HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/12/2007 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
City of Apple Valley
Dakota County, Minnesota
• September 12, 2007
Minutes of the special meeting of the Economic Development Authority of Apple Valley, Dakota
County, Minnesota, held September 12, 2007, at 6:30 o'clock p.m., at the Apple Valley
Municipal Center.
PRESENT: President Severson; Commissioners Erickson, Goodwin, Grendahl, and Hamann -
Roland.
ABSENT: Commissioner Bergman.
Staff members present were: Executive Director Lawell, Secretary Gackstetter, City Attorney
Dougherty, Finance Director Ballenger, Assistant City Administrator Grawe, Public Works
Director Heuer, Parks and Recreation Director Johnson, Police Chief Johnson, Community
Development Director Nordquist, Police Captain Rechtzigel, Human Resources Manager
Strauss, and Fire Chief Wassmund.
President Severson called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
• MOTION: of Erickson, seconded by Grendahl, approving the agenda for today's meeting as
presented. Ayes - 5, Nays - 0.
MINUTES
MOTION: of Hamann- Roland, seconded by Goodwin, approving the minutes of the special
meeting of October 12, 2006, as written. Ayes - 5, Nays - 0.
APPOINTMENT OF OFFICERS
MOTION: of Hamann- Roland, seconded by Grendahl, adopting Resolution No. EDA -07 -1
appointing 2007 officers of the Economic Development Authority as: President -
Severson, Vice - President - Goodwin, Secretary - Gackstetter, Treasurer -
Erickson, and Assistant Treasurer - Gackstetter. Ayes - 5, Nays - 0.
SCHOOL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES WIND TURBINE /COMMUNICATIONS TOWER
Mr. Lawell reviewed details on the original construction and bonding of the School of
Environmental Studies (SES) and the proposed construction of the windmill and
communications tower. Due to the Economic Development Authority's (EDA) involvement in
the SES project, legal counsel suggested the EDA acknowledge the additional construction
• proposed on the site related.to the windmill and communications tower and confirm that such
construction will have no adverse impact on the bonds previously issued. Briggs and Morgan,
the EDA's Bond Counsel, provided a letter stating the proposed construction relating to the
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
City of Apple Valley
Dakota County, Minnesota
September 12, 2007 •
Page 2
windmill and communications tower will not adversely impact the tax - exempt status of interest
on the bonds. The zoo, the school district, and Dakota Electric have entered into a Construction
Agreement, a Tower Lease Agreement, and a Utility Easement. The EDA is not party to the
agreements, but is being asked to consent to the agreements.
MOTION: of Hamann- Roland, seconded by Grendahl, adopting Resolution No. EDA - 07 - •
consenting to the Construction Agreement, Easement Agreement, and Tower
Lease Agreement related to the School for Environmental Studies windmill and
communications tower. Ayes - 5 - Nays - 0.
APPLE VALLEY TRANSIT STATION
Commissioner Grendahl distributed a copy of an article about transit from the Sun Newspaper. It
•
quotes the Mayor and a Councilmember from the City of Lakeville. Councilmember Grendahl
commented about the article and suggested setting a date to further discuss permit parking at the
Apple Valley Transit Station.
Mr. Lawell said the Economic Development Authority (EDA) is the landowner of the Apple
Valley Transit Station. If the EDA wants to, it can proceed with permit parking. He added that
the Minnesota Valley Transit Authority is currently working with Watson's on the potential
acquisition of their site.
Commissioner Hamann -Roland said she had scheduled a meeting with Peter Bell and the
Governor to discuss Transit Taxing District boundaries and additional funding for extra bus
routes. However, the meeting was canceled due to the bridge collapse.
Commissioner Grendahl stated it does not matter what happens with Watson's, Lakeville and
Farmington still need to join the transit taxing district.
Commissioner Erickson said everyone would like a multi -level parking deck, but there is a cost
factor involved.
Commissioner Goodwin questioned the comment in the newspaper article in which the Lakeville
Councilmember states the City of Lakeville paid for a freeway interchange. He asked how they
figure that. -
Mr. Lawell explained that Lakeville paid for the project through bonds, which were later
reimbursed by the Minnesota Department of Transportation.
Commissioner Goodwin responded that up fronting a project through bonding, which was fully
expected to be reimbursed and was reimbursed, can hardly be called a project paid for by the City
of Lakeville. He asked how much the City of Apple Valley pays into the Transit Taxing District.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
City of Apple Valley
Dakota County, Minnesota
September 12, 2007
Page 3
Mr. Ballenger said the Metropolitan Council's debt portion of the levy last year was between
$500,000 and $600,000. He estimates it will be a similar amount the next few years.
Mr. Lawell added that the City no longer levies for the Transit Taxing District, since it is now
done by the Metropolitan Council.
Commissioner Grendahl said she thought Apple Valley households paid approximately $40 a
year in taxes for the Transit Taxing District.
Commissioner Goodwin said people south of 160th Street receive the same benefit as the people
north of 160th Street without paying into the Transit Taxing District. The legislators could fix
this if they wanted to. He further said if the Minnesota Valley Transit Authority takes Watson's,
Apple Valley looses that tax base.
Commissioner Hamann -Roland suggested rescheduling the meeting with Peter Bell and the
Governor before the next Economic Development Authority meeting.
Commissioner Grendahl said she would prefer setting an Economic Development Authority
meeting on October 25 just to keep things moving. If necessary, the meeting can be canceled.
Mr. Lawell said it may be necessary to schedule an informal meeting of the City Council on
October 25, 2007, as well, in order to discuss the Cedar Avenue Corridor improvements.
MOTION: of Grendahl, seconded by Goodwin, to adjourn. Ayes - 5, Nays - 0.
The meeting was adjourned at 6:50 o'clock p.m.
•