Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/17/2021 Agenda Packet M eeting L ocation: M unicipal Center 7100 147th Street West Apple Valley, M innesota 55124 Planning Commission meetings have resumed at the Municipal C enter and are open to the public with physical distancing restrictions. Attendee procedures and access information are posted on the C ity's website and include virtual participation opportunities. March 17, 2021 PLA N N IN G C O MMISSIO N T EN TAT IVE A G EN D A 7:00 P M 1.Call to Order A.Planning Commissioners will be attending either in-person or virtually. A roll-call will be taken. 2.Approve Agenda 3.Approve Consent Agenda Items Consent Agenda Items are considered routine and will be enacted with a single motion, without discussion, unless a commissioner or citizen requests to have any item separately considered. It will then be moved to the land use/action items for consideration. A.Approve Minutes of March 3, 2021, Annual Meeting. 4.Public Hearings A.Panera Bread Restaurant - PC21-04-C B 1. C onsider C onditional Use Permit and Site Plan/Building Permit Authorization to Allow for C onstruction of 4,300-sq. ft. Restaurant with Drive-T hrough Window Service and Rapid Pick-up Lane Location: 15200 C edar Avenue Petitioner: Panera Bread, LLC and Brixmor Property Group 5.Land Use / Action Items A.T he Cove - PC20-20-ZSB C onsider a rezoning of three properties from "R-1" (Single family residential) to "P D" (Planned development), preliminary plat to create 17 lots, and site plan review building permit authorization. Location: 13009 Diamond Path Road Petitioner: J MH Land Development, Custom One Homes, Randy and C arolyn Buller 6.Other Business A.Review of Upcoming Schedule and Other Updates Planning Commission - Wednesday, April 7, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. Planning Commission - Wednesday, April 21, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. C ity Council - T hursday, March 25, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. C ity Council - T hursday, April 8, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. 7.Adjourn Regular meetings are broadcast, live, on C harter C ommunications C able C hannel 180 and on the C ity's website at www.cityof applevalley.org I T E M: P L A NNI NG C O MMI S S I O N ME E T I NG D AT E:March 17, 2021 S E C T I O N:Special Notification Description: Planning Commission meetings have resumed at the Municipal Center and are open to the public with physical distancing restrictions. Attendee procedures and access information are posted on the City's website and include virtual participation opportunities. S taff Contact: B reanna Vincent, Department Assistant Department / Division: Community Development Department AC T I O N RE Q UE S T E D: Please let us know you have joined us by either signing at the door or requesting to be an attendee on-line. S UM M ARY: Note: Planning C ommission meetings have resumed at the Municipal C enter and are open to the public with physical distancing restrictions. B AC K G RO UND: N/A B UD G E T I M PAC T: N/A I T E M: 1.A. P L A NNI NG C O MMI S S I O N ME E T I NG D AT E:March 17, 2021 S E C T I O N:Call to Order Description: P lanning Commissioners will be attending either in-person or virtually. A roll-call will be taken. S taff Contact: B reanna Vincent, Department Assistant Department / Division: Community Development Department AC T I O N RE Q UE S T E D: N/A S UM M ARY: During the C O VID-19 Pandemic, the Council C hambers in the Apple Valley Municipal Building has been set-up to allow for the Planning C ommissioners to attend meetings either in-person (observing social distancing in accordance with Emergency Executive Order 20-81) or virtually (via GoToMeeting). A roll-call will be taken. B AC K G RO UND: N/A B UD G E T I M PAC T: N/A I T E M: 3.A. P L A NNI NG C O MMI S S I O N ME E T I NG D AT E:March 17, 2021 S E C T I O N:Consent A genda Description: A pprove Minutes of March 3, 2021, A nnual Meeting. S taff Contact: B reanna Vincent, Department Assistant Department / Division: Community Development Department AC T I O N RE Q UE S T E D: Approve minutes of annual meeting of March 3, 2021. S UM M ARY: T he minutes of the last annual Planning Commission meeting is attached for your review and approval. B AC K G RO UND: State statute requires the creation and preservation of meeting minutes which document the official actions and proceedings of public governing bodies. B UD G E T I M PAC T: N/A AT TAC HM E NT S : Minutes CITY OF APPLE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES March 3, 2021 1. CALL TO ORDER The City of Apple Valley Planning Commission Annual Meeting was called to order by acting Chair Schindler at 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Chair Tom Melander*, Tim Burke*, Keith Deikmann*, Jodi Kurtz, Paul Scanlan, David Schindler, and Philip Mahowald. Member(s) Absent: None City staff members attending: Community Development Director Bruce Nordquist, City Planner Kathy Bodmer, Planner/Meeting Organizer Alex Sharpe, and Department Assistant Breanna Vincent. *Present via remote technology 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Commissioner Schindler asked if there were any changes to the agenda – None. MOTION: Commissioner Mahowald moved, seconded by Commissioner Scanlan, approving the agenda. Roll call vote: Ayes - 7 – Nays - 0. 3. CONSENT ITEMS MOTION: Commissioner Scanlan moved, seconded by Commissioner Kurtz, approving the minutes of the meeting of February 3, 2021. Roll call vote: Ayes – 7 – Nays – 0. 4. ANNUAL BUSINESS MEETING A. Nominate and Approve Officers The Annual Business Meeting is held on the first Planning Commission meeting in March at which appointments for Chair, Vice-Chair and Secretary are made. At the City Council meeting of February 25, 2021, existing members Melander and Mahowald were reappointed. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes March 3, 2021 Page 2 of 5 MOTION: Commissioner Burke moved, seconded by Chair Melander, appointing Tom Melander as Chair. Roll call vote: Ayes – 7 – Nays – 0. MOTION: Commissioner Scanlan moved, seconded by Commissioner Kurtz, appointing Tim Burke for Vice-Chair. Roll call vote: Ayes – 7 – Nays – 0. MOTION: Commissioner Burke moved, seconded by Commissioner Scanlan, appointing David Schindler for Secretary. Roll call vote: Ayes – 7 – Nays – 0. B. Approve 2020 Planning Commission Annual Report Community Development Director Nordquist provided a brief presentation showcasing the Top 10 Projects for 2020 of the Planning Commission. MOTION: Commissioner Burke moved, seconded by Commissioner Scanlan, approving the 2020 Annual Report. Roll call vote: Ayes – 7 – Nays – 0. 5. PUBLIC HEARING A. Cider Ridge Marketplace/Hope Alliance 2nd Addition Planner Kathy Bodmer presented the staff report. Commissioner Schindler asked if there are any questions from the Commissioners. Commissioner Burke asked what the response was from the Petitioner when the recommendation to route drive-thru traffic around the back of the building instead. Planner Bodmer stated there is a concern with the pipeline easement and accommodating the drive-thru. Commissioner Scanlan stated concerns about the drive-thru backup causing issues in the parking lot and would prefer to see other options for the drive-thru. Commissioner Schindler expressed concerns about traffic exiting the drive-thru lane would cross paths with those entering the drive-thru lane and he requested to CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes March 3, 2021 Page 3 of 5 see what it may look like if the drive-thru were relocated to the north side of building instead and how that may allow for more stacking. Planner Bodmer stated the building would need to shift. Commissioner Kurtz seconded Commissioner Schindler’s point. She asked about hours of operation and how that might coincide with the Church’s hours. Commissioner Burke asked why the drive-thru is being moved to the south side and whether it is replacing the bank drive-thru originally proposed. Planner Bodmer stated that would be a good question for the Petitioner. She advised that it does create more space between the drive-thru and the neighborhood. Chair Melander stated the new proposal was not in line with the original proposal for allowing a low-impact drive-thru. Petitioner Ben Krsnak with Hempel Companies presented a brief presentation. Commissioner Kurtz asked what would fill the location in the event that the coffee shop does not work out in that location. Petitioner Krsnak stated that a coffee shop/bakery has always been permitted in that location though a Class 2 restaurant such as fast food would not be permitted. Community Development Director Nordquist asked what the retail space next to the coffee shop would become or if there were any ideas for what would fill the space. Petitioner Krsnak stated the design of the building allows for multiple tenants to occupy the retail space. He advised businesses such as salons, dental offices, etc. could be possible users of the space. He also stated space along Cedar Avenue is a very desirable location for many small businesses. Commissioner Scanlan expressed concerns about the stacking of cars and increased traffic to the area. Commissioner Burke asked whether the consideration of the increase in drive- thru/pickup orders in the last year has been made. Petitioner Krsnak stated a drive-thru is more desirable especially for those with small children and elderly or disabled people. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes March 3, 2021 Page 4 of 5 Pastor Tim Bubna of Hope Church spoke in support of the proposal of the drive- thru coffee shop. Joshua Benjamin of the Hope Church Leadership Group also spoke in support of the proposal. Hearing no further comments, Commissioner Schindler closed the public hearing. 6. LAND USE / ACTION ITEMS A. Zoning Code Amendment to Institutional Zoning District Planner Alex Sharpe presented the staff report. Commissioner Schindler asked if there were any questions from the Commissioners – None. MOTION: Commissioner Burke moved, seconded by Commissioner Scanlan, approving the amendment to allow ancillary retail sales in conjunction with a permitted use in the P “Institutional” zoning district. Roll call vote: Ayes - 7 – Nays - 0. 7. OTHER BUSINESS A. Review of Upcoming Schedule and Other Updates The next Planning Commission meeting is Wednesday, March 17, 2021, 7:00 p.m. The next City Council meeting is Thursday, March 11, 2020, 7:00 p.m. 8. ADJOURNMENT Hearing no further comments from the Planning Staff or Planning Commission, Commissioner Schindler asked for a motion to adjourn. MOTION: Commissioner Burke moved, seconded by Commissioner Diekmann, to adjourn the meeting at 8:22 p.m. Roll call vote: Ayes – 7 – Nays – 0. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes March 3, 2021 Page 5 of 5 Respectfully submitted, ______________________________________ Breanna Vincent, Planning Department Assistant Approved by the Apple Valley Planning Commission on 3/17/2021 . Thomas O. Melander, Chair I T E M: 4.A. P L A NNI NG C O MMI S S I O N ME E T I NG D AT E:March 17, 2021 S E C T I O N:P ublic Hearings Description: P anera B read Restaurant - P C21-04-C B S taff Contact: Thomas L ovelace, City Planner Department / Division: Community Development Department Applicant: P anera B read, L L C and B rixmor Property Group P roject Number: P C21-04-C B Applicant Date: 2/3/2021 60 Days: 4/3/2021 120 Days: 6/2/2021 AC T I O N RE Q UE S T E D: Open the public hearing, receive comments and close the public hearing. It is the policy of the Planning C ommission not to act on an item the night of its public hearing. T his request is similar to a proposal that was reviewed by the C ommission in 2018/2019. At that time, the C ommission voted to recommend approval of a conditional use permit and site plan/building permit authorization to allow for a Panera Bread restaurant with drive-through window service. However, before staff makes a recommendation to the C ommission, the applicant shall provide revised site and landscape plans, and building elevations that incorporate staff's comments. S UM M ARY: Panera Bread, LLC and Brixmor Property Group are requesting approval of of a conditional use permit and site plan/building permit authorization to allow for construction of a 4,300-sq. ft. C lass I restaurant with drive-through window and rapid pick-up lane service on an existing 1.28-acre lot. T he site is located at 15200 Cedar Avenue, in the Southport C entre retail development and is the current location of the Baker's Square restaurant. T he site is located in zone 2 of Planned Development N o. 244, which allows for C lass I and II restaurants as permitted uses and drive-through window service in conjunction with a C lass I and II restaurant as a conditional use. T he applicant is requesting approval of a conditional use to allow for drive-through window service in conjunction with a Class I restaurant. T his request will include one lane that will allow the customer to order from a menu board and pick up their order at the drive-up window, and a second lane, called a rapid pick-up (RPU) lane that allows a customer to order by means other than from an on-site menu board and pick up their order at the drive-up window. T he RP U lane is an addition from what was approved in 2019. T he second part of the request involves the demolition of the existing 5,738-sq. ft. Baker's Square restaurant and construction of a 4,300-sq. ft. restaurant. B AC K G RO UND: In 2018, a planned development ordinance amendment, conditional use permit and site plan/building permit authorization for the subject property. T he request included: 1. An ordinance amendment to allow drive-through window in conjunction with a C lass I restaurant in Planned Development No. 244/zone 2 2. A conditional use permit to allow for drive-through window service in conjunction with a Panera Bread Restaurant, located at 15200 C edar Avenue. 3. Site plan/building permit authorization to allow for construction of a 4,820-sq. ft. restaurant with drive-through window service on a 1.28-acre lot. T he three requests were recommended for approval by Planning C ommission on J anuary 9, 2019, and was approved by the C ity C ouncil on J anuary 24, 2019 (copies of the approved plans are attached f or reference). Improvements to the site consistent with the site plan/building permit and conditional use permit resolutions were never completed, therefore the approvals became null and void. T he new request is asking for the following: 1. A conditional use permit to allow for drive-through window service and rapid pick-up lane (RPU) in conjunction with a Panera Restaurant. 2. Site plan/building permit authorization to allow for construction of a 4,300-sq. ft. restaurant with drive-through window service on a 1.28-acre lot. Comprehensiv e P lan: T he subject property is currently designated "C " (Commercial) on the 2040 C omprehensive Plan Land Use Map. T he commercial designation includes a wide variety of retail, office, and service uses that vary in intensity and off-site impacts. T he City uses the zoning ordinance to regulate the intensity and characteristics of development based upon land use criteria and performance standards. Examples of limitations to development include required parking, building setbacks, infiltration, site access and lot coverage. Retail uses typically encompass the traditional community shopping businesses and occupy much of the downtown area. T his specific commercial land use is intended to accommodate a wide range of commercial goods and services. O ff-site impacts include activity, light, noise and generally higher traffic generation rates than other commercial uses. Residential developments are not allowed within this land use category except for those planned in conjunction with a planned development or within the upper floors of multi-level buildings as a conditional use to ensure that impacts are mitigated. Retail land uses will be zoned "RB" (Retail Business), "SC " (Regional Shopping C enter), and "PD" (Planned Development), which allows uses according to the specific performance standards: High quality site and architectural design and building materials are expected to be used within this land use category to promote pleasing off-site views of the development; Development in the downtown area shall adhere to the Downtown Design Guidelines; Landscaping shall be installed to provide aesthetic treatment of buildings and to soften parking lot areas; Significant traffic generation during the weekday and weekends is associated with retail development. Traffic studies may be requested in conjunction with the review of large developments that have the potential to threaten the integrity of the existing and planned roadway system. Additionally, developments that lower the level of service on adjacent roadways or intersections may be required to install traffic improvements to improve the level of service to its pre-development condition if C ity approval is granted. Driveway access points to the development shall be from non-local streets or those designed for primarily non-residential traffic. No direct access to County Road #42 and Cedar Avenue shall be allowed; and Lighting is limited to parking lot and building illumination designed for employee safety. Zoning: T he site is located in zone 2 of "PD -244" (Planned D evelopment). T he purpose of this planned development zone is to provide a mix of shopping center, freestanding retail and limited business uses, including restaurants. T he proposed restaurant is classified as a C lass I C asual Restaurant, which is a permitted use. Prior to 2019, drive-through window service was not a permitted, conditional, or accessory use in this planned development except as part of a C lass II (fast-food) restaurant. In 2018, the applicant submitted a request for an amendment to the planned development ordinance to allow drive-through window service in conjunction with a C lass I restaurant as a conditional use in zone 2. On J anuary 9, 2019, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed ordinance amendment and on J anuary 24, 2019, the C ity C ouncil passed an ordinance allowing drive-through window service in conjunction with a Class I restaurant in "PD-244/zone 2 subject to the following conditions: 1. T he C lass I restaurant shall be a freestanding building. 2. Only one C lass I restaurant with drive-through window service shall be allowed. 3. All signage associated with the drive-through window service shall adhere to C hapter 154 of the Apple Valley C ode of Ordinances. Conditional Use P ermit: T he applicant is requesting approval of a conditional use permit (C .U.P.) to allow for drive-through window service that will include a lane for ordering from a menu board and pickup at a window similar to what was approved in 2019. A nother aspect to this C .U.P. request is the addition of a second lane that allows a customer to order by means other than a fixed on-site menu board and pickup the order at the drive-up window. T his is a relatively new service that allows customers to order and pre-pay online and pickup at a designated time. T he submitted plans show that 8-10 vehicles will be able to stack up in each lane. T he city code requires a minimum of six stacking spaces for each drive-up window. Site P lan: T he site is currently occupied by 5,738-sq. ft. restaurant and 72 parking spaces on 1.28 acres. T he applicant will be removing the existing structure, curb and gutter directly adjacent and to the east of the building, pavement, concrete sidewalks, surface parking spaces and landscaping in preparation for the construction of the new restaurant. In 2019, the C ity approved site plan/building permit authorization to allow for 4,820-sq. ft. building on the 1.28-acre site, as well as 23 new parking spaces, one 12-foot wide drive lane, and trash enclosure. Infiltration basins were to be constructed along the east, north and west side of the property, along with 48 existing parking spaces in addition to the 23 new spaces, that would provide parking for the restaurant. T he approved plans showed an outdoor seating area located at the southwest corner of the site. Decorative fencing would be installed on the west and south side of the seating area, which would provide barrier between diners and vehicles exiting the drive-through lane. T he applicant is now proposing to construct a 4,300-sq. ft. restaurant, two 12-foot wide drive-through window lanes on the east and north side that will morph into one lane along the west side of the building. Eight new parking spaces will be added and an infiltration basin will be constructed along the west side of the property. T he applicant will make a connection from the drive-up lanes and west parking drive aisle will provide an drive-through window service escape lane. Direct vehicular access to the site's 55 parking spaces will be via an existing driveway that is connected to a private drive in the Southport C entre development. An existing cross access and parking easement with the property to the south will provide an additional point of access and parking for the restaurant. T he site plan shows a 15-ft. x 63-ft concrete sidewalk in front of the building. Although it is not labeled, staff is presuming that area will be the location of their outdoor dining area. T herefore, the area should be shown on the plans and information should be submitted on what type of barrier will be erected around the area. T he trash enclosure will be located in the northeast corner of the site. An 18-foot drive aisle will provide access to the trash enclosure. Parking lots with fifteen (15) or more parking spaces shall provide for parking for bicycles adjacent to the front of the building at a location that will not impede use of any sidewalk. T he applicant shall be required to install a bike rack in front of building. T he applicant has also submitted emergency vehicle and delivery vehicle circulation plans, which have been reviewed by staff. No issues were identified with the circulation patterns as proposed. Grading P lan: Minimal grading will be necessary to prepare the site for the new building. T he C ity Engineer has reviewed the grading plan and his comments are contained in his attached memo. Issuance of a natural resources management permit and building permit shall be subject to the submittal of a final grading, drainage, and erosion control plan that shall be reviewed and approved by the C ity Engineer. Av ailability of Municipal Utilities: T he City Engineer has reviewed the utility plans and his comments are contained in his attached memo. T he applicant shall submit revised plans for staff review prior to any recommendation. Final utility plans shall be submitted for review and approval by the C ity Engineer prior to issuance of a of a natural resources management permit and building permit. Elev ation Drawings: T he elevation plans indicate an exterior finish that will include a combination of brick and EIFS. Other features include aluminum canopies above the building entrance, rear service door, and drive-up window. A vertically ribbed metal material will be installed at the main entrance and drive-up window. T he city code requires that all commercial buildings shall have a vertical exposed exterior finish of 100% non-combustible, non-degradable and maintenance-free construction materials (such as face brick or natural stone but excluding such such construction materials as sheet or corrugated aluminum, iron or concrete block of any kind or similar). T herefore, the ribbed material should be removed and replaced with brick at the entrance and drive-up window similar to what was shown at the entrance on the plans approved in 2019. T he applicant has provided elevations for the trash enclosure, which show a brick finish and a grey composite wood gate and service entrance. T he enclosure's exterior finish is in conformance with code. T he applicant has not identified the location of the building's mechanical equipment. All mechanical equipment shall be screened in accordance with section 155.346(B)(3)(a)(b) of the zoning ordinance. Landscape P lan: T he landscape plan identifies a variety of plantings around the perimeter of the building and trash enclosure. T he Natural Resources C oordinator has reviewed the proposed landscape plans and her comments are included in the C ity Engineer's attached memo. Revisions should be made and submitted for review by City staff prior to any recommendation. City code requires that the minimum cost of landscaping materials (live plant materials, excluding sod) for commercial projects shall be 2.5% of the estimated building construction cost based on the Means construction data. Street Classifications/Accesses/Circulation: T he property is located adjacent to C edar Avenue to the west, and private drives to the north and east. No access shall be allowed from C edar Avenue. T he site plan shows that direct access will be from the private drive located to east of the site. A cross access/parking easement between this property and the lot to the south will provide additional access to the site. P edestrian Access: T he applicant is showing a sidewalk connection from the site to the sidewalk along C edar Avenue. S i g ns : T he building elevation plan identifies several signs and the site plan shows the locations of directional signage and drive-through window service menu boards. Approval of any signage is not part of this request. All signage shall conform to the regulations set forth in the planned development ordinance and Chapter 154 of the city code. P ublic Hearing Comments: T he public hearing should be opened, comments taken and the hearing closed. It is the policy of the Planning C ommission not to act on the night of the public hearing. B UD G E T I M PAC T: N/A AT TAC HM E NT S : Memo L ocation Map Comp Plan Map Z oning Map Plan S et Elevations Plan S et CITY OF MEMO Public Works TO: Tom Lovelace, Planner FROM: Brandon S. Anderson, PE, City Engineer DATE: March 11, 2021 SUBJECT: Panera Preliminary Plan Review per plans dated February 2nd, 2021 General 1. All work and infrastructure within public easements or right of way shall be to City standards. 2. Provide a narrative and site plan showing how the expansion will be constructed and any impacts prior to building permit authorization. The narrative and plan shall include the following: a. Material storage and staging i. All material storage to be onsite and indicated on plan. b. Haul routes to and from the site. c. Contractor and subcontractor parking locations i. Onsite trade parking should be provided. 3. No construction work shall begin prior to a preconstruction meeting conference with a Public works and a Building Inspections representative. 4. Public Work Department (952-953-2400) shall be notified a minimum of 48 hours for any required water main shut downs and/or connections. 5. City of Apple Valley Water Department shall operate all valves on public owned mains and valves connecting private lines to public owned mains. 6. The following City Detail Plates have recently been updated and need to be included in the plans: SER-6, SAN-2, SER-3, STO-65, and STO-7. Permits 7. A Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit is required for any project that disturbs more than one acre. Provide a copy of the executed permit prior to construction. 8. A City of Apple Valley Natural Resource Management Permit (NRMP) will be required prior to any land disturbing activity. 9. A Dakota County Right-of-Way permit will be required for work within the Cedar Avenue right-of-way. Provide a copy of the executed permit prior to construction. 10. Provide a copy of the approval letter from the Department of Labor and Industry (DOLI) prior to construction. 11. Provide a copy of any other required permits. Site 12. Final site plan shall be reviewed with the construction plans and approved by City Engineer. 13. The location of the monument sign is in the easement. No structures are allowed within drainage and utility easements. Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control 14. Provide overall site composite Curve Number (CN) on the plans. 15. The finished floor/low opening elevation must be 3’ minimum above the 100-year high water level. 16. Show all emergency over flow (EOF) elevations and routing. The finished floor/low opening elevation must be 1’ minimum above the EOF elevation. EOF route should be clearly identified on the plans. 17. The slope on the sidewalk that connects to Cedar Avenue cannot exceed 5.0%. 18. Proposed infiltration basin and associated rain guardian inlet device shall be privately owned and maintained. An infiltration basin Construction and Maintenance Agreement will be required as part of Development Agreement. 19. Proposed Underground Stormwater System shall be privately owned and maintained. An Underground Stormwater System Construction and Maintenance Agreement will be required as part of Development Agreement. 20. Provide a cross section for the Infiltration basin, include type and depth of filter media. 21. A portion of the storm water generated on site is bypassing the treatment by flowing to the existing catch basin on the south and should be regraded to direct impervious surface to treatment areas. 22. Final grading, drainage, and erosion control plan shall be reviewed with the construction plans and approved by City Engineer. Sanitary Sewer 23. The existing sanitary sewer service should be identified on the plans and shown as removed. The existing wye shall be capped as part of the removal. 24. Indicate the existing sanitary sewer pipe size and material at the connection point. 25. Confirm that the proposed sanitary sewer pipe grade meets the requirements specified in the Minnesota Plumbing Code. 26. Final sanitary sewer design shall be reviewed with the construction plans and approved by City Engineer. Water main 27. Apple Valley standard is 8’ minimum cover for all public water main, please revise General Utility Notes. 28. Domestic water and fire service shall be split outside the existing building and the valves shall be located 1.5 times the height of the building away from the building or placed in location readily accessible per City of Apple Valley standard detail plate SER-6. 29. The existing water service should be identified on the plans and shown as removed back to the main. 30. Final water main design shall be reviewed with the construction plans and approved by City Engineer. Storm Sewer 31. Confirm that the existing catch basin near the south side of the site is adequately sized to allow for an additional 12” HDPE pipe connection at the proposed angle. 32. The existing storm sewer that is shown as being connected to is privately owned. An agreement between the property owners will need to be provided prior to the storm sewer connection. 33. Provide pretreatment device/s, such as a SAFL Baffle or approved equal and sump prior to discharging into the public storm sewer in an additional separate MH. Sump structures as shown in City “Catch Basin Manhole with Sump” detail STO-5S. Any sumps shall be privately maintained and routinely cleaned as the accumulated sediment will be from the private parking lots and roadways. EX-STRM-100 should be replaced with a new sump structure. 34. Provide storm water calculations and storm water management plan for review and approval by the City Engineer. 35. Final storm sewer design shall be reviewed with the construction plans and approved by City Engineer. Landscape and Natural Resources 36. Project Drainage Report and plan set indicates site drains to Lac Lavon. Despite its proximity, the site does not drain to Lac Lavon, rather East Lake in Lakeville. 37. All existing ash trees at this property are infested with Emerald Ash Borer and shall be removed by the property owner in March 2021 under the City’s Shade Tree Management regulations. a. The proposed landscape plan shows several of these ash trees as “Existing trees” with new plants surrounding them. The landscape plan shall be revised to incorporate additional trees in the islands to meet landscaping requirements. 38. The existing trees planted along Cedar Avenue shall remain and be protected throughout construction. 39. Tree planting is prohibited in public drainage and utility easements. Drainage and utility easements shall be clearly identified on landscape plan. 40. The proposed plant schedule is heavy on daylilies (36% of the schedule). The City encourages decreasing the daylily quantity and planting more of the other native species in the schedule a. Incorporation of additional native plants into the planting plan in place of cultivars and native cultivars will have additional water quality and pollinator habitat benefits. BX3 PX MP2 BX2 PRX G1 G1 MP1 19' - 0"20' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"PX BX2 G2 G3 PRX BX2 CPXCPX 19' - 0"MP1 20' - 0"BX3 EXTERIOR MATERIALS: MASONRY BAND G1 ALUM. STOREFRONT CURTAINWALL, COLOR: CLEAR ANODIZED, CLEAR GLAZING BX3 MP1 PREFABRICATED ALLUMINUM CANOPY CPX COPING: PRE-FINISHED, COLOR: DARK BRONZE BX2 HORIZONTAL STACKED BRICK COLOR: BROWN / RUST EIFS, FINE SAND FINISH. COLOR: DRYVIT, TBDPX G2 ALUM. STOREFRONT, COLOR: CLEAR ANODIZED, CLEAR GLAZING G3 ALUM. STOREFRONT, COLOR: CLEAR ANODIZED, SPANDREL GLAZING MP2 METAL PANEL, DARK BRONZE PREFABRICATED RIBBED MATERAIL, COLOR: GREENPRX JUSTIN K. ALLISON M.CHARLES T. Project Title: Professional Seal: Project Team: Consultant Copyright Placeholder Project Number: Drawn By: Issue Date: Sheet Number: DPM:DM:CPM:Bakery CafeBakery-Cafe: SYSTEM: G4 (ARIA)2/26/2021 3:28:34 PMO200 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 21-0219 Author 15200 CEDAR AVENUEAPPLE VALLEY, MN 55124#1306210036PERMIT / BID SET#1306 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 FRONT ELEVATION- SOUTH 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 SIDE ELEVATION - EAST No.Description Date PX CPX BX3 BX2 G3G3 PRX 19' - 0"20' - 0"BX2 PX CPX PRX G2 BX3 G2 MP1 19' - 0"20' - 0"BX2 BX3 CPX PANERA WALL GRAPHICS PX EXTERIOR MATERIALS: MASONRY BAND G1 ALUM. STOREFRONT CURTAINWALL, COLOR: CLEAR ANODIZED, CLEAR GLAZING BX3 MP1 PREFABRICATED ALLUMINUM CANOPY CPX COPING: PRE-FINISHED, COLOR: DARK BRONZE BX2 HORIZONTAL STACKED BRICK COLOR: BROWN / RUST EIFS, FINE SAND FINISH. COLOR: DRYVIT, TBDPX G2 ALUM. STOREFRONT, COLOR: CLEAR ANODIZED, CLEAR GLAZING G3 ALUM. STOREFRONT, COLOR: CLEAR ANODIZED, SPANDREL GLAZING MP2 METAL PANEL, DARK BRONZE PREFABRICATED RIBBED MATERAIL, COLOR: GREENPRX JUSTIN K. ALLISON M. CHARLES T. Project Title: Professional Seal: Project Team: Consultant Copyright Placeholder Project Number: Drawn By: Issue Date: Sheet Number: DPM: DM: CPM:Bakery CafeBakery-Cafe: SYSTEM: G4 (ARIA)2/26/2021 3:29:17 PMO201 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 21-0219 Author 15200 CEDAR AVENUEAPPLE VALLEY, MN 55124#1306210036PERMIT / BID SET#1306 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 REAR ELEVATION- NORTH 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 DT ELEVATION - WEST No.Description Date I T E M: 5.A. P L A NNI NG C O MMI S S I O N ME E T I NG D AT E:March 17, 2021 S E C T I O N:L and Use / Action I tems Description: The Cove - P C20-20-Z S B S taff Contact: K athy Bodmer, A I C P, Planner Department / Division: Community Development Department Applicant: J MH L and Development, Custom One Homes, and Randy and Carolyn B uller P roject Number: P C20-20-Z S C B Applicant Date: 11/6/2020 60 Days: 1/5/2021 120 Days: 3/6/2021 AC T I O N RE Q UE S T E D: Suggested motions are provided for the Planning C ommission to recommend denial or approval of the development. To Recommend Denial: If the Planning C ommission finds that T he C ove development project, consisting of 17 detached v illa townhomes, should be denied, then it should recommend denial of the requested rezoning, subdivision, and site plan review/building permit authorization stating the reasons for recommending denial. Minutes from the Planning Commission's December 16, 2020, Public Hearing and February 3, 2021, meeting, are attached for reference. To Recommend Approv al : To recommend approval of T he C ove development, consisting o f 17 detached v illa townhomes, staff is recommending that the motions contain the conditions suggested below: 1. Recommend approval of the rezoning of the property from “R-1” (Single family residential, 40,000 sq. ft. min. lot) to “PD” (Planned Development) subject to the following conditions: 1. T he Planned D evelopment requirements shall be in accordance with the draft PD ordinance outline, subject to developer and C ity Attorney refinements and C ity C ouncil final approval 2. T he developer shall execute a Planned Development Agreement. 3. Development plans shall comply fully with the most up-to-date version of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources “SH” (Shoreland Overlay) zoning district requirements. 4. Outlots A and D shall be maintained by the homeowner ’s association as Shoreland and Bluff Protective Buffer zones, subject to the terms executed in the PD Agreement. 5. Buildings shall be single story townhomes. 6. T he exterior of the buildings shall be constructed with an exterior of non-combustible, non-degradable and maintenance-free construction material (such as brick, natural stone or cultured stone) or a high quality composite siding material such as cementitious fiberboard, LP Smart siding, or similar. 2. Recommend approval of the subdivision by preliminary plat of T he C ove, creating 17 detached villa townhome lots and 4 outlots, subject to the following: 1. Subdivision by preliminary plat is subject to approval of the rezoning to PD and execution of a PD Agreement. 2. Park dedication shall be a cash-in-lieu of land dedication. 3. An escrow shall be dedicated for the future construction of an 8’ wide bituminous trail along Diamond Path as it abuts the subdivision. 4. Drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated over the ponding/infiltration basins. 5. An infiltration basin construction and maintenance agreement shall be executed for the long-term maintenance of the infiltration basin areas. 6. T he developer shall install and maintain buffers to protect Farquar Lake and the wetland as stated in the C ity Engineer's J anuary 15, 2021, memo. 3. Recommend approval of the Site Plan Review/Building Permit Authorization for construction of 17 detached villa townhomes, subject to: 1. Site Plan/Building Permit is subject to approval of the rezoning of the property to PD and subdivision by preliminary plat of T he Cove. 2. A wetland delineation was approved on 7/9/2020 on the site. T he applicant must address any proposed wetland impacts, such as the proposed raingarden outlet, through the appropriate WC A application – no loss, de minimus, etc. if necessary. 3. Developer shall comply with all requirements outlined in C ity Engineer’s J anuary 15, 2021, memo. 4. Developer shall submit nursery bid list that confirms that the value of the landscape plantings meets or exceeds 2.5% of the value of the construction of the buildings based on Means Construction Data. 5. No site work or tree removal may begin until the developer has obtained a Natural Resources Management Permit (N RMP) and all required site protection measures have been installed and inspected by the C ity. 6. No site work or tree removal may begin until the developer obtains all required State N PD ES permits. 7. No demolition may take place until the developer obtains a demolition permit from the City. S UM M ARY: T he petitioners submitted an application to develop the three Buller properties totaling 8.12 acres on the northeast side of Farquar Lake, for 17 detached villa townhomes. T he existing parcels include two vacant properties and one large-lot single-family property addressed as 13009 Diamond Path. T he requested action would be a rezoning, subdivision by preliminary plat, and site plan review/building permit authorization. T he 17 detached villa townhomes are clustered together and placed closer to Diamond Path to create a natural vegetative buffer area and common open space between the townhomes and the lake. T he townhome association would have one beach access, shared dock, and outdoor recreation/play area, which would be available to the townhome owners to share. A revised preliminary plat drawing shows a reconfiguration of the outlots so that the common area can be clearly defined from the common ownership open space. T he plans have been further modified reducing the distance between the sand beach and the dock area. During construction, 69.6% of the critical shore impact zone (SIZ) will remain undisturbed. Upon completion of the project, 94.6% of the S IZ area will remain as a natural protected area. T he proposed development is served by a 28' wide private street with one drive access out to Diamond Path. T he width of the private street will allow for parking on one side of the street. T he development site is located within the shoreland overlay zoning district for Farquar Lake which is designated by the D N R as a "Recreational Development" lake. It is also currently listed as an "Impaired Water" according to the Minnesota Pollution C ontrol Agency (MPC A) due to excess nutrients. 15-Lot Alternative Plan - T he petitioners provided a revised plan that removes two of the units on the north and south ends of the development. T his allows the developer to remove retaining walls on the the two ends of the site, remove the hammerhead on the south side of the site, shorten the shared private street, terminate the private street with two cul-de-sacs, and provide clustering and grouping of the buildings. T he plan reduces impervious surface area from 24.3% to 22.9%, provides additional room for snow storage, and provides additional "protective buffering" area. However, inserting a cul-de-sac on the south side of the site pushes two of the units up to the 75' setback from the ordinary high water level. While the plan shows good progress, the Planning Commission may find that the revised plan does not go far enough to address the building massing concerns discussed by the Planning Commission at the December 16, 2020, and February 3, 2021, meetings. Removing two more units, creating home clusters of two and three units, may provide relief and massing that would provide the most "context sensitive" design solution for the site. T he Planning Commission will take official action on the 17-lot original development plan. However, if the Planning C ommission would like to support the 15-lot layout, it may recommend approval of the 15-lot layout, subject to the conditions stated for the 17 lots. B AC K G RO UND: P ublic Hearing: T he Public Hearing for this item was held at the December 16, 2020, Planning C ommission meeting. A number of questions and concerns were raised which are addressed in the attached staff background report. T he comments fell under the following topic areas: Farquar Lake and surrounding neighborhood characteristics. City review methodology. Site design and operation questions. Natural resources protection. Neighborhood expressed impacts. Stormwater filtration requirements for "PD" zoning districts in SH zones. Zoning: T he property is currently zoned “R-1” (Single-family residential, 40,000 sq. ft. min. lot) and is located within the “SH” (Shoreland Overlay) zoning district. T he petitioners request a rezoning of the property from R-1 to “PD” (Planned Development). T he plan shows the property would be developed in a townhome layout where the detached villa townhomes are grouped together along the private street, and then an outlot, owned in common by the homeowners, would be created between the townhomes and the lake; the common ownership lot would serve as a landscaped buffer and provide storm water management infiltration between the townhomes and the lake. Since the petitioners are requesting a P D zoning designation, the C ity will require that the development meet the most up-to-date standards of the D N R's "SH" (Shoreland Overlay) zoning district standards. Second, a rezoning to P D allows the C ity to place reasonable conditions on the development to protect the shoreland area. Conditions of approval of the PD may include dedications of conservation easements, submission of homeowner association incorporation documents to ensure compliance with the S H standards, limiting the number of motor boats, and other reasonable conditions to offset potential impacts for the PD development. Staff would like to discuss conditions of the PD zoning ordinance with the Planning C ommission. Subdiv ision by P reliminary P lat: T he three existing parcels would be subdivided to create 17 detached townhome lots and three common-ownership outlots. Ten feet (10') additional right-of-way is dedicated for Diamond Path. Dakota C ounty has reviewed the preliminary plat in accordance with the Dakota C ounty’s C ontiguous Plat Ordinance. T he County review letter indicates that the proposed access point may be converted to a right-in/right-out access in the future if a center median is constructed in this area. T he future design of Diamond Path will be determined by a study with options including a two-lane with center median or three-lane design in this area. T he access point shown is preferred because it is a natural high point for the site adjacent to Diamond Path. Site P lan: T he site plan shows that the site will be developed with small lot detached villa townhome parcels which will allow the petitioners to cluster the home sites together to create larger common ownership parcels. Separating the home sites from the lakeshore limits the lake access to one shared access point. T he petitioner states that they plan to plant the shared vegetative buffer area with natural vegetation such as prairie grasses and trees which will help provide additional filtering and visual screening over time between the townhomes and the lake, the storm water infiltration basins and the delineated wetland. T he plans show that Outlot A , the outlot between the townhomes and the lake, would be designated as a Shoreland Protection Zone which would be a natural buffer area. T he revised preliminary plat provides a delineation between the natural area and the community gathering, beach and dock area. Staff anticipates that the dock area is likely to have typical sod and a maintained park-like lawn area. T he homeowner association amenity area now contains a clear edge that defines the limits of the beach to ensure it doesn't grow over time. T he proposed private street accesses Diamond Path and is 28’ wide which will allow parking on one side of the street. T he private street terminates in a cul-de-sac and hammerhead turn- around. T he Fire Department is concerned that the hammerhead does not currently meet the City’s standards. T he detached townhomes will help to buffer the view of D iamond Path from Farquar Lake. Natural Resources: T he site is located within the “SH” (Shoreland Overlay) zoning district of Farquar Lake. In addition, a wetland has been delineated on the site. Any work around the wetland will be required to conform to the State’s Wetland Conservation Act rules. T he site is also heavily wooded with varied terrain. Farquar Lake is currently listed as an “Impaired Water” according to the Minnesota Pollution C ontrol Agency (MPC A ) due to excess nutrients. Stormwater treatment and management will be an important concern related to this project. Buffers are required adjacent to wetlands and the lake shore. T he petitioner plans to provide buffering through Outlot A. T he Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (D N R) reviewed the development plans and provided a letter in response. T he D N R notes that a planned development is able to provide additional buffering and restrict lake access in a way that a single-family subdivision could not. Grading and Tree Remov al P lans: T he majority of the site will be graded to make the site suitable for development. T he grading plan shows that an infiltration basin will be created between the townhomes and the lake to provide pretreatment of storm water before it enters the lake. A total of the total 7,064 caliper inches of significant trees are located on the site. T he development will remove 5,292 caliper inches. A total of 10% of the removed caliper inches, or 212 - 2.5" caliper trees, must replace the removed caliper inches. P rev ious rev iew by City: In 2017, the property owner submitted a plan to subdivide the property to create seven single-family lots. T he plans contained outstanding issues and never moved forward, but appeared to meet the requirements of the existing zoning district. Seven (7) detached single-family lots abutting the lake would have been entitled to fully developed yards, individual beaches and docks in accordance with D N R and City ordinances. Attachments: Multiple pages of correspondence have been received from neighboring residents. T hey were attached to the public hearing staff report and are available upon request. B UD G E T I M PAC T: N/A AT TAC HM E NT S : Background Material Map Site P lan Ordinance Plan S et Plan S et Plan S et Plan S et Memo Memo Memo Background Material Minutes Minutes 1 THE COVE PROJECT REVIEW Existing Conditions Property Location: Generally, northwest of intersection of Diamond Path (CSAH 33) and Evermoor Parkway. One of the three parcels addressed as 13009 Diamond Path Legal Description: Parcel 1: All that part of Government Lot 1, Section 24, Township 115, Range 20, described as follows, to-wit: Beginning at a point on the north line of said Section 24, distant 917.90 feet easterly, measured along said line from the north quarter corner of said Section 24; thence easterly along said north line of said Section 24 to a point which is 1382.05 feet west of the northeast corner thereof; thence South 37 degrees 34 minutes 46 seconds east (said North line of said Section 24 thruout these courses herein described, having an assumed bearing of south 90 degrees east) a distance of 133.7 feet; thence south 7 degrees 23 minutes east a distance of 307.64 feet; thence south 82 degrees 22 minutes west to the easterly shore of Farquar Lake; thence northwesterly along the shore of said Lake to the point of intersection with a line drawn from the point of beginning south 24 degrees west to the shore of said Lake; thence north in a straight line to the point of beginning. Torrens Property Torrens Certificate No. 162022. Parcel 2: All that part of Government Lot 1, Section 24, Township 115, Range 20, described as follows, to-wit: Beginning at a point on the north line of said Section 24, 1382.05 feet west of the northeast corner of said Section 24; thence south 37 degrees, 34 minutes, 46 seconds east (said North line of said Section 24 thruout these courses herein described, having an assumed bearing of South 90 degrees east) 133.7 feet; thence south 7 degrees 23 minutes east a distance of 307.64 feet to the place of beginning of the land being herein described: From said place of beginning proceed south 7 degrees 23 minutes east a distance of 92.36 feet, thence south 41 degrees 15 minutes east a distance of 230.0 feet; thence south 46 degrees 08 minutes east a distance of 140.0 feet; thence south 22 degrees 24 minutes east a distance of 237.7 feet; thence north 76 degrees 52 minutes west to the shore of Farquar lake; thence northwesterly along the shore of said Lake to the point of intersection with a line drawn from the place of beginning of the land being herein described south 82 degrees and 22 minutes west to the shore of said Lake; thence north 82 degrees and 22 minutes east to the said place of beginning according to the Government Survey thereof. Torrens Property Torrens Certificate No. 162023. Parcel 3: That parcel of land located in Government Lot 1, Section 24, Township 115, Range 20, Dakota County, Minnesota lying West of the West right of way line of S.A.R. No. 33 and East of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the north line of said Government Lot 1, Section 24, said point is 1,382.05 feet west of the Northeast corner of Section 24; thence South 37 degrees 34 minutes 46 seconds East (said North line of Government Lot 1 having an assumed bearing of South 2 90 degrees East) a distance of 133.7 feet; thence South 07 degrees 23 minutes East a distance of 400.00 feet; thence South 41 degrees 15 minutes East a distance of 230.00 feet; thence South 46 degrees 08 minutes East a distance of 140.00 feet; thence South 22 degrees 24 minutes East a distance of 237.70 feet and there terminating. Abstract Source: Preliminary Plat, dated 12/2/2020 Comprehensive Plan Designation LD - Low Density Residential, 3-6 units/acre Zoning Classification R-1 – Single family residential, 40,000 sf min. lot; “SH” (Shoreland Overlay) Existing Platting Lots are unplatted parcels. Current Land Use Two vacant parcels and one large lot single family residential parcel Size: Gross Site Area 8.12 acres (353,721 sq. ft.) Diamond Path Right-of-Way 0.26 acres Wetlands and Bluff Area unbuilable 0.92 acres Maximum wetland/bluff unbuild at 10% 0.81 acres Total lot area (after ROW dedication & 10% natural features) = 7.05 acres Topography: Two large knolls and significant grade changes throughout the site. A 65 foot elevation change occurs from the knoll on the north side of the site down to Farquar Lake. A knoll adjacent to Diamond Path has 43 feet in elevation change from highest point down to Farquar Lake. The northern portion of the site, 0.88 acres will remain undisturbed bluff area. Existing Vegetation Site is heavily wooded. Tree removal will require tree mitigation as required in Chapter 152, Natural Resources Management chapter of the City Code. Other Significant Natural Features The three parcels abut Farquar Lake and the development is located within the “SH” (Shoreland Overlay) zoning district. In addition, a wetland has been identified and delineated along the southwest area of the development abutting the shoreline. Adjacent Properties/Land Uses NORTH Single family home Comprehensive Plan LD-Low Density Residential (3-6 units/acre) Zoning/Land Use R-1 Single Family 40,000 s.f. SOUTH Single family home Comprehensive Plan LD-Low Density Residential (3-6 units/acre) Zoning/Land Use R-1 Single Family 40,000 s.f. EAST Evermoor Townhomes Common Area Comprehensive Plan LD-Low Density Residential (3-6 units/acre) Zoning/Land Use PD-681 WEST Farquar Lake Comprehensive Plan WAT – Water/Pond Zoning/Land Use Water/Pond 3 Development Project Review Comprehensive Plan: The Comprehensive Plan guides the site for “LD” (Low Density Residential, 3-6 units/acre) development. Seventeen (17) detached villa townhomes would result in a development density of 2.4 units/acre which is less than 3 units per acre currently specified in the comprehensive plan. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan states that in some cases of infill development when there are severe slopes, mature trees, lakes, wetlands, or existing adjunct residential neighborhoods, densities of less than three units per acre may be required. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation. Zoning: The property is zoned “R-1” (Single family residential, 40,000 sq. ft. min. lot). In addition, the property is located within the “SH” (Shoreland Overlay) zoning district. The petitioners request a rezoning of the property from R-1 to “PD” (Planned Development). The plan would be to develop the property in a townhome layout where the detached villa townhomes are grouped together along the private street, and then an outlot, owned in common by the homeowners, would be between the townhomes and the lake and provide buffering and infiltration between the townhomes and the lake. Preliminary Plat: The three existing parcels are unplatted lots. The petitioners plan to subdivide the property so that it contains 17 detached villa townhome lots and three common-ownership outlots. Since the time of the public hearing, the shape of the outlots has been revised so that the community beach amenity area is separated from Outlots A and D, the common ownership open lot and bluff lot respectively. Additional right-of-way will be dedicated for Diamond Path. Dakota County has reviewed the preliminary plat and made comments. Because the site abuts a County road it is subject to Dakota County’s Contiguous Plat Ordinance and subject to the County spacing requirements. The County is limiting the number of access points for this development to two. One is proposed. The County review letter indicates that the proposed access point could be converted to a right-in/right-out access in the future if a center median is constructed in this area. §153.60 Environmental Protection states, “In the subdividing of land, due regard shall be shown for the protection of all natural terrain features of the site.” The petitioners revised earlier plans so that the northern portion of the site, the bluff area, will remain undisturbed. The dedication of Outlot A as a natural buffer area owned in common by the Homeowners’ Association will provide additional buffering and filtering of the lake. Site Plan: The site plan shows how the lots will be configured on the site. Small lot detached villa townhome parcels allow the petitioners to cluster the home sites together to create larger common ownership parcels. Separating the home sites from the lakeshore limits the lake access to one shared access point. The petitioner states that they plan to plant the open area with natural vegetation which will help provide filtering between the townhomes and the lake. The proposed private street accesses Diamond Path and is 28’ wide which will allow parking on one side of the street. The private street terminates in a cul-de-sac on the north side and hammerhead turn-around on the south. The Fire Department is concerned that the hammerhead does not currently meet the City’s standards and will require clarification. 4 Natural Resources: The site is located within the “SH” (Shoreland Overlay) zoning district of Farquar Lake. In addition, a wetland has been identified and delineated on the site. Any work around the wetland will be required to conform to the State’s Wetland Conservation Act rules. The site is also heavily wooded with varied terrain. Attached is a memo from the City’s Natural Resources staff outlining measures the City has taken to improve water quality and the steps that will be taken to protect the site during construction. Farquar Lake is currently listed as an “Impaired Water” according to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) due to excess nutrients. Stormwater treatment and management will be an important issue related to this project. Buffers are required adjacent to wetlands and the lake shore. The petitioner plans to provide buffering through Outlot A. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) reviewed the development plans and provided a letter in response. The DNR notes that a planned development is able to provide additional buffering and restrict lake access in a way that a single-family subdivision would not be able to do. Grading Plan: The grading plan was reviewed by the City Engineer and his comments are attached. The majority of the site will be graded to make the site suitable for development. The petitioners show that an infiltration basin will be created between the townhomes and the lake to provide pretreatment of storm water before it enters the lake. Tree Removal and Mitigation Plans: A tree removal plan and mitigation plan were submitted showing that a total of the total 7,064 caliper inches of significant trees on the site, the development will remove 5,292 caliper inches. A total of 10% of the removed caliper inches or 212 two and one-half inch caliper trees must replace the removed caliper inches. Elevation Drawings: Elevation drawings are provided showing the preliminary exterior design proposed for the homes. More information is needed to confirm the exterior building materials. Landscape Plan: The value of the landscape plantings must meet or exceed 2.5% of the value of the construction of the buildings based on Means Construction Data. The replacement trees will be counted toward the landscape requirement. Municipal Utilities: City utilities are available to the site with water available along Diamond Path and sanitary sewer behind the building pads in the rear yards. A separate sanitary sewer line will be extended along the east side of the development along the private street to minimize disruptions along the lake shore. Street Classifications/Accesses/Circulation: • Diamond Path (B-Minor Arterial): Diamond Path (CSAH 33) is a rural section 2-lane County roadway with ditches and shoulders. There is a designated left turn lane southbound to east bound from Diamond Path onto Evermoor Parkway and a southbound bypass lane. One access onto Diamond Path is proposed. 5 • Private shared street: 28’ wide. Parking will be allowed on one side of the street. Hydrants should be installed on the side of the street opposite of the on-street parking. Pedestrian Access: The City requires the installation of sidewalk and trail along public streets for all new developments. Because Diamond Path is not an urban section at this time, an escrow for the future construction of a pathway along Diamond Path will be required. When Diamond Path is upgraded, a path will be installed at that time. Public Safety Issues: The Fire Department states that the design of the hammerhead turn-around currently does not meet City standards. Recreation Issues: The site is located less than 250’ from Huntington Park on the northeast corner of Diamond Path and Pilot Knob Road. Park dedication is proposed to be satisfied with a cash-in- lieu of land dedication. Signs: No sign approvals are given at this time. No signs may be installed prior to the issuance of a permit. A separate sign permit must be obtained prior to the installation of any signs on the site or the building. Public Hearing Comments: The following is a summary of the comments and questions received at the Planning Commission’s December 16, 2020, Public Hearing. 1. Farquar Lake and Neighborhood Characteristics: a. Please provide a review of the Farquar Lake shoreline and neighborhood area. Staff response: Farquar Lake is 67 acres with an average depth of 4.5’ and a maximum depth of 10’. Twenty-four lots abut the lake, with 21 single family home lots, one park property, one private boat launch and one vacant parcel. Dakota County information states that the homes on the lake were constructed between 1954 and 2007. Thirteen lots are platted and 11 lots are unplatted. Year Homes Constructed, Farquar Lake 1954 - 1959 6 1960 – 1969 4 1970 – 1979 5 1980 – 1989 1 1990 – 1999 2 2000+ 3 Total 21 The properties surrounding Farquar Lake have developed slowly over time. The first subdivision, Farquar Lake Addition, was platted in 1959. The majority of the homes were constructed before 1990 (16 before 1990, 5 after 1990). The “SH” (Shoreland Overlay) zone was enacted in 1989. 6 Lot Sizes Lot Size (Acres) Number of Lots < 1 7 1-2 8 2-3 3 3+ 3 Total 21 The shoreline characteristics for each property varies, with some lots containing full beaches, some containing a wooded private buffer, and some containing a mix of the two. A very rough analysis was done comparing manicured shoreland (sand beach, mowed lawn abutting the lake) coverage verse natural shoreline. The rough calculations were taken from aerial photos, so the findings were best estimates based on the data available and subject to further refinement. Beach/Manicured Lawn to Natural Buffer Ratio Ratio Sand Beach/ Manicured Lawn to Natural Edge (% Manicured Coverage) Number of Properties Identified > 50% 3 40% - 50% 0 30%-40% 3 20%-30% 1 10%-20% 5 < 10% 12 Total 24 Only three of the 24 lots have manicured beaches/lawn that exceed 50% of the length of their shoreline. Staff believes that in at least one of those cases, the beach is naturally occurring and not a constructed feature. The situation with the other full beach lots may be similar. Another three parcels appear to have a 30% beach/manicured lawn coverage. The balance of the properties have a ratio of beach coverage to natural plantings well under 20% on their shorelines. In summary: Farquar Lake has public access for non-motorized boats and fishing, but is otherwise a fairly shallow lake in a suburban community. Motor boats may be used in a limited manner by property owners surrounding the lake. The lake is most used for non-motorized boating, fishing and aesthetic enjoyment. b. What is the public access to the lake? Staff response: Farquar Park is an approximately 11-acre park that provides access to the lake. It contains a canoe launch and fishing pier for direct lake access. In addition, the park contains sheltered picnic areas, tennis courts and an outdoor play area. A boat launch is owned privately by the Farquar Lake Homeowners’ Association; the launch is only 7 available to the lake association members and the City through an easement for lake access. 2. City Review Methodology: a. Why is this development being compared to a 7-lot single family subdivision? Staff response: The City is using the 7-lot subdivision as a comparison because it appears that a 7-lot single family subdivision would meet the current requirements for the R- 1 zoning district. While the developer would still need to apply for subdivision and other approvals from the City, the property owner would have the right to develop the property in a manner that meets the City’s zoning and subdivision requirements. When a developer requests a rezoning of property, the City is able to evaluate whether the requested amendment is in keeping with the City’s vision and consistent with vision and goals of the Comprehensive Plan. b. Why is the City assuming that all of the homes in a 7-lot single family subdivision would have docks and beaches? Staff response: As stated above, the City is analyzing the request in light of a seven lot single family development to compare how each might impact the lake and surrounding area. If the site were developed for seven single family lots, the lots would command a premium price because they are lakeshore properties in a suburban community. The assumption is that a property owner who pays a premium price for a lake lot would likely want to take full advantage of the shoreline. 3. Site Design Issues: a. How will snow storage and snow plowing be managed? Staff response: The petitioner has responded to this question by saying that the Homeowners’ Association will hire a snow removal contractor to plow the private streets. Under typical snow events, snow will be stored in the boulevards. In a larger snowfall event, it may be necessary to haul the snow off-site. Staff’s preference would be for the developer to identify a location of the site to provide snow storage so that hauling snow would not be a requirement. b. How many guest parking spaces are required? Is there adequate guest parking? Staff response: Parking standards would be established in connection with the PD zoning district. Typically, the City requires ½ parking spaces per unit as off-street parking. A total of 17 townhome units would need a minimum of nine off-street parking spaces. In townhome developments, the parking areas are usually grouped parking spaces for visitors. The private street is 28’ wide which will allow on-street parking on one side. The petitioners indicate 34 on-street parking spaces will be provided, but the size of the spaces look to be less than 25’. In addition, the driveways are a minimum of 20’ long and two spaces wide to allow two parking spaces on the driveways. Staff is satisfied that the number of needed parking spaces has been met. 4. Natural Resources Protection 8 a. How will this development impact the Shoreland Impact Zone? Staff response: The petitioner provided updated plans that further minimizes impacts to the Shoreland Impact Zone (SIZ). The SIZ is 50% of the width of the required shoreland setback, or 37.5’ from the Ordinary High Water Level (OHWL). The DNR requires that a minimum of 70% of the SIZ remain in an undisturbed, natural state. The petitioners state the following: • Undisturbed open spaces will amount to 0.64 acres or 69.6% of the SIZ. • Disturbed and restored open space will amount to 0.23 acres or 25% of the SIZ. • The amenity area comprises .05 acres or 5.4% of the SIZ area. • Finally, in total, the protected natural area of the SIZ will total 94.6% of the Cove shoreline. b. What measures will be used to protect the lake during development and after the development is completed? Staff response: Please see City Engineer memo. Prior to any site disturbing activity, including grading or tree removal, the developer will be required to obtain a Natural Resources Management Permit (NRMP). City ordinances strictly regulate grading and development activities to help protect natural resources. c. Will the development negatively impact wild life and habitat? Staff response: Natural Resources staff state the City’s experience has been that wild life living in this area will experience a short-term disruption, then are likely to reestablish once construction is completed. The development plans indicate that the Outlot A, the natural open space area, will be landscaped with a number of deciduous and coniferous trees and a prairie seed mix that has been approved by MnDOT. 5. Potential Neighborhood Impacts. a. Will the requested rezoning of the property be a major change to the character of the neighborhood? Staff response: The proposed development is a different development form than what currently exists along Farquar Lake. Villa townhome developments are located throughout the City and provide a single-family owned home on an association-maintained common area. b. Will this development set a precedent? Staff response: A comment was received with a concern that a development like this may encourage further development and redevelopment around the lake. The City will receive more and more requests for redevelopment throughout the City as land becomes more scarce and the value of land increases. Each development must be reviewed based upon the specific facts of the development. In this case, the property owner owns two vacant lots in addition to the former Houston property with a total area of 8.1 acres. c. Will this development negatively impact lake aesthetics? Staff response: Aesthetics are a very subjective topic and are difficult to quantify and measure. City Ordinance related to the existing R-1 zone offers some guidance by mentioning that natural features, characteristics of the site and surrounding property 9 should be considered. Homes are spaced a certain way around the lake. Natural breaks between homes predominates. About two percent of the property in the City is designated for R-1 uses, making this a unique and limited use with a minimum sq. ft. of 40,000 for each new lot developed. The planned development approach offers both flexibility and conflicts. City staff is preparing some additional exhibits that will share a virtual tour of the lake and the proposed outcome. After the tour at the next meeting, the Planning Commission may wish to consider the context of 20 existing homes on Lake Farquar, covering about ¾’s of the residential shoreline now and the addition of 17 additional homes on about ¼ of the residential shore line of the lake in the proposal. Is that the right number? Is the proposed development sustaining the character and context, of the built lake environment? If seven (7) single family homes is a minimum, is 17 villa townhomes a maximum? Or, does another number in-between better represent a context sensitive development response. The number of villa townhomes proposed fully maximizes the unit potential of the site, and limits the natural spacing between units that is a characteristic of the location. 6. If this development remained R-1, would the City be able to require dedication of an outlot that would provide filtration like the “PD” plan requirement? Staff response: Most likely, no. Again, the value of the property would be based on lake access. In order to obtain a rezoning to PD (Planned Development) in the SH zoning district requires these specific conditions: • The portions of the Shore Impact Zone must be a minimum of 70%. The petitioner proposes to preserve 69.5% of the SIZ as undisturbed area. In total, 94.6% of the SIZ will remain in a natural state after development. • The development open space requirement is 50%. In connection with the development, a minimum of 50% of open space must be dedicated and established as common ownership property. The petitioners are proposing to dedicate Outlot A, the common ownership property between the townhomes and the lake, at 2.19 acres and Outlot D, the bluff area, at 1.5 acres, for a total of 3.69 acres or 52% of the project land area. • Centralize shore recreation facilities. Care has been taken to create a small beach area for the development with the beach totaling 0.05 acres or 5.4% of the SIZ area. LONG LAKE FARQUAR LAKE SITEAPPLE VALLEYROSEMOUNTDIAMOND PATH DIAMOND P A T HPILOT KNOB RDEMMERPLDULUTHDR DOVER DR 132ND ST W EMBRY W A Y DO M IN IC A W A YDORY AVEELKWOO D D R1 2 9T H ST W DENMARK AVEDUNBA R W AY DOW N EYTRL127T HS T W DORC H E S T E RTRLECH O LN128TH ST W D U R HAM W A Y EVERMOOR PKWYEDINBROOKPATHEASTVIEW CTEDGEMO N T C U R V ELDERBER R YC TTHE COVE μ AERIAL LOCATION MAP ^ HD SITE DIAMOND PATHPILOT KNOB RDDORY AVE129TH ST W DENMARK AVEECHO LNDOWNEY TRL128TH ST W DORCHESTER TRL DU R H A M W A Y DOMINICA W A Y P LD LD LD LD LD LD LD DIAMOND PAT H PILOT KN OB R D DORY AVEDENMARK AVEEVERMOOR PKWY DOMI NI C A W A Y μ THE COVE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP ^ A FARQUAR LAKE SITE EVEREST AVEE L L I CETRLEMMERPL137THST W T W W EUCLIDAVE 132ND ST W 138THS T W DOVER DR E V E R E S T TRL D O R C HESTERTRLEVELETHAVEE THPATHDO M IN IC A W A YDORY AVEEUCLELKW O O D D REMBRYWAY DENMARK AVEA R TRDDOW N E YTRLDUNBARW AY THCTVEECH O LNDRIFTWOODLN EVEL E T HW A Y D URHAM W A Y E VERGREEN CT E V ERMOOR PKWY 13 3 RD STREET C T VERTONAVEEDINBR O O K P ATHETH E L T O N WAY138TH S T REET C T EASTVIEW CT EDGEM O N T C URV ELDERBE R R Y C T 1 3 6 T H S T R E E T C T DIAM O N D CT E L A ND C T E M P R ESSCTEDEN CT1 3 8 T H C IRWELKHART C TEMMER CT 128TH S T W 1 2 9 T H ST W 134TH S TW1 3 8 T H S T W 12 7 THS TW 128TH ST W A P A P P P P P R-2 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-1 R-1 R-1 R-3 R-1 R-3 R-3 R-1 R-3 R-1 R-1 R-3 R-1 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-5 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-1 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-1 R-3 R-1 R-1 R-3 R-3 R-1 R-1 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-1 R-3 R-1 R-3 R-1 R-1 R-3 R-3 M-7C M-7C M-7C M-7C M-7C M-4C R-CL M-2C R-CL PD-681 PD-681 PD-681 1 1 2 μ THE COVE ZONING MAP ^ FARQUAR LAKE SITE 9109309009209509 4 0 96 0 970980 960 93097093094093093 0 950 910 910 9 1 0 9 5 0 930 9 5 0 950 94 0 930960 930950920 950940 930940960DIAMOND PATH129TH ST W EVERMOOR PKWYDORY AVETHE COVE μ CONTOUR MAP ^ The Cove Oblique Aerial View OHWLCOMMON DOCKS/BOAT SLIPSCOMMON AREAFIREPIT /PICNICOHWLCONSERVATIONEASEMENT3.7 acDELINEATEDWETLANDEXISTING BEACH20' BLUFFIMPACT ZONEBLUFF PER SHORELANDORDINANCE75' OWHLSETBACK (MIN.)123456123412OUTLOT AOUTLOT BOUTLOT C23DIAMOND PATHDIAMOND PATHOUTLOT D121OUTLOT B54N:\0025743.01\DWG\0025743.01C-SITE-SRM2.DWG 11PROJECT NUMBER: 0025743.01APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA03/05/2021...© 2017 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.THE COVELAYOUT EXHIBIT650 QUAKER AVENUEJORDAN, MINNESOTATHE COVE03/05/2021JMH LAND DEVELOPMENTNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone(952) 937-515012701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Fax(952) 937-5822Minnetonka, MN 55343Toll Free(888) 937-5150DATE:LICENSE NO.Common Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com50'0'50'100'150'1" = 50' Draft Planned Development Ordinance The Cove (Subject to Final Revisions and Approval by City Council) Section 1. The official zoning map be amended to rezone and add as Planned Development Designation No. ____, Zone 1, the property located on the northwest corner of Diamond Path and Evermoor Parkway, 13009 Diamond Path and legally described as: [Legal Description], proposed to be subdivided and platted as: THE COVE. Section 2. The Apple Valley Code of Ordinances be amended by adding Article ____ to Chapter 155 - Appendix F as follows: ARTICLE A___. DESIGNATION NO. _____ § A__-1 PURPOSE. The purpose of this article is to establish specific performance standards in compliance with § A1-____ for property designated by Ordinance No. ___ on the official zoning map. Minnesota law has delegated responsibility to the City to regulate the subdivision, use, and development of the land within the shorelands of protected public waters for the preservation of water quality, natural characteristics, environmental values, and the general health, safety and welfare for all protected waters. The purpose of this planned development-zoning district is to establish specific performance standards to allow development of detached villa homes in a clustered configuration that provides greater protection of Farquar Lake and wetland resources than could not be achieved with standard detached single-family development. § A___-2 PERMITTED USES. (A) Zone 1. Within this zone, no structure or land shall be used except for the one or more of the following uses deemed similar by the City Council: (1) Detached one-family dwellings where the dwelling units comprise the lot of record and the open space or yard surrounding the units is not exclusively owned by the dwelling unit owner and is instead owned as a CIC or other common property interests, provided they are serviced by public sanitary sewer and water systems. (2) Community based family care home, day care home licensed under M.S. § 245.812 or such home for the care of the mentally or physically handicapped licensed by the state. (3) Public utility buildings and structures. (4) Home occupation as defined in § 155.003 . § A___-3 CONDITIONAL USES. (A) Zone 1. Within these zones, no structure or land shall be used except for the one or more of the following uses or uses deemed similar by the City Council except through the granting of a conditional use permit: (1) Community-based family care home, day care home not licensed under M.S. § 245.812 or a community-based residential care facility or day care facility in a multiple dwelling unit when: DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION 2 (a) Facility meets all existing health, fire, building and housing codes. (b) Separation of one-quarter mile exists between such facilities. The City Council may grant exception to the one-quarter mile rule when strong community support exists, program effectiveness is closely tied to particular cultural resources in the community, or an effective natural or manmade barrier exists between facilities. § A___-4 PERMITTED ACCESSORY USES. (A) Zone 1. Within this zone, no structure or land shall be used except for the one or more of the following uses or uses deemed similar by the City Council shall be permitted accessory uses: (1) Buildings temporarily located for the purposes of construction of the premises for a period not to exceed the time necessary to complete said construction. (2) Temporary sales office. (3) Essential public service facilities provided all requirements are met. § A___-5 MINIMUM AREA STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS. (A) The following minimum area standards and requirements shall be met and no improvements shall be placed on such lands unless the lands to be used or improved shall meet the following area and dimensional requirements. (1) Each dwelling units shall be detached one-family unit not to exceed a total of 17 dwelling units. (B) The following minimum area standards and requirements shall be met and no improvements shall be placed on such lands unless the lands to be used or improved shall meet the following area and dimensional requirements. (1) Table of Minimum Area Standards and Requirements. Requirements Minimum lot dimensions Lot area (square feet): 5,000 Lot width (feet) 50 Lot depth (feet) 100 Minimum building setbacks (feet) Along principal or arterial streets 50 Along collector streets 40 Along local streets 30 Along any private street (distance in feet from the curbline of the private street) 20 Side lot line (feet) 7.5 Between structures (feet) 15 Ordinary High Water Level (OHWL) 75 Maximum building height (feet)* 25 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION 3 Maximum number of stories One + Walk- out Basement Maximum Impervious Surface Area – Total Project Area 25% Minimum Common Open Space – Total Project Area 50% Minimum maintained natural and undisturbed Shore Impact Zone (SIZ) Area 70% Minimum parking setback (feet) 15 *Building height shall be measured from elevation of the first floor to highest point of the roof. The exposed foundation of any structure shall not exceed four feet. (2) Screening, see § 155.348. (3) Landscaping, see § 155.349. (4) Lighting, see § 155.353. (5) Parking, see §§ 155.370 through 155.379. (C) § A___-__ SPECIAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS. Note: • No improvements or other structures or any disturbance in defined “bluff area” • No accessory structures allowed on individual lot and outlots, except decks/porches permitted for individual dwelling units subject to setbacks and one dock/mooring not to exceed three (3) boat slips Shoreland Protection. The site abuts Farquar Lake which is classified by the DNR as a protected public water, and is therefore subject to the requirements of the “SH” (Shoreland Overlay) zoning district and the additional requirements as follows: LIST ALL RESTRICTION/REGULATION IN ORDINANCE (1) Shoreland Protection Zone and Bluff Protection Zone Established. Outlot A is designated as a “Shoreland Protection Zone” and Outlot D is dedicated as a “Bluff Protection Zone.” The use of the two zones shall be limited as follows: a. Except for purposes of and during development of the property, the zones shall be maintained in a natural, undisturbed state. b. No excavation or change in the topography shall be allowed, except as may be authorized by the City, in writing, as the City shall, in its sole discretion, determine is appropriate. c. The following activities shall be prohibited, DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION 4 i. Constructing, installing, storing or maintaining anything made by man, including but not limited to, buildings, structures, fences, walkways, clothes line poles, patios, fire pits and playground equipment; ii. Parking of vehicles; iii. Planting of gardens or trees; iv. Storage of firewood; or v. Cutting or removal of live vegetation and trees. d. No cutting or harvesting of any live tree or other live vegetative cover within the Shoreland Protection Zone or Bluff Protection zone shall be permitted except as may be authorized by the City, in writing, as the City shall, in its sole discretion, determine is appropriate. e. If any tree within the Shoreland Protection Zone or the Bluff Protection Zone becomes insect infested or diseased or dies, the Property owner shall obtain written confirmation from the City Forester that the tree should be removed prior to such removal. If any living tree that is not diseased or insect-infested is removed from the Shoreland Protection Zone or Bluff Protection Zone, the Property owner shall replace it with an equivalent tree or trees as determined by the City Forester. [Natural Resources Conditions] (2) Wetland Protection. A wetland delineation was approved on 7/9/2020. The applicant must address any proposed wetland impacts, such as the proposed raingarden outlet, through the appropriate WCA application – no loss, de minimus, etc. if necessary. (3) Vegetative Buffers. A minimum vegetated buffers must be installed and maintained as follows: a. Wetland buffer: Buffer width adjacent to the wetland is 40’ average with a 30’ minimum. A 10’ building setback from the buffer is required. The buffer width is based on their wetland rating from the Vermillion River Watershed Joint Powers Organization wetland assessment from 2007 (Manage 1). b. Shoreline buffer: a minimum of 16.5’adjacent to the lake where there is no additional wetland. c. Stormwater treatment buffer: a minimum of 16.5 foot vegetated buffer zone abutting stormwater management ponds/infiltration basins. (4) The applicant shall comply with the following buffer standards: a. A protective buffer zone component (PBC) shall be submitted as part of the natural resource management plan in compliance with 152.16 (4)(b)(5). The plan shall incorporate native seed mixes (highlighted below) and DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION 5 recommended maintenance efforts associated with them. (5) The City requires that protective buffer zones be established consistent with the procedures and criteria established in City ordinance chapter 152.57. The protective buffer zone shall be memorialized in perpetuity by a written document approved by the City and a certified survey of the property which shall be recorded by Dakota County. The document shall establish the location of any buffer zones, restrictions, allowances, and management requirements. a. The delineated wetland is classified as “Manage 1”. The south raingarden discharges into the delineated wetland. The City requires that hydrologic impacts to wetlands resulting from development and redevelopment activities do not exceed the following: b. Where protective buffer zones are established, the City requires the upland boundary line to be identified by permanent markers, approved by the City at each lot line, and one at every 50-foot interval. Sign information can be provided by the City. c. The HOA shall provide ongoing resources required to properly maintain the required vegetative and storm water management areas. This will include maintenance of the stormwater features including any stormwater pipes/sumps necessary for the stormwater feature to function AND the long-term vegetation maintenance of the buffers and raingardens. The management plan shall considers the maintenance recommendation of the proposed seed mixes. (6) Minnesota DNR Rules & Regulations. The applicant shall comply with all MN DNR permitting requirements for the following items: a. Docks: The applicant shall obtain all required permits for boat slip excavation prior to any land disturbing activity. b. Sand blankets: No fill or addition of sand beach shall be permitted. The existing beach shall remain compliant with current state regulations and City ordinance (see 152.57 (E)(7)). DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION 6 c. Ice Ridge: There appears to be a small ice ridge in some locations along the shoreline. State regulations only allow regrading of ice ridges in certain limited cases. A DNR permit may be required and DNR regulations may prohibit this activity. (7) Residential dwelling design: The following design elements shall be incorporated into the planned development to assure an overall sense of harmony. (a) A building or group of buildings shall maintain a compatible relationship with the surrounding context of an area in regard to: i. Rhythm of spaces between buildings. ii. Rhythm of facade details and relationships, such as relationship to horizontal or vertical lines, and facade openings. iii. Building scale and mass and setbacks. iv. Building forms and roof shapes. (b) All building elevations shall be considered a front for the purpose of exterior building material use and appearance. (c) The buildings shall be single story buildings with or without basements. (d) The exterior of the buildings shall be constructed with an exterior of non- combustible, non-degradable and maintenance-free construction material (such as brick, natural stone or cultured stone) or a high quality composite siding material such as cementitious fiberboard, LP Smart siding, or similar. Section 3. Summary approved. The City Council hereby determines that the text of the summary marked "Official Summary of Ordinance No. _____", a copy of which is attached hereto, clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance. The City Council further determines that publication of the title and such summary will clearly inform the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance. Section 4. Filing. The City Clerk shall file a copy of this ordinance in her office, which copy shall be available for inspection by any person during regular office hours. Section 5. Publication. The City Clerk shall publish the title of this ordinance and the official summary in the official newspaper of the City with notice that a printed copy of the ordinance is available for inspection by any person during regular office hours a the office of the City Clerk. Section 6. Effective date. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication of its title and official summary. PASSED by the City Council this ___th day of ____, 2021. ___________________________ Clint Hooppaw, Mayor DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION 7 ATTEST: _____________________________ Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION 8 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY ORDINANCE NO. ______ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE A___ OF APPENDIX A OF THE CITY CODE BY ALLOWING ____ IN PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DESIGNATION NO. _____. The following is the official summary of Ordinance No. ___ approved by the City Council of Apple Valley on ____, 2021. Sections ____ of Appendix A of the City Code are amended by adding guidelines by which ____________________________ A printed copy of the ordinance is available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Clerk at the Apple Valley City Hall, 7100 – 147th Street West, Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124. S S S S S S S SAN SAN SAN SANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSAN SANSANSANSANSANSAN12312345 67891011121314OUTLOT AOUTLOT BOUTLOT C122OUTLOT B 559166,035 sf6,318 sf10,239 sf4155555555555555555542387555136855555555555510255555546 10210214741434 44459545237361 1025719 102102102102102102851024395651910152100605664321241102199190±6,571 sf6,064 sfDIAMOND PATHDIAMOND PATH5,637 sf5,881 sf5,641 sf5,637 sf5,635 sf5,638 sf5,632 sf5,630 sf5,640 sf5,639 sf5,636 sfMAIL18166,827 sf5,984 sf65,233 sf33 1 1004869 117 92 19 37 45 111190 3410423115612 95,222 sf20213333 54179 136461 1917812061111284471221485537208OUTLOT D11,891 sf10' BITUMINOUS TRAILCONSERVATION EASEMENTCOMMON AREA(FIRE PIT/BENCH)BLUFF AREA20' BLUFFIMPACT ZONEOWHL PERREHDER & ASSOCEDGE OF WATER; FIELD LOCATED ON 10/21/2020(ELEV = 898.56 (NAVD88)PRIVATE DOCKS75' OHWL SETBACK28B-B28B-BR48EXISTINGSANITARYSEWERLINE EXISTINGSANITARYSEWER LINE32B-B1010110120120LAKE FARQUARWETLAND DELINEATED BYKJOLHAUG ENVIRONMENTALSERVICESRETAINING WALLCOMMON AREA(BEACH)20 FT DRAINAGE &UTILITY EASEMETPER DOC NO.545453PONDINGEASEMENT PER DOCNO. 3063625PONDINGEASEMENT PER DOCNO. 306362420 FT DRAINAGE &UTILITY EASEMENTPER DOC NO.306362320 FT DRAINAGE &UTILITY EASEMETPER DOC NO.306362328B-B28B-B20B-B20B-BR10R20 R2860'70'40' BUFFER ADJACENTTO WETLAND16.5' BUFFER ADJACENTTO LAKE FARQUARD/U EASEMENT OVERALL OF OUTLOT CD/U EASEMENT OVERALL OF OUTLOT BSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone(952) 937-515012701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Fax(952) 937-5822Minnetonka, MN 55343Toll Free(888) 937-5150DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTAN:\0025743.01\DWG\CIVIL\PRELIM\0025743.01S-SPP01.DWG 143PROJECT NUMBER: 0025743.01APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA01/07/21RMBRMBCHF© 2020 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.THE COVEPRELIMINARY PLAT650 QUAKER AVENUEJORDAN, MINNESOTATHE COVE11/XX/20JMH LAND DEVELOPMENTPRELIMINARY PLANSCommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com50.000019'10' OR 5'0'50'100'150'1" = 50'##########· EXISTING ZONING: R-1; SINGLE FAMILY· SITE GUIDING:LOW DENS. RESIDENTIAL· GROSS SITE AREA: 8.12 AC MAJOR R.O.W. (DIAMOND PATH):0.26 ACEXISTING WETLANDS (ABOVE OHWL)0.04 ACBLUFF AREA: 0.88 AC· NET SITE AREA: 6.89 AC· DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY 55' WIDE VILLA LOTS17 HOMES· PROJECT OPEN SPACE (OUTLOT A, B, C LESS PRIVATE DR): 4.69 AC (57.8%)·· SEE OUTLOT TABLE BELOW· PROJECT DENSITY: GROSS: ±2.09 UN/AC NET: ±2.47 UN/ACMINIMUM LOT AREASITE DEVELOPMENT DATALOT STANDARDS1.ALL LOT DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST FOOT.2.ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT.3.STREET NAMES ARE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE CITY.4.DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED AS REQUIRED. DRAINAGE AND UTILITYEASEMENTS WILL BE PROVIDED OVER ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES AND UP TO 1 FOOT ABOVE THEHIGH WATER LEVEL OF ALL PONDS.5.STREET WIDTHS ARE SHOWN FROM BACK OF CURB TO BACK OF CURB.DEVELOPMENT NOTESAVERAGE LOT AREAMINIMUM LOT WIDTHMINIMUM LOT DEPTHSETBACKSFRONTSIDE INTERIOR LOTSTANDARD55' VILLA HOMES5,630 SF6,131 SF55'100'20' MIN TO BOC7.5'/7.5'; 15' TOTALOUTLOT TABLEOUTLOTAGROSSAREAUSEOWNERSHIPCONSERVATION EASEMENTHOA2.19 ACBPRIVATE DRIVE/BUFFERHOA1.52 ACCTRAIL, BEACH & COMMONGATHERING AREAHOA0.27 ACTYPICAL 55' VILLA LOT DETAIL10'5'10'7.5'20'5'55'55'100' 100'21DRAINAGE &UTILITY EASEMENTTYPICAL LOTDIMENSIONFRONT BUILDINGSETBACK FROM BOCBUILDINGSETBACKLINELOT NUMBERLOT LINESIDE BUILDINGSETBACKPRIVATE DRIVE; BOCX,XXX SFLOT AREAOHWL /REAR75' MINFRONT LOTLINE1'BELOW OHWL:0.05 ACParcel 1:All that part of Government Lot 1, Section 24, Township 115, Range 20, described as follows, to-wit:Beginning at a point on the north line of said Section 24, distant 917.90 feet easterly, measured along said line from the north quarter cornerof said Section 24; thence easterly along said north line of said Section 24 to a point which is 1382.05 feet west of the northeast cornerthereof; thence South 37 degrees 34 minutes 46 seconds east (said North line of said Section 24 thruout these courses herein described, havingan assumed bearing of south 90 degrees east) a distance of 133.7 feet; thence south 7 degrees 23 minutes east a distance of 307.64 feet;thence south 82 degrees 22 minutes west to the easterly shore of Farquar Lake; thence northwesterly along the shore of said Lake to the pointof intersection with a line drawn from the point of beginning south 24 degrees west to the shore of said Lake; thence north in a straight line tothe point of beginning.Torrens PropertyTorrens Certificate No. 162022.Parcel 2:All that part of Government Lot 1, Section 24, Township 115, Range 20, described as follows, to-wit:Beginning at a point on the north line of said Section 24, 1382.05 feet west of the northeast corner of said Section 24; thence south 37degrees, 34 minutes, 46 seconds east (said North line of said Section 24 thruout these courses herein described, having an assumed bearing ofSouth 90 degrees east) 133.7 feet; thence south 7 degrees 23 minutes east a distance of 307.64 feet to the place of beginning of the land beingherein described: From said place of beginning proceed south 7 degrees 23 minutes east a distance of 92.36 feet, thence south 41 degrees 15minutes east a distance of 230.0 feet; thence south 46 degrees 08 minutes east a distance of 140.0 feet; thence south 22 degrees 24 minuteseast a distance of 237.7 feet; thence north 76 degrees 52 minutes west to the shore of Farquar lake; thence northwesterly along the shore ofsaid Lake to the point of intersection with a line drawn from the place of beginning of the land being herein described south 82 degrees and22 minutes west to the shore of said Lake; thence north 82 degrees and 22 minutes east to the said place of beginning according to theGovernment Survey thereof.Torrens PropertyTorrens Certificate No. 162023.Parcel 3:That parcel of land located in Government Lot 1, Section 24, Township 115, Range 20, Dakota County, Minnesota lying West of the West right ofway line of S.A.R. No. 33 and East of the following described line:Beginning at a point on the north line of said Government Lot 1, Section 24, said point is 1,382.05 feet west of the Northeast corner of Section24; thence South 37 degrees 34 minutes 46 seconds East (said North line of Government Lot 1 having an assumed bearing of South 90degrees East) a distance of 133.7 feet; thence South 07 degrees 23 minutes East a distance of 400.00 feet; thence South 41 degrees 15 minutesEast a distance of 230.00 feet; thence South 46 degrees 08 minutes East a distance of 140.00 feet; thence South 22 degrees 24 minutes East adistance of 237.70 feet and there terminating.AbstractLEGAL DESCRIPTION (PER TITLE COMMITMENT NO. HB-43904)BRENT R. PETERS4412301/07/21· OFF-STREET PARKING: ONE SIDE OF PRIVATE STREET : 34 SPACESDBLUFF AREAHOA1.50 AC N:\0025743.01\DWG\CIVIL\PRELIM\0025743.01S-CVP01.DWG THE COVE © 2020 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRELIMINARY PLANSTHE COVEAPPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTAPREPARED FOR:JMH LAND DEVELOPMENT650 QUAKER AVENUEJORDAN, MINNESOTACONTACT: MARK SONSTEGARDPHONE: (952) 452-9569EMAIL: MARK.SONSTEGARD@JMHLAND.COMSITEVicinity Map(NOT TO SCALE)SHEETSREVISIONDATENO.0112/02/20CITY COMMENTSALL..................FORFORSITE, GRADING, UTILITIES,AND LANDSCAPEPREPARED BY:PROJECT NUMBER: 0025743.01CONTACT: RYAN M. BLUHMPhone(952) 937-515012701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Fax(952) 937-5822Minnetonka, MN 55343Toll Free(888) 937-5150PRELIMINARY PLANSTHE COVEAPPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTAFORFORSITE, GRADING, UTILITIES, ANDLANDSCAPEINITIAL SUBMITTAL DATE: 11/04/20SHEET: 1 OF 14PROJECT NUMBER: 0025743.01SHEET INDEXSheet List TableSheet NumberSheet Title1Cover Sheet2Existing Conditions Plan3Preliminary Plat4Grading & Drainage Plan5Erosion Control Plan6Utility Plan7Details8Details9Profiles10Tree Preservation Plan11Tree Inventory12Tree Inventory13Preliminary Landscape Plan14Landscape Notes & Details WATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWAT WATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATS S SXXXXXXXXXXXXX X X XX XXXXXXT S S MAILE S S POH X X X X X X GASGASGASGASPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHXXXXXXXPOHPOHPOH XXXXXX X X X XXXX XXXXXPOHGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASSTOSANSANSANSANSANSANSAN SANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSAN SANSANSANSANSANSAN POHPOH POHEGNORTH LINE OF SEC. 24P.O.B. PARCEL 1 P.O.B. PARCEL 2WESTERLY R/W LINE OF DIAMOND PATH PERTHE PLAT OF EVERMOOR APPLE VALLEYP.O.B. PARCEL 3FD. 1/2" OPEN IRON PIPE C.S.A.H. NO . 33 (DIAMOND PATH)129TH STREET W20 FT DRAINAGE & UTILITYEASEMENT PER DOC NO. 54545320.020.010.010.010.010.0TEMPORARYCONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 50.060.050.060.050.0FD. 1" OPEN IRON PIPEFD. 1/2" IRON PIPELS #8235(0.42' NORTHERLY OFCORNER)FD. 1" OPENIRON PIPE FD. 1/2"PINCHTOP IRONPIPE(DISTURBED)FD. 1/2" OPENIRON PIPEFD. 1/2" OPENIRON PIPEFD. 1/2" OPENIRON PIPEFD. 1/2" OPENIRON PIPE EDGE OF WATER FIELDLOCATED ON 10/21/2020(ELEV = 898.56 NAVD88)””””””””””””PID: 010130077032RANDALL PROPP & RANDY NELSON PID: 010240002060 ANDREW & SARA NICKPID: 010130077032RANDALL PROPP & RANDY NELSONPID: 010240002040ADDRESS: 13009 DIAMOND PATHWETLAND DELINEATED BYKJOLHAUGENVIRONMENTALSERVICESPROPANETANKPOSSIBLE SOLARARRAY POSTBUT NO SOLARPANELS” 6ƒ ('((' 6ƒ ('((' 6ƒ :'((' 6ƒ :'((' PARCEL 1 6   ƒ   (          ' ( (' 6   ƒ   (         ' ( ( ' 6ƒ (   '((' 1ƒ  :   ' ( ( ' PARCEL 2PARCEL 3(PUBLIC STREET)FARQUAR LAKE(OHW = 899.2 NGVD29; PER DNR WEBSITE)HOUSESHED(307.64 DEED)(92.36 DEED)””WESTERLY R/W LINE OF DIAMOND PATH PERTHE PLAT OF EVERMOOR APPLE VALLEY”CENTERLINE OFGRAVEL PATH950960952954956958962964 922924926 926928 928900910902904906908912914 9109209309 0 4 9 0 6 9 0 8 91291491691892292492692893291092093094091291491691892292492692893293493693894220 FT DRAINAGE & UTILITYEASEMENT PER DOC NO. 306362320 FT DRAINAGE& UTILITYEASEMENT PERDOC NO.3063622PONDINGEASEMENT PERDOC NO. 3063625PONDINGEASEMENT PERDOC NO. 30636246ƒ :”1ƒ :47.231ƒ :∆=023°42'00"R=1061.16L=438.941ƒ :85.236ƒ ( 1ƒ     :      ” 6ƒ (6ƒ (1ƒ ( 6   ƒ      (         6   ƒ      (        6ƒ (   41257RYAN M. BLUHMSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone(952) 937-515012701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Fax(952) 937-5822Minnetonka, MN 55343Toll Free(888) 937-5150DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTAN:\0025743.01\DWG\CIVIL\PRELIM\0025743.01S-EXP02.DWG 142PROJECT NUMBER: 0025743.01APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA12/02/20RMBRMBCHF© 2020 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.THE COVEEXISTING CONDITIONSPLAN650 QUAKER AVENUEJORDAN, MINNESOTATHE COVE11/04/2012/02/20JMH LAND DEVELOPMENTN:\0025743.01\DWG\CIVIL\PRELIM\0025743.01S-EXP02.DWG 142PROJECT NUMBER: 0025743.01APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA12/02/20RMBRMBCHF© 2020 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.THE COVEEXISTING CONDITIONSPLAN650 QUAKER AVENUEJORDAN, MINNESOTATHE COVE11/04/20JMH LAND DEVELOPMENTPRELIMINARY PLANSCommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com50.000002'10' OR 5'0'50'100'150'1" = 50'12/02/20....CITY COMMENTS....Parcel 1:All that part of Government Lot 1, Section 24, Township 115, Range 20, described as follows, to-wit:Beginning at a point on the north line of said Section 24, distant 917.90 feet easterly, measured along said line from the north quarter cornerof said Section 24; thence easterly along said north line of said Section 24 to a point which is 1382.05 feet west of the northeast cornerthereof; thence South 37 degrees 34 minutes 46 seconds east (said North line of said Section 24 thruout these courses herein described, havingan assumed bearing of south 90 degrees east) a distance of 133.7 feet; thence south 7 degrees 23 minutes east a distance of 307.64 feet;thence south 82 degrees 22 minutes west to the easterly shore of Farquar Lake; thence northwesterly along the shore of said Lake to the pointof intersection with a line drawn from the point of beginning south 24 degrees west to the shore of said Lake; thence north in a straight line tothe point of beginning.Torrens PropertyTorrens Certificate No. 162022.Parcel 2:All that part of Government Lot 1, Section 24, Township 115, Range 20, described as follows, to-wit:Beginning at a point on the north line of said Section 24, 1382.05 feet west of the northeast corner of said Section 24; thence south 37degrees, 34 minutes, 46 seconds east (said North line of said Section 24 thruout these courses herein described, having an assumed bearing ofSouth 90 degrees east) 133.7 feet; thence south 7 degrees 23 minutes east a distance of 307.64 feet to the place of beginning of the land beingherein described: From said place of beginning proceed south 7 degrees 23 minutes east a distance of 92.36 feet, thence south 41 degrees 15minutes east a distance of 230.0 feet; thence south 46 degrees 08 minutes east a distance of 140.0 feet; thence south 22 degrees 24 minuteseast a distance of 237.7 feet; thence north 76 degrees 52 minutes west to the shore of Farquar lake; thence northwesterly along the shore ofsaid Lake to the point of intersection with a line drawn from the place of beginning of the land being herein described south 82 degrees and22 minutes west to the shore of said Lake; thence north 82 degrees and 22 minutes east to the said place of beginning according to theGovernment Survey thereof.Torrens PropertyTorrens Certificate No. 162023.Parcel 3:That parcel of land located in Government Lot 1, Section 24, Township 115, Range 20, Dakota County, Minnesota lying West of the West right ofway line of S.A.R. No. 33 and East of the following described line:Beginning at a point on the north line of said Government Lot 1, Section 24, said point is 1,382.05 feet west of the Northeast corner of Section24; thence South 37 degrees 34 minutes 46 seconds East (said North line of Government Lot 1 having an assumed bearing of South 90degrees East) a distance of 133.7 feet; thence South 07 degrees 23 minutes East a distance of 400.00 feet; thence South 41 degrees 15 minutesEast a distance of 230.00 feet; thence South 46 degrees 08 minutes East a distance of 140.00 feet; thence South 22 degrees 24 minutes East adistance of 237.70 feet and there terminating.AbstractLEGAL DESCRIPTION (PER TITLE COMMITMENT NO. HB-43904)SOIL BORINGGUY WIREFLARED END SECTIONSANITARY MANHOLECATCH BASINPOWER POLEELECTRIC BOXELECTRIC METERSIGNCABLE TV BOXNATURAL GAS METERSTREET LIGHTMAIL BOXWETLANDSTEEL/WOOD POSTPOWER OVERHEADTELEPHONE UNDERGROUNDTELEPHONE OVERHEADPOWER UNDERGROUNDWATERMAINFIBER OPTICSANITARY SEWERSTORM SEWERGATE VALVEGAS LINECABLE TELEVISION LINEHYDRANTSTORM MANHOLETELEPHONE BOXLEGENDFENCE LINECONCRETE SURFACEBITUMINOUS SURFACEGRAVEL SURFACEFOUND MONUMENT (SEE LABEL)FLAG POLECTVGASPOHPUGSANSTOTOHTUGWATFOSSTEETTVGMAILXEASEMENT LINESECTION LINELOT LINEBOUNDARY LINERIGHT-OF-WAY LINECAST IRON MONUMENT (SEE LABEL)SET MONUMENT (SEE LABEL) S S S S S S S SAN SAN SAN SANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSAN SANSANSANSANSANSAN12312345 67891011121314OUTLOT AOUTLOT BOUTLOT C122OUTLOT B 559161,645 sf6,318 sf5,984 sf4,211 sf10,239 sf172,415 sf545555555555555555552238583055685555555555555510255555446 10210210474 14231 110444595 271823237361 1025719 1021021021021021028510243956519 315±1015210033325664321241102115699190±6,571 sf6,064 sfDIAMOND PATHDIAMOND PATH5,637 sf6,938 sf5,881 sf5,641 sf5,637 sf5,635 sf5,638 sf5,632 sf5,630 sf5,640 sf5,639 sf5,636 sfMAIL181610' BITUMINOUS TRAILCONSERVATION EASEMENTCOMMON AREA(FIRE PIT/BENCH)BLUFF AREA20' BLUFFIMPACT ZONEOWHL PERREHDER & ASSOCEDGE OF WATER; FIELD LOCATED ON 10/21/2020(ELEV = 898.56 (NAVD88)PRIVATE DOCKS75' OHWL SETBACK28B-B28B-BR48EXISTINGSANITARYSEWERLINE EXISTINGSANITARYSEWER LINE32B-B1010110120120LAKE FARQUARWETLAND DELINEATED BYKJOLHAUG ENVIRONMENTALSERVICESRETAINING WALLCOMMON AREA(BEACH)20 FT DRAINAGE &UTILITY EASEMETPER DOC NO.545453PONDINGEASEMENT PER DOCNO. 3063625PONDINGEASEMENT PER DOCNO. 306362420 FT DRAINAGE &UTILITY EASEMENTPER DOC NO.306362320 FT DRAINAGE &UTILITY EASEMETPER DOC NO.306362328B-B28B-B20B-B20B-BR10R20 R26R 1 6 SHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone(952) 937-515012701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Fax(952) 937-5822Minnetonka, MN 55343Toll Free(888) 937-5150DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTAN:\0025743.01\DWG\CIVIL\PRELIM\0025743.01S-SPP01.DWG 143PROJECT NUMBER: 0025743.01APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA12/02/20RMBRMBCHF© 2020 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.THE COVEPRELIMINARY PLAT650 QUAKER AVENUEJORDAN, MINNESOTATHE COVE11/XX/20JMH LAND DEVELOPMENTPRELIMINARY PLANSCommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com50.000019'10' OR 5'0'50'100'150'1" = 50'##########· EXISTING ZONING: R-1; SINGLE FAMILY· SITE GUIDING:LOW DENS. RESIDENTIAL· GROSS SITE AREA: 8.12 AC MAJOR R.O.W. (DIAMOND PATH):0.26 ACEXISTING WETLANDS (ABOVE OHWL)0.04 ACBLUFF AREA: 0.88 AC· NET SITE AREA: 6.89 AC· DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY 55' WIDE VILLA LOTS17 HOMES· PROJECT OPEN SPACE (OUTLOT A, B, C LESS PRIVATE DR): 4.69 AC (57.8%)·· SEE OUTLOT TABLE BELOW· PROJECT DENSITY: GROSS: ±2.09 UN/AC NET: ±2.47 UN/ACMINIMUM LOT AREASITE DEVELOPMENT DATALOT STANDARDS1.ALL LOT DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST FOOT.2.ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT.3.STREET NAMES ARE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE CITY.4.DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED AS REQUIRED. DRAINAGE AND UTILITYEASEMENTS WILL BE PROVIDED OVER ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES AND UP TO 1 FOOT ABOVE THEHIGH WATER LEVEL OF ALL PONDS.5.STREET WIDTHS ARE SHOWN FROM BACK OF CURB TO BACK OF CURB.DEVELOPMENT NOTESAVERAGE LOT AREAMINIMUM LOT WIDTHMINIMUM LOT DEPTHSETBACKSFRONTSIDE INTERIOR LOTSTANDARD55' VILLA HOMES5,630 SF6,131 SF55'100'20' MIN TO BOC7.5'/7.5'; 15' TOTALOUTLOT TABLEOUTLOTAGROSSAREAUSEOWNERSHIPCONSERVATION EASEMENT(TRAIL, BEACH, ANDCOMMON GATHERING AREA)HOA3.96 ACBPRIVATE DRIVE/BUFFERHOA1.42 ACCTRAILHOA0.10 ACTYPICAL 55' VILLA LOT DETAIL10'5'10'7.5'20'5'55'55'100' 100'21DRAINAGE &UTILITY EASEMENTTYPICAL LOTDIMENSIONFRONT BUILDINGSETBACK FROM BOCBUILDINGSETBACKLINELOT NUMBERLOT LINESIDE BUILDINGSETBACKPRIVATE DRIVE; BOCX,XXX SFLOT AREAOHWL /REAR75' MINFRONT LOTLINE1'BELOW OHWL:0.05 ACParcel 1:All that part of Government Lot 1, Section 24, Township 115, Range 20, described as follows, to-wit:Beginning at a point on the north line of said Section 24, distant 917.90 feet easterly, measured along said line from the north quarter cornerof said Section 24; thence easterly along said north line of said Section 24 to a point which is 1382.05 feet west of the northeast cornerthereof; thence South 37 degrees 34 minutes 46 seconds east (said North line of said Section 24 thruout these courses herein described, havingan assumed bearing of south 90 degrees east) a distance of 133.7 feet; thence south 7 degrees 23 minutes east a distance of 307.64 feet;thence south 82 degrees 22 minutes west to the easterly shore of Farquar Lake; thence northwesterly along the shore of said Lake to the pointof intersection with a line drawn from the point of beginning south 24 degrees west to the shore of said Lake; thence north in a straight line tothe point of beginning.Torrens PropertyTorrens Certificate No. 162022.Parcel 2:All that part of Government Lot 1, Section 24, Township 115, Range 20, described as follows, to-wit:Beginning at a point on the north line of said Section 24, 1382.05 feet west of the northeast corner of said Section 24; thence south 37degrees, 34 minutes, 46 seconds east (said North line of said Section 24 thruout these courses herein described, having an assumed bearing ofSouth 90 degrees east) 133.7 feet; thence south 7 degrees 23 minutes east a distance of 307.64 feet to the place of beginning of the land beingherein described: From said place of beginning proceed south 7 degrees 23 minutes east a distance of 92.36 feet, thence south 41 degrees 15minutes east a distance of 230.0 feet; thence south 46 degrees 08 minutes east a distance of 140.0 feet; thence south 22 degrees 24 minuteseast a distance of 237.7 feet; thence north 76 degrees 52 minutes west to the shore of Farquar lake; thence northwesterly along the shore ofsaid Lake to the point of intersection with a line drawn from the place of beginning of the land being herein described south 82 degrees and22 minutes west to the shore of said Lake; thence north 82 degrees and 22 minutes east to the said place of beginning according to theGovernment Survey thereof.Torrens PropertyTorrens Certificate No. 162023.Parcel 3:That parcel of land located in Government Lot 1, Section 24, Township 115, Range 20, Dakota County, Minnesota lying West of the West right ofway line of S.A.R. No. 33 and East of the following described line:Beginning at a point on the north line of said Government Lot 1, Section 24, said point is 1,382.05 feet west of the Northeast corner of Section24; thence South 37 degrees 34 minutes 46 seconds East (said North line of Government Lot 1 having an assumed bearing of South 90degrees East) a distance of 133.7 feet; thence South 07 degrees 23 minutes East a distance of 400.00 feet; thence South 41 degrees 15 minutesEast a distance of 230.00 feet; thence South 46 degrees 08 minutes East a distance of 140.00 feet; thence South 22 degrees 24 minutes East adistance of 237.70 feet and there terminating.AbstractLEGAL DESCRIPTION (PER TITLE COMMITMENT NO. HB-43904)BRENT R. PETERS4412312/02/20· OFF-STREET PARKING: ONE SIDE OF PRIVATE STREET : 34 SPACES 1231234567891011121314OUTLOT AOUTLOT BOUTLOT C122OUTLOT B12 3 456789101111+87.2200+80.22DIAMOND PATHDIAMOND PATHMAIL1816WATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWAT WATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWAT201SS SXXXXX T S S MAIL S S POHGASGASGASGAS POHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHXXXXXXXPOH GASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASSANSANSANSANSANSAN SANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSAN SANSANSANSANSANSAN POH POH12SS5.47%5.50%4.52%4.84%4.18%5.14%6.20%3.51%3.39%3.36%3.53%3.47%4.98%4.20%3.79%31.474.21%8.04%9.31%29.8228.0132.9832.8332.6531.9131.3130.6329.8329.2828.6125.7224.4724.2024.9425.2325.28 927.62 9 1 0920 9049049049069 0 6 9069089 0 8 9089 1 2 9 1 4 9 1 6918 926922922926926 906904908902900900906924926928930928910908 9109109149169189049189 2 6928 930930928932934934936934932930936924926928930932934922924926928930928926930936938940950952954956958960 93092892692492290090290490 4904 93493 49109209 0 2 9 0 4 906908912914916918922924926928RAIN GARDEN 3OUTLET=905.0BOTTOM=903.5HWL=907.2LP923.36HP924.97HP932.82LP926.76LP925.79932.50931.28930.06928.84927.62931.93928.97926.00923.74924.17924.672.97%1.17%2.00%2.00%1.22%1.22%2.00%2.00%FARQUAR LAKEOHWL=899.2RAIN GARDEN 3OUTLET=905.0BOTTOM=903.5HWL=907.2904.50PRETREATMENTRAIN GARDEN 1OUTLET=918.5BOTTOM=917.0HWL=920.9PRETREATMENTRAIN GARDEN 2OUTLET=922.0BOTTOM=920.5HWL=922.3E.O.F.927.50TW=29.0BW=28.0TW=46.0BW=43.0TW=46.0BW=43.0TW=43.0BW=42.0TW=16.0BW=12.0TW=24.0BW=23.0TW=18.0BW=17.0TW=20.0BW=19.0TW=20.0BW=16.0TW=17.0BW=14.0TW=20.0BW=16.0TW=14.0BW=12.0TW=26.0BW=20.0TW=24.0BW=22.0TW=18.0BW=12.0TW=16.0BW=15.0TW=48.0BW=42.0TW=37.0BW=36.0TW=36.0BW=30.0TW=36.0BW=28.0TW=36.0BW=35.0TW=36.0BW=32.0TW=20.0BW=19.0TW=26.0BW=22.0E.O.F.924.12E.O.F.907.20SF SF SF SF S F S FSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSF S FSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSF SHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone(952) 937-515012701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Fax(952) 937-5822Minnetonka, MN 55343Toll Free(888) 937-5150DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAN:\0025743.01\DWG\CIVIL\PRELIM\0025743.01S-GDP02.DWG 144PROJECT NUMBER: 0025743.01APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA12/02/20RMBRMBCHF© 2020 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.THE COVEGRADING & DRAINAGEPLAN650 QUAKER AVENUEJORDAN, MINNESOTATHE COVE11/04/204125712/02/20RYAN M. BLUHMJMH LAND DEVELOPMENTPRELIMINARY PLANSCommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com49.999995'10' OR 5'0'50'100'150'12/02/20....CITY COMMENTS....1.ALL CONTOURS AND SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN TO FINISHED SURFACE/GUTTER GRADESUNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.2.REFER TO THE SITE PLAN/RECORD PLAT FOR MOST CURRENT HORIZONTAL SITE DIMENSIONSAND LAYOUT.3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES ANDTOPOGRAPHICAL FEATURES WITH THE OWNERS AND FIELD-VERIFY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES ORVARIATIONS FROM PLAN.4.ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO LOCAL RULES.5.POSITIVE DRAINAGE FROM THE SITE MUST BE PROVIDED AT ALL TIMES.6.THE OVERALL COMPOSITE CURVE NUMBER (CN) OF THE PROPOSED SITE IS 71.8. THEIMPERVIOUS PERCENTAGE OF THE PROPOSED SITE IS 24.3%.GRADING & DRAINAGE NOTESPROPOSED RETAININGWALL (TYP.)SILT FENCE (TYP.)SILT FENCE (TYP.)PROPOSED RETAININGWALL (TYP.)PROPOSED RETAININGWALL (TYP.)PROPOSED RETAININGWALL (TYP.)PROPOSED RETAININGWALL (TYP.)EXISTINGPROPOSEDGRADING LEGENDPROPERTY LINE982980TOP AND BOTTOM OF RETAINING WALLEMERGENCY OVERFLOWSB-19SOIL BORING LOCATIONSTOSTORM SEWERTREE LINEINDEX CONTOURINTERVAL CONTOUR982980SPOT ELEVATIONPROPOSED GRADESB-19RETAINING WALL (MODULAR BLOCK)GRADING LIMITSGL0.00%900.00900.00TW=XXX.XXBW=XXX.XXE.O.F.HIGH/LOW POINTHP/LP900.00CL-CL ELEVATIONCL-CL900.00PROPOSED STREET PROFILE GRADEX.XX%POND NORMAL WATER LEVELWETLAND LINEWETLAND FILLWETLAND BUFFERPOND ACCESS MAINTENANCE BENCHWETLAND BUFFER LIMITSWETLAND BUFFER MONUMENTDO NOT DISTURBDNDLAKE FARQUARPONDING EASEMENTHWL=901.2LAKE FARQUARPONDING EASEMENTHWL=901.2LAKE FARQUARPONDING EASEMENTHWL=901.2LAKE FARQUARPONDING EASEMENTHWL=901.2 1231234567891011121314OUTLOT AOUTLOT BOUTLOT C122OUTLOT B12 3 456789101111+87.2200+80.22DIAMOND PATHDIAMOND PATHMAIL1816WATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWAT WATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWAT201SS SXXXXX T S S MAIL S S POHGASGASGASGAS POHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHXXXXXXXPOH GASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASSANSANSANSANSANSAN SANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSAN SANSANSANSANSANSAN POH POH12SS5.47%5.50%4.52%4.84%4.18%5.14%6.20%3.51%3.39%3.36%3.53%3.47%4.98%4.20%3.79%31.474.21%8.04%9.31%29.8228.0132.9832.8332.6531.9131.3130.6329.8329.2828.6125.7224.4724.2024.9425.2325.28 927.62 9 1 0920 9049049049069 0 6 9069089 0 8 9089 1 2 9 1 4 9 1 6918 926922922926926 906904908902900900906924926928930928910908 9109109149169189049189 2 6928 930930928932934934936934932930936924926928930932934922924926928930928926930936938940950952954956958960 93092892692492290090290490 4904 93493 49109209 0 2 9 0 4 906908912914916918922924926928RAIN GARDEN 3OUTLET=905.0BOTTOM=903.5HWL=907.2LP923.36HP924.97HP932.82LP926.76LP925.79932.50931.28930.06928.84927.62931.93928.97926.00923.74924.17924.672.97%1.17%2.00%2.00%1.22%1.22%2.00%2.00%FARQUAR LAKEOHWL=899.2RAIN GARDEN 3OUTLET=905.0BOTTOM=903.5HWL=907.2904.50PRETREATMENTRAIN GARDEN 1OUTLET=918.5BOTTOM=917.0HWL=920.9PRETREATMENTRAIN GARDEN 2OUTLET=922.0BOTTOM=920.5HWL=922.3E.O.F.927.50TW=29.0BW=28.0TW=46.0BW=43.0TW=46.0BW=43.0TW=43.0BW=42.0TW=16.0BW=12.0TW=24.0BW=23.0TW=18.0BW=17.0TW=20.0BW=19.0TW=20.0BW=16.0TW=17.0BW=14.0TW=20.0BW=16.0TW=14.0BW=12.0TW=26.0BW=20.0TW=24.0BW=22.0TW=18.0BW=12.0TW=16.0BW=15.0TW=48.0BW=42.0TW=37.0BW=36.0TW=36.0BW=30.0TW=36.0BW=28.0TW=36.0BW=35.0TW=36.0BW=32.0TW=20.0BW=19.0TW=26.0BW=22.0E.O.F.924.12E.O.F.907.20SF SF SF SF S F S FSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSF S FSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSF SHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone(952) 937-515012701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Fax(952) 937-5822Minnetonka, MN 55343Toll Free(888) 937-5150DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAN:\0025743.01\DWG\CIVIL\PRELIM\0025743.01S-GDP02.DWG 145PROJECT NUMBER: 0025743.01APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA12/02/20RMBRMBCHF© 2020 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.THE COVEEROSION CONTROL PLAN650 QUAKER AVENUEJORDAN, MINNESOTATHE COVE11/04/204125712/02/20RYAN M. BLUHMJMH LAND DEVELOPMENTPRELIMINARY PLANSCommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com49.999995'10' OR 5'0'50'100'150'12/02/20....CITY COMMENTS....1.ALL SILT FENCE AND OTHER EROSION CONTROL FEATURES SHALL BE IN-PLACE PRIOR TO ANYEXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL VIABLE TURF OR GROUNDCOVER HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. EXISTING SILT FENCE ON-SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND ORREMOVED AND SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT. IT IS OFEXTREME IMPORTANCE TO BE AWARE OF CURRENT FIELD CONDITIONS WITH RESPECT TOEROSION CONTROL. TEMPORARY PONDING, DIKES, HAY BALES, ETC., REQUIRED BY THE CITYSHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT.2.ALL STREETS DISTURBED DURING WORKING HOURS MUST BE CLEANED AT THE END OF EACHWORKING DAY. A ROCK ENTRANCE TO THE SITE MUST BE PROVIDED ACCORDING TO DETAILSTO REDUCE TRACKING OF DIRT ONTO PUBLIC STREETS.3.REDUNDANT PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROLS ARE NECESSARY WHEN SOIL DISTURBANCE ISWITHIN 50 FEET OF SURFACE WATERS. REDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLS COULD INCLUDE:3.1.TWO ROWS OF SILT FENCE (SEPARATED BY 8 FEET); OR3.2.SILT FENCE AND A TOPSOIL BERM (STABILIZE BERM WITH MULCH); OR3.3.SILT FENCE AND FIBER LOGS; OR3.4.TOPSOIL BERM AND FIBER LOGS (STABILIZE BERM WITH MULCH).4.REDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLS MUST BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO DISTURBING WITHIN 50 FEETOF THE SURFACE WATER.EROSION CONTROL NOTESEROSION CONTROL BLANKET (TYP.)PROPOSED RETAINING WALL (TYP.)SILT FENCE (TYP.)PROPOSED RETAININGWALL (TYP.)EROSION CONTROL BLANKET (TYP.)ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE (TYP.)DUAL SILTFENCE (TYP.)EROSION CONTROL BLANKET (TYP.)DUAL SILTFENCE (TYP.)PROPERTY LINEEXISTINGPROPOSEDINDEX CONTOURINTERVAL CONTOUREROSION CONTROL LEGEND982980982980SILT FENCESFSTOSTORM SEWERTREE PROTECTION FENCETREE LINERETAINING WALL (MODULAR BLOCK)GRADING LIMITSGLROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEEROSION CONTROL BLANKETTURF REINFORCEMENT MATPOND NORMAL WATER LEVELSILT FENCE-POST GRADINGPOST-SFHEAVY DUTY SILT FENCEHDSFREDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLRSCINLET PROTECTIONEROSION CONTROL CHECKS/BIOROLLSEMERGENCY OVERFLOWE.O.F.WETLAND LINEWETLAND FILLWETLAND BUFFERPOND ACCESS MAINTENANCE BENCHWETLAND BUFFER LIMITSWETLAND BUFFER MONUMENTDO NOT DISTURBDNDINLET SEDIMENTCONTROL (TYP)INLET SEDIMENTCONTROL (TYP) 1231234567891011121314OUTLOT AOUTLOT BOUTLOT C122OUTLOT B12 3 456789101111+87.2200+80.22DIAMOND PATHDIAMOND PATHMAIL1816WATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWAT WATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWAT201SS SXXXXX T S S MAIL S S POHGASGASGASGAS POHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHXXXXXXXPOH GASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASSANSANSANSANSANSAN SANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSAN SANSANSANSANSANSAN POH POH12 RAIN GARDEN 3OUTLET=905.0BOTTOM=903.5HWL=907.2FARQUAR LAKEOHWL=899.2RAIN GARDEN 3OUTLET=905.0BOTTOM=903.5HWL=907.2PRETREATMENTRAIN GARDEN 1OUTLET=918.5BOTTOM=917.0HWL=920.9PRETREATMENTRAIN GARDEN 2OUTLET=922.0BOTTOM=920.5HWL=922.3CONNECT TO EXISTINGSANITARY SEWER8" WATERMAINHYDRANT (TYP.)CONNECT TO EXISTINGWATERMAINEX MHRE=921.4IE=914.0EX MHRE=902.8IE W=897.0IE=896.8EX MHRE=903.5IE=897.9EX MHRE=900.3IE=896.3EX MHRE=899.3IE=895.2EX MHRE=900.0IE=894.5EX MHRE=900.3IE=894.0SS MH-5RE=932.76IE=S 913.24IE=N 913.14DEPTH=19.62MH-4RE=927.77IE=N 915.77DEPTH=12.00MH-7RE=927.15IE=S 912.25IE=NW 912.15DEPTH=15.00MH-1RE=924.69IE=SE 912.69DEPTH=12.00MH-9RE=924.25IE=SE 911.74IE=NW 911.64DEPTH=12.618" SANITARY SEWER8" SANITARY SEWER8" WATERMAINCONNECT TO EXISTINGWATERMAINCB-12RE=925.00IE=921.50 (W)CBMH-11RE=925.76IE=920.00 (E)IE=912.00 (W)SUMP=909.00WITH SAFL BAFFLESTMH-4RE=924.06IE=913.70 (NE)IE=913.70 (SW)SUMP=910.70WITH SAFL BAFFLECB-6RE=922.00IE=918.00 (E)CBMH-5RE=918.50IE=914.50 (W)IE=914.50 (SW)STMH-9RE=910.05IE=905.78 (SE)IE=905.78 (N)STMH-10RE=909.98IE=906.00 (E)IE=906.00 (NW)STMH-2RE=910.69IE=905.60 (NE)IE=905.26 (W)IE=905.10 (S)15" FES-14.8 CU YD CLASS III RIPRAPIE=905.0015" FES-74.8 CU YD CLASS III RIPRAPIE=905.00CB-3RE=909.50IE=905.50 (E)OCS-14RE=905.00IE=901.00 (W)56 LF-18" RCPCL 5 @ 1.44%128 LF-18" RCPCL 5 @ 6.31%19 LF-24" RCPCL 3 @ 0.52%85 LF-12" RCPCL 5 @ 1.77%60 LF-12" RCPCL 5 @ 10.00%56 LF-21" RCPCL 4 @ 1.78%36 LF-15" RCPCL 5 @ 0.62%63 LF-12" RCPCL 5 @ 5.56%46 LF-12" RCPCL 5 @ 0.52%128 LF-18" RCP CL 5 @ 0 .27%18 LF-18" RCPCL 5 @ 0.55%SSMH-2RE=923.54IE=909.98 (NW)IE=909.98 (SE)IE=909.88 (NE)IE=909.88 (SW)SHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone(952) 937-515012701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Fax(952) 937-5822Minnetonka, MN 55343Toll Free(888) 937-5150DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAN:\0025743.01\DWG\CIVIL\PRELIM\0025743.01S-UTP02.DWG 146PROJECT NUMBER: 0025743.01APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA12/02/20RMBRMBCHF© 2020 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.THE COVEUTILITY PLAN650 QUAKER AVENUEJORDAN, MINNESOTATHE COVE11/04/204125712/02/20RYAN M. BLUHMJMH LAND DEVELOPMENTPRELIMINARY PLANSCommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com49.999995'10' OR 5'0'50'100'150'12/02/20....CITY COMMENTS....SANEXISTINGPROPOSEDSANITARY SEWERSTOSTORM SEWERWATWATER MAINWATHYDRANTDRAIN TILEUTILITY LEGEND1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ANDNOTIFY THE OWNER OF ANY DIFFERENCES.2.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL MATERIALS, CONST. TECHNIQUES AND TESTING SHALLCONFORM TO THE 2013 ED. OF THE "STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAINAND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION AND SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION BYTHE CITY ENGINEERING ASSOCIATION OF MINN." AND TO THE "STANDARD SPECIFICATION FORHIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION" MINN. DEPT. OF TRANS., AUGUST 31, 2016 INCLUDING THECURRENT ADDENDUM. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO FOLLOW ALL PROCEDURESAS OUTLINED BY THE LOCAL AGENCY.3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RECEIVE THE NECESSARY PERMITS FOR ALL WORK OUTSIDE OF THEPROPERTY LIMITS.4.VERIFY EXISTING INVERT LOCATION & ELEVATION PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION.5.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" FOR FOR UTILITY LOCATIONSPRIOR TO UTILITY INSTALLATION.GENERAL UTILITY NOTESSDTOHWL=899.2OHWL=899.2OHWL=899.2OHWL=899.2EDGE OF WATEREDGE OF WATEREDGE OF WATEREDGE OF WATEREDGE OF WATEREDGE OF WETLANDEDGE OF WETLANDEDGE OF WETLAND75' OHWLSETBACK75' OHWLSETBACK75' OHWLSETBACK Street 19109159209259309359409459109159209259309359409450123456789101112Street 2925930935940945950925930935940945950012917.7923.49923.0924.08923.9924.63926.0924.68918.9924.17917.6923.64914.0923.73 917.8 924.55 918.2 925.97 920.0 927.46 919.0 928.95 918.7 930.43 921.8 931.92 933.2 932.78 939.9 932.50 939.0 931.89 935.0 931.28 933.3 930.67 931.2 930.06 933.0 929.45 934.0 928.84 934.0 928.23 933.6 927.62 933.0 927.01 935.6932.81938.2935.11 1.17%-1.17%2.97%-1.22%PVI STA = -0+00.05PVI ELEV = 923.49 PVI STA = 11+87.22 PVI ELEV = 926.56 L.P ELEV = 923.59L.P. STA = 2+69.37PVI STA = 3+00.00PVI ELEV = 923.00A.D. = 4.14%K = 33.92140.48' VCPVC = 2+29.76ELEV = 923.82 PVT = 3+70.24 ELEV = 925.09 H.P ELEV = 924.74H.P. STA = 1+28.84PVI STA = 1+28.75PVI ELEV = 925.00A.D. = -2.34%K = 38.4690.00' VCPVC = 0+83.75ELEV = 924.47PVT = 1+73.75ELEV = 924.47 H.P ELEV = 932.81H.P. STA = 6+61.82PVI STA = 6+43.00PVI ELEV = 933.20A.D. = -4.19%K = 21.4690.00' VCPVC = 5+98.00ELEV = 931.86PVT = 6+88.00ELEV = 932.654.60%PVI STA = 0+00.00PVI ELEV = 932.81PVI STA = 0+80.22PVI ELEV = 936.50 SHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone(952) 937-515012701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Fax(952) 937-5822Minnetonka, MN 55343Toll Free(888) 937-5150DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAN:\0025743.01\DWG\CIVIL\PRELIM\0025743.01S-DTP02.DWG 149PROJECT NUMBER: 0025743.01APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA12/02/20RMBRMBCHF© 2020 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.THE COVEPROFILES650 QUAKER AVENUEJORDAN, MINNESOTATHE COVE11/04/204125712/02/20RYAN M. BLUHMJMH LAND DEVELOPMENT###### OR ##12/02/20....CITY COMMENTS.... SS 934936934932930936924926928930932 934922936938940950952954956958960 93092892692492290090290490 4904 93493 49109209 0 2 9 0 4 9069089129149169189229249269281231234567891011121314OUTLOT AOUTLOT BOUTLOT C122OUTLOT B DIAMOND PATHDIAMOND PATHMAIL1816121011891680160116081212124015491598160017091910234823491628175619522022177217591196129413541365139315021956219523272330233923422413245024842497252125402575152315671573164316511663186718681878188118861898193016201515177322271209193515411558191819632403241717152332198923532011246613501379150323312359242124982499250125182531253625841519154715651580163416351683188218881889187918801896150918421293256817451746158115842002200313711262159216792372248717442025234412961302130613371356135813591377149915041535190019542340235723752385239824642506251325352560156216231638164416691713186918831884188518871987199013721208154015752021134013631375138014701516232523822574167016871723194413921517200020052337176317642181123912611969235213031304135513821396195724112412248125342538256625731605166417141839184018971942198812691389184817652004174012951301130513381394246325591554163618931962198018641621122123362383223113521357136213741951239424452493193616741678168919841993124119271395239017671616169817161870136113842392134213971514195815271576194119431955198115851645172919781583133924942512187218731297138113881928251018952424150018381863223022131681150723552503250416071748168815242172149715011613249118461974139121681926129223872553199421831922150619341184165218992228238824142467194917391865196020171217185022291891138716471508151015291531154616391675173819151968199823691961200715681976198624022405245825412550256419951560156115691586158815901591159315941597159916581659169516961697171017111712238424542456138313981992202623502448253725542561197711861202120312472347129013641378138515201525168516861703235823612362236323742410241524292446251525162517251925232526253325392542254425472549255625702571257625431606164216601665166618901953222611881677153813091544154519161999196419171966200815121564256517281530155715891596162616612460248825461373155115951735187619331946198523432360255220121252240924231351135313861472149215631604167618662329233823412356242724282478250025092514252025221552161916221624172618741875187718942418164118711701172712771211252416992033218016932001176217601757175217662032225622552472247422522251247524082351234623451684232624062400239924041682238624622451243624572567170025552447244415392455237725072505246824892479242024162426242516621640161215321724172515531574157115781579183416251649DIAMOND PATHWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWAT WATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATS S SXXXXX T S S MAIL S S POHGASGASGASGAS POHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHXXXXXXXPOH GASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSAN SANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSAN SANSANSANSANSANSAN POH POH SHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone(952) 937-515012701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Fax(952) 937-5822Minnetonka, MN 55343Toll Free(888) 937-5150DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAN:\0025743.01\DWG\CIVIL\PRELIM\0025743.01S-TPP02.DWG 1410PROJECT NUMBER: 0025743.01APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA12/02/20RMBRMBCHF© 2020 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.THE COVETREE PRESERVATIONPLAN650 QUAKER AVENUEJORDAN, MINNESOTATHE COVE11/04/20JMH LAND DEVELOPMENT12/02/2053774NICHOLAS T. MEYERPRELIMINARY PLANSCommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com50.000001'10' OR 5'0'50'100'150'1" = 50'12/02/20....CITY COMMENTS....Tree Preservation RequirementsSIGNIFICANT TREE :ANY HEALTHY DECIDUOUS TREE MEASURING 8 INCHES OR GREATER IN DIAMETER, ORANY CONIFEROUS TREE MEASURING 6 INCHES OR GREATER IN DIAMETER.TREE REMOVAL & REPLACEMENT:FOR ALL PROJECTS INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO SUBDIVISION GRADING, 10% OF THETOTAL NUMBER OF DIAMETER INCHES OF SIGNIFICANT TREES REMOVED MUST BEREPLACED WITH CALIPER INCHES WITH THE SUBDIVISION. TREES REPLACED UNDER THISREQUIREMENT MAY BE USED TO SATISFY PART OF ANY LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTSUNDER THIS CODE.REPLACEMENT TREES:-NO MORE THAN 13 OF THE REPLACEMENT TREES SHALL BE THE SAME SPECIES.-DECIDUOUS TREES SHALL BE NO LESS THAN 2 CAL. INCHES-CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL BE NO LESS THAN 6 FEET HIGH. LegendEXISTING TREE TO REMAINEXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVEDTree Protection Detail" T " POST OR EQUAL6' MAX.ORANGE MESH CONSTRUCTION FENCELOCATION AS SHOWN ON PLAN. MAINTAINMAXIMUM DISTANCE FROM TRUNK POSSIBLE.ORANGE CONSTRUCTION FENCESTAKED EVERY 6'1. PRUNING WILL BE DONE BY PROFESSIONALS DURING APPROPRIATE PRUNING SEASON.2.NO STORAGE OF MATERIALS, OPERATION OF MACHINERY, OR DEVELOPMENT OF ANY SORT WILL OCCURWITHIN THE FENCE-LINE WITHOUT APPROVAL IN WRITING FROM THE CITY.3.SITE GRADING TO BE DONE ONLY AFTER PROTECTIVE MEASURES HAVE BEEN TAKEN, CITY HAS APPROVEDFENCING LOCATIONS, AND ALL CONTRACTORS HAVE BEEN BRIEFED ON TREE PRESERVATION TECHNIQUES.LAS T REV ISE D: 05/28 /15TREE PROTECTIONTP08NOTES:PLANELEVATIONDRIPLINE6' METAL FENCE POST. STAKE EVERY 6'MAXIMUM.NOTE: TREE SURVEY DATA COMPLETED BYREHDER & ASSOCIATES. JANUARY 2017Tree Replacement Calculations SHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone(952) 937-515012701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Fax(952) 937-5822Minnetonka, MN 55343Toll Free(888) 937-5150DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAN:\0025743.01\DWG\CIVIL\PRELIM\0025743.01S-TPP02.DWG 1411PROJECT NUMBER: 0025743.01APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA12/02/20RMBRMBCHF© 2020 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.THE COVETREE INVENTORY650 QUAKER AVENUEJORDAN, MINNESOTATHE COVE11/04/20JMH LAND DEVELOPMENT12/02/2053774NICHOLAS T. MEYERCommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com############# OR ##12/02/20....CITY COMMENTS.... SHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone(952) 937-515012701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Fax(952) 937-5822Minnetonka, MN 55343Toll Free(888) 937-5150DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAN:\0025743.01\DWG\CIVIL\PRELIM\0025743.01S-TPP02.DWG 1412PROJECT NUMBER: 0025743.01APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA12/02/20RMBRMBCHF© 2020 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.THE COVETREE INVENTORY650 QUAKER AVENUEJORDAN, MINNESOTATHE COVE11/04/20JMH LAND DEVELOPMENT12/02/2053774NICHOLAS T. MEYERCommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com############# OR ##12/02/20....CITY COMMENTS.... DIAMOND PATHWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWAT WATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATS S SXXXXX T S S S S POHGASGASGASGAS POHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHXXXXXXXPOH GASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSAN SANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSAN SANSANSANSANSANSAN POH POH 934936934932930936924926928930932 934922936938940950952954956958960 93092892692492290090290490 4904 93493 49109209 0 2 9 0 4 9069089129149169189229249269285-ACE4-SGM2-QUA3-NOS1-CCF2-TCH1-TCH3-BHS4-PFC6-ACE2-BHS1-TCH3-CCF2-NOS2-TCH1-NOS1-TCH4-NOS2-SKH4-ABS1-BVL*2-FFM*2-REO4-BUO1-HAK3-WHO3-WHP4-WHP7-FFM*7-BVL*5-SGM1-CCF4-ABS3-BHS2-BHS3-RVB1-WSB1-SKH2-NWM3-SGM2-SWO3-KEC2-REO4-WHO3-NWM1-HAK3-RVB3-HAK3-VFE3-NWM3-QUA3-REL1-VFE4-RVB3-VFE2-REO3-NOP1-NWM3-WSB2-CCF3-SWO2-SGM1-SWO3-REL2-KEC3-WHO1-KEC3-VFE3-BUO1-NWM3-BBC2-BBCSS1231 234567891011121314OUTLOT AOUTLOT BOUTLOT C122OUTLOT B DIAMOND PATHDIAMOND PATHMAIL1816SHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone(952) 937-515012701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Fax(952) 937-5822Minnetonka, MN 55343Toll Free(888) 937-5150DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAN:\0025743.01\DWG\CIVIL\PRELIM\0025743.01S-PLP02.DWG 1413PROJECT NUMBER: 0025743.01APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA12/02/20RMBRMBCHF© 2020 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.THE COVEPRELIMINARYLANDSCAPE PLAN650 QUAKER AVENUEJORDAN, MINNESOTATHE COVE11/04/20JMH LAND DEVELOPMENT12/02/2053774NICHOLAS T. MEYERPRELIMINARY PLANSCommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com50.000001'10' OR 5'0'50'100'150'1" = 50'12/02/20....CITY COMMENTS....Preliminary Plant ScheduleCOMMON/BOTANICAL NAMEQTY.SIZEMATURE SIZE3" BB10' HT., BBNOTES:- QUANTITIES ON PLAN SUPERSEDE LIST QUANTITIES IN THE EVENT OF A DISCREPANCY.- REFER TO FINAL LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR SPECIES LOCATIONS AND QUANTITIES.10' HT., BB10' HT., BBLandscape RequirementsTOTAL LANDSCAPE REQUIRED: 17 TREES*1 STREET TREE PER LOT (17 VILLA LOTS): 17 TREES*OVERSTORY DECIDUOUS STREET TREES (3 CAL. IN.): 51.0 CAL. IN. 17 TREES*OVERSTORY DECIDUOUS TREES (2.5 CAL. IN.): 272.5 CAL. IN. 109 TREES*CONIFEROUS TREES (4 CAL. IN.): 148.0 CAL. IN. 37 TREES*ORNAMENTAL DECIDUOUS TREES (2 CAL. IN.): 58.0 CAL. IN. 29 TREESLandscape ProvisionsNative Seeding LegendSTORMWATER SOUTH & WESTNATIVE SEED MIX MNDOT (33-261)TOTAL AREA (0.2 AC)* ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDED UNLESS NOTEDOTHERWISEMESIC PRAIRIE GENERALSEED MIX MNDOT (35-241)TOTAL AREA (1.2 AC)SITE LANDSCAPING PROVIDED: 529.5 CAL. IN. 192 TREES NOTES:1.STREET TREE LOCATIONS AND SPACING ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ONCONSTRUCTED DRIVEWAY AND UTILITY LOCATIONS.2.STREET TREES SHALL BE PLANTED 8' FROM BACK OF CURB, IN A LOCATION THAT DOESNOT INTERFERE WITH CURBSTOPS OR INDIVIDUAL SEWER & WATER CONNECTIONS.3.NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEENCOMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA.Norway Pine / Pinus resinosaBur Oak / Quercus macrocarpaRed Oak / Quercus rubraSwamp White Oak / Quercus bicolorRedmond Linden / Tilia americana 'Redmond'Valley Forge Elm / Ulmus americana 'St. Croix'Sienna Glen Maple / Acer x freemanii 'Sienna'Skyline Honeylocust / Gleditsia tricanthos var. inermis 'Skycole'Kentucky Decaf Coffeetree / Gymnocladus dioica 'McKBranched' Hackberry / Celtis occidentalisWhite Pine / Pinus strobusFall Fiesta Maple / Acer saccharum 'Bailsta'2.5" BB2.5" BB2.5" BB2.5" BB2.5" BB2.5" BB2.5" BB2.5" BBSPACING O.C.AS SHOWNAS SHOWNAS SHOWNAS SHOWNAS SHOWNAS SHOWNAS SHOWNAS SHOWNAS SHOWNAS SHOWNAS SHOWNAS SHOWNAS SHOWN6' HT., BBAS SHOWNWhitespire Birch / Betula populifolia 'Whitespire'AS SHOWN2" BBThornless Cockspur Hawthorn / Crataegus crusgalli 'Inermis'AS SHOWNQuaking Aspen / Populus tremuloidesAS SHOWNPrairifire Crab / Malus 'Prairifire'AS SHOWN2" BB2" BBH 15'-25' W 15'-25'H 30'-35' W 30'H 15'-20' W 15'-20'H 40'-60' W 20'-30'H 50'-80' W 30'-40'H 20' W 20'H 70' W 70'H 50'-60' W 40'-50'H 40'-50' W 35'-40'H 60'-80' W 40'-50'H 60'-80' W 60'-80'H 50' W 35'-40'H 50' W 30'H 50'-75' W 50'H 40'-60' W 30'-40'H 50'-75' W 50'H 60'-80' W 25'-30'River Birch / Betula nigraAS SHOWNH 40'-60' W 30'-40'Northwood Maple / Acer rubrum 'Northwood'2.5" BBAS SHOWNH 50' W 35'10' HT., BBOVERSTORY DECIDUOUS TREES - 125EVERGREEN TREES - 37ORNAMENTAL TREES - 29H 40'-50' W 15'-30'Concolor Fir / Abies concolorTree Replacement RequirementsTOTAL REPLACEMENT REQUIRED: 529 CAL. IN. 212 TREES*NUMBER OF REPLACEMENT TREES IS BASEDUPON 2.5 CAL. IN. TREES FOR REPLACEMENT*REPLACEMENT TREES COUNT TOWARDS ANY LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS*SEE TREE PRESERVATION PLANS FOR FULL CALCULATIONS. OVERSTORY DECIDUOUS TREESEVERGREEN TREESOVERSTORY DECIDUOUS STREET TREESBlack Hills Spruce / Picea glauca densataNorway Spruce / Picea abiesAS SHOWNAS SHOWNH 30'-40' W 20'-30'H 60'-80' W 25'-30'STRAIGHT SINGLE LEADERBHSNOS10103" BBBoulevard Linden / Tilia americana 'Boulevard'AS SHOWNH 50'-60' W 25'-30'STRAIGHT SINGLE LEADERSTRAIGHT SINGLE LEADER11ACESTRAIGHT SINGLE LEADERAccolade Elm / Ulmus japonica x wilsoniana 'Morton'AS SHOWNH 70' W 40'-50'Autumn Brilliance Serviceberry / Amelanchier x grandifloraCYPRESS WOOD MULCH(RAIN GARDENS)ORNAMENTAL TREES6FFM*SGMNWMREO914104SKH7BUO5SWOVFERELHAK61066KEC10RVB4TCHWSBABSPFC7485QUACODE7WHP7CCF3NOPPlanting LegendBVL*8 White Oak / Quercus alba2.5" BBAS SHOWNH 60'-80' W 60'-80'WHO102.5" BB2.5" BB2.5" BB10' HT., BB10' HT., BBSTRAIGHT SINGLE LEADERSTRAIGHT SINGLE LEADERSTRAIGHT SINGLE LEADERSTRAIGHT SINGLE LEADERSTRAIGHT SINGLE LEADERSTRAIGHT SINGLE LEADERSTRAIGHT SINGLE LEADERSTRAIGHT SINGLE LEADERSTRAIGHT SINGLE LEADERSTRAIGHT SINGLE LEADERSTRAIGHT SINGLE LEADERSTRAIGHT SINGLE LEADERSTRAIGHT SINGLE LEADERSTRAIGHT SINGLE LEADERSTRAIGHT SINGLE LEADERSTRAIGHT SINGLE LEADERSTRAIGHT SINGLE LEADERSTRAIGHT SINGLE LEADERSTRAIGHT SINGLE LEADER3-5 STEM CLUMP3-5 STEM CLUMPBlue Beech / Carpinus carolinianaAS SHOWN2" BBH 20'-30' W 30'5BBCSTRAIGHT SINGLE LEADER DIAMOND PATHDIAMOND PATHMAIL1816934936934932930936924926928930932934922924926928930928926930936938940950952954956958960 93092892692492290090290490 4904 93493 49109209 0 2 9 0 4 906908912914916918922924926928N:\0025743.01\DWG\CIVIL\EXHIBIT\0025743.01C-XB1.DWG PROJECT NUMBER: 0025743.01APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA11/09/20...© 2017 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.THE COVESHORELAND IMPACTZONE EXHIBITJMH LAND DEVELOPMENTNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone(952) 937-515012701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Fax(952) 937-5822Minnetonka, MN 55343Toll Free(888) 937-5150DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTACommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com50'10' OR 5'0'50'100'150'1" = 50'1UNDISTURBED OPEN SPACE - 0.66 ACRES (71.7%)DISTURBED AND RESTORED OPEN SPACE - 0.21 ACRES (22.8%)DISTURBED AMENITY AREA - 0.03 ACRES (3.3%)DISTURBED OPEN SPACE AREAS WILL BE RESTORED WITHA MINIMUM OF 6" OF TOPSOIL AND NATIVE SEEDING PERLANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS.73.9% OF THE SHORE IMPACT ZONE WILL NOT BEDISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION.94.5% OF THE SHORE IMPACT ZONE WILL REMAIN OPENSPACE.75' STRUCTURESETBACK37.5' SHOREIMPACT ZONE75' STRUCTURESETBACK37.5' SHOREIMPACT ZONE75' STRUCTURESETBACK37.5' SHOREIMPACT ZONETOTAL SHORE IMPACT ZONE - 0.92 ACRESUNDISTURBED AMENITY AREA - 0.02 ACRES (2.2%) CONCEPT PLANS ONLY. SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE. OPTIONAL ITEMS MAY BE SHOWN FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY. REFER TO BUILDER SPECS FOR STANDARD OR INCLUDED FEATURES.COPYRIGHT: DAVID CHARLEZ DESIGNS 201617645 JUNIPER PATH SUITE #215LAKEVILLE, MN 55044TEL: 952.428.8200EM: Dave@DavidCharlezDesigns.comBUILDERC0Custom One Homes6939 Pine Arbor Drive S.Suite #100Cottage Grove, MN 55016The Villas of Hidden Valley - Lot 1Cottage Grove, MNVilla Elevation CTitle 11' x 11'bdrm #216' x 14'DECKGREAT RMVAULTED11' x 11'KITCHEN4-SEASONPORCH13' x 15'OWNER'S SUITEPANTRYL'DRYBATHMUD RMW.I.C.VAULTED11' x 11'DININGVAULTED14.5' x 15'VAULTED8' x 9'FOYER12' x 12'8.5' x 6'6.5' x 6.5'19' x 23.5'GARAGEBATH5.5' x 10'W.I.C.LINE OF RIDGEVAULTLIN.STORAGEMECHANICALBDRM #4BATH10.5' x 12'6.5' x 10.5'-UNEXCAVATED-FAMILY RM16' x 17.5'-UNEX-LINENWET BARGAME RM11' x 17.5'CONCEPT PLANS ONLY. SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE. OPTIONAL ITEMS MAY BE SHOWN FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY. REFER TO BUILDER SPECS FOR STANDARD OR INCLUDED FEATURES.COPYRIGHT: DAVID CHARLEZ DESIGNS 201617645 JUNIPER PATH SUITE #215LAKEVILLE, MN 55044TEL: 952.428.8200EM: Dave@DavidCharlezDesigns.comBUILDERC1Custom One Homes6939 Pine Arbor Drive S.Suite #100Cottage Grove, MN 55016The Villas of Hidden Valley - Lot 1Cottage Grove, MNVilla Elevation CMainLevelm a i n l e v e lm a i n l e v e lm a i n l e v e lm a i n l e v e lL O W E R l e v e lL O W E R l e v e lL O W E R l e v e lL O W E R l e v e l 168 SFDECK (OPT)144 SFPORCH (OPT)472 SFGARAGE1584 SFMAIN LEVEL64 SFSTOOP906 SFLOWER LEVEL474 SFSTORAGE115 SFMECHCONCEPT PLANS ONLY. SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE. OPTIONAL ITEMS MAY BE SHOWN FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY. REFER TO BUILDER SPECS FOR STANDARD OR INCLUDED FEATURES.COPYRIGHT: DAVID CHARLEZ DESIGNS 201617645 JUNIPER PATH SUITE #215LAKEVILLE, MN 55044TEL: 952.428.8200EM: Dave@DavidCharlezDesigns.comBUILDERC2Custom One Homes6939 Pine Arbor Drive S.Suite #100Cottage Grove, MN 55016The Villas of Hidden Valley - Lot 1Cottage Grove, MNVilla Elevation CSquareFootageLOWER LEVEL:MAIN LEVEL:FINISHED TOTAL:SQUARE FOOTAGECALCULATIONS906 SQ. FT. LOWER LEVEL115 SQ. FT. MECHANICAL ROOM474 SQ. FT. STORAGE1584 SQ. FT. MAIN LEVEL472 SQ. FT. GARAGE168 SQ. FT. DECK144 SQ. FT. 4-SEASON PORCH64 SQ. FT. FRONT STOOP2490 SQ. FT. FINISHED TOTALm a i n l e v e lm a i n l e v e lm a i n l e v e lm a i n l e v e lL O W E R l e v e lL O W E R l e v e lL O W E R l e v e lL O W E R l e v e l CONCEPT PLANS ONLY. SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE. OPTIONAL ITEMS MAY BE SHOWN FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY. REFER TO BUILDER SPECS FOR STANDARD OR INCLUDED FEATURES. COPYRIGHT: DAVID CHARLEZ DESIGNS 2016 17645 JUNIPER PATH SUITE #215 LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 TEL: 952.428.8200 EM: Dave@DavidCharlezDesigns.com BUILDER C0Custom One Homes 6939 Pine Arbor Drive S. Suite #100 Cottage Grove, MN 55016 Custom One Homes Cottage Grove, MN Villa Elevation D Title CARPET 11' x 11' bdrm #2 14' x 14' DECK (OPT) GREAT RM WOOD VAULTED 11' x 11' KITCHEN 4-SEASON PORCH (OPT) CARPET 13' x 15' OWNER'S SUITE WOOD PANTRY L'DRY BATH MUD RM W.I.C. WOOD VAULTED 11' x 11' DINING WOOD VAULTED 14.5' x 15.5' WOOD 8' x 9' FOYER 11' x 11.5' LVT 8.5' x 6'LVT 6.5' x 6.5' 19' x 29.5' GARAGE BATH LVT 5' x 11' CARPET TILE 5.5' x 10' W.I.C. LVT LINE OF RIDGE VAULT CONCRETE STORAGE CONCRETE MECHANICAL BDRM #4 BATH CARPET 10.5' x 12' LVT 6.5' x 10.5' -UNEXCAVATED- FAMILY RM CARPET 16' x 17.5' BDRM #3 CARPET 10.5' x 12' W.I.C. CARPET -UNEX- LINEN CONCEPT PLANS ONLY. SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE. OPTIONAL ITEMS MAY BE SHOWN FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY. REFER TO BUILDER SPECS FOR STANDARD OR INCLUDED FEATURES. COPYRIGHT: DAVID CHARLEZ DESIGNS 2016 17645 JUNIPER PATH SUITE #215 LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 TEL: 952.428.8200 EM: Dave@DavidCharlezDesigns.com BUILDER C1Custom One Homes 6939 Pine Arbor Drive S. Suite #100 Cottage Grove, MN 55016 Custom One Homes Cottage Grove, MN Villa Elevation D Main Level m a i n l e v e lL O W E R l e v e l l o w e r l e v e l 860 SQ. FT. m e c h 139 SQ. FT. s t o r a g e 496 SQ. FT. m a i n L E V E L 1584 SQ. FT. d e c k (opt) 195 SQ. FT. p o r c h (opt) 144 SQ. FT. g a r a g e 592 SQ. FT. s t o o p 62 SQ. FT. CONCEPT PLANS ONLY. SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE. OPTIONAL ITEMS MAY BE SHOWN FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY. REFER TO BUILDER SPECS FOR STANDARD OR INCLUDED FEATURES. COPYRIGHT: DAVID CHARLEZ DESIGNS 2016 17645 JUNIPER PATH SUITE #215 LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 TEL: 952.428.8200 EM: Dave@DavidCharlezDesigns.com BUILDER C2Custom One Homes 6939 Pine Arbor Drive S. Suite #100 Cottage Grove, MN 55016 Custom One Homes Cottage Grove, MN Villa Elevation D Square Footage LOWER LEVEL: MAIN LEVEL: FINISHED TOTAL: SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONS 860 SQ. FT. LOWER LEVEL 139 SQ. FT. MECHANICAL ROOM 496 SQ. FT. STORAGE 1584 SQ. FT. MAIN LEVEL 592 SQ. FT. GARAGE 195 SQ. FT. DECK (OPT) 144 SQ. FT. 4-SEASON PORCH (OPT) 62 SQ. FT. FRONT STOOP 2444 SQ. FT. FINISHED TOTAL First Floor 0' -0" T.O. Footing -10' -2 1/4" Top of Foundation -0' -2 1/4" First Floor Clg. 9' -1 1/8" A D B 5/4 x 6 TRIM Lower Level @ Hdr Hgt86"Main Level @ Hdr Hgt96"5/4 x 8 TRIM BOARD5/4 x 6 FRIEZE BD.Roof Peak 22' -0 3/4" 5/4 x 6 TRIM BOARD B 5/4 x 6 w/2 x 2 STEPPED TRIM BD. 12' - 11 5/8"9' - 1 1/8"0' - 2 1/4"10' - 0"4" HARDIE CORNER BD.WINDOW TRIM CONSTRUCTION: 5/4 x 4 TOP/BOTTOM HORIZONTAL 5/4 x 4 VERTICAL DOOR TRIM CONSTRUCTION: 5/4 x 4 TOP HORIZONTAL 5/4 x 4 VERTICAL 2)2620 FX BEAM PER MFG. SPEC @ 17'-0" FROM T.O.F. A D 5/4 x 6 TRIM BOARD 5/4 x 6 TRIM BD. 83"5/4 x 6 FRIEZE BD.5/4 x 6 FRIEZE BD.CORBEL #1 BRACKET C C 2 1/4" STONE CAP C 4/4 x 12 SKIRT BOARD4" VINYL CORNER BD.C C 4" VINYL CORNER BD.4" VINYL CORNER BD.5/4" x 6" TRIM BOARD5/4" x 6" FRIEZE BD.ENGINEERING ROOF TRUSSES PER MFG. SPEC. MANUFACTURE WILL PROVIDE ALL ENGINEERING DRAWING AND SPECIFICS OVERHANG DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF FRAMING ICE AND WATER ALL ADJOINING ROOFS NOTE: RIDGE VENT 12" / 12" 12" / 12" 24"12"24"24"24" 24"12"24"12"24"24" 30"30" 36"36"101 1/2"84"36"36"24"29 1/2"6"6"18"6" / 12"12" / 12"12" / 12"6" / 12"4" / 12"12" / 12"2" / 12"7 1/4"7 1/4"6"3 3/4"3 1/2"7 1/4"SIDE VIEW:FRONT VIEW: CUSTOM CORBEL #1 3 1/2"3 1/2"3 3/4" custom bracket SIDE VIEW FRONT VIEW 21"30"5 1/2"24 1/2"3"1 1/2"1 1/2"19"3 1/2" 2 1/2" 3 1 /2 "36" RADIUS2 1/2"3 5 /8 " 2 1/2"2"1 1/2" 5 1/2"2 1/2"22"2 1/2"3"4"19"1 1/2"5 1/2"3 1/2"DRAWN BYDESCRIPTIONPROJECT #PROJECTISSUERE-ISSUEBUILDER18475 KENRICK AVEUNE SUITE 202LAKEVILLE, MN 55044TEL: 952.428.8200EM: Dave@DavidCharlezDesigns.comD A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N Sa Notes: Dimensions, details and conformation to all local codes are to be verified by owner and contractor prior to the start of construction. The designer of the home is not a licensed structural engineer or architect and will assume no responsibility for items including, but not limited to : construction technique, quality of material, workmanship, code adherence, safety, water proofing, insulation, radon, mold/mildew or other designs, specification or construction issues. It is recommended that a lic ensed engineer review all plans for structural integrity and verify that the home meets code for extraordinary wind or other natural stresses such as flooding, snowfall or substandard bearing soil. All structural members on the plans should be verified by the manufacturer and their licensed engineering staff. Is is also recommended that a licensed contractor be commissioned to construct the home. All door and window size are approximate rough openings. Specific manufacturer sizes vary and egress openings should be confirmed prior to construction. The home should be flashed and enclosed to meet local code. Sizes of material and products reflect accepted industry standards and in no way indicate a specific manufacturer. All building components to be installed and constructed to selected manufacturer specified installation techniques and in accordance with local building codes. Optional items may be shown on the home, within the landscaping/site plan or in the rendering for illustrative purpose only. Consult builder for standard or included features. c David Charlez Designs 2020. Do not replicate with out permission (952)428-8200. David Charlez Design retains rights to all plans and detail shown.2/25/2020 5:43:38PM01 Front & Rear ElevationsCOH -Villas Lot 4 -CD -SMVilla Model CCustom One Homes652 Bielenberg DriveSuite 103Woodbury MN 5512501.24.2020SMM7316 Harkness WayCottage Grove, MNTYPICAL EXTERIOR MATERIALS SQ FT BREAKDOWN SEE FINAL PAGE FOR SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONS ASPHALT SHINGLES W/ NATURAL SHADOW ARCHITECTURAL GRADE 7" EXPOSURE HARDIESHINGLE STRAIGHT EDGE PER ELEVATION (FRONT ONLY) HARDIE BOARD & BATTEN PER ELEVATION 5" EXPOSURE VINYL LAP SIDING PER ELEVATION (SIDES & REAR ELEVATION) STONE VENEER PER ELEVATION INSTALL KICK OUT FLASHING & TWO MEMBRANE TAR PAPER BACKING IN ALL STONE AREAS 5/4" x 4" HARDIE WINDOW & DOOR WRAPS PER ELEVATION 5/4" x 4" HARDIE CORNER BOARDS PER ELEVATION(FRONT ONLY) 4" VINYL CORNERS PER ELEVATION (SIDES & REAR ELEVATIONS) 1X3 ON 1X8 FASCIA PER ELEVATION ALUMINUM VENTED SOFFITS PER ELEVATION HOUSE WRAP AND/OR TAR PAPER IN PROPER FORM ON ENTIRE EXTERIOR B C A 1/4" = 1'-0"1 Front Elevation 1/4" = 1'-0"2 Rear Elevation 1/8" = 1'-0"3 Roof Plan D 1 1/2" = 1'-0"4 Detail -Corbel 1 1/2" = 1'-0"5 Detail -Bracket C 4/4 x 12 SKIRT BOARD 4" VINYL CORNER BD.4" HARDIE CORNER BD.5/4" x 6" TRIM BOARD PROVIDE SLOPED SIDEWALKD 4" VINYL CORNER BD.4" VINYL CORNER BD.CC C 4" VINYL CORNER BD.B 5/4" x 6" TRIM BOARD D D 4" VINYL CORNER BD.C C12"1.25 x 4 CORNER BOARD 1 x 6 BOARD 1 x 4 BOARD 2 x 2 STRUCTURAL 2 x 4 STRUCTURAL 1/2" PLYWOOD8"VERIFY DIM. WITH ELEVATIONS VENTED PANEL 1.25 x 4 CORNER BOARD DRAWN BYDESCRIPTIONPROJECT #PROJECTISSUERE-ISSUEBUILDER18475 KENRICK AVEUNE SUITE 202LAKEVILLE, MN 55044TEL: 952.428.8200EM: Dave@DavidCharlezDesigns.comD A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N Sa Notes: Dimensions, details and conformation to all local codes are to be verified by owner and contractor prior to the start of construction. The designer of the home is not a licensed structural engineer or architect and will assume no responsibility for items including, but not limited to : construction technique, quality of material, workmanship, code adherence, safety, water proofing, insulation, radon, mold/mildew or other designs, specification or construction issues. It is recommended that a lic ensed engineer review all plans for structural integrity and verify that the home meets code for extraordinary wind or other natural stresses such as flooding, snowfall or substandard bearing soil. All structural members on the plans should be verified by the manufacturer and their licensed engineering staff. Is is also recommended that a licensed contractor be commissioned to construct the home. All door and window size are approximate rough openings. Specific manufacturer sizes vary and egress openings should be confirmed prior to construction. The home should be flashed and enclosed to meet local code. Sizes of material and products reflect accepted industry standards and in no way indicate a specific manufacturer. All building components to be installed and constructed to selected manufacturer specified installation techniques and in accordance with local building codes. Optional items may be shown on the home, within the landscaping/site plan or in the rendering for illustrative purpose only. Consult builder for standard or included features. c David Charlez Designs 2020. Do not replicate with out permission (952)428-8200. David Charlez Design retains rights to all plans and detail shown.2/25/2020 5:43:38PM02 Left & Right ElevationsCOH -Villas Lot 4 -CD -SMVilla Model CCustom One Homes652 Bielenberg DriveSuite 103Woodbury MN 5512501.24.2020SMM7316 Harkness WayCottage Grove, MN1/4" = 1'-0"1 Left Elevation 1/4" = 1'-0"2 Right Elevation 3/4" = 1'-0"4 Detail -Flower Box First Floor 0' -0" First Floor Clg. 9' -1 1/8" A B Main Level @ Hdr Hgt96"5/4 x 6 TRIM BOARD B 13' - 11 1/2"9' - 1 1/8"4" HARDIE CORNER BD.WINDOW TRIM CONSTRUCTION: 5/4 x 4 TOP/BOTTOM HORIZONTAL 5/4 x 4 VERTICAL DOOR TRIM CONSTRUCTION: 5/4 x 4 TOP HORIZONTAL 5/4 x 4 VERTICAL 2020 FX BEAM PER MFG. SPEC @ 15'-0" FROM M.L. D 5/4 x 6 F RIE Z E B D. T.O. Footing -3' -8 1/4" 5/4 x 6 TRIM BOARD DD 5/4 x 6 F RIE Z E B D. 5/4 x 6 TRIM BOARD A A 4" HARDIE CORNER BD.Roof Peak 23' -0 81/128"4" VINYL CORNER BD.C 4" VINYL CORNER BD.4" VINYL CORNER BD.C 5/4 x 6 TRIM BOARD 5/4 x 6 F RIE Z E B O A R D 4" VINYL CORNER BD.4" HARDIE CORNER BD.C D 4" VINYL CORNER BD.4" VINYL CORNER BD.4" HARDIE CORNER BD.C D 5/4 x 6 TRIM BOARD DRAWN BYDESCRIPTIONPROJECT #PROJECTISSUERE-ISSUEBUILDER18476 KENRICK AVE, SUITE 202LAKEVILLE, MN 55044TEL: 952.428.8200EM: Dave@DavidCharlezDesigns.comD A V I D C H A R L E Z D E S I G N Sa Notes: Dimensions, details and conformation to all local codes are to be verified by owner and contractor prior to the start of construction. The designer of the home is not a licensed structural engineer or architect and will assume no responsibility for items including, but not limited to : construction technique, quality of material, workmanship, code adherence, safety, water proofing, insulation, radon, mold/mildew or other designs, specification or construction issues. It is recommended that a lic ensed engineer review all plans for structural integrity and verify that the home meets code for extraordinary wind or other natural stresses such as flooding, snowfall or substandard bearing soil. All structural members on the plans should be verified by the manufacturer and their licensed engineering staff. Is is also recommended that a licensed contractor be commissioned to construct the home. All door and window size are approximate rough openings. Specific manufacturer sizes vary and egress openings should be confirmed prior to construction. The home should be flashed and enclosed to meet local code. Sizes of material and products reflect accepted industry standards and in no way indicate a specific manufacturer. All building components to be installed and constructed to selected manufacturer specified installation techniques and in accordance with local building codes. Optional items may be shown on the home, within the landscaping/site plan or in the rendering for illustrative purpose only. Consult builder for standard or included features. c David Charlez Designs 2016. Do not replicate with out permission (952)428-8200. David Charlez Design retains rights to all plans and detail shown.8/3/2020 3:06:38PM01 ElevationsCOH-Villa D-Model Home-CD's -LMC7319 Harkness WayThe Villas Of Hidden Valley-Lot 15Cottage Grove, MNCustom One Homes652 Bielenberg DriveSuite 103Woodbury MN 5512508.03.20LMCTYPICAL EXTERIOR MATERIALS SQ FT BREAKDOWN SEE FINAL PAGE FOR SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONS ASPHALT SHINGLES W/ NATURAL SHADOW ARCHITECTURAL GRADE 5" EXPOSURE HARDIELAP SIDING PER ELEVATION (FRONT ONLY) HARDIE STRAIGHT SHAKES PER ELEVATION 5" EXPOSURE VINYL LAP SIDING PER ELEVATION (SIDES & REAR ELEVATION) STONE VENEER PER ELEVATION INSTALL KICK OUT FLASHING & TWO MEMBRANE TAR PAPER BACKING IN ALL STONE AREAS 5/4" x 4" HARDIE WINDOW & DOOR WRAPS PER ELEVATION 5/4" x 4" HARDIE CORNER BOARDS PER ELEVATION(FRONT ONLY) 4" VINYL CORNERS PER ELEVATION (SIDES & REAR ELEVATIONS) 1X6 FASCIA PER ELEVATION ALUMINUM VENTED SOFFITS PER ELEVATION HOUSE WRAP AND/OR TAR PAPER IN PROPER FORM ON ENTIRE EXTERIOR B C A 1/4" = 1'-0"2 Front Elevation 1/4" = 1'-0"1 Rear Elevation D 1/4" = 1'-0"3 Right Elevation 1/4" = 1'-0"4 Left Elevation Apple Valley, MN0025743.01 01-07-2021 Phone (952) 937-5150 Fax (952) 937-5822 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 12701 Whitewater Drive Minnetonka, MN 55343 westwoodps.com Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Lakeside View Single Family R-1 Zoning Villas Homes PD Zoning with a Lakeshore Preservation Outlot The Cove Apple Valley, MN Illustrative Site Plan: Phone (952) 937-5150 Fax (952) 937-5822 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite 300 Minnetonka, MN 55343 westwoodps.com Westwood Professional Services, Inc. The Cove at Lake Farquar Apple Valley, MN Section A-A’ Section B-B’ 7-07-2020 Illustrative Cross Sections 0025743 Scale: 1/16” = 1’-0” Phone (952) 937-5150 Fax (952) 937-5822 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 12701 Whitewater Drive Minnetonka, MN 55343 westwoodps.com Westwood Professional Services, Inc. VILLA HOMES FARQUAR LAKE Inlt. BasinWetland Inlt. Basin Existing GradeProposed Grade +/- Shared Beach/ Rec. Area Common Boat Slips 75’ min. Setback R/W Lot Line OHWL Landscape Buer Common Lot HOA Maint. / Preserved O.S. VILLA HOMES FARQUAR LAKE Existing GradeProposed Grade +/- 75’ min. Setback R/W Lot Line OHWL Landscape Buer Common Lot HOA Maint. / Preserved O.S. The Cove Apple Valley, MN0025743.01 12-10-2020 Phone (952) 937-5150 Fax (952) 937-5822 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 12701 Whitewater Drive Minnetonka, MN 55343 westwoodps.com Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Lakeside View CITY OF MEMO Public Works TO: Kathy Bodmer, Planner FROM: Jessica Schaum, Natural Resources Coordinator DATE: January 28, 2021 SUBJECT: Farquar Lake Activities and Management The following are responses regarding the background of Farquar Lake water quality, the City’s improvements to the watershed, and basic measures the City requires of construction projects to help protect downstream resources. 1. Please discuss the water quality of Farquar Lake and the steps the City has taken to make improvements. Farquar Lake is considered a shallow lake. Like many shallow lakes in developed suburban areas, there are concerns with water quality and the lake has been listed as “impaired for nutrients” since 2002. The 2002 impairment led to the development of the Long and Farquar Lakes Nutrient TMDL (Total Maximum Daily Load) in 2009 (led by the City of Apple Valley); a Long and Farquar Lakes TMDL Implementation Plan in 2010; and an updated Implementation Plan in 2017. The original 2009 study assessed the nutrient load reductions needed for Long and Farquar Lake to comply with Minnesota water quality standards and outlined the sources of nutrients, target reduction values from each source, and strategies, and activities to meet the reduction values. The impairment looks at both internal and external sources of nutrient loads. External loads are managed through in ground practices upstream in the watershed, such as a stormwater pond or rain gardens; whereas internal loading is typically managed through in- lake treatments such as alum dosing or activities like fish management. The 2010 implementation plan discussed activities and specific projects to reduce the nutrient loading to each lake for 5 years. Because runoff from Long Lake enters Farquar Lake, projects implemented in the Long Lake watershed will help improve water quality in both Long and Farquar Lakes. Projects implemented from 2010-2017 to make water quality improvements included: • EVR-Pond 8 Iron Enhanced Sand Filter in Moeller Park • Long Lake Park 2 Cell Iron Enhanced Sand Filter • EVR-P12 (Everest Pond) and EVR- P170 (Pilot Pond) Alum Treatment • EVR-P13 Pond Expansion in Long Lake Park • Falcon Ridge Middle School Raingardens • Everest Ave tree filter and raingarden near 133rd Street Court The updated implementation plan in 2017, completed by EOR, included a working implementation table of BMPs (Best Management Practices) for the next 20 years. This plan update was done in conjunction with the Long and Farquar Lake Association representatives. The City uses this document to leverage grant applications and while planning city capital improvement projects. Since the 2017 updated plan has been completed, the City has completed or is working on the following projects that were outlined in the plan: • Long Lake drawdown (about every 5 years) • Johnny Cake Ridge Road Corridor BMPs • Successful grant application for the EVR-P27 (Erickson Park) pond improvement; anticipating 2021 construction and completion • 2020/2021 successful grant application for an additional feasibility assessment on pond modifications outlined in the 2017 Implementation plan table As the City works through fulfilling projects through its capital improvement program, we continue implementing annual activities that help improve water quality, including: • Rainwater Rewards program, which offers grant dollars to landowners interested in installing raingardens, native gardens, and shoreline restorations • Annual winter lake aeration • Annual vegetation surveys – showing native vs. invasive plants growing in lake • Annual invasive curly-leaf pondweed treatment (as needed) • Regular fish surveys and stocking – guides decisions to stock game fish or manage rough fish • Enhanced street sweeping – additional passes in the neighborhoods surrounding Long and Farquar Lakes to collect extra debris on roadways • Regular water quality monitoring by city staff and through Met Council’s CAMP program (a resident volunteering) to track long-term trends While water quality is still below state standards, recent monitoring data is showing trends that water quality is improving. Practices installed on the landscape can take time to have an effect and we continue to monitor our installed practices to ensure that they continue to be effective. State permitting requirements under the City’s MS4 (Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System) program, require the City to demonstrate the installed projects and practices and to outline future projects to meet water quality goals for impaired waters. The City is well positioned with our planning documents and future grant projects to continue to make strides in improving the water quality in Long and Farquar Lakes. In addition, rigorous development standards will require any new or redevelopment in the city to manage stormwater runoff through infiltration or ponding practices to mitigate impacts to both water quality and quantity. 2. What are the lake protection requirements that the City will place on the development during construction and after? The City’s Natural Resources Technician inspects all active construction sites regularly as they are permitted through the City’s Natural Resources Management Permit (NRMP) process. The purpose of the NRMP code and regulations regarding erosion and sediment control are to minimize impacts to our water bodies. In addition to City codes, the state’s NPDES (National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System) Construction Stormwater permit, requires that the contractor responsible for the project install the site’s erosion and sediment control techniques according to the permit and they must inspect their own practices for regular maintenance and upkeep. Any projects adjacent to lakes or water bodies have more rigorous erosion and sediment control standards and timeframes under the state permit. These “BMPs” or “Best Management Practices” are explained on the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan or “SWPPP pages” of all grading plan sets. It’s important to recognize that SWPPP documents are typically a “living document” that can adjusted as the project progresses. The plans shall incorporate the following erosion and sediment controls and waste controls for the project: 1. Site meeting and inspection prior to site disturbance to ensure adequate BMP’s are installed correct and meet approved SWPPP. 2. Site inspections (required weekly and after 0.5 inch rain events) and records of rainfall events. 3. Redundant additional BMP with Silt fence. 4. Disturbed soils must immediately initiate temporary or permanent cover and must be completed no later than 7 days after an area has been worked. Phasing of disturbed areas will minimize risk. 5. BMPs to minimize erosion such as temporary seed/mulch and erosion control blankets. 6. BMPs to minimize the discharge of sediment and other pollutants such as rock ditch checks and temporary ponding basins. 7. BMPs for dewatering activities 8. BMP maintenance (example: cleaning out sediment if silt fence is ½ full). 9. Management of solid and hazardous wastes on each project site. 10. Criteria for the use of temporary sediment basins. 11. Floating silt curtains can be provided but function as a secondary perimeter control device working as a last line of defense if other multiple devices should fail. 12. Final stabilization upon the completion of construction activity, including the use of perennial vegetative cover on all exposed soils or other equivalent means. During construction City staff continue to inspect the site under the NRMP regulations and will produce correspondence based on any issues witnessed. Staff share any corrections needed and a timeframe to make these corrections with the NRMP permit-holder. The NRMP process includes receiving fees to help offset the City staff time for these inspections, as well as requires financial escrows or securities to be held by the City. Should continued non-compliance with staff requested corrections take place, the City could utilize the escrow dollars to have the work completed by an outside vendor. Once each NRMP site or construction project is fully stabilized, the replacement trees are re- planted, and the stormwater features (such as rain gardens and infiltration basins) are functioning as they were designed and permitted, the escrow dollars are returned and the NRMP permit is considered completed. Additional resources for state permit requirements: https://www.pca.state.mn.us/sites/default/files/wq-strm2-80a.pdf https://www.pca.state.mn.us/sites/default/files/wq-strm2-05.pdf City of MEMO Building Inspections TO: Kathy Bodmer, Planner FROM: George Dorn, Building Official DATE: December 10, 2020 SUBJECT: 13101 Diamond Path, The Cove at Lake Farquar  One SAC charge will be required for each new house prior to permit issuance from the City.  Fire resistance of exterior walls will be based on fire separation distances will be reviewed once the plans are submitted for permitting.  Separate building, plumbing, mechanical, and electrical permits are required for each new house.  Provide geotechnical reports, including boring logs, prior to permit issuance, and also provide soil corrections on site.  Construction shall comply with all requirements of the Minnesota Building Code.  Construction shall comply with all requirements of the Apple Valley City Code.  Prior to turning on the water to the property, a final plumbing inspection must be approved. The meter must be sealed and the water reader installed. If you have any questions in regards to the water utilities, please contact the Public Works Department at 952-953-2400.  No site work may begin without City approval and/or permit.  Contact the City of Apple Valley Planning Department for sign permit information at 952- 953-2571. You are encouraged to apply for the sign permit immediately along with the building permit. This will ensure a complete accurate plan review and timely permit issuance.  The City of Apple Valley requires a Natural Resources Management Permit (NRMP). The permit may be obtained through the Building Inspection Department. Once the NRMP has been issued, please contact Keenan Hayes at 952-953-2464 for a site inspection prior to commencing any grading or earth work.  Platting of the property lines must be completed prior to permit issuance. Apple Valley Fire Department MEMO City of Apple Valley TO: Kathy Bodmer- Planner FROM: Brian Kilmartin- Fire Marshal DATE: January 13, 2021- REVISED SUBJECT: The Cove - It would be preferred that the Fire Hydrants not be located on the same side of the street as the parking. Could we ask that there are No Parking signs installed on the hydrant side? - Both the cul-de-sac and the hammer head being constructed as part of this project need to be proven to meet The City of Apple Valley’s requirements along with Appendix D of the MSFC. - Due to the new design, the cul de sac added needs to have the green space removed. The approved cu de sac exhibit per the Fire Code does not allow for the center. - Please feel free to let me know if you have any questions, Brian Kilmartin Fire Marshal CITY OF MEMO Public Works TO: Kathy Bodmer, Planner FROM: Brandon S. Anderson, City Engineer DATE: January 15, 2021 SUBJECT: Cove at Lake Farquar Preliminary Plan Review Kathy, The following are comments regarding the Cove at Lake Farquar Preliminary Plat & Plans submitted January 7th, 2021. Please include these items as conditions to approval. General 1. All work and infrastructure within public easements or right of way shall be to City standards. 2. Drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated on final plat over all public infrastructure. 3. No construction work shall begin prior to a preconstruction meeting conference with a Public works and a Building Inspections representative. 4. Infiltration Maintenance Agreement will be required for the privately owned storm water treatment areas. 5. The developer shall identify whether site utilities will be installed under private or public contract. 6. Provide a signage plan, parking will be allowed on one side of the street only. 7. A 10’ bike trail will be required along Diamond Path in the future and as part of development agreement an escrow be provided for future construction. 8. The impervious surface percentage cannot exceed 25%, currently the impervious surface percentage is 24.3%. The applicant shall recognize that adding additional impervious on individual lots, such as pools, patios, driveway expansions, etc. may not be possible for future landowners. 9. The applicant shall consider whether secondary lake access, for canoes/kayaks, etc. can be provided for the southern lots. 10. Existing septic system at 15654 Diamond Path shall be properly disconnected/decommissioned in conjunction with the home demolition permit. Permits 11. A public infrastructure project is anticipated for the proposed sanitary sewer and water services. Plans and specifications shall be completed by the City of Apple Valley. A private installation agreement may be necessary for construction of public infrastructure by developer or the developer can have the City of Apple Valley publicly bid the improvements and provide assessments back to the property. 12. Provide a copy of the executed Minnesota Department of Health, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Met Council, Department of Labor and any other required permits prior to construction. 13. A right of way permit will be required for all work within public easements or right of way. 14. A Natural Resource Management Permit (NRMP) will be required prior to any land disturbing activity commences. This must include a buffer restoration plan. 15. If dewatering more than 10,000 gallons per day, a DNR temporary dewatering permit will be required. Existing Conditions Plan 16. The existing well will need to be abandoned in accordance with Dakota County. Site Plan 17. Show truck movement with Auto turn entering site to ensure emergency and service vehicles can maneuver thru the street. The turnaround on the south end shall meet the 2020 Minnesota State Fire Code, Section 503. The Dimensions shown on Appendix D are from Face of curb to Face of curb, please revise the fire turnaround dimensions to be F-F. 18. All retaining walls over 48” from bottom of footing to the top of wall shall be designed and certified by a structural engineer and submitted to building inspections for final approval. Provide additional details and/or specifications for retaining wall block type. 19. Retaining Walls shall be privately owned and maintained. 20. The Common Area (Fire Pit/Bench) is shown over the top of the existing sanitary sewer easement, this should be moved outside of this easement. Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control 21. Final Grading Plans shall be reviewed and approved by City Engineer. 22. Final Stormwater Management Plan shall be reviewed and approved by City Engineer. 23. Provide Final Hydro CAD modeling files to the City Engineer. 24. Provide the Storm water Pollution and Prevention Plan (SWPPP) prior to construction. 25. Project is located within 1 mile of an identified impaired water (Farquar Lake). Farquar Lake is impaired for nutrients. a. Per Apple Valley SWMP policy 6.4, enhancement to the pond and infiltration bench to capture dissolved phosphorous are recommended. b. Must comply with NPDES Construction permit section 23.9 and 23.10 26. A storm water infiltration maintenance agreement will be needed for all the proposed rain gardens. 27. An easement will need to be provided for the 10’ wide proposed pathway for Public Works to maintain existing easement and public utilities. Storm Sewer 28. Final locations and sizes of Storm Sewer shall be reviewed with the final construction plans and approved by City Engineer. 29. Provide storm sewer calculations for stormwater requirements. (Rational method including Hydraulic grade lines). 30. Any sumps shall be privately maintained and routinely cleaned as the accumulated sediment will be from the private roadways. 31. Show drain tile and cleanouts on utility plan. 32. If rain garden 1 and CB-12 will collect drainage from offsite they will be required to have a drainage and utility easement and be owned and operated by the City of Apple Valley. Sanitary Sewer and Water Main 33. Final locations and sizes of Sanitary Sewer and Water main shall be reviewed with the final construction plans and approved by City Engineer. 34. All water mains located within right of way and public easements for purposes of connection to public infrastructure shall be ductile iron pipe and meet all City standards. 35. Provide additional drawing showing fire hydrant coverage. 36. Existing sanitary sewer structure castings may need to be adjusted. Add a note that contractor shall coordinate with the City on elevations for these castings. Buffer and Wetlands 37. A wetland delineation was approved on 7/9/2020. The applicant must address any proposed wetland impacts, such as the proposed raingarden outlet, through the appropriate WCA application – no loss, de minimus, etc. if necessary. 38. The applicant is proposing a Conservation Easement exceeding the 75 foot setback requirement. The easement area includes 2 raingardens, the delineated wetland, a permeable trail, a common fire pit area, and a common mooring dock. The City requires: a. Buffer width adjacent to the wetland is 40’ average with a 30’ minimum. A 10’ building setback from the buffer is required. The buffer width is based on their wetland rating from the Vermillion River Watershed Joint Powers Organization wetland assessment from 2007 (Manage 1 in this instance.) b. Buffer width adjacent to the lake where there is no additional wetland is 16.5’. c. Vegetated Buffer width of 16.5 foot vegetated buffer zone abutting stormwater management ponds. 39. The applicant shall confirm that these buffer standards are met. a. A protective buffer zone component (PBC) shall be submitted as part of the natural resource management plan, The PBC requirements can be found in City Ordinance 152.16 (4)(b)(5). The plan shall consider the proposed seed mixes (highlighted below) and recommended maintenance efforts associated with them. 40. The City requires that protective buffer zones be established consistent with the procedures and criteria established in City ordinance chapter 152.57. The protective buffer zone shall be memorialized in perpetuity by a written document approved by the City and a certified survey of the property which shall be recorded by Dakota County. The document shall establish the location of any buffer zones, restrictions, allowances, and management requirements. a. The delineated wetland is classified as “Manage 1”. The south raingarden discharges into the delineated wetland. The City requires that hydrologic impacts to wetlands resulting from development and redevelopment activities do not exceed the following: b. Where protective buffer zones are established, the City requires the upland boundary line to be identified by permanent markers, approved by the City at each lot line, and one at every 50-foot interval. Sign information can be provided by the City. c. If an HOA is established, ongoing resources shall be provided regarding these maintenance efforts. This will include maintenance of the stormwater features including any stormwater pipes/sumps necessary for the stormwater feature to function AND the long-term vegetation maintenance of the buffers and raingardens. The management plan shall considers the maintenance recommendation of the proposed seed mixes. (See Seed Mix information at end of this memo and maintenance recommendations listed above) Landscape and Natural Resources 41. The Preliminary Landscape Plan (11/04/2020) indicates types of trees with batched symbols and species. For example, “111 Buffer over story trees” made up of 9 different varieties. Provide tree labels and schedule with quantities of each variety. 42. The proposed planting plan indicates replanting trees near the right-of-way for Diamond Path. No trees are permitted in County ROW. Overhead power lines along Diamond Path may interfere with the proposed tree plantings. Ensure any tree planted will have adequate space when mature and will not create a utility line conflict. 43. Show all tree impacts for underground utilities. Adequate setbacks from utility service lines are required for any tree plantings. Minnesota DNR Rules & Regulations 44. The applicant shall consult the MN DNR about any permitting requirements for the following items: a. Docks: The applicant shall work with the DNR on boat slip excavation or permitting, as needed. b. Sand blankets: Existing beach to remain compliant with current state regulations and City ordinance (see 152.57 (E)(7). c. Ice Ridge: There appears to be a small ice ridge in some locations along the shoreline. State regulations only allow regrading of ice ridges in certain limited cases. A DNR permit may be required and DNR regulations may prohibit this activity. Dakota County Surveyor’s Office Western Service Center  14955 Galaxie Avenue  Apple Valley, MN 55124 952.891 -7087  Fax 952.891 -7127  www.co.dakota.mn.us December 2, 2020 City of Apple Valley 7100 147th Street W. Apple Valley, MN 55124 Re: THE COVE The Dakota County Plat Commission met on November 25, 2020, to consider the preliminary plat of the above referenced plat. The plat is adjacent to CSAH 33 (Diamond Path) and is therefore subject to the Dakota County Contiguous Plat Ordinance. The revised plan includes 17 detached townhomes with one access to CSAH 33 (Diamond Path). The right-of-way needs for CSAH 33 are either a 3-lane/4-lane undivided or 2-lane divided roadway and are 60 feet of half right of way. The plat is dedicating an additional 10-feet to meet the needs. The additional dedication for CSAH 33 should be determined by offsetting 120 feet from the recorded plat of EVERMOOR APPLE VALLEY. The access spacing guidelines are ¼ mile (1,320 feet) for a full access. As discussed, there are challenges in determining the best location for access to this property. The plan includes one private access location approximately 470 feet north of Evermoor Parkway. As discussed, the proposed access location could become a right-turns only access with reconstruction of a 2-lane divided roadway design along CSAH 33 in the future. As noted, there are no plans or design for CSAH 33 at this time. It may be beneficial to move the proposed driveway access to Evermoor Parkway; however, it is challenging due to the existing wide intersection of Evermoor Parkway. If not, a future plan to allow relocation of the proposed access to a full access intersection at Evermoor Parkway if a two-lane divided roadway is designed along CSAH 33 would be beneficial. The Plat Commission has approved the preliminary plat provided that the described conditions are met. The Ordinance requires submittal of a final plat for review by the Plat Commission before a recommendation is made to the County Board of Commissioners. Traffic volumes on CSAH 33 are 8,100 ADT and are anticipated to be 10,000 ADT by the year 2030. These traffic volumes indicate that current Minnesota noise standards for residential units could be exceeded for the proposed plat. Residential developments along County highways commonly result in noise complaints. In order for noise levels from the highway to meet acceptable levels for adjacent residential units, substantial building setbacks, buffer areas, and other noise mitigation elements should be incorporated into this development. No work shall commence in the County right of way until a permit is obtained from the County Transportation Department and no permit will be issued until the plat has been filed with the County Recorder’s Office. The Plat Commission does not review or approve the actual engineering design of proposed accesses or other improvements to be made in the right of way. Nothing herein is intended to restrict or limit Dakota County’s rights with regards to Dakota County rights of way or property. The Plat Commission highly recommends early contact with the Transportation Department to discuss the permitting process which reviews the design and may require construction of highway improvements, including, but not limited to, turn lanes, drainage features, limitations on intersecting street widths, medians, etc. Please contact Gordon McConnell regarding permitting questions at (952) 891-7115 or Todd Tollefson regarding Plat Commission or Plat Ordinance questions at (952) 891-7070. Sincerely, Todd B. Tollefson Secretary, Plat Commission c: Mark Sonstegard, JMH Land Development Ryan Bluhm, Westwood Ecological and Water Resources 1200 Warner Road St. Paul, MN 55106 December 7, 2020 Kathy Bodmer Planner City of Apple Valley 7100 147th Street West Apple Valley, MN 55124 RE: DNR Preliminary Planned Unit Development Plan Approval, The Cove, Farquar Lake No. 19-23, City of Apple Valley, Dakota County Dear Ms. Bodmer, The Department has reviewed the updated plans for the proposed “The Cove” Planned Unit Development (PUD), dated December 2, 2020, which were submitted to DNR on December 4, 2020. The proposed PUD is on an 8.12-acre parcel located in the Section 24, T115N, R20W, Dakota County. The parcel is located within the Shoreland District of Farquar Lake, No. 19-23, a Recreational Development Lake. It is proposed to develop 17 residential units on this parcel all encompassed within the first and only shoreland tier. The proposed 17 residential units is lower than the maximum density allowable, which was calculated to be 20 units. This development will maintain roughly 73.9% of the shore impact zone as undisturbed natural space, which exceeds the required 70% natural space. Total impervious surface will be limited to 24.3% and mooring spaces will be limited to 17 spaces or fewer. The large protected riparian area containing existing or restored vegetation provides better shoreland protection than conventional lot and block subdivisions containing riparian lots. Riparian lots, each with their own access and water recreation areas, have significantly greater impacts to shoreland and aquatic resources than those subdivisions with large protected riparian areas and no riparian lots. Overall, the proposed PUD is consistent with the minimum requirements for shoreland Residential PUDs in Minnesota Rules, Chapter 6120.3800. These are minimum standards and local governments are encouraged to hold projects to higher standards to ensure better shoreland protections. Sincerely, Taylor Huinker Area Hydrologist CC: Dan Petrik, DNR Land Use Specialist Management Activities Apple Valley has invested in multiple strategies to improve water quality. Capital projects include:  Everest Ave raingarden & tree trench  Falcon Ridge Middle School Raingardens  Long Lake Park Iron Enhanced Sand Project  Johnny Cake Ridge Road retrofits Looking ahead, the City will continue:  Enhanced street sweeping around the lake  Treatment of Curlyleaf Pondweed (invasive)  Periodic fish surveys & stocking  Monthly water quality monitoring  Funding additional projects identified in the 2017 Long and Farquar Implementation plan F arquar Lake is a shallow lake nestled in a largely resi- dential area of Apple Valley. The lake and conjoining park is a recreational resource in the City, allowing residents to go out for a paddle, wet a fishing line, or enjoy a leisurely walk along the lakeside trail. Like many shallow lakes in developed areas, in addition to it’s natural beauty, Farquar also has concerns related to water quality. Farquar receives direct runoff from land around the lake but also is connected to the storm sewer system, meaning it receives runoff through underground pipes from neighborhoods surrounding the lake. When it rains, stormwater runoff can carry pollutants like phosphorus and sediment into the lakes. These pollutants can cause algal blooms. Farquar also has significant in-lake phosphorus cycling (phosphorus released from lake sediments), which also contributes to nutrient-rich lake conditions. Due to high levels of phosphorus and poor water clarity, Farquar has been on the state’s impaired water list since 2002. The City of Apple Valley have been actively working to improve water quality conditions by installing projects that prevent pollution from enter- ing the lake, as well as projects that help reduce in-lake cycling of nutri- ents. Water quality is showing improvements, however, it can take time to for these projects to have an effect. Areas with green shading represent the entire watershed that drains to Farquar Lake CHARACTERISTICS Size 67 acres Average Depth 4.5 feet Maximum Depth 10 feet Watershed Size 1,900 acres Lake Classification Recreational Common Fish: Black Bullhead, Bluegill, Hybrid & Pumpkinseed Sunfish, Black Crappie, Walleye, Largemouth Bass Did you know? Farquar Lake is connected to Long Lake? Therefore, projects completed near Long Lake will benefit Farquar Lake. LLong Lake Iron Enhanced Sand Filter State of the Water For more information visit: Grants: https://www.ci.apple-valley.mn.us/376/Rainwater-Rewards-Grant-Program Phosphorous : Nutrient that is a major driver of algae blooms and plant growth. Aquatic Plants A diverse aquatic plant community is a sign of a healthy lake. How does Farquar compare to lakes with similar characteristics? Number of Aquatic Species Comparison Farquar in 2020: 3 Vs. Nearby unimpaired lake: 13 Invasive species present: Curly-leaf Pondweed Aquatic Plants: Help stabilize sediments, limits algal blooms , and provide fish habitat. Water Clarity: Measured by lower- ing black & white disc into water until no longer visible. Aquatic Plants: Help stabilize sediments, limit algae blooms, & provide fish habitat. Harmful Algal Blooms are common mid-summer in Farquar and are known to cause sickness in dogs. If you see blue-green water, use caution and rinse off quickly if exposed. When in doubt, stay out! Phosphorous: Nutrient that is a major driver of algae blooms & plant growth. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes December 16, 2020 Page 3 of 12 Addition; subject to the conditions identified in the December 16, 2020, Planning Commission report. Roll call vote: Ayes - 6 – Nays – 0. MOTION: Commissioner Burke moved, seconded by Commissioner Schindler, approving the site plan/building permit authorization to allow for construction of a 7,400-sq. ft. multi-tenant with a 60-seat coffee shop on Lot 4, Block 1, Orchard Place 2nd Addition; subject to the conditions identified in the December 16, 2020, Planning Commission report. Roll call vote: Ayes - 6 – Nays – 0. MOTION: Commissioner Burke moved, seconded by Commissioner Schindler, approving the site plan/building permit authorization to allow for construction of an 8,200-sq. ft. multi-tenant building on Lot 4, Block 1, Orchard Place 2nd Addition; subject to the conditions identified in the December 16, 2020, Planning Commission report. Roll call vote: Ayes - 6 – Nays – 0. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. The Cove – Consider Rezoning of Three Properties from “R-1 (Single-Family Residential to “PD” (Planned Development), Preliminary Plat to Creat 17 Lots, Conditional Use Permit for “PD” within “SH” Zone, and Site Plan Review Building Permit Authorization. Planner Kathy Bodmer presented the staff report. Chair Melander asks if there are any questions from the commissioners. Commissioner Scanlon – Can you talk about emergency vehicle access to the property? Planner Bodmer – The private street is 28-feet wide which meets the requirements for fire access, the cul-de-sac meets the requirements, but the hammer head does not meet the requirements. We will be working with the developer to make revisions to bring to compliance. Commissioner Scanlon – How about parking? I have a concern with any activity going on for guests, that there will not be enough parking on one side of the street with this density. Planner Bodmer – The 28-foot wide street will allow for parking on one-side of the street. We are recommending that it is the opposite side of the driveways so that will allow for guest parking. The homes each have surface driveways that will allow for two surface parking. Each of the homes have two-stall garages. Commissioner Scanlon – I’m looking at this and have concern for run-off. I’m CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes December 16, 2020 Page 4 of 12 trying to visualize where snow removal will take place with the private drives. There doesn’t seem to be any point of storage. Planner Bodmer – That’s a good point. That could be shown on the plan. Typically companies prefer to shove snow at the end of the street. There is a retaining wall so we would want to meet with the developer to see what the options are for that. That is definitely a question that needs to be resolved. Commissioner Kurtz – Is there only one spot for parking when coming to visit with kayaks. Is that the parking on Pilot Knob Road? I believe parking will be an issue for company and visitors. Planner Bodmer – I believe that is correct. There is just one public access available for the lake from Farquar Park. Commissioner Diekmann – Do all the current homes around the lake meet the shore land overlay zoning district requirements or were some of those grandfathered in? How do those compare along the beach and buffer zones? Planner Bodmer – I need to research and provide a response at the next meeting. Mark Sonstegard, GMH Land Company – Ryan Bluhm (on-line), West Wood Professional Services, and Todd Polifka, Custom One Homes, LLC, are with me also. Mr. Sonstegard presented a PowerPoint regarding designing and developing this project. He states that the development has met all requirements from the DNR. One dock with possibility of 3 boats from the HOA are proposed. An infiltration area and landscape buffer areas will collect all the water and runoff from the rain gardens and will be filtered before hitting the lake. A protective easement of 3.5 acres will be created for a natural area for the future. Todd Polifka, President, Custom One Homes, LLC – He reported that the market is good for this type of development. These type of homes (detached villa townhomes) are typically sold to people 49 to 70 years old with two people living in the homes who are probably snow birds with not a lot of traffic. It will be heavily landscaped with plenty of trees. He stated that he does not see parking concerns. The snow in these types of developments is removed from the area and is included in HOA fees. Chair Melander asks if there are any questions from the commissioners. Commissioner Scanlon – Could you do the buffer zone with the single-family home verses showing everything right down to the lake line with the properties? Mark Sonstegard, GMH Land Company – Yes, he said he could provide the information. We have not been able to make the financials work for the single- family homes. If you have a single-family home on a lake, you are going to want CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes December 16, 2020 Page 5 of 12 your own lake access. We are targeting the empty nester who likes the idea of living on a lake but not necessarily Lake People but like the option of a kayak or pontoon they can take out every now and then. Commissioner Scanlon – What type of materials are you looking at for the retaining walls? I’m worried about replacing the material. Mark Sonstegard, GMH Land Company – The plan will be to use the boulder wall. Boulders are the best to work with in natural areas, adjust to the layout, and survive longer over time if engineered and installed correctly. Commissioner Burke – What about the hammerhead – it was discussed this was not acceptable? Is it possible to lose a unit in order to make a proper turnaround? Mark Sonstegard, GMH Land Company – We need to add another 13 feet to the end of that hammerhead. By moving it a little bit to the north or adding it another way. We will review with engineering to make it work. Chair Melander asks if there are any questions from the public. Bill Sherry, 4855 Dominica Way – President of Farquar Lake Association. I’m speaking for everyone (19 homes) who live on the lake and owns property - pages 88 to 101 of the agenda packet written for your consideration. Everyone in the association oppose the rezoning to this type of development. Development within the existing zoning of R1 and overlay shoreline regulations is expected but not 17 townhouses separated by 15 feet. We’re concerned what this does to the character and quality of Farquar Lake. It is beautiful. It is like this because of the current zoning of R1 with 40,000 square feet minimum (.92 acre) with 150 feet width. One of the builders stated that financially could not make single-family homes work. Chair Melander – The Planning Committee does not consider the financial aspects of developments. Bill Sherry, 4855 Dominica Way – Okay. I get it. In order to build on these lots with all of the environmental regulations, they need to build 17 houses 15 feet apart. Most people want to live there to enjoy the lake. There are very few homes that have a beach. Double driveways times 17 are 34 places for cars and 34 more parking spaces on the street which might not be enough for big family gatherings, etc. If there were 6 single-family homes we would not be talking about parking on the street. The 17 townhomes are right together. It looks like 85 to 95 percent gets graded. We ask you to turn down this request for the re-zoning. Trees being cut down will account for 75 percent then adding 10 percent back in which will be small trunked trees. The argument that this development is better for the environment than 6 single-family homes just doesn’t make sense. We ask you to discount that. The removal of natural vegetation will be restricted in order to CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes December 16, 2020 Page 6 of 12 preserve the shore-line aesthetics. It matters to water quality when a larger development is built around a lake. The natural environment matters. Follow the existing zoning requirements because the financials work out better and that underlies the request that is here today. If you are not confident and certain that it will not diminish the quality of the environment, to squeeze 17 townhomes will change the character and this development will diminish the natural habitat. This is a dangerous precedent to be setting. I ask the Planning Commission to turn this down. Joe Elliott, 12949 Diamond Path – It’s a beautiful place; we intended to retire there. The environment has not changed. The rezoning of this area is to the benefit of the seller and the builder. When this is done, they move on and the residents have to deal with it. These beautiful new homes are ghastly in this environment. I hope that you will not let this happen. Mark Wilson, 4845 Dominica Way – Described his home and the changes that have occurred during this time. In a major rain event, the lake raised 6 feet. The development of the Lake for our property has not been good. The quality of the lake used to be good, but with all the run off the Lake is murky and not of good quality. All that dirt is going to run into the lake during construction. The rain gardens will not be able to handle it. Clear cutting all those trees it will take another 30 to 40 years for the trees to reach the fullness they are in now. The development will cause more erosion and degradation to the lake. This is a gem of a lake and the City needs to protect it. The DNR approved it but it is consistent with the minimum standards. Governments are encouraged to consider higher standards and not the minimum standards. You need to reject it. Sharon Cartwright, 4865 Dominica Way – My place of peace. Don’t take these great blue herrings, egrets, owls, eagles away. We feed the wood ducks and take care of the birds and land. When you take 75 percent of them and put up 2 ½ inch twigs, what is going to happen to all of these birds? It is up to us to truly preserve it so this wildlife can survive. We put in rain gardens, shoreline restoration, work with the city and county, we watch the people walking by (especially since COVID) enjoying nature. Don’t let this go away for this might never come back. I have no dock or beach and when I look across the lake, it is so peaceful. I can understand 6 single homes but I cannot understand 17. Randy Buller, 15654 Egret Place – We are home/land owners of Farquar Lake. In 2017, we created a 7 single family plot. We determined that there was a better approach to benefit Farquar Lake. Keep the facts in mind when discussing the merits of this plan. We value lake quality. Many of the homes have minimal tree coverage or tree space. Several homes have large sand beaches. Many homes have homes sloping towards the lake not stopping the erosion. This proposed development has greater setbacks with 133 feet from the shoreline. On average, 92 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes December 16, 2020 Page 7 of 12 feet exists right now today. Greater buffering of 100 feet – minimum to low in regards to the other homes on the lake. Of the lakeshore frontage, 94.5 percent is permanently reserved as an outlot for perpetuity. Nothing will change that for it is under an HOA and cannot make more beaches, docs, cut down anything or walk through that. It is protected. Less than 5 percent is used for one beach and a dock. The DNR and City staff have commented: “. . . provides better shoreline protection than conventional lot and block subdivisions containing riparian lots. Riparian lots each with their own access and water recreational areas have significantly greater impacts to shore land and aquatic resources than those with subdivisions with large protected shore land areas and no ripairin lots, which the Cove would provide.” This is a powerful fact based endorsement for this project’s design and its ability to positively impact lake quality verses the R1. As the Farquar Lake Association comments noted: “The very purpose of the zoning requirements is to preserve and maintain the character and the quality of the neighborhood and the community.” The proposed plat exceeds the standards by nearly every quantifiable metric including lakeshore preservation, water quality management, minimal dock and boat usage, guided density, and open and preserved space. A traditional R1 project would not provide these protections. The DNR approved the plat for this project. One-third of the lots on Lake Farquar do not conform to the lot requirements: 1 1/2 acre to 3 acres, which are not consistent to R1 overlay and zoning. Many homes have marginal and minimal tree coverage. Many homes have minimal undisturbed natural space. Several homes have large sand beach areas and yards which slope down to the lake with little to assist with erosion. It does not appear to be a consistent R1 zoning. The Cove plan will have the most controlled undisturbed natural space and trees than any other property on that lake today. We respectfully ask the City Planning Commission to take the information we presented. Michelle Schreifels, 13200 Pilot Knob Rd – We support Farquar Lake association. We’ve lived here for 16 years. We acknowledge living on the lake is a privilege not only for the individuals living there but also to the community to have this lake. There is definitely a place for high density. I live on the property that has been pictured with the large beach. We have lived on this property for 60 years. This beach was intact when we moved onto the property. We have 700 feet of lake shore and about a 15 to 20 foot buffer around almost the entire property that is natural and treed with the exception of where the beach is. There is an area where the DNR approved us to use large boulders as a retainer as we have a point that results in a lot of loss of soil into the lake and causes more damage to the lake. It will be difficult to protect the lake in the fragile building process. It is hard for me to understand 17 homes 15 feet apart positively impacts this property. My home is buffered to protect the lake shore. It is a storm water drainage area, we have already caused enough damage. Can you guarantee these 17 homes will not continue to damage the lake? Let’s not make this about people but about preserving our planet and make sure we are doing the right thing by putting that type of housing in there. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes December 16, 2020 Page 8 of 12 Sara Nick, 13199 Diamond Path – I’ve lived there for 6 years. I agree with the Farquar Lake Association. We have had ample opportunity first hand to see all of the wild life of that property. I do not see how 1 acre will provide enough space for these wild animals. The water quality is a concern. It feels like we are being presented with a false choice for single-family homes instead of doing something with the single-family homes that will keep the preservation of the shoreline. I dispute the market for the single family’s wanting to buy property without having access to a beach, etc. That is why we purchased this property for our family with that quality of life we desired. Brent Hislop, 6000 Strawberry Lane Shorewood, MN – I have a question for Brandon, City Engineer regarding the conversation of single-family verses villa. Would the grading required for an R1 plat be of similar area and scope for the grading proposed under this plat? City Engineer Brandon Anderson -- This particular site has many challenges such as connecting to city utilities, providing street access, etc. To meet the regulatory and ordinance requirements either way (17 lots or 7 single-family) the site would be substantially graded for both. Brent Hislop, 6000 Strawberry Lane Shorewood, MN – So the similar grading for the site under either proposal would be similar tree loss for both options? Is that fair enough? City Engineer Brandon Anderson – Yes, that’s fair enough due to the particulars of grading this lot. Brent Hislop, 6000 Strawberry Lane Shorewood, MN – Kathy, if the site was straight zoning R1, would the 3 ½ acre outlot protection conservation area be required under straight zoning? Planner Bodmer – Mr. Chair, I would like to put that down as a question and bring back a good answer for you. Brent Hislop, 6000 Strawberry Lane Shorewood, MN – Okay, fair enough. Brent Hislop, 6000 Strawberry Lane Shorewood, MN – Another one for Mr. Anderson. So the applicant provided engineering standards for rain fall, ponding, 100 year event, we didn’t touch on those for it is a deep dive into the engineering side. Would it be fair to say that the site meets and exceeds those ponding water quality and rate control items? City Engineer Brandon Anderson – The storm water report received from the applicant shows that it is meeting or exceeding the storm water management requirements set forth in our ordinance. There are still a few details to work out on CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes December 16, 2020 Page 9 of 12 a few items but it is meeting the storm water requirements. Brent Hislop, 6000 Strawberry Lane Shorewood, MN – This is addressed to Mark the applicant. Regarding the GIS rough calculations along the shoreline of Farquar Lake, is it fairly accurate to say that based on the GIS overview that roughly 50 percent of the existing shoreline is not protected. It is either open space, wooded area and are non-buffered or otherwise, based on a quick overview? Mark Sonstegard, GMH Land Company – Looking around the lake from a GIS mapping point and measuring how much lake shore looks like a buffer or wooded area or beach or lawn right down to the lake, it is my rough calculations there were somewhere around 50 percent looking at the county GIS map. I did not go out on- site for verification. Brent Hislop, 6000 Strawberry Lane Shorewood, MN – It was previously noted that 94.5 percent of the shoreline area is said to be preserved. Ryan Bluhm, Westwood Professional Services, 792 Sunset Dr – I did the civil design for all the storm water and pretreatment for the streets. If there are any further questions for storm water design, I can answer those questions. The goal here is not to just meet the requirements but to exceed the requirements. We added buffers before the rain gets to the raingardens and continue to work with staff to make sure that the water quality is maintained. Carolyn Buhler, 15654 Egret Place – When we presented the 7 lots and were planning on living in the existing Houston home then selling the 6 lots, that proposal was met with a lot of hostility from the neighborhood as well. When we proposed that at that time, there would be clear cutting of the land as well. Mark Wilson, 4845 Dominica Way – There is no way that 50 percent of the shoreline is open. Come to the lake yourself and look. It is way more than 50 percent. Single-family homes would not want large trees to be cut down; they would want them preserved. That would be one of the main reasons they would want that lot. There being no further comments, Chair Melander closed the public hearing. B. Apple Valley Square 6th Addition, Chase Bank with Drive-Through at Car Apple Valley Square LLC Planner Alex Sharpe presented the staff report. Chair Melander asks if there are any questions from the commissioners. Commissioner Kurtz– Question about the traffic. It looks like at the four-way stop by Chipotle is a right-in only and a right-out only? Is that correct? CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes February 3, 2021 Page 3 of 6 B. The Cove - PC20-20-ZSB Planner Kathy Bodmer presented the staff report. Community Development Director Nordquist provided an existing picture tour of the lake, from the lake, emphasizing that the horizon shows trees, single homes, and not a compact placement of homes in close proximity. Chair Melander asked if there are any questions from the commissioners. Commissioner Burke asked what benefits the city would get from having 17 detached townhome lots as opposed to the previously proposed 7 detached single- family lots. Planner Bodmer stated the benefit from this negotiation would be the ability to cluster the homes together and allow larger open space and a greater natural buffer zone. A second benefit would be that the developer would need to comply with up-to-date requirements of the Shoreland Overlay zoning district. The developers have had close contact with the DNR for review. Commissioner Scanlan raised concerns about the long-term maintenance of the shore impact zone and what this area could look like in the future with different residents moving in and out. Planner Bodmer stated that some of the features of the site would be easements such as the infiltration areas and basins. This development requires the homeowner’s association to address long-term maintenance. The City is working with the City Attorney’s office who advises it is better to work with the homeowner’s association. City Attorney Sharon Hills stated that the shoreline impact zone is under the DNR rules currently and is not in the city’s shoreline regulations. These provisions could be added to the ordinance. Commissioner Scanlan raised additional concerns regarding snow removal and the private drive as well as apprehension over parking on one side of the street. The hammerhead on one end would provide difficulty for emergency vehicles and likely the plan would need to lose a unit or two to allow for additional off-street parking. Planner Bodmer advised that the Fire Marshall is now asking the ends be dedicated as a fire lane giving more authority for police to ticket and tow. The CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes February 3, 2021 Page 4 of 6 hammerhead is also allowed in the fire code as long as the dimensions are adequate. Commissioner Schindler stated the use of the site did not feel appropriate. There would be a lot of disruption in clearing this site and there are no properties similar to what is being proposed around Lake Farquar. Commissioner Schindler stated there would be an advantage to having one access to the lake, but does not believe the dramatic change to the area around the lake would be the best use. Planner Bodmer said whether the site would be approved for townhomes or single-family homes, this much grading would need to be done with just as much site disruption. Commissioner Schindler asked what street would be needed if the site had 7 single-family lots. Planner Bodmer replied that the single-family lots would not be able to have driveway access to Diamond Path and construction of a street would be needed to service those homes. A case for rezoning would still be needed. Commissioner Kurtz shared that she had recently been around the lake and that the site seemed too small for accommodating 17 townhome units but could see 7 single-family lots working and would like to see the natural beauty remain. Chair Melander expressed concern over accommodating residents who wish to live on larger lots. He mentions the 80% grading, over 200 trees needing to be taken out, and the fragility of the lake being a large concern over this proposal. Chair Melander stated he had no inclination to rezone the area. The Petitioner (Mark Sonstegard of JMH Land) shared a brief presentation regarding erosion control for the site which includes the grading plan, inspections by the state, city and Westwood, as well as stabilization. Chair Melander asked if there were any further questions/comments. Commissioner Burke asked whether this particular plan would be implemented in another part of a R1 zone, would we be considering this amount of lots? Chair Melander asked if this development should be revisited at the next meeting on February 17th. Planner Bodmer replied yes. I T E M: 6.A. P L A NNI NG C O MMI S S I O N ME E T I NG D AT E:March 17, 2021 S E C T I O N:Other Business Description: Review of Upcoming S chedule and Other Updates S taff Contact: B reanna Vincent, Department Assistant Department / Division: Community Development Department AC T I O N RE Q UE S T E D: N/A S UM M ARY: Next P lanning Commission Meetings: Wednesday, April 7, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. Public hearing applications due by 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday, March 10, 2021. Site plan, variance applications due by 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday, March 24, 2021. Wednesday, April 21, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. Public hearing applications due by 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday, March 17, 2021. Site plan, variance applications due by 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday, April 7, 2021. Next City Council Meetings: T hursday, March 25, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. T hursday, April 8, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. B AC K G RO UND: N/A B UD G E T I M PAC T: N/A