Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/20/1988CITY OF APPLE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JULY 20, 1988 Minutes of the Planning Commission of the City of Apple Valley held Wednesday, July 20, 1988, at 7:30 p.m. at the Apple Valley City Hall. PRESENT: Chairperson Robert Erickson; Commission Members Richard Carlson, Marcia Gowling, Virginia Sterling. Staff Members Dennis Welsch, Rick Kelley, Meg McMonigal, Keith Gordon. Fifty members of the public. ABSENT: Alan Felkner, Frank Kleckner, Phillip Peterson. 1. Chairperson Erickson called the meeting to order at 7:39 p.m. 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Approval of the Minutes of June 15 in addition to the listed Minutes of June 1, 1988 should be included in Item 3. MOTION: of Carlson, seconded by Gowling to approve the agenda as amended. VOTE: Yes, 4; No, 0. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF JUNE 1, 1988.. MOTION: of Carlson, seconded by Gowling, to approve the Minutes of June 1, 1988, as presented. Yes, 3 (Erickson, Carlson, Gowling); No, 0; Abstain, 1 (Sterling). APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF June 15, 1988. MOTION: of Carlson, seconded by Gowling, to approve the Minutes of June 15, 1988, as presented. Yes, 3 (Erickson, Carlson, Gowling); No, 0; Abstain, 1 (Sterling). 4. CONSENT AGENDA: No items were presented. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Preliminary Plat and rezoning for Nordic Woods 6th Addition. LOCATION: Northeast Corner of Galaxie Ave. & 132nd St. West. PETITIONER: M. W. Johnson Construction, Inc. Chair Erickson opened the Public Hearing with the standard opening remarks. Mr. Kelley made a verbal presentation based upon the Staff Petition Report dated July 20, 1988, for a Planned Development Zoning Amendment and Preliminary Plat for a mixed residential development containing 22 zero lot line single fam- ily units, seven townhouse units, and three 8- plexes. Mr. Carlson was told that the City Council did not approve the recommendation PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 20, 1988 Page 2 from the Planning Commission that a moratorium be placed on the con- struction of small 0 lot line single - family homes. Mr. Steve Grousky, representing M. W. Johnson, indicated that they received Staff's Report and will redesign the westerly cul -de- sac to provide for a direct connection to the north as requested. In 1984, preliminary plat approval was received for the construction of 123 rental units. This project has reduced to 53 units to sell; this will be in accordance with the lower amount allowed by the Comprehen- sive Plan. Ms. Sterling questioned if purchasing the vacant lot abutting the western cul -de -sac had been considered. Mr. Grousky was not familiar with this, but indicated they would provide access to this lot from their development. Ms. Gowling questioned if - this might be the best use for this property. Mr. Grousky indicated that M. W. Johnson does try to maintain as many trees as possible; the units will be 1450 to 1700 sq. ft. with all having double garages. Speaking from the Public: 1. Mr. John Shier, 6935 133rd Ct., AV: commented that the entire development, including the homes that C. W. Johnson has built thus far, contains very large homes. This development would have a much higher density than the surrounding parcels, and this seems very much in variance with what has been done thus far. Mr. Kelley explained the reasons for planning higher density as one approaches the intersection of two major roads. This designation for this parcel was established before the first home in Nordic Woods was built. It was noted that the developer already has City approval for a 123 unit apartment project. Ms. Sterling was told that the owner does not have an alternate plan at this time for the very corner (exception piece) of property. 2. Mr. Mark Fuller, 1031 14th Ave., SE, Mpls., representative for Eleanor and George Matchette, owner of the property adjoining this proposed development from the westerly cul- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 20, 1988 Page 3 de -sac, commented that this plan limits the use of their property from a marketing standpoint. Mr. Carlson indicated that, to a certain degree, available options for the unplatted piece would be limited if all of this area is not developed or at least planned at the same time. He would like to see this all developed at the same time if at all possible. Chair Erickson commented that all the Commission can do is to encourage the developer to talk with the property owner and attempt to come to some agreement; the City does not have a legal vehicle to enforce this. Mr. Carlson said that he would have a serious issue with allowing the petitioner to put an apartment complex in there; there could be problems at a later date. Rental property next to owner -owned property is a concern. 3. Ms. Pat Sutila, 13880 Pennock Ave., AV: requested that M. W. Johnson Construction make it clear in the preliminary drawings that the road will be extended to the undeveloped portion. No further comments were received from the public; therefore, Chair Erickson closed Public Hearing with the standard closing remarks. B. Conditional Use Permit for Gas Pump and Curb Cut at American Transportation System. LOCATION: Southeast Corner of Pilot Knob Road and 140th St. West. PETITIONER: American Transportation, Inc. Chair Erickson opened the Public Hearing with the standard opening remarks. Mr. Kelley presented the Staff Petition Report dated July 20, 1988, for a Conditional Use Permit for motor fuel dispensers, reconsideration of site plan review, and Building Permit authorization for a school bus garage, including a curb cut for direct driveway access to Johnny Cake Ridge Road. Chair Erickson asked how did the building grow? He indicated a 125' building was approved and what steps did the Petitioner take to get a 148' wide building. The petitioner, Mr. Robert Reagan, apologized for his ignorance for not giving this more thought. He explained the use of a credit card for gas purchases and after considering this loca- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 20, 1988 Page 4 tion, felt having his own pumps would make his operation more efficient. The reason for the increase in the size of the building is that two additional bays have been added. A bus in need of repairs can be brought in, more room for setbacks is allowed, and a drive through is included (was not in the first plan). He has talked with the adjacent businesses and asked to use their curb cuts and both said, "No, "; thus, he asked for his own. Chair Erickson commented that the traffic flow was discussed and there seemed to be no problem initially, but now a second curb cut is needed and this bothers him. The petitioner said that this wouldn't cause that much conges- tion since there would be only 20 busses in and out. Ms. Sterling was told that the only time busses would be outside would be in the event of a chartered bus taking a group and returning after the terminal is closed. She expressed concern about the requested curb cut and also about the fact that only two months ago it was fine to use a gas credit card, thus not needing their own pumps. The petitioner explained that the problem is the DISTANCE to travel to fill the busses. He is requesting a dual pump for diesel and no -lead fuel. He also wishes his own pumps in the event of a future fuel shortage. The Commission was concerned that none of this was an issue only two months ago. The Petitioner currently has a contract with ISO #196. The curb cut would be 40 -45' from the property to the south; from a planning standpoint, 125' is the minimum separ- ation. Chair Erickson closed the Public Hearing with the stan- dard closing remarks. C. Preliminary Plat, Rezoning, and Conditional Use Permit for Motor Fuel for East Valley Plaza. LOCATION: Southeast Corner of Pilot Knob Rd. & 140th St. West. PETITIONER: Dreher & Associates, Inc. Chair Erickson opened the Public Hearing with the standard opening remarks. Mr. Kelley made a verbal presentation based upon the Staff Petition Report dated July 20, 1988, for a Rezoning to "RB," Condi- tional Use Permit for Motor Fuel Sales and Preliminary Plat for 4 lots. The rear of the property would be treated with the same build- ing materials as the primary structure. The Petitioner, Mr. Dick Dreher, introduced associates he had brought to the meeting to answer any questions and presented their plans for a small, convenience retail center to serve persons within a 1 to 1 1/2 mile radius including a grocery store, gas pumps, and additional PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 20, 1988 Page 5 retail space. Approximately eight shops are planned along the 140th St. frontage. Discussion of the traffic flow from the south to the proposed center ensued. Mr. Dreher would like to work with Mr. Pat Hallisey, owner of the adjoining convenience center, and the City to create a logical and convenient flow of traffic so that there is no need to get back on a major highway. Mr. Kelley explained the joint agreement regarding the flow of traf- fic, and the recommendation would be made to the City Council to continue this easement agreement. Mr. Carlson commented on the possibility of the retail shops being a draw for the middle school students and the Petitioner said, "A VIDEO ARCADE WILL NOT BE INCLUDED." This will be a family- oriented neigh- borhood center. Ms. Gowling was told that trash containers will be enclosed in an area of the same building material as the structure itself; only the very top of the enclosure will be seen, not the dumpster at all. With the berming that is planned, and the placement of lights, neigh- bors will hardly be aware of the building. The only signage in back will be a very small one identifying the store itself. There will be no loading docks at the rear of the building. The petitioner indi- cated that a friend had developed a similar center at the intersec- tion of C. R. #42 and C. R. 11, Summit Oaks. The petitioner has larger centers he has developed up north at MN 47 and C. R. 116 and at C. R. 101 and MN 7. Speaking from the Public: 1. Mr. Pat Hallisey, owner of the adjoining center, commented that he had two concerns: 1. 141st St. extension - -this will be done at the petitioner's expense totally so that the Taylors are not assessed; he feels this would be a fairer way to do this in the future. Mr. Gordon commented that he would be involved in the en- gineering and the City would own the street, but the devel- oper would pay the cost of installation. 2. interconnect- -there is a lot unknown about what would happen and he echoes the sentiments of Mr. Kelley. The situation worked extremely well to the benefit of all three developers, it does work, and it can work in the future. He would like to see some type of revision to this joint agreement as a part of the approval process. Mr. Kelley read the terms of the joint agreement and indi- cated this can be worked out between the parties. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 20, 1988 Page 6 2. Mr. Frank Omerlian, 14201 Ensley, AV: questioned the legality of what could the portions of land could be zoned as with Mr. Kelley explaining the northern parcel could be designated RB and the southern portion as RB on a part of it with some LB. He suggested if a master plan is developed for the remainder of the property that feedback be solicited from the neighbors sur- rounding the property. He requested that construction dust be limited as much as possible. Methods of curtailing, but not eliminating, this problem were discussed. 3. Mr. Jerry Archer of PDQ representing the owner, Mr. Jim Sheldon, AV: indicated they are considerably more concerned about the cross- easement agreement. Mr. Kelley commented that in crossing a public street, you really do not want driveways to line up, you want to make sure there is room for stack spaces. Mr. Archer would like to see something resolved on this. The petitioner indicated he is open to curb cut locations. Chair Erickson indicated the stipulation should be included for cross - parking easements acceptable to all parties. Mr. Archer expressed concern that a convenience center this size serving people in a 1 to 1 1/2 mile radius would be basically somewhat a duplication of their present business. He also felt this was targeted for a larger development than the proposal. Chair Erickson urged Staff to work out the cross easements with all three parties. Chair Erickson closed the Public Hearing with the standard closing remarks. MOTION: of Gowling, seconded by Sterling to recommend approval for a rezoning from "A" to "RB" for parcel 012 -25. DISCUSSION: The question was asked if the parcel is large enough to include a restaurant other than just a fast -food type facility with the answer being that within the development a small sit -down family restaurant will be built. VOTE: Yes, 4; No, 0. MOTION: of Gowling, seconded by Sterling to recommend approval of a Preliminary Plat of East Valley Plaza. VOTE: Yes, 4; No, 0 MOTION: of Gowling, seconded by Sterling, to approve a Conditional Use Permit for motor fuel sales on Lot 1, Block 1, East Valley Plaza, subject to these conditions: 1. Any overhead PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 20, 1988 Page 7 lights in the canopy should be designed so that light is cast downward only and does not spill out horizontally; 2. fuel dispensing P. A. system not to be used for advertising; 3. The first manhole picking up storm water from the fuel dispensing area must be constructed with a skimmer system tc separate and hold any gasoline spills and deemed appro- priate by the City Staff. MOTION: of Gowling, seconded by Carlson, to recommend approval of a Building Permit authorization, subject to clarification on rear loading door placement and treatment and further sub- ject to trash enclosures being constructed of the same mate- rials as the primary building. AMENDMENT to the MOTION: by Gowling, seconded by Carlson, to include size of the enclosures, height of the berm, and the parapet lighting and sound. VOTE on the MOTION as AMENDED: Yes, 4; no, 0. Chair Erickson urged Staff to work with all parties to arrive at a satisfactory conclusion to this proposal and to the cross - easements. Rezoning and Preliminary Plat for Fenner /Brown Plat. LOCATION: 12906 AND 12936 Galaxie Avenue. PETITIONER: Richard & LaVerne Fenner, Robert & Nancy Brown. Chair Erickson opened the Public Hearing with the standard opening remarks. Ms. McMonigal made a verbal presentation based upon the Staff Petition Report dated July 20, 1988, for Rezoning and Preliminary Plat for a single family develop- ment to include 12 lots. Speaking from the Public: 1. Mr. Ronald Kjeloahl, 12840 Foliage Ave., AV: was told the homes will be comparable to those in Nordic Woods -- $150,000 and up. Mr. Douglas Hansen, 12850 Foliage Ave., AV: asked if the planned access is reasonable for 12 lots. Nordic Woods 8th Addition will probably be developed with a low- density condo or an institutional use and thus the access should be adequate. Mr. Hansen expressed concern over more traffic through a restrictive area with Staff indicating it is preferable to come through on Foliage and 129th St. Ct. in order to restrict the access as much as possible given the proximity to TH 77. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 20, 1988 Page 8 Mr. Kjeloahl indicated he feels this could become a very congested area if 10 -12 townhomes are constructed and a church. The Fire and Police Departments are in agree- ment this is the best possible access to the property. The Petitioner indicated they would like to begin developing the property as soon as permission is received from the Planning Com- mission and the City Council. Chair Erickson closed the Public Hearing with the standard closing remarks. MOTION: of Sterling, seconded by Gowling, to recommend approval of the Rezoning from R -1A to R -1C. VOTE: Yes, 4 No, 0. MOTION: of Gowling, seconded by Carlson, to recommend approval of the Preliminary Plat for this 12 -lot single family develop- ment. VOTE: Yes, 4; No, 0. LAND USE /ACTION ITEMS: Consideration of Rezoning and Ridge Townhouses. LOCATION: Between Pennock Zoo Road. Preliminary Plat for Palomino and Cedar Avenues, south of the PETITIONER: St. Croix Development, Inc. and Wellington Mgmt., Inc. Mr. Kelley made a verbal presentation based upon the Staff Petition Report dated July 20, 1988, for further consideration of a Rezoning to "M -1 ", "M -2" and Preliminary Plat containing 102 dwelling unit rental townhouses: Palomino Ridge Townhomes. Results of the traffic study indicate the townhomes would result in a negligible traffic increase and thus would not have an im- pact on Pennock Ave. The Petitioner has indicated his will- ingness to include a right turn only either with a sign or me- dian to force any of the residents of the proposal to use the Cedar Ave. north /south connection instead of Pennock and has indicated this in his sketch. Mr. Wellington, the Petitioner, reiterated his willingness to install a right -turn only median or a sign as desired. He again stressed the quality of the project - -brick with cedar and if a person were to visit Cedar Lake Shores they would get a feel for the proposed project. Six units per acre is at the very low end of the scale. He expressed their desire to save as many trees as possible and to provide the highest - quality PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 20, 1988 Page 9 project possible. He also indicated they would provide public education materials to all their residents about traffic and safety conditions on Pennock. Chair Erickson recognized those from the Public who wished to speak in order to provide NEW INFORMATION even though THIS WAS NOT A PUBLIC HEARING. Speaking from the Public: 1. Ms. Bihari Desai, 13470 Pennock Ave., AV: indicated that she believes it is not right; she believes there will be more than 25 cars per day one way; she is concerned about $600 rent - -this is not the kind of houses in The Oaks and surrounding areas; this is a matter of integrity of the two neighbors. Chair Erickson indicated he was going to rule - -these items have been discussed; Staff has no reason to think the traf- fic study is not correct. 2. Mr. Joe Sutica, 13880 Pennock, AV: indicated that he spearheaded a traffic study on Pennock between 138th and 140th Streets. On July 14, the City Council was addressed and what was read from the letter tonight regarding the traffic study conducted by the City's consultant is not what he told City Council last week. There are 2200 cars per day coming through on Pennock Ave. There are 24 signs in a two -block area, Pennock has a center stripe, and this has not helped the traffic situation. He does not believe there are any new plans to divert the traffic. People perceive it is faster to get to downtown via Pennock Ave. rather than Cedar. Cedar Ave. is the most expensive and best road and people refuse to use it. They have been fighting this situation for 18 months. Pennock is being used as a neighborhood collector and he cannot envision 25 more cars per day using it. He contended that what Mr. Kelley read from the letter is not what Mr. Van Wormer, the consultant, told the City Council last week. Mr. Kelley replied one of the main points from the traffic consultant is that there are no easy answers to the Pennock Ave. traffic problem and that secondly, he DID NOT ADDRESS the site issue at the City Council meeting; this was addressed later. Chair Erickson agreed completely that there are some very serious problems on Pennock Ave. The Commission is trying to advise neighbors of the impact of additional traffic on this project. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 20, 1988 Page 10 3. Mr. Ross Glynn, 13349 Granada Ave., AV: indicated that he would seriously question the validity of the consultant's report without seeing the method by which he conducted it; this is not available and he does not believe this informa- tion as presented can be taken at face value. Chair Erickson indicated this was a very thorough study and there is no reason on their part to question the accuracy of the report. He indicated the Commission would proceed with this item. MOTION: of Gowling, from "R1 -A" conformance Plan. DISCUSSION: seconded by Carlson, to recommend the rezoning to "M -1" and "M -2" as requested since it is in with the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Guide Could medians be added to this motion? Mr. Kelley commented this would be a perform- - ance standard and would probably be incor- porated with consideration of the plat; this motion is only consideration of land use and not layout. Chair Erickson commented that Mr. Phillip Peterson called to state that his only con- cerns were regarding traffic and if the traf- fic problems were resolved, he wished to go on record stating he is in favor of building this development. VOTE: Yes, 4; No, 0. MOTION: of Gowling, seconded by Carlson, to recommend approval of the Preliminary Plat. AMENDMENT to the MOTION: of Gowling, seconded by Carlson, to include subject to either a right -turn only signage or me- dian according to Staff's requirements in Block 2 to force the traffic to proceed north. DISCUSSION: Ms. Sterling indicated that she is still concerned about the right -turn only if some- body wishes to go left and this would create more of a hazard. Mr. Carlson said that he, too, thought of this. There will be a 3 -way stop at the intersection until 1990. VOTE ON THE MOTION AS AMENDED: Yes, 4; No, 0 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 20, 1988 Page 11 B. Preliminary Plat for Eagle Ponds Addition. LOCATION: East of Galaxie Ave., South of Greenleaf Elementary School. PETITIONER: Joe Sweet and Bill Coady. Mr. Kelley made a verbal presentation based on the Staff Petition Report dated July 20, 1988, for consideration of a Preliminary Plat containing 23 lots for detached single family homes. The road extension (Garrett Ave.) would be done by the City at an appropriate time. A small portion of the park property may be considered for disposal. These two items will not be considered at this time by the Planning Commission or City Council - - these are some things that could occur in the future. This project is too small to warrant an EAW according to the EQB. Ms. Sterling was told that a pedestrian access to the park could be con- structed coming up to the road if desired. Mr. Kelley explained the difference between an Outlot (in this case Outlot E) and Dedicated Park. He is not aware of any way this designation can be changed from Outlot E to Dedicated Park. Mr. William Skokan commented that he had purchased his lot with the green area with the understanding that this would remain green, and now the City wants to go through with a road. This was dedicated as park and he takes issue with removing a portion of this land from the park. Even though THIS WAS NOT A PUBLIC HEARING, Chair Erickson ind- icated that the Planning Commission would listen to any NEW comments: Speaking from the public: 1. Mr. Ray Anderson, 13813 Gladiola Way, AV: commented on the legal technicality and indicated a lot of people purchased homes with the intention that this was park and would STAY PARK. He also expressed concern that very few of the per- sons in that neighborhood received letters, and Mr. Kelley explained the legal notice requirements with Mr. Anderson requesting the entire neighborhood would like to be kept informed. 2. Mr. William J. Skokan, 13819 Gladiola Way, AV: commented that he is concerned that a portion of the park area could become swampy and that fill is needed. Mr. Gordon will review this situation and respond to this concern. 3. Mr. Dave Mieras, 13801 Gladiola Way, AV: said that it looks as if it would be difficult to make a connection between the lower and upper part of Garrett and an S turn would be needed. Grades would be approximately 10 %, ac- cording to Mr. Gordon. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 20, 1988 Page 12 4. John and Julie McCann, 13807 Gladiola Way, AV: Ms. McCann commented that in speaking with Park Director Randy Johnson back in March or April, he indicated that the Park Commit- tee had decided it would be a good idea to disperse of the land. She questioned why they were never informed of that meeting with Mr. Kelley explaining that all Committee meet- ings are open to the Public and no formal notification is required. Mr. Skokan again said that he is real concerned about eliminating the green area. MOTION: of Carlson, seconded by Gowling, to recommend approval of of the Preliminary Plat of Eagle Pond subject to a street curvature on the west road interconnection as shown of "Staff Exhibit A" and further subject to the possible dele- tion of the east street interconnection and creation of one additional lot as shown on "Staff Exhibit B ". DISCUSSION: Mr. Carlson wished to go on record that his motion is NO INTENTION THAT GARRETT AVE. BE EXTENDED AT THIS TIME. AMENDMENT to the MOTION: of Carlson, seconded by Gowling, to include - -with the final determination to be made at the time of final plat approval. VOTE on the MOTION as AMENDED: Yes, 4; No, 0. Consideration of Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning and Preliminary Plat for Biewald First Addition. LOCATION: 14618 Cedar Avenue. PETITIONER: Mr. Karl H. Biewald. Ms. McMonigal made the verbal presentation based on her Memo to the Chair and Planning Commission Members dated June 15, 1988.. MOTION: of Carlson, seconded by Sterling, to recommend that the Comprehensive Plan Amendment be approved changing the designation of Biewald First Addition from D -3 to LB. VOTE: Yes, 4; No, 0. MOTION: of Carlson, seconded by Sterling to recommend approval of the rezoning to LB, Biewald First Addition. VOTE: Yes, 4; No, 0. MOTION: of Carlson, seconded by Sterling, to recommend approval of the Preliminary Plat, Biewald First Addition. VOTE: Yes, 4; No, 0. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 20, 1988 Page 13 Setback Variances for Cherry Oaks Estates. LOCATION: Lots 7, 13 -15, Block 1 and Lots 1 & 3, Block 2. PETITIONER: Leet Wilson. Mr. Kelley made the verbal presentation based on the Staff Peti- tion Report dated July 20, 1988, for blanket frontyard setback variances to build houses to within 20 feet of the front lot line rather than 30 feet required by ordinance. Mr.Wilson indicated that he also request Lot 10 because a great deal of fill had been removed causing the topography to have changed. The drainage problem on this lot would be great; he would appreciate a second look at Lot 10 from City Staff. MOTION: of Carlson, seconded by Gowling, to recommend that a 10 foot frontyard setback variance be approved for Lots 7 and 13, 14, and 15, Block 1 and Lots 1 and 3, Block 2, Cherry Oak Estates, due to the substantial hardship created by the existing topographic condi- tions. DISCUSSION: The Commission would like to have feed back from Mr. Gordon's engineering report regarding Lot 10, Block 2. Staff has looked at Lot 10 but would be agreeable to look at it again. VOTE: Yes, 4; No, 0. Front Yard Setback Variance. LOCATION: 912 Oriole Drive. PETITIONER: Richard Russell. Mr. Kelley made the verbal presentation based on the Staff Peti- tion Report dated July 20, 1988, for a front and side yard set- back variance for a garage addition to a single family resi- dence. Mr. Russell had letters from his surrounding neighbors indicating their agreement with his planned expansion. Mr. Russell explained his plan for an energy- saving entry way. Ms. Sterling indicated that she had no problems with the 11' addition to the garage and there is no problem with the extension coming forward; he is improving his property and the neighbors do not object. MOTION: of Sterling, seconded by Gowling, to recommend approval of a variance for an addition to the garage and an entry way addition at 912 Oriole Drive according to plans submitted by the Petitioner. AMENDMENT to the MOTION: by Sterling, seconded by Gowling, to include that the reason for this variance to allow the garage be extended 11' (instead of 8') is in order PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 20, 1988 Page 14 for the petitioner to comply with the City's Ordinance requiring vehicles be parked on paved surfaces and the hardship created by having a single car garage. VOTE on the MOTION as AMENDED: Yes, 4; No, 0 Site Review for Portable Classroom. LOCATION: Scott Highlands Elementary School. PETITIONER: ISO #196. Ms. McMonigal made the verbal presentation based on the Staff Petition Report dated July 20, 1988, for two portable classrooms to be placed on site. MOTION: of Carlson, seconded by Gowling, to recommend approval of the Site Plan for the portable classrooms at Scott Highlands Middle School /Highland Elementary School site. VOTE: Yes, 4; No, 0. DISCUSSION ITEMS. A. Council Action of June 30, 1988, verbal report by Mr. Dennis Welsch: City Council tabled the Capital Improvements Plan; one lot of Apple Valley Apartments was approved (not the land - scaping plan); approved office building at 143 St. and Cedar, the road being now under construction. Comprehensive and Current Planning Fall Schedule (Staff). Discussion occurred as the best way to conduct the necessary business and to include a work session. The idea of one meeting a month for the Public Hearings, etc. and one meeting a month for a work session /deep thought, or the pre- meeting process as work session. The idea of a combination meeting, beginning at 6:15 for a work session (box lunch provided), with the regular meeting at 7:30, will be conducted on August 16. C. Zoning or Other Code Improvement Suggestions. Mr. Welsch would like to take the latitude of putting on the agenda ideas for improvements you want, if any, at any monthly meeting. Chair Erickson commented that he felt the City would be better ahead just to do a blanket rezoning. D. Park Committee Minutes of July 5, 1988. The Committee did not meet on this date. E. Status of Current Environmental Reviews. 1. Sand and Gravel Operations South of C. R. #42. EIS has been received; the City Attorney has looked at the possibility of a moratorium on all sand and gravel opera- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 20, 1988 Page 15 tions with two different draft ordinances, but City Council Members individually are not interested. Chair Erickson feels there might be some merit to the idea, and he wonders if there may be the need for a second legal opinion. The Mayor has recommended hiring a consultant to review the EIS that will be forthcoming from Fischer Sand and Gravel. The comment period for the Environmental Review has closed. Staff is planning a scoping decision listing all issues which will be addressed in the EIS. The time line is 280 days, maximum. 2. Huntington 2nd Addition. The comment period is closed. There was a negative declaration on the need for an EIS. Very minor potential impacts were noted. 3. Apple Valley Apartments. The comment period is open until July 27; the general sentiments from the neighborhood com ments are adverse impacts. Staff does not believe there will be problems. Chair Erickson commented on the problem with the promises of homes being built in the 60's (tops, 70's) on the narrow lots, but in reality the developer ends up constructing a product starting at 90 +. A product is promised, and variances are granted, but the product is not delivered. How can we be assured of development as promised? This concern needs to be addressed. 8. Other Business -- Consider Special Meeting, August 3, 1988. There is no need to hold a meeting August 3, 1988. ADJOURN MOTION: of Carlson, seconded by Gowling, to adjourn the meeting at 12:06 a.m. VOTE: Yes, 4; No, 0. APPROVED SECRETARY