The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About04/04/1990PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CITY OF APPLE VALLEY APRIL 4, 1990 1. CALL TO ORDER The April 4, 1990 meeting of the Apple Valley Planning Commission was called to order by Chairman Robert Erickson at 7:32 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of the City of Apple Valley City Hall. Members Present Chairman Erickson, Members Carlson, Felkner, Sterling, Kleckner, Gowling, and Weldon. Staff Present: Richard Kelley, Meg McMonigal, Linda Brinkhaus, and Dennis Welsch. Others Present: See sign -in sheet. 2. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA The agenda was approved following an amendment to table Item 6D- Rasmusson Setback Variance - until the April 18, 1990 meeting. MOTION: A motion was made by Member Sterling, seconded by Member Gowling, to approve the amended agenda. The motion carried unanimously. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF MARCH 21, 1990 MEETING MOTION: A motion was made by Member Carlson, seconded by Member Weldon, to approve the minutes of the March 21, 1990 meeting with the following changes: ( Page 4, first paragraph, second sentence should read "Kelley responded that no rezoning will actually occur until the transfer of property has been made by H & Z Developers to Wayne Bishop." /Page 7, first paragraph, first sentence should read "She said that based upon Planning Staff demographics, 1,550 people live adjacent to this site..." Page 7, third paragraph, first sentence should read "Chairman Erickson asked the Park and Recreation Advisory Committee to consider whether park land should be dedicated..." The motion carried 7 - 0. Planning Commission Minutes April 4, 1990 Page 2 4. CONSENT AGENDA (One motion sends items needing no discussion on to the City Council with the staff recommendations. None. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Pennock Shores 4th Addition Comp Plan Amendment to MD, Rezoning to M -4C, Preliminary Plat and Site Plan Review /Building Permit Authorization LOCATION: 142nd Street, Lot 1, Block 1, Hamlet Manor Homes PETITIONER: Diedrich Builders and Builders Finance (PC90- 017 -ZSB) STAFF REPORT: April 4, 1990 by Associate Planner Meg McMonigal Chairman Robert Erickson opened the public hearing and asked Associate Planner Meg McMonigal to present her report. Associate Planner Meg McMonigal provided a staff summary of the proposed project to amend the comprehensive plan from high density residential to medium density residential and to rezone from "M -7C" to "M -4C" and to approve a preliminary plat for 26 townhouse units. She explained that this project is a lower density proposal than was originally proposed on the site (8 units per acre versus 6 units per acre) . She illustrated elevations of the new row house design and noted that soils on the site have been corrected to provide for development. However, some of the soil correction work may need to be changed and some corners of the existing structures will set closer to the right -of -way lines rather than allowed under the City Codes. A five foot setback variance will be needed at three locations. The preliminary plat will need to have turnarounds provided for emergency vehicles and a landscape plan, which is prepared by a landscape architect and provides for landscaping in an amount of 2.5% or more of the construction value. Project proponent, Bill Diedrich, explained that the project will be similar to the Pennock Shores project except the buildings will be designed somewhat different. Individual units will cost between $70,000 and $90,000. They will be one -level units with an option for a split level at the rear. He stated there would be no problem with dedication of an outlot to the HRA. Member Kleckner asked for clarification regarding setbacks, soils location, footings, foundations, and utilities and asked whether existing improvements would have to be removed in order to rebuild on the site. Diedrich responded that they would have to be removed. Member Sterling asked for clarification regarding old foundations. Member Felkner asked for further details on the landscape plan. Planning Commission Minutes April 4, 1990 Page 3 Mary Quinn, 14325 Glenda Drive, a resident of the Pennock Shores Development, stated that she was happy to see this development because it was more compatible with the existing Pennock Shores project. She asked for clarification regarding shade trees and where they could be planted adjacent to the pipeline easement. Staff noted that trees can be planted 15 to 20 feet from the individual unit sites, but cannot be planted in the pipeline easement as per the pipeline easement requirements. A general discussion of plantings in the pipeline easement ensued. It was noted that the association will maintain the landscaping in the area. Ellen Brown, 14338 Glenda Drive, asked for clarification regarding the dimensions between units and the amount of open space available. The Staff responded that there will be at least 110 to 130 feet of space between the units. Mary Iverson, 14362 Pennock, expressed concern regarding the land- scaping between the two developments. Chairman Erickson closed the public hearing.. MOTION: A motion was made by Member Sterling, seconded by Member Kleckner, to recommend approval of the comprehensive plan amendment from high density to medium density. The motion carried 7 - 0. MOTION: A motion was made by Member Sterling, seconded by Member Kleckner, to recommend approval of the rezoning from "M -7C" to "M -4C ". The motion carried 7 - 0. MOTION: A motion was made by Member Gowling, seconded by Member Weldon, to recommend approval of the preliminary plat and the three setback variances identified by the Staff. The motion carried 7 - 0. MOTION: A motion was made by Member Weldon, seconded by Member Sterling, to recommend approval of the building and site plan authori- zation, including emergency turnarounds, additional parking, and a completed landscape plan meeting the City's specifications. The motion carried unanimously 7 - 0. B. Zoning Ordinance Amendment - Escrow Accounts PETITIONER: City of Apple Valley STAFF REPORT: April 4, 1990 by City Planner Richard Kelley City Planner Richard Kelley provided a background report on the zoning ordinance amendment, which would allow the City to establish escrow funds for projects which are not currently covered by the City's fee structure. He noted that the requirement for an escrow account is not mandatory, but may be required by City Staff. A general discussion ensued regarding who pays for project consultant fees when projects are not Planning Commission Minutes April 4, 1990 Page 4 built. No further comment was offered by the public or the Commission. Chairman Erickson closed the public hearing. MOTION: A motion was made by Member Carlson, seconded by Member Felkner, to recommend approval of the zoning amendment as proposed by Staff. The motion carried 6 - 0 - 1. 6. LAND USE /ACTION ITEMS A. Valley Way Village 8th Addition - Townhouse Preliminary Plat LOCATION: Northeast Corner of Pilot Knob Road and C.R. #42 PETITIONER: Associated Surveying (PC90- 012 -SB) STAFF REPORT: April 4, 1990 by City Planner Richard Kelley City Planner Richard Kelley noted that there are no completed grading plans available for this site and recommended that the Planning Commission table action on this issue for two weeks. MOTION: A motion was made by Member Carlson, seconded by Member Weldon, to table action on the Valley Way Village 8th Addition townhouse project until the next regular meeting. The motion carried 7 - 0. Prior to introduction of the next item, Member Weldon announced that he would temporarily step down from the Planning Commission and sit in the audience to avoid potential conflicts of interest regarding the next issue. Chairman Erickson explained the Planning Commission's policy regarding potential conflicts of interest and thanked Member Weldon for his action. B. Watersedge - Patio Home Planned Unit Development LOCATION: Southwest Corner of 140th Street and C.R. #11 PETITIONER: Water's Edge, Inc. and H & Z Partners (PC90- 014 -ZSB) STAFF REPORT: April 4, 1990 by City Planner Richard Kelley City Planner Richard Kelley provided a background report regarding the preliminary plat and the planned unit development. He noted that there were slopes that would become the maintenance responsibility of the homeowner's association. He also illustrated poor soils on the site which require a specific placement of housing units on the site. The architectural style landscaping elements and park pathway systems were discussed in detail. The Planning Staff recommended that the pathway proposed within the site should be extended to a cul -de -sac located on the west end of the project in the City of Burnsville. Kelley also noted that the road width for this project will be reduced from 32 feet to 28 feet and will require that no parking signs be placed on one side of the street. The applicant will be required to acquire property from the County along the west end of the project in order to complete final units Planning Commission Minutes April 4, 1990 Page 5 on the site. This parcel of land would be sold by the County for approxi- mately $10,000.00. Applicant Wayne Bishop discussed the plantings along the pipeline and noted Williams Pipeline will allow for no plants except a hedge. He also illustrated that the cul -de -sac along the east end of the project would be moved slightly to provide for better slope maintenance. Member Kleckner asked if slope maintenance and setbacks will be dis- cussed in the development agreement. The answer was yes. Member Carlson asked for Commission comments on the appropriateness of this site for high density versus low density, multi- family develop- ment, especially as it relates to a public amenity like Lake Alimagnet. A general discussion ensued regarding overall housing policy in the City of Apple Valley and the need to provide multi- family projects which are adjacent to or also benefit from major public amenities. City Planner Kelley described the purchase agreements and the process for planned unit development approval. Mr. Bishop stated that the project is currently being marketed and that the project will be completed within a three year period. The current building proposal is to construct three unit clusters at a time. Kelley noted that in addition to all permits and requirements, should the planned unit development change, additional public hearings would be required before the Planning Commission and Council. MOTION: A motion was made by Member Sterling, seconded by Member Felkner, to recommend approval of the planned unit development zoning as per the Staff recommendations. The motion carried 5 - 1, Carlson voted against. MOTION: A motion was made by Member Gowling, seconded by Member Felkner, to recommend approval of the preliminary plat as per the Staff recommendations. The motion carried 5 - 1, Carlson voted against. MOTION: A motion was made by Member Sterling, seconded by Member Gowling, to recommend approval of the building permit and site plan permit authorization as per the Staff recommendations and including additional emergency turnarounds as per the diagram attached to the Staff review. The motion carried 5 - 1. Member Weldon rejoined the Planning Commission. C. Bakers Square Restaurant - Site Plan and Building Permit Authorization LOCATION: 15200 Cedar Avenue PETITIONER: Bakers Square (PC90- 018 -B) STAFF REPORT: April 4, 1990 by City Planner Richard Kelley Planning Commission Minutes April 4, 1990 Page 6 City Planner Richard Kelley provided a review of the site plan and illustrated the circulation plan, parking plans, and landscaping. He noted that landscaping, as currently proposed, does meet the City's re- quirement of 2.5% of the construction value of the building. However, he requested that additional landscaping be placed along the edge of the parking area to screen it from road systems. He described the setback variance required on the north side wherein the code requires a 15 foot setback, but the proposal would allow the building to set at the property line, thus requiring a 15 foot variance. He noted that beyond the property line, it is an additional 40 feet from the property line to the curbline of the entry road. Staff recommended approval of the variance. Mr. Kelley also described the parapet wall along the east side of the project and noted that the parapet wall has to be the same height as the heating - venillating -air conditioning units. The Planning Staff recommended approval of the project subject to a 10 foot offset of landscape materials (landscape materials to be placed outside of public pathway easement and subject to additional landscaping screening in the parking lot). The Staff also recommended the need for cross parking easements with the adjacent site to the south. Finally, the Staff recommended approval of the variances necessary to allow the building to set at the property line along the north edge of the property. NOTION: A motion was made by Member Sterling, seconded by Member Gowling, to recommend building permit and site plan approval as per the Staff recommendations. The motion carried 7 - 0. D. Rasmusson Setback Variance LOCATION: 8635 - 143rd Street Court PETITIONER: H. Jon and Kathleen Rasmusson (PC90- 007 -V) STAFF REPORT: April 4, 1990 by Associate Planner Scott Hickok The Planning Commission consensus was to table any action on the Rasmusson variance case until the applicant and the building official were available to discuss this issue. Staff recommended that this issue be placed on the next Planning Commission agenda, which would be April 18, 1990. No action was necessary. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Multi Housing Policies A general discussion ensued regarding the appropriateness of multi- family apartment housing versus single- family or common wall, detached duplex, or patio homes. The Watersedge project was discussed in detail. No action was taken. Planning Commission Minutes April 4, 1990 Page 7 B. Pennock Avenue Land Uses Community Development Director Dennis Welsch provided a background report and an update of the City Council's study meeting held on March 30, 1990 in which the Council discussed the alternative land use recommenda- tions presented by the Planning Commission regarding land east of Pennock Avenue, west of Cedar Avenue, and north of 138th Street. A general dis- cussion ensued. No action was taken. 8. OTHER BUSINESS None. 9. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 9:50 p.m. kg