Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/19/2019 Minutes CITY OF APPLE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 19, 2019 1. CALL TO ORDER The City of Apple Valley Planning Commission meeting was called to order by Chair Melander at 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Tom Melander, Ken Alwin, Tim Burke, Keith Diekmann, Jodi Kurtz, Paul Scanlan and David Schindler. Members Absent: Staff Present: City Attorney Sharon Hills, City Engineer Brandon Anderson, City Planner Tom Lovelace, Planner Kathy Bodmer and Department Assistant Joan Murphy. 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Chair Melander asked if there were any changes to the agenda. MOTION: Commissioner Burke moved, seconded by Commissioner Diekmann, approving the agenda. Ayes - 7 - Nays - 0. 3. CONSENT ITEMS MOTION: Commissioner Burke moved, seconded by Commissioner Scanlan, approving the minutes of the meeting of May 15, 2019. Ayes - 7 - Nays - 0. 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Apple Valley Golf Course Comprehensive Plan Amendments – PC19-09-P Chair Melander addressed the audience of the process of the public hearing and the role of the Planning Commission. He opened the public hearing at 7:04 p.m. City Planner Tom Lovelace stated Mr. Joel Watrud, the owner of the Apple Valley Golf Course located at 8661 140th Street West, is requesting the following amendments to the City's Comprehensive Land Use Map: 1. Re-designate .5 acres from "PR" (Private Recreation) to "LD" (Low Density Residential) 2. Re-designate 14.5 acres from "PR" (Private Recreation) to "MD" (Medium Density Residential) 3. Re-designate 8 acres from "PR" (Private Recreation) to "HD" (High Density Residential) The 23-acre golf course property is located at the northwest corner of 140th Street West and Garden View Drive. Adjacent uses include single-family residential to the north, single-family, two- family and multi-family residential to the west and south, and multi-family to the east. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes June 19, 2019 Page 2 of 11 The property is currently designated "PR" (Private Recreation). The 2030 Plan created this designation of "Private Recreation" to recognize the current use of the subject property as a privately owned public golf course. This is the only property in the city that has this designation. The property is currently zoned "P" (Institutional). Institutional districts are areas designed to serve the public and quasi-public uses. Permitted uses include schools, public libraries and art galleries, parks and playgrounds, recreational facilities or athletic fields, religious facilities, cemeteries, government facilities, non-profit clubs and lodges, public hospitals and acre facilities, and golf courses. Any re-designation of the property will require a change in the current zoning. He said a wetland delineation report has been prepared for this site. Three wetlands have been identified and delineated. Any development will be subject to all applicable federal, state, and local wetland regulations. It is also noted that an 80-foot wide pipeline easement bisects the property. The location of this utility will impact any development as it is generally understood that uses over a pipeline easement are restrictive and no buildings or landscaping shall be placed within an easement of this type. Chair Melander asked what the height limit would be for an M-8 zoning that is not in the downtown area. Mr. Lovelace replied it would still be three stories. Chair Melander inquired about the pipeline running through the site. Mr. Lovelace answered there is an 80-foot wide easement which uses 2½ acres while the wetlands uses 1½ acres out of the 23 acres total. Commissioner Alwin asked for clarification that this hearing was only about the zoning change. Mr. Lovelace clarified that tonight is not a rezoning but only a Comprehensive Plan re-designation. There is no application for rezoning nor development plan that has been brought forward by the applicant. Their only request is a re-designation of the property. Chair Melander asked for confirmation that the application was made by the owner of the property. Mr. Lovelace answered yes, by Joel Watrud. Commissioner Scanlan asked about the three designations and that those designations may vary as to what probably comes forward. He asked for Mr. Lovelace to talk about high density and the need for more apartments in Apple Valley. Mr. Lovelace said that could be provided. There is a need for more apartments that is metro wide and there are articles in the paper all the time. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes June 19, 2019 Page 3 of 11 Peter Coyle, Larkin Hoffman, representing the Watrud family, reported that golf courses are struggling around the country. He said the owner tried years ago to sell but decided to keep the enterprise going for another 10 years. He added a large open space will attract users and the comp plan process is a forecast. They proposed medium density and high density because there is a high demand for housing and a growing demand for senior housing that is affordable. This land will be a challenge with the pipeline going through it and the wetlands need to go through the regulatory process. He understands the anxiety that goes with it and that Mr. Watrud is a landowner and taxpayer and he has rights too. Randy Neubauer, 13609 Hollins Ct, referenced the City’s mission statement to pledge and promote the health and well-being of its citizens and all who visit the City. He talked about goals and quality development. He said this zoning request is in conflict with the City’s mission statement th and goals. He said in regards to safety, 140 Street is already a very busy street. He felt that high density with 12 units per acre should be located where services are like private shopping and that the bus route has limited services. nd Mike Scherer, 8473 – 142 Street Ct., said there is a business owner who has run an immaculate business over the years and he thinks the City should buy the golf course and keep it as a golf course. He understands there is a need for senior citizen housing and apartment complexes. He said if the need is so great for housing, why does the City not use its own land of 190 acres at Valleywood Golf Course and put that into housing which has extremely better road access rather than cram this proposal into a tiny 23-acre site. If the need is so great, why is the City not using its own land, bulldozing that and putting in condominiums and apartment complexes for seniors. He said in 2011 the City spent $3 million for a brand new club house at Valleywood and if they can spend $3 million on a club house they can certainly buy this golf course and help out a land owner who has been an excellent community member, and help all these people who are here tonight. Jon Kotek, 13583 Hollins Ct, said he drove past an Eagan golf course that was rezoned and it turned into a development and it pained him on how many trees were cut and cleared out of there for that development and considering Apple Valley’s sign has a tree on it he would think we would want to keep the trees a little bit more around here. He said the amount of the aged oaks on this site (Apple Valley Golf Course) it would just kill him to see that kind of stuff get destroyed. Kathy Lundin, 13531 Hollins Ct, commented that this is a peaceful place and she would be devastated by a three-story apartment and stacked townhomes and she thinks it is an extremely poor use of the land. She referenced the Comp Plan Land Use section: “The City seeks to maintain the integrity of existing neighborhoods”. She said the Comp Plan states that: “The land must be compatible with the adjacent properties.” She did not think this would be in scale with the single- family homes that are all around the golf course now. She said this rezoning is in total disagreement with the Apple Valley Comprehensive Plan and if the Planning Commission agrees with the rezoning then the Commission is completely ignoring the City’s Comprehensive Plan. She does not think the citizens of Apple Valley will have much respect for city government that does not follow the guidelines that the City made up themselves. She said the Comp Plan refers to high density areas having other Apple Valley services available. She added that all other Apple Valley apartments are in high density areas not in residential areas. She said that when the Commission CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes June 19, 2019 Page 4 of 11 makes their decision they should think of the people. She said property values will suffer, traffic and noise will be unbearable and beautiful green space filled with trees and ponds will disappear. This is not the right location for apartments. st Michelle Gustafson, 8415 – 141 Ct. W, said this zoning plan will have a detrimental impact on the schools directly surrounding this neighborhood. She believes high density would have an impact on our neighborhood schools. th Vickie Loher-Johnson, 8907 – 138 Street Ct, said the zoning of this property is for recreational use and the owner purchased this land knowing that zoning classification and what the owner did not purchase and has no right to was a lucrative high density residential development opportunity. It is not an issue of anxiety of this neighborhood about change. It is an issue with Apple Valley keeping the promise it made when zoning this site for recreational use and zoning the surrounding property th for single-family low density residential use. She expressed concern for the busy traffic on 140 Street and that Gardenview goes downhill. She understands the demand for housing in Apple Valley and that other areas are available and more appropriate. Derek Ingvalson, 13931 Holyoke Path, expressed concern for the loss of green space and that children can be impacted from this loss because there are significant health benefits to having green space. He had a concern for the water quality in Alimagnet Lake and the impervious surfaces. He said there are different ways to preserve this green space if the City of Apple Valley would purchase this land and turn it into parks. He referenced the Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment and had an example of the application. Brad Blackett, 457 Relection Road, referenced the zoning chapter 155.347 about natural features and that ponding will not have an adverse effect on the site. He said the golf course has natural vegetation. He said putting in surface parking, etc. will have an impact and that adding more runoff will add more problems. He said infiltration of rain water into a site has a calculation. More frequency of heavy rains causes water flushing straight through into the lake. He is looking to the Planning Commission and staff for what impact impervious surface has on Alimagnet Lake and how to accommodate the runoff water during the changing climate, additional rainfalls and the five- year floods. Mike Lotzer, 13826 Holyoke Lane, said if he owned the land he would be tempted to sell the land for residential property because it would be a good return on investment on the land he worked on for many years. He does not blame the owner for doing what he is doing. He does not blame any th of the people in attendance for voicing concerns. He said it is hard to get out onto 140 Street from the neighborhood across from the golf course. He added this is a unique space and that the business owner is within his rights to do what he is doing but he would like to keep this site special because urban sprawl is ugly and he would probably move. Patrick Luke, 13647 Holyoke Lane, stated that if an owner wants to sell his land he has a right. He said he has water already and why alter to get more. His sub-pump runs all the time. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes June 19, 2019 Page 5 of 11 Jennifer Deviley, 14105 Gardenview Ct, said there are water issues. She loves her community and Apple Valley and does not think the City needs that apartment building. She has a passion about keeping the green space. If the apartment building comes in she would move. Mary Mittelstaedt, 7797 Whitney Dr, said there are apartments across from where she lives and those apartments did not all get filled yet. She thinks the City should buy the golf course land from the property owner and build a community park on the west side of town and make a wildlife area to bring back the bees. Ryan Tauer, 13576 Hollins Ct, referenced a Supreme Court decision of Mendota Heights vs Mendota Golf LLC from January 2006 which had comp plan concerns in that city where Mendota Heights did not have a clear view to amend its comprehensive plan. He believes in keeping the green space. th Betty Salisbury, 8793 – 135 Street W, feels the City is losing green space. She has attended Music in the Park at Kelley Park and had always enjoyed it there and does not enjoy the high density development at Kelley Park and believes it is getting to be a high density ghetto in Apple Valley. She said Kelley Park is not Kelley Park anymore. She would like this spot owned by the City and remain as green space. th Kristin Fyanzoni, 8624 – 144 Street W, referenced Minnesota Statute that there is no justified basis in rezoning this land from the City’s current Comprehensive Plan. Apple Valley is in the same status it has been in for years. The neighborhood was well established for years. She said this change does not promote health and welfare. These families cannot afford $400,000 homes. She thinks the land should be re-purposed for a Kelley Park on this side of Apple Valley. Kathy Osgood 15601 Foliage Avenue, agreed with other people to make this land a Kelley Park West and asked if we could just not recreate and keep it a beautiful space. th Tim Thurnbald, 8435 – 135 Street W, said it is very important to maintain green space. Wetland and buffer zones cannot have housing on them so use those sections as parklands. At least have the City consider that idea. People value green space and feel betrayed when green spaces lost out. Ground water could be left natural. He believes in preserving the environment for birds and other animals in the area. You never see a natural area turn back later. This is the one and only opportunity to make the right decision and keep the green space. Marilyn Gackenheimer, 13655 Hershey Ct, said she has had many friends comment to her how beautiful this city is. She would hate to see the green space go because once it is gone, we do not get it back. She said we do not need a concrete jungle in this area and the high traffic and feels the high pack is not for her neighborhood. rd Stacey Klein, 8655 – 143 Street Ct, said she wanted to be a voice for schools on the west side. She said we need things to entice young families to move to the west side of Apple Valley. She said Apple Valley High School is at its lowest enrollment in history since the school opened. It’s a good school but we do not have a shiny new development going up over here like they do on the east side CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes June 19, 2019 Page 6 of 11 that is filling up Rosemount and Eastview. She believes a green space is going to entice younger families to move here, like if there is a park there or a section of it was a dog park to let our dogs run. Mary Berg, 13362 Hughes Ct, quoted an artist – Big Yellow Taxi – song by Counting Crows. “No, no no. Don’t it always seem to go. That you don’t know what you got till it gone. They paved paradise and put up a parking lot”. th John Boesen, 4950 Upper 148 Ct, said he has been listening to all the reasons why we should not make this other than low density housing. He said we have heard about green space, a pipeline running through it, how to do density housing and water runoff. He said there is no reason why this should be changed to a high density area other than money. He said if this is not about money there is no reason to put this into anything other than low density and this would give the land owner the ability to at least change his property, maybe a profit or maybe a break even. Chair Melander closed the public hearing at 8:36 p.m. 5. LAND USE/ACTION ITEMS A. Jardin (har-DEEN) Academy Daycare/Jardin Addition – PC19-08-SCBF Planner Kathy Bodmer stated the petitioners, Frauenshuh Commercial Real Estate, and the property owner, Kilber Investments, LLC, request consideration of actions that would allow them to split the 1.86-acre parcel at 14605 Glazier Ave to create a new lot for a two-story daycare building. The land use actions requested include a subdivision by preliminary plat to split the lot, conditional use permit (CUP) for a daycare facility in the "LB" (Limited Business) zone, and site plan review/ building permit authorization to construct a 12,200 sq. ft. daycare facility. The public hearing for the Jardin Academy Daycare was held on May 15, 2019. Revised plans were received to address any issues raised at the public hearing. The property is currently zoned "LB" (Limited Business) which lists a daycare facility as a conditional use in the zoning district. The petitioners would like to establish an outdoor play area on the west side of the building which will place the building between the play area and the properties to the east and should help to act as a screen. A subdivision by preliminary plat is requested to subdivide the existing 1.86-acre parcel, legally described at Lot 1, Block 1, BIEWALD FIRST ADDITION, into two lots. The existing office building and parking lot will be located on Lot 1 on the north side of the lot, and the new lot, Lot 2, will be the location of the new daycare site on the south side of the lot. The site plan shows that the Jardin Academy building will be located on the west side of the site with the parking lot to the east. She reviewed the parking requirements and said two outdoor play areas are shown on the west side of the building between the building and Cedar Ave. The play area is proposed to be secured with a prefinished metal "picket" type fence. City Engineer Brandon Anderson said the traffic signals on Cedar Avenue will get longer. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes June 19, 2019 Page 7 of 11 Commissioner Scanlan asked about the parking lot and the way the building is set up by the sidewalk and if it would be better to shift the handicapped to the south for dropping off and picking up. Ms. Bodmer said they are little kids and the parents go inside the building with them. MOTION: Commissioner Burke moved, seconded by Commissioner Diekmann recommending approval of the Subdivision by Preliminary Plat of Jardin Addition, subject to compliance with all City Code requirements and the following conditions: 1. Sidewalk shall be installed along Glazier Ave as it abuts the property in accordance with Subdivision Code Sect. 153.52 and the City design requirements. 2. A cash-in-lieu of land park dedication shall be required for Lot 2 based on the number of employees expected on this site, in accordance with Sect. 153.29. 3. Drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated as depicted on the preliminary plat. 4. A proof-of-parking agreement shall be executed between Lots 1 and 2 and the City to allow for overflow parking between the two lots to prevent on-street parking. Ayes - 7 - Nays - 0. MOTION: Commissioner Burke moved, seconded by Commissioner Diekmann recommending approval of Conditional Use Permit for a Daycare Facility in LB Zone, in compliance with all City Code requirements and the following conditions: 1. Hours of operation of the daycare shall be limited to 6:30 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. 2. Fencing surrounding the outdoor play area shall consist of a picket-style maintenance-free fence. Ayes - 7 - Nays - 0. MOTION: Commissioner Burke moved, seconded by Commissioner Diekmann recommending approval of Site Plan Review/Building Permit Authorization for construction of 12,200 sq. ft. two-story Daycare Facility: 1. A Natural Resources Management Permit will be required for any land disturbing activities including tree removal. 2. Trees indicated to be saved during construction shall be protected with tree protective fencing which shall be indicated on the demolition plan, site plan and grading plan. 3. A nursery bid list shall be provided that confirms that the value of the landscape plantings meet or exceed 2.5% of the value of construction of the building based on Means Construction Data. 4. Lot 2 shall be screened from the property to the south with a 6' high maintenance-free fence and from the properties to the east with a minimum of 36" tall shrubs along the east property line. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes June 19, 2019 Page 8 of 11 5. Rooftop mechanical units shall be shown on building elevation drawings to review at the time of building permit application. 6. A revised lighting plan shall be submitted at the time of application of the building permit that complies with Zoning Code Sect. 155.353. 7. The grading plan, utility plan, and erosion control plans shall be revised in accordance with the City Engineer's memo dated June 14, 2019. 8. The site plan shall be revised to address the building egress issue identified by the Fire Marshal. Ayes - 7 - Nays - 0. B. Cider Ridge Marketplace/Hope Alliance 2nd Addition – PC19-05-PZSCB Planner Kathy Bodmer stated the applicant wishes to subdivide a 35,910 sq. ft. parcel from the 7.2- acre Hope Church property to construct a 7,130 sq. ft. multi-tenant building along Cedar Avenue. The building would be located on the west side of the Hope Church property at 7477 - 145th Street West. The petitioner is requesting consideration of the following actions: 1. Comprehensive Plan Amendment from "INS" (Institutional) to "C" (Commercial). 2. Rezoning from "P" (Institutional) to "PD" (Planned Development). 3. Subdivision by Preliminary Plat to subdivide the existing 7.2 -acre lot to create a 35,910 sq. ft. (0.8-acre) lot for commercial development. 4. Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for bank teller drive-thru operation. 5. Site Plan Review/Building Permit Authorization for construction of a 7,130 sq. ft. multi- tenant building. She said the public hearing was held on May 1, 2019. Following that meeting, the petitioner made several changes to the project design to address the concerns that were raised at the meeting. Residential properties abut the Hope Church property on the north and east sides of the property. On the south, the property abuts 145th Street W. and south of that is the Dalseth Dental Clinic. The west side of the property is bounded by Cedar Avenue. A large 75' wide pipeline easement bisects the property at an angle and restricts development and redevelopment of the property. An amendment to the Comprehensive Plan designation is needed to develop the subject parcel (Lot 2) for limited business uses. The petitioner seeks to re-designate the newly created parcel from "INS" (Institutional) to "C" (Commercial) uses. When the City reviews a request for a comp plan amendment, it has the most discretion to decide whether a requested plan amendment is consistent with Apple Valley's vision for the City and for the neighborhood area. The Comprehensive Plan guidance for redevelopment and infill development includes supporting development projects that provides a "sense of place," ensuring site design preserves the vitality and cohesiveness of existing nearby residential neighborhoods and considering uses that provide a transition between residential neighborhoods and the retail commercial Downtown of the City. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes June 19, 2019 Page 9 of 11 The petitioner requests a rezoning of the newly created lot (Lot 2) from "P" (Institutional) to "PD" (Planned Development). A PD zoning is requested to provide a mix of limited business (office) and neighborhood retail uses. A PD is also requested to provide relief (or a waiver) from some of the setback and coverage requirements of a typical zoning designation. City staff is concerned that retail activity may be too intense for the neighborhood and would prefer to structure the PD to have a limited business underlying zoning designation with neighborhood service uses, but no retail. A conditional use permit is requested for the bank drive-thru lane on the north side of the building. With the redrawn property line, the drive-thru lane is now contained within the lot that it is serving. Additional landscaping is needed along the west and north sides of the drive-thru lane to screen headlights from Cedar Ave and the residential neighborhood to the north. The drive-thru lane was also shifted outside of the drainage and utility easement. Moving the parking lot out of the easements and reconfiguring the lot to create the drive aisle has resulted in Lot 2 being six parking spaces short of the requirement. Parking requirements are met when the two sites are calculated together. Cross-access and cross-parking easements will be executed between the two lots. The dumpster that was previously shown along the north property line has been relocated to the middle of the drive-thru lane, which will help to provide visual screening and noise attenuation for the properties to the north. She said the City Engineer reviewed the plans and he noted that the revised plans show that an in- ground system will be used for stormwater management. The City Engineer also reviewed traffic generation on the site and within the neighborhood area. Discussion followed. MOTION: Commissioner Diekmann moved, seconded by Commissioner Alwin recommending approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment redesignating Lot 2 from "INST" (Institutional) to "C" (Commercial). Ayes - 7 - Nays - 0. MOTION: Commissioner Diekmann moved, seconded by Commissioner Alwin recommending approval of a rezoning of Lot 2 from "P" (Institutional) to "PD" (Planned Development) subject to approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and execution of a Planned Development Agreement, with conditions as stated in the draft PD Ordinance. Ayes - 7 - Nays - 0. MOTION: Commissioner Diekmann moved, seconded by Commissioner Alwin recommending approval of the Subdivision by Preliminary Plat of Hope Alliance 2nd Addition subject to compliance with all City Codes and the following conditions: 1. Approval of the Preliminary Plat is subject to approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning and Planned Development Agreement. 2. A cash-in-lieu of land parkland dedication shall be required for Lot 2 based on the number of employees expected in accordance with the formula set forth in Subdivision Code Sect. 153.29. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes June 19, 2019 Page 10 of 11 3. The owner shall provide evidence of cross-parking, cross-access and cross- maintenance agreements between Lots 1 and 2. 4. Drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated in accordance with Subdivision Code Sect. 153.53. Ayes - 7 - Nays - 0. MOTION: Commissioner Diekmann moved, seconded by Commissioner Alwin recommending approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for Bank Drive-Thru Teller Operation, subject to the following conditions: 1. Approval of the Conditional Use Permit is subject to approval of the comprehensive plan amendment, rezoning, planned development agreement, preliminary plat and site plan review/building permit authorization. 2. The drive-thru teller hours of operation shall be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Ayes - 7 - Nays - 0. MOTION: Commissioner Diekmann moved, seconded by Commissioner Alwin recommending approval of Site Plan Review/Building Permit Authorization for construction of a 7,130 sq. ft. multiple-tenant office building, subject to the following: 1. A Natural Resources Management Permit (NRMP) shall be obtained prior to any tree removal or land disturbing activities. 2. The owner shall provide evidence of an encroachment agreement with the pipeline company to conduct land-disturbing activities within the pipeline easement prior to approval of the NRMP. 3. A nursery bid list shall be submitted which confirms that the value of the landscape plantings meet or exceed 2.5% of the value of construction of the building based on Means Construction Data. Credit may be given for preserving existing mature trees in accordance with Sect. 155.349(B). 4. Tree indicated on the plans to be saved shall be protected by protective fencing. Tree protective fencing shall be installed prior to issuance of the NRMP. 5. Cross-section drawings shall be submitted at time of building permit to confirm all rooftop mechanical units are screened in accordance with Sect 155.346. 6. A construction staging plan shall be submitted that confirms the construction limits that will be established to separate construction activities and equipment from church staff and parishioners. 7. Plans shall be revised to address the City Engineer's June 14, 2019, memo. 8. Sidewalk shall be added to the south side of the building or alternate egress access from the southwest corner of the building as approved by the Fire Marshal. Ayes - 7 - Nays - 0. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes June 19, 2019 Page 11 of 11 6. OTHER BUSINESS A. Review of upcoming schedule and other updates. City Planner Tom Lovelace stated that the next regular Planning Commission meeting would take place Wednesday, July 17, 2019, at 7:00 p.m. 7, ADJOURNMENT Hearing no further comments from the Planning Staff or Planning Commission, Chair Melander asked for a motion to adjourn. MOTION: Commissioner Schlinder moved, seconded by Commissioner Burke to adjourn the meeting at 9:25 p.m. Ayes - 7 - Nays - 0. Respectfully Submitted, 64.4- Joi Murphy. Planning LYepart 'nt Assistant Approved y the pple Valley Planning Commission on 7 / 7 9 Burke,flice-Chair