Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/17/1990 � K � . � � � CITY OF APPLE VALLEY PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE April 17, 1990 Minutes of the Apple Valley Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee held April 17, 1990, at the Apple Valley Community Center. PRESENT: Chairperson Greg Kopischke; Committee Members John DiRico (left at 9:lOpm) , Tina Rankin, David Gross (left at 9:lOpm), Ann Wyllie (arrived at 8:35pm) ; Parks and Recreation Director Randy Johnson; Associate City Planner Meg McMonigal; and ten members of the general public. ABSENT: � Russ DeFauw and Charlie Maus 1. Chairman Kopischke called the meeting to order at 7:37 pm. 2. Approval of the Agenda.. Randy Johnson requested two changes in the agenda: delete the 1990 group picture under item #6.A. ; and include an update on the bike: pathways. for Dakota County. MOTION: by Tina Rankin, seconded by John DiRico to approve the agenda with the noted changes. VOTE; Yes - 4, No - 0 3. Approval of March Minutes. MOTION: by Tina Rankin, seconded by John DiRico to accept the March minutes with the following changes: 1. Page 3, paragraph 3, second sentence - should begin a new ° paragraph and read For the Apple Ponds development, money for the purchase of the land would come in as the building permits from the development are paid for. 2. Page 5, paragraph 4 - delete the second sentence. 3. Page 5, paragraph 7 - delete the second sentence. 1 � • _ � . 4, Page 6, paragraph 1 - change the word Some to The, to make the sentence read The committee members do not Zike the idea of selling park Zand. 5. Correct the meeting date from March 17 to March 20. " VOTE: .Yes - 4, No - 0 Item #4.A. Old Business - Apple Ponds Development Information Meg McMonigal reviewed the Apple Ponds memo sent to Randy Johnson March 29, 1990. 52 units out of a possible 247 have been platted in this development equaliing 63�. The committee/city should take action to purchase the par�C property when 75� (102) of the allowable detached, single family units have been platted. Ms. McMonigal will check periodically on the progress to keep the committee up to da.te on the development. Item #5. A. New Business - Ceda.r Kno11s Mobile Home Park Request for Additional Park Land Randy Johnson reviewed the series of issues and events that brought the. l0: members of the public to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee meeting tonight. They are interested in the area near 127th Street and Germane Avenue. The area is under consideration for rezoning possibly as commercial or multi-family developments. Meg McMonigal stated that there are some inconsistencies between the zoning and the long-range plans for approximately 50 cases in the city. They are being considered on a case by case situation. The Planning Commission is trying to change either the zoning or the long-range plans or both. The 127th Street and Germane Avenue section is one of those areas. The area is currently zoned retail business, meaning that a 157,000 square foot shopping center could be built on this property. The Planning Department recommends against such a facility because of the traffic impact, it would not be economically viable, and it's not needed in this area. The property owner wants to maintain the retail business zoning. At the last Planning Commission hearing to change part of the land from retail to multiple residential, several members of the public 2 , ` � ' • • -' brought up the issue of a park in this area. They were directed to the Parks & Recreation Advisory Committee meeting. With the Planning Commission's recommendations, the southern area along 127th and west of Germane Avenue would remain retail leaving the small store that is currently there. Access could be either from 127th or Germane. When the developer comes in, the city will do a � traffic count to help determine the best access. 127th Street is considered a neighborhood collection route and traffic counts are not available at this time. Joe McCluskey asked Ms. McMonigal why the Planning Commission is recommending a change from retail business to residential for this area. She responded that the City Council stance is to continue with the downtown effort for a business district. This is one of the iargest population density concentration areas within the ci'ty of Apple Valley with the apartment buildings, townhouses and mobile home park. However, there still remains a lot of open space. The public representatives feel that there is a lot of privately owned open space that is not available to all individuals in the area. Cedar Knolls Park has a tennis court, playground equipment and some heavily wooded land. They are proposing a city park for children ` to play in that is not wooded. Another proposal from people in the area is to include a park-and- ride section for the mass-transit system. Tina Rankin pointed out that apartment building and retail business � zoning is not in the realm of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee. . There are limited funds available for park use and the Committee must consider all parks in the city. They have adopted the national standard of a 1/2 mile radius for parks. Some areas of the city do not have parks yet. People living in the area of the mobile home park have Briar Oaks Park on the north and Cedar Knolls Park on the southeast. Greg Kopischke paraphrased the memo Randy Johnson sent as an informational tool to the Committee on April 12, 1990. He also added that the people in this area also have Pennock Park on the other side of Cedar Avenue. The public representatives were concerned with the traffic flow on 127th street and feel that it is a real safety concern for children having to cross this street to get to a park. Mr: Kopischke stated that the park dedication allows $15,000 per acre for park land. A minimum four to five acre park in this area with land selling for $20,000 would cost approximately $100,000. Land 3 • • .' fees may be more depending on the zoning. One of the representatives asked what the City bases park land requirements on? Ms. McMonigal explained that the City considers the acreage of the residential development t�imes 10$ of the land to find the required " dedication amounts. Technically it would be a Planning Commission issue to require the private community owners to provide additional private park space for highly populated property. The City does take into consideration the area schools and county parks in addition to the city parks. Some of the representative felt like they were tresspassing on private property when they went through the mobile home park to use Cedar Knolls Park and would like to see an easement to Briar Oaks. They feel that Briar Oaks Park is noL easily accessable. Randy Johnson explained that when the land for Briar Oaks was purchased, the City attempted to obtain a right-of-way from the private property owners on the south side of the park, but they rejected the idea. � Mr. Kopischke stated that when the Briar Oaks Park property was under consideration, the Committee struggled with the idea of purchasing the property because of the accessability concern. They also questioned whether the city needed another park in the area. However, they felt there was a need and this park along with Cedar Kno11s Park would provide sufficient area to service the population in this area. Fran Wallin of the public representatives questioned the Gommittee: 1) Do other parks have time stipulations as to how long a person can use the facilities? There are a number of parking spaces at Cedar Knolls Park, but only four are for park users. The others are for park-and-ride users. 2) When planning park amenities, does the Committee plan for children vs, teen/adult use? She believes the only available items at the park include a walking trail, a bar-b- que and a picnic table. Randy Johnson asked the representatives for input as to the items/amenities they would like to see at Cedar Knolls Park. Someone mentioned an archery range. It may be a possibility, if an area could meet the safety requirements. Mr. Johnson stated that there is an archery range at Scott Park. One of the citywide goals for 1990 is to locate other areas for park- and-ride accomodations. Galaxie Parks is another example of the same situation that exists at Cedar Knolls. 4 . ' . � • • Changes probably will not occur until 1991 because of the "Opt Out" of the metropolitan transit program the City is presently considering. Many of the surrounding communities are also involved with the program. . Mr. Johnson pointed out that the people on the Parks & Recreation � Advisory Committee love parks, but reality is that it's very expensive to purchase land. If the owner of the property (127th and Germane) would be willing to donate the land, the City could be willing to accept it. Fran Wallin asked if it would be possible to trade the land from the old bmx bike track at Cedar Knolls Park for the 127th Street and Germane Avenue property. Randy Johnson explained that it would be a difficult process to sell or transfer ownership of any park property, especially if any State or �Federal funds were used to purchase or develop the park. David Gross stated that it seems the first and foremost concern of the residents is the safety of people getting to and from the parks. He suggested that possibly a crosswalk could be instailed, maybe some additional signage for the park. The speed limit which is 35mph could possibly be lowered to 30mph. Additional playground equipment for the Galaxie Avenue and 127th Street area was addressed. Mr. Johnson noted that there is some playground equipment already in the Cedar Knolls Park. Additional equipment could cost approximately $15,000. A good example of 'the new equipment now being installed in the parks would be the Hayes Park playground equipment. That installation cost approximately $12,000 in 1989. A ma�or portion of the manufacturer/installer price is to cover the insurance liabilities for the companies. Mr. Johnson will pursue the idea of an easement for the Briar Oaks park with the private property owners along Geneva Way again. John DiRico asked if there were not sidewalks along Galaxie Avenue. He does not consider a 1/4 to 1/2 mile walk along the sidewalk as unaccessability to a park. Cedar Knolls encompasses 10.3 acres that is under-utilized. Carol Valentine of the public representatives stated that better access and upgrading the area for safety would be an advantage. Mr. DiRico asked that Randy Johnson contact the Public Works Department for the needed repairs to the sidewalk and additional signage along the street noting the area as a park. 5 • • � - � . -' Mr. Johnson asked the representatives what kind of amenities they would like to see in the Cedar Knolls Park. They responded with; swings, open land for a play field. If they have additional ideas or suggestions after they poll the neighbors in the near future, they should address a note to Randy Johnson of the Parks and Recreation Department for the Gity. In comparing the 1/2 mile radius standard for parks to the school districts requirements for students walking to school, elementary children are walking 1/2 mile to schools everyday. Bus service is not available to students living 1/2 mile or less from their neighborhood school. Mr. Kopischke thanked the members of the public for attending the meeting and told them that the Committee appreciates public input on park issues. He explained the Comp Plan and the public hearings that were held to discuss the five-year plan before it was adopted by the City Council in February. Even with the notices posted throughout the community, no one from the public appeared at the hearings to discuss the Comp Plan. Mr, Kopischke asked David Gross to xeview his list of items that the Advisory Committee and Randy Johnson will be checking into for the areas in question. 1.) 127th Street adding some park signage� possibly a crosswalk, and lower the speed limit to 30 mph. 2.) Park signage on the west side of Cedar Knolls Park. 3.) Continue with the grading, upgrade and enhance the Cedar Knolls Park as we have been doing. 4.) Have the City check into the easement for Briar Oaks Park again. Mr. Johnson's best guess for the location of the easement would be through the apartment building complex near the swing set. Mr. DiRico read over the amenities already located at some of the other parks within the city: outdoor volleyball courts, horseshoe pits, exercise trails, basketball courts, picnic shelters, etc. Carol Valentine asked the Committee to encourage the Planning � Department to return the parking spaces at Cedar Knolls Park to the park users from the park-and-ride users. Ms. McMonigal assured the public representatives that it is already an issue with the City Council and tonight's information will be available to the Planning Commission at Wednesday, April 18, 1990. Ms. Valentine recommended that rather than a retail business in the 127th Street and Germane Avenue area, maybe making that a park-and- 6 . '. . • • • . ride would be a better use. The park-and-ride parking could then be removed from the other city parks. Mr. Kopischke stated that there are a number of issues to be explored; will the property owners grant the easement for Briar 0aks and at what cost? Where to find the funds to construct a trail from 123rd Street to Gantry? The easement could probably be done with a l0 foot width, though 20 feet would be better. Mr. McCluskey said that the people from Cedar Knolls mobile home park have a tremendous interest in these two parks, but he`s not aware of anyone that has contacted the mobile home park management yet. Mr. Johnson asked the representatives to sign the visitor sheet and leave their addresses. He will send a memo to them within a month with a response to the questions raised this evening. As the representatives were leaving the meeting, Mario Vaca delivered to Randy Johnson a petition that the group ,has circulated through the neighborhood. ' : Chairperson Kopischke made the motion on the items discussed. MOTION: by Greg Kopischke, seconded by Ann Wyllie recommending against acquiring either by purchase of by donation any land in the area in discussion. VOTE: Yes - 5, No - 0 Meg McMonigal distributed a copy of a letter addressed to Mayor Branning from Diane Vaca. It states the resident's �ustifications for having a park and a park-and-ride in the area of 127th and Germane Avenue. Item #5. B. New Business - Verbal Report on Pennock Corridor Zoning and Park Requests Randy Johnson reported that the development of the Pennock Avenue property (Mrs. Schultz's property) came up at the City Council meeting on March 22. With some pressure from the public and from the developer, the Council has decided that a park may not be needed in this development. They sent direction to the Planning Department to develop the plat with a street through the develapment, but not showing any park property. The Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee has recommended at least a four or five acre park for this development. Many of the residents have called the Parks and Recreation Department wanting to know when the park will be completed. 7 • • ' . ,' . Tom Goodwin will present an alternative to the City Council recommending at least a smaller park (possibly 2 acres) for the development. Possibly located on Pennock Avenue south of Harwell Path. The next City Council meeting is scheduled for April 2b, 1990. Item #6. . Other Randy Johnson distributed copies of the new park booklet for the Committee's information. Tony Martinez is credited with the park drawings from aerial photos. Three ring binder books are available in the Recreation office for Committee members for their Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee '� 1990 information. Greg Kopischke asked about Newell Park changes in terms of other uses. Randy Johnson stated that the Committee needs to come up with some suggestion items. There �should not be an problems with adding different amenities to the park. Item #6. B Other - Update on Bike Pathways Randy Johnson reviewed the information from the bike pathway meeting held earlier in the day with the County Commissioners. The city councils from Apple Valley, Eagan, Burnsville and Rosemount adopted similar resolutions recommending no changes to the current bikeway system plans. The County Commissioners voted 6 to l to stay with the existing plans to build off-road bikeways and have the cities provide the funds for maintenance of the bikeways. Tina Rankin asked if there was ever going to be a bike trail in the Cedar Knolls area. Meg McMonigal said she believed that it was planned, but she would check into it. Palomino is a county road. When 38 is designated to the county, it will bring Palomino to a city street. 127th is a city street. I tem #7. Adj ourn MOTION: by Ann Wyllie, seconded by Charlie Maus to adjourn the meeting at 9:47pm. VOTE: Yes - 3, No - 0 8