HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/25/2011 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
Dakota County, Minnesota
August 25, 2011
Minutes of the regular meeting of the City Council of Apple Valley, Dakota County, Minnesota,
held August 25, 2011, at 8:00 o'clock p.m., at Apple Valley Municipal Center.
PRESENT: Mayor Hamann - Roland; Councilmembers Bergman, Grendahl, and Hooppaw.
ABSENT: Councilmember Goodwin.
City staff members present were: City Administrator Lawell, Deputy City Clerk Murphy, City
Attorney Dougherty, Public Works Director Blomstrom, Associate City Planner Bodmer,
Assistant City Administrator Grawe, Finance Director Hedberg, Parks and Recreation Director
Johnson, Police Chief Johnson, City Engineer Manson, Community Development Director
Nordquist, and Fire Chief Thompson.
Mayor Hamann - Roland called the meeting to order at 8:00 p.m. Everyone took part in the Pledge
of Allegiance led by Boy Scouts Perry Abdulkadir, John Barrington, Garrett Bromer, Ian Elliott,
Greg Gearing, Matt Harrington, and Tyler Steen from Troop 292.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
MOTION: of Grendahl, seconded by Bergman, approving the agenda for tonight's meeting, as
presented. Ayes - 4 - Nays - 0.
AUDIENCE
Mayor Hamann- Roland asked if anyone was present to address the Council, at this time, on any
item not on this meeting's agenda. No one requested to speak.
CONSENT AGENDA
Mayor Hamann - Roland asked if the Council or anyone in the audience wished to pull any item
from the consent agenda. There were no requests.
MOTION: of Grendahl, seconded by Hooppaw, approving all items on the consent agenda
with no exceptions. Ayes - 4 - Nays - 0.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
MOTION: of Grendahl, seconded by Hooppaw, approving the minutes of the regular meeting
of August 11, 2011, as written. Ayes - 3 - Nays - 0 - Abstain - 1 (Hamann- Roland).
MOTION: of Grendahl, seconded by Hooppaw, adopting Resolution No. 2011 -120 amending
the 2011 On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License and Special License for Sunday
Liquor Sales for Blazing Wings, Inc., d/b /a Buffalo Wild Wings Grill & Bar, at
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
Dakota County, Minnesota
August 25, 2011
Page 2
14658 Cedar Avenue, Suite. D, by extending the licensed premises. Ayes - 4 -
Nays - 0.
MOTION: of Grendahl, seconded by Hooppaw, adopting Resolution No. 2011 -121 setting a
public hearing, at 8:00 p.m., on September 22, 2011, on the application for On -Sale
Intoxicating Liquor and Special License for Sunday Liquor Sales by Spoon, Inc.,
d/b /a Spoon, at 14871 Granada Avenue. Ayes - 4 - Nays - 0.
MOTION: of Grendahl, seconded by Hooppaw, approving the installation of two additional
street lights along 14200 and 14300 blocks of Hemlock Court, funded from the
Street Light Utility Fund. Ayes - 4 - Nays - 0.
MOTION: of Grendahl, seconded by Hooppaw, approving the Agreement with CFT
Developments, LLC, for Installing Storm Sewer, Repairing Intersection, and
Adjusting Grade of Driveway on Pennock Avenue, as attached to the Public Works
Director's memo dated August 25, 2011, and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk
to sign the same. Ayes - 4 - Nays - 0.
MOTION: of Grendahl, seconded by Hooppaw, approving the Agreement with Tom -Don Real
Estate Holdings, Inc., for Installing Storm Sewer, Repairing Intersection, and
Adjusting Grade of Driveway on Pennock Avenue, as attached to the Public Works
Director's memo dated August 25, 2011, and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk
to sign the same. Ayes - 4 - Nays - 0.
MOTION: of Grendahl, seconded by Hooppaw, adopting Resolution No. 2011 -122 amending
the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map adding a temporary sand and
gravel overlay. Ayes - 4 - Nays - 0.
MOTION: of Grendahl, seconded by Hooppaw, waiving the procedure for a second reading
and passing Ordinance No. 925 amending Chapter 150 of the City Code regulating
completion deadlines for exterior work. Ayes - 4 - Nays - 0.
MOTION: of Grendahl, seconded by Hooppaw, adopting Resolution No. 2011 -123 setting a
public hearing, at 8:00 p.m., on September 22, 2011, to consider vacating a portion
of utility easement on Lot 1, Block 16, Cedar Knolls. Ayes - 4 - Nays - 0.
MOTION: of Grendahl, seconded by Hooppaw, adopting Resolution No. 2011 -124 awarding
the contract for AV Project 2011 -104, 2011 Utility Improvements, to McNamara
Contracting, Inc., the lowest responsible bidder, in the amount of $354,677.50.
Ayes -4- Nays -0.
MOTION: of Grendahl, seconded by Hooppaw, approving Change Order No. 1 to the contract
with Geislinger and Sons, Inc., for AV Project 2011 -108, Sanitary Lift Station 2
Replacement, in the amount of an additional $9,228.69. Ayes - 4 - Nays - 0.
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
Dakota County, Minnesota
August 25, 2011
Page 3
MOTION: of Grendahl, seconded by Hooppaw, accepting Sports Arena Rubber Flooring at
Apple Valley Sports Arena as complete and authorizing final payment on the
agreement with Arena Systems, in the amount of $24,850.00. Ayes - 4 - Nays - 0.
MOTION: of Grendahl, seconded by Hooppaw, approving hiring the seasonal and part -time
employees, as listed in the Personnel Report and Addendum dated August 25,
2011. Ayes - 4 - Nays - 0.
END OF CONSENT AGENDA
MCNAMARA CONTRACTING PROPERTIES
Ms. Bodmer introduced a request from McNamara Contracting Properties, LLC, and the City of
Apple Valley as co- applicants. This request is asking for consideration of a Comprehensive Plan
Amendment from "LD" (Low Density Residential) to "IND" (Industrial), rezoning from "SG"
(Sand & Gravel) to "I -1" (Limited Industrial), preliminary plat of McNamara Addition and
vacation of various easements. The existing McNamara site consists of two parcels totaling 10.4-
acres. The properties are currently guided for "LD" (Low Density Residential) development and
zoned "SG" (Sand and Gravel).
The City is working with McNamara Contracting Properties, LLC, to obtain the necessary right -
of -way to extend Flagstaff Avenue south to 147th Street West. The McNamara property is
encumbered with a number of pipeline and utility easements which make development of the
property difficult. The City will be purchasing the southern parcel in order to complete the
Flagstaff Avenue project because a large portion of the southern property was needed to
accommodate the Flagstaff Avenue alignment and the large easements left the remaining property
nearly unbuildable.
The property owner wishes to rezone the property to an industrial designation to allow the existing
use of the property to remain as it is today as an office /warehouse building. The petitioner has no
plans at this time to redevelop the property.
Ms. Bodmer reviewed the questions and concerns raised at the public hearings for the McNamara
project held on August 3, 2011, and August 17, 2011, Planning Commission meetings.
She stated the Planning Commission asked staff to prepare a drawing not only displaying the
easements on the property but also the set -backs because there are larger than typical set - backs.
The parcel is quite constraint. There is other land available in the City zoned industrial so it is not
likely someone will choose this site for redevelopment when other sites are available.
Councilmember Bergman asked if Footbridge Way would butt up to Flagstaff Avenue.
Ms. Bodmer replied no and that it would only butt up to the west property line.
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
Dakota County, Minnesota
August 25, 2011
Page 4
Councilmember Bergman asked why the two streets would not be connected. He asked for
clarification as to why there would be green space between them.
Ms. Bodmer stated that based on the information collected at the public hearing the neighborhood
is very concerned about cut through traffic to Eastview High School if Footbridge Way were to be
extended. If the City could go without extending Footbridge Way, that would be the preference of
the neighborhood residents.
Councilmember Bergman asked if there was concern from residents regarding traffic and noise
with Flagstaff Avenue being extended.
Mr. Blomstrom answered that typically the City tries to tie projects together that would produce a
financial advantage. If there are challenges in extending Footbridge Way that would be
advantageous to the City to address now, that would rise to a higher level in the City's
consideration. The terrain is fairly flat to the south so there is not a cost advantage to extending
Footbridge Way at this time but could tie it to another project in the future. Regarding noise, there
is a terrain difference to the west with the land rising up from 6 feet to 12 or 15 feet and then it
drops back down into the Cedar Isles development. He feels that really is the best way at
minimizing noise. Some of the land farther south is under the city's control and would allow the
City to plant screening in the future.
Mayor Hamann- Roland asked for clarification if there would be connectivity by bike and foot
traffic but not by auto between Footbridge Way and Flagstaff Avenue.
Ms. Bodmer said the City is exploring as to install a path from Footbridge Way to Flagstaff
Avenue and that would provide pedestrian and bicycle access to the high school as well as to
Johnny Cake Ridge Park.
She stated the City would be installing a 6 -foot high privacy fence on the west and south sides of
the property of Lot 1. This fence would provide a buffer between the land use and the
neighborhood in addition to the natural buffer of the berm discussion by Mr. Blomstrom.
Mayor Hamann- Roland asked if the planned fence would be constructed at the top of the berm.
Mr. Blomstrom answered that the proposed fence would be placed along the west line of the north
parcel which would be the building on the McNamara property. The fence would be located on
the top of the berm and would be a solid wood fence and not the chain linked fence as there is
today.
The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval at their August 17, 2011,
meeting. Recommended actions would be to adopt the resolution authorizing the submission of
the comprehensive plan amendment from "LD" Low Density Residential to "IND" (Industrial) to
the Metropolitan Council, withholding action on the rezoning and preliminary plat until the Met
Council acts on the Comp Plan amendment request, and adopting a resolution setting the public
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
Dakota County, Minnesota
August 25, 2011
Page 5
hearing to consider vacation of various easements at the September 22, 2011, City Council
meeting.
Councilmember Grendahl asked for a historical perspective on the property. She questions if the
McNamara property is in compliance now.
Ms. Bodmer confirmed that they are not.
Councilmember Grendahl stated that the City has had issues with the property owner in the past.
She questioned if the City is complying with them instead of them complying with the City.
Ms. Bodmer said the issue in 2006 and prior that the property owner did approach a developer to
see if they could lay out the property for low density development. They found that because of
the small size of the property as well as the easements, they found that residential developers were
not interested in the property.
Councilmember Grendahl stated she has had phone calls on this property since 1997 that the
property owners are not in compliance with what the zoning is. She takes issue with the fact that
there has never been compliance from the property owner. She asked why the City would be
paying for the fence.
Mr. Blomstrom answered that if the City would be paying for the fence it would allow the City to
make the decision on what kind of fence to install. The City would want a fence installed that is
good quality, low maintenance, and will stand up over the years. He said as part of the negotiation
process the City agreed to pay for the fence.
Councilmember Grendahl questioned if the City is negotiating with the property owner now when
they are not in compliance with the land use. She stated the City is paying for fences and buying
property and questioned what the City is getting out of this.
Mr. Lawell stated that one of the issues the City has been dealing with that dates back to the 1990s
was not when the property was in it current condition but when it was occupied by Tri -State
Machinery. That property in the older times was a problem property. There were rusting parts
from the old sand and gravel operations in that quadrant of the City. As the sand and gravel left
the materials accumulated. Past complaints were why was this property allowed to exist in an
industrial state long after sand and gravel had departed that part of the City. The site was cleaned
up when Tri -State Machinery moved out. The City is dealing with a different set of circumstances
today than when it received those complaints. As the building is occupied currently, he does not
believe there is any type of industrial use going on. Some office space is now used in the building.
What has prompted this is Council's direction to get Flagstaff Avenue running north and south
across that property connecting from 140th Street down into downtown as well as getting 147th
Street extended to the east.
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
Dakota County, Minnesota
August 25, 2011
Page 6
Councilmember Grendahl questioned why Flagstaff Avenue could not be extended without
rezoning. She stated roads are put through in other areas of the City and asked why it is an issue
now.
Mr. Lawell stated the lot is an odd configuration. The south parcel wraps around the east side and
the north side. It is not a clean situation to go in there and secure property for a road. Also, the
southern property is really unbuildable due to the size and shape.
Councilmember Grendahl asked how much the City is paying for the property and how much the
fence will cost.
Mr. Blomstrom stated it is based on an appraisal and approximately $240,000.00 to purchase the
southern half of the property and about $3,000.00 to build the fence.
Councilmember Grendahl stated that if the property is worth $240,000.00 it is obviously not
worthless property. She questioned if it is considered unbuildable how it could be worth
$240,000.00. She asked what kind of comps are used in today's standards.
Mr. Blomstrom stated that the real challenge is with the appraised value of the parcel as it sits
today. The challenge is to acquire the right -of -way for Flagstaff Avenue and that the parcel is
severed by the pipeline and acquiring the land because Flagstaff Avenue curves through the
southern parcel has really attributed to the southern portion not being buildable.
Councilmember Grendahl questioned if we had an estimate for acquiring just the property for the
road.
Mr. Blomstrom stated the appraisal was not broken down by just the square footage for the right -
of -way. He said the challenge is when you look at a parcel to acquire right -of -way and only a
corner is clipped, you look at things on a per square footage.
Mayor Hamann- Roland commented that the southeast corner of the parcel will remain green
space. She feels the neighborhood will benefit from this green space because this area will not be
developed.
Mr. Blomstrom agreed but from an appraisal standpoint you question if the City is doing a total
take on a property because it has taken so much land.
Councilmember Grendahl asked when the 60 days is up and if we are under a deadline this
evening.
Ms. Bodmer stated the City has submitted a letter to the property owner notifying them the City is
exercising the option to extend another 60 days.
Councilmember Grendahl questioned how many votes it would take to approve submittal of the
Comp Plan amendment if she did not feel comfortable voting on it this evening.
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
Dakota County, Minnesota
August 25, 2011
Page 7
Ms. Bodmer clarified that the authorization to submit to the Met Council is a simple majority.
Once it comes back from the Met Council then a super majority is needed for approval on the
Comprehensive Plan amendment. She stated the application was made July 1, 2011, and the 120
days would be up the end of October.
Councilmember Grendahl inquired with the extension if the City really does have until November.
Mr. Dougherty stated that in terms of a land use item, the 60 -day clock got extended by the letter
from the City and because the Met Council is involved it also stops the clock. There will be an
additional extension based on the length of time the Met Council has to make this decision.
Councilmember Hooppaw asked for clarification if staff considered acquiring the space needed for
the roadway versus acquiring the entire Outlot A.
Mr. Blomstrom stated that when the City met with the owners of the southern parcel and we
showed them the amount of land needed for the right -of -way, they reached the conclusion that the
taking of that easement does not leave enough land to make anything of the southern parcel. We
always just appraise the total value from the beginning.
Councilmember Hooppaw asked if the $240,000.00 is the cost for the right -of -way for the road
and Outlot A.
Mr. Blomstrom confirmed it was. He said he does not have the purchase agreement with him this
evening but can provide that information later.
Councilmember Bergman inquired if the City had any discussion with the Met Council on this.
Mr. Nordquist answered that whenever there is a change or request to shift from Low Density
Residential to Industrial that will raise attention at the Met Council but it should not raise concern
from them. He feels the Met Council will give it their due consideration but does not believe it is
of exceptional concern.
Mayor Hamann- Roland asked Councilmember Grendahl if she was comfortable sending the
request to the Met Council.
Councilmember Grendahl stated the City just turned in the Comprehensive Plan last year. She
inquired what happened from last year to this year.
Ms. Bodmer stated there were a number of properties that were inconsistent with each other and
the McNamara Property was one of those identified. When the City initiated the interest of
rezoning the property to Low Density the owners were opposed to it. They wanted to sit down
and work with the City on it.
Councilmember Grendahl asked if this could be postponed for two weeks.
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
Dakota County, Minnesota
August 25, 2011
Page 8
Mr. Blomstrom stated if Council felt they needed two weeks we could manage with that.
Motion: of Grendahl to table for two weeks. Motion died for lack of a second.
Councilmember Bergman said to Councilmember Grendahl that this will only be going to the Met
Council for approval. He then asked Mr. Blomstrom if we were in a project deadline.
Mr. Blomstrom stated the City's goal was to try have this project under contract this fall yet or
perhaps get some preliminary work done and then the majority of the construction in 2012 so it is
completed in that year. Negotiations and the process has pushed that back. We would still like to
move as quickly as we can so it is complete by 2012. He said they can make adjustments for two
weeks if needed but to keep the process moving with all the things in play, review from Met
Council, acquisitions, and the closing on the purchase of the property, we are trying to keep
everything running parallel to the extent that we can.
Councilmember Bergman questioned if the Met Council had a time frame they had to get back to
us.
Ms. Bodmer stated the City's expectation is that this would be a minor plan amendment so they
could do that on a staff level rather than have the full Met Council review it. She feels if it is
minor amendment it could take 4 -6 weeks for them to process.
Councilmember Bergman asked if we delay for two more weeks then we could be looking out to
December 2011.
Mr. Blomstrom stated we would have then lost the construction season for 2011. He said the City
is trying to synchronize this project because there are a number of projects on the schedule for
2012. He said any degree we can keep this project moving is an advantage to the City.
Mayor Hamann- Roland stated with the time frame she feels Council needs to move on it tonight.
MOTION: of Hooppaw, seconded by Bergman, adopting Resolution 2011 -125 approving an
amendment to the Land Use Map of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan from "LD"
(Low Density Residential, 3 -6 units /acre) to "IND" (Industrial), and authorizing
submittal to the Metropolitan Council. Ayes - 3 - Nays —1 (Grendahl).
MOTION: of Bergman, seconded by Hooppaw, adopting Resolution 2011 -126 setting a
public hearing, at 8:00 p.m., on September 22, 2011, to consider vacating
easements on the McNamara property in accordance with the attachments. Ayes -
4- Nays -0.
STAFF COMMUNICATION
Mr. Blomstrom provided an update on the Cedar Avenue transitway construction project.
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
Dakota County, Minnesota
August 25, 2011
Page 9
Mr. Thompson announced that the 34th Annual Booya will be held at Fire Station No. 1 on
September 17, 2011. There will be bingo and raffles with prizes donated from the community.
Mr. Johnson publicized the final dance in the summer concert series at Kelley Park will be held on
September 17, 2011, from 5:00 to 7:00 p.m.
Mr. Lawell informed everyone that Beyond the Yellow Ribbon Campaign kicks off at the Apple
Valley American Legion on September 19, 2011, at 6:30 p.m.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
Councilmember Grendahl said that on August 29, 2011, the Apple Valley American Legion will
be hosting the Four Corners event which has the potential of approximately 5,000 people.
Councilmember Grendahl shared that she and Councilmember Hooppaw attended the disaster
training exercise on August 13, 2011, and it was a great experience.
CALENDAR OF UPCOMING EVENTS
MOTION: of Hooppaw, seconded by Grendahl, approving the calendar of upcoming events as
included in the City Clerk's memo dated August 22, 2011, and noting that each
event listed is hereby deemed a Special Meeting of the City Council. Ayes - 4 -
Nays - 0.
CLAIMS AND BILLS
MOTION: of Bergman, seconded by Grenhdahl, to pay the claims and bills, check registers
dated August 17, 2011, in the amount of $735,833.06; and August 24, 2011, in the
amount of $951,859.82. Ayes - 4 - Nays - 0.
MOTION: of Bergman, seconded Grendahl, to adjourn. Ayes - 4 - Nays - 0.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:15 o'clock p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
Jo. , e Murphy, Deputy City Cl
Approved by the Apple Valley City Council on q- , -11