The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About06/05/2017 10 V i 06 000 see Meeting Location: Municipal Center City of Apple 7100 147th Street West Valley Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124 TELECOMMUNICATIONS ADVISORY COMMITTEE REGULAR MEETING AGENDA JUNE 5, 2017 - 7:00 P.M. Meeting Canceled• NEXT REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING: Monday September 11, 2017 7:00 p.m. (Regular) 10 V i 06 000 see Meeting Location: Municipal Center City of Apple 7100 147th Street West Valley Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124 TELECOMMUNICATIONS ADVISORY COMMITTEE REGULAR MEETING TENTATIVE AGENDA JUNE 5, 2017 - 7:00 P.M. 1. Call to Order 2. Approval of Agenda 3. Audience - 10 Minutes Total Time Limit - For Items NOT on this Agenda 4. Approval of Minutes of March 6, 2017 Regular Meeting 5. Regular Agenda Items: A. 2nd Quarter Complaint Log B. 2nd Quarter Activities Report C. Dakota County Broadband Initiative D. Charter Franchise Update 6. Informational Items A. FCC Rulemaking and Other Franchise Issues B. E-Commerce and Business Development Issues C. Other Staff and Committee Updates 7. Adjourn NEXT REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING: Monday September 11, 2017 7:00 p.m. (Regular) Telecommunications Advisory Committee City of Apple Valley March 6, 2017 7:00 P.M. Municipal Center Minutes 1. Call to Order Secretary Brown called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Rollin Bible, Jerry Brown, David Cherner, Mark Moore, Dale Rodell Members Absent: Others Present: Charles Grawe, Tim Klausler 2. Approval of A eg nda MOTION: Mr. Bible moved, second by Mr. Rodell, to approve the agenda with the addition of the 2016 Accomplishments report. Motion passed 5 —0. 3. Audience Items There were no audience items. 4. Approval of Minutes of September 12, 2016 Regular Meeting MOTION: Mr. Rodell moved, second by Mr. Brown, to approve the minutes of September 12, 2016 as presented. Motion passed 2—0 (Mr. Bible, Mr. Cherner, and Mr. Moore abstained). 5A. Introduction of New Members David Cherner and Mark Moore Introductions were made. 5B. Election of Officers Mr. Brown nominated Mr. Bible. Mr. Bible declined the nomination. MOTION: Mr. Bible moved, second by Mr. Rodell, to elect Mr. Brown as chair. Motion passed 5—0. MOTION: Mr. Bible moved, second by Mr. Brown, to elect Mr. Moore as secretary. Motion passed 5—0. 5C. Introduction of New Cable Coordinator Tim Klausler Mr. Klausler introduced himself. 5D. Is`Quarter Complaint Log Mr. Grawe reported that the City received two complaints during the period. 5E. 3rd Quarter Activities Report Mr. Grawe provided a brief update on activities. 5F. Charter Franchise Update Mr. Grawe said he anticipated that the Charter renewal will begin to move forward,but noted changes to the negotiating team for Charter. 5G. Approve Meeting Calendar MOTION: Mr. Moore moved, second by Mr. Bible, to set a meeting schedule of March 6, 2017; June 5, 2017; September 11, 2017; and December 4, 2017. Motion passed 5— 0. 5H. Approve 2016 Accomplishments MOTION: Mr. Moore moved, second by Mr. Bible, to approve the report on 2016 Accomplishments. Motion passed 5 —0. 6A. FCC Rulemaking and Other Franchise Issues Mr. Grawe reported no new issues. 6B. E-Commerce and Business Development Issues Mr. Grawe reported no new e-commerce issues. 6C. Other Staff and Committee Updates There were no other items. 7. Adjourn MOTION: Mr. Bible moved, second by Mr. Rodell, to adjourn the meeting. Motion passed 5 - 0. The meeting was adjourned at 7:35 p.m. Dakota County Broadband Presentation to Apple Valley Telecom m u nications Committee �r o Y, n v . Y o r rr1 i i i IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 01 � /!///'//', ' - IJIIJIJI1 i, The Proposal that is Being Advanced in Dakota County • Building an enhanced / consolidated network to make government operations more efficient, using existing publicly owned fiber assets supplemented in a few areas as necessary — The "I-Net" • Supplementing the I-Net to create an enhanced network — making excess system capacity available for commerce — The "C-Net" • Implementing a JPA governance model for both the I-Net and the C- Net — Dakota County and Cities Governments would govern • Implementing a wholesale, open access, multi-service business C- Net model - government does not offer any direct retail business or residential services • The goal is to make it more possible for more network and Internet Service Providers (ISP's) to come into the market. • Working together a "Systems Plan" spelling out how these goals can be met has been prepared. 2 PiggLa=f a UE ocw~ WNW Modern Broadband Networka Nbd at*01uo cru Nrw Fiber and Wireless ry (ojenetm r MORS Cain us ntmjpk �� umiueG � WWI of Imewto III C3911 Ammer ftqhWhoodl (AMMIS19411vt""Mtn vu ua Dakota County I = Net Schematic "'" h" Men dotaHeights�t , °" West St. Paul Eagan zi � e 5 South St Paul imom000 a ami Apple Valley "r Eagan Databank tlata Center M SP2 Northern Service 0entdara�a 1�j m�"umMo MMgUOqp��ll� �wmUo M��pp rp�� d by M �imu1� �'^6fJMr VV 1(v Dakota County e Western Service Cent O Technic Cole e r g Inver Grove Heights � Burnsville M1i m� p 4%N", Lakeville Dakota County ��"r Administra lve Building Farmington Rosemount .......................W RING FIBER ACCESS NODE- PRIMARY ROUTE ACCESS NODE - ALTERNATE ROUTE � Hastings Dakota Conanly Fiber � sl u r,An tl i. Route Status-r INet� HA a i l r app ,a m �'eraa 4,rureeun...I'Gufb +.iax lfAl A �'i,,, ^'warn� ^,atur-i,lusPa.wrw I'�arrctBrr�ma 1,No HM Slaw, I�:;w a urrfu wrnwd to w� . ;r sn. aaa� rd'e7 YR.arcrl p,rouaNau , 01) ve va �9,am a0m 1 qy Vlog I tG �� u 1R��f t un�G f Bpp ki.ir �dl 1 di.rglff iae,klnifl , 1,7aubralatlp w ar r w.d.r,•rir^�r^rc+u C'e^avM1cvw Tm ki.nu¢:Arll offs.„T• ao� WF y^�+p�^-�„��NINE=DESIGN 7'�d�l^4E b W',e a��,,;,r �, a fi,x rl v vrcwA^ Ivn�rrN.xv�vx pit �a C a 01nkq G " Dakota County C= Net Schematic RING FIBER ........................... ACCESS NODE-PRIMARY ROUTE Q ® + Mendota Heights West St. Paul4 ACCESS NODE-ALTERNATE ROUTE Apple Valley cabinet cabinet South Si. Paul cabinet + cabinet p Service Provider B f � Service, � PraviderG . ," � � �� r r ,,�� Service Prodder C ,i.; Provider D Eagan�a 'ank �� Wes ern rvioe Data Center MSP2 Center 01 r , InverGrove Heights Burnsville cabinet cabinet Lakeville Dak ata Cau n ty Adm in is Vali w Bu it d ng Hastings cabinet Rosemount cabinet Farmington cabinet cabinet ��t'CQtr�'C.�bx��l Fiber rl a ...... ..,w__ _...m..._..._. w u "4rh��w� � A ys V+unrl Ckfv ounty Foote Status:C"-T�wel �,� � „g tai � x d a wJuw �w�w I,arsa:•C;1s nR�na m:•¢9 h'"n,ronoawu '� H � Nr..rntrra�rzei fs,msa•, s� www�w wwwwuw „waw.www JOJOJOJOJ ;borC;:ic^sr I4 il— �s ............... l P p 'lacl.vmo L P VM eN ganmasd d V Y”./Nt r f O�Y 1Y4 ,,.www V f s A tuNE.n.k'M1axnl�lMt.a f 4 �, rwwmwwl w��wm wu � w.ww,ww wN�w:��`w�,wwuwwww, r w. = - w bd pM w r tlw� po�� m�ww H _ Vlw m i° H d IIr rf �m r � r i 0 f r q H Y u�,wwwwwwww � wwwwm�www«„�ww 0 � C In ws„ l j f p 'I��j"' w.{ w» owe , r' 4 1.�rvgwltln G hx,oxnz'runmi II �,, w,H oiouy l j4vl'w� � - i �w.Mww w�mw��wrww�uommm �„�„wa�W� � �� ,w,wri w:w000��ww..,,wwwww�w.wa..ww wwwzww 'r tl�R9tly 24)1!^.. II l ��w ' 9�wkuxYa(:u,ara Yo ly EAIrTt&,Ah,,c wulto we'sterrslp rMr�u�ll � � t �7 DESIGN NINE k � r t .. „„ .. .:� t~ir fm rsncmm I re tw�+'m•rm ��, � I � li4 w•w I .. r A Cu s ��tlile+w Initial Costs One-time capital costs for the I-Net will be shared as follows: • City members pay the cost of their switches, optics and costs relating to furnishing an appropriate location for the equipment • City members pay their proportionate share of splicing and other construction related costs • City Members pay for any member needed lateral fiber optic cable up to 2,000 feet • Dakota County pays for lateral fiber optic cable installations of longer than 2,000 feet • Dakota County pays costs related to the core nodes It is proposed that the needed one-time capital costs for the C- Net would be funded by the Dakota County Community Development Agency. The Agency has agreed to consider this but no final approval has of yet been made. Annual Operating Costs Operational Costs will be shared as follows: • Operational costs shared based on a series of distribution parameters. The general rule for the parameters is that members who own larger portions of the infrastructure will bear a proportionately larger share of the operational costs. • Assets are being inventoried to provide a basis for this sharing. More inventory work remains. • Members will be adding to the system as time passes increasing their share of the total assets managed by the consortium . Thus, it is envisioned that the cost sharing proportions will be updated each year. 9 Revenues Revenue will be shared based on three concepts • 45% would go to individual city members who sponsor the C-Net implementation within their city limits. • 50% will go to those members who have provided and will be providing the infrastructure necessary to make the I-Net and C-Net functional. This will in turn be shared based on the portion of the infrastructure provided by each member. • 5% will go to a "pool" to be shared by all members in proportion to their population. (By the time the I-Net and C-Net are mobilized all members will be providing some portion of the infrastructure. The county-wide nature of the consortium provides a value in and of itself. • Two of the prospective members currently have C-Net capabilities and have borrowed dollars to support portions their investments. These members will retain the "pre-consortium" revenues that they were planning on to retire debt fora period of years — probably five years. • The amount of overall C-Net revenue that may be available and the timing for when that revenue will begin are very difficult to predict. 1. Cost and Revenue Sharing Summary Membeir I- Net "Glap" Project Operational Costs EXAMPLE Reveiniue C-Net "Glaip" Capital Costs Shiaring- 2 Capita[ Costs $ % % $ % % Apple Valley 27,566 1.7% 23,265 4.3% 33,317 8.5% $ 0.,0% Burnsville 112,267 7.,0% 67,540 12.4% 49,205 12.ff% $ 0.0% Daikota, County $1,079,544 67.,3% $274,300 50.4% $127,665 32.-Plo $ 0.,0% Eagain, $ 25,773 1.6% $104,420 19.2% $ 72,120 18.5%b $ 0.0% Formingtoin, $ 34,941 2.,2% $ 7,050 1.3% $ 11,792 3.04 $ 0.,0% Hastings $ 25,773 1.6% $ 14,815 2.7% $ 15,525 4.0% $ 0.,0% I inive r Girove He i'ghits $ 93,682 5.,8% $ 8,420 1.5% $ 12,121 3.1% $ 0.,0% Laikevi'l I e $ 25,773 1.6% $ 11,539 2.1% $ 23,938 6.1% $ 0.,0% Me ri,dlota, Heights $ 93,682 5.,8% $ 6,753 1.2% $ 11,535 3.0% $ 0.,0% R ose mou riit $ 30,290 1.9% $ 7,424 1.4% $ 11,812 3.0% $ 0.,0% South, St. Paul $ 28,150 1.8% $ 8,213 1.5% $ 10,103 2.6% $ 0.,0% West St. Paul $ 25,773 1.6% $ 10,061 1.9% $ 10,867 2.8% $ 0.,0% Daikota, County CDA-1 $ - 0.,0% $ - 0.0% $ - 0.0% $339,178 100.,0% Total $1,603,214 100.,0% $543,800 100.0% $390,0100 100.0%1 $339,178 100.,0% Benefits • A more robust — redundant planned system would be available for all members. Service would be more resilient and reliable • Operations would be streamlined - One stop management and tracking of fiber assets is possible — a single point of contact - Sharing fiber is quicker and easier because of pre-defined "rules of the road" - Specialized expertise will be provided that does not presently exist • Costs would be reduced - Economies of scale on purchased goods and services - Joint utilization of specialized expertise — sharing the costs - Redundant management costs are eliminated 1. Benefits of C= Net • Existing investments by County and cities will be leveraged to enhance economic development • Incumbent and new Internet Service Providers (ISP"s) will be more able to meet customer needs • The presence of additional more-empowered ISP's will increase competition and reduce cost to new and existing businesses • County governments will have a new and powerful business recruitment tool • Additional network investment by private sector more likely 13 fa fa Questions Discussion `rHi� "N r � tu�p n�97r � d i