Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/20/2018*000 Apple Valley Meeting Location: Municipal Center 7100 147th Street West Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124 June 20, 2018 PLANNING COMMISSION TENTATIVE AGENDA 7:00 PM 1. Call to Order 2. Approve Agenda 3. Approve Consent Agenda Items Consent Agenda Items are considered routine and will be enacted with a single motion, without discussion, unless a commissioner or citizen requests to have any item separately considered. It will then be moved to the land use/action items for consideration. A. Approve Minutes of June 6, 2018, Regular Meeting 4. Public Hearings 5. Land Use / Action Items A. Grier Garage Variance - PC 18-15-V Consider Request to Reduce Front Yard Setback from 30' to 17' (13' Variance) for 400 sq. ft. garage addition. Location: 216 Edgewood Lane (Lot 8, Block 1 APPLE VALLEY 3RD ADDN) Petitioner: Elliot Grier and MacGregor Grier B. Ryan Real Estate Redevelopment - PC 1 8-13-ZCB 1. Consider Amendments to Planned Development No. 290, Conditional Use Permit (CUP), and Site Plan Review/Building Permit Authorization for 11,000 sq. ft. Multiple Tenant Building Location: 14750 Cedar Ave (Southeast Corner Cedar Ave & 147th St) Petitioner: Launch Properties and CJ Ryan, LLC 6. Other Business A. The Shores Townhomes - Sketch Plan Review of a Proposed 96 -Unit Townhome Project - PC 18-16-ZB Location: Northeast Corner of 157th Street West and Johnny Cake Ridge Road Petitioner: Pulte Homes of Minnesota, LLC and Rockport, LLC B. Review of Upcoming Schedule and Other Updates Next Planning Commission Meeting - Wednesday, July 18, 2018 - 7:00 p .111, Next City Council Meeting - Thursday, June 28, 2018 - 7:00 p.m. 7. Adjourn Regular meetings are broadcast, live, on Charter Communications Cable Channel 180 and on the City's website at wwwcityofapplevalley.org Oa 1••• 000 ITEM: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: SECTION: 3.A. June 20, 2018 Consent Agenda Description: Approve Minutes of June 6, 2018, Regular Meeting Staff Contact: Joan Murphy, Department Assistant ACTION REQUESTED: Approve minutes of regular meeting of June 6, 2018. Department / Division: Community Development Department SUMMARY: The minutes of the last regular Planning Commission meeting are attached for your review and approval. BACKGROUND: State statute requires the creation and preservation of meeting minutes which document the official actions and proceedings of public governing bodies. BUDGET IMPACT: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Minutes CITY OF APPLE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 6, 2018 1. CALL TO ORDER The City of Apple Valley Planning Commission meeting was called to order by Vice -Chair Burke at 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Ken Alwin, Tim Burke, Jodi Kurtz, Paul Scanlan and David Schindler. Members Absent: Keith Diekmann and Tom Melander. Staff Present: City Attorney Sharon Hills, City Engineer Brandon Anderson, City Planner Tom Lovelace, Planner Kathy Bodmer, Planner/Economic Development Specialist Alex Sharpe, Civil Engineer Ahmed Omer and Department Assistant Joan Murphy. 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Vice -Chair Burke asked if there were any changes to the agenda. MOTION: Commissioner Alwin moved, seconded by Commissioner Kurtz, moving item 5A — Appliance Smart Building Conditional Use Permit and Building Addition Site Plan/Building Permit Authorization — PCi 8 -06 -CB to the consent agenda. Ayes - 5 - Nays - 0. MOTION: Commissioner Alwin moved, seconded by Commissioner Kurtz, approving the agenda as amended. Ayes - 5 - Nays - 0. 3. CONSENT ITEMS MOTION: Commissioner Alwin moved, seconded by Commissioner Kurtz, approving the minutes of the meeting of May 2, 2018. Ayes - 5 - Nays - 0. Nelson Four Season Porch and Shed Setback Variances — PCi 8-1 1-V. MOTION: Commissioner Alwin moved, seconded by Commissioner Kurtz, recommending approval of a variance reducing the principal structure rear yard setback from 30' to 22' (8' variance) fora 224 sq. ft. four season porch addition, subject to all City Codes, and the following conditions: 1. The variance shall be applicable to Lot 6, Block 1, Pilot Knob Estates Third Addition. 2. If applicable, a Natural Resource Management Permit (NRMP) shall be obtained prior to any site disturbance including site grading. 3. Prior to issuance of the building permit, the existing shed which does not meet setback requirements shall be brought into compliance either through a granted variance or other means. Ayes - 5 - Nays - 0. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes June 6, 2018 Page 2 of 7 MOTION: Commissioner Alwin moved, seconded by Commissioner Kurtz, recommending approval of a variance on Lot 6, Block 1, Pilot Knob Estates Third Addition reducing the side yard setback for an existing accessory structure from 5' to 2' 6" (2' 6" variance) for a shed on the property, subject to the following conditions: 1. An encroachment agreement shall be obtained with the City stating that the shed will be removed if access to the easement is necessary or the shed shall be removed within one year of the approval of the variance. Ayes -5 -Nays-O. MOTION: Commissioner Alwin moved, seconded by Commissioner Kurtz, recommending approval of a variance on Lot 6, Block 1, Pilot Knob Estates Third Addition reducing the rear yard setback for an existing accessory structure from 10' to 4' 6" (5' 6" variance) for a shed on the property, subject to the following conditions: 1. An encroachment agreement shall be obtained with the City stating that the shed will be removed if access to the easement is necessary or the shed shall be removed within one year of the approval of the variance. Ayes -5 -Nays-0. Item 5A moved to consent agenda: Appliance Smart Building Conditional Use Permit and Building Addition Site Plan/Building Permit Authorization — PCi 8 -06 -CB MOTION: Commissioner Alwin moved, seconded by Commissioner Kurtz, recommending approval of a conditional use permit to allow fora 2,973 -sq. ft. Class II restaurant with drive-through window service; subject to the following conditions: • The Conditional Use Permit shall apply to property to be platted as Lot 2, Block 1, Apple Valley Retail 2nd Addition. • Such operations shall be conducted in conformance with the site plan date stamped May 16, 2018, subject to the removal of the 23 parking spaces along the south side of the building. • All the existing parking spaces in the north lot shall be re -striped prior to occupancy of the building addition. • Landscaping in conformance with City Code requirements shall ne installed in all parking lot islands prior to occupancy of the building addition. Ayes - 5 - Nays - O. MOTION: Commissioner Alwin moved, seconded by Commissioner Kurtz, recommending approval of site plan/building permit authorization to allow for construction of a 7,087 -sq. ft. addition to an existing 48,960 -sq. ft. retail building located at 7370 153rd Street West subject to the following conditions: • All mechanical equipment shall be screened in accordance with the City's zoning code. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes June 6, 2018 Page 3 of 7 • The trash enclosure shall have walls that are architecturally compatible with the exterior finish of the proposed addition. • An existing storm sewer line that will be located under the building addition will need to be relocated to the satisfaction of the City. • Approval and issuance of any permits shall be subject to meeting all the requirements set forth in the City Engineer's memo, dated June 1, 2018. Ayes - 5 - Nays - 0. 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Regency Centers Sign Conditional Use Permit Amendment — PC18-09-CV Vice -Chair Burke opened the public hearing at 7:02 p.m. Planner/Economic Development Specialist Alex Sharpe stated the existing signs do not meet several code standards, such as setbacks, height, and size and as they were existing signs, and received approval via a CUP in 1992 when variances were not required. The signs may predate code standards as the center was formerly an indoor mall in the early 1970's and are larger than code permits, but were permitted in 1992. The overall sign area is being reduced from approximately 329 sq. ft. to 267 sq. ft. This is being achieved by reducing the height from 32' 6" to 30' 7". The property manager Regency Centers is updating the exterior of the center in the summer of 2018, and is making substantial site improvements. Elevations of the proposed renovations are included as part of the proposal. The applicant letter notes that they wish to update these signs so that they can be consistent with the other site improvements. Vice -Chair Burke closed the public hearing at 7:08 p.m. MOTION: Commissioner Alwin moved, seconded by Commissioner Kurtz, recommending approval of a Conditional Use Permit amendment for two major anchor signs at Apple Valley Square subject to the following conditions: 1. The signs proposed shall be consistent with the elevations, other than the face, and site plan date April 20, 2018, which detail the height, size, and general materials of the structure. 2. Per Resolution 1992-278, landscaping shall be provided around the signs, and maintained in proper health. 3. Per Resolution 1992-278, the signs shall remain in their existing locations. Ayes - 5 - Nays - O. B. Ryan Real Estate Redevelopment — PC18-13-ZCB Vice -Chair Burke opened the public hearing at 7:09 p.m. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes June 6, 2018 Page 4 of 7 Planner Kathy Bodmer summarized the request by Launch Properties and CJ Ryan, LLC for consideration of an application for the redevelopment of the Ryan Real Estate property at 14750 Cedar Ave (Lot 1, Block 2 Apple Valley Commercial Addition) on the southeast corner of Cedar Ave and 147th Street W. The proposed development would include the demolition of the existing multiple -tenant office building and construction of an 11,000 sq. ft. multiple tenant building with two small restaurants, a coffee shop with a single drive-thru lane and a dental office. The building is proposed to be situated in a north -south alignment parallel with Cedar Ave. The drive-thru lane is proposed to circulate around the north and west sides of the building in a counter clockwise direction with the pickup window on the south side of the building. The drive- thru lane provides adequate stacking space for queuing vehicles; a bypass lane is provided on the south side of the drive-thru. Functioning doors are located on the west side of the building which indicates rear deliveries are expected. Deliveries may conflict with the drive-thru lane if delivery vehicles must share the drive-thru lane to access the west side of the building. The entrance to the businesses will be on the east side of the building with the rear of the building facing Cedar Ave. The petitioners have indicated that they intend to construct the building with 4 - sided architecture in mind. Ms. Bodmer reviewed the exterior building materials, driveway access and parking requirements. Amendments to PD -290, Zone 1, are also requested for reduced parking lot setbacks. The northeast quadrant of the County Road 42 and Cedar Avenue intersection is zoned Planned Development No. 290 (PD -290) which provides for an integrated mix of limited business and certain retail uses that support limited business uses. Within the PD, the property is zoned Zone 1 which allows limited business uses including professional offices, banks, clinics for human care, hospitals and nursing homes. A Class I restaurant and a dental clinic would be permitted uses in the zoning district. The PD would need to be amended to add Class III Neighborhood restaurants and drive-thru window service in connection with a Class III restaurant as a conditional use. Class III restaurants are less than 2,500 sq. ft. serving coffee, sandwiches, soups, baked goods and similar items that don't require the installation of a Type I ventilation hood (grease and smoke removing). The previous development proposal for the Ryan Real Estate site revealed the need for a regional solution for the traffic issues at the 147th Street/Glazier and Cedar Ave/147th Street intersections. Street improvements include a future restricted right -in, right -out only access on 147th Street/ Glazier Ave intersection and construction of a roundabout east at the north alignment of Glazier Ave which will allow for protected u -turns from the site back to Cedar Ave. Vice -Chair Burke referenced the staff report that some this is depending on improvements on 147th Street and asked which comes first, the development or the street improvements. City Engineer Brandon Anderson answered that on the City Council agenda for June 14, will be an item to authorize City staff to start a feasibility study and start the design process on the public improvements. They would be treating the public improvements separate. Vice -Chair Burke inquired if the parking could limit the number of seats in the restaurant. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes June 6, 2018 Page 5 of 7 Ms. Bodmer answered yes and on a case by case basis they would need to evaluate the number of seats and that outdoor seating could help. Commissioner Scanlan expressed concern for the exit lane and made comparison to another recent development and that could make it work. He asked if there was concern for the trash enclosure being so close to the entry and exit when it would need to be serviced and would be blocking traffic flow. He questioned which would come first, the improvements on 147th Street or the new construction and how the left hand turns were going to be handled. Ms. Bodmer answered it is her understanding that they would continue to go through the normal planning review process. Based on the timing, the developer and owner would be ready to go sooner than the public improvement project but could be running concurrent a little bit. Mr. Anderson said there is an increase in traffic and there would be lengthening of turn lanes to address the stacking problems. Peter Coyle, Larkin Hoffman, represented the owners of the property Mr. and Mrs. Ryan. He said this project is a lesser generator of traffic than the project a few months ago but it does generate more traffic. Commissioner Scanlan said he had questions on the vehicle flow in the drive-thru. Brian Wurdeman, Kimley Horn, said they would try to add buffer for drainage, still have adequate parking and plan to add signage for the drive-thru. Vice -Chair Burke asked about the EFIS material and commented that there is too much of it. Ben Patacheck, from the team, showed the materials board and said they can increase the amount of brick and decrease the EFIS. Vice -Chair Burke asked for them to continue to work with staff. Vice -Chair Burke closed the public hearing at 7:33 p.m. C. 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Vice -Chair Burke opened the public hearing at 7:34 p.m. City Planner Tom Lovelace stated all cities and counties within the seven -county Twin Cities Metropolitan Region are required to update their comprehensive plan every ten years. As required by the Minnesota Metropolitan Land Planning Act, each local jurisdiction's plan must fit within the regional goals set forth by the Metropolitan Council. The Council has established their regional goals in Thrive 2040, which is the vision for the region over the next 30 years. Thrive MSP 2040 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes June 6, 2018 Page 6 of 7 sets the policy foundations for systems and policy plans developed by the Council, which include transportation, water resources, regional parks, and housing policy plans. Upon completion of these policy plans, the Council prepares and distributes a system statement to each community and county in the region. This document addresses the implications of the metropolitan systems plans for each community in the region and is intended to help in the preparation or update of their comprehensive plan. Each plan is required to contain a land use, transportation, water resources (water supply, water quality, and wastewater), parks and trails, and housing chapter and may contain an economic chapter. Drafts of the required chapters have been completed and are ready for review. As was the case with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan Update, a draft economic chapter has been completed, which was reviewed by the City's Economic Development Authority at their May 24, 2018 meeting. The primary focus of the 2040 Plan Update has been on updating facts and figures as the majority of the goals and policies set forth in the 2030 Plan remain relevant. The SRF Consulting Group was retained to be the lead consultant and has been responsible for the preparation of the required Land Use, Housing, and Transportation chapters; as well as Vision, and Community Context chapters. Separate consultants were retained to prepare the Water Resources and Parks and Active Living chapters. The Planning Commission, acting as the steering committee for the project, met with the consultants on several occasions in 2017-18 to review and provide input on the Plan's chapters. During the past year the Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee discussed the Parks and Active Living chapter of the Plan at their meetings, and formal presentations of the chapter were given to the Committee by staff and Confluence, the consultant retained by the City to draft the chapter. The consultant also attended the 2017 Home and Garden Expo, conducted an online survey, and met with several stakeholders such as DARTS, School District 196, Dakota County Community Development Agency, Apple Valley Chamber of Commerce, the Dakota County Transportation Division, and the Sustainability Alliance. City staff attended this year's Home and Garden Expo and had Comp Plan information available for review by the attendees. And finally, two open houses were held on April 30 and May 7 at the City Council chambers where the public had an opportunity to review and discuss with staff the proposed update. On May 24, 2018, Staff presented a draft Economic Development chapter to the City's Economic Development Authority and the City Council authorized the distribution of the draft plan to adjacent cities, Dakota County, school districts and state agencies for their review. These affected jurisdictions have up to six months to review and comment on the City's Plan. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes June 6, 2018 Page 7 of 7 Staff will make the appropriate changes from the comments received from those jurisdictions and public and submit the final Plan to the Metropolitan Council by December 31, 2018. Rita Ulrich, 12444 Pilot Knob Rd, said she has an environmental and planning background. She would like provisions for wildlife and creative habitat with more native plant gardens introduced into the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Sharon Mason, 13646 Hannibal Circle, said she is an advocate for housing at the state level and now at the local level. She wants Apple Valley to be a welcoming community. She feels there are lots of needs out there in the community where some residents maybe very close to poverty. She believes there should be plans for those at the lowest income levels. She expressed concern for developers that can purchase property, upgrade and improve and then the residents receive a 30, 60 or 90 day notice. She would like to see a plan to retain those units and incorporate protection for those low income people or help in the transition. She added Apple Valley should be a welcoming community and a desirable community. Vice -Chair Burke closed the public hearing at 8:30 p.m. 5. LAND USE/ACTION ITEMS -NONE - 6. OTHER BUSINESS A. Review of upcoming schedule and other updates. City Planner Tom Lovelace stated that the next regular Planning Commission meeting would take place Wednesday, June 20, 2018, at 7:00 p.m. 7. ADJOURNMENT Hearing no further comments from the Planning Staff or Planning Commission, Vice -Chair Burke asked for a motion to adjourn. MOTION: Commissioner Schindler moved, seconded by Commissioner Scanlan to adjourn the meeting at 8:31 p.m. Ayes - 5 - Nays - 0. Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Joan Murphy Joan Murphy, Planning Department Assistant Approved by the Apple Valley Planning Commission on Tim Burke, Vice -Chair Oa 1••• 000 ITEM: 5.A. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: June 20, 2018 SECTION: Land Use /Action Items Description: Grier Garage Variance (PCI 8-1 5-V) Staff Contact: Kathy Bodmer, AICP, Planner Department / Division: Community Development Department Applicant: Elliot Grier and MacGregor Grier Applicant Date: 6/5/2018 60 Days: 8/3/2018 Project Number: PCI 8-1 5-V 120 Days: 10/2/2018 ACTION REQUESTED: Recommend approval of a variance at 216 Edgewood Lane to reduce the front yard setback from 30' to 17' (13' variance) to construct a 400 sq. ft. garage addition subject to compliance with all City Codes and in accordance with the approved plans and the following conditions, based on the findings listed below: Conditions: 1. Owner shall submit overall reconstruction plans at the time of construction of the garage to confirm size of house vs. size of garage. 2. At the time of application of the building permit, owner shall submit a calculation of impervious surface coverage that demonstrates that impervious coverage is less than 35% of the lot area. 3. The variance allows the property owner to have a 3 -stall garage on the property. No other storage buildings may be constructed on the property. Findings: 1. The home was constructed in 1965 with a single stall garage. A single garage stall restricts the use of the property. The variance is requested to make reasonable use of the property. 2. The existing garage is located 9' from the side property line. There is insufficient space available to construct a second garage stall beside the existing stall. 3. The rear yard is heavily wooded and has a 10' elevation change to the rear lot line. Constructing the garage on the rear of the home would require tree removal and substantial grading. 4. The front of the home is located 6' back from the minimum front setback line, providing additional room for an addition to the front of the home. 5. Constructing the garage addition on the front of the home will create less site disturbance and result in less impervious surface area than an addition on the rear of the home. 6. The Comprehensive Plan states: "The City encourages the maintenance of property and the reinvestment in existing homes. Improvements to existing homes must be compatible in use, size, and scale with adjacent properties." The proposed addition is a reinvestment in the property to make the property suitable for today's homeowners. 7. The City's experience is that one property owner making a significant investment in his or her property will encourage neighboring properties to make updates and improvements to their homes. Edgewood Lane in scheduled to be reconstructed in the near future which will also encourage property owners to update and improve their properties. SUMMARY: A variance is requested at 216 Edgewood Lane to reduce the front yard setback from 30' to 17' (13' variance) to replace an existing single stall garage with 772 sq. ft. garage. The home was constructed in 1965 with a single stall garage. The garage and home were recently damaged by fire and need significant repair. The owner would like to reconstruct the garage by constructing a two stall garage in front of the existing garage and then creating a tandem garage stall connecting to the existing single garage stall. The property is located at the end of a loop street immediately south of Alimagnet Park. The home is located 36' from the front property line; the minimum front yard setback is 30'. The fact that the home is set back an additional 6' provides additional room in front of the home for an addition. The rear yard is heavily wooded with the elevation increasing 10' from the back of the house to the rear property line. The owner states that constructing the garage behind the house isn't feasible. The fact that the home is set back an additional 6' provides additional room in front of the home for an addition. Reconstructing and redeveloping existing properties often requires some degree of flexibility. Allowing a front yard variance will reduce the length of the driveway, but with 33' of driveway remaining, sufficient room will remain for parking on the driveway. Constructing the garage in front of the house rather than behind the house will minimize impervious surface area on the lot. The garage addition will replace existing impervious driveway. An addition to the rear of the home would require tree removal and grading and increase the amount of impervious surface area on the lot. The applicant evaluated reducing the front variance from 13' to 10'. Reducing the variance by 3' requires that the garage take a notch out of the existing living space. A 13' variance allows the garage to be constructed without removing a portion of the living space for the garage. It is staffs view that a single stall garage restricts the use of the property. A family in the 1960s might have functioned with little difficulty with a single stall garage. Today, most families have at least two cars and need room for additional storage. The variance request will reasonably adapt the property for today's use without negatively impacting neighboring properties. BACKGROUND: The Staff reviews variance applications based strictly upon the requirements of the state statutes and the City Code which require that the applicant establish that there are practical difficulties present in order for a variance to be granted, and that logical alternatives are not available. Staff finds that the applicant has met the definition of a practical difficulty which justifies the granting of the variance. The proposed variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. BUDGET IMPACT: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Background Material Applicant Letter Location Map Zoning Map Survey Survey Elevations Photo Correspondence City of APPIIe y TO: Planning Commission Members FROM: Kathy Bodmer, Planner DATE: June 20, 2018 SUBJECT: Updated motions for Grier Garage Variance (PCi 8-1 5-V) MEMO Community Development ACTION REQUESTED: Recommend approval of a variance at 216 Edgewood Lane to reduce the front yard setback from 30' to 20' (10' variance) to construct a 340 sq. ft. garage addition subject to compliance with all City Codes and in accordance with the approved plans and the following conditions, based on the findings listed below: Conditions: 1. Owner shall submit overall reconstruction plans at the time of construction of the garage to confirm the size of the house vs. size of the garage. 2. At the time of application of the building permit, owner shall submit a calculation of impervious surface coverage that demonstrates that impervious coverage is less than 35% of the lot area. 3. The variance allows the property owner to have a 3 -stall garage on the property. No other storage buildings may be constructed on the property. 4. Prior to any site work or tree removal, owner shall obtain a Natural Resources Management Permit (NRMP) and shall comply with the NRMP ordinance requirements. 5. The driveway grade may not exceed 10% slope. Owner shall modify plans as required to meet the maximum 10% slope requirement. Findings: (No recommended changes) Grier Garage Variance PROJECT REVIEW Existing Conditions Property Location: 216 Edgewood Lane Legal Description: Lot 8, Block 1 APPLE VALLEY 3RD ADDITION Comprehensive Plan Designation "LD" (Low Density Residential, 2-6 units/acre) Zoning Classification "R-3" (Single family residential, minimum lot size 11,000 sq. ft.) Existing Platting Platted Lot Current Land Use Single family residential Size: 11,322 (0.26 acres) Topography: Flat Existing Vegetation Vegetation consistent with established residential neighborhood. Other Significant Natural Features NA Adjacent Properties/Land Uses NORTH Alimagnet Park Comprehensive Plan PARK - Park Zoning/Land Use P -Institutional SOUTH Lot 7, Block 1 Apple Valley Third Addition Comprehensive Plan LD -Low density residential, 2-6 units/acre Zoning/Land Use R-3 Single family, 11,000 sq. ft. min. lot EAST Lot 2, Block 1 Apple Valley Third Addition Comprehensive Plan LD -Low density residential, 2-6 units/acre Zoning/Land Use R-3 Single family, 11,000 sq. ft. min. lot WEST Lot 15, Block 3 Apple Valley Third Addition Comprehensive Plan LD -Low density residential, 2-6 units/acre Zoning/Land Use R-3 Single family, 11,000 sq. ft. min. lot Variance Review Considerations: Definition of "Practical difficulties": • The applicant proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning provisions of the code; • The plight of the applicant is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the applicant; and • The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. • Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. In order to grant a variance, the City considers the following factors to determine whether the applicant established that there are practical difficulties in complying with the provision(s) of this Chapter: 1. Special conditions apply to the structure or land in question that are particular to the property and do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district or vicinity in which the land is located; The granting of the proposed variance will not be contrary to the intent of this chapter; The special conditions or circumstances do not result from the actions of the owner/applicant; 4. The granting of the variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate practical difficulties in complying with the zoning provisions of this Code; and 5. The variance requested is the minimum variance necessary to alleviate the practical difficulty. To whom it may concern, The home at 216 Edgewood Ln was involved in a fire March 17th which destroyed the garage and resulted in extensive damage to the rest of the house. We would like to take this opportunity while rebuilding to expand the garage to fit two cars side by side. Because of where the house is situated on the property we feel the best option is to build the garage in front of where the existing one car garage was. Weare therefore requesting a 13 foot variance to the front setback to allow the garage to be built up to 17' away from the west property line. If a 13' variance is not approved we ask that a 10' variance would be considered. Although a 10' variance would allow a 2 -car garage to be built, it would require borrowing some space from existing house which is not optimal. The lot sits at the end of a street that gets very little traffic. We have discussed this proposal with the neighbors and they did not bring up any objections. This is also the only house in the neighborhood with a one car garage. Regards, MacGregor Grier, Janelle Grier, Stephen Grier, Diane Grier, Elliott Grier and Emily Grier r Alimagnet Lake J L 1 Alimagnet Park J NE \tEW0000 _ 1 ' SPRUCE � ofez i R -CL 143RD ST W 143RD STREET CT R -CL 144TH ST WR -CL 0 SREETC/' r•S‘‘ 7,3 \ P R-3 WALNUT LN SITE 0 w PINEWOOD DR z w 0 R-3 R-3 A/N0/OOO z J 1 R-3 LINDt�v 0 z w 0 z J c9 R-3 woo.ouprAmmn 171709.068,96 ,N0Hd Mg NW Iiiinsiuno `oz, uns `,17 .H.0 LSM 009 S:10/]ANS / SEMNION1/ aliNNVid IOU! 111!H 'El sewer •oul sApHunoy >iJanin!H AOAJI1S lo oleopJao VIO.NNIIA1 ,11VA11,1V GUS Gal poomabp] 9 N woo.ouNtmAnm 171709.0687. :11\10Hd LEE. NIAI ITIIASNE1119 '0.1111S ',V ISTIA 00C, SEIOAM:111S/SElliNlekli SHiNNVid •oul siappg )m(] AOAJIIS 10 eleoDso ,311VA ,1c1c1 OUS OUE1 poomabpj 91, ]Nbl cloom]eco Front Elevation 3-D Rendering Depicting 10' Rather than 13' Variance View Street P1 217 Edgewoodin Apple Valley. M Ofd } View :\7\\ \\§ \\:°\&y Signature Signature Apple Valley Planning Commission RE: 216 Edgewood boulevard variance request Dear Planning Commission, 11 I am the neighbor immediately south of 216 Edgewood Lane where a 13' boulevard variance to build a two -car garage is requested. Construction of this garage will impair my line -of -sight (view) toward the park to the north. Nevertheless, 1 support approval of this variance. Regards, Apple Valley Planning Commission RE: 216 Edgewood boulevard variance request Dear Planning Commission, e) J. Lav MAJ 4?Pk L1661421 'w(40/0111V lam the neighbor immediately across from 216 Edgewood Lane where a 13' boulevard variance to build a two -car garage is requested. Construction of this garage will impact my view across the street. Nevertheless, I support approval of this variance. Regards, Oa 1••• 000 ITEM: 5.B. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: June 20, 2018 SECTION: Land Use /Action Items Description: Ryan Real Estate Redevelopment - PCI 8-1 3-ZCB Staff Contact: Kathy Bodmer, AICP, Planner Department / Division: Community Development Department Applicant: Launch Properties and CJ Ryan, LLC Applicant Date: 5/15/2018 60 Days: 7/13/2018 Project Number: PCI 8-1 3-ZCB 120 Days: 9/11/2018 ACTION REQUESTED: 1. Recommend approval of the draft ordinance rezoning the subject property from Zone 1 to Zone 5 and establishing area and setback standards for Zone 5 subject to execution of a Planned Development Agreement. 2. Recommend approval of a conditional use permit for operation of a single lane drive- thru service in connection with a Class III Restaurant with the following conditions: 1. Approval of a conditional use permit (CUP) is subject to approval of zoning amendments to allow drive-thru window service on this site. 2. The drive-thru lane shall be designed with bump outs or other treatments to minimize conflicts between the drive-thru lane and delivery vehicles. 3. The final design of the drive-thru lane shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 3. Recommend approval of the Site Plan and give Building Permit Authorization for construction of an 11,000 sq. ft. multiple tenant building in accordance with the approved plans and subject to conformance with all City Codes and the following conditions: 1. Approval of the site plan/building permit authorization is subject to approval of amendments to PD -290 and execution of a Planned Development Agreement. 2. Approval of the site plan/building permit authorization is subject to approval of the CUP for window drive-thru service. 3. A nursery bid list shall be submitted at time of application of the building permit that confirms the value of the landscape plantings meet or exceed 2-1/2% of the value of the construction of the building based on Means Construction Data. 4. A demolition plan shall be submitted which specifies which trees are to be removed and which are to be preserved. 5. The grading and drainage plans shall be revised to show tree protective fencing in areas where existing trees are to be protect. 6. No sign approvals are given at this time. A separate sign permit must be obtained prior to the installation of any signs on the site. 7. Civil plans are subject to final review and approval by the City Engineer at the time of application of the building permit and natural resources management permit (NRNP). 8. Alighting plan showing light levels on the site shall be submitted at the time of application of the building permit subject to review and approval by the Planner. SUMMARY: Launch Properties and CJ Ryan, LLC request consideration of an application for the redevelopment of the Ryan Real Estate property at 14750 Cedar Ave (Lot 1, Block 2 Apple Dalley Commercial Addition) on the southeast corner of Cedar Ave and 147th Street W. The proposed development would include the demolition of the existing multiple -tenant office building and construction of an 11,000 sq. ft. multiple tenant building with two small restaurants, a coffee shop with a single drive-thru lane and a dental office. BACKGROUND: The proposed 11,000 sq. ft. multiple tenant retail building is proposed to have the following tenants: • 3,600 sq. ft. Class I Casual Restaurant • 2,200 sq. ft. Class III Restaurant, • 2,100sq. ft. Class III coffee shop with drive-thru window service • 3,000 sq. ft. dental office The new building is proposed to be oriented in a north -south alignment parallel with Cedar Ave. The number of seats in the restaurants will be somewhat limited by the number of parking spaces available on the site. At this time, 93 parking spaces are required based on the number of seats indicated; 94 parking spaces are provided. The drive-thru lane will circulate in a counterclockwise direction around the north and west sides of the building. The drive-thru window will be located on the south side of the building. A longer bypass lane has been added. The public hearing for the zoning amendments and conditional use permit (CUP) was held at the June 6, 2018, Planning Commission meeting. The Site Plan has been modified to address concerns raised by the Planning Commission and staff. 1. The bypass lane was expanded to 18' wide which will allow for a narrow, but functional, bypass. 2. The parking lot setbacks from 147th Street and Glazier Ave were increased to provide a minimum of 10' to meet the PD zoning requirements. The City Engineer is concerned that the location of the dumpsters may cause conflicts between customers trying to enter the site and trash removal activities. Staff will continue to work with the petitioner on this issue. Zoning: The northeast quadrant of the County Road 42 and Cedar Avenue intersection is zoned Planned Development No. 290 (PD -290) which provides for an integrated mix of limited business and certain retail uses that support limited business uses. The draft ordinance proposes to rezone the property from Zone 1 to Zone 5 which would contain many of the same limited business uses as Zone 1. Zone 5 is based on Zone 4 which currently allows Class III Restaurants and drive-thru in connection with a Class III Restaurant by conditional use permit. Zone 5 will be set up to not allow the retail uses currently allowed in Zone 4 to ensure the limited business uses are retained but to allow for the addition of the Class III restaurants and drive-thru. This zoning will not impact neighboring properties currently zoned Zone 1. Street and Intersection Impacts: A preliminary traffic study was done which analyzed potential traffic impacts resulting from the redevelopment of the site. During peak periods, backups occur when vehicles are waiting at the intersection of Cedar Avenue and 147th Street which prevents vehicles from being able to turn west from northbound Glazier Ave. Backups occur when the 147th Street queue extends past Glazier Ave to the south, making it very difficult to turn west on 147th Street. The traffic study finds that the new development will generate additional traffic in the area. Regional road improvements will be needed for the intersections of Cedar Ave and 147th Street and 147th Street and Glazier Ave north extension and south extension. The City Council will review the Preliminary Engineering Study to begin to address regional road improvements in this area at its June 14, 2018, meeting. The study is expected to be authorized at that meeting. BUDGET IMPACT: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Background Material Map Plan Set Plan Set Ordinance Correspondence Memo Memo Plan Set Plan Set Ryan Real Estate Redevelopment PROJECT REVIEW Existing Conditions Property Location: 14750 Cedar Ave Legal Description: Lot 1 Block 2, APPLE VALLEY COMMERCIAL ADD, SUBJ TO PAR 5 DAKOTA CO R/W MAP 180 & SUBJ TO PARCEL 114 DAKOTA CO R/W MAP 324 Comprehensive Plan Designation C -Commercial Zoning Classification PD -290, Zone 1 Existing Platting Platted lot of record subject to Dakota County Right-of-way Acquisitions Current Land Use Multiple -tenant office building Size: 2.0 acres Topography: Flat Existing Vegetation Urban landscape. Other Significant Natural Features N/A NORTH Across 147th Street — Applebee's Restaurant Comprehensive Plan C -Commercial Zoning/Land Use PD -290, Zone 4 (Neighborhood -oriented retail) SOUTH Metro Dental/Merchant's Bank Comprehensive Plan C -Commercial Zoning/Land Use PD -290, Zone 1 EAST Across Glazier Ave — Wings Federal Credit Union Comprehensive Plan C -Commercial Zoning/Land Use PD -290, Zone 3 WEST Across Cedar Ave — Bank of America Comprehensive Plan C -Commercial Zoning/Land Use RB -Retail Business Development Project Review Comprehensive Plan: The Comprehensive Plan guides the development of the site for "C" (Commercial) uses. The vision for northeast quadrant of Cedar Avenue and County Road 42 has historically been professional office uses with very limited retail uses to support the office uses. A multiple tenant building with restaurants and a dental clinic is consistent with the C designation. Zoning: The property is zoned PD -290, Zone 1, which allows limited business uses including professional offices, banks, civic centers, clinics for human care, nursing homes and limited retail. A Class I (full service) restaurant is a permitted use in Zone 1. The property owners wish to amend the PD zoning to add Class III Neighborhood restaurants as a permitted use and add a drive-thru in connection with a Class III restaurant as a conditional use. They also request the following reduced parking setbacks: Setback Type Street (Street Type) Min. Setback Req'd Proposed Setback Notes Parking Setback Cedar Ave 20' 8' For drive-thru lane. Due to corner monument easements. Parking Setback 147th St 20' 7' Drive-thru lane Parking Setback Glazier Ave 20' 6' Preliminary Plat: The property is currently platted. No platting of the property is proposed in connection with this project. Site Plan: The existing access on the northwest corner of the site abutting 147th Street will be closed. On Glazier Ave, two access points are proposed: a right -in only access and a full access to the south. The 11,000 sq. ft. building is proposed to be situated in a north -south alignment parallel with Cedar Avenue. The drive-thru lane is proposed to wrap around the north and west sides of the building in a counter clockwise direction with the service window on the south side of the building. A bypass is shown on the southern end of the drive thru lane. A total of 94 parking spaces are provided on the site; with 183 restaurant seats and 3,000 sq. ft. dentist, a total of 93 parking spaces is required, meeting the parking requirement. The garbage enclosure is shown on the southeast corner of the site, out of view from Cedar Ave and 147th Street W. Grading Plan: The grading plan was reviewed by the City Engineer and his memo is attached to the staff report. The site is proposed to be scraped, but no significant changes to the site elevations are proposed. The final grading plan is subject to review and approval of the City Engineer at the time of issuance of the building permit. The developer plans to save the elm trees planted along Cedar Avenue. Tree protective fencing should be added to the grading plan. Elevation Drawings: The exterior building materials are proposed to be burnished block, face brick, EIFs, and engineered wood siding. It appears that the predominant exterior building material is EIFs. Commercial buildings are required to be constructed of "100% non- combustible, non -degradable and maintenance -free construction materials (such as face brick or natural stone...)." EIFs maybe used for decorative features, but should not be a primary exterior building material. The west elevation of the building will be the "rear" of the building and will face Cedar Ave. The building is designed so that the four sides of a building have equally attractive elevations. An approximately four foot "gabion wall" is shown to block the view of the meters and electrical equipment on the building. A gabion wall is a cage -type structure filled with rock material to give a natural rock wall appearance. This type of wall is an alternative to a mortared brick or stone wall. Landscape Plan: The value of the landscape planting must meet or exceed 2-1/2% of the value of the construction of the building based on Means Construction Data. A nursery bid list will be required at the time of application of the building permit that confirms that the value of the landscape plantings meet or exceed the 2-1/2% requirement. Hardscape, such as edging and rock, and sod do not count towards the landscape budget. Availability of Municipal Utilities: Utilities are available at the site. No extension of utilities is needed to serve this development; only connections to existing service lines will be needed. Domestic and fire water service lines will be required to be split outside the building. Street Classifications/Accesses/Circulation: • Cedar Avenue (Principal Arterial Street) — 90' half right-of-way with additional right-of- way easements obtained for community entry monuments at Cedar and 147th Street. No access permitted or proposed. • 147th Street West (Minor Community Collector) — 40' half right-of-way. The existing drive access onto 147th Street will be closed in connection with this development. • Glazier Avenue (Local) — 30' half right-of-way. Traffic Study: A traffic study was conducted that analyzed the new development with the new proposed uses. Traffic demand is lower than the previous plans reviewed last year. However, traffic levels are expected to impact adjacent intersections. Brandon Anderson will review the traffic study in more detail. Pedestrian Access: A pedestrian connection is provided through the site from the front of the building (east side) and continues east out to Glazier Ave. An extension of a landscape island is provided for a pedestrian refuge in the center of the site. Sidewalk connections are also shown from the north and south sides of the building to Cedar Ave. Public Safety Issues: None identified. Recreation Issues: None identified. Signs: No sign approvals are given at this time. No signs may be installed prior to the issuance of a permit. A separate sign permit must be obtained prior to the installation of any signs on the site or the building. The preliminary sign plans show the use of a pre -order board. No pre -order boards are permitted. With two drive-thru lanes, two menu boards are allowed. Public Hearing Comments: To be taken. ' ILII II I II I II I II I II I�" • MIN C I C INS INS w U 0 z z w c� m C DC 146TH ATM° 61,I47THSTW ■ w111Q <Fr 148TH ST W 149TH ST W C LD JONATHAN DR z J 0 0 Z z w C FRONTAGE RD C * aMINNA g TY �7aea:7mg C 150TH ST W RYAN REAL ESTATE REDEVELOPMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP C SITE C C C INS GLAZIER AVE C C 150TH ST W x d z � C 0IC7 151ST ST W MUM 0 I I &VI g 152ND ST W LB Lan HM-6C��m 0 of RB w I45THSTW RB GB CEDAR AVE M -8C � 11 • 4A COUNTY ROAD 42 RB TH ST W RB IFNI FRONTAGE RD 150TH ST W CEDAR AVE 150TH ST W x 2 L n U J 4 • e 1b2 U 5 I VV 4- A- *tri SITE 1 1 2 1 LB P PD- LLJa 244 w > Q w 5ISTSTWPD- PD-541 244 JAV ivcjjj 1,10031.11....111.01** 1141],k, Y .1 dr 14.0.#111 WOH C., 1111 ; • rw , • 1331-1S 83A00 NIA is:IftvReto aiddV H)U SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS 0 1 E VALLEY • 14.-1 "kr. 14750 CEDAR AVENUE I,. • ',NI, • 0 cp NW Z Z Cr.) < 0 0 06uJ ›- Z 0 < LLI UJ -1 c*)ft z ,r. >.< Lu 0 0z NO :1-:....,LSNO0 80d inL.J., .." 3AV 0 0 a Lig PICO 14.11 1441 lirrig It ay. arwa, kuilvaAtiri Erik Y.11 ',NAB EEO woHo< al vlt S•YM 11.70,?„, NN,;/17-1 11'.1 A Ei n1 VA. 'Al :j„ Siall3dOkla 11)Unvi SI TE LE c,E1,1 D 0.1ZI a G A DATA SUMMARY Wir 211P ION - AL-VNIVI13d cL uJ a (5 i LI Fl - ! i .-iL I ftl 1; q 4 WallNdiPg Iii 4 ! h ' , t i i' $ ; .E1111 C-1, kiAfinAli2 § ifii ,i,Deeeeoeociceeeoeeee® :71,:c11111.2. e - L., .919191. • ' - • r". ALM (C "ON I-1 vs' ) 311143AY HVQ30 111.11.1. 0 •,•• l"'Ll.Lgs',V.11711.;t4rIA Cki.•_91 kdVM AVA.- 11,7111 '71 ..,17 m ",\•- "r7 "- • 1,10031.11.4.1. WOO 19. .144 .1 Nitt Y WOH Cre, 11111)1 NV Id ,1'...NNINiqi0 N N Crif .1 RIVJ •A A1ddV ftv3idoisd H)U 7.1 0 GRADING PLAN r NOLLOndiSNO0 80d 10,1 1 If Y '1 fr 1 Iii Pill '1 §F 6 ,1„ it ,tz ...if 1 1 = it r 11 r , 111' 1 !I 1! 1 111 1111 I ! 1 0 A4 I N ,1 ur 7' VI 51 If le 4 i 11 ;-I - It -1 g gl E iN 11 11 i! 111 1 11 i 11 1 11! 0! 1 11, r tirr6. .k.fri70, 41111tilL g z a 0 1, P4 2 1 a , • of, ••• LL: 0 I,. • ” N. • (EZON WV+S.0) BriNRAV INVORO I • ' , . 1 P t Ifili; I 15 i ! 1; , 4"! ! i !! 11141 I „ A - lo. i lair F ii II 1 ,, ; ; 14 i' ; 1 ii 1 1 V q Iiirq i ! !• p " 11 i III ' Y 1 - 1# iil ! 1 I ! v i i m Ma 115Tq i !!411 fg; - ill! as _ !I 1 A h 1 ;I il 1 li; v I i! Il 11 1 . . . § ielyii! t0 i i io 4 li li ij4 :ffi 004 0 4 ill;li! 11 111 ii 1 1 % tir 4 ;1 0 i 1n Orit . g 1111 li il NiO LSNO0 80 -LON - 1 61 11 tl, 0 ict LF • rra 1",. • II NI, • 01 2 , , . (CZ ON 1-1'‘IS'al IniN3NV .1,44.114 • . N" .111.11Th VIM Illi>11..31nOr 01.10 11K no 1140,1. .144 hor.r.r. .1 Nilo uni Y 44.001.14 =HO( 011111)I 4111VIIM F4 Nteld ]dVDSUNV SHId rdozid 11-1)1J 6 NOLLOriaLSNO0 Oi 1: ;'.4 . 4 111 3 a 1 1.1 ° " 3 tN § 11§ Vs' g •••••41., J !al 9 111. • "111 NI, • I v." 0111 ..,J810:615.6,, UL05,1,4.1[11,a • 069(zi6) .160.4 NA ."S WI,Jpetc,' Se133iNION3 S81NNVid 'El sewer 7 1VL11113d NYU[ ..Ja.A..driS UNV11. 171 Hf11,1HAV difi:130 OgZit,T • 11 :AI' 4' 1011111lb' 7.1 2714001 CI) 14 1.14 ±.1.1.1,e3 " PAI 11,1 1.9 11121Lilli POO ci Hi OPP AN J., JP IL L9c• 3.1,030.00N Avail/. . T310 3 .3 "WON 11NVri ON -HV)) tie tt 550 • 1.44 Dild pOid hi a ,C9 LLLLLLLLLII 440,141 r, -'' - NC LI. :.1) 11 L7 I_ SI'l al) - :iC 2 ioN - ,..... 11.4 _P.1, __ ~ _1V.S3JL/3...eld,,�^`---^ ' ^ 1 • 41, _ �/ it ^ ~~' 8 - ,.= Id I • .r..'...K s wc, 0 N a Raniolii-ibilv 4 ra ,41,1011, • NCLI.D1L7.1.Stliai ioN ..... 11.4 NIL 7. • SC , YVALK, # .# • 11.11.1. SNOI ' VA313 NO16131X4 1110 0,4 Plin ',Tn. 3nd. < 11V13N S31183d08d HoNntri ,PE 11111 111111111Hr , 4444,44,4.44.444444. 111 t 11 4 11 • VIM MI. AM, WA. 11K no 1140,4. riki4 hipirYt. .1 Nihr,t kdii Inv Y 44,1001.14 WOH Cre, 11111)1 LV tld H)1.1 )110r*; LSNOO 810 ,L,IVN11.11113:1d = .un 1.1.• 1.11. I,. • NI, • (CZ 'ON IHYO) fiNAAV VC130 • • .1, • . 4 - - _ _ 1.3 WthiO ^^~ .1 1r Wiel,CON WOH _ '' -_- ,D1W!N 1,1 11, _ J z10_yLS`OO 84:) ^I°.11,61113:1= NaN • ` ` 1` ~~ ' 4 _, 0041 '. -- ;i (EZ rON 11.1YS10) 311N3AV b'VCI30 . -_. --_ _ °. 1.1. l611,1.11.. 01.1441.4 a 11441 /1PrigIl®ay. arwa, UJOH <<< al I}] VI# i tinirriSO Fern 7,610 SVM • 11 I flV-3 .�.'IVY,. Ei 1Jki F,P J 3 d d a H)UflVI • ry ��W III' " �i "gym � r � . � mr 1: .s� � �r..G m 1 r�. �wr r a � � F■ s ..w � � rnu (EZ ON anNand avaa0 '"1 rli%a1 1.11.. fir. L 01. a IliEV /1PrigIl®ay. arwa, UJOH <<< al I}] v ltinirriSO 1.1 .31,41, ,L:13:-°7141D4hV 7 SVM LIK44�C�.L'�I �] LuYFIJ. • Ei 1,1, F,P J 3 d d a H)UflVI n� r wA 111 111111. :uJa lii 1 r Jr JI ' (EZ ON V(9'0) anNand avaaO li , AEI SNOISIA.1 0 N WOO.N,10H-A31,11>FMMM L6,17-9179-1.99 :3N0Hcl 171499 NW Invd .1S '1,2C, 3±Ins ,S3M 311N3AV AllS,13AINI1 099, 'ONI ,31VIOOSSV CINV N,I0H-A311All>1 L1.0,© LIJOHOCalW! .°N 21.0,/tVG0 NVIA130,111M NVI,18 ,LOS3NNIVI JO 31V_LS 31d1 SMV -1 3H1H3CINIC1 H33NION3 -IVNOISS9JOHcl CI3SN901,1110 V WV I 1VH1 (INV NOISIAH3,1119 109HICI AlAl H3CINfl HO 901 A9 CIHVdDH., SVAA _LHOd9H HO NOI1V01,103. `NIVld SIH_LIVHIAJ11,130 AERH3H I AA 9 ',NM A9 CIDNOD-10 `n 9 A9 NMVHCI AA, a A9 CONSISDCI NMO HS SV ,Ivos 31VCI 0, V 1,00,L09 103r.d VHN NV -Id _LIS MAI `A311VA 3-IddV S311113d011d H)unv-i ET]] (T) SITE LEGEND TT D D BUILDING A DATA SUMMARY ±87,266 SF (±2.00 AC) RTY R D --Y (_2 LANN EV NT LANN EV NT ALONG 147TH STREET= 10' ALONG GLAZIER= 10' ci) KEYNOTE LEGEND SITE PLAN NOTES PAVEMENT MARKING. 4" SOLID VVHITE NOI-7-- „ ,L1 1 Li „6.41 AHliII3nHisNHod -LON:VNIA11-1eld ? L -Y fiLl ° Lu,) n LL:i L° :jaj ij))cl c! b Lcn Ttjj lj 111 1 1 PI: Hc! !LL! b 1! g h LILL Hil H c,it-4q)) (-6 4 MONUMENT SIGN. FOR REFERENCE ONLY. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY. OS0899800e®Gcxxxxxxxxxxx) ®080 1)11//1 4/2b70 • _ . 0 N a D ° .49.64 4 3..6g.EL .90 00N " (EZ 'ON 'H'V'S'0) DflNIDAV HVCI30 D -17-1,L2Z1. 'ON .00C1 ,I3c1 1N31^13SV3 AVMHOIH ONV 1176.LZ 1. 'ON .00CI 'oeL 'ON cIVW AVM -JO -11,018 CIVO8 ,Nnoo .0,1 `9.1,P099V Pu. uJoH,.1.1,1 01 ,111,1,1 3,1 1,19 'pi, `9.11,099V P. uJoH-,.1,11,1 uolloldoPP P. uolloz!JoLlIn. u.111J. ;nog,. lu.uJnooP 9,11 uo J.doJduJ! P. lo .P.Jod.Jd 9Pm 1! L10,1. Jol lu.!10 Pu. .90dJ. Jol ,luo P.Pu.lul 9! ,PIAJ.9 lo lu.LunJ19u! . . `ul.J.L1 P.Tu.9.Jd 9u,!9.P P. 91d.PuoP .L11 UT!. J.,11.501 `lueuinPoP 9,11 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF APPLE VALLEY AMENDING CHAPTER 155 --APPENDIX F ARTICLE 2, OF THE CITY CODE REGULATING PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 290 The City Council of Apple Valley Ordains: Section 1. The City of Apple Valley official zoning map is amended to re -designate the zoning for the following property from Planned Development Designation No. 290, Zone 1 to Planned Development Designation No. 290, Zone 5: Lot 1 Block 2, APPLE VALLEY COMMERCIAL ADDITION Section 2. Apple Valley City Code, Chapter 155, Appendix F, Article 2, is amended by adding Section A2-2 (E) to read as follows: § A2-2 PERMITTED USES. (E) Zone 5: Within this zone, no structure or land shall be used, except for one or more of the following uses or uses deemed similar by the City Council: (1) Any permitted use specified for Zone 4, except retail business uses. Notwithstanding retail business uses are not permitted, accessory and ancillary retail sales of any service or any product, goods or material produced at or related to the principle use on site is a permitted use, provided retail sales are subordinate to the principle use; the gross floor area used for the retail sales is not more than 15 percent of the total gross floor area of the principle use; and the retail sales are owned and operated solely by the principle user/occupant of the subject site. Section 3. Apple Valley City Code, Chapter 155, Appendix F, Article 2, is amended by adding Section A2-3 (D) to read as follows: § A2-3 CONDITIONAL USES. (D) Zone 5: Within this zone, no structure or land shall be used for the following use or uses deemed similar by the City Council except through the granting of a conditional use permit: (1) Any conditional use specified for Zone 4. Section 3. Apple Valley City Code, Chapter 155, Appendix F, Article 2, is amended by revising Section A2-4 to read as follows § A2-4 PERMITTED ACCESSORY USES. Zones 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. Within these zones, the following uses or uses deemed similar by the City Council shall be permitted accessory uses: Section 4. Apple Valley City Code, Chapter 155, Appendix F, Article 2, is amended by revising Section A2-5 (A)(1) to read as follows: § A2-5. MINIMUM BUSINESS AREA STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS. (A) The following standards and requirements shall be met. No improvements shall be placed on such lands unless the lands to be so used or improved shall meet the following minimum area and dimensional requirements: (1) Table of minimum area requirements and standards. MINIMUM BUSINESS AREA STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR DESIGNATION NO. 290 2 Zone 2 Zone 1 "1" Uses X411 Other Uses Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Minimum Lot Dimensions Lot area (square feet) 10,000 10,000 130,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Lot width (feet) 100 100 150 100 100 100 Minimum Building Setbacks Along principal or minor arterial streets (feet) 40 40 60 40 40 20 Along all other streets (feet) 30 30 60 30 30 20 Side lot line (feet) 10 10 10 10 10 10 Rear lot line (feet) 20 20 20 10 20 20 Abutting R district (feet) 20 -- -- -- 20__ Minimum Parking Setbacks Along principal or minor arterial streets (feet) 20 1 20 15 20 5 5 Along all other streets (feet) 20 20 15 20 10 10 Side or rear lot line (feet) 5 5 5 5 5 5 Abutting R district (feet) 10 -- -- -- 10__ Maximum Building Coverage Coverage of lot (percentage) 20 20 30 20 20 20 Maximum Building Height Maximum height (feet) 30 30 45 30 30 35 If all minimum setbacks are increased by ten feet (feet) 45 45 -- -- -- 45 If minimum setbacks are -- -- -- 100 -- __ 2 increased 11/2 feet for every one foot over 30 feet and a minimum building separation of one-half times the combined height of adjacent building faces is maintained (feet) Minimum Retail Floor Area Initial building (square feet) -- -- 20,000 -- -__ - Dwelling Unit Density/ Oneortwostory __ __ 3,960 (11)** __ ____ Three or four story -- -- 2'72�� (16)** -- --__ Sign Setbacks Along principal or minor arterial streets (feet) *** *,:* *** *** 5 ,:*,: NOTES TO TABLE Square feet on land per unit. ** Units per acre. '*" As required in Chapter 154 of the City Code, Sign Regulations 1 The parking lot setback may be reduced to ten feet when the one-half right-of-way dedication of the principal or minor arterial street is a minimum of 90 feet. Section 5. Summary approved. The City Council hereby determines that the text of the summary marked "Official Summary of Ordinance No. , a copy of which is attached hereto, clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance. The City Council further determines that publication of the title and such summary will clearly inform the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance. Section 6. Filing. The City Clerk shall file a copy of this ordinance in her office, which copy shall be available for inspection by any person during regular office hours. Section 7. Publication. The City Clerk shall publish the title of this ordinance and the official summary in the official newspaper of the City with notice that a printed copy of the ordinance is available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk. Section 8. Effective date. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication of its title and official summary. 3 PASSED by the City Council this th day of , 2018. ATTEST: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk 4 Mary Hamann -Roland, Mayor CITY OF APPLE VALLEY ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF APPLE VALLEY AMENDING CHAPTER 155 --APPENDIX F ARTICLE 2, OF THE CITY CODE REGULATING PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 290 The following is the official summary of Ordinance No. approved by the City Council of Apple Valley on , 2018. Lot 1 Block 2, APPLE VALLEY COMMERCIAL ADDITION, addressed as 14750 Cedar Avenue, is re -designated from Zone 1 to Zone 5 of Planned Development Designation No. 290. Apple Valley City Code, Chapter 155 Appendix F, Article 2 governing Planned Development Designation No. 290 is amended by adding setbacks and area requirements for Zone 5 in the table Minimum Business Area Standards and Requirements for Designation No. 290. A printed copy of the ordinance is available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk at the Apple Valley Municipal Center, 7100 - 147th Street West, Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124. Neighborhood Correspondence From: Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2018 11:56 AM To: Murphy, Joan Subject: Notice For Public Hearing - 14750 Cedar Avenue Ladies and Gentlemen, We support the proposed site amendments and the conditional use permit as proposed by the petitioner, Launch Properties, LLC, and property owner, CJ Ryan, LLC, in the notice we received dated May 14, 2018. Thank you. Lawrence A. Stovern Regional President Merchants Bank, N.A. 114990 Glazier Avenue 1AppleValley, MN 55124 Direct Phone: Internal Extension: 1 Fax: Email: City of Apple11 MEMO Building Inspections TO: Kathy Bodmer, Planner FROM: George Dorn, Building Official DATE: May 30, 2018 SUBJECT: Ryan Real Estate 14750 Cedar Avenue • Separate sign permits are required. • SAC determination is required from Met Council prior to permit issuance from the city. • Submit plans to the Department of Health if food is being served prior to permit issuance from the city. • A separate sewer and water permit is required prior to connection from the city services to the building. The State of Minnesota Plumbing Division is required to review the water and sewer utilities. The City of Apple Valley will issue the permit. • Geotechnical report boring log and Special Inspector Agreement is required prior to permit and soil corrections on site. • Per MSBC 2015 1303.1500 Subpart 1 requires recycling space in accordance with Table 1- A on plans issued for permit. Concept 1 does not appear to have any trash or recycling area. • A separate demolition permit is required prior to removal of the existing building. The demolition permit application must include a copy of the EPA inspectors' report, a copy of notification of intent to perform a demolition, a site plan showing building to be removed and the location of sewer and water services to the buildings. CITYOF Applell Valley MEMO Public Works TO: Kathy Bodmer, Planner FROM: Brandon S. Anderson, City Engineer DATE: June 14, 2018 SUBJECT: Ryan Real Estate Redevelopment at 147th and Cedar Avenue Kathy, The following are comments regarding the Ryan Real Estate Redevelopment Preliminary Plans dated May 24, 2018 and Site Plan Revisions dated June 12, 2018. Please include these items as conditions to approval. General 1. Provide a narrative of how the buildings will be constructed and any impacts prior to building permit authorization. The narrative shall include the following: a. Shoring (if applicable) b. Material Storage. c. Haul routes to and from the site. d. Phasing e. Construction and temporary parking 2. A separate Public Improvement project is being considered for the recommended transportation/traffic improvements on 147th Street and Glazier Avenue. a. The recommended improvements could include: i. Converting the intersection of 147th Street SW & Glazier Avenue (south) to a 3/4 access intersection where the NB left turn movement is prohibited. ii. Reconfigure Glazier Avenue at 147th with raised median and striping to provide only one approach lane (right turn lane). iii. Construct a roundabout at the intersection of 147th street SW and Glazier Avenue (north) iv. Construct a raised concrete median between Cedar Avenue and Glazier Avenue (south) along 147th street. This would prohibit all left turn movements in and out of the Applebee's driveway access. 3. Modifying the proposed right -in only access to a full access should be evaluated as an option upon completion of Public Improvements as outlined above. 4. An underground infiltration system construction and maintenance agreement will be required. 5. Additional Road Easement and/or ROW would be needed in the NE corner of site to accommodate public roadway improvements as recommended on 147th Street and Glazier. Site/Traffic 1. See additional memo from SRF regarding the review of the traffic study as provided by applicant. 2. The proposed land use is expected to have approximately 3,475 daily trips as compared to the existing site which currently generates approximately 340 trips. 3. A review of the interim conditions was completed to understand how the site would operate under a full build out scenario prior to any Public Improvement Projects along 147th Street, which includes a restricted thee -quarter access at Glazier Avenue (south) and a roundabout at Glazier Avenue (north). Results of preliminary tests conclude that there is expected to be average northbound queues along Glazier Avenue of approximately 100 feet and 95th percentile queues of approximately 200 feet during the midday peak hour. It is estimated that queues would extend beyond the northern enter only access point only 10 percent of the peak hour. It should be noted that northbound left -turn delays from Glazier to 147th Street are expected to increase from 16 seconds per vehicle in the year 2019 no build condition to 33 seconds per vehicle, which represents a side -street (Glazier and 147th Street) Level of Service (LOS) D condition. 4. The recommended changes to the turn lanes on 147th and Glazier are deemed acceptable at this time to provide additional storage during the peak hours 5. Site plan should show site line triangles at access entrances as well as on the landscape P lan. 6. Auto turn drawing should include review of prohibited NB left turn at north RI access driveway to site. Driveway alignment may need to be adjusted to ensure right in access only. Additional no Exit Signage is recommended. 7. A commercial driveway entrance is required at all access points to public roadways per AV Plate No. STR-4 or STR-5. Standard city plates should be referenced on plans. 8. An existing sidewalk currently exists connecting to the property to the south. No future connection is shown on the plans. Please clarify is sidewalk is to remain or be removed. 9. A streetscape plan will be required for restoration of public sidewalk, fence, and street lights along 147th street where the existing driveway access is to be abandoned if constructed privately. Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control 1. Final Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be included with plans and shall be reviewed and approved by City Engineer. 2. Final Grading Plans shall be reviewed and approved by City Engineer. 3. Final Storm Water Management Plan shall be reviewed and approved by City Engineer. Sanitary Sewer, Water Main and Storm Sewer 4. Final locations and sizes of Sanitary & Storm Sewer and Water main shall be reviewed with the final construction plans and approved by City Engineer. 5. Domestic water and Fire service shall be split outside the building and the valves shall be located 1.5 times the height of the building away from the building or placed in location readily accessible per City of Apple Valley standard detail plate SER -6. 6. C5.0 - Note pointing to Sanitary sewer service line states connect to existing water main stub 7. Confirm the size of the sanitary sewer stub from the street to ensure adequate size for proposed land use. 8. Abandon existing water service at the main in the street if not adequately sized to use existing service. New service would require wet tab. Landcape and Natural Resources 1. Final locations and sizes of trees and landscaping shall be reviewed with the final construction plans and approved by Natural Resource Coordinator. 2. A tree demo plan shall be provided, if any trees are to remain along Glazier Avenue a tree preservation plan should identify the drip line and protected throughout construction. Plans should clearly identify the removals. 3. Landscape plan should clearly indicate drainage and utility easements and property line. 4. No major tree plantings shall be located over any underground utilities. Clusters of trees shall be used near or around these areas instead of planting in a row. The Drainage and Utility Easement will require clearance around the underground utilities, or the expectation that trees may have to be removed for access when needed. 5. The 13 existing elm trees in public right-of-way along Cedar Avenue and 147th Street W shall not be impacted by construction, parking, or deliveries. If damaged a 2.5" caliper replacement shall be required in addition to the proposed re -plantings on the property. The City shall be notified of damage as soon as it occurs and to have a replacement species approved. 6. No plantings shall create sight distance issues at entrances, exits, or intersections. 7. Existing elms and Ring Route trees to be protected throughout construction. An additional Oak shall not be inter -planted along Cedar Ave as proposed. 8. Boulevard Lindens are a more narrow species than other varieties of lindens, but when full size will still be 25'-30' wide each. The parking islands may be better suited to other tree varieties. 9. Currently there are five large established evergreens on site. Three of the evergreens on the northeast corner could be saved and counted towards the tree preservation. a. No evergreen trees are included in the proposed landscape schedule, only evergreen shrubs. To: From: Date: Subject: I im ary SRFNo. 11833.00 Brandon Anderson, PE, City Engineer City of Apple Valley Tom Sachi, PE, Senior Engineer Matthew Pacyna, PE, Principal June 14, 2018 Review of Redevelopment Site - Cedar Avenue at 147th Street Traffic Impact Study action As requested, SRF has completed a review of the Redevelopment Site - Cedar Avenue at 147th Street Traffic Impact Study document, dated May 24, 2018 completed by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. The proposed development is located in the southeast quadrant of the Cedar Avenue/147th Street intersection in the City of Apple Valley. Review of the traffic impact study identified the following questions and comments for consideration. Based on our review, the following items were identified. Underlined text indicates potential study modification considerations. 1. Site Trip Generation - The trip generation estimate approach using the Institute ofTransportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition is reasonable for the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. However, the midday peak hour trip generation shown is lower than the peak hour of generator for fast -casual restaurants, which is the midday peak hour (12:00 p.m. to 1:00 p.m.). This peak hour of generator rate from ITE is consistent with locally- collected trip generation data. The midday peak hour trip generation analysis should be updated using the peak hour of generator trip generation rate to determine level of service and queuing impacts. 2. Trip Distribution and Assignment - The directional distribution is reasonable. 3. Intersection Capacity Analysis a. The analysis approach and existing condition results are reasonable. b. While not specifically noted in the document, the build out and horizon background analysis appears to have used a background growth rate of one (1) percent, which is consistent with historical trends within the area and the Dakota County 20 -year growth project factor (typical growth is between 0.5 and 1.5 percent growth per year). This approach is reasonable, however, the growth rates should be noted within the Build -Out Background Analysis section. c. Midday peak hour conditions should be updated with the peak hour generator trip generation. d. The horizon year build capacity analysis is noted that all intersections are anticipated to have an acceptable overall LOS, however, the Cedar Avenue and 147th Street intersection is anticipated to have a LOS E during the p.m. peak hour. ONE CARLSON PARK\F%AY, SUITE 150 MINNEr1POLIS, MN 55447 %63.4%5.0010 .SRPCONSULTINCG.00M Brandon Anderson, PE, City of Apple Valley Redevelopment Site - Cedar Avenue at 147th Street Traffic Impact Study Review June 13, 2018 Page 2 4. Turn Lane Analysis a. It is noted to restripe the westbound left -turn lane at the Cedar Avenue and Glazier Avenue intersection, which should be modified to the Cedar Avenue and 147th Street intersection. The recommended restriping of the westbound left -turn lane on 147th Street to Cedar Avenue is reasonable and should be considered. b. Existing queues are not provided within the Turn Lane Queue Summary tables. This could provide a comparison to baseline conditions. c. Year 2030 Horizon analysis indicates the average and 95th percentile northbound left -turn queues at Glazier Avenue/147th Street under build conditions are 115 feet and 190 feet, respectively. The northern site access, which is right -in only, as well as the Wing's Financial driveway should not be impacted by the northbound left -turn queue. The midday peak hour condition should be updated to determine if there are additional queuing impacts that mai- extend to the southern site access or beyond, which could cause internal site operational issues. d. The recommended restriping of the northbound left -turn lane on Glazier Avenue to 147th Street is reasonable and could be considered, as an interim improvement condition prior to the public improvement project. This turn lane should accommodate northbound left - turning queues from 147th Street, pending any findings from a midday analysis. 5. Conclusions and Recommendations — This section may be updated based on the recommendation to reanalyze the midday peak hour trip generation and intersection capacity analysis. If midday queuing is expected to impact the southern driveway or adjacent driveways further to the south, discussions may need to occur with area stakeholders during the interim condition prior to the public improvement project. Addition'TripGt pariso' SRF developed an updated trip generation estimate using the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 70th Edition to understand differences between the proposed land uses and both the existing land uses and the current zoning allowable maximum square footage for a Class 1 restaurant space (i.e. —11,.000 square feet). In general, Class 1 restaurant spaces are formal sit down restaurants with menus or can be casual sit down restaurants that meet a number of criteria (i.e. fast casual). Class 1 restaurant spaces do not have drive-thru capabilities. Results of the trip generation comparison between the land use application and the existing land uses is shown in Table 1. This indicates that the peak hour trips are expected to increase significantly as compared to the existing land use. Additionally, it should be noted that the proposed land use is expected to have approximately 3,475 daily trips as compared to the existing site, which currently generates approximately 340 daily trips. Note the trip generation comparisons include the peak hour of generator for the midday trip generation. Brandon Anderson, PE, City of Apple Valley Redevelopment Site - Cedar Avenue at 147th Street Traffic Impact Study Review Table 1 Trip Generation Comparison (Existing Land Uses) Land Use Type (ITE Code) Size Weekday A.M Peak Hour Trips Weekday M.D. Peak Hour Trips June 13, 2018 Page 3 Weekday P.M Peak Hour Trips In out In out In out Land Use Application Coffee Shop w/ Drive Through (937) 1,800 sf 82 78 34 33 39 39 Fast -Casual Restaurant (930) 6,000 sf 8 4 121 142 47 38 Medical -Dental Office (720) 3,000 sf 7 2 7 4 3 7 Total 97 84 162 179 89 84 Existing Site Office Space 9,900 sf 15 5 3 5 16 18 Trip Difference +82 +79 +159 +174 +73 +66 Results of the trip generation comparison with the Class 1 maximum square footage of 11,000 sf, shown in Table 2, indicate that there is expected to be significantly more a.m. peak hour trips. However, midday peak hour trips are expected to be reduced by approximately 30 percent and p.m. peak hour trips increase by approximately 10 percent as compared to the maximum allowable Class 1 restaurant space. Additionally, the proposed land uses and the Class 1 maximum use are expected to have a similar amount of daily trips. Table 2 Trip Generation Comparison (Class 1 Max) Land Use Type (ITE Code) Size Weekday A.M Peak Hour Trips Weekday M.D. Peak Hour Trips Weekday P.M Peak Hour Trips In Out In Out In out Land Use Application Coffee Shop w/ Drive Through (937) 1,800 sf 82 78 34 33 39 39 Fast -Casual Restaurant (930) 6,000 sf 8 4 121 142 47 38 Medical -Dental Office (720) 3,000 sf 7 2 7 4 3 7 Total 97 84 162 179 89 84 Class 1 Maximum Allowable Fast -Casual Restaurant (930) 11,000 sf 15 8 222 260 85 Trip Difference +82 +76 (-60) (-g1) +4 70 +14 Brandon Anderson, PE, City of Apple Valley Redevelopment Site - Cedar Avenue at 147th Street Traffic Impact Study Review al June 13, 2018 Page 4 A review of the interim conditions was completed to understand how the site would operate under a full build out scenario prior to the public improvement projects along 147th Street, which includes a restricted thee -quarter access at Glazier Avenue (south) and a roundabout at Glazier Avenue (north). Note that this assessment includes the refined midday peak hour trip generation for the proposed development. Results of preliminary tests conclude that there is expected to be average northbound queues along Glazier Avenue of approximately 100 feet and 95th percentile queues of approximately 200 feet during the midday peak hour. It is estimated that queues would extend beyond the northern enter only access point only 10 percent of the peak hour. It should be noted that northbound left -turn delays are expected to increase from 16 seconds per vehicle in the year 2019 no build condition to 33 seconds per vehicle, which represents a side -street level of service D condition. The recommended turn -lane length for this turn -lane is 190 feet of storage of a 50 foot taper. This turn -lane storage would be adequate for approximately 90 to 95 percent of the midday peak hour and is expected to be adequate for both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Therefore, no other geometric or traffic control improvements are necessary during the interim condition. MI111111111 ,,,,,,,,,,,,,111111,11111111111111111111111111111111.1. 00 0 CNI Id 1 • Id 1 ■ liTO FAT11FAN6 ITITZTCR 0 U N CD0 b1a) a) 0 •i a) W 00 0 N 4� -peunionats wo...u!-..mmm OOLZ.9,9.Z,9 ,0,9g eTosau,,, `suodeauum, 0,Z ol!nS OAV uoTbuNsem EEC ONI `DdruoD_LIHm,iv ira ,1013V,11NO3 1.113 9S :Aq WM/9 :.T.CI NO11011H_LSNO0 HOd LON- eu, ----=!!srAzdns:Jociec:11,..,azi::111 :OTBC1 :anssi 1DAD1 - NV1d HOOld 11V131:1 S311t13d0Nd HONflv \ /11 wff ..0 /„0 ..0 NO11011.1SNO0 ION Al '5) no - ID Ji , - 3 / - .9 g°- 11A13 lvanionuis rC1 NOLOVN.00 .3110 N011OnaLsNioo HOd _LON- 9S :Aq pa>paq, dg uma, 91,17,9 :01eCI 9E0-8, :#10.10,1 :aTea :anssi CO SNOLLVAD-ID HOIHD_XD CO 11V131:1 S311t13dat. IoNn v F a_ - .9Z VIEWOF SOUTHWEST CORNER w z 1,3 z I0 geri 101 iII '1 11 IMMENLIMMI IJ WEST EXTERIOR ELEVATION SOUTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION 11311211 11 EAST EXTERIOR ELEVATION 5 Oa 1••• 000 ITEM: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: SECTION: 6.A. June 20, 2018 Other Business Description: The Shores Townhomes - Sketch Plan Review of a Proposed 96 -Unit Townhome Project - PCI 8-1 6-ZB Staff Contact: Thaomas Lovelace, City Planner Department / Division: Community Development Department Applicant: Pulte Homes of Minnesota, LLC and Rockport, LLC Applicant Date: 60 Days: Project Number: PCI 8-1 6-ZB 120 Days: ACTION REQUESTED: No official action is needed. The owner wishes to receive feedback concerning a proposed 96 -unit townhome project. It is recommended that the Planning Commission not state specifically whether or not they would approve or deny the request, but rather, identify the specific zoning questions or issues they might have with the proposed project. A sketch plan review is an informal review by City Staff and the Planning Commission of a proposed development project, e.g. comprehensive plan amendment, rezoning, subdivision, or a commercial/multiple-family building permit. It gives the Planning Commissioners an opportunity to become familiar with a proposed project prior to a public hearing or formal action. The project developer receives feedback from the Commissioners prior to the preparation and expense of the detailed plans that must be submitted for formal consideration and approval. SUM MARY: Pulte Homes of Minnesota, LLC is requesting feedback on a proposed 96 -unit townhome development project on 7.9 acres of property currently owned by Rockport, LLC. The site is located at the northeast corner of 157th Street West and Johnny Cake Ridge Road and is part of an over 400 -acre sand and gravel mining operation. The site is adjacent to the Quarry Ponds single-family residential development to the west, Fischer Sand and Aggregate mining area to the north, a future storm water ponding area and North Creek Greenway Trail corridor to the east, and the Regents Point single-family residential development to the south. Access to the site will be via private streets that will intersect with 157th Street West and Johnny Cake Ridge Road. The applicant has provided a ghost plat that shows a proposed development of an additional 215 townhome units on 17.8 acres located north of the 7.9 -acre site. An analysis of that proposal is not part of staffs review. However, many of the comments contained in this memo may be pertinent to the 17.8 -acre site. Any formal submittal for this proposed development plan will include at a minimum, a request for a rezoning, subdivision and site plan/building permit authorization. BACKGROUND: Comprehensive Plan: The existing 2030 Comprehensive Plan designates the site as "LD" (Low Density Residential/ 2-6 units per acre and "HD" (High Density Residential/12+ units per acre. The draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan designates the whole site as "HD". Low Density Residential areas are intended to create, preserve and maintain the places to live that define the primary character and identity of Apple Dalley. A variety of housing types may be built in Low Density residential areas including single-family detached dwellings, duplexes, twin homes, townhomes, and other types of attached housing. In the past, housing densities ranged from one-half to six units per acre. Today, the Land Use Plan places housing densities in the LD areas at three to six units per acre. High Density Residential areas include multiple -family structures (apartments and condominiums) at densities greater than twelve units per acre to the extent allowed by the zoning ordinance. Developments with densities of up to 40 units per acre are allowed in the areas within and adjacent to the downtown if certain performance standards in the zoning code are met. This designation fits with M-7, M-8 and PD zoning districts to the extent allowed when considered with parking, infiltration, lot coverage, and building setbacks. The proposed project will have a density of 12 units per acre, which is at the low end of "HD" designation and is at the high end to the "MD" (Medium Density Residential). "MD" land uses include townhomes, other attached single-family dwellings, and low-rise apartments and condominiums at densities that range between six and twelve units per acre. This designation fits with the M-4, M-5, M-6, and PD zoning districts. Options available to the developer to bring the site into compliance with the Comprehensive Plan would be to request an Comp Plan land use amendment re -designating the currently designated "LD" property to "HD" or wait until the final approval of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, which would have a "HD" designation on all of the proposed development site. Livable Communities Impact: The proposed multi -family development will provide 96 townhome dwelling units in its initial phase, with a potential of an additional 215 units in future phases. This development proposal will address the City' s Livable Communities Act (LCA) principles of adding a housing product that helps provide a balanced supply and variety of housing types for people of all income levels and lifecycle stages. Zoning: The property is currently zoned "SG" (Sand and Gravel), which allows limited agricultural pursuits, including crop and plant production and commercial greenhouses and nurseries as permitted uses and sand and gravel mining as a conditional use. The applicant is indicating that they would be requesting a rezoning of the 7.9 -acre site from "SG" to a "M-6" (Multi -Family Residential/6-12 units per acre). The "M-6" districts are intended for those areas which are designated for "medium density" in the comprehensive guide plan, where a moderately high density of townhouse or apartment dwelling units is expected. Property within these districts are characterized by relatively level topography, the minimal presence of significant mature vegetation and proximity to either neighborhood or community collector roads or to arterial roads. Area requirements within this zoning district include the following: • 40-75 feet from a community or neighborhood collector road. • 20 feet from a private drive. • 25-40 feet from any side or rear yard. • Minimum setbacks between sides of multi -residential buildings shall be 15 feet or a distance equal to half the combined height of the adjacent building faces, which ever is greater. • Minimum setbacks between the front or rear of multi -residential buildings shall be 50 feet or a distance equal to half the combined height of the adjacent building faces, which ever is greater. This would also apply to situations where a front or rear faces a side. • Maximum building height is 45 feet and maximum building coverage is 30%. • Maximum number of stories is three. Please note that multiple family zoning districts have three categories, A, B, and C, that dictate the setbacks. The A category has the greater setback requirements and the C category has the lesser requirements. For example, the building setback from a collector street in the A category is 75 feet, 50 in the B, and 40 in the C. Most of the multiple family residential development in the City fall in the C category. Site Plan: The site plan indicates the construction of eleven 4 -unit, eight 5 -unit, and two 6 - unit townhouse buildings on approximately 7.9 acres. The net density for this project will be 12 dwelling units per acre. Access to the dwelling units within the development will be via 24 -foot wide private streets that will intersect will 157th Street West and Johnny Cake Ridge Road. The 157th Street West intersection will have full access and the Johnny Cake Ridge Road intersection will have right in/right out only access. City code requires a minimum of one and one-half parking spaces and two garage spaces per townhouse dwelling unit. Each unit will have a minimum two -car garage with a driveway that will accommodate parking for two vehicles. Thirty guest parking spaces will be scattered throughout the site. Although the development will provide 4.3 parking spaces per unit, the number of available open parking spaces for guests appear to be deficient. Universally, the City requires that guest parking be provided at one-half space per dwelling unit. Based on that requirement, the development should have a minimum of 48 open parking spaces. The site plan indicates that the proposed buildings will be set back 15 feet from the east property line, Johnny Cake Ridge Road and 157th Street West; 15 feet from the private street and 10 feet from the north property line. The 2030 and draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan classifies Johnny Cake Ridge Road as major collector and 157th Street West as a minor collector. A minimum 40 -foot setback from these streets are required. The code also requires a minimum 25 -foot setback from a side or rear yard and a 20 -foot setback from a private street or drive. As stately previously, the plan also shows a 10 -foot setback from the north property line and the code requires a minimum setback of 25 feet. The applicant has submitted a concept plan, which shows the potential townhome development on the 17.8 acres north of the 7.9 -acre site. Therefore, the City may want to consider a reduced setback along the north property line at this time. A storm water ponding area and the North Creek Greenway Trail corridor will be located directly to the east of the property. Staff has been working on a variety of storm pond designs that will provide the needed storage and infiltration, as well as providing an aesthetic amenity within or adjacent to the trail corridor. A final ponding area and trail design should be part of any approval for the proposed townhome development. Elevation Drawings: The petitioner is proposing the construction of eleven 4 -unit, eight 5 - unit, and two 6 -unit townhouse buildings. The proposed primary exterior finish will be lap siding with a decorative roof treatment and decorative columns located at the entrances of each dwelling unit. The upgraded elevation (Elevation B) will have a masonry base on the entrance columns. The petitioner has attempted to break up the massing of the buildings through the use of such things as bay windows, decorative sills and headers, window shutters, and width of the lap siding. The front elevation will have a small covered stoop. Roof gables will also help break up the front elevation. The rear elevation has some minor undulation in an effort to break up its massing. Section 155.346 of zoning code requires that multiple residential buildings adjacent to R zones or occupied M zones shall have a vertical exposed exterior finish consisting of at least 50% non-combustible, non -degradable and maintenance -free construction materials (such as face brick or natural stone but excluding such construction materials as sheet aluminum, iron or concrete block of any kind or similar), with the balance being a non -manufactured natural construction material such as plank cedar or redwood. The zoning code does allow apartment or townhouse dwelling units to be constructed with exposed vertical exterior finish materials other than those provided under Section 155.346 as a conditional use when: 1. The proposed materials represent the same or similar materials used on at least 66.7% and of the existing buildings within 350 feet of the site. 2. The proposed materials are demonstrated to be of comparable grade and quality as those otherwise required. 3. The materials have the appearance of wood siding having a maximum plank width of 12 inches. Under no circumstance shall sheet or corrugated aluminum, iron, steel, asbestos, sheet plywood or similar materials be used which have no three-dimensional relief, nor shall plain or painted plain concrete block be used. Any decorative concrete block shall be colored only by means of a pigment impregnated throughout the entire block. Therefore, revisions to the exterior building materials will be needed to meet the requirements set forth in Section 155.36 of the code or a conditional use permit will need to be granted to allow for the exterior finish as proposed. Availability of Municipal Utilities: Public utilities to serve this site will be made via connections to the existing sanitary sewer and water main lines located in the 157th Street West and Johnny Cake Ridge Road rights-of-way. Final locations and sizes of sanitary and storm sewer line, and water main shall be reviewed with the final construction plans and approved by City Engineer. Sanitary sewer, water main and storm sewer utilities shall be publicly owned and maintained. A blanket drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated on final plat over all public infrastructure and common areas. Street Classifications/Accesses/Circulation:The site is bordered by future Johnny Cake Ridge Road, to the west and 157th Street West to the south. Johnny Cake Ridge Road is classified as a major collector with a design capacity of up 30,000 vehicle trips per day and 157th Street West is classified as a minor collector street with a design capacity of up to 15,000 vehicle trips per day. Private streets serving the proposed dwelling units will have one access only off of the two public streets. No direct access from the individual units to a public street is proposed nor would one be allowed. This proposed project will likely generate approximately 560 vehicle trips per day. The public street system adjacent to this site has been or will be adequately designed and constructed to accommodate the number of trips that will be generated by this proposed project. Private streets will provide vehicular access to and from the dwelling units, as well as circulation within the development. All the private streets been designed to provide adequate flow of vehicular traffic throughout the project area. The City Engineer has reviewed the submitted plans and he has the following comments: • Internal Streets shall be privately owned and maintained. Street width shall be a minimum of 24 feet wide (face to face) with no on street parking. • The right in/right out intersection onto Johnny Cake Ridge Road (JCRR) shall be additionally modified to include a "pork chop island" to prevent unauthorized turning movements out of the site at this location. • The site plan should indicate the intersection dimensions from the north and south property lines. • The proposed right-in/right-out on JCRR, north of 157th Street, should move 190 ft. north of the currently proposed location (this assumes 45 mph on JCRR north of 157th as consistent with the rest of the design on the corridor) . • A right turn lane into the site off JCRR shall be constructed in accordance with the Design of Turn Lane Guidelines, which will require 1:10 taper for 110 feet plus 205 feet of a full turn lane. • Residential developments along collector roadways commonly result in noise complaints. In order for noise levels from the highway to meet acceptable levels for adjacent residential units, substantial building setbacks, buffer areas, and other noise mitigation elements should be incorporated into this development. • The applicant should provide traffic impact study showing anticipated trips and distribution of traffic for determination of access needs. • Additional dimensions should be provided on site plan indicating radiuses, drive lane widths, etc... • An Auto turn drawing should be provided that show turning movements to verify site circulation and layout requirements for planned vehicle usage to be used onsite. • Show truck movement with Auto turn entering site to ensure emergency and service vehicle can maneuver internally. Pedestrian Access: The applicant is proposing a network of internal sidewalks with connections to sidewalks and pathways adjacent to public streets. Connections are proposed from the site to the future North Creek Greenway Trail, which will be located to the east the development. Sidewalks should be installed along both sides of the entrance drives and those sidewalks should connect with proposed sidewalks within the development and the pathways adjacent to the public streets. BUDGET IMPACT: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Applicant Letter Background Material Location Map Comp Plan Map Zoning Map Site Plan Elevations "THE SHORES" APPLICATION FOR: SKETCH PLAN PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA June 6, 2018 troduction Pulte Homes of Minnesota, LLC ("Pulite!') is pleased to be submitting this application for Land Use Guide Plan Amendment. Pulteis company vision is "Building Consumer Inspired Homes and Communities to Make Lives Better". We are a large homebuilder with corporate offices in Atlanta, Georgia. VVe currently operate under three distinct brands of omebuilding throughout the co ntry; Pulte Homes, Centex Homes, and Del Webb. Pultels Minnesota Division has an office i Eden Prairie. We will build approximately 550 homes in the Twin Cities in 2018, all under the Pulte Homes brand. Pulte will act as both developer of the property and budder of the homes within this residential development. The primary contact for Pulte is: Paul Heuer, Director of Land Planning & Entitlement 7500 Flying Cloud Drive, Suite 670 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 952-229-0722 iL fulte(;roup.com Owners, Addresses & Legal Descriptions Rockport LLC - Peter Fischer and Liza Robson Owner Address: 14698 Galaxie Avenue Apple Valley, MN 55124 Site Address: 15497 Pilot Knob Road Apple Valley, MN 55124 PIN: 01-03500-75-013 Legal Description: 35 115 20 N of SE ex pt platted as Regents Point ex pt platted Quarry Ponds Fourth Addition 1 Id Consumer pu 6dH01nes an k_urrirriuniiies to Make Lives Belie Key F cts • Existing zoning • 2030 Future Land Use Plan • Proposed zoning o Proposed uses o Area o Number of units • Gross density • Net density • Setbacks o Perimeter — ROW o Perimeter — to no o etween buildings SG Sand and Gravel High Density Residential (12+ units/acre) M-6 Multiple Family Residential District Attached tovvinho es — owner occupied 7.9 acres 96 12.2 units/acre 12.2 units/acre 15 feet h I 0 feet 20 feet We recognize that the City has ap roved numerous appkations for rental housing and senior housing in recent years. Our vision for this property is to create a new neighborhood that meets the demand for owner occupied townhomes, We anticipate attracting primarily young couples, young families, and singles who are seeking homeownership in an active and convenient location. Many property characteristics make this an ideal location for occupied townhomes: 1 There are many public parks and open space nearby, including Quarry Point Park to the sout east, Cobblestone Lake to the east, and Regatta Park to the west. A pedestrian tunnel beneath 157 St eet West is located immediately east of the property. 2. Strong access to regional transportation routes such as Pilot Knob Road, County Road 42, and State Highway 77 (Cedar Avenue). 3. Conveniently located near the 157' Street (Transit) Station. 4. Plentiful retail services just east of Pilot Knob Road and anticipated additional retail directly east of the neighborhood. 5'," A very strong school district. 6. Direct access to a future Dakota County regional trail immediately to the east: hese varous attributes make this iocation very attractive to owner occupied residents, 0111 Below is a description and photos of the housing product to be built at The Shores. This product is very attractive and versatile and has been very well received by the pubic. We have intentionally incorporated many design traits which miodmize the appearance and the livability of the neighborhood: 1. The most attractive side of the homes are the -fronts'. You will notice that we have intentionally displayed the fronts of buildings to face the east, so th, and vvest, all of which will be highly visible to the public. This results in a very attractive neighborhood. 2. If not oesigned correctly, attached/multifamily housing can appear like barracks. This occurs when the developer/builder lines up many uildings in a straight line. We work hard to create a constantly varying appearance by changing the orientation of the buildings. You will notice that we accomplish this by using various design tools. a. We angle buildings at southeast and southwest corners of the neighborhood. b. We've created a unique "pod" of buildings at the ighly visible intersection of Johnny Cake Ridge Road and 157' Streei, West. 0, We angled the internal street to change the orienta ion of the adjacent buildings. 3. We have woven green corridors through the neighborhood that act to connect omeowners to the perimeter trails. 4. We preserved open space at the main entrance o 157 Street West to provide a pleasant experience for all homeowners. This entrance will set the tone for the neighborhood so we consciously designed it to be beautiful and welcoming. The entrance will be lushly landscaped. . Our main entrance also includes a carefully designed "view corridor-. When the entrance drive ends at a intersection, drivers will see open space in front of them, including a fire pit that will act as a central social gathering place. The above design strategies and tools will result in a neig borhood that is attractive from the outside and will live well from the insise. People typically cannot articulate what they like about a ne( hborhood, but they know if when they see it and feel it. We've become skilled at understanding how to create neighborhoods that "feel good". It is worth noting that we went through the exercise of creating a "ghost plat for the property to the north to show what the neighborhoo could look like if in the future it is expanded. Please note that we continue to have variations in building orientation and we have continued to have green corridors through the neighborhood. A key part of creating new neig borhoods is understanding our customers and anticipating their desires. This property is blessed with a very strong location, surrounded by a variety of recreational, retail, and convenience oriented amenities. One area where it is tacking is a private, social gathering place. This is an important priority for many of our customers, and the size of the neighborhood is large enough to economically sustain such an amenity. Although details remain to be worked out, we are planning the construction of a fire pit gathering area that will be owned and maintained by the neighborhood homeowner's association. Attached to tnis narrative you will find an example graphic of the fire pit itself. We anticipate surrounding the fire pit with hard and soft landscaping to accentuate the fire pit and enhance the general at °sphere. We have inten ionally located the fire pit gathering area at the highly visible main entrance area to add beauty and maximize neighbor interactions. The above referenced ghost plat shows what could occur in the future if the neighborhood expands to the north. If that occurs, we will evaluate whether to add more private amenities. The Ho es Background For a variety of reasons, very few townhomes were built after the real esta e crash segan ir 2007. Pulte and other builders are ow venturing back into the townhome market. Given the long time span since rowhomes have commonly been built, the market environment has changed significantly, including the tastes an needs 0 the buying public. 1 response, Pulte has completed in-depth consumer surveys and designed what could be considered "version 2,0' for rowhomes. "Version 1.0" Rowho e rc art ie One of the primary drivers of sales for rowhomes is that it ex ands the range of consumers who can afford home ownership, In "version 1.0. this was typically accomplished by having many exterior units being identical in appearance. A common theme was that some or most of the units within a building would have the same exterior elevation. Another common theme was to have the same color scheme or two alternating color schemes for all individual units. rsion 2. R w 1 itect re With Pulte's version 2.0, our goal is to maintain affordability, but to improve on the historical rowhome architectural themes. Our overall approach is to -individualize and stylize" each unit. The result is individual units which differ in architecture from all other units within the same building and which vary in color scheme. This is a signlicant advancement in the approach to rowhome architecture. Our new rowhorne incorporates the .following individualizing features: a, Considerable number of and varyini orientation of windows providing interest to the exterior and transparency and daylighting on the interior b. Windows and building corners are wrapped with trim c. Several types of gables d. Pediments and brackets within the gables to add interest e. Window shutters f. Porches g. Roof pitch (8:12) to accommodate optional bedroom, loft, and/or rooftop terrace options h. Horizontal banding boards between floors to ad, variety and differentiation i. Articulation of each unit; each unit is offset in depth from the adjacent units by two feet; this creates shadows which visually -break up" the f ont of the building j. Varied color scheme for each unit and for most units within our community (for example, a separate community with this product was recently designed to have 25 out of 36 units with assorted color schemes; we anticipate similar individualization in this community) k. The option of a rooftop terrace will positively impact the rear elevations of some units The result is that each unit will appear unique and distinct within each bui[ling and to a substantial degree within the new community. Attached you 'will find photos of the buildings that we will construct in The Shores. Elevation A represents the above architectural description. To provide architectural variation throughout the neighborhood, we will also be constructing buildings with Elevation B. Elevation includes, a variety of upgrades such as cultured stone, change in siding orientation on the side elevations, "bump outs", dormers, adlitional windows. etc. Below are elevations for A and B. Together, the combination of buildings with Elevations A and B will result in a very attractive neighborhood. l'Ani6M6E, Elevation A 111111111111111111111111,,,II,.,, Elevation B We encourage you to visit Brooks idge in Chaska to gain a fuller understanding of how the neighborhood will look with this combination of architectural combinations. Brooks Ridge is currently under construction, but nu erous buildings with each elevation have been completed. Inn va roach to e Io�r Plans We realize that the City is primarily interested in exterior architecture. However, it is worth notin that our approach to "individualized and stylized" rowhome u its extends to the interior as well. uyers are also able to choose from a range of options that are not typically seen in version 1. floor plans: a. 3 bedrooms with options for a 4th and even a 5th bedroom b. 2 car garages with an option for a 3rd c. Two owner suites d. Loft e. Rooftop terrace f. lst floor flex room and additional bathroom g. We believe that floor plan versatility and individualization at the scale offered with this design is unmatched in the Twin Cities market. S mar kNe take our mission statement seriously: zuilding Consumer Inspired Homes and Communities to Make Lives Better." We spend a considerable amount of time and effort designing our floor plans, architectural exteriors and eve detail of the layout of our neighborhoods. It is our hope that our efforts on The Shores is evide t. We are confident that this new neighborhood will be very well received by the City and the buying public. We look forward 0 having the opportunity to make this vision become a reality. This submittal c • Land Use application This narrative Sketch Plan Sketch Plan showing ghost plat for property to the north Bu//ding photos Example Horne Features Brooks Ridge Chaska, MN Community Close to Charming Downtown Chaska • Association Maintained Living Exterior Interior 1Citchcn Baths Energy Savine-,s Freedom Series Included Home Features Paneled Steel Insulated 1/4 Lite Entry Door • Low Maintenance Wood Grain Vinyl Siding • Low Maintenance Aluminum Soffit & Fascia • 3 -Car, Fully Drywalled, Attached Garage 7Tall Steel Sectional Garage Door • 2 Exterior Weatherproof GFCI Electrical Outlets • 91 Ceilings on Main Leve • Sherwin -Milan -Ise Interior Fiat Latex Paint • Stately Raised Panel White Doors • Pre -finished White illwork • Mohawk® Vinyl Flooring in Foyer • LED Lighting • 36" Aristokraft® Birch Kitchen Cabinets • Pantry for Extra Storage • Stainless Steel \Alhiripoolt Self -Cleaning Ceramic -Top Range • Stainless Steel Whirlpooi0 Microwave • Stainless Steel Whirlpool® ENERGY STAR Qualified DIshwasher • Whirlpool® Heavy Duty 1/3 HP Disposer • Kohler/Sterling® Vikrell0 Bath/Shower • Mohawk® Vinyl Flooring • Moen® Chrome Faucets • Low E White Vinyl Windows • Honeywell®, Programmable Energy Saving Digital Thermostat • 50 Gallon Energy Saving Electric Water Heater • Community is within the Scenic MN River Valley • Less than 2 Miles from Hazeltine Golf Course Exterior Hose Bib • Fully Sodded. Irrigated and Landscaped Yard Asphalt Driveway • Schlage® Exterior Door Hardware in Satin Nickel 1 Garage Door Opener with 2 Transmitters • Shaw® Carpet in Choice of Color Schlage® Interior Door Hardware n Satin Nicke‘ Naples Textured Ceiring Throughout Home ▪ Low Voltage Starter Package w. 1 Phone & 1 Cable Jack • Fire Suppression System • Mohawk® Vinyl Flooring Wilsonarle Laminate Countertops • Moen® Single Handle Faucet ▪ Waterline 'Rough-ln" for Future Ice Maker • Ground -Fault Circu!t Interrupter (GFCI) Electrical Outlet • USB Outlet Cultured Marble Vanity lops Pedestal Sink n Powder Bath Lennox® Deluxe High Efficiency 92% Direct Vent Gas Furnace Lennox® 13 SEE Central Air Conditioning • Energy Recovery Ventilator Homeowners Speak. W 1117Ired Ideas = Life Tested° Humes. Pulteaco Pulte Homes reserves the right to malice specification, plan. anclior pricing changes without prior notice or obligation. Standard features and options are subject to change and vary per plan. Subject to errors, changes and omissions_ Life Tested® is a trademark of PN II, Inc_ ©2017 Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC, All rights reserved. BL#BC627273, 10.6.17 Brooks Ridge Chaska, MN Qualitv Construction Protection Plan Pulte Owner's Entry Freedom Series Included Home Features • Poured Concrete Insulated Foundation Walls Structurally Engi eered Floor Joists & Roof Trusses • Pex Corrosion Resistant Plumbing System • R-49 Attic Insulation Value • Spray Foam Rim Insulation • yparS House Wrap on Exterior Thv&ope of Horne for Air/Water Resistance • Sealed Interior Vapor and Air Barrier to Reduce Air Infiltration • Double Wall Construction on Common Wails 1. Workmanship and Material for 1 Year 2. Mechanical Systems for 2 Years • 2x6 Exterior Walls with R-20 Exterior Wall insulation Value ▪ Smoke Detectors on Each Level of Your Home • Carbon Monoxide Detectors • 150 Amp Electrical Service Panel • One-on-one Meetings with Field Manager Including Build Quality Introduction, Build (Duality Orientation and Build Quality Celebration • Professionally Trained Sales Consu:Lant and Field Manager Committed to Exceeding your Expectations 3. Leak Protection for 5 Years 4. Structural Integrity for 10 Years Owner's Entry is an exclusive web based program th progress of your new home! Owner's Entry participants va receive • Personal Login & Password • Horne Care Guides • Preferres Partner Discounts See your Saes Consultant for more details. a lows you to track the construction • Automated Construction Progress Updates And so Much More! Homeowners Speak. We Listen. Consumer deas = Life Tested® Homes. Pulte.com Pulte Homes reserves tne right to make specification, Wan, and/or prroing changes without prior notice or obligation. Standard features and options are subject to change and vary per plan. Subject to errors, changes and omissions. Life Tested® is 8 trademark of PN 11. Inc. ©2017 Pulte Hornes of Minnesota LLC. All rights reserved. BL#B0627273, 10.6.17 REGENT -Fr'01 - QUARRY POINT PARK THE SHORES -rovvm-icilviEs OCATION 1111A, I ' 0 EMI 411111 MI Mil 61111116PLII, al um .....AllP itil m nip Await M MEN isle = me 1. , min imiromp, will, m . waiMIE al:1i: I 7," 'Nfann ,44AL 1,1,7 SW% -I _11STSTW LU _> 1.111 5 __~- 4' ": 0, if; k§:2..0 _ .-ice � � 73: . ` u_ --0, cei ' THE SHORES ~_'..W`.O``__.' COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION D" (Low Density Reskiential) and " (High Densit ` / rilk, -Nu anitt, 1;2 tt.r9 le., % r? 1-7ctivii' '41-11 SG 4. 1 IR tos A THESOR ToININIFIONIES ZONING MAP SG" (Sand and Gravel) x ,--. '''.E'`'. x x _ ` ^earEeva `�`. .. Oa 1••• 000 Apple Valley ITEM: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: SECTION: 6.B. June 20, 2018 Other Business Description: Review of Upcoming Schedule and Other Updates Staff Contact: Joan Murphy, Department Assistant ACTION REQUESTED: N/A SUMMARY: Next Planning Commission Meetings: Department / Division: Community Development Department Wednesday, July 18, 2018 - 7:00 p.m. • Public hearing applications due by 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday, June 20, 2018 • Site plan, variance applications due by 9:00 a.m. on Thursday, July 5, 2018 Wednesday, August 1, 2018 - 7:00 p.m. • Public hearing applications due by 9:00 a.m. on Thursday, July 5, 2018 • Site plan, variance applications due by 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday, July 18, 2018 Next City Council Meetings: Thursday, June 28, 2018 - 7:00 p.m. Thursday, July 12, 2018 - 7:00 p.m BACKGROUND: N/A BUDGET IMPACT: N/A