Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025-11-05 PC MinutesCITY OF APPLE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES November 5, 2025 1. CALL TO ORDER The City of Apple Valley Planning Commission Meeting was called to order by Chair Kurtz Scanlan at 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Jodi Kurtz, Paul Scanlan, Dave Schindler, Becky Sandahl, Jeff Prewitt, and Douglas Hlas Member(s) Absent: Phil Mahowald City Staff: Community Development Director Tim Benetti, City Clerk Christina Scipioni, City Planner Terri Dill, Planner Carter Hayes, City Attorney Sharon Hills, and Department Assistant Breanna Vincent. 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Chair Kurtz asked if there were any changes to the agenda – None. MOTION: Commissioner Schindler moved, seconded by Commissioner Scanlan, approving the agenda. Roll call vote: Ayes - 6 – Nays – 0. 3. CONSENT ITEMS A. Approval of Minutes of September 3, 2025 MOTION: Commissioner Scanlan moved, seconded by Commissioner Hlas approving the minutes of September 3, 2025. Roll call vote: Ayes - 6 – Nays – 0. 4. PUBLIC HEARING A. Planned Development No. 290 – Zone 4 Text Amendment Chair Kurtz opened the public hearing. Planner Hayes provided a brief presentation. Commissioner Hlas asked where the daycare is located within the buffer as well as the school off 147th. Commissioner Schindler asked if the applicant has looked into other locations. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes November 5, 2025 Page 2 of 3 Planner Hayes stated that the applicant currently operates a tobacco store in this location and is preliminarily approved through the Office of Cannabis Management (OCM) and is now looking for a site that complies with the zoning requirements of the municipality. The applicant has not inquired with City staff for other locations. Chair Kurtz asked if the applicant recently opened the tobacco shop and if the assumption was that they would be able to operate a cannabis business in the location. Planner Hayes stated that the tobacco shop opened within the last year but was not able to clarify whether the applicant assumed they would be able to operate a cannabis business there. The OCM does not allow co-location and it is not know whether the applicant was aware of this at the time. Chair Kurtz asked whether the leaser would be the one to notify the applicant of this. Planner Hayes stated that he is not aware of any discussion between the applicant and leaser. The applicant, Mike Malik, was not present for questions. With no further comments, Chair Kurtz closed the public hearing. MOTION: Commissioner Scanlan moved, seconded by Commissioner Hlas, to recommend denial of the draft ordinance amending Chapter 155, Appendix F, adding Section A2-5(C) to exempt cannabis retailers in Zone 4 of this Planned Development from the special use setback buffers in Section 155.320. Roll call vote: Ayes – 6 – Nays – 0. 5. LAND USE None