HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/05/1994CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
January 5, 1994
1. CALL TO ORDER
The City of Apple Valley Planning Commission Meeting of January 5, 1994, was
called to order at 7:35 p.m. by Chairman Alan Felkner in the Council Chambers of the
Apple Valley City Hall.
Members Present: Chairman Alan Felkner, Marcia Gowling, Frank Blundetto, and
Karen Edgeton.
Members Absent: Jeannine Churchill and Len Miller.
Staff Present: Keith Gordon, City Engineer; John Gretz, Community
Development Director; Mike Dougherty, City Attorney; Rick
Kelley, City Planner; Scott Hickok, Associate Planner.
Others Present: See the sign -in sheet.
2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
The agenda was approved as submitted.
MOTION: Member Gowling moved, seconded by Member Blundetto.
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF DECEMBER 15, 1993
The minutes were approved as submitted.
MOTION: Member Gowling moved, seconded by Member Blundetto.
4. CONSENT AGENDA
- None -
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Diamond Path Townhome Rezoning, Preliminary Plat and Site Plan Review
for 46 Multiple Residential Dwelling Units at the Southwest Corner of Pilot Knob Road &
Diamond Path
Associate Planner Scott Hickok presented a brief introduction to the Diamond Path
Townhouse proposal. Hickok stated that the proposal has been met with a series of
discussions between the Developer and the City, and recent discussions with the Department
of Natural Resources. These discussions have revealed that additional time will be needed
Planning Commission Minutes
January 5, 1994
Page 2
for the layout of the development. The developers have asked for time to rework some of
the development layout issues. Staff recommended that the Planning Commission open the
hearing and continue the hearing at the Developer's request until a future meeting.
Chairman Alan Felkner opened the public hearing and asked for public comment.
Charles Bergquist, 12851 Eastview Curve, asked for clarification of when this item
would be on the agenda again. Chairman Felkner stated that the Developer has asked for
some time, and it will be at a future meeting to be determined by the resubmittal of the
materials that the Developers are working on at this time. Planner Hickok gave his business
card to Mr. Bergquist, and Chairman Felkner asked him to keep in touch with the Planning
Staff to find out when the item will appear on the agenda. Planner Hickok also took
Burquist's telephone number for continued correspondence.
There were no further public comments to this issue, and the Chairman reiterated
that the hearing would be held open.
5B. Cedar Isle Estates Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, and
Preliminary Plat for 259 Single Family Houses and 120 Multiple Residential Dwelling Units
at the Southeast Corner of Galaxie Avenue and 140th Street
City Planner Rick Kelley introduced the proposal and stated that the request is to
amend the Comprehensive Plan from Limited Industry, General Industry and High Density
Residential, to Single Family Fesidential and Low Density Residential. Kelley continued
by stating that the proposal also includes a request to rezone the land from Agriculture and
I2, General Industry, to R3 and M3 -A, B or C, as well as a preliminary plat for 259 single
family lots and 120 townhouse units.
Planner Kelley described the layout of the development, including the street
connections and single family development layouts in the description. Kelley also explained
that the development request asks for some 50 foot right -of -ways as opposed to a standard
60 foot right -of -way for a development of this type. The purpose for the 50 foot right -of -way
request is that the developer feels that the lot orientation and depth of lots can be increased
along the periphery to enhance and protect those lots from the surrounding land uses and
also make the rear grades on those lots less severe. Kelley continued by stating that one
intersection had been proposed which would match that access point with existing 142nd
Street West. Kelley explained that Staff felt that this street should be moved south to line
up with 143rd Street Court in order to preclude the need for a 4 -way traffic control -.
A description of the central ponding and park area was then given. It was explained
to the Commission that the proposed park dedication did not meet the Park Committee's
approval. The Park Committee had requested a consolidation of the park area which would
allow a larger potential ball field or play area with significant street frontage. The pond
area as described in the proposal would have a shallow grade and would be linked with a
pathway north and south. The island itself would have bridges at the north and south end
Planning Commission Minutes
January 5, 1994
Page 3
to provide a trail link. As proposed, this island would be included with the proposed park
land dedicated to the City by the developer.
Marcia Gowling asked Kelley to explain the park in greater detail. Through the use
of overhead transparencies Kelley explained and illustrated the concerns of the Park and
Recreation Advisory Committee. Kelley continued by stating that the trail and sidewalk
policy calls for an 8 foot wide asphalt pathway along both sides of community collector
roadways and a 5 foot wide concrete sidewalk along both sides of neighborhood collector
roadways. The proposed internal street system in this development, however, is laid out so
there are no neighborhood collector streets or identifiable through streets which would serve
as a collector. Therefore, the Staff did not see any internal streets that meet the established
criteria for sidewalk installation, with the exception of the entrance road to 140th Street,
which leads to the proposed park and trail.
Karen Edgeton asked to continue the discussion on the park and island specifically,
and asked if Staff was concerned about the island, either from a maintenance or safety
perspective. Rick explained that the bridge pathway was designed to link the sidewalk at
the northern end of the development to the park area at the southern edge. Edgeton
expressed a concern about the hazard created by the water.
Frank Blundetto asked for clarification on the sidewalk, and stated that he was
concerned that sidewalks were not indicated. Kelley pointed out that the large bituminous
pathways along 140th and Galaxie Avenue were designed to serve this area and allow
pedestrian movement around the development. Kelley went on to explain that the pathways
are required because of the higher volume and mix of traffic on those roadways, and a
pathway has in the past been deemed more appropriate than a sidewalk.
Marcia Gowling asked what amenities are proposed for the park land. Kelley stated
that there are not specific plans for amenities in the park at this time. Gowling then asked
if a ball field would create a need for additional parking, then commented that this park has
been designed to appear as a backyard park, and not as a City park.
Member Edgeton asked if this would indeed be a City park. Kelley responded that
it would.
City Engineer Keith Gordon explained the sewer routing through the property,
starting at the Fischer Centex Development north of 140th and continuing through the
Cedar Isle Development property. Gordon went on to explain the outlet to the pond near
Galaxie, referred to as the Fischer Pond Linville area, and also explained that the pond
level is controlled, although it has the ability to flood through raising and lowering of
approximately 5 feet. Gordon clarified this with the engineer for the developer, who
concurred that the rear areas of these lots would experience periodic water levels up to the
easement line, and the pond level could bounce five feet. Karen Edgeton asked that this
point be made very clear to the future homeowners: that the pond area has the ability to
bounce within those limitations.
Planning Commission Minutes
January 5, 1994
Page 4
Frank Blundetto asked for further clarification on the pond, and asked if it would be
drained when it reached a certain point. Keith Gordon explained.
Alan Felkner asked fora clarification on the narrow street request. Rick Kelley
deferred to Bill Maurer of Probe Engineering, who represents the developer. Mauer
explained the elevation differential between the existing Galaxie Avenue, Public Works
Facility, etc., and stated that with reduced right -of -way dimensions to 50 feet, the rearyard
slope can be minimized, making maintenance and aesthetics more appealing for the
homeowners along the outer edges of the development.
Karen Edgeton asked Bill Maurer whether or not the island is absolutely necessary
in the center of the development. Maurer explained that the island is viewed as an essential
element and that many owners prefer not to have a path along the rear lot lines of their
homes. This island would allow an opportunity for a path to exist without having the path
actually on the lot or adjacent to the lot of the home owner. Maurer also stated that the
slope beneath the surface of the pond itself would be a 10 to 1 slope which is very gradual,
and the pond bottom would be contoured so that there would not be dropoffs. Maurer also
stated that the east /west connection is perceived to be very important by the developer
because it does allow an opportunity for pedestrians to cross the development from east to
west, as well as from north to south. Maurer concluded by saying that the developer has
also proposed extensive landscaping along the peripheral boundaries of the development.
Karen Edgeton asked about the parking issue for the park itself. Mauer responded
by stating that there are two trains of thought on this issue. The Park and Recreation
Advisory Committee would like to see a consolidation of the park land area, allowing for
a much more open feel and the possibility of a ball field or other activity areas. The
developer, on the other hand, would like to see this park developed as an amenity and have
the appearance of more of a private park, an internal amenity to the development. Parking
demands will be different based on the ultimate park design.
Marcia Gowling asked who would maintain the island. John Gretz stated that he
expects that the City would take responsibility for maintenance of the island and may accept
the land as dedication, but not to be included with the dedication requirement for the
development.
Alan Felkner asked how the Park Department feels about maintaining the island.
Bill Maurer stated for clarification that the water surrounding the island is a maximum of
3 feet deep. The island itself is to be planted with more native vegetation: wild flowers,
grasses, etc., and should not require regular mowing and maintenance as you might expect
in other park land areas. Karen Edgeton once again reiterated that it should be made very
clear to the homeowners that back up to the pond that this pond's elevation will rise and
lower, and that the backs of their lots will be affected by these changes in water level.
Scott Johnson of Arcon Development introduced himself and stated that with this
development they hope to create an image that combines amenity and middle bracket
housing for the community. Johnson continued by stating that he feels that the site needs
Planning Commission Minutes
January 5, 1994
Page 5
to be rebuilt, and that a storm pond needs to be enhanced to look like an amenity rather
than a utility. Johnson confirmed that the developer's intentions are not to run the trails
along the rear lot lines of the residential sites in the development. Instead, they prefer to
have the lots run along the center or through the center of the island with the help of a
bridge at the north and south end of that island. Johnson stated that this island design is
modeled after Edinborough, and he feels that they had success in laying out the
development in a manner that would create ambiance. In answer to the question about
maintenance, Johnson reiterated that grasses and wildflowers would be planted bordering
the path and the pond. This would provide for a natural look and beauty to the island and
would once again enhance the amenity. Johnson also discussed the trail system that was
designed to connect north and south, east and west, and he felt that they had a successful
layout that achieves the goals that were set out for that trail system.
Alan Felkner asked whether or not there would be a homeowners association.
Johnson responded that there would be for the multifamily development, and there has been
some discussion about having the homeowners association maintain the park land area and
the land around the trails. The association has expressed an interest in the possibility, and
Johnson stated he would continue to work with them and discuss that issue.
Felkner stated that he had some concern about the alignment of the streets as
recommended by Staff. Scott Johnson responded that he does have an alternate plan that
shows the street lining up as Staff has recommended. Johnson continued by stating that the
other streets in the development were designed to allow the residents of this large
development to feel part of a smaller development. There are four neighborhood pods, as
Bill Maurer pointed out using the overhead display. These pods are designed in a way that
there are small neighborhoods within the large development neighborhood. Johnson felt
this design would be successful and would enhance the feel of the development itself.
Karen Edgeton asked for an explanation of what the landscaped islands are that are
illustrated in the multifamily area. Johnson responded that these are part of the public
street system, but they will be maintained by the homeowners association. They will be
heavily landscaped and will act as an amenity to the multifamily development area.
Frank Blundetto asked for further explanation of the narrowed street dimension. Bill
Maurer explained that the paved portion of the street itself is not narrower. It's that portion
of the right -of -way that exists outside of the curb on either side of the street commonly
referred to as the boulevard.
Marcia Gowling asked what the price range of the townhomes would be. Scott
Johnson explained that these are a very nice country style townhome, priced from $140,000
to $180,000, and the design options include both a two and three bedroom unit. Johnson
further explained that brochures of existing developments will be made available for those
who are interested. Johnson concluded by stating that the townhomes have amenities that
make them very distinct. The builder is very detailed oriented, which will assure them a
very successful and compatible development with the single family units to the north.
Planning Commission Minutes
January 5, 1994
Page 6
Frank Blundetto asked how Arcon can assure that a single family development will
be as carefully designed. Johnson explained that it is Arcon's practice to review each
blueprint for each home prior to the submittal at the Building Inspection Department.
With no further comments or questions, Chair Felkner closed the public hearing.
5C. Valley Oaks Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, Preliminary Plat,
Conditional Use Permit & Site Plan Review for 58 Multiple Residential Dwelling Units at
Pennock Avenue and 128th Street
This item was tabled and will appear on the January 19, 1994, meeting agenda.
6. LAND USE /ACTION ITEMS
A. Rezoning for Business Park Land Use at the Northwest Corner of CR #42
and Pilot Knob Road
Rick Kelley introduced this issue, stating that the proposal is for consideration of
rezoning from Agricultural to Business Park on the northwest corner of CR #42 and
CR #31. The rezoning request has been instituted by the City to facilitate construction of
a new building for Enderes Tools. They currently are leasing space within the City and have
been looking for a site to build a new facility. This area will be the first phase of a business
park development located at CR #42 and Upper 147th. Business Park is a fairly recent
zoning classification which allows a very light industrial business park activity within its
boundary. 'BP" was the outcome of an extensive study done by the surrounding
development area and staff to determine what the best use for this land would be. Kelley
concluded by stating that Staff recommends approval of the rezoning of the described
property from Agricultural to "BP," Business Park Zoning.
Alan Felkner asked if there were any questions from the audience. There being
none, he called for a motion.
MOTION: Member Edgeton moved, seconded by Member Gowling, to rezone the
described property at CR #42 and CR #31 from Agricultural to "BP," Business Park. The
motion carried 3 - 1 ( Blundetto).
This item will appear on the January 13, 1994, City Council agenda.
611. Mistwood Rezoning, Preliminary Plat and Site Plan Review for 216 Multiple
Residential Dwelling Units
This item was tabled until the January 19, 1994, Planning Commission Meeting.
Planning Commission Minutes
January 5, 1994
Page 7
6C. Huntington Ridge Garden Home Development Proposal including Rezoning
& Preliminary Plat for 52 Townhouse /Condominum Dwelling Units and Outlot for 3 Single
Family Lots on the west side of Pilot Knob Road between CR #38 and Dorchester Trail
This item was tabled at the request of the petitioner and will reappear once the
modified plans have been submitted to Staff.
6D. Avsur Acres: Rezoning and Preliminary Plat for 6 Single Family Lots between
Cedar Avenue and Pennock Avenue, north of 133rd Street
This item was tabled at the request of the petitioner and will reappear upon
submission of revised plans.
6E. Utility Corridor and Substation at CR #38 and 130th Street by Germane
Avenue
This item was tabled at the request of Dakota Electric and will reappear once
Dakota Electric has prepared and submitted any revisions they feel are necessary to comply
with our consultant study.
7. DISCUSSION ITEMS
- None -
8. OTHER BUSINESS
Mike Dougherty of the City Attorney's office gave a brief presentation on the issue
of variances. Dougherty's presentation was based on a memo he had prepared for the
Planning Commission which outlines the variance enabling legislation, and gives direction
to both Staff and the Commission on their recommendation of approval or denial of
variance requests. Dougherty concluded by stating that the attorney's office is working with
the Community Development Staff on an issue in an area of the City where an ordinance
amendment may be the solution, as opposed to what we perceive as numerous variances
based on the original design and layout of the developments in this area of the City.
Karen Edgeton asked about the hardship as it relates to the land. Mike Dougherty
used the Rowell case he had sited in his memo to explain hardship of land and to clarify
that it is not only a hardship of land, but a circumstance unique to a site as well.
Alan Felkner asked for a definition or clarification of what a physical hardship is.
Mike Dougherty explained.
Frank Blundetto stated that in the past there have been situations where a physical
characteristic of the petitioner has been discussed, not a physical hardship of land, but a
physical handicap that has caused the petitioner to need or want certain latitude from the
zoning standards. Mike Dougherty explained that these variance applications are to be
Planning Commission Minutes
January 5, 1994
Page 8
reviewed, and the decision for or against is to be clearly articulated. The Commission may
feel that there is a hardship, and as long as they clearly articulate the supporting elements
of an approval or a denial of a request, then they are doing their job.
Karen Edgeton stated that oftentimes when there is a Staff recommendation for
denial, it is very difficult for the Commission to argue with that recommendation of denial
when it seems that it is so contrary to what law will allow. A general discussion regarding
variances ensued.
9. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 8:20 p.m.