Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021-06-16 Agenda Packet M eeting L ocation: M unicipal Center 7100 147th Street West Apple Valley, M innesota 55124 Planning Commission meetings have resumed at the Municipal C enter and are open to the public with physical distancing restrictions. Attendee procedures and access inf ormation are posted on the C ity's website and include virtual participation opportunities. June 16, 2021 PLA N N IN G C O MMISSIO N T EN TAT IVE A G EN D A 7:00 P M 1.Call to Order A.Planning Commissioners will be attending either in-person or virtually. A roll-call will be taken. 2.Approve Agenda 3.Approve Consent Agenda Items Consent Agenda Items are considered routine and will be enacted with a single motion, without discussion, unless a commissioner or citizen requests to have any item separately considered. It will then be moved to the land use/action items for consideration. A.Approve Minutes of J une 2, 2021, Regular Meeting. B.Authorize Special Planning C ommission Meeting on Wednesday, J une 30th, 2021 at 7:00 p.m. at the Municipal Center 4.Public Hearings A.Eagle Pointe - PC 21-05-SB 1. Public Hearing for a Proposed Subdivision by Preliminary Plat of 22.2 Acres for Residential Development and Site Plan/Building Permit Authorization to Allow for Construction of 27 Villas and 53 Townhome Dwellings Location: 8661 140th Street West (Northwest C orner of 140th Street West and Garden View Drive) Petitioner: J . David Management, LLC and J oel Watrud 5.Land Use / Action Items 6.Other Business A.Andale Mercado Sketch Plan B.U-Haul Addition C.Review of Upcoming Schedule and Other Updates Planning Commission - Wednesday, J une 30, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. Planning Commission - Wednesday, J uly 21, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. C ity Council - T hursday, J uly 8, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. C ity Council - T hursday, J uly 22, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. 7.Adjourn Regular meetings are broadcast, live, on C harter C ommunications C able C hannel 180 and on the C ity's website at www.cityof applevalley.org I T E M: P L A NNI NG C O MMI S S I O N ME E T I NG D AT E:J une 16, 2021 S E C T I O N:Special Notification Description: Planning Commission meetings have resumed at the Municipal Center and are open to the public with physical distancing restrictions. Attendee procedures and access information are posted on the City's website and include virtual participation opportunities. S taff Contact: B reanna Vincent, Department Assistant Department / Division: Community Development Department AC T I O N RE Q UE S T E D: Please let us know you have joined us by either signing at the door or requesting to be an attendee on-line. S UM M ARY: Note: Planning C ommission meetings have resumed at the Municipal C enter and are open to the public with physical distancing restrictions. B AC K G RO UND: N/A B UD G E T I M PAC T: N/A I T E M: 1.A. P L A NNI NG C O MMI S S I O N ME E T I NG D AT E :J une 16, 2021 S E C T I O N:Call to Order Description: P lanning Commissioners will be attending either in-person or virtually. A roll-call will be taken. S taff Contact: B reanna Vincent, Department Assistant Department / Division: Community Development Department AC T I O N RE Q UE S T E D: N/A S UM M ARY: During the C O VID-19 Pandemic, the Council C hambers in the Apple Valley Municipal Building has been set-up to allow for the Planning C ommissioners to attend meetings either in-person (observing social distancing in accordance with Emergency Executive Order 20-81) or virtually (via GoToMeeting). A roll-call will be taken. B AC K G RO UND: N/A B UD G E T I M PAC T: N/A I T E M: 3.A. P L A NNI NG C O MMI S S I O N ME E T I NG D AT E :J une 16, 2021 S E C T I O N:Consent A genda Description: A pprove Minutes of J une 2, 2021, Regular Meeting. S taff Contact: B reanna Vincent, Department Assistant Department / Division: Community Development Department AC T I O N RE Q UE S T E D: Approve minutes of regular meeting of J une 2, 2021. S UM M ARY: T he minutes of the last regular Planning Commission meeting is attached for your review and approval. B AC K G RO UND: State statute requires the creation and preservation of meeting minutes which document the official actions and proceedings of public governing bodies. B UD G E T I M PAC T: N/A AT TAC HM E NT S : Minutes CITY OF APPLE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES June 2, 2021 1. CALL TO ORDER The City of Apple Valley Planning Commission Meeting was called to order by Chair Burke at 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Chair Tim Burke, Jodi Kurtz, David Schindler, Paul Scanlan, Philip Mahowald Member(s) Absent: Keith Deikmann City staff members attending: Community Develo pment Director Bruce Nordquist, City Planner Tom Lovelace, Public Works Director Matt Saam, City Attorney Sharon Hills, and Department Assistant Breanna Vincent. * Present Virtually 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Chair Burke asked if there were any changes to the agenda – None. MOTION: Commissioner Schindler moved, seconded by Commissioner Scanlan, approving the agenda. Roll call vote: Ayes - 5 – Nays - 0. 3. CONSENT ITEMS MOTION: Commissioner Kurtz moved, seconded by Commissioner Scanlan, approving the minutes of the meeting of May 19, 2021. Roll call vote: Ayes – 5 – Nays – 0. 4. PUBLIC HEARING A. Texas Roadhouse Conditional Use Permit Planner Tom Lovelace presented the staff report. Action is not typically taken on the night of the public hearing, though since there have been no comments/concerns from the public, the Commission was recommended to take action. . CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes June 2, 2021 Page 2 of 6 With no further comments, Chair Burke closed the public hearing. As there were no comments from the public, Chair Burke advised that the Commission could make recommendations. MOTION: Commissioner Scanlan moved, seconded by Commissioner Kurtz approving the conditional use permit to allow on-sale liquor in conjunction with a Class I restaurant for Lot 1, Block 1, Orchard Place Second Addition subject to the conditions outlined in the staff report. Roll call vote: Ayes - 5 – Nays - 0. 5. LAND USE None 6. OTHER BUSINESS A. Review of Upcoming Schedule and Other Updates The next Planning Commission meeting is Wednesday, June 2, 2021, 7:00 p.m. The next City Council meeting is Thursday, May 27, 2021, 7:00 p.m. CD Director Nordquist advised that a special Planning Commission meeting would be scheduled for either June 30th or July 7th. B. Eagle Pointe Sketch Plan Review Planner Tom Lovelace presented the staff report. Commissioner Scanlan asked if the streets would be 28’ wide with no parking on either side. Planner Lovelace stated this was correct. Guest parking would be available in different bump-outs located on the plan. Commissioner Scanlan expressed concerns over the guest parking being further away from some units and that people may choose to still park on the streets. Planner Lovelace responded that this could occur though they will be private streets. This is typical of many developments. He stated that allowing street parking would be a challenge due to possible blocking of driveways. Commissioner Scanlan asked where the sidewalk connections were located. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes June 2, 2021 Page 3 of 6 Planner Lovelace stated there were no sidewalks being proposed. Commissioner Scanlan asked if an overlay could be shown at the next meeting regarding the wetlands current location and where the proposed changes are. Planner Lovelace advised that this would be provided at the public hearing. Commissioner Scanlan expressed concerns over stormwater runoff and how that would be handled. Planner Lovelace advised that this would need to be addressed as flooding has been observed in the area and the additional impervious surface would allow for more runoff. Commissioner Scanlan asked about the tree removal and if a minimum caliper size standard could be put in place so that the replacements will not take 20 years to develop. Planner Lovelace advised that staff would take a look at this but that the caveat in moving larger diameter trees are that they are often stressed in transport and do not survive. Commissioner Scanlan asked what the demographic for the development is. Planner Lovelace advised that the applicant would provide that answer. Commissioner Kurtz asked if there were concerns over traffic with having just one exit out of the development. Planner Lovelace advised that a traffic analysis was done and approximately 600 trips will occur at this site. The traffic will increase compared to what was occurring with the former golf course. The streets do have the capacity to handle the proposed traffic generated from this development. A crosswalk is not recommended on 140th Street. Commissioner Mahowald asked if a need for a left turn lane would be recommended since a right turn lane is being proposed. Public Works Director Matt Saam advised that since 140th Street West is a four lane road, if someone wants to take a left there is an alternate lane where traffic can go around. In order to add a left turn only lane, the street would need to be redesigned. Commissioner Mahowald asked how the traffic study compares to the other intersections along 140th Street West. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes June 2, 2021 Page 4 of 6 Planner Lovelace advised that the roadways would be able to accommodate the traffic coming in and out of the development. Public Works Director Saam advised that this information could be followed up on for the next meeting. Commissioner Mahowald asked if the traffic flow has remained steady or if it has been steadily increasing over time. He had concerns over whether a left turn lane would need to be added 5-10 years from now and whether the site would need to take this possibility into consideration to allow space for a left turn lane to be added. Planner Lovelace stated that the traffic study showed that 140th Street West currently has an existing traffic load of 10,900 trips. This development would increase this to 11,140 trips. The roadway capacity is 28,000 trips. Commissioner Mahowald asked if the pipeline would have a veto authority over the proposed plan. Planner Lovelace advised that the applicant could best answer, but the pipeline does allow for some crossover. Commissioner Mahowald asked if the wetland credit would occur on this particular property. Planner Lovelace advised that this would occur off the property. The applicant is requesting to fill in some of the wetlands on the property and receive a wetland credit. Commissioner Scanlan asked if a consideration could be made to allow enough space for a left out lane if it becomes warranted at a later date. Planner Lovelace and Commissioner Scanlan advised that this would be discussed at a later date. Commissioner Scanlan stated concern over the wetland credit given the water issues already occurring on the property. Commissioner Kurtz advised that staff be prepared at the public hearing with traffic concerns. She also asked if it would be possible to have two exits instead of one from the development. Planner Lovelace stated that Garden View does not work for a second exit due to the elevation and 140th Street West would also not work due to site line issues and traffic impacts at the intersections. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes June 2, 2021 Page 5 of 6 Matt Olson with Brandl Anderson Homes was present for questions on behalf of the applicant. Chair Burke mentioned that there were no front porches on the proposed plans for these homes. Mr. Olson stated that the back patios are more of the beauty of the development especially with ponding areas that will be enlarged on the property. Commissioner Scanlan expressed disagreement with the focus on back patios. He also stated that many want to interact with people and the current plan does not allow for that. Commissioner Kurtz asked if the Nokomis model has a front porch. Mr. Olson stated that it does have a front porch area. Commissioner Mahowald commented on what the grading plan will be and expressed curiosity over the rolling topography currently on the site and whether this would be leveled out. Mr. Olson stated that the site will not be completely leveled out. CD Director Nordquist asked that Mr. Olson provide the commission with the location of the Lakeville site. 7. ADJOURNMENT Hearing no further comments from the Planning Staff or Planning Commission, Chair Burke asked for a motion to adjourn. MOTION: Commissioner Schindler moved, seconded by Commissioner Scanlan, to adjourn the meeting at 8:03 p.m. Roll call vote: Ayes – 5 – Nays – 0. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes June 2, 2021 Page 6 of 6 Respectfully submitted, ______________________________________ Breanna Vincent, Planning Department Assistant Approved by the Apple Valley Planning Commission on 6/16/2021 . Tim Burke, Chair I T E M: 3.B. P L A NNI NG C O MMI S S I O N ME E T I NG D AT E :J une 16, 2021 S E C T I O N:Consent A genda Description: A uthorize Special P lanning Commission Meeting on Wednesday, J une 30th, 2021 at 7:00 p.m. at the Municipal Center S taff Contact: B reanna Vincent, Department Assistant Department / Division: Community Development Department AC T I O N RE Q UE S T E D: Authorize Special Planning C ommission meeting on Wednesday, J une 30th, 2021 at 7:00 p.m. at the Municipal C enter. S UM M ARY: T he Planning C ommission meets twice monthly with just one meeting in J uly the third Wednesday of the month, J uly 21. An additional Planning C ommission meeting is requested to advance the review of land use applications. B AC K G RO UND: N/A B UD G E T I M PAC T: N/A I T E M: 4.A. P L A NNI NG C O MMI S S I O N ME E T I NG D AT E :J une 16, 2021 S E C T I O N:P ublic Hearings Description: E agle Pointe - P C21-05-S B S taff Contact: Thomas L ovelace, City Planner Department / Division: Community Development Department Applicant: J . David Management, L L C and J oel Watrud P roject Number: P C21-05-S B Applicant Date: 3/17/2021 60 Days: 5/15/2021 120 Days: 7/14/2021 AC T I O N RE Q UE S T E D: Open the public hearing, receive comments and close the public hearing. It is the policy of the Planning C ommission not to act on a public hearing item the night of the public hearing. S UM M ARY: For your consideration is a request to subdivide 22.2 acres for the purpose of creating 82 lots that will consist of 27 single-family villa lots, 53 townhome lots, one (1) single-family lot, and one (1) lot for common open space for private streets, guest parking, and storm water ponds. T he applicant has also submitted a request for approval of site plan/building permit authorization to allow for construction a 27 villa dwellings, and one 3-unit, ten 4-unit and two 5-unit townhome buildings. T he property is located at 8661 140th Street West and is the site of the former Apple Valley Golf C ourse. Adjacent uses include single-family residential to the north, single-family, two- family and multi-family residential to the west and south, and multi-family to the east. T he site has rolling terrain with the exception of a couple of more prominent elevation changes near the second and ninth greens, and along the northern and eastern edges of the property. T he site directly abuts single-family residential to the north and west, and two community collector streets to the south and east. B AC K G RO UND: Comprehensiv e P lan: T he property is currently designated "LD F" (Low Density Flex) residential, which allows for a range of three (3) to eight (8) units per acre, subject to the following: In areas near single-family and two-family dwellings it would seek to match uses and types on parcels being redeveloped nearby. A land use response would be at the lower end of the cited range. On parcels with sufficient space that also abut higher volume roadways that are forecasted to continue to increase in volume, a density at a higher end of the cited range that could also provide a buffer next to adjacent lower density. It encourages the design integration of natural site conditions such as wetlands and elevation changes that may be unique to the site. Zoning: T he zoning ordinance is used to create zoning districts and identify uses that are allowed in each district. It also identifies area standards and performance standards that regulate such things as the minimum lot area, size and location of a building or structure, building setbacks from property lines, building height, lot coverage, and maximum impervious surface within a particular zoning district. T he property is currently zoned “LD F” (Low Density Flex). T his zoning designation allows for a variety of housing types that would include one-family detached dwellings, two-family dwellings, detached one-unit townhomes, and attached townhomes at a density of 3-8 units per acre. No building can exceed two stories or 35 feet in height, which is consistent with the current single-family, two-family, and "M-1, "M-2", "M-3", and "M-4" multi-family zoning districts. T he distinction of this proposed zoning district from other typical residential zoning districts are: Only one-family and two-family dwellings may be constructed on parcels directly abutting existing one- or two-family dwellings. T he density may be increased in areas not directly abutting existing one- and two-family dwellings as long as the overall density does not exceed eight (8) units per acre. Uses within this zoning district include: Any permitted use in the R, single-family district as regulated therein; Two-family residential dwelling; Single-family detached townhome; and Townhome dwellings, provided they are serviced by public sanitary sewer and water systems and provided no single structure is in excess of 12 dwelling units. Conditional and permitted accessory uses currently allowed in the "R" zoning districts. Area requirements within this district would be consistent with established residential districts in the city. T he proposed plans show a single-family dwelling on a .5-acre lot, 27 villa homes, and 53 attached townhome dwellings. Twenty-three of the villas will be on 46-foot wide lots and four units will be on 56-foot wide lots. T he townhomes will consist of one 3-unit, ten 4-unit and two 5-unit buildings. C orner units will be on 35-foot wide lots and the interior units will be on 32-foot wide lots. When determining lot area and density for a project such as this one, the common open space lot is included in the calculation. T herefore, the unit lot area will be 11,456 sq. ft. with an overall density of just under four (4) units per acre. Liv able Communities I mpact: T he City participates in the Metropolitan C ouncil's Livable Communities program, which identifies housing goals for the community. T he proposed development is consistent with the City's goal of providing a range of different housing styles to provide more life-cycle housing within the community. P reliminary P latting: Approximately 14 acres of the site is unplatted, with remaining property platted as outlots. Right-of-way for 140th Street West and Garden View Avenue occupies about 1.4 acres of the property. T he applicant is proposing to subdivide the property into 82 lots that will consist of 27 single-family villas, 53 townhome lots, and one single-family lot; with the remaining lot (Lot 82) being common open space that will be the location of private streets, guest parking areas, and storm water ponds. T he owners of the villas and townhomes will have common interest ownership of Lot 82 which will be maintained by a homeowners association. T he replatted Outlot B, Cobblestones I, will have street frontage and direct access off Hollins C ourt, an existing public street. Drainage and utility easements will be dedicated around the perimeter of the lot in accordance with the C ity's subdivision requirements. Sanitary sewer and water service to the lot will be provided by existing utility lines located in the Hollins Court right-of-way. T he following items should be included with the subdivision: A blanket drainage and utility easement shall be placed over and across all of the lot designated for common open space. Right-of-way for 140th Street West and Garden View Drive shall be dedicated, which should include enough right-of-way for a right-turn lane on the north side 140th Street West at the private street intersection. An easement or right-of-way shall be dedicated to allow for installation of eight-foot bituminous trail along the north side of 140th Street West. An easement shall be dedicated that restricts vehicular access from Garden View Drive. An easement shall be dedicated that restricts vehicular access from 140th Street West, except at a C ity approved location. Site P lan: T he site plan identifies 27 single-family villa lots, 53 townhome lots, one single- family lot and a lot that will be the location of the private streets, guest parking areas, and storm water ponding areas. Access to the villas and townhomes will be via a private street that will intersect with 140th Street West. T his intersection will be placed directly across from the existing 138th/140th Street intersection. No other access will be allowed to the site. T he proposed private street shall have a minimum street width of 28 feet as measured from the face of the curb. T he street will cross over an existing 80-foot wide Northern Natural Gas C ompany pipeline easement at three locations, which will require approval from the gas company. Also, the private street shall be adequately designed to accommodate a fire truck and other larger vehicles. Prior to any recommendation, the applicant shall provide for review and staff approval of an off-site maneuvering/fire access plan that will show that the private street's turns, curves, and cul-de-sacs will accommodate a fire truck. Twenty-one of the single-family villa lots will be adjacent to the existing single-family homes along the north and west edge of the site. T he remaining three villa lots will be located just north and south of the pipeline easement. T hese lots will have a depth of 66 feet and lot widths of either 46 or 56 feet, depending on the number of garage spaces. T he townhome lots will vary in size, depending on the number of units per building. T he plans shows one 3-unit, ten 4-unit, and two 5-unit buildings. T hirty-three units will be located on the northwest end of the site, between the pipeline easement and 140th Street West. T he remaining 20 units will be located at southwest corner of 140th Street West and Garden View Drive. All lots will meet the minimum setback requirements set forth in the "LD F" zoning ordinance. Dwelling units shall be set back 30 feet from the property line that abuts existing single-family lots, with a ten-foot setback between the villa homes and 15 feet between the townhome buildings. Both 140th Street West and Garden View Drive are classified as collector streets. Buildings adjacent to the the two roadways will be set back a minimum of 40 feet from the street right-of-way line. Buildings will be set back a minimum of 25 feet from the private street, as measured from the top of curb to the building elevation. T he C ity code requires that each single-family dwelling provide two parking spaces in addition to any garage unit and townhome dwellings provide 1.5 parking spaces and one garage space per unit. Each villa and townhome unit will have a minimum of two garage spaces and two spaces on the driveway. Forty-three guest parking spaces will be distributed throughout the site, which exceeds the minimum code requirements. P ipeline E asement: As stated previously, an 80-foot wide Northern Natural Gas pipeline easement is located on the property. T he applicant is proposing to construct a street that will cross over the easement at three locations. It is the pipeline company's philosophy to prevent encroachments, when possible, by working with agencies and developers to design projects outside the pipeline easement. Many of Northern’s easement agreements prohibit encroachments and Northern will enforce applicable provisions in its easement agreements where it believes the continued safe operation and maintenance of the pipeline could be threatened. Where N orthern determines that an activity can be undertaken without jeopardy to the pipeline system, they will require an encroachment agreement or issue an encroachment permit depending on the type and scope of activity proposed. Some examples of activities/work that may occur in the easement include: Street and road crossings Fencing, retaining walls and terracing Landscaping and planting of trees Residential water lines Residential television cable Small diameter drainage or sewer lines Residential electrical lines Fences that do not cross the pipeline Residential sprinkler systems Residential driveway Other activities subject to an encroachment agreement are determined on a case-by-case basis. Finally, their ideal subdivision layout would be to have the entire easement width reserved as an open space trail or green belt. Use of the existing pipeline will be addressed as part of a development proposal. T he applicant should have approval of the development from the pipeline company prior to approval by the City. Wetlands: T here are currently three wetlands, totaling 1.67 acres, on the subject property. A wetland delineation report was submitted on J uly 25, 2018, and was approved by the Apple Valley C ity Council on September 27, 2018. T his report is valid for three years, with an end date of September 27, 2021. T he applicant's wetland consultant determined that the Eagle Pointe project will require 35,955 square feet (0.8254 acres) of permanent impact to isolated wetlands when developed in a manner consistent with the developer's proposal. To offset the impact, the applicant is proposing a wetland replacement, which includes the purchase of 1.6508 acres of Standard Wetland C redit. T he applicant has submitted two wetland applications and is requesting: Extension of the 2018 delineated wetland boundaries. Approval of the Level 1 no wetland determination. Incidental wetland approval for portions of Wetland 1 and Wetland 3; and Wetland Replacement Plan approval. T he C ity C ouncil, as the Local Governmental Unit (LG U), is responsible for administering the Wetland C onservation Act (WC A) and will need to approve the WC A items. T hese applications are currently under review according to the WC A established timeframe. T here will be two items for them to approve via a “N otice of D ecision”, which is the state process under WC A regulation: Notice of Decision for the expiring wetland delineation and for the site boundary. Notice of Decision for the Wetland Incidental Status and for A pproval of a Replacement. Attached with report is a memo from the City's Water Resources Specialist that goes into additional detail on the wetland administration process. Any final approval of the land use application should include conditions regarding approval of the WC A applications. Grading and Storm Water Management: A final grading and drainage plan shall be reviewed and approved by the C ity Engineer. Final locations and sizes of storm sewers shall be reviewed with the final construction plans and approved by C ity Engineer. Grading within Northern Natural Gas easement may require an encroachment agreement between the applicant and Northern Pipeline. T he preliminary grading and drainage plan and storm water calculations have been reviewed by City Engineer and his comments are included in his attached memo. Elev ation Drawings: T he elevations for the villas and townhomes show a exterior finish consisting of a combination of LP Smartside, a type of wood composite siding, and vinyl siding, with 48-inch high stone face on the front elevation of the villas and and a stone face that will vary from 42 inches to nine feet high on the front elevation of the townhomes. Multiple residential buildings adjacent to R zones or occupied M zones shall have a vertical exposed exterior finish consisting of at least 50% non-combustible, non-degradable and maintenance-free construction materials (such as face brick or natural stone but excluding such construction materials as sheet aluminum, iron or concrete block of any kind or similar), with the balance being a non-manufactured natural construction material such as plank cedar or redwood. L a n d s c a p i n g : T he landscape plan indicates a variety of deciduous ornamental and overstory trees and evergreens, T he applicant will need to meet landscape requirements within the C ity’s zoning ordinance, which requires that residential developments in multiple family zoning districts install landscaping (live plant material excluding sod) that will have a minimum cost of 2.5% of the estimated building construction cost based on Means Construction Data. T he applicant will need to submit a landscape plan that labels the plants and a detailed planting list for review and approval by C ity staff prior to issuance of a building permit. T he applicant should also submit a foundation planting plan for city review. For developments having a construction value in excess of $1,000,000, the plan shall be prepared by a landscape architect registered and licensed in the state. T he minimum cost of landscaping materials for the plan shall be equivalent to 2.5% of the estimated building construction cost based on current Means construction data. T he applicant's landscape estimate does not meet the City's criteria and will need to be adjusted. Additional trees should be planted in the rear area of Lots 14-28 and 51-64. Additional landscaping should also be placed around the storm water ponding areas. T here are a total of 267 trees currently on the site. T he applicant is proposing to remove 192 trees which equates to 3,344 caliper inches. T his will require the replacement shall be equal to 10% of the total caliper inches removed. Av ailability of Municipal Utilities: Sanitary sewer and watermain utilities are currently located adjacent to the site. Development will include the extension of sanitary sewer and watermain lines to serve the proposed dwelling units. Also, hydrants and valve locations will be evaluated during final design to ensure adequate fire protection. T he C ity Engineer has reviewed the utility plans and his comments are included in his attached memo. Street Classifications: T he site abuts Garden View Drive on the east, 140th Street West on the west and Hollins Court on the north. Garden View Drive and 140th Street West are major collectors, which are designed to collect traffic from neighborhoods and employment centers and distribute it to the C ity arterial system. Hollins Court is a local street, whose primary use is to serve local transportation needs such as gaining access to the property bordering it. A private street, 28 feet wide, will provide access to the units within the development. Traffic I mpacts: T he proposed development will generate 602 trips per day, which will go to and from the site via a private street intersection on 140th Street West. T he C ity's traffic consultant has reviewed traffic for the development and findings are included in an attached memo. P edestrian Access: A bituminous trail, constructed to C ity standards, shall be installed on the north side of 140th Street West. T he C ity has not generally required sidewalks in developments with private streets or drives unless they are part of a larger planned development, such as C obblestone Lake. However, we are recommending that sidewalk or bituminous trail connections be made from the site to the existing trail on the west side of Garden View Drive and future trail on north side of 140th Street West. T he C ity is requiring that an eight-foot wide bituminous trail be constructed along the north side of Pond #5 for maintenance access to public utilities. T hat trail shall intersect with Streets BB and D D and can provide pedestrian access within the development. B UD G E T I M PAC T: N/A AT TAC HM E NT S : Memo Memo Memo L ocation Map Comp Plan Map Z oning Map Preliminary P lat Plan S et Plan S et L andscaping Plan Elevations CITY OF MEMO Public Works TO: Tom Lovelace, Planner FROM: Samantha Berger, Water Resource Specialist DATE: June 11, 2021 SUBJECT: Eagle Pointe Development – Wetland Administrations 1.Wetland Conservation Act Background: Pursuant to City Ordinance 152.56, Resolution #1994-39, and MN State Statute 8420, the City is the Local Government Unit (LGU) responsible for administering the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA). The Wetland Conservation Act was enacted is 1991. Through this role, the City reviews wetland applications associated with delineations, wetland types, replacement plans, no-loss, and exemptions within the City. Applications are reviewed for completeness by City staff and are shared through a Notice of Application to the Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) according to established WCA timeframes. The TEP provide technical expertise, advice, and make recommendations to the LGU on WCA compliance. The TEP includes the LGU, Board of Water Soil Resources (BWSR) wetland specialist, the Dakota County Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD), the Vermillion River Watershed Joint Powers Organization (VRWJPO), and when applicable, the MN Department of Natural Resources (DNR). After a satisfactory review from the TEP, the LGU issues a WCA Notice of Decision through formal action at the City Council level. 2.Eagle Point Approved Wetland Delineation •A WCA Notice of Decision for the wetland boundaries was issued on September 27th, 2018 at the City Council meeting. The site delineation identified 3 wetlands on the property. Two of the wetlands were characterized as having manmade outlets, meaning they were modified to take on stormwater from the surrounding neighborhood. See Figure 1 and 2. •Summary of Existing Wetlands is Provided Below Wetland Size (acres) Type Wetland 1 0.56 acres 5 Wetland 2 0.61 acres 5 Wetland 3 0.50 acres 5 3.Eagle Point Current Wetland Applications (Under Review by TEP until 6/22/21) •The applicant has submitted 2 WCA Applications for LGU Consideration. The applications are currently being reviewed by the TEP and are subject to change based off comments received by the TEP. A summary of the submitted applications are provided below. •Wetland items must be approved prior to platting the site. A.Delineation Extension Request and No Wetland Determination (No Loss) Summary of Request: •While most WCA decisions are valid for 5 years according to statute, the Notice of Decision issued in September 2018, notes a 3 year timeframe, expiring September 27th, 2021. The applicant is requesting an extension for the decision to keep the delineation valid. •The site boundary was expanded to include the secondary single family home parcel off Hollins Court. The applicants expanding the site boundary of the wetland application to include the added parcel and to concur that no wetlands are present on this parcel (PID #01-18150-00-020). See Figure 1 and 2. Administrative Process: •In accordance with WCA, extension requests and no-loss decisions are an administrative process that do not require formal noticing to the TEP; however, it will be approved through a WCA Notice of Decision at the City Council level within the timeframes outlined by MN §15.99. B.Approval Request of Incidental Wetlands Onsite & a Wetland Replacement Plan Summary of Request: •Incidental Request: The applicant is requesting that portions of the delineated wetlands are considered “Incidental”. Incidental wetlands are stormwater wetlands/ponds that were constructed in natural upland areas and are not regulated by WCA. WCA does regulate stormwater wetlands/ponds that were constructed in natural wetlands or where natural wetlands were utilized for stormwater management. The applicant is requesting that portions of the delineated wetlands be classified as incidental and therefore not considered an “impact”. The applicant is requesting that 0.3221 acres of wetland be considered incidental. See Figures 2 and 3 Wetland Size (acres) Requested Incidental Area (acres) Wetland 1 0.56 acres .1771 acres Wetland 2 0.61 acres - Wetland 3 0.50 acres .1450 acres Total 1.67 acres 0.3221 acres • Replacement Plan Request: The applicant is also requesting approval of a wetland replacement plan for the impacted wetlands. Wetland replacement is a WCA term for replacing the public value of a wetland that is lost due to an impact. Wetland replacement can be accomplished via use of wetland bank credits or project-specific replacement. See Figure 4 1. The applicant has submitted an avoidance and minimization narrative required as part of the wetland impact application. 2. The applicant is proposing 0.8254 acres of permanent wetland impact. Wetland 2 will be incorporated into an expanded stormwater basin and minor impacts are proposed for construction of a pond outlet. 3. The applicant proposes to replace the impacted wetlands through purchase of wetland bank credits at a ratio of 2:1 within the same Bank Service Area as the proposed project, totaling 1.6508 acres of wetland replacement credits. The applicant provided documentation of the availability of wetland credits. Wetland Size (acres) Proposed Permanent Impact Area (acres) Wetland 1 0.56 acres Area A 0.2384 acres Area B 0.1426 acres Wetland 2 0.61 acres 0.0947 acres Wetland 3 0.50 acres Area D 0.2639 acres Area E 0.0858 acres Total 1.67 acres 0.8254 acres 2:1 Replacement Credits: 1.6508 acres Administrative Process (Currently Under Review): • A Notice of Application was issued on June 1, 2021 for a 15-business day review period by the TEP, ending on June 22, 2021. The TEP will review the application and provide any comments to the applicant. The applicant will need to respond to comments before a Notice of Decision is issued by the City. Comments from the TEP may alter the site layout, grading, etc. • As part of this decision process, the TEP will provide a findings and facts associated with the application review that will be included in the Notice of Decision at a future City Council meeting. Exhibits Attached are Figures 1-4 from the May 26, 2021 wetland applications that are currently under review. Note that Figure 4 includes outdated layout plans for the site. The revised layout does not significantly alter the proposed wetland impacts and pond layouts for the site. The wetland applications are under review based on the materials provided in the application and updated plans will be required prior to the Notice of Decision being approved. © OpenStreetMap (and) contributors, CC-BY-SA Figure 1 - Site Location Eagle Pointe (KES 2021-064)Apple Valley, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicatedon this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. ¯0 500 Feet Legen d Project Boundary Source: ESRI Streets Basemap 1000 1 0 1 8 1010 1 0 1 2 1008 1 0 2 6 1014 1016 1 0 3 0 1020 1022 1024 1 0 3 2 1028 998 1 0 3 4 996 1036 1038 1 0 4 0 1042 1044 1 0 0 6 1046 1 0 4 8 1 0 5 0 1 0 0 2 1052 1054 1 0 5 6 1 0 0 4 1058 994 99 2 1 0 6 0 1 0 6 2 1 0 6 4 1066 1 0 6 8 1 0 7 0 1 0 7 2 990 1074 988 1076 1078 986 1006 996 988 998 1000 1008 1 0 1 8 992 1 0 0 4 1014 996 1 0 2 0 998 1006 994 1012 998 1006 1 0 0 8 1 0 1 0 1012 1002 1 0 0 0 10 34 10 0 8 1000 1 0 0 2 9 9 4 1 0 0 4 1000 996 1002 1010 992 1032 996 9 9 0 1064 1054 998 1 0 0 01004 9 9 0 1 0 0 0 1040 1004 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 4 1002 1 0 0 6 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 1000 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 6 1 0 2 8 1 0 0 2 1012 1014 1 0 0 2 998 1022 1 0 0 2 1078 990 1004 1002 1 0 1 0 992 9 9 8 994 9 9 8 1000 990 99 4 1022 1008 992 1024 9 9 8 1008 1 0 0 8 1 0 3 4 9 9 6 1 0 0 4 998 9 9 6 9 9 4 1 0 1 0 1012 998 1006 1004 1 0 0 8 1016 1 0 5 0 9 9 8 1010 1004 1062 Figure 2 - Existing Conditions (2020 Metro Photo) Eagle Pointe (KES 2021-064)Apple Valley, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicatedon this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. ¯0 250 Feet Legend Project Boundary Pipe Wetland Utility Line Dakota County Lidar Source: MNGEO Spatial Commons Wetland 10.56-ac Wetland 30.50-ac Wetland 20.61-ac 1 4 0th St W 138th St W Figure 3 - 1970 Photo with Incidental Wetland Areas Eagle Pointe (KES 2021-064)Apple Valley, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicatedon this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. ¯0 500 Feet Legend Project Boundary 2018 Wetla nd Boundary Incidenta l Wetland 1970.jpg RGB Red: Band_1 Green: Band_2 Blue: Ba nd_3 Source: MNGEO Spatial C ommons 7,715 sfIncidenta l 6,318 sfIncidenta l Figure 4 - Proposed Plan and Wetland Impacts Eagle Pointe (KES 2021-064)Apple Valley, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicatedon this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. ¯0 250 Feet Legend Storm Sewer Project Boundary Wetland Fill Wetland Incidental Wetland Preserved Wetland Source: MNGEO Spatial Commons Wetland 1 Wetland 3 Wetland 2 1 4 0th St W 138th St W A B C D E WL2Pre-TreatmentPond Existing sewerto remain Wetland Impact Area Impact Type Size (sf) We tl and 1 - A Fi ll 10,387Wetland 1 - B Fi ll 6,210Wetland 2 - C Fi ll 4,126Wetland 3 - D Fi ll 11,496Wetland 3 - E Fi ll 3,736 DRAWN BY DATE REVISIONS PL0 22020 CAD FILE 20SS.GZJ PROJECT NO. 20 C2.0 Parcel I: That part of Outlots 2, 3 and 4 of Palomino Hills Lake Shore Addition, lying northeasterly of the northeasterly right of way line of 140th Street West Parcel II: That part of Government Lot 3 and the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 20, Township 115, Range 20, lying northeasterly of the northeasterly right of way line of140th Street West, and lying southerly and southwesterly of Cobblestones I. Parcel III: Outlots A, B, C & D in Cobblestones I, according to the recorded plat thereof now on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Title in and for Dakota County, Minnesota. All parcels in Dakota County, Minnesota Torrens Property PROPERTY DESCRIPTION EA G L E P O I N T E AP P L E V A L L E Y  0 I N N E S O T A PR E L I M I N A R Y P L A T FO R BR A N D L A N D E R S O N 22  R I V E R R I D G E C I R C L E S O 8 T +  S 8 I T E  0 0  B 8 R N S V I L L E  0 N      2   W E S T C . R .  2  S 8 I T E  0 0  B 8 R N S V I L L E  0 N    0  P+ O N E    2 .   0 .  0   P K D P S W R Q # M U K L Q F . F R P PL A N N E R S  E N G I N E E R S  S 8 R V E Y O R S ZZ Z . M U K L Q F . F R P Ja m e s R . H i l l , I n c . A. 202 LD\RXW B. 22 LD\RXW DRAWN BY DATE REVISIONS PL0 12122 CAD FILE 21SS.GZJ PROJECT NO. 21 C2.1 EA G L E P O I N T E AP P L E V A L L E Y  0 I N N E S O T A PR E L I M I N A R Y P L A T FO R BR A N D L A N D E R S O N 22 1 R I V E R R I D G E C I R C L E S O 8 T +  S 8 I T E 1    B 8 R N S V I L L E  0 N      2   W E S T C . R .  2  S 8 I T E 1    B 8 R N S V I L L E  0 N      P+ O N E    2 .    .     P K D P S W R Q # M U K L Q F . F R P PL A N N E R S  E N G I N E E R S  S 8 R V E Y O R S ZZ Z . M U K L Q F . F R P Ja m e s R . H i l l , I n c . A.1221 LD\RXW B. 221 LD\RXW DRAWN BY DATE REVISIONS PL0 222 CAD FILE 2SS.GZJ PROJECT NO. 2 C2.2 EA G L E P O I N T E AP P L E V A L L E Y  0 I N N E S O T A PR E L I M I N A R Y P L A T FO R BR A N D L A N D E R S O N 22  R I V E R R I D G E C I R C L E S O 8 T +  S 8 I T E     B 8 R N S V I L L E  0 N      2   W E S T C . R .  2  S 8 I T E     B 8 R N S V I L L E  0 N      P+ O N E    2 .    .     P K D P S W R Q # M U K L Q F . F R P PL A N N E R S  E N G I N E E R S  S 8 R V E Y O R S ZZ Z . M U K L Q F . F R P Ja m e s R . H i l l , I n c . A.22 LD\RXW B. 22 LD\RXW I T E M: 6.A. P L A NNI NG C O MMI S S I O N ME E T I NG D AT E :J une 16, 2021 S E C T I O N:Other Business Description: A ndale Mercado Sketch Plan S taff Contact: A lex Sharpe, Planning and Economic Dev. S pec. Department / Division: Community Development Department Applicant: E zequiel Quijada P roject Number: P C21-18-B Applicant Date: 60 Days: 120 Days: AC T I O N RE Q UE S T E D: N/A S UM M ARY: Andale Mercado and Restaurant located in Richfield is seeking to open a second location in Apple Valley. T heir current location in Richfield has been a popular destination for several years. T he site they are seeking to locate is at the empty parcel on the northeast corner of Galaxie and 152nd St W. West of Gabella. T he site is 1.48 acre site owned by IMH Properties and currently under contract for purchase by Andale. Andale is seeking a preliminary review by staff and the Planning C ommission through the sketch plan process. Additional review, including a site plan/building permit authorization will be required at a later date. T he site is platted and their current application does not require any conditional use permits, unless they seek to pursue a full liquor license. B AC K G RO UND: Site P lan T he site plan proposes an 18,100 sq. ft. building with a mercado with butcher/deli, restaurant, and a production/warehouse storage area to prepare fresh tortillas and other goods. T he site is relatively flat and is prepared with utility stubs. Site accesses are set along 152nd St. W. and Gabella St. T he total sq. ft. of each use within the building is subject to change as the plans evolve, but are proposed as follows: Market (butcher, deli, production) - 9,235 sq. ft. Kitchen/bar/restaurant - 5,370 sq. ft. Warehouse/storage - 2,345 sq. ft. Patio - 1,150 sq. ft. Zoning T he site is zoned PD-739 which is located within the C entral Village. T he C entral Village district is intended to be a more urban design with reduced setbacks, parking requirements, and denser uses. T he site requires that the building either be 2-story or appear to be 2-story and requires more glass on the façade. Building materials are required to be of brick, stone or other similar materials with metal or other panel systems acting as accent materials. As stated, building setbacks in the C entral Village are reduced and based on the street classification. A 10' setback along Galaxie is required where the current setback is 5', which will require some minor building adjustments as several portions of the building are greater than 10'. Other streets do not require setbacks, such as 152nd. Parking is required to retain the 5' setback that is standard in all zones. Parking fields which have more than 25 stalls are required to have landscape islands/features which are included on the draft plan. T he zone requires that bike racks and pedestrian crosswalks through the parking lot and to major roadways be included. T he plan is not detailed enough at this time to include bike racks, but includes several pedestrian crossings. T he plan proposes an access from Galaxie Ave, which has been sought on other developments within the zone. T his access benefits from, and helps create activity on the primary roadway, a goal of the C entral Village. Due to the site being zoned Planned Development, variances from code are not permitted. However, other than the building setback, the plan appears to be compliant with the PD requirements. Required P arking T he site is proposing 55 total parking stalls and an additional 3 delivery parking stalls for a total of 58 on site. T he restaurant portion of the site requires the most parking stalls as code requires 1 stall per 2.5 seats, a standard for class I restaurants in all zones. A complete analysis of parking follows: Restaurant - Requires 26 stalls Outdoor seating - Requires 6 stalls Mercado - Requires 23 stalls Total Required Parking - 55 stalls T he mercado and restaurant parking demands are at different hours of the day with the mercado being busier earlier in the day, and the restaurant being busier in the evenings. Additionally there are 26 on-street parking stalls within 100' of the site. Site Access T he site is accesses from 152nd St. W. and from Gabella St. T he truck dock and loading area on the north side of the site is well placed next to semi-industrial uses to the north. Truck access will likely be required to come from 152nd to prevent use of the public right- of-way (RO W) for truck turning movements. A auto-turn drawing will be required with a formal submission to ensure trucks are able to utilize the site for all turning/maneuvering movements. Gabella St. cannot be used for trucks to back into the site despite the low traffic counts due to the primary garage access for Gabella occurring adjacent to this site. Landscaping T he site is guided as C ommercial and therefore required to meet that 2.5% of the means construction building cost be utilized for landscaping. Due to the limited greenspace on the site this may present a challenge. In that case, decorative elements such as improved pedestrian concrete crosswalks, private art for public viewing, or other decorative elements may be required. Utilities and Stormwater T he site requires stormwater treatment, which will likely be through an underground system similar to other projects recently approved and constructed. T he C ity Engineer's memo details conditions related to public utilities and stormwater treatment requirements. Signage Signage is typically not reviewed during the development process and the plans submitted do not plan for any signage. However, due to the unique nature of the site being between two residential uses, noting the general requirements is warranted. In all zones, lit signs shall not face residential uses. T his requires the applicant to be creative about sign placement and design. Signs facing west may be lit, while signs facing south or east would directly face residential. B UD G E T I M PAC T: N/A AT TAC HM E NT S : L ocation Map Z oning Map Site P lan Applicant L etter Memo 151ST ST W 152ND ST WGALAXIE AVE GALANTE LN FORTINO ST GABELLA ST GALAXIE AVE SITE Proposed Site ANDALE MERCADO ^ 151ST ST W 152ND ST WGALAXIE AVE GALANTE LN FORTINO ST GABELLA ST GALAXIE AVE RB 244 PD- PD-739 PD-254 SITE Proposed Site ANDALE MERCADO Zoned PD-739 ^ CONCEPT DESIGN SITE PLAN 1:50 May 27, 2021 APPLE VALLEY MEXICAN MARKET BAR PATIO DINING KITCHEN PARKING: 55 STALLS BA K E R Y RETAIL CA S H I E R ( S ) TO R T I L L A BU T C H E R S H O P / D E L I COOLER FR E E Z E R MAIN ENTRY ENTRY ENTRY LOADING DOCK / RAMP TRASH / RECYCLING STORAGE DOCK DELIVERY PARKING (3 STALLS) COOLER CONCEPT DESIGN FLOOR PLAN 1/32" = 1'-0" May 27, 2021 BAR COVERED PATIO DINING KITCHEN PARKING: 55 STALLS TO R T I L L A BU T C H E R S H O P / D E L I T J/ M / E HOOD COOLER, 14X31 (434 SF) ENTRY ENTRY T DISH O HOOD PR E P PREP 53'-0"33'-0"29'-0" DELIVERY PARKING (3 STALLS) OU T D O O R E A T I N G A R E A MAIN ENTRY LOADING DOCK / RAMP TRASH / RECYCLING STORAGE DOCK CARTS T O B COOLER, 12X30 (360 SF) FR E E Z E R , 1 2 X 3 0 (3 6 0 S F ) BA K E R Y CA S H I E R HO O D COOLER & FREEZER 7'-6" X 10 (75 SF) EACH RETAIL WA L K - I N FR E E Z E R PR O D U C E CO O L E R CA K E D I S P L A Y ICE CREAM 70 ' - 6 " 49 ' - 0 " 12 9 ' - 6 " 12 1 ' - 6 " 61 ' - 6 " 30 ' - 0 " 13 ' - 6 " 27'-0" 48'-0" 12'-0" 13 ' - 0 " 13 ' - 0 " 20'-0"10'-0" 15'-0" 15'-0" 10'-0" 36 ' - 0 " 54 ' - 0 " 40'-0" 80 ' - 0 " 10 ' - 0 " 38 ' - 0 " 60 ' - 4 " ST R E E T P A R K I N G : 1 8 S T A L L S ( 9 E A C H S I D E ) STREET PARKING: 4 STALLS T EXPO POTENTIAL FOR STORAGE MEZZANINE ABOVE WITH STAIR ACCESS ONLY - LAYOUT AND SIZE TBD BOOTH SEATING BO O T H S E A T I N G SLIDING DOORS / ACCESS CONTROL TABLE SEATING, LAYOUT TBD OPEN PATIO FIRE PIT 27 ' - 6 " 29'-0" 13'-0" 8' - 0 " APPLE VALLEY MEXICAN MARKET May 27, 2021 MARKET: 9,235 SF WAREHOUSE: 2,345 SF KITCHEN / BAR / RESTAURANT: 5,370 SF PATIO: 1,150 SF BUILDING TOTAL: 18,100 SF WAREHOUSE / DOCK : 2,345 SF RESTAURANT (KITCHEN / DINING / BAR): 5,370 SF MARKET / RETAIL : 9,235 SF COVERED PATIO: 1,150 SF BUILDING TOTAL: 18,100 SF WAREHOUSE / DOCK : 2,100 SF RESTAURANT (KITCHEN / DINING / BAR): 4,500 SF MARKET / RETAIL : 10,500 SF COVERED PATIO: 1,000 SF OWNER BASIS OF DESIGN PROGRAM NOTE:CONCEPT DESIGN FLOOR PLAN 1/32" = 1'-0" APPLE VALLEY MEXICAN MARKET P h 6 12-904 -1 3 3 2 F a x 6 1 2 -9 0 4 -7 3 66 4 2 0 1 C e d a r A v e n u e s o u t h M i n n e a p o l i s , M N 5 5 4 0 7 H a g e n , C h r i s te n s e n & M cI l w a i n A r c h i t e c t s Memorandum To: Attn: Fernando Mellado-Barboza Saul Mellado Ezequiel Quijada Andale Taqueria 7700 Nicollet Avenue Richfield, MN 55423 From: Dan Lawrence, HCM Architects Date: May 27, 2021 Comm. No: 2143 Subject: Apple Valley Mexican Market Concept Design Scope Narrative Copies To: File Description: The following is a Project Scope Narrative intended to assist in defining probable construction costs for the Concept Design of the proposed Mexican Market in Apple Valley, MN. • New Construction located on a 1.48 acre greenfield site: 15136 Galaxie Avenue • City Zoning District: Planned Development, Designation 739 (PD-739), Zone 4 Building Program: The Owner identified four primary space categories for the building scope: A. Retail / Market (includes Bakery & Butcher Shop / Deli) B. Restaurant (Includes Kitchen & Bar) C. Patio (Covered) D. Warehouse (Includes Storage & Loading Dock) See the attached Program Needs Summary for the detailed break-out of proposed spaces and related space sizes for each of these categories. Site Work Scope: • Parking and drives • Site grading • Site excavation for building footings/foundations and sloped loading dock ramp • Water line connection for fire protection and domestic (8”) • Sanitary sewer connection • Natural gas connection • Electrical service connection • Data & Fiber Service • Sidewalks and entry plaza(s) • Landscaping • Carry allowance for site & parking lighting Exterior Finishes (Building Shell) Scope: A. Retail / Market • Single-story – 30’ high box overall with 35’ high tower at southwest corner (entry / tortilla maker) • Architectural Precast Panels with integral brick veneer finish, 12” thick, insulated sandwich panels Memorandum Apple Valley Mexican Market Date: May 27, 2021 H a g e n C h r i s t e n s e n & M c I l w a i n Pag e 2 o f 3 • Internal Steel structure – columns and joists • Reinforced cast-in-place concrete footings • Concrete slab on grade with 8’-0” of perimeter insulation • Prefinished aluminum storefront windows (6”) with 1” insulated glazing, low-e, tinted • Prefinished metal canopies with steel and wood structure B. Restaurant • Single-story – 20’ high box • Internal steel frame structure and joists • Steel stud high-performance PERSIST (Pressure Equalized Rain Screen Insulated Structure Technique) exterior wall system – assume avg height of 20’ • Reinforced cast-in-place concrete footings / foundations, insulated, with ledge for masonry base • Concrete slab on grade with 8’-0” of perimeter insulation • Combination of exterior finishes: stone, brick, wood, metal panel – TBD in next phase of design • Prefinished aluminum storefront windows (6”) with 1” insulated glazing, low-e, tinted • Prefinished metal overhead “garage” doors, operable, with insulated glazing C. Patio (Covered) • Single-story – 15’ high structure • Wood columns, exposed wood beams and wood purlin structure - stain • Concrete slab on grade • Mixture of Stone and wood siding finish at wall surfaces along the patio, under the canopy • Note: Consider alternate option to enclose the patio with operable, sliding glass window assemblies D. Warehouse • Single-story – 25’ high box • Internal steel frame structure and joists • Architectural Precast Panels with exposed aggregate finish, 12” thick, insulated sandwich panels • Reinforced cast-in-place concrete footings and loading dock ramp walls • Concrete slab on grade with 8’-0” of perimeter insulation • Prefinished metal canopy over trash/recycling with steel structure Exterior General Notes: 1. Exterior glazing percentage as defined by the City of Apple Valley equates to 35% of any overall building elevation that fronts a public street. See the attached Concept Design Renderings; the proposed design is in compliance. 2. Roofing for all areas of the building: 60 mil fully adhered membrane roof assembly over continuous rigid insulation and metal deck 3. The building will be Fully Sprinklered; this is to include a dry system for all exterior covered canopies Interior Finishes Scope: A. Retail / Market • Polished concrete floor finish • Metal stud wall and ceiling soffit assemblies with gypsum board finish – paint • Owner Branding elements, i.e. options for murals or signage • Paint exposed steel structure and HVAC: columns, joists, roof deck • Bakery & Butcher Shop / Deli: ➢ Quarry tile floor finish and epoxy grout with coved tile base, 4” up the wall ➢ Stainless Steel back wall panels and/or 6’-0” high minimum wall tile finish – locations TBD ➢ Vinyl coated ceiling tiles in all areas above food prep and service Memorandum Apple Valley Mexican Market Date: May 27, 2021 H a g e n C h r i s t e n s e n & M c I l w a i n Pag e 3 o f 3 B. Restaurant • Kitchen ➢ Quarry tile floor finish and epoxy grout with coved tile base, 4” up the wall ➢ Stainless Steel wall panels and FRP wall panels ➢ Vinyl coated ceiling tiles in all areas above food prep and service ➢ Stainless steel counters at expo line and bi-acting doors with • Bar ➢ Tile flooring with Schluter cove base and tile base above ➢ Inside of bar = FRP at die wall behind equipment up to bottom of bar top ➢ Solid Surface bar top (Note: option concrete top) ➢ Outside of bar = die wall can be a mixture of materials: Wood, accent tile, steel ➢ Mixture of ceiling finishes: Wood beams - stain, metal stud and gypsum board soffit assemblies-paint, exposed steel frame and joists – paint ➢ Owner Branding elements, i.e. options for murals or signage • Dining ➢ Polished Concrete floor finish ➢ Accent wall tile full height at expo line ➢ Mixture of wall finishes: paint, wood, stone, steel ➢ Mixture of ceiling finishes: Wood, metal stud and gypsum board soffit assemblies-paint, exposed steel frame and joists – paint ➢ Owner Branding elements, i.e. options for murals or signage • Toilet Rooms (Note: similar for Warehouse and Retail toilet rooms) ➢ Tile flooring w/ perimeter Schluter cove base, provide tile base at non-wet walls ➢ Wall tile up to 8’-0” AFF (to ceiling) – all wet walls ➢ Ceilings to be gypsum board assembly ➢ Solid surface vanity with UC lavatories ➢ Toilet accessories and partitions C. Patio (Covered) • Exterior Only – see section noted above D. Warehouse • Sealed concrete flooring finish • Paint exposed steel structure and HVAC: columns, joists, roof deck • Paint inside face of precast wall panels • Staff Break Room – provide base cabinet with sink and solid surface countertop; refrigerator and microwave by Owner, provide ACT lay-in ceiling • Staff Office – provide painted metal stud and gypsum board wall assemblies with ACT lay-in ceiling above • Note: See Plan – Potential for storage mezzanine above with stair access only E. Equipment and Furniture • See Owner for all FFE lists and requirements Interior General Notes: 1. Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing scope is assumed as Design Build 2. Assume all LED lighting fixtures 3. Carry an allowance for security, phone, data, low-voltage throughout End of Memorandum Hagen, Christensen and McIlwain Architects Apple Valley Mexican Market & Restaurant Concept Design Program Needs Summary Concept Design Program May 27, 2021 Contact: Fernando Mellado-Barboza, Saul Mellado & Ezekial Quijada Owner Concept Plan Design Future Future Base Need xx year xx year 2021 2021 20xx 20xx A)Market sf sf sf sf Comments Overall Layout 210'x50'130'x70' Overall Size (Area in SF)10,500 9,235 1 Main Entry (from Parking Lot)420 0 0 Includes space for Carts 2 Cashier 500 Three Lanes Proposed 3 Retail (Market)5,215 4 Bakery / Tortilla Machine 1,815 5 Butcher Shop / Deli 905 Additional Site Scope: Outdoor Seating Area 6 Entry Only Vestibule (from Street)120 7 Toilet Room 70 Single, Unisex 8 Janitor / Mechanical / Electrical 190 Square Footage Sub-Totals:10,500 9,235 0 0 Owner Concept Plan Design Future Future Base Need xx year xx year 2021 2021 20xx 20xx B)Restaurant sf sf sf sf Comments Overall Layout 90'x50'98'x69' L-Shaped Configuration Overall Size (Area in SF)4,500 5,370 1 Entry 64 0 0 2 Toilet Rooms (Sub-Total)365 Mens & Womens 3 Kitchen (Shared w/ Butcher Shop & Deli)Sub-total: 2,109 SF A)Cooler(s)434 B)Prep Area(s)810 Date: Size Projections Size Projections Hagen, Christensen and McIlwain Architects C)Hood(s) / Expo Line 555 D)Dish Washing 220 E)Office 90 4 Dining 1,715 Seating layout TBD 5 Bar 930 Includes Adjacent Seating Areas (Tables / Booths) 6 Circulation (Corridor to Market)187 Square Footage Sub-Totals:4,500 5,370 0 0 Owner Concept Plan Design Future Future Base Need xx year xx year 2021 2021 20xx 20xx C)Patio sf sf sf sf Comments Overall Layout 20'x50'49'x53'13'-0" Wide Overall Size (Area in SF)1,000 1,150 L-Shaped Configuration Square Footage Sub-Totals:1,000 1,150 0 0 NOTE: Potential for additional open Patio space (not covered) with fire pit (See Floor Plan) Owner Concept Plan Design Future Future Base Need xx year xx year 2021 2021 20xx 20xx D)Warehouse / Storage sf sf sf sf Comments Overall Layout 70'x30'61'x48'L-Shaped Configuration Overall Size (Area in SF)2,100 2,345 1 Office 90 0 0 2 Staff Toilet Room 70 Single, Unisex 3 Staff Break Room 160 4 Storage Area (Racking)560 5 Cooler (Display & Storage)360 6 Freezer 360 Size Projections Size Projections Hagen, Christensen and McIlwain Architects 7 Trash / Recycling 105 Additional Site Scope: Covered Dumpster Area 8 Loading Dock 225 Additional Site Scope: Concrete Ramp down 9 Circulation 415 Square Footage Sub-Totals:2,100 2,345 0 0 NOTE: Potential for Storage Mezzanine above with stair access only - Layout and Size TBD (See Floor Plan) E)Equipment & Furniture Qty Location Weight Comments See Owner Provided FFE Lists Owner Concept Plan Design Future Future Apple Valley Mexican Market & Restaurant Base Need xx year xx year SQUARE FOOTAGE SUMMARY 2021 2021 20xx 20xx Total Staff/Support Spaces 4,644 Total Public Spaces 13,456 GRAND TOTAL 18,100 18,100 0 0 Unit Name Size | Footprint Utilities Size Projections CITY OF MEMO Public Works TO: Alex Sharpe, Planner FROM: Brandon S. Anderson, PE, City Engineer DATE: June 9, 2021 SUBJECT: Andale Sketch Plan Review per plan submitted 5/27/2021 General 1. All work and infrastructure within public easements or right of way shall be to City standards. 2. Provide a narrative of how the buildings will be constructed and any impacts. The narrative shall include the following:  Shoring (if applicable) • Protection of public utilities within existing drainage and utility easements shall be protected at all times.  Material Storage.  Haul routes to and from the site.  Phasing 3. No construction work shall begin prior to a preconstruction meeting conference with a Public works and a Building Inspections representative. 4. Public Work Department (952-953-2400) shall be notified a minimum of 48 hours for any required water main shut downs and/or connections. 5. City of Apple Valley Water Department shall operate all valves on public owned mains and valves connecting private lines to public owned mains. Permits 6. Provide a copy of the executed Minnesota Department of Health, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Met Council, Department of Labor and any other required permits prior to construction. 7. A right of way permit will be required for all work within public easements or right of way. 8. A Natural Resource Management Permit (NRMP) will be required prior to any land disturbing activity commences. 9. Since the site will be disturbing more than 1 acre and creating more than 1 acre of new impervious. The applicant will be subject to the requirements of the State NPDES Construction Stormwater Permit. The applicant must provide proof of permit. Site 10. Final site plan shall be reviewed with the construction plans and approved by City Engineer. 11. Preliminary plat should include 10’ drainage and utility easements along all property boundaries adjacent to ROW and 5’ adjacent to property lines. 12. Provide Auto turn drawing utilizing Apple Valley emergency vehicle to ensure adequate emergency and service vehicle circulation to and from the building. 13. All truck deliveries and turning movements shall be accommodated within the site and not use public roadways for internal circulation. 14. Provide Traffic Forecast Information (Anticipated trips and distribution for the proposed land use) for review by City Engineer. Storm Sewer, Grading. Drainage, and Erosion Control 15. Final Grading Plans shall be reviewed and approved by City Engineer. 16. Final Storm water Management Plan shall be reviewed and approved by City Engineer. 17. Final locations and sizes of Storm Sewer shall be reviewed with the final construction plans and approved by City Engineer. 18. Provide storm sewer calculations for storm water requirements. (Rational method including Hydraulic grade lines). 19. The site is located within the Vermillion River Watershed. The Vermillion River main stem, tributaries, and several lakes are currently listed as impaired for Excess Nutrients. In accordance with 2018 Surface Water Management Plan (SWMP), several storm water policies would need to be addressed for new or redevelopment of the site:  Policy 6.1 The City requires compliance with all applicable post-construction water quality criteria for new and redevelopment activity adopted by the Black Dog Watershed Management Organization and the Vermillion River Watershed Joint Powers Organization, as described in the BDWMO Watershed Management Plan (2012, as amended) and VRWJPO Standards (2016, as amended).  Policy 6.2 The City requires that all new, redeveloped, or expanded commercial, industrial, multiple residential, or institutional development provide infiltration for a volume equivalent to 0.5 inches of runoff over the area of the development.  Policy 6.3 The City requires that new and redevelopment activity of 0.2 acres or more shall be required to achieve no-net-increase in average annual total suspended solids (TSS) and total phosphorus (TP) loading compared to the pre- development condition of the site.  Policy 6.4 The City may require additional treatment measures as needed for any development or re-development activity to protect downstream receiving waters, including, but not limited to, additional measures in TMDLs or WRAPS watersheds plans.  Policy 6.5 of SWMP: Ensure there is 3 feet of separation from the bottom of the infiltration basins and the seasonally saturated soils. 20. In accordance with SWMP policy 1.5, the city requires that new development and redevelopment activities do not increase peak runoff rates relative to pre-project runoff rates for the 1-year, 2-year, 10-year and 100-year critical storm event. The City may impose more stringent rate control requirements if the capacity of the downstream system is limited. 21. City Ordinance 152.55(B): Maintenance agreement for the proposed storm water management areas will be required and must be recorded. 22. City Ordinance 155.350(C): Maximum impervious surface will be limited, see ordinance for more information. Sanitary Sewer and Water main 23. Final locations and sizes of sanitary sewer and water main shall be reviewed with the final construction plans and approved by City Engineer. 24. Domestic water and fire service shall be split outside the existing building and the valves shall be located 1.5 times the height of the building away from the building or placed in location readily accessible per City of Apple Valley standard detail plate SER-6. Include this detail on the detail sheet. 25. Remove unused sanitary and water services to the main and indicate on plans. 26. Identify Irrigation service location(s) if applicable per SER-4. 27. Provide a drawing showing required hydrant coverage for site. Landscape and Natural Resources 28. No trees will be permitted in public easements or ROW. I T E M: 6.B. P L A NNI NG C O MMI S S I O N ME E T I NG D AT E :J une 16, 2021 S E C T I O N:Other Business Description: U-Haul A ddition S taff Contact: A lex Sharpe, Planning and Economic Dev. S pec. Department / Division: Community Development Department Applicant: U-Haul A pple Valley P roject Number: P C21-19-B Applicant Date: 60 Days: 120 Days: AC T I O N RE Q UE S T E D: N/A S UM M ARY: U-Haul has applied for a sketch plan review to add a 17,000 building addition at their current site located at 6895 151st St. W. T he 3.08 acre site is located in the southeast corner of Galaxie and 150th/C SA H 42. U-Haul currently operates a self-storage, vehicle/equipment rental, and exterior storage area for customer vehicles on the site. T he sketch plan proposes to remove the exterior customer vehicle storage and replace this use with the 17,000 sq. ft. building to store "U-boxes". T his product is similar to self-storage but has some key differences. T he U-Box product is similar to a PO D product already in the market. T he product is dropped off at a customer location where they fill the box with items they seek to store. T he U-Box is then picked up by U-Haul and stored in their building. To access their items, the customer must request that the U-Box be delivered to a suitable location and may not be accessed on site. T he inability to access the stored customer materials on site is the primary difference between this product and a full self-storage facility. T he applicant narrative attached to this report provides additional details on the product. B AC K G RO UND: Site P lan T he plan proposes to add an additional 17,000 sq. ft. structure to the western side of the lot where exterior storage of customer vehicles is the current use. T he site accesses would remain on 151st and all truck maneuvering will be required to occur on site. An auto-turn drawing was requested by staff and is included in the sketch plan demonstrating that the semis transporting the U-Boxes do not utilize public right-of-way (RO W) for maneuvering. Zoning T he site is zoned P D-254 Zone 1, which allows self-storage facilities and exterior storage by Conditional Use Permit (C UP). A C UP was previously granted for the exterior storage of customer and rental vehicles in 1999. T his application will require amending the existing C UP, or rescinding the old and approving a new one with an updated site plan and conditions. T he 1999 C UP limited the number of rental vehicles permitted on site to 29. Since that time the number of vehicles stored on site has often exceeded this number, often making the site impassable for fire should the need arise. If this C UP were to be amended, more stringent conditions on the location of rental vehicles and trailers would be proposed. T hese would include the condition that the public street shall not be used for rental vehicle storage at any time, as this has been a common practice. T he current building coverage is approximately 30%. A PD amendment would be required for this application due to the P D's restriction on building coverage at a maximum of 30%. T he site plan also shows the proposed building at less than the 10' side setback required. T he front setback is required to be 30', which appears to be met. PD-254 and the regular zoning code do not allow multiple principal structures on the site. To allow these structures to be considered a single entity a roof structure, connecting the two is required. C urrently the site plan does not show this, but the elevation/architectural plans do. T he applicant is proposing a 50' wide roof section connecting the two and creating a single structure by code. T his roof is required to be at a height where a fire truck can pass underneath and will require additional fire rating. P arking T he site currently has 58 parking stalls outside of the area designated for vehicle exterior storage. T he new site plan proposed a total of 59 stalls and has the opportunity to add more behind the proposed building. T his area could also be designated for trailer and rental vehicle storage. T he proposed addition would not be open to the public and would not generate additional parking demand for staff as the building is primarily used for storage. At most a single employee parking stall would be required, which is being provided. Landscaping A landscape plan was not included for review with the sketch plan. T he new building will be subject to landscaping requirements. N ew landscaping will be required at the industrial rate of 1.5% of the means construction cost. T he site has limited space for landscaping and has limited ability to improve public spaces through improved materials. Screening of the proposed building on the east and additional parking to the north will be required. T he applicant is encouraged to utilize a diverse set of species to ensure year round screening. Building Materials and Elev ations T he proposed building elevations call for a precast concrete finish, which can be done as an accent material but is not permitted to be the primary building façade material. T he finishes of the proposed structure are required to match the existing materials on the existing structure. T he building approvals from 1999 specifically note that the west side of the structure may utilize less glass material as they will be facing the on-site exterior storage, landscape screening, and the building was set back over 130' from the property line. T he proposed structure is much closer to the property line and therefore more visible from public and private spaces. T he existing structure also has extensive brick material as the primary material at the pedestrian levels of the structure. Stormwater and Utilities T he C ity Engineer memo attached provides greater detail on storm and utility requirements. Stormwater treatment will be required due to the amount of disturbance proposed. As the site is limited for additional space, an underground system may be required, which is consistent with several other projects approved or under construction. B UD G E T I M PAC T: N/A AT TAC HM E NT S : L ocation Map Z oning Map Plan S et Elevations Applicant L etter Memo Memo 151ST ST W 150TH ST W GALAXIE AVE GABELLA ST FORUM PATH 150TH ST W GALAXIE AVE SITE Proposed Site U-Haul U-Box Addition Zoned PD-254 ^ 151ST ST W 150TH ST W GALAXIE AVE GABELLA ST FORUM PATH 150TH ST W GALAXIE AVE A PD-254 PD-254SITE Proposed Site U-Haul U-Box Addition Zoned PD-254 ^ PROPOSED BUILDING 17,800 SQ. FT. ISGInc.com CAD FILE NAME Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning 25154 CONCEPT 2 - FIRE ISG PROJECT NO. 21-25154 U-HAUL APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA - 05/12/2021 Sheet Number 1 of 1 FIRE ACCESS N0 SCALE: 1" = FEET 30 60 30 26' WIDE FIRE ACCESS LANE 6' 13' 4' 12' R54' R28' PROPOSED BUILDING 17,800 SQ. FT. ISGInc.com CAD FILE NAME Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning 25154 CONCEPT 2 ISG PROJECT NO. 21-25154 U-HAUL APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA - 04/16/2021 Sheet Number 1 of 2 CONCEPT 2 N0 SCALE: 1" = FEET 30 60 30 93' 19 0 ' 29 ' 39' 10 ' PROPOSED BUILDING 17,800 SQ. FT. ISGInc.com CAD FILE NAME Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning 25154 CONCEPT 2 ISG PROJECT NO. 21-25154 U-HAUL APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA - 04/13/2021 Sheet Number 2 of 2 CONCEPT 2 - TRUCK TURNING N0 SCALE: 1" = FEET 30 60 30 A2-122 A2-12 A2-11 A2-11 1 2 1 19 0 ' - 0 " 93' - 0" 101 Room 105 RESTROOM LOADING DOCK EXISTING SELF-STORAGE MECH/ELECT. EQUIPMENT WALL LEGEND EXISTING CONSTRUCTION TO REMAIN NEW CONSTRUCTION SHEET NOTES A. ALL INTERIOR PARTITION WALLS SHALL BE WALL TYPE __, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. N 0 1/ 2 " 1" 2" 1/ 4 " PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE CLIENT PROJECT NO. TITLE SHEET PROJECT REVIEWED BY THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. 5/27/2021 10:03:47 AM A1-21 FIRST FLOOR PLAN Author Designer MM/DD/YY Checker APPLE VALLEY MINNESOTA 400 2515 A1-21 21-2515 WAREHOUSE U-HAUL P R E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N P R E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N A1-21 FIRST FLOOR PLAN 1/16" = 1'-0"1 FIRST FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTE LEGEND REVISION SCHEDULE DATE DESCRIPTION BY FIRST FLOOR 100' -0" EXISTING SELF-STORAGE T.O. WALL 140' -0" FIRST FLOOR 100' -0" T.O. WALL 140' -0" 0 1 / 2 " 1 " 2 " 1/ 4 " PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE CLIENT PROJECT NO. TITLE SHEET PROJECT REVIEWED BY THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. 5/27/2021 10:03:48 AM A2-11 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Author Designer MM/DD/YY Checker APPLE VALLEY MINNESOTA 400 2515 A2-11 21-2515 WAREHOUSE U-HAUL P R E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N P R E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N A2-11 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 1/8" = 1'-0"1 NORTH ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"2 WEST ELEVATION EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE MARK MATERIAL TYPE MANUFACTURER MODEL / SIZE COLOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION COMMENTS EF-1 PRECAST CONCRETE FABCON VERSACORE + GREEN SANDWICH LIGHT SANDBLAST, ACCENT BAND TO BE 3/8" X 8" REVEAL REVISION SCHEDULE DATE DESCRIPTION BY FIRST FLOOR 100' -0" T.O. WALL 140' -0" FIRST FLOOR 100' -0" T.O. WALL 140' -0" N 0 1 / 2 " 1 " 2 " 1/ 4 " PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE CLIENT PROJECT NO. TITLE SHEET PROJECT REVIEWED BY THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. 5/27/2021 10:03:49 AM A2-12 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Author Designer 05/12/21 Checker APPLE VALLEY MINNESOTA 400 2515 A2-12 21-2515 WAREHOUSE U-HAUL P R E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N P R E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N A2-12 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS REVISION SCHEDULE DATE DESCRIPTION BY 1/8" = 1'-0"1 SOUTH ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"2 EAST ELEVATION MAY 28, 2021 Alex Sharpe Planning & Economic Development Specialist City of Apple Valley 7100 147th Street W Apple Valley, MN 55124 Alex.sharpe@applevalleymn.gov 7900 International Drive + Suite 550 + Bloomington, MN 55425 952.426.0699 + ISGInc.com Architecture + Engineering + Environmental + Planning RE: SKETCH PLAN NARRATIVE U -HAUL – 6895 151 ST ST W Alex, Enclosed is an application for a sketch plan review for a building addition for the existing U-Haul facility located at 6895 151st St. W. This building addition will allow the for the expansion of services that U-Haul offers. U-Haul is excited about the new service, U-Box Portable Storage and Moving Containers. This service allows convenient, flexible, and secure storage options for U-Haul’s customers that need their personal items stored and shipped. The new building addition will function as a warehouse for the U-Box containers. These containers are never stored outside and are loaded off site at the customer’s property. Unlike self-storage, the boxes are never accessed by customers on the site. The boxes are transported to the facility if the customer requires time between when the U-Box is delivered at the initial location and the destination. The storage of the boxes is intended to be temporary. The structure itself will be an approximately 17,800 sq. ft. building that will be connected to the existing structure to the east by a roof. The building will have a limited interior design with space for bathrooms, electrical and mechanical rooms, and custodial facilities. A loading dock will be located on the southwest corner of the building with two loading areas. The exterior of the building will be designed to match the exterior of the existing buildings. Please contact me at 952.426.0699 or via email at Ryan.Anderson@ISGInc.com with any questions or if there is any additional information we can provide in support of this project. Sincerely, Ryan Anderson, PE Civil Engineer Ryan.Anderson@ISGInc.com CITY OF MEMO Public Works TO: Alex Sharpe, Planner FROM: Brandon S. Anderson, PE, City Engineer DATE: June 9, 2021 SUBJECT: U-Haul Sketch Plan Review per plan submitted 5/28/2021 General 1. All work and infrastructure within public easements or right of way shall be to City standards. 2. Provide a narrative of how the buildings will be constructed and any impacts. The narrative shall include the following: • Shoring (if applicable) • Protection of public utilities within existing drainage and utility easements shall be protected at all times. • Material Storage. • Haul routes to and from the site. • Phasing 3. No construction work shall begin prior to a preconstruction meeting conference with a Public works and a Building Inspections representative. 4. Public Work Department (952-953-2400) shall be notified a minimum of 48 hours for any required water main shut downs and/or connections. 5. City of Apple Valley Water Department shall operate all valves on public owned mains and valves connecting private lines to public owned mains. 6. All retaining walls over 48” from bottom of footing to the top of wall shall be designed and certified by a structural engineer and submitted to building inspections for final approval. Retaining walls over 4’ will require a fence above the wall. Provide additional details and/or specifications for retaining wall block. Retaining walls shall be privately owned and maintained. Retaining walls are not allowed in drainage and utility easements without an approved encroachment agreement. Permits 7. Provide a copy of the executed Minnesota Department of Health, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Met Council, Department of Labor and any other required permits prior to construction. 8. A right of way permit will be required for all work within public easements or right of way. 9. A Natural Resource Management Permit (NRMP) will be required prior to any land disturbing activity commences. 10. Since the site will be disturbing more than 1 acre and creating more than 1 acre of new impervious. The applicant will be subject to the requirements of the State NPDES Construction Stormwater Permit. The applicant must provide proof of permit. Site 11. Include a signage and striping plan for main entrance of building. 12. Preliminary plat should include 10’ drainage and utility easements along all property boundaries adjacent to ROW and 5’ adjacent to property lines. 13. Provide Auto turn drawing utilizing Apple Valley emergency vehicle to ensure adequate emergency and service vehicle circulation to and from the building. 14. All truck deliveries and turning movements shall be accommodated within the site and not use public roadways for internal circulation. 15. Provide Traffic Forecast Information (Anticipated trips and distribution for the proposed land use) for review by City Engineer. Storm Sewer, Grading. Drainage, and Erosion Control 16. Final Grading Plans shall be reviewed and approved by City Engineer. 17. Final Storm water Management Plan shall be reviewed and approved by City Engineer. 18. Final locations and sizes of Storm Sewer shall be reviewed with the final construction plans and approved by City Engineer. 19. Provide storm sewer calculations for storm water requirements. (Rational method including Hydraulic grade lines). 20. The site is located within the Vermillion River Watershed. The Vermillion River main stem, tributaries, and several lakes are currently listed as impaired for Excess Nutrients. In accordance with 2018 Surface Water Management Plan (SWMP), several storm water policies would need to be addressed for new or redevelopment of the site: • Policy 6.1 The City requires compliance with all applicable post-construction water quality criteria for new and redevelopment activity adopted by the Black Dog Watershed Management Organization and the Vermillion River Watershed Joint Powers Organization, as described in the BDWMO Watershed Management Plan (2012, as amended) and VRWJPO Standards (2016, as amended). • Policy 6.2 The City requires that all new, redeveloped, or expanded commercial, industrial, multiple residential, or institutional development provide infiltration for a volume equivalent to 0.5 inches of runoff over the area of the development. • Policy 6.3 The City requires that new and redevelopment activity of 0.2 acres or more shall be required to achieve no-net-increase in average annual total suspended solids (TSS) and total phosphorus (TP) loading compared to the pre- development condition of the site. • Policy 6.4 The City may require additional treatment measures as needed for any development or re-development activity to protect downstream receiving waters, including, but not limited to, additional measures in TMDLs or WRAPS watersheds plans. • Policy 6.5 of SWMP: Ensure there is 3 feet of separation from the bottom of the infiltration basins and the seasonally saturated soils. 21. In accordance with SWMP policy 1.5, the city requires that new development and redevelopment activities do not increase peak runoff rates relative to pre-project runoff rates for the 1-year, 2-year, 10-year and 100-year critical storm event. The City may impose more stringent rate control requirements if the capacity of the downstream system is limited. 22. City Ordinance 152.55(B): Maintenance agreement for the proposed storm water management areas will be required and must be recorded. 23. City Ordinance 155.350(C): Maximum impervious surface will be limited, see ordinance for more information. Sanitary Sewer and Water main 24. Final locations and sizes of sanitary sewer and water main shall be reviewed with the final construction plans and approved by City Engineer. Landscape and Natural Resources 25. No trees will be permitted in public easements or ROW. Apple Valley Fire Department MEMO City of Apple Valley TO: Alex Sharpe- Planner FROM: Brian Kilmartin, Fire Marshal DATE: April 29, 2021 SUBJECT: U Haul Expansion- 6895 151st Street Alex, I have some questions/ concerns regarding the expansion. - Fire Department Access, the Fire Dept. needs access around the building. In the current status access is at times difficult due to trucks stored in aisle ways. - If a roof is constructed to bridge from the existing building to the new storage location the roof will need to be high enough for fire apparatus to drive through. - This addition will be required to have a Fire Suppression system installed - All turning movements as specified in the current Minnesota State Fire Code (MSFC) will need to be met. Brian Kilmartin Fire Marshal I T E M: 6.C. P L A NNI NG C O MMI S S I O N ME E T I NG D AT E :J une 16, 2021 S E C T I O N:Other Business Description: Review of Upcoming S chedule and Other Updates S taff Contact: B reanna Vincent, Department Assistant Department / Division: Community Development Department AC T I O N RE Q UE S T E D: N/A S UM M ARY: Next P lanning Commission Meetings: Wednesday, J une 30, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. Public hearing applications due by 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday, J une 2, 2021. Site plan, variance applications due by 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday, J une 16, 2021. Wednesday, J uly 21, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. Public hearing applications due by 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday, J une 23, 2021. Site plan, variance applications due by 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday, J uly 7, 2021. Next City Council Meetings: T hursday, J uly 8, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. T hursday, J uly 22, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. B AC K G RO UND: N/A B UD G E T I M PAC T: N/A