Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/03/2021 Agenda Packet M eeting L ocation: M unicipal Center 7100 147th Street West Apple Valley, M innesota 55124 The Planning C ommission meeting is both a web broadcast and on a virtual access template to allow remote public participation. The meeting is always open to the public at the Municipal C enter. Nov ember 3, 2021 PLA N N IN G C O MMISSIO N T EN TAT IVE A G EN D A 7:00 P M 1.Call to Order 2.Approve Agenda 3.Approve Consent Agenda Items Consent Agenda Items are considered routine and will be enacted with a single motion, without discussion, unless a commissioner or citizen requests to have any item separately considered. It will then be moved to the land use/action items for consideration. A.Approve Minutes of October 20, 2021, Regular Meeting B.Set the 2022 Planning C ommission Regular Meeting Schedule 4.Public Hearings A.Ordinances Amending "SH" (Shoreland Overlay) Zoning District - PC20- 12-Z 1. C onsider ordinance amending C ity Code Chapter 155 (Zoning) concerning "SH" (Shoreland Overlay) zoning district. 2. C onsider amendment to zoning map for 11 properties abutting Keller Lake. Location: City-Wide Petitioner: City of Apple Valley B.U-Haul Request to Amend Planned Development 254, C onditional Use Permit for Exterior Storage, and Site Plan/Building Permit Authorization 5.Land Use / Action Items A.C hick-fil-a C anopy Variances - PC 21-27-V 1. Reduce setback from 153rd Street West from 40' to 10' to construct 1,280 sq. ft. canopy over the double drive-thru lanes. 2. Reduce setback from Cedar Avenue from 50' to 21' to construct 768 sq. ft. canopy over the meal pick up area. Location: 7480 - 153rd Street West Applicant: Chick-fil-a Inc. B.Planning Commission Animal Ordinance Recommendations 6.Other Business A.Review of Upcoming Schedule and Other Updates Planning Commission - Wednesday, December 1, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. Planning Commission - Wednesday, December 15, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. C ity Council - Tuesday, November 9, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. C ity Council - Tuesday, November 23, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. 7.Adjourn Regular meetings are broadcast, live, on C harter C ommunications C able C hannel 180 and on the C ity's website at www.cityof applevalley.org I T E M: 3.A. P L A NNI NG C O MMI S S I O N ME E T I NG D AT E:November 3, 2021 S E C T I O N:Consent A genda Description: A pprove Minutes of October 20, 2021, Regular Meeting S taff Contact: B reanna Vincent, Department Assistant Department / Division: Community Development Department AC T I O N RE Q UE S T E D: Approve minutes of regular meeting of October 20, 2021. S UM M ARY: T he minutes of the last regular Planning Commission meeting is attached for your review and approval. B AC K G RO UND: State statute requires the creation and preservation of meeting minutes which document the official actions and proceedings of public governing bodies. B UD G E T I M PAC T: N/A AT TAC HM E NT S : Minutes CITY OF APPLE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES October 20, 2021 1. CALL TO ORDER The City of Apple Valley Planning Commission Meeting was called to order by Acting Chair Kurtz at 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Jodi Kurtz, David Schindler, Paul Scanlan, Keith Deikmann, Philip Mahowald, Becky Sandahl Member(s) Absent: Tim Burke City staff members attending: Community Development Director Bruce Nordquist, City Attorney Sharon Hills, and Department Assistant Breanna Vincent. 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Acting Chair Kurtz asked if there were any changes to the agenda – None. MOTION: Commissioner Schindler moved, seconded by Commissioner Diekmann, approving the agenda. Roll call vote: Ayes - 6 – Nays - 0. 3. CONSENT ITEMS MOTION: Commissioner Diekmann moved, seconded by Commissioner Scanlan, approving the minutes of the meeting of October 6, 2021. Roll call vote: Ayes – 6 – Nays – 0. 4. PUBLIC HEARING A. Land Use Considerations for the Keeping of Chickens Community Development Director Bruce Nordquist presented the staff report. Acting Chair Kurtz opened the public hearing. Resident Jon Rechtzigel (13835 Flagstaff Ave.) spoke in opposition of keeping chickens in Apple Valley citing concerns over water sanitation, how the City will enforce the proposed regulations, salmonella infections, how names were gathered for the petition, and whether the staff tasked with consideration over chickens have a vested interest as they are not Apple Valley residents. Mr. Rechtzigel also commented that although some owners would be responsible, many others may not be. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes October 20, 2021 Page 2 of 4 CD Director Nordquist responded to the concerns over the petition signatures, saying there were 250 signatures of which 223 were Apple Valley residents, 27 from neighboring communities. The signatures represented 169 households. Resident Elizabeth Salaba-Sharma (12677 Emmer Ct.) spoke in support of keeping chickens in residential areas. Mrs. Salaba-Sharma is a new Apple Valley resident from St. Paul and she mentioned how neighbor approval is a condition required by St. Paul prior to getting chickens. She also said chickens would be a great option for families and especially kids to experience taking care of a pet other than a dog. Resident Laura Tramonte (14082 Flintwood Way) spoke in opposition of keeping chickens in residential areas mentioning a lot of residential properties have small lot sizes. Mrs. Tramonte also mentioned smell being an issue. Resident James Kump (13881 Fleetwood Ave.) stated that Minnesota has short summers for people to enjoy the outdoors and the last thing people want is to smell chickens. He also cited the small lot sizes being an issue. Farmington resident Calvin Cook provided information in support of keeping chickens citing personal experience with raising chickens at his home. Resident Suzie Meserow (7620 157th St. Unit C) stated she would like the option of keeping chickens. Acting Chair Kurtz asked if there were any virtual comments – None. Acting Chair Kurtz closed the public hearing. CD Director Nordquist asked if the Commission had any recommendations regarding setbacks and lot size. Acting Chair Kurtz stated she would prefer a 20’ setback as opposed to the proposed 10’ setback as well as requiring neighbor approval. City Attorney Hills advised that the Commission could offer recommendations/discussion at the next meeting of November 3rd. City Attorney Hills also added that the neighbor approval is not recommended to be included in the Ordinance as it must apply equally to all residents and not be dependent on whether the applicant has a nice or agreeable neighbor. Attorney Hills also stated that the Planning Commission will not be making any motions on the Draft Ordinance as it is not a zoning/land use issue and City Council will ultimately make the decision. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes October 20, 2021 Page 3 of 4 Acting Chair Kurtz asked if the Commission would like to make comments. Commissioner Scanlan raised concerns over all lots being given the same opportunity for chickens though some lots may not have adequate space for a chicken coop with meeting setback requirements. He also asked if HOAs would have the ability to restrict chickens. CD Director Nordquist stated that HOAs would have this ability. Commissioner Mahowald commented that the diagrams in the packets showing examples of lots and the possible location of the chicken coops have a 5’ setback shown though a 10’ setback is being proposed. CD Director Nordquist responded that the 5’ is demonstrating that nothing is allowed in that drainage and utility easement. The diagram then shows the 10’ measure to show the setback from the property lines. Commissioner Schindler stated that lot size will be difficult as the lots are so varied. He said that setbacks would be the best way. Commissioner Sandahl commented that the 20’ setback would help keeping the coops further away from neighbors’ homes and specifically decks. Commissioner Schindler recommended having someone take a recording at 10’ and 20’ away from a chicken coop to see how sound is impacted and help determine what setback is best. 5. LAND USE None 6. OTHER BUSINESS A. Review of Upcoming Schedule and Other Updates The next Planning Commission meeting is Wednesday, November 3, 2021, 7:00 p.m. The next City Council meeting is Thursday, October 28, 2021, 7:00 p.m. 7. ADJOURNMENT Hearing no further comments from the Planning Staff or Planning Commission, Acting Chair Kurtz asked for a motion to adjourn. MOTION: Commissioner Schindler moved, seconded by Commissioner Scanlan, to adjourn the meeting at 8:12 p.m. Roll call vote: Ayes – 6 – Nays – 0. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes October 20, 2021 Page 4 of 4 Respectfully submitted, ______________________________________ Breanna Vincent, Planning Department Assistant Approved by the Apple Valley Planning Commission on 11/03/2021 . Jodi Kurtz, Acting Chair I T E M: 3.B. P L A NNI NG C O MMI S S I O N ME E T I NG D AT E:November 3, 2021 S E C T I O N:Consent A genda Description: S et the 2022 Planning Commission Regular Meeting S chedule S taff Contact: B reanna Vincent, Planning Department Assistant Department / Division: Community Development Department AC T I O N RE Q UE S T E D: Set the 2022 Planning C ommission regular meeting schedule, in accordance with adopted policy, on the first and third Wednesdays of each month. S UM M ARY: In accordance with current policy, following is the tentative schedule of regular meetings for the year of 2022. T he calendar includes application deadlines. B AC K G RO UND: Agenda packet preparation will take place on Fridays preceding regular Planning Commission meetings. Regular meetings will be held on the first and third Wednesday of each month. B UD G E T I M PAC T: N/A AT TAC HM E NT S : Calendar s:\planning\private\plancomm\calendars\2022 draft.doc APPLE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION 2022 MEETING CALENDAR AND APPLICATION DEADLINES Meetings are held on the first and third Wednesdays of each month at 7:00 p.m. at the Apple Valley Municipal Center, 7100-147th Street West APPLICATION DEADLINE for Public Hearings: Rezonings, Subdivisions, Preliminary Plats, Conditional Use Permits, Comp Plan Amendments, Interim Use Permits Wednesday, 9:00 a.m. APPLICATION DEADLINE for Site Plan Reviews, Variances, Sketch Plans, etc. Wednesday, 9:00 a.m. MEETING DATE Wednesday, 7:00 p.m. December 8, 2021 December 22, 2021 January 5, 2022 January 19, 2022 February 2, 2022 February 16, 2022 March 9, 2022 March 23, 2022 April 6, 2022 April 20, 2022 May 4, 2022 May 18, 2022 June 22, 2022 July 6, 2022 July 20, 2022 August 10, 2022 August 24, 2022 September 7, 2022 September 21, 2022 October 5, 2022 November 9, 2022 November 23, 2022 December 22, 2021 January 5, 2022 January 19, 2022 February 2, 2022 February 16, 2022 March 2, 2022 March 23, 2022 April 6, 2022 April 20, 2022 May 4, 2022 May 18, 2022 June 1, 2022 July 6, 2022 July 20, 2022 August 3, 2022 August 24, 2022 September 7, 2022 September 21, 2022 October 5, 2022 October 19, 2022 November 23, 2022 December 7, 2022 January 5, 2022 January 19, 2022 February 2, 2022 February 16, 2022 March 2, 2022 Annual Mtg. March 16, 2022 April 6, 2022 April 20, 2022 May 4, 2022 May 18, 2022 June 1, 2022 June 15, 2022 July 20, 2022** August 3, 2022 August 17, 2022 September 7, 2022 September 21, 2022 October 5, 2022 October 19, 2022 November 2, 2022** December 7, 2022 December 21, 2022 * Odd date due to Holiday occurrence. ** Only one meeting this month. I T E M: 4.A. P L A NNI NG C O MMI S S I O N ME E T I NG D AT E:November 3, 2021 S E C T I O N:P ublic Hearings Description: Ordinances A mending "S H" (Shoreland Overlay) Z oning District - P C20-12-Z S taff Contact: K athy Bodmer, A I C P, Planner Department / Division: Community Development Department Applicant: City of Apple Valley P roject Number: Applicant Date: 60 Days: 120 Days: AC T I O N RE Q UE S T E D: Open public hearing, receive comments, close public hearing. It is the policy of the Planning Commission to not take action on an item on the same night as its public hearing. S UM M ARY: T he C ity of Apple Valley is the petitioner for this item and requests a public hearing to consider an ordinance amending the C ity's "SH" (Shoreland Overlay) zoning district. T he City is required by State law to ensure the the S H regulations match the current SH regulations as updated by the D N R. T he C ity's existing S H zoning district provisions have not been updated since 1988. T he draft ordinance will replace the existing SH zoning district requirements in its entirety. T he public hearing will also consider designating 11 properties abutting Keller Lake, within the SH zone. T he D N R has reviewed the draft ordinance and given "conditional approval." B AC K G RO UND: State Authority and City Requirements : T he Minnesota Department of N atural Resources regulates the State of Minnesota shorelands through MN Rules, Parts 6120.2500 - 6120.3900. State law requires cities and counties to comply with the the State rules by enacting SH zoning district requirements in compliance with the D N R Shoreland rules. Cities must adopt an ordinance that reflects the most recent requirements adopted by the D N R. A pple Valley's ordinance was last updated in 1988, so an update is needed. T he City is required to adopt an ordinance that is no less restrictive than the State's shoreland rules. "SH" (Shoreland Overlay) Zone: Properties that abut and/or are within a certain distance of public waters, as defined and regulated by Minnesota Shoreland Law, are designated and zoned "SH" (Shoreland Overlay) district. T he SH zone is an overlay or zone-on-zone zoning classification that does not change the existing zoning designation. T he SH zone provides additional development requirements in addition to the underlying zoning designation to help protect the C ity's lakes and natural resources. T he City's designated lakes, as classified by the D N R, include Alimagnet Lake, Long Lake and Farquar Lake as recreation development lakes, and Keller Lake, as a natural environment lake. Ordinance Amendment Provisions : T he draft ordinance fully replaces the City's existing SH district. T he ordinance is more technical than the C ity's existing ordinance with regard to development potential and analysis. In some ways the new ordinance is more restrictive than the previous ordinance, but there are some provisions that provide a bit more flexibility. Definitions - Definitions are established that relate to the SH zoning district. New definitions are established, such as bluff, boathouse, intensive vegetative clearing, ordinary high water level, shore impact zone, steep slope, suitability analysis and water- oriented structure. Terms used in SH regulations are defined. D N R Lake Classification - T he D N R designates the lakes that must be included in the SH district. In Apple Valley, the following four lakes are designated: Recreational Development: Alimagnet Lake, Long Lake, Farquar Lake Natural Environment: Keller Lake Keller Lake Added to Apple Valley's List of D N R Protected Lakes : Keller Lake is located almost entirely in Burnsville and is a now on the C ity of Apple Valley's list of protected lakes. When the SH district was first established in the early 1980s, it appears that the homes abutting the lake in Apple Valley were overlooked. T he D N R has agreed that it would be difficult to designate all of the Apple Valley properties as part of the Keller Lake S H district, but required that, at a minimum, the C ity place the properties immediately abutting Keller Lake under the SH zone. Ten single family parcels and a C ity park are proposed to be included in the "SH" designation. Performance Standards - Lot area, lot width and structure setback is based upon the lake classification, the lot's location relative to the lake, and whether or not the lot is served by C ity water and sewer. T he standards for minimum lot area, minimum lot width and setback remain unchanged for the properties within the shoreland areas of the Recreational Development Lakes. New standards will be added for the 10 single family properties and the City park property abutting Keller Lake, a Natural Environment lake. Charts are provided enumerating the requirements. Special New Provisions - Two new provisions are added to S H district. T he first is a provision that allows homes that do not currently meet the structure setback requirement to construct an open air deck without a variance subject to a number of conditions. As an example, a home on a Recreational Development lake that is located 70' from the O HWL (75' minimum required) would be able to construct a deck that encroaches 10.5' into the O WHL. T he allowance is not significant, but provides an option for homeowners who wish to avoid a variance. T he second new provision would be the ability to construct a "water-oriented" structure of up to a maximum of 144 sq. ft., 10' from the O HWL. As the deck allowance above, the maximum height of the structure would be limited to 10', so the allowance is somewhat limited. Subdivision/Platting and PDs (PUDs) - Most of the properties surrounding the C ity's lakes are developed. As a result, new development is likely to take place as a result of redevelopment. When new lots are created through subdivision, and including rezoning to "PD" or planned development, a suitability analysis is required that confirms that the land, in its natural state, is suitable for the proposed use with minimal alteration. When undertaking projects that require redevelopment, developers often seek to increase density and intensity of uses. Density allowance is calculated with a formula using "density analysis tiers." A request to rezone to PD may allow for increased density, but requires the development to provide additional treatments or development standards to help protect the shoreland areas. Some of the additional requirements include consolidating shore recreational facilities into one centralized area, clustering residential buildings to provide a minimum of 50% of the development area as open space, maintaining a minimum percent of the shore impact zone (SIZ) in a natural, undisturbed state, and maintaining dedicated open space and protected areas through a homeowner's association. Outreach to Residents in the SH Zone: A neighborhood open house was held October 13, 2021, for the residents abutting Keller Lake who will be added to the SH zone as a result of this ordinance update. Owners of five of the eleven properties attended the meeting to learn more about the new proposed ordinance and how their properties might be impacted. Natural Resources and Planning staff helped to explain that the new zone will likely have little impact, until they are ready to expand or redevelop. Staff explained that the SH zone may impact them if and when they construct home additions or large impervious improvements like patios, swimming pools or sport courts. T he residents who attended said that they supported the C ity's efforts to protect the City's lakes. Natural Resources staff also contacted the lake homeowner's association presidents, informing them of the ordinance amendments and the upcoming public hearing, and provided links to draft ordinances for their review. N atural Resources staff will attend a Long Lake Homeowner's Association meeting the week of the public hearing before the Planning Commission. Requirements for setbacks, lot area, lot width, and lot coverage, will remain the same as the previous SH zone requirements. Homeowners within the SH zones of Alimagnet Lake, Long Lake and Farquar Lake will be familiar with the SH requirements. B UD G E T I M PAC T: N/A AT TAC HM E NT S : Memo Ordinance Ordinance Z oning Map CITY OF MEMO Public Works TO: Kathy Bodmer, Planner FROM: Samantha Berger, Water Resource Specialist DATE: October 28, 2021 SUBJECT: Shoreland Overlay Zoning District Ordinance Updates Regulating land use, development, and redevelopment play an important role in protecting water resources in the City of Apple Valley. State and federal regulations for managing runoff, improving public waters, and protecting wetlands have come a long way since the City was founded in 1969. Updating the City’s Shoreland Overlay Zoning District ordinance will strengthen the City’s regulation associated with near lake development. The update to the existing Shoreland Overlay Zoning ordinance will help the City comply with state shoreland requirements that were modified in 2019, and will complement the existing requirements, plans, and programs the City has in place to protect and enhance water quality. Existing requirements and policies the City completes include: • Municipal Separate Storm Sewer (MS4) Program, which requires the City to: o Manage stormwater generated from new development o Enforce sediment and erosion control protections during construction projects o Implement best management practices (BMPs) to improve impaired water bodies o Practice BMPs in City operations, such as maintaining infrastructure, street sweeping, and reducing salt use o Educating the public on stormwater runoff • Implementing the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) of 1991, which regulates impacts to wetlands and ensures the state has a no net loss of wetlands. • Requiring Protective Buffer Zones adjacent to stormwater ponds, wetlands, and lakes during development, redevelopment, or platting activities • Implementing maximum Impervious Surface Coverage Percentages for residential areas, including single and twin homes • Utilizing the City’s 2018 Surface Water Management Plan as a framework to implement BMPs, programs, and policies related to surface water • Participating in Local Watershed Management Organization planning efforts Existing lake management plans and programs the City has in place include: • Lake Specific Assessments (known as Subwatershed Assessments) that identify water quality improvements projects to help improve water quality. These assessments help leverage grant dollars to complete water quality improvement projects. Recent projects include: o Water quality projects associated with the 2019-202 Johnny Cake Ridge Road reconstruction o Pond enhancements at Redwood Park and Erickson Park Ponds o Water Quality Projects at Sunset Park, Moeller Park, and Long Lake Park o Raingardens at Hayes Community Center • Regular Fish Survey and Stocking to help protect water quality and fisheries • Annual Aquatic Plant Surveys to help manage aquatic invasive species that affect water quality • Winter Lake Aeration to prevent winter fish kill and protect stocked fish • Rainwater Rewards Grant program that provides landowners with 50% up to $500 to install raingardens, native gardens, and shoreline projects • Water Quality Monitoring by staff to manage project effectiveness and by citizens as part of the Citizen Assisted Monitoring Program (CAMP) and the Wetland Health Evaluation Program (WHEP) • Establishing ongoing funding through Capital Improvement Planning (CIP) and Grant Applications for future improvement projects As the City moves towards updating the Shoreland Overlay Zoning District Ordinance this will require homeowners and developers to play a role in protecting water quality when considering future improvements, including*: • Limiting impervious surface coverage to 25% for lots • Requiring setbacks for structures adjacent to water bodies. o Exception for water oriented structures of specific size • Prohibiting intensive vegetative removal or clearcutting in the near shore area • Creating native buffers along water bodies, when required • Stricter requirements for Planned Unit Developments • Protecting bluffs and steep slopes *Refer to the draft shoreland ordinance for specific details on each regulation. As outlined, the City is committed to protecting, preserving and enhancing the natural resources of the community and encourages a resourceful and prudent approach to the development and alteration of land. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY ORDINANCE NO. ___ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA, AMENDING TITLE XV OF THE CITY CODE ENTITLED "LAND USAGE” BY DELETING SECTIONS 155.305 THROUGH 155.318 AND REPLACING THE SAME BY ADDING SECTION 155.300 REGARDING SHORELAND OVERLAY DISTRICT REGULATIONS AND BY AMENDING CERTAIN DEFINITIONS IN SECTIONS 155.003 The City Council of Apple Valley ordains: Section 1. Title XV of the Apple Valley City Code is amended by deleting the definition of “shoreland” in Section 155.003. Section 2. Title XV of the Apple Valley City Code is amended by deleting Sections 155.305 through 155.318 and Appendix H in their entirety. Section 3. Title XV of the Apple Valley City Code is amended by adding Section 155.300 to read as follows: SHORELAND OVERLAY DISTRICT Section 155.300. (A) STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION AND PURPOSE STATEMENT. (1) Statutory Authorization. The shoreland overlay district regulations herein are adopted pursuant to the authorization and regulations contained in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 103F, Minnesota Rules, Parts 6120.2500 - 6120.3900, and in accordance with the planning and zoning enabling legislation in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462. (2) Purpose Statement. Minnesota law has delegated responsibility to the City to regulate the subdivision, use and development of the shorelands of protected, public waters within the City for the preservation of water quality, natural characteristics, environmental values and the general health, safety and welfare of all protected waters. The protected public waters in the City have been given a shoreland management classification by the Minnesota Commissioner of Natural Resources as recreational development lakes, consisting of Alimagnet Lake, Moeller (Long) Lake and Farquar Lake, and natural environment lake consisting of Keller Lake. (3) Designation of Shoreland Overlay District. The shorelands of protected, public waters in the City, as defined and regulated by Minnesota shoreland laws, are hereby designated and zoned as “shoreland overlay district.” The shoreland overlay district is a “zone on zone” district intended for those areas where additional or more stringent regulations are necessary to provide water quality and environmental protection of protected water within the district. The shoreland overlay district exists in addition to the underlying zoning district as designated on the 2 City’s zoning map. In the case of overlapping or conflicting regulations, the more restrictive regulation shall apply. (B) GENERAL PROVISIONS AND DEFINITIONS. (1) Scope of Application. The provisions of this Section apply to the shorelands of the public water bodies as defined and classified herein. (2) Definitions. For purposes of the Shoreland Overlay District regulations herein, the definitions of terms set forth in Chapter 153 (subdivision regulations) and Section 155.003 of this Chapter 155 (zoning regulations) shall apply to this Section, except for those terms otherwise specifically defined as follows: Bluff. A topographic feature of land surface with gradual rising steep slope(s) having the following characteristics: 1. The slope must drain toward the waterbody. 2. The slope rises at least 25 feet above the ordinary high water level; 3. The grade of the slope from the toe of the bluff to a point 25 feet or more above the ordinary high water level averages 30 percent or greater (see Figure 1), except that an area with an average slope of less than 18 percent over a distance of at least 50 feet shall not be considered part of the bluff (see Figure 2). Figure 1. Illustration of Bluff 3 Figure 2. Exception to Bluff Bluff impact zone. A bluff and land located within 20 feet of the top of a bluff. Bluff, Toe of. The lower point of a 50-foot segment with an average slope exceeding 18 percent or the ordinary high water level, whichever is higher. See Figure 1. Illustration of Bluff. Bluff, Top of. The higher point of a 50-foot segment with an average slope exceeding 18 percent. See Figure 1. Illustration of Bluff. Boathouses and boat storage structures. A structure that is moored by attaching it by cable, chain, or rope to the shore or to an anchor and that has walls, a roof, and either an open well for boats or a floor from wall to wall for lifted watercraft for the purpose of storing a boat or boating equipment. Building line. A line parallel to a lot line or the ordinary high water level at the required setback beyond which a structure may not extend. Controlled access lot. A lot used to access public waters or as a recreation area for owners of nonriparian lots within the same subdivision containing the controlled access lot. Commissioner. The commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources. Deck. A horizontal, unenclosed platform with or without attached railings, seats, trellises, or other features, attached or functionally related to a principal use or site and at any point extending more than three feet above ground. Height of building. The vertical distance between the highest adjoining ground level at the building or ten feet above the lowest adjoining ground level, whichever is lower, and the highest point of a flat roof or average height of the highest gable of a pitched or hipped roof. Intensive vegetation clearing. The cutting or removal of non-invasive vegetation, including trees, shrubs, and periennel groundcover, in any proportion that adversely affects the overall vegetative cover of the subject area. 4 Lot width. The minimum distance between: 1. Side lot lines measured at the midpoint of the building line; and 2. Side lot lines at the ordinary high water level, if applicable (see Figure 4). Figure 4. Lot Width Ordinary high water level. The boundary of public waters and wetlands, and shall be an elevation delineating the highest water level which has been maintained for a sufficient period of time to leave evidence upon the landscape, commonly that point where the natural vegetation changes from predominantly aquatic to predominantly terrestrial. For watercourses, the ordinary high water level is the elevation of the top of the bank of the channel. For reservoirs and flowages, the ordinary high water level is the operating elevation of the normal summer pool. Public waters. Any water as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 103G.005, Subd. 15, 15a. Sanitary Sewer system. The City’s municipal sanitary sewer system, including all pipelines or conduits, pumping stations, and force main, and all other construction, devices, appliances, or appurtenances and private service lines connected thereto that conducts wastes to a point of ultimate disposal. Shore impact zone. Land located between the ordinary high water level of a public water and a line parallel to it at a setback of 50 percent of the structure setback (see Figure 5). 5 Figure 5. Shore Impact Zone Shoreland or Shoreland District. Land located within 1,000 feet from the ordinary high water level of a waterbody, e.g. a lake, pond, or flowage, that is classified as a protected public waters in Clause D of this Section, except for purposes of Keller Lake only, the boundaries of the shoreland overlay district and the regulations herein apply only to those properties which abut the shore/ordinary high water level of (frontage on) Keller Lake. Notwithstanding the defined 1000 feet delination for a shoreland district herein, the boundary limits of a shoreland district may be less than 1000 feet where natural drainage divides are at lesser distance, as delineated and shown on the City’s official zoning map. Shore recreation facilities. Swimming areas, docks, watercraft mooring areas and launching ramps and other water recreation facilities. Significant historic site. Any archaeological site, standing structure, or other property that meets the criteria for eligibility to the National Register of Historic Places or is listed in the State Register of Historic Sites, or is determined to be an unplatted cemetery that falls under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 307.08. A historic site meets these criteria if it is presently listed on either register or if it is determined to meet the qualifications for listing after review by the Minnesota state archaeologist or the director of the Minnesota Historical Society. All unplatted cemeteries are automatically considered to be significant historic sites. Steep slope. Lands having average slopes greater than 12 percent, as measured over horizontal distances of 50 feet or more, which are not bluffs. Subsurface sewage treatment systems (SSTS). An individual sewage treatment system as defined and regulated in Chapter 51 of this Code. Suitability analysis. An in-depth evaluation of a subject property, consisting of a review of the natural and artificial features of the land, to determine if a proposed use is appropriate for the subject property. 6 Water-oriented accessory structure or facility. A small, above ground building or other improvement, except stairways, fences, docks, and retaining walls, which, because of the relationship of its use to surface water, reasonably needs to be located closer to public waters than the normal structure setback. Examples of such structures and facilities include, watercraft and watercraft equipment storage structures, gazebos, screen houses, fish houses, pump houses, saunas, patios, and detached decks. Boathouses and boat storage structures given the meaning under Minnesota Statutes, Section 103G.245 are not a water-oriented accessory structures. Wetland. “Wetland” has the meaning given under Chapter 152 of this Code. (C) ADMINISTRATION. (1) Permits. In addition to any specific approvals required under this Section, the Minnesota State Building Code shall apply and complied with for the construction of buildings, building additions, structures and other construction, electrical, plumbing and mechanical work subject to the Minnesota State Building Code, Minnesota Rules and regulations for the installation, repair, replacement or alteration of a subsurface sewage treatment system (SSTS) shall apply and be complied with, and for any grading and filling activities the regulations in Chapter 152 and elsewhere in the Code shall apply. Applications for permits under the foregoing regulations shall be be governed by the regulations thereof elsewhere in this Code. (2) Pemit Approval Conditioned on Compliance with Shoreland regulations. No permit as noted in clause (1) above or otherwise may be issued if the proposed use or activity does not comply with the provisions of this Section. (3) Conditional Uses. In addition to the requirements for conditional uses set forth elsewhere in this Chapter, all conditional uses in the shoreland district are subject to an evaluation of the waterbody and the topographic, vegetation, and soil conditions of property on which the use is proposed to ensure: (a) The prevention of soil erosion or other possible pollution of the public water, both during and after construction; (b) The visibility of structures and other facilities as viewed from public waters is limited; and (c) The property is presently, or will be with the completion of the project, served by municipal water and sanitary sewer; and (4) Mitigation. In evaluating all variances, conditional uses, zoning and building permit applications, the zoning authority shall require the property owner to address, when appropriate, the following conditions, when related to and proportional to the impact, to meet the purpose of this ordinance, to protect adjacent properties, and the public interest: (a) Advanced storm water runoff management treatment; (b) Reducing impervious surfaces; 7 (c) Increasing setbacks from the ordinary high water level; (d) Restoration of wetlands; (e) Limiting vegetation removal and/or riparian vegetation restoration; (f) Provisions for the location, design, and use of structures, sewage treatment systems, water supply systems, watercraft launching and docking areas, and parking areas; and (g) Other conditions the zoning authority deems necessary. (5) In evaluating plans to construct a SSTS, roads, driveways, structures, or other mprovements on steep slopes, conditions may be attached to permit approval to prevent erosion and to preserve existing vegetation for screening of structures, vehicles, and other facilities as viewed from the surface of public waters assuming summer, leaf-on vegetation. (6) Notifications to the Department of Natural Resources. (a) In accordance with state law and regulations, the City will submit all proposed amendments to this Section (shoreland overlay regulations) and all notices of public hearings for applications for variances, ordinance amendments, conditional uses under this Section and for any proposed subdivisions/plats, including copy of the proposedsubdivision/plat, of land within the shoreland overlay district to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) for its review and approval for compliance with the Minnesota Shoreland Management Rules. (b) The notices of public hearings will be sent to the DNR commissioner or the commissioner’s designated representative at least ten (10) days before the date of the hearing. The City’s approval of an ordinance amendments, subdivision/plat, variance, and conditional use under this Section will be sent to the DNR commissioner or the commissioner’s designated representative, within ten days of city’s date of final action. (c) Any request to change the shoreland management classification or to reduce the boundaries of public waters will be sent to the DNR commissioner or the commissioner’s designated representative for approval in accordance with Minnesota Rules, part 6120.3000, subp.4 , or as amended hereafter. (7) Mandatory EAW. An Environmental Assessment Worksheet consistent with Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4410 must be prepared for projects meeting the thresholds of Minnesota Rules, part 4410.4300, Subparts 19a, 20a, 25, 27, 28, 29, and 36a. (D) SHORELAND DISTRICT AND LAND USES. (1) Shoreland Districts. The following waterbodies located within the City are classified as protected public waters by the Minnesota DNR pursuant to Minnesota Rules as follows and as shown on the Apple Valley Official Zoning Map and subject to classification as a shoreland overlay district: 8 Natural Environment Lake DNR Public Waters I.D. # Keller* 19002500 * For purposes of Keller Lake only, the boundaries of the shoreland overlay district and the regulations herein apply only to those properties which abut the shore/ordinary high water level of (frontage on) Keller Lake. (2) Land Uses. Within any shoreland overlay district, no structure or land shall be used, except for the following uses or uses deemed similar by the City Council: (a) Permitted uses. Except for those uses declared as a conditional use in this Section, those principal and accessory uses that are allowed as a permitted and permitted accessory use in the underlying zoning district, subject to all regulations thereof as provided in this Chapter or this Section as may apply. (b) Conditional uses. The conditional uses that are allowed as a conditional use in the underlying zoning district, subject to a conditional use permit and all regulations thereof as provided in this Chapter or this Section as may apply. (E) SPECIAL LAND USE PROVISIONS. (1) Commercial and Industrial Uses Prohibited. Commercial or industrial uses are prohibited within a shoreland overlay district. This provision does not apply to lawful home occupations as regulated in this Chapter. (2) Sand and Gravel operations. Sand and gravel operations, as defined elsewhere in this Chapter, are prohibited on any property within a shoreland overlay district. (F) GENERAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS. The following requirements shall be met within a shoreland overlay district: (1) Lot Area and Width Standards. All lots newly created on or after the effective date of this oridnance shall meet the following minimum lot area and lot width requirements: (a) Only that area of the lot that is above the ordinary high water level can be used to meet lot area and width standards; Recreational Development Lake DNR Public Waters I.D. # Alimagnet 19002100 Farquar 19002300 Long 19002200 9 (b) Lot width standards must be met at both the ordinary high water level and at the building line; (c) The area dimensions for “sewer lot” can only be used if publicly owned sewer system service is available and connected to the property; and (d) Minimum lot area and lot width requirements: 1. Property on recreational development lake – No municipal sewer 2. Property on recreational development lake – Municipal sewer: Lot Type Riparian Lot Area (sf) Riparian Lot Width (ft) Nonriparian Lot Area (sf) Nonriparian Lot Width (ft) One-family detached dwelling unit 40,000 150 40,000 150 Two-family attached dwelling units 80,000 225 80,000 265 Three-family attached dwelling units 120,000 300 120,000 375 Four-family attached dwelling units 160,000 375 160,000 490 10 Lot Type Riparian Lot Area (sf) Riparian Lot Width (ft) Nonriparian Lot Area (sf) Nonriparian Lot Width (ft) One-family detached dwelling 20,000 75 15,000 75 Two-family attached dwelling units 35,000 135 26,000 135 Three-family attached dwelling units 50,000 195 38,000 190 Four-family attached dwelling units 65,000 255 49,000 245 11 3. Property on natural environment lake – No municipal sewer 4. Property on natural environment lake – Municipal sewer For purposes of this clause (d) and for two, three, or four-family attached dwelling units, “lot area” and “lot width” is the total or aggregate area or width of all the lots comprising the specific attached dwelling units structure. For illustration, if the two-family attached dwelling units occupy two individual separate lots of record, then both lots are included in calculating lot area and lot width. (2) Special Residential Lot Provisions. (a) A property which abuts a natural environment lakes and is subdivided or redeveloped for attached dwelling units consisting of two, three or four units per building shall be a conditional use and must meet the following standards: 1. Each building must be set back at least 200 feet from the ordinary high water level; Lot Type Riparian Lot Area (sf) Riparian Lot Width (ft) Nonriparian Lot Area (sf) Nonriparian Lot Width (ft) One-family detached dwelling 80,000 200 80,000 200 Two-family attached dwelling units 120,000 300 160,000 400 Three-family attached dwelling units 160,000 400 240,000 600 Four-family attached dwelling units 200,000 500 320,000 800 Lot Type Riparian Lot Area (sf) Riparian Lot Width (ft) Nonriparian Lot Area (sf) Nonriparian Lot Width (ft) One-family detached dwelling 40,000 125 20,000 125 Two-family attached dwelling units 70,000 225 35,000 220 Three-family attached dwelling units 100,000 325 52,000 315 Four-family attached dwelling units 130,000 425 65,000 410 12 2. Each unit must be connected to the City’s municipal water and sanitary sewer system; 3. Watercraft docking facilities for each lot must be centralized in one location and serve all dwelling units on the lot; and 4. The property’s lake frontage/shoreline is no more than 25% of the lake’s total shoreline. (b) Controlled access lots are permissible if created as part of a new subdivision and in compliance with the following standards: 1. The lot must meet the area and width requirements for residential lots under this Section and must be suitable for the intended uses and requirements of controlled access lots as provided in provision 4. set forth below; 2. If docking, mooring, or over-water storage of more than six (6) watercraft is to be allowed for a controlled access lot, then the width of the lot (keeping the same lot depth) must be increased by a percentage of the requirements for riparian residential lots for each watercraft beyond six, as follows: Ratio of lake size to shore length (acres/mile) Required percent increase in frontage Less than 100 25% 100 – 200 20% 201 – 300 15% 301 – 400 10% Greater than 400 5% 3. The lot must be jointly owned by all owners of the residential lots within the subdivision or by all owners of nonriparian lots in the subdivision if exclusively provided riparian access rights on the access lot; and 4. A covenant or other equivalent legal instrument must be recorded against the controlled access lot that provides: a. Specify which lot owners have authority to use the access lot; b. Identify what uses are allowed, which shall be limited to: watercraft launching, loading, storage, beaching, mooring, docking, swimming, sunbathing, or picnicking; c. Limit the total number of vehicles allowed to be parked and the total number of watercraft allowed to be continuously moored, docked, or stored over water on the lot; 13 d. Require centralization of all common facilities and uses in the most suitable locations on the lot to minimize topographic and vegetation alterations; and e. Require all parking areas, storage buildings, and other facilities to be screened by vegetation or topography as much as practical from view from the public water, assuming summer, leaf-on conditions. (3) Access Easements. Easements providing access to boat docking and mooring facilities to non-riparian property owners are prohibited, except as provided herein. (4) Placement, Height, and Design of Structures. When more than one setback applies to a site, structures, impervious surfaces, and SSTSs must meet the setback from the Ordinary High Water Level (OHWL) as set forth in the table below, and comply with the setback provisions in this Paragraph (4). The setback for structures are as follows dependent on whether the property has sanitary sewer facilities and if so, whether the facilities are municipal or SSTS: Waterbody Classification Setback (ft) No Sewer Setback (ft) Municipal Sewer Setback (ft) SSTS Natural Environment Lakes 150 150 150 Recreational Development Lakes 100 75 75 (a) Water-oriented accessory structure or facility. Notwithstanding the foregoing setback requirements, the setback of any water-oriented accesswory structure or facility is no less than 10 feet from the ordinary high water level. (b) Setbacks of decks. Open-aired deck additions attached to the primary residence structure may be allowed without a variance to a residence structure not meeting the required setback from the ordinary high water level if all of the following criteria are met: 1. The residence structure existed on the date the structure setbacks were established; 2. An evaluation of the property and residence structure reveals no reasonable location for the deck meeting or exceeding the existing ordinary high water level setback of the residence structure; 3. The deck encroachment toward the ordinary high water level does not exceed 15 percent of the existing setback of the residence structure from the ordinary high water level or is no closer than 30 feet from the OHWL, whichever is more restrictive (see Figure 8); and 14 4. The deck is constructed in a raised platform design, with open floor slats underwhich is pervious surface and the deck is not roofed or screened. Figure 8. Deck Encroachment If a variance is required, all conditions to be considered for a variance under this Section and this Chapter relative to all zoning variances shall be met and a practical hardship shall be established. (c) Additional structure setbacks. Structures must also meet the following setbacks, regardless of the waterbody classification: Setback from: Setback (ft) Top of bluff 30 Unplatted cemetery 50 Public Right-of-way line (federal, state, or county) 50 City public Right-of-way line 20 (d) Bluff Impact Zones. Primary structures, impervious surfaces, and accessory structure, except stairways and landings, must not be placed within bluff impact zones. (e) Height of Structures. All structures in the underlying zoning district for residential use, except churches and nonresidential agricultural structures, must not exceed 25 feet in height. (f) Lowest Floor Elevation. 1. All structures must be placed at an elevation consistent with the floodplain regulations in this Chapter, if applicable. Structures not located with a floodplain overlay district must be constructed so the elevation to which the lowest floor, including basement, is placed or flood-proofed at a level at least three feet above the highest known water level, or three feet above the ordinary high water level, whichever is higher of the public water. 2. All service utilities must be elevated or water-tight to the elevation three feet above the highest known water level, or three feet above the ordinary high water level, whichever is higher of the public water. 15 3. If elevation methods involving fill would result in filling in the shoreland impact zone, then structures must instead be elevated through floodproofing methods in accordance with 4. below. 4. If the structure is required to be floodproofed, then it must be built to resist hydrostatic pressure through elevation methods such as blocks, pilings, filled stem walls, elevated concrete pad, internally flooded enclosed areas, or through other accepted engineering practices consistent with FEMA Technical Bulletins 1, 2 and 3. (g) Significant Historic Sites. No structure may be placed on a significant historic site in a manner that affects the values of the site unless adequate information about the site has been removed and documented in a public repository. (5) Water Supply and Sewage Treatment. Any public or private supply of water for domestic purposes must meet or exceed standards for water quality of the Minnesota Department of Health and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Any premises used for human occupancy must be connected to the City’s sanitary sewer system, where available, or comply with Minnesota Rules, Chapters 7080 – 7081. (G) PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR VEHICLE INFRASTRUCTURE AND WATER ACCESS FACILITIES/STRUCTURES. (1) Placement and Design of Roads, Driveways, and Parking Areas. Public and private roads and parking areas must be designed to take advantage of natural vegetation and topography to achieve maximum screening as viewed from public waters and comply with the following standards: (a) Roads, driveways, and parking areas must meet structure setbacks and must not be placed within bluff and shore impact zones, when other reasonable and feasible placement alternatives exist. If no alternatives exist, they may be placed within these areas, and must be designed to minimize adverse impacts; (b) Watercraft access ramps, approach roads, and access-related parking areas may be placed within shore impact zones provided the vegetative screening and erosion control conditions of this subpart are met; (c) Private facilities must comply with the grading and filling provisions of Clause H(2) of this Section; and (d) For public roads, driveways and parking areas, plans and related documentation must be designed by a professional engineer registered in the State of Minnesota and the public roads, driveways and parking areas shall be constructed to minimize and control erosion, sediment and stormwater runoff into public waters. (2) Stairways, Lifts, and Landings. Stairways and lifts are the preferred alternative to major topographic alterations for achieving access up and down bluffs and steep slopes to shore areas. Stairways, lifts, and landings must meet the following design requirements: 16 (a) Stairways and lifts must not exceed four feet in width on residential lots. Wider stairways may be used for public recreational uses, and with planned unit developments; (b) Landings for stairways and lifts on residential lots must not exceed 32 square feet in area. Landings larger than 32 square feet may be used for public-space recreational uses and with planned unit developments; (c) Canopies or roofs are not allowed on stairways, lifts, or landings; (d) Stairways, lifts, and landings may be either constructed above the ground on posts or pilings, or placed into the ground, provided they are designed and built in a manner that ensures control of soil erosion; and (e) Facilities such as ramps, lifts, or mobility paths for physically disabled persons are allowed for achieving access to shore areas, if they are consistent with the dimensional and performance standards of sub-clauses (a) through (d) above and the requirements of Minnesota Rules, Chapter 1341. (3) Water-oriented Accessory Structures or Facilities. Each residential lot may have one water-oriented accessory structure or facility if it complies with the following provisions: (a) The structure or facility must not exceed ten feet in height, exclusive of safety rails, and cannot occupy an area greater than 144 square feet. The structure or facility may include detached decks not exceeding eight feet above grade at any point or at-grade patios; (b) The structure or facility is not in the Bluff Impact Zone; (c) The setback of the structure or facility from the ordinary high water level must be at least ten feet; (d) The structure is not a boathouse or boat storage structure as defined under Minnesota Statutes, Section 103G.245; (e) The structure or facility must be treated to reduce visibility as viewed from public waters and adjacent shorelands by vegetation, topography, increased setbacks or color, assuming summer, leaf-on conditions; (f) The roof may be used as an open-air deck with safety rails, but must not be enclosed with a roof or sidewalls or used as a storage area; (g) The structure or facility must not be designed or used for human habitation and must not contain water supply or sewage treatment facilities; 17 (h) Water-oriented accessory structures may have the lowest floor placed lower than the elevation required under Clause (F)(4)(f) if the structure is designed to accommodate internal flooding, constructed of flood-resistant materials to the elevation, electrical and mechanical equipment is placed above the elevation and, if long duration flooding is anticipated, the structure is built to withstand ice action and wind-driven waves and debris. (H) VEGETATION AND LAND ALTERATIONS. (1) Vegetation Management. Removal or alteration of vegetation must comply with the provisions of this subsection except for: (1) Vegetation alteration necessary for the construction of structures and sewage treatment systems under validly issued permits for these facilities; (2). The construction of public roads and parking areas if consistent with Section G(1) of this ordinance; Intensive vegetation clearing in the shore impact zone, bluff impact zone and on steep slopes is prohibited. Vegetation management along the shoreline shall comply with the protective buffer zone requirements set forth in the Natural Resources Management regulations in this Code (Chapter 152). Limited clearing and pruning of trees and shrubs in the shore impact zone, bluff impact zone and on steep slopes is allowed to provide a view to the water from the principal dwelling and to provide for installation of stairways and landings, picnic areas, access paths, permissible beach and watercraft access areas, and municipal and other public utility infrastructure or permitted water- oriented accessory structures or facilities, provided that: (a) The screening of structures, vehicles, or other facilities as viewed from the water, assuming summer, leaf-on conditions, is not substantially reduced; (b) Cut vegetation debris or slash shall be scattered and not mounded on the ground; (c) Perennial ground cover is restored and retained where possible; and (d) Picnic areas, access paths, beaches and watercraft access areas are prohibited in bluff impact zones. (e) Fertilizer and pesticide runoff into surface waters must be minimized through use of vegetation, topography or both. (2) Grading and Filling. (a) Grading and filling activities must comply with the Natural Resources Management regulations set forth in this Code (Chapter 152) and the wetland protection standards under Minnesota Rules, Chapter 8420 and any other permits, reviews, or approvals by other local, state, or federal agencies, such as watershed districts, the DNR or US Army Corps of Engineers. 18 (b) Land disturbance and alterations must be designed and implemented to minimize the amount of erosion and sediment from entering surface waters during and after construction and subject to the following: 1. No fill or excavated material shall be stock piled or placed on the land in a manner that creates unstable slopes. Plans to place fill or excavated material on steep slopes must be designed by qualified professional and followed for continued slope stability and must not create finished slopes of 30 percent or greater; 2. No fill or excavated material shall be placed or stockpiled in bluff impact zones; 3. Any land disturbance or alterations below the ordinary high water level of the public water must first be authorized by Minnesota DNR commissioner under Minnesota Statutes, Section 103G; 4. Placement of natural rock riprap, including associated grading of the shoreline and placement of a filter blanket, shall be governed by the Minnesota DNR Rules for permissibility and installation. (3) Connections to public waters. Excavations to connect boat slips, canals, lagoons, and harbors to public waters require a public waters permit and must comply with Minnesota Rules, Chapter 6115. (4) Stormwater Management. In addition to the stormwater management regulations set forth in Chapter 152 of this Code, the following shall be met: (a) When possible, existing natural drainageways, and vegetated soil surfaces must be used to convey, store, filter, and retain stormwater runoff before discharge to public waters. (b) Development must be planned and conducted in a manner that will minimize the extent of disturbed areas, runoff velocities, erosion potential, and reduce and delay runoff volumes. Disturbed areas must be stabilized as soon as possible and appropriate facilities or methods used to retain sediment on the site. (c) New constructed stormwater outfalls to public waters must be consistent with Minnesota Rules, Rule 6115. (d) Impervious surfaces of lots must not exceed 25 percent of the lot area. (I) SUBDIVISION/PLATTING REQUIREMENTS. (1) Land suitability. Each lot created through subdivision, including a planned unit development authorized herein, must be suitable in its natural state for the proposed use with 19 minimal alteration. The applicant shall have a suitability analysis completed and submit a written report to address whether the proposed subdivision and use(s) are suitable for the property in its natural state with minimal alteration and whether any feature of the land use is likely to be harmful to the public water body or the health, safety, or welfare of future residents of the proposed subdivision or of the community. The suitability analysis shall consider factors relevant to the proposed use and the following features as applicable: susceptibility to flooding; existence of wetlands; soils, erosion potential; slope steepness; water supply, sewage treatment capabilities; water depth, depth to groundwater and bedrock, vegetation, near-shore aquatic conditions unsuitable for water-based recreation; fish and wildlife habitat; presence of significant historic sites; or any other relevant feature of the natural land. The suitability analysis by the applicant shall be completed by a licensed professional engineer or an equivalent professional approved by the City. (2) Consistency with other controls. Subdivisions and each lot in a subdivision shall meet all regulations in this Section and in this Code as applicable. (3) Application Information requirements. All applications for subdivision of land within a shoreland overlay district shall submit the following information relative to the subject property: (a) Topographic contours at two-foot intervals or less from United States Geological Survey maps or more current sources, showing limiting site characteristics; (b) All water boundary data shall be shown on the proposed plat as required by Minnesota Statutes, section 505.021, Subd. 1, which shall be obtained from United States Geological Survey quadrangle topographic maps or more current sources; (c) Soils information to determine suitability for any proposed building and structures for every lot from the most current existing sources or from field investigations such as soil borings, percolation tests, or other methods; (d) Location of existing municipal water and sewer utilities; extent of anticipated vegetation and topographic disturbance and alterations; near-shore aquatic conditions, including depths, types of bottom sediments, and aquatic vegetation; and proposed methods for controlling stormwater runoff and erosion, both during and after construction activities; (e) Location of 100-year floodplain and floodway designations from current FEMA maps or data; and (f) A line or contour representing the ordinary high water level, the “toe” and the “top” of bluffs, and the minimum building setback distances from the top of the bluff and the lake or stream. (4) Dedications. Subdivision approval shall be subject to land dedication or an easement for storm water drainage and holding areas or ponds over existing natural drainage or ponding areas for management of stormwater and significant wetlands. 20 (J) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS (PUD). (1) PUDs Permissible. Planned unit developments (PUDs) for residential uses may be permitted for new developments on undeveloped land, redevelopment of previously built sites, or conversions of existing buildings and land. Deviation from the minimum lot size requirements set forth in this Section may be permitted for a PUD if all provisions of this Clause (J) are met. (2) Regulation of PUDs. Planned unit developments in the shoreland district shall be deemed a conditional use subject to the terms and conditions of a Planned Development Agreement and Planned Development Ordinance approved by the City and shall comply with the provisions of this Clause (J) and those standards outlined elsewhere in the zoning and subdivision regulations in this Code. When there is a conflict in requirements, the more stringent of the requirements shall be applied. Applications will not be considered complete until all applicable environmental reviews are completed and submitted by the applicant. (3) Application for a PUD. The applicant for a PUD must submit all documents and information with the PUD application that is required under the City’s subdivion regulations in this Code and the subdivision provisions in this Section. Additionally, the applicant shall provide a detailed written statement setting forth how the proposed PUD benefits the City. The applicant shall provide a property owner’s association agreement with mandatory membersip, and consistent with part 7 of this section. (4) Land use restrictions. Approval of a PUD under this Section will be subject to a condition requiring either deed restrictions, covenants, private permanent easements or other legal instruments that: (a) Restrict or otherwise regulate future vegetative and topographic alterations, construction of additional buildings, and beaching of watercraft; and (b) Preserve and restrict alteration to the open space area established and regulated elsewhaere under this Clause (J) (5) Density Determination. A new or expansion of an existing PUD must meet the density restrictions in accordance with the following: (a) Step 1. Identify Density Analysis Tiers. Divide the project parcel into tiers by drawing one or more lines parallel to the ordinary high water level at the following intervals, proceeding landward: Waterbody Classification No Sewer (ft) Sewer (ft) Recreational Development Lakes 267 267 Natural Environment Lakes 400 320 21 (b) Step 2. Calculate Suitable Area for Development. Calculate the suitable area within each tier by excluding all wetlands, bluffs, or land below the ordinary high water level of public waters. (c) Step 3. Determine Base Density: For residential PUDs, divide the suitable area within each tier by the minimum single residential lot area for lakes to determine the allowable number of dwelling units, or base density, for each tier. Allowable densities may be transferred from any tier to any other tier further from the waterbody, but must not be transferred to any tier closer to the waterbody. All PUDs with densities at or below the base density must meet the design standards set forth in this Paragraph J(7) herein. (6) Increased Density (a) An increase to the dwelling unit or dwelling site base densit y determined in Clause 5 above may be allowed as set forth in the following table if the design criteria in Clause (7) below are met, as well as the setback standards in (b) below: Shoreland Tier Maximum density increase within each tier (percent) 1st 50 2nd 100 3rd 200 4th 200 5th 200 (b) Structure setbacks from the ordinary high water level: 1. Are increased to at least 50 percent greater than the minimum setback; or 2. The impact on the waterbody is reduced an equivalent amount through vegetative management, topography, or additional acceptable means and the setback is at least 25 percent greater than the minimum setback. (7) Design Criteria. All PUDs must meet the following design criteria: (a) General Design Standards. 1. All residential planned unit developments must contain at least five dwelling units or sites. 2. On-site water supply and sewage treatment systems must be centralized and meet the standards in Clause (F)(5) of this Section. No private sewage treatment systems/SSTS are permitted. 22 3. Dwelling units or dwelling sites must be clustered into one or more groups and located on suitable areas of the development. 4. Dwelling units or dwelling sites must be designed and located to meet the dimensional standards in Clause (F)(4) herein. 5. Shore recreation facilities: a. Must be centralized and located in areas suitable for them based on a suitability analysis. b. The number of spaces provided for continuous beaching, mooring, or docking of watercraft must not exceed one for each allowable dwelling unit or site in the first tier (notwithstanding existing mooring sites in an existing commercially used harbor). c. Launching ramp facilities, including a small dock for loading and unloading equipment, may be provided for use by occupants of dwelling units or sites located in other tiers. 6. Structures, parking areas, and other facilities must be treated to reduce visibility as viewed from public waters and adjacent shorelands by vegetation, topography, increased setbacks, color, or other means acceptable to the local unit of government, assuming summer, leaf-on conditions. Vegetative and topographic screening must be preserved, if existing, or may be required to be provided. 7. Accessory structures and facilities, except water oriented accessory structures, must meet the required structure setback and must be centralized. 8. Water-oriented accessory structures and facilities may be allowed if they meet or exceed design standards contained in Clause (G)(3) herein and are centralized. (b) Open Space Requirements for a Residential PUD. In accordance with Minnesota Rules-DNR shoreland zoning requirements, the following shall be met: 1. Open space must constitute at least 50 percent of the total project area and must include : a. Areas with physical characteristics unsuitable for development in their natural state; b. Areas containing significant historic sites or unplatted cemeteries; 23 c. Portions of the shore impact zone preserved in its natural or existing state as follows: (i). For existing residential PUD’s, at least 50 percent of the shore impact zone (ii). For new residential PUDs, at least 70 percent of the shore impact zone. (iii). For all commercial PUD’s, at least 50 percent of the shore impact zone. 2. Open space may include: a. Outdoor recreational facilities for use by owners of dwelling units or sites, by guests staying in commercial dwelling units or sites, and by the general public; b. Subsurface sewage treatment systems if the use of the space is restricted to avoid adverse impacts on the systems; and c. Non-public water wetlands. 3. Open space shall not include: a. Dwelling sites or lots, unless owned in common by an owners association; b. Dwelling units or structures, except water-oriented accessory structures or facilities; c. Road rights-of-way or land covered by road surfaces and parking areas; d. Land below the OHWL of public waters; and e. Commercial facilities or uses. (c) Open Space Maintenance and Administration Requirements. 1. Open space preservation. Existing open space areas, including topography, vegetation, and allowable uses, must be preserved and maintained by use of deed restrictions, covenants, private permanent easements, or other equally effective and permanent means. The instrument must prohibit: a. Commercial uses (for residential PUD’s); 24 b. Vegetation and topographic disturbance or alterations other than routine maintenance; c. Construction of additional buildings or storage of vehicles and other materials; and d. Uncontrolled beaching of watercraft. 2. Development organization and functioning. Unless an equally effective alternative community framework is established, all residential planned unit developments must use an owners association for the preservation and maintenance of the required open area with the following features: a. Membership must be mandatory for each dwelling unit or dwelling site owner and any successive owner; b. Each member must pay a pro rata share of the association’s expenses, and unpaid assessments can become liens on units or dwelling sites; c. Assessments must be adjustable to accommodate changing conditions; and d. The association must be responsible for insurance, taxes, and maintenance of all commonly owned property and facilities. (d) Erosion Control and Stormwater Management. Erosion and sediment control plans must be prepared and complied with in accordance with the natural resources management regulation in this Code (Chapter 152). Section 4. Title XV of the Apple Valley City Code is amended by adding or revising the following definitions in Section 155.003 to read as follows: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT or PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT. An urban development often having two or more principal uses and having specialized performance standards relating to an overall approved development plan to provide for an optimal land use relationship. Development of land that is not subject to the designated zoning district or standard zoning requirements for the property, but instead regulated in accordance with standards and criteria reached by agreement between the City and the developer. The uses in a Planned Development may be more than one type of principal uses or a single type of use. In SH, shoreland overlay districts, the term PLANNED DEVELOPMENT also applies does not apply to any commercial, or industrial use in so far as such use is not permitted within a shoreland overlay district. or multiple (attached) residential use. 25 COMMERCIAL. Any use occurring and permitted within a business zone (LB, LB-1, NCC, GB, GB-1, RB, SC and VB) of land or buildings for the sale, lease, rental, or trade of products, goods, and services. STRUCTURE. Any building or appurtenance Tthat which is built or constructed, an edifice or building of any kind, or any piece of work artificially built up or composed of parts joined together in some definite manner, including decks, platforms, retaining walls, but excluding aerial or underground utility lines, such as sewer, electric, telephone, telegraph, gas lines, towers, poles, and other supporting facilities. Section 5. Summary approved. The City Council hereby determines that the text of the summary marked "Official Summary of Ordinance No. _____” a copy of which is attached hereto clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance. The City Council further determines that publication of the title and such summary will clearly inform the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance. Section 6. Filing. A copy of the ordinance shall be filed in the office of the City Clerk. This copy shall be available for inspection by any persons during regular office hours. Section 7. Publication. The City Clerk shall publish the title of this ordinance and the official summary in the official newspaper of the City with notice that a printed copy of the ordinance is available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the Office of the City Clerk. Section 8. Effective date. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and the publication of its title and the official summary. PASSED by the City Council this ____ day of ________, 2021. Clint Hooppaw, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk 26 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY ORDINANCE NO. _____ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA, AMENDING TITLE XV OF THE CITY CODE ENTITLED "LAND USAGE” BY DELETING SECTIONS 155.305 THROUGH 155.318 AND REPLACING THE SAME BY ADDING SECTION 155.300 REGARDING SHORELAND OVERLAY DISTRICT REGULATIONS AND BY AMENDING CERTAIN DEFINITIONS IN SECTIONS 155.003 The following is the official summary of Ordinance No. ____ passed by the City Council of Apple Valley on _________________, 2021: Chapter 155 is revised to delete the definition of “shoreland” in Section 155.003 and add the definition in the new Section 155.300 and to delete Sections 155.305 through 155.318 governing Shoreland Overlay District zoning regulations and adding Section 155.300 to replace the Shoreland Overlay District zoning regulations consistent and in accordance with the updated shoreland regulations mandated by Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Rules. Chapter 155 is further amended by revising certain definitions in Section 155.003 applicable to the general zoning regulations. A printed copy of the ordinance is available for inspection by any person during regular office hours in the office of the City Clerk at the Apple Valley Municipal Center, 7100 147th Street W., Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. ___ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP BY REZONING CERTAIN LAND IN THE CITY OF APPLE VALLEY, DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Apple Valley held a public hearing on property described herein on ___________, as required by City Code Section 155.400(D), and WHEREAS, on __________, the Planning Commission recommended the rezoning as hereinafter described. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Apple Valley, Dakota County, Minnesota, that: 1. The boundaries of the zoning districts as set forth on the zoning map established by City Code Section 155.006 are hereby amended by designating the following described properties abutting Keller Lake in the City of Apple Valley as being included within the “SH” (Shoreland Overlay) zone: Lots 13 to 15 and 19 to 25, inclusive, Block 5, Apple Valley 12th Addition, and Outlot A, Apple Valley 12th Addition 2. This ordinance shall become effective upon its passage and publication. Passed this ____th day of ____, 2021. _______________________________ Clint Hooppaw, Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________________ Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk LAKE LONG LAKE LAC LAVON COBBLESTONE FARQUAR LAKE ALIMAGNET LAKE T.H #77CO RD 38 CO RD 38 C O R D 3 8 C O R D 3 8 CEDAR AVED O D D BLVDCEDAR AVE140th ST W 1 4 0th S T W 140th ST W P a lo m in o D rGALAXIE AVEPILOT KNOB RDDI AMOND PATH WGARDEN VIEW DR150th ST (CO RD 42)JOHNNY CAKE RIDGE RD150th ST W (CO RD 42) SH - SHORELAND OVERLAY ZONING MAP AMENDMENT ZONING MAP µ "SH" (Shoreland Overlay) Zone Keller Lake Properties Parcels Abutting Keller Lake P PR-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 WHITNEY DRHOPEWELLLNGARDEN VIEW DRR E D WELLLNREDWOODDR H IG H VIEW DR ROME D R ROME CTPORTERLNBALDWIN DR CORTLANDDR S µ SH - SHORELAND OVERLAY ZONING MAP AMENDMENT ZONING MAP ^ Parcels Abutting Keller Lake P R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 WHITNEY DR B A L D W IN D R PORTERLNBALDWIN D R EXISTING ZONING PROPOSED ZONING Keller SH Zone I T E M: 4.B. P L A NNI NG C O MMI S S I O N ME E T I NG D AT E:November 3, 2021 S E C T I O N:P ublic Hearings Description: U-Haul Request to Amend P lanned Development 254, Conditional Use Permit for E xterior S torage, and S ite Plan/B uilding Permit Authorization S taff Contact: A lex Sharpe, Planning and Economic Dev. S pec. Department / Division: Community Development Department Applicant: U-Haul A pple Valley P roject Number: P C21-19-B Applicant Date: 60 Days: 120 Days: AC T I O N RE Q UE S T E D: Open the public hearing for the Planned Development amendment and C onditional Use Permit amendment requests, receive comments and close the public hearing. It is the policy of the Planning C ommission not to act on a public hearing item the night of the public hearing. S UM M ARY: U-Haul has applied for a sketch plan review to add a 12,230 sq. ft. building addition at their current site located at 6895 151st St. W. T he 3.08 acre site is located in the southeast corner of Galaxie and 150th/C SA H 42. U-Haul currently operates a self-storage, vehicle/equipment rental, and exterior storage area for customer vehicles on the site. T he applicant previously brought this project before the Planning C ommission as a sketch plan in J une 2021. Previously the application proposed removing all of the exterior customer storage of vehicles, however in the current application the building has been reduced from the sketch plan's 17,000 sq. ft. structure to 12,230 sq. ft. T his allows for the existing customer storage of vehicles to be retained in a smaller format. T he removal of the exterior storage area was noted as a benefit as part of the sketch plan and was a support for addition of a new use on the site. T he U-Box product is similar to a PO D product already in the market. T he product is dropped off at a customer location where they fill the box with items they seek to store. T he U-Box is then picked up by U-Haul and stored in their building. To access their items, the customer must request that the U-Box be delivered to a suitable location and may not be accessed on site. T he inability to access the stored customer materials on site is the primary difference between this product and a full self-storage facility. T he applicant narrative attached to this report provides additional details on the product. B AC K G RO UND: Site P lan T he plan proposes to add an additional 12,230 sq. ft. structure to the western side of the lot where exterior storage of customer vehicles is the current use. T he site accesses would remain on 151st and all truck maneuvering will be required to occur on site. An auto-turn drawing was requested by staff and is included in the sketch plan demonstrating that the semis transporting the U-Boxes do not utilize public right-of-way (RO W) for maneuvering. Zoning T he site is zoned P D-254 Zone 1, which allows self-storage facilities and exterior storage by Conditional Use Permit (C UP). A C UP was previously granted for the exterior storage of customer and rental vehicles in 1999. T his application requires amending the existing C UP, or rescinding the old and approving a new one with an updated site plan and conditions. T he 1999 C UP limited the number of rental vehicles permitted on site to 29. Since that time, the number of vehicles stored on site has often exceeded this number, often making the site impassable for fire should the need arise. With the C UP amendment staff is recommending additional conditions on the storage of rental vehicles that would limit the use of the public street. If approved, staff recommends that no rental vehicles be permitted to be parked on the public street at any time as this has been an issue for Police and Fire in the past. Exterior storage is permitted within the C ity by C UP and is generally seen as a benefit when it is removed. As noted previously, the sketch plan anticipated that all of the customer storage of vehicles would be removed as part of this project. T he 1999 C UP allowed for the storage of 15 rental parking spaces for customer recreational vehicles. T he current plans appear to allow for the storage of 4-5 rental parking spaces for recreational vehicles. Aerial photos show that U-Haul has regularly stored more than 20 customer vehicles on site in the past. If approved, staff would recommend conditions be added specifying the total number of vehicles and recreational equipment that are permitted to be stored on site. T he current building coverage is approximately 30%. A PD amendment is requested that would allow for a 40% building coverage, an increase from the current allowed building coverage of 30%. T he primary reason for restricting building coverage is to promote green space for stormwater infiltration. However, the zone does not include an impervious surface maximum. Most of the sites within this zone have approximately 90% of the site covered with impervious surfaces and the proposed building addition would cover area that is currently impervious. Stormwater management is improved with this application due to other requirements in C ity code that require stormwater treatment based on the disturbed area on a site. Stormwater is proposed to be pre-treated in an underground system prior to entering the public stormwater system, an improvement over current conditions. T he front setback is required to be 30', and side setback is 10', both of which are met. PD-254 and the regular zoning code do not allow multiple principal structures on the site. To allow these structures to be considered a single entity a roof structure, connecting the two is required. T he applicant is proposing a 50' wide roof section connecting the two and creating a single structure by code. T his roof is required to be at a height where a fire truck can pass underneath and will require additional fire rating. P arking T he site currently has 58 parking stalls outside of the area designated for vehicle exterior storage. T he new site plan proposed a total of 60 stalls and has the opportunity to add more behind the proposed building. T his area could also be designated for trailer and rental vehicle storage. T he proposed addition would not be open to the public and would not generate additional parking demand for staff as the building is primarily used for storage. C onditions on the site plan and building permit authorization could include that customers are not permitted to access the U-Box storage as this would result in increased traffic and parking requirements that the site may not be able to accommodate. Landscaping T he new building will be subject to landscaping requirements. N ew landscaping will be required at the industrial rate of 1.5% of the means construction cost. T he site has limited space for landscaping and has limited ability to improve public spaces through improved materials. Screening of the proposed building on the east and additional parking to the north will be required. Building Materials and Elev ations T he primary building material is a metal panel system. Staff has requested that the applicant provide a material sample as this material is up to 89% of the total wall area on the west facade. T he zone is intended for a quasi-industrial use, but staff has concerns about the massing of this structure due to its height and size in comparison with the existing building and those in the surrounding area. As noted in the sketch plan review, the building materials should closely match the materials on the existing structure, which includes more brick veneer and accent banding to break up the massing of the building. On review of the original building staff required additional vertical brick elements, horizontal banding and windows to add visual interest and break up building massing. With the additional height of this building staff is suggesting similar elements be added to those areas which can be seen off-site. T he North and South facades include some of these, but could include additional elements. Additionally, the height of the proposed structure would allow the east and west facades to be visible from off-site, which was not the case with the original structure. Building Height T he zone allows for a maximum building height of 35'. T he proposed structure is 47' at its maximum height, which would require additional amendment to the Planned Development in order to be permitted. Industrial uses have trended towards higher clear story buildings in recent years, but this building would be considerably taller than those in the surrounding area. A building of this height with a homogenous facade material may dominate the C S A H 42/ surrounding area viewshed. Amending the P D to allow for additional height could have additional ramifications for the zone. An amendment would affect all properties within PD-254, a total of 6 other parcels. For example, the neighboring self-storage facility could expand vertically if a 45'-50' building height were permitted. As noted, many industrial uses seek and often require the higher, clear story buildings. T he intended "purpose of this zone is to provide for an integrated mix of heavy commercial, light industrial and general office uses." T hese include warehousing, storage, and fabrication, which can all benefit from increased clear story heights. T he proximity of this zone with C SA H 42, and the nearby Kelley Park/multi-family housing may limit the total height sought within this zone. Stormwater, Trip Generation and Utilities T he C ity Engineer memo attached provides greater detail on storm and utility requirements as additional coordination between the C ity and the applicant is required. Stormwater treatment is required due to the amount of disturbance proposed. As noted previously, an underground stormwater system is proposed with the project. T he addition of this system allows for improved stormwater management than exists on site today. Prior to the Planning Commission’s final review the applicant will be required to submit trip generation expectations for the new facility to ensure the site will be able to accommodate any increase to traffic. B UD G E T I M PAC T: N/A AT TAC HM E NT S : L ocation Map Z oning Map Plan S et Elevations Memo Memo 151ST ST W 150TH ST W GALAXIE AVEGABELLA STFORUM PATH150TH ST W GALAXIE AVESITE Proposed Site U-Haul U-Box Addition Zoned PD-254 ^ 151ST ST W 150TH ST W GALAXIE AVEGABELLA STFORUM PATH150TH ST W GALAXIE AVEA PD-254 PD-254SITE Proposed Site U-Haul U-Box Addition Zoned PD-254 ^ U-HAUL U-BOX LIC. NO.DATE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT DATE: 9/30/2021 1:16 PMRYAN J. ANDERSON XX/XX/21 55938 NOTE: THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN MISINTERPRETATION. 25154 C0A DATA DATE DESCRIPTION BY PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,FILE LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\25000 PROJ\25100-25199\25154 UHAUL-APPLE VALLEY MN\25154 CIVIL-SURVEY\CIVIL PRODUCTION DRAWINGS\25154 C0A DATA.DWG- 21-25154 --/--/-- C0-10 PROJECT LOCATION N S W E LOCATION MAP 0 SCALE IN FEET 500 1000 SITE SUMMARY ZONING:PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 254 SITE/LOT AREA:133,914 SQ. FT / 3.07 AC. IMPERVIOUS AREA:108,832 SQ. FT / 2.50 AC. GREENSPACE PROVIDED:25,082 SQ. FT / 0.57 AC. PARKING REQUIREMENTS (PER CITY CODE) TYPE UNIT / AREA STALLS REQUIRED STALLS PROVIDED RETAIL (2,100 SF)1 / 150 SF 14 37 WAREHOUSE (6,000 SF)1 / 400 SF 15 15 WAREHOUSE (6,196 SF)1 / 800 SF 8 8 TOTAL:37 60 SETBACKS PARKING BUILDING FRONT YARD 20'-0"30'-0" SIDE YARD 5'-0"10'-0" REAR YARD 20'-0"40'-0" PROJECT ADDRESS / LOCATION: 6895 151ST STREET WEST APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA 55124 B.M. ELEVATION=950.86 T.N.F.H. LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY 1.ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, WHICH INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO, THE OWNER - CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT, THE PROJECT MANUAL (WHICH INCLUDES GENERAL SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS), DRAWINGS OF ALL DISCIPLINES AND ALL ADDENDA, MODIFICATIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS ISSUED BY THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER. 2.CONTRACT DOCUMENTS SHALL BE ISSUED TO ALL SUBCONTRACTORS BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IN COMPLETE SETS IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE THE FULL EXTENT AND COMPLETE COORDINATION OF ALL WORK. 3.WRITTEN DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS. NOTIFY ARCHITECT/ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR CONDITIONS REQUIRING INFORMATION OR CLARIFICATION BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. 4.FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. NOTIFY ARCHITECT/ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR CONDITIONS REQUIRING INFORMATION OR CLARIFICATION BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. 5.DETAILS SHOWN ARE INTENDED TO BE INDICATIVE OF THE PROFILES AND TYPE OF DETAILING REQUIRED THROUGHOUT THE WORK. DETAILS NOT SHOWN ARE SIMILAR IN CHARACTER TO DETAILS SHOWN. WHERE SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS, DETAILS OR DESIGN INTENT CANNOT BE DETERMINED, NOTIFY ARCHITECT/ENGINEER BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. 6.ALL MANUFACTURED ARTICLES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE APPLIED, INSTALLED, CONNECTED, ERECTED, CLEANED AND CONDITIONED ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURERS' INSTRUCTIONS. IN CASE OF DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN MANUFACTURERS' INSTRUCTIONS AND THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, NOTIFY ARCHITECT/ENGINEER BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. 7.ALL DISSIMILAR METALS SHALL BE EFFECTIVELY ISOLATED FROM EACH OTHER TO AVOID GALVANIC CORROSION. 8.THE LOCATION AND TYPE OF ALL INPLACE UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE FOR GENERAL INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF THE KNOWLEDGE OF I & S GROUP, INC. (ISG). NO WARRANTY OR GUARANTEE IS IMPLIED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE SIZES, LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF ALL INPLACE UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM PLAN. 9.THE CONTRACTOR IS TO CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, MINIMUM 2 BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION / CONSTRUCTION (1-800-252-1166). PROJECT GENERAL NOTES ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CITY OF APPLE VALLEY REQUIREMENTS AND MnDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION, 2018 EDITION, THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR SANITARY SEWER, STORM DRAIN AND WATERMAIN AS PROPOSED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA 2018, AND CURRENT VERSION OF THE MINNESOTA STATE PLUMBING CODE UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE. HORIZONTAL COORDINATES HAVE BEEN REFERENCED TO THE NORTH AMERICAN DATUM OF 1983 (NAD83), 1996 ADJUSTMENT (NAD83(1996)) ON THE DAKOTA COUNTY COORDINATE SYSTEM, IN U.S. SURVEY FEET. ELEVATIONS HAVE BEEN REFERENCED TO THE NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD 88). RTK GPS METHODS WERE USED TO ESTABLISH HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL COORDINATES FOR THIS PROJECT. THIS PROJECT'S TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY CONSISTS OF DATA COLLECTED IN SEPTEMBER 2021 BY BOHLEN SURVEYING & ASSOCIATES. SPECIFICATIONS REFERENCE PROJECT DATUM TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY AC ACRE ADA AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT ADD ADDENDUM AFF ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR AGG AGGREGATE APPROXAPPROXIMATE ARCH ARCHITECT, ARCHITECTURAL BFE BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION BIT BITUMINOUS CAD COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN CB CATCH BASIN CFS CUBIC FEET PER SECOND CF CUBIC FOOT CI CAST IRON CIP CAST IRON PIPE CIPC CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE CJ CONTROL JOINT CL CENTERLINE CMP CORRUGATED METAL PIPE CO CLEANOUT CONC CONCRETE CONST CONSTRUCTION CONT CONTINUOUS CY CUBIC YARD C&G CURB AND GUTTER DEMO DEMOLITION DIA DIAMETER DIM DIMENSION DS DOWNSPOUT EA EACH ELEC ELECTRICAL ELEV ELEVATION EOF EMERGENCY OVERFLOW EQ EQUAL EX EXISTING FDC FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION FDN FOUNDATION FFE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION FPM FEET PER MINUTE FPS FEET PER SECOND FT FOOT, FEET FTG FOOTING GA GAUGE GAL GALLON GALV GALVANIZED GC GENERAL CONTRACTOR GFE GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION GL GUTTER LINE GPM GALLONS PER MINUTE GV GATE VALVE HDPE HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE HD HEAVY DUTY HH HANDHOLE HORIZ HORIZONTAL HR HOUR HWL HIGH WATER LEVEL HWY HIGHWAY HYD HYDRANT I INVERT ID INSIDE DIAMETER IN INCH INV INVERT IP IRON PIPE IPS IRON PIPE SIZE J-BOX JUNCTION BOX JT JOINT LF LINEAR FEET LIN LINEAR LPS LOW PRESSURE STEAM LS LUMP SUM LSO LOWEST STRUCTURAL OPENING MAX MAXIMUM MB MAIL BOX MECH MECHANICAL MH MANHOLE MIN MINIMUM MISC MISCELLANEOUS NO NUMBER NTS NOT TO SCALE NWL NORMAL WATER LEVEL OC ON CENTER OCEW ON CENTER EACH WAY OH OVERHEAD OHD OVERHEAD DOOR OZ OUNCE PED PEDESTAL, PEDESTRIAN PERF PERFORATED PL PROPERTY LINE PP POLYPROPYLENE PSI POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH PVC POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PVMT PAVEMENT QTY QUANTITY RAD RADIUS RCP REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE RD ROOF DRAIN REBAR REINFORCING BAR REM REMOVE ROW RIGHT OF WAY R/W RIGHT OF WAY SAN SANITARY SCH SCHEDULE SF SQUARE FOOT SPEC SPECIFICATION SQ SQUARE STA STATION SY SQUARE YARD T/C TOP OF CURB TEL TELEPHONE TEMP TEMPORARY THRU THROUGH TNFH TOP NUT OF FIRE HYDRANT TRANS TRANSFORMER TV TELEVISION T/W TOP OF WALL TYP TYPICAL UT UTILITY, UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE VCP VITRIFIED CLAY PIPE W/O WITHOUT W/WITH YD YARD LEGEND EXISTING CITY LIMITS ACCESS CONTROL SECTION LINE QUARTER SECTION LINE RIGHT OF WAY LINE PROPERTY / LOTLINE EASEMENT LINE CULVERT WATER EDGEW WET WETLAND BOUNDARY WETLAND / MARSH WATER FENCE LINEXXXX UT STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER >SANITARY SEWER FORCEMAIN<II CONTOUR (MAJOR) I UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE OVERHEAD ELECTRICOE UNDERGROUND ELECTRICUE UNDERGROUND TVUTV GASG FBO UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC CONTOUR (MINOR) DECIDUOUS TREE CONIFEROUS TREE TREE LINE MANHOLE/STRUCTURE CATCH BASIN HYDRANT CURB STOP VALVE UTILITY PEDESTAL / CABINET POWER POLE 990 989 PROPOSED CULVERT STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER >WATERII OVERHEAD ELECTRICOE UNDERGROUND ELECTRICUE UNDERGROUND TVUTV GASG CONTOUR CATCH BASIN HYDRANT VALVE EASEMENT RIGHT OF WAY>>>>>>>>STORM SEWER (PIPE WIDTH) 1015 LOT LINE SANITARY SEWER (PIPE WIDTH) OVERHEAD UTILITYOHL UNDERGROUND UTILITY UTL CITY OF APPLE VALLEY CIVIL SHEET INDEX C0-10 SITE DATA ---- ---- C0-10 MINNESOTAAPPLE VALLEY SITE DATA LCH LCH RJA CIVIL PLAN ABBREVIATIONS: MANHOLE (STORM, SANITARY) C.S.A.H. NO. 42 (150TH ST W)GALAXIE AVECEDAR AVEFLAGSTAFF AVE157TH ST W C0-10 SITE DATA C0-20 SITE DETAILS C0-21 SITE DETAILS C1-10 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN NARRATIVE C1-20 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN DETAILS C1-30 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C2-10 EXISTING SITE & REMOVALS PLAN C3-10 SITE PLAN C3-20 UTILITY PLAN C4-10 GRADING PLAN C5-10 SITE RESTORATION & PLANTING PLAN C5-20 PLANTING NOTES & DETAILS C6-10 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SUBMITTAL SCHEDULE TYPE DATE SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL #1 10/06/2021 CONCRETE SLAB (MIN 4000 PSI) AGGREGATE BASE 5"6"COMPACTED SUBGRADE CONCRETE PAVEMENT NTS MnDOT CLASS 5 STANDARD CONCRETE SLAB (MIN 4000 PSI) AGGREGATE BASE 6"6"COMPACTED SUBGRADE CONCRETE PAVEMENT NTS MnDOT CLASS 5 HEAVY DUTY 8"12"6"13 12"6" 3 1 R3" R12" R3" HORIZONTAL LINE7"2 NOTES: LONGITUDINAL JOINT WHEN ADJACENT TO RIGID PAVEMENT OR BASE. SLOPE 0.06FT/FT NORMAL, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. IF A DIFFERENT GUTTER SLOPE IS PERMITTED, THE FORM MAY BE TILTED. 1 2 1 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER NTS B612 HORIZONTAL LINE MATCH CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER SECTION SEE PLAN FOR LOCATION SECTION TO MATCH CONCRETE CURB SHOE ROTATED TO DRAIN SEE PLAN FOR LOCATION SLOPE TO DRAIN 2.0% (TYP) REVERSE PITCH CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER NTS BACK OF CURB CONC CURB & GUTTER SEE DETAIL & PLAN FOR TYPE CURB TAPER NTS 3' 25154 C0B DETAILS DATE DESCRIPTION BY PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,FILE LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\25000 PROJ\25100-25199\25154 UHAUL-APPLE VALLEY MN\25154 CIVIL-SURVEY\CIVIL PRODUCTION DRAWINGS\25154 C0B DETAILS.DWG- 21-25154 --/--/-- C0-20 SITE DETAILS C0-20 SITE DETAILS ---- ---- C0-20 MINNESOTAAPPLE VALLEY LCH LCH RJA U-HAUL U-BOX LIC. NO.DATE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT DATE: 9/30/2021 12:48 PMRYAN J. ANDERSON XX/XX/21 55938 NOTE: THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN MISINTERPRETATION. PAY HEIGHT(SEE STORM DRAIN SCHEDULE)SEE STORM DRAIN SCHEDULE RIM ELEVATION STEPS INSTALLED AS SPECIFICED IN MnDOT STANDARD PLATE 4180J BRICK & MORTAR CONCRETE ADJUSTING RINGS 3 MIN, 6 MAX W/ MFRS SEALANT BETWEEN RINGS. PLACE BITUMINOUS MASTIC BETWEEN BOTTOM RING AND TOP OF STRUCTURE & MFRS SEALANT BETWEEN JOINTS SEE STORM SCHEDULE FOR CASTING PRECAST CONCRETE BASE (SEE MnDOT STANDARD PLATE 4011) 3 PROVIDE A FULL MORTAR BED 1' MIN.2 8" 4 NOTES: WHEN USED AS A CATCH BASIN AND REQUIRING A RECTANGULAR OPENING, USE 4022 CONCRETE COVER. WHEN REFERING TO A CURB CATCH BASIN, USE TOP BACK OF CURB ELEVATION. WALL CONSTRUCTION MAY BE: CLASS II PRECAST PIPE (MnDOT STANDARD PLATE 3000); CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF CLASS II PIPE; OR MASONRY CONSTRUCTION, BRICK OR BLOCK (MnDOT STANDARD PLATE 4000). PROVIDE MORTAR FILLETS TO FIT BOTTOM PORTIONS OF PIPE TO DIRECT FLOW TO OUTLET. 1 2 3 4 MANHOLE OR CATCH BASIN CONCRETE COVER 1 4020 MANHOLE OR CATCH BASIN NTS 'T'1.5"CLEAR1.5"CLEARA1.5"CLEA R A MANHOLE DIAMETER COVER DIAMETER REINFORCING AND EXTRA BARS (SEE MnDOT STANDARD PLATE 4020) 2" MINIMUM PLUG DIAMETER OPTIONAL HANDLING DEVICE REINFORCEMENT (SEE MnDOT STANDARD PLATE 4020) PLAN OF COVER TOP BARS NOT SHOWN SECTION A-A MIN. OF THREE HANDLING HOLES AT 120° SPACING 27" DIA OPENINGNOTES: AASHTO HS 25 LOADING THE NO. 4020 SHALL BE PERMANENTLY MARKED ON THE TOP OF THE COVER. EQUIVALENT STEEL AREAS IN WIRE MESH MAY BE USED. SEE MnDOT STANDARD PLATE 4020 FOR DIMENSIONS & REINFORCEMENT. 4020 MANHOLE OR CATCH BASIN CONCRETE COVER NTS TRENCH WIDTH, SEE TABLE 1 1 6" GRANULAR BEDDING PIPE OD (BC)12"COMPACTED BACKFILL 0.15 BC STORM DRAIN PIPE BACKFILL W/GRANULAR MATERIAL OR SELECT MATERIAL FROM EXCAVATION TO 6" ABOVE PIPE TRENCH WIDTH PIPE Ø TRENCH WIDTH 36" OR LESS BC + 24" 42" TO 54"1.5 x BC 60" OR OVER BC + 36" NOTES: GRANULAR BEDDING AND BACKFILL FOR STORM DRAIN PIPES SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO STORM DRAIN CONSTRUCTION 0.6 BC NON-CONCRETE STORM DRAIN PIPE BEDDING NTS TRENCH WIDTH, SEE TABLE PIPE OD (Bc) 0.15 BC12"1 1 COMPACTED BACKFILL STORM DRAIN PIPE 6" GRANULAR BEDDING TRENCH WIDTH PIPE Ø TRENCH WIDTH 36" OR LESS Bc + 24" 42" TO 54"1.5 x Bc 60" OR OVER Bc + 36" NOTES: GRANULAR BEDDING AND BACKFILL FOR STORM DRAIN PIPES SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO STORM DRAIN CONSTRUCTION 0.6 Bc BACKFILL W/GRANULAR MATERIAL OR SELECT MATERIAL FROM EXCAVATION TO SPRINGLINE REINFORCED CONCRETE STORM DRAIN PIPE BEDDING NTS NOTE: CLEANOUT LINE TO BE THE SAME DIAMETER AS DRAIN TILE AND SHALL BE TYPE PSM, PVC SEWER PIPE, SDR 35. SEE PLANS FOR SIZE. GRADE THREADED, INTERNAL NUT PLUG MARK WITH BURIED METAL FOR METAL DETECTION 45° LONG RADIUS BEND WYE END OF DRAIN TILE DRILL 18" HOLE AND STUB 6" OF TRACER WIRE LONG SWEEP 90° SANITARY TEE TRACER WIRE OPTION 1 OPTION 2 SANITARY CLEANOUT NTS 54" BASE SLAB 5"2.5'-4.0'5"5"3'42"BASE SLAB2'5"5"CASTING ASSEMBLY (SEE SCHEDULES) ADJUSTING RINGS AS REQUIRED PRECAST CONCRETE CATCH BASIN POUR CONCRETE INVERT SLOPE 1"/FT TO PIPE(S) PRECAST CONC BASE SLAB INFI-SHIELD WRAP EXTERNAL MANHOLE SEAL OR APPROVED EQUAL OPENINGS FOR PIPES AS REQUIRED SECTION VIEW PLAN VIEW NOTES: INFI-SHIELD WRAP EXTERNAL MANHOLE SEAL, OR APPROVED EQUAL, SHALL BE PLACED AROUND CASTING AND ADJUSTING RINGS. TYPE 1 CATCH BASIN NTS DROP PAY HEIGHT4" SANITARY SERVICE F&I: 1-4" WYE F&I: 1-4x90° BEND ANCHOR TO INSIDE WALL WITH STAINLESS STEEL STRAPS & BOLTS FLEXIBLE WATER TIGHT PIPE BOOT AS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER TYPICAL SANITARY MANHOLE INSIDE DROP SANITARY MANHOLE NTS 25154 C0B DETAILS DATE DESCRIPTION BY PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,FILE LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\25000 PROJ\25100-25199\25154 UHAUL-APPLE VALLEY MN\25154 CIVIL-SURVEY\CIVIL PRODUCTION DRAWINGS\25154 C0B DETAILS.DWG- 21-25154 --/--/-- C0-21 SITE DETAILS C0-21 SITE DETAILS ---- ---- C0-21 MINNESOTAAPPLE VALLEY LCH LCH RJA U-HAUL U-BOX LIC. NO.DATE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT DATE: 9/30/2021 12:48 PMRYAN J. ANDERSON XX/XX/21 55938 NOTE: THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN MISINTERPRETATION. 25154 C1 SWPPP DATE DESCRIPTION BY PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,FILE LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\25000 PROJ\25100-25199\25154 UHAUL-APPLE VALLEY MN\25154 CIVIL-SURVEY\CIVIL PRODUCTION DRAWINGS\25154 C1 SWPPP.DWG- 21-25154 --/--/-- C1-10 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN NARRATIVE C1-10 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN NARRATIVE ---- ---- C1-10 MINNESOTAAPPLE VALLEY LCH LCH RJA U-HAUL U-BOX LIC. NO.DATE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT DATE: 9/29/2021 3:09 PMRYAN J. ANDERSON XX/XX/21 55938 NOTE: THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN MISINTERPRETATION. 25154 C1 SWPPP DATE DESCRIPTION BY PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,FILE LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\25000 PROJ\25100-25199\25154 UHAUL-APPLE VALLEY MN\25154 CIVIL-SURVEY\CIVIL PRODUCTION DRAWINGS\25154 C1 SWPPP.DWG- 21-25154 --/--/-- C1-20 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN DETAILS C1-20 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN DETAILS ---- ---- C1-20 MINNESOTAAPPLE VALLEY LCH LCH RJA U-HAUL U-BOX LIC. NO.DATE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT DATE: 9/29/2021 3:09 PMRYAN J. ANDERSON XX/XX/21 55938 NOTE: THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN MISINTERPRETATION. 2'1' MIN3' DEEP10'NATIVE MATERIAL 5'x10'x3' CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA 1' DEEP IMPERVIOUS CLAY LINER MINIMUM 10-MIL THICK PLASTIC SHEETING OR APPROVED EQUAL NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL A SIGN INDICATING THE CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN WASHOUT AREA TO REMOVE MATERIALS BEYOND 75% CAPACITY. WASHOUT AREA SHALL NOT BE PLACED WITHIN 50' OF STORM DRAINS, OPEN DITCHES OR BODIES OF WATER. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT WASHOUT AREA AS NECESSARY TO PREVENT LEAKS AND OVER TOPPING. WASHOUT AREA SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE. CONCRETE WASHOUT NTS ENTRANCE WIDTH AS REQUIRED50' MINIMUMINPLACE SURFACE6" MINIMUM DEPTH OF 1" TO 2" CRUSHED ROCK OR SLASH MULCH LOOSEN AS NEEDED SO THAT ENTRANCE IS NOT COMPACTED, REPLACE/CLEAN AGGREGATE ONCE DIRTY MnDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 3733 TYPE V PERMEABLE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC BENEATH ROCK OR SLASH MULCH 18" HIGH (MIN) CUT OFF BERM TO MINIMIZE RUNOFF FROM LEAVING SITE EXTEND SILT FENCE FROM EITHER SIDE OF BERM AS NEEDED STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT NTS STAINLESS STEEL CLAMPING BAND 11 GA GALVANIZED STEEL SUSPENSION SYSTEM LIFT HANDLES REPLACEABLE SEDIMENT BAGS WITH GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC STANDARD 2" OVERFLOW AREA NOTES: FOR SPECIFICATIONS AND MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES VISIT WWW.INLETFILTERS.COM INSTALLATION: REMOVE GRATE DROP FLEXSTORM INLET FILTER ONTO LOAD BEARING LIP OF CASTING OR CONCRETE STRUCTURE REPLACE GRATE MATERIALS: FRAMING - 11 GAUGE STEEL; CORROSION RESISTANT SEDIMENT BAG - WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC; 2 CUBIC FOOT TYP VOLUME; STAINLESS STEEL LOCKING BAND SECURING BAG TO FRAME ROUND FILTER INLET PROTECTION NTS STANDARD 2" OVERFLOW AREA 11 GA GALVANIZED STEEL SUSPENSION SYSTEM LIFT HANDLES REPLACEABLE SEDIMENT BAGS WITH GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC REAR CURB GUARD FLAP WITH MAGNETIC TIE DOWNS (SLIDE 2x4 THROUGH FLAP IF IRON CURB BACK NOT AVAILABLE) NOTES: FOR SPECIFICATIONS AND MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES VISIT WWW.INLETFILTERS.COM INSTALLATION: REMOVE GRATE DROP FLEXSTORM INLET FILTER ONTO LOAD BEARING LIP OF CASTING OR CONCRETE STRUCTURE REPLACE GRATE MATERIALS: FRAMING - 11 GAUGE STEEL; CORROSION RESISTANT SEDIMENT BAG - WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC; 2 CUBIC FOOT TYP VOLUME; STAINLESS STEEL LOCKING BAND SECURING BAG TO FRAME CURB BOX FILTER INLET PROTECTION NTS SILT FENCES TO BE CONSTRUCTED ON DOWNHILL SIDE OF ALL MANHOLES MIN 6"MIN6" RUNOFF FLOW DIRECTION OF POSTEMBEDMENT1.5' MIN24" MINGEOTEXTILE FABRIC 5' TEE POST AT 5' - 4' MAX SPACING FABRIC ANCHORAGE TRENCH BACKFILL WITH TAMPED NATURAL SOIL SILT FENCE NTS 1' EMBED IN 2" DEEP TRENCH SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG NOTES: SEDIMENT CONTROL LOGS TO BE 6" DIAMETER UNLESS OTHEWISE NOTED. STAKED INTO THE GROUND WITH WOOD STAKES. WOOD STAKES ARE A MINIMUM OF 2"x16"x12" UNLESS PRECLUDED BY PAVED SURFACE OR ROCK. WOOD STAKES DRIVEN THROUGH BACK HALF OF SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG AT AN APPROXIMATE ANGLE OF 45° WITH THE TOP OF STAKE POINTING UP STREAM. WHEN MORE THAN ONE SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG IS NEEDED, OVERLAP ENDS A MINIMUM OF 6" AND STAKE SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG STAKING NTS FLOW SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG 6" C.S.A.H. NO. 42 (150TH STREET WEST) (75 Foot Right of Way) 75' Highway Easement (Doc No. 581296, Item 10 Schedule B)20' Storm Sewer Easement(Doc No. 59140, Item 11 Schedule B)XXXXXXXLimited Access Dedication Drainage & Utility Easement Drainage & Utility Easement 151ST STREET WEST (64 Foot Right of Way) >> >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> GM>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> EXISTING BUILDING FFE = 950.20 >>>>>>>>>>PROPOSED BUILDING 12,230 SQ. FT. FFE = 950.55 >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>IIIIIGM >>950 950 950 950951 9 5 0 9 5 0 948949949 950949951950 949951 950950 947948949950 949950 PCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPC25154 C1 SWPPP DATE DESCRIPTION BY PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,FILE LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\25000 PROJ\25100-25199\25154 UHAUL-APPLE VALLEY MN\25154 CIVIL-SURVEY\CIVIL PRODUCTION DRAWINGS\25154 C1 SWPPP.DWG- 21-25154 --/--/-- C1-30 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C1-30 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN ---- ---- C1-30 MINNESOTAAPPLE VALLEY 0 SCALE IN FEET 20 40 LCH LCH RJA U-HAUL U-BOX LIC. NO.DATE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT DATE: 9/29/2021 3:09 PMRYAN J. ANDERSON XX/XX/21 55938 NOTE: THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN MISINTERPRETATION. EROSION CONTROL LEGEND SYMBOL DESCRIPTION PERIMETER CONTROL STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA EXISTING DRAINAGE ARROW PROPOSED DRAINAGE ARROW EXISTING CONTOUR (MINOR INTERVAL) EXISTING CONTOUR (MAJOR INTERVAL) PROPOSED CONTOUR (MINOR INTERVAL) PROPOSED CONTOUR (MAJOR INTERVAL) PERIMETER CONTROL CAN BE SILT FENCE OR SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG. SEE SITE RESTORATION PLAN FOR FINAL TURF ESTABLISHMENT. NOTE: SWPPP COVERAGE INCLUDES ELECTRIC, GAS, TELEPHONE, AND CABLE INSTALLATION. EACH COMPANY OR THEIR SUBCONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO FOLLOW THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS SWPPP INCLUDING PROVIDING THEIR OWN RESTORATION IF INSTALLATION OCCURS AFTER PRIMARY INSTALLATION OF SEEDING/SODDING/MULCHING DURING CONSTRUCTION OF EACH UTILITY. PC 101 100 101 100 OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE XXXXXXXXXC.S.A.H. NO. 42 (150TH STREET WEST) (75 Foot Right of Way) 75' Highway Easement (Doc No. 581296, Item 10 Schedule B)20' Storm Sewer Easement(Doc No. 59140, Item 11 Schedule B)XXXXXXXLimited Access Dedication Drainage & Utility Easement Drainage & Utility EasementXXXXXXXXX 151ST STREET WEST (64 Foot Right of Way) >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GM EX CB R=948.18 I=945.18 (SE) EX CB T/C=948.22 I=944.76 (NW) I=944.76 (E) EX CB T/C=948.72 I=944.67 (W) I=944.62 (E) EX CB T/C=949.23 I=944.49 (W) I=944.49 (E) EX CB T/C=948.20 I=943.87 (N) I=943.82 (W) I=943.67 (E) EX CB T/C=948.20 I=943.09 (W) I=943.09 (E) EX MH R=949.44 I=942.66 (W) I=942.43 (E) I=941.43 (N) I=941.43 (S) EX SAN MH R=950.08 I=926.52 (W) I=926.52 (E) EX SAN MH R=948.79 I=926.03 (W) I=926.03 (E) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> EX STM MH R=949.64 I=945.64 (N) I=945.56 (S) EX STM MH R=949.56 I=946.57 (S)>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>EX STM MH R=949.60 I=945.45 (N) EX STM MH R=949.53 I=945.93 (N) I =945.93 (S) EX ST MH R=949.73 I=944.63 (S) I=943.83 (W) I=943.83 (E) EX STM MH R=949.10 I=946.00 (NE) EX STM MH R=950.88 I=945.18 (SW) I=944.70 (N) I=944.70 (E) EX CB T/C=953.29 I=949.06 (N) I=949.06 (S) EX CB T/C=954.81 I=951.15 (N) SUMP=949.25 EX CB T/C=957.26 I=952.76 (N) SUMP=951.14 EX CB T/C=949.21 I=945.25 (E) EX STM MH R=949.38 I=944.80 (W) I=942.52 (N) I=942.52 (S) EX STM MH R=951.86 I=943.53 (SE) I=942.91 (W) I=942.91 (S) 12" RCP APRON I=946.44>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> EXISTING BUILDING FFE = 950.20 >>>>>>>>>>EX EX MH R=949.60 I=946.50 25154 C2 EXISTING DATE DESCRIPTION BY PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,FILE LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\25000 PROJ\25100-25199\25154 UHAUL-APPLE VALLEY MN\25154 CIVIL-SURVEY\CIVIL PRODUCTION DRAWINGS\25154 C2 EXISTING.DWG- 21-25154 --/--/-- C2-10 EXISTING SITE & REMOVALS PLAN C2-10 EXISTING SITE & REMOVALS PLAN ---- ---- C2-10 MINNESOTAAPPLE VALLEY 0 SCALE IN FEET 20 40 LCH LCH RJA U-HAUL U-BOX LIC. NO.DATE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT DATE: 9/29/2021 4:21 PMRYAN J. ANDERSON XX/XX/21 55938 NOTE: THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN MISINTERPRETATION. PROTECT STORM SEWER (TYP) REMOVE MANHOLE REMOVE TREE (TYP) PROTECT TREES (TYP) SAWCUT TO REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT REMOVE FENCE (TYP) LOT LINE (TYP) PROPERTY LINE (TYP) IMPERVIOUS SETBACK (TYP) SAWCUT TO REMOVE CURB & GUTTER (TYP) REMOVE RETAINING WALL (TYP) REMOVE RETAINING WALLS AND GATE REMOVE STORM SEWER PROTECT CATCH BASIN BUILDING SETBACK (TYP) REMOVAL LEGEND SYMBOL DESCRIPTION REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT REMOVE DECIDUOUS TREE (CLEAR AND GRUB) REMOVE CONIFEROUS TREE (CLEAR AND GRUB) CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING PAVEMENT SECTION AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. PAVEMENT REMOVALS SHALL INCLUDE FULL DEPTH SAWCUT AND SECTION REMOVAL. REMOVE LIGHT POLE REMOVE LIGHT POLE PROTECT LIGHT POLES PROTECT LIGHT POLE REMOVE CATCH BASIN BULKHEAD STORM SEWER AND PROTECT 17 6 11 188 PROPOSED BUILDING 12,230 SQ. FT. FFE = 950.55 C.S.A.H. NO. 42 (150TH STREET WEST) (75 Foot Right of Way) 75' Highway Easement (Doc No. 581296, Item 10 Schedule B)20' Storm Sewer Easement(Doc No. 59140, Item 11 Schedule B)XXXXXXXLimited Access Dedication Drainage & Utility Easement Drainage & Utility Easement 151ST STREET WEST (64 Foot Right of Way) GM EXISTING BUILDING FFE = 950.20 GM 25154 C3 SITE DATE DESCRIPTION BY PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,FILE LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\25000 PROJ\25100-25199\25154 UHAUL-APPLE VALLEY MN\25154 CIVIL-SURVEY\CIVIL PRODUCTION DRAWINGS\25154 C3 SITE.DWG- 21-25154 --/--/-- C3-10 SITE PLAN C3-10 SITE PLAN ---- ---- C3-10 MINNESOTAAPPLE VALLEY 0 SCALE IN FEET 20 40 LCH LCH RJA U-HAUL U-BOX LIC. NO.DATE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT DATE: 10/5/2021 4:45 PMRYAN J. ANDERSON XX/XX/21 55938 NOTE: THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN MISINTERPRETATION. B612 CURB & GUTTER (TYP) LOT LINE (TYP) PROPERTY LINE (TYP) CONCRETE PAVEMENT (TYP) STRIPING (TYP) IMPERVIOUS SETBACK (TYP) BUILDING SETBACK (TYP) CANOPY STRUCTURE (SEE ARCH)12'20' 25.56' 25.56'19.59'101.69'107.92'12'10.39'9'19.5'2 1 . 3 6 ' R5'R3' R5' R3'R2' R5' 3' CURB TAPER TRANSITION PAVEMENT TO BE FLUSH WITH CURB PAVEMENT LEGEND SYMBOL DESCRIPTION CONCRETE PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT REVERSE PITCH CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER R7'38.75'24.25' LOADING DOCK (SEE STRUCTURAL) RETAINING WALL (SEE STRUCTURAL)24' 17 6 11 188 PROPOSED BUILDING 12,230 SQ. FT. FFE = 950.55 OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE C.S.A.H. NO. 42 (150TH STREET WEST) (75 Foot Right of Way) 75' Highway Easement (Doc No. 581296, Item 10 Schedule B)20' Storm Sewer Easement(Doc No. 59140, Item 11 Schedule B)XXXXXXXLimited Access Dedication Drainage & Utility Easement Drainage & Utility Easement 151ST STREET WEST (64 Foot Right of Way) >> >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> GM EX CB T/C=948.72 I=944.67 (W) I=944.62 (E) EX CB T/C=949.23 I=944.49 (W) I=944.49 (E) EX CB T/C=948.20 I=943.87 (N) I=943.82 (W) I=943.67 (E) EX CB T/C=948.20 I=943.09 (W) I=943.09 (E) EX MH R=949.44 I=942.66 (W) I=942.43 (E) I=941.43 (N) I=941.43 (S) EX SAN MH R=950.08 I=926.52 (W) I=926.52 (E) EX SAN MH R=948.79 I=926.03 (W) I=926.03 (E) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> EX STM MH R=949.64 I=945.64 (N) I=945.56 (S) EX STM MH R=949.56 I=946.57 (S)>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>EX STM MH R=949.60 I=945.45 (N) EX STM MH R=949.53 I=945.93 (N) I =945.93 (S) EX ST MH R=949.73 I=944.63 (S) I=943.83 (W) I=943.83 (E)EX STM MH R=950.88 I=945.18 (SW) I=944.70 (N) I=944.70 (E) EX CB T/C=953.29 I=949.06 (N) I=949.06 (S) EX CB T/C=954.81 I=951.15 (N) SUMP=949.25 EX CB T/C=957.26 I=952.76 (N) SUMP=951.14 EX CB T/C=949.21 I=945.25 (E) EX STM MH R=949.38 I=944.80 (W) I=942.52 (N) I=942.52 (S) EX STM MH R=951.86 I=943.53 (SE) I=942.91 (W) I=942.91 (S) 12" RCP APRON I=946.44>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> EXISTING BUILDING FFE = 950.20 >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>IIIIIGGGGM >>UEUEP-1 80'x8" @ 0.25% P-5 62'x12" @ 0.45% P-4 55'x12" @ 0.45% P-3 32'x12" @ 0.50% P-6 26'x8" @ 1.00% P-6A 30'x10" @ 2.00% ST-1 R=946.49 I=944.82 (8'') P-1 ST-5 R=949.40 I=946.84 (12'') P-5 ST-4 R=949.48 I=946.56 (12'') P-5 I=946.36 (12'') P-4 ST-3 R=949.62 I=946.11 (12'') P-4 I=945.91 (12'') P-3 ST-2A R=950.05 I=945.75 (12'') P-3 I=943.66 (12'') SE INLET I=945.75 (12'') MANIFOLDST-6 R=949.46 I=946.21 (8'') P-6 ST-2C R=949.27 I=945.75 (12'') MANIFOLD I=946.00 (12'') EX P-2 I=943.66 (12'') NW INLET ST-2B R=949.49 I=945.75 (12'') NE INLET ST-6A R=950.03 I=945.95 (8'') P-6 I=945.95 (10'') P-6A I=945.75 (12'') SW INLET STORM DRAIN STRUCTURE SCHEDULE STRUCTURE NO. ST-1 ST-2A ST-2B ST-2C ST-3 ST-4 ST-5 ST-6 ST-6A STRUCTURE TYPE CATCH BASIN (TYPE 1) MnDOT 4020 MnDOT 4020 MnDOT 4020 MnDOT 4020 MnDOT 4020 MnDOT 4020 NYLOPLAST DRAIN BASIN MnDOT 4020 STRUCTURE SIZE (IN) 36 x 24 48 Ø 48 Ø 48 Ø 48 Ø 48 Ø 48 Ø 8 Ø 48 Ø STRUCTURE MATERIAL RC RC RC RC RC RC RC PVC RC CASTING NEENAH R-1878-B7G NEENAH R-1733 "STORM SEWER" IN COVER NEENAH R-2502 NEENAH R-2502 NEENAH R-2502 NEENAH R-2502 NEENAH R-2502 NYLOPLAST 0899CGS NEENAH R-1733 "STORM SEWER" IN COVER PAY HEIGHT (LN FT) 1.67 6.39 3.74 5.61 3.71 3.12 2.56 3.26 4.28 * TOP OF CASTING ELEVATION 946.49 950.05 949.49 949.27 949.62 949.48 949.40 949.46 950.03 INVERT ELEVATION 944.82 943.66 945.75 943.66 945.91 946.36 946.84 946.21 945.75 STORM DRAIN PIPE SCHEDULE PIPE NO. P-1 P-3 P-4 P-5 P-6 P-6A DRAIN FROM ST-1 ST-3 ST-4 ST-5 ST-6 ROOF LEADER INLET ELEVATION 944.82 945.91 946.36 946.84 946.21 946.55 DRAIN TO EX ST-0 ST-2A ST-3 ST-4 ST-6A ST-6A OUTLET ELEVATION 944.62 945.75 946.11 946.56 945.95 945.95 PIPE SIZE (IN) 8 12 12 12 8 10 MATERIAL PVC RCP RCP RCP HDPE PVC PIPE CLASS SCH 40 CL V CL V CL V TYPE S SCH 40 PIPE GRADE 0.25% 0.50% 0.45% 0.45% 1.00% 2.00% PIPE LENGTH (FT) 80 32 55 62 26 30 25154 C3 SITE DATE DESCRIPTION BY PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,FILE LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\25000 PROJ\25100-25199\25154 UHAUL-APPLE VALLEY MN\25154 CIVIL-SURVEY\CIVIL PRODUCTION DRAWINGS\25154 C3 SITE.DWG- 21-25154 --/--/-- C3-20 UTILITY PLAN C3-20 UTILITY PLAN ---- ---- C3-20 MINNESOTAAPPLE VALLEY 0 SCALE IN FEET 20 40 LCH LCH RJA U-HAUL U-BOX LIC. NO.DATE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT DATE: 10/5/2021 4:45 PMRYAN J. ANDERSON XX/XX/21 55938 NOTE: THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN MISINTERPRETATION. UTILITY LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED STORM DRAIN SANITARY SEWER SANITARY SEWER FORCEMAIN WATER MAIN GAS OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND TV OVERHEAD UTILITY UNDERGROUND UTILITY FIBER OPTIC NOTE: CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. >>>> >><IIII>IIG G OE OE UE UE UT UT UTV OHL UTL FBO ISOLATOR ROW (TYP) UNDERGROUND STORM SYSTEM 66 MC-3500 ADS STORMTECH CHAMBERS BOTTOM = 942.80 100-YEAR HWL = 948.22 TOP = 948.30 12" HDPE MANIFOLD (TYP) GAS SERVICE WATER SERVICE 4" SANITARY SERVICE @ 2% SANITARY CLEANOUT RIM=950.31 INV=941.72 GAS METER CONNECT EXISTING STORM SEWER (EX P-2) TO STRUCTURE. CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT EX P-2 COORDINATE ROOF LEADER CONNECTION WITH ARCH CONNECT CANOPY DRAIN TO STORM SEWER INV=940.00 INSTALL INSIDE DROP MANHOLE CONNECTION PROPOSED TRANSFORMER CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM STRUCTURE INV=944.62 OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE C.S.A.H. NO. 42 (150TH STREET WEST) (75 Foot Right of Way) 75' Highway Easement (Doc No. 581296, Item 10 Schedule B)20' Storm Sewer Easement(Doc No. 59140, Item 11 Schedule B)XXXXXXXLimited Access Dedication Drainage & Utility Easement Drainage & Utility Easement 151ST STREET WEST (64 Foot Right of Way) >> >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> GM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> EXISTING BUILDING FFE = 950.20 >>>>>>>>>>17 6 11 188 PROPOSED BUILDING 12,230 SQ. FT. FFE = 950.55 >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>IIIIIGM >>950 950 948 948 94 9 949 95 1 951 949 9 5 0 949950949 949 951 950 950 950 950951 9 5 1 951950950950 950 951 950 9499479489499509509 5 0 950.30950.18950.07950.55950.55950.55949.93949.54949.53950.55950.10950.55950.55946.49949.40949.48949.62950.06949.49949.81949.27949.81949.79950.55950.55950.55949.29M A T C H 949.31MATCH949.30MATCH948.80MATCH948.43M A T C H949.80949.73MATCH949.58MATCH949.04MATCH950.08MATCH949.85MATCH949.93MATCH949.86MATCH949.77MATCH949.85MATCH949.87MATCH949.79MATCH949.74MATCH949.29MATCH949.01MATCH948.87M A T C H 949.14MATCH949.16MATCH948.78MATCH948.45MATCH948.59MATCH948.43MATCH947.89MATCH950.55950.55950.02950.31950.05950.60HP950.31950.99949.72950.08950.09950.12950.16950.00950.01949.54950.55949.34949.36949.39949.41948.78948.78948.53948.48949.46950.44HP949.66SWALE949.55SWALE950950.04946.64946.64-4.5% 25154 C4 GRADING DATE DESCRIPTION BY PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,FILE LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\25000 PROJ\25100-25199\25154 UHAUL-APPLE VALLEY MN\25154 CIVIL-SURVEY\CIVIL PRODUCTION DRAWINGS\25154 C4 GRADING.DWG- 21-25154 --/--/-- C4-10 GRADING PLAN C4-10 GRADING PLAN ---- ---- C4-10 MINNESOTAAPPLE VALLEY 0 SCALE IN FEET 20 40 LCH LCH RJA U-HAUL U-BOX LIC. NO.DATE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT DATE: 10/5/2021 5:03 PMRYAN J. ANDERSON XX/XX/21 55938 NOTE: THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN MISINTERPRETATION. GRADING LEGEND EXISTING CONTOUR (MINOR INTERVAL) EXISTING CONTOUR (MAJOR INTERVAL) PROPOSED CONTOUR (MINOR INTERVAL) PROPOSED CONTOUR (MAJOR INTERVAL) PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION PROPOSED TOP BACK OF CURB SPOT ELEVATION SURFACE GRADE / DIRECTION GENERAL GRADING NOTES PROPOSED CONTOURS SHOW FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS. BUILDING PAD AND PAVEMENT HOLD DOWNS ARE NOT INCLUDED. WHEN CONSTRUCTING BUILDING PADS WITH A HOLD DOWN, GRADE AREAS TO ENSURE POSITIVE BUILDING PAD DRAINAGE. 101 100 101 100 XXX.XXXXX.XX-X.X% OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE C.S.A.H. NO. 42 (150TH STREET WEST) (75 Foot Right of Way) 75' Highway Easement (Doc No. 581296, Item 10 Schedule B)20' Storm Sewer Easement(Doc No. 59140, Item 11 Schedule B)XXXXXXX151ST STREET WEST (64 Foot Right of Way) >> >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> GM EX CB T/C=948.72 I=944.67 (W) I=944.62 (E) EX CB T/C=949.23 I=944.49 (W) I=944.49 (E) EX CB T/C=948.20 I=943.87 (N) I=943.82 (W) I=943.67 (E) EX CB T/C=948.20 I=943.09 (W) I=943.09 (E) EX SAN MH R=950.08 I=926.52 (W) I=926.52 (E) EX SAN MH R=948.79 I=926.03 (W) I=926.03 (E) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> EX STM MH R=949.64 I=945.64 (N) I=945.56 (S) EX STM MH R=949.56 I=946.57 (S)>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>EX STM MH R=949.60 I=945.45 (N) EX STM MH R=949.53 I=945.93 (N) I =945.93 (S) EX ST MH R=949.73 I=944.63 (S) I=943.83 (W) I=943.83 (E)EX STM MH R=950.88 I=945.18 (SW) I=944.70 (N) I=944.70 (E) EX CB T/C=953.29 I=949.06 (N) I=949.06 (S) EX CB T/C=954.81 I=951.15 (N) SUMP=949.25 EX CB T/C=949.21 I=945.25 (E)>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> EXISTING BUILDING FFE = 950.20 >>>>>>>>>>PROPOSED BUILDING 12,230 SQ. FT. FFE = 950.55 (5) AB (3) GA (1) LE (2) PC (1) LE (3) GA (154) EV (148) AG (52) PA (10) RG 949 949 950950948 949 950 950 949 948 949 949 950 951 950 949 949 949949 949 950951951949950 951 951 950 949 95 0 949950 950 950 950 951 951 952 953 951 951 952 953 954 950950 950950950948949950 950 949 949950 949 950 948 949 EVERGREEN TREES CODE QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE ROOT AB 5 ABIES BALSAMEA 8` HT MIN B & B BALSAM FIR LE 3 LARIX DECIDUA 8` HT MIN B & B EUROPEAN LARCH PC 2 PICEA PUNGENS 8` HT MIN B & B COLORADO SPRUCE OVERSTORY TREES CODE QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE ROOT GA 6 GINKGO BILOBA 'AUTUMN GOLD' TM 3" CAL B & B AUTUMN GOLD MAIDENHAIR TREE DECIDUOUS SHRUBS CODE QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE ROOT RG 10 RHUS AROMATICA `GRO-LOW`5 GAL CONT GRO-LOW FRAGRANT SUMAC GRASSES CODE QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE ROOT AG 148 ANDROPOGON GERARDII 2 GAL CONT BIG BLUESTEM EV 154 ELYMUS VIRGINICUS 2 GAL CONT VIRGINIA WILD RYE PA 52 PYCNANTHEMUM ALBESCENS 2 GAL CONT MOUNTAIN MINT MULCH QTY DESCRIPTION 3,653 SF 3" DIA CLEAN WASHED RIVER ROCK 6" DEPTH SEEDING QTY DESCRIPTION 5,866 SF MNDOT SEED MIXTURE 25-131 (TURF) EDGING QTY DESCRIPTION 340 LF BLACK POLY OR VINYL EDGING PLANT SCHEDULE 25154 C5 PLANTING DATE DESCRIPTION BY PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,FILE LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\25000 PROJ\25100-25199\25154 UHAUL-APPLE VALLEY MN\25154 CIVIL-SURVEY\CIVIL PRODUCTION DRAWINGS\25154 C5 PLANTING.DWG- 21-25154 --/--/-- C5-10 SITE RESTORATION & PLANTING PLAN C5-10 SITE RESTORATION & PLANTING PLAN ---- ---- C5-10 MINNESOTAAPPLE VALLEY 0 SCALE IN FEET 20 40 AE AE MRW U-HAUL U-BOX LIC. NO.DATE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT DATE: 10/5/2021 4:28 PMRYAN J. ANDERSON XX/XX/21 55938 NOTE: THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN MISINTERPRETATION. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY REQUIREMENTS LANDSCAPE AREAS: FOR DEVELOPMENTS HAVING A CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN EXCESS OF $1,000,000 SHALL PROVIDE A PLANTING PLAN WITH THE MINIMUM COST OF PLANTING MATERIAL BEING A PERCENTAGE OF BUILDING COST. FOR COMMERCIAL PROJECTS THE LANDSCAPING SHALL BE A MINIUM OF 2 1 2 % OF BUILDING COST. ·BUILDING SIZE = 12,230 SF ·APPROXIMATELY $1,210,000 X 0.025 = ($30,250) OF LANDSCAPING REQUIRED / 16 TREES + 354 GRASSES ($12,000) PROVIDED PARKING: LANDSCAPED ISLANDS SHALL BE PROVIDED IN PARKING LOTS CONTAINING MORE THAN 25 PARKING STALLS. TOTAL AREA OF ISLAND SHALL BE AT LEAST 2% OF THE PARKING LOT AREA. PARKING ISLANDS SHALL BE PLANTED WITH A MINIMUM 2 1 2 INCH CALIPER TREE AT THE RATE OF ONE TREE PER 150 SF OF ISLAND AREA.. ·52 EXISTING STALLS / 2 EXISTING LANDSCAPE ISLANDS ( 2 TREES) ·PROPOSED PARKING LOT AREA 10,590 SF X 0.02 = 212 SF OF LANDSCAPE AREA REQUIRED / 225 LANDSCAPE AREA PROVIDED ·8 ADDITIONAL PROPOSED STALLS / 1 PROPOSED LANDSCAPE ISLAND ·PARKING ISLAND TREES 225 / 150 = 1 TREE REQUIRED (1 TREE PROVIDED) 25154 C5 PLANTING DATE DESCRIPTION BY PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,FILE LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\25000 PROJ\25100-25199\25154 UHAUL-APPLE VALLEY MN\25154 CIVIL-SURVEY\CIVIL PRODUCTION DRAWINGS\25154 C5 PLANTING.DWG- 21-25154 --/--/-- C5-20 PLANTING NOTES & DETAILS C5-20 PLANTING NOTES & DETAILS ---- ---- C5-20 MINNESOTAAPPLE VALLEY AE AE MRW U-HAUL U-BOX LIC. NO.DATE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT DATE: 10/5/2021 4:28 PMRYAN J. ANDERSON XX/XX/21 55938 NOTE: THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN MISINTERPRETATION. TOP OF ROOTBALL TO BE SET ABOVE GRADE 3" CUT AND REMOVE AT MINIMUM THE TOP HALF OF WIRE BASKETS, BURLAP AND/OR TWINE AND REMOVE FROM THE PLANTING PIT. AVOID CUTTING OR SCARING ROOTS. ANY ROOTS THAT ARE SCARED OR BROKEN DURING PLANTING SHOULD BE CUT CLEAN AT 90 DEGREES BACKFILL PLANTING PIT PER TREE PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS WHEN PROVIDED, OR WITH NATIVE SOIL-EXCEPT WHEN IN HEAVY CLAY, MIX AMENDED TOPSOIL FROM A LOCAL SOURCE WITH NATIVE SOIL EXCAVATE PLANTING PIT TO A DEPTH EQUAL TO THE DEPTH OF THE ROOTBALL MINUS 3" AND A MINIMUM TWICE THE DIAMETER OF THE ROOTBALL PLACE ROOTBALL ON UNDISTURBED SOIL AND ENSURE TRUNK OF TREES IS PLUMB 3" LAYER OF DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH (NATURAL COLOR) MOUNDED AT EDGE TO FORM A SHALLOW SAUCER - DO NOT PLACE MULCH DIRECTLY ON TREE TRUNK, LEAVE A MIN. 3" RING AROUND CROWN. WHEN PLACED IN PLANTING BED USE PLANTING BED MULCH SPECIFIED ROOTBALL DIA 2X ROOTBALL DIA DEPTH OF ROOTBALL NEVER CUT PRIMARY LEADER PRUNE ALL BROKEN, DAMAGED, OR RUBBING LIMBS AND BRANCHES IMMEDIATELY AFTER PLANTING - ALL PRUNING CUTS CLEAN AT 90 DEGREES TIE NYLON STRAP AROUND TRUNK AS SHOWN 1/2" WIDE NYLON STRAPPING - COLOR TO BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FINISH GRADE TREES 8'+TREES 6'-8' *NOTE: DO NOT STAKE TREES UNLESS INDICATED. HARDWOOD STAKES 2"X2"X8' LONG - INSTALL OUTSIDE OF ROOTBALL AT 5' MAX HT STAKING DIAGRAM, NO STAKING TREES UNDER 6' TIE NYLON STRAP AROUND TRUNK AS SHOWN CUT AND REMOVE AT MINIMUM THE TOP HALF OF WIRE BASKETS, BURLAP AND/OR TWINE AND REMOVE FROM THE PLANTING PIT. AVOID CUTTING OR SCARING ROOTS. ANY ROOTS THAT ARE SCARED OR BROKEN DURING PLANTING SHOULD BE CUT CLEAN AT 90 DEGREES BACKFILL PLANTING PIT PER TREE PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS WHEN PROVIDED, OR WITH NATIVE SOIL-EXCEPT WHEN IN HEAVY CLAY, MIX AMENDED TOPSOIL FROM A LOCAL SOURCE WITH NATIVE SOIL EXCAVATE PLANTING PIT TO A DEPTH EQUAL TO THE DEPTH OF THE ROOTBALL MINUS 3" AND A MINIMUM TWICE THE DIAMETER OF THE ROOTBALL PLACE ROOTBALL ON UNDISTURBED SOIL AND ENSURE TRUNK OF TREES IS PLUMB 3" LAYER OF DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH MOUNDED AT EDGE TO FORM A SHALLOW SAUCER - DO NOT PLACE MULCH DIRECTLY ON TREE TRUNK, LEAVE A MIN. 3" RING AROUND CROWN. WHEN PLACED IN PLANTING BED USE PLANTING BED MULCH SPECIFIED ROOTBALL DIA 2X ROOTBALL DIA DEPTH OF ROOTBALL NEVER CUT PRIMARY LEADER PRUNE ALL BROKEN, DAMAGED, OR RUBBING LIMBS AND BRANCHES IMMEDIATELY AFTER PLANTING - ALL PRUNING CUTS CLEAN AT 90 DEGREES FINISH GRADE TREES 8'+TREES 6'-8'TOP OF ROOTBALL TO BE SET ABOVE GRADE 3" 1/2" WIDE NYLON STRAPPING - COLOR TO BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT *NOTE: DO NOT STAKE TREES UNLESS INDICATED. HARDWOOD STAKES 2"X2"X8' LONG - INSTALL OUTSIDE OF ROOTBALL AT 5' MAX HT STAKING DIAGRAM, NO STAKING TREES UNDER 6' 1.COORDINATE LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES (LINES, DUCTS, CONDUITS, SLEEVES, FOOTINGS, ETC.) WITH LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED LANDSCAPE ELEMENTS . CONTRACTOR SHALL REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO WORK. 2.SAVE AND PROTECT ALL EXISTING TREES NOT NOTED TO BE REMOVED. 3.REMOVE ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND MATERIALS INJURIOUS TO PLANT GROWTH FROM PLANTING PITS AND BEDS PRIOR TO BACKFILLING WITH PLANTING MIX. 4.ANY AREAS OUTSIDE THE LIMIT OF WORK THAT ARE DISTURBED SHALL BE RESTORED TO ITS ORIGINAL CONDITION AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER. 5.LAWN AREAS SHALL HAVE 4" MINIMUM DEPTH OF TOPSOIL. TOPSOIL SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 85% MAXIMUM DENSITY AT OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT. 6.REFER TO PLANTING DETAILS PLAN FOR AMENDED SOIL DEPTH IN PLANTING BEDS AND SURROUNDING TREES. REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR MIX TYPE. 7.FIELD STAKE PLANTINGS ACCORDING TO PLAN. OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE SHALL APPROVE ALL PLANT LOCATIONS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REVISE PLANTING LAYOUT AT TIME OF INSTALLATION. 8.ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE TRUE TO THEIR SCIENTIFIC NAME AND SIZE AS INDICATED IN THE PLANT SCHEDULE. 9.IF DISCREPANCIES EXIST BETWEEN THE NUMBER OF PLANTS DRAWN ON THE PLANTING PLAN AND THE NUMBER OF PLANTS IN THE SCHEDULE, THE PLANTING PLAN SHALL GOVERN. 10.OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REVISE QUANTITIES TO SUIT BUDGET LIMITATIONS. CONTRACTOR'S UNIT BID PRICES SHALL PREVAIL FOR ANY CHANGES IN QUANTITIES. 11.ANY PROPOSED SUBSTITUTIONS OF PLANT SPECIES SHALL BE MADE WITH PLANTS OF EQUIVALENT OVERALL FORM, HEIGHT, BRANCHING HABIT, FLOWER, LEAF, COLOR, FRUIT AND CULTURE, AND ONLY AFTER WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE AND OWNER. 12.ALL PLANT MATERIALS MUST CONFORM TO AMERICAN STANDARDS FOR NURSERY STOCK (A.N.S.I.), LATEST EDITION PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN, WASHINGTON D.C. LARGER SIZED PLANT MATERIALS OF THE SPECIES LISTED MAY BE USED IF THE STOCK CONFORMS TO A.N.S.I. 13.ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE GUARANTEED TO BE IN A LIVE AND HEALTHY GROWING CONDITION FOR ONE FULL GROWING SEASON (ONE YEAR) AFTER FINAL PROJECT ACCEPTANCE OR SHALL BE REPLACED FREE OF CHARGE WITH THE SAME GRADE AND SPECIES. ALL TREES SHALL HAVE A STRONG CENTRAL LEADER. 14.PROVIDE 2" SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH (NATURAL COLOR) 3" DEPTH WITH PERMEABLE WEED BARRIER IN ALL PLANTING BEDS, PARKING ISLANDS, AND MOW STRIP AREAS. FOR TREES NOT LOCATED IN PARKING ISLANDS, OR PLANTING BEDS, PROVIDE DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH RING (NATURAL COLOR) AT 3" DEPTH PER PLANTING DETAILS. 16.PROVIDE 3" RIVER ROCK MULCH AT 6" DEPTH WITH PERMEABLE WEED BARRIER IN ALL PLANTING BEDS, PARKING ISLANDS, AND MOW STRIP AREAS. FOR TREES NOT LOCATED IN PARKING ISLANDS, OR PLANTING BEDS, PROVIDE DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH RING (NATURAL COLOR) AT 3" DEPTH PER PLANTING DETAILS. 17.ALL TURF AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE SEEDED PER PLANS. GENERAL PLANTING NOTES DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL SCALE: 1" = 1'-0 CONIFER / EVERGREEN TREE PLANTING DETAIL SCALE: 1" = 1'-0 DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH (NATURAL COLOR) AT MIN 3" DEPTH OR 3" RIVER ROCK MULCH AT 6" DEPTH (AS SHOWN ON PLANS) PLANTING BED - SOIL PREPARATION PER PLANS & NOTES LAWN OR GROUND COVER FINISH GRADE LANDSCAPE EDGING AND STAKING - BLACK POLY OR VINYL EDGING SUBGRADE - PER PLANS & NOTES LANDSCAPE EDGING DETAIL SCALE: 1" = 1'-0 C.S.A.H. NO. 42 (150TH STREET WEST) (75 Foot Right of Way) 75' Highway Easement (Doc No. 581296, Item 10 Schedule B)20' Storm Sewer Easement(Doc No. 59140, Item 11 Schedule B)XXXXXXXLimited Access Dedication Drainage & Utility Easement Drainage & Utility Easement 151ST STREET WEST (64 Foot Right of Way) GM EXISTING BUILDING FFE = 950.20 17 6 11 188 PROPOSED BUILDING 12,230 SQ. FT. FFE = 950.55 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.8 1.2 1.0 0.7 0.6 0.8 1.1 1.1 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.8 1.7 2.5 2.3 1.5 1.2 1.7 2.5 2.5 1.5 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.6 1.1 1.9 2.5 2.7 3.0 3.4 4.0 4.2 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.6 2.4 1.9 1.3 0.7 0.6 1.1 1.5 2.1 2.5 3.1 3.4 3.6 3.6 3.5 3.3 3.0 2.5 2.4 1.8 1.3 0.9 0.5 0.9 1.4 2.1 2.5 3.1 3.3 3.6 3.9 3.6 3.3 2.9 2.4 2.6 2.0 1.4 1.0 0.5 0.8 1.3 2.0 2.9 3.0 3.0 3.4 3.8 3.5 3.0 2.5 1.9 2.6 2.3 1.7 1.2 0.5 0.7 1.1 2.6 6.6 4.1 2.9 3.2 3.4 3.3 2.7 2.2 1.7 2.8 2.5 2.0 1.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 2.8 2.8 2.3 1.6 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 2.7 3.4 2.7 1.9 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.0 3.4 4.0 3.5 2.5 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.0 4.0 4.8 4.7 3.4 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 5.1 5.9 5.6 4.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 9.5 7.3 5.9 4.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 9.9 7.4 5.9 4.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 5.1 5.9 5.5 4.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 4.1 5.0 4.8 3.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 3.3 3.8 3.6 2.6 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 2.8 3.0 2.6 1.8 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.7 2.6 2.8 2.1 1.4 0.2 0.3 0.3 1.1 2.3 2.3 1.8 1.2 0.3 0.5 0.9 3.3 10.3 4.1 1.7 1.1 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.3 1.8 1.8 1.5 1.0 0.3 0.6 1.5 3.8 4.8 3.3 1.9 1.3 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.4 1.5 1.4 1.2 0.8 0.3 0.7 1.6 3.3 2.5 2.7 2.1 1.4 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 1.2 1.1 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.6 1.1 2.5 2.3 2.3 1.8 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.7 1.6 2.3 2.2 1.8 1.4 1.1 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.4 1.3 2.1 1.7 1.6 1.4 1.3 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.9 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.7 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.0 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 1.0 1.3 1.5 1.6 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.1 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.9 1.3 1.8 2.1 2.3 2.2 2.0 1.7 1.1 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.6 1.0 1.5 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.4 0.9 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.3 1.9 2.6 3.3 3.1 2.2 1.4 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 1.0 1.6 1.4 0.7 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Z D W C D C W WD X X 6"72"78"** LIGHT POLE BASE INSTALLED AND PROVIDED BY ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR 1"Ø CONDUIT (4)-#6 VERT. W/ #4 TIES @12" O.C. 24"Ø CONCRETE PIER FOOTING #4 TIES @ 3" O.C. ALONG LENGTH OF ANCHOR BOLT EMBEDMENT GRADE 3 4" x 10" x 10" STEEL BASE PLATE (4)-3/4" DIA. x 1' - 0" EMBED. F1554 GR.36 GALVANIZED STEEL ANCHOR BOLTS W/ 3" STANDARD HOOK. PROVIDE HEAVY HEX NUTS, WASHERS, LEVELING NUTS, AND NON-SHRINK GROUT. LIGHT POLE WELDED TO BASE PLATE W/ 3/16" FILLET WELDS ALL AROUND 25154 C6 PHOTOMETRIC DATE DESCRIPTION BY PROJECT TITLE SHEET REVISION SCHEDULE PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,FILE LOCATION: S:\PROJECTS\25000 PROJ\25100-25199\25154 UHAUL-APPLE VALLEY MN\25154 CIVIL-SURVEY\CIVIL PRODUCTION DRAWINGS\25154 C6 PHOTOMETRIC.DWG- 21-25154 --/--/-- C6-10 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN C6-10 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN ---- ---- C6-10 MINNESOTAAPPLE VALLEY 0 SCALE IN FEET 20 40 LCH LCH RJA U-HAUL U-BOX LIC. NO.DATE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT DATE: 9/15/2021 5:14 PMRYAN J. ANDERSON XX/XX/21 55938 NOTE: THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN MISINTERPRETATION. LIGHT FIXTURE SCHEDULE SYMBOL LABEL MANUFACTURER/SERIES DESCRIPTION LAMP MOUNTING HEIGHT LAMP LUMENS WATTS REMARKS C LUMARK LIGHTING - CLCS40S CANOPY LIGHT LED 25'-0"13572 90 MOUNT TO BOTTOM SIDE OF CANOPY D LUMARK LIGHTING - XTOR2B DOOR WALL PACK LED 10'-0"2103 18 MOUNT CENTERED ABOVE DOORWAY W MCGRAW EDISON - GAW-SA1B-T3 WALL PACK LED 25'-0"6105 44 X EXISTING LIGHT POLE Z MCGRAW EDISON - GLEON-SA3A-T4FT AREA LIGHT LED 25'-0"14312 96 POLE MOUNTED. MATCH POLE HEIGHT ON EXISTING FIXTURES. ROUND LIGHT POLE BASE NTS TYPE "C" LIGHT TYPE "D" LIGHT TYPE "W" LIGHT TYPE "Z" LIGHT 0 1/2" 1" 2"1/4"PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE CLIENT PROJECT NO. TITLE SHEET PROJECT REVIEWED BY ISG PROJECT # PROJECT INDEX: OWNER:PROJECT ADDRESS: MANAGING OFFICE: THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. DATE LIC. NO. DATE LIC. NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 10/5/2021 4:10:00 PM G1-10 TITLE SHEET, SHEET INDEX, PROJECT GENERAL NOTES 25154 Arch R20 Author Designer MM/DD/YY Checker APPLE VALLEY MINNESOTA 200 25154 G1-10 21-25154 21-25154APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA U-HAUL U-BOX BUILDING NAME ADDRESS APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA ZIPCODE PROJECT MANAGER: NAME EMAIL: EMAIL OWNER NAME CONTACT NAME ADDRESS CITY, STATE (NON-ABBREV.) ZIPCODE PHONE # FAX # U-BOX U-HAUL PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONG1-10 TITLE SHEET, SHEET INDEX, PROJECT GENERAL NOTES PROJECT GENERAL NOTES A. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, WHICH INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO, THE OWNER - CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT, THE PROJECT MANUAL (WHICH INCLUDES GENERAL AND SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS), DRAWINGS OF ALL DISCIPLINES AND ALL ADDENDA, MODIFICATIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS ISSUED BY THE ARCHITECT / ENGINEER. B. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS SHALL BE ISSUED TO ALL SUBCONTRACTORS BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IN COMPLETE SETS IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE THE FULL EXTENT AND COMPLETE COORDINATION OF ALL WORK. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING AND CORRELATING QUANTITIES AND DIMENSIONS. C. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS. NOTIFY ARCHITECT/ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR CONDITIONS REQUIRING INFORMATION OR CLARIFICATION BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. D. FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. NOTIFY ARCHITECT / ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR CONDITIONS REQUIRING INFORMATION OR CLARIFICATION BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. E. DETAILS SHOWN ARE INTENDED TO BE INDICATIVE OF THE PROFILES AND TYPE OF DETAILING REQUIRED THROUGHOUT THE WORK. DETAILS NOT SHOWN ARE SIMILAR IN CHARACTER TO DETAILS SHOWN. WHERE SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS, DETAILS OR DESIGN INTENT CANNOT BE DETERMINED, NOTIFY ARCHITECT / ENGINEER BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. F. ALL MANUFACTURED ARTICLES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE APPLIED, INSTALLED, CONNECTED, ERECTED, CLEANED AND CONDITIONED ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURERS' INSTRUCTIONS. IN CASE OF DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN MANUFACTURERS' INSTRUCTIONS AND THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, NOTIFY ARCHITECT / ENGINEER BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. G. LARGE-SCALE, MORE SPECIFIC DETAILS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SMALLER-SCALE, LESS SPECIFIC DETAILS AND INFORMATION. MORE STRINGENT REQUIREMENTS FOR CODE, PRODUCTS AND INSTALLATION TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER LESS STRINGENT REQUIREMENTS. NOTIFY ARCHITECT/ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR CONDITIONS REQUIRING INFORMATION OR CLARIFICATION BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. H. PROVIDE CONTINUOUS SEALANT AROUND ALL MATERIALS AT ALL INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR WALL PENETRATIONS. REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR APPROPRIATE SEALANT. I. ALL DISSIMILAR METALS SHALL BE EFFECTIVELY ISOLATED FROM EACH OTHER TO AVOID GALVANIC CORROSION. J. SEAL ALL OPENINGS IN WALLS, FLOORS, CEILINGS, AND ROOFS, AROUND DUCTS, PIPES, VENTS, TRAPS, CONDUIT AND ALL OTHER PENETRATIONS WITH FIRE STOPPING AS SPECIFIED AND REQUIRED BY CODES. IF FIRE STOPPING IS NOT REQUIRED AT PENETRATIONS PER CODE, SEAL WITH CONTINUOUS SEALANT. K. PROVIDE TEMPORARY WALLS, ENCLOSURES, DUST SHIELDS AND WALK-OFF MATS AS REQUIRED TO SEPARATE DEMOLITION AND CONSTRUCTION FROM EXISTING BUILDING. L. PROVIDE BRACING AND SHORING AS REQUIRED TO PROTECT EXISTING STRUCTURE TO REMAIN. PROVIDE SECURE AND WEATHERPROOF ENCLOSURE OF TEMPORARY OPENINGS IN EXTERIOR WALLS. PROTECT ALL BUILDING COMPONENTS FROM DAMAGE DURING DEMOLITION AND CONSTRUCTION. M. RESTORE ALL EXISTING AREAS AFFECTED BY DEMOLITION AND RELATED NEW CONSTRUCTION TO THEIR ORIGINAL CONDITION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WALLS, FLOORS, AND CEILINGS AND THEIR ASSOCIATED FINISHES. N. PROVIDE SOLID WALL BACKING WITH METAL OR FIRE-RETARDANT WOOD BLOCKING BEHIND DOOR HARDWARE SUCH AS WALL STOPS, BUMPERS, HOLD OPENS, ETC. AND AT ALL ITEMS REQUIRING FASTENING THROUGH GYP BD. TO BLOCKING O. RENDERED IMAGES MAY NOT BE AN ACCURATE REPRESENTATION OF BUILDING CONDITIONS, REFER TO PLANS AND DETAILS CONTAINED WITHIN FOR SCOPE OF WORK. SHEET INDEX SHEET # SHEET TITLE GENERAL G1-10 TITLE SHEET, SHEET INDEX, PROJECT GENERAL NOTES ARCHITECTURAL A1-21 FIRST FLOOR PLAN A2-11 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 115 EAST HICKORY ST. SUITE 300 MANKATO, MINNESOTA 56001 PHONE: 507.387.6651 FAX: 507.387.3583 MANKATO OFFICE REVISION SCHEDULE DATE DESCRIPTION BY A2-114 A2-11 A2-11 3 2LOADING DOCK EXISTING SELF-STORAGE 1 A3-11 _____________________2 A3-11 _____________________ 11693 SF 100 STORAGE 92' - 8"132' - 8"3 A3-11 _____________________ 3 A3-21 _____________________A1-21 2 64' - 8"4' - 8"3' - 4"100A100B100C 100D W1 ROOF LINE 24' - 0"8' - 8" 4' - 8"3' - 4"2' - 0"12' - 0" AA A.1A.1 BB CC DD EE FF GG 11 22 2.92.9 33 44 4.14.1 55 5.55.5 66 77 2 3 1 102 TOILET WALL LEGEND EXISTING CONSTRUCTION TO REMAIN NEW CONSTRUCTION SHEET NOTES A. ALL INTERIOR PARTITION WALLS SHALL BE WALL TYPE __, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 66 AA A.1A.1 8' - 6"5' - 6"102 TOILET 102 AA A.1A.1 66 5' - 3" N 0 1/2" 1" 2"1/4"PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE CLIENT PROJECT NO. TITLE SHEET PROJECT REVIEWED BY THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. DATE LIC. NO. DATE LIC. NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 10/5/2021 4:09:25 PM A1-21 FIRST FLOOR PLAN 25154 Arch R20 Author Designer MM/DD/YY Checker APPLE VALLEY MINNESOTA 400 25154 A1-21 21-25154 U-BOX U-HAUL PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONA1-21 FIRST FLOOR PLAN 1/8" = 1'-0"1 FIRST FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTE LEGEND 1 OWNER PROVIDED ICE MELT SYSTEM 2 MECHANICAL/ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT BY OTHERS. 3 BUILDING METERS 1/4" = 1'-0"2 ENLARGED PLAN - RESTROOMS REVISION SCHEDULE DATE DESCRIPTION BY FIRST FLOOR 100' -0" T.O. WALL 143' -0" 1 A3-11 _____________________ EF-1 EF-2 EF-3 EF-4 2 A3-11 _____________________ EF-2 T.O. CANOPY 127' -3" T.O. MASONRY 147' -4"BUILDING SIGNAGE EXISTING SELF-STORAGE EF-5 FIRST FLOOR 100' -0" T.O. WALL 143' -0" 3 A3-11 _____________________ EF-1 EF-2 T.O. MASONRY 147' -4" EF-5 FIRST FLOOR 100' -0" T.O. WALL 143' -0" 1 A3-11 _____________________ 2 A3-11 _____________________ 3 A3-21 _____________________ EF-1 EF-4 EF-2 EF-1 EF-2 T.O. CANOPY 127' -3" EXISTING SELF-STORAGE T.O. MASONRY 147' -4"EF-5 8' - 0"16' - 0"68' - 8" FIRST FLOOR 100' -0" T.O. WALL 143' -0" 3 A3-11 _____________________ EF-1 EF-2 EF-4 EF-5 T.O. CANOPY 127' -3" EF-5 SOUTH EXTERIOR FINISH MATERIAL METAL PANEL MASONRY METAL DOORS FINISH AREA FINISH AREA % 3,903 SF 2,388 SF 144 SF 1,371 SF 61 % 4 % 35 % NORTH EXTERIOR FINISH MATERIAL METAL PANEL MASONRY METAL DOORS GLAZING FINISH AREA FINISH AREA % 3,903 SF 2,388 SF 24 SF 192 SF 1,299 SF 61 % ≤1 % 33 % 5 % EAST EXTERIOR FINISH MATERIAL METAL PANEL MASONRY METAL DOORS FINISH AREA FINISH AREA % 5,664 SF 4,081 SF 24 SF 1,559 SF 72 % ≤1 % 27 % WEST EXTERIOR FINISH MATERIAL METAL PANEL MASONRY FINISH AREA FINISH AREA % 5,664 SF 5,048 SF 616 SF 89 % 11 %0 1/2" 1" 2"1/4"PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE CLIENT PROJECT NO. TITLE SHEET PROJECT REVIEWED BY THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. DATE LIC. NO. DATE LIC. NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 10/5/2021 4:09:45 PM A2-11 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 25154 Arch R20 Author Designer MM/DD/YY Checker APPLE VALLEY MINNESOTA 400 25154 A2-11 21-25154 U-BOX U-HAUL PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONA2-11 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 1" = 10'-0"1 NORTH ELEVATION 1" = 10'-0"3 WEST ELEVATION EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE MARK MATERIAL TYPE MANUFACTURER MODEL / SIZE COLOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION COMMENTS EF-1 INSULATED METAL PANEL GREENSPAN 42" WIDE ALMOND VERTICAL EF-2 FULL WYTHE MASONRY MODULAR MATCH EXISTING EF-3 GLAZING DARK BRONZE EF-4 PREFINISHED METAL FIRESTONE BONE WHITE REVISION SCHEDULE DATE DESCRIPTION BY 1" = 10'-0"2 SOUTH ELEVATION 1" = 10'-0"4 EAST ELEVATION Apple Valley Fire Department MEMO City of Apple Valley TO: Alex Sharpe- Planner FROM: Brian Kilmartin, Fire Marshal DATE: April 29, 2021 SUBJECT: U Haul Expansion- 6895 151st Street Alex, I have some questions/ concerns regarding the expansion. - Fire Department Access, the Fire Dept. needs access around the building. In the current status access is at times difficult due to trucks stored in aisle ways. - If a roof is constructed to bridge from the existing building to the new storage location the roof will need to be high enough for fire apparatus to drive through. - This addition will be required to have a Fire Suppression system installed - All turning movements as specified in the current Minnesota State Fire Code (MSFC) will need to be met. Brian Kilmartin Fire Marshal CITY OF MEMO Public Works TO: Alex Sharpe, Planner FROM: Brandon S. Anderson, PE, City Engineer DATE: October 27, 2021 SUBJECT: U-Haul Plan Review per plan submitted 10/05/2021 General 1. All work and infrastructure within public easements or right of way shall be to City standards. 2. Provide a narrative of how the buildings will be constructed and any impacts. The narrative shall include the following: • Shoring (if applicable) • Protection of public utilities within existing drainage and utility easements shall be protected at all times. • Material Storage. • Haul routes to and from the site. • Phasing 3. No construction work shall begin prior to a preconstruction meeting conference with a Public works and a Building Inspections representative. 4. Public Work Department (952-953-2400) shall be notified a minimum of 48 hours for any required water main shut downs and/or connections. 5. City of Apple Valley Water Department shall operate all valves on public owned mains and valves connecting private lines to public owned mains. 6. All retaining walls over 48” from bottom of footing to the top of wall shall be designed and certified by a structural engineer and submitted to building inspections for final approval. Retaining walls over 4’ will require a fence above the wall. Provide additional details and/or specifications for retaining wall. Retaining walls shall be privately owned and maintained. Retaining walls are not allowed in drainage and utility easements without an approved encroachment agreement. Permits 7. Provide a copy of the executed Minnesota Department of Health, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Met Council, Department of Labor and any other required permits prior to construction. 8. A right of way permit will be required for all work within public easements or right of way. 9. A Natural Resource Management Permit (NRMP) will be required prior to any land disturbing activity commences. Site 10. Provide Auto turn drawing utilizing Apple Valley emergency vehicle to ensure adequate emergency and service vehicle circulation to and from the building. 11. All truck deliveries and turning movements shall be accommodated within the site and not use public roadways for internal circulation or operations. 12. Provide Traffic Forecast Information (Anticipated trips and distribution for the proposed land use and existing) for review by City Engineer. Storm Sewer, Grading. Drainage, and Erosion Control 13. Final Grading Plans shall be reviewed and approved by City Engineer. 14. Final Storm water Management Plan shall be reviewed and approved by City Engineer. 15. Final locations and sizes of Storm Sewer shall be reviewed with the final construction plans and approved by City Engineer. 16. Provide updated overall site composite Curve Number (CN) on the plans. 17. Proposed Underground Storm water System shall be privately owned and maintained. An Underground Storm water System Construction and Maintenance Agreement will be required. Sanitary Sewer and Water main 18. The City of Apple Valley has not allowed multiple water services to a single site user. Additional review of proposed water service and additional water meter will be required prior to building permit issuance. • Domestic water and fire service shall be split outside the existing building and the valves shall be located 1.5 times the height of the building away from the building or placed in location readily accessible per City of Apple Valley standard detail plate SER-6. • Private sanitary sewer and water services are shown in the drainage easement along the existing western property line to serve a new bathroom in the proposed building. Additional water service will require additional water meter. This condition needs to be confirmed with building inspections prior to final plans. 19. Show the size of the proposed water service to proposed building. 20. Inside drops are not allowed to public infrastructure. Sanitary service connection shall be with wye and not be connected directly into manhole. 21. Show the location of the existing sanitary sewer and water services. 22. Additional Fire hydrants and access routes shall be provided per the Fire Marshall’s recommendation. 23. Fire protection shall be provided from existing building in accordance with Fire Marshall’s recommendation. Landscape and Natural Resources 24. Quantities and locations of trees should be indicated on plan to show diversity of species. 25. Landscape plan should clearly indicate drainage and utility easements and property line. 26. No major tree plantings shall be located over any underground utilities or in drainage and utility easements. Clusters of trees shall be used near or around these areas instead of planting in a row. The Drainage and Utility Easement will require clearance around the underground utilities, or the expectation that trees may have to be removed for access when needed. I T E M: 5.A. P L A NNI NG C O MMI S S I O N ME E T I NG D AT E:November 3, 2021 S E C T I O N:L and Use / Action I tems Description: Chick-fil-a Canopy Variances - P C21-27-V S taff Contact: K athy Bodmer, A I C P, Planner Department / Division: Community Development Department Applicant: Chick-fil-a I nc. P roject Number: P C21-27-V Applicant Date: 9/20/2021 60 Days: 11/19/2021 120 Days: 1/18/2022 AC T I O N RE Q UE S T E D: City staff reviews variance applications based upon the requirements of State statutes and the City C ode which require that the applicant establish that there are practical difficulties present in order to grant the variance, and that reasonable alternatives are not available. Staff, therefore, finds that the requested setback variances for two canopies on the C hick-fil-a site, 7480 - 153rd St. W., meet the requirement for practical difficulty based on the following findings (1 through 7) and subject to the following conditions (1 through 4). If the Planning Commission concurs, the following motions would be recommended: 1. Recommend approval of a variance reducing the setback for the 1,280 sq. ft. Face to Face canopy from 40' to 10' from 153rd St. W. based on the findings listed below and subject to the conditions listed below. 2. Recommend approval of a variance reducing the setback for the 768 sq. ft. Meal Delivery canopy from 50' to 21' from C edar Ave based on the findings listed below and subject to the conditions listed below. Findings: 1. T he site received building setback variances in 2013 citing the additional right-of-way needed for the C edar Avenue upgrade project; building setbacks reduced from 50’ to 32’ for Cedar Ave setback and reduced from 40’ to 31’ for 153rd Street W. setback. 2. Building location and drive-thru lanes set in 2013 based upon variances granted. 3. Reasonable alternatives are not available. In order to meet setbacks, significant site and building redevelopment would be needed. 4. T he canopies will cover existing impervious surface area. No new impervious will be added. 5. Outdoor staff assisting with the double drive-thru lanes help to improve service times by directing traffic efficiently through the site. 6. Canopies are requested to provide outdoor staff with weather protection by providing shade, fans and heaters. 7. T he site is heavily landscaped. No landscaping is proposed to be removed for the canopy project. Conditions: 1. Lighting of the canopies shall be the minimum needed for safe and efficient operation between pedestrians and motor vehicles. Downcast, shoebox fixtures only. 2. No signage shall be installed on the canopies that is visible from adjacent public streets. 3. A lighting plan shall be submitted which confirms that the additional canopy lighting meets the requirements of §155.353(C) and that no light exceeds 1.0 footcandles at the property line. 4. No existing trees, shrubs or other vegetation shall be removed, except as authorized as part of N RMP. 5. T he design of the canopies shall be consistent with the submitted elevation drawings received in C ity Offices October 19, 2021. S UM M ARY: Chick-fil-a Inc, located at 7480 - 153rd Street West, requests consideration of two setback variances which would allow them to install canopies over two sections of the drive-thru area. 1. Face-to-Face Canopy: T he face-to-face canopy is a roughly 24' x 54' or 1,280 sq. ft. free-standing canopy with 9.5' of clearance covering the double drive-thru east of the ordering boards. T he canopy aligns parallel with 153rd street and is equipped with fans, heaters, and lights to provide weather protection for outdoor staff assisting with taking orders. T he variance requested would be to reduce the setback from 153rd Street from 40' to 10' due to a jog in the right-of-way. Otherwise, the canopy is located 21' from the 153rd Street right-of-way line. 2. Meal Delivery C anopy: T he meal delivery canopy is attached to the west side of the building over the meal delivery window parallel with C edar Ave. T he canopy ranges in width from 8.5' to 10.3' and 84' long, or 768 sq. ft. of area with 9.5' of clearance. T he canopy will be equipped with fans, heaters, and lights to provide weather protection for outdoor staff assisting with meal deliveries. T he variance is requested to reduce the setback from C edar Ave from 50' to 21' due to the jog in the right-of-way. Excluding the corner where the property line jogs due to the entryway feature, the meal delivery canopy would be located 23.5' from the C edar Ave right-of- way line. B AC K G RO UND: Previous variances granted: T he C hick-fil-a building received two variances in 2013 to allow the construction of the building 32' from Cedar Avenue and 31' from 153rd Street. T he resolution approving the variance noted that 20' of C edar Avenue right-of-way and 15' of 153rd Street right-of-way had been acquired by Dakota C ounty for the Cedar Avenue upgrade project. Intersection Landscape Enhancements: As part of the Cedar Avenue upgrade project, Dakota County obtained additional right-of-way at key intersections in order to construct feature entryway monuments with gates, directional maps, benches, decorative concrete, and enhanced landscaping. T he southeast corner of C edar Avenue and 153rd Street is one of the intersections to receive the additional landscape enhancements. Reason for Variance Request: Chick-fil-a states that the variances are requested to help provide weather protection for outdoor employees. T hey find that placing staff outside can help to increase the speed of taking orders and directing traffic. During peak hours, the restaurant uses outdoor staff to increase efficiency through the drive-thru. T he canopies provide weather protection from sun by providing shade, and are also equipped with fans and heaters for additional comfort when needed. T he canopies are not intended to be used for additional signage or enhanced lighting. Definition of "Practical Difficulties": T he applicant proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning provisions of the code; T he plight of the applicant is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the applicant; and T he variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties Factors for Finding a Practical Difficulty: In order to grant a variance, the C ity considers the following factors to determine whether the applicant established that there are practical difficulties in complying with the provision(s) of this C hapter (Chapter 155, Zoning): 1. Special conditions apply to the structure or land in question that are particular to the property and do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district or vicinity in which the land is located; 2. T he granting of the proposed variance will not be contrary to the intent of this chapter; 3. T he special conditions or circumstances do not result from the actions of the owner/applicant; 4. T he granting of the variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate practical difficulties in complying with the zoning provisions of this C ode; and 5. T he variance requested is the minimum variance necessary to alleviate the practical difficulty. Summary of Findings: T he property owner would only be able to meet the setback requirements by significantly reconfiguring the building and the site layout. T he requested canopies are not prominent structures and are expected to be mostly screened from adjacent right-of-way and properties by the existing landscaping. T he canopies will help to provide weather protection for outdoor staff who help to keep the drive-thru operations moving quickly and safely. During C ovid-19, restaurants have become more reliant on drive-thru operations as a means to serve customers safely. T he requested variances are not expected to have any negative impacts on adjacent properties or rights-of-way. B UD G E T I M PAC T: N/A AT TAC HM E NT S : Background Material Memo Map Applicant L etter Plan S et Photo PROJECT REVIEW CHICK-FIL-A CANOPY VARIANCES Existing Conditions Property Location: Southeast corner Cedar Avenue and 153rd Street West (7480 – 153rd Street West) Legal Description: Lot 2, Block 1, CUB FOODS 2ND ADDITION Comprehensive Plan Designation C-Commercial Zoning Classification RB-Retail Business Existing Platting Platted lot of record. Current Land Use Class II (Fast Food) Restaurant with Drive-thru lanes Size: 47,323 sq. ft. (1.09 acres) Topography: Flat Existing Vegetation Urban landscaped commercial property. Other Significant Natural Features None. NORTH Walgreens Development Project Review Comprehensive Plan C-Commercial Zoning/Land Use PD-244, Zone 2 (Retail) EAST Smashburger/Yogurt Labs Comprehensive Plan C-Commercial Zoning/Land Use RB-Retail Business SOUTH Cub Foods Comprehensive Plan C-Commercial Zoning/Land Use RB-Retail Business WEST Cedar Ave, Drainage Pond, Townhouse 4th Addition (with Noise Wall) Comprehensive Plan ROW, Pond, MD-Medium density residential at 6-12 units/acre) Zoning/Land Use ROW, M-6C (Medium density residential, 6-12 units/acre) City of MEMO Building Inspections TO: Kathy Bodmer, Planner FROM: George Dorn, Building Official DATE: October 11, 2021 SUBJECT: Chick-fil-a. 7480 153rd St Canopy  Fire Marshal to review sprinkler coverage for canopies in accordance with NFPA 13.  Structural and Civil plans are required to be signed with the permit application.  Canopies shall be designed and constructed to withstand wind or other latera loads and live loads as required by Chapter 16 with due allowance for shape, open construction and similar features that relieve the pressures or loads. Structural members shall be protected to prevent deterioration  Special inspector agreement required prior to permit issuance for welding and/or bolting of the canopy installation.  Separate permits required for the exterior heaters and fans. CITY OF MEMO Public Works TO: Kathy Bodmer, City Planner FROM: Jodie Schedt, Civil Engineer DATE: Ocotber 20th, 2021 SUBJECT: Chick-Fil-A Canopy Variance Kathy, The Engineering Division has no comments as it relates to the improvements for the referenced project. Apple Valley Fire Department MEMO City of Apple Valley TO: Kathy Bodmer, City Planner FROM: Brian Kilmartn, Fire Marshal DATE: 27th October 2021 SUBJECT: Chick Fil A Kathy, In regard to the purposed canopy’s. The canopy that is purposed to be added to the West side attached to the building will be required to have Fire Sprinklers installed. Brian Kilmartin Fire Marshal SITE Super Target Best Buy Party City Office Max US Post Office Walgreens Panera Smash- burger Chick- fil-a Cub Foods Shady Deals Aldi's Burlington Apple Valley Square Salons by JC Pet Co Whitney Plaza Mattress Firm Wendys 150TH ST W (CSAH 42)CEDAR AVEGARRETT AVE153R D S T W 152ND ST W WHITNEY DR GALLIVANT PLGLEASON PATHGARDENIA AVECEDAR AVE150TH ST W (CSAH 42) 151ST ST W CHICK-FIL-A CANOPY VARIANCES µ LOCATION MAP ^ SITE 8CM- GB RB RB RB GB 244 244 PD- 532 PD- PD- PD-541 PD-739 PD-244 PD-507 PD-244 PD-739 150TH ST W CEDAR AVEGALAXIE AVEGARRETT AVE155TH ST W 153RD ST W 152ND ST W WHITNEY DR151ST ST W F O UNDERSLN GARNET WAY F R O N TA G E R D GLEASON PATHGARDENIA AVE153RD ST WCEDAR AVEGALAXIE AVE150TH ST W 151ST ST W 41 2 1 2 4 4 4 13 3 1 1 3 2 2 22 6 1 7B7A µ CHICK-FIL-A CANOPY VARIANCES ZONING MAP ^ 1 of 2 August 30, 2021 City of Apple Valley Planning & Development Department 7100 147th St. W. Apple Valley, Minn. 55124 (952) 953-2588 Regarding: Justification Letter Chick-Fil-A # 3158 Canopy Program 7480 153rd St. West Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124 Dear Planning Department, Chick-Fil-A would like to submit the following documents as they are seeking approval of a minor site plan amendment and Variance for a canopy addition at their existing site located at 7480 153rd St. West, the southeast corner of Cedar Ave. & 153rd St. The existing parcel is zoned RB, the fast-food restaurant has been in operation for several years, and the parcel is fully developed per the City of Apple Valley and Shopping Center design standards. The 4,559 square foot fast-food restaurant building is located at the northwest corner of the Chick-Fil-A property. Site amenities include, a lighted paved off-street parking field along the east side of the property, screened wall trash enclosure with metal gates, the site is equipped with an existing dual lane drive-thru with an access point located on the east side of the parking lot which tapers to a single lane drive-thru at the pick- up window located on the west side of the building, onsite traffic from this drive-thru lane exits on the east side of the property drive aisle for take-out orders. The existing drive-thru lane and order point menu boards were allowed to be constructed in the drive-thru lane beyond the existing 40’-0” building setback line along 153rd St, and the 30’-0” building setback line along Cedar Ave. Two points of entry serves as the main vehicular access to the site; a shared drive off of Cedar Ave, and a shared drive off of 153rd St. There is no direct access to the Chick-Fil-A site form either street. The subject property is fully landscaped within the interior of the property as well as along both street frontages with mature native shrubs, trees, turf and a decorative 42” high wrought iron screen wall with masonry pilasters. Chick-Fil-A has seen success with this order point menu board canopy and drive-thru lane, and would like to install two canopies in the existing drive thru lane to help enhance their operations further. The Face-to- Face canopy would be 9’-6” tall from bottom of deck to top of conc. pavement and cover an area of 1,280 sq. ft., and is proposed to be located in the drive-thru lane near the existing menu boards. A 54’-0” long section of this canopy would encroach 18’-4” beyond the 40’-0” building setback line along 153rd St., but would remain 21’-0” away from the north property line and be shielded by the existing trees. The Meal Delivery Canopy, a 768 sq. ft. structure, at 9’-6” high from bottom of deck to top of pavement would be installed on the west side of the property near the building at the existing pick-up window. The Meal Delivery Canopy would encroach 6’-6” beyond the existing 30’-0” setback line on the west side of the property for a distance of 84’-0”. This canopy would remain 23’-6” behind the existing west property line. Chick-Fil-A has installed these types of canopies at other locations to help improve the employee environment for their Team Members working outdoors. The Face-to-Face Canopy and Meal Delivery Canopies will allow team members to serve several cars at a time, provide a healthier work environment by protecting the team members from inclement weather conditions and the sun. At other locations the speedier service in the drive-thru has helped with traffic issues during peak hours of operation. 2 of 2 The Face-to-Face canopy will be an open-sided free-standing structure, constructed of steel framing, cantilevered beams with caisson footings. The supporting columns can be left exposed with a powder coat paint finish for a more modern look, or can be framed and wrapped, with finishes matching the existing restaurant building. The Meal Delivery Canopy will be attached to the existing building and the visual goal is to make it appear as a decorative trellis to the existing building. The new canopies will be outfitted with recessed L.E.D. lighting installed within a premanufactured painted metal deck. Fans and heaters are installed to provide relief to the Team Members from inclement weather. The installation of the canopies will not cause an adverse effect on the site, will not emit noise or noxious odors, nor add or alter existing drainage water flow patterns. Existing landscaping will not be affected as no trees or shrubs will need to be removed for the canopy installation, pervious and non-pervious areas will not be altered. With Chick-Fil-A being closed on Sundays, the construction of the canopies is a three-phase process taking less than 3 weeks to complete. In the first week, the footings, and underground conduit are installed, backfill of trenching and patching the pavement occurs, the work takes place starting on Saturday at 9:00 PM and finishes on Monday morning at 6:00 AM. All excess dirt from the footing and trenching is immediately hauled off the site, so no storm water pollution occurs. During the second week, steel is erected, roof decking installed, along with the lights, and fans, in the third week, utility connections are finalized and the C of O is scheduled. Between the construction weekends, during normal hours of operation there is no impact to the site or adjacent properties as the restaurant and drive thru service remain in operation and the construction areas are safely barricaded off protecting the public during the duration of construction. Chick-Fil-A is excited about this opportunity, and is looking forward to working with the City of Apple Valley staff to help achieve their goals. Frank Gawdun, Project Manager Chick-Fil-A, Inc. 480-755-0959 ext. 121 Sheet NumberRevisionsDustin CurtisPrincipal: ----Project Manager:Sheet TitleArchitect8801 N. Central Ave. Suite 101Phoenix, Arizona 85020phone: 1.602.266.2712dustin.curtis@onearchitecture.us----CANOPY PROGRAM7480 153RD STREET WESTAPPLE VALLEY, MN 55124CHICK-FIL-A STORE #3158 Sheet NumberRevisionsDustin CurtisPrincipal: ----Project Manager:Sheet TitleArchitect8801 N. Central Ave. Suite 101Phoenix, Arizona 85020phone: 1.602.266.2712dustin.curtis@onearchitecture.us----CANOPY PROGRAM7480 153RD STREET WESTAPPLE VALLEY, MN 55124CHICK-FIL-A STORE #3158 Sheet NumberRevisionsDustin CurtisPrincipal: ----Project Manager:Sheet TitleArchitect8801 N. Central Ave. Suite 101Phoenix, Arizona 85020phone: 1.602.266.2712dustin.curtis@onearchitecture.us----CANOPY PROGRAM7480 153RD STREET WESTAPPLE VALLEY, MN 55124CHICK-FIL-A STORE #3158 Canopy Examples Freestanding canopy with powder coated posts Canopy with cladded posts to match building exterior materials Canopy Examples Meal delivery canopy attached to building Meal delivery canopy I T E M: 5.B. P L A NNI NG C O MMI S S I O N ME E T I NG D AT E:November 3, 2021 S E C T I O N:L and Use / Action I tems Description: P lanning Commission Animal Ordinance Recommendations S taff Contact: B ruce Nordquist, Community Development Director and A lex Sharpe, Planning and Economic Dev. S pec. Department / Division: Community Development Department AC T I O N RE Q UE S T E D: T he C ommission is asked to consider the following actions related to the draft animal ordinance: 1. Recommend whether the keeping of chickens, last considered in 2014, should be allowed or not. 2. Recommend a minimum side and rear setback of 20 feet for a coop and run, modifying the present 10 foot in the draft ordinance. 3. Recommend a minimum lot size for the draft ordinance: R-1 district and property zoned for agricultural uses only; single family lots at or above 40,000 sq. ft. Within a lot size range yet to be determined with further staff research and analysis and C ommission discussion. Within none of the R-1, R-2, R-3 zoned property as the lot sizes are too small and will affect attached and detached outdoor living spaces on residential lots. S UM M ARY: T he City of Apple Valley amended C hapter 91 of C ity C ode in 2014 to regulate the keeping of a variety of animals. By definition, a farm animal is kept for agricultural purposes. Examples include horses, cattle, goats, pigs, sheep, and bees. Farm poultry is kept for agricultural purposes. Examples include chickens, ducks, geese, turkeys, pigeons and doves. Every year since 2014, staff has been contacted by those wanting the C ity C ode to be amended to allow chickens. To a lessor extent, some residents request a broader change to the C ity C ode to allow bees, pigs and goats. A ll past requests have been denied by staff given the C ode clarity. T hese options are not permitted. In the intervening years, subsequent to the Apple Valley actions, many cities in the seven county Twin C ities area have acted in support of chickens and sometimes bees. T hose wanting chickens have shared that 63 cities support keeping chickens; 57 larger and smaller suburban and suburban edge cities and Minneapolis and St. Paul. T here are 7 locations; Apple Valley, Brooklyn Park, Champlin, Chaska, C ottage Grove, Little Canada and Woodbury that do not allow chickens on residential lots. When the various codes were further studied, restrictions were discovered, for example: Lot size matters: Maple Grove allows chickens on lots larger than an acre. Andover on lots at least 2 1/2 acres. Urban Affairs has deferred lot size to the Planning Commission. Farmington has a rigorous C onditional Use Permit (C UP) process that runs with the land. Our City Attorney advised a permit. Plymouth has a 20 ft. setback, Bloomington has a 30 ft. setback. Urban Affairs discussed 20ft., settled on 10 ft. Arden Hills requires 100% neighbor consent, St. Paul requires 75% support from neighbors within 150 ft. Urban Affairs favored no neighbor approval. Finally, staff analysis of lot size in Apple Valley found that 64% of single family lots were less than 15,000 sq. ft. and clustered together with 1/3, 1/2, and 3/4 acre single lots where subjective resident feedback from those opposed to chickens share a concern that lots are too small. In November 2020, a petition was submitted to the City in support of the keeping of chickens. T he primary location for the gathering of signatures included the weekly St. Paul Growers Association Farmer's Market and Pahl's Market. T he C ity C ouncil directed the Urban Affairs Advisory C ommittee and staff to consider the request. T he petition represents 169 Apple Valley households in support of chickens. T he Urban Affairs Advisory C ommittee has met routinely about once a month since February, 2021. Guiding the evaluation was U of M agriculture extension experts, best practices from other cities, examples of other city ordinances, feedback from residents at public hearings, C ity Attorney feedback and staff research. T he D akota C ounty Tribune has also reported on the process and next steps. On October 26th, the Urban Affairs Advisory C ommittee acted on a motion in support of keeping chickens on all 11,000 single family residential lots by a vote of 5 in favor and 2 opposed. On a 6 in favor to 1 opposed vote, they also recommended that if the keeping of chickens is supported by the C ity Council, that their draft ordinance preparation be the guide to the regulatory aspects of keeping chickens. T he Planning C ommission sought the opportunity in August to address land use related items of lot size and setbacks. A public hearing was held O ctober 20, 2021 where members of the public spoke both in favor, and opposed to the keeping of chickens. Attached to this report are all written correspondence the City has received on chickens this year. T he process has attracted both those in support and those opposed to the keeping of chickens. T he draft Animal Ordinance was prepared by the C ity A ttorney as guided by Urban Affairs and staff if the keeping of chickens is supported. Given that two specific land use related items are included in the draft, lot size and setback considerations, recommendations from the Planning C ommission are sought. T he following represents a summarized representation of multiple messages to Urban Affairs, the Planning C ommission and staff that shares support and opposition to chickens: T hose in support of the keeping of chickens provide the following feedback: 1. Residents want to keep chickens. 2. Chickens are sought as pets. 3. By petition, chickens should be allowed in residential areas and reasonably regulated as to care, sanitation practices, no roosters and like other pet requirements. 4. Chickens should not require neighbor approval as that approval is not required for other pets. (Legal counsel has requested to staff that the ordinance not include an approval requirement from neighbors). 5. Chickens don't smell or make noise. 6. Chickens offer a nurturing environment for special needs children, those seeking to introduce "circle of life" discussion to the family and foster "bonding" experiences for a family. 7. Locally sourced supply of eggs is made possible. 8. Positive community and neighborhood building by allowing chickens. 9. Raising chickens is "not inexpensive" the cost/investment will guide better behaviors and thoughtful keepers. 10. Chickens offer positive environmental impact; insect control and ingesting kitchen scraps. T hose opposed to the keeping of chickens provide the following feedback: 1. Opposed to chickens because agricultural locations have systematically been developed over several years to become more urban, suburban residential areas. 2. According to the Minnesota Board of Animal Health, chickens are livestock, not pets. 3. Residents should not become farmers; raising farm animals in the city. 4. Chicken feces and coops/runs smell. T he odor is not confined to the one property where permitted. 5. Single-family lots are not large enough to accommodate this change. 6. Patios, decks and open windows are enjoyed in the summer and chickens make noise and smell. 7. Grew up in a rural area and moved to Apple Valley because of the suburban amenities I sought. If living next to farm animals was sought, I would have stayed on the farm. 8. Chicken predators include both the wild and domestic; dogs, cats, hawks, fox and coyote. 9. Egg sources already exist in Apple Valley. 10. Chickens are just an initial action to requests for more farm animal and farm poultry choices. 11. Lot size does matter and both larger and smaller lots are grouped together throughout the City and inseparable as a policy. 12. T he decision was made in 2014 that chickens are agricultural animals. B AC K G RO UND: T he following summarizes the ordinance that was recommended by the Urban Affairs Advisory C ommittee on October 26, 2021. Ordinance Summary T he following is a bulleted list of the ordinance provisions for reference. Chickens allowed on all single-family properties. (Further review underway with the Planning C ommission). Roosters and butchering are prohibited. A total of five hens are permitted. 10' side and rear setbacks are required. T he coop must be closer to the subject parcel's home than any neighboring home. A permit is required to keep chickens. T he permit must include a site plan, building materials, and allows for City inspection. T he coop must be constructed of materials of the same standard as other accessory structures and counts towards the total number of accessory structures on the lot. T he coop is required to have a full roof, but the run may be enclosed by chain link or other permitted material. If a permit is revoked by the City C ouncil the applicant cannot reapply for a permit to keep chickens for three years. Coop waste must be disposed of by a licensed trash hauler and shall not be composted on site. Chickens must be kept in the coop/run at all times. C hickens shall not be permitted to roam on the subject property as it negates the setback requirements. In response to concerns about lot size expressed by the Planning C ommission and the public, staff is recommending considering allowing chickens in the R-1 zoning district. T his district has large lots which will mitigate potential impacts. C hickens are currently permitted within the A G "Agricultural" zoning district. T he R-1 district currently allows the keeping of horses in lots larger than 40,000 sq. ft. Allowing chickens within this zone is consistent to unique sized parcels in the City. B UD G E T I M PAC T: N/A AT TAC HM E NT S : Correspondence Map Map Map Exhibit Ordinance 1 Alex Sharpe From:Bruce Nordquist Sent:Friday, October 29, 2021 2:23 PM To:Alex Sharpe; Breanna Vincent Subject:FW: Chickens Please add.  From: >   Sent: Friday, October 29, 2021 1:16 PM  To: Bruce Nordquist <Bruce.Nordquist@applevalleymn.gov>  Subject: Chickens  Please, no chickens! Our neighborhoods look tacky enough with people putting items on the streets to give away. Chickens belong in the country not the suburbs. Thanks. Lynn McClung 1 Alex Sharpe From:Bruce Nordquist Sent:Friday, October 29, 2021 2:25 PM To:Alex Sharpe; Breanna Vincent Subject:FW: Resident Call Concerning Chickens Sorry, use this one  _____________________________________________  From: Kathy Bodmer <Kathy.Bodmer@applevalleymn.gov>   Sent: Friday, October 29, 2021 11:48 AM  To: Bruce Nordquist <Bruce.Nordquist@applevalleymn.gov>; Alex Sharpe <Alex.Sharpe@applevalleymn.gov>  Subject: Resident Call Concerning Chickens  I just took a call from a resident named Bob Schroepfer who lives at 133rd Street Court.  He wanted to express his  concerns about the City potentially allowing the keeping of chickens.  Bob explained he is in his 80s and grew up in a  small farming community in southern Minnesota.  He recalled that the homes in town had chicken coops attached to  their garages in the back alleys.  He said he witnessed the impact from allowing chickens in town including rats, smells,  etc.  He felt it would be a “disaster” if the City were to allow chicken coops on residential properties.  He said he is  concerned about the spread of disease from rodents to chickens, chickens to pets, etc.  He said in Apple Valley, parents can take their children to the MN Zoo or nearby farms if they want to teach their  children where their food comes from.  He thought the keeping of chickens in Apple Valley is a bad idea (a “disaster”).  Kathy  Kathy Bodmer, AICP, Planner  City of Apple Valley  7100 – 147th Street West, Apple Valley, MN  55124  (952)953‐2503  kbodmer@ci.apple‐valley.mn.us 1 Alex Sharpe From:Bruce Nordquist Sent:Friday, October 22, 2021 11:46 AM To:Alex Sharpe Subject:FW: Chickens in Apple Valley From:    Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2021 10:03 PM  To: Bruce Nordquist <Bruce.Nordquist@applevalleymn.gov>  Subject: Chickens in Apple Valley  Dear Mr. Nordquist, I am a resident of Apple Valley living near the intersection of Cedar Avenue and McAndrews. I am writing to urge the City of Apple Valley not to change existing laws to permit the keeping of chickens in residential neighborhoods. Frankly, I can't believe the City is even considering such a change. Apple Valley is not farmland. Permitting the keeping of chickens on residential properties would be a giant step backward for the City. It would make Apple Valley look like a redneck, hillbilly, backward place, not the image we want to project. I fear that chickens in residential areas would also adversely affect housing values. Finally, why is this change even needed? Eggs are readily available at every grocery in town and at very reasonable prices. This is a law that will not meet any existing need and will inevitably create public nuisance problems. Moreover, what will come next--pigs and goats? Please do the right thing and do not allow chickens in the residential areas of Apple Valley. Van Vorhis 2 Alex Sharpe From:Bruce Nordquist Sent:Friday, October 22, 2021 11:45 AM To:Alex Sharpe Subject:FW: Chicken ordinance ‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐  From:   Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2021 8:36 AM  To: Bruce Nordquist <Bruce.Nordquist@applevalleymn.gov>  Subject: Chicken ordinance  Hi Mr. Nordquist,  I was not able to attend the meeting, but I did want my comments to get on the record.  I am totally opposed to allowing residents to keep chickens on their property.  I don’t see the need for it, and I feel it will take our beloved suburb to a lower quality of life, one of living on a farm.   I have also talked to people who do live in areas where chicken are permitted and neighbors who do not have chickens  say it can be smelly, noisy and an eyesore when they have guests in their yards/on their decks.  I do a lot of outdoor  entertaining and this would be intolerable for me.  People also seem to believe that chickens require roosters (which they don’t) and many neighbors add a rooster, even  though not permitted. Inspections would also be necessary to ensure that people comply with every aspect of a chicken  permitting ordinance, such as the number allowable, required living conditions for the chickens, and sanitary regulations  for the properties that have chickens. This would cause extra inspections by city workers, and in my opinion, would incur  a needless expense for homeowners who pay taxes for these services.  I am also someone with allergies, one of which is to feathers.  I am also sensitive to odors.  I would be negatively  affected if our ordinance changes.  If I wanted to live in a farming community, I would move to one.  Please do not change our current ordinance to allow  chickens or any other farm animals.  I love Apple Valley the way it is.  Thank you,  Diane Sterling  3 Alex Sharpe From:Bruce Nordquist Sent:Wednesday, October 6, 2021 5:49 PM To:Alex Sharpe Subject:FW: Back yard chickens ‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐  From:    Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2021 10:52 AM  To: Bruce Nordquist <Bruce.Nordquist@applevalleymn.gov>  Subject: Back yard chickens   Hello Bruce  My name is Liz Paré and I am a resident of Apple Valley with my husband and four children. I saw that you are navigating  the allowance of chickens rule and wanted to address a few things to you.  The first thing I wanted to address was the fact that we the ones who want the chicken would have to potentially ask  permission from our neighbors. This is ridiculous. We do not have to ask permission from our neighbors for anything  else. Getting a dog ‐ nope. Planting anything in our own yard‐ nope. Nothing. So why would we have to with chickens.  Our neighbors could change or have ill feelings towards us and therefore use that for  their decision making.   Second off why would we need a permit for this? We do not need a permit when we have other animals. As long as we  stay in the number the city asks us to. I feel less government control in our personal lives is how our city and county  should be run. Please pass this chicken rule so we can have them. It has been long enough. All the surrounding cities can  have them. You can have a fenced in back yard in burnsville and they can wander in your back yard and then in their  coop at night. Just like a dog. I don’t see the point of passing it if you are only going to make people keep them in coops  the whole time. They are great bug eaters and keep the bugs off gardens. Apple valley has waited long enough. I feel like  each time I watch the meeting it’s just prolonging.... it’s been years ....let’s get this done Thank you  Elizabeth Paré    4 Alex Sharpe From:Bruce Nordquist Sent:Monday, August 30, 2021 10:04 AM To:Alex Sharpe Subject:FW: Feedback on backyard chickens   From:    Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2021 12:28 PM  To: Bruce Nordquist <Bruce.Nordquist@applevalleymn.gov>  Subject: Feedback on backyard chickens  I was unable to attend the public hearing on August 24th and am sending this email to provide feedback on the issue of raising chickens in the backyards of single family homes in Apple Valley. This is not just a discussion of raising chickens in the city; it is a discussion of allowing owners of single family homes in Apple Valley to become farmers raising farm animals in the city. I visited friends in a city allowing chickens, their neighbors were raising chickens. Our friends are enthusiastic gardeners and we were admiring their yard until we got to the middle and were hit with the stench of chicken feces and coop smells. It was disgusting and sad because our friends could no longer enjoy their backyard. The stench was awful, but another aspect of chicken raising is that chickens can fly over fences (they had a 4 foot fence). These chickens would escape and wander through the neighborhood until the owners tracked them down. In the meantime these chickens were in neighbors’ yards and worse, in the streets. Several of the chickens were killed by dogs as they flew into neighbors’ yards. Recently these neighbors moved the chicken coop closer to their house and within a few weeks took the coop down when they found out how terrible the stench was in their house. I read the proposed draft ordinance changes. This is a serious change to the landscape of Apple Valley. I guarantee this change will cause ramifications between chicken owners and their neighbors because single family property is not large enough to accommodate this change in the community. While the changes sound reasonable, you are writing ordinance updates with the expectation that they will be followed. How are you going to monitor that these ordinance updates are followed? Please do not put that responsibility on the neighbors. There would need to be semi- annual inspections to make sure that not only the ordinance is being followed but that the chickens are being treated humanely. If there are any portions of the ordinance not followed there must be a fine assessed. Permits must be required annually and should require a fee for each renewal. Additionally, there must be a requirement for 6 foot fences around the coop or the property to prevent these animals from leaving the owner’s property. I purchased my home in Apple Valley, looking for the perfect location that was not in the downtown area of Minneapolis/St. Paul but in a city with the amenities important to my situation. I am from a farming family and if I had wanted to be living next to farm animals I would have chosen a rural setting. It seems wrong that the “Urban Affairs Committee” would be looking to introduce farm animals into an urban setting. If people want to raise farm animals, they need to move to the country. Please do not allow raising farm animals in single family residential areas in Apple Valley. 5 Thank you for the opportunity to provide my feedback. Deb Schrader 14161 Elmira Ct Apple Valley (resident for 29 years) 6 Alex Sharpe From: Sent:Friday, August 27, 2021 3:53 PM To:Alex Sharpe Subject:Chickens Hi Alex –   I understand you are collecting input on the recent chicken faction uprising.  As a 30 year resident of Apple Valley, I am  surprised it is even being discussed.  It has been quite a while since this was farmland, and that is a good thing for those  seeking a suburban lifestyle.  I have been around chickens and would not want to live next to them.  It is not far to get to  farmland; those who prefer that life can find their way there.  There are some great places for chickens in Apple Valley,  including Buffalo Wild Wings and Wild Bills.  If it’s eggs the folks are looking for, they practically give them away at any of  at least a dozen locations in Apple Valley.  There are a number of improvements to the Apple Valley quality of life that the City should be focusing on, like a stop to  construction of more high density housing and added retail.  Chickens are definitely not the answer.  Thanks for your time!  Enjoy the weekend.  Bill Guenther 13740 Fleetwood Avenue Apple Valley, MN 7 Alex Sharpe From: Sent:Wednesday, August 25, 2021 1:09 PM To:Alex Sharpe Subject:Chicken Ordinance change I would like to record my opposition to changes to permitting chickens housed in residential areas of Apple Valley. Although I understand that this has become popular, I see far more disadvantages for neighborhoods than I can see as justifications. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Merle Lohse 12488 Empress Court 8 Alex Sharpe From: Sent:Wednesday, August 25, 2021 8:14 AM To:Alex Sharpe Cc: Subject:Chickens Hi, We oppose chickens in Apple Valley. Joseph Laura Tramonte 14082 Flintwood Way Apple Valley MN Regards, Joseph Tramonte Have a Great day 9 Alex Sharpe From: Sent:Tuesday, August 24, 2021 2:22 PM To:Alex Sharpe Subject:Chickens I hear you are the chicken guy.  I would like to file my vote to oppose allowing chickens in the city.   I am a resident at 13949 Ember Way.  Thanx  Brian Bone  10 Alex Sharpe From:Bruce Nordquist Sent:Tuesday, August 24, 2021 2:02 PM To:Alex Sharpe Subject:FW: Chickens From: >   Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2021 12:39 PM  To: Bruce Nordquist <Bruce.Nordquist@applevalleymn.gov>  Cc: Tom Melander <Tom.Melander@applevalleymn.gov>; Tom Lovelace <Tom.Lovelace@applevalleymn.gov>  Subject: Chickens  Mr. Nordquist and City Leaders, We oppose chickens at single family residences in Apple Valley. We support the on-going ban on chickens and other farm animals in any residential setting in Apple Valley. We appreciate all the work you do to serve our city. Shirley and Linda Mayan 44 Year Residents of Apple Valley at 180 Garden View Drive. 11 Alex Sharpe From:> Sent:Tuesday, August 24, 2021 1:38 PM To:Alex Sharpe Subject:Chickens Hi Alex, sending this as a resident of Apple Valley. I do NOT support the city allowing chickens in our community. The main reason is the cleanliness and odor associated with them. Another concern is that it would complicate the current traditional suburban neighborhood "animal balance" as I call it. We have a ton of dogs and cats in this community. Adding chickens to this community will inevitable create conflict between dogs and chickens, cats and chickens, residents and chickens, and everything in between. Thanks for taking the time to include my input. Nick Francis Herald Court Resident. 12 Alex Sharpe From: Sent:Tuesday, August 24, 2021 12:08 PM To:Alex Sharpe Subject:Chicken Ordinance - Opposed I am against Apple Valley changing the prohibition against allowing chickens in the city. Thank you Jim Kump 13881 Fleetwood Ave Apple Valley, MN 55124 13 Alex Sharpe From: Sent:Tuesday, August 24, 2021 11:39 AM To:Alex Sharpe Subject:Chickens in Apple Valley My name is Jon Rechtzigel and I reside at 13835 Flagstaff Avenue, Apple Valley.  My phone number is XXXXXXXXXX  I  am opposed to allowing farm animals in the suburb of Apple Valley.  Chickens, smell and can carry/transmit  disease.  Also, eggs are inexpensive in the store.  I understand that some people would be responsible owners but I think the City has to consider the lowest common  denominator of owners and realize the nuisance and detriment to the quality of life of others. Chickens produce a lot of  manure and with it, odors.   Furthermore, it will not end with chickens. Goats, pigs, sheep, turkeys, etc. will follow.   Regards,  Jon Rechtzigel  14 Alex Sharpe From:Bruce Nordquist Sent:Tuesday, August 24, 2021 7:48 AM To:Alex Sharpe Subject:FW: chickens ‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐  From:    Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 4:35 PM  To: Bruce Nordquist <Bruce.Nordquist@applevalleymn.gov>  Subject: chickens  Hello,  Just a note re chickens.  I personally would not want to live next door to someone with chickens, mostly because they  tend to attract mice. In addition, I've never seen an attractive coop.  You asked for opinions and so I'm offering mine.  Thank you,  Michele Hake  15 Alex Sharpe From:Bruce Nordquist Sent:Friday, August 20, 2021 2:53 PM To:Alex Sharpe Subject:FW: Chicken Ordnance From:    Sent: Friday, August 20, 2021 2:49 PM  To: Bruce Nordquist <Bruce.Nordquist@applevalleymn.gov>  Subject: Chicken Ordnance  We have lived in Apple Valley since 1969. This is a very progressive community and have seen many many changes in our time. The thought of having chickens in backyards around us is just another issue to complicate our not so peaceful environment. Already epidemic problems with sound, clutter and barking dogs exist. Throw in aircraft, loud motorcycles, trucks and other loud vehicles racing up and down Cedar Ave and our area is further polluted. Chickens add to potential issues for the city. Count us as dead set against this chicken ordnance no matter how many rules you apply. Approving this ordnance opens the door and it is a certainty that there will be an abundance of noncompliance over time. Thanks for your consideration. Sincerely, Lyle and Judy Arnold 14157 Glazier Ave Apple Valley 16 Alex Sharpe From:Bruce Nordquist Sent:Friday, August 20, 2021 9:16 AM To:Alex Sharpe Subject:FW: Backyard Farm Animals From:    Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2021 5:25 PM  To: Bruce Nordquist <Bruce.Nordquist@applevalleymn.gov>  Subject: Backyard Farm Animals  Please NO. I currently live close to neighbors without a sense of boundaries. I can't imagine them with farm animals! If people want farm animals, they should live in the country where they can have more room. Please do not change the City code to allow chickens, goats and who knows what else. Thanks for asking. Lynn McClung. 17 Alex Sharpe From:Bruce Nordquist Sent:Friday, August 20, 2021 9:15 AM To:Alex Sharpe Subject:FW: From:  Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2021 5:29 PM  To: Bruce Nordquist <Bruce.Nordquist@applevalleymn.gov>  Subject:   NO farm animals in City limits. Rent farm property if they like. 18 Alex Sharpe From:Bruce Nordquist Sent:Thursday, August 19, 2021 12:09 PM To:Alex Sharpe Subject:FW: Backyard chickens ordinance From:    Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2021 10:23 AM  To: Bruce Nordquist <Bruce.Nordquist@applevalleymn.gov>  Subject: Backyard chickens ordinance  Dear Mr. Nordquist,  I am writing to oppose the allowance of backyard chickens in the city of Apple Valley.  I am a firm believer that people, especially those choosing to live in cities in close proximity to others, should live in a  manner that creates no nuisance for others.    Research on this topic will easily yield sufficient reasons that this should not be allowed in a city. First, chickens ARE  noisy. It is a misconception that only roosters create noise pollution—any chicken‐raiser will attest to the “chicken egg  song” (screeching & cackling) that chickens make not only when laying their own eggs but when another does so or the  nest they want is taken. This may seem quaint & endearing to the chicken owner, at least for a time, but to neighbors, it  is a different story. It is bad enough when homeowners have to endure the incessant barking of neighborhood dogs due  to inconsiderate or irresponsible neighbors‐‐ throwing chicken coops to the mix is just foolish. Add roosters to the  equation and the situation becomes ridiculous. (It is very hard to identify the sex of a chicken when young, even to  seasoned chicken farmers, meaning a certain percentage of homeowners who think they’re buying chickens will actually  be buying roosters.)   Over the past decade or so, we’ve all seen and heard about wildlife and nuisance predators becoming increasingly  common in cities. We’ve seen this for ourselves on our own property. When we start adding more animals (like  chickens) to city living that are especially attractive to predators such as coyotes, foxes, badgers, hawks, skunks, mink,  raccoons, and even stray cats & dogs, we compound the problem. It also compounds rodent problems, as rodents are  very attracted to chicken feed and coops.     Anyone who has raised chickens will attest to the fact that they poop often & indiscriminately. Their waste contains  harmful acids, is unhealthy, and isn’t good for plants or suitable for the compost heap. Poop STINKS. Especially in warm  weather. Many people have a hard enough time picking up their domesticated pet waste—how many will responsibly  and regularly pick up chicken poop so the neighborhood doesn’t have to smell it, deal with the flies that are attracted to  it, or deal with the consequences of it being eventually washed into area lakes?    If you’ve ever perused the NextDoor site, you’ll see plenty of angry posts about irresponsible animal owners—everything  from people not picking up their animal’s waste to not caring for them properly to being inconsiderate of the noise  nuisance their animals are creating for neighbors. Now people want to add farm animals to the mix? Just, no. I grew up  on a farm. I moved to the city for a reason. If people want to raise chickens, they can move to the countryside where this  choice will not negatively impact the quality of life of their neighbors. If you want to live in the city in close proximity to  19 thousands of other people, be willing to consider other peoples’ well‐being as highly as your own. I’ve read the draft  ordinance changes that attempt to address some of these issues. But why? It seems like another case of the majority of  citizens having to deal with the unsavory consequences created by a small but vocal group of people who want to have  their cake and eat it too. Even if getting a neighbor’s OK to raise chickens is part of the equation, it doesn’t solve these  issues—people buy and sell, with new people moving into neighborhoods all the time. This ordinance just creates more  potential problems than it’s worth.  Please, we certainly don’t need anything else for people to be upset with one another about. Say no to farm animals in  the city.   Thank you for your time.   Respectfully,   Marcie Greenwaldt, Apple Valley resident  20 Alex Sharpe From:Bruce Nordquist Sent:Monday, August 16, 2021 5:12 PM To:Alex Sharpe Subject:FW: Backyard Chickens From:    Sent: Saturday, August 14, 2021 2:18 PM  To: Bruce Nordquist <Bruce.Nordquist@applevalleymn.gov>  Subject: Backyard Chickens  Hi Bruce,  My wife and I vote no to the proposal to allow chickens in people’s back yards in Apple Valley.  The main  reason is that we chose to live in the city and not out in the country where there is room for farm animals.  A  chicken coop in someone’s back yard would be a pretty ugly site, especially if not well maintained.  We won’t be able to attend the August 24th hearing so am sending this.  Thanks for you consideration.  Tom and Ann Sinkula  13200 Flagstaff Ave.  Apple Valley  21 Alex Sharpe From:Charles Grawe Sent:Monday, August 16, 2021 9:14 AM To:Alex Sharpe Subject:FW: Urban Affairs Attachments:Apple Valley MN Backyard Chickens.pdf   From:    Sent: Friday, August 13, 2021 2:47 PM  To: Charles Grawe <Charles.Grawe@applevalleymn.gov>  Subject: Urban Affairs  Charles, I wanted to attend to Urban Affairs public hearing pertaining to chickens on August 24. I am having outpatient surgery at the Mayo Clinic on this day so I attached a PDF with my comments. I would appreciate it if you would pass it on to their committee. Looking forward to our meeting in September, even if it is just a relatively short meeting. Thank you, Jerry August 13, 2021 Re: Backyard Chickens Apple Valley Urban Affairs Advisory Chair and Committee Members, I grew up in a small town with a population of 900 residents. My parents owned an agricultural business that included commercial chemical and fertilizer applications and sales, bag and bulk livestock feed delivery, dairy intake creamery, large batch egg purchases, egg candling for end use market sales, poultry sales (chicks), and purchasing adult chickens as an intermediary for end use market sales. I worked in this business for 9 years until attending college. I am unable to attend the 6 pm public hearing on Tuesday, August 24th, 2021. These are my thoughts and experiences pertaining to chickens and items that I ask you to consider.  It takes very few chickens (only about 3 to 4) to impact the air quality. Cages must be cleaned of waste and bedding materials and replaced several times per week to avoid incurring an embedded and permeating ammonia waste smell.  If chickens are allowed "free-range" in yards, will fences be required?  Will chicken yard waste removal be required on a regular timeline to prevent air quality and ground water run-off issues? o How will this be regulated?  Since chickens will be caged outdoors, they will draw predators. Expect fox, coyote,, raccoons, mink, ferrets, rats, mice (owls follow rodents) and other animals looking for food. This food includes the chickens, their eggs, and the chicken feed. Most of these animals are nocturnal and chickens will make a lot of loud noise when startled, scared or threatened.  Expect a general increase of the rat and mice population when raising poultry because of the chicken food, eggs and bedding materials. The increase in rodent population will affect neighboring homes.  A minimum lot size required to raise chickens. 1/3 acre or?  Consider the property lines and houses. o Will there be a property line set back requirement to limit the free-range"? o Will you impose a minimum distance of footage spacing (perhaps 20 feet) between houses?  Do not allow roosters. Noise concerns. Thank you, Gerald Brown 12795 Durham Way Apple Valley, MN 55124-8664 APPLE VALLEY AGRICULTURE ZONING DISTRICTS Legend -Zone A-Ag Residen1ial (9) Chickens are currently allowed in the "A" (Agriculture) zoning district. Legend Zone PD Res'l Parcels (2,606) Zone R-CL Parcels (411) Zone R3 Parcels (7,572) Zone R2 Parcels (255) Zone R1 Parcels (167) Zone A-Ag Residential (9) DRAFT ORDINANCE SINGLE FAMILY ZONING DISTRICTS Legend Parcels Over 40,000 (292) Parcels 30,000 to 40,000 (268) Parcels 20000 to 30000 (1,160) Parcels 15000 to 20000 (2,273) Parcels 10000 to 15000 (5,613) Parcels Less 10000 (1,467) INVENTORY OF SINGLE FAMILY LOT AREAS Single-Family Lots By Sq. Ft. Lot Sq. ft. Acre Total Number of Lots Percentage of Total Grouped Lots Less than 10,000 sq. ft. less than .229 1467 12.75% 12.75% 10,000 - 10,999 sq. ft. .23 - .253 744 6.76% 50.99% 11,000 - 11,999 sq. ft. .252 - .275 1709 15.52% 12,000 - 12, 999 sq. ft. .276 - .298 1257 11.42% 13,000 - 13,999 sq. ft. .299 - .321 1021 9.27% 14,000 - 14,999 sq. ft. .322 -.344 882 8.01% 15,000 - 15,999 sq. ft .344 -.367 718 6.52% 20.65% 16,000 - 16,999 sq. ft .368 - .390 525 4.77% 17,000 - 17,999 sq. ft. .390 - .413 380 3.45% 18,000 - 18,999 sq. ft. .414 - .436 357 3.24% 19,000 - 19,999 sq. ft. .437 - .459 293 2.66% 20,000 - 20,999 sq. ft. .460 - .482 239 2.17% 10.54% 21,000 - 21,999 sq. ft. .483 - .505 192 1.74% 22,000 - 22,999 sq. ft. .506 - .527 144 1.31% 23,000 - 23,999 sq. ft. .526 - .550 131 1.19% 24,000 - 24,999 sq. ft. .551 - .574 110 1.00% 25,000 - 25,999 sq. ft. .575 - .597 110 1.00% 26,000- 26,999 sq. ft. .598 - .619 77 0.70% 27,000 - 27,999 sq. ft. .620 - .642 48 0.44% 28,000 - 28,999 sq. ft. .643 - .665 58 0.53% 29,000 - 29,999 sq. ft. .666 - 688 51 0.46% 30,000 - 30,999 sq. ft. .689 - .711 36 0.33% 2.43% 31,000 - 31,999 sq. ft. .712 - .734 33 0.30% 32,000 - 32,999 sq. ft. .735 - .757 38 0.35% 33,000 - 33,999 sq. ft. .758 - .780 28 0.25% 34,000 - 34,999 sq. ft. .781 - .803 24 0.22% 35,000 - 35,999 sq. ft. .804 - .826 23 0.21% 36,000 - 36,999 sq. ft. .827 - .849 22 0.20% 37,000 - 37,999 sq. ft. .850 - .872 23 0.21% 38,000 - 38,999 sq. ft. .873 - .895 13 0.12% 39,000 - 39,999 sq. ft. .896 - .918 28 0.25% 40,000 - 40,999 sq. ft. .919 - .941 13 0.12% 2.64% 41,000 - 41,999 sq. ft. .942 - .964 12 0.11% 42,000 - 42,999 sq. ft. .965 - .987 16 0.15% 43,000 - 43,560 + sq. ft. 1 Acre + 250 2.27% Total 11073 100.00% 100% 1 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY ORDINANCE NO. _________ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA, REVISING CHAPTER 91 OF THE CITY CODE REGULATING ANIMALS BY ESTABLISHING PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS AND REGULATIONS FOR THE KEEPING OF CHICKENS WITHIN THE CITY The City Council of Apple Valley ordains: Section 1. Chapter 91 of the Apple Valley City Code is amended by adding to Section 91.01 the following definitions to be alphabetized with the existing definitions and to read as follows: § 91.01 DEFINITIONS. * * * * CHICK. A chicken between the age of 0 to 4 weeks. CHICKEN. Fowl of the genus Gallus and species Gallus domesticus that is commonly referred to as domesticated fowl. CHICKEN COOP. Any structure used for the housing of chickens. CHICKEN RUN. A outdoor area for the keeping and exercising of chickens. ROOSTER. A male chicken. Section 2. Chapter 91 of the Apple Valley City Code is amended by revising Section 91.06(D)(1) to read as follows: § 91.06 ANIMALS WITHIN CITY LIMITS. * * * * (D) Keeping of certain animals prohibited. (1) Prohibited animals. No person shall keep, maintain or harbor within the city any of the following animals: (a) Any animal or species prohibited by Minnesota or federal law. (b) Farm poultry or farm animal, except in the following cases: 2 1. Farm poultry or farm animals may be kept on property zoned for agricultural uses. 2. Horses may be kept on property zoned R-1 Single Family Residential (minimum lot size of 40,000 sq. ft.). 3. Chickens when kept in compliance with this chapter. Section 3. Chapter 91 of the Apple Valley City Code is amended by adding Section 91.07 to read as follows: § 91.07 KEEPING OF CHICKENS. (A) Chicken permit required. It is unlawful for any person to keep, harbor, maintain, possess, or otherwise control any chicken within the city, except: (1) On property zoned for agricultural uses (A); (2) A chick kept for educational purposes on property zoned for institutional uses (P); or (3) Pursuant to a permit issued by the city under this subdivision on a property zoned R-1, R-2, or R-3, or on a property designated for one family detached dwelling within a planned development. (B) Permit application and fees. An application for a permit hereunder shall be filed with the Community Development Director or his/her designee upon an application form furnished by the city. The permit fee, which shall be paid and filed with the permit application, shall be in an amount established by City Council resolution. A permit issued hereunder shall be for the duration of two years from the date of issuance. The initial permit application shall include, but not be limited to, the following: (1) The full name and address of the following persons: (a) The applicant signed thereto; and (b) The owner(s) of the premises on which chickens are sought to be kept and for which the permit would apply. (2) The street address of the premises on which chickens are sought to be kept. (3) The number of chickens sought to be kept on the premises up to a maximum of five. (4) A detailed sketch plan of the premises on which chickens are sought to be kept. The sketch plan shall include: the location of the residence on the premises; the location of accessory structures on the premises; and the location, dimensions, and design of the chicken coop and chicken run and setbacks to the side and rear property lines. The information regarding 3 the coop and run shall establish compliance with the chicken coop and chicken run specifications provided in this subdivision. (5) A statement certifying whether the property's homeowners' association rules, if any, prohibit the keeping of chickens on the property for which the application is sought. (6) If the applicant is not the fee owner of the premises on which the chickens are sought to be kept and for which the permit would apply, the application shall be signed by all fee owners of the premises. (7) Any other and further information the city deems necessary. (C) Permit renewal application. At least 30 days prior to the expiration of the current permit, the applicant shall file with the Community Development Director or his/her designee on a form prepared by the city an application for permit renewal. There shall not be a fee for a timely filed application for permit renewal. The renewal permit application shall include, but not be limited to, the following: (1) The number of chickens the applicant currently maintains on the property; (2) Confirmation that the chicken coop and chicken run remain in the same location on the premises. If the applicant seeks to move the location of the structure, the applicant shall file an initial permit application and pay the permit fee therefor; and (3) Any other and further information the city deems necessary. (D) Granting or denying issuance of permit. The Community Development Director or his/her designee may grant an initial or renewal permit under this subdivision; however, a permit may not be issued or renewed unless the application filed demonstrates compliance with the requirements of this subdivision. A permit shall not be issued or renewed until the city inspects and approve the premises, including the chicken coop and chicken run, at which chickens are sought to be kept. At the city’s discretion, the inspection may occur through the review of documentation and photos specified by the city. The Community Development Director or his/her designee shall deny a permit hereunder for any of the following reasons: (1) The application is incomplete or contains false, fraudulent or deceptive statements. (2) The applicant does not or has not complied with one or more of the provisions of this subdivision. (3) The premises for which the permit is sought, including, but not limited to, the proposed or existing chicken coop or chicken run, is not in compliance with any provisions of this subdivision, other City Code provisions or state laws relating to zoning, health, fire, building or safety. (4) The proposed chicken coop or chicken run would result in a violation of or be inconsistent with the accessory structure zoning regulations elsewhere in this Code. 4 (5) The applicant or owner of the premises which the permit is to be used has violated this section within the previous three (3) years of the date of the application for permit. (6) The applicant does not own or lease the chickens proposed to be kept on the premises. (7) The applicant is not the occupant of the premises for which the permit is sought to be issued. (E) Conditions of permit. A permit granted under this subdivision shall be subject to the following conditions: (1) Occupancy. The owner of the chickens must occupy the premises for which the permit is issued; (2) Inspection. The premises, including the chicken coop and chicken run thereon, for which a permit is issued shall at all reasonable times be open to inspection by the Community Development Director or his/her designee or any other city official to determine compliance with this subdivision, other City Code provisions and state laws relating to zoning, health, fire, building or safety; (3) Transferability of permit. A permit issued hereunder shall be nontransferable. It is unlawful to keep, harbor, maintain, possess, or otherwise control any chicken on property that is not identified on the permit. (4) Specifications for chicken feed. All feed for the chickens shall be stored in metal, water-tight, vermin-proof containers with properly fitting lids. (5) Specifications of chicken coop and chicken run. A chicken coop and chicken run are required. The construction and location of the chicken coop and chicken run shall be in compliance with the applicable building and zoning regulations of the city and the following requirements: (a) The interior floor space of the chicken coop shall be a minimum size of five square feet for each chicken authorized under the permit. (b) The chicken coop and chicken run shall be professionally constructed or of similar construction standards and materials. The exterior finish materials of the chicken coop shall be: (i) weather-resistant, protective covering material, decay-resistant wood, or if exterior finish wood is not decay resistant, then the wood finish shall be protected from the elements and decay by paint or protective covering (e.g., siding, fascia wrap); and (ii) in accordance with the accessory structure regulations set forth in the zoning regulations in this Code. (c) The construction of and materials used for the chicken coop and chicken run must be adequate to prevent access by rodents. 5 (d) The chicken run shall be attached to the chicken coop. The chicken coop and run shall be deemed as a single accessory structure and subject to the accessory structure regulations set forth in the zoning regulations of this Code. (e) The floor area of the chicken run shall be a minimum size of ten square feet for each chicken authorized under the permit. (f) The total square footage of the chicken coop and chicken run shall not exceed 100 square feet. (g) The chicken run shall be fully enclosed by fencing or other similar material and may include a roof instead of fencing over the top of the run. (h) The chicken coop and chicken run shall be located on the premises in compliance with the following setbacks: (i) at least ten feet from the rear lot line; (ii) at least ten feet from the side lot lines; (iii) the chicken coop and chicken run shall be closer to the residence on the permitted property than an inhabitable building on a neighboring property. (i) The chicken coop and chicken run, or any portion thereof, shall not be located in the front yard, which is defined as any area located between the front lot line and the front setback line or front building line, whichever is further from the front lot line, running from side lot line to side lot line. (j) The chicken coop and chicken run shall be kept in good repair as to be in compliance with the property maintenance regulations elsewhere in this Code. (k) The chicken coop and chicken run shall be kept in a sanitary and odor-free condition, including the regular and frequent removal and proper disposal of any accumulated chicken feces or waste, dirt or filth that could create a safety or health hazard. Composting of chicken feces and waste is prohibited. (l) The chicken coop and chicken run shall be immediately removed when: (i) a permit granted under this subdivision expires or is revoked; or (ii) when the chicken coop and chicken run are no longer used for harboring chickens. (m) Supplying electricity to the chicken coop or chicken run by extension cord is not permitted. A separate electrical permit shall be required to install a supply of electricity to the chicken coop or chicken run. (6) Regulations. The keeping, harboring, maintaining, or possessing of any chicken under a permit issued pursuant to this subdivision shall be in accordance with the following: (a) No more than five chickens shall be kept or harbored on the premises to which the permit applies. (b) Roosters are prohibited. 6 (c) Slaughtering of chickens on any property zoned for residential or institutional use is prohibited. (d) No chickens shall be kept, maintained, housed or permitted inside any residential dwelling or any garage. (e) Chickens shall be kept in the chicken coop or chicken run at all times. When transferring a chicken into or out of the coop or run, the chicken shall be transported in a fully enclosed container such as a cage. (f) Chickens shall not be kept in such a manner as to constitute a public nuisance. Any violation of the provisions of this subdivision shall be deemed a public nuisance. (g) No chicken eggs shall be sold or offered for sale; all chicken eggs shall be for personal use or consumption. (7) Revocation of permit. A violation of any provision of this subdivision or any provisions of the permit issued hereunder shall constitute grounds for revocation of a permit. Section 4. Summary approved. The City Council hereby determines that the text of the summary marked "Official Summary of Ordinance No. _____” a copy of which is attached hereto clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance. The City Council further determines that publication of the title and such summary will clearly inform the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance. Section 5. Filing. A copy of the ordinance shall be filed in the office of the City Clerk. This copy shall be available for inspection by any persons during regular office hours. Section 6. Publication. The City Clerk shall publish the title of this ordinance and the official summary in the official newspaper of the City with notice that a printed copy of the ordinance is available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the Office of the City Clerk. Section 7. Effective date. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and the publication of its title and the official summary. 7 PASSED by the City Council this ____ day of ________, 2021. Clint Hooppaw, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk 8 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY ORDINANCE NO. _____ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA, REVISING CHAPTER 91 OF THE CITY CODE REGULATING ANIMALS BY ESTABLISHING PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS AND REGULATIONS FOR THE KEEPING OF CHICKENS WITHIN THE CITY. The following is the official summary of Ordinance No. ____ passed by the City Council of Apple Valley on _________________, 2021: Chapter 91 of the City Code is revised to add chicken related definitions and to permit the keeping of up to five chickens on property zoned “R-1,” “R-2,” or “R-3,” or on property designated for one family detached dwelling within a planned development, subject to regulations and a two year permit. Chapter 91 of the City Code is amended to permit the keeping of a chick for educational purposes on property zoned “P” for institutional uses. A printed copy of the ordinance is available for inspection by any person during regular office hours in the office of the City Clerk at the Apple Valley Municipal Center, 7100 147th Street W., Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124. I T E M: 6.A. P L A NNI NG C O MMI S S I O N ME E T I NG D AT E:November 3, 2021 S E C T I O N:Other Business Description: Review of Upcoming S chedule and Other Updates S taff Contact: B reanna Vincent, Department Assistant Department / Division: Community Development Department AC T I O N RE Q UE S T E D: N/A S UM M ARY: Next P lanning Commission Meetings: Wednesday, December 1, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. Public hearing applications due by 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday, November 3, 2021. Site plan, variance applications due by 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday, November 17, 2021. Wednesday, December 15, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. Public hearing applications due by 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday, November 17, 2021. Site plan, variance applications due by 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday, December 1, 2021. Next City Council Meetings: T hursday, November 9, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. Tuesday, November 23, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. B AC K G RO UND: N/A B UD G E T I M PAC T: N/A