Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-05-20 minutes CITY OF APPLE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 5, 2020 1. CALL TO ORDER The City of Apple Valley Planning Commission meeting was called to order by Chair Melander at 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Chair Tom Melander, Tim Burke*,Jodi Kurtz,Paul Scanlan*,Ken Alwin*, and Keith Diekmann*. Member Absent: David Schindler City staff members attending virtual meeting: City Attorney Sharon Hills, Community Develop- ment Director Bruce Nordquist, City Planner Tom Lovelace, City Engineer Brandon Anderson, and Planner/Economic Development Specialist Alex Sharpe. *Present via remote technology 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Chair Melander asked if there were any changes to the agenda. CD Director Nordquist said no changes. MOTION: Commissioner Burke moved, seconded by Commissioner Kurtz, approving the agenda. Rollcall vote: Ayes - 6—Nays - 0. 3. CONSENT ITEMS MOTION: Commissioner Burke moved, seconded by Commissioner Kurtz, approving the minutes of the meeting of July 15, 2020. Rollcall vote: Ayes - 6 —Nays - 0. 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS -- NONE— 5. LAND USE/ACTION ITEMS A. Applewood Pointe—PC19-10-ZSB City Planner Tom Lovelace is recommending approval of: 1. Rezoning from"M-6A" (Multi-Family Residential/6-12 Units per Acre)to"PD" (Planned Development). 2. Subdivision by plat to create one lot and one outlot. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County,Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes August 5,2020 Page 2 of 13 3. Site Plan/Building Permit Authorization to allow for a 3-4 story/98 unit seniors co-op building on 7.46 acres. City Planner presented a PowerPoint Comprehensive Plan: The 2040 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map guides the property "MD" (Medium Density Residential/6- 12 units per acre). Medium Density Residential land uses in- clude townhomes, other attached single-family dwellings, and low-rise apartments and condo- miniums at densities that range from 6-12 units per acre. This designation fits with the M-4, M-5, M-6, and PD zoning districts. The applicant is proposing to construct 98 multi-family dwelling units and seven (7)villa homes on ten (10) acres. This will result in an overall density of 11 units per acre, consistent with the "MD" designation. The proposed development is compatible with the current land use designation. Livable Communities Impact: The proposed multi-family development will provide 98 senior co-op dwelling units and seven townhomes. This development proposal will address the City's Livable Communities Act(LCA)principles of adding a housing product that helps provide a balanced supply and variety of housing types for people of all income levels and in all lifecycle stages. Zoning: The property is currently "M-6A" (Multiple Family Residential/6-12 units per acre). This property has had this designation since 1990. Prior to 1990, the property was zoned "A" (Agricultural) as was much of the non-public property in the area. Zoning districts are intended for those areas which are designated for "medium density" in the comprehensive guide plan, where a moderately high density of townhouse or apartment dwelling units is expected. Property within these districts are characterized by relatively level topography, the minimal presence of significant mature vegetation and proximity to either neighborhood or community collector roads or to arterial roads. Townhouse dwellings and apartment buildings are permitted uses within this zoning district. A building in this zoning district can be no taller than 45 feet and can have a maximum of three sto- ries. The proposed building will have a maximum height of 56 feet. The proposed 98-unit senior co-op development will be located on a 7.5-acre lot. This will create a density of 13 units per acre. The applicant is requesting a rezoning from "M-6A" to "PD" (Planned Development). A Planned Development is an urban development often having two or more principal uses and having spe- cialized performance standards relating to an overall approved development plan to provide for an optimal land use relationship. The purposes of a planned development are: • To encourage a more creative and efficient approach to the use of land; • To allow a variety in the types of environment available to the people of the city; CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County,Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes August 5,2020 Page 3 of 13 • To encourage more efficient allocation and maintenance of privately controlled open space in residential developments through the distribution of overall density of popula- tion and intensity of the land use where an arrangement is desired and feasible; • To provide the means for greater creativity and flexibility in environmental design than is provided under the strict application of the zoning and subdivision chapters while at the same time preserving the health, safety, order, convenience ,prosperity and general welfare of the city and its inhabitants; • To encourage an overall design within the natural boundaries for an area; and • To provide an overall guide for developments that are staged because of the size of an area. The criteria necessary for approval of the preliminary development plan as well as the rezoning shall be as follows: The proposed development is in conformance with the comprehensive guide plan of the city and encompasses an area of not less than five acres. The proposed development plan is designed in a manner so as to form a desirable and unified en- vironment within its own boundaries. The planned development will not create an excessive burden on parks, schools, streets and other public facilities and utilities which serve or are proposed to serve the planned develop- ment. The proposed maximum number of stories (four) and 56-foot tall building height would be ad- dressed through a planned development. Preliminary Plat: The subject property is currently unplatted. The applicant is proposing to subdivide the 10.9-acre site into one (1) lot and one (1) outlot. The proposed 7.5-acre lot will be the location of the 98-unit senior cooperative building. The 1.1-acre outlot will be reserved for future residential development. The remaining land area will be public right-of-way. The plat shows 75-foot highway easement for the half right-of-way of Pilot Knob Road and 50 feet of half right-of-way for McAndrews Road. An additional 25 feet of right-of-way width will need to be dedicated for McAndrews Road. Drainage and utility easements are shown along the perimeter of the property and a drainage and utility/access easement is shown over and across the development's private street. A minimum 10-foot wide easement shall be established along the property lines abutting the public roadways and five foot(5')wide drainage and utility easement along all common lot lines. Site Plan: The applicant is proposing a 98-unit senior cooperative building on a 7.9-acre lot. Ac- cess to the site would be via a 26- foot wide private street that will intersect with McAdrews CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County,Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes August 5,2020 Page 4 of 13 Road (CSAH 38) on the south and Pilot Knob Road (CSAH 31) on the west side. Access to the building and surface parking will be via two driveways directly from the private street. A third driveway off the private street will provide access to the building's underground parking. The plan identifies 63 surface parking spaces and 115 underground,which equate to a ratio of 1.8 vehicle parking spaces per unit. City code does not specifically address parking for senior only apartments. Review of parking for recent senior apartment projects show that parking ratios vary depending on the type of project. For comparison, the Summerhill senior cooperative on Granite Avenue and 140th Street West has a parking ratio of 1.8 spaces per unit and the Zvago senior cooperative, located at the corner of Founders Lane and Galaxie Avenue, has 1.7 spaces per unit. It appears that the parking for this proposed project is con- sistent with similar projects that have been built in the city. The proposed building will be set back 76 feet from McAndrews Road, 56 feet from Pilot Knob Road, 59 — 112 feet from the rear property line, and 25 —40 feet from the private street. Building setbacks in typical multi-family zoning districts vary from 50 — 100 feet when adjacent to an arterial road, 20 feet from a private drive and 25 —40 feet from any rear or side yard. Parking lot setbacks in multi-family residential zoning districts are 20-50 feet from an arterial road and 5-15 feet from a side or rear yard. The proposed parking lot would meet the standard setback requirements for typical multi-family zoning districts set forth in the city code. The site plan shows future development of seven townhomes along the south side of the pri- vate street. Site issues related to the townhome development will be addressed at the time of submittal of development plans for the outlot. The original site plan showed the proposed private street being 24 feet wide. This would not al- low any on-street parking and would be difficult for emergency vehicles to maneuver. Staff sug- gested that the street be widened to 26 feet to allow for parking on one side and better emergency access. The on-street parking would help alleviate any future parking concerns associated with the proposed townhome development along the south side of the street. The revised plan show a 26-foot wide street with 10 parking spaces on the southwest side of the street. Those parking spaces will be in front of the future townhomes. Staff has some concern about having the parking spaces located across from the underground garage driveway and north driveway of the surface parking lot. That area should be signed "No Parking", which will result with the elimination of a minimum of four space. The site plan indicates that"No Parking" signage will be installed along the north side of the pri- vate street. Staff is recommending that the north curb be painted yellow and No Parking Fire Lane" signage be erected in place of the proposed "No Parking" signage. Several retaining walls varying in height from five to 13 feet high will be constructed on the site. Any retaining wall over four feet tall will require a building permit. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County,Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes August 5,2020 Page 5 of 13 Storm water ponds will be constructed in the southwest corner of the site, along the north side McAndrews Road, south of the private street; and in an area between the building and private street. The storm water ponds will collect storm water runoff from the site. The ponds located in front of the building and in the southeast corner of the site will pre-treat the runoff collected. A gazebo and two-foot high retaining wall will be located between storm water pond and surface parking lot. A water feature with a five-foot tall boulder wall will be located in the northeast corner of the site. A concrete patio area will abutt the pond and provide a nice amenity for the residents. Grading and Utilities: Mass grading of the site and installation of utilities will be needed to prepare it for development and the installation of utilities to serve the site will be necessary. The grading and utility plans have been reviewed by the City Engineer and his comments are included in the attached memo. The demo plan identifies four wells in the site that will be sealed and abandoned in place. It does not identify the location of a septic system and drain field. These elements will need to be removed as part of site development. Tree Inventory and Preservation Plan: Development of the site will result in the removal 5,933 caliper inches. Replacement shall occur in accordance with the City's Natural Re- sources Management Ordinance, which states that 10% of the total number of diameter inches of significant trees removed must be replaced within the subdivision. Landscape Plan: The landscape plans identify a variety of coniferous, ornamental and overstory trees as well as a variety of ornamental grasses, perennials and shrubs. The appli- cant will need to meet landscape requirements within the City's zoning ordinance, which requires that multi-family residential developments install landscaping (live plant material excluding sod) that will have a minimum cost of 2'/2% of the estimated building construction cost based on Means Construction Data. The applicant will need to submit a detailed plant- ing list for review and approval by City staff prior to issuance of a building permit. Three Lindens and one Northern Pin Oak trees are located in the McAndrews Road right-of- way. Those trees will need to be relocated outside of the right-of-way. Lighting Plan: City code requires that any light or combination of lights that cast light on any adjacent residential property shall not exceed one-half foot as measured from the prop- erty line. Their submitted lighting plan meets the requirements set forth in the code. Elevation Drawings: The exterior finish of the senior cooperative will be a combination of fiber cement lap siding, EDCO metal board and batten lap siding, metal siding, face brick, ashlar pattern modular block, and precast stone trim. City code requires that mul- CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County,Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes August 5,2020 Page 6 of 13 tiple residential buildings in multi-family zoning districts have an exterior finish con- sisting of at least 50% non-combustible, non-degradable and maintenance-free construc- tion materials such as face brick or natural stone, with the balance being non-manufac- tured, natural construction material such as plank cedar or redwood. Since this building will likely be located in a planned development-zoning district, specific requirements for exterior finishes on all buildings may be different than what is commonly required. Floor Plans: The garage floor plan shows 116 vehicle parking spaces, a bike repair and storage area, golf simulator room, hobby shop and car wash area. The vehicle parking spaces will be 10 feet wide and 18 feet long and will be accessed via a 24-foot wide drive aisle. Mechanical and utility rooms and the trash area will also be located in the garage level. The main floor will have 24 units and one guest suite. Included on this floor will be the main entry, lobby, offices/mail work room, great room, and fitness area. An outdoor ter- race will be located of the lobby and great room. The second floor will also have 24 units and one guest room; as well as a library, club room, and arts and crafts area. The third floor will have 28 units and the fourth floor will have 22 units. No common gathering/special use areas will be located on these floors. All units will have a patio or balcony, and storage units will be available on each floor. Street Classifications/Accesses/Circulation: The site is bounded by Pilot Knob Road (CSAH 31) on the west and McAndrews Road (CSAH 38) to the south. Both are A Minor Arterial roads, which have a design capacity of 5,000-30,000 vehicles a day. The 2017 vol- ume for McAndrews Road is 9,200 vehicle trips per day, west of Pilot Knob Road and 9,000 trips per day west of Pilot Knob Road. The 2040 forecast shows 11,200 trips west and 13,700 east of Pilot Knob Road. Pilot Knob Road has an existing volume, as of 2017, of 17,500 vehicle trips south and 20,500 trips north of McAndrews Road. The 2040 forecast shows 21,900 trips south and 27,000 north of McAndrews Road. The proposed senior cooperative will generate ap- proximately 364 trips per day and 52 trips will be generated by the seven townhome dwellings. A trip is defined as a single or one-way motor vehicle movement either to or from a subject property. Therefore, someone leaving a site to go shopping and returning to the site would be two trips. The trips generated from this site should not have an ad- verse impact on the general function of the roads. Access from the two public roadways to the private street will be limited to a right-in only intersection off Pilot Knob Road and a right-in/right-out only intersection off McAndrews Road. Right tum lanes will be constructed at both intersections and raised medians will be CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County,Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes August 5,2020 Page 7 of 13 extended in the roads to deter additional movements at those locations. The width of the pri- vate street at the Pilot Knob Road intersection will be shortened to 20 feet to restrict access directly to Pilot Knob Road. This will require the construction of a vehicle turnaround at the west end of the private street for vehicles going westbound. Because the project area is located adjacent to two minor arterial roads and a public golf course, access to public transit will be limited. However, transit providers,such as DARTS, Metro Mobility,and Transit Link provide services where regular route transit service is infre- quent or unavailable. Pedestrian Access: The site plan shows an internal network of private sidewalks. Bitumi- nous trails will be installed along the east side of Pilot Knob Road and the north side of McAndrews Road. Several connections from the internal sidewalks to the public trails have been made that will allow residents direct access to the public system. Signs: Monument signs are shown at the both street intersections. All signage shall comply with requirements set forth in the City's sign ordinance. Dakota County Review: Because the proposed subdivision is located adjacent to Pilot Knob and McAndrews Roads, which are both county roads, it is subject to review by the Dakota County Plat Commission. The Commission reviewed this development proposal on October 30, 2019. Their comments are included in the attached letter. Public Hearing Comments: The public hearing for this request was held on November 6, 2019. The hearing was opened, comments were taken and the hearing was closed. Staff has provided a synopsis of the comments from that hearing and staffs responses to those comments. Several comments and concerns were raised regarding the impact this development will have on traffic in the area. Those concerns included: • Potential cut through traffic in the Huntington neighborhood • U-tums at Pilot Knob Road/McAndrews Road intersection • Sightlines along McAndrews Road Staff Response - The applicant has provided a traffic memorandum that addresses the first two points. The sightline concern and U-turn movements were taken into consideration by Dakota County during their review and recommendations,which are included in the attached memo form the Plat Commission. The applicant has submitted information regarding poten- tial cut through traffic in the neighborhood, which is included with this report. Comments were received regarding the density of the project. Staff Response - The property is currently zoned M-6A (Multi- Family Residential),which allows for a density of 6 to 12 units per acre. The density being proposed is consistent with the current zoning. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County,Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes August 5,2020 Page 8 of 13 Comments were received regarding the lack of trails going northbound on Pilot Knob Road nor eastbound on McAndrews Road. Staff Response -Pathway sections will be constructed along the roadway sections that abut the subject property. Comments were received about the lack of shopping and services in the immediate area. Staff Response - The applicant has provided a map that shows the location of retail areas, which indicate that there are many retail opportunities within five miles of the site. A concern was raised about the number of trees that will be lost. Staff Response - Tree re- moval and replacement will be subject to the City's Natural Resources Management Ordi- nance, which requires that 10% of the total number of diameter inches of significant trees removed must be replaced with caliper inches within the subdivision. Because the applicant is requesting a rezoning to a planned development, the City will be able to negotiate with the developer on additional landscaping enhancements. A concern was raised about impact of the site's lighting will have the neighborhood. Staff Re- sponse - Any lighting used to illuminate an off-street parking area or sign shall be arranged so as to deflect light away from any adjoining residential zone or from the public streets. Direct glare from floodlights or similar sources, shall not be directed into any adjoining property or pub- lic streets, and all the source of all lights shall be hooded or controlled in some manner so as not to light adjacent property. In residential areas, any light or combination of lights that cast light on any adjacent residential property shall not exceed 1/2 foot candle (meter reading) as measured at the property line. Light- ing fixtures for new and renovated outdoor sports and recreational facilities that adjoin residen- tial uses shall be designed to eliminate reflected glare and spill light from the bottom one-third of the reflector, and to shield the view of the arc tube from the residential property. The petitioner has submitted a lighting plan,which identifies the location of streetlights,park- ing lot lights and light bollards along the private sidewalks. It appears that the onsite lighting is in conformance with city code. A question was raised on how long the temporary access off Pilot Knob Road will be there - Staff Response - The County stated that removal of the access will be consider at the time of development of the property located directly north and east of the property. That property is currently the site of the Valleywood Golf Course and there is no interest in redeveloping that property. A concern was expressed about whether there is adequate parking in this development. Staff Re- sponse - The proposed parking ration of 1.8 spaces per unit is consistent with other senior devel- opments in the city. The City has also requested that the private street serving the development have a minimum width of 26 feet, which will allow for on-street parking along the street's south side. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County,Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes August 5,2020 Page 9 of 13 Questions: Commissioner Burke - Concerning that noise could be an issue. Will noise mitigation be re- quired? Is it being addressed at this time? Answer: Usually when abut the roadway, noise mitigation is already considered and distance is put between the roadway and the development. Refers to slide 13 (LANDSCAPE PLAN) and shows ponding area on corner of PKR & McAndrews, buildings have a healthy set-back, both the Co-op and townhomes/villa. Refers to slide 11 (GRADING PLAN) does NOT show oppor- tunity for berming, but co-op building is still quite a distance away from roadway. Commissioner Burke—noise can become an issue but the report didn't fully explain. Report is County Plat Commission's letter Answer: comment is standard in the letter, when sent to a developer that will be building on a County road, to encourage noise mitigation Commissioner Kurtz - refers to slide 17 (OFFSITE VEHICLE MANUEVERING)which shows traffic turning right off of McAndrews onto PKR, and a third lane (to be added) on PKR for right-turn into development. She wanted clarification that a lane would be added. Answer: Yes, a lane would be added. PowerPoint introduced by Alex Hall,United Properties —comments on the noise of concern: they (UP)use a higher STC glass (a sound reducing glass), for example: a development in Bloomington that sits right on Lyndale Ave and in Minnetonka that sit right on Minnetonka Blvd which they have built on a 100' or so from the road, that utilize the special glass. Points out that Tom and Brandon have been a great help in navigating through the County re- quirements and the Comp Plan. For more than 100 years, we have been proud to create deep roots in our communities, we are especially honored when organizations and publications recognize our work. Owned by the Polad family (who also owns the Twins). Alex's group has been developing senior housing for 20 years: includes Applewood, Cherrywood, and The Pointe. Applewood—buy (for sale community)—targets younger, active seniors. Cherrywood— specifically for memory care. The Pointe—luxury rental option—targets younger, active seniors. A slide representing all the existing and future Applewood Pointes—full waiting lists and antici- pates sell-outs for those awaiting completion. What is a Senior Cooperative? • Cooperative units are "for-sale" housing. The cooperative by-laws require all homes to be owner occupied and prohibit renting of units (member of a corporation) • One owner must be 62+ CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County,Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes August 5,2020 Page 10 of 13 • 4 financing equity options—20%, 40%, 60%, 80% • Balance is a 40-year, fixed rate, HUD guaranteed master mortgage (no need of bank shopping) • 2% annual fixed appreciation—predictable pricing builds waitlist(allows for easier sell- ing/buying) • All Applewood Pointe Communities are professionally managed Very spacious common areas to promote sense community: a great room, craft area, library, game room, woodworking room. Community elects their own board and are responsible to manage the community, once project is complete. Senior Housing Helps Assure a Youthful City • Serves the long-term residents of your City, many have lived in the community 30 — 50 + years • Accommodates the lifecycle stage of the City's Livable Communities Act • Seniors typically will not move from single family homes without quality options.Pro- motes housing stock turnover and reinvestment in existing homes • Supports the school system —New residents in seniors' homes will be younger and likely have school-aged children • Adds to the tax base through the new senior housing development and reinvestment in single family homes Traffic—Senior Cooperative • Low traffic generator • 3.7 trips per unit per day • 23 peak a.m. trips; 29 peak p.m. trips. Residents avoid peak(rush hour) (as compared by 30,000 on PKR) • Comparison: Apartment 7.2 trips per day, Condominium 5.8 trips per day, Single Family 10.0 trips per day • Parking: 1.8 per unit—AWP Apple Valley Demand - Senior Population Growth (Age 70+) in the Seven County Twin Cities Metro Area—Years 2000 -2045 Why are we building senior housing? Why do we need to continue? - Identical to any major city (Denver) - 35 —285% grown - 300K to explode to 700K by 2045 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County,Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes August 5,2020 Page 11 of 13 • A market study concluded that there is unmet demand in the primary market area of: • 239 units in 2019 • 333 units in 2024 • AWP would need to capture only 45% of current excess demand to support our proposed 98-unit cooperative • AWP Eagan & Zvago are full w/waiting lists. • Extremely confident in the selling of the product. 60% of homes need to be sold prior to breaking ground. Therefore, not speculative. Site Plan & Features • Thoughtful design approach of a 3 & 4-story, 98-unit cooperative • The 4-stories allows for a smaller footprint, more landscaping and creates significant green open spaces (Allows for smaller footprint) • Building placed on back of site creates a gradual transition from lower to higher density at the intersection • 7 Villa Lots- site plan allows for low rise transitional detached townhomes • In relation to the golf course, visually appealing Applewood Pointe of Maple Grove at Arbor Lakes (slide) Attractive interior -NAIOP AWARDS OF EXCELLENCE Applewood Pointe of Champlin at Mississippi Crossings was awarded the NAIOP Awards of Excellence in the senior living category in 2019 and Applewood Pointe of Eagan was a runner up that year. United Properties has been awarded this honor for various property types in 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019. Exterior Amenities - Putting greens, Bacci ball, outdoor gathering, gazebo Questions? Commissioner Burke-we see a 20 year (population) growth, what about 40-50 years, does the curve start going down? United Properties: a slow decline and then a leveling off, a hard call for seniors down the road; but conversion to upscale apartments and condos is plausible. These are not "hard made"like assisted living units (small units and special services) that they will be easy enough to convert. Now geared for senior occupation. Commissioner Kurtz- commends on the colors Pope Architects: Zac Rosenow -Use of project board: - High quality materials - Blend of brick in warm gray tones w/vinyl window (meets 50%) CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County,Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes August 5,2020 Page 12 of 13 - Metal board&batten w/Fiber cement - Durable, extremely low maintenance - 30 year warranty No questions/comments from commissioners. No questions/comments from those in attendance. No questions/comments from virtual. MOTION: Commissioner Diekmann moves to recommend the rezoning of the 10.9-acre site located at 12444 Pilot Knob Road from "M6-A" (Multi-Family Residential/6-12 units per acre) to "PD" (Planned Development) and that staff be directed to prepare an ordinance to codify the uses, performance standards and area requirements for the planned develop- ment. Commissioner Kurtz seconds. No discussion Ayes -6 Nays- 0 Motion carries MOTION: Commissioner Diekmann moves to recommend approval of the preliminary plat of the 10.9-acre site into one lot and one outlot subject to the conditions as outlined in the staff report. Commissioner Kurtz seconds. No discussion Ayes -6 Nays- 0 Motion carries MOTION: Commissioner Diekmann moves to recommend approval of the site plan/building permit authorization to allow for the construction of a 3-4 story/98-unit senior cooperative building on Lot 1, Block 1,Applewood Pointe of Apple Valley, subject to the conditions outlined in the staff report. Commissioner Kurtz seconds. No discussion Ayes -6 Nays - 0 Motion carries Moves forward to City Council on August 27ch B. Review of upcoming schedule and other updates. Community Development Director Bruce Nordquist commends the Commission on how well this first combined physical and virtual Planning Commission meeting was handled since the shutdown of the Chambers in March due to COVID-19. The next regular Planning Commission Meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, August 19th at 7pm. Commission Melander thanks the technical staff that made this possible, as well as working through and coordinating all the virtual meetings. 8. ADJOURNMENT Hearing no further comments from the Planning Staff or Planning Commission, Chair Melander CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County,Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes August S,2020 Page 13 of 13 asked for a motion to adjourn. MOTION: Commissioner Kurtz moved, seconded by Commissioner AIwin to adjourn the meeting at 8:02 p.m. Rollcall vote: Ayes- 6 - Nays - 0. Respectfully Submitted, Mari Salamanca,Planning Department Assistant /-Z�e Approved by the Apple Valley Planning Commis on 8/19/2020 Tom Melander, Chair