HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/02/2004CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
JUNE 2, 2004
1. CALL TO ORDER
The City of Apple Valley Planning Commission meeting was called to Order by Vice Chair
Jeannine Churchill at 7:00 p.m.
Members Present: *Karen Edgeton, Jim Hadley, Jeannine Churchill, David Schindler, and
Alan Duff
*Karen Edgeton arrived at 7:02 p.m.
Members Absent: Tim Burke and Tom Melander
Staff Present: Community Development Director Rick Kelley, City Planner Tom Lovelace,
City Attorney Sharon Hills, Associate City Planner Kathy Bodmer, and Assistant City
Engineer Jacob Fick.
2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Vice Chair Churchill asked if there were any changes to the Agenda. There being none, she
called for its approval.
MOTION: Commissioner Hadley moved, seconded by Duff, to approve the Agenda as
amended. The motion carried 4-0.
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF MAY 19, 2004
Vice Chair Churchill asked if there were any changes to the minutes. Commissioner Duff
made the following amendment to the minutes (highlighted in bold print):
The City of Apple Valley Planning Commission meeting was called to Order by
Chair Karen Edgeton at 7:00 p.m.
MOTION: Commissioner Duff moved, seconded by Hadley, to approve the minutes of the
May 19, 2004, meeting as amended. The motion carried 4-0.
4. CONSENT ITEMS
A. Glynn Residential Setback Variance -Consideration of a 3' Variance from the
Approved Front Yard Setback of 20' to Allow Construction of a Portico Over
the Front Door
MOTION: Commissioner Schindler moved, seconded by Churchill, to approve the
consent Agenda. The motion carried 5-0.
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Cobblestone Lake 4th Addition -Consideration of a Replat of Lots 7-14, 16-21,
and 25-31, Block 3, COBBLESTONE LAKE 31LD Addition
City Planner Tom Lovelace presented the request from Rock Creek Homes and
Cobblestone Lake Cottages, LLC, for approval of a subdivision by replat of 21
existing single family residential lots into 18 new single family residential lots.
Lovelace reported the property is zoned Planned Development No. 703, Zone 2,
which allows for single family, two family, and 4-unit townhouse dwelling units.
The applicant intends to construct single-family cottage style homes. Site
plan building permit authorization review is not required for this request. Chair
Edgeton asked if the same product would be used. Lovelace stated that the product
will be the cottage style homes similar to the original proposal with a larger lot.
The current lots range in size from 4,759, sq. ft. to 8,066 sq. ft., with an average lot
width of 44 feet. The proposed replat will eliminate 3 lots, which will range in size
from 5,772 sq. ft. to 8,466 sq. ft. with lot widths averaging 52-53 feet. This increase
will allow the developer to make some design changes to the cottage home product.
Lovelace reported that existing drainage and utility easements will need to be
vacated and new easements established with the replat. If the replat is approved,
some lots will have two utility services. Lovelace stated that the services should be
removed prior to the issuance of a building permit. Commissioner Hadley asked
how this would affect the existing streets. Assistant City Engineer Jacob Fick stated
that the second lift has not been installed on the streets and the City would also be
looking at capping off on the main sewer and water.
Lovelace stated that Dakota County does not normally approve subdivisions with
lots that are not contiguous. Any approval shall be subject to the County's review
and recommendation. The applicant has informed staff that the County has indicated
it would be in favor of the replat.
Scott McMahon, representing the applicants, stated that they are trying to provide a
family product with the yard maintained by an association. The developers are
seeing a trend for larger lots.
Chair Edgeton asked if anyone from the public would like to address the
Commission, and if so, they may do so at this time. No public comments were
taken.
Lovelace stated that it is the policy of the Planning Commission not to act on an item
the same night as its' public hearing. Since there were no issues brought forth by the
Commission or the public, staff is recommending approval of the proposal with the
conditions outlined in staff's report.
MOTION: Commissioner Churchill moved, seconded by Hadley, to recommend
approval of the replat of Lots 7-14, 16-21, and 25-31, Block 3, Cobblestone Lake 3ra
Addition, subject to the following conditions:
• Approval of the subdivision by Dakota County.
• The vacation of the existing perimeter easements and establishment of
new perimeter easements over the new lots.
• Removal of all unnecessary private utility services prior to issuance of
building permits for Lot 4, Block 1; Lot 2, Block 2; and Lot 5, Block
The motion carried 5-0.
6. LAND USE/ACTION ITEMS
A. Pool Ordinance Amendment -Consideration of an Amendment to the Zoning
Code that Addresses Requirements for Swimming Pools and Landscape Ponds
Associate City Planner Kathy Bodmer presented the request for an amendment to the
City's swimming pool ordinance. On May 19th, the Planning Commission held a
public hearing, at which time they requested the proposed new pool regulations and
proposed new landscape pond regulations be prepared as separate ordinances for
review and adoption. Staff developed separate ordinances based on the comments
received from the Planning Commission.
Bodmer reviewed the key amendments to the pool ordinance, which were outlined in
the staff report to the Commission. Staff is recommending approval of the ordinance
as amended.
Chair Edgeton stated that the area requirements should be taken out of the ordinance
and that depth should be the only criteria in regards to the structure meeting the
definition of a pool. Commissioner Duff asked if there would be a grandfather
clause for existing pools and what, if any, is the City's liability. Bodmer responded
that there would not be a grandfather clause. City Attorney Sharon Hills stated there
would be no liability to the City.
Comrissioner Schindler asked if hot tubs and spas are included in the ordinance.
Bodmer stated that any body of water meeting the criteria would be included. The
Commission recommended that the title of the ordinance include hot tubs and spas.
Commissioner Churchill asked if setbacks are an issue in regards to the pools placed
on a utility line. Bodmer stated that pools are allowed only in the rear of the yazd
and that utilities are normally on the side of a yard. Assistant City Engineer Jacob
Fick stated that if a pool had to be removed for utilities, the financial responsibility
would lie on the homeowner.
MOTION: Commissioner Duff moved, seconded by Schindler, to recommend
approval of the ordinance regulating swirmniug pools with the following conditions:
• Title Change as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA, AMENDING SECTION 155 OF
THE CITY CODE REGULATING SWIMMING POOLS, HOT
TUBS, AND SPAS
• Under the section titled SWIMMING POOL. The second sentence
should read: Any structure which is intended for swimming wading,
or recreational bathing and contains, or is capable of containing, water
over 24 inches deep.
• Under the section titled (A) BARRIER REQUIlZEMENTS, the
paragraph should read as follows: 1. A minimum forty-ei t inch
{48") high restricting access, barrier which completely surrounds and
restricts access to the swimming pool, shall be installed and
maintained in a sound and safe condition around a swimming_pool or
around the tract of land where the pool is located. The bamer may
consist of a security fence, freestanding wall, a buildin¢'s wall, or
combination thereof. Spas or hot tubs with a lockine safety cover
which complies with ASTM Standard F 1346-91 shall be exempt
from these barrier requirements.
The motion carried 4-1.
Regarding landscape ponds, staff concluded that landscape ponds are intended to be
part of a landscaped area and are typically not designed for swimming. Most cities
do not regulate landscape ponds at all or regulate them in the same manner as they
regulate pools. As a result, staff is recommending that the Planning Commission not
take any action on the Landscape Pond Ordinance at this time. Commissioner
Churchill stated that she would like to see the ordinance amended in regards to
setbacks. The Commission also requested the title of the ordinance include the
words "water features" and that staff find a section of the City's code that this
ordinance might appropriately fit into.
This item will be brought back to the Commission for further discussion.
7. OTHER BUSINESS
None
8. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Commissioner Hadley moved, seconded by Churchill, to adjourn the meeting at
8:35 p.m.