parking, refuse storage and loading spaces, as regulated by this chapter. (2) Buildings, trailers, unscreened trash dumpsters, or portable storage units temporarily located on the subject lot only for the purposes of construction on the premises for a period of time not to exceed time necessary for such construction. Trash dumpsters shall be removed from the subject lot when full. (3) Public telephone booths and other essential public service facilities provided all yard requirements are met. (4) Outdoor dining area in conjunction with Class III restaurant, subject to the regulations set forth in this chapter. § A___-5. MINIMUM BUSINESS AREA STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS. (A) The following standards and requirements shall be met. No improvements shall be placed on such lands unless the lands to be so used or improved shall meet the following minimum area and dimensional requirements: (1) TABLE OF MINIMUM AREA REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS. 4 Zone 1 Minimum Lot Dimensions Lot Area (square feet) 10,000 Lot Width (feet) 100 Minimum Building Setbacks Along principal or minor arterial streets (feet) 25 Along all other streets (feet) 20 Minimum Parking Setbacks Along principal or minor arterial streets (feet) 10 Along all other streets (feet) 0 Maximum Building Coverage Coverage of lot (percentage) 21 Maximum Building Height (feet) 25 (2) Lighting; see 155.353 (3) Off-street loading; see § 155.354 (4) Building Design and Screening; see § § 155.346 and 155.348 (5) Landscaping; see § 155.349 (6) Parking; see § § 155.370 through 155.379 § A___-6. SPECIAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (A) In order to ensure a properly integrated design within the planned development, all uses shall comply with the following special performance standards: (1) Hours of operation shall be limited to 6:30 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. (2) No overnight parking of vehicles. (3) No outside storage of merchandise or other materials. Section 3. Summary approved. The City Council hereby determines that the text of the summary marked "Official Summary of Ordinance No. ____, a copy of which is attached hereto, clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance. The City Council further determines that publication of the title and such summary will clearly inform the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance. 5 Section 4. Filing. The City Clerk shall file a copy of this ordinance in her office, which copy shall be available for inspection by any person during regular office hours. Section 5. Publication. The City Clerk shall publish the title of this ordinance and the official summary in the official newspaper of the City with notice that a printed copy of the ordinance is available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk. Section 6. Effective date. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication of its title and official summary. 6 PASSED by the City Council this _____th day of ______, 2021. Clint Hooppaw, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk CITY OF APPLE VALLEY ORDINANCE NO. ____ AN ORDINANCE REZONING CERTAIN LAND AND AMENDING CHAPTER 155 APPENDIX F OF THE CITY CODE BY ADDING ARTICLE ___, ESTABLISHING PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DESIGNATION NO. _____, IN THE CITY OF APPLE VALLEY, DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA The following is the official summary of Ordinance No. ____ approved by the City Council of Apple Valley on _______ ___, 2021 Lot 2, Block 1, HOPE ALLIANCE 2ND ADDITION, is rezoned from “P” (Institutional) to Planned Development Designation No. _______. Chapter 155 of the City Code is amended by adding Article ___ to Appendix F establishing PD- _____ which provides a limited range of office, professional service and neighborhood service uses. The PD allows drive-thru window service in connection with a Class III restaurant as a conditional use. A printed copy of the ordinance is available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk at the Apple Valley Municipal Center, 7100 - 147th Street West, Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124. 1 DE M O L I T I O N P L A N 1" = 2 0 ' 60 20 Kn o w w h a t ' s be l o w . C a l l be f o r e y o u d i g . R DE M O L I T I O N PL A N C- 0 1 0 LE G E N D DE M O L I T I O N N O T E S HE M 1 9 0 0 1 I h e r e b y c e r t i f y t h a t t h i s p l a n w a s p r e p a r e d b y m e , or u n d e r m y d i r e c t s u p e r v i s i o n , a n d t h a t I a m a du l y L i c e n s e d P r o f e s s i o n a l E n g i n e e r u n d e r t h e la w s o f t h e s t a t e o f M I N N E S O T A . St e p h e n M . J o h n s t o n 18 9 1 4 01 / 2 6 / 2 0 2 1 SI T E P L A N RE V I E W 04 / 2 2 / 2 0 1 9 N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N CI D E R R I D G E MA R K E T P L A C E AP P L E V A L L E Y MI N N E S O T A RE G I S T R A T I O N N O . DA T E ID S C E N T E R 80 S O U T H 8 T H S T R E E T , S U I T E 1 8 5 0 MI N N E A P O L I S , M N 5 5 4 0 2 (6 1 2 ) 3 3 5 - 2 6 0 0 D E S I G N Ci v i l E n g i n e e r i n g | L a n d s c a p e A r c h i t e c t u r e | C o n s t r u c t i o n S e r v i c e s p 6 1 2 . 2 6 0 . 7 9 8 0 f 6 1 2 . 2 6 0 . 7 9 9 0 1 SI T E P L A N 1" = 2 0 ' 60 20 Kn o w w h a t ' s be l o w . C a l l be f o r e y o u d i g . R SI T E P L A N C- 1 0 1 SI T E P L A N N O T E S HE M 1 9 0 0 1 I h e r e b y c e r t i f y t h a t t h i s p l a n w a s p r e p a r e d b y m e , or u n d e r m y d i r e c t s u p e r v i s i o n , a n d t h a t I a m a du l y L i c e n s e d P r o f e s s i o n a l E n g i n e e r u n d e r t h e la w s o f t h e s t a t e o f M I N N E S O T A . St e p h e n M . J o h n s t o n 18 9 1 4 01 / 2 6 / 2 0 2 1 SI T E P L A N RE V I E W 04 / 2 2 / 2 0 1 9 N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N CI D E R R I D G E MA R K E T P L A C E AP P L E V A L L E Y MI N N E S O T A RE G I S T R A T I O N N O . DA T E ID S C E N T E R 80 S O U T H 8 T H S T R E E T , S U I T E 1 8 5 0 MI N N E A P O L I S , M N 5 5 4 0 2 (6 1 2 ) 3 3 5 - 2 6 0 0 Ci v i l E n g i n e e r i n g | L a n d s c a p e A r c h i t e c t u r e | C o n s t r u c t i o n S e r v i c e s p 6 1 2 . 2 6 0 . 7 9 8 0 f 6 1 2 . 2 6 0 . 7 9 9 0 LE G E N D PR O J E C T S U M M A R Y 1 GR A D I N G P L A N 1" = 2 0 ' 60 20 Kn o w w h a t ' s be l o w . C a l l be f o r e y o u d i g . R GR A D I N G P L A N C- 2 0 1 HE M 1 9 0 0 1 I h e r e b y c e r t i f y t h a t t h i s p l a n w a s p r e p a r e d b y m e , or u n d e r m y d i r e c t s u p e r v i s i o n , a n d t h a t I a m a du l y L i c e n s e d P r o f e s s i o n a l E n g i n e e r u n d e r t h e la w s o f t h e s t a t e o f M I N N E S O T A . St e p h e n M . J o h n s t o n 18 9 1 4 01 / 2 6 / 2 0 2 1 SI T E P L A N RE V I E W 04 / 2 2 / 2 0 1 9 N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N CI D E R R I D G E MA R K E T P L A C E AP P L E V A L L E Y MI N N E S O T A RE G I S T R A T I O N N O . DA T E ID S C E N T E R 80 S O U T H 8 T H S T R E E T , S U I T E 1 8 5 0 MI N N E A P O L I S , M N 5 5 4 0 2 (6 1 2 ) 3 3 5 - 2 6 0 0 D E S I G N Ci v i l E n g i n e e r i n g | L a n d s c a p e A r c h i t e c t u r e | C o n s t r u c t i o n S e r v i c e s p 6 1 2 . 2 6 0 . 7 9 8 0 f 6 1 2 . 2 6 0 . 7 9 9 0 GR A D I N G N O T E S NP D E S A R E A S U M M A R Y 1 ER O S I O N C O N T R O L P L A N 1" = 2 0 ' 60 20 Kn o w w h a t ' s be l o w . C a l l be f o r e y o u d i g . R ER O S I O N C O N T R O L PL A N C- 2 0 3 HE M 1 9 0 0 1 I h e r e b y c e r t i f y t h a t t h i s p l a n w a s p r e p a r e d b y m e , or u n d e r m y d i r e c t s u p e r v i s i o n , a n d t h a t I a m a du l y L i c e n s e d P r o f e s s i o n a l E n g i n e e r u n d e r t h e la w s o f t h e s t a t e o f M I N N E S O T A . St e p h e n M . J o h n s t o n 18 9 1 4 01 / 2 6 / 2 0 2 1 SI T E P L A N RE V I E W 04 / 2 2 / 2 0 1 9 N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N CI D E R R I D G E MA R K E T P L A C E AP P L E V A L L E Y MI N N E S O T A RE G I S T R A T I O N N O . DA T E ID S C E N T E R 80 S O U T H 8 T H S T R E E T , S U I T E 1 8 5 0 MI N N E A P O L I S , M N 5 5 4 0 2 (6 1 2 ) 3 3 5 - 2 6 0 0 D E S I G N Ci v i l E n g i n e e r i n g | L a n d s c a p e A r c h i t e c t u r e | C o n s t r u c t i o n S e r v i c e s p 6 1 2 . 2 6 0 . 7 9 8 0 f 6 1 2 . 2 6 0 . 7 9 9 0 LE G E N D 1 UT I L I T Y P L A N 1" = 2 0 ' 60 20 Kn o w w h a t ' s be l o w . C a l l be f o r e y o u d i g . R UT I L I T Y P L A N C- 3 0 1 HE M 1 9 0 0 1 I h e r e b y c e r t i f y t h a t t h i s p l a n w a s p r e p a r e d b y m e , or u n d e r m y d i r e c t s u p e r v i s i o n , a n d t h a t I a m a du l y L i c e n s e d P r o f e s s i o n a l E n g i n e e r u n d e r t h e la w s o f t h e s t a t e o f M I N N E S O T A . St e p h e n M . J o h n s t o n 18 9 1 4 01 / 2 6 / 2 0 2 1 SI T E P L A N RE V I E W 04 / 2 2 / 2 0 1 9 N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N CI D E R R I D G E MA R K E T P L A C E AP P L E V A L L E Y MI N N E S O T A RE G I S T R A T I O N N O . DA T E ID S C E N T E R 80 S O U T H 8 T H S T R E E T , S U I T E 1 8 5 0 MI N N E A P O L I S , M N 5 5 4 0 2 (6 1 2 ) 3 3 5 - 2 6 0 0 D E S I G N Ci v i l E n g i n e e r i n g | L a n d s c a p e A r c h i t e c t u r e | C o n s t r u c t i o n S e r v i c e s p 6 1 2 . 2 6 0 . 7 9 8 0 f 6 1 2 . 2 6 0 . 7 9 9 0 UT I L I T Y N O T E S 1 LA N D S C A P E P L A N 1" = 2 0 ' 60 20 Kn o w w h a t ' s be l o w . C a l l be f o r e y o u d i g . R LA N D S C A P E P L A N L- 1 0 1 LA N D S C A P E S U M M A R Y HE M 1 9 0 0 1 01 / 2 6 / 2 0 2 1 SI T E P L A N RE V I E W 04 / 2 2 / 2 0 1 9 N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N CI D E R R I D G E MA R K E T P L A C E AP P L E V A L L E Y MI N N E S O T A RE G I S T R A T I O N N O . DA T E ID S C E N T E R 80 S O U T H 8 T H S T R E E T , S U I T E 1 8 5 0 MI N N E A P O L I S , M N 5 5 4 0 2 (6 1 2 ) 3 3 5 - 2 6 0 0 D E S I G N Ci v i l E n g i n e e r i n g | L a n d s c a p e A r c h i t e c t u r e | C o n s t r u c t i o n S e r v i c e s p 6 1 2 . 2 6 0 . 7 9 8 0 f 6 1 2 . 2 6 0 . 7 9 9 0 I h e r e b y c e r t i f y t h a t t h i s p l a n w a s p r e p a r e d b y m e , or u n d e r m y d i r e c t s u p e r v i s i o n , a n d t h a t I a m a du l y L i c e n s e d L a n d s c a p e A r c h i t e c t u n d e r t h e l a w s of t h e s t a t e o f M I N N E S O T A . Pi l a r s i n e e S a r a i t h o n g 45 0 5 9 LA N D S C A P E N O T E S PL A N T S C H E D U L E LE G E N D TR E E P R E S E R V A T I O N S U M M A R Y $$ $ % $ $ $$ $%& 6) 68,7( 6) 68,7( 0(&+ 327(17,$/)8785(7(1$17:$///2&$7,21 $$ $ % $ $ $$ $%& 578 9(5,)< /2&$7,21 6/23(' 6758&785(72 ,17(51$/522) '5$,16 35(),1,6+(' 0(7$/522)723 6&5((1,1* 35(),1,6+(' 0(7$/29(5$1* 35(),1,6+(' 0(7$/522)723 6&5((1,1* $5 & + , 7 ( & 7 8 5 ( , 1 & &R S \ U L J K W ' - 5 $ U F K L W H F W X U H ,Q F &%$' : D V K L Q J W R Q $ Y H 1 6 X L W H 0L Q Q H D S R O L V 0 L Q Q H V R W D Z Z Z G M U L Q F F R P &/ , ( 1 7 ,V V X H ' D W H 3U R M H F W 'D W H 'U D Z Q E \ &K H F N H G E \ &2 1 7 5 $ & 7 2 5 67 5 8 & 7 8 5 $ / & , 9 , / , K H U H E \ F H U W L I \ W K D W W K L V S O D Q VS H F L I L F D W L R Q R U U H S R U W Z D V S U H S D U H G E \ PH R U X Q G H U P \ G L U H F W V X S H U Y L V L R Q D Q G WK D W , D P D G X O \ / L F H Q V H G $ U F K L W H F W X Q G H U WK H O D Z V R I W K H 6 W D W H R I 0 L Q Q H V R W D 6, * 1 $ 7 8 5 ( 5( * , 6 7 5 $ 7 , 2 1 1 8 0 % ( 5 '$ 7 ( 35 , 1 7 1 $ 0 ( 12 7 ) 2 5 &2 1 6 7 5 8 & 7 , 2 1 12 7 ) 2 5 & 2 1 6 7 5 8 & 7 , 2 1 $ )/ 2 2 5 3 / $ 1 / ( 9 ( / $3 3 / ( 9 $ / / ( < 0 1 &:61 &, ' ( 5 5 , ' * ( 0 $ 5 . ( 7 3 / $ & ( $S S U R Y H U 'H V L J Q H U $)/2253/$1 /(9(/ %522)3/$1 11 3ODQQLQJ5HVXEPLWWDO /(9(/ 726725()5217 723$5$3(7 $%& 35(),1,6+('0(7$/3$1(/ &+$5&2$/ 6721(9(1((5 *5(< &(0(17,7,2863$1(/ &5($0 $/80,1806725()5217 '$5.%521=( 67(33('%$&. 3$5$3(7 6&5((1,1* &+$5&2$/ /(9(/ 726725()5217 723$5$3(7 6,*1$*(%<7(1$17 6,*1$*(%<7(1$17 &(0(17,7,286 3$1(/ &5($0 $/80,1806725()5217 '$5.%521=( 35(),1,6+('0(7$/3$1(/ &+$5&2$/ 6721(9(1((5 *5(< 67(33('%$&. 3$5$3(7 6&5((1,1* &+$5&2$/ 67(33('%$&. 3$5$3(7 6&5((1,1* &+$5&2$/ /(9(/ 726725()5217 723$5$3(7 $%& &(0(17,7,2863$1(/ &5($0 $/80,1806725()5217 '$5.%521=( 35(),1,6+('0(7$/3$1(/ &+$5&2$/ 6721(9(1((5 *5(< '5,9(7+58:,1'2: 67(33('%$&. 3$5$3(7 6&5((1,1* &+$5&2$/ /(9(/ 726725()5217 723$5$3(7 $/80,1806725()5217 '$5.%521=( 35(),1,6+('0(7$/ 3$1(/ &+$5&2$/ 6,*1$*( %<7(1$17 &(0(17,7,286 3$1(/ &5($0 35(),1,6+('0(7$/ 3$1(/ &+$5&2$/ 6721(9(1((5 *5(< &(0(17,7,2863$1(/ &5($0 67(33('%$&. 3$5$3(7 6&5((1,1* &+$5&2$/ &(0(17,7,286 3$1(/ &5($0 67(33('%$&. 3$5$3(7 6&5((1,1* &+$5&2$/ $5 & + , 7 ( & 7 8 5 ( , 1 & &R S \ U L J K W ' - 5 $ U F K L W H F W X U H ,Q F &%$' : D V K L Q J W R Q $ Y H 1 6 X L W H 0L Q Q H D S R O L V 0 L Q Q H V R W D Z Z Z G M U L Q F F R P &/ , ( 1 7 ,V V X H ' D W H 3U R M H F W 'D W H 'U D Z Q E \ &K H F N H G E \ &2 1 7 5 $ & 7 2 5 6 7 5 8 & 7 8 5 $ / & , 9 , / , K H U H E \ F H U W L I \ W K D W W K L V S O D Q VS H F L I L F D W L R Q R U U H S R U W Z D V S U H S D U H G E \ PH R U X Q G H U P \ G L U H F W V X S H U Y L V L R Q D Q G WK D W , D P D G X O \ / L F H Q V H G $ U F K L W H F W X Q G H U WK H O D Z V R I W K H 6 W D W H R I 0 L Q Q H V R W D 6, * 1 $ 7 8 5 ( 5( * , 6 7 5 $ 7 , 2 1 1 8 0 % ( 5 ' $ 7 ( 35 , 1 7 1 $ 0 ( 12 7 ) 2 5 &2 1 6 7 5 8 & 7 , 2 1 12 7 ) 2 5 & 2 1 6 7 5 8 & 7 , 2 1 $ (; 7 ( 5 , 2 5 ( / ( 9 $ 7 , 2 1 6 $3 3 / ( 9 $ / / ( < 0 1 &:61 &, ' ( 5 5 , ' * ( 0 $ 5 . ( 7 3 / $ & ( $S S U R Y H U 'H V L J Q H U %1257+(;7(5,25(/(9$7,21 $($67(;7(5,25(/(9$7,21 $6287+(;7(5,25(/(9$7,21 $:(67(;7(5,25(/(9$7,21 3ODQQLQJ5HVXEPLWWDO $5 & + , 7 ( & 7 8 5 ( , 1 & &R S \ U L J K W ' - 5 $ U F K L W H F W X U H ,Q F &%$' : D V K L Q J W R Q $ Y H 1 6 X L W H 0L Q Q H D S R O L V 0 L Q Q H V R W D Z Z Z G M U L Q F F R P &/ , ( 1 7 ,V V X H ' D W H 3U R M H F W 'D W H 'U D Z Q E \ &K H F N H G E \ &2 1 7 5 $ & 7 2 5 6 7 5 8 & 7 8 5 $ / & , 9 , / , K H U H E \ F H U W L I \ W K D W W K L V S O D Q VS H F L I L F D W L R Q R U U H S R U W Z D V S U H S D U H G E \ PH R U X Q G H U P \ G L U H F W V X S H U Y L V L R Q D Q G WK D W , D P D G X O \ / L F H Q V H G $ U F K L W H F W X Q G H U WK H O D Z V R I W K H 6 W D W H R I 0 L Q Q H V R W D 6, * 1 $ 7 8 5 ( 5( * , 6 7 5 $ 7 , 2 1 1 8 0 % ( 5 ' $ 7 ( 35 , 1 7 1 $ 0 ( 12 7 ) 2 5 &2 1 6 7 5 8 & 7 , 2 1 12 7 ) 2 5 & 2 1 6 7 5 8 & 7 , 2 1 $ 3( 5 6 3 ( & 7 , 9 ( 6 $3 3 / ( 9 $ / / ( < 0 1 &:61 &, ' ( 5 5 , ' * ( 0 $ 5 . ( 7 3 / $ & ( $S S U R Y H U 'H V L J Q H U 3(563(&7,9()5206( 3(563(&7,9()5201: 3(563(&7,9()5206:&251(5 $(5,$/)5206( $(5,$/)5201: 3ODQQLQJ6XEPLWWDO © 2019 DJR Architecture EXTERIOR RENDERING Cider Ridge Marketplace 18-077.01 Apple Valley, Minnesota 01.26.2020 PERSPECTIVE - NORTHWEST VIEW © 2019 DJR Architecture EXTERIOR RENDERING Cider Ridge Marketplace 18-077.01 Apple Valley, Minnesota 01.26.2020 PERSPECTIVE - WEST VIEW © 2019 DJR Architecture EXTERIOR RENDERING Cider Ridge Marketplace 18-077.01 Apple Valley, Minnesota 01.26.2020 PERSPECTIVE - SOUTHEAST VIEW © 2019 DJR Architecture EXTERIOR RENDERING Cider Ridge Marketplace 18-077.01 Apple Valley, Minnesota 01.26.2020 PERSPECTIVE - NORTH VIEW © 2019 DJR Architecture EXTERIOR RENDERING Cider Ridge Marketplace 18-077.01 Apple Valley, Minnesota 01.26.2020 PERSPECTIVE - NORTHEAST VIEW City of MEMO Building Inspections TO: Kathy Bodmer, Planning FROM: George Dorn, Building Official DATE: February 23, 2021 SUBJECT: 7477 145th Street Cider Ridge Marketplace SAC determination is required from Met Council prior to permit issuance from the city. Geotechnical report boring log and Special Inspector Agreement is required prior to permit and soil corrections on site. Submit plans to Minnesota Department of Labor, Plumbing Division for review of proposed plumbing, roof drainage, sanitary and storm design. Trash area is required per MSBC 2015 1303.1500 Subpart 1 requires recycling space in accordance with Table 1-A on plans issued for permit. Separate sign permits are required. Structural drawings will be required for review. The City of Apple Valley has adopted the 2020 MSBC 1306, subpart 3 Special Fire Protection systems. This section would require the building to have an automatic sprinkler system installed based on occupancy type and square footage. The allowable area and building heights will be determined once the code analysis has been completed. A grease interceptor may be required for this project per City Ordinance Chapter 51.08 (B) (d) based on type of occupancies leased. Platting of the property lines must be completed prior to permit issuance. Per MSAC 502.4.4, the access aisles for the accessible areas shall be marked with a designation sign that says “no parking. Review areas under consideration for accessible parking areas. CITY OF MEMO Public Works TO: Kathy Bodmer, Planner FROM: Brandon S. Anderson, City Engineer DATE: February 26, 2021 SUBJECT: Cider Ridge Marketplace Site Plan Review – 145th and Cedar Kathy, The following are preliminary Engineering comments regarding the Cider Ridge Marketplace Site Plan dated 01-26-21. General 1. Drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated on final plat over all public infrastructure. 2. All work and infrastructure within public easements or right of way shall be to City standards. 3. Provide a narrative of how the buildings will be constructed and any impacts. The narrative shall include the following: a. Shoring (if applicable) b. Material Storage. c. Haul routes to and from the site. d. Phasing Permits 4. Provide a copy of the executed Encroachment Agreement with Magellan Pipeline for work occurring within easement area as indicated on plans. 5. A Dakota County Right-of-Way permit will be required for work within the Cedar Avenue right-of-way. 6. A Natural Resource Management Permit (NRMP) will be required prior to any land disturbing activity commences. 7. Underground Storm water Maintenance Agreement will be required for the privately owned storm water treatment facility. Site 8. Final site plan shall be reviewed with the construction plans and approved by City Engineer. 9. See attached Memo from SRF regarding the review of Traffic Impact Study and internal traffic circulation concerns regarding drive thru operation and parking conflicts. 10. Preliminary Plat shall indicate required 5’ and 10’ side lot easements for proposed Lot 2 block 1. 11. No Structures are allowed within drainage and utility easements. Menu Boards are not allowed in easement areas as indicated on the site plan. Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control 12. Provide overall site composite Curve Number (CN) on the plans. 13. Final grading, drainage, and erosion control plan shall be reviewed with the construction plans and approved by City Engineer. 14. All drainage swales and turfed areas shall be at 2% minimum slope. 15. Roof drain connections should be shown on utility plan. No direct discharge with building/roof drainage will be allowed to ROW and should be connected to storm sewer where possible. 16. Show all emergency over flow (EOF) elevations. The finished floor/low opening elevation must be 1’ minimum above the EOF elevation and 3’ minimum above 100-year high water level. 17. Provide soil borings and geotechnical report for the proposed underground storm water facility. 18. Proposed curb opening for the new parking lot to the north should be directed to an infiltration basin or storm sewer. 19. Provide details of construction for proposed underground storage basin. Sanitary Sewer, Water Main and Storm Sewer 20. Final locations and sizes of Sanitary & Storm Sewer and Water main shall be reviewed with the final construction plans and approved by City Engineer. Extension of Sanitary Sewer and Water main that serve more than one lot shall be publicly owned and maintained and be constructed to City Standards. 21. Provide additional drawing showing required hydrant coverage for site along with proposed water main connections. 22. Domestic water and fire service shall be split outside the existing building and the valves shall be located 1.5 times the height of the building away from the building or placed in location readily accessible per City of Apple Valley standard detail plate SER-6. Only one service tap to water main will be allowed. 23. Additional Gate Valve and Hydrant will be required at the end of existing water main along 145th for future connection. Future connection should be extended outside parking lot limits in SE corner of site. Additional valve or curb stop should be provided in accordance with City standards at existing service to proposed Lot 1 Block 1. Sanitary sewer should be extended past driveway at this time to prevent driveway closure at future date to make connection. 24. Additional detail is required for storm sewer penetration of proposed private retaining wall. Landcape and Natural Resources 25. No major tree plantings shall be located over any underground utilities. Clusters of trees shall be used near or around these areas instead of planting in a row. 26. Plans should indicate replacement of trees removed in Cedar Avenue ROW. Memorandum www.srfconsulting.com 3701 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 100 | Minneapolis, MN 55416-3791 | 763.475.0010 Equal Employment Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer SRF No. 02114247 To: Brandon Anderson, PE, City Engineer City of Apple Valley From: Tom Sachi, PE, Associate Brent Clark, PE, Senior Engineer Date: February 11, 2021 Subject: Cider Ridge Development Traffic Study; Apple Valley, MN Introduction SRF has completed a traffic study for the proposed Cider Ridge development located in the northeast quadrant of the Cedar Avenue/145th Street intersection in the City of Apple Valley (see Figure 1: Project Location). As part of the Jardin Center/Cider Ridge Traffic Study, completed by SRF in 2019, development assumptions for the Cider Ridge development were assumed in the previously completed analysis. Since completion of the Jardin Center/Cider Ridge Traffic Study, development assumptions of the Cider Ridge development have been refined. Therefore, the main objectives of this study are to review existing operations within the study area, evaluate transportation impacts of the Cider Ridge development, and recommend any necessary improvements to accommodate the development. The following information provides the assumptions, analysis, and recommendations offered for consideration. Existing Conditions Existing conditions were reviewed to establish a baseline to identify any future impacts associated with the proposed development. The evaluation of existing conditions includes turning movement counts, field observations, and an intersection capacity analysis. Data Collection Peak period intersection turning movement counts were collected at the Cedar Avenue/145th Street intersection the week of May 20, 2019 during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. In addition, observations were completed to identify roadway characteristics (i.e. roadway geometry, posted speed limits, and traffic controls) and driver behavior within the study area. Cedar Avenue, a principal arterial, is primarily a six-lane divided roadway immediately adjacent to the proposed development, while 145th Street, a local roadway, is a two-lane undivided roadway with turn lanes. The posted speed limits along Cedar Avenue and 145th Street are 45 miles per hour (mph) and 30 mph, respectively. The Cedar Avenue/145th Street intersection is signalized. Existing geometrics, traffic controls, and volumes are shown in Figure 2. 02114247 January 2021 Project Location Cider Ridge Development Traffic Study City of Apple Valley, MN Figure 1 NORTHNo r t h H: \ P r o j e c t s \ 1 4 0 0 0 \ 1 4 2 4 7 \ T ra f fS t u d y \ F i g u r e s \ F i g 0 1 _ P r o j e c t L o c a t i o n . c d r Cider Ridge Development 145th Street Ce d a r Av e n u e ROAD23 COUNTY 147th Street Glazier Avenue 02114247 January 2021 Existing Conditions Cider Ridge Development Traffic Study City of Apple Valley, MN Figure 2 NORTHNo r t h H: \ P r o j e c t s \ 1 4 0 0 0 \ 1 4 2 4 7 \ T ra f fS t u d y \ F i g u r e s \ F i g 0 2 _ E x i s t i n g C o n d i t i o n s . c d r ( 8 1 ) 1 15 (1 3 8 0 ) 1 8 2 8 (8 ) 1 4 Ce d a r Ave n u e 96 ( 2 1 2 ) 10 4 3 ( 2 7 1 8 ) 14 ( 1 5 ) 145th Street (104) 104 (11) 10 (95) 86 24 (31) 11 (13) 0 (3) 145th Street Ce d a r Av e n u e ROAD23 COUNTY Cider Ridge Development Gl a z i e r Av e n u e XX (XX) - A.M. Peak Hour Volume - P.M. Peak Hour Volume - Side-Street Stop Control - Signalized Control LEGEND Cider Ridge Development Traffic Study February 11, 2021 Page 4 Intersection Capacity Analysis An existing intersection capacity analysis was completed for the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours to establish a baseline condition to which future traffic operations can be compared. Study intersections were analyzed using Synchro/SimTraffic (Version 9). Capacity analysis results identify a Level of Service (LOS), which indicates the quality of traffic flow through an intersection. Intersections are given a ranking from LOS A through LOS F. The LOS results are based on average delay per vehicle, which correspond to the delay threshold values shown in Table 1. LOS A indicates the best traffic operation, with vehicles experiencing minimal delays. LOS F indicates an intersection where demand exceeds capacity, or a breakdown of traffic flow. Overall intersection LOS A through LOS D is generally considered acceptable in the Twin Cities Metro Area. Table 1 Level of Service Criteria for Signalized and Unsignalized Intersections LOS Designation Signalized Intersection Average Delay/Vehicle (seconds) Unsignalized Intersection Average Delay/Vehicle (seconds) A ≤ 10 ≤ 10 B > 10 - 20 > 10 - 15 C > 20 - 35 > 15 - 25 D > 35 - 55 > 25 - 35 E > 55 - 80 > 35 - 50 F > 80 > 50 For side-street stop controlled intersections, special emphasis is given to providing an estimate for the level of service of the side-street approach. Traffic operations at an unsignalized intersection with side-street stop control can be described in two ways. First, consideration is given to the overall intersection level of service. This accounts for the total number of vehicles entering the intersection and the capability of the intersection to support these volumes. Second, it is important to consider the delay on the minor approach. Since the mainline does not have to stop, the majority of delay is attributed to the side-street approaches. It is typical of intersections with higher mainline traffic volumes to experience high levels of delay (i.e. poor levels of service) on the side-street approaches, but an acceptable overall intersection level of service during peak hour conditions. Results of the existing intersection capacity analysis shown in Table 2 indicate that the study intersections currently operate at an acceptable overall LOS B during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours with the existing geometric layout and traffic controls. No significant delay or queuing issues were identified. Note the existing westbound right-turn 95th percentile queue is approximately 30 feet with average westbound delays of 20 seconds. Table 2 Existing Intersection Capacity Analysis Intersection A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour LOS (Delay) LOS (Delay) Cedar Avenue and 145th Street B (13 sec.) B (16 sec.) Cider Ridge Development Traffic Study February 11, 2021 Page 5 Year 2022 Build Conditions To determine any impacts associated with the proposed development, year 2022 build conditions were reviewed. The year 2022 build conditions account for historical general area background growth, as well as the proposed and adjacent developments. Background Traffic Growth To account for general background growth in the area, an annual growth rate of one (1) percent was applied to the existing peak hour traffic volumes to develop year 20 22 background traffic forecasts. This growth rate is generally consistent with historical trends within the study area and future growth projections for Dakota County. Proposed and Adjacent Developments The proposed Cider Ridge development, shown in Figure 3, consists of a 2,060 square foot coffee shop with a drive through and a 5,040 square foot retail space. In addition, the Jardin Spanish Immersion daycare facility, which is 12,000 square feet and expected to accommodate 138 students, has been completed and opened since the initial traffic data collection was completed. Therefore, trips were also generated for the daycare facility. Trip Generation To account for traffic impacts associated with the proposed and adjacent development, a trip generation estimate for the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours, as well as on a weekday daily basis were developed. This trip generation estimate was developed using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, Tenth Edition. Results of the trip generation estimate, shown in Table 3, indicate the proposed Cider Ridge development is expected to generate approximately 174 a.m. peak hour, 102 weekday p.m. peak hour, and 1,760 daily trips to/from the site. Table 3 Trip Generation Estimate Land Use Type (ITE Code) Size Weekday A.M. Peak Hour Trips Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Trips Weekday Daily Trips In Out In Out Proposed Cider Ridge Development Shopping Center (820) 5,040 SF 3 2 10 10 198 Coffee Shop with Drive Through (937) 2,060 SF 86 83 41 41 1,562 Total Proposed Development Site Trips 89 85 51 51 1,760 Pass-By Trip Reductions (89% Coffee, 34% Retail) (-76) (-76) (-40) (-40) (-1,457) Total Proposed Development New Network Trips 13 9 11 11 303 Jardin Center Development Day Care Center (565) 138 Students 57 51 51 58 564 Total New Network Trips 70 60 62 69 867 02114247 January 2021 Proposed Cider Ridge Development Site Plan Figure 3 H: \ P r o j e c t s \ 1 4 0 0 0 \ 1 4 2 4 7 \ T ra f fS t u d y \ F i g u r e s \ F i g 0 3 _ P r o p o s e d D e v e l o p m e n t S i t e P l a n . c d r Cider Ridge Development Traffic Study City of Apple Valley, MN Cider Ridge Development Traffic Study February 11, 2021 Page 7 When accounting for motorists already traveling along Cedar Avenue or 145th Street that will now divert their trip to the proposed Cider Ridge development (i.e. pass-by trips), the net new system impact to the adjacent roadways is expected to be approximately 22 weekday a.m. peak hour, 22 weekday p.m. peak hour, and 303 weekday daily trips. Note that this estimate does not include any multi-use or modal reductions to account for patrons that live or work within walking distance to provide a conservative assessment. The trip generation estimate for the Jardin Center daycare is consistent with the previous study and is expected to generate approximately 108 a.m. peak hour, 109 weekday p.m. peak hour, and 564 daily trips to/from the site. Trips generated by the Cider Ridge and Jardin Center developments were distributed to the study area based on the directional distribution shown in Figure 4, which was developed based on existing travel patterns. The year 2022 build condition traffic forecasts are shown in Figure 5. Intersection Capacity Analysis To determine if the existing roadway network can accommodate year 2022 build conditions, a detailed intersection capacity analysis was completed. Results of the year 2022 build condition intersection capacity analysis shown in Table 4 indicate that all study intersections and proposed access locations are expected to operate at an acceptable overall LOS C or better during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Table 4 Year 2022 Build Intersection Capacity Analysis Intersection A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour LOS (Delay) LOS (Delay) Cedar Avenue / 145th Street B (18 sec.) C (20 sec.) 145th Street / Cider Ridge Access (1) A/A (9 sec.) A/A (9 sec.) (1) Indicates an unsignalized intersection, where the overall LOS is shown followed by the worst side-street approach LOS. The delay shown represents the worst side-street approach delay. During both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours, 95th percentile westbound right-turn queues at the Cedar Avenue and 145th Avenue intersection are expected to increase by 30 feet (i.e. approximately one (1) to two (2) vehicles) to a total of 60 feet, but are still expected to be accommodated within the existing turn lane storage and are not expected to impact operations along 145th Street. The average westbound delays at the Cedar Avenue and 145th Street intersection are expected to increase by approximately nine (9) seconds during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. 95th percentile internal queues for vehicles exiting the proposed development is expected to be approximately two (2) vehicles during the peak periods and are not expected to impact internal site circulation. Note that the 95th percentile queues along 145th Street for vehicles entering the proposed development are expected to be between 30 and 40 feet, or one (1) to two (2) vehicles. This is not expected to significantly impact operations along 145th Street. No mitigation is necessary to accommodate the proposed developments from a roadway capacity perspective. 02114247 January 2021 Directional Distribution Cider Ridge Development Traffic Study City of Apple Valley, MN Figure 4 10% 30 % 40 % 20% Jardin Center Development NORTHNo r t h H: \ P r o j e c t s \ 1 4 0 0 0 \ 1 4 2 4 7 \ T ra f fS t u d y \ F i g u r e s \ F i g 0 1 _ P r o j e c t L o c a t i o n . c d r 145th Street Ce d a r Av e n u e ROAD23 COUNTY 147th Street Glazier Avenue 02114247 January 2021 2022 Build Conditions Cider Ridge Development Traffic Study City of Apple Valley, MN Figure 5 Jardin Center Development Gl a z i e r Ave n u e 80 ( 5 0 ) 10 ( 5 ) 145th Street (50) 80 (100) 90 10 (5) 85 (100) Ce d a r R i d g e Ac c e s s XX (XX) - A.M. Peak Hour Volume - P.M. Peak Hour Volume - Side-Street Stop Control - Signalized Control LEGEND NORTHNo r t h H: \ P r o j e c t s \ 1 4 0 0 0 \ 1 4 2 4 7 \ T ra f fS t u d y \ F i g u r e s \ F i g 0 5 _ 2 0 2 2 B u i l d C o n d i t i o n s . c d r ( 8 5 ) 1 2 0 (1 3 9 5 ) 1 8 3 5 (4 0 ) 6 0 Ce d a r Ave n u e 10 0 ( 2 2 0 ) 10 2 5 ( 2 7 5 0 ) 75 ( 7 5 ) 145th Street (110) 110 (35) 40 (100) 90 80 (80) 40 (35) 45 (40) 145th Street Ce d a r Av e n u e ROAD23 COUNTY Gl a z i e r Av e n u e Cider Ridge Development Traffic Study February 11, 2021 Page 10 Public Roadway Systems Impact The daily traffic expected to be generated by the proposed development and the adjacent development is expected to be approximately 2,325 daily trips. Of these 2,325 daily trips, it is assumed that approximately 63 percent of them are already traveling along the public roadway system (i.e. pass -by trips). These pass-by trips were assumed to be traveling along Cedar Avenue and 145th Street. Information in Table 5 details how expected daily trips generated by the proposed development are anticipated to be distributed to area roadways. The following items are noted: • There is expected to be a less than one (1) percent increase in traffic along Cedar Avenue north and south of the proposed/adjacent development sites. • There is expected to be an approximately 8 percent increase in traffic along 145th Street/Glazier Avenue west and south of the proposed/adjacent development sites. Table 5: Public Roadway System Impacts Roadway Segment Existing AADT Estimated AADT Increase Proposed Future AADT Percent Change in AADT Cedar Avenue N of 145th Street 49,000 930 (-585 pass-by) 49,345 0.7% Cedar Avenue S of 145th Street 48,000 700 (-440 pass-by) 48,260 0.5% 145th Street W of Cedar Avenue 3,150 465 (-290 pass-by) 3,325 5.3% Glazier Avenue S of 145th Street 1,000 230 (-145 pass by) 1,085 7.8% Site and Access Review A review of the proposed site plan was completed to identify any issues and recommend potential improvements with regard to sight distance, traffic controls, and circulation. Based on this review, the following issues and mitigation were identified that should be discussed further. A summary of the site plan improvement considerations is illustrated in Figure 6. 1) The internal drive-through configuration may cause driver confusion and queues may result in internal circulation/parking issues. a. Consider relocating the drive-through operations around the building to provide better drive-through vehicle stacking and reduce internal circulation/parking issues and driver confusion. 2) Extend curb and gutter to provide additional space to reduce parking/entrance conflicts. NORTHNo r t h 1) Internal drive-through configuration and queues may cause driver confusion and internal circulation/parking issues. 2) Extend curb and gutter to provide additional space to reduce parking/ entrance conflicts 3) Limit any sight distance impacts from future structures, landscaping, and signing 4) Review turning movements to ensure heavy vehicles have adequate accommodation to maneuver 02114247 January 2021 Site Plan Considerations Figure 6 H: \ P r o j e c t s \ 1 4 0 0 0 \ 1 4 2 4 7 \ T ra f fS t u d y \ F i g u r e s \ F i g 0 7 _ S i t e P l a n C o n s i d e r a t i o n s . c d r Cider Ridge Development Traffic Study City of Apple Valley, MN **Based on the Drive-Through Queue Generation, Counting Cars (2012), the 85th percentile maximum queue is 13 vehicles for coffee shops with drive-through lanes. The site plan shows 12 vehicles, therefore, an additional vehicle was added. ** 1A) Consider relocating the drive-through operations around the building to provide better vehicle staking and reduce potential internal issues Cider Ridge Development Traffic Study February 11, 2021 Page 12 3) Based on field observations, there is adequate sight distance at the proposed 145th Street Access to clearly identify approaching vehicles. Special consideration should be made to limit any sight distance impacts from future structures, landscaping, and signing. 4) Review turning movements to ensure heavy vehicles have adequate accommodations to maneuver. Conclusions and Recommendations The following study conclusions and recommendations are offered for consideration: 1) Study intersections currently operate at an acceptable overall LOS B during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. 2) The proposed Cider Ridge development is expected to generate approximately 174 a.m. peak hour, 102 p.m. peak hour, and 1,760 daily trips to/from the site. a. When accounting for motorists already traveling along Cedar Avenue or 145th Street that will now divert their trip to the adjacent development (i.e. pass -by trips), the net new impact to adjacent roadways is expected to be approximately 22 a.m. peak hour, 22 p.m. peak hour, and 303 daily trips. 3) The adjacent Jardin Center development trip generation is consistent with the previous study and is expected to generate approximately 108 a.m. peak hour, 109 p.m. peak hour, and 564 daily trips to/from the site. 4) All study intersections and proposed access locations are expected to operate at an acce ptable overall LOS C or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours under year 2022 build conditions. a. Westbound right-turning queues at the Cedar Avenue and 145th Street intersection are still expected to be accommodated within the existing turn-lane storage. 5) A review of the proposed site plan was completed to identify any issues and recommend potential improvements regarding access, circulation, and parking. The following improvements offered for consideration are found in the site plan review section. Neighbor Letters Since March 3, 2021 From: Community Development <commdev > Sent: Thursday, March 4, 2021 1:33 PM To: Kathy Bodmer < > Subject: FW: Cider Ridge 33 Meeting 3/3/21 -Objection to Proposal From: Kara Sent: Wednesday, March 3, 2021 6:35 PM To: Community Development Subject: Cider Ridge 33 Meeting 3/3/21 -Objection to Proposal Dear Planning Commission: I am writing to express my family's opposition to the proposal to add a coffee shop drive-thru to the Hope Church property. We are neighbors of Hope Church. My family was concerned with the previous proposal for the addition of the shops and especially the bank to the property. The proposal to add a coffee shop drive-thru is especially concerning. Foremost, it does not seem like a necessary addition given the inherent harm to the neighborhood when there are already several coffee shops in the near vicinity. Indeed, a Starbucks Coffee drive-thru was recently added to a nearby storefront on Cedar Avenue. There is additionally a Caribou Coffee within several blocks. It is important to note that the Starbucks on Cedar regularly has a full drive-thru, and that would be likely the case with this proposed coffee shop as well. Drive-thru restaurants and coffee shops in close proximity to residences should be avoided due to the increased traffic. The consistent traffic during the week, evenings, and weekends would be unpleasant to the residential neighborhood. In addition to the increased traffic, the neighborhood would be permanently changed by the increases in noise, exhaust from cars idling, and garbage. Aesthetics are also an important consideration for cities, so thought should be given to whether a coffee shop “fits” or looks appropriate in the proposed space. I argue that the changes done to the property would undermine the calm and natural aesthetics of the neighborhood. The neighborhood would end-up looking less like a space for families and more like a bustling business center, as the noises and traffic from a coffee shop are not consistent with a neighborhood. In addition to these considerations, the potential for car accidents at this location should be addressed. Many cars routinely perform U-turns on Cedar Avenue at the traffic light near the corner of Hope Church. With increased traffic flow, there is greater likelihood of car accidents with vehicles exiting the church property to head north on to Cedar Avenue that then could collide with cars performing U-turns. As a bus route, it should also be noted that cars could collide with buses driving on the shoulder if the driver is distracted. Distracted drivers are also of concern during morning rush hour, and the substantial traffic back-up in the morning hours on Cedar Avenue could prompt more traffic collisions in the area. Furthermore, increased traffic delays are a likelihood with substantial coffee shop customers during morning hours. There is additional concern for car accidents in the immediate residential neighborhood in proximity to Hope Church. It should be noted that one of the streets in proximity to the church property does not have sidewalks. Increased traffic in the neighborhood therefore heightens danger to pedestrians. For these aforementioned reasons, my family does not support the addition of a drive-thru coffee shop to the Hope Church property and requests that this proposal is not approved. Sincerely, Kara Steinmetz From: Ross Hedlund Sent: Wednesday, March 3, 2021 9:41 AM To: Community Development Subject: Cider Ridge Hi Kathy, I received the letter notice stating that Cider Ridge is requesting capability for a drive-thru coffee shop on site. From our perspective owning the building down the street (Jardin Daycare facility), we think it’d be a good addition to the area. Some reasoning behind support: - Good spot for parents to stop before/after dropoff; - Nice to have additional food option in area for staff; - Proximity to bus-stop would be good addition for area to give commuters a place to go if they wanted something quick while waiting for bus; - Drive-thru in general would be good as we’ve seen during pandemic to enable survival of the concept. Based on other retail centers we deal with, we’re seeing that without a drive- thru, solid-credit tenants are simply not going to consider a site; - Drive-thru would be beneficial for parents with kids in car seats (it is nearly impossible to stop for anything and go in if you have 1-3 kids in car seats in back and as we’ve seen this year too many parents take the risk of leaving kids in car while it’s running to run in quick only to have their cars stolen with their kids in it); - Drive-thrus are very beneficial for people with mobility issues; and - Additional people/traffic to area a positive for people seeing the daycare site as well. Please feel free to reach out to me with any questions. Thanks Kathy! -Ross Hedlund Ross M. Hedlund, CCIM, RPA Senior Vice President 7101 West 78th Street Minneapolis, MN 55439 O: 952.XXX.XXXX M: XXX.XXX.XXXX Find Us…Follow Us Joshua Benjamin, Hope Church From: Joshua Benjamin Sent: Friday, March 12, 2021 8:37 AM To: Community Development Cc: Tim Bubna ; Benjamin Krsnak Subject: Cider Ridge & How It Will Benefit The Neighborhood on 145th Good morning Commissioners Melander, Burke, Schindler, Diekmann, Kurtz, Scanlan, Mahowald, Director Nordquist, and City Planner Bodmer, Thank you again for your time last Wednesday during the public hearing to discuss the Cider Ridge project. We appreciate your careful attention to this project and how it may impact our community. On behalf of Hope Church, I invite you to contact me to discuss the proposal and how it will benefit our community before next Wednesday's meeting on March 17. I would be happy to set up a Zoom call or meet you in person at the church or, perhaps appropriately, a coffee shop. As you consider whether the Cider Ridge project and its drive-thru design are a good fit for our neighborhood in Apple Valley I also encourage you to consider the following: Similar Drive-Thrus Nearby Although I am not aware of locations in Apple Valley that currently utilize the drive-thru design proposed for Cider Ridge, there are a couple that come to mind located nearby which utilize a somewhat similar design: • HyVee in Lakeville - This design is almost identical to Cider Ridge. Like Cider Ridge - the entrance and exit are essentially in the same spot. I have utilized this drive-thru dozens of times without ever seeing any confusion by drivers on how to navigate, even though it can be a very busy drive-thru. • Dunn Bros on Diffley in Eagan - While more of an L-shape and not exactly the same as the Cider Ridge proposal, if you were coming to the drive-thru via the parking lot (which is how most west-bound traffic on Diffley would attempt to) you would be forced to pass right by the exit before going around a small island to the drive-thru entrance. Like Cider Ridge, this drive-thru does not wrap around the building. I have visited this location many times and never found there to be any traffic back-ups or confusion. If you look at the Google Reviews for this location you will see a 4.6/5 rating over 256 reviews, with no negative comments about the traffic in the drive thru. Here's A Video of Sunday Morning Traffic Worth A Thousand Words In early January we took some drone footage for some updates to our website and social media that we continue to work on. I have included the Google Drive link to this video below. The video was taken at about 9:30am CST on a Sunday morning, approximately 30 minutes before our Worship Service begins and gives a great view of the Cedar Ave traffic...or lack thereof. While anecdotal, I can confirm as someone who is always at Hope on Sunday mornings that the traffic patterns seen in the video are typical of the average Sunday morning traffic on Cedar Ave. Sunday Morning Traffic on Cedar from Hope Church's Perspective After viewing the video, I think you will agree that concerns about over-congestion on a Sunday morning are probably not warranted. Working Within The Confines of the Pipeline & Making the Best of This Corner One question that was brought up repeatedly at last week's public hearing was: "why doesn't Hempel simply move the building east a bit and wrap the drive-thru around?" With respect to the questioners, I do not believe this idea gives Hempel their due credit for the due diligence they have done on this site. The pipeline easement presents significant challenges and I think Hempel should be commended for finding a creative, sustainable solution - in my opinion perhaps the only one that would actually work long term for a business. I would ask a different question: is the surrounding community really better served by leaving this corner as a somewhat poorly maintained patch of grass and crumbling parking lot (which is the current condition) than by having an attractive, well maintained coffee shop? While we appreciate the work of the city staff and the care with which this matter is being treated, our opinion at Hope Church is that the potential traffic and neighborhood "fit" issues discussed at last week's meeting represent a mild difficulty at worst and should not prevent the Planning Commission from approving the project in its current form. Once again - thank you so much for your time, attention, and hard work on behalf of the City of Apple Valley. I would be delighted to discuss this matter with you further if you would like. Have a great day! Best Regards, Joshua Benjamin Hope Church Elder Team (952) XXX-XXXX CC: Pastor Tim Bubna, Hope Church CC: Ben Krsnak, Hempel Companie I T E M: 6.A. P L A NNI NG C O MMI S S I O N ME E T I NG D AT E :May 5, 2021 S E C T I O N:Other Business Description: Review of Upcoming S chedule and Other Updates S taff Contact: B reanna Vincent, Department Assistant Department / Division: Community Development Department AC T I O N RE Q UE S T E D: N/A S UM M ARY: Next P lanning Commission Meetings: Wednesday, May 19, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. Public hearing applications due by 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday, April 21, 2021. Site plan, variance applications due by 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday, May 5, 2021. Wednesday, J une 2, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. Public hearing applications due by 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday, May 5, 2021. Site plan, variance applications due by 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday, May 19, 2021. Next City Council Meetings: T hursday, May 13, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. T hursday, May 27, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. B AC K G RO UND: N/A B UD G E T I M PAC T: N/A