Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/19/2018••• •••• ••••• •••• •. • Apple II Valley Meeting Location: Municipal Center 7100 147th Street West Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124 December 19, 2018 PLANNING COMMISSION TENTATIVE AGENDA 7:00 PM 1. Call to Order 2. Approve Agenda 3. Approve Consent Agenda Items Consent Agenda Items are considered routine and will be enacted with a single motion, without discussion, unless a commissioner or citizen requests to have any item separately considered. It will then be moved to the land use/action items for consideration. A. Approve Minutes of December 5, 2018, Regular Meeting 4. Public Hearings A. TLM Realty Lot Subdivision - PC 18 -34 -SF Consider a Preliminary Plat to Create an Additional 22,690 sq. ft. Lot. Location: 7575 153rd Street West Petitioner: TLM Realty Holdings, LLC B. Time Square Shopping Center - Portillo's - PC18-35-SCGFB Consider a Preliminary Plat, Conditional Use Permit for a Drive Through and Site Plan/Building Permit Authorization to Allow for Construction of 8,300 sq. ft. Restaurant with Drive -Through Window Service Location: 7525 -7665 148th St. W & 7530 - 7564 149th St. W. Petitioner: Interstate Development Corp. 5. Land Use / Action Items 6. Other Business A. Review of Upcoming Schedule and Other Updates Next Planning Commission Meeting - Wednesday, January 9, 2019 - 7:00 p.m. Next City Council Meeting - Thursday, December 27, 2018 - 7:00 p.m. 7. Adjourn Regular meetings are broadcast, live, on Charter Communications Cable Channel 180 and on the City's website at www.cityofapplevalley.org l App Valil ley ITEM: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: SECTION: 3.A. December 19, 2018 Consent Agenda Description: Approve Minutes of December 5, 2018, Regular Meeting Staff Contact: Joan Murphy, Department Assistant Department / Division: Community Development Department ACTION REQUESTED: Approve minutes of regular meeting of December 5, 2018. SUMMARY: The minutes of the last regular Planning Commission meeting are attached for your review and approval. BACKGROUND: State statute requires the creation and preservation of meeting minutes which document the official actions and proceedings of public governing bodies. BUDGET IMPACT: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Minutes CITY OF APPLE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES DECEMBER 5, 2018 1. CALL TO ORDER The City of Apple Valley Planning Commission meeting was called to order by Chair Melander at 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Tom Melander, Ken Alwin, Tim Burke, Keith Diekmann, Jodi Kurtz and David Schindler. Members Absent: Paul Scanlan. Staff Present: City Attorney Sharon Hills, City Engineer Brandon Anderson, Community Development Director Bruce Nordquist, City Planner Tom Lovelace, Planner Kathy Bodmer and Department Assistant Joan Murphy. Chair Melander called for a moment of silence in memory of President George H. W. Bush, the 41' President of the United States, whose funeral was held earlier in the day. 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Chair Melander asked if there were any changes to the agenda. MOTION: Commissioner Burke moved, seconded by Commissioner Diekmann, approving the agenda. Ayes - 6 - Nays - 0. 3. CONSENT ITEMS MOTION: Commissioner Burke moved, seconded by Commissioner Diekmann, approving the minutes of the meeting of October 3, 2018. Ayes - 6 - Nays - 0. MOTION: Commissioner Burke moved, seconded by Commissioner Diekmann, approving the 2019 Planning Commission regular meeting schedule. Ayes - 6 - Nays - 0. 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Panera Bread — PC18-33-ZCB Chair Melander opened the public hearing at 7:02 p.m. City Planner Tom Lovelace said Panera Bread, LLC and Brixmor Southport Centre, LLC are requesting approval of a planned development ordinance amendment, conditional use permit and site plan/building permit authorization to allow for construction of a 4,820 -sq. ft. Class I restaurant with drive-through window service on an existing 1.28 -acre lot. The site is located at 15200 Cedar CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes December 5, 2018 Page 2 of 8 Avenue, in the Southport Centre retail development and is the current location of the Baker's Square restaurant. The site is located in zone 2 of Planned Development No. 244, which allows for Class I and II restaurants as permitted uses and drive-through window service in conjunction with a Class II restaurant as a conditional use. The applicant is requesting that the planned development ordinance be amended to allow for drive-through window service in conjunction with a Class I restaurant as a conditional use. Commissioner Alwin asked if the menu board and drive-through lane would allow only one drive through and one menu board. If a restaurant would want multiple lanes and menu boards would they be coming back for a variance. Mr. Lovelace said the current ordinance states one menu board per drive-through lane. The City has always been pretty particular about a pre -menu board because that has been more of an issue. The policy more recently in the last 5 - 7 years has been that we required there be a by-pass lane associated with these drive-through lanes. Discussions with the applicant revealed that about 25 percent of their business could be taking orders through the drive -up lane where other restaurants could be as much as 50 percent of their business. He said it is not necessary to have the by-pass lane with this proposal. Commissioner Diekmann asked for clarification that if the building to the north as a Class II restaurant has a drive-through lane as a permitted use and to the south is a pharmacy with a drive- through lane, why does the City restrict a Class I and not a Class II restaurant in this area. Mr. Lovelace explained it falls back to the definition related to a casual restaurant itself. The drive- through service and how it works at Walgreens is a condition use. He added he would like to clean up this planned development ordinance so we do not have problems now or in the future. Brent Massey, CEI Engineering representing the applicant Panera, said it is a replacement of a restaurant for a restaurant that would be adding a full-fledged drive-through compared to previous pie lane. They decreased the square footage of the restaurant slightly and decreased the impervious surface. He added that 25 percent of Panera's business would be going through the drive-through. Chair Melander commented that the north and west elevations of the building are pretty stark and normally the City would like to see things a little more dressed up especially right in the middle of downtown. He added the City has a four -side kind of policy on a lot of these buildings around the downtown area and suggested adding awnings, spandrel glass, stripes etc. without overburdening the cost of construction. He would like to see a sharper look on all four sides. Dick Hanson, 7108 Lower 170th Court W., Rosemount, Minnesota, inquired what the seating capacity was like and if there would be enough senior parking and disabled parking. He said Baker's Square is home to a huge number of seniors and he thinks this should be a huge consideration. He said he does not see enough handicapped parking on the site plan. He had concern for the routing through the site and not being able to see over the menu board, not being CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes December 5, 2018 Page 3 of 8 able to back up if cars are in line and how hazardous it could become by the dumpster area if snow removal is not completely done. He commented it could be a long way for a senior group to walk and that snow blows across the walkway. He asked how many handicapped parking spots there were besides the two he could identify on the site plan. City Attorney Sharon Hills answered that the number of handicapped parking spots is regulated by the building code. Commissioner Diekmann said he believes the entrance is on the southeast corner of the building and closest to all the parking. Chair Melander closed the public hearing at 7:26 p.m. B. The Shores — PC18-32-PZCSB Chair Melander opened the public hearing at 7:27 p.m. City Planner Tom Lovelace stated the applicant is requesting the following: 1. An amendment to the 2030 Comprehensive Plan Land Map re -designating approximately 2.5 acres from "LD" (Low Density Residential/ 2-6 units per acre) and 7.3 acres from "HD" (High Density Residential/12+ units per acre) to "MD" (Medium Density Residential/6-12 units per acre). 2. Rezoning of 9.8 acres of property from "SG" (Sand and Gravel) to "M-6" (Medium Density Residential/6-12 units per acre). 3. Subdivision of 78 acres into 101 residential townhome lots and twelve (12) outlots. 4. Conditional use permit to allow for townhome construction with exposed finish materials other than those provided under section 155.346 of the city code. 5. Site plan/building authorization to allow for construction of 101 townhome dwelling units on 9.8 acres. A conditional use permit (C.U.P.) has been approved for the "SG" zoned property within the proposed development, which allows sand and gravel mining. This proposal will end the ability of Fischer Sand and Aggregate, the current owner, to mine the property. Therefore, the owner will need to release the sand and gravel mining C.U.P. on the southwest 9.8 acres of the site. Staff will work with the developer and property owner with the amendment of the C.U.P. Mining operations will continue north of the proposed development, which could result in potential conflicts. This will need to be addressed through the zoning code regulations that establish setbacks between residential property and mining operations, operating hours, and screening. The proposed 9.8 -acre townhome development in the southwest corner of the overall site will require approval of the before -mentioned Comp Plan Land Use Map re -designation, rezoning, and conditional use permit. The remainder of the property will retain its current Comp Plan Map designation and zoning until development requests are brought before the City for consideration. Commissioner Burke asked if the second street in had no turnaround. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes December 5, 2018 Page 4 of 8 Mr. Lovelace answered that is correct and that the Fire Department reviewed the site and confirmed it was adequate for a fire truck to provide emergency service. Commissioner Kurtz asked for clarification if 1/3 of the buildings were stone. Mr. Lovelace replied that 1/3 of the buildings would have treatment in stone and would have upgraded elevations. Chair Melander referred back to the Regatta area and the complaints that came in with the active mining near there. He said this is bound to happen again with this development while marketing is going on and suggested it be clear for the buyers to know development is still going on for awhile in the neighborhood. He asked for a comparison related to the standards and durability rating for vinyl siding. Mr. Lovelace said he would have to ask the Building Inspection Department and then made comparisons to the Cobblestone Lake area in PD -703 where no vinyl siding is allowed because of the planned development restrictions. Paul Heuer, Pulte Homes, said this development is to be built around a sand and gravel mining area and feels this is an ideal location for townhomes. They made a few minor changes since the Sketch Plan Review six months earlier. The front of the townhomes, which are very attractive, face outward and no garages face outward. There is a variety of styles and different options to choose from. Townhomes can have a third car tandem garage. There will be a fire pit area and a gathering space. Commissioner Burke asked for a description of the variation of the units. Mr. Heuer, described the units and said they preset which options are in which units for variety including the color options so all units do not look alike. Commissioner Burke said it looks from the diagram that the driveway entry is in the southeast and asked how that was selected rather than the northwest off Johnny Cake Ridge Road. Mr. Heuer explained that for the first two years the southeast will be their only real access because this will be built in two phases. In the next phase, Johnny Cake Ridge Road goes on through. The southeast access will be near retail, parks and the park and ride locations. Chair Melander asked about guest parking. Mr. Heuer replied he never heard of problems with the guest parking in the neighborhoods they developed because they provide sufficient parking. He agreed that living in a townhome neighborhood and having a graduation party, parking can be more difficult than if you live in a single-family neighborhood with public streets where people can park half mile away down the street. He added people have to use their judgement. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes December 5, 2018 Page 5 of 8 Chair Melander inquired if the streets would be narrower than the standard width of City streets. Mr. Heuer answered yes. There will be private streets with no parking on the streets and the guest parking stalls are set up at key locations so people do not have to walk too far to any particular home. John Grosse, 6024 — 158th Court W., asked if these townhomes would be allowed to be rentals or if this is put in place by the ownership group. He feels 50 percent of homeowners could be a concern and he was looking for balance. He said townhomes in Cobblestone Lake are way too tall. He said the elevation of the land is slightly different from where he is at and it appears to slope slightly upwards and asked it that also would be built up like Regents Point and Quarry Ponds single-family homes. He asked if there would be a basement option where you do not have to go as tall and that could alleviate the 3 -story concerns. He said he would prefer a medium density housing option going forward opposed to high density apartments. He said low density would be awesome but probably not realistic. Chris Moldan, 6035 — 158th Court W., said he lives in the corner looking toward this development and was told that across from them would be single-family homes. Height of townhomes with high density is a concern to him. He said 157th Street sees more traffic and anything at that intersection would be a help. He asked how the school district would be impacted with changing of this density. Ryan Olson, 15781 Fair Hill Way, inquired from a marketing standpoint who they are aiming for their sales and what the price range would be. He was not interested in economy housing next to low density. Mr. Heuer responded to the questions asked and said that rentals would be allowed. A homeowners association (HOA) would be created upfront and all property owners would become part of that association. They would create a budget and hire a professional management company and let them manage things. After 75 percent of the homes are occupied by buyers, that is the time they would hand over management to the homeowners. They have a turnover meeting and let the homeowners decide if they want to continue with the rules that were set in place initially and if they want to continue with the management company that had been initially chosen. When they reach that meeting point after 75 percent of the properties have been occupied, they never hear of that rental issue. He had never heard of any issues anymore. He referred to the height of the townhomes at Cobblestone Lake and agreed that they can be seen and do stand out because they are at the top of a cliff. He said they will go with straight zoning with this application and meet the requirements of the roof lines and lower the building. That is how they will address the concern for the height. Related to the concern of grades, he said they will be following the same grades as those of 157th Street and Johnny Cake Ridge Road. There is not massive hill. This is a mine so they get to create the grades. They will not create steep grades in a townhome development to make it difficult. There is a reason to believe level grade throughout. Related to the values of the homes, he said the range would be $290,000 to $330,000. Related to the school district impact, he added school districts look at the City's and County's Comprehensive Plans and look at projections and plan CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes December 5, 2018 Page 6 of 8 accordingly. They look at what the surrounding areas are ultimately going to develop too and they plan accordingly. These same tools are used to plan for the traffic and roads in the area. Jill Arnett, 15716 Everglade Avenue, commented that during ball games people from Quarry Point Park park on their street and she asked if parking would be allowed on 157th Street W. She asked if people would be allowed to park in their neighborhood and walk across the street to get into this development. That would be her concern. Liza Robson, owner of the gravel mine, AVR and Rockport LLC, provided a history of the site and said this is approximately where her father's family farm started in the 1920s and they have been long term residents of the area. Her father and his brother started Fischer Construction Company and the previous gravel mine in the 1950s. Her father started Apple Valley Redi-Mix in 1967. Her father was very involved in the community. She said the Fischer family have been long term residents of the community and feel everything they have done and have tried to do with the utmost conscientiousness and team work with the City so they can be sure they build quality and pick the right partners to do this with. She said they feel Pulte is the right partnership for them and the City to do a quality development. Chair Melander closed the public hearing at 8:25 p.m. C. Hy -Vee Convenience Store Pennock — PC18-32-SCBVFG Chair Melander opened the public hearing at 8:27 p.m. Planner Kathy Bodmer stated the property owner, Java Capital Partners 7668 - 150th St LLC, and the petitioner, Hy -Vee Inc., request consideration of actions which would allow them to redevelop the Liberty Credit site to construct a 4,400 sq. ft. convenience store with motor fuel sales. The property is located on the southeast corner of County State Aid Highway 42 (CSAH 42) and Pennock Lane at 7668 - 150th Street W. The petitioners request consideration of a preliminary plat or replat, conditional use permit, variances, and site plan review/building permit authorization. The petitioners have applied for a vacation of approximately 2,600 sq. ft. of Pennock Lane right-of- way, which will be reviewed directly by the City Council. If the vacation is approved, the petitioners would like to combine the vacated parcel with the existing Lot 1, Block 1, Apple Valley Square 2nd Addition. Commissioner Kurtz asked if they would be scraping the site and if the speed bumps would remain. Ms. Bodmer answered that the speed bumps are actually within the parking lot and the redevelopment would just occur on the site where the Liberty building is. She said there would be no change to the speed bumps but it is an important thing that should be looked at. Chair Melander said it is a pretty tight site to meet the 21/2 percent landscaping requirement and asked if public art could be used. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes December 5, 2018 Page 7 of 8 Ms. Bodmer replied that landscape plan is intended to create an enhanced outdoor space and community space and that artwork would fall nicely under that. Commissioner Alwin recalled from a previous proposal on this site that there is a hefty elevation change between the Firestone parcel and this one and it looks like there is no cross access drive planned from this parcel to the Firestone. Ms. Bodmer said that is correct and the City would like to see the shared access between the two property owners and agreed that it was a problem with previous proposals. Phil Hoey, Director of Real Estate for Hy -Vee, said this site has a lot of challenges to accommodate this store. The store could fulfill an offering that is not supplied somewhere else in this area. He said the volume of traffic on Pennock Lane for convenience stores are designed to work. Commissioner Diekmann asked if all the basins on this property were infiltration basins. City Engineer Brandon Anderson answered they are actually storm water vaults and filtration basins which do not allow it into the soil. It filters water through a media and then through a storm sewer. Sheila Hisdahl, 815 Fireside Drive, spoke of the storm drain and asked where it was located. She remembered a big storm drain by HealthPartners and it drains into the pond at 153rd Street. She said the intersection of Pennock Lane and County Road 42 floods. She expressed concern for where the pipe drains are. She asked if it would it meet up with Jonathan. She expressed concern for the amount of traffic on Pennock Lane and if the plans were to make Pennock Lane wider. She also had concern for pumps and the long trucks turning into the site. Chair Melander closed the public hearing at 9:02 p.m. 5. LAND USE/ACTION ITEMS -NONE- 6. OTHER BUSINESS A. Review of upcoming schedule and other updates. Community Development Director Bruce Nordquist stated that the next regular Planning Commission meeting would take place Wednesday, December 19, 2018, at 7:00 p.m. 7. ADJOURNMENT Hearing no further comments from the Planning Staff or Planning Commission, Chair Melander asked for a motion to adjourn. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes December 5, 2018 Page 8 of 8 MOTION: Commissioner Schindler moved, seconded by Commissioner Diekmann to adjourn the meeting at 9:10 p.m. Ayes - 6 - Nays - 0. Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Joan Murphy Joan Murphy, Planning Department Assistant Approved by the Apple Valley Planning Commission on Tom Melander, Chair ... .... •••• ..• l App Valil ley ITEM: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: SECTION: 4.A. December 19, 2018 Public Hearings Description: TLM Realty Lot Subdivision - PC18-34-SF Staff Contact: Alex Sharpe, Planner and Economic Development Spec. Department / Division: Community Development Department Applicant: TLM Realty, LLC Project Number: PC18-34SF Applicant Date: 11/8/2018 60 Days: 1/7/2019 120 Days: 3/8/2019 ACTION REQUESTED: Open the public hearing, receive comments and close the public hearing. It is the policy of the Planning Commission not to act on a item the night of its public hearing. SUMMARY: TLM Realty Holdings, LLC, is requesting approval of a preliminary and final plat to create a 22,690 sq. ft. lot in front of the Burlington Coat Factory and Aldi at the Apple Valley Square site. At this time the applicant is not seeking approval of a site plan and building permit authorization as a user has not been identified. This will require the project to be reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council at a later date when the applicant has identified a user and the actual design and footprint of the proposed structure. This is not typical process for the City, however, is it permitted by code and has been reviewed by the City Attorney. The site of the proposed lot is in the northeast corner of Lot 2, Block 1, Apple Valley Square 4th addition. This is directly north of the Arby's and east of the Burlington Coat Factory. The proposed building is 2,500 sq. ft. and is proposed to remain zoned "RB" retail business. BACKGROUND: Requested Actions: The applicant, TLM Realty Holdings, LLC, has applied for the following actions: 1. Subdivision of Lot 2, Block 1, Apple Valley Square 4th Addition via preliminary plat to create an additional 22,690 sq. ft. lot. 2. Final Plat of Lot 1, Block 1, Apple Valley Square 6th Addition. Comprehensive Plan: The subject property is currently designated "C" (Commercial) on the 2030 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The commercial designation includes a wide variety of retail, office, and service uses that vary in intensity and off-site impacts. The City uses the zoning ordinance to regulate the intensity and characteristics of development based upon land use criteria and performance standards. Examples of limitations to development include required parking, building setbacks, infiltration, site access, and lot coverage. Retail uses typically encompass the traditional community shopping businesses and occupy much of the downtown area. This specific commercial land use is intended to accommodate a wide range of commercial goods and services. Off-site impacts include activity, light, noise and generally higher traffic generation rates than other commercial uses. Residential developments are not allowed within this land use category except for those planned in conjunction with a planned development (PD zoning), or within the upper floors of multi-level buildings as a conditional use to ensure that impacts are mitigated. Retail land uses will be zoned Retail Business, Retail Shopping Center, and Planned Development, which allows uses according to the specific performance standards: • High quality site and architectural design and building materials are expected to be used within this land use category to promote pleasing off-site views of the development; Development in the downtown area shall adhere to the Downtown Design Guidelines; • Landscaping shall be installed to provide aesthetic treatment of buildings and to soften parking lot areas; • Significant traffic generation during the weekday and weekends is associated with retail development. Traffic studies may be requested in conjunction with the review of large developments that have the potential to threaten the integrity of the existing and planned roadway system. Additionally, developments that lower the level of service on adjacent roadways or intersections may be required to install traffic improvements to improve the level of service to its pre -development condition if City approval is granted. • Driveway access points to the development shall be from non -local streets or those designed for primarily non-residential traffic. No direct access to County Road #42 and Cedar Avenue shall be allowed; and • Lighting is limited to parking lot and building illumination designed for employee safety. Zoning: The site is zoned "RB" Retail Business, which will determine the permitted and conditional uses for the proposed structure. The Retail Business zone is centrally located and serves to provide general retail sales in the community. As a user has not been identified, the proposed use will be evaluated if the subdivision is approved with an application for a site plan and building permit authorization. Site Plan/Plat: A site plan and building permit authorization is not being applied for as part of this application. However, preliminary evaluation by staff has been completed to provide direction for the future application if the subdivision is approved and to determine whether the new lot is viable. Due to the potential for additional development in the Apple Valley Square 6th Addition plat with other applications the City is currently reviewing, this plat shall be renamed to Apple Valley Square 7th addition. The total building coverage permitted by code in the "RB" retail business zone is 35%. The existing lot is 302,473 sq. ft. with a building footprint of 88,737 sq. ft. or 29% building coverage. The proposed lot is 22,609 sq. ft. with a 2,500 sq. ft. building or 11% building coverage. By reducing the existing lot size with the creation of the new lot the existing lot would become 279,864 and have a building coverage of 32%. The final plat shall dedicate 5' drainage and utility easements along the perimeter, which is consistent with other lot subdivisions within the city. P arking: The total parking required for the existing and proposed parcel is 388 stalls, which are being provided on site. The new lot shall obtain cross parking agreements with the existing lot for overflow parking. Staff has evaluated the parking requirement based on full use of the site, rather than the current uses in the event of an additional tenant, or redevelopment of the existing building in the future. Landscape Plan: The landscape plan identifies a variety of plantings in new landscape islands on the adjacent parcel. These landscape islands are required as a redevelopment of the existing parking lot to bring it into code compliance. The new parcel is required to install landscaping at 2.5% of the means cost of construction of the proposed building is associated with the site plan and building permit authorization. The current plans do not show any landscaping, and very limited green space where landscaping can be installed. Prior to the issuance of a site plan and building permit authorization the site will be required to meet code landscaping requirements. Several of the new off site plantings in the proposed landscape islands conflict with underground utilities.No major tree plantings shall be located over any underground utilities Or within easements. Existing tree plantings adjacent to Cedar Ave shall be protected throughout any construction. Availability of Municipal Utilities: The City Engineer has reviewed the utility plans and his comments are contained in his attached memo. Site utilities are being served by connecting to private lines through the adjacent lot, which is not the standard practice for the City. Full utility plans will be required with the site plan and building permit authorization. The connection to private vs public utility lines will require additional review at that time. Clarification and additional information requested by the City Engineer in the attached memo will be required prior to issuance of a site plan and building permit authorization. Street Classifications/Accesses/Circulation: The property is located adjacent to Cedar Avenue to the west, and private drives to the north and east. No access shall be allowed from Cedar Avenue. A cross access/parking easement between this property and the lot to the south will provide additional access to the site. A traffic study may be required in the future to determine the impacts of the proposed use on nearby public intersections, principally 153rd Street West. Pedestrian Access: The applicant shall provide a sidewalk connection from the site to the sidewalk along Cedar Avenue. There is also no pedestrian connection between the proposed and the existing buildings, and is strongly encouraged. A parking variance may be required to achieve this connection and can be evaluated with additional applications but has strong relation to pedestrian access. Signs: All signage shall conform to the regulations set forth in Chapter 154 of the city code. Public Hearing Comments: The public hearing should be opened, comments taken and the hearing closed. It is the policy of the Planning Commission not to act on the night of the public hearing. BUDGET IMPACT: Park dedication would be required as part of the creation of this lot. ATTACHMENTS: Area Map Area Map Zoning Map Memo Applicant Letter Plan Set Plan Set Final Plat Proposed New Lot .tt 4.44A A A 0 A 40.... , . „„, • A., t 412112 r. 0 Iv - wo - v wv- v v. t . vs. N ,* 4 153RD CT W ,. W W Q Q 11 CC as 0 0 WW O V WHITNEY DR Comprehansive Plan Designation Map rr t ISM r,�' a 'ENL'w�'-� Firi \-#741 kitsolm- Imatvratab, VFW", Lo.---....aommt PP( 7.17-421,1k4_ 1400 mlilic"ign OtAdrIeli &A- 111 f rapi,•�irM em Oi42k JILL! IL!rrML - V --��' z J U 0 z z w a RB 153RD ST W WHITNEY DR PD - LU w 'a 'a as U U —PD1244 c ii`F, CEJ; •• imFi-1 ��; y m, ,„I ��•r • sp", w'w-m-diiiiiPrIf -V% VIPS .nwkim swill.' f �ii ImamatINCIP -- Wim' w7 147 WlNq !4Rh 11 e, CITY OF Apple 'Valley MEMO Public Works TO: Alex Sharpe, Planner FROM: Brandon S. Anderson, PE, City Engineer DATE: December 13, 2018 SUBJECT: TLM — Burlington Pad Site. General 1. Provide a narrative and site plan showing how the site will be developed and any impacts prior to building permit authorization. The narrative and plan shall include the following: a. Material storage and staging i. All material storage to be onsite and indicated on plan. b. Haul routes to and from the site. c. Contractor and subcontractor parking locations i. Onsite trade parking should be provided. 2. Provide traffic impact study showing anticipated trips and distribution of traffic for the added retail as part of preliminary plat. Permits 3. A Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit is required for any project that disturbs more than one acre. 4. A City of Apple Valley Natural Resource Management Permit (NRMP) will be required prior to any land disturbing activity. 5. Provide a copy of the executed MPCA sanitary sewer extension permit prior to construction. 6. Provide a copy of the approval letter from the Department of Labor and Industry (DOLI) prior to construction. 7. Provide a copy of any other required permits. Site 8. Additional 5' side yard drainage and utility easements should be indicated on the Final Plat. 9. The legend on sheet C0-20 appears to be missing the definitions of several linetypes and symbols. 10. Provide the document number for the existing utility easement over the sanitary sewer south of the existing building. 11. This plan is intended to be for the development of the proposed retail at Lot 1 Block 1, however, numerous improvements are shown on private property of Lot 2 Block 1 of Apple Valley Square 4th Addition: islands are shown as being constructed throughout the parking lot, the entire parking layout is being revised, and plantings are shown throughout the property. Also, several of the proposed islands are shown within the existing easement and over the existing watermain. 12. Show the required bituminous pavement removal and replacement needed for construction of the proposed utilities through Lot 2 Block 1 of Apple Valley Square 4th Addition. 13. An additional curb island with plantings is required just to the west of the proposed building to better separate and direct traffic flow. 14. Additional pavement markings (direction arrows) should be shown on the drive aisles to/from pad site to direct traffic to main vehicle routes to/from site. 15. Provide additional dimensions on site plan indicating radii, drive lane widths, sidewalk and pedestrian access route widths, and parking stall dimensions. Also, indicate what dimension labels are measured to (e.g. face-of-curb, back-of-curb, edge of pavement, etc.) 16. Existing light poles are shown on sheet C0-20, but no existing or proposed lights are shown on sheet C3-10. Provide a lighting and photometric plan if any lighting modifications are to be made. 17. Provide setback lines on plan sheets. 18. Provide an additional drawing showing vehicle turning movements to ensure site circulation requirements for emergency vehicles. 19. Provide an additional drawing showing vehicle turning movements to ensure site circulation requirements for typical delivery vehicles. 20. Final site plan shall be reviewed with the construction plans and approved by City Engineer. Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control 21. Provide overall site composite Curve Number (CN) on the plans. 22. Provide Storm water management Plan. 23. Show elevations at all critical elevation points (i.e. high and low points). 24. Show all emergency over flow (EOF) elevations. The finished floor/low opening elevation must be 1' minimum above the EOF elevation. 25. The project appears to lack permanent storm water treatment. Refer to the following policies in the 2018 SWMP to determine treatment volume: a. Policy 6.2 The City requires that all new, redeveloped, or expanded commercial, industrial, multiple residential, or institutional development provide infiltration for a volume equivalent to 0.5 inches of runoff over the area of the development. b. Policy 6.3 The City requires that new and redevelopment activity of 0.2 acres or more shall be required to achieve no-net-increase in average annual total suspended solids (TSS) and total phosphorus (TP) loading compared to the pre- development condition of the site. c. Policy 6.5 New and redevelopment activity of 0.2 acres or more shall be required to achieve no-net increase in average annual runoff volume compared to the pre- development condition. 26. Due to the location of this project within a sub watershed that drains to 2 lakes (Keller Lake & East Lake) currently impaired due to excess phosphorus, additional storm water treatment volume is recommended under policy 6.4 of the SWMP. 27. The grading plan shows drainage from the proposed site sheet draining directly onto private property outside of any drainage easement. An agreement between the property owners will need to be provided prior to site grading. 28. No proposed contours or spot elevations for the parking lot modifications of Lot 2 Block 1 of Apple Valley Square 4th Addition are shown. There appears to be a possible drainage issue that will be caused by the construction of the island on the north side of the site: the island will block drainage through the existing swale. 29. Final grading, drainage, and erosion control plan shall be reviewed with the construction plans and approved by City Engineer. Sanitary Sewer 30. Indicate the existing sanitary sewer pipe size and material at the connection point. 31. Indicate the proposed sanitary sewer pipe material, invert elevation, and grade. 32. Indicate the proposed sanitary sewer structure rim and invert elevations. 33. Confirm that all pipe crossings have been evaluated and will provide the required minimum vertical separation as specified by the Minnesota Department of Health and Department of Labor and Industry. 34. The existing sanitary sewer that is shown as being connected to is privately owned. An agreement between the property owners will need to be provided prior to the sanitary sewer connection. 35. The proposed sanitary sewer is trespassing onto private property. An agreement between the property owners will need to be provided prior to the sanitary sewer construction. 36. Final sanitary sewer design shall be reviewed with the construction plans and approved by City Engineer. Watermain 37. Indicate the existing watermain pipe size and material at the connection point. 38. Indicate the proposed watermain pipe material. 39. Indicate the specified cover over the proposed watermain. 40. Indicate all proposed watermain fittings, structures, valves, etc. 41. The existing watermain that is shown as being connected to is privately owned. An agreement between the property owners will need to be provided prior to the watermain connection. 42. The proposed watermain is trespassing onto private property. An agreement between the property owners will need to be provided prior to the watermain construction. 43. Provide a drawing showing hydrant coverage for the site. Commercial zones require 450' radius for coverage. 44. Domestic water and fire service shall be split outside the existing building and the valves shall be located 1.5 times the height of the building away from the building or placed in location readily accessible per City of Apple Valley standard detail plate SER -6. 45. Final watermain design shall be reviewed with the construction plans and approved by City Engineer. Storm Sewer 46. The existing storm sewer is depicted differently on sheets C1-10 and C3-10. On sheet C1- 10, the existing storm sewer is shown entirely within the existing easement, but on sheet C3-10, the existing storm sewer towards the north end of the site is shown outside of the existing easement. 47. Indicate the existing storm sewer pipe size and material throughout the site. 48. The existing storm sewer that is shown as being connected to is privately owned. An agreement between the property owners will need to be provided prior to the storm sewer connection. 49. The proposed storm sewer is trespassing onto private property. An agreement between the property owners will need to be provided prior to the storm sewer construction. 50. Provide calculations for the proposed storm sewer sizing. 51. Final storm sewer design shall be reviewed with the construction plans and approved by City Engineer. Landscape and Natural Resources 52. Proposed plantings are shown over the proposed storm sewer pipe and within the existing easement. No major tree plantings shall be located over any underground utilities or within easements. If plantings are shown over underground utilities or within easements, the owner should have the expectation that plantings will be removed for access when needed. 53. The proposed planting plan indicates 21 trees outside the boundary of this parcel, with no plantings or details on landscaping available around the building. Provide details on landscaping to meet City Code requirements. 54. Existing elms along Cedar Avenue shall be protected throughout construction. t November 2, 2018 Alex Sharpe Planning and Economic Development Specialist City of Apple Valley 7100 — I47th Street W. Apple Valley, MN 55124 RE: Project Description and Application Narrative TLM Commercial Development — Apple Valley, Minnesota Alex, The following project description and application narrative is being submitted as part of the review process for splitting and replatting the property described below to accommodate proposed future retail/commercial development in Apple Valley. The subject property is located at 7575 153rd Street West (PID: 01-11783-01-020) on an existing 6.94 acre parcel, and is currently zoned RB — Retail Business. TLM Realty is proposing to split and replat the parcel to create an additional lot in the northeastern portion of the site to facilitate future commercial/retail development. It is expected that the existing parking lot within the newly created lot will need to be removed, along with minor changes to in-place stormwater facilities, utilities, and grading. In addition, the remaining parking areas within the parcel will need to be restriped/reconfigured, and parking lot islands will need to be constructed to meet current standards. Because the new lot will remain zoned RB — Retail Business, and per the Apple Valley Code of Ordinances, retail/commercial business is a permitted use within the RB — Retail Business, the existing zoning will remain unaffected. Due to the intended commercial/retail use and maintained traffic flow expected from the surrounding retail/commercial businesses, no traffic impacts to the transportation network, subject property, or neighboring properties are anticipated. In addition, no negative impacts to the health, safety, or welfare of neighboring properties or the general public, and no pollution or negative impacts to the environment are anticipated as a result of the requested split/replat or future development. We understand that any future development will require review and the applicable approvals and permits as deemed necessary by the City. Splitting/replatting the parcel to create the additional lot as proposed will provide an ideal location for future retail/commercial development within the community. In addition, the site work that is anticipated to be performed as part of the future commercial/retail development will improve the existing conditions by bringing the existing parking areas into compliance. Please contact me at 952.426.0699 with any questions or if there is any additional information we can provide in support of this project. Sincerely, Ryan Anderson, PE Civil Engineer Civil Engineering Group 7900 International Drive + Suite 550 + Minneapolis, MN 55425 952.426.0699 + www.is-grp.com ARCHITECTURE + ENGINEERING + ENVIRONMENTAL + PLANNING w J 1- 1- 0 0 M- W 0) Ir 1- U w Z W 0 0 J >- W J o� aW0 WQ" z J J �Qa 0 w 0Z 0 2 W J J Q W J a a Q PRELIMINARY PLAT Z w w J PROJECT INDEX MANAGING OFFICE: w z 0 1- az 2 0 ml- ww J N N J J ,..0 J J 00 wm 44 -www M J J 00 ,;.-n as a¢ CI r ¢¢ JJ ,7 J a a W 2W 2a O 0 ✓ a 2a Lj 0 N O ci (z "oN "Q21 .0,1)) 3l1N3r1 V Q 001O VE M„91,90.0C .-» 1 1 ne▪ n 1 1 111u1'1 11 1 1o'n mi � � I -4r -77, P7ifq 772- 21VQ3: 3 O z 0 s x® ( o v 'au 03) 3J1 NaAV ueaa,3 11 • •• D 0 0 O F I L 7 00.012 H1a0N ME V MEli ME Mb -AMR MOINE ' 00-02 HINON 000 N 0 L SR • U • 00 092 III Hlnos 4- �'.i' N a O 0 k w 0) N 0 EE 0 • 0 EROSION CONTROL LEGEND STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN NOTES: co ul a/.o.o At o. to LAI: AS 2,2 A5EAui 47 \ \ \ 2 \ } EROSION CONTROL LEGEND / \ _ \�. \ \ \ 2 \ } }} }}\\ [ [ ( \\ }\\ \ 0 �(\,((/\ SITE PLAN PAVEMENT LEGEND PARKING DATA: (VAT Qu DP))3rnT3nV EY.. PROPERTY LINE rl STORM DRAIN PIPE SCHEDULE STORM DRAIN SCHEDULE LP 0 ams ZN °O GRADING PLAN O 0 ZN PLANTING PLAN O Y / v PLANT SCHEDULE COMMON NAMES BOTANICAL NAME Autumn We Maple Acer rubrum'Autumn Spire' Ai Sprlrg Snow Crabapple Maks n'Sprip9 Snai Street Keeper Honeylocusl Gleditsla racanthos'0rores' EL, 0000 (£G O Q21 "0-0 CITY LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS • GENERAL PLANTING NOTES n 1.5 0 W 0 SITE PLAN PAVEMENT LEGEND PARKING DATA: (£17 'OAT 'QX •03) 3l2 3A 6' 2[VQU:J EY.. PROPERTY LINE STORM DRAIN PIPE SCHEDULE .10 STORM DRAIN SCHEDULE LP 211PrpLcle:MpNrSop7P;HESE PRESENTS That Apple Valley Minnesota Realty 1.1C a Minnesota lirated liability company owner of the TheNorth 1 44 52 feet of the East 157 00 feet of Lot 2 Block 1 APP. VALLEY. SQUARE 4TH ADDITION according to the recorded pl. thereof Dakota County Minnesota 'ut'heuradinha:esaaZ2libbyeefeergnIt:nads ffateeddZAtiPsITLIVAU_EY. SQUARE STH ADDITION and does hereby dedicate to the public for public In wtness whereof said Apple Valley Minnesota Rea, LLC,a Minnesota limrted liabllM company, has caused these presets to be sign., es Proper °Ricer this day of 20_ 0 20 by Mark A Schwanz H a r 2 r rg Thg‘, LIM ZS,Igg 3,91, 90.09S ZS Igg M91, 90.00N T Joel T. Beoprann, County L _ 0 (1) JEFFREY S JOHNSON RUSSELL H CROWDER JON P ERICKSON MICHAEL F HURLEY DOUGLAS G SAUTER HERMAN L TALLE CHARLES M SEYKORA DANIEL 1J GANTER, JR BEVERLY K DODGE JAMES D HOEFT • JOAN M QUADE ' JOHN T BUCHMAN SCOTT M LEPAK STEVEN G THORSON ELIZABETH A SCHADING Also licensed in Wisconsin December 19, 2018 BGS Barna, Guzy & Steffen, Ltd. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 200 Coon Rapids Boulevard NW, Suite 400 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55433-5894 www.bgs.com (763) 780-8500 FAX (763) 780-1777 1-800-422-3486 Writer's Direct Line: (763)783-5162 E -Mail Address: tschemmel c@ribgs. com SENT VIA U.S. MAIL and EMAIL Alex Sharpe City of Apple Valley Community Development Department 7100 147th St W Apple Valley, MN 55124 asharpe@cityofapplevalley.org Re: Planning Commission Public Hearing, December 19, 2018 (7:00 P.M.) Petition of TLM Realty Moldings, LLC -- PC 18 -34 -SF Our Client: Regency Centers Corporation Our File: 66981-001 Dear Mr. Sharpe: WILLIAM F HUEFNFR BRADLEY A KLETSCHER TIMOTHY D ERB KAREN K KURTH ADRIEL B VILLARREAL TAMMY J SCHEMMEI. JENNIFER C MOREAU DAVID R SCHAPS THOMAS R WENTZELL CAROLEC ISAKSON LINDSAY K FISCHBACH NICOLE R WIEBOLD TYLER W EUBANK ANDREW THOMPSON THOMAS M CA PURI A OF COUNSEL W JAMES VOGL, JR JAMES H WILLS I am writing in regards to TLM Realty Holdings, LLC ("TLM") petition for approval of a preliminary and final plat to subdivide Lot 2, Block 1, Apple Valley Square 4th Addition, commonly known as the Burlington Coat Factory in Apple Valley Square ("Burlington Coat"), and create an additional 22,690 square foot lot, which would be platted as Lot 1, Block 1, Apple Valley Square 6th Addition. I represent Regency Centers Corporation ("Regency"). Regency owns, among other property, two parcels bordering Burlington Coat, namely the property legally described as Lot 1 and Lot 2, Block 1, Apple Valley Square 5th Addition, Apple Valley, Dakota County, Minnesota, and commonly known as Apple Valley Square. Apple Valley Square and Burlington Coat are subject to a Declaration effective as of October 1, 1982, recorded November 12, 1982 ("Declaration"). As part of that Declaration, Apple Valley Square and Burlington Coat each have certain rights and obligations, which will likely be impacted by TLM's petition to subdivide and later develop a retail store. Due to the length and complexity of the documents involved and, due to the confusing nature of the notice sent to our client and how recently the full details of TLM's proposal came to our attention, we respectfully request that the Planning Commission hold open the public hearing until its meeting on January 16, 2019, or as soon thereafter as it may be heard to allow Regency the opportunity to make public comment. An EOE/AA EmpEoyer Sincerely, BARNA, GUZY & STEFFEN, LTD. p ` Tammy J. Schemmel cc: Client 1846018 1 l App Valley ITEM: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: SECTION: 4.B. December 19, 2018 Public Hearings Description: Time Square Shopping Center- Portillo's - PC18-35-SCGFB Staff Contact: Alex Sharpe, Planner and Economic Development Spec. Department / Division: Community Development Department Applicant: Interstate Development Corp. Project Number: PC18-35-SCGFB Applicant Date: 11/15/2018 60 Days: 1/14/2019 120 Days: 3/15/2019 ACTION REQUESTED: Open the public hearing, receive comments and close the public hearing. It is the policy of the Planning Commission not to act on a public hearing item the night of the public hearing. SUMMARY: Interstate Development Corporation, on behalf of Time Square Shopping Center II, LLC, the property owner has submitted an application for a Final Plat, Site Plan and Building Permit Authorization, and a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to construct a 8,300 sq. ft. restaurant. with a drive-through in the "RB" (Retail Business) zoning district. The property is located at the northwest corner of Cedar Ave and CSAH 42, and is known as Time Square. The proposed restaurant is Portillo's, a restaurant that serves Italian beef, burgers, and other American fair. The proposal includes the demolition of a portion of the southern Time Square building, retaining the western half, and the construction of a new restaurant to the east on its own lot. BACKGROUND: Requested Actions: The applicant, Interstate Development Corporation has applied for the following actions: 1. Replat of the entire Time Square site, both the north and south parcels. 2. Site Plan and Building Permit authorization for a 8,300 sq. ft. Class III restaurant on Lot 3, Block 1, Levine Subdivision No. 3. 3. Site Plan and Building Permit authorization for the retained 9,700 sq. ft. retail structure on Lot 2, Block 1, Levine Subdivision No. 3 4. A setback variance for the existing southern building. 5. A Conditional Use Permit for a drive-through lane in connection with a Class III restaurant. 6. Vacation of a driveway access easement held by the City of Apple Valley that was intended to provide access to the City liquor store when it was located where Westwood Sports is currently. Replat of Existing Parcels: The petitioner is proposing to replat the existing parcels, shifting the lot lines to accommodate the new development, provide parking for each lot, and public street access to each lot. The existing property lines transect buildings, and create a land -locked parcel. The proposal will correct this, and will be required to provide each site with cross access and parking easements/agreements. A final plat diagram was not provided with the application materials and will be required before proceeding to City Council. Vacation of Driveway Access Easement: The Planning Commission does not review vacations of publicly held land, but some details are being provided to allow the Commission to better understand the project. The City holds a driveway access easement with Time Square from 1972. This easement, granted to the City allows the public to traverse the site from Glenda Ave, to Granada Ave. This area is south of the current driveway access to the site and is essentially ineffective due to multiple conflicts with landscape islands, curbing, and structures. The public hearing on this vacation is being held at the City Council on December 27th. Comprehensive Plan: The subject property is currently designated "C" (Commercial) on the 2030 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The commercial designation includes a wide variety of retail, office, and service uses that vary in intensity and off-site impacts. The City uses the zoning ordinance to regulate the intensity and characteristics of development based upon land use criteria and performance standards. Examples of limitations to development include required parking, building setbacks, infiltration, site access and lot coverage. Retail uses typically encompass the traditional community shopping businesses and occupy much of the downtown area. This specific commercial land use is intended to accommodate a wide range of commercial goods and services. Off-site impacts include activity, light, noise and generally higher traffic generation rates than other commercial uses. Residential developments are not allowed within this land use category except for those planned in conjunction with a planned development (PD zoning), or within the upper floors of multi-level buildings as a conditional use to ensure that impacts are mitigated. Retail land uses will be zoned Retail Business, Regional Shopping Center, and Planned Development, which allows uses according to the specific performance standards: • High quality site and architectural design and building materials are expected to be used within this land use category to promote pleasing off-site views of the development; Development in the downtown area shall adhere to the Downtown Design Guidelines; • Landscaping shall be installed to provide aesthetic treatment of buildings and to soften parking lot areas; • Significant traffic generation during the weekday and weekends is associated with retail development. Traffic studies may be requested in conjunction with the review of large developments that have the potential to threaten the integrity of the existing and planned roadway system. Additionally, developments that lower the level of service on adjacent roadways or intersections may be required to install traffic improvements to improve the level of service to its pre -development condition if City approval is granted. • Driveway access points to the development shall be from non -local streets or those designed for primarily non-residential traffic. No direct access to County Road #42 and Cedar Avenue shall be allowed; and • Lighting is limited to parking lot and building illumination designed for employee safety. Zoning: The site is zoned "RB" retail business, which conditionally allows a drive-through in connections with a Class III restaurant. The applicant is not proposing to rezone the property as the proposed use is permitted. Final Plat: A final plat diagram shall be submitted to the City for review prior to final evaluation by the City Council. Additional drainage and utility easements will be required as part of the final plat, including but not limited to perimeter easements. Site Plan: The site plan proposed to retain the three existing lots, shifting the lot lines to reflect the new development. Lot 1 includes the northern portion of Time Square, and parking north of the center drive aisle. The facade of the north building is proposed to be updated, but is not being reviewed as part of this application. Large facade improvements such as those done by Target and the former Rainbow site have not required a site plan/building permit authorization from City Council and have been reviewed as part of the building permit. Lot 2 consists of around half of the existing Time Square southern building, including the Tide, and Salon Concepts. Approximately 9,700 sq. ft. of the existing southern Time Square building will remain to the west, while nearly 14,500 sq. ft of the eastern portion of the structure will be demolished. This area formerly housed TCF Bank and other tenants, but has been vacant. Lot 3 includes the former TCF Bank, and some of the vacant space in the southern building. As stated, this area is proposed to be demolished. A new 8,300 sq. ft. Class III restaurant will be constructed for Portillo's on the eastern portion of lot 3 adjacent to Glenda Drive. A condition of the site plan and building permit authorization will be that the final plat be filed prior to issuance of a building permit. Site Access: The site is proposing to retain access from Glenda Drive, and Granada Ave. The new lot configuration will allow all of the lots to have public road access, but a cross access agreement or easement will be required that allows access for all parcels in the event of a land sale in the future. A sidewalk is shown connecting the new Portillo's site to the rest of the center, but not out to Cedar Ave. This sidewalk will be required to be extend out to the trail adjacent to Cedar to provide pedestrian access to the site. The City Engineer is recommending additional study of the location of the parking islands, and site access for the Portillo's site due to stacking concerns and the potential for stacking onto Glenda Ave. Additional study is required to determine the best configuration for entering the Portillo's site. Conditional Use Permit: A conditional use permit (CUP) is required to allow a drive-through when in conjunction with a Class III Neighborhood Restaurant. The drive-through proposed allows for stacking of approximately 30 vehicles and is dual lane. Recently approved sites have required an escape lane in the drive-through, however, Portillo's is proposing a dual drive-through that will function as the escape lane. City Code requires that the following provisions be met for the City to approve the CUP. (1) The City Council shall find that any noise, headlights, traffic volume and emissions from idling vehicles resulting from the operation of the window does not negatively impact surrounding residential and institutional uses. (2) The drive-through lane shall not impede or conflict with vehicular, bicycle or pedestrian traffic circulation on the site, as determined by the City Traffic Engineer. (3). When a neighborhood restaurant is located less than 1,000 feet from residential or institutional use, the City Council may restrict the hours of operation of a drive-through window to mitigate any adverse impacts caused by noise, headlights, traffic volume and emissions from idling vehicles. The site is in the center of the Apple Valley downtown, and is well suited for the drive- through use. It will not impact residential uses as they are more than 1,000 feet from the site. The City Engineer has evaluated the drive-through and provided conditions and recommendations which will mitigate potential impacts to vehicular, bicycle, or pedestrian traffic circulation. Utilities: The City Engineer's memo is attached to this report which provides greater detail on utility requirements. A public project is anticipated with the extension of water service from Glenda Ave. Final alignment of the sewer line is to be evaluated further as the City Engineer has identified additional routes. As the sewer line will serve multiple properties it is anticipated that this line will become publicly owned and maintained. Easements over any public line are required. Stormwater: Stormwater for the site is proposed to be managed through underground vaults on each lot. The City currently holds a maintenance agreement with Time Square for the rain garden and the green space west of the southern building. Each lot will be required to provide a maintenance agreement that amends the current agreement. The City Engineer's memo attached to this report provides additional details and conditions on the site stormwater treatment. Variances: Due to existing lot line configurations a side setback variance is required. On the existing southern Time Square building a lot line currently transects the structure. Part of the building is being demolished, which improves the setback to the lot line, but the structure remaining will not meet the 15' setback required. As this is an improvement to the overall site conditions, staff is supportive of a setback variance. Parking: The total site requires 516 parking spaces, but the existing site only includes 344. This is likely due to the era in which this center was originally built having less parking demand. The proposed site plan allows for the increase to 402 spaces by placing storm water facilities in underground vaults, rather than adjacent to the Tide Cleaning service. As this is an improvement to an existing condition the City Attorney did not recommend a variance. The condition that there is a declaration of cross parking agreements and easements between all of the parcels will be a condition of approval. Landscaping: The applicant is required to provide 2.5% of the total building cost of construction as landscaping on Lot 3, as it is proposed to be new construction. The applicant shall be required to submit a bid list of all plants to ensure they have the ability to meet this requirement. At this time, additional landscaping may be required. Additional details on the species and configuration of the rain garden shall be provided, including native plantings. City staff has commented that the choice to utilize plantings rather than seeding the rain garden is a best management practice to be commended. Staff is recommending greater diversity of tree species on site as 15 of the 28 trees proposed are of a single species. Tree replacement on the site is likely required as many of the existing trees are Ash and likely infected with Emerald Ash Borer. Building Elevations: The Portillo's building will have a variety of materials, and visual breaks. Primary materials include Brick, precast concrete with alternating color palates, stainless steel, and aluminum. The elevations also include several decorative aluminum panel features. The facade will be consistent with code and surrounding commercial uses. As stated previously, the facade of the Time Square center's north building will also be improved but is not being reviewed with this project. Similarly to the facade improvements that have occurred at Target, Regency Center, and others the City is reviewing these improvements as part of the building permit. However, to clarify what the center's appearance will look like when constructed, staff is seeking elevations for the entire north structure, including the rear or north elevation. Primary materials being proposed are Nichiha Illumination Panels, Nichiha Vintage Wood Panels, and Waypost stone. The Nichiha product is a fiber cement board similar to other products such as hardy plank, but comes in a full commercial line. As the footprint of the southern building is being changed due to the demolition, the City is reviewing the building elevations for the retained portion of the southern structure. Partial elevations were submitted as well as a recent real world example. These are helpful for the City to visualize the project, and provide a context. Prior to the issuance of a recommendation for site plan and building permit authorization the remaining elevations of the structure, and the final color palate will require review by the Planning Commission. The existing elevations do not include any of the waypost stone that is prevalent on the northern building. Staff would recommend that stone elements be incorporated to better relate the two structures together. Signs: No sign approvals are given as part of the site plan and building permit authorization. The site plan shows 2 menu boards, and a pre -menu board. City code was changed in 2014 to allow up to two menu boards, one per drive-through lane. At that time the Planning Commission and City Council did not endorse a pre -menu board. A separate sign permit must be obtained prior to the installation of any sites on the site. BUDGET IMPACT: The property was originally developed in the 1960/70's and paid park dedication at that time. ATTACHMENTS: Area Map Zoning Map Area Map Area Map Memo Plan Set Plan Set Elevations Elevations s BIZ Rg a 4 0 1 0Ks]:I • RB 149TH ST W Ni )i3ONN : -1 z w J FRONTAGE RD :d 4 BM f_V/ w ,rli_f'A14:7_1 150TH ST W moaarku 150TH ST W / / / CPI / / 7 / /'.. / 7 Y / I / / / / / Al= Ed, KA X XI X-- I= / X la ., /1 -X / / / / / /46•111SEIMI / IMININED / / A • / Time Square Shopping Center Driveway Easement Approximate Location Driveway Easement Location Comprehansive Plan Designation Map CITY OF Apple 'Valley MEMO Public Works TO: Alex Sharpe, Planner FROM: Brandon S. Anderson, PE, City Engineer DATE: December 13, 2018 SUBJECT: Times Square — Portillo's General 1. Provide a narrative and site plan showing how the expansion will be constructed and any impacts prior to building permit authorization. The narrative and plan shall include the following: a. Material storage and staging i. All material storage to be onsite and indicated on plan. b. Haul routes to and from the site. c. Contractor and subcontractor parking locations i. Onsite trade parking should be provided. 2. A Public Improvement project is anticipated with this project for the extension of public utilities (sanitary sewer and water main) within Glenda Avenue. 3. Infiltration Maintenance agreements will be required for storm water improvements as part of each lot and block. 4. See attached Memo from SRF regarding the review of Traffic Impact Study as submitted by Kimley-Horn dated November 6, 2018. Permits 5. A Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit is required for any project that disturbs more than one acre. Provide a copy of the executed permit prior to construction. 6. A City of Apple Valley Natural Resource Management Permit (NRMP) will be required prior to any land disturbing activity. 7. A right-of-way permit from the City of Apple Valley is required for work within the Granada Avenue and Glenda Drive right-of-way. 8. Provide a copy of the approval letter from the Department of Labor and Industry (DOLI) prior to construction. 9. Provide a copy of any other required permits. Lot 1 Site 10. Additional pavement removal should be shown for the island modification south of building and storm sewer construction north of building. 11. Provide the shared parking agreement between Lots 1, 2, and 3. 12. The drive aisles within the parking lots north and south of the shared center access drive are slightly skewed from each other, if possible it is recommended to align these drive aisles directly across from one another. 13. The main access to the drive-thru should be aligned better with drive aisles and improve internal circulation. 14. Final site plan shall be reviewed with the construction plans and approved by City Engineer. Lot 2 Site 15. Additional pavement removal should be shown for the storm sewer extension from Granada Avenue. 16. Show additional dimensions on the site plan indicating sidewalk and pedestrian access route widths and drive lane width (far west side adjacent to Mc Donald's). 17. Provide the shared parking agreement between Lots 1, 2, and 3. 18. Provide an additional drawing showing vehicle turning movements to ensure site circulation requirements for emergency vehicles, especially behind existing building to remain. 19. Provide an additional drawing showing vehicle turning movements to ensure site circulation requirements for typical delivery vehicles, especially behind existing building to remain. 20. Final site plan shall be reviewed with the construction plans and approved by City Engineer. Lot 3 Site 21. Show additional dimensions on the site plan indicating sidewalk and pedestrian access route widths. 22. Provide the shared parking agreement between Lots 1, 2, and 3. 23. Provide an additional drawing showing vehicle turning movements to ensure site circulation requirements for emergency vehicles. 24. Provide an additional drawing showing vehicle turning movements to ensure site circulation requirements for typical delivery vehicles. 25. Sidewalk connection (and ADA ramps) to Cedar Avenue/Glenda Avenue should be provided along the south side of the RIRO entrance off Cedar Avenue. 26. Additional signage should be provided to direct drive-thru traffic to drive-thru lane directly. 27. Provide existing, 2019 build and 2030 build conditions for critical Mid-day and PM average, 95th percentile and max queue lengths for both eastbound and westbound traffic at center Private Street (149th) and Glenda. For the westbound (left turn), it should be measured from primary access into Portillo's. 28. Final site plan shall be reviewed with the construction plans and approved by City Engineer. Lot 1 Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control 29. Provide overall site composite Curve Number (CN) on the plans. 30. Provide the existing and proposed pervious and impervious areas and percentages on the plans. 31. Final grading, drainage, and erosion control plan shall be reviewed with the construction plans and approved by City Engineer. Lot 2 Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control 32. Provide overall site composite Curve Number (CN) on the plans. 33. Provide the existing and proposed pervious and impervious areas and percentages on the plans. 34. Drainage should be contained within the lot and drainage easement. Drainage should not cross the lot line outside of a drainage easement. This is not the case around the low point of structure STR-29 and on the east side of the building of Lot 2. Modify grading such that drainage does not trespass from one lot onto another. The parking lot grading should also be modified to reflect a "ridge" to prevent drainage from crossing the lot line. 35. Show all emergency over flow (EOF) elevations. The finished floor/low opening elevation must be 1' minimum above the EOF elevation and 3' minimum above 100 -year high water level. 36. Provide soil borings and geotechnical report for the proposed infiltration basins. 37. Final grading, drainage, and erosion control plan shall be reviewed with the construction plans and approved by City Engineer. Lot 3 Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control 38. Provide overall site composite Curve Number (CN) on the plans. 39. Provide the existing and proposed pervious and impervious areas and percentages on the plans. 40. Show all emergency over flow (EOF) elevations. The finished floor/low opening elevation must be 1' minimum above the EOF elevation and 3' minimum above 100 -year high water level. 41. The required volume chosen by the consultant reflects our 0.5" standard. However, policy 5.4 from the 2007 SWMP stated the following: a. New and re -development activity creating over 0.2 acres of new impervious surface shall be required to achieve no -net -increase in average annual runoff volume compared to the 1990 non -degradation baseline loading condition. Within the Vermillion River Watershed JPO boundaries, new development and re- development activities creating over one acre of new impervious area will be required to keep runoff volume for the 2 -year 24-hour storm at or under the runoff volume for the pre -development condition, or meet the above criteria, whichever is more restrictive. b. And policy 6.5 of the 2018 SWMP states the following: i. New and redevelopment activity of 0.2 acres or more shall be required to achieve no -net increase in average annual runoff volume compared to the pre -development condition; linear projects that do not increase the amount of impervious surface are exempt from this policy. c. The water quality volume selected by the applicant may be incorrect. Show no - net -increase in volume in addition to meeting the 0.5" requirement. Please note, City Code 152.55 (A) states the following: Conformance with operational plans. All construction, land -disturbing activity, and new development shall comply with any applicable operational plan. The SWMP is an operational plan per 152.02. 42. Plans shall indicate that the infiltration BMPs will be protected from compaction and sedimentation during construction, and that where feasible, will be constructed last. 43. No Utilities are allowed within Infiltration Basin areas. 44. It is unclear what the nature of the inlet(s) to the SE raingarden is/are. There also appears to be a pipe leading from the building to the raingarden that does not connect to the building or a catch basin. Basin appears to lack required pretreatment to protect the basin from sedimentation and erosive flows. Please note, the City recommends against the use of riprap as pretreatment as it is very difficult to clean; riprap must be removed completely and replaced. Consider a rain turret or equivalent structure for pretreatment. 45. Information is lacking on the underground infiltration chambers. Unable to comment on adequacy of pretreatment and other details. 46. Provide erosion and sediment control details. 47. Provide soil borings and geotechnical report for the proposed infiltration basins. 48. Final grading, drainage, and erosion control plan shall be reviewed with the construction plans and approved by City Engineer. Lot 1 Sanitary Sewer 49. Existing private sanitary sewer line between existing north buildings (14800, 7600, 7570 and 7525) should be clearly indicated on C502. Lot 2 & 3 Sanitary Sewer 50. The existing sanitary sewer that is shown as being connected to is privately owned. This existing sanitary sewer is a "high maintenance" line as indicated by Public Works due to existing services from restaurants. An agreement between the property owners will need to be provided prior to the sanitary sewer connection. Should sanitary sewer be dedicated to the City of Apple Valley due to multiple lots being connected to a single lateral, the sanitary sewer should be televised with reports being provided to City of Apple Valley for review. The sanitary would either need to be lined with CIPP or new PVC provided. Sanitary sewer would need to be dedicated in a drainage and utility easement for access by City of Apple Valley to maintain. 51. If connection to existing sanitary and dedication of easement is not feasible then a new sanitary sewer line would need to be run from proposed manhole between proposed lots 2 & 3 and extended into Glenda Avenue to connect to existing public sanitary sewer south of Raising Cane's. 52. The proposed sanitary sewer is trespassing onto private property. An agreement between the property owners will need to be provided prior to the sanitary sewer construction. 53. Final sanitary sewer design shall be reviewed with the construction plans and approved by City Engineer. Lot 1 Water main 54. Final Glenda Avenue watermain design and construction plans shall be done by the City of Apple Valley. 55. Existing 8" Water main behind building 7525 should be indicated on C502. 56. Applicant should indicate if existing 8" CIP north of existing buildings in lot 1 should be dedicated to City of Apple Valley and be included in a drainage and utility easement. Extension of Glenda Avenue water creates a loop to Granada Avenue. Lot 2 Watermain 57. Final Glenda Avenue watermain design and construction plans shall be done by the City of Apple Valley. 58. The proposed watermain is trespassing onto private property. An agreement between the property owners will need to be provided prior to the watermain construction. 59. Provide a drawing showing hydrant coverage for the site. Commercial zones require 450' radius for coverage. 60. Domestic water and fire service shall be split outside the existing building and the valves shall be located 1.5 times the height of the building away from the building or placed in location readily accessible per City of Apple Valley standard detail plate SER -6. 61. Confirm that all pipe crossings have been evaluated and will provide the required minimum vertical separation as specified by the Minnesota Department of Health and Department of Labor and Industry. 62. Final watermain design shall be reviewed with the construction plans and approved by City Engineer. Lot 3 Watermain 63. Final Glenda Avenue watermain design and construction plans shall be done by the City of Apple Valley. 64. Provide a drawing showing hydrant coverage for the site. Commercial zones require 450' radius for coverage. 65. Domestic water and fire service shall be split outside the existing building and the valves shall be located 1.5 times the height of the building away from the building or placed in location readily accessible per City of Apple Valley standard detail plate SER -6. 66. Confirm that all pipe crossings have been evaluated and will provide the required minimum vertical separation as specified by the Minnesota Department of Health and Department of Labor and Industry. 67. Final watermain design shall be reviewed with the construction plans and approved by City Engineer. Lot 1 Storm Sewer 68. Catch basin being constructed over existing to be constructed per City of Apple Valley standard detail plate STO-5. 69. Additional horizontal separation from the existing sanitary sewer is required to prevent maintenance issues in the future. 70. Drainage adjacent to Granada from private alley is not shown to be addressed by proposed storm water design. Additional structure constructed over existing 24" RCP is recommended in lieu of "angled" connection as shown. 71. Specify roof drain connection invert elevation on grading plan notes. 72. Provide storm water calculations for review and approval by the City Engineer. 73. Final storm sewer design shall be reviewed with the construction plans and approved by City Engineer. Lot 2 Storm Sewer 74. Show the orientation and layout of the underground chambers on the plan. 75. The rim elevation of structure STR-35 appears to be incorrect on sheet C501 based on the proposed grading contours. 76. Specify roof drain connection invert elevation on grading plan notes. 77. The proposed storm sewer is trespassing onto private property. An agreement between the property owners will need to be provided prior to the storm sewer construction. 78. Provide storm water calculations and storm water management plan for review and approval by the City Engineer. 79. Final storm sewer design shall be reviewed with the construction plans and approved by City Engineer. Lot 3 Storm Sewer 80. Show the orientation and layout of the underground chambers on the plan. 81. Specify roof drain connection invert elevation on grading plan notes. 82. Provide more detail on bio -infiltration basin. Basin appears to be collecting water from curb curbs in drive-thru only. 6" riser outlet specified on note on sheet C501, but not depicted on plans. 83. Proposed sign adjacent to Glenda is over proposed storm sewer. Relocation of storm or signage is necessary. 84. Bottom of infiltration basin is lower than proposed 100 -year elevation of underground stormtech. Provide hydraulic calculations to ensure infiltration basin will not back up during larger events. 85. Provide storm water calculations and storm water management plan for review and approval by the City Engineer. 86. Final storm sewer design shall be reviewed with the construction plans and approved by City Engineer. Landscape and Natural Resources 87. No major tree plantings shall be located over any underground utilities or within easements. If plantings are shown over underground utilities or within easements, the owner should have the expectation that plantings will be removed for access when needed. 88. We commend the choice to utilize plants opposed to a seeding in the raingarden. This should allow for quicker establishment and for the BMP to go on line quicker. 89. Recommend against the use of a spaded edge for the raingarden; a contractor grade plastic, metal, or paver edge is preferred. This will aid in preventing grass creep into the garden. 90. The raingarden lacks planting and materials details. Area of the garden, plant species, mulch, and engineered soil media shall be specified. Installation methods and plant establishment methods shall be specified. Recommend following the standards of the Minnesota Storm water Manual and Dakota County LID Standards http : //www. dakotaswc d. org/pdfs/Dakota%2O LID %20 Standards %20Revi s ed%2002-09- 12.pdf. 91. Incorporation of additional native plants into the planting plan in place of cultivars and native cultivars will have additional water quality and pollinator habitat benefits. 92. Recommend against the use of Miscanthus in plantings. Some species of Miscanthus are listed as invasive or noxious in certain regions of the United States. Recommend substituting with a native alternative (e.g. Big Bluestem, Indian Grass, and Switchgrass). 93. Tree planting is prohibited in public drainage and utility easements. Drainage and utility easements should be clearly identified on landscape plan. 94. The Landscape Plan proposes 28 new trees, 15 are lindens. It is recommended to diversify the plantings to follow the 30-20-10 rule. (The rule suggests an urban tree population should include no more than 10% of any one species, 20% of any one genus, or 30% of any family.) Tree replacements in the existing parking islands are an improvement, currently there are several ash trees likely infested with EAB. To: From: Date: Subject: Review Summary SIF No. 12337.00 Brandon Anderson, PE, City Engineer City of Apple Valley Tom Sachi, PE, Senior Engineer Matthew Pacyna, PE, Principal December 14, 2018 Review of Redevelopment Site — Cedar Avenue at 149th Street Traffic Impact Study Apple Valley, MN Introduction As requested, SRF has completed a review of the Redevelopment Site — Cedar Avenue at 149th Street Traffic Impact Study document, dated November 6, 2018 completed by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. The proposed development is located in the southwest quadrant of the Cedar Avenue/149th Street intersection in the City of Apple Valley. Review of the traffic impact study identified the following questions and comments for consideration. Review Summary Based on our review, the following items were identified. Underlined text indicates potential study modification considerations. 1. Site Trip Generation — The trip generation and pass -by trip reduction estimate approach using the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition is reasonable for the midday and p.m. peak hours, based on the previous study completed. The rounding of the trips allows for a conservative estimate of the trip generation. 2. Trip Distribution and Assignment — The directional distribution is reasonable. However, the routing of development related traffic shown in Exhibit 4 is inadequate. Currently, no vehicles exiting the site are shown proceeding east on 149th Street and turning left to travel north on Glenda Drive to access 147th Street. It would be reasonable to assume that a portion of vehicles destined north on Cedar Avenue or east on 147th Street may use Glenda Drive. Further review of queuing and operations at the 147th Street/Glenda Drive intersection should be completed to determine if there is expected to be any impacts due to this routing. 3. Intersection Capacity Analysis a. The analysis approach and existing condition results are reasonable. b. While not noted specifically in the document, the build out and horizon background analysis assumed a background growth rate of one-half (0.5) percent, which is consistent with historical trends within the area and the Dakota County 20 -year growth project factor (typical growth is between 0.5 and 1.5 percent growth per year). Therefore, the no -build analysis provides an accurate assessment. The growth rates should be noted within the Build -Out Background Analysis section. ONE CARLSON PARKWAY, SUITE 150 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55447 763.475.0010 I WWW.SRFCONSULTING.COM Brandon Anderson, PE, City of Apple Valley December 14, 2018 Redevelopment Site - Cedar Avenue at 149th Street Traffic Impact Study Review Page 2 c. Under the Year 2019 Background Capacity Analysis, the overall delay during the midday peak hour at the Glenda Drive and 149th Street, Granada Avenue and 147th Street, and CSAH 42 and Granada Avenue intersections improves when compared to the existing conditions. These improvements, while minor, are counter intuitive with the volume increase expected as a result of the assumed background growth. d. Under the Year 2030 Horizon Background Capacity Analysis, the overall delay during the midday peak hour at the Glenda Drive and 149th Street, improves when compared to the Year 2019 Background conditions. This improvement, while minor, is counter intuitive with the volume increase expected as a result of the assumed background growth. e. Under the Year 2019 Build Capacity Analysis, the overall delay during the p.m. peak hour at the CSAH 42 and Pennock Avenue intersection improves when compared to both the existing and Year 2019 Background conditions. This improvement is counter intuitive with the volume increase expected as a result of the assumed background growth and development trips. f. It should be noted that the decrease in delay shown at the CSAH 42 and Granada Avenue intersection is expected as additional right -turning vehicles are added to the intersection; these right -turning vehicles are expected to experience minimal delay. Under the Year 2030 Horizon Background Capacity Analysis, the overall delay during the p.m. peak hour at the Glenda Drive/149th Street and Glenda Drive/147th Street intersections improves when compared to the Year 2019 Background conditions. These improvements, while minor, is counter intuitive with the volume increase expected as a result of the assumed background growth. h. Further explanation should be provided for why there is a significant increase in delay at the Glenda Drive and 147th Street intersection between Year 2030 Horizon Background and Build conditions, as well as justification for other improvements noted within this section. g. 4. Queuing Analysis a. Existing and background queues are not noted within the 149th Street Queue Summary table. This could provide a comparison to baseline conditions. b. Given the expected blockage of the eastern driveway during the p.m. peak hour, "Do Not Block Intersection" signing should be installed at each driveway entrance. c. The queuing along Glenda Drive at 147th Street should be reviewed given the expected degradation in operations under Year 2030 Horizon Build Conditions and the recommended re-routing of trips to Glenda Drive. 5. Conclusions and Recommendations — A review of the trip assignment routing should be completed to include a portion of exiting vehicles utilizing Glenda Drive north of 149th Street. Additionally, a review of the intersection capacity analysis should be completed to determine why counter -intuitive changes in delay are occurring if signal timing was assumed to remain the same. Lastly, further explanation should be included as to why the intersection operations during the p.m. peak hour at the Glenda Drive and 147th Street intersection degrade significantly under year 2030 Horizon Build conditions. It should be noted that this degradation is not expected under Year 2019 Build Conditions. Brandon Anderson, PE, City of Apple Valley December 14, 2018 Redevelopment Site - Cedar Avenue at 149th Street Traffic Impact Study Review Page 3 6. CSAR 42 and Granada Avenue Westbound Right -Turn Lane — Although not included within the traffic study, the County is exploring the possibility of constructing a westbound right -turn lane from CSAH 42 to Granada Avenue. Given the proximity of the Granada Avenue and Glenda Avenue intersection to the location of the proposed turn lane, this intersection would ideally be closed east of Granada Avenue. Glenda Avenue would then be realigned to the internal drive lane immediately west of O'Reilly Auto Parts connecting to 149th Street. This re-routing would cause additional circulation along Glenda Avenue and Granada Avenue. Additionally, the McDonalds parking lot may become a "cut -through" option for motorists on Granada Avenue looking to access Glenda Avenue. Further discussion regarding McDonald's access driveways would be necessary prior to construction of the westbound right -turn lane. 7. Other Considerations — The proposed site -plan appears to provide adequate storage for the drive-thru queue. Given that 149th Street is a private roadway, the occasional eastbound queues along 149th Street that extend beyond the eastern site access during the p.m. peak hour are not expected to be an issue. The recommended "Do Not Block Intersection" signs are appropriate and should help mitigate internal queuing. The proposed layout also provides adequate circulation throughout the site, however, it was observed that the drive aisles within the parking lots north and south of 149th Street are slightly skewed from each other. If possible, it is recommended to align these drive aisles directly across from each other. Ae 9N0191.1e WOO HeOleAelerIDIANVVA (610-Ste,59 .101e NW,. AS NOCZ uns /53.A 3eNee0 AISN3AINA 0552 Ole 53,1O053,INV Ne011'ATINer Mee WOH(OlkalM1 O. etement alvo Va.moon...ombe 101,14.1l. AO SW I 3O SY NV1d311S V.1.0 NNW ASTIVA 31221‘1V 1N31111d013A30 3/VISHSINI )JOi a3avdaua 213.I.N33 ONIddOHS $' 321VflOS S3INU. CEDAR AVENUE NO110112711SNO0 2,10d ION - AHVNINI-13Hd McDONALD'S z z 602 111V 0 z w .,-. 1 a ,!, g 2 ! t iI09 1 a '3 5 i P i i: g g a g E R 5 2 33 • 'a 2 q OVERALL SITE DATA TABLE ,2 2.2 3 L‘g 6 ®00e0e0 o oe0000c,ee0000000 11 ., .i.,..Alial MAE, MI ANNIMIR MUM IMMie =AMMAN MA moisgmcmisgmwarmil..,,g.,., 222, We Glelled ,.... 2.2 Apo popeoel e eee$810 eAeunASIpee se wane {epee.] sues. pue el* etp yes, melee. leen>. seA we60,6 - 9202 .22Z .2222q222anON 522>P Nsrd 211$1202s1.22Sueld1OVO,J61.0 £142215/2 elddV - soll!2.2A...Ved .1.1.22222um3m-02012 >2 59101511332. WOO 1.19101-1-9311.1119.4, a331113 1.33.9 91.3.13/19, e11.95e a 1.33.11/10033P a 3,131 9.03o1Ne.sez 1.110H0411.1D1 ..I919391991.10 91.1 444 P. kW 93.9091.0 9911190/110 191.1 31.991920 NNpNe 69. Dv -az 81.0211011.1 eneewoe, 133roua wN NVId 3dV3SGNVI 41033NNINI A3114331.4 1N3WdO13A3O 31tl1S2131N1 aoi 0311Wa3ad 2131N30 ONIddOHS 32IVfOS S31NIl i o LANDSCAPE LEGEND 0 0 R H, LANDSCAPE KEYNOTES 8 „ 000 oI NO110111WWSNOO NOS ION ANVNIWIl321d l 0 2N HEMEFOCALLI .9.9.99399.99.1w1w .00I199P9P...0.9.990.199.1991.1..1..9„9 a .aobw,aw esnea43.1.,.. ,�-�, 99.9.9 . 9. POW/WU, •..nII.w.-0 a.,>, 903.9.11919 919999909 W111139..911999.99 9 13e1.0.8 - 81.OZ 'LO JepwenoN Exp-NOId 3d43S0NO1 lTsieeVSoe1d1040W6ise0 81Re11eA eldd4 - SOIINOd\vaoyed eleleie)ukk301 3MLIN AEI 3,0 WCON210F1,13-ININ Vu L640 59 14.1011n..NHEE l�ins`15. nrv3nv U.3.n ossc DNA .53,1313.tl ONV,2101-1,31WIN 840Z U.IOH <<<AaIW!N 1053 141 3,3 133HS 213/03 V10S3NNINI A311VA 3lddV 1N3Wd013A30 31V1S2131NI 210d 0321Vd921d 2131N30 ONIddOHS 321 Vfl OS S3P111 O O o y U V) z J a H z w ce a0 Ou J w w w 1- NG CENTER 0 w (7 z z a_ z 0 1— co z 0 1- 0 w 0 w z z_ z 0 0 Y 0 LU J J w J a a N0II0fHISNOO bOd ION - ) HVNIWI13Hd woa, as i% gU 1 Sheet List Table 1 Sheet Title COVER SHEET SITE PLAN SITE PLAN SITE PLAN GRADING PLAN 22 UTILITY PLAN UTILITY PLAN UTILITY PLAN LANDSCAPE PLAN Sheet Number C000 PROJECT TEAM: z w OJw>v�z,n o_we O wzo w 0 w z W wWOO�w wNwc�aa w w a =oismsi>wwso,oµwwiro, auasu no.nn w treys 5msiaossv weo,oµ,reiwrAaooiewsss wsoo,..neoow,. mown Nowo>oosw000=osuo,»ao,muwsroosooa 13osmnsem a=w.»,„ouroosrvawnxpswi ..6g L-8I0Z'CO JO4wanON Omp 133HS 211A00-031lOO4S.d10V30Isa0 BIAOII.A VddV-SO114JOd\SJOulied O1e1SJOlu IVd01OM1\N AEI .1015,3,1 W001,1011,,INIIN %NM LOWS,. 3,401,1 4,101.71. IS NH, 3,nS 30113MI 1115113.0 DS, 10N11.53,1JOSSVGNIV,101-1,31,11>1 C1 WOH<<<AalWDI LL, 0, X ivo 52U.V.f3' "tn1CLI's:110',1gTrvs Gil koanD111 ,L,10 10,0, VI, NV -1d 311S VIOS3NNIVJ A311VA 31ddll IN3Wc1073A3C1 31V1S2131N1 HOd 03i1Vd3ild 2131N30 ONIddOHS 3avniDS S31/1111 M h.11 cT, g 88 8 z w L10 SITE PLAN NOTES CEDAR AVENUE SEE SHEET C402 — - - ayst—.2tr.— - - nNDAV VCIVNVHD 0 CEDAR AVENUE 1 NolionaisNoo HO J ION - AHVNIVII13Hd 41111111 c„ 0 8)0 • / \ \ , _., zilar lciliP66. _1 Cl`T FM f I-11 1 frit f 1517"-C2 (5 I '5 LI 1_ HI - til -1 4 tliAtgilLIJIfi T - (-5/ -8I Or . I n u, \`, b •\.".`". ,...., k 1 .41::: ---.) rti , , 'i _ II __--rti ;..„, 1 r 3ANCI VOVNVHD 150TH STREET WEST se,,k,e po.nn 1,s 5amiaoss‘e pue Aq uoirrne u003,110.1 Jadaltlui p, agne1 1,1.0.1d sem 111.1311,,,1101131,e ,13.6 N111,11,,,,,, .1/1.1.11,,,R.1..e .10,1 W11., OVERALL SITE DATA TABLE RATIO REQUIRED" PARKING REQUIRED 5 0 0 5 0 0 9 "" IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT THERE WILL BE A SHARED PARKING AGREEMENT BENVEEN THE TENANTS OF THE THREE BUILDINGS ..651- 81.00 '00 JBIUBAON OMP -Wild 3115-63 s1.4S.Id \ GVO\O!.(11 0.11.A .IddV .11!Imd \ mulmd .1.1mlu IV \AG] OMIVN XVO .1015.3,1 L64 59 3,401. 4.1 JS Na¢3o `153.3.3nv xsa,wn ossc WO (<<AalWDI NOM 9END3-1:, -13H A8 NAV. ,1053 Stl 31.5 NV -1d 31IS VIOS3NNIW A311VA 3lddV 1N3WdO73A3O 31V1S2131N1 ilOd O2HVdald 2131N30 ONIddOHS 321tll OS S3V111 z � y U CEDAR AVENUE • NOIIOf1HISNOO HOd ION - ) HVNIWI13Hd ® •ate a. .roe 00 0 J r \\Av v gA L o r �I 0 z w O w OVERALL SITE DATA TABLE RATIO aEWIRED• 8 8 LLL - 5 5 KEYNOTE LEGE 00000000000000000000000® l 1.1:1.1 4011,011.+ �1 111=n.11sIMAIRAsswvM,o11.1soUPa.. sussas sa n1Fl owws�s031.asnIwLVR11 ue Lux.osN9nsuaisepwss�ass�ossa wMa��am�xa��sOosiiu X660.6 -8100 'OZ i66.6AON OMP NVld 311Sb311666S661d\0VO10,66O E0A61I6A 6IddV - SOIII1JOd15i661,6d 61615,6161V\3a1N AEI 3,0 L04 60-459 o��ssk IS N3ol.,15.3:1N a¢3nv uisa3nwn DS. :ON11.53,130SSVONV,a101-1,131WIN WY CI UJOH <<<AalW!N NOM oar.,3a, 3,06, nata 1053 141 3,3 NV -1d 31IS VIOS3NNIW A3 -111/A 33ddtl 1N3WdO73A3O 31V1S2131N1 and 031t1tld3ad 2131N30 ONIddOHS 321tll OS S31/1111 f N LL y U NOIIOf1HISNOO HOd ION - ) HVNIWI13Hd CEDAR AVENUE 1 1 1 1 OVERALL SITE DATA TABLE 8 8 MIRED PARKING SPACES: 3f1N3AV VOVNVHO N\15.55:. l ani seams, pm aaaapao, appal ra,a,w ays poi saaxasv wa waµMiarplanaaaa wa.1,1,w:ataw,. maga Nowoapa. uoaaoauo,adaaa waroasnoa paamnsem apalnalN I3aaegad m ��« Was,iaopoaalaa oa,..1.1,:eao,Rowa ..I pawosom aaaop aaawaaoaow aaa,11601 laanxp swi Wa00.0 -BLOZ 'LO iapwaAaN OMP NVld 311St3\laa4SLald\CVO \u6ISa0 E\AallaA addV - .1111Jod\SiaWad ajejSiaju IV\3al 3M1\N AEI 3,0 WCON210F1,13-ININ Vu L64 -109-459 3,4014,1 mss is Na¢3ol.,15.3,13nv uisa3nwn ossc DNA .53,1313SSV ONV,2101,A3INIIN ME CI UJOH <<<AalW!N 1053 141 Id Gil 11 1,111,11,,, kElanDI I I 3,3 NV1d ONIOV IO VIOS3NNIW A311VA 31.144 1N3WdO73A3O 31V1S2131N1 aOd 02244224 2131N30 ONIddOHS 321tll OS S31/1111 M w 0 z w 0 w NOIIOf1HISNOO Hi:DJ ION - ANVNIWI13Hd r nu, ---� -- CEDAR AVENUE 9 — - s CO zz CC 0 0») i 1 150TH STREET WEST SEE SHEET C502 J 311N3AV `_D VOVNV HO ==9' l se,laossvws wowkag. no.nn w ae,s=oiLsemixtssv ws woµMwN Aa uoiewsss we uon,,owne pow,.mow.Nowo>oosw.o3osuo,»awmuouemaenaa 130»mn se.a=w.»n»u=esad..130Cka�»�ewo oao�o�ws o=iNssrow�wRoi os oio,o���oso,a so65oo wss�ao��o�ow w.»����rvawnxp swi we00.0-B900'00 iapwanoN OMP NVId ONI0V0O531S1aa4Soeld\CVO 1o6ISa0 E0ABIRA add - So114Jod1Siaolied .1.1.alo IV\AG] 3M11N AEI 01 VGLI mssN N 3 eV N 5.3,13AV uisv,NnosQ UJOH <<<AaIW!N 01, 3011 1,1:1 tl 1111.11 I.J11H, 1E02011 SV 3,0 NV1d ONIOV IO VIOS3NNIW A311VA 3lddtl 1N3WdO73A3O 31V1S2131N1 HOd03T1Vd3Tld H 2131N30 ONIddOHS 321tll OS S31/1111 9 o9 22-2 CEDAR AVENUE 7 o0 0, xc t - v _—LofO`�as> az ohm 0 -EN P/ 9 -- SII IIIc NOIIOf HISNOO HOd ION - ) HVNIWIl3Hd l H 00'896 add - dS+00£'8 /:7 �1rF ll SO11uaod h '1MrF�T 1�OI ;74 i7 ' iglu E. r T TI 6 o 0 Q 1 0 .W.Ml orlln+l.eq1.• .M.ve•s,iRu��n•mx.R ^+«ouiM+d^I.R+^nmm,,,1l.1N b 0 2 0 w g � S 555 11414 l U000.8 - OW( 'LO 109wawN OMP NVId ON IOV219-5311004SUR d10V30IS00 (\90110A 0999 - So1141od\s10u11ed 01e1S101u IV\OI 3M11 N 3,0 L640-1.-lee lel. es Na¢ 3.S 1S3N,,onrv3nv uisa3nwn ogee UJOH <<<AalW!N MI, oEereeiee 1053 aSeta Id ell Le eel ,ire,e keaeS111 elVa NV1d ONIOV IO VIOS3NNIW A311VA 3lddtl 1N3WdO13A3O 31V1S2131N1 and 031e1tld2ad 2131N30 ONIddOHS 321tll OS S31/1111 N elej y rL 1• CEDAR AVENUE J° • 3nN DAV VOVNIVH9 r NOIIOf1HISNOO HOd ION - AHVNIWI13Hd z w 0 w l eelse,laossv wewoµwwiro, auaee"wee.ee freeseLeso,eieossee we woHeeewN eeooieweoe pee ooeea,owoeoow,.mown Nowoeo.see 000eoeuoeado,a»moemosooa eosmn se. e 1.1=10,0,011eemcee, e1 peeeelLes oei.osro wa„o,Rowe ee.ee oawoso,a eee.oe Pee s,aoeeoeoel w.»e,eeee, we„oeee swi we00.0 - OLOZ 'CO iapwanON OMP NVId ONIQVUO-53\P.'SoeId\CVO 1o6Isa0 E\AB IRA addV - solIOJodlIVd01OM11N AEI 3,0 WCON210F1,3-ININ Vu L64 -16,3-459 o��ssk �s o.S 153mon Na¢ 3rv3nv uisa3nwn w¢ DNA .S3.4313SSV 131V,2101-1,3,1IN 840Z UJOH <<<AalW!N 1053 141 Id Gil 11 1,111,11,,, kElanDI I I 3,3 NV1d Jllllllfl VIOS3NNIW A3 -111/A 3lddtl 1N3WdO73A3O 31V1S2131N1 and 031t1tld3ad 2131N30 ONIddOHS 321tll OS S31/1111 MLLII w U z w 0 J II od2®o-•11 e: NOIIOf1HISNOO HOd ION - ) HVNIWI13Hd J. U w W x 0) 1 1 _ - -- __-ms-¢ - r CEDAR AVENUE •1 1 CEDAR AVENUEI OG0 H -1 L � br c. -1—c• 3(1N3AV ) =_ ID C_='' 1 VOVNV210 r\ 1771 I I / 1 / 1 I 1 3AIaa VUVNVaJ o 150TH STREET WEST l epi smeieosv we woµtaiwq no.nn as treyssmeieossv we woµ,wiwr Aa uoieweoe we aonew»woe yaw,.mow.Nawo>oosw.a=oeua,»awmuweroasnea ea»mn sem a 1.1e11,"01 pap 13. rvawnxpswi we0119 - 9900 '/0 i9nwBn9N 6mp NVld 11011111-9011994SueId10V01u6Is90 9\A911.A 01UV - s911IIJOd\sJBulied 91eIsialu IV \101 3M11N AEI 01 I/GM L640-160-45 awes. .N 3 e� N s3N, AV `�sn3iownosee UJOH <<<I(alW!N son sso tl 11111,11 1.0, 00001 Sul ss 3,0 NV1d Jllllllfl VIOS3NNIW A311VA 31ddV 1N3WdO73A3O 31V1S2131N1 ilOd 03T1Vd3Tld COC 2131N30 ONIddOHS 321tll OS S31/1111 — — — — — a— — — — . CEDAR AVENUE 6 c c NOIIOf1HISNOO HOd ION - AHVNIW113 1d GEN‘14181DP AVENUE ° ©1,4Mik Namak ° o i dS +00£'8 S,O11I L Od `l \ L' rr N 0 J 0 0 —1 wileiiYW�"iliu r°I�Yr°lYiisWYE—igi..0riiiru�Y°�iilirwrevl�W�Y-YYWI^^iiW�YYWwYfi impiiipariicuilov —wlil'sem°°=°.b,Ne., pre esea,m,y,0. W1b1°ow°uel°s e„°es,o wumnsu ue males°teas°6501313°°swe,°o,eaa..10°10601...sou nue we09.8 - 9IO9 '90 JBOUBAON 6mp NV19 91111111-9011aa4Sueld\ 0%0.6, .1] DA.IRA 91tl6V - SOIII1,Odls,aul,ed alels,alu lV\3al OM11N 3 0 UTILITY PLAN NOTES 0000000000 _ Y 10 e w 3 0< 3 3 3 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 od2®o–♦ 11 l AEI 3,0 L64 59 of. is Na¢3o l�ins`153monrv3nv.5213nwn DS. DNA .53,1313SSV ONV,2101,A3INIIN BUY UJOH <<<AalW!N 1053 141 Id Gil 11 1,111,11,,, kElanDI I I 3,3 NV1d Jllllllfl VIOS3NNIW A311VA 31ddV 1N3WdO73A3O 31V1S2131N1 and 03atld3ad 2131N30 ONIddOHS 321tll OS S31/1111 f N u, U p CEDAR AVENUE • i ! �ID\t =I 1-751 LZ E NOIIOf1HISNOO HOd ION - AHVNIWI13Hd LLJ g LJ L 3f1N3AV VQVNVN'J EEgg w KEYNOTE LEGEND l =oismai>ossv wao»µwwir no.nnas ire•s=oismai>ossv wa°»µ,rep.»n°°°pewee waoo,.woeoaw,.mow. Nawo3o.s4oo03.110J»ao,m,i waroasoaa pe»mn sa.a•=w.»1 pap .oa asad.oI .o.omws a=iNasro lue.n..oa wawn.P swi we00.8 - 8100 LO iapwanoN 6mp NVId A1FILL 0-9011aa4SueId1OVO1u6ISa0 0.11.A 81tl6V - So114iod\S .Wd .1.1.alu IVd01OM11N AEI 01 16,1 WCONLIOH,13-ININ Vu L640-109-45 mssN DNA 3 e� 3.6 N s3N, N3w/ u��3nwnwQCI UJOH <<<AalW!N der tl 1111.1 ,11H, kElanDI HVH SH 3,0 NV1d 3dV3SdNV1 VIOS3NNIW A311VA 31ddV 1N3WdO73A3O 31V1S2131N1 c and 03atld3ad 2131N30 ONIddOHS y J 3aVnbS S31/1111 LANDSCAPE LEGEND J 8 KEYNOTES 0 y 3 8 8 000 CEDAR AVENUE e till 41 fig 40 F.)1 Z U �I I _-T Fl TTI NOIIOf1HISNOO HOd _ON - ) HVNIWI13Hd 8 8 8 Lt 5 @x 8 _ ^_ a 8 LANDSCAPE SUMMA 8 8 l z y a o 8 Pe h 5 > bOo! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ivy 6J6i01-6-eenoam 1g61��� � _ ������L.seepeo 664e7,066.uau,.666=we.r:6.66 e����� �o o��a� n �� �,����o� ��� �., ���ooao�e.��9��tie=, � tiw���e�v�as����aal65eoo.61,103Uo3ea41..1.060.,U.MX9SM1 we40.0- OW/ 'LO iagwawN OMP NVld 3dVSS0NV111\1BO4S Id\GV30ISa0E\A8IRA 8055- S0114wd\Siaulied BIRISwIU IV\301 3M11N d Ariel Site Plan f1NAV H` CI O . S OOE'B NW. :A211V/V)3,lddV Hi 4 O J Proposed Site Plan - dated 10/03/18 U co N- I I SITE PLAN Updated 10.10.18 NMITM70 wmloe�7aprysaw g Z8 -56£ -£GG Ned 91 Z8 -56£ -£GG 4d ZZ90911 `09V01113 .1G Z31'A00 .M BbSZ 'ONI 'SOIQYLLS ii‘21Y10213W NW `A3TIVA 3'IddV SDOU £OH S,O I WIOd L4=tv1:M77MI&IIM %5-,L Alucobond FCO Stars Scale 3/16" = 1'-0" �d old 4 4 Scale 3/32" = 1'-0" /A W w Th Scale 3/32" = 1'-0" South Elevation - 74.66 r— East Elevation - North Elevation - 74.66 ra a, 0- c0 00 E 000 00 g E co o o co LL .F; LI En ) g c o 2 Scale 3/32 = 1-0" Red LED Band Red LED Band 11 r7 11 1 +1 • 0 w c 5 CO JI4-1 Scale 3/32 = 1-0" uJ uJ co (V Kfp II Z J Z Zdp pz w WnoJ Za Z CO 75 2 W W W mQQYH 2_i N(7 Ua0U2U Zvi 0a 2 wpyp �< w, z7WQK 72 ❑, QW JJ as W7 W =0]Q a rt0 JK22Z W Z U-(.7 Q=nI-E 1- W Oz w\ K 2i Q U Z= N Z w2WWO �av�0� p,>7 .,_u1Lu uMi QRZ R'7 M>co W it W(n WN0 2 ROWS OF RED FLEX LED %E-,8 %Z-,6 6 2 ROWS OF RED FLEX LED %E-,8 %Z-,6 6 ENTRANCE DISPLAY with D.F. Skeleton Neon - Side View - ANCE DISPLA wm 1.,@0,pry,aw g1 Z9 -56£ -£GG ped 91 Z9 -56£ -£LL 4d ZZ909 11 `09V01113 .1G Z31:K)0 'M 8b5Z -0 NI 'SOIQYIJ S ii‘21110L w NW `A3TIVA 3'IddV SOOQ £OH S,OTII LIIOd 9 TOTAL BUILDING J 0 z - I J � O 0 0 06 Lilz w = z H z • E .L .L 0 0 0 N N 0 N 0- J II 1' 1 QII 1' lirens i 00 NN tI IQ 14 1=1 I N 0 Wir Ldo 00000 0010 ramonm 611115 - 611111; 1111 1111 El IMIF1 1=1 ISI 0 0 LE, Por_Apple Valley_Seating I .2 II -II NNf\ll1\ll1\l J II 1' 1 QII 1' lirens i 00 NN tI IQ 14 1=1 I N 0 Wir Ldo 00000 0010 ramonm 611115 - 611111; 1111 1111 El IMIF1 1=1 ISI 0 0 LE, Por_Apple Valley_Seating I .2 wm 190@9901,9u 91 Z9-56£9£GG ped 91 Z9- 56£ -£LL 4d ZZ90911 `O9V01113 .1S Z3J 00 .M 8b5Z 'ONI 'SOIQYLLS ii‘21Y10213W NW `AaTIVA I'IddY SDOU £OH S,OTIIZ2IOd F -z FL-, 0 z 0> w wm 10,@°19,1,0w 91 Z9-56£9£GG ped 91 Z9- 56£ -£GG 4d 99909 11 `09H911l9 .1S Z3J 09 .M 8b5Z -ON I 'SO IQYLLS ii‘21Y10213 W NW `AaTIVA I'IddY SDOU £OH S,OTIIZ2IOd H Z z oW 91 91 91 91 9 9 9 2 mF 81. O 0 O O ESS STEEL DOOR 9 0 H JI Scale: 3/1 G' = -0' woo g1 Z8 -56£ -£GG ped 91 Z8 -56£ -£LL 4d ZZ909 11 `09V01113 .1G Z31A00 'M 8175Z 'ONI 'SOIQYLLS ii‘21Y10213W NW `AaTIVA I'IddF� SDOU £OH S,O'I IIiHOd z O w O oz< U OU t 0 LE, 0 0 \‘‘ \‘‘ z 0 —J w 141 CZ 0 0 O CZ Nm wv woo g1 Z8 -56£ -£GG ped 91 Z8 -56£ -£LL 4d ZZ90911 `09V01113 .1G Z31'A00 .M BbSZ -ON I 'SO IQYLLS ii‘21Y10213 W NW `AaTIVA I'IddY SDOU £OH S,O'I IIiHOd 0 0 AK ELEVATION w woog1 Z8 -56£ -£GG xed 91 Z8 -56£ -£GG 4d ZZ90911 `09V01113 .1G Z31'A00 .M BbSZ 'ONI 'SOIQYLLS ii‘21Y10213W NW `AaTIVA I'IddY SDOU £OH S,O'I IIiHOd RENDERING woog1 Z8 -56£ -£GG Ned 91 Z8 -56£ -£GG 4d ZZ90911 `09V01113 .1G Z31'A00 .M BbSZ ONI 'SOICLI'LLS il‘21Yra' L w NW `AaTIVA I'IddF� SDOU £OH S,OTIIIIIOd Re T D •Zc4:1:l 4 42:1_0J,'_LN 4;1:: ACCENT COLOR EXTERIOR FINIShES CULTURED LIMESTONE WROUGHT IRON WWI k 7 0. \ .� u. $2 § ). §j co " §j aco - am E Z \k §\ u� .g. 22 wa k2 22 o_§ (\ �� O§ y Veneer Brick & Mortar overlay M-28 D.F. Illuminated Monument - ALUMINUM CAP AND SILL, SW6148 WOOL SKEIN PAINTED FINISH. SIGN ILLUMINATED USING WHITE LED MODULES. * DIRECT BURY POLE. a s s a ... •.•• .•• Apple., Valley ITEM: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: SECTION: 6.A. December 19, 2018 Other Business Description: Review of Upcoming Schedule and Other Updates Staff Contact: Joan Murphy, Department Assistant Department / Division: Community Development Department ACTION REQUESTED: N/A SUMMARY: Next Planning Commission Meetings: Wednesday, January 9, 2019 - 7:00 p.m. • Public hearing applications due by 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday, December 12, 2018 • Site plan, variance applications due by 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday, December 26, 2018 Wednesday, January 16, 2019 - 7:00 p.m. • Public hearing applications due by 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday, December 19, 2018 • Site plan, variance applications due by 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday, January 2, 2019 Next City Council Meetings: Thursday, December 27, 2018 - 7:00 p.m. Thursday, January 10, 2019 - 7:00 p.m. BACKGROUND: N/A BUDGET IMPACT: N/A