HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/18/1989 �R t
� �
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE
April 18, 1989
Minutes of the Apple Valley Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee
heid April 18, 1989, at the Apple Valley Community Center.
PRESENT: Chairperson Greg Kopischke; Committee Members Russell,
DeFauw (8:10 p.m. arrival) , John DiRico, Dave Gross,
Charlie Maus, Tina Rankin, Ann Wyllie; Parks and
Recreation Director Randy Johnson; Assistant City
Planner Meg McMonigal; Park Superintendent Tom Wahl.
ABSENT: NQ ONE.
1. Chair Kopischke called the meeting to order at 7:40 p.m.
2. Approval of Agenda.
MOTION: of Gross, seconded by Rankin, to approve the agenda
for the meeting as presented.
VOTE: Yes, 6; No, 0.
3. Approval of Minutes of March, 1989.
Please note: Page 3, Item 6. B. Hayes Community Center
should be Apple Valley Community Center. The word "knout"
should be added to line 10.
Page 4, Item 8. Hayes should be Apple Valley Community
Center.
MOTION: of Gross, seconded by Wyllie, to approve the
Minutes of March 21, 1989, as corrected.
VOTE: Yes, 6; No, 0.
4. New Business.
A. Mission Statement.
Committee Members reviewed the draft Mission Statement
of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee as
presented by Mr. Johnson.
Suggested changes were:
Reword Item 2. to read--To ascertain citizen needs and interests
and recommend, review, and develop programs, facilities and
services to serve their needs.
Reword Item 3. to read--To interpret the value of recreation and
parks in order to gain and promote the public's interest,
understanding and supgort.
Committee Members complimented Mr. Johnson for this well-written
statement. Ms. Rankin particularly liked it because the goals
are reasonable and could be accomplished.
MOTION: of Rankin, seconded by Gross, to recommend acceptance
of the draft Mission Statement of the Parks and
. 2 • �
PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY CQI�Il�IITTEE MINUTES
April 18, 1989
Page 2
Recreation Advisory Committee with the noted changes.
VOTE: Yes, 6; No, 0.
B. Comprehensive Guide Plan Update.
Ms. McMonigal and Mr. Johnson indicated the needed for
reviewing the old,goals as stated in F. Community Facilties
and G. Parks and Open Spaces Chapters of the Comprehensive
Guide Plan.
Following are the meeting dates established to accomplish
this needed update:
May 16
June 20
July (skip)
August 15
September 19.
Updated goals will be included in the "Parks Chapter" of the
Comprehensive Plan.
Item F. , page II-6, Second paragraph, the goal beginning
with the word "Thirdly" is really the only applicable
goal at this time. Ms. Rankin indicated that she would
like to see terminology included that would indicate
COOPERATION with ISD #196 so that these two government
bodies could work together for the common interest
of the citizens of Apple Valley.
It was noted that any items appropriate in F. would be
included in part G.
Item G. Parks and Open Space, second paragraph, emphasis
should be given to maintenance and enhancement of facilities.
A fifth item should be added: Programming.
Number 4--This should be clarified.
Members are urged to think of other facilities needed; for
example, a second sheet of ice. There is a need to ascertain
what the needs truly are that can be accomplished along with
remembering what has been accomplished already.
Part VII--PARK DEVELOPMENT GUIDE should be reviewed at the
May 16 meeting. A tour to include one of each type of
park and two neighborhood parks will be included.
Chair Kopischke expressed eoncern that a GRAPHIC DESIGNATION
of TRAILS for the entire City be included in the Comprehensive
Plan. This should be COMPLETE to include all potential links
and to show interfacing with Rosemount and Lakeville.
� � � - • i
PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY CONIl�iITTEE MINUTES
April 18, 1989
Page 3
5. Old Business
A. Most recent proposal from Mr. Mauer regarding
housing development (Oaks IV) .
Ms. McMonigal indicated that Mr. Mauer would
present the sketch plan for Oaks IV at the
Planning Commission Meeting on April 19, 1989.
It will be recommendedthat he dedicate the
required 1.3 acres with the possibility that
the City could purchase additional land from
the 13.1 acres.
Committee Members are VERY CONCERNED that
since there is no park in that area and
the need for one is severe, that the 30 acres
be considered in total in order to have
the necessary three-acre park in that area.
Mr. Gross and Mr. DiRico felt that a
park located across from Harwell Path
would be a much better location for reasons of
safety, accessibility, centrally located, topography.
There is a REAL NEED for a park in this area; this
would be the last opportunity to established the
needed facilities for those families. Developing
Lots 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 along with the three outlots
would provide an adequate 3-acre park with the needed
accessibility/visibility. An open play area should be
included. Mr. Johnson reported many calls from families
already in that area for park facilities and particularly
in the winter for an ice skating rink. This is an
EXCEPTIONAL SITUATION--a last opportunity for a park--
and as much land as possible should be received as
park dedication with the application of Park Dedication
Funds to purchase the needed remaining land. Cash in lieu
would be received from the other properties in the exception
areas as they develop.
There is a definite DEMONSTRATED NEED for open space in that
area for a park.
MOTION: of Gross, seconded by Wyllie, to recommend to the
Gity Council that the 10� Park Dedication for the
Oaks IV Development be received as LAND and that
additional land would be purchased so that
Lots 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and that the outlot areas
adjacent to the south could be developed as a park
in that location because of COI�iUNITY NEEDS, SAFETY,
and this is the ONLY SUITABLE LAND LEFT in this area.
. . . . � �
PARKS AND REGREATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES
April 18, 1989
Page 4
The Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee futher
recommends aggressively pursuing the use
of Park Dedication Funds for the additional
land purchase because of the uniqueness of
the opportunity to acquire land in this area;
the trade off would be to receive cash-in-lieu
as the southern parcels develop to replinish
_ Park Dedication Funds.
VOTE: Yes, 7; No, 0 .
B. Update on Development Fees Comparison.
Ms. McMonigal presented a very helpful Development
Fees Comparison between Apple Valley, Burnsville,
Eagan, and Laleeville. The attempt continues to
be made to contact Rosemount.
Based on a sample pro�ect for all the communities,
overall fees in Apple Valley were third out of the
four: Eagan (first) , Lakeville, Apple Valley, Burnsville.
Based on an average of 10 acres of Commercial and Industrial
Development per year, $7,500 could be collected in
Park Dedication Fees. Of particular concern would be
the development along CR 42 and Cedar Ave.
MOTION: of Gross, seconded by Rankin, that based on the
latest Development Fees Comparison as presented
by Ms. McMonigal, the Parks and Recreation
Advisory Committee is adamantly in support
of collecting the 5$ Park Dedication Fee for
Commercial and Industrial Development and
would like to see this implemented as soon
as possible. ,
VOTE: Yes, 7; No, 0.
6. Staff Reports.
A. Park Maintenance Division--Park Superintendent Tom Wahl.
1. A brief review of the park maintenance work
program for 1989 was presented. There are sixteen
full-time employees. Mr. Wahl reviewed the various
activities his department is reponsible for. Mr. Johnson
was high complimentary of the outstanding work Mr. Wahl
and his employees peform for the City. Mr. Wahl continues
to accomplish many major projects "in house" thus saving
a lot of money for the City.
, , . , � .
PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISOItTY COMMITTEE MINUTES
April 18, 1989 `
Page 5
2. Verbal Update on Bond Issue Pro,jects.
Eastview Athletic Complex--Grand Opening Celebration,
Saturday, May 6, 1989, 6:30-9:00 p.m. Letters will
be sent to supporters specifically inviting them
to this celebration.
7. Group photo to be published in the Summer Parks and Recreation
Brochure was taken; the entire Committee was present.
8. Other.
No other issues were discussed.
9, Adjourn.
MOTION: of Gross, seconded by Rankin, to adjourn the meeting at
10:15 p.m.