HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/16/1987 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
September 16 1987
Minutes of the meeting of the Apple Valley Planning Commission held Wednesday,
September 16, 1987, at 7;30 p.m. at the Apple Valley City Hall.
PRESENT: Chairperson Robert Erickson; Commission Members Richard Carlson,
Marcia Gowling, Frank Kleckner, Phillip Peterson, Virginia Sterling;
Staff Members Rick Kelley, Meg McMonigal, Keith Gordon; eight members
of the public.
ABSENT: Arleigh Thorberg.
1. Chairperson Erickson called the meeting to order at 7;30 p.m.
2. Approval of Agend4.
Mr. Kelley indicated that Item 8a. Sketch Plan, Office Warehouse, be
added to the agenda for tonight's meeting: AGENDA
MOTION: of Carlson, seconded by Sterling, to approve the agenda as
amended.
VOTE. Yes, 6; No, 0.
3. Approval of Minutes'of August 19, 1987.
MOTION- of Carlson, seconded by Sterling, to approve the minutes
Of August 19, 1987, as presented. MINUTES
VOTE: Yes, 4; No, 0; Abstain, 2 (Gowling, Peterson). AUG. i
4. Public Hearing for Preliminary Plat -- Skipper's Site.
LOCATION Northeast corner of County Road #42 and Cedar Ave. PH, PRE'
PETITIONER Oxboro Development Company. PLAT
SKIPPER
Chairperson Erickson opened the Public Hearing with the standard SITE
opening remarks. Mr. Kelley presented the preliminary plat petition
to subdivide a parcel of land into two separate parcels requiring
a variance to lot standards. Two variances would be required- -one to
the subdivision requirements that all lots abut a public street and the
other to the zoning requirement that every lot in the district be a
minimum of 100 feet wide at its street frontage. Mr. Kelley reviewed
the comments of City Attorney Michael Dougherty regarding ground lease and
fee ownership, the Cityfs rightful view of Parcel B, and driveway access and
cross- parking easements under the terms of the lease between the landlord and
Skipper',. Lengthly discussion followed during which Mr. Neil Polstein,
the lawyer for the petitioner, indicated his reactions rather than opinions
to Mr. Doughtery's letters. He felt a better mechanism regarding the parking
lot situation would be the have an easement granted and have the City enabled
to veto any changes- -there was never any intention on the part of the petition
to have the City as a party to the easement agreement. He indicated they woul
be opened to the suggestion to have a townhome type association for "'mainte—
nance" of the parking lot, but Mr. Polstein felt the best way to handle the
situation'is through easements. In commenting on ground lease and fee
ownership, Mr. Polstein indicated that Skipper's has no intent to give up
control of this property as long as anyone can contemplate. (A proposed
easement agreement has been sent to the City Attorney which will be included
in the October 7 packet. Chairperson Erickson indicated there is no
strong opposition to this proposal, but the mechanics of how to make it work
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
September 16, 1987
Page 2
need to be clearly defined. Mr. Carlson suggested that the petitioner
meet with Mr. Kelley and the City Attorney to define the mechanics from
the City's perspective and he felt this would be favorable to the Planning
Commission. This information will be ready for the October 7 meeting.
No one from the Public wished to speak to this public hearing.
Ms. Sterling questioned if the Planning Commission could hear how Skipper's
reacts to this plan; the petitioner indicated he would get a response from
Skipper's eventhough they have already signed a purchase agreement.
Mr. Kleckner indicated that he felt Staff should be provided with a copy of
the purchase agreement.
Chairperson Erickson closed the public hearing with the standard closing
remarks.
5. Public Hearing for Preliminary Plat and Conditional Use Permit for
SuperAmerica.
LOCATION Southeast corner of C. R. #42 and Garrett Ave. PH, PRE
or
PI�iT &
PETITIONER SuperAmerica. COND. 3
Chairperson Erickson opened the public hearing with the standard USE
opening remarks with Mr. Kelley presenting the petition for a preli-
minary plat to create one commercial lot and a Conditional Use Permit
for motor fuel sales. The building pad and overhead canopy meet the
required setbacks, but the parking lot /drive area adjacent to Garrett Ave.
must have a 20 foot setback instead of the 10 foot setback indicated and
the driveway entrance must have a setback of 100 feet from the C. R. #42
row rather than the 80' indicated. Parking stalls would have to be
provided. The petitioners, Mr. Karl Kaupp and Mr. Bill Perris, indicated
they did not know if they would eventually develop the property to the south- -
there are no plans at this time. The existing metal hangar will be removed.
They indicated there is amply room to meet the required setbacks. Ms. Sterlis
questioned if they would be willing to install a second entrance and thus
expand the proposal south. The petitioner will study the plan for the
possibility of the second entrance. Mr. Carlson expressed concern about
the City becoming saturated with motor fuel outlets with Mr. Kelley indicatinf
that they look at the total expected population and feel ultimately there
will be enough demand. Mr. Erickson indicated he shares that concern and
he sees operations that do not survive because of access. Mr. Peterson
indicated he felt this would be a convenient location and with the amount
of traffic in that area, two driveways would be needed. Ideas from Commission
members as to how to best accomplish two accesses were shared. Mr. Carlson
indicated that perhaps by making the driveway larger, a second entrance may
not be needed.
Mr. Kleckner left the meeting at 8;35 p.m.
Speaking from the Public;
1. Ms. Sarah Mardell, 18918 Denmark Ave., AV. indicated that she, along wit]
her husband, own the property directly across the street and questioned
planned landscaping. Mr. Kaupp indicated that it would be landscaped
similarly to other SuperAmerica outlets -- landscaping would be done well!
The area will be bermed heavily in order to keep the lights from the
cars parking in the 16 spaces from shining across the street. The buildii
will be 2,200 square feet.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
September 16, 1987
Page 3
Me. Sterling cautioned that the Sign Ordinance be checked before they
erected their sign planned for the northwest corner.
Chairperson Erickson closed the public hearing with the standard
closing remarks.
6. Sketch Plan Review for Single Family Development.
LOCATION On Pilot Knob Road, Y2 mile south of C. R. # 42. SKETCH
PETITIONER John Broback. PLAN RE
SINGLE
Mr. Kelley presented the sketch plan for 66 lots, detached single FAMILY
family dwellings. Mr. Gordon commented on utilities : - sanitary DEVELOP
seder runs across the Fischer property and at present, it is about
1,000 feet from the property in either of two directions. It could
be brought down from Pilot Knob Rd. or come across on an easement from
Dodd Road. Water could come from Apple Valley East. Storm sewer could
be run in Dodd Rd. and drain into'a major pond in the park. He indicated
costs would be approximately $100,000.00 including cost of easements.
Discussion ensued as to the' location of gravel operations and the compatabilit
with future - gravel operations. Mr. Carlson indicated housing and gravel
operations are not compatible in any mannar4 The Petitioner indicated he
had purchased the parcel in 1983 and the zoning is institutional and ie
planning'to actively market the property and if not as single family,lwiein
the conforming use as decided by the City. Lenghtly discussion ensued regardi
gravel operations /housing with Mr. Carlson indicating from his personal
experience that he could not endorse voting for a single family development
because of the potential problems from the expected gravel operations.
Mr. Brobeck indicated that he was told in 1983 the same information as he
is being given in 1987 regarding decisions that have yet to be made on
sand and gravel operations. The Planning Commission indicated that they
would prefer not to lean towards sand and gravel operations, but the entire
issue is still "in the air." The Petitioner indicated he will market the
property according to the existing zoning but wondered if developing their
property would set a rp gded ence and, therefore, make gravel operations
illegal - -an interesting idea.* Chair .Erickson expressed concern that if the
City were to approve a single family housing development, they would end up
in a court battle and lose.
7. Comprehensive Plan Committee.
COMP PL
MOTION: of Carlson, seconded by Peterson, to establish a Compre- COMMITT
hensive Plan Committee of 12.
DISCUSSION: Ms. McMonigal wondered if this would incl.
the 4 -5 representatives from the Planning Commission.
AMENDMENT TO THE MOTION: establish a maximum of thirteen members
of the Comprehensive Plan Committee„ not exclusive, and
VOTE: on the motion as amended- -YES, 5; No, p. / everyone who applies
may attend the
8a. Sketch Plan, Office warehouse. meetings.
OFFICE
Copies of a proposed sketch plan for a office warehouse in the WAREHOU
NorthStar Industrial Park were distributed. This will be formally
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
September 16, 1987
Page #
presented at the October ?, 1987 meeting. The petitioner will be requesting
tax - increment financing for the proposed 30,000 sq. ft. building.
8b. Copies of the Bylaw; as changed,were distributed.
9. adjourn.
MOTION: of Carlson' seconded by Gowling, to adjoun the meeting at 9 :50 p.m.
VOTE: Yes, 5; No, 0.
APPROVED SECRETARY