HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/02/2018Apple
V��ey
Meeting Location: Municipal Center
7100 147th Street West
Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124
May 2, 2018
PLANNING COMMISSION TENTATIVE AGENDA
7:00 PM
1. Call to Order
2. Approve Agenda
3. Approve Consent Agenda Items
Consent Agenda Items are considered routine and will be enacted with a
single motion, without discussion, unless a commissioner or citizen requests
to have any item separately considered. It will then be moved to the land
use/action items for consideration.
A. Approve Minutes of April 18, 2018, Regular Meeting
B. Adopt Resolution Finding that the Disposition of City -Owned Property in
Lakeville is Consistent with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan
Location: Along the East Side of Pilot Knob Road and north of 179th
Street West
Petitioner: City of Apple Valley
4. Public Hearings
5. Land Use / Action Items
A. Americlnn & Old Chicago Sign Variance - PC 18-08-V
1. Consideration of a Variance Reducing the Setback from 13' to 7' (6'
Variance) for a Ground Sign
2. Consideration of a Variance Allowing an Off -Premise Ground Sign
Location: 14988 Glazier Ave
Petitioner: Americlnn of Apple Valley
6. Other Business
A. Review of Upcoming Schedule and Other Updates
Next Planning Commission Meeting -Wednesday, May 16, 2018 - 7:00
p
.111.
Next City Council Meeting -Thursday, May 10, 2018 - 7:00 p.m.
2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Schedule:
May 7 - Open House at the Municipal Center - 6:00 p.m.
May 16 -Public Hearing at Planning Commission - 7:00 p.m.
7. Adjourn
Regular meetings are broadcast, live, on Charter Communications Cable Channel
180 and on the City's website at www.cityofapplevalley.org
APPVaIIey
ITEM:
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE:
SECTION:
3.A.
May 2, 2018
Consent Agenda
Description:
Approve Minutes of April 18, 2018, Regular Meeting
Staff Contact:
Joan Murphy, Department Assistant
ACTION REQUESTED:
Approve minutes of regular meeting of April 18, 2018.
Department/ Division:
Community Development Department
SUMMARY:
The minutes of the last regular Planning Commission meeting are attached for your review
and approval.
BACKGROUND:
State statute requires the creation and preservation of meeting minutes which document the
official actions and proceedings of public governing bodies.
BUDGET IMPACT:
N/A
ATTACHMENTS:
Minutes
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
APRIL 18, 2018
1. CALL TO ORDER
The City of Apple Valley Planning Commission meeting was called to order by Chair Melander at
7:00 p.m.
Members Present: Tom Melander, Ken Alwin, Tim Burke, Keith Diekmann, Jodi Kurtz and David
Schindler.
Members Absent: Paul Scanlan.
Staff Present: City Attorney Sharon Hills, City Engineer Brandon Anderson, Community
Development Director Bruce Nordquist, City Planner Tom Lovelace and Department
Assistant Joan Murphy.
2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Chair Melander asked if there were any changes to the agenda.
MOTION: Commissioner Burke moved, seconded by Commissioner Diekmann, approving the
agenda. Ayes - 6 - Nays - 0.
3. CONSENT ITEMS
MOTION: Commissioner Alwin moved, seconded by Commissioner Burke, approving the
minutes of the meeting of April 4, 2018. Ayes - 4 - Nays - 0. Abstained — 2
(Diekmann and Schindler)
MOTION: Commissioner Alwin moved, seconded by Commissioner Burke, adopting
Resolution No. 2018-01 setting a public hearing for May 16, 2018, to receive
comments on the 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update. Ayes - 6 - Nays - 0.
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Appliance Smart Building Conditional Use Permit and Building Addition Site
Plan/Building Permit Authorization — PC08-06-CB
Chair Melander opened the public hearing at 7:02 p.m.
City Planner Tom Lovelace stated the petitioner is requesting the following:
1. Approval of a conditional use permit to allow for a 2,973 -sq. ft. Class II restaurant with
drive-through window service.
2. Site plan/building permit authorization to allow for construction of a 7,087 -sq. ft. addition to
an existing 48,960 -sq. ft. retail building located at 7370 153rd Street West.
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
Dakota County, Minnesota
Planning Commission Minutes
April 18, 2018
Page 2 of 6
The 4.48 -acre lot is located along the south side of 153rd Street West, approximately 1/8 -mile east
of Cedar Avenue. Adjacent uses include Planet Fitness and Cub Foods grocery store to the West,
Office Max to the north, the Dollar Tree store to the east and the MVTA (Minnesota Valley Transit
Authority) bus layover facility to the south. Planet Fitness, Cub and Dollar Tree are designated "C"
(Commercial) on the City's 2030 Comprehensive Land Use Map and "RB" (Retail Business) on the
City's zoning map. The Office Max store is designated "C" (Commercial) and part of the "PD -244"
(Planned Development) zoning district, and the bus layover facility is designated "MIX" (Mixed
Use) and zoned "PD -507".
In 2013, development plans were submitted and approved to allow for construction of a 6,364 -sq. ft.
addition. The proposed addition was expected to be the location of a Class I restaurant that included
a 1,400 -sq. ft. outdoor patio area. Because no building permit was issued within one year of the
approval of the site plan/building permit authorization resolution, the approval lapsed. New plans
have been submitted for a slightly larger building addition at the same location, which will now
include a Class II restaurant with a drive-through window and an additional tenant.
The 2030 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designates the site "C" (Commercial). The proposed
addition and conditional use permit request would be in conformance with the existing map
designation and the goals and policies of the Plan.
The property is currently zoned "RB" (Retail Business). Retail business districts are areas which are
centrally located to serve the need for general retail sales. The current use is a permitted use within
the "RB" zoning district. The applicant is proposing to construct a 7,087 -sq. ft. addition to the
existing 48,960 -sq. ft. multi -tenant retail building, which is occupied by an Appliance Smart,
Becker Furniture and Becker Mattress stores.
The submitted plans indicate a 2,973 -sq. ft. Class II restaurant with drive-through window service in
the proposed addition, with space available for an additional tenant. The "RB" zoning district lists a
Class II restaurant as a conditional use, which is defined a use that is permitted in a particular
zoning district subject to meeting all conditions and standards for the location or operation of the
use.
A Class II restaurant is a conditional use within the "RB" (Retail Business) zoning district.
Conditional uses include those uses generally not suitable in a particular zoning district, but which
may, under some circumstances, be suitable. When the circumstances exist, a conditional use permit
may be granted.
The City may grant a conditional use permit, as the use permit was applied for or in modified form,
if it is determined that the proposed location of the conditional use is in accord with the objectives
of the comprehensive guide plan and the purposes of the district in which the site is located and
would not be materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
The site plan identifies 231 surface parking spaces that will serve the site. The current
Appliance Smart and Becker Furniture and Mattress uses have a demand for a minimum of 68
spaces. The proposed addition could require a minimum of 47 parking spaces. If the uses in the
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
Dakota County, Minnesota
Planning Commission Minutes
April 18, 2018
Page 3 of 6
existing building were to change to a different type of retail operation, the minimum number of
parking spaces would increase significantly.
The applicant is proposing a 500 -sq. ft. patio that will be located adjacent to the restaurant in the
northwest corner. The applicant should identify the number of outdoor seats in the patio area.
The plans do not identify the location of any the building addition's mechanical equipment. All
mechanical equipment shall be screened in accordance with the City's zoning code.
The applicant should provide information on the on-site location of their building material storage
and construction personnel parking areas, and haul routes for material and equipment.
Mr. Lovelace reviewed the grading plan, elevation drawings, trash enclosure location, utility plans,
landscape plans, street classifications, accesses to site, traffic circulation and pedestrian access.
Commissioner Schindler asked what the width of the drive aisle was driving from Planet Fitness or
Cub Foods.
Mr. Lovelace answered there are two 12 -foot wide lanes for 24 feet total.
Commissioner Schindler commented he had no concerns for parking but would rather not see
people walk from the back side of the building. He thought there was enough maneuverability for
deliveries back there.
Mr. Lovelace said he presumes Cub Foods takes goods throughout the day and he did not know
how many trucks go back there. Their staff would receive goods and put product on the shelves and
the delivery trucks could come all day long.
Commissioner Schindler added the ideal situation would be that there would not be a drive-through
and everyone could park on the front end and believes if there is no available parking south of the
building then that would be a good thing.
Mr. Lovelace remarked he would like a response from Cub Foods whether or not this proposed
addition would be a problem to their operation. He would like the applicant to reach out to Cub
Food for an inquiry and provide staff with a response.
Commissioner Schindler added a bigger concern could be how the trucks for Cub Foods have to
back into the dock area and depending on what entrance is used. He felt it would be useful to find
out from Cub Foods what the impact would be.
Mr. Lovelace stated the public hearing notice was sent to Cub's corporate office and not the store
itself. He added it is a big operation and he would like documentation from them. If a restaurant
comes in then the traffic in the entrance to Cub could block traffic to Cub while cars are in the
drive-through lane.
Commissioner Kurtz inquired where the Appliance Smart trucks drive in with all their inventory.
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
Dakota County, Minnesota
Planning Commission Minutes
April 18, 2018
Page 4 of 6
Mr. Lovelace replied at the southwest corner of the building.
Commissioner Kurtz commented that Chick-Fil-A and the other retail building there do not have a
full intersection.
Mr. Lovelace answered that there is a 3/4 access intersection and when they exit they can only take a
right. He added that staff would be reviewing how 153rd Street operates from Galaxie Avenue to
Cedar Avenue if there needs to be some changes made there.
Commissioner Diekmann asked for clarification on the north/south road that separates this project
site and Cub Foods that has a 24 -foot drive aisle and asked if the lot line would presumably be at 12
feet.
Mr. Lovelace said he would need to verify and have that available at the next meeting.
Commissioner Diekmann inquired that while it would be nice if Cub Foods could use that drive
aisle that it is not a requirement for the other owner to keep that there as a condition of this project.
He commented that if this is the property of the new site, they should be able to build on it as they
please as long as there is a drive aisle. He asked if that is the way it works.
Mr. Lovelace said both parties would have to agree to it. He did not know what powers or rights
they have. He said their building does meet the building setback and that a new access off of that
drive aisle would need a cross access agreement.
Commissioner Diekmann inquired about the queuing of possibly six cars and asked if the six cars
was the total between the window and the menu board.
Mr. Lovelace answered that he did not know where the menu board would go and that is the
minimum the City requires.
Commissioner Alwin asked if a bypass lane was required by code.
Mr. Lovelace said no but it is reviewed how traffic functions on a site.
Commissioner Alwin expressed concern for how the drive -up lanes impact traffic flow and said the
design could be modified to make the flow better.
Chair Melander commented Chick-Fil-A, who is busy most of the time, operates smoothly and if
they can do it so can this location. He agreed with Commissioner Schindler about not parking in the
back of the building.
Mr. Lovelace stated the applicant wanted to make the back area safe and lit.
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
Dakota County, Minnesota
Planning Commission Minutes
April 18, 2018
Page 5 of 6
Chair Melander asked where Cub is at this traffic flow and commented that Cub should have made
a call or sent an email if they thought this flow was going to be a problem.
Mr. Lovelace said he would still like to reach out to Cub to see if they are comfortable with the
plan.
Commissioner Schindler inquired if the drive-through lane could be straightened out and not have a
bump out and asked how wide the drive-through lane would be.
Mr. Lovelace said the drive-through lane is 12 feet wide.
Commissioner Schindler asked what the minimum would be with an escape lane.
Mr. Lovelace answered they would be looking at another 10-12 feet.
Tim McLaughlin, Grootwassink Real Estate and representing Seventy -Three Seventy LLC, stated
that most deliveries are at night. He added that as time goes on uses of the property can change.
Right now there is lots of parking.
Commission Schindler inquired what his thoughts were on the drive-through lane.
Mr. McLaughlin answered that signage is a big help.
Commissioner Burke commented traffic will be coming in, cross over the drive-through and then to
leave they have to go north again and added this could be a bottleneck.
Mr. McLaughlin commented that drivers will have to watch for sign and for other cars around them.
Commissioner Burke asked about the placement of menu boards.
Mr. McLaughlin answered that they have not selected a location yet.
Bob Grootwassink, owner of the property, provided additional information.
Commissioner Diekmann asked if there was any reason why this addition to the building would be
connected to the Appliance Smart when you own land all the way out to the street to the north.
Mr. McLaughlin answered that they had looked at that and it comes down to the sight lines to the
building. They want to feed off the traffic from Cub Foods and that intersection and have a
presentable building.
Mr. Grootwassink added that building closer to the street would block the view of the main tenant.
Chair Melander closed the public hearing at 7:48 p.m.
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
Dakota County, Minnesota
Planning Commission Minutes
April 18, 2018
Page 6 of 6
5. LAND USE/ACTION ITEMS
- NONE -
6. OTHER BUSINESS
A. Review of upcoming schedule and other updates.
Community Development Director Bruce Nordquist stated that the next regular Planning
Commission meeting would take place Wednesday, May 2, 2018, at 7:00 p.m.
7. ADJOURNMENT
Hearing no further comments from the Planning Staff or Planning Commission, Chair Melander
asked for a motion to adjourn.
MOTION: Commissioner Alwin moved, seconded by Commissioner Diekmann to adjourn the
meeting at 7:54 p.m. Ayes - 6 - Nays - 0.
Respectfully Submitted,
/s/ Joan Murphy
Joan Murphy, Planning Department Assistant
Approved by the Apple Valley Planning Commission
on
Tom Melander, Chair
Oa
1•••
000
ITEM:
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE:
SECTION:
3.B.
May 2, 2018
Consent Agenda
Description:
Adopt Resolution Finding that the Disposition of City -Owned Property in Lakeville is Consistent
with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan
Staff Contact:
Tom Lovelace, City Planner
Department / Division:
Community Development Department
Applicant:
City of Apple Valley
Applicant Date:
60 Days:
Project Number:
120 Days:
ACTION REQUESTED:
Adopt a resolution finding that the disposition of City -owned property in Lakeville, located
along the east side of Pilot Knob Road and just north of 179th Street West, is consistent with
the 2030 Comprehensive Plan.
SUM MARY:
The City of Apple Dalley owns approximately 20 acres of land within the City of Lakeville
located along the east side of Pilot Knob Road, just north of 179th Street West. This site was
formerly used as a wastewater treatment facility in the 1960's. Subsequent to that the land
has been used as a yard waste compost site and also for crop farming. Currently the site is
vacant and unused.
Residential development is currently underway to the south of this parcel. Plans for
additional residential development immediately west of the parcel are also progressing. The
City has been approached by a developer possibly interested in purchasing all or a portion of
the parcel.
According to Minnesota state statutes, publicly owned land cannot be acquired or disposed
of until the Planning Commission has reviewed the proposal and reported in writing to the
City Council as to the compliance of the proposed action with the Comprehensive Plan.
Although the parcel is not located in the City, it is still property owned by the City
and review by the Planning Commission should be undertaken to ensure that its disposition
meets the goals and policies set forth in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The sale of the
property for future development would meet a goal set forth in the Land Use chapter of the
Plan, which encourages redevelopment when properties are no longer cost-effective to
maintain.
BACKGROUND:
The property was the former site of the Lebanon Township Treatment Works sanitary sewage
treatment facility, which was constructed in 1965. The facility was purchased by
Metropolitan Sewer Board in the 1970's and was demolished in 1980. The property was
conveyed to the City in 1989 and has been used as a yard waste composting facility and for
agricultural crop production.
BUDGET IMPACT:
The City would receive revenue from the sale of the property.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution
Location Map
Location Map
Location Map
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2018 -
RESOLUTION PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES SECTION 462.356
SUBDIVISION 2 FOR THE DISPOSITION OF CITY -OWNED PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF
LAKEVILLE CONFORMANCE TO THE APPLE VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes Section 462.356, Subdivision 2, charges the Planning
Commission with the review of any City action relating to the acquisition or disposal of City owned
interest in real property or the authorization of any capital improvement to determine such action's
compliance with the local Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, The City is considering an action related to said Statute, specifically the
disposal/sale of the property having the Parcel ID Number 22-01200-51-010; and
WHEREAS, Planning Commission review of such action finds that it is consistent with the
goals, policies and implementation procedures of the Apple Valley Comprehensive Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Apple
Valley that the City Council of Apple Valley be advised that the disposal of City -owned property in
the City of Lakeville, as previously identified, is found to be in conformance with the
Comprehensive Plan.
ADOPTED this 2nd day of May, 2018.
Thomas Melander, Chair
TV' OF APPLE VAL
IN LAKEVL
'Y PROPERTY
LOCATION MAP
co
di
CL
CL
AIL ,111
Nor
1.1,1
or4
Pto- 1,
I
11nt
P
•
44 I
it
4
-01
Air
Ltel
Ars
xxx
1117
76
GJCL
e
-tie", 1(
1,?7,1
4!,..
16. 411.1
od4
1,14, :#11
.41
11"
vV
,141
k
r Ltiii
•
j
1
11141P/A;
f I�
W'.
.; „ice
APPVaIIey
ITEM: 5.A.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: May2, 2018
SECTION: Land Use /Action Items
Description:
Americlnn & Old Chicago Sign Variance - PC18-08-V
Staff Contact:
Alex Sharpe, Planner and Economic Dev. Spec.
Department / Division:
Community Development Department
Applicant:
Americlnn Apple Valley
Applicant Date: 3/15/2018
60 Days: 5/14/2018
Project Number:
PCI8-08-V
120 Days: 7/13/2018
ACTION REQUESTED:
The Planning Commission is asked to review the proposal and provide a recommendation to
the City Council subject to the following conditions:
1. The variance shall be applicable to the property legally identified as Lot 1, Block 1,
Apple Valley Commercial Addition.
2. If the sign permit fee is not paid and not issued or within one (1) year of the date of
approval, the variance approval shall lapse.
3. Prior to issuance of the sign permit, the petitioner shall record the variance with Dakota
County and provide evidence to the City.
4. Prior to issuance of the sign permit, the petitioner shall enter into an encroachment
agreement for placement of the sign within the drainage and utility easement.
5. The approved common Signage Plan permits two signs, prior to installation of this sign
one of the existing signs shall be removed.
6. A private utility locate shall be performed prior to any work commencing on the site.
7. Installation shall be generally consistent with the sign plan dated 4-16-18.
SUMMARY:
This item was previously reviewed by the Planning Commission and approved on April 4,
2018. Since that review, the site plan has been amended due to the proposed sign being
placed over a private sewer utility line. The new site plan is attached, as well as the
previously approved site plan for reference.
The new site plan requires a 3' variance, however due to the density of private utilities staff
is recommending up to a 6' variance to allow the applicant to locate an area that will not
conflict with private utilities. A 6' variance is consistent with the previously approved
proposal, but as stated, the location of the approved site plan placed the sign on a private
sewer line. A condition of approval is for all private utilities to be located, when this is
completed the applicant will need to find a suitable location within the 6' variance for the
sign.
The proposed sign is 18.32 sq. ft. and is 6' 10" tall. The applicant is seeking this sign to
allow customers better recognition of the shared entrance driveway to the Americlnn and Old
Chicago. A 10' drainage and utility easement runs along the front property line, which the sign
is proposed to encroach into. Ground signs are required to have a 13' setback from any
property line, but in this case that would place the sign in the parking lot, or too far from the
entrance driveway to provide direction to customers.
A variance to allow off -premise signage is required due to the applicant's desire to share the
sign; between Americlnn and Old Chicago. City Code does not allow for off premise
signage except when in a shopping center, which this development does not qualify as.
Normally, with a variance the "practical difficulties" measure is used. However, in the case
of a sign variance the City Code lays out different standards which are below:
(1) All of the following requirements must be met:
(a) Special conditions exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, building involved
and which are not applicable to other lands, structures or buildings in the same district;
(b) The special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the
applicant;
(c) A literal interpretation of the provisions of these regulations would deprive the
applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district and the
terms of these sign regulations;
(d) That granting the variance requested would not confer on the applicant any special
privilege for a use not common to other lands, structures or buildings in the same
district; and
(e) The proposed use of the property shall have an appearance that will not have an
adverse effect upon adjacent properties and there will be no deterrence to development
of vacant land.
(2) Any proposed signage beyond the maximum square footage permitted would have the
primary function of providing a public service.
Staff is recommending approval of the variances based on the following.
(a) Special conditions exist on the property; the entrance is on a curved roadway, and is
easily missed by customers and the properties act as a development but are not allowed
shared signage by code. The density of private utilities also provides a unique
circumstance where finding the best location for the sign is difficult.
(b) These conditions are not caused by the applicant.
(c) Most developments such as this are permitted shared signage, in this case these two
parcels act as a single development but are not permitted shared signage.
(d) Granting of this variance would not confer any special privilege not common to
other properties.
(e) The proposed sign will not have an adverse appearance and is in fact smaller than
would otherwise be permitted for a ground sign.
BACKGROUND:
A common signage plan between these two sites was previously approved that allowed two
free standing signs on the Americlnn parcel, one along Cedar Ave, and one along CSAR 42.
City Code only allows one ground sign per lot, and as such, staff is recommending that one of
the existing signs be removed to allow installation of this sign without an additional variance.
Staff has been in discussion with the applicant about this and they have stated that they are
comfortable with this condition.
As the sign is proposed closer to Glazier Ave than permitted, staff has evaluated whether the
sign would impede with site -lines for drivers. A diagram is attached that shows the site
triangle for this site is clear, and that the sign will not obstruct the vision of drivers.
Previously, the applicant had proposed the sign be closer to the roadway, but in discussion
with staff moved it further back to allow greater visibility.
BUDGET IMPACT:
N/A
ATTACHMENTS:
Area Map
Exhibit
Survey
Site Plan
Site Plan
Plan Set
Exhibit
Shar
•
e, Alex
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Sharon Hills <SHills@dmshb.com>
Monday, April 30, 2018 10:17 AM
Sharpe, Alex
PC 5A Americlnn Sign Variance
PC 5A Americlnn Sign Variance.pdf
A suggested revision to condition #6 for variance, to read as follows:
6. A private utility locate shall be completed and a site plan or survey depicting the located private
utilities and proposed sign location shall be submitted with the sign permit application. No sign permit will be
issued unless and until a private utility locate is completed and the site plan/survey is provided to the City.
Sharon. K. Hills 1 Attorney 1 www.dmshb.com 1 952.953.8844 direct 1 952.432.3780 fax
14985 Glazier Avenue, Suite 525, Apple Valley, MN 55124 1 Map our Address
Doughert
olenda
Attorneys
Safest, Hills & Bauer P.A.
Notice: Important disclaimers and limitations apply to this email.
Please click here for our disclaimers and limitations.
d
Americlnn and Old Chicago Sign Variance
PROJECT REVIEW
Existing Conditions
Property Location:
14988 Glazier Ave
Legal Description:
Lot 1, Block 1, Apple Valley Commercial Addition
Comprehensive Plan
Designation
C — "Commercial"
Zoning Classification
PD 290 "Planned Development"
Existing Platting
Platted
Current Land Use
Restaurant and Hotel
Size:
1.7 acres
Topography:
Flat
Existing Vegetation
Trees, grass
Other Significant
Natural Features
N/A
Adjacent
Properties/Land Uses
NORTH
Commercial
Comprehensive Plan
C — "Commercial"
Zoning/Land Use
PD 290 "Planned Development"
SOUTH
Commercial
Comprehensive Plan
C — "Commercial"
Zoning/Land Use
PD 244 "Planned Development"
EAST
Commercial
Comprehensive Plan
C — "Commercial"
Zoning/Land Use
PD 290 "Planned Development"
WEST
Commercial
Comprehensive Plan
C — "Commercial"
Zoning/Land Use
RB "Retail Business
11
DENOTES FOUND IRON MONUMENT
uJ
a_
a
zo)
oc`,
cr0)
Nui
w0
w
0
zct
L.L.1 <
C:)
00
BEARING SYSTEM IS ASSUMED
z
6 o- .-
tl
a, • • >, io4 a. u,
•.-, 0 C4J-c 0 c u,
..-i 4-, Z . 0 09
0,9 9.0 <
90.0.4
oo
0 2 ,T,
— ,f, G., c_,1r°,41-',°,,,'_1,'
z 0— 0 C..,
0 0.34 X
;, 8.t'-3000
0) 9 • 3 0069>.
C, a Ei 0 0
. . :4 0 , = , c,: 7 4
4-•
),-.4'-15,49 9
u.,
C7,1Moia, 0 M 7 ,
0 0 ,
.. 000.. .G 0 ...
0. ., 4-1 tr
0-10
C-, 0 1-, a 404-, >... G.li • >,
0.) Z 0 ...>,-, , ul 0 7 0 -,
ro 3 00
4000 0 C 0:
C., a, -,
4-9)00 u,
,r, 0.4.34 01,
0 ro , 4- . 3
..c u ..c
93.400
).4 4 C • ' cc' r o' 'a - ..., 0
R• a :14' ct L,
< 0 --, 0c0 •••-• z •
_72,467",
4_, -0 . 4_, r• ., 0 0
•,-1 rc . S. 4-,
.x 4-, 7 a, 4 1.0. .9 C 0
•••-, C 0 rN cr- c 4.,
C., c }-1 • . . ,
0 0 ,C ., ) or
-u, cult:rocc,-,
,--, •,-• C 4-) c c,
td• •
,C
00 0.040c a, 0 0 Cr
.)9 Z 0o9
0 ,•••7
•,-4 u
C) ;-) g, 8.2
C 9 0,, • 4, '1—, .1-j
g
N93
40
T.` c'
091 'ON dVri 'M'O'N 'ON '00
'MVO '9 13080d JO 3N11 1SV3
00991
M.O.C.00o0OS
00991
091 ON dVil 'OH
'00 'NVO 13021Vd
0028
ON
'0000 1V1083riri00 A311VA 3lddV
'1 >119 101 JO \3N11 1SV3
NIHON 1.9'L
l'o. 0- - c...H.--0,-, a
0.-4,0 0
0-( .0 C.;
.1i)r;O3
',,c . 0_ . , 14
ro 0 u, . <
:-..., t Z C . - o -, -,
,-
sO
ul 04 c;) :.e, C., 7 C • ,
. - CU
04)000
00400 'E:l'iMrTIN
.
•• •,-. F.,',,,,t°,-,
0
4040(0003 0 . cr C..7
'E1+ >,4 0 c (9.t' ,
, 0-'
-4
09 • 3 rc >-• IC;
0 a E. 0 0E-, 06434)9)
0 8t4,_,-, 0
••••• '
ICS
.4 . ,4 0 'C
. 0 1-, 4-, — • .. 0
0 0 4-I
U W 0 rt) 7 4-
.
. 0 c W • A C 4
Z 0,
>, 4-, 0 c a •--,0 Cr C...
•,-, ra 0 •,-1
0,
ci)
CV 0 ▪ C•1
0 0 14. A 4-i 4-
.. .01'-)
. , ...
, ' - i • ._.9- g . ,- c( 1 ) r ac t .
ci• a u ra 0 c ,--, r-.1 u, u, .
0 --.
;„,
CA
2fl ,7,f,,f
—Ntt,-
. ••-+ c cr,
0 ' 2ff9 1.) ,..,
''00»)
. - u, ,•,m9 cZ . ,
. •,-. 0 m .. a, . Cr ET
,--,
,,,, - -F-, ' --. 0-• c; ,,, .,
sO
4-, cc 0 x c 4 • •-, a, r-
;
c ro ii, A 4-, co 4- u: ••
'alit' • ••• 0 4., ,4-. .0
0 •,-, 4-, •,-, cp 4-, c 4-. . 1 •,-,
,4 0. m tr• Gl.. rp . cll r,,
.,,-, 0 al E 9, ..-, • .0 0 •r--,4.,
081 'ON dVVI 'M'0'8 'ON '00
'MVO 1308Vd JO 3Nrl 1SV3
n'901.
V1083M0
P9> ON dOOl 'M'0'8 '08
'00 'MVO '9 13088d
2888£ 3023403408
Z176
A3T1VA 31ddV) >fl '1 101 JO 3M1 103M
-17990
091 "ON dVri 'M'0'8 '08
'00 'MVO '1 13088d
COt
9
c
(afINIaAV va D)
CZ ON AVMHDIH GIV aivIs AIN OD
St.
w L,
b3
roe,
0
m• >
.z
a.
(150TH STREET WEST)
GHWAY NO. 42
COUNTY STATE A
SHERVOSS CO.
APPLE VALLEY, MN.
4.„
00 >, C
0 •
, 0 0 M
4)9)0400- 00034o 0.11
7
• ,-i cr, > CU -•
c
▪ • H 1-4
0 0
0.04)034
L'S
•
„ru, .2
000
004) 39 0
ul
.1, a
090,,
ro •,-1 cr c A 4., .0
c 0 Ocu, u
Cr ,• (3.1 • M
7 0 S.4
U, A rC1 0 ••-,
7, • H
O 34>34 904.0.9
0
• 0 ra
u: '0400)
4-, 0
> (CI A 0 c
• •r--
O 2°,4-'7i,
0 0
0 A, c trcCcw
..c) S, , - r;.07,, 2 7 0
,C3 4- A
• • .c ›,
3 >
> 7 A 0 W Cr/ C/1
0
• • •;, coG
3.•34>.:4.343440
M 4-, •
• •••, 0>>
F.., .000 •
S179998C E91
0
0
N �
�w
A a
z (D
•
w
w
X 1VAOHddV H3WOISflJ
Z r to
O 0
m m
to to
O
zz
>—!
_3
CD
0
9) o
CD
Cu' -0->
0- S a O
rD o o 0 O
o_ N 7+ (D
a, rD r a,
cQ D r U, o_
— rD
D Ln
,..< 3�'n
N O \< N N
5' m (D O
n. n n O r•+
9.1 c —
rD Q tD �
o N (D tn' Q
a,} ] N.
(Q r�-F t D �
a) — S 0-
u r..h O c
CD O (D
Vf r••F a aJ Q
cQ' D O
3 m- o_ c
r+ rt 0 cn
Q
0 -,Q
0- (D
Ocn • O
co c
(D
(D rD =,-
3. � . 3
0 — o
00 c r+
(D o
3 O r rch
rD
n r.
O O' O (D
r13 5 N O
N
�' 0 N
0
Cu
0
v,
3
r••h
rD
CQ
(D
rD
3
cu
z
c
cu
r+
(D
0
0
O
rDF
n
v
m
00
CO
0
cQ:
a)
0
0
rD3
0
rD
rD
S
(D
c
3
r+
(D
0
0 r -r
0
3
0
r••h
rD
(D
O
N
(D
0
s
rD
N
rD
a)
v,
rD
rDx
rD
0
rD
r•h
0
rD
N
LO
N
n
0
a,
r••h
rD
(D
c
r••h
0
r -h
rD
S
1
cOliNTY STATFAID FR`H{ AY NO. 21
iii0A41 AVENUE)
a
. ce.
4It Par? ita
��
11 44
?D. F.
11.01 L BIW'.,:
,7,911. — It
311fi 1.10 F .
y
IMRE
,amu •�,
ICS,. iii • .
y
t
5
■-C
.�r
NOEI H
1
trrII
a is
4.
1
61179 074
u'{9
iNd
41:s4
414 Fr"
\eV"
i351(f(
z
2
m
m
/ 4/
91.-91-17 uBld eT!S MON
S179998C E91
X 1VAOHddV H3WOISflJ
Z r to
O 0
m m
to to
0
zz
> -
3
CD
0
9) o
CD
Cu' -0->
CT S a O
rD o o 0 O
Q r+• rD
a, (D a,
* 3 a, D
CT cQ cin
,..<�' •D • Lnn
N N • NrD
O 5' = O
n nn O r+
9.1 E P -
Cr
fp Q tD �
• (D tn' Q
LC '�-F (D rteC} -
�_ _ ▪ G 0
-1,N' n O C
(D • O (D
Vf r•F a, Q
3 m -o_ c
r+ \ r+
rF r+ O N
Q O -S Q
Q (D
r+
(D `<
O N O
ate, co • c
• n
(D (D
0 - O
7 n rt r+
(D • O * O
• r+ r+
• rt
O O' O (D
713 g N 0
•▪ N
. O - N
r+
0
Cu
O
N
LA3
5'
cQ
rt
rD
L0
(D
rD
0
CU
c
cu
r+
(D
Q
CT
rb
F
n
v
m
00
00
0
cQ:
a,
0
O
r+
rD3
-o
O
rD
rD
S
(D
r-
0-
3 0-
3
(D
Q
0
O
3
O
(D
(D
O
N
(D
0
s
rD
N
rb
crt
a,
rD
S
rD
rbx
rD
-oO
rD
rt
0
rD
N
Ca▪ '
N
n
a,
0_
cu
(D
(D
r
(D
c
O
SrD
cni1NTY sTATFAID FrifilfrwAY Nn.
4 �.: EWA A NUEJ
CD
3 -0
_•
c0
0 TJ
0
3 <.
3 0
(7)•
cn0
0_
S17SS98C E91
n
0
0
ri)o
a_ u..)
a
Z cc.
u,
u,
w
w
X 1VAOHddV H3WOISflJ
Z 1—_n
to
o On
m > m
Y.1 —I to
o
Z Z
02
<cT)
CD
ca o
> l
_=
CD
c4 S-0 p D O
o �' c
rD a' &0O DJ
rD
* 3 = o
0_ <
'.-+ _
= -S N cQ v,
N n5 _3
cQ n
VI`G N C `< L0
O �' S
n nO
n p rD
o N rD in' Q
rD cr < .N -r
�Q r --r N r�-r - rD
r
� cn r+ O .
v, r+ 2. -
r+ r+ 0 v,
Q.... o O
r+ 75 0- rD11,
O g% cam„ `G n
r+
t.0C c
rD �, (D
D (D
r =• Q
-°o
n
rD
o * 0
gccu
3 �.-'� v,
D 5 (D * VI
G. G.
n
O O p (DD c�„
n ra,-r v F
N O rD n0 r1
cr.t.0O N
r+
v
m
N
00
CO
O
c.
CU
0
-S
0
rh
cri
rD
3
O
`G
rD
rD
S
rD
s<
cu
rD
criO
3
r+
r -r
(D
0
O.
s<
C
3
0
r+
n-
rD
O
rD
C
O
crl
rD
0
:-
(D
crl
rD
1
m
v,
a,
rD
r+
S
rD
rD
x
n
C
rD
O
rD
r+
`G
0
0
cri
(!)
tQ
m
criD
2
0
cu
rD
r+
M-
rD
rD
O
r=r
0
r+
:-
(D
a
aanitlN�Is
3WVN 1N11.
30 31V15 3H1 30 SMO`1 3H1213aN11
03SN3�Il AlnO tl WV [ 1tlHl ONtl
NOISI�N3dnS 1J321Ia AW T13aNn il0 3W A8 a32iVd3Tld StlM
3b b0 'NOIlV7I3Ia3dS 'NVId SIHl 1VHl A3I1213� A93213H I
lIfIHX3
b'LOS]NNIIJI 'A]11VA ]lddV JO MID
•••
••.•
.us.
••*•
•••
Apple
ey
ITEM:
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE:
SECTION:
6.A.
May 2, 2018
Other Business
Description:
Review of Upcoming Schedule and Other Updates
Staff Contact:
Joan Murphy, Department Assistant
ACTION REQUESTED:
N/A
SUM MARY:
Next Planning Commission Meetings:
Department/ Division:
Community Development Department
Wednesday, May 16, 2018 - 7:00 p.m.
• Public hearing applications due by 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday, April 18, 2018
• Site plan, variance applications due by 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday, May 2, 2018
Wednesday, June 6, 2018 - 7:00 p.m.
• Public hearing applications due by 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday, May 9, 2018
• Site plan, variance applications due by 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday, May 23, 2018
Next City Council Meetings:
Thursday, May 10, 2018 - 7:00 p.m.
Thursday, May 24, 2018 - 7:00 p.m
2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Schedule:
May 7 - Open House at the Municipal Center - 6:00 p.m.
May 16 - Public Hearing at Planning Commission - 7:00 p.m.
BACKGROUND:
N/A
BUDGET IMPACT:
N/A