HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/13/2012 Meeting ...
....
.....
..s.
....
city of App�e
Va��ev
DECEMBER 13, 2012
CITY COUNCIL INFORMAL MEETING TENTATIVE DISCUSSION ITEMS
5:30 P.M.
1. Council Discussion Items. (10 min.)
2. Speed Study for Flagstaff Avenue and 147th Street. (10 min.)
3. 2013 Legislative Policies Review. (25 min.)
4. Solar Grant Opportunity. (10 min.)
5. 2013 Final Budget. (20 min.)
6. Adj ourn.
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING TENTATIVE AGENDA
7:00 P.M.
l. Call to Order and Pledge.
2. Approval of Agenda.
3. Audience - 10 Minutes Total Time Limit - For Items NOT on this Agenda.
4. A�proval of Consent A�enda Items *:
*A. Approve Minutes of November 20, 2012, Regular Meeting.
*B. Set 2013 Council Meeting Schedule.
*C. Approve State Gambling Exempt Permits for Post 1776 American Legion Riders on:
* 1 January 19, 2013.
*2. February 16, 2013.
*3. September 28, 2013.
*4. October 19, 2013.
*5. November 30, 2013.
*D. Approve State Gambling Exempt Permits for Apple Valley Sons of the American Legion,
Squadron 1776:
* 1 February 9, 2013.
*2. April 13, 2013.
* 3 . July 4, 2013 .
*E. Approve State Gambling Exempt Permit for Special Olympics Minnesota on January 12, 2013.
*F. Approve Off-Site State Gambling Exempt Permit for Apple Valley Hockey Association on
January 12, 2013.
* Items marked with an asterisk (*) are considered routine and will be enacted with a single motion, without
discussion, unless a councilmember or citizen requests to have any item separately considered. It will then be
moved to the regular agenda for consideration.
(continued on reverse side)
4. Approval of Consent A�enda Items *- Continued:
*G. Approve Issuance of Various Licenses and Permits for PRG Market, LLC, d/b/a Andy's
Market, at 14113 Galaxie Avenue:
* 1. 2013 Fuel Dispensing Facility Permit.
*2. 2013 Off-Sale 3.2 Malt Liquor License.
*3. 2013 License to Sell Tobacco or Tobacco Products.
*H. Approve Amendment to Precious Metal Dealer License for Bill Buttweiler, LLC, d/b/a Apple
Valley Diamonds, 14810 Granada Avenue.
*I. Approve Issuance of 2013 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor Licenses.
*J. Approve Renewal of Various Licenses and Permits for 2013.
*K. Adopt Resolution Levying 2012 Special Assessment Roll No.615, for $435,254.00 -
Improvements for Eagle Ridge Business Park.
*L. Adopt Resolution Reallocating Special Assessments in Cobblestone Lake Commercial4th
Addition.
*M. Adopt Resolution Approving Reprogramming of Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG) Funds for Glazier Townhomes Rehabilitation Project of $115,000.00.
*N. Approve Lease Agreement with Time Square Shopping Center II, LLP, for Liquor Store No. 1.
*O. Approve Reduction of Various Financial Guarantees.
*P. Adopt Resolution Approving Cub Foods Addition Final Plat and Subdivision Agreement.
*Q. Approve Various Contracts:
* 1. A to Z Home Inspections, LLC, for AV Project 2012-157, Building Inspection Services.
*2. Flanagan Sales, Inc., for AV Project 2013-111, Re-Construction of Quarry Point Shade
Structure.
*3. Midwest Electrical Technologies, Inc., for AV Project 2013-112, 2013-2014 Electrical
Inspection Services.
*4. NAC Mechanical & Electrical Services, Inc., for AV Project 2013-108, Electric Generator
Emissions Improvements.
* 5. Northland Securities, Inc., for Analyzing Tax Increment Assistance Request from IMH.
*R. Approve Acceptance and Final Payment on Various Contracts:
* 1. Ron Kassa Construction, Inc., for AV Project 2012-119, 2012 Concrete Removal and
Replacement Services - $2,698.20.
*2. Flanagan Sales, Inc. for Outdoor Aluminum Bleachers -$52,445.44.
*S. Approve Personnel Report.
5. Re ul� ar A�enda Items:
A. Renewal of 2013 On-Sale Liquor License for Spoon, Inc., d/b/a Spoon:
l. Reconvene Public Hearing.
2. Resolution Regarding Renewal of On-Sale Liquor License.
B. Tax Levy and 2013 City Budget:
1. Hold Public Hearing.
2. Resolution Approving Property Tax Levy and 2013 City Budget.
3. Resolution Setting Water and Sanitary Sewer Rates for 2013.
4. Resolution Transferring $525,000.00 from Liquor Fund to General Fund for 2012.
C. Resolution Appointing Member to Fill Vacancy on Traffic Safety Advisory Committee.
6. Other Staff Items.
7. Council Items and Communications.
8. Calendar of Upcoming Events.
9. Claims and Bills.
10. Adj ourn.
Reminde�: City Offices will be closed December 24 and 25 in observance of Christmas Holiday.
NEXT REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETINGS:
Thursday December 27 7:00 p.m. (Regular)
Tuesday 7�nuary 8 7:00 p.m. (Regular)
Thursday January 24 5:30 p.m. (Informal)
" " 7:00 p.m. (Regular)
Regular meetings are broadcast, live, on Charter Communications Cable Channel 16.
(Agendas and meeting minutes are also available on the City's Internet Web Site
www. cityofapplevalley. or�
City of
UPDATE OF CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING ACTIONS
DECEMBER 13, 2012
3. Audience - For Items NOT on this Agenda - Ms. Coleen Rowley, 193 Beaumont Ct., requested the
City Council discuss military funding at a future meeting and adopt a resolution supporting the
reduction of military spending.
Minnesota House Representative-Elect Anna Wills commented on the State’s budget and stated she
is interested in hearing about any concerns Apple Valley is facing.
4. Approved All Consent Agenda Items *:
*A. Approve Minutes of November 20, 2012, Regular Meeting.
*B. Set 2013 Council Meeting Schedule.
*C. Approve State Gambling Exempt Permits for Post 1776 American Legion Riders on:
*1 January 19, 2013.
*2. February 16, 2013.
*3. September 28, 2013.
*4. October 19, 2013.
*5. November 30, 2013.
*D. Approve State Gambling Exempt Permits for Apple Valley Sons of the American Legion,
Squadron 1776:
*1 February 9, 2013.
*2. April 13, 2013.
*3. July 4, 2013.
*E. Approve State Gambling Exempt Permit for Special Olympics Minnesota on January 12, 2013.
*F. Approve Off-Site State Gambling Exempt Permit for Apple Valley Hockey Association on
January 12, 2013.
*G. Approve Issuance of Various Licenses and Permits for PRG Market, LLC, d/b/a Andy’s
Market, at 14113 Galaxie Avenue:
*1. 2013 Fuel Dispensing Facility Permit.
*2. 2013 Off-Sale 3.2 Malt Liquor License.
*3. 2013 License to Sell Tobacco or Tobacco Products.
*H. Approve Amendment to Precious Metal Dealer License for Bill Buttweiler, LLC, d/b/a Apple
Valley Diamonds, 14810 Granada Avenue.
*I. Approve Issuance of 2013 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor Licenses.
*J. Approve Renewal of Various Licenses and Permits for 2013.
* Items marked with an asterisk (*) are considered routine and will be enacted with a single motion, without
discussion, unless a councilmember or citizen requests to have any item separately considered. It will then be
moved to the regular agenda for consideration.
(continued on reverse side)
4. Approved All Consent Agenda Items * - Continued:
*K. Adopt Resolution Levying 2012 Special Assessment Roll No. 615, for $435,254.00 -
Improvements for Eagle Ridge Business Park.
*L. Adopt Resolution Reallocating Special Assessments in Cobblestone Lake Commercial 4th
Addition.
*M. Adopt Resolution Approving Reprogramming of Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG) Funds for Glazier Townhomes Rehabilitation Project of $115,000.00.
*N. Approve Lease Agreement with Time Square Shopping Center II, LLP, for Liquor Store No. 1.
*O. Approve Reduction of Various Financial Guarantees.
*P. Adopt Resolution Approving Cub Foods Addition Final Plat and Subdivision Agreement.
*Q. Approve Various Contracts:
*1. A to Z Home Inspections, LLC, for AV Project 2012-157, Building Inspection Services.
*2. Flanagan Sales, Inc., for AV Project 2013-111, Re-Construction of Quarry Point Shade
Structure.
*3. Midwest Electrical Technologies, Inc., for AV Project 2013-112, 2013-2014 Electrical
Inspection Services.
*4. NAC Mechanical & Electrical Services, Inc., for AV Project 2013-108, Electric Generator
Emissions Improvements.
*5. Northland Securities, Inc., for Analyzing Tax Increment Assistance Request from IMH.
*R. Approve Acceptance and Final Payment on Various Contracts:
*1. Ron Kassa Construction, Inc., for AV Project 2012-119, 2012 Concrete Removal and
Replacement Services - $2,698.20.
*2. Flanagan Sales, Inc. for Outdoor Aluminum Bleachers - $52,445.44.
*S. Approve Personnel Report.
5. Regular Agenda Items:
A. Renewal of 2013 On-Sale Liquor License for Spoon, Inc., d/b/a Spoon:
1. Reconvened Public Hearing.
2. Adopted Resolution Renewing On-Sale Liquor License through January 31, 2013.
B. Tax Levy and 2013 City Budget:
1. Held Public Hearing.
2. Adopted Resolution Approving Property Tax Levy and 2013 City Budget.
3. Adopted Resolution Setting Water and Sanitary Sewer Rates for 2013.
4. Adopted Resolution Transferring $525,000.00 from Liquor Fund to General Fund for
2012.
C. Adopted Resolution Appointing Laura Turek to Fill Vacancy on Traffic Safety Advisory
Committee with Term Expiring March, 1, 2015.
6. Other Staff Items.
7. Council Items and Communications.
8. Approved Calendar of Upcoming Events.
9. Approved Claims and Bills.
Reminder: City Offices will be closed December 24 and 25 in observance of Christmas Holiday.
NEXT REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETINGS:
Thursday December 27 7:00 p.m. (Regular)
Tuesday January 8 7:00 p.m. (Regular)
Thursday January 24 5:30 p.m. (Informal)
“ “ 7:00 p.m. (Regular)
Regular meetings are broadcast, live, on Charter Communications Cable Channel 16.
(Agendas and meeting minutes are also available on the City’s Internet Web Site
www.cityofapplevalley.org)
��'�- t
r– �---�
� . --- ' -----�
New ° - �
Hope � � –.� � —'
� � � _J
� �, � � i Lirrle ��-
Q I I Canada
Roseville � i
_--- _-.--�� �— � ; �_.—.� �
� -----� �
Golden I _�_. — — -- --_„�
Valley --• ---
� ► j C I
i � ,
� � f �'_'�
Minnea olis � �
� p � �
i
i Sr. Louis !`` St. I
� Park � Paul �
� _ �
� �
� � �------� � T "_=' `
� � : !
I �• t�,, WeStSt. � �1 !
.�x --.�. � � Paul � ��.,\, �
`� � •....,
Edina � � �� J` ���....1.
� I ,r o �
i � ' 1„�.� Mendota ,�,�_ �o ��`� �
,, � --�-- ti o� �
Richfield ,� Heights � � �
� i' Sunfish �
, , � ; �' Lake
,�------- ---- - -------__-------------.._.__� `� '
j L�
f ,
� ~` Inver
Bloomingron %
Grove
Eagan Heights
,--�
Burnsville
Savage
App�e Legend
valley NOC Designated Communities
� "` ` NOC At Large Communities
"+� MSP Noise Oversight Committee Representation
�+ +
,., f
0 1.5 3 6
L i i � I � � i I
dms20t 212 t 1 MIIEs
:::. Zh1F
.....
....
City of App�e
Va��ey MEMO
Public Works Department
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator
FROM: Todd Blomstrom, Public Works Director
DATE: December 10, 2012
SUBJECT: SPEED STUDY FOR FLAGSTAFF AVNEUE AND 147TH STREET
The City of Apple Valley recently completed two street construction projects to expand the
City's collector street system: the extension of 147th Street from Flagstaff Avenue to Johnny
Cake Ridge Road, and the extension of Flagstaff Avenue from 140th Street to 147th Street. One
of the final remaining items for both projects is to consider potential modifications to the posted
speed limits. The following speed limits are currently posted along both roadways.
Fla staff Avenue 147th Street
Posted Posted
From To S eed Limit From To Speed Limit
160th Street 150th Street . 40 m�h _ Cedar Ave Galaxie Ave 30 mph
........................... ................. ....................... .... ..._ _._.... _.....................................__. _.... ......... . _..__._.................................... ..... .................... _...........
1 SOth Street 147th Street 30 mph _ Galaxie Ave _ Fla�staff Ave _ 30 m�h
................................................................... .... _.._..
_147th Street East View HS 35 mph........._..... _Flagstaff Ave..........__.._JCRR._._._ ............................ ................._35_m�h.._..............
East View HS 140th Street 30 mph JCRR Pilot Knob Rd 30 mph
Minnesota Statutes 169.14 outlines the process for modification of speed limits in excess of 30
mph. If the City wishes to establish speed limits in excess of 30 mph for these roadway
segments, the City should provide a request to the Commissioner of Transportation to perform an
engineering study to determine the appropriate speed limit. If a study is conducted, the
Department of Transportation may determine that the speed limits within the study area be
lowered, remain the same, or increased based on study criteria.
City staff will be available at the City Council Informal Session on December 13, 2012, to
review the existing posted speed limits along Flagstaff Avenue and 147th Street and determine if
the City Council wishes to request a speed study by the Deparhnent of Transportation for these
roadway segments.
TAB:jcb
, � N �- �.
12/13/2012
.
SPEED LIMITS
FLAGSTAFF AVENUE AND 147T" STREET
December 13, 2012
'�'
�ade�
•
Establishing Posted Speed Limits Establishing "Urban District" (30 mph)
(Ref Minnesota Statutes 169.14, Su6d. 5) Ref. 169.14, Subd. Sb. and 169.11, Subd. 90
When local authorities believe that the existing speed limit upon any street or Road segment of at least a quarter-mile in distance of any ciry street,
highway, or part thereof, within their respecrive jurisdictions and not a part of municipal state-aid street, or town road meets the definition of "urban
� ihe Wnk highway system is greate�� or less than is reasonable or safe under districP' as defined in sec[ion 169.011, subdivision 90
existing conditions,
The goceming body of the ciTy or town may by resolution deciare the
They may request the commissioner to authorize, upon tl�e basis of an segment to be an urban district and may establish on the segment the
engineering �and traffic investigation, the erection of appropriate signs speed 1'vnit fot urban districts. .
designating what speed is reasonable and safe, ...
"Urban dishict" means the territory contiguous to and including any city
street or town road that is built up with structures devoted to business,
indush}; or dwelling houses situated at intervals of less than ] 00 feet for
a distance of a quarter of a mile or more.
FLAGSfqFFAVENUEAN0147rNSTREET � FLAGSfAFFAVENUEAND147TM5TREET �
•
1
12/13/2012
�
Segments for Study
Determine which mad segments to include in City Coimcil
Resolution requesting an engineering (speed) study:
• 147th Street from Galaxie to Flagstaff
• 147'" Street from Flagstaff to Johnny Cake Ridge Road
� Flagstaff Avenue frmn CR 42 to 147�' Street
� FlagstaffAvenue from 149'" Street to 140"' Street
FLAGSTAFFAVENUEAND 147 �„�y�
�wM
�
QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS
FLAGSfAFFAVENUEAND 147T� SfREET �y
"�Y
i
z
T-N�-3
��� 'REPLAGE
��►�.
�����
����
�«�.
City of App�e
Va��ey MEMO
Administration
TO: Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Tom Lawell, City AdministratAr
�
DATE: December 12, 2012
SUBJECT: Legislative Policies for 2013 Session
The Minnesota Legislature will convene again at noon on Tuesday, January 8,
2013. Typically we spend some time late in the year discussing various legislative
policies of interest to our City in preparation for the legislative session.
Over the past few months various municipal groups have been working to develop
their respective legislative priorities. Many of you served on various policy
committees for the League of Minnesota Cities, Metro Cities, or the Municipal
Legislative Commission.
In preparation for the discussion, attached please find the 2013 legislative policies
developed by the League of Minnesota Cities (yellow paper) and Metro Cities (blue
paper). The 2013 legislative policies for the Municipal Legislative Commission have
not yet been finalized, but are expected in the coming week. A near-final draft copy
is attached (green paper).
In addition to the policies developed by these three municipal organizations, we may
also have another legislative policy to advance this year related to the use of tax
increment financing and the redevelopment of the active sand and gravel mining
area south of County Road 42. Staff worked with the land owner last year and we
were successful in getting the legislation approved by the House and Senate as part
of the Omnibus Tax Bill. As you know, the bill was unfortunately vetoed by the
Governor. We should discuss whether we want to again pursue this bill during the
upcoming legislative session.
Council is being asked to review the attached policies and provide direction to staff
as to your 2013 legislative priorities. We should also discuss if we'd like to invite
members our legislative delegation to the upcoming January 24 informal City
Council meeting.
Should you have questions regarding the policies, please let me know.
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES
2013
. . .
For Legislative and
Administrative Actian
Adopted November 8, 2�12
The only co�npyehensive statewide advacacy agenda
fo� all Minnesota cities
� �
j EAGUE oF
MINNESOTA
�ITIES
Zhis docunaent is availuble in the Legislatiue Action Center•
on the League's website at www.lmc.or�/palicies
Copyright OO 2012 League of Minnesota Cities.
All rights reserved.
! �.
� League of Minnesota Cities
145 Universiri' Avenue �XTest • St. Paul, MN 57103-2044
� L,EAGUE oF (�5i} 2si-i2oo • {goo) �25-1i22 • F�: (�51> 2sr-12��
MIN N ESOTA TDD: ��sl> ?sl-i?�o • www.Imc.or�
CITI ES
-
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES LEGISLATIVE STAFF ............. vi
2012 LEGISLATIVE POLICY COMMITTEE MEMBERS ................. vii
Improving Service Delivery .............................................................................................................. vii
Improving Local Economies ............................................................................................................. vii
Human Resources & Data Practices .................................................................................................. vii
...
Improving Fiscal Futures .................................................................................................................. viii
LMC POLICY DEVELOPMENT PROCESS .......................................... ix
GENERAL POLICY STATEMENT ...........................................................x
STATEMENT OF INTENT ..........................................................................x
IMPROVING SERVICE DELIVERY .........................................................1
SD- 1. Unfunded Mandates ................................................................................................................. 1
SD- 2. Local Approval of Special Laws .............................................................................................. 1
SD- 3. Redesigning and Reinventing Government ............................................................................. 1
SD- 4. State Government Shutdowns .................................................................................................. 2
SD- 5. City Costs for Enforcing State and Local Laws ....................................................................... 3
SD- 6. Duration of Conservation Easements ....................................................................................... 4
SD- 7. Responsibility for Locating Private Underground Facilities ................................................... 4
SD- 8. Utility Relocation Under Design-Build Road Construction .................................................... 5
SD- 9. National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standards ........................................................ 6
SD- 10. Fire Mutual Aid ...................................................................................................................... 6
SD- 11. Clarification of Joint Powers Relationships with Federally Recognized Indian Tribes ........ 7
SD- 12. Ambulance Service Costs and Liability ................................................................................. 7
SD- 13. Fees for Service ...................................................................................................................... 8
SD- 14. Providing Information to Citizens ......................................................................................... 9
SD- 15. Special Assessment Procedure ............................................................................................. 10
SD- 16. Administrative Fines for Code Violations ........................................................................... 10
SD- 17. Contracting and Purchasing ................................................................................................. 10
SD- 18. Modernizing Bid Publication Requirements ........................................................................ 11
SD- 19. City Enterprise Operations ................................................................................................... 11
SD- 20. Initiative and Referendum .................................................................................................... 12
SD- 21. Civil Liability of Local Governments .................................................................................. 12
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page i
SD- 22. Private Property Rights and Takings ................................................................................... 13
SD- 23. Organized Solid Waste Collection ....................................................................................... 14
SD- 24. Private Well Drilling ............................................................................................................ 15
SD- 25. Airport Safety Zones ............................................................................................................ 16
SD- 26. Sustainable Development ..................................................................................................... 16
SD- 27. Construction Codes .............................................................................................................. 18
SD- 28. Residential Sprinkler Requirements .................................................................................... 19
SD- 29. City Rental Housing Licensing ............................................................................................ 20
SD- 30. Disability Access Requirements .......................................................................................... 20
SD- 31. Restrictions on Possession of Firearms ................................................................................ 21
SD- 32. Creating a Minnesota GIS .................................................................................................... 21
SD- 33. Public Safety Communications ............................................................................................ 22
SD- 34. CriMNet ............................................................................................................................... 22
SD- 35. Pawn Shop Regulation and Use of the Automated Pawn System (APS) ........................... 23
SD- 36. Compensation and Reimbursement for Public Safety Services ........................................... 24
SD- 37. Administrative Traffic Citations .......................................................................................... 25
SD- 38. Juveniles in Municipal Jails ................................................................................................. 26
SD- 39. Justice System Funding ....................................................................:................................... 26
SD- 40. Homeland Security Costs and Liability ............................................................................... 27
SD- 41. Immigration Reform ............................................................................................................ 28
SD- 42. Racial Profiling .................................................................................................................... 28
SD- 43. Legalization of Fireworks .................................................................................................... 29
SD- 44. Traffic Enforcement Cameras .............................................................................................. 29
SD- 45. Operation of Motorized Foot Scooters ................................................................................ 30
SD- 46. Methamphetamine ................................................................................................................ 30
SD- 47. Drug Paraphernalia .............................................................................................................. 31
SD- 48. Regulation of Massage Therapists ....................................................................................... 31
SD- 49. Lawful Gambling and Local Control ................................................................................... 32
SD- 50. Liquor Liability Insurance Limits ........................................................................................ 32
SD- 51. On-Sale Liquor or Wine Licenses to Cultural Centers ........................................................ 33
SD- 52. Wine and Off-Sale Licenses ................................................................................................ 33
SD- 53. Conditions for Liquor Licenses ........................................................................................... 33
SD- 54. Youth Access to Alcohol and Tobacco ................................................................................ 34
SD- 55. Smoking Ban Ordinances .................................................................................................... 34
SD- 56. Environmental Protection .................................................................................................... 34
SD- 57. Impaired Waters ................................................................................................................... 36
SD- 58. Phosphorus Reduction ......................................................................................................... 37
SD- 59. Urban Forest Management Funding .................................................................................... 38
SD- 60. Election Issues ..................................................................................................................... 38
SD- 61. Absentee Voting ................................................................................................................... 39
SD- 62. Early Voting ......................................................................................................................... 39
SD- 63. Ranked Choice Voting Issues .............................................................................................. 40
SD- 64. Write-in Candidates in City Elections ................................................................................. 40
SD- 65. Felon Status for Voter Eligibility ......................................................................................... 40
SD- 66. Charter Authority to Establish Commencement and Expiration of Terms of City
ElectedOfficials ................................................................................................................... 41
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page ii
SD- 67. Library Funding ................................................................................................................... 41
SD- 68. Park and Library Land Tax Break ....................................................................................... 42
SD- 69. Charter Law Expense Limit Increase ................................................................................... 42
IMPROVING LOCAL ECONOMIES ......................................................43
LE- 1. Growth Management and Annexation ................................................................................... 43
LE- 2. Wildlife Management Areas .................................................................................................. 44
LE- 3. Official State Mapping Responsibility ................................................................................... 45
LE- 4. Electric Service Extension ................................................:.................................................... 45
LE- 5. Statutory Approval Timelines ................................................................................................ 45
LE- 6. Public Infrastructure Utilities ................................................................................................. 46
LE- 7. Development Disputes ........................................................................................................... 47
LE- 8. Foreclosure and Neighborhood Recovery .............................................................................. 47
LE- 9. New Resources for Affordable Housing ................................................................................ 48
LE- 10. Energy Efficiency Improvement Requirements for Housing ............................................... 49
LE- ll. Residential Care Facilities and Post-Incarceration Living Facilities (group homes)........... 50
LE- 12. Inclusionary Housing ........................................................................................................... 50
LE- 13. Community Land Trusts ...................................................................................................... 51
LE- 14. State Broadband Policy Priorities for Cities ........................................................................ 51
LE- 15. Competitive Cable Franchising Authority ........................................................................... 52
LE- 16. Right-of-Way Management ................................................................................................. 53
LE- 17. Wireless Tower and Antenna Siting .................................................................................... 55
LE- 18. Economic Development Authorities .................................................................................... 55
LE- 19. Workforce Readiness ........................................................................................................... 56
LE- 20. Community Reinvestment Partnerships and Financing ....................................................... 56
LE- 21. Tax Increment Financing (TIF) ............................................................................................ 57
LE- 22. TIF District Deficits ............................................................................................................. 58
LE- 23. Transit Improvement Areas .................................................................................................. 58
LE- 24. Business Subsidies ............................................................................................................... 59
LE- 25. Business Development Programs ......................................................................................... 59
LE- 26. Land Recycling Programs .................................................................................................... 60
LE- 27. Property Tax Abatement Authority ...................................................................................... 61
LE- 28. OSA Response Timelines .................................................................................................... 61
LE- 29. OSA Time Limitations ......................................................................................................... 62
LE- 30. Adequate Funding for Transportation .................................................................................. 62
LE- 31. Truck Weight Restrictions on Interstate Highways and Freeways ...................................... 63
LE- 32. Turnbacks of County and State Roads ................................................................................. 64
LE- 33. MnDOT Rights-of-Way Maintenance ................................................................................. 64
LE- 34. Road and Transit Funding for Cities Under 5,000 ............................................................... 64
LE- 35. Complete Streets .................................................................................................................. 65
LE- 36. Railroads .............................................................................................................................. 65
LE- 37. Airport Planning and Funding .............................................................................................. 66
HUMAN RESOURCES & DATA PRACTICES ......................................68
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page iii
HumanResources .........................................................................................68
HR- 1. Personnel Mandates and Limits on Local Control ................................................................ 68
HR- 2. Firefighter and Ambulance Payroll ....................................................................................... 68
HR- 3. Pay Equity Compliance .. ...................... ........ .. . ...... ... ........ ... .... 69
HR- 4. Public Employment Labor Relations Act (PELRA) ... ...:..... ......... .................... .............: 69
HR- 5. Payment of Arbitration Fees .................................................................................. .............. 70
HR - 6. Essential Employees .............................................................................................................. 70
HR - 7. Re-employment Benefits ....................................................................................................... 71
HR- 8. Pension Benefits .................................................................................................................... 71
HR- 9. Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) .............................................................. 71
HR- 10. Volunteer Firefighter Pension Benefits ............................................................................... 73
HR- 1 l. Retirement Work Incentives ................................................................................................ 74
HR- 12. Part-Time Peace Officer Licenses ....................................................................................... 74
HR- 13. State Paid Police and Fire Medical Insurance ..................................................................... 75
HR- 14. Health Care Insurance Programs ......................................................................................... 76
HR- 15. Workers' Compensation ...................................................................................................... 77
HR - 16. Breathalyzers ....................................................................................................................... 78
HR- 17. Veterans Preference ............................................................................................................. 78
HR- 18. Drug and Alcohol Rehabilitation ......................................................................................... 79
HR- 19. Background Checks ............................................................................................................. 79
DataPractices ...............................................................................................80
DP- 1. Data Practices Compliance Issues ......................................................................................... 80
DP- 2. Data Requests for Citizen Contact Information ..................................................................... 81
DP- 3. Maintaining Government Data in Large Databases ...........................................
.................... 81
DP- 4. Sharing of Student Data with Local Law Enforcement in Emergencies ............................... 82
DP- 5. Disclosure of Victim Data .................................................................................................... 82
DP- 6. Open Meeting Law ................................................................................................................ 83
FederalEmployment Law ...........................................................................84
FED- 1. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA) ........................................... 84
FED- 2. Medicare/Medicaid Premium Disbursements ..................................................................... 84
FED- 3. Flexible Spending Accounts ................................................................................................ 84
FED- 4. Reserve Income Replacement Program (RIRP) .................................................................. 84
FED- 5. IRS Regulations on Death Benefits ..................................................................................... 85
FED- 6. Federal Public Safety Collective Bargaining Bill ............................................................... 85
IMPROVING FISCAL FUTURES ............................................................86
FF- 1. State-Local Fiscal Relations ................................................................................................... 86
FF- 2. Economic Contributions by Cities .......................................................................................... 87
FF- 3. State Budget Stability ............................................................................................................. 87
FF- 4. Funding Local Government Aid ............................................................................................. 88
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page iv
. ._
FF- 5. Local Government Aid Reform .............................................................................................. 88
FF- 6. State Charges for Administrative Services ............................................................................. 89
FF- 7. Reporting Requirements ......................................................................................................... 89
FF- 8. Direct Property Tax Relief Programs ..................................................................................... 90
FF- 9. Sales Tax on Local Government Purchases ........................................................................... 91
FF- 10. Sales Tax on Capital Equipment .......................................................................................... 91
FF- 11. Taxation of Electronic Commerce ........................................................................................ 91
FF- 12. Online Travel Companies and Local Hotel Occupancy Taxes ............................................. 92
FF- 13. Taxation of Electric Generation Personal Property .............................................................. 92
FF- 14. Taxation of Municipal Bond Interest .................................................................................... 93
FF- 15. Pollution Control Exemption ................................................................................................ 93
FF- 16. State Support for Municipal Energy Policy Goals ......................................:........................ 93
FF- 17. State Restrictions on Local Budgets ..................................................................................... 94
FF- 18. Tax Hearing and Notification Process .................................................................................. 95
FF- 19. City Fund Balances ............................................................................................................... 95
FF- 20. City Revenue Diversification ............................................................................................... 96
FF- 21. Local Option Sales T� ........................................................................................................ 96
FF- 22. City Franchise Authority ...................................................................................................... 97
FF- 23. Utility Valuation Transition Aid ........................................................................................... 98
FF- 24. Payments for Services to Tax-Exempt Property ................................................................... 98
FF- 25. Fire Service Taxing Districts ................................................................................................ 98
FF- 26. Housing Improvement Areas ...........................
..................................................................... 99
FF- 27. Tax-Forfeited Properties and Local Special Assessments .................................................... 99
FF- 28. Distribution of Proceeds from the Sale of Tax-Forfeit Property .......................................... 99
FF- 29. State Hazard Mitigation and Response Support ................................................................. 100
FF- 30. Impact Fees ......................................................................................................................... 101
FF- 31. Equity in Library Funding .................................................................................................. 101
FF- 32. Equitable Funding of Community Education Services .................................:.................... 101
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page v
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES LEGISLATIVE STAFF
� Garv Carlson, Intergovernmental Relations Director �carlson(a�lmc.or�
(651) 281-1255
• Aid to cities • Pensions and retirement • Public fmance
• Civil liability • Property tax system
Heather Cederholm, Inter�overnmental Relations Liaison hcederholm�,lmc.orQ
(651) 281-1256
• Housing • Legislative appointrnents • Policy development
• Libraries • Legislative listservs process
• Grassroots member • Policy committees • Sustainable development
advocacy • Taa�-increment fmancing
Anne Finn, Assistant Intergovernmental Relations Director afinn(cr�,lmc.or�
(651)281-1263
• Emergency management • Personnel • State bonding
• Insurance • Public safety • Transportation
• Pensions & retirement
Patrick Hvnes, InterEOVernmental Relations Representative phvnes(a�lmc.orQ
(651) 281-1260
• Building Codes • Land use, zoning, • Public finance
• Civil LiabiliTy annexation • Taa�-increment financing
• Data Practices • Pensions & retirement (TIF)
• Economic development • Property taac system
Craig Johnson, Inter�overnmental Relations Representative ciohnson(a�lmc.or�
� (651) 281-1259
• Energy • Local/tribal relations • Utilities billing
• Environment • State bonding • Wastewater, drinking
• Land use and annexation • Sustainable development water, and stormwater
Ann Lindstrom, Inter�overnmental Relations Representative alindstrom(a�lmc.or�
(651) 281-1261
• Economic development & • Government redesign • Regulated services &
redevelopment • Public safety industries
• Elections
Laura Ziegler, Intergovernmental Relations Liaison lziegl`(cr�,lmc.or�
(651) 281-1267
• Broadband • Legislative • Policy development
• Elections appointments process
• Grassroots member • Legislative listservs • Transportation
advocacy • Policy committees • Underground locating
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page vi
2012 LEGISLATIVE POLICY COMMITTEE MEMBERS
Improving Service Delivery Betsey su�kne�t Northfield, Councilmember
Raeanne Danielowski, Big Lake, Councilmember
Steve Elkins, Metropolitan Council, Member
Chair: Ady Wickstrom, Shoreview, Councilmember Jo Emerson, White Bear Lake, Mayor*
�ce Chair: Marian Clennon, Austin, Sarah Erickson, St. Pau1, I�R
Councilmember " Mary Gaasch, Lauderdale, Councilmember
Gene Abbott, Lakeville, Councilmember gryan Gadow, Wayzata, Planner
Steve Albrecht, Burnsville, Public Works Director Tom Goodwin, Apple Valley, Councilmember
Mark Burch, White Bear Lake, Public Works Dir. g�an Gramentz, New Ulm, City Manager
Chris Cousins, St. Clair, Councilmember Shannon Guernsey, Minnesota NAHRO, Executive
Craig Dawson, Minnehaha Creek Watershed Director
District, Aquatic Invasive Species Program Director Greg Hagy, Cohasset, Mayor
John Ehret, South Metro Fire Dept., Fire Chief Allan Hartkopf, Osseo, Councilmember
Sarah Erickson, St. Paul, IGR Jon Hohenstein, Eagan, Community Dev. Director
Shane Fineran, Waconia, Assistant to Administrator Connie Holmes, Waverly, Mayor
Dan Gustafson, Burnsville, Councilmember Marvin Johnson, Independence, Mayor
Greg Hag,y, Cohasset, Mayor Ron Johnson, Lake City, Administrator
Gary Hansen, Eagan, Councilmember Heather Johnston, Burnsville, Chief Finance Officer
Joel Hanson, Little Canada, Administrator Lori Kampa, Big Lake, Mayor
Laura Hotvet, Shorewood, Councilmember Kelcey Klemm, Perham, City Manager
Mark Karnowski, Princeton, Administrator Susan Larson, Isanti, Councilmember
Susan Larson, Isanti, Councilmember Melissa Lesch, Minneapolis, IGR
Andrea Lauer, Royalton, Mayor Dan Madsen, Madelia, Administrator
Melissa Lesch, Minneapolis, IGR Mark Maloney, Shoreview, Public Works Director
Jeffrey Lunde, Brooklyn Park, Mayor Anne Mavity, St Louis Park, Councilmember
Debra Mangen, Edina, Clerk Tessia Melvin, Shoreview, Asst. to City Manager
Brad Martens, Winsted, Administrator Dave Olson, Lakeville, Comm. Economic Dev. Dir.
Mary McComber, Oak Park Heights, Andru Peters, Lake City, Councilmember
Councilmember Ralph Rauterkus, Red Wing, Councilmember
Sandra Means, Rochester, Councilmember Mike Reardon, St Paul, Cable Commission Officer
Heidi Moegerle, East Bethel, Councilmember Aaron Reeves, Cannon Falls, Administrator
Todd Olson, Metro Cities, IGR David Schmidt, Wabasha, Administrator
Andru Peters, Lake City, Councilmember Mary Sherry, Burnsville, Councilmember
Desyl Peterson, Minnetonka, Attorney Jonathan Smith, Frazee, Administrator-Clerk-
Rhonda Pownell, Northfield, Councilmember* Treasurer
Candy Petersen, North St. Paul, Councilmember Terry Spaeth, Rochester, Senior Admin. Analyst
Tina Rennemo, Baudette, Clerk-Treasurer* Joshua Sprague, Edina, Councilmember
Donna Schmitt, Columbia Heights, Councilmember Steven Stahmer, Rogers, Administrator
Matt Stemwedel, Coon Rapids, Asst. City Manager Charlene Stevens, Willmar, Administrator
John Sweeney, Maple Plain, Mayor John Sweeney, Maple Plain, Mayor
Thomas Terry, Elko New Market, Administrator Charlie Vander Aarde, Metro Cities, IGR
Debbie White, Winona, Councilmember Craig Waldron, Oakdale, Administrator
Nicole Wittig-Geske, St. Paul, Ward 3 Legislative Cheryl Youakim, Hopkins, Councilmember
Aide John Young Jr., Hawley, Councilmember
Improving Local Economies
Human Resources & Data Practices
Chair: Craig Clark, Worthington, Administrator
Vice Chair: Bart Fischer, Falcon Heights, Chair: Brenda Cossette, Fergus Falls, HR Director
Administrator �ce Chair: Aaron Parrish, Forest Lake,
Chad Adams, Albert Lea, City Manager Administrator
David Beaudet, Oak Park Heights, Mayor Krista Amos, Mankato, HR Director
Roger Boughton, Austin, Councilmember Lynne Bankes, White Bear Lake, Police Chief
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page vii
Richard Brainerd, Mahtomedi, Councilmember Brian Gramentz, New Ulm, City Manager
Heather Butkowski, Lauderdale, Administrator Greg Hag,y, Cohasset, Mayor
Deborah Dahl, Fridley, HR Director Marshall Hallock, Red Wing, Finance Director
Terry Dussault, Blaine, HR Director Larry Hansen, Stillwater, Administrator
Laurie Elliott, Shoreview, HR Manager Suzanne Hilgert, Olivia, Mayor
Sarah Erickson, StPaul, IGR Connie Holmes, Waverly, Mayor
Shane Fineran, Waconia, Assistant to Administrator Scott Huizenga, East Grand Forks, Administrator-
Rollin D. Hall, Wabasha, Mayor Clerk-Treasurer
Scott Huizenga, East Grand Forks, Administrator- Jeff Hulsether, Brainerd, Engineer
Clerk-Treasurer Sue Iverson, Arden Hills, Finance Director &
Matt Hylen, St Francis, Administrator* Administrative Services
Sue Iverson, Arden Hills, Finance Director & Alexandra Iverson, St. Paul, Chief Budget Analyst
Administrative Services Heather Johnston, Burnsville, Chief Finance Officer
Shaunna Johnson, Waite Park, Administrator-Clerk- Tom Lawell, Apple Valley, Administrator
Treasurer* Melissa Lesch, Minneapolis, IGR
Schawn Johnson, New Brighton, Assistant to CiTy Peter Lindstrom, Falcon Heights, Mayor
Manager pon Lorsung, Isanti, Administrator
Cindi Joosten, Lakeville, HR Manager Dean Lotter, New Brighton, City Manager
Susan Larson, Isanti, Councilmember Joe Lynch, Inver Grove Heights, Administrator
Craig Mattson, Wyoming, Administrator-Clerk Dan Madsen, Madelia, Administrator
Kay McAloney, Bloomington, HR Director William Malinen, Roseville, City Manager
Angela Nalezny, St Paul, HR Director Ben Martig, Marshall, Administrator
Patricia Nauman, Metro Cities, Executive Director Dan Matejka, Goodview, Administrator
Heidi Omerza, Ely, Councilmember* Paul McLaughlin, Renville, Retiring Administrator-
Dave Osberg, Hastings, Administrator* Clerk
Lori Peterson, Eagan, HR Manager Jordan McQuillen, Renville, Administrator-Clerk
Susan Poulos, Minnetonka, HR Manager Steve Mielke, Lakeville, Administrator
Terry Quigley, Shoreview, Councilmember Justin Miller, Mendota Heights, Administrator
Tina Rennemo, Baudette, Clerk-Treasurer* Steve Nasby, Windom, Administrator*
Martin Scheerer, Edina, Fire Chief Patricia Nauman, Metro Cities, Executive Director
Roger Seymour, Red Wing, Employee Services Dir. Bruce Nawrocki, Columbia Heights,
Janet Shefchik, Dakota County Comm. Dev. Councilmember
Agency, HR Administrator Darin Nelson, Fridley, Interim City Manager
Heather Slechta, Montgomery, Clerk-Treasurer Gary Neumann, Rochester, Assistant Administrator
Dan Tesch, West St. Paul, Interim HR Director Steven Okins, Willmar, Finance Director
Jean Thompson, Moorhead, HR Directar Heidi Omerza, Ely, Councilmember*
Marie Weinand, Rice, Clerk-Treasurer Samantha Orduno, Dayton, Administrator
Brenda Wendlandt, Farmington, HR Director Rod Otterness, International Falls, Administrator*
Crystal Prentice, Waseca, City Manager
Improving Fiscal Futures Michael Rietz, Barnesville, Administrator
Donna Schmitt, Columbia Heights, Councilmember
Mark Sievert, Fergus Falls, Administrator
Chair: Shawn Gillen, Grand Rapids, Administrator* gill Sonmor, Fergus Falls, Finance Director
�ce Chair: Kristi Luger, Excelsior, City Manager Steven Stahmer, Rogers, Administrator
Geralyn Barone, Minnetonka, City Manager Chris Tolbert, St. Paul, Councilmember*
David Beaudet, Oak Park Heights, Mayor Lisa Wieland, Rogers, Finance Director
Austin Bleess, Winnebago, City Administrator Nancy Zaworski, Kasson, Finance Director
Betsey Buckheit, Northfield, Councilmember
William Burns, Fridley, Retiring Administrator *League of Minnesota Cities Board of Directors
Tim Busse, Bloomington, Councilmember
Kevin Carpenter, Minneapolis, Chief Finance Member
Officer
Scott Cordes, St. Paul, Budget Director
Bill Coughlin, Burnsville, Councilmember
Raeanne Danielowski, Big Lake, Councilmember
Sarah Erickson, St. Paul, IGR
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page viii
LMC POLICY DEVELOPMENT PROCESS
The City Policies document addresses more than 160 legislative issues that impact cities and serves
as the foundation of the League of Minnesota Cities (LMC) advocacy efforts. City officials from
across the state are recruited throughout the year to serve on one or more policy committee. Policies
are considered,;discussed, and revised annually with considerable member input. Then, draft policies `
are published online for member comments before being considered for approval by the LMC Board
of Directors: Guided by the City Policies, LMC member cities and staff actively advocate for city-
friendly legislation. Below are some of the major events in the policy development process:
January The Minnesota Legislature begins the first session of each two-year biennium
in January of odd-numbered years. This year, the legislative convenes on
January 8, 2013.
February/March The Legislature typically begins the second session of each biennium in
February or March of even-numbered years.
March/April The Joint Legislative Conference (March 21, 2013) brings city, county, school
district, and township leaders to St. Paul for policy updates and meetings with
state lawmakers. In March, the National League of Cities hosts the
Congressional City Congress in Washington, D.C.
May Under the Minnesota Constitution, the deadline to end any legislative session is
the first Monday following the third Saturday in May. The governor may call
special legislative sessions when necessary.
June At the LMC Annual Conference (June 19-21, 2013), members provide
comments on City Policies throughout the conference and during the
Legislative Update.
July Policy committees hold their first of three meetings. The July meeting typically
includes a review of the most recent legislative session and a preliminary
discussion on emerging issues and accomplished city policies.
August Policy committees hold their second of three meetings to hear from subject-
matter experts on existing and potential new policy topics.
September Policy committees meet for a third time to finalize their work and make specific
policy recommendations to the LMC Board of Directors.
October Draft policies, as approved by the policy committees, are shared with members
online for the comment period. Member input is also sought from city officials
attending LMC Regional Meetings each fall.
November The LMC Board of Directors reviews member input, then considers and
amends the policies for the following calendar year. The Board adopts policies
on behalf of League members before the start of the next legislative session.
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page ix
GENERAL POLICY STATEMENT
The League of Minnesota Cities serves as a forum for cities to define common problems, and to
develop policies and proposals to solve those problems.
The League represents 832 of Minnesota's 853 cities, as well as 1 l townships and 54 special
districts. All sizes of communities are represented among LMC members (the largest non-
member city has a population of 207) and all regions of the state are represented.
The following policies address specific city issues. Two principles guide the development of all
LMC policies:
1. There is a need for a governmental system that allows flexibility and authority for cities
to meet the challenges of governing and providing citizens with services, while at the
same time protecting cities from unfunded or underfunded mandates, liability or other
financial risk, and restrictions on local control.
2. The financial and technical requirements for governing and providing services
necessitate a continuing and strengthened partnership with federal, state, and local
governments. This partnership, particularly in the areas of finance, development,
housing, environment and transportation, is critical for the successful operation of
Minnesota's cities and the well-being of residents.
STATEMENT OF INTENT
There are many issues impacting the effectiveness of city government to improve community
life, improve the fiscal future and service delivery of city government, and improve the local
economy.
What follows are statements of the issues facing cities and LMC-proposed responses to these
issues. These statements of issues and proposed responses form the City Policies and direct the
League's advocacy efforts. With the fluid nature of emerging issues, state and national politics,
and current events, additional and alternative responses to these issues may be proposed for
consideration after the policies have been adopted. If policy statements are changed outside of
the standard process, members of the LMC will be notified of those changes through LMC
member publications.
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page x
LEAGUE 4F MINNESOTA CITIES
� ��
a
. ..
IMPROVING SERVICE DELIVERY
SD-1. Unfunded Mandates effective only after approval by the local
government unit, unless general state law
Issue: Federal and state mandated provides otherwise. Under state statute, a
programs substitute the judgment of special law is not effective unless approved
Congress, the president, the Minnesota by the affected local unit of government,
Legislature, and the governor for local except under limited circumstances.
budget priorities. These mandates force
cities to reduce funding for other basic In recent years, the Legislature has
services or to increase taxes and service occasionally enacted general laws that affect
charges. a single local unit of government. By
enacting a general law with limited
Response: application, local approval is not required.
a) Existing unfunded mandates should Response: The League of Minnesota
be reviewed and modified, or repealed Cities supports the constitutional
where possible. requirement that a special law must be
b) No additional statewide mandates approved by the affected local unit of
should be enacted unless full funding government before it can take effect. If a
for the mandate is provided by the law is intended to affect or benefit a single
level of government imposing it or a local unit of government, the Legislature
permanent stable revenue source is must follow the requirements for enacting
established. a special law set forth in the Minnesota
c) Cities should not be forced to comply Constitution and in state statute. The
with unfunded mandates. League specifically opposes the
d) Cities should be given the greatest Legislature's technique of bypassing the
flexibility possible in implementing constitution by not naming the local
mandates to ensure their cost is government, but describing the local
minimized. government in such narrow terms that it
e) The legislative government redesign can only apply to one entity.
groups created in 2010 should
consider the various unfunded SD-3. Redesigning and Reinventing
mandates as they look at local Government
government reform and redesign and
make recommendations for the next Issue: Every level of government is
session. redesigning, reinventing, and reevaluating
its organizational structure and programs in
SD-2. Local Approval of Special response to financial realities and citizens'
Laws needs and problems. Refortns, however,
must be more than change for the sake of
Issue: The Minnesota Constitution prohibits change to existing programs. It is
special legislation except for certain special imperative that government officials talk
laws relating to local government. It with citizens about how services are
provides that a special law must name the currently provided and how they can be best
affected local unit of government and is provided in the future.
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 1
During the spring and fall of 201 i, the service to citizens is evaluated and
League of Minnesota Cities engaged over citizen demands and expectations are
730 citizens in 12 cities around the state in adequately addressed.
Community Conservations as part of the b) Engage as many citizens as possible,
"Cities, Services, and Funding" project. The from diverse backgrounds and interests,
goal of these conservations was to talk with to determine what services matter most
as many Minnesotans as possible from all to citizens and how the delivery of those
walks of life about what services cities services can be changed to increase
provide, how they are provided, and how efficiency and lower cost.
these services are paid for. Community c) Educate citizens about what services
Conversations utilized funding and logistical government delivers, how they are
support from nonprofits and government delivered, and how those services are
entities on a local and state level; this model funded.
can be used in future efforts to educate d) Engage in traditional and nontraditional
residents and gather input about the future of partnerships to make service changes
city services. and do things in new ways.
e) Identify and repeal programs or
Participants called for increased discontinue services that are no longer
volunteerism and were open to the idea of necessary, and evaluate which services
cities seeking new partners, making service can readily and fairly be provided by. the
changes, and finding non-traditional ways to private sector.
pay for services. In short, their message
was: "Do things in new ways." Response: Federal, state, and county
governments should:
To be meaningful, redesign of governmental
entities and services should: a) Promote and support local redesign
efforts through incentives rather than
a) save money where feasible, mandates.
b) deliver improved services, b) Communicate and establish a process
c) serve essential needs, and of negotiation before shifting
d) be equitably structured. responsibility for delivering services
from one level of government to
Cities have and will continue to re-evaluate another, or seeking to reduce service
city programs and services, pursue the use of duplication.
cooperative agreements, and consider c) Utilize government entities with
organizational changes that provide greater proven track records in redesign
government efficiency and result in better efforts.
service to citizens. Citizen input and .
participation should be gathered and taken SD-4. State Government Shutdowns
into account as decisions about service
delivery are being made and implemented. Issue: Twice in less than one decade, the
state Legislature and governor failed to
All levels of government are encouraged to: reach a global agreement on the state budget
a) Ensure that in redesigning, reinventing by the end of the fiscal biennium (June 30 of
odd-numbered years). As a result of these
or reassigning government services and impasses, portions of state government were
programs, the appropriate level of shut down. The shutdowns, particularly the
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 2
shutdown in 2011, created a range of The Legislature should also pass
challenges for cities, as well as for the legislation that allows existing licenses of
state's courts, residents, businesses, licensed public employees to be continued during
professionals, state employees and others. any future state government shutdown
and should identify additional areas, such
For cities, the most pronounced challenges as electrical and plumbing inspection and
related to the shutdowns were as follows: plumbing plan review, where local
governments could reasonably step in to
a) Uncertainty about the timing and handle the inspections, review, and
amount of aid and credit approval necessary for local projects to
reimbursement payments and the move forward, and allows work on
distribution of local sales tax approved projects to continue in state
revenues. rights-of-way.
b) Inability of licensed city
professionals such as peace officers SD-5. City Costs for Enforcing
and water treatment facility operators State and Local Laws
to renew licenses.
c) Loss of access to critical information Issue: Cities experience substantial costs
such as the Bureau of Criminal enforcing state and local laws, particularly
Apprehension database and state- those related to traffic, controlled
mandated reports. substances, and incarceration of prisoners.
d) The shutdown of transportation The current method in our criminal justice
projects on the trunk highway and system of recovering costs for law
state aid system. enforcement and prosecution through fines
e) Interruption of local economic is insufficient to meet the costs incurred by
development due to state having sole local governments. Further, when a violator
authority to inspect, review and requests relief from paying the full amount
approve various plans and types of of the fine and surcharge, the courts have
projects. been more inclined to waive the fine than to
Response: The League of Minnesota reduce the surcharge. When this occurs, the
Cities urges the Legislature and governor local units of government recover no costs
to establish a procedure in state law to even though the city has incurred expenses.
continue certain state government Response: The Legislature should review
operations into a new biennium in the this issue and adopt measures that
event that the governor and legislators provide for complete reimbursement of
cannot reach a budget agreement. the costs incurred by local governments in
Specifically, the Legislature and governor enforcing state and local laws. For
should modify state law to assure that the example, the Legislature should closely
staff necessary to distribute state funds monitor whether local units of
that are already encumbered or government incur additional enforcement
statutorily appropriated to local and/or prosecution costs as a result of the
governments are distributed as statutorily recently reduced driving while intoxicated
scheduled or in the absence of a statutory �DWI) threshold. The state should
payment schedule, are released in a provide the necessary funding to
predictable and timely manner in the compensate local units of government for
event of future shutdowns.
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 3
related cost increases. Solutions that Additionally, Minn. Stat. § 500.20, entitled
should be considered include: "Defeasible Estates," provides in subd. 2a
that private covenants, conditions or
a) Increasing fine amounts. restrictions that affect the title or use of real
b) Removing or modifying county estate cease to be valid 30 years after the
and state surcharges that conflict date of the instrument creating them and
with cost recovery principles. they may be disregarded. This provision
c) Requiring the courts to consider was initially enacted in 1988.
ordering restitution from the
defendant to reimburse the costs of Minn. Stat. ch. 84C regarding conservation
enforcement and prosecution as easements was enacted in 1985, and Minn.
part of any sentence based on Stat. § 84.64 and § 84.65 regarding
ability to pay. conservation restrictions were originally
d) Requiring that if a court reduces enacted in 1974. Because conservation
the amount paid by a violator, any easements and conservation restrictions are
reduction should be made from the not listed among the restrictions that are not
surcharge and not the fine. subject to Minn. Stat. § 500.20, subd. 2a, it
is possible to conclude, by negative
SD-6. Duration of Conservation implication, that this subd. 2a does apply to
Easements the conservation easements and conservation
restrictions created by earlier enacted
Issue: The Minnesota Marketable Title Act statues. This conclusion is inconsistent with
provides that any deed over 40 years old can the language in Minn. Stat. § 84C.02(b) that
be disregarded unless the holder of the "a conservation easement is unlimited in
interest re-records it. There is an exception duration unless the instrument creating it
for a person in possession of the property. A otherwise provides."
2010 Minnesota Supreme Court decision
said that the person in possession has to Response: The League of Minnesota
show that the possession has been visible Cities supports legislation that excepts
enough to put a prudent person on notice of holders of conservation easements from
the interest, and that the possession has to be re-recording the easements under the
continuous. See, Sampair v. Village of Minnesota Marketable Title Act and that
Birchwood, 784 N.W. 2d 65 (Minn. 2010). clarifies that Minn. Stat. § 500.20, subd.
2a, does not apply to conservation
This creates issues for cities that have easements and restrictions.
conservation easements. It is difficult, if not
impossible, to show actual use of the SD-7. Responsibility for Locating
easement because conservation easements Private Underground Facilities
are passive easements, not active ones. As a
result, cities will have to re-record the Issue: Cities are responsible for complying
easements every 40 years in order to with state pipeline safety regulations that
maintain them. This will result in a hold cities responsible for locating and
significant administrative burden and marking private service laterals that connect
increase costs for local units of government in public rights-of-way to ciTy sanitary and
due to staff time, legal fees and recording storm sewer, water, and district heating
fees. systems. The Minnesota Office of Pipeline
Safety (MnOPS) is proposing amendments
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 4
to state pipeline and safety rules related to cities to mark underground facilities of all
the definition of excavation and changes to sizes and materials.
mandatory damage reporting.
The League recognizes that trenchless
Cities are concerned that damage to private excavation presents concerns to cities.
service laterals within the public right-of- Private property owners in the excavation
way continues due, in part, to construction area must receive advance notice of any
methods during the replacement, repair trenchless or other excavation activities
andlor installation of underground utilities that could affect the quality of utility
which cross city water and sewer services services. Notice must include at least one
that are in the public rights-of-way. phone number for assistance in case of
Trenchless excavation could potentially any service problems.
cause damage to underground service
laterals and negatively impact the quality of Contractors must comply with city
utility services. permits requiring that the drill head be
visible when crossing any paint marks
Response: The League supports the and moving through the pothole at the
changes to the definition of excavation depth that the city allows for the
presented by MnOPS at the 2012 Review installation.
of ch. 216D. Cities support the
elimination of windbreaks, shelterbelts, Cities must not be required to locate
and tree plantations from the definition of privately-owned water and sewer laterals
excavation, unless any of these activities and must not be held responsible for
disturbs the soil to a depth of 18 inches or actions by excavators when the city
more. determines not to locate such facilities.
Excavators should be responsible for
The League supports exempting normal locating and protecting any private
maintenance of roads and streets from the service lateral that is impacted by
definition of excavation if the excavation activities conducted on private
maintenance does not change the original property beyond the public right-of-way.
grade and does not involve the road ditch
by including a definition of "original SD-8 Utility Relocation Under
grade," which would provide that Design Road Construction
"original grade is the grade at the date of
issue of the �rst notice by the excavator." Issue: The Minnesota Department of
Transportation (MnDOT) has promoted
The League supports increasing MnOPS legislation relating to the design-build
fines for violators of state pipeline safety construction process that would require
requirements, bringing state penalties in private and public utilities to be responsible
line with federal penalties. for utility relocation necessitated by road
construction. The policy, if enacted, would
The League opposes mandatory damage create unanticipated costs for utilities owned
reporting and recommends a simple and operated by cities. Municipally-owned
standardized form to encourage cities to utilities would be unreasonably held to the
voluntarily report damages. The League same standards as privately-owned utilities
opposes requirements that would force that exist in the public right-of-way.
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 5
Response: The League of Minnesota and staffing standards. If mandated, the
Cities supports use of the design-build NFPA standards would force local
procedure; however, municipal utilities governments to shift dollars from fire
that exist in the public right-of-way prevention programs to fire suppression
should not be penalized under this activities, potentially increasing the risk
process. Municipal utilities legitimately of �re and the danger to locai frefighters.
exist in the public right-of-way. When a
MnDOT construction project requires the The League of Minnesota Cities opposes
relocation of utilities, the cost of any attempt to mandate standards for
relocating municipal utilities should be minimum staffing levels of fire,
shared equitably between MnDOT and specialized or ElVIS vehicles controlled by
affected municipal utilities. units of local government. The League
also opposes any attempt to adopt a
SD-9 National Fire Protection standard dictating or affecting the
Association {NFPA) Standards response time of any fre, specialized or
EMS vehicle.
Issue: The National Fire Protection
Association (NFPA) is an international SD-10 Fire Mutual Aid
association of individuals and trade and
professional organizations that deals with Issue: City and township fire departments
fire and life safety. The NFPA has regularly assist each other with firefighting
advocated legislation that would mandate and other response activities. This mutual
two standards: NFPA 1710, Organization aid is mostly authorized by individual
and Deployment of Fire Suppression written contracts with each city or township,
Operations, Emergency Medical Operations, Which results in a patchwork of different
and Special Operations to the Public by agreements with different provisions. Often,
Career Fire Departments, and NFPA 1720, each city attorney recommends different
Organization and Deployment of Fire provisions.
Suppression, Emergency Medical Following the Red River floods and the St.
Operations, and Special Operations to the
Public by Volunteer Fire Departments. Peter tornados, emergency responders
NFPA standards 1710 and 1720 define (including fire departments) met and helped
minimum response times, minimum fire pass a statute to govern mutual aid situations
company staffing levels, initial full alarm When there is an emergency declared by
response levels, and extra alarm response mayor or governor and no written
levels. Although NFPA codes and standards agreements exist. The statute, Minn. Stat. §
are voluntary, they are often adopted by 12.331, provides a framework for how
local jurisdictions. NFPA standards 1710 �'orker's compensation, liability, property
and 1720 pre-empt local authority and place claims, insurance, and charges between the
a one-size-fits-all mandate on all cities. departments will be handled in mutual aid
situations.
Response: Levels of service delivery for
fire and emergency medical services The League of Minnesota Cities Insurance
(EMS) have always been determined by Trust (LMCIT) developed a model mutual
local jurisdictions. The NFPA has gone aid agreement that contains the same basic
outside its authority in proposing the structure for liability as the statute. Many
national minimum response, operating, cities have entered into area-wide mutual aid
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 6
agreements that are similar to the LMCIT entities) explicitly addressed these concerns.
model agreement. To provide uniformity, Since the new law passed, interest has been
there should be a statute that is similar to expressed by public safety groups and
Minn. Stat. § 12.331, to govern daily fire individual cities in entering into joint powers
mutual aid situations that do not rise to the agreements with federally recognized Indian
level of emergencies. tribes. However, legislative guidance is
needed to address concerns related to
Response: The Legislature should pass a sovereignty, insurance and liability limits for
statute to provide uniform provisions these agreements.
when fire departments assist each other.
These provisions should include statutory Response: Include in Minn. Stat. § 471.59
definitions and clarifications for: (the joint powers statute) language
substantially similar to Minn. Stat. §
a) Who is in command of the mutual 626.93 that clarifies that Indian tribes
aid scene. entering into joint powers relationships
b) Who will cover the firefighters for agree to:
worker's compensation.
c) How liability and property claims a) be subject to liability for its torts and
will be handled. those of its officers, employees, and
d) Who will pay for expendable agents acting within the scope of their
supplies such as foam. employment or duties arising out of
e) When fire departments will charge the joint powers agreement to the
each other for these services. same extent as a municipality under
f� The ability for fire departments to Minn. Stat. ch. 466; and
opt out by having a separate b) notwithstanding Minn. Stat. § 16C.05,
written agreement. subd. 7, waive its sovereign immunity
with respect to claims arising from
SD-11. Clarification of Joint Powers liability under the joint powers
Relationships with Federally
Recognized Indian Tribes SD-12. Ambulance Service Costs
and Liability
Issue: During the 2010 legislative session,
Minn. Stat. § 471.59 was modified to allow Issue: The cost of providing ambulance care
federally recognized Indian tribes to has increased steadily over the last several
participate in joint powers agreements with years due in part to changes in Medicare
other governmental entities, including reimbursement. T'he federal Balanced
Minnesota cities. Indian tribes are Budget Act (BBA) of 1997 made two
extremely unique legal entities under federal significant changes to ambulance billing.
law and international treaties. The new law First, the act mandated that all ambulance
was a broad brush authorization that did not services accept Medicare assignments as
address important issues that uniquely arise payment in full; that is, ambulance services
when dealing with Indian tribes related to cannot bill the Medicare patient for any
sovereignty, insurance liability and liability unpaid balance beyond the Medicare
limits (commonly called "tort caps"). payment. Second, the act mandated a
Previous laws, such as Minn. Stat. § 626.93 uniform fee schedule that was implemented
(authorizing tribes to act as law enforcement in April 2002. The new fee schedule
significantly reduced reimbursement levels
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 7
for many ambulance services. The BBA In addition, the liability exposure of inedical
mandates are impacting the ability of some directors associated with ambulance service
Minnesota ambulance service providers to is a concern. While medical directors of
adequately fund their operations. government-based ambulance services may
arguably be covered by public official
The loss of revenue due to Medicare immunity, the law is unclear and should be
reimbursement changes, coupled with higher clarified.
insurance rates, is affecting the ability of
many non-government-based ambulance Response: The League of Minnesota
service providers to deliver emergency care, Cities supports federal legislation that
particularly in rural Minnesota. All would:
ambulance services and personnel are
regulated by Minn. Stat. ch. 144E and must a) Require Medicare to set
comply with the same licensing, training, ambulance payment rates at the
and equipment-related requirements, "national average cost" of
regardless of ownership. However, non- providing service.
government-based ambulance service b) Require adequate reimbursement
providers are treated differently from for ambulance providers.
government-based service providers in terms c) Establish a"prudent layperson"
of exposure to liability. While government- standard for the payment of
based ambulance service providers have emergency ambulance claims such
specific statutory caps on damages that limit that if a reasonable person
their liability, non-government-based believed an emergency medical
ambulance service providers are not problem existed when the
protected by such caps. Consequently, non- ambulance was requested,
government-based ambulance service Medicare would pay the claim.
providers have experienced inordinate d) Make it easier for providers to file
growth in their insurance rates. claims with Medicare by
eliminating a processing system
Non-government-based ambulance service that often leads to the rejection of
liability exposure is a concern for three legitimate reimbursement claims.
reasons. First, municipalities that contract
for ambulance service may be required to The League also urges the Legislature to
purchase excess liability coverage in order extend the protection of the state and
to protect non-government-based ambulance municipal Tort Claims Act to, at a
service providers against claims. Second, it minimum, licensed third parties that
may discourage mutual aid agreements contract with a municipality to provide
between government- and non-government- ambulance services. The League also
based ambulance service providers. Finally, supports insuring the applicability of
unlimited liability exposure threatens the public official immunity to medical
existence of small, non-government-based directors in the course of ambulance
rural ambulance providers, which could service activities.
leave large geographic areas without any
ambulance service and undermine SD-13. Fees for Service
emergency response to mass casualty
incidents. Issue: While general services—such as
permitting, inspections or enforcement—are
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 8
typically funded out of a city's general fund, to publish and the costs of publication are
cities often impose fees to cover the cost of burdensome. In view of the fact that the
providing certain services, permits, and media and newspaper industry continues to
licenses. experience significant changes and declining
subscriptions, technological advancements
The Legislature and interest groups often have expanded options cities can use to
seek to mandate or preserve fee limitations provide information to citizens, and citizens
for city services. Over the last several years, are demanding and expecting it. These new
the Legislature has enacted a number of new technologies are often more efficient, widely
laws designed to rigorously control local and easily accessible and cost effective.
fee-setting authority. Examples of such Current state law regarding public access to
mandates include placing limits on coin- city codes of ordinances should also address
operated amusement machine license fees, these changes for how citizens, the private
on-sale and off-sale liquor license fees, sector and other entities will have access to
license fees for retailers selling fireworks, alternatives to existing news publications to
deputy registrar fees and planning and obtain official government notices,
zoning fees. The state also requires cities documents and information they seek.
that collect more than $5,000 in
development-related fees each year to Response: Cities should be authorized to:
annually report all construction and
development fees to the Department of a) Take advantage of new
Labor and Industry. technologies to increase the
dissemination of information to
Response: While the state has a role in citizens and potentially lower the
providing a general, statewide funding associated costs.
policy, the state should not interfere in the b) Designate an appropriate
decision-making functions performed by daily/weekly publication.
cities when setting city budgets to provide c) Use alternative means of
city services. The League of Minnesota communication such as city
Cities seeks authority for cities to charge newsletters, cable television, video
fees that are reasonably related to the cost streaming, e-mail, blogs and city
of providing the service, permit or license. web sites.
The League opposes legislation that d) Expand the use of summaries
would require specific methods to pay for where information is technical or
city services or would place caps on city lengthy.
fees.
Cities should also be authorized to
SD-14. Providing Information to publish and provide public access to local
Citizens codes of ordinances on a website
accessible to the public and to post
Issue: To keep the public updated and revisions and changes to city codes,
infortned, state law requires local units of resolutions, and rules on the city website,
government to publish various official when feasible. Additionally, the
notifications and documents in newspapers Legislature should eliminate outdated or
and often dictates which newspapers receive unnecessary publication requirements.
cities' publication business. The number and
variety of documents that cities are required
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 9
SD-15. Special Assessment and enforcement of liquor license and
Procedure tobacco license violations.
Issue: The special assessment process in In 2009, the Legislature amended Minn.
, Minn. Stat. § 429.061 establishes discrete Stat. ch. 169, the chapter of law pertaining
timelines and procedures for an individual to state traffic regulations, to allow cities
who chooses to challenge a special and counties to issue administrative citations
assessment. An individual can formally for certain minor traffic offenses. Since the
object to the assessment through a signed, passage of the 2009 administrative traffic
written objection that is either filed with the citations law, some people have questioned
city clerk prior to the assessment hearing or Whether administrative citations for non-
is presented to the presiding officer at the traffic, liquor, and tobacco iicense code
assessment hearing. When the challenge is violations can be legally issued by statutory
presented to the presiding officer at the cities given that state law does not expressly
hearing, the city council and staff are provide authority on other code matters.
frequently unable to respond immediately to
the objections. Response: The League of Minnesota
Cities continues to support the use of city
Response: The statute governing the administrative fines for local regulatory
special assessment process should be ordinances, such as building codes, zoning
amended to require objections be filed codes, health codes, public nuisance
with the city clerk no later than ten ordinances, and regulatory matters that
business days following the date notice are not duplicative of misdemeanor or
was sent to the registered owner of higher level state traffic and criminal
record. offenses. The Legislature should clarify
that both statutory and home rules
SD-16. Administrative Fines for charter cities have the authority to issue
Code Violations administrative citations for code
violations. Further, state statute should
Issue: Many statutory and home rule charter allow statutory and home rule charter
cities have implemented administrative cities to adjudicate administrative
enforcement programs for violations of local citations and to assess a lien on properties
regulatory ordinances such as building for unpaid administrative fines.
codes, zoning codes, health codes, and
public nuisance ordinances. This use of SD-17. Contracting and Purchasing
administrative proceedings has kept
enforcement at the local level and reduced Issue: Minnesota statutes stipulate
pressure on over-burdened district court contracting and purchasing requirements for
systems. Cities using administrative Minnesota cities. The law prescribes the
enforcement processes experience a lower process political subdivisions must use to
cost of enforcement and a quicker resolution make purchases and award contracts, and
to code violations. requires a competitive sealed bid procedure
for contracts or purchases over $100,000.
Minnesota statutes expressly provide the The intent of these statutory requirements is
authority for all cities to utilize to provide taxpayers with the best value for
administrative enforcement of local codes their dollar and ensure integrity in the
process. However, imposing these statutory
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 10
requirements may, at times, result in improvements in excess of $200,000 be
political subdivisions paying more for goods published in a city's qualified newspaper,
and services than private entities under the and in either a newspaper published in a city
same circumstances. of the first class or a"trade paper." Minn.
Stat. § 331A.03, subd. 3 allows cities to
The Legislature recognized the benefits designate "recognized industry trade
associated with alternative purchasing journals" as an alternative means of
methods when it amended municipal disseminating certain bids, requests for
contracting law in 2004 to authorize the use information, and requests for proposals,
of reverse auctions to purchase supplies, although this phrase is not defined in statute.
materials, and equipment. Similarly, other Minnesota Statutes § 331A.12 only allows
contracting procedures, including "design- political subdivisions to publish local
build" and direct negotiation are proven transportation RFPs on their websites.
alternatives to the formal bidding process.
Authorizing broader use of these types of Publication requirements should be designed
alternatives as the Legislature did in 2009 by to ensure that all potential bidders see the
authorizing a design-build pilot program, advertisements for bids, which should result
would enhance the ability of cities to make in lower project costs for cities. The
appropriate and fiscally responsible statutory definition of a"trade paper" is
purchasing decisions. outdated, and does not include websites that
have become standard in the construction
Response: The League of Minnesota industry. The phrase "recognized industry
Cities supports broader use of alternative trade journals" is undefined. Many cities
contracting and purchasing methods that already use industry-standard websites in
streamline the process and reduce local addition to publication in "trade papers"
purchasing costs. Specifically, the League because they allow bidders on-line access to
supports authorizing cities to use the plans and specifications at no cost to cities.
design-build procedure and providing Eliminating duplicative publication in
municipalities with broader authority, newspapers that do not reach potential
similar to that of private businesses, to bidders would reduce project costs for cities
directly negotiate contracts. The without limiting the distribution of notice
Legislature should establish a task force and information to the general public.
to review municipal contracting laws, and
consider contracting and purchasing Response: The Legislature should amend
reforms that give cities the flexibility to Minn. Stat. § 429.041, subd. 1 and Minn.
provide quality goods and services at the Stat. § 331A.03, subd. 3 to allow cities to
lowest cost to taxpayers. use the most up-to-date and cost-effective
means of advertising bids and to
SD-18. Modernizing Bid eliminate publication requirements that
Publication Requirements do not further the goals of municipal
contracting law or benefit the taxpayers.
Issue: Minnesota law mandates multiple
publication requirements for cities when SD-19. City Enterprise Operations
advertising for bids. Minn. Stat. § 429.041,
subd.l requires that bids for improvements Issue: Historically, city enterprise
in excess of $100,000 be published in a operations have been created in response to
city's qualified newspaper, and that bids for community needs, lack of a private market,
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 11
financial reporting requirements, state and The process of adopting state law based
federal mandates, to enforce state and local on good public policy is best upheld and
law, and to ensure a quality of life for the supported by increasing the
residents of a community. Establishing an accountability and responsiveness of the
enterprise operation allows a city to provide legislative process, not by circumventing
a desired service while maintaining financial it. Presenting complex issues to voters in
control over service levels, costs, and public the guise of direct democracy further
inputs. weakens representative government.
In some cases, enterprise operations produce A state constitutional amendment to
general public benefits and may require provide for initiative and referendum
public support to ensure a desired level of subjects cities and their residents and
service at a reasonable cost. The benefits of taxpayers to the unintended outcomes of
an enterprise operation, therefore, should be sometimes unwise attempts to place
evaluated not solely in terms of profitability significant public policy decisions into the
but also on the service benefits to citizens of hands of special interests that can raise
the community. unlimited funds for the purpose of
promoting their more narrow interests.
Response: The League of Minnesota
Cities supports the local decisions made SD-21. Civil Liability of Local
by cities to deliver services by establishing Governments
a city enterprise operation. The state
should refrain from infringing on the Issue: One of the barriers to the delivery of
ability of a city to provide services for its governmental services and programs is the
community. exposure of local governments and their
officials to civil damage claims. The state
SD-20. Initiative and Referendum has acted to protect itself and its local
governments by enacting exceptions and
Issue: The Legislature has frequently limitations to liability suits, and authorizing
considered legislation to establish initiative self-insurance and other mechanisms to deal
and referendum by proposing to place a with claims allowed by law.
question for voter approval on the state
general election ballot to amend the state Response: The League of Minnesota
constitution to allow voters to initiate or Cities supports•
repeal state laws by submitting a petition �
which would cause such questions to be a) Creating an exception to municipal
placed on the state general election ballot. tort indemnification law, Minn.
Stat. § 466.07, where an employee
Response: Cities strongly support our is defended and indemnified for
representational system of governance claims under a contract of
and, therefore, oppose amending the state insurance carried by the employee.
constitution to provide for initiative and b) Egtending the protection of the
referendum. The Legislature is the state and municipal Tort Claims
appropriate governing body to consider Act to quasi-governmental entities
and enact public policy that reflects when performing public services
statewide interests. such as firefighting or licensed
third-party ambulance providers
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 12
that contract with a municipality the U.S. Supreme Court's 2005 decision
to provide ambulance services. Kelo v. City of New London, which upheld
c) Existing constitutional safeguards the ability of local governments to use
for protecting public and private eminent domain for economic development
property interests without any purposes, the Legislature enacted significant
statutory expansion of property restrictions on cities' use of eminent domain
rights. for economic development and
d) Clarifying and maintaining the redevelopment, and imposed new
applicability of municipal compensation and procedural requirements
immunity in various areas, that apply to all condemnation actions,
including, but not limited to, including those for traditional public uses
vicarious official immunity and such as roads, parks, and schools.
park and recreational immunity, Legislation to control cities' abilities to
including the extension to entities perform regulatory acts—such as road
providing a public service that rights-of-way condemnation, shooting range
have not traditionally been zoning, and amortization—has also received
included within the immunity (e.g., strong support from legislators. In addition,
state trails over municipal utility some legislators would like to authorize
easements). businesses to seek inverse condemnation
e) Preserving recent changes to when a governmental entity enters the
Minnesota's joint and several business market and provides competing
liability laws that require a goods or services or limits the number of
municipality to be at least 50 businesses that can operate privately or
percent at fault to be held receive public contracts. Finally, bills have
responsible for 100 percent of a been introduced to codify the property rights
damage award. section of the Minnesota Constitution.
� Reasonable limits on the amount
and circumstances in which The League of Minnesota Cities supports
statutory attorney fees may be local governments' ability to balance the
awarded in order to encourage rights of private landowners with the
settlement by all parties and interests of the public. The League,
decrease the likelihood of however, is concerned that aggressive
litigation. efforts by property rights advocates to limit
g) Preserving the essential structure local government authority, or require
of the local government tort compensation for regulatory actions that
liability caps in Minn. Stat. § impact private property, will adversely
466.04. impact cities in four ways.
SD-22 Private Property Rights and First, such legislative initiatives threaten a
Takings wide array of planning, environmental,
historic preservation, and land conservation
Issue: The Legislature has considered an measures and undermine the fundamental
increasing number of bills designed to responsibility of cities to protect the public
diminish or limit local governments' ability health, safety, and welfare of its citizens.
to exercise traditional planning, zoning, and Second, recent changes to Minnesota's
eminent domain authority. In the wake of eminent domain statute create uncertainty in
the law that will delay resolution of
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 13
condemnation cases, cost taxpayers more for use or reduces the value of private
public projects, and make it more difficult property.
for cities to assemble the parcels of land
needed to facilitate critical development and The League supports legislation that:
redevelopment projects. Third, allowing
businesses to seek inverse condemnation a) Authorizes cities to use eminent
when a city provides competing goods or domain for economic development
services or limits the number of private and redevelopment projects that
operators would discourage cities from advance a greater public good that
undertaking public-private partnerships, benefits the community.
such as organized collection of solid waste b) Empowers local elected officials to
to manage flow, addressing public safety determine whether a particular
concerns, and minimizing wear and tear on taking of property serves a public
local infrastructure. Fourth, if the purpose.
Legislature acts to codify part of the c) Creates incentives to encourage
Minnesota Constitution, an argument could landowners to voluntarily sell their
be made that the Legislature intended to property to the public for
create new causes of action against cities. development or redevelopment.
This would encourage more lawsuits and
expose cities to the expense of defending SD-23. Organized Solid Waste
those cases. Collection
Response: State law must continue to Issue: "Organized collection" is the term
provide cities with the tools needed to used to refer to a situation where a local unit
balance the rights of private property of government, for any of a variety of
owners with the interests of the public. reasons, decides that there is a public
The League of Minnesota Cities opposes interest served by limiting the number of
legislation that diminishes the ability of solid waste and recycling collection services
cities to act in the best interest of the available in the area. The reasons for
health, safety, and welfare of its citizens; implementing organized collection can vary,
that increases the cost of doing business but include:
for the public good; or that creates the
possibility of additional lawsuits against a) Public safety concerns caused by the
cities. number and frequency of large
trucks moving quickly through
Specifically, the League opposes residential neighborhoods.
legislation that: b) Reducing wear on public
infrastructure from heavy truck
a) Allows businesses to seek inverse traffic.
condemnation when a city c) Improving the efficiency, cost and
provides competing goods or quality of garbage and recycling
services, or limits the number of service provided to local residents.
private operators. d) Cooperating with other local
b) Creates an automatic cause of governments to best meet solid waste
action for damages any time a management and recycling
local regulatory action impacts the objectives.
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 14
e) Taking local steps to reduce energy contracting decisions, would clearly run
impacts of public services. counter to the public purpose of government
� Meeting the requirements of county providing services at the lowest feasible cost
ordinances and solid waste to taxpayers.
management plans as required under
Minn. Stat. § 115.94. Response: The League of Minnesota
Cities opposes efforts to apply inverse
Organized collection is also encouraged in condemnation claims to city solid waste
state solid waste policies as a means of contracting decisions or to allow
improving the efficiency and coordination of automatic contractual damage claims for
solid waste management between local units solid waste haulers that lose competitive
of government. There are very specific and bids in organized collection communities.
burdensome public procedures laid out in
statute defining how such a decision must be Further, the League supports the current
publicly vetted and approved and over what state policy that organized collection is a
time period that can occur. valuable tool as part of a comprehensive
solid waste and recycling management
Despite all of these important and valid program and recognizes the need to
reasons for using organized collection, protect and preserve the authority of
legislation has been discussed in several cities to adopt solid waste service
recent sessions that would allow special contracts that protect public safety, the
takings claims or contractual damages to be environment and public infrastructure.
claimed by the solid waste industry if local The process for establishing organized
governments make decisions that limit the collection should be streamlined to allow
number of companies that can collect cities to utilize this option more readily if
garbage in a community in a manner that it is determined to be the preferred solid
prevents a company currently operating in waste collection option.
the community from continuing to do so
through the implementation of organized SD-24 Private Well Drilling
collection. The unspecified and ongoing
liability this change would create would Issue: The state has continued to place
have the effect of eliminating organized requirements on public water supply
collection as a waste management option. providers to add drinking water treatment
This change would also create a virtual and testing, to restrict the volume of water
monopoly situation for any company used, and to increase the cost of water use
awarded a solid waste contract under through fees and requirements on utility rate
organized collection. The local unit of structures. As a result, many water users are
government would have to "buy out" a choosing to obtain all or portions of their
contractor in the future to change providers, water from wells they place on their own
even if their services were no longer the property. This creates risks to public health
lowest bid. It also creates an incentive for and safety, can affect the surrounding
bidders under organized collection to submit environment, can affect city water supplies,
high bids, as they would be eligible for and can leave city water utilities with
damages if they fail to win without having to massive losses of customer load and rate
provide service. Furthermore, this is a revenue. The Minnesota Department of
precedent that, if applied to other Health (MDH) has claimed that cities have
government purchasing and service
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 15
no authority to prevent private wells from land uses that may be hazardous to the
being installed and operated. operational safety of aircraft using the public
airport, and to protect the safety and
Though MDH emphatically disagrees that property of people on the ground in the area
cities have the authority to prohibit private near the public airport.
wells by ordinance in the city boundaries,
state law and case law find otherwise. While some of the provisions included in the
MDH's position is out of line with long Minnesota Rules are required by the Federal
standing statutory city police power and Aviation Administration (FAA), other
zoning power. Case law finds such authority provisions go well beyond the federal
essential to protect the public health and requirements. In some cases, the Minnesota
safety. Providing clean, safe drinking water Rules do not make sense for the community
to citizens is an essential service provided served by a public airport.
by 726 active municipal water systems.
MDH ties cities hands by refusing to Response: The League of Minnesota
recognize that cities must protect the public Cities supports efforts to protect the
water supplies from numerous private wells safety and property of people living and
in city boundaries. Private wells in a city working near public airports. The League
increase the risk of contaminating public also recognizes that the Minnesota Rules
water supplies and encourages over use of related to public airport zoning standards
water. Cities have the authority to regulate exceed the FAA's and other states'
and even prohibit private wells by local standards and, thus, needlessly infringe
ordinance. on local control. The League supports
changes to Minnesota Rules pertaining to
Response: The League of Minnesota airport zoning standards that will more
Cities supports current law that closely align Minnesota's Rules with those
authorizes cities to protect public health in other states, while at the same time
and safety through local controls retaining local authority to be more
regulating or prohibiting private wells restrictive than the Minnesota Rules.
being placed within municipal water
utility service boundaries and would SD-26. Sustainable Development
oppose any changes to law to remove that
authority. Issue: Minnesota cities spend significant
time and resources planning for growth,
SD-25. Airport Safety Zones development, and redevelopment that will
best serve the future needs of their residents.
Issue: The field of aeronautics is regulated Numerous factors are considered as part of
generally by Minn. Stat. ch. 360 and Chapter that process, but an area of increasing
8800 of the Minnesota Rules. Land use interest involves concepts often categorized
safety zones and other public airport zoning as "sustainable development." Minn, Stat. §
standards are established in Minnesota Rules 4A.07, subd.l(b) defines this term, as it
Chapter 8800.2400, and are adopted by local pertains to local government, to mean
airport zoning regulations that are submitted "development that maintains or enhances
to the Minnesota Department of economic opportunity and community well-
Transportation (MnDOT) commissioner for being while protecting and restoring the
review and approval before adoption. natural environment upon which people and
Airport safety zones are intended to restrict economies depend. Sustainable
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 16
development meets the needs of the present generations to address, and is a more
without compromising the ability of future desirable home for residents and businesses.
generations to meet their own needs."
Response: The League of Minnesota
Cities play a key role in fostering Cities supports federal, state, and
sustainable development and other regional efforts to promote sustainable
conservation practices due to their role in development where the effectiveness of
land use planning and zoning, stormwater the proposed practice is supported by
and wastewater management, and local sound science, and as long as those efforts
economic development. Local governments do not supersede the authority of local
can take a lead on these issues by choosing governments to determine their own
to incorporate aspects of sustainable policies regarding land use and related
development into their local operations and issues.
facilities. They can also develop local
policies and regulations that support and Providing technical assistance and
guide individual and private sustainability financial incentives, and streamlining
efforts. The ability of a city to affect these regulations to encourage local
changes can, however, be restricted by governments and private property owners
policies and requirements imposed by other to engage in sustainable development
levels of government. practices, as well as assisting in education
and information efforts for the building
Sustainable development initiatives can industry and the public, are the best
cover a wide range of issues, but share the means to generate successful results.
benefit of lessening the future environmental These programs should focus on
impacts of communities on the land, air, and outcomes, allowing flexibility in how to
water in their area. Lakes, streams, rivers, best meet those outcomes in different
wetlands, wildlife habitat, shoreland areas, locations and situations. The League
and other natural resources can be protected opposes mandates that limit the authority
and enhanced in quality through local of cities to determine what practices will
efforts. Energy efficiency and renewable best meet the needs of their communities.
energy production reduce the energy
demands of a community and the The League supports sustainable
environmental impacts of energy development efforts that meet the above
production. By more efficiently using public criteria, including programs proposed in
infrastructure and minimizing resource the following areas:
consumption, the costs to individuals,
business, and government can be reduced. a) Shifting public resources, services,
New and expanded business and job investments, purchasing power,
opportunities are also generated by the and procurement toward more
"green" products and services needed to economically and environmentally
implement sustainable development sustainable outcomes where those
initiatives. The ideal result of well-planned solutions are cost effective and
sustainability, natural resources appropriate.
management, and conservation efforts is a b) Using local land-use planning and
city that is more efficient in the use of its zoning to protect and enhance
resources and infrastructure, creates fewer limited natural resources, and
environmental problems for future reduce the impacts of growth and
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 17
development on local approved an exemption from the state
infrastructure. building code and that did not adopt the
c) Promoting efficient and renewable code before Jan. 1, 2008. Many greater
energy sources. Minnesota cities have adopted the State
d) Encouraging sustainable building Building Code, and all cities within the
design, construction, and seven-county metropolitan area are required
operation strategies focused on to enforce the State Building Code.
integrated design, energy
efficiency, water conservation, Disputes concerning code development have
stormwater management, waste led to efforts to either repeal the
reduction, pollution prevention, International Mechanical Code or create a
indoor environmental quality, and new board with the authority to adopt,
the use of low-impact building administer, interpret, and enforce
materials and products. mechanical codes in Minnesota. Such
e) Supporting sustainable economic proposals undercut efforts to adopt a single
development, such as brownfield set of compatible codes, which help provide
clean-up, on-site stormwater for more efficient compliance,
management, and sustainable administration, and enforcement of
business practices and construction regulations.
technologies.
f� Assisting and recognizing local While a single set of coordinated codes
governments that take actions to helps provide consistency in code
reduce greenhouse gas emissions administration and enforcement,
and increase energy efficiency by implementation of sustainable building
providing and identifying technical design, construction, and operation does not
assistance, financial assistance, readily integrate with the existing state
and best practices. building and energy code system. As a
result, many cities are interested in adopting
SD-27 Construction Codes more aggressive local standards for
sustainable development and conservation.
Issue: The State Building Code is the
statewide standard for the construction, Finally, the Legislature has directed the state
reconstruction, alteration, and repair of the Construction Codes and Licensing Division
buildings and other structures of the type to develop competency criteria and
governed by the code. A building code continuing education requirements far all
provides many benefits, including construction code inspectors. While the
uniformity of construction standards in the Legislature supports greater training and
building industry, consistency in code education requirements for local code
interpretation and enforcement, and life- officials, it has, at the same time, redirected
safety guidance. excess building permit surcharge dollars into
the general fund to help balance the state's
While all cities must enforce certain codes— budget rather than making these funds
such as the accessibility code and the available for code related research and
bleacher safety code—enforcement of the training.
state's building code remains a local option
for cities under 2,500 population in a non- Response: A statewide-enforced building
metropolitan county where voters have code may have benefits, but requiring it
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 18
would result in an unfunded mandate. Finally, the state should collaborate with
The enforcement of a building code can local governments, construction industry
be cost prohibitive for many cities due to representatives, and other stakeholders to
the expenses and overhead related to review the building and energy codes and
staffing versus the limited building consider modifications to encourage
activity occurring in some communities. sustainable building design, construction,
and operation. Specifically:
The League of Minnesota Cities supports
a statewide building code as long as there a) For purposes of federal conformity,
is not mandatory enforcement at the local the state should adopt the
level. Enforcing the state building code International Energy Conservation
should remain a local option for Code as part of the State Building
municipalities under 2,500 population in Code.
a non-metropolitan county where voters b) The state should include the
have approved an exemption from the International Green Construction
State Building Code and that did not Code as an `optional appendix' to the
adopt the code before Jan. 1, 2008, unless State Building Code to allow cities to
the state fully funds the costs of utilize appropriate parts of those
enforcement and inspection services guidelines in their communities.
necessary to enforce a statewide building c) The state should develop components
code. If the Legislature requires all cities in the building inspector training
to enforce the state building code, local program to ensure inspectors are
governments must have the option to hire familiar with these practices and
or select a building offcial of their choice technologies.
and set the appropriate level of service— d) The Legislature should authorize
even if the state fully funds code cities to experiment with more
enforcement activities. aggressive local standards for
sustainable development and
Cities that enforce the State Building conservation that will help inform the
Code endeavor to provide quality code state code development process.
administration and enforcement. The
League supports the development of SD-28. Residential Sprinkler
coordinated construction codes and Requirements
additional enforcement tools that help
local officials efficiently administer and Issue: The International Code Council
enforce construction regulations to (ICC) voted to add a fire sprinkler provision
protect the health and safety of citizens in to its 2009 International Residential Code
their jurisdictions. (IRC). This provision will require fire
sprinkling in all newly constructed one and
The League urges the state to make two family homes and townhouses. Since
surplus revenue from the building permit Minnesota amends and adopts the ICC codes
surcharge available to local governments to form the Minnesota State Building Code,
to help defray the cost of complying with the state will review the fire sprinkler
code official training and education provision for possible inclusion when it
requirements. adopts the IRC in 2012.
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 19
Response: If adopted, the new fire Response: The Legislature should clarify
sprinkler requirements will have an that cities are authorized to adopt rental
impact on cities and Minnesota residents. housing licensing requirements that
This is a multifaceted issue and needs to mandate rental housing owners and
be thoroughly discussed through the managers mitigate disturbances by
Department of Labor and Industry (DLI) tenants whose disruptive actions are
code adoption process. More information detrimental to other tenants or the
and outreach is needed to educate cities surrounding neighborhood and recover
and their residents on the sprinkler reasonable city costs associated with
requirement. providing additional assistance along with
provisional licensing requirements.
During the adoption process, DLI and
stakeholders should discuss and take into SD-30. Disability Access
consideration the need to train building Requirements
officials to inspect sprinklers, the
potential burden on a city's water supply, Issue: Title II of the Americans with
effect on a city's fire suppression rating, Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 requires that
impact on insurance premiums, and state and local governments provide people
impact on the current standards for with disabilities equal opportunity to benefit
construction materials and sprinklers. from all of their programs, services, and
activities. Public entities are not required to
SD-29. City Rental Housing take actions that would result in significant
Licensing financial and administrative burdens, but
they must modify policies, practices, and
Issue: Evidence exists in some communities procedures to avoid discrimination unless
that problem rental properties consume a they can demonstrate that doing so would
disproportionate amount of city resources fundamentally alter the nature of the service,
and negatively impact the safety of other program, or activity being provided.
tenants, the neighborhood, and property
values of neighbors. State and local governments are also
required to follow specific standards when
Cities face circumstances in which constructing new facilities and altering
consumption of public resources in response existing public buildings, and they must
to repeated calls for emergency response to relocate programs or otherwise provide
incidents that take place on residential rental access in inaccessible older buildings. Under
property cause serious policing and budget the ADA, public entities are not necessarily
issues. While cities agree that tenants required to make each existing facility
should not be penalized for calling the accessible. However, their programs—when
police, current state law should be clarified viewed in their entirety—must be readily
to allow cities to take effective action to accessible to people with disabilities. A
obtain cooperation of the owner or manager public entity may achieve program
of the rental property that demands accessibility through various methods. For
significant public resources. In many example, a city may alter existing facilities,
instances, repeated police calls may indicate acquire or construct new facilities, relocate a
an inattentive property owner or property service or program to an accessible facility,
management company. or provide services at other accessible sites.
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 20
One district court judge has taken an inconsistencies in the law's treatment of
expansive view of disability access different kinds of properties have caused
requirements for public recreation facilities. confusion about how the law applies to
The case involved a parent who sued a city multi-use facilities, such as municipal ice
due to difficulty viewing soccer and baseball arenas used for school-sponsored programs.
games on certain city fields. The court, in The recent shooting in the Morrison County
interpreting the Minnesota Human Rights Government Center also shows the harm
Act (MHRA), held that any public facility is that can result from preventing local control
a public service. Since the MHRA requires of their own facilities.
that every public service be accessible to
disabled persons, the court concluded that Further, the law gives private property
each and every playing field and other owners the right to prohibit guns in their
public facility must be fully accessible. The establishments, but prohibits landowners
court rejected the ADA's limitations on from restricting firearm possession by
modifications for physical access to older tenants and their guests without
facilities, as well as the ADA's "when distinguishing between residential and
viewed in its entirety" language for program commercial properties. This creates
access. The result is a more restrictive state confusion for shopping malls and other retail
standard for physical access to public properties with large common areas that are
facilities than required by the ADA and the not occupied by the tenants but which the
State Building Code. tenants and their customers must cross to
access the tenant's space.
Response: The League of Minnesota
Cities supports changes to the MHRA Response: The League of Minnesota
that will make state accessibility Cities requests an amendment to the
standards compatible with the federal Citizens Personal Protection Act that
ADA for public services and facilities. would allow cities to prohibit handguns in
The Legislature should clarify that a city-owned buildings, facilities, and parks.
facility that is in compliance with The League is not seeking a repeal of the
handicap access provisions of the State Citizens Personal Protection Act, nor
Building Code meets the physical access authority to prohibit legal weapons in
requirements of the MHRA. State law parking lots or on city streets and
should also specify that access sidewalks. The League also supports
requirements apply to public programs efforts by commercial property owners to
and services as a whole, rather than to clarify that the prohibition on restricting
each individual aspect of a public possession by tenants and their guests
program or service. applies only to residential rental property.
SD-31. Restrictions on Possession of SD-32. Creating a Minnesota GIS
Firearms
Issue: Cities recognize geographic
Issue: The Minnesota Citizens Personal information systems (GIS) as an essential
Protection Act, also known as "conceal-and- tool for comprehensive land use, real estate,
carry," prohibits guns on most school environmental, law enforcement and other
properties but forbids other local units of management and planning information.
government from prohibiting loaded Barriers to GIS development continue where
firearms on their properties. The maintenance of official land records has not
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 21
been fully automated. In addition, the GIS At the federal level, the Federal
start-up costs can be prohibitive. Cities and Communications Commission (FCC} has
counties have increasingly found more ordered reservation of 700 MHz wireless
opportunities to cooperate in developing spectrum for a national interoperable
applications for use of GIS at the localleveL broadband network to meet public safety
communications needs. But no successful
Response: The Legislature should proposal for development of such public
encourage implementation of GIS at the safety uses has yet been forthcoming.
local level through grants and an
exemption from the state sales tax for Response: The League of Minnesota
capital equipment and from levy limits Cities supports continued and increased
for costs associated with such activities. In state financing of substantial local costs to
addition, cities should be involved in the participate in ARMER, including the
development of county land records acquisition and modernization of
modernization plans. subscriber equipment, such as portable
and mobile radios required for ARMER
SD-33. Public Safety users. The League also opposes efforts to
Communications divert dedicated ARMER funds to the
state's general fund. The Legislature
Issue: The state role in financing public should fund regional cooperation and
safety communications has important cost partnerships for effective delivery of 911
implications for cities. The state needs to service, training and use of ARMER.
accept financial responsibility for use by
cities of the state public safety radio The League also urges the FCC to
communications backbone. Cities have continue to support availability of
struggled to pay high expenses to participate wireless spectrum necessary to expand
in the 800 MHz statewide public safety channel capacity that allows local public
system. safety agencies to meet future needs of
cities and other local units of government.
In previous state budgets, the Legislature
turned to revenue sources upon which cities SD-34. CriMNet
depend to cover costs to purchase and
operate new communications technology Issue: Public safety is compromised by the
and hardware for computer-aided dispatch, lack of centralized, complete, and accurate
911 public safety answering points (PSAPs), criminal history data about individuals,
and interoperable radio communications incidents, and cases. Without an integrated
equipment and subsystems in order to criminal justice information system,
finance the build-out of the state backbone Minnesota cannot always hold serious
for the new system. As a result, fees were criminals accountable for their crimes.
directed to fund revenue bond debt service CriMNet, Minnesota's effort to integrate the
used to complete the statewide build-out of 1,100 criminal justice information systems
the Allied Radio Matrix for Emergency operated by agencies at all levels, will
Response (ARMER) and the cost of improve access to relevant criminal history
operations of the state public safety radio data for public safety and criminal justice
communications backbone. authorities.
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 22
City officials are well aware of the complex data. However, data practices policies
issues raised by the utilization of electronic should not create new, unfunded
record keeping, data sharing, and access to mandates for local units of government or
records that identify data subjects. The compromise CriMNet's usefulness to the
League of Minnesota Cities recognizes that criminal justice system by creating
one of the challenges in making CriMNet unnecessary barriers. CriMNet
operational is meeting the requirements of stakeholders and participating users at
the Minnesota Government Data Practices the local level should be involved in
Act (MGDPA). crafting any legislation that would govern
data practices requirements for CriMNet.
More than 500 cities operate police
departments. These departments vary SD-35. Pawn Shop Regulation and
dramatically in fiscal capacity, staffing Use of the Automated Pawn System
resources, and technical expertise. Further, (APS)
each municipal law enforcement agency has
unique operating procedures, strengths, and Issue: Minn. Stat. ch. 325J enables licensure
needs based on the community it serves. The for pawnbrokers and provides statewide
League knows CriMNet will have a minimum regulations for the pawn industry.
significant impact on municipal police Specifically, the law:
business practices, and could mean
increased staffing needs, training, and a) Requires pawnbrokers to record all
equipment purchases. The League also transactions, including details of the
recognizes that every agency must item pawned or sold, information
participate fully in CriMNet to make the about the customer and the cost of
system effective. the transaction.
b) Requires pawnbrokers to maintain
Response: The League of Minnesota records of all transactions for three
Cities supports efforts by the state to years, and to make records available
integrate criminal justice information upon request to law enforcement
systems. The League also supports agencies.
cooperation between legislators, law c) Allows pawnbrokers to charge a
enforcement and corrections agents, court maximum monthly interest rate of 3
officials, prosecutors, community groups, percent of the principal amount
and businesses that build public support loaned in a transaction, plus a
for CriMNet. reasonable fee for storage and
If CriMNet is to be implemented services.
statewide, the Legislature must consider The Automated Pawn System (APS), a
the different capacities of municipalities computerized system for tracking and
to participate. The League requests that monitoring pawn transactions, was launched
the Legislature fund CriMNet planning by the city of Minneapolis in 1997 and made
and implementation at the local level. available to other municipalities after Minn.
To ensure compliance with the MGDPA, Stat. ch. 325J was enacted. The purpose of
comprehensive guidelines and operational the APS is to provide a tool to verify
practices should be implemented to compliance with current law, to help
safeguard access to and use of CriMNet identify and minimize illegal activity, to
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 23
recover stolen property, and to provide a Response: The League of Minnesota
legitimate environment for consumers. Cities supports the authority of cities to
Currently, almost 180 municipal law regulate and license pawnbrokers, and
enforcement agencies participate in the APS opposes any legislation that would remove
system as either a"query only" or the authority of local governments to
"contributing" member. enact more restrictive regulations than
currently exist in Minn. Stat. ch. 325J.
All access to and use of information in the
APS system is governed by the Minnesota The League supports the authority of
Data Practices Act. Only authorized users cities to set licensing and transaction fees
have access to the data. There is no public that would enable them to recover their
access to the data. Further, data that would full regulatory and enforcement expenses.
reveal the identity of persons who are
customers of a licensed pawnbroker or The League supports cooperation
secondhand goods dealer are private data on between law enforcement agencies and
individuals and only used for law the pawn industry that enhances the
enforcement purposes. Data describing the ability to identify illegal activity and
property in a regulated transaction with a recover stolen property. Access to
licensed pawnbroker or secondhand goods transaction information by law
dealer is public. enforcement agencies is vital to
accomplishing this goal. Further, the
Original pawn and secondhand transactions sharing of information through the use of
reported to the APS carry a$1 fee, the APS is a proactive way to prevent
regardless of the number of items involved. property and other crimes.
All subsequent updates or corrections to
transactions are processed without charge. SD-36. Compensation and
Contributing jurisdictions may also add Reimbursement for Public Safety
regulatory costs to the transaction fee. The ServiCes
total transaction fee is then typically
assessed by the dealer to the customer. Issue: Municipal public safety personnel
often respond to emergencies involving non-
A bill that would weaken Minn. Stat. ch. residents. For example, municipal fire,
325J and restrict the use of the APS has police, and/or ambulance services may be
been introduced in the Minnesota dispatched to the scene of a traffic accident
Legislature. Specifically, the legislation on an interstate highway involving victims
would forbid law enforcement agents from from other cities or states. Although cities
acquiring customer information from pawn can bill for some public safety services they
and secondhand shops until they have provide to non-residents, they have limited
probable cause to do so, and would authority to collect on unpaid bills.
eliminate the authority of local units of
government to more strictly regulate pawn Cities have also found that auto insurance
and secondhand dealers. The legislation policies vary when it comes to coverage for
would also replace all current municipal emergency responses. Insurance companies
licensing fees with a$0.25 per transaction of those responsible for accidents sometimes
fee. deny payment for fire and ambulance
service.
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 24
Additionally, municipal public safety Insurance companies should be required
personnel commonly respond to to reimburse local governments for the
emergencies that require the provision of full cost of providing these emergency
medical services. The medical services medical services. Finally, auto and
provided by the city-employed first homeowners insurance policies should be
responders are part of a continuum of health required to insure for the cost of
care that is covered by insurance companies emergency medical responses.
when provided by paramedics and other
medical care providers; however, insurance SD-37 Administrative Traffic
policies vary when it comes to coverage for Citatlons
municipally provided medical services.
Insurance companies of those treated by Issue: Cities have implemented
municipal public safety personnel frequently administrative enforcement programs for
deny payment for emergency medical violations of local regulatory ordinances,
services when they are billed by a such as building codes, zoning codes, health
municipality. codes, and public nuisance ordinances. This
use of administrative proceedings has kept
Thus, when a municipal public safety enforcement at the local level and reduced
agency provides first response medical pressure on over-burdened district court
assistance, they commonly do so at the systems.
expense of local property taxpayers. While
emergency responses are legitimate The Legislature has repeatedly increased the
functions of municipal public safety fine surcharge on district court cases to
departments, the costs of providing services generate revenues for the state's general
to non-residents should not be borne by the fund. The surcharge—the amount paid over
community's taxpayers. and above the fine—is now $75 per citation.
The growth in the surcharge has
Response: Cities should be compensated dramatically increased the cost of citations
for emergency responses they provide to and has caused some to question whether the
non-residents. They should have the total of the fine and surcharge is
authority to bill for the full cost of fire disproportionate for minor matters. To lower
and ambulance services they provide, and the amount imposed on their residents, a
to collect on unpaid bills. Finally, auto number of cities have expanded their
insurance policies should be required to administrative programs to include some
insure for the cost of emergency offenses traditionally heard in district court,
responses. such as minor traffic offenses.
Further, while emergency medical The increased state surcharges have not been
responses are legitimate functions of used to assist local units of government with
municipal public safety departments, the the growing costs of enforcement and
costs of providing emergency medical prosecution. No matter which entity�ity,
care to individuals should be covered by county or state—issues a statutory citation,
insurance and not be borne exclusively by the violator pays between $115 and $127 for
the community's taxpayers. Cities should a minor speeding violation. Of this amount,
have the authority to bill for the full cost the city receives between $13 and $20, and
of first responder medical services they the county receives just slightly more.
provide and to collect on unpaid bills.
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 25
Further, when a violator requests relief from SD-38. Juveniles in Municipal Jails
paying the full amount of the fine and
surcharge, the courts have been more Issue: Municipal jails have long served as
inclined to waive the fine than to reduce the holding facilities for suspects who are being
surcharge. When this occurs, the local units questioned and/or booked, and for those
of government recover no costs even though awaiting transfer to a county jail or juvenile
the city has incurred expenses. detention facility. In 2012, the Minnesota
Department of Corrections (DOC) issued a
In 2009, the Legislature amended the reinterpretation of an existing law to say
statutes to allow administrative fines to be that, "[W]here counties have secure juvenile
issued for certain minar traffic offenses. correctional facilities...juveniles are not
Cities report that the short list of offenses allowed to be held in jail and/or municipal
noted in that law change does not adequately lock-ups for any length of time."
address the needs of local law enforcement.
Additional authority is necessary to allow This interpretation is in conflict with a
law enforcement officers to implement an provision in Minn. Stat. § 260B.181, subd.
effective program to reduce violations. 4, which provides that juveniles can be held
in a licensed juvenile facility for up to six
Response: The League of Minnesota hours. Many municipal jails, including
Cities continues to support the use of city those in counties where juvenile detention
administrative fines for local regulatory facilities exist, have been operating under
ordinances, such as building codes, zoning the six-hour holding law.
codes, health codes, public nuisance
ordinances and regulatory matters that Managers of municipal jails indicate the
are not duplicative of misdemeanor or reinterpretation of the law is contrary to
higher level state traffic and criminal common practice and presents significant
offenses. Cities should have the authority challenges for municipal law enforcement
to issue administrative citations for low- personneL
level moving and equipment violations
that: 1) would otherwise result in Response: The League of Minnesota
warnings, and 2) occur on roadways Cities supports a statutory clarification
where the speed limit is 45 miles per hour that would allow juveniles to be held for
or less. Further, the League endorses the questioning and booking in licensed jail
concept that, if the recipient of an facilities for up to six hours, regardless of
administrative penalty wishes to appeal whether the county has a juvenile
the issuance of an administrative fine for detention facility.
a violation before a disinterested third
party, the party may opt to be issued a SD-39. Justice System Funding
standard traffic citation and appeal its
issuance before the district court. Issue: Over the past several years,
Minnesota's justice system has operated
If state leaders choose not to expand the under consecutive budget shortfalls.
list of administrative traffc offenses, they According to the Minnesota Judicial Branch,
should then change the distribution of currently the court system is operating nine
statutory violation fine revenues so that percent short-staffed, has a hiring freeze,
cities are adequately compensated for and has a hold on filling some judge
enforcement and prosecution costs. vacancies. Public service windows are
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 26
closed part of each week in many SD-40. Homeland Security Costs
courthouses. Delays in case filings, hearings and Liability
and dispositions are building throughout the
state as staff and judges struggle to keep up Issue: The federal government's response to
with caseloads. The budget shortfalls limit terrorism has resulted in new responsibilities
the ability of the courts to process cases for local governments in a number of areas.
pertaining to shoplifting, trespassing, For example, shortly after the terrorist
worthless checks, traffic and ordinance attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, the federal
violations, juvenile truancy, runaways and government tapped local law enforcement
underage drinking, consumer credit disputes, personnel to provide security and perform
property-related and small civil claims, and screening at our nation's airports. These new
many other cases. Timely processing of responsibilities increase cities' liability
these cases is critical to keeping exposure and result in higher local costs for
communities safe and to preserving the public safety services. In addition, local
quality of life residents expect. governments are expected to continue
emergency planning and capacity building
The State Court Administrator has efforts, provide additional training and
advocated for statutory changes that some equipment for first responders, and improve
believe would result in efficiencies and cost emergency response coordination and
savings while preserving core services. communication.
These changes involve consolidating
services where practicable and using As partners in protecting our country from
technology to reduce costs. They include terrorism, the federal government must: 1)
centralized payable processing, use of e- provide greater direct financial support for
citations and restructuring of state mandated our first responders; 2) maintain funding for
programs. general pre- and post-disaster emergency
management programs; and 3) ensure a
Response: The League of Minnesota coordinated and effective national
Cities supports a statement by former emergency response system.
Chief Justice Eric J. Magnuson that calls
for "an adequately funded, functioning Response: The League of Minnesota
justice system that resolves disputes Cities recommends that when the federal
promptly in order to ensure the rule of government requires or contracts for
law, protect public safety and individual cities' assistance in meeting federal
rights and promote a civil society." The homeland security responsibilities, the
League supports the use of technology to federal government should fully cover the
reduce costs and preserve services. The costs, including the risk of liability arising
League opposes any changes that would from these activities.
decriminalize local ordinances, petty
misdemeanors or misdemeanor offenses, The League supports greater federal
or that would make prosecution of these funding to prepare, train, and equip our
crimes more difficult. first responders. The League also support
changes in the federal funding process to
ensure Department of Homeland Security
funds move quickly to the local level.
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 27
SD-41. Immigration Reform relationships between local government
officials, including law enforcement
Issue: The United States and the State of personnel, and immigrant communities.
Minnesota have long traditions of
welcoming immigrants. Immigrants SD-42. Racial Profiling
strengthen Minnesota by contributing to the
state's economy, enhancing cultural Issue: The League of Minnesota Cities
resources, and participating in efforts to recognizes that where profiling by law
build strong communities. enforcement officials exists, it must be
eliminated. The League supports action by
According to the National League of Cities, the State of Minnesota to fund and
roughly 35 percent of undocumented implement effective and meaningful
immigrants have lived in the United States responses to racial profiling that will
for 10 years or more. Approximately 1.6 effectuate fair treatment of all people
million undocumented immigrants are regardless of age, race or ethnicity.
children, and another 3.1 million children in
the United States have at least one Response: The League of Minnesota
undocumented parent. These families are Cities supports efforts to ensure that all
forced to live "underground" and are unable interventions initiated by law
to get drivers' licenses or car insurance in enforcement officials be based on an
most states. In addition, they are unlikely to objective demonstration of probable
obtain health insurance and are afraid to cause to believe that a law has been
report crimes to local law enforcement. violated. A law enforcement official's
decision to stop, question or detain
Since immigrants are barred from most individuals will be based solely on a
federal public assistance, the burden,of reasonable suspicion of illegal activity and
providing social services, education, and without consideration of age, race or
health care falls to state and local ethnicity. The League supports training
governments that are increasingly feeling programs to support these goals and
the financial impact of both legal and illegal recommends that the state develop, fund,
immigrants living in their communities. and present such training programs to all
law enforcement agencies in the state.
Response: The League of Minnesota
Cities, together with the National League The League supports objective, well-
of Cities, urges Congress to move quickly formulated statistical sampling by third
to enact and enforce effective parties under the auspices of a state-
immigration laws. funded study to document and analyze
law enforcement interventions, coupled
Federal and state governments must not with an effective means to sanction any
transfer responsibility for enforcing U.S. documented instances of inappropriate
immigration laws to local personnel, treatment of citizens. Additionally, the
including police officers, firefighters, League supports state funding for video
educators, health professionals, and social cameras in police cars as an incentive for
service employees. Finally, federal and voluntary local participation in data
state governments must not prohibit local collection efforts aimed at identifying
units of government from implementing patterns of profiling.
policies aimed at fostering positive
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 28
SD-43. Legalization of Fireworks complies with National Fire Protection
Association (NFPA) Standard 1124. The
Issue: In 2002, the state enacted a law NFPA is a private international association
allowing the sale and use of non-aerial, non- of individuals and trade and professional
explosive consumer fireworks, including organizations. (NFPA Standard 1124 is not a
sparklers, party poppers, snakes, and other public document and is available only for a
novelty items—relaxing the ban on fee.)
consumer fireworks in place in Minnesota
since 1941. In 2008, the Legislature further Fireworks products can cause serious
relaxed the ban by increasing the amount of injuries and fire loss. The legal sale of
explosive material allowed in legal consumer fireworks undermines fire
fireworks. prevention efforts. The sale and use of
consumer fireworks increases local public
Local fire service professionals have safety enforcement, emergency response,
reported that consumers and law and fire-suppression costs.
enforcement personnel have had difficulty
distinguishing between legal and illegal Response: The League of Minnesota
fireworks, and that the 20021aw resulted in Cities opposes legislation that would
greater use in Minnesota of illegal fireworks further relax the ban on the sale and use
purchased in other states. of consumer fireworks. The League
supports a repeal of the 2002 law that
According to data provided by the relaxes the ban on the sale and use of
Minnesota State Fire Marshal Division, consumer fireworks.
injury trends and dollar losses related to
fireworks incidents surged after the Fees are needed to cover the costs
consumer fireworks ban was lifted. Hospital associated with compliance checks,
reports reveal that the annual number of education, and inspections relating to the
injuries caused by fireworks rose sale of a regulated product. The current
dramatically in 2002 and remains elevated. fee caps do not allow cities to recover
Likewise, Minnesota Fire Incident these costs. The League supports allowing
Reporting System records show that the cities to establish and impose reasonable
annual dollar loss resulting from fireworks fees on retailers that sell fireworks. The
incidents increased significantly in 2002 and League opposes restrictions on requiring
has since grown. fireworks retailers to purchase additional
liability insurance. Finally, the League
In 2003, the state enacted a number of seeks repeal of the NFPA reference.
provisions limiting local authority pertaining
to fireworks sales. The 2003 law caps the SD-44. Traffic Enforcement
allowable municipal permit fee at $100 per Cameras
vendor selling fireworks with other
products, and $350 per vendor selling Issue: Drivers who disobey traffic laws can
fireworks exclusively. The law restricts cause serious traffic accidents and contribute
cities from requiring fireworks sellers to to gridlock. In spite of the severity of this
purchase additional liability insurance. problem, cities cannot always afford the
Finally, the 2003 law states that cities cannot levels of peace officer enforcement that
prohibit or restrict the display of consumer residents demand. The technology exists to
fireworks if the display and structure enforce traffic laws with photographic
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 29
evidence. For example, there is less running Response: State law should limit
of red lights when motions imaging operation of motorized foot scooters to
recording systems (MIRS) are installed at roadways with speed limits of 30 miles
traffic signals. per hour or less. State law should require
motorized foot scooter operators between
Response: Local law enforcement agencies the ages of 12 and 18 to obtain an
should have the express authority to use operator's permit by successfully
photo enforcement technology to enforce completing a state-administered
traffic laws. Local law enforcement motorized foot scooter safety program
officers should have the express authority modeled after the watercraft safety
to issue citations for traffic violations by program. In addition, state law should
mail where the violation is detected with allow local units of government to be
photographic evidence. more restrictive in regulating the
operation of motorized foot scooters, and
SD-45. Operation of Motorized should provide explicit authority to
Foot SCOOteI'S regulate hours of use.
Issue: Current state statute pre-empts the SD-46. Methamphetamine
authority of local units of government to
regulate the operation of motorized foot Issue: The production and abuse of
scooters. The law provides that an operator methamphetamine (meth) continues to be a
must be 12 years of age or older. Although problem for communities across Minnesota.
the law contains safety provisions, including Cities are facing serious issues pertaining to
a requirement that operators under the age of ineth, including costly cleanup of drug labs,
18 must wear helmets, it does not require and the social problems and public safety
training or permits for operators of any age. issues resulting from meth abuse. To meet
Further, it does not explicitly restrict the the challenges presented by the growing
operation of motorized foot scooters to low- meth problem, cities are working with
volume and/or low-speed roadways. retailers to monitor the sale of precursor
ingredients, and are coordinating with other
Use of motorized equipment on roadways is units of government on the impact on
inherently more dangerous than the use of communities.
non-motorized bicycles and is comparable to
the operation of motorized watercraft. While Response: The Legislature and state
the law governing watercraft operation also agencies must:
requires an operator to be at least 12 years of
age, Minn. Stat. § 86B.101 requires a) Provide sufficient funding to assist
watercraft operators between the ages of 12 local units of government with
and 18 to successfully complete a youth cleanup of drug labs.
watercraft safety program and to obtain a b) Allow local governments to be
watercraft operator's permit. The youth more restrictive in the
watercraft safety program is administered by development of ordinances at the
the state, and includes a personal watercraft city and county level to
educational course and a testing program appropriately address the needs of
that emphasizes safe and legal operation. their communities.
c) Support public education on
methamphetamine, including
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 30
information to local government than in the states immediately surrounding
officials, retailers, schools, and it.
health care providers.
d) Provide training, equipment, Response: The League of Minnesota
standards, and support sufficient Cities supports strengthening the current
to allow local law enforcement and statutory prohibition on drug
other responders to safely perform paraphernalia, including improving the
their duties. statutory definition of "drug
paraphernalia" and explicitly prohibiting
SD Drug Paraphernalia sales.
Issue: Cities throughout the state struggle SD-48 Regulation of Massage
with local businesses selling items primarily Therapists
designed to enable illegal drug use. Current
state law only prohibits use, possession, Issue: The state does not currently license or
delivery, and advertisements of drug register massage therapists. Massage
paraphernalia. The law inadequately defines therapists are regulated under Minn. Stat. ch.
the term "drug paraphernalia," and leaves 146A, which identifies prohibited provider
cities to pass more effective ordinances conduct and authorizes the Department of
"prohibiting or otherwise regulating the Health to take disciplinary action against
manufacture, delivery, possession, or noncompliant providers. However, funds for
advertisement of drug paraphernalia." these purposes have been limited.
Many cities have adopted their own In order to control prostitution and to
ordinances to regulate drug paraphernalia, provide for health and sanitation standards,
including specifically prohibiting sales. But several cities have entered the traditional
for a variety of reasons, business owners state domain of health-care licensure by
routinely challenge these ordinances as enacting ordinances that require all massage
unconstitutional and then successfully therapists to obtain a local professional
invoke virulent public outcry on that basis. license. These ordinances help local law
This experience—along with costly court enforcement officers to differentiate
challenges�liscourages other cities from between legitimate providers and
taking similar steps to curb illegal drug prostitution businesses fronting as massage
activity, and leaves most cities only able to therapy establishments.
enforce an inadequate state law.
Response: The League of Minnesota
Most states immediately around Minnesota Cities supports the statewide registration
define "drug paraphernalia" in a detailed or licensure of massage therapists in
way based on a 1979 model federal law order to aid local law enforcement efforts
designed to avoid constitutional issues. to control prostitution and other criminal
Minnesota does not. Federal law and the law activity. The League opposes legislation
of half the states immediately around that would pre-empt the ability of cities to
Minnesota explicitly ban sales of drug regulate massage therapy establishments,
paraphernalia, but Minnesota does not. The except that cities should not have the
current state of the law arguably makes drug authority to require local licensing for
paraphernalia easier to obtain in Minnesota individual massage therapists working
under the direction of a licensed medical
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 31
professional. The League supports the more apt to ignore local regulations (such as
provision in Minn. Stat. ch. 146A and spending the required percentage of lawful
calls for legislation that would allow cities gambling expenditures in the city's trade
to prosecute violations of Minn. Stat. ch. area) if they don't need the city's approval
146A. for the renewal of their state-issued premises
permits.
The League also supports legislation
pertaining to the practice of massage Response: The licensee should be required
therapy that accomplishes the following: to obtain local approval on an annual
basis, or at longer intervals as determined
a) Helps cities establish legitimacy of by the city, and file the resolution of local
providers applying for a local approval with the Gambling Control
license to practice Board.
b) Prevents individuals from
conducting criminal activities such SD-50. Liquor Liability Insurance
as prostitution out of Llmlts
establishments operating as
massage therapy facilities Issue: Minn. Stat. § 340A.409 requires that
c) Improves provider compliance "no retail license may be issued, maintained
with Minn. Stat. ch. 146A or renewed unless the applicant
d) Protects the public from injury demonstrates proof of financial
and from other conditions that responsibility with regard to liability
may result in harm. imposed by Minn. Stat. § 340A.801 relating
to the sale of alcoholic beverages. The
SD-49. Lawful Gambling and Local minimum limits of liability currently in
Control statute, require 50,000 of coverage because
of bodily injury to any one person in any
Issue: As part of the 2009 reforms to lawful one occurrence, $100,000 because of bodily
gambling statutes, some local control was injury to two or more persons in any one
removed from the lawful gambling process. occurrence, $10,000 because of injury to or
Previously, the lawful gambling licensee destruction of property of others in any one
would have to obtain the city council's occurrence, $50,000 for loss of ineans of
approval as part of its application to renew support of any one person in any one
the organization's premises permit (some occurrence, $100,000 for loss of ineans of
forms of lawful gambling require obtaining support of two or more persons in any one
an organizational license and a premises occurrence, $50,000 for other pecuniary loss
permit(s) from the state). This step was of any one person in any one occurrence,
removed when the state established a and $100,000 for other pecuniary loss of two
perpetual organizational license and or more persons in any one occurrence.
premises permitting system. Because these These limits have not been updated since at
lieenses and permits are issued by the state, least 1985 and would provide very little
under the current system a city's authority relief to persons impacted by an intoxicated
over these licensees is limited to: 1) person. While cities can choose to require
approval of the initial premises permit; and higher limits of liability than required by
2) enforcement of the city's lawful gambling statute, it may create competitive imbalance
ordinance. Some city officials have between communities if the limits are not
concerns that gambling organizations will be consistent.
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 32
Response: The minimum limits in Minn. upon the liquor industry in the event of a
Stat. § 340A.409 should be increased to state shutdown as demonstrated in 2011.
$500,000 per occurrence with a $500,000
annual aggregate. Response: The Legislature should remove
the requirement of approval by the
SD-51. On-Sale Liquor or Wine commissioner for city-issued liquor
Licenses to Cultural Centers licenses and simply require cities to notify
the state of newly issued and renewed
Issue: Cultural centers are not one of the licenses as is already the case for
qualifying entities to which municipalities intoxicating on-sale liquor licenses and
may issue on-sale liquor or wine licenses. a113.2-liquor licenses.
Several cultural centers have received
special legislation that allows their SD-53. Conditions for Liquor
municipalities to issue on-sale liquor or wine Licenses
licenses to them. This practice interferes
with the ability of municipalities to control Issue: Cities have the ability to issue liquor
the placement and operating manner of these licenses in Minnesota as the lead policing
entities. In 2003, performing theaters were organization, etc. in urban areas. Minn. Stat.
added to the list of establishments to which § 340A.415 lists conditions under which a
municipalities may issue on-sale liquor or liquor license may be revoked or suspended,
wine licenses, and in 2011, auto speedways including failure to comply with "an
were included, but to date cultural centers applicable statute, rule or ardinance relating
have not been added. to alcoholic beverages." Therefore, cities
may clearly issue liquor licenses subject to
Response: The Legislature should terms and conditions provided in ordinance,
authorize municipalities to issue on-sale which if violated will result in revocation or
liquor or wine licenses to cultural centers, suspension. But cities also impose
subject to restrictions imposed by the conditions on individual licenses on a case
municipality. by case basis, both before issuing the
license, and, if further unforeseen issues of
SD-52. Wine and Off-Sale Licenses health, safety, or welfare arise out of a
particular licensee, after issuing the license.
Issue: Minn. Stat. ch. 340A authorizes cities
to issue liquor licenses to various A recent court of appeals decision denies a
establishments within their jurisdictions, but city has the ability to stipulate conditions on
in virtually all cases, the license issued by a local establishment's already-issued liquor
the city is not valid until the state approves license. See, In the Matter of the On-Sale
it. This is true for such commonly issued Liquor License, Class B Held by T. J.
licenses as wine, off-sale intoxicating liquor Management of Minneapolis d/b/a Gabby's
and temporary on-sale intoxicating liquor Saloon and Eatery, 763 N.W. 2d 359 (Minn.
licenses. The result is extra time spent for Ct. App. 2009). The opinion also brings into
city staff, as well as a time-based question the ability of a city to impose non-
commercial impact to the business pursuing ordinance provided conditions on an
the original license. It represents individual liquor license at the time of
unnecessary duplication of effort by the issuance.
state, and can be a severe economic burden
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 33
Response: The Legislature should alcohol to minors. The League supports
recognize a city's need to place conditions locally-determined alcohol compliance
on a liquor license in order to address check programs, but any state mandate
local circumstances and to better protect for alcohol compliance checks should
the public. Minn. Stat. § 340A.415 must come with state-supported funding
be changed so that reasonable conditions initiatives to support these locally-
may be imposed uniquely to a given determined compliance efforts. The
liquor licensee whether the license has Legislature should consider a grant
already issued or not and without passing program supporting locally-based
an ordinance laying out the terms and community partnerships that can quickly
conditions for that particular licensee. and effectively respond to youth access
problems.
SD-54. Youth Access to Alcohol and
Tobacco SD-55. Smoking Ban Ordinances
Issue: The minimum age to purchase Issue: The Legislature in 2007 voted to
alcohol in Minnesota is 21. The minimum extend the Clean Indoor Air Act to cover all
age to purchase tobacco in Minnesota is 18. workplaces, including restaurants and bars.
The minimum age to sell alcohol and The new law sets a floor with minimum
tobacco products in Minnesota is 18. The standards, and allows local governments to
penalty for a minor or underage person implement more restrictive ordinances.
using false identification is 90 days in jail
and/or up to $1,000. Cities have an interest Response: The Legislature should
in preventing youth from obtaining these preserve the ability of local governments
products. To this end, many cities operate to enact more restrictive ordinances.
compliance check programs in an effort to
discern the current level of youth access and SD-56. Environmental Protection
to reduce youth access. Statewide, a number
of cities have created community Issue: Cities demonstrate strong stewardship
partnerships with their court systems, local for the protection and preservation of the
businesses, and school districts to quickly environment. Minnesota municipalities have
address problems associated with youth historically been the leading funding source
access to alcohol and tobacco. for environmental protection and
improvements. Municipal efforts include
Response: The League of Minnesota environmental protection through
Cities opposes any proposal that could wastewater treatment, wetland restorations,
result in increased risks of youth access to stormwater treatment, public utility emission
alcohol and tobacco products and reductions, brownfield cleanup, safe
expanded off-sale venues for the sale of drinking water programs, as well as others.
such products. The League supports the At some point, however, the diminishing or
sale of alcohol and tobacco products only
in controlled environments. The League nonexistent environmental benefit received
supports statutory changes that assist in from additional efforts is fiscally
reducing youth access to alcohol and irresponsible. The programs are often
tobacco products, including increasing improperly designed to meet their stated
the penalties for youth who use false goals. Additionally, the absence of funding
identification and adults who provide by the state and federal government has
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 34
removed an essential restraining feature in � Third-party environmental advocacy
program design and implementation. groups create significant hardships
Agencies are less accountable to the on cities by threatening litigation
governments that mandate environmental even when hard science may not
programs when they do not have to find the support the groups' positions.
money to implement the programs. g) Cities are often required to pay the
cost of removing problem materials
Specific problems faced by cities include: from the waste stream, rather than
preventing the problem at the
a) New programs or standards are consumer product or manufacturing
continually adopted without regard level.
to the existence, attainability or cost
of existing programs and standards. Response: Alternative wastewater
b) Regulatory bodies fail to consistently treatment and cooperative service systems
use good science and the most should be prohibited from operating in
current and accurate data when areas that can reasonably and effectively
establishing water quality standards. be served by existing municipal systems,
c) Regulatory bodies impose new unless:
permit requirements without going
through rulemaking. Instead, the a) The municipal system is proven to
agencies rely on internal documents, be substantially less cost-effective
program strategies, and "best and substantially less beneficial to
professional judgment of staff' when the environment.
setting permit criteria. b) The operation of these systems will
d) Regulatory bodies approve permits not create a stranded public
and programs that compete with investment in the existing system.
traditional municipal services and
encourage urban sprawL This Sufficient state and federal financial
behavior puts at risk the public assistance should be provided to local
investments and growth management governments when complying with state
efforts cities have made when and federal infrastructure requirements,
planning for future development. particularly with regard to wastewater,
e) Permit fees and other cost-transfer stormwater, and drinking water facilities.
elements of federal and state
programs do not provide an incentive The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
for environmental agency efficiency, (MPCA) should streamline its permitting
policy prioritization or risk and re-issuing processes to allow for
assessment. Additionally, all effluent standards and permit
residents of the state contribute to the requirements to be known earlier,
need for wastewater and stormwater thereby giving communities more time to
treatment and benefit from the defend against contested case hearings.
resulting improved water quality.
These factors make the state general The Legislature should require the
fund an appropriate source for MPCA to make its determination
significant portions of state water regarding permit-required submittals,
program funding. permit modifications, and the reissuance
of a permit within a reasonable set time
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 35
period, and require the MPCA to make continue to invest in wastewater and
its determinations and reissue the permit stormwater management systems and best
within that reasonable set time frame. management practices to protect, preserve,
and restore the quality of Minnesota's
The state should ensure townships are surface waters, the quality of some of
required to meet the same environmental Minnesota's surface waters does not meet
protection and regulatory requirements federal water quality requirements. The
as cities. federal Clean Water Act requires that further
efforts be made by the state to reduce human
Legislation should be passed that requires impacts on surface waters that are
state agencies to establish permit determined to be impaired due to high
requirements only when the criteria they pollutant loads of nutrients, bacteria,
are using is developed through the rule- sediment, mercury, and other contaminants.
making process. Scientific studies of these waters must be
conducted to determine how much pollution
State agencies need to develop science- they can handle (Total Maximum Daily
based standards and quantify new Loads, or TMDLs). The pollutant load
effluent standards, ensuring that they are reduction requirements will affect
scientifically and economically municipal, industrial, and agricultural
practicable. practices and operations along any river,
The state general fund is an appropriate stream or lake determined to be impaired.
source for state water program funding. while the sources of 86 percent of the
Municipal water permit fees should only pollutants affecting Minnesota waters are
be increased if new revenue is needed non-point sources, there will also be new
because of increased costs of processing costs and requirements for point-source
municipal water permits, not as a means dischargers, like municipal wastewater
to generate new revenue to cover other treatment facilities. Municipal stormwater
budget shortfalls. systems will also face increased protective
requirements and regulation as part of the
The Legislature should create effective, state's impaired waters program.
producer-led reduction, reuse, and
recycling programs to deal with a Response: The League of Minnesota
product's lifecycle impacts from design Cities will work actively with the
through end-of-life management and administration, the Legislature, and other
should regulate products and compounds stakeholders in the design and
that damage water quality, sewer implementation of Minnesota's impaired
collection, stormwater or wastewater �'�'aters program to:
treatment systems at the consumer and a) Ensure equitable funding solutions
manufacturing levels, not just at the are found, such as the state general
treatment and infrastructure fund or bonding, that broadly
maintenance level. collect revenue to address this
SD-57. Impaired Waters statewide problem.
b) Support legislative appropriation
Issue: Despite the billions of dollars that of constitutionally dedicated clean
Minnesota municipalities have invested and �'�'ater revenues that will
supplement traditional sources o#'
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 36
funding for these purposes, not be g) Recognize and credit the work
used to cover budget cuts, backfill underway and already completed
past program reductions, or to by local units of government to
otherwise supplant normal state limit point and non-point source
spending on water programs. water pollutant discharges.
c) Direct the majority of funds h) Recognize the diversity of efforts
collected by the state for impaired and needs that exists across the
waters into programs that fund state.
municipal wastewater and i) Ensure the best science available is
stormwater projects, and for state used to accurately determine the
programs needed for municipal sources of pollutant load in order
wastewater and stormwater to maximize positive
permitting and technical support, environmental outcomes and
including the Clean Water minimize unnecessary regulatory
Revolving Loan Fund, Wastewater and financial burdens for cities by
Infrastructure Fund, Phosphorus correctly accounting for and
Reduction Grant Program, TMDL addressing agricultural and other
Grants Program, Small non-point pollutant sources.
Community Wastewater j) Ensure the state requires that the
Treatment Grant and Loan MPCA retain control of the
Program, and other state TMDL development process and
programs that provide financial that all scientific research related
resources for city wastewater to TMDLs is conducted by the
treatment facilities, septic tank MPCA or qualified, objective
replacement, stormwater parties pursuant to state
management projects, and other contracting, procurement, and
city water quality improvement conflict of interest laws.
and protection projects. k) Clarify state water quality
d) More adequately cover the current mandates so cities know
five-year wastewater , specifically what they are required
infrastructure funding need to do and what methods of
projection of more than $1.65 achieving those outcomes are
billion. acceptable to state and federal
e) Recognize and address the regulators.
upcoming costs of stormwater
management infrastructure and SD-58 Phosphorus Reduction
operation on municipalities from
new regulatory mandates and load Issue: In 2002, the Legislature enacted a
reduction requirements. new law to regulate the sale and use of lawn
f� Allow flexibility in achieving fertilizers containing phosphorus in the
pollutant load reductions and metropolitan area. In 2004, the legislation
limitations through offsets or was expanded statewide. In 2007, legislation
trading of pollutant load reduction was passed to reduce the phosphorus content
credits for both point and non- of residential dishwasher detergents. These
point load reduction requirements laws will improve and enhance the quality
within watersheds. of the state's surface waters. In addition, the
new law will reduce the costs to local
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 37
governments of complying with a variety of The costs for control and removal can be
federal and state surface water quality catastrophic and put pressure on city
standards. budgets. The Minnesota Department of
Natural Resources, through its Urban and
Cities are required by several levels of Community Forestry program, and the
government to improve and enhance the Minnesota Department of Agriculture,
quality of surface waters. Additionally, through its Shade Tree and Invasive Species
surface water runs through watersheds that program, currently have regulatory authority
rarely are wholly within a city's boundaries. to direct tree sanitation and control
To be effective, measures for comprehensive programs. Although these programs allow
water quality improvements need to be for addressing some tree disease, pest, and
regional or statewide. other problems, funding levels have been
inadequate to meet the need of cities to build
The 2002, 2004, and 20071aws underscore capacity for urban tree programs and
the most cost-effective way to reduce respond to catastrophic problems. Cities
phosphorus in our lakes, wetlands, and share the goal of the state's Releaf
streams—by preventing it from entering Program promoting and funding the
these systems. The laws, however, address inventory, planning, planting, maintenance,
only two, specific phosphorus inputs to city and improvement of trees in cities
water systems. Many other sources of throughout the state. In addition, economic
phosphorus, such as commercial detergents, gains for stormwater management, tourism,
affect both surface water quality and recreation, and other benefits must be
treatment requirements at municipal protected from tree loss. A lack of timely
wastewater treatment facilities. The state is investment in urban forests costs cities
the appropriate level of government for significantly more in the long run.
effective and economical administration and
enforcement responsibility. Response: The League of Minnesota
Cities supports funding for a state
Response: The League of Minnesota matching grant program to assist cities
Cities opposes any legislation that would With building capacity for urban forest
weaken existing phosphorus fertilizer and management and meeting the costs of
dishwasher detergent regulation, and preparing for, and responding to,
supports removing phosphorus from catastrophic urban forest problems.
products at the manufacturing level Additionally, the League supports
� rather than at the wastewater treatment reinstatement of the Minnesota Releaf
center. The League further supports Program, through the Legislative and
retail display requirements to ensure Citizens' Commission on Minnesota
consumers are able to readily identify the Resources (LCCMR), with an increased
phosphorus content of fertilizer products. appropriation that can better address the
needs of building capacity and managing
SD-59. Urban Forest Management urban forests across the state
Funding
SD-60. Election Issues
Issue: Urban forests are an essential part of
city infrastructure. Dutch elm disease, oak Issue: Cities play an important role in
wilt disease, drought, storms, and emerald administering state and federal election law
ash borer threaten our investment in trees. and conducting voting activities.
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 38
Response: In order to strengthen the role officials are also faced with the additional
and effectiveness of local election task of delivering supplemental roster lists
administration, the Legislature should: of such voters to the polls before the polls
open the next morning. The current
a) Seek the guidance of cities, townships, absentee voting process further requires that
counties, and school districts on any a supplemental list of final absentee voters
and all proposed changes to voter be delivered to the polls after the last mail
registration and election law; delivery on Election Day and often leads to
b) Expedite court action to resolve administrative challenges and increased
candidate eligibility related to potential for errors in the process.
residency in errors and omissions
proceedings; Response: The League of Minnesota
c) Allow absentee ballots to be combined Cities supports:
with their respective Election Day in-
person ballots for the conduct of post- a) Establishing an earlier deadline for
election audit reviews; ending in-person absentee voting
d) Eliminate redundant audio testing of prior to Election Day;
AutoMARK voting equipment by b) Revising absentee ballot regulations to
election judges in precinct polling allow any person over 18 to witness
places on Election Day; the absentee process and sign the
e) Repeal requirements for precinct envelope as a witness; and
election judges to count blank ballots c) Authorizing cities with multiple health
in each shrink-wrapped ballot care facilities to schedule election
package as they are opened in the judges to conduct absentee voting at
polling place; an earlier date in health care facilities.
� Shorten the deadline for major
political parties to provide lists of SD-62 Early Voting
persons interested in serving as
election judges to election officials to Issue: Minnesota allows absentee voting by
within one month (30 days) following mail and in-person for specific reasons set
precinct caucuses; and by statute. Most Minnesotans consider the
g) Support changes to state absentee current absentee voting system as "early"
voting regulations to make it possible voting and use it as a convenience rather
for local election jurisdictions to be than in conformance with statute. Many
consistent with federal MOVE Act states have implemented actual early voting
requirements. procedures for in-person voting and found
them to be a cost effective and efficient
SD-61 Absentee Voting method to serve the voters. An early voting
system eliminates many of the
Issue: Current law allows in-person administrative burdens and costs of the
absentee voting until 5:00 p.m. on the night current absentee ballot procedures. In
before the election. This does not leave addition, unlike the absentee voting process,
adequate time for election officials to early voting allows the in-person voter to
process absentee ballots and mark polling correct errors made marking the ballot and
place rosters prior to the opening of the polls discovered by the ballot tabulator, the same
on Election Day to indicate which voters as a voter on Election Day.
have already cast absentee ballots. Election
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 39
Response: The League of Minnesota Response: The League of Minnesota
Cities supports the adoption of legislation Cities supports legislation to give cities
establishing an early voting process the option to require that write-in
developed in cooperation with local candidates for local elective offices file a
election officials to replace in-person formal request at least seven days before
absentee voting. City election officials the city election if they wish to have their
recommend additional voting hours write-in votes counted.
outside of regular business hours be made
available for `�Early Voting." SD-65. Felon Status for Voter
Eligibility
SD-63. Ranked Choice Voting
Issues Issue: Confusion continues regarding when
felon voting rights are restored, leading to
Issue: There are no state standards for state challenges placed on Election Day rosters
election laws and rules for conducting state for felons who are not eligible to vote. The
or local elections that use ranked choice Governor's Task Force on Election Integrity
voting (RCV) as the method of electing has identified changes to current state and
candidates to office. county criminal justice system record-
keeping and information technology to
Response: The League of Minnesota effectively alleviate these circumstances and
Cities urges the Legislature to adopt supports legislation to effectively address
statewide standards to ensure RCV is the shortcomings of current process to
implemented consistently throughout the provide information to individuals on
state to give voters confidence in the probation regarding their voter eligibility
fairness of the alternative process of status.
casting their ballots and the outcome of
such elections. Response: The League supports the
position of the Governor's Task Force on
SD-64 Write Candidates in City Election Integrity and seeks action by the
Elections 2013 legislature to enact measures that
have been incorporated in legislation that
Issue: Local election officials are currently was introduced during the 2102 legislative
required to take considerable time and spend session to:
additional funds to count frivolous write-in
votes cast in city elections. Cities that a) Require the Department of
conduct local elections using ranked choice Corrections to share data with the
voting (RCV) also encounter diff'iculty when Secretary of State regarding the last
determining the ranking of candidate votes known residential address of
when addressing these circumstances. At individuals serving a felony sentence
present, write-in candidates for federal and on probation or supervised release
state elective offices are required to file a with loss of civil rights;
request with the Secretary of State no later b) Direct that individuals whose
than seven days before Election Day if they eligibility to vote is either rescinded or
wish to have the votes cast for them restored be given written notice by the
counted. county auditor to reaffirm their
eligibility to vote;
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 40
c) Provide that felons on probation be SD-67. Library Funding
notified in writing in their probation
agreement and notice kept on file that Issue: Many community libraries in
they may not register or vote during Minnesota are city-owned. Although located
the period of supervision; in an individual community, city libraries
d) Direct the Secretary of State to serve a much wider area. Local libraries are
provide written notice to such constantly working to address the needs of
individuals on probation for a felony users in order to provide access to both
offense that results in the loss of civil written and electronic media to enhance the
rights that registering to vote or educational capacity of adults and children.
voting while on probation is a felony
and may result in loss of probation The state's library Maintenance of Effort
and that the completion of probation mandate (MOE ) is a minimum level
without a new felony conviction required by the state to receive federal and
restores the individual's right to vote; state aid funds; this is covered under Minn.
and Stat. § 134.34. The money includes funds
e) Reduce criminal penalties for for statewide and regional delivery of
ineligible voter registration applicants interlibrary loans, licensing of electronic
who register but do not cast a ballot to resources, continuing education
a misdemeanor. opportunities, and grants coordinated or
administered by the region. Literacy is a big
SD-66. Charter Authority to issue for many communities and libraries
Establish Commencement and play a key role in addressing the issue.
Expiration of Terms of City Elected while the MOE is seen as a mandate by
OffiCials cities and counties, the MOE also protects
the taxpayer investment in library resources
Issue: Some city home rule charters provide and services by providing a more stable
that the terms of city elected officials source of funding.
continue until successors have been elected The MOE issue for public libraries rose to
and qualified. But the 2010 Legislature the forefront in the 2009 legislative session
enacted provisions that raise concerns about With two local aid unallotments, and the
whether home rule charter authority in this desire to provide some mandate relief to
area has been pre-empted by language that local governments. The 2011 Legislature
provides that terms of city elective offices provided a 10% reduction in the MOE
expire on the first Monday in January. amounts for cities and counties as part of the
Response: The League of Minnesota special session budget deal. Given the
Cities urges the Legislature to clarify complexity on both the service delivery and
authority that home rule charters may the funding sides to this issue, the Office of
provide that terms of office for elected Legislative Auditor (OLA) was tasked with
city officials begin on the first Monday in conducting a study on public libraries that
January and continue until their acknowledged the funding disparities, but
successors are elected and qualified, unfortunately offered no solutions.
unless the charter provides otherwise. Response• The League of Minnesota
Cities supports a state matching grant
program to provide dollars to assist
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 41
communities to work in partnership to Response: The League of Minnesota
build and improve libraries. Additionally, Cities supports increasing the allowable
when reviewing the OLA's report, the annual charter commission egpense limit
Legislature should take into consideration to $5,000 for cities other than cities of the
the current methods of delivering library first class.
services across the state and whether
those are fair and equitable to local
governments and their citizens. When
modifying the library MOE
requirements, the Legislature should
ensure that any relief provided on the
county MOE requirement does not result
in additional funding burdens for cities.
Finally, policymakers should consider
whether establishing library taxing
districts might help with the equity issues
of funding libraries.
SD-68. Park and Library Land Tax
Break
Issue: As the price for land increases, it is
becoming more difficult for cities and other
local units of government to compete with
developers to save and secure land and
easements that are deemed appropriate for
park, library, trail, and green spaces.
Response: The state should amend the tax
laws to provide tax incentives for
property owners who sell land and
easements to local units of government
when the land is to be used for park,
library, trail or green space purposes.
SD-69. Charter Law Expense Limit
Increase
Issue: Under current law (Minn. Stat. §
410.06), charter commission expenses that
are paid by the city are limited to $10,000 in
a first class city and $1,500 in all other
cities. The first class city limit was increased
in 1961 from $1,500 to $10,000 while the
limits for all other charter cities have not
been adjusted since 1947.
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 42
IMPROVING LOCAL ECONOMIES
LE-1 Growth Management and sued for a"taking" as a result of
Annexation executing state land-use policies.
d) Give cities broader authority to
Issue: Unplanned and uncontrolled growth extend their zoning, subdivision, and
has a negative environmental, fiscal, and other land-use controls outside the
governmental impact on cities, counties, and city's boundaries, regardless of the
the state because it increases the cost of existence of county or township
providing government services and results in controls, to ensure conformance with
the loss of natural resource areas and prime city facilities and services.
agricultural land. e) Clearly define and differentiate
between urban and rural development
Response: The League of Minnesota and restrict urban growth without
Cities believes the existing framework for municipal services or annexation
guiding growth and development agreements outside city boundaries.
primarily through local plans and This should contain a requirement
controls adopted by local governments that counties and joint power districts
should form the basis of a statewide that provide sewer, water, and other
planning policy, and that the state should services, which have been traditionally
not adopt a mandatory comprehensive provided by cities, include as a
statewide planning process. Rather, the condition of providing service the
state should: annexation of properties that are the
recipients of such services in cases
a) Provide additional financial and where annexation is requested by a
technical assistance to local city that could feasibly be providing
governments for cooperative planning those services.
and growth management issues, � Facilitate the annexation of urban
particularly where new land to cities by amending state
comprehensive plans have been statutes that regulate annexation to
mandated by the Legislature. make it easier for cities to annex
b) Keep comprehensive planning developed or developing land within
timelines on a ten-year cycle due to unincorporated areas.
the financial and workload impacts g) Oppose legislation that would
these processes place on cities. reinstate the election requirement in
c) Clearly establish the public purposes contested annexations.
served by existing statewide controls, h) Support legislation to prohibit
such as shore land zoning and detachment of parcels from cities
wetlands conservation; clarify, unless approval of the detachment has
simplify, and streamline these been granted by both the affected city
controls; eliminate duplication in their and township and the affected county
administration; and fully defend and has been notified prior to the city and
hold harmless any local government town acting on the request.
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 43
i) Encourage ideas consistent with the wildlife management areas far less desirable
long-term goal of allowing urban due to impacts on future city development.
development only in urban areas.
Density incentives such as sprawl- In rural areas, where this is less of a
reduction aid programs are more concern, counties and towns have the
straightforward methods of rewarding authority to object to the state purchasing
and encouraging compact urban land for the outdoor recreation system for
development than using local these very reasons. Cities do not have that
government aid (LGA) for another statutory right. Dueto recent statutory
new purpose. changes (Minn. Stat. § 97A.137, subd. 4)
j) Establish stricter criteria on the removing city authority to adopt ordinances
amount cities can pay to townships as related to firearm discharge, hunting and
part of an orderly annexation trapping activity in wildlife management
agreement so that payments to areas within their borders, these purchases
townships are limited to should not occur without city consent and
reimbursement for lost property tax input.
base for no more than a fixed number
of years, documented stranded Response: The League of Minnesota
assessments, and other items for Cities opposes the state imposing
which there is a clear nexus. retroactive development restrictions
around egisting wildlife management
LE-2. Wildlife Management Areas areas.
Issue: The Department of Natural Resources when purchasing state wildlife
has been pressing for legislative management areas and other
requirements creating development conservation and outdoor recreation
restrictions on property adjacent to land system land, the state should either
purchased by the state for hunting and other purchase sufficient land to provide an
conservation purposes. This issue has been internal buffer from surrounding
increasingly controversial as urban growth development or purchase development
extends into areas previously considered rights to land adjacent to the property if
rural and residential property owners are such a buffer is deemed essential to
finding themselves adjacent to public preserving the intended uses for the
hunting land. With large amounts of new property. This should be required for new
revenue going into state land purchase for land purchases and done where feasible
game and fish habitat and public access for existing wildlife management areas.
purposes because of the passage of the
constitutional amendment, these problems Furthermore, Minn. Stat. § 84.944 and §
could occur even more frequently. 97A.145 should be amended to include
cities in the local government notification
The solution being proposed will put local and approval process the state must
governments in the position of enforcing follow before purchasing public land.
state land use restrictions and would require
extensive changes to local plans, controls
and ordinances. It would also create large
numbers of nonconformities on properties
within city limits and would make state
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 44
LE-3. Official State Mapping proceedings. Eliminating authority of
Responsibility municipal electric utilities to extend
services, or making extension of municipal
Issue: For many years, the Minnesota electric service to annexed property
Department of Transportation (MnDOT) has unreasonably costly, would interfere with
provided the mapping services to keep community development and make it
survey-level accuracy in place for the state's unfeasible for municipal electric utilities to
official maps and records. That information serve properties located within rural electric
changes when roads are made or improved, cooperative (REC) service territory in
and needs regular adjustment when annexed areas, even if the REC had not
municipal boundary adjustments are made. served them prior to annexation.
The information is then used at all levels of
government to accurately determine Response: The League of Minnesota
property boundaries for transportation aid, Cities opposes any attempt to remove or
utility service boundaries, state and local alter the eminent domain option available
funding formulas, election issues, and a to municipal electric utilities in state law,
number of other uses. or to make it financially unfeasible for
municipal utilities to compensate rural
No state agency, however, has ever been electric cooperatives for serving future
statutorily provided with mapping customers who reside in annexed areas
responsibility and MnDOT is not funded for where the cooperative has not provided
providing that level of detail in its mapping. service.
Because MnDOT, as an agency, requires
less specificity in its maps, a change has LE-5. Statutory Approval
slowly been integrated to mostly restrict Timelines
MnDOT mapping to what changes occur in
road ownership and responsibility, leaving Issue: Cities since 1995 have been required
many mapping needs unmet for other users to act on written requests relating to zoning,
of boundary data. septic systems, the expansion of
Metropolitan Urban Service Areas (MIJSA),
Response: The League of Minnesota and other land-use applications in
Cities supports legislation making a accordance with a statutory time period
named state entity the official provider of generally referred to as the 60-day rule.
survey-level mapping for the state, Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 15.99, state and
including maps for municipal boundary local government agencies must approve or
adjustments. The Legislature must deny a permit within a statutory timeframe.
provide the necessary appropriations to Failure by the agency to issue a specific
the entity for providing that service. denial of the application is deemed an
approval.
LE-4. Electric Service Extension
Minn. Stat. § 15.99 does not directly address
Issue: Minnesota law preserves the right of whether an appeal of a decision triggers an
municipal electric utilities to grow with the extension or is part of an original zoning
cities they serve. Municipal electric utilities request that must be handled within the 60-
may grow either through application to the or 120-day time period. In a 2004 recent
Minnesota Public Utilities Commission court of appeals decision, the court found
(MPUC) or through condemnation that a zoning application is not approved or
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 45
denied for the purposes of Minn. Stat. § b) Clarify that approval does not
15.99 until the city has resolved all appeals abrogate the need for approvals under
challenging the application. See, Moreno v. other applicable federal, state or local
City of Minneapolis, 676 N.W. 2d 1(Minn. requirements.
Ct. App. 2004). According to the court, an c) Provide appeal rights to adjacent
appeal is not a request for a permit, license property owners.
or other governmental approval; therefore, it d) Clarify that, if requests are to be
does not trigger a new 60-day time period. decided by a board, commission or
Under this interpretation, a decision other agent of a governmental agency,
rendered by a zoning board or planning and the decision of the board,
commission is not the final approval or commission or other agent is adopted
denial of an application if the city allows an subject to appeal to the governing
appeal to the city council. body of the agency, then the agency
may extend the 60-day time limit to
This court decision is problematic for a resolve the appeal.
couple of reasons. Forcing cities to further
condense the process for considering LE-6. Public Infrastructure Utilities
planning and zoning applications will make
it more difficult to gather public input and Issue: Successful economic development
leave less time for thoughtful deliberation by efforts and community stability are
zoning boards and planning commissions. It dependent upon a city's ability to make
may also provide an incentive for cities to infrastructure investments. Current
extend the origina160-day period in every infrastructure funding options available to
instance in order to build-in adequate time to cities are inadequate and unsustainable.
consider possible appeals. Funding pressures have been exacerbated by
levy limits, unallotment and reductions in
While the Legislature has clarified some the local government aid and market value
aspects of this law, additional modifications homestead credit programs. The existing
are necessary to assist cities in providing special assessment law, Minn. Stat. ch. 429,
accurate and timely responses to applicants does not meet cities' financing needs
and to allow adequate time for public input. because of the benefit requirement. The law
Furthermore, as city staff and financial requires a minimum of 20 percent of such a
resources are increasingly limited, flexibility project to be specially assessed against
in the length of approval timeline affected properties. In practice, however,
requirements may be needed at the local proof of increased properiy value to this
level. degree of benefit can rarely be proven from
regular repair or replacement of existing
Response: The Legislature should repeal infrastructure such as streets or sidewalks.
or amend Minn. Stat. § 15.99. If repeal is Alternatives to the Minn. Stat. ch. 429
unlikely, amendments should: methods for financing infrastructure
improvements are nearly nonexistent.
a) Increase the initial time limit to 90
days or have the language in Minn. The Legislature has given cities the
Stat. § 15.99 apply as the default authority to operate utilities for waterworks,
requirement only in cases where sanitary sewers, and storm sewers. The
permitting bodies have not established storm sewer authority, established in 1983,
an independent approval timeline. set the precedent for a workable process of
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 46
charging a use fee on a utility bill for a city LE-8. Foreclosure and
service infrastructure that is of value to Neighborhood Recovery
everyone in a city. Similar to the storm
sewer authority, a transportation or sidewalk Issue: Minnesota has experienced
utility would use technical, well-founded significant numbers of mortgage
measurements and would equitably foreclosures. The number of sheriff sales
distribute the costs of local infrastructure rose to a high of 26,000 in 2008. Although
services. the number of those sales has stabilized
somewhat since then, issues surrounding
Response: The Legislature should community recovery are still ongoing.
authorize cities to create, as a local
option, additional utilities such as a The League is encouraged by the
transportation or sidewalk utility. Such commitment in the 2013 Minnesota Housing
authority would acknowledge the effects Strategic Plan, which prioritizes the
of repeated levy limits and the general implementation of ineasures to support
funding shift from the state to local communities as they recover by focusing
governments for building and agency resources to aid cities and support
maintaining necessary infrastructure; the investment in housing to restore quality of
benefits to all taxpayers of a properly life along with stable neighborhoods.
maintained public infrastructure; and,
the limitations of existing special Cities dedicate scarce resources to address
assessment authority. public safety and maintenance challenges
associated with foreclosed and vacant
LE-7. Development Disputes homes. Cities' revenues also continue to
decline due to delinquent utility payments
Issue: State law is clear that fees collected and property tax payments as well as added
under Minn. Stat. ch. 462 are eligible for cost for nuisance abatements.
judicial review in the event of dispute. The
Legislature recently limited the timeframe Foreclosures also result in an unprecedented
during which an aggrieved party may number of vacant and abandoned properties,
challenge planning and zoning fees to 60 making them a top concern. Left
days after approval of an application. unaddressed, these properties destabilize
However, the law is not clear about what neighborhoods, depressing neighborhood
notice requirements to the municipality are property values, and driving up costs of
necessary, relative to the timing for a person municipal services.
aggrieved by an ordinance or decision under
the municipal planning act to seek review. Although cities continue to strive to preserve
the viability and safety of their communities,
Response: The Legislature should amend without additional resources to address the
Minn. Stat. § 462.361 to establish a 60- variety and increasingly costly impacts of
day time limitation in which an aggrieved foreclosures, they cannot maintain or
person may bring an action against the enlarge those activities to meet local needs.
municipality. The federal government has provided funds
for neighborhood stabilization, but such
funds are limited in eligible uses and scope
and are only available to a limited number of
cities. State funding for Minnesota Housing
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 47
programs has not kept pace with the urgency party/mortgage holder for cost of
of addressing community recovery. maintenance.
h) Support coordinated responses to
Response: The Legislature should: prevent foreclosures, activate and
guide private investment and home
a) Support Minnesota Housing in its purchases, and support distressed
efforts to strengthen communities neighborhoods.
where foreclosures and current rates
of delinquencies are still high (as LE-9. New Resources for
much as 5 percent statewide as Affordable Housing
compared with the normal rate of 1-2
percent). Issue: Cities, along with local housing
b) Secure increased state and federal officials, are concerned about the need for
resources and provide financing tools proactive commitment at the state level to
to help cover city costs associated with aid cities to meet demand for affordable
foreclosures and community recovery, housing that is sensitive to local conditions,
including revenue sources for including meeting the needs of an aging
programs that support foreclosure population, particularly when elderly
mitigation and homeownership residents often must leave communities
counseling. where they have owned their own homes for
c) Consider establishing a non- many years. The League of Minnesota
competitive program to provide a Cities also recognizes that federal, state and
match for city-subsidized affordable local governments all have a role to play in
housing projects. meeting affordable housing needs,
d) Allow cities to take actions necessary preventing foreclosure, and foreclosure
to protect foreclosed and abandoned recovery.
homes from damage and to help
preserve property values in Response: The Legislature should:
neighborhoods where concentrations
of such conditions are present, a) Support the strategic priorities that
including an expedited process to Minnesota Housing has adopted,
address nuisance properties. which include making resources and
e) Support local authority for cities to methods available to maintain and
collect all delinquent taxes, utility improve existing affordable homes,
bills, liens, and assessments on especially housing stock that is aging.
foreclosed and tax forfeited b) Re-enact the "This Old House" law or
properties. a similar program to allow owners of
� Improve notification to cities and qualifying homes to defer the increase
consistency in the information in tax capacity from repairs or
available to cities when a property is improvements to their homestead
in the foreclosure process and vacated. property as an incentive for re-
g) Require the foreclosing occupancy and homesteading of
party/mortgage holder to maintain foreclosed and vacant homes.
foreclosed properties. If the c) Provide stable and long term funding
foreclosing party is unwilling to for Minnesota Housing and other
maintain the property, strengthen city affordable housing programs,
authority to charge the foreclosing including a state low-income housing
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 48
tax credit to help rebuild the state's Legislative discussions have suggested that
partnership with local governments in minimum energy efficiency improvements
the development of homeownership, could be added as point of sale requirements
multi-family rental assistance and for this older housing stock, including basic
housing renovation programs, and renovations such as improved attic
allow flexibility for cities to achieve insulation levels, window caulking and
partnerships and leverage resources outlet sealing.
with private and public entities.
d) Substantially increase long-term While the goals of such a program are
funding for the Economic laudable, there are a number of concerns for
Development & Challenge Fund to how this would actually be accomplished in
leverage local private and public individual cities. Most cities do not, for
resources to develop workforce rental example, have point of sale inspections.
and single family homes. There will also be cases where the house
e) Support legislation to provide sales, will be structurally unable to meet high attic
use, and transaction tax exemptions or insulation requirements, such as with
reductions for development and manufactured housing or with older houses
production of affordable housing and with very little attic space. There are also
use state bond proceeds for land concerns that the cost of ineeting these
banking and trusts as well as energy requirements could result in
rehabilitation and construction of homeowners being reluctant to sell their
affordable housing. houses because of the expense of the
fl Provide funding and financing tools to improvements that would be required to
cities to create affordable senior meet new standards.
housing for our aging population.
g) Provide funding and financing tools to what homeowners will need to accomplish
cities to create affordable housing and these energy efficiency improvements is
prevent foreclosure for veterans. increased exposure to educational
information, such as increased access to
LE-10. Energy Efficiency energy audits and more familiarity with and
Improvement Requirements for access to programs that finance home energy
Housing efficiency projects. This program could be
implemented very efficiently and effectively
Issue: Rising energy costs have brought by utility companies instead of cities.
attention to the poor energy efficiency of Electric utilities have a customer
many private residences, especially in older relationship with homeowners, a regulatory
housing stock. The affordability of this requirement to meet energy demand
housing could be severely impacted by reduction goals through conservation
continued increases in home energy costs. spending, and access to technical expertise
Improvements in the energy efficiency of that can take into account variations in
this housing stock would improve the housing age and construction. Cities could,
affordability of local housing options and however, play a strong role in increasing
would help achieve state energy demand and Public exposure to approved educational
greenhouse gas emission reduction goals. materials.
The challenge is how best to achieve that Response: The League of Minnesota
result. Cities agrees that there is a need to
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 49
improve the energy efficiency of older to educate providers of community
housing stock to reduce energy standards and expectations.
consumption and improve the
affordability of housing. The state should Response: Cities should have statutory
focus its efforts on improving educational authority to require agencies as well as
programs and on improving the use of licensed and registered providers that
existing statewide Conservation operate residential care facilities and
Improvement Program (CIP) �nanced post-incarceration living facilities to
programs to provide homeowners with notify the city before properties are
technical and financial support for operated. Cities should be provided with
weatherization and energy efficiency the necessary contact information once
improvements. Cities should use their licensed or registered. Providers applying
communication tools, such as newsletters to operate residential care facilities or
and web sites, to promote these efforts post-incarceration living facilities should
and to help link homeowners to be required to contact the city to be
educational materials and program informed of applicable local regulations.
resources. The Legislature should also require
establishment of non-concentration
LE-11 Residential Care Facilities standards for residential care facilities
and Post Living and post-incarceration living facilities to
Facilities (group homes) prevent clustering. Finally, licensing or
registering authorities must be
Issue: Sufficient funding and oversight is responsible for removing any residents
needed to ensure that residents living in incapable of living in such an
residential care facilities and post- environment, particularly if they become
incarceration living facilities have a danger to themselves or others.
appropriate care and supervision, and that LE-12. InClusiona Housin
neighborhoods are not disproportionately �' g
impacted by high concentrations of these Issue: Provisions in current state statute
types of facilities. Under current law, (Minn. Stat. § 462.358, subd. 11) allowing
operators of certain residential care facilities cities to enter into development agreements
and post-incarceration living facilities are
not required to notify cities when they for the inclusion of a portion of the units in
intend to purchase single family housing for the development to be affordable for low- or
these purposes. And cities do not have moderate-income families have been a
authority to regulate the locations of source of conflict between cities and
residential care facilities and post- housing developers.
incarceration living facilities. Cities have Cities are concerned builders view this
reasonable concerns about the safety of statute as a restriction on local authority to
facility residents and neighborhoods, adopt policies that promote availability of
particularly in case of public safety. Cities housing affordable to those who are unable
also have an interest in preserving a balance to purchase or rent housing at price points
in residential neighborhoods between these that the market alone provides.
types of facilities and other uses. It is in the
best interest of providers to inform and work Response: The Legislature should•
with cities before opening a facility in order �
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 50
a) Strengthen and clarify cities' interest rate write-downs,
authority to carry out policies that predevelopment financing, and financial
offer developers a range of incentives underwriting. The Legislature should also
in return for including a designated support efforts by the Minnesota Land
number of affordable units in their Trust Coalition to develop property tax
projects. valuation to lower property taxes for
b) Identify strategies to ensure long-term sales-price-restricted properties enrolled
affordability of rental and owner- in CLT programs.
occupied housing produced as a result
of such policies and practices. LE-14 State Broadband Policy
c) Focus state housing policy to suPP�� Priorities for Cities
for local assessment of housing needs
and direct additional state resources Issue: Little progress has been made in
and the full exercise of local authority achieving high-speed goals for statewide
to increase development of affordable minimum broadband deployment by 2015,
rental units and access to entry-level, as recommended by the 2009 Minnesota
owner-occupied housing. Ultra High Speed Broadband Task Force. To
d) Support voluntary measures to preserve and attract jobs and improve
encourage cities to adopt and carry Minnesota's competitiveness, policymakers
out land-use plans, activities, and must insist on greater progress toward the
subdivision regulations aimed at target placing Minnesota in the top five
providing for construction and states nationally for broadband speed and
marketing of housing where a portion statewide deployment.
of all new units are affordable to
lower-income households. There is increasing evidence and recognition
at both the state and federal level, including
LE-13 Community Land Trusts numerous projects in Minnesota, that cities
play a vital role in achieving significantly
Issue: The increasing price of land available higher broadband speeds and capacity to
for housing development, particularly for ensuring robust, affordable Internet
retaining affordability of housing for lower- connectivity is widely available. The 2009
income households, is a concern throughout broadband task force report noted that
the state. Creating more permanently achieving these goals requires "a broad and
affordable, owner-occupied housing depends perhaps unique collaboration between many
heavily on maximizing the cost- stakeholders" and that no one size fits
effectiveness of taxpayer investments. The solution fits all communities or regions of
Legislature has previously appropriated the state. "While addressing ubiquitous
funding and granted the Minnesota Housing broadband is a statewide goal, it is an issue
Finance Agency authority to assist cities that ultimately will have to be addressed by
with funding community land trusts (CLTs) each community."
for affordable housing.
Yet efforts begun in other states and
Response: The Legislature should support threatened in Minnesota would effectively
continuation of the land trust capacity- ban or unilaterally restrict municipal
building program and provide capital authority to provide or even partner with
start-up funds so community land trusts private sector companies to provide
can continue to offer gap financing, broadband services to unserved or
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 51
underserved residents or businesses, that, in or regional needs and to collaborate
turn, must globally compete for business and with cities and other public entities to
jobs. Taking such actions is contrary to deploy broadband infrastructure
partnerships which already exist and to capable of delivering sufficient
existing state law on electric utility service, bandwidth and capacity to meet
telephony and economic development, immediate and future local needs.
which recognize local interests. g) Remove barriers and restrict anti-
competitive practices that prevent or
Response: The Legislature, governor's impede cities, municipal utilities,
office, and state agencies must make it a schools, libraries, and other public
priority to respond promptly to develop sector entities from collaborating and
policies and programs aimed at making it deploying broadband infrastructure
possible to achieve substantially increased and services at the local and regional
speed and capacity of broadband services level.
available at the local level. h) Recognize the crucial role of cities and
counties in continuing the work of the
To achieve these goals, the Legislature Governor's broadband task force to
and state agencies should: help achieve significantly higher
broadband speeds and to ensure that
a) Identify and implement actions to robust and affordable Internet
achieve the goal of statewide connectivity is widely available.
deployment of advanced broadband
networks and symmetrical high-speed LE-15 Competitive Cable
capacity.
b) Continuously update and verify Franchising Authority
comprehensive statewide mapping of Issue: State legislation was introduced in
broadband services to identify 2010 that would have replaced local cable
underserved areas and connectivity franchising authority with statewide video
issues. franchises. While more than 20 states have
c) Encourage public/private created statewide franchises, effectively
collaboration to achieve state eliminating the role of cities in determining
broadband goals, including
partnerships and cooperation in the terms of competition, many other states
have rejected such legislation.
providing last-mile connections. Comprehensive studies conducted in 2010
d) Support measures to authorize and by the University of Minnesota and other
encourage cities and other local units organizations found that despite promises by
of government to play a direct role in incumbent cable system operators of
providing broadband services. increased competition and/or improved
e) Remove barriers to the exercise of services, competition actually declined,
local authority to provide such along with damaging decreases in support
services, including repeal of Minn. for local origination programming on local
Stat. § 237.19, that requires a community, school and government access
supermajority voter approval for the (pEG) channels and disruption or
provision of local phone service by a discontinuance of private sector
local unit of government. maintenance of institutional networks (I-
� Offer incentives to private sector Nets).
service providers to respond to local
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 52
Cities continue to maintain that transmission exercise of local franchising authority to
of video signals, regardless of how encourage increased competition between
transported, remains subject to local incumbent cable system operators and
franchising authority. new wireline competitive video service
providers including.
Unlike the exercise of local franchising
authority, statewide video franchising a) Maintaining provisions in 2004 Minn.
models frequently make no provision for Laws ch. 238 that establish and
consumer complaints to be received and uphold local franchising authority;
adjudicated at the local level. Such b) Refraining from adopting any FCC
expedited complaint requirements at the rule changes that would restrict
local level solve such problems earlier, existing local authority to charge for
actually preserving customers for providers and control access to public rights-of-
rather than increasing consumer anger way by all video and cable service
toward the local video service provider. providers;
c) Clarifying local authority to impose
Cities joined legislators during the 2010 fees for provider support and
legislative session in successfully pursuing continued provision of video channels
legislation to encourage competitive entry for public, educational and
while ensuring that community needs and government video programming; and
interests are met. d) Providing for continued local
government access to capacity on
Maintaining local franchising most institutional networks (I-Nets)
effectively creates and preserves agreements provided by local cable system
that guarantee broad access to services operators for public safety
throughout the community, ensuring there is communications, libraries, schools,
no digital divide for access to available and other public institutions to use
additional services such as access to IP state-of-the-art network appiications.
voice and high-speed Internet via
infrastructure that also delivers video LE-16. Right-of-Way Management
programming services.
Issue: The Legislature and the Minnesota
Response: State policy should maintain Public Utilities Commission (MPUC)
local cable franchise authority to ensure recognize that cities have fundamental
franchise agreements reflect new responsibility for managing the safe and
technology and are reasonably tailored to convenient use of public rights-of-way
the technical and operational differences (pROW). Cities hold local rights-of-way in
among providers and communities. trust for the public as an increasingly scarce
Independent studies clearly demonstrate and valuable asset. The 2009 consensus
that statewide franchising does not report of the Ultra High Speed Broadband
substantially increase direct competition Task Force recommended "dig once"
to incumbent cable franchisees. coordination of infrastructure projects and
installation of conduit that could be leased
The Legislature, Federal on a non-discriminatory basis to provide
Communications Commission (FCC), and broadband service. Yet when municipalities
Congress should also continue to attempt to provide or partner on carrier-
recognize, support and maintain flexible neutral rings open to all providers, they are
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 53
accused of unfair competition by private terms and conditions as well as standards
providers. Further, when municipalities for construction, maintenance and
enforce consensus standards negotiated with restoration of public rights-of-way.
industry that are contained in Minn. Stat. ch.
237 for safe maintenance of the public State and federal policymakers and
rights-of-way, they are accused — without regulators must:
verifiable evidence — of unreasonable delays
and barriers to entry for enforcing state a) Uphold existing local authority to
standards. manage and protect public rights-of-
way, including reasonable zoning and
These PROW standards have served the subdivision regulation and the
state well for 15 years. As demand exercise of local police powers.
increases for use of rights-of-way for b) Recognize that cities have a
underground wired and overhead wireless paramount role in developing,
facilities and sites for wireless locating, siting, and enforcing utility
communications towers, cities must construction and safety standards.
continue to have authority to allocate and c) Support local authority to require full
coordinate the use of this resource among recovery of fair and equitable
competing uses and to manage the use of compensation from all
PROWs for delivery of essential municipal telecommunications service providers
utility services. Local management for managing use of public rights-of-
responsibilities vary and are site specific, �'ay
underscoring the necessity for maintaining d) Maintain city authority to franchise
local authority. gas, electric, cable,
telecommunications and broadband
In recent years, private users of the PROW services, open video systems and all
urged the Federal Communications other wireline programming
Commission (FCC) to impose a"shot clock" platforms and services and to collect
on the exercise of local authority to approve franchise fees and alternative revenue
applications to install, repair or replace streams to support maintenance and
private facilities in PROWs. Cities still management of the traveled portion of
retain authority to impose construction the PROW and other public services
standards, requirements for moving such of importance to communities.
facilities, and timelines for the completion e) Recognize that some rights-of-way
and inspection of private projects in the become more crawded, the costs of
PROW. disrupting critical city infrastructure
become evident and the exercise of
Response: Minn. Stat. § 237.162-.163 has local authority to manage competing
worked well for many years. Current demands to use local PROWs has
state rules adopted by the Minnesota become increasingly important.
Public Utilities Commission that regulate � Maintain the courts as the primary
the manner in which cable companies and forum for resolving disputes over the
other right-of-way users install facilities egercise of such authority.
in the PROW. These standards were g) Maintain existing local authority to
promulgated in a lengthy collaborative review and approve or deny plans for
process involving major stakeholders, installation of additional wires or
including cities, in the development of the cables on in-place utility poles. In the
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 54
alternative, cities should have broader safety, and welfare concerns, including
authority to require the underground issues of aesthetic and property value in
placement of new and/or existing responding to siting and related requests
services at the cost of the utility or to site, upgrade or alter such wireless
telecommunications entity. facilities. The Legislature should maintain
laws that recognize and uphold city
LE-17. Wireless Tower and authority to manage the siting of wireless
Antenna Siting facilities through local zoning and
regulation and provider agreements,
Issue: Demand for wireless communication including fair compensation.
service has increased requests by private and
public sector providers to site additional LE-18. Economic Development
towers, antennas, and other facilities in Authorities
cities. Local zoning authority and police
power to manage and coordinate the siting Issue: The 2005 Legislature authorized all
of these facilities continue to be necessary counties outside the metropolitan area to
and appropriate to the exercise of local land establish county economic development
use management and police powers. Local authorities (EDAs). Minn. Stat. § 469.1082
management needs vary and are site provides specificity on certain process and
specific, underscoring the necessity for the limitations issues. County EDA activity in
exercise of such local authority, particularly areas surrounding cities will directly impact
as the Federal Communications Commission the adjacent city in terms of service
reviews the comments and reply comments provision and taxes.
to the 2012 Notice of Inquiry regarding
questions related to the details of how such Under Minn. Stat. § 469.107 and § 469.033,
authority is conducted at the local level. EDA levies for economic development
activities are capped. These limits can
Similarly, the proliferation of wireless hinder the planning of future development.
technology leads to demands to both speed With the conversion of the market value
up and relax standards to site wireless tower homestead credit to the new homestead
and antenna facilities even though failing to market value exclusion, a number of levy
coordinate placement of such equipment can restrictions based on market value related to
interfere with vital public safety specific functions such as economic
communications and local site specific land development authorities (Minn. Stat §
use concerns. 469.107), housing and redevelopment
authorities (Minn. Stat § 469.033) and port
While state law regarding local rights-of- authorities (Minn. Stat § 469.053) may
way management (Minn. Stat. § 237.162- inadvertently experience a reduction in their
.163) does not apply to siting such wireless levy authority. The impacts on these entities
facilities in public rights-of-way, the Federal will vary significantly from jurisdiction to
Telecommunications Act of 1996 preserves jurisdiction based on the number and market
and provides for the exercise of state and value of homesteads within the jurisdiction.
local authority over zoning and land-use These levy limits were converted to a
decisions for wireless service facilities. percentage of market value to avoid having
indirect legislative actions, such as class rate
Response: Cities must continue to egercise changes, from decreasing or increasing levy
full authority to consider public health, authority.
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 55
Given the recent economic downturn, private sector to address workforce
development and redevelopment projects readiness issues.
have slowed dramatically or have been
indefinitely delayed. As a result of these Response: The Legislature should
delays, land that is being held by an EDA continue to fully fund the job skills
for development purposes is now running partnership and other workforce training
into the statutory time limit which eliminates programs administered by the
the tax exempt status for the property after Department of Employment and
nine years, or 15 years for those 5,000 and Economic Development, the Department
under in population that are outside the of Human Services, and the various
metropolitan area. The end of a parcel's tax education agencies. The Legislature
exempt status severely reduces the ability of should provide additional flexible funding
an EDA to undertake development activities. to local workforce councils, including
governments and educational facilities,
Response: The Legislature should require for the purpose of upgrading the skills
city approval for proposed county EDA and productivity of the workforce, and
activities within two miles of a city. The pursue additional creative programming
Legislature should consider increasing and funding to prepare and place
the levying authority for EDA, Housing underemployed and unemployed
and Redevelopment Authority (HRA), Minnesotans, as well as address the issue
and port authority activities in Minn. of those phasing out of the workplace and
Stat. ch. 469. Levy limits based on retiring. The Legislature should continue
market value, including those impacting to support cities that provide workforce
economic development authorities, programs that are coordinated with and
housing and redevelopment authorities complement state and regional efforts by
and port authorities should be computed seeking municipal approval before
on market value of the jurisdiction before making any changes to those service
the homestead market value exclusion. areas.
Finally, the League of Minnesota Cities
supports legislation that would extend the LE-20. Community Reinvestment
time that land can be held by EDAs for Partnerships and Financing
economic development purposes while
being exempt from property taxes. Issue: The 2001 property tax reform
package has had a dramatic impact on how
LE-19. Workforce Readiness the state of Minnesota's community
reinvestment needs is addressed. The
Issue: State and federal welfare reform impacts bring into question the future
efforts have focused on the importance of viability of tax increment financing (TIF) as
the welfare-to-work transition, and have the primary tool to fund community
recognized the challenge of ensuring that reinvestment efforts. Additionally, the
individuals are qualified to work. With the impacts of the 2006 eminent domain reforms
changing economy, and the baby boomer will dramatically limit a city's ability to
generation set to retire soon, cities have an assemble parcels of land needed to facilitate
interest in the availability of qualified economic development and redevelopment
workers as part of their economic projects. Activities cities have historically
development efforts, and can serve as a been able to undertake, but will likely be
catalyst with other public entities and the less able to achieve in the future given the
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 56
likely diminished effectiveness of TIF and Given the big picture view of investing in
limited ability to assemble parcels of land, people, the state should maintain a long-
include long-term tax base stabilization and term vision for a healthy society and
growth, job creation, development of low- renew its commitment to early childhood
to-moderate income and workforce housing, family education and preschool programs
remediation of pollution, elimination of that better equip individuals to contribute
blight, recycling and redevelopment of to the local and state economies and that
infrastructure, and redevelopment of ultimately make for quality communities.
communities. Passage of the 2010 Jobs-
State Stimulus bill and the 2011 one-year LE-21. Tax Increment Financing
extension offered up flexibility in several tax (TIF)
increment and public finance provisions, but
only with a short window for actually using Issue: TIF is the most important tool
the tools. available to fund community development
and redevelopment efforts. In light of the
Research into another strategy of current economic and development
community reinvestment has focused on downturns, cities need greater flexibility to
public and private investments in youth. use TIF for community and economic
This body of work suggests that this form of development that support a city's residents
economic development pays off in areas and businesses. Further restrictions of TIF
such as improved high school graduation would render the tool less effective and will
rates and homeownership rates. Helping almost certainly curtail local efforts to
youth develop the social and emotional support job creation, housing,
skills necessary to be contributing members redevelopment and remediation.
of the state economy meets the state's
interest in building quality communities that The new homestead market value exclusion
sustain into the future. will have a negative impact on certain
housing TIF districts. Minn. Stat. § 469.177
Response: To ensure Minnesota is able to provides for adjustments in a district's
continue to effectively compete with other original net tax capacity to reflect the
states, the Legislature has a responsibility conversion of a taxable property to tax
to partner with cities, state agencies, and exempt status and also provides for
other community reinvestment adjustments to reflect changes in property
organizations to develop a statewide classifications enacted by the Legislature.
community reinvestment strategy, and to However, the TIF statute does not address
identify and implement additional tools to tax base changes as a result of the new
fund community reinvestment efforts. homestead market value exclusion. As a
The state should partner with cities in result, the current value of a district will be
community reinvestment activities. State reduced by the exclusion but the original net
acknowledgment of the need for tax capacity will not be adjusted and as a
community reinvestment and economic result, increment available to the district will
development is essential to the state's decline. In 2012, the Legislature passed two
prosperity, and legislation is needed to tax bills that would have fixed this
generate resources sufficient to address unintended consequence, but both were
these critical needs at the local level. vetoed.
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 57
Response: The Legislature should not reflect the new homestead market
enact future TIF law restrictions, rather value exclusion.
the Legislature should:
LE TIF District Deficits
a) Expand the use of TIF to assist in the
development of technological Issue: Along with the property tax reform of
infrastructure and products, 2001, the Legislature committed state
biotechnology, research, multi-modal resources through the TIF grant program in
transportation and transit-oriented order to address the impacts of property tax
development, restoration of reform on existing TIF districts. This
designated historic structures, non- funding, however, was eliminated in order to
retail commercial projects, and non- help address the state budget deficit. Since
wetland areas where unstable/non- then, the Legislature has authorized
buildable soils exist. municipalities to extend districts provided
b) Increase the ability of TIF to facilitate certain criteria are met. At this time it
redevelopment and housing activities. remains unclear whether this will adequately
c) Allow term extensions for address district shortfalls. With declining
redevelopment districts which are market values for commercial-industrial
taking longer to develop as a result of properties on the horizon, some TIF districts
the current economic crisis. may soon not be meeting their projected,
d) Amend Minn. Stat. § 469.1763, subd. 3 anticipated revenues.
to eliminate the "Five-year Rule" for
districts that are taking longer to Response: Municipalities using the new
develop. authorization for district extensions will
e) Modify the housing district income need to closely monitor the effects to
qualification level requirements to ensure the extension adequately
allow the levels to vary according to addressed the shortfalls. If necessary, the
individual communities. Legislature should consider amendments
� Encourage compact development and to the 2003 authorization for addressing
redevelopment. TIF district deficits. Finally, the
g) Discourage any statutory mechanisms Legislature should consider amendments
that directly or indirectly decrease the to the TIF statutes to address any
impact of city redevelopment and shortfalls related to declining market
economic development projects. values in the current economic crisis.
h) Amend Minn. Stat. § 469.174, subd. 4
to provide time limits on the " deemed LE Transit Improvement Areas
increment" created by land sales,
leases and loans, and allow authorities Issue: In 2008 the Department of
greater flexibility in the use of lease Employment and Economic Development
revenues to fund ongoing operations. (DEED) was authorized to establish Transit
i) Simplify the substandard building test Improvement Areas. Transit Improvement
to resolve ambiguities and reduce the Areas include parcels of land that are
continued threats of litigation. located in part within one-half mile of a
j) Revise Minn. Stat. § 469.177 to transit station. A transit station is defined as
provide for an adjustment to the a physical structure or designated area which
original net tax capacity calculation to supports the interconnection of various
transportation modes, including light rail,
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 58
commuter rail and rapid bus transit, and duplicative of what is required in tax
which promotes and achieves the loading, increment finance reports.
discharging and transporting of people. The
commissioner of DEED may designate a Response: Without thorough study, the
Transit Improvement Area if it will increase Legislature should avoid further
the effectiveness of a mass transit project by substantive changes to the Business
incorporating one or more modes of public Subsidies Act during the next legislative
transportation with commercial and housing session, but should consider additional
development, as well as providing a clean technical changes and updates that would
and pleasant place for pedestrian use. The streamline processes and procedures.
law requires the commissioner to consult
with other affected state or regional LE-25. Business Development
agencies. This language was initiated by Programs
communities concerned about the lack of
tools available to shape development around Issue: While the state created and funded
major transit stations. Although the language the Jobs Opportunity Building Zones
passed and was signed in law by the (JOBZ), designed to lure business
governor (Minn. Stat. § 46935), there was development to greater Minnesota, it has
no funding put into place to implement the provided insufficient bonding appropriations
new program. for other Department of Employment and
Economic Development (DEED) business
Response: The League of Minnesota development programs such as the Greater
Cities supports the implementation of this Minnesota Business Development Public
program and urges the Legislature to Infrastructure Grant Program. Furthermore,
authorize various funding mechanisms other proven statewide business
for Transit Improvement Areas, development programs, such as the
including tax increment financing, tax Minnesota Investment Fund, have been cut
abatement, bonding and general fund substantially and recent funding amounts
appropriations for a revolving loan have not matched the needs statewide. In
program or for a grant program. both the short term to support economic
Additionally, the Legislature should recovery and in the long run to improve the
consider adding park and ride facilities to state's effectiveness in retaining, growing,
the list of qualifying transportation and attracting jobs in the global economy,
modes, as defined in Minn. Stat. § there needs to be economic development
469.351. tools available that facilitate job growth,
without relying exclusively on the growth of
LE-24. Business Subsidies property tax base. Current DEED programs
are not meeting the needs of cities or
Issue: In recent years, the Legislature has businesses, thus failing to meet the state-
clarified and modified sections of the local partnership needs for economic
Business Subsidies Act. In order for development.
development agencies to effectively
implement the amended law, the Legislature Response: The Legislature should
should avoid further substantive changes. continue to fund and keep flexible the
Furthermore, the business subsidy reports Greater Minnesota Business Development
mandated on local governments are often Public Infrastructure Grants, as well as
proven statewide business development
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 59
programs such as the Minnesota c) Minimize the administrative process
Investment Fund and DEED land for designating qualified businesses;
recycling programs. These funds should and
not be raided to balance any state budget d) Allow one lead development authority
shortfall, and priority should be given to to administer the program after
increasing the funding for these proven receiving initial resolutions of support
programs, especially during these by other taxing authorities.
economic times. Furthermore, the state
should keep in mind the needs of the LE-26. Land Recycling Programs
entire state, and look to other states for
successful models and effective tools, Issue: Communities across Minnesota are
when developing new business faced with expensive barriers to re-using
development and retention programming. property. These roadblocks include
deteriorating, obsolete, and vacant
The Legislature should continue to fund structures, and contaminated land. Such
and keep flexible the Job Opportunity barriers pose significant problems for cities
Building Zone (JOBZ) program, at a seeking to re-use existing infrastructure,
minimum for economically-distressed maintain and improve property tax base,
areas, through the existing sunset date of provide jobs and housing opportunities, and
2015. The League supports new JOBZ preserve historic structures. Land recycling
projects receiving the full duration of tax activities are particularly costly because
benefit, rather than the reduced time significant remediation must occur before
frame for new projects coming on line. private-sector interest can be generated.
Exacerbating this situation, the land
The state should also authorize and fund recycling programs administered by the
additional business development and Department of Employment and Economic
retention tools as well as a statewide Development (DEED) and the Metropolitan
economic development program that Council programs continue to be
increase Minnesota's competitiveness by underfunded.
improving access to global markets. The
League supports the concept behind the The 2012 Legislature created a Demolition
PROFIT legislation ("Performance Loan Program administered by DEED to
Rewards On Fast Investment Today") assist communities with redeveloping sites
introduced in 2011, provided that it is containing structures and improvements that
made available statewide. If the must be demolished before redevelopment
Legislature passes PROFIT the League can occur, but the program received no
urges the Legislature to: funding.
a) Adequately fund the program by Response: In recognition of the unique
adding additional state tax rebates or needs of land recycling projects statewide,
incentives in addition to the local the Legislature should increase funding
property tax and sales tax refunds; for the statewide redevelopment account.
b) Establish different job creation and The League of Minnesota Cities supports
investment thresholds for the metro a competitive program through DEED
area and outstate Minnesota; with both bonding and general fund
appropriations that distributes the funds
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 60
equitably between greater Minnesota and authority by converting the limit on
the metro area. abatements from ten percent of the current
t� levy to ten percent of net tax capacity.
The State should recognize that the In order to provide maximum benefits and
rehabilitation of land due to obsolescence recognize local decision-making, tax
or incompatible land uses is a component abatements should have less restrictive
of redevelopment. The Legislature should funding caps, financing terms, and
amend the definition of redevelopment authorized uses. Property tax abatements
district under the TIF Act to include the should not be considered a replacement for
obsolescence and incompatible land uses TIF.
included in a renewal and renovation
district, thereby providing cities with Response: In light of current economic
more flegible tools to address land conditions existing property tax
recycling and redevelopment. The abatement authority should be
Legislature should provide general fund strengthened. The Legislature should:
dollars to the Demolition Loan Program
sufficient to meet demand for the a) Expand the abatement authority to
program. allow abatement revenues to be used
for economic development activities
The Legislature should also revive the such as workforce readiness and
"This Old House" law, and consider assistance programs, and technology
enacting similar authority that would infrastructure improvements;
provide a tax deferral on improvements b) Develop a state fund to facilitate state
to commercial buildings, including those participation in abatement projects;
located in designated rehabilitation or and
historic preservation districts. Finally, the c) Eliminate funding caps and duration
Legislature should continue its support limits.
and increase funding levels for state and
regional programs to assist in LE-28 OSA Response Timelines
contamination cleanup and brown�elds
remediation efforts. Issue: The Office of the State Auditor
(OSA) is responsible for tax increment
LE-27 Property Tax Abatement financing (TIF) oversight. As part of its
Authorlty review of TIF districts, the OSA identifies
alleged violations of the TIF laws and issues
Issue: In an effort to increase the number of noncompliance notices to TIF authorities.
development tools available, the 1997 After responding to these noncompliance
Legislature authorized local units of notices within the required 60-day period,
government to grant property tax authorities often do not receive timely
abatements. Although tax increment responses on the matter from the OSA.
financing (TIF) continues to be the primary Government agencies typically have
financing mechanism for local development response-time deadlines. Additionally, TIF
projects, tax abatements provide cities with authorities are often unclear about the final
an important, additional economic disposition of the matter upon receipt of a
development tool. Recognizing the need for final noncompliance notice.
municipal development tools, the 2008
Legislature expanded the abatement
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 61
Response: In the event that the OSA require the OSA to conduct any audits on
determines to issue a final noncompliance decertified districts within one year of
notice to a TIF authority, the Legislature decertification.
should require the OSA to issue the notice
within 60 days of receiving the authority's LE-30 Adequate Funding for
response. Any final noncompliance notice Transportation
should contain the OSA's final position
on the matter, the date upon which it Issue: A well-coordinated state
forwarded the matter to the county transportation policy utilizing all modes of
attorney, and the next steps that are transportation in moving passengers and
required to be taken according to state freight will enhance the state economic
law. Upon expiration of the 60-day development of new and expanding business
period, the authority should be deemed to as well as foster additional tourism
be in compliance with the TIF laws if no opportunities.
final noncompliance notice is received.
Response: More resources must be
LE-29. OSA Time Limitations dedicated to all components of the state's
transportation system, and local units of
Issue: The Office of the State Auditor government must have access to resources
(OSA) has the authority to issue and funding tools to meet growing needs.
noncompliance notices for every existing tax The League of Minnesota Cities supports:
increment financing (TIF) district in the
state for alleged violations of the TIF laws. a) Development of a comprehensive state
This authority extends retroactively to the transportation policy which provides
inception of the district. Accordingly, TIF an environment where all modes of
authorities can receive noncompliance transportation (motor, rail, air, water
notices for alleged violations that occurred and pipeline) complement each other
20 or more years ago. Often, staff and in moving passengers and freight
record-keeping procedures have changed, within the state.
and TIF authorities find it difficult to b) The Statewide Transportation Plan
reconstruct the past in order to identify and 2009-2028 developed by the Minnesota
remedy these situations. Similarly, the OSA Department of Transportation
claims the authority, based on the state's (MnDOT).
records retention schedule, to audit TIF c) MVST distribution of 60 percent for
districts for up to 10 years after roads and bridges and 40 percent for
decertification, which requires cities to transit.
expend staff resources to maintain files and d) A permanent increase in the gas tax.
a working knowledge of old districts for an e) Indexing of the gas tax, provided there
unreasonable period of time. is a limit on how much the tax can be
increased for inflation in a given
Response: A reasonable timeframe within amount of time.
which alleged violations are identified � Increases in vehicle registration taxes
should be established. The Legislature (tab fees).
should reasonably restrict the OSA's g) Trunk highway bonding provided the
ability to issue noncompliance notices to Legislature implements reasonable
the six-year period prior to the notice's restrictions on the amount of debt
issuance date. The Legislature should also service the state will incur, and
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 62
provided the Legislature appropriates LE-31. Truck Weight Restrictions
funding to assist with local costs on Interstate Highways and
related to projects funded with trunk Freeways
highway bonds.
h) General obligation bonding for local Issue: Many of the industries that contribute
roads and bridges, particularly for to Minnesota's economic vitality rely on
routes of regional significance. having the ability to transport heavy loads.
i) A sales tax increase to fund At the present time, the interstate highway
transportation needs. and freeway system in Minnesota has an
j) Funding to assist cities burdened by g0,000 pound truck weight limit, which is
cost participation responsibilities more restrictive than any surrounding state.
imposed by improvement projects on The 80,000 pound limit assumes all trucks
the state's principal arterial system are equipped with five axles. Current law
and on the county state aid highway provides that vehicles carrying additional
(CSAH) system. weight may only do so with a permit from
k) Funding for transportation the Minnesota Department of Transportation
components of economic development (MnDOT).
and redevelopment projects of
regional significance. Business advocates have suggested that
1) Full funding for all components of Minnesota would have a more attractive
state highway projects, including business climate and would be more
related stormwater management economically competitive with surrounding
systems, through state sources. states if truck weight restrictions were
m) Funding to build roads to standards modified. Specifically, they are
that can accommodate the year-round recommending that Minnesota allow trucks
transport of heavy loads. with six axles to weigh up to 90,000 pounds,
n) A sales tax exemption for materials and trucks with seven axles to weigh up to
purchased for state and local road, 95,000 pounds, to operate on the state's
bridge, sidewalk, trail and transit interstate and freeway systems. More axles
construction projects. mean the weight is distributed over a wider
o) Authority for cities to impose area, thereby offsetting road wear.
development impact fees for Additional axles also improve braking
transportation infrastructure. function.
p) Local funding options that would
allow cities to raise revenues for Response: The League of Minnesota
roads, bridges, sidewalks, trails, and Cities supports efforts to attract and
transit. retain businesses in Minnesota. To that
q) Expanded use of alternative revenue end, the League supports increasing the
sources such as MnPASS for funding allowable weight limit for trucks traveling
of maintenance and construction on the interstate highway and freeway
(where feasibility studies indicate the systems within Minnesota so that trucks
program is appropriate). with six axles may weigh up to 90,000
pounds and trucks with seven axles may
weigh up to 95,000 pounds without a
permit. The League also supports
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 63
allowing MnDOT to designate routes for placement of trash in yards and fence
heavy loads. maintenance.
The League opposes limits on local Minnesota has many miles of highways that
authority to impose and enforce weight run through cities. In recent years, the
restrictions on local roads and bridges. Minnesota Department of Transportation
(MnDOT) has cut a substantial percentage
LE-32. Turnbacks of County and of its rights-of-way management staff. The
State Roads cuts have resulted in reduced maintenance
along some corridors and on parcels
Issue: As road funding becomes acquired by MnDOT for transportation
increasingly inadequate, more roads are purposes. Specifically, MnDOT has reduced
being "turned back" to cities from counties the frequency of mowing, litter collection,
and the state. noxious weed abatement, graffiti abatement
and repair of fences and guard rails. This
Response: Turnbacks should not occur maintenance reduction has created public
without direct funding or transfer of a safety concerns, undermined efforts to keep
funding source. A process of negotiation corridors attractive and presented challenges
and mediation should govern the timing, for communities working to promote
funding, and condition of turned-back economic development.
roads. City taxpayers should receive the
same treatment as township taxpayers. Response: MnDOT must maintain state
The requirement for a public hearing, rights-of-way and parcels acquired by
standards about the conditions of MnDOT for transportation purposes
turnbacks, and temporary maintenance located within city limits in a manner
funding should also apply to county consistent with local ordinances
turnbacks to cities. At a minimum, roads governing the upkeep of private property
that are proposed to be turned back to a when requested by the city. Alternatively,
city government should be brought up to MnDOT should reimburse Minnesota
the standards of the receiving cities for the labor, supplies, and
government, or that city should be equipment necessary to maintain state
compensated with a direct payment. rights-of-way to meet city standards
Direct funding should be provided for and/or minimize public safety hazards.
smaller cities that are not provided with The Legislature must provide MnDOT
turnback financing through the with adequate funds to maintain state
municipal state aid system. rights-of-way.
LE-33. MnDOT Rights-of-Way LE-34. Road and Transit Funding
Maintenance for Cities Under 5,000
Issue: Maintenance of property, including Issue: Cities under 5,000 population do not
government property and facilities, is receive any non-property tax funds for their
important to public safety and to the image collector and arterial streets. Citing this fact,
of Minnesota cities. Cities are acutely aware the 2005 Legislature appropriated $4 million
of the responsibility they have for enforcing in additional local government aid (LGA) to
property maintenance codes pertaining to be distributed to cities under 5,000
grass mowing, noxious weed abatement, the population. However, this increase amounts
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 64
to a fraction of what cities over 5,000 The League opposes state imposed
population receive in municipal state aid unfunded mandates that would increase
(MSA) from the Highway User Tax the costs of building streets in contexts
Distribution Fund (HUTDF). Additionally, where facilities for cyclists and
small cities are underserved by regional pedestrians are unnecessary or
transit services and do not have resources to inappropriate.
create or maintain independent transit
systems. LE-36. Railroads
Response: Cities under 5,000 population Issue: Railroads impose far-reaching and
that are not eligible for MSA should be long-term impacts on communities. While
able to use county municipal accounts railroads often support economic activity
and the 5 percent account of the HUTDF. and can relieve pressure on roadway and
bridge infrastructure, they also bring noise,
Uses of county municipal accounts should environmental impacts and safety
be statutorily modified so counties can challenges. Below are some of the concerns
dedicate these funds for local arterials cities have raised about railroads:
and collector streets within cities under
5,000 population. In addition, the 5 a) The cost-share ratio related to roadway
percent set-aside account in the highway crossing improvements is borne
user distribution fund should be used to disproportionately by the public sector.
meet this funding gap. Some estimates are 80 percent public to
20 percent private funding, regardless of
Finally, state leaders should equitably the public entity's ability to pay or
distribute transit resources so that whether service is provided within the
residents of small cities have adequate community.
access to transit services. b) Legislation brought by the railroad
industry that would exempt railroads
LE-35. Complete Streets from stormwater fees and assessments
and shift the cost of complying with
Issue: There is increasing public support stormwater management to other
for the reform of local street design policies property owners.
to make streets safer for pedestrians, cyclists c) The financial burden is faced by the
and neighborhood residents. public sector to deal with mitigation
Response: The League of Minnesota improvements, a cost that the Surface
Transportation Board (STB) is not
Cities supports reforms in state design requiring the private sector to pay.
guidelines for local streets that would give d) The issues associated with long trains
cities greater flexibility to safely moving through communities.
accommodate all modes of travel, e) Difficulty imposing and enforcing
including walking and biking. The state whistleblowing ordinances.
should also provide incentives such as fj Unabated graffiti on railroad cars and
grants to local units of government structures.
working to advance complete street g) Pre-emption of local and state authority
projects. to regulate railroad activities.
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 65
Response: The League of Minnesota Aviation planning is a multi-layered effort
Cities opposes legislation and policies that with different levels of responsibilities.
disproportionately shift authority, costs Currently, the State Airports System Plan is
and/or liability away from railroad put together by MnDOT with individual
companies and onto other entities. The pieces developed by the Federal Aviation
railroad industry, along with state and Agency (FAA), Metropolitan Council (MC),
federal government, must adequately and Metropolitan Airports Commission
mitigate the negative impacts of railroads (MAC). Aviation planning could be
on communities. Railroads must be improved by a more unified statewide effort
required to pay the full cost of at-grade and coordination of the various aviation
improvements that benefit the rail strategies through creation of an oversight
industry or are required for safe body.
crossings. The public sector should not
incur the costs of improvements. sought by Minn. Stat. § 360.017 establishes the State
the private sector, and cities should not be Airport Fund and authorizes the Minnesota
required to fund most of the cost of Department of Transportation (MnDOT)
crossing repairs or improvements. The Office of Aeronautics to support cities,
federal government must exercise greater counties and townships in the planning,
oversight of the STB to ensure fair and development, maintenance and safe
equitable solutions are reached when operation of public airports. In 2003, in
dealing with cities in Minnesota. Finally, order to help balance the state's budget, the
the Minnesota Department of Legislature transferred $15 million from the
Transportation's (MnDOT's) Office of State Airport Fund to the General Fund.
Freight and Passenger Rail should Plans to repay the State Airport Fund in
advocate on behalf of local communities 2007 were delayed to 2008, then again to
when conflicts between cities and railroad 2009, and stakeholders fear more delays will
entities arise. occur. Efforts to preserve and improve the
quality of airports throughout the state will
LE-37. Airport Planning and be hindered by the unavailability of these
Funding revenues.
Issue: Airports are an essential component Response: The state needs a higher degree
of Minnesota's transportation infrastructure. of integration of agencies (FAA, MnDOT,
The Minneapolis-St. Paul International MC, and MAC) and communities related
Airport (MSP) serves as an important to aviation planning. The League of
gateway to the region, the nation and global Minnesota Cities supports the
markets. It serves as a primary access point development of a statewide airport
to our national airport system. This airport, advisory board, which could provide
even with all the planned improvements, input, review and make recommendations
will eventually reach its capacity. The state to assist in development of a
needs to implement a long term strategy to comprehensive statewide State Airports
make better use of other airport facilities and System Plan.
existing resources, reduce environmental The state needs to make planning and
impacts, and achieve sound and sustainable
economic growth throughout the state. investment decisions thatwill maximize
the potential for airports to become
economic development centers that
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 66
provide access to domestic and global
marketplaces. Investments in airports
allow existing businesses to remain and
grow, help attract new businesses,
increase employment, and lower product
and service costs for the benefit of the
region. Finally, the Legislature must
repay the State Airport Fund so that
airport maintenance and improvements
throughout Minnesota can occur.
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 67
HUMAN RESOURCES & DATA PRACTICES
Human Resources protections and processes for public
employees.
HR-1 Personnel Mandates and d) Eliminate contradictory existing laws
L1mit5 on LoCal COntrol regarding public employment.
e) Eliminate mandates for local
Issue: Many state laws increase the cost of government employers that are not
providing city services to residents by imposed upon the state as an
requiring city governments to provide employer.
certain levels of compensation or benefits to � Use the collective bargaining process
public employees, by specifying certain established by state law, rather than
working conditions, or by limiting city legal mandates, to determine benefits
governments' ability to effectively manage for employees covered by collective
their personnel resources. For instance, bargaining agreements.
existing state laws limit governments'
ability to effectively address incompetence HR Firefighter and Ambulance
or misconduct of city employees by Payroll
specifying certain procedures or standards of
conduct that cities must follow. Several laws Issue: Traditionally, many volunteer and
are potentially contradictory and force local paid on-call fire departments have issued
governments to choose which one to follow. paychecks only once or twice per year.
Payroll checks in these types of departments
Response: Any new legislation and would be quite small if issued biweekly or
changes to existing legislation should meet even monthly so employees prefer to receive
the following goals: larger checks once or twice per year. Issuing
checks less often saves time and money for
a) Recognize the need for local decision- administrative staff who prepare the
making authority by local elected payrolls. However, Minn. Stat. § 181.101
officials with regard to the terms and specifies that wages must be paid at least
conditions of employment for local once every 31 days, regardless of whether
government employees (e.g., allow the employee requests to be paid at longer
local elected officials to determine intervals.
employee compensation, employee
recognition, and to make employee Response: Minn. Stat. § 181.101 should
benefit decisions about domestic be amended to exempt volunteers and
partner benefits and coverage of paid on-call employees of fire and
extended family by sick leave policies). ambulance services from the requirement
b) Provide funding that pays the full to be paid every 31 days.
costs of any mandated employment-
related expenditures.
c) Avoid and eliminate expensive and
time-consuming duplicative legal
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 68
HR-3. Pay Equity Compliance are necessary to assist public employers in
implementing this law. For example, current
Issue: State law requires all public definitions of "public employee" are
jurisdictions, such as cities, counties, and confusing and difficult to manage. In
school districts, to eliminate any gender- addition, the arbitration process has
based wage inequities in compensation. produced decisions that are contrary to the
These entities are required to file reports interests of the public, and the legal standard
with the state's Pay Equity Compliance for overturning arbitration decisions is very
Coordinator to ensure compliance with the difficult to meet. Also, recent
law. The 2003 Legislature adopted a two- interpretations of Section 179A.25
year reporting moratorium and extended the (independent review of non-union employee
pay equity reporting cycle from three to five grievances) has created uncertainty and
years beginning in 2005 in order to provide confusion in the longstanding judicial
some relief from this reporting mandate. process used by courts to review city council
However, the Legislature enacted a new law administrative decisions, particularly
in 2005 that reverts to the previous three- employment termination decisions of non-
year pay equity reporting cycle. union employees. Additionally, changes to
the Uniform Arbitration Act which became
Response: The League of Minnesota effective in 2011, are likely to increase
Cities supports the purpose behind the arbitration costs for cities and to require
Local Government Pay Equity Act but changes in the arbitration process that are
has concerns about the administrative not needed in a labor arbitration context.
burdens associated with the existing
statute. The League supports minimizing Response: Minn. Stat. ch. 179A should be
the unfunded state reporting modified to:
requirements associated with this law,
modifying the definition of "public a) Change the definition of "public
employee" to fit with the way that cities employee" under PELRA by
utilize seasonal and temporary workers, removing the existing 14-hour/67-day
extending the reporting cycle, improving requirement and replace it with a
the electronic reporting process, definition in which employees must
reviewing the methodology for analyzing work more than an annual average of
pay equity data, and continuing 20 hours per week.
improvements to the process by which b) Exclude temporary or seasonal
cities receive notification of reporting employees from the PELRA definition
requirements and compliance issues. of public employee in Minn. Stat.
ch. 179A.
HR-4. Public Employment Labor c) Provide different options for accessing
Relations Act (PELRA) arbitrators and utilizing the
arbitration process in order to
Issue: The League of Minnesota Cities "address inequities" between union
supports the purpose of the Public and management representatives.
Employment Labor Relations Act (PELRA) d) Allow public employers to bypass
to balance the rights and interests of public mandatory arbitration required under
employees, public employers, and the PELRA and directly access the
general public. However, certain changes district court system in situations
where an employee is being
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 69
terminated for gross misconduct Specifically, the League opposes any
(sexual harassment, sexual abuse, legislation that proposes payment of
theft or a felony conviction) that is grievance arbitration fees when a
related to the employee's position with settlement is offered and declined.
the public employer.
e) Repeal Minn. Stat. § 179A.25 or, in HR Essential Employees
lieu of repeal, exclude employment
terminations from Minn. Stat. Issue: Cities must balance the health,
§ 179A.25; require a 60-day welfare, and safety of the public with the
timeframe for filing a petition for costs to taxpayers. Essential employee status
review of a grievance under Minn. removes the right to strike, but gives the
Stat. § 179A.25, and clarify that right to mandatory binding arbitration. This
decisions of Bureau of Mediation status can result in arbitration awards that
Services (BMS) under this section are exceed the city's budget or conflict with the
non-binding and merely advisory. city's compensation policy. In recent years,
� Exempt labor arbitrations from a number of employee groups have sought
certain provisions of the Uniform and often received essential status.
Arbitration Act (Minn. Stat. §
572B.01-.31). Response: The Legislature should
carefully examine requests from interest
HR-5 Payment of Arbitration Fees groups seeking essential employee status
under Minn. Stat. 179A (PELRA). The
Issue: Like other employers, cities must League of Minnesota Cities opposes
sometimes make difficult employment legislation that mandates arbitration that
decisions and uphold certain principles in increases costs and removes local
order to best serve the public. In a union decision-making authority.
environment, grievance arbitration is
generally used as a"last-resort" remedy The League supports a mandate for Final
when a difficult employment decision must Offer/Total Package arbitration for all
be made or to uphold an important principle. essential groups on a trial basis. The
Union officials have introduced legislation League also supports a change in the
for the past several years that would require PELRA law that would strengthen
a city or the union to pay arbitration fees if a existing language (Minn. Stat. § 179A.16,
reasonable settlement is offered and refused subd. 7) requiring arbitrators to consider
in a grievance situation, and the arbitrator a public employer's obligation to
ultimately decides on a less favorable efficiently manage their operations.
remedy. The legislation proposed by the Specifically, the statute should be
unions could have the impact of amended to require arbitrators to take
discouraging cities from using the grievance into consideration any wage adjusfinents
arbitration process in a manner that best already given to or negotiated with other
serves the public good. groups — both union and non-union for
the same employer in the same contract
Response: The League of Minnesota year.
Cities opposes legislation that would
undermine the grievance arbitration
process and discourage cities from using
the process in the manner intended.
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 70
HR -7. Re- employment Benefits weigh-in on these decisions through city
council approval.
Issue: Cities employ many workers in
seasonal and temporary positions such as Response: The League of Minnesota
parks and recreation-related positions. In the Cities opposes special legislation for
past, such workers generally have not filed individual employee pension benefit
for unemployment benefits because there increases unless the legislation addresses
has not been an expectation of continued a clerical or administrative error or is
employment. In recent years, cities have initiated and approved by the city council
experienced an increase in the number of of the impacted city.
such workers applying for unemployment
benefits. This increases costs to cities and HR-9. Public Employees
taxpayers in a way that may not have been Retirement Association (PERA)
originally intended.
Issue: In 2010, the Legislature and governor
In the 2012 legislative session, a new law enacted pension stabilization legislation that
was passed which prohibits employers from will begin to address the funding deficiency
entering into agreements with employees not in the PERA General Plan and the PERA
to contest/appeal payment of unemployment Police and Fire Plan. The League of
benefits as part of a settlement agreement at Minnesota Cities supported the
termination of employment. Because most modifications to the PERA plans, which
cities are "reimbursement employers," the included an increase in employer
benefits paid to the employee are at the contributions by $16 million per year,
direct expense of the city. because the overall package of changes,
including a reduction in the annual retiree
Response: Public sector temporary or adjustment, an increase in vesting to five
seasonal employees should not be eligible years, and a reduction in interest rates on
for re-employment bene�ts. In addition, refunds will reduce the unfunded liability in
cities (as reimbursement employers) the plans by nearly $300 million per year.
should be allowed to enter into
agreements with employees not to In 2012 the Legislature, concerned with
contest/appeal payment of unemployment reduced investment returns during the
benefits as part of a settlement economic slowdown, lowered the
agreement. investment return assumption from 8.5% to
8% for five years, to determine what the
HR-8. Pension Benefits long-term rate should be. Lowering the rate
will decrease the funded ratio of all PERA
Issue: Pension benefit plans have years of plans and increase plan liabilities.
service requirements and limitations and
exclusions that act to ensure that the fund's Cities continue to streamline services and
administrators have the ability to predict, cut budgets in response to the economic
contain, and control costs. This protects the downturn, and pension obligations put an
fund's ability to pay future benefits to its increasing strain on city budgets. While the
participants. Legislative exceptions to these base contribution rate for employees and
exclusions and limitations can undermine employers in the PERA General Plan is
this ability. Cities should have the ability to equal, currently, employers contribute
7.25% of salary while employees only
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 71
contribute 6.25%. This is because Minn. responsibility to bring the pension
Stat. § 353.27, subd. 3a requires that plans to full funding;
employers make an additional 1% b) Until the employee contribution
contribution until the actuarial value of the equals the employer contribution, the
plan assets equal or exceed the liabilities. removal of the cap on PERA Pension
Employees do not have a similar obligation Aid payments so the state equalizes
to help the General Plan reach full funding. the contributions of employees and
In 1998 the state began making PERA aid employers;
payments to municipalities to offset the cost c) For PERA Police and Fire, an initial
of increased employer contributions. While increase in the employee contribution
the PERA aid payment rate is frozen at 1999 of at least 1.0% of salary with
levels, the additional employer contribution subsequent increases split evenly
has increased from .43% to 1.0%. In 1999, between employee and employer so
PERA aid completely offset the increased that the contribution ratio moves
employer contribution, making the net toward a more equitable split between
employer contribution equal to that of employees and employers; and
employees. In 2011, however, employers d) The establishment of a hybrid pension
paid more than 111% of the employee plan requiring a Defined Contribution
contribution; over $37.5 million more than component to the public employee
employees. retirement plans.
For PERA Police and Fire, employers pay The League is open to exploring the
14.4% of salary, while employees pay 9.6%, establishment of a completely new
reflecting the historical ratio of 40% pension system for new hires in PERA
employee contribution to 60% employer. General and PERA Police and Fire that is
Despite recent increases in contribution rates more cost effective for public employers
PERA Police and Fire has not received the and retlective of demographic realities.
actuarially required contribution since 2002, Closingan existing defined bene�t plan
resulting in an uncompounded and replacing it with either a hybrid or
underpayment of over $360 million. defined contribution pension plan can
increase short term costs and decrease
Response: The League opposes any revenues for the closed plan. If an
benefit improvements for active alternative plan is implemented, the
employees or retirees until the financial Legislature must ensure that the closed
health of the General Plan and Police and public pension plan remains financially
Fire Plan is restored. viable.
Increases in employer contributions Under current law, when levy limits are
should only be considered by the in place, cities and counties are able to
Legislature after other measures have increase their property tax levy to cover
been considered, including: the increased costs associated with PERA
contribution increases. This authority
a) For PERA General Plan, a 1.0% of does not exist for school districts.
salary increase in employee Because nearly half of active PERA
contributions so that employees and members are school district employees,
employers truly bear the same the League supports providing school
districts with additional levy authority to
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 72
cover the cost of additional contribution c) The League opposes the expansion of
increases. the PERA corrections plan to include
dispatchers due to the substantial
The League also supports the following differences between the dispatchers
plan modifications that will help align and the other positions covered by this
PERA contributions and costs, and plan.
reduce the need for additional d) The League supports the transfer of
contribution increases: all school district employees out of the
PERA General Plan and into another
a) The League believes the legislative fund that is more appropriate for
intent of "in-line of duty" disability school district employees.
retirement benefits for police officers e) Cities should be allowed to continue to
and firefghters was to provide special effectively use retirees in
protection for police officers and reemployment situations. The League
firefighters when they are performing supports policy changes which would
the type of duties that are uniquely include an increase in the earnings
required for their jobs. The League threshold for such retirees. The
supports the statutory changes made League supports keeping the required
to Minn. Stat. § 353.01 in 2007 that break in service at 30 days and
separate injuries resulting from opposes suspending payments to
"hazardous duties" from injuries retirees.
resulting from "non-hazardous
duties" for purposes of police and fire HR-10 Volunteer Firefighter
disability retirement bene�ts. The pension Benefits
League will monitor the effects of the
2007 changes as they are Issue: Cities throughout the state have
implemented. established individual pension plans with
b) The PERA eligibility guidelines must different levels of pension benefits for their
be modified to take into account volunteer firefighter relief association
temporary, seasonal, unique part- members. The efficiency of this system has
time, and student employment been questioned by various members of the
situations in cities—particularly in Legislature and by state agencies from time
recreational operations. The plan to time. Further, in recent years, many local
should be modi�ed to use pro-rated plans have sustained investment losses.
service credit, which would make These losses are required to be amortized
PERA consistent with the other major over a ten-year period. This 10-year
Minnesota pension plans. The League amortization period presents fiscal
supports a comprehensive review of challenges to cities that are already facing
exclusions with an eye toward budget cuts.
simplifying current eligibility
guidelines. Such a review should also The 2009 Legislature created a voluntary
include a possible revision of current statewide volunteer firefighter retirement
penalties for employers that fail to plan to provide an alternative fire relief
report covered employees to ensure retirement option to local units of
that these penalties are not overly government, and in 2010, the Legislature
harsh and punitive. modified the plan to provide additional
benefit levels.
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 73
-
._
Response: The League of Minnesota program (if actuarially neutral for PERA
Cities supports the statewide volunteer pension plans) that would allow:
firefighter pension plan provided:
a) A broadening of the criteria for
a) Participation in the plan remains participation to allow employees to
voluntary, not mandatory; and participate at a younger age, such as
b) The plan takes into account and Rule of 90 employees, if such a change
accommodates the different financial can be made without damaging the
capacities and needs of a wide variety tag-favored status of the plan.
of cities. b) Removing the sunset provision to
allow the plan to continue past 2014.
The League also supports extending the
statutory amortization period to a HR-12. Part-Time Peace Officer
maximum of twenty years. Licenses
HR-11. Retirement Work Issue: Part-time licensed peace officers
Incentives provide critical services to communities.
However, Minn. Stat. § 626.8468 restricts
Issue: Demographic experts warn that as the the number of part-time licensed peace
baby boomers retire, employers will begin to officers that a law enforcement agency may
experience a significant labor shortage and employ. The statute caps the allowable
lose the substantial expertise and knowledge number at the level the agency employed
of a fully-trained workforce. In addition, during the years 1996 through 1998. For
retirees are living longer, are healthier, and many cities, this cap is zera
able to work longer. Therefore, one solution
to the coming labor shortage is to provide Some stakeholders believe part-time officer
some incentives for retirees to continue positions compromise professional standards
working after retirement or to postpone full within the law enforcement community and
retirement with a"phased-in" approach that increase potential liability for the cities that
would allow "knowledge transfer" to take use them. This belief has resulted in efforts
place between the retiree and less- to preserve the cap on part-time licenses or
experienced replacement staff. eliminate part-time licensure entirely.
In the 2009 legislative session, a Phased Cities are anticipating major challenges as
Retirement Option (PRO) program was the workforce ages. In addition, many
created for PERA Coordinated Plan greater Minnesota cities are experiencing
participants. The PRO program meets many population decreases. These factors have
of the goals of workforce planning. made it difficult for some cities to recruit
However, cities would benefit from and retain peace officers. Hiring part-time
broadening the criteria for participation; officers is one strategy that cities can use to
currently, only employees age 62 or older help meet the staffing needs required to
can participate. In addition, the program is provide high quality public safety services.
scheduled to sunset in 2014.
Response: The League of Minnesota
Response: The League of Minnesota Cities believes individual cities are in the
Cities supports changes to the PRO best position to make public safety
staffing decisions for communities and
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 74
opposes efforts to eliminate part-time and creating a stakeholder panel to
officer licenses. However, the League is determine eligibility for benefits under
also sensitive to concerns about liability Minn. Stat. § 299A.465. However, the
issues and maintaining high standards for Legislature preserved the language that
police of�cer licensure. The League reimburses employers on a pro rata basis,
supports a study of the issue of part-time and the law continued to exist without the
licenses with the aim of maintaining the definitions necessary to narrow eligibility
viability of a quality police force for all for the benefit and meet the intent of the
Minnesota cities. law. The panel, which expired on July 1,
2008, did not succeed in narrowing
HR-13. State Paid Police and Fire eligibility for the continued health insurance
Medical Insurance benefit, in part because the few claims
denied by the panel were overturned by the
Issue: Minn. Stat. § 299A.465 requires courts.
public employers to continue health
insurance benefits for firefighters and peace In 2007, the Legislature attempted to limit
officers injured in the line of duty. The law eligibility for PERA police and fire line-of-
originally contained a provision requiring duty disability benefits by defining "duty
the Department of Public Safety (DPS) to disability" as an injury sustained while
reimburse employers for the full amount of performing activities that present "inherent
administering this benefit. dangers specific to these professions." This
means public safety employees injured
Before 2008, many of the claims approved while performing duties that do not present
under Minn. Stat. § 299A.465 were for inherent dangers would be ineligible for
injuries sustained while engaging in non- line-of-duty disability benefits. Due to the
hazardous, on-the job activities such as correlation that has been established
fitness training or office duties. The number between the PERA police and fire line-of-
of eligible claimants combined with rising duty disability benefits and the continued
health insurance costs began to strain the health insurance benefit under Minn. Stat.
fund. By 2002, the fund created to provide § 299A.465, early indications are that this
this benefit became deficient. change is resulting in a decline in eligibility
for continued health insurance.
Instead of increasing the fund, the 2003
Legislature amended the law to pro-rate Response: The League of Minnesota
reimbursements to cities based on the Cities supports the following legislative
amount available and the number of eligible actions to address the funding deficiency
applicants. The 2003 law change triggered a in this program:
significant and unanticipated cost to cities.
Even if the health insurance benefit was a) The state must fully fund programs
discontinued entirely, the costs for existing that pay for health insurance for
recipients will substantially increase well police and fire employees injured or
into the future due to the growing cost of killed in the line of duty as originaliy
health insurance. required under Minn. Stat.
§ 299A.465.
The 2005 Legislature attempted to mitigate b) Cumulative injuries that occur over
the impact of this law on employers by time in the job should not qualify a
providing additional reimbursement funds police officer or firefighter for bene�ts
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 75
under Minn. Stat. § 299A.465 since requirement to bargain over changes in the
these types of cumulative injuries are "aggregate value" of benefits, even when the
not unique to the dangers of police city's contribution has not changed.
officer and firefighter duties.
c) The Legislature must clarify that the Response: The League of Minnesota
amount of an employer's contribution Cities supports legislative efforts to
under Minn. Stat. § 299A.465 is no control health insurance costs while
greater than that given to active maintaining quality health care services.
employees in the same job class. However, cities have differing local needs
d) The Legislature must establish the and circumstances and must retain the
minimum criteria used to determine flexibility to provide unique and creative
ability to work, and set a percentage solutions to the rising costs of health care
threshold of disability for eligibility insurance for their employees. The
into this program. At a minimum, the League:
Legislature must identify that a
workers' compensation determination a) Opposes legislative action that
as to whether the injury is work- undermines local flexibility to manage
related is necessary in order to receive rising health care costs.
the benefts under Minn. Stat. b) Encourages the Legislature to
§ 299A.465. carefully examine any new, mandated
e) Employees who receive a police and insurance-related benefit before
fre disability retirement benefit and imposing it upon city employers to
accept another job that offers them make sure it does not contribute to the
group health benefits should be rising cost of providing health
required to pay for their group health insurance or create conflicts with
benefits with the city should they federal mandates.
decide to continue them. The c) Supports changes to Minn. Stat.
Legislature must amend Minn. Stat. § 471.6161, subd. 5, that would clarify
§ 299A.465 to reflect that employees the intent of the subdivision is to
are required to inform the city when address changes in cost vs. changes in
they become eligible for coverage value. For example: (1) a change in
under another group plan and that provider networks does not constitute
failure to do so is grounds for a change in the "aggregate value of
termination from the bene�ts granted benefits;" (2) a change in benefit levels
under Minn. Stat. § 299A.465. required by an incumbent insurance
carrier does not constitute a change in
HR Health Care Insurance "aggregate value In addition, the
Program5 League supports changes to Minn.
Stat. § 471.6161 that would clarify
Issue: Cities, like other employers in the that an exclusive representative of a
state, are struggling with the rising costs of local government bargaining unit may
health care insurance for their employees. In not use the provisions of Minn. Stat. §
addition, cities must cope with unfunded 471.6161 to block a local government s
mandates imposed on them by the compliance with state and federal
Legislature such as the requirement to pool laws, such as the provisions of state
early retirees with active employees and the health care reform.
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 76
d) Supports changes to Minn. Stat. over half of all loss costs within the
§ 471.61 that would allow cities to pool workers' compensation system. Medical
all retirees (those under or over age costs will be a major driver of future
65) separately from active employees workers' compensation premium increases.
to help cities avoid the liabilities In addition, virtually every year legislators
associated with the new Government introduce proposals to expand the heart,
Accounting Standards Board (GASB) lung and infectious disease presumptions for
requirements on "implicit subsidy." public safety workers, or to make the
e) Supports a clarification to Minn. Stat presumptions more conclusive and difficult
§ 471.61 and to Minn. Stat. § 471.617 to rebut. These types of benefit expansions
to explicitly alleviate a city's further increase municipal workers'
responsibility to comply with group compensation costs.
health benefits mandated by state law
when the city's employees are covered In the last several years, the Workers'
under a union plan authorized by Compensation Advisory Council (WCAC),
federal statutes. a joint labor-management committee whose
� Supports statutory authorization for purpose is to review proposals for benefit
cities to collect up to a two percent changes or other amendments to the
administrative fee from retirees workers' compensation system, has been
receiving post-retirement health discussing ideas to address escalating
insurance benefits. medical costs. While the WCAC system has
g) Opposes a centralized, statewide worked well for many years to help stabilize
health insurance option for active or and de-politicize workers' compensation
retired employees unless• a) issues, more recently this group has had
participation in the plan is offered on difficulty reaching agreement on more
a voluntary, not mandatory, basis; controversial issues. However, in 2007 the
and b) the plan takes into account and WCAC recommended legislation that would
accommodates the different financial have helped contain medical costs in the
capacities and needs of a wide variety workers' compensation system by adjusting
of cities. some payments to hospitals to offset greater
h) Supports changes to the definition of benefits for workers.
dependent under Minn. Stat. § 471.61
to conform to the federal definition of The Workers' Compensation Reinsurance
dependent for employee benefit Association (WCRA) is a nonprofit
purposes. This change would organization that reinsures all workers'
eliminate any question as to whether compensation insurers and self-insured
public employers have authority to employers in Minnesota. The WCRA
extend coverage to dependents beyond assures financial security for Minnesota's
what is currently defined under Minn. employers and their most seriously injured
State § 471.61 (under age 25 actually workers by providing cost-effective
dependent on the employee). reinsurance coverage. There may be
legislative attempts to allow insurers or
HR-15. Workers' Compensation employers to opt out of the WCRA which
could have a negative impact on the viability
Issue: Rising medical costs are an of the WCRA due to adverse selection
increasingly serious problem for all problems.
employers and insurers, and now represent
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 77
During the 2012 legislative session, bills Workers Compensation benefits instead
were introduced to "stack" PERA benefits of using the industry standard of "offsets"
on top of Workers' Compensation benefits due to the extraordinary expense of such
for public safety employees, resulting in an a measure which would ultimately be
employee being able to receive up to 126% passed on to cities and eventually
of his/her pre-injury salary. The cost of this taxpayers.
expansion would likely average between
$500,000 to $1,000,000 per person. The HR Breathalyzers
League is concerned that this measure would
have a similar outcome to that of the public Issue: Currently, breathalyzer use is
safety health insurance bill (Minn. Stat. § permitted for alcohol testing under federal
299A.465) which incentivized public safety commercial drivers' laws. Minnesota law
employees to seek disability pensions and does not clearly allow for the use of
resulted in an extremely expansive and breathalyzers in testing.
costly program which took many years to
rectify. Response: Minn. Stat. § 181.950-.957
should be amended to permit the use of
Response: Legislative action is necessary breathalyzers as an acceptable technology
to address increasing workers' for determining alcohol use.
compensation costs, particularly rising
medical costs The League of Minnesota HR Veterans Preference
Cities supports use of the WCAC system
to consider proposals for changes to the Issue: The League of Minnesota Cities
workers' compensation law, and urges the recognizes the important contributions
WCAC and the Legislature to approve veterans have made and agrees with the
medical cost containment reforms. intent of legislation that gives veterans
certain preferences in employment.
The League opposes expansion of However, since the veterans preference law
workers' compensation and related health was initially passed, the number of
insurance benefits because of the employment protections has greatly
potential for dramatically increasing costs increased. This includes a federal law that
to cities. Speci�cally, the League opposes specifically protects veterans from
expansion of the heart, lung and employment discrimination.
infectious disease presumptions as well as
any expansion of the law that would Changes were made in the 20091egislative
require payment of health insurance session which gave State of Minnesota
premiums or that would include mental veteran employees the same appeal rights as
injuries that have no physical cause or local government veteran employees have
manifestation. had for many years. As part of these
changes, the law limits the right of appeal
The League also supports continuing the for veterans employed by the State of
WCRA as the mandatory workers' Minnesota who are subject to a probationary
compensation reinsurer for insurers and period until after the probationary period has
self-insurers in Minnesota. passed.
Finally, the League opposes legislation In 2011, a Minnesota Supreme Court
that would "stack" PERA benefits and decision held that the process and 15-day
League of MinnesoYa Cities
2013 City Policies Page 78
deadline for appealing from the decision of a Response: The League of Minnesota
veterans preference board or commission Cities supports a legislative change to
applies only to veterans and that an clarify that the state law on drug and
employer must find its right and process for alcohol rehabilitation and treatment does
appealing these decisions somewhere else in not apply to probationary employees.
statute. See, City of St. Paul v. Eldredge,
800 N.W. 2d 643 (Minn. 2011). This HR-19. Background Checks
holding conflicts with employers'
longstanding practice of using the appeal Issue: Many Minnesota cities operate under
process of the Veterans Preference Act. The a longstanding practice of performing
decision also held that first-class cities with criminal history background checks for
a civil service commission or board that employment purposes by accessing the
serves as its veterans preference board have computerized criminal justice database
up to 60 days to appeal under Minn. Stat. § system maintained by the Bureau of
484A1, subd. 2 and that non-flrst-class cities Criminal Apprehension (BCA) through the
that have adopted a merit system have up to city's local police department. The BCA's
10 days to appeal under Minn. Stat. § 44.09, position, in the past, has been that such
subd. 1. The decision did not address what access was appropriate if the city adopted an
statute supplies an appeal process for non- ordinance allowing the city to access the
first-class cities without a merit system. criminal justice database system.
Response: The League of Minnesota While cities can access criminal history
Cities supports the Legislature background information for employment
undertaking a study of Minnesota's purposes through the BCA directly, it is
veterans preference law to determine its more time consuming and costly to do so.
effectiveness and efficiency in light of In addition, the BCA is currently charging
today's employment laws, statutes, and cities a higher fee than that charged to non-
regulations, and to consider possible profit organizations for running criminal
modifications to current laws. history background checks.
The League also supports a change to Using local police department access to the
limit the right of appeal for veterans criminal justice database maintained by the
employed by cities who are subject to a BCA to conduct employment background
probationary period until after the checks is an effective use of local resources.
probationary period has passed. It is one strategy that cities can use to help
keep costs down and provide quality
HR-18. Drug and Alcohol services.
Rehabilitation
Current law allows criminal justice
Issue: Under Minn. Stat. § 181.953, background checks on active employees (vs.
subd. 10(b), an employer cannot terminate applicants for employment) only when such
an employee for a positive controlled- employees are firefighters or work with
substance test without first providing the children. The law governing criminal
employee a chance for rehabilitation and history background checks on police and
treatment. Recently, some cities have been other city employees does not specifically
advised this law applies to "probationary" allow such checks on active employees.
employees, as well as to regular employees. Cities need the ability to be able to conduct
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 79
criminal history background checks on The Legislature previously increased the
active employees as well as applicants for statutory limits on the total exemplary
employment using the BCA or the BCA damage awards for Government Data
database access. Practices Act (GDPA) violations and also
raised the limits on the maximum civil
Response: Cities are capable of and penalties courts may impose to compel
should be allowed to continue the use of compliance with the act deemed necessary
the BCA database system at no charge for since limits had not been adjusted for many
the purpose of conducting employment years.
background checks. Cities should also be
able to conduct, but not required to Response: The Legislature should allow
conduct, criminal history background cities to charge the same amount for
checks on active employees using the BCA copies of motor vehicle incident reports
database. The laws governing issued by local police and fire
background checks for all city employees departments as the commissioner of
should be amended to allow for this public safety.
practice. For those cities that choose to
use the BCA to run the criminal history The Legislature should also allow cities to
employment background check for them, charge for the staff time that the city
the fee should be the same as that charged determines will be required to comply
to non-profit organizations. with wide-ranging data requests
regardless of whether copies of the data
Data PraCtiCes are requested. The League supports
clarification that computer passwords,
DP-1. Data Practices Compliance log-in names and e-mail addresses that
Issues individuals have to access their data
online are private. In addition, the
Issue: Cities are limited to charging only Legislature should provide a mechanism
25-cents per page for copies of police motor that would permit cities to challenge
vehicle incident reports, which does not whether the data request is reasonable
cover the city cost for copying, while the and made in good faith.
commissioner of public safety is exempt
from this restriction—thereby permitting the The League of Minnesota Cities opposes
Department of Public Safety to continue to further increases in the maximum
charge $5 for incident reports that cities are exemplary damages that courts may
required to submit to the department. impose against government entities,
including cities, found to have violated the
Cities continue to receive repetitive, overly GDPA; further increases in the
broad and far-reaching data requests that maximum civil penalty that may be
result in protracted and repeated staff time to imposed when a court order is issued to
locate government records, redact private compel a government entity to comply
data or data unrelated to the request, and with GDPA; or any statutory change that
assemble documents to be provided in order would make it a mandatory civil penalty
to comply with requirements to provide to compel compliance under the GDPA.
access to public government data. The League supports enactment of the
administrative remedies provisions
adopted by the 2010 Legislature to
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 80
address disputes regarding GDPA local units of government should not have
compliance issues. their contact information disclosed to
third parties for marketing, soliciting,
DP-2 Data Req�ests for Citizen campaigning or other purposes by
Contact Information operation of the Data Practices Act. The
Legislature should amend the Data
Issue: Cities have seen an increase in data Practices Act to make citizen contact
requests for the email addresses of any and information not accessible to the public.
all citizens who have contacted the city to
conduct business, register a complaint, DP-3 Maintaining Government
express an opinion about a city service, or Data in Large Databases
simply to receive general information from
the city via email. Once disclosed, the email Issue: The Minnesota Department of
addresses can then be used for marketing, Administration Advisory Opinion 10-016
soliciting, campaigning, or commercial issued in June 2010 maintains that the data
purposes. Citizens have expressed practices act requires cities to keep records
frustration that the act of contacting their containing public government data so that
city government makes their email addresses they can be easily accessible and convenient
available to any third party who makes a to use, regardless of how they are kept.
data practices request. Email addresses and Cities maintain that the application of this
other contact information are public data advisory opinion to large databases in which
under the Data Practices Act, and cities are recards are kept in an electronic format
required to provide the requested forces cities to risk the daily threat of
information to any person requesting it. allegations of noncompliance or leaves local
government officials confused regarding
The intent of the Data Practices Act is to how to apply the requirement for access to
ensure that government is transparent and data in circumstances where information
accountable to its citizens, not to create an technology is utilized to facilitate the
inexpensive data mine of contact management and organization of records
information for unwelcome use by third and information which often includes public,
parties. The use of email and other private and nonpublic data within individual
technology such as phone and text data sets.
messaging to communicate with citizens,
either individually or as a group, is an Response: Cities insist that it is not
efficient and cost-effective way for feasible to separate public from non-
government to transmit information about public data when the records in which
city services and should be encouraged. that data is held are in electronic format
Citizens should be encouraged to contact and held in large databases that are
their local governments to express concerns intended to provide secure data storage
and ask questions. The release of citizen and maintenance, but are not directly
contact information to third parties available in a form in which public and
undermines trust in government and makes private data contained in those records
it less likely that citizens will contact can be separated. Requiring cities to
government. design such databases to accommodate
extensive data requests under
Response: Citizens who submit their Government Data Practices Act (GDPA)
email addresses or phone numbers to
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 81
is both financially and technologically to assist local police in solving crimes that
nearly impossible to achieve. have already taken place.
The Legislature should address the School boards are responsible to have
growing and costly impact on cities of policies in place that require school officials
providing access to specific public data to report a student who possesses an
housed in large electronic databases. unlawful firearm to law enforcement or the
Cities also require discretion in juvenile justice system. But schools are not
determining that the release of certain allowed to release the name of a student in
incident data could identify an individual dangerous weapon reports involving use or
whose identity must be protected. possession of such weapons that are made to
the Minnesota Department of Education.
DP-4. Sharing of Student Data with
Local Law Enforcement in Response: Minn. Stat. § 13.32 should be
Emergencies clarified to allow local law enforcement
agencies to work with school officials to
Issue: Minn. Stat. § 13.32, subd. 3(1) jointly make the determination that an
defines education data as private data that emergency or risk of harm exists in order
must not be disclosed except to the juvenile to enable police enforcement actions to be
justice system in cases where information taken in a timely manner.
about the behavior of a student who poses a
risk of harm is reasonably necessary to DP-5. Disclosure of Victim Data
protect the health or safety of the student or Issue: Under the Data Practices Act, the
other individuals. In addition, the federal name and address of a victim or casualty of
Family Education Rights & Privacy Act an accident or incident to which a law
(FERPA) bars schools from disclosing
information on student educational records enforcement agency responds is public
that contains personally identifiable government data. In addition, the name and
information without consent of a parent or location of the health care facility to which
eligible student, with only limited victims or casualties are taken is public
government data. The Data Practices Act
exceptions. allows for a crime victim to prevent the
Minn. Stat. § 13.32 does not adequately disclosure of public data, but no such
define who is responsible for making the provision exists for accident victims.
determination that an emergency or risk of Accident victims and their families can be
harm exists. As a result, school district traumatized by the events that caused their
officials have interpreted the statute in injuries. Publicly disclosing their identities
conjunction with the restrictions in FERPA and the location where they are receiving
to require that the determination be made medical care places a burden on families and
solely by school officials. victims who may be questioned by reporters,
solicited by lawyers, and contacted by other
Local police officials are often frustrated in members of the community. While there are
their efforts to investigate allegations of legitimate public policy reasons to make this
criminal or other illegal activity when school information public, the Data Practices Act
officials refuse, under Minn. Stat. § 13.32, provides no discretion for city officials and
subd. 3(1) and FERPA, to provide law enforcement to temporarily withhold
information to follow up such complaints or victim data when releasing it is not in the
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 82
best interest of the victims. This not only provide that a copy of all public
makes the initial period of recovery more documents discussed or referenced during
difficult for victims, but erodes the trust city council meetings conducted by
between victims and state and local conference call be made available to the
government. public and that the use of such technology
be expanded for official meetings other
Response: The Legislature should amend than those permitted in emergencies and
Minn. Stat. § 13.82 of the Data Practices during pandemics.
Act to temporarily prohibit the disclosure
of victim data if the victim or victim's
family specifically requests not to be
identified publicly, and the agency or
local government reasonably determines
that access to the data would cause
emotional or physical harm to the
individual or otherwise impede the
individual's recovery.
DP-6. Open Meeting Law
Issue: Mobile wireless devices and new
technologies are creating circumstances in
which city officials receive and transmit
electronic communications, raising
questions regarding the use of emerging
inter-active web-based video and audio
applications to conduct official meetings.
Response: The League of Minnesota
Cities opposes any change to the open
meeting law that would expand the award
of attorney's fees to unintentional
violations.
In addition, the League encourages the
Legislature to modify current law to
authorize cities to conduct official
meetings using interactive wireless or
online technology to allow local elected
officials to participate and the public to
hear and/or view all discussion, testimony
and voting during the meeting for which
use of interactive television transmission
is now permitted in Minn. Stat. § 13D.01.
The League also supports technical
changes to the open meeting law to
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 83
Federal Employment Law employees from participating in this
program.
FED-1. Consolidated Omnibus
Budget Reconciliation Act Response: The League of Minnesota
(COBRA) Cities supports legislation that would
allow employees to roll unused funds over
Issue: The federal Consolidated Omnibus to the next plan year, or into a tax-
Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA) law, Qualified retirement plan, or a 457 plan.
which requires employers to offer continued FED -4 . Reserve Income
health and dental insurance group benefits
after an employee terminates, has been Replacement Program (RIRP)
interpreted to apply to Employee Assistance Issue: Since the September 1 l, 2001,
Programs (EAPs), health funding
mechanisms such as Health Reimbursement terrorist attacks, the federal government has
Arrangements (HRA)/Voluntary Employee relied heavily on state National Guard and
Benefit Accounts (VEBAs), and flexible other military reserve forces to fight the war
benefits. The application of COBRA on terrorism. A number of these citizen-
benefits to these programs results in unlikely soldiers have experienced a loss of income
and impractical outcomes. while serving on active duty, which has
caused financial hardship for some of these
Response: Congress should clarify the members and their families.
intended benefits to which COBRA law
should apply, excluding programs such as Congress recently enacted the Reserve
EAPs, HRA/VEBAs, and flexible benefits. Income Replacement Program (RIRP) to
provide monthly income differential
FED Medicare/Medicaid payments to National Guard and military
reserve members who are involuntarily
Premium Disbursements serving on active duty. These payments are
Issue: Minnesota continues to be a net loser intended to bridge the gap between the
in federal Medicare and Medicaid premium average monthly civilian earned income of
disbursements. the member before mobilization and the
member s total monthly military
Response: Congress must recognize this compensation while involuntarily mobilized.
disparity and provide Minnesota with a This program is of benefit to cities because
more balanced and representative share it reduces the financial stress placed on city
of the costs of providing health care employees called up to serve and minimizes
under Medicaid and Medicare. the distraction from their duties before
leaving and upon return to the job. The
FED-3. Flexible Spending Accounts RIRP program was extended to December
31,�2012.�
Issue: Health care costs are rising
dramatically and employees need financial Response: It is the federal government's
relie£ Flexible spending accounts provide responsibility to minimize the financial
some relief, but the current "use it or lose it" hardship placed on state National Guard
provision for medical spending discourages and military reserve members who are
ordered to federal active service. The
League of Minnesota Cities urges
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 84
Congress to extend the RIRP program extent practicable, to the opinion of affected
beyond 2012. employee organizations."
FED-5. IRS Regulations on Death Response: The League of Minnesota
Benefits Cities opposes the federal collective
bargaining bill for public sector
Issue: Current IRS regulations do not allow employees. Public sector collective
any type of death benefit to be included in a bargaining should be left to the
post-employment health savings plan and determination of each state.
other tax-free funding vehicles. If the
employee who owns the savings plan
account dies, he or she cannot leave the
remaining funds to a designated beneficiary
(unless the beneficiary is a spouse or
dependent child). If the employee does not
have a spouse or dependent child, the funds
are typically redistributed among plan
participants. A death benefit provision is an
attractive feature for many employee groups.
Response: IRS regulations should be
changed to allow post-employment health
savings plans and other tax-free vehicles
for both active employees and retirees to
include a provision that allows the
employee to designate beneficiaries in
addition to spouses or children.
FED-6. Federal Public 5afety
Collective Bargaining Bill
Issue: Congress is considering a bill that
would require all states to establish
collective bargaining procedures for all
public safety employees. The bill directs the
Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA)
to determine, state by state, whether it meets
the bill's requirements with regard to
collective bargaining rights for public safety
employees. While it appears Minnesota is
likely to pass the tests set out by the bill,
federal public sector lobbyists have
expressed serious concern that the bill is
very much open to interpretation. In
addition, the bill directs the FLRA to
"consider and give weight, to the maximum
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 85
IMPROVING FISCAL FUTURES
FF-1. State-Local Fiscal Relations b) Certainty. Cities need to have more
certainty and predictability in all of
Issue: Since the 1970s, services provided by their available revenue sources,
Minnesota cities have been largely funded including the property tag and the
through a combination of property taxes, amount of funding they receive from
state aids, and state property tax relief local government aid and similar
programs. This system of municipal finance programs. The current practice of
has evolved to ensure that municipal almost annual adjustments to local
services can be funded without excessive government aid (LGA) and similar
local tax burdens. programs, recent unallotments of the
appropriation and the imposition of
In recent years, the state-local partnership levy limits do not allow for prudent
has eroded under the stress of state budget financial planning and decisions. In
deficits and an emerging belief among addition, the 2011 state government
legislators that cities should be more shutdown further decreased the
financially independent. If this trend certainty of the system when the
continues, further reductions in state aid to Department of Revenue indicated that
cities will create fiscal problems for many despite the standing LGA
communities already struggling with the appropriation, the shutdown of many
effects of recent aid reductions and the shift state government operations would
away from an interdependent state-local prevent the distribution of the LGA.
fiscal policy. c) Adequacy. The revenue sources
available to cities and the state must
Response: The League of Minnesota raise adequate funds to meet city
Cities supports a strong state-local fiscal needs, to fund mandates, and to
partnership. The state-local fiscal system, maintain Minnesota's long-term
and any future modifications, should be competitiveness.
consistent with the following principles: d) Flexibility. As cities become
increasingly diverse in their
a) Accountability. Cities believe a viable characteristics and as existing aid and
partnership with the state requires credit programs have eroded, a"one-
cities and the state to communicate size-fits-all" system that limits all
effectively with each other and with cities to the property tax as the major,
the public about their roles and non-state aid revenue source is
responsibilities. Cities and the state increasingly unworkable. Some cities
must also exercise sound financial have sufficient property tax base to
stewardship, including maximizing sustain an adequate service level, but
efficiencies in service delivery and many do not. Cities should have
other means of cost containment greater access to other tax and
whenever possible. revenue sources than currently
permitted.
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 86
e) Equiry. All citizens should receive elimination of programs such as the market
adequate levels of municipal services value homestead credit. Unfortunately, the
at relatively similar levels of taxation. state has also relied extensively on short-
This means that the state should term solutions that have only shifted a large
provide financial assistance to cities share of the deficit problem into the next
that have high costs, including costs biennium. For example, the 2011 special
related to overburden created by non- session budget solution shifted more than $2
resident users of city services, low billion in school aid payments, cut state
fiscal capacity, or both. State spending by $2 billion, borrowed $640
�nancial assistance should also reduce million in future state revenues through the
tax burden disparities among use of tobacco bonds and depleted the
communities and between cities and state's already slim reserves by $179
surrounding areas. million.
FF-2. Economic Contributions by Despite deep and permanent cuts in city aid
Cities programs, the state budget problems have
not been fully resolved. For the 2014-2015
Issue: Cities provide and maintain the biennial budget, the state general fund
physical infrastructure as well as the social budget deficit is currently projected to be
and economic infrastructure necessary to approximately $1 billion. When inflationary
support a large share of the state's economic pressure on state expenditures is considered,
activity. In addition, cities play a major role the effective budget shortfall could rise by
in statewide economic development an additional $1.1 billion.
activities that assist businesses with
expansion and job creation. The importance Response: To address future state budget
of cities to the overall vitality of the state's deficits, the Legislature:
economy is frequently overlooked in state
policy discussions. a) Must consider all options, including
revenue increases, with a particular
Response: To provide lawmakers with focus on changes that increase state
information on the economic activity revenues and improve the stability of
occurring within cities, the Department of the state's revenue stream.
Revenue should annually collect and b) Must not further reduce funding for
compile information on major state tax property tax relief programs to cities.
collections within each city, in addition to c) Must not further accelerate the
county and regional reports. remittance of sales taz collections by
retailers including municipal liquor
FF-3 State Budget Stability operations, and should make steps to
reverse past accelerations.
Issue: In recent years, the Legislature has d) Must consider the aggregate impact of
regularly struggled to solve a series of recent budget cuts in order to enact a
projected budget deficits. Past actions to balanced response for taxpayers.
address these deficits have included changes e) Must reinstate estimates of
in the state budget, including permanent inflationary increases to expenditure
reductions in funding to local units of estimates.
government for programs such as local fl Should build at a minimum, a five-
government aid as well as the full percent budget reserve and should
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 87
establish state budget stability as a FF-5 Local Government Aid
state priority. This includes Reform
prioritizing stability ahead of sending
back tax rebate checks as was done in Issue: The Local Government Aid (LGA)
2000. program was created as a component of the
g) Should modify the unallotment statute larger property tax reform passed in 1972
to place a reasonable statutory limit known as the "Minnesota Miracle." Prior to
on the percentage and timing of the 1971, the state maintained a number of
state's budget that can be unallotted smaller state aid programs, many of which
during a biennium without legislative were "shared tax" programs which
approval. distributed aid based solely on the
h) Must emphasize long-term budget geographic location where the revenue was
solutions and budget stability and the collected. In contrast, the LGA program was
continuation of state government established to provide aid to cities based on
operations. differences in "need" and differences in
i) The League of Minnesota Cities "ability" to raise revenue. Although the
supports the principle of LGA formula's measures of need and ability
representative democracy and opposes to pay have been modified over the years,
limiting the Legislature's flexibility in the general goals of the formula have been
making financial decisions through to equalize tax bases, assist cities with
new Constitutional amendments. service "overburden" and to reduce the
overall reliance of cities on the property tax.
FF Funding Local Government
Aid The last major update of the LGA system
occurred in 2002. With the recent state
Issue: Local government aid (LGA) is an budget cuts and the availability of newly
important component in the state's property updated decennial Census data, many
tax relief system. To avoid undue pressure policymakers, including the governor, have
on the property tax, funding for LGA must discussed updating or reforming the LGA
keep pace with inflationary pressures. program.
However, since 2003, LGA has been
repeatedly cut by action of the Legislature Response: The League of Minnesota
and governor. In 2010 alone, cities Cities supports the ongoing efforts of the
experienced a reduction of more than $180 legislative study of the current LGA
million in revenues from these programs and formula as well as the work of the Mayors
in the 2011 special legislative session, LGA Tax Reform Advisory Group on Local
was retroactively and permanently reduced Government Aid. The League supports
by $102 million per year beginning in 2011. the goal of increasing the stability and
predictability of the formula while
Response: In order to reduce pressure on identifying a new system or modi�cations
the property tax, and to equalize property to the existing system to address current
tax bases, the League of Minnesota Cities formula deficiencies.
continues to support an increase in the
LGA appropriation to at least the level The legislative LGA study group and the
that would have been provided prior to Mayors Tax Reform Advisory Group on
the 2003 cuts, including the restoration of Local Government Aid should consider
the annual intlation adjustment. information on state tax collections within
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 88
each city, in addition to the county and administer or contract with the private
regional reports. sector for the service if the state cannot
provide the service at a reasonable cost.
A new LGA system should be a
functioning formula that considers easily FF-7 Reporti�g Requirements
measurable need and capacity factors
that are examined and updated regularly Issue: Budget and financial reporting
and should reduce tax burden disparities requirements imposed on cities by the state
among cities and between cities and often result in duplication and additional
townships, and acknowledge the impact costs. In addition to the state mandated
of tax exempt properties on city services annual audits under Minn. Stat. § 471.697-
and funding. .698, cities are required to prepare and
submit or publish numerous other budget
The League will evaluate the LGA reform and financial reports including but not
recommendations of these two groups limited to:
based on these objectives as well as the
objectives of accountability, certainty, a) Summary budget reports (Minn. Stat. §
adequacy, flegibility and equity outlined 6.745);
in the policy FF-1. b) Treasurers report to the city clerk (Minn.
Stat. § 412.141);
FF-6. State Charges for c) Statement of tax collections and other
Administrative Services income by clerk to the city council
(Minn. Stat. § 471.69);
Issue: Currently, some state agencies have d) Report on outstanding obligations and
wide discretion in setting the fees for special the purpose for each issue filed with the
services they provide to local governments. county auditor (Minn. Stat. § 471.70);
With recent state budget reductions, state e) Publication of summary budget
agencies could turn to charges and fees to statement (Minn. Stat. § 471.6965);
replace lost revenues. Increases in charges � Publication of statement of liquor store
and fees would place additional fiscal operations (Minn. Stat. § 477A.017);
hardship on cities that have already g) Liquor store audited financial statements
experienced severe losses of local (Minn. Stat. § 471.6985);
government aid (LGA) and the elimination h) TIF district plan and amendments (Minn.
of market value homestead credit (MVHC). Stat. § 469.175, subd. 4a);
i) TIF district annual disclosure (Minn.
Response: State agencies should be Stat. § 469.175, subd. 5);
required to justify their service fees or for j) TIF district annual financial report
increases in existing service fees and not (Minn. Stat. § 469.175, subd. 6);
charge more than what is fair, reasonable, k) Business subsidy reporting (Minn. Stat.
and proportionate to the cost of service. § 116J.993 through 116J.995);
Agencies should give adequate notice of 1) State required financial activity reports
increases to allow local governments to (Minn. Stat. § 6.74);
budget for the increases. State agencies m) Local improvement requirements (Minn.
should set administrative service fees as Stat. § 429.031);
close as possible to the marginal cost of n) Development and permit fees report
providing the service. Local government (Minn. Stat. § 326B.145);
should be given the option to self-
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 89
o) Utility annual financial statements payments to nearly all cities were cut or
(Minn. Stat. § 412.381); eliminated to reduce state expenditures and
p) Housing and redevelopment authority balance the state's budget imbalance. These
annual financial report (Minn. Stat. § MVHC reimbursement reductions had the
469.013); and effect of reducing each affected city's
q) Federal single audit or a program- property tax levy collections.
specific audit (31 U.S.C.A. § 7502
(a)(1)). The 2011 Legislature and governor passed a
law that repealed the existing market value
Response: Requirements for reporting homestead credit and the associated
and advertising financial and budget reimbursement payments to local units of
information should be carefully weighed government effective for taxes payable in
to balance the need for information with 2012. To buffer the effects of this change on
the administrative costs of compiling and homeowners, the Legislature enacted a new
submitting this information. In addition, homestead market value exclusion system
the legislature should direct all state that reduces the value on which qualifying
agencies to review existing local homeowners pay property taxes. This new
government reporting mandates and exclusion system shifted tax burdens to
eliminate redundant or superfluous other property types including businesses
requirements. To this point, the and apartments that do not receive the value
Legislature should consolidate municipal exclusion. These property tax shifts have
government financial reporting raised concerns and suggestions that the
requirements in the Office of State former system should be restored.
Auditor, include an electronic submission
alternative to any remaining paper filing Response: The League of Minnesota
requirements and authorize the use of Cities supports providing additional
web publication where newspaper property tax relief directly to
publication is currently required. Finally, homeowners through an expansion of the
the legislature must not increase property tax relief (PTR) program, the
reporting burdens for local units of targeting program or other programs
government. Any new reporting that provide property tax relief directly
requirement should have a clearly defined from the state to taxpayers. In addition,
statement of purpose and public need not the League supports legislative
currently met with existing reports, a modifications to these programs to
sunset date to facilitate a future eliminate the taxpayer filing requirement
discussion of the usefulness of the thereby making the tax relief payments
requirement as well as full state funding automatic.
for the costs associated with a new
reporting mandate. The League opposes property tax credit
programs that reimburse local units of
FF-8. Direct Property Tax Relief government for reduced tax burden such
Programs as the former market value homestead
credit system due to the fact that the
Issue: In recent years, qualifying reimbursements to local units of
homeowners continued to see the full government can be cut while the credit to
homestead credit on their property tax the taxpayer remains on the property tax
statement even though the reimbursement statement. In addition, the League
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 90
opposes reinstituting Limited Market contractor installs the equipment, however,
Value, a program that reduces the taxable cities and other entities must pay the tax and
value of individual properties based on follow an elaborate process to receive a
assessor's valuation increase. Limited refund. This process includes a requirement
Market Value creates inequities between for an up-front written agreement appointing
similar properties based solely on the the contractor as the purchasing agent. Many
valuation increase determined by the cities and other entities fail to follow the
assessor. process properly or are unaware of the
process until after the project has been
FF-9. Sales Tax on Local initiated, resulting in a forfeiture of the tax
Government Purchases exemption.
Issue: When the state was experiencing a Response: The League of Minnesota
budget shortfall in 1992, the Legislature Cities supports legislation that would
repealed the sales tax exemption for city, convert the capital equipment sales tax
county and township purchases but exemption from a refund to an up-front
preserved the school district exemption. exemption at the time of the purchase of
Cities now pay state sales tax on purchases the equipment. At minimum, state law
like road maintenance supplies and should be modified to simplify the process
equipment, wastewater treatment facilities, by allowing the exempt entity to be
and some public safety equipment. Although eligible for the refund, even if the
many township purchases were exempted in application is submitted after the project
2011, this tax currently costs local property has been initiated.
taxpayers and ratepayers across the state
more than $100 million annually. FF-11. Taxation of Electronic
Commerce
Response: The state should reinstate the
sales tax exemption for all local Issue: Sales over the Internet and through
government purchases. The exemption other electronic means are projected to
must not be coupled with cuts in local increase exponentially over the next several
government aid (LGA) or other state- years. Electronic transactions pose
shared revenues. significant tax-policy challenges because of
the difficulty of assigning a location to
Any future expansion of the sales tax base electronic sales and because many Internet
should exempt purchases by cities. Any goods are not tangible property.
sales tag study conducted by the
Department of Revenue or the Response: Federal tax policy should not
Legislature should review the practice of place main street businesses at a
local units of government paying sales competitive disadvantage to electronic
tax. retailers, must not jeopardize repayment
of bonds backed by state and local sales
FF-10. Sales Tax on Capital tax revenues, and should ensure stability
Equipment in state and local revenues. To address the
challenges created by the growth of
Issue: Purchases of capital equipment used electronic commerce, the League of
in the production of taxable goods are Minnesota Cities supports the multi-state
exempt from Minnesota sales tax. When a
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 91
effort to develop a streamlined sales tax still questions on the application of the new
system. law.
The League also supports federal Response: The League of Minnesota
legislation, such as the Main Street Cities opposes legislation that grants
Fairness Act, which would provide OTCs a tax exemption that terminates
congressional authority for states that existing, or bars future obligations to pay
comply with the Streamlined Sales and hotel taxes to state and local governments,
Use Tax Agreement to require remote or otherwise restrict legal actions by
retailers to collect and remit state sales states and localities.
taxes.
FF-13. Taxation of Electric
In the absence of Congressional action to Generation Personal Property
require remote retailers to collect and
remit state sales taxes, the League Issue: Investor-owned utilities (IOUs) have
supports proposals such as the affiliate a longstanding relationship with Minnesota
nexus initiative that would extend state cities. IOUs site baseload power plants in
sales tax collection responsibilities to host communities, and in exchange pay
certain remote retailers by creating a personal property tax on attached generation
rebuttable presumption that a remote machinery to the cities, counties and school
retailer maintains a place of business in districts hosting the plants. These plants
the state if they enter into an agreement bring jobs to our communities, but they also
with a solicitor for the referral of create nuisances such as air pollution,
Minnesota customers for a fee. nuclear waste, noise, vibration, and coal
train traffic. They also create security risks
FF-12. Online Travel Companies and take up land that could be used for
and Local Hotel Occupancy Taxes other, less disruptive commercial and
industrial development. Cities believe
Issue: In the past, online travel companies personal property taxes paid by IOUs are a
(OTCs) were collecting hotel occupancy fair compensation for the environmental and
taxes from consumers but only remitting a economic costs of hosting baseload power
fraction of the taxes collected to local and plants.
state governments. OTCs are seeking
federal legislation to relieve them from their IOUs argue that personal property tax relief
obligations and deprive state and local is important to pass along to their
governments of virtually all hotel taxes. The shareholders and ratepayers. However, only
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities a few IOU shareholders and ratepayers
estimates the minimum annual revenue loss actually live in the communities hosting
to local and state governments under the baseload power plants. Further, almost all
OTC's proposal will exceed $1 billion and new power plants receive personal property
increase to $8.5 billion annually if hotels tax exemptions from the Legislature, while
adopt the OTC's business model. The 2011 host communities with existing, non-exempt
Legislature made clarifications under Minn. baseload plants will continue to have them
Stat. § 297A.61 and 297A.66 that defines for decades to come.
"accommodations intermediary" and
requires them to collect the sales tax on the Response: Personal property tages on
total charge to the customer, but there are attached electric generation machinery
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 92
are a fair way to spread the real property for electrical generation was
environmental and economic costs of exempted from the market value of utilities.
electric generation power plants among The incentive value of this benefit is low
all IOU shareholders and ratepayers. The because utility companies are often required
League of Minnesota Cities supports the to install the equipment anyway. In
continuation of personal property taxes addition, these companies frequently recover
paid by IOUs to host communities for the cost of the equipment through rate riders
existing and new facilities. granted by the Public Utilities Commission.
Allowing the pollution control equipment
FF-14 Taxation of Municipal Bond exemption places the cost of this equipment
Interest on the citizens of the host community, rather
than the purchasers of electricity.
Issue: The federal and state laws that grant a
tax exemption to bondholders for municipal Response: The pollution control
bond interest lowers borrowing costs for exemption places an undue burden on
cities and reduces property t� levies. host communities without incentivizing
the environmentally responsible behavior
Response: Congress and the state should that it was originally created to
maintain the tax exemption for municipal encourage. The League of Minnesota
bond interest income. Cities supports narrowing or eliminating
the pollution control equipment
FF-15. Pollution Control exemption for investor owned electric
Exemption generation facilities. The League would
also support allowing utilities to recover
Issue: Minnesota grants electric utilities their costs relating to the pollution control
and several other industries a property tax equipment by spreading those costs to
exemption for personal and real property electricity users.
that is primarily used for pollution control.
Minnesota adopted the property tax FF-16 State Support for Municipal
exemption that now extends to electrical Energy Policy Goals
generation systems, agricultural operations,
and wastewater treatment facilities in 1967, Issue: The State of Minnesota has adopted
before water and air pollution were heavily an energy policy focusing on the promotion
regulated by the Environmental Protection of energy efficiency and the expansion of
Agency and the Minnesota Pollution Control renewable energy with the goal of achieving
Agency. The language and the purpose of a reduction in carbon generation through
these statutes have evolved through the reduced use of fossil fuels. Minnesota cities
years. When states first began adopting share this goal, but already strained budgets
these taa� incentives in the 1960s, they hoped and reserves at the state and local level have
to encourage utilities, industrial plants, and limited the ability of the state to assist local
others to install pollution control equipment. units of government in furthering specific
Gradually, as regulation increased, states projects that support the overall state goal.
adopted the exemptions to help companies In addition, institutional knowledge and
offset the cost of the equipment. capacity of most cities limits their ability to
explore energy efficiency or renewable
This tax benefit erodes local tax bases. In energy projects, even projects whose energy
2007, more than $1 billion of personal and
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 93
"payback" could finance project capital taxes that were formerly collected and used
costs. to support the public improvements in the
TIF district can no longer be collected at the
Response: The League of Minnesota same rate and used to support ongoing
Cities calls on our legislators and state general city operations.
executive agencies charged with
accomplishing the state's energy policy With the conversion of the market value
goals to assist cities, townships and homestead credit to the new homestead
counties with tailored efforts to identify market value exclusion, a number of levy
appropriate energy efficiency and restrictions based on market value related to
renewable energy projects for specific functions such as economic
undertaking at the local level. State Law development authorities (Minn. Stat §
should allow and support utility grant 469.107), housing and redevelopment
and loan programs and Property authorities (Minn. Stat § 469.033) and port
Assessed Clean Energy Programs, both authorities (Minn. Stat § 469.053) may
publically and privately funded. inadvertently experience a reduction in their
levy authority. In addition, debt limits based
The state should create a grant and loan on market value may be similarly reduced.
program to offset start-up capital The impacts on these entities will vary
expenses for projects identified where the significantly from jurisdiction to jurisdiction
savings in energy costs can offset capital based on the number and market value of
project costs or where projects are needed homesteads within the jurisdiction. These
to meet state energy policy goals. The levy limits and debt limits were converted to
state should clarify that cities may use a percentage of market value to avoid
public utility franchise agreements to having indirect legislative actions, such as
advance state energy policy goals. class rate changes, from decreasing or
Additionally, state efforts should increasing levy or debt authority.
recognize that the availability of state
energy agency technical expertise should Response: City councils are elected to
be made available to cities at no cost. make decisions about local budgets and
meeting community needs and despite
FF-17. State Restrictions on Local four years of deep cuts in state aid and
Budgets credit reimbursements, recent city levy
increases have been well below the
Issue: During the 2008 legislative session, previous ten-year average. It is
levy limits were imposed on cities over inappropriate for the Legislature to
2,500 population for three years. Levy limits undermine local decision-making and
replace local accountability with a state accountability through the continued
judgment about the appropriate level of local imposition of levy limits or proposals such
taxation and local services. Additionally, as the "taxpayers' bill of rights." The
state restrictions on local budgets can have a League of Minnesota Cities supports the
negative effect on a city's bond rating due to principle of representative democracy
the restriction on revenue flexibility. that allows city councils to formulate local
budgets without state restrictions.
Levy limits also fail to account for the
decertification of tax increment financing Levy limits based on market value,
districts. Upon decertification, the property including those impacting economic
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 94
development authorities, housing and negotiations, the impact of new and
redevelopment authorities and port existing federal or state mandates
authorities and debt limits based on including administrative rules, or other
market value should be clarified to non-discretionary budget factors.
require that the calculation be computed
on market value of the jurisdiction before The 2009 tax hearing and notification
the homestead market value exclusion. changes should be carefully reviewed to
assure that the legislative intent is
FF-18. Tax Hearing and reflected in the amended statutes. The
Notification Process exception to the tax hearing and
notification requirements for cities with
Issue: Cities must set a preliminary levy by more than 500 residents and a proposed
September 15, which is the levy used to levy increase below the implicit price
compute the parcel-specific property tax deflator (IPD) should be reinstated.
notification forms. With only a few limited
exemptions (voter-approved levies, levies In order to assist local officials with the
for natural disasters and levies for certain challenge of explaining legislative changes
tort judgments), this preliminary levy, by to the property tax system, legislators
law, becomes the maximum that cities can should attend and be encouraged to
levy the following year. As a result, cities participate in local government budget
may be unable to budget for unforeseen hearings in their districts.
needs that arise after September 15.
FF-19. City Fund Balances
The 2009 Legislature eliminated the
separate tax hearing requirement and Issue: As a component of a prudent
replaced it with a requirement that the public financial management plan, cities maintain a
be allowed to speak at a regularly scheduled fund balance composed of cash flow funds,
meeting on the budget and tax levy. These savings for projects, rainy day reserves to
changes erroneously repealed an exception maintain high level bond ratings, and to
to the tax hearing and notification process minimize borrowing costs. Although the size
for cities adopting their levies at or less than of a city's fund balance should be
the current rate of inflation. determined through local financial needs
and local preferences, some cities are being
With the major property tax changes enacted criticized for maintaining "excessive"
by the Legislature in 2011, city officials reserves.
have found it difficult to explain to local
taxpayers not only the effects of their budget The Office of the State Auditor (OSA)
and levy decisions but also the separate report measures city fund balances on
effects of the actions of the state Legislature. December 31, shortly after the city receives
its largest sources of revenue from the
Response: Cities should have the property tax and state aid distributions. To
authority to increase the final levy from measure at this time, however, yields a
the preliminary levy with the approval of picture of a high fund balance even though
the commissioner of the Department of the city will spend down these funds to cash
Revenue, to meet additional, unforeseen flow the next five to six months of its
and uncontrollable needs, including operations.
arbitrator awards resulting from labor
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 95
Response: The state should respect local law should, in addition to eliminating
decisions on adequacy of local fund state approval for local sales taxes, be
balances. The League of Minnesota Cities modified to generally authorize any city
opposes any attempt to divert local to impose other types of taxes such as a
reserves to benefit the state budget. local payroll tax or an entertainment tag
with the adoption of a supporting
FF-20 City Revenue Diversification resolution by the city council and after
approval by the voters at a general or
Issue: Under current state law, the property special election.
tax is the only generally accessible form of
local tax revenue for cities. Lack of adequate In addition, cities should be able to
growth in state aid programs and the deep modify the use of their local lodging tax
cuts that have occurred over the past four revenues and have general authority to
years will almost certainly lead to a create utilities, similar to the storm sewer
significant increase in city reliance on utility authority, in order to fund local
property taxes in the future. Allowing cities services where benefit or usage of the
to diversify their revenue, stream would service can be measured.
prevent rapid rises in property taxes.
FF-21. Local Option Sales Tax
The basic public finance rationale for
diversification of local tax systems is rooted Issue: Under Minn. Stat. § 297A.99, the
in the fact that economists generally agree Legislature has created a set of local sales
that there is no perfect tax. Each tax has tax rules and a defined process by which
unique strengths and weaknesses and the cities and other political subdivisions can
more intensively any single tax type is used, impose a general local option sales tax.
the more obvious its shortcomings become. Although the statutory process requires the
For example, the property tax is generally city council to adopt a resolution supporting
regarded as being very stable throughout the the local sales tax and also requires the city
economic cycle and it is considered to be a to seek voter approval of the sales tax at a
relatively easy tax to administer and enforce. general election, the process continues to
However, when property tax burdens require the final authorization of the local
become too high, there may be negative sales tax by the Legislature through the
consequences for other public policy passage of a special law. During the 2011
objectives such as business development and session, nine cities successfully sought
home ownership. legislative authorization to impose new local
sales taxes or to amend an existing local
In addition to avoiding the problems created sales tax. As a result, there are now 31 cities
by excessive reliance on any single tax, a that impose a general local sales tax.
balanced and diversified revenue system for
Minnesota cities may create a more 2011 Minn. Laws l Spec. Sess. ch. 7
favorable business climate and provide for included a provision that prohibits a l�cal
greater stability of revenues to the recipient government that is seeking a local sales tax
government unit throughout the course of from advertising or expending funds for the
the economic cycle. promotion of a referendum to support
imposing a local option sales tax. The new
Response: Cities should be able to restriction also states that a political
diversify their sources of revenues. State subdivision may only expend funds to
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 96
conduct the referendum. This new restriction FF-22 City Franchise Authority
raises the question as to whether cities can
use public funds to educate and inform the Issue: Under Minn. Stat. ch. 216B and
public on the issue. Unlike the 2008 Minn. Stat. § 301B.01, a ciTy may require a
moratorium, this new language does not public utility furnishing gas or electric utility
sunset. services or occupying streets, highways or
other public property within a municipality
Response: The League of Minnesota to obtain a franchise to operate within the
� Cities continues to support a statutory community. In addition, cable system
change that will allow a city to enact a operators are required to obtain a franchise
local sales tax for public improvements, under Minn. Stat. ch. 238.
including but not limited to those
specified in the 2011 legislation: Under a franchise, the city may require the
utility to pay a fee to the municipality to
a) Convention or civic centers; help offset public maintenance costs for the
b) Public libraries; public property and generate a return on a
c) Parks, trails, and recreational publicly held asset. The fee is intended as a
facilities; mechanism by which gas or electric utilities
d) Overpasses, arterial and collector with facilities occupying the public streets
roads, or bridges, on, adjacent to, or and highways compensate the city for the
connecting to a Minnesota state use of a valuable public asset and/or for the
highway; increased maintenance and reconstruction
e) Railroad overpasses or crossing safety costs associated with having facilities in the
improvements; right-of-way.
fl Flood control and protection;
g) Water quality projects to address State law currently allows the franchise fee
groundwater and drinking water to be based upon gross operating revenues
pollution problems; or gross earnings of the utility from its
h) Court facilities; operations in the municipality. In this
i) Fire, law enforcement, or public safety manner, all utility users within the
facilities; or municipality contribute to the public costs
j) Municipal buildings. associated with the utility operation. In the
absence of franchise fees, municipal costs
Local sales taxes would follow the process resulting from utility operations are
outlined in Minn. Stat. § 297A.99 but currently being funded through the property
without the need for the approval by the tax, which is being paid for by property tax
Legislature and governor through the payers.
passage of special legislation. The League
supports allowing the referendum to be Response: Municipal authority to collect
conducted at either a general or a special franchise fee revenues from utilities is an
election. Finally, the League supports important and equitable mechanism to
modifications to clarify that cities may offset the costs of maintaining public
expend public funds to educate city right-of-way and to generate a return on
residents and businesses on the proposed a publicly held asset. Municipal franchise
local sales tag. authority must be preserved. In addition,
in situations where a local provider
decides to sell their operations, the city
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 97
must have the right of first refusal to FF-24. Payments for Services to
purchase the assets of the utility. Tax-Exempt Property
FF-23. Utility Valuation Transition Issue: Taxable property in many cities is
Aid being acquired by nonprofit and government
entities. Converting the property to tax-
Issue: In 2007 the Minnesota Department exempt status can lead to serious tax base
of Revenue revised its rules regarding the erosion without any corresponding reduction
valuation of electric and natural gas utility in the service needs created by the property.
property. This change in the rules resulted
in valuation changes for utility property that Response: Cities should have the
dramatically reduced the amount of revenue authority to collect payments from
that local governments will collect in statutorily-exempt property owners to
property tax from these utilities. cover costs of service similar to the
authority provided under the special
Recognizing that the communities that host assessment law.
these utilities bear extraordinary burdens
connected with stress on local infrastructure, FF-25. Fire Service Taxing Districts
public safety, and public nuisance due to the
presence of these facilities in their Issue: Fire service districts have the
communities, the Legislature created the potential to reduce duplication of equipment
Utility Valuation Transition Aid program. purchases and services, and to improve
This program compensates host uniformity of service delivery throughout a
communities that have lost more than 4 region. One obstacle to establishing fire
percent of their net tax capacity as a result of service districts is the absence of statutory
Department of Revenue's rule changes. authority to establish fire taxing districts.
The Legislature has granted authority for
Response: The League of Minnesota special taxing districts to provide services
Cities supports the continuation of the such as watershed management and
Utility Valuation Transition Aid program emergency medical services. In spite of
and opposes any efforts to divert growing funding and staffing challenges,
promised funds away from host this authority does not currently exist for
communities for any purpose including providing fire protection services.
balancing of the budget should there be a
budget deficit. If the Legislature does Response: The League of Minnesota
determine that is necessary to re-allocate Cities recognizes that some regions of the
the funds in the Utility Valuation state could sustain or improve fire
Transition Aid program for another protection services if fire taxing districts
purpose, the League supports other were authorized. The League supports
legislative efforts that would compensate authority for local units of government to
the host communities for the economic establish fire service taxing districts
and environmental costs of hosting these provided that 1) participation in a district
facilities. These other efforts could is a local decision, and 2) fire taxing
include, but are not limited to increasing districts must be governed by elected
the class rate on utility property to the officials representing the participating
extent that it would offset the negative entities.
effects of the utility valuation rule change.
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 98
FF-26 Housing Improvement county auditor cancels all of the local
Areas special assessments due and remaining
unpaid on each parcel which is authorized in
Issue: In 1996, cities were granted general Minn. Stat. § 282.07. Therefore, the city
authority under Minn. Stat. § 428A11 to § loses the funds previously budgeted and
428A.21 to use Housing Improvement Areas planned for to pay for the local
(HIAs) in order to finance housing improvements. To underline this point, the
improvements for condominium and funds have already been expended and if not
townhome complexes. Several cities have collected, result in losses to the city.
used this tool, and found it to be a useful
mechanism for maintaining older association when tax-forfeited land returns to private
homes. This general law sunsets on June 30, ownership, and the parcel benefitted from an
2013, which means this important funding improvement for which the city canceled
tool will expire for cities. In 2010, the special assessments because of the
Legislature passed legislation increasing the forfeiture, the city may assess or reassess the
required petition percentage from 35 to 50 parcel. But cities must go through the same
percent that is needed to file the initial cumbersome notice and hearing procedures
petition. Additionally, they increased the in order to re-attach the assessments.
percentages needed for vetoing a housing
improvement area project from 35 to 45 Response: The Legislature should remove
percent. cancellation of local special assessments
from state law, allowing cities to receive
Response: The Housing Improvement the funding validly assessed and counted
Areas statute should be made permanent. on to fund local infrastructure
Additionally, the Legislature should improvements.
consider changes to the statutes that
would clarify or add specificity to the FF-28. Distribution of Proceeds
process for using the housing from the Sale of Tax
improvement area statute Property
FF-27 Tax Properties Issue: State statutes governing the
and Local Special Assessments apportionment of the proceeds from the sale
of tax forfeit property allow counties to first
Issue: Special assessments are a charge, recover administrative costs related to the
authorized by the Legislature and state law, tax forfeiture process before subsequent
imposed on properties for a particular allocations are made for special assessments
improvement that benefits those selected and hazardous waste cleanup associated
properties. Cities follow complex, time- with the property. Although the tax
consuming statutory special assessment forfeiture process is controlled by the
procedures to specially assess the county, the city often has more at stake
appropriate amount of the local financially in terms of costs fronted to
infrastructure improvements to those facilitate development (e.g., assessments for
properties. public infrastructure and unpaid
development or utility fees).
If a property with validly attached special
assessments goes into t�-forfeiture, the State law is unclear whether the proceeds
from a tax forfeiture transaction should be
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 99
used to reimburse the county only for the fees to be repaid immediately after
expenses associated with the transacted unpaid special assessments.
parcel, or if the proceeds can be used to
reimburse the county for administrative Minn. Stat. § 282.09 should be amended
costs associated with other parcels that were to assure that county administrative costs
not transacted. When the latter allocation are fairly allocated to transacted parcels
method is employed by a county, the and that cities are fairly reimbursed for
transaction proceeds can be unpaid development costs. The League
disproportionately applied to county also supports the elimination of the
administrative costs resulting in a lower apportionments for county forest
allocation of remaining proceeds to cover development and county parks/recreation
existing special assessments, hazardous areas while allowing counties to use their
waste cleanup costs and ultimately the final 40 percent share of the remaining
allocation of residual tax forfeit sale proceeds for these uses.
proceeds to cities.
FF-29. State Hazard Mitigation and
While the tax forfeit procedure provides a Response Support
process for the repayment of special
assessments, it does not require the Issue: Cities in Minnesota are exposed to
repayment of unpaid utility charges or extreme weather events such as winds,
unpaid building and development fees. flooding, fires, and drought and are facing
the severe financial consequences of the
In addition, counties are allowed to use 30 clean-up, repairs, and community social and
percent of the amount remaining after the economic recovery, even though damages
deduction for administrative expenses and may be deemed "not of such severity and
the repayment of special assessments for magnitude" as to qualify for federal
forest development projects and then 20 assistance.
percent of any remaining proceeds for
county parks and recreation projects. The Response: The League of Minnesota
structure of the distribution of the proceeds Cities calls on our legislators and state
frequently results in cities receiving a very executive agencies charged with hazard
small percentage of the initial forfeit sale mitigation planning to address not only a
proceeds. As a result cities may not recoup response to extreme weather events but to
even a portion of the unpaid taxes owed on a also put into place a pro-active strategy to
property. minimize or mitigate the financial
consequences. At a minimum, this effort
Response: The League of Minnesota should offer a reasonable loan funding
Cities supports changes in the program that is easily accessible by cities,
distribution of the proceeds from the sale businesses and homeowners to financially
of tax forfeit property contained in Minn. recover and rebuild, with the ultimate
Stat. § 282.08 to elevate the priority for goal of preserving jobs, industries, and
repayment of unpaid charges for communities.
electricity, water and sewer charges
certified pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 44.075 The state response should allow for the
subd. 3(e) and any unpaid fees prescribed use of new technology and best
pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 462.353 subd. management practices for any
4(a) to require those unpaid charges and reconstruction of infrastructure to lessen
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 100
the impact of future disasters and to city and rural tax burdens for library
mitigate the effects of disasters resulting services. Furthermore, library services have
from future extreme weather events. expanded over the years with the offering of
electronic content material, multimedia
FF -30. Impact Fees resources, and Internet access in many
locations, putting more demand on stretched
Issue: New development and the resulting library budgets.
growth create an increased demand for
public infrastructure and other public Response: The League of Minnesota
facilities. Severe constraints on local fiscal Cities supports equity in availability of
resources and dramatic forecasts for quality library services to city and
population growth have prompted cities to township residents as long as there is
reconsider ways to pay for the inevitable equity in local property tax levies for
costs associated with new development. libraries among participating
jurisdictions. To that end, policymakers
Traditional financing methods tend to should explore the idea of regional public
subsidize new development at the expense library districts on a statewide basis,
of the existing community, discourage sound similar to the authority currently in
land-use planning, place inefficient Minn. Stat. § 134.201 for certain regional
pressures on public facilities, and allow systems.
under-utilization of existing infrastructure.
Consequently, local communities are If cities where a library is located are
exploring methods to ensure new responsible for maintenance, upkeep, and
development pays its fair share of the true capital improvements to the library, those
costs of growth. Given the existing costs must be considered part of the total
authorization to impose fees on new equity requirement, not in addition to it.
development for water, sanitary and storm In order to continue to provide the
sewer, and park purposes, it is reasonable to expanded services, cities should be
extend the concept to additional public relieved of state-mandated maintenance-
infrastructure and facilities improvement of-effort funding levels and given the
also necessitated by new development. authority to charge user fees for other
services without jeopardizing the state aid
Response: The Legislature should they do receive. Cities that provide
authorize local units of government to library facilities where library operations
impose impact fees so new development are associated with a regional library
pays its fair share of the off-site, as well as system should be contractually
the on-site, costs of public infrastructure guaranteed a direct voice in the
and other public facilities needed to governance and funding decisions within
adequately serve new development. the library system.
FF-31. Equity in Library Funding FF-32. Equitable Funding of
Commu�ity Education Services
Issue: Many community libraries in
Minnesota are city owned. Although located Issue: Under Minn. Stat. § 124D.20, school
in an individual community, city libraries districts are authorized to levy for
serve a much wider area. In some Minnesota community education programs that can
counties, there are wide disparities between include youth recreational activities.
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 101
However, state statute limits the total
amount of revenue that can be raised by the
school district to fund community education
programs and this limit has not been
sufficiently increased in recent years. In
many instances, cities participate in the
funding of these programs and with the
statutory limit on the amount school districts
can levy, the increased cost of these
programs is increasingly falling on cities and
their property taxpayers. In areas where the
school district is significantly larger than the
city, the burden of funding these programs is
falling disproportionately on city taxpayers
while the programs benefit the entire school
district.
Response: The League of Minnesota
Cities supports a statutory increase in the
community education revenue
authorization for school districts.
Increasing the amount of the community
service revenue available to school
districts would provide a steady source of
revenue, which would be assessed against
all properties in the school district, not
just against properties in the city.
League of Minnesota Cities
2013 City Policies Page 102
� n
t °- / �J
j�EAGUE oF
j�/li N N E SOTA
CITIES
League of Minnesota Cities
145 University Avenue West
St. Paul, MN 55103-2044
rEL: (651) 281.-1200
(800) 925-1122
TDD: (C51) 281-1290
FAX: (651} 281-1299
WEB: w�vwlmc.org
�
1 '. �
`
� Associatian af Metropvfitan M�anicipalities
L� i�la�iv� Polic���
1
�
Janu�ry 2013 �
} .
�:..,
r _.
� :
G, ,
t: _
f .
�
i
Metro Ci�ies �
Association of Metropoiitan Municipalities
145 University Avenue West � -
St. Paul, MN SS1Q3-2044
Phone: 651-215-4000 Website: www.MetroCitiesMN.org Fax: 651-281-1299 Twitter: @MetroCitiesMN �
Staff inembers: .
Patricia Nauman Todd Olson Charlie Vander Aarde Laurie Jennings
Executive Director Gov't Relations Specialist Gov't Relations Specialist Of�ce Manager
651-215-4002 651-215-4003 651-215-4001 651-215-4004
Patricia@MetroCitiesMN.org Todd@MetroCitiesMN.org Charlie@MetroCitiesMN.org Laurie@MetroCitiesMN.org
Table of Contents
Municipal Revenue & Taxation (1)
State and Local Fiscal Relationship (1-A) 1
Revenue Diversification (1-B) 2
Levy Limits (1-C) 2
Restrictions on Local Government Budgets (1-D) 2
Budget and Financial Reporting Requirernents (1-E) 2
Local Governrnent Aid (LGA) (1-F) 3
Local Government Aid Reform (1-G) 3
State Property Tax Relief Programs (1-H) 4
Property Valuation Limits/Limited Market Value (1-I) 4
Homestead Market Value Exclusion Program (1-J) 4
Fiscal Disparity Fund Distribution (1-K) 5
Constitutional Tax and Expenditure Limits (1-L} 6
State Property Tax (1-M) 6
Class Rate Tax System (1-N) 6
Regional Facility Host Communities (1-O) 6
Sales Tax on Local Government Purchases (1-P) 7
City Revenue Stability and Fund Salance (1-Q) 7
Public Employees' Retirement Association (PERA) (1-R) 7
State Program Re�enue Sources (1-S) 8
2013 Legislative Policies i
Table of Contents
Post Employment Benefits (1-T) 8
Health Care Insurance Programs (1-U) 8
State Budget Stability (1-V) 8 ,__.
Online Travel Companies and Taxes (1-W) 9
Taxation of Electronic Commerce (1-X) 9
:. ..
General Legislation (2)
Mandates, Zoning & Local Authority (2-A) 11 i'.
City Enterprise Activities (2-B) 11
r_,
Firearms on City Property (2-C) 11 `' '
911 Telephone Tax (2-D) 12
800 MHz Radio System (2-E) 12 '
Building Codes (2-F) 12
Administrative Fines (2-G) 13
Residential Care Facilities (2-H) 13 � '
Annexation (2-I) 14
Housing Ordinance Enforcement (2-J) 14
Statewide Funding Sources for Local Issues with Regional '.
Impact (2-K) 15
Dangerous Substance Regulation (2-L) 15 '
Private Well Drilling Restriction Authority (2-M) 15
Organized Waste Collection (2-N) 15
Voter ID Implementation Costs (2-O) 16
2013 Legislative Policies ii
Table of Contents
Housing & Economic Development (3)
Introduction 17
City Role in Housing (3-A) 17
City Role in Affordable and Life Cycle Housing (3-B) 17
Inclusionary Housing (3-C) 18
Metropolitan Council Role in Housing (3-D) 18
Allocation of Affordable Housing Needs (3-E) 19
State Role in Affordable Housing (3-F) 20
Federal Role in Affordable and Workforce Housing (3-G) 21
Vacant, Boarded, and Foreclosed Properties and
Properties at Risk (3-H} 22
Economic Development and Redevelopment (3-I) 23
Economic Development (3-I) (1) 23
Redevelopment (3-I) (2) 24
Tax Increment Financing (3-J) 25
Eminent Domain (3-K) 27
This Old House/This Old Shop (3-L) 28
Eusiness Incentives Policy (3-1VI) 28
Internet Technology (3-N) 28
City Role in Environmental Protection and Sustainable
Development (3-O) 29
Impaired Waters (3-P) 29
2013 Legislative Policies iii
__
Table of Contents
Metropolitan Agencies (4) '
Goals and Principles for Regional Governance (4-A) 31
Regional Governance Structure (4-B) 32
Comprehensive Analysis of Metropolitan Council (4-C) 32
Oversight of Metropolitan Council (4-D) 32
Funding Regional Services (4-E) 33 ; '
�
Regional Systems (4-F) 33
Review of Local Comprehensive Plans (4-G) 34
Comprehensive Planning Process (4-H) 34 ;
,
Comprehensive Planning Schedule (4-I) 35 -
E__ 1
Local Zoning Authority (4-J) 35
Regional Growth (4-K) 35
Natural Resource Protection (4-L) 37
Inflow and Infiltration (I/ I) (4-M) 37
?
Water Supply (4-N) 38
Service Availability Charge (SAC) (4-O) 39
Funding Regional Parks & Open Space (4-P) 40
Livable Communities (4-Q) 40 ,
�
Density (4-R) 41
Transportation (5)
�
Transportation Funding (5-A) 43
2013 Legislative Policies ' • iv
Table of Contents
Regional Transit System (5-B) 43
Transit Financing (5-C) 44
Street Improvement Districts (5-D) 45
Highway Turnbacks & Funding (5-E) 45
"3C" Transportation Planning Process: Elected Officials'
Role (5-F) 45
Photo Enfarcement of Traffic Laws (5-G) 46
' Airport Noise Mitigation (5-H) 46
_, Cities Under 5,000 Population (5-I) � 46
County State Aid Highway (CSAH) Distribution
Formula (5-J) 47
Municipal Input/Consent for Trunk Highways and
County Roads (5-K) 47
Plat Authority (5-L) 48
City Speed Limit Control (5-M) 48
MnDOT Maintenance Budget (5-N) 48
Transit Taxing District (5-O) 48
Complete Streets (5-P) 49
Committee Rosters (6)
2012 Housing & Economic Development Committee 51
2012 Metropolitan Agencies Committee 52
2012 Municipal Revenue & Taxation Committee 52
2012 Transportation & General Government Committee 53
2013 Legislative Policies v
Table of Contents
, _,
r -,
4 '
i
�
i.
4 .
i
2013 Legislative Policies vi
o Municipal Revenue &
ao .
- Taxat�on(I)
1-A State and Local Fiscal Relationship
Metro Cities supports a strong state and local fiscal relationship that emphasizes
adequacy, equitability and accountability for public resources, and effective
communication between the state, its cities, and the public about the roles and
responsibilities of state and local governments. Metro Cities believes that the state and
local relationship is in decline, as expressed through significant reductions in and
increasingly unpredictable levels of state aids and credits. The diminishment of the state
and local partnership has forced the funding of city services to be disproportionately
reliant on the property tax and has placed an undue burden on city cash flows.
Increasingly, cities are also bearing more of the responsibility for the costs for services
that have historically been the responsibility of the state.
Metro Cities supports a state and local fiscal relationship that affirms the goal of all
citizens receiving adequate levels of basic public services at relatively similar levels
of taxation, that compensates cities for service costs created by non-taxpaying users
of city services, that reduces tax burden disparities among communities, and that
assists cities with high needs and relatively low fiscal capacities.
-- Metro Cities supports a strong state and local fiscal partnership that emphasizes the
following principles:
• Strong financial stewardship and accountability for public resources that emphasizes
maximizing efficiencies in service delivery and effective communication between the
state and local units of government, and to the public, about state and local roles and
responsibilities;
• Certainty and predictability in revenue sources including the property tax and local
government aids, and the use of dedicated funds that meet specific local government
needs. Metro Cities opposes the diversion of such dedicated funds to help balance
state budgets;
• Adequate revenue sources available to cities that allow the needs of cities to be met,
mandates to be funded, and that maintain our state's economic vitality and
competitiveness;
• Metro Cities supports the concept of performance measuring, but opposes using state
established local performance measurements to determine the allocation of state aids
to local gavernments, or to deny local governments the authority to establish their
own budgets and levies, as such measurements do not well account for varying local
needs and circumstances.
2013 Legislative Policies 1
Municipal Revenue 8� Taxation
1-B Revenue Diversification
Metro Cities supports a balanced and diversified revenue system that acknowledges '
the diversity in city characteristics, needs and revenue capacities, and allows for
greater stability in revenues. The diminishment in state aids is creating severe
challenges for many cities in the provision of public services and increased reliance on ;
the property tax.
Metro Cities supports greater access to other tax and revenue sources, and statutory !
modifications that allow cities to impose a local option sales tax for public
improvements, without the need for special legislation.
i
Metro Cities supports having local sales tax referendums conducted at a general or
special election. The Legislature should recognize the equity considerations involved
with local sales taxes, and continue to provide aids to cities that have higk needs, !
overburdens andlor low fiscal capacity. '�
�_,
1-C Levy Limits ' '
�_
Metro Cities strongly opposes levy limits. Levy limits undermine local budgeting
processes, planned growth, and the relationship between locally elected officials and
their residents by allowing the state to decide the appropriate level of local taxation
and services, despite varying local conditions and circumstances. �
1 Restrictions on Local Government Budgets �
Metro Cities opposes the imposition of artificial mechanisms such as valuation ' -
freezes, payroll freezes, reverse referenda, super majority requirements for levy, or '
other limitations to the local government budget and taxing process.
,,
1-E Budget and Financial Reporting Requirements
State laws require cities to prepare and submit or publish numerous budget and financial
reports. These requirements often add significant costs to cities, and many requirements
often result in duplication. Any additional reporting requirements should be weighed to
balance the need for additional information with the costs to cities of compiling and '
submitting this information. In light of the numerous existing reporting requirements,
Metro Cities supports reducing the number of unnecessary mandated reporting ;
requirements.
2013 Legislative Policies 2
Municipal Revenue & Taxation
1-F Local Government Aid (LGA)
The LGA program, originally enacted in 1971, was created with the goals of providing
property tax relief, and ensuring a sufficient level of revenues for local government
needs. Metro Cities supports Local Government Aid (LGA), the only form of general
purpose state aid to Minnesota cities, as a means of ensuring that all cities are able to
provide basic public services without over-burdening the property taa�.
In response to the state's budget deficits, LGA has been continually reduced. These
reductions have fallen disproportionately on metropolitan area communities. Overall,
reductions to local government aids and credits have been greater on a percentage basis
than reductions made to other areas of the state budget. The level of reductions and un-
allotments and the unreliability of funding from year to year undermine the goals of the
LGA program.
Metro Cities strongly opposes the continued reductions of Local Government Aid
for the purpose of balancing state budget de�cits and opposes singling out specific �
communities for local aid reductions. Metro Cities also opposes freezes to LGA,
which increase volatility in the distribution of LGA.
Metro Cities supports the restoration of previous LGA cuts, adequate funding of the
LGA program and the continuation of LGA to those cities whose public service
needs and costs exceed their ability to pay.
1 Local Government Aid Reform
Metro Cities' supports an LGA program that allows cities across the state to
provide public services at relatively similar levels of taxation, and that serves the
needs of cities across the state more equitably. Metro Cities' policies recognize that
our state's prosperity and vitality depend significantly upon a healthy and vibrant
metropolitan region, and supports changes to LGA to better address the needs of
cities in the metropolitan area.
The current LGA program does not adequately address the needs of many metropolitan
communities. Changes to the LGA formula and diminished funding levels have altered
the distribution of LGA, creating geographic inequities in the LGA program. The needs
of many metropolitan communities, particularly older, fully developed suburbs, are
inadequately addressed under the current LGA structure. These communities often have a
mix of aging infrastructure, changing demographics, high service needs, below average
tax capacities, restricted use of redevelopment tools, and reduced federal and state
assistance to aid revitalization. A functional LGA program is one that helps to assure all
2013 Legislative Policies 3
Municipal Revenue & Taxation
cities can provide and fund local public services and infrastructure, in order to position '
our state and metropolitan region for strong economic growth and vibrancy.
Metro Cities supports the efforts of the LGA study groups to analyze and
recommend reforms to the program. Metro Cities further supports having the
groups consider the LGA program in the context of the overall state and local fiscal ''
,
relationship.
1-H State Property Tax Relief Programs �
Metro Cities supports state funded property tax relief programs that are paid
directly to homestead property taxpayers such as the circuit breaker and enhanced
targeting for special circumstances. Metro Cities supports an analysis of the State's ,__
property tax relief programs to determine their effectiveness and equity in '
providing property tax relief to individuals and families across the state. ""`
Metro Cities supports the use of the Department of Revenue's "Voss" database to `'
link income and property values, and the consideration of income relative to �'
property taxes paid in determining eligibility for state property tax relief programs.
1-I Property Valuation Limits/Limited Market Value ,
�
Metro Cities strongly opposes the use of artificial limits in valuing property at
market for taxation purposes, since such limitations shift tax burdens to other
classes of property and create disparities between properties of equal value. �
1-J Homestead Market Value Exclusion Program
In 2011, new state laws established a Market Value Homestead Exclusion Program, and ,
repealed the Maxket Value Homestead Credit. The intent of both programs was to provide '
property tax relief to qualifying homesteads, the former MVHC through credits on local
government tax bills and the new MVHE through reductions in property tax values.
Under the former MVHC, the state reimbursed local governments in exchange for
reducing the taxable value of qualifying properties. The new program pays for the
property tax relief by shifting property t�es within jurisdictions.
Metro Cities opposed the former market value homestead credit structure, because the
state failed to reimburse most local units of government for costs of the program, which
resulted in unpredictable holes in those local government budgets or required those :
jurisdictions to shift the cost of the program across its property taxpayers. Similarly,
because the credit structure is no longer in place and the state is no longer paying any
portion of its property tax relief program, implementation of the new MVHE program in
2013 Legislative Policies 4
Municipal Revenue 8� Taxation
2012 forcibly shifted the property tax burden within local jurisdictions in the state and
increased property taxes to pay for its costs.
Metro Cities supports statutory changes to address issues that have been identified
in �he implementation of the program around levy limits based on market value,
including those impacting economic development authorities and port authorities, as well
as debt limits based on market value. These limits should be computed on the market
value of the jurisdiction before the homestead market value exclusion is applied.
Metro Cities opposes restoration of the former Market Value Homestead Credit,
and encourages elimination of the new exclusion, as the program shifts taxes onto
other property classes and further complicates the property tax system.
' 1-K Fiscal Disparity Fund Distribution
Metro Cities supports the Fiscal Disparities Program. Metro Cities opposes any
diversion from the fiscal disparities pool to fund specific programs or projects, as
this would contradict the purposes of the program.
The Twin Cities Area Fiscal Dispaxities Program, enacted in 1971, was created for the
purposes of:
• providing a way for local governments to share in the resources generated by the
growth of the metropolitan area without removing existing resources;
� to prornote orderly development of the region by reducing the impact of fiscal
considerations on the location of business and infrastructure;
• to establish incentives for all parts of the area to work for the growth of the area as a
whole;
• to help communities at various stages of deyelopment;
• to encourage protection of the environment by reducing the impact of fiscal
considerations to ensure protection of parks, open space, and wetlands.
The 2011 legislative study of Fiscal Disparities, which Metro Cities participated in and
supported, has stimulated discussion of the program at the Legislature, and Metro Cities
anticipates modifications to the program to be proposed in the 2013 legislative session.
Legislation that would modify or impact the fiscal disparities program should only be
considered within a framework of comprehensive reform efforts to the state's property
tax, aids and credits system. Any proposed legislation that would modify or impact the
fiscal disparities program must be evaluated utilizing the criteria of fairness, equity,
stability, transparency and coherence in the treatment of cities and taxpayers across the
metropolitan region, and must continue to serve the program's intended purposes.
Further studies or task forces to consider modifications to the fiscal disparities program
must include participation and input from metropolitan local government representatives.
2013 Legislative Policies 5
Municipal Revenue 8� Taxation
1-L Constitutional Tax and Expenditure Limits
Metro Cities strongly opposes including tax and expenditure limits in the state ''
constitution. This would eliminate any flexibility on the part of the Legislature or '
local governments to respond to unanticipated critical needs, emergencies, or
fluctuating economic situations. When services such as education, public safety and ';
health care require increased funding beyond the overall limit, experiences in at least one
other state indicate that other publicly funded services receive less than adequate
resources. Constitutional limits result in a reduced base during times of economic i
downturn and the inability to recover to previous service levels when economic
prosperity returns.
1-M State Property Tax
The 2001 Property Tax Reform Act shifted general education funding to the state, and
� funded it, in part, with a new state property tax on commercial/industrial and cabin
property. The statute governing the state levy was subsequently amended so that the levy
is no longer dedicated to education and the levy is automatically adjusted by the rate of
inflation as measured by the implicit price deflator. _.
;
Since cities' only source of general funds is the property tax, Metro Cities strongly ''
opposes extension of a state-levied property tax to additional classes of property. __
Metro Cities supports efforts to have the state provide information on the property
tax statement regarding the state property tax.
i
1-N Class Rate Tax System
Metro Cities opposes elimination of the class rate tax system, or applying future levy `
increases to market value, since this would further complicate the property tax
system.
I-O Regional Facility Host Communities
Municipalities hosting regional facilities (such as utilities, landfills or aggregate mining)
incur costs and community impacts such as environmental damage or lost economic
development opportunities. Communities should be compensated for the impacts of these
facilities, which provide benefits to the region and state. Metro Cities supports ,
legislative efforts to offset the negative impacts of these facilities and activities on
host communities. Metro Cities would prefer that cities and townships be allowed to
collect a host fee that may be adjusted when state decisions impact those fees. -
2013 Legislative Policies 6
Municipal Revenue 8� Taxation
1-P Sales Tax on Local Government Purchases
State law currently requires local governments, with the exception of public schools,
nursing homes, towns, hospitals and public libraxies; to pay sales tax. The law exempts
certain local government units from some specific purchases such as ambulance vehicles
and equipment, road and bridge maintenance, emergency rescue vehicles, and others.
Metro Cities supports a reinstatement of the sales tax exemption for all local
government purchases, made by all local governments, since such charges represent
a double tax upon our citizens.
1 City Revenue Stability and Fund Balance
Metro Cities opposes state attempts to control or restrict city fund balances. These
funds are necessary to maintain fiscal viability, meet unexpected or emergency
resource needs, purchase capital goods and infrastructure, provide adequate cash
flow and maintain high level bond ratings. •
1 Public Employees' Retirement Association (PERA)
Metro Cities supports employees and cities sharing equally in the cost of necessary
contribution increases, the standard for the PERA General Plan, and a 60%
- employer/40% employee split, the standard for the PERA Police and Fire Plan.
Metro Cities also supports state assistance to local governments to cover any
additional contribution burdens placed o� cities over and above contribution
increases required by employees. Cities should receive sufficient notice of these
increases so that they may take them into account for budgeting purposes.
To help ensure the fiscal health of the PERA system, Metro Cities supported legislative
changes made in 2010 that will begin to address funding deficiencies in the PERA
General Plan and PERA Police and Fire Plans. We oppose benefit improvements for
active employees or retirees until the financial health of the PERA General Plan and
PERA Police and Fire Plan are restored.
Metro Cities supports modifications to help align PERA contributions and costs,
and reduce the need for additional contribution increases, including a modification
of PERA eligibility guidelines to account for temporary, seasonal and part time
employment situations, the use of pro-rated service credit, and a comprehensive
review of exclusions to simptify eligibility guidelines. Further employer contribution
rate increases should be avoided until other cost alignment mechanisms are
considered.
Metro Cities will monitor legislative proposals and plan design changes and, when
necessary and appropriate, respond in a manner that supports this policy and provides for
the fair treatment of employees and the protection of municipalities' interests.
2013 Legislative Policies �
Municipal Revenue & Taxation
1-S State Program Revenue Sources ,!
Metro Cities opposes any attempt by the state to finance programs of statewide �I '
value and signi�cance with local revenue sources such as municipal utilities or
property tax mechanisms. These local revenue sources are created to finance local
government services. Statewide programs, such as the Clean Water Legacy Act, serve
important state goals and objectives, and should be financed through traditional state
revenue sources such as the income or sales ta�c.
i
1-T Post Employment Benefits
Metro Cities supported 2008 statutory changes that allow local governments to
establish trusts from which to fund post-employment health and life insurance
benefits for public employees, with participation by cities on a strictly voluntary `'
basis, in recognition that cities have differing local needs and circumstances. Cities �'
should also retain the ability to determine the level of post employment benefits to be
provided to employees.
1-U Health Care Insurance Programs r'
'
Metro Cities supports legislative efforts to control health insurance costs, but opposes
,
actions that undermine local flexibility to manage rising insurance costs. Metro Cities
encourages a full examination of the rising costs of health care and the impacts on city
employers and employees. Metro Cities also supports a study of the fiscal impacts to both
cities and retirees of pooling retirees separately from active employees.
1-V State Budget Stability
In recent years, the State has experienced increasingly substantial budget deficits and
volatility in state revenues. To address state budget shortfalls, the Legislature and
Governor have focused their efforts on reducing expenditures, shifting costs to other units '
of government, delaying school payments, and drawing down the state budget reserve.
Many of these options will not be available to address future state budget shortfalls and
the Legislature and Governor must seek solutions that achieve structural budget balance. `'
In 2013, the state budget deficit is projected to be $1 billion.
Metro Cities strongly supports changes to the state's revenue system that enhance
and improve stability, flexibility and adequacy in the system. Such changes should
focus on reducing the volatility of state revenues and improving the long term
balance of state revenues and expenditures. Metro Cities supports a statutory
budget reserve minimum that is adequate to manage risks and fluctuations in the
state's tax system and a cash flow reserve account of sufficient size so that the state '
can avoid short term borrowing to manage cash flow fluctuations.
2013 Legislative Policies 8
Municipal Revenue 8� Taxation
Metro Cities also supports an examination of the property tax system and the
relationships between state and local tax bases, with an emphasis on recent state
budget cuts and their impact on property taxes. State budget deficits must be balanced
with statewide sources and must not further reduce funding for property t� relief
programs and aids to local governments that result in local governments bearing more
responsibility for the costs of services that belong to the state.
1-W Online Travel Companies and Taxes
Metro Cities oppbses legislation that allows online travel companies a t� exemption that
terminates obligations to pay hotel taxes to state and local governments, ar otherwise
restricts legal actions by states and localities.
1-X Taxation of Electronic Commerce
Metro Cities supports efforts to develop streamlined sales and use tax system to simplify
sales and use ta�� collection and administration by retailers and states. Metro Cities
supports policies that encourage remote retailers to collect and remit state sales taxes in
states that are complying with the Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Agreement.
2013 Legislative Policies 9
Municipal Revenue 8� Taxation
�. ,
�
�- �.
.,
i
1
I i
t.
f
�
I
2013 Legisiative Policies 10
�° n r ' i n 2
� G e e a l l e g i s l a t oO
,
2-A Mandates, Zoning & Local Authority
Metro Cities opposes statutory changes which erode local control and authority or
create mandated additional tasks requiring new or added local costs without a
corresponding state appropriation or funding mechanism. Metro Cities believes that
zoning decisions should be made at the local level. Metro Cities supports legislation
that gives local officials greater authority and discretion to approve variances in
order to remain flexible in response to the unique land use needs of their own
community.
New unfunded mandates potentially cause increased property taxes which impede cities'
ability to fund traditional service needs. To allow for greater collaboration and flexibility
in providing local services, Metro Cities also encourages the removal of barriers or
hurdles to cooperation and coordination between cities and other units of government or
entities. Metro Cities supports local decision-making authority. �
2-B City Enterprise Activities
Creation of an enterprise operation allows a city to provide the desired service while
maintaining financial and management control. The state should refrain from infringing
on this ability to provide and control services for the benefit of community residents.
Metro Cities supports cities having authority to establish city enterprise operations
in response to community needs, local preferences, state mandates or to ensure
residents' quality of Iife.
2-C Firearms on City Property
Cities should be allowed to prohibit handguns and other weapons in city-owned
buildings, facilities and parks. This would allow locally elected officials to determine
whether to allow permit-holders to bring guns into municipal buildings, liquor stores, city
council chambers and city sponsored youth activities. It is not Metro Cities' intention for
cities to have the authority to prohibit legal weapons in parking lots, on city streets, city
sidewalks or on locally approved hunting land.
Metro Cities supports local control to allow or prohibit handguns and other
weapons on city owned property.
2012 Legislative Policies 11
General Legislation
2-D 911 Telephone Tax
Public safety answering points (PSAPs) must be able to continue to rely on state 911 i" ''
revenues to pay for upgrades and modifications to loca1911 systems, maintenance and
operational support, and dispatcher training.
,__
Metro Cities supports state funding for the technology and training needed to
provide the number and location of wireless and voice over internet protocol (VoIP)
calls to 911 on computer screens and transmit that data to police, fire and first '!
responders. ,
2-E 800 MHz Radio System
Metro Cities urges the Legislature to provide cities with the financial means to obtain ;, '
required infrastructure and subscriber equipment (portable and mobile radios) as well as
. provide funding for operating costs, since the prime purpose of this system is to allow
public safety agencies and other units of government the ability to communicate ;
effectively. ' '
Metro Cities supports the work of the Metropolitan Emergency Services Board �
(previously the Metropolitan Radio Board) in implementing and maintaining the
800 MHz radio system, as long as cities are not forced to modify their current ,_ ,
systems or become a part of the 800 MHz Radio System unless they so choose. '�
2-F Building Codes ;
In spite of the serious downturn in the construction economy, thousands of new housing
units have been constructed annually in the metro area, and when the economy rebounds,
building will resume. Structural and water intrusion problems have surfaced in many •
houses and commercial buildings built in the last 20 years. These problems have resulted
in dissatisfied homeowners and conflicts between the state, builders and cities.
Metro Cities supports an equitable distribution of fees from the Construction Code
Fund, with proportional distribution based on the area of enforcement where the '
fees were received. Metro Cities further supports a joint effort by the state, cities �
and builders to cotlectively identify appropriate uses for the fund, including
education, analysis of new materials and construction techniques, building code
updating, building inspector training, development of performance standards and
identification of construction "best practices."
,
Metro Cities supports including the International Green Construction Code as an
`optional appendix' to the State Building Code to allow cities to utilize a ro riate
PP P
parts of those guidelines in their communities. Metro Cities also supports adopting
the international energy conservation code to the state building code without `'
2013 Legislative Policies � 2
General Legislation
amendments. Metro Cities does not support legislative solutions that fail to
recognize the interrelationships between builders, state building codes and cities.
Metro Cities supports efforts to increase awareness of the potential impacts and
benefits of requiring sprinklers in new homes and townhouses, and supports
` discussion and the dissemination of information around these impacts via the code
adoption process through the Department of Labor and Industry.
2-G Administrative Fines
Traditional methods of citation, enforcement and prosecution have met with increasing
costs to local units of government. The use of administrative fines is a tool to moderate
those costs. Metro Cities supported expansion of the 2009 administrative fine authority to
allow cities to issue administrative fines for defined local traffic offenses. While the
expanded authority is a welcome enhancement, further compromise language is
necessary to enhance the workability of the author�ty. Metro Cities continues to support
all cities' authority to use administrative fines for regulatory ordinances, such as building
codes, zoning codes, health codes, and public safety and nuisance ordinances.
Metro Cities supports the use of city administrative fines, at a minimum, for
regulatory matters that are not duplicative of misdemeanor or higher level state
traffic and criminal offenses. Metro Cities also endorses a fair hearing process
before a disinterested third party.
2-H Residential Care Facilities
Sufficient funding and oversight is needed to ensure that residents living in residential
care facilities have appropriate care and supervision, and that neighborhoods are not
disproportionately impacted by high concentrations of residential care facilities. Under
current law, operators of certain residential care facilities are not required to notify cities
when they intend to purchase single-family housing for this purpose. Cities do not have
the authority to regulate the locations of group homes and residential care facilities. Cities
have reasonable concerns about high concentrations of these facilities in residential
neighborhoods, and additional traffic and service deliveries surrounding these facilities
when they are grouped closely together. Municipalities recognize and support the
- services residential care facilities provide. However, cities also have an interest in
preserving balance between group homes and other uses in residential neighborhoods.
Providers applying to operate residential care facilities should be required to notify the
city when applying for licensure so as to be informed of local ordinance requirements as
a part of the application process.
Licensing agencies should be required to notify the city of properties receiving licensure
to be operated as residential care facilities.
2013 Legislative Policies 13
General Legislation
Metro Cities supports statutory authority to require licensed agencies and licensed
providers that operate residential care facilities to notify the city of properties being '�
operated as residential care facilities. Metro Cities also supports the establishment '
of non-concentration standards, similar to those allowed for the core cities, for
residential care facilities to prevent clustering and require the appropriate county I
agencies to enforce these rules.
2-I Annexation
A Municipal Boundary Adjustment Task Force, established in 2006, was charged with `
�
developing recommendations regarding best practices annexation training for city and
township officials to better communicate and jointly plan potential annexations. The
report from that task force was published in February of 2009. While the task force was ;"�'.
able to define the differences between cities and townships on the issue of annexation, no
significant advancements were made in creating best practices.
Metro Cities supports continued legislative efforts to develop recommendations r
regarding best practices annexation training for city and township officials to better
communicate and jointly plan potential annexations. Further, Metro Cities supports
substantive changes to the state's annexation laws that will lead to better land-use �
planning, energy conservation, greater environmental protection, fairer tax bases,
and fewer conflicts between townships and cities. Metro Cities also supports
technical annexation changes that have been agreed to by cities and townships. '
t
2 Housing Ordinance Enforcement
In 2008, the Minnesota State Supreme Court ruled in Morris v. Sax that certain ''
provisions of the city of Morris' rental housing code were invalid because there were t:
subjects dealt with under the state building code and the city was attempting to regulate
these areas "differently from the state building code:" Minnesota Statutes section 16B.6s
subdivision 1 states: �
"The state building code applies statewide and supersedes the building code of any
municipality. A municipality must not by ordinance or through development agreement '
require building code provisions regulating components or systems of any residential
structure that are different from any provision of the state building code."
Metro Cities supports the ability of cities to enforce all housing codes passed by a
local municipality to maintain its housing stock:
2013 Legislative Policies � 4
General Legislation
2-K Statewide Funding Sources for Local Issues with Regionai Impact
Many issues including, but not limited to, the implementation of a metropolitan area
groundwater monitoring network, emerald ash borer eradication and the cleanup of
storm-water retention ponds, come with significant local costs, and have impacts that
reach beyond municipal boundaries.
Metro Cities supports the availability of statewide funding sources to address local
issues that have regional or statewide significance. Metro Cities opposes the
requirement of enacting ordinances more restrictive than state law in exchange for
access to these funds.
2-L Dangerous Substance Regulation
In metropolitan regions where most cities share boundary lines with other cities, the
banning of dangerous substances at the local level does not eliminate access to these
products unless all cities take �the same regulatory action.
Under these circumstances, as evidenced by recent synthetic marijuana and analog
drug situations, Metro Cities supports statewide regulation and prohibition of
substances found to present a danger to anyone who uses them.
2-M Private Well Drilling Restriction'Authority
Cities are authorized to enact ordinances that disallow the placement of private wells
within city limits to ensure both water safety and availability for residents and businesses.
Municipal water systems are financially dependent upon users to operate and maintain
the system. A loss of significant rate payers as a result of unregulated private well drilling
_ would economically destabilize water systems and could lead to contamination of the
water supply.
Metro Cities supports current law authorizing cities to regulate and prohibit the
placement of private wells within municipal utility service boundaries and opposes
any attempt to remove or alter that authority.
2 Organized V1Easte Collection
Cities over 1,000 population are required by law to ensure all residents have solid waste
collection available to them. A city can meet the statutory requirement by licensing
haulers to operate in an open collection system, authorize city employees to collect waste,
or implement organized collection through one or multiple haulers to increase efficiency,
reduce truck traffic and control costs to residents.
2013 Legislative Policies 15
._
General Legislation
Current law requires cities to follow a cumbersome and costly investigative process
before enacting an organized collection ordinance. Further, requiring cities to adopt an
intent to organize prior to investigating the merits of organized collection elevates '
tensions around the subject before a city begins the process. i
Metro Cities supports easing statutory requirements to allow cities to investigate the '` '
merits of organized collection without the pressure of a rigid timeline and
requirement to pass `an intent to organize' at the beginning of the discussion
process. Metro Cities opposes any legislation that would further increase the cost or
further complicate the process cities are required to follow to organize its waste �
collection or prohibit cities from implementing or using organized waste collection.
t _
2-O Voter ID Implementation Costs
f _ ,
,
Cities play a critical role in managing and ensuring the integrity of elections. Any `
changes made to election laws to implement a voter ID requirement should not place •
undue financial or administrative burdens on local governments. Any additional costs ,{
brought on by election law changes should be the responsibility of the state. �
�_ ,
�
�
;
2013 Legislative Policies 16
,.�-��°�� Housin & Economic
.;; ;;.
g
; ; Develo rnent 3
�_______, p � )
Introduction
While the provision of housing is predominantly a private sector, market-driven activity,
all levels of government — federal, state and local — have a role to play in facilitating the
production and preservation of affordable housing in Minnesota.
Metro Cities' housing policies recognize and support the intergovernmental nature of this
issue — including participation from federal, state, regional and local governments. Cities
. are responsible for much of the ground-level housing policy in Minnesota — including
land-use planning, building code enforcement, and often times the packaging of financial
incentives. However, the State and Metropolitan Council must also play a major role by
: empowering local units of government and providing a variety of funding programs and
tools. ,
3-A City Role in Housing
In the state of Minnesota, the provision of housing is predominantly a private sector,
market-driven activity. However, all cities facilitate the development of housing via
. responsibilities in the areas of land-use planning, zoning ordinances and subdivision
regulations. Many cities take on a significant administrative burden by providing
financial incentives and regulatory relief, participating in state and regional housing
programs and supporting either local or countywide Housing and Redevelopment
Authorities. Cities are also responsible for ensuring the health and safety of local
residents and the structural soundness and livability of the local housing stock via
building permits and inspections.
Metro Cities strongly opposes any effort to reduce, alter or interfere with cities'
authoriTy to carry out these functions in a locally determined manner.
3-B City Role in Affordable and Life Cycle Housing
Metro Cities' supports both affordable housing and housing that is appropriate for
people at all stages of life. A variety of housing opportunities are important to the
economic and social well being of individual communities and the region. Cities can
facilitate the production and preservation of affordable and lifecycle housing by:
• Applying for funding from applicable grant and loan programs;
• Working with developers and local residents to blend affordable housing into new
and existing neighborhoods;
• Expediting review processes;
2012 Legislative Policies 17
Housing 8� Economic Development
• Working to reduce locally imposed development costs; and '-
• Using available regulatory mechanisms to shape housing communities.
3-C Inclusionary Housing
Metro Cities supports the location of affordable housing in residential and mia�ed-
use neighborhoods throughout a city. However, Metro Cities does not support passage
of a mandatory inclusionary housing law that would require a certain percentage of units ;
in all new housing developments to be affordable to households at a particular income
level because these units can't be produced without a deep developer subsidy or cross-
; _.,
subsidization from the other houses in the development. '
While Metro Cities believes there are cost savings to be achieved through regulatory
reform, density bonuses, and fee waivers, Metro Cities does not believe a mandatory '
inclusionary housing approach can achieve the desired levels of affordability solely '
through these steps. The Metropolitan Council, in creating its affordable �housing need ,.
number, must recognize both the opportunities and financial limitations of cities. The '
Council should partner with cities to facilitate the creation of affordable housing through `'
direct financial assistance andlor advocating for additional resources through the ,. ,
Minnesota Housing Finance Agency.
3-D Metropolitan Council Role in Housing �
The Metropolitan Council is statutorily required to assist cities with meeting the
provisions of the Land Use Planning Act, which requires cities to adopt sufficient 4
standards, plans and programs to meet their local share of the region's overall projected
need for low and moderate income housing. The Council's responsibilities include the -
preparation and adoption of guidelines and procedures to assist local government units
accomplish the requirements of the Land Use Planning Act.
Unlike parks, transit and wastewater, housing is not defined by statute as a regional
system, thus the Met Council's role, responsibilities and authority are more limited in
scope, centered on providing assistance to local governments by identifying the regional
need for affordable housing, projecting growth for the region, and identifying available
tools, resources and methods that cities can use to create and promote affordable housing
opportunities in their communities.
The Metropolitan Council also offers a variety of programs and initiatives to create
affordable housing opportunities, including the Livable Communities Program, and
operation of a metropolitan housing and redevelopment authority.
2013 Legislative Policies 18 ,
Housing 8� Economic Development
3-E Aliocation of Affordable Housing Need
In 2006, the Metropolitan Council created a methodology to determine how many
affordable housing units would be needed and where those units should go. From that
process, each metro area city was assigned an affordable housing need number. Further,
Met Council Comprehensive Plan guidance instructs cities to guide sufficient land to
accommodate their share of the region's affordable housing need.
Metro Cities supports the creation of a variety of housing opportunities. However, the
provision of affordable and lifecycle housing is a shared responsibility between the
private sector and government at all levels, including the federal government, state
government and Metropolitan Council. Land economics, construction costs and
infrastructure needs create barriers to the creation of affordable housing that cities cannot
overcome without assistance.
Therefore, Metro Cities supports a Metropolitan Council affordable housing policy
that recognizes the following tenets: .
• The Council's housing policies characterize individual city housing numbers as a
range of needs in the community.
• Cities need significant financial assistance from the federal and state
government, as well as the Metropolitan Council, in order to make progress
toward creating additional affordable housing;
• Metropolitan Council planning and policies around transit and affordable
housing must be more closely aligned to help ensure that transit resources are
available so that communities can meet affordable housing need allocations;
• Absent significant resources to assist cities, the Met Couricil will not hold cities
responsible if a city cannot meet its affordable housing need number and the
Met Council will reassess biennially the range of needs to recognize the
deficiency;
• The formula, and the methodology used to create the range of need and
allocations by community need to be re-evaluated at this time, and should be
routinely evaluated to determine if market conditions have changed or if
underlying conditions should prompt readjustment of the formula;
• The Council should use a methodology that incorporates data accumulated by
individual cities, and not limited to census driven growth projections;
• The formula should be adjusted to better reflect the balance and breadth of
existing affordable housing stocks; and �
2013 Legislative Policies 19
Housing 8� Economic Development
• The Council should engage in a"post" project analysis in order to measure the
effectiveness of that project.
3-F State Role in Affordable Housing
;
Primarily through the programs of the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA) and
the Department of Employee and Economic Development (DEED), the state establishes
general direction and prioritization of housing issues. The state financially supports a �
vaziety of housing types including homeless shelters, transitional housing, supportive
housing, senior housing, and family housing. The state must continue to be an active
partner in addressing lifecycle and affordable housing issues.
Metro Cities supports:
• Increased funding, including state general funds and, possibly, alternate sources
of revenue, for programs that support lifecycle, affordable housing, foreclosure
mitigation, senior, transitional and emergency housing. The state should
consider establishing a non-competitive program to create a pipeline to match `
city-subsidized affordable housing projects;
• Housing programs that assist housing development throughout the low-to- `
moderate income range;
,
• Housing programs designed to develop market rate housing in census blocks
with emerging or high concentrations of poverty, where the private market
might not otherwise invest as a means of reconciling affordable housing with
community development goals. `
• Continuing the policy of using the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency's
investment earnings for housing programs; `
• City input into state legislation involving distribution of tax credits and tax �_
exempt bonding;
• Exemptions from, or reductions to sales, use and transaction taxes applied to the
development and production of affordable housing;
• Consideration of providing state tax credits to leverage cross-subsidized
affordable units in a market rate development project. This incentive could be
used in conjunction with city, regional, or other state incentives; and
• Consideration of the use of state bond proceeds and other appropriations for
land banking, land trusts, and rehabilitation and construction of affordable
housing.
2013 Legislative Policies 20
Housing 8� Economic Development
• Homeownership counseling services, including pre-purchasing counseling, in
order to help reduce foreclosures by informing homeowners and potential
homeowners of their rights, options, and costs associated with owning a home.
• An affordable housing tax credit to help spur construction and secure additional
private investment.
• Eliminating the sunset date on municipal authority to establish a housing
improvement area (HIA).
3-G Federal Role in Affordable and Workforce Housing
Metro Cities encourages the federal government to maintain and increase current levels
of funding for affordable and workforce housing. Federal investment in affordable and
workforce housing will increase the supply of affordable and life cycle housing as well as
increase the inter jurisdictional collaboration between the two levels of government.
Federal funding plays a critical role in aiding states and local governments in their efforts
to maintain and increase affordable and workforce housing throughout the state.
Providing working families access to housing is an important piece to the economic
vitality of the region. Metro Cities strongly encourages the following:
• To preserve and increase funding for the Community Development Block Grant
Program and the federal HOME program, which are catalysts for creating more
affordable housing;
• To create and implement a more streamlined procedural method for local units
- of government to participate and access federal funding and services dealing
with grants, loans, and tax incentive programs for economic and community
development efforts;
• To preserve resources to sustain existing public housing throughout the Metro
Area;
• To commit resources to Section 8 funding. It is a flexible, cost effective, and
successful program that has helped nearly two million families nationally find
housing through promotion of self-sufficiency and stability; and
• To support federal funding to provide short-term assistance for HRAs in order
to facilitate the sale of tax-exempt bonds.
2013 Legislative Policies 21
Housing 8� Economic Development
3-H Vacant, Boarded, and Foreciosed Properties and Properties at Risk
There has been an epidemic of mortgage foreclosures in the state, and the number of ;
foreclosures continues to increase as more homeowners cannot afford to pay their
existing mortgages, and as many homeowners find themselves "underwater" in their
mortgages, with the result that some homeowners are choosing to walk away frorn their
homes rather than paying more than the home's value. As the economy continues to be
challenged, and recovery is expected to be slow, foreclosure levels are expected to
continue over the next couple of years.
While mortgage foreclosures are responsible for a significant portion of vacant and
boarded properties, they are not the only cause. Abandoned residential and commercial
properties ca.n be devastating to communities when the presence of vacant buildings `
results in reduced property values and increased crime. The additional public safety and
code enforcement costs of managing vacant properties are a financial strain on cities.
Metro Cities supports solutions to vacant and boarded properties that recognize �
three things: (1) Prevention is more cost effective than a cure. (2) The causes of this
problem are many and varied, thus the solutions must be as well. (3) It is not simply
a"city" problem so cities must not be expected to bear the bulk of the burden of ,--,
mitigation. '
Further, Metro Cities supports some specific proposals:
• Improvement of the redemption process to provide increased notification to
renters, strengthen the ability of homeowners to retain their properties, and �
reduce the amount of time a property is vacant;
• Expedition of the tax forfeiture process;
• Improve the cost assignment process fo ensure that cities can recoup their costs �
of managing vacant properties;
• Improve abi•lity of cities to recoup the increased public safety and enforcement
costs related to vacant properties;
�
• Increase financial tools for neighborhood recovery efforts, including tax
increment financing;
• Allowing cities to acquire vacant and boarded properties before deterioration
and vandalism result in unsalvageable structures; including providing financial
tools such as increasing eminent domain flexibility; ;
• Registration of vacant and boarded properties;
2013 Legislative Policies 22
Housing & Economic Development
• Year-round notification by utility companies of properties not receiving utility
service.
3-I Economic Development and Redevelopment
The economic viability af the Metro Area is' enhanced by a broad array of economic
development tools that create infrastructure, recycle previously developed property,
provide incentives for business development and support technological advances. It
_ should be the goal of the State to champion development by providing enough
sustainable funding to assure competitiveness in a global marketplace The State of
Minnesota should recognize cities as the primary unit of government responsible for the
implementation of economic development, redevelopment policies and land use controls.
State assistance to cities for development is required in two broad areas: (1) Economic
Development — direct business assistance; and (2) Redevelopment/Development — real
: estate development. They are not mutually exclusive — some projects require a boost on
both counts.
3-1 (1) Economic Development
_. For purposes of this section, economic development is defined as a form of development
that contains direct business assistance with the goal of sustainable job creation, job
retention or to nurture new or retain existing industry in the state. The measure of return
on investment of public business subsidies should iriclude the impact (positive or
negative) of "spin-off development" or business development that is ancillary and
supportive of the primary business.
Metro Cities supports:
• Continued competitive funding for the Minnesota Investment Fund;
• Continued funding for the Urban Initiative Program and other state programs
to support minority business start-ups;
• Continued support for the Bioscience partnerships between cities, companies
and University of Minnesota;
• Development of green opportunities for green job development and related
innovation and entrepreneurship;
• Economic tools that facilitate job growth without relying solely on the growth of
property tax base;
• The Regional Competitiveness Project, a collaboration of the Regional Council
of Mayors and the Business and Workforce investment Boards (DEED) with the
2013 Legislative Policies 23
Housing 8� Economic Development
goal of implementing a regional economic and workforce development
competitiveness strategy for short and long-term economic growth
• The Itasca Project, an employer led project to drive regional efforts to keep the
Twin Cities economy and quality of life competitive with other regions; and
• The Metro Business Plan initiative, a pilot project designed to highlight the
emergence of inetropolitan areas as a dominant source of economic and cultural
power in modern America.
�
t
• Greater MSP, a region-wide, private-public partnership whose mission is to
��m,
stimulate economic growth in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Region;
• Funding "QED's," the Qualified Economic Development Lender loan guarantee
program;
�
• Small business financing tools, such as a state new markets tax credit program,
mirrored on the federal program, which provides capital for business; and !
• Tools, such as tax incentives, to attract and retain data centers and other IT _.
facilities. !
3-I (2) Redevelopment '.
Redevelopment involves the development of land that requires "predevelopment." The ,
goal of redevelopment is to facilitate the development of "pre-used" land, thereby
leveling the playing field between green field and brown field sites so that a private
sector entity can rationally choose to locate on land that has already been used. The ,-
benefits of redevelopment include a decrease in Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMTs), more
efficient use of new or existing public infrastructure (including public transit),
ameliorated city costs due to public safety and code enforcement, and other public goods
that result when land is reused rather than abandoned and compact development is ',
encouraged.
Metro Cities supports:
• Increased funding and flexibility in the Metropolitan Council's Livable
Communities Programs. Metro Cities strongly opposes funding reductions,
transfers of Livable Communities Program funds to other program areas and
constraints on eligibility and program requirements. Metro Cities supports
allowing a maximum levy amount for this program, as provided for under
Minnesota Statutes;
,
• Increased, flexible and sustained funding for the Contamination Cleanup and '
Investigation Grant Program, administered by DEED;
2013 Legislative Policies 24
Housing 8� Economic Development
• New �nancing and regulatory tools to nurture Transit Oriented Development,
including funding for Transit Improvement Areas (TIAS) as defined in state
statute, as well as increased flexibility in the use of TIF for this purpose;
• Increased and sustained general fund and state bond funds for the
Redevelopment Grant Program, administered by DEED, dedicated to
Metropolitan Area projects.
• The evaluation of SAC fees to determine if they hinder redevelopment;
• Allowing for cities to "bank" SAC credits to use elsewhere within city;
• Expansion of existing tools or development of new funding mechanisms to
correct unstable soils; and
: • Extension of the sunset of the state income tax credit for preservation of historic
properties.
• Innovative Business Development Public Infrastructure grants.
3 Tax Increment Financing
Tax Increment Financing (TIF) has been and continues to be the primary tool available
for local communities to assist economic development, redevelopment and housing. Over
time, several statutory changes have made this critical tool increasingly difficult to use,
while recent property t� reform has resulted in a decreased state financial stake in city
TIF decisions. At the same time that TIF has become more restrictive and difficult to use,
federal and state development and redevelopment resources have been steadily shrinking.
The 2006 eminent domain changes will make redevelopment significantly more
expensive in some cases, and impossible in others. The cumulative impact of TIF
restrictions, shrinking federal and state redevelopment resources, and changes to eminent
domain laws will restrict a city's ability to address problem properties and will accelerate
the decline of developed cities in the Metropolitan Area. With huge state and federal
budget deficits, the only source of revenue available to accomplish the scope of
redevelopment necessary is the value created by the redevelopment itself, or the
"increment." Without the use of the increment development will either not occurs or is
unlikely to be optimal.
Metro Cities urges the Legislature to:
• Not adopt any statutory language that would further constrain or directly or
indirectly reduce the effectiveness of TIF;
2013 Legislative Policies 25
Housing 8� Economic Development
• Incorporate the Soils Correction District criteria into the Redevelopment
District criteria so that a Redevelopment District can be comprised of blighted
and contaminated parcels in addition to railroad property;
• Expand the flexibility of TIF to support a broader range of redevelopment
projects;
• Increase the ability to pool increments from other districts to support projects;
• Continue to monitor the impacts of tax reform on TIF districts and if warranted
provide cities with additional authority to pay for possible TIF shortfalls.
• Allow for the creation of transit zones and transit related TIF districts in order '
to shape development and related improvements around transit stations but not ,_,
require the use of TIF districts to fund the construction or maintenance of the
public transit line itself unless a local community chooses to do so. F'
• Allow TIF eligibility expansion to innovative technological products, recognizing 4
that not only physical items create economic value;
• Support changes to TIF law that will facilitate the development of "regional '
projects:" ` -
• Shift TIF redevelopment policy away from a focus on "blight" and
"substandard" to "functionally obsolete" or a focus on long range planning for a
particular community, reduction in green house gases or other criteria more ;
relevant to current needs. i
• Encourage DEED to do an extensive cost-bene�t analysis related to ;
redevelopment, including an analysis of the various funding mechanisms, and an
analysis of where the cost burden falls with each of the options compared the to
the distribution of the benefits of the redevelopment project.
• Support TIF for neighborhood recovery efforts in the wake of the foreclosure
crisis;
• Consider creating an inter-disciplinary TIF team to review local exception TIF
proposals, using established criteria, and make recommendations to the ,
legislature on their passage; and
• Metro Cities encourages the State Auditor to continue to work toward a more
efficient and streamlined reporting process.
• Clarifying use of TIF when a sale occurs after the closing of a district ;
2013 Legislative Policies 26
Housing & Economic Development
• Enacting statutory revisions to allow adjustments to original net tax capacity
calculations to reflect the new homestead market value exclusion. The new
homestead market value exclusion will have a negative impact on certain
housing TIF districts. The TIF statutes, Minn. Stat. § 469.177, provides for
adjustments in a district's original net tax capacity to reflect the conversion of a
taxable property to tax exempt status and also provides for adjustments to
reflect changes in property classifications enacted by the legislature. However,
the TIF statute does not address tax base changes as a result of the new
homestead market value exclusion. Consequently, the current value of a district
will be reduced by the exclusion but the original net tax capacity will not be
adjusted and increment available to the district will decline;
• Revise substandard building test to simplify, resolve ambiguities, and reduce
continued threat of litigation;
• Amend TIF statute to address, through extending districts or other mechanisms,
shortfalls related to declining market values during economic crises.
3-K Eminent Domain
Eminent domain law changes made by the 2006 Legislature resulted in a significant
philosophical and legal shift in Minnesota. Whereas prior to 2006, Minnesota law
provided extensive deference to local governments, statutory changes enacted in 2006
provide significantly greater deference to property owners. Eminent domain actions for
traditional public uses such as streets, parks or sewers will cost more. And except for the
most extreme cases of blight or contamination, eminent domain for redevelopment
purposes will be nearly impossible at any cost.
The proper operation and long term economic vitality of our cities is dependent on the
ability of a city, its citizens and its businesses to continually reinvest and reinvent.
Reinvestment and reinvention strategies can occasionally conflict with the priorities of
individual residents or business owners. Eminent domain is a critical tool in the
reinvestment and reinvention process and without it; our cities may deteriorate to
unprecedented levels before the public reacts. Metro Cities strongly encourages the
Governor and Legislature to revisit the 2006 eminent domain changes to allow local
governments to address redevelopment problems before those conditions become
financially impossible to address. Specifically, the Legislature should:
• Clarify contamination standards;
• Develop different standards for redevelopment to include obsolete structures or
to reflect the deterioration conditions that currentty exist in the Metro Area;
• Allow for the assembly of multiple parcels for redevelopment projects;
2013 Legislative Policies 27
Housing & Economic Development
� Provide for the ability to acquire land from "holdouts" who will now view a
publicly funded project as an opportunity for personal gain at taxpayer expense; ;�
i.e. allow for negotiation using balanced appraisals for fair relocation costs;
,. __.
• Modify the public purpose definition under Chapter 117 to allow cities to more ,.
expediently address properties that are vacant or abandoned in areas with high
levels of foreclosures, so as to address neighborhood stabilization and recovery.
• Allow for relocation costs not to be paid if the city and property owner agree to a
sale contract.
3-L This Old House/This Old Shop .
Metro Cities supports the reenactment of the "This Old House" law, which allowed '
owners of older homestead property to defer an increase in their tax capacity resulting �
from repairs or improvements to the home. In particular, "This Old House", or a similar j
program, should be reauthorized as an incentive for re-occupying and homesteading `
foreclosed or vacant homes. __
,
Metro Cities also supports passage of similar legislation for owners of older
commerciaVindustrial property that make improvements that increase the ;-
property's market value by at least 12%. �
,
3-M Business Incentives Policy
Without a thorough study, the Legislature should not make any substantive changes to the
Business Subsidy Act but should look to technical changes that would streamline both
state and local processes and procedures. The legislature should distinguish between �
development incentives and redevelopment activities. In addition, in order to ensure
cohesive and comprehensive regulations, the legislature should limit regulation of ';
business incentives to the Business Subsidy Act.
Metro Cities supports additional legislation that includes tools to help enhance and
facilitate economic development and job creation.
3-N internet Technology
Where many traditional economic development tools have focused on managing the costs '_
and availability of traditional infrastructure—roads, rail, utilities, etc.—the new economy
is increasingly dependent on reliable, redundant, cost effective, high bandwidth
telecommunications capabilities. While the United States was once a leader among ;
"wired" economies, its position has slipped dramatically as other countries have
2013 Legislative Policies 2g
Housing 8� Economic Development
facilitated investrnents in fiber-optic deployment (fiber to the premises), commitments to
true high speed internet capacity (100 mb to 1 gb) and improved networks (Intemet 2).
Recognizing that there is a policy debate regarding the role of government versus private
telecommunications companies in implementing the next generation of internet
capability, bringing about such capabilities is increasingly important to ensure that U.S.
companies in general and Minnesota companies in particular can compete effectively in
the global economy.
Metro Cities endorses comprehensive and regianal strategies to stimulate the
implementation of high speed, reliable and cost effective internet service that is
available throughout the state. Further, Metro Cities supports the repeal of
Minnesota Statute 237.19. Metro Cities opposes the adoption of state policies that
further restrict a city's ability to fund internet infrastructure.
3-O City Role in Environmental Protection and Sustainabie Development
Historically, cities have played a major role in environmental protection, particularly in
- water quality. Through the construction and operation of wastewater treatment and storm
water management systems, cities are a leader in protecting the surface water of the state.
In recent years, increased emphasis has been placed on protecting ground water and
removing impairments from storm water: In addition, there is increased emphasis on city
participation in controlling our carbon footprint and in promoting green development.
Metro Cities supports public and private environmental protection efforts to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions and to further protect surface and ground water. Metro
Cities also supports "green" design and construction techniques to the extent that
those techniques have been thoroughly tested and are truly environmentally
beneficial, economically sustainable, and represent sound building practices. Metro
Cities supports additional, feasible environmental protection with adequate funding
and incentives to comply.
Green jobs represent employment and entrepreneurial opportunities that are part of the
green economy, as defined in Minnesota statue 116.437J1, including the four industry
sectors of green products, renewable energy, green services and environmental
conservation. Minnesota's green jobs policies, strategies and investments need to lead to
high quality jobs with good wages and benefits, meeting current wage and labor laws.
3-P Impaired Waters
Metro Cities supports continued development of the metropolitan area in a manner
that is responsive to the market, but is cognizant of the need to protect the water
resources of the state and metro area. Since all types of properties are required to pay
storm water fees, Metro Cities opposes entity-specific exemptions from these fees. Metro
Cities supports the goals of the Clean Water Act and efforts at both the federal and state
2013 Legislative Policies 29
Housing & Economic Development
level to implement it.
Metro Cities supports continued funding of the framework passed in the 2009 ,
Legacy legislation for clean water to improve the region's ability to respond to
market demands for development and redevelopment, including dedicated funding
for surface water impairment assessments, Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL)
development, storm water construction grants and wastewater construction grants. `
Local units of government should not bear undue cost burdens associated with
completed TMDL reports. As recent TMDL reports show, non-point agricultural
sources are producing more run off pollution than urban areas at a rate of 13:1.
Cities must not be required as primary entities for funding the clean-up and
protection of state and regional water resources. Benefits of efforts must be
proportional to the costs incurred and agricultural sources must be held responsible
for their share of costs.
2013 Legislative Policies 30
Metro olitan A encies 4
p J C)
4-A Goais and Principles for Regional Governance
The Twin Cities metropolitan region is home to the majority of our state's population and
businesses and is poised for significant growth in the next two decades. At the same time,
our metropolitan region faces significant challenges and opportunities. The responses to
these opportunities and challenges will determine the future success of the region and its
competitiveness in our state, national and world economies.
The Metropolitan Council was created to manage the growth of the metropolitan region,
and cities are responsible for adhering to regional plans as they plan for local growth and
service delivery.
The region's cities are the Metropolitan Council's primary constituency, with regional
and local growth being primarily managed through city comprehensive planning and
implementation, and the delivery of a wide range of public services. To function
successfully, the Metropolitan Council must be accountable to and work in collaboration
with city governments.
The role of the Metropolitan Council is to set broad regional goals and to pravide cities
with technical assistance and incentives to achieve those goals. City governments are
responsible and best suited to provide local zoning, land use planning, development and
service delivery. Any additional roles or responsibilities for the Metropolitan Council
should be limited to specific statutory assignments or grants or authorization, and should
not usurp or conflict with local roles or processes, unless such changes have the consent
of the region's cities.
• Metro Cities supports an economically strong and vibrant region, and the
effective, efficient and equitable provision of regional infrastructure, services
and planning throughout the metropolitan area.
• Metro Cities supports the provision of approved regional systems and planning
that can be provided more effectively, efficiently or equitably on a regional level
- than at the local level by individuallocal units of government.
•'I'he Metropolitan Council must involve cities in the delivery of regional services
and planning and be responsive to local perspectives on regional issues, and be
required to provide opportunities for city participation on Council advisory
committees and task forces.
2013 Legislative Policies 31
Metropolitan Agencies
4-B Regional Governance Structure
Metro Cities supports the appointment of Metropolitan Council members by the
Governor with four year, staggered terms for members. The appointment of the
Metropolitan Council Chair should coincide with the term of the Governor.
Metro Cities supports a nominating committee process that maximizes participation '
and input by local officials. Consideration should be given to the creation of four
separate nominating committees, with committee representation from each quadrant of '
the region. Members of each committee should include three city officials, appointed by
Metro Cities, one county commissioner appointed by the Association of MN Counties or
a comparable entity, and three citizens appointed by the Governor. At least three of the
local officials should be elected officials. The Governor must be required to appoint from
the list of recommendations provided by the nominating committee, barring extraordinary
or unforeseen circumstances that would pre�ent adherence to the recommendations, any
reasons for which should be provided to the committee in writing, and be made part of
the public record. �
Metro Cities supports the appointment of Metropolitan Council members who have
demonstrated the ability to work with cities in a collaborative manner, and who
understand the diversity and the commonalities of the region, and the long-term I
implications of regional decision-making.
4-C Comprehensive Analysis of Metropotitan Council
Our region will continue to expand while simultaneously facing significant challenges ;
around the effective, efficient and equitable provision of resources and infrastructure,
Metro Cities believes that a comprehensive analysis of the Metropolitan Council is timely
and appropriate, to assure that the region is equipped to address the future needs of a
rapidly changing and growing metropolitan region.
Metro Cities supports an objective, forward thinking analysis of the Metropolitan i.__
Council that includes the Council's authority, activities, services, and its
geographical jurisdiction, and includes analysis of whether the Council is positioned
to be effective in the coming decades.
4 Oversight of Metropolitan Council
Metro Cities supports the bi-partisan Legislative Commission on Metropolitan
Government, or another entity, to monitor and review the Metropolitan Council's
activities and to provide transparency and accountability of the Metropolitan
Council operations and functions.
2013 Legislative Policies 32
Metropolitan Agencies
The Metropolitan Council should examine its scope of services to determine their benefit
and efficiency, and be open to alternative methods of delivery to assure that services are
provided at high levels of effectiveness for the region.
4-E Funding Regional Services
The Metropolitan Council should continue to fund its regional services and activities
through a combination of user fees, property taxes, and state and federal grants. The
Council should set user fees via an open process that includes public notices and public
hearings. User fees should be uniform by type of user and set at a level that supports
effective and efficient public services based on commonly accepted industry standards,
and allows for sufficient reserves to ensure long-term service and fee stability. Fee
proceeds should be used to fund regional services or programs for which they are
collected.
Metro Cities supports the use of property taxes and user fees to fund regional
projects so long as the benefit conferred on the region is proportional to the fee or
tax, and the fee or tax is comparable to the benefit cities receive in return.
4-F Regional Systems
Regional systems are statutorily defined as transportation, aviation, wastewater treatment
and recreational open space. The purpose of these regional systems and the Metropolitan
Council's authority over them is cleaxly outlined in state statute. In order to alter the
focus or expand the reach of any of these systems, the Metropolitan Council must seek a
statutory change.
The system plans prepared by the Metropolitan Council for the regional systems should
be specific in terms of the size, location and timing of regional investments in order to
allow for consideration in local comprehensive planning. System plans should clearly
state the criteria by which local plans will be judged for consistency and the criteria that
will be used to find that a local plan is more likely than not to have a substantial impact
on or contain a substantial departure from metropolitan system plans.
Metro Cities supports additional regional systems only if there is a compelling
metropolitan problem or concern that can best be addressed through the
designation. Common characteristics of the four existing regional systems include public
ownership of the system and its components and an established regional or state funding
source. These chaxacteristics should be present in any new regional system that might be
established. Any proposed additional regional system must have an established regional
or state funding source.
2013 Legislative Policies 33
Metropolitan Agencies
4-G Review of Local Comprehensive Plans
In reviewing local comprehensive plans and plan amendments, the Metropolitan
Council should:
• Recognize that its role is to review and comment, unless it is found that the local plan
is more likely than not to have a substantial impact on or contain a substantial
departure from one of the four system plans;
�
• Be aware of the statutory time constraints imposed by the Legislature on plan
amendments and development applications;
f
• Provide for immediate effectuation of plan amendments that have no potential for
substantial irnpact on systems plans;
�
• Require the information needed for the Metropolitan Council to complete its review, k
but not prescribe additional �content or format beyond that which is required by the r _,
Metropolitan Land Use Planning Act (LUPA); �'
• Work in a cooperative and timely manner toward the resolution of outstanding issues.
When a city's local comprehensive plan is deemed incompatible with the Met ,
Council's systems plans, Metro Cities supports a formal appeals process that includes `
a peer review. Metro Cities opposes the imposition of sanctions or monetary penalties
when a city's local comprehensive plan is deemed incompatible with the Met
Council's systems plans or the plan fails to meet a statutory deadline when the city
has made legitimate efforts to meet Met Council requirements. ,--
�
• Work with affected cities and other organizations such as the Pollution Control
Agency, Department of Natural Resources, Department of Health and other -
stakeholders to identify common ground and resolve conflicts between respective
goals for flexible residential development and achieving consistency with the
Council's system plans and policies. �
�
• Require entities, such as private businesses, non profits, or local units of government,
among others, whose actions could adversely affect a comprehensive plan, to be
subject to the same qualifications and/or regulations as the city.
4-H Comprehensive Planning Process
Metro Cities supports an examination of the comprehensive planning process to
make sure that the process is streamlined and efficient, so as to assist in alleviating
excessive cost burdens or duplicative or unnecessary planning requirements by
municipalities in the comprehensive planning process. Metro Cities supports
resources to assist cities in meeting regional goals as part of the comprehensive '
planning process.
2013 Legislative Policies 34
Metropolitan Agencies
4-I Comprehensive Pianning Schedule
Cities are required to submit comprehensive plan updates to the Metropolitan Council
every 10 years, the most recent of which was due in 2008. A city's comprehensive plan
represents a community's vision of how the city should grow and develop or redevelop,
ensure adequate housing, provide essential public infrastructure and services, protect
natural areas and meet other community objectives.
Metro Cities recognizes that the merit of aligning comprehensive plan timelines with the
release of census data. However, the comprehensive plan process is expensive, time
consuming and labor intensive for cities, and the timing for the submission of
comprehensive plans should not be altered solely to better align with census data. If
_ sufficient valid reasons exist for the schedule for the next round of comprehensive plans
to be changed or expedited, cities should be provided with financial resources to assist
them in preparing the next round of plans.
Metro Cities opposes cities being forced into a state of perpetual planning as a result
of regional and legislative actions. Should changes be made to the comprehensive
planning schedule, Metro Cities supports financial and other resources to assist
cities in preparing and incorporating policy changes in their local planning efforts.
Metro Cities supports a 10-year time frame for comprehensive plan submissions.
4-J Local Zoning Authority
Local governments are responsible for zoning and local officials should have full
authority to approve variances to remain flexible in response to the unique land use needs
of their own community. Local zoning decisions, and the implementation of cities'
comprehensive plans, should not be conditioned upon the approval of the Metropolitan
Council or any other governmental agency.
Metro Cities supports local authority over land use and zoning decisions, and
opposes the creation of non-local appeals boards with the authority to supersede city
zoning decisions.
4-K Regional Growth
The most recent regional population forecasts projects a population of 3,743,000 people
by 2040.
Metro Cities recognizes cities' responsibility to plan for sustainable growth patterns that
integrate transportation, housing, paxks, open space and economic development that will
result in a region better equipped to manage population growth, to provide a high quality
2013 Legislative Policies 35
Metropolitan Agencies
of life for a growing and increasingly diverse metropolitan area population and improved
environmental health.
In developing local comprehensive plans to fit within a regional framework, adequate
sta.te and regional financial resources and incentives, and maximum flexibility around
local planning decisions, are imperative. The regional framework should assist cities in i
managing growth while being responsive to the individual qualities, characteristics and
needs of inetropolitan cities, and should encourage sub-regional cooperation and
coordination. ':
In order to accommodate this growth in a manner that preserves the region's high
quality of life:
• Natural resource protection will have to be balanced with growth and
development/reinvestment; '
i _;
• Significant new resources will have to be provided for transportation and transit;
• New households will have to be incorporated into the core cities, first and second-ring `
suburbs, and developing cities through both development and redevelopment.
!
In order for regional and local planning to result in the successful implementation of `
regional policies: ,
• The State of Minnesota must contribute additional financial resources, particularly in `
the areas of transportation and transit, reinvestment, affordable housing development,
and the preservation of parks and open space. If funding for regional infrastructure is
not adequate, cities should not be responsible for meeting the growth forecast set �
forth by the Metropolitan Council.
• The Metropolitan Council and Legislature must work to pursue levels of state and �
federal transportation funding that are adequate to meet identified transportation and
transit needs in the metropolitan area. ��--
• The Metropolitan Council must recognize the limitations of its authority and continue
to wark with cities in a collaborative, incentives-based manner.
• Metropolitan counties, adjacent counties and school districts must be brought more !
thoroughly into the discussion due to the critical importance of facilities and services �
such as county roads and public schools in accommodating forecasted growth,
• Greater recognition must be given to the fact that the "true" metropolitan region ;
extends beyond the traditional seven-county area and the need to work collaboratively
with adjacent counties in Minnesota and Wisconsin, and the cities within those
counties. The region faces environmental, transportation, and land-use issues that ;
cannot be solved by the seven-county metro area alone. Metro Cities supports an
2013 Legislative Policies 36
Metropolitan Agencies
analysis to determine the impacts af Metropolitan Council's growth management
policies and infrastructure investments on the growth and development of the collar
counties, and the impacts of growth in the collax counties on the metropolitan area.
4-L Natural Resource Protection
Metro Cities supports the Metropolitan Council's efforts to compile and maintain
an inventory and assessment of regionally significant natural resources for the
purpose of providing local communities with additional information and technical
assistance. The state and region play significant roles in the protection of natural
resources. Any steps taken by the state or Metropolitan Council regarding the protection
of natural resources must recognize that:
• The protection of natural resources is significant to a multi-county area that is home
to more than 50 percent of the state's population and a travel destination for many
. more. Given the limited availability of resources and the artificial nature of the
metropolitan area's borders, neither the region nor individual metropolitan
communities would be well served by assuming primary responsibility for financing
and protecting these resources.
• The completion of local Natural Resource Inventories and Assessments (NRI/A) is
not a regional system nor is it a required component of local comprehensive plans
under the Metropolitan Land Use Planning Act.
• The protection of natural resources should be balanced with the need to accommodate
growth and development, reinvest in established communities, encourage more
affordable housing and provide transportation.and transit connections.
• Decisions about the zoning or land-use designations either within or outside a public
park, nature preserve or other protected axea are, and should remain, the responsibility
of local units of government
Metro Cities supports the Metropolitan Council's efforts to compile and maintain
an inventory and assessment of regionally significant natural resources for the
purpose of providing local communities with additional information and technical
assistance.
Metro Cities urges the Legislature and/or the Metropolitan Council to provide
financial assistance for the preservation of regionally significant natural resources.
4-M inflow and Infiltration (I/l) �
The Metropolitan Council's Water Resources Management Plan established an UI
surchazge in 2007 on cities that are determined by MCES to be contributing unacceptable
2013 Legislative Policies 37
Metropolitan Agencies
amounts of storm water to the MCES wastewater treatment system. Since the inception of
the surcharge program, 50 cities have been identified as excessive I/I contributors. This
number is subject to change, depending on rain events, and any city in the metropolitan ';
area could be affected.
While Metro Cities recognizes the importance of controlling I/I because it affects the
size, and therefore the cost, of wastewater treatment systems and because excessive I/I in
one city can affect development capacity of another, we are concerned about the potential
for cities to incur increasingly exorbitant costs, and decreasing benefits, in their on-going
efforts to mitigate excessive UL
Metro Cities supported the recommendations of the 2010 I/I Demand Charge Task !
Force for a second phase, on-going surcharge program to address I/I mitigation in
the region. Metro Cities further supports adjustments to the flow methodolog,y used
to measure excess I/I that allow for the normalizing of precipitation variability. :
Metro Cities also encourages the Council to work with cities on community-specific
issues that fall outside the scope of the task force report and recommendations.
Metro Cities continues to monitor the surcharge program, and encourages the
Metropolitan Council to support state financial assistance for Metro Area I/I
mitigation through future Clean Water Legacy Act appropriations or similar
legislation.
Metro Cities supports continued state capital assistance to provide grants to metro
area cities for the purpose of mitigating inflow and infiltration problems into
municipal wastewater collection systems.
4-N Water Supply
The 2005 Legislature authorized the Metropolitan Council to carry out planning activities
to address the water supply needs of the Metro Area, and to establish a Water Supply
Advisory Committee. Its work includes analyzing technical water supply/use data, the
development of a master metro area water supply plan, recommendations for clarifying
roles of local, regional and state governments and streamlining and consolidating
approval processes, and recommendations for funding future planning and capital
investrnents.
The Master Water Supply Plan now in place serves as a framework for assisting and
guiding communities in their water supply planning, without usurping local decision
making processes. As the plan is implemented, many cities will conduct their own
analyses for use in water supply planning. Local studies should be given equal weight in '
regional water supply planning.
In addition to the Metropolitan Council, there are currently at least five state agencies '
with water related jurisdiction. There are also several federal agencies involved in water
2013 Legislative Policies 38
Metropolitan Agencies
issues. Metro Cities encourages the Metropolitan Council to consider the inter-
relationships of wastewater treatment, storm water management and water supply. Any
state and regional regulations and processes should be clearly stated in the Water Supply
Plan. Further, regional monitoring and data collection benefits should be borne as shared
expenses between the regional and local units of government.
The 2010 Legislature expanded the .membership of the Advisory Committee to include
four officials from the collar counties, and extended the Advisory Committee to
December, 2012. The extension of the committee, which includes five metro area
municipal officials, will allow the committee to continue to play a strong role in the
development and direction of water supply planning activities as the Master Plan is
further developed and refined with additional information and data as they become
available.
Metro Cities opposes the insertion of the Metropolitan Council as another regulator
in the water supply arena. Metro Cities further opposes the elevation of water
supply to "Regional System" status, or the assumption of Met Council control and
management of municipal water supply infrastructure. At this time, we oppose any
regional taxes or fees for water supply planning.
Metro Cities supports efforts to clarify local, regional and state water supply roles,
and on-going analytical work to streamline and consolidate the myriad and often
conflicting water supply permitting processes.
Metro Cities supports efforts to identify capital funding sources to assist with
municipal water supply projects.
4-O Service Availability Charge (SAC)
Metro Cities supports a SAC program that emphasizes equity, simplification and
lower rates. The Met Council adopted changes to its SAC program that were
implemented in January, 2010. Under the new changes, when a redeveloping property's
new use requires lower wastewater capacity than what was used in the prior seven years,
SAC credits are limited to the amount needed on the site for the new use. A property
developing at the same or lesser wastewater demand will not incur SAC nor get credits.
Because of the economic recession, SAC revenues have declined in recent years. In
response, the Metropolitan Council sought and received legislative authority in 2010 to
allow for a temporary reduction in the amount SAC annually pays for debt service and to
shift some of the cost to the municipal wastewater charge. Metro Cities argued
successfully for a`shift back' mechanism and sunset provision in the bill to make sure
the new law was not overly permissive. SAC receipts have increased, but are still
underperforming relative to projections.
2013 Legislative Policies 39
Metropotitan Agencies
Metro Cities supports a"growth pays for growth" approach to SAC. This policy
was adopted by the Met Council but requires a statutory change.
Metro Cities supports flexibility with regard to the timing of the sunset of the SAC
shift, and ongoing efforts by the Metropolitan Council, with input from
municipalities, to assure the long term sustainability and efficacy of the SAC '
program and the regional wastewater system, including a comprehensive and long '
range study of the overall SAC program and structure.
Metro Cities supports a review of MCES' customer service policies, to ensure that
its processes are responsive and transparent to communities, businesses and
residents. Metro Cities supports additional outreach by MCES to users of the SAC
program to promote knowledge and understanding of SAC charges and policies.
,.
�
4-P Funding Regional Parks & Open Space �
In the seven-county metropolitan area, regional parks essentially serve as state parks, and j
the state should continue to provide capital funding for the acquisition, development and
improvement of these parks. State funding apart from Legacy funds should equa140
percent of the operating budget for regional parks. Legacy funds for parks and trails �
should be balanced between metro and greater Minnesota. �
,
,
4-Q Livable Communities
� r� ��
The Livable Communities Act (LCA) is operated by the Metropolitan Council and '
provides a voluntary, incentive-based approach to affordable housing development,
brown field clean up and mixed-use, transit-friendly development and redevelopment. -
Metro Cities strongly supports the continuation of this approach, which has been widely
accepted and is fully utilized by local communities. Since its inception in 1995, the LCA
program has generated billions of dollaxs of private and public investment, created
thousands of jobs and added thousands of affordable housing units in the region. '._
Use of interest earnings from LCA funds should be limited to covering the costs of
administering the program. Remaining interest earnings not used for program
administration should be considered part of the LCA funds and used to fund grant
requests from the established LCA accounts, according to established funding criteria.
Metro Cities supports statutory changes to assure that all metropolitan area cities
are eligibie to participate in the Livable Communities Demonstration Account
(LCDA).
Metro Cities supports increased funding and flexible eligibility requirements in the
LCDA in order to assist communities with development that may not be exclusively '
2013 Legislative Policies 40
Metropolitan Agencies
market driven or market proven in their particular location and in order to support
important development and redevelopment goals.
Metro Cities opposes changes to the LCDA program that constrain flexibility
around statutory goals, program requirements and criteria.
Metro Cities opposes funding reductions to the Livable Communities Program and
the transfer or use of these funds for purposes outside of the LCA program.
Metro Cities supports statutory modifications in the LCDA to reflect the linkages
among the goals, municipal objectives, and Met Council system objectives.
Metro Cities supports the use of LCA funds for projects in transit improvement
areas, as defined in statute, as long as funding levels for general LCA programs are
' adequate to meet program goals and the program remains accessible to
participating communities.
4-R Density
Any Met Council density policy must take into account the impacts of market trends on
city development and redevelopment activities.
Metro Cities supports a reasonable Met Council density policy that bases density
projections on actual development patter�ns, is flexible, and accommodates cities at
various development stages.
2013 Legisiative Policies 4�
Metropolitan Agencies
2013 Legislative Policies 42
� � Trans ortation 5
p �)
5-A Transportation Funding
Under the current financing structure, transportation needs in the metropolitan region
continue to be severely underfunded. Our transportation funding system relies heavily on
the gas tax for roads and the motor vehicle sales tax (MVST) for transit. Automobiles are
becoming more fuel efficient and MVST receipts continue to lag behind projections,
resulting in funding levels that continually fail to meet demand. Until a more sufficient
�' and equitable transportation financing model is put in place, we must maximize existing
resources. Funding and planning for our regional and statewide transportation systems
must be coordinated at the federal, state, regional and local levels to optimally achieve
long term needs and goals.
� Cities lack the authority to use additional tools for city street improvements with
resources restricted to property taYes and special assessments. It is imperative that
- alternative revenue generating authority be granted to municipalities for this purpose to
_ relieve the burden on the property tax systern.
Metro Cities strongly supports stable and sufficient statewide transportation
funding and local tools to meet the long term transportation system needs of our
region. Metro Cities also supports state financial assistance, as well as innovations in
design and construction, to offset the impacts of regional transportation
construction projects on local communities and businesses.
5 Regional Transit System
The Twin Cities Metropolitan Area needs a multi-modal regional transit system as part of
a comprehen.�ive transportation strategy that serves both commuters and the transit
____ dependent. The transit system should be composed of a mix of HOV lanes, Bus Rapid
Transit, express and regular route bus service, exclusive transit ways, light rail transit and
commuter rail corridors designed to connect residential, employment, retail and
entertainment centers. The system should be regularly monitored and adjusted to ensure
that routes of service correspond to the region's changing travel pattems.
Metro Cities strongly supported the'/a cent sales tax passed by the 2008 Legislature. This
tax is levied in the metropolitan area and dedicated to transit. The sales tax represents a
commitment to investment in our region's transitways. Metro Cities opposes using the
currently dedicated Metropolitan Transportation Area sales tax proceeds to further
subsidize funding for Metro Transit and suburban transit providers that are the
responsibility of the Legislature and Metropolitan Council. Any increase to the sales
tax already dedicated to transit should be used to benefit the transit system as a whole.
2013 Legislative Policies 43
Transportation
Metro Cities is also opposed to legislative or Metropolitan Council directives that
constrain the ability of inetropolitan transit providers to provide a full range of
transit services, including reverse commute routes, suburb-to-suburb routes, transit ;
hub feeder services or new, experimental services that may show a low rate of
operating cost recovery from the fare box.
In the interest of including all potential options in the pursuit of a regionally balanced
transit system, Metro Cities supports the repeal of the law passed in 2002 which imposed
a gag order on the Dan Patch Commuter Rail Line.
Current congestion levels and forecasted population growth require a stable, reliable and
growing source of revenue for transit construction and operations so that our metropolitan
region can adequately and strategically meet its transportation needs to remain
economically competitive. Metro Cities supports an effective, efficient and
comprehensive regional transit system as an invaluable component in meeting the
multimodal transportation needs of the metropolitan region and to the region's economic '
vibrancy and quality of life. �
Metro Cities supports a regional governance structure that can ensure a measurably
reliable and efficient system that recognizes the diverse transit needs of our region
and addresses the funding needs for all components of the system. ,
5-C Transit Financing -
The Twin Cities metropolitan area is served by a regional transit system that is expanding ,
to include rail transit and dedicated busways. Any operating subsidies necessary to
support this system should come from a regional or statewide funding source. The
property taxpayers of individual cities and counties should not be required to fund the
operation of specific transit lines or routes of service within this regional system. MVST
revenue projections have not been reliable and the Legislature has repeatedly reduced
general fund support for Metropolitan Transit. As a result the regional transit providers
continue to operate at a funding deficit.
Shifting demographics in the metropolitan region will mean increased demand for
transit in areas with and without current transit service. Metro Cities supports '
stable and growing revenue sources to fund the operating budget for all regional
transit providers at a level sufficient to meet the growing operational and capital :
transit needs of the region and to expand the system to areas that currently have
little or no transit options.
2013 Legislative Policies 44
Transportation
5-D Street Improvement Districts
Street improvement districts allow cities in developed and developing areas to fund new
construction as well as reconstruction and maintenance efforts.
The street improvement district is designed to allow cities, through the use ofa fair and
objective fee structure, to create a district or districts within the city where fees will be
raised but must also be spent. Street improvement districts would also aid cities under
5,000, giving them an alternative to the property tax system and special assessments.
Metro Cities supports the authority of local units of government to establish street
improvement districts.
5-E Highway Turnbacks & Funding
Cities do not have the financial capacity, other than significant property tax increases, to
absorb the additional roadway responsibilities without new funding sources. The existing
municipal turnback fund is not adequate based on contemplated turnbacks. The 2008
__, transportation finance bill added approximately $6 million to the Metro Turnback Fund,
bringing the fund up to $20 million, which falls short of the $100 million needed.
Metro Cities supports jurisdictional reassignment or turnback of roads on a phased
basis using functional classifications and other appropriate criteria subject to a
corresponding mechanism for adequate funding of roadway improvements and
continued maintenance.
Metro Cities does not support the wholesale turnback of county or state roads
without the total cost, agreed to by the municipality, being reimbursed to the city in
a timely manner.
5-F "3C" Transportation Planning Process: Elected Officials' Role
The Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) was developed to meet federal requirements,
designating the Metropolitan Council as the organization that is responsible for a
continuous, comprehensive and cooperative (3C) transportation planning process to
allocate federal funds among metropolitan area projects. This process requirement was
reinforced by the 1991 Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA), the
1998 Transportation Efficiency Act for the 21 st Century (TEA21) and the 2005 Safe,
Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users
(SAFETEA-LU).
Metro Cities supports continuation of the TAB with a majority of locally elected
officials as members and participating in the process.
2013 Legislative Policies 45
Transportation
5-G Photo Enforcement of Traffic Laws
Enforcement of traffic laws with cameras has been demonstrated to improve driver '
compliance and safety.
Metro Cities supports the use of photo enforcement technology.
5-H Airport Noise Mitigation
The MAC and the state should seek long-term solutions to fund the full mitigation
package as adopted in 1996 for all homes in the 64-60 DNL impact area. Noise
abatement efforts should be paid for by fees and charges collected from airport users, as
well as state and federal funds. Furthermore, unless mitigation funding is provided, Metro
Cities opposes any legislation that requires a property owner to disclose those properties
that lie within 64-60 DNL noise contours.
Acknowledging that the communities closest to MSP and reliever airports are
significantly impacted by noise, traffic, and other numerous expansion-related issues.
Metro Cities supports the broad goal of providing MSP-impacted communities
greater representation on the MAC. Metro Cities wants to encourage continued
communication between the MAC commissioners and the cities they represent.
Balancing the needs of MAC, the business community and airport host cities and their
residents requires open communication, planning and coordination. Cities must be
viewed as partners with the MAC in resolving the differences that arise out of airport ,
projects and the development of adjacent parcels. Regular contact between the MAC and
cities throughout the project proposal process will enhance communication and problem
solving. �
Metro Cities supports noise abatement programs and expenditures to minimize the
impacts of Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) operated facilities on
neighboring communities. The MAC should determine the design and geographic ;
reach of these programs only after a thorough public input process that considers
the priorities and concerns of impacted cities and their residents.
5-I Cities Under 5,000 Population
Cities under 5,000 in population do not directly receive any non-property tax funds for
collector and arterial streets. Current CSAH distributions to metropolitan counties are
inadequate to provide for the needs of smaller cities in the metropolitan area. Possible
funding sources include the five-percent set-aside account in the Highway User Tax
Distribution Fund, modification to county municipal accounts, street improvement
districts, andlor state general funds.
2013 Legislative Policies 46
Transportation
Metro Cities supports establishing criteria, such as the number of average daily
trips, to provide funding qualifications and a distribution method, in a small city
local road improvement program.
' 5-J County State Aid Highway (CSAH) Distribution Formula
Even with the additional resources provided in 2008 by the Legislature through the
transportation finance bill, significant needs remain in the metro area CSAH system. The
additional revenue for the CSAH system will result in more projects being completed
faster, however, greater pressure is being placed on municipalities to participate in cost
sharing activities, encumbering an already over-burdened local funding system. When the
alternative is not building or maintaining roads, cities bear not only the costs of their local
systems but also pay upward of fifty percent of county road projects. Metro Cities
supports special or additional funding for cities that have burdens of additional cost
participation in county road projects.
CSAH eligible roads were designated by county engineers in 1956 and although only
10% of the CSAH roads are in the metro area, they account for nearly 50% of the vehicle
miles traveled. The new CSAH formula passed by the Legislature in 2008 increased the
amount of CSAH funding for the metropolitan area only from 18% in 2007 to 21% in
2011. The new formula will better account for needs in the Mefropolitan Area, but the
_, new formula must only serve as is a first step in providing additional resources for the
Metropolitan Area.
Metro Cities supports a new CSAH formula more equitably designed to fund the
needs of our metropolitan region.
5 Municipal Input/Consent for Trunk Highways and County Roads
Minnesota Statutes direct the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) to
_ submit detailed plans with city cost estimates at a point one and a half to two years prior
to bid letting, at which time public hearings are held for citizen/business/rnunicipal input.
If MnDOT does not concur with requested changes, it may appeal. Currently, that process
would take a m�imum of three and a half months and the results of the appeals board are
binding on both the city and MnDOT.
Metro Cities opposes ehanges to current statutes that would allow MnDOT to
disregard the appeals board ruling for state trunk highways. Such a change would
significantly minimize MnDOT's need to negotiate in good faith with cities for
appropriate project access and alignment, and would render the public hearing and
appeals process meaningless. Metro Cities also opposes the elimination of the county
road municipal consent and appeal process for these reasons.
2013 Legislative Po(icies 47
Transporfation
5-L Plat Authority
Current law grants counties review and comment authority for access and drainage issues
for city plats abutting county roads.
Metro Cities opposes any statutory change that would grant counties veto power or
that would shorten the 120-day review and permit process time.
5 City Speed Limit Control
A nationally recognized Minnesota program, Toward Zero Deaths, is working to create a
culture for which traffic fatalities and serious injuries are no longer acceptable through
the integrated application of education, engineering, enforcement, and emergency
medical and trauma services.
On residential roads, where traffic safety also affects pedestrians and users of alternative
transportation modes, Metro Cities supports a reduction in the state-wide default
speed limit from 30 to 25 mph. Metro Cities also supports design standards that
result in slower speeds on local roads. In the event of a uniform speed limit
reduction, Metro Cities supports increased state funding for education and
enforcement.
At cities' or counties' discretion, Metro Cities also supports a year round reduction `
of speed limits within 500 feet of any city or county parks and schools.
5 MnDOT Maintenance Budgef
The state has abrogated its responsibility for maintaining major roads throughout the state
by requiring, through omission, that cities bear the burden of maintenance on major state
roads. Cities should be compensated equitably for providing a service that traditionally
has been borne by the state. MNDOT should also be required to meet standards adopted '
by cities through local ordinances or reimburse cities for labor, equipment and material
used on the state's behalf to improve public safety or meet local standards.
Metro Cities' supports MnDOT taking fu11 responsibility for maintaining state
owned infrastructure within city limits. ,
5-O Transit Taxing District
The transit taxing district, which funds the capital cost of transit service in the
Metropolitan Area through the property tax system, is inequitable. Because the !
boundaries of the transit ta�ing district do not correspond with any rational service line,
cities in the taxing district or out of the taxing district are contributing unequally to the
2013 Legislative Policies 48
Transporfation
transit service in the Metropolitan Area. This inequity should be corrected.
Metro Cities supports a stable revenue source to fund both the capital and operating
costs for transit at the Metropolitan Council. However, Metro Cities does not
support the expansion of the transit taxing district without a corresponding increase
in service. To do so would create additional property taxes without a corresponding
benefit.
5-P Complete Streets
,
A complete street may include: sidewalks, bike lanes (or wide paved shoulders), special
bus lanes, comfortable and accessible public transportation stops, frequent and safe
crossing opportunities, median islands, accessible pedestrian signals, curb extensions,
narrower travel lanes and more.
A complete street in a rural area will differ from a complete street in a highiy urban area,
but both are designed to balance safety and convenience for everyone using the road.
Metro Cities supports options in state design guidelines for streets that would give
cities greater flexibility to:
• safely accommodate all modes of travel
• address storm water needs
• ensure livability in the appropriate context for each city.
However, Metro Cities opposes state imposed mandates that would increase street
infrastructure improvement costs in locations and instances where providing access
for alternative modes including cycling and walking are deemed unnecessary or
inappropriate as determined by local jurisdictions.
2013 Legislative Policies 49
Transporfation
2013 Legislative Policies 50
Committee Rosters (6)
Housing & Economic Development
Anne Mavity (Chair), Councilmember, St. Louis Park
Jason Aarsvold, Dir. Comm. Dev. & EDA, Brooklyn Park
Gene Abbott, Councilmernber, Savage
Patty Acomb, Councilmember, Minnetonka
Karl Batalden, Housing Specialist/Assoc. Planner, Woodbury
Cecile Bedor, Planning & Econ. Dev., St. Paul
Bryan Belisle, Councilmember, White Bear Lake
Joni Bennett, Councilmember, Edina
Mitch Berg, Administrator, Bayport
Jim Bownik, Asst. City Administrator, Lauderdale
Ultan Duggan, Councilmember, Mendota Heights
Jenni Faulkner, Community Dev. Dir., Burnsville
Mary Gaasch, Councilmember, Lauderdale
Shannon Guernsey, Executive Director, MN NAHRO
Bryan Hartman, Program Manager, Bloomington
Jon Hohenstein, Community Dev. Director, Eagan
Schawn Johnson, Asst. to the City Manager, New Brighton
Dean Johnston, Mayor, Lake Elmo
Anne Kane, Community Devel. Dir., White Bear Lake
Michael Leek, Community Dev. Dir. Shakopee
Melissa Lesch, Gov't Reiations Rep., Minneapolis
Patty Lilledahi, Dir. of Business Devel. & Finance, St. Paul
Lorrie Louder, Dir. of Business & IGR Affairs, St. Paul Port Authority
Mary McComber, Councilmember, Oak Park Heights
Doug Menikheim, Councilmember, Stillwater
Brad Nielsen, Planning Director, Shorewood
Bruce Nordquist, Comm. Dev. Dir., Apple Valley
Anne Norris, City Manager, Crystal
Kim O'Brien, St. Paul
Terence Quigley, Councilmember, Shoreview
Michael Sable, Asst. to the City Manager, Brooklyn Park
Mark Sather, City Manager, White Bear Lake
Mary Sherry, Councilmember, Burnsville
Bob Streetar, Community Development Dir., Oakdale
Erin Stwora, Asst. to City Admr., Dayton
Tony Wagner, Councilmember, Minnetonka
Craig Waldron, Administrator, Oakdale
Brad Wiersum, Councilmember, Minnetonka
Julie Wischnack, Community Dev. Dir., Minnetonka
2013 Legisiative Policies 51
Roster
Metropolitan Agencies
Ady Wickstrom (Chair), Councilmember, Shoreview
Susan Arntz, Administrator, Waconia
David Beaudet, Mayor, Oak Park Heights
Frank Boyles, City Manager, Prior Lake '
Bob Bruton, Councilmember, North St. Paul
Ultan Duggan, Councilmember, Mendota Heights
Jo Emerson, Mayor, White Bear Lake
Sarah Erickson, Gov't Relations Rep., St. Paul
Cheryl Fischer, Mayor, Minnetrista
Elizabeth Glidden, Councilmember, Minneapolis
Tom Goodwin, Councilmember, Apple Valley
Chuck Haas, Councilmember, Hugo
Heather Johnston, CFO, Dir. of Admin. Services, Burnsville
_
E izabeth Kautz, Ivlayor, Burnsville
Thomas Link, Comm. Dev. Dir., Inver Grove Heights
Lorrie Louder, Dir. Of Business & IGR Affairs, St. Paul Port Authority
Anne Mavity, Councilmember, St. Louis Park
Tim McNeil, Councilmember, Dayton '
Mark Nagel, Asst. City Admr., Elko New Market
Sarah Reinhardt, Mayor, Spring Park
Judd Schetnan, Director of Gov't Affairs, Metropolitan Council '
Teny Schneider, Mayor, Minnetonka
Anne Smith, Councilmember, Lake Elmo
Jennifer White, Council Assoc., Minneapolis '
Pierre Willette, Govt. Relations Rep., Minneapolis
Municipal Revenue & Taxation
Tom Lawell (Chair), Administrator, Apple Valley
Amy Brendmoen, Councilmember, St. Paul ,
Tom Burt, City Manager, Golden Valley
Heather Butkowski, Administrator, Lauderdale
Mark Casey, City Manager, St. Anthony Village
Sandy Christensen, Finance Director, West St. Paul
Bill Coughlin, Councilmembr, Burnsville
Bruce DeJong, Finance Director, Shorewood
Jim Dickinson, Administrator, Andover
Ultan Duggan, Councilmember, Mendota Heights
Lori Economy-Scholler, Chief Financial Officer, Bloomington
Jerilyn Erickson, Finance Director, Prior Lake
Sarah Erickson, Gov't Relations Rep., St. Paul
2013 Legislative Policies 52
Roster
Jerry Faust, Mayor, St. Anthony Village
Marcia Glick, City Manager, Robbinsdale
Susan Iverson, Dir. of Finance/Admin. Services, Arden Hills
Marvin Johnson, Mayor, Independence
Schawn Johnson, Asst. to the City Admr., New Brighton
Heather Johnston, CFO, Dir. of Admin. 5ervices, Burnsville
Jim Keinath, Administrator, Circle Pines
Merrill King Finance Director, Minnetonka
Melissa Lesch, Gov't Relations Rep., Minneapolis
Julie Linnihan, Finance Dir., Shakopee
Dean Lotter, City Manager, New Brighton
Kristi Luger, City Manager, Excelsior
Scott Lund, Mayor, Fridley
Joe Lynch, Admr., Inver Grove Heights
Bill Malinen, City Manager, Roseville
Justin Miller, City Admr., Mendota Heights
Rebecca Olson, Exec. Asst. to the City Manager, Blaine �
Samantha Orduno, Administrator, Dayton
Lori Peterson, HR Dir., Eagan
Terry Post, Admr., Long Lake
Don Rambow, Finance Dir., White Bear Lake
Gene Ranieri, IGR Director, Minneapolis
Bruce Sanders, Councilmember, Coon Rapids
Ryan Schroeder, Administrator, Cottage Grove
Danna Elling Schultz, Councilmember, Hastings
Josh Sprague, Councilmember, Edina
Steven Stahmer, Admr., Rogers
Lisa Wieland, Finance Dir., Rogers
Dick Woodruff, Councilmember, Shorewood
Wally Wysopal, City Manager, North St. Paul
Jason Ziemer, City Manager, Maple Plain
Transportation & General Government
Dick Swanson (Chair), Councilmember, Blaine
Steve Albrecht, Dir. Public Works/City Eng., Burnsville
Dick Allendorf, Councilmember, Minnetonka
Doug Anderson, Mayor, Dayton
Susan Arntz, Administrator, Waconia
Geralyn Barone, City Manager, Minnetonka
Joni Bennett, Councilmember, Edina
Frank Boyles, City Manager, Prior Lake
Larry Brown, Director of Public Works, Shorewood
Bob Bruton, Councilmember, North St. Paul
2013 Legislative Policies 53
Roster
Paul Burke, Councilmember, Sunfish Lake
Ultan Duggan, Councilmember, Mendota Heights
Sarah Erickson, Gov't. Rel. Rep., St. Paul
Warren Erickson, Councilmember, Prior Lake
Mike Funk, Administrator, Minnetrista
Steven Gallagher, Councilmember, Newport
Ruth Grendahl, Councilmember, Apple Valley
Roger Hackbarth, Councilmember, Maple Plain
Mary Hamann-Roland, Mayor, Apple Valley
Gary Hansen, Councilmember, Eagan '
Tom Harmening, City Manager, St. Louis Park
James Hovland, Mayor, Edina !
Dean Johnston, Mayor, Lake Elmo '
Dan Kealey, Councilmember, Burnsville
R. Michael Leek, Comm. Dev. Dir, Shakopee
Robert Lilligren, Councilmember, Minneapolis
Dean� Lotter, City Manager, New Brighton
Lorrie Louder, Dir. of Bus. & Gov't Affairs, St. Paul Port Auth. !
Allen Lovejoy, Public Works, St. Paul
Scott Lund, Mayor, Fridley
Mary McComber, Councilmember, Oak Park Heights
Mark McNeill, Administrator, Shakopee
Mike Mornson, City Administrator, Hopkins
Paul Oehme, Public Works Dir., Chanhassen
Becky Petryk, Councilmember, Hugo
Michael Ridley, City Planner, Eagan
Will Rossbach, Mayor, Maplewood '
Dan Ryan, Councilmember, Brooklyn Center
Sue Sandahl, Councilmember, Richfield
Sue Sanger, Councilmember, St. Louis Park
Judd Schetnan, Dir. of Gov't Affairs, Metropolitan Council
Steve Schmidt, Councilmember, Anoka
Danna Elling Schultz, Councilmember, Hastings '.
Russ Stark, Councilmember, St. Paul
Meg Tilley, Councilmember, Eagan
Bethany Tjornhom, Councilmember, Chanhassen -
Ady Wickstrom, Councilmember, Shoreview
Pierre Willette, Gov't Relations Rep., Minneapolis
2013 Legislative Policies 54
MLINI�IP�4L
LF��IS[�ATI��E
C��►�MI�SI�N
�xA�
� ���
W��.�� � �
�x �� � � �
�
. ` ��..�� ���r
201 Le lsla��ve �ro =s���am
3 g ��� �� �� ��
LL.� �.���: ��A
�+ k pA i� �� < yey�.:.
s x
},a„'�1A A i ''�'�' � .
`S <z
��awJ�' � � � d'n
`�, � x
�� p � �� �
�"' �' � �"' �,
. ��; ��
� ✓�v'�.. :�.xtta
3s °^n x
� ���
� � �;�+`a �� t �'�y;
,' � � � �' � � s �"�� ���
. Z K ; ���. q � V � %��* ��qb�^.�^, �.
. �� �ix��� `� � ��� � ��
k�`4 � ��%p� T�.; �, ;���� ? . �� A ��.
� A d #� a° j K R d.
A � a �
x�� a
�`�°#�,,° °, �a �,a, s
� �*r r�
�'� ' E �:.� �'�"�`�`�H � �
j �'�f,A ST�` �4 '� #y#yA �' 'v�'' S � .
. ��� ix ��� �����"'"' A x � G v
, n:.. `' ,m?� �.` + .�'t� . .`xp : '
a� � � � � ��� y
A p �, u,, Y' .
� , "'..v'� °��'� ���
^, ����Y P (/ k '''i � q. .
f �'.�*""t r ��"A# . .
h�yyy# Y
� � � Hn j��... .
e=q �� 1
�
Adopt��.� y th��oard of Directors on _/ /
���� >��
� � �����„ e
�, x � �
'°�°°� �
Prepared by Messerli & Kramer, P.A.
525 Park Street, Suite 130
St. Paul, MN 55103
SUMMARY OF 2013 LEGISLATIVE PRIORITIES
I. Promote accountability and transparency in the State/local fiscal relationship
A. Support policies that help promote a more equitable property tax burden as
a percentage of income.
B. Support directing property tax relief to individuals through the circuit
breaker.
C. Support policies that help simplify the property tax system.
D. Oppose reinstating the Market Value Homestead Credit (MVHC) program.
E. Support principles in LGA reform that promote equity, simplicity and
neutrality.
F. Support increased transparency in the State's "Fiscal Disparities" program.
G. Oppose fiscal limitations on local units of government.
II. Invest in job retention and growth
A. Support providing DEED with the tools and incentives necessary to attract
and retain businesses.
B. Support highway and transit projects that promote economic development
and growth.
C. Support flea�ibility in Tax Increment Financing (TI� policies.
D. Improve transparency between effective corporate income tax rate vs. stated
corporate income tax rate to increase the State's competitive advantage in
attracting business.
III. Support local government policies that promote fairness and equity
A. Mitigate the financial impact of surface water regulations.
B. Oppose mandates relating to expenditure-type reporting.
-2-
2013 LEGISLATIVE INITIATIVES
The Municipal Legislative Commission (MLC) has identified the following issue areas as
priorities for the 2013 Legislative Session:
I. Promote accountability and transparency in the State & local fiscal relationship;
IL Invest in job retention and growth; and
III. Support local government policies that promote fairness and equity.
ee �� x,
��
;�,��� �
��� �
� I. Promote Accountability � and Transparency ��e� �� & Local Fiscal Relationship
��, ` x�x n
� ��� �
� A. Support policies that help pro ��more equrt���roperty tax burden as �
a percentage of income �x ���� ���� �
���� � ���.
The Department of Revenue pub � s a report� alled the ��� � �
"Residential Homestead Property�'�'`��urde,r� ," ort," using p �
obtained from the "V�� �atabase " T"� '� se of this report i�:;�
to look at property ta�;���s throughou� state by matching
homeowners' property���s �� ��vith their ���1 incomes
�
,
(includes county, school � city �� tax ��`���ns).
� ��� ���� ���>� °����>.
,
In its 2������pa��ased on �9 da�.'��;� to�`iear from
Eric "��ette on t�r�a> ' � � �` �
� �:s'
� �b�°��x„ ��'p`� ^�� V '"
b° � �-= �
The MLC���s th � slature t`� ��port policies that promote a �
, ���� ����r '
� ,A,, � ��equita�������`� burde� `�r suburban homeowners, as �
� �'�'`�id����;���n the ��s Data�`�` ��or� � �
�£���� i � � ���� p ��, y , !v. ��
'�',
�� ' � �� � ���
"" � � x ��«
ry �� 'ifi �r.'4 �A .
+ � p� j �i
B �n�upport dire�� prop�;at� tax relief to individnals throngh the circuit
�=�eaker
� Th�� �perty ta���refund program ("circuit breaker") provides �
�� �
proper���Gax relt�� individuals based on their income and ability
to pay. �������,�ie circuit breaker was enhanced to help offset the
fiscal imp�i�ons of eliminating the Market Va1ue Homestead
Credit (MVHC), a property tax credit based on home value. Our
communities prefer the "circuit breaker" program because it directs
relief to the individuals who need it most, regardless of where they
live.
MLC requests the Legislature continue utilizing the circuit breaker
program as the preferred system to help reduce the property tax
burden on homeowners.
C. Support policies that help simplify the property tax system.
In 2010, the Legislature established a Property Tax Working
Group to examine the many facets of Minnesota's property tax
system and develop recommendations on how to make the system
more simple, understandable, transparent, accountable and
efficient.
The working group held 20 meetings over the last two years and
established the following guiding principles:
1. defend the purpose of the property tax system;
2. base property taxes on full estimated market value;
3. base property taxes on property attributes, not ownership or occupancy;
4. defend broad-based goals from narrow interests;
5. consider more transparent alternatives;
6. provide sunsets to prompt review;
7. require value or intention statements on new legislation;
8. make simplicity and transparency a priority; and
9. require local impact notes for any property tax changes.
The Property Tax Working Group will report their
recommendations to the Legislature on February 1, 2013. The
MLC supports the guiding principles of the working group, and
requests the Legislature support policies that will help simplify �
(not further complicate) the State's property tax system.
D. Oppose reinstating the Market Value Homestead Credit (MVHC) program
The original MVHC program was a credit funded by the State to
qualifying homeowners. Cities provided the credit to taxpayers
with the expectation of being reimbursed by the State. However,
when the State had a budget deficit, MVHC funding would be cut
to some cities (MLC cities have only received full reimbursement
for the credit twice since the program's implementation).
In 2011, the Legislature eliminated the MVHC program and
replaced it with a homestead market value exclusion. With this
new program, a portion of a home's value is excluded from
taxation (thus it is funded by residential and commercial property
owners within that home's jurisdiction — not the State).
\ -4-
MLC supports the stability to our budgets provided by the
exclusion, not the market value homestead credit. Our members
ask the Legislature to oppose reinstating the MVHC program in
2013.
However, there are areas where a legislative fix is needed in order
to mitigate some of the challenges of going from a credit to an
exclusion, including:
1. Levv limits for EDAs and HRAs
A number of levy restrictions based on market value related to specific
functions, such as economic development authorities, housing and
redevelopment authorities and port authorities, may inadvertently
experience a reduction in their levy authority due to the exclusion. The
MLC requests that levy limits based on market value, including those
impacting economic development authorities, housing and redevelopment
authorities and port authorities, be computed on market value of the
jurisdiction before the homestead market value exclusion.
2. Housin� Districts/TIF Districts
The TIF statute, Minn. Stat. § 469.177, does not address tax base changes
resulting from the homestead market value exclusion. As a result, the
current value of a district will be reduced by the exclusion but the original
net tax capacity will not be adjusted and consequently, increment available
to the district will decline. The MLC requests that Minn. Stat. § 469.177
be revised to provide for an adjustment to the original net tax capacity
calculation to reflect the exclusion.
The technical changes referenced above were addressed in last
year's vetoed Omnibus Tax Bills (Article 7 of H.F. 2337, and
Article 12 of H.F. 247). The MLC encourages lawmakers to
revisit these articles and pass a technical corrections bill to mitigate
these issues.
E. Support principles in LGA reform that promote equity, simplicity and
neutrality
MLC cities do not receive LGA. However, our members support
the program as long as it's clear to our taxpayers where the money
is going and why it is being directed there. We recommend the
following principles be adhered to when changes to LGA are
proposed:
1. Equitable - an effective LGA formula should provide similar amounts of
aid to similarly situated cities (minimize mechanisms such as
"grandfathers" and minimum/maximum aid amounts).
-5-
2. Neutral — the LGA program should not encourage cities to spend more
than it would otherwise need to for basic services. LGA should be based
on factors outside of the individual city's control.
3. Simple and Understandable — attempting to address every unique and
special problem with each of the 855 cities in Minnesota causes the LGA
formula to be too complex. Factors used to determine aid should have
general support and understanding from cities and their citizens.
4. Ability to Provide Adequate Revenue — an effective formula should
grow with general city costs, stay relatively stable, and should be based on
factors for which we have accurate information and whose values do not
wildly fluctuate from year to year.
Furthermore, the MLC supports methods to reduce the property tax
burden that are outside of the LGA program. In addition to the
"circuit breaker," increasing school aids, county aids, or reducing
the Statewide tax on C/I and seasonal properties would all help
relieve the property tax burden on our residents.
F. Support increased transparency in the State's "Fiscal Disparities" program
The State authorized the Department of Revenue to commission a
third-party study of the Metropolitan Area "Fiscal Disparities"
Program. The program was enacted in 1971 to reduce
discrepancies in tax-base wealth between taxing units within the
metro.
At the time of the study's release, one of the common issues raised
amongst our members was the lack of understanding about the
fiscal disparities program within the business community.
Therefore, the MLC recommends that steps are taken to help
improve the transparency of the fiscal disparities program, such as:
• Revising the name of the program to accurately reflect its purpose (which
is redistributing tax base, not sharing revenue); or
• Displaying the metro area-wide tax rate in addition to the local tax rate on
a business's property tax statement.
G. Oppose Fiscal Limitations on Local Units of Government
Our cities' residents and property owners provide nearly all the
revenue for city services through property taxes and fees — no
MLC cities receive LGA. Imposing artificial caps, such as levy
limits and property tax freezes, removes the autonomy needed for
cify officials to make decisions in the best interests of their fellow
citizens.
-6-
The MLC opposes state limitations on local decision making that
inhibit cities' ability to plan with financial confidence. We ask the
Legislature to not impose restrictions to our budget decisions by
imposing levy limits or property t� freezes.
-7-
II. Invest in Job Retention and Growth
Compared to the rest of the nation, Minneapolis-St. Paul and the surrounding suburbs rank at the
top when it comes to the percentage of college educated adults active in the workforce, as well as
the number of Fortune 500 headquarters per capita. We are also one of the few metropolitan
regions in the U.S. that is home to our state's capitol and its major research university. Thus, the
State needs to invest/support regional growth in the Twin Cities metropolitan area and
surrounding suburbs.
MLC cities specifically are critical job producers for the regio� ,�ombined, we are among the
biggest job producing areas in the state with over half a mill��,�mployees (compared to
��
Minneapolis/St. Paul with a combined total of 456,798 e�����ees)�. Furthermore, many of our
cities have seen net employment growth between the ���2� 2010. In fact, five of the top 10 �
cities with net employment�growth of over 1,000 at� �,'� mem�
�; ,,�.
,
Our members believe the State can play a cnt���'�e in keeping and g`��ng Jobs by making
� �x�:
�key investments, and by supporting and partne� �with cities. A jobs foc� uvill help cities
promote a healthy business environment, which v�� �eep an�: jobs her���er than having
� companies move to a more competiti�� state. ;
���� ��
���>,n n �;, �
��
- j �.
`� � ��
� � ����� �
A. Support providing DE�� wi�'�� ai�.�l �centives necessary to attract
and retain �us�nesses ����_ ��'� �
,. j � �
�
�� `� ��� ax �:, ; ' `'
The � supp�� authonz'�� �►�;� to ��� specific tools to
attract��nesses vs�out alw����taving to go�to the Legislature
for approt��� Thes��:include the�'��� of tax incentives in order to
����� ���
,� � n=�a,�r�ct �obs �� ca�r fi� �mmur���s, sales tax exemptions or
u��e�� �n co��.iction �ii���tals �d capital equipment, and
z ' funding ��� �Vlinn���a Investm���'und (MIF). Doing so would
n n= . �
°'�� ���>> not only he� �pedi�+� ��e process, but also reduce barriers to local
�
�ob creation ��
��.
� ,;_>� P
�:��
B. Supp���highw�� �nd transit projects that promote economic development
and gr�� �� ��
� � ��
The MLC ca�inues to support transportation investments to
replace deficient bridges, maintain regional and state highways,
and advance public transit. In addition, our members support the
Transportation Economic Development Program (TED), a
collaboration between DEED and MnDOT which prioritizes and
funds highway capacity and safety improvements which will result
in significant job growth and economic development.
1 The Metropolitan Council, Metro Stats: Employment in the Twin Cities Region, 2000-2010, September 201 l,
< http://stats.metc.state.mn.us/stats/pdf/Employxnent_MS2010.pdfl
During the 2011 Special Session, language was passed creating a
Trunk Highway Economic Development Account (MN Statute
161.04, subd. 6). The Commissioner of Transportation was
authorized to transfer up to $20 million from the Trunk Highway
Fund into this account toward the TED program.
The MLC supports this account and encourages the Legislature to
continue annually allocating MnDOT funds toward the TED
program.
C. Support flexibility in Tax Increment Financing (TIF� policies.
TIF remains one of the most viable tools available to fund
community reinvestment efforts. Further restrictions of TIF
would render the tool less effective and will almost certainly
curtail local efforts to support job creation, housing, redevelopment
and remediation. In light of the recent economic and development
downturns, cities need greater flexibility to use the tool effectively
to support the economic viability of their business and residential
communities. The 2010 Jobs bill provided flexibility in the tax
increment laws, recognizing that this is an important tool for
stimulating development and creating jobs.
So as to not further complicate this process, the MLC requests the
Legislature not enact future TIF law restrictions during the next
legislative session.
D. Improve transparency between effective corporate income tax rate vs. stated
corporate income tax rate to increase the State's competitive advantage in
attracting business.
(For discussion...)
-9-
III. Support Local Government Policies that Promote Fairness and Equity
MLC cities want to partner with the State to provide the best services for its constituents.
However, State mandated programs can interfere with a city's ability to make the best fiscal
decisions for its community. Mandates can lead to either a reduction in basic services or an
increase in taxes and service charges in order to meet the requirements outlined by the State.
The MLC asks the Legislature to thoughtfully consider existing mandates and their efficacy, and
make the appropriate reductions or repeals where possible. We further ask that unfunded
mandates be avoided altogether. Should new mandates on local�inits of government be
proposed, we ask that legislators consider providing cities w�� �� greatest amount of flexibility
available in order to reduce implementation costs. ��� ���
=� '- �� �e .
� ��s.��'' `°` „; � .
A. Mitigate the financial impact of su�fa� water ��ulations
��
� F�� ,1
The MN Pollution Control A��� �distributed a iii� ,to cities
���
regulated under the Municip� e�eparate Storm Sewe�
(MS4) stormwater permit, requi�� an inve��ory of stoi��ater
ponds, wetlands and other water bo���s�,�m��k�`by the collec��aa��
treatment and conve��� y of stormwat�r "�� "impact of a detail�'
pond-by-pond surve� ����aventory cc�u.�+d prove to be very
expensive for cities. ��rt���are, this pr��,ct would create a
significant administrative `�rderi��� #.�e MP�z� �uho already are
�
behind i�. ���sng docui��ts rela�4'� �he st�water permit
����� �.� -
pro �.�� � � , >
��� � � ` � � �
, � ��.�� ���
�° � � � s°; � r
�� `� ������
MLC �orts th��,goal of �nitoring the performance of �
� stormwater ��ds� �`� °�ter qua� ,,purposes, but the economic
,� `��'� this �,� ��ec�s �c���,,�reat�`� �onsidered.
F� � ����� �� :�r n �
.�x �
� �� � .
B,� , y Oppose mat��es rela'�r�,g to expenditure-type reporting
� �;�
�� �� =xxx
�°�OP, the C(��nercial '�eal Estate Development Association
sp`�a��ed legisl�.#�n last year that would require counties and
cities���'��ublish ��eir budgets sorted by "expenditure-type" (i.e.
employ�� �� ��ided by wages, health care, pensions and Social
Security; su����es; purchased services; capital items; and transfers
to other funds). Failing to comply would have resulted in the
withholding of State aids.
The MLC appreciates the intent of more transparency between
local government and taxpayers, but we are concerned with the
additional city resources it would take to compile this information
by object code (as it is not standard practice). A pilot project or
providing past audited financial statements online as an alternative
would help alleviate some of these concerns.
3 ,`�'����� s � � id,
,� � �!�ii�i������ �,i �
� � i� �� �o i ��� rr � ti � , I , � �
a �
����o�r � �, � � � `���m� i I� � w� � � � '� s����'���p�
�'� � .��a �inu �,k __ i � � � li � �_ � , �
�� � =
� �� 4 } �, r � �
� � �� � « �� � � � �i � '�� �
� ��'� � � � �� �� i � i�� � '
ICi jF � 115 '��� � ��II i ihli (� � ( a I ; � I -� i '�� ��I) F i — �� � . ( (; �1 �, � i �l ; �� � � � �
.: ' � 91� , ,� '� � ei� �5� .
_ 1 � _ _ �. ''7 _� .:�— � -�� e�. _� :- = 2� � __ �« ' � � _ ���
� ... _ —.�,._�_ _ .. .°.ft.&. . .. = �.Wi. €C�.ti : ....... � ° -
�'=�,�IiA' Ii�""=���=_
♦ � • = fi.
��.
.L f � G "--- ��'"�
B�fOre F1SCal I�1S arltl�S...
p
In 1969, the Citizens League released a report, "Breaking the Tyranny of the Local
Property Tax." It found:
• Differing property tax burdens for equal services among communities.
• Local governments competing amongst each other to improve their own tax base,
sometimes at the expense of the region.
• Metro cities with little tax base but high levels of children encountering high
property tax rates, yet inadequate revenues for schools.
The Citizens League recommended a limited tax-base sharing program that would
work within the existing government structure.
Purpose of a Tax-base Sharing Program
The 1971 metropolitan tax-base sharing law, or "Fiscal Disparities," was enacted to
reduce discrepancies in tax-base wealth between taxing units within the metra
• Reduces the winner-take-all reward in the metro-area competition for tax base.
• Limits the portion of tax base subject to sharing (only tax base growth after 1971,
and only 40% of C-I growth is subject to sharing).
• Works within the existing government structure.
• Retains the independent autonomy of cities.
. Refrains from creating any new metro taxing authority.
w
�li���:��i ��� i� _ _ �_ r � _ � a ��_ �
m�aNi i i�imihi a�� �� �
r.� s� � i� ��,���" �� �h � ��� „��
� � ��il��� � ���. �� � ��a � 4 � "17'i��Ui `" p ���� il�li y�"4
. (IIi���i �' �`� i� 5 �:. � � i ) A �p �` �� `, ., �-�✓������ : °����� � � �-��,��- -
5
� ili�i ��i���i� ii ` ��� �I�iiil:��7 _ :��, ^�-``� liil'�i��i�i���� i � ;_ �N'��1�lii. .
i�.� ( �ti=� � : � �r�„� _ � ( HI _ � ` d (� ��I' �� > i�� _
�i _ ` ��I�_ �� ,,� b� _- n i i DiIV� ����ii � �- - .�,��;�Sa���� I � I =� '� � � � � a :.�1i i� ( :�
. � � - a �
�i t�P� — =
�� Results of the Program �
The law has reduced differences in C-I tax base per capita across the
metro, and helped make C-I property taxes more uniform.
• In 2012, the city with the highest GI value per capita has three times that of the
lowest-ranked city (a 3-1 ratio). Without sharing, that ratio would be 9-1 today.
• Actual taxes paid per $1,000 of value by C-I property are much closer together
across communities. Thus, a business considering a new location in the seven-
county metro area can know that—for up to 40 percent of its value—its property
taxes will be the same.
.
�Iow lt works...
The Fiscal Disparities program is a"tax-base sharing" program, not a revenue
transfer.
• The seven-county metro and its taxing jurisdictions (cities, counties, school dis-
tricts, special t�ing districts) participate in the program.
• 40 percent of C-I growth since 1971 is pooled and calculated at the "area-wide
tax rate." C-I property includes all businesses, offices, stores, warehouses, fac-
tories, gas stations, parking ramps, and public utility property or vacant land
zone commercial or industriaL
• The distribution of the net tax capacity from the area-wide tax base is deter-
mined by a distribution index based upon relative fiscal capacity.
Average Fiscal Capacity
Population of City/Town x City/Town Fiscal Capacity = Distribution Index
� �`� � ' �
12/13/2012
�
r.
, ,; �
�
City of Apple Valley, Minnesota �����
Solar Energy Options
December 13, 2012
,����
�
Private Taxpavin4 Entitv (A&P) — Investor/Lessee/Service Provider
50% investment
— Investor eligible for tax benefits and depreciation
— Provides Aiternative Energy Services, including operation, repair and maintenance for term
— Leases equipment with 20 year capital lease
Xcel Incentives/State Incentives, Grants
50% investment
- Apply for Renewable Development Fund Grant, Xcel/State Rebates
Citv of Apple Vallev — HosULessor/Customer
— $0 outof pocket initial expense
— Initial investment— planning, legal documents, site information
— Receives alternative energy services, including operation, repair and maintenance for term
— Pay monthly service payments which approximate 5% discount from retail electric costs
— Option to buy-out capitai lease at end of term at fair market value ��
— Energy Savings Guarantee �
1
12/13/2012
� �� �� _
� ��
� ,�
• Length of Term(s)
• Cost of Alternative Energy Services
- Operation
- Repair
- Maintenance
• Capital Lease Payments up front from A& P
• Compensation, Alternative Energy Services Rates
• Purchase Price Valuation
• Ownership, Warranties, Representations
• Limits of Liability, Insurance, Risk of Loss
• Site Access
• Turnkey Installation
,�� �
__ __
� �
.,._ �� F .:_.
Community Visibility
- Real display of energy produced and carbon reduced
Reduced System Cost
- Federal, State and Local incentives utilized by taxable investor help reduce
total cost of alternative energy to the city
- Hedge against future rate increases/variability
Clean Energy Supply
- Receive clean, renewable energy as part of the alternative energy services
- Production monitored and reported
7 year Service Agreement, renewable up to 20 years
- No large up-front investment needed
- Capital Lease buy-out option at end of term for fair market value
- Guaranteed Energy Savings - no net cost to the city! ���
�
2
12/13/2012
Direct Current Altemating Current
Panel Ratina KWh-1a� vear (EsU
Site Location — Roof Mounted
➢ Ice Arena —1442 Hayes 20,500 28,250
➢ Community Center —14603 Hayes 82,100 113,000
➢ Hayes Arena —14595 Hayes 41,000 56,500
➢ Fire Station #3 —14195 Essex 20,500 28,300
➢Total KWh-1StYear Production 226,050
���
Energy Savings
— Annual production"* of Solar Arrays: 226,050 kWh
— Current annual value: 226,050 kWh x local rate =$23,060
PERIOD Calculated Value M Energy Estimafed Payments for P�M� g���9$
Produced Ene�gyfromSchool
Years 7 - 7 Cumulative $�g�,020 $172,340 $8,680
(with assumed 4.0%yearly increase)
Years S- 20 Cumulative [Lease buyout] $q�g 072 $57,480 $418,612
(with assumed 4.0%yearly increase)
rorni.oveRZOrEne ses�,oez szza.eoo $4�°1,�92
..ANT1CiPATED LIFE
"Annual production rating and utilityrate to be validated
Carbon Emission Prevented
Year 1: 222 tons Prevented!
Over 2o years: 4,444 tons Prevented! �
3
12/13/2012
V�� � �� �
5�a6,�e4!8 QZtE�+.2'4ll7 ..
... (GL�41 .. R ... . 5.766 . , S.TGe . t3?d) ... .. f326} '.� 4s92 �
' - tG.t�l - 4 S_9b5 7a.t29 ii25} � fsSrF 'f P-�tlL'-�
.. ..�. . .... k�.�01 Q �I72 ..� 17,9C2 .. 82 . . C�} .. . RfiG
C��S q �',397 � 2�i.2&4 �9i ' fY1) �� t%iifi .
......... ... ...... ... {5.t1�7 V ....... 68fII 7U999� S2J '. db9 �.� � Qtt4 .
. .. . . «4s�} o � s xao � a��ss � � t5o ' > » • � aza �
, �ca�,maza���du�o�f �sa�trF o ieza aa.etff €s�,rna'r �' ta.�aa} f�r�
. .... . . .... t�;�) 7.^a2S . . ST.td6 5745 ' t� tYE� : Q F33 � .
� 4a,d9.51 iSJS 59.7td 9894 � t7s71 . ...Ot3Q ..,�.
.... .,. 43,754p ., T,dA� ... 07.:rt31 � & t3%3 �� `. HJ3 �. p �st � ��
� � ca.ea22 . 6ar5 � zss7s ` a?9a ' azs&� ���R�St ..
.... d3.9J5? � 8,748 8�.O7a �� �,502 .�_ t8.e�9 ' R.t6Z �
' ' ...... . q9,911� . .... BJ�J6 . 9?7ta �� 8,P1N � 25�fi6 �:� 0�63
� f2txN,1) F.&IXi iCi.7S7 �� (39A: � � :!?,T94 ��. O.f3�1
� ....... ... ...... {2t:32) 4305 911,�.... 7983 ..... 39.5�3 . OfT7
. � .�..d'�,Z�a7 � v.e�r � izn��� E.f12 � � �e�,. . azsa`
. . �.... . , .. � �. �.. . tz,aa,) . . s.�tt � � »BSe � a �ssa �� � �t,sra �.. n �si
....... . .. . ... .. ... 42,388? 1C31� 1k0-9S? t.9t3 ..�. b2d8�� b .g9 �� �
.... .. . ... . . . �. t2.a937 t0,�i7U tg4,&37 8.t7& � 1Q.bd2 Q'261
(259-0) 99.04k iG2.67� .. .&,647 .. . 79 F10 .... 4:216
��� Assumotions � vearao
- MnUalProtluetonoiSystem:;58,520kWh�w/�D:S%��.anrwal.degreda4rn
- Meini.&Inswance0adbyA&P��untllaesabuy-out � Intemal�RateOfR@tURI 21.88 y
Sxv�rspaymxrtsappowmatetyever g 95%otc antelectncwsls � � '� � g
— sav,rs e000-accfo� � y�� Te�m wr a�yo,n oPt�a�:o� o� a� a[ yaa� � Net Present Value: $1 959.32 using 8% discounl � C -
— —.. ,� x
v:,. � ..�. <�
� �, V�
. .. �WU � ��: �
• Letter of Intent
• Submit State/Utility applications
• Analysis of existing conditions
— Roof age/Weight capacity
— Interconnection location
— Current electric usage
• Develop Technical Specifications
— Confirm Pricing
— Alternative Energy Services Agreement
— Legal/Accounting analysis
• Develop Public Relations Plan
• Create Material Order/Installation Timeline
�� �
4
12/13/2012
=..N�-3
Zo13 Le islative
g
Po I i c Revi ew
y
�t.� �a
December 13, 2012
Minnesota State Legislature
Convenes
at Noon on
Tuesday,
]anuary 8,
2013
1
12/13/2012
Minnesota State Legislature
Convenes Scheduled to
at Noon on Adjourn No
Tuesday, Later Than
7anuary 8, May 20,
2013 2013
Minnesota State Legislature
Convenes Scheduled to Significant
at Noon on Adjourn No Changes
Tuesday, Later Than this
7anuary 8, May 20, Legislative
2013 2013 Session
2
12/13/2012
Minnesota State Legislature
Governor House Senate
DFL DFL DF�
Control Control Control
Minnesota State Legislature
Governor House Senate
DFL DFL DFL
Control Control Control
First Time in 22 Years
3
12/13/2012
Big Issue
State Budget
• Forecast Released Last Week
FYzo1z-13 (Current Biennium)
• �1.3 Billion Surplus
• Pledged to Repay School Shifts and
Delayed Payments
FYzoi4
• �1.1 Billion Deficit
Also Remember...
Deficit
Projections Do
Not Reflect
Inflation
($1.056 B)
4
12/13/2012
Also Remember.. Deficit
Projections Do
Not Reflect Add.
Deficit School
Projections Do Repayment
Not Reflect ($1.1 6)
Inflation
($1.056 B)
Also Remember... �eficit
Projections Do
Not Reflect Add.
Deficit School
Projections Do Repayments
Not Reflect ($1.1 B)
Inflation
($1.056 B) Projections
Retain State's
$644 M Rainy
Day Fund and
$350 M Cash
low Account
5
12/13/2012
AN D...
Projections
Assume
Federal
��Fiscal Cliff"
Issue is
Successfully
Resolved
Legislative Policy Development
League
of M N
Cities
Metro Municipal
CItIeS Legislative
Commission
6
12/13/2012
Key PoliciesAreas
Budget
Transportation Elections
LGA Reform?
Natural Economic ����,
�
Resources Development • � A , :
Water TIF
Housing , i''' I
State Budget
Local Aids -Year of Reform?
• Local Government Aid?
• MarketValue
Homestead Credit?
• Market Value Exclusion?
�
12/13/2012
Economic Development
Tax Increment Financing
� Job Creation
• Gravel Redevelopment
� Transit (TOD) Districts
Pensions
PERA Police and Fire Changes
Proposed by Working Group
• OverTwoYears (zo14-zo15)
• Employee Rate from g.6%
to io. z%
• Employer Rate from i4.4%
to �6.z%
• Plus Added Restrictions
s
12/13/2012
Upcoming Meetings
M LC
Legislative Breakfast
January 28, 2013 at
7:30 a.m. Eagan
Community Center
LMC
Legislative Conference
March 2013
St. Paul
COUCICI�
Discussion
, � �� � � �� � �� ��� 7
� �����, �� �
������
�� �r �
:� ;� �
� ,
,
�
� �� ����
��. ���
�`� ���
,� � �
9
�� F- 5
12/13/2012
•
Changes to the Budget since
Adoption of Preliminary Budget
�
Changes to the Budget since Adoption
of Preliminary Budget
• Reduction in tax base since preliminary levy adopted
• Levy reduced by $480,000
— Expenditure Reduction to City provided Insurance $112,454
— Reduction to Allowance for uncollectable Taxes $200,000
— Use of reserves for one time items
$167, 546
— Total $480,000
• New Fund Added
— Cable N Capital Projects fund
• Replacement of Cable TV and Presentation Equipment
• Funded by a portion of the Cable franchise fee
•
1
12/13/2012
•
Reductions
• Reduction to City provided Insurance $112,454
• 14 different General Fund program budgets
— Reduction to Allowance for uncollectable taxes,
. $200,000
— Use of reserves for one time items
• Fire Station # 1 parking lot $ 98,700
• Police cars grant dollars rec'd $ 42,000
• Police Department capital outlay $ 26,846
•
•
2
'� . A
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
Dakota County, Minnesota
November 20, 2012
Minutes of the regular meeting of the City Council of Apple Valley, Dakota County, Minnesota,
held November 20, 2012, at 7:00 o'clock p.m., at Apple Valley Municipal Center.
PRESENT: Mayor Hamann-Roland; Councilmembers Bergman, Goodwin, Grendahl, and
Hooppaw.
ABSENT: None.
City staff inembers present were: City Administrator Lawell, City Clerk Gackstetter, City
Attorney Hills, Public Works Director Blomstrom, Associate City Planner Bodmer, Recreation
Superintendent Breuer, Assistant City Administrator Grawe, Human Resources Manager Haas,
Finance Director Hedberg, City Planner Lovelace, City Engineer Manson, Community
Development Director Nordquist, Police Chief Rechtzigel, and Fire Chief Thompson.
Mayor Hamann-Roland called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Everyone took part in the Pledge
of Allegiance to the flag.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
MOTION: of Bergman, seconded by Hooppaw, approving the agenda for tonight's meeting, as
presented. Ayes - 5- Nays - 0.
AUDIENCE
Mayor Hamann-Roland asked if anyone was present to address the Council, at this time, on any
item not on this meeting's agenda. No one requested to speak.
CONSENT AGENDA
Mayor Hamann-Roland asked if the Council or anyone in the audience wished to pull any item
from the consent agenda. Councilmember Grendahl requested an item be moved to the regular
agenda.
MOTION: of Bergman, seconded by Grendahl, moving item 4.I.2 — Kimley-Horn and
Associates, Inc., to Conduct Red Line/Cedar Avenue BRT Market and
Development Standards Study, to the regular agenda, and approving all remaining
items on the consent agenda. Ayes - 5- Nays - 0.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
MOTION: of Bergman, seconded by Grendahl, approving the minutes of the regular meeting
of November 8, 2012, as written. Ayes - 5- Nays - 0.
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
Dakota County, Minnesota
November 20, 2012
Page 2
MOTION: of Bergman, seconded by Grendahl, approving the minutes of the special meeting
of November 13, 2012, as written. Ayes - 5- Nays - 0.
MOTION: of Bergman, seconded by Grendahl, adopting Resolution No. 2012-217 accepting,
with thanks, the donation of $210.00 from William VanderBie and family in
memory of Elizabeth VanderBie, for the beautification of Lebanon Cemetery.
Ayes-S-Nays-0.
MOTION: of Bergman, seconded by Grendahl, approving issuance of a lawful gambling
exempt permit, by the State Gambling Control Board, to Apple Valley American
Legion, Squadron 1776, for use on January 12, 2013, at the Apple Valley American
Legion, 14521 Granada Drive, and waiving any waiting period for State approval.
Ayes - 5 - Nays - 0.
MOTION: of Bergman, seconded by Grendahl, approving issuance of a lawful gambling
exempt permit, by the State Gambling Control Board, to Valley Athletic
Association, for use on February 11, 2013, at Buffalo Wild Wings, 14658 Cedar
Avenue, and waiving any waiting period for State approval. Ayes - 5- Nays - 0.
MOTION: of Bergman, seconded by Grendahl, appointing Planning Commission Chair Tom
Melander to fill the vacancy on the Economic Development Authority (EDA)
Board. Ayes - 5- Nays - 0.
MOTION: of Bergman, seconded by Grendahl, adopting Resolution No. 2012-218 approving
the Public Works Department Policy Manual, Section 1.09 - Driver Feedback
Equipment Policy. Ayes - 5- Nays - 0.
MOTION: of Bergman, seconded by Grendahl, adopting Resolution No. 2012-219 approving
a two-year extension of Cobblestone Lake Senior Complex Addition preliminary
plat. Ayes - 5- Nays - 0.
MOTION: of Bergman, seconded by Grendahl, adopting Resolution No. 2012-220 approving
reauthorizing issuance of a building permit for Cobblestone Lake Senior Complex,
with conditions, as originally listed in Resolution No. 2008-246. Ayes - 5- Nays -
0.
MOTION: of Bergman, seconded by Grendahl, adopting Resolution No. 2012-221 approving �
an Interim Use Permit to allow crushing and temporary storage of concrete material
at Menards-Hanson property, with conditions as recommended by the Planning
Commission. Ayes - 5- Nays - 0.
MOTION: of Bergman, seconded by Grendahl, adopting Resolution No. 2012-222 approving
plans and specifications for AV Project 2012-108, Water Treatment Facility
expansion, and authorizing advertising for receipt of bids, at 10:00 a.m., on January
29, 2013. Ayes - 5- Nays - 0.
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
Dakota County, Minnesota
November 20, 2012
Page 3
MOTION: of Bergman, seconded by Grendahl, approving the contract for AV Project 2012-
131, Well Pumps 6, 11, 13 and High Zone Pump 4 maintenance, with Keys Well
Drilling, in the amount of $87,502.00, and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to
sign the same. Ayes - 5- Nays - 0.
MOTION: of Bergman, seconded by Grendahl, accepting Liquor Store No. 2- Cooler poor
Replacement Project, as complete and authorizing final payment on the contract
with AA Equipment Company, in the amount of $15,916.63. Ayes - 5- Nays - 0.
MOTION: of Bergman, seconded by Grendahl, accepting AV Project 2012-102, 2012 Micro
Surfacing, as complete and authorizing final payment on the contract with Asphalt
Surface Technologies Corporation, in the amount of $52,052.69. Ayes - 5- Nays -
0.
MOTION: of Bergman, seconded by Grendahl, approving hiring the full time employees, as
listed in the Personnel Report dated November 20, 2012. Ayes - 5- Nays - 0.
END OF CONSENT AGENDA
RED LINE/CEDAR AVENUE BRT MARKET STUDY
Councilmember Grendahl questioned the $200,000 grant agreement to study the Cedar Avenue
BRT market and development standards and the density of development. Everything she is seeing
is referencing higher density. She does not believe that is what residents want.
Ms. Bodmer said the HUD Sustainable Communities Regional Planning Grant is available to the
City through its Partnership with Corridors of Opportunity. The study involves four cities and two
counties. Apple Valley will co-lead the study with Dakota County. On June 9, 2011, the City
Council approved the sub-recipient grant with the Metropolitan Council, who is administering the
grant.
Councilmember Grendahl said she thinks the development will occur without government needing
to study it. Considering the current deficit, she has concerns spending this much money on
another Cedar Avenue study.
Discussion was held.
MOTION: of Goodwin, seconded by Hooppaw, approving the Agreement to conduct the Red
Line/Cedar Avenue BRT Market and Development Standards Study, with Kimley-
Horn, and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the same. Ayes - 4- Nays
- 1 (Grendahl).
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
Dakota County, Minnesota
November 20, 2012
Page 4
2013 ON-SALE LIOUOR AND WINE LICENSE RENEWALS
Ms. Gackstetter reviewed her memo regarding renewal applications for On-Sale Intoxicating
Liquor, Club, Wine, and 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor licenses for 2013. City Code requires a public
hearing on all On-Sale liquor renewal applications. She noted receipt of the affidavit of
publication of the hearing notice and stated no comments have been received. The Finance
Department checked Dakota County tax records and confirmed all taxes are paid. The City Clerk
checked the Minnesota Department of Revenue's delinquent taxpayers list and none of the
licensees are listed. She also confirmed with the Minnesota Department of Agriculture that the
licensees are in compliance. The Police Department reviewed its contacts and incident responses
and only had concerns regarding one of the licensees. Therefore, it was requested the public
hearing on Spoon, Inc., d/b/a Spoon be conducted separately. Ms. Gackstetter stated that although
the On-Sale 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor renewal licenses are included in the public hearing this
evening, there will be no action requested for them. Action on a113.2 Percent Malt Liquor licenses
will take place at the December 13, 2012, meeting.
Mayor Hamann-Roland called the public hearing to order at 7:22 p.m. to consider renewal
applications for all On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor, Club, Wine, and 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor licenses
for the year 2013, except for Spoon, Inc., d/b/a Spoon. The Mayor asked for questions or
comments from the Council and the audience. There were none and the hearing was declared
closed at 7:23 p.m.
MOTION: of Bergman, seconded by Goodwin, approving renewal, for 2013, of On-Sale
Intoxicating Liquor, On-Sale Club Intoxicating Liquor, Special License for Sunday
Liquor Sales, and On-Sale Wine licenses, subject to receipt of the necessary fees
and documents, by adopting Resolutions No. 2012-223 for Apple Minnesota, LLC,
d/b/a Applebee's Neighborhood Grill & Bar; No. 2012-224 for Apple Valley Grill,
LLC, d/b/a Wild Bill's Sports Saloon; No. 2012-225 for Blazin Wings, Inc., dIb/a
Buffalo Wild Wings Grill & Bar #28; No. 2012-226 for E1 Azteca Apple, Inc.,
d/b/a El Azteca Mexican Restaurant; No. 2012-227 for El Toro of Apple Valley,
Inc., d/b/a El Toro Mexican Restaurant; No. 2012-228 for GSTL Investment, LLC,
d/b/a Valley Tap House; No. 2012-229 for H.O.C., Inc., d1b/a Rascals-Apple
Valley Bar & Grille; No. 2012-230 for Hiraku Japanese Restaurant, Inc., dlb/a
Kami Japanese Restaurant; No. 2012-231 for Lancer Food Service, Inc., d/b/a
Lancer Food Service; No. 2012-232 for Osaka AV, Inc., dIb/a Osaka Seafood
Steakhouse; No. 2012-233 for Red Robin International, Inc., d/b/a Red Robin
America's Gourmet Burgers & Spirits #631; No. 2012-234 for Rich Management,
Inc., d/b/a Bogart's/Apple Place Bowl; No. 2012-235 for RT Minneapolis
Franchise, LLC, d/b/a Ruby Tuesday; No. 2012-236 for UASanders, LLC, d/b/a
Panino Brothers; No. 2012-237 for Wadsworth Old Chicago, Inc., d/b/a Old
Chicago; No. 2012-238 for Water's Edge Restaurant, LLC, d/b/a Enjoy!; No. 2012-
239 for Apple Valley American Legion, Post 1776; No. 2012-240 for Chipotle
Mexican Grill of Colorado, LLC, d/b/a Chipotle Mexican Grill; No. 2012-241 for
D& D of Minnesota, Inc., d1b/a Famous Dave's BBQ Shack; and No. 2012-242 for
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
Dakota County, Minnesota
November 20, 2012
Page 5
The Noodle Shop, Co. - Colorado, Inc., cUb/a Noodles & Company. Ayes - 5-
Nays - 0.
Ms. Gackstetter then reviewed the information regarding the renewal application for On-Sale
Intoxicating Liquor for Spoon, Inc., d!b/a Spoon. She noted legal counsel for the licensee has
requested a continuance of the public hearing.
Mayor Hamann-Roland called the public hearing to order at 7:25 p.m. to consider the 2013
renewal application for the On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor license and Special License for Sunday
Liquor Sales for Spoon, Inc., d/b/a Spoon. The Mayor asked for questions or comments from the
Council and the audience.
Councilmember Goodwin said he is perplexed that the licensee is opting not to speak this evening.
Councilmember Hooppaw stated he does not want this to drag out past the next meeting and
prefers to have all the discussion at one meeting.
Mayor Hamann-Roland stated the City Council takes this matter seriously.
MOTION: of Hooppaw, seconded by Goodwin, to continue the public hearing on the 2013
renewal application for the On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License and Special
License for Sunday Liquor Sales for Spoon, Inc., d/b/a Spoon to the regular City
Council meeting of December 13, 2012. Ayes - 5- Nays - 0.
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT 15
Mr. Hedberg said the Council is requested to hold a public hearing on a new Tax Increment
Financing (TIF) District. TIF District No. 15, also known as Parkside Village, is located north and
east of 153rd Street and Galaxie Avenue. He described various details of the housing district,
which requires 20% of its units to be occupied by renters whose income does not exceed 50% of
the household median income threshold. He then reviewed the prior Memo of Understanding with
IMH Special Asset NT 176-AVN, the property owner. He also reviewed the Parkside Village
Master Plan, the Tax Increment Financing Plan, the revenue sources and use statement, county and
school input, future actions, and requested actions. He noted that the action this evening creates
the tool, and additional action would be required to use the tooL
Councilmember Bergman asked if the City is intending to create additional TIF housing districts.
Mr. Nordquist responded this is the first and only housing district proposed by the City of Apple
Valley.
Discussion was held.
Councilmember Grendahl said according to her research on the State Auditor's website,
affordability is the driving force of a housing district. She noted Apple Valley already meets its
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY .
Dakota County, Minnesota
November 20, 2012
Page 6
affordable housing requirements. She does not believe this was the Council's vision for this site.
She asked how much assistance the developers would get.
Mr. Hedberg said the TIF note would be for $5,350,000. Based on various assumptions and
depending on the increments generated and the other criteria, it is estimated the developers would
get up to $8,400,000 including interest.
Councilmember Grendahl questioned spending that amount on 60 units. She then commented on
other properties that are in foreclosure.
Mayor Hamann-Roland asked about the taxes.
Mr. Hedberg stated one of the requirements of the Memo of Understanding was that they become
current on their property taxes, which they have done.
Councilmember Grendahl commented on the federal tax code and its potential impact on
apartment buildings.
Councilmember Hooppaw asked if the City is contemplating bond issuance as part of this project.
Mr. Hedberg said na
Councilmember Hooppaw asked what security the City would have if the project did not move
forward.
Mr. Hedberg responded that the security is still being negotiated; however, the City is seeking a
Letter of Credit that would be held until the building is occupied.
Councilmember Goodwin said when the project was first proposed, the apartments were supposed
to be market rate. He asked for clarification regarding the income that would qualify for the
affordable housing units.
Mr. Nordquist stated it is 50% of the median income, or approximately $41,000 or less, based on
family size.
Mr. Tony Patinella, of Titan Development, said the affordable and market rate units will be built
with the same finishes and amenities.
Mayor Hamann-Roland noted the property has a lot of assessments. This tool gives the City an
opportunity to deal with the assessments as well as get a quality development.
Discussion continued.
Mr. Nordquist added the Planning Commission unanimously approved both the land use proposal
and use of Tax Increment Financing assistance for this type of development at this location.
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
Dakota County, Minnesota
November 20, 2012
Page 7
Councilmember Grendahl questioned the amount of the assistance.
Mr. Hedberg said the assistance is the amount needed to address the delinquent and current
assessments on the property.
Councilmember Grendahl said that means the City would be subsidizing all the housing in this
development, not just the affordable housing, and that is something she cannot support.
Councilmember Goodwin stated that the project will not get built without TIF.
Mayor Hamann-Roland called the public hearing to order at 8:25 p.m. to consider amendments to
the Master Development District to include the establishment of Increment Financing District No.
15 — Parkside Village. The Mayor asked for questions or comments from the Council and the
audience. There were none and the hearing was declared closed at 8:26 p.m.
MOTION: of Goodwin, seconded by Hooppaw, adopting Resolution No. 2012-243 approving
amendments to the Master Development Program for Master Development District,
the establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 15, and approving the
Tax Increment Financing Plan therefor.
Councilmember Bergman stated he still has concerns regarding the area to the west. He
wants the City to be judicious in its use of TIF.
Action was taken on the motion. Ayes - 4- Nays - 1(Grendahl).
ORDINANCE AMENDING FEES CONTAINED IN CITY CODE
Mr. Grawe gave the second reading of the proposed amendments to the Fee Schedule Appendix of
Title III of the City Code. Fee adjustments are proposed for the cemetery, City fees and materials,
consultant and engineering services, building inspections and permits, licenses and permits,
subdivision and development fees, and utility fees. The fees would be effective January 1, 2013.
He noted the proposed rates more accurately reflect the City's costs. Some changes were also
recommended as a result of increased fees being charged the City and some were increased
according to the Consumer Price Index and En ing eerin� News-Record indices. No comments
from the public have been received regarding the proposed changes.
MOTION: of Hooppaw, seconded by Goodwin, passing Ordinance No. 937 amending the Fee
Schedule Appendix of Title III, Chapter 35, of the City Code by adjusting certain
fees and charges effective January 1, 2013. Ayes - 5- Nays - 0.
COMMUNICATIONS
Mayor Hamann-Roland welcomed Barry Bernstein who was hired as the Parks and Recreation
Director.
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
Dakota County, Minnesota
November 20, 2012
Page 8
CALENDAR OF UPCOMING EVENTS
MOTION: of Grendahl, seconded by Hooppaw, approving the calendar of upcoming events as
included in the City Clerk's memo dated November 20, 2012, and noting that each
event listed is hereby deemed a Special Meeting of the City Council. Ayes - 5-
Nays - 0.
Mayor Hamann-Roland wished everyone a happy Thanksgiving.
CLAIMS AND BILLS
MOTION: of Grendahl, seconded by Hooppaw, to pay the claims and bills, check register
dated November 15, 2012, in the amount of $617,206.38. Ayes - 5- Nays - 0.
CLOSE MEETING, LABOR NEGOTIATIONS
Ms. Hills reviewed exceptions to the open meeting law and advised the Council that it could hold a
closed session, under the provisions of M.S. 13D.03, to discuss labor negotiations.
MOTION: of Goodwin, seconded by Bergman, to enter into a closed meeting and convene in
closed session to discuss LELS and AFSCME union labor negotiations. Ayes - 5-
Nays - 0.
The Council convened in the Regent Conference Room at 8:37 p.m. In attendance were Mayor
Hamann-Roland; Councilmembers Bergman, Goodwin, Grendahl, and Hooppaw; City Administrator
Lawell; City Clerk Gackstetter; Human Resources Manager Haas; Public Works Director Blomstrom
and Police Chief Rechtzigel. The meeting was tape recorded as required by law. The Council
reconvened in open session at 9:11 p.m.
MOTION: of Hooppaw, seconded Goodwin, to adjourn. Ayes - 5- Nays - 0.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:12 o'clock p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
OI.C�?i4�
Pamela J. Ga stetter, City Clerk
Approved by the Apple Valley City Council on
f!• �
fiY! �.
�Y # Y�Y�
{r•
City of App�e
Va��ey MEMO
City Clerk's Office
TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator
FROM: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk
DATE: December 10, 2012
SUBJECT: 2013 CITY COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULE
In accordance with current policy, following is the tentative schedule of regular City Council
meetings for the year 2013. Typically, regular meetings begin at 7:00 p.m. and informal
meetings begin at 5:30 p.m. prior to the first regular meeting of each month. To accommodate
the National League of Cities Conferences and meetings, the following changes have been
made: the first meeting in January was moved to Tuesday, the first meeting in March was
canceled, and the first meeting in November was moved to the first Thursday.
5:30 p.m. 7:00 p.m.
Informal Meetinqs R_eqular Meetinqs
Jan "` Jan 8 Tuesday/No Informal
24 24 Informal Mtg.
Feb 14 Feb 14
28
Mar * Mar * Canceled
28
Apr 11 Apr 11
25
May 9 May 9
23
June 13 June 13
27
July 11 July 11
25
Aug 8 Aug 8
22
Sept 12 Sept 12
26
Oct 10 Oct 10
24
Nov 7 Nov 7 1st Thursday
26 Tuesday
Dec 12 Dec 12
26
Meeting Date Criteria Per Adopted Policy.•
1. Agenda preparation meetings will be held on Mondays preceding regular Council meetings unless
it is a holiday or the meeting is on Tuesday. If the Council meeting is on a Tuesday, the agenda
preparation meeting will be held on the preceding Friday.
2. Regular Council meefings will be held on the second and fourth Thursdays unless that or the
following Friday is a holiday; in which case, the Council will meet on Tuesday of that week.
��� �. G
....
,....
aa: t—S
City of App�e
Va��ey MEMO
City Clerk's Office
TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator
FROM: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk
DATE: December 10, 2012
SUBJECT: APPLICATIONS FOR LAWFUL GAMBLING EXEMPT PERMIT — LG220
Post 1776 American Legion Riders
Exempt permits to conduct lawful gambling activities, on five or fewer days in a ealendar year,
for qualified nonprofit organizations, are issued by the State Gambling Control Board. Issuance
is subject to approval or denial by the city in which the gambling activity is to be conducted.
These permits are issued for limited fund raisers or raffles.
The following applications have been submitted for Council approval:
Post 1776 American Legion Riders far events to be held at the Apple Valley American
Legion, Post 1776, 14521 Granada Drive, on:
January 19, 2013
February 16, 2013
September 28, 2013
October 19, 2013
November 30, 2013
The applications are on file should you wish to review them. Please feel free to contact me if you
have any questions.
Recommended Action:
Motions approving issuance of a lawful gambling exempt permit, by the State Gambling Control
Board, to Post 1776 American Legion Riders, for use on January 19, 2013, February 16, 2013,
September 28, 2013, October 19, 2013, and November 30, 2013, at the Apple Valley American
Legion, 14521 Granada Drive, and waiving any waiting period for State approval.
:kjh
... y D
.�.,
....�
.��. � � �
ssm
City of App�e
Va��ey MEMO
City Clerk's Office
TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator
FROM: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk
DATE: December 10, 2012
SUBJECT: APPLICATION FOR LAWFUL GAMBLING EXEMPT PERMITS — LG220
Apple Valley Sons of the American Legion, Squadron 1776
Exempt permits to conduct lawful gambling activities, on five or fewer days in a calendar year,
for qualified nonprofit organizations, are issued by the State Gambling Control Board. Issuance
is subject to approval or denial by the city in which the gambling activity is to be conducted.
These permits are issued for limited fund raisers or raffles.
The following application has been submitted for Council approval:
Apple Valley Sons of the American Legion, Squadron 1776, for an event to be held at Apple
Valley American Legion, Post 1776, 14521 Granada Drive, on:
February 9, 2013
April 13, 2013
July 4, 2013
The application is on file should you wish to review it. Please feel free to contact me if you have
any questions.
Recommended Action:
Motion approving issuance of a lawful gambling exempt permit, by the State Gambling Control
Board, to Apple Valley Sons of the American Legion, Squadron 1776, for use on February 9,
2013, April 13, 2013, and July 4, 2013, at the Apple Valley American Legion, 14521 Granada
Drive, and waiving any waiting period for State approval.
:kjh
... y . E
,...
::::•
,.. .
City of App�e
Va��ey MEMO
City Clerk's Office
TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator
FROM: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk
DATE: December 10, 2012
SUBJECT: APPLICATION FOR LAWFUL GAMBLING EXEMPT PERMIT — LG220
Special Olympics Minnesota
Exempt permits to conduct lawful gambling activities, on five or fewer days in a calendar year,
for qualified nonprofit organizations, are issued by the State Gambling Control Board. Issuance
is subject to approval or denial by the city in which the gambling activity is to be conducted.
These permits are issued for limited fund raisers or raffles.
The following application has been submitted for Council approval:
Special Olympics Minnesota, for an event to be held at Rascal's, 7721 147th Street W.,
on January 12, 2013.
The application is on file should you wish to review it. Please feel free to contact me if you have
any questions.
Recommended Action:
Motion approving issuance of a lawful gambling exempt permit, by the State Gambling Control
Board, to Special Olympics Minnesota, for use on January 12, 2013, at Rascal's, 7721 147th
Street W., and waiving any waiting period for State approval.
:kjh
f#f ! . �
i!i•
tYf`•
i!#•
•8i
City of App�e
Va��ey MEMO
City Clerk's Office
TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator
FROM: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk
DATE: December 10, 2012
SUBJECT: APPLICATION TO CONDUCT OFF-SITE GAMBLING — LG230
Apple Valley Hockey Association
Permits to conduct lawful off-site gambling activities, for four or fewer events in a calendar year,
not to exceed 3 days per event, for qualified nonprofit organizations, are issued by the State
Gambling Control Board. Issuance is subject to approval or denial by the city in which the
gambling activity is to be conducted. These permits are issued for limited fund raisers or raffles.
The following application has been submitted for Council approvaL•
Apple Valley Hockey Association for an event to be held at Apple Valley High School
on January 12, 2413.
The application is on file should you wish to review it and can be approved by resolution. Please
feel free to contact me if you have any questions.
Recommended Action:
Motion approving the issuance of an off-site gambling permit, by the State Gambling Control
Board, to Apple Val�ey Hockey Association, for an event to be held at Apple Valley Senior High
School, 14452 Hayes Road, on January 12, 2013.
:kjh
:::. — T . C� . 1
.....
....
...�
City of ApPVaIley
MEMO
City Clerk's Office
TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator
FROM: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk
DATE: December 10, 2012
SUBJECT: NEW 2013 FUEL DISPENSING FACILITY PERMIT
PRG Market, LLC, d/b/a Andy's Market
An application for a new Fuel Dispensing Facility Permit has been received from:
PRG Market, LLC, d/b/a Andy's Market, located at 14113 Galaxie Avenue.
The Fire Department has completed the necessary inspection. The license would be effective
January 1,2013, through December 31, 2013. The application is in order and may be approved
by the City Council.
Recommended Action:
Motion to approve issuance of a new 2013 Fuel Dispensing Facility Permit to PRG Market, LLC,
d/b/a Andy's Market, at 14113 Galaxie Avenue.
�PJg
\
�
i
/
!!• � ` � • �" �
!ii!
•iifF•
•III#•
•,i•
City of AppValley
MEMO
City Clerk's Office
TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator
FROM: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk
DATE: December 10, 2012
SUBJECT: NEW 2013 OFF-SALE 3.2 PERCENT MALT LIQUOR LICENSE
PRG Market, LLC, d/b/a Andy's Market
An application for a new Off-Sale 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor License has been received from:
PRG Market, LLC, d/b/a Andy's Market, at 14113 Galaxie Avenue.
The Police Department has completed the necessary background investigation and finds no
reason the license cannot be authorized. All of the necessary paperwork has been received. The
license would be effective January 1, 2013, through December 31, 2013. The application is in
order and may be approved by the City Council.
Recommended Action:
Motion to approve issuance of a new 2013 Off-Sale 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor License to PRG
Market, LLC, d/b/a Andy's Market, located at 14113 Galaxie Avenue.
�PJ g
... ,� � 3
....
::.:•
.....
City of App�e
Va��ey MEMO
City Clerk's Office
TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator
FROM: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk
DATE: December 10, 2012
SUBJECT: NEW 2013 LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO
PRG Market, LLC d/b/a Andy's Market
An application for a new License to Sell Tobacco or Tobacco Products has been received from:
PRG Market, LLC d/b/a Andy's Market, located at 14113 Gal�ie Avenue
The Police Department has completed the necessary background investigation and finds no
reason the license cannot be authorized. The license would be effective from January 1, 2013, to
December 31, 2013. The application is in order and may be approved by the City Council.
Recommended Action:
Motion to approve issuance of a new 2013 License to Sell Tobacco or Tobacco Products to PRG
Market, LLC d/b/a Andy's Market, at 14113 Galaxie Avenue.
:PJg
4• i �� �
•aCi�l•
•r�•
•y•°
City of AppVaIleV
MEMO
City Clerk's Office
TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator
FROM: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk
DATE: December 10, 2012
SUBJECT: AMEND PRECIOUS METAL DEALER LICENSE
Bill Buttweiler, LLC, d/b/a AV Diamonds and Gold
City Code Section § 117.06 requires the City Council approve changes in ownership and control
of Precious Metal Dealer Licenses. Bill Buttweiler, LLC, dJb/a AV Diamonds and Gold, located
at 14810 Granada Avenue, has requested the following amendments to its Precious Metal Dealer
License:
• Change of the business name from AV Diamonds and Gold to Apple Valley Diamonds.
• Change in owners. The business is currently owned by three individuals. One of the
owners is leaving the business. The amendment is to remove the name of one of the
owners of record.
Recommended Action:
Motion amending the Precious Metal Dealer License held by Bill Buttweiler, LLC, at 14810
Granada Avenue, by changing the business name to Apple Valley Diamonds and removing
Ronald Paul Baughman as an owner of record.
�P.lg
...
— T.�
...«
.....
....
...•
City of App�e
Va��ey MEMO
City Clerk's Office
TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator
FROM: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk
DATE: December 10, 2012
SUBJECT: RENEWAL OF 3.2 PERCENT MALT LIQUOR LICENSES FOR 2013
Applications for 2013 renewal of 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor Licenses have been received from the
licensees listed on the attached page.
The Police Department has reviewed its records with respect to the licensees, and indicates there are
no issues which would preclude renewing the licenses. The Finance Department has confirmed
these businesses are current with their property taxes. None of the licensees are on the delinquent
taxpayers list provided by the Minnesota Department of Revenue as posted on the Alcohol and
Gambling Enforcement Division's website. In addition, the Minnesota Department of Health and
the Minnesota Department of Agriculture confirms the licensees are in compliance and in good
standing.
As required by City Ordinance, the City Council held a public hearing on the renewal of On-Sale
3.2 Percent Malt Liquor licenses on November 20, 2012. No comments were received.
The applications may be approved by the Council subject to receipt of the necessary documents and
remaining fees which are due by December 15, 2012.
Recommended Action:
Motion approving renewal and issuance of On-Sale and Off-Sale 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor
Licenses for 2013 to licensees per the attached list, subject to receipt of the necessary documents.
�pJg
Attachment
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
3.2 MALT LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWALS FOR 2013
On-Sale 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor:
1. Chipotle Mexican Grill of Colorado, LLC, d/b/a Chipotle Mexican Grill, 7638 150th Street W.
2. D& D of Minnesota, Inc., d/b/a Famous Dave's BBQ Shack, 7593 147th Street W.
3. Taste of Thaiyai, Inc., d/b/a Taste of Thaiyai, 7705 147th Street W.
4. The Noodle Shop, Co. - Colorado, Inc., d/b/a Noodles & Company, 14879 Florence Trail
Off-Sale 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor:
1. Cedar Brook Market, Inc., d/b/a Cedar Book Market, 12503 Germane Avenue
2. Dana Marathon, LLC, d/b/a Dana Marathon, 14050 Pilot Knob Road
3. Durango Market, Inc., d/b/a Durango Market, 6670 150th Street W., Suite 102
4. Emperor Twyst, Inc., d/b/a Gardenview Shell, 206 County Road 42
5. Kwik Trip, Inc., dJb/a Kwik Trip #397, 15065 Dodd Boulevard
6. Kwik Trip, Inc., d/b/a Kwik Trip #406, 7575 145th Street W.
7. Kwik Trip, Inc., d/b/a Kwik Trip #421, 14941 Florence Trail
8. Kwik Trip, Inc., d/b/a Kwik Trip #695, 13357 Palomino Drive
9. Northern Tier Retail, LLC, d/b/a SuperAmerica #4342, 15020 Garrett Avenue
10. PDQ Food Stores, Inc., d/b/a PDQ Store #291, 14265 Essex Avenue
11. RBF, LLC of Wisconsin, d/b/a Rainbow Foods #8828, 15125 Cedar Avenue
12. Sam's West, Inc., d/b/a Sam's Club #4736, 14940 Florence Trail
13. Supervalu, Inc., d/b/a Cub Foods, 15350 Cedar Avenue
14. Target Corporation d/b/a Target Store T-0643, 15150 Cedar Avenue
15. Target Corporation d/b/a Target Store T-2390, 15560 Pilot Knob Road
16. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., d/b/a Walmart #2642, 7835 150th Street W.
�k . S
4#•
•illi
•i!i•
•iif•
•i1•
city of App�e �
Va��ey MEMO
City Clerk's Office
TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator
FROM: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk
DATE: December 10, 2012
SUBJECT: RENEWAL OF LICENSES AND PERMITS FOR 2013
Completed applications for renewal of various licenses and permits for 2013 have been received
and are shown on the attached list. They are issued on an annual basis, to terminate
December 31, 2013. When renewal applications are submitted before their expiration, the
businesses are authorized to continue to operate until they are either renewed or denied.
The following applications have been reviewed and are in order to be approved by the Council:
16 Coin-Operated Device Licenses
25 Fuel Dispensing Facility Permits
2 Precious Metal Dealer Licenses
10 Refuse Collection Licenses
They are available should anyone wish to review them.
Recommended Action:
Motion to approve renewal and issuance of licenses and permits for 2013 as listed in the
attachment to the City Clerk's memo.
: sam
Attachment
2013 RENEWAL LICENSES AND PERMITS
City Council Meeting
December 13, 2012
Coin-Operated Devices
1. American Amusement Arcades at Old Chicago, 14998 Glazier Avenue
2. American Amusement Arcades at Rascal's-Apple Valley Bar & Grille, 7721 147th Street W.
3. Aspen Video and Vending at Wild Bill's Sports Saloon, 15020 Glazier Avenue
4. Awe Vending & Amusements, Inc., at Apple Valley Community Center, 14603 Hayes Road
5. Awe Vending & Amusements, Inc., at Hayes Park Arena, 14595 Hayes Road
6. Bros. Music & Games, Inc., d/b/a Midwest Coin Concepts at Apple Valley American Legion, Post
1776, 14521 Granada Drive
7. Carmike Cinemas, Inc., at Carmike 15, 15630 Cedar Avenue
8. Dean Superior Vending Co. at Panino Brothers, 7083 153rd Street W., Suite 1
9. Dennis Boldt at Granada Laundry, 14835 Granada Drive
10. Mendota Valley Amusement, Inc., at Bogart's/Apple Place Bowl, 14917 Garrett Avenue
1 l. Mendota Valley Amusement, Inc., at Buffalo Wild Wings Grill & Bar, 14658 Cedar Avenue
12. Mendota Valley Amusement, Inc., at Red Robin, 15560 Cedar Avenue
13. National Entertainment Network, LLC, at Cub Foods #155930, 15350 Cedar Avenue
14. National Entertainment Network, LLC, at Denny's #7793, 7805 150th Street W.
15. National Entertainment Network, LLC, at Rainbow #8828, 15125 Cedar Avenue
16. Theisen Vending, Inc., at Carmike 15, 15630 Cedar Avenue
Fuel Dispensin� Facilities
l. AVR, Inc., d/b/a AVR, 15497 Pilot Knob Road
2. Cedar Brook Market, Inc., d/b/a Cedar Brook Market, 12503 Germane Avenue
3. City of Apple Valley d/b/a City of Apple Valley Central Maintenance Facility, 6442 140th Street W.
4. City of Apple Valley d/b/a Valleywood Golf Course, 4851 McAndrews Road
5. Dana Marathon, LLC, d/b/a Dana Marathon, 14050 Pilot Knob Road
6. Dick's Valley Service, Inc., d/b/a Dick's Valley Service, 6781 146th Street W.
7. Emperor Twyst, Inc., d/b/a Gardenview Marathon, 213 County Road 42
8. Emperor Twyst, Inc., d/b/a Gardenview Shell, 206 County Road 42
9. Holiday Stationstores, Inc., d/b/a Holiday Stationstore #316, 5980 149th Street W.
10. Independent School District #196, 14445 Diamond Path W.
11. Joel Watrud d/b/a Apple Valley Golf Course, 8661 140th Street W.
12. Kath Fuel Oil Service Co. d/b/a Gas/Plus 19, 15550 Cedar Avenue
13. Kwik Trip, Inc., d/b/a Kwik Trip #397, 15065 Dodd Boulevard
14. Kwik Trip, Inc., d/b/a Kwik Trip #406, 7575 145th Street W.
15. Kwik Trip, Inc., d/b/a Kwik Trip #421, 14941 Florence Trail
16. Kwik Trip, Inc., d/b/a Kwik Trip #695, 13357 Palomino Drive
17. Lampert Yards, Inc., d/b/a Lampert Lumber, 14555 Galaxie Avenue
18. Maplewood Amoco, Inc., d/b/a Apple Valley BP, 7510 147th Street W.
19. Minnesota Zoological Garden, 13000 Zoo Boulevard
20. Northern Tier Retail, LLC, d/b/a SuperAmerica #4342, 15020 Garrett Avenue
21. PDQ Food Stores, Inc., d/b/a PDQ Store #291, 14265 Essex Avenue
22. Paradise Partners, LLC, d/b/a Paradise Car Wash, 7600 145th Street W.
23. Paul's Rental & Sales, Inc., d/b/a Apple Valley Rental, 7661 146th Street W.
24. Paul's South Cedar Service, Inc., d/b/a Paul's Cedar Avenue Tire & Auto, 7525 147th Street W.
25. River Country Cooperative. d/b/a River Country Co-op/Marathon, 15050 Galaxie Avenue
Precious Metal Dealers
1. Bill Buttweiler, LLC, dlb/a Apple Valley Diamonds, 14810 Granada Avenue
2. Jay F. Jeweler, Inc., d/b/a Jay F. Jeweler, 15050 Cedar Avenue S., Suite 104
Refuse Collection
1. Aspen Waste Systems, Inc., d/b/a Aspen Waste Systems, 2951 Weeks Avenue S.E., Minneapolis
2. The Buckingham Companies d/b/a Buckingham Disposal, 5980 Credit River Road S.E., Prior Lake
3. Dick's Sanitation Service, Inc./Lakeville Sanitary Service, Inc., d/b/a DSULSI, 8984 215th Street,
Lakeville
4. GarbageMan Apple Valley II, LLC, d/b/a GarbageMan of Apple Valley, 929 Hague Avenue,
St. Paul
5. Nitti Sanitation, Inc., d/b/a Nitti Sanitation, 1725 Meadow View Road, Eagan
6. Randy's Sanitation, Inc., d/b/a Randy's Environmental Services, 4351 US Hwy 12 S.E., Delano
7. Republic Services, Inc., d/b/a Allied Waste Services of the Twin Cities, 4325 E. 66th Street,
Inver Grove Heights
8. Troje's Trash Pickup, Inc., d/b/a Troje's Trash Pickup, 6010 Concord Boulevard,
Inver Grove Heights
9. Veolia ES Vasko Solid Waste Midwest, LLC, d/b/a Veolia Environmental Services,
309 Como Avenue, St. Paul
10. Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc., d/b/a Waste Management, 1901 Ames Drive, Burnsville
2
wa•
•4r•
•w�we
s�w• �.
•��
City of AppVa��ey
MEMO
Finance Department
TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator
` FROM: Cathy Broughten, Assistant Finance Director ( J �
\
DATE: December 7, 2012
SUBJECT: 2012 Special Assessment Roll No. 615
Attached please find the documents for the 201 Z Special Assessment Roll No. 615 for a public improvement
project. This assessment is for the Eagle Ridge Business Park public improvement project 2011141. The final
payments have been made on the contracts and the benefited properties are now being assessed.
A public hearing is not necessary since an agreement was signed by the property owners, Patina Apple Valley
Land LLC on December 8, 201 l, to waive their right to object to or appeal the assessments. They also further
waived the notice of hearing on the assessments.
The total assessment is $435,254. The balance will be submitted to Dakota County to be levied on the 2013
property tax statements.
Recommended Action
Staff requests the City Council to approve the adoption and levying of the 2012 Special Assessment Roll No. 615
to Dakota County.
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY, DAKOTA COUNTY
MINNESOTA, HELD ON DECEMBER 13, 2012
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Apple Va11ey, Dakota County, Minnesota, was held at the Municipal Center in said municipality on
the 13th day of December, 2012, at 8:00 o'clock p.m.
The following members were present:
and the following were absent:
Member introduced Resolution No. 2012-xxx and moved its adoption:
* � * * * * * * * * * *
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
RESOLUTION NO. 2012-
WHEREAS, the property owners, Patina Apple Valley Land LLC, signed a Waiver to
Objection to Special Assessments agreement on December 8, 2011.
BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Apple Valley, Dakota
County, Minnesota, as follows:
1. The Assistant Finance Director has calculated the amount proper and necessary to
be specially assessed for improvements in the areas described, as set forth in E�ibit A,
against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land affected thereby upon the basis of
benefits without regard to cash valuation in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota
Statutes Annotated, Section 429.
2. This Council, finds each of the lots, pieces and parcels of land enumerated in the
proposed assessment rolls, in the aggregate amount of $435,254, was and is specially
benefited by an increase in the market value of the properties by the construction of said
improvement is not less than the amount of assessment set opposite the description of each
lot, piece and parcel of land, respectively, and that such amount so set out is hereby levied
against each of the respective lots, pieces and parcels of land described in E�ibit B.
3. The proposed assessment rolls are hereby adopted and confirmed as the proper
special assessments for each of said lots. Each assessment, together with interest at the rates
set forth in Exhibit A, accruing on the full amount thereof, from time to time unpaid, shall
be a lien concurrent with one (1) year's interest on that and other unpaid installments to be
payable with the general taxes for each consecutive year thereafter until the entire
assessment is paid.
4. The Assistant Finance Director sha11, as soon as may be, prepare and transmit to the
County Auditor, a Special Assessment Input form as may be prescribed by the County
Auditor, to be extended upon the proper t� lists of the County and the County Auditor shall
thereafter collect said assessments in the manner provided by law.
ADOPTED this 13th day of December, 2012.
Mary Hamann-Roland, Mayor
ATTEST:
Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk
* � * � * * * * * � � *
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by Member
xxx upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in fa�or:
and the following voted against the same:
Whereupon said Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted on the 13th day of
December, 2012.
2
Exhibit A
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
RESOLUTION NUMBER 2012-
The assessments against each piece of property will be payable, in equal, consecutive
annual installments as hereinafter specified. The first of said installments will be payable with the
general taxes collectible during the year 2013. Interest sha11 be added at the per annum rate
specified on the entire assessment from the date of the resolution levying the assessment until
December 31, 2013. Each subsequent installment will be payable with one year's interest at said
rates on a11 unpaid installments.
Ro11615 — Fifteen ( 15) Installments at 5.00%
Sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer systems, streets, sidewalks, a public street lighting system
and a storm water retention pond totaling $435,254 for EAGLE RIDGE BUSINESS PARK.
PID#01-22445-00-010 totals $406,904 and PID#01-22445-01-010 totals $28,350.
The area proposed to be assessed is every lot, piece and parcel of land benefited by said
connection based upon the benefits received and agreement with the Landowner.
DATED this 13th day of December, 2012.
Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk
City of Apple Valley
7100 147th Street West
Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124
Exhibit B
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
Resolution No. 2012-
Table of Contents
Adopted
Attached Asmt Bond Total Council 12/13/12
Project Business Page Roll Fund As of Changes Certified to Amounts
Number Unit Number Number Number 12/13/2012 If An Auditor Pre aid Net
Individual Rolls 7
Eagle Ridge Business Park 2011141 4502 2-3 615 4500 435,254 - 435,254 - 435,254
TOTAL DETAIL 435,254 - 435,254 - 435,254
Page 1
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
ASSESSMENT ROLL
Date: 12/13/12 Project Name: Eagle Ridge Business Park
Asmt Roll No.: 615 Project Number. 2011141
01-22445-Od-010 01-22445-01-010 Total
A. Contract Award Date 4/26/2012 4/26/2012
B. Assessment Date 12/13/2012 12/13/2012
C. Number of Days (A to B) 231 231
D. Interest Rate 3A 3A
E. Acreage N/A N/A
F. CONSTRUCT{ON CONTRACT
1. Utilities/Streets/Lighting 382,552 - 382,552
2. Laterals - ' -
3. City-Water Utility 25,299 - 25,299
4. TOTAL 407,851 - 407,851
G. OVERHEAD
1. Utilities/Streets/Lighting 73,577 - 73,577
2. Latera{s - - '
3. City-Sanitary SwdWater 4,865 - 4,865
4. Subtotal 78,442 - 78,442
5. Less Designer Fees Deposited (28,000) - (28,000)
6. Less Plans & Specs Fees Paid (1,125) - (1,125)
7. TOTAL 49,317 - 49,317
H. PROJECT TOTAL COSTS 457,168 - 457,168
I. LESS F(3) AND G(3) (30,164) - (30,164)
J. TOTAL ASSESSABLE COSTS 427,004 - 427,004
K. INTEREST 8,220 - 8,220
L. DAKOTA COUNTY ASMT CHARGE 30 - 30
M. SAN Trunks Note 1 Note 1 Note 1
N. WAT Trunks Note 1 Note 1 Note 1
O. STM Trunks - Multiple/Commcl Note 1 Note 1 Note 1
P. AMT EXCEEDING ASMT CAP (28,350) 28,350 -
Q. ASSESSMENT TOTAL 406,904 28,350 435,254
R. No. of Lots/Parcels 1 1
S. PER LOT/PARCEL $ 406,904 $ 28,350
T. ASSESSMENT TERM
1. 5 Years $ - $ ' $ -
2. 15 Years 406,904 28,350 435,254
4. ASSESSMENT TOTAL $ 406,904 $ 28,350 $ 435,254
Note 1- Not applicable for this project.
Page 2
COMPANY 4500 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
PROJECT INCOME STATEMENT
FILE NUMBER :
ASSESSMENT NUMBER :
BUSINESS UNIT: 2011141
PROJECT NUMBER :
PROJECT NAME : EAGLE RIDGE BUSINESS PARK (LIFEWORKS)
DATE : 12/31/2012 Total
Through
2009 2010 2011 2012 12/31/2012
A. REVENUES
1. Interest Earned $0.00
2. Sale of Bonds 0.00
3. State of Minnesota 0.00
4. Road Escrow 0.00
5. Developer Escrow 59,500.00 (43,700.00) 15,800.00
6. Designer Fees Paid 28,000.00 28,000.00
7. Plans & Specs Fees Paid 1,125.00 1,125.00
8. From (To) Other Programs 0.00
9. TOTAL 0.00 0.00 59,500.00 (14,575.00) 44,925.00
B. EXPENDITURES
1. Engineering 334.00 46,234.47 46,568.47
2. Bond Issue Costs 0.00
3. Miscellaneous Costs 36.00 1,441.15 1,477.15
4. Legal Fees 10,786.81 1,438.18 12,224.99
5. Administrative Fee 18,171.23 18,171.23
6. Construction Contract 407,851.58 407,851.58
7. Easement Costs 0.00
8. Contingency 0.00
9. Bury Power Lines 0.00
10. 0.00
11. TOTAL 0.00 0.00 11,156.81 475,136.61 486,293.42
C. NET INCREASE (DECREASE) 0.00 0.00 48,343.19 (489,711.61) (441,368.42)
D. ADJUSTMENTS
1. Dec (Inc) Acc't Receiv. 0.00
2. Inc (Dec) Acc't Payable 0.00
3. Inc (Dec) Con't Payable 0.00
E. BEGINNING CASH 0.00 0.00 0.00 48,343.19
F. ENDING CASH $0.00 $0.00 $48,343.19 ($ 441, 368. 4 2 ) ($441,368.42)
12/10/2012 Page 3
:::. �. L
.....
....
City of App�e
Valley MEMO
Public Works Department
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator
FROM: Colin G. Manson, City Engineer
DATE: December 13, 2012
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION REALLOCATING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ASSOCIATED
WITH COBBLESTONE LAKE COMMERCIAL 4TH ADDITION
With the recent subdivision associated with the Pizza Ranch development, levied assessments
associated with the land must be re-apportioned over the newly created lots. Staff has worked
with the developer to establish the reallocation of all existing levied assessments on the property.
The following tables summarize the existing assessment balances and proposed reallocation for
the parcels formerly identified as PID # 01-18058-00-030 (Outlot C, Block 1) and 01-1805-01-
O50 (Lot 5, Block 1):
Existing Assessment Balances
City Project # 06-331 00-128 OS-311 03-237
Assessment Roll # 564 569 579 580
Outlot C, Block 1 $4,044.60 $2,213.20 $17,501.00 $5,006.44
� Bal. as of 10/22/2012 �
Lot 5, Block 1 $3,086.60 $1,685.88 $13,334.88 $3,813.28
Bal. as of 10/22/2012
Proposed Assessment Reallocation
City Project # 06-331 00-128 OS-311 03-237
Assessment Roll # 564 569 579 580
Lot 1, Block 1 $4,414.69 $2,413.79 $19,089.48 $5,460.00
Lot 2, Block 1 $2,716.51 $1,485.29 $11,746.40 $3,359.72
Redistribution of the assessment value will not have an impact on the total value of payments for
the assessments.
Recommended Action:
Adopt Resolution Approving Proposed Assessment Reallocation for Property Subdivided as Part
of Cobblestone Lake Commercial4th Addition — Assessment Rolls No. 564, 569, 579, and 580.
CGM:jcb
Attachments
c: Todd Blomstrom
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
RESOLUTION NO. 2012 -
A RESOLUTION REALLOCATING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
IN THE COBBLESTONE LAKE COMMERCIAL 4TH ADDITION
WHEREAS, the City of Apple Valley levied special assessments against certain property
in the Cobblestone Lake Commercial Addition development area formerly identified as PID# O1-
18058-00-030 (Outlot C, Block 1) and PID# 01-18058-01-050 (Lot 5, Block 1) (the "Property")
for the following Projects:
City Project No. 00-128, County Road 31 Storm Sewer,
City Project No. 03-237, 153rd Street Construction,
City Project No. OS-31 l, Cobblestone Lake Streets and Trunk Utilities, and
City Project No. 06-331, Southeast Trunk Water Main;
WHEREAS, the initial amounts of the special assessments levied against the Property
were as follows:
City Project # 06-331 00-128 OS-311 03-237
Assessment Roll # 564 569 579 580
Outlot C, Block 1 $6,067.00 $3,018.00 $23,865.00 $6,827.00
Lot 5, Block 1 $4,630.00 $2,299.00 $18,184.00 $5,200.00
WHEREAS, after the special assessments were levied, the Property was re-platted as
Cobblestone Lake Commercial4th Addition; and
WHEREAS, Dakota County requested that the City of Apple Valley reallocate the unpaid
balances, including principal and accrued interest, of the special assessments among PID# Ol-
18071-01-010 (Lot 1, Block 1 Cobblestone Lake Commercial4th Addition) and PID# O1-18071-
O 1-020 (Lot 2, Block 1 Cobblestone Lake Commercial4th Addition); and
WHEREAS, the current unpaid balances, including principal and accrued interest, of the
special assessments levied against the Property are as follows:
City Project # 06-331 00-128 OS-311 03-237
Assessment Roll # 564 569 579 580
Outlot C, Block 1 $4,044.60 $2,213.20 $17,501.00 $5,006.44
Bal. as of 10/22/2012
Lot 5, Block 1 $3,086.60 $1,685.88 $13,334.88 $3,813.28
Bal. as of 10/22/2012
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Apple
Valley, Dakota County, Minnesota, that the unpaid balances, including principal and accrued
interest, of the special assessments levied against the Property shall be reallocated among PID#
O 1-18071-01-O 10 (Lot 1, Block 1 Cobblestone Lake Commercial4th Addition) and PID# O 1-
18071-01-020 (Lot 2, Block 1 Cobblestone Lake Commercial4th Addition), on the basis of
square footage, as follows:
City Project # 06-331 00-128 OS-311 03-237
Assessment Roll # 564 569 579 580
Lot 1, Block 1 $4,414.69 $2,413.79 $19,089.48 $5,460.00
Lot 2, Block 1 $2,716.51 $1,485.29 $11,746.40 $3,359.72
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the unpaid balances, including principal and
accrued interest, of the special assessments shall be levied as reallocated herein.
ADOPTED this 13th day of December, 2012.
Mary Hamann-Roland, Mayor
ATTEST:
Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk
%�• ITEM NO.: �—}, �
•��s•
•��•
•�• .
CITY OF Apple
Valley MEMO
Planning and Development Department
TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator
FROM: Thomas J. Lovelace, City Planner
DATE: December 10, 2012
SUBJECT: CDBG Reprogramining Request for Glazier Townhomes Rehabilitation Project
CASE NO.: PC10-44-M
For your consideration is a draft resolution approving a request for the reprograming of
$115,000.00 in Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds that will be matched by
the Dakota County Community Development Agency (CDA) that will be used do rehab the
CDA's Glazier Townhomes. This 15-unit townhome development, which is located at 14631-
14659 Glazier Avenue, has been in operation for 30 years.
The funds that would be used for this rehab project would come from the City's $309,412.20 in
allocated CDBG funds, of which $136,912.20 need to be spent by May 1, 2013 in order to meet
the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) timeliness requirement. This
requirement has been established to ensure that allocated funds spent in a timely manner as
established by HUD.
To meet the HUD requirement, the CDA has proposed that the following CDBG funds be re-
programmed:
•$72,838.76 in the Manufactured Home Replacement Program 2007 allocation.
•$25,225.29 remaining in the 2010 Residential Rehabilitation Program allocation.
•$11,252.31 of 2011's Residential Rehabilitation Program $91,375.00 allocation.
The reprogramming of these funds would not have an impact on the funding of programs that are
currently offered to Apple Valley residents. Interest in the Manufactured Home Replacement
Program has waned and there has been no activity over the last few years. The Residential
Rehabilitation Program has been very successfully; however, because of current staffing it would
be difficult for CDA to process enough loans before May 1, 2013 that meet the timeliness
requirement. Also, it is expected that staff will be proposing that the City's fiscal year 2013
CDBG funding request include additional funding for this program. Therefore, the reallocation
of funds from this program should have no impact on any current loans or funding applications.
Attached is a memorandum from the CDA that explains their rehab proposal as well as before
and after pictures of a similar townhome project that was recently rehabbed by the CDA.
Staff Recommendation: Adopt the draft resolution approving the reprogramming of
$115,000.00 of Community Development Block Grant funding to be used as a match for the
rehabilitation of the Glazier Townhomes, located at 14631-14659 Glazier Avenue.
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
RESOLUTION NO. 2012-
APPROVAL OF THE REPROGRAMMING OF CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
CDBG FUNDS FOR THE GLAZIER TOWNHOMES REHABILITATION
PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City of Apple Valley is a participating jurisdiction with the
Dakota County CDBG Entitlement Program; and
WHEREAS, the Dakota County CDA is a Subgrantee of Dakota County for the
administration of the CDBG Program; and
WHEREAS, the Dakota County CDA has requested a reprograming of THE
City's unallocated CDBG funds from fiscal years 2007, 2010, and 2011 in the amount of
$115,000.00; and
WHEREAS, the re-programmed funds will represent a fifty per cent match that
will be used to assist the Dakota County CDA with the rehabilitation of the Glazier
Townhomes located at 14631-14659 Glazier Avenue.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Apple Valley hereby approves the reprogramming of $115,000.00 in unallocated CDBG
funds from fiscal years from 2007, 2010, and 2011 that will be used as a fifty per cent
match for the Glazier Townhomes rehabilitation project.
ADOPTED this 13 day of December, 2012.
Mary Hamann-Roland, Mayor
ATTEST:
Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk
�
r , , o �.�� �
� ��
t3akota Cotan#y
Cor�mcantty D�veiopm�nt
���Y
� ��
MEMORANDUM
To: Bruce Nordquist, Community Development Director, City of Ap,ple Valley
Tom Lovelace, City Planner, City of Apple Valley
From: Andrea Brennan and Lisa Henning, Dakota County CDA
RE: Proposed Re-Programming of CDBG Funds to Assist CDA Public Housing
Modernization Project
Date: November 28, 2012
CDA Public Housinq Proqram Summarv
The Dakota County Community Development Agency (CDA) owns and manages 323 units of
housing as part of its Scattered Site Public Housing Program. Outside of one 80-unit apartment
building, the CDA's public housing portfolio consists of a mix of single family homes,
townhomes, duplexes and fourplexes scattered throughout Dakota County. The CDA first
received public housing funding from HUD in 1977 and has been recognized as a high
performer by HUD for the past decade. The CDA's Property Management Department is
responsible for daily operations and management of the Agency's public housing units. The
CDA's Facilities Contract Manager directly oversees the implementation of the Public Housing
Capital Fund and is the lead coordinator for all unit improvements. The CDA has an estimated
$5 million worth of project improvement needs for its 323 public housing units. HUD's overall
funding reductions have resulted in a 25% decrease in Capital Funds allocation for 2012
compared to the allotment the CDA received in 2008.
Proposed Fundinq for Glazier Townhomes in Apple Vallev
The CDA requests City CDBG funds to improve Glazier Townhomes, a 15-unit public housing
townhome development located at 14631-14659 Glazier Avenue in Apple Valley. Built and
placed into service in 1982-1983, this property is now 30 years old. The CDA plans to use
CDBG funds to address roof deficiencies, health and safety concerns and improve the energy
efficiency of the units, as well as improve the general exterior appearance of this project, which
is highly visible from Cedar Avenue.
Proposed Scope of Work
The scope of improvements include:
• New architectural shingle roof, gutters, gutter covers
• New fiber cement board siding and trim
• New insulated overhead garage doors with accent windows
• Improved exterior lighting (attached to the structures)
• The addition of concrete pads for N dish reception to reduce the disarrayed
appearance of dishes
• Landscape improvements near rear patio doors
Glazier Townhomes is comprised of 15 units in three buildings. The current roof has standard
three tab asphalt shingles, which were last replaced in 1999 and are at the end of their effective
life cycle. The CDA proposes to replace the current shingles with an architectural shingle that
is a heavier laminated fiberglass asphalt shingle. Architectural shingles are constructed not only
to have a longer lifespan over three tab shingles, but are more wind-resistant and perForm
better, making them not as likely to warp.
The CDA also intends to install continuous flashing the entire length of the roof that will
reduce or eliminate the current deficient step flashing design that has allowed water to advance
into the units The step flashing continues beneath the siding at each roof-side wall juncture. To
effectively replace the step flashing and install the new flashing, the CDA will be removing the
steel siding and replacing it with fiber cement board siding.
Additional exterior improvements include replacing the exterior lighting at the entry door,
garage parking stall and back patio entrance. Existing high pressure sodium wall pack light
fixtures provide inadequate lighting for residents and have an institutional look. The CDA will
replace the current lighting with energy efficient LED fixtures, adding more light to the areas
surrounding the townhomes for added security.
To complete the external improvements the CDA will replace the existing overhead garage
doors with insulated garage doors. The door design includes windows that provide a more
modern look and more importantly provide natural light into the garage stalls.
The CDA recently completed the same scope of improvements to its public housing
development in Burnsville. Attached are before and after photographs of this rehabilitation
work.
Estimated Proiect Budaet
The project is estimated to cost $230,000.
The CDA requests the City of Apple Valley re-program its 2007 Unallocated CDBG funds in the
amount of $72,838.76, 2010 homeowner rehabilitation funds in the amount of $30,9087.93 and
2011 homeowner rehabilitation funds in the amount of $11,252.31 (totaling $42,161.24 of
homeowner rehabilitation funds) for a total of 115 000 to assist with this project. The CDA will
provide matching funds to ensure completion of the project and will make every effort to spend
down the City's contribution to the project on or before May 1, 2013 to meet the timeliness ratio
of 1.5.
Estimated Proiect Timeline
In order to meet the May 1, 2013 deadline for expenditures of city CDBG funds, the CDA would
need to begin bidding this work out immediately. The work will take approximately 16 weeks to
complete after contracts are signed. A contractor would need to be engaged by early January,
so we would need to begin the public bidding process in early December. The timing is tight,
but can be done if all parties are properly motivated.
j � � �,
� .
f
�y� r= � � `
r �� E
� Y �� � °t z I, � ',
� �� R� ��� � � � ° � 1 ';
,��� ;_ `� ;� `� �
s� n�� � � �,� � ? ,
=��
�r �° '� s}'� �' � F� ,�^ �, F��'F� . ' � I
� .;�s�',��` r�a ` s ^t �� <�
� �� ���£��� i � ��s � �� � �'' ,
r � r�-'�+' x .r '�'�� !
u "K r
�'� `�, �� ��� ✓�� � � � I
�` �"��°,��- �a z"� .� r' � ., �r s 3r .
"� �"� s � � � :.tr ,.. �� � a � , � ( I � i
_ ��'�" =:r "`4 � � : ,�� � z ; � ���r � ,�`�-.= 1 � � .�
�' ��.�'��. � �� t "'„ � �"�-y. �p� ` I I � �
���� � �3���� �� ' a ���� ���� I
<
.. � '� �.a< €��* .� , x£ �,a�„,� � : `' T, y"� �`s :
�'",-�� �",�� ' x � t � `? � ,���f 3. a' I ' .
� �'�� � ��t� � � `n`, '�" t y � �
.�- ».r n '+ � � F�`
����e��+" �` 1 n: �.� ° '^� � 4�`� y� :L` , �� � � �' ,
�'������� ` �- # ��ar����s�
�f` dt.�. *3 � .r'�,a n `'cw ..
, �� "�o- '` � : '�vr'-�, z, �- �, . d' `� Y- a � � �.
� '..f��'�� ..� � ,h . �� � F r �
s �a � `�� '✓ r`'Er �� n ?t .: �'
ro� �� �'� ,�`�� i� n�� � � ���
��,' � �s-, � 3 i
�. '' rn � r: �
� ���� � �`��' � � �' ,�� { �
d ����� � ��,`t, s �.��¢�. �, = r s��< � �� '�s�
��f,. � �� � � ,� s ; �� �,;°' r' .
� ��z � �
������ � �� , � ��:
�`,� � . r�� - 2c � `° ,� �� � � , `; � r:
�.. 7 x:, tfi' s ,t �
, ._ ,�r €:�" � ,�`� �- �� � ��„7 �, �rf�' � r
�' ��� ���� ��� c ��,� i������� � .
� � .� � � '� � q . �� �€ � i , � ' ,
� ny, s: �:�� a, 2 � �'�` g� 1 �,
� � �� � �
�.
„T � � T '
��` `"�` ��"��`"x��`�°r �'r �X ��'T� !� �� ��� � 4
d3 ��sr �5 �� �.'� '�} t£ �'
^�'�� y�^;� `:t..� `� .'� .: ' ', '
� � �� � �"+�"� r � r x ^�' �`�` ti �$`� � t t . .
� � �s r �-��`.
�'.�'„ �g�i�`,�`� �" � �� �. � � '° � .
� � `�^��� � : � ��� s� ���i���:
������ � �� � �� ��;
� � � �� ��� �� �� $ � � . r ��
��� � �� � � � ; �
r �� s�- `r,��-� ' tF - ,�' d �t _
'� a -z �' �� �' � $' "� � . ° ti,
� �, .� - ����r�,"�*,� .fu '�';n� . � u � � - �s �+� . ��f � Lr.�a� `� a [
� .,� -�� � �z t� � � C �.. �.
Y S �- 1 v'
a€�� ix�'� �-�` r i �. �� i`�'
Y� , �S, R Y,� ,! t•i
�.. �»t�.�'� �'s � -�.�t � ;, ��,�'+t �.
���� °� �'` ���� � � x �: � f � '�'� ��
� Y � �^°' E }� '$ k ��� , 7 � f��
"`�� � ,� �;„�`,� �: l� .,, � s y 3 r,s�'�3 r p �.
� �
, „ , f�� �. � t �'�t: � t� ��
r �
�
�!- ; _ . � f L � �. �- - � � ya: .. .. .
s °» � � F
n Bf � �� � ,.
#�
�- . � � �#���� .
� �
�
�'�� f t �" �.
� � �
� � � , .�
� �� �,.
,
� �
�° � � �
�.
..
� � ��,. � � �'� �, �.
� �: �
a � �. �� ��� � a � � � � �' `�
' "�,'�.§"�;�- � � � , k, �,. �-� � �` k"�."� � v�'� ,�-`� �Y€ ,
r �
� ... �� �� .: : ��' '. .. - x� �` .. `
s
;�3a� .. ...x,,.,,..:?3'-�,�.�.,�.....,";�' " ` .. ,..s .. a;.�:::, a� i� ��� 'r'.... .. �.,=��:�.,.�..,.�,. ..«�;s'��'.'��_
�"�� �.
� '�� � � r
xw �
�
. �`'��` `� x.: �,�...
"��� �"`� ;,
��-� ����
�����
�� � � �
�"���'�"� `a
��� �� � x 4
,��
,�y � � }'
� ��� ��� .
��-°. �'��`� ,
r . .� v :: „
���
. Y�K� : .� ..�,..
.-: t ,
;�
��
y "
� ��
� �
A r .�. a�..���
,-n.w+k.�' _�..v
+
£
� T �'
��`� ; � �' �... ,
Y,�, {�.;,y " .: .
�`' � t- �',.,` ,?;
� ,
— - � 4 � ,� �.� �''�� „ ' �� ry
� � �.,
, � '
"�,. ��:�
�. ku r
M:, �
ff�
� �
r t � �� � � �� k�:'
� t �•
{ ������ � M1, ����. � n
.�i..�• � . ): �, � � �.�1 3 ; t� �y� T �� � ;
i � " '`#', �`w. ��� g�,
- r �;� r �- , .
l � �
� ,
, �.�, � �
;_ , , � , � ,.
< :, i .i, �
- ��,
1 , -
7 � ' ,�
a � ��_v�—._..,
j _
, t I �.
' j
�� I ��:�
��� + �! � � � �� �� ���
1 �a�` � � �: �
"�,� ;,
�::
��;�
r=
�
���
�s�'� �
s°
_,�,�,... ¢ _
����, ��� :��,
���� � �
,. . .�,��.�.,�:�^.�'�. .. � . ��' . .
. ; ,
-�
m. s �
�. ,
k ,
�a ; �
, ,. .,.. .. ��G � �.-.
- t
>,��
.
� . � �. � „
,,� . x � �
, ... . ,. , .
. -,
, . � .� ra.. r ��°��
�, . , �.„ ., . <. . <
� " �� .�.,�
� ..... �� . ,, �,� • ,,� � �
� y ,.4.�. .
i , �� "
" � Y i,
W r� � F i�,,i � �
�. � � �' �
I, �, .
1 ' i ' �I�
�
�_
��
� ';
,�
� �� f �
�' � � , . , _ , .,.
„ /J j ' _: . ' .. . _. ... �.'.. .. .: '
�. .� '�'"� �,* �� ` � r �����,'�'`� � �� iv C'�
.✓.�-'- ., � �' �
' :=� ,��� ���&�"•,�C����� �3 `�� � ��``e��; s��
� .-;� �� _ �
� f �/��J � � � °�� �,��� � � ������� � , , �
.�i-f� '��/� ' ���M1'�" �?� �'c� k � `" , $ by
u�°
r-- ' � � � � � ` a� "� z�
.�
�
t fii" , �r.�» � 4.` 4'7� s�
� .�zrs �,a r� ��`�` �.s� k � { a'� a�t - � t) ��m�. `'-t �„�fa,
'� �� '"'c FM F' W i � '� � Y ha " r '�1 � y ''� � � p�� iFp . �� � � } ,
� d� ���t�f ,�3 4 Z X�{'��s$�.� 6 �„ �h i�,s,��'.`��" F nf S �� � V
� `° "�kH h_'N' *� !�,"'�^ "" s� ` J" :
.��`�� � `d`f � # . 1M i N^� ������.�����2� :, .� �'���.� +� '
� �, , ��; � z E 5 �- �' ce`�� (� � k �'�
���� ���� ����ro����� � � �. �� � ��� � �
,F a �s k �q;, .� , p .�� s��'�'�." \ � , �,�,. � �
M'av �` b���.rc�'Gy"�Y � uT'"t5^ ���5' x� .��� Yy,� d .a.� �.
� .��a;�� ����� `� ��",� a ,�.�+ t� � ,� �` � � x
� �� ���,e� � y�,,'�=u r� �� �, ' � �r � 3 � ^� �r�` 3�� � � � � � ��
.} r„�� `.^� . �p� ,"�.+k' 4 �� ` a r z '�,� b '�
� � �� k,v�'.� : � ��,�'�a,�' .� ;� 1"���"` �s,�n b a x «-y'
�4 T �� s 5� a ^. S 4 ).
� ������ � �� �� . ta ��.��� d� � i� � .
W U�t �
. a 3� r ak� w�'s"a? �����'�`�.� ��, c�'� �K�x�� t� ��: �.���� � ., � �.
` f m = #P
, , ,,. � . � �� �
�a5 � t � ' �k�'3
�ttrY k r
� ; & �������� �, ��a�
a' �b ? p '`�.:, ��� ..� t,�`.� :�� ,�`r"��� "�r� � 1� .
" x i
,� � �t� �+���"� �? .�" �,+ "�'� .� �,
� � �`�a �"` � ` a a' s �� � �@ '� � � �w� � � �' � ��,' s w� � a „ ��
`� a � � * t� �� `� � z�� �
� . , �: � 3t a � «, F % �ce .,.�e� r+�� '
���[ , ,, ,,�� °+�" � � .. .. t� r ��.�� "��..}��r'��a � �., � '��` �a� x �`�.� �
°:. ' ���„s�i,.� .;,._- � .�..,_s.a�� . ' . �. . . a. ��� ��a�. .�.� ����. � ��,..�.��a'� �' s�'..c��""� �. ,tv _.� ..,f�a���.:.�.«.�'���
. ... , . . . . . .. . �. '� �u , ,�, ,�. r ,,. u�.
� � � : � ��,� �� ., .. z .
t _.
* {§.,: .
� �.
� m
t ���. �
Ty�
n.. . �,
H
,�. , _ . .. a_ .,
�,
3 �
� � �
�
�`�.. � .
� �� ��° � � �„ �°
� 6, � � ��
I M1. - 4 . � '( �, , �g '. � y i� h , :� " �
l .` � J�q �. �y�` � .� ;� a� ¢ L:
I
� � 7 y i 0. � t � � � ?' �
� ! �` T �C �,,, "+. . � �
d �� . '�'� i a�' "�€ � t i �� $ :z.� � . s
� � t ' `� � ;� � �� a" y s
- s � } � �i � �, ;Yt pa'�t ; � � s �. � k '
j� t �ek^r�, ' �, ` s � � � k,� � � .� 1 ,� ���:; .
� �s
n,� � d2 �*': 1� k y m�' '�i�t � '
,��` ,� a �� 4 ' `�r . � �
. ti .� . �� . -_
�s � � . « � :u� rG '�� ��. .
�
x � a �±
r , , : .,. �. .
. .� , . . „ ; � . ,., : , ., y
. fi
��
� � � �� �
� � � �� dx '
n� . ' '� - . . : _ .� �t� �� � �� ���. �� �
� .,. �' . , .. .. � t �.� �
, �. ; . ; . .. _ ';' � #�t��.
, , d ,., . �, � . , '� , S � � �._ �
� �4 t�
. :. . .s ... " �^' , 4
2 �`
,.�: r�,.�:+ r ^+�. :Y""u;� a 4'S � a 3
n �' , .�, .� " �
�..� . � `'. , � ; : x s��. `� � �,'�
. ' . . � ��� �� �� �:, s .. � ` ��" � ��h x `�� �'�i� � ��'� a�k � �-�� �:
> � � �r
s
� � �: „ � � x
t � � s � "� �3 �'�� �`��' ah���?� '���.�.� � s ^,
.,� � ,� � ,� �� � r � - � � ,� ; 4 �,�'�.� �1� �� ; g � ,
` �,2 s �. ��- �,� S "" 3 �` � .,�, ��'��a ax �`�' �� ` a ��� � "�k �-� :s� E I'� ��
� �... �fta: ��� �' �'� f��'ts�',�' �.��. � �',� � > �' x : :�,�av '�
. ��� 3 �t.�:: g � ! ��y � ,� �.� �,.� ` � � M1 �, i� -�, ti. �ti � ..
�.> � _ t 4 � ��; �, � � f� �'� �3��� "��, � ��`�''���� ti �,..+ �����.,s ��k„�,a ,��a «
. � r �',� #�Y,� ^i� ��+r� a �' sx:; n���'s w�^� � �a� `""i'�u4t� :`.�� ���� f } ���a�r.r ,�..��. � #'�a
� � ?� -, k i� �� � k 's� - l '� F �.: u� b � i � �' �
� � ^� � � +�� �x�"� � � +m� .� ���+ , ���� a�,��.� �` ��,'��m �;<
� t �,+ fi� - L .+., � s � d� ^`� r�t � .l'�F�;
r � x
yt a4 �
�' � � ;,.,, :, � ; .,,, ` -
'. �.. . . , ; . ` ':. � r,. . ` "� ,.��,� � ��'1 s� '� :. „� ,�,' r °' �;d t s. `"�x. 4 .�k'� e a � �' � . r �' � ��� a� d :�'y� � z�',i�r�� � ...�,
',= :� . � � s;� �� '' �s c,t�� k� k�'�;,.�,-`�`�` �`"w� � .;� a �- '„'„`,"§ 3 � � ���"�,hr�"' ` �> _,p,�:+t'�.,
. . , ' ; , . , ., � � s
`�� ,.,�� ... q � � ��.�'a :� �e*� � ", � i °�#�.. Y`"�`4 4 �:n' "��m ��'� "���` �a� 4 r �� ����'� r �
�� ��� ; t x ` ; � � �? ,, � t��� �'�� " �s t � d s � � �k :,s �*�
,
. . ,�. . �..�: ' =� ,, ,;',' ,: � •. � ,.. ,:...� :: . ., , :i .'` ,._ �� � . ��s..�:,;� . ? � v wa�s�".+��.��";". ,...r...w . ��t..�� ���..�. x� 1at.�r: "�:>�..��r.,...; c .,,,.,e'� '�?,�:�i '.. �.�°e���;
�
, .r a� ��: 'r
���
�.N
.�.�
.�.��
.���
���.
City of App�e
Valley MEMO
Administration
TO: Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Tom Lawell, City Administr�
DATE: December 7, 2012
SUBJECT: Extension of Liquor Store #1 Lease
DISCUSSION
The City Council is requested to approve an extension of our lease currently in place between
the City and Time Square Shopping Center.
This renewal would be for a three-year term commencing February 1, 2013 at a monthly base
rent of $10,500. This monthly rent would stay constant for the duration of the three year
extension. The renewal also provides for the opporiunity to extend the lease for an additional
three-year term should the City wish to do so in the future.
With the Cedar Avenue construction project nearly complete, this retail location should
continue to be a desirable and highly visible location for Liquor Store #1.
RECOMMENDATION
The attached lease was prepared by the City Attorney's office and is recommended for
approval.
ACTION REQUIRED
Council should consider a motion to approve the attached Lease Extension for Liquor Store #1
at Time Square Shopping Center, and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the lease on
behalf of the City.
LEASE EXTENSION
This Agreement is entered into effective this day of December 2012 by and between ;
Time Square 5hopping Center II, LLP, a Minnesota limited liability partnership, ("Landlord") }
and the City of Apple Valley, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("Tenant"). r
;
WITNESSETH
�
WHEREAS, Apple Valley Shopping Center, a Minnesota partnership, and Tenant entered into a
Lease dated September 7, 1989, (the "Lease") for premises commonly known as 7525 West
148 Street, Apple Valley, Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, Apple Valiey Shopping Center's interest in the Lease has been assigned to
Landlord;and � ;
VV�-IEREAS, Tenant and Landlord or Landlord's predecessors in title entered into various �
amendments and extensions, including that certain Lease Extension on January 2$, 2010, which ;'
e�ended the Lease for three (3) years commencing February l, 2010, and ending January 31, '
�
2013; and r
�
WHEREAS, the parties desire to enter into this Agreement to further extend the Lease for three
(3) more years commencing February 1, 2013, and ending January 31, 2016;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual obligations of the parties under this
Agreement and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are
hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:
1) Extension. T'he Lease is hereby extended for an additional term of three (3) years
commencing February 1, 2013, and ending January 31, 2016. .;
2) Base Rent. The Base Rent during this extended term shall be Ten Thousand, Five
Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($10,500.00) per month.
5
3) Renewal O t� ion. Provided that Tenant is not in default of the provisions of the Lease and
further provided that Tenant gives Landlord written notice of its intent to exercise its
renewal option as set forth herein, Tenant shall have the right to extend the Lease for an
additional term of three (3) years. To exercise the renewal option, Tenant shall give
written notice to Landlord on or before November 1, 2015. In the event the Tenant
exercises the renewal option, the Minimum Base Rent for the three (3) year term
commencing February 1, 2016, and ending January 31, 2019, shall be increased to Eleven
Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($11,000.00) per month.
;
i
3
!
I:
�(
i.
[
�
�
4) Other Terms Remain Unchanged. Except as set forth in this Agreement, all other terms
and conditions set forth in the Lease, as previously amended and extended, shall remain �
unchanged.
€
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first �
above written.
�.
Time Square Shopping Center II, LLP, �''
a Minnesota limited liability partnership
,; �
,- ;
���� I I G�-�C. , By L , �.
f
�
W ess Robert Levine, Managing Partner !
�
c
t
�
i,
Ciry of Apple Valley, �
a Minnesota municipal corporation
By
Witness Mary Hamann-Roland
Its: Mayor
�
i
�
(
;
BY P
Witness Pamela J. Gackstetter %
�
Its: City Clerk `
Y
�
F
e
E
[
t
tI
I'
I.
4
�
k
2 E
�
!
i
�
.�. '{".�
....
.....
....
.s..
. City of AppVa��e
y MEMO
Community Development
TO: Mayor, City Council Members and City Administrator
FROM: Joan Murphy, Community Development Department Assistant
DATE: December 13, 2012
SUBJECT: Financial Guarantee Obligations
The City holds numerous financial guarantees to ensure the installation of certain improvements in
new developments, as well as to assure protection of natural resources. Staff review of the status of
this development indicates that the following actions are in order:
1. Apple Valley Business Campus LOC #IS0013814
(PC11-28-5) Original Deposit on 7/27/12 $922,230.00
Reduce now to $19,400.00
2. Eagle Ridge Business Park LOC #5798701135
(PC11-23-SB) Original Deposit on 1/3/12 $51,700.00
Reduce now to $7,500.00
3. Eagle Ridge Business Park Cash Check No. 47
Subdivision Buffer Guarantee Original Deposit on 12/14/11 $8,000.00
(PC11-23-SB) Reduce now to $0.00
"' ITEM NO: L.} P
::::• .
...
CITY OF a�Valley
MEMO
Community Development Department
TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, and City Administrator
FROM: Thomas Lovelace, City Planner
DATE: December 10, 2012
SUBJECT: Fina1 Plat and Subdivision Agreement for CUB FOODS ADDITION
FILE NO.: PC12-24-5
Attached for your consideration are the draft final plat and subdivision agreement for the CUB
FOODS ADDITION. This plat, which is generally located at the southeast corner of 153 Street
West and Cedar Avenue, consists of three (3) lots and zero (0) outlots. This is a replat of an
existing 11.63-acre lot that is currently occupied by the Cub Foods grocery store and surface
parking lot.
The newly created Lot 1, which will have an area of 9.52 acres, will be the location of the existing
Cub Foods grocery store. Lots 2 and 3, both having a lot area of approximately one acre, will be
used for future commerciaUretail development. City approval has been granted for a 7,000 sq. ft.
multi-tenant retail building on Lot 1 and the Planning Commission is currently reviewing a request
for a proposed Chick-fil-A restaurant on Lot 2. SVH Realty, Inc. is the current owner of the
property and is expected to retain ownership of Lot 1, with Lots 2 and 3 being sold for future
development.
A public hearing on the subdivision of the land by preliminary plat was held by the Planning
Commission on August 1, 2012, and was recommended for approval by the Commission at its
September 5, 2012, meeting. On October 25, 2012, the City Council approved the preliminary
plat for the CUB FOODS ADDITION.
The draft subdivision agreement refers to the maintenance of the existing municipal streets and
utilities as well owner installed private improvements and required financial guarantees for all of
the developer-installed items and landscaping. The agreement also calls out the immediate
installation of all subdivision monuments and documentation of additional agreements These
include an access restriction easement restricting direct access to 153 Street West from Lots 2 and
3, utility easement and maintenance agreement, cross access and parking agreement, and proof of
parking agreement.
Staff Recommendation: Adopt the draft resolution approving the CUB FOODS ADDITION
final plat and subdivision agreement, and that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to
sign the final plat mylars, development agreement, access restriction easement and proof of
parking agreements.
c1 � ��"�I �,� �,�t ' �,�' � � _ �?-���,� � f'� ; �
��� .. y »� �� �,� ;3� °I�Iil � +
� � � � � � i �� 'S:�'�� f � i .�
� � :� . � �f � ..�
_
� � �: _.. �
,�
�� � � '� r��' I I
� � � �
� � �� � � ,�.�' ���� � .��, �
� °� ► •� � a
� �. � � � _ , �� �
���; � ' "
�` �
� �..
�
i '� �� .��
�. « � a,
� . �
:.� � � � .
� k
f � E ��� � � ���� � ,.
� � 5
...� ♦ fi / 1 " � � h� � ��� `�, \ .
� � � `���
� � . � � � ��
� � � , .�k t, � �, , � � �
� � i i � � ��� � &
� � f � � � �.
a ` �, $ �r'� " "° �� ��
�
� "n '�.' ^ . A.`"'"' r"°` � � �' ✓ � � '� � "
� uwa-� "�+ �masr� �� -. � � ��,° , S W .. � �'� ' �.�� a �, � � � ��s�v`'z
.. � �� �*� � .� . �ao- *'�s �� . Y f�
� � � �������� ��'„����� � �' .,,�� ������'�s.3t'°�+ � ;�� S'�
� �� �, _
..��a .. �- � ° �
xa d � ,r" � � � t H �"'j
� � �� �� �'�� � ����� �� r' �� �` t t � �' �� �
� ; �`� y ,�`�> ris��� �' , "�"���� , � � � � � �.� �
� � �� � �� ���
>" � a � � �* ; a S . ,�'�.- � '� ���.� � « . �.°� '" �,�� s x�s� � 5 ' .
.. �$ �, �r�" , . � ,�? �s�` ��� r . .. o,. z �„ t �. �`*�3�
� � � � ��
�� E � � � ���� ���' � �� ai � �� , �
�. b �„ � �� � � � ' �,�;�,��,,� a � � �`�� ,���� "'
�¢ .:� � � ' € .t � ��.�.� ��� ���� a '^«-..... „,�.z o
� ,� 7 � ; a , �� ' , ` � �� �. - �' �� . a+ �` � a � ,,,� : ,�'� �. -
�. �. � " ; a* �"z�.�".�` a� : ' ,� �: � �� .,�
� � t� r � � �-�,� � t n�'�" � �1� i a ' '�` �
"� �� � � � ���� � ���� � '� '��
.. �
�k � � � '�'� �a �C �a � �'�,'��T`� `�� �,....,.�, ,�'�.> � .� .��� � � �`` §�x
� ;�`� � kj � S�a�' "'� "� ae: 1 � �' s r» �
�€ � � � � r � � , i r ; � �,"����,"� 3� � � �,��� � � ���.��� ` � � . � "
'� �:o-���`a'�� �'" � � '�� i� „�. ��' rt��" ,x ��v� �"`� � � � #� 16+� a� c ;,
� , .,�� �sL . � + °: � �� .r..� � ��: �� �b.+ � y '�,i,.�M �.u�` �b E �'� � �'�, �� �� �
a.� . y ., � � g� ss� �".�,' � Y �r' � r
� : � �,� � � �,e r� k�� � � � � r �
t � ; � ���� �,€ . � �,�' � � � > a �^ , �. »s,, � ,�
� � �„ � „�� � '�".r � r ,� � � ��` s �� �
4 � ��� . 3�„ � �f : '" i $ , i- .,g �a ,
a £' ��
,f � �� � �° � ,�. Y �I
�� � ts..,a)� k. �
�:� '�. � � U � -�° � �� � ""i�a��� :: �` `isat �,� � *t ,
�� � � � �# '"n� : 1 s � ; .. � a, �
��a� ti � � � �" �r � I +� � : � �, � w � �"� '�''� r- . '� `, �,
�3'� ` � n , i,� : * ; 1 F � ��.: ���` . � n 4 5 �k� �� a� :� � . a �r �3�� . ----�-"� 3 �
� � a� t � � �' x "'�3.� � ° � z . R
a��p s„� 'h� �' 3 v� .��Y..3'` 3f'..
. p t y � .; .,; '� c� �, � ' � �' � � �-� '4�b�� � a
, t�. ` m�: t aM. §iw• �„ � `�` ,� ..,,.re, � - -
S' � .h,
� � k � � r s �.. � k fi � �r '�r ����r � T "` � �
�=�w� �� �� ;� �+ �»�, A ..�. . S � .�+�` b: € � � � � U i � . �*� � ..� '' �,
s s � a�
: �'"* � � � � � � �", , « � s��.,` ���, M ,� � �—^�� "� k'.`� , � t �
, �
�� � ��r � �� � fi _ �°, �
- '�'� °
� # . � _
;' . _ ; .��-: ". ,� — ' �' � y� � ` 7 � � . � �'�� � '� �.
�
� " � � :4 �. ..
�
• • , F r� � ;�
� � �� �
� ��. /�• 2 �r f
�"'�'' ��. a','►"�l` +' �� �
� � � � , �► �� ��,� � ��y-�-�
� ������_�� J �
���� � ���y� �� i��` �.
� "uu�� �� �?�?�•�rrifi����
��4���� �'������ � �
5 r1►�� ' ;� � �Tlf' �
�� ��.'�: y�(Ij���. �ia �,•��.��,��
,cf,� i J�:'16��' .����,�;: �
I�'� �`;���r.�:�r . �Ls� ��
• � • � � `�-�� i ; . �..� ,A J.y
. ''�°�
�^'"�'.cia'� ''i -iI �`I .�C� �.
��� y�l��i�i,.��"�. ... ��, .nuii
l,\'�
���1
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
RESOLUTION NO. 2012-
FINAL PLAT AND SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT APPROVAL
CUB FOODS ADDITION
WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 462.358, the City of Apple Va11ey adopted, as
Chapter 153 of the City Code, regulations to control the subdivision of land within its borders; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 153 of the City Code, the City Planning Commission held a
public hearing on an application for subdivision of land by plat on August 1, �012; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission found the preliminary plat to be in conformance
with the standards of Chapter 153 of the City Code and recommended its approval on September 5,
2012, which was subsequently approved by the City Council on October 25, 2012; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 153 of the City Code, a subdivision agreement between the
applicant and the City detailing the installation of the required improvements in the subdivision and the
method of payment therefore has been prepared.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Apple Valley,
Dakota County, Minnesota, that the subdivision agreement and final plat for the following described
plat of land are hereby approved and the Mayor and City Clerk are authorized to sign the same, to wit:
CUB FOODS ADDITION
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, pursuant to Chapter 153 of the City Code, that said plat shall
be filed with the Dakota County Recorded within sixty (60) days of the certified release from the City
offices or such approval shal� be null and void.
ADOPTED this 13th day of December, 2012.
Mary Hamann-Roland, Mayor
ATTEST:
,
r � [-� /��
Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk D, �; ��-��
�
CERTIFICATE
As Apple Valley City Clerk, hereby certify that the forgoing is a true and correct copy of a
resolution adopted by the City Council and the final plat described therein is hereby released for
recording with the Dakota County Recorder this day of ,
Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk
a
- �
CUB FOODS ADD/T/ON
�
KNOW /LL PERSQVS BY MESE PRfSFNiS' �no! SVH Realty, Inc, a ONawore Coryaro!lon, owner of Me !ollawinq Oescribad OroPerty W�)' PLANNlNC COAIM/55QV
� � ApproreC bY fhe Plonnin9 Cwnmisson o/ Me Cify o/ Apde ✓olley, Minnesafa, fhis Oay oI 20�
!of i. Block I, APPLE ✓ALLEY REiAIL ADOIPON, accwLin9 to fhe re<arpaG O�at Merm/, Dakofa Cowty, Minnesofa, � .
. CM1Oii Secietoiy
Has couaed Ma some to ba s�i�+eye0 on� plattaC as CUB F0005 ADOITION ard does he-e6y tlonofe onE CeCimte fo fM1e Oublic iw public .
� use the p�blic xnys and tM1e Croinage and uf�Y%fy eosemmts ae c�eofeE Gy Mis plot.
arv caa+cn � �
� In wifness wM1ereo/ soid SVH Revlty, Inc., a Oelawaie cwporofian, hos causeC fhese presmis to be signe0 by ifs piaper offica this Rris plat o rored by [he Cit „CO�ncil ol Apple VolleY. Minnesofa. C fy of 20_�
ontl hereby certilies campliance w� oll requiremmis as sef /wth �m m�esota Sfotufes, Sec ian 05.OJ Subd 2
� _ CaY of 20�
s� aeun, avc . �
. . u cren �
e
rooa sneiao�, v.esre�e
srar[ a rm�sora �
�s��rv�menf w acknowleCgeU be/ore m m lhis _ day o/ 20� 6y ToOd ShelOan, Presitlent o/ SVH � m ���< in accwdance w1fM1 Minnesata Stafufes, Sectian 505 OT1, SvbC. I1, Mis plof has 6een renewep anC apO�ovetl thls
Reolty, Inc., a ONawore coPOiolion, on bMOI/ ol fhe corpwation. y��OOy o! 20_� �
. . TodO 6. TW/elsan .
. Dakota Ca.nty Surveyar
rvoewY MElic. � .
� My Cammiseion fxpiies gp�/tD L1� �pJNn' �pNMI$9'dl[RS
Pris alaf of CUB FO005 ADOl1IOrv wos approve0 punuonY to Minnesafa Statu<es Chopter 505 antl pursuant to Me Ookob County �
� Conf�guous Plaf Oi ance ans approveJ by resolufion o e BoorC o/ Cwnmissianeis o/ Ookofo Caunfy, Ninneso[a, af o iequlw meetMg
o� sore eowe �m., ��� aoy or ao� �
i nra.� e. soio. eo n�.my «.nrr mo� �n�. am� wo m� w ��da. my d;.�or .,� �..,s�a,; mot i om o amy r.roN,s�a iom. � .
so.m». �� ma smes or Mm�a:om; rno� m�e Wor9�: �0 6 :as.asa�rono� o ma eo�„e :�.rer, moe ai momemo�r�o� eom o�e Auesr
oans o. .eouy e�s;a���ee o� �n�, v mb uo� oi ��me��m e;«aa � m;.. a�o� no�« �� o.n� aa < aoie�oi ena, ���..er�or w end., co��ry eoo.o � co��ry r.aos�.a.-noeaa .
�no� w �oeone: e�a we< mmx o u�ee m Mr,,,,esom siom�es,�se�u� sos.w, s�ee's,�o: os me e -
s own / anE�labNeC on lhls plof: and o/I public are sM1Own on0 IaDe/ed an Nis plot. �
OofeO fhis .� day o/ .. 20� . � .
p£PMiMENi Q" PRQ°ERlY 7aXA MAV ANO REGl�R05
� Pursuant fo M fa Sfatutes, Section 505 O2I, Sub�. 9, foxes payvble in Me yeai 20� on fhe IanA hereinbe�we d sciiLed have
been poiJ. A/so,�punumt to Minnesala Sfa[ufes, Secfion 112.12, Ihere ore no OelMpuent taxes anJ hans/x enfere0 Mls Gay of
20�
Mark R. Salo, Licensetl CanC Surreyw. � �
Minnesoto L�tmse No. 93933 � '
Directw
Oepartment o/ Property RecorOS �
STA/E Q� NMNESOTA � � �p/ryIY pfGt]ppER, COUNIY Ci� DAKOTA SiA)E OF,INNNESOTA �
��'N � � Oocument Number � �
Shis Mstrumenf w acknoMeOgetl belore me on Mis _ day o/ 20_ by Mork R. SMq LanL Surveyw,
Minneaob License No. 4J933 � . l h rMy rerfi/y fhat this plat o�.CVB F0005 AOOITION was M1ieO in the o)iice o/ Me Lovnfy Recwder )w publlc recarL on this
� � e tlay o/ 20� at _ o clocN _M., ond was Euly fileC in Book o/ Pla[s.
Paqe as Oocumenf Number
e oev��y
. Co✓nty Recwtlei .
Notwy Fublic, . Ookota County, M�nnesoto � . i.
My Cwnmissian Erpires
W@StYY00tI
. . � . .. Professlonal5enices.lna �
. � sn�� r o � sn�r: �
_ '
�
� �
,
CUB FOODS ADD/T/ON
r ; �-_�� -T-��---T ---________
� �. .i I\ LJ ..: l l\ L_ L_ l - . �
I $ ��
� \
�e maM1t o� Bbr �`, \ . .
px on.rara �
a���
couHrvnwHror ..
. � war wav xa .u� �
- �'�� N89 J6"E 303.96 ---' - "-" � .
k_ _________ _ _ � _
I � - ` He �mi+�es°u�x�c , ____ R _____�______ ° -���jv___ __ de �
>sw ; �:
see°a'.u"w � ° zeoa - ' °-au a
N!B°H'J84� �__. ---- --------- ----- `�B \
n.00 , .r � .4 'd �7_______ . "_T \ \ '49' . \ NC/NI�MAP
n � $ gg � 0� _` _��� a s q3 $ . cznn im a
' � g Y '5,�, � y . \ f _-__� ___�
I � a°"° ` " � 8� � . �� /' . w ���' = .w,w Ho .�. . � .o � � � i srm i I
^`_Y V pry �� 8 "-� , � \ �S / � NEI/4I f
� � r.vnerau � y&� �,,l � LOT 2 8 w W 9 ^� . g� -�-___ j
$ R_ 1; ' �,crai .omna. � 8 LOT 9 �� ry � p � \ ue l SW 1/4 j s[ 1/4 j
;� �� �,
;� � �
� g�i%�x�e eaiw g ��� _? � \ � I I
� ___'____�
� 1 =± � ' � �—
��� \' �
C�� i •ooroo�rxau� � OOtiy \ ��nro rrs rs� m
«� I� p � �e �b,.w r. \ .
i , � �i'" � . ,�, �a�� � � .
��w„ s .� �
..,�l� a;4".� ;:'�._IW"Cj "'^a _ i F �� - r i �` n i vl �� '�� , � �
i < _ i i ^ r �f�j i I`J� v �' �\
., � I I Tn �i ; �vu Cj �
C� ?�°��a�� i i ��r i ��i�- �\
i , �-� � j � �_
c,�, �.� � I I , �n � �.�—' Cj
I�� V � � �� V% ��" -
:� � � �� i • C�
_, � � �,7 �_ �.�, ...,, , �
�
- 3 i ' j � ' ��
- M i i BLOCK f
� � � C> � i i
3 � � ��
�J' �. � N I I _ u'r ��_� . . �
c� I I i� '�. �>
a � � ::-; ar.nu n -., � o� � oo r:rr
�� �°- � I �_ —_�___<_______________ �J �L� ____ _ e � � .
��i� �i,; 8 -'-- --�-- --`-�---- j n
-- xes=.na-
, , o uaoo � 1_______ �________°_ °0° .
_____ _______________:ss_ �
a
; ) � I I r �; r �\ szrc,?�" �� � .
" I I .s.u'orz: � � �zao I .
I � � `� � ��1- �+ � � 5
f� i � � � . \4 t daxopet✓tattrT / � , N . � 0 50 100 150
I . j g �� \ scae n irer
. l � i �� � xcran noarmi � 2 �,
' �- I I . LOT 1 � ll I
. � I `�`:�� I �
C � �� f I I `� `� I I ALLEY RETA/L ADDI nON assumeC !o bear
` I �� N I I \,� �� . N00
I� � I I . � . . ��` �� � o omoees r/z rncn tiy la incn ir m mr
� I � . I - \ sef ond moiked by Licansa No.�4393J
. \� �'C I I � �I ll�l
. �l �� i � . g �
I �J
�,') � � I I . � I � ,vo mo��m��� :y,�,ed :now� or o�y:romte reo���<a
\, ; I �, I M89°5l'JSt�� . I �' � ontl hici� s / n pla e�on o� be/o e the Jlsf `,
EaY a! ✓ulY 1013.
�� i r-_.�__-1 � I \� . .
� I � \� �iam'vM � .
�'� � � � •� �` �'� .
r_,
I g � I � , � I. . .
�`. \ I
� 1 ____ � , LI J .
i F_"_"__ _"_"_ r \� � I
I g ��
I u��'^ I i_��___'_ rtcraan�irorv . 81 1 � i
,�� ��� � . ^ �
�e o'n�oin � rs ------'___„',__'_
Icouxrvmowror \ --_ __ses•ri'azaesrc \ ___'___ " �
�...M.P�QU. ,� ---------------------- � , ��,
-- _ � - -� _ rves°ervY rss_ � j
��`, �----- ;� ,,.0 - - - � `
uo>. , I
------ ----L---- �
, ` �ze
1 ' ;
,°. .1 ___ .rox.ro _____________
_=, - � m,ue� _�,'i r
sw i% ei s.� ii ��. � . _'"" N89 E 65358 -- ' � � � .
n n r � n,-� n n n � i n n i weStYllOOd
IVILI V/ \LJ rlUUl I Il/I V . � .
� Profealonel Services, Inc
� � � snea� s oi z.,n�ra � I
Z
� � ° G� � �'
� �--�
SUBDIVISION DE�ELOPMENT AGR.EEMENT
Setween
SVH REALTY, INC.
And
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
For
CUB FOODS ADDITION
�
r . O � ��
, �p
�
WHEREAS, the City of Apple Valley, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the "City"),
has been requested by SVH Rea.lty, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Owner), to approve for
recording tha following described subdivision of land:
The Plat of CUB FOODS ADDITION (the "Subdivision"); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to City Ordinances, the Planning Commission held a public
heaxing with reference to the application for approval of the plat on August 1, 2012; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended its approval on Septernber 5, 2012,
subject to conditions; and
WHEREAS, the City Council approved the preliminary plat on October 25, 2012, subject
to conditions;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual agreements of the parties it is
hereby agreed by and between the parties as follows:
1. Plat. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the City hereby
approves for recording the plat known as CUB FOODS ADDITION, as shown and noted on
Exhzbit "A" attached hereto.
2. Zonin�. This Subdivision is governed by the terms and conditians of the City's
Zoning Ordinance (the "Ordinance"). Any use or development of the Subdivision shall be in
accordance with the RB (Retail Business) provisions of the Ordinance.
3. Maintenance of Municinal Imnrovements. The municipal iinprovements
serving the Subdivision shall be maintained as follows:
A. The City shall only be responsible for maintenance of sanitary sewer lines located
within public streets and utility easements dedicated to the City. Maintenance of
service and lateral lines, installed outside of the public streets and easements
dedicated to the City and having a pipe of less than eight inches iil diameter, shall
be the responsibility of the individual property owner.
B. The City shall only be responsible for maintenance of water lines located within
public streets and utility easements dedicated to the City. Maintenance of
services, shut offs and lateral lines, installed outside of the public streets asid
easements dedicated to the City and having a pipe of less than six inches in
diameter, shall be the responsibility of the individual property owner.
C. The City sha11 only be responsible for maintenance of the storm sewer system
located within public streets and utility easements dedi�ated to the City.
Maintenance of catch basins and leads to manholes outside of the public streets
1-
and easements dedicated to the City shall be the responsibility of the individual
property owner.
4. Owner Installed Improvements. Subject ta the provisions hereunder, the Owner
shall g�ade the Lots in the Subdivision and install improvements within the Subdivisioii, in
accordance with and under the following conditions:
A. To install all utilities underground in the Subdivision, specifically including
electrical, telephone, cable television and gas services, prior to the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy for Lot 3. The Owner hereby represent that all utility
services will be available for a building prior to occupancy.
B. To grade the Subdivision in accordance with the grading and erosion control plans
approved by the City. The Owner shall also submit a copy of the of the GexZeral
Storm Water Pennit approval from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
pursuant to Minnesota Ru1es 7100.1000 - 7100:1 l00 regarding the State NPDES
Permit prior to commencement of gradiiig activity.
C. To install a protective box and cover over each sewer cleanout and water shutoff,
in accordance with plans approved by the City.
D. To install alI monuments for the Subdivision immediately upon recorcling of the
plat.
E. The Owner agrees to con�ply with all requirements of the Natural Resources
management regulations as set forth in Chapter 152 of the Apple Va11ey City
Code prior to, during and after the development of the Subdivision. The Owner
further agrees to submit to the City for its approval, a Natuxal Resources
Managament Plas� prior to any construction of land-disturbing activity in
connection with the construction on each Lot in the Subdivision. The Owner shall
implement and camply with all terms and conditions of the approved Plan prior to
and durin� any construction or land-disturbing activity, including, but not limited
to, maintaining the performance security required in Chapter 152 of the Apple
Valley City Code.
F. To install erosion c�ntrol measures in accordance with the Apple Valley Natural
Resource Preservation Plan. The Owner shall pay the City a fee as required by
Section 152.15 of the City Code aiid calculated by the City to offset the cost of
uispections to ensure compliance with the Plan. Payment shall be made at or
prior to the issuance of a Natural Resources Management Permit and building
permit(s).
2
G. To install City street trees on boulevard areas of public street right-of-ways, in
accordance with species, size, and spacing standards established in the Apple
Valley Streetscape Management Plan,
H. To connect private sidewallcs to those public sidewalks that allow for pedestrian
access to the Lots within the Subdivision.
L The Owner agrees that the most easterly intersection of the east/west drive aisle
located on the north side of Lot 1 sha11 be located no closer than 150 feet from
153rd Street West as measured from the south curb line of 153rd Street West to
the north curb line of the east/west drive aisle.
J. Construction shall occur in conformance with the Existing Conditions and
Removal Plan prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Tnc., dated
September 17, 2012.
K. Construction shall occur in conformance with the Civil Site Plan prepared by
Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated September 17, 2012, including
parlcing lot paving and a non-surmountable concrete curb and gutter around the
entire perimeter with a minimum driveway approach radius of 15' at each public
street, and a valley gutter at the edge of the street pavement.
L. Construction on Lot 3 shall occur in conformance with the Grading and Erosion
Contxol Pla�n prepared by Westwood Professional Seiwices, Inc., dated September
17, 2012, subject to submittal of a Natural Resources Management Permit
application for approval by the City.
M. Construction on Lot 3 shall occur in conformance with the Utility Plan prepared
by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated Septem�er 17, 2012.
N. Construction on Lot 3 shall occur in conformance with the Landscape Plan
prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated September 17, 2012,
(including soddedJseeded public boulevard area up to each street curbline);
subject to submission of a detailed landscape planting price list for verification of
the City's 2-1J2% landscaping requirement at the time of building permit
application, spacing of the trees to the satisfaction of the City's Natural Resources
Coordinator and replacement of the linden tree in the northeast axea of the
property with an ornainental tree.
O. Construction on Lot 3 shall occur in conformance with the elevation plan
prepared by Fendler Patterson Construction dated August 27, 2012.
P. Issuance of a building permit for Lot 3 shall be subject to the recording of a
"Declaration of Restrictions and Easements" document in a form acceptable to the
City Attorney that shall ensure the perpetual maintenance of the common storm
water and sanitary sewer lines.
3
Q. Issuance of a building permit for Lot 2 shall be subject to the City's prior written
approval of final plans for Lot 2 zncluding the final site plan, utility plan,
elevation plan and landscape plan, subject to submission af a detailed landscape
planting price list for verification of the City's 2-1/2% landscaping requirement at
the time of building permit application. Construction on Lot 2 shall occur in
conformance with the final plans approved by the City.
R. Any site lighting for Lot 2 or Lot 3 shall consist of downcast, shoebox lighting
fixtures or wallpacks with deflector shields which conf'ine the light to the property
and shall be in conformance applicable city regulations.
S. A separate application and signage pla�1 in conformance with the sign regulations
mt�st be submitted for review and approval to t11e City prior to the erection of any
signs.
T. Consl.ruction sha11 be limited to the hours of 6:00 a.m, to 10:00 p.rn. Monday
through Friday. Weelcend construction hours shall be limited to the hours of
8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Saturdays only.
U. Earthmoving activities shall be limited to the hours of 6:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
Monday through Friday. No earthmoving activities sha11 be performed on
Saturday or Stiuiday.
V. Earth-moving activities shall not occur when wind velocity exceeds thirty (30)
miles per hour. Watering to control dust sha11 occur as needed and whenever
directed by the Apple Valley Building Official or Zoning Administrator.
W. The Owner agrees to attend a meeting with representatives of the City, which
meeting requires the attendance of a11 contractors and subcontractors, prior to
commencement of any improvements.
X. The Owner will not bury any pipe nor insta.11 bituminous surface nor pour
concrete without the specific approval of the City Inspector, which approval shall
not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed and shall be made by
applying City standards uniformly and consistently applied in other City projects,
prior to the worlc being performed.
Y. To delivei and to lceep in existence with the City letters of credit or cash escrows
in the original aggregate amount of $16,436.00 to secure the performance and
payment of the obligations under this Agreement to the satisfaction of the City.
�ach letter of credit must contain a provision that it is automatically renewable for
successive one-year periods unless at least thirty (30) days prior to its expiration
the issuer delivers written notice to the City of its intention to not renev� the letter
of credit. Following receipt of notice of non-renewal, the City may at any time
4
thereafter, preseiit the letter to the issuer and draw in cash the remaining principal
obligation under the letter of credit.
Z. Issuance of a Building Permit and a final certi�cate of occupancy for each Lot is
contingent upon the project being constructed 'ul conformance with all the
preceding conditions as well as all applicable performance standards of the
current zoniiig regulations. In the event that a certificate of occupancy is
reqiiested prior to completion of all required site impxovements, a suitable
financial guarantee in the amount of 125% of the estimated cost of the unfinished
improvements shall be required along with an agreement authorizing the City or
its agents to enter the premises and complete the required improvements if they
axe not completed by a reasonably stipulated deadline, with the cost of such City
completioi� to be charged agaulst the fitiancial guaxantee.
AA. The ongoing use and occupancy of the premises is predicated on the ongoing
maintenance of the structure and all required site improvements as listed in the
preceding. No alteration, removal, or change to the preceding building plans or
required site improvements shall occur without the express authorization of the
City. Site improvements which have deteriorated due to age or wear shall be
repaired or replaced in a timely fashion.
BB. That any material violation of the terms of this Agreement and in particular this
section, shall a11ow the City to stop and enjain all construction in the Subdivision
until authorization to proceed is given by the City. The Owner agrees to hold the
City harmless from any damages, causes of action, or claims related to the
construction being stopped by the City.
5. Occupancv. No occupancy of any building in the Subdivision shall occur until
water, sanitary sewer, and a paved surface are available for use to that building.
6. Service Fees. Upon submission of a building permit applicatioil(s), the ap�licant
shall pay the City for the public services fi�rnished to each Lot within the Subdivision, an amount
as determined below upon the basis of units (per building) as determined by the City Engineer,
which amount sha11 be paid in the following manner:
(i} Sewer Availability Charge - The rate per unit is based on tl�e year in which the
building permit is issued (presently $2,646.00 per unit -$2,365.00 Metro and
$281.00 City). The person who applies for a building permit shall pay, at the time
of the issuance of the permit, an amount equal to the rate tirnes the number of
units. This fee is subject to change if the obligation of the City to the Metropolitan
Waste Control Commission changes.
(ii) Water System, Supply and Storage Charge - The rate per unit is based on the year '
in which the building permit is issued (presently $766.00 per unit). The person
5
who applies for a building permit shall pay, at the time of the issuance of the
permit, an amount equal to the rate times t11e number of units.
7. Park Dedication. The parties mutually racognize and agree that park dedication
requirements for the Subdivision, as provided in Chapter 153 of the City Code, shall be satisfied
by a cash payment of $15,600.00. This amount is due and payable prior to the release of the plat
for recording.
8. Storm Water Dedication. The parties mutually recognize and agree that the
storm water pond dedication and infiltration requirements, as provided in Chapter 153 of the City
Code, have been satisfied.
9. Li�htin�. The Owner inust provide to tlle City a ligliting system plan for the
Subdivision, in accordance with Section 155.353 of the City Code. The Owner sha11 install a
private street lighting system, constructed to City and Dakota Electric Company standards.
10. Access Restriction. The Owner shall execute and record with the piat an access
restriction easement in favor of the City to restrict driveway access from Lots 2 and 3 of the
Subdivision to 153 Street West in the form attached hereto as Exhibrt "B". The Owner shall
deliver a duplicate executed original of the agreement to the City prior to the release of the plat.
11. Utility Easement and Maiutenance A�reement. The Owner sha11 execute and
record with the plat an agreement in a form acceptable to the City Attorney for all shared utility
lines that extend across multiple Lots within the Subdivision. The Owner shall deliver a
duplicate executed original of the agreement to the City prior to the release of the plat.
12. Cross Access and Parlun� Agreement. The Owner shall execute and record
with the plat an agreement in a form acceptable to the City Attorney to allow for access and
parking over and across all Lots within the Subdivision. The Owner shall deliver a duplicate
executed original of the agreement to the City prior to the release of the plat.
13. Proof of Parkin� A�reement. The Owner shall execute and record with the plat
a Proof of Parlcing Agreement in the form attached hereto as Exhibit "C". The O�vner shall
deliver a duplicate executed original of the Proof of Parlcing Agreement to the Gity prior to the
release of the plat.
14. As-Built Surveys. The Owner must provide the City with as-built surveys
("Survey") for each builc�ing constructed within the Subdivision, prior to the issuance of the
Certificate of Occupancy ("CO") for that buildiilg; provideci, in the event tlie Owner is
6
proceeding in good faith to obtain the Survey, and the Survey's availability is the only
impediinent to the City's issuance of the CO, the City agrees to accept a deposit of $5,000.00 to
ensure completion of the Survey and upon receipt of such deposit, the City will issue t1�e CO.
15. Release. The Owner hereby specifically release the members of the City Council
fram any personal liability in connection with handling funds pursuant to the terms of this
Agreement, and fu�ther agree to indemnify and hold the members of the City Council harmless
from any claim, of any and every nature whatsoever caused or contributed to by the acts or
omission of the Owner except for the members' willfizl misconduct, that may axise as a result of
tliis AgreerneiYt or the creating of the Subdivision.
16. Sindin� Terms. The parties mutually recognize and agree that a11 terms and
conditions of this Agreement run with the Subdivision and sha11 be binding upon the respective
heirs, administrators, successors and assigns of the Owner.
TN WITNESS WHER�OF, the parties have executed this Agreement to be efFective as of
the day of , 2012.
O WNER:
SVH Realty, Inc., a Delaware corporation
By:
Its:
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
By: Mary Hamann-Roland
Its: Mayor
By: Pamela J. Gacicstetter
Its: City Clerk
7
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF )
On this day of , 2012, before me a Notary Public within and for
said County, personally appeared to me personally l�,nown,
who being by me duly svvorn, did say that he/she is the of SVH
Realty, Inc., a Delaware corporation, named in the instrument, and that said instrum.ent was
signed on behalf of said corporation by authority of the corporation and acknowledged said
instrument to be the free act and deed of the corporation.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF DAKOTA )
On this _ day of , 2012, before me a Notary Public within and for said
County, personally appeaxed Mary Hamann-Roland and Pamela J. Gackstetter to me personally
lcnown, who being each by me duly sworn, each did say that they axe respectively the Mayor and
Clerk of the City of �pple Valley, the municipality named in the foregoing instrument, and that
the seal affixed on behalf of said municipality by authority of its City Council and said Mayor
and Clerk acltnowledged said instrumeilt to be the free act and deed of said municipality.
Notary Public
THIS 1NSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY:
DOUGHERTY, MOLENDA, SOLFEST
HILLS & BAUER P.A.
'1300 West 147th Street, Suite 600
Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124
(952) 432-3136
(MDK: 66-32851)
8
i i
CUB FOODS ADD/T/ON
,
r--------- �� - r_� _� r ------_---_-_,
� i �.i! \ Ll v I%\ C_ L l . �
1 $ � � \
� I Rom F'vht�� �. . � . .
\
�maru- � e� �
A�
\
:• N99° 36'E' JOJ.fl6 "' \
,� _'_'_"_"_ - '
APV _ __ xas°r.J¢Y�wYS� � ' �° '-1 �yyl�'_���.� q `�° \ .
'� �asu�� xro ____R____"'____"
!
�
I iv.m F � �-., .� ti ___'��___-__'_F7_'__"_ _szz ' '_�� T1/�" `��•. . . \ \ . UIXNRY�AP
n I � a �� '^ a � e ��� xo..w
�`� 8� � 9.e Y �a=+�.s's:-�� �'�e.�u' R \ r___T___'
i � -f� a 8 " t !� � � z ,p�^'f` . s ar.e r � s . \ i � ssu � . � .
I o`ovi ��v.: A : V '� / w� µ v v.w xa ar \ � \ . a„� Nw 1 r� r/s�
I °'�'r vnv r.a .ss ' d -t+' E a � .carnc« J `5 8 ' h' � \ . . $.� t --/{ p � �
� t �� � LOT 2 g 7 .* J i N' - � - _'_1
I �' $
��i $ coT3 1�� ��ISw�/sj�t/fi 4
.i-' v � •.
< . ,
:• � 4 , S t
"� ` i i
i s �Y'' ,:,.,��d.b, � � - -� \ �---J----'
� = , �
.-�;' � �
�;� 1 '' xo.w . . . � . �s.�o� n:e n naz m
� �`� �i ""°�.''°'' �'�� \ .
� . �
� ,., u+:. s _ , J i � . +� �^ .
� . . I u �c�..•. , �i . ^y., `@ . �
��o w� s i anno � `.�\
� ii a�i 5.a N 1. w� u �a�m I I � � I n n v ' um+nxYe �� � .
�� I ~mm
� `- i i ' A r�l � ��� � \�
. _� � -, i i � � n I I �IJ , �� \
I e �
C � � � i \/ L 1`..
r" i
c:� �.; �� i , n i L.L_ i `,
_� I`� V I i �)��I L, v � L ..... . � �J .
° I I � L.
n I 1 /�� � BLQ .� 7 c�
Cl � C) I I
�� i � i I
ly I F � � I. ,:'` _ . .
� � � r �aorrwv � '
� I :
�mu v
n o i �' � ,.
_ `.��.
� ,
' o�
; rnrw , c
� �, % � ° i L________—_<_________�� __�r.>vaau..a��� �
�i� Ii,L g � s,mau - '--�—'—___ ___ ' C � � �
S
C) � i r--------t� r-�------ u `- ° '-------- - � ----------�« , h
`�. I � � ,�•���: � �.-----�,�-,.2�'e � w�
i � '� � ^,'�,�,, ^ w o w ,ao ,w
1'�� j. I L � J ~ cr� y"` I �` . 5Mv n rroF
� � i� i'ra � ,�.� .«.,�, �':� ; g � 1
' F ' i i . LOT 1 � . �
.' i i �
�� �� �I i ,�•.j 1��� . � vt���ii��ti�tomr
� � , ;.� wm°oY1Tw.'
� _ I C � ' i i � ` o o..ve.. r/z :.a ar rs s,c, a,,, ����w.t
� � 1 I � \ . aet mN me.Ned bY (rcns Ko- Li9N
� I 1 � � �
I L ��
_L Ft - i 1 - . $' ..
�� C� I I 1 . . .
. (: ) 1 �� � � � � � � � � � � iocob'a; i,m�m� �eror �o�� �mar �r ae n
�.� �
� �� N C] �� r� er.aE rm.^T?� i � l . . � . a r w.�wx mri s. yoce o� .P e.r v� .nse .
. . �al � �--<---" . . . � °'°.a'ao''r" � .
i _ �
��i $ i � �\ ,�: �'i=� . .
� i x i � `,, • .
r
. I ' I ' ` � `� \IJ .
:_��..-. a� c�.e � i
rF,- _
' i ��: ai �''
i �-�� �^.�,�„ , a �1
,'�.
,M.�,. ; i �-------- �` `� � i �
i „„ ��� � �. ;s ------
� � �- � ---- ------------- � y�
� i�.r�>.ro• , - -- - � v. ------ -------
��..v..� �ri . � � — ,._ —_-- _-- _—_=_--- �
��,s
— —�� _
,� Z.____ -- � z _ vasvrsremssa � � I
i
s.
,
_____'_ ' —.— — — —
' '__'__L____'_ '
�-- � � `•� ��e ..�� r -- — — — — -
�I s�o _
;i� oi s. ��_ NH9°fY.A'� fi33J5 _-- .
' �a Ar �)n � �r-,,T,r,R, . Westuuood �
� f V l L I V/`i t \ Ll rl V LJ! f 1 V I V � . professqny 5ervice� �x
EXHtBIT =�� �
� � �r�a
a
_ _._
_ I
� �
CUB FOODS ADD/T/ON
I
�
. �w.� � a,. � � �� � a�� a� o �� �.�,. o.�� e, �, �.:�� a,.�.e �,.� �.,�� �.
.. � NV�uM bY Mv Nwmirr4 Commisson oY thc f.H a` bNe VMeX Mfimaaota M4 GvY o! �
� Let �. &xk �. .tPHE vKtf� REIAk AOLtll1P'4 a�w^9 la e/m .eeavM Mo! Meeol. OWOb LountY vimramta � � .
. qa,� � Ssv�lw3'
Has cwaed Ma .+vne to M aVrw�e! anJ p1aMN as Q1B FU0�5 A0011NJN wrd Qws hsp6Y JonoN aM >M2vts 4 Me pubf,c !w yw� � '.
uae lM1e P�AC roJS wW Grc dv1ha9e md �6L'W amvnantr as awfcd 6Y Mb NoG . . ',.
h.ilnea Mrvau! aaH SN FwIfY• �+�. v OlJa.ue colvabbt �oi emnad lhma Y�^b tn be algnM 6Y :b YaYr elll'wr fhk lMSVIa� aPYVUM by tl.e G'[y Laundl of Wde lb9e% ✓�mele. Mvs 6Y U Z/ � �'',.
_ aor a m� � ew n«osr e..s'nea c�W.w.�. �rn en .,w;.e,�.�m s:.< �n � u:.�.eow seoa.e.e s�ero�� em.os s�ae z i
� . Sur p�tm, ac . � . � I
� . ucru- . a.n �
� Todd 9MJS, Mddat � . .
� AATE d�YlNN60fA . I
CO %N � Y ,rstru�.v.t .m oG�aMM4� M/wv ma m Mh � day of Z0� Dy faa'J 9Mdw.. /hs'Ee�! M SHI CO(PVlY R.WKtLR f n accwdmm M Y'vnese<v StsNfe. Sstim SOSPl/. Sub6 /I. MIa Odt hm bea. w.:e..ed mM �puwd Lrh .
- RMIrt Pe. O �e'orae wrpwoUOn. m 6�df of tM CnpweNne � . - _Q^YW M�
. � reee a. rai.F.o�. �
owxa cou�b svr.a�or .
wev.y a�sFC ..
u ee,�mm.r. cmro . � �e� rr mwnssa�rs� �v-�a o��e ro.w..noeo smm<a, rh sas m.e o�.� m rn� oowao ewMy
emNr ws cr,e mrm�ce mro wc..+.w ay.e.d�um er n< soo�v or u�..�:+�.�r a owem ew�U: ua�..oaa a� a..g�a�.�.�eM
� er mre em.a ma am-oe . m� .
� uw. z xra ao x.my ro.ary ao� ro;. c�� w: nom� er ma >«�a., y e�r aw�aa n<e i� o mn c��s.a wd .
s,„.��e- M ae s�te er u:�,� �a� a=e r.a awe a e eo-�«e .�o.�.mxw. or ne eow,e.+r ,�..�x uar w...,a.«.we;�m aoee e�rt
vea: �«....<nr o.,a�a.a � u,� dee r�x m��.,��,m �ma � mn doc �� a�..,. a.+� e. �u� .�< .%m;�. m. r� ow:, tmnH srwt �nb nevw�ar-rwam.
�a. ° �o.a +� �w Mv �c ��a d�-oy+�„s y •'wo �e m reer� � a pm. sae. x w a ae ao�e or ars c.tie�o�. ar. .
� . ooe.e dw .� eor or m�
� � o�.�a�uExr a aa�rrm rnz�rtw .wo r�mws
Nranf le N'emmotc Sfofvt¢ RcN» 505.03l. 9.bd. 9. [mra PaWMe «a the Xar YO—� r.^ tl�e hM /....<�belve QesaOM haw
� been. PNQ- ��so� 0�/�t b N/�em(o SlaNles. Sectica ZTL(2 Maa mv na PWTOUmt Mas aM Cwslr antsa0 T4 � UOy W
m�
Yorlr 2 Salp, L@enaeE Land 5 y� .
Nnnemtv licerar Na tMI3 � � �
Wiecdr
. � � . OepaNnnt ee PKperfy ReewOs �
StA1E�I�1NAE3DTA . � . NNIY�.QXXlY[FQAKOTA.STAiEGi/MKk.WTA � .
�'m�bwnwr[ xac ad.�eMeEqeC b�fae ma m Mis �_ LvY e/ � � bYYart R Sal4 lA�rd Survele'- Oaamrsrf Num6s .
Yvinesota C%mz Na l39JS. � nerasY eerUY dwt Mir paf o/ CVB F�OS.f�'�' xos llled M Wa o/� o( Ne CUVnfY Readv N Pudtic remrd en Mu
_ dvY N ZJ_� at � vdoeF �W. arQ na du(y Ned 'n Bua4 of Hofs. '
Page as Oacvmak Numbc '
. � . � . BY � oW!V .
f, fY Racar&r .
� He �� � Oabb CewrFX Miin�sofo . .
ur c���. e ;.e., .
i
I
W@S'tWOOd
. . . . . Pmfesional Servkes.Inc
� s*e.t r er z s.Rm �
' EXHIBIT "B" TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
ACCESS RESTRICTION EASEMENT
THIS EASEMENT is made this day of , 2012, by SVH Realty,
Inc., a Delaware corporation, (hereinafter referred to as "Landowner") in favor of the City of
Apple Valley, a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "City"}.
Landowner, in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, does
hereby grant and convey unto the City, its successors and assigns, a permanent easement for
access restriction purposes over, under and across the property legally described as follows:
A strip of land one foot (1') in width over that part of Lots 2 and 3, Blocic 1, CUB
FOODS ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Dalcota County,
Minnesota, lying southerly of the northerly line of Block 1.
(the "Easement Area"). See also Exhibit "A" attached hereto aud incorporated herein.
This easement is granted for and limited to the express purpose of restricting vehicular
access to 153 Street West, except at locations permitted by the City, over anc� upon the
Easement Area, it being understood:
1. The City shall have no obligation to maintain the �asement Area and that the
Landowner, its successors and assigns, may sod, seed, plant and maintain the Easement Area,
provided that no driveway or other form of accessway may be constructed thereon.
2. The purpose of this easement is strictly limited to access restriction and the City
sha11 have no right to utilize the Easement Area for any other purpose by reason of this easement.
Landowner does covenant with the City that it is the fee ovmer of the Easement Area and
has good right to gxant and co�vey the easement herein to the City. This easement shall run with
the land and shall be binding on Landowner and its successors and assigns.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Landowner has caused this instri.iment to be executed as
of the day and year first written above.
�
r , O � �� ,
�
��
SVH Realty, Inc., a Delaware.corporation
By: •�
Its;
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF )
On this day of , 2012, before me a Notary Public within and for
sa.id County, personally appeared to me personally known,
who being by me duly sworn, did say that he/she is the of SVH
Realty, Inc., a Delaware corporation, named in the instrument, and that said instrument was
signed on behalf of said corporation by authority of the corporation and acicnowiedged said
instrument to be the free act and deed of the corpora__ tion.
---.
Notary Public
THIS 1NSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY:
DOUGHERTY, MOLENDA, SOLFEST, HILLS & BAUER P.A.
7300 West 147th Street, Suite 600
Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124
(952) 432-3136
MDK (66-32874)
���������° � �����z��� �� : ��� -
_ . . ,
� � ��� ����� �������� -
. � , _ .. . .
_________________��_._�
��� A . ,
� _—'— ! �r.v�.� �I �i� . "'4 a .. . J 9#PT+_Ar� �FiF4*�I�� i � ` '
� # � �� . . . ..4 . °�' ..�.� . � .... . . ,. . � ���.i�°�n . .
� ��� �
. � .m.s^ . . � 5,,,,� � .
, � �^�`. � � " - � � . x. . y. � ' . .
. � . � 5 . � � � u. .�..�w�.��.Nl.—. � + ^a �� W4�'@°l�OP
� un ��.i � ' p � x � ����� 2• � ^,� �. . . . .
� 4 � ,+�..+.,, _ •�`�"'*'� eq '. n 3 �.� • t� �.t;v...
� G'r,5.Tn1G ki .^�..Je'. +as3 `'S,i`'.. . � �'� ' ..�`.."� �
� p �� �t � `4, . � � �iasW�a,.r� i
. � 1 } ^' � w ��' .�� �t„ � 4�......�. i . .
. I �� , � � . R �.
�
� '� r
. . � . . _ , . `�,.�' � . .
� .: f
����w,�sse�a:s, � i..� � , � f :�t . . �`� � � ' .
-' "`i
� � i ` ��� �� � ,��. �.�� . .
G � E �eb.; � � ��, .�
#� �yt �'eL. F �'+ -
"� f � 3 �'°
� * � � : Y�£''4 •,�' J �
�� � E f � � �a�� 1 � � a ��
r �
ti� � � ' t '`�� � �e.�r �v � �
� � ,s�" � .^--!'"":� x C � .
� �� �
C � I � � .,��,«,�, `�. x
�� E � . �+a.wam�s _ . � _
������� �a�
.... m — . �......�..... .�
m+�
awaF
��+'� y - �i�� � .�..�,.r�' .�.w w�nww.w.sa.wwwwwwi..w��.ww�. —ae+ �— � �
. . . u � yd�!N ' ,i . .
� a 1 , . ,�- • .
� � . ��
�� .
�; � � . } �:, �� �� �,;: .- �
� � '�M ; s � �@ . . � �� . .
C,7 � �5 � � .. � �� ` . +� .'k+ `�.r'�"q(:��F'� n"4 i�w �
` � � j � � ' � , �r , . � a �.�r�'�ni�rE�ex'+�'a'�'+.�en�' .
. � . a �� .� � . . �`f �� .. . � .
� ' �
�' �
� . {f! 9 g � • #' � r....r � ' , t . ��» . ,]�` �1��!`,�„�'`��.If+�+�u'�Ffiw.��'�GV� �� tandw�t�*+
. � yS �il �.'��� i . ',t�elr5` s`�s'�e�*".a�.'$�' ;
f �� t�
�'.�, " { �'d
� � �°~ �..,� �' '�
'�� �� .�.,:�.__ " -�== — : ��: �p-� � �� " � . ',
n _._._..._..__ .
� ��� . _ �. � .�.,�,_-------
• a r �� t � �^ .n ,� r� �^.�a.nm a ��C�
— � dVCCnt SFtIS!'a' .?L�" S iVf'Y � . . , . .
,.w.aur.a,mwrv�.o..w,.,��..moww«mx..aw - ���� . .
. - ������� �1 . . . .
f ' ,
EXHIBIT "C" TO DEVELOPMENT AGI2EEMENT
PROOF OF PARKiNG AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of , 2012,
by and between the City of Apple Valley, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the "City"), and
SVH Realty, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Owner).
WIIEREAS, the Owner is the fee title holder to property legally described as follows:
Lot l, Blocic 1, CUB FOODS ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Dakota
County, Minnesota
(the "Property");
WHEREAS, a total of 419 parlcing spaces (assuming 71% net usable floor axea) or a total
of 495 parking spaces (assuming 85% net usable flaor area) are required for the Cub Foods
grocery store currently located oil the Property, pursuant to the City Code;
WHEREAS, the Owner has applied to the City for approval to maintain the number of
parking spaces initially constructed on the Property at 399 parlcing spaces;
WHEREAS, the Owner has demonstrated that the parlcing required on the Property by the
City Code inay exceed the actual demand for parking and that sufficient parking will be provided
by the 399 parking spaces already in existence ou the Property; and
WHEREAS, �lie City aclulowledges that the Owner does not need to immediately
construct and install that portion of the off-street parking area depicted as "reserved parlcing" in
fhe site plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "A", and said parking area shall
be reserved for future construction and installation in accordance with the terrns anc� conditions
of this Agreemeilt and in accordance with Section 155.377 of the City Code;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the City and the Owner agree as
follows:
�
�` p p �
���
p� j
1. Recordin� of Agreement. This Agreement shall be recorded with the Dalcota
County Recorder and the Owner sha11 provide an.d execute any and all documents
necessary to implement the recording of this Agreement. The recording of this
document shall constitute notice to all owners, occupants and future owners or
occupants of the Praperty that such owners and occupants have waived all rights
to object to future City action in accordance with this Agreement pertaining to the
construction of the reserved off-street parking area.
2. Waiver of Installation of Reserved Parlcin�Area. The City agrees that the Owner
need not construct and install that portion of the off-street paxlcing area designated
as "reserved parlcing" on the site plan in Exhibit "A", except as otherwise provided
in this Agreement.
3. Maintenance of Reserved Paxlcin�a. The area within the Property designated
as "reserved parlcing" on the site plan attached hereto as E�ibit "A" shall be
maintained as an open green space and shail not be reduced in area or dimension
so as to interfere with the reserved parlcing area's capacity to meet the minimum
parl�ing reqLiirements for the Property under the City Code.
4. Installation of Reserved Parlcin�ea. Notwithstanding Paragraph 2 above, the
Owner agrees to install improvements, in accordance with the design and
maintenance requirements of the City Code, for 37 off-street parking spaces in the
reserved parking area upon order of the City. The City xna� order the construction
and install�,tion of the off-street parking area when the City determines, in its sole
discretion, that the use upon the Property requires additional parking area. Such
determination may be based in part upan parking on City streets and/or parking on
unpaved areas of the Property. The Owner shall construct and install, at its own
cost, the off-street parlcing area within sixty (60) days of receipt of written notice
by the City to the Owner demanding the construction and installation of the off-
street parkiiig area; �rovided, however, that if weather conditions prevent the
Owner from having a reasonable opportunity to coinplete this work within sixty
(60) days following the Owner's receipt of written notice from the City, the sixty
(60) day period shall be extended by as many days as are necessary to provide the
Owner a reasonable opportunity to complete this worlc.
5. Default If the Owner fails to coilstruct and install the required off-street paxking
area upon order of the City as required herein, the City may bring an action for
legal or equitable relief or may pursue any other xemedy available to the City. The
Owner shall be responsible for the City's attorneys' fees and costs related to
enforcement of this Agreement, including collection costs, regardless whether the
CiTy commences litigation to enforce this Agreement.
6. Bindin�A��reement. The parties mutually recognize and agree that all terms a�id
conditions of this recordable Agreement shall run with the land herein described
2
and shall be binding upon the heirs, successors, adrninistrators and assigns of the
Owner referenced in this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be made as of the
date set forth above.
City of Apple Va11ey, SVH Realty, Inc.,
a Minnesota municipal corporation a Delaware corporation
By: Mary Hamann-Roland By�
Its: Mayor Its:
By: Pamela J. Gackstetter
Its: City Clerk
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF DAKOTA )
On this day of , 2012, before me a Notary Public within and for said
County, personally appeared Maiy Hamaml-Roland and Pamela J. Gackstetter to me personally
known, who being each by me duly sworn, each did say that they are respectively the Mayor and
Clerk of the City of Apple Valley, the municipality named in the foregoing instrument, and that
the seal affixed on behalf of said municipality by authority of its City Council and said Mayor
and Clerk acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said municipali
�
�`��
Notary Public
3
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF )
On this day of , 2012, before me a Notary Public within and for said
County, personally appeared to me personally known, who
being by me duly sworn, did say that he/she is the of SVH Realty,
Inc., a Delaware corporation, named in the instrument, and that said instrument was signed on
behalf of said corporation by authority of the corporation and acic�owledged said instrum t to
be the free act and deed of the corporation,
Notary Public
THIS INSTRiJMENT WAS DRATTED BY:
DOUGHERTY, MOLENDA, SOLFEST
HILLS & BAUER P.A.
7300 West 147th Street, Suite 600
Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124
(952) 432-3136
(MDK: 66-32851)
4
U
153rd STREET
PERMITTED
�—_�_,,.._---- --
SIGN AREA 3
'"' �' `�
, r r m / ,. � ,�.
�
� � . I � 10 � 55 STALLS ` � _
� 38 STALLS
PERMITTED � RES7. A ' I � .
SIGN AREA� 1 LOT 2 b " ``
� � RETA�L B �
i � J 8 6 B I H ° LOT 3 /
i �^ e �
/
`
� d " I
�
� Q I
I
I . � 392 STAL — .
I
I — I
I — �
W I
Z W I N 4t N 9A �1 S! 12 IE J/ 7i �
� ` I � J '° �" .fJ . R% RX _ �
a � .� .� �
� �—;:::... --- - --- - --r----
. Q 1 �"' .. _.. — — — — � ��r� y � .
. . . 0 I ... .._ � . � . � I .
U j...... ...;..; �resuvi �A
I �...... .. .., � _
. i...P�tOOF Ofi...j I
I ; .F�ARKING:�„? . . .
; 87ALL,S,...;
;:::::: ::::::; CUB FOODS I
I ;..-::: :::...< LOT 1
� ;.�... ....e.� . . I .
❑ t' I
� j I
� ' ' �
� ' 47 3TALL3 I
I I
�
I
L� � � �� .�. � � � _ � �� � �� �� ��
BUILDII�G AREAS - - - - -
APPLE VALLEY - BUILDING AREA PLAN ExHieiT 0 31 12
�
���
�-. a . �
...
....
.....
....
...
City of App�e
Va��ey MEMO
Public Works Department
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator
FROM: Gregory P. Brady, Building Official
DATE: December 13, 2012
SUBJECT: AGREEMENT FOR AV PROJECT 2012-157, BUILDING 1NSPECTION
SERVICES
Attached for your consideration is an agreement for building inspection services with A to Z
Home Inspections LLC (AHI). This contract would be in force from date of approval through
December 31, 2013.
The Building Inspections division is temporarily understaffed by one inspector through the end
of 2012. In addition, the recent increase in new construction along with the more consistent
remodeling of existing homes has resulted in longer than average wait times for service.
Contracted building inspection services will provide additional support during these periods of
increased building activity.
Under the terms of the agreement, AHI would provide building inspections services on an hourly
basis during peak demand times exceeding the capacity of current city staffing. AHI would
maintain insurance coverage, workers compensation insurance, vehicle and auto insurance for their
staff. The Building Inspection division will continue to perform the administrative functions of
issuing permits, scheduling inspections, providing correction notices, and maintaining permit
records.
Recommended Action:
Approve Agreement with A to Z Home Inspection LLC, for AV Project 2012-157, Building
Inspection Services.
GPB:cIg
c: Todd Blomstrom, Public Works Directar
Attachments
AGREEMENT
FOR BUILDING INSPECTION SERVICES
AV PROJECT 2012-157
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA
THIS AGREEMENT is made this day of December, 2012, by and between the
City of Apple Valley, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and A to Z HOME
INSPECTION LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company ("AHI"), to set forth the terms and
conditions pursuant to which AHI may, from time to time, provide City with professional
services (the "Services") consisting of inspections of buildings within the City of Apple Valley
(each individually a "Project").
The contract documents that comprise the entire agreement between City and AHI
concerning the Services consist of this Agreement, the Work Orders, insurance policies, change
orders, and additional documents specific to the particular Project, as listed in the Work Orders,
and together they set forth the terms and conditions under which AHI will provide the City with
the Services described therein.
In consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, City and AHI
hereby agree as follows:
1. Responsibilities of AHI.
1.1 Services. City may, in its sole discretion, from time to time request AHI to
perform professional services pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. City will authorize such
Services by executing a Work Order specifying the Project and the date for completion of the
Services. Upon receipt of a signed Work Order, AHI shall perform the Services pursuant to the
terms of the Work Order and this Agreement. City may order changes to the Work Order
consisting of additions, deletions or other revisions, which shall be authorized by written Change
Order. If AHI is unwilling or unable to perform the requested Services, AHI shall promptly notify
City's representative who authorized the Services. City's representatives with individual
authority to execute Work Orders and Change Orders are the Public Works Director and the
Building Official for the City of Apple Valley.
1.2 Performance Standards. AHI shall provide its Services in a professional manner
that is consistent with the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar
circumstances by reputable members of its profession practicing in the same locality. AHI shall
comply with all applicable laws, regulations and ordinances and with inspection procedures
established by the City.
1.3 Qualifications of Inspectors. AHI represents and warrants to City that every
person performing Services under this Agreement shall meet the competency criteria and
continuing education requirements for construction code inspectors established by the
commissioner of labor and industry pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 326B.135 or must hold current
certification as a building official under Minn. Stat. § 326B.133.
1.4 Time for Performance of Services. AHI shall perform the Services in each Work
Order in the sequence and time specified in the Work Order and as otherwise required by the
progress and nature of the Project. An inspector employed by AHI shall be available to perform
the Services as needed between 8:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding days
on which the Apple Valley Municipal Center is closed ("Holidays"). Generally, the Services shall
be completed within forty-eight (48) hours after receipt of a Work Order, excluding weekends
and Holidays.
1.5 Coordination. AHI shall coordinate its Services with the services provided by
others relative to the Project.
1.6 Failure to Pass Inspection. If any Project does not pass inspection, AHI shall
notify the contractor and the City of the specific findings of the inspection on the date of such
inspection.
1.7 Reporting. AHI shall prepare and submit to the appropriate authorities any and all
documents and information required by the City or by City ordinance, state law or federal law.
1.8 Ownership of Work Product. The work product of AHI's Services pursuant to
this Agreement, including all documents and information, shall be the property of the City.
Notwithstanding any provision in this Agreement to the contrary, the City shall not be obligated
to pay AHI for any Services under this Agreement until AHI delivers all related inspection
records and documents to the City.
1.9 Agreement Not Exclusive. This Agreement shall not preclude the City from
engaging any other person or entity to perform building inspections, nor shall this Agreement
preclude AHI from providing similar or related services for any other entity. However, the
particular services AHI performs for the City shall be for the exclusive benefit of the City and not
for the benefit of any other entity.
1.10 No Office Provided. AHI will supply its own office facility, if one is needed.
2. Indemnification and Insurance.
2.1 Indemnification. AHI shall indemnify, defend and hold City harmless from and
against all liabilities, claims, damages, losses and expense, including reasonable attorneys' fees,
arising out of or resulting from the performance of the Services.
2.2 Insurance. AHI shall keep and maintain the following insurance coverages:
2.2.1 Workers Compensation Insurance. AHI shall maintain workers compensation
insurance with following limits or with the minimum limits required by law, if greater:
Coverage A: Statutory
Coverage B: $1,000,000 Bodily Injury by accident Each accident
2
$1,000,000 Bodily Injury by disease Policy limit
$1,000,000 Bodily Injury by disease Each employee
2.2.2 General Liability Insurance. AHI shall maintain general liability insurance with
coverage to include: Premises/Operations, Completed Operations and Contractual Liability (to
cover the indemnification provision in paragraph 2.1 of this Agreement). Limits of coverage shall
not be less than:
$1,000,000 Per occurrence
$2,000,000 Aggregate
2.2.3 Automobile Insurance. AHI shall maintain automobile liability insurance to
include all owned autos (private passenger and other than private passenger), hired and
nonowned vehicles. Limits of coverage shall not be less than:
$500,000 Per occurrence
2.2.4 Errors and Omissions. AHI shall maintain errors and omissions/professional
liability insurance. The limit of coverage shall not be less than:
$250,000 Per occurrence
$500,000 Aggregate
2.2.5 Umbrella Insurance. AHI shall maintain umbrella/excess limits insurance in an
amount not less than $1,000,000.
2.3 Evidence of Insurance. The above insurance shall be maintained in companies
lawfully authorized to do business in Minnesota and which are reasonably acceptable to the City.
The City shall be listed as an additional insured on the insurance policies, excluding the workers'
compensation insurance policy. AHI shall furnish the City with certificates reflecting such
insurance (ACORD form or equivalent) to be in force as long as this agreement remains in effect
and providing that said insurance will not be canceled or materially changed without prior written
notice to City.
2.4 Health and Safety. AHI will take all necessary precautions, meet all legal
requirements for the health and safety of all its employees on the Project and all other persons
who may be affected by the Services. This requirement will apply continuously and is not limited
to normal working hours.
3. Responsibilities of City.
3.1 Compensation. City will pay compensation to AHI for the Services set forth in
each Work Order, together with any adjustments set forth in written Change Orders. The amount
of compensation shall be based on the hourly rate schedule of fees and expenses attached hereto
as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein. AHI shall submit itemized invoices not more than two
(2) times per month, listing the Work Order numbers and the corresponding date(s) of each task.
The City shall make payment to AHI within twenty (20) days after receipt of each invoice. AHI
shall be responsible for all other expenses, including, but not limited to, transportation, materials,
equipment, labor and insurance costs and tax obligations.
3
3.2 Administration. The City shall perform the following administrative functions in
connection with the Services, at the City's cost:
3.2.1 Issue permits;
3.2.2 Receive and schedule inspection requests;
3.2.3 Issue Work Orders and Change Orders;
3.2.4 Provide inspection documents;
3.2.5 Issue correction notices; and
3.2.6 Maintain inspection records.
4. Miscellaneous.
4.1 Entire Agreement. The terms and conditions set forth herein constitute the entire
understanding of the parties relating to the provision of the Services by AHI to the City and shall
be incorporated in all Work Orders unless otherwise so stated therein. This Agreement may be
amended only by a written instrument signed by both parties.
4.2 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. Any action to enforce this Agreement shall
be venued in Minnesota District Court in Dakota County, Minnesota.
4.3 Assignment Prohibited. This Agreement may not be assigned by AHI or the City
without the prior written consent of the other party.
4.4 Subcontracting Prohibited. AHI may not subcontract with any person or entity
for performance of any Services under this Agreement.
4.5 Term. The term of this Agreement shall commence on the date of execution of
this Agreement and shall expire on December 31, 2013, subject to renewal by the parties.
4.6 Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon seven (7) ,
days written notice should the other party fail to perform in accordance with the terms hereof,
provided such failure is not cured within such seven (7) day period. The City may terminate this
Agreement for convenience at any time, in which event AHI shall be compensated in accordance
with the terms hereof for Services performed and reimbursable expenses incurred prior to its
receipt of written notice of termination from City.
4.7 Force Majeure. Neither party shall be liable for damages or deemed in default of
this Agreement and any Work Order hereunder to the extent that any delay or failure in the
4
performance of its obligations (other than the payment of money) results, without its fault or
negligence, from any cause beyond its reasonable control, such as acts of God, acts of civil or
military authority, embargoes, epidemics, war, riots, insurrections, fires, explosions, earthquakes,
floods, adverse weather conditions, strikes or lock-outs, and changes in laws, statutes,
regulations, or ordinances.
4.8 Audit. Under Minn. Stat. §§ 6.551 and 16C.05, subd. 5, AHI's books, records,
documents, and accounting procedures and practices relevant to this Agreement are subject to
examination by the City, Legislative Auditor, and/or State Auditor, as appropriate, for a
minimum of six years from the end of this Agreement. AHI shall maintain its books, records and
documents for at least six (6) years.
4.9 Severability. Should a court of law determine that any clause or section of this
Agreement is invalid, all other clauses or sections shall remain in effect.
5
EXECUTED as of the day and year written below.
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
Date By
Mary Hamann-Roland, Mayor
Date And
Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
A TO Z HOME INSPECTION, LLC
Date By
Date And
STATE OF )
) SS.
COUNTY OF )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
, 2012, by and , the
and of ,
a [corporation/partnership], on behalf of the [corporation/partnership].
(Notarial Seal)
Notary Public
6
EXHIBIT "A"
Building Inspection Services
AV Project 2012-157
Schedule of Fees and Expenses
New Residential Inspection $50 per hour
Existing Residential inspection $50 per hour
•�•
•�s•
•s.•• . Z
•�s•
•as•
City of App�e
Va��ey MEMO
Parks and Recreation Department
7100 - 147 Street West
Apple Valley, MN 55124
952 / 953-2300
TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator
FROM: Tom Adamini, Interim Parks and Recreation Director
DATE: December 10, 2012
SUBJECT: Agreement with Flanagan Sales, Inc., for the Quarry Point Park Shade Structure
Strong winds of the June 2012 summer storm damaged the Quarry Point Park shade structure
and compromised its integrity. The approximate 100 ft. by 50 ft. structure was installed in 2010
over the park's playground equipment as a deterrent to foul balls hit from the nearby baseball
fields. It consisted of 6 inch diameter steel tube columns and 4 inch diameter beams between
columns. Fabric covered the entire structure.
During the dismantling, crews were able to salvage all of the structural footings except one.
With this in mind, a quotation provided by Flanagan Sales, Inc., lists structure replacement at
$45,498.01. Staff has worked extensively with the League of Minnesota Cities' insurance
representative to obtain insurance benefits covering the cost of replacement of the shade structure.
Flanagan Sa1es, Inc., supplied the original shade structure. Staff recommends contracting with
them for the replacement to capture the savings associated with reuse of the original footings.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Authorize staff to enter into a written agreement with Flanagan Sales, Inc., for the Quarry Point
Park Shade Structure in the amount of $45,498.01.
DMPM
H.•Adamini:Quotes:2012:Shade Structure autho memo.docx
CITY OF'APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA
AGREEMENT FOR RE-CONSTRUCTION OF
THE QUARRY POINT PARK SHADE STRUCTURE
CITYPROJECTNUMBER 2013-111
THIS AGREEMENT, made this 13th day of December, 2012, by and between the City of
Apple Valley, hereinafter called "City", and Flana�an Sales, Inc., hereinafter called "Contractor";
WITNESSETH, that the City and the Contractor, for the consideration hereinafter stated,
agree as follows:
l. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED
The Contractor hereby covenants and agrees to perform and execute all the provisions of
the proposal dated, December 5, 2012, and made a part of this Agreement by reference, for
furnishing of:
RE-CONSTRUCTION OF
THE QUARRY POINT PARK SHADE STRUCTURE
CITY PROJECT NUMBER 2013-111
and to do everything required by this Agreement.
2. COMPLETION DATE
The Contractor agrees that the work contemplated by this Agreement shall be fully and
satisfactorily completed on or before June 1, 2013.
3. CHANGE ORDERS
Any changes to the work specified by this Agreement shall be made in writing and signed
by both parties. Only the Parks Superintendent will have the authority to initiate any change
orders which must be submitted to the City Council for approval. No payment will be made for
any claim for additional charges not processed in this manner.
4. PAYMENT
The City agrees to pay and the Contractor agrees to receive and accept payment in
accordance with the prices bid as set forth in the copy of the accepted Proposal Form hereto
attached, the aggregate amount of which is $45,498.01. Upon completion of delivery and
installation by the Contractor and acceptance by the City, Contractor shall submit an invoice for
the lump sum of the aggregate amount. This invoice will be paid by the City within thirty (30)
days of receipt.
5. CONTRACTOR'S OBLIGATIONS TO SUBCONTRACTORS
The Contractor shall pay any subcontractor within ten days of the Contractor's receipt of
payment from the City for undisputed services provided by the subcontractor. The Contractor
shall pay interest of one and one-half (1-1/2%) percent per month or any part of a month to the
subcontractor on any undisputed amount not paid on time pursuant to this provision to the
subcontractor. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of one
hundred ($100.00) dollars or more shall be ten ($10.00) dollars. For an unpaid balance of less
than one hundred ($100.00) dollars, the Contractor shall pay the actual penalty due under this
provision to the subcontractor. A subcontractor who prevails in a civil action to collect interest
penalties from the Contractor shall be awarded its costs and disbursements, including attorneys'
fees, incurred in bringing this action.
6. 1NSURANCE
Contractor shall not commence work under this Agreement until it has obtained all
insurance required under this section and shall have filed the certificate of insurance or the
certified copy of the insurance policy with the City. Each insurance policy shall contain a clause
providing that it shall not be canceled by the insurance company without thirty (30) days written
notice to the City of the intent to cancel. Minimum requirements:
A. Worker's compensation insurance and employer's liability insurance as required by
law.
B. Contractor's comprehensive general and automobile liability insurance, including
coverage for non-owned and hired vehicles, in limits as follows:
General Liability - Bodily Injury -$500,000 each occurrence
- $500,000 completed operations
Property Damage - $100,000
OR
Combined Single Limit -$500,000 each occurrence
- $500,000 aggregate
2
Automobile Liability - Bodily Injury -$250,000 each person
- $500,000 each occurrence
Property Damage - $100,000 each occurrence
- $200,000 aggregate
OR
Combined Single Limit - $500,000
C. The City of Apple Valley shall be listed as an additional insured on the above
policies.
In addition to all listed coverages, Contractor shall procure and maintain an Umbrella or Excess
liability policy in a minimum limit of $1,000,000.
7. INDEMNIFICATION
The Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, agents and
employees from and against all claims, damages, losses or expenses, including attorney fees,
which may be suffered or for which they may be held liable, arising out of or resulting from the
assertion against them of any claims, debts or obligations in consequence of the performance of
this Agreement by the Contractor, its employees, agents or subcontractors, whether or not caused
in part by a party indemnified hereunder. Contractor shall comply with all applicable Laws and
Regulations relating to the safety of persons or property, or to the protection of persons or
property from damage, injury, or loss.
8. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS
The contract documents shall include the following documents, as if fully set forth herein,
and the Contractor acknowledges familiarity with said documents:
A. This Agreement
B. Proposal Form
C. Certificate of Insurance
9. WHOLE AGREEMENT
This Agreement embodies the entire agreement between the parties including all prior
understanding and agreements and may not be modified except in writing signed by all the
parties.
3
EXECUTED as of the day and year written below.
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
Date By
Mary Hamann-Roland, Mayor
Date And
Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk
FLANAGAN SALES, INC.
Date By
Date And
STATE OF )
) SS.
COUNTY OF )
On this day of , 2012, before me personally appeared
and , to me known who, being
by me duly sworn, did say that they are respectively the and
of , that the seal affixed to
the foregoing instrument is the corporate seal of said corporation and that said instrument was
executed in behalf of the corporation by authority of its Board of Directors, and said officers
acknowledged the instrument to be the free act and deed of said corporation.
(Notarial Seal)
Notary Public
� F��nag�.n
' � � r � 5 , � ,� � .
�
i�'''� � .:
�
�
PROPOSAL
To: City of Apple Valley Date: December 5, 2012
Parks and Recreation Department
14603 Hayes Road Contact: Tom Adamini
Apple Valley, MN 55124 Phone: 952-953-2420
CeIL•
Project: Sun Shade at Quarry park Fax:
Email: TAdamini@ci.apple-valley.mn.us
We are pleased to provide the following quotation on items supplied by See Below
Qty Item Description Unit Price Extension
Option A Completely New Sun Ports Sun Shade Structure
1 SunPorts Steel and Fabric Sun Shade Structure -(2) $32,923.00
40ft. x 40ft. Hip Sections with Joined Triangle 40ft. x 40ft.
x 55ft. Section - 12' Entry, 7 Posts and Steel Framing.
1 Concrete footing with re-bar per specifications. $1,850.00
Note: After closer inspection of all footings in the spring by
Flanagan Sales and the City of Apple Valley other footings
may need to be replaced at $1,850.00 each.
1 Removal of existing structure and installation of completely $5,950.00
new structure and fabric.
* Above based on Manufacturer's Standard Warranty Sub Total $40,723.00
Freight $2,350.00
Tax 6.875% $2,425.01
Total $45,498.01
IMPORTANT /NFORMATION:
♦ Quotation is valid for: 30 Days
♦ Freight based on shipment to Apple Valley, MN
♦ Shipment can currently be made in 3- 4 Weeks upon order entry
♦ Terms: Based on credit approval -down payment may be req.
♦ Pricing based on above quantities — any changes may require a revised quotation.
♦ Orders will be placed upon receipt of a Purchase Order or your signed acceptance of this quotation.
. Purchase Orders should be made aut to Flanagan Sales, Inc.
Thank You! Flanagan Sales, �nc. MGIe� .ADYSeli/
Project Manager
ACCEPTED BY: DATE:
2475 Maplewood Drive • Suite 114 • St. Paul • Minnesota • 55109
Phone: 651.633.0123 • 1.800.328.3557 • Fax: 651.633.1515 • E-mail: wecanhelp@flanagansales.com
.
� � 1 a� n. a g a ar�.
S a I e�, 1 t� �: .
��,, �"� � '
_ � �- ��
Flanagan Sales, Inc. greatly appreciates your consideration of our proposal. If it is your
desire to purchase any or all of the items listed in this proposal, we kindly ask that you
sign your acceptance on both pages of this quotation and complete the following
information to insure timely and accurate order entry.
Bill to address: (if different from quote) Ship to address: (if different from quote)
� City of Apple Valley Quarrv Point Park
7100 — 147th Street West 15725 Pilot Knob Road
Apple Valley, MN 55124 Apple Valley, MN 55124
Delivery Contact: Tom Adamini — Parks Superintendent
Phone Number(s): 952-953-2420
Desired Delivery Date:
* Please Note: Many factors are involved in the manufacturer's actual ship dates. We will
make every attempt to accommodate your preferred date.
Purchase Order # (if applicable):
* Please Note: Purchase orders to be made out to Flanagan Sales, Inc.
Is this project exempt from sales tax? n�
'" If YES, please include a completed Certi�cafe of Exemption
Color Selections (if applicable):
Additional Comments:
Delivery and installation to be completed by June 1, 2013.
Terms:
O I/ We understand that all accounts are payable to Flanagan Sales Inc. according to the terms shown on each invoice, and
if not paid on or before said date, are then delinquent. I/ We agree to pay any potential service charges added to past due
invoices. Terms are based upon credit approval.
O Unless notified in writing to the contrary, all charges are due and payable in full at:
Flanagan Sales, Inc. 2475 Maplewood Drive - Suite 114, St. Paul, MN 55109
O Additional charges may apply for applicable sales tax, extra unloading time, incorrect delivery addresses, and/or
cancellation of delivery without 48 hours prior notice.
O The Terms and Conditions of this signed quotation shall prevail over any inconsistent terms and conditions of a purchase
order, contract and / or confirmation related to this project. •
ACCEPTED BY: DATE:
2475 Maplewood Drive • Suite 114 • St: Paul • Minnesota • 55109
Phone: 651.633.0123 • 1.800.328.3557 • Fax: 651.633.1515 • E-mail: wecanhelp@flanagansales.com
... y. Q 3
:.�:. �
....
...
� City of AI�VaIIev
MEMO
Public Works Department
TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administratar
FROM: Gregory P. Brady, Building Official
DATE: December 13, 2012
SUBJECT: AGREEMENT FOR AV PROJECT 2013-112, ELECTRICAL INSPECTION
SERVICES 2013-2014
Attached far your consideration is a Professional Services Agreement with Midwest Electrical
Technologies, Inc. (MET) for Inspection of Electrical Installations. This agreement is the result
of a Request for Proposal which was sent out to four qualified entities earlier this year. The
agreement is to take effect on January 1, 2013.
Bringing electrical permits to the local level the past two years has benefited Apple Valley with
improved customer service, a consistent electrical inspection process, and a shortened turnaround
time for permit applications. Electrical inspection records are now maintained at the City instead
of at the State. Feedback from the general public has been positive.
The proposed contract requires that MET provide electrical inspections and guidance for permit
holders. MET would provide their own vehicle, and maintain insurance coverage and workers
compensation insurance. The City of Apple Valley would perform the administrative functions of
issuing electrical permits, providing correction notices and maintaining permit records.
A fee schedule has been established based on the State of Minnesota Fees and are similar to those
charged in the cities of Burnsville, Lakeville, and Rosemount. Permit applications are available in
both electronic and paper form.
Recommended Action:
Approve Agreement with Midwest Electrical Technologies, Inc., for AV Project 2013-112, Electrical
Inspection Services 2013-2014.
c: Todd Blomstrom
Attachment
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
FOR INSPECTION OF ELECTRICAL INSTALLATIONS
THIS AGREEMENT is made this 13th day of December, 2012, by and between the City
of Apple Valley, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and MIDWEST ELECTRICAL
TECHNOLOGIES, Inc., a Minnesota corporation ("MET"), to set forth the terms and conditions
pursuant to which MET may, from time to time, provide City with professional services (the
"Services") consisting of inspection of electrical installations within the City of Apple Valley
(each individually a "Project").
The contract documents that comprise the entire agreement between City and MET
concerning the Services consist of this Agreement, the Work Orders, insurance policies, change
orders; and additional documents specific to the particular Project, as listed in the Work Orders,
and together they set forth the terms and conditions under which MET will provide City with the
Services described therein.
In consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, City and MET
hereby agree as follows:
1. Responsibilities of MET.
l.l Services. City may, in its sole discretion, from time to time request MET to
perform professional services pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. City will authorize such
Services by executing a Work Order specifying the Project and the date for completion of the
Services. Upon receipt of a signed Work Order, MET shall perform the Services pursuant to the
terms of the Work Order and this Agreement. City may order changes to the Work Order
consisting of additions, deletions or other revisions, which shall be authorized by written Change
Order. If MET is unwilling or unable to perform the requested Services, MET shall promptly
notify City's representative who authorized the Services. City's representatives with individual
authority to execute Wark Orders and Change Orders are the Building Official and the Public
Works Director for the City of Apple Valley.
1.2 Performance Standards. MET shall provide its Services in a professional
manner that is consistent with the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar
circumstances by reputable members of its profession practicing in the same locality. MET shall
comply with all applicable laws, regulations and ordinances and with inspection procedures
established by the City.
1.3 Qualifications of Electrical Inspectors. MET represents and warrants to City
that every person performing Services under this Agreement shall meet the following
qualifications: pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 326B.36, Subd. 6, each electrical inspector shall be a
licensed master or journeyman electrician under Minn. Stat. § 326B.33, Subd. 1, paragraph (1),
or Subd. 2, paragraph (b), and shall not otherwise engage or be employed in the sale, installing,
altering, or repairing of electrical wiring, apparatus, or equipment for light, heat, power, and
other purposes and shall have no financial interest in any concern engaged in any such business.
1.4 Time for Performance of Services. MET shall perform the Services in each
Work Order in the sequence and time specified in the Work Order and as otherwise required by
the progress and nature of the Project. An electrical inspector employed by MET shall be
available to respond by telephone and email to permit applicants between 7:00 a.m. and 8:30
a.m., Monday through Friday, and perform the Services as needed between 8:30 a.m. and 4:00
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding days on which the Apple Valley Municipal Center is
closed ("Holidays"). Generally, the Services shall be completed within forty-eight (48) hours
after receipt of a Work Order, excluding weekends and Holidays.
1.5 Coordination. MET shall coordinate its Services with the services provided by
others relative to the Project.
1.6 Failure to Pass Inspection. If any Project does not pass inspection, MET shall
notify the contractor, the property owner and the City of the specific findings of the inspection on
the date of such inspection, and perform follow-up inspections as needed to obtain compliance.
1.7 Reporting. MET shall prepare and submit to the appropriate authorities any and
all documents and information required by the City or by City ordinance, state law or federal law.
1.8 Ownership of Work Product. The work product of MET's Services pursuant to
this Agreement, including all documents and information, shall be the property of City.
Notwithstanding any provision in this Agreement to the contrary, the City shall not be obligated
to pay MET for any Services under this Agreement until MET delivers all related inspection
records and documents to the City.
1.9 Agreement Not Exclusive. This Agreement shall not preclude the City from
engaging any other person or entity to perform inspection of electrical installations, nor shall this
Agreement preclude MET from providing similar or related services for any other entity.
However, the particular services MET performs for the City shall be for the exclusive benefit of
the City and not for the benefit of any other entity.
1.10 No Office Provided. MET will supply its own office facility, if one is needed.
2. Indemnification and Insurance.
2.1 Indemnification. MET shall indemnify, defend and hold City harmless from and
against all liabilities, claims, damages, losses and expense, including reasonable attorneys' fees,
arising out of or resulting from the performance of the Services.
2.2 Insurance. MET shall keep and maintain the following insurance coverages:
2.2.1 Workers Compensation Insurance. MET shall maintain workers compensation
insurance with following limits or with the minimum limits required by law, if greater:
Coverage A: Statutory
Coverage B: $1,000,000 Bodily Injury by accident Each accident
$1,000,000 Bodily Injury by disease Policy limit
$1,000,000 Bodily Injury by disease Each employee
2
2.2.2 General Liability Insurance. MET shall maintain general liability insurance with
coverage to include: Premises/Operations, Completed Operations and Contractual Liability (to
cover the indemnification provision in paragraph 2.1 of this Agreement). Limits of coverage shall
not be less than:
$1,000,000 Per occurrence
$2,000,000 Aggregate
2.2.3 Automobile Insurance. MET shall maintain automobile liability insurance to
include all owned autos (private passenger and other than private passenger), hired and
nonowned vehicles. Limits of coverage shall not be less than:
$500,000 Per occurrence
2.2.4 Errors and Omissions. MET shall maintain errors and omissions/professional
liability insurance. The limit of coverage shall not be less than $1,000,000.
2.2.5 Umbrella Insurance. MET shall maintain umbrellalexcess limits insurance in an
amount not less than $1,000,000.
2.3 Evidence of Insurance. The above insurance shall be maintained in companies
lawfully authorized to do business in Minnesota and which are reasonably acceptable to City.
The City shall be listed as an additional insured on the insurance policies, excluding the workers'
compensation insurance policy. MET shall furnish City with certificates reflecting such insurance
(ACORD form or equivalent) to be in force as long as this agreement remains in effect and
providing that said insurance will not be canceled or materially changed without prior written
notice to City.
2.4 Health and Safety. MET will take all necessary precautions, meet all legal
requirements for the health and safety of all its employees on the Project and all other persons
who may be affected by the Services. This requirement will apply continuously and is not limited
to normal working hours.
3. Responsibilities of City.
3.1 Compensation. City will pay compensation to MET for the Services set forth in
each Work Order, together with any adjustments set forth in written Change Orders, after the
Project passes final electrical inspection. The amount of compensation shall be equal to seventy
percent (70%) of the corresponding electrical permit fees, excluding any City administrative fees
and state surcharges. MET shall submit itemized invoices not more than two (2) times per
month, listing the Work Order numbers and the corresponding date(s) that each Project passed
final electrical inspection. City shall make payment to MET within twenty (20) days a$er receipt
of each invoice. MET shall be responsible for all other expenses, including, but not limited to,
transportation, materials, equipment, labor and insurance costs and tax obligations.
3.2 Administration. The City shall perform the following administrative functions in
connection with the Services, at the City's cost:
3
3.2.1 Issue electrical permits;
3.2.2 Receive inspection requests;
3.2.3 Issue Work Orders and Change Orders;
3.2.4 Provide inspection approval stickers;
3.2.5 Issue correction notices; and
3.2.6 Maintain inspection records.
4. Miscellaneous.
4.1 Entire Agreement. The terms and conditions set forth herein constitute the entire
understanding of the parties relating to the provision of the Services by MET to City and shall be
incorporated in all Work Orders unless otherwise so stated therein. This Agreement may be
amended only by a written instrument signed by both parties.
4.2 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. Any action to enforce this Agreement shall
be venued in Minnesota District Court in Dakota County, Minnesota.
4.3 Assignment Prohibited. This Agreement may not be assigned by MET or City
without the prior written consent of the other party.
4.4 Subcontracting Prohibited. MET may not subcontract with any person or entity
for performance of any Services under this Agreement.
4.5 Term. The term of this Agreement shall commence on the date of execution of
this Agreement and shall expire on December 31, 2014, subject to renewal by the parties.
4.6 Termination. This Ageement may be terminated by either party upon seven (7)
days written notice should the other party fail to perform in accordance with the terms hereof,
provided such failure is not cured within such seven (7) day period. City may terminate this
Agreement for convenience at any time, in which event MET shall be compensated in accordance
with the terms hereof for Services performed and reimbursable expenses incurred prior to its
receipt of written notice of termination from City.
4.7 Force Majeure. Neither party shall be liable for damages or deemed in default of
this Agreement and any Work Order hereunder to the extent that any delay or failure in the
performance of its obligations (other than the payment of money) results, without its fault or
negligence, from any cause beyond its reasonable control, such as acts of God, acts of civil or
military authority, embargoes, epidemics, war, riots, insurrections, fires, explosions, earthquakes,
floods, adverse weather conditions, strikes or lock-outs, and changes in laws, statutes,
regulations, or ordinances.
4
4.8 Audit. Under Minn. Stat. §§ 6.551 and 16C.05, subd. 5, MET's books, records,
documents, and accounting procedures and practices relevant to this Agreement are subject to
examination by the City, Legislative Auditor, and/or State Auditor, as appropriate, for a
minimum of six years from the end of this Agreement. MET shall maintain its books, records
and documents for at least six (6) years.
4.9 Severability. Should a court of law determine that any clause or section of this
Agreement is invalid, all other clauses or sections shall remain in effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and MET have caused this Agreement to be duly
executed.
MIDWEST ELECTRICAL TECHNOLOGIES, Inc.
By: Michael J. Hawke Date
Its:
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
By: Mary Hamann-Roland Date
Its: Mayor
By: Pamela J. Gackstetter Date
Its: City Clerk
5
�-�.�
...
....
� ::
...
City of App�e
Va��e MEMO
Public Works Department
TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator
.
FROM: Dean Jacobson, Public Works Supervisor
DATE: December 13, 2012
SUBJECT: CONTRACT FOR AV PROJECT 2013-108, ELECTRIC GENERATOR
EMISSIONS IMPROVEMENTS
The City of Apple Valley owns and operates three large electric generators that are used to provide
both emergency and non-emergency power. The generators are located at the Municipal Center,
Central Maintenance Facility, and Municipal Well No. 10. Dakota Electric uses these generators
approximately eight times per year for non-emergency load management to shed approximately
1,000 Kw during peak power demand within the community, typically during the hottest days of
the year.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency recently instituted new mandates governing air quality
of emissions for generators that are used for non-emergency purposes (peak shaving) under EPA
40 CFR Part 63, Subpart ZZZZ. The three generators described above must be modified with
additional equipment to meet the new federal mandates if we are to continue using them for non-
emergency purposes. City staff has determined that the cost of the equipment modifications is less
than the savings realized by lower electric utility rates from Dakota Electric when providing non-
emergency load shedding with the generators.
Earlier this fall, City staff solicited separate quotations from four companies to complete the
necessary modifications to the three electric generator units described above. Two companies
submitted quotes for the project. The results are provided below:
Quote Gen. 1 Quote Gen. 2 Quote Gen. 3
Companv Name (Municipal Center) _�CMF� �Well 10�
NAC Mechanical &
Electical Services, Ina $35,500 $33,800 $26,340
Ziegler Power Systems $42,434 $41,462 $28,785
Staff recommends that the City award the contract to NAC Mechanical & Electrical Services, Inc.
for Generator No. 1 and No. 3 at this time. Staff is seeking a six month extension for Generator No.
2 to allow this work to be completed with the Water Treatment Plant Project. NAC has completed
similar generator modification work for other communities within the metro area. Funding for the
project can be allocated as described below:
Gen. 1(Municipal Center) General Govt. Buildings $35,500
Gen. 3(Well 10) Public Works Water Utility $26,340
If the EPA does not grant an extension by December 23, 2012, Staff will request the award of
Generator No. 2 at the City Council meeting on December 27, 2012.
Recommended Action:
Approve Contract with NAC Mechanical & Electrical Services, Inc., for AV Project 2013-108,
Electric Generator Emissions Improvements, in the Amount of $61,740.
c: Todd Blomstrom
AGREEMENT FORM
ELECTRIC GENERATOR EMISSIONS IMPROVEMENTS
CITY PROJECT NUMBER 2013-108
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA
This Agreement ("Agreement") is made this 13th day of December, 2012, by and between NAC
Mechanical & Electrical Services„ Inc., (hereinafter called the "CONTRACTOR"), and the City
of Apple Valley, a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter called the "OWNER") (Owner
and Contractor are hereinafter called the "PARTIES");
WITNESSETH, that the OWNER and the CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter
stated, agree as follows:
l. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED
The CONTRACTOR hereby covenants and agrees to perform and execute all the provisions
of the Contract Documents (identified in Section 8 of this Agreement) prepared by the Owner
dated February 10, 2012, and made a part of this Agreement by reference, for the following
improvement(s):
ELECTRIC GENERATOR EMISSIONS IMPROVEMENTS
CITYPROJECT NUMBER 2013-108
(the "Work")
The CONTRACTOR shall do everything required of this Agreement and the Contract
Documents. The CONTRACTOR shall make good, replace, and renew at its own cost and
expense any loss or damage to said Work and adjacent properties and facilities during the
performance of the Work or prior to the final acceptance thereof by the OWNER, and shall
be wholly responsible for the performance and completion of such Work.
2. COMPLETION DATE
The CONTRACTOR shall commence Work under this Agreement within ten (10) calendar
days after issuance of written Notice to Proceed and shall complete the Work in accordance
with Special Provisions to the General Conditions of the Contract Documents. The
CONTRACTOR shall notify the ENGINEER in writing of any and all causes of delay of
such Work or any part thereof, within three (3) days of the beginning of such delay.
3. CHANGE ORDERS
Any changes to the Work specified by this Agreement shall be made in writing and signed by
the PARTIES. Only the Engineer will have the authority to initiate any change orders which
must be submitted to the City Council for approval. No payment will be made for any claim
for additional charges not processed in this manner.
A-1
4. PAYMENT
The OWNER shall pay the CONTRACTOR for the performance of this Agreement
according to the Proposal Form, attached hereto, listing the schedule of approximate
quantities and unit prices as set out in the Proposal Form of the Contract Documents
submitted by the CONTRACTOR on December 4, 2012, the aggregate of which is estimated
to be $95,640.
5. INSURANCE, PERFORMANCE BOND AND PAYMENT BOND
This Agreement shall be in full force and effect after execution hereof upon the filing and
acceptance of the insurance documents as required in the Contract Documents. Said
insurance documents shall be issued in accordance with the provisions of Section 4 of the
General Conditions, thereby assuring that the OWNER has been named as an additional
insured party on all such policies or has been provided separate insurance policies of the kind
and amount stated therein.
6. INDEMNIFICATION
The CONTRACTOR shall indemnify and hold harmless the OWNER and its officers, agents
and employees from and against all claims, damages, losses or expenses, including attorney
fees, which may be suffered or for which they may be held liable, arising out of or resulting
from the assertion against them of any claims, debts or obligations in consequence of the
performance of this Agreement by the CONTRACTOR, its employees, agents or
subcontractors, whether or not caused in part by a party indemnified hereunder.
CONTRACTOR shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations relating to the safety
of persons or property, or to the protection of persons or property from damage, injury, or
loss.
7. CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATION
In order to induce OWNER to enter into this Agreement, CONTRACTOR makes the
following representations: CONTRACTOR has examined and carefully studied the Contract
Documents; CONTRACTOR has visited the Project identified in the Contract Documents
and become familiar with and is satisfied as to the general, local, and Project conditions that
may affect cost, progress, and performance of the Work; CONTRACTOR is familiar with
and is satisfied as to all federal, state, and local laws and regulations that may affect cost,
progress, and performance of the Work; and the CONTRACTOR does not consider that any
further examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, or data are necessary for the
performance of the Work in accordance with the other terms and conditions of the Contract
Documents.
A-2
8. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS
The Contract Documents shall consist of the following component parts:
A. The Contract (this Agreement)
B. Proposal Form
C. General Conditions
D. Certificate of Insurance
E. Addendum (s)
F. Notice of Award
G. Change Orders
H. Field Orders
This Agreement, together with the documents hereinabove mentioned, form the Contract for the
Work.
9. WHOLE AGREEMENT
This Agreement embodies the entire agreement between the PARTIES including all prior
understanding and agreements and may not be modified except in writing signed by all the
PARTIES.
A-3
EXECUTED as of the day and year written below.
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
Date By
Mary Hamann-Roland, Mayor
Date And
Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
NAC MECHANICAL &
ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC.
Date By
Date And
STATE OF )
) SS.
COUNTY OF )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
, 20_, by and , the
and of ,
a [corporation/partnership], on behalf of the [corporation/partnership].
(Notarial Seal)
Notary Public
A-4
.,. �- Q.5
...,
.....
....
...
City of App�e
Valley MEMO
Finance Department
TO: Mayor, City Council, and
Tom Lawell, City Administrator
FROM: Ron Hedberg, Finance Director
DATE: September 24, 2012
SUBJECT: Authorize Agreement with Northland Securities to Analyze Request from IMH far
Tax Increment Assistance
Introduction
Staff is seeking authorization to enter into an additional Financial Planning Agreement with
Northland Securities for analysis of the IMH TIF District request. Northland Securities, Inc. has
served as the City's financial advisor for these types of analysis for the City of Apple Valley in
the past.
Discussion
IMH has submitted a proposal requesting TIF assistance in the development of the IMH parcels
located in the Legacy area near Kelley Park. The City and IMH previously entered into a
memorandum of understanding that identified their intent to submit a request for TIF assistance
and the creation of a TIF district for this development. IMH has paid to the city a second deposit
of $25,000 to reimburse the city's costs associated with the review and �processing of the request.
The Financial Planning Agreement with Northland Securities includes a not to exceed amount of
$6,000.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends entering into the Financial Planning Agreement with Northland Securities for
analysis of the IMH TIF District request in an amount not to exceed $6,000. The cost for this
analysis is covered by the financial escrow received from IMH.
Action Requested:
Approve entering into the Financial Planning Agreement with Northland Securities for analysis
of the IMH TIF District request in an amount not to exceed $6,000 subject to City Attorney
review and approvaL
FINANCIAL PLANNING AGREEMENT
BY AND BETWEEN
THE CITY OF APFLE VALLEY, MN
AND
NORTHLAND SECURITIES, INC.
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT (PARKSIDE VILLAGE)
This Agreement made and entered into by and between the City of Apple Valley, Minnesota
(hereinafter "Client") and Northland Securities, Inc., of Minneapolis, Minnesota (hereinafter
��NSI").
WTTNESSETH
WHEREAS, the Client desires to use the services of NSI for financial planning assistance related
the establishrnent of a new housing development tax increment financing district and
negotiation of an agreement with the Developer.
WHEREAS, NSI desires to furnish services to the Client as hereinafter described.
N(JW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties as follows:
SEItVICES TO BE PROVIDED BY NSI
The scope of work will undertake the process to assist the Client with financial analysis and
review of terms for reaching agreement with housing developer on the new housing
development. Legal services to draft and review the agreements are not provided by NSI and
are not subjeet to this agreement. NSI will provide the following services:
l. Collect financial information from housing developer, including capital costs, rents and
other income, and operating expenses.
2. Update information on delinquent special assessments and property taxes and penalties
and interest and payments made by developer and assist with review of data to inform
discussion the developer on terms for agreement.
3. Update capital pro forrna and operating income pro forma for proposed housing
development using updated information provided by developer, informaiion collected
on delinquent special assessments and property taxes and penalties and interest,
information available from the Client for outstanding future special assessments
payable, and information provided by Client an development fees.
4. Provide memorandum on justification ("but for") to inform Client's considerati�n of
public financial assistance for the housing development.
5. Prepare tax increment estimates for payment to on tax increment note and loan.
6. Assist with the structure of tax increment note and loan.
7. Attend meetings with Client to review information and tax increment estimates.
8. Attend and assist with facilitation of discussion at public hearing(s).
�
Ta,r Increment Financing and Agreement for Parkside Village Page T
1
�
COMPENSATION
The budget for undertaking the tasks in this agreement is an amount not to exceed $6,dd0. This
amount includes all NSI services to assist with preparatian and negotiation of the development
agreement, potential business subsidy agreement, and purchase agreement anct to participate in
the public hearing. Northland will bill the Client on a monthly basis for services performed and
actual reimbursable expenses (publication, printing, and mailing). Staff time will be billed
according to the following schedule:
Senior Professional .....................................................:.... $160/hour
Professional...................................................................... $135/hour
Support.............................................................................. $105/hour
ASSIGINED NORTHLAND EMPLOYEE
The NSI employees responsible for providing services pursuant to this agreement and for the
services performed are Tammy Omdal and Rusty Fifield.
SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS
The terms and provisions of this Agreement are binding upon and inure to the benefit of the
Client and NSI and their successors or assigns.
DISCLAIMER
In performing service under this agreement, NSI is relying on the accur�cy of information
provided by the developer and the Client and the services provided by Northland are based on
current State Law. The parties agree that the Iviinnesota property tax system and other laws
may change and may affect the accuracy and validity of services provided by NSI. NSI will
perform its work using the best available information. The Client recognizes and accepts that
future property values, tax levies and tax rates may vary from the assumptions used by NSI and
such changes may affect the work product produced and provided by NSI.
TERM OF THIS AGREEMENT
This Agreement may be terminated by thirty (30) days written notice by either the Client or
NSI. In the event of early termination by the Client, NSI shall provide the Client with an
itemized hourly statement of services already provided. All hi�lable hours by NSI shall be
billed at the stated hourly rates should early termination occur.
Dated this _ day of . 2012.
Northland Securities, Inc. City of Apple Valley, MN
By: -.� � ��-�- g
Y�
Senior Vice President
Title
f
Tax Inerement Finaneing and Agreement for Parkside Village Page 2
... �-�-. R .1
....
.....
....
....
City of App�e
Va��ey MEMO
Public Works Department
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administratar
FROM: Michael Glewwe, Public Works Superintendent
DATE: December 13, 2012
SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE AND FINAL PAYMENT ON CONTRACT WITH RON
KASSA CONSTRUCTION, INC., FOR AV PROJECT 2012-119, 2012
CONCRETE REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT SERVICES
On June 14, 2012, City Council approved an agreement with Ron Kassa Construction, Inc., in the
amount of $18,000 for concrete removal and replacement services: Ron Kassa Construction has
completed work per the ageement. This work was done at various locations in the City to
sidewalks in need of repair. The improvements have been inspected and found to be acceptable for
final payment.
Repairs included sidewalks damaged during the June 8 storm, where storm damaged trees lifted
sidewalk sections. Additional work was also completed on pedestrian ramps as part of the
Flagstaff Avenue Extension. The Contractor completed this work at the contract unit price in the
agreement dated June 14, 2012. This additional work added $9,200.10 to the total Contract.
Project funding is available from the 2012 Public Works Street Maintenance operations budget.
Recommended Action:
Approve Acceptance and Final Payment on Agreement with Ron Kassa Construction, Inc., for
AV Project 2012-119, 2012 Concrete Removal and Replacement Services in the amount of
$2,698.20.
MG:dsm
Attachments
c: Todd Blomstrom
PAYMENT VOUCHER #4
2012 Concrete Removal and Replacement Services
AV Project 2072-119
For Period Ending: December 13, 2012
OWNER: CONTRACTOR:
City of Apple Valley Ron Kassa Construction, Inc.
7100 147th Street West 6005 125th St. E.
Apple Valley, MN 55124 Elko, MN 55020
Phone: 952-461-3715
Amount of Contract: $18,000.00
Total Amount $18,000.00
Contract Value
Amount of Work Less Net
Account Per Agreement Certified Less Previous Amount
Number June 14 20�2 To Date Retained Payments Due
Streets Division �s10-s2as $18,000.00 $27,200.10 $0.00 $24,501.90 $2,698.20
Subtotal $18,000.00 $27,200.10 $2,698.20
Total 18 000.00 27 200.10 2 698.20
Date: �— 7 '�� �!��� .
�—
ublic Works Superinte e treets
Date: I z• o� i z-- "" ^
v� /`t- •
Publi Works Director
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA
APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT
DATE: _I � t f - � �,, FOR PERIOD: I � - / � �- I �
PROJECT: �C' I �..-) � �j �,C71 a, �,�� �^,�,¢� �,�- � From � a-- To ., i 6l a--
CONTRACTOR: �,c� ICCtis Sc� C,�� ��'Y�,�c:�� REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO. 7'
ADDRESS: �� (� � �� (��' ��- • f :
� I lc..c� � �1`1 �;' 'S'v c;�2� '
SUMMARY: �
� 1. Original ContractAmount . $ �����
2. Change Order - ADDITION $
3. Change Order - DEDUCTION $
4. Revised Contract Amount �
5. Total Completed and Stored to Date $�? at�� , 1�
6. Less Retainage % �
. 7. Total Earned Less Retainage �
8. Less Amount Paid Previously - � `'�� � � � � (�
9. AMOUNT DUE THIS CURRENT REQUEST $�(� g�, �.�
The undersigned Contractor certifies that to the best of his knowledge, information and belief,
the work covered by this application for payment has been completed in accordance with the
contract documents, that all amounts have been paid by him for work for which previous
payments were received from the City and that current ayment s own herein is now due.
Contractor: ` G'� �9 C��;�'�'`d�y'� t ��
-�`
By:
Recommended for Payment
/�
BY� �' � ATTACH ITEMIZED INVOICE
Title: D�'
Date: / 2 • �� � /'Z.
�i.on
SaasS�t
INVOtCE
Construction In:c.
��
6005 .- 250th `Street East • ElkO; MIV 55020 `_
Business 952-461�715 Residence : 952-461,3T13 ��, .� / � ._� �
Mobile 612-978 7254 � Fax 952-461-3716 DBte 1
_�.
Sotd To � ��7' �X.� ; . t� '
Dei. Temss:
A�ress:
C'dY �*a__�•^ pef;
Remarkx � p�� .
Q��Y Stxk Nur�rber/ Des�ip6on . Price per qr�oun;
, � �� .�-. i7 � r � r �,� �y� �d � ��
6�'
2 �� � �� q� �a.� �
3 ��� " 1� z-- 4 6 � �`/s�
4 � = � 7 � �° �3�
�
5 � . �N''�" ��►'►1�._ % �r�. �' � .. � ��Q
6
7'
8
9
10
11
t2
13
14
Sub Tatal
Sales Tax
T� �� �'
��
Ba1. Oue � ! � '�
... � . � . 2
....
.....
,...
..,
City of App�e
Va��ey MEMO
Parks and Recreation Department
7100 - 147"' Street West �
Apple Valley, MN 55124
� � � 952 / 953-2300
TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator
FROM: Tom Adamini, Interim Parks and Recreation Director
DATE: November 29, 2012
SUBJECT: Acceptance and Final Payment on Contract with Flanagan Sales, Inc., for Outdoor
Aluminum Bleachers
A contract agreement was awarded to Flanagan Sales, Inc., in August 2012, for Outdoor
Aluminum Bleachers. The bleachers are replacements for those damaged at Quarry Point Park and
Johnny Cake Ridge Park during the June 2012 storm.
Attached is a copy of Flanagan Sales, Inc.'s, application for payment. A claim was submitted to
the League of Minnesota Cities insurance and has been approved for coverage.
The bleachers have been delivered and set up per the contract arrangements. Staff finds them
acceptable and recommends final payrnent to Flanagan Sales, Inc., to complete the agreement.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Motion to accept the Outdoor Aluminum Bleachers as delivered and authorize final payment to
Flanagan, Sales, Inc., in the amount of $52,445.44.
DMPM
H.Adamini:Quotes:2012:0utdoorAlumintrm B[eachersfinal pymt.clocz �
� `
�
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA
APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT
DATE: /D °�0 °- �-U/�- FOR PERIOD:
PROJECT: �I�ctGl�e v I�e,o ��t Gerv�•� F FROM: TO:
CONTRRCTOR: �la/°��'G�r cS�-� S IYtc- REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO.
ADDRESS: �`�7S I'litrx.�/.c f.JOocf �v, ��f�- 1l �/
�S �a-.�t ( t'l�t nI �s I D `3 _
SUMMARY:
1. Original Contract Amount $ ��, ��5 • `��/
2. Change Order - ADDITION $ !.� • d�
3. Change Order - DEDUCTION $ C� . DO
4. Revised Contract Amount $ a �� `�
5. Total Completed and Stored to Date $ J`��, �5. ��{
6. Less Retainage �% $ d• a�
7. Total Earned Less Retainage $ N��
8. Less Amount Paid Previously $ N/�
9. AMOUNT DUE THIS CURRENT REQUEST $ J��� �`��• ��
The undersigned Contractor certifies that to the best of his knowledge, information and belief, the
work covered by this application for payment has been completed in accordance with the
contract documents, that all amounts have been paid by him for work for which previous
payments were received from the City and that current payment shown herein is now due.
� Contractor: �-lcc-� a q� ��S �n�G �
-�
By:
�
��
Rec fo a en
By: ATTACH ITEMIZED INVOICE
Title: � `!�! � �� `Yl(�:._ � �+; � � '✓�' ; �/j���,
Date: �
Flanagan In
S a 1 e s, I n c.
_ �' DATE INVOICE NO.
��� 10/3 0/2012 14441
�� �~
BILL TO SHIP TO
City of Apple Valley Central Maintenance
7100 - 147th St. W. 6442 - 140th St. W
Apple Valley, MN 55124-7519 Apple Valley, MN 55124
P.O. NO. TERMS REP SHIP DATE SHIP VIA PROJECT
Contract NET 30 DAYS MPD 10/30/2012 TRUCK
ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
Bleacher 3 Row x 15' Bleacher 4 696.00 2,784.00
Bleacher 5 Row x 15' Bleacher 4 3,620.00 14,480.00
Bleacher 10 Row x 27' Bleacher 2 10,095.00 20,190.00
Freight Shipping Charges 3,716.00 3,716.00
Install Installation of above 8,445.00 8,445.00
Sales Tax, Minnesota 6.875% 2,830.44
VEN�Ot� # iVO.
P.O. #
i�n'rc D�f F�ttr"i�
QCT 31 2012
11SE TAX TAX AMT
ACCOUNT#
THANK YOU! WE APPRECIATE YOUR BUSINESS
Total $52,445.44
2475 Maplewood Drive • Suite 114 • St. Paui • MN • 55109
Phone: 651.633.0123 • 1.800.328.3557 • Fax: 651.633.1515 • E-mail: wecanhelp@flanagansales.com • wwwflanagansales.com
PERSONNEL REPORT F' �
December 13, 2012
EMPLOYMENT ACTIONS
The following employment actions are recommended for City Council approval:
First Last Pay Pay Pay Date
Name Name Action Position Status Dept. Rate Type Scale (on or about)
Warming House
Jacob Bechstein Hire Attendant Seasonal 1800 $ 8.06 Hourly A 12/15/2012
Warming House
Daniel Beckman Rehire Attendant Seasonal 1800 $ 8.06 Hourly A 12/15/2012
Warming Mouse
Kathryn Eaton Rehire Attendant Seasonal 1800 $ 8.06 Hourly A 12/15/2012
Leo Granos Hire Liquor Store Clerk Part-Time 5060 $ 10.56 Hourly L1 12/7/2012
Warming House
Michael Grieger Rehire Attendant Seasonal 1800 $ 8.36 Hourly A 12/15/2012
Accept Administrative
Kim Harris Resignation Specialist Full-time 1015 12/17J2012
Warming House
Alyssa Hiedeman Hire Attendant Seasonal 1800 $ 8.06 Hourly A 12/15/2012
Warming House
Charles Kieffer Hire Attendant Seasonal 1800 $ 8.06 Hourly A 12/15/2012
Warming House
Matthew Kratz Hire Attendant Seasonal 1800 $ 8.06 Hourly A 12/15/2012
Warming House
Amadeus Krim Hire Attendant Seasonal 1800 $ 8.06 Hourly A 12/15/2012
Warming House
Cole Maxfield Hire Attendant Seasonal 1800 $ 8.06 Hourly A 12/15/2012
Warming House
Kollin Michels Rehire Attendant Seasonal 1800 $ 8.36 Hourly A 12/15/2012
Accept
Melissa Ruth Resignation Liquor Store Clerk Part-Time 5020 1/1/2013
Warming House
Brock Rutzen Rehire Attendant Seasonal 1800 $ 8.06 Hourly A 12/15/2012
City of Apple Valley
Human Resources Page 1 of 1
... S. A
....
:.:: � • 2
... � �
City of App�e
Va��ey MEMO
� City Clerk's Office
TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator
FROM: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk
DATE: December 10, 2012
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING ON RENEWAL OF 2013 ON-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE
FOR SPOON INC., DB/A SPOON
Section 111.24(B)(2) of the City Code requires the City Council hold a public hearing on all "On-
Sale" liquor renewal applications. The City Council set the public hearing for all "On-Sale"
licenses for November 20, 2012. At that time, the public hearing for Spoon Inc., d/b/a Spoon was
opened and continued. The City Council will reconvene the public hearing to consider the renewal
application by Spoon, Inc., d/b/a Spoon at its meeting on December 13, 2012.
As part of the renewal application process, a background investigation was completed. Staff
confirmed on the Dakota County records system that the property taxes are current. Staff also
learned that Spoon is not included on the delinquent taxpayers list provided by the Minnesota
Department of Revenue as posted on the Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division's website.
Both the Police and Fire Departments completed a review of each department's contacts, incident
responses, and inspections at Spoon's establishment. Police and Fire Deparhnent representatives
are prepared to present evidence of their findings at the Council meeting. The City has been
notified that the licensee andlor its legal counsel are also preparing to present information.
The current On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License and Special License for Sunday Liquor Sa1es held
by Spoon Inc., d/b/a Spoon expire at midnight on December 31, 2012.
Subject to any comments that might be received and following the hearing the Council may take
any of the following actions:
• Deny the renewal application.
• Conditionally approve the renewal of the license for a period less than one year.*
• Conditionally approve the renewal of the license for 2013. *
* City Code requires final payment of license fees and insurance documents to be submitted by
December 15. The actual license would not be issued until all of the documents are received
and fees are paid.
Recommended Actions:
1. Reconvene the public hearing on the "On-Sale" liquor license for Spoon, Inc., d/b/a Spoon.
2. Motion adopting resolution regarding renewal of "On-Sale" license for Spoon, Inc., d/b/a
Spoon.
�P.lg
Attachments
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
RESOLUTION NO. 2012-
FINDINGS OF FACT AND RESOLUTION
FOR
DENIAL OF RENEWAL OF ON-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE FOR SPOON, INC.
A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Apple Valley, Dakota County,
Minnesota, was held at the Apple Valley Municipal Center located at 7100 147th Street W., in
said City on December 13, 2012, at 7:00 p.m.
The following members were present:
and the following members were absent:
WHEREAS, the City of Apple Valley ("City") granted an on-sale liquor license to
Spoon, Inc., d/b/a Spoon, ("Licensee") for the licensed premises located at 14871 Granada
Avenue, Apple Valley, Minnesota ("licensed premises"). The license expires December 31,
2012; and
WHEREAS, the Licensee submitted an application for renewal of its on-sale liquor
license ("Application"); in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 340A and Apple Valley
City Code, and the City conducted a background check and investigation in connection with the
Application; and
WHEREAS, the City sent written notice to the Licensee of the City Council's November
20, 2012, public hearing to consider the Licensee's on-sale liquor license renewal; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 340A, the Apple Valley City
Council reviewed and considered evidence presented at the public hearing which was opened on
November 20, 2012, and continued to and held on December 13, 2012, for the Licensee's
Application.
Based upon the evidence produced at the public hearing and all records, files and
documents regarding the operations of the Licensee and the Application, the City Council of the
City of Apple Valley makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The City granted an on-sale beer and wine license to Spoon, Inc., dIb/a Spoon,
("Licensee") with licensed premises at 14871 Granada Avenue, Apple Valley, Minnesota,
("licensed premises") on February 11, 2011. The City granted an on-sale liquor license to the
Licensee for the licensed premises on September 22, 2011. The Licensee's on-sale liquor license
was renewed January 1, 2012, and expires on December 31, 2012.
2. The on-sale alcohol licenses were granted to the Licensee for a restaurant
establishment in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 340A, and Apple Valley City
Code.
3. Since May 2011, the Apple Valley Police Department staff responded to no less
than eight incidents occurring during "special events" ir� the Licensee's licensed premises or
complaints about its operations. As a result of the incidents and complaints, the Police
Department learned that the special events include private weddings, birthday parties, and
nightclub music promotions occurring during the evening and night time hours. The Police
Department's meetings with the owners of the Licensee revealed that these special events,
particularly the nightclub music events, are organized and managed by third party "personnel"
who are present on the licensed premises, but are not employees or otherwise under control of
the Licensee. Police investigation further revealed that the "security" personnel present for the
events at the licensed premises are not hired by or even known to the Licensee. Police
investigation further revealed that the "security" personnel present for the events at the licensed
premises have been observed drinking alcohol and carrying firearms while providing "security"
during the events.
4. The Police Department investigations also revealed that nightclub music events
are occurring on the licensed premises. The nightclub events are arranged, organized, and
promoted by third parties and not directly by or under the control of the Licensee. The nightclub
event promoter advertises the event, provides the music for the event and provides "security" at
the event that occurred on the licensed premises. The Licensee's only involvement at the event
was the sale of alcohol on the licensed premises. The Licensee's owners advised the Police
Department staff that it does not control the type of the event, the persons who will attend the
events, or the persons who provide "security" for the events.
5. In May 2012, the Apple Valley Police Department learned from the Minneapolis
Police Department that a known criminal gang had a planned rap music party at the licensed
premises. Apple Valley Police Officers met with one of the co-owners, Kav Theng. Mr. Theng
acknowledged the operation of special events, parties, and nightclub music events at the licensed
premises and that the Licensee released all responsibility for the event and the "security." Mr.
Theng acknowledged that he provided access to the licensed premises to the event host/promoter
without fully identifying or knowing all persons involved in the operation of the event at the
licensed premises.
6. On September 3, 2012, Police Officers responded to a call that reported the
"security guards" at the licensed premises were carrying firearms. The officers' response
investigation revealed that four individuals, ranging in ages from 23 to 26 years old, were acting
as "security" for the nightclub event at the licensed premises at that time. The officers'
investigation further revealed that three of the four individuals were carrying loaded handguns.
While a113 individuals had a permit to carry the firearms, the officers determined that all three
consumed alcohol while working as security at that time at the licensed premises. Further, the
2
investigation revealed that none of the individuals were employed by the Licensee and were not
licensed as private "protective agents" as required by Minnesota law. Finally, while on the
scene, the officers were required to respond and defuse three separate physical altercations
occurring at the licensed premises.
7. On October 27, 2012, the officers responded to a call of a physical altercation
involving 20 to 30 people at the licensed premises during a nightclub event. During the officers'
response, several witnesses reported observing an attendee at the nightclub event in possession of
and banishing a handgun.
8. Under Minnesota state liquor regulations, Minn. Stat. §340A.501, an on-sale
liquor licensee "is responsible for the conduct in the licensed establishment..." Accordingly, the
Licensee is not released from any responsibility in the operation of its licensed liquor
establishment or activity that occurs within its licensed establishment in connection with a
special event, nightclub music event or party that may be organized and promoted by a third
P�Y•
9. Under Minnesota state liquor regulations, Minn. Rule 7515.0520, licensed on-sale
liquor establishments "shall purchase their stock of alcoholic beverages only from duly licensed
Minnesota manufacturers, brewers, and wholesale distributors." On October 16, 2012, the
Minnesota Department of Alcohol and Gambling conducted an inspection of the Licensee's
licensed premises. The inspection revealed that the Licensee had purchased alcohol from off-
sale retailers for the purpose of re-sale in violation of Minnesota state liquor laws.
10. Since May 2011, the Apple Valley Police Department staff inet with the co-
owners of the Licensee on no less than 17 occasions regarding incidents occurring during
"special events" in the Licensee's licensed premises and complaints about its operations. The
Police Department staff advised the Licensee of the incidents and complaints, offered alcohol
server training, and suggested methods to handle the special events and security as the Licensee.
1 l. From January 2011 to the present, the Apple Valley Fire Department inspector(s)
inspected the licensed premises ten times, of which five were re-inspections for revealed multiple
Fire Code violations. The inspections revealed that the Licensee repeatedly continued to obstruct
exit doors, provided for occupancy in excess of the maximum occupancy load permitted for the
licensed premises, used extension cord for permanent wiring needs, and failed to properly
maintain exit signs. These violations are significant public safety concerns and directly affect
the safety of the Licensee's patrons, particularly those patrons attending the evening and night
time events at which alcohol is served and consumed and the patrons' ability and judgment may
be impaired to safely exit the building in the event of a fire.
12. The City sent the Licensee notice of the November 20, 2012, public hearing for
consideration of renewal of its on-sale liquor license. At the licensee's request, the public
hearing was continued to December 13, 2012.
3
13. The Licensee's representative, Ms. Van Ngo and legal counsel for Spoon, Inc.,
Mr. Michael Padden, did appear at the public hearing on November 20, 2012, and continued to
and held on December 13, 2012.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Apple
Valley, Dakota County, Minnesota, that it hereby declares that renewal of the on-sale liquor
license for Spoon, Inc., d/b/a Spoon, with a licensed premises located at 14871 Granada Avenue
in Apple Valley, Minnesota, would not be in the public interest.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the on-sale liquor license for Spoon, Inc., d/b/a
Spoon, with a licensed premise located at 14871 Granada Avenue in Apple Valley, Minnesota,
shall not be renewed.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that effective January 1, 2013, no person shall sell,
barter, keep for sale or otherwise dispose of alcoholic beverages as a part of any commercial
transaction on the premises located at 14871 Granada Avenue in Apple Valley, Minnesota.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that City staff is authorized to take any action, including
legal action or suit, to enforce the terms of this Findings of Fact and Resolution.
ADOPTED this 13th day of December, 2012.
Mary Hamann-Roland, Mayor
ATTEST:
Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Findings of Fact and Resolution was duly
made by Councilmember and duly seconded by Councilmember
and upon vote being taken thereon, all members voted
in favor, except the following voted against the same:
WHEREUPON, said Findings of Fact and Resolution was declared duly passed and
adopted and was signed by the Mayor and her signature attested by the City Clerk.
4
SAMPLE LIQUOR
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
RESOLUTION NO. 2012-
A RESOLUTION RENEWING LIQUOR LICENSE FOR SPOON
WHEREAS, the City Council, pursuant to City Code Section 111.24(B)(2)(c) held a
public hearing on November 20, 2012, and continued it on December 13, 2012, with respect to
renewal of the liquor license for the year 2013 of Spoon, Inc., d/b/a Spoon, 14871 Granada
Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the renewal application as it is on file with the
City Clerk.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Apple
Valley, Dakota County, Minnesota, as follows:
1. To grant and approve a license for "On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor" and for "Special
License for Sunday Liquor Sales" to Spoon, Inc., d/b/a Spoon on premises located at 14871
Granada Avenue, subject to:
A. All terms and conditions of City Code Chapter 111, as amended.
B. The right of the City Council to require, at its sole discretion, the presence of peace
officers during any hours of operation at the sole cost and expense of the licensee.
C. The effective date of this license shall be January 1, 2013.
2. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to execute said license.
3. This license shall expire at 11:59 o'clock p.m., December 31, 2013. A renewal
application must be received on or before October 1, 2013, pursuant to City Code Section
111.23(B).
ADOPTED this 13th day of December, 2012.
Mary Hamann-Roland, Mayor
ATTEST:
Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk
S.A
ADD�'�10Nf� �.-
Daugherty, Mole�rda, Solfest, Hilis & Bauer P.A,
("�'p'C("^'4°����r�°v� ry� ,�^��y�-r��� 7±00West]47thStreet
i.,� C.t ti,.7.1 : l��l .�: sut�e �oo
� w /�'�t}Ctlk' S A£�V[SOCS a��pie v��ey, nTx ssi2a
� I (952)432-313b Phone
(452) �32-3780 F'ax
www.dmshb.com
MEMORANDUM
TO: Tom Lawell, City Administrator
FROM: Sharon K. Hills, City Attorney
DATE: December 13, 2012
RE: Spoon's: Council Action Options
Our File No. 66-33182
In response to your request, the following is an outline of the Council's options in its action on
Spoon's application for renewal of its on-sale liquor license:
1. Deny renewal
2. Grant renewal for one year with or without additional conditions
3. Grant renewal for a period of X months up to one year with no additional conditions; or
4. Grant renewal for a period of X months up to one year with additional conditions.
The council has the authority to impose additional restrictions on the sale of alcoholic beverages
by licensees in addition to those specified in the City Code and state liquor laws. Accordingly,
Council could impose conditions upon Spoon's renewed liquor license, such as the following:
• Licensee attend, with all its employees, the AVPD's alcohol server training program;
• Licensee attend monthly meetings with the AVPD to review and discuss incidents or
problems that may occur;
• Licensee comply with all Fire Code requirements: particularly occupancy load
restrictions, no obstruction of egress (doors); operational fire exit signs and Licensee
shall allow Fire Department personnel on the premises during regular business hours for
purposes of fire code compliance inspections, not less than once per month;
• If Licensee utilizes security personnel, then all persons used for security personnel shall
be a W-2 employee of the Licensee or a Minnesota licensed protective agent
retained/hired and paid by the Licensee;
• Licensee shall not allow any third party to arrange, organize, promote or operate any
event on the licensed premises; all events shall be operated and managed wholly by the
Licensee.
If the council grants the renewal for a time period less than 1 year with conditions, then the
license will expire at the end of that period and subject to renewal again. If the license is subject
to conditions and the Licensee violates a condition, the license will NOT automatically
terminate. The council may take action to then suspend or revoke the license or decide not to re-
renew at the next renewal period.
� . C.�
...
I Q2
.,..
,....
....
....
City of AppVa��e
y MEMO
Finance Department
TO: Mayor, City Council and Tom Lawell, City Administrator
FROM: Ron Hedberg, Finance Director
DATE: December 10, 2012
SUBJECT: Conduct 2013 Truth in Taxation Meeting and Consider Adopting the 2013 Final
Budget and Property Tax Levy
Introduction:
The City is required to adopt a final property tax levy and certify to the County Auditor each year
by the end of December.
A preliminary budget and levy was adopted at the September 13 City Council meeting. This
preliminary levy was used by Dakota County to prepare the notices of estimated property taxes that
were mailed to property owners in November and included notification of the Truth in Taa�ation
Meeting to be held on December 13, 2012.
After the preliminary levy was adopted we were notified of total property values came in much
lower than previously believed. Most of the significant change in values were in the Industrial and
Agricultural classes as well as higher values captured in TIF Districts. This significant drop in
taxable values result in the property taxes notices showing higher property tax impacts than were
contemplated by the City Council when the preliminary levy was adopted. To arrive at the same
property ta�� impact as contemplated at the preliminary levy adoption, the final levy would need to
be reduced $480,000. The final levy reflects this reduction to the levy of $480,000 and results in
the same impact to the Median valued home as contemplated in September.
The final budget also includes the addition of a new fund, the Cable TV Capital Outlay Fund. This
fund would be used to fund upcoming equipment improvements to the cable television operations
and meeting presentation equipment. The funding for this fund has no property tax impacts and
would come from Cable Franchise Fees that are received that are in excess of the amounts
budgeted within the General Fund. This fund can be found on page 245 of the final adopted budget
book.
The following items were used to reduce the total levy and the changes are included in the 2013
Adopted Operating Budget to be considered an December 13 A reduction to budgeted health
insurance in General Fund in the amount of $112,454 was achieved by reducing the budgeted
amounts for employees who select single coverage. This reduction is shown in each of the program
Mayor and City Council
2013 Final Budget and Property Tax Levy
December 9, 2012
p2
budgets and summarized on page 20 of the General Fund Summary, expenditure object line #6145.
The allowance for uncollectable property taxes was reduced by $200,000 and reflects the
improvement in the experience in collections in the first year of the levy. This is shown on the
Property T� Levy History on page 3. The remainder of the amount needed will come from the use
of budget reserves in the amount of $167,546, to be realized in the 2012 General Fund Budget.
These reserves would be used to fund one time 2013 Capital Outlay budget items in the Police and
Fire Department budgets. These items include $98,700 for the parking lot at Fire Station #1, and
the carryover of $42,000 in grant dollars received in 2012 far the purchase of police cars that were
not included in the 2012 capital outlay budget. The remaining $26,846 would fund the evidence
inventory software and cabinet door replacement in the Police Department.
The 2013 budget process began on May 4, 2012 when the City Council held a goal setting session
with staff and provided specific direction that the 2013 budget be developed that minimizes the
impacts to the property taxes paid by property owners in light of current economic climate.
Staff believes that the Final Adopted Budget, with the included reductions, accomplishes this and a
number of important objectives:
• A reduction of 1.6% ($14) in the City's portion of the property t�es on the median valued
home.
• Property taYes will be lower than they were in 2009, when the voter approved 2008 park
bond levy started.
• Addresses a stated goal of the City Council to not specially assess for the annual street
maintenance program by canceling an existing park bond levy and adding to the street
maintenance levy. This is made possible by paying the debt service on the 2004 park bonds
with existing resources.
• The 2013 budget provides for the re-establishment of three long term vacant positions;
Police Sergeant, Police Officer and a Park Maintenance employee.
Mayor and City Council
2013 Final Budget and Property Tax Levy
December 9, 2012
p3
2013 Operating Budgets
The 2013 Proposed Budget includes total revenues of $54,362,383 and total expenditures of
$66,633,736, including capital outlay in the enterprise funds of $11,202,850. Of this total budget,
the General Fund total revenues and expenditures are $25,138,659, which is an increase of
$617,345, from the Council Adopted 2012 Budget.
Tc�tal �:'�
Summary - All Budg�t�ed Funds Revenues Ex�nditures Capital Outlay Expenctitures
and Capital
a����
General Fund 25,138,659 24,243,234 895,425 25,138,659
Equipment Fund 447,000 - 447,000 447,000
Cable TV Joint Powers 190,209 190,209 190,209
Cable TV Capital Projects Fund 100,000 - 250,000 250,000
EDA Operations Fund 14,000 17,500 - 17,500
Road Improvement Fund 5,360,000 505,000 4,855,200 5,360,200
Future Capital Projects Fund 224,200 960,000 1,353,000 2,313,000
Enterprise Funds:
Liquor Fund 9,435,000 9,478,681 20,000 9,498,681
Valleywood Golf Course 1,178,500 1,175,971 - 1,175,971
Water and Sewer Fund 9,436,000 8,293,505 10,516,400 18,809,905
Sports Arena 794,115 949,391 14,000 963,391
Storm Drainage 1,479,000 1,288,125 470,250 1,758,375
Street Light Utility 465,000 457,000 7,200 464,200
Cemetery Fund 100,700 71,645 175,000 246,645
Total Enterprise Funds 22,888,315 21,714,318 11,202,850 32,917,168
Total Budgeted Funds 54,362,383 47,630,261 19,003,475 66,633,736
Property Tax Levy Summary
The proposed levy to support the 2013 final budget requires a total levy of $22,410,946; an
increase of $385,697 or 1.8%. The impact of the 2013 levy on a home valued at $185,800 that
experienced a 5.88% decrease (the median decline on the median valued home) in value will
result in the city portion of property taxes paid decreasing approximately $14, or approximately
1.68%, in 2013.
The 2013 Property Tax Levy includes a significant change from prior years. The final 2013
budget includes adding an additional property taY levy directed to the annual street maintenance
program. The increase in the tax levy supported portion of the annual street program is
$1,084,000 for 2013. This is made possible by the decision to pay for the 2004 Park Bonds out of
available existing resources and thereby allowing the 2013 scheduled property tax levy to be
canceled for these bonds.
Mayor and City Council
2013 Final Budget and Property Tax Levy
December 9, 2012
p4
A summary of the past three years of property tax levy history is:
Levy Component 2011 2012 2013 2013 - Final $ Change
reliminar Bud et '12 to'13
G��eral �'��n€� ,. ' $�7�8�t�,{}Qt? $;I7;897,�4E1 � 2�,�44;��7U, ...�.�'�;�64;�7�, .... :�"2��x�'�t}'
Street Maintenance Pro ram 1,598,000 1,675,000 2,755,000 2,755,000 1,080,000
Ma�1�et �akuie I�om��ste��l�re�tat 1,1 ��?;t�� F
.. ,. _
• , :
Pro ert Tax Delin uencies 200,000 40Q000 400,000 200,000 (200,000)
U�bt ���'vic�-.:�t�t�r :.';. ro���l 1��i4,��IU ' I,8(12 863�. . .a .�. Y .. ; 8f���t?Ot� . �._ ���.�x4�U} :
Debt Service- All other lev su orted 258,000 251,249 428,376 428,376 177,127)
�'c►t�l , �}+� ,} {�(� { � �[ ,( pr (y
�:: � � LGS��n� �i'„ 3�����`i'� ,.��i��iJi7�4� w{{1 ��a�t���Y� .�; Y� �'�OJj�7�'���..
Impacts to Property Taxes Paid
The impact of the fina12013 property tax levy on a home valued at $185,800 (the median value)
that experienced a 5.88% decrease in value (the median decline) will result in the city portion of
property taxes paid decreasing approximately $14, or approximately 1.6%, in 2013. The taxes
on this median value home are $852 and will be at their lowest level since 2009 when the 2008
park bond levies began. Included in the total tax paid by the median valued home is funding for
the annual street maintenance program. The total amount included in the median valued home's
tax bill for support of the 2013 annual street maintenance program is $101, an increase of
approximately $39 per year from 2012 levels. This increase in the funding of the annual street
maintenance program through property taa�es provides the ability for the City of Apple Valley to
avoid the use of special assessments to properties abutting improved streets in the project area.
This special assessment practice is common in other communities. The drawback to including
the property tax levy for the annual street maintenance program and not using special
assessments is that the City of Apple Valley's property tax rate will be higher than other
communities, but in exchange for this higher property tax rate, property owners will benefit by
not having the burden added by special assessments when the street is improved.
2f�13 Property Taxes a� Low�st Level since 2t�a9
�
$900 ----_...__.._ _---- $ 881 _ _----. ___ � 869----_._ __ _-$.. g62 _..._..... ____$8SS___......._...__.___�
$ 836
$850 --- _. __.._..._ —_ _-----
. _ �
; $8�D --- � � � -- � ` �
$75U
�7QQ __..
$65p � `+` � � �
$6t}4 _..... _ ......._ ` ' ,
$550
$5UU
�
rn o � c�, m
O 4 � O O O
�
�
9
� Net Tax �oliars paid - eaccluding voter referendum $ � Tax dotlars an MV Ref rate $
�
Mayor and City Council
20l 3 Final Budget and Property Tax Levy
December 9, 2012
p5
Tax Base
The overall community-wide tax base will decline for 2013. The overall taxable market value
has declined 6.6%, with all classes except apartments declining. Included in the decline is the
additional effect related to the additional Taxable Market Value Exclusion homesteaded
properties receive when values decline. Residential property values include new residential
construction of $11.2 million. One positive addition to the tax base reflects $14,867,600 of newly
constructed apartments included in the 10.5% overall increase to the apartment property class.
Property G{a�s Pavable 2Q�1�1 Pa�abte 2a�2 Raya�le 2013 : Payable ��13 Ghanpe
' Rrel�m. ' D�acert�b�r `13 ��12 tc� '�13
Residential $3,681,590,'100 $3,286,217,506 $3,026,238,584 $3,017,727,378 -8.2%
Commercial 477,169,800 469,515,200 465,520,400 46�1,093,000 -1.8%
Industrial 38,901,200 37,109,200 36,273,000 30,Z73,100 -18.4%
Utility 13,373,300 13,428,800 13,428,800 11,482,300 -14.5%
Agricul#ural 13,233,600 11,895,500 11,640,100 9,526,800 -19.9%
Cabins 395,900 231,600 215,9Q0 215,900 -6.8%
Apartments 193,911,000 203,976,351 225,529,619 225,339,619 10.5%
Personal Property 38,793,800 39,388,4Q0 39,480,800 38,519,200 -2.2%
Total $4,457,368,700 $4,061,752,557 $3,818,327,203 $3,794,�177,297 -6.6%
General Fund Revenues
Property taxes provide 74% of the total revenues of the General Fund, the main operating fund of
the City of Apple Valley. The increase in Licenses and Permits of $92,150 results from a new
electrical inspection permitting process provided through the building inspection department and
2013 is the first full year of this service. The electrical inspections were brought into the City of
Apple Valley to provide a more responsive inspection process than what was being experienced
previously through a state inspection service. This move also provided the ability for the City to
continue conducting electrical inspections last year when the state electrical inspection service
was suspended during the State of Minnesota shut down. The increase in Other Charges for
Services include additional engineering service revenues related to additional construction
activity.
2011 Arr�ntled �12 Adopted 3013 +2�13 ' Change
Bud�et E�udg�t Prekminary '� FinalBudget ��012 t+�
8udget ' 2413'
Property Taxes $ 18,073,000 $ 18,110,000 $ 18,657,570 $ 18,377,570 $ 267,570
Franchise Fees & other Taxes 485,000 524,000 538,019 538,019 14,019
Licenses & Permits 601,520 679,550 771,700 771,700 92,150
State Police & Fire Relief Aid 528,831 571,389 582,997 582,997 11,608
Park 8� Rec- Chgs 8� Rents 1,050,000 1,094,000 1,081,000 1,081,000 (13,000)
Other Charges for Services 834,325 1,052,725 1,118,827 1,118,827 66,102
Fines & Penalties 315,000 279,450 282,000 282,000 2,550
Other Revenues 305,000 274,000 274,000 274,000 -
Transfers In, Admin charges 1,936,200 1,936,200 1,945,000 2,112,546 176,346
and Use of Reserves
total $ 24,128,876 $ 24,521,314 $ 25,251,113 $ 25,138,659 $ 617,345
Mayar and City Council
2013 Final Budget and Property Tax Levy
December 9, 2012
p6
General Fund Expenditures
The General Fund Expenditure budget totals $25,138,659 for 2013, and expenditures are equal to
the budgeted revenue which is considered a structurally balanced budget. The City of Apple
Valley is a service provider whereby wages and benefits make up 68% of the General Fund
Budget for 2013; a makeup common to other service providers. With the filling of three vacant
positions for 2013, the largest dollar impact to the budget is in wages and benefits.
Gen�ral Fund 2011 2012 2Q1� 2013 �hanc�e Change
Expenditures Pr�timinary Fin�i 2t112 to �s ° Io
(in $1(�Oa's) ' Budget Budget ': 2�13
Wages & Salaries $ 12,248,727 $12,550,561 $12,985,078 $12,985,078 $ 434,517 3.46%
Employee Benefits 4,001,868 4,054,361 4,160,706 4,048,252 (6,109} -0.16%
Supplies 1,419,547 1,523,783 1,465,554 1,465,554 (58,629) -3.81%
Contractual Services 2,926,613 2,758,810 2,811,928 2,811,928 53,118 1.92%
Utilities 654,935 637,570 617,543 617,543 (20,�27) -3.13%
Repairs & Maintenance 286,358 371,058 356,520 356,520 (14,538} -3.77%
Travel,Training,Dues 519,515 491,961 481,930 481,930 (10,031) -2.04%
Other Expenditures 1,369,888 1,357,670 1,391,429 1,391,429 33,759 2.43%
Items for Resale 71,000 71,200 73,200 73,200 2,000 2.82%
CapitalOutlay 617,625 692,140 895,425 895,425 203,285 29.38%
Transfers Out 12,800 72,800 12,800 12,800 - 0.00%
$ 24,128,876 $24,521,374 $25,251,113 $25,138,659 $ 617,345 2.52%
Salaries and Wages
For 2013 the budgeted salaries expenses increased $434,517, or 3.46%, and this includes the re-
establishment of three positions that have been vacant for a number of years. The three positions
include a Police Sergeant, Police Officer and a Park Maintenance employee. The total budget
impact to budgeted salaries for these three positions is $169,000 in addition to the budget impact
to benefits of $70,000 for these three positions. None of the union contracts have been settled for
2013, so a provision was ineluded in the budget to address expected increases.
Employee Benefits
Employee benefits include not only the mandated employer contributions for FICA (Social
Security and Medicare) and PERA, but the expenses associated with workers compensation and
an employer contribution towards health insurance. The final budget for 2013 reduced the
preliminary budget amount for employer provided health insurance for those employees who
elect single coverage. The employer contribution rates for FICA and PERA remain the same for
2013. Overall, the budget impact for employer contribution towards the insurance program
decreased $6,109 for the general fund, or 0.16%
Supplies
Overall the supplies budget decreased $58,629 for the General Fund. Of the decline, $31,000 is
related to non-recurring purchases included in 2012 for mobile computers for police cars and
$11,000 for gas monitors in the Fire department that are not included in the 2013 budget. The
overall fuel budget was increased $20,000, 5.3%, and reflects the current price paid for fuel and
the uncertainty of that market.
Mayar and Ciry Council
2013 Final Budget and Property Tax Levy
December 9, 2012
P�
Contract services
Contractual Services shows a 1.9% increase, or $53,113, for 2013 and is related to a new budget
item for 2013 related to the electrical inspection services of $47,000 in Building Inspections in
addition to an increase in the Community Development budget of $15,000 for the local share of a
Transit Oriented Development grant.
Utilities
Overall, the utilities budget is down $20,027 and reflects the energy efficiencies gained over the
past couple of years. In particular the natural gas budget is down $11,000 for 2013 and is down
$134,000 from the 2009 budget amounts.
Other Expenses
The 2013 budget for items included in other expenses increased $33,000, of which $20,000 is the
additional minimum required contribution for the Apple Valley Firefighters Pension. In
addition, property insurance charges increased $5,000 for the coming year.
Capital Outlay
In total, capital outlay increased $203,285. Because of the non-recurring nature of capital outlay
purchases and the variability of the capital items needed, the budgeted amounts will change from
year to year. Some of the items of note in the General Fund's capital outlay budget include the
replacement of 6 vehicles in the Police Department's fleet, and the replacement of the sports
court surfaces at Delaney and Farquar Parks. In addition, a number of other replacement vehicles
were included for various fleet replacements.
Detail of the General Fund Capital Outlay items:
��pitaf Dutlay G�n�ral F�und
Department Description 2013
IT Server / Workstation Upgrades 104,000
Police / Fire Laptops 8,000
Agenda Mgmt Software 24,000
other IT 8,000
Police 4 Squads 112,000
2 unmarked cars 54,000
Office Furniture 14,000
Replace Quetel System 20,000
Fire Fire Station # 1 parking Lot Rehabilitation 98,700
Fire Marshall Vehicle 36,600
Engineering Pickup 22,000
Bldg Inspections Pickup 22,500
CMF CMF Carpet Replacement 42,000
CMF Compressor 14,250
Office Space - Municipal Center for PW 8,500
Streets Two 3/4 Ton Pickups 68,000
Water truck replacement (shared with Parks) 3,800
Mayor and City Council
2013 Final Budget and Property Tax Levy
December 9, 2012
Pg
Capital outlay far general Fund —:( �or�finued j
Department Description 2013
Streets Compressor (unit 371) 14,400
Park Maint Replace #231 3/4 Ton Pickup 19,000
Sport Court Surfaces (Farquar & Delaney Tennis) 112,000
'05 Kawasaki Mule #258 11,500
'01 Aerovator # 290 -
Backup Pump Kelly Fountains -
Aquatic Center Fiberdek Platforms 20,000
Redwood Pool Diving Board platform 7,500
elimbing wall 7,500
AVCC Energy Upgrades 10,000
Refurbish Hardwood floor 20,000
Hayes Comm & Sr.Cntr carpet Extractor 6,500
Total General Fund Capitat Outlay 888,750
Equipment Certificate Fund
Another fund used for larger ticket non-recurring capital outlay purchases is the Equipment
Certificate Fund. Funding for this fund comes from the issuance of equipment certificates (a
form of bonded debt) with repayment terms ranging from 5 to 10 years. The total to be funded
out of the equipment certificate fund for 2013 is $447,000.
E�UIPMEI�IT FLTI�D
Parks Replace #215 2002 Taro 580-D Mower 72,000
Replace mowers (# 218, 201) 52,000
Replace JD Tractor (unit # 201) 45,000
Water truck 135,000
Public Works Replace Loadall (Unit 336) 143,000
Total Equipment Fund 447,000
Truth in Taxation Meeting
The City Council has set aside December 13, 2012 for holding the Truth in Taxation Hearing.
ACTION REQUIRED
Following the presentation and conducting the Truth in Taxation Hearing on the 2013 Budget
and Property Tax Levy the City Council is asked to consider adopting the attached Resolution
adopting 2013 Proposed Budget and Property Tax Levy.
__
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
RESOLUTION NO. 2012-
RESOLUTION ADOPTING 2013 PROPOSED BUDGETS AND TAX LEVY
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the proposed 2013 operating budget on August 9�`
and on August 23 as set forth in E�ibit A of this resolution; and
WHEREAS, the Council desires to adopt the operating budgets for management purposes;
and
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Statutes require the certification of the Proposed Budget and
Tax Levy for taxes payable in 2013 by December 28, 2012, to the County Auditor.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Apple Valley
that revenue and expenditure budgets for 2013 shall be as noted in E�ibit A of this Resolution and
as supported by the detailed document, as revised.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council that the 2013 scheduled levy for the
2004 / 2012 GO Refunding Bonds is hereby cancelled and a transfer in the amount of $980,400 is
approved from the Future Capital Projects Fund to the 2004/2012 GO Refunding Bond Fund; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council that the following proposed sums of
money be levied for the current year, collectible in 2013, upon the taxable property in the City of
Apple Valley for the following purposes:
General Purposes: $18,364,570
Annual Street Maintenance Program 2,755,000
Debt Levy:
Market Value Based
GO. Refunding Bonds 2004 -�-
GO Park Bonds 2007 395,000
GO Park Bonds 2008 380,000
GO Park Bonds 2011 88,000
863,000
Tax Capacity Based:
GO Equipment Certificates 2010 117,000
GO Equipment Certificates 2012 178,000
Rec facility Bonds of 2004 121,000
Special Assessments — Eastview Storm Sewer 12,376
428,376
$ 22,410,946
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby instructed to transmit a
certified copy of this Resolution to the County Auditor of Dakota County, Minnesota.
ADOPTED this 13th day of December, 2012.
Mary Hamann-Roland, Mayor
ATTEST:
Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk
CERTIFICATE
I, Pamela Gackstetter, City Clerk, hereby certify that the above resolution is a true and correct copy
of a resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Apple Va11ey, Dakota County, Minnesota,
on the date above indicated.
Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA
2013 Operating Budget Summary Exhibit A
Other Governmental Funds Total
Cable N Cable TV EDA Road Future Budgeted
General Equipment Joint Powers Capital Projects Operations Improvement Capital Enterprise Funds
Revenues: Fund Cert Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Projects Funds 2013
General property taxes - Current $18,164,570 $ - $ - $ - $ - $2,755,000 $ - 121,000 $21,040,570
General property taxes - Mobile hon 13,000 - - - - - - - 13,000
General property tax- Delinq Net 200,000 200,000
Property tax- Current & Delinq Net $18,377,570 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,755,000 $ - $ 121,000 $ 21,253,570
Franchise & othertaxes 538,019 - 71,000 100,000 - - - - 709,019
Special assessments 14,000 - - - - - - - 14,000
Licenses 154,900 - - - - - - - 154,900
Permits 616,800 - - - - - - - 616,800
Jntergovemmental 582,997 - - - - 1,190,000 - 237,315 2,010,312
Charges for services 1,732,227 - 86,458 - - - - 22,086,000 23,904,685
Fines and penalties 282,000 - - - - - - - 282,000
Investment earnings 160,000 6,000 2,000 - 14,000 - 174,200 293,000 649,200
Other Revenues 100,000 - 17,951 - - - 50,000 151,000 318,951
Rents 467,600 - - - - - - - 467,600
Use of Reserves 167,546 - - - - - - - 167,546
Admin Charges to other funds 820,000 - - - - - - - 820,000
Subtotal before transfers & debt 24,013,659 6,000 177,409 100,000 14,000 3,945,000 224,200 22,888,315 51,368,583
Debt Issued - 441,000 - - - - - - 441,OW
Transfers In 1,125,000 - 12,800 - - 1,415,000 - - 2,552,800
Total revenues 25,138,659 447,000 190,209 100,000 14,000 5,360,000 224,200 22,888,315 54,362,383
Expenditures:
Salaries & Wages 12,985,078 125,187 - 2,727,518 15,837,783
Sociat Security (FICA & Medicare) 680,851 9,577 - 216,269 906,697
PERA 1,127,192 9,004 - 170,438 1,306;634
Provided Insurance 1,919,326 26,240 - 390,462 2,336,028
Other Benefits (Work Comp,etc) 320,883 501 - 51,757 373,141
Totai Personai Service 17,033,330 - 17Q509 - - - - 3,556,444 20,760,283
Supplies 1,464,554 - 3,100 - - - -_ 481,935 1,949,589
Contractural Services 2,811,928 - 2,300 - - 505,000 - 529,655 3,848,883
Utilities 617,543 - - - - - - 691,040 1,308,583
Repairs & Maintenance 356,520 - 3,100 - - - - 403,890 763,510
Travel, Training, Dues 481,930 - 7,750 - - - - 49,771 539,451
Other Expenditures 1,391,429 - 3,450 - 17,500 - - 3,168,138 4,580,517
Miscetlaneous - - - - - - - 190,000 190,000
Rems for Resale 73,200 - - - - - - 7,570,100 �,643,300
CapitalOutlay 895,425 447,000 - 250,000 - 4,855,200 1,353,000 11,202,850 19,003,475
Depreciation - - - - - - - 2,351,600 2,351,600
Admin Fees - - - - - - - 670,000 670,000
Debt Service - - - - - - - 926,745 926,745
Subtotal before transfers 25,125,859 447,000 190,209 250,000 17,500 5,360,200 1,353,000 31,792,168 64,535,936
Transfers Out 12,800 - - - - - 960,000 1,125,000 2,097,800
Total expenditures 25,138,659 447,000 190,209 250,000 17,500 5,360,200 2,313,000 32,917,168 66,633,736
Revenues over (under) expenditures - - - (15Q000) (3,500) (200) (2,088,800) (10,028,853) (12,271,353)
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA
2013 Operating Budget Summary - Enterprise Funds Exhibit A
Enterprise Funds 2013
Valleywood Water Sports Storm Street Total
Liquor Golf Course & Sewer Arena Drainage Light Cemetery Enterprise
Revenues: Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Utility Fund Funds
General property taxes - Current $ - $ - $ - $121,000 $ - $ - $121,000
General property taxes - Mobile home $- -
General property tax- Delinq Net - - - - - -
General property tax- Current & Delinq I $ - $ - $ - $ 121,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 121,000
Franchise & other taxes - - - - - - -
Special assessments - - - - - - - -
Licenses - - _ _ _ _ _
Permits - -
Intergovemmental - - - 237,315 - - - 237,315
Charges for services 9,400,000 1,175,000 9,087,000 421,800 1,449,000 465,000 88,200 22,086,000
Fines and penalties - - - - - -
Irnestment eamings 35,000 3,500 214,000 - 30,000 - 10,500 293,000
Other Revenues - - 135,000 14,000 - - 2,000 151,000
Rents - - - - - -
Use of Reserves - - - - - - -
Admin Charges to other funds - - - - - - - -
Subtotal before transfers & debt 9,435,000 1,178,500 9,436,000 794,115 1,479,0� 465,000 100,700 22,888,315
Debt Issued - - - - -
Transfers In - -
Totalrevenues 9,435,000 1,178,500 9,436,000 794,115 1,479,000 465,000 100,700 22,888,315
Expenditures:
Wages 8 Salaries 805,594 462,378 1,116,229 342,017 - - 1,300 2,727,518
Social Security (FICA & Medicare) 71,326 35,371 83,326 26,146 - - 100 216,269
PERA 57,071 15,832 76,432 21,009 - - 94 170,438
Provided Insurance 92,037 42,379 223,185 32,861 - - - 390,462
Other Benefits (Work Comp,etc) 13,567 5,1t1 27,913 5,158 - - 8 51,757
1,039,595 561,071 1,527,085 427,191 - 1,502 3,556,444
- - 616,652 427,191 - - - 1,043,843
Supplies 31,600 113,000 269,785 33,100 11,900 15,000 7,550 481,935
Contractural Services 37,070 25,500 226,320 51,700 149,690 6,500 32,875 529,655
Utilities 58,800 37,000 427,400 135,000 30,800 - 2,040 69t,040
Repairs & Maintenance 32,810 21,000 269,330 34,000 46,350 - 400 403,890
Travel, Training, Dues 11,391 10,900 22,510 2,600 1,105 - 1,265 49,771
Other Expenditures 237,350 72,500 2,829,075 14,200 3,200 1,900 9,913 3,168,138
Miscelianeous 15t,000 17,000 22,000 - - - 190,000
Items for Resale 6,956,000 157,500 23,000 - - 433,600 - 7,570;100
CapitalOutlay 20,000 - 1Q516,400 14,000 470,250 7,200 175,000 11,202,850
Depreciation 137,000 16Q500 1,457,000 131,000 450,000 - 16,100 2,351,600
Admin Fees - - 370,000 - 300,000 - - 670,000
Debt Service 261,065 - 250,000 120,600 295,080 - - 926,745
Subtotal before transfers 8,973,681 1,175,971 18,209,905 963,391 1,758,375 464,200 246,645 32,836,011
525,000 - 600,000 - - - - 1,125,000
Total expenditures 9,498,681 1,175,971 18,809,905 963,391 1,758,375 464,200 246,645 32,917,168
Revenues over (under) expenditures (63,681) 2,529 (9,373,905) (169,276) (279,375) 800 (145,945) (10,028,853)
Addback:
Principal Portion Debt Service inc above 145,000 - 150,000 110,000 230,000 635,000
Capital outiay above - not an expense 20,000 - 10,516,400 14,000 470,250 7,200 175,000 11,202,850
Netincome 101,319 2,529 1,292,495 t45,276; 420,875 8,000 29,055 1,808,997
� 1 . �.�.�
•
�
���
����
!. ��*��
#i�:i
+� # +� � :� �
� ,.. �:
_:�
�� � .
��
2��� �+����+� B��g�:� ��d �`� L��
��
��� �+�un����"r��t� ��:�'���ie�r� �e��i��
, : . r � � � 3 ,. ��_
.� r . ;
�3���1��' � 3, 2�12 .�:
�.:
•
Budget Development Pracess
QGoal Setting Session Held May 4tn
QLengthy Budget Development Process
QFollow-up Budget Discussions with Council
oAdopt Preliminary Budget and Levy on September 11t"
QSelected December 12t" as Truth in Taxation Meeting
L�fNotice included in the parcel specific notice sent by the County.
[�County Mailed Parcel Specific Notices between Nov.
11t" and Nov 25tn
�Budget Data Available on City Website
❑Council "Truth in Taxation Meeting", December gtn
❑Adopt Final Budget and Tax Levy at December 8tn
Council Meeting (Backup date December 22"d )
•
1
. �#
•
Budge� Challenges for 2013
= Economy continues to struggle
� State budget structurally unbalanced
� $1.3 billion surplus for 2012/13
• $1.1 billion shortfall for 2014/15
• Increase in the Annual Street Maintenance Program
� Transition of property tax levy from park bond to Annual Street
Maintenance Program
• 2"d Year of Homestead Market Value Exclusion Program
•(lowers residential taxable value in community)
t Property values continue to fall
• Drop in Industrial, Agricultural and utility values
•
Final Budget Accomplishes Objectives
• Residential Property taxes to fall 1.6% ($14 per year) for
median valued home ($866 to $852)
• Property taxes will be lower than they were in 2009
• Addresses goal of the City Council to not Specially
Assess for the annual street maintenance program.
= Made possible by canceting an existing park bond levy.
s Re-establishes three long term vacant positions;
� Police Sergeant,
� Police Officer
• Park Maintenance employee.
•
2
� •
•
Budget Highlights
• Road Construction and Reconstruction
• Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction
� Greenleaf neighborhood & Whitney
• Overlays and Micro-surFacing Projects
• Total $4.9 million for 2013
• Addition of Levy for Street Maintenance Program
• Decertification of Tax Increment District #13
• Water Treatment Plant Expansion Project
• Facility Design Process Completed
• Re-Bid
•
Budget Highlights
� Valleywood 2013 first year of new Clubhouse
• Municipal Liquor Store Operations
• Transfer of $525,000 to General Fund Proposed
• Support Parks and Recreation and Police Department in 2013
• Stormwater Management Activities
• Added Federal and State Mandates
• Easement Acquisition Process
• Cable Television Franchise Renewal
• New fund for Cable TV Capital Outlay
•
3
•
Taxable Market Value Camparisan
..- .. � .- �
.. - � . - .� - � . �
$
Residential 3,286,217 506 $ 3,026,238,584 $ 3,017,727,378 -8.2%0
Comm./ Ind.' 50fi,624 400 501,793,400 491,366,100 -3.0%
Utilit 73 428 800 13,428,$00 11,482,300 -14.5%
A ricultural 11,895 500 ' 11 640,100 , 9,526,800 -19.9%'
Cabins 231,600 ' 215,900 215,900 -6.8%
artments 203,976,351 225,529,619 225,339,619 ' +10.5%
PersonaF
Pro ert 39,388,400 39,480,800 38,519,200 +0.2%
Total $4,061,762,557 $ 3,818,327,203 $ 3,794,177,297 -6.6%0
•
Change in Value by Property Class
� -- -- _____- ------- ------ -----_ ____- --- ---
% Change in Tax Capacity by type
(Overall 635 decline)
-30% -20% -10°h 0% 10i6 20%
�, ._ � �� , ;,. ;G..
Residentiai , , �
� C&I ' ! �
! , '
utility � �
� AEricultural ��
I �
I � � ; Cabins ,
I � �� � � �
; Apartments ,
i:. � .. . I .. ........
� Personal Property , ' ' .
i
� New Costruction Value ■ MV Appreciation
•
4
•
°lo Change in Median Valued Home
15.0% __._.___ ___-- _ ______.___
_._._____._.____ _ ___._. __ _ __ _.—.._. _ __._
12.0%
10 .0� ... _ _ -_ _-- -8:�96. _. _�- � _ .. __.. v v ....w__ _ _. __._�_ ���._ �u.� _
5.73'0 6.896
5 .095 ._ _..__ _ ___ __ _. _ _ .. _ _ ._ __ _ _w._ _ _ _. ------
0.6%
0.090 _,._ _ _ i■■a�
-5.096 2.4% �
-6.4% -5.9°%
-10.0% �-_..._. .s�w� -- 7 5%
2004 2fl05 2005 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
■% change in Median Value Home
i
Distribution of Home Values
( 62% of homes befinreen $150,�00 and $300,000 ) ,
_ _ _ _ __. ___ __ __.
Number of Homes by �
Value Threshold (15,023 total) ;
l.d0o ..._ ........ . . ....... ..... ... . . . ..... ... ___. ._..... ......... ......... ; .
I
Median value '
� 1 200 �:�. ... . . . . . � $185,800 . . .. ...... .. ........ ... .... .. �
�
1.000 ... . . . . .. ...... ... .. ... .... .. �
i
i
1
800 . . .. . . . . 7 .
� 80 % of Home s � �
underE270,000in
� . .... ..... ... .. _ Value __. ....._ 1
, - 1
3
1
aoa ; �
i
�
. 200 ,I.I � � ,..,. . , ., ..., . .�,� � � � �..�.� I I.� �,�>�,I,I �.l.,a r.:.,.a., �
� �\ 1 1 1 \ �\ �\ ,�,\ , �,1 �\ .�\ p\ y\ \ \ \ 1 .y\ .�,\ p\ .�1 .y1 . , \ �
� �°�°� � '�` �` �� � � ° �°��`°���°� ` °�°�°�° ' � 9 ° 8 r °8d'A ,. � p o$ p � i
'�� � "Y�� � � 1^O 'Y 1'Y� 'Y' '{'� '�� 'P '9�� '!'p � � ; �� P'�� P� F' P � 4!' 0 ' � . .,W
� �� � �.lp ti`$ '+�fi� �° �tA 'L'� � � ro'L ^P �'' �'° a� >'� ef s4� � �'�4,�,��,� ' .
v+w. a mm�. �n sa,000�• 1 w xt i
.._.».�.._�_ ..__.w_.r. ___._.._._,._..._.__._ .._____'.�._._._..___.__.._'w� _'____..._ _.___._.,_.__J
•
5
•
Pay 2013 —
value declines tightly distributed around 5% and 6%
s,aoo . _ __ . __
7,000 .
6, 000 4.i�e a�u�d sx ���
5,000 _ _ ___ ,,� �.°� __ �_ w w
4,OQ0 . _
3,000 ; _ . . . -= __ _ __
�2,OQ0 �� _ . _____.._ ._. ��� __ _��:�. m _. . . _ �� ___���� _. _. ,.� _ �
�. . �.,�Z99 . .
1 ��VD 931 '
_ _ _ _._
Q . 114 30� 263 298 323 �� 3M 180 754 163 � 101 .�:.
.� �.� � .. S t _� �.... _ S � � � � � ' .
o�o o�o ow o�a o�o o�o a�o o�o � o� o� o� o�o o�o o�o o�a
,�o, ,�3 ,�ti �� ,�o � � � y� h � 3 ;� ;. o ��.
�� o �g
■decline Pay 2013
•
Changes to the Budget since Adoption of
Preliminary Budget
• Reduction in tax base since preliminary levy adopted
• Levy reduced by $480,000
� Expenditure Reduction to City provided Insurance $112,454
• Reduction to Allowance for uncollectable Taxes $200,000
• Use of reserves for one time items $167,546
• Total $480,000
• New Fund Added
• Cable TV Capital Projects fund
• Replacement of Cable TV and Presentation Equipment
• Funded by a portion of the Cable franchise fee
•
6
•
Proposed City Final Levy
• 2013 Amount of $ 22,410,946
• 2012 Amount of $ 22,025,249
� Proposed 1.8% Increase
• Increase of $385,697
• The Proposed Final Levy is $480,000 lower
than the Preliminary Levy
�
Praperty Tax Levy Components
. �. � � .
General $18,297,000 $18,364,570 $ 267,574
Fund '
Allawance for ' 400,000 200,000 (200,000)°
Uncotfectible taxes
StreetMaintenance 1,675,000 2,755,000 1,080,000'
Prograrn
Debt Service - 1,802,QOU $63,fl40 ( 93�,0�0} `
lfoter Approved
Debt Service- aU 251,249 428,376 177,727
other levy
supported
Total . $ 22,025,249 . $ 22,4/0,946 $385,f97
•
7
�
Property Valuatian 2 Year Process —
2013 taxes based on 1-1-12 values
� January 1, 2012— property valued by assessor (includes
assessor review in 2011)
� March 2012— Property Value notices sent to owners
• June 2012— Board of Equalization meets to hear
valuation objections
• Nov 2012— Value used for preparing parcel specific
notices for taxes of NEXT yr. (2013)
15
•
Homestead Market Value Exclusion
HMVE System
• New system in 2012
• Homeowner receives reduction to taxable Market Value
� Formula similar to the MVHC
• Max value excluded is 40% for home valued at $76,000
� Exclusion is reduced 9% for home value in excess of $76,000
t MVE phases out at $414,000
� Results in tax rate changes:
• Tax Rate goes up because of the reduced tax base, which
is why taxes increase for other types of property
• Impacts to differing property types/values depends on the
mix of properties in the jurisdiction and the tax rate
•
8
•
Truth in Taxation Notice — now incfudes both Estimated
Market Value and Taxable Market Value
� ,/� � � ,� P�r,nF�Trr.ax�T+oN Your Proposed �roperty Tax for 2013
� �f� ,q 7t� RECORD3 - c -. : a : � ■ � .. : °. ;
'""". "�. aa++�r�s�a+rwn. ccr�rFa I�sPORTAM- IhFOR�JATIph IS Pt�!NTED Qh! TMC GAGK OF THIS �ORI .
56pH1(�y1,�Y �S �� t I-•.'7
Hfi. h i 0.1INM`-4[.t .��};,,ki:i� '���
wriu^,t,�akF;t-(:�uty!.is �
- rtJ!��:F35�5 zJt� ..�MOaPy��511Ue201a
OWt�ERtS}:
�sop n�Ciasa�7r,:an-n pgg9 . nE89FtBTe
€,o � d n k z va��,�: 17tl,f00 1&5.800
!'I'NII� -a��si �� t9�5D9 x4,618
CT'h.P'1=.YSI.Ckk+t9ly D �
TiY.iNPUeF101U@I4!` �2��� }�',�
PR,'�, FFR ��7' Aft',li{ES5 ?�ax ta..&�In marMn wiur m.n�rrrr far p3�.aNu,� ,?,�� ,� ;R.� m
C5kk5149TH Ci »m mn sf+. �..G =K 2 7 .: ��.3 f msc.r.ri� n^. ^.s 4t�nres o»
APPI€ YA�1.EY I� Sif2-0 rea� �+ Fnn�c_ a gc t :�ra ta wu+r varaat� -
�.. A3tfifY A4nF !'.! pfyrt ue(�l^.A� GE . A'nY.
�.A.C�� ..... . .. ..... � ���.��.. ..... � .. �.� ... . .. .... . ..'
��� ��� �1.� ��i.� �
STA7EGENERAtTA% .� .p4
.: SCSiDI5T1g6
4R']TERAPPROVED(EViEB E43.18 589�Z2
D'IHE'ft LOCAC tEUIES ]3T.5i �.fi2
�
Truth in Taxation Notice — now includes both Estimated
Market Value and Taxable Market Value
�`�c�� l�r��+���d �"rc���r�t� T��c f�� ��1 �
, �;.
R ��� ; : � � �� � � � �.
I��F�C�RT��I' IhF�7t�►.�.ar�c�n; i� PAir�TEn nr� T�iC �S�C�t QF `f�-fl�, �i��t
R'rn�.°t7+} �C'
s� �
'ra�> F�vat*r �U7:.} 77xa� r�;�kir �7i 4`s
�ro{:r-h� [:u��Ra#r:.ati^r F�Sp ttSTG R�3G H5T17
�'stirral�d ��1nrk�st i�alt��?: 19�,i�10 °I�k.$D�f
M4'Y'�51��*5 �ICL,�t::�u<t �� ����
tr,hts� FxGI.'T3pFE?r�I� Q �
,a.�.�t�� t�ac�� 4r�iu� 1��.5"� ��Ei
�.4 l�xbttla markgl ►vlue Yx* r.,^.xz�,-r i�x j�X�a;t� A� P^?:� a�s ��a.R�' t4
��aL �*� m,r: .e�.ti�� 9f c���;c' 7?�c!;:c�rraY t[� Gts,:.ss � ii�'���s !��:5
�+�;+�CKK� LvrsY C�t�,y�C:'� [:l.n i?G �47�tT�P �`.fs� !� �:::h� t� .ty'rt.r' {� v.7J��sit.\1R�.
� , .
9
.
F�ecanciliation to TnT Notice
2011 2012
Property Value 197,100 185,800
Less Homestead MV Exclusion (19,501) (20,518)
= Taxable Market Value 177,599 165,282
% change in Estimated MV -5.7%
% change related to Homestead MVE � -1.2%
% change in Taxable MV -6.9%
•
How can my property taxes go up when
my value is falling ?
• Property values determine the allocation of the total tax
levy to each property.
• When one property changes in value relative to other properties
• A simple example
• City with only 5 homes
• All valued at $10,000
• City levy is $5,000
.
10
•
Year 1 Tax Allocation
• 5 homes of all same value, each $10,000
• Total city levy in first year $5,000
$10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000
•
Year 1 allocation — � �
Each home pays $1,000
Value % of total Tax Bill
value
��� � "� '�
�,���1 ; ��'��� : �� ����►
Home 2 10,000 � 20% $1,000
��m� � < �4,�+�� ���?/� : ��.����
Home 4 10,000 20% $1,000
Hc�r�� � �U,t�fl(� �+a'��� ����Q�'
_ _ _ _ _ _: ._. _.
� 50,000 100% $ 5,000
.
11
•
Year 2 Tax Allocatian
• 4 homes decline 10% to $9,000, one declines 5%
• City levy stays the same at $5,000
$ 9,000 $ 9,000 $ 9,000 $ 9,000 $ 9,500
•
Year 2 allocation — 4 tax bills decline 1.1 %,
1 increases 4.4%
�_
; Value � % of Tax BiII __ �
! ' total change
�
; ! value in taxes
;
H�rrt� 1 E �,�OQ 'I �,�°I� $ �8� �1, � °l� .
_ _��_ �� _ _�__
�
Home 2; 9,000 I, 19.8% $ 989 -1.1 %
._
, � , �._
' Ht�r�e �� �;�3QQ ' '�� �°Io $ �89 �,'t��'�;
Home 4; 9,000 i 19.8% $ 989 -1.1 %
�� �
,� �:
Ht�r�� � � 9,�t�O C ' �� 9 �1,(34� '�# ��°��
: ,
j 45,500�_ 100% $ 5,000 _ 0.00% �
•
12
•
Many variables in the property tax equation
• Change in Property values relative to other property is just
one variable in the equation.
• Many Variables:
� Total levy
� Change in the property classification system
R Change in Market Value Exclusion
� Change in Fiscal disparities
• New property values added
�
Sample Calculation (cifiy portion only)
Property Value 185,800
Less Homestead MV Exclusion (20,518)
= Taxable Market Value 165,282
State Class Rate 1.0%
= Tax Capacity 1,653
Property Tax rate 49.16%
= Gross taxes paid $ 813
Plus Referendum 39
Property Tax Dollars Paid - City $ 852
•
13
•
Sample Hause Example #1
pay 2013
� Market Value 185 800 that experienced 5.88% decline
• Represents the Median Sample Home in Apple Valley
� Changes Tax ExtensionlTax Capacity Rate from 44.08% to 49.16%
• Change MV Rate from .0420%to .0211°/a
Est. Property Taxes 2012 2013 Change
City $ 784 $813 $ 29
City Ref 82 39 ( 43)
MVHC -0- -0- -
Total $ 866 $ 852 ( $ 14)
Percentage Change (1.6%)
•
Sample House Example #2
pay 2013
• Market Value 100 000 that experienced 5.88% decline
• Changes Tax Extension/Tax Capacity Rate from 44.08% to 49.16%
� Change MV Rate from .0420% to .0211 %
Est. Property Taxes 2012 2013 Change
City $ 347 $ 353 ` $ 6
City Ref 44 21 ( 23)
MVHG -0- -0- -
Total $ 391 $ 374 ( $ 17)
Percentage Change (4.3%)
•
14
•
Sample House Example #3
pay 2013
• Market Value 300 000 that experienced 5.88% decline
R Changes Tax Extension/Tax Capacity Rate from 44.08% to 49.16%
� Change MV Rate from .0420% to .0211 %
�st. Rroperty Taxes 2012 ; 2013 Change
City $'1,367 $1,425 $ 58
Gity Re# 133 63 ' ( 70)
MVHC -0- -0-
Total $ 1,500 ,$1,488 : ( $ 12)
Percentage Change ( 0,8 ° 1a )
�
Sample House Example #4
pay 2013
• Market Value 414 000 that experienced 5.88% decline
�$414,000 is the point that the MV Exclusion phases out.
x Changes Tax Extension/Tax Capacity Rate from 44.08% to 49.16%
• Change MV Rate from .0420% to .0211 %
Est. Property Taxes 2012 2013 ChangQ
City $1,939 $2,035 $ 98
Gity Ref' 183 87 ( 96}
MuHC
Total $2,122 $ 2,�122' $ 4
Percentage Change 0.0°l0
•
15
•
Taxes paid on Median Value Home Declines
s9oo — s2 ss
$ 836 $ 852
$850 -- --- -
$800
$750
$700
$650 � �'
$600 —
$550
$500 —
0 0 �°-� � � �
N N N N N, N
■ Tax Dollars on MV Ref rate
■ Net Tax Dollars peid - excluding voter referendum $
•
aoare — S 2z.�
Public Worlcs -- -�— - - $ 10.48
Park and Recreation $ 10.29
Street Maintenance Pro ram $ 7.77
Fire S 4.9z
Cit Councr� Administration & Human Resources $ 4.Q6
Debt 5ervice $ 3.65
M on thl y �ommuniryDevelopment&CodeEnforcement _ __ _ $ 1.39
Fin ottce � -$- — 1.82
cost for InortnaHonTechnology $ 1.82
lnsurance/Contu�u�ency _ _ $ 1.13
---- _ __ _ _ _- - ----
Le�alSernces $ 0.44
Clt�/ -- -- --- ---- --
Total rMonth $ 71.L0
� ►aenrawr�ar x936
Services ���� r��
DnT! �
� P 1����° I � 7SQ7
MUPk
� Snri�yoxraadG�¢/IIA� �,,. � � �
�
Na.e�y...r�wrr�s R.�.�e.r �
' wa /fr�r./`n66i�s/ii6GsMs�4r� �{O1�COW/'TCI"
�:ODODDU186� �OOU00529�' 10�0 �
•
16
!
Where your tax dollars go —
Breakdown of Property Taxes Paid
— � �
� '���� �' � ��i���.... �`.� `
�
� � � � S1.v x1�vTO5:ll G � .
�. E � ���
�. ( � �
� `� �: a.,
� 5 .�,. �. � � �-u,�..- 5
�
� � � .�....-�.:.,;�
� � � �
Other .037 County .233 City .355 School .375
33
•
Comparison of City Taxes for Median Valued Home
(Based on estimated final rates)
r ___-- -- _ __ . _ ---- -__ _ --- _ . _.._.._ _ _.
Edina $1,108 �
Eden Prairie $1,042 �
Minnetonka $1,011 i
Mendota Heights $1,009
Farmington . ' $982 i
Hasti�s $�15
West St. Paul `,� $g9g j
5t. Louis Park � $8�2 ;
Apple Valley _ • ' ' SSS2 �
Rosemount ����� $851
takevilie
8rooklyn Park . $g g '
Woadbury . 5808' !
Bloomington $792 i i
Bumsvilie $7g4 '.
Eagan $758 i
Inver Grove Hghts $738 !
South St. Paui $712 �
Plymouth • $700 _;
$- $500 $1,Q� $1,500
(emourt a� bar is Tau Ezte�ion Rata) .
�
17
•
Manthly Costs Reasonable Compared to
Other S ervices
I I � � � i
Family YMCA membership 115 ;
� � ' ( I �
i Cable N i$7g I , i
I �
i
� i
�
� Smart Phone �75 � � ( �
! Avg Electric $ i I (
I � ' , (
� I i �
i City Taxes (median value home) ' i �jl I i �
i ', i � i
I Avg Gas $58 , I
i
I Internet $40 ' I (
I
Telephone � $24 i
�
� I— -4 —..__ . . __ — �-- �------ �--- d �
( S- Szo Sao S6o Sso Sioo Slzo S1ao
Source: Met council Website
•
Budget Organization
• General Fund
• Other Governmental Funds
• Equipment Certificates
• Cable TV Joint Powers
• Future Capital Projects Fund
� Road Improvement Fund (Pavement Mgmt Fund)
• Enterprise Funds
• Liquor
• Golf
• Ice Arena
• Water and Sewer
� Storm Drainage Utility
• Street Light utility
• Cemetery
•
18
•
Budget Organization
• Summary Information for Each Department and
Division
• Description of Activity
• Major Objectives for coming year
• Impact Measures/Performance Indicators
• Summary Budget
• Capital Items Proposed
•
General Fund Revenues 2013
���������:
_ _ �Q93,F� T #��q�t ' �.fcQr�es 8� Qerm�a
� .': FranChise Fees �%
2% .
State Potice & Eire
FteliefAiCl '!
' 2%
Park & R�c- Ghg� &'
c
Rer�ts
4�
Taxgs Other±Ch�es �trrc °
,74% �
Services SE Rer�si ;
:5%
i' � � �- �, �
� 1 _�irles&Pemai#es � �
1'/e
Ofil�er R�verwes
°; �;� � �� $ .iQ• Transfers ln and ��
Admin charges "
8"fe
•
19
�
General Fund At-A-Glance
� �
. �. .
� �.. -. . . •.
Personnel Services $16,604,922 ` $17,033,330 2.58%
Commodities/Other $7,224,252 $7,209,904 ( 0.20%)
Capital0utlay $692,140 $895,425 29.37%
General Fund Total $24,521,314 $25,138,659 Z.52%
•
General Fund Expenditure Comparison
(in $1,00�'s)
2011 2012 2013 Change Change
Wages & Salaries $12,249 $12,551 $12,985 S asa 3.5%
Mandated Benefit Programs 2,077 2,100 2,129 zs �.a^io
ER Provided Ins. 1,925 1,954 1,919 (35) -1.8°/
Supplies 1,419 1,523 1,465 (58) -3.8 %
Contractural Services 2,927 2,759 2,812 53 �.s^io
Utilities 655 638 618 (20� -s.� i
Repairs & Maintenance 286 371 357 (14) -3.8°/
Travel, Training, Dues � 519 � 491 � 481 ��o> -2.oio
Other Expenditures 1,370 1,358 1,391 33 2.aio
Items for Resale 71 71 73 2 2.s°io
CapitalOutlay 618 692 895 Zos zs.s^io
Transfers Out 13 13 13 - o.o^io
24,129 24,521 25,139 618 z.s^io
•
20
.
2013 Budget — Staffing Changes
• 2013 Proposed budget includes:
• New Sergeant
• New Police Officer
• New Park Maint. I Position
= Promotion of PW Maint II to Tech Specialist
• Change in HR from HR Representative to HR
Dept Specialist
•
Other Funds
• Road Improvement Fund
• Enterprise Funds
• Liquor
• Ice Arena
• Golf
� Water / Sewer
• Storm Water
• Cemetery
•
21
•
Road Improv�ment Fund
(in $1,�00'sj
REVENUES 2012 Budget 2013 Budget
147th Street 3,845 -
Flagstaff 1, 770 -
Annual Street Maint program 3,655 5,360
9,270 5,360
EXPENSES
147th Street 3,455 -
Flagstaff 1,660 -
Annual Street Maint program 4,155 5,360
9, 270 5, 360
•
Enterprise Funds
� Liquor
• Budgeted revenue increased 5%, transfer at $525,000
• Valleywood
� 2013 first year with new clubhouse, food & bev increased $50,000,
capital outlay incl carts $259,000 (financed), $150,000 irrigation and
mowers
• Water, rate incr 3%, water treatment expansion, annual street program
• Sewer, rate incr. 3.5%, annual street program
• IC@ AP@tla, prime time rates up $10 (5%), savings in new elec rate,
levy remains at $121,000
• Storm Water, no rate increase
• Street Light no rate increase
• Cemetery land purchase
•
22
•
Enterprise Funds Summary
. .
. . ..
.. .
.- . . .,
.
. ,
� ; � 9
435,000 9,478,681 20,000 9,498,681
- ••• • • •, 1,178,500 1,175,971 1,175,971
• ' • • ' ' • 9,436,000 8,293,505 10,516,400 18,809,905
•• ' -� . I ■ 794,115, 949,391 '14,a00 ' 963,391'
• ' • • •' 1,479,000 1,288,125 470,250 1,758,375
• 465,000 457,006 7,200 464,200
' � ` ' •_ 100,700 71,645 175,000 246,645
• • ' • ' • 2?,888,315 21,714,318 ' 11,202,850 `32,917,1�i8
.
Truth in Taxation Notice Calis
• Received 11 contacts in response to notice
• 4- loss of Homestead Status and Tax Impact
• 1— Loss of Military Disability status
• 2— Tax increase larger than value increase
• 1— Request Non- Homestead status
• 1 - Property Classification
• 1— comment that TnT insert did not include other funds
• 1— request for Monthly Payment arrangements
• Property Class / Status questions directed to County
• COUNTY ASSESSORS OFFICE 651-438-4200
•
23
•
State of M i n n esota
Property Tax Refund Programs
• Based on Household Income and the Property Taxes Paid on your
Principal Place of Residence
� State of Minnesota Offers Two Programs Available for Owners of
Homestead Property
• Regular Property Tax Refund
•(For 2011 Total Household Income Maximum of $99,240, Maximum
Refund of $2,460)
� Special Property Tax Refund
�(Eligible if Net Property Tax Increased by more than 12 Percent, and
Increase was at least $100. Maximum Refund of $1,000.
• Renters May Also Be Eligible for Property Tax Refunds from the State
• More Information Available at:
, www.taxes.state.mn.us
•
Senior Citizens'
Property Tax Deferment
• Is administered by the State of MN
• Must be 65 years old
• Household income is $60,000 or less
• Must have lived in home at least 15 years
� Property taxes exceeding 3% of net income
• State pays remaining tax as a low interest
loan
• Unpaid tax and interest will become a lien on
the property
• The lien must be paid at the time of sale
•
24
•
Ongoing Challenges
• Maintaining "Structurally Balanced Budget"
• Impacts of slowing housing market and economy
• State Fiscal Issues
� Potential Changes to PERA funding for Police and
Fire
49
•
To Summarize
� Median value home will see approximately $14
decrease in City property tax bill —
• Based on the final levy
• Homestead Market Value Program
• Additional TNT notice information beneficial
� Shifts tax burden to other values and classes of property
• Additional information available on website
• www.ci.apple-valle .mn.us
•
25
•
Actian Items
� Conduct Truth in Taxation Hearing
• Consider Resolution Adopting 2013
Proposed Budget and Property Tax Levy
�
�
26
...
5.�.3
....
....,
,�„
�..
City of App�e
Va��ey MENio
Finance Department
TO: Mayor and City Council
Tom Lawell, City Administrator
FROM: Ron Hedberg, Finance Director
DATE: December 4, 2012
SUBJECT: 2013 Utility Rates
Introduction
The City of Apple Valley has had a conservation rate structure since 2004 with escalating
charges for consumption for each tier. The philosophy behind a conservation rate structure is that
the rates axe intended to encourage conservation and that as consumption goes up the charges
escalate. In 2009, an additional tier was added to meet State of MN requirements as part of the
annual well permitting process.
For 2013, staff is recommending continuing the same rate structure presented over the past
couple years and most recently in the discussion of the financing for the $15.5 Million water
treatment plant expansion project.
The recommended 2013 overall utility rates increase approximately 2.5% (approximately $3 per
quarter) for the average utility customer. Individually the Water rate increases 2.8% which
reflects the increased expenses related to the Water Treatment Plant expansion project.. The
Sanitary Sewer rates increase by approximately 3.1 %. The Storm Water and Street Light Utility
rates are proposed to remain the same for 2013.
To meet the funding needs of the Storm Water Utility, staff recommended the past three years
that the rate be increased approximately $1.00 per quarter in each of the next 3 years, 2012 was
the final year of that plan and the stormwater rate are projected to remain the same for 2013 at
$15 per Residential Equivalent Factor (REF) and should be sufficient to meet the Storm water
utility needs for the near future.
A summary of the utility rates and example quarterly bill caiculation for average residential use:
AVEFtAGE CONSUMPTION
Quarterly water use 25 25000 25
Quarterl Sewer use 15 15000 15
XISTING 2012 QUARTERLY RATES PROPOSED 2013 RATES EXISTING RATE STRUCTURE
% change
Water Water
base 15.81 base T 6.29
0-15000 15 111 16:65 0-15000 15 114 17.10
16-30,000 10 113 ll.30 16-30,000 10 1.16 11.60
31-45,000 � 137 - 31-45,000 0 1.41 -
45-105,000 0 1.77 - 45-105,000 0 1.77 -
>105,000 0 2.04 - >105,000 0 2.11 -
25 43.76 25 44.99 2.8%
Sewer Sewer
base 20.62 base 21.24
0-15000 15 2.21 33.15 0-15000 15 2.28 34.20
16-30,000 0 2.23 - 16-30,000 0 2.30 -
31-45,000 0 2.47 - 31-45,000 0 2.55 -
45-105,000 0 3.13 - 45-105,000 0 3.23 -
>105,000 0 3.57 - >105,000 0 3.68 -
15 53.77 15 55.44 3.1%
Storm Water 15.00 Storm Water 15.00 0.0%
Street Lights 4.92 Street Lights 492 0.0%
Total Quarterl Charge 117.45 Total Quarterly Char e 120.35 2.5%
Action: Re uc�ested
Staff recommends the City Council adopt the attached resolutions
1. Amending the Water and Sewer Utility Rates for 2013.
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
RESOLUTION NO. 2012-
SEWER AND WATER RATES AND PROCEDURES RELATED THERETO
WHEREAS, the City of Apple Valley operates a sewer and water system pursuant to Chapter
51 of the City Code; and
WHEREAS, Sec. 51.36 of the Code provides that the Council shall prescribe billing procedures
and rates by Resolution; and
WHEREAS, this Council has heretofore adopted the 2013 budget for the Sewer and Water
Fund; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Apple Valley as
follows:
1. Sewer rates, Water rates, and penalties for delinquent accounts shall be as set forth in E�ibit
A with said rates to be effective for all bills mailed after January 15, 2013.
2. All accounts shall be billed on a monthly or quarterly basis. The Finance Director may
schedule the billing system so that it operates on a cycle basis.
3. For each billing cycle, water meters will be read during the period prior to when the bill is
mailed.
4. Each account will be billed for the base charges during each billing cycle even if there is no
water consumption or if the property is unoccupied. The property is receiving the benefit of water,
sanitary sewer, storm sewer, street lights, and water testing services whether the property is occupied or
vacant
5. Bills shall be due within 30 days following the billing transaction date.
6. Any account having a balance of more than $20.00 may have its service disconnected
provided that at least ten (10) days notice has been given of the amount due. No service shall be
discontinued if the user demands a hearing before the City Council in accordance with Sec. 51.39(A)(2)
of the City Code.
7. The Finance Director is authorized to accept partial payments in cases of individual
hardships, in which case no further penalties shall accrue for that billing period after the date when such
arrangements are approved.
ADOPTED this 13 day of December, 2012.
ATTEST: Mary Hamann-Roland, Mayor
Pamela Gackstetter, City Clerk
Exhibit A
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
SEWER AND WATER UTILITY RATES, EFFECTIVE 1-15-13
COLTNCIL ADOPTED DECEMBER 13, 2012
SEWER WATER
EXISTING ' 12 PROPOSED EXISTING ' 12 PROPOSED
RATE ' 13 RATE RATE ' 13 RATE
MONTHLY BASE CHARGE /
UNIT
ALL Users, Except $6.87 $7.08 $527 $5.43
M. Homes & Apartments 6.22 6.41 4.77 4.91
CONSUMPTION CHARGES -Monthly Bills*
First 5,000 gallons $2.21 $2.28 $1.11 $1.14
6,000 to 10,000 2.23 2.30 1.13 1.16
11,000 to 15,000 2.47 2.55 1.37 1.41
16,000 to 35,000 3.13 3.23 1.77 1.77
Over 35,000 gallons 3.57 3.68 2.06 2.11
*RATE per 1,000 gallons/unit
QUARTERLY BASE CHARGE /
UNIT
Single Family, Duplex and
Townhouses with individual services
or up to and including 8 units per
building $20.62 $21.24 $15.81 $16.29
CONSUMPTION CHARGES - Quarterly Bills*
First 15,000 gallons � $2.21 $2.28 $l.l l $1.14
16,000 to 30,000 2.23 2.30 1.13 1.16
31,000 to 45,000 2.47 2.55 137 1.41
46,000 to 105,000 3.13 3.23 1.77 1.77
Over 105,000 gallons 3.57 3.68 2.06 2.11
*RATE per 1,000 gallons/unit
SEWER FLOW BASIS - Sewer consumption charges are based on the average 3 metered monthly
winter water consumptions or the winter quarter water consumptions, except commercial and
institutional are based on water consumption each month. If the residence was not occupied by the
current customer during the 3 winter months, the sewer charge will be based on the actual water quantity
used up to 12,000 gallons each month until a standard 3 winter months or winter quarter is established.
Exhibit A (Continued)
SEWER AND WATER RATES
PRORATING POLICY - New accounts of less than a full month/quarter due to ownership or occupancy
changes.
1. WATER - The base charge shall be prarated with consumption charges based on actual quantity used.
2. SEWER - The account shall be prorated based on the charge for the most recent winter water
consumption (for accounts being closed) or the charge for actual water quantity used up to 12,000
gallons each month (for new accounts) times the number of days of occupancy in the month and
dividing the result by 30.
DELINQUENT PENALTY CHARGES — For quarterly bills a penalty of 4.5% (for monthly bills a
penalty of 1.5%) of the account balance shall be added to the account after each due date that the bill or
part there of remains unpaid, with a minimum of $3.00, except that no penalty shall be added to any
account having a balance of $5.00 or less.
WATER TURN ON FEE - A fee of $30.00 shall be paid before any water service is turned on and $32
after 5-31-13.
� S . �. 3
� 12/13/2012
•
2013 Utility Rates
A �Vauey
•
2013 Utility Rates
* Water and Sewer rates to address Treatment plant
• Assumptions
° Includes 10 year CIP $30.8 million in Water
� Includes 10 year CIP $8.1 million in Sewer
= Assumes borrowing in'13 for Treatment Plant, 20yrs at 3%
• Rate structure stays the same
* Storm Water
• Assumptions
° Includes 10 year CIP $63 miilion
inflation 3% in CIP and related to personal services, 2% in other suppiies and
services
• Rate per REF stays the same at $15 / Qtr.
• Street Lights
� Rate remains the same@ $4.92
� Rates Reflect previously presented strategies
� Rates increase overall approx 2.5%
•
1
12/13/2012
•
Rate Recap - (average use) -
Water
AVERAGE CONSUMPTION
Quarterly water 25 25000
Quarterly Sewer 15 15000
EXISTING '12 RATES PROPOSED '1 3 $ change
Water
base 15.81 16.29 0.48
0-15000 15 1.11 16.65 1.14 17.10 0.45
16-30,000 10 1.13 11.30 1.16 11.60 0.30
31-45,000 0 1.37 - 1.41 - -
45-105,000 0 1.77 - 1.77 -
>105,000 0 2.04 - 2.11 -
25 43.76 44.99 1.23 2.8%
.
Rate Recap - (average use) -
Sewer, Storm, Street Lights
AVERAGE CONSUMPTION
Quarterly Sew� 15 15000
EXISTING '11 RATES PROPOSED '12 $ change
Sewer
base 20.62 21.24 0.62
0-15000 15 2.21 33.15 2.28 34.20 1.05
16-30,000 0 2.23 - 2.30 - -
31-45,000 0 2.47 - 2.55 - -
45-105,000 0 3.13 - 3.23 -
>105,000 0 3.57 - 3.68 -
15 53.77 55.44 1.67 3.1 %
Storm Water 15.00 15.00 - 0.0%
Street Lights 4.92 4.92 - 0%
total 117.45 120.35 2.90 2.5%
•
2
,
12/13/2012
•
Action Requested
• Resolution Setting Water and Sewer Utility Rates
•
•
3
S, �.'�
...
....
:::•.
...
City of AppVa��ey
MEMO
Finance Department
TO: Mayor, City Council and Tom Lawell, City Administrator
FROM: Ron Hedberg, Finance Director
DATE: December 4, 2012
SUBJECT: Liquor Fund Transfer for 2012
Each December the City Council has approved the yearly transfer from the Liquor Fund to the
General Fund. The City Council has directed that these arnounts transferred are to support the
Police and Recreation Programs and thereby lowering the property tax levy. Over the past 10
years, $4,410,000 has been transferred to support General Fund operations. The 2012 budget
included $525,000 in transfers from the liquor operations.
Annual Transfers frc�r� Liqu+�r Oper��tians Total
�4,41t},U04 since 2�U3
S�t�o,000 . _.... . _
i __ __. _ _ _ _.._...
���,� �—__.-- —_ _____ � � �
, �
�� � ; ' ' � \ �`�
' � � , `, �
�� ,; � �\��a� . �� � � � .
$3DO,OOD �� � ' �; ' � �CS � �- � "'
� : t �s
� � � �� ` �' `C � � � �'� � I '�
$2pp,tiUU ��� �� � ..: � � � �. � ���\ ��
'�'� � � � � � -���� £ it� �{� -
( {^�o- � � � ` `� � ��� '� � i �
�� � � �-' � � z € � �
$SUO,E�UU � � ' � `� �---€ � �
�
€ ��� z� � ': � � �a � .�:
� ti \�`
`� ` — ��.-' -� ;c.. __... :. _�! , .. � .:�! `% 3 � ` ..—.. �_ —.�..; y_ix..;:.. � .�—.: �,; �'�,�..� --
O 4 O O O O O O O O
N N N N N N�� N N N N
ACTION REQUIRED
The City Council is asked to consider adopting the attached Resolution Authorizing the 2012
Transfer from the Liquor Fund to the General Fund in the amount of $525,000.
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
RESOLUTION NO. 2012-
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE 2012 TRANSFER
FROM THE LIQUOR FUND TO THE GENERAL FUND
WHEREAS, the 2012 General Fund budget included a transfer from the Liquor Fund in the
total Amount of $525,000.00; and
WHEREAS, there is sufficient money in the liquor fund to meet the fund's operating costs
and to make the transfer to the General Fund.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Apple Va11ey,
Dakota County, Minnesota, that effective December 31, 2012, the amount of $525,000.00 sha11 be
transferred from the Liquor Fund to the General Fund to support recreation activities.
ADOPTED this 13th day of December, 2012.
Mary Hamann-Roland, Mayor
ATTEST:
Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk
...
S. G
....
:..:•
... .
City of AppVallev
MEMO
City Clerk's Office
TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator
FROM: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk
DATE: December 10, 2012
SUBJECT: TRAFFIC SAFETY ADVISORY COMMITTEE VACANCY
On September 27, 2012, the Council authorized accepting applications for the Traffic Safety
Advisory Committee vacancy through November 30, 2012. Three applications were received by
the deadline and provided to you under separate cover. Listed below are the names of those
individuals.
Robert Damon
Sharon Schwartz .
Laura Turek
This appointment has a three-year term expiring March l, 2015.
Staff recommends considering appointment at the December 13, 2012, meeting. If the Council
would like to fill the vacancy, ballots will be distributed. A copy of the resolution establishing
procedures for appointing committee members is attached for your review. Following the
balloting process, a motian should be made adopting the resolution appointing the individual to
the Traffic Safety Advisory Committee.
Please advise if you have questions.
�pJg
Attachments
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
RESOLUTION NO. 1997-165
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A PROCEDURE FOR
APPOINTMENT TO FILL POSITIONS ON COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES
WHEREAS, the City Council has established advisory commissions and committees
whose members are appointed by the Council and any vacancies during a term are also filled by
Council appointment, and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to establish a written procedure by which to make
such appointments, and
WHEREAS, this procedure will be used as a preliminary process and not a binding
Council action; further Council action, by motion, will be necessary to appoint candidates for the
positions.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Apple
Valley, Dakota County, Minnesota, that the following procedure will be used to reduce the
number of candidates considered by the Council in making appointments to advisory
commissions and committees and to fill any vacancies thereon:
1. The Mayor will call for nominations for a position or positions from the
Councilmembers.
2. A nominee may decline the nomination at any point up to the time that nominations
are closed.
3. When no further nominations are offered, the Mayor will close nominations.
4. If the number of nominations is equal to the number of positions to be filled, a
motion to make the appointment shall be in order. The motion shall be in the form
of: "I move to appoint to the position of "
Vote shall be by roll call with the Mayor casting the first vote and the Council
alternating from right to left of the Mayor, starting with the member to the right of
the Mayor.
5. If the number of nominations is greater than the number of positions to be filled, a
written roster will be prepared listing the nominees and the Council shall proceed in
the following manner:
a) On the first round, and any subsequent rounds, each Councilmember shall, in
writing, select that certain number of names which is one less than the total
number of the names appearing.
b) After the City Clerk has received the selection from each Councilmember, the
City Clerk shall record the selection and announce the remaining names.
c) Any name or names not having been selected by more than two of the
Councilmembers shall be stricken by the City Clerk from the succeeding round
and shall no longer appear as a name(s) to be considered by the Council;
except that, if after selection by the Council there results a tie between or
among all the names appearing on the round, the Council, in writing shall
again select until one or more names have been stricken; provided, however,
that if such a situation exists, the Council shall not reselect more than three
times. In such a situation, the process shall end. Otherwise, the process shall
end when only one name remains.
d) After the process has ended, a motion to make the appointment shall be in
order. The motion shall be in the form of: "I move to appoint
to the position of ." Vote shall be by roll call with the
Mayor casting the first vote and the Council alternating from right to left of
the Mayor, starting with the member to the right of the Mayor.
ADOPTED this l Oth day of July, 1997.
/s/ Garv L. Humphrey
Gary L. Humphrey, Mayor
ATTEST:
/s/ Mary E. Mueller
Mary E. Mueller, City Clerk
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
RESOLUTION N0. 2012-
RESOLUTION APPOINTING TRAFFIC SAFETY ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBER
WHEREAS, Section 32.02 of the Apple Valley City Code, as amended, provides for
appointment by the City Council of inembers of the Traffic Safety Advisory Committee; and
WHEREAS, a vacancy now exists on the Traffic Safety Advisory Committee due to the
resignation of Harald Ericksen.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Apple
Valley, Dakota County, Minnesota, that is hereby appointed to the Traffic
Safety Advisory Committee.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that members of the Traffic Safety Advisory Committee
are then as follows:
Name Term Expires
1. Todd Blomstrom March 1, 2013
2. Linda Dolan March 1, 2013
3. Joe Shaw March 1, 2013
4. Michael Marben March 1, 2014
5. Arthur Zimmerman March 1, 2014
6. Charles Grawe March 1, 2015
7. Vacant March 1, 2015
ADOPTED this 13th day of December, 2012.
Mary Hamann-Roland, Mayor
ATTEST:
Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk
TRAFFIC SAFETY ADVISORY COMMITTEE
December 13, 2012
ROUND NO.
❑ Robert Damon
❑ Sharon Schwartz
❑ Laura Turek
❑
❑
Name
8.
...
....
.....
....
...
City of qpp�e
Va��ey MEMO
City Clerk's Office
TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator
FROM: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk
DATE: December 10, 2012
SUBJECT: CALENDAR OF EVENTS
Following are upcoming events for your calendars:
Day/Date Time Location Event
Mon./Dec. 10 10:30 a.m. Apple Valley Transit METRO Red Line Kick-Off Event
Station
Wed./Dec. 12 11:30 a.m.-1:15 p.m. Old Chicago Chamber Christmas Luncheon and
Awards Banquet
Thur./Dec. 13 5:00-7:00 p.m. American Bank Chamber Business After Hours
Thur./Dec. 13 5:30 p.m. Municipal Center Informal City Council Meeting
Thur./Dec. 13 7:00 p.m. Municipal Center Regular City Council Meeting *
Eagan Community Dakota-Scott Workforce Investment
Fri./Dec. 14 11:30 a.m.-1:00 p.m. Center, Eagan, MN Board — Legislative & Employer
Awards Event
Wed./Dec 19 2:00-5:00 p.m. DCTC Campus, DCTC Foundation Holiday �
West Atrium Celebration
Wed./Dec. 19 7:0 p.m. Municipal Center Planning Commission
Mon./Dec. 24 Gity Offices Closed Christmas Floater
Tues./Dec. 25 City Offices Closed Christmas Holiday Observed
Thur./Dec. 27 7:00 p.m. Municipal Center Regular City Council Meeting *
Each of the above-noted events is hereby deemed a Special Meeting of the City Council, the purpose
being informational or social gathering. Only at events marked with an asterisk will any action of the
Council take place.
:sam
RSSCKREG LOG20000
CITYOFAPP. :.LEY 11/2 9:16:24
Council Check Register Page - 1
11/16/2012 -11/23/2012
C heck # Date Amount Suppiier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
7481 17/2312072 101720 CENTERPOINT ENERGY SERVICES IN
2,112.66 CH NAT GAS OCT 217110 2506772 1060.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS MUNICIPAL BLDG & GROUNDS MNTC
559.00 IA1 NAT GAS OCT 217111 2506752 5210.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS ARENA 1 BUILDING MAINTENANCE
45.96 SWIM NAT GAS OCT 217112 2506272 1940.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS AQUATIC SVNM CENTER
832.74 CMF NAT GAS OCT 217113 2506762 1540.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS CMF BUILDINGS & GROUNDS MNTC
3,550.36
1482 71/2312072 101365 ECM PUBLISHERS INC
162.00 2012 LONG LAKE RETROFIT BMP'S 217114 391066 5552.6239 2011143D PRINTING CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS I
85.50 LEGALAD-2013 ON-SALE LIQ LICE 217115 392063 1015.6239 PRINTING CITY CLERKlELECTIONS
63.00 LEGALAD-MASTER DEV DISTRICT 217116 392104 1015.6239 PRINTING CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
310.50 I
1483 77/23I2012 100217 GRAINGER
7.93 SHOP-PNEUMATIC DRAIN VALVE 00035184 216796 9973544472 1530.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS CMF SHOP EQUIP MNTC & REPAIR
125.24 UTIL-MAGLITE, RECHARGE BATTERQD069614 216797 9976687757 5330.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES WTR MAIN/HYDRANT/CURB STOP MNT I
133.17
1484 11/23f2012 100497 GREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY �
115.50 UNITED WAY DEDUCTION 216381 1106121622365 9000.2120 ACCRUED BENEFIT LIABILITY PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
115.50 UNITED WAY DEDUCTION 217095 1119121553194 9000.2120 ACCRUED BENEFIT LIABILITY PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET I�
231.00
1485 11/23/2012 100289 LOGIS
168.05 LOGIS SERVICE 217154 35836 5205.6399 OTHER CHARGES ARENA 1 MANAGEMENT
463.22 LOGIS SERVICE 217154 35836 5005.6399 OTHER CHARGES LIQUOR GENERAL OPERATIONS
4,598.13 LOGIS SERVICE 217154 35836 5305.6399 OTHER CHARGES WATER MGMT/REPORT/DATA ENTRY.
4,598.13 LOGIS SERVICE 217154 35836 5365.6399 OTHER CHARGES SEWER MGMT/REPORTS/DATA ENTRY
13,773.47 LOGIS SERVICE 217154 35836 1040.6399 OTHER CHARGES DATA PROCESSING
1.07 LOGIS-PAYMODE 217155 35891 5205.6399 OTHER CHARGES ARENA 1 MANAGEMENT
2.67 LOGIS-PAYMODE 217155 35891 5005.6399 OTHER CHARGES LIQUOR GENERAL OPERATIONS
6.20 LOGIS STATE WAN CHARGE 217155 35891 5205.6399 OTHER CHARGES ARENA 1 MANAGEMENT ,
11.22 LOGIS-PAYMODE 217155 35891 5303.6399 OTHER CHARGES UTILITY BILLING
11.22 LOGIS-PAYMODE 217155 35891 5303.6399 OTHER CHARGES UTILITY BILLING �
15.50 LOGIS STATE WAN CHARGE 217155 35891 5005.6399 OTHER CHARGES LIQUOR GENERAL OPERATIONS ,
27.23 LOGIS-PAYMODE 217155 35891 1040.6399 OTHER CHARGES DATA PROCESSING ,
77.50 LOGIS STATE WAN CHARGE 217155 35691 5303.6399 OTHER CHARGES UTILITY BILLWG '
77.50 LOGIS STATE WAN CHARGE 217155 35891 5303.6399 OTHER CHARGES UTILITY BILLING I
133.30 LOGIS STATE WAN CHARGE 217155 35891 1040.6399 OTHER CHARGES DATA PROCESSING
23,964.41
1486 77123/2012 102703 M A ASSOCIATES ,
�I
i
' I
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/21/20129:16:24
Council Check Register Page - 2
11/16/2012 -11/23/2012
I
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subiedger Account Descrip6on Business Unit I !
801.11 FIRE-CLEANING SUPPLIES 216798 4918 1340.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE BLDG & GROUNDS MNTC
801.11
I
1487 11I2312072 138249 MINNESOTA ENVIRONMENTAL FUND I
44.50 MINNESOTA ENVIRONMENTAL FUND 217092 11191215531915 9000.2120 ACCRUED BENEFIT LIABILITY PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
44.50
1488 77/23/2072 718834 OPEN YOUR HEART �
125.50 OPEN YOUR HEART DEDUCTION 217088 11191215531911 9000.2120 ACCRUED BENEFIT LIABILITY PAYROLL CLEARING 8AL SHEET
125.50 ,
1489 71/23/2012 700280 POPP.COM f II ' i
3.77 GOLF LD ACCESS NOV 2012 217234 992067382 5145.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS GOLF SHOP BUILDING MAINTENANCE
3.77 IA2 LD ACCESS NOV 2072 217234 992067382 5265.6237 TELEPHONElPAGERS ARENA 2 BLDG MAINTENANCE-HAYES I
7.53 IA1 LD ACCESS NOV 2012 217234 992067382 5210.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS ARENA 1 BUILDING MAINTENANCE I
11.60 AVCC LD ACCESS NOV 2012 217234 992067382 1900.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS AV COMMUNITY CENTER I
15.17 REDWOOD LD ACCESS NOV 2012 217234 992067382 1730.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE I
41.84 I
1490 11/2312012 111665 PRZYBYLSKI, JOSEPH E I
60.00 STR-JEANS 216803 20121113 1600.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHINGALLOWANCE STREETMANAGEMENT
60.00
1497 11123/2072 100395 R& R SPECIALTIES OF WISCONSIN
35.87 GOLF-SHARPEN ZAMBONI BLADES 00035403 217117 510291N 5215.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT ARENA 1 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ,
35.88 GOLF-SHARPEN ZAMBONI BLADES 00035403 217117 510291N 5270.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT ARENA2 EQUIPMENT MAINT-HAYES I
7175
1492 11/23/2072 703192 SPRINT
70.28 INSP MOBILE PHONE OCT 217225 233995425105 1400.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS INSPECTIONS MANAGEMENT
34.29 ENG MOBILE PHONE OCT 217226 233995425105 1510.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS PW ENGINEERING & TECHNICAL ',
85.61 POL MOBILE PHONE OCT 217227 732773312131 1200,6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS POLICE MANAGEMENT ',
222.85 FIRE MOBILE PHONE OCT 217228 691466141073 1300.6237 TELEPHONElPAGERS FIRE MANAGEMENT I
.62 IT MOBILE PHONE OCT 217229 826258817059 1030.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY �
70.56 INSP MOBILE PHONE NOV 217230 233995425106 1400.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS INSPECTIONS MANAGEMENT �
34.29 ENG MOBILE PHONE NOV 217231 233995425106 1510.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS PW ENGINEERING & TECHNICAL
85.61 POL MOBILE PHONE NOV 217232 732773312132 1200.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS POLICE MANAGEMENT i
225.95 FIRE MOBILE PHONE NOV 217233 621466141074 1300.6237 TELEPHONElPAGERS FIRE MANAGEMENT
830.06 I
I
1493 17123I2012 142722 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, I
8,332.95 FLAGSTAFF AVE EXTENSION 217083 622679 � 4703.6235 2011105G CONSULTANT SERVICES FLAGSTAFF EXTEK 3 I
i
. 'I
GTYOFAPP� �tLEY 11/2 9:16:24
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register Page - 3
11/16l2012 -11f23/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier! Exp�anation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
5,535.80 CBL LAKE SOUTH SHORE 7TH 217084 622682 4502.6235 2012151G CONSULTANT SERVICES CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
5,911.10 147TH ST EXT-FLAGSTAFF TO JCRR 217085 622680 4712.6235 2011107G CONSULTANT SERVICES 147TH ST EXT FLAGSTF TO JCAKE
201.25 TRK STORMSEWER ANAYLIS 217101 639185 4502.6235 2012134G CONSULTANT SERVICES CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
209.55 CEMETERY-STAKE TREES 217101 639185 5705.6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES CEMETERY LANDSCAPE
209.55 GPS STAKING-7360 158TH ST EASE 217101 639195 1510.6235 CONSUITANT SERVICES PW ENGINEERING & TECHNICAL
948.75 GOLF PONDING OPTION ANAYLIS 217101 639185 5552.6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
1,438.00 2012 HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS 217101 639185 2027.6235 2013101G CONSULTANT SERVICES ROAD ESCROW
2,864.00 WELL NO 20 PUMPING FACILITY 217102 639186 5360.6235 2011113W CONSULTANT SERVICES CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
13,765.65 147TH ST EXT-FLAGSTAFF TO JCRR 217103 639187 4712.6235 2011107G CONSULTANT SERVICES 147TH ST EXT FLAGSTF TO JCAKE
3,470.95 AV BUSINESS CAMPUS 217104 639188 4712.6235 2011144R CONSULTANT SERVICES 147TH ST EXT FLAGSTF TO JCAKE
15,991.80 CORTLAND ADDN (FISCHER DR HORT 217105 639189 4502.6235 2012134G CONSULTANT SERVICES CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
397.15 EAGLE RIDGE BUSINESS PARK (LIF 217106 639190 4502.6235 2011141G CONSUITANT SERVICES CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
345.00 WELL NO 20 PUMPING FACILITY 217118 630291 5360.6235 2011113W CONSULTANT SERVICES CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
6,328.93 FLAGSTAFF AVE EXTENSION 217119 630292 4703.6235 2011105G CONSULTANT SERVICES FLAGSTAFF EXTENSION
6,614.96 147TH ST EXT-FLAGSTAFF TO JCRR 217120 630293 4712.6235 2011107G CONSULTANT SERVICES 147TH ST EXT FLAGSTF TO JCAKE
2,936.58 CBL LAKE SOUTH SHORE 7TH 217121 630294 4502.6235 2012151G CONSULTANT SERVICES CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
2,019.35 2012 LONG LAKE RETROFIT BMP'S 217122 630295 5552.6235 2011143D CONSULTANT SERVICES CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
5,443.59 AV BUSINESS CAMPUS 217123 630296 4712.6235 2011144R CONSULTANT SERVICES 147TH ST EXT FLAGSTF TO JCAKE
82,964.91 ,
1494 11/2312012 137686 TOWMASTER
1,417.16 STR-TARPS 216799 343378 1630.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS STREET EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ;
1,417.16 '
1495 11/23/2012 100478 TRANS ALARM INC
9,900.68 GOLF-SECURITY SYSTEM HARDWA�51183 216800 121263TAFS 5190.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF CLUBHOUSE CONSTRUCTION
9,900.68
1496 71/23/2012 700496 VAN PAPER CO
3.03- DISCT#1 00008795 216805 255289 5025.6333 GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS LIQUOR #1 OPERATIONS
302.77 BAGS#1 00008795 216805 255289 5025.6229 GENERAL SUPPIIES LIQUOR #1 OPERATIONS
1.20- DISCT#2 00008795 216806 255313 5065.6333 GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS LIQUOR #2 OPERATIONS
120.30 BAG#2 00008795 216806 255313 5065.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR #2 OPERATIONS
418.84
7497 11123@012 100504 VOSS LIGHTING
154.66 STR-BULBS 00069079 216801 1521474400 1610.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET/BOULEVARD REPAIR & MNTC
154.66
1498 11l23/2012 100363 XCEL ENERGY
159.94 UTIL-LIGHTS 216804 445996606 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND
159.94
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/21/20129:16:24
R55CKREG LOG20000 '
Council Check Register Page - 4 �
11/16/2012 -11/23l2012 I
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No I�v No Account No Subiedge Account Description Business Unit
1499 11I2312072 100528 ZIEGLER INC i
26.13 WQ-PIN, RETAINER 00035447 276802 PC001422797 5505.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS STORM DRAIN UTILITY
26.13
249887 17/21/2012 143732 GEIS, CAROLINE
102.00 REF OVPMT UTIL 8324 144TH ST W 216814 20121116 5301.4997 WATER/SEWER ACCT REFUNDS WATER & SEWER FUND REVENUE
102.00
249888 11/2712072 143733 SALCHERT, JESSIE
47.11 REF OVPMT UTIL 14793 EMBRY PTH 276815 20121116 5307.4997 WATER/SEWER ACCT REFUNDS WATER & SEWER FUND REVENUE
47.11 I I
249889 11/21I2012 143734 YAREMCHUK, IVAN
19.23 REF OVPMT UTIL 7400 157TH ST W 216816 20121116 5301.4997 WATER/SEWER ACCT REFUNDS WATER & SEWER FUND REVENUE
19.23
249890 11/21/2072 100255 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR
1,242.63 WINE#1 00000109 216617 1418735 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
154.40 WINE#1 00000109 216818 1418742 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
6,174.98 WINE#1 00000109 216819 1424231 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
5,063.05 WINE#1 00000109 216820 1424234 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
4,711.91 WINE#7 00000109 216821 1424240 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
72.00 WINE#2 00000109 216822 1418738 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
705.65 WINE#2 00000109 216823 1418744 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
252.69 WINE#2 00000109 216824 1418746 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
502.44 WINE#2 00000109 216825 1418749 5055.6520 VNNE LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
212.73 WINE#2 00000109 216826 1419697 5055.6520 VNNE LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
165.50 WINE#2 00000109 216827 1418754 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
1,421.35 WINE#2 00000109 216828 1424236 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
1,337.98 WINElt2 00000109 216829 1424242 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
2,441.91 WINE#2 00000109 216830 1424245 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
115.80 WINE#2 00000109 216831 1429410 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
183.60 WINE#2 00000109 216832 1429415 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
385.50 LIQ#3 00000109 216833 1418755 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
3,539.70 WINE#3 00000109 216634 1424238 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
5,597.27 WINE#3 00000109 216835 1424247 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
3,943.91 WINE#3 00000109 216836 1424251 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
15.88- CMWINE#2 00000109 216837 552737 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
31.76- CMWINE#2 00000109 216838 552735 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
36.00- CMWINE#3 00000109 216839 549063 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
32.00- CMWINE#3 00000109 216840 552921 '' 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR #3 STOCK �'�-IASES
CITYOFAPF. �LLEY 11/� 9:16:24
R55CKREG L��20000
Councii Check Register Page - 5
11/16/2012 -11/23/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
20.80- CMVNNE#3 00000109 216841 552738 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
10.40- CMWINE#3 00000109 216842 552739 5085.6520 1MNE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
11.03- CMWINE#3 00000109 216843 552740 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
24.84- CMVNNE#3 00000109 216844 552742 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
41.98 BEER#1 00000109 216845 1418736 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
62.97 BEER#1 00000109 216846 1424232 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES i
30.25 TAX#3 00000109 216847 1418752 5085.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
1,488.35 LIQ#1 00000109 216848 1418739 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES ,
5,132.40 LIQ#1 00000109 216849 1418730 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES �i
3,886.77 LIQ#1 00000109 216850 1418734 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
9,794.92 LIQ#1 00000109 216851 1418740 5015.6510 LIQUOR IIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES i
3,327.41 LIQ#1 00000109 216852 1418741 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
32,872.19 LIQ#1 00000109 216853 1424229 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
498.00 LIQ#1 00000109 216854 1424230 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES I
1,822.60 LIQ#2 00000109 216855 1418731 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
925.50 LIQ#2 00000109 216856 1418743 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
552.78 LIQ#2 00000109 216857 1418745 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
5,701.77 LIQ#2 00000109 216858 1418747 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
529.14 LIQ#2 00000109 216859 1418748 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
200.00 LIQ#2 00000109 216860 1424241 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
8,329.50 LIQ#2 00000109 216861 1424243 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
348.56 LIQ#2 00000109 216862 1424244 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
2,502.10 lIQ#3 00000109 216863 1418732 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
646.37 LIQ#3 00000109 216864 1418750 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
611.08 LIQ#3 00000109 216865 1418753 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
8,481.91 LIQ#3 00000109 216866 1418751 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
299.84 LIQ#3 00000109 216867 1424246 5085,6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
28,723.24 LIQ#3 00000109 216868 1424249 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
990.00 LIQ#3 00000109 216869 1424250 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
156,032.92
249891 71121@012 141622 OLVALDE FARM 8 BREWING
168.00 BEER#1 00050839 216870 536 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
336.00 BEER#3 00050839 216871 541 5085.6530 BEER LIGlUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
504.00
249892 11121/2012 100296 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MIN - BEER INC
4,004.65 BEER#1 00000105 216872 962648 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
168.00 BEER#1 00000105 216873 962650 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
16.00- CMBEER#1 00000105 216874 184 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES ,
1,963.20 BEER#1 00000105 216875 964668 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES i
i
I
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/21l2012 9:16:24
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register Page - s ,
11/16/2012 -11/23/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
3,184.80 BEER#1 00000105 216876 965730 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
288.00 BEER#1 0000010b 216877 967749 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
1,382.80 BEER#1 00000105 216878 967748 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
31.50- CMBEER#7 00000105 216879 237 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
2,407.25 BEER#1 00000105 216880 968833 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
1,122.40 BEER#1 00000105 216881 970886 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
3,329.80 BEER#1 00000105 216882 971954 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
140.00 BEER#1 00000105 216883 973532 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES �
1,190.29 BEER#1 00000105 216884 974037 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
288.00 BEER#7 00000105 216885 974038 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
304.00 BEER#1 00000105 216886 974651 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
4,033.10 BEER#1 00000105 216887 975237 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
161.50 BEER#1 00000105 216888 975238 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
21.50 TAX#1 00000105 216889 962649 5015.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
23.50 TAX#1 00000105 216890 965731 5015.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
26.10 TAX#1 00000105 216891 970887 5015.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
2,725.80 BEER#2 00000105 216892 963201 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
96.90 BEER#2 00000105 216893 963202 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
187.00 BEER#2 00000105 216894 963203 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
2,128.00 BEER#2 00000105 216895 966243 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
120.00 BEER#2 00000105 216896 966244 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
982.60 BEER#2 00000105 216897 969348 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
109.00 BEER#2 00000105 216898 969350 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
3,983.40 BEER#2 00000105 216899 972501 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
288.90 BEER#2 00000105 216900 972502 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
78.00 BEER#2 00000105 216901 972503 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
2,562.50 BEER#2 00000105 216902 975791 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
109.00 BEER#2 00000105 216903 975793 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
4.00- CMBEER#2 00000105 216904 310 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES '
32.00 TAX#2 00000105 216905 969349 5055.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
78.00 TAX#2 00000105 216906 969351 5055.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LI(lUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
21.50 TAX#2 00000105 216907 975792 5055.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE IIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
2,487.65 BEER#3 00000105 216908 963905 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
120.00 BEER#3 00000105 216909 963906 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
2,135.45 BEER#3 00000105 216910 966974 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
63.00 BEER#3 00000105 216911 966975 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
2,582.01 BEER#3 00000105 216912 970103 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
4,336.01 BEER#3 00000105 216913 973273 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
216.00 BEER#3 00000105 216914 973275 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES �
140.00 BEER#3 00000105 216915 973537 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES I
,. 3,257.85 BEER#3 00000105 216916 976589 �_ 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES I I
i ��
' I
CITY OF AP�. .LLEY 11/e 9:16:24
R55CKREG LVG20000
Council Check Register Page - 7
11/16l2012 —11/23l2012
Check # Date Amount Suppiier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description , Business Unit
288.00 BEER#3 00000105 216917 976590 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
51.00 TAX#3 00000105 216918 970104 5085.6540 TAXABIE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
23.50 TAX#3 00000105 216919 973274 5085.6540 TAXAB�E MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
53,190.46
249893 1112112012 100009 AFSCME COUNCIL #5
1,950.24 UNION DUES AFSCME 217235 121102W 90002120 ACCRUED BENEFIT LIABILITY PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
1,950.24
249894 11/2112012 101437 HEALTH FUND, THE
128.50 HEALTH FUND DEDUCTION 217087 11191215531910 9000.2120 ACCRUED BENEFIT LIABILITY PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET �
128.50
249895 1712712012 143373 HARRIS, KIM '
16.65 CLERK-MILEAGE NOV 217150 20121113 1015.6275 SCHOOLSlCONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
16.65
249896 71121I2012 142900 CANNON CONSTRUCTION, INC.
9,686.35 VALLEYWOOD CLUBHOUSE 216930 7 5190.6810 2011137G CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS GOLF CLUBHOUSE CONSTRUCTION
9,686.35
249897 11/21/2012 143735 DASCOM SYSTEMS GROUP, LLC
26,734.62 VALLEYWOOD CLUBHOUSE 216922 1 5190.6810 2011137G CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS GOLP CLUBHOUSE CONSTRUCTION
26,734.62
249898 17/2112072 143449 PREMIER RESTAURANT EQUIPMENT C
12,827.85 VALLEYWOOD CLUBHOUSE 216925 4 5190.6810 2071137G CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS GOLF CLUBHOUSE CONSTRUCTION
12,827.85
249899 17121I2072 143038 PRIOR LAKE BLACKTOP, INC.
42,807.26 VALLEYWOOD CLUBHOUSE 216921 6 5190.6810 2011137G CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS GOLF CLUBHOUSE CONSTRUCTION
42,807.26
249900 11127I2012 142815 REGAL CONTRACTORS INC. I
806.55 VALLEYWOOD CLUBHOUSE 216928 8 5190.6810 2011137G CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS GOLF CLUBHOUSE CONSTRUCTION ,
I
806.55
249901 11121/2012 142899 SCHAMMEL ELECTRIC, INC.
3,035.25 VALLEYWOOD CLUBHOUSE 216923 8 5190.6810 2011137G CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS GOLF CLUBHOUSE CONSTRUCTION
3,035.25
249902 11/21I2012 743736 SMB OF MINNESOTA
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/21/20129:16:24
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register Pa9e $
11/16/2012 -11/23/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Descrip6on Business Unit
5,605.00 VALLEYWOOD CLUBHOUSE 216924 1 5190.6810 2011137G CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS GOLF CLUBHOUSE CONSTRUCTION
5,605.00
249903 1112712012 143421 TECTA AMERICA STOCK ROFFING LL
13,629.65 VALLEYWOOD CLUBHOUSE 216929 2 5190.6810 2011137G CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS GOLF CLUBHOUSE CONSTRUCTION
13,629.65
249904 11/2712072 142738 THURNBECK STEEL FABRICATION, 1
1,425.00 VAILEYWOOD CLUBHOUSE 216920 110405 5190.6810 2011137G CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS GOLF CLUBHOUSE CONSTRUCTION
1,425.00
249905 11/21/2012 101309 WASCHE COMMERCIAL FINISHES INC
60.80 VALLEYWOOD CLUBHOUSE 216926 4 5190.6810 2011137G CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS GOLF CLUBHOUSE CONSTRUCTION �
60.80
249906 17I21/2072 142816 WTG TERAZ20 d� TILE, INC.
835.05 VALLEYWOOD CIUBHOUSE 216927 6 5190.6810 2011137G CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS GOLF CLUBHOUSE CONSTRUCTION
635.05
249907 11120/2012 109187 AA EQUIPMENT CO
15,916.63 COOLER DOOR REPLACEMENT FINAL 277037 4106 5065.6720 CAPITAL OUTLAY-FURNITURE & FIX LIQUOR #2 OPERATIONS
15,916.63
249908 11/2012072 142827 ANCHOR PROMOTIONS
924.04 FIRE-BANNERS/AVFD TUMBLERS 216807 20121001 1320.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE PREVENTION
924.04
249909 11/20@012 700027 APACHE GROUP I
3.26- AVCC-DISCOUNT 00051260 217038 160433 1900.6333 GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS AV COMMUNITY CENTER !
2.44- IA2-DISCOUNT 00051260 217038 160433 5265.6333 GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS ARENA2 BLDG MAINTENANCE-HAYES
1.63- HCSC-OISCOUNT 00051260 217038 160433 1920.6333 GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS HAYES COMMUNITY 8 SENIOR CTR
.81- PK-DISCOUNT 00051260 217038 160433 1730.6333 GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE
67.15 PK-Gf1R6 BAGS, T. PAPER, P. TOW 00051260 217038 160433 1730.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE
174.30 HCSC-GARB BAGS, T.PAPER, P.TOV�00051260 217038 160433 1920.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES HAYES COMMUNITY & SENIOR CTR
261.46 IA2-GARB BAGS, T. PAPER, P. TO 00051260 217038 160433 5265.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA 2 BLDG MAINTENANCE-HAYES
348.63 AVCC-GARB BAGS, T.PAPER, P.TOVW0051260 217038 160433 1900.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES AV COMMUNITY CENTER
863.40
249910 11/20@012 700978 APPLE VALLEY RENTAL
340.94 CLERK-TRUCK RENTAL-VOTING SEUCy062934 216808 186051 1015.6310 RENTAL EXPENSE CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
340.94 '
1
' � �I
CITYOFAPP� .LLEY 11/i 9:16:24
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register Page - 9
11/16/2012 -11/23l2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Expiana PO # Doc No inv No Account No Subledge Account Descrip6on Business Unit
249911 11120/2012 100747 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES INC
25.22 SHOP-UNIFORM RENT OCT 00046863 217039 6297610638 1530.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE CMF SHOP EQUIP MNTC & REPAIR
25.22 STR-UNIFORMRENTOCT 00046863 217039 6297610638 1600.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHINGALLOWANCE STREETMANAGEMENT
25.22 PK-UNIFORM RENT OCT 00046863 217039 6297610638 1710.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE PARK MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT
25.23 UTIL-UNIFORM RENT OCT 00046863 217039 6297610638 5305.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE WATER MGMT/REPORT/DATA ENTRY
25.22 SHOP-UNIFORM RENT NOV 00046863 217040 6297615516 1530.6281 UNIFORM(CLOTHING ALLOWANCE CMF SHOP EQUIP MNTC & REPAIR
25.22 STR-UNIFORM RENT NOV 00046863 217040 6297615516 1600.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHINGALLOWANCE STREET MANAGEMENT
25.22 PK-UNIFORM RENT NOV 00046863 217040 6297615516 1710.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE PARK MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT
25.23 UTIL-UNIFORM RENT NOV 00046863 217040 6297615516 5305.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE WATER MGMT/REPORT/DATA ENTRY
201.78
249912 11I20/2012 701558 ASPHALT SURFACE TECHNOLOGIES C
52,052.69 2012 MICRO SURFACING 217041 201210202 2027.6810 2012102R CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS ROAD ESCROW
52,052.69
249913 11/2012012 141748 BASER & PL UMPIRES
127.50 REC-SOFTBAL UMP 10/10/12 216809 20121029 1850.6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES REC SOFTBALL
127.50
249914 11/20/2012 100709 BATTERIES PLUS
34.73 UTIL-BATTERY EASEMENT MACHIN�0068097 216810 17267764 5390.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS SWR EQUIPNEHICLE MISC MNTClRP
83.11 FIRE-AKALINE C BATTERIES 00035612 216811 17268399 1330.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS FIRE OPERATIONS
117.84 I
24991b 71/2012012 100054 BAUER BUILT (NC
241.67 GOLF-TUBE, TIRE RPRS 00067289 217042 180076584 5155.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT GOLF EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
241.67
249976 77I20/2012 742897 BOLTON & MENK, INC.
4,761.00 FLAGSTAFF AV & CSAH 42 IMPROVE 217077 151470 4502.6235 2012112G CONSULTANT SERVICES CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
4,761.00
249917 11120/2012 100069 BOSSARDT CORPORATION
3,301.73 VALLEYWOOD CLUBHOUSE 217043 10591 5190.6235 2011137G CONSULTANT SERVICES GOLF CLUBHOUSE CONSTRUCTION I
1,113.51 VALLEYWOOD CLUBHOUSE 217044 10592 5190.6235 2011137G CONSULTANT SERVICES GOLF CLUBHOUSE CONSTRUCTION
4,415.24 ,
249918 1712012012 1000T2 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION
2,576.25 147TH ST EXT-FLAGSTAFF TO JCRR 216931 361248 4712.6235 2011107C CONSULTANT SERVICES 147TH ST EXT FLAGSTF TO JCAKE
5,678.38 CORTLAND ADDN (FISCHER-D.R. HO 216932 361249 4502.6235 2012134G CONSULTANT SERVICES CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
527.00 FLAGSTAFF AVE EXTENSION 216933 261247 2027.6235 2011105G CONSULTANT SERVICES ROAD ESCROW
788.25 AV BUSINESS CAMPUS 217078 361155 4712.6235 2011144R CONSULTANT SERVICES 147TH ST EXT FLAGSTF TO JCAKE
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/21/20129:1624
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register Page - 10
11/16/2012 -11l23/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
1,835.25 AV BUSINESS CAMPUS 217079 360688 4712.6235 2011144R CONSULTANT SERVICES 147TH ST EXT FLAGSTF TO JCAKE
1,488.00 GARRETTAVE IMPROVEMENTS 217080 360684 2027.6235 2012101R CONSULTANT SERVICES ROAD ESCROW
12,893.13
249979 17/20/2072 121014 BUCKEYE CLEANING CENTER
129.01 AVCC-ODOR ELIMINATOR 00050039 216812 702571 1900.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES AV COMMUNITY CENTER
129.01
249920 17120/2012 100100 CNH ARCHITECTS
7,866.51 VALLEYWOOD CLUBHOUSE 217045 9480 5190.6235 2011137G CONSULTANT SERVICES GOLF CLUBHOUSE CONSTRUCTION
7,866.51
249921 11/20/2012 100314 COCA-COLA REFRESHMENTS USA, IN
195.45 GOLF-KTN POP 00014126 217046 168481818 5120.6421 GOLF-NON ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES GOLF KITCHEN
256.04 GOLF-KTN POP 00014126 217047 16848135 5120.6421 GOLF-NON ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES GOLF KITCHEN �,
11.70- GOLF-KTN POP, CREDIT 00014126 217048 158557944 5120.6421 GOLF-NON ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES GOLF KITCHEN '
128.12 GOLF-KTN POP 00014126 217049 188517811 5120.6421 GOLF-NON ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES GOLF KITCHEN
567.91
249922 77/2012012 722849 DAKOTA COMMUNICATIONS CENTER
68,452.00 POL DCC FEE - DEC 217151 AV201212 1200.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES POLICE MANAGEMENT
68,452.00
249923 17/2012012 128708 DAKOTA COUNTY
365.96 FORF VEH-99 GMC JIMAAY 217050 C5534 2062.6399 OTHER CHARGES POLICE CRIME
385.96
249924 11/20/2072 700128 DAKOTA ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION
8.72 POL GARDENVIEW SPEED SIGN 217192 28666 1210.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC POLICE FIELD OPERATIONS/PATROL
10.90 PARK BLMTAERTR/FNDRS LT 217192 28666 1720.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE '
30.46 UTIL RADIO EQUIPMENT 217192 28666 5805.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND �
30.47 PW RADIO EQUIPMENT 217192 28666 1540.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC CMF BUILDINGS & GROUNDS MNTC
49.05 CIVIL DEFENSE SIRENS 217192 28666 1290.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC CIVIL DEFENSE MANAGEMENT
69.00 CEMETERY IIGHTS 217192 28666 5605.6255 UTILITIES-EIECTRIC CEMETERY
202.21 KELLEY PARK POND/SPRINKLER 217192 28666 1720.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE
270.78 PARK TENNIS COURTS 217192 28666 1745.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC PARK CRT/GAME AREA MAINTENANCE
321.35 AQUATIC CENTER 217192 28666 1940.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC AQUATIC SWIM CENTER
360.51 CMF STORAGE/SALT BLDG 217192 28666 1540.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC CMF BUILDINGS & GROUNDS MNTC
483.02 PARK HS4 FIELDS 217192 28666 1780.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC PARK HIGH SCHOOL #4 FIELDS
698.99 LIQUOR STORE #2 217192 28666 5065.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC LIQUOR #2 OPERATIONS
' 1,076.80 UTIL STORM SEWER 217192 28666 5805.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND
1,181.42 UTIL SIGNAL LIGHTS 217192 28666 `. 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTP °UND
R55CKREG LiJG20000 CITYOFAPPt .LLEY 11l� ;9:16:24
Council Check Register Page - 11
11/16/2012 -11/23/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No I�v No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
1,230.04 HAYES COMM & SENIOR CENTER 217192 28666 1920.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC HAYES COMMUNITY & SENIOR CTR
1,338.86 PARK PATHWAY LiGHTS 217192 28666 1740.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC PARK SIDEWALK/PATH MAINTENANCE
1,361.82 IIQUOR STORE #1 217192 28666 5025.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC LIQUOR #1 OPERATIONS
1,480.32 PARK BUILDINGS 217192 28666 1730.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC PARK BUILDiNG MAINTENANCE
1,553.66 FIRE STATIONS 217192 28666 1340.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC FIRE BLDG & GROUNDS MNTC
1,656.73 LIQUOR STORE #3 217192 28666 5095.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC LIQUOR #3 OPERATIONS
1,661.30 AVFAC EXPANSION 217192 28666 1940.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC AQUATIC SWIM CENTER
2,010.82 ICE ARENA 1 217192 28666 5210.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC ARENA 1 BUILDING MAINTENANCE
2,087.65 UTIL LIFT STATIONS 217192 28666 5380.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC SEWER LIFT STN REPAIR & MNTC '
2,968.97 AVCC 217192 28666 1900.6255 UTILITIES-ELEC7RIC AV COMMUNITY CENTER
5,267.26 ATHLETIC COMPLEX 217192 28666 1715.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC PARKATHLETIC FIEID MAINTENANC
5,690.07 HAYES PARKARENA 217192 28666 5265.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC ARENA2 BLDG MAINTENANCE-HAYES
17,161.67 UTIL WELLS 217192 28666 5320.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/RPR
30,386.48 UTIL STREET UGHTS 277192 28666 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND �
2,152.83 CMF 217193 28506 1540.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC CMF BUILDINGS 8 GROUNDS MNTC
3,884J5 UTIL WELLS 217193 28506 5320.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC WATER WELUBOOSTER STN MNT/RPR
4,894.20 MUNICIPAL CENTER 217193 28506 1060.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC MUNICIPAL BLDG 8 GROUNDS MNTC
11,414.59 WATER TREATMENT PLANT 217193 28506 5325.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC WATER TREATMENT FCLTY MNTC/RPR j
8.72 POL HEYWOOD CT SPEED SIGN 217194 28742 1210.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC POLICE FIELD OPERATIONS/PATROL
11.83 PK GARDEN VIEW DR SHELTER 217194 28742 1730.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE
15.87 REDWOOD PK REST ROOMS 217194 28742 1730.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE
71.95 STREET LIGHTS 217194 28742 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND
910.29 VALLEYWOOD GOLF SPRINKLER 217195 28494 5150.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC GOLF COURSE MAINTENANCE ,
2.19 147TH STREET W LIGHTS 277196 4987608 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND '
104,016.55 I,
249925 11I20/2012 100434 DOUGHERTY MOLENDA SOLFEST HILL
360.00 GENERAL CRIMINAL-OCT 216934 131539 1055.6231 LEGAL SERVICES IEGAL PROSECUTING ATTORNEY
2,362.11 CONVICTIONAPPEAL-OCT 216935 131540 1055.6231 LEGALSERVICES LEGALPROSECUTINGATTORNEY
92.65 GENERAL CIVIL MATTERS-OCT 216936 131619 1050.6231 LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL GENERAL SERVICES
380.34 GENERAL LEGAL-ALLEN, JORGE 216937 131620 1050.6231 LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL GENERAL SERVICES '
135.9D 07-354 157TH STREET SIGNAL 216939 131621 4384.6810 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS 07-354 157TH STREET SIGNAL I
145.25 GENERAL LEGAL-VOICESTREAM LEAS 216939 131622 1050.6231 LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL GENERAI SERVICES
298.98 08-392 CEDAR AVE CORRIDOR STUD 216940 131623 4037.6810 2008107G CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS 08-392 CEDAR AVE CORRIDOR
380.52 KELLEY PARK EXPANSION 216941 131624 2017.6810 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS PARK DEDICATION
41.50 LEGAL-CLEARWIRE TOWERS 216942 131625 1050.6231 LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL GENERAL SERVICES
407.70 TIF DISTRICTS-GENERAL 216943 131626 4717.6231 LEGAL SERVICES VALLEY BUSINESS PARK-SPOWD ',
597.96 MVTA JPAAMENDMENT 216944 131627 1050.6231 LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL GENERAL SERVICES
456.50 AV BUSINESS CAMPUS 216945 131628 4902.6231 2011144R LEGAL SERVICES PHYSICAL IMPROVEMENTS ESCROW
62.25 CBL LAKE SOUTH SHORE 6TH 216946 731629 4502.6231 2011148G LEGAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
217.44 CODE VIOLATIONS-MISC 216947 131630 1050.6231 LEGAL SERVICES LEGAI GENERAL SERVICES ,
I
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/21/20129:16:24
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register Page - 12
11/16/2012 -11/23/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit ,
1,141.25 VARIANCES-GENERAL 216948 131631 1050.6231 LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL GENERAL SERVICES
62.25 COBBLESTONE COMMERCIAL 216949 131632 4502.6231 2012151G LEGAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
163.08 LITIGATION-GENERAL 216950 131633 1055.6231 LEGALSERVICES LEGALPROSECUTINGATTORNEY
3,735.00 LEGACY N& TITAN DEV ADMIN 216951 131634 4719.6231 2012150G LEGAL SERVICES LEGACY-IMH
3,050.25 CORTLAND ADDN (FISCHER-D.R. HO 216952 131635 4502.6231 2012134G LEGAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
601.75 CUB FOODS ADDN 216953 131636 4902.6231 LEGAL SERVICES PHYSICAL IMPROVEMENTS ESCROW
640.50 CBL LAKE SOUTH SHORE 7TH 216954 131637 4502.6231 2012151G LEGAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
530.01 AMEND ALLINA LEASE 216955 131638 1050.6231 LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL GENERAL SERVICES
767.16 LITIGATION-GENERAL 216956 131639 1055.6231 LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL PROSECUTING ATTORNEY
682.50 FORF VEH-02 DODGE DURANGO 216957 C5534 2062.6399 OTHER CHARGES POLICE CRIME
494.04 FORF VEH-02 PONTIAC BONNEVILLE 216958 C5534 2062.6399 OTHER CHARGES POLICE CRIME
770.79 FORF VEH-04 CHRYSLTER PT CRUIS 216959 C5534 2062.6399 OTHER CHARGES POLICE CRIME
18,577.68 I
249926 11I20/2012 100148 DPC INDUSTRIES INC '
467.00 UTIL-CHLORINE 00048450 217124 8270210212 5325.6214 CHEMICALS WATER TREATMENT FCLTY MNTC/RPR
467.00
249927 17120/2012 107403 ENEBAK CONSTRUCTION
827.92 EAGLE RIDGE BUSINESS PK 217051 201114105&FINAL 4502.6810 2011141G CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
1,264.97 EAGLE RIDGE BUSINESS PK 217051 201114105&FINAL 5360.6810 2011141W CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
1,381.29 EAGLE RIDGE BUSINESS PK 217051 201114105&FINAL 4502.6810 2011141G CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
13,075.68 EAGLE RIDGE BUSINESS PK 217051 2011141058FINAL 4502.6810 2011141G CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS '
13,252.84 EAGLE RIDGE BUSINESS PK 217051 201114105&FINAL 4502.6810 2011141G CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS ,
29,802.70
249928 11/20/2012 100420 FISCHER MINING, LLC
286.70 UTIL-GRAVEL, FILL SAND RPRS 13 00035242 217052 5211 5330.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES WTR MAIN/HYDRANT/CURB STOP MNT
273.37 UTIL-GRAVEL, FILL SAND RPRS 13 00035242 217053 5212 5330.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES WTR MAIN/HYDRANT/CURB STOP MNT
500.07
249929 11/20/2012 100184 FRIEDGES LANDSCAPING INC
11.63 PK-SOD 217125 85468 1715.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARKATHLETIC FIELD MAINTENANC
420.82 PK-SOD, PALLET 217126 85448 1715.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARKATHLETIC FIELD MAINTENANC i
432.45
249930 11/20@012 100769 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF MN
66.72 AVCC PHONES 217177 952953231702179 1900.6237 TEIEPHONE/PAGERS AV COMMUNITY CENTER
97 I
49.87 GOLF CLUBHOUSE PHONES 217178 952953231904129 5110.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS GOLF CLUBHOUSE BUILDING I
47 I
142.95 PK JCRP PHONES 217179 9529532349041 '': 1730.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS PARK BUILDING M/ VANCE ',
CITYOFAPP'. .LLEY 11/� 9:1624
R55CKREG Lvv20000
Council Check Register Page - 13
11/16/2012 -11/23/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
47
347.34 PK RW PHONES 217180 952953235004139 1730.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE
47
206.23 IA2 PHONES 217181 952953236511019 5265.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS ARENA 2 BLDG MAINTENANCE-HAYES
57
252.61 IA1 PHONES 217182 952953236604149 5210.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS ARENA 1 BUILDING MAINTENANCE
47
173.24 TEEN CTR PHONES 217183 952953238502179 1730.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE
97
204.21 SWIM CTR PHONES 217184 952953239405100 1940.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS AQUATIC SWIM CENTER
67
232.78 UTIL MNTC PHONE 217185 952953235508170 5305.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS WATER MGMT/REPORT/DATA ENTRY
47
202.44 UTIL WTP PHONES 217186 952431508111088 5325.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS WATER TREATMENT FCLTY MNTC/RPR
97
70.52 UTIL STRM SWR ALARMS 217187 651197340501279 5385.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES SEWER STORM INFRASTRUCTURE
97
35.26 CMF RADIO LINE 217188 651197403911269 1540.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS CMF BUILDINGS & GROUNDS MNTC
27
68.29 DCTC PHONE 277189 952953253410100 2092.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS DAKOTATECHNICAL BLDG ESCROW
17
169.81 CH GENERATOR/HVAC MODEM 217190 952953273409250 1060.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS MUNICIPAL BLDG & GROUNDS MNTC
07
17.63 POL INTOXILIZER 217191 651101065412229 1250.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS POLICE FACILITY
37
2,239.90
249931 11/20/2012 700510 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD
565.16 UTIL-NOZZLES, ORINGS 00035250 217054 5699919 5330.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS WTR MAIN/HYDRANT/CURB STOP MNT
173.09 UTIL-LOWER VAIVE WASHER 00035250 217055 5700056 5330.6215 EQUIPMENT PARTS WTR MAIN/HYDRANT/CURB STOP MNT
738.25
249932 11/2012012 10284T HOWLAND'S IKON
1.06 IA1-EMBROIDER ON CUSTOMER SUOTf045237 217056 120786 5205.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING AILOWANCE ARENA 1 MANAGEMENT
1.62 CH-EMBROIDER ON CUSTOMER SU�UD95237 217056 120786 1060.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE MUNICIPAL BLDG & GROUNDS MNTC
1.62 AVCGEMBROIDER ON CUSTOMER 80An5237, 217056 120786 1900.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE AV COMMUNITY CENTER
1.62 ENG-EMBROIDER ON CUSTOMER SmADR5237 217056 120786 1510.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE PW ENGINEERING & TECHNICAL
2.13 GOLF-EMBROIDER ON CUSTOMER 8�Qd5237 217056 120786 5105.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE GOLF MANAGEMENT
2.66 NR-EMBROIDER ON CUSTOMER SU�O_45237 217056 120786 1520.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE NATURAL RESOURCES
2.66 INSP-EMBROIDER ON CUSTOMER 310845237 217056 120786 1400.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE INSPECTIONS MANAGEMENT
3.73 SHOP-EMBROIDER ON CUSTOMER �IIDR5237 217056 120786 1530.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE CMF SHOP EQUIP MNTC 8 REPAIR
CITY OFAPPLE VALLEY 11/21/20129:1624
R55CKREG LOG20000 I
Councif Check Register Page - 14
11/16/2012 -11/23/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
5.33 UTII-EMBROIDER ON CUSTOMER SQQ045237 217056 120786 5365.6281 UNIFORMlCLOTHING ALLOWANCE SEWER MGMT/REPORTS/DATA ENTRY
5.33 UTIL-EMBROIDER ON CUSTOMER S�D45237 217056 120786 5305.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE WATER MGMT/REPORT/DATA ENTRY i
12.81 PK-EMBROIDER ON CUSTOMER SUB�45237 217056 120786 1710.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE PARK MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT 'i
12.81 STR-EMBROIDER ON CUSTOMER S0�F5237 217056 120786 1600.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE STREET MANAGEMENT �
50.D0 UTII-TWlll. JACKET 00045237 217056 120786 5305.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE WATER MGMT/REPORT/DATA ENTRY
52.00 STR-BASEBALL JACKET 00045237 217056 120786 1600.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE STREET MANAGEMENT
52,00 UTIL-BASEBALL JACKET 00045237 217056 120786 5305.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE WATER MGMT/REPORT/DATA ENTRY
65.00 STR-TWILL JACKET 00045237 217056 120786 1600.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE STREET MANAGEMENT
272.38
249933 71/20/2012 112349 HOWRY RESIDENTIAL SERVICES, IN
90.00 REFUND AVCC RENTAL FEE 12/13 217237 ACTIVENET 1001.5115 RENTS-APPLE VA�LEY COMM CENTERGENERAL FUND REVENUE
90.00
249934 11I2012012 103314 INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS
106.53 CLERK-SPECIAL ORDER LABELS 00040444 217197 IN0127124 1015.6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
147.22 POL-COMPATIBLE TONER FOR DELI00040473 277198 IN0137445 1200.6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE MANAGEMENT
82.41 LIQ1-CUPS, TOWELS, CLEANERS 00040444 217199 IN0138350 5025.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR #1 OPERATIONS
12.47 NR-CALCULATOR 00040444 217200 IN0139283 1520.6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES NATURAL RESOURCES
25.44 CABLE-CD/DVD SLIM CASE 00040444 217201 IN0140211 1970.6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES CABLE TV
94.24 FIN-MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 00040444 217202 IN0140211 1035.6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES FINANCE
265.84 POL-MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 00040473 217203 IN0140212 1200.6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE MANAGEMENT
61.56- POL-PENS RETURNED 00040473 217204 SCN006503 1200.6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE MANAGEMENT I
52.01 POL-PENS 00040473 217205 IN0142253 1200.6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE MANAGEMENT
56.11 AVCC-CLEANING SUPPLIES 00040444 217206 IN0143011 1900.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES AV COMMUNITY CENTER
22.25 AVCC-CALENDAR, APPT BOOK 00040444 217207 IN0143012 1900.6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES AV COMMUNITY CENTER
5.95 POL-CALENDAR 00040473 217208 IN0143118 1200.6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE MANAGEMENT
9.05 FIN-HOLDER, LEAD PENCILS 00040444 217209 IN0143119 1035.6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES FINANCE I
54.93 POL-MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 00040473 217210 IN0145166 1200.6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE MANAGEMENT I
92.51 PW-FOLDERSIPENS/PADlBOOKENDH�D040444 217211 IN0148803 1500.6210 OFFICE SUPPUES PW MANAGEMENT
269.29 CH-CLEANING SUPPLIES 00040444 217212 IN0148804 1060.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES MUNICIPAL BLDG & GROUNDS MNTC '
47.19 AVCC-MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 00040444 217213 IN0149715 1900.6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES AV COMMUNITY CENTER �
81.63 HCSC-MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 00040444 217214 IN0149823 1920.6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES HAYES COMMUNITY 8 SENIOR CTR '
111.79 POL-DVD LABELS, FILE FOLDERS 00040473 277215 IN0150896 1200.6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES POIICE MANAGEMENT
69.75 FIN-MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 00040444 217216 IN0150899 1035.6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES FINANCE
40.95 LIQ1-CUPS, LINERS 00040444 217217 IN0152774 5025.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR #1 OPERATIONS
5.77 CODE-MONTHLYAPPT BOOK 00040444 217218 IN0152775 1013.6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES CODE ENFORCEMENT
29.94 CLERK-SPECIAL ORDER LABE�S 00040444 217219 IN0152775 1015.6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
23.85 FIN-RULLED LEGAL PADS 00040444 217220 IN0152775 1035.6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES FINANCE
42.55 DEV-CALENDARS, APPT BOOK 00040444 217221 IN0152775 1100.6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES DEV MANAGEMENT
59.00 LIQ2-LINERS, SPRAY CLEANER 00040444 217222 IN0152777 5065.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR #2 OPERATIQNS
CITYOFAPP�_ cLLEY 11/2 9:16:24
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register Page - 15
11/16/2012 —11123/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
46.65 PVWMISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 00040444 217223 IN0153818 1500.6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES PW MANAGEMENT
273.51 CMF-MISC CLEANING SUPPLIES 00040444 217224 IN0153818 1540.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES CMF BUILDINCaS & GROUNDS MNTC
2,007.27
249935 11120I2012 743737 INSTALLED BUILDING SOLUTIONS
4,937.50 REIMB NRMP 13628 GOTHAM CT 217057 20121023 4900.2420 NRMP FIN GUAR-DEVELOPER DEP PHYSICAL IMPROV ESCROW BAL SHT
4,937.50
249936 11/20/2012 118232 JOHN DEERE FINANCIAL
102.51 PK-PARTS FOR MOWER 00035352 217058 P33459 1765.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
Supplier 100608 FRONTIER AG & TURF
161.89 PK-PARTS FOR MOWER 00035352 217059 P33624 1765.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
Suppiier 100608 FRONTIER AG & TURF
264.40
249937 11/20I2012 143738 JOHNSON, SCOTTA
165.00 EXPLORING SEXUAL OFFENDER-MCKN 217060 20121121 1225.6275 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL POLICE TRAINING
165.00
249938 71/2012012 102931 JRK SEED & TURF SUPPLY INC
374.06 PK-SOIL TEST/RECOMMEND, QP/JCB0049835 217127 6188 1715.6235 CONSULTANT 3ERVICES PARKATHLETIC FIEID MAINTENANC
374.06
249939 71120I2012 100118 KEEPRS INC
117.32 POL-QUICK DISCONNECT SYS/STRIBD067472 217128 201112 1200.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE MANAGEMENT
117.32
249940 11/20/2012 720569 KE3 EQUIPMENT d� SALES INC
307.00 CH-RPR WATER SOFTENER 00068234 217061 26916 1060.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT MUNICIPAL BIDG & GROUNDS MNTC
307.00
249947 1U20/2012 142046 KILLMER ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC.
392.80 TRAFFIC CNTRL SIGNAL SYS MAINT 217062 201113503 2027.6810 2011106R CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS ROAD ESCROW
9,298.22 TRAFFIC CNTRL SIGNAL SYS MAINT 217062 201113503 4502.6810 2011141G CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
9,691.02
249942 71120/2072 137345 KIRVIDA FIRE INC
373.00 FIRE-RPR TO PUMPER #4989 217129 3044 1350.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT FIRE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
475.00 FIRE-RPR TO PUMPER #4987 217130 3043 1350.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT FIRE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
848.00
249943 71/20I2012 120997 KRAEMER MINING & MATERIALS INC
I
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/21/20129:16:24
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register Page - 16
11/16/2012 -11/23/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit I
193.95 UTIL-LIMEROCK/RIPRAP FARQ STM00035236 217131 227588 5330.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES WTR MAIN/HYDRANT/CURB STOP MNT I
193.95 I
I
249944 71120/2012 137720 KULLY SUPPLY
40.24 AVCC-PUSH BAR 00069706 217063 SI236115 1900.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES AV COMMUNITY CENTER
40.24 I
249945 11/20/2012 101578 L3 COMMUNICATIONS MOBILE-VISIO
129.22 POL-TRANSMITTER BATTERY 217132 1915021N 1200.6211 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT POLICE MANAGEMENT
129.22
249946 1112012012 143160 LATOUR CONSTRUCTION INC
11,519.70 147TH ST EXT FLAGSTAFF TO JCRR 217064 201110705 2027.6810 2011107G CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS ROAD ESCROW
14,316.88 147TH ST EXT FLAGSTAFF TO JCRR 217064 201110705 2027.6810 2011107G CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS ROAD ESCROW
51,170.71 147TH ST EXT FLAGSTAFF TO JCRR 217064 201110705 2027.6810 2011107G CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS ROAD ESCROW
594,604.77 147TH ST EXT FLAGSTAFF TO JCRR 217064 201110705 2027.6810 2011107G CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS ROAD ESCROW
671,612.06
249947 11/20l2072 100281 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES
40.00 LMC REGIONAL MTG-GOODWIN 217065 170946 1005.6275 SCHOOLSlCONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL MAYOR/CITY COUNCIL
40.00 I
249948 17@0/2012 101616 LMC INSURANCE TRUST
114.59 WC DEDUCTIBLE CORDES 217066 20121101 7205.6315 WORKERS COMP-DEDUCTIBLE RISK MANAGEMENTS/INSURANCE
116.88 WC DEDUCTIBLE ZUKANOFF 217066 20121101 7205.6315 WORKERS COMP-DEDUCTIBLE RISK MANAGEMENTS/INSURANCE
185.37 WC DEDUCTIBLE TRITES 217066 20121101 7205.6315 WORKERS COMP-DEDUCTIBLE RISK MANAGEMENTS/INSURANCE
624.86 WC DEDUCTIBLE ABBOTT 217066 20121101 7205.6315 WORKERS COMP-DEDUCTIBLE RISK MANAGEMENTS/INSURANCE
1,04170 I
249949 11/20/2012 100293 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT
204.02 STR-PRESSURE SLOT CURTAIN 00035435 217133 2125653 1630.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS STREET EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
204.02
249950 11I2012012 100942 MADDEN GALANTER HANSEN, LLP
49.20 HR-SERVICES RENDERED THRU 9/�069920 217081 20121001 1020.6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES �
49.20
249951 71/20/2012 700299 MASTER ELECTRIC CO �
28L24 PK-LOCATES AT QUARRY POINT 00035347 217134 SD2411 1720.6269 REPAIRS-OTHER PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE i
254.92 LOCATES AT JCRPE AND RPR 00035347 217135 SD2412 1720.6269 - REPAIRS-OTHER PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE I
194.90 UTIL-HARDWIRED UPS-SCADA PAN�t]035237 217136 SD2410 5330.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT WfR MAIN/HYDRANT/CURB STOP MNT
1,370.84 CMF-REWIRED LUNCH ROOM 00035193 217137 SD2409 "', 1540:6266 REPAIRS-BUILDING CMF BUILDINGS 8 � INDS MNTC i
�
, i
CITYOFAPF. :LLEY 11/i �9:1624
R55CKREG WG20000
Councii Check Register Page - 17
11l16/2012 -11/23/2012 n �
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
2,101.90
249952 11/20/2012 100309 MENARDS
21.34 CH-ICE MACHINE FILTER 00069455 216960 7392 1060.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES MUNICIPAL BLDG & GROUNDS MNTC
13.83 CH-LIGHT, BULB 00069454 216961 7110 1060.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES MUNICIPAL BLDG & GROUNDS MNTC
3.98 PK-CEDAR, RDWD BLDG 00035348 216962 7455 1730.6229 GENERA� SUPPLIES PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE
101.10 PK-PAINT SUPPLIES, RDWD BLDG 00035348 216963 7375 1730.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE
9.81 PK-CEDAR, RDWD BLDG 00035348 216964 7388 1730.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE
367.79 WQ-CHAINLINK FENCE SUPPLIES 00067395 216965 7395 5505.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES STORM DRAIN UTILITY
55.22 GOLF-SUPPLIES 00035389 216966 6912 5150.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF COURSE MAINTENANCE
10.65 GOLF-PRY BAR, PUMP 00035389 216967 6912 5150.6211 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT GOLF COURSE MAINTENANCE
10.32 POL-SUPPLIES FOR DUAL MONITOFa0070452 216968 6771 1210.6211 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT POLICE FIELD OPERATIONS/PATROL
37.37 UTiI-DIGITAL METER 00035238 216969 7659 5310.6211 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT WATER METER RPR/REPLACE/READNG
40.19 PK-LAWN/LEAF BAGS 00035348 216970 7778 1720.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE
69.00 PK-LAWN/LEAF BAGS, TARPS 00035348 216971 7575 1720.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE
3.71 PK-SILICON 00035348 216972 7474 1720.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE
4.00 PK-JIGSAW BITS 00035348 216973 7473 1720.6211 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT PARK GROUN�S MAINTENANCE
44.87 PK-ADAPTER, CORRIGATED TUBE 00035348 216974 7473 1720.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE '�
8.54 CMF-POLYCRYLIC 1/2 PINT GLOSS 00035439 216975 7031 1540.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES CMF BUILDINGS & GROUNDS MNTC
57.32 PK-ANTIFREEZE, FOR SHELTERS 00035348 216976 6806 1730.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE
97.80 PK-SUPPLIES FOR BENCH RPRS 00035348 216977 6806 1720.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE
11.37 PK-SDS BIT 00035349 216978 6807 1730.6211 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE
9.99 PK-SCREWS, GLUE 00035349 216979 6807 1730.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE
36.49 AVCC-MISC SUPPLIES 00069702 216980 7008 1900.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES AV COMMUNITY CENTER
8.84 PK-FLOOD LIGHT, BUSHING 00035348 216981 6910 1730.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE
185.91 PK-SUPPLIES FOR DOOR INSTALL, 00035348 216982 6732 1730.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE
10.17 CMF-DRILL BITS 00035439 216983 6823 1540.6211 . SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT CMF BUILDINGS & GROUNDS MNTC
8.82 CMF-COMPOSIT SHIM OD035439 216984 6823 1540.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES CMF BUILDINGS & GROUNDS MNTC
60.79 PK-CEDAR, RDWD BLDG 0�035348 216985 7628 1730.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE
30.94 CMF-GASKET, PUTTY, MOUNT 00035439 216986 7842 1540.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS CMF BUILDINGS & GROUNDS MNTC
35.26 PK-TENSION BANDS 00035348 216987 7941 1725.6229 GENERAI SUPPLIES PARK ICE RINK MAINTENANCE
9,88 PK-DRILLBIT 00035348 216988 7941 1725.6211 SMALL TOOIS & EQUIPMENT PARK ICE RINK MAINTENANCE
26.70 PK-14' RATCHETX 1500 LBS 0a035348 216989 9114 1720.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE
32.06 WQ-MISC HARDWARE FOR FENCE 00067398 216990 9147 5505:6229 GENERAL SUPPUES STORM DRAIN UTILITY
21.36 SWIM-MICE/RAT BAIT 00035348 216991 8943 1940.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES AQUATIC SWIM CENTER
54.35 AVCC-MISC SUPPLIE5 00069705 216992 8111 1900.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES AV COMMUNITY CENTER
26.42 CMF-PAINT BRUSH, SEALER 00035439 216993 6937 1540.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES CMF BUILDINGS & GROUNDS MNTC
40.19 PK-LAWN BAGS 00035348 216994 8115 1720.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE
21.31 PK-PMGREEN 8 DAY, HOCKEY RINK80035348 216995 7958 1725.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ICE RINK MAINTENANCE
23.47 PK-BRUSH, PAINT LINER, REDWD 800035348 216996 7920 1730.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE
42.58 PK-POLE, BRUSHES, VNNG NUTS 00035348 216997 7929 1725.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ICE RINK MAINTENANCE
I
j
i
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/21/20129:16:24 ,
R55CKREG LOG20000 Pa e- 18 �
Council Check Register 9 '
I
11/16/2012 -11/23/2012 ��
Check # Date Amount Suppiier / Explanation PO # Doc No inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit I
16.97 PK-PMGREEN 8 DAY, HOCKEY RINK80035348 216998 7868 1725.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ICE RINK MAINTENANCE
9.16 PK-CAULK, REDWD BLDG 00035348 216999 9037 1730.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE
173.33 PK-TREATED WOOD, HOCKEY RINK�0035348 217000 9037 1725.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ICE RINK MAINTENANCE
260.60 GOLF-TREATED WOOD, CEDAR SIDIT0035389 217001 9051 5150.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF COURSE MAINTENANCE
25.65 GOLF-CONCRETE MIX 00035389 217002 8948 5150.6229 GENERAL SUPPIIES GOLF COURSE MAINTENANCE
8.00 STR-MISC SUPPLIES 00035439 217003 9126 1610.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET/BOULEVARD REPAIR & MNTC
15.97 STR-MISC SUPPLIES 00035439 217004 8653 1610.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET/BOULEVARD REPAIR & MNTC
9.48 PK-HEX HEAD BOLT 00035348 217005 8133 1725.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ICE RINK MAINTENANCE
10.66 PK-TOILET TANK RPR KIT 00035348 217006 8099 1730.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE
6.28 PK-TWIST LOCK PHOTO CONTROL 00035348 217007 8021 1730.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE
24.55 AVCC-RACHET 00035348 217008 8001 1900.6211 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT AV COMMUNITY CENTER
207.77 AVCGSYSTEM SAVER SALT PELLE1C�035348 217009 8001 1900.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES AV COMMUNITY CENTER ,
7J0 CMF-OUTLET PLATE, BOOT TRAY 00035439 217010 7935 1540.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES CMF BUILDINGS & GROUNDS MNTC '
58.55 CH-PAINT TRAY LINERS, ROLLER C 00068233 217011 8009 1060.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES MUNICIPAL BLDG & GROUNDS MNTC �
49.83 PK-ANTIFREEZE 00035348 217012 8204 1730.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE I
25.63 REC-HEATER 00070165 217013 8059 1840.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REC TEEN PROGRAMS I
37.39 HCSC-HEATER 00070165 217014 8059 1920.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES HAYES COMMUNITY & SENIOR CTR �
69.46 CEMETERY-POLY BLACK D0035439 217015 7652 5605.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES CEMETERY
74.36 UTIL-SPACE HEATER 00035238 217016 8188 5320.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/RPR
17.60 PK-PVC PIPE, BUSHING 00035348 217017 8492 1780.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS PARK HIGH SCHOOL #4 FIELDS
275.04 GOLF-SUPPLIES, FENCE AROUND F�'0035389 217018 8514 5190.6229 2011137G GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF CLUBHOUSE CONSTRUCTION
110.30 WQ-SUPPLIES, CHAIN LINK FENCE 00035238 217019 7378 5505.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES STORM DRAIN UTILITY
4928- WQ-RETURN SUPPLIES FOR FENC�0035238 217020 7384 5505.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES STORM DRAIN UTILITY
132.56 UTIL-MISC TOOLS, SPOTLIGHT 00035238 217021 7083 5380.6211 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT SEWER LIFT STN REPAIR & MNTC
284.06 GOLF-SUPPLIES, FENCE AROUND RS0035389 217022 8430 5190.6229 2011137G GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF CLUBHOUSE CONSTRUCTION
134.89 GOLF-MOUSE BAIT, TUBING 00035389 217023 8006 5150.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF COURSE MAINTENANCE
69.62- PK-RETURN VINYL SH WINDOW 00035348 217024 6722 1730.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE
18.43 PK-SQUEEGEES 00035348 217025 8636 1730.6211 SMALL TOOIS & EQUIPMENT PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE �
5.08 PK-TERMINAL CAP 00035348 217026 8511 1725.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ICE RINK MAINTENANCE
22.66 STR-CONCRETE, SIDWALK RPRS 00035439 217027 6811 1610.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREETlBOULEVARD REPAIR & MNTC
10.68 STR-CONCRETE, SIDWALK RPRS 00035439 217028 6750 1610.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET/BOULEVARD REPAIR & MNTC
10.64 STR-PAINT FOR PLOW MARKERS 00035439 217029 7642 1665.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET SNOW & ICE MATERIALS
10.64 STR-HOOKS FOR BRINE TANK 00035439 217030 8208 1665.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS STREET SNOW & ICE MATERIALS
14.92 STR-HOOK, CLEVIS FOR BRINE TAND0035439 217031 8193 1665.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS STREET SNOW & ICE MATERIALS I
19.17 PK-PAINT, PAINT TRAY, RINKS 00035348 217032 8402 1725.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ICE RINK MAINTENANCE i
40.19 PK-LAWN BAGS 00035348 217033 8267 1720.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE I
88.20 CMF-BROOKSVILLE BAR, CAULK, MD0035439 217034 7646 1540.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES CMF BUILDINGS & GROUNDS MNTC �
20.49 CH-SURGE, 2 PACK 00069457 217035 8027 1060.6229 GENERAI SUPPLIES MUNICIPAL BLDG & GROUNOS MNTC ,
57.66 WQ-MISC SUPPLIES FOR FARQUARf10035238 217036 9120 5505.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES STORM DRAIN UTIUTY i
3,899.39
' ' !i
CITYOFAPP. �LEY 11/2 ;9:16:24
R55CKREG Luv20000
Council Check Register Page - 19
11/16/2012 —11/23/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
249953 11l20/2012 114018 MGWA
35.00 UTII-MEMB RNWL BLOMMEL-JOHN�OQ86089 217139 20121115 5305.6280 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS WATER MGMT/REPORT/DATA ENTRY
35.00
249954 71/20@072 141669 MIDWEST ELECTRICAL TECHNOLOGIE
2,707.67 INSP-ELECTRICAL INSPECT FEES 217138 20121121 1445.6243 ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES INSPECTIONS ELECTRICAL
2,707.67
249955 77/20I2012 700546 MN GOLF ASSOCIATION INC
22.00 GOLF-HANDICAP FEES, WOMENS 00070276 217067 7067612 5110.6426 HANDICAP FEE GOLF CLUBHOUSE BUILDING
132.00 GOLF-HANDICAP FEES, MENS 00070276 217067 7067612 5110.6426 HANDICAP FEE GOLF CLUBHOUSE BUILDING
154.00
249956 17/2012012 100323 MN PIPE & EQUIPMENT
18.48 UTIL-GASKET 00035239 217068 291702 5330.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES WTR MAIN/HYDRANT/CUR6 STOP MNT
4,156.11 UTIL-HYDRANT, VALVES 00035239 217068 291702 5330.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS WTR MAIN/HYDRANT/CURB STOP MNT
4,174.59
249957 71/20/2012 700575 MN STATE FIRE CHIEFS ASSOCIATI ',
496.00 FIRE-2012 FIRE CHIEF MAG RNWL 217069 9 1300.6280 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FIRE MANAGEMENT I
496.00 �I
249958 11/20/2012 122063 MVMA INC I
1,664.80 REC-SUMMER/FALL 2012 CLASSES 217140 M150 1845.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REC SELF SUPPORT PROG GENERAL
1,664.80 �I
�I
249959 71/20/2072 120496 NATURE CALLS INC ,
187.90 PK-CHEMICAI TOILETS-NOV 00050750 217070 16292 1770.6310 RENTAI EXPENSE PARK GENERAL MAINTENANCE
196.29 GOLF-CHEMICAL TOIIETS-NOV 00050750 217070 16292 5150.6310 RENTAL EXPENSE GOLF COURSE MAINTENANCE I
384.19 'i
249960 11/20/2012 121340 NGF CONSULTING INC '
199.00 GOLF-ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP ZWCIm0070274 217141 1032492 5105.6280 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF MANAGEMENT
199.00
249961 77/20I2012 100359 NIKE USA INC
4.45 GOLF-FREIGHT 00068799 217071 945586201 5115.6424 GOLF FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE GOLF PRO SHOP
116.60 GOLF-SHOES 00068799 217071 945586201 5115.6416 GOLF-SHOES GOLF PRO SHOP
121.05
249962 11/2012072 100262 PING
1.68- GOLF-DISCOUNT 00066482 217072 11530756 5115.6423 GOLF-CASH DISCOUNT GOLF PRO SHOP
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/21/20129:16:24
Council Check Register Page - 20
11/16/2012 —11/23l2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No inv No Account No Subledger Account Descrip6on Business Unit
8.79 GOLF-FREIGHT 00066482 217072 11530756 5115.6424 GOLF FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE GOLF PRO SHOP
84.00 GOLF-IRONS, BOWEN 00066482 217072 11530756 5115.6414 GOLF-CLUBS GOLF PRO SHOP
91.11
249963 11120I2012 700578 PROACT INC
850.65 PK-JANITORIAL ENCLAVE 10/1-11/ 217142 43969 1700.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES PARK & RECREATION MANAGEMENT
850.65
249964 11/20I2012 100432 SEH ENGINEERS
25,500.00 WATER TRMNT PLANT EXPANSION 217082 262028 5325.6235 2012108W CONSULTANT SERVICES WATER TREATMENT FCLTY MNTC/RPR
25,500.00
249965 77/2012012 100439 SKB ENVIRONMENTAL
5,449.45 WQ-EVR-P12 POND SEDIMENT DISF00047766 217143 59815 5505.6269 2012107D REPAIRS-OTHER STORM DRAIN UTILITY
4,551.14 WQ-EVR-P12 POND SEDIMENT DISFD0047766 217144 59963 5505.6269 2012107D REPAIRS-OTHER STORM DRAIN UTILITY
10,000.59
249966 11/20/2012 140027 ST PAUL, CITY OF
344.31 STR-BLACKTOP FOR POTHOLES 217145 125120 1610.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET/BOULEVARD REPAIR & MNTC
344.31
249967 11/2012012 119786 STDEA READERS INC
2,304.43 UTIL-METER READER-NOV 217107 20121115 5303.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES UTILITY BtLLING
2,304.43
249968 11I20/2072 103468 SYSTEMATIC RAIN INC.
426.99 FLAGSTAFF AVE EXT 217108 11332 4703.6249 2011105G OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES FLAGSTAFF EXTENSION
426.99
249969 11/20/2072 100464 TAYLOR MADE GOLF
6.60 GOLF-SHIPPING REPL SHOES 00070277 217239 18636804 5115.6424 GOLF FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE GOLF PRO SHOP
6.60
249970 11l20/2072 100838 TKDA I
1,508.17 UTIL-AV WELL#11 ELECTRIC UPGRD 217074 2012003012 5320.6235 2012155W CONSULTANT SERVICES WATER WELUBOOSTER STN MNT/RPR i
1, 508.17 I
I
249971 11120/2072 100487 TRI-STATE BOBCAT INC I
97.17 STR-CABLE, SIDE MIRROR KIT 00062937 217146 P16203 1630.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS STREET EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
97.17
249972 1112� �� 701355 TURFWERKS, INC � � , I
I
. � I
I
CITYOFAPPt :�LEY 11/2 9:16:24
R55CKREG LUG20000
Council Check Register Page - 21
11/16/2012 -11/23/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
9.30 STR-ELBOW, NIPPLE &ADAPTER 00069080 216813 EI75280 1630.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS STREET EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
9.30
249973 71/20/2012 142587 U S HEALTH WORKS MEDICAL GRP M
558.00 POL-PHYSICALS MEUWISSEN/NEUMAN 217148 13291MN 1210.6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES POLICE FIELD OPERATIONS/PATROI
558.00
249974 11/20I2072 100489 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
107.00 NAVY POIICE DUTY SHIRTS 00070502 217147 140834 1200.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE POLICE MANAGEMENT
107.00
249975 11/20I2072 123538 VARITECH INDUSTRIES INC
179.15 STR-ELECTRIC VALVE, HEX PLUG 00035441 217149 124862 1630.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS STREET EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
179.15
249976 71/2012012 100631 VERIZON WIRELESS
1,511.69 POL-CELL PHONE OCT 217075 2822577976 1200.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS POLICE MANAGEMENT
30.19 IA1 MOBILE PHONE NOV 217109 2824423420 5205.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS ARENA 1 MANAGEMENT
40.01 CODE WIRELESS DAT�4 217109 2824423420 1013.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS CODE ENFORCEMENT
40.01 IT WIRELESS DATA 217109 2824423420 1030.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
40.01 NR WIRELESS DATA 217109 2824423420 1520.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS NATURAL RESOURCES
40.01 PK WIRELESS DATA 217109 2824423420 1710.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS PARK MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT
40.01 GOLF WIRELESS DATA 217109 2824423420 5105.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS GOLF MANAGEMENT
40.01 SWIM WIRELESS DATA 217109 2824423420 1940.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS AQUATIC SWIM CENTER
52.77 CABLE MOBILE PHONE NOV 217109 2824423420 2012.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS CABLE N JOINT POWERS
52.77 CODE MOBILE PHONE NOV 217109 2824423420 1013.6237 TELEPHONElPAGERS CODE ENFORCEMENT
52.77 INSP MOBILE PHONE NOV 217109 2824423420 1400.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS INSPECTIONS MANAGEMENT
52.77 PW MOBILE PHONE NOV 217109 2824423420 1500.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS PW MANAGEMENT
80.02 UTII WIRELESS DATA 217109 2824423420 5305.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS WATER MGMT/REPORT/DATA ENTRY
82.96 SHOP MOBILE PHONE NOV 217109 2824423420 1530.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS CMF SHOP EQUIP MNTC & REPAIR
90.57 STR MOBILE PHONE NOV 217109 2824423420 1600.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS STREET MANAGEMENT
90.63 NR MOBILE PHONE NOV 217109 2824423420 1520.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS NATURAL RESOURCES
105.54 ADM MOBILE PHONE NOV 217109 2824423420 1010.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS ADMINISTRATION
117.39 REC MOBIIE PHONE NOV 217109 2824423420 1700.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS PARK & RECREATION MANAGEMENT
120.03 INSP WIRELESS DATA 217109 2824423420 1400.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS INSPECTIONS MANAGEMENT
122.61 PK MOBILE PHONE NOV 217109 2824423420 1710.6237 TEIEPHONE/PAGERS PARK MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT
143.45 ENG MOBILE PHONE NOV 217109 2824423420 1510.6237 TELEPHONEIPAGERS PW ENGINEERING & TECHNICAL I
154.46 UTIL MOBIIE PHONE NOV 217109 2824423420 5305.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS WATER MGMT/REPORT/DATA ENTRY
158.31 IT MOBIL PHONE NOV 217109 2824423420 1030.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
360.11 FIRE WIRELESS DATA 217109 2824423420 1300.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS FIRE MANAGEMENT
960.44 POL WIRELESS DATA 217109 2824423420 1205.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS POLICE RECORDS UNIT
4,579.54
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OFAPPLE VALLEY 11/21/20129:1624
Council Check Register Page - 22
11/16/2012 —11/23/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Descrip6on Business Unit
249977 17120/2012 131557 WESTERN EQUIPMENT FINANCE
1,063.41 GOLF MOWER LEASE TO PURCHASE 217153 914052 5100.2715 CAPITAL LEASE-NONCURRENT GOLF FUND BALANCE SHEET
1,063.41
249978 11/20I2012 100296 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MIN - BEER INC
113.60 GOLF-KTN BEER 00011037 217076 978922 5120.6419 GOLF-BEER GOLF KITCHEN
113.60
20121125 71I16/2012 100000 MN DEPT OF REVENUE
202.00 SAIES/USE TAX-ARENA 217156 577949952 5200.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT ARENA FUND BALANCE SHEET
1,762.00 SALES/USE TAX-GENERAL FUND 217156 577949952 1000.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
4,360.00 SALES/USE TAX-GOLF 217156 577949952 5100.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT GOLF FUND BALANCE SHEET
4,498.00 SALES/USE TAX-WATER & SWR 217156 577949952 5300.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT WATER & SEWER FUND BAL SHEET
14,171.00 SALES/USE TAX-IIQUOR #2 217156 577949952 5000.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
22,518.00 SALES/USE TAX-LIQUOR #3 217156 577949952 5000.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
31,457.00 SALES/USE TAX-LIQUOR #1 217156 577949952 5000.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
78, 968.00
20121126 11179/2012 100873 HEALTHPARTNERS
2,646.55 DENTAL CLAIMS 11/8-11/14/12 217157 20121114 7105.6146 DENTAL INSURANCE INSURANCE TRUST DENTAL
2,646.55
20121127 11/21/2012 700338 MN UNEMPLOYMENT COMP FUND
74.16 UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS PAID 217158 121104P 5205.6143 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION ARENA 1 MANAGEMENT
488.91 UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS PAID 217158 121104P 1950.6143 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION INSURANCE
1,279.85 UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS PAID 217158 121104P 5005.6143 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION LIQUOR GENERAL OPERATIONS
1,842.92
20121128 77/21/2012 100455 AFFINITY PLUS FEDERAL CREDIT U
2,277.10 CREDIT UNION DEDUCT 217094 1119121553193 9000.2120 ACCRUED BENEFIT LIABILITY PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
2,277.10
20121129 71/21/2012 107238 MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PAYMEN
298.78 CHILD SUPPORT 217096 1119121553195 9000.2120 ACCRUED BENEFIT LIABILITY PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
171.97 CHILD SUPPORT 277097 1119121553196 9000.2120 ACCRUED BENEFIT LIABILITY PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
24.45 CHILD SUPPORT 217098 1119121553197 9000.2120 ACCRUED BENEFIT LIABILITY PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET I
228.42 CHILD SUPPORT 217099 1119121553198 9000.2120 ACCRUED BENEFIT LIABILITY PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
415.32 CHILD SUPPORT 217100 1119121553199 9000.2120 ACCRUED BENEFIT LIABILITY PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
1,138.94
20121130 1112�" "' 100392 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENTAS ^ �
, • I
R55CKREG Ltx;20000 CITYOFAPP: .�LEY 11/2 9:16:24
Councii Check Register Page - 23
11/16/2012 — 11/23l2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledge Account Description Business Unit
37,021.76 EMPLOYEE SHARE PERA 217093 1119121553192 9000.2114 ACCRUED PERA PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
48,126.12 CITY SHARE PERA 217093 1119121553192 9000.2114 ACCRUED PERA PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
85,147.88
20127137 11/21/2072 129553 US BANK
2,957.82 HSA FUNDING-EMPLOYEE 217090 11191215531913 9000.2125 ACCRUED HSA/HRA BENEFIT PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SNEET
2,957.82
20121732 11121/2072 129576 US BANK
231.98 SERGEANT PERHA FUNDING-GROSS W 217091 11191215531914 9000.2120 ACCRUED BENEFIT LIABILITY PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
1,074.28 POLICE PEHRA FUNDING-GROSS WAG 217091 11191215531914 9000.2120 ACCRUED BENEFIT LIABILITY PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
1,393.34 POLICE PEHRA FUNDING-ANNUAL LE 217091 11191215531914 9000.2120 ACCRUED BENEFIT LIABIIITY PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
917.31 POLICE PEHRA FUNDING-COMP 217091 11191215531914 9000.2120 ACCRUED BENEFIT LIABILITY PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
3,616.91
20121133 11/21/2012 700240 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS -
28,892.64 PLAN #301171 FULL-TIME ICMA 217086 1119121553191 9000.2120 ACCRUED BENEFIT LIABILITY PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
28,892.64
20121134 11/21/2072 126459 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS - i
275.00 PLAN #705481 ROTH IRA 217089 11191215531912 9000.2120 ACCRUED BENEFIT LIABILITY PAYROLL CLEARING BAl SHEET
275.00 I
20121735 11/22I2012 100657 MN DEPT OF REVENUE
25,010.25 PAYROLL STATE TAX 217236 121102G 9000.2112 ACCRUED STATE W/H PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET I
25,010.25
20121136 11123@012 102664 ANCHOR BANK �
7,996.93 EMPLOYEE MEDICARE 217238 1211028 9000.2111 ACCRUED FEDERAUFICA PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
. 7,996.93 CITY SHARE MEDICARE 217238 1211026 90002111 ACCRUED FEDERAUFICA PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET 'I
16,097.04 EMPLOYEE FICA 217238 121102B 90002111 ACCRUED FEDERAUFICA PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET i
23,762.21 CITY SHARE FICA 217238 1211028 9000.2111 ACCRUED FEDERAUFICA PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET �
61,162.71 FEDERAL TAXES PR 217238 1211026 9000.2111 ACCRUED FEDERAUFICA PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
117,015.82 ',
20127137 77/19/2072 142702 BLUE CROSS BWE SHIELD OF MINN ,
391.50 HSAACCORD 2500/5000 217159 V3 9000.2115 ACCRUED MEDICAL INSURANCE PAYROLI CLEARING BAL SHEET �
4,715.00 HSAACCORD 4000/8000 217160 W1 9000.2115 ACCRUED MEDICAL INSURANCE PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
3,988.00 HSAAWARE 2500/5000 (RETIREE) 217161 K3 9000.2115 ACCRUED MEDICAL INSURANCE PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
44,806.50 HSAAWARE 2500/5000 217162 K1 9000.2115 ACCRUED MEDICAL INSURANCE PAYROLI CLEARING BAL SHEET
27,038.50 HSAACCORD 2500/5000 217163 V1 9000.2115 ACCRUED MEDICAL INSURANCE PAYROLI CLEARING BAL SHEET
792.00 HRAACCORD 4000/8000 (RETIREE) 217164 U3 9000.2115 ACCRUED MEDICAL INSURANCE PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
CITY OFAPPLE VALLEY 11/21/20129:1624 I
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register Page - 24
11/16/2012 — 11/23/2012 I
Check # Date Amount Supplier ! Expianation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
855.00 HRAACCORD 2500/5000 (RETIREE) 217165 S3 9000.2115 ACCRUED MEDICAL INSURANCE PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
377.00 HRAACCORD 4000/8000 217166 U1 9000.2115 ACCRUED MEDICAL INSURANCE PAYROLI CLEARING BAL SHEET
1,019.50 HRAAWARE 4000/8000 217167 J1 9000.2115 ACCRUED MEDICAL INSURANCE PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
13,122.50 HRAAWARE 2500I5000 217168 F1 9000.2115 ACCRUED MEDICAL INSURANCE PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
8,593.00 HRAACCORD 2500/5000 217169 S1 9000.2115 ACCRUED MEDICAL INSURANCE PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET i
3,144.50 30 COPAYAWARE (RETIREE) 217170 A3 9000.2115 ACCRUED MEDICAL INSURANCE PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
1,295.00 30 COPAYAWARE (RETIREE) 217171 A5 90002115 ACCRUED MEDICAL INSURANCE PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
20,468.00 30 COPAY AWARE 217172 A1 9000.2115 ACCRUED MEDICAL INSURANCE PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET �
1,233.00 30 COPAYAWARE (RETIREE) 217173 A2 9000.2115 ACCRUED MEDICAL INSURANCE PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
4,565.00 30 COPAY ACCORD 217174 M1 9000.2115 ACCRUED MEDICAL INSURANCE PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
1,467.50 0/90% COINSURANCE ACCORD 217175 N1 90002115 ACCRUED MEDICAL INSURANCE PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
1,233.00 0/90% COINSURANCE AWARE 217176 B1 9000.2115 ACCRUED MEDICAL INSURANCE PAYROIL CLEARING BAL SHEET I
139,104.50 I
I
2,026,639.14 Grand Total � Payment Instrument Totals
`` �ii�`` CheckTotal 1,412,538.29
� o'
Transfer Total 488,894.33
Pay ModeX Total 125,206.52
��� Total Payments 2�026,639.14 I
l/
/ � �,1/
1 �
I
i
. , .
. „
�I
CITY OF APF. �LLEY 11/:: :9:18:05
R55CKSUM LGc,t0000
Council Check Summary Page - 1
11/16/2012 - 11/23/2012
Company Amount I
01000 GENERAL FUND 146,332.13
02010 CABLE N RESERVEFUND 52•��
02015 PARK DEDICATION FUND 380.52 ,
02025 ROAD ESCROW FUND 727,510.55 '
,
02060 POLICE CRIME FUND 2,333.29 i
02090 DAKOTATECHNICAL BLDG ESCROW 68•29 I
04030 DAKOTACTY CONSTRUCT PROJ FUND 299•98
04300 2003 CONSTRUCTION FUND 135.90
04500 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 77,153.16
04700 TIF DIST#13-CAPITAL PROJECTS 15,088.87
04710 TIF DIST#7-CAPITAL PROJECTS 40,406.00 '
04715 20121MPROVEMENTS 4,142J0
04900 PHYSICAL IMPROVEMENTS ESCROW F 5,995.75
05000 LIQUOR FUND 299,869.99
05100 GOLF FUND 148,802.63
05200 ARENA FUND 9,543.53
05300 WATER & SEWER FUND 89,986.63
05500 STORM DRAINAGE UTILITY FUND 10,545.25
05550 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 3,130.10
05600 CEMETERY FUND LEVEL PROGRAM 138.46
05700 CEMETERY LANDSCAPE FUND 209.55
05800 STREET LIGHT UTI� FUND 32,909.24
07100 INSURANCE TRUST DENTAL FUND 2,646.55
07200 RISK MANAGEMENT/INSURANCE FUND 1,041J0
09000 PAYROL�CLEARING FUND 407,916.60
Report Totals 2,026,639.14
i
�i
I
i
!I
R55CKREG Luv20000 CITY OF APP., ,LLEY 11/2 15:47:04
Council Check Register Page - 1
10/16/2012 -11/30(2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledge Account Description Business Unit
1500 11/30/2012 100101 ACE HARDWARE
6.41 CMF-SUPPLIES 00035176 217561 50708 1540.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES CMF BUILDINGS & GROUNDS MNTC
13.68 CMF-SUPPLIES 00035176 217562 50704 1540.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES CMF BUILDINGS & GROUNDS MNTC
1.88- CMF-DISCOUNT 217563 1540.6333 GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS CMF BUILDINGS & GROUNDS MNTC
10.64 CH-FUSE REPLCMT 00035176 217564 50503 1060.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES MUNICIPAL BLDG & GROUNDS MNTC
1.00- CH-DISCOUNT 00035176 217565 50503 1060.6333 GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS MUNICtPAL BLDG 8 GROUNOS MNTC
18.64 HCSC-SIGNS, KEYS 00070166 217566 50589 1920.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES HAYES COMMUNITY & SENIOR CTR
5.88 HCSC-NUTS/BOLTS 00070168 217567 50709 1920.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES HAYES COMMUNITY & SENIOR CTR
2.29- HCSC-DISCOUNT 217568 1920.6333 GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS HAYES COMMUNITY & SENIOR CTR
13.87 IA1-CAULK 00069291 217569 50703 5210.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA 1 BUILDING MAINTENANCE
14.94 IA1-SCREWDRIVER, NUTSETTER 00069291 217570 50703 5210.6211 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT ARENA 1 BUILDING MAINTENANCE
93.43 IA1-CABLE TIES, DUCT TAPE 00069286 217571 50614 5210.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA 1 BUILDING MAINTENANCE
24.00 IA1-DUCT TAPE 00069285 217572 50604 5210.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA 1 BUILDING MAINTENANCE
44.84 IA1-BLADE DISPENSER, UTIL KNIF 00069284 217573 50578 5210.6211 SMALL TOOLS & EQU�PMENT ARENA 1 BUILDING MAINTENANCE
13.88 IA1-BATTERY PACK 00069284 217574 50578 5210.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS ARENA 1 BUILDING MAINTENANCE
24.19 IA1-GLOVES 00069284 217575 50578 5210.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA 1 BUILDING MAINTENANCE
29.33 IA1-CAULK 00069288 217576 50695 5210.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA 1 BUILDING MAINTENANCE
8.01 IA1-SCREWDRIVER BITS 00069288 217577 50695 5210.6211 SMALL TOOLS 8 EQUIPMENT ARENA 1 BUILDING MAINTENANCE
25.02- IA1-DISCOUNT 217578 5210.6333 GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS ARENA 1 BUILDING MAINTENANCE
13.87 POOL-PLUG DRAIN TEST, NUTS/80100035340 217579 50464 1930.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REDWOOD POOL
26.15 PK-WASHERS, PRIMER, BLACK PAIM0035340 217580 50391 1765.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
11.21 PK-THERMOCOUPLE 00035340 217581 50653 1730.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE
7.47 PK-AIR FILTER 00035340 217582 50649 1730.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE I
I
30.97 PK-SCREWDRIVER, DRILL BIT SET 00035340 217583 50649 1730.6211 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE I
38.44 PK-SCREWDRIVER, DRILL BIT SET 00035340 217554 50648 1765.6211 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
12.00- PK-DISCOUNT 217585 1710.6333 GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS PARK MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT
17.61 POL-MOP&GLO, TIRE WET 00067470 217586 50827 1210.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE FIELD OPERATIONS/PATROL
16.11 POL-REFLECTIVE TAPE, TIRE WET 00069398 217587 50573 1210.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE FIELD OPERATIONS/PATROL
7.52 POL-MISC SUPPLIES 00035283 217588 50487 1250.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE FACILITY
27.22 POL-ARMOR ALL, MULTI PURP CLEP00069396 217589 50444 1210.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE FIELD OPERATIONS/PATROL
12.77 POL-KEY, RUBBER HEAD 00069391 217590 50352 1210.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE FIELD OPERATIONS/PATROL
8.10 POL-REFLECTIVE TAPE 00067468 217591 50745 1210.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE FIELD OPERATIONS/PATROL
8.12- POL-DISCOUNT 217592 1200.6333 GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS POLICE MANAGEMENT
69.45 FIRE-PRIZES FOR LIFE FAIR 00035260 217593 50738 1300.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE MANAGEMENT
19.23 FIRE-TOOL BAG, 19 POCKET 00035260 217594 50609 1330.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE OPERATIONS
38.45 FIRE-TOOL BAG, 19 POCKET 00035260 217595 50836 1330.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE OPERATIONS
19.21 FIRE-CLEANER FOR 4993 00035260 217596 50548 1350.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
4.26 FIRE-FLOOR CLEANING SUPPLIES 00035260 217597 50432 1340.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE BLDG & GROUNDS MNTC
9.61 FIRE-STATION SUPPLIES 00035260 217598 50411 1340.6229 GENERAL SUPPUES FIRE BLDG & GROUNDS MNTC
25.60 FIRE-STATION SUPPLIES 00035260 217599 50376 1340.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE BLDG & GROUNDS MNTC
15.90- FIRE-DISCOUNT 217600 1300.6333 GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS FIRE MANAGEMENT
CITY OFAPPLE VALLEY 11/29/20125:47:04 '
RSSCKREG LOG20000 Pa e� 2 I
Council Check Register 9
10/16/2012 -11/30/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
5.75 UTIL-CLOROX WIPES 00035231 217601 50346 5375.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES SEWER MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR
25.04 WQ-CHAIN LINK FENCE SUPPLIES 00035231 217602 50416 5505.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES STORM DRAIN UTILITY
38.45 WQ-MISC TOOLS 00035231 217603 50479 5505.6211 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT STORM DRAIN UTILITY
11.19 UTI�-BULB INDICATOR 00035231 217604 50638 5380.6215 EQUtPMENT-PARTS SEWER LIFT STN REPAIR & MNTC
7.33 UTIL-MISC SUPPLIES FOR MESSG H10035231 217605 50687 5390.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES SWR EQUIPNEHICLE MISC MNTC/RP
12.37 UTIL-MISC WELL SUPPLIES 00035231 217606 50499 5320.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER WELUBOOSTER STN MNT/RPR j
17.07 UTIL-MISC SWR TRUCK SUPPLIES 00035231 217607 50431 5390.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES SWR EQUIPNEHICLE MISC MNTC/RP '�
20.07 UTIL-MISC TOOLS 00035231 217608 50641 5375.6211 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT SEWER MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR
12.32- UTIL-DISCOUNT 217609 5305.6333 GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS WATER MGMT/REPORT/DATA ENTRY
783.73
1501 71/30@012 700055 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC
403.05 IA1-NET PADS/SHARPENING STONE�069298 217420 91741 5205.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA 1 MANAGEMENT
403.05
1502 11/30/2012 122371 CANNON RIVER WINERY
420.00 WINE#1 00046665 217807 4879 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
204.00 WINE#1 00046665 217808 4920 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
510.00 W�NE#3 00046665 217809 4875 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES i
204.00 WWE#3 00046665 217810 4921 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES I
1, 338.00 I
1503 11/30/2072 100319 CENTERPOINT ENERGY
206.22 L�Q 1 OCT 217532 56265598 5025.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS LIQUOR #1 OPERATIONS
57.02 LIQ 2 OCT 217533 55533673 5065.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS LIQUOR #2 OPERATIONS
1,453.49 IA2 OCT 217534 55978928 5265.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS ARENA 2 BLDG MAINTENANCE-HAYES
34.62 WELL 1 OCT 217535 55887046 5320.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS WATER WELUBOOSTER STN MNT/RPR
26.74 WELL 2 OCT 217536 55675664 5320.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS WATER WELUBOOSTER STN MNT/RPR
28.01 WELL 4 OCT 217537 55851604 5320.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNTlRPR
47.35 WELL 5 OCT 217538 55851562 5320.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS WATER WELUBOOSTER STN MNT/RPR
387.85 UTIL WTP OCT 217539 55877872 5325.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS WATER TREATMENT FCLTY MNTC/RPR
16.45 460 REFLECTION RD OCT 217540 75761361 5380.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS SEWER LIFT STN REPAIR & MNTC
414.63 GOLF OCT 217541 96338967 5145.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS GOLF SHOP BUILDING MAINTENANCE
2,672.38
1504 11/30/2012 101741 CENTERPOINT ENERGY
352.92 FIRE STN 1 OCT 217542 55688184 1340.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS FIRE BLDG & GROUNDS MNTC
110.98 FIRE STN 2 OCT 217543 55851539 1340.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS FIRE BLDG 8 GROUNDS MNTC
86.28 FIRE STN 3 OCT 217544 55533657 1340.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS FIRE BLDG & GROUNDS MNTC
287.24 CMF STRG BLDG 1 OCT 217545 56034416 1540.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS CMF BUILDINGS & GROUNDS MNTC
19.24 CMF STRG BLDG 2 OCT 217546 55793483 1540.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS CMF BUILDINGS & GROUNDS MNTC
26.31 CMF STRG BLDG 3 OCT 217547 56696487 '' 1540.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS CMF BUILDINGS &' NDS MNTC
R55CKREG wG20000 CITYOFAPF. .�LLEY 11/� 25:47:04
Council Check Register Page - 3
10/16/2012 - 11/30/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
42.77 SWIM BLDG OCT 217548 56284078 1940.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS AQUATIC SWIM CENTER
27.38 SWIM PARK OCT 217549 79512695 1940.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS AQUATIC SWIM CENTER
35.25 HAGEMEISTER PK OCT 217550 56100324 1730.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE
58,07 VAL MID PK OCT 217551 55611420 1730.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE
29.78 DELANEY PARK OCT 217552 55372148 1730.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE
24.96 HUNTINGTON PK OCT 217553 56346620 1730.6256 UTI�ITIES-NATURAL GAS PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE
28.56 GALAXIE PK OCT 217554 55848238 1730.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE
29.18 AV EAST PK OCT 217555 55851521 1730.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE
35.22 TEEN CENTER OCT 217556 56281637 1730.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE
978.73 AVCC OCT 217557 55686299 1900.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS AV COMMUNITY CENTER
210.34 HCSC OCT 217558 79615332 1920.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS HAYES COMMUNITY & SENIOR CTR
46.07 SWIM OCT 217559 78955218 1940.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS AQUATIC SWIM CENTER
134.27 REDWOOD OCT 217560 55612972 1930.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS REDWOOD POOL '
2,563.55
1505 77/30/2012 � 700702 COLLEGE CITY BEVERAGE '
6,985.25 BEER#1 00000114 217779 360009 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
78.00 BEER#1 00000114 217780 130298 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
118.40- BEER#1 00000114 217781 517 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
6,482.30 BEER#1 00000114 217782 360058 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES i
120.00 BEER#1 00000114 217783 518 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES i
1,101.00 BEER#1 00000114 217784 360097 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES I
51.65 TAX#1 00000114 217785 360111 5015.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
7,654.60 BEER#1 00000114 277785 360111 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
1,476.35 BEER#1 00000114 217786 360130 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
779.65 BEER#1 00000114 217787 360147 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
70.00 BEER#1 00000114 217788 752 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
17.65 TAX#1 00000114 217789 350156 5015.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
8,477.95 BEER#1 00000114 217789 350156 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
17.65 TAX#1 00000114 217790 360199 5015.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
5,069.70 BEER#1 00000114 217790 360199 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
4,343.85 BEER#2 00000114 217791 360010 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
15.25- CMBEER#2 00000114 217792 457 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
30.40 TAX#2 00000114 217793 360059 5055.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
5,033.77 BEER#2 00000114 217793 360059 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
156.00 BEER#2 00000114 217794 360070 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES I
50.00 BEER#2 00000114 217795 360089 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES I
17.65 TAX#2 00000114 217796 360113 5055.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES �
3,258.30 BEER#2 00000114 217796 360113 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
1,095.75 BEER#2 00000114 217797 360157 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
135.00- CMBEER#2 00000114 217798 130346 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OFAPPLE VALLEY 11/29/20125:47:04 i
Council Check Register Page - 4
10/16/2012 -11/30/2012 '
I
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No inv No Account No Subledge Account DescripGon Business Unit
5,010.60 BEER#2 00000114 217799 360203 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
30.80 TAX#3 00000114 217800 360015 5085.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
3,438.05 BEER#3 00000114 217800 360015 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES j
30.80 TAX#3 00000114 217801 360058 5085.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
2,724.65 BEER#3 00000114 217801 360058 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
6,172.85 BEER#3 00000114 217802 360115 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES �
360.00 BEER#3 00000114 217803 729 5085.6530 BEER LI�UOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES �,
34.00 TAX#3 00000114 217804 360158 5085.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES I
6,903.05 BEER#3 00000114 217804 360158 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES I
17.55 TAX#3 00000114 217805 360204 5085.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES I
2,353.35 BEER#3 00000114 217805 360204 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES I
51.01- CMBEER#3 00000114 217806 996 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES I
79,153.51 �
7506 11/3012072 100729 DAKOTAAWARDS & ENGRAVING
19.24 FIRE-NAME TAGS-ILLG & NEPPL 00070433 217421 12895 1330.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE FIRE OPERATIONS
19.24 I I
1607 11130/2012 140567 DAKOTA PUMP 8 CONTROL
1,900.00 WQ-STORM LIFT STN ANNUAL INSP 217422 18067 5505.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT STORM DRAIN UTILITY I
270.36 UTIL-REPL CORD GRIPS LFT #10 217423 18070 5380.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT SEWER UFT STN REPAIR & MNTC I
2,170.36
1508 11/30/2072 700218 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC
386.37 SLU-BOLLARD LTS FOR 153RD ST 00069078 217424 963580419 5805.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND
386.37
7509 1113012012 101424 MORAN USA
56.69 FREIGHT#3 00038464 217778 79612 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
222.50 TAX#3 00038464 217778 79612 5085.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
325.50 LIQ#3 00038464 217778 79612 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
604.69
7510 11/3012012 101500 PREMIUM WATERS INC
22.14 POL-BOTTLED WATER 00058643 217479 3138051012 1250.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE FACILITY
64.16 GOLF BOTTLED WATER 00045408 217610 6182511012 5145.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF SHOP BUILDING MAINTENANCE
86.30
1511 11/3012012 100393 PUMP 8 METER SERVICE INC
330.17 SHOP-FLOOR CONTROL FOR HOISA0035198 217480 184311947850 1530.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS CMF SHOP EQUIP MNTC & REPAIR I
330.17 I
., . ..,, ', I
' i
�I
RSSCKREG �...�20000 CITYOFAPF ;LLEY 11I� r5:47:04
Council Check Register Page - 5
10/16/2012 -11/30/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledge Account Description Business Unit
7572 11/30/2012 700395 R& R SPECIALTIES OF WISCONSIN
45.75 IA1-SHARPEN ZAMBONI BLADES 00035403 217477 511151N 5215.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT ARENA 1 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
45.75 IA2-SHARPEN ZAMBONI BLADES 00035403 217477 511151N 5270.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT ARENA 2 EQUIPMENT MAINT-HAYES
91.50 I
1513 17130/2012 121942 SPRINT '
52.00 FIRE WIRELESS DATA LINE-NOV 00047541 217483 254688814060 1300.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS FIRE MANAGEMENT
156.00 POL WIRELESS DATA LINE-NOV 00047541 217483 254688814060 1205.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS POLICE RECORDS UNIT
208.00 ,
I
7514 11/30l2012 118481 STONEBROOKE EQUIPMENT
53.36 STR-PACKING KIT 00067250 217481 23373 1630.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS STREET EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
53.36
1515 77/30@012 100457 STREICHERS INC i
1,490.43 POL-PRACTICE AMMO 00051171 217482 1974313 1210.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES POIICE FIELD OPERATIONS/PATROL '
1,490.43
1576 71/30/2072 100566 TITLEIST I
.60- GOLF DISCOUNT 00068798 217484 1078941 5115.6423 GOLF-CASH DISCOUNT GOLF PRO SHOP I
9.14 GOLF FREIGHT 00068798 217484 1078941 5115.6424 GOLF FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE GOLF PRO SHOP
32.69 GOLF BACKPACK 00068798 217484 1078941 5115.6418 C�OLF-PRO SHOP OTHER GOLF PRO SHOP
41.23
7517 17/30/2012 137686 TOWMASTER
658.40 STR-ONSPOT TIRE CHAIN/PLATE 217490 343437 1630.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS STREET EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
658.40
1518 71/30/2012 700834 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC
208.89 GOLF-BELT/SEATASSEMBLY 00070279 217485 65473 5155.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS GOLF EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE I
208.89 I
1579 71I30I2072 100363 XCEL ENERGY '
66.32 POL GUN RANGE ELECTRIC 217486 5158758142 1255.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC POLICE GUN RANGE i
66.32
1620 71I30/2012 138342 YOCUM OIL COMPANY INC
11,517.76 UNLEADED GASOLINE 00050328 217487 524295 1000.1520 INVENTORY-SUPPLIES GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
10,536.40 UNLEADED GASOLINE 00050328 217488 524294 1000.1520 INVENTORY-SUPPLIES GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
22,054.16
1521 11/30/2012 100528 ZIEGLER INC I
i
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/29/20125:47:04 'i
R55CKREG LOG20000 I
Council Check Register Page - 6 I
10/16/2012 -11l30/2012 I
I
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledge Account Description Business Unit
11.87 UTIL-FILTER-CAT GENERATOR 217489 PC001425721 5380.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS SEWER LIFT STN REPAIR & MNTC
11.87
249979 71/27/2012 700311 METRO COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SV
378.40- RETAINED % OCTOBER 217425 20121031 5301.4999 MISC UTILITY REVENUE WATER & SEWER FUND REVENUE '
37,840.00 SAC COLLECTION OCTOBER 217425 20121031 5301.4922 SAC COLLECTIONS WATER & SEWER FUND REVENUE �,
37,461.60
249980 17/28/2012 743786 DEWITT, JAMES
52.91 REF OVPMT UTIL-12568 EVEREST C 217629 20121121 5301.4997 WATER/SEWER ACCT REFUNDS WATER & SEWER FUND REVENUE
52.91
249981 11/28/2012 143787 MEREDYK, CATHERINE
89.73 REF OVPMT UTIL-5038 148TH PATH 217630 20121121 5301.4997 WATER/SEWER ACCT REFUNDS WATER & SEWER FUND REVENUE
69.73 '
249982 77/28/2012 143788 PARRUCCI, DAVID
18.30 REF OVPMT UTIL-5225 145TH ST W 217631 20121121 5301.4997 WATER/SEWER ACCT REFUNDS WATER & SEWER FUND REVENUE
18.30
249983 11/28/2012 138336 BERNICK'S BEVERAGE
189.00 BEER #7 00050356 217754 25395 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
40.00 TAX#1 00050356 217755 27086 5015.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
iD0.00 NOTAX#1 00050356 217755 27086 5015.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
241.35 BEER#1 00050356 217756 27087 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
593.30 BEER#2 00050356 217757 25398 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES '
40.00 TAX#3 00050356 217758 25393 5085.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
100.00 NOTAX#3 00050356 217758 25393 5085.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES '
1,303.65
249984 17/28/2012 100073 J J TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING CO OF
38.80 NOTAX#1 00000116 217760 1904380 5015.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
5,050.99 BEER#1 00000116 217760 1904380 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
4,585.46 BEER#1 U0000116 217761 1932021 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES ,
15.00 TAX#1 00000116 217762 1932055 5015.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
44.60 NOTAX#1 00000116 217762 1932055 5015.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES I
3,282.54 BEER#1 00000116 217762 1932055 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
197.00 BEER#1 00000116 217763 1932056 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
38.80 NOTAX#1 00000116 217764 1932110 5015.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
7,548.05 BEER#1 00000116 217764 7932110 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
74.00 BEER#1 00000116 217765 1932111 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
15.00 TAX#1 00000116 217766 1932160 5015.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #1 STOCK 'HASES
R55CKREG WG20000 CITY OF APP. ,,.LLEY 11/� ,5:47:04
Council Check Register Page - 7
10/16/2012 -11/30/2012
Check # Date Amount S upplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledge Account Description Business Unit
4,384.05 BEER#1 00000116 217766 1932160 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
140.75 BEER#1 00000116 217767 1932167 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
2,109.50 BEER#2 00000116 217768 1932011 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
2,887.65 BEER#2 00000116 217769 1932067 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
44.80 BEER#2 00000116 217770 1932073 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
2,217.49 BEER#2 00000116 217771 1932093 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
88.00 BEER#2 00000116 277772 1932120 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
1,787.22 BEER#2 00000116 217773 1932144 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
44.60 NOTAX#3 00000116 217774 1932013 5085.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
3,465.45 BEER#3 00000116 217774 1932013 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
23.00 TAX#3 0�000116 217775 1932066 5085.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
38.80 NOTAX#3 00000116 217775 1932066 5085.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
2,161.39 BEER#3 00000116 217775 1932066 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
3,379.07 BEER#3 00000116 217776 1932115 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
15.00 TAX#3 00000116 217777 1932143 5085.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
38.80 NOTAX#3 00000116 217777 1932143 5085.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
3,388.02 BEER#3 00000116 217777 1932143 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
47,103.83
249985 11/28/2012 100021 MAMUNDSON LLP
23.20 TAX#3 00044390 217759 142052 5085.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
555.59 NOTAX#3 00044390 217759 142052 5085.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
578.79
249986 11/28/2012 100751 PHILLIPS WINE 8 SPIRITS INC
20.00 TAX#1 00000106 217332 2329859 5015.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE IIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
20.00 NOTAX#1 00000106 217333 2329859 5015.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
59.90 TAX#3 00000106 217334 2329862 5085.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
56.00 TAX#3 00000106 217335 2333585 5085.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIG�UOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
4,810.92 LIQ#1 00000106 217336 2329857 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
1,049.54 LIQ#1 00000106 217337 2333578 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
1,835.00 LIQ#1 00000106 217338 2333580 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
806.39 LIQ#2 00000106 217339 2329860 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
2,557.05 LIQ#3 00000106 217340 2329861 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
550.50 LIQ#3 00000106 217341 2333583 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
5,669.65 WINE#1 00000106 217342 2326147 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
1,330.89 WINE#1 00000106 217343 2326150 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
232.00 VNNE#1 00000106 217344 2327597 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
252.00 VNNE#1 00000106 217345 2329858 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
3,731.88 WINE#1 00000106 217346 2333579 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
1,170.72 WINE#1 00000106 217347 2333581 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OFAPPLE VALLEY 11/29/201�5:47:04
Council Check Register Page - 8 I
10/16/2012 -11 /30/2012 I
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit I
312.00 WINE#1 00000106 217348 2335299 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES I
432.00 WINE#2 00000106 217349 2326148 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES �,
340.03 WINE#2 00000106 217350 2326154 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES I
2,077.76 WINE#2 00000106 217351 2333582 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES �
772.00 WINE#3 00000106 217352 2326149 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES �
1,104.00 WINE#3 00000106 217353 2326152 5085.6520 VNNE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
2,042.20 WINE#3 00000106 217354 2326155 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES I
740.80 WINE#3 00000106 217355 2326157 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
3,285.56 WINEl�3 00000106 217356 2333584 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
35,258.79
249987 77/28/2072 700524 SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF MN
220.95 LIQ#1 00050756 217357 1893765 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
81.05 LIQ#1 00050756 217358 1894161 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
81.05 LIQ#1 00050756 217359 1894163 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
90.00 LIQ#1 00050756 217360 1894432 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
92.62 LIQ#1 00050756 217361 1896477 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
592.59 LIQ#1 00050756 217362 1897389 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
9,455.48 LIQ#1 00050756 217363 1901293 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
1,134.70 LIQ#1 00050756 217364 1908593 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
40.68 LIQ#1 00050756 217365 1909618 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
4,947.53 LIQ#1 00050756 217366 1912394 5015.6510 LIQUOR �IQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
76.65- CMLIQ#1 00050756 217367 1902881 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
24.45- CMLIQ#1 00050756 217368 1904978 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
11.24- CMLIQ#1 00050756 217369 1906942 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
18.45- CMLIQ#1 00050756 217370 1908193 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
7.49- CMLIQ#1 00050756 217371 1909671 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
896.00 WINE#1 00050756 217372 1907917 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
84.00- WINE#1 00050756 217373 1902896 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
1,723.00 WINE#1 00050756 217374 1918924 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
1,456.00 WINE#1 00050756 217375 1908028 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
456.00 WINE#1 00050756 217376 1929436 5015.6520 1MNE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES i
176.00- CMWINE#1 00050756 217377 1924715 5015.6520 VNNE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
1,771.00 WINE#1 00050756 217378 1918954 5015,6520 WINE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES '
225.00- CMWINE#1 00050756 217379 1924716 5015.6520 WINE UQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
85.62 WINE#1 00050756 217380 1936818 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
73.65 LIQ#2 00050756 217381 1893763 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
81.05 LIQ#2 00050756 217382 1894160 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
162.10 LIQ#2 00050756 217383 1894169 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
90.00 LIQ#2 00050756 217384 1894434 5055.6510 LIQUOR IIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
189.84 LIQ#2 00050756 217385 1897392 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
R55CKREG �vG20000 CITYOFAPF �LLEY 11/:. A5:47:04
Council Check Register Page - 9
10/16/2012 -11/30/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledge Account Description Business Unit
2,042.68 LIQ#2 00050756 217386 1901285 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
99.98- LIQ#2 00050756 217387 1905987 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
8.00- CMLIQ#2 00050756 217388 1908130 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR !�2 STOCK PURCHASES
117.60 LIQ#2 00050756 217389 1902864 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
243.15 LIQ#2 00050756 217390 1908595 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES I
40.68 LIQ#2 00050756 217391 1909619 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
1,104.71 LIQ#2 00050756 217392 1912397 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
32.81- CMLIQ#2 00050756 217393 1906948 5055.6510 UQUOR LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES !
160.00 WINE#2 00050756 217394 1894938 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
357.00 WINE#2 00050756 217395 190791 B 5055.6520 WINE LiQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
978.65 WINE#2 00050756 217396 1918922 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES '
584.00 WINE#2 00050756 217397 1908029 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
362.00 WINE#2 00050756 217398 1918985 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
240.00 WINE#2 00050756 217399 1936823 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
147.30 LIQ#3 00050756 217400 1893761 5085.6510 LIQUOR L�QUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
270.00 LIQ#3 00050756 217401 1894433 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
507.09 LIQ#3 00050756 217402 1896553 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
643.99 LIQ#3 00050756 217403 1897393 5085.6510 L�QUOR LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
3,749.83 LIQ#3 00050756 217404 1901286 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
63.00- CMLIQ#3 00050756 217405 1910267 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES ,
1,134.85 LIQ#3 00050756 217406 1901287 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES I
89.90 LIQ#3 00050756 217407 1904849 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
40.68 LIQ#3 00050756 217408 1909620 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
2,512.45 LIQ#3 00050756 217409 1913725 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
8.50- CMLIQ#3 00050756 217410 1910211 5085.6510 IIQUOR LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
809.60 WINE#3 00050756 217411 1894939 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
2,733.01 WINE#3 00050756 217412 1907919 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
560.00 WINE#3 00050756 217413 1918892 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
1,738.44 WINE#3 00050756 217414 1918921 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
508.00 WINE#3 00050756 217415 1918923 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
2,288.60 WINE#3 00050756 217416 1908030 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES ',
360.00 WINE#3 00050756 217417 1918982 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES ,
1,200.27 WINE#3 00050756 217418 1918988 5065.6520 WINE LIQUOR �3 STOCK PURCHASES '
1,481.00 WINE#3 00050756 217419 1929437 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES I
49,890.82 I
249988 11/2812012 100073 BREITUNG, CORY L
129.99 UTIL-BOOTS 217624 20121114 5365.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHINGALLOWANCE SEWERMGMT/REPORTS/DATAENTRY
129.99
249989 11/28/2012 120400 BRENNq GARRON D
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/29/20125:47:04 '
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register Page - 10 ,
10/16/2012 -11/30/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
26.99 PK-JEANS 217625 20121116 1710.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE PARK MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT
26.99
249990 11128/2012 100648 OTTO, KENNETH N
49.98 GOLF-JEANS 217626 20121120 5105.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING AILOWANCE GOLF MANAGEMENT
49.98
249991 71I28/2072 120502 ROTHER, STEPHEN F
120.00 PK-JEANS 217627 20121113 1710.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE PARK MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT
120.00
249992 71/2812012 700587 THOMPSON, NEALON P
38.57 FIRE-FOOD FOR FIRE CALL 217628 20121113 1330.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE OPERATIONS
38.57
249993 11/28/2072 100989 10000 LAKES CHAPTER
210.00 2012 IBC FUNDAMENTALS-HARMSEN 217469 20121128 1460.6275 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL INSPECTIONS TRAINING
210.00
249994 71/28/2012 139788 1-8D0-GOT-JUNK
300.00 CODE-JUNK RMVL-229 WALNUT LN 217468 251291 1013.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES CODE ENFORCEMENT
300.00 '
249995 11128/2012 100040 APPLE VALLEY MUNICIPAL LIQUOR
150.00 REC GIFT CERTS FOR BB LEAGUE 217500 1870.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REC BASKETBALL
150.00 REC GIFT CERTS FOR KB LEAGUE 217501 1855.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REC FOOTBALL & SOCCER
960.00 REC GIFT CERTS FOR VB LEAGUE 217502 1860.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REC VOLLEYBALL
1,260.00 I
249996 11/28/2012 101382 AQUA LOGIC INC ',
629.09 POOL-CIRCUIT BOARD FOR REDWOOD 217426 39907 1930.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REDWOOD POOL ,
629.09
249997 11/28/2012 100747 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES INC I
42.96 SHOP-UNIFORM RENT NOV 00046863 217498 6297620281 1530.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE CMF SHOP EQUIP MNTC & REPAIR
42.96 STR-UNIFORM RENT NOV 00046863 217498 6297620281 1600.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE STREET MANAGEMENT j
42.97 PK-UNIFORM RENT NOV 00046863 217498 6297620281 1710.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE PARK MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT ,
42.97 UTIL-UNIFORM RENT NOV 00046863 217498 6297620281 5305.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE WATER MGMT/REPORT/DATA ENTRY ',
25.22 SHOP-UNIFORM RENT NOV 00046863 217499 6297625081 1530.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE CMF SHOP EQUIP MNTC & REPAIR
25.22 STR-UNIFORM RENT NOV 00046863 217499 6297625081 1600.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE STREET MANAGEMENT
25.22 PK-UNIFORM RENT NOV 00046863 217499 6297625081 1710.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE PARK MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT
25.23 UTIL-UNIFORM RENT NOV 00046863 217499 6297625081 5305.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE WATER MGMT/REF 7ATA ENTRY
R55CKREG �.»20000 CITYOFAPF :LLEY 11/I �5:47:04
Council Check Register Page - 11
10/16l2012 —11/30/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledge Account Description Business Unit
272.75
249998 11/28/2012 118892 ASPEN MILLS
22.75 FIRE-NAMETAG-LIEUT HOCHSPRUPII9048355 217427 128036 1300.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE FIRE MANAGEMENT
2275
249999 11/28/2012 119452 AW DIRECT INC
100.34 POL-INFLATABLEAIR WEDGE 00067469 217428 1019149894 1200.6211 SMALLTOOLS & EQUIPMENT POIICE MANAGEMENT
100.34
250000 11/28/2012 700709 BATTERIES PLUS
93.40 CABLE-ALKALINE BATTERIES 00070060 217429 17269343 2012.6215 EQUIPMENT PARTS CABLE TV JOINT POWERS
93.40
250001 17/28/2012 100064 BAUER BUILT INC
437.61 PK-TIRES #246 00035172 217430 180087079 1765.6216 VEHICLES-TIRES/BATTERIES PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
437.61
250002 17/28/2012 143785 BLUEWATER CAPITAL MGMT 11, LLC
149,900.00 DEVELOPMENTASSIST WISE SWIM 217611 20121128 4705.6399 OTHER CHARGES TIF 13-SPENDING PLAN
149,900.00
250003 11/28/2012 100072 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION
271.50 CBL LAKE SOUTH SHORE 7TH 217503 360687 4502.6235 2012151G CONSUITANT SERVICES CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
328.75 CBL LAKE SOUTH SHORE 7TH 217504 361154 4502.6235 2012151G CONSULTANT SERVICES CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
600.25
250004 11/28I2012 116142 GARGILL INCORPORATED
15,784.86 STR-CLEARLANE ENHANCED DEICff10051240 217431 2900814517 1665.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET SNOW & ICE MATERIALS
15,784.86 I
250005 17/28/2012 128535 CARTEGRAPH SYSTEMS IN
1,125.00 CARTEGRAPH SWR &WTR CONVERSION 217470 201113607 5305.6235 2011136G CONSULTANT SERVICES WATER MGMTlREPORT/DATA ENTRY
1,125.00 ,
I
250006 11/28/2012 110648 CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS RECEIVABLE I
44.40 APS TRANSACTION FEES 277471 400413003314 1205.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES POLICE RECORDS UNIT
44.40
250007 71/28/2012 130960 COLD SPRING GRANITE COMPANY
350.00 CEMETERY-CUSTOM EMBLEMS 00040685 217432 1526583A 5605.6325 COLUMBARIUM CEMETERY '
181.80 CEM-NICHE PLAQUE J STINSON 00040685 217433 1526154A 5605.6325 COLUMBARIUM CEMETERY i
I
CITY OF APPIE VALLEY 11/29/201a 5:47:04
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register Page - 12
10/16/2012 -11/30/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
181.80 CEM-NICHE PLAQUE R/N KELLY 00040685 217434 40685 5605.6325 COLUMBARIUM CEMETERY
203.40 CEM-DOUBLE HEARTS MARRIED EMBQ40685 217435 1525656A 5605.6325 COLUMBARIUM CEMETERY
917.00
250008 11I28/2012 143778 CONSTRUCTION CLEANING SERVICES
2,200.00 FINAL CONST CLEANING NEW CLU819051189 217493 1522 5190.6810 2011137G CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS GOLF CLUBHOUSE CONSTRUCTION
2,200.00
250009 11/28/2012 142662 CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU
6,026.80 LODGING TAX-OCT 2012 217472 20121128 7005.6319 REIMBURSEMENT OF REV COLL FOR LODGING TAX
6,026.80
250010 71I28/2012 702289 CRAGUNS CONFERENCE CENTER
180.00 MN CRIME PREV-HOI.ES-BRAINERD 217473 20121016 1225.6276 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP OTHERPOLICE TRAINING
180.00 MN CRIME PREV-WALTER-BRAINERD 217473 20121016 1225.6276 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP OTHERPOLICE TRAINING
360.00
250011 11/2812012 100774 CUB FOODS
35.56 REC-LIL CHEFS SUPPLfES 00070130 217505 1875.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REC PRESCHOOL PROGRAMS
25.85 UTIL-HYDROGEN PEROXIDE, ALC019m069612 217506 5325.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT FCLTY MNTClRPR
26.64 STR-SNOWPLOW MEETING 00069759 217507 1600.6275 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL STREET MANAGEMENT
42.35 POL-BEVERAGES, COOKIES MULTI 610070358 217508 1275.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES POL COMMUN OUTREACH/CRIME PREV
130.40
250012 11/28/2012 100776 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO INC
711.07 PK-HYDRAULICISUCTION FILTER 00050726 217436 158792 1765.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
711.07
250013 11/28/2012 100124 DAKOTA COUNTY PROPERTY RECORDS I
46.00 CLERKABSTRACT FILING FEE OCT 217615 233440 1015.6239 PRINTING CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS I
46.00 CLERK TORRENS FILING FEE OCT 217615 233440 1015.6239 PRINTING CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS ,
92.00
250014 11128/2012 100123 DAKOTA COUNTY TREASURER
5,277.32 STR SIGNALS MAINT 217509 4007 1680.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES TRAFFIC SIGNS/SIGNALS/MARKERS I
888.61 SL SIGNALS ELECTRIC-1ST QTR 217510 4069 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND �
1,000.76 SL SIGNALS ELECTR�C-2ND QTR 217511 4084 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND
1,061.33 SL SIGNALS ELECTRIC-3RD QTR 217512 4100 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND
8,228.02
250015 11/28/2012 129764 DAKOTA COUNTY TREASURER-AUDITO
2,070.14 POl RADIOS-OCT 217526 OCT12 ; 1200.6280 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE MANAGEN
R55CKREG Lv1i20000 CITYOFAPP.,, ,,,LLEY 11/'a �5:47:04
Council Check Register Page - 13
10/16/2012 -11l30/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledge Account Des Business Unit
93.04 PW RADIOS-OCT 217527 OCT12 1500.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES PW MANAGEMENT
1,465.38 FIRE RADIOS-OCT 217528 OCT12 1300.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES FIRE MANAGEMENT
604.74 POL RADIO BATTERIES 217529 OCT12 1200.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS POLICE MANAGEMENT
27.18 PW RADIO BATTERIES 217530 OCT12 1500.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS PW MANAGEMENT
428.08 FIRE RADIO BATTERIES 217531 OCT12 1300.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS FIRE MANAGEMENT
4,685.56
250016 77/28/2072 100407 EMERGENCYAUTOMOTIVETECHNOLOG
319.56 ENG-FRONTIER MiNI LIGHTBAR 00038694 277437 JC1107129 1510.6211 SMALL TOOLS 8 EQUIPMENT PW ENGINEERING & TECHNiCAL
319.56
250017 11I28I2012 100420 FISCHER MINING, LLC
344.50 UTIL-FILL SAND, WTR BRK, WALNU 00035242 217616 5275 5330.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES WTR MAIN/HYDRANT/CURB STOP MNT
344.50
250018 11/28/2012 143678 FLEETPRIDE
94.07 STR-PARK BRAKE CHAMBER #319 00035175 217438 50908769 1630.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS STREET EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
94.07
250019 17/28/2012 101056 FORCE AMERICA DISTRIBUTING LLC
77.17 UTIL-HYD HOSE #401 00035441 277439 1394691 5390.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS SWR EQUIPNEHICLE MISC MNTC/RP
77.17
260020 77/28/2072 100768 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF MN
205.97 GOLF DATALINE NOV 217613 222310022612228 5105.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS GOLF MANAGEMENT
205.97
250027 71/28/2072 101507 GALAXIE CAR CARE CENTER
259.89 POL CAR WASH-OCT 00038833 217515 1571001 1210.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT POLICE FIELD OPERATIONS/PATROL
29.00 FIRE CAR WASH-OCT 00039194 217516 1571021 1350.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT FIRE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
14.00 CH CAR WASH-OCT 00043279 217517 1571397 1060.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT MUNICIPAL BLDG & GROUNDS MNTC
10.50 ENG CAR WASH-OCT 217518 1571598 1510.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT PW ENGINEERING & TECHNICAL
313.39
250022 11/28/2072 142832 GENESIS EMPLOYEE BENEFITS INC
600.00 FSA MONTHLY FEE JAN-JUNE 217440 16596 1020.6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES
2,160.00 HRACLAIMS PROCESSING JAN-JUNE 217440 16596 1020.6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES
2,760.00
250023 11/28/2012 143783 HOLMIN HEATING & COOLING
299.00 LIQ-CLEAN & FIX HEATiNG 00067783 217491 695993 5025.6266 REPAIRS-BUILDING LIQUOR #1 OPERATIONS
299.00
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/29/201 a 5:47:04
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register Page - 14
10/16/2012 - 11/30/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Expianation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
250024 11I28/2072 143777 ILSTRUP, DORLENE
280.00 REFUND OVERCHARGE FOR EMBL�Diffi9761 217492 R106485 5601.4612 GRAVE/URN DIGGING CEMETERY REVENUE
280.00
260025 17/28/2012 136639 IMPACT PROVEN SOLUTIONS
804.35 UTIL-PRINT/MAIL BILLS OCT 217614 70278 5303.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES UTILITY BILLING
1,651.37 UTIL-POSTAGE OCT 217614 70278 5303.6238 POSTAGE/UPS/FEDEX UTILITY BILLING
2,455.72
250026 17/28/2072 107796 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEM OF M
397.41 HAYESARENAEDGERBATTERIES 00042258 217441 180011863 5270.6216 VEHICLES-TIRES/BATTERIES ARENA2EQUIPMENTMAINT-HAYES
397.41
250027 11/28/2012 117243 JERRY'S TRANSMISSION SERVICE I
200.63 FIRE-WINDOW REGULATOR #4983 00070702 217442 20190 1350.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS FIRE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
200.63
250028 17/2812072 113594 JR'S ADVANCED RECYCLERS
135.00 GOLF-OLDAPPLIANCES DISPOSAL 217461 79987 5110.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVGOLF CLUBHOUSE BUILDING
135.00
250029 11/28/2072 143779 KOENIG, MICHELLE
410.42 MISC DECOR FOR LS#1 REMODEL 217494 20121128 5000.1770 2012133G CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
410.42
250030 11/28/2012 122230 LARSON COMPANIES LTD INC, WD
339.33 POL-BRAKE PADS/ROTORS 00035819 217443 F223060042 1210.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS POLICE FIELD OPERATIONS/PATROL
31.23 UTIL-FILTER 00035819 217444 6223120283 5390.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS SWR EQUIP/VEHICLE MISC MNTC/RP
370.56
250031 11/28/2012 176377 LOFFLER
650.56 IT COLOR COPIER MAINT 8/21-11/ 00049787 217445 1484559 1030.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
228.00 LIQ3 COPIER MAINT 10/12-10/13 00049490 217446 1478691 5095.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT LIQUOR #3 OPERATIONS
158.18 IT TONER FOR PD EVIDENCE RM 217447 1480994 1030.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
349.48 IA1 TONER 217448 1476908 5210.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES ARENA 1 BUILDING MAINTENANCE
127.18 LIQ3 TONER 217449 1478341 5095.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES LIQUOR #3 OPERATIONS
137.87- IT RETURNED DEFECTIVE TONER FO 217450 1468596A 1030.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
1, 375.53
250032 11/28/2012 700934 LUBRICATION TECHNOLOGIES INC
148.71 PK-MOBILMET S CUTTING OIL 00051131 217451 2128837 ' 1765.6212 MOTOR FUELS/OILS PARK EQUIPMENT' 'TENANCE
R55CKREG �`Lv�20�00 CITYOFAPP. :LLEY 11/� ;5:47:04
Council Check Register Page - 15
10/16/2012 -11/30/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledge Account Description Business Unit
148.71
250033 71l28/2072 100568 MACTA
195.00 MACTA CONF - MOORE 217474 4729247 2012.6275 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAI CABLE N JOINT POWERS
195.00 MACTA CONF - DEVINE 217475 4729248 2012.6275 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL CABLE N JOINT POWERS
390.00
250034 11/28/2072 100294 MAIL PACK 8� SHIP
10.48 UTIL-SHIP WTR SAMPLES MDH 00069609 217476 AV027 5325.6238 POSTAGE/UPS/FEDEX WATER TREATMENT FCLTY MNTC/RPR
10.48
250035 11I28/2012 102231 MELLEMA, DOUG
50.00 REC-SANTA TREE LIGHTING 00070145 217452 20121128 1800.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES REC PROGRAM GENERAL
125.00 REC-BREAKFAST SANTA 12/01/12 00070145 217453 20121201 1845.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES REC SELF SUPPORT PROG GENERAL
175.00
250036 11/28/201T 100377 METRO COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SV
192,329.00 WASTEWATER SVC-DEC 217454 1002457 5365.6317 METRO WASTE CONTROL PAYMENT SEWER MGMTlREPORTS/DATA ENTRY
192,329.00
250037 71I28/2012 100574 MIZUNO USA INC
19.24- GOLF-DISCOUNT 00070280 217617 3427030RI 5115.6423 GOLF-CASH DISCOUNT GOLF PRO SHOP
8.41 GOLF-FREIGHT 00070280 217617 3427030RI 5115.6424 GOLF FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE GOLF PRO SHOP ��
384.75 GOLF-SWEATERS, HEGLAND 00070280 217617 3427030RI 5115.6413 GOLF-CAPS/HATS/CLOTHING GOLF PRO SHOP �
373.92
250038 11128/2072 100334 MN DEPT OF HEALTH
332.00 REC FOOD LICENSE-TEEN CTR 2013 217513 1840.6280 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS REC TEEN PROGRAMS
332.00 RQP FOOD LICENSE 2013 217514 1945.6280 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS QUARRY POINTE
24,110.00 UTIL WTR SVC CONNECT FEE-4TH Q 217623 20121128 5300.2332 STATE WATER TESTING FEE WATER & SEWER FUND BAL SHEET
24,774.00
250039 11128/2072 100337 MN DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY
10.00 FIRE BOILER CERT-ST#2 217619 ABR00593861 1340.6399 OTHER CHARGES FIRE BLDG & GROUNDS MNTC
40.00 SWIM BOILER CERT 217620 ABR00577501 1940.6399 OTHER CHARGES AQUATIC SWIM CENTER
10.00 HCSC BOILER CERT 217621 ABR00577511 1920.6399 OTHER CHARGES HAYES COMMUNITY & SENIOR CTR '
30.00 IA2 BOILER CERT 217622 ABR00577521 5265.6399 OTHER CHARGES ARENA 2 BLDG MAINTENANCE-HAYES I
90.00 I
250040 11128/2012 700348 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO
126.70 GOLF-MULCHING KITS 00035360 217519 87677200 5155.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS GOLF EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
57.71 GOLF-MULCHING KITS 00035360 217520 87677202 5155.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS GOLF EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/29/201 � 5:47:04
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register Page - 16
10/16I2012 -11l30/2012
Check # Date Amount Suppiier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
115.43 GOLF-MULCHING KITS 00035360 217521 87677201 5155.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS GOLF EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
514.63 PK-IRRIGATION PARTS 00035349 217522 87817200 1780.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK HIGH SCHOOL #4 FIELDS
814.47
250041 77/28/2012 143780 MYHER, KYLE TRAN
100.00 REC-PERFORMANCE DEC 4, 2012 00070146 217495 20121119 1845.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES REC SELF SUPPORT PROG GENERAL
100.00
250042 11128/2012 143787 NARATE JUDIE KEYS
250.00 REC-FLYER POETRY JAM 00070136 217496 20121114 1840.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REC TEEN PROGRAMS
250.00
2b0043 71/28/2012 1T4258 NFPA
26.50 FIRE-FPWADULT T-SHIRT 00070424 217455 5651107Y 1320.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE PREVENTION
26.50
250044 11/28/2012 143782 PIMENTAL,ANDREW
319.78 P& R DIR CANDIDATE TRAVEL EXP 217497 20121128 1020.6399 OTHER CHARGES HUMAN RESOURCES I
319.78
250045 17/28l2012 141548 POWER PROCESS EQUIPMENT INC
374.80 UTIL-RESET FLOATS 10" HIGHER 217456 384939 5380.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT SEWER LIFT STN REPAIR & MNTC
374.80
250046 71/28/2012 112033 PRATHER, ROD I �
267.19 PK-CARPET CLEANING 00070553 217467 643052 1730.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE
17,�g_ 00070553 217467 643052 1000.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
250.00
250047 11128/2012 143336 PREMIER LOCATING INC
320.00 SL-ELECTRIC LOCATES 00051167 217457 34581 5805.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND
320.00
250048 11/28/2072 701235 SAFETY SIGNS
1,009.34 STR-PAINT DBL YLLW GERMANE/127 217458 123986 1685.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES STREET MARKINC, & TRAFFIC CONTR
1, 009.34
I
250049 11/28/2072 719199 SHEPPARD,TINAA I
60.00 REC WINE GLASS PAINT CLASS 11/ 00070133 217618 20121128 1845.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES REC SELF SUPPORT PROG GENERAL
60.00
250050 11/2P" ? 100329 SUN NEWSPAPERS /
R55CKREG ��v20000 CITYOFAPF tLLEY 11/. 15:47:04
Council Check Register Page - 17
10l16/2012 —11/30/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explana PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledge Account Description Business Unit
758.78 LIQ-FALL WINE SALE 10/12l12 AD 00035309 217459 1403786 5005.6239 PRINTING LIQUOR GENERAL OPERATIONS
758.78 LIQ-FALL WINE SALE 10//12 AD 00035309 217460 1406151 5005.6239 PRINTING LIQUOR GENERAL OPERATIONS
1,517.56
250051 11128l2072 720666 SYMBOL ARTS
197.72 POL-CHAPLAIN BADGES 00067545 217462 1754771N 1200.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE POLICE MANAGEMENT
�2.72- 00067545 217462 175477IN 1000.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
185.00
250052 11/28/2012 100470 TIMES SQUARE SHOPPING CENTER
10,000.00 LIQ1 LEASE - DEC 217523 5025.6310 RENTAL EXPENSE LIQUOR #1 OPERATIONS
2,294.99 LIQ1 TAX ESCROW - DEC 217524 5025.6310 RENTAL EXPENSE LIQUOR #1 OPERATIONS
1,410.64 LIQ1 CAM ESCROW- DEC 217525 5025.6310 RENTAL EXPENSE LIQUOR #1 OPERATIONS
13,705.63 !
260053 71/28/2012 142499 TITAN MACHINERY
19.80 STR-BRAKE FLUID 00070703 217463 127703PC 1630.6212 MOTOR FUELS/OILS STREET EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE '
19.80
250055 11/28/2012 142587 U S HEALTH WORKS MEDICAL GRP M
279.00 POL-EMPL PHYSICAL DAVID ENGEL 217465 13798MN 1200.6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES POUCE MANAGEMENT I
279.00 ,
I I
260056 11/28/2012 100489 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED I
143.26 POL-EMBROIDERED SHIRTS 00070504 217464 141613 1200.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING AILOWANCE POLICE MANAGEMENT
14326
250057 11l28I2012 143538 UNIVERSITYOFMINNESOTA
200,00 57TH BLDG OFFICIAL INST-KINGSL 217612 20121128 1310.6275 SCHOOLSICONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL FIRE TRAINING ,
200.00 i
I
250058 11/28/2072 738341 WINDMILL FEED 8 PET SUPPLY CO �,
141.26 POL-FOOD FOR K-9 00067474 217466 652513 1281.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE K-9 i
I
14126
250059 77/2812012 100296 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MIN - BEER INC I
72.00 GOLF-KTN BEER 00011037 217478 984991 5120.6419 GOIF-BEER GOLF KITCHEN I
72.00
250060 11/28/2072 100656 MN DEPT OF COMMERCE ',
10.64 POL HOT PLATE 69199 050608 1215.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DETECTIVE UNIT '
Supplier 110857 WESTBERG, KAREN A.
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/29/20125:47:04
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register Page - 18
10/16/2012 -11/30/2012
Check # Date Amount Suppiier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
120.00 REC SCHL REG (12) 00059215 127209 1825.6275 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL REC SUMMER PLAYGROUND ACTIVITY I
Supplier 132018 YMCA SOUTHWEST BRANCH
39.58 REF OVPMT UTIL 966 REDWOOD DR 127836 5301.4997 WATER/SEWER ACCT REFUNDS WATER & SEWER FUND REVENUE
Supplier 132260 DANIELS, GARY P I
60.42 REF OVPMT UTIL 966 REDWOOD DR 128708 5301.4997 WATERlSEWER ACCT REFUNDS WATER & SEWER FUND REVENUE ,
Supplier 132260 DANIELS, GARY P �
6.32 REF OVPMT UTIL 15562 FINCH AV 129489 5301.4997 WATER/SEWER ACCT REFUNDS WATER & SEWER FUND REVENUE I
Supplier 132659 CHOTOROV, YEVGENIY
24.79 REF OVPMT UTIL 7094 158TH ST W 129490 5301.4997 WATER/SEWER ACCT REFUNDS WATER & SEWER FUND REVENUE
Supplier 101640 EDINA REALTY TITLE I�
67.70 REF OVPMT UTIL 889 REDWELL LN 129492 5301.4997 WATER/SEWER ACCT REFUNDS WATER & SEWER FUND REVENUE
Supplier 128991 FIRST FINANCIAL TITLE AGENCY O I
175.23 REF OVPMT UTIL 101 SHASTA CT 130655 5301.4997 WATER/SEWER ACCT REFUNDS WATER & SEWER FUND REVENUE ,
Supplier 128991 FIRSTFINANCIALTITLEAGENCYO
6.06 REF OVPMT UTIL 5982 134TH ST C 130957 5301.4997 WATER/SEWER ACCT REFUNDS WATER & SEWER FUND REVENUE
Supplier 133672 IGNATOVA, TETYANA
150.00 REFUND TOURNAMENT FEES - 2008 131249 22231 1001.4356 RECREATION LEAGUE ENTRY FEES GENERAL FUND REVENUE
Supplier 133704 HINRICHS, KEITH
126.00 REF AVFAC ADMISSIONS 8-12-08 131367 AVFACFTGT 1001.4330 SWIM CENTER REVENUE GENERAL FUND REVENUE I
Supplier 133911 SALVATION ARMY ,
9.77 REC MILEAGE SEPT 132833 1805.6277 MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE REC PUPPET WAGON I
Supplier 134303 PRICE, RACHAEL ,
38.88 REF OVPMT UTIL 176 COUNTY RD42 134848 5301.4997 WATER/SEWER ACCT REFUNDS WATER & SEWER FUND REVENUE ,
Supplier 135030 CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC
7.90 REF OVPMT UTIL 14430 FLORA WAY 135289 5301.4997 WATER/SEWER ACCT REFUNDS WATER 8 SEWER FUND REVENUE
Supplier 135241 OSMANSKI, DIANNE
111.41 REF OVPMT UTIL 13751 FORDHAM A 137355 5301.4997 WATER/SEWER ACCT REFUNDS WATER & SEWER FUND REVENUE
Supplier 135836 AHMED, SAYED
23.91 REF OVPMT UTIL 15950 HYLAND PT 137857 5301.4997 WATER/SEWER ACCT REFUNDS WATER & SEWER FUND REVENUE
Supplier 128991 FIRSTFINANCIALTITLEAGENCYO �
61.63 REF OVPMT UTIL 14260 EMPIRE AV 138947 5301.4997 WATER/SEWER ACCT REFUNDS WATER & SEWER FUND REVENUE ,
Supplier 136316 HOUSEHOLD IND FINANCE CO
9.30 REF OVPMT UTIL 167 CHAPARRAL D 141974 5301.4997 WATER/SEWER ACCT REFUNDS WATER & SEWER FUND REVENUE
Supplier 137308 JP MORGAN
123.06 REF OVPMT UTIL 13641 EVERTON A 142559 5301.4997 WATER/SEWER ACCT REFUNDS WATER & SEWER FUND REVENUE
Supplier 137317 BANK OF NY
52.50 REF SKATING LESSON REG FEE 143464 32950 5201.4813 ARENASKATING LESSONS ARENA#1 FUND REVENUES
Supplier 137350 BAKALOV, WANDA OR GEORGE
52.50 REF SKATING LESSON REG FEE 143465 32951 5201.4813 ARENASKATING LESSONS ARENA#1 FUND REVENUES I
Supplier 137350 BAKALOV, WANDA OR GEORGE
52.50 REF SKATING LESSON REG FEE 143466 32971 5201.4813 ARENASKATtNG LESSONS ARENA#1 FUND RE�/GNUES
y
_
i
R55CKREG �vG20000 CITYOFAPF .iLLEY 11/� a5:47:04
Council Check Register Page - 19
10/16/2012 -11/30/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledge Account Description Business Unit
Supplier 137350 BAKALOV, WANDAOR GEORGE
20.00 REF SPEEDWAY RACING FEE (2) 143471 22992 1001.4351 PRE SCHOOL PROGRAMS GENERAL FUND REVENUE
Supplier 137351 RASMUSSEN, KARLAOR CHRIS
27.99 PK JEANS 143626 48298 1710.6281 UNIFORMlCLOTHING ALLOWANCE PARK MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT
Supplier 100505 WACHTER, GARY N
394.04 CMF MOWER 00035196 146924 4056953 1540.6211 SMALLTOOLS & EQUIPMENT CMF BUILDINGS & GROUNDS MNTC
Supplier 118232 JOHN DEERE FINANCIAL
47.67 CMF MOWER BLADES 00035196 146925 4057039 1540.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS CMF BUILDINGS & GROUNDS MNTC
Supplier 118232 JOHN DEERE FINANCIAL
95.94 PK BAR LUBE 00035352 146926 4056692 1765.6212 MOTOR FUELS/01LS PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
Supplier 118232 JOHN DEERE FINANCIAL
39.95 PK LINE 00035352 146927 4056658 1715.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARKATHIETIC FIELD MAINTENANC
Suppiier 118232 JOHN DEERE FINANCIAL ��
9.30- PK CREDIT 00035352 146928 1765.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
Supplier 118232 JOHN DEERE FINANCIAL
179.35 TAX#1 5413 147010 82283100 5015.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
Supplier 100775 BELLBOY CORPORATION BAR SUPPLY
45.03 NOTAX#1 5413 147011 82283100 5015.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES '
Supplier 100775 BELLBOY CORPORATION BAR SUPPLY '
5.05 FREIGHT#1 5413 147012 822831�0 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
Supplier 100775 BELLBOY CORPORATION BAR SUPPLY
33.00 NOTAX#3 5413 147013 82227400 5085.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
Supplier 100775 BELLBOY CORPORATION BAR SUPPLY
4.17 FREIGHT#3 5413 147014 82227400 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES '
Supplier 100775 BELLBOY CORPORATION BAR SUPPLY ',
26.15 TAX#3 5413 147015 82253900 5085.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES �
Supplier 100775 BELIBOY CORPORATION BAR SUPPLY
4.13 FREIGHT#3 5413 147016 82253900 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
Supplier 100775 BELLBOY CORPORATION BAR SUPPLY
19.55 TAX#3 5413 147017 82282900 5085.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
Supplier 100775 BELLBOY CORPORATION BAR SUPPLY
2.09 FREIGHT#3 5413 147018 82282900 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
Supplier 100775 BELLBOY CORPORATION BAR SUPPLY ,
2,264.91
260061 17/28/2012 743479 ACKERMAN, DOUGLAS '
63.75 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217822 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
63.75
250062 11/28/2072 122633 ACKERMAN, JANET LYNN
212.63 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217833 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS '
�
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/29/20125:47:04 I �� !
Council Check Register Pa9e' 20 I
10/16/2012 -11 /30l2012 I
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
3.33 MIIEAGE-ELECTION JUDGE 217834 20121106M 1015.6277 MIIEAGE/AUTOALLOWANCE CITY CLERKIELECTIONS
215.96
250063 17/28/2012 719787 ANDERSON, SUSAN P
170.00 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217918 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
170.00
250064 11/2812012 143755 AUGUSTINE, CANDICE
89.25 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217915 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
89.25
260065 11/28/2012 143510 BAILEY, RANDY CLIFFORD
63.75 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218025 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS �
i
63.75
250066 17/28/2012 140263 BAILEY, RONNIE L II �
140.25 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218041 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERWELECTIONS
140.25 I
250067 11I28I2012 740240 BANHAM, ESTELLA G
63.75 SVC RENDERED-ELECT�ON JUDGE 217835 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
63.75
250068 11I28/2012 743751 BANTA, KATHRIN K
87.13 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217879 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
87.13
250069 71/28/2012 121b27 BAUER, CINDY LYNN
131J5 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 277954 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
131.75
250070 71/28/2012 114102 BAUMANN, RACHEL ANN
129.63 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218005 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS !�
129.63
250071 71/28/2012 113338 BERGEVIN, PAUL E
125.38 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217849 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
125.38 I
250072 11128/2012 140266 BERGSTROM, VIRGINIA G ,
66.00 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217927 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS '
68.00 ?
I
R55CKREG �..G20000 CITYOFAPF. ,LLEY 11P 15:47:04
Council Check Register Page - 21
10/16/2012 -11/30/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledge Account Description Business Unit
250073 11/28/2012 140897 BJERKE, VICKIE
157.25 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217969 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
157.25
260074 11/28/2012 101827 BLAKE, LINDA R
246.50 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218047 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
246.50
250075 17/28/2012 743576 BLANK, JEANNE ANN
140.25 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218040 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERWELECTIONS �
14025
250076 17I28/2012 140909 BOELKE, MARILYN �
136.00 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218026 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
136.00
250077 11/28@012 133991 BOLIN, JUDITH I
157.25 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217944 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
1.67 MILEAGE-ELECTION JUDGE 217945 20121106M 1015.6277 MILEAGE/AUTOALLOWANCE CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
158.92 ,
260078 11/28/2072 143768 BOYER, CLARE
104.13 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218049 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
104.13
250079 11/28/2072 130701 BREAN, KAREN '
153.00 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217900 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
1.11 MILEA(3E-ELECTION JUDGE 217901 20121106M 1015.6277 MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
154.11
250080 11/28/2012 101822 BROMUND, KAREN J I
195.50 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217919 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS I
195.50 I
250081 11I28/2012 740900 BROST, JANETTE A
140.25 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218045 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERKlELECTIONS
140.25 '
250082 71/28/2012 122666 BROWN, JAMES RALPH
127.50 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218069 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
127.50
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/29/201 � 5:47:04
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register Page - 22
I
10/16/2012 -11/30/2012 �
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
250083 11/28/2072 113387 BUECHELE, BRIAN
199.50 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217967 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
2.22 MILEAGE-ELECTION JUDGE 217968 20121106M 1015.6277 MILEAGE/AUTOALLOWANCE CITY CLERWELECTIONS I
201.72 �i�
250084 11128/2012 101825 BURIN, CAMILLE G
131.75 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217917 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
131.75
250085 11/28/2012 133993 BURKE, ANITA
159.38 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217999 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
2.22 MILEAGE-ELECTION JUDGE 218000 20121106M 1015.6277 MILEAGE/AUTOALLOWANCE CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
161.60 I
250086 11/28/2012 107826 BURKE, RONALD S '
204.75 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217965 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERKIELECTIONS
2.22 MILEAGE-ELECTION JUDGE 217966 20121106M 1015.6277 MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
206.97
250087 11/28/2012 143752 BUTLER, CATHLEEN �
159.38 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217880 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
159.38
250088 17/28/2012 101827 CARDEY, LUCETTE
131.75 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217961 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
131.75
250089 11/28/2012 133961 CAUCUTT; RONAID C
148.75 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217934 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
148.75
250090 11/28/2012 743493 COOPER, JENNIFER
131.75 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217905 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
131.75
250091 17/28/2012 719642 DAHM, KAROLYN
155.13 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217863 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
155.13 I
I
250092 17/28/2012 722656 DARK, PAULINE '!
136.00 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218022 20121106 < , 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELEC' ':
RS5CKREG Zu�;20000 CITYOFAPF .LLEY 11/� i5:47:04
Council Check Register Page - 23
10/16/2012 —11/30/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
136.00
250093 11128/2012 109206 DAVIES, RUSSELL
148.75 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218052 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
148.75
250094 11/28/2012 743507 DAVIS, GERALD
129.63 SVC RENDERED-ElECT10N JUDGE 218004 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
129.63 '
250095 71l28/2012 733967 DENNY, DELORES JANE
129.63 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217955 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
129.63
260096 17/28I2012 143508 DETERMAN, MARK
129.63 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218012 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
129.63
250097 11/28/2012 102163 DIRNBERGER, CAMI J
212.63 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 278056 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
212.63
250098 11l28/2012 740242 DITTEL, ROBERT
133.88 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218077 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS i
I
133.88
250099 71/28I2012 143771 DOWELL, JENNIFER A
85.00 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218073 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
85.00
250100 71/28/2012 114112 EBEL, PENNY
131.75 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217912 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
131.75
250701 11/28/2012 143746 ELLENBERG, BOBBI
80.75 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217824 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
8075
250102 17/28/2012 143760 ELVIN, FRANK
153.00 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217960 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
153.00
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/29/201� 5:47:04
Council Check Register Page - 24
10/16/2012 -11/30/2012
Check # Date Amount Suppiier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
250103 17/28/2072 143494 ERICKSON, KURT ,
65.88 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217909 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS I
65.88 I I
250704 71/28/2012 740249 EWING, JERRY LEE �
157.25 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217970 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
157.25
250105 11/2812012 779807 FARBER, JOAN
159.38 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217881 20121106 7015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
159.38
250106 17/28/2012 135217 FELDHAHN, FRANCIS
127.50 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217937 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS I
127.50 I
250107 77/28/2072 114716 FELDT, PHYLLIS I
129.63 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217928 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
129.63
250708 11/28/2012 122906 FESNOG, KAARE
153.00 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217698 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
1.11 MILEAGE-ELECTION JUDGE 217899 20121106M 1015.6277 MILEAGE/AUTOALLOWANCE CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
154.11
250109 71I2812012 719803 FILIPAS, LYNN DIANE
133.88 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218002 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
133.88
250110 77/28/2012 100171 FINGER, JUDY M ,
178.50 SVC RENDERED-ELECT�ON JUDGE 218075 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
178.50
250111 71/28I2012 714119 FINGER, RONNIE R
63.75 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217977 2012'1106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS I
6375 �
250112 71/28/2072 733994 FLANAGAN, MARIAN
133.88 SVC RENOERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217882 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERKlELECTIONS
133.88
250113 17/2� ? 114120 FRY, REBECCA R
R55CKREG �..v20000 CITYOFAPF ,LLEY 11/� d5:47:04
Councii Check Register Page - 25
10/16/2012 -11/30/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
63.75 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217994 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
63.75
250114 11128/2072 119806 FUNDERBURK JR, CHARLES C
127.50 SVC RENDERED-ELECT�ON JUDGE 217939 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERKIELECTIONS
727.50
250115 11/28/2012 133996 GABERT, LANAE i
140.25 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218046 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS '
14025
250116 11128I2012 140892 GEDELMAN, ANNE
133.88 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 277976 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
133.88
250717 11/28/2012 743769 GEHRING, MARIE
85,00 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218058 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
85.00 '
250118 71/28/2�72 134000 GEORGE, JOANN
68.00 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217883 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
68.00
250119 11/28/2012 740248 GERNANDT, ROBIN
131.75 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217975 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
131.75
250120 17/28/2012 135204 GILBERTSON, MURIEL
140.25 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217840 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERWELECTIONS
14U.25
250121 17128/2072 122891 GIST, BARBARA JO
153.00 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217906 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
153.00
2b0122 71128/2012 132281 GLUCK, LORI
133.68 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217864 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
133.88 �
260123 11/28/2012 122897 GOULD, JANA J
155.13 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218078 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
155.13
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/29/20125:47:04
Council Check Register Page - 26
10116/2012 -11/30/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Expianation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledge Account Description Business Unit
250724 71I28/2012 143749 GREENLEE, CAROL L
133.88 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217850 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
133.88
250126 11/28/2012 743761 GREENLEE, JAMES C
148.75 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217963 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
148.75 I
250126 11/28/2072 719812 GROTHE, DORSEY I �
133.88 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217884 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
.56 MILEAGE-ELECTION JUDGE 217885 20121106M 1015.6277 MILEAGElAUTO ALLOWANCE CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
134.44
250127 11/2812012 143770 GRUBB, JUDITH
127.50 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218066 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
127.50
250128 11/28/2072 135218 GUGINO, DAVID
140.25 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218039 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
140.25
250729 17/28/2072 140250 HADDY, KIM S
127.50 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217990 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERKlELECTIONS
127.50
250130 77/28/2012 143501 HALL, MAJKEN
133.88 SVC RENOERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217955 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
133.88
250131 11I28/2012 134005 HALLCOCK, JACKIE
157.25 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217903 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
157.25
250132 11/28/2012 133982 HANSEN, DONALD
172.13 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218050 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
172.13
250733 11/28/2012 103773 HANSON, MICHELIE
127.50 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217985 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
727.50
�\
R55CKREG ��s20000 CITYOFAPF. ;�LEY 11l2 .5:47:04
Council Check Register Page - 27
10/16/2012 -11/30/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledge Account Description Business Unit
250134 11/28/2012 143511 HANSON, PHILIP NEALE
174.25 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218030 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
2.22 MILEAGE-ELECTION JUDGE 218031 20121106M 1015.6277 MILEAGE/AUTOALLOWANCE CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
176.47
25013b 11/28/2012 143766 HARKER, MICHELLE K
157.25 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218024 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
157.25
250136 11/28/2012 101852 HILL, MARY JEANETTE ,
129.63 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218008 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS �
129.63
250137 11/28/2012 734007 HILLIGAN, MURIEL
68.00 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217851 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
68.00 i
250138 11/28/2012 140281 HLAS, NANCY
133.88 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217886 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
133.88
250139 11/28/2012 143617 HOEHNE, DENNIS L '
140.25 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218042 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
140.25 I
250740 11/28/2012 143520 HOEHNE, JOYCE
127.50 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218064 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
127.50
250147 11l28/2012 722681 HOLMES, SUSANNE
161.50 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217852 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
1.39 MILEAGE-ELECTION JUDGE 217853 20121106M 1015.6277 MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
162.89
250142 11/28/2012 733963 HORNE, MERTON A
127.50 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217854 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
127.50
'
250143 11l28i2072 119818 HORNE, PATRICIA H �I
267.75 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218016 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
2.22 MILEAGE-EIECTION JUDGE 218017 20121106M 1015.6277 MILEAGE/AUTOA�LOWANCE CITY CLERKJELECTIONS
269.97
CITY OFAPPLE VALLEY 11/29/201�5:47:04
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register Page - 28
10/16/2012 -11/30/2012 �
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit I
250144 17I28/2012 122657 HUBER, CRAIG
155.13 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217997 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
2.22 MILEAGE-ELECTION JUDGE 217998 20121106M 1015.6277 MtLEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
157.35
250145 11128/2072 143767 HUNT, KRISTI
165.75 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218037 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
165.75
260146 71/28/2012 140264 HUSPENI, JOEL
131.75 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218011 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
131.75
250147 11/28/2012 133948 JACKSON, JUDY
174.25 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217826 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
174.25
250148 11/28/2012 122924 JACOBSON, VIRGIE ANN
63.75 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217991 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
63.75
260149 77/2812012 122903 JARDINE, SHARON L
13 3.88 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217827 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
133.88
250150 11/28/2072 143527 JAWISH, MARY MARGARET ,
63.75 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218072 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERKlELECTIONS
63.75
250151 11128/2012 179821 JENSEN, ARLYS
133.88 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217865 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
133.88
250152 11/28@012 143488 JOHNSON, CORRINE ANN I
123.25 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217855 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERKlELECTIONS
12325 �
I
250163 11/2812012 174129 JOHNS�N, DIANE P
194.25 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217983 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
6.66 MILEAGE-ELECTION JUDGE 217984 20121106M 7015.6277 MILEAGElAUTO ALLOWANCE CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
200.91 `
R55CKREG �.>.d20000 CITYOFAPF +LLEY 11G d5:47:04
Council Check Register Page - 29
10/16/2012 —11/30/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledge Account Description Business Unit
250154 11/28/2012 122888 JOHNSON, GERALDINE
127.50 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217996 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
127.50
I
250155 17128I2012 119823 JOHNSON, JOHN D
129.63 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217964 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
129.63
250156 17/28l2012 743753 JURGENSON, RONALD L '
93.50 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217913 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
93.50 '
250157 11/28/2012 133978 KARAN, AUDETTE R ,
127.50 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217923 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
127.50
250758 77/28/2012 743756 KASTNER, EMILIE JEAN I �
153.00 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217943 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
153.00
250759 11/28/2012 134008 KELLY, MARY JO '
76.50 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217992 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS �
76.50
250760 77/28/2012 140262 KESSLER, JUDITH I I'�
63.75 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217856 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS l
6375 I
250761 17/28/2072 143747 KIEFFER, SUSAN
161.50 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217836 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CIN CLERK/ELECTIONS
161.50
250162 11/28/2012 173257 KUNGER, RAE LYNN ,
127.50 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217989 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS '
127.50 �I
I
250763 11/28/2012 122669 KOORS, PATRICIA
133.88 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217887 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
133.88 I
I
250164 11/28/2012 719647 KREMER, FRANCIS PAUL '
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OFAPPLE VALLEY 11/29/201�5:47:04
Council Check Register Page - 30
10/16/2012 -11/30/2012 I
I
Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
123.25 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217857 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
123.25
250165 77/28/2072 114132 KRIEGL, PATRICIA K
194.25 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218059 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
2.22 MILEAGE-ELECTION JUDGE 218060 20121106M 1015.6277 MILEAGE/AUTOALLOWANCE CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
196.47
250166 11/28/2012 143490 KURUD, DAVID
74.38 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217866 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
74.38
250167 11/28/2012 119835 LANT2,MARYANNE
611.63 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217930 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
3.33 MILEAGE-ELECTION JUDGE 217931 20121106M 1015.6277 MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS I
614.96
250168 11/28/2072 113337 LAWRENCE, LLOYD J I I
161.50 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217837 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS I
161.50
250169 17/28@012 722663 LEICK, MICHAEL S '
212.63 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218055 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
212.63
I
250770 17/2812012 101866 LEMKE, DARLENE '
204.75 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218035 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
8.33 MILEAGE-ELECTION JUDGE 218036 20121106M 1015.6277 MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE CITY C�ERK/ELECTIONS
213.08
250171 1112812012 122898 LENERTZ, ERNEST EDWARD
127.50 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217938 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS I
127.50
I
250172 77/28/2072 1437b0 LOBASH, CHRISTOPHER ��
155.13 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217867 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS I
155.13 l
250173 11/28/2072 143512 LONG, MONICA
136.00 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218027 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
136.00
R55CKREG Lv�i20000 CITY OF APP. ,, ,.<LLEY 11/2 :5:47:04
Council Check Register Page - 31
10/16/2012 -11/30/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledge Account Description Business Unit
250174 11/28/2012 143745 LUEBKE, KARA
17.00 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218074 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
17.00
250175 11128/2012 701605 MADIGAN, JUDITH A I
163.63 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217950 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
1.67 MILEAGE-ELECTION JUDGE 217951 20121106M 1015.6277 MILEAGE/AUTOALLOWANCE CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
165.30 I
250776 11I28/2012 119836 MAHON, BRIAN '
160.13 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217846 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS ,
160.13
250177 11/28/2012 122637 MARBLE, ALAN J �
131.75 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217868 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CIERK/ELECTIONS
.56 MILEAGE-ELECTION JUDGE 217869 20121106M 1075.6277 MILEAGElAUTOALLOWANCE CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
132.31
250778 17/28l2072 114135 MATHEWSON, DANA
80.75 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217888 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
80.75
250179 11/28/2012 107870 MCDONALD, CYNTHIA J
161.50 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217952 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
1.67 MILEAGE-ELECTION JUDGE 217953 20121106M 1015.6277 MILEAGE/AUTOALLOWANCE CITY CLERWELECTIONS
163.17
250180 11/2812012 119838 MCKNIGHT, GLADYS
148.75 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218051 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
148J5 ,
250181 11/28/2012 119839 MCKNIGHT, TERRY W '
123.25 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218070 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERWELECTIONS
123.25
250182 17/28I2012 722919 MCLUCAS III, CHARLES F I
133.88 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217889 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
133.88
250183 77128/2012 143502 MCLUCAS IV, CHARLES FRANCIS �
133.88 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217974 20121106 1015.6236 ' ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERWELECTIONS '
133.88
II
CITY OFAPPLE VALLEY 11/29/201�5:47:04
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register Page - 32
10/16/2012 -11/30/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Expianation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledge Account Description Business Unit �
250184 11/28/2012 143484 MEHL, DAREN
140.25 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217838 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
140.25
250185 11I28/2012 114106 MENYA, SHANNAN I
207.38 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217839 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS ,
207.38
250186 11128/2012 174139 MIDDLECAMP, JILL IOUREY
204.75 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217870 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
5.55 MILEAGE-ELECTION JUDGE 217871 20121106M 1015.6277 MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE CITY CLERKlELECTIONS '
210.30
250187 71128/2012 1437b9 MILLER, CATHY ANN
102.00 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217949 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
102.00
250188 11/28/2012 722665 MILLER, JAN SUE
174.25 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218053 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
174.25
250189 71/28/2072 174140 MILLER, JOYCE E
123.25 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217924 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS I
123.25 I
250190 11/28/2012 128275 MORGAN, JEREMY I '
189.00 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217981 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
6.66 MILEAGE-ELECTION JUDGE 217982 20121106M 1015.6277 MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
195.66
250191 11/28I2012 114141 MORROW, RUTH
131.75 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217911 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS I
131.75 I
250192 11/28/2012 143481 MOYER, KRISTEN ROSDAHL
144.50 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217828 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTiON JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
144.50
250193 11/2812012 101875 MUELLER, MARY KATHRYN
133.88 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217973 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS I
133.88 I
i
�
R55CKREG �v�20000 CITYOFAPF �LLEY 11/< a5:47:04
Council Check Register Page - 33
10/16/2012 -11/30l2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledge Account Description Business Unit
250194 11/28/2012 740255 NELSEN, MARY
140.25 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218038 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS '
140.25
250795 11/28/2012 119843 NELSON, ANTHONY I
220.50 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217818 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
1.11 MILEAGE-ELECTION JUDGE 217819 20121106M 1015.6277 MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE CITY CLERWELECTIONS ,
221.61 ��
250196 11/28/2012 143522 NELSON, MARGERY '
123.25 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217858 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
123.25 ,
i
250197 17128/2012 701880 NELSON, SANDRA J
133.88 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217872 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
133.88
250198 11/28/2012 114144 NEUMAN, COREY
223.13 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217932 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
3.33 MILEAGE-ELECTION JUDGE 217933 20121106M 1015.6277 MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS ',
226.46 '
260199 11/28I2012 119404 NEUMEG, ELIZABETH
189.13 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218054 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
189.13
2b0200 11128/2012 143491 NEUMEG, RICHARD W �
133.88 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217873 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
133.88 ,
250201 11/28/2012 122904 NOLTE-REED, MONICA
131.75 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217959 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERIVELECTIONS ',
131.75
250202 11/28/2012 101882 NYBERG, GLORIA J I
131.75 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217907 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
131.75
250203 11/28/2012 140256 NYGAARD, SHARON D I
129.63 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218057 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
129.63
C ITY OF APP LE VALLEY 11 /29/201 � 5:47:04
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register Page - 34
10l16/2012 -11/30/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledge Account Description Business Unit
250204 11/28/2012 113383 O'BRIEN, TRACY K
199.50 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218061 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
2.22 MIIEAGE-ELECTION JUDGE 218062 20121106M 1015.6277 MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
201.72
260205 11/28/2012 119845 OCEL, MARY C
170.00 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217920 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CIERK/ELECTIONS
170.00
250206 11/28/2072 143757 ODLAND, JAMES M
178.50 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217946 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/E�ECTIONS
1.67 MILEAGE-ELECTION JUDGE 217947 20121106M 1015.6277 MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
180.17
250207 11/28/2012 707889 O'NEILL, JANE
129.63 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217957 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
129.63
250208 11I28/2012 122651 O'NEILL, SHELLEY
148.75 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217940 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
148.75
250209 11/28/2012 143764 OSELL, FAYETTA
210.38 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218013 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS I
270.38 ��
250210 11/2812012 703193 OWEN, NAOMI
170.00 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217921 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
170.00
250211 11/28/2011 114147 PAL-FREEMAN, CAROLYN LEE
270.38 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218014 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS ,
2.22 MIIEAGE-ELECTION JUDGE 218015 20121106 1015.6277 MILEAGE/AUTOALLOWANCE CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
272.60
250272 77/2812012 143485 PANKUCH, LEONARD E
129.63 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217841 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
129.63
250213 71/28/2012 735202 PARISH, LINDA J
123.25 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218009 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECT ,
_. _..
I
RSSCKREG ' ._ .�20000 CITYOFAPP. �LLEY 11/� �5:47:04
Council Check Register Page - 35
10/16/2012 -11/30l2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledge Account Description Business Unit
123.25
250214 11128/2012 122927 PARSONS, CHRISTINE
148.75 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218063 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
148.75
250215 11128/2012 113389 PASEKA, LINDA L
199.75 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217922 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
199.75
250216 11/28/2072 140902 PATES, ANN C
119.00 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217993 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
119.00
250217 11/28/2012 743766 PAULSON, JEANNE7TE
97.75 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218023 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
97.75
250218 11/28/2012 143489 PERRAULT, MARY
161.50 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217859 2�121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERWELECTIONS
1.39 MILEAGE-ELECTION JUDGE 217860 20121106M 1015.6277 MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
162.89
250219 11/28/2012 140897 PETER, MARTIN
89.25 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218001 20121106 7015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
89.25
250220 11I28/2012 133977 PLACEWAY, STEPHEN
207.38 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217874 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERWELECTIONS
5.55 MILEAGE-ELECTION JUDGE 217875 20121106M 1015.6277 MILEAGE/AUTOALLOWANCE CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
212.93
250221 17I28/2012 133976 POLANSKY, DAVID
150.88 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218003 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
150.88 ,
250222 11/28/2012 113370 POLUM, PATRICIA T
89.25 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217972 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
8925
250223 11/28I2012 134018 POOL, ARLYSS '
148.75 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217936 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
RS5CKREG LOG20000 CITYOFAPPLEVALLEY 11/29/201�5:47:04
Cou�cil Check Register Page - 36
10/16/2012 -11l30/2012
Check # Date Amount Suppiier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledge Account Description Business Unit
148.75
250224 11/28/2012 7339T5 POOL, DOUGLAS V
150.88 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218006 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
150.88
250225 17128/2012 143509 PORTER, SANDRA LEE
123.25 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218010 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
123.25
2b0226 11/28/2012 135223 PORTER, WARREN
63.75 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218068 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
63.75
260227 11/28/2012 719849 PROEPPER, MARY
93.50 SVC RENDERED-EIECTION JUDGE 218020 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
93.50
250228 17/28/2012 122885 PUNG, SANDRA
133.88 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217829 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
133.88
260229 11I28/2012 101894 QUAST, NANCY K
63. 75 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217908 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
63.75
250230 11/28/2072 122648 QUINN, CHARLES P
131.75 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217890 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
131.75
250231 17/28/2012 135193 REICHERT, CATHERINE A
221.00 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218048 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CIERKIELECTIONS
221.00
250232 11/28/2072 143762 REISINGER, DEBORAH
148.75 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217995 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
148.75
250233 11I28@012 140247 REISINGER, PATRICK EDWARD I
59.50 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217978 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
59.50
R55CKREG �LuG20000 CITYOFAPF. ,LLEY 11l� l5:47:04
Council Check Register Page - 37
10/16/2012 -11/30/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledge Account Description Business Unit
2b0234 1112SI2012 113335 REPPE, SPENCER
159.38 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217891 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
159.38
250235 11/28@012 743763 RESSEMAN, RICHARD
153.00 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218007 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
153.00
250236 71/28l2012 140241 REXTRAW, JAMES L
89.25 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217842 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERWELECTIONS
89.25
250237 11/28/2072 714152 RICHARDSON, DIANNE V
127.50 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218065 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
127.50
250238 17/28/2012 140265 RIEDELL, PATRICIA CURRIE
133.88 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217876 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
133.88 �
250239 77/28/2012 140888 ROBERSON, MARY
170.00 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217929 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
170.00
250240 17128/2012 135203 ROIGER, SUSAN '
140.25 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218044 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
140.25
250241 71/28/2012 143483 ROSE, MICHAEL W
131.75 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217830 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
131.75
250242 11128/2072 133983 ROWLEY, PHYLLIS ANN
155.13 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217892 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERKlELECTIONS
1.11 MILEAGE-ELECTION JUDGE 217893 20121106M 1015.6277 MILEAGE/AUTOALLOWANCE CITY CLERWELECTIONS
156.24
250243 77/28/2012 100415 RUSSELL, RICHARD W
225.75 SVC RENDERED-ELECT�ON JUDGE 217820 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
4.44 MILEAGE-ELECTION JUDGE 218076 20121106M 1015.6277 MILEAGE/AUTOALLOWANCE CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
230.19 '
I
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/29/201 � 5:47:04
Council Check Register Page - 38
10/16/2012 -11/30/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
2b0244 11/28/2012 134024 RUSSELL, ROBERT
157.25 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218021 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
157.25
250245 71I2812012 143486 SAGSTETTER, THOMAS
140.25 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217843 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
140.25
250246 11/28/2012 133953 SALISBURY, BETTY LUE
123.25 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217861 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS I
123.25
250247 71/28/2012 143496 SAMPERS, SHELLY
51.00 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217916 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/EIECTIONS
51.00
250248 17/28/2012 122632 SANDEY, DARLENE JANICE
70.13 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217831 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
70.13
250249 11/2812012 119853 SAVANICK, GEORGE A
228.38 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217847 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
11.10 MILEAGE-ELECTION JUDGE 217848 20121106M 1015.6277 MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
239.48
250260 77/2812072 140252 SCAVIO, JAMES
127.50 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217988 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
127,50
2b0251 11/28/2072 133986 SCHERB,SANDRAJ
129.63 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 277962 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
129.63
250252 11/28/2072 722907 SCHLEPPENBACH, KEVIN M
133.88 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217956 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
133.88
250253 . 71/2812072 143492 SCHROEPFER, SHARYN
133.88 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217894 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
133.88
250254 11/2A" 713364 SCHWARTZ, MARILYN
i
RSSCKREG ��G20000 CITYOFAPF. ,�LLEY 11/� a5:47:04
Council Check Register Page - 39
10/16/2012 -11/30/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
150.88 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217986 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
150.88
250255 11/28I2012 113373 SEGLEM, KAREN
119.00 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217979 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
119.00
250256 11/28/2012 122658 SEJBA, BONNIE K
136.00 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218019 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
136.00 I
250257 71/28/2012 140279 SHAVER, CONNIE
119.00 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217832 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
119.00
250268 17/28/2012 1437b8 SHAW, TRAVIS KYLE I
76.50 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217948 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
76.50 '
250259 11/28/2012 102693 SHEPHERD, THERESA
89.25 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217904 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
89.25
250260 71/28/2012 114156 SHULTS, MEIiNDA W I
89.25 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218032 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS I
89.25 �
I
I
250261 11/28/2012 140886 SIEVE, JUDITH
133.88 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217877 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
133.88
250262 71/28/2012 119858 SLOVAK, JACQUELINE ANN
133.88 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217895 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
133.88
250263 11l28/2072 722636 SMALEC, CATHY L
142.36 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217844 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS i
142.38
250264 11I28/2012 114159 SPYCHALLA, WILLIAM
131.75 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217902 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS ,
131.75 I
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/29/20125:47:04
RSSCKREG LOG20000 I
Councii Check Register Page - 40
10/16/2012 -11l30/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv Na Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
250265 11/28/2012 134029 STEEVES, AMY
129.63 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218067 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
129.63
260266 11I28/2012 143754 STEVENS, LOIS A
85.00 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217914 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
85.00
250267 11/28/2012 779860 STEWARDSON, PEGGIE
102.00 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217845 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
102.00
260268 11/28/2012 140893 STRICKER, ROY DOUGLAS
129.63 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217926 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
129.63
250269 71/28/2012 143518 STUDT, KAREN I,
140.25 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218043 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/E�ECTIONS
14025
250270 11/28/2012 102208 SVENDAHL, ROSANN
172.13 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218028 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
2.22 MILEAGE-ELECTION JUDGE 218029 20121106M 1015.6277 MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
174.35
250271 1712812012 743500 TARRO, DANIEL J
114.75 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217941 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
114.75
250272 17/28/2012 143603 TASLER, STEVEN
131.75 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217971 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS �,
131.75
250273 11/28/2012 143497 TAVERNA, CAITLIN
116.88 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217925 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
116.88
250274 11/28/2012 743504 TERAVSKIS, PETER J
61.63 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218071 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
61.63
R55CKREG �..�20000 CITYOFAPF .LLEY 11/. �5:47:04
Council Check Register Page - 41
10/16/2012 -11/30/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledge Account Description Business Unit
250275 71/28/2012 140885 TICHY, CHARLES F
133.88 SVC REN�ERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217878 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
133.88
250276 77/28/2012 140890 TINDELI, CHARLES E
127.50 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217935 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
127.50
250277 11/28/2072 701908 TUFTE, RHONDA
199.50 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218033 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
2.22 MILEAGE-ELECTION JUDGE 218034 20121106M 1015.6277 MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
201.72
250278 11/28/2072 143505 VAN GORDON, STEPHEN J
127.50 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217987 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS ',
127.50 I
250279 11/28/2012 713355 VEGA, BARBARA '
153.00 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217980 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS �
153.00
250280 11/28/2012 140257 VORACHEK, KELLY ',
157.25 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217896 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS I
1.11 MILEAGE-ELECTIONJUDGE 217897 20121106M 1015.6277 MILEAGE/AUTOALLOWANCE CITYCLERK/ELECTIONS �i
158.36
250281 71/28I2012 135191 WESSMAN, DEBORAH JOY
187.00 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 277862 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERKIELECTIONS I
187.00
I
250282 11/2812012 134035 WILSON, STEVEN I
144.50 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217942 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS ,
144.50 I
250283 11/28/2072 718944 ZACK, PATRICIA R i
153.00 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 217910 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS I
153.00
250284 17128/2072 134036 ZURALES, DEBRA �
161.50 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218018 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS GTY CLERK/ELECTIONS I
161.50
iI
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/29l201 � 5:47:04
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register Page - 42
10/16/2012 —11/30/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Expl anation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
20121041 10M6/2072 120679 U S BANK P CARD
84.60 1ST/10TH TEE BAR 00068795 217240 5120.6420 GOLF-FOOD GOLF KITCHEN
Supplier 141970 1STAND 10TH TEE ENERGY
30.72 TEEN CENTER BOOKS 00070112 217241 1840.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REC TEEN PROGRAMS
Supplier 140339 AMAZON.COM I
�,gg_ 00070112 217241 1000.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
Supplier 140339 AMAZON.COM I
Supplier 140339 AMAZON.COM
102.33 ANKLE WEIGHTS 00070406 217242 1330.6211 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT FIRE OPERATIONS I
Supplier 140339 AMAZON.COM I
6.58- 00070406 217242 1000.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET I
Supplier 140339 AMAZON.COM �
Supplier 140339 AMAZON.COM
13.78 EYE WASH SIGN 00070406 217243 1340.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE BLDG 8 GROUNDS MNTC ',
Supplier 140339 AMAZON.COM �I
,gg_ 00070406 217243 1000.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
Supplier 140339 AMAZON.COM
Supplier 140339 AMAZON.COM i
131.02- WINE-LADIES LEAGUE 00070256 217244 5120.6430 GOLF-WINE GOLF KITCHEN I
Supplier 137805 APPLE VALLEY LIQUOR
346.29 MNGFOACONF-BROUGHTEN 217245 1035.6276 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXPOTHERFINANCE I
Supplier 103257 ARROWINOOD
211.62 APAACONF-LOVELACE 217246 1100.6276 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP OTHERDEV MANAGEMENT
Supplier 103257 ARROWINOOD '
211.62 APAACONF-BODMER 217247 1100.6276 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP OTHERDEV MANAGEMENT
Supplier 103257 ARROVWVOOD
211.62 APAA CONF-DYKES 217248 1100.6276 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP OTHERDEV MANAGEMENT
Supplier 103257 ARROWINOOD !
292.73 RETIREMENT PHOTO FRAMINGS 00058642 217249 1200.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE MANAGEMENT ,
Supplier 141215 ERICKSON'S BEN FRANKLW I � i
321.34 DIGITAL CAMERAS-INVESTIGATION800675 217250 1215.6211 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT POLICE DETECTIVE UNIT
Supplier 113057 BEST BUY
61.46 INTERVIEW PANEL LUNCH 00066697 217251 1200.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE MANAGEMENT I
Supplier 101471 BUFFALO WILD WINGS GRILL & BAR '
95.71 4 IN GLOW STICKS 00070352 217252 1275.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES POL COMMUN OUTREACH/CRIME PREV ,
Supp�ier 143772 COOL GLOW
6.16- 00070352 217252 100D2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
Supplier 143772 COOL GLOW ,
Supplier 143772 COOL GLOW '
254.36 MRPA CONF-PADGETT 217253 1705.6276 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP OTHERPARK & RECREATION MGMT TRAING
Supplier 102289 CRAGUNS CONFERENCE CENTER
R55CKREG Luv20000 CITYOFAPF_, .;LLEY 11!'� d5:47:04
Council Check Register Page - 43
10/16/2012 -11/30/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledge Account Description Busin Unit
235.90 MRPA CONF-SKINNER 217254 1705.6276 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP OTHERPARK & RECREATION MGMT TRAING
Supplier 102289 CRAGUNS CONFERENCE CENTER
160.54 VOTER ACCESS SIGNS 00068621 217255 1015.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
Supplier 103500 CARROT-TOP INDUSTRIES
10.33- 00068621 217255 10002330 DUE TO aTHER GOVERNMENT GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET ,
Supplier 103500 CARROT-TOP INDUSTRIES '�
Supplier 103500 CARROT-TOP INDUSTRIES
27.99 RETIREMENT SUPPLIES 00070407 217256 1300.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE MANAGEMENT '
Supplier 100114 CUB FOODS
47.92 RETIREMENT SUPPLIES 00070407 217257 1300.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE MANAGEMENT
Supplier 100114 CUB FOODS
8.68 APPLES CLUB SUPPLIES 00069585 217258 1845.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REC SELF SUPPORT PROG GENERAL
Suppiier 100114 CUB FOODS
7.82 PUNCH-RETIREMENT PARTY 00058640 217259 1200.6399 OTHER CHARGES POLICE MANAGEMENT
Supplier 100114 CUB FOODS
28.28 ADAPTED TEEN DANCE 00070118 217260 1845.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REC SELF SUPPORT PROG GENERAL
Supplier 100114 CUB FOODS
56.98 TOTS PROGRAM SUPPLIES 00070118 217261 1875.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REC PRESCHOOL PROGRAMS �
Supplier 100114 CUB FOODS
349.60 NLC CONF-HAMMON-ROLAND 217262 1005.6276 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP OTHERMAYOR/CITY COUNCIL
Supplier 123029 DELTAAIR
10.71 RETIREMENT SUPPLIES 00070408 217263 1300.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE MANAGEMENT
Supplier 120473 DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC. '
34.21 CLUBHOUSE SUPPLIES-MISC 00066516 217264 5120.6422 GOLF-KITCHEN SUPPLIES GOLF KITCHEN i
Supplier 120473 DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC.
148.91 RECRUIT OPEN HOUSE 217265 1200.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE MANAGEMENT '
Supplier 122077 ERBERT & GERBERTS SUBS i
182.97 TRAFFIC/CRIM CODE BOOKS-2013 00066694 217266 1200.6239 PRINTING POLICE MANAGEMENT I
Supplier 143773 FEDEX OFFICE I
884.00 SCBA MASK W/ PROTECTIVE LINING 217267 1330.6211 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT FIRE OPERATIONS �I�
I
Suppiier 100190 GALLS INC
11.23 RIBBON 00062440 217268 1700.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK & RECREATION MANAGEMENT
Supplier 102929 JO-ANN FABRICS & CRAFTS
686.75 FRAME FIRE CODE OF ETHICS 217269 1300.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE MANAGEMENT
Supplier 102929 JO-ANN FABRICS & CRAFTS
18.41 COLOR INVITATIONS 00069389 217270 1200.6239 PRINTING POLICE MANAGEMENT
Supplier 132646 KWIK KOPY BUSINESS SO�UTIONS
31.46 BIRCH CABINET TRIM 00068347 217271 1540.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES CMF BUILDINGS & GROUNDS MNTC
Supplier 100278 LAMPERTS
426.43 LANYARDS-YOUTH SKATING LESSC0�69273 217272 5205.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA 1 MANAGEMENT I
Supplier 143775 CUSTOM LANYARDS PLUS I � i
I
I
I
I
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/29l20125:47:04 �
R55CKREG LOG20000 �
Council Check Register Page - 44 I
10/16/2012 -11/30/2012 �
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit I
27.43- 00069273 217272 5200.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT ARENA FUND BALANCE SHEET ,
Supplier 143775 CUSTOM LANYARDS PLUS
Supplier 143775 CUSTOM IANYARDS PLUS I
171.68 BREAKAWAY VESTS 00070405 217273 1330.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE FIRE OPERATIONS
Supplier 143774 LEGEND DATA SYSTEMS INC
37.48 GLASS PUNCH BOWL 00066518 277274 5120.6422 GOLF-KITCHEN SUPPLIES GOLF KITCHEN ',
Supplier 123096 MACYS
45.32 SUPPLIES-GENERAL 00070113 217275 1840.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REC TEEN PROGRAMS
Supplier 100309 MENARDS '
114.58 CORD/POWER STRIP/HANDCART 00069275 217276 5210.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA 1 BUILDING MAINTENANCE
Supplier 100362 NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMENT
2.76 RETIREMENT SUPPLIES 217277 1300.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE MANAGEMENT
Supplier 102259 PDQ FOOD STORES, INC. �
1,595.00 WINDOWS CONNECTION-GEORGE 217278 1030.6276 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP OTHERINFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
Supplier 143776 DEVCONNECTIONS '
13.32 PUNCH SUPPLIES-CLUBHOUSE 00066517 217279 5120.6421 GOLF-NON AICOHOLIC BEVERAGES GOLF KITCHEN
Supplier 107839 RAINBOW INC
78.10 INTERVIEW PANEL LUNCH 00066695 217280 1200.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE MANAGEMENT
Supplier 116267 RUBY TUESDAY
359.11 GOURD CANDLE CLASS MOLD MISm0069586 217281 1845.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REC SELF SUPPORT PROG GENERAL
Supplier 142417 SMOOTH ON
2�,p�_ 00069586 217281 7000.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
Supplier 142417 SMOOTH ON
Supplier 142417 SMOOTH ON
133.04 WINDOW REGULATOR/SCREWS 00069182 217282 1350.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS FIRE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
Supplier 125218 SPARTAN CHASSIS
450.46 KIT-ABTS RED SEATBELT 217283 1350.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS FIRE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
Supplier 125218 SPARTAN CHASSIS �
� 19 _ 2�72g3 1000.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
Supplier 125218 SPARTAN CHASSIS '
Suppiier 125218 SPARTAN CHASSIS
13.92 CLEAN UP DAY SUPPLIES 00070303 217284 1100.6240 CLEANING SERV�CE/GARBAGE REMOVDEV MANAGEMENT
Supplier 100463 TARGET STORES
82.34 12 PKS COKE 00069453 217285 1060.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE MUNICIPAL BLDG & GROUNDS MNTC !
Supplier 100463 TARGET STORES �,
46.02 PLANO STORAGE SYSTEM 00069512 217286 1210.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE FIELD OPERATIONS/PATROL i
Supplier 102101 WAL-MART
85.57 3 VIDEO GAMES 00070114 217287 1840.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REC TEEN PROGRAMS
Supplier 102101 WAL-MART
51.51 VARIOUS EVENT SUPPLIES 00070115 217288 1840.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REC TEEN PROGRAMS
Supplier 102101 WAL-MART
RS5CKREG �.>i�20000 CITYOFAPF .LLEY 11!'� l5:47:04
Council Check Register Page - 45
10/16/2012 -11/30/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
8,670.59
20121042 10/30/2012 720679 U S BANK P CARD
q5.00 YOUTH WORK CONF-PADGETT 217289 1705.6275 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL PARK & RECREATION MGMT TRAING
Supplier 100492 UNIVERS�TY OF MINNESOTA
246.63 TOILET SEAT COVER DISPENSERS 00068790 217290 5190.6229 2011137G GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF CLUBHOUSE CONSTRUCTION
Supplier 140185 AIR DELIGHTS
15.86- 00068790 217290 5100.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT GOLF FUND BALANCE SHEET
Supplier 140185 AIR DELIGHTS
Supplier 140185 AIR DELIGHTS �
182.36 SPEEDO CLUSTER 00069185 217291 1520.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS NATURAL RESOURCES
Suppiier 125212 AJR MINNEAPOLIS
50.31 AUTUMN GENL SUPPLIES 00066519 217292 5110.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF CLUBHOUSE BUILDING
Supplier 100049 BACHMAN'S
243.15 BOOK-STRENGTHS FINDER 2.0 00046407 217293 1200.6399 OTHER CHARGES POLICE MANAGEMENT
Supplier 100048 BARNES 8 NOBLE
10.50 RETURN MERCHANDISE 00066483 217294 5115.6424 GOLf FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE GOLF PRO SHOP
Supplier 134891 MAIL N PARCEL
393.63 SUPPLIES-VARIOUS 00069513 217295 1210.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE FIELD OPERATIONS/PATROL �
Supplier 101270 BROWNELLS INC '
222.88 WINDOWS CONNECTION-GEORGE 217296 1030.6276 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP OTHERINFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
Supplier 127930 BELLAGIO HOTEL
139.61 STOMP WORKBOOTS 00069187 217297 1530.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE CMF SHOP EQUIP MNTC 8 REPAIR
Suppiier 137449 COASTAL BOOT INC
6.75 GOURDS-CANDLE CLASS 00069587 217298 1845.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REC SELF SUPPORT PROG GENERAL
Supplier 100114 CUB FOODS
74.52 LIL CHEFS 2 SUPPLIES 00070119 217299 • 1875.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REC PRESCHOOL PROCRAMS
Supplier 100114 CUB FOODS
99.50 IT SOLUTIONS ONLINE SUBSCRIPTI00069809 217300 1030.6280 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY '�
Supplier 121349 EXPERTS EXCHANGE LLC �
239.00 FLATANALOG SPEEDO REPAIR 00069190 217301 1210.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT POUCE FIELD OPERATIONS/PATROL I
Supplier 141688 D 8� D INSTRUMENTS �I
369.60 WINDOWS CONNECTION-GEORGE 217302 1030.6276 SCHOOLSlCONFERENCES/EXP OTHERINFORMATION TECHNOLOGY l
Supplier 127947 SUN COUNTRY I
25.00 MN SECTION MEETING-FALL 00068796 217303 5105.6275 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCESlEXP LOCAL GOLF MANAGEMENT
Supplier 101515 MN PGA
152.01 FIRE PREVENTION OPEN HOUSE PI�070411 217304 1300.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE MANAGEMENT
Supplier 100146 DOMINO'S PIZZA ,
50.04 FIRE PREVENTION OPEN HOUSE PIg0070418 217305 1300.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE MANAGEMENT ',
Supplier 100146 DOMINO'S PIZZA
164.13 COUNTERTOP TOWEL DISPENSER 00068791 217306 5190.6229 2011137G GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF CLUBHOUSE CONSTRUCTION
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/29/20125:47:04
Council Check Register Page - 46
10/16/2012 -11/30/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subiedge Account Description Business Unit
Supplier 120784 ULINE
45.21 MELTER-GOURD CLASS 00069588 217307 1845.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REC SELF SUPPORT PROG GENERAL
Supplier 140339 AMAZON.COM
p,g�_ 00069588 277307 1000.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
Supplier 140339 AMAZON.COM I
Supplier 140339 AMAZON.COM
6.43 GOURD CLASS SUPPLIES 00069589 217308 1645.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REC SELF SUPPORT PROG GENERAL l i
Supplier 120473 DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC.
95.23 PLANNER/REFILL-MAYOR 00064948 217309 1005.6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES MAYOR/CITY COUNCIL
Supplier 103259 FRANKLIN COVEY
46.87 CLERK COOKIES 217310 1015.6399 OTHER CHARGES CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS I
Supplier 107839 RAINBOW INC I
15.00 IT SUBSCRIPTION-OCT 217311 1030.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
Supplier 141272 MAILCHIMP
139.00 PAINT SPRAYER 00069282 217312 5210.6211 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT ARENA 1 BUILDING MAINTENANCE
Supplier 100309 MENARDS ��
52.00 TAPE/SUPPLIES 00069282 217313 5210.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA 1 BUILDING MAINTENANCE ,
Supplier 100309 MENARDS I
38.55 MARKERS-PLANNER PRESENTATI0018�69407 217314 1100.6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES DEV MANAGEMENT
Supplier 142133 BLICKARTMATERIALS
44.00 MEMBERSHIP-C. RUSSELL 00070416 217315 1300.6280 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FIRE MANAGEMENT
Supplier 124239 MSFCA
220.00 PHINEAS & FERB LIVE! TICKETS 00042196 217316 1001.5340 REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS GENERAL FUND REVENUE
Supplier 100363 XCEL ENERGY
77.13 OPEN HOUSE FOOD 00070412 217317 1300.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE MANAGEMENT
Supplier 101368 PAPAJOHNS PIZZA
105.32 HALLOWEEN EVENT SUPPLIES 00070122 217318 1845.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REC SELF SUPPORT PROG GENERAL
Supplier 100114 CUB FOODS I
38.16 HALLOWEEN SUPPLIES/TABLE COV�D70123 217319 1845.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REC SELF SUPPORT PROG GENERAL i
Suppiier 102901 PARTY CITY �
34.27 PROPANE FORKLIFT 00069283 217320 5215.6212 MOTOR FUELS/OILS ARENA 1 EQUIPMENT MAWTENANCE
Supplier 139989 PAUL'S CEDAR AVE TIRE & AUTO
76.OD HOSTAGE NEGOT SHIRTS 00070453 217321 1200.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE MANAGEMENT
Supptier 116502 SUNDANTZ CREATIONS 2007
91.07 ELECTRICAL BOXES/SIMTCHES 00069278 217322 5210.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA 1 BUILDING MAINTENANCE
Supplier 143525 HOME DEPOT STORE #2833 l
110.56 FOOTJOY SHOES RETURNED 00066480 217323 5115.6424 GOLF FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE GOLF PRO SHOP I,
Supplier 140516 UPS STORE, THE
191.31 FINGER PULSE ONYX VANTAG 00070415 217324 1330.6211 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT FIRE OPERATIONS
Supplier 142165 TURNER MEDfCAL CO
�2_3�_ 00070415 217324 1000.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT GENERAL FUND BAl �NCE SHEET
R55CKREG ���;20000 CITYOFAPF �LLEY 11L �5:47:04
Council Check Register Page - 47
10/16/2012 --11/30/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledge Account Descript Business U nit
Supplier 142165 TURNER MEDICAL CO
Supplier 142165 TURNER MEDICAL CO
87.66 VACUUM PARTS 00069212 217325 1900.6211 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT AV COMMUNITY CENTER
Supplier 142198 HOME PRO VACUUM
5.64- 00069212 217325 1000.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
Supplier 142198 HOME PRO VACUUM
Suppiier 142198 HOME PRO VACUUM
36.06 FOOD/SUPPLIES 00069399 217326 1200.6275 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL POLICE MANAGEMENT
Supplier 102101 WAL-MART
71.07 HALLOWEEN SUPPLIES 00070120 217327 1875.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REC PRESCHOOL PROGRAMS
Supplier 102101 WAL-MART
35.26 (2) MOVIES 00070120 217328 1840.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REC TEEN PROGRAMS
Supplier 102101 WAL-MART
81.35 KOSS NOISE ISOLATING EARPHON�9066698 217329 1205.6211 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT POLICE RECORDS UNIT
Supplier 102101 WAL-MART
13.88 SCREEN PROTECTOR-PHONES 00068961 217330 1700.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK & RECREATION MANAGEMENT
Supplier 102701 WAL-MART
29.95 IT SUBSCRIPTION OCT 217331 1030.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
Supplier 139978 WUFOO.COM
4,45924
20721138 71/27/2072 120679 U S BANK P CARD I
84.00 AED PADS 00070551 217649 1900.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES AV COMMUNITY CENTER
Supplier 126475 AED SUPERSTORE
275.00 AED BATTERY 00070551 217650 1900.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS AV COMMUNITY CENTER
Supplier 126475 AED SUPERSTORE
107.00 AED PADS/BATTERY 00070555 217651 5110.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF CLUBHOUSE BUILDING
Supplier 126475 AED SUPERSTORE
143.88 HAND SOAP REFILLS 00068797 217652 5115.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF PRO SHOP l
Supplier 140185 AIR DELIGHTS �
175.96 AUTO SOAP DISPENSER 00068797 217653 5190.6229 2011137G GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF CLUBHOUSE CONSTRUCTION
Supplier 140185 AIR DELIGHTS
8.95 SOAP DISPENSER/SOAP FREIGHT 00068797 217654 5190.6229 2011137G GENERAL SUPPLIES GO�F CLUBHOUSE CONSTRUCTION
Supplier 140185 AIR DELIGHTS
42.83 NUMBERS V2.2/PAGES V4.2 00069811 217655 1030.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
Supplier 143789 APPLE ITUNES STORE
43.26 WINE TASTING EVENT 00070134 217656 1845.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REC SELF SUPPORT PROG GENERAL
Supplier 137805 APPLE VALLEY LIQUOR
513.87 LS#1 REMODEL DECORATIONS 217657 5000.1770 2012133G CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
Supplier 100049 BACHMAN'S
13.48 TOT'S HOLIDAY STORYBOOKS 00070138 217658 1875.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REC PRESCHOOL PROGRAMS
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITYOFAPPLEVALLEY 11/29l201a5:47:04
Council Check Register Page - 48
10/16/2D12 -11/30/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO i� Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
Supplier 100048 BARNES & NOBLE
208.40 AED BATTERY 00070556 217659 1900.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS AV COMMUNITY CENTER
Supplier 100709 BATTERIES P�US
16.05 WINE GLASSES-PAINTING CLASS 00070135 217660 1845.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REC SELF SUPPORT PROG GENERAL
Supplier 122012 BED BATH & BEYOND #414
222.88- IT WINDOWS CONNEC-GEORGE 217661 1030.6276 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP OTHERINFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
Supplier 127930 BELLAGIO HOTEL
96.33 DETECTIVE CAMERA SUPPLIES 00070455 217662 1215.6211 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT POLICE DETECTIVE UNIT
Supplier 113057 BEST BUY
24.39 IT GARTNER CONF-BANG 217663 1030.6276 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP OTHERINFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
Supplier 143797 BIG RIVER BREWERY
151.00 CPA LICENSE-BROUGHTEN 00070304 217664 1035.6280 DUES 8 SUBSCRIPTIONS FINANCE
Supplier 101499 MN SOCIETY OF CPAS
7.60 FLANNEL SHIRTS 00069760 217665 5205.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE ARENA 1 MANAGEMENT
Supplier 128497 CABELAS
11.40 FLANNEL SHIRTS 00069760 217666 1060.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE MUNICIPAL BLDG & GROUNDS MNTC
Supplier 126497 CABELAS
11.40 FLANNEL SHIRTS 00069760 217667 1900.6281 UN�FORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE AV COMMUNITY CENTER
Supplier 128497 CABELAS
11.39 FLANNEL SHIRTS 00069760 217668 1510.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE PW ENGINEERING & TECHNICAL
Supplier 128497 CABELAS j
18.99 FLANNEL SHIRTS 00069760 217669 1400.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE WSPECTIONS MANAGEMENT I
Supplier 128497 CABELAS
26.59 FLANNEL SHIRTS 00069760 217670 1530.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE CMF SHOP EQUIP MNTC & REPAIR
Supplier 128497 CABELAS
16.99 FLANNEL SHIRTS 00069760 217671 1520.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE NATURAL RESOURCES
Supplier 128497 CABELAS
91.16 FLANNEL SHIRTS 00069760 217672 1710.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE PARK MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT
Supplier 128497 CABELAS
91.16 FLANNEL SHIRTS 00069760 217673 1600.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE STREET MANAGEMENT
Supplier 128497 CABELAS
37.99 FLANNEL SHIRTS 00069760 217674 5365.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE SEWER MGMT/REPORTS/DATA ENTRY
Supplier 128497 CABELAS
37.99 FLANNEL SHIRTS 00069760 217675 5305.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE WATER MGMT/REPORT/DATA ENTRY
Supplier 128497 CABELAS
15.19 FLANNEL SHIRTS 00069760 217676 5105.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHtNG ALLOWANCE GOLF MANAGEMENT
Supplier 128497 CABELAS
126.83 LUNCH-ELECTIONS/ABB PROCESSID14D70602 217677 1015.6399 OTHER CHARGES CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
Supplier 120941 CARBONE'S PIZZA BAR & GRILL
- 12.34 STAR WARS CLASS SUPPLIES 00069591 217678 1845.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REC SELF SUPPORT PROG GENERAL
__. Supplier 100114 CUB FOODS
RSSCKREG Cvv20000 CITYOFAPP._ ,LLEY 111� l5:47:04
Council Check Register Page - 49
10l16/2012 -11/30/2012
Check # Date Amaunt Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledge Account Description Business Unit
19.84 HAUNTED HALLOWEEN PARTY 00070124 217679 1875.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REC PRESCHOOL PROGRAMS
Supplier 100114 CUB FOODS
24.91 TOT CLASS MOVIE 00070137 217680 1875.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REC PRESCHOOL PROGRAMS
Supplier 100114 CUB FOODS
88.76 CRACKERS/CHEESE TRAYS 00069856 217681 5000.2530 WINE CLUB LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
Supplier 100114 CUB FOODS
15.06 CHIPS/TOMATOS/LETTUCE 00070278 217682 5120.6420 GOLF-FOOD GOLF KITCHEN
Supplier 100114 CUB FOODS
18.88 REPL HANDLE/BACKING PLATE-BOlOD067397 217683 5505.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS STORM DRAIN UTILITY
Supplier 120252 DAN'S SOUTHSIDE MARINE
720.00 IT GARTNER CONF-BANG 217684 1030.6276 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP OTHERINFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
Supplier 143794 DISNEY RESORTS
5.36 TURKEY TREAT SUPPLIES 00069348 217685 1875.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REC PRESCHOOL PROGRAMS
Supplier 120473 DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC.
150.00 AVCC OFFICE WINDOW REPLACEMHOi�8965 217686 7205.6266 REPAIRS-BUILDING RISK MANAGEMENTS/INSURANCE
Supplier 143790 DOUBLE VISION GLASS
140.42 AVCC OFFICE WINDOW REPLACEMHOA68965 277687 7205.6266 REPAIRS-BUILDING RISK MANAGEMENTS/INSURANCE I
Supplier 143790 DOUBLE VISION GLASS
13.81 IT GARTNER CONF-BANG 217688 1030.6276 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP OTHERINFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
Supplier 142517 EARL OF SANDWICH
14.12 IT GARTNER CONF-BANG 217689 1030.6276 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP OTHERINFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
Supplier 142517 EARL OF SANDWICH ,
49.80 IT GARTNER CONF-BANG 00069408 217690 1030.6276 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP OTHERINFORMATION TECHNOLOGY i,
Suppiier 138776 FARMINGTON BAKERY '
7.53 IT GARTNER CONF-BANG 217691 1030.6276 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP OTHERINFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
Supplier 143793 FOOD COURT-RIVERSIDE '
129.99 BOOT PURCHASE-BREITUNG 00068098 217692 5365.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE SEWER MGMT/REPORTS/DATA ENTRY
Supplier 102662 GANDER MOUNTAIN
180.00 GOVT GAAP UPDATE-HEDB/BROUG817�0305 217693 1035.6275 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL FINANCE
Suppiier 100537 MN GFOA
85.00 HOW GOVTACCT WORKS-WEBINAR 217694 1035.6275 SCHOOIS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL FINANCE I
Supplier 100537 MN GFOA
371.88 MN FIRE CHIEFS CONF-THOMPSON 217695 1310.6276 SCHOOLSlCONFERENCESlEXP OTHERFIRE TRAINING
Supplier 138028 HAMPTON INN
371.88 MN FIRE CHIEFS CONF-MATTINGLY 217696 1310.6276 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP OTHERFIRE TRAINING
Suppiier 138028 HAMPTON INN
371.88 MN FIRE CHIEFS CONF-KINGSLEY 217697 1310.6276 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP OTHERFIRE TRAINING
Supplier 138028 HAMPTON INN
371.88 MN FIRE CHIEFS CONF-RUSSELL 217698 1310.6276 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP OTHERFIRE TRAINING
Supplier 138028 HAMPTON INN
195.00 M-STEP CONF-ENGEI 217699 1310.6275 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL FIRE TRAINING
F APP LE VALLEY 11 /29/201 � 5:47:04 '
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY O i
Council Check Register Page - 50
10/16/2012 -11/30/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
Supplier 143795 HTC CUSTOM TRAINING
149.00 ICMA WEBINAR 00069410 217700 1100.6275 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL DEV MANAGEMENT
Supplier 143796 ICMA INTERNET
50,00 GOVT EDUC SEMINAR-HEDB/BROUGHT 217701 1035.6275 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL FINANCE
Supplier 100799 KERN DEWENTER VIERE LTD
49.00 SUBSCRIPTION 00069921 217702 1020.6280 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS HUMAN RESOURCES
Supplier 101089 KIPLINGER WASHWGTON LETTER
64.28 500 BUSINESS CARDS 00070058 217703 2012.6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES CABLE N JOINT POWERS
Supplier 132646 KWIK KOPY BUSINESS SOLUTIONS
29.82 NIKE SHORTS RETURN 00068800 217704 5115.6238 POSTAGE/UPS/FEDEX GOLF PRO SHOP
Supplier 134891 MAIL N PARCEL
418.73 DECK SCREWS/PLYWOOD 00068238 217705 1210.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE FIELD OPERATIONS/PATROL
Supplier 100309 MENARDS ,
6.38 GOURD CLASS SUPPLIES 00069594 217706 1845.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REC SELF SUPPORT PROG GENERAL
Supplier 100309 MENARDS
44.93 PROGRAM SUPPLIES-GENERAL 00069346 217707 1800.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REC PROGRAM GENERAL
Supplier 100748 MICHAELS
11J5 GOURD CLASS SUPPLIES 00069592 217708 1845.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REC SELF SUPPORT PROG GENERAL
Supplier 100748 MICHAELS
171.35 BARREL PUMP-COMPRESSOR 00069297 217709 5270.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS ARENA 2 EQUIPMENT MAINT-HAYES I
Supplier 100640 FLEET FARM
34.07 PRESCHOOL OPEN GYM EQUIPMENfD070126 217710 1800.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REC PROGRAM GENERAL
Supplier 100640 FLEET FARM
50.00 INVESTMENT/FIN FORCAST-HEDBERG 217711 1035.6275 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL FINANCE
Supplier 100537 MN GFOA
245.39 INTL BLDG/RESIDENTIAL CODE 217712 1400.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS MANAGEMENT
Supplier 100333 MINNESOTA'S BOOKSTORE
95.00 NLC EXPO-GOODWIN 217713 1005.6276 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP OTHERMAYOR/CITY COUNCIL
Supplier 100353 NATL LEAGUE OF CITIES
69.00 NPELRA'13 ONLINE TRAINING SUB 00067966 217714 1020.6280 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS HUMAN RESOURCES
Supplier 142514 NPELRA !
86.24 (3) MOUSE TRAPS 00070552 217715 1900.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES AV COMMUNITY CENTER
Supplier 100362 NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMENT
122.82 BALLISTIC GOGGLES/GI.OVES 00069509 217716 1210.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE FIELD OPERATIONS/PATROL
Supplier 143634 OAKLEY MILITARY & GOVERNMENT S
28.89 SANTA LETTER SUPPLIES 00070121 217717 1800.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REC PROGRAM GENERAL
Supplier 100577 OFFICE MAX
22.49 (1) CALENDAR 00070121 217718 1700.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK & RECREATION MANAGEMENT
Supplier 100577 OFFICE MAX
28.34 PARK COMMITTEE REPORT COVER80069287 217719 5205.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA 1 MANAGEMENT
Supplier 100577 OFFICE MAX
R55CKREG CuG20000 CITYOFAPP, tLEY 11/2 :'5:47:04
Council Check Register Page - 51
10/16l2012 -11/30/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledge Account Description Business Unit
42.80 SWEEPER BATTERY-AVCC 00070170 217720 1920.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS HAYES COMMUNITY & SENIOR CTR
Supplier 103436 ORECK FLOORCARE
82.27 LT. HELMET CRESCENTS 00070432 217721 1330.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE FIRE OPERATIONS
Supplier 102255 OUR DESIGNS INC
6.38 GOURD CLASS SUPPLIES 00069593 217722 1845.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REC SELF SUPPORT PROG GENERAL
Supplier 102295 PAHL'S MARKET INC ,
15.73 INTERVIEWS-FINAL PSR DIRECTOR00069919 217723 1020.6399 OTHER CHARGES HUMAN RESOURCES I
Supplier 110472 PANERA BREAD
33.59 ICMA WEBINAR-BOX LUNCHES 00069411 217724 1100.6275 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL DEV MANAGEMENT
Supplier 110472 PANERA BREAD
75.54 INTERVIEWS-FINAL P&R DIRECTOR00069918 217725 1020.6399 OTHER CHARGES HUMAN RESOURCES
. Supplier 110472 PANERA BREAD
70.90 PUMPKIN LIFE FAIR WINNERS 00069917 217726 1020.6399 OTHER CHARGES HUMAN RESOURCES '
Supplier 137114 PANINO BROTHERS
22.49 VEHICLE WASH-SKIPPER PACKAGE00070422 277727 1350.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT FIRE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE ',
Supplier 101292 PARADISE CAR WASH
3.20 STAR WARS CLASS SUPPLIES 00069590 217728 1845.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REC SELF SUPPORT PROG GENERAL
Supplier 102901 PARTY CITY ',
122.44 HOLIDAY CLASS SUPPLIES 00070139 217729 1845.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REC SELF SUPPORT PROG GENERAL ',
Supplier 102901 PARTY CITY
23.50 HOLIDAY PROGRAM SUPPLIES 00070143 217730 1845.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REC SELF SUPPORT PROG GENERAL
Supplier 102901 PARTY CITY
53.55 DOG FOOD-CLOUD 217731 5105.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOIF MANAGEMENT
Supplier 102545 PETCO 612
119.95 PICKLEBALLS 00069250 217732 1800.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REC PROGRAM GENERAL '
Supplier 143791 PICKLEBALL CENTRAL
32.15 MISC SUPPLIES 00069458 217733 1060.6229 GENERAL SUPPUES MUNICIPAL BLDG & GROUNDS MNTC I
I
Supplier 107839 RAINBOW INC i
224.95 VACUUM 00069249 217734� 1900.6211 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT AV COMMUNITY CENTER
Supplier 143792 SEARS
370.30 EVIDENCE COLLECTION SUPPLIES 00070458 217735 1200.6211 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT POLICE MANAGEMENT
Suppiier 100715 SIRCHIE FINGER PRINT LABORATOR
51.38 LOCKER ROOM DOOR-MARKER BO:B.B1I�.9294 217736 5265.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA 2 BLDG MAINTENANCE-HAYES
Suppiier 132732 STAPLES
13.90 NAME BADGES ELECTION JUDGES 00070603 217737 1015.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
Suppiier 132732 STAPLES
39.04 GAS-INVESTIGATIVE VEHICLE 00069517 217738 1210.6212 MOTOR FUELS/OILS POLICE FIELD OPERATIONS/PATROL
Supplier 118585 SUPERAMERICA
22.82 SNACKS-ELECTION JUDGE TRAININTB064950 217739 1015.6399 OTHER CHARGES CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS I
Supplier 100463 TARGET STORES
61.74 (4) MOVIES-NEW RELEASE TUESDA19D070140 217740 1840.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REC TEEN PROGRAMS
I
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OFAPPLE VALLEY 11/29/20135:47:04 �i
Council Check Register Page - 52
10/16/2012 -11/30/2012 I
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
Supplier 100463 TARGET STORES
19.50 TURKEY TREAT SUPPLIES 00070142 217741 1875.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REC PRESCHOOL PROGRAMS
Supplier 100463 TARGET STORES I
7.99 GOURD CLASS SUPPLIES 00069595 217742 1845.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REC SELF SUPPORT PROG GENERAI
Supplier 143525 HOME DEPOT STORE #2833 I
323.51 VOTING SETUP/TAKEDOWN TRUCKOD862935 217743 1015.6310 RENTAL EXPENSE CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS �
Supplier 103476 U-HAUL INTERNATIONAL INC I
8.57 VOTING SETUP/TAKEDOWN TRUCKQD662935 217744 1015.6310 RENTAL EXPENSE CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS I
Suppiier 103476 U-HAUL INTERNATIONAL INC i
20.12 PARKADV COMM PACKET POSTAG�0062442 217745 1700.6238 POSTAGElUPS/FEDEX PARK & RECREATION MANAGEMENT il
Supplier 136287 POSTMASTER
23.82 HALLOWEEN CANDY-PUBLIC SKAT�I��J70802 217746 5205.6229 GENERAL SUPP�IES ARENA 1 MANAGEMENT I
Supplier 102101 WAL-MART I I
46.02 TACKLE BOX-FIREARMS TOOLS 00069520 217747 1210.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE FIELD OPERATIONS/PATROL ',
Supplier 102101 WAL-MART ��
104.44 HALLOWEEN SUPPLIES 00070131 217748 1845.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REC SELF SUPPORT PROG GENERAL �
Supplier 102101 WAL-MART ',
43.25 POETRY JAM/RAP SUPPLIES 00069349 217749 1840.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REC TEEN PROGRAMS
Supplier 102101 WAL-MART
6.29 TREE LIGHTING SUPPLIES 00070144 217750 1800.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REC PROGRAM GENERAL
Supplier 102101 WAL-MART
25.33 POETRY JAM/RAP SUPPIIES 00070144 217751 1845.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REC SELF SUPPORT PROG GENERAL
Supplier 102101 WAL-MART
5.71 TOTS THANKSGIVING SUPPLIES 00070144 217752 1875.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REC PRESCHOOL PROGRAMS
Supplier 102101 WAL-MART
29.95 IT SUBSCRIPTION OCT 217753 1030.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
Suppiier 139978 WUFOO.COM
9,477.14
20727139 17/27/2012 135249 NORTHLAND TRUST SERVICES, INC.
60,666.25 INT L�Q REV BOND 2008 217632 5032.7015 DEBT SERVICE-INTEREST LIQ#3 REV BOND 2008, $3,295
140,000.00 PRINC LIQ REV BOND 2008 217633 5032.6910 BOND PRINCIPAL LIQ#3 REV BOND 2008, $3,295 I
25,822.50 INT GO REF BOND 2008 217634 3197.7015 DEBT SERVICE-INTEREST TAX REF OF 2006, $2,420,000
605,000.00 PRINC GO REF BOND 2008 217635 3197.6910 BOND PRINCIPAL TAX REF OF 2008, $2,420,000
27,546.88 INT GO IMPROV REF BOND 2008 217636 3287.7015 DEBT SERVICE-INTEREST REF BOND OF 2008, $2,415,000
405,000.00 PRINC GO IMPROV REF BOND 2008 217637 3287.6910 BOND PRINCIPAL REF BOND OF 2008, $2,415,000
440,000.00 PRINC GO REF ROAD BOND 2009A 217638 3307.6910 BOND PRINCIPAL REF BONDS OF 2009, $2,775,000
36,400.00 INT GO REF ROAD 80ND 2009A 217639 3307.7015 DEBT SERVICE-INTEREST REF BONDS OF 2009, $2,775,000
19,450.00 INT GO REF BOND 2010A 217640 3322.7015 DEBT SERVICE-INTEREST BONDS OF 2004, $4,325,000
11,275.00 INT GO REF BOND 2010A 217641 3332.7015 DEBT SERVICE-INTEREST BONDS OF 2006, $5,785,000
3,550.00 INT GO REF BOND 2010A 217642 3337.7015 DEBT SERVICE-INTEREST EQUIP CERT OF 2006. $860,000
R55CKREG Cv�;20000 CITYOFAPF. :LLEY 11/� .5:47:04
Council Check Register Page - 53
10/16/2012 —11/30/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
2,025.00 INT GO REF BOND 2010A 217643 5505.7015 DEBT SERVICE-INTEREST STORM DRAIN UTILITY
425.00 FEE GO REF BOND 2010A 217644 5505.7020 BOND PAYING AGENT FEES STORM DRAIN UTILITY
280,000.00 PRINC GO REF BOND 2010A 217645 3322.6910 BOND PRINCIPAL BONDS OF 2004, $4,325,000
365,000.00 PRINC GO REF BOND 2010A 217646 3332.6910 BOND PRINCIPAL BONDS OF 2006, $5,785,000
105,000.00 PRINC GO REF BOND 2010A 217647 3337.6910 BOND PRINCIPAL EQUIP CERT OF 2006, $860,000
85,OD0.00 PRINC GO REF BOND 2010A 217645 5505.6910 BOND PRINCIPAL STORM DRAIN UTILITY
2,612,160.63
20121140 11/28/2012 101348 DEPOSITORY TRUST COMPANY
95,723.75 INT GO REFUND PARK BOND 2004 217811 20121201 3062.7015 DEBT SERVICE-INTEREST BONDS OF 1997, $8,370,000
7,255.00 INT CEMETERY BOND 2004 217812 20121201 3067.7015 DEBT SERVICE-INTEREST BONDS OF 1997, $795,000
1,543.75 INT GO REFUND BOND 2004 217813 20121207 3192.7015 DEBT SERVICE-INTEREST REF BONDS OF 2004, $565,000
7,600.00 INT RECREA REV REFUND 2004 217814 20121201 5260.7015 DEBT SERVICE-INTEREST ARENA 2 MANAGEMENT-HAYES
2,250.00 INT GO REFUND BOND 2002 217815 20121201 5405.7015 DEBT SERVICE-INTEREST 95-493/494 VALLEYWOOD RES I�
114,372.50
20721141 17/30/2012 130957 GENESIS EMPLOYEE BENEFITS INC I
159.95 FLEX SPENDING MEDICAL- 2012 217816 121105N 9000.2119 ACCRUED FLEX SPENDING PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
384.60 FLEX SPENDING DAYCARE - 2012 217817 1211050 9000.2119 ACCRUED FLEX SPENDING PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
544.55
3,513,202.33 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals
Check Total 648,122.17
'' � /� 1 v TransferTotal 2,749,684.65
/''� O" d
� Pay ModeX Total 175,395.51
Total Payments 3,513,202.33
�
i
I
R55CKSUM LUvz0000 CITY OF APF� ;LLEY 11/� a5:49:42
Council Check Summary Page - 1
10/16/2012 - 11/30/2012
Company Amount
01000 GENERAL FUND 119,186.25
02010 CABLE TV RESERVE FUND 547.68
03060 PARK BOND 1997, $8,370,000 95,723.75
03065 CEMETERY BOND 1997, $795,000 7,255.00
03190 REF STATE AID 2004, $565,000 1,543.75
03195 GO TAXBL REF 2008, $2,420,000 630,822.50
03285 REF GO BOND 2008, $2,415,000 432,546.88
03305 STAID RD REF 2009,$2,775,000 476,400.00
D3320 GO IMP BOND 2004, $4,325,000 299,450.00
03330 GO IMP BOND 2006, $5,785,000 376,275.00
03335 EQ CERT 2006, $860,000 108,550.00
04500 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 600.25
04700 TIF DIST#13-CAPITAL PROJECTS 149,900.00
05000 LIQUOR FUND 232,704.26
05030 LIQ REV BOND 2008, $3,295,000 200,666.25
05100 GOLF FUND 5,244.89
05200 ARENAFUND 11,836.31
05300 WRTER & SEWER FUND 260,551.35
05400 WATER/SEWER CONNECTION CHG FUN 2,250.00
05500 STORM DRAINAGE UTILITY FUND 89,432.37
05600 CEMETERY FUND LEVEL PROGRAM 1,197.00
05800 STREET LIGHT UTIL FUND 3,657.07
07000 LODGING TAX FUND 6,026.80
07200 RISK MANAGEMENT/INSURANCE FUND 290.42 i
09000 PAYROLL CLEARING FUND 544.55
RepartTotals 3,513,202.33
, ,
�
,
R55CKREG �.,.�20000 CITYOFAPF �LEY 12/E 8:49:10 I
Council Check Register Pa � I
11/27/2012 -12/7/2012 I
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
7522 12/7/2072 137670 A H HERMEL COMPANY
128.33 TAX#1 00050148 218212 332067 5015.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
708.50 NOTAX#1 00050148 218212 332067 5015.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
836.83
1523 12/7/2012 100036 APPLE VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMER
15.00 ADMIN-CNAMBER LUNCH, LAWELL 00070604 218273 15002 1010.6275 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCALADMINISTRATION
30.00 POL-CHAMBER LUNCH TIETZ, DEMIDq070604 218273 15002 1200.6275 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP IOCAL POLICE MANAGEMENT
30.00 DEV CHAMBER LUNCH DYKES, B0�0ff70604 218273 15002 1100.6275 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL DEV MANAGEMENT
30.00 COUNC-CHAMBER LUNCH, HAMANIOQa00604 218273 15002 1005.6275 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL MAYORlCITY COUNCIL
105.00
1524 1217/2072 100049 BACHMAN'S
694.47 CEMETERY-LINDEN GREENSPIRE 218120 445101 5605.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES CEMETERY
36.33- AVCC-RETURN HOLIDAY GREENER`00069141 218267 20121120 1900.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES AV COMMUNITY CENTER
249.89 AVCC-HOLIDAY GREENERY 00069141 218267 20121120 1900.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES AV COMMUNITY CENTER
908.03
1525 72/7/2012 100828 BREUER, SCOTTA
278.46 MN REC ASSOC CONF-BREUER-BRAIN 218213 20120920 1705.6276 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP OTHERPARK & RECREATION MGMT TRAING
27.19 REC-MILEAGE NOV BREUER 218214 20121126 1705.6275 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL PARK & RECREATION MGMT TRAING
56.04 REC-MILEAGE NOV BREUER 218214 20121126 1700.6277 MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE PARK & RECREATION MANAGEMENT
361.69
1626 1217/2072 701270 BROWNELLS INC
427.44 POL-MISC GENERAL SUPPLIES 00069518 218079 8054342 1210.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE FIELD OPERATIONS/PATROL
27.50- 00069518 218079 8054342 1000.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
401.73 POL-MISC GENERAL SUPPLIES 00069521 218080 805745800 1210.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE FIELD OPERATIONS/PATROL
25.84- 00069521 218080 805745800 1000.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
775.83
7527 72R/2012 ` 100097 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIPMENT
2,625.00 FIRE-FLOW CHECK OF AIRPAK 00035259 218081 147222 1330.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT FIRE OPERATIONS
168.50 FIRE-REGULATOR BODY ASSY RPR00035259 218082 147147 1330.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT FIRE OPERATIONS
2,793.50
I
1628 121712012 100102 COLLEGE CITY BEVERAGE
573.20 GOLF-KTN BEER 00008159 218215 121213 5120.6419 GOLF-BEER GOLF KITCHEN
573.20
1529 12/7/2012 140567 DAKOTA PUMP 8 CONTROL
1,520.00 UTIL-ANNUAL INSP SAN LIFT STNS 218121 18066 5380.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT SEWER LIFT STN REPAIR & MNTC
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12/6/2012 8:49:10
Council Check Register Page - 2
11/27/2012 —12l7/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledge Accaunt Description Business Unit
380.00 UTIL-ANNUAL INSP STM WET/DRY W 218122 18068 5305.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT WATER MGMT/REPORT/DATA ENTRY
1,900.00
1530 72RI2012 101365 ECM PUBLISHERS INC
170.10 LEGALAD-ALIMAGNETAERATION 218285 392150 1015.6239 PRINTING CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
72.00 LEGALAD-FARDUAR AERATION 218286 392154 1015.6239 PRINTING CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS I
242.10
1531 72I712012 100685 EMERGENCYAPPARATUS MAINTENANC
1,011.85 FIRE-PREV AERIAL MAINT LADDER3D0051211 218083 64019 1350.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT FIRE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
1,176.24 FIRE-PREV AERIAL MAINT LADDER100051211 218084 64018 1350.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT FIRE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
2,188.09
1532 12/7I2012 120313 FASTENAL COMPANY
99.94 PK-TILE ADHESIVE 00069143 218085 MNLAK84907 1735.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK PLAY EQUIPMENT MAINTENANC
99.94
1533 72I7/2012 137790 GOVERNMENTJOBS.COM INC
3,774.00 HR-LICENSE IE RENEWAL-NEOGOV 218135 77878 1020.6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES
3,774.00
1534 1217/2012 140514 GRAFFITI SOLUTIONS INC
340.93 PK-ELEPHANT SNOT GRAFFITI RM�D068912 218086 16172 1720.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE
340.93 I
1535 72/7/2012 700277 GRAINGER
43.02 PK-DIMMABLE BULBS 00069140 218268 9979086445 1730.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE
77.21 SWIM-PIPE INSULATION, ELBOW 00069140 218268 9979086445 1940.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES AQUATIC SWIM CENTER
109.30 AVCC-PIPE INSULATION, ELBOW D0069140 218268 9979086445 1900.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES AV COMMUNITY CENTER I
129.59 PK-RECOVERY STRAP 00069140 218268 9979086445 1765.6215 E�UIPMENT-PARTS PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
359.12
7536 1217/2012 100222 HACH COMPANY
434.35 UTIL-FLUORIDE/REAGENT SET 00069615 218123 8035872 5325,6214 CHEMICALS WATER TREATMENT FCLTY MNTClRPR
434.35
1537 121712072 101169 HAWKINS INC
1,780.54 UTIL-POTASSIUM PERMANGANATE 218124 3406190 5325.6214 CHEMICALS WATER TREATMENT FCITY MNTC/RPR
1,780.54
7538 72/712012 118099 JEFPERSON FIRE 8 SAFETY INC
1,118.77 FIRE-CONVERSON KIT NOZZLE 00051259 218087 192008 1330.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS FIRE OPERATIONS' �
R55CKREG Lu.d20000 CITYOFAPP. _LEY 12/6. 3:49:10
Council Check Register Page - 3
11/27/2012 -12/7/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledge Account Description Business Unit
1,118.77 I
1539 72/7/2012 107696 LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERV
1,620.00 POL UNION DUES #77 218248 12041215291813 9000.2120 ACCRUED BENEFIT LIABILITY PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
1, 620.00
1540 12/7/2012 100279 LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES
405.00 SGT UNION DUES #243 218255 1204121529183 9000.2120 ACCRUED BENEFIT LIABILITY PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
405.00
1641 72I7/2012 138249 MINNESOTA ENVIRONMENTAL FUND
44.50 MINNESOTA ENVIRONMENTAL FUND 218253 12041215291818 90002120 ACCRUED BENEFIT LIABILITY PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
44.50
1542 12/7I2072 711219 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC
73.53 STR-STROBE TUBE #338 00069195 218088 31991 1630.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS STREET EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
73.53
7543 12/7/2012 118834 OPEN YOUR HEART
125.50 218249 12041215291814 9000.2120 ACCRUED BENEF�T LIABILITY PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
125.50
1644 72/7/2012 702295 PAHL'3 MARKET INC
155.66 AVCC-MISC DECORATIONS 00069142 218089 24484 1900.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES AV COMMUNITY CENTER
155.66 I
1545 121712012 100600 RIGID HITCH INC �
13.89 UTIL-ADAPTER 00035199 218090 141874901 5390.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS SWR EQUIPNEHICLE MISC MNTC/RP
13.89
1546 72I712012 101709 SHAMROCK DISPOSAL I
210.50 STR-30 YD DUMPSTER 00039459 218216 48261 1610.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVSTREET/BOULEVARD REPAIR & MNTC I
22676 CMF-30 YD DUMPSTER 00039459 218216 48261 1540.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVCMF BUILDINGS & GROUNDS MNTC I
437.25 PK-30 YD DUMPSTER 00039459 218216 48261 1720.6240 CLEANING SERVICElGARBAGE REMOVPARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE !
874.51
7547 121712012 101226 STREAMLINE DESIGN INC
98.00 REC-JERSEY FOR BASKETBALL TE�IQ069003 218091 31382 1870.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REC BASKETBALL
98.00
7548 72/712012 700457 STREICHERS INC
1,616.48 POL-AMMO 00051263 218092 1974243 1200.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE MANAGEMENT
I
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12l6/2012 8:49:10
Council Check Register Page - 4
11/2712012 -12/7/2012
Check # Date Amount Suppiier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
1,616.48
1549 12I7/2072 101123 USA BLUE BOOK
382.39 UTIL-CHLORINE TESTING PILLOWS 00069616 218125 817704 5325.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT FCLTY MNTC/RPR
382.39
1650 12RI2012 100496 VAN PAPER CO
5.00- CMBAGS#1 00008795 218222 256971 5025.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR #1 OPERATIONS
20.71- CMBAGS#3 00008795 218223 256025 5095.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR #3 OPERATIONS
1.38- DISCT#3 00008795 218224 256457 5095.6333 GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS LIQUOR #3 OPERATIONS
138.08 BAGS#3 00008795 218224 256457 5095.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR #3 OPERATIONS
110.99
1551 12/7/2072 71236b WERNER ELECTRIC SUPPLY
15.76 NR-BATTERIES 00051258 218352 S7219826001 1520.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS NATURAL RESOURCES
25.35 FIN-BATTERIES 00051258 218352 S7219826001 1035.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS FINANCE
44.96 GOLF-BATTERIES 00051258 218352 57219826001 5105.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS GOLF MANAGEMENT
81.30 POL-BATTERIES 00051258 218352 S7219826001 1200.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS POLICE MANAGEMENT I
167.37
7552 1217/2012 101342 WEST PAYMENT CENTER
98.06 POL CLEAR CHGS-OCT 00050105 218225 825985847 1215.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES POLICE DETECTIVE UNIT
98.06
260285 17I30/2012 100334 MN DEPT OF HEALTH
332.00 REC FOOD LICENSE-TEEN CTR 2013 217513 1840.6280 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS REC TEEN PROGRAMS
332.00 RQP FOOD LICENSE 2013 217514 1945.6280 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS QUARRY POINTE
664.00
250286 17/30/2012 101376 MN DEPT OF HEALTH �I
24,110.00 UTIL WTR SVC CONNECT FEE-4TH Q 217623 20121128 5300.2332 STATE WATER TESTING FEE WATER 8 SEWER FUND BAL SHEET I
Supplier 100334 MN DEPT OF HEALTH
24,17 0.00
250287 1215/2072 135030 CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC
53.21 REF OVPMT UTIL-118 SHOSHONI TR 218322 20121129 5301.4997 WATER/SEWER ACCT REFUNDS WATER & SEWER FUND REVENUE
5321
250288 12/5/2012 100945 HAGERT, TRUDY J '
32.18 REF OVPMT UTIL-100 CTY RD 42 218318 20121129 5301.4997 WATER/SEWER ACCT REFUNDS WATER & SEWER FUND REVENUE
32.18 �I
CITYOFAPP� .LLEY 12/8 8:49:10
R55CKREG LvG20000 °
Council Check Register Page - 5
11/27/2012 -12/7/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Expla nation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Accaunt Description Business Unit
250289 12I5/2012 143813 JACKSON, RUTH
201.45 REF OVPMT UTIL-15793 COBBLEST 218319 20121129 5301.4997 WATER/SEWER ACCT REFUNDS WATER & SEWER FUND REVENUE
201.45
250290 72/5/2012 143814 KRISNAAPTS
143.72 REF OVPMT UTIL-14375 HAYES RD 218320 20121129 5301.4997 WATER/SEWER ACCT REFUNDS WATER & SEWER FUND REVENUE
143.72
250291 12/SI2012 143815 REI REAL ESTATE & MGMT �
43.04 REF OVPMT UTIL-13552 FAIRLAWN 218321 20121129 5301.4997 WATER/SEWER ACCT REFUNDS WATER & SEWER FUND REVENUE
43.04
250292 72/5I2072 100372 PAUSTIS $ SONS
550.01 BEER#1 OOOD1291 218337 8375552 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
270.00 BEER#3 00001291 218338 8373971 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
670.02 BEER#3 00001291 218339 8375553 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
1.25 FREIGHT#1 00001291 218340 8374941 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
87.00 WINE#1 00001291 218340 8374941 5015.6520 VNNE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
22.50 FREIGHT#1 00001291 218341 8375632 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
1,417.02 WINE#1 00001291 218341 8375632 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
11.25 FREIGHT#1 OOOD1291 218342 8377664 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
816.00 1MNE#1 00001291 218342 8377664 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
12.50 FREIGHT#2 00001291 218343 8375629 5055.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
878.01 WINE#2 00001291 218343 8375629 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
11.25 FREIGHT#2 00001291 218344 6377574 5055.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
831.02 WINE#2 00001291 218344 8377574 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
1.25 FREIGHT#3 00001291 218345 8374945 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
87.00 WINE#3 00001291 218345 8374945 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
6.25 FREIGHT#3 00001291 218346 8374997 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
275.00 WINE#3 00001291 218346 8374997 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
25.00 FREIGHT#3 00001291 218347 8375631 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
1,660.00 WINE#3 00001291 218347 8375631 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
17.50 FREIGHT#3 00001291 218348 8376243 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
1,171.47 WINE#3 00001291 218348 8376243 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
2.50 FREIGHT#3 00001291 218349 8376643 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
182.00 WINE#3 00001291 218349 8376643 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
1.25 FREIGHT#3 00001291 218350 8376804 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
111.00 WINE#3 00001291 218350 8376804 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
8.75 FREIGHT#3 00001291 218351 8377575 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LiQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
854.21 WINE#3 00001291 218351 8377575 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
9,981.01
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12/6/2012 8:49:10
Council Check Register Pa9e " 6
11/27/2012 -12/7/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledge Account Description Business Unit
250293 12/5/2012 707437 HEALTH FUND, THE
128.50 HEALTH FUND DEDUCTION 218247 12041215291812 9000.2120 ACCRUED BENEFIT LIABILITY PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
128.50
250294 121SI2012 701199 NCPERS MINNESOTA
752.00 PERA LIFE INSURANCE-SEPTEMBER 218324 121201T 9000.2120 ACCRUED BENEFIT LIABILITY PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
752.00
250295 1215/2012 135192 BASBALLE, LAURA L
21.43 REPAIR TO PANTS 218093 20120527 1300.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE FIRE MANAGEMENT
21.43
250296 12/5/2012 171216 BERGER, LANCE A '
3.66 FIRE-FUEL FOR HURST TOOL 218094 20121126 1330.6212 MOTOR FUELS/OILS FIRE OPERATIONS I
3.66 I
250297 12/5/2012 101055 BIRD, WILLIAM A
38.55 REC-MILEAGE OCT B BIRD 218269 20121121 1700.6275 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCESlEXP LOCAL PARK & RECREATION MANAGEMENT
70.22 REC-MILEAGEAUG-NOV B BIRD 216269 20121121 1700.6277 MILEAGE/AUTOALLOWANCE PARK & RECREATION MANAGEMENT
110.43 REC-MILEAGE FEB-AUG B BiRD 218270 20120815 1705.6277 MILEAGE/AUTOALLOWANCE PARK & RECREATION MGMT TRAING
219.20
250298 12/5/2072 100750 BODMER, KATHLEEN L
27.08 DEV-PLANNING MILEAGE 218271 20121129 1100.6277 MILEAGE/AUTOALLOWANCE DEV MANAGEMENT
143.90 CORRIDORS OF OPPORTUNITY 218271 20121129 1147.6277 MIIEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE HUD SUST COMM REG PLNG GRANT
770.98
260299 12I512012 737984 BORASH, PETER J
150.00 STR-BOOTS 218210 20121115 1600.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHINGALLOWANCE STREETMANAGEMENT
150.00
250300 12/5/2012 100198 GETTING, JON A
129.71 STR-BOOTS 218211 20121125 1600.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHINGALLOWANCE STREETMANAGEMENT
129.71
250307 1215/2012 100414 RUSSELL, CHARLES �,
64.21 FIRE-VELCRO ONE WRAP STRAP 218095 20121121 1330.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE OPERATIONS
64.21
250302 12I5/2072 117062 WEISS, TODD R
35.52 REC-MILEAGE NOV WEISS 218139 20121130 1700.6277 MILEAGE/AUTOALLOWANCE PARK & RECREATION MANAGEMENT
35.52
�
I
,
R55CKREG � � v20000 CITY OF APF �LEY 12/t 8:49:10
Council Check Register Page - 7
11/27l2012 —12/7/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
250303 12/5/2072 730701 BREAN, KAREN
36.00 SVC RENDERED ELECTION JUDGE AD 218140 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
36.00
250304 12/6/2012 101822 BROMUND, KAREN J
46.00 SVC RENDERED ELECTION JUDGE AD 218141 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
46.00
250305 12I5/2012 733993 BURKE, ANITA
37.50 SVC RENDERED ELECTION JUDGE AD 218142 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
37.50
250306 72/5/2012 122906 PESNOG, KAARE
36.00 SVC RENDERED ELECTION JUDGE AD 218143 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
36.00
250307 12/5/2012 122897 GOULD, JANA J
155.73 SVC RENDERED-ELECTION JUDGE 218078 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERKlELECTIONS
155.13
250308 72/5/2012 722657 HUBER, CRAIG
36.50 SVC RENDERED ELECTION JUDGE AD 218144 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS I
36.50
250309 1215I2012 101605 MADIGAN, JUDITH A
38.50 SVC RENDERED ELECTION JUDGEAD 218146 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS i
38.50 �
260310 72I6/2072 101870 MCDONALD, CYNTHIA J
38.00 SVC RENDERED ELECTION JUDGE AD 218147 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
38.00 I
I
250371 12/S/2012 713389 PASEKA, LINDA L !
47.00 SVC RENDERED ELECTION JUDGE AD 218145 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
47.00
250312 721SI2012 133983 ROWLEY, PHYLLIS ANN
36.50 SVC RENDERED ELECTION JUDGE AD 218148 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
36.50 ,
I
250313 1215/2012 140257 VORACHEK, KELLY
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12/6/2012 8:49:10
R55CKREG LOG20000 I
Council Check Register Pa9e " 8
11/27/2012 -12/7/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit I
37.00 SVC RENDERED ELECTION JUDGE AD 218149 20121106 1015.6236 ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS I
37.00
250314 12/6/2072 114334 ALI, IMTIAZ AND ARLENE I
350.00 OAKWILT SUPPRES COST SHR PROG 218150 239456 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES
350.00
250315 12/6/2012 135132 ANDERSEN, MICHAELA
400.00 OAKWILT SUPPRES COST SHR PROG 218151 77 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES
400.00
250316 72/6/2012 737736 ARTHUR, BRAD
395.29 ALAMO INJ COST SHR PROGRAM 218152 64084 2072.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES REFORESTATION I I II
395.29
250317 12/6/2012 121482 BERGQUIST, DAVID
359.68 ALAMO INJ COST SHR PROGRAM 218153 20120731 2072.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES REFORESTATION
359.68
250318 72/5/2012 740833 BERKLEY, DAVE & ANDREA
112.50 OAKWILT SUPPRES COST SHR PROG 218159 20120509 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES i
112.50
250319 12/6/2072 179897 BIECHLER, TOM 8 TERESA
107.13 OAKWILT SUPPRES COST SHR PROG 218154 20120803 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES I
174.12 ALAMO INJ COST SHR PROGRAM 218155 20120609 2072.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES REFORESTATION i
281.25
250320 12/512072 140830 BODURTHA, DAVID �
200.00 OAKWILT SUPPRES COST SHR PROG 218156 20120529 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES
200.00
I
250321 7215/2072 119898 BOELKE, ARNOLD ',
500.00 OAKWILT SUPPRES COST SHR PROG 218157 5731 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES
500.00 ,
I
250322 72I512012 143798 BROWN, CHRIS 8 CHRISTINE
200.00 OAKWILT SUPPRES COST SHR PROG 218158 87 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES
200.00 I
250323 12/5/2012 123022 CASEY, KEVIN & MARY I �
200.00 OAKWILT SUPPRES COST SHR PROG 218160 104667 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOUR'
R55CKREG `�...�20000 CITYOFAPF ,.LLEY 12/t 8:49:10
Council Check Register Page - 9
11/27/2012 -12/7/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledge Accaunt Description Business Unit
200.00
250324 72lSI2012 118596 CLARK, LOUIS 8 KAREN
200.00 OAKWILT SUPPRES COST SHR PROG 218161 20120830 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES
200.00
250325 12I5/2012 138228 DALSETH, PASCAL & JENNIPER
235.68 ALAMO INJ COST SHR PROGRAM 218162 200515 2072.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES REFORESTATION
235.68
250326 72/5/2012 118601 DIEHL, STEVEN & ANGELA
200.00 OAKWILT SUPPRES COST SHR PROG 218163 3797 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES ,
200.00 i
260327 12/5/2012 102308 DIRKS, DOUGLAS d� PATRICIA
175.00 OAKWILT SUPPRES COST SHR PROG , 218164 6827 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES
175.00
250328 12/SI2072 109208 DODDS, TIM
400.00 OAKWILT SUPPRES COST SHR PROG 218165 104669 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES
400.00
250329 12/5/2012 143810 DREHMEL, BETSY
200.00 OAKWILT SUPPRES COST SHR PROG 218166 208409 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES
200.00
250330 121512072 121570 DURDA, STAN
200.00 OAKWILT SUPPRES COST SHR PROG 218167 20121008 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES
20�.00
250337 72/512012 143799 EVERMOORCOMMUNITYASSN
500.00 OAKWILT SUPPRES COST SHR PROG 218168 65991 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES I
500.00 I
I
250332 1215/2012 728242 FLESHER, JEAN �
200.00 OAKWILT SUPPRES COST SHR PROG 218169 20120628 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES I�
200.00 I I I
260333 12/5@012 121561 GOLDER, KEN I I
200.00 OAKWiLT SUPPRES COST SHR PROG 218170 20120710 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES ',
200.00 �
I
I
I
�
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12/6/2012 6:49:10 I
Council Check Register Page - 10 '
I
11/27/2012 -12/7/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledge Account Description Business Unit
250334 12/5/2072 743706 GORT, STEVE
200.00 OAKWILT SUPPRES COST SHR PROG 218176 20120811 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES
200.00 ,
250335 12/5/2012 142599 HAYDEN, TERRY
400.00 OAKIMLT SUPPRES COST SHR PROG 218171 75309 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES I
96.41 ALAMO INJ COST SHR PROGRAM 218353 74855 2072.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES REFORESTATION
496.41
250336 12ISI2012 109214 HERLL, MARK 3 PATRICIA
500.00 ALAMO INJ COST SHR PROGRAM 218172 63096 2072.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES REFORESTATION I
500.00
260337 72/5/2012 121608 HYATT, KIRK I
242.50 OAKWILT SUPPRES COST SHR PROG 218174 104670 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES I
242.50
250338 121512012 119976 JOHNSEN, RICK '
400.00 OAKWILT SUPPRES COST SHR PROG 218175 20121012 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES
400.00 I
250339 72l5/2012 143707 JOHNSON, BRETT I
125.00 OAKWILT SUPPRES COST SHR PROG 218177 20121002 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES �
125.00 '
250340 72/5/2072 743803 JORGENSEN, RICHARD
125.00 OAKWILT SUPPRES COST SHR PROG 218178 20120823 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES �
125.00 ',
I
260341 12/5/2012 742433 KJORLIEN, MARILYN M '
200.00 OAKWILT SUPPRES COST SHR PROG 218179 5772 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES
200.00 '
250342 12/5/2012 121526 LEACH, TOM � DEANNA
500.00 OAKWILT SUPPRES COST SHR PROG 218180 20120927 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES
500.00
250343 72/5/2012 143804 LENTZ, NORMAN C
200.00 OAKWILT SUPPRES COST SHR PROG 218181 20120813 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES
200.00
250344 121b1' 135b82 LEOW, CHOY
i
_.. , _..-
, I
I
R55CKREG Lv�20000 CITY OF APP. ,�LEY 12/6 8:49:10
Council Check Register Pa98 - ��
11/27/2012 -12/7/2012
Check # Date Amount Suppiier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Acwunt Description Business Unit
160.32 OAKWIIT SUPPRES COST SHR PROG 218182 1692 1520.6249 OTNER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES
160.32
250345 12/5/2072 779932 LINN, JAN & JOY
276.00 ALAMO INJ COST SHR PROGRAM 218201 206365 2072.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES REFORESTATION
276.00 '
250346 121612012 737732 MATTSON, ROBERT 8� LEE ANN
200.00 OAKWILT SUPPRES COST SHR PROG 218183 5777 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES '
200.00
250347 72/5/2012 178624 MCKUNE, MICHAEL 8 JOLENE '
200.00 OAKWILT SUPPRES COST SHR PROG 218184 3764 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES
200.00
250348 12ISI2012 143800 MEYER, BRIAN I
400.00 OAKIMLT SUPPRES COST SHR PROG 218202 20120618 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES
400.00 I
250349 72/5/2012 142434 MILON, WILLIAM 8 BARBARA
200.00 OAKWILT SUPPRES COST SHR PROG 218200 75334 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES
200.00
250350 12/5/2012 142424 MOORE, HELEN ',
200.00 OAKWILT SUPPRES COST SHR PROG 218185 20120727 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES
200.00 '
250351 12/5/2072 143806 NOLTING, JIM i
160.13 OAKWILT SUPPRES COST SHR PROG 218186 2765 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES I
160.13 I
260352 12/6/2072 142577 O'NEILL, CHERI '
241.01 OAKWILT SUPPRES COST SHR PROG 218187 20120915 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES
241.01 '
I
250353 12/5/2012 140993 PERKINS, RON ��
200.00 OAKVNLT SUPPRES COST SHR PROG 218188 20120830 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES
200.00
250354 12I5/2072 728730 PRESTON, RICHARD 8� KATHLEEN
400.00 OAKWILT SUPPRES COST SHR PROG 218189 104666 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES
400.00 I
I
I
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12/6/2012 8:49:10 I I
Council Check Register Pa9e - � 2
• �v2�no�2 -�2m2o�2 '
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
250355 12ISI2012 143806 REIERSGORD, LAURA
200.00 OAKWILT SUPPRES COST SHR PROG 218190 20120821 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAI SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES
200.00
2503b6 12/b12012 138706 RIVERS, JOHN
200.00 OAKWILT SUPPRES COST SHR PROG 218191 63504 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES
500.00 ALAMO INJ COST SHR PROGRAM 218192 63313 2072.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES REFORESTATION
700.00
250357 72/5/2012 119970 RODEO HILLS ASSOCIATION
350.00 OAKWILT SUPPRES COST SHR PROG 218173 20121022 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES
350.00 '
2503b8 1216I2072 121524 ROSSMAN, JAMES
200.00 OAKWILT SUPPRES COST SHR PROG 218193 20120809 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES
200.00 �,
250359 12/5@012 138730 SCHUMANN, ROBERT I �
500.00 ALAMO INJ COST SHR PROGRAM 218194 20120520 2072.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES REFORESTATION
500.00
250360 12f6/2012 14380T SIERRA, JEAN
200.00 OAKWILT SUPPRES COST SHR PROG 218195 20121009 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES
200.00
250361 12/5/2012 143808 THIEWES, BRUCE '�
112.50 OAKVNLT SUPPRES COST SHR PROG 218196 104671 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES
112.50
250362 12/6I2072 122965 THOMAS, SCOTT
50.00 OAKWILT SUPPRES COST SHR PROG 218203 239485 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURA� RESOURCES
80.00 I�
250363 72/5/2012 143801 THOMPSON, KATRINA I
200.00 OAKWILT SUPPRES COST SHR PROG 216204 20121016 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES
200.00
250364 1215/2072 139048 TOLLEFSON, COLLEEN �,
53.57 OAKVNLT SUPPRES COST SHR PROG 218197 20120628 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES
53.57
�
RSSCKREG �ov20000 CITYOFAPF ,LLEY 12/� 8:49:10
Council Check Register Page - 13
11/27/2012 —12/7/2012
Check # Date Amount Suppiier / Explanati PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
260365 72/5J2072 143812 VITTENBOGAARD, JOHN
100.00 OAKWtLT SUPPRES COST SHR PROG 218205 20121117 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES
100.00
250366 12/SI2012 143809 WELFORD, ROBERT
150.00 OAKWILT SUPPRES COST SHR PROG 218198 20120925 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES
150.00
250367 12I512012 143802 WESTERING, DON
400.00 OAKWILT SUPPRES COST SHR PROG 218206 20121027 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES
500.00 ALAMO INJ COST SHR PROGRAM 218207 20121107 2072.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES REFORESTATION
900.00
260368 72I612012 142607 WILDWOOD PHASE 11
500.00 OAKWiLT SUPPRES COST SHR PROG 218208 5916 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES
200.00 OAKVNLT SUPPRES COST SHR PROG 218209 20120731 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES
700.00
250369 12/5/2012 134035 WILSON, STEVEN
80.35 OAKWILT SUPPRES COST SHR PROG 218199 6761 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES
80.35
250370 12/5/2012 100019 AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSN
1,065.00 APWA MEMB RNWL 2/1/13-1/31/14 218226 20121108 1000.1560 PREPAID EXPENSES GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
1, 065.00
250377 12/SI2072 101209 ANDERSON.IOHNSON ASSOCIATES IN
5,780.00 REC-SITE PLANNING FOR QP 00051196 218266 121021012 1700.6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES PARK & RECREATION MANAGEMENT
5,780.00
250372 12I612072 136677 ARCHETYPE SIGNMAKERS '
3,203.00 LIQ1-SALES FLOOR SIGNAGE 218227 44995 5000.1770 2012133G CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
3,203.00 I
260373 72/6/2012 100820 AT&T MOBILITY
417.77 GOLF MOBILE PHONE NOV 00050012 218228 839223835X11202 5105.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS GOLF MANAGEMENT
012
417.77 '
250374 12/5/2012 731562 BTR OF MINNESOTA
38.44 FIRE-12 VOLT MOTOR #4988 00070704 218096 19763 1350.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS FIRE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
38.44 ,
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12/6/2012 8:49:10
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register Page - 14
11/27l2012 -12/7/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
250375 72/5/2072 121074 BUCKEYE CLEANING CENTER
72.66 HCSC-VACUUM BAGS 00070174 218097 17479 1920.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES HAYES COMMUNITY & SENIOR CTR
72.66
250376 72ISI2012 100089 CARQUEST
26.72 FIRE-MINIATURE LAMP 00035174 218274 1594182427 1350.6215 E�UIPMENT PARTS FIRE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
9.81 PK-BELT DRESSING 00035174 218275 1594182541 1765.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
34.58 PK-AIR, FUEL FILTERS 00035174 218276 1594182412 1765.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
35.87 STR-BULB 00035174 218277 1594182771 1630.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS STREET EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE I
8.54 PK-VBELT 00035174 218278 1594182840 1765.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ',
7.55 UTIL-HYD FILTER 00035174 218279 1594182848 5345.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS WATER EQUIPNEHICLE/MISC MNTC I
4.22 STR-HOSE MENDER 00035174 218280 1594183425 1630.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS STREET EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
207.56 STR-FUEL PUMP ASSEMBLY 00035174 218281 1594183262 1630.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS STREET EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
14.68 POL-REARVIEW MIRROR ADHESIVEA0035174 218282 1594183528 1210.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS POLICE FIELD OPERATIONS/PATROL
13.65 POL-PULLEY 00035174 216283 1594183436 1210.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS POLICE FIELD OPERATIONS/PATROL
363.18
250377 721512012 100878 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS
64.99 GOLF-INTERNET SVC-NOV 00040357 218229 20121112 5110.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS GOLF CLUBHOUSE BUILDING
64.99
250378 12ISI2012 102507 COMPLETE COOLING SERVICES
1,135.61 STR-RECORE SWEEPER RADIATOR00041048 218098 17479 7630.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT STREET EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
1,135.61
250379 12I5/2012 119052 CUSTOM HOSE TECH INC
237.21 STR-MISC HYD FITTINGS 00049940 218301 67546 1630.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS STREET EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
21.26- UTIL-BALL VALVE HANDLE CREDIT 218302 66852 5390.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS SWR EQUIPNEHICLE MISC MNTC/RP
215.95 '
250380 12/5/2072 100139 DAKOTA COUNTY LICENSE CENTER
11.00 POL LICENSE #47 218230 20121205 1210.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS POLICE FIELD OPERATIONS/PATROL
11.00
250387 12I512012 100128 DAKOTA ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION
20.52 VALLEYWOOD RESERVOIR 218099 28762 5320.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC WATER WELUBOOSTER STN MNT/RPR
51.90 GALAXIE/FOUNDER LN SPRINKLER 218099 28762 1610.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC STREET/BOULEVARD REPAIR & MNTC �
53.63 LIFT STN STRM SWR GALAXIE 218099 28762 5385.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC SEWER STORM INFRASTRUCTURE
156.36 QUARRY POINT WATER TOWER 218099 28762 5320.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC WATER WELUBOOSTER STN MNT/RPR
276.41 GOLF MAINTENANCE BLDG 218099 28762 5145.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC GOLF SHOP BUILDING MAINTENANCE
954.95 STREET LIGHTS 218099 28762 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UT� °UND
, , �
R55CKREG �c.:�20000 CITYOFAPP. :�LEY 12/6 8:49:10
Council Check Register Page - 15
11/27/2012 —12/7/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanatian PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledge Account Description Business Unit
1,162.35 GOLF CLUBHSE/SEC LT 218099 28762 5110.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC GOLF CLUBHOUSE BUILDING
2,676.12
250382 1L5/2012 100434 DOUGHERTY MOLENDA SOLFEST HILL
23,547.00 POL LEGAL SERVICE - DEC 218231 66112721212 1055.6231 LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL PROSECUTING ATTORNEY
12,148.00 GEN LEGAL SERVICE - DEC 218232 66112731212 1050.6231 LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL C,ENERAL SERVICES
35,695.00
250383 12/5/2012 100151 EAGAN, CITY OF
9,977.45 SAN SEWER 4TH QUARTER 2012 218284 20121205 5365.6318 BURNSVILLE/EAGAN SWR REIMBURSESEWER MGMT/REPORTS/DATA ENTRY
9,977.45
250384 12I5/2012 143679 EGAN COMPANY
64,647.41 TRAFF SIGNAL IMP 157TH & PKNOB 218233 201114002 2027.6810 2011140G CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS ROAD ESCROW
64,647.41
250385 12I5/2012 100407 EMERGENCYAUTOMOTIVETECHNOLOG
1,760.17 POL-NEW CAR SET UP #904 00047575 218234 11201 1210.6211 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT POLICE FIELD OPERATIONSlPATROL
3,239.80 POL-NEW CAR SET UP #904 00047575 218234 11201 1210.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT POLICE FIELD OPERATIONS/PATROL
4,999.97
250386 12/5/2012 141365 EMPIRE FLOOR COVERING
1,110.00 CMF-REPL VINYL COMP TILE-WOMH1m051249 218100 1901 1540.6740 CAPITAL OUTLAY-MACH/EQ/OTHER CMF BUILDINGS & GROUNDS MNTC
1,807.50 CMF-REPL VINYL COMP TILE-MENS00051249 218101 1902 1540.6740 CAPITAL OUTLAY-MACH/EQ/OTHER CMF BUILDINGS & GROUNDS MNTC
5,862.50 CMF-REPL VINYL COMP TILE-KITCH00051249 218102 1900 1540.6740 CAPITAL OUTLAY-MACH/EQ/OTHER CMF BUILDINGS & GROUNDS MNTC
8,780.00
250387 72/5/2012 129789 GENERAL SECURITY SERVICES CORP
13.85 PKALARM MONITORING-RDWD-DEC 218235 277403 1730.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE
13.85
250388 12/512012 100570 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD
5,000.47 UTIL-METERS 00035250 218126 5798459 5310.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS WATER METER RPR/REPLACE/READNG
5,000.47
250389 12/5/2012 101796 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEM OF M
230.74 PK-BATTERY 218103 220016016 1765.6216 VEHICLES-TIRES/BATTERIES PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
101.48 UTIL-BATTERY 00042258 218127 220016327 5345.6216 VEHICLES-TIRES/BATTERIES WATER EQUIPNEHICLE/MISC MNTC
332.22
260390 72/5/2012 111243 JERRY'S TRANSMISSION SERVICE I
203.94 FIRE-PARTS #4983 218104 20243 7350.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS FIRE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
I
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OFAPPLE VALLEY 12/6/2012 8:49:10
Council Check Register Page - 16
11/27l2012 —12/7/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledge Account Description Business Unit
203.94
250397 12/SI2012 743037 JIM MURR PLUMBING, INC.
1,215.00 GOLF-PLBG FOR ADDL WATER LINES 218128 30042 5110.6266 REPAIRS-BUILDING GOLF CLUBHOUSE BUILDING
1,215.00
250392 72/6/2012 178232 JOHN DEERE FINANCIAL
69.11 PK-AIR RESTRICTOR INDICATOR 00035352 218272 P34825 1765.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
Supplier 100608 FRONTIER AG & TURF
69.11
250393 12/5/2012 700265 KENDRICK ELECTRIC
535.35 FIRE-ELECTRICAL WORKAFSt 00036476 218105 22424 1340.6266 REPAIRS-BUILDING FIRE BLDG 8 GROUNDS MNTC
535.35
250394 72/6/2072 143817 KEVIN CASEY, LLC
25,577.10 2012 POND CLEANOUTS 218236 201210701 5505.6269 2012107D REPAIRS-OTHER STORM DRAIN UTILITY
25,577.10
250395 12I5/2012 1437T9 KOENIG, MICHELLE
265.92 MISC DECOR FOR LS#1 REMODEL 00069859 218237 20121205 5000.1770 2012133G CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
265.92
260396 7215/2012 732646 KWIK KOPY BUSINESS SOLUTIONS
153.52 INSP-ELECTRICAL INSP LABELS 218106 12528 1400.6239 PRINTING INSPECTIONS MANAGEMENT
153.52
250397 1215/2012 101578 L3 COMMUNICATIONS MOBILE-VISIO
274.67 POL-VIDEO MIC PACKAGE 00067547 218107 1916681N 1210.6211 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT POLICE FIELD OPERATIONSlPATROL
274.67
250y98 12/5/2012 743160 LATOUR CONSTRUCTION INC
1,227.87- FLAGSTAFFAVE EXTENSION 218238 201110506 2027.6810 2011105G CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS ROAD ESCROW
.01- FLAGSTAFFAVE EXTENSION 218238 201110506 5385.6810 2011105G CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS SEWER STORM INFRASTRUCTURE
1,939.33 FLAGSTAFFAVE EXTENSION 218238 201110506 5360.6810 2011105G CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
103,259.50 FLAGSTAFFAVE EXTENSION 218238 201110506 2027.6810 2011105G CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS ROAD ESCROW
103,970.95
250399 72/5/2012 116377 LOFFLER '
24.63 HCSC COPIER MAINT 00050108 218239 1488500 1920.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT HAYES COMMUNITY & SENIOR CTR
I
24.63
CITY OF APP. .1LEY 12/6 8:49:10
R55CKREG Lvv20000
Council Check Register Page - 17
11/27/2012 -12/7/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explana PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledge Account Descrip6on Business Unit
250400 12/S/2072 100294 MAIL PACK 8� SHIP
11.85 FIRE-SHIP TO JERRY'S TRANS SVC 00068349 218108 AV028 1350.6238 POSTAGE/UPS/FEDEX FIRE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
10.52 FIRE-SHIP TO JERRY'S TRANS SVC 00070705 218109 2585 1350.6238 POSTAGE/UPS/FEDEX FIRE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
22.67
260401 12/6I2012 101433 MARTIN-MCALLISTER
800.00 POL-PERSONNEL EVALUATION 218110 APP001 1200.6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES POLICE MANAGEMENT
800.00
250402 12/5/2012 100849 METRO VOLLEYBALL OFPICIALS ASS
171.00 REC-VBALL OFFICIAL FEES 10/23 00043278 218129 4182 1860.6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES REC VOLLEYBALL
142.50 REC-VBALL OFFICIAL FEES 10/30 00043278 218130 4190 1860.6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES REC VOLLEYBALL
171.00 REC-VBALL OFFICIAL FEES 11/13 D0043278 218131 4203 1860.6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES REC VOLLEYBALL
57.00 REC-VBALL OFFICIAL FEES 11/20 00043278 218132 4211 1860.6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES REC VOLLEYBALL
541.50
250403 12/6/2012 147669 MIDWEST ELECTRICAL TECHNOLOGIE
5,811.23 INSP-ELECTRICAL INSPECT FEES 218119 20121130 1445.6243 ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES INSPECTIONS ELECTRICAL
5,811.23
250404 72/512012 114547 MIDWEST OVERHEAD CRANE
263.40 UTIL-ANNUAL HOIST INSP 218240 730231N 5325.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT WATER TREATMENT FCLTY MNTC/RPR
395.35 PK-ANNUAL HOIST INSP 218240 730231N 1765.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
658.75
250405 12/5/2072 142014 MUSIC TOGETHER IN THE VALLEY I '
1,41320 REGFALL SESSION CLASSES 218133 20121119 1845.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES REC SELF SUPPORT PROG GENERAL I
1,413.20 I
250406 12I5/2012 143781 NARATE JUDIE KEYS ��
250.00 REC-POETRY JAM 2� TEEN CENT�070148 218134 20121114 1840.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES REC TEEN PROGRAMS I
250.00 I
250407 72/5/2072 700712 NORTHWEST CHAPTER FBINAA I
80.00 POL 2013 DUES-RECHTZIGEL 218241 20121205 1000.1560 PREPAID EXPENSES GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
80.00
250408 7215/2012 110957 O'REILLYAUTOMOTIVE INC I
13.31 POL-WIPER BLADES 00048564 218327 3245411150 1210.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS POLICE FIELD OPERATIONS/PATROL
28.79 ENG-WINTER WIPER BLADES #113 00048564 218328 3245411161 1510.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS PW ENC�INEERING & TECHNICAL
141.03 POL-WIPER BLADES, FUSES 00048564 218329 3245409980 1210.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS POLICE FIELD OPERATIONS/PATROL
17.07 SHOP-HOSE CLAMP 00048564 218330 3245409701 1530.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS CMF SHOP EQUIP MNTC & REPAIR
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12/6/2012 8:49:10
Council Check Register Page - 18
11/27/2012 -12/7/2012
Check # Data Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
69.89 POL-DISC BRAKE PADS 00048564 216331 3245409959 1210.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS POLICE FIELD OPERATIONS/PATROL
41.72 STR-BULB,'PRIMARY VNRE, FUSE 00048564 218332 3245412591 1630.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS STREET EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
12.26 STR-RUST PREVENTER 00048564 218333 3245412896 1630.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS STREET EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE I
46.92 FIRE-SEAFOAM FUELTREATMENT 00048564 218334 3245414768 1350.6212 MOTOR FUELS/OILS FIRE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
46.92 UTIL-SEAFORM FUELTREATMENT 00048564 218335 3245414768 5345.6212 MOTOR FUEIS/OILS WATER EQUIPNEHICLE/MISC MNTC
7.77- SHOP-DISCOUNT 00048564 218336 1530.6333 GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS CMF SHOP EQUIP MNTC & REPAIR
410.14
250409 12/5/2012 131227 PALOMINO PET HOSPITAL
1,618.08 POL-IMPOUND FEES OCT 218242 39219 1295.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES COMMUN SERVICE OFFICERS (CSO)
1,618.08 '
250410 12/5/2012 143336 PREMIER LOCATING INC
218.00 SL-ELECTRIC LOCATES 00051167 218136 34726 5805.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND
218.00
260411 12/512012 100673 RED WING SHOE STORE
148.74 UTIL-BOOTS-MCWILLIAMS 00045232 218111 7240000004250 5365.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHINGALLOWANCE SEWER MGMT/REPORTS/DATAENTRY
148.74
250412 72/5/2012 101979 RYAN ELECTRIC INC
309.67 PK-REPI BREAKER KELLY PK GAZE�D046096 218112 23666 1730.6266 REPAIRS-BUILDING PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE
309.84 PK-RPR LIGHTS GALAXIE PK 00046096 218243 23667 1725.6269 REPAIRS-OTHER PARK ICE RINK MAINTENANCE
309.84 PK-RPR LIGHTS GALAXIE PK 00046096 218243 23667 1720.6269 REPAIRS-OTHER PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE
929.35
2b0413 12/5/2012 132466 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT
15.12 GOLF KITCHEN POP 218287 4409 5120.6421 GOLF-NON ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES GOLF KITCHEN
90.01 GOLF BAGGIES, TRASH CAN, MISC 218288 4408 5120.6422 GOLF-KITCHEN SUPPLIES GOLF KITCHEN
5.28- 218288 4408 5100.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT GOLF FUND BALANCE SHEET
154.47 GOLF KITCHEN FOOD 218289 4408 5120.6420 GOLF-FOOD GOLF KITCHEN
71.88 GOLF COFFEE 218290 4408 5145.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF SHOP BUILDING MAINTENANCE
117.03 WELNESS LIFE SNACKS 218291 8888 7203.6398 LIFE SNACKS CITY WELLNESS PROGRAM
112.70 REC PIZZA, MISC FOOD TC RESALE 218292 7631 1840.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE REC TEEN PROGRAMS
160.96 WELLNESS LIFE SNACKS 218293 6849 7203.6398 LIFE SNACKS CITY WELLNESS PROGRAM
716.89
I
250414 12/512012 700432 SEH ENGINEERS
1,663.75 TRAFFIC SIGNAL 157TH/PILOT KNO 218294 262064 2027.6235 2011140G CONSULTANT SERVICES ROAD ESCROW
1,431.52 LOOP DETECTOR PLANS 218295 262510 2027.6235 2012101R CONSULTANT SERVICES ROAD ESCROW
200.23 FLAGSTAFF AVE LIGHTING 218296 262510 4703.6235 2011105G CONSULTANT SERVICES FLAGSTAFF EXTENSION
931.46 TRAFFIC SERVICES 218297 262510 '' 4703.6235 2011105G CONSULTANT SERVICES FLAGSTAFF EXTEN"
R55CKREG Cv�20000 CITYOFAPP. ,LLEY 12/6. 8:49:10
Council Check Register Page - 19
11/27/2012 —12/7/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
4,226.96
250415 12/5/2012 100829 SHAMROCK GROUP INC
65.19 GOLF-RENTAL CO2 SYSTEM NOV 00051254 218113 1630687 5120.6310 RENTAL EXPENSE GOLF KITCHEN
65.19
250416 12/5/2012 111761 SHRED IT USA MINNEAPOLIS
73.45 POL SHREDDING SVC-NOV 00043065 218217 9401123818 1250.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVPOLICE FACILITY
73.45
250417 72/6/2012 100447 SOUTH RIVER HEATING & COOLING
505.10 fIRE-SCHED RPR & MAINTAFSI 00035271 218114 1215949 1340.6266 REPAIRS-BUILDING FIRE BLDG & GROUNDS MNTC
505.10
250418 12I5I2072 142745 TARGET BANK
13.78 HCSC POWERADE, HALLOWEEN C/'Q0D'SS555 218298 6430766642 1920.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES HAYES COMMUNITY & SENIOR CTR
16.65 POL CONTAINERS 00067473 218299 6430712270 1210.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE FIELD OPERATIONS/PATROL
4.17 POL CONTAINERS 00069524 218300 6431220942 1210.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE FIELD OPERATIONS/PATROL
34.60
250419 12/b/2012 142499 TITAN MACHINERY
1,485.54 PK-SPROCKET/SHAFT/CUTTING ED�50728 218115 137034PC 1765.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
1,485.54
250420 12ISI2072 100489 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
30.95 POL-INSIGNIAlNAME BAR 00058644 218116 58644 1200.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHINGALLOWANCE POLICE MANAGEMENT
30.95
250421 12I512072 142869 UNITED BICYCLE SUPPLY I �
226.75 POL-BICYCLE PARTS 00067546 218137 SH28332 1210.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS POLICE FIELD OPERATIONS/PATROL I
22675 I i
250422 12I5/2012 143395 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA EXTENS
95.00 UNDERGROUND STRMWTR TRMT-BYRON 218262 20121205 1000.1560 PREPAID EXPENSES GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET i
95.00
250423 12/5/2012 124726 US BANK
113.22 HR-ADM FEES 00069922 218117 7812324 1020.6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES '
110,95 HR-FEES FOR MAY-JUNf 2012 00069922 218118 7668486 1020.6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES
224.17 I
250424 1215I2012 140982 WILD BILL'S '
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12/6/2012 8:49:10
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register Page - 2U �
11/27/2012 —12/7/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
1,000.00 REC GIFT CERTS-SOFTBALL LEAGUE 218263 20121205 1850.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REC SOFTBALL
1, 000.00
250425 72/6I2072 700296 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MIN - BEER INC I
188.00 GOLF-KTN BEER 00011037 218264 987974 5120.6419 GOLF-BEER GOLF KITCHEN �
i
188.00 I
250426 12/6@012 113065 YAHOOI
40.00 POL-ADM SUBPOENA RESPONSE 00070459 218138 211844 1215.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES POLICE DETECTIVE UNIT I
40.00 ��
250427 12I512012 738032 YELLOW BOOK WEST �
180.50 GOLF-SOUTH METROAD 00050219 218265 20121103 5105.6239 PRINTING GOLF MANAGEMENT
180.50
20121142 11/30I2012 101348 DEPOSITORY TRUST COMPANY
705,000.00 PRINC GO REFUND PARK BOND 2004 218303 3062.6910 BOND PRINCIPAL BONDS OF 1997, $8,370,000
745,000.00 CALLED GO REFUND PARK BOND 200 218304 3062.6910 BOND PRINCIPAL BONDS OF 1997, $8,370,000
785,000.00 CALLED GO REFUND PARK BOND 200 218305 3062.6910 BOND PRINCIPAL BONDS OF 1997, $8,370,000
930,000.00 CALLED GO REFUND PARK BOND 200 218306 3062.6910 BOND PRINCIPAL BONDS OF 1997, $8,370,000
960,000.00 CALLED GO REFUND PARK BOND 200 218307 3062.6910 BOND PRINCIPAL BONDS OF 1997, $8,370,000
965,000.00 CALLED GO REFUND PARK BOND 200 218308 3062.6910 BOND PRINCIPAL BONDS OF 1997, $8,370,000 i
50,0OO.OD PRINC CEMETERY BOND 2004 218309 3067.6910 BOND PRINCIPAL BONDS OF 1997, $795,000
55,000.00 CALLED CEMETERY BOND 2004 218310 3067.6910 BOND PRINCIPAL BONDS OF 1997, $795,000
60,000.00 CALLED CEMETERY BOND 2004 218311 3067.6910 BOND PRINCIPAL BONDS OF 1997, $795,000
70,000.00 CALLED CEMETERY BOND 2004 218312 3067.6910 BOND PRINCIPAL BONDS OF 1997, $795,000
75,000.00 CALLED CEMETERY BOND 2004 218313 3067.6910 BOND PRINCIPAL BONDS OF 1997, $795,000 I
75,000.00 CALLED CEMETERY BOND 2004 218314 3067.6910 BOND PRINCIPAL BONDS OF 1997, $795,000
95,000.00 PRINC GO REFUND BOND 2004 218315 3192.6910 BOND PRINCIPAL REF BONDS OF 2004, $565,000
120,000.00 PRINC GO REFUND BOND 2002 278316 5402.6910 BOND PRINCIPAL WATER/SEWER CONNECTION CHARGE I
5,690,000.00
20121143 71127/2012 100873 HEALTHPARTNERS
3,953.53 DENTAL CLAIMS 11/15-11/21/12 218354 20121121 7105.6146 DENTAL INSURANCE INSURANCE TRUST DENTAL
3,953.53
20127201 12/312012 701348 DEPOSITORY TRUST COMPANY I
105,000.00 PRINC RECREAREV REFUND 2004 218317 5260.6910 BOND PRINCIPAL ARENA2 MANAGEMENT-HAYES I
105,000.00
20121202 12I7/2012 100038 APPLE VALLEY FIREFIGHTERS
13.99 FIRE RELIEF DUES 218244 1204121529181i 1 9000.2,120 ACCRUED BENEFIT LIABILITY PAYROLL CLEARW( SHEET
CITY OF APF :LLEY 12/E 8:49:10
R55CKREG w.�20000 '' ,
Councii Check Register pa9e - 2 � '!
11/27/2012 —12J7/Y012 �
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
13.99 '
20121203 12RI2072 130957 GENESIS EMPLOYEE BENEFITS INC I
6,329.20 FLEX SPENDING DAYCARE - 2012 218323 121201 O 9000.2119 ACCRUED FLEX SPENDING PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
6, 329.20
20127204 12/7I2012 726459 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS -
380.00 PLAN #705481 ROTH IRA 218250 12041215291815 9000.2120 ACCRUED BENEFIT LIABILITY PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET I
380.00
20121205 121T/2012 729553 US BANK
2,957.82 HSA FUNDINGEMPLOYEE 218251 12041215291816 9000.2125 ACCRUED HSA/HRA BENEFIT PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
2,957.82 �
20127206 1217@072 129576 US BANK
240.72 SERGEANT PEHRA FUNDINGGROSS W 218252 12041215291817 9000.2120 ACCRUED BENEFIT LIABILITY PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
164.37 SERGEANT PEHRA FUNDING-ANNUAL 218252 12041215291817 9000.2120 ACCRUED BENEFIT LIABILITY PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
1,162.09 POLICE PEHRA FUNDING-GROSS WAG 218252 12041215291817 9000.2120 ACCRUED BENEFIT LIABILITY PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
301.68 POLICE PEHRA FUNDING-ANNUAL LE 218252 12041215291817 9000.2120 ACCRUED BENEFIT LIABILITY PAYROL� CLEARING BAL SHEET
543.55 POLICE PEHRA FUNDING-COMP 218252 12041215291817 9000.2120 ACCRUED BENEFIT LIABILITY PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
2,412.41
20121207 12I7/2012 100240 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS -
29,200.64 PLAN #301171 FULL-TIME ICMA 218254 1204121529182 9000.2120 ACCRUED BENEFIT LIABILITY PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
29,200.64
20721248 12RI2012 700392 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENTAS
37,829.41 EMPLOYEE SHARE PERA 218256 1204121529184 9000.2114 ACCRUED PERA PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
49,420.15 CITY SHARE PERA 218256 1204121529184 9000.2114 ACCRUED PERA PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
87,249.56
20721209 1217I2012 100455 APFINITY PWS FEDERAL CREDIT U I
2,277.10 CREDIT UNION DEDUCT 218257 1204121529185 90002120 ACCRUED BENEFIT LIABILITY PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
2,277.10 I
20121210 12R/2012 701238 MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PAYMEN �
228.42 CHILD SUPPORT 218245 12041215291810 9000.2120 ACCRUED BENEFIT LIABILITY PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
415.32 CHILD SUPPORT 218246 12041215291811 9000.2120 ACCRUED BENEFIT LIABILITY PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
298.78 CHILD SUPPORT 218259 1204121529187 9000.2120 ACCRUED BENEFIT LIABILITY PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
171.97 CHILD SUPPORT 218260 1204121529188 9000.2120 ACCRUED BENEFIT LIABILITY PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
24.45 CHILD SUPPORT 218261 1204121529189 9000.2120 ACCRUED BENEPIT LIABILITY PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
1,138.94 '
i
I
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OFAPPLE VALLEY 12/6/2012 B:49:10 I
Council Check Register Pa9e - ZZ i
11/27/2012 —12/7/2012
Check # Date Amount Suppiier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
6,307,176.17 Grand Total ` Payment Instrument Totals I
�e� CheckTotal 351,885.18 I
� _ / TrensferTotal 5,930,913.19
V
�
� Pay ModeX Total 24,377.80
,1�.�` Total Payments 6,307,176.17
i
I
�
I
I
. . . .
CITY OF APP� , .�LEY 12/6. '8:50:04
R55CKSUM LO�z0000
Council Check Summary Page - 1
11/27/2012 - 12/7/2012
Company Amount
01000 GENERAL FUND 105,320.12
02025 ROAD ESCROW FUND 169,774.31
02070 REFORESTATION FUND 3,537.18
03060 PARK BOND 1997, $8,370,000 5,090,000.00
03065 CEMETERY BOND 1997, $795,000 385,000.00
03190 REF STATE AID 2004, $565,000 95,000.00
04700 TIF DIST#13-CAPITAL PROJECTS 1,131.69
05000 LIQUOR FUND 14,397.75
05100 GOLF FUND 4,514.57
05200 ARENAFUND 105,000.00
05300 WATER & SEWER FUND 46,789.35
05400 WATER/SEWER CONNECTION CHG FUN 120,000.00
05500 STORM DRAINAGE UTILITY FUND 25,577.10
05600 CEMETERY FUND LEVEL PROGRAM 694.47
05800 STREET LIGHT UTIL FUND 1,172.95
07100 INSURANCE TRUST DENTAL FUND 3,953.53
07200 RISK MANAGEMENT/INSURANCE FUND 277•99
09000 PAYROLLCLEARING FUND 135,035.16
ReportTotais 6,307,176.17
R55CKREG e.vv20000 CITYOFAPF. ,LLEY 12/'� t0:01:10
Council Check Register Page - 1
12/3/2012 -12/14/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledge Account Description Business Unit
7553 12/14/2012 137610 A H HERMEL COMPANY
131.14 TAX#1 00050148 218693 335758 5015.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
656.80 NOTAX#1 00050148 218693 335758 5015.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
787.94 �
1654 12/1412012 100037 APPLE VALLEY COLLISION INC I
892.23 UTIL-RPR DAMAGE F/BUMPER #406 218358 35254 7205.6399 OTHER CHARGES RISK MANAGEMENTS/INSURANCE '
892.23
1555 12l1412072 100360 ARCTIC GLACIER INC �
38.82 NO TAX#1 00002202 218569 436231103 5075.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
68.64 NO TAX#1 00002202 218570 462231807 5015.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
45.76 NO TAX#1 00002202 218571 438232504 5015.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES �
70.94 NO TAX#1 00002202 218572 462233510 5015.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
6.10. NO TAX#1 00002202 218573 462233511 5015.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
61.68 NO TAX#2 00002202 218574 437230713 5055.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES I,
54.84 NO TAX#2 00002202 218575 462231804 5055.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
36.56 NO TAX#2 00002202 218576 438232502 5055.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
52.60 NO TAX#2 00002202 218577 461233303 5055.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES �I
84.74 NO TAX#3 00002202 218578 460231206 5085.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES I
75.48 NO TAX#3 00002202 218579 438232606 5085.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES I
583.96
1556 72114/2012 100071 BOYER TRUCKS
351.15 PK-BRAKE DRUM FOR #240 00035173 218359 693954 1765.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
351.15
7557 72174/2012 100828 BREUER,SCOTTA
1,389.43 ATHL BUS. CONF-BREUER NEW ORLE 218564 20121202 1705.6276 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP OTHERPARK & RECREATION MGMT TRAING
1,389.43
7568 72174l2012 101270 BROWNELLS INC
290.22 POL-AMMO 00069529 218754 8102943 1210.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE FIELD OPERATIONS/PATROL
15,67_ 00069529 218754 8102943 1000.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
271.55
1559 12/74I2012 100102 COLLEGE CITY BEVERAGE
579.75 BEER#1 00000114 218694 360212 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
66.00- CMBEER#1 00000114 218695 130356 5015.6530 BEER UQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES ,
14,129.25 BEER#1 00000114 218696 360245 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES I
162.00 TAX#1 00000114 218697 360280 5015.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESAIE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES '
9,341.45 BEER#1 00000114 218697 360280 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES I
i
RSSCKREG LOG20000 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12/13/20120:01:10 I
Council Check Register Pa9e' 2 I
12/3/2012 -12/14/2012
' I
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Expianation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit '
158.40- CMBEER#1 00000114 218698 1153 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES I
733.20 BEER#1 00000114 218699 360319 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES I
387.00 BEER#2 00000114 218700 360217 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
35.30 TAX#2 00000114 218701 360248 5055.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
4,871.35 BEER#2 00000114 218701 360248 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
10.91- CMBEER#2 00000114 278702 1051 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
17.65 TAX#2 00000114 218703 360282 5055.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
2,565.90 BEER#2 00000114 218703 360282 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
643.75 BEER#3 00000114 218704 360221 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
81.15 TAX#3 00000114 218705 360250 5085.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
3,494.10 BEER#3 00000114 218705 360250 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
6,536.75 BEER#3 00000114 218706 360285 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
169.00 BEER#3 00000114 218707 360293 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
43,512.29
7560 12/74/2012 107329 CUMMINS NPOWER LLC
102.59 FIRE-MUFFLER/CLAMPS/TUBE/GASH6069200 218757 10034535 1350.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS FIRE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
102.59
1567 12114/2012 100133 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO
22.40 TAX#1 00000115 218708 675082 5015.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
4,579.45 BEER#1 00000115 218708 675082 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
1,914.60 BEER#1 00000115 218709 676007 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR i�1 STOCK PURCHASES
15.00 TAX#1 00000115 218710 676993 5015.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
2,364.26 BEER#1 00000115 218710 676993 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
2,182.90 BEER#1 00000115 218711 31 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
21.50 TAX#1 00000115 218712 678822 5015.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
1,826.80 BEER#1 00000115 218712 678822 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
1,698.95 BEER#2 00000115 218713 675081 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
684.85 BEER#2 00000115 218714 676014 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
22.40 TAX#2 00000115 218715 676992 5055.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES !
2,482.70 BEER#2 00000115 218715 676992 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
277.80 BEER#2 00000115 218716 677905 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
1,813.95 BEER#2 00000115 218717 678821 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
1,281.00 BEER#3 00000115 218718 675084 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
21.50 TAX#3 00000115 218719 676011 5085.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
807.05 BEER#3 00000115 218719 676011 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
21.50 TAX#3 00000115 218720 676998 5085.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
1,867.95 BEER#3 00000115 218720 676998 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES I
22.40 TAX#3 00000115 218721 677911 5085.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES I
1,042.15 BEER#3 00000115 218721 677911 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
I
I
CITY OF APF: .i.LEY 12/1 :0:01:10
R55CKREG Lvv20000 `
Council Check Register Page - 3
12/3/2012 - 12/14l2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
1,917.95 BEER#3 00000115 218722 678827 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
26,889.06
7562 12I74I2012 738812 DIMENSIONAL GROUP, THE
9,639.59 REG2013 CITY NEWS WINTER 218755 INV00034381 1700.6239 PRINTING PARK & RECREATION MANAGEMENT
9,639.59
1663 12/74I2012 777768 DRAIN PRO PLUMBING
175.00 CH-RPR HOT WATER PIPE LEAK 00068235 218360 34983 1060.6266 REPAIRS-BUILDING MUNICIPAL BLDG & GROUNDS MNTC
175.00
1664 12/14I2012 101365 ECM PUBLISHERS INC
31.50 LEGALAD CHICK-FIL-A 218562 392124 4902:6239 PRINTING PHYSICAL IMPROVEMENTS ESCROW
31.50 LEGALAD-ORD 937 218563 392182 1015.6239 PRINTING CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS
63.00
1566 12/1M2012 713647 ESS BROTHERS 8 SONS INC
747.59 UTIL-EXTERNAL INFI-SHIELD SEAL 218415 RR7213 5380.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES SEWER LIFT STN REPAIR & MNTC
747.59 WQ-EXTERNAL INFI-SHIELD SEAL 218415 RR7213 5505.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES STORM DRAIN UTILITY
1,495.18
7566 12114/2012 179126 EXTREME BEVERAGES LLC
94.50 TAX#1 00043761 218580 W646231 5015.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESAIE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
135.00 TAX#1 00043761 218581 W654000 5015.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
158.00 TAX#1 00043761 218582 W658302 5015.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
31.50 TAX#2 00043761 218583 726970 5055.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
181.00 TAX#2 00043761 218584 W650044 5055.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
186.50 TAX#2 00043761 218585 W658303 5055.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
31.50 TAX#3 00043761 218586 W650045 5085.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
818.00
7567 12114/2012 100282 G 8� K SERVICES
17.78 AVCC-RUGS NOV 00046765 218548 1182241040 1900.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVAV COMMUNITY CENTER
6.60 LIQ1-RUGS NOV 00046894 218549 1182216640 5025.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVLIQUOR #1 OPERATIONS
6.60 LIQ1-RUGS NOV 00046894 218550 1182238808 5025.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVLIQUOR #1 OPERATIONS
29.16 LIQ3-RUGS NOV 00046894 218551 1182209637 5095.6240 CLEANING SERVICElGARBAGE REMOVLIQUOR #3 OPERATIONS
34.29 LIQ3-RUGS NOV 00046894 218552 1182254062 5095.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVLIQUOR #3 OPERATIONS
27.70 CH-RUGS NOV 00046896 218553 1182227735 1060.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVMUNICIPAL BLDG & GROUNDS MNTC
27.70 CH-RUGS NOV 00046896 218554 1182249880 1060.6240 CLEANING SERVICElGARBAGE REMOVMUNICIPAL BLDG & GROUNDS MNTC
7.70 CH-RUGS NOV 00046896 218555 1182227734 1060.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVMUNICIPAL BLDG & GROUNDS MNTC
7.70 CH-RUGS NOV 00046896 218556 1182249879 1060.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVMUNICIPAL BLDG & GROUNDS MNTC
7.70 CH-RUGS NOV 00046896 218557 1182242935 1060.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVMUNICIPAL BLDG & GROUNDS MNTC
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12/13/20130:01:10
Council Check Register Page - 4
12/3/2012 -12/14/2012
Check # D�te Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
7.70 CH-RUGS NOV 00046896 218558 1182220772 1060.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVMUNICIPAL BLDG & GROUNDS MNTC
40.70 CMF-RUGS NOV 00046896 218559 1182229974 1540.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVCMF BUILDINGS & GROUNDS MNTC
40.70 CMF-RUGS NOV 00046896 218560 1182207733 1540.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVCMF BUILDINGS 8 GROUNDS MNTC
44.80 CMF-RUGS NOV 00046896 218561 1182252162 1540.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVCMF BUILDINGS & GROUNDS MNTC I
' 306.83
1568 72/74/2012 102235 GOPHER SIGN CO
1,004.06 STR NAME SIGNS FOR 2012 MAINT 00047837 218361 89168 1680.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES TRAFFIC SIGNS/SIGNALS/MARKERS
1, 004.06
1569 12/14I2012 100217 GRAINGER
292.41 UTIL-CHLORINE CARTRIDGE 00069618 218362 9010604487 5325.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT FCLTY MNTC/RPR
292.41
1570 12H 4/2012 101794 I N FRATEC H
2,099.03 UTIL-PARKER PREDATOR HOSE 218363 1200608 5390.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS SWR EQUIPNEHICLE MISC MNTC/RP
2,099.03
1677 12I14I2012 100348 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO
41.91 PK-HOSE, O RINGS 00035349 218416 88118800 1765.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
74.15 PK-O RINGS 00035349 218417 88118801 1765.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
144.22 PK-SPACER, ROLLER SHAFT SCREat8135349 218418 88164400 1765.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
200.28
1572 72I1412012 717219 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC
30.78 FIRE-HALOGEN BULBS 00069197 218756 32054 1350.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS FIRE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
30.78
1573 72114I2012 103074 PADGETT, MARCIE D
53.68 REC-MILEAGE NOV PADGETT 218368 20121129 1700.6277 MILEAGE/AUTO A�LOWANCE PARK & RECREATION MANAGEMENT
35.33 REC PROGRAM SUPPLIES 218566 20120911 1875.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REC PRESCHOOL PROGRAMS
71.71 REC PROGRAM SUPPLIES 218567 20120911 1845.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REC SELF SUPPORT PROG GENERAL '
17.20 REC CLEAN SANTA SUIT 218568 20120911 1800.6399 OTHER CHARGES REC PROGRAM GENERAL
177.92
7574 1217M2012 700600 RIGID HITCH INC
167.73 SHOP-PINTLE HOOK/COMB PINTLE00035199 218758 141017801 1530.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS CMF SHOP EQUIP MNTC 8 REPAIR
167.73
1575 72H4/2012 700437 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO
67.83- PK SALES TAX 00035354 218604 15818CB 1725.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ICE RINK MAINTENANCE
67.84 PK SALES TAX 00035354 218605 73235 ` 1725.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ICE RINK MA' 'ANCE
RSSCKREG LvG20000 CITYOFAPP� .�LEY 12/1 0:01:10
Councii Check Register Page - 5
12l3/2012 -12/14/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
213.20 CMF PAINT/SUPPLIES 00070701 218606 46530 1540.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES CMF BUILDINGS & GROUNDS MNTC
14.30 CMF PAINT/SUPPLIES 00070701 218607 46159 1540.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES CMF BUILDINGS & GROUNDS MNTC
97.91 PK MARKING PAINT FOR VW RACE 00035354 218608 69423 1720.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE
188.42 PK STAIN FOR RINKS 00035354 218609 41010 1725.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ICE RINK MAINTENANCE
513.84
1576 7211M2012 100471 TOLL GAS 8� WELDING SUPPLY
134.25 STR-SUPERARC WIRE 00070651 218759 118780 1630.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
134.25
7577 12174I2012 120784 ULINE
61.99 POL-LASER LITE EAR PLUGS 00067549 218364 47799505 1215.6211 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT POLICE DETECTIVE UNIT
61.99
1578 12/14/2012 101123 USA BLUE BOOK
338.32 UTIL-FOOD GRADE GREASE 00069617 218365 828555 5330.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES WTR MAIN/HYDRANT/CURB STOP MNT
338.32
1679 12I74I2012 721767 VARNER TRANSPORTATION I�
949.20 FREIGHT #1 00045995 218587 26116 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES �
315.00 FREIGHT#1 00045995 218588 26180 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
408.45 FREIGHT#1 00045995 218589 26192 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
117.60 FREIGHT#1 00045995 218590 26136 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES i
422.10 FREIGHT#1 00045995 216591 25228 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES ,
282.45 FREIGHT#2 00045995 218592 26168 5055.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES I
80.85 FREIGHTtk2 00045995 218593 26181 5055.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES i
136.50 FREIGHT#2 00045995 218594 26193 5055.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
11.55 FREIGHT#2 00045995 218595 26137 5055.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
168.00 FRE�GHT#2 00045995 218596 25229 5055.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES I
775.95 FREIGHT#3 00045995 278597 26169 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES �
170.10 FREIGHT#3 00045995 218598 26182 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
288.75 FREIGHT#3 00045995 218599 P6194 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
68.25 FREIGHT#3 00045995 218600 26138 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
365.40 FREIGHT#3 00045995 218601 25230 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
4,560.15
1580 72H4/2012 119521 WILSKE, JOSHUA J
5.21 IT-MILEAGE NOV WILSKE 218366 20121130 1030.6277 MILEAGE/AUTOALLOWANCE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
5.21
1581 12/1M2012 700363 XCEL ENERGY
161.49 SL UGHTS ELECTRIC 218565 449406621 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND
I
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12/13/20120:01:10 �
Council Check Register Page - 6
12/3/2012 -12/14/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account DescripHon Business Unit
161.49
1582 7217412012 138342 YOCUM OIL COMPANY INC
9,769.22 DIESEL FUEL 00050328 218367 527347 1000.1520 INVENTORY-SUPPLIES GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
237.39 GOLF-DIESEL 00051106 218419 522628 5155.6212 MOTOR FUELS/OILS GOLF EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
478.65 GOLF-SUPER 87 00051106 218420 522627 5155.6212 MOTOR FUELS/OILS GOLF EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
10,485.26 I
2b0428 12/612072 142599 HAYDEN, TERRY
400.00 OAKWILT SUPPRES COST SHR PROG 218171 75309 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES
400.00
250534 1211212012 143665 BANK OF AMERICA
48.39 REF OVPMT UTIL-8444 144TH ST W 218460 20121206 5301.4997 WATER/SEWER ACCT REFUNDS WATER & SEWER FUND REVENUE
48.39
25053b 72/12/2012 101640 EDINA REALTY TITLE
133.80 REF OVPMT UTIL-6234 157TH ST W 218461 20121206 5301.4997 WATER/SEWER ACCT REFUNDS WATER & SEWER FUND REVENUE
133.80
250536 12H212012 121616 Kq KOUNGSOOK
175.00 REF OVPMT UTIL-13354 HUMMINGBI 218462 20121206 5301.4997 WATER/SEWER ACCT REFUNDS WATER & SEWER FUND REVENUE
175.00
250537 72172/2012 143825 KUSSKE, STEVE
108.36 REF OVPMT UTIL-14266 GLENCOVE 218463 20121206 5301.4997 WATER/SEWER ACCT REFUNDS WATER & SEWER FUND REVENUE
108.36
250538 12H2/2012 138336 BERNICK'S BEVERAGE
128.00 TAX#1 00050356 218615 29175 5015.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
165.55 BEER#1 00050356 218616 29176 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
48.47- CMBEER#1 00050356 218617 29177 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
165.55 BEER#3 00050356 218618 28763 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
410.63
250539 12I12/2072 143123 BOOM ISLAND BREWING COMPANY, L
564.00 BEER#3 00051132 218619 522 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
564.00 �
250640 12/12/2012 717468 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO
320.50 BEER #1 00042951 218620 486989 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
727.42 BEER #1 00042951 218621 487427 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK' HASES I
CITY OF APP� �LEY 12/1 0:01:10
RSSCKREG L..o20000
Council Check Register Page - 7
12/3/2012 -12/14/2012
Check # Date Amaunt Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subiedger Account Description Business Unit
218.94 BEER #1 00042951 218622 487726 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
573.00 BEER #3 00042951 218623 486674 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
1,076.88 BEER #3 00042951 218624 487431 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
2,916.74
250541 12112I2012 143314 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE CO
592.45 BEER#3 00051160 218625 2092 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
592.45
250542 12112I2072 100314 COCA-COLA REFRESHMENTS USA, IN
424.50 TAX#1 00000122 218626 128446709 5015.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
273.60 TAX#2 00000122 218627 198451014 5055.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
276.10 TAX#2 00000122 218628 198452315 5055.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
326.80 TAX#3 00000122 218629 128447011 5085.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE IIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
1,301.00 '
250543 72/72/2012 100237 HOHENSTEINS INC
180.00 BEER#1 00005574 218630 623246 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
1,127.25 BEER#1 00005574 218631 626046 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES I
1,608.40 BEER#1 00005574 218632 625592 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
624.75 BEER#2 00005574 218633 624047 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
533.50 BEER#2 00005574 218634 625593 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
180.00 BEER#3 00005574 218635 623247 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
1,473.50 BEER#3 00005574 218636 624048 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
186.00 BEER#3 00005574 218637 625164 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
1,335.00 BEER#3 00005574 218638 625642 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
28.00 TAX#3 00005574 218639 625642 5085.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
7,276.40
250544 72H212012 100374 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY
390.70 TAX#1 00002171 218640 15945345 5015.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
176.40 TAX#2 00002171 218641 15945366 5055.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
461.60 TAX#3 00002171 218642 15945355 5085.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
1,028.70
250545 12H2I2012 125174 SURLY BREWING CO
1,596.00 BEER#1 00047806 218643 454 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
915.00 BEER#1 00047806 218644 495 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
1,029.00 BEER#2 00047806 218645 451 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
1,478.00 BEER#3 00047806 218646 450 5085.6530 BEER LIIIUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES i
1,314.00 BEER#3 00047806 218647 496 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES i
6, 332.00 I
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF APPLE VALIEY 12/13/20120:01:10
Council Check Register Pa9e " 8
12/3/2012 -12/14/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
250546 1211212012 100296 WIRT2 BEVERAGE MIN - BEER INC
1,914.20 BEER#1 00000105 218648 977357 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
1,830.25 BEER#1 00000105 218649 978368 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
288.00 BEER#1 00000105 218650 978370 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
361.00 BEER#1 00000105 218651 978369 5015.6530 6EER �IQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES i
1,722.96 BEER#1 00000105 218652 980358 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES i
4,639.12 BEER#1 00000105 218653 981429 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
1,135.25 BEER#1 00000105 218654 985559 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
72.00 BEER#1 00000105 218655 983561 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
8,005.20 BEERlk1 00000105 218656 985069 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
216.00 BEER#1 00000105 218657 985070 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
1,411.31 BEER#1 00000105 218658 987138 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
72.00 BEER#1 00000105 218659 987140 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
5,637.85 BEER#1 00000105 278660 987458 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
288.00 BEER#1 00000105 218661 987460 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
30.01 BEER#1 00000105 218662 987459 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
721.77 BEER#1 00000105 218663 9894432 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
37.50 TAX#1 00000105 218664 977358 5015.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
67.10 TAX#1 00000105 218665 983560 5015.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
78.00 TAX#1 00000105 218666 987139 5015.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
21.50 TAX#1 00000105 218667 969444 5015.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #1 STOCK PURCHASES
1,668.10 BEER#2 00000105 218668 978901 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR �t2 STOCK PURCHASES
72.00 BEER#2 00000105 218669 978902 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
18.00 BEER#2 00000105 218670 978903 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
2,092.10 BEER#2 00000105 218671 981998 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
5,042.60 BEER#2 00000105 218672 984970 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
72.00 BEER#2 00000105 218673 964971 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
2,915.25 BEER#2 00000105 218674 987968 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES 'I
104.30 BEER#2 00000105 218675 987969 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES i
78.00 BEER#2 00000105 218676 987970 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES '
20.80- CMBEERtt2 00000105 218677 437 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES '
16.00 TAX#2 00000105 218678 981999 5055.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #2 STOCK PURCHASES
3,975.40 BEER#3 00000105 218679 879625 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
279.00 BEER#3 00000105 218680 979627 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
4,605.15 BEER#3 00000105 218681 982801 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
96.00 BEER#3 00000105 218682 982802 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
6,178.40 BEER#3 00000105 218683 966121 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
305.50 BEER#3 00000105 218684 986123 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES j
3,675.75 BEER#3 00000105 218685 988721 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
303.00 BEER#3 00000105 218686 988724 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR #3 STOCK PI iRCHASES i
I
v_�
R55CKREG �v�20000 CITYOFAPP� , cLLEY 12/1 t0:01:10
Cauncil Check Register Page - 9
12/3/2012 -12/14/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
288.00 BEER#3 00000105 218687 989945 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
31.00 TAX#3 00000105 218688 979626 5085.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
30.40 TAX#3 00000105 218689 986122 5085.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
21.50 TAX#3 00000105 218690 988722 5085.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
31.00 TAX#3 00000105 218691 988723 5085.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR #3 STOCK PURCHASES
60,426.67
250547 72I12I2012 138448 HARTFORD GROUP BENEFITS DIVISI
171.00 BASIC LIFE INSURANCE 218438 6097552 90002117 ACCRUED LIFE INSUR-BASIC PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
8,147.45 SUPP/DEP LIFE INSURANCE 218438 6097552 9000.2118 ACCRUED LIFE INSUR-SUPP/DEPEND PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
8,318.45
250548 12I72/2012 142866 HEALTHPARTNERS
925.87 CONSULT/ADM FEES 218439 41856215 7105.6146 DENTAL INSURANCE INSURANCE TRUST DENTAL
925.87
2b0549 12l12/2012 119353 MADISON NATIONAL LIFE INS CO I
223.60 STD FEES 218441 1200554101166 1020.6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES
2,813.51 LTD INSURANCE 218441 1200554101166 9000.2113 ACCRUED LTD PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
3,037.11
250550 12H212012 116409 BERGMAN, JOHN
50.00- 2012 N�C-BOSTON-BERGMAN 218464 20121201 1005.6278 SUBSISTENCE ALLOWANCE MAYOR/CITY COUNCII
874.04 2012 NLC-BOSTON-BERGMAN 218464 20121201 1005.6276 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP OTHERMAYOR/CITY COUNCIL
824.04
250551 72l7212012 101383 BOOTH, TOMMIE L
50.01 POL-GASOLINE FOR DTF VEHICIE 218356 20121204 1245.6212 MOTOR FUELS/OILS POLICE DAK CTY DRUG TASK FORCE
50.01
250552 12H2I2012 129765 ELVIN, COLLEEN
18.99 ROCHESTER FIRE SCH-BASBALLE 218436 20121130 1310.6276 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCESlEXP OTHERFIRE TRAINING
18.99 ROCHESTER FIRE SCH-ELVIN 218436 20121130 13�0.6276 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP OTHERFIRE TRAINING
65.00 FIRE TEXT BOOK-ELVIN 218436 20121130 1310.6275 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL FIRE TRAINING
205.00 EMT REFRESHER-ELVIN 218436 20121130 1310.6275 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL FIRE TRAINING
345.60 FIRE DEPTADMIN-ELVIN 218436 20121130 1310.6275 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCESlEXP LOCAL FIRE TRAINING
653.58
250553 12H2I2012 100188 GACKSTE7TER, PAMELA ,
37.74 CLERK-MILEAGE 218411 20121205 1015.6277 MILEAGElAUTOALLOWANCE CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS '
54.63 CH-ORNAMENTS FOR LOBBY TREE 218411 20121205 1060.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES MUNICIPAL BLDG & GROUNDS MNTC
76.59 CLERK-MILEAGE 218411 20121205 1015.6277 MIIEAGE/AUTOALLOWANCE CITYCLERK/ELECTIONS li
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12/13/20130:01:10
Council Check Register Page - 10
12/3/2012 —12/14/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
168.96
250554 12172/2012 100798 GETTING, JON A
40.00 STR-JEANS 218412 20121127 1600.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHINGALLOWANCE STREETMANAGEMENT
40.00 ,
250555 12M212012 100734 GIFFORD, JOHN F I
11.65 HCSC-CMS DRUG TEST 218355 20121101 1920.6277 MILEAGE/AUTOALLOWANCE HAYES COMMUNITY & SENIOR CTR iI
11.65
250556 72112/2012 100206 GOODWIN, THOMAS C
1,777.80 2012 NLC-BOSTON-GOODUVIN 216466 20121201 1005.6276 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP OTHERMAYOR/CITY COUNCIL
1,777.80
250567 72/12/2012 701254 HAMANN-ROLAND, MARY
1,067.20 2012 NLC-BOSTON-HAMANN-ROLAND 218465 20121202 1005.6276 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP OTHERMAYOR/CITY COUNCIL
� 1,067.20
250558 12/72/2012 702293 SKINNER, STEPHAN C
100.44 REC-MILEAGE NOV SKINNER 218357 20121130 1700.6277 MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE PARK & RECREATION MANAGEMENT
100.44
260559 12/12/2012 126880 TSCHIDA, ADAM
93.02 MAAG TRAINING-FORT MCCOY TSCHI 218413 20121011 1225.6276 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP OTHERPOLICE TRAINING
83.02
260560 12112/2072 100505 WACHTER, GARY N
13.98 PK-JEANS 218414 20120401 1710.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE PARK MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT
13.98 • ,
250661 12I72I2012 143474 AGBARA, JOY !
200.00 OAKWILT SUPPRES COST SHR PROG 218435 20121001 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES '
200.00
250562 12H2/2012 74099b ANDERSON, NANCY
400.00 OAKWILT SUPPRES COST SHR PROG 218434 20121113 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES
400.00
250563 72172/2072 714393 SCHROEDER, ROY & KATHLEEN
200.00 OAKWILT SUPPRES COST SHR PROG 218432 1209109 1520.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NATURAL RESOURCES
466.67 ALAMO INJ COST SHR PROGRAM 218433 1203291 2072.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES REFORESTATION
866.67 f
� � 'i
R55CKREG c.,v20000 GTYOFAPF. ,LLEY 12/'� t0:01:10
Council Check Register Page - 11
12/3/2012 -12/14/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
250564 12/72I2012 701557 AAA CREDIT SCREENING SVCS LLC
125.00 POL CREDIT CHECKS - NOV 00070460 218723 72661 1215.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES POLICE DETECTIVE UNIT
125.00
250565 12/7212012 101231 ADVANCED GRAPHIX INC
61.14 POL-SQD CAR BADGE lF904 00037606 218369 186776 1210.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS POLICE FIELD OPERATIONSlPATROL
61.14
250566 12172/2012 100958 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS INC
126.11 CMF-RADIO CHARGERS 00070706 218370 33585 1540.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES CMF BUILDINGS & GROUNDS MNTC
126.11
250567 72/12/2012 100039 APPLE VALLEY FORD
293.91 POL VEHICLE LEASE-DEC 218673 20121212 1215.6310 RENTAL EXPENSE POLICE DETECTIVE UNIT
33.38 POL WINDOW SWITCH HOUSING-#100035168 218614 281091 1210.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS POLICE FIELD OPERATIONS/PATROL
327.29 i
I
250568 12/1212012 136617 ARCHETYPE SIGNMAKERS
180.00 LIQ1 VINYL SIGN 00069858 218724 45857 5000.1770 2012133G CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
47.40 LIQ1 SIGNS 00069858 278725 44995016 5000.177U 2012133G CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
227.40
250569 72I12/2072 119452 AW DIRECT INC
143.46 POL-DOOR TOOUWINDOW WEDGE00071152 218371 1019206841 1210.6211 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT POLICE FIELD OPERATIONS/PATROL
36.31 POL-DOOR TOOL 00071152 218372 1019206842 1210.6211 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT POLICE FIELD OPERATIONS/PATROL
179.77
250570 12112/2012 100709 BATTERIES PIUS
41.55 FIRE-bURACELLALKALINE BATTERp0035612 218373 17270005 1330.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS " FIRE OPERATIONS
36.33 FIRE-CAM BATTERY FIRE INVESTIG 218374 17270138 1330.6215 EQUIPMENT PARTS FIRE OPERATIONS
77.88
250571 12/72I2072 700054 BAUER BUILT INC I I
82.83 UTIL-BALANCE BAGS 00035172 218375 180089081 5390.6216 VEHICLES-TIRES/BATTERIES SWR EQUIPNEHICLE MISC MNTClRP '
82.83 I
2b0572 1211212012 109954 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY l
149.75 CH-BEVERAGES FOR MTGS 00041013 218405 1056457 1060.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES MUNICIPAL BLDG & GROUNDS MNTC �
149.75
250573 12/12/2012 142897 BOLTON 8 MENK, INC.
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12/13J20120:01:10 I
Council Check Register Page - 12
12/3/2012 —12/74/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledge Account Description Busin Unit
761.00 AV/WAYFINDING SIGNS AUG 218726 150947 4702.6235 2010108G CONSULTANT SERVICES CEDAR AVENUE
180.00 FLAGSTAFF & CSAH 42 IMPROV 218727 152345 4502.6235 2012112G CONSULTANT SERVICES CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
1,049.50 147TH ST & FLAGSTAFF 218727 152345 4712.6235 2011107G CONSULTANT SERVICES 147TH ST EXT FLAGSTF TO JCAKE
2,398.00 147TH ST & JOHNNY CK RDG RD 218727 152345 4712.6235 2011107G CONSULTANT SERVICES 147TH ST EXT FLAGSTF TO JCAKE
1,979.00 AV/CSAH 42 UNDERPASS 218728 152348 4502.6235 2012112R CONSULTANT SERVICES CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
6,367.50
250574 1211212012 100072 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION
3,686.00 147TH ST EXT-FLAGSTAFF TO JCRR 218602 362529 4712.6235 2011107G CONSULTANT SERVICES 147TH ST EXT FLAGSTF TO JCAKE
66,473.25 CORTLAND ADDN (FISCHER-D.R. HO 218603 362532 4502.6235 2012134G CONSULTANT SERVICES CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
574.50 CONSTR MAT TESTING COBB 7TH 218729 362530 4502.6235 2012151G CONSULTANT SERVICES CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
1,789.50 TRAFFIC SIGNAL 157TH/PILOT KNO 218730 362533 2027.6235 2011140G CONSULTANT SERVICES ROAD ESCROW
1,475.75 AV BUSINESS CAMPUS 218731 362531 4712.6235 2011144G CONSULTANT SERVICES 147TH ST EXT FLAGSTF TO JCAKE
73,999.00
250575 12I72/2012 122369 BRIMEYER FURSMAN, LLC
10,175.62 RECRUITMENT SVCS-P&R DIRECTOR 218760 249 1020.6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES
10,175.62
250576 12/1212012 122460 BRYAN ADVERTISING CO
1,084.94 REC-JACKETS FOR WARMING HOU8Hff61265 218762 39077 1800.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE REC PROGRAM GENERAL
1,084.94
250577 12112I2012 100726 BUG BUSTERS INC
97.26 AVCC-GENERAL PEST CONTROL 00068966 218376 90010 1900.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES AV COMMUNITY CENTER
97.26
250578 12/72/2012 100082 BURNSVILLE, CITY OF
1,725.27 FIN-CJIIN STUDY FOR 2012/2013 218761 201200000013 1040.6399 OTHER CHARGES DATA PROCESSING
1,725.27
250579 12H2/2012 139352 CLARK, KATHLEEN
504.00 HCSC-YOGA INSTRUCT OCT-DEC 218763 20121212 1920.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES HAYES COMMUNITY 8 SENIOR CTR
504.00
250580 72/12/2072 143778 CONSTRUCTION CLEANING SERVICES
530.00 GOLF-REWORK KITCHEN FOR INSPEC 218764 1540 5190.6810 2011137G CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS GOLF CLUBHOUSE CONSTRUCTION
530.00
250581 12/12/2012 100128 DAKOTA ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION
112.02 IA1-VENDING MISER FOR POP MAC810070804 218377 55542053 5205.6211 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT ARENA 1 MANAGEMENT
112.02
R55CKREG �-.,.d20000 CITYOFAPF .LLEY 12/ 10:01:10
Councii Check Register Page - 13
12/3/2012 -12/14/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
250582 12/12/2072 118447 DE PAUL LETTERING I
1,660.00 FIRE-SWEATSHIRTS & T SHIRTS 218765 8173 1300.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE FIRE MANAGEMENT
1,660.00
260583 12N2I2012 100434 DOUGHERTY MOLENDA SOLFEST HILL
390.00 GENERAL CRIMINAL-NOV 218467 132176 1055.6231 LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL PROSECUTING ATTORNEY
505.97 CONVICTION APPEAL-NOV 218468 132177 1055.6231 LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL PROSECUTING ATTORNEY I
40.77 CONVICTION APPEAL-NOV 218469 132178 1055.6231 LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL PROSECUTING ATTORNEY
36.42 FARQUAR EASEMENTS 218470 132194 5505.6231 2009116D LEGAL SERVICES STORM DRAIN UTILITY
437.71 GENERAL LEGAL-ALLEN, JORGE 218471 132195 1050.6231 LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL GENERAL SERVICES '�
83.00 GENERAL LEGAL-VOICESTREAM LEAS 218472 132196 1050.6231 LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL GENERAL SERVICES
326.16 08-392 CEDAR AVE CORRIDOR STUD 218473 132197 4037.6231 2008107G LEGAL SERVICES 08-392 CEDAR AVE CORRIDOR '
95.13 SUMMERFIELD TOWNHOMES 2ND ADDN 218474 132198 4327.6231 LEGAL SERVICES O4-266 SUMMERFIELD TWNHMNS 2ND I
652.32 KELLEY PARK EXPANSION 218475 132199 2017.6810 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS PARK DEDICATION
1,184.93 FISCHER POINTADDITION 218476 132200 4902.6231 2012112R LEGAL SERVICES PHYSICAL IMPROVEMENTS ESCROW
135.90 GENERAL LEGAL-ZAYO LEASE 218477 132201 1050.6231 LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL GENERAL SERVICES
1,060.02 TIF DISTRICTS-GENERAL 218478 132202 4717.6231 LEGAL SERVICES VALLEY BUSINESS PARK-SPOWD
235.00 AV BUSINESS CAMPUS 218479 132203 4902.6231 2011144R LEGAL SERVICES PHYSICAL IMPROVEMENTS ESCROW
456.50 CBL LAKE SOUTH SHORE 6TH 218480 132204 4502.6231 2011148G LEGAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS I
924.12 CODE VIOLATIONS-MISC 218481 132205 1050.6231 LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL GENERAL SERVICES ',
601.75 FISCHER POINTADDITION 218482 132206 4902.6231 2012112R LEGAL SERVICES PHYSICAL IMPROVEMENTS ESCROW I
122.31 LITIGATION-GENERAL 218483 132207 1055.6231 LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL PROSECUTING ATTORNEY I
13,093.25 PARKSIDE VILLAGE (LEGACY N 8 T 218484 132208 4719.6231 2012150G LEGAL SERVICES LEGACY-IMH I
842.00 CORTLAND ADDN (FISCHER-D.R. HO 218485 132209 4502.6231 2012134G LEGAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS I
2,310.00 CUB FOODS ADDN 218486 132210 4902.6231 LEGAL SERVICES PHYSICAL IMPROVEMENTS ESCROW I
518.75 GENERAL LEGAL-SPRINT LEASE 218487 732211 1050.6231 LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL GENERAL SERVICES '
27.18 UTIGATION-GENERAL 218488 132212 1055.6231 LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL PROSECUTING ATTORNEY I
282.00 2012 LEASE EXTENSION 218489 132213 5025.6231 LEGAL SERVICES LIQUOR #1 OPERATIONS �I
124.50 CHICK-A-FIL LEGAL 218490 132214 4902.6231 LEGAL SERVICES PHYSICAL IMPROVEMENTS ESCROW i
41.50 MENARDS SITE IMPRV-FLAGSTAFF 218491 132215 4602.6231 2010104G LEGAL SERVICES ENG DEV REVIEW NON-REIMBURS I
24,527.19
I
250584 12172i2012 100148 DPC INDUSTRIES INC I I
2,174.86 UTIL-FIUORIDE 00048450 218378 82700216612 5325.6214 CHEMICALS WATER TREATMENT FCLTY MNTC/RPR
2,174.86
250585 12N2/2012 100407 EMERGENCYAUTOMOTIVETECHNOLOG
2,302.05 POL-NEW SQUAD SET UP #902 00047575 218406 11203 1210.6211 SMAIL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT POLICE FIELD OPERATIONS/PATROL ,
3,783.42 POL-NEW SQUAD SET UP #902 00047575 218406 11203 1210.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT POLICE FIELD OPERATIONS/PATROL
6,085.47 '
i
R55CKREG LOG20000 GTY OF APPLE VALLEY 12/13l20120:01:10
Cauncil Check Register Page - 14 I
12/3/2012 -12/14/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledge Account Descripfion Business Unit l
250586 12112/2012 743830 FACTORY DIRECT PROMOS INC �
1,550.00 LIQ-PRINTING WINE TOTE BAGS 218766 4122 5005.6239 PRINTING LIQUOR GENERAL OPERATIONS
1,550.00 i
I
250587 72/12/2012 700420 FISCHER MINING, LLC I
73.67 UTIL-RC BASE-FOR WATER BRK RPfl0035242 218767 5387 5330.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES ' W!R MAIN/HYDRANT/CURB STOP MNT
73.67
250588 72H2@072 101088 FLANAGAN SALESINC
52,445.44 PK BLEACHERS FOR JC & QP 218733 14441 7205.6399 OTHER CHARGES RISK MANAGEMENTSlINSURANCE
52,445.44
250589 12N2/2012 142832 GENESIS EMPLOYEE BENEFITS INC
100.00 FSA MINIMUM MONTHLY FEE 218379 16709 1020.6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES
190.35 HR-RMSA RECORDKEEPING 218379 16709 1020.6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES
350.00 HRA CLAIMS PROCESSING 218379 16709 1020.6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES
200.00 HR-BENEFIT SUMMARY DOC PREP 218380 16750 1020.6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES
840.35
250590 12/1212012 100995 GENUINE PARTS CO-MINNEAPOLIS
83.23 GOLF-RAG 00035390 218424 468720 5155.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
14.59 GOLF-TIRE VALVE 00035390 218425 468720 5155.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS GOLF EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
30.93 PK-CHAIN LINK-HOLDER SNOW BL�035350 218426 467715 1765.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
23.32 PK-BRITE LITE LAMP #203 TRACTO 00035350 218427 469116 1765.6215 EG�UIPMENT-PARTS PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
152.07
250591 12H2/2012 100510 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD
834.23 UTIL-OMNI METER-CEDAR KNOLLS 00035250 218381 5846772 5310.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS WATER METER RPR/REPLACE/READNG I
834.23 I
2b0592 12172/2012 137419 HEDBERG, RON ''
11.66 PK-TRAINING LUNCHES-ENDRES 00062443 218744 62443 1705.6275 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL PARK & RECREATION MGMT TRAING
13.25 PK-TRAINING IUNCHES-GLEWINE 00062443 218744 62443 1705.6275 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL PARK & RECREATION MGMT TRAING
15.18 PK-TRAINING LUNCHES-HIGGINS 00062443 218744 62443 1705.6275 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL PARK & RECREATION MGMT TRAING
40.09
250593 1217212012 127078 HELENA CHEMICAL COMPANY ,
1,526.28 GOLF-TOURQUE/CHIPCO 00050087 218382 134720960 5150.6214 CHEMICALS GOLF COURSE MAINTENANCE
741.85 GOLF-TURF CHEMICALS 00050087 218383 134719890 5150.6214 CHEMICALS GOLF COURSE MAINTENANCE
420.13 GOLF-TURF CHEMICALS 00050087 218384 134719896 5150.6214 CHEMICALS GOLF COURSE MAINTENANCE
657.46 GOLF-TURF CHEMICALS 00050087 218385 134719743 5150.6214 CHEMICALS GOLF COURSE MAINTENANCE
3,34572
R55CKREG Cvt;20000 CITYOFAPP� .LLEY 12/1 .0:01:10
Council Check Register Page - 15
12/3l2012 —12/14l2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
250594 72112/2012 128972 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GRdUP INC
7,263.10 DEV-PROF SVCS FOR AV BRTOD OCT 218769 120206 1145.6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES LCDA GRANT-HANSON STUDY
4,286.99 DEV-PROF SVCS FOR AVBRTOD NOV 218770 120207 1145.6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES LCDA GRANT-HANSON STUDY
11,550.09
260595 12/72/2012 143729 HOLLY HANSEN CONSULTING
1,542.30 CABLE-PEG ACCESS RVW THRU NOV 218768 20121202 2012.6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES CABLE N JOINT POWERS
1, 542.30
260596 72/1212012 100242 INDEPENDENT BLACK DIRT CO
27.79 PK-BLACK DIRT 00035343 218421 11186 1720.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE
69.47 STR-BLACK DIRT, STUMP RPR 00035429 218422 11231 1610.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREETBOULEVARD REPAIR & MNTC
69.47 STR-BLACK DIRT, STUMP RPR 00035429 218423 11230 1610.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET/BOULEVARD REPAIR 8 MNTC
166.73
250597 12I12I2012 100244 INDUSTRIAL UNIPORM CO LLC
105.38 STR-BIBERALL 00048333 218771 44700 1600.6281 UNIFORM(CLOTHINGALLOWANCE STREETMANAGEMENT ,
105.38 I
250598 12/72/2072 120553 INTEGRATED LOSS CONTROL, INC.
1,140.00 HR-LABOR CONSULT 12/1/12-11/30 218386 9455 1020.6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES
1,140.00
250599 12/72/2012 100255 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR
618.09 GOLF-LIQ FOR SALE 00046398 218407 1450985 5120.6429 GOLF-LIQUOR GOLF KITCHEN
618.09
250600 12112/2012 138157 JOHNSTON, CATHY JO
51.00 REC-MRS CLAUS � BFAST W/SANTB.0070954 218387 20121201 1845.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES REC SELF SUPPORT PROG GENERAL
51.00
250607 72/12/2012 141814 JTK DISTRIBUTORS
459.00 GOLF-CIGARS 00035055 218408 10412 5115.6417 GOLF-CIGARS GOLF PRO SHOP
459.00
250602 12N212012 132646 KWIK KOPY BUSINESS SOLUTIONS
85.50 DEV-BUSINESS CARDS NORDQlL0�1068625 218388 12519 1100.6239 PRINTiNG DEV MANAGEMENT
89.78 INSP-BUSINESS CARDS 00043136 218772 12599 7400.6239 PRINTING INSPECTIONS MANAGEMENT
17528
250603 12I72/2012 743823 LANGER CONSTRUCTION
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12/13/20120:01:10
Council Check Register Page - 16
12/3/2012 -12l14/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledge Account Description Busin Unit
1,281.80 REFUND OVPMT BLDG PRMTAV038714 218409 12135 1001.4073 PERMIT-BUILDING PLAN REVIEW GENERAL FUND REVENUE
1,972.00 REFUND OVPMT BLDG PRMTAV038714 218409 12135 7001.4060 PERMIT-BUILDING PERMIT GENERAL FUND REVENUE
3,253.80
260604 12/12/2012 143160 LATOUR CONSTRUCTION INC
155.52 147TH ST EXT FLAGSTAFF TO JCRR 218734 201110706 2027.6810 2011107G CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS ROAD ESCROW
4,367.20 147TH ST EXT FLAGSTP�FF TO JCRR 218734 201110706 2027.6810 2011107G CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS ROAD ESCROW
10,294.51 147TH ST EXT FLAGSTAFF TO JCRR 218734 201110706 2027.6810 2D11107G CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS ROAD ESCROW
16,880.86 147TH ST EXT FLAGSTAFF TO JCRR 218734 201110706 2027.6810 2011107G CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS ROAO ESCROW
234,583.85 147TH ST EXT FLAGSTAFF TO JCRR 218734 201110706 2027.6810 2011107G CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS ROAD ESCROW
266,281.94
250605 12112I2012 137375 LAW BULLETIN
1,500.00 DEV-MN IND & ECON DEV CONF-DYK 218773 1617851 1100.6239 PRINTING DEV MANAGEMENT
1, 500.00
250606 12172/2012 101616 LMC INSURANCE TRUST
379.32 WC DEDUCTIBLE-ZUKANOFF-DEC 218610 20121201 7205.6315 WORKERS COMP-DEDUCTIBLE RISK MANAGEMENTS/INSURANCE
1,050.29 WC DEDUCTIBLE-ABBOTT-DEC 218611 20121201 7205.6315 WORKERS COMP-DEDUCTIBLE RISK MANAGEMENTS/INSURANCE
69.04 WC DEDUCTIBLE-LYONS-DEC 218612 20121201 7205.6315 WORKERS COMP-DEDUCTIBLE RISK MANAGEMENTS/INSURANCE
1,498.65
250607 12I12/2072 176371 LOFFLER
75.88 IT TONER FOR HR 218735 1491676 1030.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
151.76 IT TONER FOR POLICE 218736 1490078 1030.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
249.02 IT TONER FOR POLICE 218737 1491136 1030.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
476.66
250608 12/12/2012 101200 LOFFLER COMPANIES INC
27.91 IT COPIER MAINT-MAIL ROOM 218738 216911878 1030.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
42.66 IT COPIER MAINT-DEV 218738 216911818 1030.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
86.69 POL COPIER MAINT-1ST & 2ND FL 218738 216911818 1200.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT POLICE MANAGEMENT
129.16 PW COPIER MAINT 218738 216911818 1500.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT PW MANAGEMENT
182.62 REC COPIER MAINT-AVCC 218738 216911818 1700.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT PARK & RECREATION MANAGEMENT '
183.44 IT COPIER MAINT-2ND FL MAIN 218738 216911818 7030.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY �
196.70 IT COPIER LEASE-MAIL ROOM 218738 216911818 1030.6310 RENTAL EXPENSE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY '
349.87 POL COPIER LEASE-1ST FL 218738 216911818 1200.6310 RENTAL EXPENSE POLICE MANAGEMENT
364.74 POL COPIER LEASE-2ND FL 218738 216911818 1200.6310 RENTAL EXPENSE POLICE MANAGEMENT
385.19 PW COPIER LEASE 218738 216911818 1500.6310 RENTAL EXPENSE PW MANAGEMENT
385.20 REC COPIER LEASE-AVCC 218738 216911818 1700.6310 RENTAL EXPENSE PARK & RECREATION MANAGEMENT
652.22 IT COPIER LEASE-DEV & 2ND FL M 218738 216911818 1030.6310 RENTAL EXPENSE INFORMATION TECHNOIOGY
2, 986.40
RSSCKREG �� �20000 CITY OF APF LLEY 12/1 0:01:10
Council Check Register Page - 17
12/3/2012 -12/14/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subiedger Account Description Business Unit
260609 12172/2012 143671 LYNN MOORE CLASSES
54.00 HCSC-JEWELRY CLASS INSTRUCT@10070178 218389 70178 1920.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES HAYES COMMUNITY & SENIOR CTR
54.00
250610 12112/2012 700309 MENARDS
. 68.31 LIQ3-STEP LADDER, DOOR BUMPEfa9069857 218492 9792 5095.6211 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT LIQUOR #3 OPERATIONS
43.19 PK-�EAF RAKE 00035348 218493 10209 1720.6211 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE
36.26 NR-PRUNING SAW, PICKAXE 00067400 218494 10235 1520.6211 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT NATURAL RESOURCES
22.37 AVCC-MISC SUPPLIES 00069707 218495 10297 1900.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES AV COMMUNITY CENTER
85.37 STR-MAILBOX POSTS 00035439 218496 10623 1665.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET SNOW & ICE MATERIALS
56.38 STR-LEAF RAKES 00035439 218497 10385 1610.6211 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT STREET/BOULEVARD REPAIR & MNTC
53.38 STR-SLEDGE HAMMERS FOR PLONDIDB35439 218498 10142 1610.6211 SMALLTOOLS & EQUIPMENT STREET/BOULEVARD REPA�R & MNTC
31.57 CH-CHRISTMAS DECORATIONS 00069460 218499 10644 1060.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES MUNICIPAL BLDG & GROUNDS MNTC
8.53 POL-THREADLOCKER 00067476 218500 10630 1200.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE MANAGEMENT
24.01 PK-TAPE FOR TREE WRAP 00035348 218501 10148 1720.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE
50.82 PK-RED, BLUE PAINT, TAPE 00035348 216502 9801 1725.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ICE RINK MAINTENANCE
49.46 PK-S HOOKS, COIL 00035348 218503 9786 1715.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARKATHLETIC FIELD MAINTENANC
6.40 PK-ROLLER COVERS 00035348 218504 9690 1730.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE
12.88 PK-CAULK 00035348 218505 9621 1730.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE
34.18 PK-MISC MOUSE CONTROL ITEMS 00035348 218506 9201 1730.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE
31.53 PK-PAINT, PRiMER 00035348 218507 9265 1725.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ICE RINK MAINTENANCE
20.09 PK-LAWN BAGS 00035348 218508 9262 1720.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE
24.51 IA2-MOP, BROOM 00068400 218509 9205 5265.6211 SMALLTOOLS & EQUIPMENT ARENA2 BLDG MAINTENANCE-HAYES
32.05 PK-SLEDGEHAMMER 00035348 218510 9465 1725.6211 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT PARK ICE RINK MAINTENANCE
208.01 PK-LUMBER 00035348 218511 9465 1725.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ICE RINK MAINTENANCE
58.78 POL-COLORED DUCK TAPE 00069522 218512 9879 1200.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE MANAGEMENT
21.38 PK-REMOVABLE CONCRETE, LEVEL�010602 218513 10602 1720.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE
188.24 PK-LINKS, COIL FOR QUARRY GATE00035348 218514 10200 1720.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE
37.81 PK-CONCRETE MIX, DCON 00035348 218515 10633 1730.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE
28.84 IA1-WORKLIGHT 00069300 218516 10653 5210.6211 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT ARENA 1 BUILDING MAINTENANCE
41.75 IA1-CLAMPS, CLIPS, CORDS 00069300 218517 10653 5210.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA 1 BUILDING MAINTENANCE
10.63 POL-ELECTRICALTAPE 00069528 218518 10915 1210.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE FIELD OPERATIONS/PATROL
49.50 CMF-FELT PADS, BOLT CAPS, WAX 00035439 218519 10601 1540.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES CMF BUILDINGS & GROUNDS MNTC
10.93 PK-SPLICE SLEEVE, BOX HANDLINm0035348 218520 10697 1720.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE
2.86 CEMETERY METAL POLISH 00035349 218521 10696 5605.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES CEMETERY
27.52 IA2-CLEANERS 00070752 218522 10624 5265.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA 2 BLDG MAINTENANCE-HAYES
31.29 IA2-ENG OIL, SILICONE 00070752 218523 10624 5270.6212 MOTOR FUELS/OILS ARENA 2 EQUIPMENT MAINT-HAYES
23.49 FIRE-LIGHT BULB FOR PARKING 1000036477 218524 10824 1340.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE BLDG & GROUNDS MNTC
23.55- FIRE-RETURN LIGHT BULB 00036477 218525 11240 1340.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE BLDG & GROUNDS MNTC
252.02 FIRE-TARPS, CO 2 ALARM 00036477 218526 11467 1330.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE OPERATIONS
RSSCKREG LOG20000 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12/13/20120:01:10 I
Councii Check Register Pa9e �a
12/3/2012 -12/14l2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanatian PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledge Account Description Business Unit
21.35 FIRE-HALIDE CLR BULB 00036477 218527 11241 1340.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE BLDG & GROUNDS MNTC
36.93 LIQ3-GIFT WRAP, GARLAND 00065895 278528 11227 5095.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR #3 OPERATIONS
43.00 AVCC-MISC SUPPLIES 00069708 218529 11385 1900.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES AV COMMUNITY CENTER
48.00 CMF-WAX RING KITS, CLNR 00035439 218530 11207 1540.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES CMF BUILDINGS 8 GROUNDS MNTC
28.59 CMF-VACUUM BREAKER RPR KIT, C@0035439 218531 11299 1540.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES CMF BUILDINGS & GROUNDS MNTC i
32.05 POL-WET/DRY VAC 00068239 218532 11305 1250.6211 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT POLICE FACILITY
7.08 POL-PIPE WRAP 00068239 218533 11305 1250.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE FACILITY
56.76 PK-MUIIT METER 00035348 218534 11214 1730.6211 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE
16.07 LIQ1-TWINE, SOAP, GLUE 00067784 218535 11253 5025.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR #1 OPERATIONS
38.36 UTIL-UTILITY HEATERS FOR LIFT 00035238 218536 11130 5380.6211 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT SEWER LIFT STN REPAIR & MNTC
5.76 UTIL-RV ANTIFREEZE 00035238 218537 11130 5390.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES SWR EQUIPNEHICLE MISC MNTC/RP
7.86 UTIL-PVC CONDUIT FOR WTP 00035238 218538 10737 5325.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT FCLTY MNTC/RPR
13.73 HCSC-AIR BLOW GUN, HACKSAW B�9.070169 218539 11307 1920.6211 SMALL TOOLS 8 EQUIPMENT HAYES COMMUNITY 8 SENIOR CTR
62.65 HCSC-BAGS, TERRY TOWELS, MISOD0070169 218540 11307 1920,6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES HAYES COMMUNITY & SENIOR CTR
13.61 CMF-MISC RPR SUPPLIES 00035439 218541 11468 1540.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES CMF BUILDINGS & GROUNDS MNTC i
14.80 CMF-MASONRY BIT, FIUTE 00035439 218542 11451 1540.6211 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT CMF BUILDINGS & GROUNDS MNTC
101.96 GOLF-SUPPLIES 00035389 218543 10120 5150.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF COURSE MAINTENANCE
30.52 GOLF-2 CYL OIL 00035389 218544 10120 5155.6212 MOTOR FUELS/OILS GOLF EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
12.11 GOLF-ANTIFREEZE, BAR & CHAIN L00035389 218545 10120 5155.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
6.40 GOLF-NUT DRIVER SET 00035389 218546 10120 5150.6211 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT GOLF COURSE MAINTENANCE
13.33 UTIL-BLEACH, MISC SUPPLIES 00035238 218547 11233 5325.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT FCLTY MNTC/RPR
2, 303.71
250671 12172I2072 128699 MES-MIDAM
5,050.91 FIRE-TEMPEST SPEED BLOWER 00051216 218390 354400SNV 1330.6211 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT FIRE OPERATIONS
5,050.91
250612 1217212072 100311 METRO COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SV
94.60- RETAINED % NOVEMBER 218739 20121130 5301.4999 MISC UTILITY REVENUE WATER & SEWER FUND REVENUE
9,460.00 SAC COILECTION NOVEMBER 218739 20121130 5301.4922 SAC COLLECTIONS WATER & SEWER FUND REVENUE
9, 365.40
250613 12172/2012 102822 MIDWEST VOLLEYBALL WAREHOUSE I
305.51 REC-VOLLEYBALLS/HEIGHT CHAIN/80069002 218774 21226013 1860.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REC VOLLEYBALL I
305.51 I
250614 12112/2072 100334 MN DEPT OF HEALTH I
332.00 REC FOOD LICENSE-JCR PARK-2013 218741 20121212 1850.6280 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS REC SOFTBALL
722.50 GOLF FOOD �ICENSE-2013 218741 20121212 5105.6280 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF MANAGEMENT
816.00 POOL FOOD LICENSE-2013 218741 20121212 1930.6280 DUES 8 SUBSCRIPTIONS REDWOOD POOL
882.00 SWIM FOOD LICENSE-2013 218741 20121212 1940.6280 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS AQUATIC SWIM CENTFR
2,752.50 �
__ I
R55CKREG LU1i20000 CITYOFAPPL �LEY 12/1� J:01:10
Council Check Register Page - 19
12/3/2012 —12/14/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
250615 12112/2012 100546 MN GOLF ASSOCIATION INC
22.00 GOLF-HANDICAP FEE 00050114 218428 45081605 5115.6426 HANDICAP FEE GOLF PRO SHOP
242.00 GOLF-HANDICAP FEE 00050114 218429 45081603 5115.6426 HANDICAP FEE GOLF PRO SHOP
44.00 GOLF-HANDICAP FEE 00050114 218430 45081602 5115.6426 HANDICAP FEE GOLF PRO SHOP
308.00
250616 7211212012 129242 NORTHSTAR SCOREBOARDS INC
7,477.49 AVCC NEVCO SCOREBOARD 00051230 218742 N1259 4940.6740 CAPITAL OUTLAY-MACHlEQ/OTHER 2007 GENERAL PARK IMPROVEMENTS
7,477.49
250617 12172/2012 742604 NORTON HOMES LLC
4,025.00 REIMB NRMP 13284 GEORGIA DR 218743 20121212 4900.2420 NRMP FIN GUAR-DEVELOPER DEP PHYSICAL IMPROV ESCROW BAL SHT
4,025.00
250618 12I12I2012 143826 PATINA APPLE VALLEY LAND, LLC
8,000.00 REIMB ESCROW-EAGLE RIDGE 218732 20121213 4901.5078 2011141G ESCROV�PROJECT COSTS PHYSICAL IMPROV ESCROW REVENUE I
8,000.00
250619 12112/2072 100374 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY
280.06 CMF-POP 00046895 218410 7043378 1540.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE CMF BUILDINGS & GROUNDS MNTC
280.06
260620 12/1212012 100673 RED WING SHOE STORE
150.00 BOOTS - MICHAEL GLEWWE 00045232 218391 7240000004284 1600.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE STREET MANAGEMENT
114.30 BOOTS- DAVE WILLMAN 00045232 218404 724043639 5305.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE WATER MGMT/REPORT/DATA ENTRY
264.30
250621 12H212012 119316 RON KASSA CONSTRUCTION INC
2,696.20 STR CONCRETE REMOVAL & REPIACE 218745 20121016 1610.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES STREET/BOULEVARD REPAIR & MNTC
2,698.20
250622 72/7212012 100745 ROSEMOUNT, CITY OF
99.96 REC-SORR GROUND POUNDERS R,AQ�70959 218775 20121206 1820.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REC CULTURAL PROGRAMS
99.96
250623 12112l2012 119574 SAVAGE, CITY OF
561.09 FIELD RENTAL 2012 SORR KICKBAL 218776 19610 1855.6399 OTHER CHARGES REC FOOTBALL & SOCCER
561.09
250624 12/12/2012 107305 SEMA EQUIPMENT
84.46 PK-REVOLVING LT JD TRACTOR#2050049834 218392 469136 1765.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 12/13/20130:01:10
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register Page - 20
12/3/2012 -12/14/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
84.46
250625 12/12/2012 742823 SHORESH THERAPYAND CONSULTATI
312.50 HR-NOVEMBER SESSIONS 00069923 218393 20121203 1020.6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES
312.50
250626 12I12/2072 700447 SOUTH RIVER HEATING 8� COOLING
502.47 UTIL-WTP ANNUAL MAINT 00035244 218394 1215953 5325.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT WATER TREATMENT FCLTY MNTC/RPR
1,213.45 CMF-SCHEDULED MAINT OF HVAC 00035202 218395 1215954 1540.6266 REPAIRS-BUI�DING CMF BUILDINGS & GROUNDS MNTC
1,147.54 CH-REPL LWR LVL TRANE RET MTR00035202 218396 1215955 1060.6266 REPAIRS-BUILDING MUNICIPAL BLDG & GROUNDS MNTC
2,863.46
250627 72H212012 120666 SYMBOLARTS
384.75 POL-BADGES 216777 1783241N 1200.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE POLICE MANAGEMENT
24.75- 218777 1783241N 1000.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
360.00
250628 12112/2072 742499 TITAN MACHINERY
49.31 PK-HYDRAULIC COUPLER SEAL KIT�0050728 218397 137034PC 1765.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
49.31
250629 12H2/2012 143829 TRAVIS MATTHEW APPAREL
10.08 GOLF FREIGHT 00070852 218746 43037 5115.6424 GOLF FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE GOLF PRO SHOP
94.00 GOLF PANTS - BRIAN R 00070852 218746 43037 5115.6413 GOLF-CAPS/HATS/CLOTHING GOLF PRO SHOP
104.08
250630 12/1212012 100489 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
12.83 POL-BUTTON W/ BACKING HARDW/OD658647 218398 141915 1200.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE POLICE MANAGEMENT
10.67 POL-NAME BAR RECHTZIGEL 00058647 218399 142292 1200.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHINGALLOWANCE POLICE MANAGEMENT
23.50
250631 72H2/2012 142869 UNITED BICYCLE SUPPLY
10.26 POL-SHIFT CABLE 00067546 218400 SI-128341 1210.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS POLICE FIELD OPERATIONS/PATROL
.66- 00067546 218400 SI-128341 1000.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET �
9.60 �
250632 12/12/2072 126275 US BANK OPERATIONS CENTER
12,971.53 POL DCC - JAN 218747 DCC112431000 1000.1560 PREPAID EXPENSES GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
12,971.53
250633 12/72/2012 121017 VALLEY LAKE IRRIGATION, LLC
85.00 LIQ#3-VNNTERIZED SPRINKLER SY310065896 218401 65896 5095.6266 REPAIRS-BUILDING LIQUOR #3 OPERAT
• , i
RSSCKREG LuG20000 CITYOFAPP� ,�LEY 12/1, :0:01:10
Council Check Register Page - 21
12/3/2012 —12/14/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explenation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
85.00
250634 12/12I2012 700637 VERI20N WIRELESS l i
1,518.52 POL-CELL PHONE NOV 218750 2837007557 1200.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS POLICE MANAGEMENT
1, 518.52 '
250635 72/12/2012 134920 VISUAL COMMUNICATIONS
1,800.00 TIF-CED AV TRANSITWAY WAYFINDI 218402 10247 4702.6235 2010108G CONSULTANT SERVICES CEDAR AVENUE
1,800.00 ',
250636 72l12/2012 737bb1 WESTERN EQUIPMENT FINANCE
64.24 GOIF MOWER-LEASE TO PURCHASE 218748 921080 5150.6323 INTEREST EXPENSE GOLF COURSE MAINTENANCE
68.41 GOLF MOWER-LEASE TO PURCHASE 218748 921080 5150.6310 RENTAL EXPENSE GOLF COURSE MAINTENANCE j
930.75 GOLF MOWER-LEASE TO PURCHASE 218748 921080 5100.2715 CAPITAL LEASE-NONCURRENT GOLF FUND BALANCE SHEET
1, 063.40
250637 72/72/2012 138032 YELLOW BOOK WEST I
183.21 GOLF-SOUTH METROAD 00051271 218749 20121203 5105.6239 PRINTING GOLF MANAGEMENT
18321
250638 12I12I2072 100526 2EE MEDICAL SERVICE
152.31 PK-FIRSTAID SUPPLIES 00065087 218403 54044726 1770.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK GENERAL MAINTENANCE
152.31 '
20121211 12/3/2012 100873 HEALTHPARTNERS ',
2,396.63 DENTAL CLAIMS 11/22-11/28/12 218437 20121128 7105.6146 DENTAL INSURANCE INSURANCE TRUST DENTAL
2,396.63
20121212 12/10/2012 100873 HEALTHPARTNERS '
4,277.37 DENTAL CLAIMS 11/29-12/5/12 218440 20121205 7105.6146 DENTAL INSURANCE INSURANCE TRUST DENTAL
4,277.37
20721213 72/7012072 702664 ANCHOR BANK
7,282.49 EMPLOYEE MEDICARE 218326 1212016 9000.2111 ACCRUED FEDERAUFICA PAYROLL CLEARWG BAL SHEET
7,282.49 CITY SHARE MEDICARE 218326 1212016 9000.2111 ACCRUED FEDERAUFICA PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
14,069.22 EMPLOYEE FICA 218326 121201 B 9000.2111 ACCRUED FEDERAVFICA PAYROLL CIEARING BAL SHEET
20,768.92 CITY SHARE FICA 218326 121201B 9000.2111 ACCRUED FEDERAUFICA PAYROLL CLEARWG BAL SHEET
52,302.47 FEDERALTAXES PR 218326 1212016 9000.2111 ACCRUED FEDERAL/FICA PAYROLLCLEARING BAL SHEET
101,7D5.59 '
20121214 72I10/2012 700657 MN DEPT OF REVENUE
21,634.98 PAYROLL STATE TAX 218325 121201G 9000.2112 ACCRUED STATE W/H PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SNEET
I
APPLE VALLEY 12/13/20120:01:10 I
RSSCKREG LOG20000 CITY OF I
Council Check Register Pa9e 22
I
12/3/2012 —12l14/2012
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledge Account Description Business Unit
21,634.98 ',
20721215 72111/2012 701348 DEPOSITORYTRUSTCOMPANY
110,000.00 PRIN GO PARK BOND 2007 218751 1211120021 3347.6910 BOND PRINCIPAL BONDS OF 2007, $6,400,000
110,000.00 PRIN GO PARK BOND 2008 218751 1211120021 3357.6910 BOND PRINCIPAL BONDS OF 2008, $6,685,000
250,000.00 PRINC GO IMP BOND 2007 218751 1211120021 3342.6910 BOND PRINCIPAL BONDS OF 2007, $3,600,000
470,000.00
20121216 72I11/2012 701348 DEPOSITORY TRUST COMPANY
52,643.75 INT GO IMP BOND 2007 218752 1211120023 3342.7015 DEBT SERVICE-INTEREST BONDS OF 2007, $3,600,000
126,153.75 INT GO PARK BOND 2008 218752 1211120023 3357.7015 DEBT SERVICE-INTEREST BONDS OF 2008, $6,685,000
128,165.00 INT GO PARK BOND 2007 218752 1211120023 3347.7015 DEBT SERVICE-INTEREST BONDS OF 2007, $6,400,000
306,962.50
20121277 12I1712012 135249 NORTHLAND TRUST SERVICES, INC.
21,381.25 INT GO BOND 2011A-PARK 218753 1211120020 3362.7015 DEBT SERVICE-INTEREST BONDS OF 2011, $3,945,000
32,041.25 INT GO BOND 2011A-STM SWR 218753 1211120020 5505.7015 DEBT SERVICE-INTEREST STORM DRAIN UTILITY
40,000.00 PRIN GO BOND 2011A-PARK 218753 1211120020 3362.6910 BOND PRINCIPAL BONDS OF 2011, $3,945,000
140,000.00 PRINC GO BOND 2011A-STM SWR 218753 1211120020 5505.6910 BOND PRINCIPAL STORM DRAIN UTILITY
233,422.50
20721218 7211112072 700331 MN DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY
66.31- LESS 2% RETENTION NOVEMBER 218740 20121130 1001.4099 PERMIT-OTHER GENERAL FUND REVENUE
3,315.27 PERMIT SURCHARGE NOVEMBER 218740 20121130 1001.4072 STATE SURTAX COLLECTED GENERAL FUND REVENUE
3,248.96
20727219 72114/2012 130957 GENESIS EMPLOYEE BENEFITS INC
744.95 FLEX SPENDING MEDICAL - 2012 218692 121202N 9000.2119 ACCRUED FLEX SPENDING PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
1,565.04 FLEX SPENDING DAYCARE - 2012 218692 121202N 9000.2119 ACCRUED FLEX SPENDING PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET
2,309.99
1,900,146.16 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals
��'.. CheckTotal 646,677.12
�`�� TransferTotal 1,145,958.52
� , Pay ModeX Total 107,510.52
�� Total Payments 1,900,146.16
�� �
�
'�
_ I
,
. . .
. , , ��I
RS5CKSUM LO�z0000 CITY OF APP, <�LEY 12/1 0:02:29
Council Check Summary Page - 1
12/3/2012 - 12/14/2012 i
I
Company Amount
01000 GENERAL FUND 112,516.53
02010 CABLE N RESERVE FUND 1,542.30
02015 PARK DEDICATION FUND 652.32
02025 ROAD ESCROW FUND 268,071.44
02070 REFORESTATION FUND 466.67
03340 GO IMP BOND 2007, $3,600,000 302,64375 '
03345 GO PARK BOND 2007, $6,400,000 238,165.00 I
03355 GO PARK BOND 2008, $6,685,000 236,153.75
03360 GO PARK BOND 2011, $3,945,000 61,381.25
04030 DAKOTACTY CONSTRUCT PROJ FUND 326.16 ',
04300 2003 CONSTRUCTION FUND 95.13 '
04500 CONSTRUCT�ON PROJECTS 70,50525 �
04600 ENG DEV REVIEW NON-REIMBURS 41.50
04700 TIF DIST#13-CAPITAL PROJECTS 2,561.00
04710 TIF DIST#7-CAPITAL PROJECTS 8,609.25
04715 20121MPROVEMENTS 14,153.27
04900 PHYSICAL IMPROVEMENTS ESCROW F 16,512.68
04935 2007 PARK BOND FUND 7,477•49 ,
05000 LIQUOR FUND 160,342.35
05100 GOLF FUND 8,298.85 ,
05200 ARENAFUND 265.93 i
05300 WATER & SEWER FUND 17,155.97 'I
05500 STORM DRAINAGE UTILITY FUND 172,825.26 I
05600 CEMETERY FUND LEVEL PROGRAM 2•$6 �
05800 STREET LIGHT UTIL FUND 161.49
07100 INSURANCE TRUST DENTAL FUND 7,599.87
07200 RISK MANAGEMENT/INSURANCE FUND 54,836.32
09000 PAYROLL CLEARING FUND 136,782.52 '�
I
� ReportTotais 1,900,146.16
i
I
I
I
I
I
�!