Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
07/23/2020 Meeting
:.L ••••• Meeting Location: Municipal Center Apple 7100 147th Street West Valley Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124 July 23, 2020 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING TENTATIVE AGENDA 7:00 PM 1. Call to Order and Pledge 2. Approve Agenda 3. Audience - 10 Minutes Total Time Limit - For Items NOT on this Agenda 4. Approve Consent Agenda Items Consent Agenda Items are considered routine and will be enacted with a single motion, without discussion, unless a councilmember or citizen requests to have any item separately considered. It will then be moved to the regular agenda for consideration. A. Approve Minutes of July 9, 2020, Regular Meeting B. Approve State Gambling Exempt Permit for Apple Valley Ducks Unlimited, Chapter 185, at Bogart's Entertainment Center, 14917 Garrett Avenue, on September 16, 2020 C. Adopt Resolution Setting Public Hearing, at 7:00 p.m. on August 27, 2020, for New On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor and Special License for Sunday Liquor Sales for Tavern Apple Valley, LLC, 15435 Founders Lane D. Approve Release of Natural Resources Management Permit Financial Guarantees E. Approve Release of Financial Guarantee F. Adopt Resolution Approving Plans and Specifications for Project 2020- 136, Orchard Place Utility Improvements, and Authorizing Advertisement for Receipt of Bids, on August 25, 2020, at 2:00 p.m. G. Adopt Resolution Awarding Agreement for Project 2020-102, Redwood Pond Expansion H. Approve Personnel Report I. Approve Claims and Bills 5. Regular Agenda Items A. Wellhead Protection Plan Amendment Part One Update B. Adopt Resolution Approving 2040 Comprehensive Plan C. The Shores 1. Pass Ordinance Rezoning 9.9 Acres from"SG" (Sand and Gravel) to "M-6C" (Multiple Family Residential/6-12 Units Per Acre) 2. Adopt Resolution Approving Subdivision by Preliminary Plat 3. Adopt Resolution Approving Conditional Use Permit to Allow Townhome Construction with Exposed Finish Materials Other than Provided in Section 155.346 of the City Code 4. Adopt Resolution Authorizing Conveyance of Land 5. Approve Agreement with Pulte Homes of Minnesota, LLC, for Private Installation of Public Infrastructure for Project 2018-170, The Shores 6. Staff and Council Communications 7. Approve Calendar of Upcoming Events 8. Adjourn Regular meetings are broadcast, live, on Charter Communications Cable Channel 180 and on the City's website at www.cityofapplevalley.org • ITEM: 4.A. ..... :�. Apple COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 23, 2020 Valley SECTION: Consent Agenda Description: Approve Minutes of July 9, 2020, Regular Meeting Staff Contact: Department/ Division: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk City Clerk's Office ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the minutes of the regular meeting of July 9, 2020. SUMMARY: The minutes from the last regular City Council meeting are attached for your review and approval. BACKGROUND: State statute requires the creation and preservation of meeting minutes which document the official actions and proceedings of public governing bodies. BUDGET IMPACT: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Minutes CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota July 9, 2020 Minutes of the regular meeting of the City Council of Apple Valley, Dakota County, Minnesota, held July 9, 2020, at 7:00 o'clock p.m., at Apple Valley Municipal Center. PRESENT: Mayor Hamann-Roland; Councilmembers Bergman, Goodwin, Grendahl, and Hooppaw. ABSENT: None. City staff members present were: City Administrator Lawell, City Clerk Gackstetter, City Attorney Dougherty, City Engineer Anderson, IT Manager Bang, Acting Parks and Recreation Director Endres, Assistant City Administrator Grawe, Human Resources Manager Haas, Finance Director Hedberg, City Planner Lovelace, Community Development Director Nordquist, Police Chief Rechtzigel, Fire Chief Russell, and Public Works Director Saam. Mayor Hamann-Roland called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Everyone took part in the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag. APPROVAL OF AGENDA MOTION: of Grendahl, seconded by Hooppaw,removing item 4.F -Adopt Resolution Reauthorizing Approval of 207 Sq. Ft. Variance to Increase Maximum Size of Detached Accessory Building on Lot 23, Block 1, Chateau Estates (8460 133rd Street Ct.) from the consent agenda and approving the agenda for tonight's meeting, as amended. Ayes - 5 -Nays - 0. AUDIENCE Mayor Hamann-Roland asked if anyone was present to address the Council, at this time, on any item not on this meeting's agenda. Ms. Julia Thompson, 13557 Gossamer Way, requested the Council consider expansion and various improvements to the pickleball courts and expand the hours of play Monday through Saturday from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. and on Sunday from noon to 8:00 p.m. Ms. Tara Nelson, 13935 Fleetwood Avenue, commented on food trucks, inclusion, and masks. She is trying to raise money for an inclusive playground and would like to use food trucks to help in her fund raising effort. She said she is an active community member trying to bring people together. Councilmember Goodwin responded to an email Ms. Nelson previously sent the Council regarding programming and scheduling events to build community during the pandemic. He noted the State has specifically requested cities curtail activities due to the pandemic. Councilmember Bergman offered to meet with Ms. Nelson, Councilmember Goodwin, and staff regarding food trucks. Mayor Hamann-Roland offered to meet as well. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota July 9, 2020 Page 2 CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Hamann-Roland asked if the Council or anyone in the audience wished to pull any item from the consent agenda. There were no requests. MOTION: of Bergman, seconded by Grendahl, approving all remaining items on the consent agenda with no exceptions. Ayes - 5 -Nays - 0. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS MOTION: of Bergman, seconded by Grendahl, approving the minutes of the regular meeting of June 11, 2020, as written. Ayes - 5 -Nays - 0. MOTION: of Bergman, seconded by Grendahl, approving issuance of a lawful gambling exempt permit, by the State Gambling Control Board, to BV United Soccer Club, for a revised date of July 27, 2020, at Johnny Cake Activity Center, 14255 Johnny Cake Ridge Road, and waiving any waiting period for State approval. Ayes - 5 - Nays - O. MOTION: of Bergman, seconded by Grendahl, approving receipt of the 2021 Financial Requirements of the Apple Valley Firefighters Relief Association, as attached to the Fire Chief's memo. Ayes - 5 -Nays - 0. MOTION: of Bergman, seconded by Grendahl, approving release of subdivision financial guarantees for Quarry Ponds Fourth Addition, Quarry Ponds Fifth Addition, and Apple Valley Wasatch Addition, as listed in the Community Development Department Assistant's memo. Ayes - 5 -Nays - 0. MOTION: of Bergman, seconded by Grendahl, approving wetland delineation for 13009 Diamond Path, as summarized in the complete delineation report of March 30, 2020. Ayes - 5 -Nays - 0. MOTION: of Bergman, seconded by Grendahl, approving the letter of consent from Verizon Wireless for fiber conduit installation at 5551 160th Street W., as attached to the Public Works Director's memo, and authorizing the Mayor to sign the same. Ayes - 5 -Nays - O. MOTION: of Bergman, seconded by Grendahl, adopting Resolution No. 2020-73 approving an Interim Use Permit to allow for a 76-foot tall cell tower monopole on Outlot A, Longridge Second Addition(8351 160th Street W.), with conditions as recommended by the Planning Commission. Ayes - 5 -Nays - 0. MOTION: of Bergman, seconded by Grendahl, adopting Resolution No. 2020-74 approving plans and specifications for Project 2020-117, Lebanon Cemetery Covered CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota July 9, 2020 Page 3 Ceremony Shelter, and authorizing advertising for receipt of bids, at 2:00 p.m., on July 30, 2020, via a posting on the City's website and Quest Construction Data Network. Ayes - 5 -Nays - 0. MOTION: of Bergman, seconded by Grendahl, approving the agreement for Project 2020- 101, 2020 Street and Utility Improvements, with Killmer Electric Co., Inc., in the amount of$113,484.00, and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the same. Ayes - 5 -Nays - 0. MOTION: of Bergman, seconded by Grendahl, approving the agreement for Alternative Landscape Equipment Grant with Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, in the amount of$8,789.56, and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the same. Ayes - 5 -Nays - O. MOTION: of Bergman, seconded by Grendahl, approving the agreement for Project 2019- 108, County Road 42 and Johnny Cake Ridge Road Intersection Improvements, with XCEL Energy, in the amount of$84,949.07, and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the same. Ayes - 5 -Nays - 0. MOTION: of Bergman, seconded by Grendahl, approving Change Order No. 9 to the agreement with Fendler Patterson Construction, for City Hall - Lower Level Buildout, in the amount of an additional $11,353.48. Ayes - 5 -Nays - 0. MOTION: of Bergman, seconded by Grendahl, accepting Municipal Center Second Floor Security Camera and Access Systems, as complete and authorizing final payment on the agreement with Pro-Tec Design, Inc., in the amount of$8,131.98. Ayes - 5 -Nays - O. MOTION: of Bergman, seconded by Grendahl, adopting Resolution No. 2020-75 approving the COVID-19 Preparedness Plan, as attached to the Human Resources Manager's memo. Ayes - 5 -Nays - 0. MOTION: of Bergman, seconded by Grendahl, approving the personnel actions as listed in the Personnel Report dated July 9, 2020. Ayes - 5 -Nays - 0. MOTION: of Bergman, seconded by Grendahl, to pay the claims and bills, check registers dated June 3, 2020, in the amount of$1,018,993.32; June 10, 2020, in the amount of$1,143,928.11, June 19, 2020, in the amount of$1,240,448.98, and June 24, 2020, in the amount of$1,568,142.00. Ayes - 5 -Nays - 0. END OF CONSENT AGENDA CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota July 9, 2020 Page 4 MIXED USE CAMPUS PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS Mr. Anderson reviewed the request by Rockport, LLC, for public improvements on the northwest quadrant of 157th Street W. and Pilot Knob Road. The feasibility study is required by Chapter 429. He reviewed Project 2020-134, 155th and Pilot Knob Roadway Improvements, Project 2020-135, Orchard Place Pilot Knob Turn Lane Improvements, and Project 2020-136, Orchard Place Utility Improvements, all of which are in connection with Project 2019-139 Mixed Use Campus Public Improvements, and their associated costs. Discussion followed. Mayor Hamann-Roland called the public hearing to order, at 7:41 p.m., to consider public improvements for Project 2020-134, 155th and Pilot Knob Roadway Improvements, Project 2020-135, Orchard Place Pilot Knob Turn Lane Improvements, and Project 2020-136, Orchard Place Utility Improvements, all of which are in connection with Project 2019-139, Mixed Use Campus Public Improvements. The Mayor asked for questions or comments from the Council and the public. There were none and the hearing was declared closed at 7:42 p.m. MOTION: of Goodwin, seconded by Hooppaw, adopting Resolution No. 2020-76 approving the feasibility report for 2019-139, Mixed Use Campus dated May 28, 2020. Ayes - 5-Nays - O. MOTION: of Hooppaw, seconded by Bergman, adopting Resolution No. 2020-77 directing the City Engineer to prepare plans and specifications for Project 2020-134, 155th and Pilot Knob Roadway Improvements, Project 2020-135, Orchard Place Pilot Knob Turn Lane Improvements, and Project 2020-136, Orchard Place Utility Improvements, all of which are in connection with Project 2019-139, Mixed Use Campus Public Improvements. Ayes - 5 -Nays - 0. ORCHARD PLACE Mr. Lovelace reviewed the request by HJ Development, LLP, and Rockport, LLC, for rezoning of a 35-acre parcel from"SG" (Sand and Gravel) to "RB" (Retail Business) and the subdivision of 45 acres into four lots and four outlots. The Planning Commission reviewed this item on March 25, 2020, and voted unanimously to approve. MOTION: of Bergman, seconded by Grendahl,passing Ordinance No. 1076 rezoning Lots 1-4 and Outlots D and E, Orchard Place (according to the proposed preliminary plat, dated March 24, 2020) from"SG" (Sand and Gravel) to "RB" (Retail Business". Ayes - 5 -Nays - 0. MOTION: of Grendahl, seconded by Bergman, adopting Resolution No. 2020-78 approving the preliminary subdivision of Orchard Place Addition, for 4 lots and 4 outlots, with conditions as recommended by the Planning Commission. Ayes - 5 -Nays - 0. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota July 9, 2020 Page 5 STAFF ITEMS Mayor Hamann-Roland announced the City recently received another Green Step Cities recognition. Mr. Lawell congratulated Valerie Holes and Marcie Padgett on their retirements. He then commended Melissa Haas on being selected to serve as Chair of the League of Minnesota Cities HR/Data Practices Policy Committee. Councilmember Grendahl commented on the types of inquiries the Council receives. Most recently it has been chickens, food trucks, pickleball, and fireworks. She said if these are the most serious issues the City is facing, she will take them any day. Councilmember Hooppaw relayed a message he received from a resident expressing support for the Police Department who was fearful about publicly supporting the Police. He asked the City Attorney for clarification about what would be discoverable under a data request. Mr. Dougherty said information relayed to the City is public data, but information relayed individually to a Councilmember is private unless the Councilmember makes it public. Councilmember Hooppaw said he knows of people who have been opposed to an issue but were afraid of retaliation. He suggested members of the public who want to share their opinion on an issue but don't want to share it publicly, contact Councilmembers privately so that the Council can hear all sides of the issue. CALENDAR OF UPCOMING EVENTS MOTION: of Bergman, seconded by Grendahl, approving the calendar of upcoming events as included in the Deputy City Clerk's memo, and noting that each event listed is hereby deemed a Special Meeting of the City Council. Ayes - 5 -Nays - 0. MOTION: of Grendahl, seconded by Hooppaw, to adjourn. Ayes - 5 -Nays - 0. The meeting was adjourned at 8:03 o'clock p.m. Respectfully Submitted, /s/Pamela J. Gackstetter Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk Approved by the Apple Valley City Council on Mary Hamann-Roland, Mayor • ITEM: 4.B. ..... :�. Apple COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 23, 2020 Valley SECTION: Consent Agenda Description: Approve State Gambling Exempt Permit for Apple Valley Ducks Unlimited, Chapter 185, at Bogart's Entertainment Center, 14917 Garrett Avenue, on September 16, 2020 Staff Contact: Department/ Division: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk City Clerk's Office ACTION REQUESTED: Approve issuance of a lawful gambling exempt permit, by the State Gambling Control Board, to Apple Valley Ducks Unlimited, Chapter 185, for use on September 16, 2020, at Bogart's Entertainment Center, 14917 Garrett Avenue, and waiving any waiting period for State approval. SUMMARY: Apple Valley Ducks Unlimited, Chapter 185, submitted an application for a gambling event to be held at Bogart's Entertainment Center, 14917 Garrett Avenue, on September 16, 2020. The application is on file should you wish to review it. BACKGROUND: Exempt permits to conduct lawful gambling activities, on five or fewer days in a calendar year, for qualified nonprofit organizations, are issued by the State Gambling Control Board. Issuance is subject to approval or denial by the city in which the gambling activity is to be conducted. BUDGET IMPACT: N/A • ITEM: 4.C. ..... :�. Apple COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 23, 2020 Valley SECTION: Consent Agenda Description: Adopt Resolution Setting Public Hearing, at 7:00 p.m. on August 27, 2020, for New On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor and Special License for Sunday Liquor Sales for Tavern Apple Valley, LLC, 15435 Founders Lane Staff Contact: Department/ Division: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk City Clerk's Office ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the resolution setting a public hearing, at 7:00 p.m. on August 27, 2020, on the application for a new On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor and Special License for Sunday Liquor Sales by Tavern Apple Valley, LLC, 15435 Founders Lane. SUMMARY: Tavern Apple Valley, LLC, has submitted an application for On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor and Special License for Sunday Liquor Sales for premises located at 15435 Founders Lane. Attached is a resolution authorizing and directing staff to publish a public hearing notice regarding the liquor license application. BACKGROUND: The legal description of this premises is Lot 2, Block 1, The Legacy of Apple Valley Third Addition. BUDGET IMPACT: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Resolution CITY OF APPLE VALLEY RESOLUTION NO. 2020- A RESOLUTION SETTING PUBLIC HEARING ON LICENSE APPLICATION WHEREAS, the City Clerk has advised this Council that an application for"On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor" and "Special License for Sunday Liquor Sales"has been received from Tavern Apple Valley, LLC, on premises located at 15435 Founders Lane; and WHEREAS, City Code Section 111.24 requires the City Council to set and hold a public hearing on such license applications. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Apple Valley, Dakota County, Minnesota, as follows: 1. A public hearing on said application shall be held before this Council at the time, date and place specified in the Notice of Public Hearing attached to this resolution as Exhibit A. 2. As required by the City Code, the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to publish the hearing notice attached, in a timely manner, in the official City newspaper. ADOPTED this 23rd day of July, 2020. Mary Hamann-Roland, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk Exhibit A NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON-SALE & SPECIAL SUNDAY INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION CITY OF APPLE VALLEY NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Apple Valley, Dakota County, Minnesota, will meet at the Municipal Center, 7100 147th Street W., on Thursday, August 27, 2020, at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as possible. The purpose of the meeting will be to hold a public hearing on the application of Tavern Apple Valley, LLC, for"ON-SALE INTOXICATING LIQUOR" and"SPECIAL LICENSE FOR SUNDAY LIQUOR SALES" pursuant to City Code Section 111.22. The business, which will be operated in conjunction with the proposed licenses, is a restaurant located at 15435 Founders Lane. The owners/officers of the corporation are: Timothy Randal Cary—CEO and President Peter Wesley Ahn—CFO & Treasurer Anoushiravan Azarbaydjani Ansari—Owner Gholam-Abbass Shahbazi—Owner Ali Pour Alizadeh—Owner Hadi Anbarghalami—Owner Reza Pour Aliadeh—Owner All interested parties will be given an opportunity to be heard at said time and place. DATED this 23rd day of July, 2020. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL Pamela J. Gackstetter Apple Valley City Clerk • ITEM: 4.D. ..... :�. Apple COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 23, 2020 Valley SECTION: Consent Agenda Description: Approve Release of Natural Resources Management Permit Financial Guarantees Staff Contact: Department/ Division: Keenan Hayes, Natural Resources Technician Natural Resources Division ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the release of the Natural Resources Management Permit financial guarantee for RJ Ryan and Frana Companies. SUMMARY: The following project has been inspected and is compliant according to City requirements: 1. McCormick Computer Permit No. AV075117 Amount $6,700 Reduce now to $0.00 Guarantee Type: Check 2. Zvago Apartment Complex Permit No. AV069478 Amount $7,500 Reduce now to $0.00 Guarantee Type: Check BACKGROUND: The City retains Natural Resources Management Permit (NRMP) financial securities to ensure the protection of natural resources during land disturbing activities. BUDGET IMPACT: N/A • ITEM: 4.E. ..... Apple COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 23, 2020 Valley SECTION: Consent Agenda Description: Approve Release of Financial Guarantee Staff Contact: Department/ Division: Mari Salamanca, Department Assistant Community Development Department ACTION REQUESTED: Approve release of financial guarantee. SUMMARY: The City holds numerous financial guarantees to ensure the installation of certain improvements in new developments, as well as to assure protection of natural resources. Staff review of the status of this development indicates that the following action is in order: 1. Village Pointe Plaza / Zvago Addition Cash Wire Transfer (PC 16-30-ZSB) Original Deposit on 4/26/17: $504,375.00 Reduced 2/13/20 to $210,625.00 Reduce now to $0.00 BACKGROUND: N/A BUDGET IMPACT: N/A • ••• ITEM: 4.F. ..... .... II 2020 Apple COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 23, Va ey SECTION: Consent Agenda Description: Adopt Resolution Approving Plans and Specifications for Project 2020-136, Orchard Place Utility Improvements, and Authorizing Advertisement for Receipt of Bids, on August 25, 2020, at 2:00 p.m. Staff Contact: Department/ Division: Brandon Anderson, City Engineer Public Works Department ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt resolution approving plans and specifications for Project 2020-136, 2020 Orchard Place Utility Improvements, and authorizing advertisement for receipt of bids on August 25, 2020, at 2:00 p.m. SUMMARY: Rockport, LLC, has petitioned that the undersigned's property be improved with: sanitary sewer and service stubs; water main and service stubs; storm sewer and drainage facilities; streets with concrete curb; trails and sidewalks; street lights; and traffic control (including signals) necessary to serve its property located at the NW quadrant of 157th and Pilot Knob Road for development, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and that the City assess the cost of the improvements against the undersigned's property in accordance with the approved engineer's feasibility report. Scope of work included in the Phase 1 scope of work to be bid includes Sanitary Sewer, Water Main and Storm Sewer from 157th street to just south of the Magellan easement along future 155th Street within Orchard Place. A map of the proposed project area is attached (Figure: 1). This project is tentatively scheduled to begin construction in September of 2020 with a completion by December 2020. BACKGROUND: On May 9, 2019, City Council Approved Design Agreement with Rockport, LLC, for design services of public infrastructure relating to Project 2019-139, the proposed Mixed Use Business Campus - Feasibility Study. On March 12, 2020, City Council Adopted Resolution 2020-30 Declaring Adequacy of Petition and Ordering Preparation of Feasibility Report for Project 2019-139, Mixed Business Campus Public Improvements. On April 23, 2020, City Council Approved Design Agreement with Rockport, LLC, for Project 2019-139, Mixed Business Campus Feasibility Study. On April 23, 2020, City Council Approved Design Agreement with Rockport, LLC, for Projects 2020-134, 2020-135, and 2020-136, as part of Orchard Place Public Improvements. On June 11, 2020, City Council Adopted Resolution No. 2020-70 receiving the Feasibility Report and Calling for a Public Hearing relating to Project 2019-139, Mixed Use Business Campus - Feasibility Study. On July 9, 2020, City Council adopted Resolution No. 2020-76 approving feasibility report and Resolution No. 2020-77 ordering Public Improvement Projects 2020-134, 2020-135, & 2020-136. BUDGET IMPACT: Project costs and funding are included in the approved Feasibility Study and summarized as follows: Estimated Project Costs: Construction Cost including construction contingency (15%) $ 1,484,348 Engineering Design, Contract Admin(25%) 371,087 Total Estimated Cost $ 1,855,435 Estimated Project Funding Sanitary Sewer Fund 88,981 Special Assessments 1,766,454 Total Estimated Funding $ 1,855,435 ATTACHMENTS: Map Map Resolution Exhibit .••••: "" 2019-139: Mixed Use Campus Figure 1: Location Map BOLTON Apple 11 City of Apple Valley May 2020 & MENK VallA , - - : 9 0 .., , . , _ _., 0 1500 3000 / .:ilyi1'p�►1 ri ri ♦t'i'tl-P. I�� ♦ SCALE FEET r' j NEWSI 11 M1111E.I1 tie 4 ••i.�. w►i �� ► p-'-I1'D��-�1I►�:: o�e����V�pO,iO`�� ��'�/��p::i I , Q h *::.►►1111/had1,94 4% / _A yr? - ♦J-1♦llll►ja■ �; j::@♦ice iv # 1....0 rw , O i.a /Inn►.p .9►♦♦�♦I1Ih 1i :it E III �e 1 Qlu�■AIh 16 mi g...77111 - q uty wrrl= ♦1/ /del* i ® 1�//� E-•' ■ •■ ei�; r---° ® ��,. ...n�i ►r:%:fi :; y�i000i�■ � ♦ ♦ Iip� _ ■u������� Gi 1..a l •yy r �� �j ::Anil ♦ 11► : 11 1 ���� ♦ � atJJ�\�►♦♦.� 1 � aim �• ` .:: .n■.'� Illllln�.,,� ;�rrl■ ►�*y1•% •♦_WO iO✓pi:MP •I' M�.•,;;:►: demm.A Qi a !i2L " glf nn�'�.pM� ■ 1��/1/p•I ��!�'�1 IL�� 1 1� ,/I WO/ 7' e'-I v/pnnn nmlllll ►:t `C `1 i ~ aet i•' �"-- .jH®�'� rQli �IIIII In 1-t as E rift 11;11 1; I•` :�:t��♦��II1,mit N�♦♦iksvoIII� 01, I_ ..11rq��mama Itt■tan n natty Biro -` vi `p No.. ..4 4..„„,s-•♦1!i --1 r�i j.1 �Ih1j` rI l Inmoo ■iir9611=1�lll-'470 �1:iQMilk IPe trill �'-r m►i-- II-w�■rro�4IIIs.-,�����4 , 1 nIr �,", ■ -■■ '■Ir•1���`♦• •III•ryl, � '.!► ■■ ... ■ 1 b n ®®��1� Ili .���pI`"11� � ..r►.-_► PII� i --We� '►i i ��► .i f�����`,® .III♦ �.�� 0.41 ♦ c �j►�♦ ► 717441►Q-�•4ERA"■VA : \ T a v'■ ■ mil.(2+1 :►♦♦.�0 �0�IWO ,�10♦qi♦i►:#Nt �...-.- 0 i AM Orrk.• I/ADI♦ 1♦O1I mil U�¢�•n\� ■ ,��'i •.0.,� �i► ♦ ♦ �i�i I��N.���III■■ ���I�A a ml nm .d►nm..■ di� :�iO 4 a1P n■nnIuq(4VII�tea► �� tii►i� /1 ,�i���,��►iii► `0104 m i 11 . 1 �i�'./�\I ° �■■■e: liwpw41 ---a_p !Li1arr \n■rtwig • -1�1p♦♦4:$ 1 b4 11m -ip 4/:Ur I♦ •�. .■■♦ ►-o as a .. VA !s 1 C:airt9.• A3_ p'♦► ♦♦ V. =_.II����IP♦E /V 4,, „ ♦��i� ♦i '„':; � ♦111\:iI1��•�w �; �p♦-���`- �� ur►hi►�O•• n ► , � ��-D�� ♦ p�� 11 I O♦ v♦.•1�` ;�..•�• . O. A-■'t Yea, ei.post♦,0 iV=W• 4.S :an ::�� -_ ayo,p,♦.... . �h► , Oi 7�• �. I1111 rI t ♦ ♦• ---�n i nn n ♦ ♦ ♦ � ♦♦/. Ij ��1.rr �L;1a:::Q: I,:Ifd.binn■■u 1 �i♦iv.♦rF.lrawdw�l.L�d�G►i.■�dr:u- R(�hrt�A��i�.:9 .IA�IIII�1 Ai la 'glace •��i gip .r•'��InG ����111. -� ,fin■■'P� ' ��i' ///�1111� isi .-�A ■■ �i= ■ nn :1I0`�-_��� ♦��:aii� �0 'O ♦1►11 i•�V♦O♦i1 �♦►►�//pA•:,♦ "A �,-n �►11 ♦1:24 a GD4 1-� c,■►♦ ♦ •►iiii►Ii■ - L16 O♦♦•�.�� Oi1j1::: /0.■III 44 m..ter'.411‘ �♦►■ `'1 � I gas:' ra nmm�n ce. cc il C ♦im■■u■D��. Iiunm► ►11�� r .:: ► IiCOMn .■�� .,�.9 =:.- III �II � V mm�♦► LRj / Inlrryi♦�j nlll���i bpin rCCFF• t\a •4.1:j 1 :g� '.�11111111111111 `�gili"4 c ►p♦,. Lh*'6llulli 71 v/ ► 7A :•,al::• �`� 1 � -®-n- mu- c �„'1\vG=..,21::m■. 11111111,.ei .04 I'r i► .nni �I► n ►a nrp_nmi �,M 'r ,mL■n.. p�13/u� it:�inn1►\'An111h.�innnll� r m f( n TF:� In.r::u ♦1 '` ♦�,iuuiumui/�n1P, Irpn AI�■ � ,;.,„��,`"O1� G� G is�- a I---.1% \11r:1: Itol',1 )J��nan �� ....,%•- AI III, 1111.111111 IIM *1-12"1,;fu: _ ^III .712 IVIIMPIIPM .i•�..I ( rim � u .® m .I.Irr i r 1 ��rnlmlC� ?F UNE■i■. . _ KIWI. /r�o -m •VillIBIAVNe4tit AI - - manna,• SS is: hStreet ] • .� lit�Lii _rr-_ n.........m il�P .: N � I HIIIIIIII ............... r,71i —Mir ;'� I III J - e1� 1 , 3Yp`��`iilii: ■i.►�I4i.♦�p. n • a ill l c' uan'I=. N e►1 ti _ in ,. s,,,�,,,,,,, 0= ■ il=iH PROJECT AREA == - • 1■♦ WV p♦$♦.Op O,z♦an �l� 7�;� _ -mA�• .J DOIL ip o ♦�iu-NE D► pp Op 4.nn ®n • ► � -. a- .P-�P ♦p.V♦♦p♦pam.� olli�i�`ItI IIIIII�JJJJJ����`����`����`����`����`����`����`����IIIIIIII n�Iln■'. mmi►�♦♦i1o■i I ► 1� .1►O i�.it♦♦9■ v piil O•+. d.♦iC. N nm�Iin I ■ c n 1 ♦♦4 :i•O•d i�1 min _ ® ,, „, • .lEg_ � _ , a ;o =ti .: U �L►�� ♦ ii� * S•nnn. a'p: : r I — Iti-=umLmArII �: un, e ••• •••• ••••• •••• ••• • 2019-139: Mixed Use Campus Figure 2: Proposed Phasing BOLTON Apple City of Apple Valley May 2020 & MENK Valley -F 1 1 150th Street (CSAH 42) ir II IIIHIIIIIHI r---- — , 1 h J C - -1 I i - - - / 010350002010 I 1 - I i I rI — - 1 - \ 1 1 1 —L —p— IF ( ' a' ' a' '1 I T li N. n - - - - _ 52nd S 1 u A . 1 i�r--� 7 II II 010350003011 1 - - 1 I II - - �_ - _1 153rd Street 1 = - - J ! , L 1 I ■ • 2020-13 : IIII L II — •R CE PILO • NO tAls,A A '7ROVE NTdi/ 7 I I I�� ! fr 1 155th Streelt l l l l l I 1--k-v 1 [ /1 ii_ / i ,I=Imor, II a .� _ _ - - - _ IIII IIIIIIIII \ IIII PHASEI '*� I ( III( ",_ u, 1 - 1 ,.... - - PHASE ! III d ;; „ \,),- CITY PROJECT 2020-136: CITY PROJECT 20'0 E A 1 ORCHARD PLACE 1 I-_ LEGEND ,; till 155TH AND ILO K •B�MN LJUTILITY IMPROVEMENTS 1 1 ROADWAY IiVt' ' • m = _ PHASE 1 WORK AREA 1 I ' ®® TAW (CITY PROJECT 2020-136) I__, ?- ®� �� _ J L e® pr PHASE 2 WORK AREA 1- . ��] , 010350075014 �� PHASE 2 METE � �� _ (CITY PROJECTS 2020 134&2020 135) ® L_J CITY PR J ECT 20 i 35:\\ �• • G G, ��' `-- I d �� I" I 7 ,i J ORCHAR PLACE •ITT K , _ _ - i = _ H', 4 — B� ��I ,� imer C-� TURN to P QVE11�1\N �• 1 nn.. �� K ��[i3� �B — - F 15 th tree I / 'IIIII2�� I I - v -r i m I l a� -I � - -7 \ ) 1 '5' mil pg§' % 1 ES /IZZ7OCCO -c 1 3 bcr,',<<\ M r - *,, \-\--\\>>2%-- - - - -or Uj 1 114 - m_ - _ - IIIIIII 1 1 J — i �► �� oc uj PHASE 2 ,t 11 2 - CITY PROJECT 2020-1354 I I ORCHARD PLACE PILOT N•�'� 1 160th t o ( H 46� , ) I a - - \ - - a L _ TURN LANE IMPROVE111 --SCALE F ET Q 2 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY RESOLUTION NO. 2020- A RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND DIRECTING RECEIPT OF SEALED BIDS FOR PROJECT 2020-136, ORCHARD PLACE UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, the Apple Valley City Council has reviewed plans and specifications for Project 2020-136, Orchard Place Utility Improvements; and WHEREAS, the City Council believes that the interests of the City would be best served by receiving sealed bids based on said plans and specifications. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Apple Valley, Dakota County, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Such plans and specifications for Project 2020-136, 2020 Orchard Place Utility Improvements, a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and made a part hereof, are hereby approved. 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized to receive sealed bids for Project 2020-136, Orchard Place Utility Improvements, at the time and place specified in the form of notice attached hereto as Exhibit A. 3. The City Clerk is further authorized and directed to cause an advertisement for said bids to be posted on the City's website, in the City's official newspaper, and on the online Quest Construction Data Network, not less than 3 weeks prior to the opening of said bids. ADOPTED this 23rd day of July 2020. Mary Hamann-Roland, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk SECTION 00 11 13 ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS Bids will be received electronically online only by the City of Apple Valley, Minnesota, through Quest CDN, until 2:00 P.M., CDT, Tuesday, August 25, at which time they will be reviewed for the furnishing of all labor, materials, and all else necessary for the following: City Project 2020-136, ORCHARD PLACE UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS 8 EA Sanitary Sewer Structure 1,950 LF PVC Sanitary Sewer 1,800 LF DIP Watermain 13 EA Storm Sewer Structure 2,000 LF Storm Sewer Pipe 5 AC Erosion Control With related items Digital copies of the Contract Documents can be obtained at www.questcdn.com. The Quest CDN project number is 7210689. Bidders can download the Contract documents for $20 by searching for the project on Quest CDN website's Project Search page. Instructions for online bidding are attached. Please contact QuestCDN.com, prior to bidding, at (952) 233-1632 for assistance with free membership registration, downloading, and submitting bids. For electronic bids, electronic bid bonds will also be accepted through Surety 2000 using contract #7210689. The bid bonds must be payable to the City of Apple Valley in the amount of five percent (5%) of the amount of bid, to be forfeited as liquidated damages in the event that the bid is accepted and the bidder shall fail to promptly enter into a written contract and furnish the required bond. Direct inquiries to Engineer's Project Manager Brandon Anderson at (952) 953-2490. No bidder questions will be addressed after 4:00 P.M. on Friday, August 21, 2020. Bid Security in the amount of 5 percent of the amount of the Bid must submitted through Surety 2000 and accompany each Bid in accordance with the Instructions to Bidders. The Owner reserves the right to retain the deposits of the 3 lowest Bidders for a period not to exceed 60 days after the date and time set for the Opening of Bids. No Bids may be withdrawn for a period of 30 days after the date and time set for the Opening of Bids. The Owner reserves the right to reject any and all Bids, to waive irregularities and informalities therein, and further reserves the right to award the Contract to the best interests of the Owner. Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk City of Apple Valley, Minnesota CITY OF APPLE VALLEY I PROJECT MANUAL ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS 2020-136 00 11 13 • ••• ITEM: 4.G. ..... .... 2020 Apple,. COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 23, Va ey SECTION: Consent Agenda Description: Adopt Resolution Awarding Agreement for Project 2020-102, Redwood Pond Expansion Staff Contact: Department/ Division: Brandon Anderson, City Engineer Public Works Department ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt resolution awarding agreement for Project 2020-102, Redwood Pond Expansion, to Rachel Contracting, LLC, in the amount of$414,294.30. SUMMARY: On July 7, 2020, fourteen (14) bids were received for the 2020 Redwood Pond Expansion project as described within the attached bid tabulation. Base Bids ranged from $414,294.30 to $674,488.90. Rachel Contracting, LLC submitted the low bid in the amount of $414,294.30. The low bid was $82,158.70 under the Engineers estimate of$496,453.00. The City of Apple Valley 2020-102 Capital Improvement Program identifies Stormwater Improvements at the following location: • Redwood Pond Expansion Scope of work includes the expansion of KL-P1, Redwood Pond, located north of the intersection of Redwood Drive and 150th Street West. This project also includes modification to the existing outlet, realignment of the existing trail as well as removal and redesign of existing park features impacted by pond modifications. A map of the proposed project location is attached (Figure: 1). The expansion of KL-P1 was one of several projects recommended in the Keller Lake Subwatershed Assessment Report, by Barr Engineering Co. in 2017. The expansion and storm water modifications will increase the water quality treatment volume for a contributing watershed of approximately 170 acres. Staff expanded upon the findings of the subwatershed assessment and completed a feasibility study to identify the most cost effective method to achieve water quality treatment volumes. A Feasibility Study, completed by Barr Engineering Company, dated March 27, 2020, evaluated three alternatives for expanding Redwood Pond to increase water quality to Keller Lake. In the Study, Alternative 2 is the preferred option for meeting the goals of improving water quality to Keller Lake. In 2019, Braun Intertec took sediments samples within the north side of the pond. These samples showed high levels of carcinogenic PAHs within two of the sample locations. This sediment will require disposal at a landfill that is permitted to accept this waste. On December 19, 2019, Public Works staff held a neighborhood meeting to discuss stormwater improvements to Redwood Pond. The overall response from residents was positive and well received. There were some concerns raised about tree removal. Staff communicated that these concerns would be balanced in the final design with the additional water quality benefits to the pond and Keller Lake as a whole. This project is scheduled for construction in late summer/early fall of 2020 until spring of 2021 due to available grant funds from the Clean Water Act (BWSR) and to allow winter construction. The City of Apple Valley also received grant funds for improvements to Erickson Pond, but will delay that project until 2021 to balance available stormwater funds in 2020. A standard City agreement will be utilized for this project. BACKGROUND: In 2015, excess sediment near the northeast inlet to Redwood Pond was removed by City staff. On March 14, 2019, the City Council approved a Grant Agreement with the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources for Metro Based Funding towards the expansion and improvement of Redwood Pond On July 25, 2019 the City Council adopted Resolution Number 2019-86 directing the preparation of plans and specifications for Project 2020-102, Redwood Pond Expansion. On June 11, 2020, City Council adopted Resolution 2020-71, approving plans and specifications and directing receipt of sealed bids for Project 2020-102, Redwood Pond Expansion. BUDGET IMPACT: Project costs and funding included in the adopted 2020 operating budget are summarized as follows: Estimated Project Costs: Estimated Costs Awarded Costs Construction Cost $496,453.00 $414,294.14 Construction Contingency 9,547.00 91,705.86 Engineering, Construction Admin. & 115,000.00 115,000.00 Contingency Total Estimated Cost $ 621,000.00 $ 621,000.00 Estimated Project Funding: Clean Water Fund Grant BWSR S 114,890.00 $ 114,890.00 Storm Sewer Utility 506,110.00 506,110.00 Total Estimated Funding $ 621,000.00 $ 621,000.00 ATTACHMENTS: Map Resolution Exhibit / 1ssp P4 5P�C-O an. 1�1 i,..ipAiii I iiir irotIon. 0 Irt III f AFF —am , � Q vc fva. ` 1111111111111 I�i 'MI CI ii . ► n:�AIVIEMPtcfal il� I I. li =liiiii11114,61/1 nl:'ai,, r; 'a♦dlli�l�il 414�� I • ►�■ �-,� ` -.p.m,.ri Iry m i =i C li ■��\ _ _. r a' i. 'bir ri11r O■ _ � ► �y r l��9• �fII11►7 ►�A �i�v � ♦ �G:� -1119��.LL �■ Inn■. %' i .•.eir■■. GP /♦� ig7. 01.6 : AII1Y1♦1'�Cx :S•'�l � nnimA �a� �\�nnnl//�: �_ •� �� 1 Q�II♦� •�,firiD O..iA.O g®r _ 1:.� i :�a■�n.;11" � to ►•� �III er � nnoL• 1■IIP'tng nnnnn ly •nn• 11/.�t� 111�� __ 1, 4.��v �.. ■:�r rip IIIII111111(1111� 1,1�i4.adQ 1.11�rNjmpg. I I - Ft .41� gem �:._ /�I���C i a nn....vs .P I�����.•♦��� �� , �•� vr IIIII 1 ,,,,,,, n nI Sri \••C1: 1 0. :`•.A 7llibl AUK= -� - ��/11���♦� s,,�,. ig �` �hZ9��I�\�1III��..�1�re N I.99A `� 1. �•♦' � \.�� nm•�i\O�u...�ri� �1 %,'�������Pe■�r�'� `� 11 , ,,,,--Ann Iln 1, •.._ i, m F m. I 1 nmommomma 11:= Pei%m ® 1141 ►►�Ea' .■.wl gnMlrlr.ln.pp 11111 11■,� 1 .2►.Cu•� �.or P .iC 4 ■ ■■11■g4 _■■1 �, �;►4g.. sa a.: I.,a•4..'• �l ����:% 'S5r : �a��: Aii..■ (l1InP��� � or-i p �'0i1:" ..�i.• :r►%Ii.rl■r■■■.►' ♦ y.'► m �b :♦ •rryry � a■ 9 �► aI .... w. >� 1. ♦.► an..aI nu. ,T..d►nnm■■■dl. •It gG� ►_#: m1 ........................`•ir_ 1i4, iii , �� �.i.lr __tdep l/harm V Sri .♦1/.mom v=: . on .. �..`�:•I � _ a. •n � 44 �: 111\.it\��.� � _ • 1 ►�'1♦. n 1` � 11i i� .9 -= .In n.�a•• i� F O ■� r1 •1 y1iu% :,• 41\11- a ♦• Ii``� 1 -%•m . . �°�'i_= ■... 1A� C naq:►nn . llrnnmr •11 1;, v ,,�G.R'4Z: •� �iii'�:: A ��a• Li a__ �.u. �♦��7 ►V.r �ITn� of� 6 a:::1:■mI ■1 n..■.91■1 a.yd...•14191aAGa'i•.�Oi== i.�din GiaG�■�i.1 ! IIIII\ \\l/♦�tr. Ilim -..a iiii pal 11 Ir ill • - �..■ � III ►a �1 v//11111�i�vi"' �V i �.�•- ,.�•'a'��m�r/ii9��1$'■14►4ii� ri■ ♦•: ■�; glfi :. ■W 411rnnr ♦.ry rIfii.ii■711`�• I�I n►N►:,1♦ r. mmn:ia■. . .• .i.n�q 1 i� I I P:C� IIP. :��QLy ��_�: F�7�5.�, i/Ij�i/1 111 P nnnl►....On C. iti rllr4'41WI •r v r III ••.. ► �.I� Cd •Ir •...� 1- nnnOOO`■ �q iiiir :... mi 1114111arl __ ._`.. �i1 ..�Z��..• � ... .drr�1/� n•�•%. �� ""�/uilmnti.'.� nm.�i♦�"i7® •qh �:� 11111111111111 ♦rn0° y �� nQ.d` Cl S�n�i® ll r i.. �®t 11: ♦inn'- tin. n �`d n0:: 1 GIia''_ 6n nn. I I mGv4Z..�,:�; �/mLI-6 11/Il'hiit% nnnm, .d � re ,:`_ �`■dn. ►ard � �iiu1iu111iui • nu nn �■ BM ®� ;noon n ► ��111111/I1 lir•S �iiip� .� .nlll U■nn..........i♦111 m1 f;_ .- ,m r_ "rie v:L_ W �g�q ,P a HHPh �>, = e.Ta __ 4. •� .nr■.: .� �.►, n ._ .a/1w111■�■ -=1� .--.1%<*- D.P. 'ISnn• Pmu�Bp o illTiuir (trco umiiD♦aur... ■.n11.. riILu, 1�11t♦- ► s.un nn . k rn rn P m rr.■..1. a r rr �IIai u I. AEI II IH I 1■ 1 •• ■ . r111...po �..,_.1 l Iq non ......................• 1 �_ ■ i' 11°'nn' rr�s,4o�o� +H l l l l l l ormm ■_,1MEM E I L� �, ♦ g444id ilili In 'mini OClrr, •=r�lq •' �`' �♦rin n n■ ■o ♦♦♦.4 a 'n` Buell a . ._e. nrA- ,1♦ ...• ► p /ui r: —•n♦♦ ♦♦p.�.♦♦nn _ .o :mq�. O♦♦O.......... ♦'�IQI ♦ a'n• ♦ti44i4iGi♦ml®a®.e® c=,.ate . : . e. $ � 10444.4..111,®..®®®® ��1■ a 1�1i�� 1= e -��. 11,1,1'04%� � Amy 1 1 n n 1 nano♦ • MA�1 - ��1�.% • A■�■�nn►� 1I I I I I I I I I iI I II rii r&i r�r-'I •rnmlpq 4►IIIn11111I c.r5'i 1 :I I _.111r 1._,19 _ ann►� i 1L� �_ 'L.'�'i °.....� Bnm• ' > = _Mi '!'' i' EIi ♦or,,, r _iB ■- �N Q/Q ::mne I ■Ia1i:i.C1►��♦ 'qC :a■ �! IIIII 9 ,, IJ ���,- �.r� . ♦�.nn nr � i):. 1l�4 VI.11■rO"►;1♦♦�; ,�I �y'.� n;/I/1 do_ e _ f� 1n1.\_. .Pmlt r1111■b .-1:.En 11 �iiii nrq. _ Ai N N♦ki :,',::;;:: I :; 1 it - • Ill �nl■Il taM lr//bir K. _,... f:�l==n•-_ 1..tN- i 1160th Street(Co. Rd 46) 0 1500 3000 SCALE FEET 2020-102 REDWOOD POND EXPANSION •••• •••• ••• • City of Apple Valley Apple il Figure 1 Valley CITY OF APPLE VALLEY RESOLUTION NO. 2020- A RESOLUTION AWARDING AGREEMENT FOR PROJECT 2020-102 2020 REDWOOD POND EXPANSION WHEREAS,pursuant to an advertisement for bids for improvements identified as Project 2020-102, 2020 Redwood Pond Expansion,bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: (Tabulation attached as Exhibit A), and; WHEREAS, it appears Rachel Contracting, LLC is the lowest responsible bidder. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Apple Valley, Dakota County, Minnesota: 1. That the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with Rachel Contracting, LLC for its base bid in the amount of$414,294.30 for the completion of Project 2020-102 according to the plans and specifications heretofore approved by the Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed. ADOPTED this 23rd day of July, 2020. Mary Hamann-Roland, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk Project Name: REDWOOD POND EXPANSION I hereby certify that this is on exact City Project No.:2020-102 reproduction of bids received. Bid Opening:Juesday,July 7,2020,at 10:00 A.M..C.S.T.-ELECTRONIC Owner: City of Apple Valley Brandon Anderson, P.E. ♦W:. "' Registration No.43332 Apple Engineer Estimate Rachel Contracting,LLC G.F.Jedlicki,Inc Dryden Excavating Sunram Construction,Inc. Section Title Item Code Item Description UofM Quantity Unit Price Extension Unit Price Extension Unit Price Extension Unit Price Extension Unit Price Extension Base Bid $496,453.00 $414,294.30 $428,242.80 $438,596.84 $454,713.00 1 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 1 $40,000.00 $40,000.00 $30,701.00 $30,701.00 $19,550.00 $19,550.00 $8,800.00 $8,800.00 $35,650.28 $35,650.28 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,170.00 $2,170.00 $3,850.00 $3,850.00 $4,950.00 $4,950.00 $6,200.00 $6,200.00 3 POND DEWATERING LUMP SUM 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $21,215.00 $21,215.00 $10,750.00 $10,750.00 $18,150,00 $18,150.00 $16,550.00 $16,550.00 4 STREET SWEEPER(WITH PICKUP BROOM) HOURS 15 $200.00 $3,000.00 $136.00 $2,040.00 $65.00 $975.00 $160.00 $2,400.00 $150.00 $2,250.00 5 CLEARING TREE 33 $240.00 $7,920.00 $246.85 $8,146.05 $270.00 $8,910.00 $272.00 $8,976.00 $260.00 $8,580.00 6 GRUBBING TREE 33 $145.00 $4,785.00 $166.25 $5,486.25 $180.00 $5,940.00 $181.00 $5,973.00 $175.00 $5,775.00 7 REMOVE AND REPLACE CURB AND GUTTER LIN FT 20 $10.00 $200.00 $128.00 $2,560.00 $44.00 $880.00 $60 00 $1,200.00 $75.00 $1,500.00 8 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT-STREET SQ YD 20 $5.00 $100.00 $36.30 $726.00 $4.00 $80.00 $20.00 $400.00 $10.00 $200.00 9 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT-TRAIL SQYD 892 $12.00 $10,704.00 $2.50 $2,230.00 $4.00 $3,568.00 $3.75 $3,345.00 $3.15 $2,809.80 10 MUCK EXCAVATION(EV)(P)-MANAGEMENT LEVEL 3 CU YD 860 $50.00 $43,000.00 $50.00 $43,000.00 $59.00 $50,740.00, $45.86 $39,439.60 $65.50 $56,330.00 11 COMMON EXCAVATION(EV)(P) CU YD 6455 $30.00 $193,650.00 $15.40 $99,407.00 $21.00 $135,555.00 $17.56 $113,349.80 $19.00 $122,645.00 12 REMOVE 18"RCP STORM SEWER LIN FT 112 $12.00 $1,344.00 $21.80 $2,441.60 $7.00 $784.00 $31.90 $3,572.80 $7.50 $840.00 13 REMOVE 21"RCP STORM SEWER LIN FT 64 $13.00 $832.00 $23.50 $1,504.00 $8.00 $512.00 $35.75 $2,288.00 $8.50 $544.00 14 REMOVE 30"RCP STORM SEWER LIN FT 20 $12.00 $240.00 $28.25 $565.00 $11.00 $220.00 $50.60 $1,012.00 $12.00 $240.00 15 REMOVE 54"RCP STORM SEWER LIN FT 40 $15.00 $600.00 $33.25 $1,330.00 $24.00 $960.00 $111.10 $4,444.00 $25.00 $1,000.00 16 REMOVE MANHOLE OR CATCH BASIN INCL CASTING EACH 2 $400.00 $800.00 $600.00 $1,200.00 $650.00 $1,300.00 $1,248.50 $2,497.00 $285.00 $570.00 17 REMOVE FLARED END SECTION EACH 3 $200.00 $600.00 $440.00 $1,320.00 $345.00 $1,035.00 $440.00 $1,320.00 $365.00 $1,095.00 18 18"RC PIPE SEWER CLASS V LIN FT 114 $76.00 $8,664.00 $87.20 $9,940.80 $64.00 $7,296.00 $58.58 $6,678.12 $67.25 $7,666.50 19 30"RC PIPE SEWER CLASS IV LIN FT 91 $110.00 $10,010.00 $150.45 $13,690.95 $102.00 $9,282.00 $117.70 $10,710.70 $107.00 $9,737.00 20 30" RC PIPE BEND 22.5 DEGREES EACH 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,664.00 $1,664.00 $1,900.00 $1,900.00 $2,970.00 $2,970.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 21 4'DIA.STORM MH,8'DEEP,INCL R-1642 CSTG AND HDPE ADJ RINGS EACH 1 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 $3,270.00 $3,270.00 $3,388.00 $3,388 00 $3,435.00 $3,435.00 22 S'DIA.STORM MH,8'DEEP,INCL R-1642 CSTG AND HDPE ADJ RINGS EACH 1 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $8,115.00 $8,115.00 $6,385.00 $6,385.00 $5,948.80 $5,948.80, $6,705.00 $6,705.00 23 7'DIA.STORM MH,8'DEEP,INCL R-1642 CSTG AND HDPE ADJ RINGS EACH 1 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $12,500.00 $12,500.00 $10,450.00 $10,450.00 $10,648.00 $10,648.00 $11,000.00 $11,000.00 24 5'STORM MANHOLE OVERDEPTH LIN FT 3 $400.00 $1,200.00 $460.50 $1,381.50 $400.00 $1,200.00 $478.50 $1,435.50 $420.00 $1,260.00 25 7'STORM MANHOLE OVERDEPTH LIN FT 2 $500.00 $1,000.00 $892.65 $1,785.30 $700.00 $1,400.00 $979.00 $1,958.00 $735.00 $1,470.00 26 POND OUTLET STRUCTURE EACH 1 $18,000.00 $18,000.00 $23,300.00 $23,300.00 1 $27,125.00 $27,125.00 $31,295.00 $31,295.00 $28,500.00 $28,500.00 27 SAFL BAFFLE IN 4'DIA.STORM MH EACH 1 $5,140.00 $5,140.00 $5,825.00 $5,825.00 $5,835.00 $5,835.00 $5,478.00 $5,478.00 $6,126 00 $6,126.00 28 SAFL BAFFLE IN 7' DIA.STORM MH EACH 1 $12,150 00 $12,150.00 $15,500.00 $15,500.00 $7,740.00 $7,740.00 $13,860.00 $13,860.00 1 $8,125.00 $8,125.00 29 RANDOM RIP RAP,CLASS II CU YD 24 $81.00 $1,944.00 $118.75 $2,850.00 $83.00 $1,992 00 $75.00 $1,800.00 $100.00 $2,400.00 30 RANDOM RIP RAP,CLASS IV CU YD 62 $81.00 $5,022.00• $99.50 $6,169.00 $83.00 $5,146.00 $85.00 $5,270.00 $100.00 $6,200.00 31 CONNECT TO EXISTING STRUCTURE EACH 1 $900.00 $900.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $860.00 $860.00 $1,650.00 $1,650.00 $900.00 $900.00 32 21"FLARED END SECTION W/TRASH GUARD EACH 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $1,600.00 $1,600.00 $2,469.50 $2,469.50 $1,680.00 $1,680.00 33 30"FLARED END SECTION W/TRASH GUARD EACH 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $4,850.00 $4,850.00 $2,895.00 $2,895.00 $3,520.00 $3,520 00 $3,040.00 $3,040.00 34 54"FLARED END SECTION W/TRASH GUARD EACH 1 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $7,125.00 $7,125.00 $5,815.00 $5,815.00 $18,227.00 $18,227.00 $6,105.00 $6,105.00 35 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 TON 308 $35.00 $10,780.00 $26.05 $8,023.40 $29.00 $8,932.00 $21.34 $6,572.72 $29.25 $9,009.00 36 TYPE SPNWA330C NON-WEAR 2"THICK-STREET TON 2 $140.00 $280.00 $433.65 $867.30 $270.00 $540.00 $685.00 $1,370.00 $650.00 $1,300.00 37 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 2 $20.00 $40.00 $30.25 $60.50 $22.00 $44.00 $0.01 $0.02 $0.01 $0.02 38 TYPE SPWEA330C WEAR 2"THICK-STREET TON 2 $140.00 $280.00 $433.65 $867.30 $270.00 $540.00 $685.00 $1,370.00 $650.00 $1,300.00 39 TYPE SPWEA330B WEAR 3"THICK-TRAIL TON 131 $140.00 $18,340.00 $101.35 $13,276.85 $131.00 $17,161.00 $111.00 $14,541.00 $105.00 $13,755.00 40 DECIDUOUS TREE 2"CAL B&B TREE 11 $600.00 $6,600.00 $521.00 $5,731.00 $567.00 $6,237.00 $574.00 $6,314.00 I $788.00 $8,668.00 41 CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EACH 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,085.00 $1,085.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $1,250.00 $1,250.00 42 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH 2 $200.00 $400.00 $281.15 $562.30 $120.00 $240.00 $200.00 $400.00 $150.00 $300.00 43 FLOATING SILT CURTAIN LIN FT 450 $6.00 $2,700.00 $9.00 $4,050.00 $11.00 $4,950.00 $30.00 $13,500.00 $22.00 $9,900.00 44 SANDY CLAY LOAM TOPSOIL BORROW(LV) CU YD 280 $8.00 $2,240.00 $32.65 $9,142.00 $29.00 $8,120.00 $38.00 $10,640.00 l $35.50 $9,940.00 45 COMPOST GRAD 2(LV) CU YD 280 $8.00 $2,240.00 $32.65 $9,142.00 $29.00 $8,120.00 $45.00 $12,600.00 $42.00 $11,760.00 46 SITE GRADING SQYD 6844 $4.50 $30,798.00 $0.25 $1,711.00 $2.25 $15,399.00 $1.00 $6,844.00I $0.85 $5,817.40 SEEDING WITH MNDOT 25-151 SEED MIXTURE,FERTILIZER TYPE 3,AND 47 CATEGORY 3N BLANKET SQYD 830 $4.00 $3,320.00 $1.60 $1,328.00 $3.30 $2,739.00 $3.88 $3,220.40 $3.75 $3,112.50 SEEDING WITH MNDOT 33-261 SEED MIXTURE,FERTILIZER TYPE 3,ANDI 48 CATEGORY 3N BLANKET SQYD 2526 $5.00 $12,630.00 $1.70 $4,294.20 $3.30 $8,335.80 $3.88 $9,800.88 $3.75 $9,472.50 Base Bid Total: $496,453.00 $414,294.30 $428,242.80 $438,596.84 $454,713.00 EXHIBIT A Project Name: REDWOOD POND EXPANSION City Project No.: 2020-102 Bid Opening:Tuesday,July 7,2020,at 10:00 A.M,C.S.T.-ELECTRONIC .1I AppValley Minnesota Dirt Works US SiteWork Veit&Company,Inc. New Look Contracting,Inc. Standard Contracting Section Title Item Code Item Description UofM Quantity Unit Price Extension Unit Price Extension Unit Price Extension Unit Price Extension Unit Price Extension Base Bid $454,826.60 $457,481.40 $462,610.22 $468,009.00 $482,559.00 1 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 1 $22,000.00 $22,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $52,680.00 $52,680.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $19,500.00 $19,500.00 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $6,800.00 $6,800.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $1,250.00 $1,250.00 3 POND DEWATERING LUMP SUM 1 $12,500.00 $12,500.00 $21,000.00 $21,000.00 $10,300.00 $10,300.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $16,250 00 $16,250.00 4 STREET SWEEPER(WITH PICKUP BROOM) HOURS 15 $135.00 $2,025.00 $151.00 $2,265.00 $130.00 $1,950.00 $1.00 $15.00 $180.00 $2,700.00 5 CLEARING TREE 33 $245.00 $8,085.00 $295.00 $9,735.00 $222.00 $7,326.00 $375.00 $12,375.00 $269 00 $8,877.00 6 GRUBBING TREE 33 $165.00 $5,445.00 $197.00 $6,501.00 $222.00 $7,326.00 $125.00 $4,125.00 $180.00 $5,940.00 7 REMOVE AND REPLACE CURB AND GUTTER LIN FT 20 $100.00 $2,000.00 $107.00 $2,140.00 $160.00 $3,200.00 $100.00 $2,000.00 $136.00 $2,720 00 8 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT-STREET SQYD 20 $9.25 $185.00 $19.50 $390.00 $27.00 $540.00 $27.00 $540.00 $42.00 $840.00 9 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT-TRAIL SQYD 892 $6.00 $5,352.00 $3.30 $2,943.60 $3.50 $3,122.00 $6.00 $5,352.00 $8.00 $7,136.00 10 MUCK EXCAVATION(EV)(P)-MANAGEMENT LEVEL 3 CU YD 860 $62.50 $53,750.00 $71.00 $61,060.00 $55.25 $47,515.00 $75.00 $64,500.00 $60.00 $51,600.00 11 COMMON EXCAVATION(EV)(P) CU YD 6455 $21.00 $135,555.00 $17.00 $109,735 00 $15.00 $96,825.00 $19.00 $122,645.00 $18.50 $119,417.50 12 REMOVE 18"RCP STORM SEWER LIN FT 112 $22.00 $2,464.00 $22.50 $2,520.00 $50.00 $5,600.00 $25.00 $2,800.00 $37.00 $4,144.00 13 REMOVE 21"RCP STORM SEWER LIN FT 64 $23.00 $1,472.00 $24.50 $1,568.00 $50.00 $3,200.00 $25.00 $1,600.00 $40.00 $2,560.00 14 REMOVE 30"RCP STORM SEWER LIN FT 20 $24.00 $480.00 $33.50 $670.00 $70.00 $1,400.00 $50.00 $1,000.00 $44.00 $880.00 15 REMOVE 54"RCP STORM SEWER LIN FT 40 $39.00 $1,560.00 $50.50 $2,020.00 $70.00 $2,800.00 $50.00 $2,000.00 $61.00 $2,440.00 16 REMOVE MANHOLE OR CATCH BASIN INCL CASTING EACH 2 $650.00 $1,300.00 $386.00 $772.00 $700.00 $1,400.00 $750.00 $1,500.00 $2,750.00 $5,500.00 17 REMOVE FLARED END SECTION EACH 3 $325.00 $975.00 $277.00 $831.00 $630.00 $1,890.00 $250.00 $750.00 $360.00 $1,080.00 18 18"RC PIPE SEWER CLASS V LIN FT 114 $69.00 $7,866.00 $64.00 $7,296.00 $53.00 $6,042.00 $80.00 $9,120.00 $97.50 $11,115.00 19 30"RC PIPE SEWER CLASS IV LIN FT 91 $120.00 $10,920.00 $116.00 $10,556.00 $116.00 $10,556.00 $150.00 $13,650.00 $163.00 $14,833.00 20 30"RC PIPE BEND 22.5 DEGREES EACH 1 $2,400.00 $2,400.00 $1,105.00 $1,105.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $2,250.00 $2,250.00 $1,800.00 $1,800.00 21 4'DIA.STORM MH,8'DEEP,INCL R-1642 CSTG AND HDPE ADJ RINGS EACH 1 $5,350.00 $5,350.00 $5,055.00 $5,055.00 $3,640.00 $3,640.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 $7,025.00 $7,025.00 22 5'DIA.STORM MH,8'DEEP,INCL R-1642 CSTG AND HDPE ADJ RINGS EACH 1 $9,000.00 $9,000.00 $8,460.00 $8,460.00 $5,230.00 $5,230.00 $9,000.00 $9,000.00 $13,500.00 $13,500.00 23 7'DIA.STORM MI-I,8'DEEP,INCL R-1642 CSTG AND HDPE ADJ RINGS EACH 1 $12,150.00 $12,150.00 $13,260.00 $13,260.00 $9,930.00 $9,930.00 $17,000.00 $17,000.00 $17,250.00 $17,250.00 24 5'STORM MANHOLE OVERDEPTH LIN FT 3 $700.00 $2,100.00 $514.00 $1,542.00 $1,620.00 $4,860.00 $500.00 $1,500.00 $1,150.00 $3,450.00 25 7'STORM MANHOLE OVERDEPTH LIN FT 2 $1,200.00 $2,400.00 $957.00 $1,914.00 $2,100.00 $4,200.00 $900.00 $1,800.00 $1,500.00 $3,000.00 26 POND OUTLET STRUCTURE EACH 1 $29,500.00 $29,500.00 $22,350.00 $22,350.00 $27,630.00 $27,630.00 $26,500.00 $26,500.00 $33,000.00 $33,000.00 27 SAFL BAFFLE IN 4'DIA.STORM MH EACH 1 $6,300.00 $6,300.00 $7,230.00 $7,230.00 $6,800.00 $6,800.00 $5,500.00 $5,500.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 28 SAFL BAFFLE IN 7'DIA.STORM MH EACH 1 $16,000.00 $16,000.00 $14,050.00 $14,050.00 $14,700.00 $14,700.00 $13,500.00 $13,500.00 $7,800.00 $7,800.00 29 RANDOM RIP RAP,CLASS II CU YD 24 $105.00 $2,520.00 $125.00 $3,000.00 $94.00 $2,256.00 $100.00 $2,400.00 $158.00 $3,792.00 30 RANDOM RIP RAP,CLASS IV CU YD 62 $96.00 $5,952.00 $131.00 $8,122.00 $100.00 $6,200.00 $100.00 $6,200.00 $143.00 $8,866.00 31 CONNECT TO EXISTING STRUCTURE EACH 1 $900.00 $900.00 $1,260.00 $1,260.00 $7,900.00 $7,900.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,150.00 $1,150.00 32 21"FLARED END SECTION W/TRASH GUARD EACH 1 $1,900.00 $1,900.00 $1,945.00 $1,945.00 $3,060.00 $3,060.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,050.00 $2,050.00 33 30"FLARED END SECTION W/TRASH GUARD EACH 1 $2,950.00 $2,950.00 $3,090.00 $3,090.00 $4,160.00 $4,160.00 $2,750.00 $2,750.00 $2,950.00 $2,950.00 34 54"FLARED END SECTION W/TRASH GUARD EACH 1 $7,300.00 $7,300.00 $6,940.00 $6,940.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $6,500.00 $6,500.00 $6,500.00 $6,500.00 35 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 TON 308 $27.00 $8,316.00 $27.00 $8,316.00 $29.00 $8,932.00 $22.00 $6,776.00 $35.00 $10,780.00 36 TYPE SPNWA330C NON-WEAR 2"THICK-STREET TON 2 $702.50 $1,405.00 $735.00 $1,470.00 $692.00 $1,384.00 $700.00 $1,400.00 $275.00 $550.00 37 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 2 $12.00 $24.00 $1.00 $2.00 $0.01 $0.02 $1.00 $2.00 $22.00 $44.00 38 TYPE SPWEA330C WEAR 2"THICK-STREET TON 2 $710.00 $1,420.00 $735.00 $1,470.00 $692.00 $1,384.00 $700.00 $1,400.00 $275.00 $550.00 39 TYPE SPWEA330B WEAR 3"THICK-TRAIL TON 131 $101.50 $13,296.50 $119.00 $15,589.00 $112.00 $14,672.00 $115.00 $15,065.00 $131.50 $17,226.50 40 DECIDUOUS TREE 2"CAL B&B TREE 11 $655.00 $7,205.00 $863.00 $9,493.00 $575.00 $6,325.00 $575.00 $6,325.00 $572.00 $6,292.00 41 CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EACH 1 $1,400.00 $1,400.00 $858.00 $858.00 $1,775.00 $1,775.00 $1.00 $1.00 $2,150.00 $2,150.00 42 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH 2 $150.00 $300.00 $187.00 $374.00 $168.00 $336.00 $250.00 $500.00 $180.00 $360.00 43 FLOATING SILT CURTAIN LIN FT 450 $15.00 $6,750.00 $26.50 $11,925.00 $15.50 $6,975.00 $20.00 $9,000.00 $13.50 $6,075.00 44 SANDY CLAY LOAM TOPSOIL BORROW(LV) CU YD 280 $33.50 $9,380.00 $35.50 $9,940.00 $43.50 $12,180.00 $35.00 $9,800.00 $41.00 $11,480.00 45 COMPOST GRAD 2(LV) CU YD 280 $36.00 $10,080.00 $42.00 $11,760.00 $35.00 $9,800.00 $30.00 $8,400.00 $41.00 $11,480.00 46 SITE GRADING SQYD 6844 $1.00 $6,844.00 $1.20 $8,212.80 $1.30 $8,897.20 $2.00 $13,688.00 $1.50 $10,266.00 SEEDING WITH MNDOT 25-151 SEED MIXTURE,FERTILIZER TYPE 3,AND 47 CATEGORY 3N BLANKET SQYD 830 $1.90 $1,577.00 $3 50 $2,905.00 $2.00 $1,660.00 $5.00 $4,150.00 $2.50 $2,075.00 SEEDING WITH MNDOT 33-261 SEED MIXTURE,FERTILIZER TYPE 3,AND 48 CATEGORY 3N BLANKET SQYD 2526 $1.85 $4,673.10 $3.50 $8,841.00 $2.00 $5,052.00 $5.00 $12,630.00 $2.50 $6,315.00 Base Bid Total: $454,826.60 $457,481.40 _ $462,610.22 $468,009.00 $482,559.00 Project Name: REDWOOD POND EXPANSION City Project No.: 2020-102 Bid Opening:Tuesday,July 7,2020,at 10:00A.M.,C.S.T.-ELECTRONIC .. I e... MO Apple„ Valley Frattalone Companies Meyer Contracting Inc. Dahn Construction Max Steininger,Inc. Blackstone Contractors LLC Section Title Item Code Item Description UofM Quantity Unit Price Extension Unit Price Extension Unit Price Extension Unit Price Extension Unit Price Extension Base Bid $491,181.20 $513,087.50 $524,124.00 $525,847.38 $674,488.90 1 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 1 $42,720.00 $42,720.00 $25,654.37 $25,654.37 $57,205.40 $57,205.40 $63,141.86 $63,141.86 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 $2,650.00 $2,650.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 $793.00 $793.00 $2,675.19 $2,675.19 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 3 POND DEWATERING LUMP SUM 1 $31,170.00 $31,170.00 $30,109.07 $30,109.07 $42,680.00 $42,680.00 $46,895 75 $46,895.75 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 4 STREET SWEEPER(WITH PICKUP BROOM) HOURS 15 $165.00 $2,475.00 $150.00 $2,250.00 $170.00 $2,550.00 $135.50 $2,032.50 $165.00 $2,475.00 5 CLEARING TREE 33 $212.00 $6,996.00 $244.80 $8,078.40 $226.00 $7,458.00 $387.67 $12,793.11 $275.00 $9,075.00 6 GRUBBING TREE 33 $212.00 $6,996.00 $163.20 $5,385.60 $227.00 $7,491.00 $129.22 $4,264.26 $185.00 $6,105.00 7 REMOVE AND REPLACE CURB AND GUTTER LIN FT 20 $62.50 $1,250.00 $150.63 $3,012 60 $79.50 $1,590.00 $35.61 $712.20 $95.00 $1,900.00 8 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT-STREET SQYD 20 $84.75 $1,695.00 $33.95 $679.00 $18.00 $360.00 $21.53 $430.60 $28.00 $560.00 9 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT-TRAIL SQYD 892 $2.30 $2,051.60 $2.94 $2,622.48 $4.00 $3,568.00 $4.28 $3,817.76 $15.00 $13,380.00 10 MUCK EXCAVATION(EV)(P)-MANAGEMENT LEVEL 3 CU YD 860 $45.50 $39,130.00 $61.84 $53,182.40 $63.50 $54,610.00 $61.59 $52,967.40 $75.00 $64,500.00 11 COMMON EXCAVATION(EV)(P) CU YD 6455 $17.70 $114,253.50 $24.04 $155,178 20 $23.50 $151,692.50 $16.49 $106,442.95 $31 00 $200,105.00 12 REMOVE 18"RCP STORM SEWER LIN FT 112 $24.25 $2,716.00 $19.45 $2,178.40 $15.00 $1,680.00 $13.14 $1,471.68 $32.00 $3,584.00 13 REMOVE 21"RCP STORM SEWER LIN FT 64 $32.00 $2,048.00 $19.46 $1,245.44 $21.00 $1,344.00 $14.44 $924.16 $35.00 $2,240.00 14 REMOVE 30"RCP STORM SEWER LIN FT 20 $51.25 $1,025.00 $19.45 $389.00 $24.00 $480.00 $22.26 $445.20 $48.00 $960.00 15 REMOVE 54"RCP STORM SEWER LIN FT 40 $85.25 $3,410.00 $19.45 $778.00 $29.00 $1,160.00 $28.34 $1,133.60 $85.00 $3,400.00 16 REMOVE MANHOLE OR CATCH BASIN INCL CASTING EACH 2 $682.00 $1,364.00 $460.64 $921.28 $602.00 $1,204.00 $2,138.12 $4,276.24 $2,275.00 $4,550.00 17 REMOVE FLARED END SECTION EACH 3 $341.00 $1,023.00 $215.08 $645.24 $471.00 $1,413.00 $119.85 $359.55 $500.00 $1,500.00 18 18"RC PIPE SEWER CLASS V LIN FT 114 $64.00 $7,296.00 $58.34 $6,650.76 $54.50 $6,213.00 $75.33 $8,587.62 $82.00 $9,348.00 19 30'RC PIPE SEWER CLASS IV LIN FT 91 $259.00 $23,569.00 $114.63 $10,431.33 $118.50 $10,783.50 $155.32 $14,134.12 $159.00 $14,469.00 20 30"RC PIPE BEND 22.5 DEGREES EACH 1 $3,090.00 $3,090.00 $2,492.76 $2,492.76 $2,944.00 $2,944.00 $3,805.02 $3,805.02 $2,570.00 $2,570.00 21 4'DIA.STORM MH,8'DEEP,INCL R-1642 CSTG AND HOPE ADJ RINGS EACH 1 $4,740.00 $4,740.00 $5,415.48 $5,415.48 $3,121.00 $3,121.00 $4,867.92 $4,867.92 $8,920.00 $8,920.00 22 5'DIA.STORM MH,8'DEEP, INCL R-1642 CSTG AND HDPE ADJ RINGS EACH 1 $6,930.00 $6,930.00 $7,679.12 $7,679.12 $5,582.00 $5,582.00 $7,558.07 $7,558.07 $11,950.00 $11,950.00 23 7'DIA.STORM MH,8'DEEP,INCL R-1642 CSTG AND HOPE ADJ RINGS EACH 1 $15,710.00 $15,710.00 $13,003.83 $13,003.83 $9,092.00 $9,092.00 $12,071.92 $12,071.92 $21,800 00 $21,800.00 24 5'STORM MANHOLE OVERDEPTH LIN FT 3 $1,410.00 $4,230.00 $323.61 $970.83 $336.00 $1,008.00 $261.36 $784.08 $2,175.00 $6,525.00 25 7'STORM MANHOLE OVERDEPTH LIN FT 2 $725.50 $1,451.00 $670.64 $1,341.28 $978.00 $1,956.00 $541.63 $1,083.26 $3,200.00 $6,400.00 26 POND OUTLET STRUCTURE EACH 1 $35,180.00 $35,180.00 $36,826.63 $36,826.63 $34,442.00 $34,442.00 $43,153.83 $43,153.83 $38,750.00 $38,750.00 27 SAFL BAFFLE IN 4'DIA.STORM MH EACH 1 $5,690.00 $5,690.00 $7,816.69 $7,816.69 $5,700.00 $5,700.00 $6,113.24 $6,113.24 $6,300.00 $6,300.00 28 SAFL BAFFLE IN 7'DIA.STORM MH EACH 1 $8,470.00 $8,470.00 $17,631.38 $17,631.38 $7,350.00 $7,350.00 $15,882.06 $15,882.06 $15,500.00 $15,500 00 29 RANDOM RIP RAP,CLASS II CU YD 24 $110.50 $2,652.00 $174.32 $4,183.68 $96 00 $2,304.00 $90.09 $2,162.16 $125.00 $3,000.00 30 RANDOM RIP RAP,CLASS IV CU YD 62 $96.25 $5,967.50 $196.44 $12,179.28 $96.00 $5,952.00 $105.74 $6,555.88 $125.00 $7,750.00 31 CONNECT TO EXISTING STRUCTURE EACH 1 $5,460.00 $5,460.00 $1,747.13 $1,747.13 $2,696.00 $2,696.00 $984.47 $984.47 $2,700.00 $2,700.00 32 21"FLARED END SECTION W/TRASH GUARD EACH 1 $2,920.00 $2,920.00 $2,413.54 $2,413.54 $2,518.00 $2,518.00 $1,760.65 $1,760.65 $2,100.00 $2,100.00 33 30" FLARED END SECTION W/TRASH GUARD EACH 1 $2,870.00 $2,870.00 $3,242.82 $3,242,82 $3,389.00 $3,389.00 $2,804.78 $2,804.78 $2,900.00 $2,900.00 34 54"FLARED END SECTION W/TRASH GUARD EACH 1 $7,380.00 $7,380.00 $7,974.22 $7,974.22 $7,934.00 $7,934.00 $6,923.18 $6,923.18 $7,000.00 $7,000.00 35 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 TON 308 $21.75 $6,699.00 $32.50 $10,010.00 $27.50 $8,470.00 $24.28 $7,478.24 $38.00 $11,704.00 36 TYPE SPNWA330C NON-WEAR 2"THICK-STREET TON 2 $328.50 $657.00 $941.34 $1,882.68 $453.00 $906.00 $462.22 $924.44 $700.00 $1,400.00 37 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 2 $31.75 $63.50 $0.01 $0.02 $4.00 $8.00 $31.80 $63.60 $1.00 $2.00 38 TYPE SPWEA330C WEAR 2"THICK-STREET TON 2 $328.50 $657.00 $616.89 $1,233.78 $453.00 $906.00 $462.22 $924.44 $700.00 $1,400.00 39 TYPE SPWEA330B WEAR 3"THICK-TRAIL TON 131 $113.50 $14,868.50 $99.67 $13,056.77 $141.00 $18,471.00 $107.59 $14,094.29 $110.00 $14,410.00 40 DECIDUOUS TREE 2"CAL B&B TREE 11 $794.00 $8,734.00 $750.00 $8,250.00 $585.00 $6,435.00 $481.53 $5,296.83 $600.00 $6,600.00 41 CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EACH 1 $2,380.00 $2,380.00 $2,099.75 $2,099.75 $2,476.00 $2,476 00 $3,618.41 $3,618.41 $2,850.00 $2,850.00 42 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH 2 $406.50 $813.00 $120.00 $240.00 $285.00 $570.00 $236.70 $473.40 $200.00 $400.00 43 FLOATING SILT CURTAIN LIN FT 450 $25.50 $11,475.00 $22.00 $9,900.00 $11.00 $4,950.00 $16.85 $7,582.50 $17.00 $7,650.00 44 SANDY CLAY LOAM TOPSOIL BORROW(LV) Cu YD 280 $36.50 $10,220.00 $39.40 $11,032.00 $24.50 $6,860.00 $31.97 $8,951.60 $38.00 $10,640.00 45 COMPOST GRAD 2(LV) CU YD 280 $25.25 $7,070.00 $12.14 $3,399.20 $32.00 $8,960.00 $38.85 $10,878.00 $38.00 $10,640.00 46 SITE GRADING SQYD 6844 $1.20 $8,212.80 $0.45 $3,079.80 $0.65 $4,448.60 $1.27 $8,691.88 $1.15 $7,870.60 SEEDING WITH MNDOT 25-151 SEED MIXTURE,FERTILIZER TYPE 3,AND 47 CATEGORY 3N BLANKET SQYD 830 $3.80 $3,154.00 $3.00 $2,490.00 $3.40 $2,822.00 $3.83 $3,178.90 $2.45 $2,033.50 SEEDING WITH MNDOT 33-261 SEED MIXTURE,FERTILIZER TYPE 3,AND 48 CATEGORY 3N BLANKET SQYD 2526 $3.80 $9,598.80 $3.01 $7,603.26 $3.00 $7,578.00 $3.83 $9,674.58 $2.80 $7,072.80 Base Bid Total: $491,181.20 $513,087.50 $524,124.00 $525,847.38 $674,488.90 • ITEM: 4.H. ..... :�. Apple COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 23, 2020 Valley SECTION: Consent Agenda Description: Approve Personnel Report Staff Contact: Department/ Division: Melissa Haas, Human Resources Manager Human Resources Division ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the personnel report. SUMMARY: The employment actions attached to this memo are recommended for City Council Approval. BACKGROUND: The City Council's approval of the Personnel Report includes the ratification of the City Administrator's actions in carrying out the terms and conditions of the employment of the City personnel. BUDGET IMPACT: Budgeted positions. ATTACHMENTS: Personnel Report PERSONNEL REPORT City of Apple Valley July 23,2020 Human Resources The following employment actions are recommended for City Council approval: First Last Base Pay Pay Pay Date Name Name Action Position Status Dept. Rate Type Scale (on or about) Accept Full-Time, Donald Harmsen Retirement Building Inspector Regular 1400 7/17/2020 The Council's approval of the Personnel Report includes the ratification of the City Administrator's actions in carrying out the terms and conditions of the employment of the City personnel. Page 1 of 1 • ITEM: 4.1. ..... :�. Apple COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 23, 2020 Valley SECTION: Consent Agenda Description: Approve Claims and Bills Staff Contact: Department/ Division: Ron Hedberg, Finance Director Finance Department ACTION REQUESTED: Approve claims and bills. SUMMARY: Attached for City Council review and approval are check registers for recent claims and bills. BACKGROUND: N/A BUDGET IMPACT: Check registers dated July 1, 2020, and July 8, 2020, in the amounts of $979,427.00, and $545,367.03, respectively. ATTACHMENTS: Claims and Bills Claims and Bills R55CKR2 LC I CITY OF APPL EY 7/1/20 38:40 Council Check Register by GL Page- 1 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 4/8/2020 -- 7/3/2020 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 21949 7/3/2020 100101 ACE HARDWARE 1.89- DISCOUNT 376456 101305885841 1060.6333 GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS MUNICIPAL BLDG&GROUNDS MNTC 18.98 FLAT FILE,SAND PAPER 376456 101305885841 1060.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES MUNICIPAL BLDG&GROUNDS MNTC 4.80- DISCOUNT 376747 101305886461 1060.6333 GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS MUNICIPAL BLDG&GROUNDS MNTC 47.95 PAINTING SUPPLIES 376747 101305886461 1060.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES MUNICIPAL BLDG&GROUNDS MNTC .75- DISCOUNT 376454 101310885611 1340.6333 GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS FIRE BLDG&GROUNDS MNTC 14.08 INSECT KILLER SPRAY 376454 101310885611 1340,6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE BLDG&GROUNDS MNTC 1.00- DISCOUNT 376455 101310885791 1340.6333 GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS FIRE BLDG&GROUNDS MNTC 9.99 MOP HEAD CLEANING SUPPLIES 376455 101310885791 1340.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE BLDG&GROUNDS MNTC 7.49- DISCOUNT 376743 101340886501 5270.6333 GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS ARENA 2 EQUIPMENT MAINT-HAYES 74.91 KEYS FOR GATES AND TOOLS 376743 101340886501 5270.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA 2 EQUIPMENT MAINT-HAYES 2.00- DISCOUNT 376457 101360885471 1765.6333 GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 19.99 PUSH MOWER BELT 376457 101360885471 1765.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 1.91- DISCOUNT 376458 101360885911 1730.6333 COVID-19 GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE 19.16 AVCC DIVIDERS 376458 101360885911 1730.6229 COVID-19 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1.39- DISCOUNT 376453 101370885351 1255.6333 GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS POLICE GUN RANGE 13.98 WASP/BEE SPRAY FOR RANGE 376453 101370885351 1255.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE GUN RANGE 3.60- DISCOUNT 376740 101370885461 1255.6333 GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS POLICE GUN RANGE 58.90 BUG SPRAY FOR RANGE 376740 101370885461 1255.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE GUN RANGE .86- DISCOUNT 376749 101370886311 1210.6333 GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS POLICE FIELD OPERATIONS/PATROL 8.59 FOR LOCK-OUT STICK TIPS 376749 101370886311 1210.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE FIELD OPERATIONS/PATROL 7.59- DISCOUNT 376744 101380886611 1940.6333 GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS AQUATIC SWIM CENTER 75.93 PAINTING SUPPLIES 376744 101380886611 1940.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES AQUATIC SWIM CENTER 24,28- DISCOUNT 376741 101400883611 5320.6333 GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/RPR 249,78 HUMID IN PIT @ WELL#11 376741 101400883611 5320.6211 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/RPR 1.70- DISCOUNT 376746 101400885591 5380.6333 GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS SEWER LIFT STN REPAIR&MNTC 16.99 AC BLOWOUT 376746 101400885591 5380.6211 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT SEWER LIFT STN REPAIR&MNTC .30- DISCOUNT 376742 101400885601 5380.6333 GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS SEWER LIFT STN REPAIR&MNTC 2,99 AIR PARTS 376742 101400885601 5380.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS SEWER LIFT STN REPAIR&MNTC 4.10- DISCOUNT 376745 101400885641 5310_6333 GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS WATER METER RPR/REPLACE/READNC 40.96 METER INSTALLATION SUPPLIES 376745 101400885641 5310.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER METER RPR/REPLACE/READNC 5.11- DISCOUNT 376748 101400885761 5380.6333 GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS SEWER LIFT STN REPAIR&MNTC 51.09 LIFT PUMP REPAIR LIFT 11 376748 101400885761 5380.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS SEWER LIFT STN REPAIR&MNTC 2.50- DISCOUNT 376750 101400886181 5320.6333 GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/RPR 24.99 WEED KILLER-WELL HOUSES 376750 101400886181 5320.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/RPR 29.99 WEED SPRAYER-WELL HOUSES 376750 101400886181 5320.6211 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/RPR 707.98 21950 7/3/2020 148541 ALL TRAFFIC SOLUTIONS 570.00 DRIVER FEEDBACK SIGN BATTERY 376553 SIN025703 1685.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET MARKING&TRAFFIC CONTR R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 7/1/2020 15:38:40 Council Check Register by GL Page- 2 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 4/8/2020 -- 7/3/2020 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 21950 7/3/2020 148541 ALL TRAFFIC SOLUTIONS Continued... 570.00 21951 7/3/2020 144685 AM CRAFT SPIRITS INC 36.00 TAX#1 00051504 376606 10805 5015.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 137.76 NTAX#1 00051504 376607 10805 5015.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 2.00 FREIGHT#1 00051504 376608 10805 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 175.76 21952 7/3/2020 101318 AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS COMPANY 1,273.00 TRANSDUCER WELL#11 376581 350825 5320.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/RPR 445.65 LIFT 5 REPAIR 376577 35085S 5380.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT SEWER LIFT STN REPAIR&MNTC 1,718.65 21953 7/3/2020 101559 BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY 1,997.50 DESIGN-DWSMA REVIEW 376556 23191441001 4502.6235 2019139G CONSULTANT SERVICES IMPROVEMENTS-ASSESSED 1,997.50 21954 7/3/2020 100054 BAUER BUILT INC 221.90 STREETS MOWER TIRES 376557 180262271 1630.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS STREET EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 324.80 TIRES#418 376557 180262271 5390.6216 VEHICLES-TIRES/BATTERIES SWR EQUIPNEHICLE MISC MNTC/RP 11.87- GOLF SALES TAX ADJUST 376511 518002047 5155,6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT GOLF EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 11.87 GOLF SALES TAX ADJUST 376511 518002047 5100.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT GOLF FUND BALANCE SHEET 2,044.88 REPAIR OF TRACTOR 376511 518002047 5155.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT GOLF EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 168.45 TIRE MOUNTING#216 376548 518002288 1765.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 500.00 TIRES#216 376548 518002288 1765.6216 VEHICLES-TIRES/BATTERIES PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 123.97 TIRE BALANCE BEADS 376551 518002378 1765.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 123.97 TIRE BALANCE BEADS 376551 518002378 1630.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 123,97 TIRE BALANCE BEADS 376551 518002378 5345.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER EQUIPNEHICLE/MISC MNTC 123.99 TIRE BALANCE BEADS 376551 518002378 5390.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES SWR EQUIPNEHICLE MISC MNTC/RP 149.45 TIRE REPAIR#344 376518 518002456 1630.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT STREET EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 3,905.38 21955 7/3/2020 100058 BELLBOY CORPORATION 95.59 TAX#1 00004928 376609 101485300 5015.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 168.25 NTAX#1 00004928 376610 101485300 5015.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 30.25 LIQ#2 00004928 376616 101485500 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 246.00 LIQ#3 00004928 376628 101485600 5085,6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 27.00 TAX#3 00004928 376629 101485600 5085.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 21.25- CMNTAX#1 00004928 376611 101498800 5015.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#1 STOr'PURCHASES 57,90 TAX#1 00004928 376612 101530900 5015.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#1 ST JRCHASES R55CKR2 LC 1 CITY OF APPL .EY 7/1/20 38:40 Council Check Register by GL Page- 3 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 4/8/2020 -- 7/3/2020 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 21955 7/3/2020 100058 BELLBOY CORPORATION Continued... 21.25 NTAX#1 00004928 376613 101530900 5015.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 87.00 LIQ#3 00004928 376632 101531100 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 441.13 TAX#3 00004928 376633 101531100 '5085,6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 33.00 NTAX#3 00004928 376634 101531100 5085.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 119.55 TAX#1 00004928 376614 101570900 5015,6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 179.05 NTAX#1 00004928 376615 101570900 5015.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 192.00 LIQ#3 00004928 376637 101571100 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 338.19 WINE#1 00004928 376617 84352200 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 5.40 FREIGHT#1 00004928 376618 84352200 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 278.00 LIQ#1 00004928 376623 84414500 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 3.83 FREIGHT#1 00004928 376624 84414500 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 110.40 LIQ#2 00004928 376625 84415300 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 2.70 FREIGHT#2 00004928 376626 84415300 5055.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES .46 FREIGHT#3 00004928 376627 84415400 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 1,166.80 LIQ#1 00004928 376619 84529400 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 9.45 FREIGHT#1 00004928 376620 84529400 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 122.00 WINE#3 00004928 376630 84532300 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 1.35 FREIGHT#3 00004928 376631 84532300 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 1,657.50 LIQ#1 00004928 376621 84627900 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 17.55 FREIGHT#1 00004928 376622 84627900 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 638.00 LIQ#3 00004928 376635 84628500 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 5.40 FREIGHT#3 00004928 376636 84628500 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 6,033.75 21956 7/3/2020 151103 BEST LAWN GUY 150.00 CODE-M&T-GRASS ABATEMENT 376526 6747 1013.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES CODE ENFORCEMENT 150.00 CODE-M&T-GRASS ABATEMENT 376525 6748 1013,6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES CODE ENFORCEMENT 300.00 21957 7/3/2020 142897 BOLTON&MENK,INC. 3,996.00 DESIGN 376555 250708 4502.6235 2020134G CONSULTANT SERVICES IMPROVEMENTS-ASSESSED 8,114.00 CONSTRUCTION STAKING 376559 250713 2027.6235 2020101R CONSULTANT SERVICES ROAD ESCROW 215.00 CONSTRUCTION ADMIN 376514 250714 4502.6235 2018116G CONSULTANT SERVICES IMPROVEMENTS-ASSESSED 7,119.00 CONSTRUCTION STAKING 376560 250715 4502.6235 2019107G CONSULTANT SERVICES IMPROVEMENTS-ASSESSED 5,837.00 FEASIBILITY REPORT 376561 250717 4502.6235 2019139G CONSULTANT SERVICES IMPROVEMENTS-ASSESSED 1,619.00 SURVEY STAKING EASEMENT SIGNS 376563 250718 5505.6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES STORM DRAIN MNTC/RPR/SUMPS 7,878.50 DESIGN 376562 250719 4502.6235 2020136G CONSULTANT SERVICES IMPROVEMENTS-ASSESSED 34,778.50 21958 7/3/2020 121014 BUCKEYE CLEANING CENTER R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 7/1/2020 15:38:40 Council Check Register by GL Page- 4 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 4/8/2020 - 7/3/2020 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 21958 7/3/2020 121014 BUCKEYE CLEANING CENTER Continued... 532.00 HAND SANI DISPENSER STANDS(5) 376546 90232287 1015,6229 COVID-19 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS 875.20 HAND SANI DISPENSER STANDS(8) 376545 90232288 1015.6229 COVID-19 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS 280.56 HAND SANITIZER&CLEANER 376544 90232289 1540.6229 COVID-19 GENERAL SUPPLIES CMF BUILDINGS&GROUNDS MNTC 319,20 HAND SANITIZER DISPNSR STAND(3 376544 90232289 1015.6229 COVID-19 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS 2,006,96 21959 7/3/2020 101562 CDW GOVERNMENT INC 86.63 POWER ADAPTERS 376528 ZCZ5195 1400.6211 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT INSPECTIONS MANAGEMENT 193.87 DOCKING STATIONS 376527 ZDK4803 1030.6725 CAPITAL OUTLAY-OFFICE EQUIP INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 280.50 21960 7/3/2020 143551 CURBSIDE LANDSCAPE&IRRIGATI 543.88 IRRIGATION REPAIR 376567 205634 5605.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES CEMETERY 543.88 21961 7/3/2020 100128 DAKOTA ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION 1,785.13 LIGHT#3667 REPLACEMENT 376568 200002442135JUN 7305.6399 OTHER CHARGES VERMILLION WATERSHED 20 35.13 FOUNDERS/GALAXIE SIGNAL JUN 376573 200003777430JUN 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 20 42.33 GALAXIE/FOUNDER LN SPKLR JUN 376574 200003919925JUN 1610.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC STREET/BOULEVARD REPAIR&MNTC 20 265.44 15281 FOUNDERS BLVD LIGHTS JUN 376575 200004198750JUN 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 20 258.11 LIFT STN STORM SWR GALAXIE JUN 376578 200004229209JUN 5505.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC STORM DRAIN MNTC/RPR/SUMPS 20 5.15 CD SIREN-PILOT KNOB#394930-2 376519 200010000089JUN 1290.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC CIVIL DEFENSE MANAGEMENT 20 5.25 CD SIREN-CHAPARRAL#2010833 376519 200010000089JUN 1290.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC CIVIL DEFENSE MANAGEMENT 20 5.25 CD SIREN-WILD WOOD#2010825 376519 200010000089JUN 1290.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC CIVIL DEFENSE MANAGEMENT 20 5.25 CD SIREN-CED KNOLLS#2010817 376519 200010000089JUN 1290,6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC CIVIL DEFENSE MANAGEMENT 20 5.25 CD SIREN-GALAXIE&42#2010809 376519 200010000089JUN 1290.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC CIVIL DEFENSE MANAGEMENT 20 5.25 CD SIREN-DUCHESS#2010791 376519 200010000089JUN 1290.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC CIVIL DEFENSE MANAGEMENT 20 5.25 CD SIREN-DELANEY#2010783 376519 200010000089JUN 1290.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC CIVIL DEFENSE"4NAGEMENT 20 R55CKR2 LC 1 CITYOFAPPL .EY 7/1/2C 38:40 Council Check Register by GL Page- 5 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 4/8/2020 - 7/3/2020 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 21961 7/3/2020 100128 DAKOTA ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Continued... 5.25 CD SIREN-HUNTINGTON#2010775 376519 200010000089JUN 1290.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC CIVIL DEFENSE MANAGEMENT 20 5.25 CD SIREN-CMF#2010767 376519 200010000089JUN 1290.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC CIVIL DEFENSE MANAGEMENT 20 10.51 GARDNVW DR-SL SIGN#379233-0 376519 200010000089JUN 1210.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC POLICE FIELD OPERATIONS/PATROL 20 15.12 PK-BELMT PD AER/FOUNT#325093-3 376519 200010000089JUN 1720.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE 20 15.12 EASTVIEW PRESS BOX#2079408 376519 200010000089JUN 1730.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE 20 15.37 HAGEMEISTER TENNIS LTS#1804087 376519 200010000089JUN 1745.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC PARK CRT/GAME AREA MAINTENANCE 20 15.97 FOUNDER PK LT#366449-7 376519 200010000089JUN 1740.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC PARK SIDEWALK/PATH MAINTENANCE 20 17.81 ALIMAGNET PK RESTRM#144117-9 376519 200010000089JUN 1730,6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE 20 17.93 LEGION FLD PRESS BX#310081-5 376519 200010000089JUN 1730.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE 20 20.16 PW RADIO EQUIP#215383-1 376519 200010000089JUN 1540.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC CMF BUILDINGS&GROUNDS MNTC 20 22.22 SALT BLDG#310219-1 376519 200010000089JUN 1540.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC CMF BUILDINGS&GROUNDS MNTC 20 26.62 KELLEY PD PK/SPKLR#405066-2 376519 200010000089JUN 1720.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE 20 26.74 HUNTINGTON PK SHLTR#2014926 376519 200010000089JUN 1730.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE 20 28.95 GALAXIE PK WMHSE#481583-3 376519 200010000089JUN 1730.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE 20 34_70 SCOTT TENNIS LTS#1804079 376519 200010000089JUN 1745.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC PARK CRT/GAME AREA MAINTENANCE 20 38.87 COBBLESTONE PAVILLION 376519 200010000089JUN 1730.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE 20 40.94 AV EAST PK WMHSE#2148484 376519 200010000089JUN 1730.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE 20 57.96 HAGEMEISTER PK SHLTR#151256-5 376519 200010000089JUN 1730.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE 20 59.18 FARQ PK RESTROOMS#1617653 376519 200010000089JUN 1730.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE 20 62.60 PARK HS#4 FIELDS#224529-8 376519 200010000089JUN 1780.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC PARK HIGH SCHOOL#4 FIELDS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 7/1/2020 15:38:40 Council Check Register by GL Page- 6 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 4/8/2020 -. 7/3/2020 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 21961 7/3/2020 100128 DAKOTA ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Continued... 20 66.64 VALLEY MID PK SHLTR#1247824 376519 200010000089JUN 1730.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE 20 66.90 DELANEY PK SHLTR#151247-4 376519 200010000089JUN 1730.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE 20 127.28 REDWOOD/POOL#108328-6 376519 200010000089JUN 1730.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE 20 153.30 CMF STORAGE#2009652 376519 200010000089JUN 1540.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC CMF BUILDINGS&GROUNDS MNTC 20 178.39 FIRE STATION#3#146046-8 376519 200010000089JUN 1340.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC FIRE BLDG&GROUNDS MNTC 20 186.14 AVFAC EXPANSION#443065-8 376519 200010000089JUN 1940.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC AQUATIC SWIM CENTER 20 239.71 FIRE STATION#2#145450-3 376519 200010000089JUN 1340.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC FIRE BLDG&GROUNDS MNTC 20 484.08 EASTVIEV-HIGHLAND#1889047 376519 200010000089JUN 1715.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC PARK ATHLETIC FIELD MAINTENANC 20 497.51 TEEN CENTER#268335-7 376519 200010000089JUN 1730.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE 20 623.46 QUARRY PTATHLCPLX#456933-1 376519 200010000089JUN 1715.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC PARK ATHLETIC FIELD MAINTENANC 20 840.59 FIRE STATION#1#111343-0 376519 200010000089JUN 1340.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC FIRE BLDG&GROUNDS MNTC 20 903.79 CENTRAL MAINT FAC#511870-8 376519 200010000089JUN 1540.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC CMF BUILDINGS&GROUNDS MNTC 20 1,033,45 HAYES COMM&SR CTR#451229-9 376519 200010000089JUN 1920.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC SENIOR CENTER 20 1,070.47 AQUATIC CENTER#273061-2 376519 200010000089JUN 1940.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC AQUATIC SWIM CENTER 20 1,327,33 PARK PATHWAY LTS#2053296 376519 200010000089JUN 1740.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC PARK SIDEWALK/PATH MAINTENANCE 20 1,664.44 AV COMM CTR#1883305 376519 200010000089JUN 1900.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC AV COMMUNITY CENTER 20 4,235.27 MUNICIPAL CENTER#288247-0 376519 200010000089JUN 1060.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC MUNICIPAL BLDG&GROUNDS MNTC 20 949.04 OLD CITY HALL#517541-9 376519 200010000089JUN 2092.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC EDUCATION BUILDING FUND 20 57.75 CENTRAL VILLAGE P-LOT 376519 200010000089JUN 2097.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC CENTRAL VILLAGE PARKING LOT 20 R55CKR2 LO. CITY OF APPLI EY 7/1/20 38:40 .a Council Check Register by GL Page- 7 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 4/8/2020 - 7/3/2020 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 21961 7/3/2020 100128 DAKOTA ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Continued... 442.01 LIQUOR STORE 2#138678-8 376519 200010000089JUN 5065.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC LIQUOR#2 OPERATIONS 20 1,233.44 LIQUOR STORE 1#145003-0 376519 200010000089JUN 5025.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC LIQUOR#1 OPERATIONS 20 1,539.06 LIQUOR STORE 3#444140-8 376519 200010000089JUN 5095.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC LIQUOR#3 OPERATIONS 20 856.02 VLLYWD GOLF SPRINK-134893-7 376519 200010000089JUN 5150.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC GOLF COURSE MAINTENANCE 20 615.70 ICE ARENA#1#136723-4 376519 200010000089JUN 5210.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC ARENA 1 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 20 900,22 HAYES PK ICE ARENA#222230-5 376519 200010000089JUN 5265.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC ARENA 2 BLDG MAINTENANCE-HAYES 20 15.12 PUMPHOUSE 15#2121093 376519 200010000089JUN 5320.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/RPR 20 15.12 LIFT STN 5 WHITNEY#1116599 376519 200010000089JUN 5380.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC SEWER LIFT STN REPAIR&MNTC 20 17.56 HERALD WY PRESS STN#103686-2 376519 200010000089JUN 5320.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNTIRPR 20 18.38 PALOMINO RESERVOIR#103546-8 376519 200010000089JUN 5320.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/RPR 20 21.11 LS 9 4771 DOMINICA WY#525977- 376519 200010000089JUN 5380.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC SEWER LIFT STN REPAIR&MNTC 20 30.54 PUMPHOUSE#5#135486-9 376519 200010000089JUN 5320.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/RPR 20 31,03 WTRTWR RESERV-LONGRDG#144881- 376519 200010000089JUN 5320.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/RPR 20 44.37 LS 7 HERITAGE HILLS#144109-6 376519 200010000089JUN 5380.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC SEWER LIFT STN REPAIR&MNTC 20 50.24 LS 10 NORDIC WOODS#1830835 376519 200010000089JUN 5380.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC SEWER LIFT STN REPAIR&MNTC 20 53.79 LS 11-HIGHLAND PT CT#2021699 376519 200010000089JUN 5380.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC SEWER LIFT STN REPAIR&MNTC 20 61.15 PUMPHOUSE#2#108018-3 376519 200010000089JUN 5320.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/RPR 20 62.36 PUMPHOUSE#1#106890-7 376519 200010000089JUN 5320.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/RPR 20 73.87 PUMPHOUSE#3#106099-5 376519 200010000089JUN 5320.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/RPR 20 80_44 LIFT STN 4 PH LKSHR#1030667 376519 200010000089JUN 5380.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC SEWER LIFT STN REPAIR&MNTC R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 7/1/2020 15:38:40 Council Check Register by GL Page- Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 4/8/2020 -. 7/3/2020 Check#• Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 21961 7/3/2020 100128 DAKOTA ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Continued... 20 85.61 PUMPHOUSE 14#2008852 376519 200010000089JUN 5320.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/RPR 20 97.80 PUMPHOUSE 19#415728-5 376519 200010000089JUN 5320.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/RPR 20 111.61 PUMPHOUSE 12#2023273 376519 200010000089JUN 5320.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/RPR 20 119.26 PUMPHOUSE 08#1468404 376519 200010000089JUN 5320.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/RPR 20 127.06 PUMPHOUSE 13#2023265 376519 200010000089JUN 5320.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/RPR 20 168.41 PUMPHOUSE 20#484299 376519 200010000089JUN 5320.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/RPR 20 212.80 PUMPHOUSE#4#121151-5 376519 200010000089JUN 5320.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/RPR 20 225.19 LIFT#5#580685-6 376519 200010000089JUN 5380.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC SEWER LIFT STN REPAIR 8 MNTC 20 245.28 AV BOOSTER-NORDIC#138075-7 376519 200010000089JUN 5320.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC WATER WELUBOOSTER STN MNT/RPR 20 345.59 LFT STN3 133 CHAPARRAL 546943 376519 200010000089JUN 5380.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC SEWER LIFT STN REPAIR 8 MNTC 20 723_54 PUMPHOUSE#11#174395-4 376519 200010000089JUN 5320.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/RPR 20 984.49 LIFT STN 1 ELLICE#131715-5 376519 200010000089JUN 5380.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC SEWER LIFT STN REPAIR&MNTC 20 1,469.81 PUMPHOUSE 18#1078310 376519 200010000089JUN 5320.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/RPR 20 2,314.43 PUMPHOUSE 09#1526292 376519 200010000089JUN 5320.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/RPR 20 2,319.92 PUMPHOUSE#10#155867-5 376519 200010000089JUN 5320.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/RPR 20 2,707.75 PUMPHOUSE#7#126394-6 376519 200010000089JUN 5320.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/RPR 20 3,552.24 PUMPHOUSE 17#307438-2 376519 200010000089JUN 5320.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/RPR 20 13,951.19 WTR TREATMENT PLANT#511870-8 376519 200010000089JUN 5325.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC WATER TREATMENT FCLTY MNTC/RPR 20 17.56 LS STM SWR HGHWD#1586924 376519 200010000089JUN 5505.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC STORM DRAIN MNTC/RPR/SUMPS 20 R55CKR2 LO I CITY OF APPL EY 7/1/20 38:40 Council Check Register by GL Page• 9 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 4/8/2020 -- 7/3/2020 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 21961 7/3/2020 100128 DAKOTA ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Continued... 35.80 LS-WHEATON PONDS#443438-7 376519 200010000089JUN 5505.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC STORM DRAIN MNTC/RPR/SUMPS 20 78.64 LS STM SWR BRIAR OAKS#1827781 376519 200010000089JUN 5505.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC STORM DRAIN MNTC/RPR/SUMPS 20 88.07 LS STM SWR-BELMONT PK#2011021 376519 200010000089JUN 5505.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC STORM DRAIN MNTC/RPR/SUMPS 20 240.74 LS STM SWR PENNOCK SHR#135489 376519 200010000089JUN 5505.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC STORM DRAIN MNTC/RPR/SUMPS 20 781.74 LS STM SWR-HANNOVER#19860009 376519 200010000089JUN 5505.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC STORM DRAIN MNTC/RPR/SUMPS 20 1,305.02 LS STM SWR ALIMAGNET#144134-4 376519 200010000089JUN 5505.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC STORM DRAIN MNTC/RPR/SUMPS 20 1,511.52 LS STN COBB LK#306511-7 376519 200010000089JUN 5505.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC STORM DRAIN MNTC/RPR/SUMPS 20 1,803.54 LS 2 7698 128TH ST W#490873-7 376519 200010000089JUN 5505.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC STORM DRAIN MNTC/RPR/SUMPS 20 2,504.03 LS STM SWR FARQUAR#137184-8 376519 200010000089JUN 5505.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC STORM DRAIN MNTC/RPR/SUMPS 20 44.13 CEMETERY LTS FLAGPOLE#318998-2 376519 200010000089JUN 5605.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC CEMETERY 20 44.25 CEMETERY LTS#339637-1 376519 200010000089JUN 5605.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC CEMETERY 20 20.17 UTIL RADIO EQUIP#215383-1 376519 200010000089JUN 5805.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 20 27.07 GREENWAY TUNNEL#563183-3 376519 200010000089JUN 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 20 37.15 SIGNAL-GALAXIE&153RD#3128204 376519 200010000089JUN 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 20 39.60 SIGNAL 153RD&CUB#2013084 376519 200010000089JUN 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 20 40.82 SIGNAL-GARRETT&150TH#1802081 376519 200010000089JUN 5805,6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 20 40.94 SIGNAL-GALAXIE&140TH#2053858 376519 200010000089JUN 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 20 43.88 SIGNAL-147TH/PENNOCK#103448-7 376519 200010000089JUN 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 20 44.13 SIGNAL-140TH/FLAGSTAFF#2750370 376519 200010000089JUN 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 20 45.59 SIGNAL-GALAXIE&147TH#1022698 376519 200010000089JUN 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 7/1/2020 15:38:40 Council Check Register by GL Page- 10 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 4/8/2020 - 7/3/2020 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 21961 7/3/2020 100128 DAKOTA ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Continued... 20 46.21 SIGNAL-140TH/PENNOCK#303778-5 376519 200010000089JUN 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 20 46.44 SIGNAL-CEDAR& 145TH#2047702 376519 200010000089JUN 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 20 47.55 SIGNAL-149TH/PENNOCK#103448-7 376519 200010000089JUN 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 20 49.27 SIGNAL-14OTH/JOHNNY CK#2750412 376519 200010000089JUN 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 20 50.49 SIGNAL CEDAR&147TH#1033901 376519 200010000089JUN 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 20 50.60 SIGNAL 42&GARDENVW#124646-1 376519 200010000089JUN 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 20 53.06 SIGNAL CEDAR&140TH#1577386 376519 200010000089JUN 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 20 53.18 GASLIGHT STREET LT#267358-0 376519 200010000089JUN 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 20 53.55 TUNNEL STREET LT#279581-3 376519 200010000089JUN 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 20 53.79 SIGNAL 42&PENNOCK#1033836 376519 200010000089JUN 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 20 54.90 SIGNAL GALAXIE&150TH#1821115 376519 200010000089JUN 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 20 78.40 SIGNAL-GALAXIE&38#2146678 376519 200010000089JUN 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 20 91.61 CO RD 42/CEDAR LTS#501516-9 376519 200010000089JUN 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 20 98.22 CEDAR/147TH LTS#501520-1 376519 200010000089JUN 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 20 120.38 147TH ST W LTS#498760-8 376519 200010000089JUN 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 20 141.30 CEDAR/145TH LTS#501526-8 376519 200010000089JUN 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 20 143.64 CEDAR/140TH LTS#50,1536-7 376519 200010000089JUN 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 20 155.00 CEDAR&153RD LT#487980-5 376519 200010000089JUN 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 20 167.38 CEDAR&157RD LT#487985-4 376519 200010000089JUN 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 20 R55CKR2 LO I CITY OF APPL EY 7/1/20 38:40 Council Check Register by GL Page- 11 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 4/8/2020 -- 7/3/2020 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 21961 7/3/2020 100128 DAKOTA ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Continued... 64,882.11 UTILITY STREET LTS#1109149 376519 200010000089JUN 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 20 128,820.58 21962 7/3/2020 117768 DRAIN PRO PLUMBING 855.00 RPR/INST FLUSH VALVES MUNI BAT 376570 59433 1060.6266 REPAIRS-BUILDING MUNICIPAL BLDG&GROUNDS MNTC 855.00 21963 7/3/2020 100685 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINTENANC 1,100.50 4980 WATER LEVEL GAUGE 376549 112482 1350.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT FIRE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 1,100.50 21964 7/3/2020 153377 GRAND FORKS FIRE EQUIPMENT 3,569.16 8 FIREFIGHTER BOOT PAIRS 376550 29022 1330.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE FIRE OPERATIONS 3,569.16 21965 7/3/2020 103314 INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS 95.67 FIRST AID KIT 376584 IN2992805 5265.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA2 BLDG MAINTENANCE-HAYES 2.95 PENS FOR ENGINEERING 376476 IN3010619 1510.6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES PW ENGINEERING 8 TECHNICAL 27,57 LABELS FOR ELECTIONS 376476 IN3010619 1015.6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS 28.22 FILE FOLDERS FOR COMM DEV 376476 IN3010619 1100.6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES DEV MANAGEMENT 49.47 DISCS,STICKY NOTES 376523 IN3010788 1200.6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE MANAGEMENT 25_71 FRAMES FOR ELECTIONS 376496 IN3012295 1015.6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS 25,787.35 MC FURNITURE IT 376543 IN3012850 4002.6740 2019157G CAPITAL OUTLAY-MACH/EQUIP/OTHE MUNICIPAL BUILDINGS 26,016.94 21966 7/3/2020 118099 JEFFERSON FIRE&SAFETY INC 450.00 NO CONTACT THERMOMETERS(3) 376541 IN118715 1330.6229 COVID-19 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE OPERATIONS 450,00 21967 7/3/2020 100289 LOGIS 406.25 NETWORK SERVICES 376471 48791 1030.6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 406,25 21968 7/3/2020 100299 MASTER ELECTRIC CO 731.01 RPR FLAGPOLE LIGHT RW PROJECT 376467 SD29940 1720.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE 289.57 NO PWER PIT OR LIGHTS 376588 SD29941 5320.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/RPR 770.70 IRRIGATION REPAIR 376468 SD29942 1780.6269 REPAIRS-OTHER PARK HIGH SCHOOL#4 FIELDS 3,923.00 REPLACE ELEC PANEL LEGION 376512 SD29945 1715.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES PARK ATHLETIC FIELD MAINTENANC 5,714.28 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 7/1/2020 15:38:40 Council Check Register by GL Page- 12 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 4/8/2020 - 7/3/2020 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 21968 7/3/2020 100299 MASTER ELECTRIC CO Continued... 21969 7/3/2020 100573 MN CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSN 112,50 PERMIT TO PURCHASE CARDS 376585 10355 1200.6239 PRINTING POLICE MANAGEMENT 112.50 21970 7/3/2020 100348 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO 233.20 IRRIGATION PARTS 376480 126176300 1940.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS AQUATIC SWIM CENTER 336.87 IRRIGATION PARTS 376481 126209900 1940.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS AQUATIC SWIM CENTER 558.33 EQUIPMENT PARTS 376500 126216600 5155.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS GOLF EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 130.37 EQUIPMENT PARTS 376441 126216601 5155.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS GOLF EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 66.55 MISC IRRIGATION HEADS CMF 376582 126375600 1540.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS CMF BUILDINGS&GROUNDS MNTC 1,325.32 21971 7/3/2020 120496 NATURE CALLS INC 556,56 PORTABLE TOILETS 376502 26716 1770.6310 RENTAL EXPENSE PARK GENERAL MAINTENANCE 328.60 TOILETS 376502 26716 5150.6310 RENTAL EXPENSE GOLF COURSE MAINTENANCE 885.16 21972 7/3/2020 146279 NORDIC MECHANICAL SERVICES,I 785.00 RPR HVAC DAMPER LINK 376571 57006 1060.6266 REPAIRS-BUILDING MUNICIPAL BLDG 8 GROUNDS MNTC 785.00 21973 7/3/2020 114590 OPG-3 INC(FORMERLY CRABTREE 1,710.60 LASERFICHE LICENSE 20ADD'L 376494 4183 1030.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 1,710.60 21974 7/3/2020 100385 PLUNKETT'S PEST CONTROL INC 78.00 PEST CONTROL 376497 6675887 1930.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES REDWOOD POOL 78.00 21975 7/3/2020 150718 PRO-TEC DESIGN,INC 256.00 CAMERA REPAIR 376498 95905 1900.6266 REPAIRS-BUILDING AV COMMUNITY CENTER 8,463.89 MC LOWER LEVEL PROJ CAMERAS 376425 96774 4002.6810 2019157G CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS MUNICIPAL BUILDINGS 1,356.50 AMAG CARD ACCESS SFTWR UPGRADE 376495 96915 1030.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 338.75 MC LOWER LEVEL PROJ CAMERAS 376462 97093 4002.6810 2019157G CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS MUNICIPAL BUILDINGS 10,415.14 21976 7/3/2020 122110 REINDERS INC 523.91 CHEMICALS 376464 307163400 5150.6214 CHEMICALS GOLF COURSE MAINTENANCE 523.91 R55CKR2 LC I CITY OFAPPL EY 7/1/20 38:40 Council Check Register by GL Page- 13 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 4/8/2020 -- 7/3/2020 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 21976 7/3/2020 122110 REINDERS INC Continued... 21977 7/3/2020 144815 RIHM KENWORTH 90,318.96 NEW#319 PLOW TRK 375939 DE04001A 7440.1750.144 TRANSPOR EQUIPMNT-12 YRS VERF-STREET MAINT BAL SHT 90,318.96 21978 7/3/2020 152480 RMB ENVIRONMENTAL LAB 103.00 WATER QUALITY LAB TEST 376436 503384 5505.6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES STORM DRAIN MNTC/RPR/SUMPS 32,00 WATER QUALITY LAB TEST 376426 504760 5505.6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES STORM DRAIN MNTC/RPR/SUMPS 135.00 21979 7/3/2020 100437 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO 110.79 PAINTING SUPPLIES 376478 9080 1900.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES AV COMMUNITY CENTER 135.12 PAINT 376479 9825 1940.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES AQUATIC SWIM CENTER 245.91 21980 7/3/2020 139811 SRF CONSULTING GROUP 290.54 FEASIBILITY REPORT 376510 118540015 2027.6235 2019106R CONSULTANT SERVICES ROAD ESCROW 290.54 21981 7/3/2020 100486 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO 431.78 FS#1 GARAGE DOOR REPAIR 376537 Z139129 1340.6266 REPAIRS-BUILDING FIRE BLDG&GROUNDS MNTC 431.78 21982 7/3/2020 131594 UNIVERSAL CLEANING SERVICES IN 591.00 CMF CLEANING SERVICE JULY 376565 127720 1540.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVCMF BUILDINGS&GROUNDS MNTC 1,995,00 MUNI CNTR CLEAN SER JULY 376566 127721 1060.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVMUNICIPAL BLDG&GROUNDS MNTC 367.00 CLEANING WTP-JULY 376521 127722 5325.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVWATER TREATMENT FCLTY MNTC/RPR 2,953.00 21983 7/3/2020 100496 VAN PAPER CO 20.83- CMBAGS#1 OVERPAID 00008795 376605 53358300 5025.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR#1 OPERATIONS 284.81 BAGS#1 00008795 376603 54297700 5025.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR#1 OPERATIONS 2.85- DISCT#1 00008795 376604 54297700 5025.6333 GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS LIQUOR#1 OPERATIONS 261.13 21984 7/3/2020 122010 VINOCOPIA 135.25 WINE#3 00046257 376716 258043 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 2.50 FREIGHT#3 00046257 376717 258043 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 312.00 WINE#1 00046257 376710 258170 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 10.00 FREIGHT#1 00046257 376711 258170 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 7/1/2020 15:38:40 Council Check Register by GL Page- 14 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 4/8/2020 -- 7/3/2020 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 21984 7/3/2020 122010 VINOCOPIA Continued... 106.00 LIQ#3 00046257 376718 258171 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 2.50 FREIGHT#3 00046257 376719 258171 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 472.00 WINE#3 00046257 376720 258555 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 285,00 TAX#3 00046257 376721 258555 5085.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 25.50 FREIGHT#3 00046257 376722 258555 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 832.00 WINE#1 00046257 376712 258556 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 18.00 FREIGHT#1 00046257 376713 258556 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 152.00 TAX#1 00046257 376714 258993 5015.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 14.00 FREIGHT#1 00046257 376715 258993 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 175.25 LIQ#3 00046257 376723 258995 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 7.50 FREIGHT#3 00046257 376724 258995 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 2,549.50 21985 7/3/2020 100520 WINE COMPANY,THE 316.00 WINE#1 00015926 376725 144522 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 8.25 FREIGHT#1 00015926 376726 144522 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 1,240.00 WINE#3 00015926 376727 144523 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 24.75 FREIGHT#3 00015926 376728 144523 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 274.00 LIQ#3 00015926 376729 145108 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 4.20 WINE#3 00015926 376730 145108 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 1,867.20 21986 7/3/2020 100528 ZIEGLER INC 1,118.71 GENERATOR MAINTENANCE 375934 F1840102 1350.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT FIRE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 1,118.71 305591 7/1/2020 147492 ACUSHNET COMPANY 25.20- GOLF DISCOUNT 376503 909031966 5115.6423 GOLF-CASH DISCOUNT GOLF PRO SHOP 720.00 SHOES FOR RESALE 376503 909031966 5115.6416 GOLF-SHOES GOLF PRO SHOP 694.80 305592 7/1/2020 100089 ADVANCE AUTO PARTS 35.41 FOAM TAPE MUNI 376516 1594359303 1060.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES MUNICIPAL BLDG&GROUNDS MNTC 35.41 305593 7/1/2020 101231 ADVANCED GRAPHIX INC 180.00 HELMET DECALS 376427 203717 1330.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE FIRE OPERATIONS 180.00 305594 7/1/2( 100389 ALPHAGRAPHICS R55CKR2 LC 1 CITY OF APPL .EY 7/1/20 38:40 Council Check Register by GL Page- 15 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 4/8/2020 - 7/3/2020 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 305594 7/1/2020 100389 ALPHAGRAPHICS Continued... 59.28 BUSINESS CARDS-STEVE ROTHER 376431 111749 1710,6239 PRINTING PARK MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT 41.70 FLOOR GRAPHICS 376477 111758 1900.6239 COVID-19 PRINTING AV COMMUNITY CENTER 166.80 FLOOR GRAPHICS 376477 111758 1920.6239 COVID-19 PRINTING SENIOR CENTER 208.50 FLOOR GRAPHICS 376477 111758 1060.6239 COVID-19 PRINTING MUNICIPAL BLDG&GROUNDS MNTC 3.81- LIQ USE TAX 376477 111758 5000.2330 COVID-19 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.27 LIQ1 USE TAX 376477 111758 5025.6239 COVID-19 PRINTING LIQUOR#1 OPERATIONS 1.27 LIQ2 USE TAX 376477 111758 5065,6239 COVID-19 PRINTING LIQUOR#2 OPERATIONS 1.27 LIQ3 USE TAX 376477 111758 5095.6239 COVID-19 PRINTING LIQUOR#3 OPERATIONS 18.41 FLOOR GRAPHICS 376477 111758 5065.6239 COVID-19 PRINTING LIQUOR#2 OPERATIONS 18.41 FLOOR GRAPHICS 376477 111758 5025.6239 COVID-19 PRINTING LIQUOR#1 OPERATIONS 18.42 FLOOR GRAPHICS 376477 111758 5095,6239 COVID-19 PRINTING LIQUOR#3 OPERATIONS 83.40 FLOOR GRAPHICS 376477 111758 5265.6239 COVID-19 PRINTING ARENA 2 BLDG MAINTENANCE-HAYES 614.92 305595 7/1/2020 153995 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 17.98 PHONE CASE J PRZYBYLSKI 376586 13PGQ6PQ6HLR 1600.6211 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT STREET MANAGEMENT 97.22 IRRIGATION PARTS-KELLEY 376450 14HDVCPV9R3G 1720.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE 46.80 TOILET REPAIR PARTS 376449 1GTHDH4FRY1M 1730,6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE 37.98 MICROFIBER CLOTHS FOR PLAXI 376448 1GTHDH4FVGRJ 1540.6229 COVID-19 GENERAL SUPPLIES CMF BUILDINGS&GROUNDS MNTC 99.28 NO TOUCH THERMOMETERS 376448 1GTHDH4FVGRJ 1540.6229 COVID-19 GENERAL SUPPLIES CMF BUILDINGS&GROUNDS MNTC 10.23- LIQ USE TAX 376448 1GTHDH4FVGRJ 5000.2330 COVID-19 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3.41 LIQ3 USE TAX 376448 1GTHDH4FVGRJ 5095.6229 COVID-19 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR#3 OPERATIONS 3.41 LIQ2 USE TAX 376448 1GTHDH4FVGRJ 5065.6229 COVID-19 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR#2 OPERATIONS 3.41 LIQ1 USE TAX 376448 1GTHDH4FVGRJ 5025.6229 COVID-19 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR#1 OPERATIONS 49.64 NO TOUCH THERMOMETER 376448 1GTHDH4FVGRJ 5095.6229 COVID-19 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR#3 OPERATIONS 49,64 NO TOUCH THERMOMETER 376448 1GTHDH4FVGRJ 5065.6229 COVID-19 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR#2 OPERATIONS 49.64 NO TOUCH THERMOMETER 376448 1GTHDH4FVGRJ 5025.6229 COVID-19 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR#1 OPERATIONS 6.83- GOLF USE TAX 376448 1GTHDH4FVGRJ 5100.2330 COVID-19 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT GOLF FUND BALANCE SHEET 6.83 GOLF USE TAX 376448 1GTHDH4FVGRJ 5110.6229 COVID-19 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF CLUBHOUSE BUILDING 99.28 NO TOUCH THERMOMETERS 376448 1GTHDH4FVGRJ 5110.6229 COVID-19 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF CLUBHOUSE BUILDING 144.10 SPOTLIGHTS USE AT NIGHT 376591 1MLVD47667PL 5320.6211 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/RPR .19- GOLF SALES TAX ADJUST 376446 1NQ1RT4Y1MJY 5155.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE .19 GOLF SALES TAX ADJUST 376446 1NQ1RT4Y1MJY 5100.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT GOLF FUND BALANCE SHEET 83.45 MOBIL GREASE 376446 1NQ1RT4Y1MJY 5155.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 520.00 CITY HALL MICROWAVES(2) 376564 1P3VFYC17F4J 1060.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES MUNICIPAL BLDG&GROUNDS MNTC .10- GOLF SALES TAX ADJUST 376445 1VNNHCM1 FLHX 5155.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS GOLF EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE .10 GOLF SALES TAX ADJUST 376445 1VNNHCMIFLHX 5100.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT GOLF FUND BALANCE SHEET 42.80 EQUIPMENT PARTS 376445 1VNNHCMIFLHX 5155.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS GOLF EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 1,337.81 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 7/1/2020 15:38:40 Council Check Register by GL Page- 16 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 4/8/2020 - 7/3/2020 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 305595 7/1/2020 153995 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES Continued... 305596 7/1/2020 149506 ANDERSON,BRANDON 122.50 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING LICEN 376513 20200610 1510.6280 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS PW ENGINEERING&TECHNICAL 122.50 305597 7/1/2020 154253 APPLE FORD LINCOLN 115.96 REPLACE BATTERY UNIT 228 376451 494059 1765.6216 VEHICLES-TIRES/BATTERIES PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 115.96 305598 7/1/2020 100747 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES INC 48.08 COVERALLS 376579 629000004638 1710.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE PARK MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT 48.08 COVERALLS 376579 629000004638 1530.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE FLEET&BUILDINGS-CMF 96,17 COVERALLS 376579 629000004638 1600.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE STREET MANAGEMENT 48.08 COVERALLS 376580 629000006510 1710.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE PARK MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT 48.08 COVERALLS 376580 629000006510 1530.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE FLEET&BUILDINGS-CMF 96.17 COVERALLS 376580 629000006510 1600.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE STREET MANAGEMENT 384.66 305599 7/1/2020 120333 ASPENWALL TREE SERVICE INC. 398.00 FORCED DISEASE TREE REMOVAL 376515 180777 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES 398.00 305600 7/1/2020 155112 AUGUSTIN,MARK 795.00 REFUND SOFTBALL LEAGUE REG FEE 376474 202006221 1001.4356 COVID-19 RECREATION LEAGUE ENTRY FEES GENERAL FUND REVENUE 795.00 305601 7/1/2020 109954 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 8.94- CMF SALES TAX ADJUST 376520 758805 1540.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT CMF BUILDINGS&GROUNDS MNTC 8.94 CMF SALES TAX ADJUST 376520 758805 1000.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 138.94 COFFEE SERVICE 376520 758805 1540.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT CMF BUILDINGS&GROUNDS MNTC 138.94 305602 7/1/2020 151920 BLUNDETTO,DINO 35.00 1 PR JEANS D BLUMDETTO 376433 20200619 1600.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE STREET MANAGEMENT 35.00 305603 7/1/2020 121092 BOURGET IMPORTS 654.00 WINE#3 00045600 376638 170928 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 12.25 FREIGHT#3 00045600 376639 170928 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 666.25 R55CKR2 LC I CITYOFAPPL EY 7/1/20 38:40 ‘ Council Check Register by GL Page- 17 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 4/8/2020 - 7/3/2020 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 305603 7/1/2020 121092 BOURGET IMPORTS Continued... 305604 7/1/2020 100152 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MIN WINE 238.00 WINE#2 00001930 376668 1081139860 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 4.60 FREIGHT#2 00001930 376669 1081139860 5055.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 1,125.50 LIQ#2 00001930 376649 1081141879 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 99.90 TAX#2 00001930 376650 1081141879 5055.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 10.35 FREIGHT#2 00001930 376651 1081141879 5055.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 5,511.52 LIQ#1 00001930 376640 1081141880 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 171.00 TAX#1 00001930 376641 1081141880 5015.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 59.99 FREIGHT#1 00001930 376642 1081141880 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 6,380.76 LIQ#3 00001930 376654 1081142505 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 152.72- CMLIQ#3 00001930 376655 1081142505 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 167.20 TAX#3 00001930 376656 1081142505 5085.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 60.95 FREIGHT#3 00001930 376657 1081142505 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 56.00 WINE#3 00001930 376674 1081144729 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 988.43 LIQ#3 00001930 376658 1081144730 5085_6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 6.52 FREIGHT#3 00001930 376659 1081144730 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 440.44 WINE#3 00001930 376675 1081144731 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 6.90 FREIGHT#3 00001930 376676 1081144731 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 720.00 WINE#3 00001930 376677 1081144733 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 5.75 FREIGHT#3 00001930 376678 1081144733 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 132.70 WINE#3 00001930 376679 1081144739 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES .96 FREIGHT#3 00001930 376680 1081144739 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 1,005.13 LIQ#1 00001930 376643 1081144928 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 10.07 FREIGHT#1 00001930 376644 1081144928 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 1,155.80 WINE#1 00001930 376663 1081144929 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 12.65 FREIGHT#1 00001930 376664 1081144929 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 811.50 LIQ#2 00001930 376652 1081147628 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 3.45 FREIGHT#2 00001930 376653 1081147628 5055.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 3,115.16 WINE#2 00001930 376670 1081147629 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 35.65 FREIGHT#2 00001930 376671 1081147629 5055,6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 6,389.23 LIQ#1 00001930 376645 1081147630 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 319.22- CMLIQ#1 00001930 376646 1081147630 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 154.05 TAX#1 00001930 376647 1081147630 5015.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 83.95 FREIGHT#1 00001930 376648 1081147630 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 349.16 WINE#1 00001930 376665 1081147631 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 112.00- CMWINE#1 00001930 376666 1081147631 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 4.60 FREIGHT#1 00001930 376667 1081147631 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 5,303.96 LIQ#3 00001930 376660 1081148267 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 7/1/2020 15:38:40 Council Check Register by GL Page- 18 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 4/8/2020 -- 7/3/2020 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 305604 7/1/2020 100152 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MIN WINE Continued... 132.00- CMLIQ#3 00001930 376661 1081148267 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 37.95 FREIGHT#3 00001930 376662 1081148267 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 6,317.44 WINE#3 00001930 376681 1081148268 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 44,00- CMWINE#3 00001930 376682 1081148268 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 79,35 FREIGHT#3 00001930 376683 1081148268 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 19.88- CMWINE#3 00001930 376672 2080270112 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 7.38- CMWINE#3 00001930 376673 8051603 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 40,269.37 305605 7/1/2020 155115 BUDGET EXTERIORS 31,25 APP FEE REFUND 376466 20200602 1001.4060 PERMIT-BUILDING PERMIT GENERAL FUND REVENUE 31.25 305606 7/1/2020 149899 BURNSVILLE SENIOR CENTER 117.16 MATERIALS FOR SR.EVENT 376443 30320 1920.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CENTER 117.16 305607 7/1/2020 144930 CANON 42.68 COPIER LEASE 376472 21576249 1920.6310 RENTAL EXPENSE SENIOR CENTER 47.69 COPIER LEASE 376472 21576249 1400.6310 RENTAL EXPENSE INSPECTIONS MANAGEMENT 289.01 COPIER LEASE 376472 21576249 1700.6310 RENTAL EXPENSE PARK&RECREATION MANAGEMENT 399.60 COPIER LEASE 376472 21576249 1200.6310 RENTAL EXPENSE POLICE MANAGEMENT 730.68 COPIER LEASE 376472 21576249 1030.6310 RENTAL EXPENSE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 30.09 COPIER LEASE 376472 21576249 5095.6310 RENTAL EXPENSE LIQUOR#3 OPERATIONS 30.09 COPIER LEASE 376472 21576249 5065.6310 RENTAL EXPENSE LIQUOR#2 OPERATIONS 30.09 COPIER LEASE 376472 21576249 5025.6310 RENTAL EXPENSE LIQUOR#1 OPERATIONS 62.01 COPIER LEASE 376472 21576249 5105.6310 RENTAL EXPENSE GOLF MANAGEMENT 42.05 COPIER LEASE 376472 21576249 5210.6310 RENTAL EXPENSE ARENA 1 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,703.99 305608 7/1/2020 100878 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 25.36 SPECTRUM BUSINESS TV-JUNE 376530 835230604012757 1200.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS POLICE MANAGEMENT 1JUN20 86.75 SPECTRUM TV-JUNE 376432 835230604052429 5110.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS GOLF CLUBHOUSE BUILDING 8JUN20 112.11 305609 7/1/2020 151149 CHEM-AQUA,INC. 636.34 HAYES TOWER WATER TREATMENT 376539 3978793 5265.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA 2BLDGA^^INTENANCE-HAYES 636.34 R55CKR2 LaCITY OF APPLI EY 7/1/20: 38:40 Council Check Register by GL Page- 19 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 4/8/2020 — 7/3/2020 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 305609 7/1/2020 151149 CHEM-AQUA,INC. Continued... 305610 7/1/2020 100510 CORE&MAIN 423.35 WELL#2 FLUSH LINE 376576 M418059 5320.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/RPR 423.35 . 305611 7/1/2020 100123 DAKOTA COUNTY FINANCIAL SERVIC 7,485.00 DBB OPERATIONS SERVICES 376504 38309 1030.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 7,485.00 305612 7/1/2020 120609 DAUBANTON,BRUCE J 70.00 2 PR JEANS-B DAUBANTON 376452 20200611 1060.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE MUNICIPAL BLDG&GROUNDS MNTC 118.39 BOOTS-B DAUBANTON 376452 20200611 1060.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE MUNICIPAL BLDG&GROUNDS MNTC 188.39 305613 7/1/2020 120698 DURAND MANUFACTURING 375.00 4.5 INCH HYDRANT DIFFUSER 376435 28722 5330.6211 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT WTR MAIN/HYDRANT/CURB STOP MNT 375.00 305614 7/1/2020 145240 ECOLAB PEST ELIM DIV 36.03 EDU BLDG-PEST CONTROL 376524 9480174 2092.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES EDUCATION BUILDING FUND 36.03 305615 7/1/2020 100166 FEDEX 33.22 FEDEX CHARGES 376442 703477392 5115.6424 GOLF FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE GOLF PRO SHOP 12.79 GOLF FREIGHT 376535 704100827 5115.6424 GOLF FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE GOLF PRO SHOP 46.01 305616 7/1/2020 100711 GIRARDS BUSINESS SOLUTIONS,INC 3,775.00 FOLDING MACHINE 376505 93243 4002.6740 2019157G CAPITAL OUTLAY-MACH/EQUIP/OTHE MUNICIPAL BUILDINGS 3,775.00 305617 7/1/2020 155113 GONDECK,RON 795=00 REFUND SOFTBALL LEAGUE REG FEE 376475 202006222 1001.4356 COVID-19 RECREATION LEAGUE ENTRY FEES GENERAL FUND REVENUE 795=00 305618 7/1/2020 101328 GOVCONNECTION INC 2,008.85 CONFERENCE CAMS(2) 376469 70044021 1030.6725 CAPITAL OUTLAY-OFFICE EQUIP INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 1,207.99 LAPTOP COMPUTER W/DOCK(1) 376542 70089743 1700.6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES PARK&RECREATION MANAGEMENT 3,216.84 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 7/1/2020 15:38:40 Council Check Register by GL Page- 20 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 4/8/2020 -- 7/3/2020 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 305619 7/1/2020 137790 GOVERNMENTJOBS.COM INC Continued... 6,054.63 SUBSCRIPTION FEE 2020 376536 INV14625 1020.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES 6,054,63 305620 7/1/2020 100827 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 200.00 WINE#3 00032379 376691 2530255 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 2,352.00 WINE#1 00032379 376684 2534365 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 28.00 FREIGHT#1 00032379 376685 2534365 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 672.00 WINE#2 00032379 376686 2534366 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 10.00 FREIGHT#2 00032379 376687 2534366 5055.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 2,604.00 WINE#3 00032379 376692 2534367 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 31.00 FREIGHT#3 00032379 376693 2534367 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 1,116.00 WINE#3 00032379 376688 79869 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 704.00 WINE#3 00032379 376689 80343 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 11.25 FREIGHT#3 00032379 376690 80343 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 7,728.25 305621 7/1/2020 112352 GREG LESSMAN SALES 11.70 GOLF FREIGHT 376534 68254 5115.6424 GOLF FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE GOLF PRO SHOP 254_64 GRIPS FOR RESALE 376534 68254 5115.6418 GOLF-PRO SHOP OTHER GOLF PRO SHOP 266.34 305622 7/1/2020 154935 HARRIS,KELSIE 52.00 REFUND LITTLE CHEFS REG(X4) 376532 2004399002 1001.4351 COVID-19 PRE SCHOOL PROGRAMS GENERAL FUND REVENUE 52,00 305623 7/1/2020 101169 HAWKINS,INC. 543.03 DISENFECTION CHEMICALS 376552 4726211 5325.6214 CHEMICALS WATER TREATMENT FCLTY MNTC/RPR 543.03 305624 7/1/2020 118232 JOHN DEERE FINANCIAL 49.95 HAND TRIMMER 376517 P23172 1540.6211 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT CMF BUILDINGS&GROUNDS MNTC Supplier 100608 FRONTIER AG&TURF 49.95 305625 7/1/2020 147560 KEYLAND HOMES 2,000.00 NRMP 15591 FAIRFIELD DR 376506 20200622 4900.2420 NRMP FIN GUAR-DEVELOPER DEP PHYSICAL IMPROV ESCROW BAL SHT 2,000.00 NRMP 15638 FAIRFIELD DR 376507 20200622A 4900.2420 NRMP FIN GUAR-DEVELOPER DEP PHYSICAL IMPROV ESCROW BAL SHT 4,000.00 305626 7/1/2' 155023 KFI ENGINEERS R55CKR2 LC, I CITY OF APPL EY 7/1/20 38:40 Council Check Register by GL Page- 21 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 4/8/2020 -- 7/3/2020 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 305626 7/1/2020 155023 KFI ENGINEERS Continued... 2,500.00 EDU BLDG-HVAC UPGRADE 376593 47537 2092.6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES EDUCATION BUILDING FUND 2,500.00 305627 7/1/2020 155108 KOS,RYAN 130,00 UB REFUND 5671 139TH STREET CT 376540 20200619B 5301.4997 WATER/SEWER ACCT REFUNDS WATER&SEWER FUND REVENUE 130.00 305628 7/1/2020 154223 LIGHTNING DISPOSAL,INC. 203.74 STREETS COST YARD DUMPSTER 376465 69901 1600.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVSTREET MANAGEMENT 203.74 PARKS COST YARD DUMPSTER 376465 69901 1720.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVPARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE 407.48 305629 7/1/2020 155116 LIVE WIRE ELECTRICAL SERVICES LLC 1.00 PARTIAL REFUND 13889 FINDLAY 376460 20200611 1001.4072 STATE SURTAX COLLECTED GENERAL FUND REVENUE 28.05 PARTIAL REFUND 13889 FINDLAY 376460 20200611 1001.4924 ELECTRICAL PERMIT GENERAL FUND REVENUE 29.05 305630 7/1/2020 101616 LMC INSURANCE TRUST 2,181.58 WC DED J PETERSON JUN 2020 376487 15917 7205.6315 WORKERS COMP-DEDUCTIBLE INSURANCE CLAIMS 967.30 WC DED K SCHULTZ JUN 2020 376488 15919 7205.6315 WORKERS COMP-DEDUCTIBLE INSURANCE CLAIMS 1,145.53 WC DED D FRY JUN 2020 376485 15928 7205.6315 WORKERS COMP-DEDUCTIBLE INSURANCE CLAIMS 621.17 WC DED P CASPERSON JUN 2020 376486 15937 7205.6315 WORKERS COMP-DEDUCTIBLE INSURANCE CLAIMS 424.99 WC DED L FREY JUN 2020 376484 15953 7205.6315 WORKERS COMP-DEDUCTIBLE INSURANCE CLAIMS 221.17 WC DED L TRIER JUN 2020 376583 16017A 7205.6315 WORKERS COMP-DEDUCTIBLE INSURANCE CLAIMS 681.75 WC DED C CHRISTIANSON JUN 2020 376490 16021 7205.6315 WORKERS COMP-DEDUCTIBLE INSURANCE CLAIMS 908.55 WC DED C KOPESKY JUN 2020 376489 16039 7205.6315 WORKERS COMP-DEDUCTIBLE INSURANCE CLAIMS 10,000.00 CLAIM GL99481-JAY SENNE 376501 5899 7205.6399 OTHER CHARGES INSURANCE CLAIMS 17,152.04 305631 7/1/2020 138342 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 7,377.11 DIESEL SPOT(6003 GA) 376547 874185 1000.1525 INVENTORY-DIESEL FUEL GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 7,377.11 305632 7/1/2020 155114 MDS REMODELING LLC 15.50 PARTIAL REFUND 7905 LOWER 139 376459 20200520 1001.4072 STATE SURTAX COLLECTED GENERAL FUND REVENUE 292.25 PARTIAL REFUND 7905 LOWER 139 376459 20200520 1001.4060 PERMIT-BUILDING PERMIT GENERAL FUND REVENUE 307.75 305633 7/1/2020 100309 MENARDS 172.56 SIGN PLANTER PAINTING 376437 81181 1720.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 7/1/2020 15:38:40 Council Check Register by GL Page- 22 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 4/8/2020 - 7/3/2020 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 305633 7/1/2020 100309 MENARDS Continued... 4.01 IRRIGATION PARTS 376482 81247 1940.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS AQUATIC SWIM CENTER 11.75 IRRIGATION PARTS 376428 81248 1610.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET/BOULEVARD REPAIR&MNTC 173.29 CRACK SEAL LIFT 3 376590 81250 5380.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES SEWER LIFT STN REPAIR&MNTC 23,98 FOR BASE PEG MARKERS 376440 81312 1715.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARKATHLETIC FIELD MAINTENANC 402.41 TURF RESTORATION-PATCH 376554 81313- 1610.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET/BOULEVARD REPAIR&MNTC 124.62 BENCH REPAIRS 376438 81315E 1720.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE 15.80 4 1/2"METAL CUTTING 1/16 376439 81316 1720.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE 122.48 RPL LIGHT AND MATERIALS 376587 81317 5375.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES SEWER MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR 147.04 CONCRETE SEALER LIFT 3 AND CMF 376589 81329 5380.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES SEWER LIFT STN REPAIR&MNTC 4.49 MARKING PAINT 376463 81645 1720.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE 8.01- GOLF USE TAX 376538 81701 5100.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT GOLF FUND BALANCE SHEET 8.01 GOLF USE TAX 376538 81701 5145.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF SHOP BUILDING MAINTENANCE 116.44 LUMBER,MISC SUPPLIES 376538 81701 5145.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF SHOP BUILDING MAINTENANCE 47.92 TOUCHLESS FAUCET 376592 81744 1060.6229 COVID-19 GENERAL SUPPLIES MUNICIPAL BLDG&GROUNDS MNTC 1,366.79 305634 7/1/2020 154712 OFFICETEAM 1,414.00 ROBERT HALF WEEK ENDED 6-12-20 376473 55950200 1100.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES DEV MANAGEMENT 1,414.00 305635 7/1/2020 150933 PARLEY LAKE WINERY 162,00 WINE#3 00052230 376694 17895 5085,6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 162_00 305636 7/1/2020 100372 PAUSTIS&SONS 1,605.20 WINE#3 00001291 376699 92863 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 20,00 FREIGHT#3 00001291 376700 92863 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 1,246.00 WINE#1 00001291 376695 93218 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 21.25 FREIGHT#1 00001291 376696 93218 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 563.80 WINE#1 00001291 376697 93607 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 7.50 FREIGHT#1 00001291 376698 93607 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 3,463.75 305637 7/1/2020 155067 PETERS,AMY 165.00 REFUND DAY CAMP REG FEE(X3) 376531 2004396002 1001.4350 COVID-19 SUMMER PLAYGROUND ACTIVITIES GENERAL FUND REVENUE 165.00 305638 7/1/2020 143336 PREMIER LOCATING INC 615,04 GSOC ELECT.LOCATES 6-2/6-15 376572 41027 5805.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES STREET LIGHT I ITILITY FUND 615.04 R55CKR2 LC 1 CITY OF APPL EY 7/1/20 38:40 Council Check Register by GL Page- 23 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 4/8/2020 - 7/3/2020 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 305638 7/1/2020 143336 PREMIER LOCATING INC Continued... 305639 7/1/2020 111665 PRZYBYLSKI,JOSEPH E 39.19 2 PR JEANS-J PRZYBYLSKI 376434 20200616 1600.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE STREET MANAGEMENT 39.19 305640 7/1/2020 111374 RAMY TURF PRODUCTS 277.50 BLVD REPAIR 376429 OP7057106 1610_6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET/BOULEVARD REPAIR&MNTC 277.50 305641 7/1/2020 101797 RCM SPECIALTIES INC 519.76 ASPHALT EMULSIFIER(178 GA) 376558 7557 1610.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET/BOULEVARD REPAIR&MNTC 519.76 305642 7/1/2020 141325 ROOTSTOCK WINE CO 379.80 WINE#3 00050755 376701 2012157 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 7.50 FREIGHT#3 00050755 376702 2012157 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 636.00 WINE#3 00050755 376703 2012250 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 6.00 FREIGHT#3 00050755 376704 2012250 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 1,029.30 305643 7/1/2020 150643 RUE 38 520.00 WINE#1 00052178 376705 8430 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 7.50 FREIGHT#1 00052178 376706 8430 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 527.50 305644 7/1/2020 153876 SAINT CROIX VINEYARDS 151.00 WINE#3 00052556 376707 338 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 151.00 305645 7/1/2020 154757 SECURITAS ELECTRONIC SECURITY INC .47- GOLF SALES TAX ADJUST 376447 7000590972 5110.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GOLF CLUBHOUSE BUILDING .47 GOLF SALES TAX ADJUST 376447 7000590972 5100.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT GOLF FUND BALANCE SHEET 196.05 GOLF ALARM JULY-SEPT 376447 7000590972 5110.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GOLF CLUBHOUSE BUILDING 6.00- AVCC SALES TAX ADJUST 376483 7000590973 1900.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES AV COMMUNITY CENTER 6.00 AVCC SALES TAX ADJUST 376483 7000590973 1000.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 90.15 AVCC ALARM-JULY-SEPT 376483 7000590973 1900.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES AV COMMUNITY CENTER 286.20 305646 7/1/2020 111161 SHRED IT USA LLC 19.39 SHRED IT 376461 8129956653 1510.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVPW ENGINEERING&TECHNICAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 7/1/2020 15:38:40 Council Check Register by GL Page- 24 Council Check Register by Invoice 8 Summary 4/8/2020 — 7/3/2020 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 305646 7/1/2020 111161 SHRED IT USA LLC Continued... 19.39 SHRED IT 376461 8129956653 1100,6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVDEV MANAGEMENT 58.18 SHRED IT 376461 8129956653 1400.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVINSPECTIONS MANAGEMENT 96.96 305647 7/1/2020 154984 SINNOTT,HEATHER 5.00 REFUND PLAYGROUND REG FEE 376529 2004395002 1001.4350 COVID-19 SUMMER PLAYGROUND ACTIVITIES GENERAL FUND REVENUE 5.00 305648 7/1/2020 100439 SKB ENVIRONMENTAL 3,564.93 SWEEPINGS DISPOSAL(127.89)T 376569 RI63078 5505.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVSTORM DRAIN MNTC/RPR/SUMPS 3,564.93 305649 7/1/2020 146181 SMSC ENTERPRISES 78.00 BLACK DIRT 376499 SALES0000000061 1610.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET/BOULEVARD REPAIR&MNTC 01 78.00 305650 7/1/2020 155056 STEPHENSON,SAMANTHA 55,00 REFUND DAY CAMP REG FEE 376533 2004398002 1001.4350 COVID-19 SUMMER PLAYGROUND ACTIVITIES GENERAL FUND REVENUE 55.00 305651 7/1/2020 100470 TIME SQUARE SHOPPING CENTER II 1,561.02 LIQ1 CAM ESCROW-JULY 376334 20200622 5025.6310 RENTAL EXPENSE LIQUOR#1 OPERATIONS 1,721.47 LIQ1 TAX ESCROW-JULY 376334 20200622 5025.6310 RENTAL EXPENSE LIQUOR#1 OPERATIONS 11,500.00 LIQ1 LEASE-JULY 376334 20200622 5025.6310 RENTAL EXPENSE LIQUOR#1 OPERATIONS 14,782.49 305652 7/1/2020 147460 TRADITION WINE&SPIRITS 810.17 LIQ#3 00051881 376708 22765 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 12.00 FREIGHT#3 00051881 376709 22765 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 822.17 305653 7/1/2020 100478 TRANS ALARM INC 183.00 ALARM SERVICE 376739 95083677 5110.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GOLF CLUBHOUSE BUILDING 183.00 305654 7/1/2020 101587 TWIN CITY WATER CLINIC INC 250.00 WATER TESTING 376508 14608 2027.6810 2020101R CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS ROAD ESCROW 250.00 WATER TESTING 376509 14620 2027.6810 2020101R CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS ROAD ESCROW 500.00 R55CKR2 LC 1 CITY OF APPL EY 7/1/20 38:40 Council Check Register by GL Page- 25 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 4/8/2020 - 7/3/2020 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 305654 7/1/2020 101587 TWIN CITY WATER CLINIC INC Continued... 305655 7/1/2020 151947 W S&D PERMIT SERVICE 1.00 PARTIAL REFUND 7943 LOWER HAML 376444 20200505 1001.4072 STATE SURTAX COLLECTED GENERAL FUND REVENUE 81.64 PARTIAL REFUND 7943 LOWER HAML 376444 20200505 1001.4060 PERMIT-BUILDING PERMIT GENERAL FUND REVENUE 82.64 305656 7/1/2020 100081 WASTE MANAGEMENT-BURNSVILLE LANDFILL 667.30 PARKS TRASH 376470 3423802911 1720.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVPARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE 667.30 305657 7/1/2020 100521 WINE MERCHANTS 400.00 WINE#1 00022992 376731 7285855 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 96.00 WINE#1 00022992 376732 7287115 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 516.00 WINE#3 00022992 376735 7287116 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 420.00 WINE#3 00022992 376736 7287117 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 416.00 WINE#1 00022992 376733 7287991 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 351.00 WINE#3 00022992 376737 7287992 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 60.00 WINE#1 00022992 376734 7288831 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 1,800.00 WINE#3 00022992 376738 7288832 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 4,059.00 20200448 4/22/2020 148841 FURTHER 800.00 PARTICIPANT FEES-APR 2020 376599 15461426 7205,6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES INSURANCE CLAIMS 800.00 20200449 4/8/2020 148841 FURTHER 405.00 FLEX SPENDING DAYCARE 376602 39395092 9000.2119 ACCRUED FLEX SPENDING PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET 405.00 20200550 5/22/2020 148841 FURTHER 792.50 PARTICIPANT FEES-MAY 2020 376600 15474081 7205.6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES INSURANCE CLAIMS 792.50 20200643 6/29/2020 148841 FURTHER 209,198.34 HSA EMPLOYER FUNDING 376594 20200629 9000.2125 ACCRUED HSA/HRA BENEFIT PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET 209,198.34 20200644 6/29/2020 148841 FURTHER 38,397.49 HRA EMPLOYER FUNDING 376595 20200629A 9000.2125 ACCRUED HSA/HRA BENEFIT PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET 38,397.49 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 7/1/2020 15:38:40 Council Check Register by GL Page- 26 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 4/8/2020 — 7/3/2020 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 20200644 6/29/2020 148841 FURTHER Continued... 20200645 6/29/2020 148841 FURTHER 405.00 FLEX SPENDING DAYCARE 376596 39474194 9000.2119 ACCRUED FLEX SPENDING PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET 405.00 20200646 6/24/2020 148841 FURTHER 796.50 PARTICIPANT FEES-JUN 2020 376598 15486726 7205.6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES INSURANCE CLAIMS 796.50 20200647 6/23/2020 142866 HEALTHPARTNERS 5.30 NEW HIRE B SKOK FAMILY COV 376601 97251867 7105.6146 DENTAL INSURANCE INSURANCE TRUST DENTAL 1,213.70 DENTAL 376601 97251867 7105.6146 DENTAL INSURANCE INSURANCE TRUST DENTAL 1,830.00 NEW HIRE B SKOK FAMILY COV MED 376601 97251867 9000.2115 ACCRUED MEDICAL INSURANCE PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET 8,448.00 REINSTATED C CURTIS EMPLOYEE& 376601 97251867 9000.2115 ACCRUED MEDICAL INSURANCE PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET 234.935.00 MEDICAL 376601 97251867 9000.2115 ACCRUED MEDICAL INSURANCE PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET 246,432.00 979,427.00 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Checks 146,241.24 EFT Payments 497,226.83 A/P ACH Payment 335,958.93 Total Payments 979,427.00 CITY OF APPL EY 7/1/20 38:50 R55CKS2 LO J Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 1 4/8/2020 - 7/3/2020 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 76,281.36 02025 ROAD ESCROW FUND 8,904.54 02090 PARTNERS IN EDUCATION 3,485.07 02095 CENTRAL VILLAGE PARKING LOT 57.75 04000 MUNICIPAL BUILDING FUND 38,364.99 04500 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 27,043,00 04900 PHYSICAL IMPROVEMENTS ESCROW F 4,000.00 05000 LIQUOR FUND 88,057.36 05100 GOLF FUND 6,319.04 05200 ARENA FUND 2,440.80 05300 WATER&SEWER FUND 35,722.13 05500 STORM DRAINAGE UTILITY FUND 13,943.70 05600 CEMETERY FUND LEVEL PROGRAM 632.26 05800 STREET LIGHT UTIL FUND 67,692.04 07100 INSURANCE TRUST DENTAL FUND 1,219.00 07200 RISK MANAGEMENT/INSURANCE FUND 19,541.04 07300 VERMILL WrRSHD FUND LEVEL PROG 1,785,13 07440 VERF-STREETS 90,318.96 09000 PAYROLL CLEARING FUND 493,618.83 Report Totals 979,427.00 11, r R55CKR2 LC. 1 CITY OF APPL .EY 7/8/2C :02:17 Council Check Register by GL Page- 1 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 6/1/2020 - 7/10/2020 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 21987 7/10/2020 153092 ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTEGRATION 12,211,01 MC LOWER LEVEL VIDEO 377015 1612 4002.6810 2019157G CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS MUNICIPAL BUILDINGS 12,211.01 21988 7/10/2020 147056 AGAPE MECHANICAL 342.50 HAYES DEHUMIDIFIER REPAIR 376758 85940 5265.6266 REPAIRS-BUILDING ARENA 2 BLDG MAINTENANCE-HAYES 342.50 21989 7/10/2020 147438 ARBITRAGE GROUP INC,THE 1,000.00 ARBITRAGE CALC 2015E PARK BOND 376776 83884 3397.6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES GO PARK BOND 2015B$5,860,000 1,000.00 21990 7/10/2020 100054 BAUER BUILT INC 196.16 TIRES#354 376984 180261853 1630.6216 VEHICLES-TIRES/BATTERIES STREET EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 196.16 21991 7/10/2020 142897 BOLTON&MENK,INC, 2,891.00 CONSTRUCTION STAKING 376966 250710 2027.6235 2019101R CONSULTANT SERVICES ROAD ESCROW 41,770.00 DESIGN 377004 252195 4502.6235 2020134G CONSULTANT SERVICES IMPROVEMENTS-ASSESSED 12,944.00 CONSTRUCTION STAKING 377005 252196 2027.6235 2020101R CONSULTANT SERVICES ROAD ESCROW 628.00 CONSTRUCTION STAKING 377006 252197 2027.6235 2020105G CONSULTANT SERVICES ROAD ESCROW 1,487.00 CONSTRUCTION ADMIN 377010 252198 4502.6235 2018116G CONSULTANT SERVICES IMPROVEMENTS-ASSESSED 4,692.00 CONSTRUCTION STAKING 377011 252199 4502.6235 2019'107G CONSULTANT SERVICES IMPROVEMENTS-ASSESSED 4,632.50 FEASIBILITY REPORT 377009 252200 4502.6235 2019139G CONSULTANT SERVICES IMPROVEMENTS-ASSESSED 16,071.50 DESIGN 377007 252202 4502.6235 2020135G CONSULTANT SERVICES IMPROVEMENTS-ASSESSED 6,069_50 DESIGN 377008 252206 4502.6235 2020136G CONSULTANT SERVICES IMPROVEMENTS-ASSESSED 91,185_50 21992 7/10/2020 100102 COLLEGE CITY BEVERAGE 16.38- CMBEER#1 00000114 376822 54900374 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 3,126.70 BEER#2 00000114 376830 70301306 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 3,713.20 BEER#2 00000114 376838 70301403 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 116,00 BEER#1 00000114 376812 72302045 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 7,210.75 BEER#1 00000114 376813 72302065 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 43.85 TAX#1 00000114 376814 72302065 5015.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 21.99 NTAX#1 00000114 376815 72302065 5015.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 31.30- CMBEER#1 00000114 376816 72302066 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 346,40 BEER#2 00000114 376828 72302067 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 365.05- CMBEER#2 00000114 376829 72302067 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 9,545.55 BEER#3 00000114 376841 72302068 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 109.45 TAX#3 00000114 376842 72302068 5085.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 7/8/2020 16:02:17 Council Check Register by GL Page- 2 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 6/1/2020 -- 7/10/2020 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 21992 7/10/2020 100102 COLLEGE CITY BEVERAGE Continued... 552.20 BEER#3 00000114 376839 72302069 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 630.40- CMBEER#3 00000114 376840 72302069 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 14,095.95 BEER#1 00000114 376817 72302094 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 39.20 TAX#1 00000114 376818 72302094 5015.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 21.99 NTAX#1 00000114 376819 72302094 5015.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 137.90 BEER#1 00000114 376820 72302095 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 317.10- CMBEER#1 00000114 376821 72302095 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 4,348.05 BEER#2 00000114 376831 72302096 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 46.45 TAX#2 00000114 376832 72302096 5055.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 8,706.10 BEER#3 00000114 376845 72302099 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 134.85 TAX#3 00000114 376846 72302099 5085.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 21.99 NTAX#3 00000114 376847 72302099 5085.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 137.90 BEER#3 00000114 376843 72302100 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 211.67- CMBEER#3 00000114 376844 72302100 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 13,098.53 BEER#1 00000114 376823 72302128 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 85.65 TAX#1 00000114 376824 72302128 5015.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 21.99 NTAX#1 00000114 376825 72302128 5015.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 2,794.78 BEER#2 00000114 376835 72302129 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 19.60 TAX#2 00000114 376836 72302129 5055.5540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 42.05 BEER#2 00000114 376833 72302130 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 64,25- CMBEER#2 00000114 376834 72302130 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 7,948.10 BEER#3 00000114 376848 72302131 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 24.25 TAX#3 00000114 376849 72302131 5085.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 43.98 NTAX#3 00000114 376850 72302131 5085.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 9,299.93 BEER#1 00000114 376826 72302152 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 161.64 TAX#1 00000114 376827 72302152 5015.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 72.05- CMBEER#2 00000114 376837 72302153 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 9,537.55 BEER#3 00000114 376854 72302154 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 46.60 TAX#3 00000114 376855 72302154 5085.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 98.50 BEER#3 00000114 376651 72302155 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 218.33- CMBEER#3 00000114 376852 72302155 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 12.13- CMTAX#3 00000114 376853 72302155 5085.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 60.00 BEER#3 00000114 376856 72302169 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 93,820.96 21993 7/10/2020 145163 EMERGENCY RESPONSE SOLUTIONS 1,055.73 CO MONITORS(4) 376795 15495 1330.6211 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT FIRE OPERATIONS 1,055.73 21994 7/10/ 100157 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS CO R55CKR2 LC. 1 CITYOFAPPL .EY 7/8/2C 02:17 Council Check Register by GL Page- 3 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 6/1/2020 - 7/10/2020 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 21994 7/10/2020 100157 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS CO Continued... 41.44 FIRE TRUCK OIL FILTERS 376978 16438490 1350.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS FIRE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 95.81 AIR&FUEL FILTERS#338 376974 16439827 1630.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS STREET EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 22.61 FILTER#4981 376977 16439999 1350.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS FIRE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 22.74 AIR COMPRESSOR FILTERS 376987 16442183 1540.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS CMF BUILDINGS&GROUNDS MNTC 24.95 MOWER FILTERS 376987 16442183 1765.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 69_90 FIRE TRUCK FILTERS 376987 16442183 1350.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS FIRE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 173.73 OIL,AIR,HYDRAULIC FILTERS 376987 16442183 1630.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS STREET EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 9.26 OIL FILTER#941 376985 16442964 1210.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS POLICE FIELD OPERATIONS/PATROL 10.53 FILTERS PARKS TORO MOWERS 376986 16442965 1765.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 68.06 FILTERS F550 376983 75380118 1630.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS STREET EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 33.75 OIL FILTERS F550 TRUCKS 376975 75380132 1630.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS STREET EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 3.51 TORO MOWER FILTER 376988 75380411 1765.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 576.29 21995 7/10/2020 120313 FASTENAL COMPANY 113.42 BIT AND WALL ANCHORS 376957 MNLAK176401 1730.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE 113.42 21996 7/10/2020 100209 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL 1.113.75 LOCATES-JUNE 377013 60182 5305.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS WATER MGMT/REPORT/DATA ENTRY 1,113.75 21997 7/10/2020 103314 INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS 30_48 PENCILS PENS NOTE PADS 376951 IN3014610 1500.6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES PW MANAGEMENT 56_66 CORK BOARD&CARD HOLDER 376951 IN3014610 1600.6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES STREET MANAGEMENT 21.25 PACKING TAPE SUPPLY RM 376752 IN3014733 1035.6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES FINANCE 127.00 25 BINDERS-COMM DEV 376752 IN3014733 1100.6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES DEV MANAGEMENT 153.81 LABELS FOR ELECTIONS 376752 IN3014733 1015.6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS 283.84 CLEANING SUPPLIES 376965 IN3017218 1060.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES MUNICIPAL BLDG&GROUNDS MNTC 1,039.08 COMPOSTABLE CUPS/PLATES 376965 IN3017218 1060.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES MUNICIPAL BLDG&GROUNDS MNTC 53.15 ELECTION LABELS&TRAYS 376760 IN3018477 1015.6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS 13,608.47 FURNITURE ADMIN 377016 IN3019039 4802.6740 2019157G CAPITAL OUTLAY-MACH/EQ/OTHER CABLE TV-CAPITAL PROJ FUND 15,373,74 21998 7/10/2020 131791 IRRIGATION BY DESIGN INC 299.71 EDU BLDG-IRRIGATION 376950 7209 2092.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES EDUCATION BUILDING FUND 299.71 21999 7/10/2020 100289 LOGIS 250.00 NETWORK SERVICES 376994 48907 1030.6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 7/8/2020 16:02:17 Council Check Register by GL Page- 4 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 6/1/2020 - 7/10/2020 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 21999 7/10/2020 100289 LOGIS Continued... 605.00 LOGIS AVOLVE SERVER HOST JULY 376958 48945 1400.6399 OTHER CHARGES INSPECTIONS MANAGEMENT 3,356.00 LOGIS PIMS/EPERMITS JULY 376958 48945 1400.6399 OTHER CHARGES INSPECTIONS MANAGEMENT 20,884.00 LOGIS SERV/INTERNET JULY 376958 48945 1040.6399 OTHER CHARGES DATA PROCESSING 808.00 LOGIS SERV/INTERNET JULY 376958 48945 5005.6399 OTHER CHARGES LIQUOR GENERAL OPERATIONS 350.00 LOGIS SERV/INTERNET JULY 376958 48945 5205.6399 OTHER CHARGES ARENA 1 MANAGEMENT 6,945.00 LOGIS SERV/INTERNET JULY 376958 48945 5365.6399 OTHER CHARGES SEWER MGMT/REPORTS/DATA ENTRY 6,945,00 LOGIS SERV/INTERNET JULY 376958 48945 5305.6399 OTHER CHARGES WATER MGMT/REPORT/DATA ENTRY 40,143.00 22000 7/10/2020 100299 MASTER ELECTRIC CO 879.81 REPAIRS WELL 11 377020 5D30047 5320.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/RPR 879.81 22001 7/1012020 100311 METRO COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SV 333.20 LEGION SAC DEFERRAL'20 INT 376777 1111938 5365.6399 OTHER CHARGES SEWER MGMT/REPORTS/DATA ENTRY 2,333.06 LEGION SAC DEFERRAL'20 PRIN 376777 1111938 5300.2335 DUE TO METCOUNCIL-SAC DEFERRAL WATER&SEWER FUND BAL SHEET 2,666.26 99nn7 7/10/2020 147490 MINNESOTA PUMP WORKS 622.49 BARNEY BRACKET REPL 376968 11127 5380.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS SEWER LIFT STN REPAIR&MNTC 622.49 22003 7/10/2020 100348 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO 283.42 EQUIPMENT PARTS 376797 126420500 5155.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS GOLF EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 283.42 22004 7/10/2020 137687 NUSS TRUCK&EQUIPMENT 122.66 TURN SIGNAL SWITCH#305 376990 7152483P 1630.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS STREET EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 122.66 22005 7/10/2020 150718 PRO-TEC DESIGN,INC 8,131.98 MC LOWER LEVEL PROJ CAMERAS 377017 96957 4002.6810 2019157G CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS MUNICIPAL BUILDINGS 8,131.98 22006 7/10/2020 122110 REINDERS INC 166.73 FLAG POLES 376798 307161900 5150.6229 COVID-19 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF COURSE MAINTENANCE 166.73 22007 7/10/2020 144815 RIHM KEN WORTH 74.00 BRAKE CHAMBER#310 376972 2060871A 1630.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS STREET EQUIP MAINTENANCE R55CKR2 LC. 1 CITYOFAPPL .EY 7/8/2C 02:17 Council Check Register by GL Page- 5 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 6/1/2020 -- 7/10/2020 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 22007 7/10/2020 144815 RIHM KENWORTH Continued... 74.00 22008 7/10/2020 145515 SCHUFT,STEVE 59.52 VACUUM CLEANER 376759 20200625 5025.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR#1 OPERATIONS 59.52 22009 7/10/2020 100524 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE NAD SPIRITS OF MN 518.91 LIQ#1 00050756 377061 1963561 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 216,00 LIQ#1 00050756 377062 1963562 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 2,756.29 LIQ#1 00050756 377063 1963563 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 3,289.50 WINE#1 00050756 377090 1963564 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 45.00 TAX#1 00050756 377064 1963565 5015.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 620.96 LIQ#3 00050756 377081 1963592 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 1,872.01 LIQ#3 00050756 377082 1963593 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 3,598.50 WINE#3 00050756 377102 1963594 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 160.00 WINE#3 00050756 377103 1963595 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 717.00 LIQ#1 00050756 377065 1965711 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 1,416.00 WINE#1 00050756 377091 1965712 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 7,367.75 LIQ#1 00050756 377066 1965713 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 102.05 TAX#1 00050756 377067 1965715 5015.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 55.50 LIQ#1 00050756 377068 1965716 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 1,836.50 LIQ#2 00050756 377076 1965717 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 1,498.00 WINE#2 00050756 377098 1965718 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 231.00 LIQ#3 00050756 377083 1965736 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 7,307.90 LIQ#3 00050756 377084 1965737 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 4,728.00 WINE#3 00050756 377104 1965738 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 158,40 LIQ#1 00050756 377069 1968152 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 1,280.00 LIQ#1 00050756 377070 1968153 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 414.00 LIQ#1 00050756 377071 1968154 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 48.10 LIQ#1 00050756 377072 1968156 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 520.00 WINE#1 00050756 377096 1968157 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 258.50 LIQ#2 00050756 377077 1968158 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 330.91 LIQ#2 00050756 377078 1968159 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 688.00 WINE#2 00050756 377099 1968160 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 1,280.00 LIQ#3 00050756 377085 1968169 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 131.15 LIQ#3 00050756 377086 1968170 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 420.00 WINE#1 00050756 377093 5058850 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 420.00 WINE#1 00050756 377094 5058851 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 420.00 WINE#1 00050756 377095 5058852 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 1,865.50 WINE#1 00050756 377092 5059292 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 7/8/2020 16:02:17 Council Check Register by GL Page- 6 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 6/1/2020 - 7/10/2020 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 22009 7/10/2020 100524 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE NAD SPIRITS OF MN Continued... 1,450.00 WINE#3 00050756 377105 5059294 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 210.00- LIQ#1 00050756 377075 9212896 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 378.00- CMWINE#1 00050756 377089 9213717 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 714.00- WINE#3 00050756 377101 9213721 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 120,00- LIQ#1 00050756 377074 9213860 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 120.00- LIQ#2 00050756 377079 9213861 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 180.00- CMLIQ#3 00050756 377087 9213867 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 81.00- CMLIQ#3 00050756 377080 9214002 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 42.00- WINE#1 00050756 377097 9215031 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 532.05- LIQ#1 00050756 377073 9215032 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 84.00- WINE#2 00050756 377100 9215033 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 13.49- LIQ#3 00050756 377088 9215035 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 45,546.89 22010 7/10/2020 118481 STONEBROOKE EQUIPMENT 315.27 CAB SHIELD/SCREEN#601 376991 58033 1520.6215 COVID-19 EQUIPMENT-PARTS NATURAL RESOURCES 315.27 22011 7/10/2020 100486 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO 700.00 RPR GARAGE DOOR WTP 376773 Z138848 5325.6266 REPAIRS-BUILDING WATER TREATMENT FCLTY MNTC/RPR 700.00 22012 7/10/2020 101123 USA BLUE BOOK 355.50 HYDRANT LUBE,FOOD GRADE 377019 274804 5330.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES WTR MAIN/HYDRANT/CURB STOP MNT 355.50 22013 7/10/2020 100496 VAN PAPER CO 230.18 BAGS#2 00008795 377106 54400900 5065.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR#2 OPERATIONS 2.30- DISCT#2 00008795 377107 54400900 5065.6333 GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS LIQUOR#2 OPERATIONS 227.88 22014 7/10/2020 121767 VARNER TRANSPORTATION 271.70 FREIGHT#1 00045995 377108 40678 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 191.40 FREIGHT#3 00045995 377118 40679 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 29.70 FREIGHT#2 00045995 377113 40680 5055.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 380.60 FREIGHT#1 00045995 377109 40694 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 309.10 FREIGHT#3 00045995 377119 40695 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 86.90 FREIGHT#2 00045995 377114 40696 5055.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 335.50 FREIGHT#1 00045995 377110 40705 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#1 STOr"PURCHASES 238.70 FREIGHT#3 00045995 377120 40706 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 ST JRCHASES R55CKR2 LC. 1 CITY OF APPL .EY 7/8/21 02:17 Council Check Register by GL Page- 7 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 6/1/2020 - 7/10/2020 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 22014 7/10/2020 121767 VARNER TRANSPORTATION Continued... 44.00 FREIGHT#2 00045995 377115 40707 5055.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 234.30 FREIGHT#1 00045995 377111 40718 5015.6550 . FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 304,70 FREIGHT#3 00045995 377121 40887 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 3,30 FREIGHT#2 00045995 377116 40888 5055.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 619,30 FREIGHT#3 00045995 377122 40897 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 606.10 FREIGHT#1 00045995 377112 40898 5015,6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 206.80 FREIGHT#2 00045995 377117 40899 5055.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 3,862.10 22015 7/10/2020 149718 WONDERLIC INC 250.00 TEST SYSTEM ANNUAL ACCESS FEE 376971 6515038 1020.6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES 250.00 305658 7/8/2020 100089 ADVANCE AUTO PARTS 30.33 AEROSOL SPRAY LUBE 376981 1594360068 1630.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 13.10 FUEL FILLER HOSE#338 376989 1594360472 1630.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS STREET EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 43.43 305659 7/8/2020 153995 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 151.96 ANTI-FATIGUE MATS 376786 1HTDQ79J3KQ6 2012,6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES CABLE TV JOINT POWERS 27.35 HOOKS 376993 1 PNFJRN3J3G1 1030.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 29.41 LABELS 376992 1R9F4JXKMKRC 1030.6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 206_17 VARIOUS CABLES&PC MOUNT 376785 1V3PHP6Q3T14 2012.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES CABLE TV JOINT POWERS 414.89 305660 7/8/2020 154253 APPLE FORD LINCOLN 291.46 BRAKES&TIE ROD#910 376973 494695 1210.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS POLICE FIELD OPERATIONS/PATROL 291.46 305661 7/8/2020 109954 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 180.01 CH COFFEE 376953 761805 1060,6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES MUNICIPAL BLDG&GROUNDS MNTC 180.01 305662 7/8/2020 155129 BROZYNSKI,HEATHER 186.29 UB REFUND 8073 UPPER 145TH ST 376754 20200625C 5301.4997 WATER/SEWER ACCT REFUNDS WATER&SEWER FUND REVENUE 186.29 305663 7/8/2020 151769 GASPERS,DUANE 59.94 2 PR JEANS-D CASPERS 376949 20200629 1600.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE STREET MANAGEMENT 59.94 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 7/8/2020 16:02:17 Council Check Register by GL Page- 8 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 6/1/2020 - 7/10/2020 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 305663 7/8/2020 151769 CASPERS,DUANE Continued... 305664 7/8/2020 100878 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 8.46 CMF CABLE TV-JUNE 376948 835230604010892 1540,6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS CMF BUILDINGS&GROUNDS MNTC 8JUN20 8.46 305665 7/8/2020 100282 CINTAS CORPORATION 120.81 TP,SOAP,TOWELS 376784 4054443614 5110.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVGOLF CLUBHOUSE BUILDING 125.00 MATS 376784 4054443614 5110.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVGOLF CLUBHOUSE BUILDING 245.81 305666 7/8/2020 130960 COLD SPRING GRANITE COMPANY 20,273.20 COLUMBARIA PURC/INSL PMT#2 376788 1529157 5605.6740 2020132G CAPITAL OUTLAY-MACH/EQ/OTHER CEMETERY 20,273.20 305667 7/8/2020 142662 CONVENTION&VISITORS BUREAU 3,307.30 LODGING TAX-MAY 2020 376778 20200626 7005.6319 REIMBURSEMENT OF REV COLL FOR LODGING TAX 3,307.30 305668 7/8/2020 129779 DAKOTA COUNTY PROPERTY TAXATIO 3,745.00 SPECIAL ASMT FEE(749 @$5) 376769 SA0001MAY2020A 5305.6399 OTHER CHARGES WATER MGMT/REPORT/DATA ENTRY 3,745.00 305669 7/8/2020 100562 DIESEL COMPONENTS INC 50.81 EXHAUST#4981 376976 D000000441 1350.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS FIRE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 50.81 305670 7/8/2020 100434 DOUGHERTY MOLENDA SOLFEST HILL 1,105.08 MENARDS-HANSON CONCRETE REDEVE 366614 184203 4502.6231 2018158G LEGAL SERVICES IMPROVEMENTS-ASSESSED 202.26 CODE VIOLATIONS-MISC 376800 189626 1050.6231 LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL GENERAL SERVICES 278.63 TMOBILE ANTENNA LEASE-VALLEYWO 376801 189627 1000.2430 20053025 ANTENNA LEASE ESCROWS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 198.00 VERIZON ANTENNA LEASE-VALLEYWO 376802 189628 1000.2430 20053026 ANTENNA LEASE ESCROWS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 202.64 CLEARWIRE ANTENNA LEASE-QUARRY 376803 189629 1000.2430 20053019 ANTENNA LEASE ESCROWS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 455.94 VERIZON-QUARRY POINT VERIZON W 376804 189630 1000.2430 20053031 ANTENNA LEASE ESCROWS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 151.98 VILLAGE POINT PLAZA 376805 189631 4502.6231 2015152G LEGAL SERVICES IMPROVEMENTS-ASSESSED 202.64 VILLAGE AT FOUNDERS CIR 2ND AD 376806 189632 4502.6231 2015156G LEGAL SERVICES IMPROVEMENTS-ASSESSED 1,101.59 TRADEMARK RENEWAL 376807 189634 1050.6231 LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL GENERAL SERVICES 325.25 APPLE WOOD POINTE SENIOR COOP T 376808 189635 4502.6231 2019146G LEGAL SERVICES IMPROVEMENTS-ASSESSED 1,899.75 AV COMMERCIAL PROJECT-SCANNELL 376809 189636 4502.6231 2019165G LEGAL SERVICES IMPROVEMENTS-ASSESSED 379.50 SEX OFFENDER RES ORDINANCE LAW 376810 189637 1055.6231 LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL PROSE G ATTORNEY R55CKR2 LC.. 1 CITY OF APPL .EY 7/8/2C :02:17 Council Check Register by GL Page- 9 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 6/1/2020 — 7/10/2020 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 305670 7/8/2020 100434 DOUGHERTY MOLENDA SOLFEST HILL Continued... 247.50 A VS M,F AND C/J.P.A, 376811 189638 1050.6231 LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL GENERAL SERVICES 6,750.76 305671 7/8/2020 142989 DURACO INC 508.56 VENTURI PIPE#354 376772 26804 1630.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS STREET EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 508.56 305672 7/8/2020 152830 DVS RENEWAL 14.25 POL LIC RENEWAL-#914 376955 20200630 1210.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS POLICE FIELD OPERATIONS/PATROL 14.25 305673 7/8/2020 100166 FEDEX 14.58 FEDEX CHARGES 377018 704704383 5115.6424 GOLF FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE GOLF PRO SHOP 14.58 305674 7/8/2020 101298 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES 1,956.00 TOUCHLESS FAUCETS COVID 19 376771 7599485 1060.6229 COVID-19 GENERAL SUPPLIES MUNICIPAL BLDG&GROUNDS MNTC 1,956.00 305675 7/8/2020 120984 FLR SANDERS,INC 6,240.00 HARDWOOD GYM FLOOR 376964 4868 1900.6266 REPAIRS-BUILDING AV COMMUNITY CENTER 6,240.00 305676 7/8/2020 102694 GERTENS 569.50 CHEMICAL TRIMMING 376961 1276612 1720.6214 CHEMICALS PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE 569,50 305677 7/8/2020 100217 GRAINGER 71.70 GRINDING WHEELS 376781 9571775304 1765.6211 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 71.70 305678 7/8/2020 101169 HAWKINS,INC. 485.00 CHLORINE 376969 4737389 5325.6214 CHEMICALS WATER TREATMENT FCLTY MNTC/RPR 1,412.40 FLOURIDE(660 GA) 377000 4738494 5325.6214 CHEMICALS WATER TREATMENT FCLTY MNTC/RPR 1,897.40 305679 7/8/2020 100242 INDEPENDENT BLACK DIRT CO 100.00 BLVD REPAIR 376764 28169 1610.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET/BOULEVARD REPAIR&MNTC 100.00 BLVD REPAIR 376763 28172 1610.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET/BOULEVARD REPAIR&MNTC 100.00 BLVD REPAIR 376762 28174 1610.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET/BOULEVARD REPAIR&MNTC R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 7/8/2020 16:02:17 Council Check Register by GL Page- 10 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 6/1/2020 - 7/10/2020 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 305679 7/8/2020 100242 INDEPENDENT BLACK DIRT CO Continued... 100.00 BLVD REPAIR 376761 28228 1610.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET/BOULEVARD REPAIR&MNTC 400.00 305680 7/8/2020 145256 INDUSTRIAL PNEUMATIC SYSTEMS 1,171.29 RPR CMF COMPRESSOR 377002 12660A 1540.6266 REPAIRS-BUILDING CMF BUILDINGS&GROUNDS MNTC 1,171.29 305681 7/8/2020 144447 IRRIGATION-CITY INC 3,647,30 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 376967 16240 2027.6810 2017109R CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS ROAD ESCROW 3,647.30 305682 7/8/2020 100255 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR 504.00- CMWINE#3 00000109 376935 103160 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 37.23- CMLIQ#3 00000109 376891 103652 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 41,40- CMWINE#3 00000109 376936 103699 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 392.00- CMLIQ#3 00000109 376896 104718 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 19.29- CMLIQ#1 00000109 376916 104971 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 110.30- CMWINE#1 00000109 376915 104972 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 19.67- CMLIQ#3 00000109 376897 104973 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 110.52- CMWINE#3 00000109 376940 105177 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 15.86- CMWINE#1 00000109 376917 105519 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 6.90- CMWINE#1 00000109 376918 105520 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 67,50 LIQ#3 UNDERPAID 00000109 376890 1575055 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 413.90 LIQ#2 00000109 376886 1580012 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 68.98- CMLIQ#2 00000109 376887 1580012 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 530.82 LIQ#1 00000109 376857 1580102 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 1,782.78 WINE#1 00000109 376912 1580103 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 172.00 LIQ#1 00000109 376858 1580104 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 1,613.75 WINE#1 00000109 376913 1580105 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 1,473.50 LIQ#1 00000109 376859 1580106 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 137,96- CMLIQ#1 00000109 376860 1580106 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 585.85 WINE#1 00000109 376914 1580107 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 2,156.49 LIQ#1 00000109 376861 1580109 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 1,664.00 LIQ#3 00000109 376892 1580110 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 5,383.52 WINE#3 00000109 376937 1580114 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 688.00 LIQ#3 00000109 376893 1580115 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 3,847.35 WINE#3 00000109 376938 1580116 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 1,777.50 LIQ#3 00000109 376894 1580117 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 624.90 WINE#3 00000109 376939 1580118 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STO'''PURCHASES 360.00 LIQ#3 00000109 376895 1580119 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 ST JRCHASES R55CKR2 LC 1 CITY OFAPPL .EY 7/8/2C :02:17 Council Check Register by GL Page- 11 - Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 6/1/2020 - 7/10/2020 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 305682 7/8/2020 100255 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR Continued... 940.80 WINE#3 00000109 376941 1581670 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 9,749.06 LIQ#1 00000109 376862 1584758 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 2,116.60 LIQ#2 00000109 376879 1584759 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 7,073.96 LIQ#3 00000109 376898 1584760 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 1,505.90 LIQ#1 00000109 376863 1584761 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 272.90 WINE#1 00000109 376919 1584762 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 337.50 LIQ#3 00000109 376899 1584763 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 701.68 WINE#3 00000109 376942 1584764 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 6,041.25 LIQ#1 00000109 376864 1584765 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 565.00 BEER#1 00000109 376865 1584765 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 51.40- CMBEER#1 00000109 376866 1584765 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 2,496.75 WINE#1 00000109 376920 1584766 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 370.00 TAX#1 00000109 376867 1584767 5015.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 56.44 WINE#2 00000109 376928 1584768 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 1,466.38 LIQ#1 00000109 376868 1584769 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 5,475.98 WINE#1 00000109 376921 1584770 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 42.95 TAX#1 00000109 376869 1584771 5015.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 58.95 NTAX#1 00000109 376870 1584771 5015.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 172.00 LIQ#2 00000109 376880 1584772 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 323.76 LIQ#2 00000109 376881 1584773 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 115.85 WINE#2 00000109 376929 1584774 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 1,633.35 LIQ#2 00000109 376882 1584775 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 431.85- CMLIQ#2 00000109 376883 1584775 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 623.45 WINE#2 00000109 376930 1584776 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 133_50 TAX#2 00000109 376884 1584777 5055.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 203.38 LIQ#2 00000109 376885 1584778 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 2,263.19 WINE#2 00000109 376931 1584779 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 992.00 LIQ#3 00000109 376900 1584780 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 529.40 LIQ#3 00000109 376901 1584781 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 2,481.64 WINE#3 00000109 376943 1584782 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 2,334.90 LIQ#3 00000109 376902 1584783 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 565.00 BEER#3 00000109 376903 1584783 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 51.40- CMBEER#3 00000109 376904 1584783 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 370.00 LIQ#3 00000109 376905 1584784 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 2,126.13 LIQ#3 00000109 376906 1584785 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 5,666.48 WINE#3 00000109 376944 1584786 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 3.54- CMWINE#3 00000109 376945 1584786 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 1,114.50 LIQ#1 00000109 376871 1585222 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 441.00 WINE#1 00000109 376922 1586837 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 7/8/2020 16:02:17 Council Check Register by GL Page- 12 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 6/1/2020 - 7/10/2020 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 305682 7/8/2020 100255 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR Continued... 780.05 LIQ#1 00000109 376872 1590047 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 90,00 WINE#1 00000109 376873 1590047 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 169.50 BEER#1 00000109 376874 1590047 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 1,656.20 WINE#1 00000109 376923 1590048 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 1,088.95 LIQ#1 00000109 376875 1590050 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 1,857,25 WINE#1 00000109 376924 1590051 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 124.15- CMWINE#1 00000109 376925 1590051 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 3,205.85 LtQ#1 00000109 376876 1590052 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 76.35- CMLIQ#1 00000109 376877 1590052 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 720.34 LIQ#1 00000109 376878 1590054 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 1,301.73 WINE#1 00000109 376926 1590055 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 76.00- CMWINE#1 00000109 376927 1590055 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 235,50 LIQ#2 00000109 376888 1590057 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 395.45 WINE#2 00000109 376932 1590058 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 323.01 LIQ#2 00000109 376889 1590059 5055,6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 99.30 WINE#2 00000109 376933 1590060 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 248.25 WINE#2 00000109 376934 1590061 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 1,723.00 LIQ#3 00000109 376907 1590062 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 314.00 LIQ#3 00000109 376908 1590063 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 1,387.80 WINE#3 00000109 376946 1590064 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 1,077.01 LIQ#3 00000109 376909 1590065 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 200.00 WINE#3 00000109 376947 1590066 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 479.70 LIQ#3 00000109 376910 1590067 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 200.01 LIQ#3 00000109 376911 1590329 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 99,777.59 305683 7/8/2020 145922 KLAUSLER,TIMOTHY WILLIAM 74.74 KLAUSLER MILEAGE JUNE 2020 376787 20200625 2012.6277 MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE CABLE TV JOINT POWERS 74.74 305684 7/8/2020 151278 KLINE,HARRY 80.49 KLINE MILEAGE JUNE 2020 376794 20200630 2012.6277 MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE CABLE TV JOINT POWERS 80.49 305685 7/8/2020 138342 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 1,895.42 FUEL UNLEADED(1500 GA) 376768 21822666 5155.6212 MOTOR FUELS/OILS GOLF EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 558.01 FUEL DIESEL(377 GA) 376963 21839656 5155.6212 MOTOR FUELS/OILS GOLF EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 695.84 FUEL UNLEADED(394 GA) 376962 21839675 5155.6212 MOTOR FUELS/OILS GOLF EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 3,149.27 R55CKR2 LC 1 CITY OF APPL EY 7/8/2C 02:17 Council Check Register by GL Page- 13 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 6/1/2020 - 7/10/2020 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 305686 7/8/2020 100309 MENARDS Continued... 52.66 SHED ANCHORS 376956 81706 1730.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE 55.04 FAC SHED ANCHORS 376775 81711 1730.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE 126.38 WALL BASE 376756 81725 1900.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES AV COMMUNITY CENTER 234.08 305687 7/8/2020 100597 MN CITY COUNTY MGMT ASSOC 187_00 MCMA MEMBERSHIP-LAWELL 376770 20200617 1010.6280 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION 187.00 305688 7/8/2020 100353 NATL LEAGUE OF CITIES 4,002.00 NLC MEMBERSHIP DUES 376774 169210 1015,6280 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS 4,002.00 305689 718/2020 154712 OFFICETEAM 1,414.00 ROBERT HALF WEEK ENDING 5/1 376996 55782767 1100.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES DEV MANAGEMENT 1,414.00 ROBERT HALF WEEK ENDING 5/8 376997 55816569 1100.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES DEV MANAGEMENT 1,414.00 ROBERT HALF WEEK ENDING 6/5 376998 55921196 1100.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES DEV MANAGEMENT 1,414.00 ROBERT HALF WEEK ENDING 6/19 376995 55978742 1100.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES DEV MANAGEMENT 1,414.00 ROBERT HALF WEEK ENDING 6/26/ 376999 56009821 1100.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES DEV MANAGEMENT 7,070,00 305690 7/8/2020 100751 PHILLIPS WINE&SPIRITS INC 493.50 LIQ#1 00000106 377026 6048582 5015,6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 680.80 WINE#1 00000106 377056 6048583 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 274.40 TAX#1 00000106 377027 6048584 5015.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 126.00 NTAX#1 00000106 377028 6048584 5015.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 432.55 LIQ#3 00000106 377046 6048585 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 188.00 LIQ#3 00000106 377047 6048586 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 568.52 WINE#3 00000106 377048 6048586 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 512,00 TAX#3 00000106 377059 6048587 5085.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 2,164,80 LIQ#1 00000106 377029 6051816 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 162.00- CMLIQ#1 00000106 377030 6051816 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 76.00 LIQ#1 00000106 377031 6051817 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 3,157.50 WINE#1 00000106 377032 6051817 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 6,00- CMWINE#1 00000106 377033 6051817 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 272.00 TAX#1 00000106 377034 6051818 5015.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 181.20 NTAX#1 00000106 377035 6051818 5015.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 1,098.00 LIQ#2 00000106 377040 6051819 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 703.00 WINE#2 00000106 377057 6051820 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 38.80 TAX#2 00000106 377041 6051821 5055.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 7/8/2020 16:02:17 Council Check Register by GL Page- 14 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 6/1/2020 -- 7/10/2020 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 305690 7/8/2020 100751 PHILLIPS WINE&SPIRITS INC Continued... 109.90 NTAX#2 00000106 377042 6051821 5055,6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 2,372,60 LIQ#3 00000106 377049 6051822 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 38,00 LIQ#3 00000106 377050 6051823 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 2,659.27 WINE#3 00000106 377051 6051823 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 245.60 TAX#3 00000106 377052 6051824 5085.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 2,389.70 LIQ#1 00000106 377036 6055467 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 1,508.69 LIQ#1 00000106 377037 6055468 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 456.00 WINE#1 00000106 377038 6055468 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 224.00 TAX#1 00000106 377039 6055469 5015.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 456.00 LIQ#2 00000106 377044 6055471 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 87.80 LIQ#2 00000106 377045 6055472 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 1,221.32 WINE#2 00000106 377058 6055473 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 656.65 LIQ#3 00000106 377053 6055474 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 1,260.69 WINE#3 00000106 377060 6055475 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 147.50 TAX#3 00000106 377054 6055476 5085.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 126.00 NTAX#3 00000106 377055 6055476 5085.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 12.79- CMLIQ#2 00000106 377043 607873 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 24,746.00 305691 7/8/2020 155110 PRECISION SIGNS&IMAGING LLC 875.00 EDU BLDG-EXT SIGN CHANGE 376766 11543 2092.6399 OTHER CHARGES EDUCATION BUILDING FUND 875.00 305692 7/8/2020 101500 PREMIUM WATERS INC 9 64 WATER 376783 317613510 5145.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF SHOP BUILDING MAINTENANCE 9.64 305693 7/8/2020 113059 RAINBOW TREECARE 9,634.13 ASH TREE INJECTIONS 2020 377012 1379633 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES 9,634.13 305694 7/8/2020 101797 RCM SPECIALTIES INC 607,36 ASPHALT EMULSIFIER(208GA) 377001 7572 1610.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET/BOULEVARD REPAIR&MNTC 607.36 305695 7/8/2020 100916 RESERVE ACCOUNT 7,500.00 FIN POSTAGE 376954 20200706 1035.6238 POSTAGE/UPS/FEDEX FINANCE 7,500.00 305696 7/8/2 154055 ROASTED PEAR R55CKR2 LC 1 CITYOFAPPL EY 7/8/20 02:17 Council Check Register by GL Page- 15 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 6/1/2020 - 7/10/2020 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 305696 7/8/2020 154055 ROASTED PEAR Continued... 1,221.74 ROASTED PEAR-F&B 90%OF SALES 376751 20200625 5115.6420 GOLF-FOOD GOLF PRO SHOP 1,221.74 305697 7/8/2020 100410 ROSEMOUNT SAW&TOOL 1.41- GOLF USE TAX 376799 290846 5100.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT GOLF FUND BALANCE SHEET 1.41 GOLF USE TAX 376799 290846 5155.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT GOLF EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 20,50 WEED WHIP REPAIR 376799 290846 5155,6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT GOLF EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 20,50 305698 7/8/2020 132465 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 18.19 PAPER TOWELS 376789 20200601 5120.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF KITCHEN 38.00 SUGAR AND CREAM 376790 20200612 5120.6420 GOLF-FOOD GOLF KITCHEN 59.24 CLEANING SUPPLIES 376790 20200612 5120.6422 GOLF-KITCHEN SUPPLIES GOLF KITCHEN 2.29- CH SALES TAX ADJUST 376791 202006150917 1060,6229 COVID-19 GENERAL SUPPLIES MUNICIPAL BLDG&GROUNDS MNTC 2.29 CH SALES TAX ADJUST 376791 202006150917 1000.2330 COVID-19 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 34.24 CLOROX WIPES,TISSUE 376791 202006150917 1060.6229 COVID-19 GENERAL SUPPLIES MUNICIPAL BLDG&GROUNDS MNTC 1.92- CH SALES TAX ADJUST 376792 202006151207 1060.6229 COVID-19 GENERAL SUPPLIES MUNICIPAL BLDG&GROUNDS MNTC 1.92 CH SALES TAX ADJUST 376792 202006151207 1000.2330 COVID-19 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 28.88 CLOROX WIPES,TISSUE 376792 202006151207 1060.6229 COVID-19 GENERAL SUPPLIES MUNICIPAL BLDG&GROUNDS MNTC 178.55 305699 7/8/2020 155106 SCHEIDT,JODIE 122.50 JODIE SCHEIDT PE LIC.RENEWAL 376765 20200616 1510.6280 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS PW ENGINEERING&TECHNICAL 122,50 305700 7/8/2020 155126 SCHUSTER,SANDRA 20.00 REFUND PLAYGROUND REG FEE(4) 376782 2004394002 1001.4350 COVID-19 SUMMER PLAYGROUND ACTIVITIES GENERAL FUND REVENUE 20.00 305701 7/8/2020 154757 SECURITAS ELECTRONIC(SEE V#100478) 6.84- FIRE SALES TAX ADJUST 376979 7000561845 1340.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES FIRE BLDG&GROUNDS MNTC 6.84 FIRE SALES TAX ADJUST 376979 7000561845 1000.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 102.84 AFS2 ALARM-JUNE-AUG 376979 7000561845 1340.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES FIRE BLDG&GROUNDS MNTC 6.84- FIRE SALES TAX ADJUST 376980 7000562041 1340.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES FIRE BLDG&GROUNDS MNTC 6.84 FIRE SALES TAX ADJUST 376980 7000562041 1000.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 102.84 AFS1 ALARM-JUNE-AUG 376980 7000562041 1340.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES FIRE BLDG&GROUNDS MNTC 205.68 305702 7/8/2020 100478 SECURITAS ELECTRONIC SECURITY INC 84.15 AVCC ALARM-JAN-MAR 376780 95083676 1900.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES AV COMMUNITY CENTER R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 7/8/2020 16:02:17 Council Check Register by GL Page- 16 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 6/1/2020 -- 7/10/2020 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 305702 7/8/2020 100478 SECURITAS ELECTRONIC SECURITY INC Continued... 18.15- LIQ1 USE TAX 376793 95083678 5000.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 18.15 LIQ1 USE TAX 376793 95083678 5025.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES LIQUOR#1 OPERATIONS 264,00 LIQ1 ALARM-JAN-DEC 376793 95083678 5025.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES LIQUOR#1 OPERATIONS 18.15- LIQ2 USE TAX 376779 95083680 5000.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 18.15 LIQ2 USE TAX 376779 95083680 5065.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES LIQUOR#2 OPERATIONS 264.00 LIQ2 ALARM-JAN-DEC 376779 95083680 5065.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES LIQUOR#2 OPERATIONS 612.15 305703 7/8/2020 100432 SEH ENGINEERS 2,415.73 FEASIBILITY REPORT 377003 387550 2027.6235 2021104G CONSULTANT SERVICES ROAD ESCROW 2,415.73 305704 7/8/2020 155128 SELECT EQUITY INVESTMENTS INC 16.74 UB REFUND 14351 GLENDA DR 376755 20200625B 5301.4997 WATER/SEWER ACCT REFUNDS WATER&SEWER FUND REVENUE 16.74 305705 7/8/2020 101305 SEMA EQUIPMENT 558.15 RPR PARTS FOR JD MOWER 376970 1413584 1630.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS STREET EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 558.15 305706 7/8/2020 144079 SPIRIT PROMOTIONS LLC 244.76 SHIRTS/PANTS 376796 1111 5025.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE LIQUOR#1 OPERATIONS 244.76 305707 7/8/2020 101587 TWIN CITY WATER CLINIC INC 660.00 WTP TESTING-JUNE 377014 14729 5325.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES WATER TREATMENT FCLTY MNTC/RPR 660.00 305708 7/8/2020 119117 US KIDS GOLF 5.38- GOLF DISCOUNT 377021 IN1403073 5115.6423 GOLF-CASH DISCOUNT GOLF PRO SHOP 16.84 FEDEX CHARGES 377021 IN1403073 5115.6424 GOLF FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE GOLF PRO SHOP 162.52 CLUBS FOR RESALE 377021 IN1403073 5115.6414 GOLF-CLUBS GOLF PRO SHOP 173.98 305709 7/8/2020 142614 USA SAFETY SUPPLY CORP 34.92 PERCENTAGE HI VIZ TSHIRTS 376952 139140 1710.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE PARK MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT 34.92 PERCENTAGE HI VIZ TSHIRTS 376952 139140 1600.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE STREET MANAGEMENT 34.92 PERCENTAGE HI VIZ TSHIRTS 376952 139140 1510.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE PW ENGINEERING&TECHNICAL 17.46 PERCENTAGE HI VIZ TSHIRTS 376952 139140 5365.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE SEWER MGMT/RFPORTS/DATA ENTRY 17.47 PERCENTAGE HI VIZ TSHIRTS 376952 139140 5305.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE WATER MGMT RT/DATA ENTRY R55CKR2 LC. 1 CITY OF APPL .EY 7/8/21 .02:17 Council Check Register by GL Page- 17 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 6/1/2020 — 7/10/2020 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No 44ccotint No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 305709 7/8/2020 142614 USA SAFETY SUPPLY CORP Continued... 139.69 305710 7/8/2020 120890 VALLEY VIEW GLASS&SCREEN 702,00 EDU BLDG-WINDOW GLASS BREAK 376767 20200624 2092.6266 REPAIRS-BUILDING EDUCATION BUILDING FUND 702.00 305711 7/8/2020 151947 W S&D PERMIT SERVICE 1.00 PRTL RFND 5379 UPPER 147 ST W 376757 20200528 1001.4072 STATE SURTAX COLLECTED GENERAL FUND REVENUE 81.64 PRTL RFND 5379 UPPER 147 ST W 376757 20200528 1001.4060 PERMIT-BUILDING PERMIT GENERAL FUND REVENUE 82.64 305712 7/8/2020 155127 WAGNER,SHARI 86.05 UB REFUND 7715 WHITNEY DR 376753 20200625A 5301.4997 WATER/SEWER ACCT REFUNDS WATER&SEWER FUND REVENUE 86.05 20200648 6/1/2020 120679 U S BANK P CARD .89- CLERK SALES TAX ADJUST 375626 240728001370833 1015.6229 COVID-19 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS 32736634 .89 CLERK SALES TAX ADJUST 375626 240728001370833 1000.2330 COVID-19 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 32736634 13.45 CLEAR VINYL 375626 240728001370833 1015.6229 COVID-19 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS 32736634 Supplier 120823 JOANN ETC#1952(PCARD) 22.66- IA1 SALES TAX ADJUST 377022 241374601331001 5210.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA 1 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 69368164 22.66 IA1 SALES TAX ADJUST 377022 241374601331001 5200.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT ARENA FUND BALANCE SHEET 69368164 340.66 SHELVING 377022 241374601331001 5210.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA 1 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 69368164 Supplier 148085 MENARDS(PCARD) 736,00 AED BATTERIES 377023 241374601331001 1200.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS POLICE MANAGEMENT 69370129 Supplier 148061 AED SUPERSTORE(PCARD) .15- GOLF SALES TAX ADJUST 376066 241374601350009 5155.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS GOLF EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 96936993 .15 GOLF SALES TAX ADJUST 376066 241374601350009 5100,2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT GOLF FUND BALANCE SHEET 96936993 82.86 CHAINS 376066 241374601350009 5155.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS GOLF EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 96936993 Supplier 148306 TRACTOR SUPPLY CO(PCARD) R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 7/8/2020 16:02:17 Council Check Register by GL Page- 18 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 6/1/2020 — 7/10/2020 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 20200648 6/1/2020 120679 U S BANK P CARD Continued... 2.01- WQ SALES TAX ADJUST 376067 241382901392860 5505.6239 PRINTING STORM DRAIN MNTC/RPR/SUMPS 00000027 2.01 WQ SALES TAX ADJUST 376067 241382901392860 5500.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT STORM DRAIN UTIL BALANCE SHEET 00000027 30.00 EROSION CONTROL HANDBOOKS 376067 241382901392860 5505.6239 PRINTING STORM DRAIN MNTC/RPR/SUMPS 00000027 Supplier 154975 U OF M BBE EROSION(PCARD) 2.24- HCSC SALES TAX ADJUST 376063 241640701330910 1920.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CENTER 16395182 2.24 HCSC SALES TAX ADJUST 376063 241640701330910 1000.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 16395182 33.67 STORAGE BINS 376063 241640701330910 1920.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CENTER 16395182 Supplier 100463 TARGET STORES(PCARD) 89.00 THROW ROPE BAG FOR 4972 376061 242107301390837 1330.6211 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT FIRE OPERATIONS 43529594 Supplier 154216 RESCUETECH1 INC(PCARD) 2.07- GOLF SALES TAX ADJUST 375606 242476001392001 5105.6239 COVID-19 PRINTING GOLF MANAGEMENT 00835073 2.07 GOLF SALES TAX ADJUST 375606 242476001392001 5100.2330 COVID-19 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT GOLF FUND BALANCE SHEET 00835073 194.06 SIGNS 375606 242476001392001 5105.6239 COVID-19 PRINTING GOLF MANAGEMENT 00835073 Supplier 154885 ALPHAGRAPHICS(PCARD) 22.56- MC LL SALES TAX ADJUST 376065 242580201360171 4002.6740 2019157G CAPITAL OUTLAY-MACH/EQUIP/OTHE MUNICIPAL BUILDINGS 21632549 22.56 MC LL SALES TAX ADJUST 376065 242580201360171 4000.2330 2019157G DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT MUNICIPAL BLDG FUND BALANCE 21632549 339 21 MC LOWER LEVEL MOVING STORAGE 376065 242580201360171 4002.6740 2019157G CAPITAL OUTLAY-MACH/EQUIP/OTHE MUNICIPAL BUILDINGS 21632549 Supplier 144237 THE WEBSTAURANT STORE(PCARD) 169.00 ROW PERMIT 375613 242707601362867 1610.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET/BOULEVARD REPAIR&MNTC 64500116 125.00 DAKOTA COUNTY ROW PERMIT 375615 242707601362867 1610.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET/BOULEVARD REPAIR&MNTC 64500124 Supplier 154594 DAKOTA COUNTY(PCARD) 99.00 AMBUSH ON-LINE TRNG-BOOTH 377025 243103301410030 1225.6275 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL POLICE TRAINING 71264071 Supplier 154973 PROFESSIONAL LAW ENFOR(PCARD) R55CKR2 LC 1 CITY OF APPL EY 7/8/2C 02:17 Council Check Register by GL Page- 19 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 6/1/2020 -. 7/10/2020 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 20200648 6/1/2020 120679 U S BANK P CARD Continued... 17.45- HCSC SALES TAX ADJUST 376057 243230001340911 1920.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CENTER 49002345 17.45 HCSC SALES TAX ADJUST 376057 243230001340911 1000.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 49002345 262.37 PLANTS FOR BACK PATIO 376057 243230001340911 1920.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CENTER 49002345 7.12- HCSC SALES TAX ADJUST 376056 243230001350911 1920.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CENTER 40005262 7.12 HCSC SALES TAX ADJUST 376056 243230001350911 1000.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 40005262 107.09 POTENTILLAS FOR BACK PATIO 376056 243230001350911 1920.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CENTER 40005262 11.77- AVCC SALES TAX ADJUST 376071 243230001400911 1900.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES AV COMMUNITY CENTER 45000410 11.77 AVCC SALES TAX ADJUST 376071 243230001400911 1000.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 45000410 176.98 DIRT&FLOWERS 376071 243230001400911 1900.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES AV COMMUNITY CENTER 45000410 Supplier 148129 PAHL'S MARKET(PCARD) 9.76 GREY PAPER 375609 244310601310833 1920.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CENTER 22423147 75.95 MAGNETIC BOARD 375608 244310601320837 1920.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CENTER 55283843 Supplier 140339 AMAZON.COM(PCARD) 56.94 WAGNER PANTS 377024 244356501377625 1200.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE POLICE MANAGEMENT 36726340 Supplier 100190 GALLS,LLC(PCARD) 3.85- UTIL SALES TAX ADJUST 376054 244538801430000 5310.6211 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT WATER METER RPR/REPLACE/READNC 15668945 3.85 UTIL SALES TAX ADJUST 376054 244538801430000 5300.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT WATER&SEWER FUND BAL SHEET 15668945 57.84 IPAD CHARGER 408 376054 244538801430000 5310.6211 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT WATER METER RPR/REPLACE/READNC 15668945 Supplier 148157 GOPHERMODS APPLE VALLEY(PCARD) 7.70- CH SALES TAX ADJUST 375619 244834701340003 1060.6211 COVID-19 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT MUNICIPAL BLDG&GROUNDS MNTC 11694947 7.70 CH SALES TAX ADJUST 375619 244834701340003 1000.2330 COVID-19 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 11694947 115.70 SNEEZE GUARD PEXIGLASS HOLDER 375619 2448347013401303 1060.6211 COVID-19 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT MUNICIPAL BLDG&GROUNDS MNTC R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 7/8/2020 16:02:17 Council Check Register by GL Page- 20 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 6/1/2020 — 7/10/2020 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 20200648 6/1/2020 120679 U S BANK P CARD Continued... 11694947 Supplier 144179 ETSY.COM(PCARD) 107.89 ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION 376062 244921501296379 1020.6280 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS HUMAN RESOURCES 45899246 Supplier 152209 SIGNUPGENIUS(PCARD) 124.60 SAFETY TRIANGLES 375618 244921501347154 1676.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREETS-SAFETY 06363382 Supplier 154726 ETRAILER CORP(PCARD) 5.12- CABLE SALES TAX ADJUST 376070 244921501357174 2012.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES CABLE TV JOINT POWERS 68081570 5.12 CABLE SALES TAX ADJUST 376070 244921501357174 2010.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT CABLE TV RESERVE BALANCE SHEET 68081570 77.00 AA BATTERIES 376070 244921501357174 2012.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES CABLE TV JOINT POWERS 68081570 Supplier 150737 OFFICESUPPLY.COM(PCARD) 30.28- IT SALES TAX ADJUST 376060 244921501428525 1030.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 57378677 30.28- HCSC SALES TAX ADJUST 376060 244921501428525 1920.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS SENIOR CENTER 57378677 60.56 IT/HCSC SALES TAX ADJUST 376060 244921501428525 1000.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 57378677 455.28 CORDLESS PHONE HANDSET 376060 244921501428525 1920.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS SENIOR CENTER 57378677 455,28 CORDLESS PHONE HANDSET 376060 244921501428525 1030.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 57378677 Supplier 139988 PAYPAL(PCARD) 9.68- AVCC SALES TAX ADJUST 375622 246104301350101 1900.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES AV COMMUNITY CENTER 95015688 9.68 AVCC SALES TAX ADJUST 375622 246104301350101 1000.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 95015688 145.52 PAINT,PARTS 375622 246104301350101 1900.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES AV COMMUNITY CENTER 95015688 Supplier 143525 HOME DEPOT STORE#2833(PCARD) 15.40- FIRE SALES TAX ADJUST 375625 246921601301000 1320.6280 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS FIRE PREVENTION 75637039 15.40 FIRE SALES TAX ADJUST 375625 246921601301000 1000.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 75637039 483.40 ICC DUES AND FIRE CODE BOOKS 375625 246921601301000 1320.6280 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS FIRE PREVENTION 75637039 R55CKR2 LC 1 CITY OFAPPL .EY 7/8/2C :02:17 Council Check Register by GL Page-: 21 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 6/1/2020 — 7/10/2020 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 20200648 6/1/2020 120679 U S BANK P CARD Continued... Supplier 100249 INTL CODE COUNCIL INC(PCARD) 10.17- CH SALES TAX ADJUST 376059 246921601331000 1540.6229 COVID-19 GENERAL SUPPLIES CMF BUILDINGS&GROUNDS MNTC 57548862 10.17 CH SALES TAX ADJUST 376059 246921601331000 1000.2330 COVID-19 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 57548862 148.11 DUST MASKS FOR COVID-19 376059 246921601331000 1540.6229 COVID-19 GENERAL SUPPLIES CMF BUILDINGS&GROUNDS MNTC 57548862 Supplier 154971 PARTNERS TOWN&COU(PCARD) 1.85- FIRE SALES TAX ADJUST 375611 246921601341007 1300.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE MANAGEMENT 60796013 1.85 FIRE SALES TAX ADJUST 375611 246921601341007 1000.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 60796013 27.85 DOOR FLAGS 375611 246921601341007 1300.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE MANAGEMENT 60796013 Supplier 140339 AMAZON.COM(PCARD) 3.60- POL SALES TAX ADJUST 375612 246921601341008 1281.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE K-9 04548859 3.60 POL SALES TAX ADJUST 375612 246921601341008 1000.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 04548859 54.13 FOOD FOR K9 DUKE 375612 246921601341008 1281.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE K-9 04548859 Supplier 153310 CHEWY.COM(PCARD) 1.21- FIRE SALES TAX ADJUST 375610 246921601371008 1300.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE MANAGEMENT 82446643 1.21 FIRE SALES TAX ADJUST 375610 246921601371008 1000.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 82446643 18.15 DOOR FLAGS PARTS 375610 246921601371008 1300.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE MANAGEMENT 82446643 Supplier 140339 AMAZON.COM(PCARD) 34.99 MONTHLY SOFTWARE SUBSCR 375627 246921601381005 1030.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 29940510 Supplier 141272 MAILCHIMP(PCARD) 21.41 SHELF LABEL HOLDERS 375607 246921601391007 5025.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR#1 OPERATIONS 69413524 42.82 SHELF LABEL HOLDERS 375607 246921601391007 5095.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR#3 OPERATIONS 69413524 Supplier 140339 AMAZON.COM(PCARD) 4.28- POOL SALES TAX ADJUST 375621 246921601411000 1930.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS REDWOOD POOL 06561677 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 7/8/2020 16:02:17 Council Check Register by GL Page- 22 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 6/1/2020 — 7/10/2020 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 20200648 6/1/2020 120679 U S BANK P CARD Continued... 4.28 POOL SALES TAX ADJUST 375621 246921601411000 1000.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 06561677 62.27 GAGES 375621 246921601411000 1930.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS REDWOOD POOL 06561677 Supplier 148266 GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL(PCARD) 301.50 FAC SHED PERMIT 375624 247170501341313 1940.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES AQUATIC SWIM CENTER 43498169 Supplier 153080 INSPECTIONS EPERMITS(PCARD) 400.00 APPLEVALLEYMN.GOV DOMAIN REG 375617 247170501391613 1030,6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 93408276 Supplier 154017 DOTGOVREGISTRATION(PCARD) 40.00 GUN PERMIT TRNG-K.SHAW 376055 248019701416908 1200.6275 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL POLICE MANAGEMENT 69317225 Supplier 148103 MN SHERIFFS ASSOC(PCARD) 14.99 MONTHLY SOFTWARE SUBSCR 375623 249064101310937 1030.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 71352187 Supplier 150048 HOOTSUITE MEDIA INC(PCARD) 7,70- CH SALES TAX ADJUST 375620 249064101320938 1060.6211 COVID-19 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT MUNICIPAL BLDG&GROUNDS MNTC 59538698 7.70 CH SALES TAX ADJUST 375620 249064101320938 1000.2330 COVID-19 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 59538698 115.70 SNEEZE GUARD PEXIGLASS HOLDER 375620 249064101320938 1060.6211 COVID-19 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT MUNICIPAL BLDG&GROUNDS MNTC 59538698 Supplier 154972 FINEDESIGNCUSTOMS(PCARD) 225.00- SHADE TREE COURSE-HAYES 376068 741382901412000 1520.6275 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL NATURAL RESOURCES 00000037 225.00- SHADE TREE COURSE-SCHAUM 376068 741382901412000 1520.6275 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL NATURAL RESOURCES 00000037 225.00- TREE COURSE-CORDES 376069 741382901422000 1600.6275 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL STREET MANAGEMENT 00000028 225.00- TREE COURSE-DUGAN 376069 741382901422000 1600.6275 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL STREET MANAGEMENT 00000028 225,00- TREE COURSE-WEIGEL 376069 741382901422000 1600.6275 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL STREET MANAGEMENT 00000028 Supplier 148118 U OF M CCE(PCARD) 169.00- DAKOTA COUNTY ROW PERMIT 375614 742707601402867 1610.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET/BOULEVARD REPAIR&MNTC 64700046 Supplier 154594 DAKOTA COUNTY(PCARD) 96.38- POTENTILLA RETURN 376058 743230001350911 1920.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CENTF'- R55CKR2 LC 1 CITY OF APPL .EY 7/8/2C :02:17 Council Check Register by GL Page- 23 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 6/1/2020 — 7/10/2020 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 20200648 6/1/2020 120679 U S BANK P CARD Continued... 40005325 6.41- HCSC SALES TAX ADJUST 376058 743230001350911 1000.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 40005325 6.41 HCSC SALES TAX ADJUST 376058 743230001350911 1920.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CENTER 40005325 Supplier 148129 PAHL'S MARKET(PCARD) 1,359.60 GPS REPEATER FOR AFS2 376064 745255101296853 1340.6266 REPAIRS-BUILDING FIRE BLDG&GROUNDS MNTC 28330421 Supplier 154974 TERRISGPS LTD(PCARD) 6,214.65 545,367.03 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Checks 217,456.10 EFT Payments 6,214.65 A/PACH Payment 321,696.28 Total Payments 545,367.03 R55CKS2 LC 0 CITY OF APPL EY 7/8/2C :02:25 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page 1. 6/1/2020 - 7/10/2020 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 79,756.39 02010 CABLE TV RESERVE FUND 590.36 02025 ROAD ESCROW FUND 22,526.03 02090 PARTNERS IN EDUCATION 1,876.71 03395 GO PARK BOND 2015B,$5,860,000 1,000.00 04000 MUNICIPAL BUILDING FUND 20,682.20 04500 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 78,407.20 04800 CABLE TV-CAPITAL PROJ FUND 13,608.47 05000 LIQUOR FUND 269,685.93 05100 GOLF FUND 5,678.02 05200 ARENA FUND 1,033.16 05300 WATER&SEWER FUND 26,912.06 05500 STORM DRAINAGE UTILITY FUND 30.00 05600 CEMETERY FUND LEVEL PROGRAM 20,273.20 07000 LODGING TAX FUND 3,307.30 Report Totals 545,367.03 • ITEM: 5.A. ..... :�. Apple COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 23, 2020 Valley SECTION: Regular Agenda Description: Wellhead Protection Plan Amendment Part One Update Staff Contact: Department/ Division: Brian Skok, Public Works Superintendent- Utilities Utilities Division ACTION REQUESTED: N/A SUMMARY: A representative from AE2S will be present at the July 23, 2020 meeting to update the City Council on the required Wellhead Protection (WHP) Plan amendment update. Attached is a report that includes and documents the results of Part 1 to an amendment of the WHP Plan for the City of Apple Valley. The current Plan includes the amended delineation of the Wellhead Protection Area (WHPA), Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA), and vulnerability assessment for the City's supply wells, except Wells No. 1 through 3, and 14 and 15, which are for emergency use only. The amended delineation was completed in accordance with the WHP Minnesota Rule (MR), parts 4720.5100 to 4720.5590. BACKGROUND: Wellhead Protection (WHP) Plans are required to be updated every ten (10) years or upon installation of a new well. The update is in the form of an amendment. The City's first WHP Plan was completed in 2003. In 2009 an amendment was required because of the addition of Well 20. A public meeting is required as part of the plan amendment process. On 7/11/2019 the City Council approved an Engineering Services proposal with Advanced Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc., (AE2S) to prepare the Wellhead Protection Plan Amendment per Minnesota Department of Health requirements. BUDGET IMPACT: The Wellhead Protection Plan Amendment is included in the 2019 and 2020 Public Works Water Utility Budget. It is also included in the 2021 proposed budget. Project 2019-140, Code: 5305.6235. ATTACHMENTS: Report Presentation Amendment to the Wellhead Protection Plan Part 1 Delineation of Wellhead Protection Area, Drinking Water Supply Management Area, and Drinking Water Supply Management Area Vulnerability Assessment April 2020 Prepared for City of Apple Valley Apple Valley,Minnesota by LRE Water Amendment to the Wellhead Protection Plan Prepared for:City of Apple Valley,Minnesota The technical material in this report was prepared by or under the supervision and direction of the undersigned,whose seal as a Professional Geologist is affixed below. e l 44.....4 . David S. Hume.PG License No.: 30488 The following members of the LRE Water staff contributed to the preparation of this report. Vice President in Charge- David S. Hume,PG Project Manager/Hydrogeologist- Roscoe Sopiwnik,GISP Project Groundwater Modeler-Jacob Bauer April—2020—5013AEN01 LRE6 WATER 0 LRE Water Table of Contents Table of Contents Table of Figures List of Tables ii Table of Appendices ii Glossary of Terms ii Acronyms iii Executive Summary iv 1 Introduction 1 2 Assessment of the Data Elements 2 3 General Descriptions 4 3.1 Descriptions of the Water Supply System 4 3.2 Descriptions of the Hydrogeologic Setting 4 4 Delineation of the Wellhead Protection Area 6 4.1 Delineation Criteria 6 4.2 Method Used to Delineate the Wellhead Protection Area 8 4.2.1 Porous Media Delineations 8 4.3 Results of Model Calibration and Sensitivity Analysis 10 4.3.1 Calibration 10 4.3.2 Sensitivity Analysis 11 4.4 Address Model Uncertainty 12 4.5 Fracture Flow Delineation 12 4.6 Conjunctive Delineation 13 5 Delineation of the WHPA and DWSMA 13 6 Vulnerability Assessments 13 6.1 Assessment of Well Vulnerability 13 6.2 Assessment of the Drinking Water Supply Management Area Sensitivity 15 6.3 Assessment of the Drinking Water Supply Management Area Vulnerability 16 7 Comparing Original Part 1 to Amended Part 1 WHPAs 16 8 Recommendations 16 9 References 17 Table of Figures Figure 1: Site Location and Model Boundary Figure 2: Bedrock Geology Figure 3: Location of City and Surrounding High-Capacity Wells within 2 Miles used in the Groundwater Flow Model Figure 4: Prairie du Chien-Jordan Potentiometric Surface Figure 5: Simulated Groundwater Equipotential Contours and Calibration Well Locations of the Prairie du Chien-Jordan Figure 6: Steady-State Model Calibration Data and Model Statistics- OPDC Figure 7: Steady-State Model Calibration Data and Model Statistics- CJDN Figure 8: 1-, 5-,and 10-Year Flowpaths and 10-Year Composite Capture Zone (Porous Flow) Wellhead Protection Area Boundaries Figure 9: Fracture Flow Delineation Boundary Figure 10: Combined Wellhead Protection Area Boundary and DWSMA Boundary Figure 11: Drinking Water Supply Management Area Geologic Sensitivity Assessment Figure 12: Drinking Water Supply Management Area Vulnerability Assessment Figure 13: 2009 and 2020 Amended Wellhead Protection Areas April-2020-5013AEN01 O WATER LRE Water 11 List of Tables Table 1: Water Supply Well Information 2 Table 2: Assessment of Data Elements 4 Table 3: Description of the Hydrogeologic Setting in Jordan Aquifer 6 Table 4: Description of WHPA Delineation Criteria 7 Table 5: Annual Volume of Water Discharged from Water Supply Wells 8 Table 6: High Capacity Wells Within 2 Miles of Well Field 9 Table 7: Isotope and Water Quality Results 15 Table of Appendices Appendix A: Hydrogeologic Cross Sections- 2009 Amendment Appendix B: Fracture Flow Analysis Appendix C: DAP-ATP- CJDN and OPDC Appendix D: Well 6 2000 Aquifer Test Analysis and 2013 Re-analysis Glossary of Terms Data Element. A specific type of information required by the Minnesota Department of Health to prepare a Wellhead Protection Plan. Drinking Water Supply Management Area(DWSMA). The area delineated using identifiable land marks that reflects the scientifically calculated wellhead protection area boundaries as closely as possible (Minnesota Rules,part 4720.5100,subpart 13). Drinking Water Supply Management Area Vulnerability. An assessment of the likelihood that the aquifer within the DWSMA is subject to impact from land and water uses within the wellhead protection area. It is based upon criteria that are specified under Minnesota Rules,part 4720.5210, subpart 3. Emergency Response Area(ERA). The part of the wellhead protection area that is defined by a one-year time of travel within the aquifer that is used by the public water supply well (Minnesota Rules, part 4720.5250,subpart 3). It is used to set priorities for managing potential contamination sources within the DWSMA. Inner Wellhead Management Zone (IWMZ). The land that is within 200 feet of a public water supply well (Minnesota Rules,part 4720.5100,subpart 19). The public water supplier must manage the IWMZ to help protect it from sources of pathogen or chemical contamination that may cause an acute health effect. Wellhead Protection (WHP). A method of preventing well contamination by effectively managing potential contamination sources in all or a portion of the well's recharge area. Wellhead Protection Area (WHPA). The surface and subsurface area surrounding a well or well field that supplies a public water system,through which contaminants are likely to move toward and reach the well or well field (Minnesota Statutes,part 103I.005,subdivision 24). Well Vulnerability. An assessment of the likelihood that a well is at risk to human-caused contamination, either due to its construction or indicated by criteria that are specified under Minnesota Rules, part 4720.5550,subpart 2. April-2020-5013AEN01 IRE* O WATER LRE Water 111 Acronyms CFR- Calculated Fixed Radius DAP-ATP- Determination of Aquifer Properties-Aquifer Test Plan DNR- Minnesota Department of Natural Resources EPA- United States Environmental Protection Agency FSA- Farm Security Administration MDA- Minnesota Department of Agriculture MDH - Minnesota Department of Health MGS- Minnesota Geological Survey MnDOT- Minnesota Department of Transportation MnGEO- Minnesota Geospatial Information Office MPARS- Minnesota DNR Permitting and Reporting System MWI- Minnesota Well Index MPCA- Minnesota Pollution Control Agency NRCS- Natural Resource Conservation Service SWCD - Soil and Water Conservation District UGE -Upgradient Extensions UMN- University of Minnesota USDA- United States Department of Agriculture USGS- United States Geological Survey April-2020-5013AEN01 IRE 6 WATER ©LRE Water iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report includes and documents the results of an amendment to the Part 1 WHP Plan (Plan) for the City of Apple Valley, Minnesota (City). This amendment is the second following an amendment in 2009 by Bonestroo. The original plan was completed in 2003 by Dakota County. The current Plan includes the amended delineation of the wellhead protection area (WHPA), drinking water supply management area (DWSMA), and vulnerability assessment for the City's supply wells included in Table 1, except Wells No. 1 through 3, and 14 and 15, which are for emergency use only. The amended delineation was completed in accordance with the Minnesota WHP Minnesota Rule (MR),parts 4720.5100 to 4720.5590. The City currently obtains its groundwater supply from 15 bedrock wells completed primarily in the Jordan Sandstone (Jordan) with two wells, Wells No. 4 and 16, completed in both the Prairie du Chien Group (Prairie du Chien) and Jordan aquifers. This Plan also includes Well No. 20, which was installed after the 2009 amendment. As a result of 10 years having passed since the 2009 amendment, the addition of Well No. 20,and a revised and improved regional groundwater flow model,Metro Model 3 (MM3) developed by the Metropolitan Council in 2014,a full update to the City's Plan is being completed at this time. The porous media delineations of the WHPA for the City's active wells were completed using a local model created from the regional MODFLOW model, MM3. MODFLOW is a 3D, cell-centered, finite difference, saturated flow model developed by the USGS (Harbaugh et al., 2005). The MM3 uses the MODFLOW-NWT version of MODFLOW(Niswonger, 2011). The regional MM3 consists of nine layers that represent the major aquifers and aquitards within the seven- county metropolitan area. These layers represent, from top to bottom, the following units: (1) surficial aquifer of glacial deposits; (2) St. Peter Sandstone or Quaternary Buried Artesian Aquifer; (3) Prairie du Chien; (4) Jordan; (5) St. Lawrence Formation (aquitard); (6) Tunnel City Group (formerly Franconia Formation); (7) Wonewoc Sandstone (formerly Ironton-Galesville Sandstone); (8) Eau Claire Formation (aquitard); and, (9) Mt. Simon Sandstone. The regional groundwater model was calibrated to steady-state and transient water levels,groundwater flow directions,and river base flows. The model was used to delineate the 1-, 5-, and 10-year capture zones for each City well (Figure 8). Additionally, a fracture flow analysis was undertaken to account for that portion of the groundwater capture being transmitted to the Jordan 10-year capture zone from the overlying fractured dolomite Prairie du Chien aquifer (Figure 9). The porous flow and fracture flow capture areas were combined to delineate the WHPA. Using roadways and public land survey system boundaries,the DWSMA was delineated around the WHPA. The boundaries of the composite 10-year capture area,fracture flow area,WHPA,and DWSMA are shown on Figure 10. A vulnerability analysis was completed by reviewing geologic sensitivity,as determined by the presence of low-permeable material (clay,till, shale) above the Prairie du Chien and Jordan aquifers, combined with a review of City well construction and historical water quality data from the City wells. All active City wells are considered vulnerable primarily as a result of high Tritium concentrations, except Well No. 19. Using this information, it was determined that the DWSMA has a vulnerability ranking of moderate to high, primarily based upon the amount of geologic sensitivity, or low time-of-travel for potential contaminants at grade to migrate downward to the Prairie du Chien or Jordan aquifers. The vulnerability rankings are shown on Figure 12. The results of this Plan will assist in the completion of Part 2 of the amendment April-2020-5013AEN01 IRE 6 WATER O LRE Water 1 1 INTRODUCTION LRE Water(formerly Leonard Rice Engineers,Inc.) (LRE)has developed an Amended Part 1 of the Wellhead Protection (WHP) Plan for the City of Apple Valley (City) (public water supply identification number 1190001). The work was performed in accordance with the Minnesota WHP Minnesota Rule (MR), parts 4720.5100 to 4720.5590. The results of the development of this WHP Plan Amendment are presented in the text below, on Tables 1 through 6, in Figures 1 through 13,and Appendices A through D. This report presents delineations of the wellhead protection area (WHPA) and drinking water supply management area (DWSMA), and the vulnerability assessments for the public water supply wells and DWSMA. Figure 10 shows the boundaries of the WHPA and the DWSMA. These are based on WHPAs for the City's 15 primary wells that are defined by a 10-year time of travel. Figure 10 also shows the emergency response areas (ERA),which are defined by a 1-year time of travel. Definitions of rule-specific terms that are used are provided in the"Glossary of Terms". This report also lists the technical information that was used to prepare this portion of the WHP Plan in accordance with the MR. Information pertaining to the Determination of Aquifer Properties -Aquifer Test Plan(DAP-ATP)and the well vulnerability sheets can be obtained from the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH). The City's wells included in the WHP Plan are listed in Table 1. Only wells listed as primary are required to be included in the WHP Plan. Table 1 -Water Supply Well Information Casing Casing Well Date Local Well Unique Well Name Number Type Diameter Depth Depth Constructed/ Vulnerability Aquifer (inches) (feet) (feet) Reconstructed Well No. 1* 205824 Emergency 16 x 10 445 520 1963 Vulnerable Jordan t Well No.2* 205825 Emergency 24 x 16 431 530 1964 Vul Nneo able Jordan Well No.3* 205812 Emergency 20 x 12 476 584 1962 Vulnerable Jordan Well No.4 205820 Primary 30164 x 400 504 1971 Vulnerable Jordan Well No.5 207677 Primary 30 x 16 425 487 1974 Vulnerable Jordan Well No.6 127263 Primary 30 x 16 426 507 1976 Vulnerable Jordan Well No.7 127277 Primary 30164 x 405 494 1977 Vulnerable Jordan April—2020—5013AEN01 LREe WATER O LRE Water 2 Table 1-Continued Casing Casing Well Date Local Well Unique Well Name Number Type Diameter Depth Depth Constructed/ Vulnerability Aquifer (inches) (feet) (feet) Reconstructed Well No.8 127297 Primary 30 x 16 432 506 1976 Vulnerable Jordan Well No.9 151561 Primary 30 x 16 428 515 1981 Vulnerable Jordan Well No. 10 151563 Primary 30164 x 426 502 1982 Vulnerable Jordan Well No. 11 191943 Primary 30 x 18 408 493 1985 Vulnerable Jordan Well No. 12 449257 Primary 30184 x 405 494 1989 Vulnerable Jordan Well No. 13 433284 Primary 30184 x 420 516 1989 Vulnerable Jordan Well No. 14* 509056 Emergency 30 x 24 x 863 1120 1989 Not Mt. 14 Vulnerable Simon Well No. 15* 519955 I Emergency 30 x 24 x 852 1127 1993 Not Mt. 16 Vulnerable Simon Prairie Well No. 16 205823 Primary 24 x 16 235 510 1966 Vulnerable du Chien- Jordan Well No. 17 603075 Primary 30184 x 412 513 2001 Vulnerable Jordan Well No. 18 674495 Primary 30 x 24 418 515 2003 Vulnerable Jordan Nt Well No. 19 731113 Primary 30 x 24 423 510 2006 Vulnerable Jordan Well No.20 778046 Primary 30 x 24 398 495 2006 Vulnerable Jordan *-Emergency well not included in WHP Plan or Model 2 ASSESSMENT OF THE DATA ELEMENTS Table 2 presents the assessment of the data elements as outlined in the MDH's scoping letter relative to the present and future implications of planning items that are specified in MR,part 4720.5210. April—2020—5013AEN01 IRE*WATER ©LRE Water 3 Table 2 -Assessment of Data Elements Present and Future Implications w i..i a o c3 Ti � ¢ Data Element co o 2 as ct vl Data Source d i. c.7 Precipitation H H H H MN Climatology Office,USGS Geology Maps and geologic M H H H MGS,DNR,USGS descriptions Subsurface data M H H H MGS,MDH,USGS Borehole geophysics Surface geophysics None available Maps and soil descriptions L H M L NRCS Eroding lands Water Resources Watershed units L H L L National Hydrography Dataset (USGS) List of public waters L H L L DNR,National Hydrography Dataset(USGS) Shoreland classifications Wetlands map Floodplain map Land Use Parcel boundaries map L H L L City GIS Data Political boundaries map L H L L ESRI Data Public Land Survey map L H L L ESRI Data Land use map and inventory Comprehensive land use map Zoning map Public Utility Services Transportation routes and L H L L ESRI Data corridors Storm/sanitary sewers and L L L L City PWS system map Oil and gas pipelines map Public drainage systems map L H L L City or list Records of well construction, City,Minnesota Well Index maintenance,and use H H H H (MWI) Surface Water Quantity Stream flow data L H H H DNR,USGS Ordinary high water mark L H L L DNR data Permitted withdrawals L M L L DNR Protected levels/flows L H L L DNR Water use conflicts L H L L DNR Groundwater Quantity April—2020—5013AEN01 O LRE Water IRE 6 WATER 4 Present and Future Implications au Data Element › c C Data Source c Permitted withdrawals H H H H DNR Groundwater use conflicts H H H H DNR Water levels H H H H DNR,MPCA,MDH,City Surface Water Quality Stream and lake water quality management classification Monitoring data summary L H L L MDH,USGS Groundwater Quality Monitoring data H H H H MPCA,MDH Isotopic data H H H H MDH Tracer studies None available Contamination site data No relevant data available Property audit data from contamination sites MPCA and MDA spills/release H H H H MPCA reports Definitions Used for Assessing Data Elements: High(H) -The element has a direct impact. Moderate(M) -The element has an indirect or marginal impact. Low(L) -The element has little if any impact. Shaded-The element was not required by MDH for preparing the WHP Part 1 Plan 3 GENERAL DESCRIPTIONS 3.1 DESCRIPTIONS OF THE WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM The City obtains its drinking water supply from Wells No.4 through 13 and 16 through 20.All of the wells are shown on Figure 1 and Table 1 summarizes information regarding them. 3.2 DESCRIPTIONS OF THE HYDROGEOLOGIC SETTING The hydrogeologic settings for the bedrock aquifers pumped by the City's wells are described in detail in the previous versions of the Part 1 Wellhead Protection Plan (Original by Dakota County, 2003 and Amendment by Bonestroo, 2009). The geology in the vicinity of the City consists of Quaternary-age glacial and post-glacial deposits that are underlain by Paleozoic-aged bedrock. The City's primary wells are bedrock wells completed primarily in the Jordan Sandstone (Jordan) with two wells,Wells No. 4 and 16, completed in both the Prairie du Chien Group (Prairie du Chien) and Jordan aquifers. The Prairie du Chien and Jordan bedrock units are underlain by the St. Lawrence Formation,which is a low-conductivity layer and is considered an aquitard. The City April-2020-5013AEN01 0 LRE Water LQEeWATER 5 also has two emergency backup wells (Wells No. 14 and 15) completed in the Mt. Simon aquifer. Figure 2 includes a surficial bedrock map and shows the distribution of bedrock units in the area of the City and hydrogeologic cross sections A-A'through D-D', included as part of the 2009 Amendment, are included in Appendix A. Table 3 - Description of the Hydrogeologic Setting in Jordan Aquifer Aquifer Attribute Descriptor Data Source Production from sandstone Aquifer Material intervals. Minor shale and City Well Logs siltstone present Primary Porosity 0.2 MDH recommended value Aquifer Thickness Approximately 90 to 100 ft thick City Well Logs Stratigraphic Top Elevation 539 to 604 feet AMSL City Well Logs Stratigraphic 439 to 505 feet AMSL City Well Logs Bottom Elevation Hydraulic Confined City Well Logs Confinement The reference value for the Reference Value transmissivity was estimated based Transmissivity(T) 11,500 ft2/day on the results of a pumping test Jordan conducted at City Well No.6(See (CJDN) Appendix C(DAP-ATPs)) Reference Value: The reference value for the Jordan 107.5 ft/day(32.76 m/day) was determined from the aquifer Hydraulic Range:90 to 120 ft/day thickness at Apple Valley 6(aquifer Conductivity(K) estimated to be 107 ft thick at City Well No.6),and the T value of 11,500 Hydraulic conductivity input to the model computed to ensure that ft2/day model replicates reference T value Flow generally from south to north Based on analysis and interpretation Groundwater Flow of measured heads and groundwater Field with cone of depression near model.Flow generally north toward Apple Valley the Minnesota River. Annual precipitation for the area is approximately 30.6 inches per year (in/yr) (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources [DNR], 2020). The average annual recharge to the surficial layers in the model is approximately 6.1 in/yr. Groundwater flow across the model domain in the Prairie du Chien and Jordan aquifers is generally to the north toward the Minnesota River and to the northeast toward the Mississippi River. These rivers are the April—2020—5013AEN01 1 B E is, Water 6 WATER 6 primary discharge location for local groundwater. Other smaller tributaries and water bodies are also included in the model. 4 DELINEATION OF THE WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREA 4.1 DELINEATION CRITERIA The boundary of the WHPA for the City's wells is shown on Figure 10.Table 4 provides descriptions of how the delineation criteria that are specified under MR, part 4720.5510 were included in the model. Table 4- Description of WHPA Delineation Criteria Criterion Descriptor How the Criterion was Addressed These features are used to help define the flow field Flow Boundary Streams and lakes within the modeled area. Surface water features are represented using the MODFLOW river package. The pumping amounts were determined based on the Other High Capacity maximum volume produced during the 5 year period Flow Boundary from 2014 through 2018. The pumping amounts of Wells these high-capacity wells were included in the methods used for the delineation. Daily Volume of Water Pumping information was obtained from Table 6.The Pumped See Table 5 annual pumped volumes were converted to a daily volume pumped by a well. The Metro Model 3 (MM3) (Metropolitan Council, Groundwater Flow See Figures 4 and 5 2014) model calibration process addressed the Field relationship between the calculated versus observed groundwater flow field. 11,500 ft2/day- The reference value for the transmissivity was Aquifer Transmissivity CJDN calculated using the hydraulic conductivity value estimated from the Well No. 6 pumping test. Time of Travel 10 years The City selected a 10-year time of travel. Information provided by the City, MDH, and from the DNR MPARS database was used to identify the maximum volume of water pumped annually by each well over the previous 5-year period. The volumes pumped from the wells over the previous 5 years are summarized in Table 5. The total volume pumped from the City's wells in the model is 3,127 million gallons per year (MGY).This value is significantly higher than any individual year. Minnesota Rules specify that the value used in the evaluation be the maximum volume over the past 5 years or the 5-year projected volume, whichever is larger. The 5-year maximum rate total (3,127 MGY) should be considered a conservative delineation volume and was confirmed by the City.The daily volume of discharge used as an input parameter in the model was calculated by dividing the annual withdrawal volume by 365 days. April—2020—5013AEN01 IRE 6 WATER ©LRE Water 7 Table 5 -Annual Volume of Water Discharged from Water Supply Wells Total Annual Withdrawal (million Withdrawal gallons/year Maximum [MGY]) Withdrawal Well Name Unique used in Current WHP Number 2014-2018 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 (MGY) Plan (m3/d) Well No. 1* 205824 0.427 0.057 0.005 0.003 .002 0 0 Well No.2* 205825 1.699 0.127 0 0.003 .003 0 0 Well No.3* 205812 0.002 0 0.084 0.003 .003 0 0 Well No.4 205820 46.039 58.99 48.236 5.781 22.803 58.99 611.79 Well No.5 207677 17.937 14.887 20.691 0.507 35.46 35.46 367.76 Well No.6 127263 358.732 359.347 330.863 379.151 366.082 379.151 3,932.17 Well No.7 127277 47.4 57.331 220.146 354.514 340.265 354.514 3,676.66 Well No.8 127297 0 0 1.006 0.004 32.63 32.63 338.41 Well No.9 151561 226.239 245.165 216.884 318.049 140.264 318.049 3,298.48 Well No. 10 151563 394.243 332.407 370.686 266.912 413.644 413.644 4,289.90 Well No. 11 191943 304.805 332.79 319.201 334.965 312.976 334.965 3,473.92 Well No. 12 449257 34.51 0.278 7.925 6.486 74.765 74.765 775.39 Well No. 13 433284 149.398 48.065 0 48.818 114.787 149.398 1,549.41 Well No. 14* 509056 0 0 0.122 0.011 0 0 0 Well No. 15* 519955 0 0.129 0 0 0 0 0 Well No. 16 205823 0 0 0 0 114.787 114.787 1,190.46 Well No. 17 603075 24.551 111.236 195.623 32.131 13.205 195.623 2,028.81 Well No. 18 674495 0 150.749 63.106 93.638 27.377 150.749 1,563.42 Well No. 19 731113 51.039 80.949 39.684 25.548 29.638 80.949 839.52 Well No.20 778046 432.979 161.277 167.262 300.873 182.043 432.979 4,490.42 Totals 2,090 1,954 2,002 2,167 2,221 3,127 32,427 Sources: DNR MPARS Permit Number 1974-5229,City,and MDH. April-2020-5013AEN01 IRE*WATER O LRE Water 8 Table 6-High Capacity Wells within 2.0 Miles of Well Field Well Permit 2013-2017 Average Number Name Number Aquifer Use Category Average Daily Use Use(MGY) (m3/d) Apple Valley St.Peter Non-Crop 207288 Valleywood Golf 1974-5120 Sandstone 14,219,520 184.51 Course Well (OSTP) Irrigation 212650 City of Lakeville 1980-6107 Jordan Water Supply 49,830,000 516.787 497931 Fischer Sand& 1995-6151 Water Table Industrial 28,105,980 286.96 Aggregate,LLP (QWTA) Processing 497932 Fischer Sand& 1995-6151 Water Table Industrial 28,105,980 286.96 Aggregate,LLP (QWTA) Processing 554248 City of Rosemount 1976-6069 Jordan Water Supply 119,083,280 1,392.45 -Source: DNR MPARS and MDH. 4.2 METHOD USED TO DELINEATE THE WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREA Figure 10 shows the WHPA delineated for City's wells using the results of the porous media modeling delineation. The WHPA is a composite of all the areas identified using methods described in this report that potentially contribute recharge to the aquifer used by the City's wells within a 10-year time of travel. 4.2.1 Porous Media Delineations The porous media delineations of the WHPA for the City's wells were completed using an existing regional MODFLOW model, Metro Model 3.0 (MM3), which was provided by the Metropolitan Council (2014). MODFLOW is a 3D,cell-centered,finite difference,saturated flow model developed by the USGS (Harbaugh et al., 2005).The MM3 uses the MODFLOW-NWT version of MODFLOW(Niswonger, 2011). The regional MM3 consists of nine layers that represent the major aquifers and aquitards within the seven- county metropolitan area. These layers represent, from top to bottom, the following units: (1) surficial aquifer of glacial deposits; (2) St. Peter Sandstone or Quaternary Buried Artesian Aquifer; (3) Prairie du Chien; (4) Jordan; (5) St. Lawrence Formation (aquitard); (6) Tunnel City Group (formerly Franconia Formation); (7) Wonewoc Sandstone (formerly Ironton-Galesville Sandstone); (8) Eau Claire Formation (aquitard); and, (9) Mt. Simon Sandstone. The regional groundwater model was calibrated to steady-state and transient water levels,groundwater flow directions and river base flows. A local-scale model for the area surrounding the City was created from the regional model and is shown on Figure 1. The local model and all of the modeling for this amendment was completed using Groundwater Vistas Version 7, which is a pre- and post-processor for MODFLOW. The local model was created in the following steps: 1. Initial particle tracking was done using the MM3. This particle tracking was used to a determine a range of approximate expected travel distances. The local model boundaries were then defined to April—2020—5013AEN01 O LREe WATER LRE Water 9 encompass this expected distance plus an additional buffer to ensure that the local model boundaries were sufficiently far away to not affect the particle tracking distance. 2. The boundary of the local model was defined to roughly correspond with the modeled MM3 groundwater head contours. Constant head cells were added in each cell along the boundary of the local model.These constant head cells were set to the heads simulated in the MM3. 3. The local model grid was refined by adding rows and columns with the additional discretization focused on the area surrounding the City. The grid spacing in the local model ranges from the standard MM3 grid spacing of 500 m on each side down to 15.625 m on each side within the local area. This refined grid spacing in the area of the City's wells provides better definition in the area of the flow field where simulating the influence of pumping from the wells is critical. 4. Site specific information allowed for more accurate definition of aquifer characteristics. These changes were to the Jordan Aquifer in the area of the City. The conductivity of the Jordan was modified to be in line with the values reported in the DAP-ATP in Appendix C.A zone was created in Layer 4 of the model for modifying the horizontal conductivity of the aquifer in the vicinity of the City's wells and their capture zones.This conductivity replaced those used in the MM3 for the area of the City. Within the modified area, the Layer 4 conductivity was set to 107.5 ft/day (31.72 m/day), which was calculated so that when this value was put into the model, the transmissivity near the City's wells is equal to the 11,500 ft2/day (1,068 m2/day) value estimated from the Well No. 6 pumping test. In addition to the previously mentioned changes, the following modifications were incorporated in the refined model: • The pumping rates from Table 5 were assigned to the City's wells. Note that the Multi-Node Well (MNW_00244) was already present in the MM3 and represents Well No. 16. The MNW-00244 well was deactivated and a new MNW well (Well No.Well 16) was added. • The pumping rates from Table 6 were assigned to the permitted high-capacity wells located within approximately 2 miles of the City's wells. As part of the delineation,groundwater pathline analyses were performed to determine the 1-, 5-, and 10- year capture zones and ultimately the WHPA. The pathline analysis was conducted using MODPATH Version 5, which is a particle tracking program (Pollock, 1994). MODPATH was used to determine the capture zone for each of the City's wells.This was completed by tracing 50 flow paths from each well for a 10-year travel time.A porosity of 20 percent was used for Jordan and a value of 5.6 percent was applied to the Prairie du Chien, consistent with the MDH guidelines, and slightly conservative for the aquifers. All of the primary City wells are open solely to the Jordan Aquifer with the exceptions being Well No. 16, which is open to the Prairie du Chien and Jordan aquifers, and Well No. 4, which is open to 5 feet of the Prairie du Chien. Wells No. 1, 2, 3, 14, and 15 are considered "Emergency" wells, and were therefore not included in this analysis. The pathline analysis for Well No. 16 was conducted assuming this well was completed open-hole primarily in the Jordan. The groundwater model estimates that approximately 88 percent of the total production from this well is from the Jordan. Pathlines were generated for this well, which confirmed that the Prairie du Chien capture zone is encompassed by the Jordan capture zone. April—2020—5013AEN01 IRE 6 WATER ©LRE Water 10 As part of the uncertainty analysis, additional groundwater pathline analyses, each consisting of 50 pathlines per cell for a 10-year time-of-travel,were performed to delineate the 1-, 5- and 10-year capture zones and ultimately the WHPA. The resulting area is a composite of the 10-year time of travel capture zones (Figure 8) calculated using this model for the base case parameters and the parameter values used in the uncertainty analysis that is discussed in the following section. The model input files are available upon request from the MDH. 4.3 RESULTS OF MODEL CALIBRATION AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS The goal of numerical model calibration is to obtain a reasonable correlation between the simulated model results and observed field data. The calibration process is generally completed by running a series of steady-state simulations (simulations where the flow magnitude and direction are constant with time), comparing calculated heads to the measured heads at wells within the model domain while changing the model parameters until the best match between the two is achieved. After a model is reasonably calibrated, a sensitivity analysis is used to determine the impact that changes to an input parameter have on the output of the model. In areas where there is a great deal of uncertainty in the physical parameters, either as a consequence of lack of data or based on the uncertainty associated with the interpretation of available data (i.e.pumping test analyses),a number of models are generally run to observe the effect on the model results over the range of potential values for each of the significant parameters. While none of the individual capture zones delineated as part of this analysis should be considered the"correct"one,it is assumed that the actual capture zone is encompassed by the resulting concatenation of the zones created during the uncertainty analysis. 4.3.1 Calibration The calibration plots, showing measured versus simulated hydraulic head values, for the model are illustrated on Figures 6 and 7. Note that the plots shown are for the local model that incorporates the modified hydraulic conductivity zone(K= 107.5 ft2/day[31.72 m/day]);value determined from Well No. 6 pumping test and adjusted so that model T=11,500 ft2/day) around the City's wells. The plots show that the simulated values and measured head values generally compare quite favorably and have a normalized root mean squared (NRMS) error of approximately 6.8 percent for observation points in layers 3 and 4 of the model representing the Prairie du Chien and Jordan aquifers,respectively.The calibration data sets are subsets of the one created for MM3 corresponding to each layer. The groundwater flow field and hydraulic head in the area of the City, interpolated from measured head from the Prairie du Chien and Jordan aquifers and river head data from values in Layers 3 and 4 of the model for the Minnesota River to the north,Mississippi River to the east,and Vermillion River to the south, is shown on Figure 4. The groundwater flow field for the Jordan Aquifer in the calibrated model,is shown on Figure 5. The interpolated groundwater flow field using measured head and values from the model is more realistic than using measured head values alone. The interpolated flow field using measured and river head values also more similarly resembles the simulated flow field from the model. The 1-, 5-, and 10-year capture zones,predicted using the calibrated model,are shown on Figure 8. Due to the variability associated with the physical characteristics of the aquifer, sensitivity and uncertainty analyses were completed as part of the modeling effort. April-2020-5013AEN01 1 B E is, Water 6 WATER 11 4.3.2 Sensitivity Analysis A sensitivity analysis was conducted to define the degree of change in model results caused by the variation of the particular input parameter. For example, changing the hydraulic conductivity of an area can change the calculated head values in and around the area of the modified model as compared to the heads in unmodified model. Because of the relative complexity of the area of interest in this model, the size and orientation of the modeled capture zone may be sensitive to any of the input parameters. This section describes how the input parameters for the sensitivity analysis were defined,and the results. The pumping rate determines the volume of the aquifer that donates water to the well. Increasing the pumping rate will expand the capture zone, for a given thickness, and decreasing it will make the capture zone smaller. • Results - The pumping rates for the City's wells were defined by the MRs and, therefore, are not considered variables for this analysis. The direction of groundwater flow and gradient can often be variable and change significantly with changing conditions such as fluctuations in local surface water elevations or the pumping rates in local wells. • Results-The regional flow direction and gradient were determined through the modeling process and reasonably approximate the flow direction and gradient determined through mathematical analysis of the measured heads in the area. The model was calibrated to hydraulic heads, and the calibration reasonably matched regional head data. Based on the regional observation data,the characteristics of the flow field,and the use of the aquifers of interest,there is not likely to be a significant change to the primary characteristics of the flow field. The hydraulic conductivity influences the size and shape of the capture zone. In the presence of a gradient, higher conductivities will result in long, narrow capture zones extending upgradient. Lower conductivities will result in shorter, wider capture zones. As there is nearly always a large amount of uncertainty associated with this parameter,most analyses will consider a range of conductivities.All of the transmissivity and conductivity data and analyses can be found in the DAP-ATP documentation from the MDH. • Results -The pumping test at Apple Valley 6 was used to determine the input"base"value for the hydraulic conductivity in the Apple Valley well field area such that the transmissivity in the model is equal to the transmissivity estimated from this pumping test. This calculation yielded a model input hydraulic conductivity of 107.5 ft2/day (31.72 m/day) near the City. For the sensitivity analysis a "high" hydraulic conductivity value of 156.10 ft2/day (47.58 m/day) and a "low" hydraulic conductivity of 52.03 ft2/day (15.86 m/day). These values correspond to ±50 percent of the base 107.5 ft2/day (31.72 m/day) values. The high conductivity run results in a capture zone that is elongated in the east-west direction,and the low conductivity run results in particle tracks that are elongated in the north-south direction. The MM3 also employs what are known as "quasi 3-d" confining layers between some of the layers in the model.These are used to represent thin layers that act as confining units between the aquifer layers without actually having to define another layer in the model. The Oneota portion of the Prairie du Chien, which directly overlies the Jordan,is represented using one of these quasi layers. April—2020—5013AEN01 IRE*WATER O LRE Water 12 The aquifer thickness and porosity influence the size and shape of the capture zone by limiting the water- bearing volume within a given area of aquifer. Decreasing or increasing either thickness or porosity forces a proportional decrease or increase in the areal extent of the capture zone. • Results - The thicknesses of the Prairie du Chien and Jordan aquifers within the model vary. The thickness values for the aquifers in the area of the City's wells were defined to be the thickness as specified in the stratigraphy database of the well log information. Therefore, aquifer thickness is not considered a variable for this study. The porosity for the Jordan Aquifer was chosen to be 0.2 based on MDH recommendations and is slightly conservative relative to the typical values associated with this aquifer.The porosity of the Prairie du Chien was defined to be 0.056, consistent with the value in MDH, 2005. The porosity is also not considered a variable. 4.4 ADDRESS MODEL UNCERTAINTY Using computer models to simulate groundwater flow always requires that simplifying assumptions be made. Local geology can be highly variable. Unfortunately, existing information is not detailed enough to define this degree of variability, and interpretation of log and aquifer test data is often inconsistent. For models of the scale used in this study,the information and computational ability does not exist to precisely delineate the WHPA. To account for this, a number of models are run to examine the various potential WHPAs for the well,given the range of the input data mentioned previously. MODFLOW models were used to delineate capture zones for the aquifers that supply water to the City's wells. As described previously,the hydraulic conductivity was the primary variable identified that would potentially cause the greatest change in the WHPAs for the City's wells. Capture areas were delineated for the assessed range of conductivities for a time-of-travel period of 10 years and the resulting concatenated capture zones define the WHPAs,shown on Figure 10. The WHPAs for the City's wells (Figure 10) consist of composites of the porous media aquifer delineations for the different hydraulic conductivity values used in the sensitivity analyses and the results of the fracture flow delineation described in the following section. This provides a conservative approach to addressing model uncertainty and produces a WHPA that is protective of public health. 4.5 FRACTURE FLOW DELINEATION The second WHPA delineation (the first is the Porous Media Delineation discussed in section 4.2.1) for the City's wells was determined using the "Guidance for Delineating Wellhead Protection Areas in Fractured and Solution-Weathered Bedrock in Minnesota" (MDH, 2012). This guidance was developed by MDH to address the increased variability in flow velocities and directions in geologic settings with secondary porosity. The guidance is a modified volumetric analysis and does not use a model based on flow equations. An initial fracture flow analysis was completed for active wells in the model using Delineation Techniques 3 and 4 to delineate the WHPA. These techniques were chosen, in part, because it is recommended for aquifers characterized by locally confined conditions where the ratio of the well discharge to the discharge vector is less than 3000,and Wells No.4 and 16 are open to both the Prairie du Chien and Jordan,and Wells No. 5 through 13, and 17 through 20 are open solely to the Jordan. Parameters used in the initial fracture flow analysis are summarized in Appendix B. April—2020—5013AEN01 IRE 6 WATER ©LRE Water 13 The fracture-flow analysis is a method that establishes a calculated fixed-radius (CFR) capture zone based on the 5-year volume of water pumped for a given well. The initial CFRs were calculated using the MDH Calculated Fixed Radius Tool (Tool) for all wells to determine overlap between capture areas. Special considerations had to be made due to significant overlap of several initial CFRs. As a result, through guidance received from MDH during similar fracture flow delineations, it was decided that it would be useful to apportion all combined flow to a geographic center of the well field. The MDH Tool was then reran to calculate a CFR representing a 10-year-volume of water pumped. This approach provided a simpler approach than rerunning the Tool many times to account for the overlap of each respective well's CFR. The final resulting combined 10-year CFR fracture flow delineation accounts for all wells'flow volume.The flow direction was determined by reviewing the upgradient capture direction determined from the 10-year porous flow capture zones in the groundwater flow model. Appendix B presents the input and output from the Tool used to determine the fracture flow delineation. Figure 9 illustrates the combined CFR,which is the resulting fracture flow WHPA delineation. 4.6 CONJUNCTIVE DELINEATION A review was conducted to determine if a conjunctive delineation was necessary due to the presence of surface water bodies above an area of the DWSMA rated as having a high vulnerability. Given that the main surface water features and their catchment areas are mostly contained within the DWSMA,there does not appear to be a direct connection between these aquifers and additional upgradient surface water capture outside the DWSMA. Considering the above information,no conjunctive delineation was completed at this time. 5 DELINEATION OF THE WHPA AND DWSMA After the porous media flow,uncertainty analyses,and fracture flow analysis,the capture zones delineated for each of them were plotted together. The outline of this concatenation created the final 10-year composite WHPA capture zone,shown on Figure 10,for use in delineating the DWSMA. The boundary of the DWSMA was defined by LRE using roads and Public Land Survey System coordinates (Figure 10). 6 VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENTS The Part 1 WHP Plan includes the vulnerability assessments for the public water supply wells and DWSMA. These vulnerability assessments are used to help define potential contamination sources within the DWSMA and to select appropriate measures for reducing the risk that they present to the public water supply. 6.1 ASSESSMENT OF WELL VULNERABILITY The City's well vulnerability assessment was conducted in accordance with the MDH guidance document, "Assessing Well Vulnerability for Wellhead Protection" (MDH, 1997). Vulnerability assessment rating sheets and vulnerability scores for Wells No.4 through 13 and 16 through 20 were obtained from the MDH and reviewed by LRE Water.The vulnerability of a well is scored based on the following six categories:DNR April—2020—5013AEN01 IRE 6 O WATER LRE Water 14 geologic sensitivity rating, casing integrity, casing depth, pumping rate, isolation distance from contaminant sources, and chemical and isotopic information. Based on these categories most of the City's wells are considered vulnerable as a result of tritium above 1 Tritium Unit(T.U.) in Wells No.4,6,9, 11,and 13. The wells not considered vulnerable are Wells No. 2 (not included in the model),14 and 15 (completed in the underlying Mt. Simon Aquifer and also excluded in the model), and 19. Tritium detections above 1 T.U. automatically triggered a vulnerable rating in wells with detections, and adjacent wells. Available supporting chemical and isotopic information is presented in Table 7 below. Table 7 -Isotope and Water Quality Results Well Name Chloride/ Nitrate Chloride Bromide Arsenic (Unique Tritium Bromide I Number) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) Ratio (ug/L) Well 3 2.8 0.18 2.76 0.015 184 (205812) (09/02/2008) (09/22/2014) (09/02/2008) (09/02/2008) (09/02/2008) Well 4 0.9 <50 (205820) (02/01/1978) (02/01/1978) Well 5 <0.05 0.83 <50 (207677) (10/28/1993) (02/01/1978) (02/01/1978) Well 6 <0.05 --- --- --- ---(127263) (09/22/2014) Well 7 <0.05 6.98 0.0371 188 < 1 (127277) (09/22/2014) (08/14/2012) (08/14/2012) (08/14/2012) (08/14/2012) Well 9 6.12 <0.05 (151561) (09/02/2008) (09/22/2014) Well 10 0.41 --- --- --- ---(151563) (09/22/2014) Well 11 15.1 39.1 0.0457 856 0.4 (191943) (03/06/1990) (08/14/2012) (08/14/2012) (08/14/2012) (09/22/2014) Well 13 10.7 1.7 51.5 0.0519 992 < 1 (433284) (03/06/1990) (02/25/2010) (03/25/2015) (03/25/2015) (03/25/2015) (08/14/2012) April—2020—5013AEN01 IRE* O WATER LRE Water 15 Well Name Chloride/ Nitrate Chloride Bromide Arsenic (Unique Tritium Bromide (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (ug/L) Number) Ratio Well 17 <0.05 10.8 0.0267 404 < 1 (603075) (09/22/2014) (08/14/2012) (08/14/2012) (08/14/2012) (08/14/2012) Well 18 <0.05 109 0.0715 1524 (674495) (02/25/2010) (03/25/2015) (03/25/2015) (03/25/2015) Well 19 0.11 --- --- --- ---(731113) (09/22/2014) -Source: MDH. 6.2 ASSESSMENT OF THE DRINKING WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT AREA SENSITIVITY The assessment of geologic sensitivity is a useful metric when estimating the relative vertical downward travel time of contaminants from grade level to the water table or source aquifer. A Level-2 DNR geologic sensitivity assessment was used for the City's wells. The Level-3 DNR geologic sensitivity rating is an empirical value determined by dividing the cumulative thickness of low permeability units above the aquifer by 10 (DNR, 1991). The resulting score is termed the "L-score". A higher L-score indicates more low-permeability material above the aquifer,and therefore a lower vulnerability.A low L-score represents higher vulnerability. For example, a rating of L-1 has a higher vulnerability than L-9,because there is less low-permeability material present above the aquifer.A Level-3 assessment was conducted since the aquifer utilized by the City's wells is confined. A Level-3 (where the aquifer(s) are buried,unconfined,or confined) assessment was also conducted for all MWI wells located in the vicinity of the DWSMA delineation. The geologic sensitivity "L-scores" were calculated by MDH using an MDH Geographic Information System tool that utilizes lithology information from the MWI. Figure 11 illustrates the geologic sensitivity for the DWSMA as determined by mapping L- scores from well logs for wells near the DWSMA. Review of site-specific data from the MWI,the original and amended Part 1 plans, and the Dakota County Hydrogeologic Atlases indicate that the thicknesses of low permeability clay-rich material vary across the DWSMA. These low conductivity materials, when approximately 10-feet thick or greater, provide protection against the potential vertical migration of contaminants. As a result of the varied thicknesses, the geologic sensitivity is low to high across the DWSMA. When considering wells included in the model, areas near Wells No.4 through 6,8,and 11 are considered to have low geologic sensitivity; areas near Wells No. 9, 10, 12, 13, 16, 18,and 20 are considered to have moderate geologic sensitivity; areas near Wells No. 7, 16,and 17 have a high geologic sensitivity. April—2020—5013AEN01 IRE* O WATER LRE Water 16 6.3 ASSESSMENT OF THE DRINKING WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT AREA VULNERABILITY Once the geologic sensitivity was determined for wells near the DWSMA, and for the area within the DWSMA, the vulnerability ratings could be determined. Since tritium has been detected above 1 T.U., the vulnerability rating was increased one level in areas of the DWSMA that had a low geologic sensitivity, which couldn't explain the presence of nitrate above 1 mg/L or Tritium above 1 T.U. (Figure 12). vulnerability throughout the DWSMA is moderate to high with areas near all City wells as moderate except areas near Wells No. 7, 16, and 17,which are high. This rating implies that the upper confining clay units marginally inhibit downward migration of groundwater,and that water can travel from the land surface to the confined aquifers within years to decades in moderate areas and weeks to years in the high areas (DNR, 1991). 7 COMPARING ORIGINAL PART 1 TO AMENDED PART 1 WHPAS The primary changes between the 2009 amended Part 1 WHPA and the WHPA in this Amendment are a significantly better understanding of the geology, a change in the method of delineating the fracture flow capture zone, an improved regional model providing better boundary conditions to the local model, and increased pumping rates over the rates included in the 2009 model. Of the changes mentioned above,the primary difference effecting the resulting 2020 amended WHPA and DWSMA was the difference in the resulting fracture flow capture area. The previous approach used a 10- year CFR and 10-year up-gradient extension (UGE). New guidance from the MDH requires a 5-year CFR and 5-year UGE, or in the case of the fracture flow capture area in this amendment, a 10-year combined CFR. This difference from the 2009 approach resulted in both a reduced WHPA DWSMA. 8 RECOMMENDATIONS Upon completion of this Amended Part 1 WHP Plan, the following recommendations are provided for the City to consider for better understanding of the hydrogeologic conditions of the source aquifer and refinement of future WHPA delineations. 1. Continue sampling for Tritium in Wells No.4, 6, 9, 11,and 13,and develop a plan to sample for Tritium concentrations in the remaining City wells. This will provide a more accurate understanding of the remaining well's vulnerability to activities on the land surface. 2. Complete an aquifer test on an existing City well completed in the Jordan Aquifer, but not Wells No. 5 or 6,to get a potentially more accurate T representative of the aquifer as a whole. MDH's re-analysis of the Well No. 6 test data indicated that Wells No. 5 and 6 may be exhibiting lower T results due to their position within a zone of low T associated with the Coon Valley Member,which is a basal member of the Ordovician age Oneota Dolomite (Mossler,2008). MDH also provided an alternative explanation for the lower T values at Wells No.5 and 6,which is that the lower T could be due to poorly calibrated SCADA sensors. Conducting a test on a different City well completed in the Jordan could eliminate this uncertainty, and improve the data used to model the capture areas for each City well. April-2020-5013AEN01 IRE*WATER ©LRE Water 17 9 REFERENCES Harbaugh, A.W., 2005, MODFLOW-2005. the U.S. Geological Survey modular ground-water model- the Ground-Water Flow Process: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods 6-A16. Metropolitan Council.2014.Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Regional Groundwater Flow Model,Version 3.0. Prepared by Barr Engineering. Metropolitan Council: Saint Paul, MN. Minnesota Department of Health, 1997.Assessing Well and Aquifer Vulnerability for Wellhead Protection. Draft document, February 1997,p. 23. Minnesota Department of Health, 2010. Minnesota Public Land Survey System Quarter Sections (derived from section corners), computer file, St. Paul, MN. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, 1991. Geologic Sensitivity Project Workgroup, Criteria and Guidelines for Assessing Geologic Sensitivity of Ground Water Resources in Minnesota, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Division of Waters, St. Paul, Minn., 122 p. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, 2020. Minnesota Normal Precipitation Maps: 1981-2010. http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/climate/summaries and publications/precip norm 1981-2010.html Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Appropriation Permit Program Website www.dnr.state.mn.us/waters/watermgmt section/appropriations/wateruse.html. Mossier, John H.. (2013). M-194 Bedrock Geology of the Twin Cities Ten-County Metropolitan Area, Minnesota. Retrieved from the University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy, http://hdl.handle.net/11299/154925. Mossier,John H.. (2008). RI-65 Paleozoic Stratigraphic Nomenclature for Minnesota. Minnesota Geological Survey. Retrieved from the University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy, http://hdl.handle.net/11299/58940. Niswonger, R.G., S. Panday,and M., Ibaraki, 2011. MODFLOW-NWT,A Newton formulation for MODFLOW- 2005: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods 6-A37,44 p. Pollock, D.W., User's Guide for MODPATH/MODPATH-PLOT, 1994. Version 5: A particle tracking post- processing package for MODFLOW, the U.S. Geological Survey finite-difference ground-water flow model: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 94-464, 6 ch. April—2020—5013AEN01 IRE.WATER ©LRE Water FIGURES April-2020-5013AEN01 LREe WATER 0 LRW Water ' South St.:Paul. I-2` ' �. ;/ r Richfield..,*. . '' - .. f ; • -r---- . � +cigL4s' i:y I.. NA ' . ~�H.en:,e i n . C ,_Unt�Y. ,/ . �� ;®- ,t,, (.-, Wa ington =:gan h, .: - C o ,.n;.t Blbomingto, r4? i,. ;0' r - Y: B3ooeiingtoh:r y;' ",: F - . ,-. r! : o Cottage Grove - s .-,, , - .; , . -, Inver Grove Heights o -c: I • - ' - APPLE VALLEY 4 zjr' : -?i) r .1.-", > p. APPLE VALLEY 8 • .'� `! APPLE VALLEY 15 APPLE VALLEY 11 k " ~ °Bur sville APPLE VALLEY 14Li 4~ 11,a '7 '--... ' • APPLE 3 v - •�r r APPLE VALLEY 10 __ . 1.4: = !' • - g''*0"-APPLE�VALLEY 18 APPLE VALLEY 19 Y Y �,/.� : . APPLE VALLEY 9 ®D c- __ L - - I v�,APPLE VALLEY 6 v _;''' -r t APPLE-VALLEY 1 ' — Rw..mfame _ — -- - I i APPLE VALLEY 2 42 r "'°nt1 I 47 1 ' Y `fi 52 APPLE VALLEY 16 - b ,4I' J.. APPLE VALLEY 17 APPLE VALLEY 13 a �, .r-- - 1 11 O U'J_7 +y . APPLE VALLEY 12 —i t ,_' - o c'.;_� _.' APPLE VALLEY 20 ' - APPLE VALLEY 5 �= 1 ' ;�- z ' '''.rr '---'-- _ , 1 r.i APPLE VALLEY 7 ' ,* F :rir �;,.,.m. Lakeville NV' M , • n _ . illia '' p _ .. -I • ]i:�;•Imo_! f ':.. l N .^ M $ COtt � 1'r� 41Sn_ _ � _ w. g pount .. " - - . O I , i _ yam; K. o III M • Active City Well Included in Model 7-County Metro Area 0 N e Emergency Backup City Well 3 [=1 dr Local Model Domain a Ir. Milill 0 3 d Service Layer Credits:Copyright:©2013 National Geographic Society,i-cubed Copyright:©2013 National Geographic Society Miles dallEZIIII a!Source:Local Model Domain extracted from Metro Model 3. City Well Icoations from Minnesota Well Index Database. a Prepared By: CITY OF APPLE VALLEY a IRE* WATER LRE Water APPLE VALLEY,MINNESOTA Innovative Water Resource Solutions SITE LOCATION AND MODEL BOUNDARY N Minneapolis-Saint Paul,Minnesota 5 CONNECTING WATER TO LIFE (651)341-8199 w FILE: 5013aen01applevalwhp01a.MXD(DATE: 3/31/2020 (FIGURE: 1 Op L'-- �/ Od OdOd " Od Od Os ^ `JOs o . Os T Opg s Os1. •pg Od Od 1�,, pg Od Od Opg r:.,, , Os Opg O.'•�p9 Opg "�`'Uth St. r O O Op Opg Odod Opg Od Os Richfield op o. od O Os J Os Od ¢ _ Opg Op J 77s - Opg Op Os Os Os OsO 13 . 0 Os g Os gan .9 . Os Os s I •p cj ®+� os Cotta a Grove Op Bloomington Cj J+ Inver Grove Heig `.SSOs Os Opg O Cj ''APPLE VALLEY 4 co Cj O flll 77 APPLE VALLEY 8 Op > ' APPLE VALLEY 15'.' Os Os APPLE VALLEY 11 Ctc Cr Cs Os Op Bu sville APPLE VALLEY 14 C Cs CsO Cj s p Os Op Ctc Ctc I APPLE VALLEffY,.3/ Opg APPLE VALLEY 10 , Cs CsCI L `� ®ag Os Os Cj APPLE VALLEY 19 Os Os Ctc Cj Op Os ps Opg Opg,APPLE VALLEY 18 Cs Op Opg APPLE'VALLEY 9 ., ` Ctc O — ,APPLE VALLEY 6 - Os Os Cs CsCjp APPLE VALLEY 1 Opg Os Cj Cs Os ®® 2i1 Os Ctc APPLE VALLEY 2 Opg Os Os Cj Cs CppOpgopg 1) APPLE VALLEY 16 Os Os Cj I) APPLE VALLEY 13 Os Os Opg �,j; APPLE VALLEY 17 Os _ Or±g Opg Opg APPLE VALLEY 12 C /cCj Op Os 1../ APPLE VALLEY 20 J Op CsqOs O: Opg APPLE VALLEY 5 Os j o Os Os Lakeville OpgOpg APPL LLEY 7 CCs HI OSOc. Q Opg Os Os Ctc Cj Ctcp oOs Os O011ss O I Os Cj CtcCs Op CsCJCsp z OsIC Os Os Os Cs OpOs Os a Os Os Osos Os Os Op Cj Opg cN Os Os s Op Os CsJ Opg Opg c_ Os Os Opgopg �Cl Os Os Os Os Opg f Cj Os Os Os 0Os Os n Os )(OsOs Os Os Os Os ' Os Os d Os • Os Os Opg Opg °4s Os Os Os Os Opg Opg __Opg Os 0 d 0 • Active City Well Included in Model Od Decorah Shale Cj Jordan Sandstone 7-County Metro Area ® Emergency Backup City Well Opg Platteville-Glenwood Formation Cs St. Lawrence Formation E Tunnel City Group Os St. Peter Sandstone Ctc (Formerly Franconia E Local Model Domain Op Prairie du Chien Group Formation) Illridilifiii 0 3 ill ilidWirill > Source:ESRI Online Imagery. MN Well Index. Bedrock Geology(MGS,M-194,2013). Miles a) Local Model Domain extracted from Metro Model 3. City Well Icoations from Minnesota Well Index Database. , a Prepared By: CITY OF APPLE VALLEY w aIRE' LRE Water APPLE VALLEY,MINNESOTA N WATER Innovative Water Resource Solutions BEDROCK GEOLOGY N Minneapolis-Saint Paul,Minnesota 5 CONNECTING WATER TO LIFE (651)341-8199 w FILE: 5013aen01applevalwhp01b.MXD(DATE: 4/28/2020 (FIGURE: 2 South St.:Paul. Richfield `- yl 'y rl. '� xa1 r y.. :' • � ,�_c. �. '✓ � Herat , ! 11 '� '�;r-.��.,.1—C' _4. A,- ': L ti -*';- ---- ..- l'" i -'-........ ' �` 13 ,• II Wa \i7ington y,i 4? •.:;, .I •�,•4'gan .,I Sr Nut Park Bloomington % .'' Cottage Grove .�a. — .... Inver Grove Heights 4 �.. :'el,, 149 `� 'I. . t,. APPLE VALLEY 4 S.} ,r _ ,,•-...i APPLE VALLEY 8 W•-- .. �� i11Ira 4, s-.t.. APPLE VALLEY 15 APPLE VALLEY 11 `` ��. OB sville F i - Nun•" APPLE VALLEY 14 ' — 'K — : APPLE VALLEY 3 (3' APPLE VALLEY 10 - - 3146.1 APPLE VALLEY 18 APPLE VALLEY 19 °t APPLE VALI1EY 9 • - - -4 •.N. APPLE VALLEY 6 - 1 — "___--_ � }•- APPLE VALLEY 1 ® i t,il.. ` — • i J APPLE VALLEY 2 ® •y' a is ll6semonr L. [+ -APPLE VALLEY 16 ® -r �^'. A APPLE VALLEY 17 APPLE VALLEY 13 — d ;r _ APPLE VALLEY 12 I t t—rr =' '.... ® APPLE VALLEY 20 L. IH±,_____ 147, .. t � APPLE VALLEY 5 jI�z - r- 1.4.4i-. - .t . j,n z • APPLE VALLEY 7 +► '" -0•'" m tc,. -•.: Oa .r hi LLIONY—' �,r Lakeville °� wm S a I . . 35. i Y'' .-- ► `.7 `_'1. ��, II sat'._- Jai =-'" -..----•'�°"�' — Viz;rp`�T.: a"a 1 _ _At ..- i a�w�^ - - -�_L.. ram_ '. . Scott 6 r+a;•- pount . r.•CO 1 - j. © `� - I �'y. =d+. ;,1 r . ti It 1 r *,•rami. t ,.ti...- r ; ,, _ _ .;i II • M • Active City Well Included in Model 7-County Metro Area 0 N ® Emergency Backup City Well ® High-Capacity Well Used in Groundwater Flow Model 'I dr (Within 2 miles of City Well Field) E a _ [=1 Local Model DomainIrmo nig 0 3 V> Miles ,,, Source:ESRI Online Imagery. MN Well Index. Bedrock Geology(MGS,M-104,2000). L. fn Prepared By: CITY OF APPLE VALLEY a LRE Water APPLE VALLEY,MINNESOTA IBE'• WATER Innovative Water Resource Solutions LOCATION OF CITY AND SURROUNDING HIGH-CAPACITY WELLS N Minneapolis-Saint Paul,Minnesota WITHIN 2 MILES USED IN THE GROUNDWATER FLOW MODEL 5 CONNECTING WATER TO LIFE (651)341-8199 w FILE: 5013aen01applevalwhp01c.MXD (DATE: 3/31/2020 (FIGURE: 3 a � ■ -'L�7• = Z ► ti;rj ,i'i.. ,It' 11t-wi ~ • .. y .„l- / 7 r` `7;r • 11ll... , -1.! St-4.. '•i4 :.i, .• 41 :!'•.•ice...: ' `''''''.I-''.' ■ L . ! �Y- 'FL:L*-- -RT - .? .i {,,,., f S. y leial,b i4• 7 -{-i.. r ' -_ ' 4VWO' - ■cr gr. >• a..-a.. n. -+:• ■ - 1. 'ry ( �S;,Weil. ' 1 `i i.,,,' -1.Sa_;..111d:.:,.;r::r_'.II`I'•" grAiw'r-- -• ,+r Y _- .. -. -. y _ -XI` • I ,r 7.•- -C 1 --44. -T _- .. �'1-k� 149 i - ';U=1/ •: '[ ; ® 'VI.'F°`.';: Wa "pin g t o n - FI-'�' lr.1 ;Inl SI { Ea a 3 Sr Nut Park wi,,l I, r'", '� r.'1 t 0/ oho o \`Cne/l [;..,' .eioo' f►g>foh f. . , as V• ' _' Cot.ta e� rove y�Yi 6o07a5: \,1/4„,,t.N.° w• �...`c.--,, 44 -' ��`• - .:., •. �$ AP,PLE_VAL'LEY 4 �� o it,, ,e'u s 1R '� ;� �g° ��� APP E ALL'EY 8=� y1 `"� wt 5 APPLE VALLEY/15 ��APPLE.VALLEY.11 �� � `• - +s.Yi. r`kr r- 3—12 a10.�% � `��� APPL'E EY�1i r'.,r - APPLE VAL'LEY,3 rFr �e� �j • \\� o ' u 1ri a �� k—APPLE VALLEY0 1N -= >g \ �1'��....iti APPLE VALLEY=19Y'� � 1. t ago i,"r'QPP,L'E VAL rEY-18 q w` z '� »o >ss - � r �APP.LE'V,LLE�9 �J,�I �'�t • aso 's,.•. �( APP__ L�E VALL'EYo6�/�. t • o161 i _ - Ini. f'�AP.PL'EkvAL•L'EY�1� f()A• = k "t"a •• .o 0 �-i. �PPLE'VALLEY-2 107 N, o t •L . • ' ''\: pJJ''` • Y'. ti y o •..„.,.._ APP�L`LLB 6 t�• • • a65 • 0 , t 755ffi(„3g -1'. s� \APPLE VALLEY 17 AP.P`LE,VA`Y 13 4 �Q - . ' �� ° •APP,LE LEY'12 • l '- s I •''"f . ppS 9 b APPLE VALLEY 20 840 7>sa • 1i , S95 -1•ros 1APPLE VALLEY 5 • co �'` 11041 : f ••'18995 • APPLE VALLEY7/• 80 820 I F, - :i r.' L 6q 4c, • c o -•Al_ �915 Le S o �0 p cO .,1,1 LLIo . ., �; 920 90s co, 0 wm •h I a'o w6, • — 0.• i=1 -•- • jofo925--o..a:',_0•) z • - • !��^° .1- saes 7 •. ---- %'w'•-'• ;•' • • • s,�y, _ 4L' g5 1_ _,a IF -.] - _ _ _ .v• �c'7"a `4:� SCOtt I: �,, :� . _ yr.3 r bow m i.'., AKRE' - r- - �IC ;-1i7a. n- y � - 'i 71 tit P'CI`IV d _ A E j�.,a • s co • City Well o ® Emergency Backup City Well 7-County Metro Area • Prairie du Chien-Jordan CWI Well Location E Potentiometric Surface Contour From Install Levels Under Static Conditions and d River Head Levels from Layer 3 and 4 from the Groundwater Flow Model(feet) - Groundwater Flow Direction 'I dr km amirlijil :i Local Model Domain 0 3 ifildEZJIPI Source:ESRI Online Imagery. MN Well Index Locations and Water Level Information.Potentiometric � � Miles d surface contours developed by MDH using the Kriging algorithm. Prepared By: CITY OF APPLE VALLEY aIRE. WATER LRE Water APPLE VALLEY,MINNESOTA Innovative Water Resource Solutions PRAIRIE DU CHIEN-JORDAN POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE MAP N Minneapolis-Saint Paul,Minnesota 3 CONNECTING WATER TO LIRE (651)341-8199 iil FILE: 5013aen01applevalwhpOld.MXD(DATE: 4/28/2020 (FIGURE: 4 __J L^ - 4;; r' - . . o. t I. . . .. .I -. _, -Vrn r. ► -c a ' ..-�:r ns...7° - ++�++r Jfi'. r i*{+•: fir.]'•-_',:' _ '` ._ 7r,' 41 r1i • ...• "- ."-.--' 7 • •aa yi;llr•.. VI g r,, �, "1-- _ -- � ��ii�!.I i�•:. , •a�, ,.i� � .� '�' ?F•nirka- P!Y _,; _ �liH vr..i. '!--q.', ?' 4:' -sue -- '. i-l'"I'6 7 -'•� < L —� ._- �, m �.r: � �.. ,fir:. i t .�/, �• - Li I;1• .r o , P.-�^i°:iii; iiw�f li f - '4:� a iglus Sr V'�mI Park -,.. . ..1L,,; 4 , re 6 {/ :.T; r B3aomit,gtori.• .sy Aso - f'r Cottag drove • . Grove.Heights ��ti ai�rts�1}. ^ ; • /�790 0L r ... g„„; -le:,ir„ aas e,'r f i' / �— IY::.1 I yi' 'i,: APPLE VALLEY 4 • i is '44y I • APPLE VALLEY 8 S APPLE VALLEY 15 z APPLE VALLEY\1 • M .•APPLE•VALLEY-14= °- . BurnsviIIe w�APPLE VALLEY 3 'Arr'� •A•PPLE yVALLEY'10 - .. 810-'-'"` DAPPLE VALLEY 18 APPLE VALLEY 19 8o - • APPLE VALLEY 9 ® A80 ��840 l� APPLE VALLEY 6�t �O 8g APPLE VALLEY 1 ® \•1,_. • 8S. O _.....APPLE-VALLEY 2` e 8,> On . APPLE VALLEY 16 • M • APPLE VALLEY 13 \APPLE VALLEY 17 *APPLE •o• ,,• C u n riy . \ ® VALLEY',12 \ 41, , . APPLE VALLEY 20 -� • 870 88 - APPLE VALLEY 5° • Z • 890 O APPLE VALLEY 7 Y*' • .„. . r •I--,"." N r--w. - goo • 3 O V1Nd, ' f I !Cl o g20 . I v �. C. 9, r- o • • a a• i 4rt o +.� . I: MSCOtt ➢ x pountY i 1 O -.� ; ;` o. ; 1'...,1T1 A 1 _o. 1 ., - I \ co • Active City Well Included in Model 7-County Metro Area ® Emergency Backup City Well • Prairie du Chien-Jordan CWI Well Calibration Location -15 e ® High-Capacity Well Used in Groundwater Flow Model aSimulated Potentiometric Surface Contour(feet amsl) a Groundwater Flow Direction 414 lira igir i 0 3 > 0 Local Model Domain L. didWrilli ro Miles d Source:ESRI Online Imagery. MN Well Index. a Prepared By: CITY OF APPLE VALLEY a LREoWATER LREWater APPLE VALLEY,MINNESOTA �, Innovative Water Resource Solutions SIMULATED GROUNDWATER EQU I POTENTIAL CONTOURS N Minneapolis-Saint Paul,Minnesota AND CALIBRATION WELL LOCATIONS OF THE PRAIRIE DU CHIEN-JORDAN 5 CONNECTING WATER TO LIRE (651)341-8199 w FILE: 5013aen01applevalwhp01e.MXD(DATE: 3/31/2020 (FIGURE: 5 Observed Vs. Computed Hydraulic Head Prairie du Chien Group; Model Layer 3 300 o ! 50410 a 280 - 00 %v° gm d . . • p 0 • 0 OQ 0 QO •r • ❑ D - E 260 - v° •• Saco �-- .,gyp o o o $ 0 a a %0 � •11 0 a 8 o ❑' c c$a' o o a e f ° 0 240 — °a � 0 00 o 220 — a / 66 O O 200 * 200 220 240 260 280 300 a Observed Om) E(0 m Prepared By: CITY OF APPLE VALLEY aLRE Water APPLE VALLEY,MINNESOTA L . WATER Innovative Water Resource Solutions STEADY-STATE MODEL CALIBRATION DATAAND Minneapolis-Saint Paul,Minnesota MODEL STATISTICS-OPDC 3 CONNECTING WATER TO LIFE (651)341-8199 FILE: 5013aen01applevalwhp01f.MXD IDATE: 3/31/2020 (FIGURE: 6 Observed Vs. Computed Hydraulic Head Jordan Aquifer; Model Layer 4 300 0 f tde 280 — 0 / 0 eP 0 0 E 260 — 0 ° '. 0 0 0 0_ pa 0 0 0/80 0co 240 — 0 0 0 • 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 47 00 4" if 0 N f 220 — / o � Z f f 0 f o fN 200 I I I I 0 200 220 240 260 280 300 a a Observed (m) a 0 S N E a x ° m n S Prepared By: CITY OF APPLE VALLEY aLui• LRE Water APPLE VALLEY,MINNESOTA , WATER Innovative Water Resource Solutions STEADY-STATE MODEL CALIBRATION DATA AND Minneapolis-Saint Paul,Minnesota MODEL STATISTICS-CJDN 3 CONNECTING WATER TO LIRE (651)341-8199 w FILE: 5013aen01applevalwhp01g.MXD IDATE: 3/31/2020 (FIGURE: 7 ® - Os Op Opg 77 Os APPLE VALLEY 3 - Opg 205812 • APPLE VALLEY 4 205820 Dia o` APPLE VALLEY 15 d path Opg Os �, Opg APPLE VAL_LEY•18 519955 pad° "' APPLE VALLEY 8 67449511; � �� 17297 ,�r / — PPALE_VALLEY 11 APPLE VALLEY 9 �i 151561 \ /% 19194. //�" APPLE_VAL'LEY14 Op Opg _ _ \\ APPLE VALLEY�6 � APPLEVALLEY,10\ 127263 z151563� 1 APPLE VALLEY 5 APPLEt' VALLEY 1 % p 2076770 % l�\ 31113 APPLE VALLEY 13� °) APP,LE VALLEY 7/� 433284 th St W 127277% /, r APPLE VALLEY 1 `APPLE VALLEY -F'aL 205824 // t '' III APPL44957E 2 ® / ��Ili�I `1 778046 \` E VALLEY 17 Os Opge (7 APPLE VALLEY/16 iir I_„ Iy., _20583� ,,,i �„",'I' 603075 \ ..... 1 APPLE 05825 VALLEY 2 ` „;;' i �iij I % II /III I,Ill 9/ti /' — a/I%,II I i m . Os %°% ��� _ •1 1��r ' 4� _ I -- _�. _ m - 0 M 4 o Opg N . N g > Opg a 3 3 a)`, > Opg a] Opg s M ® Active City Well Included in Model Opg Platteville-Glenwood Formation 7-County Metro Area e Emergency Backup City Well Os St. Peter Sandstone 3 1-Year Flowpaths I 5-Year Flowpaths Prairie du Chien Group a — 10-Year Flowpaths All t — — — 10-Year Composite Capture Zone(porous flow) d 0 rl 4,000 MI* d Source:ESRI Online Imagery. MN Well Index. Bedrock Geology(MGS,M-194,2013). Feet a a Prepared By: CITY OF APPLE VALLEY w a IRELRE Water APPLE VALLEY,MINNESOTA 1NATE R Innovative Water Resource Solutions 1-,5-,and 10-YEAR FLOWPATHS AND 10-YEAR COMPOSITE CAPTURE N Minneapolis-Saint Paul,Minnesota ZONE(POROUS FLOW)WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREA BOUNDARIES 5 CONNECTING WATER TO LIFE (651)341-8199 iu FILE: 5013aen01applevalwhp01h.MXD IDATE: 3/31/2020 (FIGURE: 8 �o I � o oo / 830— Os V ..19p Op / Opg ,,p/ )O �190 r// /� 840 ® Os /0 APPLE VALLEY 3 VP 0=' 205812 APPLE VALLEY 4 ® 205820 50 _----------Opg B Op„ ��� APPLEVALLEY15 Os � 51� 9955 APPLE VALLEY 18jil AP,PLE VALLEY 8 /67,495 127297 • APPLE VALLEY/9 APPLE 1943VALLEY 11 °'o 15156� \\ / Op APPLE VALLEY 14 Opg / Opg 509056co APPLE VALLEY 6 APPLE VALLEY 10 127263/ I'151563 No,\APPLEVALLEY 5 APPLE VALLEY 19 207677 Opg � 7311 i3 I Pg APPL4 ALLEY 13 145th St W APPLE VALLEY 7 • • 84 127277 // APPLE VALLEY 1 APPLE VALLEY 20 APPLE VALLEY 12 p q� ® 205824 0 7 778046 449257 III Os ~860 APPLE VALLEY 16 . APPLE VALLEY 17 APPLE VALLEY 2 0582\ Opg 603075 205825 *---..,...(9O Q 820 z a) 0 a 0 N To m Os 0 z M OJ ID Z Q d Opg o N o\ > RIa lar M M d o Op. E t 86,0 o _ T. 11!„.______,,,...----- er Opg Opg co M • Active City Well Included in Model Opg Platteville-Glenwood Formation 7-County Metro Area • Emergency Backup City Well Os St. Peter Sandstone E Fracture Flow-WHPA(Calculated Fixed Radius) Op Prairie du Chien Group i aPotentiometric Surface Contour(from Figure 5) a Groundwater Flow Direction 'I 4 x 0 4,000 iliklaill To d Source:ESRI Online Imagery. MN Well Index. Bedrock Geology(MGS,M-194,2013). Feet a Prepared By: CITY OF APPLE VALLEY aLRE Water APPLE VALLEY,MINNESOTA NIRE. WATER Innovative Water Resource Solutions FRACTURE FLOW DELINEATION BOUNDARY N Minneapolis-Saint Paul,Minnesota 5 CONNECTING WATER TO LIFE (651)341-8199 w FILE: 5013aen01applevalwhp0li.MXD IDATE: 3/31/2020 (FIGURE: 9 . - ,1 ..f 1 - :_gib.- . - •- - . APPLE VALLEY.3 ... -I 205812:; APPLE VALLEY 4 -- 205820 :.' APPLE VALLEY 15 .c 519955 'APPL'EtVALLEY.18 '4, Pa�� 67 495 4 > 0- '-'/ ALEY8 1 H/j \2729� .. m APPLE VALLEY 9 / /APPLEVALEY 11 3 15156'1 19�\43 i APPLE VALLEY 14 i:a: i u." `� 509056 -" .APP_ L'EFALLEY46 APPL VALLEY 10 P 127263 i ®� . 1151563 •• m �'I�' APPLE VALLEY 19 ' APPLE VALLEY 5 731113 I . 207677 TL. / li APPLE VALLEY 7 APPLE VALLEY 13 • 1•I. St VA 127277 • 433284 APPLE VALLEY11E\; -_ - - _ • APPLE,VALLEY 20 APPLE VALLEY 12 } $ 205824•' ■ ..7 778046 449257 004ie A ::.:. -:: APPLE VALLEY�1,6 APPLE VALLEY 17` APPLE VALLEY 2 ...: ,_ .205823 - 603075 205825 1 - z - -.' - n a) 0 N - s f0 OJ .4, ' (b.. 0 r 4 �h ® fit. co a) ^ _ [L X 0 n m f.. n m • Active City Well Included in Model co o e Emergency Backup City Well 7-County Metro Area a Fracture Flow-WHPA(with extension) - - - 10-Year Composite Capture Zone(porous flow) Combined Wellhead Protection Area a o_ Drinking Water Supply Management Area 'I 111111111 >- MAO O Emergency Response Area(1-yr time of travel-porous and fracture flow)) 0 4,000 d > � Feet ,,, Source:ESRI Online Imagery. MN Well Index. a Prepared By: CITY OF APPLE VALLEY aIRELRE Water APPLE VALLEY,MINNESOTA WATER R Innovative Water Resource Solutions COMBINED WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREA BOUNDARY N Minneapolis-Saint Paul,Minnesota AND DWSMA BOUNDARY 5 CONNECTING WATER TO LIFE (651)341-8199 w FILE: 5013aen01applevalwhp0lj.MXD IDATE: 3/31/2020 (FIGURE: 10 ram, O C cl cl 0-1 AP,LEiVAL'LEY 3 (77 „ ® alftt ' j 205812' ® APPLEIY 4 • 0ICE, C 11 0 205820 /rd0 Q O. 519 i oaso CIAPPLE)VALLEYt<15r) w 0 CD CI � APPL'E:VALLrEY 1 i55 Palo 67 495 APPLE VALLEY 8 j. i 127297 O APPLE VALLEY 9• / / APEoY91 °'3 ILLI 151551 w 191943 ' APPLIE VALLEY 14 -" -' APPLE VALLEY 6 R 0 Q _ -� ) APPLE VALLEY 10 3 _ ., .=- 1272,63 .. 151563 Illr I.. ,.5 APPLE VALLLLEEY 5 '_; 207677 5, - APPLE�VALLEY,19.. m 731113 •• 0 •` APPLE VALLEY 13- 0 ►l•APP.LE►VALLEY*7 433284 - '-th St APPLE VALLEY 11�_�.; ; 1s��?T 0 APPLE VALLEY4Q _.� ® 205824 ■ ®- 449257 ' APPLE VALLEYS) l ® _ APPLE VALLEY ' 0 .778046 • - --APPLE�VALLEY 2 •`:. •••-.. 205823 O W 0 •205825 APPLE,VALLEY 17 �:. 603075 I 0 Co. - _� a a, x • O N m. 0 F H M 0 a 7711 m o O N W x > Q = ID I M ® City Well Geologic Sensitivity 7-County Metro Area 0 Insufficient Data I 0 I High Sensitivity • 0 Domestic Well I o I Moderate Sensitivity rii E =Low Sensitivity(L-Score: 1-3) Combined Wellhead Protection Area IN Low Sensitivity(L-Score:4-7) 11 Drinking Water Supply • Very Low Sensitivity(L-Score:8-11) - 0_ 11111 - Management Area I • I Very Low Sensitivity(L-Score:>11) 0 4,000 MI* � Feet Source:ESRI Online Imagery. MN Well Index. a Prepared By: CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 3 LRE Water APPLE VALLEY,MINNESOTA �, • WATER Innovative Water Resource Solutions DRINKING WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT AREA o N Minneapolis-Saint Paul,Minnesota GEOLOGIC SENSITIVITY ASSESSMENT 0 CONNECTING WATER TO LIFE (651)341-8199 w FILE: 5013aen01applevalwhp01k.MXD IDATE: 4/28/2020 (FIGURE: 11 ....-,,.- .T- - .. .._. M'- - -.-_ 1. - _ r_ -1:_._ - t"- .. , i. r • • • APPLE VALLEYS'''.•• "' i s 205812 APPLE VA . .: T • • ..,,..,. ..i. ..„ . �'` T yy 205820 ..... a APPLE VALLEY 15 • , . .. ▪i . `.o. ..' r. 519955 Pa .. �ot` APPL'E:VALLEY 18 APPLE VALLEY/ :1, /APPLEVLLEY9 15156� 191943 ;. .�R �' APPLE VALLEY 14 il 509056� �„ ▪ • — ' • - EIVALLEY 6 ; it APPLE VALLEY 10 °� 127Eci 151563 " 171• APPLE VALLEY ' APPLE VALLEY 5 ® 731113 t`o ` • ` 207677 CD y 1 APPLE VALLEY 7 APPLE VALLEY a 127277 ® ® 433284 APPLE VALLEY 20 APPLE VALLEY.1. _ 778046 "APPLE VALLEY% e 205824 .r 449257 *APPLE VALLrEY 16li•" ' APPLE VALL3075EY 17 ® APPLE VALLEY 2.:::::::.. .:.::: : v.. - •F205823 205825' ... 1 - at x to 0 N m .. , l ..:.',4!-..".„..-N .r.,.._..:: .,....._(''' --'.'...'. .' ....,.7::,......,... . .,-• 71:71•J H:-:.;•-:: --' i..,. " - • • • M 3 d ® ® •• T. a a (0 O • N co e City Well DWSMA Vulnerability ZS Combined Wellhead I High Protection Area I I Moderate ' Drinking Water Supply E Management Area 0 4,000 11111111i d > � Feet ,,, Source:ESRI Online Imagery. MN Well Index. a to Prepared By: CITY OF APPLE VALLEY a LRE Water APPLE VALLEY,MINNESOTA IREWATER Innovative Water Resource Solutions DRINKING WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT AREA N Minneapolis-Saint Paul,Minnesota VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT 5 CONNECTING WATER TO LIFE (651)341-8199 w FILE: 5013aen01applevalwhp011.MXD (DATE: 3/31/2020 'FIGURE: 12 APPLE•VALLEY 3. 127th S7. W, 205,2 e _ • APPLE'VALLEY 4 '/2 �77 205820 p APPLE VALLEY 15 APPLE•VALLEY 18 51995 R Pav' 67 495 APPLE VALLEY,8 11 127297 Q APPLE VALLEY 9 APPLE VALLEY 11 ).5 151561943 -3 APPLE VALLEY 14 CI' 0 509056 3 " APPLE VALLEY:6"-`:,;i; ':':. ' . APPLE VALLEY 10 .5 127263 ::•.:•.:.. _ • 15156i J 7_ APPLE VALLEY„5::: „ APPLE VALLEY 19 vs 207677 •. ` 731113 APPLEVALLEY 13 A 7,- —.,-,-- APPLE VALLEY 7 � � 4 3284 1' th St.W y 127277 APPLE VALLEY 1 - •: ••---... APPLE VALLEY 20 �` • 778046 APPLE VALLEY 12 205824 449257 APPLE - • APPLE VALLEY 16 APPLE;VALLEY 17 \ : :..... ._ : 1 205823 603075 APPLE VALLEY 2 5 - 205825 _ w • > l4 Z 1. \ . • e ® I �: M s • \\\ . '? , ..... , 11-1 NS1 l n r f. • ... -. .. - .. a i coc 0 m M • Active City Well Included in Model 7-County Metro Area 0 N ® Emergency Backup City Well 2020 Amended WHPA 2009 Amended WHPA 'I 611 a t 0 4,000 lIP-. dak • __ Feet ,,, Source:ESRI Online Imagery. MN Well Index. a a Prepared By: CITY OF APPLE VALLEY a N lb WATER LRE Water APPLE VALLEY,MINNESOTA Innovative Water Resource Solutions 2009 AND 2020 AMENDED WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREAS N Minneapolis-Saint Paul,Minnesota 5 CONNECTING WATER TO LIFE (651)341-8199 w FILE: 5013aen01applevalwhpolm.MXDIDATE: 3/31/2020 (FIGURE: 13 APPENDIX A HYDROGEOLOGIC CROSS SECTIONS - 2009 AMENDMENT April—2020—5013AEN01 LREe WATER 0 LRW Water ..'"-- .....g..?..•../--t"' -- --:' L . . ' -' • "1j ' l . _,)\\ ---,.) iT),__ • -Itcj c3--:\/ ' —1 \-J- - 2 -. Lt .. - .) -y --- - -u9 A k‘,.._ 1 Th, .__.,-,-, r---- -T1 r,A, rf r i , z1 l= \ (!) J r' ' �-, � _ iiL - `-) �, r of } ( / ..---i ,.._.) ____ • . . .,\ 11 - 1 FT 1-1 1%_..,3 1 L___L -- I. 1 i -___‹- --, _--) / -_-)_ - � t - - I �.� i f t .L . 4 - i r L _.,.•._, .,,,-----_________r, , _ . ,... ,.. .! •-.,. .,,...„. ..) / ) -, _,___ (f f :\.) • ...,---r- 1 i -' I I I .-) . ' ( Li 4 f j j r ..?-7--,,,(, __i_r,• i r „.____-._-4----- . _., 1 r_.- ._' ').- ,I)I F\. 09,?'-)±d,y 1. r--.---.-.,//4 01_ ir• 1 1D. 7-7' '7)- \I -\E.--..-_-_T_ _ j 08 14 10 13'Th'.. . F04 fr - L _,c * ...- ,2y '1_ () .. . . • --_. / ,--, . --, — .,),-'-' 1 I \ ('' t4 02 -- , ,-, --7_1 ,---) I I _ I 7 t. I - - -� Y�. \ , L1 1 0 1 2 Miles Interpretations of codes used in the well cross sections: (unused codes are not described) Geosec.shp Geologic formations Q Quaternary (Glacial deposits) ODOR Decorah Shale OPVL Platteville Limestone OPGD Platteville — Glenwood Formation OPGW Glenwood Formation OSTP St. Peter Sandstone OPDC Prairie du Chien Dolomite CJDN Jordan Sandstone CSTL St. Lawrence Formation CSLF St. Lawrence and Franconia Formations CFRN Franconia Formation CIGL Ironton — Galesville Formation CECR Eau Claire Formation CMTS Mount Simon Sandstone Casesec.shp Innermost Well Casing 1100 03 Geosec.shp 205812 PITT 02 01 a 205825 205824 OGAL 1000 M ODOR — CDPL _ OPAL OPG OPGD •`� 000 CPGVV CGVVD CGSP OSTP 800 CSP CSPC OPDC CPC CJDN 700 CJSL CSTL \�\ C S F \\\` CSLF CFRN 600 CGSL CIG CIGL CECR CE _500 C E1v1 S CM _ CMTS CAMB Casesec.shp 400 09 04 08 12 10 13 Geosec. hp 151561 205820 127297 449257 151563 433284 PITT OGAL ODCR 4DPL OPVL OPG OPGD CPGVV = OGWD OGSP -800 OSTP OSP 4SPC OPDC 4PC 700 CJDN CJSL CSTL CSF CSLF 00 J CFRN CGSL CIG CIGL 500 CECR CE GEMS CM CMTS 400 CAM E geosec.shp PITT 16 07 05 06 04 08 11 0 205823 127277 207677 127263 205820 127297 191943 OGAL 1000 GDC R OPVL OPG 900 OPGD GPGVV GGVV D OGSP 800 OSTP OSP OSPC OPDC OPC 700 CJDN CJSL CSTL C S F 600 CSLF — CFRN CGSCGL 0 .. 500 CIGL CECR Ilk; CE • CEMS CM 400 CMTS CAMB casesec.shp 15 14 Geosec.shp 519955 509056 10D0 PITT O OGAL 900 ODOR ODPL OPVL OPG OPGD 700 OPGWN OGVVD OGP 600 OTP OSP 500 OPC OPDC OPC 400 CJDI1 CJSL 300 CSTL C F C L F 200 CFRIV CGSL CIG 100 CIGL CECR 0 CE CEMS CM -100 CMTS CAME -200 Casesec.shp APPENDIX B FRACTURE FLOW ANALYSIS April-2020-5013AEN01 LREe WATER 0 LRW Water Appendix B- Fracture Flow Tool Output City of Apple Valley 2020 Part 1 WHP Plan Amendment City of Apple Valley Combined 10-Year CFR (Q/Qs > 3,000)for all Wells using Combined Volume from OPDC as 30%of Total Pumped Volume in Groundwater Flow Model Well#=All Wells Combined X=484,731.436,Y=4,954,490.355 10 Year Pumping Volume (3650 days) Pumping Volume (Q): 10,561.270 m3/day372,967.725 cu.ft./day 1,937.495 gal./min. 2,789,992.360 gal./day Water Producing Zone Thickness (L): 50.902 m 167.000 ft. Effective Porosity (n): 0.057 Original (CFR) Radius: 2,056.489 m 6,747.012 ft. 1st Bearing from Well = 165°from North. 5-yr with 5-yr Extensions—30% Flow from OPDC—Used for Comparison to Combined 10-Year CFR Above WeII#= 205820 APPLE VALLEY 4 X=484,540.000, Y=4,954,771.000 5 Year Pumping Volume (1825 days) Pumping Volume (Q): 183.540 m3/day6,481.654 cu.ft./day 33.671 gal./min. 48,486.138 gal./day Water Producing Zone Thickness (L): 12.192 m 40.000 ft. Effective Porosity (n): 0.056 Original (CFR) Radius: 395.176 m 1,296.509 ft. 1st Bearing from Well = 22°from North. WeII#=207677 APPLE VALLEY 5 X=484,409.722,Y=4,954,356.971 5 Year Pumping Volume (1825 days) Pumping Volume (Q): 110.330 m3/day3,896.267 cu.ft./day 20.240 gal./min. 29,146.102 gal./day Water Producing Zone Thickness (L): 57.912 m 190.000 ft. Effective Porosity (n): 0.056 Original (CFR) Radius: 140.580 m 461.222 ft. 1st Bearing from Well = 193°from North. WeII#= 127263 APPLE VALLEY 6 X=484,418.000,Y=4,954,576.000 5 Year Pumping Volume (1825 days) Pumping Volume (Q): 1,179.650 m3/day41,658.946 cu.ft./day 216.410 gal./min. 311,630.560 gal./day Water Producing Zone Thickness (L): 60.046 m 197.000 ft. Effective Porosity (n): 0.056 Original (CFR) Radius: 451.438 m 1,481.097 ft. 1st Bearing from Well = 197°from North. WeII#= 127277 APPLE VALLEY 7 X=484,365.453,Y=4,954,013.574 5 Year Pumping Volume (1825 days) Pumping Volume (Q): 1,103.000 m3/day 38,952.077 cu.ft./day 202.348 gal./min. 291,381.773 gal./day Water Producing Zone Thickness (L): 59.436 m 195.000 ft. Effective Porosity (n): 0.056 Original (CFR) Radius: 438.758 m 1,439.496 ft. 1st Bearing from Well = 175°from North. WeII#= 127297 APPLE VALLEY 8 X=484,845.170,Y=4,954,777.417 5 Year Pumping Volume (1825 days) Pumping Volume (Q): 101.520 m3/day3,585.145 cu.ft./day 18.624 gal./min. 26,818.747 gal./day Water Producing Zone Thickness (L): 57.302 m 188.000 ft. Effective Porosity (n): 0.056 Original (CFR) Radius: 135.566 m 444.771 ft. 1st Bearing from Well = 136°from North. WeII#= 151561 APPLE VALLEY 9 X=484,084.000,Y=4,954,839.000 5 Year Pumping Volume (1825 days) Pumping Volume (Q): 989.550 m3/day34,945.628 cu.ft./day 181.536 gal./min. 261,411.453 gal./day Water Producing Zone Thickness (L): 54.559 m 179.000 ft. Effective Porosity (n): 0.056 Original (CFR) Radius: 433.758 m 1,423.090 ft. 1st Bearing from Well = 237°from North. WeII#= 151563 APPLE VALLEY 10 X=485,368.037, Y=4,954,774.184 5 Year Pumping Volume (1825 days) Pumping Volume (Q): 1,286.970 m3/day45,448.916 cu.ft./day 236.098 gal./min. 339,981.505 gal./day Water Producing Zone Thickness (L): 63.094 m 207.000 ft. Effective Porosity (n): 0.056 Original (CFR) Radius: 459.996 m 1,509.173 ft. 1st Bearing from Well = 100°from North. WeII#= 191943 APPLE VALLEY 11 X=485,236.669,Y=4,955,164.844 5 Year Pumping Volume (1825 days) Pumping Volume (Q): 1,042.180 m3/day 36,804.239 cu.ft./day 191.191 gal./min. 275,314.828 gal./day Water Producing Zone Thickness (L): 52.730 m 173.000 ft. Effective Porosity (n): 0.056 Original (CFR) Radius: 452.797 m 1,485.554 ft. 1st Bearing from Well = 80°from North. WeII#=449257 APPLE VALLEY 12 X=485,223.762,Y=4,954,398.270 5 Year Pumping Volume (1825 days) Pumping Volume (Q): 232.620 m3/day8,214.898 cu.ft./day 42.675 gal./min. 61,451.703 gal./day Water Producing Zone Thickness (L): 56.388 m 185.000 ft. Effective Porosity (n): 0.056 Original (CFR) Radius: 206.868 m 678.700 ft. 1st Bearing from Well = 120°from North. WeII#=433284 APPLE VALLEY 13 X=485,612.811, Y=4,954,386.231 5 Year Pumping Volume (1825 days) Pumping Volume (Q): 464.820 m3/day 16,414.963 cu.ft./day 85.273 gal./min. 122,792.453 gal./day Water Producing Zone Thickness (L): 60.046 m 197.000 ft. Effective Porosity (n): 0.056 Original (CFR) Radius: 283.377 m 929.714 ft. 1st Bearing from Well = 115°from North. WeII#=205823 APPLE VALLEY 16 X=483,705.111, Y=4,953,424.000 5 Year Pumping Volume (1825 days) Pumping Volume (Q): 1,190.455 m3/day42,040.521 cu.ft./day 218.392 gal./min. 314,484.939 gal./day Water Producing Zone Thickness (L): 52.121 m 171.000 ft. Effective Porosity (n): 0.056 Original (CFR) Radius: 486.758 m 1,596.976 ft. 1st Bearing from Well = 201°from North. WeII#=603075 APPLE VALLEY 17 X=483,950.734,Y=4,953,653.296 5 Year Pumping Volume (1825 days) Pumping Volume (Q): 608.640 m3/day21,493.918 cu.ft./day 111.657 gal./min. 160,785.677 gal./day Water Producing Zone Thickness (L): 59.436 m 195.000 ft. Effective Porosity (n): 0.056 Original (CFR) Radius: 325.925 m 1,069.308 ft. 1st Bearing from Well = 190°from North. WeII#=674495 APPLE VALLEY 18 X=484,102.105, Y=4,955,418.057 5 Year Pumping Volume (1825 days) Pumping Volume (Q): 469.030 m3/day 16,563.638 cu.ft./day 86.045 gal./min. 123,904.617 gal./day Water Producing Zone Thickness (L): 50.902 m 167.000 ft. Effective Porosity (n): 0.056 Original (CFR) Radius: 309.170 m 1,014.337 ft. 1st Bearing from Well = 325°from North. WeII#=731113 APPLE VALLEY 19 X=485,964.881, Y=4,954,768.393 5 Year Pumping Volume (1825 days) Pumping Volume (Q): 251.860 m3/day8,894.352 cu.ft./day 46.204 gal./min. 66,534.373 gal./day Water Producing Zone Thickness (L): 56.693 m 186.000 ft. Effective Porosity (n): 0.056 Original (CFR) Radius: 214.673 m 704.309 ft. 1st Bearing from Well = 105°from North. WeII#=778046 APPLE VALLEY 20 X=485,144.382,Y=4,954,029.021 5 Year Pumping Volume (1825 days) Pumping Volume (Q): 1,347.130 m3/day47,573.446 cu.ft./day 247.135 gal./min. 355,874.095 gal./day Water Producing Zone Thickness (L): 59.741 m 196.000 ft. Effective Porosity (n): 0.056 Original (CFR) Radius: 483.651 m 1,586.780 ft. 1st Bearing from Well = 135°from North. 1-Year CFR WeII#=205820 APPLE VALLEY 4 X=484,540.000, Y=4,954,771.000 1 Year Pumping Volume (365 days) Pumping Volume (Q): 611.780 m3/day 21,604.806 cu.ft./day 112.233 gal./min. 161,615.178 gal./day Water Producing Zone Thickness (L): 12.192 m 40.000 ft. Effective Porosity (n): 0.056 Original (CFR) Radius: 322.654 m 1,058.578 ft. WeII#=207677 APPLE VALLEY 5 X=484,409.722,Y=4,954,356.971 1 Year Pumping Volume (365 days) Pumping Volume (Q): 367.760 m3/day 12,987.322 cu.ft./day 67.467 gal./min. 97,151.914 gal./day Water Producing Zone Thickness (L): 57.912 m 190.000 ft. Effective Porosity (n): 0.056 Original (CFR) Radius: 114.782 m 376.583 ft. WeII#= 127263 APPLE VALLEY 6 X=484,418.000, Y=4,954,576.000 1 Year Pumping Volume (365 days) Pumping Volume (Q): 3,932.170 m3/day 138,863.271 cu.ft./day 721.368 gal./min. 1,038,769.415 gal./day Water Producing Zone Thickness (L): 60.046 m 197.000 ft. Effective Porosity (n): 0.056 Original (CFR) Radius: 368.598 m 1,209.311 ft. WeII#= 127277 APPLE VALLEY 7 X=484,365.453,Y=4,954,013.574 1 Year Pumping Volume (365 days) Pumping Volume (Q): 3,676.660 m3/day 129,840.021 cu.ft./day 674.494 gal./min. 971,270.814 gal./day Water Producing Zone Thickness (L): 59.436 m 195.000 ft. Effective Porosity (n): 0.056 Original (CFR) Radius: 358.244 m 1,175.343 ft. WeII#= 127297 APPLE VALLEY 8 X=484,845.170,Y=4,954,777.417 1 Year Pumping Volume (365 days) Pumping Volume (Q): 338.400 m3/day 11,950.483 cu.ft./day 62.080 gal./min. 89,395.822 gal./day Water Producing Zone Thickness (L): 57.302 m 188.000 ft. Effective Porosity (n): 0.056 Original (CFR) Radius: 110.689 m 363.154 ft. WeII#= 151561 APPLE VALLEY 9 X=484,084.000,Y=4,954,839.000 1 Year Pumping Volume (365 days) Pumping Volume (Q): 3,298.480 m3/day 116,484.720 cu.ft./day 605.115 gal./min. 871,366.228 gal./day Water Producing Zone Thickness (L): 54.559 m 179.000 ft. Effective Porosity (n): 0.056 Original (CFR) Radius: 354.161 m 1,161.945 ft. WeII#= 151563 APPLE VALLEY 10 X=485,368.037,Y=4,954,774.184 1 Year Pumping Volume (365 days) Pumping Volume (Q): 4,289.900 m3/day 151,496.387 cu.ft./day 786.994 gal./min. 1,133,271.683 gal./day Water Producing Zone Thickness (L): 63.094 m 207.000 ft. Effective Porosity (n): 0.056 Original (CFR) Radius: 375.585 m 1,232.235 ft. WeII#= 191943 APPLE VALLEY 11 X=485,236.669,Y=4,955,164.844 1 Year Pumping Volume (365 days) Pumping Volume (Q): 3,473.920 m3/day 122,680.325 cu.ft./day 637.300 gal./min. 917,712.572 gal./day Water Producing Zone Thickness (L): 52.730 m 173.000 ft. Effective Porosity (n): 0.056 Original (CFR) Radius: 369.706 m 1,212.947 ft. WeII#=449257 APPLE VALLEY 12 X=485,223.762,Y=4,954,398.270 1 Year Pumping Volume (365 days) Pumping Volume (Q): 775.390 m3/day 27,382.639 cu.ft./day 142.247 gal./min. 204,836.367 gal./day Water Producing Zone Thickness (L): 56.388 m 185.000 ft. Effective Porosity (n): 0.056 Original (CFR) Radius: 168.906 m 554.152 ft. Well#=433284 APPLE VALLEY 13 X=485,612.811,Y=4,954,386.231 1 Year Pumping Volume (365 days) Pumping Volume (Q): 1,549.410 m3/day54,716.897 cu.ft./day 284.244 gal./min. 409,310.818 gal./day Water Producing Zone Thickness (L): 60.046 m 197.000 ft. Effective Porosity (n): 0.056 Original (CFR) Radius: 231.377 m 759.111 ft. WeII#=205823 APPLE VALLEY 16 X=483,705.111,Y=4,953,424.000 1 Year Pumping Volume (365 days) Pumping Volume (Q): 1,190.460 m3/day42,040.698 cu.ft./day 218.393 gal./min. 314,486.260 gal./day Water Producing Zone Thickness (L): 52.121 m 171.000 ft. Effective Porosity (n): 0.056 Original (CFR) Radius: 217.685 m 714.191 ft. WeII#=603075 APPLE VALLEY 17 X=483,950.734,Y=4,953,653.296 1 Year Pumping Volume (365 days) Pumping Volume (Q): 2,028.800 m3/day 71,646.395 cu.ft./day 372.189 gal./min. 535,952.258 gal./day Water Producing Zone Thickness (L): 59.436 m 195.000 ft. Effective Porosity (n): 0.056 Original (CFR) Radius: 266.117 m 873.087 ft. WeII#=674495 APPLE VALLEY 18 X=484,102.105,Y=4,955,418.057 1 Year Pumping Volume (365 days) Pumping Volume (Q): 1,563.420 m3/day 55,211.655 cu.ft./day 286.814 gal./min. 413,011.868 gal./day Water Producing Zone Thickness (L): 50.902 m 167.000 ft. Effective Porosity (n): 0.056 Original (CFR) Radius: 252.435 m 828.199 ft. WeII#=731113 APPLE VALLEY 19 X=485,964.881,Y=4,954,768.393 1 Year Pumping Volume (365 days) Pumping Volume (Q): 839.520 m3/day 29,647.369 cu.ft./day 154.012 gal./min. 221,777.720 gal./day Water Producing Zone Thickness (L): 56.693 m 186.000 ft. Effective Porosity (n): 0.056 Original (CFR) Radius: 175.279 m 575.061 ft. WeII#=778046 APPLE VALLEY 20 X=485,144.382, Y=4,954,029.021 1 Year Pumping Volume (365 days) Pumping Volume (Q): 4,490.420 m3/day 158,577.683 cu.ft./day 823.780 gal./min. 1,186,243.462 gal./day Water Producing Zone Thickness (L): 59.741 m 196.000 ft. Effective Porosity (n): 0.056 Original (CFR) Radius: 394.898 m 1,295.599 ft. APPENDIX C DAP-ATP - CJDN AND OPDC April-2020-5013AEN01 LREe WATER 0 LRW Water Environmental Health Division /VIrnH Drinking Water Protection Section 64975 Determination of Aquifer Properties and Source Water Protection Unit StP.O.B 1,Minnesota 55164-0975 Aquifer Test Plan (DAP-ATP) Form Public Water Supply ID: 1190001 PWS Name: City of Apple Valley Contact Information for Person Completing this Form Name: Roscoe Sopiwnik 1861 Ashland Ave Address: City, State, Zip: Saint Paul, Minnesota Phone, Fax, e-mail: 651-341-8199 Aquifer Properties Determination Methods For Methods 1 - 5, check all that apply- attach Summary of Aquifer Properties Based on Existing Data vi 1 An existing pumping test that meets the requirements of wellhead protection rule part 4720.5520 and that was previously conducted on a well connected to the public water supply system. An existing pumping test that meets the requirements of wellhead protection rule part 4720.5520 and 2. that was previously conducted on another well in a hydrogeologic setting determined by the department to be equivalent. An existing pumping test that does not meet the requirements of wellhead protection rule part 3. 4720.5520 and that was previously conducted on: 1) a public water supply well or 2) another well in a hydrogeologic setting determined by the department to be equivalent. Existing specific capacity test(s) conducted on the public water supply well(s)or specific capacity tests 4' conducted on other wells in a hydrogeologic setting determined by the department to be equivalent. 5. An existing published transmissivity value. For Method 6 or 7 - attach detailed Aquifer Test Plan for Proposed Test A proposed new test to be conducted on a new or existing well connected to the public water supply 6. system and that meets the requirements for larger-sized water systems (wellhead protection rule part 4720.5520). The test plan must be approved before conducting the test. A proposed new test to be conducted on a new or existing public well connected to the public water n7. supply system and that meets the requirements for smaller-sized water systems (wellhead protection rule part 4720.5530). The test plan must be approved before conducting the test. List the unique number of each public water supply well to which this DAP-ATP Form applies 205820 (4) 207677 (5) 127263 (6) 127277 (7) 127297 (8) 151561 (9) 151563 (10) 191943 (11)' 449257 (12) 433284 (13) 205823 (16) 603075 (17) 674495 (18) 731113 (19) 778046 (20) Submitted by: David S. Hume Prof. License: 30488 Date: 11/3/2019 Reviewed by:Amal Djerrari Approved: 0 Yes 0 No Approval Date: 11/19/2019 Summary of Aquifer Properties Based on Existing Data Aquifer Name:Jordan Sandstone Aquifer Aquifer Code: Cj or CJDN Hydraulic Confinement Confined Unconfined Fractured Rock Aquifer Test Number of test(s) on file used to compile the information tabulated below: MDH Test No. 2288 Aquifer Properties Summary Table Representative Values Unit Range _ +/- Minimum Maximum Top Stratigraphic Elev. 575 feet (MSL) Bottom Stratigraphic Elev. 485 feet (MSL) Transmissivity(T) 11,500 ft2/day 8,000 11,500 Aquifer Thickness (b) 90 feet Saturated Thickness* (b) feet Hydraulic Conductivity (k) 128 ft/day 89 128 Primary Porosity (en) 0.21 0.00 Secondary Porosity** (es) 0.00 Storativity (S) 2.1e-4 dimensionless Characteristic Leakage (L) 7000 feet Hydraulic Resistance (c) 4700 days Notes: Shaded fields are required - * hydraulically unconfined aquifer- ** dual porosity aquifer because of fractures or solution weathering Describe rationale for selected method(s). Attach documentation and analysis. Information included above is from MDH re-analysis (Justin Blum)of the Well No. 6 (127263) pumping test conducted on January 1, 2000 in the Jordan Sandstone Aquifer. The range in T values from 8,000 ft2/day to 11,500 ft2/day reflects MDH comments from the analysis. The May 9, 2013 MDH memo discussing and presenting the analysis results is attached for reference. Aquifer Test Plan for Proposed Test Aquifer Name: Aquifer Code: Hydraulic Confinement Confined Unconfined Fractured Rock Proposed New Test Information Summary Pumped Well Test Duration Name(Unique Number): (Hours): UTM-X Pump Type: Location: X,Y UTM-Z15N (meters) UTM-Y or Latitude-Longitude (decimal degrees) Latitude Proposed Discharge datum: NAD83 Rate (units): Longitude Number of Type of Flow Rate Observation Wells: Measuring Device: Describe a new test to be conducted on the pumped well referenced above.Include unique well numbers of all wells that will be monitored during data collection. How does the existing or proposed test deviate from the ideal. (i.e.: rate,duration, number of obwells,interfering wells,etc.) A map showing the location of the pumping well and any observation well(s) must be included. Plan must state what will be done to dispose of well discharge. Environmental Health Division /VIrnH Drinking Water Protection Section 64975 Determination of Aquifer Properties and Source Water Protection Unit StP.O.B 1,Minnesota 55164-0975 Aquifer Test Plan (DAP-ATP) Form Public Water Supply ID: 1190001 PWS Name: City of Apple Valley Contact Information for Person Completing this Form Name: Roscoe Sopiwnik 1861 Ashland Ave Address: City, State, zip: Saint Paul, Minnesota Phone, Fax, e-mail: 651-341-8199 Aquifer Properties Determination Methods For Methods 1 - 5, check all that apply- attach Summary of Aquifer Properties Based on Existing Data 1 An existing pumping test that meets the requirements of wellhead protection rule part 4720.5520 and that was previously conducted on a well connected to the public water supply system. An existing pumping test that meets the requirements of wellhead protection rule part 4720.5520 and 2. that was previously conducted on another well in a hydrogeologic setting determined by the department to be equivalent. An existing pumping test that does not meet the requirements of wellhead protection rule part 3. 4720.5520 and that was previously conducted on: 1) a public water supply well or 2) another well in a hydrogeologic setting determined by the department to be equivalent. Existing specific capacity test(s) conducted on the public water supply well(s)or specific capacity tests 4' conducted on other wells in a hydrogeologic setting determined by the department to be equivalent. ✓ 5. An existing published transmissivity value. For Method 6 or 7 - attach detailed Aquifer Test Plan for Proposed Test A proposed new test to be conducted on a new or existing well connected to the public water supply 6. system and that meets the requirements for larger-sized water systems (wellhead protection rule part 4720.5520). The test plan must be approved before conducting the test. A proposed new test to be conducted on a new or existing public well connected to the public water n7. supply system and that meets the requirements for smaller-sized water systems (wellhead protection rule part 4720.5530). The test plan must be approved before conducting the test. List the unique number of each public water supply well to which this DAP-ATP Form applies 205823 (16) Submitted by: David S. Hume Prof. License: 30488 Date: 11/25/19 Reviewed by:Amal Djerrari Approved: 0 Yes 0 No Approval Date: 12/4/2019 Summary of Aquifer Properties Based on Existing Data Aquifer Name: Prairie du Chien Aquifer Aquifer Code: Op or OPDC Hydraulic Confinement Confined Unconfined Fractured Rock Aquifer Test Number of test(s) on file used to compile the information tabulated below: MDH Test No. 2288 Aquifer Properties Summary Table Representative Values Unit Range _ +/- Minimum Maximum Top Stratigraphic Elev. 731 feet (MSL) Bottom Stratigraphic Elev. 542 feet (MSL) Transmissivity(T) 5520 ft2/day 5520 5520 Aquifer Thickness (b) 189 feet Saturated Thickness* (b) feet Hydraulic Conductivity (k) 29.2 ft/day 29.2 29.2 Primary Porosity (en) 0.056 0.00 Secondary Porosity** (es) 0.00 Storativity (S) dimensionless Characteristic Leakage (L) feet Hydraulic Resistance (c) days Notes: Shaded fields are required - * hydraulically unconfined aquifer- ** dual porosity aquifer because of fractures or solution weathering Describe rationale for selected method(s). Attach documentation and analysis. Information included above is from the City of Apple Valleys original 2003 Part 1 WHP Plan, which references a transmissivity (T)value for the OPDC from a Dakota County groundwater model (select pages from the City's 2003 Part 1 WHP Plan attached). The T value of 5,520 ft2/day is considered representative of the OPDC at Well No. 16. Aquifer Test Plan for Proposed Test Aquifer Name: Aquifer Code: Hydraulic Confinement Confined Unconfined Fractured Rock Proposed New Test Information Summary Pumped Well Test Duration Name(Unique Number): (Hours): UTM-X Pump Type: Location: X,Y UTM-Z15N (meters) UTM-Y or Latitude-Longitude (decimal degrees) Latitude Proposed Discharge datum: NAD83 Rate (units): Longitude Number of Type of Flow Rate Observation Wells: Measuring Device: Describe a new test to be conducted on the pumped well referenced above.Include unique well numbers of all wells that will be monitored during data collection. How does the existing or proposed test deviate from the ideal. (i.e.: rate,duration, number of obwells,interfering wells,etc.) A map showing the location of the pumping well and any observation well(s) must be included. Plan must state what will be done to dispose of well discharge. ••• •••• ••••• •••• ••• city of Apple Valley Wellhead Protection Plan — Phase 1 January 2003 City of Apple Valley Wellhead Protection Plan — Phase 1 Wellhead Protection Area and Drinking Water Supply Management Area Delineation and Vulnerability Assessments January 2003 4.1.2.1.4 Groundwater Flow Field According to the 1990 Geologic Atlas of Dakota County [4], groundwater flow within the Prairie du Chien-Jordan Aquifer in Apple Valley is north and northwestward toward the Minnesota River. Groundwater flow in the Mount Simon-Hinckley Aquifer is influenced locally and regionally by high capacity wells in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. Specifically, the groundwater flow direction of the Mount Simon-Hinckley Aquifer in the Apple Valley area is thought to be northeastward toward the Minnesota River Valley. There is a significant cone of depression from the Mount Simon-Hinckley Aquifer present in Minneapolis. 4.1.2.1.5 Aquifer Transmissivity The transmissivity used in the Jordan Aquifer was obtained through the analysis of an aquifer pumping test performed in the City of Apple Valley. The test was conducted by the city with the assistance of the MDH in December 1999 and January 2000. The aquifer test data were analyzed by both the MDH and Dakota County staff using the deGlee method for leaky aquifers. The results of the analysis is found in Appendix C. The test is assumed to meet the requirements for a Wellhead Protection Aquifer Test. Based on the results of the aquifer pumping test, an aquifer transmissivity of 7,000 ft2/day (650 m2/day) was used in the groundwater flow model for the Jordan Sandstone Aquifer. Based on results of the Dakota County Groundwater Model, a value of 5,520 ft2/day (513 m2/day)was used for the Prairie du Chien. The transmissivity used in the Mount Simon-Hinckley pumping test was done through analysis of an aquifer pumping test performed in the City of Apple Valley. An aquifer pump test was performed in June of 2001. The test data were analyzed by SEH for the City of Burnsville Wellhead Protection plan [16], and a transmissivity of approximately 2,460 ft2/day (228.54 m2/day) and a storativity of 0.00039 were chosen as being representative of the Mount Simon-Hinckley Aquifer in the area. This result aligns with values published in the 1978 MGS Hydrogeologic Map of Minnesota: Bedrock Hydrogeology [11], and the 1986 USGS Hydrogeologic Framework and Properties of Regional Aquifers in the Hollandale Embayment, Southeastern Minnesota: Hydrologic Investigations Atlas [10]. A copy of the aquifer pumping test report is included in Appendix D. 4.1.3 Quality and Quantity of Water Supplying Municipal Wells Public water supplies in Apple Valley are regularly sampled and analyzed for contamination as regulated under the federal Safe Drinking Water Act. As discussed in Section 2.3.4.2, to date, contaminants have not been detected in the public water supplies above regulatory limits. The Prairie du Chien-Jordan Aquifer appears to still be a viable source of public water supplies for the city. The Mount Simon-Hinckley Aquifer is no longer a potential source of groundwater supplies under current regulatory,political, and hydrogeologic conditions. 12 APPENDIX D WELL 6 2000 AQUIFER TEST ANALYSIS AND 2013 REANALYSIS April—2020—5013AEN01 LREe WATER 0 LRW Water Appendix C Aquifer Test Analysis, Jordan Aquifer An aquifer test was performed by the City of Apple Valley on January 6 and 7, 2000 with the assistance of Steve Robertson, MDH, and William Olsen, Dakota County Environmental Management. Well 6 was pumped at approximately 1,200 gallons per minute for 20 hours, and heads were recorded in Apple Valley Municipal Wells 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13 by the city's SCADA system. The collected data is of good quality, and was analyzed using the deGlee method for steady state drawdown in a two aquifer system with a leaky layer and constant head in the second aquifer. The Jordan Aquifer is part of a multiaquifer system. It is separated from the Franconia Aquifer below by the St. Lawrence formation, and is separated from the Prairie du Chien Aquifer above by a part of the Oneota member of the Prairie du Chien. The resistivity of the St. Lawrence is roughly two orders of magnitude greater than that of the Oneota, for this reason the lower aquifer and confining unit are ignored in the test analysis. The observation wells are all completed in the Jordan Aquifer, and most of the SCADA recorders have a resolution of 1/8 foot. It should be noted that there are two known multiaquifer wells in the vicinity, the Oscar Roberts well (Minnesota Unique Well No. 205821) and Apple Valley No. 16. Both of these wells are open into both the Jordan and the Prairie du Chien Aquifers, and so may have affected the results of the analysis. The Oscar Roberts well is only 1,100 feet from Well 6. This well was logged at a later date by Robert Tipping and Anthony Runkel of the MGS using a flow meter. At that time, drawdown in the Oscar Roberts well was observed when Well 6 was activated. The deGlee analysis is much simplified and ignores all other boundary effects, such as multiaquifer wells. The resistivity of the Oneota could have been better determined in this test if there had been observations in the Prairie du Chien Aquifer. Toward this goal, a data logger was installed in the Oscar Roberts well for this test, but it failed to collect useful data. Another data logger was installed for this test in a nearby monitoring well open in the upper St. Peter Aquifer (Minnesota Unique Well Number 616549). Observations here were dominated by barometric effects and did not show significant response to the pumping of Well 6. This justifies ignoring the St. Peter Aquifer in this analysis. Well 6 was pumped for 20 hours at an average rate of between 1,196 gallons per minute, as measured on the flow meter, and 1,266 gallons per minute, as measured on the cumulator. Drawdown came close to stabilizing at 20 hours; the drawdowns at that time were analyzed. The drawdown in Well 10 was not recorded accurately, and an estimated drawdown was substituted. Figure C1 shows the drawdown in all of the wells sorted by their distance from Well 6. Figure C2 shows the test layout in plan view. The deGlee parameters of Transmissivity and Resistivity were fit using a least squared error solution, with error being the difference between measured and theoretical drawdown. All measured drawdowns were given a weight of 1.0, with two exceptions: the drawdown at Well 6 itself was weighted 0.01, and the estimated drawdown at Well 10 was weighted 0.1. The analysis results are shown and summarized in Figure C3. Apple Valley Pump Test Data January 6 & 7, 2000 100.000 - —W6 - W5 15 a 10.000 — W4 4- W9 O + —W8 i —W7 o ,i,' - W12 O 1 1 .000 - �.' —W 10 l � — W11 il 1 n_ — W13 0.100 1 1 1 10 100 1000 10000 Log Elapsed Time (minutes) I I c11 )_____ .. ,1 _ 1 In ,-ell, 9PØGJDN • 09 U4 • 08 10 - A •0 • • 12 •-1'� • 05 - 7616549 (Monitoring Well - OS i . -.,; • 07 - _. . • - A = 4 A n16 (OPDC - CJDN) A ; - A A A A♦ Al A _ -� -- - A t A A 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 Feet N if w it r S Apple Valley Pump Test Analysis Well 6, 127263, 1/6/2000 1 Deglee Solution. Krusemann &deRidder pg 76. 7742 T Transmissivity 1250 Q (gal/min) 2588 c Resistivity 240610 Q (cft/day) 4476 L Characteristic Length 4476 r_m - Match Point r 100 H Aquifer Thickness 4.946 s_m - Match Point s 77 k Permeability Log-Log plot of r/s • Data Deglee + Match Pt I I 1 11001 _I 1 I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I J J_L 1 J a Y-1--1-t-11 Yt -,- 1-1-.r 1-1.r____y__y._t_1_r Yrr____-1__j._q.--I-rr-I I--1-r T-1 Yt t--r-I--I--I--I- - Y -1 trttr-___y__7_Y-I-rYrr____�__t_T__rYl-I t--r-rr--r-I- 1-r-+ii} 1-1-1-+++1-____1__+_1_I_}}F I -I--}_+__ +-- -F-I--I--I. L __ __J_S_L111L____J__1_1_1_LL_1_ I 1_L___LL1_ I I I -1-1-L 4-14.6 -1--I-1-4- 1 I 1 I I LLI- I 1 1 I 1 I 1 +--L-L�--i-_I_ 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I- I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 i1I11 I I 1 I 1 I y 1 1 ...r I I W I I I I I I r I I I I 1 W I I I I I I i I I 1 N J J L 1 J_1./ '- I I 1 I i J J L 1 1 1 L_---J__1_1__L L LI J 1 ILL ---1__L_L J__L_I. -I--I-r ty Yt j1 I1 1 1 1 I I 1 r I I I I I I I I 1 ♦ I I I--- 1_ 1 J J L 1 1 1 L J J L 1 1 1 L____J__1_1__L 1 L L 1-_1_1__L L L_ 1-- 1 I I I 11 I I 11 1 ---- -1----I- 1 11 I 11 I I I r 1 r T Tr T 1 r i I 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 --_-I" 1 11 1 11 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 J I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 0.1 1 10 r(ft) 100 1000 10000 Figure C3. Pump Test Analysis. MINNESOTA M DH Memo DEPARTMENToFHEAETH Date: May 9, 2013 To: Apple Valley WHP Project File (PWSID: 1190001) From: Justin Blum Subject: Re-analysis of the Well 6 (127263)Pumping Test, January 1, 2000, Jordan Sandstone Aquifer MDH Test No. 2288 The pumping test performed on Apple Valley 6 (127263) was conducted as described below and summarized in Tables 1 and 2. The data were analyzed using standard methods cited in the references. Analysis graphs are presented in Appendix 1 and are summarized in Table 3. Appendix 2 contains observations, field notes, and any other documentation. These data were re-analyzed to check for well efficiency and other issues by the comparison of transient and steady-state analysis techniques. Result Summary Conceptual model: leaky confined, radial porous media flow Representative aquifer values: Transmissivity (T): 11,500 ft2/day Aquifer Thickness (b): 90 feet Hydraulic Conductivity (k): 128 ft/day Storativity (S): 2.1e-4 Leakage (L): 7000 feet (minimum) Hydraulic Resistance ( c ): 4700 days Boundaries: leakage / aquifer heterogeneity Remarks: quality of results, constraints [+/-] on T, etc. Indications of aquifer heterogeneity - pumped well and nearest obwell show lower T, —8000 ft2/day, relative to bulk aquifer T. Test Type: X Constant Rate II Variable Rate C Recovery ❑ Step Drawdown LI Other (Describe) ❑ Data scanned ❑ Data entered into database Environmental Health Division• 121 East Seventh Place•Suite 220• St.Paul,MN 55101 •651/215-0700 www.health.state.mn.us Table 1. Aquifer Test Information Test Location Apple Valley 6 Well Owner City of Apple Valley Test Conducted By / For City of Apple Valley, Dakota Co., and MDH Aquifer Jordan Sandstone Confined / Unconfined Confined Date/Time Monitoring Start 01/05/2000 08:00:00.00 Date/Time Pump off Before Test >24 hours Date/Time Pumping Start 01/06/2000 08:05:30.00 Date/Time Recovery Start 01/07/2000 08:02:30.00 Date/Time Test Finish 01/08/2000 08:06:00.00 Flow Rate 1250 gpm at test start, 1200 at end Data Collection Methods SCADA system Number of Observation Wells 9 Table 2. Wells Monitored During the Test Static Water Levels (feet below measuring point) Ty a) > Well Name Radial m a� -I (Unique Well No.) Distance i ,13 ina > c r V Aquifer m uJ V Pumped Well: AV-6 (127263) 1 111.3 152.9 111.8 41.4 CJDN Ob Wells: AV-4 (127263) 751 110.4 118.3 111.4 7.4 CJDN AV-5 (205820) 723 112.4 125.0 112.8 12.4 CJDN AV-7 (207677) 1858 83.8 88.1 84.3 4.1 CJDN AV-8 (127277) 2091 104.6 111.0 105.4 6.0 CJDN AV-9 (127297) 1407 100.9 107.8 101.4 6.6 CJDN AV-10 (151561) 3164 97.3 101.92 100.8 2.9 CJDN AV-11 (151563) 3275 53.1 56.4 53.0 3.4 CJDN AV-12 (191943) 2691 106.6 110.5 107.1 3.7 CJDN AV-13 (449257) 3957 110.1 113.3 110.6 3.0 CJDN Table 3. Analysis Results Transient Analysis Well Name Storage Transmissivity, Plot No. (Unique Well Coefficient, Analysis Method Remarks No.) T (ft2/day) S Pumped Well: AV-6 (127263) 3,830 NA Theis Al-1 Ob Wells: AV-4 (127263) 10,200 2.1e-4 Theis Al-2 AV-5 (205820) 6,120 5.9e-5 Theis Al-3 AV-7 (207677) 15,300 2.1e-4 Theis Al-4 AV-8 (127277) 10,200 5.4e-5 Theis Al-5 AV-9 (127297) 9,180 1.7e-4 Theis A1-6 AV-10 (151561) Well interference, see plot A1-14 AV-11 (151563) Well interference, see plot A1-14 AV-12 (191943) 10,800 1.6e-4 Theis A1-7 AV-13 (449257) 14,100 1.5e-4 Theis A1-8 Distance 11,500 2.6e-4 Theis, t/r2 A1-9 Pumping Drawdown 11,500 1.3e-4 Theis, t/r2 Al-10 Recovery Analysis 7,980 5.5e-5 Theis, t/r2 Al-11 Match to Well 6 and Well 5 Steady-state Analysis Transmissivity, Characteristic Hydraulic Leakage, L Resistance, Analysis Method Plot No. T (ft2/day) Remarks (feet) c (days) 7,700 5460 3870 Hantush-Jacob A1-12 - fit 1 includes pumping well 11,500 7960 5710 .. A1-12 - fit 2 excludes pumping well 9,180 7000 5430 de Glee A1-13 Consistency between conceptual models shown by red and blue values Test Description See documentation Evaluation of Test Results Hydraulic response affected by: aquifer heterogeneity in the vicinity of the pumping well, as shown by differences in 'T' between plots Al-10 and Al-11. Also, individual analyses of T for wells 6 and 5 (plots Al-1 and A1-3) are consistently low relative to other wells. Aquifer properties best represented by: Theis Distance-Drawdown of recovery data and steady-state plots that exclude pumping well. T in vicinity of pumping well is �25% smaller than aquifer as a whole. This zone of low T causes an excess drawdown in the pumped well, as if the well efficiency were 0.73. The orientation of this zone is likely to be in the direction of a line between wells 6 and 5, roughly north-south, because well 4 does not show a low T at a similar radial distance. Plot A1-13 gives smallest reasonable T and L for aquifer as a whole. Consistency with conceptual model: consistent with model of sandstone aquifer receiving recharge from leakage. And, consistent with depositional model: areas of lower T as a result of secondary feldspathic cementation or localized silty dolomitic sandstone at top of unit, i.e.: Coon Valley Member. Note that alternative explanations for differences in T between wells exist. For instance, it may have been caused by errors in calibration of the SCADA sensors in wells 6 and 5 versus the other wells. Selected References: Cooper, H.H. and Jacob, C.E. (1946) A Generalized Graphical Method for Evaluating Formation Constants and Summarizing Well-filed History, Trans. American Geophysical Union, V. 27, pp. 526 — 534. de Glee, G. (1930) Over grondwaterstroomingen bij wateronttrekking door middle van putten. Ph.D. thesis, Delft Technische Hogeschool, Delft. de Glee Method [English] in: Kruseman and De Ridder, (1991) Analysis and Evaluation of Pumping Test Data (2nd Edition), Publication 47, International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement, P.O. Box 45, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp. 76-78. Hantush, M. S. and Jacob, C.E. (1955b) Steady Three-dimensional Flow to a Well in a Two- layered Aquifer, Trans. American Geophysical Union, Vol. 36, pp. 286-292. Hantush, M. S., (1960) Modification of the Theory of Leaky Aquifers, Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 65, pp. 3713-25. Theis, C. V., (1935) The Relation Between the Lowering of the Piezometric Surface and the Rate and Duration of Discharge of a Well Using Ground-Water Storage, Trans. American Geophysical Union, 16th Annual Meeting, April, 1935, pp. 519-24. Walton, W.C., (1960) Leaky Artesian Aquifer Conditions In Illinois, Illinois State Water Survey, Bulletin 39, pp. 27. Appendix 1 Graphical Analysis Test of Apple Valley 6 (127623) January 6, 2000 Composite of Pumping and Recovery Data T = 15.3 * 1250 / 5 = 3830 ft2/day 100 I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I L I I I I L I I I I L I I I I I I _I I I I 11 I I I I I I I I + - - - I - I + I I- - - -I - I- + - I _I I- - - - I - + -I -I I- I + I - - - - - - - - II I I� � .^�+^^", O • I I I I I I I I I I0 I I I I I I 1 I + 0 1. + + cn 10 - - Match Point - - - - - I - - - I- } - I - I- I - I + I + -I I- + I- I -I I-� - I - � -I -I I- I 1/u, W(u) = 1 0 - - + - I - I- I - I + - - -I - I- + I- I -I I-I - - - I I I I I I + I _ _ > - ,� - - N J I 74 L I pumping CO I + recovery 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I - X match point I I 0) 1 II /E "./ _ I _ I - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0 - - - - - - 0.1 I I i I I 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 Time from Start of Pumping or Recovery (minutes) Test of Apple Valley 6 (127623) at Apple Valley 5 (207677) January 6, 2000 T = 15.3 * 1200 / 3 = 6120 ft2/day Composite of Pumping and Recovery Data S - 6120 * 1 .8 / (723^2 *360) = 5.9e-5 100 1111 1 III 11111 1 III I I L I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I _I I I I 11 I I I I IIIII -II- - - F - I - I- I - I + I + - - -I - I- + I- I -I I-I - - - I - -I -I -I I- I + 1 - - - I- -I - I - I -I I-II- I II III III .......... III A . 1 II I I 4— u) 10 I /a _ _ _ F _ _ _ _ + 1 + - - - 1,�:;���,:•,••- + I_ I -I I-I - - - I - -I -1 -I I- I 4 1 - - - I- -I - I - I -I I-I I- go. > I I I Match Point I I I ,nj1,•_ I I Rf I I I L ►„ IOI NI I I I I I I ., I o 0 + I �J I I 4 0 1l l I 1+ 1 I II •}�'il� I Q I V 1 I C I ca I T TII I T 7 1 I U o- o 1 + + ll II II II 0.1 II II II 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 Time from Start of Pumping (minutes) Test of Apple Valley 6 (127623) at Apple Valley 4 (205820) T = 15.3 * 1200 / 1.8 = 10200 ft2/day January 6, 2000 S = 10200 * 4.2 / (751^2 *360) = 2.1 e-4 Composite of Pumping and Recovery Data 10 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 _ -�- - 1 I I I I I `,,11I1•.; - - - - - - -I - - - - I + I + - - -I VII * • I-I - - - I - - -I -I 1- 1 i - - - - - - -I - - Match Point `"'°� I I I ��<�bI I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1/u, W(u) = 1 ��Jp�titi* - I, ( V 1 I I I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 1 I I I 1i� 1 I II "" I I I I I I I I II I o /IP O 1 - - - - - - -I -I I- - - t - - - I - I +, + - - -I - I- + 1- I -I I-I - - - 1 - - -I -I I- I + I - - I- -1 - 1 - I -I I-I I- 0 I I- - - 4- - I - I- I - I''+ I ++ - - -I - I- + I- I -I I-I - - - 1 - -1 -I -I 1- 1 + I - - 1- -1 - 1 - I -I I-I I- > 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I a) — o c I I L + 01 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 A . I I 1 1 1 _ I , 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I -1 1 1 1 1 4 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • + 1 1 1 1 + II I I I I I I C) 0.1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I C - = - I T T I I T I T 7 1 I U I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.01 I I 0.1 10 100 1000 10000 Time from Start of Pumping or Recovery (minutes) Test of Apple Valley 6 (127623) at Apple Valley 7 (127277) January 6, 2000 T = 15.3 * 1200 / 1.2 = 15300 ft2/day Composite of Pumping and Rcovery Data S = 15300 * 17 / (1858^2 *360) = 2.1 e-4 10 I I I I I I II I - I I I I I 1 I I I I II 1 I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I L I I I I I _ 1 I I I 1 I I 1 I I -1 ,- - - 4- - I - I- I - I - -I - I- + I- I -I 1-I - - - I - - -I -I - - ..� Match Point I I I I I I I , NI I I I I I I I I I - 1/u, W(u) = 1 - I I I I I I I I I I„ ......... I I I I I I I I I I I I I I /IP J)D) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I V) 1 n» I- - - - III - - 4- - I - I- I - I + I + - - -I - I- a)- I -I I-I - - - I - -I -I -I I- I + 1 - - I- -I - I - I -I I-I I- (.\ - - - - - - I -I I-1 I- - - F - - - I - + I + - - -I - I- I- I -I I- - - - - -I -I -I I- I + - - - - - - I -I I-I I- - (: .» I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0:' :: w, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I A . I I I I I I 1 I 1 - I I 1 I I I I I I -I I I I 11 1 I I I I I I I C1 I I I I I I I I I I � T I I I I I I I 111 ..:�. I I I I I I I I 0.1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I r I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I E"./ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I — I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I U I I I I I I . . I I I I I I . . I I I I I I . . I I I I I I . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.01 I I I 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 Time fro Start of Pumping or Recovery (minutes) Test of Apple Valley 6 (127623) at Apple Valley 8 (127297) January 6, 2000 Composite of Pumping and Recovery Data T = 15.3 * 1200 / 1.8 = 10,200 ft2/day S = 10200 * 12 / (2691^2 * 360) = 4.7e-5e-4 10 I I I I I „ I I I I , I „ I I I I I I I I I „ I I I I , I „ I I I I L I I I I L 1 1 I I 1 I I I I I I Match Point 1/u, W(u) = 1 I I <N /�1 I I I I I I I i I AO I I I i 0)) N CO I I I I I I I I I I I y I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 -II-Il- - - F - I - I- I - I + I + - - ce. + I- + - I -II-I - - - I - -I -I -I I- I il - - - I- -I - I - I -II-II- N • +++ - - I- - - - -II-1 - - - I - I + 1 + - - -I - I- + - I -II-I - - - I - - -I -I I- I + - - - I- - - - I -II-Il- N 1 1 1 1 I I.+F e + I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I N f ++ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CO C Q) I I I I I I 1 I I I IO •O, I ++ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I C0.1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CO I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I UI I I I I I I I I I I I T I I I I T I I I I I I T I I I 17 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I 0.01 II II II 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 Time from Start of Pumping (minutes) Test of Apple Valley 6 (127623) at Apple Valley 9 (151561) January 6, 2000 T = 15.3 * 1200 / 2.0 = 9180 ft2/day Composite of Pumping and RecoveryData S = 9180 * 13 / (1407^2 * 360) = 1.7e-4 10 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i..111 - I I I I I I I I I I I I I_ I _ I 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I 11 I I I I I I I I I -I I- - - - Match Point - - -I - I- + I- I -I I-I - 1 - -1 -1 -1 1- 1 + I - - - 1- -1 - 1 - 1 -1 I-I I- I 1/u, W(u) = 1 1 I I I,.,:. 1 I I I I ql�. (Q (I) ((OV I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I I 1 4P I- - - - I I- - - + - - I- 1 - + I + - - ge,.. - 1- + 1 1 -1 I-I - - - 1 - - -1 -I 1- I + - - - 1- -1 - 1 - I -I I-I I- �--� . l�^11`)1 -I - - - + - - - 1 - + I + - - -1 - I- + I- I -I I-I - - - - -I -1 -I I- I + - - - - - - - 1 -1 I-I I- ra I I I I I I I I I I • 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I LL..� -F . 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I _1 1 1 1 1 4 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I CO 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I ^/ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CI1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1+ 1+ : 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 I I I 0.1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I T I I I I T I I I I I I T 1 1 1 1 7 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I I I 1 1 I 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 Time from Start of Pumping (minutes) Test of Apple Valley 6 (127623) at Apple Valley 12 (449257) January 6, 2000 T = 15.3 * 1200 / 1.7 = 10800 ft2/day Composite of Pumping and Recovery Data S = 10800 * 39 / (2691 A2 * 360) = 1.6e-4 10 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I L I I I I 1 I 1 I ILLIII I I J I I I 11 I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - -I I - - - 1 - - - - + I + I- + F I -I I- - - - - 1 -I -I I- I, - -1 - - - - - -I I-I I- I I I I I I I I I I Match Point I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1/u, VV(u) = 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I � I I I I I - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 A . (I) I I_ _ _ 1 - I _ I_ I _ I + I + - - -I - I- + F - I_I - - - I - 1 -I -I I_ I , I - - - I_ _I - I _ I -I I_I I_ `� I II I I I I I L I I I I L 11 1 I I I I I I J I I I 11 I I I I I I I I CoI I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.01 I 0.1 1 0 100 1000 10000 Time fro Start of Pumping (minutes) Test of Apple Valley 6 (127623) at Apple Valley 13 (433284) January 6, 2000 T = 15.3 * 1200 / 1 .3 = 14100 ft2/day Composite of Pumping and Recovery Data S = 14100 * 60 / (3957^2 * 360) = 1.5e-4 10 I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I L I I I I L 11 I I I L I I I I I J I I I I I I I I I _1 I_ - - - - - - -I I - - - + - - - - + I + I- + 1- I -I I- - - - - - -I -I I- I + - - - - - - -1 I-I 1- 1 I I I I 1 1 1 I I I I I I I ---\ I I I I I I I I I I Match Point 1 I I I I I I I "^ I I I I I I I W I I I I 1/u, W(u) - 1 I I I I I I N IC I (` 1 - I I_ _ _ � _ I . 1_ I . 1 + I + _ _ _1 _ I_ + � 1 .1 I_I _ _ 1 _ -1 _1 _I 1. 1 + I _ _ _ 1_ _I _ 1 _ I _1 1_I I_ ^` n/ I _ _ _ + - I _ I_ I _ 1 + I + - - -1 - I_ + F I _I I_I - - - I - -1 _I _I 1_ I + I - - - I_ _I - 1 _ I _1 1-1 1- W I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I J l^1L I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I III I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IA . CO I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i }mod) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I ;)) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I C0.1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I UI I I I 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 0.01 1 1 1 1 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 Time from Start of Pumping or Recovery (minutes) MDH Test No: 2288 Theis Distance-Drawdown Analysis T = 15.3 • Q • w(„) / sm Pumped Well: 6 (127263) S = T • tm• 1/u / 360 Test Date: 1/6/2000 Data Series: Pumping T = 15.3 * 1200 / 1.6 = 11475 ft2/day Discharge Rate: 1225 S = 11475 * 4e-006 / 360 = 0.0001275 102 6 o o a3,,„ Match Point 101 w(u), 1/u = 11 - 0 . 01111r:040.....MM 'I- F It p. -, 10° a) O a) Well 6 P I I --1 Well 5-P O Well 4 - P 1 I ❑ Well 9 - P c6 L X Well 8 - P 0 10-' 0 Well 7 - P 0 Well12 - P Well 13 - P 10-2 Time / Radial DistanceA2 (minutes/feet^2) 10-3 10-' 10-6 10-6 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-' 10° 101 102 103 104 MDH Test No: 2288 Theis Distance-Drawdown Analysis T = 15.3 • Q • w(„) / sm Pumped Well: 6 (127263) S = T • tm• 1/u / 360 Test Date: 1/6/2000 Data Series: Recovery T = 15.3 * 1200 / 1.6 = 11500 ft2/day Discharge Rate: 1200 S = 11500 * 0.000004 / 360 = 1.3e-4 102 Match Point -- • 101 W(u), 1/u = 11 0 0 - gym.■■ gym.■■ gym.■■ gym.■■ gym.■■.mom=.■■.m .111111111. \II -- 10° v. m O Well 6-R L `. + Well 5-R oA Well 7 - R AQ Well4 - R CC 10-1 I X Well 8 - R ❑ Well9 - R .' Well12 - R Well 13 - R 10-2 I Time / Radial DistanceA2 (minutes/feet^2) 10-3 10-' 10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-' 10° 101 102 103 104 MDH Test No: 2288 Theis Distance-Drawdown Analysis T = 15.3 • Q • w(„) / sm Pumped Well: 6 (127263) S = T • tm• 1/u / 360 Test Date: 1/6/2000 Data Series: Pumping T = 15.3 * 1200 / 2.3 = 7982.61 ft2/day Discharge Rate: 1225 S = 7982.61 * 2.5e-006 / 360 = 5.54348e-OOE 102 Match Point �T W(u), 1/u = 1 0 101 0 0 IV � ® A • 10° a� ti F O Well 6-R Well 5-R Q Well 4 - R 0 Well 7 - R 10-1 X Well 8 - R Well 9 - R • ■; Well 12 - R Well 13 - R 10-2 Time / Radial DistanceA2 (minutes/feet^2) 10-3 I 10-' 10-6 10-6 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-' 10° 101 102 103 104 60 Test of Apple Valley 6 (127263) 1/6/2000 T = 70.6 * 1200 / 11 = 7700ft2/day L = 6112 / 1.12 = 5460 ft. c = 5460^2/7700 = 3870 days T = 70.6 * 1200 / 7.6 = 11150 ft2/day L = 8920 / 1.12 = 7960 ft. c = 79601'2/11100 = 5710 days well no. unique distance drawdown comment 40 1 I 6 127263 1 41.58 Y=-4.761433193 * In(X)+41.51076862 5 207677 723 12.63 4 205820 751 7.88 9 151561 1407 6.88 8 127297 1543 6.38 7 127277 1858 4.38 12 449257 2691 3.88 10 151563 3164 3.00 (estimated) 11 191943 3275 3.25 13 433284 3957 3.13 20 Y = -3.314428345 * In(X) + 30.14734507 • • Distance from Pumped Well (feet) ' 0 - I I I I I I In I I 1 10 100 1000 10000 100000 1000 • Test of Apple Valley 6 (127263) — 1/6/2000 — T = 30.6 * 1200 / 4 = 9180 ft2/day • L = 7000 c = 7000^2/9180 = 5340 days 100 J m II 10 + Match Point K0(x), X = 1 o - well no. unique distance drawdown comment # 6 127263 1 41.58 5 207677 723 12.63 4 205820 751 7.88 9 151561 1407 6.88 1 8 127297 1543 6.38 7 127277 1858 4.38 12 449257 2691 3.88 • 10 151563 3164 3.00 (estimated) 11 191943 3275 3.25 . . . . . 13 433284 3957 3.13 Distance from Pumped Well (feet) 0.1 - I I I I I III I I 1 10 100 1000 10000 100000 MDH Test No: 2288 Theis Distance-Drawdown Analysis T = 15.3 • Q • w(„) / sm Pumped Well: 6 (127263) S = T • tm• 1/u / 360 Test Date: 1/6/2000 Data Series: Pumping T = 15.3 * 1200 / 1.6 = 11500 ft2/day Discharge Rate: 1225 S = 11500 * 0.000004 / 360 = 2.1 e-4 102 Match Point W(u), 1/u = 1 1I 1 0R� _ - u : i i • 4- • •� • ;_u• an O II OO . o 10 � O x H® 10"2 Time / Radial DistanceA2 (minutes/feet 2) 10-3 I.( 10-' 10-6 10-6 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-' 10° 101 102 103 104 Appendix 2 Documentation . _. ,,_. . ,. -iv ..... :: , :11 '-i;....7.41 . , F ! „tx Y •. � . r• Y• -, <4 , Q L s,. +- • ... N I -ri. -Y i ?. • i LW ` � 1 �f:;-:. r'". .Lfia .; J r j -. .,. ",..UrA_,'' D_ 1j irN:.?,A'-'.4';A'.6...."...c--!iil.t._ ..: t. J Ski'+ 1. J Y 11 J �ti�•.. a , y- rT �/' i. - '� 4. E` � � CO L { r '?st �I a 'y + L. ' q� Q. .pp jL ,TT ' .a ( • m 'cam 4``*4. 4 `�' Y z.1. vv... • f .a: - '.S W ��� + a Q i. r#= .� ` in ,� • ,..., > -i-,-A + ..... , ..•;""'s . • -U • '.1 • _• its } , ' , _ ; 4 W ; f a Rr d 4_ W _ �. .,.- y-. c W tr : 0- NI M. ., re • _ . il x > . S ;AA:6`t .° • , `-�.. :,� ,.. E ►^ • Q .• a 4. �iii• ill .�, C .v.. e'er/ L. L. • 4. . >� , {- ', { • T 3 Y�� I 4 r- k7 - ff I Y ' fC� • ' J' 1 '.= �*. =r f• ,, Minnesota Department of Health ,• Aquifer Test Information Special Services Unit TBSIND. M Drinking Water Protection Section P.O.Box 64975 Page 1 of St.Paul,Minnesota 55164-0975 (//0001 • Test Location Well Owner Test C nducted y AitAtt tit„,t(1 DatentiAe Test Start Flow Rate(Units) Pump Type /Zoo Date/Time Recovery Start Flow Rate Measuring Device Pump Intake Depth Date/Time Test Finish Totalizer: End Pumped Well Inner Casing Diameter Notes , Totalizer: Start Confined/Unconfined 5C/x-b ft C CoGK 1 .• Total Pumped(Units) Quad Sheet Name/Number Unique Well Location Location Radial Open Transducer Measuring Elevation, Numbers T, R, S, N, E Distance Depth Setting Point Location Datum Quarters Pumped Well E Observation OSCi L N X16 Wells E "77-66 (3 :5er 03) N t_p-ary 1,--ns4 3 (1)3 E N 6 ( 6Scil ------- z. (,6'-n-'0 rc26e_?_, E N E Sketch Map of Well Locations - ' IC#140-13524 (5/96) • background 101 . 703 - 31 . 137 101 . 185 30 . 557 100 . 666 29 . 977 tt 0 100 . 148 29 . 397 un g 99 . 630 28 . 817 99 . 111 28 . 237 98 . 593 - - 27 . 657 0 3442 6885 10328 13770 17212 20655 Time (Minutes) • [1] - Probe #1 • [2 ] - probe 2 • [0] - Barometric FLOW READINGS WELL # Co DATE I f -U, 0 8:00 AM L4_{ t (z 's C.) GPM IS $-0 Flow Meter(totalizer) gallons x 1000 8:05 AM (, L-1 j 37 GPM I a, 5� 8:10 AM y I ` tS GPM I ZS S 8:15 AM Lc-i GPM 1 .2. 8:20 AM (DL1 1 g ti:.3 GPM 1. 2-`, 8:25 AM 4 0 3GPM a ; 860 8:3 0 AM (j (��j GPM 1 xrc 8:3 5 AM (j I 1 7` GPM 8:40 AM ( -) 6 ( GPM I c1P-D OC 8:45 AM ES 1 I ()) (a , GGP� M S I C) �o 8:50 AM L(� 1 q �-( GPM 11 C) 7.0 8:55 AM (1 > Goo GPM j 2 P 0 ,LuC> 9:0 0 AM ���' 2,0 () GPM ( 2_, 1 0 SlOo 10:00AM G GPM 12_OG "2bco 11:00 AM k O(,) GPM (n) 2:00 PM (:), 88 GPM S (6, 8:00 PM (ya. rL GPM I D., 0 6 8:00 AM l; `�' 7 GPM f'` SHARED\UTILITY\CAROL\PUMPTST • • • • • • • . . . . . • • • Apple „ Valley Wellhead • • • • on Plan Update City Council Meeting July 23. 2020 Presented by: Advanced Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. (AE2S) AGENDA 1111®11 1 Wellhead Protection Plan • Background • Scope • Schedule • Part 1 Summary • Next Steps • Part 2 WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN :ib BACKGROUND _____ ✓ Required Under Minnesota Wellhead Protection Rules (4720.51 00 to 4720.5590) ✓ Under jurisdiction of Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN 1% BACKGROUND ..._ _ _....._ Part 1 • Delineates the Wellhead Protection Area (WHPA) • Drinking Water Source Management Area (DWSMA) • Completes well and aquifer vulnerability assessment. Part 2 • Inventories potential contaminants • Evaluates several data elements • Prepares management portion of plan - goals, objectives, plan of action & evaluation WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN :ii SCHEDULE 2003 Original WHP Plan 2009 lstAmendmenttoWHP Plan On-going 2nd amendment to WHP Plan 614120 Part 1 Approved by MDH 7/23/20 Public Information Meeting WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN 1% Part 1 _ _ _____ . .._. Part 1 Amendment (LRE Report — April 2020) ✓ Municipal Wells ✓ Groundwater Flow Model ( 10 year time of travel) ✓ Wellhead Protection Area (WHPP) ✓ Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA) ✓ Well Vulnerability — All Wells Vulnerable except Well 19 ✓ Aquifer Vulnerability — Moderate to High Vulnerability WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREA 11:111111 2009 and 2020 WHPA ----. =-i..-- -rm-g- ------nz--- --tir----------- ID ..: . iPPi_20“5'8A20LLO‘y-i t'•' ' . ..• Jsi;n:.E v.:d i.E.Y i '•iMi'lii ' ".... - . MJfiL.E VALLEY.t. • 1,0 Z. . 12729N ....., . ,• APR E vA,LEv i- :.:'• ‘.i,;:i lit17it....N '-' A• ppLc vALL,Ey r4 _ SC9)566 5 AFF.F VA!I FT E; E'J.41_11EY 11: : F 112+263' r-. 15'56 le .1..i , ir .6.FC`,-E VALL:Y 19 .: Al,PL E "—•—•VALLE V.5 — — . , 1 120'U7 _ 0 ek.,..„4„,.., 73 ii j ‘ . APPLE VA U,EV'•:, ' • . • 433.2R4 li .177;7F •',PPL ,VAI_'_E,. ' APPLE'ALLEY 20 .-L-, 1z • .'7750•45 AFFI F VA!I FY 1:) 443:2t•F i P;fLE ALL 1 ',' EY,E . •a?oLEVALL EY'7' —L' 0 .., i -1; '..9 1 li ® Active City Well Included in Model ' 1 er ® Emergency Backup City Well A \ - 2020 Amended WHPA . .... — 2009 Amended WHPA i , . • • . • . . , N.. . . . ,.. •, • , .4%.........„.......,, CCfilhICCTINC.WATLR 10 LIFE w.....''''''" • .P. •.. DRINKING WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT AREA1111111 DWSMA & Vulnerability Assessment Iv 1 ler -I r3 APFtE'.ALLEY4 __ ,- '205R20 _ _ - - . .417' ® City Well f APR���' LEw 1� ' F.19 . - :t, de '�� /ET\ APP.LE'4LLEY Combined Wellhead 1-2x2�F • #' • -rRLEV.SLLEY9 r.PPL=VALLEY 11 • • •I •r19�1 •ti$� '°.� APPLE VALLEY :4 Protection Area -13 " •5 5f - • _•1a S „ E';'ALLEY 1G1$1102411, 151563 — Drinking Water Supply LI: ':.:�,': Y — EVALLEY.1 tt 20. :rf 731111 _ r ' Management APPLEI� _Cx 7 APPLE VALLEY 13 - 1 t A LL r 74. APPLE VALLEY 2� AP••1 E ti'°•LLE�`12 Ell r�r DWSMA Vulnerability , . "ALL�r,1 ' - LLEria �`J ' High - .,20°0?305 Moderate iX y ' n li J I L ' ill 1-11 - ' i __ .., 44 tvddouvcw,trioi buss WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN libib Next Steps J MDH Scoping Meeting for Part 2 — TBD — set by MDH U Complete Part 2 in 2020/2021 U Send draft Part 2 to local units of government for 60 day review U Public hearing O Submit Part 2 to MDH for approval WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN 1% Part 2 WHP Plan Part 2 Update • Update inventories of potential contaminants • Update evaluation of several data elements • Update management portion of plan - goals, objectives, plan of action & evaluation QUESTIONS ? I THANK YOU ! Nancy Zeigler, PE (AE2S) 4% FIE Nancy.Zeigler@ae2s.com 763-463-5036 • ITEM: 5.B. ..... :�. Apple COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 23, 2020 Valley SECTION: Regular Agenda Description: Adopt Resolution Approving 2040 Comprehensive Plan Staff Contact: Department/ Division: Thomas Lovelace, City Planner Community Development Department Applicant: Project Number: City of Apple Valley PC17-06-P Applicant Date: 60 Days: 120 Days: ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the resolution adopting the Apple Valley 2040 Comprehensive Plan. SUMMARY: For your consideration is a resolution adopting the Apple Valley 2040 Comprehensive Plan. All cities and counties within the seven-county Twin Cities Metropolitan Region are required to update their comprehensive plan every ten years. As required by the Minnesota Metropolitan Land Planning Act, each local jurisdiction's plan must fit within the regional goals set forth by the Metropolitan Council. The Council established their regional goals in Thrive MSP 2040, which is the vision for the region over the next 30 years, and set the policy foundations for systems and policy plans developed by the Council, which include transportation, water resources, regional parks, and housing policy plans. Upon completion of these policy plans, the Council prepared and distributed a system statement to each community and county in the region. This document addressed the implications of the metropolitan systems plans for each community in the region, which are intended to help in the preparation of the update of their comprehensive plan. Included in the statement is information specific to each community, which in our case included: • Our City's designation as "Suburban," which are communities that experienced growth and expansion in the 1980s and early 1990s, which typically have auto-oriented development patterns at lower densities. Suburban communities were expected to plan for forecasted population and household growth at average densities of at least five (5) units per acre for new development and redevelopment. They were also expected to identify opportunities for more intensive development near regional transit investments. • The Council determined that the City's forecasted population, households, and employment through 2040, to be: 2010 (act.) 2014 (est.)2020 2030 2040 Population 49,084 50,330 55,500 59,200 63,600 Households 18,875 19,341 21,700 23,300 24,900 Employment 14,279 15,479 15,800 16,400 17,100 • Guidance on appropriate densities to ensure that regional services and infrastructure can be provided in an efficient manner. • The City's affordable need allocation, which is 468 new units that are affordable to households earning up to 80% of area median income (AMI). Of these units, 221 should be affordable to households earning at or below 30% of AMI, 118 affordable to households earning 31% to 50% of AMI, and 129 units affordable to households earning 51% to 80% of AMI. Each plan is also required to contain a land use, transportation, water resources (water supply, water quality, and wastewater), parks and trails, and housing chapter and may contain an economic chapter, which the City included in the plan. On June 6, 2018, the Planning Commission held a public hearing. The hearing was open, testimony taken and the hearing was closed. No action was taken by the Commission at that time. The City Council reviewed the draft plan at their November 15, 2018, informal meeting and adopted a resolution authorizing submittal of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan to the Met Council at their December 27, 2018, meeting. After receipt of the Plan, Met Council staff notified the City, as was done with most of the other cities, that required additional information and clarification was needed before they would consider the plan to be complete. Community Development staff worked with other City departments and our consultants to provide the additional information requested and resolve some land use and housing issues. After months of discussion and submittal of supplemental information, the Met Council determined on June 9, 2020, that the plan was determined complete and ready for final review. This included review and recommendation by the Community Development and Environment Committees before final review by the 17- member Met Council. The Community Development Committee reviewed and recommended approval of the plan at their July 6, 2020, meeting. The Environment Committee reviewed the plan at their July 14, 2020, meeting and recommended approval. The Met Council will consider approval of the plan on July 22, 2020. The Planning Commission also reviewed the final plan at its meeting on July 15, 2020 and unanimously recommended approval. Staff is presenting the Met Council's recommendation to the City Council on the July 23, 2020. City Council members are encouraged to bring their 3-ring binder with the draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update to the meeting on the 23rd. BACKGROUND: As previously noted, the City is required to update the Comprehensive Plan every ten years, which looks out 20 years. The primary focus of the 2040 Plan Update has been on updating facts and figures as the majority of the goals and policies set forth in the 2030 Plan remain relevant. The SRF Consulting Group was retained to be the lead consultant and has been responsible for the preparation of the required Land Use, Housing, and Transportation chapters; as well as Vision, and Community Context chapters. Separate consultants were retained to prepare the Water Resources and Parks and Active Living chapters. The Planning Commission, acting as the steering committee for the project, met with the consultants on several occasions in 2017-18 to review and provide input on the plan's chapters. Also, during the past year the Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee discussed the Parks and Active Living chapter of the plan at their meetings; formal presentations of the chapter were given to the Committee by staff and Confluence, the consultant was retained by the City to draft the chapter. In addition, the consultant attended the 2017 Home and Garden Expo, conducted an online survey, and met with several stakeholders such as DARTS, School District 196, Dakota County Community Development Agency, Apple Valley Chamber of Commerce, the Dakota County Transportation Division, and the Sustainability Alliance. City staff also attended the 2017 Home and Garden Expo and had Comp Plan information available for review by the attendees. And finally, two open houses were held on April 30th and May 7th at the City Council chambers where the public had an opportunity to review and discuss with staff the proposed update. On May 24, 2018, Staff presented a draft Economic Development chapter to the City's Economic Development Authority and the City Council authorized the distribution of the draft plan to adjacent cities, Dakota County, school districts and state agencies for their review. Any appropriate comments submitted by the jurisdictions have been incorporated in the plan. A public hearing on the plan was held by the Planning Commission on June 6, 2018, and the City Council authorized submittal of the plan to the Met Council on December 27, 2018. BUDGET IMPACT: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Resolution Background Material Background Material Background Material Background Material Background Material Background Material Background Material Background Material Background Material Presentation CITY OF APPLE VALLEY RESOLUTION NO. 2020- ADOPTION OF THE 2040 APPLE VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN UPDATE WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes section 473.864 requires each local governmental unit to review and, if necessary, amend its entire comprehensive plan and its fiscal devices and official controls at least once every ten years to ensure its comprehensive plan conforms to metropolitan system plans and ensure its fiscal devices and official controls do not conflict with the comprehensive plan or permit activities that conflict with metropolitan system plans; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes sections 473.858 and 473.864 require local governmental units to complete their"decennial"reviews by December 31, 2018; and WHEREAS, the City Council authorized the review and update of its Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the City Council, Planning Commission, and the City Staff have prepared a proposed Comprehensive Plan intended to meet the requirements of the Metropolitan Land Planning Act and Metropolitan Council guidelines and procedures; and WHEREAS, the proposed Apple Valley 2040 Comprehensive Plan is a planning tool intended to guide the future growth and development of Apple Valley in a manner that conforms with metropolitan system plans and complies with the Metropolitan Land Planning Act and other applicable planning statutes; and WHEREAS, the proposed Apple Valley 2040 Comprehensive Plan reflect a community planning process conducted in the years 2016 through 2018 involving elected officials, appointed officials , city staff, community organizations, the public at large, developers, and other stakeholders; and WHEREAS,pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 473.858, the proposed 2040 Comprehensive Plan was submitted to adjacent governmental units and affected special districts and school districts for review and comment on May 31, 2018, and the statutory six-month review and comment period has elapsed; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on June 6, 2018, relative to the adoption of the proposed Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the City Council approved Resolution No. 2018-219, authorizing the submittal of the proposed 2040 Comprehensive Plan to the Metropolitan Council for review on December 27, 2018; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the proposed 2040 Comprehensive Plan and recommended approval on July 15, 2020; and WHEREAS, at its regular meeting on July 22, 2020, the Metropolitan Council completed its review of the proposed 2040 Comprehensive Plan and found that the Plan meets the requirements of the Metropolitan Land Planning Act, conforms to the metropolitan system plans for transportation(including aviation), water resources, and parks; is consistent with Thrive MSP 2040; and is compatible with the plans of adjacent jurisdictions and affected special districts and school districts; and WHEREAS, the proposed 2040 Comprehensive Plan includes all revisions made during the review process and responds to additional advisory comments that are part of the Metropolitan Council's actions authorizing the City of Apple Valley to place its proposed 2040 Comprehensive Plan into effect; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council approves the 2040 Apple Valley Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Apple Valley, Dakota County, Minnesota,that the 2040 Apple Valley Comprehensive Guide Plan, including the 2040 Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan is hereby adopted. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that,pursuant to sections 473.864 and 473.865 of the Metropolitan Land Planning Act, the Apple Valley City Council will: (1)review its fiscal devices and official controls; (2) if necessary, amend its fiscal devices and official controls to ensure they do not conflict with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan or permit activity in conflict with metropolitan system plans; and(3) submit amendments to fiscal devices or official controls to the Metropolitan Council for"information purposes." ADOPTED this 23rd day of July, 2020. Mary Hamann-Roland,Mayor ATTEST: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk 2 1. Introduction The Comprehensive Plan is a tool for guiding the growth, continued development and improvement of Apple Valley. The traditional view of the Comprehensive Plan focuses on land use. The Land Use Plan describes the use of property �£ within Apple Valley. It reinforces desirable land use patterns, identifies places where change is needed and sets the form . and location of land for future growth. The vision for Apple r 16; ' Valley is more, however, than a rational pattern of develop- ot ment. The Comprehensive Plan has far broader implications for shaping the character of the community and the quality of life _R n in Apple Valley. • The Plan seeks to create and sustain the elements that define the character, heritage,and identity of Apple Valley • The Plan influences the economic health of the commu- f " nity.The Plan seeks to attract new investment and guide /qp -" it to proper locations in the community. • The Plan protects the investment in existing properties by promoting strong residential neighborhoods and busi- ness districts. • The Plan shapes the future of municipal government. Public improvements are needed to facilitate and sustain development. The form of development influences the character of the local population and the demand for pub- _ lic services. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Introduction 1-1 p`PPValley Surface Water Management Plan. tended to defeat the emphasis on flexibility. The The Comprehensive Plan consists of a series of 1979 Plan was quite specific in defining the types interrelated chapters. These chapters workcollec- 10. Implementation -tools and strategies that Ap- tively to create a plan for the future. These chap- of Valley will use to implement the plans and of business planned for each parcel. The specificity ters include: achieve the vision contained in the Compre- of the approach took on a regulatory approach ra- hensive Plan. ther than a planning approach. 1. Introduction - framework and guide for use of The next major update of the Comprehensive Plan the Comprehensive Plan. Apple Valley's 2040 Comprehensive Plan was prepared in accordance with the Metropolitan occurred twenty years later. The 2020 Compre- 2. Vision for Apple Valley - description of the Land Planning Act (Minnesota Statutes, sections hensive Plan update was adopted in January "keys" to the future for Apple Valley that serve 473.851 through 473.871) and the policies of the 2000. The 2020 Plan served as the development as the framework for the creation and use of Metropolitan Council. The Comprehensive Plan guide for Apple Valley since up until 2009, when this Plan. conforms to the Metropolitan Council's "system the current 2030 Comprehensive Plan was adopt- 3. Community Context - physical, economic and statement" for Apple Valley dated September 17, ed. social factors that influenced the process of 2015. 2040 Update updating the Comprehensive Plan. Previous Planning The 2040 update of Apple Valley's Comprehensive 4. Land Use - goals, policies and plans to guide The 2040 Comprehensive Plan update is part of Plan is driven by the statutory requirements of the the use of land in Apple Valley. p p an ongoing process of community planning in Ap Metropolitan Land Planning Act. The Act requires 5. Housing and Neighborhoods - public plans • the City to update the Comprehensive Plan to ple Valley. Land use management predates the in- and programs to meet the housing needs of bring it into conformance with regional plans with- corporation of Apple Valley in 1974. The Lebanon Apple Valley residents. in three years of receiving its system statement. Town Board adopted the first zoning ordinance in 6. Economic Development - public objectives 1954 and formed the initial Planning Commission In March 2017, the City retained the SRF Consult- and strategies to sustain a healthy local econ- in 1962. The first comprehensive plan was pre- ing Group to assist with the comprehensive plan omy, including expansion of the tax base and pared in 1972 and used a "new town" concept of update.The kick-off to the planning process began the creation of jobs. seven residential neighborhoods supported by vil- in April 2017 at the City's Home and Garden Expo. 7. Parks and Recreation-plans and programs to lage centers and the downtown area. The draft of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan was maintain and enhance Apple Valley's system The 1979 Plan responded to the requirements of distributed to adjacent cities, Dakota County, Inde- of parks,trails, recreational facilities, and open the 1976 Metropolitan Land Planning Act. The pendent School Districts 191 and 196; and state space. 1979 land use plan was originally established as a agencies, including the Metropolitan Council, for 8. Transportation - summary of Transportation flexible guide oriented towards a pattern of devel- their six-month review on May 30, 2018. A public Plan for Apple Valley. opment that emphasized the downtown area. How- hearing was conducted by the Planning Commis- 9. Water Resources - summary of Apple Valley's ever, through the amendment process, numerous sion on June 6, 2018. plans for Sanitary Sewer, Water Supply, and land use designations were created (especially in the business and institutional categories) that CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Introduction 1-2 APR Valley The process of preparing the 2040 Comprehensive Planning Commission Planning Consultants Plan update included the following elements: • Thomas O. Melander(Chair) • SRF Consulting Group, Inc. • The Planning Commission served as the • Ken Alwin • AE2S, Inc. steering committee for the process of updating •the Comprehensive Plan. The Planning Com- Tim Burke Confluence mission held workshops to review work of the • Keith Diekmann • Barr Engineering, Co. consultants and to guide the preparation of the • Jodi Kurtz Plan. • Paul Scanlan • The City Council conducted a joint City Coun- • cil and Planning Commission informal work David Schindler session as well as additional informal work City Staff sessions to review and comment on key points in the update process. • Thomas Lawell, City Administrator • Two community open house meetings were • Bruce Nordquist, Community Development held to inform the public about the comprehen- Director sive plan update and to receive feedback at • Matt Saam, Public Works Director key points in the process. • Barry Bernstein, Parks and Recreation Direc- • A separate Comprehensive Plan Update page tor was established as part of the City's website . Thomas Lovelace, City Planner to communicate news and information about the planning process. • Kathy Bodmer, Planner • Alex Sharpe, Planner/Economic Development 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Specialist City Council • Brandon Anderson, City Engineer • Mary Hamann-Roland (Mayor) • Carol Blommel-Johnson, Utilities Superinten- dent • John Bergman • Susan Muelken, Recreation Manager • Tom Goodwin • Jessica Schaum, Natural Resources Coordi- • Ruth Grendahl nator • Clint Hooppaw CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Introduction 1-3 APPValley 2. Vision for Apple Valley This Vision Statement identifies leading priorities !{ and principals, desired for the City of Apple Valley through 2040. The Comprehensive Plan is the { blueprint to achieve this vision. The Vision State- _ ment describes the Apple Valley of today and the -- 1 community's aspirations for tomorrow. In times of change or conflict, the Vision Statement serves as E -- ar ' a compass, a centering point. � � � �u_' Not all aspects of this vision statement pertain di- . - r, , ilk wee a p ,�' ili; rectly to the Comprehensive Plan. Therefore, the T— - City government cannot be the sole stewards re- 1 of i t •{ • sponsible for achieving this vision. As a shared ', • '! " y- #tn ;. ,� vision for Apple Valley, all residents and business- 'i %, es can take pride in their community and the con- tributions they make. ill ' The vision for the future of Apple Valley is described as a series of keys. These guiding principles work together to sustain and enhance valued aspects of :. the community. Applying these keys will open op- �-' portunities for future prosperity. The numbers as- sE ,,. • sociated with each key serve as a means of identi- .. fication and emphasis and not as a ranking of pri- ority or importance. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY I 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Vision for Apple Valley 2-1 Apple 111 A Key 3 - Business Oriented F Apple Valley is a magnet for businesses. We provide an s ? f excellent location,strong regional transportation connec- j a .. tions, a skilled workforce,and a strong marketplace. We„ work with the Chamber of Commerce and other business Key 1-Service organizations to actively attract and retain businesses to City government provides the services,infrastructure,and achieve the vision of Apple Valley, while remaining corn land use controls that touch every aspect of this vision. mitted to our traditional high standards of quality. We While City government is not solely responsible for the Key 2 - A Great Place to Live seek an expanding array of jobs,goods,services,and en vision, the vision cannot be realized without its leader- Apple Valley is a great place to live. We build neighbor- tertainment that meet the needs of our residents. We ship and stewardship. Quality leadership and excellent hoods of enduring quality and character.They are active, encourage businesses and their employees to play an ac staff should be continued hallmarks of Apple Valley. City healthy, and safe places. Tree-lined, well-maintained tive role in community life. We play an active role in the government should be responsive to community needs, streets increase the beauty and comfort of our neighbor- region to ensure that current and future transportation holding firmly to community standards while retaining hoods. The places we live are well-connected to parks, systems, housing stock, and amenities continue to pro flex- the flexibilityto seize opportunities that arise. The Cityschools, shopping, and employment a su vide Apple Valley residents with access, choice, and pp pp g, by supportive, is a partner with business and industry. City government multimodal transportation system. Apple Valley offers ibility to pursue rewarding work. sets high standards for its financial stewardship, making choices in housing that allow people in all stages of their Economic development strategies are geared toward en- investments that pay dividends in terms of the quality of life to make a home in our community.Apple Valley is an hancing and sustaining live-work balance and attracting life described in the Vision Statement.The quality of City affordable place to live. We encourage residents to be and retaining employers that pay living wages.Apple Val- government ultimately lies in the hands of our residents. connected with one another and engaged in community ley has available land for development and redevelop- We must care enough to become informed and involved. life with a commitment to volunteerism. We promote ment, a talented workforce, and the techno-logical infra- Governance in Apple Valley encourages and facilitates pride in property that produces individual and collective structure to accomplish these goals. When more people public involvement. action to enhance the quality, integrity, and value of our live and work in Apple Valley, it reduces travel costs and neighborhoods. We are committed to protecting the air pollution,and mitigates highway congestion, resulting unique qualities which make Apple Valley a great place to in savings to families and government. It gives people live for current residents and future generations. more time to spend with family and in the community. The City of Apple Valley emphasizes the importance of providing jobs that pay incomes capable of sustaining those families and their community. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Vision for Apple Valley 2-2 AppValley LF V gC • APO. Jpt1 R»y . ,; 14739 L'aESQ —- RIDGE PARK % m ifid .:err- ry . . I I .., I L lii 1 mimillhillii -19 I r — • �, Key 4 - Safe Key 5 - Parks to Experience Key 6 - Healthy and Active Apple Valley maintains a strong commitment to safety in Parks are an integral part of the fabric of our community. Apple Valley's policies are designed to make it the model all places,at every hour of the day.Through excellent po- Every home has walkable access to a city park.Parks pro- of a healthy, active, and safe community. A comprehen- lice,fire,and medical response services,our citizens feel vide places for us to play and to gather with our neighbors. sive system of sidewalks, trails, and bike lanes connects safe knowing that help is only minutes away. We are Parks help to preserve the natural environment of Apple neighborhoods, jobs, schools, and other destinations as committed to maintaining high service standards by add- Valley.Apple Valley's parks are not seen as individual enti- an integral part of our transportation system.We offer a ing resources as the community grows and changes.The ties,but as part of a broader,inter-connected system that wide range of formal and informal recreation facilities commitment to safety requires involvement on the part provides a suite of attractions and amenities. High-lights that support a multitude of active and passive recreation of our residents.Apple Valley is a place where we care for of this system include the Minnesota Zoo,Dakota County activities. Food, health care, and other essential goods our neighbors. Lebanon Hills Regional Park, and our many local neigh- and services are readily accessible to all Apple Valley res- borhood parks. The City provides and maintains a wide idents. We plan our community in ways that sustain the range of parks and recreational facilities with the ability clean water and air on which we depend. Through best to adapt to the changing needs of the population.We are practices of storm water management, pollution mitiga- committed to providing the resources to maintain and tion,and natural resources protection,we will continue to improve Apple Valley parks.The City works collaborative- protect and sustain a healthy living environment ly with Independent School District 196, Independent School District 191, Dakota County, local athletic associ- ations and other groups to meet shared park and recre- ation needs. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY I 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Vision for Apple Valley 2-3 APpValley ' Y"tly �` _ f 's 'c ; � ^x . + w 1• *Ra hik 1 I _ a& � - r 82. t t I M - ® ; � . , b. pi - -- ;'•' 01)61estORe � . .............. ` -. .. , .._�� .= ,__ t .x,.. '-,. 4---1`of �� ily it — _,.._._....,..Key 9 — Successful Downtown Key 7 — Sustainable ® Key 8 — Accessible Apple Valley has a unique,identifiable,and thriving down- Apple Valley is recognized as a MN Green City.We recog- The ability to move safely and efficiently within Apple Val- town.Downtown Apple Valley will not be a singular place, nize that our community's natural amenities need to be ley and the region is essential.At a basic level,Apple Val- but a collection of strongly connected and experiential properly respected and managed.We must wisely use our ley's transportation system must connect all residents to destinations that serve and enhance the community.The natural, economic, and human resources to sustain the the services they need and desire.Apple Valley supports core of the downtown area is the four quadrants of the quality of life we enjoy.We seek to maintain water quality a multifaceted transportation system that can accom- Cedar Avenue/County Road 42 intersection.The scope of and conserve our freshwater,air quality,energy, and oth- modate automobiles, mass transit, bicycles and pedes- downtown Apple Valley continues to evolve in form, use, er resources and capital for future generations. This re- trians. Apple Valley should be a place of "great streets." and density. quires a continued commitment to improving the effi- A great street extends beyond the street surface to the ciency of community facilities and infrastructure, from sidewalks and landscaping in the adjacent right-of-way.A The downtown area is and will continue to be a place of design concept to construction, operation, and repurpos- great street provides for the safe and efficient movement commerce. It is the primary location of the goods and ing. Likewise, Apple Valley is committed to maintaining of vehicles while encouraging travel by bicycle and by foot. services needed by Apple Valley residents and regional productive partnerships with the energy industry,regional A great street supports and enhances adjacent land use communities. Downtown must also continue to be the nonprofits, and local businesses and institutions to ex- and adds to the quality of life and identity of Apple Valley. civic core of the community. We envision a downtown pand access to renewable energy and minimize the City's area that includes a growing mixture of places to shop, carbon footprint. Throughout this plan, existing efforts work, live, and play, and which encourages engagement and recommended initiatives related to sustainability or with the built environment at a human scale.While busi nesses require safe and convenient access by car, the resilience are indicated by:0). downtown should be designed to allow people to reach it and move within it on foot or bicycle. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY I 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Vision for Apple Valley 2-4 APpValley tiOk a �" , ^a,� Alf ,tea, ' .I, - E . sf �t �3 r s ITIL - " - t -- .2 5 f y * ..vii ,fit` At,A ". I� ram `T�� ®l - ,' a $ ,�fI � ` 41 -,.. -.1_. P74. Key 10 - Exceptional Learning Key 11 - Technology and Innovation Key 12 - A Community for a Lifetime The quality of life in Apple Valley is inextricably linked to Innovative technologies will emerge and expand through- In 2019,Apple Valley turned 50. It is a growing city that the quality of educational opportunities. Educating our out the world. These technologies will have a profound all residents proudly call home. We are committed to children remains our highest priority.Schools are not only impact on all aspects of life.Although the specific nature strengthening our community through continued invest- places to learn, but they are focal points of community of these technologies cannot be known, nor the level of ment in its people and neighborhoods. Apple Valley's life. Learning does not begin with kindergarten nor end acceptance, the arrow of innovation points toward in- housing, schools, parks, businesses, and cultural institu- with high school. It is a lifelong activity.We seek a future creased automation in many sectors of the economy and tions provide outstanding opportunities to live, work, with increasing opportunities for continuing education in the urban systems which support them. In transporta- play, and engage with fellow citizens, regardless of age located in Apple Valley. We work in strong partnership tion, examples include the continued development and or ability. We will proactively respond to the needs of with Independent School District 196, Independent deployment of automated and connected vehicles and changing demographics, including the growing elderly School District 191, St. Mary's University and MacPhail intelligent transportation systems infrastructure. Ad- community,young adults and their families,and minority School of Music, and other educational institutions to vances are made possible by the expanding, sharing citizens, by supporting a suitable mixture of housing and achieve this vision. economy, which includes how we live and move about. services.The City government will maintain strong work- Global climate change compels alternative energy pro- ing partnerships with developers, nonprofits, regional duction, energy consumption and decarbonization, and government agencies,and other stakeholders who reflect investment in green technologies and resilient design. these values in their own designs and policy initiatives. Apple Valley will position itself to be a leader in prepared- Apple Valley is a place where you can plant:grow: pros- ness for these changes, and to capitalize on technologi- per. cal changes through wise saving, investment, and a flex- ible approach to governance. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Vision for Apple Valley 2-5 APpValley 3. Community Context iR,r IP R , »W ♦ -"^ r,` '� i * c AJ- c a . �y r}4, gr� • � 5 1'l JL.t Y '1'�•, V $ , b ' e. ,.S /, .',} x #,. S kM• . Introduction - ti_ 4,.� `� r-• N •• n %Li Y - •,, Planning for the future does not start on a clean ` -- ``..' f ' 411r F' f slate. The future will be built on the foundation of c -la - `' ; � `.- x .r�r �. : gym- k.� Apple Valley, as it exists today. The community �. ''Na' .�a, S ;, . �' has evolved over time, shaped by a variety of geo .x 'ti p t i 4, ' ; '•s Zc. ti c. ,0• '. ' '�. sri '� ' '. �.* �, � graphic, economic, and sociodemographic factors, ` ` • as well as historical tannin decisions. A clear zi Y , p •a ,�• .i A 0 # ' •" ':. understanding of these influences provides the +tom * `s , r„' � .,✓ ;"' f.,.' y r .: -�.• {I 1mi �;' g �- �'; context for planning decisions now and in the fu ,•, ,*, .. - ,. ture. �`" . ` 7...',. It is impossible to plan without a careful examina- r � ' "'i` * -�.; ',}'L t - �' �•� tion of the physical, demographic, social and eco .44 , ' la 1 rOa. nomic characteristics of the community. What characteristics existtodayand how aretheyikel .. r l y ' • °• � „" • - to change over the course of this plan? Do these ,,,, . characteristics point to potential public actions - through the Comprehensive Plan? The Communi- �:_� _ ty Context provides information needed to answer - — _ �s � ,__. ,. these questions. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Community Context 3-1 AppValley Location Apple Valley's suburban context is key to devel- Apple Valley. oping the land use plan, transportation plan, and Apple Valley is located in Dakota County in the other elements of the Comprehensive Plan. Density Expectations southern portion of the seven-county Twin Cities in the corn- Metropolitan Area. The community is located ap- prehensive plan reflects the reality of regional proximately 20 miles from downtown Saint Paul The 2040 Comprehensive Plan update is part of transportation opportunities and constraints. As and 20 miles from downtown Minneapolis, and 13 an ongoing process of community planning in noted in the Metropolitan Council's 2040 Trans- miles from the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Apple Valley. Land use management predates the portation Policy Plan, it is not possible to continue Airport. This location is ideal for residents who incorporation of Apple Valley in 1969,Apple Valley to expand highway capacity in a sustainable way, want to enjoy the amenities of the Twin Cities but became a statutory city in 1974. The Lebanon given the Twin Cities' expanding footprint and prefer a more suburban lifestyle. Township Board adopted the first zoning ordinance funding limitations. Therefore, the regional trans- Two major regional highways, I-35E and Cedar in 1954 and formed the initial Planning Commis- portation plan is shifting toward a strategy of Avenue/Minnesota Trunk Highway 77 (MNTH sion in 1962. The first comprehensive plan was travel demand management (TDM) versus high- 77), connect Apple Valley with employment cen- prepared in 1972 and used a "new town" concept way capacity improvements. Part of TDM in- ters and amenities throughout the metro region. of seven residential neighborhoods supported by volves the application of transit-oriented growth These highways also provide local businesses village centers and the downtown area. strategies. The Metropolitan Council has set re- with excellent access to customers, employees, quirements for overall density within transit corri- and shipping. Figure 3.1 shows the location of the The 1979 Land Use Plan responded to the re- dors, as well as for residential density that should City relative to the regional system of highways, quirements of the 1976 Metropolitan Land Plan- be considered in order to achieve the overall regional parks, and outdoor recreation areas. ning Act. The Comprehensive Plan was updated density requirements. The overall density expec- in 2000 (2020 Plan) and again in 2009 (2030 tation is 10 units per acre within a half-mile radius Regional Planning Designation Plan). The 2030 Plan has served as the devel- of the Red Line Bus Rapid Transit stations. As a opment guide for Apple Valley since it was guideline, the average density for new develop- adoptedApple Valley is designated as a suburban corn- in 2009. munity in the Twin Cities' regional plan, Thrive ment should be 20 units per acre or higher within MSP 2040. Apple Valley experienced develop- Over the past fifty years, Apple Valley has trans- the one-half mile transit shed. ment in the 1980's — 1990's similar to other sub- formed from a rural township to a city of more than urbs in the region. Following this growth, Apple 50,000 people.The remainder of this Historic Con- Valley is approaching buildout, but many oppor- text section examines key trends, past plans, and tunities remain for development. Similarly, the fu- recent development that frame the challenges that ture road-way network is largely in place. Future must be considered in planning for the next twenty transportation investments will primarily focus on years. Other sections of the Community Context continued maintenance and adaptive improve- chapter provide more detailed information about ments to manage travel demand. Understanding the demographic and physical characteristics of CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Community Context 3-2 Apple Figure 3.1-Apple Valley Location + �� i • it aver J � [Hopkins 'St.pi ls- i'��11��1�w���■i i►!ri�11§1T ii 1�1l, -r � • milli Minna 1: ir�r:' L"lydale som \ iy� ...Li P .■ StrRau1 1`;_.'- WestiS(. Maplewood." Sher. LegendIIP �lI.1 4U I� Iv' AI Paul '�, 1 ti�.r■ • w, . �.:. "�': ,-Mendota Heights ai• so • Wood.ury ( �_ _� Cities and Townships Edina; 6� .:y si ■� �a�`ttttt�� 1 }Snelling i Mendota .'���i� Sin" \ P, Regional Highways l �. (unorg.)`: ) 'Mendota Newport" Ri hfield � :-ni • i Regional Parks i 1-0 Heights gu",r"sh Lake L ': —� moimi _ Lakes and Rivers i,; err /1 u I •1 r 'q� ~1 Airport �MrM' E......M__mod __Ek1. PN� * f �° }r�■raI Chan j a anal Grey'Cfoud,.. aw 8loomingtan lr _..� 9 Sver ,. Ar. "F+ 7�, ��❑Ye Island Twp- , . e� 1 .F- 13 Heights 1 " •r; `5.. .F 3t-- r' 35E .L r:. I re(3ro ve , ■�■� �L,-� Aiira._ iIlsland�T,wp�' Shakopee 1:ISui1ruh1 .4EWI �� `�.n "7 Jc ,M —Apple Valley +Rosemount _ t�ininger Twp, ([_owsviile F 3 M I t Twp. _• oh i A •IuII Hastings I —Prior•Lake " �� Spring.. A l „„ ,'�"�ke Tw :. . �--�_1__ �. ._ r+�._ �:Coates .. . Ninlnyerr 12 11PIPAI Mir Twp I -t �5. . Spring rA 11 ' J `v--- Lake Tr/p. . 1�� - ------ i Credit �-- r -- � River Lakeville Empire Twp. erg million 1 o 1 2 3 Up: Farmington P'"• Miles Sand 1 ll,rmllllon C''e k �� 41 I FarmingtAn Twp. NSirsl7a"7 " j. Twp it ' � ■ Empire Twp. 1 �•MKw,p.y�(.,ni.,,.Iry NORTH -r i ,_._...� Cedar ri New Market-! -- _-- _— Castle Castle i [lougias Nei a 1T ke Tw T �' I I ( p• I Eureka Twp. R `k Twp. Ili Rock Twp. I \ Hampton Twp, T.wP CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Community Context 3-3 AppValley Current Trends Figure 3.2-Population and Households in Apple Valley 0 Population Growth 70,000 0Lio o „i o N l0 Apple Valley has grown steadily over the past fifty 60,000 o .r VD ul years, At the 2010 Census, Apple Valley's popula- N. o 0 N Lr, tion was 49,084, an increase of 3,557 from 2000. 50,000 Lri By 2020, the population is forecasted to grow to oo ol 55,500, an increase of 6,416 residents. The Met- 40,000 m ropolitan Council forecasts steady growth from li 0 2020 to 2040, the planning horizon for this update 30,000 � li �, o g"V N of the Comprehensive Plan. The population is N N 20,000 a forecasted to grow to 63,600 by 2040, with growth 0 0 L averaging around 400 residents per year over the 10,000 M a LID next two decades. Figure 3.2 shows historical and 0 forecasted growth. o 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2015 2020* 2030* 2040* Apple Valley is forecasted to add 14,000 resi- Source:Decennial Census,2015 ACS,Metropolitan Council Forecasts dents by 2040. Figure 3.3-Annual Housing Units Permitted by Apple Valley Population growth and housing development go 700 hand-in-hand. Figure 3.3 shows annual new 600 housing starts, based on building permit data from the State of the Cities Data Systems (SOCDS)for 500 I . the period 2006 to 2015. This chart makes sever- 400 al important points about residential development trends in Apple Valley: 300 • 1,214 new housing units were built from 2006 200 I to 2015. A revised pace of development oc- 100 — I curred at the time of a national economic re- — cession. (The 2030 Plan reported 7,994 new 0 units from 1998 to 2007.) The effect of the 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 national housing bubble and subsequent re- •Single-Family Detached Multifamily(3 units or more) Townhomes(single-family attached) •Duplex cession is evident beginning in the late 2000s. Source:Metropolitan Council CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Community Context 3-4 Apple Val ley ey • 43% of the units were single family, 4% were Figure 3.4-Total Permit Value for Commercial, industrial,and institutional(New Construction) multi-family structures with three to four units, and 53% were multi-family structures with $40,000,000 five or more units. $35,000,000 • Traditional single-family detached homes rep- resent 22% of total development since 2000. S3o,000,000 However, annual demand for new single- $25,000,000 — family homes was steady from 2000-2015. $20,000,000 • Similarly, single-family attached homes(town- $15,000,000 homes) represent 23% of total development since 2000. Townhome and condominium S1o,000,00o development occurred in the early 2000's, $5,000,000 I and shows signs of increasing to 2040. This $0 Y ... coincides with changes in state statutes that 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 reduce development liability. Commercial Industrial Public and Institutional The City has a good mix of housing styles with a Jource:-Metropolitan Council core of single-family detached neighborhoods trends comes from the value of new construction ranging from a low of no development in 2011 and newer townhomes and apartments. reported by building permits. Figure 3.4 shows to$34.7 million in 2006. the reported value of all building permits for • Commercial development, which includes commercial, industrial, and institutional from 2003 businesses that provide goods and/or ser- While these trends do not determine future hous- to 2015. Note that this chart does not express the vices, constituted 47% of the total investment ing development, they lead to important ques- number of establishments or the number/quality in non-residential development since 2003. tions.What pace of new housing development can of jobs associated with investment. Commercial development occurred in every be expected in the short-term and the long-term? year but 2011. How can Apple Valley best encourage an appro- New construction of commercial, industrial, and • Public and Institutional development consti- priate mix of new housing options? How does institutional dipped during the recession, although tuted 34% of total investment in non- housing influence the characteristics of the future redevelopment did continue to occur. Following residential development. Public uses, such population? the recession, there has been steady develop- as schools, parks, and public service facili- ment of new commercial, industrial, and institu- ties, are financed with public dollars. There Commercial, Industrial, and tional facilities. has been sustained investment in public and Institutional Development instructional facilities. • The permitted value for new commercial, Industrial development constituted 11% of the Another means of describing recent development industrial, and institutional development av- total investment from 2003 to 2015. Industrial eraged $16.7 million from 2003 to 2015, development did not occur as regularly as corn- CITY OF APPLE VALLEY I 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Community Context 3-5 Apple mercial or institutional development. Never- eral, the building value share of total property Figure 3.6 maps total taxable value per square theless, industrial development is a vital com- value is lowest in the following situations: foot of parcel area, for taxes payable in 2015, in ponent of the local economy, and led over the downtown focus area. • vacant lots commercial in 2014 and 2015, following the recession. • lots with large amounts of surface parking From a parcel utilization standpoint, commercial • parks and open space properties that are developed at higher intensi- Tax Base ties/densities perform better than properties that • lakes, wetlands, and stormwater ponds New private development creates tax base. In are developed at lesser intensities/densities. One Some underdeveloped areas, such as parks and critical variable that influences tax efficiency (tax- 2015, according to the Dakota County Assessor, wetlands, provide a valuable public function. City property tax receipts totaled more than $68 able value per square foot) is total property value/ Others, such as two manufactured home parks square foot. Clearly, higher-value properties pro- million. Approximately $50 million was from resi- areas located east and west of Minnesota Trunk dential (single-family and apartments), $17 million vide more total tax revenue. However, the most ( 9 YHighway 77 (MN 77), provide affordable housing was from commercial, and just over$1 million was efficient developments are those that have a high alternatives for inclusive housing options within from industrial. the City. Areas which are underutilized, and do property value per square foot, and therefore a not provide other public purposes may be candi- higher taxable value per square foot. Property Value Trends dates for redevelopment. Parcel size is also a critical determinant. Once Sustaining and growing property values is a key commercial parcels approach four to five acres outcome of urban planning. Understandinglocal Taxable Value per Square Foot (approximately 200,000 square feet), it is nearly property value trends helps jurisdictions make in- Another way to visualize development efficiency impossible to achieve a taxable return greater formed decisions. For example, areas with low or is to divide total taxable value (building value plus than $1 per square foot. This is because a large declining property values may be opportunities for lot value) by parcel area. Like the previous met- percentage of "big-box" development is devoted redevelopment—or they may indicate locations of ric,total taxable value/parcel area is contingent on to parking and internal vehicle circulation. Also, functioning affordable housing that should be pro- the use of the parcel, the total property value, and large commercial buildings tend to be single-story tected. the intensity of development. For example, the and permit only one use of the parcel. downtown focus area shows a noticeably higher Building Value as a Share of Total Property taxable value per square foot than the surrounding Value residential area—this is largely due to the concen- Figure 3.5 maps building value as a share of total tration of retail and related commercial business- property value for the entire City, using the esti- es in the area. However, some areas within the downtown focus area perform better than others mated values for taxes payable in 2015. This ratio from a tax-efficiency perspective. Valuations are is intended to identify underutilized parcels that might be opportunities for redevelopment. (White determined by the Dakota County Assessor using county wide trends in property type. areas on the map indicate parcels with ownership by association maintained development.) In gen- CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Community Context 3-6 Apple. Figure 3.5-Building Value as a Share of Total Property Value i `� EAGAN T B ildin• ue are sue. �� i� 1 o T. al Property Values ` `� .." �` Less than 10.0% , 10.1%to25.0% � II • � rIs 25.1 /oto50.0/o / . Ilh _,_ . - r WA l 50.1%to 75.0% ~, I 1,000. g �yi L' `V 75.1%to 90.0% _c$ ; t �re than 90.0% Insuffi- / f i � �Pr � � �/ -4'- Lo� le • ,..� WI cient Data ..-�: ;.a :�` ` ,��� � lpar*4*24 / u 1 Source:Dakota Coin GIS . -� R � _nl o i *Piih,44 I''''''::::" ,t 11 Alimagnef .`\�\`,. - � 1 :Irk pia �� � + irJ1 Lake y •j ..�„ � Se. � JLI[ lop. ,i,,,,.. �t y__ 143 4' :,......4 Ti•.4 frark,..2;91 .., 11 P1741FUE4 YJ Atl a.: IN. ��r`!i: 1e 0: _ !. , F iii_ Ike....11. kirdirlir: .ill I mir.ITE I JIM 11 II 1,:l• m 159.1grar i:• lel V_:, - Mr ' z • ii b:N::,,,t,Aft „. . )• 1111. 10 ■b � �,. 47% ir-S Alai Ita %r m., 0 0.25 0.5 ��1 1 i14i1lali 0l 1•, i1 :oo A lg Am . Miles E C9 � ` ■ 41 m 1 Ip�, :/ A .._,_ ' IL1 1 1.1 �� 15j4 � , �r r�,. �ti: ��f� � Cobblestone Lake tt; 1 _,_ Lac Lavon i r. 4. y,/- 'i _� i , - �a-,aIt�nx°,anP.'.� NORTH „1J1,1,1 ;.,., "rdiiMil ,..,, r is "11 rZaG .r .,.�_ lik LAKEVILL , CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Community Context 3-7 Apple Valle y Figure 3.6-Taxable Value per Square Foot for Dow•town Commercial Properties N._ m - Irif I, I1 ii otal Ta a ue 1111.., •er Squa - Foot SW 1111 Less than$0.25 NIA ` I \.--.....c:1\) ___ ___ $0.26-$0.50 Amp _.-- I ill . 14, $0.51 -$1. . ■ �\ 13. -_____ - $1.01 -$2.00 tar / i Mrre than $3.00 ii- Q ' ii Are. _---- 7,,,ligi Illii iii ill _. Taxes payable for owntown w commercial prc perti sin 2015. F X IM _1<cliti rce:Dakota Co my GIS w . 11111 _ 150TH OWill 111A NTO - .b.e.,, ....-177red. 0., It ..ir ' ;irkis:41,AvT4titoilik iihisi;s,7„N-rrikr, , _:: ,.._ _,-,0-_,N,A.1 1,,I.A.,,,,....I,, flte...,411r.,NP, '. i_ /46.4p ii. ,,, . '''-':.:-.1 -74iftriilqZ%14-4446_11Atal I 1 _.,,, , ;00..1%110mpg/A iii-ph_gl-N .....itio A _ r i ip,1.'V iibl'i-.A u' 'T z j?r`T .1 ). 0.3 WI �. = ,.: I I it ;�■■,•r l._.i.. 491.-ide-iiirc.F:, r- � i��r#lei\�. ,. � 1f�^Lti!] ► MI Consulting Group.Inc - NO TN 0 PI 1NI\ 1 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update ;s; Community Context 3-8 Apple 2030 Plan Development at Cobblestone Lake has continued through 2018. A senior living facility, Orchard The 2030 Comprehensive Plan was adopted in Path, has been completed at the west entrance to 2009. Figure 3.7 shows the pattern of develop- the development. This complex will provide 193 ment and types of land use envisioned at that units for senior residents in the first phase. Poten- time.The 2030 Plan provides a frame of reference tial expansion could add an additional 64 inde- �. ., .Y I. for viewing changes in the community since that pendent units and an 80 bedroom skilled nursing ®tl "�' ���� i I i ',7,tll Ili 4. - ',:' M" li plan was adopted. facility. A rental townhome development of 196 a : -. units has been applied for and plans to begin - ct'- - Recent Development construction in 2018/2019. T The previous sections show broad trends for Central Village growth and development. It is useful to look inside ` these trends. Since 2000, a variety of actions have In December 2003, the City Council approved the laid the foundation for future development. "Central Village Plan". This plan established the development principles for a 60-acre area focused I 1,,, I __- Cobblestone Lake around Galaxie Avenue and 153rd Street. The ��i r a.' i i Central Village includes approximately 450,000 �g0 r %-- ill - In 2002, Tradition Development began construc- 1 !� III` square feet of commercial/retail/office space and m _ p + .114% s - ) tion of Cobblestone Lake. This 323-acre master- a mix of medium- and high-density housing types, N71 17'14• �_ planned community lies in the southeast portion including townhouses, condominiums, apart- -" _. _- the South Central Planning Area. The Cobble- ments, and senior-only dwelling units. stone Lake development contains a variety of single-family and multi-family housing types, In 2017, the Parkside Gabella opened with 196 u- I CI. parks, and commercial uses. Nits and the Planning Commission approved a Sri mixed-use senior housing cooperative with 58 The commercial element of Cobblestone Lake units. The Parkside at Galante apartments on the , took shape in 2007. The master plan for the southeast corner of Galaxie Avenue and 152nd Igi we commercial area contained a 180,000 square foot Street W added 134 multi-family units to the Super Target and four other buildings (26,400 City's housing stock. Infill development on '_M, ,��, "� Founder's Lane continues to take shape. square feet). The Cobblestone Lake commercial -,.— = area is located on the east side of Pilot Knob The Central Village design plan was intended to :��°; _ - — promote a more dense, walkable, mixed-use en- Road at 157th Street. This commercial district vironment, which stands in contrast to the sub- Top:The Shops on Gataxie;Middle:Multi-family apartments under represents the first major commercial area not urban superblocks andpower centers located construction on Gataxie Avenue; Bottom: Senior Cooperative Galax- physically connected to the downtown area. p Housing and Mixed Use is planned for the vacant parcel on Galax- along Cedar Avenue and County Road 42. Mar- ie Avenue and 153rd Street. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Community Context 3-9 AppValley Figure 3.7-2030 Land Use Plan I `s EAGAN 20 0 Land a / ,syv - ow Density Residential Me- "E' irr LEBANON HILLS VALLEYWODD REGIONAL PARK MUNICIPAL dium Density Residential . MIMI MINNESOTA GOLF COURSE ZOOLOGICAL High Density Residential I GARDENS 17 A Commercial f Mixed Use p �� Mixed Business Campus In- K dustrial I II' ) Institutional so Fa guar Lake Park and Open Space c Long Lake iliPrivate Recreation ,------- Right of Way W Water I 'a r ce a I— t1 Uirir A Lll 140TH ST W- tea~ / Alimagnet Lake W r ° CO a W w ` W Vr W zWI re ell 0 a .IP , Mil_ f ___ L___ .. _. i_ t nil iiiii. R.pa_ • . Z J Q ■ .�1 Y�11 --� )�• a qt 1s f 1-' fir ■1 1 ° IIIW ,I,� #2 > pi)" � . l;,L 0 0.25 0.5z f Miles IW"ill - 1 Cobblestone Lake 11 LI\,. NORTH LacLavon ' II ConsLIting Lrnop;Inc. '1 160TH ST W + LAKEVILL CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Community Context 3-10 Apple Valley ey ket conditions during the recession impacted the timing of development, however renewed growth has occurred coinciding with the economy. The development evolved to match the marketplace, adding rental housing square footage and a paired one-way road circulation network. Chapter 4, Land Use, includes a series of Downtown De- sign Guidelines that build on the successful ele- 4- ments of the Central Village. . C Kelly Park Area East of Galaxie Avenue M � :_ - Development activity has included the follow- II- , .aol 1 1 �� ing multi-family apartment projects; - _ ' f� I .1 Or,r • Parkside Village Gabella, a 196-unit market f., 71171111111:114 — rate apartment building - a * y_ 1 `HI III a • Parkside Village Galante, a 134-unit market , R _____ ` rate apartment building i-. �� f_ I IIIY • Remington Cove I and II, 201 units of market 1 rate apartments in two buildings ------ __ _ — v.4 • Remington Cove II was constructed in 2016. ram' �+.101 Cedar Avenue Improvements/BRT F • . . - -- , , . After more than a decade of planning, the State of �`Y1 111111*'t':4-.'7-V - )1-..440 Minnesota's first bus rapid transit (BRT) line, the 4j a,' .1,c tea:;_-ii.l'a.: METRO Red Line, began operating in 2013. This Red Line transit station and walkway on Cedar Avenue. line provides station-to-station service between Cedar Avenue was reconstructed to include a ties for future transitway development through the Mall of the America and the Apple Valley Tran- thru lane between 138th and 160th Streets. 2040. Expansion of the Apple Valley Transit Sta- sit station located at 155th Street and Cedar Av- tion was programmed for Stage 2 (2015-2020). A enue. This station includes a parking deck, shel- In 2015,the Dakota County Cedar Avenue Transit- park-and- ride capacity expansion has been dis- ters for northbound and southbound riders, and way Implementation Plan Update (IPU) was cussed for northern Apple Valley at 127th and an overhead skyway. Additional shelters were completed. This plan identifies a series of goals, Cedar Ave to bring online transit services to the constructed at the 140th and 147th station stops. evaluation measures, investment thresholds, and surrounding neighborhood in Stage 4 (by 2040). To facilitate the shoulder-running BRT system, other progress indicators to help establish priori- Various bicycle and pedestrian improvements, CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Community Context 3-11 AppValley technological improvements, and maintenance Senior Housing Development Table 3.1 contains the estimated area in each will occur over the life of this plan. land use category. The map uses an interpreta- • As its population ages, Apple Valley has prior- tion of property tax data to determine existing One of the goals of the IPU is to "enhance and itized development of senior housing facilities. land use. The purpose of this map is not to pre- promote transit-oriented [TOD] development that Numerous ongoing developments offer varied cisely specify the use of each parcel, but to illus- is compatible with community goals and helps in- living and affordability arrangements. These trate the overall pattern of development. crease ridership." Apple Valley can leverage re- developments include: Legends, a housing Table 3.1-Existing Land Use,2016 gional transit investments by encouraging a facility with 163 affordable units, located on LAND USE ACRES PERCENT dense mixture of residential and employment- the southwest corner of Cedar Avenue and Agricultural 11 <1.0% based re-development in the Cedar Avenue 140th Street W. Rural Residential 42 <1.0% Transitway. Regional planning authorities also • Orchard Path, with 193 continuum of care Low Density Residential 4,528 40.5% recognize that TOD implementation should occur market-rate units, located at the west entrance Medium Density Residential 512 4.6% on a scale that is compatible with the communi to the Cobblestone Lake Development.p High Density Residential 240 2.3% ty's goals. To this end, the Future Land Use Plan identifies practical, "suburban-intensive" transit- • Zvago, a 58 unit senior cooperative under Manufactured Housing 108 1.0% supportive development strategies within the Ce- construction in 2018. Commercial 486 4.4% dar Avenue corridor and the surrounding area. Mixed Use 15 0.1% (See Chapter 4.) Industrial 187 1.7% Sand and Gravel 412 3.7% In addition to the METRO Red Line, there are Public/Institutional 490 4.4% several express and local bus routes within the City. These services are provided by the Minne- Existing Land Use Park and Open Space 1,753 15.7% sota Valley Transit Authority (MVTA). The MVTA Private Recreation 23 _ <1.0% operates peak express service to Downtown Min- Apple Valley's physical setting forms the foun- Vacant 7 _ 1.3% neapolis and Downtown St. Paul and crosstown dation of the Comprehensive Plan. Existing Water - 275 2.5% routes along Apple Valley's major arterials. See land use patterns influence the type and loca- Right-of-Way -—2,000 18.2% Chapter 8 for a full discussion of community tion of future development. Housing is the Total Calculated Acres 11,181 100.0% transit services. largest land use and a defining characteristic. Figure 3.8 shows a snapshot of land use in 2017. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Community Context 3-12 AppValley Figure 3.8- Existing Land Use -1 V a, f 1 ) l L- I f� l .7` _,T 1•y 1 EAGAN Existing Land Use 2017 ii////�I LEBANON HILLS VALLEYWOOD _ Rural Residential REGIONAL PARK MUNICIPAL ���� �� I MINNESOTA GOLF COURSE Low Density Residential ` ZOOLOGICAL GARDENS III `-.l Medium Density Residential `I • , High Density Residential r f; '----1*- Manufactured Housing r all�, Commercial „„I• ■. I w _ , - ; .,. - 7, ' '' t Mixed Use / 1111 Industriallit • silt 4 mil 4111111111111::' — , Public and Institutional iiirlr 1 , Park and Open Space a J Private Recreation o J iii Utilities /^mow 7 Ahmagnef ti= O, Sand and Gravel Lake 1 ri uJ Agricultural Vaik X jr, mr__[47.,, I a Nrcant /� n� a / Ce 1- L. 4 + Water am i"I �� to e Right of Way : AIM WM MINN, .� m r , •ei r .7:' I IN lb r r, 150THSTW •'` ' if �461111.JIiii LT.ill Lii Z II 11mob\ f1 ,K 'WI pollial_ rt I ' Miles - ' , ��� Cobblestone Lake ��lir� Lac Lavon11 G' Cnnsv -Group;- MUTT 3rvv I ��� „Is ' NORTH �- f..L LAKEVILL I �. _ . L ./— CITY OF APPLE VALLEY I 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Community Context 3-13 Apple Valley ey in organizing land uses. Most high-volume Aggregate Resources Some key aspects of the existing land use pattern commercial uses are located on higher clas- include: sification streets, such as arterials and collec- Municipalities must consult the Minnesota Geo- • Low density residential is the dominant land tors, which ensure that they are highly visible logical Survey, Aggregate Resources Inventory use. Single-family detached housing occupies to customers and reduces through traffic on of the Seven-county Metropolitan Area for the approximately 41% of Apple Valley's total land residential streets (Transportation - Chapter location of identified aggregate resources. The 8). extraction of aggregate resources and the rec- area. • The extension of a regional sanitary sewer lamation of mining areas has been a defining • Commercial uses, including retail, restaurants, characteristic of Apple Valley. The last remain- and commercial offices/services are primarily interceptor provides the capacity for land to be developed in southern sections of ing aggregate mining site in Apple Valley is concentrated in the Downtown Focus Area, Fischer Sand and Aggregate mine located along the Cedar Avenue and County Road 42 Apple Valley (Water Resources - Chapter 9). south of County Road 42. The 2009 Compre- corridors. hensive Plan identified this site for redevelop- • The municipal water system provides safe • Parks and open spaces are located through- drinking water and support for fire sup- ment, with a focus on establishing new job op- out the community and include the Minnesota pression (Water Resources - Chapter 9). portunities within a "mixed-business campus." Zoo, Lebanon Hills Regional Park, and Val- • Stormwater management systems are re- Portions of this area labeled as "Sand and leywood Golf Course. Between the zoo, golf quired to support development, but also Gravel" on the Existing Land Use Map, is be- course, and numerous parks, Apple Valley be- come defining physical features (storm ing reclaimed and redevelopment planning is maintains substantial acreage for open space water collection ponds are among the under way. Development of this site will occur and recreation. These parks and recreation more notable features) (Water physical in stages as mining is phased out. amenities are a point of community pride and Resources - Chapter 9). a defining quality-of-life asset for the City. The last large area of undeveloped land is • Parks, Trails and Open Space (Chapter 7) • the sand and gravel mining area located in influence the form of development and the Reclamation of the Fischer Sand and Aggre- quality of life in Apple Valley. gate is a significant economic development south central Apple Valley,which contains 414 opportunity. acres. The Fischer mining area is currently in • Public objectives for Economic Develop- operation and is expected to be reclaimed for ment and Redevelopment (Chapter 6) in- a variety of uses over the next several years fluence the use of land for commercial and industrial purposes. As existing land uses Other physical characteristics influence the future grow older, the need for reinvestment and growth and development of Apple Valley. The fol- the opportunity for redevelopment will in- lowing elements are discussed in greater detail in crease. other chapters of the plan: • Major street corridors are an important factor CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Community Context 3-14 Apple. Housing there was a net increase of 1,208 dwellings in Figure 3.9-Growth by Housing Type multi-family structures containing 10 or more units. The share of this housing type increased from iz,000 Housing comprises most of the land area in Apple � o Valley, accountingfor nearly50% of the existing9% of the overall housing stock to 14%. o Y io,000 land use. Housing shapes the form and character The housing supply contains a mix of architectural of the community. It influences who lives in Apple styles. Newer single-family housing is most 8,000 Valley today and in the future. According to the commonly a two-story design. Houses that are o, Co Census, there was net growth of 3,389 housing two or more stories represent 32% of all units. 6,000 units from 2000 to 2015, a 20% increase. Figure Nearly 40% of homes are "split level" style. Split- cn 3.9 illustrates this growth for different types of level and multi-story homes may not be suitable 4,000 il N housing, including single-family attached, single- for older residents wishing to age in place. N 00 family detached, and multi-family buildings of var- 2,000 1-711 ious sizes. 0 M o N m N N N N Housing Types 0 — — Mm a a .,,, •. •�5 .w5 t `ce re oc` ' ' o°` o.r� Single-family detached housing is the most com- `aewa `aa �,�o° y,�o' �&C Q,o` mon type of housing in Apple Valley. Nearly 53% .') ti ,�o° e'S. of all existing housing in 2015 was single-family r° detached housing. This type of housing is occu- °0¢ pied by a single family and is not physically con- ■z000 2015 nected to any other housing unit. However, the Source:2000 Census,2015 ACS housing supply is becoming more diverse, and the share of single-family detached housing contin- The median finished size for Apple Valley homes ues to decline due to an increase in higher densi- is 2,122 square feet. Over the last several de- ty multi-family development. In 1990, 68% of the City's housing stock consisted of single-family de- cades, the trend has been towards increasing tached housing. In 2000, that share was 61%, square footage. While larger homes are desirable and in 2015, it was down to 52%. Single-family today, it is important to ensure a variety of home attached homes (townhomes) and apartment sizes and floor plans to continue to improve the structures/senior housing with 10 or more units flexibility and affordability of Apple Valley's hous- account for 94% of the housing stock growth. Most ing stock. Figure 3.10 illustrates various dwelling multi-family growth is attributed to apartment fa- cilities with 10 units or more. From 2000 to 2015, types in Apple Valley. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Community Context 3-15 Apple Valley ey Figure 3.10-Dwelling Types rr' _ ` EAGANA D ellin e L 4� Single Family Residential dsOvilv rl. c - I t ■ Townhouse �•% Twin Home �• r • EETiving eir 40* $ FT?\ ���A4-_•.r ,�cr Manufactured Housing levi " .�- s; 1 - Long Lake �� f .._ t urs J E k V I /J Alimagnet mil,f',- , _ r ;r� 1 {� �. Lake ^- , 1 :) 140'H ST W r� lor w Q W Z iikg w J re w ::�� 2 0 IX ' i - — ii.r Y w . r41 m .:i Q Li On :• `.. a m r MPO ;i_ - Z au x O D3rt150TH ST W n ` II W Z w . j 0 0.25 0.5 � ‘11111'1 ''''. Miles leis ::r -� %+1 �,;�� � �''~ �`,-. Cobblestone Lake - Lac Lavon !` iti S. IGpI ,lnc. NORTH !! ld,. _''_' ..y" 11 .:LI \'''')- 160TH ST W L��� -, lc LAKEVILLL ig T CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update ..7.4 Community Context 3-16 Apple„ Housing Tenure Figure 3.11-HousingTenure Age of Housing Stock Most housing in Apple Valley is owner-occupied; 12,000 The age of the housing stock is a useful planning however, the share of renter-occupied housing units statistic. It is one indicator of historic growth pat- is increasing. The 2000 Census reported that 87% 10,000 terns. It is also a useful guide for future housing occupied housing units were owner-occupied. The maintenance needs. As housing ages, it requires 2015 ACS estimates that 78% of occupied housing 8,000 reinvestment to retain its value and integrity. is owner-occupied. This represents a significant change and is consistent with the increase in mul- 6,000 Lo Figure 3.12 illustrates the age of Apple Valley's tiple-family and attached housing that took place a housing stock by decade of construction. Over half between 2000 and 2015. This trend has continued 4,000 0 of all housing units are more than 30 years old.Ac- through 2017, with more than 1,000 additional mul- N cording to Dakota County property tax data, 52% O ti-family units either planned or under construction. 2,000 o of all housing units (through 2016)were built prior QD N °°Lr, to 1987. These units are primarilysingle-family. Rental housing is provided primarily by multiple- 1-1� a NI0 -- family structures. More than 55% of rental housing �a ea .:,5 .�5 .:,5 e5. was in structures with 10 or more units. Approxi- ae�a �c'S '6 �o� ote o� mately 26% of rental housing was single-family at- ti.§' ,�°; oo` ,��a�e� tached units. Approximately 10% of rental units ti roe were single-family detached. Since 2009, approxi- 4'o�,z, mately 1,300 multi-family dwelling units have been •Own •Rent added to Apple Valley's housing stock, which has increased the percentage of renter-occupied hous- Source:2015 ACS ing in the City. Figure 3.11 depicts housing tenure in Apple Valley. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Community Context 3-17 Apple Valley ey Figure 3.12-Age of HousingStock • i / Z. EAGAN Y ar Str re -f ' nor to 1971 '0 '•� ` r • 1971 1980 ef / g 1981 - 1990 1991 2000 ',WIMP i A k ' 17'..'"' ,,.0 ralm lio„r• L ,... _.1 I 2011 -2016 �I ` •J ...r , y �� Farquar Lake •�� ♦ �.• • w�_..�NcS' - 1 � ice � w: •4p 'R sidential Properties �;:= crF K`„ Lake ( ;:�• irti ' on9 ae _' • 1 S e.Dakota rntl^ti� - +.� f Allmagnet -I1 �; itA\fllagIT I- 411 ake Mr L Mal ��l�a:..> '140 Z • 1 w w % O ''''''d , . } a ix ui airii a W a ill re 0 oct • < I sari2 , 2 0 IY1 flik V Z ill > Y ♦ Z x o 0 150TH ST W O' a \, _ -! .__ a . Litryf .I'I' W Ng 0 0.25 0.5 < m•«. — ■ � �� . .. CI Miles �5 I'•� _ :." IIP�!'�� �f � Cobblestone Lake ��►� Lac // 1 �i ` y.r_ ..I-11 r7i�.tv •- •.. es:; lialm P NORTH :yip Ela 150TH ST W 11r.i.a ME 1 ALI LAKE 1L- CITY OF APPLE VALLEY I 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update :SS Community Context 3-18 Apple Growth Forecasts ranging from 400 to 600 persons per year. opment. Population growth will be primarily driven by migration. As the metropolitan area grows out- ward, Growth trends and projections are critical ele- The Census data implies that the average house- Apple Valley will have the advantage of being a sub- ments of the Comprehensive Plan. Historic trends hold size was 2.60 persons in 2010. The forecast urb that is closer to Minneapolis and St. Paul than describe how current conditions evolved and may assumes that the average household size will re- developing fringe cities, centrally located with- in the offer insights about future development. Looking main steady, declining slightly to 2.55 persons per southern suburbs. Therefore, it may be more likely to to 2040, Apple Valley will continue to grow as a household by 2040. retain and attract residents who would prefer to avoid place to live, work and shop. Projections of future longer commute times. development determine the demand for land, the Metropolitan Council has revised its previous fore- need for infrastructure and municipal services. cast to project a slower rate of job growth in Apple Looking ahead to 2040, a variety of macroeco- Valley. The updated forecast anticipates an in- nomic factors will influence actual growth out- Metropolitan Council Forecasts crease of 2,821 jobs from 2010 to 2040, or 20% comes, including the following: growth. This rate of job growth is slower than the Future growth is a critical consideration in updat- • National economic and housing market con- Futurep rate of population growth. In 2010, there were 0.29 in Apple Valley's Comprehensive Plan. The ditions. 9 pp Y p jobs per person;that ratio is expected to decline to Comprehensive Plan relies on the most recent 0.27 jobs per person in 2040. Most job growth in • Local development of suburban intensive fore- casts made by the Metropolitan Council. Ta- Apple Valley is forecasted to occur by 2020. This housing, utilities, and other infrastructure to ble 3.2 contains population, household, and em- support the forecasted growth. p p forecast will likely be revised following refinement ployment forecasts for 2020, 2030 and 2040 with and approval of a development plan for the Fischer • The cost and availability of energy. comparisons to actual totals for 2000 and 2010. Sand and Aggregate mining area. • Changing climate conditions that make the Twin Cities more or less favorable relative to Table 3.2-Council Growth Forecasts Forecasting for any local jurisdiction is a challenge. other regions in the United States. YEAR POP HH EMP The Metropolitan Council's forecasts were made * with the best available data. One benefit of the • Competition from other communities, particu- 2000 45,527 16,344 12,103 larly other communities in the Twin Cities met- 2010* 49084 18,875 14,279 forecasts is that they are rooted in a regional socio- ro area. economic model. Thus, they account for regional 2020** 55,500 21,700 15,800 • Redevelopment — 2030** 59,200 23,300 16,400 economic factors that are anticipated to exercise 2040** 63,600 24,900 17,100 general effects throughout the metropolitan area. Note that some of these factors are related. An important element of implementing the Compre- *census Count The level of uncertainty associated with the fore- hensive Plan will be to monitor these changes and **Council Forecast casts for Apple Valley is tempered by geographical their implications for the future of Apple Valley. constraints. The City is unlikely to grow dramatical- These forecasts show Apple Valley's population in- ly more than the forecasts given, simply because creasing by more than 13,000 people (30%) from it is running out of available land for development. 2010 to 2040. Growth is anticipated to besteady, Future growth will be driven primarily by redevel- CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Community Context 3-19 AppValley Local Housing Forecast Commercial Retail Trends aspects of community are intertwined. In fact, one of the primary goals of City government is to sus- A study of future housing needs in Dakota County Apple Valley is a thriving commercial hub. Com- tain/improve the health, safety, and welfare of the provides insights on future development in Apple mercial development slowed during the recession citizens of the community. The land use and built Valley. In 2013, Maxfield Research Inc. prepared but has since picked up. According to market environment of a community influence a variety of a Comprehensive Housing Needs Assessment studies by Maxfield Research Inc. there will be social, cultural, and economic characteristics, in- for the Dakota County Community Development continued demand for commercial uses through cluding the following: Agency. This study forecasts housing demand in 2030. • two stages, from 2010-2020 and 2020-2030. The Household size and composition study breaks down demand for rented and own- The success of online shopping has greatly im- • Housing affordability er-occupied single-family, multi-famil and senior pacted brick-and-mortar retail. In early 2017, for py Availability of good local jobs at a livable wage housing. Table 3.3 summarizes Apple Valley's example,there were more than 100 closures each by J.C. Penney, Sears, and Macy's. It is also rec- • Work/housing balance and commuting trends forecasted housing demand for 2020-2030. of those working and living in the community ognized that the top 25 online retailers all have Table 3.3-Housing Demand Forecast, brick and mortar retail. The emerging model for • Access to commodities and services 2020-2030 successful brick-and-mortar retail is focused . Places for interaction among residents Forecast around delivering a unique shopping experience. • Community diversity Tenure Type Over the course of this plan, the City will likely be Units In turn, the characteristics of the population influ- Single-family 625-636 affected by the closure of one or more large re- Own Multi-family 550-560 tailers, with impacts to local employment, con- ence many aspects of the community, including: sumption, and revenue generated by property and . Demands for goods and services Senior 50 sales taxes. This would provide opportunities for Market rate 590-610 • Demands for public services (recreation, infill, adaptive reuse, and redevelopment. One of l socia services, education, public safety) 100-275 Rent the intents of the future land use plan is to estab- Senior market rate 100-115 _ lish a community vision and provide guidance for • Economic capacity to support both private Senior affordable 155-162 the City to capitalize on these opportunities when businesses and local government. Total,all units 2,170-2,408 they occur. Source:Dakota County Housing Needs Assessment Characteristics of the Popula- The total forecasted demand for new units ranges tion from 2,170 to 2,408. This forecast is approximate- ly 50% higher than Metropolitan Council's fore- A comprehensive plan focuses most closely on casted household growth for 2020-2030, which is the physical aspects of community — land use, 1,600 households. parks, streets, and utilities. Nevertheless, plan- ning must recognize that the physical and social CITY OF APPLE VALLEY I 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Community Context 3-20 AppValley Figure 3.13-Age Distribution Figure 3.14-Population Pyramid 100% 6% 10% 12% 85 or over 0.4% .= 0.5% 90% 8% 80-84 0.6% -- 0.9% 13% 75-79 0.7% _- 1.1% 80% 33% 14% 70-74 1.3% 1.7% 70% 65-69 2.4% 2.4% 36% 60-64 2.8% 4.0% 60% 55-59 3.3% 3.7% 31% 29% 50-54 4.3% 1. 4.5% 50% 45-49 3.5/°° 4.1% 26% 40-44 3.4% = 3.4% 40% 21% 35-39 2.9% MI= 2.7% 30% 21°121% 30-34 3.2% M- ■m 3.9% 25-29 2.8% i�- 2.8% 20% 20-24 3.0% 2.7% 10% 330 15-19 3.4% EMII 2.9% 25% 10-14 4.1% 2.8% 0% 5-9 3.5% mIl 3.2% 1990 2000 2010 2015 Less than 5 3.9% 3.3% •Under 18 •18-34 35-54 ■55-64 ■65 and Over Source:Decennial Census,2015 ACS 5.0% 4.0% 3.0% 2.0% 1.0% 0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% Age of Population Percent of Total Population The characteristics of Apple Valley's population are Male •Female changing. Figure 3.13 shows that population has aged consistently. In 1990, Apple Valley was a Source:2015 ACS place primarily made up of families with children. ley are similar to Dakota County as a whole. Existing Cohort Composition Thirty-five percent (35%) of the 1990 population was under age 18 and only 7%of Apple Valley res- Figure 3.14 shows the existing composition of idents were 55years of age or older. By2015, the Apple Valley's population, broken down by age 9 Roughly half of the population growth in Da- and sex. The distribution is consistent for children proportion of residents age 18 or younger had fall- kota County will occur in the population group through young adults. This shape corresponds to en to 18`)/0 while the share of residents aged 55 or aged 65 or over. over had grown to 26%. The trends in Apple Val- steady, but not rapid, growth in Apple Valley.There CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Community Context 3-21 Apple is a bulge for baby boomers focused around the Figure 3.15-Forecasted Population Change by Age Cohort in Dakota County,2015-2040 age 50-54 cohort. This bulge will move toward the top of the pyramid over the timeline for this plan. 10,240 There are more males than females for every co- 8,563 hort under age 24. Forecasted Age Composition 5,847 11,325 The aging of the population will be one of the pri- mary demographic trends over the life of this Comprehensive Plan. The State Demographer v provides detailed population forecasts for each co county, broken down by age cohort. These fore- v casts can be used to supplement the forecasts Z from Metropolitan Council. Figure 3.15 illustrates 6,708 the change that is forecasted for each cohort in 6,417 5,525 6,057 Dakota County, from 2015 to 2040. The height of 4,662 I 4,L S.i I 3,049 the bars indicates percent change and the data la- z,o95 1,970 2,373 bels indicate the total magnitude of the change. ■ ■ I . 420 I -598 I 1 Roughly half of the forecasted population -3,205 growth in Dakota County will occur in the -5,187 population group aged 65 or over. <5 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75-79 80-84 85+ Age Cohort The State Demographer projects total population Source:Minnesota State Demographer growth of 70,514 for Dakota County. Growth in the Because this projection is for Dakota County While the overall population will grow older, it is cohorts aged 65 or over account for more than half (population 413,000), Apple Valley will experience more difficult to predict what this trend means for of this increase. The largest net increase is for the only a fraction of the growth depicted. Neverthe- Apple Valley. Several questions highlight the chal- age 70-74 cohort, which is projected to grow by less, the general trends for Dakota County are lenge of forecasting the aging of Apple Valley's 11,325.This increase is accompanied by a decline similar for Apple Valley, and the City will experi- population: in the number of individuals aged 45-54. Little ence similar impacts as demand for goods and •services responds to the needs of changing de How long will current baby boomer residents growth is anticipated for the cohorts of children, of larger single-family houses choose to stay youth, and teenagers. mographics. in these homes? CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Community Context 3-22 AppValley • Will more seniors opt to live alone, with family, Figure 3.16-Household Types Figure 3.17-Average Household Size or with peers? 100% 4.00 • Will seniors have fewer financial resources? If El ® El 10% so, how does this affect the community? . Ea • Will Apple Valley offer the housing options, 80% physical characteristics, infrastructure and 3.0e 24% 26% services that attract seniors? 35% 3.00 2.78 2.772.70 2.70 49% 2.56 2.53 2.582.60 These questions frame important elements of the 60% z.so 2.562.5�Z.so relationship between land use and the character- istics of the people who live in Apple Valley. 23% 24% 19% 2.00 40% Household Size I. A household includes all the people who occupy 20% a housing unit as their place of residence. Histor- lk% 36% 37% 1.00 IP ical data shows that household size has de- creased each decade for fifty years. After dec- I 0% ades of reduction, the number of people living in 1990 2000 2010 2015 each home is leveling off. In 1960, the Census •Unmarried family with kids Non-familyhoushold 0.00 1990 2000 2010 2015 reported that average household size in Apple Married family with kids Live alone •Apple Valley . Dakota County Twin Cities Metro Valley was 5.27 people. Fifty years later, the av- •Family,no kids erage household size is 2.58 persons. The current Source:2015 ACS Source:Decennial Census,2015 Metropolitan Council Estimate. estimate from the 2015 ACS is 2.56. The smaller Figure 3.16 depicts average household size in Ap- • From 1990 to 2015, the share of households household size is consistent with societal trends ple Valley. Figure 3.17 shows how the composition in- toward smaller families. The average household that consisted of a family with no children g of households has changed over time. creased from 27% to 37%. size in Apple Valley is now similar to the average household size for Dakota County as well as to Other 2015 trends that are evident from the charts: Race the rest of the metro. • 71% of Apple Valley households are family Racial diversity is increasing in Apple Valley. The households.This is down from 83% in1990. 2015 ACS reports that 81.2% of the population Household size has decreased steadily for 50 identifies as white, down from 83.8% in 2010 and years. This trend is likely to continue with • From 1990 to 2015, the share of households ° that included children under the age of 18 de 91.8/o in 2000. Meanwhile, minority groups are significant growth in the number of one- and g two-person senior households. creased from 56%to 34%. growing.The racial diversity of Apple Valley's 2015 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Community Context 3-23 AppValley population is similar as that of Dakota County, but Figure 3.18-Race and Ethnicity less than the region as a whole. An important factor in understanding race data is American Indian and Alaska the reporting of the Hispanic population. People Native alone,0.17% who identify their origin as Spanish, Hispanic, or Black or African American alone, Latino are not classified as a separate racial cat- 5.27% egory. The 2015 ACS estimates that 2,268 people are Hispanic or Latino.This represents 4.5%of the White alone, ..401114( Asian alone,5.02% current population. Figure 3.18 depicts the racial 81.88% _ Some other race alone,0.02% and ethnic composition of Apple Valley. —411111111111 Hispanic or Latino,4.51% Income Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone,0.01% Income influences many aspects of community. Two or more races,3.11% Income provides the capacity to acquire housing and to purchase goods and services from local Source:2015 ACS businesses. Higher incomes tend to correlate with better public school systems. Figure 3.19 shows Figure 3.19-Median Household income median household incomes in Apple Valley, Da- kota County, and the Twin Cities metro. The val- $100.0 ues in Figure 3.19 are reported in nominal terms $78.6 $80.5 — they have not been adjusted for inflation. The $80.0 $69.8 S72 9 $75.6 $68.8 most important takeaway from the figure is that $61.9 i $65.2 the average household income in Apple Valley is o $60.0 $50.0 $54.3 consistently higher than the average household . $42.2 $36.6 income for Dakota County as well as the Twin Cit- 2 $40.0 ies metro. $20.0 The distribution of incomes provides additional in- formation about the economic standing of the $o.o community: 1990 2000 2010 2015 • 37.7% of households earn $100,000 or more. ■Apple Valley Dakota County Twin Cities Source:Decennial Census,2015 ACS CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Community Context 3-24 Apple. • 7.1% of households earn $200,000 or more. below.Wage stagnation is one explanation for this of households earn less than$25,000. Figure 3.20-Percent Poverty • 10.3% trend, noticeable during the recession period dis- Poverty 16.0% cussed. 2.9% Educational Attainment To estimate the incidence of poverty, the Census 14.0% 3.6% defines a set of income thresholds based on house- . The Census shows that Apple Valley residents are hold characteristics. These thresholds vary by the 12.0% increasingly well educated. From 1990 to 2015, 4.1% size of the household and the age of household the percentage of the population aged 25 or older 10.0% members, and are adjusted yearly for inflation. No ■ that did not attend college decreased from 29.8% distinction is made for geography and cost of living. $o% 2.8% to 22.7%. Meanwhile, the percentage of the Thus, it is misleading to compare the poverty rates population with a graduate or professional degree for areas with significantly different characteristics. 6.0% 2.5% increased from 7.8% to 14.5% In 2015, 29.3% of Likewise, it is misleading to isolate one povertyIII 2 2% the population aged 25 or older had obtained a statistic with no reference to trends over time. In- 4.0% bachelor's degree and another 14.4% had ob- 2.2%stead, it is useful to review historical povertydata 5.2% tamed a graduate or professional degree, bringing to identify the extent to which poverty is increasing 2.0% 3 5% the total percentage of adults with bachelor's de- or decreasing for a given community. It can also be 2.1% grees and beyond to over 43.7%. helpful to compare poverty rates within a region if o.0% 1990 2000 2010 2015 Employment there is minimal variance in the cost of living. Persons between 150%and 184%of poverty Historically, Apple Valley has relatively low levels of Persons between 100%and 149%of poverty Employment touches many aspects of community poverty, but poverty has increased in recent years. Persons below poverty level life. Jobs provide the income to pay for housing o Source:Decennial Census,2015 ACS and topurchase goods and services. The location In 2000, 2.1 /o of the population reported incomes below the poverty level. In 2010, the poverty rate ing; the percent of the population below the pov- of jobs influences the amount of time that Apple was 5.2%. The current ACS estimate from 2015 erty level, the percentage of people earning 100 to Valley residents are in the community each day. shows that 7.5% of the population of Apple Valley 149%of the poverty threshold, and the percentage Commuting decisions affect transportation sys- is living below the poverty level. This is similar to earning 150 to 185% of the poverty threshold. terns, and the work-housing balance impacts lo- the poverty rate for Dakota County(7.7%), but less From 2010 to 2015, the poverty level increased cal tax revenue and expenditures. Apple Valley than the poverty rate for the Twin Cities metro area while the percentage of individuals earning 100- residents who commute to another jurisdiction for (10.3%). 185% of the poverty threshold decreased, a gen- work utilize public services outside Apple Val- ley eral indication that many individuals who were throughout the day and contribute to the local Figure 3.20 shows povertytrends overtime includ- close to the poverty level in 2010 have now fallen economies of other jurisdictions. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Community Context 3-25 Apple Figure 3.21-Employment By Industry Figure 3.22-Place of Work Information,0.9% Finance and Minnetonka 2.0% Insurance,4.6% Manufacturing,4.7% Other Services,Ex.Public Eden Prairie 2.4% Health Care and Admin,3.7% Social Assistance, Edina 3.0% 11.9% Professional and Technical Services,2.5% Lakeville 3.5% Ali Public Administration, St.Paul � 6.5% 5.3% Educational Services,17.4% / Burnsville 7.7% Real Estate and Rental r. and Leasing,1.9% Eagan r.4% 444 Bloomington 9.5% Arts and Entertainment,3.2% Retail Trade,22.4% Apple Valley 11.4% Minneapolis 12.0% All Other Industries, Accommodation 5.6% and Food Services, 13.6% All other locations Mb JM 33.5% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% Source:2014 ACS data via On the Map. WholesaleTrade,/ / Transportation and Warehousing,1.0% Place of Employment 1.2% Source:Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages,2nd Quarter,2015 The Census tracks the location of work place for the The Quarterly Census of Employment and Wag- Figure 3.21 shows a breakdown of employment population. In 2014,only 11.4%of residents in Apple es (QCEW)provide quarterly data on employment by industry for Apple Valley residents for the sec- Valley reported a place of employment in Apple Val- by industry for local geographies. Three industries and quarter of 2015. ley; the other 89% of residents commuted outside employ more than half of the workforce: Retail the City. Approximately 37.7% of Apple Valley resi- Trade, Educational Services, and Accommodation dents work in Dakota County, while 39.5% travel to and Food Services. Health care, another major Hennepin County. The City of Minneapolis employs industry, employs 12% of the workforce. Note that a higher share of Apple Valley residents than Apple the majority of local jobs are filled by individuals Valley itself. Figure 3.22 depicts the place of work who live outside of Apple Valley. for Apple Valley residents. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Community Context 3-26 Apple. technologies such as automated vehicles (AVs) the effects of climate change and other vulnerabili- In 2014, the Census recorded 16,327 jobs in Apple and connected vehicles (CVs), and changing ties. Many cities in America have adopted resilience Valley. Of these, 13,312 (81.5%)were filled by peo- economic conditions, such as the scaled transi- plans and shared their strategies with one another. ple living elsewhere, and 3,015 (18.5%) were filled tion to renewable energy sources. (www.100resilientcities.org). by the local workforce. Meanwhile, 23,367 workers commuted outside the City for work. Therefore, 0 Practicing Sustainability Both terms, sustainable and resilient, are used in Apple Valley is a net exporter of jobs.This is reflect- and Resilience this plan. Sometimes, either word may be appro- ed in its land use patterns, with relatively more resi- priate. For example, efforts to expand the use of dential acreages than commercial and industrial Apple Valley values the natural environment. solar as an energy resource are sustainable—this acreages. Workplace location also affects daily Natural amenities promote physical, cognitive, resource is renewable — and resilient, because commuting trends, with high shares of workers and emotional health. The natural environment solar, combined with an adequate energy storage pro- vides ecosystem services, such as water fil- commuting by personal vehicle. system, is an ideal backup power source to pro- tration and recharge. Most amenities and ser- tect against potential outages. Commuting vices—clean water and air, forests, sunlight, wind — are or can be commoditized to some degree, Travel-to-work data shows a strong dependence meaning they have economic value as well as Sustainability — Maintaining the quality and on automobiles. The share of Apple Valley's work- abundance of natural resources and the services environmental value. For example, in 2017, the they provide for future generations to use and en- force that drives alone to work is 81.6%.The work- Urban Land Institute reported analytics for green • force makes limited use of public transportation, boy infrastructure and water management demon- with 4.7% of commuters using that mode. How- Resilience— The capacity of natural,political, and strating added public and private value. Thus, economic systems to avoid, withstand, and re- ever, use of public transit has grown 1.6°/° since there is intrinsic and economic value in conserv- cover from disruptions without losing the ability to 2000 due to the increase in transit services avail- ing resources and, increasingly, by investing in per-form their basic functions. able. The percentage of workers who work from partnerships, technologies, and industries that home is increasing, consistent with global trends. advance sustainability goals. Recognizing these The following text describes Apple Valley's recent The 2015 Census reported a mean commute time benefits, Apple Valley seeks to maintain the efforts regarding environmental sustainability and of 24.5 minutes. quantity and quality of its natural resources for fu- resilience.The City has undertaken a variety of ini- These commuting patterns are reflective of Apple ture generations to use. This is a common defini- tiatives in recent years to demonstrate best prac- Valley's suburban setting in the Twin Cities region. tion of sustainability. tces in its own endeavors and encourage similar practices by the private sector. By setting and The decision to live or work in Apple Valley will A related term that has gained wider usage is re- achieving goals for sustainable action and envi- continue to be influenced by the cost of travel, silience. Resiliency is the ability to avoid, with- which includes the cost of fuel and the cost of tray- ronmental stewardship, the City promotes a high stand, or bounce back from stress or shock.These Quality of life that is attractive to prospective resi- el time, which reduces worker productivity and/or shocks may stem from environmental, economic, workers' leisure time. Over the timeline of this dents and employers, and which reflects the val- or societal changes,. Thrive MSP 2040, the Twin plan, these factors will be influenced by emerging Cities regional plan, encourages cities to plan for ues of current citizens and industry. By cement- CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Community Context 3-27 AppValley ting these goals and expanding its sustainability GreenStep initiative. gram to other areas of the City. The ongoing part- and resilience initiatives, the Comprehensive nership with Dakota Electric also enabled positive Plan will continue to promote wise, efficient man- Performance Buildings 0 change for private residences. Using grants from the agement of local resources to foster enduring Several public facilities demonstrate principles of Joyce Foundation and the Environment and Natural prosperity. sustainable building design and operation. The Resources Trust Fund, the City created incentives following buildings have attained recognition from for home- owners to participate in its Better Energy GreenStep City 0 Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design Program. In two years, this program helped 780 (LEED) or Green Globes, two national rating sys households install 16,680 CFL light bulbs, 759 low- The Minnesota GreenStep Cities program is a flow shower heads, and 1,491 low-flow aerators. public-private initiative that guides and recogniz- terns. Simple, low-cost improvements like these can have es communities for achievement of sustainability . Apple Valley Municipal Center, features ex- a big impact on energy savings. goals. Apple Valley resolved to become a Green- tensive use of daylight harvesting to minimize Step City in 2011 and achieved Step 3 status in artificial lighting, as well as an innovative Water Monitoring and Resto- Co 2015, having implemented many new best prac- storm water management system (LEED) ration tices during that time. At the time, Step 3 was the . Apple Valley Liquor Store#3 sources its pow- highest status that could be achieved. Since then, Apple Valley supports several volunteer opportu- er entirely from a geothermal well located un- the GreenStep program has expanded to Steps 4 der the parking lot, a first-of-its-kind facility in nities to monitor water quality. This data helps the and 5. The City aspires to become a Step 5 the state. (Green Globes, Two Globes) City understand the local and regional impacts to GreenStep City, which requires it to establish ad- the watershed and make informed decisions • Apple Valley Senior Center, features daylight about future development and mitigation. As the ditional performance metrics and demonstrate harvesting, in-floor radiant heating, and a quantifiable progress toward achieving its goals. green roof. (Green Globes, Two Globes) saying goes, cities can't manage what they don't The Comprehensive Plan is a starting point for measure. Through the Council's Citizen Assisted • Valleywood Clubhouse, features extensive Monitoring Program (CAMP), volunteers collect achieving this goal. For example, the Great Plains use of daylighting and other energy efficient I water quality samples from five local lakes. A sim- nstitute produced a report of Apple Valley's base- elements. (Green Globes, Three Globes) line energy usage. Using GPI's Wedge application, ilar initiative, the Wetland Health Evaluation Pro- the City can model the effect of the various car- 6 gram (WHEP), is used to track the health of Apple Efficient Utilities Valley's wetlands. bon-cutting strategies. To demonstrate quantita- The City has used funding from the American tive improvements in other sustainability areas, Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA — the the City must establish a similar method for quan- economic stimulus package of 2009) to install tifying existing conditions and policy impacts. energy efficient lighting and automated building During preparation of the Comprehensive Plan, a and HVAC controls in many public facilities. It high level of public support for sustainable initia- partnered with Dakota Electric Company to create tives indicates there is local momentum to create a pilot zone for LED street lights, which has al- a citizen task force charged with overseeing the lowed it to test these fixtures and expand the pro- CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Community Context 3-28 AppValley State's intent to increase its renewable standard dark areas have low potential. It is estimated that Recycling from 25% to 50% by the year 2030. If this goal is rooftop solar in Apple Valley could generate up to •City recycling education is conducted by Dakota met, the State will benefit from improved air quali- 250,000 megawatt hours per year, given rooftop as- Valley Recycling, which also performs recycling ty, lower energy costs, and the creation of skilled availability and current technology, which education services for Burnsville, Eagan, and jobs in emerging industries. Statewide, the re- sumes 10% conversion efficiency. If even a frac- Lakeville. Dakota Valley Recycling conducts resi- newable standard — the amount of energy tion of this resource potential were developed, it dential curbside recycling education in Apple Val- sourced from renewables — surpassed 20% in could power several hundred homes. ley. The program also offers recycling education 2016. Apple Valley's subdivision regulations protect ac- and assistance to businesses and other commu- cess to solar in new development and existing Regional Guidance nity organizations. The County is updating its solid developments, stating that in the case of all plat- waste master plan with the goal of recycling 75% Apple Valley has chosen to participate in the Re- ting, the subdivision may be evaluated for its ori- of waste by 2030. gional Indicators Initiative, a program offered by entation for possible solar energy system use and Great Plains Institute. By partnering with metro- for its potential impacts to adjacent property. This Energy ® politan communities, GPI provides an assessment criterion does not expressly prohibit or restrict de- To become more resilient and sustainable, one of of energy usage and helps communities visualize velopment which impedes solar potential, but it the biggest improvements Apple Valley can make the steps needed to reach their energy reduction could be applied as such. The extent to which this is to increase the amount of energy that is con- targets, through the Local Government Project for criterion is consistently prioritized will affect sus- sumed from renewable sources. The award- Energy Planning (LoGoPEP). This program bene- tainability outcomes. In addition to local regula- winning design of several public buildings fits all localities, which can compare their plans tions, solar easements are enabled under Minne- demonstrates the City's commitment to minimize with one another and with the State's 50 by '30 sota Statute 500.30 Subd. 3. Solar activities can its carbon footprint and improve efficiency. Per- plan. also be regulated through zoning if necessary. formance buildings feature daylight harvesting, Solar Appendix I provides a further accounting of Apple geothermal power, or a green roof. There is po- Valley's energy trends and charts strategies for tential for larger savings when best practices are Solar energy is the most abundant resource in developing solar potential in addition to other re- extended to the private sector. Since 2007, Apple Minnesota. Solar output has expanded rapidly newables. General energy goals are included for Valley business have installed more than 100 ef- as technology has improved and the price of so- Land Use, Economic Development, and other ficiency projects and cut annual energy bills by lar has dropped. Yet, this resource remains relevant chapters of the plan. $285,000. underutilized. Total insolation in Apple Valley is approximately 30 million megawatt hours per State Guidance year. Figure 3.23 shows how this gross solar In February 2016, Minnesota introduced the 50 potential is distributed across Apple Valley. by '30 Initiative, a bipartisan bill formalizing the Bright orange areas have high potential and CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Community Context 3-29 Apple„ Wind Figure 3.23 - Local Solar SuitabilityMap • Ire - ¢" > ':.E . 4 Wr .1— Y In general, community-sourced wind has less po- . - tential than solar. Small-scale wind turbines are .. ',Ili':. - �� •(i; x less efficient and more visually disruptive than so- y � a r lar. Figure 3.24 shows wind potential for the state r.41 • i v -- ,.." , of Minnesota; the urbanized metro has some of a _ ...�` �• ,1 the lowest potential for direct wind generation in the state. Nevertheless, electricity produced fromoiomme a t f ' ` Aga � � t - - # .. regional wind farms provides a significant contri- (\' 4 . - 1 . ,�, ,, �v .. ' bution to Apple Valleys energysupply. Xcel En- x �� -. 1, 4• ppi �' ergyis routinelyrated as the nation's topwind �kie..7rk:i. . 4 `"' -. "*° vane '�i ,?, u ; Mr "El-k� r. r � s energy utility. ? �-., ` M, R- ' ¢ . ; ". er M .1.,Ai Y,,.�p,�. - ,a^ ,-�y�� W °d°ki ww+ r� t e'`� -R I P rl .' �F '?i _ b 42 1- '-. l'f-1 ,•- -'''kIZN7-'''''. .-:-. -7 ,...,'''',`',,f'."..7.0-, 1 "tl --' -2--/—_-3-, --- - , .,,,--izr:---"' V.• '116::4,4.,' -'.,::;;::;-.''' t,. ;11/) r4‘,..., a_..� ray..7. r� ,, �J:''� - —17.n -- ,r' 7'. — "",` i tt p� yx� Vie fJ�� - .`"" m-_. ik `�"",� ,�- -'ga te. 1130i2016 0 os 1 in Extent of Main Map m.ies Ili ANOKA 1 Gross Solar Potential •p� (Watt-hours per Year) METo wASHINGTey. High:1287678 InHENNEPIN I'i RAMSEN' I- rr 1 ��t m Low:900001 • i } x i - Solar Potential under 900,000 watt-hours per year 13 ' yr I mu -1 t__-7 Ir County Boundaries f 7A SCOTT -- -- 4r TACO TA City and Township Boundaries I f r all , Open Water Features MO Source:University of Minnesota U-Spatial Statewide Solar Raster. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update •F..4: Community Context 3 30 Apple Figure 3.24- Minnesota WindPotential Minnesota's Wind Resource by Wind Speed at 30 meters J III IMP -c4"-.,'. , -:Ir M. , .'.`} 'fit F, y "-' 1 , ?- Wind Speed ' • Uilk MPH (m/s) y' ~- . Y Ar .w -0.0-9.0(0.00-4.02) I •_ i = . �sy-y I10.0-11.0(4.47-4.92) k.J�'� ir �'7� kigp �XS 9" > 11.0-12.0(4.92-5.36) ore Y' I12.0-12.5(5.36-5.59: f 1 i 12.5-13.0(5.59-5.81;i 13.0-13.5(5.81-6.04; 13.5-14.0(6.04-6.26: 14.0-14.5(6.26-6.48; -14.5-15.0(6.48-6.71; 11111 Ng -:: -15.0-15.5(6.71-6.93; 15.5-16.0(6.93-7.15: I-I=16.5-17.5(7.15 38-7.60; -16.5-17.0(7.38-7.60; -17.0-17.5(7.60-7.82; 6054,billirimi, IVIINNESOTA . DEPARTMENT OF �, 72 ` iCOMMERCE WindLOgrc:� This map has been prepared under contract by WindLogics for the Department of Commerce using the best available weather da- ta sources and the latest physics-based weather modeling technology and statistical techniques.The data that were used to de- velop the map have been statistically adjusted to accurately represent long-term(40 year)wind speeds over the state,thereby in- corporating important decadal weather trends and cycles.Data has been averaged over a cell area 500 meters square,and within any one cell there could be features that increase or decrease the results shown on this map.This map shows the general vari a- tion of Minnesota's wind resource and should not be used to determine the performance of specific projects. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Ave. Community Context 3-31 Apple Community Context Increasing Diversity of jobs. Implications for 2040 Potential Plan Considerations: Race and ethnicity, as well as the types of house- The Community Context chapter is more than sim- holds (e.g. live alone, married with kids, non- • Focus on attracting and accommodating more ply gauging the existing conditions of Apple Valley family, etc.) are becoming increasingly diverse in development that caters to higher wage jobs, and gaining an understanding of various trends Apple Valley. such as: affecting the community. Impactful issues can be • Commercial Office; medical office/ drawn out of the data that will inform plan policies Potential Plan Considerations: clinics and strategies. These issues are outlined below. Planning decisions need to be increasingly • Business Parks; mixed use sensitive to the needs of a diversifying popu- • Industrial Parks; limited industrial Community Aging lation. • Reduce in-commuting of the lower wage work- The age 70-74 cohort is projected to have the • Park and recreation facilities and community force by expanding housing options and other largest net increase through 2040 of any age co- events will become increasingly important as pathways to increasing housing affordability. hort. The population above 65 years is projected areas that bring different races, ethnicities, Housing Affordability to have significant increases in Apple Valley as age groups, and others together as a com- munity. Average household incomes are higher in Apple baby boomers continue to age. Valley than for Dakota County and the Twin Cities • Encourage new development and redevel- Potential Plan Considerations: opment to provide a variety of household metro. However, the incidence of poverty is in- types to better accommodate the changing creasing in Apple Valley and throughout the re- • If seniors are to be kept in the community, gion.While Apple Valley is affordable for most res- housing policies and options will need to be population. idents, there is a general lack of affordable hous- flexible for their needs; offering support to Jobs-Housing Balance ing for low-income earners throughout the Twin age-in-place and new housing choices sought by seniors. Apple Valley imports its lower-wage work force. Cities metro. Apple Valley is committed to meet- The top four employers in Apple Valley by Indus- ing its share of the regional affordable housing • Parks and trails are not only important for requirement and increasinglocal access to well- try (Health Care and Social Assistance, Educa- q younger segments of the population. Public paying, head-of-household jobs. recreational spaces can be designed to better tion- al Services, Accommodation and Food Ser- vices,seniors. vices, and Retail Trade), representing over 65% of Potential Plan Considerations: those employed in Apple Valley, support average • As the population as a whole becomes older, • Increase the supply and mix of housing types the demand for health care will likely increase, hourly wages below the metro average. The ma- to allow more opportunities for affordable Future land uses need to provide flexibility to jority of these jobs are filled by people living out- rents and mortgages. allow more clinics, medical offices, hospitals, side of the City. Conversely, 89% of those who live • and related facilities. in Apple Valley work elsewhere. The relative lack Consider housing proximity to below-average of high wage job opportunities encourages resi- wage industries in order to retain and grow dents to commute to other cities for those types this workforce in Apple Valley and sup- CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Community Context 3-32 AppValley port associated industries. Development Opportunities ability or resiliency initiatives—for example, the price • Continue to strengthen multi-modal infra- of harvesting solar energy is rapidly decreasing to structure: pedestrian, bicycle, and transit op- The Fischer Sand and Aggregate Mining Area and the point where transition from conventional fuels is tions need to be made increasingly available. the downtown Central Village area represent the justifiable on economic grounds, not just ethical last areas with significant opportunities for new ones. • Maintain the Manufactured Home Park as a development of significant scale. valuable affordable housing commodity. Several emerging technologies could impact Ap- Potential Plan Considerations: ple Valley between now and 2040, although there National Retail Trends • The City must leverage these coveted areas is uncertainty about when or whether they will be The current nationwide retail bubble requires to provide development that solves issues adopted, the scale of adoption, and the magnitude monitoring and repositioning, given the significant identified in the Community Context, primarily of their effects on urban systems. For example,the amount of retail space currently available in Apply including development that: emergence of automated and connected vehicles Valley. Moving forward, new retail development • Attracts a high-wage workforce is widely touted as a defining moment for person- opportunities have the potential to in-fill sought af- al transportation, but the commercial adoption of ter and amenity retail choices. Top internet sellers • Allows for medical services these technologies has been limited thus far; and continue to have brick and mortar stores. while American automakers have invested in elec- • Provides a variety of housing options Potential Plan Considerations: on a limited basis in the mining area tric vehicle production, their ability to meet their • The conventional formula of big box stores production goals is still largely dependent on pub- and strip malls with significant retail square • Provides multiple uses at a higher in- lic subsidy. The best way Apple Valley can ac- footage is not the only way to provide retail tensity and density than how the City cornmodate these and other nascent technologies opportunities. Encourage the diversification has historically developed is to develop a policy framework that addresses of the City's retail development. Consider in- Ensure that these areas are well connected them now. This will allow the City to leverage •creased intensity of retail space, allowing for into the surrounding urban fabric through public-private relationships and make guided, smaller square footage retail space to in- careful development design and the consid strategic in- vestments when opportunities be- crease opportunities for small and medium eration of multi-modal connections. come available. sized businesses, to reduce the City's reli- ance on large chain retailers. Technology Trends Apple Valley seeks to promote equitable technol- ogy development and expanded access to tech- • For older, or more at-risk big box store and As technological change opens new frontiers, nology through continued reinvestment in public strip mall locations, provide contingency plans Apple Valley envisions itself as a regional leader services and consistent community engagement. in the event such locations cannot attract re- for new technologydeployment and investment. placement retail businesses. Envision what Fiber optics to the home and business is one ex- post-retail uses might fit into targeted loca- Technological improvements increase work effi- ample with the ability to grow once the tions. ciency, resulting in greater financial savings, fur- cost/benefit has been addressed. ther investment, and economic growth. Many technologies will enable progress toward sustain- CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Community Context 3-33 Apple. 4. Land Use The Vision for the future of Apple Valley lays the portunities for infill development and redevel- foundation for the Comprehensive Plan. The opment and are the core areas for commerce Land Use Plan, in turn, provides the framework and job development. Figure 4.1 illustrates the for guiding land use to achieve this vision. This general boundaries of these are- as. The plan Chapter includes several key elements that ex- calls for them to be connected via an extension press the vision through maps,goals,guidelines, of the Ring Route and enhanced transit service. and policy statements. These elementsinclude: There is a focus on enhancing accessibility to • Focus Areas (page 4-5) transit, housing, and employment within the Ce- dar Avenue corridor and the County Road 42 4 • Description of Land Use Categories(page 4 17) corridor. (See the Focus Areas Section for fur- ' ther discussion.) • The Future Land Use Map (page 4-18) The Land Use Plan describes objectives, strat- a1*d, ii II I • Land Use Goals and Policies (page 4-32) egies, and design guidelines that correspond to II �r These elements are the primary tools for guiding the unique challenges and opportunities in these future land use in accordance with the commu- focus areas. To implement its vision in these . „r, nity's vision. The Future Land Use Map guides areas, the City may need to solidify its strate- ": I � - P ,cre uses for eachparcel in the City. this ice Y gies through formal policies, i.e., through land use plan is intended to be flexible because amendments to the zoning code, parking re it is anticipated that most growth will occur quirements, etc. For example, the City could through redevelopment, of which the exact loca- formalize its policies for accessibility and densi- tion and character cannot be specified. ty through the application of a transit-oriented _ The plan refers to focus areas, which are priori- development overlay district. The recommenda- 6 _.... , tized for development and/or redevelopment. tions in the Plan are intended as a guide to fa- Two areas, the Fischer Sand and Gravel Mining cilitate future policy implementation. Area and Downtown, represent the largest op- Milk: CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Land Use 4-1 AppValley Figure 4.1- Priority Planning Areas with Ring Route Extension w w C3 a > a > a w ct • Lu m (•,- Lu u_ (9 o r 5<"6- LL a I. z -- E2 iimankl-'.,''. '''.--177,'• i ;4' ' -I Cn I- 1 1 ,:,.. -71 . . ._ ., . -.,!0-T.r, ,. .. . . _ ,, , ,,, _, < 0 u., E_. 1..... _.,, I.v,,,.___„.,... . ,%.,, z,..i,,,,, ,„ .. .. .,_..,,,,,:., . :ig ''...,' 0, r- "rig., ,Iii,•,„;'.'.' 4- 1 jele.F 1.1-1 < (-) 41 lg. s M w > Z 0 --3 ., • <X , 1 ct < • . .. 0.......0 .................ik ,i,...1.;_ii ,:.,, -- ,:. C.) .. .. .0,..,4,• aw'44 7...,,:., 0-. ' . •l'i 11 I •-- -''' -- 'f., I LJUN Pr Downtown Core 42 a , . -,7,-----7,-..-- - - . , (Retail/Officel, - - _ _ _ - _ ......,... ____ ., a 0 - 0 , • m z - ...7.- -•,,,, -- it m z .. • m w . ct. , Fischer Mine Area - (Employment/Industry) I i i, 1 ' . ...., 153RD ST W -- m -, ',,,-- z. - •'-'•'''' ' ..' ' .. • . off - m 4 , , . ,, •,..c ,(-- 4'.• . . m 2 ' • s 1—-, ' I• • — 1 _ _ • ,,-_, --, , • I .........a......3......C.* J T --..„,---- - rrel"..111 H'i '1F1-' - 10 s, ,I.,.._ ,.,,.r,,I, 4 , it--,tr* t ili --'-'77747t*6-` .. •:-...,—,. '..';'--.c .,4 ...-'' 'ipto(k,k-- •ilr 155TH PKWY LEGEND -, - .1 -.•._ *.-- — Original Ring Route it 1 . ... Proposed Ring Route Extension.. A - 13,3334/4 ., - ---i - - ' .., i - . - —14 • `141400404d1 giS'_ .• - •, , - liewoot.,.,&itirlt-vIlf-r xt x,..,,,, 0 0.25 0.5 160TH ST W NORTH Miles — --, 4'.'4--;_--t_:eili,f4la 4 44 OIL...'.fiks.lAtiakikailiKiitl-k. L..,..i.,..'5.4'IC.I-2.,'-....--:,,•1 ..._ .-,,,, -,, I CITY OF APPLE VALLEY I 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update 455:. Land Use 4-2 Apple Valley intensity use to a low-intensity use by incorporating Vision for General Development of residential neighborhoods. To that end, the City uses of moderate intensity in between. Typical zon- aims to minimize land use conflicts through appli- The overall goal of the City is to guide the use of ing arrangements attempt to minimize the interface cation of the zoning ordinance and buffering poli- land to realize the vision for Apple Valley. The between high-intensity and low-intensity uses by cies. Buffering techniques are Apple Valley's pri- goals and policies in this section describe the land promoting a gradual transition in intensity across an mary strategy for smoothing land use transitions. use objectives of Apple Valley, which aim to meet urban transect. An idealized arrangement is as fol- the needs and desires of all members of the corn- The City uses buffers to separate incompatible lows: munity. Land Use element of the Compre- land uses or portions of land uses that have the y p Industrial/commercial high-density residen- hensive Plan promotes a development pattern potential to negatively impact adjacent properties tial 4 medium density 4 low density that can be sustained over time, makes the best and/or neighborhoods. This arrangement has several benefits: use of available resources, and maximizes the Buffers also: ability of each use to meet its intended function, • • Protects homeowners' property invest- Define neighborhood convenience centers ments. Most Apple Valley homeowners live in such as the provision of recreational, social, envi- ronmental, or economic services. • Provide open space in higher-density residen- low-density, single-family neighborhoods. tial developments • Protects commercial and industrial uses. Apple Valley is a place with outstanding quail- • Introduce strategic design features into Some commercial and industrial areas lose ty of life. We must wisely use the natural, developments their ability to function properly if they are en- economic, and human resources needed to • Reinforce neighborhood identity croached by low-intensity uses. create this quality of life. We seek to provide Designed buffer treatments utilize a variety of • Links high-density residential develop- the resources required to maintain and en- natural and structural design elements to reduce ments to jobs, retail, and services. Linking hance this quality of life for generations. In the effect of noise, light, traffic, or mismatched employees, workers, and consumers creates doing so, Apple Valley aspires to be sustain- aesthetics on residential properties. Landscaping mutually beneficial relationships for busi- able. ® elements, berms, distance, fencing, and site and nesses for all three groups. In this way, local regulatory policies recognize the practical building orientation are all techniques that help to needs of the private market. General Planning Strategies buffer uses. • Aids transportation goals. The general ar- The City uses zoning and buffering techniques to In cases where new development or redevelop- rangement described above is seamlessly in- guide all parcels toward their highest land use and ment is proposed that may negatively impact ex- tegrated with the transportation plan through maintain the integrity of distinctive uses. isting uses, the City may require noise, traffic, the roadway functional classification system. shadow and similar studies to evaluate the extent High density/intensity uses are located along Zoning and Buffering Concepts of the expected impacts and the mitigation arterials and major collectors. Low intensity An important objective of city planning in Apple measures needed to reduce those impacts. uses are located on minor collectors and local Valley is to preserve the vitality and cohesiveness Another type of buffer is a "use" buffer. A "use" buffer acts to moderate the transition from a high- CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Land Use 4-3 Apple streets. In addition, concentrating residential enduring quality of development sought by the Natural Resources and employment densities along key transit- City and achieve other objectives of this Plan. ways promotes ridership for regional Bus The natural environment makes a significant con- Rapid Transit (BRT) and the municipal transit Employment Areas tribution to an attractive community image and system. quality of life. A mature urban forest dissipates Thriving, well-balanced communities require plen- heat and provides shade from the sun. Wetlands General Community Design Standards tiful employment opportunities. Two key objectives provide habitat for waterfowl and filter storm water of the Land Use Plan are to provide sufficient acre- The City uses this Plan, design policies, and other runoff. The value of these and other natural fea- age for employers and connect more Apple Valley land use regulations to create desirable environ- tures is not easily quantified. It is important that residents to jobs within the City. The City targets ments for its residents to live, work, and play, and significant natural features be preserved when- household supporting employment (i.e., jobs that sustain high-quality development. The City uses ever possible, and that artificial alternatives which pay above the area median income). The Fischer general design standards to establish minimum perform a similar ecosystem service are con- Sand and Gravel Mining Area has been guided for requirements for site design, exterior architectural structed when necessary. Federal regulatory poli- this purpose since the 2030 Comprehensive Plan form and scale, and landscaping in keydevelop- cy protects valuable natural features at a high p g Update. ment areas, including major road corridors and level, but the City of Apple Valley has also taken larger parcels with few natural amenities. Desirable uses in higher-wage employment areas steps to protect fragile resources. should consist of office, office-showroom, ser- Municipal design guidelines consider the following vices, medical, health care, research and devel- aspects of development: opment, and forms of light industrial land use that • Site grading produce minimal noise, odor, or other forms of • Architectural building materials pollution. Undesirable uses are those that have Building orientation high levels of noise, traffic congestion, odor, dust, • vibration, lighting, and unmitigated contamination. • Landscaping Retail uses should be limited to 25% at the very • Parking maximum of the overall employment area and • Lighting should be strategically guided to support the pri- • Property access mary employment use. Employment areas should have strong connectivity to the Downtown, resi- • Internal traffic circulation dential neighborhoods, and transit facilities. The • Pedestrian and bicycle facilities City will adopt policies to guide the use of finan- • Transit amenities cial programs and land use controls to attract and Innovative subdivision and development design expand businesses that achieve these objectives. techniques will be encouraged if they produce the CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Land Use 4-4 Apple„ Focus Areas In addition to the Fischer Sand and Aggregate In 2040, Downtown and Orchard Place will reclamation project, infill development will contin- In the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, two locations ue in the adjacent Cobblestone Lake area, locat- feature a mixture of residential, commercial, receive significant attention. These areas include and employment uses; a connected grid of ed east of Pilot Knob Road. This Planned Devel- the Fischer Mine Area,which will become Orchard "great area is nearing buildout, with construction great streets"; and suburban-intensive trans- Place, and Downtown. Figure 4.1 depicts these it-supportive density, continuing in 2017. Remaining vacant parcels are areas, which are adjacent to each other. Down- planned for multifamily residentialdevelopment. town is and will remain Apple Valley's commercial center, while the focus of Orchard place is on Fischer Sand and Aggregate Mining high-quality employment. While these areas have Area and Adjacent Infill different opportunities and constraints for rede- Figure 4.2 shows the concept plan for the Fischer velopment, development should integrate a mix- Sand and Gravel Mining Area. The master plan, ture of compatible land uses, a connected grid of called Orchard Place, designates 262 acres for "great streets", and a transit-supportive density. A nonresidential, employment-based use. The 2030 preliminary step to facilitate this transition is to Land Use Plan guided most of this acreage as extend the existing Ring Route east through Or- Mixed Business Campus. The area is intended to chard Place, as depicted in Figure 4.1. The fol- be a high quality setting for general office, corpo- lowing sections describe Orchard Place, Down- rate office, research and development, light man- town, the Ring Route, and other aspects of Apple ufacturing, and office showroom. The City also Valley's focus areas in more detail. has a strong desire to attract health facilities with related offices and clinics to this location given market support for this use. The Mixed-Business Campus District provides flexibility for a variety of business/industry clus- ters. As of 2017, the Orchard Place site plan il- lustrates the location of each cluster, and iden- tifies a specific set of land use envisioned for each cluster. The plan sets clear goals for den- sity and floor area ratios (FAR), which establish general parameters to achieve the desired de- velopment. FAR requirements encourage a denser development pattern. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Land Use 4-5 Apple„ Figure 4.2 - Orchard Place Concept CONCEPTUAL LAND USE DIAGRAM - -- -• COINTY ROAD 42 '�"'_�7t. Density or FA.R. A B CEMETERY Acreage Conceptual Land Uses Goals Ran Goals a 9° l'• A -` A 26.6 010ce 0.2510 0.35 __. 1 ,.. O -r. Hotel 0.35 to 0.50 -- - 1 ` _ a�� !lTl::: � 018to030HQMD O "- - - B 70 -1 0.18 to 0.30 ' ' C 29.5 Once 0.25 to 0.35 ' Plea Greenspece I n Hotel 0.35 to 0.50 Green 1 i r © J AMENITY - _ 1 - Medical 02510 0.40 rj i FEATURES 1 EATUR v D 14.5 Commercial Retail 0.18 to 0.30 �i FEATURES �I Office 0.250.25 to 0.35 _153RD ST - -- . T`:• 0.2510 0.40 • BHP I frr �' ° E 2.8 Multi-Family Residential 4.0 to 30.0 t O 1 H - Senior Housing 12.0 to 30.0 1 F 60.6 Office 0 1 O0.25b0.35 1 1 Industrial 0.30 to 0.45 f¢ 1 1 i 5. ...-_ Medical 0.25 to 0.40 ,L C •,. _....____________ Y. • _•-••.�__. 1 PKWYr 14 - - -r1i G 70.1 Medical 0.25 to 0.40 Corporate Campus 0.25 to 0.35 • _-..---...-_-.- EASEMENT Office 0.25 to 0.35 , _ _ __--_ ` - - -- - - - _ Industrial 0.30 to0.45 1 ! - •' - Commercial Retail 0.18 to 0.30 Lu - •, 1 AMENITY • TARGET ' Q y ]� H 12.9 Commercial Retail 0.18 to 0.30 '•-0. O w Office025to0.35 1 0 Hotel 0.3510 0.50 _ - 1- 0 - r J Medical 0.25100.40 Is i7 � f.` 1 re iY, I 27.4 Single-family Residential 3.0 to4.0 I • 1 y. Ike ^ f Q I z ^ _ I V �;. Srurrpeu J 16.6 Single-Family Residential 3.0 to 4.0 n �Z ` I. i K 24 4 Residential 4 0 o 30.0 / Multi-Family sid b t I .-'� ^l '. Senior Housing 12.o a 30.0 r L 30.7 Commercial Retail 0.18 W 0.30 _ Office 0.25 to 0.35 ram• 1 EIdWn1 157t1,STREET Medical 025 to 0.40 -- "' a ' • - 1 1._ - --. { Underpws-_ - TRANSIT •- C I _ STATION ' QUARRY- `i` ""•' ; POINT PARK -Exiad TOTALS •,- - _ Underpass Non-Residential Uses 251.9 Acres EXISTING EXIST- Residential Uses 71.2 Acres -- • wr FEuRE R . STURMWATER FEATURE Amenity Features 35 Acres r ACCESS KEY rI Full Access 1: M i• la S; ly 3/4 Access 104 Right-in/Right-out Only Creek Greenway Kimley »Horn O xc,ll.utl> ORCHARD PLACE APPLE VALLEY, MN North C ) Orchard Place Trail PLACE AUGUST 2017 �- u ion ion 400ON CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Land Use 4-6 AppValley Economic Development Potential West/155th Parkway at a roundabout. These two Downtown streets provide the four primary access points to Or- The Metropolitan Council projects that Apple chard Place. They are each spaced approximately Downtown Apple Valley is located at the commercial Valley will support 17,100 jobs by 2040, an in- 1/2 mile from other signalized intersections. As the crossroads of Cedar Avenue (CSAH 23/TH 77) and crease of 2,821 from the 2010 Census figure. City looks to develop its east-west transit connection County Road 42. It contains a cluster of large retail However, the Economic Development Authority along County Road 42, a future transit station is en- uses and some smaller offices and services, as well has set a goal of reaching 19,000 jobs. The visioned at the intersection of County Road 42 and as key institutions (City Municipal Center), high- City recognizes a significant opportunity to cre- Johnny Cake Ridge Road, at the north entrance to density apartments, and some newer mixed-use de- ate high-quality jobs and retain local labor, giv- the Orchard Place site. The City will engage the velopment. Having developed largely during the en that most residents currently work in other MTVA to develop future transit services. 1970s and 1980s, Downtown was and continues to jurisdictions. With its emphasis on employ- be primarily auto-oriented. The quadrants surround- Additional minor accesses are spaced at intervals of ing Cedar Avenue and County Road 42 consist of ment-based uses, Orchard Place will substan- ,/8 mile to '/4 mile around the perimeter of the site. tially contribute toward this goal. Consistent super-blocks containing big-box stores and large ar- The 153rd Street West/155th Parkway route is a vital eas of surface parking. The scope of Downtown with the keys identified as part of Apple Valley's con- east-west connection to Downtown. This road is a vision, this employment-focused area will help tinues to evolve in form, use, and density. With the planned extension of the Ring Route. A gasline development of Central Village and the Fischer Mar- provide a diversity of living-wage jobs and cre- easement parallels the road to the south. An internal ate opportunities for the City's residents to ketplace, Downtown has expanded to the east. The circulator route complements the primary highlighted Downtown Core on Figure 4.1 contains work closer to home. The Mixed Business Cam- north/south and east/west routes. pus land use category is intended to accom- approximately 600 acres. modate a mix of approximately 55% to 65% of- Environmental and Recreational Amenities One of the keys of this plan is a successful down- fice ('/3 of which would be targeted for health Three large ponds provide on-site storm water man- town. Apple Valley envisions a unique, identifiable, and medical related facilities), 10% to 20% light agement and recreational amenities. The ponds are and thriving downtown. The building blocks are in industry/manufacturing, and 10% office show- a practical use for the site, acting to counteract the place. Downtown is located adjacent to one of the room or office warehouse. Because the area effects of impervious surface runoff and reducing the busiest at-grade intersections in the state. It is also includes other mixed uses, high-density amount of fill that is needed for development. Apple served by the METRO Red Line Bus Rapid Transit housing and incidental retail and service, uses Valley's bedrock geology provides natural storm wa- (BRT) service, which connects riders to the central could also be considered to a limited extent. ter filtration. metropolitan region and other destinations. In 1990, Transportation Network The ponds are connected through an internal trail the City invested in a series of road, sidewalk, and system, three bridges, and two plaza/greenspace landscape improvements called the Ring Route; The Orchard Place plan is centered around two helping to further establish Downtown's identity and internal collector roads, JohnnyCake Ridgeareas. One grade-separated trail connection is illus- improve access to the area. There are large areas of Road and 153rd Street West/155th Parkway. trated across 153rd Street, in the northwest quad- Johnny Cake Ridge Road bisects the site from rant of the site. Other midblock trail crossings should north to south, intersecting with 153rd Street be explored. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Land Use 4-7 Apple. surface parking which could be redeveloped for series of self-contained village plans for each This link is vital to connect the Downtown and other uses. While Apple Valley will never have a quadrant of the Cedar Avenue/County Road greater Apple Valley with the dense concen- traditional downtown, the evolving character of 42 intersection. tration of jobs that are anticipated for Orchard downtown suggests that there will continue to be • Rivers need bridges. Cornejo Consulting and Place, existing employment near 147th Street opportunities for the community to establish a LHB Architects, in their 2008 study, Transit- West, and the other amenities described unique sense of place by creating an environ- Oriented Land Use Planning and Develop- above. This plan envisions a future regional ment that is more walkable and engaging. ment Evaluation put forward conceptual im- transit route on County Road 42, with a con- provements for the intersection of Cedar Av ceptual transit station located at Johnny Cake A series of factors will shape the future of Down- Ridge Road. enue and County Road 42. One proposal en- town: visions a grade-separated plaza or "lid" over • Commercial development continues in sur- • Big-box retail users are distributed through- the intersection (See Figure 4.3). Any im- rounding communities. These commercial ar- out the area. Some of these sites will change provements to provide cross-connections eas compete with the market for Downtown hands between now and 2040, perhaps many across Cedar Avenue faces the complex task Apple Valley as a regional shopping destina- times. Others may experience site transfor- of balancing the implications for traffic on tion. Apple Valley will need to focus on down- mations, including reduced store footprints, Cedar Avenue and County Road 42, transit town land uses, design features, and other adaptive reuse, or infill development as the service, pedestrian and bicycle safety and opportunities that will differentiate Downtown retail market adapts to changing consumer mobility, and impacts to adjacent land devel- from other regional communities. preferences. opment. If these or similar opportunities arise Row 4.3—CencepinalCedarAvenueLid • The existing travel grid consists of a series of in the plan horizon, the City will work proac- Ilm - ,77^ �1._ "superblocks" — long, uninterrupted routes tively with Dakota County to achieve the best r `• 6.� s�� F.. -4 possible results from these improvements. . V +' designed almost exclusivelyfor vehicles. As p 9f Y.• iIlk redevelopment opportunities arise, some of • The METRO Red Line bus rapid transit(BRT) P. _'p' - — vi :'' . ■ p pp i tip ' - ■ these superblocks may be broken up to im- service has been extended along the Cedar `— ,iv,_ .' - w prove roadway connectivity and accessibility Avenue Corridor.The Red Line improvements i �; 1/} •}� for other modes. will alter the form and function of Downtown - ' f _A • Cedar Avenue may be viewed as a river.That and may create new development opportuni- e. is, its function is to convey large volumes of ties in Downtown. Access to BRT can be a Source:LHBArchitects continuous traffic flow.As a"river,"the road ef- catalyst for commercial, office, and housing Ring Route fectively severs the east and west portions of development. The growth of regional BRT Apple Valley.A previous planning effort by the service expands the convenience and oppor- The Downtown of Apple Valley is an evolving part American Institute of Architects recognized tunity for traveling between Apple Valley and of the community. In 1990, the City built distinctive that Cedar Avenue as constructed prohibits a other metro-area destinations for employ- streetscape improvements that became known as unified Downtown plan, and recommended a ment, shopping, and other needs. the Ring Route (See Figure 4.1). These improve- • County Road 42 as an east-west transit link. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Land Use 4-8 Apple ments help to define an identity and character for ..' '' Central Village District the Downtown area. The Ring Route also serves ';�� W Or.P: j ,: r The Downtown focus area contains the Central to provide vehicle access to the Downtown apart 4 ' � 5 , • .s, •t' - .1 P .'. . Village, the 60-acre area surrounding the inter from the primary arterials, and separates the pri- 411,, °^ ''�*- t ' / s-a, .. ', w V ;"� section of Galaxie Avenue and 153rd Street West. w '� t x `Ylr,. mary shopping and service area of the City from s ' . . a� _ { ' the surrounding neighborhoods. The original Ring , �� -ri,. ' ' This area includes the Shops on Galaxie, Vivo ,_. Kitchen, Grand Stay Hotel, RE/MAX office build- Route circles 147th Street West, Galaxie Avenue, 153rd Street West, and Pennock Avenue. The ` Au. ing, Legacy Townhomes, Seasons at Apple Valley, Central Village is located within this area, with a :: ..' ' \. ,--- :• Haralson Apartments, Remington Apartments, undeveloped parcels remaining. ___, Ni,''''''': and Parkside Village Gabella. Kelley Park, a pop- few ular community park and significant neighbor- Apple Valley's core commercial district has shift- Distinctive streetscape improvements on the Ring Route help de hood amenity, hosts Music in Kelley Park through- fineed to the east with the development of the Fisch- the Downtown area. p out the summer and Oktoberfest in the fall. er Marketplace and Central Village. Beyond, the Sense of Place Parkside Village Galante is currently under con- Fischer Mine Area contains more than 400 acres, struction and a mixed-use senior cooperative which will be redeveloped and integrated into the The results of a public survey conducted in early building with nearby restaurants, retail and office downtown fabric. The Ring Route should be ex- 2017 indicates that there is strong support for in- buildings are expected to be under construction tended through Orchard Place in or- der to con- vestments in and redevelopment of Downtown soon. Only a few lots remain for residential and nect to the future employment area and draw that continue to promote a unique sense of place. mixed-use commercial development in the area. from adjacent multifamily developments. A sense of place arises from utility, activity, and The vision for the Central Village was to create an To extend the RingRoute and developopportuni- careful design. The City can use many policy, pp area with a unique sense of place by offering a ties alongitsperimeter, the Citywill incorporate economic, and design strategies to achieve its P design alternative to the rest of the Downtown: similar design and amenities to ensure a con- Downtown objectives. g multiple story buildings, with a mix of commercial, sistent feel. The focus in this area will be on em- Survey participants indicated that dining and re- retail and residential uses placed closer to the ployment-based land uses — mixed office, medi- tail variety were needed in Apple Valley. Signifi- street in a compact, pedestrian-oriented form. cal, and industrial, including the Mixed Business cant mention was also made by the public for a Vertical mixed use with commercial offices and re- Campus in Orchard Place — with ancillary retail downtown or focal point as something needed in tail on the first floor and residential housing on the and residential. Developing the intensity of adja- Apple Valley. As an implementation action, the upper stories was proposed. The Central Village cent land uses along 147th Street and 153rd community may develop a set of Downtown De- has been shaped over time by market realities and Street will encourage the use of these routes as sign Guidelines to help distinguish the character right-sized for a suburban setting. Full build out of relievers for traffic on County Road 42. of the Downtown development. the area was slowed by the recession and the market was slow to accept the mixed-use-within- a-building development form. However, as more CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Land Use 4-9 AppValley of the residential developments are completed, the area is becoming the vibrant and active area that was envisioned. The area has accomplished its mixed-use vision, an energetic, sustainable and active place containing a variety of housing „_ �, types, neighborhood commercial uses, live/work -- units, and meaningful green spaces. I II 11( II ■■ I �� yThe City has installed on-street parking and , �l �� ,, 0 ox r ' ._.. v, * !`streetscaping improvements that will allow drivers �� - _. - 4 ✓ 'to ark in the Central Villa a area and walk the 1 , 4I ° i In4 1 . . -•,, - fiii I d ;i . �. district. To maximize dining and retail variety op- -� ;; _ portunities in this area, the existing street im- .0.- - provements can be taken advantage of through the promotion of ground-floor commercial retail . �.,_ development on vacant land. To further promote the Central Village as a focal point, new devel- The shops on Galaxie. opment should be built to the sidewalk to enhance and others, the development trend has shifted pedestrian interaction with the street and to make Mixed Use toward horizontal mixed-use throughout the sub- the area unique. urban communities of the region. Likewise, Apple The City desires more mixed-use development in Valley encourages horizontal mixed use. Howev- The City can take positive design concepts from Downtown. Uses could be mixed horizontally in er, horizontal mixed use is only effective when the Central Village and build on them throughout building divisions or in separate buildings located designed as part of a cohesive site plan that con- the Downtown. As a first step, the City will adopt close together, or they could be mixed vertically siders both vehicular and active modes of trans- and implement a series of Downtown Design by floors within a single structure. Developers in portation; well connected both internally and ex- Guidelines. the Twin Cities metro have begun to gravitate from ternally from the entire site. vertical mixed-use, which poses distinct chal- lenges. For example, a development is typically Transit Supportive Development only as successful as the ground-floor use. A de- Apple Valley envisions an inclusive, accessible velopment built on ground-floor retail will suffer if Downtown that welcomes and engages citizens the retail businesses suffer or are forced to va- of all ages and abilities and supports alternative cate. Some ground-floor uses, such as restau- travel modes in addition to private automobiles. rants, may also create bothersome effects (noise, odor)for the residents above. For these reasons CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Land Use 4-10 Apple. This includes transit, walking, and bicycling, as Density Expectations few areas within the transit sheds, which remain well and targeted improvements that support the to be developed. Therefore, Apple Valley chose to The focus on multimodal accessibility in the corn- Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Two cord- identify a transit supportive area focused around prehensive plan reflects the reality of regional dors,Cedar Avenue and County Road 42,form the Downtown and Orchard Place. This area encom- transportation opportunities and constraints. As backbone of Downtown. The BRT improvements passes most of the new development, which is noted in the Metropolitan Council's 2040 Trans- on Cedar Avenue should be leveraged and sup- planned for the City. It emphasizes the desire to portation Policy Plan, it is not possible to continue ported by complementary land use planning and increase jobs or housing density and enhance to expand highway capacity in a sustainable way, economic development initiatives. The Compre- multi- modal connections to and from the Red given the Twin Cities' expanding footprint and hensive Plan envisions the expansion of regional Line. Several areas are planned for High Density funding limitations. Therefore, the regional trans- transit to County Road 42, which already supports Residential (12-40 units per acre) and Suburban portation plan is shifting toward a strategy of a local bus route. An expanded transit system on Intensive High Density(24-48 units per acre). travel demand management (TDM) versus high- County Road 42 would serve new development in The transit supportive capacity improvements. Part of TDM in- area is intended to describe Orchard Place, strengthen the east-west link be- walkable distances from Apple Valley's the application of transit-oriented growth pp primary y tween Downtown and the developing employment ment transit routes. However, the existingdevelop strategies. The Metropolitan Council has set re- p areas, and alleviate some traffic on County Road and streetpatterns discouragepedestrian activity 42, offsetting some of the targeted density in- quirements for overall density within transit corri- g crease in this area. Typically, this type of integrat- dors, as well as for residential density that should (e.g., downtown superblocks). Through targeted be considered in order to achieve the overall planning and design interventions, the City can ed approach to developing public transit corridors better encourage walkingand bicycling within density requirements. The overall density expec- g Y g and adjacent properties is called transit-oriented the transit supportive helping transit users tation is 10 units per acre within a 1/2-mile radius pp area, p g development (TOD). As a suburban community, 9 of the Red Line BRT stations. As a guideline, the bridge the "first and last mile" connection on their Apple Valley wishes to pursue TOD at a subur- commutes. average density for new development should be ban-intensive scale. This term reflects the City's 20 units per acre or higher within the 1/2 mile desire to become denser in key locations served by transit, while acknowledging the realities of its transit shed. Transit-oriented development in Apple Valley suburban character. Transit Supportive Area should be "suburban-intensive"— density will Figure 4.4 shows the transit sheds for Apple Val- increase in targeted locations, but the sub- Improving multimodal accessibility reinforces ley, including the areas contained within 1/2 mile of urban character of the community will be re- sustainability and resiliency goals by reducing the METRO Red Line BRT corridor and 1/4 mile of tained overall. vehicle miles traveled and diversifying travel three proposed arterial bus routes. (See Trans- options for commuting and shopping. ® portation, Chapter 8.) The figure also shows all of the City's planned development, highlighting the higher-density residential areas. Note that out- side of Downtown and Orchard Place, there are CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Land Use 4-11 Apple„ Figure 4.4 -Transit Supportive Area `��� 14lllllllli�•y .- PI EAGAN Transit Features i Pik -ittMETRO Red Line 0nih4 AO A 11 5 Q� I Ito, I 125TH$T im � Proposed Arterial Transit A Ili 1 ( Red Line Extension \� 1wimp"' > �r� �i �� 1 MVTA Stops of , 11 C ' �r aVI • Red Line Stationl1 Proposed Transit Station70 dthr Q Park and Ride ��. itiltiotiri,. . i �MVTA Routes , ii L !� t*,sit Supportive AreaiOdIIIL it Shd * Nil AM Planned Development pp' r , �� 1 lairwn High Density Residential • ;lai Suburban Intensive High Density _ r ,1 ' — • y ��r1110 . ,_ o 9j Mixed Use vw-mgraltisw ` 1. ' I��1Mixed Business Campus _- 11• 1 �.-' mwewrompi `, • 4 ,��_��� it •��.OTH STy _ Other ��1i, , �m^ ".T4ihill. � �� 1� ii f Transit sheds extend 1/2 mile from the ■ S'i � � � � '�� �• Apple Valley's proposed arterial bus routes. 0 0.5 1 IR WHITNYD� O , s• rV� a\t�v tom Miles �f en no �� �1�'�1 1,--1�- � — .111 / ft„..110100, ifiLkeferij ittlemik 74, 1 i' ` „am ...104,r, 4* wow , J-1.,_, ...r. EV -r= .,:4- -- CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update s::• Land Use 4-12 Apple Land Use Objectives • Increase overall density, with the highest acre for the entire area. density located within '/ mile of the METRO Walkability Within Downtown, Orchard Place, and the transit Red Line and high frequency transit service supportive area, the current development pat- (approximately 10-minute walk) A key goal is improving walkability and pedestrian tern could change significantly by 2040. In con- activity. Both the public survey for this plan and • Support a system of arterials, local streets, trast to residential development, job-related land sidewalks, and trails that distributes traffic previous survey efforts described the difficulty of uses have a tendency to change frequently. Over more broadly and improves opportunities to navigating Apple Valley without a car. A sense of the 20-year horizon of this Comprehensive Plan, walk and bike. place is difficult to absorb from the automobile. many commercial properties may become struc- Pedestrian activity leads to social interaction and • Improve parking efficiency by exploring turally, functionally, and/or economically obsolete; community health benefits, and has been shown shared parking opportunities, minimum park- opening the door to redevelopment. Land use ing requirements, and other schemes. to increase retail sales receipts in many downtown policies in this area will be directed to support environments. stable business, target commercial redevelop- The roads and businesses in downtown require a ment opportunities, infill vacant parcels, and in- Housing should be built at densities of at least 40 units peracre in the Transit SupportiveArea. safe and convenient environment for drivers and crease residential densities. Some properties pedestrians. Within this environment, the City is have been vacant or underperforming for some Today,Apple Valley's zoning code requires a mini- committed to examining and implementing tech- time. Some of these commercial sites may find niques to make downtown a place that is safe and new life un- der a different owner or strategic re- mum of 12 units per acre for high-density residen- tial development. However, recent multiple family attractive for pedestrians and bicyclists and where development. As available infill opportunities are vehicle access makes good business sense. exhausted, the healthy market will ultimately en- residential developments have largely exceeded courage revitalization of these areas. 40 units per acre, especially in Downtown. Rec- Walkable environments are visually stimulating, ognizing this trend, the City has established a new higher-density, and tend to have shorter block The Downtown Focus Area supports a mix of hous- residential land use category called "Suburban In- lengths. Pedestrians will always take the shortest ing, commercial, and job generating uses. Apple tensive High Density" (SIHD) which recognizes route and short blocks provide more possible Valley supports the following objectives for sub- the densities in the Central Village Area that have routes for them to use. The current configuration urban-intensive, transit-oriented development: already been approved. The SIHD is proposed to of superblocks in Downtown is a deterrent to pe- • Support job growth where concentrations ex- have a density ranging from 24 to 48 units per destrians and bicyclists. Although parking lots are ist and along regional highway nodes. acre, which better reflects the existing develop- technically navigable on foot, they are neither in- • Provide a complementary mix of land uses to ment pattern. The SIHD will help the City to be viting nor particularly safe for extended pedestrian balance housing, employment, service, and recognized for the already approved higher den- travel. To fabricate a more walkable environment, retail needs. sity developments. This, in turn, will help the City the Downtown street grid could be enhanced by • Locate medium-to-high density housing at a to achieve its affordability goals. Ultimately, using adding additional linkages for vehicles and pe- variety of price points. this tool, the City is confident it will meet the goal destrians when redevelopment opportunities of achieving an average density of 10 units per present themselves. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Land Use 4-13 AppValley Figure 4.5 depicts a concept for breaking up the Fare 4.5-Conceptual Downtown Travel Connections superblocks in the four quadrants of the Down- 16 town core by overlaying a new travel grid and en- hancing pedestrian access at the Downtown pe- riphery. The new interior streets, shown in purple, 147TH ET'A' are conceptual only. Some of them would require { more planning than others. Some might not be #._ _i. • i ) new "streets" so much as enhancements of exist- i ing parking areas that provide more definition for o 2 COUNTY FOJ32 159TH 3T W 4 "� vehicle or pedestrian circulation. d rr---- . Increasing the density of jobs and households in LEGEND i 1 i W --_t ■ Downtown will promote walkability by increasing Existing Ring Route I 4.4,, L . , the percentage of internal trips (trips that have — Existing VehiueRoule i 1 i w ix f i both origination and destination in the Downtown —_. Poten4al Vehicular Cannecaan , ' / --„`-., Focus Area/travel analysis zone). 133ROSTh' 4r." Po.enCal Pedestrian CannecBon • inTransit Station � igPark and Ride Raimi or•K P Cedar Avenue Corridor nizes that TOD goals must be practical in scale and intensity—they must be "suburban-intensive." The METRO Red Line bus rapid transit (BRT) County Road 42 Corridor has three stops in Apple Valley: the main transit station at 155th Street, and two walk-up stations County Road 42/150th Street is identified as a po- at 147th Street and 140th Street. The extension tential east/west regional transit route. This transit of BRT to Apple Valley via the Red Line has al- route would be viewed as a supporting route for ready triggered land use changes along the Ce- the Cedar Avenue Red Line, and is crucial for dar Avenue Corridor. This transit investment can linking the primary future employment area with leverage future transit-oriented development. As Downtown and fully integrating the Orchard Place a suburban community, Apple Valley recog- Plan into the existing urban fabric. The Cityenvi- CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Land Use 4-14 AppValley sions a future transit station at the intersection opportunities. Clearly, Apple Valley's leaders 40 units per acre. While residential is not in- of Johnny Cake Ridge Road and County Road and its residents have a common interest in tended to be the primary use in Downtown or 42. Apple Valley will engage with neighboring preserving the qualities that make the commu- Orchard Place, most of the infill residential op- jurisdictions, including Dakota County, as well nity great. portunities identified in the future land use plan as the MVTA to expand transit services within Any time there are opportunities for develop- are planned for similar densities. Increasing this corridor that support development objec- ment, redevelopment, or retrofits there are op- density is not just a goal of suburban retrofits, tives for Orchard Place. portunities to improve sustainability. Therefore, but usually a prerequisite — adding density generates the return on investment that is Transit Station Planning Nodes the two focus areas discussed previously — Or- needed for redevelopment to be viable. chard Place and Downtown — represent the • There are three transit stations located in the largest opportunities to address sustainability Encourage reduction/retrofits of underper- forming paved surfaces. In Apple Valley's Cedar Avenue corridor, and a conceptual future issues through planning and development. Downtown, a substantial amount of paved sur- transit station has been identified at County Some of the most significant opportunities to face is used for parking. Some of this space Road 42 and Johnny Cake Ridge Road. These practice sustainable design will come through could be put to better use. Asphalt is an under- represent nodal opportunities to encourage adaptive reuse and redevelopment. Land use performing use — it allows rainwater to absorb transit-supportive land use and discourage us- planning can guide sustainability in numerous oil, fertilizer, and other chemicals before mak- es that obstruct TOD objectives. As redevelop- ways: ing its way into the drinking supply; it radiates ment opportunities arise, the following uses will • Increase density in key planning areas. heat; and it represents an opportunity cost, be encouraged: generating no tax revenue of its own. Apple Apple Valley has a growing population, limited • Multifamily housing and small-lot residential growth area, and no ability to expand. There- Valley can reduce the amount of paved surface units fore, it will become denser.The key to land use by adjusting its expectations for new develop- • Hotels planning will be to target this density in key ment and by encouraging adaptive reuse for existing development. Various permeable pav- Commercial Office Space areas and limit the negative impacts of densi- • ers can be encouraged as a more sustainable fication. Increased density will enable Apple • Health care clinics and medical offices Valley to become more sustainable on several alternative to asphalt. • • Retail services and restaurants fronts. Higher densities encourage walking, Use best landscaping practices to improve bicycling, and transit ridership. Increasing water cycling. The application of landscaping Sustainable Community 0 density by developing successful multi-story techniques for stormwater management, such office, multi-family, and mixed-use structures as rain gardens and bioswales, can offset In the 2040 vision for Apple Valley, sustainability some of the effects of impermeable pavement is one of the keys. The CommunityContext improves energy efficiency by reducing per y capita demand. Density increases the retail described above. Apple Valley has used these chapter recognizes the City's numerous customer base that local businesses need to techniques effectively in the past. Extending achievements in sustainability. Meanwhile, the thrive. Apple Valley has recently developed their application in Downtown will improve Comprehensive Planning process encouraged many successful multi-family projects around drainage and enhance the appeal to the built a group of like-minded citizens to discuss other CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Land Use 4-15 Apple„ lic and private sectors. The City will eval- by engaging with the Dakota County Historical environment. Raingardens should be appropriately uate its use of land use controls to protect Society and other groups. When there are oppor- located and designed to produce best effects. access to solar and encourage solar in- tunities to protect valued historical and cultural • Increase local and regional transit ridership. stallation by residents. Likewise, the City assets within Apple Valley, the City will partner The extension of the Red Line to Apple Valley has will encourage electric vehicles by provid- withsufficient plug-in locations. Electric the Historical Society to sponsor planning opened new development opportunities in the Ce- ing p g efforts and secure funding. dar Avenue transitway. Direct transit service can vehicles could be incorporated as part of increase property values, which, in some cases, a broader sustainable transportation may facilitate redevelopment. Apple Valley can sup- strategy — for example, by developing a port regional ridership by addressing the "last-mile" circulator between the Red Line and the problem and improving access to the Red Line. Minnesota Zoo. Adaptive reuse and re- One strategy is to improve pedestrian connectivity development will provide additional op- and safety in Downtown and enhance pedestrian portunities to improve energy efficiency. crossings at Cedar Avenue. Another is to provide a Renewable energy potential should al- circulator from the Red Line to the Minnesota Zoo. ways be evaluated for redevelopment Further, the City will extend the Ring Route, im- projects. The Great Plains Institute per- proving access between Downtown and surround- formed an assessment of the local ener- ing neighborhoods. Finally, both the City and Dako- gy system, which will be used to develop to County are engaged in discussions about en- more specific energy goals. This as- hancing east-west transit service on County Road sessment is appended by reference, and 42. This connection would be an integral component is available from the City upon request. of Orchard Place. With a strong transit network in Historic Resource Protection place, more opportunities will arise for suburban- intensive TOD, particularly within the Accessibility Apple Valley values the cultural and historical Focus Area. With a focus on transit and supportive resources which are part of its heritage. We development, Apple Valley will endeavor to reduce support the mission of the Dakota County His- its carbon footprint. torical Society, which works to preserve, com- • Develop renewable energy systems. The biggest memorate, and interpret the historical legacy of impact Apple Valley can make to reduce its car- the county. The Historical Society has com- bon footprint is to develop its renewable energy memorated one site in Apple Valley, the Leba- systems. The State of Minnesota has set a goal of non Cemetery, which dates to 1863 and con- 50% renewable energy by 2030. This initiative tains the remains of many early settlers. The encourages competition in the private sector and cemetery was expanded in 2001. Apple Valley between communities in their efforts to become will continue to support efforts to preserve and more sustainable. There are numerous opportuni- promote historical sites and cultural features, ties to develop renewables in Apple Valley's pub- CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Land Use 4-16 Apple„ 2040 Land Use Plan Figure 4.7 highlights areas where the 2040 land Table 4.1 Future Land Use Categories use designation has changed from the 2030 plan. The 2040 Land Use Map identifies a future land Land Use Acres %Total Most of the highlighted areas are undeveloped. use for every parcel in Apple Valley. Significant Other highlighted areas are currently developed, Low Density Residential 4,586 41.0% new development and redevelopment is antici- but the land use was reclassified to better reflect Medium Density Residential 560 5.1% pated to occur in the focus areas described in the existing densities and improve consistency with preceding text. However, the exact location and High Density Residential 291 2.6% zoning. In these cases, it is important to note that orientation of that development is not presently the existingland use is changing in name only. Suburban Intensive High 37 < 1.0% known. Blocks and parcels may change as retail- For g gDensity For example, a new category was created to dif- ers come and go. Mobile Home Park 108 1.0% ferentiate manufactured housing from low-den- Figure 4.6 shows the land use plan for 2040. Ta- sity residential. Also, note that the map does not Commercial 540 4.8% ble 4.1 provides the total acreage for each use. display the difference between existing land use Mixed Use 5 < 1.0% Each land use category is described in the text and future land use.There are some undeveloped Industrial 252 I 2.2% beginning on page 4-23. areas where the future land use designation has Mixed Business Campus 164 1.5% not changed from the previous plan. These are Public/Institutional 488 4.4% not highlighted on the map. Thus, Figure 4.7 does not accurately show the capacity for growth. See Park and Open Space 1,786 16.0% Figure 4.8, Development Phasing, to get a sense Private Recreation 23 < 1.0% of growth capacity, as well as planned phasing for Water 310 2.8% development from now through 2040. Right-of-Way —2,000 18.1% Total 11,181 100% CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Land Use 4-17 Apple Figure 4.6-2040 Land Use Plan A� ��Vatti -��.i 1 EAGAN idlaL` 2040 Future Land Use hi Low Density Residential LEBANON HILLS VALLEYWOOD REGIONAL PARK MUNICIPAL Medium DensityResidential \l��•' MINNESOTA GOLF COURSE / al ZOOLOGICAL �` + High Density Residential INGARDENS125TH ST W Suburban-Intensive ' i High Density Residential A Manufactured Housing ': 4) :::::::: ` rii \ V Commercial , i‘7...:40;, �� ���, Mixed Useos a� `� 1 ' I F t FaquaIndustrialills M ��, iiii Mixed Business CampusPublic and Institutional f Q ill Park and Open Space ,•' WFeyZPrivate Recreation 140TH ST W Alimagnet , Wimp = o UtilitiesWy aWatera I�, - .,aU' y ! x. ^ ��IRight of Waycn�� Temporary Sand&Gravelri ����� 'zOverlaymw.� zNIB o ��• • Y Lake �� • �,1 I � Roadway System .` ® v L - ` 111 I■�� _I LA Arterials and Collectors , 150TH ST W •�ll....�_■ --.L_ r- , v ---- Future Roads IL''' '.:! 1 I orwiLocal Streetsa ___ 1 /� 0 ME- 1 Mal mdult PI %, ft"Z'‘ dki 0 I 0.25 0.5 \ �� ' I ��7 _Tr��^ ..Miles ` IL att. 1 Y. mili _� Cobblestone Lake _ m Lac Lavon • Consulting Group,Inc. NORTH 160TH ST W I• �� LAKE ,t Amn• _ CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update s::• Land Use 4-18 AppValley Figure 4.7 - Difference Between 2030 and 2040 Land Use Plans elJij1 EAGAN 2030 to 2040 Change / fil .f LEBANON HILLS VALLEYWOOD it Low Density Residentialli REGIONAL PARK MUNICIPAL Medium Density Residential ' R. 11 1 OOL SOCAL GOLFcouRSE ,I-- 1 GARDENS 5TH ST W High Density Residential I / • I; - Suburban-Intensive A_ / rei ��� , t _ High Density Residential I 1j a er,* V Manufactured Home Community / ' � li Oft / � NI I Commercial -� / ' �r IA . '� C �j, Mixed Use 1 • o �, -, r`� 1 ei v IndustriaPl 1 ell J Mixed Business Campus �a am-rvarionitk I Public and Institutional R. /1r • peA + Park and Open Space '46111 - .11 � �• , V z Private Recreation ' •T Alimagnefip Lake 0 EEtway I Yii rce' L °- . ea !' ! , () = , • o u . Vile SW j_p_v_,_ . v, ,,,,,te...,_,„ >x \I it'.--\_./ 16 *hp kim111 "1" sr . ,_,),„ iliMrt I - o I ia VII IIIII ..4 %. III - �v I arhm de-Ina 0 0.25 0.5 _ i ��0 ra 4,14,_ w Miles `/ �1910 vv. ,_ Cobblestone Lake c II MI►�I A �� 1JP r 160 '` r \ fr ,� GensolINg GrooN Inc. NORTH v , *. r 1 LAKEVILLE' r CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Land Use 4-19 AppValley Figure 4.8 -Development Phasing 0 H I ry • I EAGAN Development Phase lir MINNESOTA LEBANON HILLS YALLEYWOOD Residential/Mixed Use 1 ' e % ZOOLOGICAL -V REGIONAL PAR MUNICIPAL , \\\\�1���i�'111.__.. (f�� GARDENS GOLF COURSE ■ 2020 ,� I U y � �Z I 20304 /\ . • -1 ire lilL 2040 5 � II_ i ir&I �� V Non-Residential litibii �,� R i 2020 1 `/� ilm I otint-- 1 A - - A girt-__2030 TJ , ` P2040 - ien r . ii °G�t4f 4fir �fi s ��tff-; . F� 140TH ST W � � �� \� / . W I k ., , , w WI & vir0 � �\ li � ' a r i r.'" it .. ,, , 0 _ ° Ce j /l I1 �� 111 -PI s,t i , 7,„ . A , AAP at_treli I 141 . �� o OT 1ST W . I `► 4 ki.l'i now _4.m , q L, I via , .... . ,,, jiI Miles in eps ■ ��� f `, ���Sil A WALIEleMiti VIIIIN ConsWNnH GrRTH , I —r `� �\ ram•` 'RO Ir GM 160TH ST W i Li' -� ��1 P- I* .- , l 1 I LAKE ` H- My - - CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Land Use 4-20 AppValley Phasing Plan Household Growth and Devel- The City of Apple Valley is expected to grow until opment Capacity it is fully developed by 2040. The phasing plan In 2017, the Metropolitan Council estimated that demonstrates that the City can provide the nec- Apple Valley had 20,149 housing units. In 2018, essary services and infrastructure for future the Metropolitan Council estimated 20,361 units. growth, and that it can meet its 10-year growth The Metropolitan Council forecasts that Apple forecasts as well as its affordable housing alloca- Valley will have 24,900 households by 2040. tion. Figure 4.8 illustrates the likely phasing of Based on this forecast, the City will plan for an residential and non-residential development for additional 4,539 units. Since the 2017 estimate, each decade of the plan (2020, 2030, and 2040). 1,470 housing units have been constructed in the Some uses are phased out (e.g., Sand and City. Table 4.2 shows that planned residential Gravel, Rural Residential, and vacant properties), development will produce between 2,544 and while other uses expand and new uses are intro- 4,553 housing units, demonstrating that Apple duced (e.g., Mixed Business Campus, Suburban Valley will meet its overall housing goal. Apple Intensive High Density Residential). Orchard Valley's goal for affordable housing is to construct Place will be completed in stages, with most of 468 afford- able units between 2020 and 2030. the development occurring between 2030 and Residential categories that are guided at densi- 2040. Scattered vacant parcels and infill sites are ties of at least 8 units per acre can count toward also expected to be developed over the course of this goal. Table 4.2 shows that Apple Valley has the plan. Redevelopment of underutilized proper- identified enough residential development to ac- ties will likely occur and is encouraged when fea- commodate at least 568 units at densities of 8 sible. units per acre or higher by 2030, demonstrating Table 4.2 shows the capacity for residential de- the City's ability to meet its regional affordable velopment, including the total acreage and num- housing allocation. The Housing Chapter identi- ber of units, for each residential land use catego- fies additional strategies to help produce afforda- ry, corresponding to the phasing periods in Fig- ble housing, maintain affordable rents, and con- ure 4.8. Dwelling units are calculated from the nect low-income renters with the resources they mid- point of the density ranges that are guided need. for each use. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Land Use 4-21 Apple Table 4.2 Guided Residential Acreage, Densities, and Dwelling Units 2020 2030 2040 Totals (Present to 2020) (2021 to 2030) (2031 to 2040) Density Range Density Range Units Units Units Units Units Units Units Land Use Acres Acres Units Low Acres Acres Units High (Units/Acre) (Units/acre) Low High High Law High Low Midpoint LD (3 to 6) 3 6 1.11(1. ) 42(1,2) 420.2) 35.6 106.8 213.6 10.8 32.4 64.8 57.5 181.2 250.8 320.4 MD (6 to 12) 6 12 0 0 0 20.9 125.4 250.8 19.5 117 234 40.4 242.4 363.6 484,8 HD(12 to 40) 12 40 11I' 41,3 :i.,i {1.5 igfi 19L 27)6 H.2A iisl 6421 1 s1 0 0 0 39.5 588.8 713.4 838 SIHD(24ta 48) 24 cg JI1fl 2331iAl 233iidl 7.3 175.2,6I 350.4- 7.1 170.4 340.8 19.4 578.6 751.4 924.2 Totals(Mapped 28 471 471 91.4 800.2 1456.8 37.4 319.8 639.6 156.8 1591 2079.2 2567.4 Units per Acre 10.147 13.250 16.374 Unmapped Op- .< .< h h h portunity Areas - v= _ V V v V 0 59.3 952.8 1,985.E 59.3 952.8 1,4E9.2 1,985.E Grand Totals 28 471 471 91.4 800.2 1,456.8 96.7 1,272.6 2,625.2 216.1 2,543.g 3,548.4 4553 Units per Acre 1 1.771 16.420 21.069 Housing Need Housing Provided (2021-2u=.C) 4.233 units on 5 acres guided"SIHD"(Suburban Intensive 2040 Households Est. 24,900 2021-2030 800.2 1,456.8 High Density) includes 175 units under construction at the Nuvelo apartment development and 58 units at Zvago 2017 Estimate Met Council 20,149 2031-2040 1,272.E 2,E25-2 Central Village Senior Cooperative which opened the 2018 Estimate Met Council 20,361 2,072.8 4,082 summer of 2019. Units Needed 4,539 Footnotes: 5.27.6 acres guided"HD"(High Density)in 2020 includes a large tow nhome development that will not begin 1.Indicates the actual number of units approved for development.Apple construction until the completion of the 2040 Comp Plan Housing Units Needed Valley has experienced significant growth in high density multiple family Update. Of 27.6 acres,18.7 acres are designated for a Units Needed 4,539 development during the 2017-2019 time period.A number of projects have 286-unit tow nhome development,The Shores. The Units Constructed Since 2017 1,470 been approved or are currently under construction. In the instances noted, balance of the 2020 HD acreage is 8.9 acres. Using the Balance Units Needed 3,069 the City has used actual unit numbers for the approved developments. standard density range calculation,8.9 acres C 12 Units Provided (Law) 2,544 Rather than calculating a theoretical range of units based on density,the unitslacre=106.8 units. 106.8 units+286 units=392.8.At City seeks to receive credit for the actual number of units that have been the high end of the HD range,at 40 u/a,8.9 acres=356 Units Provided (Mid) 3,548 approved and are currently under construction or expected to begin units.356 units+286 Shores units=642 total units. Units Provided (High) 4,553 construction shortly after approval of the 2040 Plan Update. 6.In the 2021 to 2030 timeframe,392.8 units in the HD 2.42 units on 11.1 acres guided'LD"(Low Density)is the Quarry Ponds 5th category,and 175.2 units in the SIHD category,are units and 6th Addition,a detached single family home development,currently projected to be constructed at densities greater than 8 Affordable Units Required (2021-2030) under construction. Located on the northeast corner of Johnny Cake units an acre.Apple Valley's affordable housing need is Units Needed 46$ 3.156 units approved on 11.5 acres guided"HD"[High Density]is the estimated to be a minimum 468 units. With a total of 568 Afford Units (>8 units/acre density) Springs at Cobblestone Lake development on the northeast corner of Pilot units.Apple Valley will achieve the minimum density Units Provided 2021-2030 5E8' Knob Road and 160th Street West. It is a rental tow nhome development requirement to support affordability. currently under construction. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Land Use 4-22 Apple„ Residential Uses detached dwellings, duplexes, twin homes, town- Low Density Residential (LD) broadly consists of homes, and other types of attached housing. In Promoting the public's health, safety, and welfare single-family, detached dwellings. This is the sin- starts with caring for residential neighborhoods. A the past, housing densities ranged from 1/2 to 6 gle largest land use in Apple Valley.A large base of units per acre. Today, the Land Use Plan places variety of residential uses is required to meet the owner-occupied homes promotes neighborhood diverse needs of Apple Valley residents.Apple Val- housing densities in Low Density Residential are- stability by reducing resident turnover and en- as at 3—6 units per acre. ley uses low-, medium-, and high-density residen- couraging homeowner investment in private tial to provide different functions, and strives for an property. Low-Density Residential (single-family However, the City recognizes that in some cases appropriate distribution of these uses to meet the residential) is the most restrictive zone. Limiting of infill development when there are severe current and forecasted needs and desires of the conflicts with high-intensity uses ensures that slopes, mature trees, lakes, wetlands, or existing community. The following text and tables summa- property values are protected over time. Protect- adjacent residential neighborhoods, it may not be rize the intent of each residential use, both indi- ed property values help maintain stable neigh- practical to meet the density standard. vidually and within the broader land use context. borhoods and directly benefit local citizens The City will use the zoning ordinance and other A fuller description is included in the Future Land through contributions to the municipal tax base. land use controls to manage this land use cate- Use Plan. Housing is discussed in greater detail in gory. Most existing single-family residential Low Density neighborhoods benefit from a variety Chapter 5. of services and institutions, including parks, play- neighborhoods are zoned R-1, R-2, R-3 or R-CL. Low Density Residential (LD) grounds, schools, religious institutions, and ap- Additionally, the R-5 (two-family); M-1, M-2, and propriate-scale commercial. A system of safe and M-3 (multiple-family), and PD (planned develop- Use type examples: Single-family detached ment) districts are eligible for this land use cate- homes, duplexes, twin homes, townhomes well-designed sidewalks and trails is essential to connect with schools, parks, downtown, and other gory provided that the performance criteria set ,;h E forth in the zoning ordinance are met. Y I _ 4�.», k;� it t destinations in the community. �,� ,'�,, { f � x���l �� . ,��,� Medium Density Residential (MD) ' , < t. • �,. v A variety of housing types may be built in Low �.t ' '" - : _- Densit Residential areas includin. sin.le-famil Use type examples: Duplexes (side-by-side or r ''z 1, `'i } , A. 4: �:,? '"�15 ` , f;'' : stacked), carriage houses, triplexes, four- ` '`' l'` ' ' : 1 4 , n e ,AT.4#t+c w } plexes, bungalow courts, townhomes ri _• F i!Ill lllllllllt�r 1.-.- Er Th.' , - /` 1:::41:r� 4 'M1"V f.' l i�C. 4 J J 41 r N- pg1 -i 1 _ ;II 1. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Land Use 4-23 AppValley Nationwide, alternative single-family living options buffer between lower-density residential and are increasingly becoming an attractive option for .A► mmo. A higher-intensity commercial or industrial uses. aging baby boomers seeking a transition to a liv- rid "-' .. -� This goal is rational in theory, but care should be ing environment that offers independence without m':grii s 0 ` ' i taken to ensure that undesirable impacts are not the maintenance requirements and property tax t 1 igi $ ' ,TF inequitably offloaded onto a greater number of bill associated with conventional single-family de- "`" �,. - -' residents. Buffer treatments, including landscap- tached housing. Medium-density residential typi- - ing and building/site orientation, can minimize the cally provides housing at a lower price point than impacts of light, noise, and traffic on high-density low-density residential and helps enable the City areas. The strategic location of a row of garages, High Density Residential (HD) consists of at- to meet its share of regional affordable housing tached multifamily housing. The City benefits for example, can shield apartments from the noise requirements. from high-density development by capitalizing and activity of a nearby highway. Medium Density Residential (MD) land uses in- on efficiencies in the provision of infrastructure, High Density Residential areas include multiple- clude townhomes, other attached single-family services, and attached-building construction, family structures (apartments and condominiums) dwellings, and low-rise apartments and condo- and the increased concentration of taxpayers at densities greater than 12 units per acre to the miniums at densities that range from 6-12 units per unit area. High-density residential neigh- extent allowed by the zoning ordinance. Devel- borhoodsper acre. This designation fits with the M-4, M-5, bene- fit from proximity to services opments with densities of up to 40 units per acre such as shopping, transit, daycare, recreation, M-6, and PD zoning districts. are allowed in the areas within and adjacent to and other similar uses. Retail shopping centers High DensityResidential (HD) and service the downtown if certain performance standards in g providers likewise benefit from a dense local customer base. Providing these the zoning code are met. The HD designation fits Use type examples: Courtyard apartments, uses near to high-density residential leads to with M-7, M-8, and PD zoning districts. High cottage flats, conventional apartment building Density Residential requires additional provision complexes mutual efficiencies and lessens dependence on private vehicles. High-density residential devel- of parking, infiltration, and buffering from incom- ,j� /- patible uses. Buildingsetback, bulk requirements, / / opments should be located where services are q _ - •• ,n currently available and convenient or are ex- lot-coverage requirements, and parking require- =��r-- _ r III II' F _ ._-_} petted to be in the future. ments are outlined in the zoning code. .) i H F {;; l® 1 it Linking people to jobs and services is critical. Suburban Intensive High Density Res- -II Y.� f ; yy High-density developments can be leveraged for idential (SIHD) „ '-- - economic development purposes and suburban . '- Use type examples: Multiple story apartments, .....w.-—-'"'71 iaum transit-oriented development. As such, they are condominiums and cooperative complexes frequently located on high-volume arterial cord- dors with access to retail and services. Often, Suburban Intensive High Density Residential high-density residential is considered as a "use" (BIRD)consists of sites that the City has approved CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Land Use 4-24 AppValley that would be exclusively for residential develop- vertically in a common structure or horizon- are designated for Mixed Use. Within Downtown, ment at densities greater than 24 units per acre tally in a common, well-defined site or area. the City intends to use the suburban intensive high and most often average 40 units per acre. SIHD Apple Valley's objectives for Mixed Use are as fol- density designation in areas already approved for is located adjacent to the METRO Red Line lows: high density multiple family development. How- transit stations and takes advantage of the prod- ever, Mixed Use could be considered for redevel- • Organize land in a compact and walkable en- ucts and services conveniently located in the opment of scattered parcels, though this is not vironment. Downtown. The SIHD designation does not in- shown on the future land use map. Mixed Use •crease the density of the parcels shown, but ra Ensure that Mixed Use PD site plans include may be implemented through a planned unit de- strong, well-defined internal and external mul- ther recognizes the densities already approved by velopment. The City will also use design stand- timodal City. This land use designation is served with connections, especially for pedestri- the ards and other land use controls to achieve its ans and bicyclists. a PD zoning designation. desired outcomes for this category. • Set standards for private development and Manufactured Housing public improvements that produce enduring Commercial Land Uses and the In the 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update, the City quality and enhance the character and identity Downtown is creating a new land use category called "Manu- of Apple Valley. • Encourage parking strategies that support Commercial factured Housing" to recognize and maintain the two existing manufactured neighborhoods in Ap- greater intensity of use and which promote Use type examples: Retail, office, and service- ple Valley. The two neighborhoods are located pedestrian activity in Mixed Use districts. related uses adjacent to Cedar Avenue in the north end of the • Integrate green/open space into Mixed Use .. areas. community and may face redevelopment pressure I r ,il i over the course of this plan, especially if connec- • Improve environmental conditions, such as ' r 1 + tions to transit services are improved. The City in- water quality and energy use, through devel- !,'; 1 II 1 t_ ` ` tends to maintain the two neighborhoods to en- opment incentives. I sure unsubsidized affordable housing is available • Connect Mixed Use areas to public facilities, ? _j in Apple Valley. including transit systems, and to the broader i community. ��-I' • Mixed Use (MIX) A distinction is made between Mixed Use and The Commercial (C) designation includes a wide Use type examples: Live/work units, and Mixed Business Campus, with MBC reserved for variety of retail, office, and service uses that vary planned unit developments Orchard Place, where it is intended to guide in intensity and off-site impacts. The City uses the Mixed Use (MIX) areas contain a mix of retail and higher-intensity development and promote eco- zoning ordinance to regulate the intensity and service businesses, office, institutional, medium nomic growth. characteristics of development. Lower-intensity and high-density residential, public uses, and/or Currently, only three parcels in the Central Village park and recreation uses. The uses may be mixed CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Land Use 4-25 Apple. districts include Limited Business and Neighbor- this commercial category. Applicable performance General Business hood Commercial. Higher-intensity districts in- standards include: Use type examples: Large commodity busi- clude General Business and Retail. In each dis- • High-quality site and architectural design. nesses (e.g. car dealership) trict, land use and performance standards set pa- Building materials are expected to promote ._ rameters for development. Examples include pleasing off-site views of the development. parking, building setbacks, infiltrations, site ac- • Buffering and screening to the residential land ' VALLEY ___` cess, and lot coverage. uses is limited to the parking areas and de- LL_, I 1 .1 _IT o .i J L I % • The following descriptions provide guidance on livery areas due to limited off-site impacts as- �_ the type, character, and location of commercial sociated with limited business uses them- - P„ _ .•f,„:_ � land uses. selves; , ' • Landscaping shall consist of aesthetic treat- A l'illo lf, Limited Business ~• • 4 ment to complement existing vegetation re- Use type examples: General office and non-re- tained on the site, and to enhance building General business uses are larger commodity re- tail businesses(e.g. medical offices) design and soften parking lot areas. tail services that primarily serve private other • Significant traffic attracted by the site devel- business and industrial needs as well as resi- opment shall be generally limited to the dents. These uses have the potential to create morning and evening peak hours with modest off-site impacts and may not be appropriate adja- levels of off-peak activity. Weekend traffic im- cent to residential neighborhoods the GB and al �,,,=�ar`� pacts should be minimal. GB-1 zoning districts accommodate commercial L:=ma -m. _-� _:_ Driveway access points to the use shall be uses within this land use category. Applicable - from non local streets or those designed for performance standards include: ---� primarily non-residential traffic. No direct ac- 'i� High-quality site design and building materials cess to County Road 42 or Cedar Avenue shall be allowed, except as permitted by Da- are expected to be used to promote pleasing The limited business designation is reserved for kota County. off-site views of the development. general offices and businesses that exclude retail Lighting is limited to parking lot, sign and • Buffering and screening of loading dock and •activities. Business operations usually occur with- delivery areas from adjacent land uses should building illumination designed for customer in an enclosed building and are generally limited and employee safety with attention to impacts be provided due to noise and activity within to weekdays. These uses are located adjacent to to adjacent residential uses. these areas. the retail core of the downtown and may act as a • Landscaping shall be used to provide interrup- transition to residential neighborhoods. The LB, tion of long building walls and to soften park- LB-1, and PD zoning districts are applicable with ing lot areas. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Land Use 4-26 Apple. • Traffic impacts are not expected to be as sig- PD.Applicable performance standards include the Neighborhood Service nificant as those created by large uses in the following: Use type examples: neighborhood market and Retail district. However, freight traffic is char- • High-quality site and architectural design and drug store acteristic of uses in this land category. Space building materials are expected to be used to for truck maneuvering should be planned for These uses are defined as limited commercial promote pleasing offsite views of the devel- these uses. areas that accommodate the opportunity for a opment. • Driveway access points to the development limited amount of convenience retail shops such • Landscaping shall be installed to provide as grocery and drugstores; residential services shall be from non-local streets or those de aesthetic treatment of buildings and to soften g y g signed for primarily non-residential traffic. Di- such as dry cleaning and daycare; and accessory rect access should be limited to roadways parking lot areas. small offices. These areas are zoned RB and planned and designed for heavy vehicles. No • Significant traffic impacts during the week- NCC. Applicable performance standards include: direct access to County 42 or Cedar Avenue day and weekends is associated with retail development. Traffic studies may be required • High-quality site and architectural design and shall be allowed, except as may be permitted building materials are expected to be used to by Dakota County. in conjunction with the review of large devel- opments or high traffic-generating uses that integrate development into surrounding • Lighting is limited to parking lot, sign and have the potential to negatively impact the in- neighborhoods. building illumination designed for customer tegrity of the existing and planned roadway • The scale of development is expected to be and employee safety. Loading and delivery system. Developments that lower the level of limited in size to complement adjacent devel- areas shall be screened from off-siteviews. service on adjacent roadways or intersections opment and designed with a residential char- Retail may be required to install traffic improvements acter. to improve the level of service to its pre- de- . Parking and delivery areas should be limited Retail uses typically encompass the traditional velopment condition if City approval is grant- to non-residential sides of the development to community shopping businesses and occupy ed. remove off-site impacts of noise and activity. much of the downtown area. This commercial land • Driveway access points to the development No uses with drive-up windows shall be al- use is intended to accommodate a wide range of shall be from non-local streets or those de- lowed if they cannot be located/buffered in a goods and service retailers. Off-site impacts in- signed for primarily non-residential traffic. No manner that protects residential areas. elude activity, light, noise, and generally higher direct access to County Road 42 or Cedar . Landscaping shall consist of buffering of ad- traffic impacts than other commercial uses. Resi- Avenue shall be allowed, except as may be jacent residential uses from parking areas dential developments are not allowed within this permitted by Dakota County. and aesthetic treatment of buildings. land use category except for those planned in . Lighting is limited to parking lot, sign and . Traffic impacts from development are intend- conjunction with a planned development (PD), or building illumination designed for customer ed to be local, as opposed to trips from other within the upper floors of multi-level buildings as and employee safety. community or sub-regional markets. a conditional use to ensure that impacts are miti- • gated. Retail land uses will be zoned RB, SC, and Driveway access to the development shall be directed away from residential homes. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Land Use 4-27 Apple„ • Lighting is limited to parking lot and building Industrial (IND) • Landscaping shall consist of aesthetic treat- illumination designed for customer and em- ment to provide interruption of long building Use type examples: Goods manufacturing, ployee safety. Building and parking area light- processing, and warehousing walls and to soften parking lot areas. ing shall not be allowed during the time the • Exterior storage of materials and equipment businesses are closed, except as necessary shall be completely enclosed, or screened for safety and security. from all property lines by a fence or wall. • Given its proximity to residential areas, hours • Heavy freight vehicles are characteristic of of operation of the use(s)shall be limited. uponor uses in this land use category. Space for truck Industrial and Mixed Business w �,r r and vehicle maneuvering needs to be planned Employment Areas for these uses. Weekend trip attraction to in- dustrial sites should be minimal. As explained in the Community Context chapter • Driveway access to the development shall be (3), Apple Valley has a relative lack of high wage from non-local streets or those designed for above the hourlymetro average) job opportuni- primarily non-residential traffic. No direct ac- ( g ) pP Industrial (IND) allows offices, assembly, ware- cess to County Road 42 shall be allowed. ties. Therefore, it is important to designate prop- house, manufacturing, and other similar activities erty for the creation of jobs and to expand oppor- within an enclosed building to limit the amount of • Lighting is limited to parking lot and building tunities for people to live and work in Apple Valley. dust, noise, odor, and other adverse impacts. The illumination designed for employee safety. An overarching vision for the land use plan is to current zoning district categories that regulate in- Mixed Business Campus (MBC) provide opportunities for higher-wage businesses dustrial uses include I-1, 1-2, BP and PD. Perfor- and workers to thrive in the City. land useplan Use type examples: Research and development, Y mance standards in the Industrial district include office park, and hospital does this by identifying ample areas that could be the following: developed or redeveloped for business and em- Mixed Business Campus (MBC) areas are in- • High-quality site design and building materials tended to be high-qualitysettin s for office ployment purposes, including manufacturing facili- g cam- are expected to be used to promote pleasing ties,office space, research and development sites, pus, office with light industrial, office with biomed- off-site views of the development and medical and healthcare facilities. The Indus- ical manufacturing, health care facilities, health • This land use designation shall not be locat- trial training, general office, corp orate office, and trial (IND) and Mixed Business Campus (MBC) p ed adjacent to residential land uses without a other higher-intensity employment uses. districts accommodate many of these uses, and significant buffer, which consists of distance- help g y solidify the City's economic base. berming, heavy landscaping, decorative Mixed retail and commercial service uses that fences/walls, or a combination thereof as de- serve the campus and adjacent neighborhoods termined by the area characteristics deemed will be limited in area and to activities that support adequate by the City. Loading and delivery the employment objectives of the MBC. Some areas shall be screened from off-site views. examples of supportive uses include lodging, res- taurants, daycare, banking, and other retail uses CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Land Use 4-28 Apple. that may support the campus directly as well as adjacent neighborhoods. Such uses should gen- erally be located along County Road 42. The mix of uses in the MBC district includes the ••.--.. • • - following: - '__ •:. - • 55—65% office - ., -�I 77 -._1- - t 1.-- I I • : -- :- , • 10-20% light industry/manufacturing _ — 1 • • 10% office warehouse/showroom ,_ •• =� •.- • 5% commercial and retail uses r -. � J - � - •�►+ k This modeling is further discussed in the Economic �. _ ___.-,, r;E.- -'; ,'- 'ti- y _ • • -• Development Chapter (6), which references land _ • .Ar `.•- .v. ,� s' = `_ • p use percentages, FAR ratios, and job-creation _ '' r " . '"' `' S ' -, y p 9 j ► is goals. ; -• ter.,-.r:_ The Mixed Business Campus is distinguished from ; • Mixed Use by its economic development focus, _r... -• - -, -ilk ilk - higher intensity uses, and lower residential yield. The MBC area at Orchard Place will be developed value of surrounding properties. The City seeks to maximize the local benefits of re- through a site master plan and PUD process. Schools, hospitals, and places of worship give gional park and institutional uses while avoiding ex- Parks, Institutions, and Open neighborhoods definition. These uses are a pansion or changes in use that have a significant Space source of community pride. They drive residen- negative impact on adjacent residential properties. tial property values and neighborhood reinvest- Undesirable impacts include traffic, light, and noise. Institutions (INST) ment. Apple Valley citizens are proud of their Buffering techniques should be incorporated into the strong public school system. The largest institu- designs of planned institutional and similar land us- Use type examples: Schools, religious institu- tion is the Minnesota Zoo, which is an asset for tions, libraries, and civic buildings, es that are located adjacent to residential uses. the entire Twin Cities region. Government facili- Institutional (INST) districts are public or quasi- ties are a prime example of institutional uses. The implementing zoning districts for institutional public amenities, excluding parks that greatly im- The City Municipal Center, the Dakota County li- properties are the P-Institutional District and the pact the character of the community. Although brary, the Dakota County Western Services Cen- Planned Development (PD)district. public uses require public investment or donations ter (WSC), and the US post office, etc., should and do not generate taxes of their own, the value be all concentrated in Downtown Apple Valley to of these amenities is reflected by increasing the best serve the community. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Land Use 4-29 Apple. Parks (P) f - Private Recreation -` _ ems 44 y,: The Parks (P) designation is applied to all existing z I r A distinction is made between publicly-owned and :_ z t 7:, � �h ', _ , privately-owned owned open space. The Apple Valley parks, public playfields, trail corridors, and � � p Y- p p Pp __ - Golf Course is designated as Private Recreation golf courses. Trails are connecting elements, not 4 „ zones. Property that is intended forpark purposes • E_- tl 1- (PR)to differentiate it from the public park system. p Y P p »- - �, in the future is depicted on the 2040 land use plan � The Plan recognizes that the golf course could be map. Future neighborhood parks that result from sold or redeveloped if market conditions are fa- subdivision development have not been depicted vorable. Any change in land use will be reviewed on the map since the exact location of the park , � �, � -; � carefully to ensure the proposed new develop- will not be known until development occurs. The . x;�, $' `'c - _� !. ment is compatible with the surrounding area and need and area of futureparks are discussed in the {= f ,l �" `f the overall development plans and vision for Apple a F;1 _ / • 1- Parks Chapter. The provision of parks associated Valley. The current Institutional zoning designation • best reflects the present use and numerous alter- with development require an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan at the time of development native uses maybe allowed in the future. The it, review. The zoning districts that accommodate f course is surrounded by Low Density residential parks are the P-Institutional District and PD. _. neighborhoods, which will have an interest in any land use change or proposed development. Commercial uses are generally not encouraged —� - unless the uses are integrated in the overall de- - velopment in a mixed-use, PD-style design. f ; , r Y •P' i jl} IIINIl6] IBILI 1 ir��Whnlgld "I �F''- , :LEGACY IJ�III hh]]X •o .y x CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Land Use 4-30 AppValley Water/Pond Existing lakes and storm water ponds are desig- •_� tx G. ;' ,• nated as Water/Pond (W) on the 2040 land use r xr' map. The shoreland around Alimagnet, Farquar, and Long Lakes are regulated by a zoning overlay ,. district, which is shown as Shoreland District-SH on the zoning map. Other waterbodies including x r x•` ` wetlands and waterways are not designated onnut Jill • I I t 4-40 the 2040 land use plan but are depicted on maps included in the City's Stormwater Management . -Plan. ., t `✓ rk€' 7. r t m '! a r r. f:;%. f - y .fryr1a-. +a"1 J°.4 f�r,, dgft .P#1 ''' s s ' : i J ,o ' r, 'Or.At r• Y 6 -}- rx CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Land Use 4-31 Apple Valley Goals and Policies GENERAL DEVELOPMENT Goal 4.1 Direct development to meet the household,social,spiritual, recreational,and professional needs of the City's residents and workforce. Prioritized consideration will be given to development proposals that reflect the community needs and desires expressed in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Plans that do not meet a significant need will be critically reviewed. Policies All new housing developments will be located within one-half mile of a park and connected to the park by sidewalk or trail. Multi-family developments that are not located within one-half mile of a park must incorporate a practical recreation area into their site design. Goal 4.2 Land use conflicts are minimized to maintain the functional integrity of distinct uses and individual property values. Utilize local land use controls to cluster like uses and physically separate or buffer incompatible uses. In general,excessive light, noise,and activity should be directed away from residential neighborhoods. The City will review the degree of potential land use incompatibilities based on the objective analysis of potential impacts associated with the specific uses proposed. Policies Non-residential parking areas may not be located adjacent to residential uses unless a proper buffer is created. The face(s)of buildings containing a drive-up facility(such as a bank teller window)may not be located adjacent to a residential use unless a suitable buffer is approved. Adequate buffers should be provided,where feasible,to separate neighborhoods from roadways that carry significant traffic volumes. Goal 4.3 Apple Valley is a community with strong,cohesive,identifiable neighborhoods. Community assets such as schools,community centers, historic buildings, parks,and religious institutions are integral to their neighborhoods and should be maintained in a good state of repair,leveraged for outreach opportunities,and expanded as necessary. Policies The City of Apple Valley encourages and supports local neighborhood associations. Zoning, buffering,subdivision regulations,and design guidelines should promote unified neighborhood design. Goal 4.5 Apple Valley's land use plan connects residents to jobs and services. High-density residential development will primarily be oriented in and around the Downtown and along high frequency transit corridors,where it is best supported by transit,shopping,daycare,recreation,and other services. Policies The City will look for opportunities to mix residential and commercial land uses when appropriate. Mixed uses may occur in common structures and in common areas.Projects should be designed to integrate residential units with commercial uses in a cohesive site plan or building,as warranted. Goal 4.6 Apple Valley will attract and retain businesses that provide wages above the metro-area average and benefits,which can sustain a family. The Land Use Plan will be guided to encourage manufacturing,finance, information/technology,medical, bio-medical,and healthcare-related busi- Policies nesses to locate in Apple Valley. Mixed-business areas are encouraged to accommodate non-retail commercial development necessary to attract higher-wage businesses. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Land Use 4-32 Apple" Goal 4.7 A vibrant,successful Downtown is the primary shopping,service,and activity center in Apple Valley. Refer to the Downtown Development Guidelines to implement the community vision for downtown Apple Valley. Encourage taller buildings and more compact site designs Downtown to make the best use of existing infrastructure,facilitate redevelopment,in- crease the tax efficiency of Downtown parcels,and increase opportunities for pedestrian and bicycle access. Policies Increase the number of residents in the Downtown Focus Area to promote activity throughout the day and increase the rate of internal trip capture. Downtown should have strong pedestrian,bike,and auto connections to transit services and facilities. Strip commercial developments along the major roadways extending from Downtown are discouraged. Financing incentives are primarily directed to the Downtown and includes the Downtown Core and the Employment Center at Orchard Place. REHABILITATION AND REDEVELOPMENT Goal 4.8 The City provides a flexible framework to encourage property maintenance and facilitate infill redevelopment and adaptive reuse to sustain an attrac- tive environment and prevent the creation of blight. Development of single vacant residential parcels within residential neighborhoods must be compatible in use,size,and scale with adjacent proper- ties Improvements to existing homes should be compatible in use,size,and scale with adjacent properties. The City uses strategic infill development and redevelopment to improve underutilized properties and neighborhood cohesion,and address housing supply issues. The City will review zoning policies that restrict opportunities for redevelopment and reuse of vacant and underutilized parcels,and pursue amend- ments where necessary. Policies The City will encourage redevelopment when properties are no longer cost-effective to maintain. As needed,the City will establish redevelopment/rehabilitation programs to guide efforts for City involvement in projects. The City will actively monitor the condition of existing buildings for signs of deterioration and to guide public actions in code enforcement, mainte- nance,rehabilitation,foreclosure response,and redevelopment. The City will actively explore options for the replacement of housing units that are displaced by redevelopment or disaster with a similar type,cost, and density of housing within the community,and preferably within the same neighborhood. Parcel redevelopment efforts will target aging facilities and underperforming properties as property owners are ready to redevelop. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY I 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Land Use 4-33 AppValley TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT Goal 4.9 The City will use"suburban-intensive"transit-oriented development to increase appropriate housing opportunities and support a compatible mix of residential, retail commercial,and other commercial uses. The City will encourage higher density housing and employment-based land uses that are located within 1/4 mile of the Cedar Avenue transitway and the conceptual Country Road 42 transitway. Policies The City will plan for an orderly,compact mix of residential,commercial,and employment uses around transit station nodes,emphasizing walkable connections between sites. Goal 4.1uIDowntown development and redevelopment will enhance walking and bicycling in Apple Valley. When opportunities arise,the City will create new linkages for roads,trails,and sidewalks in Downtown to break up the existing patterns of super- Policies blocks. New and improved linkages to transit corridors will be designed to foster an inviting experience for pedestrians and bicyclists. Goal 4.11 The City will manage parking supply to reduce the amount of unused surface parking. The City will encourage opportunities for shared parking arrangements, new parking ramps,and other schemes to reduce the demand for excessive/ unused surface parking. Policies The City will evaluate parking requirements for existing commercial uses and actual parking demand for existing commercial development and will adjust requirements if necessary. INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS The City will maintain a cooperative relationship with other governmental,quasi-governmental,and other non-profit organizations that serve the com- Goal 4.12 munity to advance the vision for Apple Valley,and ensure that the focus of programs,facilities,and specific land uses are reflective of Apple Valley' needs. The City will share development efforts with Independent School District#196 and Independent School District#191 on an ongoing basis to coordi- nate the appropriate sharing of resources and services. The City will encourage cooperation and participation with adjacent communities in the review and development of planning and community develop- ment activities. Policies The City will continue to work with Dakota County and regional agencies in dealing with facility or system improvements and programs. The City will partner with State, Regional,and County Economic Development Agencies and foster a positive and supportive role with the Apple Valley Chamber of Commerce and local business organizations. The City will continue to support the Dakota County Historical Society and local efforts of the Historical Committee to preserve historically and/or culturally significant buildings and sites in the community. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Land Use 4-34 Apple„ Energy Goal 4.13 The City seeks to minimize energy waste and increase the role of renewables in the public and private sectors. The City will actively monitor energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions to assess efficiencies on an annual basis. The City encourages developments to make effective and appropriate use of renewable energy sources,including increased use of distributed solar, wind,geothermal evaluation, biogas,and solid waste utilization. The City encourages developments that use recycled materials and/or low-impact materials. The City will protect access to renewable energy sources,including solar and wind,that fit with existing land uses and development patterns,enabling Policies landowners to choose to self-generate energy. The City will increase energy resilience for critical facilities such as police,fire,and emergency response centers. The City will work to reduce energy demand by educating and incentivizing the public to increase conservation and reduce consumption of electricity and water use. The City emphasizes land and roadway development design that minimizes vehicle miles traveled by reducing trip length and increasing the share of trips taken via public transit,car sharing,or active modes. The City will encourage electric vehicle charging stations where they are needed and appropriate. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY I 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Land Use 4-35 Apple 5. Housing and Neighborhoods it The purpose of this chapter is to identify housing .- — needs and to provide a foundation for local deci- ' ti sion-making to guide residential development and redevelopment efforts in Apple Valley.Apple Valley strives to provide a balanced stock of high-quality ' housing to meet the diverse needs of existing ' - I N Ill - . and future residents. Sufficient, desirable housingMH #` , * _{ . l' ....� .,, s is the building block for strong, healthy neighbor- _ 4 ---; .. 11 ‘\t. ,�,`411%.ti } r/ ',1. . - i{ ' hoods. Housing is the largest use of land in the f # ." + ` ' . ;, . ''.4 ' City; the character of residential neighborhoods i r,. . .. ; ,.,'-•� - a significant role in shaping the every-day I * 3 . .1- ' plays 9 p 9 Y- Y f - -.:t±�* experience of Apple Valley residents and helps •hiiihn ,• ...2. , -'. r create a sense of place and belonging. III . -`; tti .+•;� .._ . . , _ I 5 • sue."_ 4. %., �• . . ! ' 111,..r....!..). 1 : . . ''' - I . : ni-l'i- -- I.. F #: 4r -ii , �' i` •i ;- 4. i, . • __ -N. -... -7 _ - A . r- - CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Housing 5-1 Vaikey Apple Valley residents are proud of their neigh- 473.859, Subd.2c) The Comprehensive Plan of 468 units for Apple Valley, which the Compre- borhoods and the quality of life they afford. Within must also include a housing implementation pro- hensive Plan states "can be achieved by both the the last 10-20 years,targeted development has in- gram that de- scribes "official controls to imple- private market and Dakota County Community creased the overall diversity of the housing stock. ment the housing element of the land use plan, Development Agency development activities." As various demographics grow and change, the which will provide sufficient existing and new The Comprehensive Plan also indicates that the City will continue to expand housing choice to housing to meet the local unit's share of the met- City will continue to follow the goals outlined in meet the needs of different residents. ropolitan area need for low and moderate income the Livable Communities Act and update its goals Likewise, the City is committed to providing its housing." (Minnesota Statutes Section 473.859, when Comprehensive Plan updates occur. In the regional share of affordable housing. Lack of af- Subd. 4) period 2021 to 2030, the need/goal has been fur- fordable housing is a national issue. The City will The Livable Communities Act ther stratified. The segments include, a portion continue to encourage affordable housing con- at/or below 30%, 31 to 50% and 51 to 80% of ar- struction through its land use plan and the appli- In 1995, the state legislature created the "Livable ea median income to achieve 468 units of added cation of available tools, resources, and partners Communities Act" (LCA), which affects all cities affordability. Apple Valley has consistently led re- to maintain the quality and price of existing afford- within the 7-county metropolitan area. The Act re- gionally on attracting housing choices that meet able units. quires that the Metropolitan Council evaluate the identified local needs. housing characteristics of each city and generate The Housing Chapter focuses on Apple Valley's Fair Housing Policy guidelines to achieve a diversity of housing housing goals and strategies. These goals and choices in the area. The Act also created the Minnesota's fair housing policy stems from the strategies respond to public feedback,to the hous- LCA's Local Housing Incentives Account (LHIA), Fair Housing Act of 1968. It aims to provide all ing and household data that was summarized in a voluntary program that provides cities the oppor- residents with equal access to Minnesota Hous- the Community Context Chapter, to the affordable tunityto compete forgrants and loans to support ing (MHFA) programs, regardless of race, color, housing allocation need, and marketplace oppor- activities p pp p g g activities that help meet affordable and life-cycle creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, tunities. housing goals. status with regard to public assistance, disability, Statutory Requirements The City elected in 1996 to participate in the LHIA familial status, gender identity, or sexual orienta- and negotiated multiple agreements with the Met tion. Minnesota Housings Fair Housing web page The Land Planning Act ropolitan Council, which identified affordable and provides numerous resources and helpful links, State Law requires that the Comprehensive Plan life-cycle housing goals. The goals generally en- including information for housing providers, in- contains a housing element that includes "stand- couraged 75% ownership housing and 25%rental formation about tenants' legal rights, and contact housingwith aportion beingaffordable. Partici a- information for community resources. ards, plans, and programs for providing adequate p housin opportunities to meet existingandpro- tion in the LHIA allowed the City to submit applica- • g pp Existing Conditions jected local and regional housing needs, including tions for LCA grants for a variety of projects. but not limited to the use of official controls and The adopted 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Apple Valley is a mature, suburban metropolitan land use planning to promote the availability of acknowledges the Metropolitan Council's alloca- community. Many neighborhoods are comprised land for the development of low and moderate tion of Affordable Housing Need for 2021 to 2030 of single-family homes built during the 1960s income housing." (Minnesota Statutes, Section CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Housing 5-2 Valley 1970s. The character of suburban development services and the Apple Valley Transit Station. land and redevelopment opportunities. reflected desires for large properties, good Cities are forever. Every city uses the positive Following a surge in construction of town homes schools, safety, and other amenities — the same from 2000 to 2009, the market for new develop- aspects of competition to be the best place to qualities that many Apple Valley residents value live, work, shop, learn and recreate. Thoughtfully ment has shifted towards multifamily. Between today. Established neighborhoods are integral to 2000 and 2014, 571 single-family detached units done, as the City has developed in Dakota County Apple Valley's identify and sense of place, and al- were constructed, compared to 756 townhomes in the last decade, defines what it means to be a so create challenges for new development oppor- "community for a lifetime". The Comprehensive and 671 apartment units. From 2015 to 2017, 160 tunities, infill, and connectivity. The established Plan to 2040 instills the attributes contained in the single-family units were constructed during that neighborhoods are efficiently located within a period, compared to 37 townhomes and 224 12 keys to the City vision (see Chapter 2).The pe- mile of the regional highway system, including TH riod 2020 to 2040 offers the best opportunity to 77 (Cedar Avenue) and County Road 42 (150t' apartment units. Through 2020 growth in multi-unit address both jobs and housing with a continuing housing, both ownership rental and cooperative, Street). As the south metro has grown, traffic active marketplace for both; land assets for job continues at a fast rate of growth, (as will be fur- congestion needs to be monitored and the addi- ther discussed in the following sections) as raw creation primarily in the Mixed Business Campus tion of bus rapid transit solutions has offered new land for single-family homes becomes in shorter known as Orchard Place and redevelopment of mobility in the neighborhoods. supply. City population forecasts continue to re- in the 1980s, 1990s, and 2000s, the development flect an estimated growth of 10% each decade. ban intensive housing at guided densities as op- focus shifted toward attached townhomes and portunities present themselves and vacant land multifamily apartments, in response to changing The Community Context chapter further summa- resources are reduced by 2040. market demand and local efforts to offer more rizes the character of Apple Valley's neighbor- The City strives to achieve the complete counts housing choice. This period saw a rise in the hoods and housing stock. related to jobs and households. The jobs count number of homeowner associations (HOAs) and Growth and Development Requires a Corn- is focused on a commitment in 2009, in the 2030 the application of Planned Unit Development con- plete Count Comprehensive Plan, that identifies a key 400 cepts (PUDs) to facilitate alternative housing In 2019, Apple Valley celebrated 50 golden years, acres of land now being actively mined and be- styles and build more cohesive neighborhoods. having become a city by actions taken in 1969. coming a focused mixed business campus (MBC) Mid-density and high-density neighborhoods are Part of the celebration recognized a growth in location where housing is an incidental use on the distributed throughout the City, but tend to be lo- population exceeding projections; a window into edges of a large business and job development cated within and surrounding the Downtown. The the planning, construction and occupancy in the area.As recently as 2016,Alternative Urban Area- Cobblestone Lake neighborhood, completed in last three years recognizes significant multi-unit wide Review(AUAR) studies of the MBC support the last decade, includes a variety of single-family housing additions that had not been experienced 3.4 million square feet of business opportunity. styles, multifamily, and mixed commercial of suc- in the previous 15 years. Job growth exceeds Elsewhere, primarily in the Downtown, opportunity cessful PUD application. Mid-density and high- forecasts as Apple Valley plans for, advocates, areas are presented where the organic growth of density development including attached single- and grows and redevelops employment areas. higher density housing, designated as "suburban family and apartments, are distributed throughout Business attraction, retention, and expansion intensive housing" at densities of 40 to 50 the City, and are now centered in the Downtown was a priority in 2009, in preparing the 2040 units/acre, is already being demonstrated. During Central village area near major shopping and Comprehensive Plan and remains a priority with the last 10 years, and continuing, will be redeve- CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Housing 5-3 Valley lopment of underutilized sites adjacent to the Red the Metropolitan Council. The Housing Chapter counts to 2040. A program to be introduced in 2020 Line BRT corridor. narrative will address the balance of 3,281 units called "Polishing the Apple," will encourage age-in- in increments of 2021 — 2030 and 2031 — 2041. place and extended family solutions for residents to Every decade, the U.S. Census coincides closely Apple Valleysupports that forecastedgrowth can consider byrepairing, investingin and expanding ex- with the preparation and finalization of the Corn- occur pp p g p g occur on land available through the declining isting homes. Apple Valley's last 10 years of hous- prehensive Plan required by statute. Apple Valley, amount of raw land and redevelopment. Most inn- ing efforts, particularly the last three to four years, is historically known for striving for a "complete portantly, the units added represent the best ef- are seen as best practices by Dakota County in de- count" and was considered a leader in response forts of the City in the last 10 years to be respon- fining the attributes of a"community for a lifetime". rates in the country, 2000 and 2010. Again, in sive in approving the types of affordable units and preparation for Census taking in April 2020, the households sought and supported by the Metro- City is reporting through a process of address politan Council. In the broadest policy sense, verification called "Local Update of Census Ad- mixed incomes and generations receive needed dresses — LUCA" and "New Construction Pro- choices in the form of single family to higher den- gram for Ad- dresses Added between March 1, sity apartment units offering ownership, rental and 2018 and April 1, 2019". The critical objective met cooperative choices, and including a mix of both is the identification of the number of housing market rate and affordable units. The occupancy units, at assigned addresses, where people re- rate is extraordinary upon development comple- side. This process has reconciled the addition of tion in that 2017 and 2018 production results in 1,470 new households post 2017 benchmarks an unheard of 100% occupancy upon completion. established by the Metropolitan Council. First-time buyers are discovering affordable exist- Using detailed analytics tied to permits and certif- ing single-family homes, half of 1,000 sales expe- icates of occupancy, Apple Valley is realizing sub- rienced annually, from homes vacated by empty stantial growth and seeks a complete count in nester older adult households. Empty-nester units completed and occupied after the 2017 households are discovering the new, modern and benchmarks established by the Metropolitan sustainable apartments are located near shop- Council. Intuitively, these numbers will emerge in ping, services, entertainment and transit without forecasts and counts during the period 2021 to encumbering fixed assets and long term housing 2030 as new households. Metropolitan Council mobility choices. Single and paired households benchmarks are sourced from 2016 year-end are discovering modern housing choices near projections forecasted by the U.S. Census. For transit and the airport can have their "home" in planning purposes the counts of 1,470 additional suburban Apple Valley. Seniors are discovering households in 2017, 2018, and 2019 will be real- new and renovated independent, assisted and ized as part of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and long-term care options. The City additionally en- after the established benchmark was set. These courages age-in-place strategies where accesso- households represent one third of the forecasted ry dwelling units (ADU) with attention to universal growth of 4,751 households, by 2040, sought by design will contribute to achieving the household CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Housing 5-4 Valley . .-5 , • • :r. , — Prillrigai'; Manufactured Housing Sustainable Housing 0 • yLike many suburban communities, Apple Valley Apple Valley aspires to be a sustainable, resilient H •' 4 :','Is' `..,,` 'x`_ offers a place for affordable housing through the community. The City is a Step 3 GreenStep City, 11 . k_+ �,.. ` ' availability of manufactured housing. Apple Valley but aspires to achieve Step 5 recognition. One of Y + I contains two manufactured housing parks, both the most impactful changes the City can encour- i located within the Cedar Avenue corridor on the age is shifting its energy supply from conventional : fI • !?11r north side of the City.While manufactured housing fuels to renewables. The Great Plains Institute es- RIi - ' • 7 provides viable affordable housing for low-income timates that 46% of greenhouse gas (GHG) residents, it may face redevelopment pressure emissions are attributable to the residential sec- Townhomes offer an alternative housing choice that is suitable for first-time homeowners, including Millennials, and step-down over the course of this plan given the location on tor. Apple Valley has become more efficient as its homeowners,such as Baby Boomers.These groups drive market the Red Line BRT and central location in Dakota primary energy providers, Dakota Electric and demand for lower-maintenance housing. A complete sidewalk County. Improved access to transit services are Xcel Energy, have started the transition to renew- network and pleasant streetscaping promote activity and public health in the Cobblestone Neighborhood,above. planned to serve existing residents. The City sup- ables. Still, most of the energy that is consumed ports maintaining these areas for manufactured in the residential sector is derived from conven- _ housing and has taken the following distinct ac- tional fuels, such as coal and natural gas, which tions: are burned for electricity or consumed directly for War . wr' `" Adopted a CityOrdinance (151.50) in March, heating, cooking, and other uses. Natural gas • 2000, that provides a fair level of protection constitutes more than two-thirds of energy con- ' -- and compensation to potentially displaced sumed by residences. Therefore, there is a sub- residents if changes are proposed. stantial opportunity to improve overall energy effi- Construction of multifamily apartments and senior living facilities ciency by targeting the residential sector. is surging. • The park owner must, at the least, give resi- dents and the Planning Commission notice at Dakota Electric is the primary electricity provider. 1 There are more than 19,000 electric customers in least nine months prior to conversion to an- other use. Apple Valley,and Dakota Electric serves more than 18,000 of them. Dakota Electric's transition to re- - I -• -.` - • The resident is entitled to compensation from newables has proceeded slower than Xcel's. The J,,,�„ ;„I :�,}, the owner or buyer to mitigate the adverse n„ +, ' carbon intensity of electricity from Dakota Electric rk impact of the park closing. is more than twice that of Xcel Energy. Emissions • Further, in 2018, the manufactured park lo- could fall significantly in Apple Valley if clean en- cations received a new comprehensive plan ergy continues to become more cost-competitive designation as "Manufactured Home Park." with conventional fuels. The predominant housing type is single-family detached. The Any land use change would require a Com- Residential improvements, specifically, can be more Cobblestone Neighborhood features mixed architecture and high- prehensive Plan amendment. easily implemented than large-scale commercial/ quality landscaping. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY I 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Housing 5-5 Apple„ VaIIey industrial solutions. Small-scale improvements in ties are increasing for individual homeowners,and Infill Opportunities building envelopes or home insulation, furnaces owners of rental property,to install rooftop solar. Even with limited land, Apple Valley can accom- and air conditioners, lighting, and appliances can Wind energy is another alternative that can power modate its forecasted housing growth through in- have a very significant effect. Xcel Energy offers residents' homes. Locally, wind potential is much fill and redevelopment. At minimum density as- rebates to customers who improve energy effi- lower than solar. Like solar, the most suitable lo- sumptions, Apple Valley can accommodate nearly ciency. The City of Apple Valley, with assistance sumptions, Apple Valley can accommodate nearly cation for wind turbines is in the southeast quad- 40% of its forecasted housing growth along the from the Great Plains Institute, launched a resi- rant of the City. Although there is some potential edges of Orchard Place (also known as the MBC) dential program: for local wind production, residents frequently re- and other designated infill sites. Note that Apple sist proposals for wind towers within their neigh- Valley's recent multi-unit developments are closer iii DUgherher plausibleg to 40 units per acre, a pattern that has be- come ever borhoods.A more alternative is sourcing * wind power from current energy providers. Resi- commonplace in the last ten years. Under maxi- dents can subscribe to the following wind energy mum density assumptions, there is sufficient programs: acreage to accommodate the entirety of forecast- Summary of be.Apple Valley Residential Program Results ,_ _• • Wellspring Renewable Energy® program ed housing growth on these sites. Actual devel- wwawo-pn mxe, (Dakota Electric) opment will likely fall in-between a minimum and °a"°`"'"''""""'a"*° �'gc"t4r "'"IP' "' maximum range of density of 2,544 to 4,553 hous- .,o,^°.rA'^P.rertrflih.•h5.n1.ia0.d: • Windsource®program (Xcel Energy) irumlorai N6-18cdk hNlf•d ;19 ifumter DII maw J Ld1W5.'}IdI.d .-:L i ng units. OPurtimi alIrr..tomp dk,t.� L r. .a.. at • Renewable*Connect®(Xcel Energy) '"°"r "'•",war°""""�"•0re Apple Valley will consider the use of the following Tri<rrtlusdhomre rrccmmcd:pQdri lhs'. rlyd on alknk a+•r,Nr mo^4 ., t"6r.0.0%-1,-d Irwin.*^�r6r '^;°".161t^'•40°'s.E.0' ;I MO Housing Needs and Opportuni- tools to meet infill needs: ties Local Funding and Support Mechanisms tools A solar suitability map developed by the Universi- to address this need would include Housing Growth Projections ty of Minnesota illustrates the potential for direct • EDA/CDA Levy solar energy production in Apple Valley (See Fig- The Metropolitan Council has forecasted a 24,900 . Tax Increment Financing (TIF) ure 3.23 in the Community Context Chapter.). It is household count will be achieved in Apple Valley • estimated that rooftop solar could generate up to by 2040. In 2017, the Council estimated that the Housing Revenue Bonds 250,000 megawatt hours per year. Solar potential City's housing stock consisted of 20,149 units. • Housing Improvement Areas(HIA) is highest in the City's south and east. Many of With a forecast of 24,900 households in 2040, the . Accessory Dwelling Unit(ADU) these neighborhoods were developed in the last City must plan for at least 4,751 housing units. In decade or two. Solar potential is enhanced be- the 24 months leading up to 2020, vacancy rates Regional, State, and Federal Funding tools to cause there is greater housing density and there at 1 to 1.5% have been reported. address this need would include are fewer/younger trees. Studies show that the • Housing Choice Voucher/ Public Housing on cost of solar continues to drop. Coupled with po- Scattered Sites or Project Based (CDA) tential utility, state, or federal rebates, opportuni- CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Housing 5-6 Appien valley • Community Development Block Grant Table 5.1 summarizes residential infill potential for uses to higher-density residential is likely. Any re- (CDBG): Site Assembly the City. development within the station areas will be • MN Housing Finance Agency(MHFA): First guided for the SIHD density of 24-48 units per Table 5.1- Residential Infill Potential Time Buyer acre. The Legends apartment development at 45 HOME Funds (CDA) DEN- units per acre, which opened in 2018, is an ex- • LAND NET DEVELOP- SITY MIN MAX ample of higher density results at 140th Street • Livable Community Grant(Metropolitan USE ABLE ACRES RANGE UNITS UNITS and Cedar Avenue and on the Red Line. Council) Infill Sites One of the objectives of this plan is to increase • Low Income Housing Tax Credit(LIHTC) LD 58 3-6 181 320 residential density in the Downtown Focus and HUD Insured Mortgage MD 40 6-12 242 485 • transit corridor areas. Doing so will increase ac- HD 40 12-40 589 838 tivity in the Downtown core and leverage local Other Housing Initiatives tools to address this SIHD 19 24-48 579 924 need would include and regional investments in transit. As this plan is Oppor- implemented, the City may adopt development • Community Land Trust tunity 59 24-48 953 1,986 Areas targets to guide the overall number of units and • Community Development Corporation (Land Totals 216 NA 2,544 4,553 residential density in these areas. Bank) NET DENSITY Apple Valley will consider the following tools to • Local Initiative Support Corporation (LISC) 11.8 DU/ACRE- 21.0 DU/ACRE assist with redevelopment: • Project for Pride in Living (non-profit) Notes: Local Funding and Support Mechanisms tools No deductions were made for ROW or wetlands other than what to address this need would include • Common Bond (non-profit) is indicated on the Future Land Use Map. • Registration, Licensing, Inspection of Rental Available Infill Potential Areas calculated using approved de- • Tax Increment Financing (TIF) velopment units rather than ranges in some cases.See Table Housing 4.2 for documentation. • Housing Revenue Bonds • 4(D) Property Tax Relief Redevelopment Opportunities Regional, State, and Federal Funding tools to • NOAH (Naturally Occurring Affordable Hous- Additional redevelopment opportunities will be address this need would include ing) targeted in the Downtown Focus Area and the • Community Development Block Grant transit corridors (See Chapter 4, Land Use Plan). (CDBG): Site Assembly In addition to the infill parcels already guided for suburban-intensive high density (SIHD) in the Central Village, approximately nine (9) acres west of the 147th Street Transit Station appear to be underperforming commercial properties that are expected to be redeveloped by 2040. As the METRO Red Line matures, redevelopment from existing commercial CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Housing 5-7 APPlell Viii.y • MN Housing Finance Agency(MHFA) Accessory Dwelling Units Balanced Housing Supply • HOME Funds (CDA) Accessory dwelling units (ADUs) are gaining A balanced housing supply meets the needs of all • Livable Community Grant(Metropolitan recognition as a practical tool for providing hous- demographics. Apple Valley strives to provide Council) ing options and addressing housing costs. As an sustainable supplies of ownership and rental accessory unit, they typically do not require addi- units to meet demand for all market segments. In • Low Income Housing Tax Credit(LIHTC) tional vehicle access or parking. They can help 2000, 88% of units were owner-occupied. The re- • HUD Insured Mortgage create additional housing stock in an organic way, cent wave of construction helped achieve a dif- Other Housing Initiatives tools to address this without requiring new infrastructure to support it. ferent balance approaching livable community need would include Often dubbed "granny flats", ADUs can be a good objectives. In 2016, 78% of units were owner- Community Land Trust match for 1- and 2-person households, and allow occupied. There must be a constant awareness • greater flexibility for older residents to age in across market segments to prioritize affordable • Community Development Corporation(Land place, rent out their main property, and continue lifecycle options. Bank) to stay in their neighborhood. Table 5.2 describes the characteristics and pref- • Local Initiative Support Corporation (LISC) Apple Valley's ordinance does not currently permit erences of various housing markets. Two market • Project for Pride in Living (non-profit) ADUs very broadly, but the City recognizes that segments drive housing demand: In Minnesota Common Bond (non-profit) permitting ADUs could be a practical step at some and the rest of the United States, the housing • point, due to the aging population and the limited market is driven by young Millennials and an ag- • Registration, Licensing, Inspection of Rental land supply. If Apple Valley were to more broadly ing population of Baby Boomers (See Figure 3.14, Housing permit ADUs, existing owner-occupancy require- Apple Valley Population Pyramid, in the Commu- • 4(D) Property Tax Relief ments would need to be modified. One way to try nity Context chapter.) Baby Boomers have af- NOAH (Naturally Occurring Affordable Hous- this would be to target one area of the City, using fected every housing trend as they have moved • ing) a zoning overlay if necessary, and evaluate the through their life cycle, including the apartment impacts of this policy after a period of time. It boom in the 1960s and 1970s. Millennials, too, would also be necessary to develop design are driving the current market and will exhibit simi- standards that are appropriate for small-scale lar influence over the course of this plan. Current- housing and that respect the existing character ly, these two groups tend to exhibit similar hous- and privacy of single-family neighborhoods. ing preferences. As they enter or exit the job These policies need not be built from scratch; market, Millennials and older residents generally there are many examples from other communi- have limited financial resources compared to the ties. middle-aged demographic with established ca- reers. While most Baby Boomers will prefer to stay in their single-family homes, a portion will downsize to other choices. Across the United States, the rate of homeownership among Mil- CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Housing 5-8 Apple n Valley lennials has fallen faster than for any other age Table 5.2-Life-Cycle Housing Consumer Groups group. This reality is reflected in the Comprehen- sive Dakota County Housing Needs Assessment MARKET GROUP HOUSEHOLD CHAR CONSUMER EXAMPLE HOUSING (2013). Compared to the 2005 report, the de- ACTERISTICS PREFERENCES Limited tenure duration Pre- mand for rental housing is forecasted to increase from 23% to 30% by2030. To meet demand, the Entry-level home- Early to Mid 20s fer to rent buyersBasic Apartments study fore- casted that approximately 25,000 For- Often single May distribute costs with other Sale units and 10,000 rental units would be con- roommates structed from 2010 to 2030 in Dakota County. Traditional single-family Mid-20s or 30s; In- detached First-time home- Prefer to purchase modestly-priced buyers and move- cludes single and mar- single family homes or rent upscale Townhomes and twin up renters ried/partnered households, apartments homes some with children. Upscale apartments Late 30s to 40s Typically prefer to purchase newer, Move-up home- Traditional single-family buyers Many households have larger,and more expensive sin- detached children gle-family homes 50s to 60s Prefer to own Smaller single-family Lower maintenance housingalter attached and detached; Empty-nesters One-or two-person house- townhomes and twin holds with no children natives,including homeowners' associations homes Prefer to own but may consider 60s to 70s renting Smaller single-family Younger indepen- attached and detached; dent seniors One-or two-person house- Lower maintenance housing townhomes and twin holds with no children homes May be seasonal residents Mid-70s or older May need or choose to move out of May move in with relatives Older seniors Generally single-person single-family home due to health households(widow or constraints or a desire to reduce or move to assisted living widower) maintenance responsibilities communities The senior demographic is large and growing. In over age group will be nearly equivalent to growth 2000, 7% of Dakota County's population was among all other age groups. Meanwhile, growth over the age of 65. The percentage of seniors in- in the number of senior households is anticipated creased to 10% in 2010, and is projected to in- to be nearly double the growth for all other house- crease to 13% in 2020 and 17% in 2030. From holds, given the increasing number of one- and 2020 to 2030, growth in the 65-and- two-person senior households and questions will CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Housing 5-9 Appi%tansy remain: Apple Valley will consider the use of the following Other Housing Initiatives tools to address this • How long will residents stay in their current tools to provide a balanced housing supply: need would include homes (age in place)? Local Funding and Support Mechanisms tools • Community Land Trust • If people want to move, are desirable and af- to address this need would include • Community Development Corporation(Land fordable housing options available in Apple • Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Bank) Valley? • Housing Revenue Bonds • Local Initiative Support Corporation (LISC) • Will economic conditions encourage different • Housing Improvement Areas(HIA) • Project for Pride in Living (non-profit) family and non-family household structures to live in Apple Valley (adult children with par- • Accessory Dwelling Unit(ADU) Common Bond (non-profit) ents, parents with adult children, groups of un- Regional, State, and Federal Funding tools to • Registration, Licensing, Inspection of Rental related seniors)? address this need would include Housing Seniors will comprise an increasing share of de- • Housing Choice Voucher/ Public Housing on • 4(D) Property Tax Relief mand for low maintenance homes and multi- Scattered Sites or Project Based (CDA) • NOAH (Naturally Occurring Affordable Hous- family apartments in Dakota County. (See Chap- • Community Development Block Grant ing) ter 3, Community Context, for further discussion of housing projections for Dakota County and the (CDBG): Universal Design City of Apple Valley.) • Housing Rehabilitation Loans(CDA) One way to accommodate the growing senior •While there is no doubt that the region's popula- Homecare/Chore Service (DARTS) population is by broadening the application of tion will grow older over the life of this Compre- • Site Assembly universal design concepts for new residential de- hensive Plan, the potential impacts and opportu- • MN Housing Finance Agency(MHFA): velopment, rehabilitation and redevelopment. nities are changing. Universal design refers to flexible design of indi- ■ Housing Rehabilitation Loans Aspects of the current housing stock suggest po- vidual units that allows housing to accommodate • First Time Buyer many occupants with various needs, such as tential barriers for the population aging in place. According to County property tax records, 33 per- • HOME Funds (CDA) persons with disabilities or families with young cent of the housingsupply is classified as contain- children. Universal design advocates for support- pp yLivable Community Grant(Metropolitan ing two stories or two-plus stories. Over 55%of all Council) ive housing design that is more or less invisible, single-family homes, townhomes, and twin with the understanding that all users can benefit • Low Income Housing Tax Credit(LIHTC) from simple design improvements that also help homes contained more than 2,000 square feet of finished living space. Nearly 20% contained • HUD Insured Mortgage people with disabilities. Such design is accessible more than 3,000 square feet. These larger, multi- and barrier-free, and seeks to incorporate con- story homes are not matched to future wants or sumer products that are commonly available. It is needs of an aging population. not geared around assistive technology, medical equipment, or special features, but enables these features to be accommodate or removed if need- CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Housing 5-10 Valley ed. These elements are just as supportive for a family Other Housing Initiatives tools to address this with young children or those with disabilities as need would include The following are some of the recommended fea- they are for aging residents. Encouraging life- tures: •cycle housing and universal design for new hous- • Common Bond (non-profit) Open floor plans ing stock will enable more senior residents to • Vo-Tech Building Programs • Multiple stepless entrances are encouraged; if "age in place" rather than forcing a move. A corn- • Registration, Licensing, Inspection of Rental only one, it should not be through the garage prehensive summary of universal design history, Housing or a patio/deck goals, and guidelines is available at: • 4(D) Property Tax Relief • Driveway and garage elevations match the www.humancentereddesign.org. • NOAH (Naturally Occurring Affordable Hous- floor level so vehicles do the climbing Apple Valley will consider the following incentives ing) • Wider doors and hallways for projects that include Universal Design: Maintenance of Existing Housing Stock • Main-floor bedroom, bathroom, and laundry Local Funding and Support Mechanisms tools to address this need would include Apple Valley benefits from a safe and attractive • Turning space of five feet (5') diameter in all housing supply.The failure to adequately maintain rooms • Housing Improvement Areas(HIA) housing reduces the livability of individual units. • Color contrast between floors, counters, and • Accessory Dwelling Unit(ADU) The outward evidence of inadequate maintenance walls or trim Regional, State, and Federal Funding tools to is visual disrepair. When housing is not well main- • At least one bathroom with a curbless shower address this need would include tained, it depresses the values of adjacent proper- or a tub with integral seat, waterproof floor, ties, which discourages neighborhood investment and drain Community Development Block Grant and can lead to blighted conditions. (CDBG): Housing Rehabilitation Loans (CDA) Maintenance is the responsibility of the property •Apple Valley is committed to providing life- owner—either the owner-occupant, the home- • cycle housing stock that meets the needs of Homecare/Chore Service (DARTS) residents of all ages. Employing concepts of • MN Housing Finance Agency(MHFA): Hous- Universal Design enhances the flexibility of in- ing Rehabilitation Loans dividual units to adapt to the needs of vari- • Livable Community Grant(Metropolitan ous users. Council) • Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) • HUD Insured Mortgage CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Housing 5 11 Valley owners association or the landlord. Not all home- mation about funding programs and other re- owners are willing or able to address maintenance sources that can assist property owners with re- • MN Housing Finance Agency(MHFA): Housing needs. For example, some older residents may pair. The City will proactively inventory neighbor- Rehabilitation Loans choose or be forced to stay in aging single-family hood housing conditions to identify signs of dete- • HOME Funds (CDA) homes with less ability to maintain these units. rioration and prioritize areas for reinvestment. A • Rental property improvements are the responsi- bility called "Polishing the Apple" is being de- Low Income Housing Tax Credit(LIHTC) of the landlord. Rental properties in good veloped to launch in 2020 that offers local finan- • HUD Insured Mortgage condition avoid the cost of vacancy and maximize cial resources and advice to assist reinvestment. Other Housing Initiatives tools to address this rental gains. Maintenance of rental properties is need would include expensive and affects ongoing affordability if de- Property inspectors are the first point of con- • Common Bond (non-profit) ferred. Most of Apple Valley's apartment units tact for code issues. Equipping them with a were constructed after 1980 and are in average or tablet-based GIS application may offer further • Vo-Tech Building Programs better condition. New construction since 2010 has insight about the quality of neighborhood hous- • Registration, Licensing, Inspection of Rental improved energy efficiency and amenities sought ing stock and help streamline data collection. Housing by renters in the market place. Several tools are • 4(D) Property Tax Relief available to promote maintenance of rental prop- Apple Valley will consider the use of the following erties and provide stability for tenants. (See the tools to ensure Maintenance of Existing Housing • NOAH (Naturally Occurring Affordable Hous- Implementation section and Table 5.10 at the end Stock: ing) of the chapter. Local Funding and Support Mechanisms tools In addition to multifamily rental units, there is a to address this need would include supply of single-family rental units. Single-family • EDA/CDA Levy rental units assist families in transition and own- ers waiting for down-turned markets to stabilize. • Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Neighborhood homeowners may raise concerns • Housing Improvement Areas(HIA) about deteriorating neighborhood stability or • Accessory Dwelling Unit(ADU) property values. It is important to maintain the quality of single-family rental units to preserve Regional, State, and Federal Funding tools to neighbor- hood character and support continued address this need would include opportunities for homeownership. • Community Development Block Grant (CDBG): Property inspection and code enforcement are the • City's primary means of addressing maintenance. Housing Rehabilitation Loans (CDA) • Inspectors notify property owners of compliance Homecare/Chore Service (DARTS) issues and the steps needed to address them. They are the first point of contact to provide infor- CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Housing 5-12 Valley „ common element subdivisions being managed by expenditures and sustain resources for both ele- Home Renovations- "Polishing the Apple homeowner associations (HOAs) and association ments. Apple Valley is an established community.Approx- management companies. imately 50% of the housing stock consists of HOAs provide a benefit to Apple Valley in that Like the City, HOAs should have a strategic units that were constructed between 1960 and they reduce operational costs for local govern- long-term investment plan. Part of the month- 1990. These units constitute the core of the City's ment. HOAs are typically responsible for snow ly dues should be reserved to finance future housing stock. As they continue to age, rein- removal, repair and replacement of roads, improvements to common property. vestment is needed to address repairs, including maintenance of common external features such major repairs to roofs, siding, wiring, plumbing, as roofs, siding, and windows, as well as any The existing financial condition of homeowner's appliance, driveways, etc. The City has em- parks, pools, and other parts of common property. associations is an internal operations dilemma. In barked on a multi-year street and utility improve- Their primary purposes are to provide safe, se- 2019 statutory changes have improved financial ment and replacement project that leads by ex- cure housing, maintain common property, and reporting and oversight of HOA operations. In- ample with neighborhood investment. This in- sustain property values. formation on the financial condition of homeown- vestment is done without special assessment to leave proper- ty owners better able to invest in HOAs are often challenged to provide these ser- er associations is important to understanding cur- vices efficiently and effectively over the life of the rent issues and working with the associations to their homes. collective property when repairs are needed. Not prevent future problems. Apple Valley may assist The City encourages homeowner reinvestment all HOAs have the training they need to provide associations with the establishment of housing and infill of vacant parcels. Home improvements improvement areas HIAs allowed bystatute if these services. Some lack volunteer resources, p ( ) and rehabilitation should reflect the architectural as Board members typically have a full-time job reserves or lender resources prove insufficient. style and scale of surrounding residential property. outside of the HOA. Some HOAs may have un- Local lenders have expressed support to finance derfunded repair and replacement reserves in the Affordable Housing investments, expansions, universal design and past with state law now requiring better planning. Lack of affordable housing is a national issue. age-in-place strategies. There are various pro- Under-funded associations may defer mainte- Housing is the largest expense for American grams to help finance renovation, particularly at nance or increase dues. Aging HOAs may strug- households. High housing cost is an acute prob- the time of sale. For example, the State of Min- gle to increase dues commensurate to increasing lem for low-income households, which spend nesota authorizes the financing of repairs by eli- property maintenance needs, especially if the proportionally more income on housing and have gible first-time homebuyers, which can be rolled dues were set artificially low at the time of devel- relatively less remaining income to address other into the home mortgage loan. Federal programs, opment to encourage membership. Unchecked, household needs. such as FHA203k, can be used to facilitate the deferred maintenance affects the value and sale acquisition of property and/or finance improve- of housing goals seek to ensure that of homes. housing options exist at a wide range of prices. ments to homes requiring significant rehabilitation or comprehensive repair. The most important financial factor for home- The Comprehensive Plan seeks a housing supply owner's associations is the creation of reserves that offers a variety of housing choices. Ideally, this Homeowner Associations needed for capital investment.The financial status objective is achieved by guiding residential devel- Many newer developments were formed as of HOAs is tied to the health of the housing mar- opment at different densities: low, medium, and ket. HOAs must address operational and capital CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Housing 5-13 Valley high - promoting planned unit developments that Table 5.3 - LMI Thresholds in Apple Valley and the Table 5.4-Affordable Housing Units by LMI group encourage mixed-use development. However, Twin Cities there are substantial barriers to providing afford- UNITS CATEGORY QUANTITIY* PERCENT TWIN CITIES APPLEY VAL- able affordable at 51%to 8,636 41.7% able housing from the developer's perspective. LMI THRESHOLD REGION* LEY** 80%AMI Developers in Dakota County have expressed Area Median Income $85,800 $83,450 concern that it is not always financially viable to Units affordable at 31%to 3,128 15.1% 80%AMI $68,640 $66,760 50%AMI construct units at rent levels needed to support af- 50%AMI $42,900 $41,725 fordable housing, let alone market-rate housing, Units affordable at 30% 1,033 5.0% 30%AMI $25,740 $25,035 AMI or less given limited availability of land and high devel- AMI or less *The definition of 2016 regional AMI for the Twin Cities Unaffordable Units 7,906 38.2% opment costs. Sought after successful develop- ment in Apple Valley offers both market rate units is determined by HUD. Total Units 20,703 with affordable units. **The estimate of AMI for Apple Valley comes from the American Community Survey (ACS) 2012-2016 5-year Source:2016 Existing Housing Assessment(Metropolitan Council) Affordable Housing Assessment estimates. Note that the ACS estimate considers house- Housing Cost Burden The Department of Housing and Urban Devel- holds of all sizes, rather than assuming a household of opment (HUD) evaluates housing affordability in 4. In 2016,the average household size in Apple Valley For an owner-occupant or renter household in any terms of area median income (AMI). In 2016, AMI was about 2.6 persons per household. LMI group, housing is "affordable" if less than in the Twin Cities Region as$85,800 for a family of Metropolitan Council's Existing Housing Assess- 30% of income is spent toward gross housing four. Households that have an income at or below ment estimates that Apple Valley had 20,149 units costs. A household is "cost-burdened" if it spends 80% of AMI are defined as low-to-moderate in- in 2017. Of these, 38% of units were unaffordable more than 30% of income on housing, and "ex- come (LMI) households. Various local, state, and to households earning 80% or less of AMI. Table tremely" or "severely" cost-burdened if it spends federal housing programs are tailored to these 5.4 summarizes the number of affordable units more than 50% of income on housing. Table 5.5 three LMI groups: for each LMI group. Of the 12,793 affordable shows the incidence of cost burden in Apple Val- Between 51% and 80%AMI units, 607 units are publicly subsidized, including ley and neighboring communities. • 132 senior units and 81 units for people with dis- • Between 31% and 50%AMI abilities. • At or below 30%AMI Table 5.3 shows the income threshold for each LMI group in Apple Valley and the Twin Cities met- ro. In this regard, Apple Valley and the metro are quite similar. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Housing 5-14 Appien Volley Table 5.5- Housing Cost Burden (vehicle + fuel + insurance + fees), on average, Figure 5.1 maps owner-occupied housing that are represent about 20% of Apple Valley house- hold valued above and below this threshold. The data LMI GROUP contains 14,730 units, including all single-family incomes. The Comprehensive Plan aims to in- 51-<30% 31-50% TOTAL crease local jobs and transit access, which re- GEOGRAPHY residential, town homes, and twin homes in Apple 80% Valley's GIS database. Of these, 6,414 units AMI AMI duces vehicle miles traveled, which will help im- AMI prove the cost of living, along with the affordable (43.5%) are valued at a price of $238,500 or less, 1,001 1,279 1,061 3,341 while 8,316 units (56.5% ) are valued at a price Apple Valley housing strategies discussed in this chapter. (5%) (6%) (5%) (17%) over Burnsville 8% 9% 6% 23% Affordable Housing Price Point $238,500. In general, affordable owner-occupied Eagan 5% 6% 16% In practice, assumptions about AMI and poverty housing consists of older single-family units or Lakeville 4% 6% 15% depend on household size. A two-person house- medium-density townhomes that were construct- Rosemount 7% 8% 19% hold with one wage earner may be low-income, ed more recently. Twin Cities 10% 3% 6% 24% while a five-person household that earns equiva- Region lent income may be very low-income. Therefore, Approximately one in six households in Apple Val- determinations of affordability vary depending on ley is cost-burdened. The percentage of cost- household size and, consequently, on the size of burdened households in Apple Valley is similar as the housing unit. Table 5.6 summarizes afford- neighboring communities, but substantially less able rent thresholds for different-sized units for the than the regional average. Because household in- three income levels defined by HUD. comes in Apple Valley are similar as the regional average(Table 5.3), its lower rate of cost burden is Table 5.6 -Affordable Rents driven by lower housing costs. NUMBER AFFORD- AFFORD- AFFORD- OF BED- ABLE RENT ABLE RENT ABLE RENT Households which spend more than 30 per- ROOMS AT 30%AMI AT 50%AMI AT 80%AMI cent of their income on housing are defined Studio $450 $751 $1,201 as cost-burdened. Cost burden affects owners 1 Bedroom $483 $805 $1,288 and renters alike, but is an acute problem for 2 Bedroom $579 $966 $1,545 low-income renters. 3-Bedroom $669 $1,115 $1,784 4-Bedroom $747 $1,245 $1,992 It is important to note that transportation expendi- For owner-occupied units, "affordability" depends tures represent a significant portion of household on generalized assumptions about down pay- budgets. In commuter suburbs, this is especially ments, interest rates, and tax credits. For the true. Only 11% of Apple Valley residents are em- 2040 Plan, Metropolitan Council has determined ployed in the City. The Housing and Transpor- that the affordable purchase price for owner- tation Index estimates that transportation costs occupied housing in 2017 was $238,500. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Housing 5-15 ' valley Table 5.7- Metropolitan Council 2016 Existing HousingStock 2016 Existing Housing Assessment, provided by the Metropolitan Council ISI ITS 20,703 TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 19,917 I- UNITS AFFORDABLE TO HOUSE- UNITS AFFORDABLE TO HOUSEHOLDS I UNITS AFFORDABLE TO HOUSEHOLDS WITH INCOME AT OR BELOW 30%AMI HOLDS WITH INCOME 31%TO WITH INCOME 51%TO 80%AMI 50%AMI 1,033 3,128 8,636 16,106 4,597 SINGLE-FAMILY UNITS MULTIFAMILY UNITS MANUFACTURED OTHER HOUSING UNITS HOMES 16,017 4,214 472 0 ALL PUBLICLY SUBSIDIZED PUBLICLY SUBSIDIZED SE- PUBLICLY SUBSIDIZED PUBLICLY SUBSIDIZED UNITS NIOR UNITS UNITS FOR PEOPLE UNITS:ALL OTHERS WITH DISABILITIES 607 132 81 394 INCOME AT OR BELOW 30%AMI INCOME 31%TO 50%AMI INCOME 51%TO 80%AMI 1,001 1,279 1,061 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Housing 5-16 Apple Figure 5.1. -Owner-Occupied Housing at 2017 Affordable Purchase Price iP � EAGANt Owner-Occupied Hous- e' - ing Value Above or Be- Na Iow $211,500 `je • ■ 0, ; . ' S t� + a l 125TH ST W t- -1 Less than $211,500 �. •. " R sa It r $211,500 or More - ' ..-ir A '• iJ '01 Ir 4401111111A Source:Dakota County GIS �c w-�' "' !'F 4 CQ I�JT1tiROAD 38 . - ■aI 'Indicates estimated total 4 •'+��' +a ■ ■ . - ■ *+ market value (land+building) * „ RLws.�£ ' 1 i y - � .. ! for all single-family detached, _4IL_- 4 ' townhomes, and twin homes. 4 ,•'; , J . - + _ al r : k is • a - # i - + . . a 1. -I 1 _� i ` �, .- di N. i11i 1 *; j it w*; 140 HSTW Z ..-...-----)". joi, a %■ r Oce a 1 .. _, :..... •. _.......... 4.. : ..,...., ,.......„.. _•, 4 . - .: I. - + w ate nn* au (111( • - R_ -$1Ci. -14 _ 0 . �! : . IY• �� I o o ' 1:1.. •2. t 1r " -*eel..• will 150TH ST W � _ '11 •� 1+ 0 1 wih* • *rf#I • T ' •a+= 1 t r.L.e.it 14.4 L ; Miles 1 • . - + ' I •• - .'. ,�r ; ff I ' •. f ,. ., NORTH a w. a +J �:..,:;= •--• • 160 ST i 4 .—II - ` I LAKEVILL: CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Housing 5-17 ` Valley Apple Valley Affordable Housing Allo- Table 5.9 -Affordable Housing UnitCalculations cation 2021-2030 2031-2040 Given HUD's guidance, the Metropolitan Council LAND USE DENSITY YIELD GUIDED MINIMUM GUIDED MINIMUM has determined the regional affordable housing ACRES UNITS ACRES UNITS need for 2021-2030 and allocated a share to each Low Density 3-6 100% 36 107 11 32 community in the metro. Table 5.8 summarizes Residential the allocation of affordable housing need for Apple Medium Density 6-12 100% 21 125 20 117 Valley. Residential High Density 12-40 100% 28 393 0 0 Table 5.8-2021-2030 Affordable Housing Allocation Residential Suburban Intensive 24-48 100% 7 175 7 171 AMI RANGE ALLOCATION High Density At or below 30 AMI 221 Opportunity Areas 24-48 100% 59 953 31-50 AMI 118 Total NA 91 800 97 1,273 51 80 AMI 129 Note:Housing units calculated using approved unit count where known.See Table 4.2. Total 468 It must be noted that simply guiding land at higher • The City will continue participating in the Lo- The City of Apple Valley is committed to meeting densities does not automatically produce afford- cal Housing Incentives Account Program un- its fair share of the region's need for low- and able housing. By definition, affordable housing is der the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act moderate-income housing. To meet this alloca- housing that is priced at sub-market values. De- by continuing to spend the required Affordable tion, the City will need to produce at least 468 af- velopers won't produce affordable housing if they and Life-Cycle Housing Opportunities Amount fordable units between 2021 and 2030. To be can't make a reasonable profit. Table 5.10 at the (AL-HOA); making local contributions toward considered affordable, units must be developed at end of this chapter summarizes several tools that meeting affordable and life cycle housing a density of at least eight (8) units per acre or support affordable housing objectives, in addition goals. more. Table 5.9 demonstrates how Apple Valley's to guiding development for higher densities. The City of Apple Valley strives to create, preserve, future land use plan will help it meet its affordable housing goals. A Housing Action Plan, 2021 to and facilitate housing that is affordable in collabo- rative partnership with federal, state, regional, and 2030 and 2031 to 2040 county agencies, private developers and non-prof- • The City will achieve the Affordable Housing it housing and service providers. The best way to Allocation presented in Table 5.7 and has demonstrate future performance is by example guided sufficient land. with affordable housing success during the period of 2016 to 2019. Of the 1,470 new households • The City will sufficiently demonstrate the fore- realized during that time period, 457 households casted household growth of 4,751 households were affordable at 30, 50 and 60% of area to 2040 and,again, has guided sufficient land. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY I 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Housing 5-18 APPlVelloy median income. This is meant to demonstrate A non-profit housing partner, Common Bond, need and being a leader in affordable housing per- that a similar affordable housing allocation of 468 used low income housing tax credits and re- formance among cities in the region. households to 2030 is achievable. newal of expiring project based Section 8 to The following case studies from 2016 through retain 188 units of affordable housing and be Land Use Controls 2019 emphasize how 875 of the total household repaired for future use. The City supported The Land Use Chapter is an essential tool for meet- units of 1,470 was created and how those specif- Common Bond's initiative in 2016. ing Apple Valley's housing needs. The Land Use ically providing the 457 affordable housing units To summarize, in the period 2016 through 2019, Plan guides various locations for future low- have addressed regional and Apple Valley needs. supportive and deliberate action by the City with density, medium-density, and high-density resi- • Case 1 — Parkside Gabella and Galante. The multiple housing partners, added 875 units, with dential at acreages sufficient to meet Apple Val- 457 of the units being affordable at 30, 50 and ley's household growth forecast and affordable City approved a housing tax increment district o City housingallocation. Itprovides the basis for u dat- for the private development of 330 multi-unit 60/o of area median income. The achieved p apartments with 67 units affordable at less these case study examples by using or assisting ing and amending the Zoning Code as needed to than 60% of area median income be- tween in using the available tools for affordability for the implement the Comprehensive Plan. (See Chap- 2016 and 2018. period 2011 to 2020. And, as a way of demon- ter 10, Implementation). Through land use con- strating that the City is capable of achieving afford- trols Apple Valley is very experienced at guiding • Case 2 — Legends of Apple Valley. The City, ability that addresses needs again, and again as and facilitating land use opportunities where the by partnering with the Dakota County CDA, opportunities are presented to 2040. marketplace drives innovation, energy efficiency, supported the CDA's award of housing tax in- sustainability, universal design, and multimodal crement, low income housing tax credits and Apple Valley Affordable Hous- transportation options all with greater affordability federal HOME resources for the private de- ing Implementation Tools in mind. velopment of 163 multi-unit affordable apart- ments for seniors at less than 60% of median This section describes existing local, regional, and Effective Referrals Through Multiple income within a Red Line transit station area state/federal tools which can be used to address Partners in 2018. Apple Valley's identified needs and objectives City government is uniquely positioned to facilitate and the supported Affordable Housing Allocation • Case 3— Orchard Path. The City worked with meeting local housing needs. Other stakeholders a non-profit housing partner, Presbyterian to 2030. Table 5.9 summarizes the resource, City include: Homes, to develo a continuum of care loca- experience and use, and a willingness to explore p when affordable housing is being considered. In • Apple Valley Economic Development Authori- tion (independent, assisted, and nursing care ty(AVEDA) for seniors) with 196 units provided in 2018. many instances, the City will combine tools (e.g., The housing is primarily market-rate and fee funding sources) to complete a project. In fact, • Dakota County Community Development for service driven but 39 of the units are of- developing affordable housing may require multi- Agency(CDA) fered as affordable to seniors with housing ple partners and a combination of 10 to 12 differ- • Metropolitan Council; leading policy and re- vouchers; a mission of the non-profit. re- ent sources to achieve the affordable housing ob- choice source directions through Livable Communi- jective. The City of Apple Valley has a history of ties programs • Case 4—Boulder Ridge/Whitney Townhomes. achieving the stated regional affordable housing • Minnesota Housing (MHFA); resources to CITY OF APPLE VALLEY I 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Housing 5-19 Valley maintain and develop affordable housing Housing Information Systems • MN Department of Employment and Economic A common theme in the Housing Chapter is the Development(DEED)that provides resources evolving nature of housing issues in Apple Valley. for competitive salaries and redevelopment lo- A key success factor will be the ability of the City to cations that may include housing monitor changes in the housing stock.The City will • Non-profit organizations; developers,owners, continue to use geographic information systems managers (GIS) software for compiling and analyzing data • Lending institutions; construction/permanent about parcels of property in Apple Valley. Some financing; reinvestment act strategies data that could be in a housing database are: • • Providers of senior housing; often times as The Twenty Year Road and Utility Update non-profit sponsors of housing Plan; which has the City leading on infra- structure repair and replacement followed by • Area homebuilders and developers; building encouraging private property neighborhood housing and syndicating investment in that investment. housing to fill gaps to affordability • Potential change in ownership when the tax • Equity investors classification becomes "non-homestead". To make the best use of available resources, Ap- • Changes (particularly declines) in estimated ple Valley facilitates successful partnerships with market value. the agencies and programs which are best suited • to meet needs.Apple Valley leads in promoting full Sale of property. access to all available tools and programs, many • Condominium and homeowner association of which are described in the following pages. funding of maintenance reserves now re- quired by state law. • Foreclosures monitoring. • Building permit data on home improvements. • Assessor's data; year to year trends. Compiling this data and monitoring housing con- ditions would provide important guidance to staff and policy makers. New GIS applications make it easier to collect, process, and analyze data; the new neighborhood analytics. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Housing 5-20 Valley Table 5.10 —Apple Valley Affordable Housing Implementation Tools Resources That will Be Considered to Experienced Unlikely to use Tools That Address Identified Housing Needs Address Housing Goals/Needs and Used Will Explore this tool Local Funding and Support Mechanisms EDA/CDA Levy V V V Tax Increment Financing(TIF) V V V Tax Abatement V Housing Revenue Bonds V V V Housing Improvement Areas(HIA) V V V Accessory Dwelling Unit(ADU) V V V Regional,State,and Federal Funding Housing Choice Voucher/Public Housing on Scattered Sites or Project Based(CDA) V V V Community Development Block Grant(CDBG): V V V Housing Rehabilitation Loans(CDA) V V V Homecare/Chore Service(DARTS) V V V Site Assembly V V V MN Housing Finance Agency(MHFA): V Housing Rehabilitation Loans V V First Time Buyer V V V HOME Funds(CDA) V V V Livable Community Grant(Metropolitan Council) V V V Low Income Housing Tax Credit(LIHTC) V V V HUD Insured Mortgage V V V Other Housing Initiatives Community Land Trust V V Community Development Corporation(Land Bank) V V Local Initiative Support Corporation(LISC) V V Habitat For Humanity(non-profit) V V Project for Pride in Living(non-profit) V V V Common Bond(non-profit) V V V Vo-Tech Building Programs V V V Registration,Licensing,Inspection of Rental Housing V V V 4(D) Property Tax Relief V V V NOAH (Naturally Occurring Affordable Housing) V V V CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update ?r Housing 5-21 ' PPle Valley Apple Valley Affordable Housing • Housing Revenue Bonds— non-profit project based voucher and public Implementation Tools in Great- Housing Revenue Bonds, when issued by housing locations. More recently, the natural- the City and fully supported by revenues from ly occurring affordable housing locations er Detail the housing, offer affordable rates of financ- have re-subscribed to project based assis- Additional descriptions of how each tool in Table ing. The City is an experienced issuer within tance and continued affordability. The Dakota 5.9 is used by Apple Valley to address needs is allowed caps when approached by non-profit County CDA also reports the use of 300 explained below: partners in providing affordable housing. vouchers on scattered sites. It is extremely • Housing Improvement Areas(HIA)- difficult to secure federally funded vouchers Local Funding or Support Mecha- again; rather, the effort is to retain vouchers nisms: The 2030 and 2040 Comprehensive Plan recognize the challenge in the repair and for continued use. Each of these tools represent a local initiated maintenance of housing locations with under- • Community Development Block Grant combination of tools to reach new housing afford- funded homeowner association reserves. (CDBG): ability at 50 and 60% of area median income. The Dakota County Community Development Apple Valley is part of the Urban Dakota • EDA/CDA Levy— Agency has administered an HIA program County application for CDBG resources. An- The authority to levy by the Economic De- that has received support from the City and nually about $160,000 is utilized in multiple velopment Authority is provided in state stat- remains a resource when private lenders program areas: ute. The City of Apple Valley supports the choose not to participate. • Housing Rehabilitation Loans (CDA) Dakota County Community Development • Accessory Dwelling Unit(ADU)— • Homeowners at 30 to 50% of median in- Agency levy for housing program purposes. The City has multiple zoning districts that al- come qualify for up to $35,000 each for • Tax Increment Financing (TIF)— low ADUs. Additional zoning districts will be housing repairs and improvements State statute authorizes the formation of considered to 2040. A priority includes as a deferred zero interest loan. Home- Housing Districts for affordability. Both the providing affordable options for extended owners up to 80% of median may benefit City and Dakota County have established family and aging parent care. if a low interest rate is charged and re- these Districts and support their role. Regional, State, and Federal sources are available. • Tax Abatement— Funding: • Homecare/Chore Service (DARTS) State statute allows for establishment of Each of these tools represents the best resources • One of the most affordable housing op- tax abatement as a mechanism in support o tions for low income seniors is to age- of reach new housing affordability at 30/o of area 9 of affordable housing locations. Tax incre- median lace in existingsingle familyhomes ment is the preferred tool rather than tax median income p 9 HousingChoice Vouchers, Public Housingon if simple care, house work and chores abatement as it leverages County, City and can be supported. CDBG resources are School District resources most effectively and Scattered Sites and/or other Project Based assistance maybe available throughdedicated to this annually to retain home- efficiently to make the housing as affordable the owner independence. as possible. CDA: The City has multiple public, private and • Site Assembly CITY OF APPLE VALLEY I 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Housing 5-22 Valley • From time to time on scattered sites, de- able first option to home ownership. due to reduced rates may exist though a ferred maintenance and age of structures . HOME Funds (CDA)— HUD insured mortgage. may lead to uninhabitable homes that are These resources are used in combination • Fair Housing Policy— demolished and new affordable homes with other multiple resources required to In accordance with state and federal law, it is offered on scattered sites, with sufficient improve multi-unit housing affordability at a policy to encourage and support equal supporting resources, may be developed. a location. The Dakota County CDA is our housing opportunities regardless of race, CDBG resources can be used to acquire partner in accessing this resource for most color, creed, religion national origin, sex, and and clear substandard conditions. housing projects affordable at 30% to 60% marital status, status with regard to public • MN Housing Finance Agency(MHFA): of median. assistance, disability, familial status, gender MHFA is the State of Minnesota lead housing Livable Community Grant (Metropolitan identity or sexual orientation. finance agency for the issuance of housing Council)— revenue bonds, the Coordinated RFP for the Other Housing Initiatives: The City is a recipient of multiple grants of addition of multi-unit affordable housing, and Livable Community resources made corn Each of these tools as part of a portfolio for af- direct deferred loans and home improvement petitively available to encourage community fordability, as non-profit contributors, as protecting loans at affordable rates. Several qualifying place-making and when possible, leverage the NOAH housing stock, and used in combination lenders and the Dakota County CDA assist in the addition of affordable housing at 30% to with other tools, offers additional opportunity to access to affordable rate financing. 60% of median income. The City is a strong reach the full range of the housing need allocation • Housing Rehabilitation Loans affordable housing provider; often a top 15 from 30 to 50 to 60 to 80% of area median in- city in the Region that strives to develop in come used to assist lower income homeown- suburban intensive locations. • Community Land Trust(land bank)— ers with repairs and improvements. • Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) — A community land trust would provide for a These resources can be combined when The availability of federal Low Income discounted land solution to affordable hous- significant repairs require significant re- Housing Tax Credits in Apple Valley has al- ing development. With limited resources, it is sources. Homeowners and manufac- lowed both the new construction of family difficult to identify locations to acquire. Both tured home residents at 30 to 50% of townhomes affordable at 30% to 60%of the the Apple Valley Economic Development Au- median income qualify for emergency median and the non-profit acquisition of thority and the Dakota County Community repair financing and for up to $35,000 for naturally occurring affordable housing with Development Agency have underutilized land housing rehab. project based resources that also allows the locations to explore to 2040. • First Time Buyer renovation of multi-units and buildings while • Community Development Corporation (CDC)— retaining affordability. Is a joint powers agency often times used • Mortgage financing at affordable rates is available to qualifying first time buyers. • HUD Insured Mortgage— as a collaborative economic development Homes for sale in good repair and at a In combination with multiple resources, per- strategy for business development that does middle of the market cost offer an afford- manent financing of more affordable housing not preclude exploring affordable housing strategies where a non-profit CDC shares CITY OF APPLE VALLEY I 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Housing 5-23 ` Valley an objective of developing affordable hous- • Common Bond (non-profit)— • 4(D) Property Tax Relief— ing. This non-profit has successfully retained A property tax incentive program is again • Local Initiative Support Corporation (LISC) expiring Section 8 project based assistance being considered by the State Legislature. — A recognized local non-profit collabora- in both apartments and townhomes. Lever- If explored, and offering true affordability to tive that is a community development fi- aging tax credit resources allowed repairs existing multi-unit apartments (rather than nance corporation with a focus on invest- to be made and for affordable housing to be property tax benefits to property owners), it ment and partnerships with others leading retained and remain of service. remains a possible useful tool to the afford- to addition- al affordable housing. Based in • Vo-Tech Building Programs— ability toolbox St. Paul, a partnership can be explored. From time to time, Vocational Schools in Da- • NOAH (Naturally Occurring Affordable Hous- • Habitat For Humanity(non-profit)— kota County offer construction trade training ing)— The City developed a relationship that deliv- and home building products for local place- The City has worked closely with Co-Star, the ered affordable homes locally when re- ment. The City has experience with these commercial property researcher, to identify sources were available. Although not likely to products, in partnership with the Dakota 2,300 existing affordable multi-unit apartments have those resources to replicate the initia- County Community Development Agency. in Apple Valley. This supply of naturally occur- tive, affordable home ownership continues to . Registration, Licensing, Inspection of Rental ring affordable housing remains used and be supported. Housing— available without a threat of gentrification. • Project for Pride in Living (non-profit)— Apple Valley presently has a rental registra- While fluctuation can be expected, it remains This non-profit remains active in providing af- tion program. The Dakota County CDA rou- a stable affordable resource fordable multi-unit housing uniquely tied to tinely inspects affordable housing units to developing workforce opportunities for its res- ensure they remain decent, safe and sani- idents. Resources and locations for develop- tary. At this time, no City licensing program is ment remain a constraint as opportunities are planned. explored. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY I 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Housing 5-24 Valley Goals and Policies, (2021 to a Encourage individual homeowners and own- • The City will continue to review drainage, 2030 and 2031 to 2040) ers of rental housing to increase energy in- grading, utility, and similar plans to ensure dependence and to minimize energy con- that the existing environment is properly pro- Housing Goals sumption and waste. tected and preserved with the development 9. Invest, remodel, repair and maintain all hous- of each residential subdivision or develop- The City of Apple Valley seeks to achieve the fol- ing types. ment site. lowing goals through the implementation of the Comprehensive Plan: Housing Policies • The City will continue to encourage Planned Unit Development to provide for a variety of 1. Work with the Metropolitan Council, the Dako- The City will use the following policies to achieve housing types and flexibility in zoning stand- ta County Community Development Agency, these goals: builders and other involved parties to provide ards while encouraging housing affordability. a fair share of the region's affordable housing. Residential Development and Land Use • The City will promote residential development 2. Use the Comprehensive Plan and other identi- • The Planning Commission and City will that includes amenities such as ponds, parks, fied resources to address community housing continue to review all site plans for multiple vegetation, and similar site features. Material needs. residential development, preliminary plats, selection with an emphasis on longevity and 3. Encourage a supply of choices that lets people conditional use permits, and rezonings. attractiveness are encouraged. of all ages continue to live in Apple Valley;the The City will emphasize proper landscaping, • The City will only permit residential devel- • supply should adapt to future changes in de- opment in residentially zoned areas where mo ra hics and meet local labor force needs. maintenance of landscaped areas, devel- 9 p sanitary sewer, water, and public streets are opment of compatible architecture and simi- 4. Continue to encourage a high standard of available. lar amenities that are necessary for a quali- property maintenance; supported by collabo- • The Citysupports high-densityresidential rative code enforcement strategies. ty living environment. Promotion of housing pp for low and moderate income residents housing along transit corridors where con- 5. Promote quality housing developments that means good design and placemaking in venient access to transportation is available. respect the natural environment and resident landscaping and architectural treatment of • The City will promote the reasonable incorpo- health. residential developments.p ration of renewable energy sources in the 6. Promote a high level of safety and security for • The City will provide an opportunity to de- design of new individual homes and multi-unit people living in all types of housing. properties. velop a variety of housing types within each Pro p 7. Reduce greenhouse gas emissions from res- neighborhood of the City; directing the idences by managing energy use in the home Maintenance, Rehabilitation, and Redevelop- highest density housing to the downtown ment and encouraging wider adoption of renewable resources by utility companies. area or in locations already zoned for that higher density. • The City will use GIS and other data sources to monitor conditions and trends in the hous- ing stock, including ownership status, values, sales, and improvements. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY I 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Housing 5-25 ` Valley • The City will explore ways to protect neigh- • The City will continue to work with Federal borhoods from the negative impacts of fore- and State agencies in order to provide new closure, including the routine monitoring of multiple dwelling units that will serve low and properties and their contacts such as owners, moderate income persons. mortgage companies, builders, or other key . The City will continue to follow the goals parties. outlined in the Livable Communities Act,and • The City will explore ways to monitor and to report performance and update its goals collaborate with homeowner associations on annually. property conditions. • The City encourages all market rate devel- • The City will encourage the reasonable mod- opment to consider making 20% of their units ification of all types of housing to further en- affordable at less than 60% of median in- ergy independence, through various means come. Apple Valley also supports develop- such as roof top solar or geothermal energy. ments that promote on-site or nearby day care, recreation, transit facilities, and similar Housing Affordability services that are supportive to afford- able • The City of Apple Valley will continue to housing. Apple Valley promotes the idea that work with the Dakota County CDA in order development projects should contain an eco- to provide additional "rental assistance"and nomic and generational mix within the devel- "scattered site" dwelling units within the corn- opment itself, as well as be integrated in an munity to secure additional housing for low economically mixed neighborhood. and moderate income persons as qualified by the Dakota County CDA and meeting Metro- politan Council needs objectives. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Housing 5-26 Valley 6. Economic Development Introduction The most significant accomplishments from 2010 • The Cedar Avenue Redline Bus Rapid Tran- to 2019 have set the stage for growth to 2030 and sit (BRT) Service, the first in Minnesota, of- Land use planning is foundational to address the 2040. Examples include: fered transit services to major employers, re- economic development and redevelopment op- tailers, and regional, national and global mar- Businessportunities of Apple Valley to 2040. In this chapter, attraction, retention and expansion• kets from MSP Airport. the City outlines strategies to create jobs; expand valued at more than $100 million from 2011 to 2015 that occurred during a time period • The City has established multiple AAA bond the property tax base; attract and retain busi- ratings for fiscal responsibility and demon more notable for the national trend of eco- 9 P Y nesses and industry; and build the Apple Val- ley nomic downturn. strating good business practices. "brand". • Identifying a development direction for the • The City has embraced education and busi- In 2019, the City celebrated being 50 years as a 400 acre active mining area; guided in 2010 ness development in science, technology, city; was incorporated in 1969, and has be-come as a "mixed business campus" of health, fi- engineering and math (STEM). Successful a major hub of commercial activity in the south nancial and business services with support- curriculum enhancements by Independent Greater Twin Cities metropolitan area (MSP). ing retail and housing, two of Apple Valley's School District 196, energy efficient munici- The City is well served by large retailers, global strengths. pal buildings and resource management pri- corporate employers and smaller niche busi- • The hot housing market offering over 400 orities continue to evolve to becoming best in nesses that bolster community identity and add to sought after single family homes in new class. the residents' quality of life. Apple Valley is rou- neighborhoods and over 1,800 modern tinely named by Money Magazine as one the apartments during the growth period of 2015 "Best Places to Live". In 2013, it was ranked 17 to 2019. out of the 50 cities that were recognized. This . The reinvestment in the core retail area of recognition is partially due to the vibrant local the downtown business quadrants of Cedar economy, amenities, high performing schools, Avenue and Dakota County Road and strong safe neighborhoods. Maintaining a vi- 42, where another $100 million was added tal economy requires focused planning and con- from 2015 to 2019. The quadrants are repo- tinued investment through policies and actions sitioned to complete and be an active distri- that grow and adopt the marketplace. bution point for e-commerce. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Economic Development 6-1 p`ppValley Strategic Plan of Action 2. Unify the Downtown through infra- . structure and design ._Looking toward 2040, there are six pillars to the ;T M The layout of Downtown is defined by large quad- .k. economic development plan. They are summa- ••- --... rants focused around Apple Valley's most import- rized below further and expanded upon in the �I 3! cha ter. ant intersection, Cedar Avenue and County Road 1 * ,,, p ,..tom+.,,,, 42. These wide highways convey high volumes of \ ,.� . • 1. Attract large employers and busi- traffic, limiting connectivity and cohesion. The City ;k;• e : 3 --- ' ness investment to the Mixed Business must respond to increasing traffic and congestion -•-• • ; t Campus in a way that strengthens connectivity and prevents conversion to a grade separation and a freeway-main goal of Apple Valley's economic devel- `-�"" ` = 5., �* I opment strategy is to continue to increase local like environment. Where feasible, multimodal con- i employment; specifically, to increase the number nectivity should be enhanced across Cedar Ave- of jobs that pay well enough to sustain a house- nue and County Road 42; however, some re- hold. Attracting large employers to areas adjacent sponses may be prohibitively expensive and/or in- effective, given Downtown's priority for business to Downtown will counter the effect of out-commut- .• ..h ing and improve the jobs/housing balance. The access. Because heavy traffic limits the potential Twin Cities metro is an attractive headquarters for for "main street" style development on Cedar Ave- :I. -' ' - - national and regional businesses, including hospi- nue, it may be more feasible to make improve- tals and supporting medical offices, corporate of- ments within the surrounding superblocks. Break- ing up these superblocks with multimodal connec- fices, and manufacturing. With available land and 3. Reinvest in Downtown, adapting to a clear vision for redeveloping the Fischer Mine tion will support redevelopment opportunities by changing retail trends into a mixed-business campus, Apple Valley is the creating flexibility for a variety of smaller users to best regional location for these uses. With great take root. The Downtown design guide- lines pro- The nature of American retail is changing.Thanks places to live, play, shop, and do business, Apple vide a framework for guiding the evolution of Down- largely to the rise of e-commerce, many brick-and- Valley already has many qualities that are valued town to a more walkable, sustainable business mortar specialty chains are evolving to offer in- by prospective employers and working families, center. Enhancing multimodal facilities, extending store and become rapid locations of distribution. but more can be done to build on the City's em- the Ring Route design concept, and developing While a pattern of extensive commercial value de- ployment potential and its close proximity to the connections between Downtown and surrounding cline is not evident in Apple Valley, some proper- MSP International Airport. neighborhoods will strengthen cohesion and further ties are under-performing. Revitalization will run develop the identity of Downtown. the gamut from adaptive reuse of serviceable structures, to larger-scale rehabilitation and rede- velopment. The City prefers business to imple- CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Economic Development 6-2 APR Valley ment market-based solutions when possible. The produced, processed, and shared, Apple Valley rived from its connections to regional, national, City will leverage tax incentive policies,such as tax must continue to expand its digital communication and global economies. When conditions in these increment financing (TIF), to prepare sites for re- networks. Likewise, it is essential to maintain and economies change, the City is affected. The last development, improve the design and resource ef- expand transportation connections. Apple Valley recession is a prime example. The demonstrated ficiency of infrastructure and attract additional in- benefits from its regional highway location. The resilience must continue to helpApple Valley with- vestment from the private and public sectors. De- extension of the Red Line bus rapid-transit(BRT), stand future shocks to the local economy. Apple velopment and redevelopment will be guided by with service to the Mall of America and other re- Valley can build resilience by implementing policy enduring partnerships between the City, private gional destinations, is a key catalyst for economic initiatives that diversify local industry, increase ac- business, and other stakeholders. development in and around the Cedar Avenue cor- cess to local employment, reduce reliance on ridor. Leveraging and expanding these and other long-distance car travel, and develop the ability of networks make the City more profitable and create workers to adapt to changing economic conditions. new and added value that will retain our competi- Another strategy, discussed above, is to expand tiveness in the region and the world. and diversify the infrastructure which supports economic function, including a priority in energy 5. Support STEM-related businesses — r' °- .. and workforce development systems, broadband networks, and high-quality "connected" housing. Traditional retail development — national chains and local businesses — connected to e-retailing Regional Economy are part of the business community profile of the Economic development does not happen in a vac- future. In the knowledge economy, the City will uum.Apple Valley is part of a thriving, broad-based need to lead and attract new business investment regional economy. Understanding regional indus- 4. Develop connections within the Twin that advances the themes of science, technology, try strengths will help the City narrow its economic Cities metro and beyond engineering, and math (STEM disciplines). These development strategies, target investments, and professional disciplines provide good incomes, position itself as a favorable partner with key ac- To succeed in a globalized economy,Apple Val-ley which is a key part of Apple Valley's overall eco- tors in regional industry. must enhance and maintain connections to the nomic development strategy. Apple Valley is com- Twin Cities metro and beyond. Some connections Apple Valley is 15 minutes from the airport. There mitted to supporting STEM initiatives through busi- are physical. Others are social, economic, finan- is an emerging effort to treat the center of business ness development, financial investment, educa- cial, or digital. In a digital society, most communi- growth and opportunity for the Greater MSP area tion, and workforce training. cation relies on fiber optics, satellite, and wireless from this center. In global cities, this has been systems. Global enterprise is data-driven, and the 6. Develop economic resilience called an "aerotropolis". For Greater MSP, the ef- amounts of data which are created, processed, fort is a collaborative partnership of medical de- Theand consumedgrow everyday. As more data is economic strength of Apple Valley is de- vice manufacturing, global shipping and transport, Y pp� 9 p and the business cluster strengths offered in CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Economic Development 6-3 APR Valley our region. per capita in the United States.The strongest clus- include transportation and the aerospace vehicles ter is Medical Devices, which ranks third in the na- and defense cluster. More data describing county The U.S. Cluster Mapping Project identifies con- tion compared to similar metro areas. This cluster and regional clusters is available at www.cluster- centrations of related industries within the Twin is powered by companies such as Medtronic, Bos- mapping.us. Cities Metropolitan Statistical Area and Dakota ton Scientific, and 3M. County. Cluster industries are linked through sup- ply/production chains, supporting institutions, and Figure 6.1 depicts cluster linkages in the Minne- Economic development activities should dove- positive economic spillover effects. Several clus- sota metropolitan area.The strength of each indus- tail with regional strengths, such as Business ters in the Twin Cities Metro (MSP) have ex- try is determined by its location quotient, which is Services, Medical Devices, and other cluster panded employment in the last two decades, in- a measure of local employment/production relative industries. cluding Business Services; Education and to the national average. All industries identified in Knowledge Creation; Distribution and Electronic green have a location quotient greater than 1.0, in- Commerce; Marketing, Design, and Publishing; dicating that they have a relatively stronger pres- Performing Arts; Biopharmaceuticals; Oil and Gas ence in the Twin Cities than elsewhere in the Production and Transportation; and Medical De- United States. The strongest industries are identi- vices.These clusters are traded, meaning they pri- fied in dark green. marily produce goods and services for export. De- Table 6.1 provides more in-depth information veloping traded clusters is important because they about employment, wages, and subcluster link- often support higher wages and they induce eco- ages. Most of these clusters saw expanded em- nomic growth in other industries. ployment from 1998-2015. The largest cluster is Business Services, with The U.S. Cluster Mapping Project also provides more than 200,000 employees. The MSP has the county-level data. The strongest clusters in Da- largest concentration of corporate headquarters kota County largely mirror those for the broader region.Other key traded clusters in Dakota County CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Economic Development 6-4 APPValley Figure 6.1 Cluster Linkages and Economic Diversification Cluster Specialization ■Strong clusters above 90th Minneapolis, MN Metropolitan Area, 2015 percentile specialization ■Strong clusters above 75th percentile specialization ■Other specialized clusters — ILOs1.01 —SCR a=95th pctile& Nonmalal Wood 1 Foieslry 1 RIn=20F/o Mining Pioducis Vulcanized —BCR 90th-94th pctile Jewelry . I Male raa &R I a=20°lo Ag ricu hum Liuealock - -- lusters not meeting above Ae10faars& Lg Ming Itp Criteria Oaf en® Fumhma - *Recieaiional Co nalmdon Wale r r 4 Goods Fehing Transport r Medical Video _ Oevicea Perfo ring Prod ucl ion ` +` � __ . t Arlo Oownsheam upaheam ` ommunicalon �1ae Melaka //I ifro lanapanaiionfrif r Music 4114 iP lodno bg Techno69Y . 11)10 Oelra ulion 8 Oownalieam r eGommen� K :. Chia mcaa � Hoapilalilh 4I► Riophame Education lJpsliea l Melalw m oiking A ulooliue ls Chemica • � Timen38 I m neance;. Ape lances -. Pnniinig Food ' .:,MP Leacher aNpea Piodude Proca®ing nviron me nla Financial • Services Sambas III a Paper& Apparel Packaging Teri ilea E led re Power Tobacco Foolrrear EininEinin g Cluster industries support and are supported through cross-sector linkages.The strongest industries are identified in green.Source:US Cluster Mapping Project,www.clustermapping.us. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 1 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update ;.% Economic Development 6-5 Apple Table 6.1 - Cluster industries in the MSP metro City Resources Rank relative Employ- Average Cluster to similar ment Wage Subclusters Apple Valley's economy has several components. metros (2015) (2015 The following components can be viewed as inte- Medical Devices 3 12,004 $77 247 Optical Instruments and Opthalmic Goods,Surgi- grated resources which the City will seek to retain, cal and Dental Instruments and Supplies expand, or enhance over the life of this plan: Printing Services 4 15,670 $55,815 Printing Services and Support Activities, Printing Inputs,Greeting Card Printing and Publishing • Property tax base Information Technol I Electronic Components,Computers,Semicon- • Local job opportunities ogy and Analytical In 35,899 $86,764 ductors,Software Publishers,Software Repro- ducing, Process and Laboratory Instruments, struments • Workforce potential Medical Apparatus,Audio and Visual Equipment Development/redevelopment potential Insurance Services 8 34,971 $gg 719 Insurance Related Services,Insurance Carriers, Reinsurance Carriers • Community image, identity and visibility Marketing, Design, Advertising Related Services,Other Marketing The following section explores each of these re- 10 29,727 $65,346 and Publishing Related Services, Design Services, Publishing sources as they relate to the Comprehensive Plan. 1 Corporate Headquarters,Consulting Services, The role of the City is to foster diverse new devel- Business Services 207,480 $g3 22g Business Support Services,Computer Services, Engineering Services,Architectural and Drafting opment and retention of business activity to pro- Services vide employment opportunities and support a Distribution and Elec- 12 89,550 $83,359 Wholesale,warehousing,and distribution of strong tax base. tronic Commerce various goods. Financial Investment Activities,Credit Intermedi- Financial Services 35,402 $119,376 ation,Credit Bureaus, Monetary Authorities(Cen- tral Bank,Securities Brokers,and Exchanges) Biopharmaceuticals 20 2,304 $79,051 Biopharmaceutical Products,Diagnostic Sub- stances, Biological Products CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Economic Development 6-6 p`PPValley Property Tax Base Figure 6.2-Taxable MarketValue Under the current system of local government fi- $6,000,000,000 nance, property taxes are the largest source of revenue. For this reason, the creation of a new tax $5,000,000,000 base is an important focus of community develop- ment policies. $4,000,000,000 •All Other Components of Property Valuation ■Industrial $3,000,000,000 Effective strategies to promote the growth of the Apartments tax base requires a clear understanding of the Commercial $2,000,000,000 property tax system. There are three components Residential of property tax valuation that influence the amount of property taxes paid. The foundation of the prop- S1,000,000,000 erty tax system is Estimated Market Value. This AI amount is the assessed value of a parcel of prop- $0 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 erty. In some circumstances, the State Legislature limits the amount of Estimated Market Value that can be used for taxation.These adjustments result Figure 6.3-Sources of Change In PropertyValuatlon in the Taxable Market Value.Tax Capacity Value is $450,000,000 a percentage of Taxable Market Value. The per- centage factors are set by the State Legislature S400,o00,000 and vary by class of property. S350,000,000 $300,000,000 $250,000,000 $200,000,000 $150,000,000 $100,000,000 $50,000,000 I. . ii $0 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 •New Construction •Appreciation CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Economic Development 6-7 AppValley Valuation Trends ley. Jobs attract residents to the community. Jobs 2) The Metropolitan Council job growth projections provide the income needed to support local busi- to 2030, 16,400, are already being exceeded. Understanding how Apple Valley's tax base has ness and government services. Retention of busi- Figure 6.4 depicts wage trends in Apple Valley for changed in recent years provides useful guidance nesses promote community stability by keeping 2007 to 2016. While actual incomes are increas- in planning for the future. The chart in Figure 6.2 jobs and residents in Apple Valley. ing, real incomes(inflation-adjusted incomes)gen- shows the components and growth of taxable mar- The Community Context chapter of the Compre- erally have not increased over the 10-yearperiod. ket value of property in Apple Valley from 2014 hensive Plan makes some importantobservations Wage stagnation from 2010 to 2014 is attributed to through 2018. (The years in Figure 6.3 refer to the about employment in Apple Valley: the national recession. year of assessment. Values for 2018 are prelimi- nary.) These charts illustrate several important ° Figure 6.5 depicts jobs trends from 2007 to 2016. 11 /°of working Apple Valley residents have points about Apple Valley's property tax base: jobs in the City. [2014 ACS data via On the Apple Valley added more than 1,700 jobs in that • Housing creates the greatest amount of tax Map] period, with most of this growth occurring during base. In 2017, residential property made upo the recovery from the recession (2011 to 2016.) p p Y 40/° of workers traveled to places of employ- The rate of job growth has exceeded population 89% of the total taxable value of Apple Valley. ment outside of Dakota County. (On the Map, Apartments added 9% of total value. 2014) growth. In 2007 the jobs/household ratio was 0.72. By 2016 the jobs household ratio was 0.77. This • The residential share has increased slightly . The largest employment sectors are retail over thepast 10years. In 2008,the residential ° ° data shows that Apple Valley's employment base ° trade (22/°), education (17/°), accommoda- is slowly expanding. property accounted for 84/° of the tax base, tion and food services (14%), and health care with apartments contributing 4%of total value. and social assistance (12%). (Quarterly Cen- Even as the number of workers has increased,the • Industrial property represents less than 1% of sus of Employment and Wages) number of business establishments has Be- all taxable value. creased. The QCEW reported 970 business es- • Total value fell by 1% in 2008/2009, the de- The Minnesota Department of Employment and tablishments in 2007 and 899 establishments in cline was moderated by adding $58 million in Economic Development (DEED) publishes a 2016. The economic downturn likely forced the value from new construction. Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages closure and consolidation of some businesses, (QCEW).The QCEW covers all establishments re- with some unemployed workers shifting to other These trends point to the importance of using the porting wage and employment to the state under establishments. Comprehensive Plan to guide the expansion and the Unemployment Insurance System. diversification of the tax base and to promote the of existing property. Overall, the QCEW reports to 2017 demonstrate Apple Valley's employment base is slowly ex- maintenance two important trends: panding, but remains smaller than those of Local Jobs 1) Employment is expanding year over year by several neighboring communities. The creation and retention of jobs is an important about 3%to 4% (most notable 2015 to 2019). community development objective for Apple Val- CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Economic Development 6-8 APPValley Figure 6.4-Average Weekly Wage(Allindustries) It is useful to compare economic trends for Apple Valley with other Dakota County cities. Figure 6.6 $780 compares trends for wages, employment, and the number of establishments in Apple Valley with four $760 E adjacent cities. The data represent the four quar $740 ter average for 2016. t $720 Burnsville and Eagan have a competitive ad- 3 a$700 vantage in terms of jobs and wages. The average mto $680 wage in these cities is 50-60 percent higher than 3 $660 the average wage in Apple Valley. Higher wages are correlated with higher jobs/housing ratios. In $640 Eagan there are 2.14 jobs for every household. In $620 Burnsville there are 1.38 jobs per household. Ap- 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 pie Valley has the lowest jobs/household ratio of Actual Wage Inflation Adjusted(2016) the five cities included in Figure 6.6. Figure 6.5-Apple Valley Jobs Growth 15,500 0.78 0.77 15,000 0.76 0 14,500 0.75 tz 0.74 0 :° r 14,000 N 0.73 F = 13,500 0.72 0 0 0.71 13,000 0.70 12,500 0.69 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Annual Employment(4-quarter average) Jobs/Household Ratio CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Economic Development 6-9 p`ppValley Figure 6.6-Dakota County Wage and Employment Comparisons hensive housing policy and transportation plan- ning, as well as economic policy. 2,500 2.50 The Metropolitan Council projects 17,100 jobs and 2,073 24,900 households in 2040, for a jobs/household 2,000 1,913 2.00 ratio of 0.69.This projection would be a reversal of W a) -o to E c current trends, which show improving jobs/hous- 3 1,500 1.50 Si ing balance.With the addition of a job center in the a $1,197 $1,151 o mixed business campus area, Apple Valley is tar- I W in 1,069 geting a higher jobs goal- 19,000 jobs-for 2040. • 1,000 $762 $850 1.0o This goal reflects the Vision for Apple Valley that � seeks to create more local jobs and more jobs with • z 500 r16 PI0.50 wages capable of sustaining a family and fostering greater economic resilience. 0 — 0.00 Apple Valley Lakeville Rosemount Burnsville Eagan Apple Valley seeks to expand job opportuni- ties,prioritizing jobs which pay wages capable Wage Establishments Employment of sustaining a family. Jobs/Housing Balance A key consideration in the planning process is is similar as the ratio of jobs to households.) The Commuting Costs seeking a balance of jobs and housing in Apple American Planning Association recommends a ra- The jobs/housing relationship directly impacts Valley.This balance is both in terms of the number do of 1.3 to 1.7. However, in metropolitan areas quality-of-life. After housing, transportation is the of jobs relative to the number of households, as where jobs are more regionally allocated, cities largest cost for most households. The Housing well as the type of jobs relative to the education demonstrate a range of jobs-housing ratios (See and Transportation (H +T) Index provides a snap- and interests ofApple Valley residents. Locating a Figure 6.6). From a regional perspective, the high shot of these effects for Apple Valley(Figure 6.7). wide range of housing close to employment may degree of variance indicates that some communi- On average, Apple Valley house- holds spend 27 shorten commuting distances. High vehicle-miles ties have less than the ideal number of jobs given percent of their income on housing and 20 percent traveled produces highway congestion and air pol- their number of households, while others have of their income on transportation (for a total of 47 lution, reduces pavement life, and diminishes lei- higher employment.This is more a region-al issue percent). For comparison, Lakeville households sure time. than a local one-many communities have an im- spend 53 percent of their income on housing and A standard measure of jobs-housing balance is balanced supply of housing and jobs. These im- transportation, while Burnsville households spend the ratio of jobs to housing units. (This measure balances should be addressed through compre- only 43 percent of their income CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Economic Development 6-10 AppValley on these costs. In 2016, the average expenditure Development Potential Redevelopment Potential on transportation in Apple Valley was $13,594 per Apple Valley's low ratio of jobs to households is not The City continues to support and encourage the household. This figure includes the average ex- ideal, but it does indicate that there is a ready sup- redevelopment of underutilized sites. Redevelop- penditures for auto ownership (car payments, ply of workers and consumers for expanding mar- ment is largely a market-driven process. The over- maintenance, insurance, registration, etc.), fuel, kets. With a sizeable population, a large trade all building supply is physically sound and eco- and transit. With a heavy emphasis on employ- area, and a large site prioritized for mixed busi- nomically viable at this time. In the short-term, ment in the future land use plan, Apple Valley is ness and health care services, Apple Valley is an while the market may bypass the area needing re- seeking to increase its jobs-housing ratio. Increas- ideal location for major medical groups which de- development, recent developments are indicating ing access to local jobs, along with dedicated im- sire to have offices close to their customers.There a reversal and favorable investment provements to multimodal transportation, will im- are successful hospitals in other suburban corn- prove quality-of-life, resilience, and local spending The Comprehensive Plan does not identify spe- munities such as Maple Grove and Woodbury, but cific parcels for redevelopment. However, redevel- power. unlike Apple Valley, neither of these communities opment and adaptive reuse will be encouraged Figure 6.7 -Apple Valley Housing and Transpor- is located within 15 minutes of the international air- within the Downtown over the life of this plan.The tation Costs port or the Mall of America. To maximize this po- level of City involvement in the redevelopment pro- tential, the City may need to leverage its financial cess will depend on the level of opportunity/need, Average Costs(Percent of Income) resources and increase regulatory flexibility in pur- available capital, the role of private investment, suing job creation and higher-value development. and the City's ability to acquire available proper- For example, the City has demonstrated a willing- ties or otherwise influence redevelopment through ness to offer financial incentives, such as tax in- public-private partnerships.Most previous redevel- crement financing, in order to facilitate develop- opment has been on single or small groups of par- 27% ment of the 400 acre Orchard Place. cels. The City may find the need to consider a change to a broader area where necessary, as- 53% + With its sizeable population, large trade area, sembling parcels and improving place-making and robust highway system, and Orchard Place connection in existing superblocks. tiper o Master Plan, Apple Valley is the ideal location for a medical hub in the south metro. Table 6.2 summarizes some of the pros and cons of redevelopment. •Housing •Transportation Remaining Income Source:Housing and Transportation Affordability Index(H+T);htain- dex.cnt.org CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Economic Development 6-11 AppValley Table 6.2:Redevelopment Considerations(Pros and Cons) vate initiative.A good example is Uponor, the larg- Redevelopment Pros Redevelopment Cons est private employer in the City. Starting wage at Keeping existing land uses viable helps sustain neighbor- Older sites face the need for environmental remediation. Uponor is $17/hour; average hourly wage is $33. hood property values. Physically or functionally obsolete Old buildings may have asbestos or other hazardous ma The company employs 700 workers, having dou- buildin scan roduce a cycle of disinvestment. Redevel- terials that require special treatment.Certain commercial g p y and industrial businesses may have allowed pollutants to bled its staff in the last few years. Manufacturing opment generally improves community aesthetic. meet space was doubled with economic development enter the soil. p p Adapting/expandingexlsting roads and utilities can poen- Redevelopment sites may have greater site preparation resource assistance from the City.This expansion tially be more cost-effective than new construction. costs,such as demolition, regrading,and environmental was partially enabled by an apprenticeship pro- review. gram designed to recruit, train, and retain mainte- Adapting or replacing older buildings and infrastructure Redevelopment often requires the assembly or division nance technicians, addressing the shortage of provides an opportunity to improve energy efficiency and of existing parcels,involving multiple property owners upgrade roads and utilities. with individual interests. skilled labor in a competitive economic environ- By repurposing sites, redevelopment conserves land re- Existing structures and infrastructure may limit flexibility ment.The program was created through a partner- sources for other uses. to repurpose the site. ship with the State.Department of Employment and Increased density at key Downtown nodes supports com- Elevated property values may exacerbate housing afforda- Economic Development(DEED). munity objectives for economic development,transporta- bility problems,increasing burden on low-income groups. tion,and land use. Some successful examples of recent market- • LA Fitness (northwest corner of Galaxie Ave- nue and 152nd Street)was a former used car `` , driven redevelopment include: ' - • Fischer Market Place(northeast corner of Gal- sales lot. uponor • The A le Transit Station '�- axle Avenue and County Road 42)was devel- pp Valley (northeast ' � oped on a reclaimed gravel mine. corner of Cedar Avenue and 155th Street)was • The Cobblestone Lake development (north- the site of a former large general retail store. west corner of County Road 46 and Diamond Workforce Potential Path) was developed on a reclaimed gravel mine. Business development and retention is one piece B1 NES;S MINNESOTA Bml& • The Apple Valley Chrysler site (southwest of the economic development strategy, which fo- a quadrant of Galaxie Avenue and County Road cuses on increasing the supply of well-paying jobs FACT> 42)was replaced with a CVS Pharmacy and in the community. Those jobs must be filled by a U R I N G co M&I Bank. skilled and talented workforce. Apple Valley can develop its workforce by strengthening its skills • Cedar Marketplace(northeast quadrant of Ce- One of the largest employers in Apple Valley, Uponor partnered and expanding the labor pool through the attrac- dar Avenue and 147th Street) took the place with State and local organizations to develop its apprenticeship of a landscaping product nursery. tion and retention of talented workers. Workforce program.The 2017 Minnesota Manufacturing Awards recognized development is often facilitated through public/pri• - the business as best in class. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Economic Development 6-12 ApRValley This example of workforce development used a The Ring Route shows a recognition of the im- Goals and Policies supply-based strategy—create a supply of ready- portance of public actions to create community made workers to match a skillset in demand. De- identity. Also, the Cedar Avenue streetscape and Economic Development Goals mand-based approaches to economic develop- transit stations, done in cooperation with Dakota • Activate the Comprehensive Plan to ensure ment are also beneficial. Independent School Dis- County, have added a distinctive look to the down- that Apple Valley has an appropriate mix of de- trict 196 has become a partner in developing a dif- town. The City will continue to enhance the Ring velopment types and an adequate supply of ferent type of student and potential worker by im- Route monuments and streetscape and will keep land to secure new business investments con- plementing and investing in a K-12+ STEM curric- them in scale with the higher density development sistent with the City's vision. ulum. that is sought for Downtown. • Retain and expand current businesses and Apple Valley demonstrates its relevance by being assist companies with expansion where ap- Image/Identity riate. "suburban intensive"; a recognition that a once dis- pro p Demonstrated good governance, leadership at the tant suburban location has urban, walkable, • Attract new employers which pay above the regional and state level and the central location in bikeble areas in the Downtown while continuing to area's median income. Dakota County for services offers an identifiable be a drivable commercial hub for many. • Maintain and improve the infrastructure sys- positive image that helps Apple Valley attract resi- tem (transportation, utilities and telecommuni- dents, businesses, and visitors in a competitive cations) to meet the needs of current busi- marketplace. Distinctive signs and entry monu- nesses, facilitate future growth, and advance ments signal to people that they have entered Ap- .;,aA►� sustainable resource management. pie Valley. Entry markers improve community Li E r. I • Develop pathways to a workforce in partner- name recognition, send a welcoming message, L y.� ship p _. . mrra1 with Independent School District 196and and offer an indication of community pride. In "• I`1ife ,a �R=� post-secondary options. li �+ ZF - •��� 2019, Apple Valley celebrated being 50 years as a i,,-—. . 10.:-, , - • Maintain a labor force that fulfills the needs of city. Shopping areas (Southport, Fischer Market- 1�� ,u �: �� business and industry and supports business place), and neighborhoods (Central Village, Cob- .. "' I'll+! 4Y 1f !,0°: ' `- ���= --. I .diiirmoso' "%Ma development. blestone Lake) offer a place-making identity to . R,,'dill/J/JJllllJJ�lili' ur..r - � � • Provide a balanced supply of housing opportu- commercial districts and neighborhoods. Subdivi- M f lf nities for all generations that meets the needs sions and shopping centers frequently use signs - _, I + +1 of current and prospective workers, from af- to create place recognition. The City uses con- fordable rental units to high-end housing. sistent signage to identify parks and trails.The City Image is a key component of the economic developmentstrategy. • Continue to foster strong working relation- has also used corner monuments and enhanced Enhanced streetscaping, monuments,and signage help create a sense of place and distinguish important nodes and corridors. ships with the Apple Valley Chamber Of Com- streetscaping to help identify the Ring Route and merce, Dakota County Community Develop- an expanded Ring Route discussed in the plan. ment Agency, Greater MSP and other entities CITY OF APPLE VALLEY I 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update : Economic Development 6-13 Apple. with shared interest in economic development Economic Development Policies ing with property owners and developers. and redevelopment. The City seeks to achieve its economic develop- • Create a medical campus district to encourage • Work with property owners to address unique ment goals through application of the following and facilitate development of medically related development challenges including the mainte- policies: uses such as health services, bioengineering nance, revitalization, and redevelopment of and manufacturing,and transportation or ship- • Actively investigate and pursue opportunities ping supportive facilities. existing buildings and parking lots. to attract a medical center/campus district and • Work with local businesses and industries in • Take advantage of opportunities to use public other medical and health care businesses to improvements andprivate development to en- support of expansion strategies where the p p Apple Valley. hance the image and identity of Apple Valley. land resource is fully utilized. • Engage with businesses that create jobs with • • Foster private investment and economic activ- incomes that can sustain a family. Work with local businesses, Dakota County, ity that supports sustainability and resiliency and the Minnesota Valley Transit Authority • Develop business partners that share the ob- (MVTA)to provide transit services that sup- objectives. jective of high-quality, sustainable, efficient port the economic development goals of Ap- • Attract development of regional industry clus- development, expansion of the property tax ple Valley. ters to Apple Valley. base, match market desires and land use • Encourage and promote the development of • Develop the mixed business campus, Orchard plans of Apple Valley. advanced, state-of-the-art telecommunication Place, to improve the jobs/housing balance. • Periodically review and amend if necessary technology to and within Apple Valley. • Encourage Orchard Place to demonstrate en- the Comprehensive Plan to ensure land re- • Work with service providers to ensure ade- ergy efficiency objectives by incorporating re- sources leverage value and employment-pro- quate supplies and reliable distribution sys- newable/local energy sources, such as solar, ducing. tems for electricity and natural gas and in- wind biomass on-site or in partnership with . Encourage and facilitate infill commercial, in- creasingly emphasize renewables. Dakota Electric. dustrial, and retail development on remaining • Pursue ways to streamline the development vacant parcels to ensure the resource is fully approval process, while still maintaining high utilized. quality development standards. • Encourage and facilitate redevelopment of un- • Review new and innovative economic devel- derutilized or distressed properties into viable opment incentives for application in Apple Val- commercial, industrial, or retail and horizontal ley. and vertical mixed use developments by work- CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Economic Development 6-14 APPValley Implementation nizes that the framework for sustainable growth Extending the Strategic Plan emerges from within, often referred to as organic Figure 6.8 shows the overall structure of the Eco- growth over time. Retaining existing businesses This chapter introduced six core pillars for eco nomic Development Strategy. The top of the pyra- and workforce talent is vital to demonstrate local po nomic development to 2040. To summarize, they mid represents the highest achievements sought. tential to prospective employers. Developing within are: The base of the pyramid represents the founda- established and emerging clusters will help solidify • Attract large employers tional work that is needed to succeed. The highest the economic base and leverage the strengths of • Unify the Downtown goal is to attract new business and industry to Or- the region. • Reinvest in Downtown chard Place and Downtown. Apple Valley recog- • Develop connections within the Twin Cities Figure 6.8:Economic Development Strategy Metro and beyond • Support STEM-related businesses and work- e force development • Develop economic resilience Attract large The following material expands on these themes. Grow specialty user Retain and expand 1. Attract large employers primarily in the existing businesses designated Mixed Business Campus area and workforce Incentivize private investment The biggest economic challenge for Apple Valley Promote Market opportunities for is to increase the number of local jobs—specifically, development and redevelopment to improve the jobs/household ratio. It is not un- common for a metropolitan economy to produce Provide connective infrastructure to support economic activity clusters of employment that benefit some com- Prepare Update master plans for Orchard Place and Downtown m unities more than others, especially in suburban Define supportive ordinances and guidelines for areas, resulting in a regional jobs/housing imbal- land use,design,and economic development ance and complex commuting patterns. Because there are regional forces at work, Apple Valley will Evaluate Assess market trends,local data,municipal benefit through intergovernmental collaboration as resources,and development opportunities much as through competition with other corn- mu- nities. Coordinate Develop soft capital;build partnerships with regional developers,businesses,and institutions CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Economic Development 6-15 Apple" er picture of local job resilience and workforce Utilizing FAR to guide development and model The economic potential of development pro- skills. It could also be used to demonstrate local development intensity posals must be evaluated based on the num- demand for certain industries and cultivate jobs One guiding principle for development intensity is ber of jobs that businesses create and the training programs. floor area ratio (FAR). Floor-area ratio guides in- wages they provide. tensity by maximizing the amount of total floor Orchard Place space in all buildings on a given site. Within these Potential economic development opportunities The long-term goal is to redevelop Orchard Place parameters, developers maintain some flexibility must be evaluated based on the number of jobs as a mixed-business employment center. The re- to adjust building height and bulk and fully utilize they create— both directly and indirectly—andthe development of this 400-acre sand and gravel available land. (Figure 6.9). Intensity increases wages they provide. The amount of public incen- mining area will take several years. Strong sys- with more building space and higher FAR. tives, if they are used to attract new employers or terns of trails, transit, and parks offer amenity en- retain existing employers, should reflect these fac- hanced environment. The Orchard Place master Figure 6.9: FAR Graphic tors. The City will target employers which pay plan captures this strategy by guiding acreage for Floor Area Ratio above area median income,especially businesses open space, water features, pedestrian connec- OSFAR Story 2 Stories �\ that are compatible with existing industry clusters tions, and the supported network of great streets. 1,0 FAA or which represent emerging technologies. Careful attention to preliminary design and promo- Story 2Storles 4Stories In the near-term, the City will work to develop re- tion of the plan will attract larger specialty busi Nmi - 2 0 FAA lationships with commercial, office, and industry nesses to the site. 2 Stories 4 Stories — 9 Stories partners in the community. Conducting periodic The Orchard Place concept plan guides approxi- meetings with the largest employers will help the mately 400 acres for the Mixed Business Campus, —� Entire Lot Area Half Lot Area Quarter Lot Area City identify opportunities and threats to its exist- supportive commercial rights-of-way, open space, ing jobs base and develop local partnerships. This and ponds. Based on historical development with- FAR standards regulate density while giving developers greater de- sign flexibility.The City's FAR guidelines help it project employment will help the City improve career development path- in the Metropolitan area, it is suggested that at density,assess site impacts,and address traffic needs for future ways, such as that used by Uponor,to meet indus- least 40 acres of the Mixed Business Campus be development. try needs. Another strategy is to expand local em- considered for the medical center campus. The Employment potential can also be correlated to ployment data,and the application of data,to mon- Orchard Place concept plan guides approximately FAR, since jobs are traditionally measured as the itor and communicate characteristics of the munic- 50 acres for the most iconic development to be lo- number of employees within a building area. The ipal workforce and local employers. The QCEW cated in the northeast corner of the site. Adjacent conceptual plan for Orchard Place includes a provides detailed data regarding the types of jobs tracts are illustrated for potential medical-related range of FAR goals for each land use. Table 6.2 that are located within a geography,but not the jobs uses;office,hotel,and commercial/industrial uses. summarizes these goals. which are held by the population of that geography. A survey of residents would give the City a clear- CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Economic Development 6-16 App1/a l ey Apple Valley would like to increase employment to vopment. Stage 1 was completed in 2013 when Table 6.2:FAR Goals for Orchard Place 19,000 jobs by 2040. It is estimated that the Mixed BRT service was launched, connecting Apple Val- Use FAR Range Business Campus yields about 75 per-cent of the ley to the Mall of America transit station hub. Stage Corporate Campus 0.25 to 0.35 growth in jobs. Upon completion of the Mixed Busi- 2 is programmed for 2015-2020 and calls for ex- Medical 0.25 to 0.40 ness Campus, about 25 percent of all jobs in the pansion of the Apple Valley transit station and bi- Office 0.25 to 0.35 City would be located there. Implementing the FAR cycle and pedestrian improvements. Stage 3 is Industrial 0.30 to 0.45 framework will help the City achieve the desired programmed for 2020-2025, and calls for a new Commercial Retail 0.18 to 0.30 development intensity — and associated employ- station at Palomino Drive with potential Park and Hotel 0.35 to 0.50 Ride expansion. Stages 4 and 5 are scheduled for ment growth —for Orchard Place and other sites. completion by 2040, with extension to Lakeville. As of March 2017, the concept plan for Orchard If a portion of the site is developed at lower-than- FAR,then the Cityknows that the remain- The City is targeting land use and transportation average Place retains flexibility for further refinement. The space must be developed at a higher intensityimprovements that unify the Downtown and miti- precise acreage for each use and the intensity of ing p p g gate the physical barriers presented by traffic vol- development will be further evaluated in coopera- to produce the desired jobs outcome. The present ume and multiple lanes of traffic on Cedar Avenue tion with the land owner and the project developer. marketplace readily builds at .25 to and County Road 42. Enhanced pedestrian con- In the meantime, these numbers are useful for .30 FAR. Building at higher intensities may require nections across these thorough- fares, coupled conceptualizing a range of intensity scenarios, re- the application of financial incentives and/or mod- with stronger connections to transit, are sought. fining economic development objectives, and de- ifications to City code. The addition of bus rapid transit to the transporta- veloping an understanding of likely traffic impacts tion network has already supported several devel- 2. Unify Downtown by taking advantage offu- and utility needs. If,for example, a 50-acre corpo- opment projects in the Cedar Avenue transitway. ture redevelopment opportunities, using Ce- However, significant opportunities remain, espe- dar campus were constructed to 0.35 FAR, there dar Avenue and County Road 42 and transit g pp p would be 17.5 acres of floor space, or approxi- cially in the four major quadrants surrounding the system improvements as catalysts intersection of Cedar Avenue and County Road 42 mately 762,300 square feet. A typical hospital might staff 2.6 employees per 1,000 square feet. Downtown is the engine of Apple Valley's econ- and the expansion of east/west transit services to Thus, a 50-acre hospital site might support a staff omy. Improvements that unify Downtown, support the mixed business campus in cooperation with of roughly 1,980 employees. As actual develop- greater development intensity, and enhance con- Dakota County. Momentum from transit-supportive ment potential is determined, Apple Valley can ad- nectivity will improve economic potential. Future development and the extension of the Red Line south to Lakeville will eventually influence these just its FAR and/or acreage assumptions accord- redevelopment opportunities can be supported by superblocks as well. ingly to promote the most efficient use of the transit and other transportation improvements in Fischer site. the Cedar Avenue corridor and the County Road Lid Concept 42 corridor. The Cedar Avenue Transitway Imple- The Metropolitan Council projects 17,100 jobs in A 2008 studyof transit-oriented development in- 2040, with only 1,300 additional jobs from 2020 to mentation Plan guides improvements to the Red P Line from 2010 to 2040, with five stages for devel- 2040. This forecast may prove to be an under-es- timate of both need and opportunity. Instead, CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Economic Development 6-17 AppValley troduced a "lid" concept for the intersection of the 3. Reinvest in Downtown, adapting to chang- for higher-intensity development. A TIF district is Cedar Avenue and County Road 42 (See Chapter ing retail trends financed by capitalizing the gains in property tax value that are anticipated to occur through devel- 4 and Figure 4.3). The concept envisions maxim- For several years, the City has prioritized positive opment. The base tax which is levied before crea- izing business access and proximity to the two cor- relationship-building with businesses and has se- tion of the TIF district is still directed to the general ridors with innovative intersection design. Within a lectively used financial loan products, tax-incre- fund, but the increment is leveraged to finance quarter mile of that intersection, a depressed Ce- ment, and revenue bond resources to support new debt over a determined period. In practice,the City dar Avenue would have a "lid" added over the in- development. This will continue and intensify as tersection to connect the four quadrants of the always demonstrates that this increment would not the competition for development increases and occur but for the creation of the district. When aTIF Downtown with an at-grade pedestrian and local various financial arrangements are needed to auto oriented"Cedar Green".This idea would unif district finance period is finished, total property y close financial gaps in the development process. taxes(both the increment and the base tax values) the Down- town. An improvement such as this Some strategies include: would allow for new connections within the superb- are reallocated to the general fund.As a tool that • Financial incentives such as grants, loans, initializes development and ultimately expands the locks. and regional investment funds, often in part-g tax base, TIF is a powerful resource to stimulate nership with other agencies such as the State local economic growth. Downtown Plan of Minnesota and the Dakota County Commu- A structured plan is critical to achieve unified de- nity Development Agency. Downtown Redevelopment Opportunities velopment. Updating the downtown master plan . Continuing the robust working relationship would help coordinate Downtown's transition with with the Apple Valley Chamber of Commerce. As the Downtown ages, there will be opportunities integrated development and infrastructure im- to redevelop or adaptively reuse existing struc- • Providing support to small businesses, entre- tures. In most cases, it is far more effective to re- provements. This plan would expand on the preneurs, and new entrants in the market- Downtown Design guidelines and other concepts use or adapt vacant big box structures, rather than place with the creation of business plans and demolish them and reconstruct the site, which re- presented here, and would again bring key land- marketing plans. Dakota County Technical owners in the Cedar Ave/County Road 42 corri- College(and others as they are identified)and quires significant energy and investment. For ex- dors, potential developers, and other stakeholders the Metropolitan Consortium of Community ample, vacant big-box commercial buildings could to the table as originally occurred when it was de- Developers are examples of supporting part- be repurposed for multiple smaller users, co-work- veloped. ners, already having been active with the City. ing space, community-serving uses, such as med- ical clinics, schools, or fitness centers,and more • Local tax incentives. entrepreneurial market places and maker-space. A cohesive Downtown Master Plan is a critical With additional investment and more substantial tool for guiding transition in a unified manner. Tax-increment Financing (TIF) retrofits, other structures could be adapted to sup- Tax-increment financing (TIF) under a rigorous set port vertical additions. Finally, deep retail could of State Statutes, can be used to support land as- find backroom uses such as a large data sembly and infrastructure installation to prepare CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Economic Development 6-18 AppValley center. Access to the Red Line would support the Figure 6.10: Downtown Parking Lots development of more jobs in the vicinity of Cedar - - k.'`. Avenue. r.� ` _. . The Downtown Design Guidelines advocate break- ., - • - ..-• t, 1, f� ,N I i I ' .------ --�' „ :l ing up the superblocks around the intersection of . I 1• ,. • ../ -•' Cedar Avenue and Count Road 42. To facilitate , Y - ,�*,�� �57 acres this type of transformation, the City will have to ex- 414J , ' r � 4. [ ,I' y 4f I re.zeid r • of parking amine its zoning code and consider amending pol- . • i = y - - are shown icies to reverse the type of Downtown commercial f •• '_ •; 'f�'. aL .� ` . ..., ' _ development which actively discourages walking • - - -- ;1' and bicycling, such as deep setbacks, wide ` : { j ����f 'y 94-37..,: {1 ti /�/streets,wide intersection spacing,separated uses, " : • •-r •r f �f/. F • y a. - '' and liberal parking standards. _ ,, '' _ 7 y�, T._ t " Ll *.-4 ' 1‘ - r-i`*-14-t - ,-, ' • A, / 72.::: , ,74.1: ,../ . ....._. . , ...., 0 250 500 1,000 4,. • � jI'c Feet .- i '''AC. 7-Y.-.--. '. . -' --°-:Pr.. ' . . .--['-.:Yrff-111:.:. -i . ' i -,- i Surface Parking which would increase their revenue and extend Figure 6.10 depicts large areas of surface parking the presence of commercial activity closer to the in Downtown. There appears to be an excess of street. Alternatively, some property could be con- underutilized space, representing an opportunity vented for solar energy production. The Great for economic development. Most of these lots are Plains Institute's energy assessment notes that associated with large chain retailers,which usually surface parking lots in Downtown receive high in- have their own parking and development stand- solation and could be adapted to produce efficient ards. Owners of underperforming strip malls or big solar energy. The extent to which this would be a box sites could be encouraged to lease the outer desirable use of Downtown property is debatable; edges of their parking lots to smaller retailers, nevertheless, it illustrates the potential to adapt CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Economic Development 6-19 ApRValley parking areas for a variety of uses. Beyond adap- 4. Develop connections to the Twin Cities Figure 3.5 in the Community Context Chapter de- tion, there may be opportunities to physically re- metro and beyond,using advances in commu- picts the estimated value of parcel structures as a move parking to create amenities such as streams nication technology transit fraction of total property value. This is one mea- or natural wetlands, improving storm water reten- sure of property utilization, which can be useful in The City has long monitored the evolution of inter- identifying potential for redevelopment and adap- tion. net services in communities within and outside of tive reuse. The City should conduct a parking study that cal- Dakota County. There are multiple approaches culates acreages, investigates daily use, esti- based on Wi-Fi, (faster and more efficient), and fi- Goals/strategies that will make transit an eco- mates the economic potential for these areas ber optic services. A discussion of this topic 10 nomic success include: based on regional market dynamics, and identifies years ago would have underestimated future sys- • Good system design (transit must be conven- some potential sites that could be retrofitted in the tems already realized. The same will be true in the ient even during bad weather and supported short-term. This examination could lead to a future, to 2040. The advantage for the City is to by adequate parking and a dense and well- broader effort to update a master plan for Down- utilize all three in combination to meet user needs connected mixture of residential and employ- town. The Downtown Design Guidelines and con- for the transfer of voice, video, and data.As devel- ment-based uses) ceptual presented in this plan effectively plan for opment and redevelopment occur, it will be im- • Linking key activity areas and population cen- anticipatory retrofitting. Anticipatory planning can portant to integrate the most cost-effective and ef- ters be extended by laying out surface lots in block ficient systems to remain competitive. • Moving riders quickly and efficiently configuration, conceptualizing future building The Metropolitan Council's 2040 transit system • Creating an experience people want to repeat; sites,and identifying conceptual collector trails and envisions the Cedar Corridor as a critical north- well maintained and safe facilities driving lanes with street trees and utilities be- south route, with Apple Valley a key node between . Developing routes and stations to shape adja- tween rows of parking. Lakeville and the Mall of America station. The op- cent growth and draw investment portunities for the City resulting from the imple- • Enhancing multimodal connections to/from Excess parking is an opportunity for redevel- mentation of bus rapid transit(BRT)continue to be transit line ("last-mile" connections); pedes- opment. expanded. A Dakota County study from 2015 trian connections across Cedar Avenue and to found that the Red Line triggered investment of adjacent neighborhoods and businesses must over $100 million in 38 projects within '/2 mile of be safe and convenient the Cedar Avenue corridor, beginning in 2010 with • Augmenting the regional system through local anticipation of transit's arrival. A review of land transit connections uses indicates that there are over 6,000 housing units and an estimated 17,000 Apple Valley resi- dents living within 1/2 mile of the corridor. In addi- tion, there are over 170 commercial parcels with a total property value greater than $500 million. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Economic Development 6-20 Apple owners to locate new and expanding businesses. "'r`• .a,F,, '�-k'. r;•. Furthermore, Apple Valley is already highly edu- r; ;• y ' . ,." ,: :_., ' ' r• cated and offers many places to live, shop, learn ,.. '- and recreate and be entertained. - . . •-- 6. Develop Resilience f Resilience is an overarching theme that ties the ' - - ,4.,. economic development plan together. The eco- r nomic strength of Apple Valley is derived from its -U connections to regional, national, and global econ- • pM�rRn s - '- omies. When conditions in these economies • fi 7, changestandfuture, the Cityshocks is affected.toits To ensureeconomicbase it can, Apple with- - ` tr ESFto: UI "VI -_. _ Valley is focused on improving its resilience. Apple Valley can build economic resilience by diversify- ___ '.,.., • l . ing local industry, addressing the jobs-housing im- �� ___ () _ balance, and diversifying the skillsets of its labor ...im I III aura !NE■ ��■i ��r■ �■■■ ■ i�. - 1I 11I11 �11111� II ,.:i iiilleiatmm�im� !! I] ijiü$ fo_ . *, ,,�,- } FI supply of energy to includeagreater share of solar - and wind power generated by Dakota Electric. Leveraging regional transit investments is an important piece of the economic development strategy. 5. Attract businesses focused on science, engineering, and mathematics. These disciplines technology,engineering,and math(STEM)to often support high-paying jobs in forward-thinking Energy build a well-educated and well-compensated industries.Attracting innovative employers will po- There are substantial opportunities to improve en- workforce sition Apple Valley's economy to remain competi- ergy efficiency in the commercial and industrial The Federal Americans Competitiveness and tive in the knowledge economy. To attract those sectors. Developing and diversifying the energy employers also requires a responsibility for stu- supply to incorporate more clean energy not only Workforce Improvement Act of 1998 established improves resilience, but creates opportunities for STEM as the 21st century response to competi- dents to be prepared. pp new jobs and technical training, and community tiveness. The National Science Foundation (NSF) The City must be prepared to provide supportive partnerships with existing businesses and manu- encouraged academic institutions in the United and desirable career opportunities, as well as facturing. Energy efficiency improvements at large States to increase the number of students nation- housing and other amenities. Apple Valley offers industrial and commercial facilities can lead to wide that receive degrees in science, technology, the land resources and the cooperation with local substantial cost savings. The total rooftop solar CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update V. Economic Development 6-21 APPValley resource for commercial businesses in the City is In addition to solar, biomass can be used as a Local Jobs Access 194 megawatts, which is equivalent to approxi- source of local, renewable energy. Several Expanding the supply of local jobs increases the mately 77 percent of all the electricity consumed in schools, colleges, and hospitals in Minnesota use ability of people to live and work in Apple Valley. the City. Developing a fraction of this resource could wood pellets,waste wood, and other sources of bi- Decreasing the distance between work and home have a large impact. Some local businesses, such omass to fulfill part or all of their energy require- reduces regional travel. Providing a wide range of as Uponor or Wings Financial Credit Union, may be ments. Managing organic food waste is a huge op- goods and services also reduces travel by ena- receptive to partnerships that expand local resili- portunity to reduce GHG emissions directly and bling residents to shop locally.When more people ence initiatives, foster community outreach and create additional energy. Dakota County is looking live,work,and play within Apple Valley,the City will recognition, and benefit their bottom line. Imple- to require organics diversion by large generators improve its self-reliance and resilience. menting a combination of clean energy strategies by 2022, and plans to make curbside organics col- for the business and residential sectors would help lection available by 2025. The proposed medical Land Use Apple Valley reach its GreenStep goals and stay on center campus in Orchard Place would be a large track to meet Minnesota's energy target — 50% energy user that could benefit from sourcing en- Managing energy policies and developing with re- silience is good business and will influence land greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction by 2030. use decisions in the future; supporting a variety of large producer of organic food waste, health sys- tems could be engineered to use captured biogas industries and strengthening local networks of pro- New development is an opportunity to improve ducers, consumers, and intermediary suppliers. (methane and carbon dioxide)to generate efficient energy efficiency. The mixed-business cam- Expanding the property tax base provides the City energy through a combined heat and power(CHP) pus should be designed to incorporate renew- with financial resources needed to invest in ser- system. able power sources, such as local solaror bio- vices and facilities that enhance Apple Valley's en- mass production. vironment. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Economic Development 6-22 p`PPValley 7. Parks and Recreation O..„1 Parks and Recreation are an essential public ��, service. Just as water, sewer and public safe- V' ty, parks are vitally important to establishing / and maintaining a quality of life in a communi- �► . . . ty. The importance of parks, trails, and open • ` space is continually reinforced by studies, \. ' 1` p v analyses, and surveys both nationally and :# �A4 : • _ within Minnesota and the metro. Parks provide "' ,rI Ili f1 �»� �" I economic value, provide health and environ- i { mental benefits, and are the tangible reflec- --"" . `� tion of the quality of life in a community. 4 4 j ill' ; , The City of Apple Valley promotes diverse -;" — �` "`'E ' ; recreational opportunities, services, facilities, ' ' i--• — • ' . f':', r " and trails through the parks and recreation s department. This system, along with numer- _ ous programs and collaborations with local youth sports associations, civic groups, the — . . _ •• _ school districts and local non-profits, greatly _ • ,r contributes to the quality of life for residents in - y 's '•" ' the City of Apple Valley. Adapting to a chang- = �J -_ '' ; ing population and parks system's needs are _ ' = --n--- crucial to the success of such a park system. ill CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Parks and Recreation 7-1 Appian Parks and Recreation The City of Apple Valley is updating its Parks Mas- ,,, s -_ .: .:-_-- :_i ,_ .0.;f,ri.w+••• •i.• - •--. ter Plan to provide a clear vision that guides deci- ~= s� wre �` Y • sion making into the future. This plan will include . . ,� w recommendations regarding the development and _ redevelopment of existing parks, trails, and recre- _ 1 - —.„, fir i ational opportunities. I The following guiding principles were developed y '.—. in previous versions of the Comprehensive Plan �...w..'''''''_ and continue to be used by Apple Valley to guide lam! 1 1 !l T r.-r 1--- ----- development of the park system: __ _ I'! . • Creating parks that provide people with places _ it /_r I H H .\—Ali k to gather and play. 1 Distributingparks throughout the City. `���— • g Quarry Point Park was opened in 2010. • Connecting parks and neighborhoods with sidewalks and trails. • Effectively providing information to residents and community. and visitors that will elevate awareness of the park • Matching facilities with the full spectrum of and recreation system and services. The Apple Valley Parks and Recreation Master ages, abilities and economic status. Creating a • Developing a park and recreation system that Plan includes an in-depth analysis of the park system that serves all residents. is innovative. system, including: Current Park System, Changes • Providing a wide range of indoor and and Trends Analysis, Community Vision, Level of outdoor recreation facilities. Guiding principles will create a strong foundation for meeting future needs. Recommendations and Service Analysis, Program Assessment, Bench- • Collaborating with other parties to coordinate mark Analysis, and a Frameworks Plan. strategies for achieving these principles are de- the delivery of services to make effective use of financial resources. fined in the Frameworks Plan. The following was adapted as an Executive Using parks as a tool to control flooding, help Summary of the Apple Valley Parks and Recre- • Plan and Process ation Master Plan. The full plan should be re- preserve the quality of the surface water, re- plenish the ground water supply, reduce air pol- The Apple Valley Parks and Recreation Master viewed to understand the breadth of work and full lution and preserve natural resources. Plan is lead by the Park and Recreation Depart- analysis that was completed. Additionally, two new guiding principles were de- ment, with input from the Park and Recreation veloped that reflect desires set forth by stakehold- Committee, the Apple Valley Planning Commis- Executive Summaryers, staff and residents: sion, and residents and stakeholders from the The City of Apple Valley has an extensive park CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update :{:: Parks and Recreation 7-2 App►ialleyh ey system with over 900 acres of parkland, 75 miles holder input, regional context/experience and pro- Community Parks of trails and a variety of recreational facilities. The jected population changes shown in Table 7.1. Community parks serve a large population, in the Park system provides numerous amenities for the case of Apple Valley, a quarter to all of the City. residents of Apple Valley including: The following identifies the current system and These parks are often areas of intensive recrea- projected needs based off of the Level of Service tion use. They often provide several different are- 13 Picnic Shelters Recommendations: 40 Ball Diamonds as of recreation, such as several ball fields, sev- eral picnic shelters, one or two playground areas, 24 Multi-Purpose Fields Neighborhood Parks 25.5 Basketball Courts (incl. half courts) Neighborhood parks are parks that serve approx- and open space areas. 30 Tennis Courts innately a half-mile radius, and are intended to be Apple Valley has developed some strong com- 10 Pickleball Courts parks that the surrounding population can easily munity parks, and no additional development of 53 Playgrounds walk to. Examples are Cedar Isle or Keller Parks. this type of park is needed - both currently and 21 Sand Volleyball Courts They provide basic recreation, such as a play- through 2030. Johnny Cake Skate Park ground and possibly a small practice field, picnic Kelley Splash Pad Red- shelter, or similar. They may sometimes be large Special Use Parks wood Pool enough to accommodate several fields and a sig- Special use parks provide a specialized or single Apple Valley Family Aquatic Center nature amenity, such as a small skate park or use recreational amenity, such as golf, nature Sports Arena splash pad area. centers, and aquatic centers. Examples for Apple Hayes Park Arena Valley include Valleywood Golf Course and Apple A majority of Apple Valley's existing parks are in Valley Family Aquatic Center. Senior Center this classification with approximately 346 acres of Teen Center parkland. However, given the rapid and consistent While no additional special use parks are needed Community Center growth of Apple Valley, an additional 17 acres of currently, an additional 20 acres will be needed in Valleywood Golf Course neighborhood parks will be needed by 2020.This 2020 and 57 acres will be needed by 2030. Table 7.2 -7.3 shows the current parks and facili- need will grow as the population grows, reaching ties in the Apple Valley Parks System approximately 42 additional acres by 2030. Total Developed Park Acreage Needed There is additional park acreage needed for both Level of Service Recommendations Neighborhood Parks and Special Use Parks. Park Table 7.1 — Estimated Population acreages are calculated based on the assumption As part of the master planning process, a Level of that standards are met each year. In addition, Service Analysis was completed to provide rec- 2017 Estimated Population 51,000 some park types can function as others, so the ommendations based on current facility inventory, 2020 Estimated Population 55,500 total is not a simple sum of all park acreage needs. other providers (e.g. ISD 196, Dakota County), 2030 Estimated Population 59,200 Total park acreage needed by year is shown Fig- park and facility standards, community or stake- ure 7.3. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Parks and Recreation 7-3 AppValley Figure 7.1 —Apple Valley Parks l L � Laeann Hills Apple Valley Parks rk s 1. Park 2. Apple Grove Park y Regional !? 3. Apple Ponds Park 4. Apple Valey East Park 4 MINNESO=AZOO 5. Belmont Park ___41[111 6. Bridge Oaks Perk 34 W i GrHhrw12 7. Carringlon Park 22 R Vial 3. Carrolhvoad Park S 9. Cedar IIe Park C. Fawnp _ rme Malta d, Fkbje 10_ Delaney Park +F 11. Diamond Path Park ir [ .a 12_ duchess Park 13_ Faith Park � � 14_ Farquar Park 1hCANIAREWSRD r� � Findlay Applolallay Ilk ... f . o� 15_ Finy park 16_ Fred J Largen Park iipi.„. Lt r 17_ Gelaxie Park 18_ Green Leaf Park smog a • i9_ Greening Park 20_ Hagerneister Park A,rraGret - 4 01 - 14 -4Si WTI4ST 21_ Hayes Arena aka I' E Ia��G 22_ Heritage Park H4■ ��!!"""""������'�a.rwo-1 23_ Huntiigton Park 1plip Apple Valley g 15 * to-hoof 24 24_ Johnny Cake Ridge Park East - 25_ Johnny Cake Ridge Park West :eaa•Val lay Laarnln0 Calla I ernpW ..h 211_ Keley Perk `^°0r 27_ Lac Lavon Park x f I 1 28_ Lebanon Cemetery e a f �l I I� r 29_ Long Lake Park [ $ it 30. Longri a Park 1/ 2 — 1 ll 31_ Moeller Park 37 42 1&)1I Si I r IEU liB 7d+dF#k$T YF K. Newell Park 22 33_ Nordic Park Zi 34_ Palomino Park 36li 0 35_ Pennock Park scultmew 11111 Barratry - M. Quarry Point Park row. 19, l2t 37_ Redwood Park # 38_ Regatta Perk 1 11t t- i ilkLail '3'-±- 1---Kt-1.1:- 111".. 39_ Senn Park LI 40_ SemmerField Park 41_ TintahPark r . 1—i-r ` 1 42_ Valley Middle Park 1 cirr i¢T IliI 43_ Velleywood Golf Course 44_ Wallace Perk 45_ Wildhrocd Park CITYOFAPPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Parks and Recreation 7-4 APPValley Figure 7.2 —Apple Valley Trails & Sidewalks Apple Valley Trails & Sidewalks 1". Leharon Pi r iiiii: Regional Park I MIT Sidewalks 1 Paved Trails u214kii ...1 • r++iirr� rn goo .. _ _ A ,., ••• Unpaved Trails / 1 1 \si c-D . .. .... - North Creek Greenway - Regional Trail FaA Lebanon Hills-Lake Marion - ' • Regional Trail Search - -_ .. r . : IN - Comdor --- 1 1 - At* .inw LJ111 r I.:, r I lief . , ii. . 1 IL_ Jlrynat J , ...,, ._ T I. [Th_ l r 1 , ! _ L tilirl --Th /1 I 7 \ - , II di :Lois . • 1_— II _,,, �1� __Iimalti L,1 - ow. tri,-a ;1%..-0,„. "21. ii I ll.M11_ ` ifinii.,_ • op:....,.,,...:,iali. Las La Non _ _ ,. ,___,..,..„..„__• - - - — - ram] CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update s ; Parks and Recreation 7-5 Ap'Valley Table 7.2 - Current Inventory (1/2) Community Parks 370.40 Alimagnet Park 85.00 0.12 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 Disc golf,nature environment Cobblestone Lake Park 25.80' 3.19 1 0.5 2 1 1 Adult fitness equipment Farquar Lake Park 11.00 0.38 3 1 2 1 Kelley Park 5.60 0.11 2 1 1 1 1 Covered Stage RedwoodPark 12.00 0.76 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 1 Community Center,outdoor pool,off-street parking,flower gardens Johnny Cake Ridge Park(East) 42.00 0.30 1 6 3 1 2 2 1 Additional acres at neighboring Scott Highland Elementary School Johnny Cake Ridge Park(West) 125.00 1.10 1 9 10 2 8 1 1 2 1 1 Football,Softball&Baseball,Off-Street Parking,Teen Center,Family Aquatic Center Quarry Point Athletic Complex 32.00 0.47 1 4 4 Valley Middle Park 7.00 0.12 5 2 4 1 1 1 40 Additional acres owned by school district;off-street parking and track Community Ctr/Hayes 25.00 0.28 6 4 4 2 6 1 6 2 Neighborhood Parks 330.90 Apple Grove Park 11.60 0.24 Apple Ponds Park 11.00 0.02 1 1 0.5 ' Apple Valley East Park 11.60 0.31 1 0.5 1 1' 1 1 1 Sledding Hill Belmont Park 3.40 0.15 . .Briar Oaks Park 16.40 0.34 Carrollwood Park 5.10 0.18 Cedar Isles Park 8.50 0.32 0.5 Cedar Knolls Park 10.30 0.09 2 Chaparral Park 9.70 0.14 1 Natural area Cortland 11.90 Delaney Pak 7.90 0.44 ' ' 1 3 0,5 2 Diamond Path Park 20.30 1.92 Duchess Park 3.00 1 0.5 Robert L.Erickson 4.00 Faith Park 11.00 0.48 1 0.5 2 Findlay Park 3.60 0.15 Galaxie Park 12.60 0.13 1 0.5 Greening Park 3.40 0.03 1 1 Greenleaf Park 15.00 0.95 : 1 1 2 2 2 Half Courts Hagemeister Park 8.70 0.24 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 Half Courts Heritage Park 3.60 1 Huntington Park 10.30 0.31 Keller Park 3.00 0.03 Lac Lavon Park 5.50 0.27 'Largen Park 7.00 0.14 1 0.5 Long Lake Park 5.40 0.62 Langridge Park 15.00 0.09 1 2 Moeller Park 12.60 1.32 1 1 0.5 1 Newell 1.50 1 Nordic Park 7.20 0.16 1 Palomino Park 4.60 0.34 ' 1 ' 2 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Parks and Recreation 7-6 Apple„ able 7.3 - Current Inventory (2/2) I! Pennock Park 3.201 0.18 1 2 Regatta Park 9.70 1 1 0.5 Scott Park 8.00 2 1 Archery Summerfield Park 7.10 0.31 Sunset Park 5.10 0.21 Tintah Park 21.40 0.79 1 1 41 0.5 WallacePark 3.50 0.09 1 0.51 Wildwood Park 8.20 0.25 2 2 Ipecial Use Parks&Facilities 190 00 Community Center(49,354 sD 4 Indoor gym space,arts and crafts,preschool room,exercise room,game room Senior Center(20,003sD Family Aquatic Center 1 1 1 Lazy river,slides,zero depth entry Teen Center(4,160 sD At Johnny Cake Ridge Park(West) Hayes Field&Arena(30,377 sD Indoor ice arena and sports field Indoor Sports Arena(32,000 sD Indoor ice arena Redwood Center&Pool(5,176 sD 1 Outdoor pool and wading pool ValleywoodMunicipal Golf Course(16,000 SD 190.00 21 1 18 hole course City Trails 56.68 4.10 I Sub Total•City 891.30 74 75 4 101 131 501 391 251 321 101 541 231 11 11 21 31 71 71 101 121 16 Other Providers I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Apple ValleyHigh School(ISO 196) 75.60 I I I 41 21 1 21 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 Track Cedar Park Elementary School(ISO 196) 15.40 Dakota Ridge School(ISO 196) 7.70 _ Diamond Path School(ISO 196) 3.40 2 Falcon Ridge Middle School(ISO 196) 28.80 I I 3 I I I 1 Track and off-street parking Greenleaf Elementary School(ISO 196) 30.00 I I 1 I I I Scott Highlands Middle School(ISO 196) 35.60 I I 3 2 6 I I I Track and off-street parking Valley Middle School(ISO 196) 31.20 I I 7 I I I Track and off-street parking Westview Elementary School(ISO 196) I I 2 2 I I I Sub Total- 196227 70 6 00 8.00 3.00 --- Lebanon Hillsis Regional Park(Dakota County) 320 00 31.50 3 32 Trails,mountainbiking,camping,swimmingbeach,visitor's center,naturalareas North Creek Greenway 5 00 Total 11439 00I 111.251 7.42 113I 721 451 251 401 101 571 231 11 1 21 I I Information shown for Other Providers is based off of information available to the City at the time of this report,and is not regarded as final. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Parks and Recreation 7-7 Ap'Valley Trails and Connections Sidewalks Street trails are 8-foot bituminous trails built along Sidewalks are intended to support pedestrians in collector streets and county roads. It will continue Trails and sidewalks are vital in parts of the corn- residential neighborhoods and commercial dis- to be the City's policy to construct bituminous trails munity. They serve as a means of transportation, tricts. Sidewalks allow people to move by foot on both sides of all county roads and community and are an important recreational component. (walk, jog) within neighborhoods and to other collector streets, where the terrain and topography These facilities: parts of the community - parks, schools, public permit. Both park and street trails are multi-use • Allow people to move safely throughout Ap- facilities and shopping. Sidewalks provide a place and intended to accommodate both pedestrians ple Valley without a car. for children to safely travel by bicycle or scooter. and bicycles. The design of sidewalks (narrower width, individ- • Connect neighborhoods with parks, schools ual concrete sections) make them poorly suited to The extensive trail system in Apple Valley and and other community facilities. adult bicycle use. the surrounding region is one of the best in • Promote healthy and active lifestyles. the nation. As the population ages, sidewalks may receive • Encourage sustainability by facilitating non- greater use by motorized and non-motorized Apple Valley and its surrounding communities vehicular travel. wheelchairs and similar devices. Sidewalks also have a strong, connected trail system. The region • Serve a wide range of individual and serve social and recreational functions. They pro- is a leader in trails nationwide, and no additional household needs. mote social interaction in neighborhoods and pro- paved trail mileage is needed to meet the stand- vide a safe place for young children to play near ard, which is already higher than most of the • Contribute to the social fabric and character their home. United States, through 2030. of Apple Valley. • Provide youth with the means for independent Paved Trails Unpaved Trails travel and exploration. Paved trails can include either asphalt (bitumi- Unpaved, or natural surface trails are usually dedi- nous)Figure 7.3 —Additional Acreage Needed surface, or wide, concrete sidewalks. These cated to pedestrian, mountain biking, or horse trail trails are often ADA accessible and usually can use during the summer months. In winter, these 49 accommodate a range of activities, from pedestri- trails can be designated for winter hiking, snow- I ans and joggers to bicyclists and rollerbladers. shoeing, or cross-country skiing, depending on These trails may be plowed or groomed in winter, their characteristics and grooming schedule. depending on the designated use. There are two types of paved trails in Apple Valley. Within the city limits of Apple Valley, there is cur- rently a deficit of 5 miles of unpaved trail, which Park trails are bituminous trails in parks and open will increase to 7 miles by 2030. spaces. These trails connect the parks adjacent 0 0 streets and neighborhoods. Park trails also allow 2017 2020 2030 for movement through parks and open spaces. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Parks and Recreation 7-8 Apple. lley Future Regional Trails Table 7.4-Outdoor Facility Needs North Creek Greenway Regional Trail This planned trail will cover 14 miles through four OUTDOOR FACILITY 2017 2020 2030 cities and towns, connecting Lebanon Hills Re- Picnic shelter1Pavilion s 8 10 gional Park and the Minnesota Zoo all the way to Ball Fields -- -- -- the Vermillion River Wildlife Management Area. Multi-Purpose Fields — — — Throughout the length of the North Creek Green way; schools, parks, lakes, and open spaces will BasknrbalI Courts — — — be better connected via a recreational spine. Five Tennis Courts miles of this trail are within City of Apple Valley Plokleball Courts — 1 2 limits. • Playgrounds — — — Lebanon Hills - Lake Marion Regional Trail • Through a planning process led by Dakota Coun- Sand Volleyball • -- -- -- ty, the Lebanon Hills - Lake Marion Regional Skate Parks — — — Trail will run through Apple Valley and Burnsville to connect Lebanon Hills Regional Park, the Splash Pads 1 2 2 North Creek Greenway Regional Trail, and the Outdoor Pool -- -- -- Lake Marion Greenway Regional Trail. amenities remain. In addition, while Apple Valley tional Neighborhood Parks, which often incorpo- Outdoor Facilities currently exceeds the standard for outdoor pools, it rate this type of amenity. Pickleball is another Outdoor Facilities include ball fields, courts, play is recommended that a study of the operational area where Apple Valley currently excels, but equipment, and other park infrastructure that is cost of the Redwood Pool be completed to deter- with the aging population, increasing popularity geared toward a particular sport or activity. Table mine its cost versus benefit to the community. of the sport, and influx of non-residents using 7.4 shows the need for each amenity by year. Indoor Facilities Apple Valley's facilities, this is an area for addi- IndoorA le Valleyhas adequate outdoor facilities and facility space includes the Community Cen- pp q tional capacity in the coming years. amenities in most areas. The one focal point for While all standards are adequate in terms of quan- ter, Teen Center, Redwood, and Senior Center, additions should be in picnic shelters and pavil- tity, care should be given to the maintenance of along with small areas of indoor space within the ions. This trends along with the need for addi- current amenities to ensure the quality of these larger community parks. Currently, Apple Valley CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Parks and Recreation 7-9 Ap'Valley has over 135,000 square feet of indoor space, and Peer agencies as it applies to efficiency and effec- • At approximately $148 of operational ex- this exceeds the standard by about a third. No tiveness practices. The benchmark assessment is or- pense per resident, the City expends more additional indoor space is recommended. How- ganized into specific categories and questions to ob than all other agencies participating in the ever, improvements and updates to current spac tain data that offers an encompassing view of each benchmark median and nearly double the es, including the Community Center, are needed. system's operating metrics in comparison to the City national median. Consideration for winter amenities, such as an of Apple Valley. • Assessing revenue generation, Apple Val- indoor playground, and the development of a mul- ley is also leading the benchmark by gener- ti-generational, family-based community center, The City parks system compares favorably ating $66 of non-tax revenue per resident rather than dedicated centers to certain age against benchmark communities and best which is also well above the National Rec- practices. reation Park Association (NRPA)median. groups, is also recommended. A feasibility study and business plan for the renovation of the genera- The benchmark agencies include: Burnsville, Eagan, • Due to its strong level of revenue current Hayes Complex should be conducted to Lakeville, Plymouth and West Des Moines. Infor- determine tion, Apple Valley ranks first among the best future use of those facilities. mation gathered includes: overview (population, benchmark agencies with a cost recovery level of 45%. This is well above best prac- Program Analysis density, etc.), park acreage, trail mileage, staffing tice nationwide and speaks highly of the levels, operating budgets, non-tax revenues, opera- overall sustainability of the Department. As part of the master planning process, a Recrea- tional cost recovery, capital budget, program partici- tion Program Assessment was completed. The pation, and indoor space. The following are key find- • Apple Valley is reporting a 3-year capital assessment offers an in-depth perspective of investment average that ranks last among P P P ings pertaining to the City of Apple Valley that were peer agencies. Although it is investing at a program and service offerings and helps identify highlighted in the benchmark analysis: much lower level, the annual capital budg- strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities regard- ing programming. The assessment also assists i • Apple Valley has the lowest total park acres et is experiencing an increasing trend more n identifying core programs, program gaps within owned or managed among peer agencies, but recently. the community, key system-wide issues, areas of has the second highest percentage of developed • On average, residents in Apple Valley are improvement, and future programs and services acreage. participating at a higher rate than all other for residents. • In terms of staffing, Apple Valley has a signifi- benchmark communities, as each resident cantly larger workforce than all other benchmark participates nearly six times per year in The analysis can be reviewed in full in the Apple communities when compared to the population programs offered through the Department. Valley Parks and Recreation Master Plan. served, with 20 FTEs (full-time equivalent) per • The City is providing the third highest Benchmark Analysis 10,000 residents. This can be partially attributed amount of square feet of indoor communi- The City of Apple Valley identified operating met- to the Department running a much higher volume ty/recreation center space per resident rics to benchmark against comparable park and operation than its peers and offering unique facil- (1.47). This level of service is in line with recreation systems. The goal of the analysis is to ities, such as the aquatic center, that are more best practice levels nationwide, which is evaluate how Apple Valley is positioned among labor-intensive. around 1.5 sq. ft. per resident, nationally. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Parks and Recreation 7-10 AppValley Community Vision and more "open gym" time. ception and lead to a new or different com- A critical element of the Parks and Recreation Sys- • Multi-generational Health and Wellness In- munity vision. tern Master Plan Update is gathering input from the itiatives - "Health and Wellness" is the third The Apple Valley Parks and Recreation Master community on issues and ideas that will help devel- highest reason for park use according to the Plan should be referred to for a complete under- op Apple Valley Parks to respond to local needs public respondents Additionally, stakehold- standing of the Community Vision. and desires. A community engagement process ers and survey respondents emphasized the was undertaken that focused on local intercepts at importance of multi-generation connections. Freedom Days, stakeholder meetings, and an There was public support for an expanded trail online public survey which was made available network with adequate wayfinding and crea- through the City's website, email subscriber lists, ture comforts (benches), indoor and outdoor fitness equipment, and a connected Senior social media pages, and distributed to Eastview Center Community Center space. and Apple Valley High Schools. This plan is the re- sult of over five months of community participation. • Community Gathering Space - "Group Gatherings" are not currently a big reason for The following ideas seem to carry high public val- park use, but there were a lot of stakeholders ue pertaining to the City of Apple Valley and re- and survey respondents who placed value on flected in the Community Vision: these kinds of spaces. Support for flexible • Youth Athletics - the park system is widely outdoor space for City-held or community held used for athletics according to 82.4% of sur- was large family gatherings and picnicking, vey respondents that selected "athletics" as was expressed during community visioning. the top reason for park use. Additionally, • Enhanced Connections Between Parks stakeholders and survey respondents sup- and Neighborhoods - Particular emphasis ported higher-quality and better maintained should be given to address that there are ad- sports facilities including fields, baseball and equate sidewalk or trail connections to Parks softball facilities, indoor and outdoor ice facili- and neighborhoods. This guiding principle ties, and gym space. was ranked lowest as being met by survey • Free Play - the second highest reason for respondents expectations. park use was "free play" as selected by sur- • Communication — is a top priority for the City vey respondents. Additionally, stakeholders and residents. Apple Valley can increase and survey respondents supported including communication and marketing efforts to raise a fully accessible playground, nature play, awareness about current programs, facilities adventure/ropes course, climbing walls, gen- eral playground update and maintenance, and offerings which may change public per- CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Parks and Recreation 7-11 Apple. Frameworks Plan Distributing parks throughout the City. -_. The Frameworks Plan defines the recommended Strategies: improvement strategies that will serve as a prac- • Continue maintaining existing parks ' _ tical tool to guide the park system's future devel- through- out the City. ik �„c { , . ,a•sp j" k opment and redevelopment efforts. The Plan will • Establish parkland in areas with a gap int , •'Aa i —, help the City prioritize programs and projects as service including the areas presently be- `^ . 4: .i • future decisions are made. ing mined for sand and gravel, and in • the area south of County Road 42 that is 01 ''"rR The following Frameworks Plan outlines strate- undeveloped. gies for improvements that are organized around • Establish, retain and maintain parks or the Department's current and newly developed open space along and adjacent to lakes, guiding principles. ponds and wetlands for public access. 401," Search areas for neighborhood parks: Creating parks that provide people 1. South of Augustana Care(lease/rental - • with places to gather and play. agreement) Strategies: 2. Near Spirit of Life Church - '- j • Provide flexible spaces to accommodate changing trends in demand for park and open 3. Fischer Sand and Aggregate Mine space programming. 4. Hope Church - a wooded triangle that i can possibly accommodate an unpaved • Create destinations for large group or family gathering (i.e. large or clustered picnic shel- trail or nature play { ters) 5. Flagstaff open area - could support Provide a destination park that can accom- community gardens • yX {' � ,,, f modate community events (i.e. food truck fes- ,1 o,:'r f . tivals, Oktoberfest, outdoor concerts, gradua- - k dil' . tions, art fairs, race finish line festivities, etc.) ` '' Keep in mind opportunities that will be attrac- fi t tive to Millennials and young families with im- 1 provements to night life (i.e. concerts in the - _.- . park, beer dabblers, etc.). Suggestions: Johnny Cake East - Field A, Augustana Care south property. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Parks and Recreation 7-12 A Valley Connecting parks and neighborhoods • Develop loop trails within existing parks Provide coordinated, yet age appropriate, with sidewalks and trails. for recreation and circulation. (Sugges- programming to allow for siblings of varying tions: Johnny Cake East, Cortland) ages to participate at the same time, at the Strategies: same place. • Continue to maintain trails throughout parks Matching facilities with the full spec- Improve membership incentives at the Senior and the City as a means for transportation trum of ages, abilities and economic Center. (Suggestion: re-brand to Active Life- and recreation. Look for connections East- style Center and connect to the Community West and develop a "Grand Rounds" full sys status. Creating a system that serves Center). tem connection. all residents. • Prioritize trails that connect neighborhoods to Strategies: already established regional trails and con- • Address ADA accessibility system-wide with nections, transit hubs, and destinations. any new or redeveloped park projects. • Connect to Lebanon Hills Regional Park • Resurface playgrounds with an ADA acces- sible surfacing (i.e., poured in place or syn- • When possible, create linear parks or"green" thetic surface, compacted wood fiber, etc.) corridors. Use trees and other vegetation to and include minimum standards for acces buffer users from traffic and other develop- sibility. ment. (Suggestions: Pilot Knob Road, John- f ny Cake Ridge Road, 140th Street W, 150th • Dedicate at least one City Playground to be Street W, 160th Street W) fully accessible and address both cognitive and physical impairments. (Suggestions: • Provide strategic areas for rest. Areas sur- Quarry Point Park) rounding downtown and areas surrounding _______,......_ • Add benches along trails and in parks, senior care facilities may require more fre- especially near aging population centers quent seating. (i.e., senior care/housing facilities). ' $111 ' V ,. ?-r•.._ • Encourage users with distance markings, • Provide programming to meet the needs 1f wayfinding signage and identification of des- of more residents with additional evening 1 . tinations and City landmarks along trails (i.e., and weekend programs. : _; i { -41 Cobblestone Lake). '-' ' • • Provide additional programming including • Partner with Dakota County Art Display Pro- programming for passive adults, young ,. gram to provide an Art Corridor (e.g., Edina 0 s .- adult and teens, and small children. (e.g., - Promenade). (Suggestions: Downtown Apple art, cooking, and crafts), Valley, or at a possible new development at Top:Trail distance markings can be directly applied to the trail sur- •the Quarry) Continue the FREE summer playground face(shown)or shown with a separate sign; Bottom:All-ages en- program. Analyze the program for im- joying the annual Frozen Apple Concert. provements to reinvent/revitalize it. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Parks and Recreation 7-13 Ap'Valley Providing a wide range of indoor and • Diversify play equipment including climbing tables, removal of the windscreen around outdoor recreation facilities. and adventure play. Climbing/adventure play picnic area, rules and regulations signage.) will include playground features like boulder- • Complete an operational cost assessment Strategies: ing walls and ropes for climbing. Place at of the Redwood Pool to determine its cost • Combine Senior Center and Community Cen- parks near middle schools or areas where Fami- ter Facilities with a central shared space (Ac- versus benefit to the community. The p tweens and teens look for more challenging ly Aquatic Center and aquatic program- tive Lifestyle Center). Keep senior focused play. ming and services that ISD 196 provides at programming at the Senior Center weekday mornings and afternoons, and utilize space for • Provide turf fields at select parks for more the middle schools may address commu- additional community needs weekday evening consistent field conditions and longer play- nity needs. ing seasons. The addition of turf fields into and weekend. the system will help relieve pressure off • Follow trends in recreation and provide • Provide additional indoor gym space.Conduct a non-turf fields and allow for proper field rest. new uses as needed to accommodate de- cost assessment for additional gym space. • Consider permanent or temporary field mand. • Update and maintain warming houses and house or sports dome turf facility. Include Park shelters to be multi-use. Consider elimi- an indoor walking track for additional winter - - nating warming houses with the elimination of recreation opportunities. rinks. • Monitor the use of newly implemented out- r , • Diversify play equipment including nature play. door fitness stations (i.e., Cobblestone). `'� i =4 Place nature play playgrounds at parks that of- Add more as necessary. ,x;: . r . $' fer other nature programming or trails. (Sug- 1 r t _. �'�� • Improve visitor and player experience at '- - �- -=� gestion: Alimagnet or Farquar Park) -- j • 41 - -- Hayes Arena by continuing to make up- dates and improvements to the facility. _ - Add picnic shelters and pavilions.With a lev- _` - el of service recommendation of 11 addi- - tion- al shelters by 2030, the department - -i'W- should assess appropriate locations. (Sug- ,A gestions: Kelley Park, Moeller, Heritage, Di- r amond Path, Cobblestone, Alimagnet, and : ,:., any new neighborhood parks.) • -- :. • Make improvements to the Pickleball facili- ..--� A e . ties at the Community Center to keep Apple - ti - Valley as a top Pickleball provider for the _ = e - -- South Metro. (Suggestions: sound attenua- -- tion, expanded shade structure over picnic Siblings enjoying open gym. Top:The shaded area at the Community Center Pickleball facilities Bottom:Shelter at Redwood CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Parks and Recreation 7-14 AppValley Collaborating with other parties to co- for the City with partnerships with other gov- Develop a natural resource plan that will en- ordinate the delivery of services to ernmental agencies including Dakota County hance the park system and provide the City make effective use of financial re- and surrounding cities. with specific initiatives to manage natural re- sources sources. Collaborate with the Arts foundation to deliver (i.e. Buckthorn removal.) Strategies: and promote arts and cultural events in • Ensure park dedication or a park dedication parks. ,. _ illi 10 fee is collected for all new development ' � h where possible. Using parks as a tool to control flood- ! APO ing, help preserve the quality of the41. P w� • Continue to track volunteers, volunteer hours, Aof surface water, replenish the ground wa- � ` and track partners. Ensure that the database _ rti�„ , ter supply, reduce air pollution and • *�:�. .1Z that tracks all volunteers and volunteer hours / preserve natural resources. 0` ,, , ',. also tracks partners, and partner resources f leveraged (dollar value of partnering, if possi- Strategies: • r �s--,� ,r+• * ble). Assign volunteer and partner tracking re- • Establish, retain and maintain parks or open -- ;� i 1 :' A�,:#0,0 —rlr sponsibility to one staff person; include this in space along and adjacent to lakes, ponds .-- ii, ,,.,- \,,, ►i . the job description. and wetland for stormwater detention, and ire, ,,e ,, resource protection. ' • Establish formal partnership policies and • Dedicate areas to restore as native vege- lr a agreements. Followingthe bestpractice listed tation orpollinator habitats where appro- in �+ 9 pp ` '' ": in the previous section, establish partner policies priate, eliminating maintenance-intensive - 1 and agreements that are tailored to the different turf grass. ,;ram--,' types of partnerships the City encounters. As- • Incorporate rain gardens, natural vegeta- • .= - : A 'i y - , sign management of the policies and agree- E � ��' _ f tive buffers, and other stormwater man- , y. ` r ♦ ments to one staff person and include this in his W'� ° ' ' ' - agement techniques best suited to that w;; .. • ; , �, .. ., or her job description. park area, where appropriate. tt'.y,iR`t ' ,4 �,: r r �,� • Continue to support the City and ISD 196 part- • Make habitat modifications and inn- : i, Y, nership and to coordinate park use with educa- provements that will benefit fish, wildlife, mo r ; tional programs. and native plantings within the City's :. _ • Continue and encourage partnerships with ath- park and open space areas. Using Best letic organizations (e.g., EVAA, VAA) to collabo- Management Practices (BMP's), buffer ,. „. 1 r t rate on park improvements on a shared-use ba- lakes, ponds, wetlands and streams with sis. native grasses and other ecologically Top:Butterflies and other pollinators attracted to native flora. Bottom:Natural areas are an important community asset that should • Continue to enhance park and trail opportunities appropriate plant species. be explored. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Parks and Recreation 7-15 Ai'i'Valley Effectively providing information to Developing a park and recreation sys- • Explore locations for an amphitheater or residents and visitors that will elevate tem that is innovative. band shell. Look for a central location with ample parking. awareness of the park and recreation Strategies: system and services. • Continue updating and enhancing the Apple • Provide spaces for unique activities in Communication is essential to the success of pro- Valley Aquatic Center. The Apple Valley parks. (e.g., Bocce Courts for league use, grams and park system use. This guiding principle hammock groves, etc.) Aquatic Center is an important community was developed because of the lack of awareness resource and provides many jobs for some • Provide food and beverage services (e.g., by residents, visitors and stakeholders of park bier amen, cafe, food trucks, etc.). This and recreation system and services. of Apple Valley's younger residents. g Y type of service could be run by an outside • Explore resident/non-resident membership/ partner. Strategies: season pass options for the Aquatic Center • • Educate the community on the recreational and in place of, or in addition to, a punch card. Determine need for additional staff to man age and take on projects outlined in the educational opportunities that currently exist in • Outdoor Ice usage attendance has dropped plan. the parks system. 34% from 2014-2016, however the dates • Update the City website, using mobile phone that ice was available to residents has de- ,l J ,, and tablet friendly web templates. Include an creased over the years and the average dai- a' l events calendar(i.e. City of St. Louis Park). ly attendance is actually higher. With warm- k � ,.r` `, �_. ",, _ *: ' j ing temperatures, outdoor ice conditions are ° ,ham `" ,14f' • Keep communication strong through social <" a feasible over shorter spans and can be j`1.` a4 ' 45 . ; 1 media outlets. Have a dedicated staff person in `,�, i , more costly to maintain. Consider eliminat- = '-' charge of regular updates. ° V ..°rt f � 4 ing some less popular rinks and add a refrig- 4._ = • Advertise and promote events by partnering ' ti ,r erated ice rink that can be used for a longer r with local media, businesses and partners. ; 8 . I s p period of time and throughout changing a � ,-,.,� � �_ • Continue to develop and enhance printed ma- weather patterns. �, :: r a + 1, � 4 terials including the Parks and Recreation } ry,- �. • The Communitypreferred the addition of an ..... .. f newsletter/brochure. �.r � � � �f` � �°� Adventure Play/Ropes course. This type of Y x f ,.: • Continue the Medallion Search and consider facility is typically not seen at parks in the r implementing additional Parks Contest to pro- metro area. Due to the popularity of this new e7. 4` t"`{ "� - ' am ti . - mote and highlight use of the parks. (Sugges- facility, ideal locations include highly acces- • . �,, f tions: Photo Contest, Park "Passports", ParkRX sible community parks such as Johnny a . i „ a. partnership) �� �� �w - p p) Cake Ridge Park East and West, Hayes, 1. - • Allow for facility rental information to be dis- Quarry Point Park, or Redwood. Explore r r , ?� , a .: A .,- played on the City website. partnerships with the MN Zoo, or pri- ti A • 4 vate/public partnerships (i.e. operated pri- „tiY At µ ° - vately with use on park land). 's. '` Ropes courses can be of varying degrees of difficulty. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Parks and Recreation 7-16 A Valley 8. Transportation Introduction and Authority i The 2040 Transportation Plan is an integrated component of =. the Apple Valley Comprehensive Plan Update. The transporta- tion plan is a key component of the City's Comprehensive F� Plan that assesses all modes of transportation, including streets and highways; trails and sidewalks; transit facilities; and airport accessibility. This plan expresses the location, lim- • i ,\� } its, function, and capacity of all transportation facilities in the = City of Apple Valley. i s The State of Minnesota, through the enactment of the Metro- " x politan Land Planning Act (M.S. 473.859, Subd.3(1)) requires the Metropolitan Council's review of each metropolitan corn '" munity transportation plan to assure conformity with the re —� . ' r.n��, left � gion- al development framework. The Metropolitan Council's a. jititl_4, { I 2040 Transportation Policy Plan (TPP) is the planning docu- ment that provides guidance for policies and strategies includ- ed in the 2040 Apple Valley Transportation Plan. it.. rill:11-114111 III III di CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Transportation 8-1 AppValley Background and Purpose of the Goals, Objectives, and Policies (MVTA), and school transit providers. Transportation Plan Transportation goals and policies reflect the vision Policy 1.3 Look for opportunities with neighboring The City of Apple Valley recognizes the changing for Apple Valley's transportation system. These jurisdictions to enhance local street connectivity travel needs of its residents, commuters, visitors, goals and policies help to guide future priorities between communities. Also, utilize the Regional commercial transporters, pedestrians, and cyclists and investment. They also provide a means to Bicycle Transportation Network(RBTN)to provide making trips within and through the community. To measure the performance of the transportation continuity across major barriers and between ju- provide for safe, multimodal transportation facili- system over time, and as necessary an opportuni- risdictions for bicycle connectivity. ties that offer adequate capacity (existing and fu- ty to revise or supplement the desires of the corn- Policy 1.4 Prioritize investments in A-minor arte- ture) with a high level of mobility, a transportation munity.The goals and policies listed below are not rials that build, manage, or improve the system's improvement plan that corresponds to the City's ranked or presented in any order, importance, or ability to supplement the capacity of the principal overall comprehensive plan must be adopted and need. arterial system. implemented. Apple Valley Goals and Policies Goal 2. Integrate and achieve a balanced mix The 2040 Apple Valley Transportation Plan de- of all transportation modes. All transportation Goal 1. Continue to establish and maintain an projects within the Cityaffect all modes of scribes, designates, and schedules the location, pro 1 interconnected affordable network of road- transportation. Consequently, extent, function, and capacity for all transportation p all projects ways, transit service, bicycle trails and pedes- should be evaluated as to the impact on each modes within the community.To be consistent with p trian facilities between neighborhoods, recre- the mode. regional policy, the 2040 Apple Valley Trans- ational and community facilities, and com- portation Plan includes the following elements: Policy 2.1 Utilize Complete Streets principles to mercial centers, as well as connections out- • An assignment of socioeconomic forecasts side of Apple Valley to the interconnected meet the travel needs of pedestrians, bicyclists, (population, households, and employment) to Metropolitan Region. and transit users. traffic analysis zones (TAZs); Policy 2.2 Promote design best practices, espe- Policy 1.1 Work collaboratively with key stake- • a street and highway plan that maps and de- cially in provided and improving facilities for bicy- holders including Dakota County, Apple Valley scribes existing roads and planned improve- clists and pedestrians, who are the most vulnera- ments, analyzes traffic volumes, and ad- Chamber of Commerce, and affected property dresses safety and capacity issues; owners on solutions that sustain, grow, unify and ble users of the transportation system. keep the downtown vital. Policy 2.3 Facilitate neighborhood pedestrian and • a bicycle and pedestrian plan; bicycle connections to highway-oriented corn- Policy 1.2 Coordinate regional roadway preserva- • a transit plan for facilities and service; and mercial districts. While also promoting safe path- tion improvements with other transportation sys- • an aviation plan that identifies aviation-related tern partners in the community, including: the ways for pedestrians and bicyclists in parking lots facilities and addresses airspace protections. Minnesota Department of Transportation and internal traffic circulation areas. (MnDOT), Dakota County, Minnesota Valley Policy 2.4 Review new developments for adequa- Transit Authority CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Transportation 8-2 Apple cy of parking based upon need and the potential the transportation system as a whole. City's intelligent transportation system (ITS) infra- for joint use of parking facilities. Policy 4.1 Reduce travel demand by encouraging structure to be prepared to potentially support au- Policy 2.5 Provide and protect efficient connec- programs that provide alternatives to single oc- tonomous and connected vehicles (AV/CV) in the tions from major freight facilities to the regional cupant vehicles. Work with businesses, develop- future. highway system. ers, and transit providers during the plan review Policy 6.2 Utilize projects with significant invest- Goal 3. Protect investments in the transporta- process to plan for multimodal strategies and op- ments (i.e., construction and reconstruction pro- tion system through strategic preservation, tions. jects)to implement AV/CV technology. maintenance, and operation of system assets. Policy 4.2 Coordinate with regional governments, Policy 6.3 Mitigate impacts to the natural envi- Policy 3.1 Maintain pavement and permanent transit agencies, and rideshare programs to cap- ronment and cultural resources when planning, right-of-way fixtures associated with the local ture the environmental and social costs of corn- constructing, and operating transportation sys- roadway, bridge, trail, and sidewalk system using muting and incentivize alternatives to single- tems. routine inspections, maintenance programs, and occupancy vehicle trips. Roadway System improvement programs coordinated by the Apple Goal 5. Work with local entities to continue to Valley Public Works Department. enhance transit usage in Apple Valley while Roadway Jurisdictional Classification Policy 3.2 Existing roadways should be upgraded providing linkages both locally and regionally System when warranted bydemonstrated volume, safety, via transit. Jurisdiction over Apple Valley's roadway system or functional needs; utilizing performance Policy 5.1 Continue to work with MVTA to deter- is divided among the state, county, and city. The measures to catalog system deficiencies; and mine future transit services consistent with the system includes the interstate and Trunk Highway identifying the level of satisfaction experienced by City's transit market and its associated service (TH) system, managed by MnDOT, and the Coun- users of the transportation system. standards and strategies. ty State Aid Highway (CSAH) and County Road Policy 3.3 Protect and strengthen the role of the Policy 5.2 The City will develop a transportation system, managed by Dakota County.All remaining regional transportation system to provide secure system that is cost-feasible, where expenditures public streets and roadways are the City's re- and effective emergency response to serious in- satisfy a public transportation policy. sponsibility. Roadway jurisdiction is based on cidents and threats through transportation im- Policy 5.3 Provide trail connections to transit fa- several factors, including the following: provements and municipal policy. cilities. • Length of road/length of trip served Policy 3.4 Invest in transportation improvements Goal 6. Ensure the Apple Valley transportation Connections to roads of similar jurisdiction that will attract and retain businesses and workers system is resilient, sustainable, and able to level within Apple Valley, and pursue design alterna- evolve with societal advancements and • Average daily traffic tives that reflect the values of its citizens. changes, safeguarding investments for many . Functional classification Goal 4. Improve the functionality and safety of years to come. • Special facilities served Policy 6.1 Consider opportunities to improve the In general, the following relationships are ob- CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Transportation 8-3 AppI/alley served and are depicted on Figure 8.1: • CSAH 46 (160th Street). • Principal Arterials • Roadways that serve regional, inter-county or Local Street System • Minor Arterials (A Minor and OtherArterials) statewide transportation needs are typically • Major Collectors owned and maintained by the State(MnDOT). The City's remaining public streets and roadways • • Roadways that serve inter-city and constitute the local city street system. Local Streets sub- regional needs generally qualify as CSAHs or Roadway Functional Classification County Roads and are owned and main- System tained by Dakota County. • Roadways that primarily serve local transpor- The purpose of a functional classification sys- tation needs are owned and maintained by the tern is to create a hierarchy of roads that collects City of Apple Valley. and distributes traffic from neighborhoods to the county and state highway systems in as efficient a Metropolitan Highway System manner as possible. Roads are placed into func- Roadways within Apple Valley that are under tional categories based on the degree to which MnDOT's jurisdiction include: they provide access to adjacent land or provide mobility to through traffic. Ideally, roads are de- • Interstate 35E; and signed to perform a designated function and are • TH 77 located to best serve the type of travel needed. County Road System Transportation issues arise when roadway de- sign is inconsistent with the functional demands In addition to the metropolitan highway system, imposed on the roadway. The functional classifi- most of the City's main transportation corridors cation system used in the City of Apple Valley is are part of the County Highway System. Road- like that of the Metropolitan Council except for the ways within Apple Valley that are under Dakota minor collector designation which is currently not County jurisdiction include: reflected on the Metropolitan Council network but • CSAH 11; is part of the City's system. This designation is • CSAH 23 (Cedar Avenue); proposed to be added to the Metropolitan Coun- CSAH 31 (Pilot Knob Road); cil's system as documented later in this chapter. • Apple Valley's functional classification system, as • CSAH 33 (Diamond Path); currently recognized by the Metropolitan Council • CSAH 38 (McAndrews Road); (illustrated on Figure 8.3), includes the following • CSAH 42 (150th Street); and four primary categories: CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Transportation 8-4 APPValley Figure 8.1 Jurisdictional Classification / L) •ram . ,._ I. EAGAN b <1g • ` o i 77 Er =_ irk llvaohm ,,,,, . to z ..jr . ir MN ., $'�•�� z , r 33 1I41P ��4 al 0 ! i.ais ���-'�.. 2 (1r-; } �, rn JM4--7 WSRD .11 it � � 3i ` lirrotusim ' ..- ;NIr1 gib. L P Matti Al RAI ..# "g ' - Legend0 Illriit1 4r, i � � ;{ r 9 , 0 a ■� . ` APPLE b to b% re Interstate ' 1 VALLEY State HighwayWill Oa o - `� ��� ,,, 41 County Road U I l laff 1 dvi!:, I lip Connector(Ramp) 150TH ST W •42 1 I-5QTFN-ST W Local Roads Apple Valley1� ' �,� ,.� +�i`1� Anu �- ha Lkt � �i�J A Municipal Boundaries °mI.MIMM 0 0.5 1 Jri"i Q I :" W. IH. iiiramr Miles o � it , � Al - lc=I HI_P-417 4§. 160TH ST 1N ' ru n C LAKEVILLE CITY OF APPLE VALLEY I 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Transportation 8-5 AppValley The A Minor/Other Arterials and Major/Minor Col- I• - 8.2 R•.•TT.If_tststo`L u[•lli9[ocAtir R-l.t • • lector designations were adopted by the Metropol- itan Council as a means for identifying roadways which are oriented toward mobility or through-trips w (A-Minor and Major Collectors) versus those that -ti- t1 Note: Reret�taeo f are oriented more toward accessibility or land ac- 2 Roadway Mileage cess (Other Arterials or Minor Collectors). Figure ee4 8.2 depicts the relationship between land access C,` and mobility and how the different classifications , ` of roads provide varying degrees of mobility ver- SO o sus land access. Table 8.1 details criteria for 6 f roadway functional classification per the Metro- `1 politan Council's classification system. S. d O o NoTxru Tfaffic No Local Traffic Low Speed Mobility High Speed CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update {; Transportation 8-6 Apple Figure 3. Existing Functional Classification EAGAN /1 — —— -- —=.=_ ----- 0 77 m O / ® z ) 11 ih•i��. I o a co •� 6_ tie r MCANDREWSRD _ ill [ ---l ,I t \-N. ? 1 \ q- -- / for id Z 0 Legend 0 I OP W W — - co a - Principal Arterial / VALLEYAPPLE ' ij `� 0 A Minor Expander wo V`� II: �, Other Arterial • • 150TH ST W ii ier.4 ,_ - Major Collector L l 42` ` - Minor Collector fr /Ati Apple Valley pTh I \ t� 1J L - Municipal Boundaries / jI If ‘60:0, 0 0.5 1 \ I 1 .J M —21 Miles -- 160TH ST W irV LAKEVILLE^ 'I - 1) ),,W4 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Transportation 8-7 AppValley Table 8.1 Roadway Functional Classification Criteria Criteria Principal Arterial Minor Arterial and Other Arterial Collector Local Street Provide supplementary connections be- Connect blocks and land Connect neighborhoods and Place Con- Connect regional job concentrations and freight tween regional job concentrations, local parcels within neighborhoods nections terminals within the urban service area. centers,and freight terminals within the centers within the urban and within commercial or in- serviceurban service area. area. dustrial developments. Job concentrations: Urban communities:2 -3 miles Regional job concentrations: 1/8- 1/2 mile Ur- Spacing Suburban communities:Spacing should vary 1/4-3/4 mile ban Communities: As needed to access land uses in relation to development density of land uses Urban communities: 1/2 1 mile 1/4 3/4 mile served,2 - 6 miles Suburban communities: 1- 2 miles Suburban Communities: 1/2 - 1 mile To Interstate freeways,other principal arterials, and select A-minor arterials.Connections be- To most interstates, principal arterials, To a few minor arterials. System To minor arterials,other tween principal arterials should be of a design other minor arterials,collectors and some To collectors and other local Connections and local streets. type that does not require vehicles to stop. local streets collectors, streets. Intersections should be limited to 1-2 miles. Medium-to-short tips(2-6 miles depending Short trips(1-4 miles de- Short trips(under 2 miles)at Trips greater than 8 miles with at least 5 con- on development density)at moderate low speeds,including bicycle pending on development ak tinuous miles on principal arterials. Express speeds. Longer trips accessing the princi- and pedestrian trips. Longer and highway bus rapid transit trips pal arterial network. Local, limited-stop, density)at low to moderate trips accessing the collector speeds. and arterial bus rapid transit trips. and arterial network. Emphasis on mobility for longer trips rather Emphasis is on mobility for longer trips rather than on direct land access.Direct land ac- Emphasis on land access,not Service than direct land access. Little or no direct land cess limited to concentrations of activity To collectors and other local on mobility. Direct land access access within the urbanized area. including regional job concentrations, streets. predominantly to residential local centers,freight terminals,and land uses. neighborhoods. Equal emphasis on mobility Mobility vs. 5 10% 10 15% and land access.Direct land 60-75% Land Access access predominantly to de- velopment concentrations. System Mileage 15-35% 15-25% 5-15% 10-25% Percent of Vehi- cle Miles Tra 5-10% 10-15% 5-15% 60-75% eled Criteria 15-35% 15-25% 10-25% 10-25% CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update ;s• Transportation 8-8 Apple Table 8.1 Roadway Functional Classification Criteria (cont.) Criteria Principal Arterial Minor Arterial and Other Arterial Collector Local Street Grade separated desirable where appropriate. Traffic signals, roundabouts,and Four-way stops and some Intersections At a minimum, high-capacity controlled at-grade cross street stops traffic signals As required intersections Parking None Restricted as necessary Restricted as necessary Permitted as necessary Candidates for local truck network,large May be candidates for local Large Trucks No restrictions truck network, large trucks Permitted as necessary trucks restricted as necessary restricted as necessary Ramp metering, preferential treatment for Traffic signal progression and spacing, land Number of lanes,traffic Management transit,access control, median barriers,traffic Intersection control,cul-de- access management/control, preferential signal timing, land access Tools signal progression,staging of reconstruction, treatment for transit management sacs,diverters H intersection spacing Typical Average Daily Traffic Vol-1 15,000-100,000+ 5,000-30,000+ 1,000-15,000+ Less than 1,000 umes Posted Spee 40-65 mph 30-45 mph 30-40 mph Maximum 30 mph Limit Right-of-Way 100-300 feet 60-150 feet 60-100 feet 50-80 feet Transit Transit advantages that provide priority access Transit advantages for reliable movement Regular route buses,transit Normally used as bus routes and reliable movement for transit in peak peri- advantages for reliable Accommodations where needed. only in nonresidential areas ods where possible and needed movement,where needed On,along,or crossing On facilities that cross or are parallel to the prin- On facilities that cross or are parallel to the collector with higher Bicycle and cipal arterial,with greater emphasis along trans- the minor arterial,with greater emphasis emphasis along transit On,along,or crossing the local Pedestrian Ac- it routes and in activity centers.Crossings along transit routes and in activity centers. routes and in activity road commodations should be spaced to allow for adequate crossing Crossings should be spaced to allow for centers.Crossings opportunities. adequate crossing opportunities. should be spaced for adequate crossing op- portunities. Source:Metropolitan Council,2040 Transportation Policy Plan,2015 This table summarizes characteristics for existing roadways to be used in evaluating functional classification and should not be used as design guidelines. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY I 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update ; � Transportation 8-9 Apple Principal Arterials Table 8.2 Principal Arterial Summary Minor Arterials Principal arterials are part of the metropolitan high- Roadway From To Lanes 2014 Minor arterials are intended to connect important Volume way system and provide high-speed mobility be- locations inside and outside of the City. They gen- Trunk High- tween the Twin Cities and important locations out- way 77 erally connect to principal arterials or other minor Interstate CSAH 11 4 63,000 side the metropolitan area.They are also intended 35E (Cedar arterials or collectors. While there is generally to connect the central business districts of the two Avenue) more access to minor arterials than principal arte- central cities with each other and with other re- 135E Palomino 6 76,000 rials, the emphasis is still on mobility. Major busi- Drive gional business concentrations in the metropolitan ness concentrations and other important traffic Palomino CSAH 38 area. Principal arterials are generally constructed (McAndrews 5 70,000 genera-tors are commonly located on minor arte- Drive Road) as limited access freeways in the urban area, but TH 77 rials. The Metropolitan Council has identified mi- may also be constructed as multiple-lane divided (Cedar CSAH 38 nor arterials that are of regional importance be- Avenue) McAn- 138th highways.Apple Valley is served by three principal (drews Street 5 55,000 cause they relieve traffic on the principal arterials arterials: 1-35E, TH 77 (north of CSAH 42), and Road) or substitute for principal arterials when neces- CSAH 42 (150th Street) (as shown in Figure 8.3). 138th CSAH 42 sary. These roads have been labeled as Minor ar- Street (150th 6 45,400 Table 8.2 provides an overview of the principal Street) terials and categorized into four types: Relievers, arterial roadways within Apple Valley. It identifies West City CSAH 23 Expanders, Connectors, and Augmenters. Limits (Cedar 4 31,000 the number of travel lanes along with the existing Avenue) • A Minor—Relievers are roadways that provide (2014) traffic volumes for each principal arterial in CSAH 23 direct relief for traffic on major metropolitan (Cedar Galaxie 4 34,500 the City. Avenue highways (principal arterials). Avenue) Johnny • A Minor—Expanders are routes that provide a CSAH 42 Galaxie Cake Ridge 4 34,500 way to make connections between developing (150th Avenue Road Street) areas outside the interstate ring. Johnny CSAH 31 Cake • A Minor— Connectors are roadways that pro- Ridge (Pilot Knob 28,000 Road) vide good, safe connections among town cen- Road ters. CSAH 31 East City (Pilot Knob Limits 4 19,000 • A Minor — Augmenters are roadways that Road) augment principal arterials within the inter- Source:MnDOT,Metropolitan Council,SRF Consulting Group,Inc. state ring. Within Apple Valley, the following roadways are classified as A Minor Arterials: • CSAH 11 — Expander CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Transportation 8-10 AppValley • CSAH 38 (McAndrews Road)—Expander There is one "Other" arterial roadway withinApple • CSAH 31 (Pilot Knob Road)—Expander Valley that runs north-south through the City: Table 8.4 "Other"Arterial Summary • CSAH 23 (Cedar Avenue: south of CSAH 42) CSAH 33 (Diamond Path) Roadway From To La — Expander Tables 8.3 and 8.4 provide an overview of the CSAH 31 • CSAH 46 (160th Street)—Expander minor arterials within Apple Valley. 140th p pp (Pilot Knob 8,100 Street Road) Table 8.3 A Minor Arterial (Expander) Summary 140th 145th 4 I 10,600 Roadway From To 1 Lanes 2014 Volume Street Street West City Limits Garden View Drive 4 7,700 145th CSAH 42 Garden View Drive Pennock Avenue 4 10,800 CSAH 33 Street (150th 8,400 Street) Pennock Avenue Trunk Highway 77 4 11,400 (Diamond - CSAH 42 CSAH 38(McAndrews Trunk Highway 77 Galaxie Avenue 4 17,900 Path) (150th Dodd 3,400 Road) Galaxie Avenue Johnny Cake Ridge Road 4 14,600 Street) Blvd Johnny Cake Ridge Road Everest Trail 4 11,300 155th Dodd Blvd 2 4,550 Everest Trail CSAH 31(Pilot Knob Road) 4 9,200 Street CSAH 31(Pilot Knob Road) East City Limits 2 9,300 155th South Northern City Limits CSAH 38(McAndrews Street City 2,750 4 20,500 Road) Limits CSAH 38(McAndrews CSAH 33(Diamond Path) 4 17,500 Source:MnDOT,Metropolitan Council,SRF Consulting Group,Inc. CSAH 31(Pilot Knob Road) Road) CSAH 33(Diamond Path) 140th Street 4-5 12,600 — Collectors 140th Street CSAH 42(150th Street) 4 18,900 CSAH 42(150th Street) South City Limits 4 24,000 As noted previously, the Metropolitan Council's I-35E Palomino Drive 4 21,200 functional classification system provides for two CSAH 11 CSAH 38(McAndrews types of collector streets (Major and Minor),which Palomino Drive 4 17,800 Road) provide a balance between land access and mo- ICSAH 23(Cedar Avenue) CSAH 42(150th Street) South City Limits 6 34,100 bility and move local street traffic to the arterial West City Limits Garden View Drive 4 25,200 roadway system. Major collector roadways are Garden View Drive CSAH 23(Cedar Avenue) 4 29,000 designed to serve shorter trips that occur primari- CSAH 46(160th Street) CSAH 23(Cedar Avenue) Flagstaff Avenue 4 28,000 ly within the City, and collect and distribute traffic Flagstaff Avenue CSAH 31(Pilot Knob Road) 4 27,500 from neighborhoods and employment centers to CSAH 31(Pilot Knob Road) East City Limits 4 24,000 the arterial system. These streets are typically Source:MnDOT,Metropolitan Council,SRF Consulting Group,Inc. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY I 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Transportation 8-11 p'pPValley part of the City's municipal state aid system. The Table 8.5 Major Collector Summary City's major collector system includes the follow- I Roadway From L To Lanes 2014 Volume ing streets (as shown in Figure 8.3): CSAH 38(McAndrews Road) Garden View Drive 4 11,000 • Galaxie Avenue; Garden View Drive CSAH 23(Cedar Avenue) 4 10,400 CSAH 23(Cedar Avenue) Galaxie Avenue 4 17,900 • 140th Street; 140th Galaxie Avenue Johnny Cake Ridge Road 4 I 17,200 Street • Garden View Drive (south of CSAH Johnny Cake Ridge Road CSAH 31(Pilot Knob Road) 4 15,400 38/McAndrews Road); and CSAH 31(Pilot Knob Road) 142nd Path W 4 8,800 • Johnny Cake Ridge Road (north of CSAH 142nd Path W East City Limits 4 7,000 42/150th Street). CSAH 38(McAndrews Road) 140th Street 4 2,750 140th Street Walnut Lane 4 4,500 The number of travel lanes and existing (2014) Garden Walnut Lane CSAH 42(150th Street) 4-5 3,600 traffic volumes for the City's four major collectors View Drive CSAH 42(150th Street) Whitney Drive 4 4,650 are provided in Table 8.5. Whitney Drive South City Limits 4 3,050 Minor collector roadways collect and distribute traf- North City Limits 127th Street W 2 3,950 fic from neighborhoods to the major collector and 127th Street W CSAH 38(McAndrews Road) 2 6,400 arterial networks. These roads are generally CSAH 38(McAndrews Road) 132nd Street 4 11,400 shorter and less continuous than major collectors, Galaxie 132nd Street 140th Street 4 11,700 Avenue but serve to supplement those streets. These 140th Street CSAH 42(150th Street) 4-5 14,000 streets are typically part of the City's municipal CSAH 42(150th Street) 153rd Street I 4-5 13,600 state aid system. As noted previously, the Metro- 153rd Street South City Limits 4-5 8,500 politan Council's 2017 Functional Classification North City Limits 125th Street W 3 6,800 system does not identify any minor collector Johnny 125th Street W CSAH 38(McAndrews Road) 3 6,300 streets within the City of Apple Valley. Cake Ridge CSAH 38(McAndrews Road) 132nd Street 4 9,000 Road 132nd Street 140th Street 4 7,700 140th Street CSAH 42(150th Street) i 4 7,500 Source:MnDOT,Metropolitan Council,SRF Consulting Group,Inc. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Transportation 8-12 Apple Local Streets and minor arterial classifications in the City of Classification system (as identified in Figure 8.3) Apple Valley. to minor collectors: All other public and private streets within Apple Valley are classified as local streets. Local streets There are also changes proposed to the collec- • Palomino Drive provide the highest level of direct access and car- tor/local functional classifications. The proposed • 127th Street ry the lowest traffic volumes at the lowest speeds. changes are based on the Federal Highway Ad- • ministration's Functional Classification Manual cri- Evermoor Parkway Recommended Changes to Functional Clas- teri• a, Metropolitan Council guidance and several • 132nd Street sification System other factors, including: • Ellice Trail The functional classification system for roadways • Estimated trip length • 142nd Street in the City of Apple Valley was reviewed to ensure • Trip type • Essex Avenue appropriate network connectivity is maintained • Connections to activity centers, • 145th Street and for consistency with the functional classifica- tion criteria established by the Metropolitan • Spacing • 147th Street Council. In addition, coordination with Dakota • Continuity • 153rd Street County took place to understand their perspec- . Mobility tive regarding county roads within the City; this The minor collector designation acknowledges • Accessibility coordination yielded the proposed change of each of the roadways' function of providing con- • CSAH 23 (Cedar Avenue)from an A minor arteri- Speed nections to major collectors and arterial routes al to a principal arterial from CSAH 42 to the Given these criteria, the following roadways are while emphasizing land access over mobility. south City limits and CSAH 46. The functional recommended to be reclassified from local streets classification system illustrated in Figure 8.4 is per the Metropolitan Council's 2017 Functional representative of future conditions for principal CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Transportation 8-13 p`PPValley Figure 4. Recommended Future Functional Classification System EAGAN 0 7 m /ir-, z 0 2 - MCANDREWS VD z 1 F m Legend0 - Principal Arterial ? ^ , �- I (�// Z A Minor Expander Wm ru)j r 11 — Other Arterial APPLE f C ce - Major Collector > VALLEY a - Minor Collector cr Lu ———- Planned Major Collector 150TH ST W , \ \,i t 150TH ST W ———- Planned Minor Collectortki — Planned Local Road I. — I r--I '0 1 1 Functional Class Change ( � ,,J--——L 1 I o Apple Valley ¢ 1 5 L Municipal Boundaries w L v 160TH ST W r^1 0 2 0 0.5 1Miles LAKEVILLE �• .J_ 1l 7 L CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Transportation 8-14 ApPValley Planning Context - Studies, Projects, west City boundary to east City boundary, land use concept identifies the following land uses Issues requiring 200 feet(or more)of right-of-way. within the area: low and high density residential; The purpose of this section is to highlight the • CSAH 46: Future six-lane need from west commercial; office, and industrial. Planned land ious roadway/corridor studies that have been var- City boundary to east City boundary, requiring development and increased travel demand will at- 200 feet of right-of-way. tract additional traffic to the area. Thus, three im- con- ducted wholly or partially within Apple Valley since the 2009 Apple Valley Transportation Plan • CSAH 23 (Cedar Avenue): Future need for portant local collector streets are planned for the more than six-lanes from Highway 77 termini area: was completed. The descriptions highlight the is- tosues and opportunities facing some of the key the south City boundary, requiring more • Johnny Cake Ridge Road will be extended roadways in the City. than 200 feet of right-of-way. from CSAH 42 to 157th Street. The Dakota County Plan also identifies inter- • 153rd Street will extend to the east and con- Dakota County 2030 Transportation Plan change needs, that until the county updates its nect with 155th Street at Pilot Knob Road. The Dakota County 2030 Transportation Plan plan to 2040 timeframe, which include: • Local streets will be constructed to run north/ (June 2012) is the most current, complete plan • CSAH 23/140th Street West south and east/west to provide internal traffic for the county road system in Dakota County. It is • CSAH 23/147th Street West circulation from 155th Street to Johnny Cake referenced as part of the county's Draft Compre- Ridge Road extensions. • CSAH 23/CSAH 42 hensive Plan (DC2040). It identifies major trans- Downtown Ring Route portation system investments and prioritizes the CSAH 23/CSAH 46 anticipated needs associated with preservation, • CSAH 31/CSAH 42 The downtown area of Apple Valley is near Cedar management, replacement, and transportation al- • CSAH 31/CSAH 46 Avenue and CSAH 42. The area has been desig- ternatives goals. nated as the shopping, service and employment At the time the Apple Valley Transportation Plan center of the community. Distinctive streetscape The plan identifies county highway expansion was completed, none of these identified needs needs within the City. It also notes that TH 77 improvements were built in 1990 to allow local y have been programmed or planned by Dakota (be- tween CSAH 32 and 140th Street) is fore- traffic to patronize local businesses. This is known County. Therefore, they are not immediately ac- as the Downtown Ring Route. casted to experience a capacity deficiency over counted for as part of this municipal plan 2040 the plan period assuming no additional highway roadway system assumptions. Identified needs The City should ensure that the transportation el- improvements are made. The expansion needs based on the analysis contained herein is provid- ements in the downtown area continue to ac- identified include: ed later in the Plan. commodate existing and future travel demand to • CSAH 38 (McAndrews Road): Future four- Orchard Place Land Use Concept serve the community shopping and service needs lane need from CSAH 31 to east City bound- of its residents due to its convenient location to ary, requiring 150 feet of right-of-way. In 2017 Apple Valley completed a concept study Apple Valley residents, contribution to the City tax for the Orchard Place development located south base, and its significance as an activity hub in the • CSAH 42: Future six-lane(or more)need from of CSAH 42 and east of Flagstaff Avenue. This City. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Transportation 8-15 APR1/alley "Great Streets" Concept Metropolitan Council City of Apple Valley The Vision chapter of the Apple Valley Compre- • METRO Red Line Extension: 3-mile extension • Apple Valley 12th Addition (Redwood Drive hensive Plan states that the City should be a of the Red Line with plans to include three Area): Street and Utility Reconstruction (time- place of Great Streets. A great street extends be- new stations from Apple Valley to Lakeville frame: 2018) yond the street surface to the sidewalks and Dakota County • Johnny Cake Ridge Road: Four lane to three landscaping in the adjacent right-of-way. A great lane conversion and street and utility recon- CSAHstreet provides for the safe and efficient move- • 33 (Diamond Path): Construction of struction from 140th Street to Falcon Ridge ment of vehicles while encouraging travel by bi- a roundabout at the intersection of CSAH Trail (timeframe: 2019) cycles and pedestrians. A great street supports 33 (Diamond Path) and 140th Street (Apple • Cimarron&Surrey Trail Area: Street and utility Valley)/Connemara Trail (Rosemount) (time- and enhances land use. A great street adds to reconstruction (timeframe: 2020) frame: 2019-2022) the quality of life and identity of Apple Valley. The • Apple Valley 11th and 12th Addition (Rams- CSAH• street system should be designed to avoid unin- 38 (McAndrews Road): Conversion dell, Baldwin, Lowell Drive Area): Street and tended trafficpatterns and volumes. Therefore, of existing two-lane roadway to a three-lane utility reconstruction (timeframe: 2019) the City should implement the Great Streets con- roadway with right-turn lanes at major inter- sections from CSAH 31 (Pilot Knob Road) • 142nd Street from Pennock to Cedar: Street cept when planning future improvements to reconstruction in Apple Valley to TH 3 in Rosemount (time- (timeframe: 2019) transportation corridors such as CSAH 23 (Cedar frame: 2017-2018) 145th Street from Pennock to Cedar: Street Avenue), CSAH 42, and the Downtown Ring • CSAH 31 (Pilot Knob Road): Construction of reconstruction (timeframe: 2021) Route. an Advanced Traffic Management System • Pennock Lane from 140th to 145th Street: Programmed or Planned Improvements along CSAH 31 (Pilot Knob Road)from 170th Street reconstruction Street in Lakeville to CSAH 38 (McAndrews Programmed improvements are those improve- • Gardenview Drive: Street and utility recon- Road) (timeframe: 2017-2018) ments that have been approved for implements- struction (timeframe: 2020) • CSAH 38: Repair/replace deteriorating modu- tion with funding sources already identified. Pro- • Hayes Road from 140th to 150th Street: Street lar block retaining walls along CSAH 38 (time- reconstruction timeframe: 2022 grammed improvements are identified in MnDOT's frame: 2021) ( ) Metro Capital Highway Investment Plan (CHIP), • 157th Street from Cedar Avenue to Galaxie •Metropolitan Council's 2040 Transportation Policy County Road 42: Replace/rebuild traffic con- Avenue: Street reconstruction (timeframe Plan (TPP), Dakota County's Capital Improvement trol signal systems along the intersections of 2022) , and the Cityof Apple Valley's CIP. County Road 42 and Hayes Avenue, South- Plan (CIP • ( ) pp y cross Drive, Garden View Drive, Garrett Ave- Traffic Signal Reconstruction MnDOT nue and median/access modifications at Elm • CSAH 42 and Elm Drive, Garden Drive and Redwood Drive (timeframe 2018- View Drive, Hayes Road and Pennock • No projects identified within the City of Apple 2020) Valley Avenue CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Transportation 8-16 APPValley • CSAH 11 and CSAH 38 and 140th 2040 Forecast Traffic Volumes Street Year 2040 daily traffic volumes were developed • Traffic Signal Construction by considering the historical traffic growth rates • Johnny Cake Ridge Road and Upper on each roadway in Apple Valley,the broader Met- 147th Street ropolitan Council regional travel demand activity- • 132nd Street and Galaxie Avenue based model trends, and previously prepared forecasts for roadways in the area. In areas where • Roundabout Construction land development is anticipated,the projected traf- • 147th Street and Glazier Avenue fic volume was compared to generalized traffic trip Figure 8.5 presents the existing and future road- rates for the development types and the traffic way system number of lanes based on current volumes adjusted as necessary. For documenta- conditions and the identified programmed im- tion purposes, Figure 8.6 presents the roadway provements above. network and Transportation Analysis Zones for the City of Apple Valley contained in the Metropoli- Coordination with Other Jurisdictions tan Council regional travel demand model. Figure The City of Apple Valley should continue to coor- 8.7 presents the existing (2014) and forecast dinate with adjacent jurisdictions (i.e., Burnsville, (2040) traffic volumes for all roadways within Ap- Eagan, Rosemount, and Lakeville), Dakota Coun- ple Valley. ty, and MnDOT when planning future improve- ments. Coordination among jurisdictions provides opportunities for collaboration that could benefit all agencies and the public. This collaboration can result in financial and time savings through econ- omies of scale, as well as potentially reducing construction impacts to residents through the co- ordination of projects. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Transportation 8-17 p`PPValley Figure 5. Existing and Future Roadway Geometry(Number of Lanes) I ' MEW � e , V EAGAN 4*"),,,k , • / Y "4 41 , iv) 77 v %I ghl _ _ ..aI%-if si It' ' 7I P1 gtoi W en; agj D i MCANDREWSTRD ��A Z r a 60siPl 6E% )i— G /:_, rl , , v,, ,,,dijig "alms-11111 1 EihretrAll • 4 - ' ' & i lic-N -Orgp lecliii. ,2, rx orim„.;._ 1 wi ,,, /I w . :.= 'im, rw. e i (---1- Milt -Dix =Y ,o 0 0 1 --LII APPLE — O Legend 0 �� r_ VALLEY 1 di � j Existing Number of Lanes � 62 1r 1 �• �� _ 4 ii ilr 6II - Dig )-- 3 1 TH ST W' b 'T .. W sr F1uture Number of Lanes glit*Iiii bow + — I NI , �, Wal - 4W�2 4111 A • cif sp mw I ' _. �14.0Apple Valley W Municipal Boundaries � � , 40111111111 . ak �f t 0 0.5 1 • 160TH STW; Or • grimi Miles 4 • � r�� I LAKEVILLEIL �v� CITY OF APPLE VALLEY I 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update d ,; Transportation 8-18 Apple„ Valley Figure 8.6 Transportation Anal sis Zones --'54_,..stV649 # / - 5155 I "530 f 551 552I 1- 629 526 521 L 512 548 663 EAGANIll '4 547- ' ` 519 / 558 556 ' + 7 .I a 520 51`, I 557 35E, I 52� 519 569...41, Moi ir. �i �are 563 ATM , J 11 38 Pildp 621 4A Z/ 600 NICANDFFEWSyRD 605Wirr 33; 580 ) . I C • rod /bp } i= 98' '� 621 1 m . JAW 3,._______, „n � � �! �� Veal - lir 603 1 06 Ab:: ' M ill I �602 rm. �� 604 x 561 • co562 ill Nemcz ��MS ■ l o .� fi06 z raiLisAa598 ¢ o a emil At .� p 75 ri )� i gmrai w 1 595 594 ,I Ire ` APPLE O 597 Ij '� r ' VALLEY In II� Mk W 586 ' ` 6_i0 / 609 608 ■r 607 620 itilliiill".1 596 I, lk& Mill mew I LegendMIP �� 5 - � 150THST W 58; TAZ Boundaries ' . fi12 617 J gofer 71 Apple Valley1 ��F61/ AI e 11Ia-, WI 11 WI N 1$111* idimi : _ Municipal Boundaries 590 miii613wg a � MW 618 3 _ 636 56 0 0.5 1 tIP' r 591 J 0) a�!* '' Miles I14 615. {*r� ,llt Willl 181 661 l , r 4s: 160TH ST W; T 4 46 660 656 ,-- 655J f 650 LAKEVILE- 649 637 716 64.13 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Transportation 8-19 APRVaney Figure 8.7 Existing and Forecast Traffic Volumes 1 `j "0=O0ma,)W-n-i-•r' imi40 b. 1i)0', 0"fei lyi 1i:c7<Cz/33 • e. .af Li' . A EAGAN 1 0/- t'be P, s o,Ii p Wi,r0A--0'1_1/,.e4., , 7.g....11 6 ,„-„,L 0 0 \ ggczo,. 0 CD IP )_--g,,z0z0,C0.D,3, d,, ia N!N11 1i5 1—,,,.00u-,l 1�--T..EO co 4 O Ii 7 \ NN - ` 9300 (. C35� - - 6 M 0 JO i 91pp p 13700 1 {1 . rlr ait f AA o G v N ....._ 153uv ,, N 11 o w 179D0 A1, pp 38 O o 1 4r1 r�/ +� cr +•22000 0 0, ^15 m 3 3 VIM I m G o ATw �" 7700J tom 38• 41 0� 31 i 0. q 0 g4p0 13400 , 0Ira 11,r'' SR 7'p N -0 0 [o-o) 111111061111111 �IMPo� or o 0 ttj 4 r o .o a 0 c-o o _ �_ Ix OO / u�7 '� ~ 1� N �L 0 O II 011111N r z . 10400 1790D 17200 �� 15400 M880D 7000]� 4ge - c _ 1200D c o 197900 19fi00 21000 10500 1050 c 0 011101P-'9 . . 00 0c ups Wita U) 0 1.0 'p _ohre \ I�J ■V r '' APPLE I , ��� � VALLEY Ur i o oLe end 0 ali iPii1IN 0 ilt '� M g 31000 34500 34500 �1900fl jC- r _� a2; l .300 Existing Traffic Volumes re—. i� 380fl0 40000 35000 *�T^® 1 go 24000 _ -, , 0 0 1 ��- 0 0 0000 Forecast(204d)Traffic Volumeslh,0 ,� m �'� Ar Apple Valley �,- �" V� ', : L � r Municipal Boundaries 0.-o c �� mik -� 3I + `10_ s Miles ,P a T N. .- di `" r L =� Ala L. N �- 25200 29000 46, ( 28000- !` II.27500 ��' "ma ?CM 30600 35200 38300 LAKEVIL E' f L 37600 - 32800 I CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update ;:: Transportation 8-20 AppValley Capacity Assessment of the roadway type. Figures 8.8 and 8.9 illus- Some of these roadways are under Dakota Coun- trate the existing (2014) and future (2040) capaci- ty jurisdiction and are major transportation corri- As noted on the City's website, the development ty deficiencies within the community. Several dors within the county highway system. of Apple Valley has included a well-planned sys- tem of streets that fulfill travel desires of residents segments of county facilities are currently expert- Overall, the local roadway system within the City and employees in the City. However, as the City encing and/or are projected to experience capaci- has been designed to serve local transportation ty deficiencies. Existing roadways that are near needs. Conflicts can result when re tonal traffic nears full development, issues have arisen re- g their design capacity include the following:garding roadway capacity and safety. To gain a uses local roads as alternative routes. The local clearer understanding of the primary areas of • I-35E from west City limits (140th Street)to roads used as relievers to the regional system concern regarding roadway capacity constraints, north City limits (TH 77) are typically those that serve a collector road- an assessment of the existing and forecast oper- • CSAH 38(McAndrew Road W)from CSAH 31 way function. Residential property owners along ational concerns through the community has been (Pilot Knob Road)to east City limits these routes recognize the increase in traffic when completed using the existing (2014) and 2040 • CSAH 31 (Pilot Knob Road)from CSAH 38 congestion on the regional system occurs. This traffic forecast data. (McAndrew Road W to north City limits increase in traffic can create conflicts with those • CSAH 31 (Pilot Knob Road)from 140th Street residential land uses. Although the City recogniz- Existing and Forecast Roadway Capacity De- es that collector roads may be used in this man- ficiencies to south City limits ner, some methods can be employed to discour- • CSAH 42 (150th Street)from CSAH 31 (Pilot e the use of these roadways byregional traffic. To assess capacity deficiencies, existing (2014) Knob Road)to west City limits age y and forecast(2040)traffic volumes were reviewed, • along with design capacity guidelines. For exam- CSAH 46(160th Street)from east City limits to west City limits ple, traffic operations data indicates that two-lane roadways begin to experience noticeable prob- • 140th Street from TH 77 to CSAH 31 (Pilot lems once traffic volumes exceed approximately Knob Road) 10,000 trips per day. • Galaxie Avenue from 140th Street to 147th The capacity thresholds presented in Table 8.6 Street were used to identify segments of roadway that are either nearing capacity or exceeding capacity CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Transportation 8-21 p`PPValley Table 8.6 Roadway Capacity Guidelines Under Capacity I Near Capacity Over Capacity Planning Level Daily Capacity' Facility Type Ranges(AADT) B I D F 0.6 I 0.85 1.0 >1.0 Two-lane undivided urban 8,000 - 10,000 2,000 6.000 8,500 10.000 10,000 Two-lane undivided rural 14,000 - 15,000 3,000 6,000 9,000 12,750 15,000 > 15,000 Two-lane divided urban 14,000 - 17,000 3,400 6,800 10,200 14,450 17,000 > 17,000 (Three-lane) Four-lane undivided urban 18,000 - 22,000 4,400 8,800 13,200 18,700 22,000 >22,000 Four-lane undivided rural 24,000- 28,000 5,600 11,200 16,800 23,800 28,000 >28,000 Four-lane divided urban(Five-lane) 28,000- 32,000 6,400 12,800 19,200 27,200 32,00( 32,000 Four-lane divided rural 35,000- 38,000 7,600 15,200 22,800 32,300 38,000 >38,000 Four-lane expressway rural 45,000 9,000 18,000 27,000 38,250 45,00( >45,000 Four-lane freeway 60,000- 80,000 16,000 32,000 48,000 68,000 80,000 >80,000 Six lane freeway 90,000- 120,000 24,000 48,000 72,000 102,000 > 120,000 Source: Highway Capacity Manual,Twin Cities Regional Travel Demand Model,and SRF Consulting Group CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Transportation 8-22 Apple Fi.ure 8.8 Existin. Roadwa Deficiencies EAGAN L.L a. 77 35E '� pi ii:,, ,,, ,4_ ` � E► e ;� 4 ram. r-,,,,,, ,I. , '3 8/ iii I* CI /4, ll'_,14. AP* r 1 la Pirell OP -, lieffplilik 31 mIP Tor r4 1 p r".., i %is i l_Pfi rl. .o a "1 ri:II 17 4 I � 1 M" !ill r APPLj14I . ce VALLE Airs" .gob ��n. Le end 0roi _ � .. Nytefivi Near Capacity(0.85-1.00) 'OWWm v 7L, Ask- � Over Capacity(>1.00) ���� + ` al utti. diki S Apple Valley OM Municipal Boundaries Mega ��1��� -It `, ��� 0 0.5 1 1� ' —i��! r Miles e �\ 101/ 1 LAKEVILLE ten., CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update ;::.:; Transportation 8-23 AppVailey Fi.ure 8.9 Forecast Year 2040 Roadwa Deficiencies EAGAN *7./ .. "All 460 Nte i I I lw a al I In 1 I I Pi pp 111 zio „en Bpi"? di PAWS co xi of 1St A L_ IIP OOP „3p./ iii a //APPOI 11)14 1111 3m oP-E-N'illiNliftil- gr p M r, dm 111=11,1.4301411‘ ' 4 r ii: ___IFTLmm..:11 -veigilill la arc, . �� id f , _ 0 =°11,AMiAty Ii"ma ff 1 +0 1 APPLE Wg FA1 ai11t° ce VALLEY & lLl iISnE Legend I IllrMo irIA M ■nI�e . ■.� 9 42 42 ligk Near Capacity(0.85-1.00) gri � isr_ �� Over Capacity( 1.00) ASO° n y� $4 It Apple Valley ami • Municipal Boundaries NW , � . r7 0 0.5 1 omiA 'PApiliel Miles _Argd � ' �L� :\ �*i , ' mind LAKEVILLE CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update ;:::; Transportation 8-24 Apple Safety Assessment intersections. Since these are major county roads To provide local context, the top 10 local intersec- In addition to capacity issues, roadway safety is and highways, it is assumed that most of the tion locations with the highest frequency of a major concern and a priority for all jurisdictional crashes on these facilities occur during the morn- crashes between 2006 and 2015 are listed in Ta- levels. Crash locations and statistics for the City ing (6:00 a.m. - 10 a.m.) and evening (3:00 p.m. - ble 8.8. An additional five years of data was re- are recorded in MnDOT's crash mapping software 7:00 p.m.) rush hour periods when traffic volumes viewed for these locations to cover the time- are are higher and more conflicts occur. period since the last comprehensive transporta- (MnCMAT).A five-year reporting period beginning January 1, 2011 and ending December 31, 2015 Overall,the crash frequency on local city streets is tion plan review. was utilized in this assessment. Reported crashes relatively moderate. A more rigorous investigation during this time-period are listed in Table 8.7. of crash rates, types, and severity for all the top Table 8.8 Top 10 Local Intersection Crash Lo- crash locations in Apple Valley is suggested prior cations in Apple Valley 2006-2015 (By Fre- Most crashes occur along Pilot Knob Road/150th quency of Crashes) Street, Pilot Knob Road/CSAH 46 (160th Street) to drawing conclusions regarding appropriate cor- Cedar Avenue/150th Street and at County Road rective measures. As improvements in these cor- Total Intersection ridors and intersections are considered, these Crashes safety concerns should be explored more thor- ill 153rd Street and Garrett Avenue 60 oughly. ® 140th Street and Galaxie Avenue 62 Table 8.7 Motor Vehicle Crashes in Apple Valley 2011 to 2015 ® 147th Street and Pennock Avenue 43 4 140th Street and Johnny Cake Ridge 37 Personal Injury Crashes Road Property Year Fatal Type A Inca- Type B Non- Type C Damage Total Crashes ® 147th Street and Galaxie Avenue 46 pacitating In- Incapacitating Possible Injury 6. 138th Street and Glendale Court 32 jury Injury 1/1 151st Street and Galaxie Avenue 30 2011 2 8 33 163 327 533 8. 157th Street and Galaxie Avenue 32 2012 2 8 34 136 331 511 2013 1 4 27 128 366 526 9. 158th Street and Frisian Lane 12 2014 0 4 29 145 440 618 10 158th Street and Galaxie Avenue/ 12 2015 2 6 28 130 369 535 Garret Drive Totals 7 30 151 702 1,833 2,723 Source:Apple Valley Source:Apple Valley CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Transportation 8-25 APR1/alley Access Management through the measures listed above. For refer- Right-of-Way Preservation ence, MnDOT's Highway Access Category Sys- Access management is an important aspect of There are many different techniques available to tern and Spacing Guidelines can be found at: providing a safe and efficient roadway network. protect right-of-way corridors for future road im- Access management measures include: https://www.dot.state. povements. The basic approaches can be sum- • Providing adequate spacing between access mn.us/accessmanagement/resources.html marized as follows: points and intersecting streets to separate and Traffic Calming • Land acquisition (purchase of easements, title reduce conflicts purchase, and eminent domain). In general, Traffic calming is the management of traffic to land acquisition is an approach applied when • Limiting the number of driveway access points q pp pp to reduce conflicts improve safety not only for vehicles, but other specific improvements are eminent. The ap- users of the roadway such as pedestrians and plicability of acquisition is directly linked to the • Aligning access with other existing access points cyclists. Management techniques include the availability of funding. physical modification of the street to divert non- • Landowner agreements (development agree- • Sharing access points, through internal con- local traffic off local roadways and influence the ments, transferable development rights). nectivity between property owners behavior of drivers using the street, particularly to Landowner agreements are often limited in ef- • Encouraging indirect access rather than direct lower the vehicle speed. The objective is to fectiveness when dealing with a large project access to high volume arterial roads achieve a traffic behavior pattern that is compati- area. They are applied on a parcel-by-parcel • Constructing parallel roads and frontage roads ble with other appropriate street activities and ad- basis and are most effective when dealing • Implementing sight distance guidelines to jacent land uses. with larger land holdings and when specific improve safety Examples of traffic calming measures include improvements are eminent. • Using channelization to manage and control narrow streets, roundabouts, medians, curb ex- • Land use regulations (development exactions, turning movements tensions (bump-outs), crosswalks, and entry setback ordinances, official map, subdivision treatments. The City will review these techniques regulations). Land use regulation techniques • Meeting these requirements while also main- are facilitated through the comprehensive taining appropriate access to local businesses during the design process for local road construc- planning process. Certain regulations such as tion and reconstruction to determine if they are ap- Access review is a major aspect of the City's de- setback ordinances can be applied communi- propriate. Traffic calming measures will generally ty-wide while others such as official velopment review process. The goal is to maintain Y- maps are be considered for local streets only if: typically developed for individual corridors and safety and adequate capacity of the City's road- yp Y p ways while providing adequate land access. Most• The measure selected is consistent with the require a more significant level of corridor defi- road-ways serve accessibility and mobility func- problem being addressed. nition. tions to some degree based on their functional • The measure will not divert traffic onto other • Access management (limiting curb cuts, re- localclassification. The City will continue to support streets or degrade public safety. verse lot frontage). Access management prin- MnDOT and Dakota County Access Management• State Aid Design Standards are met, if applica- cipals should be a centerpiece of anycommu- guidelines on the roadway network in the City ble. nity's transportation plan. To be successful, CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Transportation 8-26 APPValley it is important that the guidelines are applied that allowed outer-ring suburbs to"opt-out"of cen- other social services. It is funded by Dakota Coun- consistently and uniformly at the time platting trally provided transportation services. The MVTA ty, donations, and receives Performance Based occurs. operates peak express service to downtown Min- Funding Grants from the Metropolitan Council. In summary, the applicability of these options is neapolis and downtown St. Paul, local crosstown service, and reverse commute express bus ser- funding, Transit Facilities dependent on many factors including available p the immediacy of development, and the vices. MVTA also operates the METRO Red Line Park and Ride timing of the need for the road improvements. Bus Rapid Transit service. MVTA operates three park and ride facilities in Transit System MVTA currently operates several bus routes along Apple Valley where passengers may park their Apple Valley's principal and minor arterial routes. cars free of charge and board a bus, carpool or As designated by the Metropolitan Council, Apple Current routes include 420 Local Flex Route, van- pool. The park and ride facilities include the Valley is in the Metropolitan Transit Taxing District, 440 and 442 Local Route, 475-476-477-478-479 Apple Valley Transit Station, the Palomino Hills and is composed of three Transit Market Areas: II, Minneapolis Express, and 480 St. Paul Express Park & Ride Lot, and the 157th Street Station. III, and Emerging Market Area IV. Market Area II Route. Bus service is more frequent during the features limited stop service to connect major des- a.m. and p.m. peak commute times, with only a Apple Valley Transit Station, established in 1998 tinations and a network of local routes with mod- few Express Routes offering trips in the middle of and located on Cedar Avenue by 155th Street W, erate level of service and frequency. Service op- the day. features 750 parking spaces both in structured tions for Transit Market Area III include peak-only and surface parking. The facility also includes an express, small vehicle circulators, midday circula- Demand-Response Service indoor climate-controlled waiting area, restrooms, tors, special needs paratransit (ADA, seniors), Unique transit needs in the community are pre- and bike lockers and bike racks. Furthermore, the and ridesharing. Figure 8.10 illustrates current sented by populations housed in group quarters parking deck connects to a pedestrian bridge, transit system routes, stops, and support facilities and facilities that offer specialty care services for which crosses over Cedar Avenue to a METRO in Apple Valley (described in greater detail in the temporarily or permanently disabled populations Red Line station. Per Metro Transit's 2016 Park next section). and seniors. The transit needs of these popula- and Ride System Report, the Apple Valley Transit tions are varied and are typically provided by Station is at capacity and relies on overflow lots Existing Transit System to meet consumer demand. Bus routes 420, 440, specialized paratransit providers that offer ex- Bus Service press or demand-response services, such as the 442, 475, 477, and 480 serve this station, as well Metro Mobility program administered by the Met- as the METRO Red Line. Transit service in Apple Valley is provided by the ropolitan Council. Dial-a-ride service for seniors Palomino Hills Park & Ride Lot opened in 1993 Minnesota Valley Transit Authority (MVTA). The and per- sons with disabilities is also provided by and is located just west of Cedar Avenue and MVTA is an independent transportation agency for Dakota Area Resources and Transportation for south of Palomino Drive on Pennock Avenue.The the cities of Apple Valley, Burnsville, Eagan, Rose- Seniors (DARTS). DARTS is a non-profit that park and ride facility features 318 parking spaces, mount and Savage formed under state legislation provides demand responsive services for sen- a heated shelter, bike lockers, and a newspaper iors among CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Transportation 8-27 APPValley rack. The station predominantly serves residents Table 8.9 Park & Ride Capacity and Usage Metro bypass allows a bus to enter the highway in the northern part of Apple Valley. In the past five 2013 -2016 without waiting for metered passenger traffic. years, the Park and Ride experienced above 75 Apple Valley Palomino 157th Park There is one-meter bypass in Apple Valley, enter- percent utilization; however, recently utilization fell Transit Park and and Ride ing Cedar Avenue northbound from Palomino below 60 percent. Bus routes 440, 476, 477 and Station Ride Drive. 480 serve this park and ride facility. Capacity 768 318 258 Travel Demand Management The 157th Street Station opened in 2006 and is located on Pilot Knob Road between CSAH 46 2013 Use 758 99% 272 86% 164 44% Travel demand management (TDM) is a set of (160th Street) and 157th Street next to Quarry techniques used to reduce peak period vehicle Point Park. This station features 250 parking 2014 Use 818 107% 250 79% 32 12% trips by shifting travelers from driving alone into s aces, an indoor climate-controlled waitingarea, o 0 o shared ride arrangements or by encouraging al- p 2015 Use 759 99/0 256 81/0 29 11/o a restroom and bike lockers. As shown in Table ternative work arrangements, such as flextime 8.9, the station experiences low park and ride uti- 2016 Use 767 99% 188 59% 18 7% and telecommuting, which remove trips from the lization relative to previous years. The utilization peak travel times. Travel demand management Source: 2016 Park and Ride System Report (Jan 2017), 2015 techniques are best implemented through a part- may re- bound with the redevelopment of Or- Park and Ride System Report(Mar 2016), 2014 Park and Ride chard Place, located north of the station. Routes System Report(March 2015). nership of cities, regional and state agencies, and 477 and 479 serve the 157th Street Station. employers to encourage travelers to change their Bus Stop and Stations behavior through incentives, enhanced services, Stations along the METRO Red Line feature in- and high occupancy facilities. door climate-controlled shelters with electronic Ridesharing is a travel demand management tool signage displaying arrival times. All stations have being used in Apple Valley to include Metro Corn- a similar design featuring a sinuous roofline and muter Services, which provides carpool-matching large windows thus, visually uniform and easy to services to employers and individuals. identify. The City supports travel demand management to Transit Advantages alleviate congestion on roadways within the City. Bus-only shoulders allow buses to use the road- The City will encourage transit-friendly design way shoulder to bypass automobiles that are in and employer participation in travel demand the general-purpose lanes. Implemented as part management in the development review process. of the METRO Red Line project, the METRO Red The City will work with businesses within the Line now uses shoulders along Cedar Avenue in community to encourage the development of vol- situations where the commuter traffic is slower untary travel demand management programs. than 35 miles an hour. Development plans will also be reviewed to en- CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Transportation 8-28 App1/alley sure transit s accommodated where it is feasible. Park and Ride Facilities sit promotion and transit alternatives, like carpool- ing. Along this line, the City staff can connect Programmed or Planned Improvements Improvements associated with the METRO Red Line include a study of parking expansion at the employers, especially new firms, to the planning METRO Red Line and services offered by MVTA and DARTS. Col- Palomino Park and Ride with a conceptual station labo- ration between employers and transit pro- Improvements associated with the METRO Red envisioned, described in detail in the previous sec- viders may include better facilities and reverse Line include an initial study for the Palomino Sta- tion. commute options, among others. tion. The station concept design is confronted by The 157th Street Park and Ride will need to be space constraints largely caused bythe Cedar A call for higher density housing within a half-mile p 9 Y monitored for performance and adequacy as plan- AvenueOr- entrance and exit ramps at Palomino of a station and corridor-wide station area e chard Place fills with new development. Drive/127th Street West. To remediate the cur- Wing is included in the Cedar Avenue Corridor Apple Valley Transit Station currently has 750 Transitway Implementation Plan Update. To help rent space limitations, an alternative concept de- parkin spaces in both structured and surface sign that includes removing the entrance and exit p gguide transit oriented development near stations, parking. Due to consistent peak capacity, expan- Apple Valley can complete station area plans. ramps was explored in the Cedar Avenue Corridor sion may be warranted. Transitway Implementation Plan Update (2015). The concept design would create enough space Future Transit Opportunities for the METRO Red Line to safely reach stations The City of Apple Valley may directly work with and create more parking spaces to supplement in- MVTA and DARTS to influence the decisions of creased use at the Palomino Park and Ride. these organizations. The City may also weigh in The expansion may include as many as 700 new, on the planning and management of the METRO dedicated spaces to support ridership at the Pal- Red Line. The City should continue to fully en- omino METRO Red Line Station. The expansion gage in the decision-making processes within is in response to a market study that showed the these organizations and programs to ensure an need for more park and ride opportunities in the effective and high-level transit service in the City. northern part of Apple Valley in 2011. There has With the redevelopment at Orchard Place and been difficulty acquiring land near the 140th Street welcoming of hundreds of new jobs, there should and 147th Street Stations to support a park and be a focus on inviting large employers to engage ride. in TDM measures. Employers can assist with tran- CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Transportation 8-29 APPValley Figure 10. Existing Transit Service • . / , , I — �— I \ , • Jo. A 77 111 wrolleig4,r(P).,A . , _EAGAII • / ' 0 r .-1,-7N-4o :.W� ly ;of IFF.p" 492 �� °� a„kiblW Al ' � /rji r► _ A Z ItA_ < immvigeigo ti ro MCANDREWS RD , c -mie 1' 1. m OfilillaWeirmir4791 IW �tio 1.---- v w �rfi R s Iti.oprf I mg lift, 140th St 00INS r e n \v-- 1 --it _iismi ai•h.gai;401 vaiLisMisf %MAIM E' Legend 0 I .r, k, ai ;.,„, • Transit Station !� ,� ,I IL1. APPLE �1 rot.1 �� ® Proposed Transit Station i`i VALLEY J� 0 Park and Ride • m I,/`:O mu _420 m to 'tires, ` v 1tiff/, ' MI Y METRO Red Line �� ,� ■P� - ' — • •■ Red Line Extension fir— ��'+ 150TH ST W .,.'� i ■ r • Bus Stops ■ p fi Tra nsiValley Transit Transit Routes �;StationFuture"Crosstown"Transit Servicel's— I•a Mtn - ` - Future"North-South"Transit ServiceMINIUM nib � f II "Or ,�_ s — Emerging Market Area II _ + i rd SP Mg =l1,V �■�� . .' Transit Market Area III II { �1W Transit Market Area IV �. 12 J/01.16 ��� 160TH ST'W�ur! di-ill :11Fral Transit Market Area V OVA J 'J LAKEVIL-L-E �� �L ki ~ • 'rj ' , 0 0.5 1 Miles 1 Municipal Boundaries �r M �1 r IIII�/ J IL/1 '—" CITY OF APPLE VALLEY i 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Transportation 8-30 Apple. Pedestrian and Bicycle Facili- 2010 BikeWalk Apple Valley priority for funding. They provide connections ties In 2010, the City of Apple Valley produced Bike- to regional facilities in neighboring cities, and Walk Apple Valley, a trail and sidewalkplan de- transportation to connect priority regional bicycle Increasingly, pedestrian and bicycle facilities in pp corridors and alignments. the City are serving the dual role of providing rec- signed to inform and improve alternative trans- reational value as well as viable options for corn- portation and multimodal connectivity. BikeWalk The Tier 1 Corridors and Alignments in Apple Val- muters (for work or shopping). A detailed discus- Apple Valley assessed the existing gaps within ley primarily follow a north-south orientation. They sion of pedestrian and bicycle facilities, along the network and offered recommendations. The include connections along Flagstaff Avenue and with the long-range planning for these facilities in following priority areas were included as part of Johnny Cake Ridge Road, and also Cedar Avenue relationship to the community's recreational as- the BikeWalk Apple Valley Plan: Southwest Apple south of CSAH 42 (see Figure 8.11). sets, can be found in the Parks and Recreation Valley, Downtown, and East Central Apple Valley. The Tier 2 Corridors and Alignments intersect the chapter of the Apple Valley Comprehensive Plan. Regional Bicycle Transportation Net- City primarily east-west along CSAH 42 (150th Street W), and CSAH 38 (McAndrews Road) (see The expansion of commuter pedestrian and bi- work(RBTN) Figure 8.11). cyclist use is expected into the future with the ex- The RBTN was developed as an outcome to the pansion of transit facilities and expected contin- There are no major physical barriers to overcome Regional Bicycle System Study and serves as a Tonal or local networks. ued increases in automobile use costs. Thus, pe- on regional framework of designated regional corridors and destrian and bicyclist system improvements will alignments and defines critical bicycle transporta- need to focus on enhancing connections between tion links to help municipalities guide their bikeway neighborhoods and the primary roadway system planning and development. The RBTN is subdi- and the commercial areas of the City. vided into two tiers for regional planning and in- Bicycle and pedestrian accessibility to existing vestment prioritization: and planned transit corridors and transit facilities 1. Tier 1 — Priority Regional Bicycle Transporta- will be greatly enhanced within Apple Valley with tion Corridors and Alignments. These cord- the Cedar Avenue BRT Improvements. As previ- dors and alignments have been determined ously noted, BRT offers passengers the option to to provide the best transportation connectivity bring a bicycle along to complete their trip to a to regional facilities and developed areas, and nearby destination. Furthermore, the Draft Dako- are given the highest priority for transportation to County Transit Plan notes that, "The condition funding. of [bike and pedestrian trails] within a half-mile around a transit station or stop can have a high 2. Tier 2 - Regional Bicycle Transportation Net- impact on the user friendliness and access to work Corridors and Alignments. These corri- transit services." dors and alignments are the second highest CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Transportation 8-31 APR Valley Figure 11. Existing Pedestrian and Bicycle System EAGAN i ♦ School of Environmental Studies Lebanon Valleywood _ Q Hills Park Golf Course / • �. MN Zoo O • �, C / I -, tom"/' z il _MCANDREWS RD ii o .` I G �J _-- ff ‘) et-- 0 /ems ill • \\ J ir 1, i \ g IL i -lull r., ilf. APPLE VALLEY m __ __ Q EASTVIEW SR. 0 APPLE 112 FA •Johnny VALLEY SR. U i� I I Cake Ridge W A I Johnny•t L Park East O Cake Ridge �L I Park West Aquatic o II_ 1 Legend Hayes Sports I 7 ��/ Center CC 0 Complex I �� III ca O Sidewalks I • ri =� r 1- Pathways 1``` Co Rd 42 and o Proposed Trail _ )I Cedar Avenue, s I O • Apple Valley El: Il Highly Visited Regional Parks 11) O 150TH ST W n 42 _ • Subregional Job Centers i' x \ t - Major Schools I )�� I `r m il "---11 I -t _ • Major Sport&Entertainment Centers / 1( RBTN Tier 1 Alignment RBTN Tier 2 Alignment I I I I ( I� `♦ RBTN Tier 1 Corridor _Quarry .n i I I '���It-Point Park rk _--_, RBTN Tier 2 Corridor _ O. t t Apple Valley — ,46' 11 1 160TH ST W L— I I ` t 00 Municipal Boundaries LAKEVILLE 0 0.5 1 Miles r CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 1 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Transportation 8-32 AppValley Aviation These forms must be submitted 30 days before Special Purpose Facilities - Seaplane alteration/construction begins or the construction Lake The City of Apple Valley does not have public air- permit is filed, whichever is earlier. MnDOT must port facilities within its jurisdiction. However, the Lake Alimagnet is designated in Minnesota State also be notified (see MnDOT Rules Chapter City is located south of the Minneapolis-St. Paul pur- 8800).The MSP airport/community zoning board's Rules Chapter 8800.2800 as authorized for(MSP) International Airport, which is owned and poses of safe seaplane use. Lake Alimagnet is land use safety zoning ordinance should also be operated by the Metropolitan Airports Commission approximately 100 acres in size with adjacent considered when reviewing construction in the City (MAC). The City is located outside of the desig- land uses including parks around the west, south that raises potential aviation conflicts. nated Airport Influence Area for MSP. The MAC and southwest sides, and residential uses along opened an 8,000-foot north-south runway (Run- The City of Apple Valley zoning ordinance does the east side of the lake. Figure 8.12 shows the way 17/35) on October 27, 2005 which distributes not permit buildings to be constructed to a height location of the FAA Radar Dome and Lake Ali- arriving and departing aircraft in airspace over of 200 feet or taller, nor do any buildings exceed magnet. Apple Valley. Apple Valley's distance from MSP that height now. buffers it from being included in the MAC's 2007 City of Apple Valley Ordinance Section 155.385, noise policy area as well as the MAC's most re- Towers and Antennas Site Design and Mainte- cent noise contour study completed in 2016. nance, controls the development and construction Airspace Protection of objects affecting navigable airspace including construction exceeding 200 feet. Currently the According to the Federal Aviation Administration tallest structure in the City is a 150-foot commu- (FAA) and MnDOT Aeronautics safety standards, nications tower located on private property. any applicant who proposes to construct a struc- ture 200 feet above the ground level must get ap- Aviation Support Facilities - FAA Ra- propriate approval. The FAA requires that FAA dar Dome Form 7460-1 "Notice of Proposed Construction or An FAA Long-Range Radar facility is located at Alteration", under code of federal regulations 13591 Harwell Path, Apple Valley. The radar was CFR-Part 77, be filed for any proposed structure constructed in 1958 before the surrounding resi- or alteration that exceeds 200 feet. FAA Form dential area was built up around it. There are no 7460-1 can be obtained from the FAA headquar- current land use conflicts between the radar facili- ters and regional offices. ty and the neighboring residential area. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Transportation 8-33 APPValley Fi.ure 8.12 Aeronautics EAGAN 2 of 0 -#i a,w11,1i 1 7ikg3 •h rere k,t s.,I I 35E 'J38 .aiLI.N.frITI ppAi • P 7� 4 MGANDREWSTRD 4 , f a%4&4 i0 k1t41 (1) espOW,,, •401Pril Fr.gin no' ',Vim,/ 0:6•41.16 "go EigittrAillk m vaialiprei '93-1.I 4, fil(t ik / ir ..„, r•-• win 1,1 itii g s f Aiimagnef t 1 . ¢P� 4 , Y M Z raketi) 0 rb O El 1 4' 4 _—L� , a _ u) APPLE ��P lege ill 1011 r �� �� ii� VALLEY r 11.1 =AIM& ... 33/ VLH raft 150TH ST W ���� 6,42J W Legend 1� �.,-ir, H1 .3 / P- .- Alta ` V�� 0 FAA Radar Dome M Sea Plane LakeUr�_� ��e t VPIlif 1 Lo Apple Valley _ I� W7 msoTH ST�W; Ir 46 !� �4E Municipal Boundaries LAKEVILLE �n CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Transportation 8-34 AppValley Freight and Heavy Commercial to improve truck, motorist, and non-motorized ve- conducting site plan reviews for new develop- hicle safety and traffic flow. Vehicles ments and/or redevelopments. Typical examples include driveways or ap- Figure 8.13 shows the existing freight network According to a recent report prepared by MnDOT proaches to loading zones for retail stores or in- and the impact of Heavy Commercial Average entitled "Trucks and Twin Cities Traffic Manage- and the impact of Heavy Commercial Average dustrial buildings where inadequate maneuvering Annual Daily Traffic (HCAAT) volumes on the Ap- ment", one of the top-ranking strategies to reduce and turning space causes safety conflicts be- ple Valley roadway network.This figure also identi- congestion for trucks traveling within and through tween the rear tires of an off-track trailer and the fies known areas of likely heavy commercial vehi- the Twin Cities is to provide design guidance to access way it is intended to use. Pedestrians ap- cle traffic (refer to commercial, mixed use com- local governments for accommodating trucks on proaching a driveway intersection on a sidewalk mercial, and industrial areas shown on Figure local roads. A copy of the 2005 technical report is may not suspect a truck's approaching off-tracked 8.13). There are not any defined routes for gravel available on the MnDOT web site at: rear tires. In addition, damages to public infra- truck freight in the City; however, all county roads http://www.dot.state.mn.us/ofrw/PDF/trucksTCT structure can also result (broken curbs and land- provide proper weight limits to facilitate move- M2005 21.pdf. scaping destruction). Inadequate truck queuing ment of goods and services effectively and effi- can also be a problem, requiring temporary on- ciently within the City of Apple Valley.There are no This strategy was adopted by MnDOT and in- street parking. local roadway issues or problem areas for the cludes ongoing guidance updates and training. The guidance is intended to help local govern- An assessment of industrial and commercial truck movement of goods through Apple Valley. ments identify locations where land uses currently ingress/egress areas in Apple Valley should be (or are likely to)generate heavy truck movements, performed for properties where such issues have present unique traffic control needs, and demon- been observed for reasons associated with safety, strate concerns for local street pavement and ge- operational efficiencies, and infrastructure ometric design to accommodate heavy truck di- preservation. In addition, the MnDOT guidance mensions and weight. The guidance can be used will pro-vide support to the City of Apple Valley in CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Transportation 8-35 p`PPValley Fi.ure 8.13 Existin• Frei.ht and Heav Commercial S stem EAGAN loofr4 --Ni 4.6a -,-00010 a.Fi 3 irephirillin Fen - -'5 litiN m � Woo ti n (..., PI ke ,.48 Nair � Iiiii 11411511i1 ° M ,�rvo- e Ro A1, p-...' 14 gen1 ori i 6 .1:3 d° m ass ..0w. .iia 3. 1100 . VG IL g f ‘,I ,qt, ..14, ‘ 5tb al:w, l F irg •••,,,Lr tv.va i *ire Z 0 llrall 1 Ur Al E. 1 SW Li L . 41 APPLEr 4 2 6. _ ,,)VALLEY ` walhiroth. 33 Legend �� ��� l� i Nur . Current liCAALIT 11 , Inpil, � 3�r 500 500-2,000 �. ' 1 DTFi"ST VJ i. BM lic ilr nor}-A 750 -A.l59-r Sao Wrift.64 . WO ■i MI,. 41116mMj SIM: kit lid Apple Valley I ir Land Ube a �MMM ,1RThr. kl-:fir '; Commercial r n Industrial11111: C _ • M W 1 mina use Commercial r :fir H ST' t je ;` ��� Municipal Boundaries LAKEVILLE 1: t Railfaade 0 0.5 1 Wes CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Transportation 8-36 Apple Transportation Plan Recom- lane roadway to a three-lane roadway with Roundabout at 153rd and Johnny Cake Ridge mendations right turn lanes at major intersections from Road CSAH 38 (McAndrews Road)to 140th Street. • Roundabouts at 148th and 149th and Johnny This section summarizes the improvements iden- • Traffic Signals Cake Ridge Road tified through this transportation planning process. With the implementation of these recommends- • Traffic Signal Reconstruction atCSAH • Dodd Boulevard—from 155th Street to County tions the City's transportation system will be able 42 and Hayes Avenue Road 33/Diamond Path. to effectively and safely accommodate anticipated • Traffic Signal Reconstruction atCSAH • CSAH 42—from west City boundary to growth and the needs of its residents, employers, 42 and Garden View Drive CSAH 31, consider capacity expansion. and prospective developers. The specific timing • Traffic Signal Reconstruction atCSAH • CSAH 46—from west City boundary to east of the recommendations will be defined based 42 and Pennock Avenue City boundary, consider capacity expansion. on available funding, continued coordination with These roadways should be monitored over time •the City'spartners (Dakota County, MnDOT, and Traffic Signal Reconstruction atCSAH Y Y for significant congestion issues developing. neighboring communities), and through the devel- 42 and Elm Drive Traffic Signal Reconstruction atCSAH Furthermore, in recognition of increasing opera- opment of future Capital Improvement Programs. 9 42 and Southcross Drive tional and safety issues associated with the lane Roadway Network Recommendations drop on northbound Cedar Avenue at 138th Street, • Traffic Signal Reconstruction atCSAH the City strongly encourages MnDOT to construct Several roadway improvements have been identi- 42 and Garrett Avenue a third traffic lane north from 138th Street.The City fied. The recommendations are organized by • Traffic Signal Construction at Johnny has identified this as a priority issue to address in those that have been programmed (funded) and Cake Ridge Road and Upper 147th the near future. those that should be implemented in the future as Street issues arise. Safety Improvements • Traffic Signal Construction at Galaxie Programmed Improvements(funded) Avenue and 132nd Street The following City street intersections should be monitored over time to determine whether safety • Construction of a roundabout at the intersec- • Median/Access Modification at Elm tion of CSAH 33 (Diamond Path) and 140th concerns increase and intersection improvements Drive and Redwood Drive Street with Dakota County. should be pursued: • Convert CSAH 38 (McAndrews Road) from Planned Improvements(non-funded) • 140th Street/Galaxie Avenue; two-lane roadway to a three-lane roadway • Extend Johnny Cake Ridge Road (from Coun- • 147th Street/Galaxie Avenue; with right turn lanes at major intersections ty Road 42 to 157th Street). • 157th Street/Galaxie Avenue; from CSAH 31 (Pilot Knob Road) to TH 3 in • Extend 153rd Street to the east to connect • 153rd Street/Garrett Avenue; and Rosemount with Dakota County. with 155th Street at Pilot Knob Road. • • Convert Johnny Cake Ridge Road from four- 147th Street/Foliage Avenue. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Transportation 8-37 APPValley • Galaxie Avenue at Greenleaf School Pedes- south transit service along County Road 31 recreational aspects of pedestrian and bicy- trian Improvements (HAWK Signal) (Pilot Knob Road). cle use and the increasing commuter use to Specific recommendations at these intersections • In addition, the City should continue its pro- include addressing the need for enhanced will be identified after a more rigorous investiga- active planning efforts with respect to transit amenities such as bike racks, bike lockers, tion of crash rates, types, and severity is con- oriented development to support the Red Line and bike lanes in and around shopping areas ducted at each location. BRT system. and transit stations. Pedestrian and Bicycle FacilityRec- • Continue to connect "gaps" in sidewalk and Transit Service Recommendations Ytrail networks ommendations The primary transit improvement recommenda- • Construction of Trails along the following tions are listed below. To attain a pedestrian and bicycle system that roadways best addresses the changing needs of the resi- • South side of 140th Street from Construct a three mile extension of the • METRO Red Line BRT system to include dents, the City will need to continue pursuing op- Galaxie Avenue to Cedar Avenue threeportunities for system enhancements. Potential new stations from Apple Valley to Lake- opportunities include: • South side of CSAH 38 (McAndrews ville. Road)from Galaxie Avenue to Gar- • • Expand the existing facilities at the Palomino Focusing on the pedestrian and bicycle needs denview Hills Park-and-Ride and the Apple Valley during the development of roadway im- provement projects; and • Work with Dakota County to continue to build Transit Station and Park-and-Ride. the North Creek Greenway in accordance with •• Coordinate with the MVTA regarding future Ensuring future development and reeve- d the approved Master Plan. "crosstown" transit routes along County Road opment in the City accommodates both the 42 and County Road 46 and expanded north- CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Transportation 8-38 p`PPValley 9. Water Resources r� k- _ - .' , The future prosperity of Apple Valley depends on wise water - ' �' �`;' •- , ;; ' tr ` ;;,• management. A sustainable quantity and quality of water re •. �. 1:-4., , 1-,. ,�, , ,' sources is an essential part of the City's quality of life, and is ti• �;t. _ .. -.! vital for growth and development to occur.The Water Resources • p' chapter provides a framework for managing three aspects of the # .,�,;•''-`±3-; :y6 municipal water system: Surface Water Management , = r _i s - • Sanitary Sewer . ,w. :.i r, Water Supply . - Illirl i _ ... -- - The Surface Water Management Plan (Page 9-2) serves as a - guide for managing the surface water system, includinglakes, 9 9 Y � , _____J1NILL„ ponds, wetlands, and the City's stormwater system,which con- veys runoff from the landscape to receiving waters down- _ - -_ „`- ._..• -' stream.The Sanitary Sewer section (Page 9-9)conforms to the :,;. .•- ;V_ ; :- --.., z -.- ; , •: g •.^i,_ , Twin Cities regional 2040 Water Resources Policy Plan, ensur- "Illml,_, r. .. `g ti:• '_ _ in that Apple Valleywill have sufficient wastewater capacity for -' " _•=' 1 � � ' ? `' .e ,. : r�- :;4;,; _ _ •` serve future growth, and that adequate wastewater infra-struc- �` ..A �-' :;° ^-' � ; ••: • • • LL • ture will be available in the locations that are planned for devel- • t ';''•; ?•.'.'5', r:, opment. This section serves as an inventory of the City's sani- i • . tary trunk facilities and a guide for completing the few remaining ' - ., trunk sewer sections. The Water Supply section (Page 9-22) :1- T -}ram' F..� bP - ''�� ' " r ' guides the construction, operation, and maintenance of the mu ""�• ` t''��- .. �: • r ;r nicipal water system,so that Apple Valley will have a safe,clean :_`-.f • . ,,.. . iti ` ,, supply of drinking water now and in the future. r. :,y :.ems .. .t:302 • -•-r CITY OF APPLE VALLEY I 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Water Resources 9-1 Apple Valley proper management of surface and ground including hydrologic, hydraulic, and water quality Surface Water Management water. modeling. The subwatershed divides shown in SWMP Purpose and Scope The SWMP was developed consistent with the Figure 9.1 of the Surface Water Management Plan The City's 2018-2027 Surface Water Management guidance from the Metropolitan Council, and were determined by local topography and the lay- Plan (SWMP) is the third iteration of the City's WMOs with jurisdiction in the City, including the out of the City's stormwater system. Major ele- Vermillion River Watershed Joint Powers Organi- ments of the City's stormwater system are also SWMP and replaces the previous SWMP adopted shown in Figure 9.2 of the Surface Water Manage- by the City in 2008.The purpose of the SWMP is to zation (VRWJPO) and the Black Dog Watershed provide a framework and reference for protecting, Management Organization (BDWMO). ment Plan, including: preserving, and managing the City surface water The City's SWMP includes the following content: • Location and names of designated storm- water ponds and lakes resources and stormwater management system. . Executive Summary summarizing the signifi- The SWMP is a local water management plan pre- cant elements of the SWMP • Boundaries of major and minor watersheds pared in accordance with Minnesota Statute • Introduction describing the purpose and de- • Stormwater trunk lines connecting the pond- 103B.235 and Minnesota Rules 8410. According velopment of the SWMP ing areas to statute, the purposes of these water manage- • Forcemains with flow direction and pipe sizes • Land and Water Resources Inventory describ- ment programs are to: ing the physical conditions in the City • Stormwater structure locations • Protect, preserve,and use natural surface and • Assessment of Issues and Opportunities • Locations where stormwater from the City's groundwater storage and retention systems. • Stormwater System Analysis including water storm drainage system is discharged to an ad- • Minimize public capital expenditures needed jacent community to correct flooding and water quality problems. quality and hydrologic and hydraulic modeling • Goals and Policies As part of SWMP development, the City updated • Identify and plan for means to effectively pro- hydrologic, hydraulic, and water quality modeling tect and improve surface and groundwater ' Implementation Program for the majority of the drainage areas in the City. quality. Existing System Additional information is included in Section 4 of • Establish more uniform local policies and offi- the SWMP. cial controls for surface and groundwater man- The SWMP includes an inventory of the surface agement. water resources and stormwater management in- frastructure located within the City.The City is sub- ,, (, • Prevent erosion of soil into surface water sys- tems. divided into seven major drainage areas including ' ,dik; N -� three drainage areas within the jurisdiction of the • Promote groundwater recharge. BDWMO and four drainage areas within the juris- '44 a. • Protect and enhance fish and wildlife habitat diction of the VRWJPO.The City subdivided these F `*Y. fi ; r 2• ''y � and water recreational facilities. drainage areas into subwatersheds for water re- ., , • Secure the other benefits associated with source management and planning purposes, K CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Water Resources 9-2 APR1/alley Figure 9.1 of the Surface Water Management Plan Eagan Flow Direction Arrow "/ Existing Forcemain WVR-P60 GGL-P2 s'' ,4 WVR-P3 -�' /�/ Existing Storm Sewer WVR-Pi I /� W. PWVR-P2 S, VJVR-P]10 - B U Y n 5 V l l l e ✓J ZOO-Pi Storm Basins BD-P150 VMGC-P2 -J so WVR P] ZOO-P4 / eD-P15 WVR-P11,W x1� VR-P10 NNR-P8 WVR-P]11 zoo-P2 l n Drainage Basin Watershed Ofi BD-814 WO O4 1 R-P12 ZOO-P3 ,E R-P221 j WVR-P11.3 WVR-P9 (;0-P140 BD-P13 ZOO-P1.1,, Pond Watershed . EVR-P220 ' /J WVR-P590 EVR-P190 EOF 59PI9.1 EVR-P4 9 •. BD-P104 WOR-P130 ! WVR-P14 WVR-P58 EVR-P18 EVR-P311 EVR-P22 1 -� 'eD-P120 EVR-P22 /aD-Bb=p1D3 WVR-P13 WVR-RVUkJPA4BJt 90 R P59 EEyVe�S Z p i `_. Municipal Boundary -P11 BD-P70 WVR-P1].3 EVR-P50 BOO-P53K Ey{EpR2P,801 EVR-P20 EVR-P350.1 BD-P10 WVR-P17 EVR-P51 R�P5fi �80-P110 BD-P] R-""fV1E.P1]1 EVR.P50 EVR-P55 Major U Wa�er3 B S BD-P6 BD-P102 BD-P]i WVR- � E�fl413.2 EVR-235 p%tt EVVpP445.,/ BD-PAD-P9 BD-P61 BD-P5 FV R-PSV@WSP053 EVR-P13.1 EVR-P21.3 EYIk EVR 45.� ' Alimagnet Lake B0-P61 WVR-P190 WVR-Pi]iWVR-P11L EVR-P210 yy ✓ BD-P4 WVR-P290 EV RP54 EVR-IPA4RVP212P21 EVR-PA53 BD-PB BD-P101 EVR-P54.1 _ L-P202 BD$0-Pi WVR-P191 WVR-Pia WVR-P30 EVR-P35 WVR-P291 EVR-P66- BlackDog 1 .p20TL-P100 80-P2 WVR-P292 EVRq P13 EVR-P14 EVR-P -P20�'"P1 WVR-P19 WVR-P33.2 E@AR+PT.Y1 East Vermillion River WVR-P33.1 EVR-P12.2 WVR-P21 EVR-P2 EVR-P21 EVR-Pt] L-P2 WVR-P31 EVR-P12.1 EVR-P352t Keller Lake AL-P3 WVR-P3] WVR-P201 WVR-P22 EVR-P].1 EVR-P12 i Rt �y, WOO-Pool WVR-P38 WVR-P202 WVR-P33 WVR-P32 EVR-P1]0 EVR-P34 �.,,. �� EVft-P31 - Lac Lavon Al-P8 lil WVWW*2�ry1VR-P340 i; EVR-P3 EVR-PS EVR-P] EVR-P11 EVR P3 I AAL"P1 ,WVR-P22.2R-P34 W,VR-P35 EVR-PB P16 EVR-P290 EV 2 AL-P] AL-P11 1 �I EVR-"W- y EVR-P10 EVR P30 West Vermillion River WVR-P36 EVR-P6 EVR-P15t,,,5 AL-P13 d ))) ,_ - EVR-P4 EVR-P29 AL-P6 WVR P320 EVR-P151 EVR-P28 AL-P5 WVR P32, Source,City of Apple Valley +J A u EVR-+.80 « c WV-P '` AL-P9 -Pia -P39. i WVRP23 WVR-P26.1 -EVR-P392 D ♦` - WVR-P231 {y f` EVR-P9 EVR-P39.4„.....t ./ EVR-P2'f, ✓' rri'� �t i i,�j AL%P11 7 rs'a25.z wvR-P289 4 � RP15 -„fit EVR-P36 EVR-P24 EVR-P26 � `7 I 1 WVR-P24 X14' AL-'''J"P9.4 � EVR4- AL-P9.5 ,1 WVR-P40 WVR P26 z P5 ,.t + O } ) EVR-P37 r WVR-Fl95R-P552 'J EVR-P48.5 VR-P554 EVp-P�39 VR1P400 WVR-PS�V3 _ WVR-P41 WOO-Pal ♦u " FOR-P48.1 p�7� -�- ..."i8T WVR-P28 4yVR-P55 EVR P39.1 1 inch=3,000 feet `�t +11ft �J EVR-P48.2 ,,,VVV WVR-P2E 1 w EVR-P40 /1 WVR-P28.2 EVR-P38 `, WVR-P28.3 ''''µ EVR-P48.4 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 WVR-P42 WVR-P284I. rl. EVR-P48.3 EVR-P48 1 Feet KL-Pi WVR-P45WVR-P45.4' * " WV ISR5P215.3 EV':e+.41.1 4,,... - WVR-PS EVR-P41 E � ^ KL-P4 WWVVrz n4pW'V3R P4a0.1 2 WVR-PS EVR-P42 "� KL P2 WVR1'QQo•Z WVR-P440 ••• F. WVR-P4411 WVR-P4410 �••• =1.5 WVR-P45.1 WVR-P461 EVR'43� •••• EVR P441 1 ;�� y, _ WVR-P45 i' -Alt ✓ a.- WVR.P4334 ` I5 �V • _ WVR-P4336 R-P 4 } ,yr r1111 I� - y 0 WVR P46 WV R {�43354333 �I EVR-'' 2 N' t Apple EVR Paa I. \/ 1 j ' W,V�VffP48 max-�,g&2da421 WVR-P442 IEVRP941EVR-P44.1 R-P44.4 Valle ct, WVR-PW.4d-P6431 EVR-P4Y 1j .. WVR-P4420 WVR P4432 iiii1t _,: WVR-P443 WVR-P4431 r . T �; +TM�� wvft p5o wvR-Paa33 STORM DRAINAGE AREAS _ WVR-P443 1 _ __SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN ( � i Apple Valley,MN CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Water Resources 9-3 AppValley Figure 9.2 of the Surface Water Management Plan I • Storm Manholes Eagan I Storm Catch h Basin /, �� ?--•'-'- "-"-"-"-'- -fir- - I `. Lift Station !4:,.0 a1 v I a n r n s I I e %t • �.D r _J Flow Direction Arrow ` + Existing Forcemain / r1 Nr VY tl; i -„ }i141 .u, e �J - wq, -; , -'"" /�/ Existing Storm Sewer / - I q 7ry , i - it o ° :, Storm Basins as e 4 j[ / G v r q4� 2,a^ � ° o -i q r I �. I Municipal Boundary .. o kt-� o 7° -- l.o 'l- r �, moo., c , Ltd s°',,, 'f y r0 --4- o o ° 1 Major Subwatersheds :z-r °M_ o '�'4 0., -o ff' ' ' �,.R� b °-� ' -. 9�fde 7 - S R d p a. 7 ,. Alimagnet Lake o'T sf - s e ° �a oo� J _ 1� a-,u 8 �' 4 ' \ Black Dog 3 w 9 P» , • °,, f \ East Vermillion River „s 10: _ .. 4 wY Y £r t. Keller Lake �;` .-rt.. i d . town� y � � � r - �� �,�-ti..— y,,� � � ° �`'�r� � g - ,;,' o Lac Lavon owe, y iSg - L 101 td • 'jam^- i Z -,�. ;,am West Vermillion River ., 44.44 '?� `'-.��111P las�s.fit,-i . ,„ p.;- t:_a � ., "`- Der 4 �+'t► � . Source:City of Apple Valley i rr.40 ly ~ ,fp �s p nyi fI .rIe ° � far a . � •'kF,,��� � �■�' '��s tr - ■ pei r °(;I�,:,,i... 'P„F■"`,S"*F aEi iliplillp4ZA A * p I n V .7 f - - .2- ---' ti i f lam. • q ` •k 1y . ''fie\ .n i•x _ r t� r .f M - r =" �' n unm r r \_ - •'���..�u�nsniikJ s�'J'a umrp� !.fi fit, �. F � � � L _rI ��,. nnu C g 'w,4 rrr! .1-' :79'-'1' Pik r i _ . O nu �r� I SEIi'3'� I.PI. 'y� S� �"'f! _,1 �-J -'_„ „� i'��R40 1 inch=3,000 feet �eS' ti ,-,la it r��'+ �, ; g eie: . o 000 2,000 3,000 ■ 10�J ...�. ' lM;��y�+;'�L Jy�.Nrl+e'i��1�� -,�J _.�i:�'odun � -�. f,'�d►� .�'a._:.� 'J �..�` r '' Feet e �� ,r,,,,,,p. : �iyl4 qtereirri.171::::::...::::: ti 1� w< '1 l'a. • 1:016:11Mnat...filf,..‘141#4-2 7. .".. ' ( :It. i IIV4.......w4AV,14,4 j,..:.„,,,,...„....i.. , _ ..,...• ...... . • , . • ...-----.1-...--,,Ak,_. ±!'ri' 'nt..t4,,I, ;Ift-,',."7:07:#-: , a' •4010, ivento,Yt.:04aki a F le ■S� , 5r ."=`� a n-.J k.yA� •+emu k.� 6 . ••• 1 !IIIIIf li iC jiy. ' •� Apple?' .1YE �i� �_ j Valley n �mxm y ',-,I ... J,f ,writ �r'""a-iyi r STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM I' � „ j >v --N - _.40�l•-F j-••-• 4ql!,kki,�µ M-;kxF a _. - ,--ee-. • _ .� ....•.-, .. _ k�. �N-�-� I J-E', -'an -..-_.-. SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN , Apple Valley,MN CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Water Resources 9-4 Apple„ Issues and Opportunities and hydraulic modeling included in the SWMP ally, include: identified areas where the City will focus its • Cooperation with watershed management or- Section 3 of the SWMP summarizes City-wide and flood risk reduction efforts. ganizations (and/or state agencies) specific water resource issues. The issues dis- . Wetland management (including wetland •cussed in Section 3 of the SWMP are organized Partnerships with neighboring cities g and shoreland buffers, aquatic invasive im- intospe- the following topic areas: cies, and wetland classification and inventory) • Coordination of stormwater management• Water quality (including stormwater runoff — Diverse wetland systems are critical compo- nents of a healthy hydrologic system. Tools to • Implementation of low impact development maximum daily load studies, waterbody clas- inventory, assess, and regulate wetlands are (LID) practices sification and water quality goals,water quality needed to minimize the negative effects of land • Coordination of stormwater management im- BMP maintenance, and other water quality is- development and other human activities in provements with other City programs (e.g., sues) — Much of the City's storm drainage wetlands. pavement management, park improvements) planning efforts were made during a time • Groundwater management — Consumptive when flood protection was a top priority and use of groundwater places increased pressure Goals and Policies the impacts of stormwater runoff on water on the bedrock aquifers that the City re- lies The City developed a number of goals and policies quality were not fully recognized. Much of the upon for drinking water. In addition, develop- to proactively manage stormwater and surface wa- existing water quality degradation is directly ment results in larger impervious areas and ter resources within the City.The goals and policies related to a largely irreversible stormwater more compacted soils, decreasing opportuni- are designed to continue to improve the quality and system configuration that routes runoff from ties for infiltration and recharge. effectiveness of water resource planning and man- urbanized areas through the City's natural wa • Erosion and sediment control — Increased ter resources. Some of the most challenging agement in the City.These goals and policies have sedimentation resulting from urban develop- been developed to complement county, regional, issues facing the City include the manage- ment may negatively impact water quality,fish ment of stormwater quality and the water qual- and state goals, policies and management activi- and wildlife habitat, and aesthetics. Sediment ties while minimizingredundancy. ity of downstream water resources. deposition can also wholly or partially block • Water quantity and flood risk reduction (in- culverts, manholes, and other stormwater fa- The City established the following goals related to cluding floodplain management, hydrologic cilities, increasing flood risk and requiring stormwater and surface water management: and hydraulic modeling, and discussion of se- more frequent maintenance of the City's 1. Manage the risk of flooding to minimize ad- lect local flooding issues) — Many of the most stormwater system. verse effects to life, property, and infrastruc- significant historical flooding issues have been The issues listed above are described in greater ture. addressed by the City.However,development, redevelopment, and changing precipitation detail in Section 3 of the SWMP. Section 3 of the 2 Manage surface water resources to promote patterns place increasing stress on aging SWMP also describes opportunities for the City to healthy ecosystems, preserve water quality, stormwater infrastructure. The hydrologic address these issues.These opportunities,gener- and meet applicable water quality standards. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Water Resources 9-5 APR Valley 3. Manage stormwater runoff to reduce negative of the City's surface water and stormwater imple- niques, system design and engineering methods, impacts to water resources and infrastructure. mentation program (described in greater detail in and other such provisions appropriate to meet the Section 6 of the SWMP), including: requirements of the NDPES permit. The SWPPP 4. Protect, restore, and enhance wetlands and includes BMPs that address each of the six mini- natural areas. • NPDES and TMDL requirements mum control measures as outlined in the rules: • 5. Protect the quality and quantity of groundwa- stormwater system operation and mainte- nance 1. Public education and outreach ter. • Education and public involvement 2. Public participation/involvement 6. Protect water and natural resources through responsible management of development and • Ordinances and official controls 3. Illicit discharge detection and elimination redevelopment activities. • Lake management program 4. Construction site stormwater runoff control 7. Promote stewardship of water and environ- • Projects and capital improvements 5. Post-construction stormwater management mental resources through education, public in- NPDES and TMDL Requirements 6. Pollution prevention /good housekeeping volvement, and Cooperation. The policies intended to support these goals are Under the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's As required by the SWPPP, each year the City (EPA) Storm Water National Pollutant Discharge must hold a public opportunity to provide input on included in their entirety in Section 5 of the SWMP. the adequacy of the MS4 program and the City's Elimination System (NPDES) Rules, the City of q y p g y' a / _ %., % i Apple Valleyis required to maintain a Municipal SWPPP.The City must also prepare an annual re- ' ` I ik, Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit for port summarizing the following: i _ / , - managing point source storm water. In Minnesota, • Compliance with permit conditions, including 1 . .. . �1s : this permit is administered by the Minnesota Pol- an assessment of the appropriateness of iden- jfil _ "'` 4 r ., • lution Control Agency (MPCA) and has a duration tified management practices and progress to ' of five years.The City last renewed its MS4 permit wards achieving identified measurable goals 4: Y / ;"if _Lilt in 2013. As part of the permit, the City must also for the six minimum control measures. prepare and maintain a Storm Water Pollution Pre- • Changes in identified management practices Implementation Program vention Program (SWPPP)addressing all require- or measurable goals for any of the control The purpose of the SWMP is to provide a frame- workments of the permit. measures. and reference for protecting, preserving, and The SWPPP outlines the appropriate best man- The City's SWPPP also includes BMPs to address managing the City surface water resources and agement practices (BMPs) for the City to imple- waterbodies included on the MPCA's impaired wa- stormwater management system. An effective im- ment for controlling or reducing the pollutants in ters 303(d) list for which a total maximum daily plementation program is critical to ensure that the stormwater runoff to the maximum extent practica- load (TMDL) study has been completed. Section direction provided in the SWMP yields results. ble. These BMPs are a combination of education, 303(d) of the Clean Water Act requires states to operation and maintenance, control tech- adopt water quality standards and identify waters The following sections summarize key elements p CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Water Resources 9-6 APPValley that do not meet these standards. In Minnesota, Stormwater System Operation and Mainte- Education and Public Involvement these responsibilities are administered by the nance Education and public involvement serve an im- MPCA. Waters that fail to meet state water quality The City of Apple Valley is responsible for main- portant role in enabling the City of Apple Valley to standards are included on the MPCA's impaired taining its stormwater system. Proper mainte- implement its water resource management pro- waters 303(d) list. The MPCA prepares TMDL nance will ensure that the stormwater system con- grams. The City's education and public involve- studies to address impaired waters. A TMDL is an tinues to function as designed and provides the in- ment program is closely tied to implementation of assessment of the amount of a pollutant that a wa- tended benefits. The City's operation and mainte- its NPDES MS4 permit; several of the City's edu- terbody can receive and still meet water quality nance program is closely tied with the City's imple- cation measures are included in the City's SWPPP standards. TMDL studies may result in implemen- mentation of its NPDES MS4 permit and many of Generally,the goal of the City's education program tation plans to address water quality issues of the the City's maintenance activities are included in the is to promote stewardship of water and natural re- affected waterbodies. City's SWPPP. sources through education, public involvement, The draft 2018 impaired waters list includes four The City's stormwater system includes not only and cooperation.To achieve this goal,the City per- lakes in Apple Valley: pipes and constructed ponds, but also lakes, wet- forms various education and communication activ- • Alimagnet Lake lands, and other drainage ways. In addition to ities. These activities are tailored to a range of tar- • Farquar Lake more typical maintenance measures, mainte- get audiences. • Keller Lake nance of the stormwater system may also mean The following target audiences for the education maintaining or restoring the ecological character- program are: • Long Lake istics of the natural portions of the stormwater sys- • East Lake (in City of Lakeville, but roughly tern.The City regularly inspects and maintains key City Staff. City staff must have adequate under- one-third of our drainage area) components of the system, including storm sewer standing of water resource issues and the City's and culvert inlets, overflow drainage swales, SWMP content to effectively carry out the City's TMDL studies have been completed for all of the 9 stormwater pondingand water qualitytreatment stormwater and surface water management re- impaired lakes listed above. Typically, the City will basins, and ri ra rotected banks, and storm sponsibilities. It is essential for the success of the take the lead to complete and implement TMDLs p p-p for waters impaired due to excess nutrients where sewer and culvert outlets. The City of Apple Valley program that City staff set a good example to the periodically inspects stormwater storage basins community's residents, businesses, and custom- the watersheds are located wholly within the city. p Y p 9 and water qualitytreatment facilities to identifyex- ers by demonstrating behaviors that promote wa- For impaired waters located in the city with inter- cessive sediment build-up, collected debris, and tershed stewardship. community watersheds, the City may request the appropriate watershed management authority undesirable vegetation. The City will use inspec- City Residents. People who live and do business lead or co-facilitate the completion and implemen- tion data and available modeling results to priori- within the city are affected by the City's water re- tation of the TMDL study. For TMDL studies that tize pond maintenance needs. source management programs. Much of the City have regional implications the City will cooperate is privately owned and maintained. It is import-ant with lead agencies as appropriate. to educate and involve residents and business CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Water Resources 9-7 APPValley owners to maintain the political and economic sup- • Minimum building elevations (relative to adja- which is based on an assessment of functions and port necessary to implement the SWMP. Com— municating the City's roles and responsibilities • Wetland impacts and vegetated buffers Because all wetlands provide some functional val- with respect to these issues is important to man- The City requires various permits and/or approvals ues, all are protected to some degree under provi- age residents'expectations, discourage behaviors for land-disturbing projects (including develop- sions in the SWMP. with negative consequences, and develop com- ments), depending on the type of project. The City Regulation of activities that may impact individual munity capacity for practices that positively impact reviews each proposed activity for consistency wetlands will be based on evaluations of proposed water resources. with its official controls prior to issuing permits activities, site-specific wetland boundary delinea- The Development Community. Development and/or approvals. Consistent with the intent of its tions, and wetland management classifications. and redevelopment activities may have a substan- official controls, the City encourages infiltration as tial impact on runoff quality and downstream water a preferred method of water quality treatment and f - ._ bodies during and after construction. Communi- volume control, where feasible, either in on-site - ;� y` _ cating City requirements for land-disturbing activi- features or in regional features. These measures _ ___ `' ties to developers and their consulting engineers will enhance groundwater recharge, decrease the _ _=rr== is an important component of the education pro- burden on the storm drainage system, and mini- _-___ — —_ - !' , gram. mize the pollutant loads reaching high priority --- �_ _4 _P r downstream waterbodies. The City also encour- - - Ordinances and Official Controls - - �_ _- _e `� ages the use of low impact design (LID) tech- - 1 The City of Apple Valley regulates the manage- niques to minimize negative effects of develop- ___ ment of stormwater and protects water resources ment and redevelopment on stormwater infra- • through the policies included in its SWMP, City or- structure and natural resources. Priority Lake Management dinances,the City's project review and permit-ting The City of Apple Valley acts as the Local Govern- The 2018 SWMP identifies six priority lakes. The program, and other applicable regulatory pro- mental Unit (LGU) responsible for administering City identified priority lakes considering intended grams. These are collectively referred to as "offi- the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA). This in- recreational uses, existing MPCA impairments, cial controls." cludes requiring and verifying that all projects im- applicability of MPCA water quality standards, and The City's SWMP and ordinances include require- pacting wetlands meet the requirements of the coordination with other city and/or WMO classifi- ments for development and redevelopment activi- Minnesota WCA and applicable City wetland man- cation systems. City of Apple Valley prioritywater- ties that address the following: agement guidance. bodies include • Stormwater runoff water quality Standards for protection and enhancement of wet- • Alimagnet Lake • Stormwater runoff rate and volume control land resources included in the SWMP are priori- Cobblestone Lake tized according to their wetland classification, Farquar Lake • Erosion and sediment control q CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Water Resources 9-8 AppI/alley • Keller Lake been completed to address a known problem and its Pavement Management Program, redevelop- • Lac Lavon a preferred option is already identified. Other situ- ment opportunities, or other coordinated projects ations may require conducting a feasibility assess- (e.g., park improvements, other utility upgrades). • Long Lake ment to evaluate options to address a known prob- The City may also re-prioritize projects based on The City adopted water quality goals for each lake lem and select a preferred alternative. Finally, a the availability of grant funding, cost-share oppor- consistent with state and WMO standards. The broader pro-active assessment and prioritization of tunities, or availability of other funding sources that SWMP implementation program includes actions problem areas (e.g., city-wide modeling) may be may reduce the City's financial responsibility. to maintain or improve water quality in priority called for to determine the extent of the issue and lakes. assess solutions. In this case, projects may then Sanitary Sewer The City recognizes lakes as complex systems be prioritized depending on their degree of risk or The Metropolitan Council of Environmental Ser- whose responses to numerous natural and other severity. vices (MCES) requires that the City submit a San- variables are difficult to predict.Therefore, the City With respect to water quality, the City will imple- itary Sewer Plan as part of the 2040 comprehen- uses an adaptive management approach.The City ment those projects necessary to address TMDLs sive plan update. The comprehensive plan is up- may modify its planned future actions as neces- developed for impaired waters and achieve water dated every ten years. The wastewater plan is sary based on the results of prior actions, new quality goals for priority lakes,where most feasible reviewed to ensure conformance with the 2040 data, or other factors. and to the maximum extent practicable. This will Water Resources Policy Plan and Thrive MSP include improvements that have already been 2040 to ensure that the Metropolitan Council's re- Projects and Capital Improvements wastewater system has adequate capacity through completed TMDL studies, City gionalY The City performs projects and capital improve- lake management plans, or other planning efforts. to serve the future needs of the region in the right ments to achieve the water resource management Additionally, the City will develop lake manage- locations at the right times. Conformance for goals outlined in its SWMP. These include non- ment plans and implementation programs for re- wastewater means that, within the Metropolitan structural projects(e.g., developing a water quality maining priority lakes Urban ServiceArea, communities are meeting the model, performing feasibility studies) as well as overall density expectations identified in Thrive The City will continue to rely on its 5-year Capital MSP 2040. structural improvements (e.g., constructing an in- Improvement Planning process to schedule and filtration basin). These activities are summarized plan for funding of capital improvements. This CIP Apple Valley has prepared this section of the Corn- in implementation tables included in the SWMP. is updated annually by City staff and reviewed and prehensive Plan to demonstrate its conformance The City generally performs projects and/or capital approved annually by the City Council. to the regional plan. This section of the Utilities improvement projects to maintain the function of chapter summarizes Apple Valley's Comprehen- The City carries out its implementation program its stormwater system, reduce flood risk, and/ or with the intent to achieve the City's goals while sive Sanitary Sewer Plan, on file with the City that improve water quality. In some cases, a technical provides the specific information needed to meet promoting efficiency and minimizing cost. There- assessment(or feasibility study) has already the 2040 requirements. The Comprehensive San- fore, the City will seek opportunities to coordinate stormwater system repair and/or replacement with itary Sewer Plan serves as an inventory of the CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Water Resources 9-9 APR Valley City's sanitary trunk facilities and a guide for corn- Burnsville and Eagan Outlets (2 in each district) acres are served by the MCES Empire wastewater pleting the few remaining trunk sections. which all flow to the north into Burnsville and Ea- treatment plant (WWTP) located near Pilot Knob gan respectively. There are no trunk sewers in the Road, 197th Street East, and the Vermillion River; Eagan Outlet. This area is only served by sewer in Section 21 of Empire Township. Conveyance to Existing Sanitary Sewer System laterals and encompass a regional park, zoo, and the Empire WWTP is provided by the MCES Inter- General small residential area. Copies of intercommunity ceptor mains beginning at meters M643, M648, service agreements are on file with the City.Areas and M644. A review of the City's existing sanitary sewer col- covered by these agreements include Districts El, lection system will provide insight into its ability to E2, and B1 shown in Figure 9.1. Wastewater from approximately 1,800 acres in the convey domestic, commercial and industrial northern portion of Apple Valley is served by the wastewater to the wastewater treatment facility. Wastewater flow leaves Apple Valley at seven dif- MCES Seneca WWTP located near Comanche The existing trunk sewer system is mostly corn- ferent locations at or near the City borders. A list Road and State Highway 13 in Section 21 in Ea- plete with the exception of approximately 500 of these locations and their average flows is pre- gan. Conveyance to the Seneca plant is provided acres within the southeastern part of the City.This sented in Table 9.1 These flows all lead from Ap- by the MCES Interceptor main from meter M644A area will be developed as the current sand and ple Valley through other municipalities to either the and trunk sewers in the City of Eagan and Burns- gravel mining operations cease. The existing col- Empire or Seneca WWTPs. ville. lection system was evaluated for its ability to serve There are approximately 11,181 acres in the City this area as well as remaining undeveloped par- of Apple Valley, of which approximately 487 acres cell. remain to be developed. Of the overall total, 9,400 Trunk Sewer System, MCES Intercep- Table 9.1 IntercommunIty Flows tors and Intercommunity Connections Average Estimated District From To The City's trunk sanitary sewer system is shown Flow(MGD) on Figure 9.1.The trunk system consists of gravity Southwest(SW) SW,SW1,SW2,SW3,SW4 MCES M643 1.47 lines ten inches in diameter and greater, lift sta- South Central(SC) SC MCES M648 0.87 Southeast(SE) SE,SE1,SE2,SE3,SE4 MCES M644 1.06 tions and forcemains. The City is divided into five Burnsville Outlet 61 MCES M644A 0.15 sewer districts, each defining the limits of service Burnsville Outlet B2 Burnsville 0.02 for a separate trunk system. Eagan Outlet El Eagan 0.02 The Southwest, South Central and Southeast Dis- Eagan Outlet E2 Eagan 0.10 tricts are the largest districts and flow leaves Apple Valley to the south through MCES interceptor lines into Lakeville. The remaining two Districts are the CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Water Resources 9-10 APPValley Figure 9.3,Sanitary Sewer System 11.11 /1M111.11 • • �arrm .role,_.k• t. •nw..=..mmm�-�._.r..ra! .......................... •—• �.—r— ©Lift Stations (SW)Southwest D strict .. �. .r. •1 (swt)Southwest oiso-kc-Ls at • ,' � I • '•-., Forcemain (swz(Southwest District•LS rs • /• L€1 V (sws)southwest District•Ls.tt • t 1 xcumrin rwas - 4-inch (3w4)Southwest District•LS r2 I—-- —i / I SE4 J -- {Finch. (scl scum Central District • / -- r— 1/ E2 ; C "��oo I —8-inch (SE]SGWh20E[blSblct • l' _� r Gnoo,os 1� uss (6E1)Farquar Lake Dlatrkt-L6 ill • M644A .� 1 — inch-inch (SEE)Fsrquur Luke District-LS 49 • • • ry^I t ,^� I --•--•`— 1�2sTH srw� f (SES)Farquar Lake District-LS SIS 4. rJ �� L --- Gravity inch (6E4)Valleywoad it'./h r L 3 I ` ...k > I Gravity Trunk Sewer (el)Burnsville Outlet-L6 43 „LS/ • LS#3 4{ c� LS#2 .�" • r- . 9-inc1. (B2)BurnsveeOutlet•Burnsville Ls 00, '`- — x r �— LS#10 — . 10-inch (Cl)Eason outlet-West �!'' ��❑'' 7- (E2)Eagan Datlet-East B1'-.- ; r,SW4 -V\ I I — inch-inch I J SE3 . t 15-inch .< '.L-----� �, .J . 18-inch �+ '� -- J i•, _ _ • . .21-inch LS#7t' y, L_,' I.-. rl r-"`\ - •� I -I � L I - inch-inch , _.. _ I SE1 J1_,c LS#9 27-inch Ii32 MOA�REWSr I I r �30-inch 'SETH ST E B Bur ns vil LI- f�:r • o LS#1 �,l —33-inch I a ..©� I all ,b Diversion Valve r �� rY I •--•MCES Interceptor Sewer r / 'L , I SE2 0� —Gravity Sewer • a d MCES Meter/Connection il\SW1 ` � t /// — �� OE Eagan Connection LS fk1 L. 146THSTW rl ._ _ �'�` -F J I � Connection • ; � ' r� .mot I 1 ���. � .1 Future Trunk J ^ i I i L/! / 1 ��k,4 ' j Sewer ���� • $W - L_ 4 Jt 1 o Y . >` � Sanitary ► ►10-inch �y J l I GG .r ; .—.12-inch I At • J♦Y I 1 �I ' ' y I Sewer v ` ` ` System • ►15-inch —f r) a _E— �'1 I r ' .-••►18-inch �� ► ►21-inch \ r` I I r _ r —� ,, Existing . .24-inch i \3 ` I ` y Y SC i ' /� V.. .-•-►30-inch . f I 1! T� and t,5pi}toS,T,w is TM STw .---►42-inch I 4L- -----_. E' ' +►+` I Future 1 ,....#.......... I ` I System ra w /! \\\:: I { y w ( i I ;"� I Trunk »..... Ls#5 W2 I R r \ IL\ 1 ''•,� I a I I System I r .4h 7 1. f I � ' - Sewer i_ A'�ll -. -- : '- : • % 1. - si,A __,... i i '�'' I Size LS#11"� lr° — 41 I V ' M643 l•�1��y`� 1s9TM 5TW r m `Ii` +I lI I M648 M644 Sta YY J —.—.—.—.—. .—. .r�rrrrrrtrrrtrnrrrr M rrrrr.rrtt1rrrrrr.w•• ••••••• • M •-• `�'J--� fTi J t J CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Water Resources 9-11 Apple Lift Stations Large Sewer Users Forecasts The City's sanitary sewer system consists of nine At the present time, there are no major industries The comprehensive wastewater plan is developed (9)lift stations ranging in size from a 100 gallon per in Apple Valley whose average daily sewage flow in part to portray the condition of the Apple Valley minute(gpm)to a 2200 gpm lift station.The lift sta- exceeds 50,000 gallons.At this time, no industries wastewater collection system under future flow tions have been sized to handle buildout of their in the City require pretreatment of their wastewa- conditions assuming that the population and em- respective service areas. Table 9.2 summarizes ter before discharge into the City's system. ployment forecasts are achieved. The purpose in the capacity information for each of the lift stations. Existing Wastewater Flows developing the future plan is to anticipate future The locations of the lift stations are shown on Fig- changes to the system that may be required and ure 9.1. The total flows are measured by MCES at four (4) to allow for the development of a sustainable cap- meter locations leaving the City. Annual, monthly, ital improvements program for the wastewater col- Table 9.2 Lift Station Capacities and hourly flow data is available for the MCES me- lection system. The Thrive MSP 2040 population, Lift Present Ultimate Force Ca- ters. Peak month and peak hourly flow data help household and employment forecasts (Table 9.3) Main pacity deter- mine infiltration and inflow contributions. Station Capacity Capacity in 10-year increments through 2040 were used in No. (MGD) (MGD) Size in The 10-year average annual per capita wastewa- generating wastewater flow projections and in (inches) GPM ter flow is approximately 66 gallons per day(GPD) maintaining the required consistency with all parts LS 1 3.16 3.16 14 2200 and the average dry weather (winter) per capita of the comprehensive planning effort. LS 2 2.016 2.016 12 1400 wastewater flow is approximately 66 GPD. Water use data is available by customer type and can be Table 9.3 Metropolitan Council Protections LS 3 0.936 0.936 8 650 used to estimate the breakdown of wastewater Forecast 4 0.288 0.288 6 200 flow between residential and other land uses. Wa- LSYear Population Households Employment ter use data indicates that winter residential water 2010 49,084 18,875 14,279 2020 55,500 21,700 15,800 LS 5 0.6 0.6 6 and 8 410 use averaged 85% of the total water use over the 2030 59,200 23,300 16,400 last 10 years;thus the residential portion of the av- LS 7 0.288 0.288 6 200 2040 63,600 24,900 17,100 erage per capita wastewater flow is approximately LS 9 1.915 1.915 12 1330 56 GPD(85%of 66).When comparing 10-year av- Table 9.4 presents the projections broken down erage dry weather flows to the same winter quarter according to sewered and unsewered compo- LS 10 0.216 0.216 4 150 water usage,the wastewater flow is approximately nents. 97% of the water use. The metered dry weather LS 11 0.144 0.144 4 100 wastewater flow correlates quite well with the me- tered water use for the same time period, which indicates some validity to the existing flow data. Population and Employment CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Water Resources 9-12 AppValley Table 9.4 Metropolitan Council Projections Table 9.5 Projections for Empire WWTP To forecast future flow from existing areas histori- (Sewered&Unsewered) Year Population Households Employment cal flow data, industry standards and current Forecast Popula- House- Employ- 2020 50,500 19,700 14,400 MCES data were used. MCES has indicated that Component regional data suggests tion holds ment 2025* 52,500 20,550 14,650 9 the current overall aver- MCES 2030 54,500 21,400 14,900 age annual flow is 85 gallons per capita per day 2010 Sewered 46,686 17,928 13,714 2035* 56,550 22,150 15,150 (gpcd). This is lower than the traditional default for 2010 Unsewered 2,398 947 565 2040 58,600 22,900 15,400 sewer design of 100 gpcd. MCES Ref: Metropolitan Council Thrive 2040 Water Resources Furthermore, MCES has prepared future average 2020 Sewered 54,980 21,500 15,680 Policy Plan May 2015 flow projections for their system based upon 60 2020 Unsewered 520 200 120 * Interpolated Values gpcd and 15 gallons per day (gpd) per employee. MCES These figures are for new development and antic- 2030 Sewered 59,170 23,280 16,400 Table 9.6 Projections for Sceneca WWTP Year Population Households Employment ipate the gradual reduction of wastewater flow 2030 Unsewered 30 20 0 from existing development as a result of water MCES 2020 4,500 1,800 1,300 Sewered 2025* 4,600 1,850 1,400 conservation practices and the reduction of inflow 2040 63,520 24,880 17,100 and infiltration. It is important to note that these 2040 Unsewered 80 20 0 2030 4,700 1,900 1,500 2035* 4,800 1,950 1,600 flow rates will vary as systems expand and age, so Ref: Metropolitan Council Thrive 2040 Water it is prudent to use traditional design values when Resources Policy Plan May 2015 2040 4,900 2,000 1,700 Ref: Metropolitan Council Thrive 2040 Water Resources looking at the design of new lateral sewer or trunk Tables 9.5 and 9.6 present projections of sewered Policy Plan May 2015 systems. population, households and employees for the * Interpolated Values portions of the City served by the Empire and Sen- Land Use eca WWTPs, respectively, as prepared by MCES Sanitary Sewer Flow The 2040 Land Use Plan served as the basis for and presented in its Thrive 2040 Water Resources Projections the development of the sanitary sewer flow projec- Policy Plan. tions and analysis of the trunk system. Undevel- General oped land area within the City was determined to In an effort to forecast flows for future growth, the be approximately 500 acres. These areas were land use plan will be utilized. Flow rates will be es- further defined by type of land use. Land use flow tablished for each land use category based upon factors were used to allocate projected flows with- the anticipated density in units and persons per in the sewer model and are presented in Table 9.7. acre which can be applied to specific undeveloped parcels or redevelopment areas. These unit flow rates can be used to generate average annual flow projections for these specific development areas. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY I 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Water Resources 9-13 App1/alley Table 9.7 Land Use Flow Factors curves. A summary of the design peak flow fac- Gal/ tors (Figure 9.4 below) based upon current F5gure9SIHCESMetershed Goal Peaking Factors MCES data will be utilized for estimatin future TableA-2:Wastewater Flow Variation Factors for Determining Infll- Person/ Cap/ Units/ Gal/Acre/ g trationl Inflow Mitigation Goals Land Use Type Unit Day Acre Day peak flows from development areas. Low Density Figure 9.4 Design Peaking Factor Table Average Flow Peak Hourly Average Flow Peak Hourly Residential 3.5 100 1.8 630 (MGD) Flow Factor (MGD) Flow Factor Table Al:MCES Flow Variation Factors for Sewer Design <0.10 4.5 2.51 3.00 3.2 Medium Densi- 0.11-0.20 4.4 3.01 3.50 3.1 ty Residential 2.5 80 9 1,800 0.21-0.30 4.3 3.51 dA0 3.0 Average Flow Peak Hourly Average Flow Peak Hourly 0.31-0.40 4.2 4.01-4.50 2.9 High Density (MGD} Flow Factor (MGD) Flow Factor 0.41-0.50 4.1 4.51 3.03 2.8 0.00-0.11 4.0 1.90-2.29 2.8 0.51-0.60 5.01-6.00 Residential 2.0 70 14 1,960 0.12-0.18 3.9 2.30-2.89 2.7 0.61-0.70 4.0 6.01-.0) 2.7 Commercial/ 0.19-fl.23 3.8 2.90-3.49 2.6 0.71-0.sa 801-10.a0 024-fl.29 3.7 3.50-4.19 2.5 3.9 2.6 0.81-1.00 10.01-12.00 Industrial 2,000 0.30-0.39 3.6 4.20-5.09 2.4 3.8 2.5 00-16. 0.40-0.49 3.5 5.10-6.39 2.3 1.01-1.20 3.7 12.012.4 Mixed Busi- 0.50-0.64 3.4 6.40-7.99 2.2 121-1.50 3.6 16.01-20A) 2.3 Hess Campus 1,500 0.65-0.79 3.3 8.00-10.39 2.1 1.51-2.00 3 5 20.01 30.00 2.2 0.80-0.99 3.2 10.40-13.49 2.0 2.01-2.50 3.4 '3000 2.1 1.00-1.19 3.1 13.50-17.99 1.9 Institutional 1,000 3.3 2.0 1.20-1.49 3.0 18.00-29.99 1.8 Parks/ Recreation Wastewater Flow Projections 250 1.E0-1.95 2 9 g�,�„r30.00 1 7 Undevelopable When forecasting flows for communities that are MCES has recognized that these peaking factors (Water/Pond) 0 mostly developed, historical data is used to de- reflect that sanitary sewers (local and regional) termine total flow projections for the community. Peak Flow Factors have been designed for an average combined The 10-year annual average per capita flow rate The sanitary sewer system must be capable of flow for residential, commercial, and industrial from Apple Valley is approximately 66 gallons per handling the anticipated peak wastewater flow contributions of 100 gallons per capita per day. day (gpd), which is slightly lower than the current rate including any infiltration and inflow WI). The Since the current actual average is approxi- over- all MCES system average of 85 gpd. This design peak flow rate can be expressed as a var- mately 85 gallons per capita per day MCES has may be an indication of the general trend in water iable ratio to the average flow rate. Curves used adjusted the peak flow factors upward (divided by conservation similar to what the City has seen to describe this ratio,called the Peak Flow Factor 0.85) for determining Ill mitigation. This adjust- with the water system. It could also be an indica- (PFF), indicate a decreasing ratio of peak flow to ment essentially reflects the available capacity tion that the overall average Ill in Apple Valley's average flow with increasing average flow. for any additional infiltration and inflow in the sys- system is slightly below the metro area system tern. These are then used to set the peak flow Peak flow Factor(PFF)curves have been devel- average. While it is expected that water conser- metershed goals for each community. Figure 9.5 oped to depict this ratio and MCES has analyzed vation within existing households will continue to below summarizes the peaking factors for MCES the extensive flow data within their system to cor- improve. The existing sanitary sewer system will metershed goals. relate actual peaking factors with the formulated continue to age thus for planning purposes the CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Water Resources 9-14 APPValley City will use an overall per capita average of 100 Table 9.9 Average Annual Wastewater Flow Pro- Sanitary Sewer Trunk System gpd for future flow projections. This is a slightly Jectlons Analysis more conservative value than historical data, but it Year Projected Total Average Annual is close to the current metershed goals set by Flow (MGD) General MCES for the City as summarized below in Table M643 M644A M644 M648 9.8. It is prudent to plan conservatively for long- In order to gain an understanding of the hydraulic 2020 1.47 0.31 1.13 0.88 lived infrastructure needs such as sewer systems. 2025 1.47 0.31 1.15 0.94 capacity of the existing wastewater collection sys- 2030 1.47 0.31 1.16 1.01 tern, a hydraulic model of the key system back Table 9.8 Current MCES Metershed Goals bone components of the system was developed. 2035 1.48 0.32 1.17 1.07 Monitoring Period:Jan 1- Dec 31,2018 2040 1.48 0.32 1.17 1.15 To setup the hydraulic model, information was col- lected from an extensive database of GIS (Geo- Adjusted To- These projections agree with MCES projections to Information System), field data collection Metershed tal Daily Flow Peak Hourly I/I Goal the Empire and Seneca WWTP. (Table 9.10) Me- graphic Flow Factor (MGD) and staff knowledge about the lift stations, trunk (MGD) tershed M644A flows to Seneca WWTP and the M643 1.47 3.50 5.13 sewer mains and forcemains. Wastewater flow in- other metersheds flow to Empire WWTP. formation was collected from flow monitoringdata M644A 0.15 4.40 0.65 M644 1.06 3.60 3.80 Table 9.10 MCES Projected Flows by Treatment along with individual water meter data from the M648 0.87 3.70 3.22 Facility customer database to allocate wastewater flows Total 3.55 12.80 throughout the community. Future sewer flows Projected Projected *Equates to approximately 67gpcd based upon esti- Avg Flow Avg Flow were determined from information provided by the mated 2018 population of 52,795. to Empire to Seneca Projected Land Use Plan in which demands were determined WWTP WWTP Total Flow by land use categories for undeveloped areas. Annual average wastewater flow projections Year (MGD) (MGD) (MGD) through 2040 are summarized below in Table 2020 3.48 0.31 3.79 9.9. These estimates are based upon an overall 2025* 3.56 0.31 3.87 system average of 85 gallons per capita per day 2030 3.64 0.31 3.95 (gpcd), and assumes that there will be no unsew- 2035* 3.72 0.32 4.04 ered properties remaining in the future. The pro- 2040 3.80 0.32 4.12 jections for Metersheds M643, M644A, and M644 Ref: Metropolitan Council Thrive 2040 Water Re- remain relatively the same as existing since that sources Policy Plan May 2015 area is already fully developed and not anticipated * Interpolated Values to have any changes due to redevelopment. The undeveloped area in the southeastern area of the City is served by Metershed M648. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Water Resources 9-15 p`PPValley System Design Recommendations Capacity analysis was completed for the trunk Available capacity was labeled at key locations sewer system to determine the remaining avail- with large undeveloped areas. Future analysis in- The hydraulic model analysis was performed to able capacity within the existing system. A map cluding the addition of 500 acres of undeveloped determine the available capacity within the exist- showing available capacity is shown in Figure 9.4. land showed adequate capacity to handle the ing system.After determination of available capac- Analysis using the hydraulic model showed that no planned land use for these areas. It is recom- ity, a layout of remaining future gravity sewers was areas within the existing system experience sur- mended to use the updated hydraulic model tore- incorporated into the hydraulic model. The poten- charging. Surcharging is defined as over- loading view future development of these areas as actual tial system was sized based on established sewer of the sewer beyond its design capacity. Although development information becomes available. design criteria including minimum slopes and min- no areas surcharge, a few areas of the trunk sewer imum velocity. GIS information was utilized to de- are within the 10% to 40% range of remaining ca- termine ground elevations and preliminary slopes pacity and should be reviewed with the model if for the extension of sewers considering depth re- and when redevelopment would occur in the fu- quirements and connections to existing sewers. ture. Trunk sewer was laid out in the undeveloped gravel mining area and flows were allocated based on proposed land use. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Water Resources 9-16 p`PPValley Figure 9.6 Sanitary Sewer Trunk System Remaining Capacity • r (SW)Southwest District • r11611.1Me .-, • �r__.ue ..e, _ (SW7(Southwest 0 slot! LS/14 ra .t - v - ■Lift Stations (5W2)Southwest 0ietnct-LS#0 • /• l El V '•F •• Forcemain (SW31 Southwest District-LS#11 ♦ I' / REGIONAL PAW Sewer (SW4)Southwest District-LS 42 � �- --t s I SE4 ,�; Gravity Trunk (SC)south Central District • ` -. V E2 � G• � .s. !- F-�F c Available Capacity (SE)So utheast District • I G.Rr.�Rs � Surcharging (5E1)Farquar Lake District-LS M1 • M644A 1 IL125TH STW L..1—? ' (sE2l Farquar Lake District.LS ps •_ M �^ --J^ ,__ __ ,_ . 0%to 20%Remaining (5E3)Farquar Lake District-LS MO .yeF'� LS#_ r 3 J-- -20%to 40%Remaining (B1) urr1 vwocd gRp� r\a 4 -� I �' 40%to fi0%Remaining (91(e alleyweouaet-Ls us Q- < LS#2 ' (92 Burnsville Outlet Burnsville L5 "� a 'r r� '1 ` L �— I _ 00%to 00%Remaining El)Eagnnouaet-wear 1 " 1 ' `E1,1 Z ---vLS#10' (E2(Eagan Outlet-East ,1 'L +80%to 100%Remainin g �p i3 1 I f y� ` �w� , I y �1 I -Gravity Sewer .� . /fr� J I 41 �" • ( .J Diversion Valve / ,� "'Y L i __ I [ Y �� !� f•MCES Interceptor Sewer L5#7i' I L - T 1 I—I• _- j I f lI ©Eagan Connection !D noEAl* .-. )1/ L.- SE1 `` I'1�� L5#9 0 MCE5 MeterlConnection !B '�f` ��J I , W -� 4 LS#1` F 0 Burnsville Connection 13,3TH ST i= BurnsvilleLS " ••'� '• --� \i >, Lam, I *i•Y� wIL .1J I _ '`,-"-\k„.' " 1 SE2 SW1 \- ''i 6. I 4 ] `-�- "taoTr aTW f �` • - FSF \L.-• L a Tr—f•—f-F—F Y.sF—G• y sw �~ a o � / �a f Sanitary ;� �� Fr ; Sewer > - [ �-� System COGS? � v ¢�� 1 Hw eel,Ywc„ J i Flow.0.12IA. ��I. J_• '1 IQ, I.i <: _ SC F Y l_1 T� i Existing System F j I ' sni sr w r Trunk aa;'aol o yp"m,' I .� i : 1 System 1 I w 1 _-r--J Fmw `,auto �_ available Capaciy Averaoe cav LS#5 2: , 'I' v �� 1 q . J' I 9 ri•.1�• •} rr \,, r1°w-°-aeneu Remaining —J- A I Capacity i_15 AT v<<` ' J I I 'II M643 I I s . r ,, tJ a� 1 =snrH ST w- I 1 rL ' ����----������M646 M6-4 kl,. © • • •��•�•�•�•Arrllllllrll�r�r�1�1�•� I �rm[y�.L._,rt•�._. _ y� V'J�F'...,... ` y�rJ • . CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Water Resources 9-17 AppValley Infiltration and Inflow Included within the MCES 2040 Water Resources Existing I/I Policy, adopted in May of 2015 and more recently General amended, is the establishment of I/I goals for all Average dry weather flows can be compared to deter- communities discharging wastewater to the re- The annual average and peak month flows to Metropolitan Council appointed a task force mine the amount of I/I entering the system. To un- gional system. Communities with excessive I/I will that met in 2003/2004 to address the impacts of derstand if groundwater plays a role during dry still be required to eliminate it within a reasonable excess inflow and infiltration (I/I)on the region- al time period. The Council has established I/I goals weather periods, the average dry weather flows system. I/I describes clear water that enters can be compared to the water use for that same for each metershed. The City of Apple Valley was wastewater collection systems and consumes ca- not on MCES's excessive I/I list and receives an- period. These flows should closely correlate since pacity of the conveyance and treatment systems. no wet weather rainfall events or lawn sprinkling nual I/I goals for each metershed. Inflow is typically stormwater that increases peak occurs in the winter/early spring time. For Apple flow in the wastewater system during and after The I/I Goal is the maximum allowable discharge Valley, the dry weather flow averages about 97% rainfall events from point sources such as broken to the regional wastewater system expressed as a of the water use for the same period. Table 9.11 manhole covers, sewer cleanouts, sump pumps, peak hourly flow rate measured in million gallons summarizes average annual, average dry weather foundation drains, and rain leaders. Infiltration is per day(mgd).The I/I Goal is equal to the adjusted and peak month flows for the last ten years. Italso typically groundwater that gradually enters the average dry weather flow (ADF) multiplied by the compares the various flows to help quantify the wastewater system through cracks and openings respective peak hourly factor. The ADF is based amount of I/1 entering the system on an average in sewer mains, service laterals,joints, and deteri- upon a 10-year rolling average of meter flow data basis. orated manholes. It was determined that the cost and is adjusted upward by population growth for for source removal of I/I was much more cost ef- future forecasting.As part of the ongoing I/1 efforts fective than the cost to store, convey and treat ex- a procedure manual is updated by the Metropoli- cess I/I.Therefore,the current program focuses on tan Council for the subsequent program year. The source removal within the communities and re- City's Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan, on file gional system. with the City, addresses the MCES specific re- quirements. In 2009/2010 the Metropolitan Council Demand Charge Task Force reviewed goals of the current program including a possible demand charge.The recommendation was to implement an on-going program similar to the existing I/I program. How- ever, instead of a mandatory demand charge,dis- cretion was left with MCES to institute a demand charge if a community is not working towards meeting its I/I Goal. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Water Resources 9-18 p`PPValley Table 9.11 Average Annual Wastewater Flow On-going Mitigation Plan Average An- Average Peak Month Average Wet Peak Month The City has a proactive program directed at iden- Year Popula- nual Flow:AA Dry Weath- Flow: PM Base Ill AA- Weather to Annual tion (MGD) er Flow:AD (MGD) AD (MGD) Ill PM-AA Average tifying and correcting I/I, including the following: (MGD) (MGD) Ratio 2007 50,595 3.54 3.52 4.47 0.02 0.93 1.26 • Stringent testing of all new sanitary sewer 2008 51,120 3.40 3.40 4.19 0.00 0.79 1.23 lines 2009 50,149 3.39 3.35 4.10 0.04 0.71 1.21 • Televising of clay pipes as well as areas where 2010 49,084 3.36 3.33 4.84 0.03 1.48 1.44 problems have been identified 2011 50,330 3.38 3.38 4.29 0.00 0.91 1.27 • 2012 50,340 3.29 3.23 4.69 0.06 1.40 1.43 Reconstruction projects, including replacing 2013 50,400 3.32 3.29 4.42 0.03 1.10 1.33 clay pipe with PVC, replacing manhole struc- 2014 50,600 3.28 3.24 4.94 0.04 1.66 1.51 tures, installing gator wrap around chimney 2015 50,161 3.20 3.20 4.15 0.00 0.95 1.30 section 2016 50,450 3.20 3.19 3.76 0.01 0.56 1.18 • Lining manholes, approximately one (1) to Average I/I Flow(MGD) --- 1.05 three (3) annually Average I/I Per Capita (GPCD) 20.8 • Cured In Place Pipe(CIPP)Lining spot repairs Average I/I% --- 31 • Lining entire sections of sanitary sewer lines Comparing annual average (AA) to average dry event could have a large impact on the system or with reconstruct projects and areas as identi- weather (AD), the average flow attributable to I/I minimal impact depending upon the duration and fied is approximately 0.02 mgd or 0.5 gallons per cap- intensity as well as other factors for each particular • Manhole inspection as part of sewer cleaning ita per day,which could be considered the base I/I. event. Typically no two events are the same and, operations, which are performed daily March The average peak month (PM) to annual average at best, patterns can be determined for general through November, weather permitting. Ap- ratio is 1.31. This equates to an average I/I contri- rainfall amounts. To pinpoint peak hour events it proximately one third of the system is cleaned bution of approximately 1.05 mgd during wet requires a significant amount of flow monitoring at (and manholes inspected) annually. Manholes are also inspected as part of the televising pro- weather periods. several locations in a large system. There has gram. Manholes are repaired as needed. In- beenBy looking at flows over the course of a year it is only limited data collected during previous ternal chimney seals are installed on man- possible to quantify I/I on an average basis. How- mitigation efforts, which makes it difficult to accu- holes with plastic rings where I/1 has been ever, it is much more difficult to determine peak rately quantify for the entire system. identified. instantaneous or peak hour events that are mostly • Additional manhole inspections (i.e., Lift Sta- associated with inflow. A one inch (1") rainfall tion 4 Project-proposed project lining of CITY OF APPLE VALLEY I 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Water Resources 9-19 Apple structures because of length of time before re- Individual Sewage Treatment Capital Improvement Program construct of area) Systems y The City of Apple Valley is committed to providing • Manhole repair, including chemical injection The City of Apple Valley currently has an ordinance a sanitary sewer system that meets the City's cur- and coatings Section 51.55-51.65 regulating the installation of rent and future needs and agrees with MCES • Sewer flow meters in 2018 and 2019 budget on-site wastewater disposal systems. Under this goals and projections. Most of the City's trunk sys- - plan is to compare sewer flow data with Ad- ordinance, the design of the system is reviewed tem has been constructed. The trunk system will vanced Meter Infrastructure (AMI) meter data and permitted in accordance with the guidelines of be expanded in the few remaining areas as devel- in select areas Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Standards opment proceeds. Based on the computer model- • Sump pump inspection program —to be con- MN Rule 7080, 7081, 7082 and its amendments. ing analysis,the addition of 500 acres of un-devel- ducted with the meter replacement project A copy of the City's ordinance is provided in the oped land shows adequate capacity in the current • Employee education—NPDES annual training Comprehensive Sewer Plan. The City's ordinance system to handle the planned land use for these • Resident education—website,newsletters covers such specifics as license, permits, site areas. The hydraulic model will be updated on an evaluation report, management plan, compliance on-going bass to review future development of • Field observation — wet weather manhole in- these areas as actual development information spections and additional observations, such inspections, and repair of non-complying or failing p as when conducting a GSOC located adjacent systems. To ensure proper operation, a manage- becomes available. bprivate parking lot street, crew found a sani- ment plan is required for each Subsurface Sewage Future Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) projects tary manhole with a storm grate cover on it. Treatment System (SSTS) and solids removal is will explore and identify ways to improve the san- Crew replaced the manhole grate cover with a not to exceed every three(3)years. itary sewer system, such as during reconstruction solid cover and the business was notified. The locations of present on-site systems are projects for sanitary sewer mains, lift stations, and • City Code that promotes reduced I/I—The cur- shown on Figure 9.5. There are currently 34 resi- forcemains. In addition, the City will continue its rent code prohibits owners, occupants or us- dential SSTS, two (2) commercial SSTS, and four current operation, maintenance, and I/I reduction ers of any premises to direct into or allow any (4)commercial holding tanks. At the present time, efforts as identified previously. storm water,surface water,water from air con- no significant problems are known to exist for the ditioner systems, oil or other material to drain Preventative maintenance is extremely important existing on-site systems. There are no public or into the sanitary sewer system. in the life of a sanitary sewer system. Preventative privately-owned Community Wastewater Treat- maintenance includes but not limited to monthly ment Systems other than the identified individual and annual inspections, SCADA monitoring, and SSTS and holding tanks in operation in the City. electrical inspections. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Water Resources 9-20 APPValley Figure 9.7 Subsurface Sewage Treatment Systems alli. I llgs BURNSVILLEPKWYE Ui ►•� A-1�YRA /: u�x�uMrn�.�u�n�n�u�u�n�u�n .�,l�ywrr�-n_ t in Sanitary rs, . 0r0Ka Sewer ,..,. ..�■�..rt System • c , �57,I, } �' J r• 125TH STW y, A. p■.►►1 ; 1 0 s Ir .� — Subsurface Sewage 7tye���/� �A d ��F�� •v i:11► 4y ' IF �=mr aterw� s p.i a_ ®r o h_ ''oa iND�i qe _ s t �'„S�/;H.: ._roan ,r .e .1 M�s■M �k�_ n ■�_-�� Treatment Systems .I10 t 0 b�Op�N ®,iia J�O ifr �® ,.;41 b �i . � ,� a. C �[ - I.�11 O,, �a �e�/�x .i L7�/��►i �. M N`� @r III L.A 1 �1� 'm s40._�'►<C � �oli..■ �� n 1 n 1. C�`) ���■��� Septic . -- 10:.4 s4_411 yin. ■•0 uI r ',. .,a. - „ -s Y` A - +un 1 p Nnrai vtivr •y■o �� � ►..� DI �� � ��'►� :;;• � r4 0 � .++� _ Systems sr ®®®I3 wrG: ► O/ WI low.e � � � �:1;1,14� _ Inventory IIII-. N -.y , save 0I/ .11 1 ;. 1 1 .1�.1 -1. ' I :oit - MpDREW �q`I����Ih■ > MNa..1.�''.�. Q,3 a► __� ������� � x��,, ••11 IOW a ■ -r �Pq 6r - i. 11/ a�.�N/r r • Residentiale111���.0 a� •H.• HV•.gdry?irkso � / //;a w■/e 138TH STE J� —p•iVr :a s•� ••• _ - • Si QS • \ "Z7;[TT` r wl i i niilll�a U ::11 u ■•v1ofi• • + _ . m.e. W�(\a. a�_. Commercial ■ n , ro 0b I HoldingTank aao E„t�• •• vd r6::11= - a \74, '.,,0+7rr♦ te,..,dN dm■ 4. a .11 n■ P e . � y. • o 4L•r.:oy$i 1•it Al ��� wilri4 oS.y,; ..1r�rN: ,�. �Gya�i�� Tee 3�'I� t�� >N.Ns�: > � W I✓y.'• ♦ �-,�y.•4��•.►ryR►ii i t E • ` i4.4%._ �; .•.'=9\ e���,�,'�'F�° o�i','►`O ...• a�,a��•. as �et i'• `,. .401 "z 1:/�°rj ,a r zap o r�r ti •o» m S�'C+ .!� n 9. �_ Inn, • _t_5 a�.p4G•.�??C n�„ IdJ sia f �p.��., o a s �yI S p +al:...S=:L.:1. ® 40TH ST W ;AA.11:ale Q► 1 6® I r iI n Ala�. M1. 11i111\ Amm•IAi AM „0 .e nn� _ D` s +a o J ..w•..: pv.w/Illllor: t, .�S p - .>=oJ.,1 +p a �..i� �1 a ►�VGl�Nailln 111 PO ; Hv14i � nl� a 0 a M, .N H o + . y.�, ►Li �•a4�tp rb:� op} �a� �t! t..0 IIrH s Yq JPI L o v .t.a _ alnrim nn• ...,.io an _ 1 '� • f Li _-_j,r s� a. a �9 •. 0� �i1 N..' .U,Ddi Rat : ry��. t .r;]�n �•. irn no or. �s.,uln, 1 L U ■Iillll�I I 1fUl! ,1 r O H. 1111111111 - �/ _ p III:�� \ti _ •.447:4 I. sA Wd �I I I G /u.:�' ,,■� / tee,41,1,„ 7 i TAR '> � � � v H- T I I I o+ f . of SPIN -�' _1 . 14 piID'...............W 090 .. - PaliiQ 1 1 11 ( 1_14*°,-.-'..'' o ���igli I_�� �� • `� ®a � i=iilii ovty�:�x'•,e •v = I50THSTW iL gil Noii�• ■LI.UH .. 1- Ili HI THSTW. ,j',-- •�� m jO ai`•ie? :Pam i► ' �7 , .. ;® D�0�'1 •1� � } r—r— : � 01111-111 A•�IYi �..0 rpm■ 7. . O�4, vGI. S g11111r+ I `-, ..... ■ �n loom -=un.5 5-yr. �`` N�ITrr �� 1._ Gc lll�e .�lJ > �;LiN — ear Q� IIIJIo. _ ® a_ • . n.``g. may% ti 3xZ. .i.4",, ,, �:I..:.;)yam ••,... 1rrs�, ®��Q�.z U 1 ml�kill ,, ;:.0`` `:07• �I ULIII: - ` navGv.l(TII't�'t'tm - � �r v - -- pminnn1111 \ ae Mnril *.QIII s,G• my:::lll�;ils;.LL &Mk • 'I\ 14 1 a� lig s1 _ . fiq I' 1. 'E � ..H s a ,! ® �`:' `1,H• . o�Y r ,P -z, • : \‘ I N rI k":e� ■11► � :11 �„:iiig 5 �L� = ► � �`�,. ,'.J• -i. C l CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Water Resources 9-21 AppValley Water Utility Water Use Water use in Apple Valley from 1996 to 2016 is de- scribed in Figure 9.8. More detailed information is The City of Apple Valley is committed to delivering Historical Water Use provided in the current and previous DNR Water safe, clean drinking water to the community in a Growth has not occurred as rapidly as projected in Supply Plans. water system that will meet the needed demand previous plans such as the Water Emergency and Some key water demand factors to note include: and supply water for fire suppression. The City Conservation Plan (2006) or the City's Compre- Average Daily Demand: The average daily de- routinely updates its water supply plan, water hensive Plan (2009). Previous plans projected the mand (total annual demand divided by 365) has rates, and capital improvement plan to ensure that 2016 population served to be 66,641 people while the plans are current, relevant, and effective to begun to exhibit a downward trend over the last the actual reported 2016 population served was decade. The past 5-year average is 5.9 MGD, meet the City's needs into the future. The plans approximately 50,350 people. However, future serve as guides for construction, operation, and which is a decrease from the 5-year average of growth and increased population and resulting wa- 6.6 MGD reported in the 2006 DNR Water Supply maintenance of the municipal water system. ter demand is anticipated, as addressed in a fol- Plan. Apple Valley completed a Water Supply and Dis- lowing section. tribution Plan in October 2002 and a DNR Water Emergency and Conservation Plan in October Figure 9.8 Historical Water Demand 1996 through 2016 2006 (Amended in March 2008), which were re- HISTORICAL WATER DEMAND PROJECTIONS viewed in conjunction with the 2030 Comprehen- 50.0 50.00 sive Plan. 45.0 - - 45.00 Metropolitan Council requires that the City submit 40.0 - 40.00 a Water Supply Plan as part of the 2040 compre- 35.0 35.00 hensive plan update. In addition, all public water a 30.0 30.00 2 suppliers in Minnesota that operate a public water Z z5.o 25.00 distribution system, serve more than 1,000 people W and/or all cities in the seven-county metropolitan F zo.o v 20.00 area, must have a water supply plan approved by o 15.0 15.00 the Department of Natural Resources (DNR). ToW 10.0 10.00 obtain more detail about Apple Valley's existing a 5.0 - 5.00 and future water supply, see the 2018 Minnesota DNR Water Supply Plan, on file with the City. oo , ooh o 0 0.00 tL A k,Y try YEAR _Maximum Day Demantl average Day Gemantl A[[]i Precipitation)in)-MSP Airport Gage CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Water Resources 9-22 APPValley Total Per Capita Water Demand: Total per capita Table 9.12 Large Volume Users Maximum Daily Demand: Maximum daily de- water demand for Apple Valley has begun to ex- Gallons per %Total Customer mand over the past decade does not appear to be Year Annual Use hibit a downward trend since the adoption of the exhibiting an upward or downward trend. Maxi- City's 2006 Water Conservation Plan.Over the last Minnesota Zoo 64,686,000 3.53% mum day demand generally occurs during a sum- Cedar Knolls Mobile decade,the average total per capita water demand Homes 33,086,000 1.81% mer month when precipitation is at its lowest is 122.E gpcd, average which is a decline from the amount and irrigation is at its highest amount.An- g Eastview High School 15,952,000 0.87% of 135.8 gpcd reported in the 2006 plan. Sprinkler A nual precipitation data from the Minneapolis-St. Cobblestone Lake Paul Airport can be an indicator, but does not al- Unaccounted (Non-revenue) Loss: Unac- Master Association 15,868,000 0.87% ways correlate to maximum day demand. counted for water use is the volume of water with Kingston Green 15,581,000 0.85% drawn from all source water minus the volume of Apartments Peaking Factor: The water demand peaking fac- water delivered. The value represents water"lost" Eastview High School 9,630,000 0.53% tor is the ratio of the average maximum day to the Sprinkler B by miscalculated water use due to inaccurate me- QuarryPoint Park Ath average day. The DNR has set a goal of reducing ters, water lost through leaks or water that is used letic Complex Sprinkler 8,096,000 0.44% the average 10-year peaking factor to less than but unmetered or otherwise undocumented. The Apple Valley Estates LP 7,030,000 0.38% 2.6.Apple Valley achieved this goal with a 10-year DNR has set a goal of reducing unaccounted for Uponor 6,404,000 0.35% average peaking factor of 2.5 for 2007-2016. This water to less than 10%. Apple Valley's exceeds Paradise Car Wash 5,692,000 0.32% was an improvement over the previous peaking this goal with a recent 5-year average unaccounted factor from 1996—2006, which was 2.8. for water of 9.3%. This was an improvement over Residential Per Capita Water: The DNR has set the previous 5-year average of 12%reported in the a goal of reducing the residential per capita water 2006 plan. demand to less than 75 gallons per capita per day Large Volume Water Users: The ten largest wa- (gpcd). The City's recent 5-year average equaled ter users are shown in Table 9.12. These custom- this goal of 75 gpcd, which was an improvement ° ers account for approximately 10% of the annual over the previous 5-year average of 91 gpcd re- consumption of water. ported in the 2006 plan. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Water Resources 9-23 p`ppValley Water Demand Projections Table 9.13 Projected Annual Water Demand The projected annual water demand through 2040 Projected Total Projected Population Projected Total Projected Aver- Projected ear Population Served Per Capita Water age Daily De- Maximum Daily is summarized in Table 9.13. The Metropolitan p Demand(GPCD) mand(MGD) Demand(MGD) Council provided the projected populations for the years 2020, 2030 and 2040. The population pro- 2017 51,713 50,629 122.6 6.2 15.2 jections for all other years were extrapolated. The 2018 52,975 52,079 122.6 6.4 15.7 difference between the total population and popu- lation served is based on estimates provided in the 2019 54,238 53,530 122.6 6.6 16.1 Metropolitan Council "Thrive MSP 2040"forecast. 2020 55,500 54,980 122.6 6.7 16.5 Over the last decade,the total per capita water de- mand has exhibited an average annual reduction 2021 55,870 55,399 122.6 6.8 16.6 of 2.5%. The projected total per capita demand in 2017 is based on the average total per capita de- 2022 56,240 55,818 122.E 6.8 16.8 mand over the last ten years. This is equal to 2023 56,610 56,237 122.E 6.9 16.9 122.6 gpcd.The City considered reducing the total _ per capita demand estimate in the projections, but 2024 56,980 56,656 122.6 6.9 17.0 decided to keep it steady at the 10-year average rate of 122.6 gpcd due to the uncertainty of the 2025 57,350 57,075 122.E 7.0 17.2 water usage requirements of future residential, 2030 59,200 59,170 122.6 7.3 17.8 commercial and industrial land use development. The projected average day demand is equal to the 2040 63,600 63,520 122.E 7.8 19.1 total per capita per day multiplied by the projected GPCD-Gallons per Capita per Day MGD-Million Gallons per Day population.This is then divided by 1,000,000 to get the average day demand in MGD. The maximum day demand is based on the aver- age annual peaking factor over the last ten years, which is 2.5. For each year the average day de- mand is multiplied by the peaking factor to obtain the maximum day demand in MGD. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Water Resources 9-24 p`PPValley y ,r , yx., �, �8,,A t'3 r„* Existing& Future Water System . i 1 J) - M.i ri. �� - ,,,,. �: I' Y The existing and future water system for the City 1, ' 1 " •I _ ',i ln fir, + '�•- , tl�A of Apple Valley(Figures 9.9, 9.10 and 9.11) con- ' — _ " '- se; --c sists of wells, a water treatment plant(WTP), stor- 0 1 _ 1�"'� age facilities, booster station and watermain rang- . AI" y ing from 6" to 24" diameter located in three (3) " sue. j - `- . i isk - - ' - pressure zones. Each component and its ade- •~ • • µ •`J40' . - I-I _ \ ':‘k , 1 _ quacy for the future based on the 2040 population 1-4116. \ illeW . 'Tillitilr•Plia`1"" '_ �p � ,[,� � -� - projections and land use map is described in more yr , Y y �4'r ..0..h7.1, . 1001;. _# 46 —. detail in the following sections. law.A‘' ��,w � — Groundwater Wells„�01411111V iiz - !� The City's 20 wells ranging from 487'to 1127'deep -- .mac...,► . -� �,� ' 7 *+�,1, w- "#dam_• '� „� draw drinking water from the Jordan, Prairie Du ""� }_ � r kat Chien -Jordan and Mt. Simon ground-water aqui- fers (See Table 9.15 and Figure 9.11). Five of these wells in the Jordan and Mt. Simon aquifers The 2030 Comprehensive Planning effort pro- Table 9.14 2030 and 2040 Comprehensive Plan are available only for emergency use. jected significantly high water demands due to Comparison greater population projections and higher per cap- Population Average Day Max Day ita water use projections. The comparison be- Year Served Demand Demand (MGD) (MGD) tween previous planning effort projections and the Previous 2030 current ones are summarized in Table 9.14. Projection 71,200 9.70 24.20 Current 2030 59,170 7.30 17.80 Projection Current 2040 63,520 7.80 19.10 Projection CITY OF APPLE VALLEY I 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update s•�• Water Resources 9-25 Apple Table 9.15 Water Supply Wells The total capacity of Apple Valley's active wells III and emergency wells is 24,350 gpm (35 MGD). Well Unique Year In- Capacity Well Depth Geologic Unit Status The firm capacity of the system, which assumes No. Well No. stalled (gpm) (Feet) the largest well out of service, is 22,350 gpm (32 1 205824 1963 600 520 Jordan Emergency Only MGD). The firm capacity without emergency wells 2 205825 1964 900 530 Jordan Emergency Only 3 205812 1962 1,000 584 Jordan Emergency Only is 18,150 gpm (26 MGD).To meet the needs of the 4 205820 1971 1,200 504 Jordan Active system, firm capacity should equal or exceed the 5 207677 1974 1,300 487 Jordan Active maximum day demand in accordance with AWWA 6 127263 1976 1,200 507 Jordan Active (American Water Works Association) recommen- 7 127277 1977 1,250 494 Jordan Active dations. The current wells will meet the 2040 pro- 8 127297 1979 1,300 506 Jordan Active jected maximum demand of 19.1 MGD. 9 151561 1981 1,200 515 Jordan Active The locations for future Wells No. 21, 22, 23 and 10 151563 1982 1,200 502 Jordan Active 24 were selected at the time of the last compre- 11 191943 1985 1,400 493 Jordan Active hensive plan in 2006 when greater increase in 12 449257 1989 1,400 494 Jordan Active 13 433284 1989 1,500 516 Jordan Active population and water demand were expected. As 14 509056 1990 900 1120 Mt.Simon Emergency Only indicated above, these wells are not expected to 15 519955 1993 900 1127 Mt.Simon Emergency Only be needed by 2040. However, they will remain in 16 205823 2000 1,300 510 Prairie du Chien-Jordan Inactive the City's plan and continue to be evaluated. 17 603075 2001 1,800 513 Jordan Active 18 674495 2004 1,800 515 Jordan Active 19 731113 2006 1,600 510 Jordan Active 20 778046 2011 1,900 495 Jordan Active CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Water Resources 9-26 AppValley Figure 9.9 Water Distribution System BURNSVILLE PKWY E �emstImII�II.II.II�IIIII�IInII�IImII�1I�11sIIiII�II�II�II�II�II�II�IINIIMII�II�II �I mIIIoIImImunimImII�III�II�I IIM mi.miIilmI�ImI� , 1 !rl�.'' 1Wil Water Treatment Plant ' LEBANON HILLS RE�,oRAI RARR e Valleywood Reservoir ®`. MINNESOTA �oURoo 0VALLEYWOo b Longridge Reservoir , ZOOLOGICAL °a GARDENS °m l -,' 0 125TH ST W d Nordic Reservoir _ �,�yei ,.c {_+ ii C�Palomino Reservoir OU PS F �4p5 ri� ,• ,0 `. ! *Quarry Point Water Tower • ��� -, ! — ! PS Nordic Booster Station J 114 ' 44111y� A Pressure Reducing Valves I ,,at k:�; ' 8� i� —24"Water Main .I ' / ..'� �7 20"Water Main r � .. o- >r` r..I•� ��1in PS A,. ;.. —16"Water Main so ROE - _, J —12"Water Main MGP nEws ��` ,� - 10"Water Main rrr_i, 1 ,�•=m 138TH ST E �. 5 n � '� _ 8"Water Main L �.TJ{ 6"Water Main as1®■ 16"Future Trunk Main i r• 1 � ry, �3.n 5' :PI -- 12"Future Trunk Main e 0 ; , ,z . 0 8"Future Water Main \=.� eLLVia.. . 1 =,., _ City Limits i ?,.. ,_. 3�}�,, 4 a rc A 140TH ST W ..}�r� _ o r:4Ife Mk ,' w, 0_. m a k m U — ` x o A '� fi: �_ s Water r ii Distribution System I b Existing t`� i I _150TH ST�--i 15OTH STW v' and I �� ...�....,�.;. 111 % 00• Ir System I i : . I : . Z � i a r[ � �+ 111 ! Y... a-",' f ��rl` Shown with Water Main Sizes Y ST ° _ l l A-'.1 ICI -�� 160TH ST W aI I�1 �I I ,. iiilk 1� I� �I�I j PJ H �I� ••IMIM1I �1 11�I�1�1�1�1�I�1�1��1�11.1�1�11•I�IM1 I�IMINEI�IM.MI II�II�IN ....,.....:, ♦ i CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Water Resources 9-27 AppValley Figure 9.10 Pressure Zones&Interconnects High Zone Middle Zoneis IWTPIWater Treatment Plant Low Zone glet. Valleywood Reservoir �1(; / t High Zone e Longridge Reservoir HGL=1220 ft 125THSTw Nordic Reservoir t#t r� y4^ u �:�` aCVO •. rim `t C Palomino Reservoir V *Quarry Point Water Tower le i . P5 Nordic Booster Station ,, .,, _ 1`� �'■j. � p Pressure Reducing Valves 4111 mitp . •���"Ism Ilili ,� OE Emergency Interconnection e' '� RosemountPressure Zone ° HGL=1106 ftwSk•E.-- .. r.....,,VA z ` —High(HGL=1220 k) Evermoor Pkwy�, 4 o ,� �1 —Middle(HGL=1150 k) J ��� �� ' tiY -L Transm=1115) Burnsville r v � . ��� Future Transmission Main HGL=1206 ft Cty Rd 11 -� � APIA�� Il� ' gh VA*W `Al�. -_.MLoddle w ` _ , ■ j W�� IIPIlitfoCow`, ! . City Limits Middle Zone r� @ i HGL=1150 ft 1�alIP r�, ` ; 12MIi , .g0argliii rzs f1 r� d 1� : Water Distribution `� g a �r �1 tr P. Rosemount I rc li gir°a -D eilimi I t IN HGL=1106ft System Y 'T�' 145th St W �� ° Low Zone ��Y V �',� ,,,,,„, HGL=1115 ft (�v t Existing ,,,,c0,, _-� 150TH ST _611MIMM MM. 150TH STW and r��r..■■ i' •�� ` proirA Future r„,:: -11� r I �� Rosemount System Shown with ��r t i IV 4 I P Pressure Zones . , HGL=1106 ft Cty Rd 42 S al.I 11.1 Sri jh I I ZIA Ilif.:74>4...1.‘ i MN ITV — rip ip.--ni itsN LLip ,�160TX ST ,r_r_r_r_r_..A n=. HGL=1121ft �°RE25 Granada Ave 1 ...,,.....m... CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Water Resources 9-28 AppValley Figure 9.11 Water Supply Wells , 4 — 0-•—•—•—•—•excemaleWm0 .... ..ee. —•—•r•—•—•— (SW)Southwest District '1 / / i• ■Lift Stations (sw1)southwest District-LS#4 (r— (SW2)SouthwestDistrict-LS#5 �, �i i LEBANON HILLS I V 1 • • Forcemain (SW3)Southwest District-LS#11 L--_-_--t fE1ONP,p„,„ I SE4 ,; Gravity Trunk Sewer (5W4)Southwest District-Ls#2 Available Capacity Mixaesora MUNICIPAL(SE)South uutDieDistrict V ; f,�'FCOUPSE Y (sE)soutneastDistrict I I' ca.oeM: 1� Surcharging (SE1)Farquar Lake District-LS#1 M644A •� I 1rrr,srw 11 L.L 0%to 20%Remaining (SE2)Fa rquar Lake District-LS t• • •© •L .--.--.--.—J � zs (5E3)Farquar Lake District-LS#10 0" = I t ( -1 I �20%to 40%Remaining (SE4)Valleywoorl ,�p'�yI, r E r - I �40%to 60%Remaining (BI)Burnsville Outlet-LS#3 p5 I ' `t _# LS`#2 tL •a (Bz)Burnsville ounet-eurnsvine LS �'�``�' + `--�•_— ` • ••LS#10 /-` — —60%to 80%Remaining (E1)Eagan Outlet-West ' A •"�< �- _ J r y' L I �80%to 100%Remaining (E2)Eagan Outlet-East B1 - a �'SW4 \ �/"q 1 —Gravity Sewer I �� SE3 —i . 4 J Diversion Valve L/���— ^f� r 1 ••MCES Interceptor Sewer ` • �,,#�LLS 7l' • `i i�� 1—I ` 1 III / J p`` \ •�• ®Eagan Connection B �— r ROE ` 1'`.r _— y�� SEMI ,'�-,..1LS#9 @ MCES Meter/Connection l sPN`^a • �Q \/ ` LS#1 I �jL•. ©Burnsville Connection w ///l�v1-','�V / o�J ',••,'� 1Ira , 1 (vl/ I , ..1. 138TH srE Burnsville'LS� �. , l' K J J �U_ � C 1 SE2 .• iSW1\ . I )71i • 1 0• I ..LS#4 K. v140TH STw ` l o• U SW _ g Sanitary \y 7 I I �� t• Sewer \r System CO � � Available capacity I �y� G j Q Average Day tir _ A `R90 1 r Y� U- Flow 6.12 rncD t r — o �F I // f Existing System iI. syTy,s,T,w. >,-h<--i ( L- ---- — tt/ e• .r' I o II . >elI i l� e I Trunk —3 > __� 1- "0 1 Available Capacity I ;V I System IAverage Day f, , �_ \\_..: i ��J ///r Flow 6MGD Available Capacity L l//\,\ LS#5 • 2 Q C I. .• + 'l' `' 1� `.l� / now00.]SMGD I lll' ‘Y' I Remaining 1i�Z I` »"11 I'-Al �� -'"/'14' 'v ! Capacity LS#11\ . 1 `/�y,�_��_^� II r i 1 111� iv y ae� v M643` I J\ r M648 M644 y' .M. I . IMD w.• 160Tmm:T= —_,,AmM•c..e.-•'rr1l� .M.=.=.M.MMEII, .-..teal &I ul.• zemame loge•—-—-—•—•— M) • - e 0 lJ R , • CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 1 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Water Resources 9-29 AppValley Emergency Interconnections amount of flow through the connection point to Water Source Alternatives maintain adequate pressure within the distribution Five Interconnections with adjacent distribution system. Apple Valley's access to surface water is through systems have been established (See Table 9.16) an emergency connection with the City of Burns- Rosemount, Lakeville, and Burnsville are all able villa. The City of Burnsville treats both water from and can be used for emergency and auxiliary wa- to supply water to Apple Valley. To utilize the in- the Kramer Quarry(gravel mining operation)along ter supply. terconnections, each city would need to evaluate the Minnesota River in addition to groundwater. A Table 9.16 Emergency Interconnections their system needs to ensure adequate water for plan for additional surface water treatment has not domestic and fire use. been completed and is not considered practical. Other Water Supply Capacity(GPM &MGD) System Owner BURNSVILLE- COUNTY 174 TO 347 GPM,0.25 TO RD 11 .x, a 1 0.5 MGD(8 INCH) -. :: . N, ROSEMOUNT- EVER- 347 GPM,0.5 MGD TO 1.5 '_. i 44°.. }. g. «' t. MOOR PARKWAY MGD(12-INCH) " W� ROSEMOUNT DIA- 347 GPM,0.5 MGD(8 INCH) r MOND PATH ROSEMOUNT DOVE 347 GPM,0.5 MGD(8-INCH) TRAIL A LAKEVILLE GRANADA "" 347 GPM,0.5 MGD(8-INCH) AVENUE d° All five(5)emergency interconnections are subject s e j , , , .�, : ,� '�' r. " ,_F TMr .r to water availability.They are utilized only with prior . '; L* ' 2 ,7t : , ; ,-_ authorization and coordination with the re- quest- *�. a�k „y '` -i� g•yy{{ z4,, ," J ;µFr* ,-. r '{ b Y'r ing city. r r * '4'�F' { x5- aka ''?L "l -- I ,' 'r y'4�,. a Wyk" f ,,-- Under emergency conditions, Apple Valley could , -. ` provide water to the communities of Burnsville, r '� 5 = `,.• -,- - Rosemount, and Lakeville. Water supply capacity y; -1 `- .. . Airy a1 i4 - ' .-• •i y a, '� �'� <_: will be dependent on available WTP capacity -'` f�Y - ` ` i ' �{ �.�v.'; ;�f ` above the current daily water demand during the Via`>.7 ''i ' ;�- -. c Y ,�, r c , emergency.When an emergency connection is im- ` ,� k , : .. A : ti '- r plemented, it is recommended to monitor pressure `'- 'f 'M 14 i '• ,,� 4 , ,r,� ' , (T f:, upstream at the nearest hydrant to gauge the '��� ai"''`3 . . ,.' i %•._.�. "l!s '01 .i:'r ��40r'l�.: ar . . '.'{ , / 3 ,p j.� CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Water Resources 9-30 p`PPValley Water Treatment can be filtered out in the filter cells.The water then demand can be met without bypassing the filters. flows through approximately 30" of sand media, However, during some of the maximum demand The water treatment plant (WTP) was originally where the iron and manganese (no longer in sus- days a portion will need to be bypassed. designed and constructed in 1988 to treat 12 pension) are trapped on top of the media. The fil- MGD. In 1997, a filter bypass line was added so a tered water is then treated with chlorine and fluo- Water Storage portion of the flow could be diverted around the fil- ride prior to flowing to the clearwell for storage until Apple Valley stores water in six existing storage ter cells if usage was expected to exceed the de- needed. From the clearwell, water flows by gravity structures as summarized in Table 9.16. Usable sign capacity. The bypass water was blended with to the pumping chamber and is pumped to the dis- storage is defined as the storage available while the treated water prior to the chemical addition of tribution system and reservoirs. still maintaining a sufficient residual pressure with- chlorine and fluoride. By utilizing the bypass and in the distribution system. For Apple Valley, this is increasing the backwashing frequency, it was pos- Well 16 has been offline since 2013 and is cur- rently listed as inactive status. The water supply when the storage water level is within 40' of the sible to produce more than the designed 12 MGD. high-water level in the reservoirs or towers. A wa- Under ideal circumstances,a maximum of 19 to 20 can be further augmented by utilizing emergency g backup wells(Wells 1, 2, and 3)which pump water ter storage analysis was conducted to evaluate the MGD was processed at the WTP. To ensure that ability of the existing storage to meet equalization, the filter bypass water did not adversely impact the directly into the distribution system and are not treated by the WTP.These emergency wells have fire and emergency storage,which are de-fined as treated water quality, a maximum 20")/0 bypass ca- follows: pacity was recommended, limiting the total plant individual chlorine feed systems. Wells 14 and 15 capacity to 16.25 MGD. are also considered emergency backup wells but Equalization Storage — Capacity to meet peak feed into the WTP. They are both constructed in hour demands while operating at a constant flow. In 2015, Apple Valley expanded and upgraded the the Mt. Simon aquifer and the City is restricted WTP.The expansion added four filter cells and two Fire Storage—Capacity to meet fire demands. p from utilizing them to meet water demand. backwash tanks increasing the total plant capacity Emergency Storage—Capacity to meet demands to 24.4 MGD. The 24.4 MGD assumes the WTP is The projected maximum water demand in 2030 during a supply or transmission pipeline outage. functional at 100% capacity with the twelve filter and 2040 is 17.8 MGD and 19.1 MGD respectively. p y ° Current treatment capacity without the filter by- Based on the future water demand projects and an cells and at the recommended 20% bypass capac- average water demand of 7.8 MGD and maximum pass is 18 MGD and 24.4 MGD with the filter by- ity. cur- pass limited to 20% of the total plant capacity. By- day demand of 19.1 MGD needed in 2040,the Currently, 17 of the City's 20 wells feed into the passing is initiated at approximately 16 to 17 MGD rent storage facilities will continue to meet equali- WTP. Water from the wells is initially treated with in anticipation of higher demands. The cur- rent zation storage needs, provide adequate fire flow chlorine and sodium permanganate (NaMnO4). water treatment plant is therefore capable of capacity and provide emergency storage. These chemicals are used as oxidants to bring the meeting the projected demands. Much of the iron and manganese out of suspension so they CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Water Resources 9-31 APPValley Table 9.16 Water Storage the changes made within the distribution system is adequate for domestic use and fire protection. Available/ as well as in response to changes with water sys- Available fire analysis is shown in Figure 9.13. Structure Type of Storage Usable Stor- tern demands. Overall, the system can provide a minimum of 500 Name Structure Capacity age Capac- (Gallons) ity(Gallons) The performance of a finished water distribution gpm of available fire flow throughout the system. system is judged by its ability to deliver the re- A majority of the water system can provide at least Longridge Ground 4,000,000 3,000,000 quired flows (customer demands and fire-fighting 1,500 gpm or more of available fire flow at a resid- Reservoir Storage Palomino Ground needs) while maintaining adequate system pres- ual pressure of 20 psi. An available fire flow of Reservoir Storage 3,300,000 1,320,000 sures and water quality. Meeting these require- 1,500 gpm is typically adequate for a majority of Nordic Ground ments, in part, depends on the components within facilities within the system. Facilities needing fire Reservoir Storage 2,000,000 1,290,000 the existing system including transmission and flow greater than 1,500 gpm are typically in com- Valleywood Ground 2,000,000 1,220,000 distribution piping, elevated water towers and mercial and industrial land use areas along major Reservoir Storage Quarry Point Elevated ground storage reservoirs. street corridors that typically are served by 12-inch 1 Tower Storage ,500,000 1,500,00o and greater water transmission pipelines. Analysis of pressures throughout the distribution Water Treat Other- system based on maximum day demand of 19.1 ment Plant 2,000,000 1,500,000 w Clearwell MGD are shown in Figure 9.12. 10 States Stand- ''N' t'' Clearwell 9 r '' ., Total NA 14,800,000 9,830,000 ards recommends water pressures between 35 psi •"'' 4 * i fj « ,. and 80 psi. A majority of the system falls with in a s . Distribution System Hydraulic Analysis r desired level of service of 50 to 80 psi. Near pres- ! Icr The water distribution system consists of water- sure zone boundaries, the system could be ana- ,/ • {1 . '�f (,� �(( main ranging in size from 6" to 24" in diameter lyzed to determine the ability to expand the upper ^-, '`a (Figure 9.9) and located throughout the city. The pressure zone without exceeding 80 to 100 psi. 44111441.IM r' ` �,i. , ,. �:4 .,, ,�,. distribution system is divided into three pressure When pressure exceeds 80 psi a pressure reduc- •,.1A" r I ' '/' 1 ` . -". " '_ „ r` e .'' p/, '- J r it I. zones (Figure 9.10) to provide appropriate pres- ing valve is required per the State Plumbing Code. i .• - q, ; , itl k ,; , ' , f sures to residents. There are a few small areas were pressures range ' ' The City's hydraulic model of the distribution sys- from 30 to 40 psi near ground storage reservoirs :r,I, • , -. .i-‘., . 0, •, . 1 tem was updated and calibrated in 2017. It is used or near the edge of a pressure zone boundary. In .,. ' �` as a dynamic tool for development and redevelop- areas near ground storage reservoirs, individual . T e ,r �r ,•., 4 « ar . • f, i�r ment planning and used to support policymakers in-house boosters would be recommended for ar- rye - with multi-million dollar decisions to address infra- eas with limited amount of homes effected by low structure needs. The hydraulic model will be con- pressures. In these few areas where the water ,. tinuously updated and evolve in response to pressure is lower,the water pressure/psi and flow A :, CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Water Resources 9-32 APPValley Figure 9.12 Future System Static Pressures Ilrir.„ r 86-67 6sf]2�1" Ig + Static Pressure(psi) % e3 as e)..�`s'F 7d# +10s WTP Water Treatment Plant <30 psi 81 61 7 82,d 00"y63 }i 0 30-39 psi 0 t% ' )4 84-r REGIONAL PA. d6 8 Valleywood Reservoir ss n }a )z ]] +10 1 1 40-49 psi ` +'0*`i6' 7� 71 81 07 73�� 3 # d Longridge Reservoir I 150-59 psi 111as B7 77�n]4 66 55 g �MZOOLOGICAL eoiic 180.69 psi111.9}.es ro 76 e)63 66 % 85 ad.g GARDENS Nordic Reservoir I 170-79 psi 111 06 79 %ee 82 1 +7'y"t,79.74 % 7° 69 51�SO�i2 3]�i 5{3;,64 53'4684'6 sT it C=J Palomino Reservoir C 180-89 psi ^,`' 95 % 67 + 3 ez 80 eo B2,�s'/ si�43. S9 4rJ 69 - I '�'" i3744s. 9 1 99-99 psi •(P� 89 70 n 64 64 80 6 79 04 41 41 52. { 61 65 % 5a 46 i 51 P y c9J`69 ; + �, .4 4g w ; 48 Quarry* Point Water Tower Q' 161� % )s %+ fi 6 1 "P y�l ei Mi ee ti.96 d�sr 55 % sz � %)fi ss 484e•++ 100+psi \ate 100 t& O1 49 55 t "93 "' t }1 " 89 89 96 95 90 42 51 i 52..JC- 99 85 % 19+0 so g2)0� �� �2 . Bit 81•]0 T6 83 79 96 96 98 93449,4 95 �/��y1 46� �51W 'Ol-J5 JB 651 62 61 + PS Nordic Booster Station /y. % 4F+]0 82 93 g�77 Bt 7]]8 ]8 00 ++ -• �T.6 52 69 76 ]0 ]0 rs fi + 101� " *}03 7 9 9 5 65 60 55 »]6 •1'� ]9 )) s 2 48 4357 1 dg % J6 }5 'a 89 y69 0 Pressure Reducing Valves 70 ]0 7U ]3 92{%88 ]4 ]6 76 80 194 4,55 85 83 96 7] 69 03 t 94 0` +6 ]0 64+% 63 64 8• 74 4Y T5 - __ 5]61 '3` �% ]5' g 8J 81 gg 'fi Pressure Zone 93 89 84+�.68 J1 03 55 61 % 06 ) 75 78 3 7d°fB0 J9U ]4 67 ]9 3 74 e)1 1 So 65 +mod CA' ] ag�'],o�i•��ay}�p�l{61 }] }a t % 5° n go si s % 7 5 )e 6] ,High(HGL=1220 ft) 93 95 65 % 't 80 ]J'fifi J,62r- - 1'�1i 04 79157X. 6s 4'"tes150 sa 73 86 rs gg + Middle(HGL=1150 ft) /rr93 8] ]3 53 68 84%iLrr 8]89 90 % 9/ 8677 79 89 01 6) we 46 BJ '6L-}2 6] 49 d2 4g}s }'� Jam+ BJ.85 63 sz 95 93 ...S7 ' I. R,'+E 56 64)S n 73 }8�81 +#1 92 ]090,E78gg % gg 54 }8 LOW HGL=111516 jj59�..p+l. R51 uuu��� 028] ii939182)9 9.101 53 60 83 / ^R 8] ( )72 77 7 - n'o�N 59 79 72 68 46 03 . ]8 01 83 93 y�e3 69 % s3 � �� '�F 7s ` a n'k ad 64 63465 ea 7 9 0 Pressure Zone Boundary i 104 57 0] 1•91`+ y86Y 8274 9189 ]0 )2 . 69 64 % 6} Q 75 70 47 57 81 )5 09 0] 95 % JO4e, . 07138TH ST E 1,. c(1 ]d 62 y 50X 81b Cit Limits 67 %s n� s9 % s} ��• ]e'! e1� so s d96 as 65 n e2 �. 7g 'l]s 174 7e 74 � Y 66 40%�% 0]O � 80 05 J3]SYY 01 81 81 82 wt. 75 58 55 ♦ 85 76 0] %62 5) 1 _.1.4 65 86 03 ]8 ]8 a2 M 76 �82 80 ! 42 49 % 42 61 53�Sg�49;40 � 00 � �98 �.,10 �10 fi 79 ]6 r6� T7 82.81 61 50 � 59{ 51 65]3 W T F 1 U 70 g0 7g.81 80 i + •62 fi3 79 71+6)�� 1.49 .. F 78 42, 51 53 59i'65�+.y7 a+49 +6507911'"'66 qa 4'58% '5 78 %t4 l6 y r7 81 `+^� �Sjy y� 82 Z 81 62 64 6. 64 60 ` - 58 76 ]5 7g ]8 g1 60��d 62 991. . Wirt, 48 49 +49 42106 59 2 ]8 n .....12 73 M 78 80 63 79 �+ 8] 49 4a t nh4) 43 8, .41. 5] ..S8 58 O. 52 % ai T7'.•! o 6 n 7 1]9 77 '7'5°51 54 49 47r51 5 45 62.E 66 80 52 50 46 82 %55'rs' 48 45/J72 07 83 ]6 79 zo 74 ]3 % 62 fi1 82 63 50 59 55 + * d4 32 f.]e (} l62 81 5] 45 51 51 39 61 Sg 53 49 52 54 5] 52+ 47 %82 5° 45 45 f49_ ) ]0 i6 8]7 t° i. /62 61 51 .+I 1 551iF • 1} `� �V a Bo 61 sa i TH ST W ! 7 34 5 y --+�AM +, ! T p 62 5a 5] % di•52 fis 84,gyy6.6}� 5/ 35 --�53 69�„-49�69 69 52'g'7.67 8]'ll�]2� n ` J > 5 :4" 33 06 % 59 6]53 56 7'69 ¶ 3fijsop766 �61 > 65T g5 69 64 62 B0 "1 61 K 50 49, 50 M '1 gp'411+64 56 59 52 < 85 63 to 52 88 73 65 -. 5 116.1661 d9 55 �/y T�/y O fi0 +Sg mow% '39 52 56 54153 59 65 125] %" ` 61 60 fi 4• l'�tisr�11. 51 63 m 4.... 52 Y 61 Water q7,4],,,,53 54 54 55 49+ 80 Sgll. 6z s] � 67 ss r ..53....A 56 85 '0 sa off 1 •6 82 89 Y 53 51 J % W% 65 54 Sg 55 O 63 58 t]2 471 3 39:39+1 iY S6♦58 55 51148'S] 63 59 fd % 39 11wS8`yO 66 66 66 .46j1.69.8] 0 %55. 56 6 56 59�8, 62 69�.691]2 % w '53 57 5) % 54 6.7 57 05 64 65 66462 SI }160 67 es e % 6344......q...5,555, 55.BV57 55 601.y.�-`65L- ',-`70 61 , Distribution C .Z 3� '6+4_ 4s3 57 67' 66 1 w % B6 i 59 55 �51 83.2.4 „F r66+• ea sz}' '� 33,�y 56 59�.+�. 82 ,I0Y 66 1+4.%I 67 6r* et. 54 55 54 58�- 61 +• C 8 42 53 S8 57 58 fit % ., 1r67 66 88 67 es 67 . 54 55 35 I 52 63 62 System 4% Q % 89]0 w 54 54 - 35 58 wag. 59 63 63 OGtiT 352+��35 59 ��59 60 6y8, 62 %83 Q %'r%86� 87 71)0 69 6%8 83 S6 54 S3„ '�° 55^�%55'S5 55 54 % 66 r5g fi% 60 83 +63 �,�' S0 % B0 61%81�63y62 BB Br %68 ,69 ]0 B8/ 63 . 53 56 55 %l56 56 5,6A 36 f 591.7 5J, 58`fio\0,9045} 30. . 62v� 648465815 \"G;748 '06r67 W5/ r54TSq 62i_64:15] 59 .61: 826262_61608485:% %88 67% 6564 .: 5556355] % S7 % 38 634 63 63 62 98 so 39 62 6/ • % s161684. 1 68 6 1'�6;^ 51 tiIE wF1L W 5716 + % ss 38 �r56+s+62 60 59 58 59 61 r 65 64 46 65 % 60 %92 % 64 56 35 55 35 S6 60 5B 38 S1i 66 fia BO.60 61 `50THST" 65 6]60 68 55 54 -� 61� Future System 99 80 OM 61 62t83t71 .65 % 85 69 67`%r' 65 63. 51 531 65 Q 63 55 c1 41" 60 62 61 W•+ �1F 65+'S{ 38 eo r, ie 6e 6B 88 %47,i r11 59 57 44" 31 ]3 59+1 TO 65%66 59y<`T 94661:61:4+666 Static .% 64 O 62469 63 61 64 6. .1'* ik 88 89 . "Ire 59 57 ...{...+' i r0 !7r#62 r 57% Jtat li W 3e 61 t, 64+ 64' 64 fi 66 87 % % -69 71 rty 70 I +67 6 69 72 fit% 6g 'Ot]1 ]i W 10 69 '70 61��66 y 60 61L. 6> t 65 %Y65 65 %65 65 � 68}rt r, '0 69: } 66 72 r, '70% 89,76 66+ Pressures �� 65 WO ,a •L roc 60 68 85 1 564 6565 es 80 Il.ti/ 'e8 69 � 70 7iv. iO4.•477 +% !69s9271 70 70 66 9' (pso W % 68 67 f67 es% 70701 r... )4r71656B89 67% 641 <6, if. es %66 % .641j15/ 64 65 85 %� 70 :1 71 ]i 65 ]0 r� J2 'U TO 4. ]7'3 2 68 I8 85 84 63 66 % 69% 88 69� � +.-+.� * �55 ]5 % eat)1 12 73 �62 69 70 83 63 62 es 60 67} 75'r0 70 70 70 71 �.. .F.}.4.• 7; 14 44 76 74 76 ] 4 +4631�62 8,4. 81 % 6'7 874.+7. 89]0 1 ]2 74 ]5 y7 75 4 ]0 62 62 81 62 i. M �',1 + 9 .y1 `} + 6) 65 85 81 h82 60 61 W 55 6.511r6 5 65 % %6]%.-lam'%} ;.�i ` �lor'S8 �73•+ 'S -`7ry^ ]5 5 Based on {,��� 70 73 �� ri ]SF1AY7]r8'[75]8 77 + 61 58 85 ..„ 6] 65 70 ],.]o 72 ]0 +'4 J6 ,1. 75]6 74„' 64 61 81 .1.46. 6] 8] 70 )0 T3 72 JS M D D - 19.1 M G D %+ SJ 52 ! 65 67 60 ]2 7A 7a} 71 56 5]5] )2 72 15 63'' 135 t 1 59 ez i5 67 % 46s % _704� iota 73 77�_ 1 9;911 n 73 +70 5 449.+ i 6 '+41 59 81 165' 65 69 68,r 67 6' �" +ti;ro a2 73 73 '2 72 )3 71 70 5) 59El 72 92 ]8 ]5 77 ]6 74 70 A 1/42 70 + 33,45,+434 166 59 )1 ]3 72 71 73 JS J6 7 6 + + 2 i a V 67.17; 45*% 60 68, % 70]o} ...+ 75 77 74 rz sz�186�ss5369 45 9 +as A + 66 60 66 7*'��70 + 71 73 n 73 )3# )2 }3 n- 7''70 69 O o� 54+ + t]+433i45+i60TH sT W 68 66 + } *6]�6616+ 6 + {73 +++72 + ]5 'S ]d 76 76 67 fl 7 ]5 75 76]5 t J CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Water Resources 9-33 AppValley Figure 9.13 Future System Available Fire Flow 1 i Available Fire Flow at 20 psi Less than 500 gpm - WTP Water Treatment Plant U 500-999 gpm LEBANON RILLS REGIONAL PARK U low-1,499 gpm 44111116 /1.� oG Valley wood Valle wood Reservoir 1,500 gpm&above ,�I/n ZOOLOGICAL GARDENS MINNESOTA Go�E�o a`� i ureo El LongridgeReservoir tent 125TH ST W d Nordic Reservoir 'a o py�P��s� tifn `,�` �� J Palomino Reservoir 0 a', Alr� �� a , frioji *Quarry Point Water Tower A ` � P5 Nordic Booster Station leIlat 11111k#All . A. Pressure Reducing Valves AI r � Water Main f..,,r ����1J � ��=_e ..Water Main-Future s Ru E w� ririrffiRratrik ❑ �� DPressure Zone Boundary M6P G 440u Jerry 44� �� o ` City Limits 138TH ST E k'!ViJL 1 p pliP,4i ` �� ow keillisiA 1 1 p-Ael, , el # _ Iii. A,^rem , ,i '� ri. � r ! , a `Toi a 140TH ST W 1 ■ raiz z r imp:, i . II 8 e-,:'� ibitr-1111 << VII 8 '�' Water �`� 1 $ t," fl r. d � _ OA Distribution atiol ..., eSystem ` °2� iiigiaA601 Ill d �;� MP1 Future System ilme=sl� Available riN Fire Flow .r �; at 20 psi r� `1� AO m� r 14' L._ -- fm 1•i 1116.. )114411KI2, '!---,. ma\ �r (gpm) 7,_____ •--�ir ��a r'� 1�. �1�i �►� �► r-� Based on MDD = 19.1 MGD i�3ig It r NI 160TH ST.,A1110001 � I. „ •_1 UAW . i CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 1 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update Water Resources 9-34 AppValley Emergency Response Plan approved by the Minnesota Department of Health for water values have each shown a downward on December 16, 2009. trend since conservation efforts were implemented Water emergencies can occur because of vandal- in 2006. The residential per capita demand has The City's wells are considered susceptible to con- ism,sabotage, accidental contamination, mechan- been reduced from an average of 91 gpcd in 2006 tamination from activities at the land surface. The ical problems, power failings, drought, flooding, to 75 gpcd currently. The peaking factor has been plan provides management strategies that the City and other natural disasters. The purpose of emer- reduced from an average of 2.8 in 2006 to 2.5 cur- has developed to address the vulnerability rating gency planning is to develop emergency response of the aquifer and to protect the water supply, in- procedures Unaccounted water has been reduced from procedures and to identify actions needed to inn- an average of 12% in 2006 to 9%currently. cluding, but not limited to: prove emergency preparedness. • Public education programs on wellhead pro- • *1. a `'," The City has adopted a Federal Emergency Re- tection r••' . • sponse Plan that was certified in December 2014. • Proactive management of existing, unsealed In addition, the current City's DNR Water Supply ` and unused wells >> Plan contains water supply protection measures, ` _ • Proactive management of otherpotential - including, but not limited to, a plan for prioritizing g n ,T� . I` sources of contamination � , � : ' water use, reducing demand and implementing • • . ' � ,<`;, v , �� emergency water connections. • Monitoring of well water levels and possible lP '� ; 9 .� 9 Y « r .d+� E contaminants • " `-..: . t a'` 9 ; Source Water Protection "� -. .' '.°, '`. l e,;. ; Water Conservation Plan yInk `''° Wellhead Protection ,� v ,� . Recent Conservation Efforts Wellhead protection is a means to safeguard pub- The Cityimplemented a Water Conservation Plan Conservation Strategies for the Future lic supply wells by preventing contaminants from entering the area that contributes water to the well in 2006 through the DNR Water Emergency and An updated Water Conservation Plan is included or wellfield over a period of time. In 2004, the City Conservation Plan (amended in March 2008). The in the 2018 Minnesota Department of Natural Re- completed a Wellhead Protection Plan (WHPP) in plan addressed both conservation on the supply sources (DNR) Water Supply, on file with the City. accordance with Minnesota rules, Chapter side(leak detection and repairs, metering), as well The City plans to continue the water conservation 4720.5200 and updated their plan in 2009. The as on the demand side (reductions in usage). techniques employed over the last ten years and area from which water is supplied to the Citywells annually evaluate and expand them as appropri- ispp Tracking Success identified as the Wellhead Protection Area ate.A meter replacement program is currently un- (WHPA). The area around it, which is to be pro- Results of conservation efforts are measured derway and it is anticipated that all meters will be tected and managed, is defined as the Drinking based on the water demand, water losses, and replaced by 2020. The City employs conservation Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA). peak demand trends. The residential per capita billing strategies for water and rates are evaluated These areas are delineated in the Plan and were per day values, peaking factor, and unaccounted annually. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Water Resources 9-35 APPValley Capital Improvement Plan & Preventa- tive Maintenance The City is committed to capital reinvestment of the Water Utility to achieve the goals and policies set forth and maintain the long-term sustainability of the Utility. A Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is in place to cover expansion (if needed), repair and maintenance of the water system and is updated annually. As discussed in this plan, the capacity of current = T • = - wells, water treatment plant and storage facilities • _ meet the future demands based on the 2040 pop- ulation projections and land use map. If significant changes were to occur, such as the addition of a • Reservoir maintenance: warranty inspection large water user, the water plan and resulting CIP Preventative maintenance is extremely important at two (2) years, touch up repairs at 10 to 12 would need to be updated. in the life of a water supply and distribution sys- years, total reconditioning at 20 to 25 years. The current water treatment plant is meeting all tem. Preventative maintenance is scheduled as Cathodic protection at selected sites—annual state and federal government regulations related follows: check. •to water quality. Although not anticipated, the fu- Production wells pulled every seven (7)years. • Valve, meter, equipment, etc., upgrades and ture planning efforts and CIPs would also need to • Water treatment plant (WTP) high service replacements are budgeted and scheduled as be adjusted if a currently unregulated water con- pumps pulled every eight (8)years. necessary. stituent becomes regulated, existing regulations • Annual inspection — Leak detection on one- become more stringent, or a new contaminant is third of the water system plus on cast iron identified in the wells. pipe, PVC, and overlay areas, etc. Future CIP projects will explore and identify ways • Valve operation program — scheduled as time to improve the water system, such as investigating permits. lower pressure areas and evaluating the benefit of • Semi-annual program (spring and fall) — hy- increasing watermain size during reconstruction drant flushing and inspection program. projects. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12040 Comprehensive Plan Update Water Resources 9-36 APPValley 7/23/2020 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN APPLE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL J U LY 23, 2020 MEETING Apple Valley I. 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REQUEST Approve Resolution Adopting the Apple Valley 2040 Comprehensive Plan APpVallley 1 7/23/2020 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Community Engagement • 2017 and 2018 Home and Garden Expo • Apple Valley Website — Survey and Updates • Stakeholder Meetings • Planning Commission and Park and Recreation Advisory Meetings • Two Open Houses PLAN CONTENTS Vision Identifies Leading Priorities and Principles Desired for the City Through 2040 Community Context Examines the Physical, Demographic,Social,and Economic Characteristics of the City Land Use Provides the Framework for guiding Land Use to Achieve the Vision Housing and Neighborhoods Identifies Housing Needs and Provide a Foundation to Guide development and Redevelopment Economic Development Identifies Economic Development and Redevelopment Opportunities to 2040 Parks and Recreation Provides a Clear Vision that Guides Future Park Development and Redevelopment Decisions Transportation Recognizes Changing Travel Needs and Provide Safe Multimodal Transportation Facilities Water Resources Ensure Wise Water Management Through Sustainable Quantity and Quality Practices 2 VISION 7/23/2020 -hXb APKge Val Wg ' laitigiv.: 1''' ''''WIF . 11. vr..� ir6E ER COMMUNITY CONTEXT Year Population Households Employment 2000* 45,527 16,344 12,106 2010* 49,084 18,875 14,279 2020** 55,500 21,700 15,800 2030** 59,200 23,300 16,400 2040** 63,600 24,900 17,100 EMI .-:•:::::. °` Ie11ey 3 7/23/2020 COMMUINITY CONTEXT ■ a E Ili ■ E II II , / S I! I LLLL 4 COMMUNITY CONTEXT SUSTAINABILITY AND RESILIENCE RECENT EFFORTS • GreenStep City— Recently Achieved Level 4 • Performance Buildings • Efficient Utilities • Water Monitoring and Restoration • Recycling • Energy • Over 150 Sustainable References in the Plan AIDPNIL ey 4 7/23/2020 COMMUNITY CONTEXT IMPLICATIONS FOR 2040 • Community Aging • Increasing Diversity • Jobs-Housing Balance • Housing Affordability • National Retail Trends • Development Opportunities • Technology Trends LAND USE 1211 Nee AMON.se. - - w.yatoes .11 *0 raj 47.7 a11 A y J • CIn Of APPLE VALLB12.0411CC.ip.te ee.FIN 4.111646/ Ne1U 416 5 7/23/2020 LAND USE 11 R...4.1-1.17o30e MM..NM a.20401.r.00•Rat. EAGAN . ..0=-..:.: a..7....: :. 10 _._.------ .. a Illsrulecurd I*C-ornrunev a -' :'..'. • IL.. ...-10'• A - , If a, •1116, a .. N.L. I % .• . . 1 ,1 A ...-•• -.7.. r - - : 2 0 .1 •_. 1 1 I I.' i!. • • ..r _-,- 1 •1 a IN a __.-: .... LAWIEVILLIE ' . 1 CITY OF APPLE VM.LET MO Compretwemm Plan updam ANL LW Um,* DEVELOPMENT PHASING PLAN - Owvalewrnent Ph.. --- R.I..WMIF.0. .--• ii .- . ....' ..," N.M....1 / / i ''—'11: .,...,,,, ...... '.1,%;..,,c•. . i' i ia6, i _.1..; li 1 .. , ; ../". : I ; I• _ C i I I a ;20 .lF i I, -‘ i ROI A dIrflid - 1 CITY IM APFILE VALLEY I 20•10 Cm......M.O.. * Lard L/261.26 "b. 6 7/23/2020 LAND USE Dnwn[nw,,Com., 1 F rF W'R0.P 4nl0 i. -. Cam.- � ♦ P mu. fMSf Wn • 1011 •��•tgNmttlMU A.. I]lWC..tnt.a PYn the, ... APPVealley LAND USE cc cAticEPTuAL LAND USE DIAGRAM 2040 .... 2030• .... • 2020 "re ORCHARD PLACE APPLE VALLEY.MN Kimiey*Han ways,,e1 7 LAND USE GOALS 7/23/2020 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT • Direct development to meet needs of the City's residents and workforce. • Minimize land use conflicts to maintain the functional integrity of distinct uses and individual property values. • Ensure a community with strong,cohesive, identifiable neighborhoods. • Ensure that the land use plan connects residents to jobs and services. • Attract and retain businesses that provide head-of-household wages. • Support a vibrant,successful Downtown as the primary shopping, service,and activity center. REHABILITATION AND DEVELOPMENT • Provide a flexible framework to encourage property maintenance, infill redevelopment and adaptive reuse. LAND USE GOALS TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT • Use "suburban-intensive"transit-oriented development to increase appropriate housing opportunities and support a compatible mix of uses • Encourage downtown development and redevelopment to enhance walking and bicycling • Manage parking supply to reduce the amount of unused surface parking INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS • Maintain a cooperative relationship with other governmental, quasi-governmental, and other non-profit organizations ENERGY • Seek to minimize energy waste and increase the role of renewables in the public and private sectors 8 7/23/2020 HOUSING AND NEIGHBORHOODS — r rww e:nw.an..�wwrw�o I .+ Cat CR APPLE 44.al I 2611)Cw*0Y11►.. Moi.1.21 HOUSING AND NEIGHBORHOODS HOUSING GOALS • Work with the Metropolitan Council, the Dakota County Community Development Agency, builders and other involved parties to provide a fair share of the region's affordable housing. • Use the Comprehensive Plan and other resources to address community housing needs. • Encourage a supply of housing styles and sizes that lets people of all ages continue to live in Apple Valley; the supply should adapt to future changes in demographics and meet local labor force needs. • Continue to encourage a high standard of property maintenance. APPVa lleylley 9 7/23/2020 HOUSING AND NEIGHBORHOODS HOUSING GOALS • Promote quality housing developments that respect the natural environment and resident health. • Promote a high level of safety and security for people living in all types of housing. • Reduce greenhouse gas emissions from residences by encouraging wider adoption of renewable resources by utility companies. • Encourage individual homeowners and owners of rental housing to increase energy independence and to minimize energy consumption and waste. APPValley HOUSING AND NEIGHBORHOODS AFFORDABLE HOUSING NEED ALLOCATION FOR APPLE VALLEY At or below 30%AMI 221 31 to 50%AMI 118 51 to 80%AMI 129 Total Units 10 7/23/2020 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT111 STRATEGIC PLAN • Attract large employers to the Mixed Business Campus area • Invest in the Downtown quadrants • Make the superblocks in the Downtown quadrants more accessible and offer ease of movement for vehicles, bikes and pedestrians • Develop regional, national and global connections • Support and develop well educated and trained workers that match job availability and next generation job growth • Develop economic resilience that adapts to trends in business climate and the unknown natural disasters that could affect City and business services and operations. Apple.,ey ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT A Ineanthin private Invet6Mrrt Pra;•cto Ynbl oppurtunn4n foe development and ndawkPmnt ProvJde tonnrthve iaqua,.clure to support economic activity Prepare update master pltrra for rprciOrr Plate and Pv,Moan Pefnr supportive od cascen and prudriines to lard use.dellgn,and economic development Evaluate Assent rninket Panda kcal data,aunlcipat resources.and devNopmant oppnrtundrn Coordinate Peuekp soil capital,build partnenhips Mut regional developer,buslrressrs and mNdul orns 11 7/23/2020 PARKS AND RECREATION AM 1 OMNI NM = ar u • S. aal nr.w ey1 Vag rr.� — . ..▪.ti 1.! r -iill + ==• • �, -j' 311 --� t _.. _.. A i h▪ � l w ▪ " i 1 • M cm'OE aFRE:uuEvlm+ocaweaea»E w+uoale4.1 ▪ PIM am 141,101m1+ PARKS AND RECREATION TJ �� -- ii . Ripka.nal ilmo�' Jam;ANII- III :4�� _ - I ... - $ P'-- lik _ li . OW --' ND . 1130111Ltilifillbledfr; 4/411 ;CI it r- 1 —11 CITY OF/RE'.ALLEY 12010 COM-Medlin Plan 140W Pyles aM Ronson 7d 12 7/23/2020 PARKS AND RECREATION -0 PARKS IMPROVEMENT STRATEGY • Create parks that provide people with places to gather and play. • Distribute parks throughout the City • Connect parks and neighborhoods with sidewalks and trails • Match facilities with the full spectrum of ages, abilities and economic status. Creating a system that serves all residents • Provide a wide range of indoor and outdoor recreation facilities • Collaborate with other parties to coordinate the delivery of services to make effective use of financial resources APPValley PARKS AND RECREATION PARKS IMPROVEMENT STRATEGY • Use parks as a tool to control flooding, help preserve the quality of the surface water, replenish the groundwater supply, reduce air pollution and preserve natural resources • Effectively provide information to residents and visitors that will elevate awareness of the park and recreation system and services • Develop a park and recreation system that is innovative • Grow trail and sidewalk connections with park improvements, new development and redevelopment APPValley 13 7/23/2020 TRANSPORTATION ./ m -,I f ..,1 1. %,rt 9 �;h. . Milk .I� gAMAM , ti lif _ l�- .�a;� F�EW�� conk aAnuoi ..IN QP(isLIIAIM1TM.:rti•git"VaP rl�.a �� •A;_, • er OTT OF.POLE VALLEY J2F.AC..p.nw.Pon LW. * Tr.noanecn84 EXISTING FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION rA _ (74641 f 1�J ,„,er„._ ., ,.. ., ........„.....1 kr,.......m.„,.... ..... 0 a . „.„,g, ..,....., . irr_,,,...,,., .,....., ....., ,...,....; IDE,:itllim''imdIMNtwitfME .6.......... .•• p.110.-..=.11.,rip,, eel uu++w :,110.0...R.IM.. + H 14 7/23/2020 TRANSPORTATION /....7; I .- • • • - LaMar • - 1114. i- .�:.,IEv�Agfmltl�shAn Lb]Y! 61A TRANSPORTATION • • • • Ucend O � 11�Ca4PMG0 Urq WMl�MMIYw � �. aPF; • 1 15 7/23/2020 TRANSPORTATION alij ��11� r Mninigavoktlarriffol cir m 4020 No ig.:..m.1.- fil VIllivinignirliters ,..-.. rlafai�I s-voigiell . 7� � all3a�' r IL_L.L:.ert LEXEVILE 2040 Cae■.drw Pin Min am TRANSPORTATION L G.r .Cur 4rbnt Bus Stop Locations IDi t _ .E �. A • • • • • 0PMas111Mix a L. e...Aa . sir-- • Ld . Ert.OP.CPLE EEL.'IA.000 RLM.. n 16 7/23/2020 TRANSPORTATION he.apYiay M• I r rq fl rr' 5 H Q 5 DOwiiOwR • FOCUS AREA ia.nrpeu fl . nr ORCHARD PUKE 3160 r LiUPM1e TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION GOALS • Continue to establish and maintain an interconnected affordable network of roadways, transit service, bicycle trails and pedestrian facilities between neighborhoods, recreational and community facilities, commercial centers, and metropolitan region • Integrate and achieve a balanced mix of all transportation modes • Improve the functionality and safety of the transportation system as a whole • Work with local entities to continue to enhance transit usage in Apple Valley • Ensure the Apple Valley transportation system is resilient, sustainable, and able to evolve with societal advancements and changes, safeguarding investments for many years to come 17 7/23/2020 WATER RESOURCES SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT GOALS • Manage the risk of flooding to minimize adverse effects to life, property, and infrastructure • Manage surface water resources to promote healthy ecosystems, preserve water quality, and meet applicable water quality standards • Manage storm water runoff to reduce negative impacts to water resources and infrastructure • Protect, restore, and enhance wetlands and natural areas • Protect the quality and quantity of groundwater • Protect water and natural resources through responsible management of development and redevelopment activities • Promote stewardship of water and environmental resources through Apple education, public involvement, and cooperation Valley WATER RESOURCES k'—.�.. I .._a.._ lx sancta s' f I I^�J sews y I.C{ rf system - _ .--1 x E.nvn SyMCm n'' ---- 5T''''' 1 ' .—.. t -----,. ",- — ff ,,'.=';-, 18 7/23/2020 WATER RESOURCES ; �, `�1� ..p — Vie;. �v� .r p 4 ri'"'s }. ,, ! wwa• ..�.e. , 7-\__r r-- N' . , & 1 .._. Water '.7 t)islnbution l i )-r System r r Y Eaau9 nd Future 1 __V 17 System \ j( f Wa[h Ma n wSizes .f: ith �_. L'�L� 1 1 5r ■1 i Apple —} Valley WATER RESOURCES WATER STRATEGY • Emergency Response Plan • Source Water Protection • Water Conservation Plan • Capital Improvement Plan • Preventative Maintenance AppValley 19 7/23/2020 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RECOMMENDED ACTION Approve the resolution adopting the apple valley 2040 Comprehensive Plan Apple Valley 20 • ITEM: 5.C. ..... :�. Apple COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 23, 2020 Valley SECTION: Regular Agenda Description: The Shores Staff Contact: Department/ Division: Thomas Lovelace, City Planner Community Development Department Applicant: Project Number: Pulte Group, Inc. PC18-16-PZCSB Applicant Date: 11/28/2018 60 Days: 120 Days: ACTION REQUESTED: 1. Pass an ordinance rezoning 9.9 acres of property from "SG" (Sand and Gravel) to "M- 6C" (Multiple Family Residential/6-12 Units Per Acre). 2. Adopt a resolution approving The Shores subdivision preliminary plat. 3. Adopt a resolution approving a conditional use permit to allow for construction of townhomes with exposed exterior finish materials other than those provided under Section 155.346 of the City Code. 4. Adopt a resolution authorizing the conveyance of 9.9 acres of land located in the northeast corner of 157th Street West and Johnny Cake Ridge Road. 5. Approve the agreement with Pulte Homes of Minnesota, LLC, for the private installation of public infrastructure for Project 2018-170, The Shores. SUMMARY: The applicant is requesting the following: 1. A rezoning of 9.9 acres of property from "SG" (Sand and Gravel) to "M-6C" (Medium Density Residential/6-12 units per acre). 2. The subdivision of 9.9 acres into 101 residential townhome lots and eleven (11) outlots. 3. A conditional use permit (C.U.P.) to allow for townhome construction with exposed finish materials other than those provided under section 155.346 of the City Code. 4. Approval of the conveyance of 9.9 acres of land. 5. Approval of the agreement with Pulte Homes of Minnesota, LLC, for the private installation of public infrastructure for Project 2018-170, The Shores. The applicant submitted a proposal requesting the subdivision of 9.9 acres into 101 lots and thirteen (13) outlots. Outlots A through D will be used for private streets within the townhome development, and Outlots E through M will be devoted for common open space. An easement over a portion of Outlot K is proposed to be dedicated to the City for public park purposes and will be the location of a public trail. Staff requested and the Planning Commission concurred that Outlot L be incorporated into the Outlots G, H, and I and Outlot M should be incorporated into Outlot K prior to final plat approval. A conditional use permit (C.U.P.) has been approved for the "SG" zoned property within the proposed development, which allows sand and gravel mining. Approval of the proposed development project will end the ability to mine the property. Therefore, the property owner will need to release the sand and gravel mining C.U.P. on a 9.9-acre site and remove the property from the Sand and Gravel Overlay designation on the 2040 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. This should be completed prior to final plat approval. Staff will work with the developer and property owner with the amendment of the C.U.P. and removal of the Sand and Gravel Overlay. Mining operations will continue north of the proposed development, which could result in potential conflicts. This will need to be addressed through the zoning code regulations that establish setbacks between residential property and mining operations, operating hours, and screening. A public hearing for the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map amendment, rezoning, subdivision and conditional use permit requests was held on December 5, 2018. The hearing was opened, comments taken, and the hearing was closed. The Commission considered the development request on January 16, 2019 and voted 7-0 to recommend approval of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map amendment, rezoning, conditional use permit, subdivision, and site plan/building permit authorization. The draft ordinance, conditional use permit, and subdivision resolutions reflect the Commission and staffs recommendation. The proposed amendment was added to the draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. Approval of the City's 2040 Comprehensive Plan will negate the need for consideration of the amendment by the City Council. Also, added for City Council consideration, are requests for approval of a resolution allowing for the conveyance of the 9.9 acre site by Rockport, LLC to Pulte Homes of Minnesota, LLC prior to final plat approval, and approval of an agreement with Pulte Homes of Minnesota, LLC to allow for the private installation of public infrastructure to serve the proposed development. The reason for the proposed conveyance to Pulte is to allow for the sale and closing of the development site after preliminary plat approval and before the final plat is recorded. Approval of the private installation agreement allows the developer to install the City designed public infrastructure. The scope of public infrastructure to be installed per the private installation agreement will include sanitary sewer and services and water main and services. All costs associated with the infrastructure installation would be funded by Pulte Homes of Minnesota, LLC, per the attached installation agreement. BACKGROUND: Comprehensive Plan Amendment: The 2030 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designated approximately 11 acres of property in the area of the townhome site "LD" (Low Density Residential/2-6 units per acre) and 29 acres "HD" (High Density Residential/12+ units per acre). The proposed 2040 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map initially designated the whole site "HD". As part of their application, the applicant requested the re-designation of approximately 2.5 acres of the existing "LD" area and 7.4 acres of the "HD" area to "MD" (Medium Density Residential/6-12 units per acre). During the final review of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, minor modifications were made to the land use map that included re-designating the 9.9 acres to "MD". The City Council is tentatively scheduled to consider the approval of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan at their July 23 meeting. If approved, the need for the land use map approval as originally proposed will not be necessary. The proposed 101-unit townhome development will have a density of 10.2 units per acre, which would exceed the maximum units per acre allowed in the "LD" designation and would be below the minimum in the "HD" designation. Medium Density Residential land uses includes townhomes, other attached single-family dwellings, low-rise apartments, and condominiums at densities that range between six and twelve units per acre. This designation fits with the "M-4", "M-5", "M-6" multi-family zoning districts, and some "PD" (Planned Development) zoning districts. There is some concern with how this proposed amendment and development will impact the adjacent property that will not be re-designated. The applicant has provided a plan that shows the property to the north, up to 155th Street West, as being developed as townhomes in the future. The property is in the Temporary Sand and Gravel Overlay district. The Sand and Gravel Overlay is a temporary land use designation that allows mining activity on properly zoned property in conformance with an approved conditional use permit. The overlay designation states that sand and gravel mining is considered an interim use and that properties currently being mined will eventually be redeveloped in conformance with the underlying land use designation. This designation will be removed as part of the Comprehensive Plan amendment. Rezoning: The applicant is requesting a rezoning of the property from "SG" (Sand and Gravel) to "M-6" (Multiple Family Residential/6-12 units per acre. The "M-6" districts are intended for those areas which are designated for "medium density" in the comprehensive guide plan, where a moderately high density of townhouse or apartinnent dwelling units is expected. Property within these districts are characterized by relatively level topography, the minimal presence of significant mature vegetation and proximity to either neighborhood or community collector roads or to arterial roads. The subject property meets all the characteristics of the "M-6" zoning district. Townhouse dwellings are a permitted use with the "M-6" zoning district as long as no building contains in excess of 12 dwelling units. The proposed development will have fourteen 4-unit, three 4-unit, and five 6-unit buildings. The zoning code also has three different zoning designations, "A", "B" and "C", which identifies building setbacks, height, number of stories and maximum impervious surface. The applicant has requested a "C" zoning classification for their development, which allows for least restrictive setbacks. For example, building setbacks along 157th Street West is 75 feet in the "A" designation, 50 feet in the "B" and 40 feet in the "C". Conditional Use Permit: Section 155.346 of the zoning code states that "Multiple residential buildings adjacent to "R" zones or occupied "M" zones shall have a vertical exposed exterior finish consisting of at least 50% non-combustible, non-degradable and maintenance-free construction materials (such as face brick or natural stone but excluding such construction materials as sheet aluminum, iron or concrete block of any kind or similar), with the balance being a non-manufactured natural construction material such as plank cedar or redwood". The applicant is proposing an exterior finish consisting of vinyl siding, with one-third of the units having cultured stone accents, which not in conformance with section 155.346. However, section 155.078 (C) of the ordinance does allow apartment or townhouse dwelling units constructed with exposed vertical exterior finish materials other than those provided under section 155.346 as a conditional use when: 1. The proposed materials represent the same or similar materials used on at least 66.7% and of the existing buildings within 350 feet of the site. 2. The proposed materials are demonstrated to be of comparable grade and quality as those otherwise required. 3. The materials have the appearance of wood siding having a maximum plank width of 12 inches. Under no circumstance shall sheet or corrugated aluminum, iron, steel, asbestos, sheet plywood or similar materials be used which have no three-dimensional relief, nor shall plain or painted plain concrete block be used. Any decorative concrete block shall be colored only by means of a pigment impregnated throughout the entire block. Preliminary Plat: The applicant has submitted preliminary plat that shows the subdivision of 9.9 acres into 101 lots and thirteen (13) outlots. The outlots will be used for common open space, utilities, private streets and guest parking areas to serve the proposed townhouse development. Outlot L should be combined with Outlot G, H, and/or J and Outlot M should be incorporated into Outlot K. Drainage and utility easements should be established over and across al of the outlots. The applicant will be required to dedicate one foot (1') wide easements which restrict direct driveway access to all city streets abutting the plat except at locations approved by the City. Livable Communities Impact: The proposal will add 101 market-rate townhomes to the City's existing housing stock, which is consistent with the Livable Communities Act. Site Plan: The site plan indicates the construction of fourteen 4-unit, three 5-unit, and five 6- unit townhouse buildings on approximately 9.9 acres. The net density for this project will be 10.2 dwelling units per acre. The applicant is proposing to develop the site in two phases, with the east 45 units in the first phase and remaining 56 units in the second phase. The dwelling units within the site will be served by private streets. One of the streets will intersect with 157th Street West in the southeast corner of the site and Johnny Cake Ridge Road in the northwest corner. This street will be aligned with Evendale Avenue to the south and will provide a full complement of turning movements in and out of the development. The Johnny Cake Ridge Road intersection will be a right in/right out intersection only. This street will also extend to the north and will terminate at the property line. It is expected that this street will extend in the future into the property north of the site. A temporary "hammerhead" turnaround will be constructed until such time that it is extended to the north. City code requires a minimum of one and one-half parking spaces, and two garage spaces per townhouse dwelling unit. Each dwelling unit will have a minimum two-car garage and a driveway that should be able to accommodate parking of two vehicles. Fifty-one (51) guest parking spaces are proposed for the development, which meets the minimum required rate of 1/2-space per unit. The site plan indicates that these spaces will be nine feet wide and 20 feet long, which meets city requirements. The proposed development will meet all building setbacks with the exception of the setback along the north property line. The plan indicates a 15-foot setback at that location for the buildings located in Blocks 9, 16, and 17. The minimum required side or rear yard setback in the "C" district is 25 feet. The applicant has indicated that they will be the likely developer of the property to the north, which may bring the three blocks into conformance. However, that is not guaranteed, therefore, the units should meet all minimum setbacks. Street Classifications/Accesses/Circulation: The 9.9-acre townhome site is bordered by Johnny Cake Ridge Road to the west and 157th Street West to the south. Johnny Cake Ridge Road is classified as a major collector street and 157th Street West is classified as a minor collector. No direct vehicle access from the individual units in this development onto Johnny Cake Ridge Road and 157th Street West is proposed. Private streets and drives will provide vehicular access to dwelling units and circulation within the development. All the private streets/drives have been designed to provide adequate flow of vehicular traffic throughout the project area. Vehicle access from this residential project to a public street will be via right in/right out intersections along the east side of Johnny Cake Road, and a full intersection along the north side of 157th Street West. The project is proposed to be completed in two phases. The first phase will include the construction of 45 units on Blocks 13 through 22. A temporary hammerhead turnaround will be constructed at the north end of Road B as part of the first phase. A second temporary turnaround should also constructed at the west end of Road B in the first phase. Road B will extend to Johnny Cake Ridge Road as part of the second phase development. That intersection will only allow for right turns in and right turns out from the development. Pedestrian Access: The applicant is proposing a network of internal sidewalks with connections to pathways/sidewalks adjacent to future Johnny Cake Ridge Road and 157th Street West. The sidewalk between Block 20 and 21 should be extended to 157th Street West. A sidewalk connection should also be made from the building on Lot 4, Block 19 to the sidewalk along the east side of Road A. The applicant is also proposing to construct a 12-foot wide trail along the east edge of the property that will connect to the existing trail along 157th Street West and will extend north into Outlot L. Initially the plan showed that individual units in Blocks 17, 18, and 19 would be connected to the trail as well as a sidewalk connection between Blocks 18 and 19. The applicant has indicated that the trail will be constructed as part of their park dedication requirements. If it is dedicated as a public trail, the City will not allow sidewalks from the dwelling units to connect to the trail. They added a sidewalk that will be just west of the trail that will provide access from those units and to the trail. The new sidewalk should be extended and make a connection to the proposed sidewalk along the east side of Road A. Grading and Utilities Plan: Grading and utility have been reviewed by the City Engineer and his comments are included in the attached memos. A storm water ponding area for this development will be located to the east the site in Outlot A of the Orchard Place development. Completion of the grading and acceptance of the storm water pond by the City will be required prior to City Council approval of the final plat. Elevation Drawings: The applicant is proposing an exterior finish that will consist of vinyl lap siding, which is not an approved exterior finish unless by conditional use. A conditional use permit application has been submitted for consideration by the City. Please refer to an attachment for additional information on the exterior finish of the buildings. Landscape Plan: The Natural Resources Coordinator has reviewed the preliminary landscape plans and had the following comments: 1. All evergreen trees shall be at least 15'-20' behind the trail or sidewalk connections to Johnny Cake Ridge Road and 157th Street to minimize future visibility and branch conflicts. 2. Ensure all other trees are planted a minimum of 15' from buildings and garages to allow for full growth with minimal pruning. 3. Ornamental tree species are proposed in between every driveway. There will likely be future visibility/sightline issues and nuisance branches as they mature. More narrow or slender tree species, shrubs, or other perennial plantings are recommended instead. Underground utilities may also be an issue with limited space to plant in these small spaces. 4. Trees would likely live longer lives in the open green spaces around the buildings or in "front yards". 5. There are very few trees located along the northern and eastern property edges, some trees could be shifted to provide additional screening. 6. No major tree plantings shall be located over any underground utilities or within easements. If plantings are shown over underground utilities or within easements, the owner should have the expectation that plantings will be removed for access when needed. 7. Clarify the intention of the note stating, "A 15 foot landscape buffer shall be provided along all public roads" on sheet 17. 8. Incorporation of additional native plants into the planting plan in place of cultivars and native cultivars will have additional water quality and pollinator habitat benefits. 9. Landscaping at the NE corner of 157th and Johnny Cake will need to be relocated out of drainage and utility easements and be clear of any future traffic signal components. Her comments are contained in the City Engineer's memo. Revisions should be made to the plan per her comments. The Coordinator also reviewed the proposed foundation planting and commented that the plan will provide the standard mix of shrubs and perennials that will do well. A revised landscape plan showed approximately 74 trees being removed from the original landscape plan, predominantly from between each driveway location (62 less ornamental trees and 12 fewer conifers). The overall site contains adequate space for these trees to be relocated to front yard locations and along the northern and eastern boundaries. Staff is recommending that the applicant provide additional landscaping as recommended in the attached memo dated January 16, 2019. Recreation Issues: The City's subdivision regulations provide for dedication of land or easements for the purpose of offsetting the need created by new development for new parks or storm water holding ponds. The regulations also provide for a cash-in-lieu of land dedication and is based on a "benchmark" land valuation for raw land. The applicant has indicated that the park dedication for the proposed townhome development will be satisfied by the dedication of Outlot K, trail construction in the outlot, and park dedication fees. This proposed park dedication request was presented to the Apple Valley Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee at their December meeting. Parks and Recreation Department staff and the Committee concluded that they would accept the easement and trail as part of the development's park dedication requirements and accept the remainder as cash- in-lieu of land dedication at the current requirements set forth in the City's 2019 fee schedule. Public Hearing Comments: A public hearing for the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map amendment, rezoning, subdivision and conditional use permit requests was held by the Planning Commission on December 5, 2018. The hearing was opened, comments taken, and the hearing was closed. The following is a synopsis of the comments received at those public hearings, followed by any staff comments as appropriate. A question was raised about allowing rentals. Response - Mr. Paul Heuer, Pulte Group representative, stated that rentals would likely be allowed. A homeowners association (HOA) would be created upfront and all property owners would become part of that association and would address rentals. A comment was received regarding height of the buildings. It was asked if there would be a basement option where you do not have to go as tall as the similar type of townhome units in Cobblestone Lake. Response - Mr. Heuer said they will go with straight zoning with this application and meet the requirements of the rooflines and lower the building. Related to the concern of grades, he said they will be following the same grades as those of 157th Street and Johnny Cake Ridge Road. There is not massive hill. This is a mine so they get to create the grades. They will not create steep grades in a townhome development to make it difficult. There is a reason to believe level grade throughout. A resident who lives across the street in the corner looking toward this development was concerned about the proposed land use changes as he was told that across from them would be single-family homes. Response - The property located directly east of the Quarry Pond Fourth Addition single-family development is currently designated "LD" (Low Density Residential). A variety of housing types can be built in "LD" areas including single- family detached dwellings, duplexes, twin homes, townhomes and other types of attached housing at a density of 2-6 units per acre. The 101 townhomes will be built on 9.9 acres and will have a density of 10.2 units per acre. The approximately 2.5 acres currently designated "LD" will have 23 units, with the remaining 78 units on property currently designated "HD" (High Density Residential/12+ units per acre). If the current designation was to remain, this 9.9-acre site could have a density of 94-193 units per acre. Therefore, it appears that the re-designation of the property to "MD" (Medium Density Residential/6-12 units per acre) and the proposed development will be slightly higher than the minimum currently allowed and significantly lower than the maximum. A question was raised about how the school district would be impacted with changing of this density. Response - School District #196 estimates that a townhouse will have approximately .265 students per unit. They break that number down further and estimate that there will be .123 elementary, .055 middle school and .074 high school students per unit. Therefore, this proposed development would generate 12 elementary, 6 middle school, and 8 high school students. These would be estimates that the school district would use for their planning purposes, and these numbers may vary when other factors are taken into consideration. Also, the school district was provided notice of the proposed Comp Plan amendment for review and comment. The district did not provide comments to the proposed changes. A resident inquired, that from a marketing standpoint, who they are aiming for their sales and what the price range would be. Response - Mr. Heuer stated that the homes would range from $290,000 to $330,000. The median sales price for homes in Apple Valley range from $256,000 to $265,500, with new homes sale prices in the low to mid$300,000 range. A resident asked if parking would be allowed on 157th Street West and if the public using Quarry Point Park would be allowed to park along the streets in the proposed development. Response - 157th Street West is a minor collector street and parking is currently not allowed on the street. The City does not have any plans to remove the parking restriction as part of this development. The streets within the proposed development will be private and under control of the owners of the townhomes. In most cases, townhomes development limit parking to residents and guests only. Also, the design of the street will not allow for on-street parking. The only parking available will be at each residence and the guest parking spaces scattered throughout the development. BUDGET IMPACT: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Background Material Memo Background Material Memo Ordinance Resolution Resolution Resolution Map Agreement Location Map Comp Plan Map Comp Plan Map Zoning Map Zoning Map Preliminary Plat Site Plan Grading Plan Utilities Plan Elevations Background Material Site Plan Presentation Pulte. "THE SHORES" APPLICATION FOR: Comp Plan Amendment, Preliminary Plat, Rezoning, Site Plan Review APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA March 6, 2020 Introduction Pulte Homes of Minnesota, LLC ("Pulte") is pleased to be submitting this application. Pulte's company vision is "Building Consumer Inspired Homes and Communities to Make Lives Better". We are a large homebuilder and we currently operate under three distinct brands of homebuilding throughout the country: Pulte Homes, Centex Homes, and Del Webb. Pulte's Minnesota Division has an office in Eden Prairie and will sell over 600 homes in the Twin Cities this year under the Pulte Homes and Del Webb brands. Pulte will act as both developer of the property and builder of the homes within this new neighborhood. The primary contact for Pulte is: Paul Heuer, Director of Land Planning & Entitlement 7500 Flying Cloud Drive, Suite 670 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 (contact info provided to City staff) The owner of the property is: Rockport LLC 14698 Galaxie Avenue Apple Valley, MN 55124 Property Legal Descriptions & Addresses Legal Description: The North '/2 of the Southeast IA of Section 35, Township 115, Range 20, Dakota County, Minnesota, except that part platted as REGENTS POINT and also excepting those parts platted as QUARRY PONDS FOURTH ADDITION and QUARRY PONDS FIFTH ADDITION. Address: 15497 Pilot Knob Road Apple Valley, MN 55124 the first intersection is powerful and delivers a message of quality and attention to detail. In addition, placing amenities at this location (discussed in the next section) increases social interaction since cars driving into the neighborhood will see neighbors who are using the amenities. 3. Private amenities -A key part of creating new neighborhoods is understanding our customers and anticipating their desires. This property is fortunate to have a very strong location surrounded by a variety of recreational, retail, and convenience-oriented amenities. Increasingly we are finding that our buyers would like social gathering areas within their neighborhoods. This is an important priority for many of our customers, and the size of this neighborhood is large enough to economically sustain such an amenity. Additional market research is necessary, but we are considering constructing a private tot lot and fire pit gathering area that will be owned and maintained by the neighborhood homeowner's association. 4. Pedestrian connectivity —A Dakota County regional trail is planned just to the east of the Shores which utilizes a tunnel beneath 157th Street West. In addition, there are sidewalks along both sides of 157th Street West, guiding pedestrians from the Shores to Quarry Point Park, the park and ride, and retail establishments to the east. A trail is planned along Johnny Cake Ridge Road as well. Within the neighborhood, we have designed a pedestrian system that conveniently connects to internal private amenities and the perimeter trail and sidewalk systems. This neighborhood is thoroughly integrated into the perimeter pedestrian systems. The applications included in this submittal pertain only to the area containing the 101 homes. However, we have also prepared and submitted a larger"ghost plat"for additional property which shows how this neighborhood could logically be expanded to the north in the future. History of Application We first met with City staff about this application on February 12, 2018. We submitted a Sketch Plan application for this property in early 2018 and it went before the Planning Commission on June 20, 2018. Feedback was positive. We subsequently made minor revisions to the neighborhood layout to conform with City ordinances and to respond to City staff comments: 1. Perimeter setbacks were increased 2. Some internal dimensions were increased 3. Access to future Johnny Cake Ridge Road was moved slightly north We worked through issues with City staff and completed the following steps: Nov 7, 2018 - submitted a preliminary plat application Jan 3, 2019 - Park and Recreation Advisory Committee reviewed Jan 16, 2019— Planning Commission reviewed Unfortunately, at that point in time the Metropolitan Council altered their approach to reviewing the City's updated Comprehensive Plan and refused to review our Comprehensive Plan 3 The current property is being mined under a Conditional Use Permit. Over the past two years of delay for this application, the landowner completed grading for the new neighborhood and has relocated a berm from immediately north of 157 Street West to immediately north of the new neighborhood. This will result in both compliance with the existing CUP as well as providing adequate screening/buffering between the land uses. Our Homes Pulte Homes is known for the extraordinary steps that we take to ensure that we are designing and building homes that meet the needs and desires of home buyers. We continually reach out to the public and Pulte homeowners to get feedback to improve our home designs. We call this Life Tested®. The Shores will have versatile 3-story rowhomes, which will provide association-maintained lawn, snow removal, and building exterior maintenance. This type of home appeals to many singles, first-time home buying couples, young families, and even some empty nesters. We anticipate the townhome prices to range from the high $200k's to the mid $300k's. Architecture Background For a variety of reasons, very few townhomes were built after the real estate crash began in 2007. In recent years, Pulte and other builders have gradually ventured back into the townhome market. Given the long time span since rowhomes in had been built, the market environment has changed significantly, including the tastes and needs of the buying public. In response, Pulte has completed in-depth consumer surveys and designed what could be considered "version 2.0"for rowhomes. "Version 1.0" Rowhome Architecture One of the original primary drivers of sales for rowhomes is that it expands the range of consumers who can afford home ownership. In "version 1.0", this was typically accomplished by having identical floor plans and many exterior units being identical in appearance. A common theme was that some or most of the units within a building would have the same exterior elevation. Another common theme was to have the same color scheme or two alternating color schemes for all individual units. "Version 2.0" Rowhome Architecture With Pulte's version 2.0, our goal is to maintain some level of price attainability, but to improve on the historical rowhome architectural themes. Our overall approach is to "individualize and stylize" each unit. The result is individual units which differ in architecture from all other units within the same building and which vary in color scheme from most homes within the neighborhood. This is a significant advancement in the approach to rowhome architecture. Our new rowhome incorporates the following individualizing features: a) Significant number of and varying orientation of windows providing interest to the exterior and transparency and daylighting on the interior 5 Phasing & Schedule The following preliminary schedule for development is envisioned based on current information: Spring 2020 Preliminary plat approval Summer/Fall 2020 Development of Phase 1 Fall/Winter 2020/2021 Open model home and begin sales 2021 Development of Phase 2 2023-2024 Full build out See attached Phasing Plan for a graphic representation. This submittal includes: • This narrative • Application • Escrow agreement • Application fee totaling $2,253 and escrow totaling$3,063.74; Total= $5,316.74 a Mailing labels • Preliminary Plat package—plat, engineering, landscape architecture • Preliminary Plat—graphic rendering • Architectural package • Phasing plan 7 :.. •:..• ... . CITY OF Apple„ ValleyMEMO Public Works TO: Tom Lovelace, Planner FROM: Brandon S. Anderson, PE, City Engineer DATE: January 16, 2019 SUBJECT: The Shores (Pulte) at 157th Street and Johnny Cake Ridge Road. General 1. Provide a narrative and site plan showing how the expansion will be constructed and any impacts prior to building permit authorization. The narrative and plan shall include the following: a. Material storage and staging i. All material storage to be onsite and indicated on plan. b. Haul routes to and from the site. c. Contractor and subcontractor parking locations i. Onsite trade parking should be provided. 2. All work and infrastructure within public easements or right of way shall be to City standards. A public improvement project will be required for sanitary sewer and water main as well as Johnny Cake Ridge Road and 155th Street. 3. A design agreement will be required for the design of the public utilities by City Staff. 4. Funding of all residential streets and base utilities is expected to be the responsibility of the developer. Funding for collector streets and trunk utilities will be included as part of the development agreement and will be shared with the City of Apple Valley. 5. Funding of designated turn lanes at the access points off Johnny Cake Ridge Road is expected to be the responsibility of the developer. 6. Access Restriction Easement will be required along Johnny Cake Ridge Road, 155th and 157th Streets as part of the Development Agreement in accordance with access spacing guidelines set by City Engineer. 7. Preliminary Plat should include required drainage and utility easements. 8. The area that includes the storm water ponds shall be dedicated as a separate Outlot and dedicated to the City. The proposed easement should be shown with the proposed grading to verify that the easement encompasses all the proposed improvements. 9. As stated in the Preliminary Plat Application Narrative dated November 7, 2018 (received November 19, 2018), sanitary sewer and water main extended through the neighborhood will be publicly owned and maintained within drainage and utility easements. Storm sewer constructed within the neighborhood will be privately owned and maintained by the homeowner's association. Permits 10. A Minnesota Pollution Control Agency(MPCA)National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)permit is required for any project that disturbs more than one acre. Provide a copy of the executed permit prior to construction. 11. A City of Apple Valley Natural Resource Management Permit(NRMP)will be required prior to any land disturbing activity. 12. Provide a copy of any other required permits. 13. The City of Apple Valley will procure a sanitary sewer extension permit from the MPCA and an approval from the Minnesota Department of Health for public water main as part of public improvement project associated with public sanitary sewer and water main extension. Site/Traffic 14. Site plan should show site line triangles at access entrances as well as on the landscape plan. The site triangles should be shown according to the guidelines described in section 5- 2.02: Intersection Sight Distance of the MN DOT Road Design Manual.Note that 157th Street at the intersection of Road A is a 40-mph roadway. Johnny Cake Ridge Road north of 157th Street is anticipated to be a 40-mph roadway. 15. As stated in the Preliminary Plat Application Narrative dated November 7, 2018 (received November 19, 2018), internal streets will be designed to standard private street requirements and will be privately owned and maintained by the homeowner's association. 16. Temporary Cul-de-Sac or hammerhead will be required at phasing line as part of Road B. 17. The development as proposed(101 townhomes in) results in 723 trips daily in and out of the development. Total of 60 trips during the peak hour(PM). a. Additionally, the Quarry Ponds development to the west(61 single family homes) results in 660 trips daily. The traffic volume as part of development of 101 units would not be anticipated to meet any warrants for a traffic control change from an all-way stop at Johnny Cake Ridge Road and 157th Street at this time. A Traffic signal is still anticipated at 157th and Johnny Cake Ridge Road and Johnny Cake Ridge Road and 160th Street(CSAH 46) in the future. 18. A northbound right lane at the right-in/right-out on Johnny Cake Ridge Road will need to be constructed with this development. a. The proposed Right-in/Right-out(RIRO) on Johnny Cake Ridge Road north of 157th Street shall be Per Design of Turn Lane Guidelines, the right turn lane should be 1:10 taper(110')plus 205' full turn lane= 315' 19. Proposed full access on 155th Street: a. Access spacing would indicate that the next full access be spaced at 1/8 mile (660 ft.)per access management guidelines b. Based on Pilot Knob Road and the pond locations, recommend accesses on 155th Street at the locations identified in the sketch plan review. c. Per Design of Turn Lane Guidelines (assumes up to 40 mph on 155th): i. The eastbound right turn lane should be 1:10 taper(110')plus 130' full turn lane=240' ii. The westbound left turn lane should be 1:10 taper(110')plus 165' full turn lane=275' 20. Indicate the design speed of the proposed private roads. Some of the proposed vertical curves appear to be below the minimum vertical curve length for a 20-mph roadway per MN DOT standards. 21. An additional sidewalk connection should be made from Lot 4, Block 19 building to road A sidewalk. 22. Final site plan shall be reviewed with the construction plans and approved by City Engineer. Grading,Drainage, and Erosion Control 23. See supplemental comments regarding offsite drainage. 24. Additional Berms and screening is required for lots adjacent to a major collector roadway (Johnny Cake Ridge Road). 25. Final grading, drainage, and erosion control plan shall be reviewed with the construction plans and approved by City Engineer. Sanitary Sewer 26. Public Sanitary Sewer is stubbed into the site from 157th and Everglade Avenue. Additional service connection is required off JCRR. 27. Final sanitary sewer design and construction plans shall be done by the City of Apple Valley. 28. It is anticipated that each townhome unit will have its own sewer and water service in accordance with City of Apple Valley Standard Detail Plates SER-1 and SER-1A. Water main 29. Final water main design and construction plans shall be done by the City of Apple Valley. 30. Public water main is stubbed into the site from 157th and Everglade Avenue. Additional 8" service connection is required off JCRR. Water main will need to be extended from 157th and JCRR to provide water main loop to serve this site. 31. Proposed hydrant locations will be evaluated during final design for coverage and water main maintenance. 32. Confirm that water services are to be 2" copper as indicated on note 11. Similar past townhome developments within Apple Valley have only required 1.5"copper. 33. Verify water service sizing and fire sprinkler requirements for townhome units. Storm Sewer 34. The City of Apple Valley will evaluate the crossings between the proposed public water main and private storm sewer during final design. Coordinate with City of Apple Valley during final design to resolve conflicts between water main and storm sewer. 35. Final storm sewer design shall be reviewed with the construction plans and approved by City Engineer. Landscape and Natural Resources 36. All evergreen trees shall be at least 15'-20' behind the trail or sidewalk connections to Johnny Cake Ridge Road and 157th Street to minimize future visibility and branch conflicts. 37. Ensure all other trees are planted a minimum of 15' from buildings and garages to allow for full growth with minimal pruning. 38. No major tree plantings shall be located over any underground utilities or within easements. If plantings are shown over underground utilities or within easements, the owner should have the expectation that plantings will be removed for access when needed. 39. 40. Additional landscaping is requested between the sidewalk and 10' trail along Blocks 17-19. 41. Incorporation of additional native plants into the planting plan in place of cultivars and native cultivars will have additional water quality and pollinator habitat benefits. 42. Landscaping at the northeast corner of 157th and Johnny Cake Ridge Road will need to be relocated out of drainage and utility easements and be clear of any future traffic signal components. 43. Depict the pond buffer above the HWL as shown in the Storm water Management Memorandum. :.. •:..• ... . CITY OF Apple„ ValleyMEMO Public Works TO: Tom Lovelace, City Planner FROM: Brandon S. Anderson, PE, City Engineer DATE: January 16, 2019 SUBJECT: The Shores (Pulte) at 157th and Johnny Cake Ridge Road — Offsite Drainage Comments. Grading,Drainage and Erosion Control 1. All work and infrastructure within public easements or right of way shall be to City standards. All storm sewer that will be publicly owned and maintained shall be constructed per the latest Apple Valley Standard Detail Plates and Technical Specifications. 2. The storm sewer stub at the intersection of Johnny Cake Ridge Road and 157th Street is designed to convey 5.5 cfs from the future Johnny Cake Ridge Road to the existing WVR- P443 near Johnny Cake Ridge Road and CSAH 46. Stormwater beyond the anticipated 5.5 cfs should be directed towards the proposed WVR-P54 per the Apple Valley Surface Water Management Plan(SWMP). Stormwater from 155th Street will be directed to the north to the future WVR-P53. The maximum allowable discharge from WVR-P53 to WVR-P54 is 2.3 cfs during the 100-year rainfall event per the SWMP. 3. Wet ponds and pretreatment basins (both interim and full build-out) shall meet the requirements of the MPCA's Minnesota Storm Water Manual: Design Criteria for Storm Water Ponds. It is required that public safety be considered in every aspect of pond design. a. Wet Ponds i. The minimum required total storage volume(Vts) equals the sum of the volume in the permanent pool(Vpp below the outlet elevation)plus live storage allocation for water quality volume(Vwq). Vwq equals 1.0 inch of runoff per new impervious acre. It is required that the Vwq is discharged at no more than 5.66 cubic feet per second per surface area of the pond. Additional storage may be needed to meet the allowable discharge rate of 2.3 cfs per the SWMP for WVR-P54. ii. It is required that basin outlets have energy dissipation: 1. The City of Apple Valley specifies that the maximum allowable pipe velocity at basin outlets shall be 6 fps. The velocities of the proposed pretreatment basin outlet pipes exceed 6 fps. 2. It is highly recommended that where open channels are used to convey runoff to the pond,the channels be stabilized to reduce the sediment loads. iii. The WVR-P54.1 pond outlet configuration shall be modified to reflect a skimmer structure as the primary outlet and a secondary overflow structure. The skimmer structure shall be located within the embankment and have a submerged pipe into the wet pond. The skimmer structure shall be set to skim up to the 10-year rainfall event. The skimmer structure shall provide 1' between the NWL and the top of the submerged pipe. The secondary overflow structure shall also be located within the embankment and be constructed per Apple Valley Standard Detail Plate STO-14. The rim elevation of the secondary overflow structure shall be at the HWL. Restricting storm water flow to 2.3 cfs is preferred to be done via pipe size and slope rather than a weir wall with orifice opening to limit the potential for clogging. iv. The channel between WVR-P54.1 and WVR-P54.2 in the interim condition shall be designed to prevent erosion from occurring in the open channel. The recommended maximum velocity for overland discharge is 4 fps. b. Pretreatment Basins/Fore bays i. It is required that where a fore bay is installed, direct vehicle/equipment access be provided to the fore bay for sediment removal and other maintenance activities. A 10' wide maintenance bench, 1' —2' above the NWL,with a maximum slope of 10% should be constructed around the entire perimeter of the pretreatment basins (as shown on the typical section included with the Preliminary Stormwater Management Memorandum dated November 27, 2018)in conjunction with the maintenance access. ii. It is recommended that the fore bays be sized to contain 10 percent of the water quality volume (VWq) in a pool that is four to six feet deep.Note that the fore bay storage volume counts toward the total permanent pool requirement. Vwq equals 1.0 inch of runoff per new impervious acre. The typical sections of the pretreatment basins should be modified to reflect a six-foot-deep maximum permanent pool. iii. It is recommended that the fore bays be designed with a surface area equivalent to 10 percent of the pond permanent pool surface area or equivalent to 0.1 percent of the drainage area. iv. The pretreatment basin typical sections should reflect a 6' permanent pool depth. v. It is highly recommended that flows from fore bays enter the permanent pool area with non-erosive outlet conditions. 1. The outflow pipe velocities from the pretreatment basins to the wet ponds are significantly above 6 fps. To alleviate the demand on the outlet pipe,the outlet pipe should be designed with capacity to handle the 10-year rainfall event. Rainfall events larger than the 10- year can be conveyed to the wet ponds via an overland open channel. The recommended maximum velocity for overland discharge is 4 fps. vi. Skimming shall be provided at each of the pretreatment basins to prevent floating debris from entering the main wet ponds. The outlets from the pretreatment basins shall be modified to incorporate a skimmer structure (within the embankment) and a submerged pipe in the pretreatment basin. The skimmer structure shall be set to skim up to the 10-year rainfall event. The skimmer structure shall provide 1' between the NWL and the top of the submerged pipe. c. Maintenance Access i. It is required that adequate maintenance access be provided. The City of Apple Valley requires a minimum width of 8 feet. If feasible, it is recommended that the access be 10 feet wide, have a maximum slope of 10 percent, and be appropriately stabilized for use by maintenance equipment and vehicles. ii. It is required that the maintenance access extends to the fore bay, access bench, riser, and outlet, and allows vehicles to turn around. iii. The maintenance access should be covered by drainage and utility easement and be clearly denoted on plans. The proposed easement should be shown with the proposed grading to verify that the easement encompasses all the proposed improvements. d. Pond Buffers and Setbacks i. It is highly recommended that a pond buffer extending a minimum of 16.5 feet outward from the maximum water surface elevation of the pond be provided. Permanent structures (e.g.,buildings) should not be constructed within the buffer. ii. Restoration/Landscape plan should indicate required buffer area above the HWL. e. Pond Emergency Spillway/EOF i. Indicate the emergency spillway path that will pass storms in excess of the ponds hydraulic design or if the permanent outlet pipe/structure fails. ii. In the case of WVR-P54, the existing North Creek Greenway Trail underpass will function as the emergency spillway and drain into Quarry Point Park. 4. This project is located in the East Lake watershed; East Lake is impaired due to phosphorus. Per the Apple Valley SWMP Policy 6.4, enhancements to the pond and filtration basin to capture dissolved phosphorus are recommended. 5. This project is within 1 mile of East Lake. Projects that drain to a water impaired for phosphorus,turbidity, TSS,DO or aquatic biota, and that are within a one-mile distance of that impaired water, are required to comply with sections 23.9 and 23.10 of the Minnesota NPDES Construction Permit. Portions of this project will be required to comply with sections 23.9 and 23.10: a. 23.9 -Permittees must immediately initiate stabilization of exposed soil areas, as described in item 8.4, and complete the stabilization within seven(7) calendar days after the construction activity in that portion of the site temporarily or permanently ceases. [Minn. R. 7090] b. 23.10-Permittees must provide a temporary sediment basin as described in Section 14 for common drainage locations that serve an area with five(5) or more acres disturbed at one time. [Minn. R. 7090] 6. The Hydro CAD model reflects a Manning's roughness coefficient of 0.012. The standard Manning's roughness coefficient for concrete pipe is 0.013. 7. Verify that the proposed pretreatment basin/pond data shown on the figures matches the data in the Hydro CAD model. For example,WVR-P54.5 indicates a permanent pool volume and active storage volume of 8,786 cf and 46,424 cf respectively,however, the Hydro CAD model on page 93 of the Full Build-Out Condition indicates a permanent pool volume and active storage volume 8,372 cf and 40,205 cf respectively. 8. The proposed spillway weir wall design in not acceptable to the City. a. The low flow channel opening and 6"orifice openings are too susceptible to clogging. b. The approximately 8' tall concrete wall does not follow the aesthetic goals for this area. A more "natural"look is desired for a residential/commercial area that is also anticipated to receive larger amounts of pedestrian traffic from the regional trail. 9. The North Creek Greenway Trail shall be designed per the standards in the MN DOT Bikeway Facility Design Manual for a 12' wide, 20 mph shared-use path. a. When between ponds and pretreatment basins,the minimum North Creek Greenway Trail corridor width shall be 28' wide(measured between HWLs): a 12' wide trail with 2' clear zone on both sides and a 6' buffer to the HWL on both sides allowing room for other trail amenities such as trees. b. The desired freeboard from adjacent pond/pretreatment basin HWLs to the North Creek Greenway Trail is 1'. 10. Additional trail segments shall be constructed around the perimeter of the ponds/pretreatment basins to create a"looping" feature. a. The desired freeboard from adjacent pond/pretreatment basin HWLs to the trails is 1'. 11. The discarded volumes shown in the Hydro CAD model seem very high and do not match the infiltration volumes shown in the body of the memorandum. A preliminary design of WVR-P54 done by the City estimated that the total active storage volume of WVR-P54 would be approximately 39 ac-ft.Approximately 36 ac-ft of active storage is currently provided in the proposed design. 12. Provide CAD drawings of the proposed contours and site improvements to the City Engineer. 13. Provide Hydro CAD modeling files to the City Engineer. 14. The revised Stormwater Management Memorandum shall be reviewed and approved by City Engineer. 15. Final grading, drainage, and erosion control plan shall be reviewed with the construction plans and approved by City Engineer. Kimley>>>Horn Orchard Place—Apple Valley Technical Memorandum To: Brandon Anderson,City Engineer,City of Apple Valley,MN From: William D. Matzek, P.E.,Kimley-Horn & Bra ndon Elegert, P.E.,Kimley-Horn Date: November 27,2018 Subj: Orchard Place—Shoppes at Orchard Place and the Shores Preliminary Stormwater Management Memorandum AVR, Inc. is proposing to redevelop their existing 400-acre±gravel mine generally bound by CR-42 to the north,Pilot Knob Road to the East, 157th Street to the South,and Flagstaff Avenue to the west. The development, known as Orchard Place, is intended to be a multi-phased, multi-year redevelopment. It is anticipated as mining activities are completed in various portions of the Site, the areas will be filled and redeveloped. The location map is shown in an exhibit in the Appendix. The first phase of the redevelopment is anticipated to be the Shores developments and the Shoppes at Orchard Place. The total area of the developments is approximately 75 acres. The developments generally comprise of the southern third of the overall development and are bound by Future 155th Street to the north, Pilot Knob Road to the east, 157th Street to the south, and Johnny Cake Ridge Road to the west. The first phase of the Shores is proposed to be approximately 10 acres containing 101 townhome units. The Shoppes at Orchard Place is proposed to be an approximately 40-acre retail development with approximately 300,000 square feet of retail. The Shores development is a proposed multi-phase townhome development which will be developed by Pulte. Phase II (north expansion) will consist of the construction of approximately 16 acres and 185 townhomes. The conceptual site plan is provided as part of the Appendix. This memorandum is to provide information on the existing conditions, interim conditions (after Phase I of the Shores development) and full build-out conditions of the Shores and Shoppes at Orchard Place. The stormwater management system is designed to meet the City of Apple Valley and Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's stormwater requirements for the proposed development. It is understood that the design is preliminary and as developments proceed, the stormwater management plan will be updated to confirm the applicable requirements are satisfied. Kimley-Horn has analyzed the drainage conditions of the Site and provides computations for applicable City of Apple Valley stormwater requirements in this memorandum. The analysis of existing and proposed drainage models was completed using HydroCAD, Version 10.00, a computer aided design system for modeling the hydrology and hydraulics of stormwater runoff. These calculations are largely based on the hydrology techniques developed by the Soil Conservation Service (SCS/NRCS), combined with other hydrology and hydraulics calculations.All calculations, hydrographs, and drainage area maps are provided in the appendix of this memorandum. Existing Conditions The area of the proposed development was previously mined by AVR, Inc. Since mining has been completed, the site has been partially filled and rough graded. To support the redevelopment of the Site, an 18" RCP storm sewer stub has been provided to the site near the recently completed 1 ffil0.i afmrr .767 Eustis Street,Suite 100,'Saint Paul,MN 55114 651 645 4197 Kimley >>>Horn Orchard Place—Apple Valley Technical Memorandum trail underpass from 157th Street. The Site generally drains to a rough graded pond north of the trail underpass north of 157th Street. Based on the USDA websoil survey of the Site, the Site soils (gravel and sand)would be classified as hydrologic soil group (HSG)A. Interim Conditions The first phase of the development is proposed to be Phase I of the Shores by Pulte. The first phase of the development will consist of 101 units of town homes located at the NEC of 157th Street and Johnny Cake Ridge Road. The development will consist of the construction of the townhomes, associated infrastructure (private/public utilities and private roadways) and landscaping. The proposed development will consist of approximately 10 acres. It is understood the preliminary plans were submitted to the City by Pulte in November 2018. Runoff from Phase 1 of the development will be directed to a proposed pre-treatment basin east of the site via overland flow and storm sewer. The pretreatment basin will allow for settlement of larger particles of sediment prior to discharging into the existing rough graded pond. Once water is discharged to the existing pond,it is anticipated that the water will infiltrate and no runoff from the pond will occur. The stormwater management best management practices (BMPs) are proposed to provide infiltration and rate control to meet the City and MPCA's requirements. Based on the web soil survey (HSG A), the interim infiltration rate is assumed to be 1.63 in/hr. This will require field tesing to verify. Full Build-Out Conditions The Shores and The Shoppes at Orchard Place developments will consist of approximately 70 acres of the existing AVR gravel mine. As previously mentioned,the Shores project will consist of 110 townhome units in Phase I and ultimately will contain 286 townhome units on approximately 26 acres. The Shores development will also include; parking, private roadways, utilities and landscaping. The Shoppes at Orchard Place will include approximately 300,000 square feet of retail, parking, utilities,and landscaping. To support the redevelopment, two wet ponds are proposed to be constructed. The area of the wet ponds will also contain public amenities such as trails and gathering spaces. The wet ponds will provide rate control to comply with the allowable discharge of 2.3 cfs. The wet ponds are also to be sized to allow for up to 2.3 cfs of runoff from development north of 155th Street. For the purposes of this study, it is assumed that 2.3 cfs of runoff is contributing from the north of 155th Street. The base of the ponds will be lined with clay to allow for permanent pool storage. In addition to providing rate control, the ponds will also include an infiltration bench to meet the required City and MPCA infiltration requirements. The infiltration bench is proposed to contain engineered soils meeting the characteristics of an HSG A soil with an allowable infiltration rate of 1.63 in/hr. The infiltration benches have been designed to drain within 48 hours. Atypical cross section of the wet ponds is provided in the Appendix. Water that does discharge from the Site will be discharged into an existing 18"storm sewer stub provided near the trail underpass along 157th Street. Stormwater Management Requirements `C i-tro r r c)cri.s o) o 67 Eustis Street,Suite 100,Saint Paul,MN 55114 651 645 4197 KimIey>>> Horn Orchard Place—Apple Valley Technical Memorandum The City of Apple Valley's Storm Drainage Ordinance provides requirements for rate control and volume reduction. The City of Apple Valley allows for a maximum stormwater run-off of 2.3 cubic feet per second for the proposed development. Below is a summary of the runoff conditions in the interim and full build-out conditions. *Pond Proposed 100- Year Runoff(cfs) Interim Condition Discharge 0 Rate Full Build-Out Discharge 1.95 Rate *The drainage resulting from the area of Pulte's Site (approximately 1.6 acres) that cannot be routed to the onsite basins will be routed to storm sewer within 157th Street and will be treated offs ite. The MPCA requires volume reduction of 1" over newly constructed impervious. The City of Apple Valley also requires on-site infiltration of the first one-half inch from any rainfall event. Based on the existing conditions of the Site,the MPCA's requirements will be more stringent. The required infiltration amount is calculated utilizing the formula below: Volume of infiltration required(ac ft)=.0833 ft*Proposed Impervious Area(ac) The infiltration volume provided accounts for the infiltration provided below the lowest outlet in each of the BMPs. In the interim condition,it is anticipated that infiltration will be provided with the existing excavated basin. In the full build-out condition, infiltration will be provided via infiltration benches in the proposed wet ponds. The infiltration benches for the full build-out wet ponds have been designed to draw down within 48 hours, which is consistent with the Minnesota Stormwater Manual. Below is a summary of the proposed BMPs and the infiltration provided. iONIPi' 'ei2,t?p . 767 Eustis Street,Suite 100,Saint Paul,MN 55114 651 645 4197 Kimley>>> Horn Orchard Place—Apple Valley Technical Memorandum Newly Created Infiltration Impervious Volume Required Infiltration Volume Development Scenario Area(Ac.) (Ac-ft) Provided (Ac-ft) Interim Condition (Shores Phase I) 5.3 0.44 8.73 Full Build-Out Condition 23.72 1.98 2.05 Please contact me at(651)643-0497 if you have any questions. Sincerely, KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES,INC. William D. Matzek,P.E. Appendix: • Site Location Map—Ex-1 • The Shores Preliminary Plan (Full Build-Out)—Ex-2 • The Shores Phase I Drainage Map—Ex-3 • Full Build-Out Drainage Map—Ex-4 • Preliminary Wet Pond Cross Sections —Ex-5 • Interim Conditions HydroCAD Model • Full Build-Out Conditions HydroCAD Model ,ic'"P it.P,7�i F)pr 767 Eustis Street,Suite 100,Saint Paul,MN 55114 651 6454197 Ki ley>>>Horn Orchard Place—Apple Valley Technical Memorandum THE SHORES PRELIMINARY PLAN (FULL BUILD-OUT) 4cnai:eorq ea'..i 767 Eustis Street,Suite 100,Saint Paul,MN 55114 651 645 4197 ):) ) ! 2'8 I. i I I i! 1 Cl' "' -7.• !:' .....__-..., - = Zi4 L-L_-, _ _ _ _ 1 , i - 11-1,8 I m 2 DI gg § 1 iii ill E . fi ,. 1:4 ni 1,01i 1 I iE OE.I 11 r i 1 .51.aii S.21...... Enid --—— g.0 N: I •t' 1 1 11 i i i :._i_N.::':..).)•2 ' \-.;10:si'':;C: --i I i i Fini 1 i 11 i 2 - 1.i i 1 —::"4--- ---- - 1 . li ; i ii i W 12/ ;11 i " ' 1—Zi; — 3 43 :1 ,........L._ . - i .. ! , - : li, ti, i I g„ .... ___ I IT IT . IN .,,,,, ::, _. ,1 ;5 1 1 Li i r, Lci 1210 " 11 in 3 1 ° • r „ . , :•-• 21 r s . m ..I Of Of —........E—'r-Z. L f— .71 : .., / I..- ....1 r • 1 S. • i 4 1: •.., -a .:.. Hi i..:: e-, ' I =••=. / „ ——i-— Ill —— i/ ''''',,=01 /:” —.•'- ,7--'- '4,.Z.1.7.7::411— E .::: ...): = ( ,:.r 1,1 N, II N 11,11 RI!All 111! §P ,-1 ok. ...:: . :•; lot 11E11 1011 1138 -...--..,„- - - '4 -.=-==_,_„.•' s., - z • • _ 11E11 mil waviliiii,i Eiiia Ag.... - . .... . z ...: • 'ors 2, - TVLIT ei ''''''' ." 4 ,:: El 11#10 ihil 46• _ '691,41 !Jai= MI 1111 CC 'Ma iiiihimEN lair .--..n. VI ---- '7'0, IS Iljim Ot !I= :Mt• Enrol . .82 ow 3 ,." Ili. iiii I—. :Iiff . w ---; 111114 Filial gall 'IM. IMI . - - -MO . :isj mei ,ii =6. Imi 1 IBM 'ftin to *ZIA oniki 1 mul I Ali %. 17.-uj tit' ( .1t1-141 I 010. 111: : ow ii'ml '1 - Ilkirek, .4 co 4.5" 411_.... -.0g Mil.'i, ,„1-1-1 liniti ,.1 ow ;mg,4., .... 3< .... INI. FM =Ps 1 i. ... MEN I *0 . mil 1: MR if <IC 1=1• . IlMis . = Imin NI= I i 1 Cl) I e. *A 0- ei . -- .. :gml ._. 017,. . . • !poi. I ..•. 0 ._. ... -4 :ft,44' i. lull -lam 'Er 12:: . to - /4-,• ... .,...:-. igas ...1 ,... %too , *ih 711=14 ik',71010,* 4114111:I (3 ng I I.5 4/0V'400' 0,40 ins mil 1 tium, mum\ • ritEi. mini: //‘ A`, 1-- cn *to\ # •=1111 mu _ . .40'0%40 I ImHil l'im 44. , Imo 1 '"''' 'i WirEVE . vieliTi—iteili /SA we.o.! memo.N)4.' / 11011 - 11E11 11011 40 lin 1111 */' ' A \O--1:1--, - • Ili - ' - - --- - / j ' , z co i UJ ): CC w I 4 ) ''••. I 1 I 1 1 I I / . / 87 Cn uj> ci- I— 4 t----/'-- : 1 I , IIIIIIIITh < ( ( __H , , , 11 wot,„_9102 "OV PO I.1.1.q.ix3 Old 10000-s.+045 0411V.,000,.\OL1081\910Z\0 ....."....0 Kimsey>>> Horn Orchard Place—Apple Valley Technical Memorandum THE SHORES PHASE I DRAINAGE MAP kimley-:hoin.com 767 Eustis Street,Suite 100,Saint Paul,MN 55114 651 645 4197 A. WO MC. ,m, »Opp »I°°m _ • •. . 7. - dVNI 39VNIV2IO NW'A311VA31ddY • oVON BONN lo1Id 7 uaoH«<AaIwiN - a.»7 ° 4M 13SVHd S3t1OHS oNV1s3M133aisNlLSt 1x NOI10f 1SN00 210.1 ION — A8VNIV1I13Id I i ' OYOu BONA 1O1d • 1 z I .I 4...40 : IL � K i L_1 i € II I I -I ., I 7% '1 • � 4, 1 3 '-I YMI1 yy S 1 ; L _1 h I �� I � ICI _I I I 4�) — H 1 rl 1 ` 1 • [o arve $d'cr.. 1 ri 111i 161s1 a 1 1 11i1; • E tl1� iYii:ilile �• +r- sale. ais`; I •. . . Ilinlii i..• f/ tt•'E, A, �Biii Dili rc ,.. • s� Fogmy isr,-1- • • • • • riiiii,-*,#),4-4.9i.i s. I fir;:, ;6:: Ran: ; is'oij I• . • - ---I--i�_.: - - ` = • �; - \k�_ OtlOM 3Oolt!3AtlO ANNNaf 1I I r - 1 I 1 I I I I 1 I a.n�.r...+.,.v»,w..,...». ....w.r..`+r.r+w»»r.un..+_�..._�»-._..-.�••.0/27-010E '[z SVuSON 0.0.11@V.3.6oN.ro w!alvi\.ugW3\elo0 34\V61toa CVaoor.Id#o\WYU]07-0Ml\:M K mIey)>> Horn Orchard Place—Apple Valley Technical Memorandum FULL BUILD-OUT DRAINAGE MAP aki•rriiey 9horn.c,om 767 Eustis Street,Suite 100,Saint Paul,MN 55114 651 645 4197 A6 nra POEM!, •' Ohl __ @"""°•• ana .a mw d`dW 3�Jt/NI�IQ Ni A311NA 31ddY (WON 130N)1 1011d uiOH((`Aa'W!N Y w°L'IZ'°.. 1f10-aiine llflJ 0Nd133M133?J1SH1[St a esereararannoawolcuraoms NOLL0f eJ1SNO0 21Od ION - A2iVNIWl1321d I I avow BONN Ind 44 1�i�= :=---— _ ....� IIIomrar ./ _ ,_,— I�`. S \.49 : I 1 J� 10IllAir f, 1 el ..,, !i'' I \ �y `t\ '11 kilt.1, 1'11 i t11 ,. �N1f1 I }�s o r� 'fir I 1 %f`_ Y 1 I I!1110 , v'1, . 'S 't� j, ■■ 1i .4. Imi.- iiie, !1 it 1 � el i � ,)1 i 1 • on , ,' � - l III _ � I , , -i, -1 ., / JE, � .-ow •�+ brot _I AI, , I 1 — -.1PE-41.....Farl =1, .".4- - _kiwi ii imiTiii,-- .1 1 , LI111R+IA ' / i I1\ \: 1 .• kil,.1_1i--JM--4 4\s, ___i - ) ' _'', ' �, iii 95; .. 1___ a�%% f'Ntaiiiimappr '•:3,i \iq7' r"�—� -�q'Alikq', � 11 i/ „ I �7 1\ 3• I z4 `' iR ,� fl ..6„ a. % 1 op11=< 1 1�1 1 I I �I n g _ (- l €�re� 11, ,,, ,•I, f g ��� ILA 1• !a.i3i r/ V��; L. — _€11 /� ftp a 6 1 .� A rw 1, • D ,1�� 14 Inn itmiiifiiN f. egg�((gg/��! • l�'JJ,�I Jt rJ if 8J I . ,sl mi,i,misminidil,miwgryDr.,-,7 +..p Ir.lil� .. Jew ;\ 11f ,,.1 '� Qlm,mlE!!E! Ellin!®.� ` $z� fr s ' I • xv�'�rthlriki �1 111111111, , P - I ;�� s Al r Imo' 1 tar a r11f a " , , ilt iil � clii�5i( , ft pit ' ■ .i� 1117,..riff *CM'111117 ia-i- If61 6rJ+IIB11 giriAirirgli,I i'All pnlil ;qw 1/!��� q �`,�y,■ a :r- kiliff!S�N.131 �=11.alsoma ei'lt41�im Ell i, 1 1 !� �1k ■ rinak /IiG"1'sil Ilan 1 p - :�1,_ i maw .0% 001 Irmo! rg3901 1 „E!' 1 +rg '�:�. 1io -M E n9qu im'i 1 !f l'• :Ca ,,�� ��. •V �t :e �an �Iq6� �4/rl /111 -. e�®. ', '� g/ wIiJRi n� uigle Inl,ii. 11,,,I. I ' ,0 , 111E "'Mali j / I 4 !Imliii I mull•Ismii I,, �!itf'f•g, 1 t l•�f,i l I ,4A.- st, , ., (: ,ii,. ( �1 . MN1iI11 ,i \ jj1 I 1-1 rilel:k. o �' • /// II •.:. JI ! EII!IEI,re m!wrizIil=!!M!!a!m Vi1 •■ \a,m�,r i d'•'�'3�. 1 (I(►i,i_I 1- 11111 11111 14111 IIA fi 1i=Q: II :;: .. ii •;`E` �i T �/ - � , _ .— � .,.. —I,lk-�Y ) « •°VON 3`001d 3NV0 ANNH01' I �-JI 11 M)Y'�rr., \ - Wxre-gm 'cz ngWanoN B.PILIWPI a6ou!o.0\all@W3\a6oulogNu61oo0 cV.IPA-aIddy\tNV\Amy-3pLL\°N :.. •:..• ... . CITY OF Apple„ ValleyMEMO Public Works TO: Will Matzek, Kimley-Horn FROM: Brandon S. Anderson, PE, City Engineer DATE: January 8, 2019 SUBJECT: The Shores (Pulte) at 157th and Johnny Cake Ridge Road — Offsite Drainage Comments. Grading,Drainage and Erosion Control 1. The proposed improvements within The Shores as shown on the Preliminary Plat Submittal prepared by Alliant Engineering and the proposed improvements of the ponding area as shown on the Preliminary Stormwater Management Memorandum prepared by Kimley- Horn should correlate with each another. The following are examples of items that should match: a. Grading contours and critical elevations (e.g. NWL and HWL). b. Proposed site improvements (e.g.building pads, sidewalks,trails, etc.) c. Proposed utilities (e.g. storm sewer) d. Proposed property lines and easements 2. All work and infrastructure within public easements or right of way shall be to City standards. All storm sewer that will be publicly owned and maintained shall be constructed per the latest Apple Valley Standard Detail Plates and Technical Specifications. 3. The storm sewer stub at the intersection of Johnny Cake Ridge Road and 157th Street is designed to convey 5.5 cfs from the future Johnny Cake Ridge Road to the existing WVR- P443 near Johnny Cake Ridge Road and CSAH 46. Stormwater beyond the anticipated 5.5 cfs should be directed towards the proposed WVR-P54 per the Apple Valley Surface Water Management Plan (SWMP). Stormwater from 155th Street will be directed to the north to the future WVR-P53. The maximum allowable discharge from WVR-P53 to WVR-P54 is 2.3 cfs during the 100-year rainfall event per the SWMP. 4. Wet ponds and pretreatment basins (both interim and full build-out) shall meet the requirements of the MPCA's Minnesota Storm Water Manual: Design Criteria for Storm Water Ponds. It is required that public safety be considered in every aspect of pond design. a. Wet Ponds i. The minimum required total storage volume (Vts) equals the sum of the volume in the permanent pool(Vpp below the outlet elevation)plus live storage allocation for water quality volume(Vwq). Vwq equals 1.0 inch of runoff per new impervious acre. It is required that the Vwq is discharged at no more than 5.66 cubic feet per second per surface area of the pond. Additional storage may be needed to meet the allowable discharge rate of 2.3 cfs per the SWMP for WVR-P54. ii. It is required that basin outlets have energy dissipation: 1. The City of Apple Valley specifies that the maximum allowable pipe velocity at basin outlets shall be 6 fps. The velocities of the proposed pretreatment basin outlet pipes exceed 6 fps. 2. It is highly recommended that where open channels are used to convey runoff to the pond,the channels be stabilized to reduce the sediment loads. iii. The WVR-P54.1 pond outlet configuration shall be modified to reflect a skimmer structure as the primary outlet and a secondary overflow structure. The skimmer structure shall be located within the embankment and have a submerged pipe into the wet pond. The skimmer structure shall be set to skim up to the 10-year rainfall event. The skimmer structure shall provide 1' between the NWL and the top of the submerged pipe. The secondary overflow structure shall also be located within the embankment and be constructed per Apple Valley Standard Detail Plate STO-14. The rim elevation of the secondary overflow structure shall be at the HWL. Restricting stormwater flow to 2.3 cfs is preferred to be done via pipe size and slope rather than a weir wall with orifice opening to limit the potential for clogging. iv. The channel between WVR-P54.1 and WVR-P54.2 in the interim condition shall be designed to prevent erosion from occurring in the open channel. The recommended maximum velocity for overland discharge is 4 fps. b. Pretreatment Basins/Fore bays i. It is required that where a fore bay is installed, direct vehicle/equipment access be provided to the fore bay for sediment removal and other maintenance activities. A 10' wide maintenance bench, 1' —2' above the NWL,with a maximum slope of 10% should be constructed around the entire perimeter of the pretreatment basins (as shown on the typical section included with the Preliminary Stormwater Management Memorandum dated November 27,2018)in conjunction with the maintenance access. ii. It is recommended that the fore bays be sized to contain 10 percent of the water quality volume (Vwq) in a pool that is four to six feet deep.Note that the fore bay storage volume counts toward the total permanent pool requirement. Vwq equals 1.0 inch of runoff per new impervious acre. The typical sections of the pretreatment basins should be modified to reflect a six-foot-deep maximum permanent pool. iii. It is recommended that the fore bays be designed with a surface area equivalent to 10 percent of the pond permanent pool surface area or equivalent to 0.1 percent of the drainage area. iv. The pretreatment basin typical sections should reflect a 6' permanent pool depth. v. It is highly recommended that flows from fore bays enter the permanent pool area with non-erosive outlet conditions. 1. The outflow pipe velocities from the pretreatment basins to the wet ponds are significantly above 6 fps. To alleviate the demand on the outlet pipe,the outlet pipe should be designed with capacity to handle the 10-year rainfall event. Rainfall events larger than the 10- year can be conveyed to the wet ponds via an overland open channel. The recommended maximum velocity for overland discharge is 4 fps. vi. Skimming shall be provided at each of the pretreatment basins to prevent floating debris from entering the main wet ponds. The outlets from the pretreatment basins shall be modified to incorporate a skimmer structure (within the embankment) and a submerged pipe in the pretreatment basin. The skimmer structure shall be set to skim up to the 10-year rainfall event. The skimmer structure shall provide 1' between the NWL and the top of the submerged pipe. c. Maintenance Access i. It is required that adequate maintenance access be provided. The City of Apple Valley requires a minimum width of 8 feet. If feasible, it is recommended that the access be 10 feet wide, have a maximum slope of 10 percent, and be appropriately stabilized for use by maintenance equipment and vehicles. ii. It is required that the maintenance access extends to the fore bay, access bench, riser, and outlet, and allows vehicles to turn around. iii. The maintenance access should be covered by drainage and utility easement and be clearly denoted on plans. The proposed easement should be shown with the proposed grading to verify that the easement encompasses all the proposed improvements. d. Pond Buffers and Setbacks i. It is highly recommended that a pond buffer extending a minimum of 16.5 feet outward from the maximum water surface elevation of the pond be provided. Permanent structures (e.g.,buildings) should not be constructed within the buffer. There appears to be an encroachment into this buffer near WVR-P54.3. An unnamed hatch is show adjacent to the proposed building and encroaching into the pond buffer. ii. Restoration/Landscape plan should indicate required buffer area above the HWL. e. Pond Emergency Spillway/EOF i. Indicate the emergency spillway path that will pass storms in excess of the ponds hydraulic design or if the permanent outlet pipe/structure fails. ii. In the case of WVR-P54, the existing North Creek Greenway Trail underpass will function as the emergency spillway and drain into Quarry Point Park. 5. This project is located in the East Lake watershed; East Lake is impaired due to phosphorus. Per the Apple Valley SWMP Policy 6.4, enhancements to the pond and filtration basin to capture dissolved phosphorus are recommended. 6. This project is within 1 mile of East Lake. Projects that drain to a water impaired for phosphorus,turbidity, TSS,DO or aquatic biota, and that are within a one-mile distance of that impaired water, are required to comply with sections 23.9 and 23.10 of the Minnesota NPDES Construction Permit. Portions of this project will be required to comply with sections 23.9 and 23.10: a. 23.9 -Permittees must immediately initiate stabilization of exposed soil areas, as described in item 8.4, and complete the stabilization within seven(7) calendar days after the construction activity in that portion of the site temporarily or permanently ceases. [Minn. R. 7090] b. 23.10-Permittees must provide a temporary sediment basin as described in Section 14 for common drainage locations that serve an area with five(5)or more acres disturbed at one time. [Minn. R. 7090] 7. The HydroCAD model reflects a Manning's roughness coefficient of 0.012. The standard Manning's roughness coefficient for concrete pipe is 0.013. 8. Verify that the proposed pretreatment basin/pond data shown on the figures matches the data in the HydroCAD model. For example,WVR-P54.5 indicates a permanent pool volume and active storage volume of 8,786 cf and 46,424 cf respectively, however, the HydroCAD model on page 93 of the Full Build-Out Condition indicates a permanent pool volume and active storage volume 8,372 cf and 40,205 cf respectively. 9. The proposed spillway weir wall design in not acceptable to the City. a. The low flow channel opening and 6"orifice openings are too susceptible to clogging. b. The approximately 8' tall concrete wall does not follow the aesthetic goals for this area. A more "natural"look is desired for a residential/commercial area that is also anticipated to receive larger amounts of pedestrian traffic from the regional trail. 10. The construction of iron enhanced sand filter benches will not be required. Additional phosphorous load reduction measures beyond 3,600 cubic feet per acre of drainage area permanent pool volume and 8-foot maximum permanent pool depth are not required. 11. The 20' wide, 20:1 bench within the wet ponds shall be designated as a vegetative buffer, not an infiltration bench. 12. Is an elevation of the proposed trail amenity between WVR-P54.3 and WVR-P54.6 available? Freeboard will need to be checked between the amenity and the surrounding HWLs. 13. The proposed grading contours reflect areas with very steep slopes (primarily on the east side of the proposed ponds and around the proposed spillway). Are retaining wall proposed in these areas or is the grading to be modified? The maximum slope for green space to be maintained by the City is 3:1. 14. The North Creek Greenway Trail shall be designed per the standards in the MnDOT Bikeway Facility Design Manual for a 12' wide, 20 mph shared-use path. a. When between ponds and pretreatment basins,the minimum North Creek Greenway Trail corridor width shall be 28' wide(measured between HWLs): a 12' wide trail with 2' clear zone on both sides and a 6' buffer to the HWL on both sides allowing room for other trail amenities such as trees. b. The desired freeboard from adjacent pond/pretreatment basin HWLs to the North Creek Greenway Trail is 1'. 15. Additional trail segments shall be constructed around the perimeter of the ponds/pretreatment basins to create a"looping" feature. a. The desired freeboard from adjacent pond/pretreatment basin HWLs to the trails is 1'. 16. The discarded volumes shown in the HydroCAD model seem very high and do not match the infiltration volumes shown in the body of the memorandum. A preliminary design of WVR-P54 done by the City estimated that the total active storage volume of WVR-P54 would be approximately 39 ac-ft. Approximately 36 ac-ft of active storage is currently provided in the proposed design. 17. The figure titled"The Shores Preliminary Plan(Full Build-Out)"in the Stormwater Management Memorandum should be revised to reflect the latest site and grading configuration. 18. Provide CAD drawings of the proposed contours and site improvements to the City Engineer. 19. Provide HydroCAD modeling files to the City Engineer. 20. The revised Stormwater Management Memorandum shall be reviewed and approved by City Engineer. 21. Final grading, drainage, and erosion control plan shall be reviewed with the construction plans and approved by City Engineer. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP BY REZONING CERTAIN LAND IN THE CITY OF APPLE VALLEY,DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Apple Valley held a public hearing on property described herein on December 5, 2018 as required by City Code Section 155.400(D), and WHEREAS, on January 16, 2019, the Planning Commission recommended the rezoning as hereinafter described. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Apple Valley,Dakota County,Minnesota,that: 1. The boundaries of the zoning districts established by City Code Section 155.006 are hereby amended by rezoning the following described property located at the northeast corner of 157t1i Street West and Johnny Cake Ridge Road, from"SG"(Sand and Gravel)to "M- 6C"(Multi-Family Residential/6-12 units per acre): Blocks 1-22 and Outlots A-M, The Shores, according to the preliminary plat 2. This ordinance shall become effective upon its passage and publication. Passed this 23rd day of July, 2020 Mary Hamann-Roland, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk CITY OF APPLE VALLEY RESOLUTION NO. 2020- PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPROVAL THE SHORES ADDITION WHEREAS,pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 462.358,the City of Apple Valley adopted, as Chapter 153 of the City Code,regulations to control the subdivision of land within its borders; and WHEREAS,pursuant to Chapter 153 of the City Code,the City Planning Commission held a public hearing on an application for subdivision of land by plat on December 5, 2018; and WHEREAS,the City Planning Commission reviewed the preliminary subdivision for conformance with the standards of Chapter 153 of the City Code and made a recommendation regarding its approval on January 16, 2019, subject to conditions. NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Apple Valley, Dakota County, Minnesota,that the preliminary subdivision as depicted on proposed preliminary plat to be known as The Shores, dated January 10, 2019. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that said preliminary subdivision approval is subject to the appropriate amendment to the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and rezoning,which must be completed prior to final plat approval. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,pursuant to Chapter 153 of the City Code,that said preliminary subdivision approval is subject to the following conditions,which shall be satisfied or incorporated into a development agreement to be considered for approval at the time of submission of the request for final plat approval: 1. The final plat shall be configured to have 101 lots and 11 outlots (Outlot L shall be incorporated into adjacent Outlots G, H, and I on the final plat and Outlot M shall be incorporated into Outlot K prior on the final plat. 2. Park dedication requirements are based upon the City's finding that the subdivision will create 212 residents/occupants that will generate a need for 2.03 acres of parkland in accordance with adopted City standards for park services. Acceptance of a .28-acre easement for a future trail share satisfy a portion of the park dedication requirement. The remaining dedication of 1.75 acres shall be satisfied by a cash-in-lieu of land at the current per acre benchmark land value at the time of dedication,which the City reasonably determines that it will need to expend to acquire land elsewhere in order to provide the necessary park services as a result of this subdivision. 3. Development within the subdivision shall occur in conformance with the site plan dated January 10, 2019, including parking lot paving and a non- surmountable concrete curb and gutter around the entire perimeter with a minimum driveway approach radius of 15' at each public street, and a valley gutter at the edge of the street pavement. 4. A sidewalk connection shall be made from Lot 4, Block 19 building to the sidewalk along the east side of Road A. 5. A sidewalk connection between units in Block 20 and 21 shall be made to the pathway along the north side of 157th Street West. 6. All temporary motor vehicle turnarounds associated with any phasing of development within the subdivision shall be approved by the City prior to its construction 7. Development within the subdivision shall occur in conformance with the landscape plan dated January 10, 2019, (including sodded/seeded public boulevard area up to each street curbline); subject to submission of a detailed landscape planting price list for verification of the City's 21/2% landscaping requirement at the time of building permit application and revisions identified in the City Engineer's memo dated January 16, 2019. 8. Construction of buildings/dwelling units within the subdivision shall occur in conformance with the elevation plans dated September 24, 2019 and September 30, 2019. 9. Issuance of a building permit and a final certificate of occupancy for buildings/structures within the subdivision is contingent upon the project being constructed in conformance with all the preceding conditions as well as all applicable performance standards of the current zoning regulations. In the event that a certificate of occupancy is requested prior to completion of all required site improvements, a suitable financial guarantee in the amount of 125%of the estimated cost of the unfinished improvements shall be required along with an agreement authorizing the City or its agents to enter the premises and complete the required improvements if they are not completed by a reasonably stipulated deadline,with the cost of such City completion to be charged against the financial guarantee. 10. The ongoing use and occupancy of buildings/structures within the subdivision shall be predicated on their ongoing maintenance and all required site improvements as listed in the preceding. No alteration,removal, or change to the required site improvements shall occur without the express authorization of the City. Site improvements,which have deteriorated due to age or wear, shall be repaired or replaced in a timely fashion. 11. Submission of a final grading plan and lot elevations with erosion control procedures,to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. The applicant shall also submit a copy of the of the General Storm Water Permit approval from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency pursuant to Minnesota Rules 7100.1000- 7100.1100. regarding the State NPDES Permit prior to commencement of grading activity. 12. Site grading within the subdivision shall occur in conformance with a Natural Resources Management Plan(NRMP), which shall include final grading plan to be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer. 2 13. Storm water pond dedication requirements shall be provided in accordance with adopted City standards for storm water management and per approved construction of WVR P54. This dedication shall be satisfied by a land contribution to serve the plat as determined by the City Engineer. 14. The applicant shall be responsible for the grading, construction and dedication of a regional storm water facility sized to meet the over-all needs of the subdivision and other lands in order to provide the necessary storm water management as a result of this subdivision. The applicant acknowledges that the ponding is anticipated to be located on property beyond the boundaries of the subdivision. Completion of the grading and acceptance of the storm water pond by the City is required prior to City Council approval of a final plat. 15. The applicant shall construct all storm water ponding necessary to serve this plat prior to issuance of any building permits for buildings/dwelling units contained within the plat. 16. Dedication on the final plat of draining and utility easements within the plat sufficient to serve all units within the development, either as defined or blanket easements. 17. Installation of municipal sanitary sewer, water, storm sewer, and street improvements as necessary to serve the plat, constructed in accordance with adopted City standards, including the acquisition of any necessary easements outside the boundaries of the plat which are needed to install connections to said necessary improvements. The applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City for payment of the design of said municipal improvements. 18. The applicant shall be responsible for the costs of design and installation of all public and private utilities and streets necessary to serve the plat. 19. The proposed subdivision requires the construction of Johnny Cake Ridge Road north to 155th Street and the construction of a roundabout at the intersection(the"Road Improvements")to provide a secondary access. The applicant shall be responsible for the cost to design the Road Improvements and in connection with City approval of a final plat, the applicant shall be responsible to either complete the construction of the Road Improvements and provide the City with a letter of credit sufficient to assure completion according to City specifications, or agree to the assessable cost attributable to the subdivision, as determined by the City's Engineer, in conjunction with a city council approved public improvement project to construct the Road Improvements. 20. Installation of pedestrian improvements in accordance with the City's adopted Trail and Sidewalk Policies,to consist of eight-foot(8')wide along bituminous pathways along Johnny Cake Ridge Road. 3 21. Installation of City street trees on boulevard areas of public street right-of- ways, in accordance with species, size, and spacing standards established in the Apple Valley Streetscape Management Plan. 22. Dedication of one foot(1')wide easements,which restricts direct driveway access to Johnny Cake Ridge Road and 157th Street West. 23. Dedication of scenic/conservation easements over the rear yard area of lots abutting Johnny Cake Ridge Road and 157th Street West to preclude removal of earth berms and landscaping installed adjacent to the roadway. 24. Installation of a public (or private) street lighting system, constructed to City and Dakota Electric Company standards. 25. A separate application and signage plan in conformance with the sign regulations must be submitted for review and approval to the City prior to the erection of any signs. 26. Construction shall be limited to the hours 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. 27. Earthmoving activities shall be limited to the hours 6:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. 28. Earthmoving activities shall not occur when wind velocity exceeds thirty(30) miles per hour. Watering to control dust shall occur as needed and whenever directed by the Apple Valley Building Official or Zoning Administrator. 29. The City receives a hold harmless agreement in favor of the City as drafted by the City Attorney and incorporated into the development agreement. ADOPTED this 23rd day of July, 2020. Mary Hamann-Roland, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk 4 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY RESOLUTION NO. 2020- A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE SHORESAND ATTACHING CONDITIONS THERETO WHEREAS,pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 462.357 the City of Apple Valley has adopted, as Title XV of the City Code of Ordinances, zoning regulations to control land uses throughout the City; and WHEREAS, said regulations provide that apartment and townhouse dwelling units may be constructed with an exposed finish materials other than those provided under Section 155.346 as regulated in Section 155.078 of the city code may be allowed within the confines of the "M-1", "M-2", "M-3", "M-4", "M-5", "M-6", "M-7", and"M-8"zoning districts and in accordance with specific performance standards, as a conditional use; and WHEREAS, approval of a Conditional Use Permit for exposed finish materials other than those provided under Section 155.346 has been requested by Pulte Homes of Minnesota,LLC; and WHEREAS,review of such Conditional Use Permit request to determine its conformance with the applicable regulations and performance standards has occurred at a public hearing held on-December 5,2018; and WHEREAS,the Apple Valley Planning Commission recommended approval of such Conditional Use Permit subject to certain conditions on January 16, 2019. NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Apple Valley, Dakota County, Minnesota,that a Conditional Use Permit for exposed finish materials other than those provided under Section 155.346 within an"M-6C"zone be approved subject to compliance with all applicable City codes and standards, and the following conditions: 1. The Conditional Use Permit shall apply to property legally described as The Shores, according to the final plat. 2. Such operations shall be conducted in conformance with the site plan dated January 10,2019, on file at the City Offices. 3. Such operations shall be conducted in conformance with the elevation plans dated September 24, 2019 and September 30, 2019, on file at the City Offices. 4. The materials used shall have the appearance of wood siding having a maximum plank width of twelve(12) inches. 5. The use of sheet or corrugated aluminum, iron, steel, sheet plywood or similar materials which have no three-dimensional relief, or plain or painted concrete block shall be prohibited. 6. Any decorative concrete block shall be colored only by means of pigment impregnated throughout the entire block. 7. The Conditional Use Permit may be revoked for cause if the terms of(2) or(3) or(4) or(5) or(6)preceding are not adhered to. ADOPTED this 23rd day of July, 2020. Mary Hamann-Roland, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk CERTIFICATE I, Pamela Gackstetter, Apple Valley City Clerk, hereby certify that the forgoing is a true and correct copy of a resolution adopted by the City Council on September 14, 2006, the original of which is in my possession, dated this day of , 200 . Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk 2 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY RESOLUTION NO. 2020- RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF LAND BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF Apple Valley,Minnesota: Rockport, LLC, ("Rockport") is the fee owner of land located in the city of Apple Valley, Minnesota("City"). Legally described as follows: The North '/2 of the southeast '/4 of Section 35, Township 1115 Range 20, except those portions platted as Regions Point; Quarry Ponds Fourth Addition; and Quarry Ponds Fifth Addition. ("Property") Rockport as seller desires to convey to Pulte Homes of Minnesota, LLC ("Pulte") a portion of the property, which is legally described as follows: That part of the North Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 35, Township 115, Range 20 North, Dakota County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of Lot 2, Block 2, QUARRY PONDS FOURTH ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota; thence North 89 degrees 59 minutes 39 seconds East, assumed bearing along the south line of said QUARRY PONDS FOURTH ADDITION, said line also being the north line of REGENT'S POINT, according to the recorded plat thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota, a distance of 100.00 feet to the east line of Johnny Cake Ridge Road as dedicated on said plat of QUARRY PONDS FOURTH ADDITION, and the point of beginning; thence North 00 degrees 03 minutes 14 seconds West, along said east line of Johnny Cake Ridge Road, a distance of 454.31 feet; thence East 594.38 feet; thence North 10.00 feet; thence East 221.60 feet; thence North 11.08 feet; thence East 121.46 feet; thence South 08 degrees 21 minutes 45 seconds West 73.42 feet; thence South 01 degrees 08 minutes 28 seconds East 195.53 feet; thence South 22 degrees 46 minutes 52 seconds West 59.39 feet; thence South 00 degrees 00 minutes 21 seconds East 162.40 feet to said north line of REGENT'S POINT; thence South 89 degrees 59 minutes 39 seconds West along said north line a distance of 657.20 feet; thence North 00 degrees 00 minutes 21 seconds West 10.00 feet; thence South 89 degrees 59 minutes 39 seconds West 250.04 feet to the point of beginning. ("Pulte Parcel") The conveyance of the Pulte Parcel is subject to the City's zoning and subdivision regulations that restrict the use and prohibit its development while construction on it without approval by the City Council for the City. Rockport and Pulte have requested of the City that the City Council approve the subdivision of the Pulte Parcel from the property to accommodate the conveyance of the Pulte Parcel. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Apple Valley does hereby approve the subdivision of the Pulte Parcel from the property upon the following condition: No construction shall occur on the Pulte Parcel nor shall development of the Pulte Parcel be permitted without compliance with the City's zoning and subdivision regulations. And in no event shall a residential building be constructed upon the Pulte Parcel prior to the recording or filing of a Plat in the Office of the Dakota County Recorder. ADOPTED this 23rd day of July, 2020. Mary Hamann-Roland, Mayor Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk I - I -- 1 1 F- A Z• -- A - -- - I I -I- 1 1 ^ r- • -1- A r- -I- I IF- • I II I I F H F- IN I I / / I I F- I F H F- II F \/ •\/ F- / / II - - ./ .. .. 1 1 1 L_ /_\ .. 1 , / -+ ./ I 1 1 1 L_ ./ \/ i 1 1 1 V V L_ ./ I 1 \/ -t I I I I L_ r\ -1- 1 1 r- A -' -1- A / / 177 " r- \ -1- r- 1\1 1 I I< I H-IF- / \ I I / / I IF- .- F- I I II I I\I < -1 N 1\1 1 \I F< I F- F- /n\ I I // // I \I F- - F- I \ I II/\I 1\1 NI /< rl 1 V \/ 1 \ 1 1 1 L- l \ ./ 1 1 / -t \/ I ./ L- \/ , 1 ./ 1 V \/ ./ I I ./ I \ I I I L- / \ ., I I / -+ ./ I ./ L- ./ I I ./ 1 . ./ ---NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SEC. 35, T. 115, R. 20 - /-- NE COR. OF THE SE 1/4 ' N89°57'33"E 2656.35 _ N89°57'3311E 125.00 10 C\I O I C\I W 115 f60 - 85 D 0 0 O �1 ct � Z k- w Q N I-o o z. w wz N89°56'46"E__,,' o/ 30 J xo 50.00 N r - - I I Z (jIn I I A I I- - !' 50 50 I \ I I I H < I HH J IW HH / \ I H - I( + -� N / ( 1--- (n I I / \ L _ oo 0 w I1 N I Q 0 0 --J ti CO N I N Mt O ,. . , U, •0 Z r,.- Y zIII Q \ LIJ „I Q 0 ce L1J CC • G a �- o C3) T CO H W I I H - I H H H - - I I I I I H H H - / \ / \ Y Y O ct N LIJ O / I 1 1 1 L \ / \ / \ / 1 1 1 L / \ \ / 1 \ X \ / / \ 1 \ 1 L 1 \ O Ww Q 1"..- z Ir Z CO O Lu CC O � ^ I (Cn // I I I\I I I / J w O 0 = 1 , 1 I \/ I V L/ ./ ^ vJ L 1 J H- I H- -II- iF A . 0 Q n r r 1 -1- 1 /. NI 1 O NORTH EAST 0 Q z , ,' ,_, L, I I I '„ I \ z O NORTH EAST 11.08-�\ 121.46 Q J in N Z Z EAST 594.38 10.00-� 221.60 "1 1- N w O \, / I �N O N/t L71 LL� Nfrl CD L_LL o r N i 7 1 / 1 / A I I / -. N I / t1 -, I- - I \ A I I- \ / / P - I- \ / A I- / '\ / -\ Z / , H - I /I \ I ' Lri K " \ 1 \ / \ / H -,1 1 - \ H < I H - / 1 I N rn � ,1 \ / \ / N V V \ / 0 0 U / w 0 r. /' CO X P (71 - 5 I , 1 L 1 J ,. I I n r. r. \ / 4 PURCHASE PARCEL AREA IN he he Y In `-_ 10 - '.NA '. I /-\ I AI \ I \ ,/, LI -- - I 50 1 50S v-�I --- `-- r n r1--( 1 11,1 , I -. r...-:,-11.1-.11---a.- / I I . I ‘ / \-_, Lii ./ I V / ./ / F- -1I 1F< 1 FF I / /4(. 0) \ -K- ram- T --- 1 \/ \/ I \ I I I o O _ / L 1 J L 1 J "C _ / -- + n r• r• 1 -I- I /ten 1 Zo ___ / I -J _�_ I I I 1 - l CL -J /_\ \ --- // r v\ J r \ _ / \ L/ L/ \/ V / /1) O W L 1 J -_ -_ L-J W Z Q / w L L J / l W ~nY o� 115- / S. LINE QUARRY Q Q LiJ o 60 - - 85 .42 PONDS FOURTH -.\ Li v -► ---P.O.B. ADDITION \ ` / \-NORTH LINE OF REGENT'S POINT � Li x SE COR. LOT 2, BLOCK ,- ! o i " 657.20 1080.87 S89 59 39 W 250.04 1 2 QUARRY PONDS--- ; / S89°59'39"W 1738.07 __ _ ;n FOURTH ADDITION r _ NORTH_ '_ „ ` = I - ;--- I - - 0 - - - - - - - - - �� 157TH STREET WEST _ N89°5913911E, y o PARCEL 8B HWY o i " o 40.00 it I NO. 255190 0 00.00 O 1 i 1 o I EASEMENT PER DOC. N89 59 39 E 622.21 I .; Lni / I r\ r- /\ r- n 1 -1- /-• r\ /\ 1 n 1 -1- 0 NOO°00'21"W I F< F- I , F- I\I F- I 1 1 1\1 I H-60-H --SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF THEw _ i V 1 ., w SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SEC. 35, T. 115, R. 20 / 0 10.00 I I r, r. F- \I 1\1 > /"\ I I 1 1\I I w U O a) i 60 LLI p / z 0 (n I p x w z / > W O w PARCEL 733 Marquette Ave, Ste 700GO LEGAL DESCRIPTION - PARENT PARCEL LEGAL DESCRIPTION - PURCHASE PARCEL Minneapolis, MN 55402 /iiiiiaiiiiiiiiii / /iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii /iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii /iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii /ii /iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii /iiiiiiiiiiiiii /ii /i / ril 612.758.3080 MAIN SPLIT 0 North Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 35,Township 115, Range 20 North, Dakota County, Minnesota, lying That part of the North Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 35,Township 115, Range 20 North, Dakota County, Minnesota, c\l North of the part platted as Regents Point,according to the recorded plat thereof,and except those portions described as follows: A L L I A N T 612.758.3099 FAX / platted as Quarry Ponds Fourth Addition and Quarry Ponds Fifth Addition. Commencing at the southeast corner of Lot 2, Block 2,QUARRY PONDS FOURTH ADDITION,according to the recorded plat thereof, www.alliant-inc.com EXHIBIT X Dakota Count Minnesota;thence North 89 degrees 59 minutes 39 seconds East,assumed bearingalongthe south line of said ENGINEERING AREA: ±3,394,398 SQ. FT.OR 77.92 ACRES y' g aj QUARRY PONDS FOURTH ADDITION,said line also being the north line of REGENTS POINT,according to the recorded plat thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota,a distance of 100.00 feet to the east line of Johnny Cake Ridge Road as dedicated on said plat of 0 QUARRY PONDS FOURTH ADDITION,and the point of beginning;thence North 00 degrees 03 minutes 14 seconds West,along said - 0 east line of Johnny Cake Ridge Road,a distance of 454.31 feet;thence East 594.38 feet;thence North 10.00 feet;thence East 221.60 feet;thence North 11.08 feet;thence East 121.46 feet;thence South 08 degrees 21 minutes 45 seconds West 73.42 feet;thence DRAWN BY DPE E South 01 degrees 08 minutes 28 seconds East 195.53 feet;thence South 22 degrees 46 minutes 52 seconds West 59.39 feet;thence CHECKED BY MPR South 00 degrees 00 minutes 21 seconds East 162.40 feet to said north line of REGENTS POINT;thence South 89 degrees 59 THE SHORES E minutes 39 seconds West along said north line a distance of 657.20 feet;thence North 00 degrees 00 minutes 21 seconds West 10.00 0 50 100 200 DATE ISSUED 7/2/2020 in feet;thence South 89 degrees 59 minutes 39 seconds West 250.04 feet to the point of beginning. SCALE 1"=100' N - SCALE IN FEET APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA JOB NO. 18-0110 AREA: ±429,461 SQ. FT. OR 9.86 ACRES FIELD CREW PG AGREEMENT FOR PRIVATE INSTALLATION OF IMPROVEMENTS Between ROCKPORT,LLC And PULTE HOMES OF MINNESOTA,LLC And CITY OF APPLE VALLEY For THE SHORES AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the City of Apple Valley, a Minnesota municipal corporation, (the "City") has been requested by Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, (the "Developer") to approve and allow the following described installation of improvements for property legally described on Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part hereof(the "Property"), which the Developer desires to subdivide and develop as the plat of The Shores (the proposed plat is attached hereto as Exhibit"B"); and WHEREAS, Rockport, LLC (the "Owner") is the fee owner of the Property; and WHEREAS, the City has agreed to approve and allow the installation of improvements, which are intended to be publicly owned and maintained upon completion and acceptance by the City, on the terms and conditions contained herein; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual agreements of the parties, it is hereby agreed by and between the parties as follows: 1. Conditional Approval. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the City hereby approves the installation of improvements, prior to approval and recording of the plat, on the Property. 2. Improvements The improvement plans for Apple Valley Project 2018-170 (The Shores) (the "Plans") identify sanitary sewer and service stubs and water main and service stubs, (collectively the "Improvements") for development of the Property. Upon completion of the Improvements, and following acceptance by the City and the recording of the final Plat, the Improvements shall be maintained as follows: i) The City shall only be responsible for maintenance of sanitary sewer lines located upon the Property that have a pipe equal to or greater than eight inches in diameter and located within public right-of-way or utility easements. Maintenance of service and lateral lines shall be in accordance with City Policy 2.03 Water and Sanitary Sewer Service Maintenance and Repair Policy Adopted July 8, 2010, per resolution 2010-144. The Developer shall be responsible for 100% of the cost of installation. ii) The City shall only be responsible for the maintenance of water lines located upon the Property that have a pipe equal to or greater than six inches in diameter and located within public right-of-way or utility easements. Maintenance of service and lateral lines shall be in accordance with City Policy 2.03 Water and Sanitary Sewer Service Maintenance and Repair Policy Adopted July 8, 2010, per resolution 2010-144. The Developer shall be responsible for 100% of the cost of installation. 3. Installation. The Developer agrees to install the Improvements in accordance with and under the following conditions: A. To grade the Property in accordance with the Grading Plan on file with the City. B. To install the Improvements, as designed by the City, in accordance with the Plans and in accordance with City standards. C. To install each item noted herein at the Developer's sole cost and expense. D. To attend a preconstruction meeting with representatives of the City and to require the attendance of all contractors and subcontractors, prior to commencement of construction. E. The Developer will not bury any pipe, install bituminous surface or pour concrete without the specific approval of the City Inspector, prior to the work being performed. F. To deliver and to keep in existence with the City a letter of credit or cash escrow in the amount of Three Hundred Fifty Thousand One Hundred Forty-Seven and no/100 dollars ($350,147.00) (the "Financial Guarantee") to secure the performance and payment of the Developer's obligations under this Agreement as they relate to the Improvements. The letter of credit shall be in a form and with terms to the sole satisfaction of the City. Periodically upon Developer's written request and upon completion and verification of satisfactory compliance of any installed Improvements, a like percentage of that portion of the Financial Guaranty covering those specific completed Improvements may be released; except however the final twenty percent (20%) of the Financial Guaranty shall be held until a final acceptance by the City of all Improvements to be maintained by the City. At the time of final inspection of all Improvements, if it is determined by the City that the plans and specifications for the Improvements were not strictly adhered to or that work was done without City inspection, the City may require that the Developer post a cash escrow equal to one hundred twenty-five percent (125%) of the estimated amount necessary to correct the deficiency or to protect against deficiencies arising therefrom. Such additional cash escrow shall remain in force for such time as the City deems necessary, not to exceed five (5) years. G. To pay the City's costs related to the installation of the Improvements and this Agreement, including but not limited to administration, engineering, legal fees and inspection, which the City estimates to be approximately Thirty-Five Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($35,000.00). (The estimate of the City's costs under this Agreement excludes design fees previously paid for the Plans). Such costs shall be paid as follows: i) The Developer shall deposit the sum of Thirty-Five Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($35,000.00) with the City for payment of the City's costs under this Agreement. ii) Upon separate written request from the Developer, not more than one time per month, the City shall submit a written statement to the Developer with detailed descriptions of the City's costs related to the Improvements and this Agreement, and a statement of the balance of the deposit. iii) If the City's costs exceed the deposit, the Developer agrees to reimburse the City within thirty (30)days of billing. If the costs are less than the amount of the deposit, upon completion of the Improvements, the amount remaining on deposit shall be returned to the Developer. H. That any violation of the terms of this Agreement shall allow the City to stop all construction on the Property until authorization to proceed is given by the City. The Developer agrees to hold the City harmless from any damages, causes of action, or claims related to the construction being stopped by the City. 4. Underground. The Developer agrees to install all utilities underground in the Property, specifically including electrical, telephone, cable television and gas services. 5. Completion. Within thirty (30) days after completion of the Improvements, the Developer shall (i) televise the utilities to ensure they have been completed in accordance with the City Code, City Standards and the plans and specifications on file with the City and (ii) give written notice to the City that the Improvements have been completed in accordance with the City Code, City Standards and the plans and specifications on file with the City. The City shall then inspect the Improvements and notify the Developer of any Improvements that do not appear to conform to the City Code,City Standards and/or the submitted plans and specifications. If Developer's Improvements do not conform to the City Code, City Standards and submitted plans and specifications or are later discovered to not conform, the City shall immediately notify the Developer of the need for repair or replacement. Notwithstanding any provision herein to the contrary, the Developer agrees that in case of emergency, the City may cure any default by Developer without prior notice to Developer, and the Developer waives any and all rights to notice of default in such event. Any cost incurred by the City to cure the default shall be the financial obligation of the Developer, and shall be paid to the City within ten (10) days of receipt of an invoice for such costs. 6. Reimbursement. The Developer agrees to reimburse the City for all engineering, administrative and legal costs and expenses incurred by the City in connection with this Agreement or the enforcement thereof. 7. Warranties. Unless a longer warranty period is provided by Minnesota law, the Developer warrants all Improvements required to be performed by Developer, its agents and employees, against poor design, engineering, materials and faulty workmanship for a period of two (2) years after acceptance by the City. Developer shall provide a warranty bond(s), in an amount equal to the cost of the Improvements, for a two (2) year period commencing upon the City's acceptance of the Improvements. The Developer shall be solely responsible for the cost and expense to perform all required repair work to City Standards within thirty(30) days of written notification by the City. 8, Insurance, A. General Requirements: The Developer shall not commence work under this Agreement until it has obtained all insurance required under this Section and shall have filed the certificate of insurance or the certified copy of the insurance policy with the City, and the Developer shall maintain such insurance until the date six (6) months after the City has accepted the Improvements. The Developer shall not allow any subcontractor to commence work on its subcontract until all insurance required for the subcontractor has been obtained. Each insurance policy shall contain a clause providing that it shall not be canceled by the insurance company without ten (10) days written notice to the City of intent to cancel. The Developer shall notify its insurance company in writing that the insurance company must notify the City if it cancels the Developer's insurance. The Developer shall provide a copy of this written notice to the City. Each insurance policy shall contain a clause naming the City as an additionally insured party under the policy. Certificates of insurance shall be submitted on Standard Form C.I.C.C.- 701 or ACORD 25 forms and shall specifically note the clause providing for 10 days written notice to the City of intent to cancel. The certificates of insurance shall also specifically note the clause naming the City as an additionally insured party under the policy. The following minimum coverage shall apply. i) Worker's compensation insurance as required by law. ii) Employer's liability insurance with minimum limits as follows: Bodily Injury By Disease: $500,000 per person Bodily Injury By Disease: $500,000 general aggregate Bodily Injury By Accident: $500,000 general aggregate iii) Contractor's Comprehensive general and automobile liability insurance, including coverage for non-owned and hired vehicles, in limits as follows: General Liability- $1,000,000 each occurrence $2,000,000 aggregate Automobile Liability- $1,000,000 Combined Single Limit for Bodily Injury and Property damage iv) In addition to all listed coverages, Developer shall procure and maintain an Umbrella or Excess liability policy in a minimum limit of$2,000,000. B. Minimum Insurance Requirements: Losses other than those covered by insurance shall be the sole responsibility of the Developer. The insurance requirements as set forth herein shall be considered to be minimum requirements only. Any other insurance that may be necessary to provide adequate coverage must be provided by the Developer at its sole cost and expense. C. Contractual Liability: To the fullest extent permitted by law, the Developer shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents and employees from and against all claims, damages,losses and expenses,including but not limited to attorneys' fees arising out of or resulting from the performance of this Agreement provided that any such claim, damage, loss or expense (1) is attributable to bodily injury, sickness, disease or death, or to injury to or destruction of tangible property (other than the work itself) including the loss of use resulting therefrom, and (2) is caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission of the Developer, any subcontractor, anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable, regardless of whether or not it is caused in part by a party indemnified hereunder. Such obligation shall not be construed to negate, abridge or otherwise reduce any other right or obligation of indemnity which would otherwise exist as to any party or person described in this Section. 9. Owner's Obligations. Owner does hereby acknowledge and consent to the installation of the Improvements by Developer. Owner hereby grants the City and its employees and contractors, an unfettered license to access and be on the Property during the installation of the Improvements. 10. Release. The Developer hereby specifically releases the City and the members of the City Council from any liability in connection with the installation of the Improvements and the handling of funds pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, and further agrees to indemnify and hold the City and the members of the City Council harmless from any claim of any and every nature whatsoever as a result of this Agreement or the installation of the Improvements. 11. Developer Undertaking. The Developer acknowledges that it undertakes the installation of any and all Improvements at its own risk and agrees that: (i) approval of this Agreement does not constitute approval of the Developer's plans for The Shores (the "Development Plans"), which remain subject to approval by the City; (ii) the Developer's obligation to pay the cost of the Improvements is not contingent upon approval of the Development Plans by the City; (iii) this Agreement or the performance thereof by one or more of the parties shall not affect the City's consideration of the Development Plans; and (iv) the Developer may incur additional costs if the City requires revision of the Development Plans and removal or relocation of the Improvements. 12. Assigns. The parties mutually recognize and agree that all terms and conditions of this Agreement shall run with the Property and shall be binding upon the successors and assigns of the Developer. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands. Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC, A Minnesot limited liability company By: �tL Its: a LA►rra16 '16-4-6M STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF l k1NEPrN ) On this LI day of SEClgtenct,frz , 2019, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared l-tt U to me personally, rµu� known, who being by me duly sworn, did say that he/she is thet -a LAN s) 'P"a ' el.41711,all r'T Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC the Minnesota corporation named in the foregoing instrument, and that said instrument was signed on behalf of the company by authority of its managers and acknowledged this instrument to be the free act and deed of the company. "a G- ----- # P : JENNIFER LYNNE MUJWIO.HERRMANN I Notar 11 l Notary esoI Talk y ) r�• ` Minn My Camrnnsslon Expires M 1 . ' Jan 31.2021 Rockport, LLC A Minnesota limited liability company c t350Af By: 5•-�� Its: Y ! • STATE OF MINNESOTA ) {� ) ss. COUNTY OF Bgka ► ) On this SM41 day of SPQ'ierniXr , 2019, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared Ltz ( obs n to me personally known, who being by me duly sworn, did say that he/she is the Vice. Pk:stelae& of Rockport, LLC, the Minnesota corporation named in the foregoing instrument, and that said instrument was signed on behalf of the company by authority of its managers and acknowledged this instrument to be the free act and deed of the company. 70, 1 Y4104/in-� Not y Public ' YVONNE M. MARTIN : NOTARY PUBLIC-MINNESOTA f�. My Commission Expires Jan.31,2020 City of Apple Valley A Minnesota municipal corporation By: Mary Hamann-Roland Its: Mayor By: Pamela J. Gackstetter Its: City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) On this day of , 2020, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared Mary Hamann-Roland and Pamela J. Gackstetter, to me personally known, who being each by me duly sworn, each did say that they are respectively the Mayor and Clerk of the City of Apple Valley, the municipality named in the foregoing instrument, and that the seal affixed on behalf of said municipality by authority of its City Council and said Mayor and Clerk acknowledged this instrument to be the free act and deed of said municipality. Notary Public This instrument was drafted by: Dougherty, Molenda, Solfest, Hills & Bauer P.A. 14985 Glazier Avenue, Suite 525, Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124 (952) 432-3136 /(66-40929) spy.— ��tl-7i s, •r. *a t••W:' . 1 ' :1-1. p"� .. ,..4,.,....',..,d-..,, .:..'•.,.•, r"—� `,j_.. ( ..•4,2i..,.t\,-.)... ,.-i•,1-•,',,l—'..„.'....-.•!.'.1,':-•.'-.,,,.•i. R � :4.s,''i''. .`� \ •♦ �' Y ti.tt j- ,1'• A; `Laic - , 12ND S..T.W � 4 5, , . '' 'I 3RD sr_ • ,,,. ., . ... ,,. . _...... ,....,,., . ,..,,z,_,__. . .., ..---.:,,,,,..\,•.:.,..%.„...,,„6:3,7: .... ,,„ . i, P. :fir i.-L... . ,,:ii, . . ,, ,. ) . e �, 1,1 ! l , �/.. •I",. r'.. ! m; 156TH 3'Tj W' ' , '►ei. Y' _ .�t a . .. �..,155THi5Tr W... ,,," REGATTA 1111• ,xp 1 PARK MI! _ "• —...,.�,j t.E~ l wit 4,i +,�� a� �'" �' y III ry\ 4 x•• Nei,,...,,,,,...........7.,,,K1044, ' .. If y�Q,4� , �1 157,•TH ST/,W,I :':'. 641 4 / nu /111" �\N11r1111 <�� l i. 72 0 �Y r FAIR HIE:WAY•wiii > „�.yirar+11,. :� 4J' 'QUARRY REGENT'S■aw+ •, , - ;‘ -5.0 �� P,.ONDS' �p� QUARRY POINT Z - •c' °5s FSc POINT PARK GG a'r �E -" �'u',' 1 I FIR 1gtLN, CT• WEST. ,58�. 156TH'�ST YV:- .�'; a o t zr ° t)' - FENNEI:CT' • •.e 7 5 . ... • .__ ., . , .. . 4-4--, : .Ticit,...i. .1-.,c)4, . . •. ..: _ i. . r,. ... . _., ,___ . s , . ., _ ., $1..,. -1'7:7's l�r"'�7;iF 1.:"'; ' '7 j` 't. �. . `f , t . THE SHORES / i ,' < < � ,,..1.iniii {�TOWNHOMES . , I -i I, i fl��. -.11rginiritl r AirdfArie----v LOCATION MAP ��1 1Hlkfr; L �iiritt ' .. it —■ *rid- , -1 1 L �� is f.1111111 _ i w E J„ 'l! ��'�I«` I ".1 , , s -- MBC I Did Iiiiiiii • Is ft.,, MBCMI MIL w k 41 • is INN• %i in EMI im • 111!!11!AIi L D IMI �I C Iri►�nIM MIA �n�ir ** ® � ♦ LD 1111 '°''" aVV..**5 n. — r p11,nomilis,--0; i 0 , Elikilik )m14 tH ,pinne illiM MIS 2- dm all I: API taw* 4 *imp ir iffl mil I ilmIP E E m 1 lc *AI a s . ' . m"' . aim gam m 1 EN 11a III THE SHORES fa. ivy 1 TOWNHOMES �~--' /`+ °mi l� ► irtwrs i V yam_.. 't __`f ��� CURRENT �`` c��=" t` r � �• COMPREHENSIVE L-,�� �a :,t � li17. PLAN DESIGNATION . 5t �.-=' �!`,,,,,L'' ' , `ro,.,2 NIkir;-ir/�'_� ��• girt, f. "LD" (Low Density Residential) 4� r ����n-� and ��-��� ma_��� 1 "HD" (High Density Residential) wisift - rB 1= i� .. = 1::: Imi maw: A WINO Alp : LD C I. plW MI it it •. LD1 40 6 silik-....k de NW -, t Pfti3 1: lli - ins® � an No r � �.1 MM I. . id riiiiiii 121 e �� gird�,>I ' �- A, t.1///I -. 4% ms :1 P M FL , IS s. ill im no . %Am .................... al am 4.11 E 1 , Alk Impolmirmiim II - t1II Anril iii 111 Ili _ 111A1111111 NORTH THE SHORES 6 {rr T - - 4, TOWNHOMES T"�' r .i�ctior , ot- � fill PROPOSED I " COMPREHENSIVE S:,�k.y h iifklt:.iii>>i`-�. PLAN DESIGNATION , , g1s4,1��+��'��' KnIiLKA MD (Medium Density Residential) aM 't � ill—_. P lic:114:41A1111)) ' ig1.1 Sc - - _J_11 LL Q - -- f - LL 7 6 P D,(oz L. . x.x.x..„.:.:.:.„):.:.:.:.*:.:.:.x.:.:0 , 0,§, , _ „___ ---I...( ,_ ;K;K:K:K:I:ig:Ki.§:iei:K:K:K:i:K:if, ,,_ ---1-1'.'i 7 s,„„..„........,---. -?/\ ,,, ._,.. . ^ 11 PD-975 = I I ( / (17.1 Pr THESHORES '�.�� ,r r`, a F HOMES -�. < ..-c,-..i.--_..,,,z4,:, I.- , . . , P` : ' • '.. •••:. '`: iilIr. . . r .r., fill •., r• i, _ '',1 rk ‘..„1 A..- -. 1. t t ZONING MAPar : -�,_Ygi L. . �. -p "SG" (Sand and Gravel i ';`� � I_ ' '� - L. ' - - \ A SG r SG 1 UI `"V I 12 , �__ ,> 1 �z I y af > ,. _ SITE ________§116 ,c X L _� / ����� - — _ IF II Illik ----- All m I \0\ ------, ' —71_11 ii N -�l} 7rA--. 1 �!1` (--�I� �; � � i �4�� THE SHORES rT ` '�{ ` srAI y' rim_ 11„... i ir IF , _ : 1".0 ZONING MAP : _ . .- I., ... 010 I- • _.: �,n- .VII . "M-6C" (Multi-Family 1124,j ,. �R '` 4.. Residential/6-12 u.p.a.) =�,,,�r;=,- ft4 I kV UN - TEMPORARY DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT OVER ALL OF OUTLOT M NO°00'00"E 11.08'--ti N30"00'00•E 121.46 NO°00'00"E 10.00'- S9o"00'o0'E 221.80' $ F _A OUTLOT M S90°00'00"E 594.38' .1 MAO' $'• 9noa' n N9a00'00•W OB52' 'Q 990'00'p0'E _ �,a Lam, ALLIANT �r 30.IY 4.78411 f1-72,0IT TEMPORARY DRAINAGE AND UTILITY +.07'•• N w r $ '�' a7A0' r. n a•2r44'23• x+ c ENGINEERING EASEMENT OVER ALL OF OUTLOT L aa.aa' a9.00 I r y*19Ore0-N sgwcvGR•E 07,00' 4gW00•E 57A0' n �._ 1 OUTLOT L t84a' ,g g $ to0.ESO I$ [7��yl ry _ n .-1 a cr 3' 733 Marquette Avenue L=8.B2'II-28.07_j SBG'S5'R5.77 iB.65' ,f{p 580•e5'46'eI 14 N n N 25,4' SB959'39•W 377.33' DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EABEMENTc S9oG790•E 57,ar s47o0'OOT 57.00' 8- a a 15'SY06= $ L-1692'R-2B00' b. r• 0UTLOT G W 8 IN 3 Suite 700 0 •"e-34a7'2B• y i sa9s0'enW '�R�b• N901ff3.C,34.00 rre.OVER17A►1_OF OUTLOT C $ g.$ Np1 $g $$ m $ 1- -Z- ;•^s980.707e6 -t Minneapolis,MN 55402 SB9'S6'46•W89.09' 4. Ai, 76. a+sT eft zs.0d -z2otl-nar tzar nar 23.00' zs.0o' 7zas' z207 nano• zzoo' zso0 N I1 IT ne f 8 ni.od' U STORM �+ [ 1 deems P ssowoa'E t 1 mnararE g ❑ $ 612.758.3080 f r s69x4a e n7o7r S+� 8 8 8 a o $ k $ $ 8 g g S7,ar O k g V a7.07 0 r ly `^_E p TREATMENT www.alliant-inc.com v ,� „ BLOCK 7 „ BLOCK 8 ,Di g Di g $ to $ °D D $ NB9.56'45•E 57 00' ? 1; 2 3 f 4 P 5 N 6 t P 1 t 2' 3 p 4 ;5 P 6 ; D to^' W o �OT607E 57-00' PON D N G BY Z .H 13 `t 8 s $ $ $ $ $ t5 $ $ 8 y s9onapoa5zo7 a � g sacrg4oE si.9c g :�o ail v Ygl OTHERS) I/1 SBB'5B'48'W 5]-00' 48 0 C•, z z 1 n o o e g e•1 r S9m90'00•E 57.00' o 4$ a--1 N b$ NB9'S6'48•E 57.00' >+. yi00. 22-00. R7.g7_ 2740 77.OG 2.00' 2500' 22Aa' 22.00' 77_GO' 22 Kr 250d -- jDW Fq7 •� �G' I SBO'00'00•E 57-00'n SP60r/p0`E 5)OV ns� n cc 7 t.1 saG'35'45•w �j m O - NdS'79'7YE 136.W' N09'S9'J9'E 176.00' OUTLOT H F� g<< F - ,onTLOT K ea-E s,oc t.w g a $1� 3� P$00. /Il� J w g 0 57.0a' b n y r N Na9'Sn�-[(� N= r L 554'59.39•N 2sl.w' sao•oo'oo•E 57.00' Z� 5OGnvc00•K 57.05' V•W $ $ +Li DRAINAGE AND�j N Y Ln1 Q p..1a DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT II// Z k n 03 2 N s g N J $i 5 c� 00' ''6 OVER ALL OF OUTLOT C OUTLOT C Z 10 g ri 4 g UTILITY EASEMENT sa9•s5.4c�r 57.00' f m ty yt .wa $ •S S a 590'00'00•E 5]-00' �s C '�. NdB'S9']9•E 14490' r•I W 5, - - A fi c0 n fi CO BY ATTACHEDOTHERS Q - $ pg NBt64'44'C 57.CC 9+ 15' 6020'2I•W 7fl.0r 9901:000T 57AP Q S9000'00•E 57.00' 8$ rH g c%, A 6 '� yr HW164'39T+3a DC d z b 0 ry r„ EXHIBIT) O 4 1n s69•58'erW 57.oa t P. p- $ $aP SPo D[ m 0'NBB'S8'46•E 57.00'n 5.pV4,a• i u5aS9'39T 4Es07 xRab' 2200' xxv0' 22.l10' 22.otr _ M.aro $ [y r-1 `o CC $ t.y m $. H t, s9Gmm'C� w IJl ez Too $ $ f fis9e7aooE p; o �s9rw'oot t 0 S 57.ar ❑ 8 a % Nerse'4a•c 57.a0' p N8954'43i�_5005'1a E r 4 & f t f f $ f C s szoo' O $$ S ❑ 57.00 S erl Z FE g $ $ 1- 2a00 _ 1744' "1`4A ' ' tiff d r F 6:r 5 BLOCK 31� 2 1 a 0 m m 0 mH 0 $s9rnu a67.od 8 W N fi O ¢} r i 1.Ot',i '' A.4 •a i e r�Q g c S90'00'00•E 57.00' S40T10'00•E 37-00' T r. QN5Y58'44•E 57W • IN r p,.q,Q' Q!. a� 'b• yc.py 720d' 02.0' 77.00' _[200' 7A00'= g13 - 59U00'OD'E 5]00' P+1 rV t^ �• .� �� d • 4 �E. 0 AI7RAINAGE AND UTi ITY �9�138.ar 590'00'00•E 57.00'an 590'00'00•E S]-p0' 8a } 13 Id 8 S16.1•FT 1r_. 1 4aA sd Kry `%. t3 �.4 ,EASEMENT OVER ALL OU 1 I g °�. Qbp 61 �n� $ OF OU11OT I N]aaot3w2oa1-• Z t [�Nlrx4ac f 2aoo ,1. 1/� 3 �Prl Z O 57°C ��ro 4 .� 13022' 44.0r B&BO' rg< >Rl = mm 8 4' , A •{ . '�� & NOAV1A'EMOD' P ' A/0. STORM WATER O Yl * "' Os e>J',�"n Na. °e• , .3 1r 7 OUTLOT J DRAINAGE AND UTILITY ilk' , �„{� 9'' J, y EASEMENT OVER ALL OF l nr 4 MANAGEMENT N6956'46-E 57.00" ,ys 4 ? r, `C IP g Na9D9',137 115A0' RP05a'0 5 Peal a' 'il 8 V g PS s0 1c ,y g S OUTLOT J >'a, 4§:. if J yti � ; Y Thaw 22m la9a 72ar 734d sear 2xar 22 CO ia.ar �� (BY OTHERS) n N595B'66•E 57.00'n i'� *10' 'k l h1 $ $ 8 $ g 6 Z DRAINAGE AND UTILITY �' v- $ O rr i1 � 4 �7°'e+ N e'+' O EASEMENT OVER ALL OF "%• �.a'° ya1,,, G, f 4.�q, . BLACK 13 r BLOCK 14 t } ,� $ e> ��� $ H LL. OUTLOT B ALL ? 4 $ Seen,sa w n 1 f 2 3 s 4 F.N 5 n f 1= 2 T 3 4 �v.a- $ A C a' fi.2 �y OUTLOT F %E • _ 8 $ a-2 ,x„ az`opolbe�. �¢ $sro-l CO co- _ L O0,,0I I 26.W 21Afi 21A0' :27.06 25 W 20.Da' 00.00' n-ar 2Q00' S89A34.w .6T4 4t fi � A ''4j�' I H O y A ! eaana'Sr 1 50020J4c 110,0 N5a5y'3nY 9r.no' ti 440 P' der p �• L' 40 �-L-21.u' L.15.3a' '`-9B75o'30•W 3.05' , � ' t[♦� ,g C M 4•t3'a02a• 11.71.00'-" •'s 579'S9'19'W 247-4Y L- g' L-4.53' d2,� N d 549'58'08'W -• o 0-1794'2Y •-NO'O0;{t'W R0.00r SGv rint Yana'-f R. 77' "R`144.EC Q A-1'4NIp 0 ww �' `'4 H'; t.'" Q �,d /.'-S H.rm DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT l IR-'aa•-7.; 4. F V1 4� � ,¢ �'a b. �44e, 2i32. r9't° OVER ALL or ou6�s�azJ�MeT,LOTA yarunR' , � k DRAINAGE AND UTILITY b Z • O 3,P y fi � %'I,1>1',•, e $ Rr °8.G7' '' EASEMENT OVER ALL OF 't CO C np n1)' r y ss. , 4, 0•' -Po' �y�'NB9'SB'39•E 13E00' NNR'59'39Y t78.00' OUTLOT K fp 0 •.. f•) �9-• y 0 R'A `� y 7fir$ 9 40q I 25.00' 22.00' 22.00' 2200' 7.00• t1p1' SSCO' MOO' Y7.00' 22.W' '2207 ISM' 'w >- 4T `�Vf._ "99.. V Y 3 4N Ei- Y $ g g P 8 8 $ $ 8. t P$ k $ 8. • +7, O UTLOT K Q VI 4 a �6 " �c ^ ':� J ��ic 8(�f�? � r r 6 t r q � t 2 t t t 4 Kt"' 2 1n P 1a �� a n as + 2 3 5„ 3 r~ i - 5 3 ] 4j o N O �� 9 , &� " P o BLOCK 211I _ BLOCK 20 Vi Z Z O 0. 1 DRAINAGE AND UTLTY EASEMENT P+.pp. � 25.07 2200' 22-00' 2200' 9000' -MOO' D 26.0' .n00' 22.00' 22.00' 2k.00' 2500' U) 1 re re OVER ALL OF OUTLOT F • NBB'59'39•E 135.00' HI1959'34T 13407 1 J DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT -- - 71a11aa-E 7m' CC w Q Q OVER ALL OF OUTLOT E N0•o0'21•W7.99- -- 0 Z Z OUTLOT E L-131z'R-27:er__ -- t+13.21'ReSEATJ S89°59'39"W 250.04' 4 2NN3'34 -;7 50.5p _a eter,7a' I Q 2_ 2_ ez9.w r N0°00'21"W 10.00"---- I 1 (n c NBY5�39'E&57.20' J �� pt31'( ,4 I as CC CC og�O* ' Ik [ I- a a 0. I I ` n'` I`' • I 157TH STREET WEST [y_ I '�{Z•` "13GT�' I hereby certifyrlhal thin plan, :r G , 1+�� ppr or o I unnder m EVERGLADE AVENUE r ,�[y1A t7O preparediret aupervlslon and that ly • am duly Licensed Z. 1 [.t01 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under } I the IGHe of the Ste.of MINNESOTA REGENTS POINT REGENTS POINT SECOND ADDITION w • > • _ MARK RAUSCH,PE R PARCEL AREA TABLE PARCEL AREA TABLE PARCEL AREA TABLE PARCEL AREA TABLE PARCEL AREA TABLE PARCEL AREA TABLE PARCEL AREA TABLE PARCEL AREA TABLE PARCEL AREA SF AREA AC PARCEL AREA SF AREA AC PARCEL AREA SF AREA AC PARCEL AREA SF AREA AC PARCEL AREA SF AREA AC PARCEL AREA SF AREA AC • PARCEL AREA SF AREA AC PARCEL AREA SF AREA AC LEGEND: N Date License No. Si B1-L1 1,425 0.03 B4L3 1,254 0.03 B7-L6 1,425 0.03 B11-L7 1,425 0.03 B13-L5 1,425 0.03 B77-L3 1,254 0.03 B20-L6 1,425 0.03 OUTLOT E 32,759 0.75 PROPERTY LINE QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL •_ - LOT LINE B1-L2 1,254 0.03 B4L4 1,425 0.03 B8-L1 1,425 0.03 B11-L2 1,254 0,03 B14-L1 1,425 0,03 B17-L4 1,425 0.03 B21-L1 1,425 0.03 OUTLOTF 54,351 1.25 - -- -- R.O.W BY DATE 0. ... S FOUND IRON MONUMENT 61-L3 1,254 0.03 B5-L1 1,425 0.03 0842 1,254 103 B11-L3 1,254 0.03 B1442 1,254 0.03 B1841 1,425 0.03 B2142 1,254 0.03 OUTLOTG 14,875 0.34 DATE ISSUE 11-6-18 CRY SUBMITTAL B1-L4 1,425 0.03 B542 1,254 0.03 BB-L3 1,254 0.03 B11-L4 1,254 0.03 B14-L3 1,254 0.03 B78-L2 1,254 0,03 B21-L3 1,254 0.03 OUTLOT H 9,962 0.23 12.19-18 COY RE-SUBMITTAL - _ - L B2-L1 1,425 0.03 B5-L3 1,254 0.03 B8-L4 1,254 0.03 B11-L5 1,254 0.03 B14-L4 1,425 0.03 B1843 1,254 0.03 621-0.4 1,254 0.03 OUTLOTI 13,674 0. 0 20 40 BO 31 1-10-79 POND 13EStOM UPDATE 1: _ _ _ 0242 1,254 0.03 B5-L4 1,425 0,03 B8-L5 1,254 0.03 B11-L6 1,425 0.03 B1541 1,425 0.03 B1844 1,425 0.03 02145 1,254 0.03 OI/TLOTJ 27,751 0.64 I I SCALE IN FEET B2-L3 1,254 0.03 13641 1,425 0.03 OR-L6 - 1,425 0,03 B12-L1 1,425 0.03 B15-L2 1,254 0.03 B19-L1 1,425 0,03 B21-L6 1,425 0.03 l OUTLOTK 34,452 0.79- _ - PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 0244 1,425 0,03 B6-L2 1,254 0.03 0941 1,425 0.03 B12-L2 1,254 0.03 B15-L3 1,254 0.03 B19-12 1,254 0,03 B2241 1,425 0.03 OUTLOTL 20,395 0.47 r - - That part of the North Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 35,Township 115,Range 20 North,Dakota County,Minnesota, 63-L1 1,425 0.03 B6-L3 1,254 0,03 B9-L2 1,254 0.03 B12-L3 1,254 0.03 B15-L4 1,425 0.03 B19-L3 1,254 0.03 B22-L2 1,254 0,03 OUTLOTM 2,400 0.06 described as follows: ' • - Commencing at the southeast corner of Lot 2,Block 2,QUARRY PONDS FOURTH ADDITION,according to the recorded plat thereof, PROJECT TEAM DATA B342 1,254 0.03 B644 1,425 0.03 B9-L3 1,254 103 B12-L4 1,254 0.03 B16-L1- 1,425 0.03 B19-L4 1,425 0.03 - ry B22-L3 1,254 0.03 TOTAL 429.461 9.86 Dakota County,Minnesota;thence North 89 degrees 59 minutes 39 seconds East,assumed bearing along the south line of said DESIGNED: MPR B3-L3 1,254 0.03 B7-L1 1,425 0,03 69-L4 1,425 0.03 B12-L5 1,425 0.03 B16-L2 1,254 0.03 B20-L1 1,425 0.03 B2244 1,425 0.03 QUARRY PONDS FOURTH ADDITION,said line also being the north line of REGENTS POINT,according to the recorded plat thereof, DRAWN: ELL - - Dakota County,Minnesota,a distance of 100.00 feet to the east line of Johnny Cake Ridge Road as dedicated on said plat of PROJECT NO: 218-0110 ' B3-L4 1,254 0,03 B742 1,254 0.03 B10-L1 1,425 0.03 613-L1 1,425 0.03 B16-L3 1,254 0.03 B20-L2 1,254 0.03 OUTLOT A 21,406 0.49 QUARRY PONDS FOURTH ADDITION,and the point of beginning;thence North 00 degrees 03 minutes 14 seconds West,along said •i - east line of Johnny Cake Ridge Road,a distance of 454.31feet;thence East 594.38 feet;thence North 10.00 feet;thence East - B3-L5 1,425 0.03 B7-L3 1,254 0,03 B10-L2 1,254 0.03 B13-L2 1,254 0.03 B16-L4 1,425 0.03 B20-L3 1,254 0.03 OUTLOT B 34,068 0.78 22160 feet;thence North 11.08feet;thence East 12146 feet;thence South 08 degrees 21minutes 45 seconds West 7342 feet; - - thence South Ol degrees 08 minutes 28 seconds East 19553 feet;thence South 22 degrees 46 minutes 52 seconds West 59.39 feet; 3 B4-L1 1,425 0.03 67-L4 1,254 0.03 B10-L3 1,254 0.03 B13-L3 1,254 0.03 B17-L1 1,425 0.03 B20-L4 1,254 0.03 OUTLOT C 19,352 0.44 thence South 00 degrees OO minutes 21 seconds East 162.40 feet to said north line of REGENT'S POINT;thence South 89 degrees 59 - minutes 39 seconds West along said north line a distance of 657.20feet;thence North 00 degrees 00 minutes 21 seconds West B4-L2 1,254 0.03 B7-L5 1,254 0,03 B10-L4 1,425 0.03 B13-L4 1,254 0.03 617-L2 1,254 0.03 B20-L5 1,254 0.03 OUTLOT D 9,637 0. 10. 23 1 L 00 feet thence South 89 degrees 59 minutes 39 seconds West 25004feet to the point of beginning SHEET 3 of 14 / TEMPORARY HAMMERHEAD 1 , TEMPORARY BIT / EASEMENTHAMMERHEAD � CONNECT TO' 1 PED FUTURE$' TRAIL RAMPS I I • N---) OUTLOTM I • ALLIANT '� ;o i' SIDEWALK(TYP) F N OUTLOT L e • .wotleaaetMa' • N 1 U N OUTLOT L RMfP r rl + t0'TRAIL • PED ,., T - et I. •� 733 Marquette Avenue t.laD RAMPS n N ra+Do l 3+00 21 �� „tie, � ■I d 3T ( ) j • Suite 700 n R�q 8� _ T ■ OUTLOT G 1 rv� I a Minneapolis,MN 55402 _ l: wF ^I� 11uI F� I t.r. � _. ' I r I m 1 13' • I 612.758.3080 8612 MG _• • : ^• ... p l [ •■ . I Q I STORM • , www.alliant-inc.com �� 11 r 881x CM , BLCi MK 7 a3 �' O m �. m CO i{� REATMENT • • cH 1 I12 �f`` g 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 a �r m I co I la —T- ]i PINDING(BY • + ' .�i. 1 I l I �.T-. _ z, 9'SIDEWALK IN FRONT OF . r ! p! I I ' i{.._, OTHERS) • • •! r-I !!! iI� - --• - ••- "'PARKING STALLS(TYP.) -- v `••' ^i- I. NiI .� i ---- MOUNTABLE C&G , x, I■ II 1 m al r MOUNTABLE C&G OUTLOT H OUTLOT K 1 it• Y I M 'nu �.o�■ .1.1 -N .. OUTLOTJ -78'DRIVEWAY TYP J I TIA11119 llAr I. COm ❑ — �T z+� A - ....� A.yT PED RAMP + ..]. �- --- r f! MOUNTABLE C&G J1 Q �+ • • - I N I>7 I "I =Mr ll i B612 C&c H DDs'OUTLOTC ! r NEE I *-1 ` .� '�1 - -14�. ------ - B812 CAG '' 'I• J . 121 2 � I l RAMPS m - - y$ '�� --,t '-_I 1,-.1: - .:r I H • �� rV NIGHT _ T= g �" PED i ■' ]GAND co I O I DRAINAGE TURN-LANE �F ,'� 0. a: - i RAMP } ^" I ■ UTILITY (9Y OTHERS)— / ., I --. - F I _ PED , , .. 1111 $ 6 5 4 2 1 I m as ! m'v i — 00 i ■ EASEMENT ,� i Olil ti O EE CONNECT TO 7 E •1 _-' OI C&G RAMPS S r,�E. ..___..• BLOCK 11- , f a �-1 1 '.. f Mill ` OTHERS FUTURE B' TRAIL �� Q � '� • �..'• .� ti,•� - — p_1-r�:.::n! '=� I (j ATTACHED O 2 m 1! �g4, ��D� �� Doti, OuTLO' I 43 �_ a. ', ..� 1 EXHIBIT) H • •, 1 ,� `• ,, — ^. . ._ f�l Is ....Pm RAMPS ■ g I• mm I ._ - ` ~ i' SIDEWALK (TYP) - • `'7�- Ly InC&G� OUTLOTJ�' l -. � •• BLACK 13 JBOIK14• 2 3 4 5 o • MOUHTAB��,�' . PED .. .-_ ... a_s• J !! +, ■ H O O _ G �'• •i i RAMPS---- • T I� •L - •a / ■ +4 gg12 MOUNTABLE C&G r/-• N T f '�� ft 5' / '. B61 1.i -a11_I _. f! - • S 1 7 F I ■ J 7 7:CON EC r _ - . .._ .-. _ - — —y''^ �':� ■ H O TO FUTURE •�, 8' TRAIL a 'r `lir �• - s�0o- 1 9,1u° ,I a•r q• I ■ kei • ROAD B_ OUTLOT A 2 _ O J� I f 3 D, RAMP 041, - _ _. •', SIDEWALK CO O a , .� r .F �� `� —�1- AIAPESD \• , to ■ MINIM! R t cc¢ I s LPED �� 4!to/ I••-' ,' OUTLOTK �'"'.......'. F II -1() RAMP,' r♦ B� 6 4 2 + 10'TRAIL(TYP) L— — 5 3 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 w d BLO1 K 20 B612 MD- z Z 8' BIT TRAIL i �' •_ BLOCK 21 1 y t r. • 4' SIDEWALK (TYP) �.. .� - •1 — — — — 'I W Ce • CONNECT TO I w Z Z EXISTING BIT TRAIL EXISTING BIT TRAIL $ P t.a,, J JJQ CONNECT TO A SIDEWALK(TYP) I EXISTING BIT TRAIL OUTLOT E �� _ .� J CONNECT TO TRAIL y > a • p f5(' I PIS W W W = a rc F- Ln :+epj� _ F•- a d rn Li 157TH STREET WEST MATCH E7AST1IkO PED RAMPS L-] 1 i ' I hereby certify}hat }hie plop, specification,o report was r _ - _ direct supervision and that I prepared by der my Iarn a duly Licensed �) . -- - - PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under the lows of the Stole of m MINNESOTA • REGENTS POINT REGENTS POINT SECOND ADDITION MARK RAUSCH,PE GENERAL SITE DATA: SITE PLAN NOTES: _ LeIEaT W a, PO-01-03500-75-014 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY THE 6. PAVEMENT STRIPING SHALL BE 4 INCH I S1I Er••E-., CONCRETE mi. uana.Na OUTLOT LINE BACK OF CURB " I1P�` SIDEWALK ROAD QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING WHITE. PARKING STALLS SHALL BE A MIN, - EXISTING TONING= SG -SAND k GRAVEL UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES, 9' WIDE AND 20' DEEP. Moan I •Ewalt SUCH AS EXISTING GUTTER GRADES AT d,rr r- plirtN • PROPOSED ZONING=MB- 6-12 UNfTS ACRE THE PROPOSED STREET CONNECTIONS, 7. ALL WORK WITHIN THE R.O.W. STALL > u MIN.mu). , aR1AlKous !" ' - . `•• [INSET PRIOR TO THE START OF SITE GRADING- zap AAYaar 1R MIN.(TURF) s'!'.:•:', DATE COMPLY WITH CITY ENGINEERING DESIGN �1 s3o�1■ aRR Etas ... Af Br • THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY • r ` - I - A�• WflB STOPNV y;'n ea 4 waa BATE ISSUE 2030 LAND USE-f{D - HM.H DENSITY RE51DfNrlL[1Tt UNRS/ACRE) NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY STANDARDS. F 1 . �'i Fr Cartrt,n,i�r. 1 It-F18 C[I1'RE -RI SUBMITTAL = DISCREPANCIES OF VARIATIONS FROM THE B, ALL STREET SIGNAGE, PUBLIC&PRIVATE 9 —e•coact .o�am 12-10-18 CRT RE-SUBMIIYAt. PROPPSE➢LAND USE- MD- MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDL7tTIAL[6-SR.1JHfTS/AGRE) PLANS. SHALL COMPLY WITH THE MN NAkUAL OR ' '^- cns BAB -Y.a�.la�rt Wax wvss — 'xe + 1_ltl_1 ppNp B�IG11 UPDATE UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES. En .T.r.amm PROPOSED UNITS - 105 -- �!" `•"�• PHONE PHONE waaa.�`Ancrt'`ss y " GROSS �= B88 2. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF BB'( UNIT) CAry • CATV BUILDING AND/OR BACK OF CURB. 9. "NO PARKING FIRE LANE"SIGNS MUST sAN SEWER Set IMPERVIOUS AREA-5.16 AC (52.51L) BUILDING DIMENSIONS REFER TO OUTSIDE COMPLY WITH CITY ORDINANCE.THERE IS PAVEMENT SECTIONS BUILDING COVERAGE- 7A 7X OF STADING PAS MP) UNLESS NO PARALLEL PARKING ALLOWED ON 25' 22' . ]NM[TI NOT To scut OTHERWISE NOTED- PRIVATE ROADS, END LOT WIDTH TYP LOT WIDTH TYPICAL PRIVATE ROAD SECTION(24'F-F) SIDE YARD PRIMARY STRUCTURE SETBACKS: 3. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR 10.ALL CURB AND GUTTER TO BE CONCRETE L. .6-SIDE YARD LOT UNE NW 10 7C.i[ N CONCRETE STOOPS ADJACENT TO B612 OR MOUNTABLE TYPE AS NOTED, ' LOT UNE LEGEND: 11 (1,�4"T MPR • EAST LOT UNE - 25" PROPOSED BUILDING. PER COY STRNLWRDS, � T3SY'ppp PROJECT TEAM DATA NORTH LOT UNE _ 25' I T3' -- -- EASEMENT LINE .� y�� DESIGNED: ELL JOHNHY CAKE RIDGE ROAD i0' 4. CONTINUOUS CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER Ti.ALL SIDEWALK IS 4' WIDE, EXCEPT AT THE �,�.,,J a DRAWN: ELL 7C 187TH STREET WEST - AO' WHICH CHANGES TYPE SHALL HAVE A MIN. BACK OF THE PARKING AREAS THEN 5' - — — _ fl� Y�[1t� D� t -L BUILDING SETBACK rC [i�{� ‘)G[>< FIVEO FOOT(5')TRANSITION ON PRIVATE WIDE. �� PROPERTY LINE ^' �1 T51v' PROJECT No: 216-01 70 PRIVATE ROAD WIDTH .24'FACE-PAGE ROADS. ••--� `�{, C DRIVEWAY DEPTH- 22'MIN.(22'--26'RARO£) 5. ALL CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER LOT LINE [� ADJACENTA TBY CONCRETE 2 INCHWALK EXPANSION TYPICAL REAR OT LINE — -•.• — ROW ` „0 �Q / TYPICAL TOWNHOME LOT DETAIL 0 20 40 80 4 '= JOINT. To mw_E /� SIGHT LINE TRIANGLE �� I,/ SCALE IN FEET SHEET 4 of 4 l- 7,7-BERM GRACING AS 9 * i• �'.. 6 REQUIRED IN MINE C.U.P. "' v� 1 • 11\r, 9s6 • + �. ALLIANT - y-� ' 9S` i EHOINEERINO L.----9'- 76 �' assj 733MarquetteAvenuex ° e �i0 Suite 700 w t� I Minneapolis,MN55402j • 4, I • t 612.756.3060 tso • r www.alliant-inc.com s41 + ' QT �� �� �TSM fr s "itt. 1T00 2 3+00 � �r.I.-...:�, . ____ .. M I V _ 0 no I f tF---� - Rnp7g - �cl' r_ �� Pi: i■ ._ ■ 0�i��■�� ■_ ■ :`^ �,nt; .I. Q ll r: rv`"rr• I I 100-YR ■ ....-_ .� �` , r�, •_ _ �- :_._ glj'i I .me N]G°7i, �I :q m m{ �4� ; WL 435.7 + I 1341l,Jri/i:.1 .. y 1 H O9�T . ,. REAR 946.5 ' '-1 - --- •xg i. i �-m Imo' m ��d 1 STORM r ` s �• a BLOCK 7 �} !� 4 a II :!' I ' ' : I. 1 m"aa; 1 1 2 3. 4 5 6 1 2 Y ' ■ I • cF 94�0 I +.R ''I ��+a I 1 +r CC .� i �_ �1111 r �� �:� L. :�..-�•�. a F �LOT K Tq •. 2 'CO rm 1 Q"+ �� ' 1 _ 2ROp - S.pO �^ i P 0 ,, I+■■ i f Ili m� A RI•I Q, OUTLOT C 9Aa• 11: le 1• •'' IH �� ■Ir. Q 11 �r NJ_� 1i I .. _ ■I��ar�I� ' T I [ II `�1 II y ,r y�� I ,4 i '.""-- j i, 44. CD 42. • I ��dr � c �L'P►i_,� - (jFE _!m - 'tali �•� Y m � Q / w is n1.�-Y� ' • ��5 � mat .ry' I ' � ` I' � �� � • st • F• '�,,... `® A 6--Y R� R E rim jill: aye r NM 01 : AIM , FMN I I a, , ni i'14) JJ is A�11 fl �.48 I i Ism ._ AS°plill �� ■1�1�� �I` 1' + STORMWATER Z ,?i'ri— �I -I� 1 ,I�� te► 1- MANAGEMENT 4 .1- , .'ir' -- 4* ` �' i 1;1 II o i (BY OTHERS) a Tfi ` �' +4 1' Fla +,7 • W Q $43,6 ><. �i�yr• :�i .f t .,} T 1112,5,2,-11 \ • '�•' 1 +lam;' ••� --•- .. A • Ce C1 OJ +. L$ •',�., •ey �� _ 'Y.6 1- . �.0 '' ; c �- llril 9P] fir. ,` rrj d ! N Z Q HP. � 11 . :00 .�! x '45di8HPif 111 g LE } MM" Y 4u. - ..' 1 .. . '. ^� :sty• a4? ii - i60 1 - r T CO 5 cc Z 1 in • GFE :AS.5i'. •D" I L1T I.0. art„ ` W W▪ a -,_. A 5 4 3 5 s 4 z 1 H a s C7— — 1 BLO4K2 $Li]1 ► a • ., i� -REAR 845.5 7i.F9R.' _ _ 1' _ �' _ • ,,,ram -- 1 • I hereby certify Lhal this plan, .•TfXy' 8 4 _ ..... __ ._. _-.. __ _._ .5 speclflcall°n report w as -s . 1 me or _ ---• - _ •� tip :.y ". .� _ prepared Ir supervision by andnlh°I ly POND GRADING a dulyLicensad - - + OUT LOT E H } \ / A4 57TC I (BY OTHERS) PROFESSINAL ENGINEER under L - y. I 1� •''•,`. / The laws of the S1au DI •. IQ, MINNESOTA 'JOHNNY CAKE RIDGE - • - o*a'4�� u� NY SC • •11...9. MARK RAUSCH,PE ROAD GRADING/ELEVATION157TH STREET WEST Dale n�, cTO BE IN ACCORDANCE I- WITH CITY DESIGN PLAN. E 157TH STREET WEST - OUAUTY ASSURANCE/CONTROL �p ..�J�,. _ _ _ STORMWATER NOTES. PAD WIDTHS=4 UNIT=88' BY DATE t \ • 1 ,I s UNIT=132• DATE ISSUE EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA . 0.00 AC GRADING NOTES: A-GROSS H0. ts' It-ESB WIT SUBMITTAL e-WEAL RESPRFAD 5' PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS U ��,� ' o-rR:r MI LW 17-IS-1 TY RE-SUIL[TTAL COMPOSITE CURVE NUMBER(CN) BS 1-fO-f1 POND DESIGN DTy,1,TE }_ ALL FINISHED GRADES SHALL SLOPE AWAY FROM PROPOSED BUILDINGS AT MINIMUM GRADE OF �� 1�4 0.PAD DEM s UNIT.sT 2.0%.ALL SWALES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM SLOPE OF 2.00%. 9, IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING GRADING OF(3:1 OR GREATER)SIDE SLOPES AND DRAINAGE SWALES, vx„.4 ✓� ' RUNT.ST • GRADING LEGEND: 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP THE ADJACENT ROADWAYS FREE OF DEBRIS AND PREVENT THE• WOOD FIBER BLANKET OR OTHER APPROVED SOIL STABILIZING METHOD(APPROVED BY ENGINEER) R aN E.GARAGE SLIeAa aY Mx FRw eA«ar CURB OFF-SITE TRACKING OF SOIL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY AND SHALL BE APPLIED OVER APPROVED SEED MIXTURE AND A MINIMUM OF 4"TOPSOIL F ! F-axASmxD 5-AIL soEs �� ��,5�•C� o-OVFRSQx6 SEMEN IT LIN FROM BACK Cr axe WATERSHED. PROPO$f0 FRONT SIDEWALK 10.THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR MUST DISCUSS DEWATERING PLANS WITH ALL SUBCONTRACTORS TO ___ rT �,TUe.. ■• PROPOSED CATCH BASINS LYRoy NODE'S RECIIIREMEHTS. IF DEWATERMIG IS REWIRED OUISNG CONSTRUCTION, G�t1� PROPOSED LOT LINE 3. NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL,AT(800)252-1166,48 HOURS PRIOR TO START OF .� ,iiiiiiiiiii.... _ GRACING PAD,SEE DETAIL > >— PROPOSED STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR`' CONSULT WRH F7tDSDN CONTROL INSPECTOR AND EHpIR7cR TO �; =oR •PROPOSED WBUAEO FOOTPRINT — PROPOSED EASEMENT DETERMINE APPROPR411E METHOD. F n• •� N �� 11.4 REAR PAD EEEYATIOH A ALL IMPROVEMENTS TO CONFORM WITH CITY OF APPLE VALLEY CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS 11,REFER TO 510RMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN •WPPP' no [ GARAGE FLOOR LT,EVAUON(AT DOOR) - PROPERTY LINE SPECIFICATION,LATEST EDITION. ( T FOR ALL EROSION AND ASNOUT • �31 �1� $PECWTEO 51IR1$PEN GFE(SPLIT UNITS] ST'AI OE DEVICE LOCATION,pESCRFFIONs,NOTES AND MAILS INCLUDING CONCRETE WASHOUT PROJECT TEAM DATA A{)(11DONAL GARAGE STEPS 4— SETBACK LINE 5. ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL CONSTRUCTION ACCESS POINTS, STATION RK JC110Pi,' O F F DESIGNED: MPR DRIVEWAY SLOPE LOT LINE A. REFER TO CNTECNNIO,REPORT AND PROJECT MANUAL,FOR SOIL CORRECTION REQUIREMENTS 12.BUILDING PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL RETAINING WALLS 4 FEET IN HEIGHT OR GREATER DRAWN: ELL RIGHT-OF-WAY AND TESTI16 REQUIREMENTS. AND THE WALLS SHAM BE DESIGNED BY A STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WITH DE31pfI REWE11E0 AND PROJECT NO: 218-0110 EXISTING CONTOUR APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO INSTALFATION. i ii —IT$— PROPOSED CONTOUR TW 15.0 TOP OF WALL ELEVATION 7" STRIP TOPSOIL PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION.REUSE STOCKPILE ON SITE,STOCKPILE BW 11.0',. BOTTOM OF WALL ELEVATION PERIMETERS MUST BE PROTECTED WITH SILT FENCE. 13.A 3 FOOT SAFETY RAILING IS REQUIRED ATOP ALL WALLS 30•TALL OR GREATER, C ---912--- A MASS GRADE LOT PROPOSED • CONTOUR (BY OTHERS) DIRECTION OF DRAINAGE 8. PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION,THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO MAKE SURE 1A STEPS MAY 6E REQUIRED W SIDEWALKS LEADING TO FRONT OF UNITS.FINAL GRADING PLANS TO - .- �k TO DRAIN TO PRONDE DUALS ON SIDEWALKS REQUIRING STEPS. 0 20 40 BO xOTE sc C AN THAT ALL REQUIRED PERMTf$AND AP PROMS CC*5 NAVE BEEN 0610I7+E0. NO CONSTRUCTpH OR ALL NUMBERS N FEET EXTENT POSSIBLE IM EMERGENCY OVERFLOW ROUTING FABRICATION SHALL MON UNTIL THE CONTRACTOR HAS REVERED AND THOROLICHLV REVIEWED x12,44 +9^ry PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION W a RETAINING WALL ALL PLANS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS APPROVED BY ALL OF THE PERMITTING AUTHORITIES. SCALE IN FEET HOLD DOWN DETAILS SHEET 5 of 14 6 ALLIANT ...v. 733 Marquette Avenue .. 1 1 Suite 700 • i _.I 1 • Minneapolis,MN$5402 .F...-- _.., 812.758 3080 www.alliant-Inc.com '- ,... . • r-'• • ....' .4- NW!, ' I I PRIVATE STORM SEWER scHeouLs . • I. • II , ..,. . r 90.111.10011 p TM sg-s- -.ow... T. .. OM Vit• 11101.0 V I ISIV-srw'42 1 'ET up Al teo ' "3 04"L'-'°.•011.0 90..1.2'•-; 8/01121 44 I , $031i. .• v. •. I I.) . ...,.. - PM MEM•n.0,)kW la*X31= A ...1., ..i...,.. 1 em *V WS It 050_4/0 a0(10 0 ••443._, /as •IIorm vw.ua U 4 61 40/ So• Mt WC maev 1111.• 5.8 leiller .1.0. I VP.1.41 OLIN=1; .s .,s Dm laq 0. 00a ••..• as 0....! • II • I i'l I •• •............ .•. ay.ws rm.40 .3 I 4 .0. 04 am ate am si ISO Ss 0 2225mt,00 • asp0.10 e.100.0 s 00 sts ma Mt WM'ma Wm a •21-1,/," ‘.• ..fam.....14 Maar. ,t, :: Kt $a.: ...,O0 nmli ..0:.: 2: 7 71:7 46.1_ ................. . .!crt:.:,...,. II. •.(77,.,,-,.„. II! ,--- CM:,LPS. PK:4.,1,, lit.. ii..1.... NM 4:4. _ Z. ,14.1•.: ....,..41.-210..: :1 el. _.:1; ' '1,I,10,.... .... '. '..1_......,.!: •'..''' .\ [14411r1. [4111.1 4:;-31 0 11 Six ' 1•0 341. OS ra .7]011,51-0 isurvva an- V '.. _... .. •- . MM. 01504.0 II a M 4.: US AM essa 050 000 as sassy....En as.0 Cass ivo la 00 ma• 4111 .14.1, 11_4 WM 47 IMEAM1 a lZ l. 4.-...2'241104._ ki -Orar....ai $0W01.1.1 IT 000 arl, Issf .1.14 4111" fll IR tam la..... L 152 _ .1-..."' 'i; • ."4.: :2:- 7 -';',4' iaisal‘w Alt rm:s : tr.33 ill Mae • I I/ ,--. --=•-•-2.•.=, 7,.•.,.. ..• .1-- )1. 10.5% *"" " .-----I Me "0: "Cpvt :5: 05"0 :1"j'=" 01! -• /11'/4/ ra la i1.14. _ S. OW K1. 14 -I . i ,:. ....1....1 .f...'-.T.:. ....4•...1 N:V...it--•-•‘, Came Mains ,s 111.1 siC. Me .161 0.13/ .r..9.11411.1 2.14 14.041-11 4011 41(!- OrlarNriiM1 Jelvtir.IN m sm mt et ...e -001 10.550 [41.13 0 U114.141 .11. I t if 4 ai.l. s-Ci• RR_10 maw. ops• brs?1 AL...rms.?... 92_ 2 -.... a) a .. !omi , ,.11 .,01 .. 1 ....,,kiiii t.•.. 1141.7. 1,41... MM.! En.:bra.45., •:. _nitalq. ..0,p m -I 4.1 • , ,L,•7'.• • ! .M:'ffl 1W74 ' li '.; C ''. ..; - 'f. 1 V) g . . lilt! I.ill. .-Jo :. •._ , ! .1 6-/ ....t ..... ..-., . jjIqo .....:tak" No. rl: r: 710:1-74:Z.-st: : .30014 4.4F.1- -.'' va-jvvi0i•vii- '11,1111.1gilL41. L....1- " -_...E7 -L. . 1, I r.,Pl:Ell.0; ..:.:;•;•• !•.'->•‘-'•-i rl ) CM1111411- 41 NI IN .j11,14.,n.„L•11.24 11,.1.1,110 .S de' g __.. .-...i.;;;",--;7;-. 751&11M-1•4•10:4 4 el •Lt., am •-mor sf• 3_17.,i,jpp.n, t m-t4. 545-_Lig V a. 0 • • I ': •ii &III VfOrlINIr."''' ''''' 'i'':. '- •: ', 1E4111 f • . • 1 7,iii:". ea-ii.ita' m. 4.M. -1111.• q1.4 441' Inter we.mact e. Nam al; a) m1m IlasseM1 a iM fa. or III IM et •81,2 SSW 11-1155X001 aaav • •• I 111 ••4 rVtiv40.4:4-\•.1*11;4111 0.. ill Li. .....1 '''' ': •1°52 . . • 1 "' .., . _op ,.... P i.ii,':':.' .: M.'!pm U114 44 444414 411 CC 0 • 111 .1 ihitr,..i.,,A 4.-..-,,t1t, , S.,..011L.1141.....„. -.4.,...,...,54 . iraa...,........5. .... ;' i•'. :Monti Meese sr am ,No• -1.72-4 tsa mrsa_smas,mme co tams'14 ra ....:0001 1-017.0._.0 a 00 07 500 1 1 1. 05.VOT•00 10 0 40 0. .• MPS i -;' i IIt 1 - .1r7 .C-#.41:41V!ri;1111111g#41' i 1.A"4,1 °,".4jqS)iN..e&l:11,.111,. .1 ..1,j,_..P, *It ftkil (.2_,.,,,•:- ..--- ------z.z':.,;,:,:',, . g: . p = 7.,01.41'...„.4,40111, l.kti, •"^.^-,-. •-. .---""..',g. .:. Vs.',!:lZ„- --=':;:..,,, ••.: ' V/I [-,.-,.. 2 . '.4 P •14 • ,1,...,.,..,•lita.144,. ., ,m mi ., mr mu 411 2 , ,„.k W... ...•••=-- --.:-,.•....••-•..• . •4•!'1'.. •-/‘1.- • •1 il : API " j• . _Ilt: .11,111i1,001111 -,,, z----- • , - ,,2_, • ... .. . ._ _ g.D,7,=-17,?•,.„0.. .11 :: ! • 7 . .. 71' 1670-1 STREET WEST. ..,-. ..............- a .1 .,01.1AUTY ASSURANCE/CONTROL . 5 ; 1:1 !. LEGEND.. • ': • • • .. .0•010:0 000 IOUs .M5,0 051i0p0 _ _ i• - • .• sra0001 00110. 1.14•44 VOW 010a0v• N •--- - ...-Norma,wimms Immo Ma11.,..114 ...0 nli•',k A TRW 4414• 111.1.1.01ED cA,c,111E r..1 nem..SUM.arki-L•i 0.4141*4-'1.14.11114141 411•14111. 41..... 41.1. ELL s• F.E.1,111,csi.:va., 4- =7a. .1..ame.,..,...,.•• rysiAs.Tf Or, \-'\". 11‘'.. r ri.Eh.:HfC.4.11 IVA'1 TT 11 0 50 10.) 200. II SCALE 14 'UT • urn 1 1 of 14 e'w/,!PEuc ./.• 0.1i ur a-TM,n�rnEa W/1 P LW Off _ pAMrAZt PL. -1I 7/7( l1P11,..a raft /'Ir,v I 1,14,•rlpLwr OUTLOT L '—,v 'c:rri aM ...r..... fl Ip.l IIW iiK,CraCN • / cn,N _ _ _ _ OUTLOT L { I I T33 Marquette Avenue I I Ft — - l .— ——. —�.z .. . __ n na — -. - .. [ •y I .� ' v I I ' suite�00 if�'�w`� ■■ lMai Minneapolis,MN 554D2 R.QA(7 +� • ,NV III — • arG ..— — SC _• Int4I• J �' L'� rs r.1 '••+v 1 I 1 •' R ' 1 1 e ItR lvn- - I. I._.... ! o I^' 'l� .. I :w :cr I a 1 I 11 MERE r-A id4PRIr K Dvnor■ // V _�-� L1 I I _ _ -_.— 0 nPE HTTRA• MR) 4, - I { ` / /1f!!/ • IJI1. •lIk 44'1 La 1411 rf— cif •4. .. . Eits,1 .-- i .. .. Ai I • • "lb-. ,. P y. l'A ■ purr. _ - Ir Inplyml (:- - _nos • ;•*, . ...,,. Z I a. ��- _ — s. _ • 11 —__ o BAN en XEEP _ OUTLOT E v uEPrRs I ed.lirll,camaer W u W M • rA xacy+a.r • I 1- a a m 157TH STREET WEST• I I VI , :S:r '..w: »r REGENTS POINT REGENTS POINT SECOND ADDITION Iw•I .:4.-•-T. Illy AY MOTES' _ MATE Broom SEWER NOME� _ LEOEND, �, ... _RAEL HE.,h nfo nnc PxI..R",o ox;,Ru_or. OET E EI.,,; IE E o-S CI u..Es_xo,Eo 0I_-x,ncl..,c..vsERC-`n`.„'"vons MPG Il:..,w,s E., OES...OF.IL .[,cr.,r::.a.,VA., Oa.W1Y ASSpFFNCF/COMAOL } ,ItiERi.ti_ -.� .K.r,.EE eww�r r - E PRorosco ewlwr SCAIn - _ �iy%.`rr,rlxn�„ m xIx el,u R.I cf cmEe valve,.P. PE ,.,e L.x .a.�a� �.�,les•Dc�.Ia r,.?�uL�rRRn, nc.ro nI I,IYA__of I PRCINEo M 1M,r - 0 r,eER„H,>s,EE.,,:P,. KCOFFER. .rPx Inx 51.\\ .• = T.;awa Io 7i`a';r on: Ruu,.n. `EPMxs"" 1.via-COPP_er.z•CI,.COx Pnrlml-cR E..I 1',; E:oRArD,I.u...I,w,e- E^D-_x-.,v.r.+E .. VP ADSEIDI GIE'Vu Ax ".N. \,s\ -•.E..o...:um.:r RDE ROB pITNtP-w ✓•To . y.aU E uatEs ul EP 'E on PO I. .•COOP,nrn, , CO'or uPL[PAL,11001111 J PPwosEo x,R&VI ` PF.:T "si roR CRI2 oR �• R .I- na.EG ILIAD LIET4L- - > +[W�'n WNW.*CA 1 1n�w[1E v. I E_ wir.Ellx_T F•11e6 W[UVNI[ SEWER - n ROxrCOMER 510.7E UnE CPG <e HOOPS 1x A>/A.CE Of AN,El H mat I.'lrLO rIrLI[I - nr,.P.E vA..Er Ew:u_ay.a Lr .ce ISP zexnE.0 Aw.nau ARE xED CPBOAL PRO 1.a.10 WI... N �narL wvu`,,W.D CIIIROL�u c Lvaix¢ Cu.14 ALB nnW PE Arm,SIBB.No Ai. cOnnllu on x`N�iI .. LUAE urEsr RE,ON,FOR<s� 1 WM 1Kaa•,w%1 I'SM=lua OMR ` .c,A E of e'I�c`�nEnr.Aka -n,.R,m ELEV.,.u,nrn+n oxhcw.v Iuru.Pvcro.� n csrxcs SPILL - wn-.eww NM. BM evo Pr, c cart o.n.c E Dix , Px, P uR ImL rER.� ��.��,vENS 011 v�m NIL cro, r'rI"'°L'K'"•war .nxn a w m s oP xooEl , �.iRs>•nc wxrea io - _ - - - .. - (mrs[+Innw Li NM - ,. LAW.L:MELD u,t0,AER'ILA'Epr RE U:I)_ICEErnv v-so FCC nrr cf wsl,.EOPLEO s Eurlcnrc.. I - _Fist o PLR APPLE vu,E,_f.noH,u c'.IIFEN OC..vmnli u_ POW. DLO,PATE. o-a uw 510 IC el .T,R,-EMIR S.tiI PI P„N.TE --VALLEY. r4 44 511 12 IgIM ."'r 12 of 14 1 go A4 " 1 i i § a11 ti y�,�„ ... i i ■ ■»_, U■l�M:= = y=• ■i■ •M• ■_-Jr — i, S.., '■■■, ■I■f■ iR. .=•01.1■ =• ■I MI■�■a *aukeGLour JOCaE NtlI�.� �.�.,=T ` — — .- .' _If ■.`:. .'.:Iw:.• -= u.In._._. * "w.1 e ��yy 1 `e RC *`w:r:.'M:MA '..'..�.I'..I I.I..rl.i..1.,-I.'.i....`.i*l 1LC-- Q = waw w`s•:•r ..':.'.r1y1rf.�rl..I..,]}{!' -,Irrr..1.�.'w —Ile �`� 1 F k... •t US— _!'..�'nn:.�'I�=�eli•-:e:v.,'.11'.•i_= - ,��a'r.Ie!r-! =r-�.e.^'.Vie-n�: -- UNIT 1 -i� UNIT 2 1 UNIT 3 I UNIT 4 HIGHNUOD HIGHWOOO HALRON HALSlON REAR e vnn NFL NIN.,..,..menu..wr vow KR' 4 A ; 1, ;, 1 __ I I 6A BOA91 Pill YU - -_ . ,— .. �. y.yyee� Xg VI N.y, Tom" iffilfYl'— e M— O Mt f111�1 �� . • 2 - f 4t.=` M Wit .... � � _ — i III I 1IIII I IIIIll :III III:=i€ 111 I: i=; 11111i 111111 `I , � nluinlTil'ul_ � � - ni=ml; G - �,...�, — l nI �vWH.- T-_ I-I I —__-- T- I... S a ��"��_['I 1f i11-HI ':; 1=_ilI in `iifilly =iIIIlu 1 x -.a 1 ,i ■_■_ ■ ■— - 1: __ - _. 4t..�,.4 . •II �:: -ii 111 ,1 '. • I i �`�11A ■I [ Ifl I x - UNIT 4 I UNIT 3 I UNIT 2 I UNIT 1 RBI WAD ,HALSEON-ELEV 01A HALST f-ELEV 02A HIR •(LIMA MIv1A000 [LEY 41A WhalrOD I FRONT ELEVATION•BUILOW ydOPT.MASS re Y -" w— T- ati r— — s 2. y n 3' y 1 1 1 1 $ - 1 I i l I — - LiiiELEr PS.:1 - i - 1�P41teGroup- Li III I 1I II•1 LI:,:_ .II' I[ .�,a---•.-'::IIII , , ll's( IVJ! l,19111 [Iil47L llLll• �ii!!I I1'111...:_ lillgI !H!llllllll.l�llli:_ _neanu�.__x• _ _ — .P6 � .. .._ - ... - -- :.•.mxlw " i l"1[—li lf li"J-1 x r.. L: 1..f ..w4"w w�""4 44 � L. � •I.` {t{{'lp��� ■�w�w�n.ait'��f G. IF 1,f*�R•' ..•i•■ _ .. 1.M..'•fi n. —Isl R�•wilm,miol* f.4-lle"20-- aRa.:-:wn.a .. t .. l _ .-— — .ry -r+_ 1 - .— UNIT 1 J UNIT 2 I UNIT 3 I UNIT 4 1 ^UNIT 5 HIIGIl*O) HICHW000 HkSIIXN - HICHW000 HA[STON REAR ELEVATION-BUILDING 1 - 1 1 1 r10w•AP10 IIIII Iilii ii 'mum n1111 PE111n1Miii111E'�ff iiiiii• imiel rinurlf flnlli A- RAsra Wm_ .� II■III I■iil (Elm, ■m.`-i m-•• -1■■ mi■: I l■miIlilim■�� ..,--MI NZ_.• _-"__ _ lit - - �, _"III . _- __ _ — _- i a- 1.1f?,6.4*-.'- ,N111.11 Ini ..17 I. KIMPtilfini.jr-i.i:M.-=iii.7-• 11 1 =II[ili' f iii:y 111- 111 i11 -_ill_III' 11 g�` - # ilatr-Gi "Ju wt I 1 I ' E 1 i i ml, III l 111M- . il■'r 11 �:111 E__ x'MS_. .r_l•r;. 1] 1 i i :I l r�'f:=:t_:-.... `t 1 ry �t rr�-".r. s,t. ..I.I I.I . -:r.'. -.,.I�OD i- .—. F a7£3 �TC `d:•ei 1 [ '.ri'i:`.r,•F_.7;c! •_T'=;.+ :i��:.._, _ 1] rig` ._./H UNIT ALSTON E5A I NG UNIT OD E4A . . p UNIT 32A 1 �,UNIT E2o,A i NI UNIT 1oq ' s T= joii z FRONT ELEVATION-BUILDING 1 WI OPT.MASONRY _g. 1 Ii.1 l A 'Cm € • Q b m s En .i, Am8 1 1 1 1 1 • o EA 0 . f 1 I I5! A�Hw>< - fi g , D. :. -1■■n..M.I■1 ! i..■MI.z ■■I. . ■I1`■E-1=0'�I■- _ =- a ■■I■--.MINI1 - ®■I■I■ - ----■■■_- - ■■I■__-_--- lilkItaGroup- Tom,.E� _ I ::: ;;I.I I;I::; i; .00IIOO+R--- - .".�� ". - - ....._.._.._. � 5....-. _ �...".II. 1.I.�rl..I.1.M, . • '.. . .a - -- _ q1=1 --- -_i .*wrri Ki'wnits: f ! `ow�a - ai. — NI*FlI M 1_I 1nIM1! M'.I.i.aI.a a _ ..i..'a...!a ---i•1 I•. - a1["° =i•w'•p'.I.I �.�r r�:i.Ef 1.1 I ■.rlr�.I.i rj.' =- .e w'xom.r'_ .�._::... l[v ..— �s��l �i f ... w-- w .�. .� s rr..t I.f.: wia _- I- UNIT 1 1 UNIT 2 a 1 UNIT 3 I UNIT 4 1 UNIT 5 MUNIT 6 ~ HIGNN,O0 116111.1000 MALSION HAISTQV HIGH14000 HALSMON r WAA ,7:;A� �IIDl 71 ,...,..s rr..wov17.w w. R g ;4 pwt<:I.; 1 1 1 1 2m Illl l Illl l IgI III Ia Hai i'�llllll'�IilllFliiii III—6'WIC-C . IliK 11111@I Mill Illli '+ i O r,wA®K. I■I MI MAMIE •■■ �-1r11=■■M��_■■-�I■■- _■W• 1.1M. .■■'II■■1. o a.m..—�. y�E1��� G: E: A >ad�. Ai��[ _Lill —== E�,�« .�. _=— is Imi111=IiijIII= �_ ...., !gm IIIlrllll. =1mI= Irlllr _lu:=b11' 111. :mum'lu 111;=ip� r� ,�� �;— e!!i' - — _ _=_ . i _ - _ 41' �E ram,.. T... _._ $ "0'•w0° -iIIIIII 1 III111 r° ` 1111L111� IIl" =.: llllll W 11fE 6 0 "°`—.I�, W — III 111=l § i _ ■ � ::.1.ip■I■ � ' ■I ■1='i--1:p 11-•.LIo1, . Il■■ 1 i■ii■ti k'LoII I r ,„, — 8F•�. -s;-:_..•:-• : - 1_:_I, 1`i ?i"ti' f:i.uric'F:C f;yir{I iY,s.' I:-Xi f 'EY}i i]Ef�i::i!f... „ In ... UNIT 6 1 UNIT 5 UNIT 4 I UNIT 3 UNIT 2 UNIT 1 • REMIND f. HALSTI1-ELEV 01A HIGH331200-REV 02A MALS0ON-ELEV 000 WLSSp-CHI 026 HIGHW000-EMI 03A 0GHM000-ELEV 01A 1 1a691+. # FRONTEtEYATIQN-BUIL01N 1wl -"- " - - - y w1 1 Cp ELII . I. p o3 m .5.-. I '5 A, A -- a 2 ai I .- lifyiteGrour Ijr. m IIBOWp,PR SRC rBo�b PM SRC C YY'ili 6.W�oNB1[WKIO W AwnoY➢[Olu aramlr___ tixnuNEIll. it fBBri lB rear BO..PIB�B °— aBBnwBOBc ' ,,,I 'rBUBxmnc wi ° -- ..: _ _ _— T.� r _ _ auxe1n — ■'� a 0161,u Mt_- — ° _ uv ftB mac— _ —i - - ri -- — '.sea nn_—.—. s _—_ ° ..— ,.:,—. tgYe1e,7.o.d11,/.50i/ / ��� �_":,I I'lll;l'lili'.'.—__ __ •• __ _a:..- • ._ _� �. =_- — " _ -- —II:Ill1.1111fl:_ —__ x tee. }....._ +vewlc+ne • - Ver e .4 ""i, _ REAR LOAD • 1 UNIT 4MOM HALS70N ELE H UNIT 1 �y� HICHN900-ELEV 01 ,ppg"9.} 911.. LEFT ELEVATION-BUILDING 1 � � a2 1571' Street West is in place to serve Phase 1. It is our assumption that extension of Johnny Cake Ridge Road will occur in conjunction with development of Phase 2. Internal streets will be designed to standard private street requirements and will be privately owned and maintained by the homeowner's association. Sewer and water have both been extended to the property. Sewer and water extended through the neighborhood will be publicly owned and maintained within drainage and utility easements. The current land owner is working with City staff on the design and construction of a regional storm water facility directly to the east of the neighborhood. Storm sewer constructed within the neighborhood will be privately owned and maintained by the homeowner's association. The current property is being mined under a Conditional Use Permit. One requirement of this permit relates to perimeter berming requirements. As part of our plan set, we are showing a relocation of existing berming from immediately north of 157 Street West to immediately north of the new neighborhood. This will result in both compliance with the existing CUP as well as providing adequate screening/buffering between the land uses. Our Homes Pulte Homes is known for the extraordinary steps that we take to ensure that we are designing and building homes that meet the needs and desires of home buyers. We continually reach out to the public and Pulte homeowners to get feedback to improve our home designs. We call this Life Tested®. The Shores will have versatile 3-story rowhomes, which will provide association-maintained lawn, snow removal, and building exterior maintenance. This type of home appeals to many singles, first-time home buying couples, young families, and even some empty nesters. We built almost identical homes in the Cobblestone neighborhood in 2016-2017 in "Trey Point," and the product was well received and sold out in less than 15 months. We anticipate the townhome prices to range from the high $200k's to the mid $300k's. Architecture Background For a variety of reasons, very few townhomes were built after the real estate crash began in 2007. Pulte and other builders have recently begun to carefully venture back into the townhome market. Given the long time span since rowhomes in have been built, the market environment has changed significantly, including the tastes and needs of the buying public. In response, Pulse has completed in-depth consumer surveys and designed what could be considered "version 2.0"for rowhomes. "Version 1.0" Rowhome Architecture One of the original primary drivers of sales for rowhomes is that it expands the range of consumers who can afford home ownership. In "version 1.0", this was typically accomplished by having identical floor plans and many exterior units being identical in appearance. A common theme was that some or most of the units within a building would have the same exterior 5 elevation. Another common theme was to have the same color scheme or two alternating color schemes for all individual units. "Version 2.0" Rowhome Architecture With Pulte's version 2.0, our goal is to maintain some level of price attainability, but to improve on the historical rowhome architectural themes. Our overall approach is to "individualize and stylize" each unit. The result is individual units which differ in architecture from all other units within the same building and which vary in color scheme from most homes within the neighborhood. This is a significant advancement in the approach to rowhome architecture. Our new rowhome incorporates the following individualizing features: a) Significant number of and varying orientation of windows providing interest to the exterior and transparency and daylighting on the interior b) Windows and building corners are wrapped with trim c) Different types of gables d) Pediments and brackets within the gables to add interest e) Window shutters f) Porches g) Horizontal banding boards between floors to add variety and differentiation h) Articulation of each unit; each unit is offset in depth from the adjacent units by two feet; this creates shadows which visually"break up" the front of the building i) Varied color scheme for each unit and for most units within our community (for example, we may have 25 different color schemes throughout the neighborhood) The result is that each unit will appear unique and distinct. See attached photos and elevations of Elevation A. Due to the size of this neighborhood, we wish to provide additional architectural variety. Therefore, we are introducing an upgraded Elevation B that includes additional architectural treatments such as: a) Cultured stone b) Bump outs c) Dormers d) Pediments, and e) Different siding patterns/materials. See attached photos and elevations of Elevation B. We will be interspersing Elevations A and B throughout the neighborhood. Over 1/3 of the buildings will have Elevation B. We will focus on displaying Elevation B in the high visibility locations along 157'h Street West, Johnny Cake Ridge Road, and along the public open space to the east. The combination of varying the building orientation, elevation, and color schemes will result in an attractive and thoughtfully planned neighborhood. • Architectural Compliance City ordinance describes the following architectural requirements for multiple family residential districts: 1. "The proposed materials represent the same or similar materials used on at least 66.7% and of the existing buildings within 350 feet of the site. 2. The proposed materials are demonstrated to be of comparable grade and quality as those otherwise required. 3. The materials have the appearance of wood siding having a maximum plank width of 12 inches. Under no circumstance shall sheet or corrugated aluminum, iron, steel, asbestos, sheet plywood or similar materials be used which have no three-dimensional relief, nor shall plain or painted plain concrete block be used. Any decorative concrete block shall be colored only by means of a pigment impregnated throughout the entire block." We comply with all the above requirements. There are not many homes built within 350 feet. However, those built are single family homes that primarily utilize vinyl siding. Some homes have cultured stone accents. Our homes will also utilize vinyl siding. All buildings with Elevation B will have cultured stone accents. The materials of our homes will be comparable in grade and quality as the single-family homes. The primary difference in architecture between the adjacent single-family homes and our homes is that our garages will be hidden from public view locations. New Approach to Rowhome Floor Plans We realize that the City is primarily interested in exterior architecture. However, it is worth noting that our approach to "individualized and stylized" rowhome units extends to the interior as well. Buyers can choose from a range of options that are not typically seen in version 1.0 floor plans: a) 3 bedrooms with options for a 4th b) 2 car garages with an option for a 3rd tandem stall c) Two owner suites in lieu of one owner suite and two smaller bedrooms d) 1st floor flex room and additional bathroom We believe that floor plan versatility and individualization at the scale offered with this design is unmatched in the Twin Cities market. Building Height It should be noted that our buildings (46-feet to roof peak) are 1-foot taller than allowed by your ordinance (45-feet). Therefore, we will be redesigning and redrawing our homes to have a flatter roof pitch that will meet the City ordinance. We have begun the redesign process and are including an early version of it. See attached elevations. Phasing & Schedule The following preliminary schedule for development is envisioned based on current information: Winter 2018/2019 Preliminary plat approval Summer/Fall 2019 Development of Phase 1 7 I rr r 1 I OUTLOT N OUTLOT L I 1 r OUTLOT M 1 if 1. 1 ‘-' , ,r l N� 1 . a, 1 �- a¢ 1 UO ' U_ ____ _ ____ .C0 M 9r 1 M BLOCK o m 9N o co / 2 3 4 5 6 1 0° o v 1 r I FUTURE ND .. J 1 OUTLOT H OUTLOT K 1 OUTLOTJI / r i e-I / C 1_ - v CO 1 / `---G `-- Th I 7 ,y, 1 =Mk U ', , U 92 li M O ON ��• = m ' . /// 5 BLOCK 11 2 1 II O i I . p : I , 1 J 1 1 OUTLOTJ 1111 N\ ' / I� II j / A A BLOCK 13 BLOti A " / ,� 2 3 4 5 2 �' �4Y, r�� /�.. Mo PARK!I !IJ � (�I m 11 0.28 AC (12,191 SF) ROAD B OUTLOT A — i )14 ,.,, OUTLOT K 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 7 OUTLOT L BLOCK 21 BLOCK 20 OUTLOT E ' , 157TH STREET WEST REGENTS POINT SECOND ADDITION N 0 20 40 80 SCALE IN Design File: Designed By: 218-0110 MPR Alliant Engineering,Inc. THE SHORES 733 Marquette Avenue Dwg Name: Checked By: Suite 700 PARK DEDICATION MPR PARK DEDICATION EXHIBIT Minneapolis,MN 55402 Date: Drawn By: APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA 612.758.3080 12/18/18 ELL www.alliant-inc.com 7/23/2020 THE SHORES APPLE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL J U LY 23, 2020 MEETING THE SHORES REQUEST • An amendment to the 2030 Comprehensive Plan Land Map re-designating approximately 2.5 acres from "LD" (Low Density Residential/2-6 units per acre) and 7.3 acres from "HD" (High Density Residential/12+ units per acre)to "MD" (Medium Density Residential/6-12 units per acre) • Rezoning of 9.9 acres of property from "SG" (Sand and Gravel)to "M-6C" (Medium Density Residential/6-12 units per acre) • Subdivision of 9.9 acres into 101 residential townhome lots and thirteen (13) outlots • Conditional use permit to allow for townhome construction with exposed finish materials other than those provided under section 155.346 of the city code • Site plan/building authorization to allow for construction of 101 townhome dwelling units on 9.9 acres 1 7/23/2020 LOCATION MAP ly 4\ Wig-, r JA SITE ',x i �, wir v 1� QTOWNHOME ■1"4m�l .STE s _ I ejr o.p _ �_ ,yrtCpboip�p Q QUARRY REGENT2S s� "�- — 1 CSC ...CI P/—O�IN�T �": QUARRY K POINT T '1�.r g..,,, ii. DIjj�I111r u � \_ Valley eure 0. LAKEVILLE• �-'•, 1 _ ' l 1 I COMP PLAN MAP Iim._ -- E MI nnn e *ii Mil i ;ñi LD C a „1i,e1 z A0, i ill% =`,!s,,,a.' l :moon_ 1 iI DOCIatia viiii/1 �r= MIMI HilliPAM MilMi E�.�. -4.1= A�'Valley "LD"(Low Density Residential)and"HD"(High Density Residential) 2 7/23/2020 PROPOSED COMP PLAN MAP pili:01r2 11 MBC ■sr��• em= Cali i Ei O ■ LD Q C AVID tit mops 11111l"## LD / 41 4'11`��It 111 ow.. _ ...j 111 ��11111111■i a III I Bill Mill*AG I Apple„ Valley L II—II_ II "MD"(Medium Density Residential) 1 Iu ZONING MAP 1 1 J 7 rj �,i►,N►,►,,.,,, el a11_ I ® 4 v-i. ultoo r11111AA1 prr=so ,„ift,,.YYYYIa '�.i ��Y,..• v1�22 -It =r� II441raim' "SG"(Sand and Gravel) 3 7/23/2020 PROPOSED REZONING 1 ri. in alb m Elk E. 47___ ILI -II pont ®� e!���ms pi4 OE aIi. l e„ ®B EN rlAllllr� rum 1�' -II .Docgratir ft_ : I i im— MA Il`fA "M-6C"(Multi-Family Residential/6-12 units per acre) EXISTING CONDITIONS , } IT Existing • Shop/Storage -_ $. •Lj Yard 9g, I 91 II I Proposed k s Townhome } I . _ i xI : Development -. .. 4 7/23/2020 PRELIMINARY PLAT Incorporate into Adjacent Outlots ._. _ 1 ...., ., a El KOMI Kilill •,-- . M-E An 11-S1 IIIL E '..a.'' PLO 1 ' • #* IIIII1 .1:1 rz 0 - ....i. ,..,„ 3-ii •,.- . ....., „pi • 10 . 4 4 ititit -.7,:-.-.., .4, • --- Ilx3 Mal , 4.-i„kw .• s'fr4.4o- AV Pyr - - ...,,.," ttrrogg krprir —4 ...A 11 "i _ 1 I I —.z --- —........ -.:117-":1 7 ----H-----71 777-'...''=.==. --7•Fr.-:- "-e- . .11:-. :I::.-: ..: 1..•:-- .7.1:-_:.- ::. =: I: = :::-E:i: -7-z:--- i .,.. 1 r_ :•: !...1-- r.s.-- •::.: '.1 1.7 r. 7.: ii Li .''''.r-:7--'-- = ,4...7- • ,: : : = -.7 •1,:- = ,:.-- = .:-. :.::.-_-.•E•:i "'"'-'"''''..-,___-_-.____ --—.__- .,- --,..----.7.-j :;LF. .: .. L_•:. ii..-:i- F..q -=__-•_..r......_--=-. 3 GHOST PLAT .._ .. , - , .-,-,1111"P"EC', , - ,-...-• • _-,r6,1 / •". ----7 ,iiie . . ._ , 4 r . ' ,. I i, . - - .ork. • .'"'ir- ". :.'': -^-.;": 9a. •:' , ii , = -7-=.- - --41 I l-.4. .•, ....__ . ---0==— 411, . , • - a , —_ ..._ Mk litk 11111 . I" t 1 I Dote THE SHORES..WITH GHOST PLAT EXPANSION . — MIA vALLV 11014,41101.• ..---...... ....2-L.i.•.47::::::- 5 7/23/2020 SITE PLAN Right In/Right Out Temporary Only Intersection Turnaround ,riii iiiii. r ■MI' %—• Aid rim .�-+-• 4 . . Mil • 1 ,i, •!;, . . , ,,,_. Proposed Add - _ ! +i Temporary Sidewalk Full Turnaround "°'""- _� 1_ Intersect on R- .,. _ •wez •era, -__ _ �'.- — j A - sEa� ♦r 1 - PHASING PLAN • r r -i • 3� f I r �-'-e r: I F. z F F I • 1I. II 6 7/23/2020 GRADING PLAN Screening Berm Per C.U.P. A , ii . 6 ----iiiim------1 i-1 itiolinti-411 illti a,. _PA 1 IT 'i � r■ ... . _ r ndin yi -11 : l onstructed 4 t * -4,, = -6 . Y Applicant1 r •• t i7i7 .,{ // 1 I 44" ,... '44,,,,,,4„, , _, , PONDING AREA Existing r. _.__ Shop/51orage - — 1 i s �.:—_- I li = Yard till r 113 Proposed 1, 1 Townhome J , .. L Development 1 - ------_------- s, 1 r_ 1_ zi - y=-------�- --. _. ._ :ter P I 7 7/23/2020 UTILITY PLAN e : Illivinsi— ..-i—..71 . 1 . I /1 L .� Li E w.a �.'. mom, '' - LANDSCAPE PLAN Add Landscaping .: ,.. ..; ., ! % 't // 444,• 1 �� • , f131 . i E 1 .CL_ - 1$ 8 7/23/2020 FOUNDATION PLANTING IM :4. �r 4. Tyarcal a-Uart Plants T`alc-unit Plan lI 11 i o z ■ _ : TvoKol6 n Pon LANDSCAPE PLAN w ilk , :011-. . ellh _. . • • .mot .. _=.tea 9 7/23/2020 BUILDING ELEVATIONS . .. ,. II si ii itt.... 1 : • I II • ir-' 1' !I . .i! • MR I . W.I (WFS W.1.I ... .- l'.1 . ' :• :• .,I 1 .......... 1:CT)1171LXI4 i: -31.f EilnLf-7 : t ].... . . 1.7. . t.... •.-7.. .1-• , . '-J.1.-t ...!.r::_l_.!.....9...:.g...1.A..:••• . . .. . ..__ .. _.... iM L. ...:....e. IM •I I- I BUILDING ELEVATIONS . . . L. 111 . . ,3.4,---: ,,i ,.,....,-„,„.,,,,,w„.,.: ....._. ,.,,..... .,....,„... ,...„,..„„tig,„:.,,D,:piii,E., • ., . L,1.1 'T.' t.r. 210,131r1.1..1. "'- 'a 11 Ili • — L. • 5 .,:- ,-,..,F,A.,70:41....4,i4u4;.,..,.w.V.'=-Prr,NE:,,:- •`'' - 1-11. :' ,...3,!.'..-2::-7:::-7.,..;,',.31,•!t•-'rf'-..11111;:";-', 7--- . ME !HIV all!! 1 I., . .• • .. .. .. ':. — 7t".. .1.1.0.14•IAMIVP,VOW I 10 7/23/2020 BUILDING ELEVATIONS .111 , • L H it•.-7,- intl—Hafil::01gIUMMEAE4. ....— :-..---_- pi.erqpi egrzlcr.viiiviiialpee lu:pi iinA: t, • ITrr 2 . un, . L..:. . uhas utrte MEP... i----.'. Ili 7.7,411.17.--F'.....:7%'-',".-,-:,,,,.,:::.‘''., '-.T...--i''.•Iii1P1... = 1 P.11;,q 13:I=1:3:1.. 11:1:1_ I 1 .- .1, L.1,5. . 3,4,L,_ ...Ng 1 313113. t3tcr k. MEI 3 3 3 ififyinormi....3 BUILDING ELEVATIONS I. Li 0 ri ..... III Ig-n --'-' ,1111111.. 1111111 ..0 nu 1711 .....--— P'..,TiolliCililliiiii,... _ I ;: t.: --. __ ft. --. • - • irt: : I • 4cri WI .14co.mail PAW.... ........... .ID .....-- 11 7/23/2020 BUILDING ELEVATION Pulte El EEE r• ■■■ Irrnli ," Tn; Elevation A ApPValley BUILDING ELEVATION Pulte „tool]171 Upgraded Elevation B Apple Valley 12 7/23/2020 PROPOSED PARK DEDICATION iiin 1-1g.-1 ',..,:s&l: i -- .., ..._..L.,_. ill r—iwst F-1421 ; r—...... :,..1 , . ... iom i p II I-,_ .....=- 1........00‘.° •--------- - ........... ........... — i te4F EaMIN ,ut van LAND CONVEYANCE MAP r' 1 1 I•- 1 1 .......F 1 1- 1 ,•1 1 I• I I: I ,ii li il ___ ...., i , , • 1 4"V.-- ..,...Pwur .., lir-- - iI i ---— , --- --- A :-4-.:=2:• PARCEL --.7_ ".'—!--"." ---7.-.- r'XHIRITIT-..- -.-""--,," --7 II' A N..e=7,7 :_7.1.. ,/ PPleVelley ........_ 13 7/23/2020 THE SHORES RECOMMENDATION 1. Pass the ordinance rezoning of 9.9 acres of property from "SG" (Sand and Gravel) to "M-6C" (Medium Density Residential/6-12 units per acre) 2. Adopt a resolution approving The Shores subdivision preliminary plat; subject to the standard requirements and conditions set forth in the City code and to the conditions identified in the resolution 3. Adopt a resolution approving a conditional use permit to allow for townhome construction with exposed finish materials other than those provided under section 155.346 of the city code 4. Adopt a resolution authorizing the conveyance of 9.9 acres of land located at the northeast corner of 157th Street West and Johnny Cake Ridge Road 5. Approve the agreement with Pulte Homes of Minnesota, LLC, for the private installation of public infrastructure for Project 2018-170, The Shores GHOST PLAT/DRAINAGE ...„) - r i111111 put THE SNORES.wITN 3N051"PLAT EXPANSION Q A 14 • ITEM: 7. ..... :�. Apple COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 23, 2020 Valley SECTION: Calendar of Upcoming Events Description: Approve Calendar of Upcoming Events Staff Contact: Department/ Division: Stephanie Marschall, Deputy City Clerk City Clerk's Office ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the calendar of upcoming events as listed in the summary below, and noting each event listed is hereby deemed a Special Meeting of the City Council. SUMMARY: Day/Date Time Location Event Tue./July 21 2:00 p.m. Municipal Center Cemetery Advisory Committee Meeting Thur./July 23 5:30 p.m. Municipal Center Special EDA Meeting Thur./July 23 7:00 p.m. Municipal Center Regular City Council Meeting Tue./Aug. 4 7:30-9:00 a.m. On-Site Title Chamber Coffee Connection Wed./Aug. 5 7:00 p.m. Municipal Center Planning Commission Meeting Tue./Aug. 11 State Primary Election Thur./Aug. 5:30 p.m. Municipal Center Informal City Council 13 Meeting Thur./Aug. 7:00 p.m. Municipal Center Regular City Council 13 Meeting Wed./Aug. 7:00 p.m. Municipal Center Planning Commission 19 Meeting Wed./Aug. 9:00 a.m. Municipal Center Firefighters Relief 26 Association Meeting Thur./Aug. 5:30 p.m. Municipal Center Special Informal City 27 Council Meeting Thur./Aug. 7:00 p.m. Municipal Center Regular City Council 27 Meeting BACKGROUND: Each event is hereby deemed a Special Meeting of the City Council, the purpose being informational or social gathering. Only events marked with an asterisk (*) will any action of the Council take place. BUDGET IMPACT: N/A