Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
03/03/2021 Agenda Packet
M eeting L ocation: M unicipal C enter 7100 147th S treet West Apple Valley, M innesota 55124 March 3, 2021 PLA N N IN G C O MMIS SIO N T EN TAT IVE A G EN D A A N N UA L BUSIN ESS MEET IN G 7:00 P M 1.C all to Order A.Planning C ommissioners will be attending either in-person or virtually. A roll-call will be taken. 2.Approve Agenda 3.Approve C onsent Agenda Items C onsent Agenda Items are considered routine and will be enacted with a single motion, without discussion, unless a commissioner or citizen requests to have any item separately considered. It will then be moved to the land use/action items f or consideration. A.A pprove Minutes of February 3, 2021, Regular Meeting 4.Annual Business Meeting A.N ominate and Approve Officers B.A pprove 2020 Planning C ommission Annual Report 5.Public Hearings A.C ider Ridge Marketplace/Hope Alliance 2nd Addition - PC 21-02-ZC BF 1. Amend Planned Development Zoning (PD ) to Allow C offee Drive-thru 2. C onditional Use Permit (C UP) for Coffee D rive-T hru In C onnection with C lass III Restaurant 3. Site Plan Review/Building Permit Authorization for C onstruction of a 7,100 sq. ft. Multi-Tenant Office Building on Lot 2, Hope Alliance 2nd Addition Location: 7477 - 145th Street West (Northeast C orner C edar Ave and 145th Street W.) Petitioner: Hempel Companies and Hope C hurch of C and M Alliance 6.Land Use / Action Items A.Zoning C ode Amendment to Institutional Zoning D istrict - P C 21-01-O C onsider a text amendment to amend the P "Institutional" zoning district to allow ancillary retail sales when in conjunction with a permitted use Petitioner: C ity of Apple Valley 7.Other Business A.Review of Upcoming Schedule and Other Updates N ext Planning Commission Meeting - Wednesday, March 17, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. N ext C ity Council Meeting - T hursday, March 11, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. 8.Adjourn Regular meetings are broadcast, live, on Charter C ommunications C able C hannel 180 and on the C ity's website at www.cityofapplevalley.org I T E M: 1.A . P L A NNI NG C O MMI S S I O N ME E T I NG D AT E :March 3, 2021 S E C T I O N:Call to O rder Description: P lanning Commissioners will be attending either in-person or virtually. A roll-call will be taken. S taff Contact: B reanna Vincent, Department A ssistant D epartment / Division: C ommunity D evelopment Department AC T I O N RE Q UE S T E D: N/A S UM M ARY: During the C O VID-19 Pandemic, the C ouncil C hambers in the Apple Valley Municipal Building has been set-up to allow for the Planning C ommissioners to attend meetings either in-person (observing social distancing in accordance with Emergency Executive Order 20-81) or virtually (via GoToMeeting). A roll-call will be taken. B AC K G RO UND : N/A B UD G E T I M PAC T: N/A I T E M: 3.A . P L A NNI NG C O MMI S S I O N ME E T I NG D AT E :March 3, 2021 S E C T I O N:C onsent Agenda Description: A pprove Minutes of F ebruary 3, 2021, R egular Meeting S taff Contact: B reanna Vincent, Department A ssistant D epartment / Division: C ommunity D evelopment Department AC T I O N RE Q UE S T E D: Approve minutes of regular meeting of February 3, 2021. S UM M ARY: T he minutes of the last regular Planning Commission meeting are attached for your review and approval. B AC K G RO UND : State statute requires the creation and preservation of meeting minutes which document the official actions and proceedings of public governing bodies. B UD G E T I M PAC T: N/A AT TAC HM E NT S: Minutes CITY OF APPLE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES February 3, 2021 1. CALL TO ORDER The City of Apple Valley Planning Commission Meeting was called to order by Chair Melander at 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Chair Tom Melander, Tim Burke*, Keith Deikmann*, Jodi Kurtz, Paul Scanlan, David Schindler, and Philip Mahowald. Member(s) Absent: None City staff members attending: Community Development Director Bruce Nordquist, City Planner Kathy Bodmer, Planner/Meeting Organizer Alex Sharpe, City Engineer Brandon Anderson, City Attorney Sharon Hills, and Department Assistant Breanna Vincent. *Present via remote technology 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Chair Melander asked if there were any changes to the agenda. CD Director Bruce Nordquist noted an email copy was provided between a resident and City Engineer Brandon Anderson to the commissioners regarding The Cove development. MOTION: Commissioner Burke moved, seconded by Commissioner Scanlan, approving the agenda. Roll call vote: Ayes - 7 – Nays - 0. 3. CONSENT ITEMS MOTION: Commissioner Schindler moved, seconded by Commissioner Scanlan, approving the Consent Items of the agenda (minutes of the meeting of December 16, 2020). Roll call vote: Ayes – 7 – Nays – 0. 4. PUBLIC HEARING A. Zoning Code Amendment to Institutional Zoning District - Consider a text amendment to amend the P "Institutional" zoning district to allow ancillary retail sales when in conjunction with a permitted use. Planner Alex Sharpe presented the staff report. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes February 3, 2021 Page 2 of 6 Chair Melander asked if there are any questions from the Commissioners. Commissioner Deikmann asked if in regards to the golf course providing golf club fittings would that be a service that is excluded? Planner Sharpe deferred to City Attorney Sharon Hills who stated that retail services would not be included as ancillary. Planner Sharpe advised we amend the recommendation to include “subject to City Attorney revisions.” Chair Melander asked if there are any questions from the public – None. With no further comments, Chair Melander closed the public hearing. 5. LAND USE/ACTION ITEMS A. Roers Senior Apartments - Village at Founders Circle 2nd Addition - PC20-14-B Planner Kathy Bodmer presented the staff report. Chair Melander asks if there are any questions from the commissioners. Commissioner Schindler asked about the distance between the building and the street in front with concern to through-traffic being too close to residents coming out of their homes. Planner Bodmer said the distance is 5 feet and acknowledged that the layout is not ideal but is an innovative way to have the strange-shaped property developed. Commissioner Schindler recognized that there would not be much through- traffic other than from residents in that development. Representative from the development clarified that the apartment entrance would be located on the other side of the sidewalk and only the garages would be located facing the through-street. MOTION: Commissioner Burke moved, seconded by Commissioner Kurtz, approving the site plan review/building permit authorization of proposed development for 160 apartment and 12 townhome units with the following conditions (12 conditions listed in staff report) as well as the amendment to condition #9. Roll call vote: Ayes - 7 – Nays - 0. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes February 3, 2021 Page 3 of 6 B. The Cove - PC20-20-ZSB Planner Kathy Bodmer presented the staff report. Community Development Director Nordquist provided an existing picture tour of the lake, from the lake, emphasizing that the horizon shows trees, single homes, and not a compact placement of homes in close proximity. Chair Melander asked if there are any questions from the commissioners. Commissioner Burke asked what benefits the city would get from having 17 detached townhome lots as opposed to the previously proposed 7 detached single- family lots. Planner Bodmer stated the benefit from this negotiation would be the ability to cluster the homes together and allow larger open space and a greater natural buffer zone. A second benefit would be that the developer would need to comply with up-to-date requirements of the Shoreland Overlay zoning district. The developers have had close contact with the DNR for review. Commissioner Scanlan raised concerns about the long-term maintenance of the shore impact zone and what this area could look like in the future with different residents moving in and out. Planner Bodmer stated that some of the features of the site would be easements such as the infiltration areas and basins. This development requires the homeowner’s association to address long-term maintenance. The City is working with the City Attorney’s office who advises it is better to work with the homeowner’s association. City Attorney Sharon Hills stated that the shoreline impact zone is under the DNR rules currently and is not in the city’s shoreline regulations. These provisions could be added to the ordinance. Commissioner Scanlan raised additional concerns regarding snow removal and the private drive as well as apprehension over parking on one side of the street. The hammerhead on one end would provide difficulty for emergency vehicles and likely the plan would need to lose a unit or two to allow for additional off-street parking. Planner Bodmer advised that the Fire Marshall is now asking the ends be dedicated as a fire lane giving more authority for police to ticket and tow. The CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes February 3, 2021 Page 4 of 6 hammerhead is also allowed in the fire code as long as the dimensions are adequate. Commissioner Schindler stated the use of the site did not feel appropriate. There would be a lot of disruption in clearing this site and there are no properties similar to what is being proposed around Lake Farquar. Commissioner Schindler stated there would be an advantage to having one access to the lake, but does not believe the dramatic change to the area around the lake would be the best use. Planner Bodmer said whether the site would be approved for townhomes or single-family homes, this much grading would need to be done with just as much site disruption. Commissioner Schindler asked what street would be needed if the site had 7 single-family lots. Planner Bodmer replied that the single-family lots would not be able to have driveway access to Diamond Path and construction of a street would be needed to service those homes. A case for rezoning would still be needed. Commissioner Kurtz shared that she had recently been around the lake and that the site seemed too small for accommodating 17 townhome units but could see 7 single-family lots working and would like to see the natural beauty remain. Chair Melander expressed concern over accommodating residents who wish to live on larger lots. He mentions the 80% grading, over 200 trees needing to be taken out, and the fragility of the lake being a large concern over this proposal. Chair Melander stated he had no inclination to rezone the area. The Petitioner (Mark Sonstegard of JMH Land) shared a brief presentation regarding erosion control for the site which includes the grading plan, inspections by the state, city and Westwood, as well as stabilization. Chair Melander asked if there were any further questions/comments. Commissioner Burke asked whether this particular plan would be implemented in another part of a R1 zone, would we be considering this amount of lots? Chair Melander asked if this development should be revisited at the next meeting on February 17th. Planner Bodmer replied yes. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes February 3, 2021 Page 5 of 6 C. Apple Valley Square 6th Addition Planner Alex Sharpe presented the staff report. Chair Melander asked if there are any questions from the commissioners. Commissioner Kurtz encouraged the use of awnings on the west elevation. Chair Melander suggested the use of a relief panel with some artistic value to and would also screen the transformers on the west elevation. Planner Sharpe said that staff is open to all suggestions and that the applicant is aware they are short on being able to use the landscape budget due to the space constraints of the site. Commissioner Scanlan wanted to stay consistent with the things the Planning Commission is asking for in regards to similar properties within the city. He stated the 145-stall parking variance is not an issue. Chair Melander agreed. MOTION: Commissioner Burke moved, seconded by Commissioner Scanlan, approving the preliminary plat to subdivide a parcel into two separate lots. Roll call vote: Ayes - 7 – Nays - 0. MOTION: Commissioner Burke moved, seconded by Commissioner Kurtz, approving the required number of parking stalls variance subject to approval from the City Attorney. Roll call vote: Ayes - 7 – Nays - 0. MOTION: Commissioner Burke moved, seconded by Commissioner Kurtz, approving the site plan and building permit authorization. Roll call vote: Ayes - 7 – Nays - 0. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes February 3, 2021 Page 6 of 6 6. OTHER BUSINESS A. Review of Upcoming Schedule and Other Updates The next Planning Commission meeting is Wednesday, February 17, 2021, 7:00 p.m. The next City Council meeting is Thursday, February 11, 2020, 7:00 p.m. CD Director Bruce Nordquist mentioned a lot of great feedback was received on The Cove development and that much could be said about the fact that none of the neighbors present raised any concerns about the information presented. Chair Melander advised that the neighbors have weighed in convincingly already. 7. ADJOURNMENT Hearing no further comments from the Planning Staff or Planning Commission, Chair Melander asked for a motion to adjourn. MOTION: Commissioner Schindler moved, seconded by Commissioner Scanlan, to adjourn the meeting at 9:00 p.m. Roll call vote: Ayes – 7 – Nays – 0. Respectfully submitted, ______________________________________ Breanna Vincent, Planning Department Assistant Approved by the Apple Valley Planning Commission on 3/3/2021 . Thomas O. Melander, Chair I T E M: 4.A . P L A NNI NG C O MMI S S I O N ME E T I NG D AT E :March 3, 2021 S E C T I O N:Annual B usiness Description: Nominate and A pprove Of f icers S taff Contact: B reanna Vincent, Department A ssistant D epartment / Division: C ommunity D evelopment Department AC T I O N RE Q UE S T E D: Nominate and elect the following officer positions: 1. Chair 2. Vice-C hair 3. Secretary S UM M ARY: In accordance with C ity C ode, the Planning Commission provides for an annual business meeting, to be held following the C ity C ouncil meeting at which new appointments to the Commission are made. At the C ity C ouncil meeting of February 25, 2021, existing members Melander and Mahowald were reappointed for a 3-year term. T he purpose of the annual business meeting is to elect officers for the year and approve the annual report from the previous year. B AC K G RO UND : N/A B UD G E T I M PAC T: N/A I T E M: 4.B . P L A NNI NG C O MMI S S I O N ME E T I NG D AT E :March 3, 2021 S E C T I O N:Annual B usiness Description: A pprove 2020 P lanning Commission A nnual R eport S taff Contact: B reanna Vincent, Department A ssistant D epartment / Division: C ommunity D evelopment Department AC T I O N RE Q UE S T E D: Approve 2020 Planning Commission A nnual Report S UM M ARY: T he C ommunity D evelopment Department is responsible for the work of the Planning Commission. C ity ordinance requires that a report of C ommission be provided annually representing the work during the preceding year, 2020. B AC K G RO UND : N/A B UD G E T I M PAC T: N/A AT TAC HM E NT S: R eport APPLE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION 2020 ANNUAL REPORT 2 Planning Commission The role of the Planning Commission is to make recommendations to the City Council on a variety of land use requests and issues. In 2020, there were 14 regularly scheduled Planning Commission and one special meeting held that consisted of public hearings, land use applications and sketch plans. Members of the Apple Valley Planning Commission included: • Tom Melander, Chair • Tim Burke, Vice-Chair • David Schindler, Secretary • Ken Alwin (resigned October 2020) • Keith Diekmann • Jodi Kurtz • Paul Scanlan • Philip Mahowald (appointed December 2020) Community Development - 2020 Overview 2020 was very challenging for the Planning Commission. It began with public hearings for Orchard Place, a 40 acre commercial development at the northwest corner of 157th Street West and Pilot Knob Road and a request for an 117,000-sq. ft. industrial building at the southwest corner of 147th Street West and Johnny Cake Ridge Road. And then, the COVID 19 pandemic burst upon the scene, which caused the Community Development Department to alter the way it conducted business and devote significant time and effort to COVID related activities. These activities included: • Creating a policy and process for expanding temporary outdoor dining opportunities for restaurants in the city. • Creating a financial business assistance program through the Federal Government’s Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act to offset COVID-19 impacts for businesses within the community by providing $10,000 grants to assist businesses that have been negatively impacted by the pandemic. • Conducted committee and commission meetings virtually, which ensured that the City’s business would continue during the pandemic. This included having staff on-site staff to ensure the public meeting hybrid meeting process continued to allow the public to participate virtually while reducing risk to the public, elected officials, and staff. • Assisted with the creation of signs for notice of closure of public facilities, including design and placement at all pertinent locations. • Obtained documentation of businesses pandemic responses for City Council. • Made businesses aware of Governor’s orders to ensure ongoing compliance. 3 • Was primary outreach person for businesses that may have violated Governor’s orders, which resulted in reducing any potential confrontation between businesses and the City; and achieved 100% compliance rate without police intervention in 2020. • Participated in weekly business outreach calls with DEED to ensure the City was informed on business concerns and state responses. After many months of discussion, the City was able to overcome its differences with the Metropolitan Council concerning the Land Use and Housing chapters of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. This resulted with the approval by both the Metropolitan Council and City Council of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan in late July. Final approval of the Plan allowed the Apple Valley Golf Course and Applewood Pointe senior co-op comprehensive plan amendments to move forward and eventually get City Council approval. Key 3 - Business Oriented Key 7 – Sustainability Land Use Development In the last few years, development activity has evolved from review of traditional suburban projects on greenfield parcels to proposals on infill parcels that are generally surrounded by established neighborhoods and businesses. Because of that trend, many 2020 projects were more complex and controversial, which led to more review and meetings. Some projects began in 2019 and some will extend into 2021. In 2020, there were 25 land use development applications. Land use development applications may consist of multiple actions that must be reviewed and analyzed by staff, then presented to the Planning Commission and City Council for their consideration and action. Staff prepared agendas, agenda packets, and minutes for 14 regularly scheduled Planning Commission and one special meeting; and 14 public hearings were held in 2020. The following is a breakout of requests considered by the Planning Commission in 2020: Comprehensive Plan Amendments 0 Zoning Ordinance Amendments/Rezonings 7 Conditional Use Permits 4 Subdivision/Preliminary Plats/Final Plats 5 Site Plan Reviews/Building Permit Authorizations 7 Vacations 0 Variances 7 Environmental Reviews 0 Interim Use Permits 1 Miscellaneous 5 Sketch Plans 3 Total 39 The complexity of land use requests, particularly this year, included comprehensive plan revisions held over from 2019, re-zonings, zoning amendments, variances and site plan/building permit authorizations on property located in established neighborhoods. Changes in these fully 4 developed areas of the City often required multiple meetings for the complete review following considerable time. Key 1 – Service Commercial Projects Panera Bread Restaurant – In 2019, approval was granted to Panera, LLC and Brixmor Southport Centre, LLC, for a planned development ordinance amendment and site plan/building permit authorization to allow the removal of the existing Baker’s Square restaurant and construction of a new Panera Bread restaurant with drive-through window service at 15200 Cedar Avenue. Construction of the new restaurant was expected to begin during the spring of 2020. In late 2020, staff received revised plans that included a second drive lane for rapid pickup service. If this revision moves forward, a new land use application will be necessary, which will require consideration by the Planning Commission and City Council in 2021. Cider Ridge Marketplace – Approvals were granted for a rezoning to a planned development, subdivision by preliminary plat, conditional use permit and site plan review/building permit authorization for a 7,130-sq. ft. multi-tenant building on property in the northeast corner of Cedar Ave and 145th Street West. A 35,910-sq. ft. parcel was carved out of the 7.2-acre Hope Church property to construct the commercial building along Cedar Avenue. The planned development zoning district will be a mix of the "LB" (Limited Business) and "NCC" (Neighborhood Convenience Center) zoning districts, which will allow for a variety of commercial retail uses. Staff continues to work with the developer on securing final approvals that will allow for construction of the multi- tenant building. Regency Centers Apple Valley Square 6th Addition – Review began in 2020 on a request for approval preliminary plat, variance and site plan/building permit authorization for property located at 15125 Cedar Avenue. More specifically, the property owner would like subdivide an existing parcel into two separate lots, be granted a variance to the minimum required parking spaces, and get site plan/building permit authorization to allow for construction of a 3,056-sq. ft. bank with drive-through window service. The public hearing was held in late 2020, and the final review for this project will likely occur in early 2021. Pennock Center C.U.P. – Staff has been working on development proposals for the property located at 7668 150th Street West since 2016. In 2019, the City approved a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a drive-through and setback variances to allow a 6,100 sq. ft. commercial building to redevelop the Liberty Credit site. The existing building was demolished but no permits were obtained for the new building. In 2020, the City approved an extension of the CUP and Building Permit Authorization to allow for new property ownership to make minor revisions to the approved plans. Orchard Place Retail Development – Over the past two years staff has been working with a developer and property owner on a 40-acre commercial development proposal in a portion of a reclaimed gravel mining area at the northwest corner of 157th Street West and Pilot Knob Road. Development of the site could likely include over 270,000 sq. ft. of retail space and will require rezoning, subdivision, and site plan/building permit authorization approval. An application was received at the end of December 2019, which requested the rezoning and subdivision that would create four lots and four outlots for the purpose developing 31,700 sq. ft. of retail space on approximately seven acres. Approval of the rezoning and preliminary plat was 5 granted in July. Applications for final plat, as well as a conditional use permit and site plan/building permit authorization for a car wash operation; and conditional use permit for a drive-through window service for a coffee shop, and site plan/building permit for two multi-tenant retail buildings were submitted in late 2020. Final consideration of these requests will likely occur sometime during 2021. Kwik Trip Building Addition – Kwik Trip, Inc., submitted a building permit to construct a 1,181 sq. ft. building addition onto its store at 13357 Palomino Drive. The building addition would increase the store to 4,764 sq. ft., which would be 1,264 sq. ft. larger than what was allowed in zone 5 of Planned Development No. 144, which limited the size of convenience stores to 3,500 sq. ft. Staff worked cooperatively with Kwik Trip with getting a planned development ordinance amendment that would allow for the expansion. Summers Ridge of Apple Valley – Approvals were granted for a 64-unit high acuity senior facility located at the northeast corner of 157th Street West and Pilot Knob Road. Construction is expected to begin spring of 2021. Key 3 - Business Oriented Industrial Projects Reliable Mini-Storage – In 2019, a final plat and site plan/building permit authorization was approved for a six building, 52,000 sq. ft. self-storage facility of 280 units located at Evendale Way and 147th Street West. Staff worked with the applicant to remove all units facing the residential homes to the east and provide a 60-foot wide buffer of landscaping and greenspace. Staff began monitoring construction in 2020, which will continue through the completion of construction of all the buildings in 2021. Apple Valley Commerce Center – Review began in December 2019 and preliminary approvals were granted in 2020 for a request for the rezoning, subdivision by preliminary plat and site plan review/building permit authorization to allow construction of a 117,000-sq. ft. office/warehouse/flex industrial building on the southwest corner of 147th Street West and Johnny Cake Ridge Road. The development included a land swap with Menards and the receipt of grant funds from DEED (Department of Employment and Economic Development) to assist with the cleanup buried debris from the previous business. Staff will be working with the developer on receiving final plat approval in 2021. Key 3 - Business Oriented Residential Projects Apple Valley Golf Course Redevelopment – Many meetings were held including several public hearings to consider comprehensive plan land use map amendments and rezoning of a 23-acre golf course from “PR” (Private Recreation) to a new residential designation. After numerous meetings, the City Council approved the Comp Plan amendments that created the “LDF” (Low Density Flex) residential designation and approval of the rezoning of the property from “P” (Institutional) to “LDF” (Low Density Flex). Approvals also included the creation a “LDF” zoning ordinance that would be applicable for the golf course property as well as other eligible properties in the city. This opens the door for future residential development on the property. 6 Tempo Homes – Approval was granted for a subdivision of a .77-acre parcel located at 12936 Galaxie Ave (Lot 3, Block 1 Broner Woods) into two parcels. The existing parcel is zoned "R 3" (Single-Family Residential) and has a current residence. The developer plans on remodeling the existing home and constructing a new home on the second lot. The final plat and development agreement are expected to be completed in 2021. Applewood Pointe Senior Cooperative and Townhomes - Review began in 2019 on a proposed redevelopment of 10.93 acres of property located at 12444 Pilot Knob Road. United Properties requested a rezoning, creation of a planned development ordinance, subdivision and site plan/building permit authorization that would convert the single-family residential property to multi-family residential that would include a 98-unit senior co-op building and up to seven townhomes. Construction will commence on the co-op building upon completion of the final plat, which will likely occur in early 2021. The Cove – During the past 20 years, staff has been working with past and present owners of 8.12 acres of property along the east side of Farquar Lake on potential housing for the multiple parcels. This has include sketch plan reviews by the Planning Commission and many meetings with city staff. Late last year the property owner and a developer submitted an application requesting a rezoning, subdivision by preliminary plat, conditional use permit and site plan review/building permit authorization to allow for a 17-unit detached villa townhome project. This project will continue to be reviewed in 2021. Roers Senior Apartments at Village at Founders Circle - Roers Companies was selected by the CDA to develop property in the Central Village area to provide a Class A "active senior (55+)" apartment development with 80% market rate units and 20% affordable units. The developer has requested site plan review/building permit authorization that would allow for the construction of a 4-story, 160-unit apartment building with underground parking and 16 townhome units for a total of 176 units on the site. Review and consideration of this request will continue into 2021. Key 2 - A Great Place to Live, Key 12- A Community for a Lifetime Variances The variance process is statutory, allowing the Planning Commission to make recommendations on practical difficulties that sometimes occur in the exact enforcement of city code. The City reviewed the following variances in 2020. Alvarado Driveway Width – The Planning Commission reviewed a request for a variance to exceed the maximum residential driveway width from 36 feet to 40 feet, a four-foot variance for a residential property in west Apple Valley. This variance request was in response to a driveway that recently expanded by the property owner. The Planning Commission recommended denial and the owner withdrew his request. Staff subsequently worked with the resident to hire a contractor to professionally remove the additional four feet of driveway. Leach Accessory Garage – In 2020, Dr. Thomas Leach, 8460 133rd Street Court, received an extension of approval for a variance that allowed him to increase the size of a detached garage from 750 sq. ft. to 957 sq. ft. Dr. Leach originally obtained the variance for a larger building in 2013, but did not move forward with his project. In 2015 and 2017 he received extensions of 7 approval of the variance, but reduced the size of the garage from 1,248 sq. ft. to 957 sq. ft. The variance granted in 2020 is valid for two years. AmericInn Sign – In 2018, approval was granted that allowed the reduction of a sign setback from 13 feet to seven feet, a six-foot variance, for a ground sign and a variance allowing off- premise signage. In 2020, AmericInn applied for a second sign variance for the pylon sign on site. Upon review, staff found that they could not recommend approval of a variance to the Planning Commission. Working with staff, the applicant withdrew their application prior to Planning Commission review. Heritage Lutheran Church Sign – Approval was granted for a three-foot variance from required setback for a sign at Heritage Lutheran Church, located at 13401 Johnny Cake Ridge Road. This allowed the church to update their existing ground sign to include an electronic message. Key 1 - Service, Key 2 - Livable Institutional Projects Longridge Tower Interim Use Permit - An interim use permit was approved to allow for the temporary relocation of existing communication antennas on the Longridge water reservoir located at 8351 160th Street West. This permit was granted to allow for the temporary placement of a 76-foot tall monopole in the southwest corner of the Longridge water reservoir site. The purpose was to allow for the relocation of existing communication antennas affixed to the reservoir onto the monopole as part of a reservoir-reconditioning project. The antennas will be reattached to the reservoir and the monopole removed after completion of its rehabilitation. Education Building – Large projects budgeted for 2020 were postponed to 2020 due to St. Mary’s departing and terminated their lease in spring. In fall 2020 the Education Building was utilized as a voting precinct due to other locations being unavailable due to COVID. A new tenant is anticipated to lease a portion of the vacated space in spring 2021. Key 1 - Service, Key 10 - Exceptional Learning Transit/Transportation Staff continued to provide support for City leaders who serve on various transportation related committees and boards. In 2020, staff attended nine Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) meetings, seven MVTA Board meetings, and one MVTA Planner Workgroup meeting, which is a new group made up planners representing the communities and counties that make up the MVTA. County Road 42 Study – Staff is participating with Dakota County and the cities of Burnsville, and Rosemount on a long-term vision for County Road 42. The study is looking at 15 miles of the roadway, from the county's west border in Burnsville to Highway 52 in Rosemount. The study will address traffic growth, land uses and future improvements. The goals include finding cost- effective ways to improve mobility and safety for vehicles and pedestrians and to improve connections across County Highway 42. Review of the study’s findings and the setting of next steps to implement needed projects will occur March–June 2021. Key 2 - A Great Place to Live, Key 8 - Accessible 8 Zoning Code Amendments Low Density Flex Amendments – The zoning code was updated to include a new residential zoning district that would residential development at densities between 2-8 units per acre. The ordinance had conditions that would allow only single-and two family dwellings on property directly adjacent to existing single-and two family dwellings, and density could be increased in areas contingent on requirement that the overall density not exceed eight units per acre. Shoreland Overlay District – Staff has begun work with the City Attorney on updating the Shoreland Overlay Ordinance. This work is being done to ensure consistency with the Minn. Dept. of Natural Resources’ regulations. PD-739 Building Setbacks – Amendments were made to the planned development ordinance to reflect conditions related to the 58-unit senior cooperative on the southwest corner of Galaxie Ave and 153rd Street West in Central Village. Applewood Pointe Planned Development Ordinance – Staff prepared a draft planned development ordinance for the proposed senior co-op development located at the northeast corner of Pilot Knob Road and McAndrews Road. The draft ordinance establishes the uses, area requirements and performance standards. Official consideration of the draft ordinance will occur at the time of approval of the Applewood Pointe of Apple Valley final plat and development agreement. Food Truck Ordinance - Worked extensively with residents on proposed food truck regulations. The draft ordinance will be brought forward for consideration in early in 2021. Key 1 - Service, Key 2 - A Great Place to Live, Key 7 - Sustainable 2040 Comprehensive Plan In 2017, The City began the process of updating the Comprehensive Plan. The Planning Commission was appointed the steering committee for this process. The Commission, along with the Community Development department coordinated the efforts that required working with outside consultants staff from other city departments. The Planning Commission held public hearing on June 6, 2018, and the City Council approved the submission of the draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan to the Metropolitan Council for their review on December 27, 2018. After many months of discussion, a consensus was reached that addressed both the goals of the City and regional goals of the Metropolitan Council specifically with regard future land use and housing. This allowed both the Metropolitan Council and City Council to adopt the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The Planning Commission reviewed the final draft of the 2040 Plan and recommended its approval at the July 15, 2020 meeting, and the Metropolitan Council approved the Plan on July 22, 2020, and the City Council adopted the Plan on July 23, 2020. Key 1 - Service, Key 2 - A Great Place to Live, Key 3 - Business Oriented, Key 4 - Safe, Key 5 - Parks to Experience, Key 6 - Healthy and Active, Key 7 - Sustainable, Key 8 - Accessible, Key 9 - Successful Downtown, Key 10 - Exceptional Learning, Key 11 - Technology and Innovation, Key 12 - Community for a Lifetime I T E M: 5.A . P L A NNI NG C O MMI S S I O N ME E T I NG D AT E :March 3, 2021 S E C T I O N:Public Hearings Description: Cider Ridge Marketplace/Hope Alliance 2nd A ddition - P C21-02-Z C B F S taff Contact: K athy Bodmer, A I C P, P lanner D epartment / Division: C ommunity D evelopment Department Applicant: Hempel Companies and Hope Church of C &M Alliance P roject Number: P C21-02-Z C B F Applicant Date: 2/1/2021 60 Days: 4/2/2021 120 Days: 6/1/2021 AC T I O N RE Q UE S T E D: Open public hearing, receiv e comments, close public hearing. It is the policy of the Planning C ommission to not take action on an item on the same night as its public hearing. S UM M ARY: P rev ious Approv als: T he C ider Ridge development received preliminary approvals August 2020 to subdivide the 7.2-acre Hope Church property at 7477 - 145th Street West to create a 36,000 sq. ft. parcel to construct a 7,100 sq. ft. multiple tenant limited business/neighborhood service building. T he following actions have been approved: Comprehensiv e P lan Amendment from "IN S" (Institutional) to "C " (Commercial) for Lot 2, Hope Alliance 2nd Addition (as preliminary platted). Rezoning from "P" (Institutional) to "PD" (Planned D evelopment) of Lot 2, Hope Alliance 2nd Addition (as preliminary platted). The next step in the process was to bring the PD ordinance with approved uses, setbacks and development standards back to the C ity C ouncil f or adoption. Subdiv ision by P reliminary P lat of Hope Alliance 2nd Addition (Final Plat and Development Agreement still needed). Site P lan Rev iew/B uilding P ermit Authorization for 7,130 sq. ft. multiple tenant limited business and neighborhood service building. Current Request: T he developer requests reconsideration of the list of uses allowed in the P D Ordinance to add coffee drive-thru window service in connection with a C lass III restaurant. When the Planning C ommission and City C ouncil reviewed the draft PD ordinance, they discussed the fact that a coffee drive-thru would likely generate high levels of traffic which would negatively impact the residential properties nearby. T he draft PD ordinance expressly prohibits drive-thru window service in connection with a C lass III restaurant. T he developer submitted a formal request for the City to reconsider the coffee drive-thru window and is presenting a revised plan that would accommodate coffee drive-thru. In addition, a conditional use permit is requested for a coffee drive-thru on the site. B AC K G RO UND : Approv ed Draft P D Ordinance: When the Cider Ridge Marketplace project was under review, the Planning C ommission and C ity C ouncil were very intentional about the uses that would be permitted within the zoning district. T he draft P D district that was reviewed and supported contained a mix of limited business uses including small professional offices and Class I and C lass III restaurants. Neighborhood service uses were also included in the PD zoning including dry cleaners, bakeries, tailors, and hair salons. T he limited business and neighborhood service uses were intended to be businesses that closed in the evenings and over the weekends. P roposed Rev ised P lan: T he petitioner proposes to revise the approved C ider Ridge site plan by placing coffee drive-thru on the south side of the building. T he approved plan placed the bank drive-thru on the north side of the site. T he proposed drive-thru is designed as a compact loop circulating only in the parking area on the south side of the building. T he building remains the same size, at 7,100 sq. ft., but is pushed slightly north and 18.5' from Cedar Avenue. T his setback is consistent with similar redevelopment infill developments along C edar Avenue. For example, T C F was approved to be 10' from C edar Avenue to encourage connection between the building and the street. T he drive-thru loop is shown within the City's drainage and utility easement which is an issue of concern. C ity services are located within the easements and the C ity will need access to those services. While placing the drive-thru on the south side of the building helps to buffer the residential neighborhoods to the north and northeast, there are traffic circulation issues that are of concern. T he traffic flow at the drive-thru causes cross-over between vehicles entering and exiting the drive-thru which becomes more problematic when there are several vehicles waiting in the queue. Engineering staff reviewed the request and provided feedback from the traffic engineer regarding circulation concerns. T he City Engineer states that placing the drive-thru lane behind the building would allow for stacking of vehicles and reduce conflicts within the parking lot. T he petitioner states that placing the drive-thru behind the building will reduce the number of parking spaces available on the property. B UD G E T I M PAC T: N/A AT TAC HM E NT S: Map Ordinance Plan S et Plan S et Memo S IT E CEDAR AVEGLENDA DR145TH S T W GLAZIER AVEGRANADA DRGENESEEAVE GAR R E T T A V E 146TH WAY W 146TH S T W143RDSTW UPPER 146TH ST W 144T H C TGLADI OLA CTU P P E R 1 4 5 T H S T W 146TH S T W 145TH ST W GARRETT AVECEDAR AVE1 4 3 R D S T W CIDE R RI DGEMARKETPLACE µ LOCA T IO N M A P ^ µ CIDER RIDGEMARKETPLACE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP ^ SITE C GLENDA DRCEDAR AVE145TH ST W GLAZIER AVEGRANADA DRCEDAR AVEC C C C MD INS INS µ CIDER RIDGEMARKETPLACE ZONING MAP ^ SITE PD P P LB RBGB LB GB GB RB LB RB LB GB LB LB R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 M-5C M-4CM-6C M-4C M-8C M-6C PD-290GLENDADRCEDAR AVEGLAZIERAVE G E N E SEEAVE GARRETT AVE146TH WAY W 143RD S T W 4 OBLIQUE AERIAL VIEW Approx. Site Location 1 Draft PD Ordinance Recommended for Approval by Planning Commission June 19, 2019 Reviewed by City Council August 27, 2020 for Rezoning Subject to City Council’s Final Adoption of PD Ordinance CITY OF APPLE VALLEY ORDINANCE NO. ____ AN ORDINANCE REZONING CERTAIN LAND AND AMENDING CHAPTER 155, APPENDIX F OF THE CITY CODE BY ADDING ARTICLE 38, ESTABLISHING PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DESIGNATION NO. _____, IN THE CITY OF APPLE VALLEY, DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA The City Council of Apple Valley Ordains: Section 1. The City of Apple Valley official zoning map is amended to add Planned Development Designation No. ____ and the following property to be included therein: Zone 1: Lot 2, Block 1 HOPE ALLIANCE 2ND ADDITION Section 2. Apple Valley City Code, Chapter 155, Appendix F, is amended by adding Article 38 to read as follows: ARTICLE 38. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DESIGNATION NO. _____. § A38-1 PURPOSE. The purpose of this designation is to amend the zoning chapter by establishing specific performance standards in compliance with § § 155.260 through 155.271 for property so designated on the official zoning map. This zoning district is located at the periphery of a residential neighborhood and is intended to provide a limited range of office, professional service and neighborhood service uses. § A38-2 PERMITTED USES. (A) Zone 1: Within this zone, no structure or land shall be used, except for one or more of the following uses or uses deemed similar by the City Council: (1) Professional and general offices. (2) Banks, savings and loan, credit unions and other financial institutions. 2 (3) Clinics for human care limited to a maximum of 4,000 square feet each. (4) Class III restaurant not to exceed 2,500 square feet with no drive-thru. (5) On-sale wine and 3.2% malt liquor in conjunction with a Class III restaurant facility. (6) The following neighborhood service uses as limited to the following uses, unless otherwise specifically approved by the City Council: art and school supplies in connection with an art studio, lab or maker space; bakeries; barbershop and hair salons; custom dressmaking and tailoring; dry cleaning “Drop and Go” (no drive-thru or on-site treatment permitted); florists; interior decorating studio (no on-site retail furniture sales); jewelry and watch repair; locksmith shop; music and musical instrument instruction; photography studio; pottery studio; shoe repair; toys/candy made on site; and electronic device repair and service for computers, cell phones, tablets, gaming consoles, drones and similar devices limited to 2,500 sq. ft. § A38-3 CONDITIONAL USES. (A) Zone 1. No structure or land shall be used for the following uses or uses deemed similar by the City Council, except by conditional use permit: (1) Funeral homes and mortuaries (no on-site crematory). (2) Animal hospital or clinic when contained within a building (no outdoor pet relief area). (3) Drive-thru window service for bank or similar financial institution (limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday, no Sunday hours). No 24-hour drive-up ATMs permitted. (4) License daycare facility. (5) Health or fitness facility, day spa or yoga studio provided all activities are conducted inside the building. No outdoor cross-training or similar outdoor classes or training allowed on the premises. § A38-4 PERMITTED ACCESSORY USES. (A) Zone 1. Within this zone, the following uses or uses deemed similar by the City Council shall be permitted accessory uses: (1) Off-street parking, refuse storage and loading spaces, as regulated by this chapter. 3 (2) Buildings, trailers, unscreened trash dumpsters, or portable storage units temporarily located on the subject lot only for the purposes of construction on the premises for a period of time not to exceed time necessary for such construction. Trash dumpsters shall be removed from the subject lot when full. (3) Public telephone booths and other essential public service facilities provided all yard requirements are met. (4) Outdoor dining area in conjunction with Class III restaurant, subject to the regulations set forth in this chapter. § A38-5. MINIMUM BUSINESS AREA STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS. (A) The following standards and requirements shall be met. No improvements shall be placed on such lands unless the lands to be so used or improved shall meet the following minimum area and dimensional requirements: (1) TABLE OF MINIMUM AREA REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS. Zone 1 Minimum Lot Dimensions Lot Area (square feet) 10,000 Lot Width (feet) 100 Minimum Building Setbacks Along principal or minor arterial streets (feet) 25 Along all other streets (feet) 14 Minimum Parking Setbacks Along principal or minor arterial streets (feet) 10’ Along all other streets (feet) 0’ Maximum Building Coverage Coverage of lot (percentage) 20 Maximum Building Height (feet) 25 (2) Lighting; see 155.353 (3) Off-street loading; see § 155.354 (4) Building Design and Screening; see § § 155.346 and 155.348 (5) Landscaping; see § 155.349 (6) Parking; see § § 155.370 through 155.379 4 § A38-6. SPECIAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (A) In order to ensure a properly integrated design within the planned development, all uses shall comply with the following special performance standards: (1) Hours of operation shall be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. (2) No overnight parking of vehicles. (3) No outside storage of merchandise or other materials. Section 3. Summary approved. The City Council hereby determines that the text of the summary marked "Official Summary of Ordinance No. ____, a copy of which is attached hereto, clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance. The City Council further determines that publication of the title and such summary will clearly inform the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance. Section 4. Filing. The City Clerk shall file a copy of this ordinance in her office, which copy shall be available for inspection by any person during regular office hours. Section 5. Publication. The City Clerk shall publish the title of this ordinance and the official summary in the official newspaper of the City with notice that a printed copy of the ordinance is available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk. Section 6. Effective date. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication of its title and official summary. 5 PASSED by the City Council this _____th day of ______, 2020. Mary Hamann-Roland, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk CITY OF APPLE VALLEY ORDINANCE NO. ____ AN ORDINANCE REZONING CERTAIN LAND AND AMENDING CHAPTER 155 APPENDIX F OF THE CITY CODE BY ADDING ARTICLE 38, ESTABLISHING PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DESIGNATION NO. _____, IN THE CITY OF APPLE VALLEY, DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA The following is the official summary of Ordinance No. ____ approved by the City Council of Apple Valley on _______ ___, 2020 Lot 2, Block 1, HOPE ALLIANCE 2ND ADDITION, is rezoned from “P” (Institutional) to Planned Development Designation No. _______. Chapter 155 of the City Code is amended by adding Article 38 to Appendix F establishing PD- _____ which provides a limited range of office, professional service and neighborhood service uses. A printed copy of the ordinance is available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk at the Apple Valley Municipal Center, 7100 - 147th Street West, Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124. REMOVE TREES145TH STREETCEDAR AVENUE (CO.RD. NO. 23)REMOVE TREESREMOVE TREESALVAGELIGHT POLESALVAGE LIGHT POLEREMOVE TREESREMOVE RETAININGWALLREMOVE TREEREMOVE CURB & GUTTERREMOVE CURB& GUTTERREMOVE CURB & GUTTERREMOVE SIGN &LIGHTINGPROTECT EXISTING TREESPROTECT WATER SERVICEPROTECT EXISTINGTREESPROTECT TREEPROTECT EXISTINGTREESPROTECT GAS LINERELOCATE GAS SIGNAGEREMOVE AND REPLACESTORM SEWER CASTINGSEE SHEET C-301RELOCATE MAILBOXSEE SHEET C-101PROTECT SANITARY MANHOLEPROTECT UNDERGROUND TELEPHONEPROTECT SIDEWALKPROTECT EXISTING TREEREMOVE TRASH ENCLOSUREPROTECT CATCHBASINPROTECT CURB & GUTTERPROTECT WATERSERVICEPROTECT BITUMINOUSTRAILPROTECT ELECTRICTRANSFORMERSREMOVE TREESREMOVE CURB& GUTTERREMOVE AND REPLACE SIDEWALKTO MAKE UTILITY CONNECTIONSAW CUT BITUMINOUSREMOVE STRIPINGREMOVE CURB & GUTTERPROTECT EXISTINGTREESPROTECT EXISTING TREESPROTECT WALLPROTECT SIDEWALKREMOVE CURB & GUTTERREMOVE CURB& GUTTERCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS3C-501BITUMINOUSINTERLOCK ATMATCHLINERELOCATE TREESEE L1.01 FOR NEW LOCATIONPROTECTEXISTING TREESRELOCATEHYDRANTREMOVE CURB& GUTTERREMOVE CONCRETESIDEWALKREMOVE VEGETATIONPROTECT EXISTING TREEREMOVE CONCRETESIDEWALKREMOVE CONCRETESIDEWALKRELOCATE TREESSEE L1.01 FOR NEW LOCATION1DEMOLITION PLAN1" = 20'6020SCALE IN FEET Know what's below. Call before you dig. RDEMOLITIONPLANC-010LEGENDDEMOLITION NOTESREMOVE BITUMINOUSREMOVE CONCRETE1.BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY TAKEN FROM SURVEY PERFORMED BY CORNERSTONELAND SURVEYING INC., ON JANUARY 29, 2019 EXPRESSLY FOR THIS PROJECT. ELAN DESIGN LAB CANNOTGUARANTY THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF THIS INFORMATION. VERIFY ALL FIELD CONDITIONS AND UTILITYLOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR UNKNOWN UTILITIES ARE FOUNDTHAT IMPACT DESIGN OR IMPAIR CONSTRUCTION, THE ENGINEER AND OWNER SHOULD BE IMMEDIATELY NOTIFIED.2.CONTRACTOR SHALL BRING ANY CHANGED OR UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS THAT COULD RESULT IN ADDITIONALCOST TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER AND ENGINEER AS SOON AS THEY ARE DISCOVERED SO THAT THEY CANBE PROPERLY DOCUMENTED. FAILURE TO NOTIFY OR COVERING UN-WITNESSED WORK SHALL RESULT INREJECTION OF CLAIMS FOR ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION.3.PROTECT ALL STRUCTURES AND LANDSCAPE NOT LABELED FOR DEMOLITION FROM DAMAGE DURINGCONSTRUCTION. ANY ON-SITE OR OFF-SITE AREAS DISTURBED DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY DUE TO CONSTRUCTIONSHALL BE RETURNED TO A CONDITION EQUAL TO OR BETTER THAN THE EXISTING CONDITION. CONTRACTOR ISSOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY CIVIL PENALTIES RESULTING FROM THEIR WORK UNDER THIS CONTRACT.4.NO DEMOLITION MATERIALS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF ON-SITE. ALL DEBRIS SHALL BE HAULED OFF-SITE TO ADISPOSAL AREA APPROVED BY APPROPRIATE GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES FOR THE HANDLING OF DEMOLITIONDEBRIS. WORK SITE SHALL BE LEFT IN A CONDITION THAT MINIMIZES EROSION POTENTIAL ON A NIGHTLY BASE.5.LIMIT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES TO THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHOWN ON THE PLAN. IF WORK NEEDS TO EXTENDTO PUBLIC STREETS OR RIGHT OF WAY IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO APPLY FOR ALL PERMITS,PREPARE ALL DRAWING AND PAY ALL FEES AND COST. ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL COMPLY WITH LOCALORDINANCES.6.CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SHALL BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF DEMOLITION OPERATIONS. SEESHEET C-202 AND C-201 FOR ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND APPROPRIATE STAGING AND SEQUENCING.7.PROVIDE NECESSARY BARRICADES, SUFFICIENT LIGHTS, SIGNS AND OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL METHODS AS MAYBE NECESSARY FOR THE PROTECTION AND SAFETY OF THE PUBLIC AND MAINTAIN THROUGHOUT THE LIFE OF THEPROJECT.8.REMOVE ALL EXISTING SURFACE SITE FEATURES INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, FENCING, RETAINING WALLS,SCREEN WALLS, CONCRETE APRONS, SITE LIGHTING AND RELATED FOUNDATIONS, SITE SPECIFIC SIGNAGE ANDRELATED FOUNDATIONS, BOLLARDS, AND LANDSCAPING WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS UNLESS NOTEDOTHERWISE.9.COORDINATE WITH ALL PRIVATE UTILITY OWNERS FOR THE RE-USE OF EXISTING ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, CATV, ETC.SERVICES TO THE SITE.10.RELOCATION OF UTILITIES SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE LOCAL UTILITY COMPANIES. ELECTRIC HANDHOLES,PULLBOXES, POWERPOLES, GUYLINES, AND STRUCTURES DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES TO BERESTORED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFIC OWNER REQUIREMENTS AT CONTRACTORS EXPENSE.REMOVE TREESREMOVE CURB & GUTTERHEM19001PROJECT NO.I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me,or under my direct supervision, and that I am aduly Licensed Professional Engineer under thelaws of the state of MINNESOTA.Stephen M. Johnston1891401/26/2021CITY COMMENTS05/02/19SITE PLANREVIEW04/22/2019NOT FORCONSTRUCTION CIDER RIDGEMARKETPLACEAPPLE VALLEYMINNESOTASHEETCERTIFICATIONREGISTRATION NO.DATEISSUEDATESHEET INDEXPROJECTIDS CENTER80 SOUTH 8TH STREET, SUITE 1850MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402(612) 335-2600D E S I G NCivil Engineering | Landscape Architecture | Construction Services901 N 3rd STREET, SUITE 120MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401www.elanlab.comp 612.260.7980f 612.260.7990PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS05/13/19SITE PLAN RESUBMITTAL05/28/19SITE PLAN RESUBMITTAL06/10/19SITE PLAN RESUBMITTAL01/20/2101/26/21PLANNING RESUBMITTALCONSTRUCTION LIMITSVEGETATION CLEARING NO PARKINGNO PARKING NO PARKINGNO PARKINGCOFFEE2,060 +/- SF.RETAIL5,040 +/- SF.145TH STREETCEDAR AVENUE (CO.RD. NO. 23)7C-501BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTSECTION (TYP)CONCRETE PAVEMENTSECTION (TYP)9'11.16'EXISTING CONCRETESIDEWALKPATCH SIDEWALKTYP TYP10'1C-502ACCESSIBLE PARKINGSIGN (TYP)9C-5012C-501B612 CURB & GUTTER(TYP)TYP 8'8'ACCESSIBLE PARKINGSIGN (TYP)2C-5024C-502CONCRETE SIDEWALKPAVEMENTSECTION (TYP)8C-501ACCESSIBLECURB RAMP (TYP)SIDEWALK JOINT (TYP)11C-501CURBOPENING10C-501INTEGRAL CURBAND WALK (TYP)76310448PROPOSEDLOT LINEPROPOSED UTILITYEASEMENT5.67'6'10'CONSTRUCTIONLIMITSF-FF-F 20.67'20'16.15'BOLLARDTRASHENCLOSURE6' HIGH PRIVACY FENCEINSTALLED ON PROPERTY LINE4'R5'BIKERACKDRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENTDRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT9'UNDERGROUNDINFILTRATION SYSTEMSEE C-3018L-5016C-5024C-501CURB TRANSITIONFROM SURMOUNTABLETO B612 CURB'STOP' SIGNREINSTALLSALVAGEDMAILBOXPROOF OF PARKING143PROPOSEDLOT LINEHEAVY DUTYCONCRETE PAVEMENTEXISTING CONCRETEWALKEXISTING CONCRETEWALK201518.5'9'8'8'8'8'9'TYPTYP 9'TYPF-F5' CONCRETESIDEWALKEXISTING 4' CONCRETESIDEWALK3' CONCRETEWALK5.67'LINE OF EXISTINGCURBLINE OF EXISTINGDRIVEWAYR3.67'R10'R3.67'24'20'R 1 0 'R3.67'R25'9'TYP5' CURB TRANSITIONFROM 6" TO 4" CURB15.65'R3.67'4'R . 6 7 ' R. 6 7 '24'R15'R15'R3.67'R10'R3.66'R5'R3.67'18.5'24'18.5'5.6'24'18.5'R10'R3.67'R20'R10'R3.67'R3.67'R10'16'F-F7.1''DO NOT ENTER'SIGN9'TYP20'24.2'18.5'R3.67'R10'R3.67'9'24'18.5'68.19'1'18.5'24'8.8'24'20'12'F-F 24'20'20'3R 3 . 6 7 'R10'R 3 . 6 7 'R10'R3.67'R10'R6'R8'R16'R28'9'9'18.5'TYP TYP24'18.5' 27.2'34.8'R25'18'5.31'11.5'R5'18.2'106'F-FR10'R5.5'R30'13.2'F-F 18.1'17.5'4MONUMENTSIGNR1.6'DRIVE-THRUWINDOWMENU BOARDSPEAKERPOSTVEHICLE HEIGHTDETECTORMENU BOARD6'6'4.6'INTEGRAL CURBAND WALK (TYP)67'7'1SITE PLAN1" = 20'6020SCALE IN FEET Know what's below. Call before you dig. RSITE PLANC-101SITE PLAN NOTESHEM19001PROJECT NO.I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me,or under my direct supervision, and that I am aduly Licensed Professional Engineer under thelaws of the state of MINNESOTA.Stephen M. Johnston1891401/26/2021CITY COMMENTS05/02/19SITE PLANREVIEW04/22/2019NOT FORCONSTRUCTION CIDER RIDGEMARKETPLACEAPPLE VALLEYMINNESOTASHEETCERTIFICATIONREGISTRATION NO.DATEISSUEDATESHEET INDEXPROJECTIDS CENTER80 SOUTH 8TH STREET, SUITE 1850MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402(612) 335-2600D E S I G NCivil Engineering | Landscape Architecture | Construction Services901 N 3rd STREET, SUITE 120MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401www.elanlab.comp 612.260.7980f 612.260.7990PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS05/13/19SITE PLAN RESUBMITTAL05/28/19SITE PLAN RESUBMITTAL06/10/19SITE PLAN RESUBMITTAL01/20/2101/26/21PLANNING RESUBMITTAL1.DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE TO FACE OF CURB AND EXTERIOR FACE OF BUILDINGUNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.2.MEET AND MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS. PROVIDE PROPER TRANSITION AS NECESSARY.3.ON-SITE CURB TO BE B612 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER UNLESS NOTED.4.ALL CURBS TO HAVE 3/4" EXPANSION JOINTS AT A MAXIMUM OF 100'-0" AND CONTROL JOINTS AT AMAXIMUM OF 10'-0".5.ALL PARKING STALLS TO BE PAINTED WITH A 4" WIDE WHITE STRIPING. ACCESSIBLE SYMBOLS TO BEPAINTED IN WHITE AND ACCESSIBILITY ACCESS AISLES TO BE PAINTED WITH A 4" WIDE WHITEPAINTED STRIPE 18 INCHES ON CENTER AND AT 45 DEGREE ANGLE TO STALL, WITH 'NO PARKING'MARKED NEAR THE DRIVE AISLE. REFLECTORIZED PAINT SHALL COMPLY WITH MNDOT 3592.LEGENDCONCRETE SIDEWALK/PAVEMENTNEW BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTPROJECT SUMMARYAREA SUMMARYTOTAL PARCEL AREA (EXCLUDING 45TH STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY)313,646 SF. (7.20 AC.)LOT 2 AREA (BANK/ BUSINESS)35,910 SF. (0.82 AC.)LAND USEEXISTING AREAPROPOSED AREAEXISTING BUILDING15,193 SF (5%)15,193 SF (5%)PROPOSED BUILDING 7,100 SF (2%)PAVEMENT (WALK/ DRIVE/ PARKING)49,034 SF (15%)55,879 SF (18%)TOTAL IMPERVIOUS64,227 SF (20%)78,172 SF (25%)PERVIOUS249,419 SF (80%)235,474 SF (75%)BUILDING COVERAGELOT 15.5%LOT 217.2%PARKING SUMMARYREQUIREDPROPOSEDLOT 2 PARKING40 STALLS37 STALLSSHARED PARKING FOR 2 LOTS105 STALLS95 STALLS2 - 8'X18.5' ACCESSIBLE STALLS4 - 8'X20' ACCESSIBLE STALLS55 - 9'X18.5' STALLS34 - 9'X20' STANDARD STALLS3 - 9'X18.5' STALLS (PROOF OF PARKING)3 - 9'X20' STANDARD STALLS (PROOF OF PARKING)PROPOSED BICYCLE3 BIKE RACKS - 6 SPACESPERVIOUS AREAMILL AND OVERLAY EXISTING PAVEMENTHEAVY DUTY PAVEMENT 145TH STREETCEDAR AVENUE (CO.RD. NO. 23)>>FFE 958.5145TH STREETCEDAR AVENUE (CO.RD. NO. 23)NO PARKING>>TOP 57.4BTM 56.4TOP 57.9BTM 56.0TOP 58.0BTM 56.3TOP 57.9BTM 56.7>>>>>>>>NO PARKING NO PARKINGNO PARKINGFFE 958.5>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>2.5%1.5%1.9%3.5%>>1.5%2.0%1.5%2.35%2.0%2.0%57.0558.77E58.6E59.1E57.5058.18E58.0058.3458.1557.7859.0E58.6156.8757.4256.9759.05E57.6455.556.858.056.456.8356.7559.0E58.3558.058.3059.056.3557.0057.1556.858.3457.7657.6857.6457.5957.5358.1458.2657.1657.8158.4156.0958.4258.1858.1458.0758.0458.2858.8858.2858.3858.3858.2858.2858.3858.3858.2858.7858.8858.7858.8858.2857.5057.3957.3957.5557.7457.8658.0057.6057.6057.6558.8556.4556.7256.9156.9156.7256.5657.1158.057.858.058.057.657.658.3458.3458.3457.8458.3458.1557.7858.3457.8458.058.057.858.058.258.058.3858.3858.4257.9258.4558.558.558.3558.3558.556.7856.9458.7858.3359.05E58.8057.6458.3857.8858.1257.6258.3857.8859.1059.2058.5058.3058.1058.1758.3557.7757.4057.8457.9357.3657.2257.1457.0557.6658.242.0 %56.562.0%58.258.3558.751.5%2.5%957 958957956955958958957956957958958 957958957958958957957957957958959957 958 1. 8%1GRADING PLAN1" = 20'6020SCALE IN FEET Know what's below. Call before you dig. RGRADING PLANC-201HEM19001PROJECT NO.I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me,or under my direct supervision, and that I am aduly Licensed Professional Engineer under thelaws of the state of MINNESOTA.Stephen M. Johnston1891401/26/2021CITY COMMENTS05/02/19SITE PLANREVIEW04/22/2019NOT FORCONSTRUCTION CIDER RIDGEMARKETPLACEAPPLE VALLEYMINNESOTASHEETCERTIFICATIONREGISTRATION NO.DATEISSUEDATESHEET INDEXPROJECTIDS CENTER80 SOUTH 8TH STREET, SUITE 1850MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402(612) 335-2600D E S I G NCivil Engineering | Landscape Architecture | Construction Services901 N 3rd STREET, SUITE 120MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401www.elanlab.comp 612.260.7980f 612.260.7990PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS05/13/19SITE PLAN RESUBMITTAL05/28/19SITE PLAN RESUBMITTAL06/10/19SITE PLAN RESUBMITTAL01/20/2101/26/21PLANNING RESUBMITTALGRADING NOTES1.VERIFY ALL FIELD CONDITIONS AND UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION. IF ANYDISCREPANCIES OR UNKNOWN UTILITIES ARE FOUND THAT IMPACT DESIGN OR IMPAIR CONSTRUCTION, THEENGINEER AND OWNER SHOULD BE IMMEDIATELY NOTIFIED.2.ALL WORK TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (MNDOT) STANDARDSPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION UNLESS NOTED.3.FOLLOW ALL RECOMMENDATIONS PRESENTED IN GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT .4.SIDEWALLS SHALL BE RETAINED BENCHED OR SLOPED TO PROVIDE SAFE WORKING CONDITIONS. THECONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ASSESSING THE STABILITY OF AND EXECUTING PROJECTEXCAVATIONS USING SAFE METHODS. THE CONTRACTOR IS ALSO RESPONSIBLE FOR NAMINGTHE “COMPETENT INDIVIDUAL” AS PER SUBPART P OF 29 CFR 1926.6 (FEDERAL REGISTER - OSHA).5.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN OF SOIL, UTILITY AND BUILDING RETENTION SYSTEMS.6.PAVEMENT: SEE DETAIL 7/C-501 FOR BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION.7.CONCRETE MIX NO. 3F5# (MNDOT 2461) SHALL BE USED FOR HAND PLACED FORMED CURB AND GUTTER,MEDIANS, DRIVEWAYS, CROSS GUTTERS, SIDEWALKS, PEDESTRIAN RAMPS AND MEDIANS. CONCRETE MIX NO.3M3#, MNDOT SPECIFICATION 2461) SHALL BE USED FOR AN EXTRUSION MACHINE PLACEMENT OF CONCRETE.IN THE PRODUCTION OF CONCRETE, AN AIR ENTRAINING AGENT SHALL BE ADDED TO THE MIX ACCORDING TOMNDOT 2461.4. 8.FORM COATING MATERIAL SHALL MEET MNDOT 3902.9.CONCRETE INSTALLATION SHALL CONFORM WITH MNDOT 2531.10.SITE CONCRETE FINISHING - CONCRETE SHALL BE STRUCK TRUE TO CROSS SECTION AS SHOWN ON THEPLANS. NO ADDITIONAL WATER MAY BE ADDED TO AID IN THE FINISHING PROCESS. A LIGHT BROOM FINISHWILL BE REQUIRED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE CENTER LINE ON ALL CONCRETE WORK UNLESS DIRECTEDOTHERWISE. ALL EXPOSED EDGES AND JOINTS IN CURB,GUTTER, SIDEWALK AND STEPS SHALL BE ROUNDEDWITH A SUITABLE EDGING TOOL. BEFORE FINAL FINISHING, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK THE CONCRETEWITH A TEN (10) FOOT STEEL STRAIGHT EDGE TO ENSURE THERE IS NO VARIATION GREATER THAN 3/16”FROMTHE STRAIGHT EDGE ON TANGENT LINES OR GRADES. IF DEVIATIONS GREATER THAN 3/16” ARE FOUND THEWORK WILL BE CONSIDERED AS UNACCEPTABLE AND WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED ATNO EXPENSE TO THE OWNER.11.CONCRETE CURING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY APPLYING A MEMBRANE CURING COMPOUND (TYPE 2, WHITEPIGMENTED, MNDOT 3754) TO THE EXPOSED SURFACE OF THE CONCRETE WITHIN ONE (1)HOUR AFTERFINISHING THE CONCRETE SURFACES. WHEN THE FORMS ARE REMOVED IN LESS THAN 72 HOURS AFTERPLACING THE CONCRETE, THE CURING COMPOUND SHALL BE APPLIED IMMEDIATELY TO THE EXPOSEDSURFACES. THE RATE OF APPLICATION OF CURING COMPOUND SHALL BE 150 SQUARE FEET PER GALLON.THE COMPOUND SHALL APPEAR AS WHITE AS A SHEET OF PAPER AFTER APPLICATION ON THE CONCRETESURFACE.12.PREFORMED EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL MEET MNDOT 3702, AND SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE FOLLOWINGLOCATIONS: AT THE BEGINNING AND END OF ALL CURB AND GUTTER RADII. WHERE NEW CONCRETESURROUNDS, ADJOINS, OR ABUTS ANY EXISTING FIXED OBJECTS SUCH AS FIRE HYDRANTS, BUILDINGFOUNDATIONS, CONCRETE DRIVEWAYS, SIDEWALKS, AND OTHER RIGID STRUCTURES. AFTER EACH LOAD OFCONCRETE WHEN PLACING CURB AND EVERY 100 FEET WHEN PLACING SIDEWALK. CONTRACTION JOINTSWILL NOT BE SEALED BUT WILL BE REQUIRED AT A SPACING OF 10 FEET ON CURB AND GUTTER AND ONSIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN. CONTRACTION JOINTS WILL BE CUT TO A DEPTH 1/3 THETHICKNESS OF THE CONCRETE, SURFACE AND BACK OF ALL CURBS. CONTRACTION JOINTS SHALL BE PLACEDSO THAT NO SLAB IS LARGER THAN 100 SQUARE FEET IN AREA. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FORCONSTRUCTING CONTRACTION JOINTS THAT PREVENT CONCRETE FROM CRACKING AT OTHER LOCATIONS.13.CONCRETE TESTING INCLUDING SLUMP, AIR ENTRAINMENT, TEMPERATURE AND COMPRESSIVE STRENGTHSHALL BE PERFORMED ON THE FIRST LOAD OF THE DAY FOR ALL CONCRETE POURS OF AT LEAST 4 CUBICYARDS. AN ADDITIONAL TEST SHALL BE PERFORMED FOR EACH 100 CUBIC YARDS OR PORTION THEREOF.14.AGGREGATE BASE FINAL SHAPING AND COMPACTION OF THE AGGREGATE BASE SHALL BE DONE JUST PRIORTO CONSTRUCTION OF THE CONCRETE OR BITUMINOUS SURFACE. THE FINISHED SURFACE OF THE BASESHALL SHOW NO VARIATION GREATER THAN 1/2 INCH FROM A TEN (10) FOOT STRAIGHT EDGE.15.PLANT MIXED BITUMINOUS MIXTURE SHALL BE SPREAD WITHOUT SEGREGATION, AT THE SPECIFIED RATE TOTHE CROSS SECTION SHOWN IN THE PLANS AND PER MNDOT 3151.16.ADJUST ALL SURFACE COURSES TO NOT GREATER THAN 3/16 INCH ABOVE ADJACENT CURB AND VALLEYGUTTERS WHERE WATER FLOWS TO CURB OR VALLEY, AND FLUSH WHERE WATER FLOWS AWAY FROM CURB,OR 1/2 INCH ABOVE MANHOLE FRAMES, VALVE BOXES OR OTHER FIXED STRUCTURES.17.THE THICKNESS OF EACH BITUMINOUS COURSE SHALL BE WITHIN 1/4 INCH OF THE THICKNESS AS SHOWN ONTHE PLANS. THE TOTAL THICKNESS OF ALL BITUMINOUS COURSES SHALL BE WITHIN 1/2 INCH.18.PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTING THE BITUMINOUS BINDER AND/OR WEARING COURSES, THE CONTRACTOR SHALLSWEEP ROADWAY. THE SWEEPER SHALL BE A SELF-PROPELLED PICK-UP (WITH WATER) SWEEPER. ASIDE-THROW SWEEPER WILL NOT BE ALLOWED.19.TACK COAT SHALL CONFORM TO MNDOT 2357.2.A.20.BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTS SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 92% OF THE MAXIMUM THEORETICAL DENSITY. THEOWNER MAY AT THEIR OPTION PERFORM AGGREGATE AND BITUMINOUS TESTING. THE COST OF ALL FAILINGTESTS MAY BE BACK-CHARGED TO THE CONTRACTOR.IMPERVIOUSPERVIOUSEXISTINGPROPOSEDBUILDINGTOTAL IMPVNPDES AREA SUMMARY0.349 ACRESPAVEMENT1.125 ACRES0.512 ACRES1.282 ACRESTOTAL1.474 ACRES1.794 ACRES5.726 ACRES5.406 ACRES7.200 ACRES7.200 ACRES 145TH STREETCEDAR AVENUE (CO.RD. NO. 23)>>FFE 958.5145TH STREETCEDAR AVENUE (CO.RD. NO. 23)>>>>>>>>>>FFE 958.5>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>957 958957956955958958957956957958958 957958957958958957957957957958959957 958 SILT FENCE(TYP)ROCKCONSTRUCTIONENTRANCE5C-503SILT FENCE(TYP)1C-503SILT FENCE(TYP)6C-503INLET PROTECTION(TYP)FILTER LOG(TYP)4C-503FILTER LOGSEDIMENT CONTROL(TYP)INLETPROTECTION(TYP)2C-503TREE PROTECTIONFENCE (TYP)INLET PROTECTION(TYP)INLET PROTECTION(TYP)INLET PROTECTION(TYP)INLET PROTECTION(TYP)SILT FENCE(TYP)TREE PROTECTIONFENCE (TYP)TREE PROTECTIONFENCE (TYP)TREE PROTECTIONFENCE (TYP)1EROSION CONTROL PLAN1" = 20'6020SCALE IN FEET Know what's below. Call before you dig. REROSION CONTROLPLANC-203HEM19001PROJECT NO.I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me,or under my direct supervision, and that I am aduly Licensed Professional Engineer under thelaws of the state of MINNESOTA.Stephen M. Johnston1891401/26/2021CITY COMMENTS05/02/19SITE PLANREVIEW04/22/2019NOT FORCONSTRUCTION CIDER RIDGEMARKETPLACEAPPLE VALLEYMINNESOTASHEETCERTIFICATIONREGISTRATION NO.DATEISSUEDATESHEET INDEXPROJECTIDS CENTER80 SOUTH 8TH STREET, SUITE 1850MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402(612) 335-2600D E S I G NCivil Engineering | Landscape Architecture | Construction Services901 N 3rd STREET, SUITE 120MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401www.elanlab.comp 612.260.7980f 612.260.7990PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS05/13/19SITE PLAN RESUBMITTAL05/28/19SITE PLAN RESUBMITTAL06/10/19SITE PLAN RESUBMITTAL01/20/2101/26/21PLANNING RESUBMITTALLEGENDSTORM STRUCTURE PROTECTIONSILT FENCEFILTER LOG SEDIMENT CONTROLSOD & LANDSCAPE PLANTINGSEE LANDSCAPE PLANFILTER LOG DITCH CHECK DAM 145TH STREETCEDAR AVENUE (CO.RD. NO. 23)>>FFE 958.5>>>>>>>>>>FFE 958.5>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>FES 955.54" FIRE SERVICECONNECT TO EXISTINGWITH 6" X 4" TEEAND 4" VALVEPROPOSED UTILITYEASEMENTPVC PIPEBEDDING (TYP)1C-504GATE VALVE & BOXINSTALLATION (TYP)2C-50432" DIA CATCH BASIN3C-504PRECAST CONCRETEHEADWALL (TYP)4C-50427' - 8" PVC@7.63%50' -12" PVC@0.25%CB 148" DIAR-3067 CASTINGRE 956.61IE 953.11 (S)IE 953.44 (N)SANITARY SEWER CONNECTIONCUT IN WYE- INV 946.5 +/-20' - 12" PVC @1.0%REBUILD 48" DIA CBMH AS NEEDEDTO CONNECT NEW INLET INVERT 852.3R-1642 CASTINGRE 956.3IE 952.2BASIN OUTLETINV 952.456" GATE VALVEHYDRANT1.5" DOMESTIC SERVICECONNECT TO EXISTING MAINWITH 1.5" CORP AND SADDLEINSTALL 1.5" CURB STOP30' - 12" PVC @ 3.1%EXISTINGHYDRANTRELOCATE EXISTING HYDRANTPLUG EXISTING TEEINSTALL NEW TEE AND LEADCB 8A32" DIA R-1792-HG CASTINGRE 956.09IE 953.40PVC ROOF DRAINSIZED BY MECHANICALCONNECT BY WYE BETWEENSTMH 2 AND STMH 5PROPOSED UNDERGROUNDSTORMWATER BASINCONSISTING OF FIVE ROWS OF 48"DIA CMP 80' IN LENGTH WITHHEADERS SURROUNDED BYCRUSHED ROCK.PIPE INVERT 949.56" X 6" TEESTMH 232" DIAR-1792-HG CASTINGRE 958.5IE 952.98INLET 38" RISERRE 958.35IE 952.91INLET 48" RISERRE 958.35IE 952.7826' -15" PVC@0.25%53' -15" PVC@0.25%32' -15" PVC@0.25%STMH 548" DIAR-1642 CASTINGRE 958.6IE 952.70CBMH 648" DIAR-1792-FG CASTINGRE 957.60IE 952.60 (W & E)IE 953.0 (S)39' -15" PVC@0.25%CB 732" DIAR-1792-FG CASTINGRE 957.60IE 954.1038' -8" PVC@ 2.9%71 -15" PVC@0.25%IE 952.94YARD DRAIN6C-504SOLID PIPE IN THIS SECTIONWEIR WALL AND STAND PIPETO FACILITATE SEDIMENTREMOVALCB 848" DIA R-1792-HG CASTINGRE 956.09IE 953.33IE 952.41UTILITY PLAN1" = 20'6020SCALE IN FEET Know what's below. Call before you dig. RUTILITY PLANC-301HEM19001PROJECT NO.I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me,or under my direct supervision, and that I am aduly Licensed Professional Engineer under thelaws of the state of MINNESOTA.Stephen M. Johnston1891401/26/2021CITY COMMENTS05/02/19SITE PLANREVIEW04/22/2019NOT FORCONSTRUCTION CIDER RIDGEMARKETPLACEAPPLE VALLEYMINNESOTASHEETCERTIFICATIONREGISTRATION NO.DATEISSUEDATESHEET INDEXPROJECTIDS CENTER80 SOUTH 8TH STREET, SUITE 1850MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402(612) 335-2600D E S I G NCivil Engineering | Landscape Architecture | Construction Services901 N 3rd STREET, SUITE 120MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401www.elanlab.comp 612.260.7980f 612.260.7990PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS05/13/19SITE PLAN RESUBMITTAL05/28/19SITE PLAN RESUBMITTAL06/10/19SITE PLAN RESUBMITTAL01/20/2101/26/21PLANNING RESUBMITTALUTILITY NOTES1.VERIFY ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITY SERVICES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ANYDISCREPANCIES BETWEEN LOCATED UTILITIES AND THE EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN SHOULD BENOTED AND FORWARDED TO THE ENGINEER.2.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE MEANS AND METHODS TO ASSURE ADJACENT PROPERTY ISNOT DAMAGED DURING UTILITY INSTALLATION.3.PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ARE MEASURED FROM CENTER OF STRUCTURE TO CENTER OF STRUCTURE.4.UTILITY SERVICE LOCATIONS WITHIN BUILDING ARE SHOWN CORRECT AS OF THE DATE OF THISPLAN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS BY COMPARING THIS PLAN WITH THEMECHANICAL PLANS PRIOR TO ANY UTILITY CONSTRUCTION.5.PIPE MATERIALS: (TO BE VERIFIED) WATERMAIN4" & 6" DIP CLASS 52STORM SEWERPVC (SCH 40) & CMPSANITARY SEWERPVC (SCH 40)6.ALL UTILITY CONSTRUCTION TO CONFORM WITH STATE, CITY ENGINEER'S ASSOCIATION OFMINNESOTA (CEAM), MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE AND CITY OF APPLE VALLEY STANDARDSPECIFICATIONS.7.ADJUST ALL STRUCTURES, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, TO PROPOSED GRADES WHERE DISTURBED.COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF UTILITY OWNERS. STRUCTURES BEING RESET TO PAVEDAREAS TO MEET OWNERS REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC LOADING.8.PROVIDE A MINIMUM 8' TO A MAXIMUM OF 10' OF COVER OVER ALL NEW WATERMAIN.9.UTILITY AND MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS MUST COORDINATE THE INSTALLATION OF ALL WATERAND SEWER PIPES INTO THE BUILDING TO ACCOMMODATE CITY INSPECTION AND TESTING.10.ALL COMPONENTS OF THE WATER SYSTEM, UP TO THE WATER METER OR FIRE SERVICEEQUIPMENT MUST UTILIZE PROTECTIVE INTERNAL COATINGS MEETING CURRENT ANSI/AWWASTANDARDS FOR CEMENT MORTAR LINING OR SPECIAL COATINGS. THE USE OF UNLINED ORUNCOATED PIPE IS NOT ALLOWED. TRASH ENCLOSURE1L-501DECIDUOUS TREEPLANTING (TYP)3L-501SHRUB PLANTING(TYP)7L-501PLANTING AT PARKINGISLAND (TYP)2L-501CONIFEROUSTREE PLANTING(TYP)4L-501PERENNIALPLANTING (TYP)5L-501EDGING ATPLANTING BED (TYP)6L-501SOD AT HARDSCAPE(TYP)6' PRIVACY FENCE ONPROPERTY LINEMONUMENT SIGNPIPELINEEASEMENTINSTALL TREES OUTSIDEEASEMENTSSHRUBS PLANTINGWITHIN PIPELINE EASEMENTLOW PLANTING WITHIN45' SLIGHT TRIANGLE8L-501BIKE RACK(TYP)PROVIDE 30" CLEARSPACE FOR VEHICLEOVERHANGEXISTING CONIFEROUSTREES (TYP)EXISTING CONIFEROUSTREE (TYP)BOULDER RETAININGWALLSOD RESTORATIONEXISTING TREE(TYP)RELOCATED TREE 9' FROMEXISTING LOCATION9L-501SPADEDTREE (TYP)9'TREE PLANTING 15' MIN.FROM EXISTING GAS LINE15'TREE PLANTING WITHINDRAINAGE & UTILITYEASEMENTEXISTING VEGETATIONPROVIDE 30" CLEARSPACE FOR VEHICLEOVERHANGRELOCATED TREES 8' FROMEXISTING LOCATION8'8'145TH STREETCEDAR AVENUE (CO.RD. NO. 23)NO PARKINGNO PARKING NO PARKINGNO PARKINGCOFFEE2,060 +/- SF.RETAIL5,040 +/- SF.1LANDSCAPE PLAN1" = 20'6020SCALE IN FEET Know what's below. Call before you dig. RLANDSCAPE PLANL-101LANDSCAPE SUMMARYHEM19001PROJECT NO.01/26/2021CITY COMMENTS05/02/19SITE PLANREVIEW04/22/2019NOT FORCONSTRUCTION CIDER RIDGEMARKETPLACEAPPLE VALLEYMINNESOTASHEETCERTIFICATIONREGISTRATION NO.DATEISSUEDATESHEET INDEXPROJECTIDS CENTER80 SOUTH 8TH STREET, SUITE 1850MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402(612) 335-2600D E S I G NCivil Engineering | Landscape Architecture | Construction Services901 N 3rd STREET, SUITE 120MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401www.elanlab.comp 612.260.7980f 612.260.7990I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me,or under my direct supervision, and that I am aduly Licensed Landscape Architect under the lawsof the state of MINNESOTA.Pilarsinee Saraithong45059PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS05/13/19SITE PLAN RESUBMITTAL05/28/19SITE PLAN RESUBMITTAL06/10/19SITE PLAN RESUBMITTAL01/20/2101/26/21PLANNING RESUBMITTALSODEXISTING TREELANDSCAPE NOTES1.LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FINISHED GRADING AND POSITIVE SURFACE DRAINAGEIN ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR MUST ENSURE THAT THE FINAL GRADES ARE METAS SHOWN ON GRADING PLAN. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND, IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY LANDSCAPEARCHITECT FOR RESOLUTION.2.ALL PLANT MATERIALS ARE TO CONFORM WITH STATE & LOCAL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS AND THECURRENT ADDITION OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN STANDARDS. ALL PLANTMATERIALS ARE TO BE HEALTHY, HARDY STOCK, AND FREE FROM ANY DISEASES, DAMAGE, ANDDISFIGURATION.3.QUANTITIES OF PLANTS LISTED ON THE PLAN ARE TO GOVERN ANY DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THEQUANTITIES SHOWN ON THE PLANT SCHEDULE AND PLAN. PLACE PLANTS IN PROPER SPACINGFOLLOWING LAYOUT FIGURES.4.TOPSOIL TO BE MNDOT 3877.2B LOAM TOPSOIL BORROW FOR LANDSCAPED AREAS AND PLANTINGBEDS. PROVIDE ROOTING TOPSOIL BORROW MNDOT 3877.2E FOR PLANT RESTORATION, WATERQUALITY, AND INFILTRATION PLANTING.5.PLANTING SOIL TO BE CONSISTED OF 50% SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW (MNDOT 3877) AND 50% GRADE 2COMPOST (MNDOT 3890). PLANTING SOIL TO HAVE A PH BETWEEN 6.5-7.5, BE FREE OF CHEMICALCONTAMINANTS, DEBRIS, LARGE ROCKS GREATER THAN 1/ 2" DIAMETER, AND FRAGMENTS OF WOOD.SUBSOIL SHALL BE SCARIFIED TO A DEPTH OF 4" BEFORE PLANTING SOIL IS SPREAD.6.SPREAD PLANTING SOIL AT MINIMUM EIGHTEEN (18) INCH DEEP IN ALL PLANTING BEDS PRIOR TOPLANTING. THOROUGHLY WATER TWICE TO FACILITATE CONSOLIDATION PRIOR TO PLANTING. DO NOTOVERLY COMPACT SOIL.7.MULCH TO BE SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARK MULCH (MNDOT 3882 TYPE 6), CONSISTED OF RAW WOODMATERIAL FROM TIMBER AND BE A PRODUCT OF A MECHANICAL CHIPPER, HAMMER MILL, OR TUBGRINDER. THE MATERIAL SHALL BE SUBSTANTIALLY FREE OF MOLD, DIRT, SAWDUST, AND FOREIGNMATERIAL AND SHALL NOT BE IN AN ADVANCED STATE OF DECOMPOSITION. THE MATERIAL SHALL NOTCONTAIN CHIPPED UP MANUFACTURED BOARDS OR CHEMICALLY TREATED WOOD, INCLUDING, BUT NOTLIMITED TO, WATER BOARD, PARTICLE BOARD, AND CHROMATED COPPER ARSENATE (CCA) OR PENTATREATED WOOD. THE MATERIAL SHALL BE TWICE-GROUND/ SHREDDED, SUCH THAT; NO INDIVIDUALPIECE SHALL EXCEED 2 INCHES IN ANY DIMENSION.8.APPLY FOUR (4) INCH DEPTH OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARK MULCH IN FOUR (4) FOOT DIAMETER RINGAROUND ALL TREES.9.EDGE ALL SHRUB BEDS WITH 3/ 16" X 5" MILL FINISHED ALUMINUM EDGING WITH STAKES. ALL EDGING TOBE COMMERCIAL GRADE.10.APPLY THREE (3) INCH DEPTH OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARK MULCH IN ALL SHRUB BED AREAS ANDAPPLY TWO (2) INCH DEPTH OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARK MULCH IN PERENNIAL AREAS. PRIOR TOMULCHING, APPLY PRE-EMERGENT HERBICIDE TO ALL PLANTING BEDS.11.ALL TREES SHALL HAVE LOWER BRANCH AT 6 FEET MINIMUM ABOVE SIDEWALK.12.THE ENTIRE LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE IRRIGATED WITH AN UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION SYSTEM. NOWATER IS ALLOWED ON ANY PAVEMENT, PARKING, WALKWAY, AND BUILDING. THE IRRIGATIONCONTRACTOR IS TO DESIGN AND SUBMIT SHOP DRAWING OF IRRIGATION DESIGN AND CALCULATIONS TOLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW 5 DAYS PRIOR TO PURCHASING AND INSTALLATION. IRRIGATIONDESIGN IS TO MEET ALL CITY AND STATE PLUMBING CODES AND REQUIREMENTS.13.FOLLOW LANDSCAPE DETAILS FOR ALL INSTALLATION, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.14.LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN PLANTS IN HEALTHY CONDITION THROUGHOUT WARRANTYPERIOD. THE WARRANTY PERIOD IS TWO FULL YEARS FROM DATE OF PROVISIONAL ACCEPTANCE UNTILFINAL ACCEPTANCE. WARRANTY PERIOD FOR PLANT MATERIAL INSTALLED AFTER JUNE 1ST SHALLCOMMENCE THE FOLLOWING YEAR.CONIFEROUS TREES36' HT.B&B25'H X 6'W58POT3'H X 4'W1B&B40'H X 35'WACER X FREEMANII'SIENNA'2.5" CAL.SIENNA GLENMAPLE3B&B50'H X 35'W2.5" CAL.CONIFEROUS SHRUBSPERENNIALSRUDBECKIA FULGIDAVAR. 'DEAMII'DEAMII BLACKEYED SUSANQUANT.KEYCOMMON NAMESCIENTIFIC NAMESIZEROOTCOND.DECIDUOUS TREESMATURESIZE10POT2'H X 3'WHYDRANGEA ARBORESCENS'HCHA5'INVINCIBLE WEEWHITE HYDRANGEAGYMNOCLADUS DIOICUS'ESPRESSO - JFS'ESPRESSO KENTUCKYCOFFEETREE1 GAL.POT2'H X 1.5'W5 GAL.5 GAL.SPIRAEA X BUMALDA'ANTHONY WATERER'ANTHONY WATERERSPIREASUBSTITUTIONS: IF ANY SUBSTITUTIONS ARE REQUIRED, SUBMIT WRITTEN DOCUMENTS AND PROPOSEDSUBSTITUTIONS TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL 5 DAYS PRIOR TO PURCHASEAND/OR INSTALLATION.JUNIPERUS HORIZONTALIS'HUGHES'HUGHES JUNIPER5 GAL.POT1.5'H X 5'W27275PARKINGTOTAL PARKING AREA FOR 2 LOTS 45,211 SF. REQUIREDPROPOSEDLANDSCAPE ISLANDS907 SF. (2%)2,911 SF. (6.4%)2.5" CAL. TREE/ 150 SF.6 TREES5 - 2.5" TREES + 3 - 6' HT' ON 2 LOTSESTIMATED LANDSCAPEESTIMATED BUILDING CONSTRUCTION COST 7,100 SF. X $200 = $1.42MREQUIRED ESTIMATED LANDSCAPE VALUE 2.5% MIN.LOT 2 LANDSCAPE VALUE = $37,510 +/- (2.6%)5 - 2.5" CAL. DECIDUOUS TREES X $650 = $3,250 3 - 6' HT. CONIFEROUS TREES X $650 = $1,950173 - 5 GAL SHRUBS X $70 = $12,110357 - 1 GAL PERENNIALS X $20 = $7,14025 CY MULCH X $75 = $1,875265 LF EDGING X $14 = $3,710450 SY SOD X $5.50 = $2,475BOULDER & ROCKIRRIGATION $5,000PLANT SCHEDULELEGENDPICEA ABIES'CUPRESSINA'CUPRESSINA NORWAYSPRUCE3B&B2.5" CAL.GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOSVAR INERMIS 'HARVE'NORTHERN ACCLIAMHONEYLOCUST40'H X 35'WSALVIA NEMROSABALYRICLU'LYRICAL BLUESSALVIAHEMEROCALLIS'STELLA SUPREME'STELLA SUPREMEDAYLILYCALAMAGROSTISACUTIFLORA'KARL FOERSTER'KARL FOERSTERFEATHER REED GRASS1 GAL.POT1.5'H X 1.5'W1 GAL.POT4'H X 2'W1 GAL.POT2'H X 2'W11POT12'H X 6'WTHUJA OCCIDENTALIS'TECHNY'TECHNYARBORVITAE10 GAL.58POT2'H X 4'WRHUS AROMATICA'GRO-LOW'GRO-LOWFRAGRANT SUMAC5 GAL.TREE PRESERVATION SUMMARYREMOVEDREPLACEDRELOCATE 2 - 3" & 1- 4" ON-SITE TREE-REMOVE 14 ON-SITE SIGNIFICANT TREES 7 - 2.5" DECIDUOUS + 5 - 6' HT CONIFEROUSTOTAL 155 INCHES DBH = 155 X 10% = 15.5 INCHESTOTAL 30 INCHES ON-SITE26' HT.B&B40'H X 20'WPICEA GLAUCA'DENSATA'BLACK HILLSSPRUCEDECIDUOUS SHRUBSDIERVILLA LONICERADWARF BUSHHONEYSUCKLE5 GAL.POT3'H X 4'W76170LIRIOPE SPICATACREEPINGLILYTURF1 GAL.POT1'H X 1.5'WBOUTELOUACURTIPENDULASIDEOATS GRAMA1 GAL.POTSPOROBOLUSHETEROLEPISPRAIRIE DROPSEED1 GAL.POTSLOPE TREATMENTWITH 12" - 36 " BOULDERS6" - 8" ROCKS SPREADING BETWEEN2'H X 2'W2'H X 3'WHEMEROCALLIS'PASSIONATE RETURNSPASSIONATE RETURNSDAYLILY1 GAL.POT1.5'H X 1.5'W A200A2 A200 B3 A200 A3 A200 A1 A B C 33' - 4"32' - 10" 66' - 2" 1,903 SF SUITE 100 100 4,705 SF SUITE 200 200 MECH 500 1 2 3 4 5 6 20' - 0"20' - 0"20' - 0"20' - 0"21' - 4"101' - 4"POTENTIAL FUTURE TENANT WALL LOCATION A200A2 A200 B3 A200 A3 A200 A1 A B C RTU VERIFY LOCATION SLOPED STRUCTURE TO INTERNAL ROOF DRAINS PREFINISHED METAL ROOFTOP SCREENING PREFINISHED METAL OVERANG 1 2 3 4 5 6 PREFINISHED METAL ROOFTOP SCREENING ARCHITECTURE, INCCopyright 2018 DJR Architecture, Inc.C B AD 4 3 2 1 333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.comCLIENTIssue:Date:Project #:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:CONTRACTORSTRUCTURAL CIVILI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota.SIGNATUREREGISTRATION NUMBERDATEPRINT NAMENOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONA100FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 1APPLE VALLEY, MN18-0771-20-2021CWSNCIDER RIDGE MARKETPLACEApproverDesigner1-20-20211/8" = 1'-0"A1 FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 1 1/8" = 1'-0"B1 ROOF PLAN NN Planning Resubmittal1-26-2021 LEVEL 1 100' -0" T.O. STOREFRONT 110' -0" T.O. PARAPET 119' -6" ABC PREFINISHED METAL PANEL - CHARCOAL STONE VENEER - GREY CEMENTITIOUS PANEL - CREAM ALUMINUM STOREFRONT - DARK BRONZE21' - 6"STEPPED-BACK PARAPET SCREENING - CHARCOAL LEVEL 1 100' -0" T.O. STOREFRONT 110' -0" T.O. PARAPET 119' -6" SIGNAGE BY TENANT 1 2 3 4 5 6 SIGNAGE BY TENANT CEMENTITIOUS PANEL - CREAM 23' - 6"ALUMINUM STOREFRONT - DARK BRONZE PREFINISHED METAL PANEL - CHARCOAL STONE VENEER - GREY19' - 6"STEPPED-BACK PARAPET SCREENING - CHARCOAL STEPPED-BACK PARAPET SCREENING - CHARCOAL LEVEL 1 100' -0" T.O. STOREFRONT 110' -0" T.O. PARAPET 119' -6" A B C CEMENTITIOUS PANEL - CREAM ALUMINUM STOREFRONT - DARK BRONZE PREFINISHED METAL PANEL - CHARCOAL STONE VENEER - GREY DRIVE THRU WINDOW23' - 6"STEPPED-BACK PARAPET SCREENING - CHARCOAL LEVEL 1 100' -0" T.O. STOREFRONT 110' -0" T.O. PARAPET 119' -6" ALUMINUM STOREFRONT - DARK BRONZE PREFINISHED METAL PANEL - CHARCOAL SIGNAGE BY TENANT 123456 CEMENTITIOUS PANEL - CREAM PREFINISHED METAL PANEL - CHARCOAL STONE VENEER - GREY CEMENTITIOUS PANEL - CREAM23' - 6"STEPPED-BACK PARAPET SCREENING - CHARCOAL CEMENTITIOUS PANEL - CREAM STEPPED-BACK PARAPET SCREENING - CHARCOAL ARCHITECTURE, INCCopyright 2018 DJR Architecture, Inc.C B AD 4 3 2 1 333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.comCLIENTIssue:Date:Project #:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:CONTRACTOR STRUCTURAL CIVILI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota.SIGNATUREREGISTRATION NUMBER DATEPRINT NAMENOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONA200EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSAPPLE VALLEY, MN18-0771-20-2021CWSNCIDER RIDGE MARKETPLACEApproverDesigner1-20-20211/8" = 1'-0"B3 NORTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"A2 EAST EXTERIOR ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"A3 SOUTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"A1 WEST EXTERIOR ELEVATION Planning Resubmittal1-26-2021 ARCHITECTURE, INCCopyright 2018 DJR Architecture, Inc.C B AD 4 3 2 1 333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.comCLIENTIssue:Date:Project #:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:CONTRACTOR STRUCTURAL CIVILI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota.SIGNATUREREGISTRATION NUMBER DATEPRINT NAMENOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONA210PERSPECTIVESAPPLE VALLEY, MN18-0771-20-2021CWSNCIDER RIDGE MARKETPLACEApproverDesigner1-20-20211 PERSPECTIVE FROM SE 3 PERSPECTIVE FROM NW 2 PERSPECTIVE FROM SW CORNER 4 AERIAL FROM SE 5 AERIAL FROM NW Planning Submittal4-3-2019 © 2019 DJR Architecture EXTERIOR RENDERING Cider Ridge Marketplace 18-077.01 Apple Valley, Minnesota 01.26.2020 PERSPECTIVE - NORTHWEST VIEW © 2019 DJR Architecture EXTERIOR RENDERING Cider Ridge Marketplace 18-077.01 Apple Valley, Minnesota 01.26.2020 PERSPECTIVE - WEST VIEW © 2019 DJR Architecture EXTERIOR RENDERING Cider Ridge Marketplace 18-077.01 Apple Valley, Minnesota 01.26.2020 PERSPECTIVE - SOUTHEAST VIEW © 2019 DJR Architecture EXTERIOR RENDERING Cider Ridge Marketplace 18-077.01 Apple Valley, Minnesota 01.26.2020 PERSPECTIVE - NORTH VIEW © 2019 DJR Architecture EXTERIOR RENDERING Cider Ridge Marketplace 18-077.01 Apple Valley, Minnesota 01.26.2020 PERSPECTIVE - NORTHEAST VIEW City of MEMO Building Inspections TO: Kathy Bodmer, Planning FROM: George Dorn, Building Official DATE: February 23, 2021 SUBJECT: 7477 145th Street Cider Ridge Marketplace SAC determination is required from Met Council prior to permit issuance from the city. Geotechnical report boring log and Special Inspector Agreement is required prior to permit and soil corrections on site. Submit plans to Minnesota Department of Labor, Plumbing Division for review of proposed plumbing, roof drainage, sanitary and storm design. Trash area is required per MSBC 2015 1303.1500 Subpart 1 requires recycling space in accordance with Table 1-A on plans issued for permit. Separate sign permits are required. Structural drawings will be required for review. The City of Apple Valley has adopted the 2020 MSBC 1306, subpart 3 Special Fire Protection systems. This section would require the building to have an automatic sprinkler system installed based on occupancy type and square footage. The allowable area and building heights will be determined once the code analysis has been completed. A grease interceptor may be required for this project per City Ordinance Chapter 51.08 (B) (d) based on type of occupancies leased. Platting of the property lines must be completed prior to permit issuance. Per MSAC 502.4.4, the access aisles for the accessible areas shall be marked with a designation sign that says “no parking. Review areas under consideration for accessible parking areas. CITY OF MEMO Public Works TO: Kathy Bodmer, Planner FROM: Brandon S. Anderson, City Engineer DATE: February 26, 2021 SUBJECT: Cider Ridge Marketplace Site Plan Review – 145th and Cedar Kathy, The following are preliminary Engineering comments regarding the Cider Ridge Marketplace Site Plan dated 01-26-21. General 1. Drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated on final plat over all public infrastructure. 2. All work and infrastructure within public easements or right of way shall be to City standards. 3. Provide a narrative of how the buildings will be constructed and any impacts. The narrative shall include the following: a. Shoring (if applicable) b. Material Storage. c. Haul routes to and from the site. d. Phasing Permits 4. Provide a copy of the executed Encroachment Agreement with Magellan Pipeline for work occurring within easement area as indicated on plans. 5. A Dakota County Right-of-Way permit will be required for work within the Cedar Avenue right-of-way. 6. A Natural Resource Management Permit (NRMP) will be required prior to any land disturbing activity commences. 7. Underground Storm water Maintenance Agreement will be required for the privately owned storm water treatment facility. Site 8. Final site plan shall be reviewed with the construction plans and approved by City Engineer. 9. See attached Memo from SRF regarding the review of Traffic Impact Study and internal traffic circulation concerns regarding drive thru operation and parking conflicts. 10. Preliminary Plat shall indicate required 5’ and 10’ side lot easements for proposed Lot 2 block 1. 11. No Structures are allowed within drainage and utility easements. Menu Boards are not allowed in easement areas as indicated on the site plan. Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control 12. Provide overall site composite Curve Number (CN) on the plans. 13. Final grading, drainage, and erosion control plan shall be reviewed with the construction plans and approved by City Engineer. 14. All drainage swales and turfed areas shall be at 2% minimum slope. 15. Roof drain connections should be shown on utility plan. No direct discharge with building/roof drainage will be allowed to ROW and should be connected to storm sewer where possible. 16. Show all emergency over flow (EOF) elevations. The finished floor/low opening elevation must be 1’ minimum above the EOF elevation and 3’ minimum above 100-year high water level. 17. Provide soil borings and geotechnical report for the proposed underground storm water facility. 18. Proposed curb opening for the new parking lot to the north should be directed to an infiltration basin or storm sewer. 19. Provide details of construction for proposed underground storage basin. Sanitary Sewer, Water Main and Storm Sewer 20. Final locations and sizes of Sanitary & Storm Sewer and Water main shall be reviewed with the final construction plans and approved by City Engineer. Extension of Sanitary Sewer and Water main that serve more than one lot shall be publicly owned and maintained and be constructed to City Standards. 21. Provide additional drawing showing required hydrant coverage for site along with proposed water main connections. 22. Domestic water and fire service shall be split outside the existing building and the valves shall be located 1.5 times the height of the building away from the building or placed in location readily accessible per City of Apple Valley standard detail plate SER-6. Only one service tap to water main will be allowed. 23. Additional Gate Valve and Hydrant will be required at the end of existing water main along 145th for future connection. Future connection should be extended outside parking lot limits in SE corner of site. Additional valve or curb stop should be provided in accordance with City standards at existing service to proposed Lot 1 Block 1. Sanitary sewer should be extended past driveway at this time to prevent driveway closure at future date to make connection. 24. Additional detail is required for storm sewer penetration of proposed private retaining wall. Landcape and Natural Resources 25. No major tree plantings shall be located over any underground utilities. Clusters of trees shall be used near or around these areas instead of planting in a row. 26. Plans should indicate replacement of trees removed in Cedar Avenue ROW. Memorandum www.srfconsulting.com 3701 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 100 | Minneapolis, MN 55416-3791 | 763.475.0010 Equal Employment Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer SRF No. 02114247 To: Brandon Anderson, PE, City Engineer City of Apple Valley From: Tom Sachi, PE, Associate Brent Clark, PE, Senior Engineer Date: February 11, 2021 Subject: Cider Ridge Development Traffic Study; Apple Valley, MN Introduction SRF has completed a traffic study for the proposed Cider Ridge development located in the northeast quadrant of the Cedar Avenue/145th Street intersection in the City of Apple Valley (see Figure 1: Project Location). As part of the Jardin Center/Cider Ridge Traffic Study, completed by SRF in 2019, development assumptions for the Cider Ridge development were assumed in the previously completed analysis. Since completion of the Jardin Center/Cider Ridge Traffic Study, development assumptions of the Cider Ridge development have been refined. Therefore, the main objectives of this study are to review existing operations within the study area, evaluate transportation impacts of the Cider Ridge development, and recommend any necessary improvements to accommodate the development. The following information provides the assumptions, analysis, and recommendations offered for consideration. Existing Conditions Existing conditions were reviewed to establish a baseline to identify any future impacts associated with the proposed development. The evaluation of existing conditions includes turning movement counts, field observations, and an intersection capacity analysis. Data Collection Peak period intersection turning movement counts were collected at the Cedar Avenue/145th Street intersection the week of May 20, 2019 during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. In addition, observations were completed to identify roadway characteristics (i.e. roadway geometry, posted speed limits, and traffic controls) and driver behavior within the study area. Cedar Avenue, a principal arterial, is primarily a six-lane divided roadway immediately adjacent to the proposed development, while 145th Street, a local roadway, is a two-lane undivided roadway with turn lanes. The posted speed limits along Cedar Avenue and 145th Street are 45 miles per hour (mph) and 30 mph, respectively. The Cedar Avenue/145th Street intersection is signalized. Existing geometrics, traffic controls, and volumes are shown in Figure 2. 02114247 January 2021 Project Location Cider Ridge Development Traffic Study City of Apple Valley, MN Figure 1NORTHNorthH:\Projects\14000\14247\TraffStudy\Figures\Fig01_Project Location.cdrCider Ridge Development 145th Street Cedar AvenueROAD23 COUNTY 147th Street Glazier Avenue 02114247 January 2021 Existing Conditions Cider Ridge Development Traffic Study City of Apple Valley, MN Figure 2NORTHNorthH:\Projects\14000\14247\TraffStudy\Figures\Fig02_Existing Conditions.cdr (81) 115(1380) 1828(8) 14Cedar Avenue96 (212)1043 (2718)14 (15) 145th Street (104) 104 (11) 10 (95) 86 24 (31) 11 (13) 0 (3) 145th Street Cedar AvenueROAD23 COUNTY Cider Ridge Development Glazier Avenue XX (XX) - A.M. Peak Hour Volume - P.M. Peak Hour Volume - Side-Street Stop Control - Signalized Control LEGEND Cider Ridge Development Traffic Study February 11, 2021 Page 4 Intersection Capacity Analysis An existing intersection capacity analysis was completed for the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours to establish a baseline condition to which future traffic operations can be compared. Study intersections were analyzed using Synchro/SimTraffic (Version 9). Capacity analysis results identify a Level of Service (LOS), which indicates the quality of traffic flow through an intersection. Intersections are given a ranking from LOS A through LOS F. The LOS results are based on average delay per vehicle, which correspond to the delay threshold values shown in Table 1. LOS A indicates the best traffic operation, with vehicles experiencing minimal delays. LOS F indicates an intersection where demand exceeds capacity, or a breakdown of traffic flow. Overall intersection LOS A through LOS D is generally considered acceptable in the Twin Cities Metro Area. Table 1 Level of Service Criteria for Signalized and Unsignalized Intersections LOS Designation Signalized Intersection Average Delay/Vehicle (seconds) Unsignalized Intersection Average Delay/Vehicle (seconds) A ≤ 10 ≤ 10 B > 10 - 20 > 10 - 15 C > 20 - 35 > 15 - 25 D > 35 - 55 > 25 - 35 E > 55 - 80 > 35 - 50 F > 80 > 50 For side-street stop controlled intersections, special emphasis is given to providing an estimate for the level of service of the side-street approach. Traffic operations at an unsignalized intersection with side-street stop control can be described in two ways. First, consideration is given to the overall intersection level of service. This accounts for the total number of vehicles entering the intersection and the capability of the intersection to support these volumes. Second, it is important to consider the delay on the minor approach. Since the mainline does not have to stop, the majority of delay is attributed to the side-street approaches. It is typical of intersections with higher mainline traffic volumes to experience high levels of delay (i.e. poor levels of service) on the side-street approaches, but an acceptable overall intersection level of service during peak hour conditions. Results of the existing intersection capacity analysis shown in Table 2 indicate that the study intersections currently operate at an acceptable overall LOS B during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours with the existing geometric layout and traffic controls. No significant delay or queuing issues were identified. Note the existing westbound right-turn 95th percentile queue is approximately 30 feet with average westbound delays of 20 seconds. Table 2 Existing Intersection Capacity Analysis Intersection A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour LOS (Delay) LOS (Delay) Cedar Avenue and 145th Street B (13 sec.) B (16 sec.) Cider Ridge Development Traffic Study February 11, 2021 Page 5 Year 2022 Build Conditions To determine any impacts associated with the proposed development, year 2022 build conditions were reviewed. The year 2022 build conditions account for historical general area background growth, as well as the proposed and adjacent developments. Background Traffic Growth To account for general background growth in the area, an annual growth rate of one (1) percent was applied to the existing peak hour traffic volumes to develop year 20 22 background traffic forecasts. This growth rate is generally consistent with historical trends within the study area and future growth projections for Dakota County. Proposed and Adjacent Developments The proposed Cider Ridge development, shown in Figure 3, consists of a 2,060 square foot coffee shop with a drive through and a 5,040 square foot retail space. In addition, the Jardin Spanish Immersion daycare facility, which is 12,000 square feet and expected to accommodate 138 students, has been completed and opened since the initial traffic data collection was completed. Therefore, trips were also generated for the daycare facility. Trip Generation To account for traffic impacts associated with the proposed and adjacent development, a trip generation estimate for the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours, as well as on a weekday daily basis were developed. This trip generation estimate was developed using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, Tenth Edition. Results of the trip generation estimate, shown in Table 3, indicate the proposed Cider Ridge development is expected to generate approximately 174 a.m. peak hour, 102 weekday p.m. peak hour, and 1,760 daily trips to/from the site. Table 3 Trip Generation Estimate Land Use Type (ITE Code) Size Weekday A.M. Peak Hour Trips Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Trips Weekday Daily Trips In Out In Out Proposed Cider Ridge Development Shopping Center (820) 5,040 SF 3 2 10 10 198 Coffee Shop with Drive Through (937) 2,060 SF 86 83 41 41 1,562 Total Proposed Development Site Trips 89 85 51 51 1,760 Pass-By Trip Reductions (89% Coffee, 34% Retail) (-76) (-76) (-40) (-40) (-1,457) Total Proposed Development New Network Trips 13 9 11 11 303 Jardin Center Development Day Care Center (565) 138 Students 57 51 51 58 564 Total New Network Trips 70 60 62 69 867 02114247 January 2021 Proposed Cider Ridge Development Site Plan Figure 3H:\Projects\14000\14247\TraffStudy\Figures\Fig03_Proposed Development Site Plan.cdrCider Ridge Development Traffic Study City of Apple Valley, MN Cider Ridge Development Traffic Study February 11, 2021 Page 7 When accounting for motorists already traveling along Cedar Avenue or 145th Street that will now divert their trip to the proposed Cider Ridge development (i.e. pass-by trips), the net new system impact to the adjacent roadways is expected to be approximately 22 weekday a.m. peak hour, 22 weekday p.m. peak hour, and 303 weekday daily trips. Note that this estimate does not include any multi-use or modal reductions to account for patrons that live or work within walking distance to provide a conservative assessment. The trip generation estimate for the Jardin Center daycare is consistent with the previous study and is expected to generate approximately 108 a.m. peak hour, 109 weekday p.m. peak hour, and 564 daily trips to/from the site. Trips generated by the Cider Ridge and Jardin Center developments were distributed to the study area based on the directional distribution shown in Figure 4, which was developed based on existing travel patterns. The year 2022 build condition traffic forecasts are shown in Figure 5. Intersection Capacity Analysis To determine if the existing roadway network can accommodate year 2022 build conditions, a detailed intersection capacity analysis was completed. Results of the year 2022 build condition intersection capacity analysis shown in Table 4 indicate that all study intersections and proposed access locations are expected to operate at an acceptable overall LOS C or better during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Table 4 Year 2022 Build Intersection Capacity Analysis Intersection A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour LOS (Delay) LOS (Delay) Cedar Avenue / 145th Street B (18 sec.) C (20 sec.) 145th Street / Cider Ridge Access (1) A/A (9 sec.) A/A (9 sec.) (1) Indicates an unsignalized intersection, where the overall LOS is shown followed by the worst side-street approach LOS. The delay shown represents the worst side-street approach delay. During both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours, 95th percentile westbound right-turn queues at the Cedar Avenue and 145th Avenue intersection are expected to increase by 30 feet (i.e. approximately one (1) to two (2) vehicles) to a total of 60 feet, but are still expected to be accommodated within the existing turn lane storage and are not expected to impact operations along 145th Street. The average westbound delays at the Cedar Avenue and 145th Street intersection are expected to increase by approximately nine (9) seconds during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. 95th percentile internal queues for vehicles exiting the proposed development is expected to be approximately two (2) vehicles during the peak periods and are not expected to impact internal site circulation. Note that the 95th percentile queues along 145th Street for vehicles entering the proposed development are expected to be between 30 and 40 feet, or one (1) to two (2) vehicles. This is not expected to significantly impact operations along 145th Street. No mitigation is necessary to accommodate the proposed developments from a roadway capacity perspective. 02114247 January 2021 Directional Distribution Cider Ridge Development Traffic Study City of Apple Valley, MN Figure 4 10%30%40%20% Jardin Center DevelopmentNORTHNorth H:\Projects\14000\14247\TraffStudy\Figures\Fig01_Project Location.cdr145th Street Cedar AvenueROAD23 COUNTY 147th Street Glazier Avenue 02114247 January 2021 2022 Build Conditions Cider Ridge Development Traffic Study City of Apple Valley, MN Figure 5 Jardin Center DevelopmentGlazier Avenue80 (50)10 (5) 145th Street (50) 80 (100) 90 10 (5) 85 (100)Cedar Ridge Access XX (XX) - A.M. Peak Hour Volume - P.M. Peak Hour Volume - Side-Street Stop Control - Signalized Control LEGENDNORTHNorth H:\Projects\14000\14247\TraffStudy\Figures\Fig05_2022 Build Conditions.cdr (85) 120(1395) 1835(40) 60Cedar Avenue100 (220)1025 (2750)75 (75) 145th Street (110) 110 (35) 40 (100) 90 80 (80) 40 (35) 45 (40) 145th Street Cedar AvenueROAD23 COUNTY Glazier Avenue Cider Ridge Development Traffic Study February 11, 2021 Page 10 Public Roadway Systems Impact The daily traffic expected to be generated by the proposed development and the adjacent development is expected to be approximately 2,325 daily trips. Of these 2,325 daily trips, it is assumed that approximately 63 percent of them are already traveling along the public roadway system (i.e. pass -by trips). These pass-by trips were assumed to be traveling along Cedar Avenue and 145th Street. Information in Table 5 details how expected daily trips generated by the proposed development are anticipated to be distributed to area roadways. The following items are noted: • There is expected to be a less than one (1) percent increase in traffic along Cedar Avenue north and south of the proposed/adjacent development sites. • There is expected to be an approximately 8 percent increase in traffic along 145th Street/Glazier Avenue west and south of the proposed/adjacent development sites. Table 5: Public Roadway System Impacts Roadway Segment Existing AADT Estimated AADT Increase Proposed Future AADT Percent Change in AADT Cedar Avenue N of 145th Street 49,000 930 (-585 pass-by) 49,345 0.7% Cedar Avenue S of 145th Street 48,000 700 (-440 pass-by) 48,260 0.5% 145th Street W of Cedar Avenue 3,150 465 (-290 pass-by) 3,325 5.3% Glazier Avenue S of 145th Street 1,000 230 (-145 pass by) 1,085 7.8% Site and Access Review A review of the proposed site plan was completed to identify any issues and recommend potential improvements with regard to sight distance, traffic controls, and circulation. Based on this review, the following issues and mitigation were identified that should be discussed further. A summary of the site plan improvement considerations is illustrated in Figure 6. 1) The internal drive-through configuration may cause driver confusion and queues may result in internal circulation/parking issues. a. Consider relocating the drive-through operations around the building to provide better drive-through vehicle stacking and reduce internal circulation/parking issues and driver confusion. 2) Extend curb and gutter to provide additional space to reduce parking/entrance conflicts. NORTHNorth1) Internal drive-through configuration and queues may cause driver confusion and internal circulation/parking issues. 2) Extend curb and gutter to provide additional space to reduce parking/ entrance conflicts 3) Limit any sight distance impacts from future structures, landscaping, and signing 4) Review turning movements to ensure heavy vehicles have adequate accommodation to maneuver 02114247 January 2021 Site Plan Considerations Figure 6H:\Projects\14000\14247\TraffStudy\Figures\Fig07_Site Plan Considerations.cdrCider Ridge Development Traffic Study City of Apple Valley, MN **Based on the Drive-Through Queue Generation, Counting Cars (2012), the 85th percentile maximum queue is 13 vehicles for coffee shops with drive-through lanes. The site plan shows 12 vehicles, therefore, an additional vehicle was added. ** 1A) Consider relocating the drive-through operations around the building to provide better vehicle staking and reduce potential internal issues Cider Ridge Development Traffic Study February 11, 2021 Page 12 3) Based on field observations, there is adequate sight distance at the proposed 145th Street Access to clearly identify approaching vehicles. Special consideration should be made to limit any sight distance impacts from future structures, landscaping, and signing. 4) Review turning movements to ensure heavy vehicles have adequate accommodations to maneuver. Conclusions and Recommendations The following study conclusions and recommendations are offered for consideration: 1) Study intersections currently operate at an acceptable overall LOS B during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. 2) The proposed Cider Ridge development is expected to generate approximately 174 a.m. peak hour, 102 p.m. peak hour, and 1,760 daily trips to/from the site. a. When accounting for motorists already traveling along Cedar Avenue or 145th Street that will now divert their trip to the adjacent development (i.e. pass -by trips), the net new impact to adjacent roadways is expected to be approximately 22 a.m. peak hour, 22 p.m. peak hour, and 303 daily trips. 3) The adjacent Jardin Center development trip generation is consistent with the previous study and is expected to generate approximately 108 a.m. peak hour, 109 p.m. peak hour, and 564 daily trips to/from the site. 4) All study intersections and proposed access locations are expected to operate at an acce ptable overall LOS C or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours under year 2022 build conditions. a. Westbound right-turning queues at the Cedar Avenue and 145th Street intersection are still expected to be accommodated within the existing turn-lane storage. 5) A review of the proposed site plan was completed to identify any issues and recommend potential improvements regarding access, circulation, and parking. The following improvements offered for consideration are found in the site plan review section. I T E M: 6.A . P L A NNI NG C O MMI S S I O N ME E T I NG D AT E :March 3, 2021 S E C T I O N:L and Use / A ction I tems Description: Z oning Code A mendment to I nstitutional Z oning District - P C 21-01-O S taff Contact: A lex Sharpe, P lanner and E conomic Development Spec. D epartment / Division: C ommunity D evelopment Department AC T I O N RE Q UE S T E D: Recommend amending City Ordinance to allow ancillary retail sales when in conjunction with a permitted use in the P "Institutional" zoning district. S UM M ARY: City staff is bringing forward a text amendment to C ity Code as a request from MacPhail School of Music in partnership with Schmitt Music. Since 2017, MacPhail has operated the Apple Valley location from the C ity's Education Partnership Building, formerly the "Old City Hall". T he site is located west of Largen Park, but is technically on the same parcel of land, which is zoned Institutional. T he Institutional zone is intended for uses which serve the public and those which are quasi-public. Typical uses within this zone are places of worship, parks, schools, the C ommunity Center, and the Municipal C enter. T he public hearing was held on February 3rd. T he Planning C ommission did not make a recommendation on the ordinance due to concerns about ancillary services being prohibited by the draft ordinance. T he C ity Attorney has amended the ordinance to reflect that ancillary services in conjunction with sales are permitted. B AC K G RO UND : Schmitt music, in partnership with MacPhail, is seeking to sell musical instruments and other music related supplies at the Education Partnership Building. Staff has seen a growing demand for ancillary/complimentary retail sales in all non-traditionally retail districts. For example, several years ago the Limited Industrial district was amended to allow ancillary retail of products produced on-site. T he best example of this type of use is Abdallah where the majority of their space is production, but a small chocolate shop is included. T he purpose of the amendment is not to seek retail uses in the Institutional zone, it is to create a public benefit through collaborative partnerships or ancillary sales. Additionally, staff has become aware of a national trend for religious book stores to partner with places of worship to include a small retail bookstore within the campus. T his trend, driven by the rising cost of retail space, has not been sought in Apple Valley to date. Staff is seeking to utilize the opportunity by the MacPhail and Schmitt Music partnership to proactively respond to a growing national trend. Other examples where this ordinance would benefit institutional uses include the C ity's golf course/pro-shop, school stores, and art museums. Staff has worked with the C ity Attorney to ensure any new retail uses do not disrupt the character of the institutional zone, which is often a buffer for residential homes/zones. T he draft amendment requires that the retail sales must be ancillary or complimentary to an existing permitted or conditional use within the zone. T he Zoning Administrator has the authority to determine if a proposed retail use is complimentary to the existing use, and any appeals can be made to the C ity Council prior to a retail user being permitted to operate. T he draft ordinance also proposes the requirement that retail sales to occur in a structure with one or more permitted institutional uses. T his prevents a building within the zone from operating as a solely retail use. T he total permitted retail area of a building cannot exceed 15% of the gross floor area, or 4,500 sq. ft. whichever is less. T his provision prevents a large retail operation and a small institutional use, similar to retail uses in the Limited Industrial zone. In addition to the recommended amendments for retail sales, staff is also recommending a small change to the permitted uses. C urrently the code only permits public museums and art galleries. T his provision is from the original code text completed in the early 1970's. Staff is proposing to allow private museums as a permitted use as not all museums are publicly funded/owned. A prime example is the Walker in Minneapolis, which is privately owned. Staff does not anticipate a large museum like the Walker seeking to locate in Apple Valley in the near future, but smaller more historic museums are possible. B UD G E T I M PAC T: N/A AT TAC HM E NT S: Ordinance CITY OF APPLE VALLEY ORDINANCE NO. ___ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA, AMENDING TITLE XV OF THE CITY CODE ENTITLED "LAND USAGE” BY AMENDING SECTION 155.246 REGARDING RETAIL SALES WITHIN INSTITUTIONAL (P) DISTRICT The City Council of Apple Valley ordains: Section 1. Title XV of the Apple Valley City Code is amended by adding Section 155.246 (O) to read as follows: § 155. 246 PERMITTED USES. Within any P district, no structure or land shall be used, except for one or more of the following principal uses or uses deemed similar by the City Council: * * * * (O) Retail sales of product, goods or materials that are ancillary and complimentary to a use that is a permitted or an approved conditional use on the same property, subject to the following requirements: (1) Retail sales operation is not allowed as an exclusive use within its own stand- alone building; the retail sales shall occur within a building occupied by one or more other institutional uses. (2) The gross floor area of the retail sales operation is not more than 15% of the total gross floor area or 4,500 square feet, whichever is less, of the building in which it occupies. (3) The parking requirements as set forth in this Chapter for the principal use(s) and the retail sales operation on the property are met. (4) Hours of operation are limited to 7:30 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. (5) No sales operations shall occur or otherwise be permitted to occur outdoors notwithstanding any other provision in this Chapter permitting outdoor sales. (6) Notwithstanding any other provision in this Chapter, no signs, banners, posters or other placard shall be placed on any exterior window or door. (7) Retail sale of services is prohibited except as an incidental service for and in conjunction with the products, goods, or materials sold by the retail operator. * * * * 2 Section 2. Title XV of the Apple Valley City Code is amended by revising Section 155.246 (B) to read as follows: § 155.246 PERMITTED USES. Within any P district, no structure or land shall be used, except for one or more of the following principal uses or uses deemed similar by the City Council: * * * * (B) Public libraries and public or private museums art galleries; * * * * Section 3. Filing. A copy of the ordinance shall be filed in the office of the City Clerk. This copy shall be available for inspection by any persons during regular office hours. Section 4. Publication. The City Clerk shall publish the title of this ordinance and the official summary in the official newspaper of the City with notice a printed copy of the ordinance is available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the Office of the City Clerk. Section 5. Effective date. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and the publication of its title and the official summary. PASSED by the City Council this ___ day of ________, 2021. _________________________ Clint Hooppaw, Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________ Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk I T E M: 7.A . P L A NNI NG C O MMI S S I O N ME E T I NG D AT E :March 3, 2021 S E C T I O N:Other B usiness Description: Review of Upcoming Schedule and Other Updates S taff Contact: B reanna Vincent, Department A ssistant D epartment / Division: C ommunity D evelopment Department AC T I O N RE Q UE S T E D: N/A S UM M ARY: Next P lanning Commission Meetings: Wednesday, March 17, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. Public hearing applications due by 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday, February 17, 2021 Site plan, variance applications due by 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday, March 3, 2021 Wednesday, April 7, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. Public hearing applications due by 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday, March 10, 2021 Site plan, variance applications due by 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday, March 24, 2021 Next City C ouncil Meetings: T hursday, March 11, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. T hursday, March 25, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. B AC K G RO UND : N/A B UD G E T I M PAC T: N/A