Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/20/1999CITY OF APPLE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES January 20,1999 1. CALL TO ORDER The City of Apple Valley Planning Commission meeting was called to order by Vice Chair Blundetto at 7:02 p.m. Members Present:, Tom Melander, Ice McNamara, Frank Blundetto, Diane Nagler, Tim Burke. Members Absent: Karen Edgeton. Staff Present: Assistant Planner Tom Lovelace, Community Development Director Rick Kelley, Nelda Werkmeister, City Attorney Mike Dougherty. Others Present: David Bocek, Bob Egan, Steve Johnston, Dick Curry, Kristi Olson, Gary Tushie, Jim Deanovic. 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Coxnrrmnity Development Director Rick Kelley noted that item 6B has been withdrawn, and an item 7D "Commission Appointments" is added. MOTION: Burke moved, seconded by McNamaza, to approve the agenda as amended. The motion carried 5-0. 3. APPROVAL OF JANUARY 6,1999, MINUTES MOTION: Burke moved, seconded by McNamara, to approve the minutes as submitted. The motion carried 5-0. 4. CONSENT ITEMS -None - 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS -None - 6. LAND USE/ACTION ITEMS A. Site Plan/Building Permit Authorization for Revised Building Elevation-Lamperts Lumber Assistant Planner Tom Lovelace introduced the item. He compazed drawings ofthe west elevation - -that which was approved by the City Council to that which was submitted to the Inspections Department with a building pemut application. The petitioner Bob Egan of Lamperts Lumber gave a history of the building project, noting they were on a fast track to replace a building destroyed by fire. He feh the City was looking for four things in regazd to the new building: (1) precast concrete panels; (2) integrated color; (3) azchitectural sur6ce; (4) glass on the front of the building. He went onto say the structure looked more like an office building with the windows on the front, and it didn't fit with the interior layout. Egan distnbutedto the Commissioners a photograph ofthe building as constructed. The Commissioners all agreed that some glass is needed on the front of the building. There was consensus that staff wuld determine what was acceptable, whether real or false windows. Planning Cowmission Minutes January 20,1999 Page 2 MOTION: McNamara moved, seconded by Burke, to recommend approval ofthe amendmentto the site plan/building pemmit for conshuction ofthe west elevation as revised. Motion failed 0-5. B. Street Setback Variance for Partial Demo6tion/Remodel of Fisting OflicelShowroom Building-Apple Valley Business Center Item withdrawn. 7. OTHER BUSINESS A. Sketch Plan for Revised Development of Palomino Cliffs Lovelace introduced the item, noting that 22 units are proposed for the site. His review of somewhat similar project sites revealed that Rodeo Hills had some setback variances; Hunters Wood had none, and the Summit received a blanket variance pushing everything further south to increase the distance from the adjacent single family residences. Nagler asked about the status ofthe trees on site. Lovelace responded that the Natural Resources Management ordinance, which was not in effect at the time of the original approval, would require a new tree survey and replacement plan. Steve Johnston with Landfomm Engincerhmg, representing the petitioner, showed several 3-D images. He pointed out how the substandard setbacks, in his opinion, did not visually impact the project or the future owners ofthe units. He stated they would increase replacement plantings to mitigate the removal of some mature trees, some of which have been removed and some which appeaz stressed. They are committed to improving the wetland and consider it an asset to the property. He went onto say he didn't feel it was fair to compare this project with the original project because SVK is not dealing with a raw piece of land as the previous developer was. Dick Curry, representing the petitioner, described a similar development of theirs in St. Louis Park. He said that people like it, the marketplace accepts it, and that parkicnlar project's buildings were even closer together than what is proposed here. Nagler said she thought the pmect is too dense, the proposed sideyazd setbacks are unacceptable here, and the front ofthe units appeaz to block the view. McNamaza stated he is willing to accept the canting of buildings to the street and allowing variances for that, but he is concerned about the number of units proposed on the site. Burke agreed. Melander also agreed with McNaznara's commnents, but stated he was concerned about the elevations and their close proximity to each other. Blundetto said the azehitecture was good,. and that duplexes versus 4-plexes were probably good. B. Sketch Plan far 3-Story 108-Unit Senior Apartment Complex at 140th Street & Pennock Lovelace inrroduced the item. Kristi Olson, CEO of Twin City Christian Homes(TCCH), introduced herself and described her organiTation as a non-profit that exists to serve older adults. She distributed a packet of information Planning Commission Minutes January 20,1999 Page 3 about TCCH to the Couunissioners. The proposal for Apple Valley is an independent living facility with a number of amenites. Gary Tucci, azchitect for the project, pointed out the outdoor patio, apple orchard, gazebo and gardening opportunities for residents. He stated they have no issue with providing a second driveway entrance to the Facility. Consuhing Engineer Keith Gordon said that Pennock would probably be more desirable for a second entrance than would 140th Street. Tucci went onto descnbe other amenities, such as a workshop, arts and crafts room, and a full kitchen. Melander commented that he liked the project. Blandetto queried whether the ea~terior materials comply with the ordinance. Nagler said she liked the use ofthe green space. McNamara. noted the proposed density exceeds both the zoning and comprehensive plan guidelines. Lovelace responded that staff and the petitioner aze looking at alternatives to accommodate that, such as a planned development or senior housing zoning category, aclarowledging that a senior use is different. fiom a straight apartment use. Because of that, the parking ratios could also be looked at. McNamara went on to say he really likes what he sees and hopes there is a vehicle to allow it to happen. C. Receive 1998 Attendance Record The 1998 attendance record was received and noted. D. Commission Appointments Kelley reported that the terms of Blundetto, Nagler and McNamara. end on Mazch 1. He would like to report to the City Council who is interested in continuing to serve. All three indicated their desire to remain on the Planning Commission. E. Update on Animal Emergency Care Monument Sign (Pennock Avenue) Kelley said the sign has been moved and is now in compliance. 8. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Burke moved, seconded by Nagler, to adjourn the meeting at 8:55 p.m. Motion carried 5-0.