HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/06/2017Apple
��ey
Meeting Location: Municipal Center
7100 147th Street West
Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124
September 6, 2017
PLANNING COMMISSION TENTATIVE AGENDA
7:00 PM
1. Call to Order
2. Approve Agenda
3. Approve Consent Agenda Items
Consent Agenda Items are considered routine and will be enacted with a
single motion, without discussion, unless a commissioner or citizen requests
to have any item separately considered. It will then be moved to the land
use/action items for consideration.
A. Approve Minutes of August 16, 2017, Regular Meeting
4. Public Hearings
5. Land Use / Action Items
A. Kudrle Front Yard Setback Variance - PC 17-27-V
Consider a 5' Setback Variance for a Porch
Location: 15726 Hemlock Ct
Petitioner: Iron River Construction
B. Cedar Park Elementary Improvements - PC 17-30-B
Consideration of Site Plan/Building Permit Authorization for 9,880 sq. ft.
Building Additions and New Bus Drop-off/Pick-up Lot.
Location: 7500 Whitney Drive (Southwest Corner of Cedar Ave and
Whitney Dr.)
Petitioner: Independent School District 196
6. Other Business
A. Communities for a Lifetime - Presentation of Dakota County's
Communities for a Lifetime Program and Apple Valley's Communities for
a Lifetime Profile
B. Review of Upcoming Schedule and Other Updates
Next Planning Commission Meeting -Wednesday, September 20, 2017 -
7:00 p.m.
Next City Council Meeting -Thursday, September 14, 2017 - 7:00 p.m.
7. Adjourn
Regular meetings are broadcast, live, on Charter Communications Cable Channel
180 and on the City's website at www.cityofapplevalley.org
Apple„
ITEM:
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE:
SECTION:
3.A.
September6, 2017
Consent Agenda
Description:
Approve Minutes of August 16, 2017, Regular Meeting
Staff Contact:
Joan Murphy, Department Assistant
ACTION REQUESTED:
Approve minutes of regular meeting of August 16, 2017.
Department / Division:
Community Development Department
SUMMARY:
The minutes of the last regular Planning Commission meeting are attached for your review
and approval.
BACKGROUND:
State statute requires the creation and preservation of meeting minutes which document the
official actions and proceedings of public governing bodies.
BUDGET IMPACT:
N/A
ATTACHMENTS:
Minutes
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
AUGUST 16, 2017
1. CALL TO ORDER
The City of Apple Valley Planning Commission meeting was called to order by Chair Melander at
7:00 p.m.
Members Present: Tom Melander, Ken Alwin, Tim Burke, Jodi Kurtz and Paul Scanlan
Members Absent: Keith Diekmann and David Schindler
Staff Present: City Attorney Sharon Hills, Community Development Director Bruce Nordquist,
City Engineer Brandon Anderson, Planner Kathy Bodmer, Planner/Economic
Development Specialist Alex Sharpe and Department Assistant Joan Murphy.
2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Chair Melander asked if there were any changes to the agenda. Hearing none he called for a
motion.
MOTION: Commissioner Burke moved, seconded by Commissioner Scanlan, approving the
agenda. Ayes - 5 - Nays - 0.
3. CONSENT ITEMS
MOTION: Commissioner Alwin moved, seconded by Commissioner Scanlan, approving the
minutes of the meeting of July 19, 2017. Ayes - 4 - Nays - 0. Abstained — 1 (Burke)
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Pasha Driveway Interim Use Permit for a Secondary Access - PC 17-23-I
Chair Melander opened the public hearing at 7:02 p.m.
Planner/Economic Development Specialist Alex Sharpe stated the request is for an interim use
permit for a second driveway not leading to a garage at 13199 Galleria Place. The purpose of the
driveway is to provide direct access to the basement level of the home for an impaired family
member.
The applicant is doing so to allow a family member to continue to reside in the residence after
suffering a debilitating stroke which left him unable to walk or traverse stairways. The driveway
will allow access to the basement level of the home, which includes a full bathroom, and is being
converted to meet the necessary needs.
The applicants have agreed to all the conditions listed, and seek to install this driveway as early as
possible. The total driveway length would be approximately 42 feet long to the property line, 55
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
Dakota County, Minnesota
Planning Commission Minutes
August 16, 2017
Page 2 of 6
feet long to the street, and 12 feet wide. Staff worked with the applicant to shift the driveway to
provide distance and protection from the load bearing beam of the 4 season porch, and the home's
air conditioner.
City staff and the City Attorney determined the best process for this temporary driveway was an
Interim Use Permit, rather than a variance. The primary reason for this is due to the nature of the
variance being unique to the property. A secondary reason is due to the fact that variances cannot be
temporary in nature, whereas an Interim Use Permit often carries a time -frame associated with the
use.
Commissioner Alwin inquired if the driveway was bituminous or concrete.
Mr. Sharpe answered it is proposed to be a concrete driveway and that gravel driveways are not
permitted.
Commissioner Scanlan asked what mechanism was in place to trigger the 5 years mark as far as
renewal would go.
Mr. Sharpe said the applicant would need to approach the City because an IUP has an ending date and
would become invalid. At that time the City would check to see if the driveway was being removed
or not. The City would allow for them to renew at that time. There are very few permits in the City
and the few that there are, staff is able to check on and set a trigger.
Commissioner Scanlan asked if in the event of the house being sold that by filing something with
Dakota County that a notation be recorded there so the buyer recognizes that the driveway would need
to be removed prior to a sale. He inquired if something like that needs to be done.
Attorney Sharon Hills commented that the City has the ability but an interim use permit does not run
with the land. It is to this applicant and in the event of sale, a title company would check with the
City if there are outstanding issues.
Commissioner Kurtz inquired if the neighbors had been notified and if they were, what was their
feedback.
Mr. Sharpe replied that residents within 350 feet of the subject property had been notified by letter
and as of this date he had not received any notification of concerns.
Mrs. Pasha said she seeks access as soon as possible to transport her husband to therapy and doctor
appointments.
Neighbor to the north commented he would like this approved for where the driveway is shown.
Chair Melander closed the public hearing at 7:12 p.m.
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
Dakota County, Minnesota
Planning Commission Minutes
August 16, 2017
Page 3 of 6
MOTION: Commissioner Alwin moved, seconded by Commissioner Burke, recommending
approval of an interim use permit (IUP) for a second driveway not leading to a
garage at 13199 Galleria Place with the following conditions:
1. Vehicles shall not be stored, or parked on the driveway. The driveway shall only
be utilized as a loading/unloading zone.
2. The driveway shall be temporary, and shall be removed prior to the sale of the
home by the Pasha family or within 5 years of the date of approval if a renewal is
not sought.
3. The driveway shall be constructed in a way that is generally consistent with the
site plan dated August 10, 2017.
Ayes - 5 -Nays-0
5. LAND USE/ACTION ITEMS
A. Ryan Real Estate Redevelopment - PC17-09-ZCB
1. Zoning Amendments to PD -290, to Allow Drive-thru Lane in Connection with a Class I
Restaurant, Reduced Building and Parking Setbacks, Increased Building Height, Signs
Painted on Building, and Sign Above Building Roofline
2. Conditional Use Permit for Drive-Thru Facility
3. Site Plan Review/Building Permit Authorization to Construct a 9,000 sq. ft. Restaurant
Location: 14750 Cedar Ave (Southeast corner Cedar Ave & 147th St)
Petitioner: Launch Properties and Ryan Real Estate
Planner Kathy Bodmer stated Launch Properties and Ryan Real Estate request consideration of an
application for the redevelopment of the Ryan Real Estate building at 14750 Cedar Ave (Lot 1,
Block 2 Apple Valley Commercial Addition). The proposed development would demolish the
existing multiple -tenant office building and replace it with a 9,000 sq. ft. Class I Casual restaurant
with two drive-thru lanes.
She reviewed the site plan, zoning amendments requested, easements and setbacks, building design
and dumpster placement as well as traffic impacts on area intersections. She reviewed the public
hearing comments.
City Engineer Brandon Anderson addressed the traffic study and concerns related to a roundabout.
Ms. Bodmer summarized issues and stated that the City was informed today about another piece to
the operation of a temporary outdoor cooler being added to the site plan. She said there are a
number of unresolved issues and requested no formal action be taken tonight.
Chair Melander inquired what this cooler is for.
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
Dakota County, Minnesota
Planning Commission Minutes
August 16, 2017
Page 4 of 6
Ms. Bodmer answered it is an 8 ft. x 20 ft. x 8 ft. tall box that is refrigerated and provides additional
storage for cold goods. The coolers are used at other restaurant locations and provide for mail
orders.
Commissioner Alwin asked if the cooler would be consuming parking spaces.
Ms. Bodmer answered no.
Commissioner Alwin asked how the westbound traffic on 147th Street at the Cedar Marketplace
would be impacted.
Mr. Anderson answered that the access into Cedar Marketplace was looked at and the medians
proposed would prohibit access out of it or into it unless a right turn.
Commissioner Scanlan inquired if there had been any feedback from the commercial properties to
the north.
Ms. Bodmer said staff met with the properties owners and that they are not in favor of the traffic
plan proposed.
Commissioner Scanlan asked if there is something that needs to be done on their part like promote
going out the back side of their lot to get over to Glazier to improve flow out of there.
Ms. Bodmer replied she would think that as a business owner they would want to make it
convenient for their patrons. There would not be a requirement but she thinks they would want to
make it easy for their customers.
Commissioner Scanlan asked if there had been any feedback from the Fire Department as far as
getting in and out. He said he had an opportunity to visit the Woodbury location and thought the
parking lot was pretty tight and then was visualizing the same thing here in Apple Valley.
Ms. Bodmer answered that the Fire Department had reviewed it and there had not been any negative
comments from them. Part of the analysis would be a truck turn analysis that was submitted to
engineering and that had been reviewed.
Commissioner Scanlan expressed concern for the narrowing of the sidewalk in front of the outside
eating area.
Ms. Bodmer said the requirement would be a minimum of 5 feet and it would need to be looked at
to confirm.
Will Matzek, Engineer with Kimley-Horn and Associates, said the 5' sidewalk has been addressed
and they made adjustments to the site plan. Related to plantings at the site and along Cedar
Avenue, they will work with staff to have an attractive site. They are working with Dakota County
on the easements and are confident they will find a solution that works for everyone.
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
Dakota County, Minnesota
Planning Commission Minutes
August 16, 2017
Page 5 of 6
Dan Regan, Launch Properties, added they want to accommodate all employees and customers with
available parking. They have the framework for a parking license agreement with Commons I but
that they do not have a signed agreement at this time. It would be contingent with Portillo's
opening up next summer.
Mr. Matzek explained that for the temporary cooler their proposal would be to extend the north wall
on the trash enclosure to screen the cooler from 147th Street and also some additional landscaping.
The cooler would be used during peak times like 30 days for the grand opening timeframe and then
again on a yearly basis during the holidays for a 30 day temporary window. The cooler is portable,
would be delivered to the site and used for their catering purposes during those peak times.
Community Development Director Bruce Nordquist asked for an explanation of how the cooler
would be used. Is it only used for storage or does it have lights and power and actually packing
shipping containers out in the cooler.
Wendy Hunter, Portillo's, answered that the unit is brought in on a truck, plugged in and placed.
The unit is used for storage only. During the holidays they do a lot of shipping of Italian beef that
can be sent right to your home. They do a lot of catering from the unit itself. There is an interior
light. Other than that it is basically a portable cooler.
Commissioner Scanlan asked if they could provide some photos from existing locations where the
cooler is being used to give a better understanding of what that might look like.
Commissioner Kurtz asked if the cooler handles the cold temperatures in Minnesota.
Ms. Hunter answered yes.
Commissioner Kurtz inquired on the landscaping and asked if they had thought about putting a
couple benches between the trees or open areas.
Mr. Matzek replied that they would be open to that if that was the direction staff wanted to go.
They would be willing to come to a solution.
Chair Melander added that there could be landscaping pots rather than the trees.
Commissioner Scanlan identified he did not see any bike racks in the plan.
Ms. Bodmer said that should be added.
Chair Melander commented that artistic on the trash enclosure would be a nice feature.
6. OTHER BUSINESS
A. Review of upcoming schedule and other updates.
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
Dakota County, Minnesota
Planning Commission Minutes
August 16, 2017
Page 6 of 6
Community Development Director Bruce Nordquist stated that the next Planning Commission
meeting would take place Wednesday, September 6, 2017, at 7:00 p.m.
7. ADJOURNMENT
Hearing no further comments from the Planning Staff or Planning Commission, Chair Melander
asked for a motion to adjourn.
MOTION: Commissioner Burke moved, seconded by Commissioner Scanlan to adjourn the
meeting at 8:00 p.m. Ayes - 5 - Nays - 0.
Respectfully Submitted,
/s/ Joan Murphy
Joan Murphy, Planning Department Assistant
Approved by the Apple Valley Planning Commission
on Tom Melander, Chair
Apple„
ITEM: 5.A.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: September 6, 2017
SECTION: Land Use /Action Items
Description:
Kudrle Front Yard Setback Variance - PCI7-27-V
Staff Contact:
Alex Sharpe, Planner and Economic Dev. Spec.
Department / Division:
Community Development Department
Applicant:
Iron River Construction
Applicant Date: 8/21/2017
60 Days: 10/20/2017
Project Number:
PCI7-27-V
120 Days: 12/19/2017
ACTION REQUESTED:
The Planning Commission is asked to review the proposal and provide a recommendation to
the City Council subject to the following conditions;
1. The variance shall be applicable to the property legally identified as Lot 30, Block 3,
Longridge 2nd Addition.
2. If the Building Permit fee is not paid and not issued or within one (1) year of the date of
approval, the variance approval shall lapse.
3. The property owner shall identify and mark the front property line prior to the issuance
of a building permit.
SUMMARY:
Iron River Construction, on behalf of Kyle Kudrle the property owner of 15726 Hemlock Ct.
has requested consideration of a 5' front setback variance to construct a front porch. City
code requires a 30' front setback in the "R-3" (Single Family Residential) zone.
Staff is recommending approval of the variance due to the following practical difficulties.
1. The lot is irregularly shaped, with the curvature of the cul-de-sac being the limiting
factor for the setback.
2. If the front porch were constructed without a roof it would be architecturally
incompatible with the home and the neighborhood.
BACKGROUND:
The Staff reviews variance applications based strictly upon the requirements of the state
statutes and the City Code which require that the applicant establish that there are practical
difficulties present in order for a variance to be granted, and that logical alternatives are not
available.
Definition of "Practical difficulties":
• The applicant proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the
zoning provisions of the code;
• The plight of the applicant is due to circumstances unique to the property not created
by the applicant; and
• The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality.
• Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties.
In order to grant a variance, the City considers the following factors to determine whether the
applicant established that there are practical difficulties in complying with the provision(s) of
this Chapter:
1. Special conditions apply to the structure or land in question that are particular to the
property and do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district or vicinity in
which the land is located;
The property is unique in that a large portion of the front lot line is straight, and then
the curvature of the cul-de-sac causes a reduced setback to the home.
2. The granting of the proposed variance will not be contrary to the intent of this chapter;
The granting of this variance will not be contrary to the intent of this chapter. The
properly owner intends to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted
by the zoning code.
3. The special conditions or circumstances do not result from the actions of the
owner/applicant; and
The conditions of this lot were not created by the property owner and existed prior to
their ownership. No part of the request involves economic considerations and the variance,
fgranted will not alter the essential character of the surrounding neighborhood.
4. The granting of the variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is
necessary to alleviate practical difficulties in complying with the zoning provisions of this
Code; and
The property is an irregular shape that if developed differently would result in a house
setback that is inconsistent with the rest of the neighborhood. A front porch is consistent
with the neighborhood.
5. The variance requested is the minimum variance necessary to alleviate the practical
difficulty.
The variance requested is the minimum necessary to allow construction of a full porch.
Any less would result in a porch that is not covered for a section.
BUDGET IMPACT:
N/A
ATTACHMENTS:
Report
Aerial Photo
Zoning Map
Survey
Plan Set
Applicant Letter
15726 Hemlock Court Front Setback Variance
PROJECT REVIEW
Existing Conditions
Property Location:
15726 Hemlock Court
Legal Description:
Lot 30 Block 3 Longridge 2nd addition
Comprehensive Plan
Designation
"LD" Low Density Residential
Zoning Classification
"R3" Single Family 11,000 sq. ft.
Existing Platting
Platted
Current Land Use
Single Family Dwelling
Size:
11,870 sq. ft. total
Topography:
Flat
Existing Vegetation
Trees, Shrubs, typical residential landscaping
Other Significant
Natural Features
None identified
Adjacent
Properties/Land Uses
NORTH
Single Family
Comprehensive Plan
"LD" Low Density Residential
Zoning/Land Use
"R3" Single Family 11,000 sq. ft.
SOUTH
Single Family
Comprehensive Plan
"LD" Low Density Residential
Zoning/Land Use
"R3" Single Family 11,000 sq. ft.
EAST
Single Family
Comprehensive Plan
"LD" Low Density Residential
Zoning/Land Use
"R3" Single Family 11,000 sq. ft.
WEST
Single Family
Comprehensive Plan
"LD" Low Density Residential
Zoning/Land Use
"R3" Single Family 11,000 sq. ft.
s
s
• For:
U. S. HONE CORPORATION
Tr
-
41
I 3 5 0 0
1
af: 3
1-5726
C. R. W1NDEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
SURvEYORS Tei £45-3646
13e1 ELJSIIS ST., ST. FAO., MINN. 5W8
• (
ll;,91
Scale 1" = 30'
0 Donotes Iron
T
Lot 30, Block 3, Lonc3riclge Second Addition,
Dakota County, flinne ota
WE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE ANC CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF A SURVEY OF THE
OUNDAPIE$ OF THE LAND ABOVE DESCRIBED AND OF THE tOCAT ION CF ALL BUILDINGS, IF ANY,
THEREON, AND ALL VISI5LE. ENCROACHMEN rS, IF ANY, FROM op ON SAID L AND
Octad thodny A, D. 197.
by
W1.NWEr.4 & ASSOCIATES, ir4C,
MtnntiotC1 kcs-,Hltraisors No
rtnk) /6 DX
� PnLI L/:2ta�
3
30'0"
1
Share, Alex
To:
Subject:
To whom it may concern,
Property Address:
15726 Hemlock Court
Apple Valley, MN 55124
Randy Spring; Jennifer Kudrle
RE: Request for Variance
This is a request for 5' variance for a front yard setback from the corner of the deck/porch to the street
curb. The deck will be 6' deep x30' wide on the front of the home with a roof covering it with same
measurements. The deck platform will be 7"-8" above the ground surface. This will be an "open air" porch
with no screen or windows.
The current rules for setback could be met if the structure was decreased to 21wide instead of the requested
30', but this would place the end of the porch in the middle of windows, which would not be "architecturally"
acceptable.
Also another unique circumstance is if the street was a straight through street, there would not be an issue; but
the end corner of the deck/porch is being measured from the cul-de-sac "curvature" of the street. This is
causing a reduced distance compared to the other end of the deckiporch. Plus, the garage front is protruding 3'
past the requested deck/porch project. It is just the far corner that is being questioned.
We, respectfully, hope these "circumstances" can be taken into account and allow this variance to be
granted. Thank you very much.
Randy Spring
Project Manager
1
Apple„
ITEM: 5.B.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: September 6, 2017
SECTION: Land Use /Action Items
Description:
Cedar Park Elementary Improvements - PC17-30-B
Staff Contact:
Kathy Bodmer, Al CP, Planner
Department / Division:
Community Development Department
Applicant:
Independent School District 196
Applicant Date: 8/23/2017
60 Days: 10/21/2017
Project Number:
PCI7-30-B
120 Days: 12/20/2017
ACTION REQUESTED:
Recommend approval of the Site Plan/Building Permit Authorization for 9,880 sq. ft. office
and classroom additions and parking lot improvements at Cedar Park Elementary (7500
Whitney Drive), subject to compliance with all City Codes, and the following conditions:
1. The driveway access shall be moved to the west as recommended by the City Engineer.
2. A sidewalk connection shall be made from the sidewalk on the southwest side of the
building to Cedar Ave.
3. A sidewalk connection shall be provided from the west parking area around the
stormwater retention area to the playfields to the west.
4. The project is subject to review and approval of the final civil plans by the City
Engineer at the time of application of the building permit.
SUMMARY:
ISD 196 requests consideration of Site Plan Review/Building Permit Authorization to
construct two building additions and parking and circulation improvements. The two
additions include a 4 -classroom addition of 6,880 sq. ft. on the west side of the building and
an office/front entrance addition of approximately 3,000 sq. ft. on the east side of the
building. A new bus loop and parking area is proposed to be constructed on the west side of
the building to separate bus circulation from parent pick-up and drop-off activities.
Access to the site will be modified by removing the two existing drive entrances off of
Whitney Drive and placing a single drive access in the middle of where the existing drives
are located today. The City Engineer recommends that the driveway be shifted to the
location of the west existing driveway, because it will remove a decision point and allow for
smoother circulation through the site.
The City does not have a parking requirement for elementary schools. Staff has used a
recommended parking formula that would require one space for every four students and one
space for every three employees. For this project, the total minimum number of parking
spaces required would be 207; 100 spaces are provided on site. The School District states
that the City's parking calculation is very high compared to other communities. In Fort
Worth, TX, parking at elementary schools is calculated at 2.5 spaces per classroom of 30;
using that formula on this site, the parking requirement would be 61 spaces. Burnsville
requires one space per staff member on the largest shift, plus one space per two classrooms
which on this site would equate to roughly 83 spaces needed.
BACKGROUND:
ISD 196 is in the process of upgrading most of the District schools to provide enhanced
building and site security. Many of the schools will have the front entrance modified to
provide a secure entry to the building. At the same time, in several cases, classrooms are
also being added. Lastly, where room is available on the site, the District is separating bus
traffic circulation from parent traffic circulation within the parking lot. The Cedar Park
Elementary Improvements project involves all three elements.
BUDGET IMPACT:
N/A
ATTACHMENTS:
Background Material
Memo
Map
Plan Set
Applicant Letter
Cedar Park Elementary Improvements
PROJECT REVIEW
Existing
Conditions
Property Location:
7500 Whitney Drive
Legal Description:
(Per Warranty Deed Doc. No. 360219)
The South 3/4ths of the Southeast 1/4th of the Northwest 1/4th of Section 22, Township 115, Range
20 according to the Government survey thereof:
And also including as a part of the land herein conveyed, the East 33 feet of the Southeast 1/4 of the
Northwest 1/4 of Section 22, Township 115, Range 20 except the south 22 acres thereof, according to
the Government Survey, subject to easements thereon of record.
AND
(Per Quit Claim Deed Doc. No. 567409)
All that part of the north 20 rods of the Southeast Quarter (SE -1/4) of the Northwest Quarter (NW -1/4)
of Section 22, Township 115, Range 20, Dakota County, Minnesota, described as follows:
Beginning at a point in the south line of the north 20 rods of the SE -1/4 of the NW -1/4 of said Section
22, distant 1315.64 feet westerly of the southeast comer of the said north 20 rods of the SE -1/4 of the
NW -1 /4; thence westerly along the south line of the said north 20 rods of the SE -1/4 of the NW -1/4, a
distance of 20.32 feet, more or less, to the southwest comer of the said north 20 rods of the SE -1/4 of
the NW -1 /4; thence northerly along the west line of the said SE -1/4 of the NW -1/4 a distance of 330
feet, more or less, to the north line of said SE -1/4 of the NW -1 /4; thence easterly along the north line
of the said SE -1/4 of the NW -1/4, a distance of 23.59 feet, more or less, to a point distant 1312.02 feet
westerly of the northeast comer of the said SE -1/4 of the NW -1 /4; thence southerly 330 feet, more or
less, to the point of beginning.
Source: Boundary, Location, Topographic and Utility Survey, Sunde Land Surveying, May 19, 2017.
Comprehensive Plan
Designation
INST-Institutional
Zoning
Classification
P -Institutional
Existing Platting
Lot is unplatted.
Current Land Use
Elementary school
Size:
668,750 sf (15.35 acres)
Topography:
Flat
Existing Vegetation
Urban landscape
Other Significant
Natural Features
N/A
Adjacent
Properties/Land
Uses
NORTH
Delegard Plaza & Oaks of Apple Valley
Comprehensive Plan
C -Commercial and MD -Medium Density Residential, 6 to 12
units/acre
Zoning/Land Use
PD -532 (commercial) and M -6C (Medium density res'l, 6-12
units/acre)
SOUTH
Morningview 9th Addition
Comprehensive Plan
MD -Medium Density Residential, 6 to 12 units/acre
Zoning/Land Use
PD -251
EAST
Carol Center 4th Addition (Red Robin, Holiday, Carmike Theater)
Comprehensive Plan
C -Commercial
Zoning/Land Use
PD -400
WEST
Morningview (Single family)
Comprehensive Plan
LD -Low Density Residential (0-6 units/acre)
Zoning/Land Use
PD -251
•••
••••
1100••
••••
CITY OF Apple11
MEMO
Public Works
TO: Kathy Bodmer, Planner
FROM: Brandon S. Anderson, City Engineer
DATE: August 31, 2017
SUBJECT: Cedar Park Elementary School Addition Final Plat
Alex,
The following are comments regarding the Cedar Park Elementary School Addition site plans
dated June 13, 2017. Please include these items as conditions to approval.
General
1. All work and infrastructure within public easements or right of way shall be to City
standards.
2. Provide a narrative of how the buildings will be constructed and any impacts prior to
building permit authorization. The narrative shall include the following:
a. Shoring (if applicable)
b. Material Storage.
c. Haul routes to and from the site.
d. Phasing
Permits
3. Provide a copy of the executed Minnesota Department of Health, Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency, Met Council, Department of Labor and any other required permits.
4. A right of way permit will be required for all work within public easements or right of
way.
5. A Natural Resource Management Permit (NRMP) will be required prior to any land
disturbing activity commences.
Site
6. Proposed access to Existing Parking 1 is recommended to be relocated west to better align
with existing drive aisle into the site and create further spacing from Cedar Avenue. The
existing driveway entrance should be utilized.
7. Stop signs should be provided at driveways leaving the site and indicated on plans.
8. Additional direction striping is recommended in the existing parking lot 1 and 2 to better
direct parent drop off/pick up routing.
9. Site Statistics table should be updated with correct information on sheet C1.21 and C1.31.
10. Provide additional dimensions on site plan indicating radiuses, drive lane widths, etc...
11. Provide setback lines on site plan.
12. Provide additional drawing showing Auto tum turning movements to verify site circulation
and layout requirements for planned vehicle usage to be used onsite. Please indicate (or
show vehicle) stacking distances on the plan as circulation indicates potential for vehicles
to back up onto public roadways at exit and entrance access' to the site. Show truck
movement with Auto turn entering site to ensure emergency and service vehicle can
maneuver directly to front entrance.
13. A commercial driveway entrance is required at all access points to public roadways per AV
Plate No. STR-4 or STR-5.
14. Provide pedestrian curb ramps per STR-10.
15. Temporary traffic control plan will be required to be submitted for review and approval
for driveway connections in Whitney Drive prior to building permit authorization.
16. 12 Ft. Chain Link Backstop and Gaga ball pit as shown per sheet C1.11 is not indicated
to be removed or relocated, but remains to be located in infiltration area and proposed
hard surface play.
17. Clarify on sheet C1.21 if existing play equipment is to be relocated to proposed hard
surface play area.
18. Provide additional sidewalk/trail connection from bus loop/hard surface play to proposed
8' pathway along west site of site.
19. No Parking changes may be necessary along with additional striping and signage along
Whitney Drive for site lines for new bus loop entrance.
Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control
20. Final Grading Plans shall be reviewed and approved by City Engineer.
21. Additional details are required to indicate how drainage from proposed bus loop will be
directed to proposed infiltration area. Pre-treatment is required.
22. Final Storm water Management Plan shall be reviewed and approved by City Engineer.
23. Approximate Erosion Control Device Quantities shall include updated quantities on sheet
C1.51.
24. Erosion control measures shall be installed prior to beginning grading operations.
25. A construction entrance shall be provided at all proposed entrances to be utilized for
erosion control purposes.
26. Street sweeping shall be performed as necessary to address material tracking from the site.
27. The location and elevation of the site emergency overflow(s) (EOF) shall be identified on
the plans. All critical HP and LP shall be identified along with drainage arrows.
28. 2% minimum grades are required in all landscaped areas.
29. Provide the overall site composite Curve Number (CN) along with the impervious % on the
area tabulation
30. Lowest floor levels shall be 1.0' above the EOF.
31. Silt Fence locations in NW comer of site should correctly reflect grading limits.
32. Soil borings/testing shall be provided in the area of infiltration features prior to building
permit authorization.
Sanitary Sewer, Water Main and Storm Sewer
33. Final locations and sizes of Sanitary & Storm Sewer and Water main shall be reviewed
with the final construction plans and approved by City Engineer.
34. Proposed water main as shown to be relocated for building addition 1 shall be privately
owned and maintained.
35. Proposed CB -5 should be routed to Proposed CB -3 in lieu of connecting to existing CB -4
in Cedar Avenue.
36. Proposed CB -2 should be routed to SMH in lieu of connecting to existing CB -1 in
Whitney Avenue.
37. Existing 18" storm sewer that runs thru proposed infiltration basin shall be relocated due
to proposed ±4' of cut proposed above pipe for construction of infiltration basin.
38. Adjustment of Sanitary Sewer and Storm Sewer structures are required where grade
changes are shown.
39. Remove references to unused detail plates from sheets C2.11- C2.13.
Landcape and Natural Resources
40. Restoration/Landscape plan should indicate required buffers and appropriate seed mixtures
for infiltration area, aquatic bench and upland areas associated with any storm water basins.
41. Landscape plan should clearly indicate drainage and utility easements and property line.
42. No major tree plantings shall be located over any underground utilities. Clusters of trees
shall be used near or around these areas instead of planting in a row. The Drainage and
Utility Easement will require clearance around the underground utilities, or the
expectation that trees may have to be removed for access when needed.
43. Plans show a sediment control log going through the infiltration basin through the eastern
portion of the basin. Sediment controls should be around the entire basin and not through
the basin to provide adequate protection during construction. Sediment controls placed
at the base of infiltration basin slopes without erosion control on the basin slopes
themselves is inadequate protection from sedimentation and clogging of the basin and
does not comply with state or local standards.
44. Silt fence would provide more protection from equipment driving through the basin and
improper material storage in the basin than sediment logs.
45. The treatment area appears to only address new impervious at the rear of the
property. As this property is within the East Lake TMDL, an effort to treat some the
existing hard surfaces should be considered.
46. The infiltration basin lies between a path & parking area and between a parking area &
sporting fields. Add sidewalk or trail connection to redirect foot traffic around the
infiltration basin, without cutting through as a short cut, to limit compaction and
guarantee proper functioning of the infiltration basin. The City recommends changing
the grass plantings in the basin to taller native plants or shrubs to discourage walking
through the basin as a shortcut. Native plants would be consistent with the STEM focus
of the school.
47. It is unclear that a mix of fescue will hold up to the conditions experienced within the
basin. Additionally, mown grass tends to show more the sediment and trash collected in
the basins over time.
48. Ensure tree removals do not jeopardize the School's Certified Forest status.
49. Quantities and locations of trees should be indicated on plan to show diversity of species.
Some species appear on the Plant Schedule but not on the plan.
50. Some of the different details on the plans for the infiltration basins seem
inconsistent. For example, some areas mention seeding, while others indicate the use of
mulch (seed is unlikely to germinate with several inches of mulch covering it — that is
part of the reason you use mulch — to guard against weeds germinating).
51. I would recommend against using seed to establish the basins. Seed provides a "fuzzier"
less organized look for the basins. It makes it difficult to identify what is a weed and
what is not. Shrubs are also a planting option for ease of maintenance. If seed is
selected, a longer establishment maintenance schedule will be needed to keep the basin
weed free and ensure vigorous growth; a year minimum after seeding is generally
required. Also, timing for when seed will be installed will need to be indicated. There
are certain times of year that installing native seed should be avoided.
52. Basins need to be kept off line (no water entering) until vegetation has been
established. This timeline will be longer for seeded areas.
53. Staging of installation and protection of the area the basins are in needs more detail.
54. Shredded hardwood mulch should be used. Shredded hardwood much aids in the uptake
of certain pollutants. Shredded hardwood mulch is better for plant health. Mulch should
NOT be used if seeding; a blanket or hydro mulch should be used instead.
55. Absolutely no fabrics shall be installed in the basin: no protective weed barriers, no fabric
over gravel around drain tile. Fabrics will clog will fine sediments. Socks around drain
tile shall conform to Dakota County Low Impact Development Standard 2.44 p.7
http://www.dakotaswcd.org/pdfs/Dakota%20LID%2OStandards%2ORevised%2002-09-
12.pdf.
56. A 3 year Maintenance plan is required from the proposed filtration basins.
a. The property owner shall maintain healthy plants suitable for use in raingardens
throughout the raingarden. The property owner shall replace dead or diseased
vegetation with plants capable of tolerating conditions encountered in the
raingardens.
b. The raingarden shall be kept free of non-native invasive plant species and noxious
weeds, including buckthorn.
c. The overall areas of the raingarden shall not be reduced during the maintenance
term.
d. The raingarden shall be watered such that it receives 1 inch of water per week
combined from rain and other sources during the first growing season.
e. Fertilizers shall not be applied to any part of the raingarden.
f. Insecticides and fungicides shall only be applied when damage from non-native
species is of concern.
g. Herbicides shall be limited to spot applications.
h. The property owner may remove dried vegetation once a year in the spring prior
to May 30th if desired.
i. The property owner shall maintain at minimum a three inch layer of shredded
hardwood mulch for the maintenance term.
j. The raingarden must drain free of water within 48 hours after a rainstorm except
for in times of frozen soils.
57. The property owner is responsible for locating all utilities prior to installation. The
owner shall only hand dig within 2 feet of utility markings. The raingardens shall not be
installed over any utilities.
0
4
4
City of Apple11
MEMO
Building Inspections
TO: Kathy Bodmer, Planner
FROM: George Dom, Building Official
DATE: August 25, 2017
SUBJECT: 7500 Whitney Drive Cedar Park Elementary
• Separate sign permits are required.
• SAC determination is required from Met Council prior to permit issuance from the city.
• Geotechnical report boring log and Special Inspector Agreement is required prior to permit
and soil corrections on site.
• The Department of Labor and Industry has jurisdiction with regards to plan review for the
building and mechanical permits. The City of Apple Valley has a delegation agreement
with the State of Minnesota to conduct the inspections for the Building, Mechanical and
Electrical permits.
• The State of Minnesota Plumbing Division will conduct all plumbing, storm, sanitary and
water review and do all required inspections.
• The plan set should be signed by the architect and engineer.
s
M -7C
■
aft-
4,wa
m. mm'
■•
.., EV■■
z
R-3
z
w
W/*:�:7
- ivr!
ommong
.4.4
z
WWI as
"nip •
cm gr- as
'#441111111111114
1
P LB
COUNTY ROA
■■■■■■■■L
IIIEUIrrek-
4FP'
.41
4
■■'
■■,
■-•
NMI
CO RT
z
0
■
411)16*
■■E
■!-
■■1'
1***
■•
&um,
15 TH ST W 150TH ST W
I■■■■■■■■■■.
*115111001111111111111
•
Afr
4
•
a
■■ !P!M"
'414 pi
#.0,ak
sr
■mons■"VERIL.I.,..;i:IMMO
z
PIPkc�
HWY 42
148TH ST W
149TH ST W •
m
R-3
FI
0
�• O
IRw
A NEE;
;4:-3
*AV.
AA
.44001
'awn
mos
--*0.
12
9 ago*
R-3
ko,,- k
141-
rr
*Os
444400
MAIO*_ft*
•1
M -6C
ITNEY DR
M -
8C
R-3 M -6C
■
D-
1
2
ALaVnt\
�
2
153P!DST W
PD
532
0
A
•
Walarb
IBM mmows. marl p
amle =Slewr
7,7
r�rr
2
�r
�
r
ma
we rows
r� r�rr
0 IOUs
r Soma102 ,4111.11.3 trqr:Amon„iv 1111111111k
w Ns
ilk- NISI 1"111 Ammo
HMI IMO j
1111
Y
a
101
PD-
JuINu
ii*AT I ME :.
i'd ilite 1. tire.p4Ws Wil
.. . y I -..N‘i .-Ara _1 olibbilmii_iiiturol I!"111:11121:
i VtiapiSIM- 4r11:1111S„rdA\
igaitalMilefikk*rfrfk”
"iiiilianki 4 ei r f160 r
ttlfigrou 4141.4"6-0
Arim Ewan
Ari
��
,..4 11,1p. lEpril6ers
■ ..■ ■
Oblique Aerial
Cedar Park Elementary
A
MN
;6'21''E 1491.76
A S S
CONCRETE
0
0
0
1071.76
TH LINE OF THE SE 1, OF SEC. 33
0
0
Tx111:$9
S89,56'21"E /49/.76
141-1177VEY DRIVE
4 PER DOC. NO. .0667
11111161111111, WA&
BITUMINOUS
CRASS
.93.0
OF CONCRETE
ffErlr! 7-56r1FE:
OUTSVOCFTZTO
ELEn 956.951/FEET
CONCRETE
.1 34.7
ELF(if7Fir
Eau
BM
TOP OF CONCRE7E
LD'grdEr
Er
CB
52.7
1.67.1uNr
LA
S N D
/
LA
79.9
EIFIY7DAFL,
cE°:4R7s.`57;:iffil"
BnIgfr/r
J2 6
J .6
32 6
glifAlliEgr
s s C1.0„ „sO
EL CD (=I
CONCRETE
CONCRETE
BAI
171
CXF8ILFE,
- 956.98 FEET
L -_-
D EJ
CONCRETE
OF THE SE 1, OF SEC. 33 ---\ 000004
1- 7-
I I I N89,56121 'W 1074.64
. . .
3
ENA
Eno
X 2
Pik)
it,SISSS
75-
0
75 a2
SOP
fa*
NOTES:
1. REFER TO SHEET C1.41, GRADING PLAN, FOR GENERAL NOTES.
MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE TO SITE AND PROTECT EXISTING VEGETATION AND SITE FEATURES
(c)UARD:,,B ,AV,V,s,k,Lit.r\k,VH71c/I:NATRt 5,1„V,ERREHZA.OLAND UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, SIGNAGE, FENCING,
3. REPAIR OR REPLACE EXISTING PROPERTY AND SITE FEATURES, INCLUDING GRASS AND
vS:"IESTF'.41c1°,10'NwAT'DHAT Nig i= lAirc ioss Fri ATNoi ATGHEEDoBjNTEHRE. WORK, TO OWNER'S
ns--,r„-\rn,T-pr:NT0T,ROTNowirfirr',3BEEAF,Ti=g2TRFicAocNTDuALoic,inDFz=iTri,;,EEit.
CHARACTERISTICS.
LEGEND
CONCRETE PAVEMENT REMOVALS
KKKKKK CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER REMOVALS
I /
BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT REMOVALS
UTILITY REMOVALS
0 TREE REMOVALS
LANDSCAPING REMOVALS (MULCH, SHRUBS ETC.)
SAWCUT
.0 REMOVALS KEY NOTE
PROPERTY LINE
KEY NOTE LEGEND
.0 REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT TO NEARESTJOINT
aREMOVE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER / VALLEY GUTTER
aREMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
eREMOVE GRAVEL SURFACE
RENIOVE AGLIME
.0 REMOVE FENCING (INCLUDING FOOTINGS AND GATES)
8 REMOVE TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGN AND POST
RENIOVE BOLLARD AND FOOTING
aREMOVE RETAINING WALL
eREMOVE STORM SEWER
eREMOVE STORM SEWER STRUCTURE
eREMOVE SANITARY SEWER
eREMOVE SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURE
eREMOVE WATERMAIN
eREMOVE HYDRANT
eREMOVE GATE VALVE
eREMOVE TREE
eREMOVE LANDSCAPING (MULCH, SHRUBS, ETC.)
eRENIOVE PLAYGROUND STRUCTURE / EQUIPMENT
eREMOVE PLAYGROUND MATERIAL (MULCH, EDGING, ETC.)
.01 RECLAIM BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
eSAWCUT
.0 PROTECT CONCRETE PAVEMENT
.0 PROTECT CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER / VALLEY GUTTER
aPROTECT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
8 PROTECT GRAVEL SURFACE
aPROTECT AGLIME
aPROTECT FENCING (INCLUDING FOOTINGS AND GATES)
aPROTECT TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGN AND POST
aPROTECT BOLLARD AND FOOTING
aPROTECT RETAINING WALL
6 PROTECT STORM SEWER
ePROTECT STORM SEWER STRUCTURE
ePROTECT SANITARY SEWER
6 PROTECT SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURE
ePROTECT WATERMAIN
6 PROTECT HYDRANT
6 PROTECT GATE VALVE
ePROTECT TREE
6 PROTECT LANDSCAPING (MULCH, SHRUBS, ETC.)
ePROTECT PLAYGROUND STRUCTURE / EQUIPMENT
ePROTECT PLAYGROUND MATERIAL (MULCH, EDGING, ETC.)
.0 REFER TO SHEET CXXXX UTILXXX FOR TREATMENT
.0 REFER TO SHEET CXXXX GRADXXX FOR TREATMENT
aREFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR TREATMENT
.0 REFER TO ELECTRICAL PLANS FOR TREATMENT
aREFER TO MECHANICAL PLANS FOR TREATMENT
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
CEDAR PARK
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL ADDITION;
7500 VVHITNEY DR,
APPLE VALLEY, MN 55124
WOLD ARCHITECTS
AND ENGINEERS
Saha Pa., MN 35101
wotdae.com 651.227.7773
ANDEATZ-Z77.,•'°"•
IIVC.
ZEFIF"''' • • ""ZIEF:
Check DAR
SITE REMOVALS
PLAN
Scale: 30.
C1.11
MN
NOTES:
1. REFER TO SHEET C1.41, GRADING PLAN, FOR GENERAL NOTES.
2. NuSN iLlZsTgTFHAECREZEChliJAlt r GE OF PAVEM ENT, C ENTER LINE OF
3. CHECK ALL PLAN AND DETAIL DIMENSIONS AND VERIFY SAME BEFORE FIELD LAYOUT.
4. SIGNAGE SHALL BE INSTALLED 113" BEHIND THE BACK OF CURB OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT.
6.
'11N-/ :DB-SY:111E IgCBE7 IABSETT6'.!E0 UT 10- 1%1'0'1 LTNDDWSH111 /Bk 'LILA! gl;DBEEDB IOBRN :Er:ET E
\AV 'CI EOENESIhhEIEVNBT71 NBITg-Rr: E41:7,11 ;LET G'EE)JB=TD-rg BU IE'1,:N71j\G-ESBLE/V_BL TNTO°T BEL
2ff.:,1,;ThAj,:,IN_VD2gMs,O,VR:"AT:Srn:TFLJLOLNHT4.7.THWEZNT,ENXT1NG AND NEW AS REQUIRED TO
7. FAILURE OF TURF DEVELOPMENT: IN THE EVENT THE CONTRACTOR FAILS TO PROVIDE AN
ACCEPTABLE TURF, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RE -SOD OR RESEED ALL APPLICABLE AREAS,
AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER, TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER.
LEGEND
R E FIET jC FEET' VTINB)171t171(EBTOATI LT SO M )
- - -BASELINE FOR DIMENSIONS
PI
PT
POINT OF INTERSECTION
POINT OF TANGENCY
PCC POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE
E PROPOSED CONCRETE WALK
E PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB
PROPOSED LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
PROPOSED HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
PROPOSED SOFT PLAY AREA
PROPOSED TENNIS COURT PAVEMENT
PROPOSED RETAINING VVALL
PROPOSED CHAIN LINK FENCING
PROPOSED CHAIN LINK FENCING WITH MAINTENANCE STRIP
PROPOSED TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGN
• SIGNAGE KEY NOTE
PROPOSED BOLLARD
PAINTED ACCESSIBLE SYMBOL
PROPOSED MANHOLE (MH)
PROPOSED CATCH BASIN (CB)
PROPOSED RISER INLET (RI)
PROPOSED SURGE BASIN (SB)
<1 PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION (FES)
+ PROPOSED HYDRANT (HYD)
N PROPOSED GATE VALVE (GV)
PROPOSED POST INDICATOR VALVE (PIV)
PROPOSED FLAGPOLE - REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
PROPOSED BUILDING STOOP - REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
▪ PROPOSED LIGHT POLE - REFER TO ELECTRICAL PLANS
- - - - PROPERTY LINE
pia
SITE STATISTICS:
EXIST:1,9A 1;',;1/4 r12,,1„<1/41=%3U h),I,TxSsiXrAXLTLOsTA L STA L LS,:
VISITOR PARKING = XX STALLS
PROPOSED PARKING COUNTS (XX TOTAL CAR STALLS,:
STAFF PARKING = XX STALLS
VISITOR PARKING = XX STALS
BUS PARKING = X BUS STALLS, XX EVENT ONLY CAR STALLS
ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL REQUIREMENTS = X STALLS
ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS PROVIDED = X STALLS
SIGNAGE KEY NOTES
.0 STOP
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
CEDAR PARK
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL ADDITION!
7500 WHITNEY DR,
APPLE VALLEY, MN 55124
VVOLD ARCHITECTS
AND ENGINEERS
weldae.com I 651.227.7773
EE017,1P""'' • ""'"''' •
MINNESOTA
Ree=tretee her401VD Rre XX/XX/XX
Hem
Come.
DD'ratem:
Cheek DAR
N h
SITE &
GEOMETRIC PLAF
Scale: 1". 30'
C1.21
A
MN
0
0
S89'56'217- 1491.76
S89.5621 491
"E 1.76
ttiA WHMVEY DRIVE
ryoRFH LiNE oF ThE sE L/4 0F sEC. 33
1071.76 11
A074eirumiN" 1ZEE=MENT
-4K, 'keg. - . 4
/ ,141* *• I ii
11 Mil
„' , 'O• GRASS a ° eN.8.955,1w 4
G R A C CD
/ l'A•4 OA
4
44
o S...e_-...8
4 BITUMINOUS
ik
AY"// CONCR E
1* 93. 0 7
tP4e, /„ 1 EIFT 1111 irti„
,
0.-- /
fri ' 9,20' STALLS ,TTP.)
to 4::'
/
0,;-,sfro„-"gsgo,
'87211IPZEPA LC ITV,
14*. /
// *, Arj2 'A BI.D015 7ElEr
EXISTING PARKING
rallAy. D97.9:FEEr
0, . ff,.. 'Mg . EIFDtririgr II V v ,
,/ ,l, 1 \
/ 4 6 FFINvcr
/
;:: ',/
G A s d
; • 0
/
/' / '
/‘
•// /'
52. 7 29.4
/// //'//• ' 'CLA
/
/' 0 C4'
GRASS tt
• /• //
i_-COnNCRETE
A 'S 2" 0
///' ?;/ 7/4'; /,‘• ,‘‘‘‘':::‘:‘:‘‘?// //// /
/
\_ 149. 4
‘// • / ///
LA
7.R9 diSTE 7:11"/ I
BUILDING ADDITION 2
745.7 E
;;;;;,•%,::2"/;;/;:'‘:„/",‘:;;///- i 4
• 1 L _)
::::::7 i
,.
— - - - - - - '— cED/14,51/11,,SIEF-0, r
---
0 - 89,20' STALLS (TYP ''$1
suMATT:7.'
326
BUILDING ADDITION 1
-'75°A.841-EY'
132.8
GRASS CD.. sl=
//////////A
CONCRETE
CONCRETE
A
LINE PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE 0 THE SE 1/4 OF SEC. 33
T EES
00
1
1 N8956(21 'W 1074.64
999.64
GRASS
C Zia,c,7,27\
EXISTING PARKING 2
149.6
0
TREES
5
A
b
NOTES:
1. REFER TO SHEET C1.31, GRADING PLAN, FOR GENERAL NOTES.
2. CHECK ALL PLAN AND DETAIL DIMENSIONS AND VERIFY SAME BEFORE FIELD LAYOUT.
3. SIGNAGE SHALL GENERALLY BE INSTALLED 18" BEHIND THE BACK OF CURB.
5. vAv's'rNE.,Ns!rvEvNs-,°,:g-RT„Es)-(,',:,Tg-,TgE!).12V.TgFuri'=N7,-'isB,E„,_uLTN-ro°43LEL" F°R
1,v_EilDREE,M.,0_,VR:i=lii:TF,:1,TINHTZTHVVEExiE.N.riENX:TING AND NEW AS REQUIRED TO
FAtiEnllAZIUTEUFR 1,_E"\firCPORNI ThRTA:40T1:1:17AT11_41T2Er-'SIE01°ORRTIFCSTE°E11R, FAPI'l -PTLII'MIITEAREAS
AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER, TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER.
LEGEND
I I I I I
VOZW071;: :1
32:2:8:8111111
REFERENCE KEY TO SITE DETAILS
ID):T2111: ISH:=111TERP()BOTTOM)
PROPOSED CONCRETE WALK
PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB
PROPOSED LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
PROPOSED HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
PROPOSED SOFT PLAY AREA
PROPOSED TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGN
• SIGNAGE KEY NOTE
PROPOSED BOLLARD
• PAINTED ACCESSIBLE SYMBOL
PROPOSED MANHOLE (MH)
PROPOSED CATCH BASIN (CB)
PROPOSED RISER INLET (RI)
CI PROPOSED SURGE BASIN (SB)
< PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION (FES)
-4,- PROPOSED HYDRANT (HYD)
• PROPOSED GATE VALVE (GV)
• PROPOSED POST INDICATOR VALVE (PIV)
PROPOSED FLAGPOLE - REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
PROPOSED BUILDING STOOP - REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
38
PROPOSED LIGHT POLE - REFER TO ELECTRICAL PLANS
- PROPERTY LINE
SITE STATISTICS:
EXISTrAl;,;1/4:1AlIgNC:Ule)TsprLAXLTLOsTAL STALLS):
VISITOR PARKING = XX STALLS
PROPC.:1;,FP,,,,,,Ikii:Cilci;J:GC0)1.:,lers.%),!),L_sTOTAL CAR STALLS):
\BtTXRPILPIkl7GI:T B 1.)1(:11:PlLII, XX EVENT ONLY CAR STA L LS
-T,PptsR:,%fivRirgrxss=-,)=-Ls
SIGNAGE KEY NOTES
STOP
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
CEDAR PARK
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL ADDITIONS
7500 VVHITNEY DFR,
APPLE VALLEY, MN 55124
VVOLD ARCHITECTS
AND ENGINEERS
wok.... 651.227.7773
•
MINNESOTA
Fee et°, „e 40E111‘0" RDE: XX/XX/XX
Comm:
Date:
Checic DAR
North
FINISHING PLAN
C1.31
0 8
...INFILTRATION BASI 8 = 7
"" TOP OF CONCRETE
Egri" %frIIIET
71t1
SW23-..111111.11N114111k
Tel
7-7LINTAr
7500 kff/ITNEY
BUILDING ADDITION 2
FFE = 957.0 = ARCH 101.4". cRATh
ETE71 '91-7.01 FEIT
BUILDING ADDITION 1
FFE = 957.0 = ARCH 100,0"
6.3 958.5
GRASS
osa.e
9,±1, :10:11574,
955.9 968.6
1 958,
GiRA$S 3.4
11,79,36i
GEOTECHNICAL TABLE
LEGEND
REFERENCE KEY TO SITE DETAILS
EXISTING CONTOUR
EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION
PROPOSED CONTOUR
95, PROTRED=TRE=TVGN
/546
EO EMERGENCY OVERFLOW
TIAr- FINISH GRADE AT HIGH SIDE OF WALL
BW = FINISH GRADE AT LOW SIDE OF WALL
L'Atr,ORgt:;,,M.]
5S.-1
PROPOSED GRADING LIMITS
PROPOSED SAND SUBBASE AT FROST FOOTED STOOPS
APPROXIMATE SOIL BORING TEST PIT LOCATION
PROPOSED MANHOLE (MN)
PROPOSED CATCH BASIN (CB)
PROPOSED RISER INLET (RI)
ci PROPOSED SURGE BASIN (SB)
<1 PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION (FES)
-11/- PROPOSED HYDRANT (HYD)
N PROPOSED GATE VALVE CM')
PROPOSED POST INDICATOR VALVE (PI,
PROPOSED BUILDING STOOP - REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
PROPERTY LINE
BENCHMARKS (FIELD VERIFY BEFORE USING)
1.) TOP OF TOP NUT OF FIRE HYDRANT NORTHEAST OF PLAYGROUND ON WEST SIDE OF SCHOOL.
Elevation = 958.20
2.) Ts0cPHC4.LI.OP NUT OF FIRE HYDRANT50 FEET SOUTHWEST OF SOUTHWEST CORNER OF
Elevation = 985.57
3.) TOP OF TOP NUT OF FIRE HYDRANT 80 FEET NORTHEAST OF DOOR NO. 2.
Elevation = 985.98
GENERAL NOTES
1. ALL CONSTRUCTION MUST COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE STATE AND LOCAL ORDINANCES.
TRI-TI:g1GJT,RLAAT.OuF.2F.WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR AND SHALL PAY FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION
ITNCEL ?ANN -CR '''Er°Nlili:::;LEgITTArRE:iiv4i r: iYvi FPC)2.AsLuLB7viTiAATgi5Y°O1TARLLL'PlETilv4iir;:RTIOITTfi'E
CITY.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAGE (CONSTRUCTION
1f11°U T BI3E41:1BXERDYBT1? TBHUXCT -ArC7OURP (A): :DA IllUPPRBOUVUEEDMIVf4TL 0.0 21: LA BUTHUCAl I% 1E: U
INSTALL CONTROL FENCING AND BARRICADING AS NECESSARY TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC.
6. IF2rNIDEirg.OIL BORINGS TO DETERMINE EXTENT OF WORK AND NATURE OF
7. REFER TO SPECIFICATKINS FOR DEWATERING REQUIREMENTS.
8. CHECK ALL PLAN AND DETAIL DIMENSIONS AND VERIFY SAME BEFORE FIELD LAYOUT.
9. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR BUILDING AND STOOP DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT.
10. R:FER TO TH E S TO R M VEVitgro PROcLc1:1,J;IRO.NL PRREE:u11R1 TRIXRPTLRA NR(ESAP.Pr, y,11/g Ig1/41sIXARRET 0 F
:E11.11fill1Bg .F13,1'12711;LL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP.
11. BD= TAAA111D411E)13: SE04-Nr PA DAP! ts7 11:112g "LIICBIT=ITNBA 'ETV'S "F1:1C1/1'S'i liON1111 TSBEUD11/111EUNITI UOBNE
AS A RESULT OF CONSTRUCTION RtLATED DIRT AND DEBRIS.
12. MAINTAIN DUST CONTROL DURING GRADING OPERATIONS.
13. ALL EROSION CONTROL METHODS SHALL COMPLY WITH MPCA AND LOCAL REGULATIONS.
14. CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE TO SITE AND PROTECT EXISTING SITE FEATURES
(INCLUDING TURF AND VEGETATION) WHICH ARE TO REMAIN.
15. FOICR):CRI:EC,IN,TRODURS AND SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN TO FINISH GRADE UNLESS
16. .1,710017,0c71:1)0E,Lo!VATIONS SHOWN TYPICALLY AS 10.1 OR 10 SHALL BE UNDERSTOOD TO MEAN
17.
18.
„P,i,°:ErsEs'-,70ATIE'ros-r=1T:Hs'g-irtGE;-,°,-,r-,t,,°:','„,/,E-rsHALrB:,!):Z)gATTHEET3uuT,TI,RNgRADEs.
cAc'N'TX,=1„,Z-Fr:',-,LA',!:-T-BEELFIARNE,f:D",%'7,'sE4c4RA:TuE,7-rg"F'NGGR,°,1',iNG7E:E'DFocNuETiN
csTiDTEARB-LTiv-rEPRLirLEAL,N;DP0;,°:-N'tuTiT'ARBTTErTs),()XAT.HTEE°,,RAA-rv'ET,,,!.A%'ffuriRED.
ALL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH IMPORTING AND EXPORTING MATERIALS SHALL BE INCIDENTAL
TO THE CONTRACT.
19. ',-,r,f,,NsT,-,E,,NEDNETDATRF:ATREEAFRETRH-'r"07EKcif,g,Ti v3f.0Fot)-F'-irocNE-nc:FA"g:.:F°i:LGLE.'',TBR„,V--r -='Es
NEIN'Grsi`N'EFE:';',TivilZ:::6:,NODFAF7uuRN,TLFK'i',NAly'',1:ATOERDTGORN''AIit'g'AuflutT,',/irrEFN°4.RATEGv'R':"E
ADJUSTMENTS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION WILL
TLELDTOE, DE /F,12).=1°OBRK AOBXRCATOENDS V, TT FOT1117AS =RA FTPLIj:GAENNDT:T IRNLCTUDli EB' BUT BUT
ADJUSTMENTS, CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING FOR ADJUSTING FEATURE LOCATIIONS
ACCORDINGLY, SILT FENCE, ETC.
20. 1,011EIFFF,NRI,S,IiisEEDRS_,DEP,!S SHALL EXCEED 4' HORIZONTAL TO 1' VERTICAL (4:1), UNLESS
21. /F3,1A_I;,:i1,1;11RJRRBEEcDErv,:EAA:LIU;ItiDiEA "LT ::cUlrAGT PLARDAINT3r..1 A RE NOT D ESIGNA TED TO BE
OR SODDED. REFER TO SHEETS C8.1, C13.2, C8.3, LANDSCAPIFNTGUF1:1!AT1LS,AFNOBRIFICfg-LAIBI ::11J)ED
LTCgCRARTE1,4vS::,11/41/4LcLEORTTHR,ENR:EREEDA:ii,D,1:1R-UA,7ERDE BRYE,1::,:lENDS,-,1;1?.IFJFMNDNRC,:lilx":12:1ECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED
". ''',711:-'r"EEtrilr,sL°ND,F"'ERT,,,Tss-r4sig'iTEsifG.EJ);:g1GI'ETgr7u,=N7i=sB,7,,LuLTNTO('-r',\3LE'-'w F°R A
/13,ifcTI:vT,A,:v_Eil,i3:MRCu)VR:RTI:g%)11i:TF L.ILTRT4.7.TR \NEExiERN.RENX:11NG AND NEW AS R EQUIR ED TO
23. FAILURE OF TUR F DEVELOPOMN!FAR1TA !FlOTF3,1:FrATt1;1;;.HREE)..31,011F-,RFTROOIFR, FAAL1,1:SR FIFDLI7A3/,1_:EAARAE1RR,
--BNEOP1A-iggOT:l'A'IF:CTOUSETBTO THE OWNER, TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER.
24. ANY MANHOLE, CATCH BASIN, STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER, DRAINTILEROR OTHER
POTENTIAL SOURCE FOR CONTAMINATION SHALLNBE:NTSAT/Fkil_t_i:DR,AN1LcEc11,1/4,%1.1TFFR:EiLLA.RON
HORIZONTALLY FROM ANY WATEFRRMAI PER MIN
E SURED OMNTHE OUTER EDGE OF THE PIPE TO THE OUTER EDGE OF
1:1-1-T-nBNB17:111'NLALTIBOENMSOAURCE (OUTER EDGE OF STRUCTURES OR PIPING OR SIMILAR).
25. LiiiiTNITEI IFRIFF,RITET11-E0Bd LSCIfEASTIAUND ffEEVAA 'Tj:01,1j;i0 IF TS EA LMEn ;FORCE F ALL
26. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FROM EXISTING 7.1c.1,1LgATT,11,=LN-RIIMZZ,MDE
TEMPORARY STORM SEWER (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LI ITED
PIPING, ETC.) AS REQUIRRNE. EXISTIRN: STORM SEWERMSHALL N'OT BE REMOVED UNTIL
PER NT STO SEWER IS INSTALLED AND FUNCTIONAL. COORDINATE
TAELBLIPRUEMAOBVYXWITHMAPPROPRIATE TRADES (SITE UTILITY CONTRACTOR, MECHANICAL
CONTRACTOR, ETC.) AS REQUIRED.
10
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
CEDAR PARK
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL ADDITIONS
7500 WHITNEY DR,
APPLE VALLEY, MN 55124
WOLD ARCHITECTS
AND ENGINEERS
wold.e.con3 651.227.7773
A"Efrc-Lff,'"
INC.
40%0'ID XX/XX/XX
Nun,
Comm:
DD'r
Check DAR
North
GRADING PLAN
Scale: V' = 30'
C1.41
❑D
,6%l F 14.11./6
tarn
CONCRETE
ME
1071.76
ORTH UNE 0
55.7 ME 55.9 ME
/'?1 eE 1491.76 �/�//���' /''�n� �--
E DIVERIF.,RIFT) IIn x.54--- -\\\__
Ike p r) BITUMINOUS� ROADWAY STREET EASEMENT
INV-9IS.l Sfi' -18" RCP � 1.78 % 'A1'lQ
PER DOC.'N0-490667
XISTING STRUCTURE
55.
IELD VERIFY)
ris
RU�Us
W�A
75
7.6
53.8 ME
57.1
NE EOF
54.5
57.0
INV. = 951.0 = MECH 94,0"
57.2 M
/ A F 56.0 this ext
1 STORY BRICK BU/LDIN<.
CEDAR LAKE ELEMENARY Sl..
7500 WHINEY DRIVE
BUILDING ADDITION 2
FFE = 957.0 = ARCH 100'-0"
=TAL QPAIE
Q� O7QP 2
= 957.0/ FEET.
ST
fallR1w94ae
\HAfD SURFACE PLA
�
ya2
aF 54.5 ME
700 t� CARPET
HJS7DE LF 047 5
ELEK - 957.04 FEET
BO iW Y6Y.2
326
BUILDING ADDITION 1
FFE = 957.0 = ARCH 100,0"
I�ws ei
4.2 ME
ORTH UNE OF THE
1/4 OF SEC. 33
6>FT. CHAIN
�L1NK FENCE
0
EES
NOTES
1. REFER TO SHEET C1.41, GRADING PLAN, FOR GENERAL NOTES.
3.
4.
5.
7.
8.
ALL WATERMAIN PIPE SHALL BE DIP, CLASS 52. ALL WATERMAIN SHALL HAVE MINIMUM 8,0"
BURY (TOP OF PIPE TO FINISH GRADE). DIP SHALL BE ENCASED WITH POLYETHYLENE FILM
CONFORMING TO ASTM D 1248-889.
ALL SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL:4071
BE PVCS
PIPE (ASTM D 3034, SDR 26), UNLESS OTHERWISE
NOTED. SANITARY SEWER INSTALLATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2321.
ALL STORM SEWER PIPE F'-'31-61-1
ALL BE RCP, CLASS III (MIN.), WITH FLEXIBLE WATERTIGHT JOINTS IN
ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM -361 OR PVC PIPE (ASTM D3034, SDR 35) INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ASTM D2321, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
FLEXIBLE JOINTS AT STORM SEWER PIPE CONNECTIONS TO STRUCTURES:
a. IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE, PROVIDE FLEXIBLE JOINTS AT ALL
PIPE CONNECTIONS TO ALL STORM SEWER STRUCTURES.
ACCEPTABLE MANUFACTURERS I PRODUCTS:
i. FERNO, "CONCRETE MANHOLE ADAPTORS" OR "LARGE -DIAMETER WATERSTOPS"
IL PRESS -SEAL, WATERSTOP GROUTING RINGS"
OR APPROVED EQUAL.
WATERMAIN SHALL BE INSTALLED AT LEAST 10 FEET HORIZONTALLY FROM ANY MANHOLE,
CATCH BASIN STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER, DRAINTILE OR OTHER POTENTIAL SOURCE FOR
CONTAMINATION PER MINNESOTA PLUMBING ODE. THIS ISOLATION DISTANCE SHALL BE
MEASURED FROM THE OUTER EDGE OF THE PIPE TO THE OUTER EDGE OF THE CONTAMINATION
SOURCE (OUTER EDGE OF STRUCTURES OR PIPING OR SIMILAR).
ANY MANHOLE, CATCH BASIN, STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER, DRAINTILE OR OTHER
POTENTIAL SOURCE FOR CONTAMINATION SHALL 8E INSTALLED AT LEAST 10 FEET
HORIZONTALLY FROM ANY WATERMAIN PER MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE. THIS ISOLATION
DISTANCE SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE OUTER EDGE OF THE PIPE TO THE OUTER EDGE OF
THE CONTAMINATION SOURCE (OUTER EDGE OF STRUCTURES OR PIPING OR SIMILAR).
LOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES, VERIFY LOCATION, SIZE AND INVERT ;OR
OF ALL
EXISTING UTLITIES. VERIFY LOCATIONS, SIZES AND ELEVATIONS OF SAME BEFORE BEGINNING
CONSTRUCTION.
9. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF PROPOSED BUILDING UTILITY SERVICES (STORM, SANITARY
SWER, WATERMAIN), VERIFY ALL PROPOSED BUILDING UTILITY SERVICE PIPE SIZ ES, LOCAT10N5
AND ELEVATIONS WITH MECHANICAL PLANS. COORDINATE CONSTRUCTION AND CONNECTIONS
WITH MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR.
10. CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE LIMITS OF WALKS AND CURBING PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF GATE
VALVES, CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES. GATE VALVE AND MANHOLE LOCATIONS SHALL BE
ADJUSTED TO AVOID PLACEMENT OF THESE STRUCTURES IN WALKS AND CURB AND UTTER.
CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE STAKED TO ALLOW CURB INLET TYPE CATCH BASINS TO BE
PROPERLY LOCATED IN LINE WITH CURBING.
999.64
11. REFER TO SWPPP NARRATIVE (SECTION 01 69 13) FOR CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING AND
EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS.
12. MAINTAIN ADJACENT PROPERTY AND PUBLIC STREETS CLEAN FROM CONSTRUCTION CAUSED
DIRT AND DEBRIS ON A DAILY BASIS. PROTECT DRAINAGE SYSTEMS FROM SEDIMENTATION AS
A RESULT OF CONSTRUCTION RELATED DIRTAND DEBRIS.
13. MAINTAIN DUST CONTROL DURING GRADING OPERATIONS.
14. ALL EROSION CONTROL METHODS SHALL COMPLY WITH MPGA AND OTHER LOCAL
REGULAT10N5.
15. IF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES TAKEN ARE NOT ADEQUATE AND RESULT IN
16.
DOWNSTREAM SEDIMENT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CLEANING OUT
DOWNSTREAM STORM SEWERS AS NECESSARY, INCLUDING ASSOCIATED RESTORATION.
SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICE AT STORM SEWER INLETS. AT THE INLETS TO ALL STORM SEWER
STRUCTURES, PROVIDER PRODUCT FROM THE FOLLOWING LIST. ACCEPTABLE PRODUCTS:
A. WIMCO TOP SLABT'" MODEL RD 27.
B. INFRASAFEOa SEDIMENT CONTROL BARRIER, DISTRIBUTED IT ROYAL ENVIRONMENTAL
SYSTEMS, INC. SCB'S SHALL BE SIZED SPECIFICALLY FOR THE STRUCTURE AND
CASTING SPECIFIED. SB'S SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH FRAMEAND PERFORATED
SHROUD AND SHALL BE WRAPPED ON THE OUTSIDE, COVERING THE PERFORATED WALL
ONLY, WITH A GEOTEXTILE SOCK.
C. DANDY BAG®OR DANDY BAG IIOa DISTRIBUTED BY BROCK WHITE COMPANY, ST. PAUL,
MN (615) 647-0950. DANDY BAG SHALL BE USED ONLY FOR CURB INLETS AFTER
PAVEMENT (BINDER COURSE OR WEAR COURSE) IS INSTALLED OR AT EXISTING PAVED
AREAS.
D. INFRASAFEOa DEBRIS COLLECTION DEVICE BY ROYAL ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS,
DISTRIBUTED BY ESS BROTHERS, 9350 COUNTY ROAD 19 CORCORAN, MN 55357 DCD'S
SHALL BE SIZED SPECIFICALLY FOR THE STRUCTURE AND CASTING SPECIFIED. PROVIDE
FILTERRAGS ANTIES FOR COMPLETE INSTALLATION.
E. OAPPBROVED EQDUAL.
APPROXIMATE EROSION CONTROL DEVICE
QUANTITIES
SILT FENCE = XXX L.F.
SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG = XXX L.F.
ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE = XXX C.Y.
EROSION CONTROL BLANKET = XXX S.Y.
SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICE AT STORM SEWER INLET = XXX
C)
C)\\
\ J
AS
"
C7
75.00
'
• • LEGEND 9
10
eREFERENCE KEY TO SITE DETAILS
X DETAIL I.D NUMBER (TOP)
X DETAIL SHEET NUMBER (BOTTOM)
955
EXISTING CONTOUR
EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION
PROPOSED CONTOUR
PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION
ME MATCH EXISTING
EOF = EMERGENCY OVERFLOW
TWFINISH GRADE AT HIGH SIDE OF WALL
BW = FINISH GRADE AT LOW SIDE OF WALL
PROPOSED GRADING LIMITS
PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
I PROPOSED WATERMAIN
PROPOSED DRAINTILE I FINGER DRAIN
PROPOSED MANHOLE (MH)
0 PROPOSED CATCH BASIN (CB)
4 PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION (FES)
N PROPOSED GATE VALVE (GV)
O PROVIDE MINIMUM 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION AT CROSSIN?i:
- PROVIDE
VERTICAL BENDS IN WATERMAIN AS REQUIRED TO ACCOMPLISH
• SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICE AT STORM SEWER INLET
PROPOSED SILT FENCE
1« PROPOSED SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG
PROPOSED ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
PROPOSED EROSION CONTROL BLANKET
PROPOSED BUILDING STOOP - REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
PROPERTY LINE
EXCERPT FROM THE SWPPP NARRATIVE
The. fonowing is from the. Storm {rater Yonntian Prevention Ylan Narrative., Section 0189 13 of the Project Mamral. Tn arrordance with
Section 3100 00, the Cush actor than he respmufble fur full hnplernentatimt of and mandename eequved Lc the 8 WPPP Narrative mttil the
Notice. of Termination is approved, the. MPGA. Should differences arise between the.SR5PP Narrative. irdormaM. desrrthed below and the
information contained within the SWPPP Narrative, bmmd into the Peoject Mannal, the S WPPP m the Project hiannal than govern.
A.
vo5a hsreirl usleule
de,
s. ens ow,nr xneu epely for NPDEE mrexen Perron w,mrn as nnnrx ofacartl ofcomra.c
1. Once obrmned, m. ContrazSr xhall poxr the pamrt iv the Iob ore traLr m ower nurabl: temporary xrorg: area
c. rn 1 all. n. a 1- ..n n 5r mall norirym ®-ifaite xonaino
mff WRQ R P
61 IR on to the o,. ay be road up poral of m_En®rev.
�. Eoll fl 1 h1f 11 q te�a.z 1 r -e de 'b a'.a(a-sr I"x..n
nn(II.y alta crnad�5 R c aCM sr.cns ors SrYaa.:®nnd n®rot a.rs cc nvl on. ten r4
vnSvince fPrater. ofMa Stare
11 perm.ter sir fevre umer. inmarea vvrhe Dravnvgv Edt fevre shall be as rper,fieain Ee.eon 3l .s OD
2. E:diment Covnol Devirex et evsnvg storm x:werW:n[ha�belex arouml:asnngx an,l silt Rvre rrv,ler.earivgx roll votbe ec.epreble;. E�.rr aevi..s
mar,v�u�nnr nina�rnaMr Raw ar..enide may.mentx
stir femeanl f - Id - -Ib 1 -W tl - Ib f 1 1 I
0. Dehn�ate Lmrtx ofpp.d5 ax(RI az mrdder ,and proud rxualbarr aroundrhexe areax5 ponrn ssnu.tror.
natfir enrhrn mexenon.x. Itrx.ueee td that ormee avow [en.e be rnaall:d arowrd
am
atl
grg 505, rSgrvg covnacr sparking oc orb,coneeucnovrclated ar:exe will he pemcirtea
Prohibit Jirc rxv f Jearxg fiver ivl
, y rn ro drier ag roar be vv:
xaa agryeg
den
ne I
r.®a,vac ya n�:�I-uc oro,(
mr
gracing me
glut
cNrnat� vcheauling ofthis viork.nrh the Dwnei x
ride of rhe ar:ax D of allow ore xorlxl �dunentanon witlun rhe xoR play ar:ax
ry dranage (pump cg drxrharge liv:x, .t; dunvg coneeucnov ofrhe v Wlx av
" Earrh,wrk
e. Tcix �,uill noerve as temporay xrabilisanov for the pzmx
ion mr the eamr
se ar_za [or aronn dranage ax all storm water ruvoffia mvtaned ov =.ire arcd
erhe�ollonvivg:
awn rn. rods rnmexe area:.
ns aaile5 arose xafine aim.
ex this •.viR rompmt mxtorlr. D gof metorlr sorb melcenirel egNpmrnt.
a... pxoil apr.edrvg melt iv.lod. all ar.aa�r.-pt around the boildivg rurril me envivrbvildivgviock ia.omplere.
max ax xpe;R.a in s:rnon 3100 0o Earmnmrk
eiR.d rn E.crion ] I Do Do Earrhnmrk
ort of xodc).
Omrdde mannvavrc 5 ere.. e v e. ae deee ens 9.015 5,525 moth me rcgNmnrnrs of 6. 3.=
F. nnall all searmem.vmxvl Prarn.ex marhave been adlunea or rennveato zronwodare sort-rem.amsvarex -.535-
H.
r lr as Passage of ro
meJiately atierrh: xhort-term arnviry hax beerr.ompleted Nl xediment rovrml
p n..ex xhall bare-rnaall.a bemr. me mea Pr-rrPrraeon evrntrfthe d.orr turn a.:tnnnlrx mr:.ornpl.te.
x. 5.,devarenvg of ext
I. remoarar., sad s5.knile:
he xoilx and
er. vehicle.. edur35.5
w,.
p .week and inxpect repay and cover motim,-damaged arcuseNIM1M6 M1owsof r✓my EO how storm event
vfrhe properly, fie
how
Ste
Iogi; rempoary bermµ and emnorr=ovtrol dvir=y ar xr
PP P xar xe,,.5re. ana5xee mar eaxrx ma a.vir
logy, temporary bermµ and emnorr.ovtrol d.vir.a ar xrorm a.wvivLtr avd Omer emuov eovaol d.vir.e shall be cleaned whvr
me neignt afore statism ramml ae,;ae r�tnin .w harnx.
heveea shall be ivcp e.t.a fur iog®ng ofriver m.k. Wsnm.k rhaz hex become ioggea mrh aeWmevt vhWl be rcrnoverl end r.plerca
t all soaion.ovrml devises:hell or„r..vimina hours of Wcrwerv.
m r.r rehov venirlea vv to pr,blir en.ery arrd pm,eJ errvaa(v.lodrvg pendareas ov m. ronarnr.nov ar.; mull be rcrnovedvnmiv']4
vhi
thus ix a mel.arge must be made,
ntl. rh tory torr lug
be o 65. by e properly mai 65.
n,it mr canxearnan a.�iviry (.0
chedule muxr be®vvuimiv.a hourx aRegrunoff oacurx at
shall be rvep:c5d fur deem of vedi.. tears. 5 De DO., is
�oer�L�m�
rfieJ iv �e.n en 31 00 Dg.
he.
or„gra
Mrs ,lois mtappl
.e of off -afire araunrrlazrorra of s:diment. If cearmevr rx prcx:vt rr must be mnovea
Icl.:vhrn
ya h.. of m=rooF5(nate. eme,cewater mantle xmb and
m „ rrw and 555,5 5w,,5 ar m5baa
,na.eve far neriodx Inn, Hun ae hour to comply
ar kpil.x, n m:k:leen rand arra Mi. ,,,en
J. ESbilixe dumJed areas 1( 1 ting v5rkpl � .ntnin rhe mllornng vwnb�r of dayv fl (m r
1. k. soon P xaible butMno caxelater Man av M1mntM comely eNlM1 .Mnemes B3 Gniddinesre9nvmamtxpor
K. 5., 5, ...en. of ell ros., areax 5.51E555 ,,,e6101 .1
L. Ovide:leaning of norm xevwrxya.vr ar rhe :omplenon ofrhe pmje.r. CI
mrr (for example, vrb avd gutter pa avalex. IrrRleanon avd
Deannon areas a.5mion arra. ana aro,n, �r�:rereing ana xe„a5rcx;
p , iv that area:
g mall.ude r 5.0 of avvmWated xediment Rom all xuha:e waz:rs ax d.Rned by me
M 9 :file Cease e.e. ee.eldtic rivl fll Cull ea5bl .m ofure vege 0.5 DD.D5.=I5.5=4,...eDe
ra„nrWnCb NSTRUCTIO N
CEDAR PARK
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL ADDITIONS
7500 WHITNEY DR,
APPLE VALLEY, MN 55124
WOLD ARCHITECTS
AND ENGINEERS
337 Minnesom 5meer, Suice W2000
Saint Paul, MN 55101
woidae.com 651.227.7773
,17
•
I harcby termly matt specincan6n or report was prepared by
me or ucdor mr a�rr�t cupory�smc ata mat i am a duiv ���rcced
MINNESOTA
DAVID A. REY
aegistretion Numter 40160 De(a XX/XX/XX
Description
Dune
Corr=
Date:
Drawn;
Check DAR
North
UTILITY &
EROSION
CONTROL PLAN
C1 .51
MN
NOTES:
1. REFER TO SHEET C1.41, GRADING PLAN, FOR GENERAL NOTES.
2.
3.
4.
REFER TO SWPPP NARRATIVE FOR CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING AND EROSION CONTROL
REQUIREMENTS.
1A01;IfTSRCAAcPTEO:R,CRT-c1:2-1s19,1,J,AT,TiNsSOPDEANADNA,PsFE'REI/NEGFINISH GRADING BEFORE
'AV gjEgliRj RREEECE(VE EAA:LI'MUEr:111-1):LTL7EECTIVDEI 'A'S'.11 '6! FO1FATROEP 'SRO DAENTSRHAATLELBTE°SEOED D E D
OR SEEDED.
5. WHERE NEW SOD MEETS EXISTING TURF, EXISTING TURF EDGE SHALL BE CUT TO ALLOW FOR
A CONSISTENT, UNIFORM STRAIGHT EDGE JAGGED OR UNEVEN EDGES WILL NOT BE
1,7=14_,%ilpirsCiiI,VR=C0)11gTF ..,TiTHT4ErTHWEZ,IiiENXTING AND NEW AS REQUIRED TO
6. FAAILE11,7,,EA0E,FLTEUTRuFRIEVELOPMENT: IN THE EVENT THE CONTRACTOR FAILS TO PROVIDE AN
AT NO ADDI ONAL 'CTORSETCTO
NTT: CCJ -VrV°NREInl- IHT:19IS'FRA 11E1-glEl EOEF ATI-HI-EA:NT= E A R EA E'
7. :,E,:lcNiFT,IFAT.Frigt8j7,,,,Bil:i1,-IcRI,Igl;ITRIIIE,8EDIATELY AFTER SODDING OR SEEDING, REFER TO
8. ALL TREES TO BE BALLED AND BURLAPPED.
,P=:,!,ST=4:UsBpSEAFFIfikEL_. RECEIVE 4" DEPTH OF CLEAN SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH,
10. ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE NO.1 QUALITY, NURSERY GROWN AND SPECIMENS MUST BE
,ALNLoOLV0E,FNI:-RIOTRHYA'hijR6EES ADJACENT TO DRIVE AND IN PARKING LOT SHALL BEGIN
LEGEND
0
00
REFERENCE KEY TO SITE DETAILS
I8DH IE‘TTMATLE11;13TERRIBOTIOM,
PROPOSED DECIDUOUS TREE
PROPOSED CONIFEROUS TREE
PROPOSED SHRUBS
NI. PROPOSED HERBACEOUS PLANTS
APPROXIMATE SOD LIMITS
E.: PROPOSED SEED MIX #1
---- PR
OPOSED SEED MIX #2
PROPOSED NATIVE SEEDING
PROPOSED SHRUB / MULCH BED
PROPOSED LANDSCAPE ROCK BED
PROPOSED LIGHT POLE - REFER TO ELECTRICAL PLANS
PROPERTY LINE
PLANT SCHEDULE
SYMBOL COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME
DECIDUOUS S.DE TREES
AP
CO
GD
GT
QB
TA
UC
SIZE ROOT
CRIMSON KING MAPLE
HACKBERRY
Acer platanoides 'Crimson King'
KENTUCKY ESPRESSO COFFEETRE
SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST
SWAMP VVHITE OAK
REDMOND LINDEN
NEW HORIZON ELNI
CONIFEROUS 'TREES
Celtis occidentalis
Gymnocladus diocius 'Espresso'
Gleditma triacanthos var inermis 'Skycole'
Quercus bicolor
Tilia americana 'Redmond'
Ulmus carpinifolia 'New Horizon'
3" cal.
3" cal_
3" cal.
3' cal.
3" cal.
3" cal.
B&B
B&B
B&B
B&B
B&B
B&B
B&B
PG BLACK HILLS SPRUCE Picea glauca densata
PS SCOTCH PINE Pinus sylvestris
DECIDUOUS SHRUBS
\NV
HA
PS
SP
SS
TUXEDO WE IGELA
ANNABELLE HYDRANGEA
SNOWBELLE MOCKORANGE
BLOOME RANG LILAC
SEM FALSESPIREA
CONIFEROUS SHRUBS
Weigela x Velda.
8' Ht. B&B
8' Ht. B&B
Hydrangea atorescens 'Annabelle'
Philadelphus
Syringa Panda'
Sorbia sorbifolia 'Sem'
M TAUNTON YEW Taxus x media 'Taunton'
TO MR. BOWLING BALL Thuja .cidentalis
PERENNIALS / GRASSES
AN
AJ
AT
CAB
CKF
HG
FiMB
HR
EC
SC
SH
SNM
Cont.
Cont.
Cont.
Cont
Gant
45 Cont.
#5 Cont.
NEW ENGLAND ASTER
DEUTSCHLAND AST1LBE
BUTTERFLY FLOVVER
CALAMAGROSTIS BRACHYTRICHA
KARL FOERSTER GRASS
GOLD STANDARD HOSTA
MAUI BUTTERCUPS HOSTA
RED RAZZMATAZZ LAYLILY
CLEOPATRA CONEFLOWER
CHERRY TRUFFLE SEDUM
P RA IRIE DROPSE ED
MAY NIGHT SALV.
Aster novae-angliae
Astilbe japonica 'Deutschland'
Asclepias tuberosa
#1
Calamagrostis arundinacea brachytricha
Calamagrostis x acutiflora 'Karl Foerste,
Hosta 'Gold Standard'
Hosta 'Maui Buttercups'
Hemerocallis 'R. Razzmatazz'
Echinac. Cl.patra
Sedum Cherry Truffle'
#1
#1
#1
#1
#1
#1
Sporobolus heteroleps
Salvia nemorosa 'Mainachr
#1
#1
41
N1
Cont.
Cont.
Cont
Cont.
Cont.
Cont.
Cont.
Cont.
conj,
Cont
Cont
Cont
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
CEDAR PARK
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL ADDITIONS
7500 WHITNEY DR,
APPLE VALLEY, MN 55124
WOLD ARCHITECTS
AND ENGINEERS
m.:::Z71.1s5"siror""
woldac.com I 051.227.7773
Humbe, 4011r RDE:e XXIXX/XX
Des,fion
Comm:
ar esntx:
Check DAR
North
LANDSCAPING
PLAN
Scale: = 30.
L1.11
52',1
OMAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN, OVERALL
1/16" = 1' O.
0 12' 24'
BUILDING ADDITION GROSS
SQUARE FOOTAGE: 9,880 SF
i
CIRC
45',"
VESTIBULE
/
RECEPTION
CLOSET
b I'
TOILET IF
1
}
CLOSET
NURSE
0 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN, AREA 'B'
52.8
52.8
OF6
MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN, AREA 'E'
1/8'. _ NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
CEDAR PARK
ELEMENTARY 2017
IMPROVEMENTS
7500 WHITNEY DRIVE
APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA 55124
ISD #196: ROSEMOUNT—
APPLE VALLEY — EAGAN
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
3455 153RD STREET WEST
ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068
WOLD ARCHITECTS
AND ENGINEERS
332 Muntesota Street Suite W2000
Saint Paul, MN 55701
woldae.com 651 2277773
^YWENCK
Golden Valley, MN 55427
l hereof semry mottnis vlon, svesitisoeon or ravort n,�ns prepared dy
me or under mY Tres[ supervision entl that I em e duly Licensed
ARCHITECT
Ravi ions
Desnription
Jun
Comm: 152266
Date:
Drawn:
Check:
North
FLOOR PLANS
Al
a
MN
A
L GOPING, TO MATGH EXISTING
SCREENED CONDENSING UNIT
ALUMINUM DOORS AND STOREFRONT
ALUMINUM WINDOW, TO MATCH EXISTING
BRIG, TO MATCH EXISTING
PRECAST SHAPE NO. 1
PREGAST SHAPE NO. 1
32'-0"
°WEST ELEVATION, AREA 'E'
6' 12
PIGA, SHAPE NO. 1
BRIGK, TO MAT, EXISTING
ALUMINUM WINDOW, TO MAT, EXISTING \METAL GOPING, TO MATCH EXISIFING
a
I G,341ST0 SHAPE NO 1
21-6
C) SOUTH ELEVATION , AREA 'E'
el'47 T1' 'A"NR1'
e4'0\E-'01L1
, TO MAT, EXISTING
_FMRETICAKL GOPING, TO MATCH EXISTING
ALUMINUM WINDOW, TO MAT, EXISTING
PHENOLIC NALL PANEL
SGREENED
GONDENSING UNIT
°NORTH ELEVATION, AREA 'IS'
PREGAST SHAPE NO. 1
BRIG, TO MATCH EXISTING
FIETAL GORING, TO MAT, EXISTING
h,1,ASO_N,
BRIG, TO MATCH EXISTING
i::„AsoN, METAL GOPING,_TO MAT, EXISTING
0,ASEMl_
11541:LE471E
Ifir
0 SOUTH ELEVATION 2, AREA 'E' 0 NORTH ELEVATION 2, AREA 'E'
1
BRICK, TO MAT, EXISTING < SGREENED
PAINTED METAL LOUVER, TYP GONDENSING UNIT
L COPING, TO MAT, EXISTING
AL NUM KIND°, TO MAT, EXISTING
•
°NORTH ELEVATION, AREA 'E'
1/,
12'
'1-173,7
0,ASENIL
BRIG, TO MAT, EXISTING
PAINTED METAL LOUVER, T
SOREENED
CONDENSING UNIT
PREGAST SHAPE NO. 1
METAL GOPING, TO MATCH EXISTING
ALUMINUM HIND.< TO MATCH EXISTING
PHENOLIC VALL PANEL -ALUM NUM DVORS AND STOREFRONT
1
PRECAST SHAPE NO. 1
23'-2"
tGONGRETE ST010
°EAST ELEVATION, AREA '13'
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
CEDAR PARK
ELEMENTARY 2017
IMPROVEMENTS
7500 VVHITNEY DRIVE
APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA 55124
ISD #196: ROSEMOUNT -
APPLE VALLEY - EAGAN
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
3455 153RD STREET VVEST
ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068
WOLD ARCHITECTS
AND ENGINEERS
Sal. P.1, MN 55101
651 227 7773
TyAvi7WENCK
75°D '''C:I'dienn;',:llelyEl'aVN"'5a5V-1;7unte 3°'
wenck cc,n 1 9152 837 3308
IcraeltTenctIT=Li.,„I'ciT,%tl7,`,Tr2
Des,ptioc
Comm: 152266
Date:
Dra.,
Check:
North
ELEVATIONS
Scale: 1/8" = 1,0"
A2
MEMORANDUM
To: Kathy Bodmer, City of Apple Valley
From: Scott McQueen, Wold Architects and Engineers
Date: August 31, 2017
Comm. No: 152266
Subject: Independent School District #196
Cedar Park Elementary School Parking Requirement/Parking Study
As the District proposes development at its existing Cedar Park Elementary School to implement
improved safety and security at its entrance, the proposal includes a 6,680 square foot addition of
four classrooms and a 3,200 square foot addition to place the School's main office directly adjacent
to the front door to promote security and welcoming.
This project has a minor net effect on capacity that should be counted as four additional classrooms
or an additional 96 student capacity.
In review of Apple Valley City ordinances, we understand there is not a specific parking
requirement for a school building type. We do understand that the city staff have come up with a
guideline that suggests one parking stall for every four students in building capacity plus one stall
for every three staff. This guideline therefore calls for 219 parking stalls based upon the proposed
changes. We have found this guideline to be unrealistic based upon current elementary school
projects in adjacent municipalities within District #196.
Using Cedar Park Elementary, whose student population is 730 students, 70 staff members, and 27
classrooms, we can compare the variety of municipalities.
Municipality Requirement/Guideline Resulting Stall Count
Apple Valley One Stall per 4 Students 207 Stalls
One Stall per 3 Staff
Rosemount One Stall per 20 Students 64 Stalls
One per classroom
Eagan No requirement per TBD Stalls
individual review
Lakeville One Stall per 7 Students 105 Stalls
Burnsville One Stall per 2 classrooms 84 Stalls
One Stall per Staff member
WoId Architects and Engineers
332 Minnesota Street, Suite W2000
Saint Paul, MN 55101
woldae.cor 1 6 1 227 7773
PLANNERS
ARCHITECTS
ENGINEERS
MEMORANDUM
Page 2 of 3
We have also found the Apple Valley guideline for stall requirement to be in excess of what is
found at every public elementary school site in Apple Valley.
School AV Guideline Actual Deficit?
Diamond Path 219 136 83
Westview 197 103 94
Cedar Park 207 85 122
Highland 189 78 111
Greenleaf 242 134 108
Southview 213 97 116
We understand that schools often are unique facilities that require individual review and as such
are often "conditional use." We also acknowledge there are a handful of events each year in which
an elementary school can never have enough parking, such as:
• Open House/Conferences
• Grandparents Day
• Large Celebrations
As for daily use of an elementary school and the parking needs, there is a daily pattern, which is
fairly consistent throughout the year that can be studied. There are only a handful of stalls available
on any given day in the main lot at Cedar Park.
The current configuration at Cedar Park Elementary is 85 spaces. It would seem that there is
adequate parking at the site currently but to address any potential demand due to the proposed
development which adds four classrooms and approximately 96 student capacity. It appears the
average daily demand is around 83 stalls for a current student population of 730. We would project
a post development capacity of approximately 825 students; therefore, parking in excess of 94 stalls
would appear to be sufficient, if we assume proportionality and compare to similar District
facilities. The proposed development, currently, is for 107 stalls.
Concurrent with the addition and entrance project, the District is proposing to reconfigure the
assignment of bus drop-off and parent drop-off to provide additional safe separation of parents and
buses, as well as pedestrians. Currently there is very limited space to share between buses and
parents at the entry side of the school. The revised layout flips buses to the west into a new bus lot
and keeps parents on the east side allowing them to expand into former bus territory which allows
for a significant parent parking and waiting area (as parents often arrive 45 minutes early in the
afternoon) and is anticipated to shorten the afternoon queue out onto Whitney Drive. This
reconfiguration also results in some parking increase overall.
MEMORANDUM
Page 3 of 3
The design as submitted indicates a total parking capacity of 107 cars. This exceeds our observed
demand and our calculated need by approximately 13 cars.
The new bus corral is intended to be exclusively for buses and staff during morning drop-off and
evening pick-up, but it is recognized that at other times of the day, and certainly in the evenings
and weekends, it can also serve as additional parking capacity to serve the community.
We have developed this recommendation with our clients at District #196 and they believe this
proposal adequately meets their needs. The data we were able to gather, and what we have
experienced planning dozens of elementary schools, seems to support this proposal.
Let us know if you have any follow-up questions or concerns.
cc: Jeff Solomon, ISD #196
Douglas Kahl, Wold
CM/ISD_196/152264/crsp/aug17
Apple„
ITEM:
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE:
SECTION:
6.A.
September6, 2017
Other Business
Description:
Communities for a Lifetime - Presentation of Dakota County's Communities for a Lifetime
Program and Apple Valley's Communities for a Lifetime Profile
Staff Contact:
Thoma Lovelace
Department / Division:
Community Development Department
Applicant:
N/A
Applicant Date:
60 Days:
ACTION REQUESTED:
For your information only. No action is requested.
Project Number:
PCI7-06-P
120 Days:
SUMMARY:
Dakota County Public Health is spearheading the Communities for a Lifetime program,
which seeks to bring together residents, local businesses, community organizations, cities,
and county staff to create networks of vital, accessible communities. Dakota County's
Communities for a Lifetime Initiative is in the process of completing city profiles for the 11
major cities in Dakota County. The profiles highlight highlight key components that
demonstrate an age -friendly community, including a city's changing population data, housing
performance score, types of housing, transit options, land use, walkability score and other
indicators. City profiles are intended to be a resource and a strategic planning tool to assist
cities in gauging their progress in becoming more age -friendly as they undertake their
comprehensive guide planning process.
Jess Luce, Program Manager for the Communities for a Lifetime program will provide an
update on the attached profile completed on the City of Apple Valley.
BACKGROUND:
N/A
BUDGET IMPACT:
N/A
ATTACHMENTS:
Background Material
Presentation
COMMUNITIES FOR A LIFETIME CITY PROFILE
APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA
ABOUT THIS REPORT
This City Profile was prepared by Dakota County's Communities for a Lifetime (CFL) Initiative an
initiative engaging community members and leaders in the private and public sectors to create
accessible, supportive Communities for a Lifetime that enable people to lead active vital lives.
Dakota County and individual cities work together in many areas to make communities more age -
friendly. We work together on housing, public safety, transportation, workforce issues, and many
other areas.
The population is aging. This is true across the nation, across the state, and in most communities
in Minnesota. The shape and way of life in our communities needs to reflect this changing
demographic landscape. Fortunately, people of any age desire similar things. They want to live in a
community that is safe, affordable, and convenient, and that offers services and amenities that
meet their needs, and opportunities that enrich their lives. But as people age, certain community
characteristics are essential to a vital life. This profile reviews some of these features at the
community level using reliable and accessible data from reputable sources.
WHAT MAKES A COMMUNITY FOR A LIFETIME?
• Transportation options to help keep people mobile and independent
• Walkable neighborhoods for transport and exercise
• A full range of affordable housing options as needs change
• Accessible and quality services that support older adults and caregivers
in home and community settings
• Flexible and supportive employment and volunteer opportunities, including
intergenerational activities
• Effective technology to connect people and help with life's activities
IS YOUR CITY BUILDING A COMMUNITY FOR A LIFETIME?
• Does your Comprehensive Plan present a plan and a vision for residents of all ages?
• Do your land use, housing, and transportation policies take the needs of an aging
population into account?
• Are you realizing the competitive advantage of healthy, vital, and engaged older
residents?
Released December 2016 1 Communities for a Lifetime City Profile 1Apple Valley, Minnesota 1 1
Population —page3
Overall Livability -page4
Boomers in 2014
A
Age 65+ in 2014
g
AARP Livability Index
Score (0-100)
11.1%
26.9%
59
Housing - page 5
Home Owners 65+
Spending 30% or More
In 2014
Renters 65+
Spending 30% or More
In 2014
Subsidized Rentals per
100 People Age 75-84
Housing Performance
Score in 2006 - 2015
(0-100)
27%
67%
17
77
Assisted Living Units
per 100 People Age
85+
Memory Care Units per
100 People Age 85+
Non -Single Family
Homes in 2015
Homes with Single
Level Living Option
in 2014
38
3
47%
34%
Mobility -page 12
Annual Household
Transportation Costs
in 2008-2012
City -Wide
Walk Score in 2016
(0-100)
Mixed -Use Area
Walk Score in 2016
(0-100)
Percent of Streets with
Sidewalks or Trails in
2015
$13,350
21
70
57%
Daily Fixed Route
Public Transit
Door -to -Door
Transit
Volunteer Driver
Program
Traffic Crashes per
1,000 People 65+
in 2014
Yes
Yes
Yes
19
Land Use - page,
Mixed -Use Land
in 2010
Park Land
in 2010
Number of Grocery
Stores int/2Mile
Radius
0.3%
15.6%
0.5
Community Life -page20
Age 65+
Age 65+
Age 65+
Change in Crime
in Labor Force in 2014
Volunteer Hrs. in 2014
Living Alone in 2014
2010 to 2015
37.3%
134,393
28%
-23.7%
Age -Friendly Policies - page 24
Accessory Dwelling
Policy
Complete Streets
Policy
Mixed Use Land
Development Policy
Bike Walk Policy
Yes
Yes*
Yes
Yes
(All data presented in this one page overview is from 2013 unless otherwise noted.)
Released December 2016 1 Communities for a Lifetime City Profile 1Apple Valley, Minnesota 1 2
POPULATION
AGING OF THE POPULATION
The Baby Boom generation, born between 1946 and 1964, now age 50 to 68, represents a large
percentage of the population. As they age, many Boomers will want to remain in the community
where they currently live. Cities that recognize and respond positively to the aging population can
gain a competitive advantage by meeting the needs and desires of their older population, and in
doing so, will attract younger age groups that want an age -friendly community.
POPULATION BY AGE FOR APPLE VALLEY IN 2014
10.0%
8.0%
6.0%
4.0%
2.0%
0.0%
Boomers in 2014
7.9% 7.9/8 .7%
7.0%6.9/6.4%6.9/ 6.9% 6
.9/ 6.8/
5.6°/x5.5% 5.7%
4.5%
1 2.6%
1.6%1.5°/ °
°0.9/0
h cb1),cb 1),� Dk Cb1),� 1),� 1),eD,c) D` X
\)`' t• t\s° el el, `P rbc° tekQ) 0 <1P <0<° COC Cg° /lsC /l<° (bsC
Age groupings corresponding to the Boomer generation are presented in black.
Source: 2011-2014 American Community Survey (Table S0101)
In 2014, 11.1% of Apple Valley residents were 65 and older. However, this age group will grow
substantially over the next 20 years, as members of the much larger boomer cohort age. The
boomer age group (in 2014) represents more than a quarter of the Apple Valley population (26.9
%). According to AARP, since 1990, roughly 90% of older Americans have stayed in the county
they've been living in, if not the very same home. Is Apple Valley prepared for Boomers to age
in place in the community?
In a 2014 National Council on Aging Survey, 54% of older adults
(age 60+) said their community is doing enough to prepare for the
needs of the growing aging population. [11
1
The United States of Aging Survey 2014, National Council on Aging. Retrieved on September 21, 2015 from:
https://www.ncoa.org/wp-content/uploads/USA14-National-Fact-Sheet.pdf
Released December 2016 1 Communities for a Lifetime City Profile 1Apple Valley, Minnesota 1 3
OVERALL LIVABILITY
THE AARP LIVABILITY INDEX
The AARP Livability Index is a web -based tool that allows users to measure the overall livability of
US neighborhoods, cities, counties, or states based on 40 quantitative metrics and 20 public
policies defined by the AARP's Public Policy Institute. The 40 measures of livability and 20 public
policy are divided into seven major categories: housing, neighborhood, transportation,
environment, health, engagement, and opportunity. The tool allows users to compare the results
for their community with other communities, including national leaders in livability. 100 is the
highest possible score in each category. Scores above 50 should be considered above-average,
and scores below 50, below-average.
AARP INDEX SCORES FOR APPLE VALLEY AND SELECT PEER CITIES, 0 TO 100
Category
Apple Valley
Burnsville
Eagan
Lakeville
Minnesota
Total Score
59
59
59
58
60
Housing
48
51
47
41
58
Neighborhood
59
60
58
55
52
Transportation
52
52
50
47
59
Environment
59
55
60
66
62
Health
65
65
67
65
60
Engagement
57
60
58
58
67
Opportunity
71
69
69
72
62
Source: AARP Livability Index, Retrieved on November 30, 2016 from: https://livabilityindex.aarp.org
The Total Score for Apple Valley, which is the numerical average of the seven sub -categories, is
nearly identical to three select peer cities in Dakota County and the state of Minnesota as a whole.
By the measures and policies that make up this Index, Apple Valley, its peers, and the whole state
are above-average in terms of livability. Apple Valley scored highest in the Opportunity sub-
category with a 71; this category includes measures on equal opportunity, employment opportunity,
high school graduation, and population age diversity. Apple Valley is a city with a strong identity
and a bold vision for its future. Are there other cities within Dakota County and around the
country, with similarities to Apple Valley, scoring higher on the AARP Index that could push
Burnsville forward in planning for an older population?
Released December 2016 1 Communities for a Lifetime City Profile 1Apple Valley, Minnesota 1 4
HOUSING
OVERALL HOUSING PERFORMANCE
INDICATOR: HIGH OR INCREASING ANNUAL HOUSING PERFORMANCE SCORE
The Metropolitan Council rates Twin Cities' area communities to promote effective housing
development and to make funding decisions for local housing projects. Each community's score is
based on the following broad criteria: (a) Increased housing variety, (b) Housing cost, (c) Mixed
land uses, (d) Increased transportation choices, and (e) Leverage of private investment. [2]
2006 — 2015 Average HOUSING PERFORMANCE SCORES OF SELECT DAKOTA COUNTY CITIES, 0 TO 100
100 86
90 83 77 77
80 74 74 72 68
67
70
60 53
50
40 33
30
20
10
0
J• 4:e %e J\ `C` \). x\\`,0
'ee'
, \;°\ ' . _ .69 •,q) `Z"ZI. cO\'' r,•,k‘'
\). ?' ,q_Oc°61/4' ONee \, <<`" \?›
G3C) C3Co ta,
,04k 1
For the specific scoring criteria, please see: Guidelines for Priority Funding for Housing Performance
Source: Metropolitan Council Housing Performance Scores, 2006 - 2015.
From 2006-2015, Apple Valley's average Housing Performance Score was 77, with a high score of
96 in 2015 and a low score of 63 in 2007. The average score for the eleven major cities of Dakota
County from 2006 to 2015 was 69, which marks Apple Valley's average score well above average.
Its higher score suggests that Apple Valley compares favorably to its peers in one or more of the
scoring criteria: housing variety, affordability, mixed-use development, transportation choices, and
leverage of private investment. How can Apple Valley leverage its strong Housing
Performance Score and distinguish itself further in the area of housing? Could Apple Valley
improve its approach to housing further as it makes plans to develop or redevelop land?
2 Guidelines for Priority Funding for Housing Performance, Metropolitan Council, July 2015. Retrieved on Sep. 30,
2015 from: https://metrocouncil.org/Housing/Publications-And-Resources/HOUSING-POLICY-PLANS-
REPORTS/Guidelines-for-Priority-Funding-for-Housing-Perfor.aspx
Released December 2016 1 Communities for a Lifetime City Profile 1Apple Valley, Minnesota 1 5
HOUSING AFFORDABILITY
INDICATOR: SPENDING 30% OR LESS OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME ON HOUSING
This measure has long been a standard for defining housing as affordable. It is a good measure of
affordability whether a household is above or below the Median Household Income in a
community. In most communities, the cost of rental housing is of greater concern than owner -
occupied homes many more renters pay more for their housing as a percentage of their income.
HOUSING COSTS AS PERCENT OF GROSS INCOME FOR HOMEOWNERS AND RENTERS 65+ IN 2014
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
27%
73%
27%
72°/
0% 0%
Apple Valley Home Dakota County Home Apple Valley Renters Dakota County Renters
Owners Owners
67%
31%
66%
29%
0 Not Computed Paying less than 30%
Source: 2009-2014 American Community Survey (Table B25093 and B25072)
• Paying 30% or More
In 2014, 27% percent of Apple Valley home owners 65+ pay more than 30% of their gross income
for housing. This is identical to the situation of homeowners in Dakota County as a whole.
However, about two thirds (67%) of Apple Valley renters 65+ pay more than 30% on their housing.
Renters in Apple Valley face about the same housing costs as renters across the whole county.
Many renters across the County are paying a larger proportion of their income for housing. How
could Apple Valley, Dakota County, and other public and private partners invest more in
subsidized rental housing to help bring down housing costs for lower-income renters,
including older adults?
20% of Minnesota Baby Boomers were considering a move
in 2010 due to the cost of housing. (j
49% of older adults (age 60+) are concerned they will have too
little money to last the rest of their lives. 14.7
3 Transform 2010 Data Report: Baby Boomer Survey, Minnesota Department of Human Services, 2010. Retrieved on
September 30, 2015 from: http://www.dhs.state.mn.us/main/groups/aging/documents/pub/dhs16156199.pdf
4 The United States of Aging Survey 2014, National Council on Aging. Retrieved on September 30, 2015 from:
https://www. ncoa.org/wp-content/u ploads/USA14-National-Fact-Sheet. pdf
Released December 2016 1 Communities for a Lifetime City Profile 1Apple Valley, Minnesota 1 6
HOUSING CHOICE
INDICATOR: INCREASED VARIETY OF HOUSING BEYOND SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES
A person's housing needs and preferences evolve throughout their life. Housing variety, including
the cost and features of homes, allow people to grow -up and age in the same community.
Communities that lack housing variety that is desirable to older residents may lose those residents
to other communities within the county or elsewhere.
PERCENTAGE OF NON -SINGLE FAMILY HOME HOUSING BY TYPE IN APPLE VALLEY, 1990-2014
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Townhomes (single-family
attached)
❑ Duplex, Triplex and Quad
• Multifamily Rentals or Condos (5
units +)
Manufactured Home
IN"
1990 2000 2010 2015
17%
1%
9%
5%
24% 27% 26%
1% 1% 1%
10% 17% 18%
3% 3% 2%
Source: U.S. Census 1990, 2000, 2010, and 2015; Metropolitan Council Housing Stock Estimates, 2015.
Among major non -single family home housing types, between 1990 to 2015, Apple Valley saw an
increase in Townhomes from 17% to 26% and an increase in Multifamily Rentals or Condos from
9% to 18%. Duplex, Triplex and Quad properties remained roughly the same. Corresponding to
this growth, Single -Family Detached homes saw a decline in percentage from 68% in 1990 to 53%
in 2015. However, the increase in housing variety is positive. Could Apple Valley further
increase its housing variety in the coming years to appeal to older residents who may want
to down -size, or younger residents who need or prefer a non -single family home?
28% of Minnesota Boomers planning to move by 2020 reported
they are considering a townhome or condominium. ti
40% of older adults (age 60+) anticipate home maintenance will be
a concern as they age. (j
5 Transform 2010 Data Report: Baby Boomer Survey
6 The United States of Aging Survey 2014, National Council on Aging. Retrieved on September 21, 2015 from:
https://www.ncoa.org/wp-content/uploads/USA14-National-Fact-Sheet.pdf
Released December 2016 1 Communities for a Lifetime City Profile 1Apple Valley, Minnesota 1 7
HOUSING CHOICES IN LATER LIFE
INDICATOR: VARIETY AND QUANTITY OF `SENIOR HOUSING" OPTIONS
Most people prefer to stay in a single family home, condominium, townhome, or all ages apartment
as they age. However, whether due to preference or a need for support that cannot be met well in
their conventionally designed home, some make a move to "senior housing" — housing planned for
older adults. Senior housing is generally restricted to people age 55 or older; but persons age 75 to
84, and 85 and older are more likely to live in "senior housing."
UNITS OF SUBSIDIZED SENIOR RENTALS AND MARKET RATE CONGREGATE HOUSING IN 2013,
PER 100 PERSONS AGE 75-84
0 26
2
20
15
10
17
22
11
17
16
25
Apple Valley E'Jr nsvi 1 le Eagan
■
Number o ut:'s i i pec Rentals per 100 Peo p e Age 7 5- 84
Number of Market Rate Congregate Units per 100 People Age 75-64
Source: Comprehensive Housing Needs Assessment for Dakota County, MN, Maxfield Research, September 2013
2011-2013 American Community Survey (Table S0101)
Housing Type / Age
Apple Valley
Burnsville
Eagan
Lakeville
Rental (ShaIIowSubsidy)*
170
200
245
202
Rental (Deep5ubsidy)*
72
42
0
24
Independent Living (Few
Services)+
176
433
121
0
Congregate (Moderate Services)"
136
200
112
77
People Age 75-84
1,390
2,290
1,436
899
* Subsidized Rentals refers to age -restricted independent living apartments where rents are adjusted to increase
affordability for low-income seniors.
+ "Independent Living" refers to age -restricted independent single-family, townhomes, apartments, condominiums, and
cooperatives with few, if any, supportive services.
A "Congregate" refers to multi -unit housing, such as townhomes, apartments, condominiums, and cooperatives with
increasing, moderate supportive services.
(see below).
"Congregate" does not include Assisted
Living or Memory Care Facilities
Released December 2016 1 Communities for a Lifetime City Profile 1Apple Valley, Minnesota 1 8
The graph and table above present data on varieties of "senior housing" with few or very limited
built-in services. Two of the housing options offer subsidies to support affordability. In 2013, Apple
Valley had 17 subsidized senior rental units for every 100 people age 75 to 84. This is a favorable
ratio compared to its peers; however, Lakeville has the highest ratio, with 25 units per 100 people.
With the cost of rental housing being such a concern, could Apple Valley work to increase
the ratio of subsidized units for older residents? Also, are there age -friendly features inside
the housing units? Could new policies or educational campaigns encourage builders to
construct universally designed buildings to meet the needs of aging adults—and by doing
so better meet the needs of all age groups?
77% of older adults (age 60+) plan to stay in their current home
for the rest of their life. (1
UNITS OF ASSISTED LIVING AND MEMORY CARE IN 2013 PER 100 PEOPLE AGE 85+
88
Apple Valley
31
19
51l rrsvill e
21 21
111"Number o ' 0. s i lying r E :: E Aae 8
Number of Memory Care Units per Peocde
16
L kevi e•
Source: Comprehensive Housing Needs Assessment for Dakota County, MN, Maxfield Research, September 2013
2011-2013 American Community Survey (Table S0101)
Housing Type / Age
Apple Valley
Burnsville
Eagan
Lakeville
Assisted Living Units*
165
279
117
44
Memory Care Units"
14
84
94
72
People Age 85+
439
914
561
632
* "Assisted Living" refers to multi -unit housing with more intensive supportive services than the "Congregate" category
referred to above.
A "Memory Care" is multi -unit housing that, as the name suggests, provides intensive services for persons with
declining memory.
7 The United States of Aging Survey 2014, National Council on Aging. Retrieved on September 21, 2015 from:
https://www. ncoa.org/wp-content/u ploads/USA14-National-Fact-Sheet. pdf
Released December 2016 1 Communities for a Lifetime City Profile 1Apple Valley, Minnesota 1 9
This second graph looks at two Senior Housing options that offer more built-in services for
residents, such as meals, housekeeping, and transportation, and increasing levels of personal
care. Adult Foster Care programs, licensed residential homes for 4 to 5 residents age 55+, and
Skilled Nursing Facilities (i.e. nursing homes), are not included here. These types of housing
options were not included in the report by Maxfield Research, the source of this data.
Apple Valley has very few memory care units compared to its peers, and to the current size of its
85+ population (in 2014). By contrast, the city has a significant number of assisted living units; 38
units for every 100 residents age 85 or older. Apple Valley, like other cities, should continue to
evaluate if it has the appropriate number of "senior housing" units and affordable housing options
for older adults based on its current population and projections for the future.
Across the state, the number nursing home beds is being reduced and we are seeing more funding
for Home and Community -Based Services, and this trend is expected to continue. Many
communities have responded to an aging population by building more Assisted Living units. In fact,
Minnesota has more Assisted Living units than any other state in the nation. How can Apple
Valley continue to plan for and invest in housing with services to support older residents
who may want to remain in this community as they age? What if Boomers avoid moving
into Assisted Living facilities all together or wait until the very end of their life? Have some
communities over -built the number of Assisted Living units they may need?
68% of Minnesota Boomers who plan to move by 2020 will be looking for homes
where they could live on one level. fj
8 Transform 2010 Data Report: Baby Boomer Survey
Released December 2016 1 Communities for a Lifetime City Profile 1Apple Valley, Minnesota 1 10
ACCESSIBILITY AND VISITABILITY
INDICATOR: AVAILABILITY OF HOUSING WHERE RESIDENTS CAN LIVE ON ONE LEVEL
The most basic home characteristic that supports accessibility and visitability is housing that allows
a person to live on one level, with few or no stair systems. Stairs pose a barrier for many people if
their physical functions are limited. In many cities, the best option for one level living is recently
constructed multi -unit apartments or condominiums. These buildings frequently have zero -grade,
accessible entries, elevators, and wide hallways and doorways leading to one -level units. While
much less common, some single family homes, detached condominiums, townhomes, and
multiplexes also provide residents with options for living on one level.
PERCENT OF HOUSING WITH A ONE -LEVEL -LIVING OPTION IN APPLE VALLEY AND SELECT CITIES, 20149
100970
00%
00%:
40II.o
20%
0%
34%
�%
57%
31%
69%
241
76%
Apple Valley Burnsville Eagan Lakeville
One -Level -Living Option Less Possible ■ One -Level -Living Option Exists
Source: Dakota County Assessor's Office, 2014
Roughly a third of Apple Valley housing would allow a resident to live on one level of a home. By
comparison, Lakeville has fewer homes with one -level -living options, and Burnsville has more than
Apple Valley. However, even homes that offer a good one -level -living option may need to be
modified in one or more ways to make them truly accessible and visitable. Common home
modifications include adding ramps to main entries, widening doorways, improving the living -level
bathroom and shower, and moving laundry machines to the living -level. The vast majority of
residents prefer to age -in-place. How could cities, the county, and organizations support more
practical home modifications and repairs to help residents age in place? Could an Aging in
Place partnership/fund be set up to help homeowners stay in their homes—at less cost than
other housing alternatives? As new housing of all types is constructed, how could cities
encourage builders to include more accessible and visitable features in their design plans?
9 The Dakota County Assessor's Office organizes residential housing into as many as 24 categories; the categories encompass all major housing
types: single family homes; townhomes; duplex, triplex and quads; condominiums; and multifamily buildings. The percent of "one story" living units is
based on the number of one story units across all housing types. Two story homes may allow for single -level living, but this cannot be assumed.
Released December 2016 1 Communities for a Lifetime City Profile 1Apple Valley, Minnesota 1 11
MOBILITY
TRANSPORTATION COSTS
INDICATOR: ANNUAL HOUSEHOLD TRANSPORTATION COSTS
Housing is generally the largest expense in a household budget, but transportation costs typically
rank second, and so are very significant, especially for households with a low or fixed income.
Some residents seek out affordable housing, which can often be found in suburban and exurban
communities with lower land prices, but then inadvertently end up with higher transportation costs,
especially if their housing is a long distance from their work or the many basic services we all need.
The US Department of Housing and Urban Development is now promoting a combined measure of
housing and transportation affordability it calls "Location Affordability," which considers the cost of
housing and transportation together.1°
2008-2012 ANNUAL TRANSPORTATION COSTS IN APPLE VALLEY, SELECT CITIES, MINNESOTA AND THE US
$15 500
$15 000
$14 500
$14 000
$13, 500
$13, 000
$12, 500
$12, 000
$11, 500
$11, 000
$13,350
$13,350 $13,350
$14,685
$15,124
Apple Valley Burnsville
Eagan
$13,350
Lakeville Minnesota
Minnesota and Select Cities -Median Dakota County
Source: AARP Livability Index; U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Location Affordability Index.
The estimated annual household transportation costs for Apple Valley's residents at $13,350 is at
the Dakota County median, which is the same as two of its peer cities, except Lakeville, and less
than the costs experienced by Minnesotans as a whole. How can Apple Valley, and other
Dakota County cities, attract more employers to reduce daily commutes for its residents?
How can cities adjust land use policies to shorten distances and improve access to
shopping, services, and other amenities? Further, might the city explore more public and
alternative transportation services to decrease residents' reliance on cars for
transportation?
10 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Location Affordability Index, Retrieved on October 31, 2016 from:
http://www.locationaffordability.info/
Released December 2016 1 Communities for a Lifetime City Profile 1Apple Valley, Minnesota 1 12
WALKABILITY
INDICATOR: WALK SCORE, 0 TO 100
Walking, or rolling using an assistive device, is the most basic and affordable mode of
transportation. However, since many streetscapes are designed primarily for cars, walkers may
find the distances to their destination too great and the routes unsafe. Walk Scores measure the
walkability of an area using digital maps and data about distances to common amenities and
pedestrian friendliness.
City -Wide
Walk Score
Galaxie Ave
& 153rd St.
Walk Score
90-100 Walker's Paradise: Daily errands do not require a car
70-89 Very Walkable: Most errands can be accomplished on foot
50-69 Somewhat Walkable: Some errands can be done on foot
25-49 Car -Dependent: Most errands require a car
0-24 Car -Dependent: Almost all errands require a car
21
70
Source: https://www.walkscore.com/MN/Apple Valley, Retrieved on October 31, 2016
Overall, Apple Valley is a Car -Dependent city; in most locations across the city, almost all errands
require a car. However, throughout the city there are locations that are more walkable. A Mixed -
Use or Suburban -Intensity area of the city at Galaxie Avenue and 153rd Street W. achieved a Walk
Score of 70. Research shows that when people walk or bike to do their shopping they take more
trips and spend more money each month than drivers. While not all residents value walkability, a
growing number do. Strategically investing in Suburban -Intensity developments or otherwise
improving the proximity of residences and essential amenities will serve older residents
and others who value walkability.
Released December 2016 1 Communities for a Lifetime City Profile 1 Apple Valley, Minnesota 1 13
WALKABILITY
INDICATOR: PRESENCE OF SIDEWALKS
Sidewalks are the building blocks of an effective pedestrian network. When sidewalks are not
available, pedestrians are forced to share the street with motorists, access to public transportation
is restricted, and children have fewer play areas that are safe. Streets without safe places to walk,
cross, catch a bus, or bicycle put people at risk. Over 5,600 pedestrians and bicyclists died on U.S.
roads and there were 115,000 reported injuries in 2014.11 Pedestrian crashes are more than twice
as likely to occur in places without sidewalks; streets with sidewalks on both sides have the fewest
crashes.12 Walkability is enhanced even further by three core characteristics: the continuity and
connectivity of pedestrian ways (i.e. sidewalks, trails, bike lanes, street crossings, crosswalks); the
safety of the pedestrian ways; and the proximity of essential services to residences. The data of
this measure speak to the first core characteristic.
PERCENT OF STREETS WITH SIDEWALKS OR TRAILS IN 2015
57%
35 36 36° 36%
26%
Apple Valley Burnsville Eagan Lakeville.
Streets with Sidewalks — 11 -City Average
Note: "Streets" are defined here as local roads, county roads, and county -state aid highways.
Source: Dakota County Physical Development Division, 2015
Apple Valley compares very favorably to its peers on this measure. The city well exceeds the
average percentage of sidewalk coverage for the eleven major cities in Dakota County. As Apple
Valley develops or redevelops land, how might the city improve its pedestrian
infrastructure?
11 Source: http://www.pedbikeinfo.org/data/factsheetcrash.cfm
12 Source: http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/pedbike/toolssolve/walkways brochure
Released December 2016 1 Communities for a Lifetime City Profile 1Apple Valley, Minnesota 1 14
PUBLIC TRANSIT AND ALTERNATIVE TRANSPORTATION
INDICATOR: PRESENCE OF PUBLIC AND ALTERNATIVE TRANSPORTATION
Many people who are able to drive express interest in transportation alternatives such as buses,
trains, walking, or biking. But for older adults who do not drive, transportation alternatives become
critically important. Without transportation, residents find it difficult to access basic services, remain
independent, and stay involved in the life of the community. Alternative transportation options
available to residents of Apple Valley are described in the table below. (Some information in this
table may have evolved as routes are modified and providers change.)
Category
Provider(s)
Scope of Service
Description
Bus Rapid
Transit
Metro Transit
3 station stops in
Apple Valley; higher
frequency service,
seven days a week.
Metro Red Line: 903; Provides transit to the Mall
of America, a major transit hub with connections
to light rail.
Fixed -route
Minnesota
Valley Transit
Authority
Limited Local
Coverage;
Good express and
commuter coverage
Is a fixed transportation route with scheduled
designated stops. Riders are responsible for
getting to the designated stops.
Local Routes: 420, 440, and 442; Commuter
Routes: 475, 476, 477, 478, 479 and 480.
Curb -to -Curb
A -Tran -- South Metro, Mpls/St Paul
GAPP Services -- Dakota County
MNET -- Metro Area
Transit Link -- Metro Area
Requires the rider be able to meet the vehicle at
the curb. Drivers do not help individuals into
homes, apartment buildings or businesses.
Drivers pick-up and drop-off passengers at the
curb only.
Door -to -Door
A -Tran -- South Metro, Mpls/St Paul
Metro Mobility -- Metro Area
MNET -- Metro Area
Transit Link -- Metro Area
Driver provides some assistance to rider to
ensure they make it safely from their main door
onto the vehicle. The driver provides the same
service on the return trip.
Door-
through -Door
A -Tran -- South Metro, Mpls/St Paul
MNET -- Metro Area
Driver enters the home/building to provide
assistance to the rider to ensure they make it
safely through their front door and onto the
vehicle. The driver provides the same service on
the return trip.
Volunteer
Driver
Program
GAPP Services
All of Dakota County
Individuals who volunteer their time and vehicle
to provide transportation services to a
community. Most often vehicle is a sedan and
space is limited to riders with only canes and
folding walkers.
Source: Metro Transit: https://www.metrotransit,A y; "Transportation Options Resource Guide: Dakota County retrieved on July 3,
2015 from: http://www.darts1.org/transportation-options-resource-guide
Released December 2016 1 Communities for a Lifetime City Profile 1Apple Valley, Minnesota 1 15
DRIVER SAFETY
INDICATOR: DECREASED TRAFFIC CRASHES AND TRAFFIC RELATED INJURIES.
Driving a car is the most common mode of transportation for most people. This is especially true in
suburban and rural communities where mass transit options are often limited. Sidewalks and trails
are also frequently underdeveloped. For these reasons, driving conditions become increasingly
important. Some cities are making design improvements, including: better, larger signage for older
drivers; more designated left-hand turn lanes; rumble strips on lane markers or shoulders; and
improved safety at crosswalks.
NUMBER OF TRAFFIC CRASHES AND INJURIES IN APPLE VALLEY FOR DRIVERS 65+, 2010-2014
20.0
18.0
16.0
14.0
12.0
10.0
8.0
6.0
4.0
2.0
0.0
11.9
14.3
3.3
14.7
3.8
1.8
M M 1
13.2
2.3
■
19.0
4.4
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Number of Crashes per 1,000 People 65+ • Number of Injuries per 1,000 People 65+
Source: Minnesota Department of Public Safety Crash Facts, 2010-2014; American Community Survey, 2010-2014
In Apple Valley, the number of traffic crashes involving drivers 65+ increased between 2010 and
2014. Injuries have also increased since 2010. Only one fatality was recorded for drivers 65+ over
this same period, occurring in 2010. Across the US, more than 4,500 pedestrians are killed by
motor vehicles every year. However, this does not have to be the case more can be done to save
lives. These deaths are preventable. Speed does kill. Two studies, one in the US and a second in
the UK, revealed that pedestrians are killed 5% of the time when struck by a car going 20 mph; 37-
45% of the time when struck by a car going 30 mph; 83-85% of the time when struck by a car
going 40 mph. Traffic on most American streets travel closer to 40 mph instead of 20 mph. If we
reduce car speeds to 20 mph through traffic -calming road redesign, education, and enforcement
strategies, we could reduce pedestrian fatalities by 90%. How can the state, county, and cities
work together to prioritize dangerous streets for redesign and speed reduction to save
more lives?
Released December 2016 1 Communities for a Lifetime City Profile 1Apple Valley, Minnesota 1 16
LAND USE
MIXED-USE LAND
INDICATOR: PROPORTION OF LAND DEVELOPED AS MIXED-USE
Mixed-use developments (also known as Suburban -Intensity) have received increasing attention
among city planners and administrators, and the general public. Well -executed mixed-use
developments can address many livable community characteristics at once, including: housing -
type variety, convenience to shopping and services, walkability, and public safety.
PERCENT OF RESIDENTIAL LAND USE COMPARED TO MIXED—USE FOR SELECT CITIES, 2010*
f1'0.0cA
56.7
.ppl E Valley
4c: oFJ'.•I
Burnsville Eagan Lakeville
Residential EMixed Use
SOURCE: METROPOLITAN COUNCIL GENERALIZED LAND USE DATA, 2010 (*NEW 2016 LAND USE DATA NOT AVAILABLE UNTIL SPRING 2017)
NOTE: FOR MORE SOURCE INFORMATION SEE: HTTP://METROCOUNCIL.ORG/METC/FILES/6D/6DB8637A-FE3F-4F06-9548-581 B68ODE527.HTML
Apple Valley, like other Dakota County cities has a very low percentage of mixed-use
development. Suburban -intensity is not something that needs to be feared as increased "density,"
something often fought by residents of suburban communities. Suburban -intensity can be targeted
to a city's core downtown area where walkability and density can be achieved more easily. The
Central Village of Apple Valley (near Kelley Park) is the prime example within Apple Valley. Some
cities are creating age -friendly areas or districts that are benefiting from this approach. Currently,
Minneapolis and St. Paul are seeing record levels of construction of mixed-use developments of
rental apartments with commercial space at the street level. Millennials and Boomers are
competing to live in or near these walkable neighborhoods. Can suburban communities
replicate and benefit from this trend that is likely to continue into the future, or will some
suburban communities be left out?
Released December 2016 1 Communities for a Lifetime City Profile 1Apple Valley, Minnesota 1 17
PARK SPACE
INDICATOR: PROXIMITY TO PARK SPACE
Public parks and trails are a great common space for people of nearly any circumstance to get out
and interact in the community and stay healthy. To better support older residents and people with
limiting health conditions, park spaces should increasingly offer shade, shelter, a place to sit and
rest, and accessible bathrooms, all of which benefit the entire community.
NUMBER OF PARKS WITHIN A HALF -MILE IN 2013
Apple Valley
Burnsville
Eagan
Lakeville
Median US
Neighborhood
3.4
3.6
2.5
2.2
0.0
Source: AARP Livability Index, retrieved on October 31, 2016 from: https://livabilityindex.aarp.org
Apple Valley compares well to its peer cities in the availability and even distribution of its park
space. Apple Valley and Burnsville have the same concentration of parks across the city; whereas
Eagan and Lakeville have fewer parks within each half -mile radius. Some of the Apple Valley's
parks and recreational amenities are described in the table below. How can Apple Valley and
other cities continue to make parks both good places for children and older adults—more
benches and more equipment for both age groups? And how can cities continue to improve
non -motorized access to parks through sidewalk and trail enhancements, so that people of
all ages can walk, bike, or roll (i.e. using an assistive device) to their nearest park?
Select
Amenities
Number and
Land Area
Description
Public Parks
52 parks on
850 acres
Common elements include: playground equipment, skating rink,
field and court games, tennis, hockey and a shelter building.
Lebanon Hills
Regional Park
1 park on
1,795 acres
Offers a very wide array of recreational activities, including: hiking,
boating, horse riding, fishing, and winter activities including cross-
country skiing. 320 acres are in Apple Valley.
Minnesota Zoo
1 zoo on
460 acres
Fees for Admission.
Golf Courses
2 golf courses
on 380 acres
Valleywood Golf Course,18-hole (public);
Apple Valley Golf Course, 9 -hole (public)
Source: Apple Valley 2030 Comprehensive Plan, Parks and Active Living,
http://mn-applevalley.civicplus.com/DocumentCenter/Home/View/382
Released December 2016 1 Communities for a Lifetime City Profile 1Apple Valley, Minnesota 1 18
FooD ACCESS
INDICATOR: ACCESS TO HEALTHY AND AFFORDABLE FOOD
It is difficult to make healthy food choices when grocery stores and farmers' markets are not near
where you live. People who do not drive or lack transit options and those that are low-income are
forced in many instances to rely on food options that are less healthy from nearby convenience
stores, and it may cost them more money.
NUMBER OF GROCERY STORES AND FARMERS' MARKETS WITHIN A HALF -MILE IN 2013
Apple Valley
Burnsville
Eagan
Lakeville
Median US
Neighborhood
0.5
1.0
0.3
0.1
0.0
Source: AARP Livability Index, retrieved on October 31, 2016 from: https://livabilityindex.aarp.org
The AARP Livability Index rates a community's food access by measuring how many grocery
stores or farmer's markets exist in each half -mile radius within the city, a reasonable walking
distance for most people. Apple Valley has .5 stores or markets per half -mile radius, or by
extrapolation, roughly one store or market per mile radius. By this measure, Burnsville has greater
food access with one store or market a half mile from any given location. (Note: Most US
neighborhoods, including vast rural areas, score a zero for grocery stores or farmer's markets
within a half -mile. However, by contrast, the score for the city of Minneapolis is 5.3).
Sometimes residents face financial or transportation barriers in gaining access to food. What can
communities do to promote their farmers' markets to all residents, and ensure that those in
need have access to grocery stores and home delivered meals or food?
Service agencies can help close the food access gap. Dakota County has an excellent listing of
Food Shelves & Community Meals on its website.13 Ensuring that all are fed, of whatever age and
circumstance, is a basic need that all communities need to address together.
13 Dakota County, Minnesota, Food Shelves & Community Meals:
https://www.co.dakota.mn.us/Health Family/PersonalFinance/FinancialCrisis/Pages/food-shelves.aspx
Released December 2016 1 Communities for a Lifetime City Profile 1Apple Valley, Minnesota 1 19
COMMUNITY LIFE
EMPLOYMENT
INDICATOR: PERCENT OF PEOPLE AGE 65 TO 74 IN THE LABOR FORCE
Complete retirement from paid work at 65 is slowly being revised in our culture, through public
policy, but also through the needs, plans, and preferences of aging workers and employers. A
healthy labor force participation rate should closely reflect the percent of people in any age group
who express a desire to work.
LABOR FORCE PARTICIPATION AGE 65 TO 74 IN APPLE VALLEY WITH SELECT COMPARISONS IN 2014
100.0%
80.0%
60.0%
37.3%
40.0% 30.3% 29.1% 26.5% 28.9%
20.0%
0.0%
26.6%
Apple Valley Burnsville Eagan Lakeville Dakota County
Minnesota
Source: 2009-2014 American Community Survey (Table S2301)
Apple Valley has a higher rate of labor force participation for workers age 65 to 74 than its peer
cities, Dakota County, and Minnesota (26.6%) as a whole. This is a favorable result for Apple
Valley. While not all older adults desire to work for pay beyond traditional retirement age, a
significant portion do and will. And others will need to because of their personal financial
circumstances. Older adults should be able to work with various accommodations and incentives to
participate in the shrinking workforce. How are local businesses helping older workers to
remain in the workforce?
23% of Minnesota Boomers have no plans to stop
paid work at any age. el]
32% of older adults (age 60+) are concerned they will not be able
to work as long as they would like. ri
14 Transform 2010 Data Report: Baby Boomer Survey
15 The United States of Aging Survey 2014, National Council on Aging. Retrieved on September 21, 2015 from:
https://www. ncoa.org/wp-content/u ploads/USA14-National-Fact-Sheet. pdf
Released December 2016 1 Communities for a Lifetime City Profile 1Apple Valley, Minnesota 1 20
VOLUNTEER CAPACITY
INDICATOR: INCREASED VOLUNTEER HOURS FOR PEOPLE 65+
A growing number of people will remain in the workforce past the age of 65, but whether working or
retired from paid work, older residents will volunteer in great numbers. Volunteering is not only a
vital form of enrichment for older adults, but it is also a valuable community asset that should be
utilized fully.
ESTIMATED VOLUNTEER HOURS FOR POPULATION 65-74 AND 75+ IN APPLE VALLEY IN 2014
Apple Valley
-
Age 65-74 ■ Age 75+
160,000
93,330
41,063
20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 140,000
Apple Valley
Population
Statewide
Volunteer RateVolunteer
by Age Group
Estimated Number
of Volunteers*
Estimated
Hours
Per Year
Estimated
Volunteer
Hours*
Age 65-74 3,583
40.7%
1,458
64
93,330
Age 75+ 1,978
34.6%
684
60
41,063
*The estimated volunteer capacity in Apple Valley is an extrapolation based on reliable statewide data.
"Source: 2014 Volunteering in America, Corporation for National & Community Service;
2009-2014 American Community Survey (Table DP05)
Older adults in Apple Valley provided an estimated 134,393 hours of volunteer service in 2014, the
most recent data available. This is the equivalent of 64.6 full time equivalent employees, and at a
rate of $24.00 per hour, this amounts to a wage -labor value of $3,225,432. Older adults and aging
Boomers are assets to the community; they spend more money locally, and they value their
communities and most want to give back. Communities that provide meaningful opportunities for
older adults to volunteer will capitalize on this vital source of talent and energy. Four Dakota
County cities (Apple Valley, Inver Grove Heights, West St. Paul, and Rosemount) have partnered
to fund a volunteer coordinator position to try to take advantage of residents desire to volunteer.
How can Apple Valley further capitalize on older adult volunteers as an asset to the
community?
Released December 2016 1 Communities for a Lifetime City Profile 1Apple Valley, Minnesota 1 21
LIVING ALONE
INDICATOR: PERCENT OF PEOPLE 65+ LIVING ALONE
Some people live alone and are content with their circumstances. However, people who live alone
tend to have less income, and as they age, find it more difficult to remain mobile, access services,
and stay involved in the life of the community. Communities need to be aware of this segment of
the population and better shape the community environment to support these residents.
AGE 65 AND OVER LIVING ALONE, 2000 AND 2014
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Apple Valley 2000
Apple Valley 2014
Males ■ Females
Source: 2009-2014 American Community Survey (Table B09020); US Census 2000 (Table P030)
21%
7%
Dakota County 2014
The proportion of older adults living alone in Apple Valley grew between 2000 and 2014, from 26%
to 28%. In Apple Valley, as in most communities, many more female residents live alone as
compared to men. When living alone turns to isolation, individuals can experience physical and
mental decline. In circumstances like this, what could be done to better identify and assist
isolated older adults? Could nonprofits or faith communities partner to provide home visits
or check -ins by phone? Could more formal neighborhood networks be helpful to those
living alone and create stronger neighborhood connections and support for everyone?
48% of socially -isolated older adults list transportation as the
thing they will most likely need help with in the future. ri
16 The United States of Aging Survey 2014, National Council on Aging. Retrieved on September 21, 2015 from:
https://www. ncoa.org/wp-content/u ploads/USA14-National-Fact-Sheet. pdf
Released December 2016 1 Communities for a Lifetime City Profile 1Apple Valley, Minnesota 1 22
3,098
2,374
PUBLIC SAFETY
INDICATOR: DECREASED CRIME
All residents want to feel safe in their community. Feeling unsafe negatively affects residents'
participation in the community. For older residents, too, feeling unsafe inhibits their trips out of the
home for services, work, volunteering, or recreation, leading to harmful isolation.
CRIME RATES IN APPLE VALLEY, 2010-2015
9, 000
8, 000
7, 000
6, 000
5, 000
4, 000
3, 000
2,000
1.000
2010 2011 2012
1
2,436
2013 2014 2015
Part 1 Crime Rate • Part 2 Crime Rate
* The crime rate represents the number of reported crimes per 100,000 in population.
** Part 1 Crimes: murder, rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, larceny, vehicle theft and arson;
Part 2 Crimes include: other assaults, forgery, fraud, vandalism, sex offences, drugs and alcohol and DUI
Source: Minnesota Department of Public Safety State Crime Books, 2010-2015
Overall, crime rates in Apple Valley declined by 23.7% between 2010 and 2015, particularly crimes
categorized as Part 2 crimes, which includes: forgery, fraud, vandalism, sex offences, drugs and
alcohol, and DUI. How can all communities continue to work with residents to lower crime
rates and increase engagement of all residents, including older adults that may face
isolation?
Released December 2016 1 Communities for a Lifetime City Profile 1Apple Valley, Minnesota 1 23
AGE -FRIENDLY POLICIES
ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT POLICY
An accessory dwelling unit (ADU) — also known as a "granny flat," "mother-in-law apartment" or
"carriage house" — is a self-contained living unit that can be located within the walls of an existing
or newly constructed home, or that can be an addition to an existing home. It can also be a
freestanding structure on the same lot as the main house. ADUs have received significant attention
in recent years as a way to provide more flexible housing options using existing housing stock.
Over the past few decades, municipalities across the country have adopted standards to allow or
encourage the construction of ADUs.
Accessory Dwelling Unit Policy: Yes/No?
Yes
Some Policy Details
Apple Valle does have an Accessory Dwelling Unit Policy.
• Ordinance effective: June 2003.
• Zones/Lot Size: Zone R-1, with a minimum lot size of 40,000 square feet.
• Regulation: Conditional use permit; only if no adverse impact on adjacent properties.
• Occupancy: Maximum of 3.
• Property owner occupancy: must be owner's legal residence; owner may live in primary residence
or ADU; must reside in the property no less than 180 consecutive days per year.
• Development conditions:
- Only 1 ADU per lot; in most cases, must be within or attached to the primary residence.
- Garage conversions are allowed only if lot space is available for two -car garage without variance.
- The ADU must be owned by the owner of the primary residence.
- Not permitted if 3 ADUs are within 1/2 -mile radius.
- Home-based businesses are allowed in the primary residence or ADU, but not both.
- ADU must comply with all building codes and city ordinances.
• Building Area Ratio: A maximum of 35% of lot, for primary residence, ADU and paved surfaces.
• ADU size: No more than 40% of the primary residence's footprint, but no less than 300 sq. ft.
• Design — exterior features:
- Consistent with primary residence design, style, and appearance
- If exceeds primary residence height, must be consistent with the roof pitch, building exterior.
- Entrance - not visible as you view the entrance to the primary residence.
• Design - interior features: Maximum of 2 bedrooms; reasonable deviation from city code to install
accessibility features is allowed.
• Parking: 2 off-street spaces for ADU, plus 2 for primary residence.
• Utilities: Primary residence and ADU must be connected to city sewer and water.
• Number of ADUs currently in permitted in Apple Valley: 3
For more information on ADUs:
AARP, Accessory Dwelling Units, Model State Act and Local Ordinance
http://assets.aarp.org/rgcenter/consume/d17158 dwell.pdf
For sample, downloadable language, see Model Code for Accessory Dwelling Units
https://accessorydwellings.org/2014/11 /25/model-code-for-accessory-dwelling-units
Released December 2016 1 Communities for a Lifetime City Profile 1 Apple Valley, Minnesota 1 24
Dakota County cities with ADU policies for consideration:
• Apple Valley, Code of Ordinances: http://www.ci.apple-valley.mn.us/index.aspx?NID=357
• Eagan, Municipal Code:
http://www.cityofeagan.com/index. php/planning-zoning/city-code-enforcement
• Inver Grove Heights: Amendment: Title 10, Chapter 18: http://www.ci.inver-grove-heights.mn.us
Source: Apple Valley, MN Code of Ordinances, http://www.ci.apple-valley.mn.us/index.aspx?NID=357
ADUs ordinances are often driven by requests from homeowners. What drove the development of
Apple Valley's ADU policy? Could Apple Valley's ADU policy be updated or improved to allow
wider usage by increasing numbers of aging residents or those that have aging parents?
For example: Could the ordinance be updated to allow ADUs on smaller lots, or to
encourage accessibility and Universal Design in the construction of the units?
Released December 2016 1 Communities for a Lifetime City Profile 1Apple Valley, Minnesota 1 25
COMPLETE STREETS POLICY
"Complete streets" is an approach to road planning and design that considers and balances the
needs of all transportation users. It is about improving the basics the transportation system's
safety and functionality for all users but in many cases, also making transit ways more
aesthetically pleasing. Its main premise is for people to get around safely and efficiently from point
A to point B, using whatever mode of travel they choose. The complete streets approach helps to
maximize the use of public roadways and right-of-way in order to provide a comprehensive and
connected multimodal transportation system.
A recent study comparing the United States with Germany and the Netherlands, where Complete
Streets are common, found that when compared per mile/kilometer traveled, bicyclist and
pedestrian death rates are two to six times higher in the United States. Complete Streets therefore
improve safety for all users. According to an international study, as the number and portion of
people bicycling and walking increases, deaths and injuries decline. This is known as the safety in
numbers hypothesis: more people walking and biking reduces the risk per trip.
Complete Streets Policy: Yes/No?
Yes*
Some Policy Details
Apple Valley does have a similar concept to Complete Streets called `Great Streets.'
"Great Streets" Concept
The Vision chapter of the Apple Valley Comprehensive Plan states that the City should be a place of
"great streets". A great street extends beyond the street surface to the sidewalks and landscaping in the
adjacent right-of-way. A great street provides for the safe and efficient movement of vehicles while
encouraging travel by bicycles and pedestrians. A great street supports and enhances land use. A great
street adds to the quality of life and identity of Apple Valley. The street system should be designed to
avoid unintended traffic patterns and volumes. Therefore, the City will consider the "great streets"
concept when planning future improvements to transportation corridors such as CSAH 23 (Cedar
Avenue), CSAH 42, and the Downtown Ring Route. (Chapter 8 — Transportation, 8-15)
The City will encourage a range of Travel Demand Management (TDM) techniques in conjunction with
the development review process to foster multi -modal responses that utilize resources effectively and
minimize congestion. Facilities that accommodate the use of transit, bicycle and pedestrian travel will be
included in all developments, as appropriate. Local streets will be designed to accommodate uses in a
manner that reinforces neighborhood cohesion but does not burden other neighborhoods. For example,
developers will be encouraged to design winding through -streets of the minimum width necessary to
safely accommodate cars and pedestrians, and cul-de-sacs will be discouraged, unless needed to save
significant natural resources or reduce access conflicts. (Land Use, 4-7)
Opportunities: While the city aims to consider the "great streets" concept when planning future
improvements to transportation corridors, Apple Valley's policy on Great Streets is not yet fully developed.
The vision and characteristics for Great Streets is articulated only generally and briefly in the city's
Comprehensive Plan. How has the concept of Great Streets yielded concrete results in Apple Valley?
How could Apple Valley's Great Streets vision be implemented more boldly? How could funding for Great
Streets (or Complete Streets) projects be increased through increased inter -government coordination or
public-private partnerships?
Released December 2016 1 Communities for a Lifetime City Profile 1 Apple Valley, Minnesota 1 26
An ideal Complete Streets policy:
• Includes a vision for how and why the community wants to complete its streets
• Specifies that all users' includes pedestrians, bicyclists and transit passengers of all ages and
abilities, as well as trucks, buses and automobiles.
• Applies to both new and retrofit projects, including design, planning, maintenance, and operations,
for the entire right of way...
For more details on an ideal policy, go to:
http://www.smartgrowthamerica.org/complete-streets/changing-policy/policy-elements
For more information on Complete Streets Policy:
National Complete Streets Coalition, Resources, Fundamentals:
http://www.smartgrowthamerica.org/complete-streets/complete-streets-fundamentals/resources
Dakota County cities with Complete Streets policies:
• Apple Valley's "Great Streets" concept:
nttp://mn-applevalley.civicplus.com/DocumentCenter/Home/View/130
• Eagan's resolution:
http://fresh-energy.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Eagan-Complete-Streets-Resolution.pdf
Source: Apple Valley Comprehensive Plan, http://www.ci.apple-valley.mn.us/index.aspx?NID=191
How can cities realize not just the benefits of safe multi -use streets but also the economic
benefits of bike and pedestrian -friendly Complete Streets? How might funding for Complete
Streets projects be leveraged through increased inter -government coordination or public-
private partnerships?
Released December 2016 1 Communities for a Lifetime City Profile 1Apple Valley, Minnesota 1 27
MIXED-USE (OR SUBURBAN -INTENSITY) LAND POLICY
Mixed land use is a critical component of an aging -friendly community, enhancing mobility and
housing options, and offering several other community benefits all at once. Some are now referring
to mixed use planning occurring in the suburban environment as Suburban -Intensity. The uses
may be mixed vertically (in a common structure) or horizontally (in a common site or area).
By putting a mix of residential, commercial, and recreational uses in close proximity to one another,
alternatives to driving, such as walking or biking, become more attractive. At the same time, a
denser, more sizable population makes public transit more viable. Incorporating multi -unit housing
options into Suburban -Intensity areas provides residents with housing options and often more
accessible and visitable homes.
There are also public health, public safety, and economic benefits to Suburban -Intensity areas.
Compact, walkable neighborhoods encourage more physical activity, with residents walking rather
than driving to their destinations. And with more people and eyes on the street, people feel safer.
Economic benefits include: rising property values, increasing local tax receipts, and increased foot -
traffic for local businesses.
Mixed -Use Land Policy: Yes/No?
Yes
Some Policy Details
Apple Valley does have a Mixed -Use Land Policy.
Mixed Use (MU)
Mixed use areas contain a mix of retail and service business, office, institutional, medium and higher
density residential, public uses and/or park and recreation uses. The uses may be mixed vertically (in a
common structure) or horizontally (in a common site or area). Among the objectives for Mixed Use areas
are:
• Organize land use in a compact and walkable environment.
• Set standards for private development and public improvements that produce enduring quality and
enhance the character and identity of Apple Valley.
• Encourage parking strategies that support greater intensity of use.
• Integrate green/open space and trails into Mixed Use areas.
• Improve environmental conditions, such as water quality and energy use, through development
incentives.
• Connect Mixed Use areas to public facilities, including transit systems, and to the broader
community.
Mixed Use will be implemented through PD zoning. The City will also use design standards and other
land use controls to achieve the desired outcomes. At the present time, the Central Village, Apple Valley
Transit Station, former Apple Valley Transit Station, and a small portion of Cobblestone Lake are
designated Mixed Use. It is anticipated that Mixed Use may be applied in the future to other parts of
Downtown to facilitate redevelopment. (Land Use, 4-24)
Released December 2016 1 Communities for a Lifetime City Profile 1 Apple Valley, Minnesota 1 28
Opportunities: At the present time, the Central Village, Apple Valley Transit Station, former Apple Valley
Transit Station, and a small portion of Cobblestone Lake are designated as Mixed -Use. It is anticipated
that Suburban -Intensity may be applied in the future to other parts of Downtown to facilitate
redevelopment. How might successful mixed-use redevelopment projects be highlighted to build
momentum and support for a mixed-use land policy?
For more information on Mixed -Use Land Policy:
American Planning Association, Quick Notes, Zoning for Mixed Uses
https://www.planning.org/pas/quicknotes/pdf/QN6.pdf
Dakota County cities with Mixed -Use policies:
• Apple Valley, Mixed Use (MU), 2030 Comprehensive Plan, Land Use (pg. 4-24)
http://mn-applevalley.civicplus.com/DocumentCenter/Home/View/581
• Mendota Heights: Mixed Use — Planned Unit Development (pg. 44)
http://www. mendota-heights.com/vertical/sites/%7BAOFB05B5-4CF8-4485-84AA-
0C48DOBC98D7%7D/uploads/%7B604CF49D-F816-4882-A644-012E69A2AF23%7D. PDF
• West St. Paul: Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Guide Plan, June 2009 (pg. 54)
http://wspmn.gov/DocumentCenter/View/118
• Burnsville: MIX Mixed Use District (Title 10 -Zoning, Chapter 22C)
http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/index.php?book id=468
• South St. Paul: SSP/2030 South St. Paul Comprehensive Plan (pg. 69)
http://www.southstpaul.org/DocumentCenter/View/526
Source: Apple Valley Comprehensive Plan, http://www.ci.apple-valley.mn.us/index.aspx?NID=191; Apple Valley, MN Code of
Ordinances, http://www.ci.apple-valley.mn.us/index.aspx?NID=357
The challenge in any city is balancing what the community wants and needs with what the market
is demanding at the time and what developers are willing to build. How can Burnsville increase
the number of mixed use developments that combine residential, retail, and commercial
uses to increase housing and shopping options, and walkability for the benefit of all
residents? What specific policies could the city implement to ensure that mixed-use
designations are continually incorporated into future land use planning?
Released December 2016 1 Communities for a Lifetime City Profile 1Apple Valley, Minnesota 1 29
BIKE WALK POLICY
Bike walk policies focus on the safe, convenient, and enjoyable mobility of pedestrians, bicyclists,
and people with disabilities who use assistive devices. These policies have much in common with
Complete Streets policies, but focus more squarely on the needs and experience of pedestrians
and non -motorized vehicles. Communities that have a bike walk policy or plan demonstrate that
they place a high priority on planning methods and policies that favor alternative modes of travel. It
also demonstrates a community's commitment to public health and quality of life, two major
benefits of biking and walking.
Bike Pedestrian Plan: Yes/No?
Yes
Some Policy Details
Apple Valley does have a Bike Pedestrian Plan. The principles guiding Apple Valley's plan are:
• Enhance opportunities for Apple Valley residents and workers to live more active lives by
reducing barriers to walking and bicycling, and by introducing features that encourage use of trails
and sidewalks.
• Enhance the safety, convenience, and attractiveness of walking and biking for children,
especially as they travel to and from schools and parks and recreation facilities.
• Integrate walking and bicycling more directly into the patterns of land use in Apple Valley by
designing sites and buildings that facilitate connections between neighborhoods, parks, business
areas, regional destinations and walking and bicycling facilities.
• Improve multi -modal access for the Downtown to enhance its economic development
potential.
• Allow Apple Valley to evolve as a suburban and suburban -intensified, walkable place that
retains the character of both environments to create a diverse, sustainable, and interesting
community.
• Encourage connectivity across modes in Apple Valley through systems that promote walking
and bicycling, and offer convenient and comfortable alternatives to movement by automobiles.
• Enhance trails and sidewalks in the community with elements that aid in navigation, build a
greater sense of community, and establish a sense of place in Apple Valley corridors,
neighborhoods, districts, and common spaces.
• Commit to levels of maintenance required to support a safe, convenient, and comprehensive
system of non -motorized transportation in Apple Valley.
• Establish a closer match between capital funding to construct trails and sidewalks and
maintenance/repair/replacement funds to sustain a long-term implementation of a "Complete
Streets" policy.
For more information on Bike Pedestrian Plans:
U.S. Department of Transportation, Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Planning Guidance
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/bicycle pedestrian/guidance/inter.cfm
Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center, Sample Plans, see Local/County Plans
http://www.pedbikeinfo.org/planning/sample plans.cfm
Released December 2016 1 Communities for a Lifetime City Profile 1 Apple Valley, Minnesota 1 30
Dakota County cities with Bike Pedestrian plans:
• South St. Paul: http://www.southstpaul.org/DocumentCenter/View/1039
• Apple Valley: http://www.ci.apple-valley.mn.us/DocumentCenter/Home/View/327
• West St. Paul: http://wspmn.gov/DocumentCenter/View/114
• Rosemount: http://ci.rosemount.mn.us/index.aspx?NID=452
Source: Bike Walk Apple Valley, http://www.ci.apple-valley.mn.us/DocumentCenter/Home/View/327
Two critical issues that are often overlooked in bike walk policies and plans are safe intersection
crossings and the infrastructure needs of persons with physical disabilities who use assistive
devices. Safe crossings are critical for people of all ages, from parents pushing strollers, to older
residents using walkers. The installation of audible and visual countdown timers at intersections is
an effective feature for many users. How is Apple Valley addressing the need for safe street
crossings as a part of system connectivity? And are assistive devices well -supported by
the current pedestrian infrastructure and maintenance program?
Released December 2016 1 Communities for a Lifetime City Profile 1Apple Valley, Minnesota 1 31
Public Health
Prevent. Promote. Protect.
TO LIFELONG SUPPORT
Communities for a Lifetime Initiative
Apple Valley CFL City Profile Overview,
Sep, 6, 2017
Jess Luce
Public Health, Program Manager
Dakota Ce '' i aging
trY
• In 2010, 39,816 people were age 65 and older
• 2010 to 2020: people age 65 and older in Dakota
County is projected to nearly double
2010 to 2030: people age 65 and older in Dakota
County is projected to more than triple
Source: Minnesota Department of Human Services
ommunities For a Lifetime
Good places to grow up and grow older
A community planning framework, a philosophy of
inclusiveness; plan for needs of older adults can benefit
all age groups... (curb cuts)
Healthy, active, successful residents yield economic &
social benefits for whole community
• CFL resonates with more people; more people benefit!
What mai. .viunity for a Lifer
Transportation options to help keep people mobile and
independent
Waikability: sidewalks and paths that are walkable for
transport and exercise
A full range of affordable housing options as needs change
Accessible and quality services that support older adults and
caregivers in home and community settings
Flexible and supportive employment and volunteer
opportunities, including intergenerational activities
• Effective technology to connect people and help with life's
activities
• Access to affordable healthcare and adequate caregiver
supports
All of us benefit froi
rmiT
J■
• If cities want to keep their residents, they will have to become more
"Age -Friendly"
• All of us can benefit from more walkable, bikeable communities
that offer more transit and affordable housing options, more green
space/parks, and opportunities to exercise and engage with their
community...
• As people age, CFL become even more essential to living a vial,
active, and healthy life. Life becomes more localized as we become
less mobile!
CFL Pb:ves and ro
Increased awareness of demographic
changes
Engage in active planning and activities
Build best practice models, pilots,
community projects
Workgroups
Hastings Boomer Advisory Council: supporting community edu.
activities for older adults/boomers; Hastings LOOP Circulator Bus
(2016)
Mendota Heights Active Adults group: newsletter, connecting active
adults to social activities, programing in Mendota Heights
Living Longer & Stronger in West St. Paul: Resource Directory for
Older Adults; LOOP Circulator Bus, Survey of Older Adults (2017)
Apple Valley Education & Service Committee: Hayes Senior Center
held forum on community resiliency, including CFL
Eagan Forward: Amenities for Boomer and Millennials group made
recommendations to the city on mixed-use development, housing,
bikeability; met with Vikings about training facility
Cl L City 1 files
• Completed in Dec. 2016 for all 11 major cities
• Show where a city stands, compares to neighbors
- Highlight Age -Friendly community indicators
• Inform Comprehensive Planning process; make case!
Shared final profiles with city staff; overview for council
work sessions
Next steps: sharing profiles with key leaders/residents;
presenting to civic clubs; developing checklist to
evaluate impact
CFL City Profile rnntr tS page
Population — page
Ov'.aII Livability —raci.e a
LIcc
I
r. 11 i . LI1 -1
Age _
11.
2U11
�� L1��a1�111 11��I�x
ui.!1 le L 100,
:74. -
Hitu.isiiiq
I Ic int 1_`•A-ntri. I_:... —
Upending :J1 do or More.
Ili ;111=4.
1- ent!r
'.i1}!I-I.II I -I :_11.I'
11. . ii1
or Priori.
I: iicIi ..:I HenaI! per
1X111 1-'eopl& Acj& f Li. 11
I Ic uiIIIq 1-'trt.rmeince
'_corp in 2UUL 2U1L.
27'.
'713-L
:74. -
17
77
Assisted LIQ.111 1 Units
Iyer 1 LIL H!'pIe z.cie
86—
FAennoir. 1_ are I_1r.its per
11111 H!'pIe A -!I' U...-1-
Non- Uingle I air.iI .
I I.rn.i ir. LI1 J_
I loin.! - .Ith '_ Ingle
Le, -' I Liy in!I 1_ ptic'n
ill 201
11-. ; n i r1
I" rirJlLIu
n .:304.
:74. -
Mobility - is i-9 -�
Annuli! HlhJ:Ir:I.fIrl
Trr51.:;1.nn rirlrtili
11 iuLILI-uLI1
II I k FA".. ris 11..7111 E
7
F'll�r!r~J-L�r! Arr!rl
:r.11 -,IIA Sr_r.rr: I.7ily E
7
rr:rr•r-:I�r rtirrrr:r: r:� •.•Ir
r -.r Tnill:; Ii .
Cail5., Fi.'''l I '.!uL'.
pial.Iii- T....:.iil
DuLi1 0! GL!L!1
T....:.iil
V'_'Ii..41 11.1:11:11 G1 ivui
rimu.... iii iiiri
Ti aIIii CI a'I i''' pui
1 .1"11"11"1 P1:111111: R
11-. ; n i r1
I" rirJlLIu
n .:304.
ii. 2U14
Il.!'S
Land Ui
—
1 1 iJltiLi 1 1:1 Land
Palk. Lai ILI
NI. miIDtr or Liroce-r-
'tore in Mil&
7r11 n
11-. ; n i r1
I" rirJlLIu
n .:304.
-19.813,.-.
Il.!'S
CoiiuuunityLife
rI r= -
F1rJJ[! . • 1
Asir: i.S l
Ir. Lal�c'r r c'r.. In 2014
Aj `FILAJ
A. i:i 6S i
Vol u ri tee r 11 rs.Ire .Ione In 14
134,393
20%
1 1 -in nor Iii '.rlinr:
1010 ro 2011
23.7%
A-Frii!&ntIIy
- page 24
Acc. ii.r=, Li-.-tl111 iq
Policy
TZ.=Lni plete L4treets
Fr.I 1 ij
¥[=!,-;"
Mixed Use Lein
Lie....elopment 1��I1c
tVW I 1*r
Y E= N
X11 L -1'.-1 I I I_.L: 1 IIc.. IJ uvup.eir2anyi 1 hum 2012 X11 i112 L: I. 1x11 1.1,01 :r_. 1-1 .
0 = P,A_L L IVABILITY
II -1E RP L ILITT 1HD EX
T1-11 IrEe: is a ci-[::a D=1tD01:1131 a 11 o.'., 1.1s e -s -.o magsurethe cverall 11V2 b Way Dr
counli 9 3 or a3 Di] on 4C netrics anC 20 public
del fled lasitieAqiFs FuLlic 1: Iri'ii1i.t Th 40 rrea$ures 1---aDilit:acil 1
Dolicy• a re cl %lied into sever rr ajor cate ;Dric hc nein)borlopd. Emr porta:ID-1.
Dmircnment I1IiI.I. er gage Tent nII1 Opp:cluri7;. Te tool a n 1c :-.Dmpre the re3J1t3
;wirier' rpm 7-1 un ty with °the' CO -1) Tr untins.fl cl ng notic n 1 1 pac Er3 in livnt Hite. 'IOC is ti'
iighe3-.po33 ble Eccre in ea:icEtagorif Scor.3- -bove hDLild be cois dered
ani cor:.. 3elowl) 50. below -ave -age.
''AFF .LE" : SfORES FOR AF PLE VALIEr15,N0 SELCTPEEL IT] ES ; 0 TO - 00
Categ cry
Apple Valleiji
Burnsville
Eagan
Lzkewi Ile MI n ne:gata
T :'to 1 Score
59
59
5-
53 GO
Housing
IS
31
47
41 58
I. -lei g h bo -hood
59
130
53
55 52
1-LanE.p ortali on
52
-26.
47 59
Eivi 1-017111en1
58
55
60
66 62
Healti
66
.35
GI
ek5 GO
Eigagern enl
V
30
53
53 67
Opp° al, ni-...,
71
119
61
77 62
211 I
ir
'
POPULATION
AGIrIG OF TI -IE F TIOT el
ThP r:Ar::: ri n rn DI=H-IRmtlrin E-:!-;rn .n -I R46 n 1 P.1-14 . iII tri Fin rRprp:Rentn n I 9 rg
1:errentae c4 the 1:1:=1:Lilation..A.s tl-iey age. niarryEloorrierslovill reii-iain inthe
1.-;111P9 that rer.nonl7R And rPnrirrirl prinIt1.1=!LAr tl-ii=! aping rinpuloatIrin
Lly imikiLl; NHL! 1...11c1NilEIN IA LI iuji uldroi iri
doing 90 : will attract yeLinger age group3 that lAesnt iTi iqe-trIeridI;'ci::rrirr1LInrty.
Ponri 111 ATIEV-invAr; r rrw /vim 1 1 N7 r1 -I4
L "-
Eicemers iri 2E514
7.0%8.736
U.Y1-X0
4 15_%
cpP z7j.,<D1 ..r.;116P _ 4:1
1L-5
r1j5
.114Epe. 1 1 p i tn the- rim".
Sour: 20 1 1-1tD 14 Affl Girlean C °mini LIFIFF,r 5 unosif frabha 50 L=1
In 71114 1 l.l Tid riIrhr 1 1nm/ever. t1-11:4 a opflrr.IiriWIII grrow
si_iLakiiiLkillyovEir Li riki.x.L 20 FriluiriL:oisurikurriud-i Lkuurriui
boonTerage qrour. 2L114)represents n-iore than a quarter ottheApple'dallei-epopulalion (25A
ur LI i. uuui
they've been Iiiri' in. rt not tile verysame home. Is Apple Valley prepared tor Uchchn-he r-3 to. ag-e
ili Likicui 6IL uurininulity?
f .1 2014 1V.1 k)PI1Y 1 CD.' 17t.7 C)P Aeilner eplaar .1i -410 -Lc
(age CO -11 s aid their c COD aoniry is doing earDipah ro prepare for rhe
ti9uPpc-St TF1:?F growing .96Fincit pp o NAM-Dn.
HOUSING
OVERALL H SING PERFORMANCE
INDICATOR.: HIGH OF,' INCREASING ANNU.AL HousING PERFORr...1.E.NOE SCORE
The Metropolitan Council rate s Twin Citiej. area communfti es to promote effecti..,:e housing
development and -to ma ke fun ding decisions for local housing projects. Each comr-nunftys score is
based on the following broad criteria: (a) Increased housing variety, (LI) Housing cost, (c) Mixed
land uses: (d) Increased trans portation choices. and Leverage of private investment. [1
200o-20-15 Average Housing Perrormance Scores Tr SelectOalcota County Cities. 0 to -100
-HO
90
80
70
150
50
4-0
30
20
10
0
86 93
N -Q
46).
ff
74 74 72
68 6.7
4
-..„)... ...1::.
.-...c''' .
.-q...
oi
Vr .2
4F
..:,..ko•
For .ffesixik p GiLdethez for F.riaritv Flikr)f.n for Hoixsuaq PerfarniErne
SoLrcEr: Metrorolftart foumil Hem irg Perforrnamm
4.1+
r,2X-ZD.- 5.
Hu 7-; HG F ::i PLE'.A.I LrrY
I•JDICA.r:R.: SFEJflIH 3C%OLESS OF HOUSEHO_D INCOME c•• HLI:INJ G
TIi ure I
ir':' rrJ'iL'i It,' wti ttir 'i ti ':' 1] 11':' Id 1 iL'o'.' ':' r b 1 :. tti T.'1!dI : ri H ': 1] li 1: 1': 1 i :1: m .a ra
ojrrirriijriib.. Iri mostcon-nunities the co=t cf ri:;I ho_ sink is Dz g -eater concern than .';rr-
TJOJJI e '1
horri e —rririy ricire renters pa' ri :ire -ort7eirl7ousiig Es a pe.ri::e ri1ic of fliei 1 irioJrri e -
His r: Lsias FE-.. F\TT_F ':3osE FORHOF.-1EGtEF6.NDRENffERStt ir. 2014
271;4
Oma` ... W\. N
Y
2%
67%
3' 96
1 � I
App. Iiirc Ilei roe Eii Iota CQu ily m'ijIe App R ante rs
%Allem tliners
.2
.. ah 1
C.i'vrt
CMciCa�npu6ad •�_. irk I�:ih�3C4; ■Psrirg 3+l?fioVora
SoirDe: Z:17i-X14. Cornm Lir SuroeitTable 625Mand
;fir
OLS1‘-.IG CHCCE
INDICATOR.: INCREAEEE VAR OF HOUSING BEreo ND SINGLE-FAMILY HON ES
IN person's Nusing needs and p-efHences eleoNe throughnittheir life. 1-1R15-ing ...ariet. including
thc cost and features of 10MES: llowpeople 10 cro:..-upand ge in the same conirrunft?'.
Communtt esthat Ick housinD vwesithat desimble !Dicer resicerts Tri;"Ine those resident
to other commulities within the county or elsewhere.
PERCE NITA6 E OF NONI-SIE FALII LI HDIVE BY TYPE II. __E 1 0 0 iv2n 14
ii ®eCi
• 1- h o ni es (s n g e mi ly
attached)
1=0 uplexi Triplex a nd OUEd
• 4u tit m ly R U rtala C 3 fld [LE (5
units
olaiutdurccl Hone
1 930 :20 0) 20-10 21:115
17% .,4% 27% .3?:;.. -0
-1% -1% -1 3eci -1D,3
9% '0% 'F.% 18;e0
5`41
Sour U .S. cereus iSOD, ), 20•10, arid 2.5'15 C:ou Hum 1A-oax. , T.15.
4- —
D;RC;111TOF S'REFIS E "'AKE C F_gB IL 21_ e 5
IX%
X%
pipe viley
31%
W6918 YIN ]iiia
te Elm ire defi ler:A- ciat5.
alica nom Flb5i inDEAD:riai Dk ix41115
11-
rui d
Nwri.r..rL
TIVa
Lakpi 111
A3p1025 -E yro-oNbhi to Hs -S or -.1L r1K3UFB.11- -_:711- 11.)E EceE ds El -1E
T.LE -aC pE-ceitac SiC ?NM ceierage --oil- P. najc-ciliesir 7a)leity..4
11e',' :lc alqs recewlop5 Iar iv hcrof m [211 the cti IS ie 5 Irian
Ora sirL-AL 76?
WALKA ILITY
1 N DI CATO R.: WALK SRE, TO I 00
all-inc... or rolling using an assi.5tive device, the mort basic and affordable iii o de cif
tr-nsp o rt. -non. Ho,=tire,rer. since m ny sire ets(2 peg re ciesigneci prIrn2rIIytorcIr. a lfterg rn2y
fine #17e ciestin ati on too gre at and the routes a nsAf ',0.1aI1.: Scores r-ri e 1.arg the
a Ilttiability of an are a uoing dig its I m a pa an d data abouIditrice'Io comm ars ;.9 rr7 en itie3 a rid
City-WU-IR
liota ik S L.! nrp..
_ z
N, 1 '5 J rd S
Walk Score
PE1-1 00 f 1 Walker -9 1 'arari i 9e- 1 rairly errr9rrrki cin rrnf r�m .ure a ca.(
70-891leryr�,�la14�a1=�lE: Most er-r-ar-rc1s can be acc,�la�pl'i.shec� on {mot
50-89 Sur rievid FiaL Wal ft. dble.€�M� errIrlclS7 C.:�r1 be r& cm fcx1i
25 '19 Car Depenclent: Most errands require a car
0 21 far Dependent: Almost all errands require a car
111.1 al k e r s. Farad i s. e: Daey PITEiffIdg
110 fliDt feCti r..
c_: com a Dr! r -9r
t -ulr arid& t dI' Liv tiusiLuIn iig
Immfrt. d L:tfr
rccrukc 42 car
25-49
0-24
e MIK atil e: erste- -- :
Su rr I midi u.L Vial ULLA a .
r -[yup eri icr 11. Wu e4
-D p cr : Abrioatai
2 1
70
=.I k c.r_=.Gari P.1r-.I.' r . I _ aDtc 31, 2016
Ci"Wide
Walk C01�
31
Burnsville
PFkWay &
�l'coital
Avian uti
Walk Score
68
PE1-1 00 f 1 Walker -9 1 'arari i 9e- 1 rairly errr9rrrki cin rrnf r�m .ure a ca.(
70-891leryr�,�la14�a1=�lE: Most er-r-ar-rc1s can be acc,�la�pl'i.shec� on {mot
50-89 Sur rievid FiaL Wal ft. dble.€�M� errIrlclS7 C.:�r1 be r& cm fcx1i
25 '19 Car Depenclent: Most errands require a car
0 21 far Dependent: Almost all errands require a car
Source: 11ttps:l www. a I Decor.. co r r1MIr..l lAu rns,i IIG, Retrieved on October j-1. 2U 1 ti
City -Wide
Walk Score
21
Cedsr Grove
Walk Score
43
9-100 WaIker's Parads e
70-89 Very Walkable: Most + rrartd G
50-69 Somewhat Waik abl er Some errands can
25-49 Car -Dep en d Cert . Most errands rogUir0s Ceir
24 t o errors a car
OF7
City -Wide
Welk Score
14
k ovine
Ik SC0110
44
50-69
26-49
0-24
Son'ewhst We
Cas -Dep enderrt
Car -Oe p er € :
srarra' ds can be OCCOMphS
me orranctS COO tet clone
*lost rrs rewire a car
Abnos t all errands r.equire a car
LviNc ALc:'NE
ko
crrc'R: rfR:;Er•JT DF FEC'rtf 6.J+ Li.1HC LCN=
!oriE! c'p e Ii'.'e Ic're 'drill are o:rileri: "atitieir i::iri::jr'istri::e. _loihi'e.rr. :iEci3Ie'..no la alp le
teri'l to hr.re e»ircoma. -indastiev`irddffcutt]remanr-ubb.scceas$e-vices
�ntlstG;.fl'.CI'.Ed iritiE Iif i:i:Ti i::i:inr'lLrit'1'. Ci::rrirrii.nh1ie. ried :i:i a..'are :iftiis eriEri1 o`
the �c�.ula-ion and L e1'r h pe tcpririLnit{ennron -nertto supporkthese rcsicen-s.
.. E 5E CIIER. _P.11:= 2OO1.'.i'C2i4
213.a
231)-3
2 1 ri
7%
A.pIi= 11y200 ]
?xi le V3 I v201 4
31 es F na les
&W": NrErc-irrComm unity StrwBi 1Tabh 113c:er KIC fTaLk F:-
EF'rt
Courte201#
A2E-FRI EN.] DL( FOLICIES
Ac;c:ESvOP,'f EJ !/ ELLI [•.J (j UNIT FOLIC
•
.Ari accessory d'.'ieIIiri unit (AD�:: — also known as a -grannyflatf Tr7other-in-lawapartment or
-carriage I1OLISE! is a self-contained Ii'.'inci unitthat can be Ioc:ated within tile walls of an existing
or new1i constructed home. or that can be an addition to an existing home. It can also be
fry estanding structure on the same Int as the main house. ADlls have recehied significant attention
in recent::fears as a .,_va:e• to provide more flexible Iif:LIS1flQ options using existing housing stock.
the past f dec:ai]es. municipalities Llcl L:ss the cL: u 1 1 `1 i• Iia.ie adopted standards Lo L7 I I o eA, or
en courage the construction of .x.DUs.
.Accessory Dwelling Unit Policy: YesNo?
Yes
Some Policy Detalis
.�� p I e Valle does ii a v e an Accessory O..1..ei I ing Unit Pi:' I ice{.
➢ Accessory Dwelling Unit Policy
➢ Complete Streets Policy
➢ Mixed -Use Land Policy
➢ Bike Walk Policy
Dakota County fonnmunities for a Lifetinne Initiative
What Cities and Counties Can Do to Create Age-Frienc
ly Communities
e es-
otential
- - -- - --
--
Recommendalions
Partners
Flousing
(For more info,
see CP_ City
Profhes, pg. .5)
Affprdable housing options
are limited, forcing some
people to leave their
community. Too many people
are paying :::. 30% of their
income for housing, especially
renters 1.58% of Dakota C.
renters).
• En( oL raga developmerr._ 9f a full
range of housing colons iren:ar
apts., condos: sinffle re,../?..i units,
independent and assis:ed living).
• Offer tax incentives for riew
afforcat le hous ns -lc [ cider acillits
or mixed -age.
•Support pracrts funded through
HUIC Section 202 }-cusing.
• Hot sng cievehpers
i I
•Caws
• Trcide groups
• Dakota fatality
Community
De voroprrient ligerii.y
• Norprofits
lipme and building design is
tzilored to narrow range of
physical abilities, when rnost
people want :0 'age 'r place'
and i r) thei- corr rrni i ty
• Insitute home modification and
repair programs and loan fund.
• EncoLrage and incernivize L niversai
design, 'visit -ability' in rietiv housho.
Enact Accessory Dwelling Unit
policy.
Suburban housing, services
and trarsit are typically riot
mixed o '4%1E11 -coordinated.
• Build Transit-Orierrted
Development 1,TOD'i: hi:L.5'111g wi-th
‘valkable stre.?:s, transit options, ard
easy access to gpocis and services.
• Create partnerships vvith housing
and ervice providers.
Any Quest':
Please advocate for Age -Friendly communities!
Dakota County Public Health Department
Communities for a Lifetime Initiative
Jess Luce
iess.luce@co.dakota.mn.us
651-554-6104
Apple„
ITEM:
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE:
SECTION:
6.B.
September6, 2017
Other Business
Description:
Review of Upcoming Schedule and Other Updates
Staff Contact:
Joan Murphy, Department Assistant
ACTION REQUESTED:
N/A
SUMMARY:
Next Planning Commission Meetings:
Department / Division:
Community Development Department
Wednesday, September 20, 2017 - 7:00 p.m.
• Public hearing applications due by 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday, August 23, 2017
• Site plan, variance applications due by 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday, September 6, 2017
Wednesday, October 4, 2017 - 7:00 p.m.
• Public hearing applications due by 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday, September 6, 2017
• Site plan, variance applications due by 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday, September 20, 2017
Next City Council Meetings:
Thursday, September 14, 2017 - 7:00 p.m.
Thursday, September 28, 2017 - 7:00 p.m.
BACKGROUND:
N/A
BUDGET IMPACT:
N/A