The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About12/08/2022 Meeting :.L ••••• Meeting Location: Municipal Center Apple 7100 147th Street West Valley Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124 December 8, 2022 CITY COUNCIL INFORMAL MEETING TENTATIVE DISCUSSION ITEMS 5:30 PM 1. Council Discussion Items (10 min.) 2. Discuss 2023 Legislative Policies (45 min.) 3. Adjourn CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING TENTATIVE AGENDA 7:00 PM 1. Call to Order and Pledge 2. Approve Agenda 3. Audience - 10 Minutes Total Time Limit - For Items NOT on this Agenda 4. Approve Consent Agenda Items Consent Agenda Items are considered routine and will be enacted with a single motion, without discussion, unless a councilmember or citizen requests to have any item separately considered. It will then be moved to the regular agenda for consideration. A. Approve Minutes of November 18, 2022, Special Meeting B. Approve Minutes of November 22, 2022, Regular Meeting C. Adopt Resolution Accepting Donation from Dakota County Heroes for Use by Apple Valley Police Depailiiient K-9 Program D. Approve Renewal of 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor Licenses for 2023 E. Adopt Resolution Setting Public Hearing, at 7:00 p.m. on January 12, 2023, for New On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor and Special License for Sunday Liquor Sales, for QRA Enterprise, LLC, d/b/a X-Golf Apple Valley, 7541 148th Street W. F. Adopt Resolution Setting Public Hearing, at 7:00 p.m. on January 12, 2023, for New Concessionaire On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor and Special License for Sunday Liquor Sales for SSA Group, LLC, 13000 Zoo Boulevard G. Adopt Resolution Establishing Precinct Boundaries and Polling Places for 2023 Elections H. 2023 City Council Meeting Schedule 1. Set 2023 City Council Regular Meeting Schedule 2. Set Special Informal Meeting on April 14, 2023, at 8:30 a.m. at Valleywood Golf and Events I. Adopt Resolution Adopting Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan J. Adopt Resolution Decertifying Tax Increment Financing District No. 14 K. Approve Reduction of Natural Resources Management Permit Financial Guarantees L. Approve Reduction of Various Financial Guarantees M. Apple Valley Fire Station#2 & Improvements to #1 & #3 1. Adopt Resolution Awarding Various Contracts 2. Adopt Resolution Rejecting Bids for Bid Category 3B - Precast Concrete N. Adopt Resolution Levying Special Assessments Roll No. 687 for Pahl Family Limited Partnership II O. Approve Assessment Agreement-Trunk Charges with Pahl Family Limited Partnership II for Pahl's Market at 6885 160th Street W. P. Approve Stormwater Maintenance Agreement with Pahl Family Limited Partnership II for Pahl's Market at 6885 160th Street W. Q. Approve Agreement with AVI Systems, Inc., for Purchase and Delivery of Audio & Video Equipment R. Approve Community Waste Abatement 2023 Grant Agreement with Dakota County and Cities of Apple Valley, Burnsville, Eagan, and Lakeville S. Approve Acceptance and Final Payment on Agreement with Swedebro, Inc., for Apple Valley Police Facility Concrete Flooring T. Approve Personnel Report U. Approve Claims and Bills 5. Regular Agenda Items A. 2023 City Budget and Property Tax Levy 1. Conduct the Truth in Taxation Budget Meeting 2. Adopt Resolution Approving 2023 City Budget and Tax Levy B. Adopt Resolution Authorizing Transfers from the Liquor Fund for 2022 C. Adopt Resolution Approving Site Plan/Building Permit Authorization to Construct 7,920 Sq. Ft. Retail Building for Schuler Shoes on Lot 2, Block 1, LB at Orchard Place D. Apple Valley Square 7th Addition, Popeyes Restaurant 1. Adopt Resolution Approving Apple Valley Square 7th Addition Preliminary Plat 2. Adopt Resolution Approving Variance for Required Number of Parking Stalls 3. Adopt Resolution Approving Conditional Use Permit for Class II Restaurant with Drive-Through Window and Variance to Reduce Required Separation Distance for Class II Restaurant from Residential Use 4. Adopt Resolution Approving Site Plan/Building Permit Authorization to Construct 2,519 Sq. Ft. Restaurant E. City Fee Schedule 1. Hold Public Hearing 2. Adopt Resolution Approving the Fee Schedule, Effective January 1, 2023 6. Staff and Council Communications 7. Approve Calendar of Upcoming Events 8. Closed Session A. Convene in Closed Session, Under Exception to Open Meeting Law, to Develop or Consider Offers or Counteroffers for the Possible Purchase of Real Property Identified as Parcel ID Number 01-47900-01-010 9. Adjourn Regular meetings are broadcast, live, on Charter Communications Cable Channel 180 and on the City's website at www.cityofapplevalley.org • ITEM: 2. ..... :�. Appleil COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 8, 2022 Valley SECTION: Informal Agenda Item Description: Discuss 2023 Legislative Policies (45 min.) Staff Contact: Department/ Division: Tom Lawell, City Administrator Administration Department ACTION REQUESTED: No formal action is requested at this time. This informal agenda item is intended to begin the conversation about the upcoming Minnesota legislative session and to discuss topics of interest to the City of Apple Valley. SUMMARY: The 2023 legislative session is scheduled to begin on January 3, 2023 and is expected to end on May 22, 2023. Actions taken by the legislature can directly impact cities and it is important that we monitor legislative activity and advocate in favor of or against policies which might impact our community. As the Council is aware, the City of Apple Valley is a member of three separate organizations that work to advance legislative topics of interest to cities. These include the League of Minnesota Cities, Metro Cities, and the Municipal Legislative Commission. The purpose of this memorandum is to share with you the various adopted legislative policies of each organization and to highlight a number of issues of particular interest to Apple Valley. Feedback from the City Council is important and will help guide our legislative advocacy work in 2023. BACKGROUND: Throughout the summer, the three identified groups convened multiple policy review committees to consider policies for the upcoming session. Attached please find the draft policies recommended by each organization. These documents include: 1) League of Minnesota Cities 2023 Legislative Policies (Adopted November 10, 2022) - Green Paper 2) Metro Cities 2022 Legislative Policies (Adopted November 17, 2022) White Paper 3) Municipal Legislative Commission 2023 Legislative Platform (Draft discussed on November 29, 2022) - Yellow Paper Staff has prepared the attached draft list of recommended 2023 legislative policy priorities and core legislative principles for your consideration. In addition, the attachment describes four projects for possible inclusion in the State's 2023 bonding bill: • 147th Street Station Skybridge Project • Inclusive Playground Project • Fire Station#2 Replacement • Police Garage Operations Project. Looking ahead, at our January 12, 2023 informal meeting, we hope to have our local legislative delegation in attendance to further discuss the legislative session and the City's priorities. Those legislators invited to attend the January 12 meeting are State Senator Erin Maye Quade, State Representative Robert Bierman and State Representative John Huot. In addition, the Municipal Legislative Commission (MLC) will host its annual Legislative Breakfast Meeting on Friday, February 17, at the Eagan Community Center from 8:00 to 10:00 a.m. BUDGET IMPACT: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Policy Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Presentation •••• ••'•• City of Apple Valley DRAFT Apple Legislative Policy Priorities for 202 Homestead Market Value Exclusion In 2011, the legislature repealed the existing homestead market value credit program and replaced it with a new Homestead Market Value exclusion. Under the homestead market value exclusion, an amount equal to 40 percent of the assessor's estimate of the home's market value for a home up to $76,000 in market value is excluded from taxation. For homes in excess of$76,000 of market value, the exclusion phases out as home values increase until it is totally phased out for homes over$413,800. The general parameters of the program have not changed since 2011. The median home value in Apple Valley in 2011 was $203,200 and many homeowners qualified for a significant value exclusion from taxation. In 2022 the median home value in Apple Valley is $352,800 and the value of the program is greatly diminished. Due to the recent rapid increase in home values, the City supports modifications to the homestead market value exclusion program to increase the benefit of the exclusion to qualifying homeowners and to further promote home ownership in the community. Sales Tax Exemption on Construction Materials Support legislation to streamline the process required for cities to secure the sales tax exemption on construction materials. This is especially important as the City has significant capital projects planned in upcoming years to support Police, Fire, Public Works and Parks & Recreation services. Transportation Funding Support the construction of the missing northbound third lane on Cedar Avenue, and pedestrian safety improvements on Cedar Avenue including the installation of a pedestrian skyway at the 147th Street Station. Support stable and sufficient transportation funding for state and local roads and support the Transportation Economic Development Program and the Corridors of Commerce Program that provide competitive grants for transportation construction projects. Support a balanced transportation package for roads, bridges and transit, including investments in suburban areas. Fully fund the required state matching dollars to leverage federal grant opportunities for programs including the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act and the Inflation Reduction Act. Development Fees and Housing Support legislation that gives cities local control and the ability to impose infrastructure and permit fees sufficient to ensure that development standards are fully met and the cost of new development is not shifted onto existing taxpayers. The City supports fees and regulations necessary for new development to pay for itself. The City supports affordable home ownership programs that will help increase funding to support the preservation of naturally occurring affordable housing (NOAH) in the community. We also support the preservation of home ownership opportunities in our single family neighborhoods and are concerned by national investor firms buying up single family homes and converting them to rental property. Many of these homes being purchased are older, more affordable homes which could go to young families who hope to build equity and move up the economic ladder. Alcohol Distribution and Control Oppose legislation that would expand the sale of alcohol in grocery stores and other retail establishments. Such expansion would increase the likelihood of drunk driving and underage alcohol sales and consumption and would also have a detrimental economic impact on current off- sale retailers, including the City of Apple Valley. ••••• City of Apple Valley DRAFT Apple Valley Legislative Policy Priorities for 2023 Regulation of Cannabinoid Products In 2022, the legislature passed legislation that authorized the sale of certain edibles and beverages infused with tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) extracted from hemp. Cities were not consulted during the drafting of this legislation and have significant concerns that need to be addressed. Though the new law has some regulations on the products, there are significant gaps in state oversight and accountability for the manufacturing, testing, and distribution of the products. Additionally, the law does not provide any restrictions on where the products can be sold and offers no guidance for local governments to regulate the sale of the products. The new law increases enforcement responsibilities for local governments which will result in additional costs for cities. It now appears the Governor and legislature may consider legalizing adult-use cannabis during the 2023 session. Cities must be included in the discussion to ensure that the state regulatory framework includes clear licensing, inspection, and enforcement provisions related to the cultivation, manufacturing, distribution, sales and taxation of cannabinoid products. Modernize Data Practices Act Support changes to the Minnesota Data Practices Act to reflect today's data intensive environment, protect municipalities from abusive or harassing requests and to compensate municipalities for overly broad and burdensome requests. Electric Charging Stations on Public Property Increasingly vehicles that are powered by electricity are being offered by manufacturers as an alternative to gas-powered vehicles. The City has begun adding electric vehicles to its fleet and plans to add more in the future. The City installed an electric vehicle charging station at the Apple Valley Municipal Center to accommodate the City's charging needs. The charging station is also made available for public use for a fee, and it has become increasingly popular. We have explored adding similar charging stations at other City facilities, but state law is currently vague regarding a city's ability to offer such services to the public. We urge the legislature to provide clarity on the topic. Emerald Ash Borer Grant Assistance Emerald ash borer (EAB) is a destructive insect that has already killed millions of ash trees in the US. It was discovered in Apple Valley in 2015 and the City has aggressively addressed the issue by removing many ash trees and replanting a more diverse urban forest throughout the City, however we still have a long ways to go. We support the provision of state funding to support our forestry efforts as we respond to this EAB insect infestation. Emergency Medical Services The City of Apple Valley, in partnership with the cities of Lakeville and Farmington, have jointly provided advanced life support ambulance service to its residents through the joint powers entity known as ALF Ambulance since 1986. In 2008 ALF Ambulance entered into an agreement with Allina Medical Transportation to provide ambulance service within the ALF Primary Service Area as defined in the Emergency Medical Service License issued to ALF Ambulance by the Emergency Medical Services Regulatory Board (EMSRB). The structure and governance of the EMSRB may undergo legislative revision in 2023. The City opposes any revisions that would impact the ability of ALF Ambulance to continue to operate its ambulance service into the future. ••• r •••• ••••• •••• City of Apple Valley DRAFT AppVa II lley 2023 Bonding Requests 147t" Street Inclusive Fire Station #2 Police Garage Station Playground Replacement Operations Skybridge Project Project Project Project Total Projec L$8,250,45 $1,381,380 $15,005,000 $11,737,000 Cost 71. 50% State $4,125,228 $690,690 $7,502,500 $5,868,500 Bonding Grant Request rrii "•' City of Apple Valley DRAFT AppValley Core Legislative Principle - Local Control Local Mayors and City Councilmembers are duly elected by their citizens and are in the best position to make decisions on behalf of their community. They are accountable for their decisions. State legislative decisions should reflect this understanding and local officials should be allowed to do the jobs they have been elected to do. Unfunded Mandates The imposition of state mandates and programs on local governments without the provision of state funding is contrary to the concept of local control. Excessive reporting requirements should be identified and eliminated. Any function or activity mandated by the State upon local governments should be fully and continuously funded by the State. Spending and Tax Lids The imposition of taxing or spending limits on local governments is contrary to the spirit and effectiveness of our system of representative government. Local tax and spending policy decisions should be made locally. Blanket limitations imposed statewide will have unintended consequences and will affect the ability to deliver essential public services. Preserve Local Government Revenues The legislature should not withhold or seek to otherwise divert local funds into the State General Fund. Local policy makers must have the ability to generate and save sufficient revenues to cover the cost of day-to-day service delivery, as well as future capital costs. Job Creation and Promotion of Economic Growth The economic success of our state is tied directly to the economic success of our cities. Building strong cities takes a long-range coordinated effort that allows local leaders to make local economic development decisions based their communities' vision for the future. The legislature should seek to maximize the number and type of economic development tools available to cities. Collaboration and Cooperation Local government jurisdictions within Dakota County have a long history of collaborating on ways to effectively and efficiently deliver necessary public services. The legislature should promote best management practices and provide incentives to further joint and collaborative practices around the state. LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 2023 C • ty Poi • ,, • es For Legislative and Administrative Action Adopted November 10, 2022 The only comprehensive statewide advocacy agenda for all Minnesota cities LMCLEAGUE MINNESOTA CITIES This document is available in the Legislative Action Center on the League's website at www.lmc.org/policies Copyright © 2022 League of Minnesota Cities. All rights reserved. L..M C LEAGUE of League Minnesota Cities M I N N E S O TA 145 W University Avenue West • St. Paul,MN 55103-2044 (651) 281-1200 • (800) 925-1122 • Fax: (651)281-1299 CITIES TDD: (651)281-1290 • www.lmc.org Table of Contents COVER 1 IGR STAFF PAGE 8 COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP 9 LMC POLICY DEVELOPMENT PROCESS 13 PURPOSE, PROCESS AND PRINCIPLES OF CITY POLICIES 14 IMPROVING SERVICE DELIVERY 15 SD- 1. Local Control 15 SD- 2. Unfunded Mandates 15 SD- 3. Local Approval of Special Laws 15 SD- 4. Redesigning and Reinventing Government 16 SD- 5. State Government Shutdowns 17 SD- 6. Duration of Conservation Easements 18 SD- 7. Racial Equity in Minnesota 18 SD- 8. Immigration Reform 20 SD- 9. Responsibility for Locating Private Underground Facilities 20 SD- 10. Utility Relocation Under Design-Build Road Construction 21 SD- 11. National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standards 22 SD- 12. Fire Mutual Aid 22 SD- 13. Clarification of Joint Powers Relationships with Federally Recognized Indian Tribes 23 SD- 14. Ambulance Service Costs and Liability 23 SD- 15. Emergency Medical Services 24 SD- 16. Fees for Service 25 SD-17. Fundraising Authority 25 SD- 18. Improving and Increasing Citizen Access to Information 26 SD- 19. Administrative Fines for Code Violations 27 SD- 20. Contracting and Purchasing 28 SD- 21. City Enterprise Operations 28 SD- 22. Preservation of Order in City Council Meetings 28 SD- 23. Constitutional Amendments 29 SD- 24. Initiative and Referendum 29 SD- 25. Civil Liability of Local Governments 30 SD- 26. Private Property Rights and Takings 30 SD- 27. Organized Solid Waste Collection 31 SD- 28. Private Well Drilling 32 SD- 29. Sustainable Development 33 SD-30. Advanced Energy Building Standards 34 SD- 31. Construction Codes 35 SD-32. Building Officials 36 3 SD-33. Disability Access Requirements 37 SD-34. Assaults on Code Enforcement Officials 38 SD- 35. Restrictions on Possession of Firearms 39 SD-36. Public Safety Communications 39 SD- 37. Collateral Consequences and Expungements 40 SD-38. Criminal and Juvenile Justice Information 41 SD- 39. Pawn Shop Regulation and Use of the Automated Property System (APS) 42 SD- 40. City Costs for Enforcing State and Local Laws 43 SD- 41. Compensation and Reimbursement for Public Safety Services 44 SD- 42. Administrative Traffic Citations 44 SD- 43. Juveniles in Municipal Jails 45 SD- 44. Justice System Funding 45 SD- 45. 21st Century Policing 46 SD- 46. Post-Incarceration Living Facilities 47 SD- 47. Homeland Security Costs and Liability 48 SD- 48. Cybersecurity 48 SD- 49. Legalization of Fireworks 49 SD- 50. Traffic Enforcement Cameras 50 SD- 51. Operation of Motorized Foot Scooters 50 SD- 52. Catalytic Converter Theft 51 SD- 53. Drug Courts 51 SD- 54. Drug Paraphernalia 52 SD- 55. Regulation of Massage Therapists 52 SD- 56. Regulation of Cannabinoid Products 53 SD- 57. Lawful Gambling and Local Control 55 SD- 58. Liquor Liability Insurance Limits 56 SD- 59. On-Sale Liquor or Wine Licenses 56 SD- 60. Liquor Licensing of Non-Contiguous Spaces 56 SD- 61. Wine and Off-Sale Licenses 57 SD- 62. Youth Access to Alcohol and Tobacco 57 SD- 63. Consumer Small Loans 58 SD- 64. Regulation of Mobile Businesses 58 SD- 65. Regulation of Party Buses and Boats-for-Hire 59 SD- 66. Environmental Protection 60 SD- 67. Impaired Waters 62 SD- 68. Municipal Public Water Supplies 63 SD- 69. Municipal Electric Utilities 64 SD- 70. State Support for Municipal Energy Policy Goals 65 SD- 71. Urban Forest Management Funding 66 SD- 72. City Pesticide Application Authority 67 SD- 73. Election Issues 67 SD-74. Administering Absentee Balloting 68 SD- 75. Loss of Felon Voting Rights 69 SD- 76. Write-in Candidates in City Elections 70 SD- 77. Ranked Choice Voting 70 SD- 78. Voter Assistance 71 4 SD- 79. Electronic Rosters 71 SD- 80. Election Judge Recruitment and Retention 72 SD -81. Mail Balloting 73 SD-82. Modernizing Charter Amendment Process 73 SD-83. Presidential Nomination Primary 73 SD-84. Health Care Facility Voting 74 SD-85. Voters Experiencing Homelessness 75 SD-86. Voter Registration 75 IMPROVING LOCAL ECONOMIES 77 LE- 1. Growth Management and Annexation 77 LE- 2. Wildlife Management Areas 78 LE-3. Official State Mapping Responsibility 79 LE- 4. Electric Service Extension 79 LE- 5. Statutory Approval Timelines 79 LE- 6. Maintenance of Retaining Walls Adjacent to Public Rights of Way 81 LE- 7. Development Disputes 81 LE- 8. Foreclosure and Neighborhood Stabilization 82 LE- 9. Housing Policy 84 LE- 10. Resources for Affordable Housing 85 LE- 11. Greater Minnesota Housing 87 LE- 12. Energy Efficiency Improvement Requirements for Housing 89 LE- 13. In-Home Day Care Facilities 90 LE- 14. Residential Programs 90 LE- 15. Inclusionary Housing 91 LE- 16. Community Land Trusts 92 LE- 17. Telecommunications and Information Technology 92 LE- 18. Broadband 93 LE- 19. Competitive Cable Franchising Authority 95 LE- 20. Public Right-of-Way Management 96 LE- 21. Wireless Infrastructure and Equipment Siting 98 LE- 22. County Economic Development Authorities 98 LE- 23. Local Appropriations to Economic Development Organizations 98 LE- 24. Workforce Readiness 99 LE- 25. Business Development Programs 99 LE- 26. Remediation and Redevelopment 100 LE- 27. Development Authority Levy Limits 101 LE- 28. Tax Increment Financing (TIF) 101 LE- 29. Property Tax Abatement Authority 102 LE-30. Opportunity Zones 103 LE-31. Revisions to the OSA Audit Function 104 LE-32. OSA Time Limitations 105 LE-33. Workforce Housing 105 LE-34. Development Along Transit Corridors 107 LE-35. Authority to Create Public Infrastructure Utilities 107 LE-36. Adequate Funding for Transportation 108 LE-37. Turnbacks of County and State Roads 109 5 LE- 38. MnDOT Rights-of-Way Maintenance 110 LE-39. Funding for Non-Municipal State Aid City Streets 110 LE- 40. Authority to Allow Amenities in MnDOT Rights-of-Way 111 LE- 41. Complete Streets 112 LE- 42. Authority to Implement Infrastructure Fees 112 LE- 43. Safe Routes to School Grants Management 112 LE- 44. Railroads 113 LE- 45. Airport Planning and Funding 114 LE- 46. Airport Safety Zones 115 HUMAN RESOURCES & DATA PRACTICES 117 HR-1. Personnel Mandates and Limits on Local Control 117 HR-2. Earned Sick and Safe Time 117 HR-3. Pay Equity Compliance 118 HR-4. Public Employment Labor Relations Act(PELRA) 118 HR-5. Implications of Janus v. AFSCME 119 HR-6. Public Employment Relations Board 120 HR-7. Essential Employees 121 HR-8. Re-employment Benefits 121 HR-9. Public Employee Defined Benefit Pension Plans 121 HR-10. Deferred Compensation 124 HR-11. State Paid Police and Fire Medical Insurance 125 HR-12. Health Care Insurance Programs 126 HR-13. Workers' Compensation 127 HR-14. Public Safety Duty Disability 128 HR-15. Drug and Alcohol Testing in the Workplace 130 HR-16. Veterans Preference 130 HR-17. Military Leave Reimbursement 131 HR-18. Tele-Health Exams 132 Data Practices 132 DP-1. Data Practices Compliance Costs 132 DP-2. Records Retention Compliance Costs 134 DP-3. Updating the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act 134 DP-4. Maintaining Government Data in Large Databases 135 DP-5. Sharing of Student Data with Local Law Enforcement in Emergencies 135 DP-6. Disclosure of Victim Data 136 DP-7. Challenges to the Accuracy of Data 136 DP-8. Law Enforcement Technologies 137 DP-9. Body-Worn Cameras 138 DP-10. Open Meeting Law 139 DP-11. Needed Closed Meeting Exceptions to the Open Meeting Law 139 DP-12. Remote Participation under the Open Meeting Law 140 Federal Employment Law 141 FED-1. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA) 141 FED-2. Flexible Spending Accounts 142 FED-3. IRS Regulations on Death Benefits 142 FED-4. Federal Public Safety Collective Bargaining Bill 142 6 FED-5. Federal Health Care Reform 143 FED-6. Amended Internal Revenue Code Regarding 403(b) Retirement Plans 143 FED-7. Amended Internal Revenue Code Regarding Health Savings Account Eligibility and Medicare Enrollment 144 IMPROVING FISCAL FUTURES 145 FF- 1. State-Local Fiscal Relations 145 FF- 2. State Budget Stability 146 FF-3. Funding Local Government Aid 146 FF- 4. State Charges for Administrative Services 148 FF- 5. Reporting Requirements 148 FF- 6. Taxation Duplication 149 FF- 7. Direct Property Tax Relief Programs 150 FF- 8. Sales Tax on Local Government Purchases 150 FF- 9. Taxation of Electronic Commerce 151 FF- 10. Local Lodging Taxes 151 FF- 11. Taxation of Electric Generation Personal Property 152 FF- 12. Electric Generation Taxation Reform 152 FF- 13. Support for Transitioning Communities 153 FF- 14. Taxation of Municipal Bond Interest 154 FF- 15. Pollution Control Exemption 154 FF- 16. Representative Democracy and Local Control 155 FF- 17. Tax Hearing and Notification Process 156 FF- 18. General Election Requirement for Ballot Questions 156 FF- 19. City Fund Balances 157 FF- 20. Local Option Sales Tax and City Revenue Diversification 157 FF- 21. City Franchise Authority 159 FF- 22. Utility Valuation Transition Aid 160 FF- 23. State Assistance for Property Tax Refunds for State-Assessed Property 160 FF- 24. Transition for Property Acquired by Tax-Exempt Entities 161 FF- 25. Payments for Services to Tax-Exempt Property 161 FF- 26. Housing Improvement Areas and Special Service Districts Petitioned by Business 161 FF- 27. Tax-Forfeited Properties and Local Special Assessments 162 FF- 28. Distribution of Proceeds from the Sale of Tax-Forfeit Property 163 FF- 29. State Hazard Mitigation and Response Support 164 FF-30. Library Funding 164 FF- 31. Park and Library Land Tax Break 166 FF-32. Increasing Safe School Levy Authority 166 FF-33. Equitable Funding of Community Education Services 167 FF-34. Street Reconstruction Bond Approval 167 FF- 35. Special Assessment Election Requirements 167 FF-36. Homestead Market Value Exclusion 168 FF-37. State Fund for Non-weather-related Disaster/Catastrophe Relief 168 7 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS STAFF © MinnesotaCities Aft The League's Intergovernmental Relations (IGR) staff work on legislative MinnesotaCities#LMCIeg issues that matter to cities. Feel free to contact our IGR staff members with any questions, concerns, or suggestions regarding legislative issues. www.lmc.org We're here to help! Gary Carlson Anne Finn IGR staff and the legislative Director Assistant Director issues they cover are listed (651) 281-1255 (612) 269-9975 here. gcarlson@lmc.org afinn@lmc.org @garyncarlson @annemfinn Not sure who to contact? Assistant Director Anne Finn • Aid to cities • Emergency management (information right) is happy • Economic development • Employment&human resources to help direct you to the • Pensions&retirement • Public safety right staffer for complex or • Public finances • State bonding miscellaneous issues. • Taxes • Transportation • Tax increment financing (TIF) • Workers' compensation Alex Hassel Craig Johnson Irene Kao Representative Representative Counsel (651) 281-1261 (651) 281-1259 (651) 281-1260 ahassel@lmc.org cjohnson@lmc.org ikao@lmc.org @AlexHassel @cajohnson_1 @irenewkao • Elections • Energy • Building code • Employment&Human Resources • Environment • Civil liability • Regulated Industries • Land use&annexation • Data practices&Open Meeting Law • Local/tribal relations • Employment law • State bonding • Land use&zoning • Sustainable development • Wastewater,drinking water, &stormwater SEPT2022 Daniel Ted Bengtson Lightfoot G Administrative Representative Coordinator O (651) 281-1295 (651) 281-1242 tbengtson@lmc.org oLMC dlightfoot@lmc.org @tbengtsonlmc @dflightfoot • Broadband • General LEAGUE of • Cable/franchising • Member relations MINNESOTA • Federal relations&advocacy • Housing y CITIES • Telecommunications, information technology,&wireless infrastructure E W W W.L M C.O R G COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP 2022-2023 Improving Service Delivery Jorge Prince, Mayor, Bemidji Chair: Tina Folch, Contracts Administrator, Chad Roberts, Councilmember, Victoria Red Wing Calvin Saari, Mayor,Nashwauk Vice Chair: Carly Johnson, Councilmember, Cara Schulz, Council, Burnsville Oak Park Heights Alex Smith, Assistant City Administrator, Cambridge Josh Berg, Councilmember, Elko New Cathy Sorensen, City Clerk, Blaine Market Ken Spielman, Mayor, Pemberton Kelli Bourgeois, City Manager, Columbia Michael Sund, Election Specialist, St. Louis Heights Park Daniel Buchholtz, Administrator, Mike Supina, Council Member, Eagan Clerk/Treasurer, Spring Lake Park Alyssa Swanson, Assistant to the City Deb Calvert, Council Member, Minnetonka Manager, Victoria Heather Corcoran, Legislative Policy John Swenson, Public Safety Director, Lino Analyst, Rochester Lakes Hope Fairchild, City Administrator/Clerk- Christian Taylor, Interim Director of Treasurer, Walker Intergovernmental Relations, Saint Paul Tom Fletcher, Councilmember, Greenwood Nhia Vang, Dep Hearing Officer/Sr Policy Tina Folch, Contracts Administrator, Red Analyst, St. Paul Wing Duane Willenbring, Mayor, Rockville Mary Gaasch*, Mayor, Lauderdale Colleen Winter, City Administrator, Melrose Jodi Gallup, City Clerk/Administrative Andrew Wittenborg, Communications and Coordinator, Plymouth Marketing Manager, Minnetonka Elroy Glidden, Councilman, Welcome Wally Wysopal, City Manager, Fridley Valerie Halter, Clerk/Treasurer, Lamberton Nyle Zikmund, City Administrator, Mounds Erica Henderson, Deputy City Clerk, View Burnsville Blaine Hill, City Manager, Morris *LMC Board of Director Steven Huser, Government Relations Representative, Minneapolis 2022-2023 Improving Local Economies Carly Johnson, City Councilmember, Oak Chair: Tony Chladek, City Administrator, Park Heights Rushford BJ Jungmann, Fire Chief, Burnsville Vice Chair: Maria Solano, Deputy City Larry Kraft, Councilmember, Saint Louis Manager, Plymouth Park Becky Lammi, City Administrator/Clerk- Dylan Armstead, Community Development Treasurer, Hoyt Lakes Director, Zumbrota Heidi Lee, Race &Equity Manager, Edina Kati Bachmayer, Economic Development Athanasia Lewis, Assistant City Coordinator, Lakeville Administrator, Centerville Josh Berg, Councilmember, Elko New Steve Lindaas, Councilmember, Moorhead Market Loren Olson, Government Relations Tammy Block, Council Member, Representative, Minneapolis Rosemount Hunter Panning, Police Officer, Chaska Steve Bot, City Administrator, St. Michael 9 Mark Box, City Administrator, Deer River Candy Petersen, Councilmember,North St. Brooke Carlson, Council President, Paul Rochester Chelsea Petersen, Assistant City Tony Chladek, City Administrator, Rushford Administrator, Shakopee Craig Clark*, City Administrator, Austin Margaret Rog, Councilmember, St. Louis Kissy Coakley, Council Member, Park Minnetonka Calvin Saari, Mayor,Nashwauk Heather Corcoran, Legislative Policy Maria Solano, Deputy City Manager, Analyst, Rochester Plymouth Lisa Eng-Sarne, City Council Member, Christian Taylor, Interim Director of West St. Paul Intergovernmental Relations, Saint Paul Tom Fletcher, Councilmember, Greenwood Evan Vogel, City Administrator, Cambridge Renae Fry, City Administrator,North Deb Wegeleben, Finance Director, Big Lake Branch Kimberly Wilburn, Council Member, Mike Funk, City Manager, Minnetonka Minnetonka Elroy Glidden, Councilman, Welcome Emily Goellner, Community Development *LMC Board of Director Director, Wayzata Tina Goodroad, Community Development 2022-2023 Human Resources &Data Director, City of Lakeville Practices Tom Goodwin, Councilmember, City of Chair: Dawn Pearson, HR Manager, Apple Valley Minnetonka Derek Gunderson, Councilmember, Victoria Vice Chair: Evan Vogel, City Administrator, Dan Gustafson, Council member, Burnsville Cambridge Gary Hansen, City Councilmember, Eagan Dana Hardie, City Manager, Victoria Ashlee Asp, Labor Relations Manager, Maurice Harris, Councilmember, Golden Rochester Valley Becky Barham, HR Manager, Bloomington Steven Huser, Government Relations Wendy Berry*, City Councilmember, West Representative, Minneapolis Saint Paul Cheryl Jacobson, City Administrator, Wayne Boucher, Mayor, Hermantown Mendota Heights Kelli Bourgeois, City Manager, Columbia Marvin Johnson, Mayor, Independence Heights Scott Johnson, City Administrator, Medina Dick Brainerd, City Council Member, Kelcey Klemm, City Administrator, Detroit Mahtomedi Lakes Deb Calvert, Administrative Manager, St. Deborah Maloney, Asst. Finance Director, Paul Shoreview Heather Corcoran, Legislative Policy Jenny Max*, City Administrator,Nisswa Analyst, Rochester Mary McComber, Mayor, Oak Park Heights Charnelle Dengnoue, HR/Risk Cathy Mehelich, Economic Development Management Coordinator, Robbinsdale Director, St. Cloud Julie Flaten, Assistant City Kirby Moynagh, Mayor, Montrose Administrator/Human Resources Director, Loren Olson, Government Relations Farmington Representative, Minneapolis Jimmy Francis, Mayor, South St. Paul 10 Michael Freske, Employment Attorney, City Vice Chair: Sarah Rathlisberger, Finance of Brooklyn Park Director, City of Monticello Theodore Frid, Human Resource Manager, Victoria Heather Corcoran, Legislative Policy Melissa Haas, Human Resources Manager, Analyst, Rochester Apple Valley Elroy Glidden, Councilman, Welcome Corrine Heine, City Attorney, Minnetonka LaTonia Green, Finance Director, Brooklyn Juliana Hultstrom, City Councilor, Osseo Park Steven Huser, Government Relations Marshall Hallock, Administrative Business Representative, Minneapolis Director, Red Wing Jennifer Labadie, Mayor, Shorewood Alvin Hebert, Councilmember, Victoria Becky Lammi, City Administrator/Clerk- Blaine Hill, City Manager, Morris Treasurer, Hoyt Lakes Steven Huser, Government Relations Joan Lenzmeier, City Clerk, Coon Rapids Representative, Minneapolis Deborah Maloney, Asst. Finance Director, Tom Lawell, City Administrator, Apple Shoreview Valley Shari Moore, City Clerk, St. Paul Athanasia Lewis, Assistant City Loren Olson, Government Relations Administrator, Centerville Representative, Minneapolis Dan Matejka, City Administrator, Goodview Dawn Pearson, Human Resources Manager, Justin Miller*, City Administrator, Lakeville Minnetonka Caroline Moe, Director of Finance, Jennifer Pinski, Assistant City Cambridge Administrator, Oak Park Heights Steve Nasby, City Administrator, Windom Michael Rietz, Assistant City Manager, Darin Nelson, Finance Director, Minnetonka Moorhead Steven Okins, Finance Director, Willmar Megan Schlei, HR Technician, Hastings Loren Olson, Government Relations Tammy Schutta, Human Resources Representative, Minneapolis Manager, Lakeville Trisha Pollock, Finance/HR Director, Janet Shefchik, Human Resources Manager, Victoria Inver Grove Heights Sarah Rathlisberger, Finance Director, Christian Taylor, Interim Director of Monticello Intergovernmental Relations, Saint Paul Christina Regas, City Administrator, Jewel Thurman, Human Resources Blackduck Manager, Red Wing Gillian Rosenquist, City Council Member, Evan Vogel, City Administrator, Cambridge Golden Valley Deb Wegeleben, Finance Director, Big Lake Ken Spielman, Mayor, Pemberton Michelle Wolfe, Clty Manager, Blaine Melissa Stenson, City Clerk/Treasurer, Nyle Zikmund, City Administrator, Mounds South Haven View Christian Taylor, Interim Director of Intergovernmental Relations, Saint Paul *LMC Board of Director Chris Volkers*, City Administrator, Oakdale Deb Wegeleben, Finance Director, Big Lake 2022-2023 Improving Fiscal Futures Jim Weikum, Mayor, Biwabik Chair: Dan Matejka, City Administrator, John Werner, Mayor, Rice Lake Goodview Brad Wiersum, Mayor, Minnetonka Josi Wood, City Administrator, Isanti 11 Vince Workman, Council member, Burnsville Nancy Zaworski, Finance Director, Kasson *LMC Board of Director 12 LMC POLICY DEVELOPMENT PROCESS The City Policies document addresses more than 180 legislative issues that impact cities and serves as the foundation of the League of Minnesota Cities (LMC) advocacy efforts. City officials from across the state are recruited throughout the year to serve on one or more policy committees. In 2022, over 150 city officials participated in the policy committees. Policies are considered, discussed, and revised annually with considerable member input. Then, draft policies are published online for member comments before being considered for approval by the LMC Board of Directors. Guided by the City Policies, LMC member cities and staff actively advocate for city-friendly legislation. Below are some of the major events in the policy development process: January The Minnesota Legislature begins the first session of each two-year biennium in January of odd-numbered years. The 2023 Legislative session will begin on January 3. February The Legislature typically begins the second session of each biennium in February or March of even-numbered years. The 2022 Legislative Session began on January 31. March/April In March, the National League of Cities hosts the Congressional City Conference in Washington, D.C. The League's legislative conference is held in St. Paul (cancelled in 2022 due to pandemic complications). May Under the Minnesota Constitution, the deadline to end any legislative session is the first Monday following the third Saturday in May(May 23, 2022). The governor may call special legislative sessions when necessary. June At the LMC Annual Conference (held in Duluth this year from June 22 to June 24), members provide comments on City Policies throughout the conference and during the Legislative Update. July Policy committees hold their first of three meetings. The July meeting typically includes a review of the most recent legislative session, a preliminary discussion of emerging issues, and a review of member comments and board interim policies from the prior year. August Policy committees hold their second of three meetings to hear from subject-matter experts on existing and potential new policy topics. September Policy committees meet for a third time to finalize their work and make specific policy recommendations to the LMC Board of Directors. October Draft policies, as approved by the policy committees, are shared with members online during the comment period. Member input is also sought from city officials attending LMC City Meetups around the state each fall. November The LMC Board of Directors reviews member input, then considers and amends the policies for the following calendar year. The Board adopts policies on behalf of League members before the start of the next legislative session. 13 PURPOSE, PROCESS AND PRINCIPLES OF CITY POLICIES The League of Minnesota Cities is dedicated to promoting excellence in local government through effective advocacy, expert analysis, and trusted guidance for all Minnesota cities. Each year, the League's member cities identify common needs and goals, and the Board of Directors adopts policies designed to help cities overcome obstacles and reach those goals. These policies serve as the foundation of the League's advocacy work on behalf of Minnesota cities. There are 854 cities in Minnesota, and 837 cities are members of the League of Minnesota Cities. Eleven townships and 63 special districts/other members are also League members. The League's members include the smallest rural cities in Greater Minnesota and the largest cities in the urban core; they include suburban communities in the Metropolitan Area and regional centers in every corner of the state. Every member of the League has a voice in developing the following policies. Two core principles guide the development of City Policies and the actions of the League: 1. Local units of government must have sufficient authority and flexibility to meet the challenges of governing and providing citizens with public services. The Legislature must avoid imposing unfunded and underfunded mandates that erode local control and create liability and financial risk for city taxpayers. 2. The increasingly complex and costly requirements necessary for cities to provide services to their citizens require a strong partnership between federal, state, and local governments. This partnership should be based upon a shared vision for Minnesota and should allow individual communities to tailor that vision to the unique needs of their citizens. Because of the fluid nature of emerging issues, state and national politics, and current events, additional and alternative policies may be proposed after the policies are adopted by the Board of Directors. The League will make every effort to notify members of substantial changes or additions to policies after they are adopted by the Board of Directors. 14 IMPROVING SERVICE DELIVERY SD-1. Local Control president, the Minnesota Legislature, and the governor for local budget priorities. Issue: Cities are often laboratories for These mandates force cities to reduce determining public policy approaches to the funding for other basic services or to challenges that face citizens. Success in increase taxes and service charges. providing for the basic needs of a functional Response: society is rooted in local control to determine how best to respond to the ever- a) Existing unfunded mandates should changing needs of a citizenry. Because city be reviewed and modified or repealed government most directly impacts the lives where possible. of people, and representative democracy ensures that locally elected officials are held b) No additional statewide mandates accountable for their decisions through local should be enacted unless full funding elections, local governments must have for the mandate is provided by the sufficient authority and flexibility to meet level of government imposing it or a the challenges of governing and providing permanent stable revenue source is citizens with public services. established. Response: The increasingly complex and c) Cities should not be forced to comply costly requirements necessary for cities to with unfunded mandates. provide services to their citizens would benefit from a strong partnership d) Cities should be given the greatest between federal, state and local flexibility possible in implementing governments. This partnership should be mandates to ensure their cost is based upon a shared vision for Minnesota minimized. and should allow individual communities to tailor that vision to the unique needs of their citizens without mandates and policy restrictions imposed by state and SD-3. Local Approval of Special federal policy makers. The state should Laws recognize that local governments, of all sizes, are often the first to identify Issue: The Minnesota Constitution prohibits problems and inventive solutions to solve special legislation except for certain special them, and should encourage further laws relating to local government. It innovation by increasing local control. provides that a special law must name the The state should not enact initiatives that affected local unit of government and is erode the fundamental principle of local effective only after approval by the local control in cities across Minnesota. government unit,unless general state law provides otherwise. Under(Minn. Stat. §§ SD-2. Unfunded Mandates 645.021-645.024), a special law is not effective unless approved by the affected Issue: Federal and state mandated programs local unit of government, except under substitute the judgment of Congress, the limited circumstances. 15 In recent years, the Legislature has d) be equitably structured. occasionally enacted general laws that affect a single local unit of government. By enacting a general law with limited application, local approval is not required. Cities have and will continue to re-evaluate city programs and services, pursue the use of Response: The League of Minnesota cooperative agreements, and consider Cities supports the Constitutional organizational changes that provide greater requirement that a special law must be government efficiency and result in better approved by the affected local unit of service to citizens. Citizen input and government before it can take effect. If a participation should be gathered and taken law is intended to affect or benefit a single into account as decisions about service local unit of government, the Legislature delivery are being made and implemented. must follow the requirements for enacting a special law set forth in the Minnesota All levels of government are encouraged to: Constitution and in Minn. Stat. §§ 645.021-645.024. The League specifically a) Ensure that in redesigning, reinventing opposes the Legislature's technique of or reassigning government services and bypassing the Constitution by not naming programs, the appropriate level of the local government,but describing the service to citizens is evaluated and local government in such narrow terms citizen demands and expectations are that it can only apply to one entity. adequately addressed. SD-4. Redesigning and Reinventing b) Engage as many citizens as possible, from diverse backgrounds and interests, Government to determine what services matter most to citizens and how the delivery of those Issue: Every level of government is services can be changed to increase redesigning, reinventing, and reevaluating efficiency and lower cost. its organizational structure and programs in response to financial realities and citizens' c) Educate citizens about what services needs and problems. Reforms, however, government delivers, how they are must be more than change for the sake of delivered, and how those services are change to existing programs. It is funded. imperative that government officials talk with citizens about how services are d) Engage in traditional and nontraditional currently provided and how they can be best partnerships to make service changes provided in the future. and do things in new ways. To be meaningful, redesign of governmental e) Identify and repeal programs or entities and services should: discontinue services that are no longer necessary, and evaluate which services a) save money where feasible; can readily and fairly be provided by the b) deliver improved services; private sector. c) serve essential needs; and Response: Federal, state, and county governments should: 16 a) Promote and support local redesign d) The shutdown of transportation projects efforts through incentives rather than on the trunk highway and state aid mandates. system. b) Communicate and establish a process e) Interruption of local economic of negotiation before shifting development due to the state having sole responsibility for delivering services authority to inspect, review and approve from one level of government to various plans and types of projects. another, or seeking to reduce service duplication. Although the 2011 shutdown ultimately resulted in judicially-ordered continuation of c) Utilize government entities with many state government services, a 2017 proven track records in redesign Minnesota Supreme Court decision(A17- efforts. 1142) would likely exacerbate the impacts on cities in a future state government SD-5. State Government Shutdowns shutdown. In that decision, the court stressed that "Article XI, Section 1 of the Minnesota Issue: Twice in less than one decade, the Constitution does not permit judicially state Legislature and governor failed to ordered funding for the Legislative Branch reach a global agreement on the state budget in the absence of an appropriation." The by the end of the fiscal biennium (June 30 of effect of the 2017 decision has yet to be odd-numbered years). As a result of these tested. impasses, portions of state government were shut down. The shutdowns,particularly the Response: The League of Minnesota shutdown in 2011, created a range of Cities urges the Legislature and governor challenges for cities, as well as for the to establish a procedure in state law to state's courts, residents, businesses, licensed continue certain state government professionals, state employees and others. operations into a new biennium in the event that the governor and legislators For cities, the most pronounced challenges cannot reach a budget agreement. related to the shutdowns were as follows: Specifically, the Legislature and governor should modify state law to assure that the a) Uncertainty about the timing and amount staff necessary to distribute state funds of aid and credit reimbursement that are already encumbered or payments and the distribution of local statutorily appropriated to local sales tax revenues. governments are distributed as statutorily scheduled, or in the absence of a statutory b) Inability of licensed city professionals payment schedule, are released in a such as peace officers and water predictable and timely manner in the treatment facility operators to renew event of future shutdowns. licenses. The Legislature should also pass c) Loss of access to critical information legislation that allows existing licenses of such as the Bureau of Criminal public employees to be continued during Apprehension database and state- any future state government shutdown mandated reports. and should identify additional areas, such as electrical and plumbing inspection and 17 plumbing plan review, where local Minn. Stat. ch. 84C regarding conservation governments could reasonably step in to easements was enacted in 1985, and Minn. handle the inspections, review, and Stat. §§ 84.64-.65 regarding conservation approval necessary for local projects to restrictions were originally enacted in 1974. move forward, and allows work on Because conservation easements and approved projects to continue in state conservation restrictions are not listed rights-of-way. among the restrictions that are not subject to Minn. Stat. § 500.20, subd. 2a, it is possible SD-6. Duration of Conservation to conclude, by negative implication, that Easements subd. 2a does apply to the conservation easements and conservation restrictions Issue: The Minnesota Marketable Title Act created by earlier enacted statues. This provides that any deed over 40 years old can conclusion is inconsistent with the language be disregarded unless the holder of the in Minn. Stat. § 84C.02(b)that"a interest re-records it. There is an exception conservation easement is unlimited in for a person in possession of the property. A duration unless the instrument creating it 2010 Minnesota Supreme Court decision otherwise provides." said that the person in possession has to show that the possession has been visible Response: The League of Minnesota enough to put a prudent person on notice of Cities supports legislation that excepts the interest, and that the possession has to be holders of conservation easements from continuous. Sampair v. Village of re-recording the easements under the Birchwood, 784 N.W.2d 65 (Minn. 2010). Minnesota Marketable Title Act and that clarifies that Minn. Stat. § 500.20, subd. This creates issues for cities that have 2a, does not apply to conservation conservation easements. It is difficult, if not easements and restrictions. impossible, to show actual use of the easement because conservation easements SD-7. Racial Equity in Minnesota are passive easements, not active ones. As a result, cities will have to re-record the Issue: Since the earliest days of its history, easements every 40 years in order to race and racial inequity issues have been maintain them. This will result in a present in Minnesota. Land acquisition and significant administrative burden and ownership, discriminatory covenants increase costs for local units of government restricting homeownership to white due to staff time, legal fees, and recording Minnesotans, and patterns of systemic, fees. structural, and institutional racism have brought the state to experience some of the Additionally, Minn. Stat. § 500.20, entitled worst racial disparities in the country for "Defeasible Estates,"provides in subd. 2a employment, housing, education, health, that private covenants, conditions, or criminal justice, and law enforcement. restrictions that affect the title or use of real Explicit and implicit bias toward people of estate cease to be valid 30 years after the color is prevalent in public policies and date of the instrument creating them and other rules governing Minnesota residents. they may be disregarded. This provision Racial equity is accomplished when race can was initially enacted in 1988. no longer be used to predict success, and we have government and systems that work for all. 18 The data is readily available from the U.S. e) Working to improve access to city Census, the state demographer, and local procurement opportunities for veteran-, government. For example, Minnesota ranks woman-, and minority-owned 50th in the nation for median income businesses. equality and 49th in homeownership equality. The killing of George Floyd and However, cities acknowledge that there is the disproportionate impact of COVID-19 much work that still needs to be done before on communities of color have further success for all Minnesotans can be achieved highlighted the critical need to overhaul our regardless of race. To optimize success for laws, policies, and practices to address all Minnesotans, cities cannot work in systemic racism. isolation on racial equity issues. Racial demographics are continually Further, it should be acknowledged that changing throughout the state. According to community members who are both from the state demographer, 20 percent of communities of color and are immigrants Minnesota's population are people of color. require local governments to understand the All racial groups have recently increased in intersection between these two issues and the state,but between 2010 and 2018, evaluate public policy initiatives from Minnesota has added five times as many multiple social justice perspectives. League people of color as white residents. policies on immigration and racial equity are heavily interrelated in that situation. While every city may be in a different place, the need for racial equity and the need to Response: In order to best support and repair past racial harms touches all serve all Minnesotans,the State should communities, from the most racially diverse take a leadership role by prioritizing cities to cities with very few or no people of addressing racial equity through its color. In recognition of the need to strive for actions: racial equity, cities are invested in building a more equitable future when every resident a) Partner with local government and can thrive regardless of race. Among efforts communities of color to identify and cities are undertaking are: address racial equity issues; a) Examining how cities deliver services b) Proactively assess past racial harms and set local policies among city staff and develop actions to address them; and elected officials; c) Collect and provide data b) Creating high-level staff positions and disaggregated by race necessary for departments to address race equity, cities and the state to make informed financial and educational opportunity, decisions about how to address racial diversity, and analysis of city policies; disparities; c) Engaging with the communities of color d) Develop a state system for the to build/rebuild relationships and trust; proactive and innovative development and delivery of resources to local d) Establishing city commissions to address government to address racial equity race and racial equity issues with local including policy and service options, affected communities; and 19 local engagement tools, policy Federal and state governments must not expertise, and financial resources; and transfer responsibility for enforcing U.S. immigration laws to local personnel, e) Actively review and amend existing including police officers, firefighters, statutory language to identify laws educators, health professionals, and social that contribute to racial inequities and service employees. Federal and state consider racial equity impacts when governments must not prohibit local units crafting proposed legislation and of government from implementing policies. policies aimed at fostering positive relationships between local government SD-8. Immigration Reform officials, including law enforcement personnel, and immigrant communities. Issue: The United States and the State of Finally, the League supports funding for Minnesota have long traditions of a Minnesota Office of New Americans welcoming immigrants. Immigrants within the Minnesota Department of strengthen Minnesota by contributing to the Employment and Economic Development state's economy, enhancing cultural (DEED)which, among other resources, and participating in efforts to responsibilities,would develop and build strong communities. deliver career readiness services to Minnesota's immigrant workers. According to the National League of Cities, roughly 35 percent of undocumented SD-9. Responsibility for Locating immigrants have lived in the United States Private Underground Facilities for 10 years or more. Approximately 1.6 million undocumented immigrants are Issue: Cities are responsible for complying children, and another 3.1 million children in with state pipeline safety regulations that the United States have at least one hold cities responsible for locating and undocumented parent. These families are marking private service laterals that connect forced to live "underground" and are unable in public rights-of-way to city sanitary and to get drivers' licenses or car insurance in storm sewer, water, and district heating most states. In addition, they are unlikely to systems. The Minnesota Office of Pipeline obtain health insurance and are afraid to Safety(MNOPS) is proposing amendments report crimes to local law enforcement. to state pipeline and safety rules related to Since immigrants are barred from most the definition of excavation and changes to federal public assistance, the burden of mandatory damage reporting. providing social services, education, and Cities are concerned that damage to private health care falls to state and local service laterals within the public right-of- governments that are increasingly feeling way continues due, in part, to construction the financial impact of both legal and illegal methods during the replacement, repair immigrants living in their communities. and/or installation of underground utilities Response: The League of Minnesota which cross city water and sewer services Cities,together with the National League that are in the public rights-of-way. of Cities, urges Congress to move quickly Trenchless excavation could potentially to enact and enforce effective cause damage to underground service immigration laws. laterals and negatively impact the quality of utility services. 20 Response: The League supports the depth that the city allows for the changes to the definition of excavation installation. presented by MNOPS at the 2012 Review of Minn. Stat. ch. 216D. Cities support Cities must not be required to locate the elimination of windbreaks, privately-owned water and sewer laterals shelterbelts, and tree plantations from the and must not be held responsible for definition of excavation, unless any of actions by excavators when the city these activities disturbs the soil to a depth determines not to locate such facilities. of 18 inches or more. Excavators should be responsible for locating and protecting any private The League supports exempting normal service lateral that is impacted by maintenance of roads and streets from the excavation activities conducted on private definition of excavation if the property beyond the public right-of-way. maintenance does not change the original grade and does not involve the road ditch SD-10. Utility Relocation Under by defining "original grade" as the grade Design-Build Road Construction at the date of issue of the first notice by the excavator. Issue: The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) has promoted The League supports increasing MNOPS legislation relating to the design-build fines for violators of state pipeline safety construction process that would require requirements, bringing state penalties in private and public utilities to be responsible line with federal penalties. for utility relocation necessitated by road construction. The policy, if enacted, would The League opposes mandatory damage create unanticipated costs for utilities owned reporting and recommends a simple and operated by cities. Municipally-owned standardized form to encourage cities to utilities would be unreasonably held to the voluntarily report damages. The League same standards as privately-owned utilities opposes requirements that would force that exist in the public right-of-way. cities to mark underground facilities of all sizes and materials. Response: The League of Minnesota Cities supports use of the design-build The League recognizes that trenchless procedure, however, municipal utilities excavation presents concerns to cities. that exist in the public right-of-way Private property owners in the excavation should not be penalized under this area must receive advance notice of any process. Municipal utilities legitimately trenchless or other excavation activities exist in the public right-of-way. When a that could affect the quality of utility MnDOT construction project requires the services. Notice must include at least one relocation of utilities, the cost of phone number for assistance in case of relocating municipal utilities should be any service problems. shared equitably between MnDOT and Contractors must comply with city affected municipal utilities. permits requiring that the drill head be visible when crossing any paint marks and moving through the pothole at the 21 SD-11. National Fire Protection also opposes any attempt to adopt a Association (NFPA) Standards standard dictating or affecting the response time of any fire, specialized or Issue: The National Fire Protection EMS vehicle. Association (NFPA) is an international association of individuals and trade and SD-12. Fire Mutual Aid professional organizations that deals with fire and life safety. The NFPA has Issue: City and township fire departments advocated legislation that would mandate regularly assist each other with firefighting two standards: NFPA 1710, Organization and other response activities. This mutual and Deployment of Fire Suppression aid is mostly authorized by individual Operations, Emergency Medical Operations, written contracts with each city or township, and Special Operations to the Public by which results in a patchwork of different Career Fire Departments, and NFPA 1720, agreements with different provisions. Often, Organization and Deployment of Fire each city attorney recommends different Suppression, Emergency Medical provisions. Operations, and Special Operations to the Public by Volunteer Fire Departments. Following the Red River floods and the St. NFPA standards 1710 and 1720 define Peter tornados, emergency responders minimum response times, minimum fire (including fire departments)met and helped company staffing levels, initial full alarm pass a statute to govern mutual aid situations response levels, and extra alarm response when there is an emergency declared by levels. Although NFPA codes and standards mayor or governor and no written are voluntary, they are often adopted by agreements exist. The statute, Minn. Stat. § local jurisdictions. 12.331, provides a framework for how worker's compensation, liability,property Response: Levels of service delivery for claims, insurance, and charges between the fire and emergency medical services departments will be handled in mutual aid (EMS) have always been determined by situations. local jurisdictions. If mandated,the NFPA standards would force local The League of Minnesota Cities Insurance governments to shift dollars from fire Trust(LMCIT) developed a model mutual prevention programs to fire suppression aid agreement that contains the same basic structure for liability as the statute. Many activities, potentially increasing the risk cities have entered into area-wide mutual aid of fire and the danger to local firefighters. agreements that are similar to the LMCIT The League supports permanent and model agreement. To provide uniformity, ongoing state funding to assist fire there should be a statute that is similar to § Minn. Stat. 12.331, to govern daily fire departments statewide to improve emergency response and work toward mutual aid situations that do not rise to the industry standards. level of emergencies. The League of Minnesota Cities opposes Response: The Legislature should pass a any attempt to mandate standards for statute to provide uniform provisions minimum staffing levels of fire, when fire departments assist each other. specialized or EMS vehicles controlled by These provisions should include statutory units of local government. The League definitions and clarifications for: 22 a) Who is in command of the mutual aid Response: Include in Minn. Stat. § 471.59 scene. (the joint powers statute) language substantially similar to Minn. Stat. § b) Who will cover the firefighters for 626.93 that clarifies that Indian tribes worker's compensation. entering into joint powers relationships agree to: c) How liability and property claims will be handled. a) Be subject to liability for its torts and those of its officers, employees, and d) Who will pay for expendable supplies agents acting within the scope of their such as foam. employment or duties arising out of the joint powers agreement to the e) When fire departments will charge same extent as a municipality under each other for these services. Minn. Stat. ch. 466; and f) The ability for fire departments to opt b) Notwithstanding Minn. Stat. § 16C.05, out by having a separate written subd. 7,waive its sovereign immunity agreement. with respect to claims arising from liability under the joint powers. SD-13. Clarification of Joint Powers Relationships with Federally SD-14. Ambulance Service Costs Recognized Indian Tribes and Liability Issue: During the 2010 legislative session, Issue: The cost of providing ambulance care Minn. Stat. § 471.59 was modified to allow has increased steadily over the last several federally recognized Indian tribes to years due in part to changes in Medicare and participate in joint powers agreements with Medicaid reimbursement. The federal other governmental entities, including Balanced Budget Act(BBA) of 1997 made Minnesota cities. Indian tribes are two significant changes to ambulance extremely unique legal entities under federal billing. First, the act mandated that all law and international treaties. The new law ambulance services accept Medicare and was a broad brush authorization that did not Medicaid assignments as payment in full; address important issues that uniquely arise that is, ambulance services cannot bill the when dealing with Indian tribes related to Medicare or Medicaid patient for any unpaid sovereignty, insurance liability and liability balance beyond the Medicare or Medicaid limits (commonly called"tort caps"). assignment. Second, the act mandated a Previous laws, such as Minn. Stat. § 626.93 uniform fee schedule that was implemented (authorizing tribes to act as law enforcement in April 2002. The new fee schedule entities) explicitly addressed these concerns. significantly reduced reimbursement levels Since the new law passed, interest has been for many ambulance services. In addition, in expressed by public safety groups and most cases Medicare does not pay for costs individual cities in entering into joint powers related to treatment of patients that are not agreements with federally recognized Indian transported. The BBA mandates are tribes. However, legislative guidance is impacting the ability of some Minnesota needed to address concerns related to ambulance service providers to adequately sovereignty, insurance and liability limits for fund their operations. these agreements. 23 The loss of revenue due to Medicare and provide defined additional funding to Medicaid reimbursement changes, coupled offset the gap with higher insurance rates, is affecting the ability of many ambulance service The League also urges the Legislature to providers to deliver emergency care, extend the protection of the state and particularly in rural Minnesota. All municipal Tort Claims Act to licensed ambulance services and personnel are third parties that contract with a regulated by Minn. Stat. ch. 144E and must municipality to provide ambulance comply with the same licensing, training, services. The League also supports and equipment-related requirements, extending the applicability of public regardless of ownership. official immunity to medical directors in the course of ambulance service activities. In addition, the liability exposure of medical directors associated with ambulance service SD-15. Emergency Medical Services is a concern. While medical directors of government-based ambulance services may Issue: The Emergency Medical Services arguably be covered by public official Regulatory Board(EMSRB) is the State of immunity, the law is unclear and should be Minnesota's regulatory entity that oversees clarified. and issues ambulance licenses. The EMSRB has the authority to designate exclusive Response: The League of Minnesota emergency medical services (EMS) Cities supports federal legislation that operating areas, or primary service areas would: (PSAs), for ambulance providers. Once a provider has been approved to operate in a a) Require Medicare to set ambulance PSA, the provider is authorized to serve that payment rates to cover the cost of PSA for an indefinite period of time. providing service for both transport Currently, no other health licensing board in and non-transport care of patients; Minnesota grants a provider an exclusive operating area. b) Require adequate reimbursement for ambulance providers; Historically, health licensing boards have played a critical role in setting professional c) Require Medicare to reimburse for standards and establishing credentialing 911 ambulance transports regardless processes. However, the EMSRB has not of medical necessity; imposed operational standards to ensure an d) Make it easier for providers to file area has adequate coverage and service level claims with Medicare by eliminating a such as response time requirements on EMS providers. Furthermore, there is currently no processing system that often leads to oversight of ambulance billing rates. The the rejection of legitimate current system does not require ambulance reimbursement claims. services to disclose the number of If the federal government does not ambulances staffed, where an ambulance is increase Medicare and Medicaid rates in responding from or any other important data the immediate future to fully reimburse points that would ensure a community is providers for the cost of treating and receiving quality ambulance services. The transporting patients, the state should lack of transparency within Minnesota's 24 ambulance industry compromises providing certain services, permits, and accountability by EMS providers. licenses. Response: The League of Minnesota The Legislature and interest groups often Cities supports: seek to mandate or preserve fee limitations for city services. Over the last several years, a) Allowing local units of government to the Legislature has enacted a number of new designate which licensed ambulance laws designed to rigorously control local service provider or providers may fee-setting authority. Examples of such serve their communities and to mandates include placing limits on coin- determine the appropriate level of operated amusement machine license fees, service; on-sale and off-sale liquor license fees, license fees for retailers selling fireworks, b) Providing local units of government deputy registrar fees and planning and with tools and authority to ensure zoning fees. The state also requires cities transparency by EMS providers; that collect more than$5,000 in development-related fees each year to c) Uncoupling the professional standards annually report all construction and overview role of the EMSRB from the development fees to the Department of service area determination; Labor and Industry. d) Requiring the membership of the Response:While the state has a role in EMSRB to be regionally balanced providing a general, statewide funding between Greater Minnesota and the policy,the state should not interfere in the metropolitan area; decision-making functions performed by e) Modifying the membership of the cities when setting city budgets to provide EMSRB to include representatives of city services. The League of Minnesota municipal ambulance services; Cities seeks authority for cities to charge fees that are reasonably related to the cost 0 Legislative consideration of setting of providing the service, permit or license. term limits for EMSRB members; The League opposes legislation that would require specific methods to pay for g) Continued authority for the EMSRB city services or would place caps on city to set professional standards; and fees. h) Requiring the EMSRB to submit SD-17. Fundraising Authority biennial reports on EMS service delivery data points for each local unit Issue: Recent years have seen an increase in of government to appropriate cities looking to find ways to accept legislative committees. donations for specific projects that community members, non-profit SD-16. Fees for Service organizations, or businesses have interest in. Though there is authority for cities to accept Issue:While general services—such as gifts under Minn. Stat. § 465.04, an opinion permitting, inspections or enforcement—are from the Office of the State Auditor has typically funded out of a city's general fund, stated that cities lack the authority to cities often impose fees to cover the cost of fundraise. 25 There are specific situations in which city There are several requirements (Minn. Stat. personnel can solicit contributions. Under § 331A.02) for a newspaper to be a Minn. Stat. § 465.90, firefighters are "qualified" or"official"newspaper for the authorized to solicit charitable contributions city. For instance, there can only be one from motorists for a charitable organization. newspaper chosen for the city; it must be Under Minn. Stat. § 471.198, a city may printed in English in a newspaper format; if authorize officials and staff to solicit it is a daily newspaper, it must be distributed contributions for the purposes of funding at least five days each week; if not a daily National Night Out or any event or purpose paper, it may be distributed twice a month that the governing body determines will with respect to the publishing of government foster positive relationships between law public notices; it must be circulated in the enforcement and the community. city which it purports to serve, and either have at least 400 copies regularly delivered Many cities desire the ability to fundraise to paying subscribers or have at least 400 for equipment for firefighter and EMS copies distributed without charge to local services, libraries, or special projects such as residents. For cities under 1,300 population, parks and trails. Authorizing cities to more the delivery and distribution threshold is 250 broadly solicit and accept charitable copies. donations for projects in which there is broad community support would allow the As the newspaper industry has been funding for desired projects without challenged by alternative technologies, a requiring an increase in property taxes or growing number of cities are unable to find seeking a local option sales tax. a newspaper that meets the qualifications in state statute. In addition, as technology has Response: The League of Minnesota evolved, citizens have become more Cities supports amending Minn. Stat. § accustomed to the instantaneous availability 471 to authorize cities to solicit charitable of online information. Because cities are donations for the purpose of projects that committed to providing information to have generated community interest such citizens and responding to this demand, they as parks, trails, and community centers or have invested heavily in their websites and resources needed for city services. in growing a robust online presence. They survey citizens about what method of SD-18. Improving and Increasing communication is preferred and based on Citizen Access to Information this, cities update, reform, evolve, and advance communication tools and often, Issue: State law requires that cities publish they do so with limited means and resources certain types of information in a"qualified" to ensure citizens have access to information newspaper designated by the city. While the about their city. requirements vary based on city population size, most cities must publish ordinances Because of the publishing mandate outlined before they can take effect; advertisements in state statute, cities continue to publish in for bids; various financial reports; meeting newspapers with limited resources while and hearing notices; notices of elections; simultaneously providing information to dates for filing affidavits of candidacy; and citizens in the format they actually demand sample ballots. Collectively, these items are online. These requirements originated in referred to as "official notices," legal 1949 and to ensure the original intent of the notices" and"public notices" in state statute. law—providing citizens access to their local 26 government—it is time to eliminate these administrative proceedings has kept outdated requirements and make enforcement at the local level and reduced communicating with citizens more efficient. pressure on over-burdened district court systems. Cities using administrative Response: The Legislature should enforcement processes experience a lower eliminate outdated and unnecessary cost of enforcement and a quicker resolution publication requirements that are no to code violations. longer relevant or representative of the technology we now have that has Minnesota statutes expressly provide the significantly increased access to authority for all cities to utilize government. Cities should have the administrative enforcement of local codes authority to: and enforcement of liquor license and tobacco license violations. a) Determine whether web publication should replace or supplement In 2009, the Legislature amended Minn. newspaper publication based on the Stat. ch. 169, the chapter of law pertaining unique needs of each community. to state traffic regulations, to allow cities and counties to issue administrative citations b) Designate an appropriate publication for certain minor traffic offenses. Since the that reaches the maximum number of passage of the 2009 administrative traffic citizens possible. citations law, some people have questioned whether administrative citations for non- c) Use alternative means of traffic, liquor, and tobacco license code communication to fulfill statutory violations can be legally issued by statutory requirements such as city newsletters, cities given that state law does not expressly cable television,video streaming, e- provide authority on other code matters. mail,blogs and city websites. Response: The League of Minnesota d) Expand the use of summaries where Cities continues to support the use of city information is technical or lengthy. administrative fines for local regulatory ordinances, such as building codes, zoning e) Publish and provide public access to codes, health codes,public nuisance local codes of ordinances on a website ordinances, and regulatory matters that accessible to the public and to post are not duplicative of misdemeanor or revisions and changes to city codes, higher-level state traffic and criminal resolutions, and rules on the city offenses. The Legislature should clarify website,when feasible. that both statutory and home rules charter cities have the authority to issue SD-19. Administrative Fines for administrative citations for code Code Violations violations. Further, state statute should allow statutory and home rule charter Issue: Many statutory and home rule charter cities to adjudicate administrative cities have implemented administrative citations and to assess a lien on properties enforcement programs for violations of local for unpaid administrative fines. regulatory ordinances such as building codes, zoning codes, health codes, and public nuisance ordinances. This use of 27 SD-20. Contracting and Purchasing reforms that give cities the flexibility to provide quality goods and services at the Issue: Minnesota statutes stipulate lowest cost to taxpayers. contracting and purchasing requirements for Minnesota cities. The law prescribes the SD-21. City Enterprise Operations process political subdivisions must use to make purchases and award contracts, and Issue: Historically, city enterprise requires a competitive sealed bid procedure operations have been created in response to for contracts or purchases over$175,000. community needs, lack of a private market, The intent of these statutory requirements is financial reporting requirements, state and to provide taxpayers with the best value for federal mandates, to enforce state and local their dollar and ensure integrity in the law, and to ensure a quality of life for the process. However, imposing these statutory residents of a community. Establishing an requirements may, at times, result in enterprise operation allows a city to provide political subdivisions paying more for goods a desired service while maintaining financial and services than private entities under the control over service levels, costs, and public same circumstances. inputs. The Legislature recognized the benefits In some cases, enterprise operations produce associated with alternative purchasing general public benefits and may require methods when it amended municipal public support to ensure a desired level of contracting law in 2004 to authorize the use service at a reasonable cost. The benefits of of reverse auctions to purchase supplies, an enterprise operation, therefore, should be materials, and equipment. Similarly, other evaluated not solely in terms of profitability contracting procedures, including "design- but also on the service benefits to citizens of build" and direct negotiation are proven the community. alternatives to the formal bidding process. Authorizing broader use of these types of Response: The League of Minnesota alternatives as the Legislature did in 2009 by Cities supports the local decisions made authorizing a design-build pilot program, by cities to deliver services by establishing would enhance the ability of cities to make a city enterprise operation. The state appropriate and fiscally responsible should refrain from infringing on the purchasing decisions. ability of a city to provide services for its community. Response: The League of Minnesota Cities supports broader use of alternative SD-22. Preservation of Order in contracting and purchasing methods that City Council Meetings streamline the process and reduce local purchasing costs. Specifically,the League Issue: The Minnesota Supreme Court supports authorizing cities to use the recently held a provision in Minn. Stat. § design-build procedure and providing 609.72, subd. 1(2), that prohibits disturbing municipalities with broader authority, public meetings was unconstitutionally similar to that of private businesses, to broad. State v. Hensel, A15-0005 (Minn. directly negotiate contracts. The 2017). Minn. Stat. § 412.191 gives statutory Legislature should establish a task force authority to city councils to preserve order to review municipal contracting laws, and and regulate procedure at their meetings. consider contracting and purchasing Cities rarely relied on the struck-down 28 statute, but instead used other avenues to statewide interests. Utilizing maintain order, such as issuing warnings and constitutional amendments to change enforcing decorum rules. The struck-down public policy circumvents this process. statute served as a last resort when other options did not work. Therefore, the League supports requiring a supermajority vote (two-thirds in Response: The Legislature should ensure support) by the Legislature to put an statutes adequately balance public amendment on the ballot. participation with the ability to effectively manage public meetings and protect SD-24. Initiative and Referendum public safety. Issue: The Legislature has frequently SD-23. Constitutional Amendments considered legislation to establish initiative and referendum by proposing to place a Issue: The Minnesota Constitution requires question for voter approval on the state that a constitutional amendment be approved general election ballot to amend the state by a simple majority of both chambers of the constitution to allow voters to initiate or Legislature at one session, and must then be repeal state laws by submitting a petition ratified by a majority of all the voters voting which would cause such questions to be at the election. Minnesota is one of 18 states placed on the state general election ballot. that require a simple majority vote by legislators while 26 states require a higher Response: Cities strongly support our threshold(17 states require a two-thirds representational system of governance majority and nine require a three-fifths and,therefore, oppose amending the state majority). Since statehood, 215 proposed constitution to provide for initiative and constitutional amendments have been voted referendum. The Legislature is the on by the electorate; 120 of them have been appropriate governing body to consider approved(56%) and 95 rejected(44%). and enact public policy that reflects statewide interests. Cities provide a variety of critical and essential services to residents of Minnesota. The process of adopting state law based Many public policy decisions at the state on good public policy is best upheld and level impact cities and therefore, city supported by increasing the officials depend on their state legislators to accountability and responsiveness of the represent city interests at the Legislature. legislative process, not by circumventing it. Presenting complex issues to voters in Additionally,unlike a statutory change, a the guise of direct democracy further constitutional amendment is difficult to weakens representative government. modify or repeal once enacted. A state constitutional amendment to Response: The League of Minnesota provide for initiative and referendum Cities strongly supports our subjects cities and their residents and representational system of government taxpayers to the unintended outcomes of and opposes laws and amendments that sometimes unwise attempts to place restrict local government. The Legislature significant public policy decisions into the is the appropriate governing body to hands of special interests that can raise consider and enact laws that reflect 29 unlimited funds for the purpose of not traditionally been included within promoting their more narrow interests. the immunity (e.g., state trails over municipal utility easements). SD-25. Civil Liability of Local Governments e) Preserving changes to Minnesota's joint and several liability laws that Issue: One of the barriers to the delivery of require a municipality to be at least 50 governmental services and programs is the percent at fault to be held responsible exposure of local governments and their for 100 percent of a damage award. officials to civil damage claims. The state has acted to protect itself and its local 0 Reasonable limits on the amount and governments by enacting exceptions and circumstances in which statutory limitations to liability suits, and authorizing attorney fees may be awarded in order self-insurance and other mechanisms to deal to encourage settlement by all parties with claims allowed by law. and decrease the likelihood of litigation. Response: The League of Minnesota Cities supports: g) Preserving the essential structure of the local government tort liability caps a) Creating an exception to municipal in Minn. Stat. § 466.04. tort indemnification law, Minn. Stat. § 466.07,where an employee is defended SD-26. Private Property Rights and and indemnified for claims under a Takings contract of insurance carried by the employee. Issue: In the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court's 2005 decision,Kelo v. City of New b) Extending the protection of the state London, 545 U.S. 469, which upheld the and municipal Tort Claims Act to ability of local governments to use eminent quasi-governmental entities when domain for economic development performing public services such as purposes, the Legislature enacted significant firefighting or licensed third-party restrictions on cities' use of eminent domain ambulance providers that contract for economic development and with a municipality to provide redevelopment, and imposed new ambulance services. compensation and procedural requirements that apply to all condemnation actions, c) Existing constitutional safeguards for including those for traditional public uses protecting public and private property such as roads,parks, and schools. interests without any statutory Legislation to control cities' abilities to expansion of property rights. perform regulatory acts—such as road rights-of-way condemnation, shooting range d) Clarifying and maintaining the zoning, and amortization—has also received applicability of municipal immunity in strong support from legislators. In addition, various areas, including, but not some legislators would like to authorize limited to,vicarious official immunity businesses to seek inverse condemnation and park and recreational immunity, when a governmental entity enters the including the extension to entities business market and provides competing providing a public service that have goods or services or limits the number of 30 businesses that can operate privately or a) Authorizes cities to use eminent receive public contracts. domain for economic development and redevelopment projects that Such legislative initiatives threaten a wide advance a greater public good that array of planning, environmental, historic benefits the community. preservation, and land conservation measures and undermine the fundamental b) Empowers local elected officials to responsibility of cities to protect the public determine whether a particular taking health, safety, and welfare of its citizens. of property serves a public purpose. In 2006, the Legislature enacted Minn. Stat. c) Creates incentives to encourage § 117.031, a statute related to attorney fees landowners to voluntarily sell their in the eminent domain process. The property to the public for structure of the statute has resulted in development or redevelopment. attorney fee awards in eminent domain actions that have no relationship to the d) More appropriately balances awards outcome of the case, serve only to encourage of attorney fees and costs of litigation litigation, and shift limited public funding with the outcome of the eminent away from infrastructure projects. domain proceeding. Response: State law must continue to SD-27. Organized Solid Waste provide cities with the tools needed to Collection balance the rights of private property owners with the interests of the public. Issue: "Organized collection"refers to a The League of Minnesota Cities opposes situation where a local unit of government, legislation that diminishes the ability of for any of a variety of reasons, decides that cities to act in the best interest of the there is a public interest served by limiting health, safety, and welfare of its citizens; the number of solid waste and recycling that increases the cost of doing business collection services available in the area. The for the public good; or that creates the reasons for implementing organized possibility of additional lawsuits against collection can vary, but include: cities. a) Public safety concerns caused by the Specifically, the League opposes number and frequency of large trucks legislation that: moving quickly through residential neighborhoods; a) Allows businesses to seek inverse condemnation when a city provides b) Reducing wear on public infrastructure competing goods or services, or limits from heavy truck traffic; the number of private operators. c) Improving the efficiency, cost and b) Creates an automatic cause of action quality of garbage and recycling service for damages any time a local provided to local residents; regulatory action impacts the use or reduces the value of private property. d) Cooperating with other local governments to best meet solid waste The League supports legislation that: management and recycling objectives; 31 e) Taking local steps to reduce energy precedent that, if applied to other impacts of public services; and government purchasing and service contracting decisions, would clearly run f) Meeting the requirements of county counter to the public purpose of government ordinances and solid waste management providing services at the lowest feasible cost plans as required under Minn. Stat. § to taxpayers. 115.94. Response: The League of Minnesota Cities opposes efforts to apply inverse Organized collection is also encouraged in condemnation claims to city solid waste state solid waste policies as a means of contracting decisions or to allow improving the efficiency and coordination of automatic contractual damage claims for solid waste management between local units solid waste haulers that lose competitive of government. There are very specific and bids in organized collection communities. burdensome public procedures laid out in statute defining how such a decision must be Further,the League supports the current publicly vetted and approved and over what state policy that organized collection is a time period that can occur. valuable tool as part of a comprehensive solid waste and recycling management Despite all of these important and valid program and recognizes the need to reasons for using organized collection, protect and preserve the authority of legislation has been discussed in several cities to adopt solid waste service recent sessions that would allow special contracts that protect public safety, the takings claims or contractual damages to be environment and public infrastructure. claimed by the solid waste industry if local governments make decisions that limit the SD-28. Private Well Drilling number of companies that can collect garbage in a community in a manner that Issue: The state has continued to place prevents a company currently operating in requirements on public water supply the community from continuing to do so providers to add drinking water treatment through the implementation of organized and testing, to restrict the volume of water collection. The unspecified and ongoing used, and to increase the cost of water use liability this change would create would through fees and requirements on utility rate have the effect of eliminating organized structures. As a result, many water users are collection as a waste management option. choosing to obtain all or portions of their This change would also create a virtual water from wells they place on their own monopoly situation for any company property. This creates risks to public health awarded a solid waste contract under and safety, can affect the surrounding organized collection. The local unit of environment, can affect city water supplies, government would have to "buy out" a and can leave city water utilities with contractor in the future to change providers, massive losses of customer load and rate even if their services were no longer the revenue. lowest bid. It also creates an incentive for bidders under organized collection to submit Providing clean, safe, cost-efficient drinking high bids, as they would be eligible for water to citizens is an essential service damages if they fail to win without having to provided by 726 active municipal water provide service. Furthermore, this is a systems. The Minnesota Department of 32 Health (MDH) agrees that cities have the and wastewater management, and local statutory authority to determine whether economic development. Local governments private wells are an appropriate use within can take a lead on these issues by choosing their boundaries and that cities must protect to incorporate aspects of sustainable the public water supplies from numerous development into their local operations and private wells in city boundaries. Private facilities. They can also develop local wells in a city increase the risk of policies and regulations that support and contaminating public water supplies and guide individual and private sustainability encourage over use of water. Cities have the efforts. The ability of a city to affect these authority to regulate and even prohibit changes can, however, be restricted by private wells by local ordinance. policies and requirements imposed by other levels of government. Response: The League of Minnesota Cities supports current law that Sustainable development initiatives can authorizes cities to protect public health cover a wide range of issues, but share the and safety through local controls benefit of lessening the future environmental regulating or prohibiting private wells impacts of communities on the land, air, and being placed within municipal water water in their area. Lakes, streams, rivers, utility service boundaries and would wetlands, wildlife habitat, shoreland areas, oppose any changes to law to remove that and other natural resources can be protected authority. and enhanced in quality through local efforts. Energy efficiency and renewable SD-29. Sustainable Development energy production reduce the energy demands of a community and the Issue: Minnesota cities spend significant environmental impacts of energy time and resources planning for growth, production. By more efficiently using public development, and redevelopment that will infrastructure and minimizing resource best serve the future needs of their residents. consumption, the costs to individuals, Numerous factors are considered as part of business, and government can be reduced. that process, but an area of increasing New and expanded business and job interest involves concepts often categorized opportunities are also generated by the as "sustainable development."Minn. Stat. § "green"products and services needed to 4A.07, subd. 1(b), defines this term, as it implement sustainable development pertains to local government, to mean initiatives. The ideal result of well-planned "development that maintains or enhances sustainability, natural resources economic opportunity and community well- management, and conservation efforts is a being while protecting and restoring the city that is more efficient in the use of its natural environment upon which people and resources and infrastructure, creates fewer economies depend. Sustainable environmental problems for future development meets the needs of the present generations to address, and is a more without compromising the ability of future desirable home for residents and businesses. generations to meet their own needs." Response: The League of Minnesota Cities play a key role in fostering Cities supports federal, state, and sustainable development and other regional efforts to promote sustainable conservation practices due to their role in development where the effectiveness of land use planning and zoning, stormwater the proposed practice is supported by 33 sound science, and as long as those efforts strategies focused on integrated do not supersede the authority of local design, energy efficiency, water governments to determine their own conservation, stormwater policies regarding land use and related management, waste reduction, issues. pollution prevention, indoor environmental quality, and the use of Providing technical assistance and low-impact building materials and financial incentives, and streamlining products. regulations to encourage local governments and private property owners e) Supporting sustainable economic to engage in sustainable development development, such as brownfield practices, as well as assisting in education clean-up, on-site stormwater and information efforts for the building management, and sustainable business industry and the public, are the best practices and technologies. means to generate successful results. These programs should focus on f) Assisting and recognizing local outcomes, allowing flexibility in how to governments that take actions to best meet those outcomes in different reduce greenhouse gas emissions and locations and situations. The League increase energy efficiency by opposes mandates that limit the authority providing and identifying technical of cities to determine what practices will assistance, financial assistance, and best meet the needs of their communities. best practices. The League supports sustainable SD-30. Advanced Energy Building development efforts that meet the above Standards criteria, including programs proposed in the following areas: Issue: The State of Minnesota has made a strong statutory commitment to the a) Shifting public resources, services, reduction of carbon emissions and investments, purchasing power, and greenhouse gases. As part of that effort, procurement toward more projects funded by the state must meet a set economically and environmentally of energy requirements called Sustainable sustainable outcomes where those Building 2030, or SB 2030. However, to solutions are cost effective and meet state energy efficiency goals, appropriate. improvements in energy performance of buildings not financed by the state will also b) Using local land-use planning and be needed. zoning to protect and enhance limited natural resources, and reduce the The State Building Code sets the standards impacts of growth and development that must be met in new or substantially on local infrastructure. retrofitted structures and prohibits local requirements that differ from that code. The c) Promoting efficient and renewable current state schedule for the amendment energy sources. and adoption of more stringent building and d) Encouraging sustainable building energy codes is not adequate to result in the design, construction, and operation state meeting those goals. 34 Cities working on improving the energy Minnesota needs to change its approach in performance of development within their order to meet state energy efficiency goals. communities have identified a clear opportunity to establish cost-effective Response: The legislature should require energy-efficiency performance standards for the Department of Labor and Industry to new and substantially reconstructed either establish an advanced energy commercial, industrial, and institutional building standard beyond the base buildings that can significantly reduce statewide commercial code for the carbon dioxide emissions by lowering construction, reconstruction, and energy use in those structures. alteration of public and private commercial and multifamily residential Two solutions have been proposed. One, buildings that exceed a certain square referred to as an advanced energy building footage as an appendix of the State standard, creates an optional tier of Building Code, or should adopt the additional energy efficiency requirements advanced energy standard as part of the for buildings in those categories if they State Building Code. exceed a designated square footage. Such an addendum would be state-developed and These standards should conform to cities could choose whether to apply it in timelines and performance measures that their jurisdictions based on community result in net zero carbon emissions by priorities, opportunity, and readiness. An 2036 or sooner and should be updated advanced energy building standard would every three to five years. If it is an allow municipalities to require more energy appendix, cities should be provided the efficient buildings, reducing the energy authority to adopt the advanced energy burden for building occupants and lowering standard by ordinance at their discretion, overall greenhouse gas emissions. making it an official addendum to the baseline energy code in any jurisdiction A second would have the state adopt a adopting them. universal advanced energy building standard within the State Building Code. In either The League recognizes the benefits of a solution, having a uniform set of standards consistent state code and supports a prevents confusion by developers, designers, requirement that a local jurisdiction planners, and regulators, with people only adopting the standards in the appendix needing to know if the jurisdiction uses the may not amend them but may specify the requirements outlined in existing State minimum size structure to which they Building Code or has adopted the added apply, as long as it is 10,000 or more energy section. square feet. Discussions with developers, architects, SD-31. Construction Codes engineers, city staff, energy efficiency experts,utility interests, labor, state Issue: The State Building Code (SBC) is the agencies, academia, and other stakeholders statewide standard for the construction, have examined approaches the state could reconstruction, alteration, and repair of the use to create and allow an advanced energy buildings and other structures of the type building standard. While several different governed by the code. A building code versions could work, it is clear that provides many benefits, including uniformity of construction standards in the 35 building industry, consistency in code Enforcing the State Building Code should interpretation and enforcement, and life- remain a local option for the safety guidance. Since 2018, the state will municipalities that have not already adopt a new version of the SBC every six adopted the Code, unless the state fully years after a rulemaking process that allows funds the costs of enforcement and for significant public input. The League inspection services necessary to enforce a supports adopting and amending the SBC statewide building code. If the Legislature through the rulemaking process, and requires all cities to enforce the State opposes legislative changes to the building Building Code, local governments must codes absent unusual or extraordinary have the option to hire or select a building circumstances. official of their choice and set the appropriate level of service—even if the While all cities must enforce certain codes— state fully funds code enforcement such as the accessibility code and the activities. bleacher safety code—enforcement of the SBC remains a local option for cities outside The state should collaborate with local of the seven-county metropolitan area with governments, construction industry fewer than 2,500 people that did not adopt representatives, and other stakeholders to the code before Jan. 1, 2008. Requiring review the building and energy codes and enforcement of the SBC by smaller cities in consider modifications to encourage Greater Minnesota is cost-prohibitive for sustainable building design, construction, many cities, and would result in an unfunded and operation. mandated. Specifically: While a single set of coordinated codes helps provide consistency in code a) For purposes of federal conformity, administration and enforcement, the state should adopt the implementation of sustainable building International Energy Conservation design, construction, and operation does not Code as part of the State Building readily integrate with the existing state Code. building and energy code system. As a result, many cities are interested in adopting b) The Legislature should authorize an advanced energy building standard cities to voluntarily adopt a uniform beyond the base statewide commercial code advanced energy building standard for the construction, reconstruction, and with stronger local standards for alteration of public and private commercial development and conservation that buildings. An advanced energy building will help inform the baseline state standard would allow municipalities to code development process. require more energy efficient buildings, reducing the energy burden for building SD-32. Building Officials occupants and lowering overall greenhouse gas emissions. Issue: There is a shortage of certified building officials in Minnesota. This Response:A statewide-enforced building shortage is particularly acute in Greater code may have benefits, but requiring it Minnesota where some cities have trouble would result in an unfunded mandate. finding certified building officials to perform inspections required by state law. 36 Minnesota needs to hire a new generation of education efforts should include training certified building officials and must ensure to assist local building officials gain the that current officials have adequate training requisite experience to qualify for and opportunity to inspect a wide range of delegation of state-licensed facilities and projects. In light of emerging technologies public buildings. The Legislature should and offsite building methods such as encourage the Minnesota Department of panelization and modular construction, it is Labor and Industry to provide training important that certified building officials opportunities to ensure certified building have training opportunities that address officials across the state have the skills inspection processes for new trends in and expertise to provide onsite homebuilding. inspections of buildings constructed by new building methods such as The Department of Labor and Industry panelization and modular construction. (DLI)has authority over state-licensed facilities and public buildings. Pursuant to The League urges the state to make Minn. Stat. § 326B.106, subd. 2, it must surplus revenue from the building permit delegate authority to inspect projects on surcharge available to local governments these buildings to a municipality if DLI to help defray the cost of complying with determines that the municipality has code official training and education adequate qualified local building officials to requirements. perform plan review or inspection of the projects. In 2014 the Legislature passed SD-33. Disability Access legislation requested by the League of Requirements Minnesota Cities and agreed to by DLI to provide more transparency and clarity to the Issue: Title II of the Americans with delegation process. DLI, after consulting Disabilities Act(ADA) of 1990 requires that local governments and the League, state and local governments provide people implemented a new delegation procedure as with disabilities equal opportunity to benefit required by statute. Although the new from all of their programs, services, and delegation process is a significant activities. Public entities are not required to improvement, it can still be difficult for take actions that would result in significant local building officials to achieve the financial and administrative burdens, but experience necessary to be delegated full they must modify policies,practices, and inspection authority. procedures to avoid discrimination unless they can demonstrate that doing so would Response: Minnesota's housing and fundamentally alter the nature of the service, construction industries depend on the program, or activity being provided. work of local building officials, and cities that enforce the State Building Code State and local governments are also endeavor to provide quality code required to follow specific standards when administration and enforcement. The constructing new facilities and altering State must increase its efforts to train new existing public buildings, and they must building officials and must provide relocate programs or otherwise provide sufficient education to help local officials access in inaccessible older buildings. Under efficiently administer and enforce the ADA, public entities are not necessarily construction regulations to protect the required to make each existing facility health and safety of citizens. These accessible. However, their programs—when 37 viewed in their entirety—must be readily SD-34. Assaults on Code accessible to people with disabilities. A Enforcement Officials public entity may achieve program accessibility through various methods. For Issue: Many city employees and contractors example, a city may alter existing facilities, are required to enforce city codes and acquire or construct new facilities, relocate a ordinances and state statutes and rules as service or program to an accessible facility, part of their job duties. Code enforcement or provide services at other accessible sites. can involve denying a building permit, ordering a landlord to make repairs to rental One district court judge has taken an properties, or fining property owners for expansive view of disability access failing to abate a nuisance. Because of the requirements for public recreation facilities. nature of their job, code enforcement The case involved a parent who sued a city officials can be subjected to verbal assaults, due to difficulty viewing soccer and baseball threats, and physical violence. games on certain city fields. The court, in interpreting the Minnesota Human Rights Minnesota law recognizes the need to Act(MHRA), held that any public facility is protect certain employees whose jobs make a public service. Since the MHRA requires it more likely that they will be the target of that every public service be accessible to assaults by escalating assault charges from disabled persons, the court concluded that fifth to fourth degree for the assaults of each and every playing field and other peace officers, firefighters, school officials, public facility must be fully accessible. The and"public employees with mandated court rejected the ADA's limitations on duties". Minn. Stat. § 609.2231, subd. 6, modifications for physical access to older specifically defines "public employees with facilities, as well as the ADA's "when mandated duties" as agricultural inspectors, viewed in its entirety" language for program occupational safety and health inspectors, access. The result is a more restrictive state child protection workers, public health standard for physical access to public nurses, animal control officers, and facilities than required by the ADA and the probation or parole officers. An assault on State Building Code. one of these employees who is engaged in the performance of a duty mandated by law, Response: The League of Minnesota court order, or ordinance, is a gross Cities supports changes to the MHRA misdemeanor if the person knows the that will make state accessibility employee is engaged in the performance of standards compatible with the federal official duties and inflicts demonstrable ADA for public services and facilities. bodily harm. The Legislature should clarify that a facility that is in compliance with Under current law, an assault on a code Accessibility Code provisions of the State enforcement official not enumerated in Building Code meets the physical access Minn. Stat. § 609.2231, subd. 6, while requirements of the MHRA. State law performing official business can only be should also specify that accessibility charged as fifth degree assault, a requirements apply to public programs misdemeanor,unless it results in substantial and services as a whole, rather than to bodily harm. All code enforcement officials each individual aspect of a public should be afforded the same protections program or service. under Minnesota Statutes, and the legislature 38 should amend the statute to expand the firearm, including a military-style assault employees covered by the statute. rifle. Response: The legislature should expand Response: The League of Minnesota Minn. Stat. § 609.2231, subd. 6, to include Cities requests an amendment to the code enforcement officials. The term code Citizens Personal Protection Act that enforcement official should be defined would allow cities to prohibit firearms in broadly to include public employees and city-owned buildings, facilities, and parks. contractors whose jobs require them to The League supports clarifying the Act to enforce all administrative codes, rules, state that a permit holder, under the ordinances, and state laws. terms of a permit, is allowed to carry a pistol-length firearm,but not a SD-35. Restrictions on Possession of semiautomatic military-style assault Firearms weapon. The League is not seeking a repeal of the Citizens Personal Protection Issue: The Minnesota Citizens Personal Act, nor authority to prohibit legal Protection Act, also known as "conceal-and- weapons in parking lots or on city streets carry,"prohibits guns on most school and sidewalks. The League also supports properties but forbids other local units of efforts by commercial property owners to government from prohibiting loaded clarify that the prohibition on restricting firearms on their properties. The possession by tenants and their guests inconsistencies in the law's treatment of applies only to residential rental property. different kinds of properties have caused confusion about how the law applies to SD-36. Public Safety multi-use facilities, such as municipal ice Communications arenas used for school-sponsored programs. Issue: The state role in financing public Further, the law gives private property safety communications has important cost owners the right to prohibit guns in their implications for cities. The state needs to establishments, but prohibits landowners accept financial responsibility for use by from restricting firearm possession by cities of the state public safety radio tenants and their guests without communications backbone. Cities have distinguishing between residential and struggled to pay high expenses to participate commercial properties. This creates in the 800 MHz statewide public safety confusion for shopping malls and other retail system. properties with large common areas that are not occupied by the tenants but which the In previous state budgets, the Legislature tenants and their customers must cross to turned to revenue sources upon which cities access the tenant's space. depend to cover costs to purchase and operate new communications technology Finally, the Citizens Personal Protection Act and hardware for computer-aided dispatch, does not explicitly state the type of firearm a 911 public safety answering points (PSAPs), permit holder may carry, and this has led to and interoperable radio communications ambiguity regarding whether the law is equipment and subsystems in order to limited to the right to carry a pistol-length finance the build-out of the state backbone firearm in public or if it allows for any for the new system. As a result, fees were directed to fund revenue bond debt service 39 used to complete the statewide build-out of professional licensure, immigration, etc. the Allied Radio Matrix for Emergency They can impact successful reentry and Response (ARMER) and the cost of rehabilitation of offenders. operations of the state public safety radio communications backbone. Current law allows for the expungement of criminal records, which is an extraordinary At the federal level, the Federal remedy because it involves the competing Communications Commission(FCC)has interests of individuals who want to remove ordered reservation of 700 MHz wireless the stigma of an arrest or conviction when spectrum for a national interoperable pursuing things such as employment and broadband network to meet public safety housing and the public's interest in communications needs. FirstNet was maintaining criminal histories for future established in 2012 as an independent criminal investigations and making hiring, authority within the National rental, and other decisions about individuals. Telecommunications and Information Administration(NTIA) and is responsible Expungements are not granted unless the for constructing a nationwide high-speed court determines that the benefits to the public safety wireless broadband network. individual outweigh the disadvantages to the public and public safety. When the court is Response: The League of Minnesota making this determination, it must take into Cities supports continued and increased consideration the following factors: state financing of substantial local costs to participate in ARMER, including the a) The nature and severity of the acquisition and modernization of underlying crime; subscriber equipment, such as portable b The risk, if any, the person poses to and mobile radios required for ARMER ) users. The League also opposes efforts to individuals or society; divert dedicated ARMER funds to the state's general fund. The Legislature c) The length of time since the crime should fund regional cooperation and occurred, partnerships for effective delivery of 911 d) The steps taken by the person toward service, training and use of ARMER. rehabilitation; The League also urges the FCC to e) Aggravating or mitigating factors continue to support availability of relating to the underlying crime; wireless spectrum necessary to expand channel capacity that allows local public f) The reasons for expungement, safety agencies to meet future needs of including attempts to obtain cities and other local units of government. employment housing or other SD-37. Collateral Consequences necessities; and Expungements g) The criminal record; Issue: Collateral consequences of criminal h) The record of employment and records has been discussed at the federal and community involvement; state levels. Collateral consequences are adverse impacts on housing, employment, 40 i) The recommendations of law statutory factors that must be considered enforcement, prosecutors, and under current expungement law. The corrections; interests of rehabilitated individuals seeking expungement to live without the j) The recommendations of victims or stigma of an arrest or conviction record whether victims of the underlying should be balanced with the public's crime were minors; interest in maintaining criminal histories for future criminal investigations and to k) Outstanding restitution obligations to make safe hiring, rental, and other victims; and decisions about individuals. The current statutory scheme provides that balance, 1) Any other relevant factors. and thus, any future legislation should This balancing test is essential to ensure also take the factors into account. competing interests are adequately Safeguards must include notification and considered. involvement of victims. Recently, the state legislature has discussed SD-38. Criminal and Juvenile whether to authorize automatic Justice Information expungements in certain situations. Cities understand the impact of collateral Issue: Criminal justice information consequences but have concerns with integration is about getting the right automatically expunging criminal records. information into the hands of the right While expungements play an important role, people at the right time and in the right place automatic expungements should adequately to make key decisions throughout the balance the interests of the individual criminal justice process. The integration of seeking expungement and the interests of the criminal justice information remains public and public safety. For example, complex and multifaceted. It takes time and demonstration of steps taken towards resources from all levels of government. rehabilitation are essential so using only a Public safety is compromised when there is short time factor is insufficient to show true a lack of centralized, complete, and accurate rehabilitation. criminal history data about individuals, incidents, and cases. Response: The League supports legislation addressing the collateral City officials are aware of the complex consequences of criminal records in a issues raised by the utilization of electronic balanced manner that helps rehabilitated record keeping, data sharing, and access to individuals succeed and ensures public records that identify data subjects. The safety and victim interests are met. The League of Minnesota Cities recognizes that League is also in support of legislation one of the ongoing challenges with the and policies that help provide individuals integration of criminal and juvenile justice with proper notice of the options and the information is meeting the requirements of process for expungements that exist in the Minnesota Government Data Practices current law. Act(MGDPA). The League opposes legislation that does More than 500 cities operate police not adequately address the important departments. These departments vary dramatically in fiscal capacity, staffing 41 resources, and technical expertise. Further, a) Requires pawnbrokers to record all each municipal law enforcement agency has transactions, including details of the item unique operating procedures, strengths, and pawned or sold, information about the needs based on the community it serves. The customer and the cost of the transaction. League knows the integration and security access to criminal and juvenile justice b) Requires pawnbrokers to maintain information systems has a significant impact records of all transactions for three on municipal police business practices. years, and to make records available upon request to law enforcement Response: The League of Minnesota agencies. Cities supports continued efforts by the state to integrate and make available c) Allows pawnbrokers to charge a criminal justice information systems. This maximum monthly interest rate of 3 includes efforts in key areas of funding, percent of the principal amount loaned in data practices, collaborative a transaction,plus a reasonable fee for relationships, balancing privacy and storage and services. public safety, and addressing aging systems. The League also supports the The Automated Property System (APS) is a Criminal and Juvenile Justice computerized system for tracking and Information Advisory Group, cooperation monitoring pawn transactions. The purpose among legislators, law enforcement, of the APS is to provide a tool to verify corrections agents, court officials, compliance with Minn. Stat. ch. 325J, to prosecutors, community groups, and help identify and minimize illegal activity, businesses that build public support for to recover stolen property, and to provide a criminal justice systems. legitimate environment for consumers. Currently, almost 260 law enforcement To ensure compliance with the MGDPA, agencies and over 190 stores in Minnesota comprehensive guidelines and operational and Wisconsin participate in the APS system practices should be implemented to as either a"query only" or"contributing" safeguard access to and use of criminal member. and juvenile justice data. However, data practices policies should not create new, All access to and use of information in the unfunded mandates for local units of APS system is governed by the Minnesota government or compromise the usefulness Data Practices Act. Only authorized users of criminal and juvenile justice systems have access to the data. There is no public by creating unnecessary barriers. access to the data. Further, data that would reveal the identity of persons who are SD-39. Pawn Shop Regulation and customers of a licensed pawnbroker or Use of the Automated Property secondhand goods dealer are private data on System (APS) individuals and only used for law enforcement purposes. Data describing the Issue: Minn. Stat. ch. 325J enables licensure property in a regulated transaction with a for pawnbrokers and provides statewide licensed pawnbroker or secondhand goods minimum regulations for the pawn industry. dealer is public. Specifically, the law: Original pawn and secondhand transactions reported to the APS carry a $1 fee, 42 regardless of the number of items involved. SD-40. City Costs for Enforcing All subsequent updates or corrections to State and Local Laws transactions are processed without charge. Contributing jurisdictions may also add Issue: Cities experience substantial costs regulatory costs to the transaction fee. The enforcing state and local laws,particularly total transaction fee is then typically those related to traffic, controlled assessed by the dealer to the customer. substances, and incarceration of prisoners. The current method in our criminal justice A bill that would weaken Minn. Stat. ch. system of recovering costs for law 325J and restrict the use of the APS has enforcement and prosecution through fines been introduced in the Minnesota is insufficient to meet the costs incurred by Legislature. Specifically, the legislation local governments. Further, when a violator would forbid law enforcement agents from requests relief from paying the full amount acquiring customer information from pawn of the fine and surcharge, the courts have and secondhand shops until they have been more inclined to waive the fine than to probable cause to do so, and would reduce the surcharge. When this occurs, the eliminate the authority of local units of local units of government recover no costs government to more strictly regulate pawn even though the city has incurred expenses. and secondhand dealers. Response: The Legislature should review Response: The League of Minnesota this issue and adopt measures that Cities supports the authority of cities to provide for complete reimbursement of regulate and license pawnbrokers, and the costs incurred by local governments in opposes any legislation that would remove enforcing state and local laws. Solutions the authority of local governments to that should be considered include: enact more restrictive regulations than currently exist in Minn. Stat. ch. 325J. a) Increasing fine amounts. The League supports the authority of b) Removing or modifying county and cities to set licensing and transaction fees state surcharges that conflict with cost that enable them to recover their full recovery principles. regulatory and enforcement expenses. c) Requiring the courts to consider The League supports cooperation ordering restitution from the between law enforcement agencies and defendant to reimburse the costs of the pawn industry that enhances the enforcement and prosecution as part ability to identify illegal activity and of any sentence. recover stolen property. Access to transaction information by law a) Requiring that if a court reduces the enforcement agencies is vital to amount paid by a violator, any accomplishing this goal. Further, the reduction should be made from the sharing of information through the use of surcharge and not the fine. the APS is a proactive way to prevent property and other crimes. 43 SD-41. Compensation and care to individuals should be covered by Reimbursement for Public Safety insurance and not be borne exclusively by Services the community's taxpayers. Cities should have the authority to bill for the full cost Issue: Municipal public safety personnel of first responder medical services they often respond to emergencies involving non- provide and to collect on unpaid bills. residents. For example, municipal fire, Insurance companies should be required police, and/or ambulance services may be to reimburse local governments for the dispatched to the scene of a traffic accident full cost of providing these emergency on an interstate highway involving victims medical services. Finally, auto and from other cities or states. Although cities homeowner's insurance policies should be can bill for some public safety services they required to insure for the cost of provide to non-residents, they have limited emergency responses. authority to collect on unpaid bills. SD-42. Administrative Traffic Cities have also found that auto insurance Citations policies vary when it comes to coverage for emergency responses. Insurance companies Issue: Cities have implemented of those responsible for accidents sometimes administrative enforcement programs for deny payment for fire service. violations of local regulatory ordinances, such as building codes, zoning codes, health Additionally, municipal public safety codes, and public nuisance ordinances. This personnel commonly respond to use of administrative proceedings has kept emergencies that require the provision of enforcement at the local level and reduced medical services. The medical services pressure on over-burdened district court provided by the city-employed first systems. responders are part of a continuum of health care that is covered by insurance companies The Legislature has repeatedly increased the when provided by paramedics and other fine surcharge on district court cases to medical care providers; however, insurance generate revenues for the state's general policies vary when it comes to coverage for fund. The surcharge—the amount paid over municipally provided medical services. and above the fine—is now $75 per citation. Insurance companies of those treated by The growth in the surcharge has municipal public safety personnel frequently dramatically increased the cost of citations deny payment for emergency medical and has caused some to question whether the services when they are billed by a total of the fine and surcharge is municipality. disproportionate for minor matters. To lower the amount imposed on their residents, a Thus, when a municipal public safety number of cities have expanded their agency provides first response medical administrative programs to include some assistance, they commonly do so at the offenses traditionally heard in district court, expense of local property taxpayers. such as minor traffic offenses. Response:While emergency medical The increased state surcharges have not been responses are legitimate functions of used to assist local units of government with municipal public safety departments, the the growing costs of enforcement and costs of providing emergency medical prosecution. No matter which entity—city, 44 county or state—issues a statutory citation, SD-43. Juveniles in Municipal Jails the violator pays between $115 and $127 for a minor speeding violation. Of this amount, Issue: Municipal jails have long served as the city receives between $13 and$20, and holding facilities for suspects who are being the county receives just slightly more. questioned and/or booked, and for those awaiting transfer to a county jail or juvenile Further, when a violator requests relief from detention facility. In 2012, the Minnesota paying the full amount of the fine and Department of Corrections (DOC) issued a surcharge, the courts have been more reinterpretation of an existing law to say inclined to waive the fine than to reduce the that, "[W]here counties have secure juvenile surcharge. When this occurs, the local units correctional facilities...juveniles are not of government recover no costs even though allowed to be held in jail and/or municipal the city has incurred expenses. lock-ups for any length of time." In 2009, the Legislature amended the This interpretation is in conflict with a statutes to allow administrative fines to be provision in Minn. Stat. § 260B.181, subd. issued for certain minor traffic offenses. 4, which provides that juveniles can be held Cities report that the short list of offenses in a licensed juvenile facility for up to six noted in that law change does not adequately hours. Many municipal jails, including address the needs of local law enforcement. those in counties where juvenile detention Additional authority is necessary to allow facilities exist, have been operating under law enforcement officers to implement an the six-hour holding law. effective program to reduce violations. Managers of municipal jails indicate the Response: The League of Minnesota reinterpretation of the law is contrary to Cities continues to support the use of city common practice and presents significant administrative fines for local regulatory challenges for municipal law enforcement ordinances, such as building codes,zoning personnel. codes, health codes,public nuisance ordinances and regulatory matters that Response: The League of Minnesota are not duplicative of misdemeanor or Cities supports a statutory clarification higher level state traffic and criminal that would allow juveniles to be held for offenses. Cities should have the authority questioning and booking in licensed jail to issue administrative citations for low- facilities for up to six hours, regardless of level moving and equipment violations whether the county has a juvenile that: 1)would otherwise result in detention facility. warnings, and 2) occur on roadways where the speed limit is 45 miles per hour SD-44. Justice System Funding or less. Issue: Over the past several years, If state leaders choose not to expand the Minnesota's justice system has operated list of administrative traffic offenses,they under consecutive budget shortfalls. Public should then change the distribution of service windows are closed part of each statutory violation fine revenues so that week in many courthouses. Delays in case cities are adequately compensated for filings, hearings and dispositions are enforcement and prosecution costs. building throughout the state as staff and judges struggle to keep up with caseloads. 45 The budget shortfalls limit the ability of the phase of community-focused policing. The courts to process cases pertaining to report contains recommendations related to shoplifting, trespassing, worthless checks, six key areas of law enforcement: traffic and ordinance violations,juvenile truancy, runaways and underage drinking, a) Building Trust and Legitimacy; consumer credit disputes,property-related and small civil claims, and many other b) Policy and Oversight; cases. Timely processing of these cases is critical to keeping communities safe and to c) Technology and Social Media; preserving the quality of life residents d) Community Policing and Crime expect. Reduction; The State Court Administrator has e) Training and Education; and advocated for statutory changes that have resulted in efficiencies and cost savings f) Officer Safety and Wellness. while preserving core services. These changes involve consolidating services Many Minnesota communities have where practicable and using technology to embraced 215t Century Policing concepts, reduce costs. They include centralized and municipal police departments payable processing, use of e-citations and throughout the state have adopted policies restructuring of state mandated programs. that align with 21' Century Policing principles. The Legislature and governor Response: The League of Minnesota made progress toward advancing 215t Cities supports a statement by former Century Policing principles statewide by Chief Justice Eric J. Magnuson that calls enacting the 2020 Police Accountability Act. for"an adequately funded, functioning justice system that resolves disputes In Minnesota,police chiefs have indicated promptly in order to ensure the rule of strong interest in securing additional training law,protect public safety and individual in 215t Century Policing practices for rights and promote a civil society." The officers. Demand for training has increased League supports the use of technology to in recent years, and in 2017 the Legislature reduce costs and preserve services. The responded by increasing continuing League opposes any changes that would education requirements for officers, decriminalize local ordinances,petty expanding the scope of this training to misdemeanors or misdemeanor offenses, include more community policing, and by or that would make prosecution of these providing $6 million per year for training crimes more difficult. reimbursement provided by the Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) SD-45. 21St Century Policing Board. This funding is not permanent and sunsets in 2024. Issue: Published in May 2015, the President's Task Force on 21st Century The POST Board is funded through a special Policing Report makes multiple revenue account from a surcharge on recommendations aimed at helping law criminal and traffic convictions. However, a enforcement agencies and communities significant amount of the special revenues strengthen trust and collaboration, while collected are diverted to the state's general reducing crime by implementing the next fund and are not made available for training 46 reimbursement, and the amount of the e) State and federal funding for peace surcharge paid to the state has been officer safety and wellness initiatives; declining. There is also growing concern about the impact of the surcharge on f) State policies,training and funding residents, particularly those of low income that support co-responder programs and persons of color, and concern about to enhance the safety and effectiveness funding policy training based on ticket of responses involving people with revenue. mental illnesses; Response: The League of Minnesota g) State policies,training and funding Cities recognizes the need for that support non-traditional communities and law enforcement community based public safety agencies to strengthen trust and programs; and collaboration,while continuing to reduce crime. The League supports the h) Authority and grants for municipal recommendations of the President's Task police departments to deploy Force on 21st Century Policing Report as technologies such as dash cameras and well as the training,policy and police body worn cameras that accountability provisions contained in the enhance both criminal justice and 2020 Police Accountability Act. To that officer accountability. end,the League supports: SD-46. Post-Incarceration Living a) POST Board model policies that align Facilities with the recommendations of the President's Task Force on 21st Issue: Sufficient funding and oversight is Century Policing Report and the 2020 needed to ensure that residents living in Police Accountability Act; post-incarceration living facilities have appropriate care and supervision, and that b) POST Board approved training neighborhoods are not disproportionately opportunities for new recruits and in- impacted by high concentrations of these service peace officers that include but types of facilities. Under current law, are not limited to procedural justice, operators of certain post-incarceration living bias/implicit bias and cultural facilities are not required to notify cities awareness, de-escalation, and crisis when they intend to purchase single family intervention training; housing for these purposes. Cities do not have authority to regulate the locations of c) Increased state and federal funding post-incarceration living facilities. Cities for peace officer training that includes have reasonable concerns about the safety of reimbursement for tuition, travel, facility residents and neighborhoods, time and backfilling the shifts of particularly in cases of public safety. Cities officers who are out for training; also have an interest in preserving a balance in residential neighborhoods between this d) Permanent funding for police training type of facilities and other uses. It is in the that is not based on criminal and best interest of providers to inform and work traffic ticket revenue; with cities before opening a facility in order to educate providers of community standards and expectations. 47 Response: Cities should have statutory general pre- and post-disaster emergency authority to require agencies, as well as management programs; 3) ensure a licensed and registered providers,that coordinated and effective national operate post-incarceration living facilities emergency response system; and 4) address to notify the city before properties are issues of cyber security that threaten public operated. Cities should be provided with safety, services, and infrastructure. the necessary contact information once licensed or registered. Providers applying Response: The League of Minnesota to operate post-incarceration living Cities recommends that when the federal facilities should be required to contact the government requires or contracts for city to be informed of applicable local cities' assistance in meeting federal regulations. The Legislature should also homeland security responsibilities,the require establishment of non- federal government should fully cover the concentration standards for post- costs, including the risk of liability arising incarceration living facilities to prevent from these activities. clustering. Finally, licensing or registering authorities must be responsible for The League supports greater federal removing any residents incapable of funding to prepare,train, and equip our living in such an environment, first responders. The League also particularly if they become a danger to supports changes in the federal funding themselves or others. process to ensure Department of Homeland Security funds move quickly to SD-47. Homeland Security Costs the local level. Furthermore,the League and Liability supports the allocation of state resources to provide training and technical Issue: The federal government's response to assistance to local governments related to terrorism has resulted in new responsibilities the prevention and control of cyber for local governments in a number of areas. security risks to critical infrastructure. For example, shortly after the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, the federal SD-48. Cybersecurity government tapped local law enforcement personnel to provide security and perform Issue: Dating back to at least 2012, U.S. screening at our nation's airports. These new Defense Secretaries have warned that the responsibilities increase cities' liability United States are increasingly vulnerable to exposure and result in higher local costs for foreign computer hackers who could public safety services. In addition, local dismantle the nation's power grid, governments are expected to continue transportation system, financial networks emergency planning and capacity building and government. On a state level, the efforts,provide additional training and Governor's Task Force on Broadband issued equipment for first responders, and improve recommendations regarding cybersecurity in their 2016, 2017, and 2018 annual reports. emergency response coordination and communication. After consistent recommendation by the Broadband Task Force, a Legislative As partners in protecting our country from Commission on Cybersecurity was terrorism, the federal government must: 1) established in 2021 to provide oversight of provide greater direct financial support for the state's cybersecurity measures and our first responders; 2) maintain funding for review and make policy recommendations to 48 state agencies and the legislature to SD-49. Legalization of Fireworks strengthen the state's cybersecurity infrastructure.. However, many of the Issue: In 2002, the state enacted a law commission and task force allowing the sale and use of non-aerial, non- recommendations have not yet been explosive consumer fireworks, including implemented, which creates cybersecurity sparklers,party poppers, snakes, and other vulnerabilities especially at the local level as novelty items—relaxing the ban on many communities lack the necessary tools consumer fireworks in place in Minnesota and capabilities needed to protect their since 1941. In 2008, the Legislature further systems. The problem is serious. Each relaxed the ban by increasing the amount of month Minnesota IT Services defends explosive material allowed in legal against roughly 27,000 phishing emails and fireworks. messages across all state agencies and several cities and counties have been recent Local fire service professionals have targets of ransomware attacks as local reported that consumers and law governments continue to remain particularly enforcement personnel have had difficulty vulnerable to cyberattacks. distinguishing between legal and illegal fireworks, and that the 2002 law resulted in Response: The League of Minnesota greater use in Minnesota of illegal fireworks Cities supports state action to identify purchased in other states. and strengthen state and local capabilities. The League supports the According to data provided by the inclusion of funding to evaluate state Minnesota State Fire Marshal Division, government cyber vulnerabilities, single injury trends and dollar losses related to points of failure, and fixes, and, based on fireworks incidents surged after the those findings, create an ability for consumer fireworks ban was lifted. Hospital municipal governments to apply for grant reports reveal that the annual number of funding or assistance to help conduct the injuries caused by fireworks rose same evaluation.Additionally, state and dramatically in 2002 and remains elevated. federal policymakers should: Likewise, Minnesota Fire Incident Reporting System records show that the a) Seek municipal government input on annual dollar loss resulting from fireworks any direction of state or federal incidents increased significantly in 2002 and funding that seeks to address has since grown. cybersecurity preparedness and response and ensure city government In 2003, the state enacted a number of participation in any task force or provisions limiting local authority pertaining planning committee tasked with to fireworks sales. The 2003 law caps the directing funding priorities for local allowable municipal permit fee at $100 per government cybersecurity efforts; vendor selling fireworks with other products, and$350 per vendor selling b) Avoid unfunded mandates related to fireworks exclusively. The law restricts data notification breaches by ensuring cities from requiring fireworks sellers to proactive discussions with lawmakers purchase additional liability insurance. and state leaders regarding Finally, the 2003 law states that cities cannot cybersecurity awareness,prevention, prohibit or restrict the display of consumer remediation and breach notification fireworks if the display and structure comply 49 with National Fire Protection Association evidence. For example, there is less running (NFPA) Standard 1124. The NFPA is a of red lights when motions imaging private international association of recording systems (MIRS) are installed at individuals and trade and professional traffic signals. organizations. (NFPA Standard 1124 is not a public document and is available only for a Response: Local law enforcement fee.) agencies should have the express authority to use photo enforcement Fireworks products can cause serious technology to enforce traffic laws. Local injuries and fire loss. The legal sale of law enforcement officers should have the consumer fireworks undermines fire express authority to issue citations for prevention efforts. The sale and use of traffic violations by mail where the consumer fireworks increase local public violation is detected with photographic safety enforcement, emergency response, evidence. and fire-suppression costs. SD-51. Operation of Motorized Response: The League of Minnesota Foot Scooters Cities opposes legislation that would further relax the ban on the sale and use Issue: Current state statute (Minn. Stat. § of consumer fireworks. The League 169.225)regulates the operation of supports a repeal of the 2002 law that motorized foot scooters and treats motorized relaxes the ban on the sale and use of foot scooters similar to bicycles in terms of consumer fireworks. rights and duties. By statutory definition (Minn. Stat. § 169.011, subd. 46), motorized Fees are needed to cover the costs foot scooters must be powered by an engine associated with compliance checks, or motor that is limited to a maximum speed education, and inspections relating to the of 15 miles per hour. The law provides that sale of a regulated product. The current an operator must be 12 years of age or older. fee caps do not allow cities to recover Although the law contains safety provisions, these costs. The League supports allowing including a requirement that operators under cities to establish and impose reasonable the age of 18 must wear helmets, it does not fees on retailers that sell fireworks. The require training or permits for operators of League opposes restrictions on requiring any age. fireworks retailers to purchase additional liability insurance. Finally,the League Motorized foot scooters that are part of seeks repeal of the NFPA reference. organized sharing or rental businesses rely on the ability to park in the public right-of- SD-50. Traffic Enforcement way, especially on public sidewalks, to Cameras facilitate customer access and vending. Cities have express authority to regulate Issue: Drivers who disobey traffic laws can parking on city streets and sidewalks. Local cause serious traffic accidents and contribute government units should also have clear to gridlock. In spite of the severity of this authority to regulate or proscribe problem, cities cannot always afford the unauthorized use of city right-of-way for levels of peace officer enforcement that motorized foot scooter parking, to require a residents demand. The technology exists to permit or license for each scooter or sharing enforce traffic laws with photographic 50 company, and to include terms and Response: The League of Minnesota conditions dictated by the granting authority. Cities supports legislation making it unlawful for a scrap metal dealer to In order to protect public health, safety and purchase a catalytic converter from any welfare, it is important that cities have clear person other than a bona fide automobile authority to regulate motorized foot scooter recycling facility or a person who can parking and sharing options. provide evidence of legitimate removal. The League also supports making it a Response: State law should support the crime to be in possession of one or more ability of local governments to regulate or catalytic converters that do not belong to proscribe unauthorized use of city right- a vehicle or vehicles owned by the of-way for motorized foot scooter individual in possession of the catalytic parking,to require a permit or license converter(s), or that the individual cannot authorizing motorized foot scooter provide verification of legal receipt of the parking or sharing in the public right-of- catalytic converter from the vehicle way, and to impose terms, conditions, and owner. local rules on businesses seeking such a permit or license. SD-53. Drug Courts SD-52. Catalytic Converter Theft Issue: The League of Minnesota Cities recognizes the impact of substance abuse on Issue: Cities across Minnesota have seen individuals, communities and taxpayers. increases in the theft of catalytic converters, According to the National Council on a part of a vehicle's exhaust system that Alcoholism and Drug Dependence, the converts some pollutants into less harmful relationship between alcohol and drugs and gasses. Removal of a catalytic converter crimes--including domestic abuse and causes extensive damage to a vehicle. violence,underage drinking, robbery, Criminals remove catalytic converters from assault and sexual assault--is clearly parked automobiles and profit by selling documented. The National Center on them to scrap metal dealers. Preventing Addiction and Substance Abuse reports 65 catalytic converter theft is difficult because percent of the nation's inmates meet certain it is not illegal for an individual to possess medical criteria for substance abuse and multiple catalytic converters, nor is it illegal addiction, but only 11 percent received for scrap metal dealers to purchase catalytic treatment for their addictions. converters from individuals. Drug courts are an effective problem- In 2021 the Legislature established a solving approach for dealing with alcohol catalytic converter theft prevention pilot and other drug addicted offenders in the program. It provided funding for law judicial system. Drug courts closely enforcement agencies to offer vehicle monitor the defendant's progress toward owners the opportunity to have their sobriety and recovery through ongoing catalytic converters permanently marked treatment, frequent drug testing, regular with identifiers. Although the pilot program mandatory check-in court appearances, and has deterred some catalytic converter theft, the use of a range of immediate sanctions it has not proven to be a solution to the and incentives to foster behavior change. problem. 51 In drug court,judges collaborate with other Minnesota does not. Federal law and the law traditional court participants (prosecutors, of half the states immediately around defense counsel, treatment providers, Minnesota explicitly ban sales of drug probation officers, law enforcement, paraphernalia, but Minnesota does not. The educational and vocational experts, current state of the law arguably makes drug community leaders and others), whose roles paraphernalia easier to obtain in Minnesota have been substantially modified, but not than in the states immediately surrounding relinquished, in the interest of helping it. defendants deal with addiction. Response: The League of Minnesota Response: The League of Minnesota Cities supports strengthening the current Cities supports the efforts of drug courts statutory prohibition on drug to address substance abuse and reduce paraphernalia,including improving the crime. The League supports funding for statutory definition of"drug additional drug courts. paraphernalia" and explicitly prohibiting sales. SD-54. Drug Paraphernalia SD-55. Regulation of Massage Issue: Cities throughout the state struggle Therapists with local businesses selling items primarily designed to enable illegal drug use. Current Issue: The state does not currently license state law only prohibits use,possession, nor register massage therapists. Minn. Stat. delivery, and advertisements of drug ch. 146A is the Complementary and paraphernalia. The law inadequately defines Alternative Health Care Practices Act which the term "drug paraphernalia," and leaves identifies prohibited provider conduct and cities to pass more effective ordinances authorizes the Minnesota Department of "prohibiting or otherwise regulating the Health to take disciplinary action against manufacture, delivery,possession, or noncompliant providers who are not advertisement of drug paraphernalia." registered or licensed by a health-related licensing board. The office has authority to Many cities have adopted their own respond to allegations of prohibited behavior ordinances to regulate drug paraphernalia, through an investigatory process but this including specifically prohibiting sales. But function is triggered mainly by consumer for a variety of reasons, business owners complaints and there is no requirement that routinely challenge these ordinances as the office take any action. Additionally, unconstitutional and then successfully resources for these purposes have been invoke virulent public outcry on that basis. severely limited. This experience—along with costly court challenges—discourages other cities from In absence of any required statewide taking similar steps to curb illegal drug standards or regulation, several cities have activity, and leaves most cities only able to entered the traditional state domain of enforce an inadequate state law. health-care licensure by enacting ordinances that require all massage therapists to obtain Most states immediately around Minnesota a local professional license and many cities define "drug paraphernalia" in a detailed have also required bricks and mortar way based on a 1979 model federal law establishments to obtain a business license. designed to avoid constitutional issues. These ordinances help local law 52 enforcement officers to differentiate allowing local law enforcement between legitimate providers and businesses agencies access to national criminal engaged in sex trafficking and prostitution history databases. as well as provide for health and sanitation standards. b) Prevents individuals from conducting criminal activities such as prostitution City staff and law enforcement have spent and sex trafficking out of much time and resources conducting establishments operating as massage statewide criminal background checks; therapy facilities. investigating massage therapist accreditation programs to determine legitimacy and c) Improves provider compliance with credibility; and inspecting and monitoring Minn. Stat. ch. 146A and requires the establishments due to citizen complaints and state to take action in response to concerns. This has resulted in different noncompliance. procedures, requirements and fee structures across the state. Despite the thorough work d) Protects the public from injury and of city staff and law enforcement, when an from other conditions that may result illegitimate business suspects investigation, in harm. it will often close down and re-open in a different city. Without any sort of statewide SD-56. Regulation of Cannabinoid database of these businesses, one city's Products solution may become another city's problem. Issue:As legalization of cannabis and cannabinoid products has become more Additionally, local law enforcement prevalent in states across the country, the agencies do not have access to national Minnesota legislature has discussed criminal history data. This has allowed those legalization and potential regulatory with criminal convictions in other states framework. In 2022, the legislature passed related to sex trafficking and prostitution to legislation that authorized the sale of certain obtain massage therapy business and/or edibles and beverages infused with professional licenses in cities in Minnesota. tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) extracted from Allowing access to this information could hemp. The legislation provided limited help cities prevent sex trafficking across regulation of these products in Minn. Stat. § state lines. 151.72 under the Board of Pharmacy, including restrictions and requirements on Response: The League of Minnesota packaging, labeling, amount of THC, and Cities supports the statewide registration sale of these products to those under the age or licensure of massage therapists that of 21. would not pre-empt the ability of cities to regulate massage therapy establishments. Cities were not consulted during the drafting The League also supports legislation of this legislation but have local concerns pertaining to the practice of massage that need to be addressed. Though the new therapy that accomplishes the following: law has some regulations on the products, there are significant gaps in state oversight a) Helps cities establish legitimacy of and accountability of the manufacturing and providers and businesses applying for production, testing, and distribution of the a local license to practice,including products. Additionally, the law does not 53 provide any restrictions on where the manufacturing, and distributing to products can be sold and offers no guidance retailers of cannabinoid products. for local governments to regulate the sale of the products. The new law increases b) Rigorous testing requirements similar enforcement responsibilities for local to what is required under Minn. Stat. governments which will result in additional § 152.29 for the medical cannabis costs for cities. program. Lacking significant oversight and c) Reporting and enforcement structure regulations at the state level, some cities for local law enforcement to report to passed licensing and/or zoning regulations the state, including penalties for non- over the products. Though the law does not compliance. prohibit local regulation, many outstanding questions remain pertaining to law d) Reporting and enforcement structure enforcement, employment, and the state-city for local governments to address odor dynamic of regulating and enforcing the law issues from processing plants. related to these newly legal products. Cities should maintain the authority for: There are also outstanding questions for cities as employers. The legal status of the a) Local licenses for sellers with a state new products creates challenges with database of licenses. existing drug-testing law and abilities. Drug b) Local zoning regulations. tests can test for THC; however, they cannot differentiate whether a positive test for THC c) Local authority to enact restrictions is the result of a legal THC edible product or or regulations regarding the sale of an illegal cannabinoid. Additionally, unlike the products more stringent than the alcohol intoxication, there are no current state, including the authority to opt- tests to indicate intoxication or impairment out from authorizing the sale of the levels from THC consumption for products. employees who may be showing signs of intoxication. Public safety needs to be addressed: Response:As the legislature addresses a) State law should prohibit the future issues related to cannabinoids possession of cannabinoid products cities must be included in the discussion for those under 21, acknowledging the and regulatory framework of these adverse effects of criminal penalties products. The League supports a strong for youth. regulatory framework with consideration to public safety,taxation, employment, b) Ongoing state resources and training and public health. for law enforcement to address costs of public safety concerns such as A strong state regulatory framework is increased staff for monitoring retailer needed,including: compliance of state and local regulations and security. a) A state regulatory framework with clear licensing,inspection, and c) As technology becomes available for enforcement for the cultivation, product testing, the state should 54 provide resources to local law testing for the purpose of determining enforcement for testing retail products the presence or absence of cannabis as to ensure compliance. a condition of employment for peace officer and/or firefighter positions. The unfunded enforcement mandate and lack of taxation needs to be addressed: The state should consider public health concerns: a) Knowing that local law enforcement will need to spend a significant a) The state should create and fund amount of time and resources in public health campaigns for education enforcing cannabinoid products, the on the impacts of the products, state must fund this mandate. training for retailers, safe use education, and adolescent use b) Local jurisdictions should be prevention. authorized to impose a local impact tax at their discretion with broad SD-57. Lawful Gambling and Local flexibility on the ability to use Control revenue. Issue:As part of the 2009 reforms to lawful Unique employment concerns need to be gambling statutes, some local control was addressed: removed from the lawful gambling process. a) Minnesota and Federal law should Previously, the lawful gambling licensee clarify the duty and obligations of would have to obtain the city council's restricted employees, such as CDL approval as part of its application to renew holders and firearm-holding the organizations premises permit(some employees, as they relate to off-duty forms of lawful gambling require obtaining consumption of legal cannabis an organizational license and a premises products. permit(s) from the state). This step was removed when the state established a b) The legislature should clarify Minn. perpetual organizational license and Stat. § 181.953 subd. 10, Minnesota's premises permitting system. Because these Drug and Alcohol Testing in the licenses and permits are issued by the state, Workplace Act(DATWA), regarding under the current system a city's authority how the requirement for employers to over these licensees is limited to: 1) give an employee who tests positive approval of the initial premises permit; and the opportunity to participate in 2) enforcement of the city's lawful gambling either a drug or alcohol counseling or ordinance. Some city officials have rehab after consultation with a concerns that gambling organizations will be certified chemical use counselor more apt to ignore local regulations (such as applies to the new edible THC spending the required percentage of lawful products. gambling expenditures in the city's trade area) if they don't need the city's approval c) The legislature should clarify that an for the renewal of their state-issued premises employer is allowed to require an permits. employee or applicant undergo cannabis testing or drug and alcohol Response: The licensee should be required to obtain local approval on an annual 55 basis, or at longer intervals as determined SD-59. On-Sale Liquor or Wine by the city, and file the resolution of local Licenses approval with the Gambling Control Board. Issue: Minn. Stat. § 340A.404 defines the establishments to which a city may issue an SD-58. Liquor Liability Insurance on-sale intoxicating liquor license. Every Limits year cities see local businesses and organizations with innovative models for Issue: Minn. Stat. § 340A.409 requires that event centers, food halls, arenas, boutiques, "no retail license may be issued, maintained museums, art spaces, and cultural or or renewed unless the applicant community centers that are not clearly demonstrates proof of financial named in this statute but would like to responsibility with regard to liability obtain a liquor license. Several cities have imposed by Minn. Stat. § 340A.801" received special legislation allowing their relating to the sale of alcoholic beverages. municipalities to issue on-sale liquor or wine The minimum limits of liability currently in licenses to these types of entities. However, statute require $50,000 of coverage because this process interferes with the ability of of bodily injury to any one person in any municipalities to respond expeditiously to one occurrence, $100,000 because of bodily innovative business models, control the injury to two or more persons in any one placement and operating manner of these occurrence, $10,000 because of injury to or entities, and limits municipalities from destruction of property of others in any one providing licenses for businesses that would occurrence, $50,000 for loss of means of generate local tourism and revenue. support of any one person in any one occurrence, $100,000 for loss of means of Response: The Legislature should support of two or more persons in any one modernize and expand the list of occurrence, $50,000 for other pecuniary loss establishments in Minn. Stat. § 340A.404 of any one person in any one occurrence, to which municipalities are authorized to and$100,000 for other pecuniary loss of two issue on-sale liquor or wine licenses, or more persons in any one occurrence. subject to restrictions imposed by the These limits have not been updated since at municipality,to allow for innovative least 1985 and would provide very little business models and economic relief to persons impacted by an intoxicated development within their jurisdiction. person. While cities can choose to require higher limits of liability than required by SD-60. Liquor Licensing of Non- statute, it may create competitive imbalance Contiguous Spaces between communities if the limits are not consistent. Issue: During the COVID-19 outbreak, restaurants and bars were able to open at Response: The minimum limits in Minn. limited capacity for in-person service with Stat. § 340A.409 should be increased to spacing requirements between tables both $500,000 per occurrence with a $500,000 inside and outside. To provide opportunities annual aggregate. for businesses to open and serve the public, many cities allowed for non-contiguous spacing of tables outside despite requirements outlined in Minn. Stat. § 56 340A.410, subd 7. This allowed customers Response: The Legislature should remove to go to restaurants and bars and remain the requirement of approval by the outside, which had been deemed preferable commissioner for city-issued liquor to dining indoors in mitigating the risk of licenses and simply require cities to notify exposure to the virus. This model proved to the state of newly issued and renewed be successful for many businesses and licenses as is already the case for enjoyed by residents. Cities would like to intoxicating on-sale liquor licenses and all respond to customer and business 3.2-liquor licenses. If the state requires an expectations and continue being authorized inspection to certify an on-sale wine to issue licenses to non-contiguous spaces. license, this should be delegated to either the city or county to be conducted at the Response: The increased flexibility during same time as other inspections. This will the COVID-19 pandemic allowed expedite the process for both the state and businesses and cities to partner in the business. response to the pandemic and city residents have enjoyed increased seating SD-62. Youth Access to Alcohol and options. The League of Minnesota Cities Tobacco supports amending Minn. Stat. § 340A.410 to allow for licensing of spaces Issue: To promote public safety and public that are not compact and contiguous health, cities have an interest in preventing during and after the pandemic. youth from obtaining alcohol and tobacco. For example, the Minnesota Department of SD-61. Wine and Off-Sale Licenses Health reports that 80 percent of adult smokers had their first cigarette before the Issue: Minn. Stat. ch. 340A authorizes cities age of 18; reducing youth tobacco use may to issue liquor licenses to various help prevent adverse impacts of tobacco in establishments within their jurisdictions,but the future. To this end, many cities operate in virtually all cases, the license issued by compliance check programs in an effort to the city is not valid until the state approves discern the current level of youth access and it. This is true for such commonly issued to reduce youth access. Statewide, a number licenses as wine, off-sale intoxicating liquor of cities have created community and temporary on-sale intoxicating liquor partnerships with their court systems, local licenses. The result is extra time spent for businesses, and school districts to quickly city staff, as well as a time-based address problems associated with youth commercial impact to the business pursuing access to alcohol and tobacco. the original license. Response: The League of Minnesota Additionally, if a business applies for an on- Cities opposes any proposal that could sale wine license, the state may choose to result in increased risks of youth access to conduct an inspection of the business further alcohol and tobacco products and delaying approval of the license and full supports statutory changes that assist in operation of the establishment. This reducing youth access to alcohol and inspection is often in addition to a city tobacco products. The League supports certificate of occupancy inspection and a locally-determined alcohol compliance county health inspection. check programs, but any state mandate for alcohol compliance checks should come with state-supported funding 57 initiatives to support these locally- SD-64. Regulation of Mobile determined compliance efforts. The Businesses Legislature should consider a grant program supporting locally-based Issue: The transient nature of mobile community partnerships that can quickly businesses presents unique challenges to and effectively respond to youth access traditional city zoning and permitting and problems. may create an unfair competitive advantage over traditional businesses that pay property SD-63. Consumer Small Loans taxes and generate income for a city. Cities also make significant investments in the Issue: Consumer small loans, also known as development of retail districts and "payday loans," are short-term cash loans downtowns and have a strong interest in based on the borrower's personal check held maintaining a level playing field for brick for future deposit or on electronic access to and mortar establishments. the borrower's bank account. Borrowers write a personal check for the amount Minnesota has seen a sharp increase in the borrowed plus the finance charge and number of food trucks (Mobile Food Units) receive cash. In some cases,borrowers sign operating throughout the state. Food trucks over electronic access to their bank accounts are licensed as food and beverage service to receive and repay payday loans. Lenders establishments by the Minnesota hold the checks until the borrower's next Department of Health(MDH) or by local payday when loans and the finance charge jurisdictions pursuant to an MDH delegation must be paid in one lump sum. agreement. Food trucks are prohibited from operating in the same location for more than Consumer small loans are typically 21 days without approval of the regulatory predatory in nature. According to Debt.org, authority. an organization dedicated to helping consumers understand and overcome debt, In 2015, the Legislature authorized the predatory lenders typically target minorities, Board of Cosmetologist Examiners to adopt the poor, the elderly and the less educated. rules governing the licensure, operation and They also prey on people who need inspection of"Mobile Salons"which are immediate cash for emergencies such as operated in a mobile vehicle or mobile paying medical bills, making a home repair structure for exclusive use to offer personal or car payment. These lenders also target services defined in Minn. Stat. § 155A.23, borrowers that do not qualify for subd. 3. The rules must prohibit mobile conventional loans or lines of credit due to salons from violating reasonable municipal credit problems or unemployment. restrictions on time and place of operation of a mobile salon within its jurisdiction, and Response: The League of Minnesota shall establish penalties,up to and including Cities seeks statewide legislation that revocation of a license, for repeated would protect consumer small loan violations of municipal laws. borrowers against predatory lending practices. Also, cities should have explicit Response: It is appropriate for mobile authority to regulate consumer small loan businesses to be licensed by the state or its conditions including the ability to cap designees in the same manner as non- finance charges and interest rates. mobile business establishments. Such state regulation must not preempt the 58 ability of local governments to enact Party buses and boats-for-hire are reasonable time and place restrictions on sometimes chartered for celebrations such as the operation of mobile businesses within weddings, proms, bachelor and bachelorette their jurisdictions. parties, birthdays and tours. Party buses are also popular for round trips to casinos and SD-65. Regulation of Party Buses sporting events, and personalized drop-offs and Boats-for-Hire and pick-ups at various bars and nightclubs. Additionally, both party buses and boats-for- Issue:A party bus (also known as a party hire have become popular settings for adult ride, limo bus, limousine bus, party van, or entertainment. luxury bus) is a large motor vehicle usually derived from a conventional (school)bus or Cities have seen a sharp increase in the coach,but modified and designed to carry 8 number of party buses and boats-for-hire or more people for recreational purposes. In being used as venues for illegal activities Minnesota, these vehicles are regulated by such as underage drinking, drug use and sex default under Minn. Stat. ch. 221 (the trafficking. The transient nature of party chapter of law dealing with motor carriers) buses and boats-for-hire presents unique and registered by the Minnesota Dept. of challenges to traditional city zoning, Transportation's (MnDOT's) Office of permitting and law enforcement. While state Freight and Commercial Vehicle laws regulate requirements for the operation Operations. The regulations require of party buses and boats-for-hire, the law is operators to carry commercial insurance, silent on enforcement,penalties, inspection have an annual vehicle inspection and be and liability related to illegal activities that registered with the state. Party bus drivers occur in party buses and on boats-for-hire. are required to hold a current commercial driver's license (CDL) issued through the Response: The League of Minnesota Minnesota Dept. of Public Safety's Driver Cities supports changes to state statutes and Vehicle Services Division. that would help reduce criminal activities taking place on party buses and boats- A boat-for-hire is a watercraft used by for-hire. Specifically, the League owners and operators to carry passengers for supports: hire. Minn. Stat. § 326B.94 and Minn. Rules 5225.6000 through 5225.7200 govern the a) Creation of statutory definitions of requirements of boat owners and operators "party bus" and "boat-for-hire" that carrying passengers for hire on Minnesota's contain permissible uses of the inland waters. These vessels must have a vehicles; permit to carry passengers for hire. They must have an annual safety inspection and a b) Prohibition on offering or allowing dry-dock inspection performed by "adult entertainment" as defined by Minnesota Department of Labor and Minn. Stat. § 617.242, "sexual Industry boiler inspection personnel once conduct as defined by Minn. Stat. § every three years (or annually if the hull is 617.241, or"nudity" as defined by made of wood). The vessels must also be Minn. Stat. § 617.292, subd. 3, on operated by a licensed master and must party buses and boats-for-hire; follow all Minnesota Dept. of Natural c) Explicit authority for peace officers to Resources' boating and water recreation investigate suspicious activities on regulations. 59 party buses and boats-for-hire and to b) Regulatory bodies fail to consistently cite individuals on board who are use the best science available and the involved in illegal activities; and most current and accurate data when establishing water quality standards. d) Requiring the appropriate authority to utilize existing authority to impose c) Regulatory bodies impose new permit fines, or to deny, suspend, or revoke requirements without going through permits or registration certificates rulemaking. Instead, the agencies rely on held by operators found to have adult internal documents, program strategies, entertainment, drug, or underage and"best professional judgment of staff' consumption violations. when setting permit criteria. SD-66. Environmental Protection d) Regulatory bodies approve permits and programs that compete with traditional Issue: Cities demonstrate strong stewardship municipal services and encourage urban for the protection and preservation of the sprawl. This behavior puts at risk the environment. Minnesota municipalities have public investments and growth historically been the leading funding source management efforts cities have made for environmental protection and when planning for future development. improvements. Municipal efforts include environmental protection through e) Permit fees and other cost-transfer wastewater treatment, wetland restorations, elements of federal and state programs stormwater treatment,public utility emission do not provide an incentive for reductions, brownfield cleanup, safe environmental agency efficiency,policy drinking water programs, as well as others. prioritization or risk assessment. Additionally, all residents of the state At some point, however, the diminishing or contribute to the need for wastewater, nonexistent environmental benefit received drinking water, and stormwater from additional efforts is fiscally treatment and benefit from the resulting irresponsible. The programs are often improved water quality. These factors improperly designed to meet their stated make the state general fund an goals. Additionally, the absence of funding appropriate source for significant by the state and federal government has portions of state water program funding. removed an essential restraining feature in program design and implementation. f) Third-party environmental advocacy Agencies are less accountable to the groups create significant hardships on governments that mandate environmental cities by threatening litigation even programs when they do not have to find the when the best science available may not money to implement the programs. support the groups' positions. Specific problems faced by cities include: g) Cities are often required to pay the cost of removing problem materials from the a) New programs or standards are waste stream, rather than preventing the continually adopted without regard to problem at the consumer product or the existence, attainability or cost of manufacturing level. existing programs and standards. 60 Response: Alternative wastewater requirements only when the criteria they treatment and cooperative service systems are using is developed through the rule- should be prohibited from operating in making process. areas that can reasonably and effectively be served by existing municipal systems, State agencies need to develop science- unless: based standards and quantify new effluent standards, ensuring that they are a) The municipal system is proven to be scientifically and economically substantially less cost-effective and practicable. State and federal agencies substantially less beneficial to the should coordinate and integrate their environment; and monitoring data to assure that all pertinent data is available and utilized. b) The operation of these systems will not create a stranded public investment in The state general fund is an appropriate the existing system. source for state water program funding. Municipal water permit fees should only Sufficient state and federal financial be increased if new revenue is needed assistance should be provided to local because of increased costs of processing governments when complying with state municipal water permits or if the funds and federal infrastructure requirements, would go for specific scientific research, particularly with regard to wastewater, technical and financial support for cities, stormwater, and drinking water facilities. or agency staffing needed by cities to address environmental and public health The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency concerns, not as a means to generate new (MPCA) should streamline its permitting revenue to cover other budget shortfalls. and re-issuing processes to allow for effluent standards and permit Additionally, the Legislature should requirements to be known earlier, create effective, producer-led reduction, thereby giving communities more time to reuse, and recycling programs to deal defend against contested case hearings. with a product's lifecycle impacts from design through end-of-life management The Legislature should require the and should regulate products and MPCA to make its determination compounds that damage water quality, regarding permit-required submittals, sewer collection, stormwater or permit modifications, and the reissuance wastewater treatment systems at the of a permit within a reasonable set time consumer and manufacturing levels, not period, and require the MPCA to make just at the treatment and infrastructure its determinations and reissue the permit maintenance level. Examples include within that reasonable set time frame. requiring accurate labeling as to whether disposable wipes can be safely flushed The state should ensure townships are and creating incentives for private salt required to meet the same environmental applicators to reduce the volume of salt protection and regulatory requirements theyapply. as cities. Legislation should be passed that requires state agencies to establish permit 61 SD-67. Impaired Waters b) Support legislative appropriation of constitutionally dedicated clean water Issue: Despite the billions of dollars that revenues that will supplement Minnesota municipalities have invested and traditional sources of funding for continue to invest in wastewater and these purposes, not be used to cover stormwater management systems, and best budget cuts, backfill past program management practices to protect,preserve, reductions, or to otherwise supplant and restore the quality of Minnesota's normal state spending on water surface waters, the quality of some of programs; Minnesota's surface waters does not meet federal water quality requirements. The c) Direct the majority of funds collected federal Clean Water Act requires that further by the state for impaired waters into efforts be made by the state to reduce human programs that fund municipal impacts on surface waters that are wastewater and stormwater projects, determined to be impaired due to high and for state programs needed for pollutant loads of nutrients, bacteria, municipal wastewater and stormwater sediment, mercury, and other contaminants. permitting and technical support, Scientific studies of these waters must be including the Clean Water Revolving conducted to determine how much pollution Loan Fund,Wastewater they can handle (Total Maximum Daily Infrastructure Fund, TMDL Grants Loads, or TMDLs). The pollutant load Program, Small Community reduction requirements will affect Wastewater Treatment Grant and municipal, industrial, and agricultural Loan Program, and other state practices and operations along any river, programs that provide financial stream or lake determined to be impaired. resources for city wastewater While the sources of 86 percent of the treatment facilities, septic tank pollutants affecting Minnesota waters are replacement, stormwater management non-point sources, there will also be new projects, and other city water quality costs and requirements for point-source improvement and protection projects; dischargers, like municipal wastewater treatment facilities. Municipal stormwater d) More adequately cover the current systems will also face increased protective five-year wastewater infrastructure requirements and regulation as part of the funding need projection of more than state's impaired waters program. $1.65 billion; Response: The League of Minnesota e) Recognize and address the upcoming Cities will work actively with the costs of stormwater management administration,the Legislature, and other infrastructure and operation on stakeholders in the design and municipalities from new regulatory implementation of Minnesota's impaired mandates and load reduction waters program to: requirements; a) Ensure equitable funding solutions 0Allow flexibility in achieving pollutant are found, such as the state general load reductions and limitations fund or bonding,that broadly collect through offsets or trading of pollutant revenue to address this statewide load reduction credits for both point problem; 62 and non-point load reduction responsibility to providing safe, reliable, requirements within watersheds; affordable water to their residents in a sustainable manner. That is an essential g) Recognize and credit the work element in assuring a healthy and stable underway and already completed by future for public health, the environment, local units of government to limit and economic development. As a result, point and non-point source water municipal water suppliers have collected pollutant discharges; some of the most current and accurate information available on local water h) Recognize the diversity of efforts and conditions. needs that exists across the state; The state requires extensive planning and i) Ensure the best science available is permitting processes for municipal water used to accurately determine the suppliers to document that their systems are sources of pollutant load in order to drawing water at sustainable levels, that the maximize positive environmental water is safe for human consumption, that outcomes and minimize unnecessary they have land use controls in place to regulatory and financial burdens for protect public water supplies from cities by correctly accounting for and contamination, that adequate plans exist for addressing agricultural and other emergency and high demand situations, and non-point pollutant sources; that rate structures meet state statutory requirements. Those systems are constantly j) Ensure the state requires that the becoming more technologically, MPCA retain control of the TMDL environmentally, and economically efficient. development process and that all City water suppliers have invested many scientific research related to TMDLs billions of dollars to develop their utility is conducted by the MPCA or systems and infrastructure in a manner that qualified, objective parties pursuant meets those criteria. to state contracting,procurement, and conflict of interest laws; and Demand and supply sides of this issue are being addressed throughout the state. Cities k) Clarify state water quality mandates have established educational programs, so cities know specifically what they incentives, and local water use restrictions to are required to do and what methods further improve water conservation efforts, of achieving those outcomes are while appliances and plumbing fixtures are acceptable to state and federal becoming more efficient in their water use. regulators. Furthermore, stormwater is being infiltrated SD-68. Municipal Public Water into the ground at unprecedented levels as part of municipal stormwater permit Supplies requirements and is being redirected for irrigation purposes in some cities. Issue: Essential residential water supplies provided by public water supply systems are Despite those efforts, there are places in the classified as the highest priority for the use state where monitoring data indicates that of public water under Minn. Stat. water may be being used faster than the §103G.261. Minnesota cities spend supply can sustain, particularly in the case of significant resources meeting their underground aquifers. These issues are very 63 complex, however, and causes and effects essential residential water use is the are not always easily documented or highest preferred use of public water understood. City water supplies are not the supplies. only users of that water, either. Industries, smaller private wells, agricultural Finally, in cases where sound operations, irrigation systems, and management of water resources will contamination containment and treatment require substantial modifications in can all be major drains on local water public water systems that were previously supplies. determined to be adequate, the state needs to be a partner in developing cost- Hard facts and sound science need to be effective solutions and in providing the used to determine the best courses of action technical and financial resources to make to assure that safe, reliable, affordable water those changes to prevent communities supplies are available to future Minnesotans. from being economically uncompetitive. Those approaches will vary considerably depending on local water and soil SD-69. Municipal Electric Utilities conditions, the types and sizes of users, and the quantity and quality of available water. Issue: Municipal electric utilities provide They also need to be coordinated between essential community services to many the many state entities that play a role in Minnesota cities. The League of Minnesota water management and regulations so that Cities works closely with the Minnesota scarce local resources are not wasted and Municipal Utilities Association(MMUA)to efforts are not counterproductive to other identify issues of concern and to support priority environmental and public health their legislative and administrative efforts to results. address them. Response: The state should lead the How those entities are regulated by the state, development of sound scientific how their service territory is defined and information on water supply, aquifer amended, how their very limited customer recharge, and groundwater availability base is protected, and how they are treated and quality, making good use of the in relation to other types of electric utilities existing studies, data, and staff expertise is important to them remaining affordable, of municipal water suppliers. efficient, and effective. The state should also be working to Currently, the legislative proposals have remove barriers to water re-use, aquifer been made to allow unregulated third-party recharge, encouraging cultural changes in electricity sales from generators directly to water use practices, applying technology the customer, circumventing long- for smart water use, exploring impacts established consumer protections. In some and creative mitigation options at cases, municipal utilities would be required contaminated sites, on ways to incent and to "wheel" energy from third parties across enable alternate uses of stormwater, and their power lines to retail customers in ways to make sure that all water users violation of the utility's exclusive service play a role in ensuring that water supplies area rights. are being managed in a manner that is sustainable for future residents. Those Another way to arrange third-party sales is solutions need to keep in mind that by selling electricity from solar panels or 64 other generating equipment sited on a SD-70. State Support for Municipal consumer's own property to retail Energy Policy Goals customers, while maintaining ownership of those panels or equipment. The equipment Issue: The State of Minnesota has adopted owner would charge for electricity it an aggressive energy policy focusing on the provides, yet rely on the local utility to promotion of energy efficiency and the provide reliable service to the customer at expansion of renewable energy with the goal all other times. While such arrangements of achieving a reduction in carbon may seem convenient to an unregulated generation through reduced use of fossil third-party, they come at a significant cost to fuels. To meet state energy and greenhouse the utilities and subsequently, to the rate gas reduction goals, efforts at the city level payers of that utility. will be essential. That local work will generate significant economic benefits both Providing municipal reliable utility services in communities where it is done and more comes with certain unavoidable expenses broadly, as industries and professional such as electric generation,power lines, contractors expand their services throughout poles, and substations. These types of fixed the state. costs are on-going and should be equitably shared by the local customers. However, Minnesota cities share this goal, as both current and previously proposed demonstrated by over 140 cities voluntarily changes to state law would give third-party participating in the GreenStep Cities providers an advantage subsidized by the program. However, already strained budgets remaining rate payers and/or taxpayer. and reserves at the state and local level have limited the ability of the state to assist local Response: The legislature should support units of government in furthering specific and maintain the current regulatory projects that support the overall state goal. compact, and recognize the value of the In addition, institutional knowledge and dependable services provided by capacity of most cities limits their ability to municipal utilities, and the fact that explore energy efficiency or renewable municipal utilities are accountable energy projects, even projects whose energy directly to the citizens. Further,the "payback" could finance project capital legislature should reject giving third- costs. party providers any advantage over municipal utilities, as well as any other As the role cities are playing in reducing effort to de-regulate utilities. energy use and developing renewable energy generation expands, how those Additionally, current state practice is for efforts are affected by electric utility the Department of Commerce and Public practices also becomes more important. Utility Commission to require payment of Utility billing is not consistent between quarterly fees on municipal utilities to the electric utilities, with many using different Department of Commerce three quarters rate categories, significantly complicating in advance. The state should bill for those B3 benchmarking reporting and billing fees only for the upcoming quarter. transparency. For projects on which a utility provides capital, the length of time over which city projects are amortized can also be extended to the point that energy cost savings are eliminated, even with substantial 65 demand reductions. The application of h) Support development of a unified demand and peak demand rates in electric energy billing and usage repayment schedules can also reduce or structure that is easily imported into a eliminate energy cost savings. B3 Benchmarking tracking system; Response: The League of Minnesota i) Develop a framework that allows Cities calls on our legislators and state Property Assessed Clean Energy executive agencies charged with Programs; accomplishing the state's energy policy goals to assist cities, townships and j) Play an increased role in providing a counties with tailored efforts to identify comprehensive network of charging appropriate energy efficiency and stations to support a transition to renewable energy projects for electric vehicles and equitable access undertaking at the local level. Among to charging stations; those tools, the state should: k) Create a grant and loan program to a) Provide grants to support the offset start-up capital expenses for development of local climate action projects identified where the savings and adaptation plans and tie those in energy costs can offset capital plans to funding made available to project costs or where projects are implement them; needed to meet energy policy goals; b) Where possible, build on existing 1) Clarify state law so that cities may use assistance and incentive programs to public utility franchise agreements to limit duplication of effort,improve advance energy policy goals, and; efficiency, and minimize new tracking and reporting requirements; m) Recognize that for the state to meet its goals, hands-on state energy agency c) Help ensure that reduced energy use technical expertise needs to be made results in reduced energy costs by available to cities at no cost. addressing problems with amortization timing; SD-71. Urban Forest Management Funding d) Have laws that allow and support utility grant and loan programs; Issue:Urban forests are an essential part of city infrastructure. Dutch elm disease, oak e) Create a grant program to assist in wilt disease, drought, storms, and emerald covering local capital costs to install ash borer threaten our investment in trees. solar energy systems on public The costs for control and removal can be buildings; catastrophic and put pressure on city budgets. The Minnesota Department of f) Use proceeds from the Renewable Natural Resources, through its Urban and Development Fund to support local Community Forestry program, and the government projects; Minnesota Department of Agriculture, g) Provide increased flexibility for through its Shade Tree and Invasive Species utilities to work with local program, currently have regulatory authority government; to direct tree sanitation and control 66 programs. Although these programs allow application. With many cities working to for addressing some tree disease, pest, and increase pollinator-friendly habitat and other problems, funding levels have been reduce the impact of pesticide usage known inadequate to meet the need of cities to build to be lethal to pollinators, cities are seeking capacity for urban tree programs and further tools to meet those public respond to catastrophic problems. Cities expectations. With small lot sizes, primarily share the goal of the state's Releaf non-agricultural property uses, and dense Program—promoting and funding the residential concentrations, cities often find inventory, planning, planting, maintenance, that the broader state pesticide regulations and improvement of trees in cities are not adequately protective of pollinators throughout the state. In addition, economic and are seeking additional state authority to gains for stormwater management, tourism, address these issues in their communities. recreation, and other benefits must be protected from tree loss. A lack of timely Response: The state legislature should investment in urban forests costs cities amend Minn. Stat. § 18B.09 to allow cities significantly more in the long run. to opt to restrict the application or use of pollinator-lethal pesticides within their Further, more and more cities are facing community and require the Minnesota immediate costs for the identification, Department of Agriculture to maintain a removal, replacement, and treatment of list of which pesticides include pollinator emerald ash borer(EAB) as it spreads across protection boxes in their labeling or the state. The state has no program to assist precautionary pollinator or bee warnings cities in covering those expenses. in the environmental hazards section of their labeling. Response: The League of Minnesota Cities supports funding from the general SD-73. Election Issues fund or other appropriate state funds for a state matching grant program to assist Issue: Cities play an important role in cities with building capacity for urban administering state and federal election law forest management and meeting the costs and conducting voting activities. of preparing for, and responding to, catastrophic urban forest problems. Response: To strengthen the effectiveness of elections administration,the Specifically, direct grants to cities are Legislature should: desperately needed for the identification, removal, replacement, and treatment of a) Seek the input of cities, townships, trees related to management of EAB. The counties, and school districts on state should establish an ongoing grant proposed changes to voter program with at least$5 million per year registration, election law, and needed that is usable for those activities. improvements and updates to the Statewide Voter Registration System; SD-72. City Pesticide Application Authority b) Amend the timeline for candidate filings in cities without a primary so Issue: Current state law in Minn. Stat. § that the final day of filing is prior to 18B.09 limits city authority to an ordinance the August primary date and align the requiring warning signs after pesticide date when city and school district 67 ballot questions must be submitted to paper or electronic roster. Currently the county to match the close of electronic signatures are not allowed by state candidate filing; law; having the authority to use electronic signatures would make the process more c) Expedite court action to resolve efficient. Streamlining the voter check-in candidate eligibility related to procedures would increase efficiency and residency in errors and omissions decrease the time voters spend in line proceedings; and waiting to cast their absentee ballot. d) Eliminate redundant audio testing of Minn. Stat. § 203B.121, subd. 4 stipulates assistive voting technology and that at the close of business on the seventh equipment by election judges in day before Election Day, elections precinct polling places on Election administrators can begin processing Day; and absentee ballots received by mail and accepted. At the beginning of the seventh e) Support local governments with day before Election Day, in-person absentee funding to upgrade dated and aging voters can place their ballots directly into a elections equipment and provide tabulator(Minn. Stat. § 203B.081, subd. 3). accessibility measures at polling If a voter who has voted absentee prior to places. the seventh day before Election Day wishes to "claw back"their ballot and receive a new SD-74. Administering Absentee ballot, they are able to do so through the Balloting seventh day. Once direct balloting begins, a voter should no longer be able to "claw Issue: Eligible voters in Minnesota may back" a ballot. Additionally, opening vote by absentee ballot prior to Election absentee ballots that have been accepted Day. Starting 46 days before the election, a should begin at the beginning of the day on voter can request an application for an the seventh day before Election Day. absentee ballot and if approved, receive and cast an absentee ballot in one visit to For those who vote in-person absentee prior their county or city election offices. Ballots to the seven days before Election Day, there can also be requested, applied for and is confusion and in some cases, frustration received by mail and returned by the voter to that they are not allowed to place their the election office by 3:00 pm on Election ballots directly into a tabulator. To match Day or by 8:00 pm on Election Day if the voter experience to be the same as they delivered by mail or package delivery. would experience on election day and Absentee balloting results are not known respond to the voter demand to vote early, until combined with polling place results this time period should be increased from when the polls close on Election Day. seven to the full 46 days before Election Day. Additionally, a voter can request to For those voting absentee in-person, the place their ballot in a series of envelopes absentee ballot application process is similar to those returned by mail to be burdensome and confusing as voters expect processed after they have left the building. the same process they encounter in their Few, if any, voters request to place their polling place on Election Day. The ballot into envelopes. application process should be replaced by having the voter verify their identity on a 68 State law allows alternative sites for b) Amending state statute to allow conducting absentee balloting but requires elections administrators to begin that these sites remain open for the full 46 processing accepted absentee ballots days prior to Election Day. For some when direct balloting begins at the jurisdictions, staffing alternative sites for the beginning of the seventh day before full 46 days is not efficient as these sites Election Day and subsequently, may be underutilized until closer to Election concluding the "claw back" period at Day. Cities should be able to determine the the close of business the day before; length of time most appropriate for alternative sites to meet the voting demands c) Increasing the time period that an in- of their residents. As required by state law, person absentee voter can place their voters would maintain the ability to vote in- ballot directly into a tabulator from person absentee during the full 46-day seven to 46 days; period at city halls. d) Eliminating the option to place an in- Current law allows for in-person absentee person absentee ballot in a series of voting until 5:00 p.m. on the day before envelopes instead of a tabulator; Election Day. This does not leave adequate time for election officials to process e) Allowing alternative in-person absentee ballots,prepare supplemental lists absentee voting sites to be established indicating which voters have already cast for less than the full 46 days currently absentee ballots and deliver the lists to required by state law; precincts prior to opening of the polls on Election Day. The current absentee voting 0 Establishing an earlier deadline for process further requires that additional ending in-person absentee voting; supplemental lists of final absentee voters be g) Revising absentee ballot regulations to delivered to the polls after the last mail allow any person 18 and older to delivery on Election Day and often leads to witness the absentee process and sign administrative challenges and increased the envelope as a witness; and potential for errors in the process. As more and more voters choose to vote SD-75. Loss of Felon Voting Rights early with absentee balloting, improvements must be made to increase efficiency of Issue: There is confusion as to when voting administering absentee balloting before rights are restored to those convicted of a Election Day, reduce the potential for errors, felony, and notification of restoration is and to improve voter experience. inconsistent or nonexistent. This very often leads to challenges placed on Election Day Response: The League of Minnesota rosters for those convicted of a felony who Cities supports: are not eligible to vote and election judges must then challenge the voter and spend a) Removing the paper application time and resources determining a voter's requirement for in-person absentee eligibility. It would be much clearer if the voters and allow voters the option to loss of voting rights occurred only when a apply electronically; person is incarcerated. 69 Response: The League of Minnesota wish to have their write-in votes Cities opposes the loss of voting rights for individually recorded; and those convicted of a felony who serve the entirety of their sentence in the b) allow the city clerk to only compile community and are not incarcerated. If and report write-in votes for specific incarcerated,the League of Minnesota candidates if the total number of Cities supports the restoration of voting write-in votes for an office is greater rights to those convicted of a felony once than or equal to the number of votes they have completed their term of received by the candidate appearing incarceration. This will eliminate the on the ballot receiving the fewest administrative burden of challenging number of votes. voters at the polls and determining eligibility from various jurisdictions. This SD-77. Ranked Choice Voting will also eliminate the need for investigation by local law enforcement of Issue: Current law allows charter cities to those who have unknowingly registered to consider and adopt Ranked Choice Voting vote or voted before their rights were (RCV) as an alternative voting method in restored. local elections. State statute does not extend this authority to statutory cities. SD-76. Write-in Candidates in City Additionally, there are no statewide Elections standards for conducting RCV. The lack of consistent guidelines on how to effectively Issue: For federal, state and county offices, implement a RCV system imposes write-in candidates are totaled together as significant challenges for election one number for write-in votes. If a candidate administrators and voters. wants the write-in votes to be individually The Office of the Secretary of State certifies recorded, the candidate must file a written request with the Secretary of State no later voting systems for cities and counties across than seven days before the general or special the state. This process does not include the Election Day. This provides any declared systems used for RCV elections. This makes write-in candidate the same provisions for it difficult for cities to access voting systems tabulation as a candidate whose name is approved by the state. printed on the ballot. Because this Minn. Stat. §§ 204D.11 and 206.90 require requirement does not exist in city elections, the use of one ballot only for a state general city election officials are required to take election unless there is a need for a separate considerable time and resources to count and judicial ballot. To allow cities that have individually record write-in votes cast, many implemented RCV to hold municipal of which are frivolous. elections in conjunction with a state general Response: The League of Minnesota election, state statute must be amended to Cities supports legislation to: allow for more than one ballot. a) give cities the option to require that Response: The League of Minnesota write-in candidates for local elective Cities supports: offices file a formal request with the a) legislation that would give statutory chief election official at least seven cities the same authority given to days before the city election if they 70 charter cities to consider and adopt within their homes that best meets their RCV; needs. Allowing them to receive a ballot electronically, similarly to UOCAVA voters, b) statewide standards for those cities would subsequently allow them to complete that choose to adopt RCV to ensure it their ballot utilizing their own personal is implemented consistently assistive technology. State statute does not throughout the state to give voters allow a voter to complete a ballot confidence in the fairness of the electronically. alternative process of casting their ballots and in the outcome of such As election equipment and assistive elections; technology continues to evolve, it is critical that local elections administrators have c) a state certification process for voting flexibility in purchasing equipment and systems used in tabulating RCV technology that will best meet the needs of elections; and voters within their communities. d) allowing for the use of more than one Response: The League of Minnesota ballot should a city with RCV conduct Cities supports the ability of elections a municipal election in conjunction administrators to respond to the needs of with a state general election. voters who may benefit from assistance to ensure the greatest level of participation SD-78. Voter Assistance by those eligible to vote. This includes: Issue: Increasingly, voters may need a) Allowing the hiring of second assistance with language translation. language interpreters to staff polling Currently state statute does not allow for the places; hiring of language interpreters for the sole purpose of assisting voters with ballot b) Extending electronic voting to people language interpretation; they must also be with disabilities; and trained as and serve as election judges. This limits the availability and access to language c) Increasing flexibility for elections interpretation for voters. administrators to purchase assistive voting equipment and technology that The federal Uniformed and Overseas best meets the needs of voters with Citizens Absentee Voting Act(UOCAVA) disabilities. provides the legal basis for absentee voting requirements for U.S. citizens who are SD-79. Electronic Rosters active members of the Uniformed Services, the Merchant Marine, and the commissioned Issue:While electronic rosters (or"e-poll corps of the Public Health Service and the books")may increase efficiency and National Oceanic and Atmospheric decrease cost for some cities, this may not Administration, their eligible family be true for all. As cities explore the use of members and U.S citizens residing outside electronic rosters, data collected from the of the United States. This process allows a Office of the Secretary of State and from voter to complete a ballot electronically and jurisdictions that have used the technology, then return it via mail. Voters with may be helpful in determining next steps disabilities may have assistive technology and to improve the process. Currently when 71 a voter verifies their identity at a polling unnecessary in city special elections when place via an electronic roster, they sign a offices on the ballot are nonpartisan. paper form. State law does not allow voters to sign the e-poll book. Minn. Stat. § 204B.19 allows high school students to be excused from school to serve Response:As the Legislature continues to as a trainee election judge if the student examine the use of electronic rosters, submits a written request signed and cities should retain the option of utilizing approved by the student's parent or guardian this technology but should not be to be absent from school and a certificate required to do so. If cities choose to use e- from the appointing authority stating the poll books, the use of electronic signatures hours during which the student will serve as should be allowed to increase efficiency. a trainee election judge to the principal of To ensure there is a paper copy of the the school at least ten days prior to the signatures, the receipts printed by the election. This process is not currently electronic rosters should include a copy of extended to college students which has the voter's signature. proven to be a barrier for recruiting college students to serve as election judges. SD- 80. Election Judge Recruitment Additionally, teachers and college faculty and Retention are also allowed to take time off of work to serve as an election judge. Issue:Nearly 30,000 Minnesotans serve as election judges. The recruitment and Response: To ensure state requirements retention of election judges is a significant are met,party balance is maintained, and and essential component of administering to expand the opportunity of serving as elections throughout the State of Minnesota. an election judge to others, the League of Minnesota Cities supports the following State statute requires that precincts with changes: more than 500 registered voters be assigned at least four election judges and those with a) Authorize college students to get time fewer than 500 registered voters be assigned off from classes if they have been at least three election judges. Minn. Stat. § appointed to serve as an election 204B.21 requires that at least two election judge; judges in each precinct serve with a different major political party designation, except for b) Allow for one election judge affiliated student trainee election judges. The with any major political party defined remaining election judges in a precinct can in Minn. Stat. § 200.02, subd. 7 or serve without an affiliation to a major minor political party in Minn. Stat. § political party and no more than half the 200.02, subd. 23 to perform an judges in a precinct may belong to the same election activity that requires party major political party. Statute specifically balance specifically outlined in statute requires election judge party balance to and based on the election judge's oath perform four polling place activities: that all will perform duties in a fair assisting a voter in curbside voting; opening and impartial manner and not the ballot box; duplicating ballots; and in attempt to create an advantage for conducting an election at a Healthcare any party or candidate. If partisan Facility. Political party affiliation is also requirements cannot be met because of late staffing changes in the polling 72 place,then cities should be allowed to of the methods is citizen petition and Minn. meet party balance through an Rules 8205 provides specific criteria for election judge who has not declared a formatting. City staff then review the party affiliation; and petition to determine if it is valid and has met statutory requirements for completion c) Require major political parties to and submission. To ensure that both citizens provide updated lists of persons and city staff fully understand the interested in serving as election judges requirements, clarifying changes should be directly to cities and counties and on made. an ongoing basis so that recruitment lists are timely to best assist cities in Response: To improve the process for meeting party balance requirements. amending a city charter, the League of Minnesota Cities supports: SD- 81. Mail Balloting a) Adding clarifying language regarding Issue: Minn. Stat. § 204B.45 authorizes all "registered voters". These voters non-metropolitan townships and cities with must be eligible voters in the district less than 400 registered voters located for which the petition is being outside of the Minneapolis/St. Paul seven- circulated who are in active status on county metropolitan area to hold elections the statewide registration system at by mail. A city may conduct mail balloting the time of petition verification and for an individual precinct having fewer than have not had a name or address 100 registered voters, subject to the approval change since the most recent voter of the county auditor. registration application was submitted. Staffing and equipment needs can be very costly and mail balloting is an efficient way b) Ensuring that petitioners have access of conducting an election for cities that have to the petition,public information lists lower numbers of registered voters used to verify registered voters, and regardless of location in or outside the metro the examination log available for area. It is not uncommon for the redistricting inspection on request of any registered process to create very small precincts in the voter. metro area that are more cost-effectively served by a mail balloting process. c) Revising Minn. Rules 8205 to ensure Additionally, for special elections that that formatting requirements are historically have lower turnout, mail clear and up to date. balloting could increase voter participation. SD- 83. Presidential Nomination Response: The League of Minnesota Primary Cities supports allowing all cities to conduct mail balloting. Issue: In 2016, the legislature passed into law a process for the state of Minnesota to SD- 82. Modernizing Charter conduct a presidential nomination primary Amendment Process in 2020 for president of the United States. This is administered by cities and counties Issue: Minn. Stat. § 410.12 outlines the much the same way elections are conducted. process for amending city charters and one 73 Minn. Stat. § 207A.15 provides a process for absentee ballot and ensure their ballot is local units of government to be reimbursed submitted. for expenses incurred from conducting the primary. The Office of the Secretary of State There have been instances when facility (OSS) submits to the Department of staff have refused entry to city elections Management and Budget(MMB) an officials to provide health care facility estimated cost of administering the primary, outreach voting. It is essential that city staff and MMB provides funding to the OSS. are able to provide this service to ensure that That funding is then distributed to local every eligible resident is able to vote should units of government as a reimbursement they choose to. based on expense reporting submitted to the OSS. Because the presidential nomination It is not uncommon for residents of health primary is a partisan activity administered care facilities to move to different rooms or on behalf of political parties, it is critical units within a building. If their voter that local units of government be reimbursed registration is tied to a specific unit within fully and that no cost be borne by cities. the building, they must re-register to vote Additionally, conducting a primary election after moving or their ballot may be rejected. by mail could conserve resources and This is unnecessary given the resident still potentially increase voter participation. lives in the same facility. Response: The League of Minnesota The process for health care facility voting is Cities supports: required in precincts that conduct elections by mail. This is confusing for residents and a) Ensuring that local units of facility staff. This requirement should be government are fully reimbursed for eliminated in mail-only precincts though all anticipated and unanticipated costs elections administrators should work to of conducting the presidential ensure that any new resident of a facility is nomination primary; and able to register and receive a ballot. b) Allowing the presidential nomination Response: It is critical that those living in primary to be conducted via mail health care facilities are able to vote balloting. securely and with minimal complication. To do so,the League of Minnesota Cities SD- 84. Health Care Facility Voting supports amending state law to increase flexibility for cities and health care Issue: Minn. Stat. § 203B.11 outlines the facilities partnering in administering process for individuals living in health care elections. This includes: facilities to vote. Local election officials send teams of election judges to a) Extending the time period that clerks facilities such as nursing homes and are required to administer health care hospitals during the 20 days before the facility voting up to 46 days before an election. They distribute ballots to eligible election to coincide with the start of residents of the facility and provide absentee voting instead of the pre- assistance as needed. Allowing more time registration deadline.; for this process would increase resident ability to register to vote or apply for an 74 b) Requiring entry into facility for city facility or residential shelter, such as elections officials to ensure residents homeless shelter or woman's shelter, are able to vote; that assists people experiencing homelessness where their official c) Eliminating the need to include a election mail may be sent and have specific room or unit number on voter that serve as the address for assigning registration or absentee ballot a precinct and polling location. applications of those living in health care facilities; and b) Allow cities to do outreach in areas with concentrated populations of d) Exempting mail-only precincts from those experiencing homelessness to also conducting health care facility register people to vote, assist with voting while ensuring that new applications for absentee ballots, and residents are able to register and issue and receive ballots in a process receive a ballot. similar to Health Care Facility outreach. SD- 85. Voters Experiencing Homelessness SD- 86. Voter Registration Issue: Minnesotans experiencing Issue: While registering to vote is the most homelessness are able to register to vote critical step an eligible voter must complete using the location of where they usually prior to casting a ballot, it remains a sleep as defined in Minn. Stat. § 200.031. complicated process and barrier to new This could be an intersection or shelter voters. Procedures currently utilized in the address. Because the voter does not have a state have largely remained unchanged for permanent mailing address, the registration many election cycles and fail to account for is often challenged which then requires a changes in population demographics and voter to re-register each election. This increasing demands for non-traditional process also requires a registered voter in voting methods. the precinct to vouch for that person which can be difficult to find when experiencing Minn. Stat. § 201.061 currently stipulates homelessness. that eligible voters may either register to vote no less than 20 days prior to an election For those experiencing homelessness, or on Election Day at their polling place. In leaving their space and any belongings can addition to completing the necessary potentially mean losing them. This becomes paperwork, a potential voter is required to a significant barrier to registering to vote provide proof of identity and residence. One and participating in elections. option for proof of residence is to have a registered voter from the same voting Response: The League of Minnesota precinct vouch for the eligible voter. Cities supports the following to improve the process for voters experiencing The vouching process is a vital option for homelessness to safely and securely vote. voters lacking current documentation but remains challenging. While voters very a) Update Minn. Stat§ 200.031 to allow likely know people in their neighborhood, an eligible voter to designate a this does not guarantee they reside in the residential address or the address of a same voting precinct. Local roads are often 75 used to divide voting precincts, thus putting Additionally,under Minn. Rules 8200.5100, neighbors across the street in different voters may present bills due or dated within precincts. This issue is even more prevalent 30 days of Election Day to meet proof of for voters experiencing homelessness where residence requirements. This timetable can vouching is often the only viable option for be problematic when the absentee voting registering. Expanding the eligible vouching period starts 46-days prior to the election. list to those who reside in the same city The 30-day window around Election Day would provide further flexibility to voters often results in some voters not having a and allow election officials to still track the current enough bill to register in the first few limit of 8 vouches per person. weeks of absentee voting. It can be confusing for voters as to why their most Under Minn. Rules 8200.5100 the Secretary current bill is not accepted as proof of of State defines the list of acceptable residence. Having a start date coincide with documents that voters may use for proof of the start of absentee voting would provide residence. While there are many options more voters access and remove confusion on currently authorized, many comparable or the different deadlines. similar documents are not currently allowed. The lack of consistency creates a great deal Response: The League of Minnesota of confusion for voters as to why documents Cities supports modernizing current voter providing the same information are not registration procedures such as: treated the same. New emerging industries and services are also not accounted for. a) Expanding eligible vouchers to any Consideration should be given to adding registered voter in the same city. documents like work paystubs, tax returns, mortgage closing paperwork, non-standard b) Expanding the list of acceptable lease/rental agreements (Hotels, AirBnB, documents that can be used for proof group homes), a social service agency letter of residence. describing where a homeless voter lives, USPS address change verification, and other c) Expanding the current 30-day window documents issued by government entities. for original bills that voters may utilize for registration to coincide with the 46-day absentee voting period. 76 IMPROVING LOCAL ECONOMIES LE-1. Growth Management and d) Give cities broader authority to Annexation extend their zoning, subdivision, and other land-use controls outside the Issue:Unplanned and uncontrolled growth city's boundaries, regardless of the has a negative environmental, fiscal, and existence of county or township governmental impact on cities, counties, and controls, to ensure conformance with the state because it increases the cost of city facilities and services; providing government services and results in the loss of natural resource areas and prime e) Clearly define and differentiate agricultural land. between urban and rural development and restrict urban growth without Response: The League of Minnesota municipal services or annexation Cities believes the existing framework for agreements outside city boundaries. guiding growth and development This should contain a requirement primarily through local plans and that counties and joint power districts controls adopted by local governments that provide sewer, water, and other should form the basis of a statewide services, which have been traditionally planning policy, and that the state should provided by cities, include as a not adopt a mandatory comprehensive condition of providing service the statewide planning process. Rather, the annexation of properties that are the state should: recipients of such services in cases where annexation is requested by a a) Provide additional financial and city that could feasibly be providing technical assistance to local those services; governments for cooperative planning and growth management issues, f) Facilitate the annexation of urban particularly where new land to cities by amending state comprehensive plans have been statutes that regulate annexation to mandated by the Legislature; make it easier for cities to annex developed or developing land within b) Keep comprehensive planning unincorporated areas; timelines on a ten-year cycle due to the financial and workload impacts g) Oppose legislation that would these processes place on cities; reinstate the election requirement in contested annexations; c) Clearly establish the public purposes served by existing statewide controls, h) Support legislation to prohibit such as shore land zoning and detachment of parcels from cities wetlands conservation; clarify, unless approval of the detachment has simplify, and streamline these been granted by both the affected city controls; eliminate duplication in their and township and the affected county administration; and fully defend and has been notified prior to the city and hold harmless any local government township acting on the request; sued for a "taking" as a result of executing state land-use policies; 77 i) Oppose legislation that allows orderly numbers of nonconformities on properties annexation agreements to be adopted within city limits and would make state that prohibit annexation by other wildlife management areas far less desirable cities of property not being annexed due to impacts on future city development. under the agreement; In rural areas, where this is less of a j) Encourage ideas consistent with the concern, counties and townships have the long-term goal of allowing urban authority to object to the state purchasing development only in areas currently land for the outdoor recreation system for or about to become urban or these very reasons. Cities do not have that suburban in character; and statutory right. Due to recent statutory changes (Minn. Stat. § 97A.137, subd. 4) k) Establish stricter criteria on the removing city authority to adopt ordinances amount cities can pay to townships as related to firearm discharge, hunting and part of an orderly annexation trapping activity in wildlife management agreement so that payments to areas within their borders, these purchases townships are limited to should not occur without city consent and reimbursement for lost property tax input. base for no more than a fixed number of years, documented stranded Response: The League of Minnesota assessments, and other items for Cities opposes the state imposing which there is a clear nexus. retroactive development restrictions around existing wildlife management LE-2. Wildlife Management Areas areas. Issue: The Department of Natural Resources When purchasing state wildlife has been pressing for legislative management areas and other requirements creating development conservation and outdoor recreation restrictions on property adjacent to land system land,the state should either purchased by the state for hunting and other purchase sufficient land to provide an conservation purposes. This issue has been internal buffer from surrounding increasingly controversial as urban growth development or purchase development extends into areas previously considered rights to land adjacent to the property if rural and residential property owners are such a buffer is deemed essential to finding themselves adjacent to public preserving the intended uses for the hunting land. With large amounts of new property. This should be required for new revenue going into state land purchase for land purchases and done where feasible game and fish habitat and public access for existing wildlife management areas. purposes because of the passage of the constitutional amendment, these problems Furthermore,Minn. Stat. § 84.944 and § could occur even more frequently. 97A.145 should be amended to include cities in the local government notification The solution being proposed will put local and approval process the state must governments in the position of enforcing follow before purchasing public land. state land use restrictions and would require extensive changes to local plans, controls and ordinances. It would also create large 78 LE-3. Official State Mapping proceedings. Eliminating authority of Responsibility municipal electric utilities to extend services, or making extension of municipal Issue: For many years, the Minnesota electric service to annexed property Department of Transportation (MnDOT) has unreasonably costly, would interfere with provided the mapping services to keep community development and make it survey-level accuracy in place for the state's unfeasible for municipal electric utilities to official maps and records. That information serve properties located within rural electric changes when roads are made or improved, cooperative (REC) or other electric service and needs regular adjustment when provider service territory in annexed areas, municipal boundary adjustments are made. even if the REC or other electric utility had The information is then used at all levels of not served them prior to annexation. government to accurately determine property boundaries for transportation aid, Response: The League of Minnesota utility service boundaries, state and local Cities opposes any attempt to remove or funding formulas, election issues, and a alter the eminent domain option available number of other uses. to municipal electric utilities in state law, or to make it financially unfeasible for No state agency, however, has ever been municipal utilities to compensate rural statutorily provided with mapping electric cooperatives or other electric responsibility and MnDOT is not funded for utilities for serving future customers who providing that level of detail in its mapping. reside in annexed areas where that Because MnDOT, as an agency, requires electric utility has not provided service. less specificity in its maps, a change has slowly been integrated to mostly restrict LE-5. Statutory Approval MnDOT mapping to what changes occur in Timelines road ownership and responsibility, leaving many mapping needs unmet for other users Issue: Cities since 1995 have been required of boundary data. to act on written requests relating to zoning, septic systems, the expansion of Response: The League of Minnesota Metropolitan Urban Service Areas (MUSA), Cities supports legislation making a and other land-use applications in named state entity the official provider of accordance with a statutory time period survey-level mapping for the state, generally referred to as the 60-day rule. including maps for municipal boundary Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 15.99, state and adjustments. The Legislature must local government agencies must approve or provide the necessary appropriations to deny a permit within a statutory timeframe. the entity for providing that service. Failure by the agency to issue a specific denial of the application is deemed an LE-4. Electric Service Extension approval. Issue: Minnesota law preserves the right of Minn. Stat. § 15.99 does not directly address municipal electric utilities to grow with the whether an appeal of a decision triggers an cities they serve. Municipal electric utilities extension or is part of an original zoning may grow either through application to the request that must be handled within the 60- Minnesota Public Utilities Commission or 120-day time period. In a 2004 Minnesota (MPUC) or through condemnation Court of Appeals decision, the court found 79 that a zoning application is not approved or instances are fairly handled to ensure a fair denied for the purposes of Minn. Stat. § public process can occur for all interested 15.99 until the city has resolved all appeals and involved parties. challenging the application.Moreno v. City of Minneapolis, 676 N.W.2d 1 (Minn. Ct. While the Legislature has clarified some App. 2004). According to the court, an aspects of this law, additional modifications appeal is not a request for a permit, license are necessary to assist cities in providing or other governmental approval; therefore, it accurate and timely responses to applicants does not trigger a new 60-day time period. and to allow adequate time for public input. Under this interpretation, a decision Furthermore, as city staff and financial rendered by a zoning board or planning resources are increasingly limited, flexibility commission is not the final approval or in the length of approval timeline denial of an application if the city allows an requirements may be needed at the local appeal to the city council. level. This court decision is problematic for a Response: The Legislature should repeal couple of reasons. Forcing cities to further or amend Minn. Stat. § 15.99. If repeal is condense the process for considering unlikely, amendments should: planning and zoning applications will make it more difficult to gather public input and a) Increase the initial time limit to 90 leave less time for thoughtful deliberation by days or have the language in Minn. zoning boards and planning commissions. It Stat. § 15.99 apply as the default may also provide an incentive for cities to requirement only in cases where extend the original 60-day period in every permitting bodies have not established instance in order to build-in adequate time to an independent approval timeline; consider possible appeals. b) Clarify that approval does not The Minnesota Supreme Court recently abrogate the need for approvals under issued another 60-day rule decision that held other applicable federal, state or local that an application to the Minneapolis requirements; Heritage Preservation Commission for a certificate of appropriateness was a"written c) Provide appeal rights to adjacent request related to zoning," and therefore was property owners; subject to the automatic approval provision d) Clarify that,if requests are to be of the 60-day rule. 500, LLC v. City of decided by a board, commission or Minneapolis, 837 N.W. 2d 287 (Minn. other agent of a governmental agency, 2013). This opinion creates ambiguity and and the decision of the board, uncertainty about what permit applications are subject to the law. commission or other agent is adopted subject to appeal to the governing Additionally, the statute does not allow for body of the agency, then the agency exceptions to the timelines in event of may extend the 60-day time limit to extenuating local circumstances. If a state of resolve the appeal; and emergency limits the ability of city staff to e) More clearly define that the phrase complete the work, it should not result in a "related to zoning" refers to a de facto approval of applications. traditional land use decision such as Clarification is needed about how these 80 rezoning, conditional use permits, and fact that the property is clearly benefitted by variances. the retaining wall. f) To address states of emergency, add The special assessment statute anticipates the following new language to the the need for cities to create retaining walls statute: (h) The time limits in when making public improvements, and this subdivision 2 and 3 are paused if the holding could create significant costs for governor declares a state of cities forced to repair and maintain retaining emergency under section 12.31. In walls that benefit a single property. A choice cases described in these paragraphs, by a developer or previous property owner the deadlines in the areas included in to build a retaining wall to improve the the emergency declaration remain value or usefulness of property may appear paused until ten days after the to be necessary today, but determining who expiration of the state of emergency, first created the need for lateral support in applied to any written application the past can involve costly and time- awaiting action that was submitted consuming historical research that may not prior to or during the state of reveal a clear answer. emergency. Response: The Legislature should amend LE-6. Maintenance of Retaining the special assessment statute so that Walls Adjacent to Public Rights of retaining walls needed to facilitate public Way improvements are treated the same as other local improvements. In cases where Issue: The Minnesota Constitution grants retaining walls located along public rights cities the power to "levy and collect of way or within drainage and utility assessments for local improvements upon easements separate public improvements property benefited hereby."Retaining walls from adjacent properties,the Legislature are one of the many improvements that a should establish a rebuttable presumption city is authorized to make on behalf of its that the need for lateral support was citizens, and Minnesota's special assessment created by the property owner. law, Minn. Stat. ch. 429, authorizes cities to charge special assessments on properties LE-7. Development Disputes that are benefitted by an improvement. Issue: State law is clear that fees collected The Minnesota Court of Appeals held that under Minn. Stat. ch. 462 are eligible for the city of Minneapolis had a nondelegable judicial review in the event of dispute. The duty of lateral support to a property owner Legislature limited the timeframe during with a retaining wall abutting a city which an aggrieved party may challenge sidewalk. Howell v. City of Minneapolis, planning and zoning fees to 60 days after 2013 WL 1707759 (April 22, 2013). A approval of an application. However, the subsequent jury found that the city created law is not clear about what notice the need for lateral support when it built the requirements to the municipality are street and sidewalk adjacent to the property, necessary, relative to the timing for a person making the city responsible for the aggrieved by an ordinance or decision under maintenance the retaining wall, despite the the municipal planning act to seek review. 81 Response: The Legislature should amend home. Some communities have encountered Minn. Stat. § 462.361 to establish a 60- a situation where a property owner is buying day time limitation in which an aggrieved many homes in a community, then selling person may bring an action against the them on contract for deed. This can allow a municipality. person to essentially act as a landlord while evading a city's rental inspection and rental LE-8. Foreclosure and licensing process, while the buyers lose the Neighborhood Stabilization traditional legal rights and protections as tenants. Many view it as a way to rent the Issue: Cities dedicate scarce resources to property and may not be aware of it being a address public safety and maintenance contract for deed. challenges associated with foreclosed, vacant, and under-maintained homes. Left Numerous problems arise for cities and unaddressed, these properties destabilize neighborhoods when property owners are neighborhoods, depress neighborhood acting essentially as renters. It is difficult to property values, and potentially increase the determine who is responsible for costs of municipal services. Cities' revenue maintaining the property or for paying utility also continues to decline due to delinquent bills and property taxes, and cities may not utility payments and property tax payments, be able to inspect substandard properties if as well as added costs for nuisance they are not subject to a lease agreement. In abatements. Although the number of those some situations,property owners may wish mortgage foreclosures has stabilized to have a renter be the responsible party for somewhat since the peak of the recession in utility bills and utilize contract for deed 2008 and the height of the COVID-19 arrangements to have the person living on pandemic, issues surrounding community the property be the responsible party. The recovery remain ongoing. property may also not be recorded at the county for homesteading purposes if the State and local governments can play an buyer is not aware of the formal change in important role in spurring reinvestment in ownership that results from a contract for struggling neighborhoods, but without deed. additional resources to address the variety and costly impacts of foreclosures and In recent years, investor ownership of vacant properties, cities cannot maintain or single-family housing stock has steadily increase those activities to meet local needs. increased as investors including both small The federal government has provided funds investors and large private equity companies for neighborhood stabilization and direct have continued to purchase large numbers of mortgage assistance to residents, but such single-family homes to convert to residential funds are limited in eligible uses and scope, rental uses. According to the Minneapolis and they are only available to a limited Federal Reserve Bank, investor-ownership number of cities. rate for residential properties in the metropolitan area has more than doubled Contracts for deed have been used to since 2006. The growing trend of investor successfully buy and sell thousands of ownership continues to impact city housing homes around Minnesota. However, some stock as investor purchases of affordable property owners use contracts for deed as an single-family homes remove alternative to a traditional lease, even though homeownership opportunities and make it the purchaser has no intention of buying the harder for lower-income households to 82 compete in the housing market. While e) Improve notification to cities, and investor ownership creates single-family consistency in the information rental opportunities, strategies deployed by available to cities, when a property is certain investors that seek to maximize in the foreclosure process and vacated profits can lead to a deterioration of housing and advance policies that make it quality easier for cities to step in during the tax forfeiture sale process in order to Response: The Legislature should: more effectively address blighted properties. a) Secure increased state and federal resources and provide financing tools f) Support coordinated responses to to help cover city costs associated with prevent foreclosures, activate and foreclosed and/or vacant properties, guide private investment and home community revitalization strategies, purchases, and support distressed and community investment, including neighborhoods. revenue sources for programs that support foreclosure mitigation, g) Study and monitor the impacts on the homeownership counseling, and housing market of investor-owned expanded homeownership homes and enact policy that provides opportunities and are sustainable. cities with the tools to mitigate any negative impacts on city housing stock b) Allow cities to take actions necessary and prospective homebuyers due to to protect foreclosed and/or vacant investor-owned purchasing of homes. homes from damage and to help preserve property values in h) Re-enact a program at the state level neighborhoods where concentrations similar to "This Old House" to allow of such conditions are present, owners of qualifying single-family including an expedited process to homes or multi-unit rental properties address nuisance properties. to defer the increase in tax capacity from repairs or improvements to their c) Reexamine the Contract for Deed homestead property as an incentive statutes to determine whether for cities to maintain housing stock or additional protections are necessary to provide state assistance to cities who prevent property owners from wish to provide incentives for evading responsibilities of a landlord, homeowners to make repairs and and provide local jurisdictions improvements to their property. resources to allow for education of future buyers and sellers in contract i) Support programs that provide for deed arrangements. resources to cities for rehabilitation or new construction of single-family d) Support local authority for cities to homes, such as the Community collect all delinquent taxes, utility Impact Fund and the Community Fix bills, liens, and assessments on Up Program currently administered foreclosed, vacant, boarded and/or tax through MN Housing Finance Agency forfeited properties. (MHFA). 83 LE-9. Housing Policy 53%. According to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency analysis of the 2018 U.S. Issue: Cities recognize that stable housing is Census Bureau's American Community essential to the health, safety, and welfare of Survey, Minnesota has one of the highest residents. Since the Fair Housing Act of homeownership rates in the nation, but the 1968, and more recently with the state has the fourth largest disparity in recognition that certain barriers to housing homeownership rates between white/non- disparately impact certain members of our Hispanic households and households of communities, local government has been color. obligated to promote and reduce barriers to fair housing and equal opportunity. For According to the 2018 U.S. Census Bureau's example, households with housing choice American Community Survey, households vouchers face many barriers to securing of color are also more likely to experience housing in the private rental market, cost burden(paying more than 30% of their especially when rental vacancy rates are income on housing). In Minnesota, 40% of low. Currently rental vacancy rates are at a households of color experience cost burden historic low in much of the state. As a as compared to 23% of white households. result, many families and individuals may be Project based and voucher based rental unable to use their housing choice vouchers assistance that enable renters to pay no more and thus unable to secure safe, decent and than 30% of their income on housing are affordable housing. Additionally, many critical to reducing cost burden disparities. renters and homeowners face challenges Nationally, according to data analysis from housing displacement due to rising provided by the Urban Institute, only 1 in 5 costs,uninhabitable housing, and eviction households who qualify for a Section 8 that exacerbates housing instability and voucher receive this critical form of rental homelessness. assistance. State rental assistance programs are underfunded and are only intended to Despite progress since the Fair Housing Act serve as last resort efforts to prevent of 1968, households of color nevertheless homelessness. As a result, low-income experience a gap in homeownership rates families often make tradeoffs to reduce compared with white households and have housing costs. Families may choose or only faced barriers to housing due to a history of be able to afford living in poor-quality, housing policies and lending practices that substandard housing or a long distance from disproportionately benefit white households work opportunities to reduce housing costs. (i.e., application of GI bill largely only to The imbalance between the demand for white soldiers returning from war, redlining, affordable housing and the supply of low- and restrictive covenants). According to the cost rentals contributes to increasing U.S. Census Bureau and American housing costs. At the same time, wages have Community Survey data, the remained stagnant and not kept up with homeownership rate non-Hispanic White increased housing costs resulting in more Americans has held consistently above 71%. and more families experiencing housing cost However, the homeownership rate for Black burden. Rent-burdened households have Americans remains the lowest of all racial higher eviction rates, increased financial groups nationally at 41.8 percent. fragility, and wider use of social safety net Comparatively for Hispanic Americans, the programs, compared with other renters and homeownership rate is around 47% and for homeowners. The rates and severity of rent Asian Americans, it has hovered around burden, especially for households of color, 84 have increased housing instability and LE-10. Resources for Affordable resulted in fewer households transitioning Housing from renters to homeowners. Issue: Cities, along with local housing Response: The Legislature should: officials, are concerned about the need for a) Support resources and programs that proactive commitment at the state level to seek to assist communities in their aid cities to meet demand for affordable efforts to reduce barriers to housing housing that is sensitive to local conditions, and promote fair housing and equal emerging trends, and changing opportunity and support efforts by the demographics. This includes meeting the federal government to promote fair needs of lowest-income households as well housing policies intended to protect as an aging population and ensuring a wide people from housing discrimination range of lifecycle housing options that allow and encourage the federal government seniors of all incomes to stay in their to provide more flexibility within the community, addressing racial disparity gaps Section 8 voucher program so that in housing, and responding to emerging trends, such as the need to preserve federally renters can more readily maintain and subsidized housing and naturally occurring place their vouchers in a tight rental (unsubsidized) affordable housing. The market. League also recognizes that federal, state b) Support housing stability for renters and local governments all have a role to play through policies that mitigate the in meeting affordable housing needs, impact of or reduce evictions filed. overcoming barriers to housing stability such as high market prices, eviction, and c) Seek to identify and reduce racial foreclosure, and responding to problems disparities in homeownership in caused by vacant homes and the increase in Minnesota and support policies and rental properties that are the result of encourage innovative solutions that foreclosure. address structural barriers for people of color when it comes to accessing A comprehensive report issued in 2018 by housing including policies that the then Governor's Task Force on Housing encourage fair lending and provide delineated 30 specific recommendations to homebuyer education and funding for help achieve six goals, including: commit to down payment assistance to low- homes as a priority; preserve the homes we income households. have; build more homes; increase home stability; link homes and services; and d) Support programs that reduce cost support and strengthen homeownership. The burden among renters and support Task Force's recommendations were based policies that address barriers for upon input from various statewide people of color when accessing safe, stakeholders, local governments and healthy and decent affordable rental residents and renters impacted by the lack of housing. affordable housing in this state. These recommendations provide an important list of housing goals that should continue to be considered as cities work towards 85 addressing affordable housing issues in their to a local affordable housing trust communities. fund. Response: The Legislature should: d) Expand authority for all cities to transfer unobligated pooled increment a) Support the affordable housing from a housing or redevelopment TIF priorities of the Minnesota Housing district to support a local housing Finance Agency (MHFA), which trust fund for any eligible expenditure include making resources and under Minn. Stat. § 462C.16. methods available to maintain and improve existing affordable homes, e) Substantially increase long-term including publicly subsidized deeply funding for the Economic affordable, and housing stock that is Development & Challenge Fund to aging such as naturally occurring leverage local private and public (unsubsidized) affordable housing. resources to develop workforce rental and single-family homes. b) Provide stable and long-term funding, including but not limited to dedicated f) Support legislation to provide sales, funding sources, for Minnesota use, and transaction tax exemptions or Housing and other affordable housing reductions for development and programs, including those that production of affordable housing and encourage innovation and recognize use state bond proceeds for land regional markets,provides flexibility banking and trusts as well as for cities to create partnerships and rehabilitation and construction of leverage resources with private and affordable housing. public entities, such as: capital investment funding for affordable and g) Provide funding and financing tools to public housing, funding for supportive cities to create affordable senior services and programs that address housing for our aging population. homelessness and reduce barriers to stable housing and homeownership, a h) Provide funding and financing tools to tax credit contribution fund or a state cities to create affordable housing and low-income housing tax credit to help prevent foreclosure for veterans. rebuild the state's partnership with local governments in the development i) Support for funding to reduce the of homeownership, and multi-family racial gap in homeownership rates, rental assistance and housing such as targeted homeownership renovation programs. capacity building and homebuyer assistance. c) Consider establishing a program to address immediate needs throughout j) Support additional funding for the the year to provide a match for new or housing choice voucher programs or existing city-supported affordable other rental assistance programs and housing projects. This could include financial, tax, and/or other incentives matching funds, issued on a timeline for rental property owners to that is consistent with local budgeting participate in these programs. processes, for local revenues allocated 86 k) Support the current 4d Low-Income Minnesota communities often have vastly Rental Classification under Minn. different market conditions for housing that Stat. § 273.128 that provides a class can necessitate priorities that vary from rate reduction in property taxes to metropolitan areas. Greater Minnesota cities qualifying low-income rental face unique challenges that affect the properties. Base any program affordability, quality, and availability of expansion proposals on the full housing. While local communities in greater analysis regarding impacts to local Minnesota are focusing on local efforts to property tax bases contained in the attract development and encourage growth, January 2022 Minnesota Department assistance is often needed from state and of Revenue 4d Affordable Housing federal resources to construct and Report and ensure that any rehabilitate greater Minnesota housing stock modifications to the program are and that assistance should better balanced between the tax benefit to accommodate the varying realities of a existing and future 4d units and the diverse state and housing markets. increased tax burden on the existing property tax base due to any Like many metropolitan cities, greater expansion. Oppose any changes to the Minnesota city housing studies often cite 4d Low-Income Rental Classification challenges at many levels of the economic program that substantially increases spectrum that impact local economies and the tax responsibility for residents and population growth. However, incomes businesses or increases the tax benefit within exclusively rural and rural/town mix for landlords without including counties are well below average incomes in increased benefits for renters of 4d exclusively urban counties. The US Bureau units including but not limited to of Economic Analysis demonstrates over a deeper affordability or property 62% earnings gap between entirely rural and reinvestment. Support the entirely urban counties. Greater Minnesota implementation of a reporting process communities in many cases do not have a for landlords and consider a sunset significant percentage of high-earner period for any changes made to the workers that earn a high enough salary to program to evaluate the range of afford today's newly constructed housing impacts that expanding the program units. This factor along with the rising costs may have. of construction materials and labor are outside of the control of local communities 1) Support funding for infrastructure but lead to an overall lack of housing stock grants available to cities to assist with in many greater Minnesota cities. the cost of providing critical infrastructure and ensure that However, one of the most vexing difference residential sites are shovel ready for in the housing continuum is the lack of development. production of market rate housing in rural communities. The lack of market rate LE-11. Greater Minnesota Housing production has led to aging housing stock in greater Minnesota cities that hinders Issue: Cities in greater Minnesota share economic growth. At least 25% of the many of the same housing needs as metro housing stock in 34 of greater Minnesota's communities. However, not unlike differing 80 counties was built before 1940 and only real estate markets within a city, greater four counties in greater Minnesota have 5% 87 or more of their housing stock constructed in b) Require a comprehensive analysis 2010 or later. The aging owner-occupied of the state's housing assistance and rental housing stock have low assessed programs to better determine the values far below any reasonable cost of new specific needs of greater Minnesota construction and thereby translates to an communities and adjust programs environment where lenders and developers accordingly. often shy away from new market rate developments because of these valuations or c) Change Tax Increment Financing low prevailing rents. rules to address specific housing challenges in greater Minnesota, The circumstances also mean that the few including but not limited to, affordable housing projects that do make permanently extending the their way to greater Minnesota are often timeframe for pooling notably of higher quality than the average redevelopment TIF projects from market rate housing stock if they were lucky 5 to 10 years to allow more enough to produce any. Many of these flexibility for rural communities to affordable units rent for 20-37%higher than amass properties and finance what individuals would otherwise be able to projects while removing blight and afford in many greater Minnesota cities if allowing TIF to be used for they were buying a median valued home of workforce or market rate housing significant age. Though numbers certainly production in areas of low market differ, modest market rate units that have rate production to provide parity been attempted or in some instances at a 25-year duration. advanced in our communities have a per unit cost of$140-$150,000 while a tax credit d) Appropriate more state resources project with their added soft cost can often and establish grant and forgivable reach costs of$225,000 per unit or more. loan programs that support Project costs for workforce housing can also market rate and senior housing become prohibitive for many developers in development proposals in greater greater Minnesota due to prevailing wage Minnesota communities where requirements. While greater Minnesota production is extremely low. cities are looking to gain every advantage and stretch limited local resources for e) Work to address the disconnect housing, more state assistance should be between communities that follow focused to allow rural communities to the Statewide Building Code and minimize the financial gap of market rate those areas that do not to ensure a production. level playing field while encouraging prudent health and Response: The Legislature should: safety measures. Furthermore,the building code should not be used a) Appropriate funding to state to further disadvantage cities for assistance programs serving the investments they have made in greater Minnesota to account for infrastructure to comply with the state imposed prevailing wage regulatory and smart growth requirements. principles. 88 LE-12. Energy Efficiency Increased exposure to educational Improvement Requirements for information, such as increased access to Housing energy audits and more familiarity with and access to programs that finance energy Issue: Rising energy costs have brought efficiency projects could increase adoption attention to the poor energy efficiency of of energy efficiency improvements. Electric many private residences and multi-family utilities provide successful, cost-effective properties, especially in older housing stock. energy efficiency programs, have a customer The affordability of housing could be relationship with homeowners, a regulatory severely impacted by continued increases in requirement to meet energy demand home energy costs. Improvements in the reduction goals through conservation energy efficiency of housing would improve spending, and access to technical expertise the affordability of local housing options that can take into account variations in and would help achieve state energy demand building age and construction. Cities could, and greenhouse gas emission reduction however, play a strong role in increasing goals. The challenge is how best to achieve public exposure to approved educational that result. materials and providing incentives through the use of other local financing support Legislative discussions have suggested that options for property owners, such as grants, minimum energy efficiency improvements loans, and a Property Assessed Clean could be added as point-of-sale Energy (P.A.C.E.)program. Cities could requirements, including energy use also take advantage of the recently added disclosure and basic renovations such as assessment authority in Minn. Stat. § improved attic insulation levels, window 429.021 to provide financing for energy caulking and other air sealing, or improved improvement projects in residential light fixtures. properties of five or more units if a property owner petitions for an energy improvement While the goals of such a program are project in an existing building. laudable, there are a number of concerns for how this would actually be accomplished in Response: The League of Minnesota individual cities. Most cities do not, for Cities agrees that there is a need to example, have point of sale inspections. improve the energy efficiency of There will also be cases where the building residential building stock to reduce could be structurally unable to meet high energy consumption and improve the attic insulation requirements, such as with affordability and livability of housing. manufactured housing or with older houses The state should focus its efforts on with very little attic space. There are also improving educational programs and on concerns that the cost of meeting these improving the use of the existing energy requirements could result in statewide Conservation Improvement homeowners being reluctant to sell their Program (CIP) and similar programs and houses because of the expense of the provide property owners with technical improvements that would be required to and financial support for weatherization meet new standards or property owners and energy efficiency improvements. passing on the cost of upgrades to tenants. Further,the state should work to make residential Property Assessed Clean Energy(P.A.C.E.) programs viable for local governments. 89 Cities should use their communication inclusion of people with and without tools, such as newsletters,web sites, and disabilities in their communities, but these staff communications to promote these policies are best implemented with minimal efforts and to help link property owners encroachments on municipal zoning to educational materials and program authority and positive working relationships resources. Additionally, cities could be between cities, care providers, and the state. incentivized to adopt strategies to disclose energy usage data for building owners to On one hand, treating persons with identify options for cost-efficient energy disabilities differently generally raises improvements. questionable issues of disparate treatment with the Federal Fair Housing Act. On the LE-13. In-Home Day Care Facilities other hand, without some regulation, cities are powerless to protect individuals with Issue: There are restrictions on the ability of disabilities from a clustering of residential a city to regulate licensed day care facilities. programs within one neighborhood. As the Minn. Stat. § 462.357, subd. 7, states that Department of Justice has stated, while certain licensed residential facilities and day density regulations are generally suspect, "if care facilities must be considered a a neighborhood came to be composed permitted single-family use for zoning largely of group homes, that could adversely purposes. The restriction is designed to affect individuals with disabilities and protect"in-home"daycare facilities, but the would be inconsistent with the objective of law applies even if the facility is not the integrating persons with disabilities into the primary residence of the day care provider. community." (Joint Statement of the This creates a loophole for providers to use a Department of Justice and the Department single-family home as a commercial daycare of Housing and Urban Development.) facility, which might not otherwise be allowable under a city zoning ordinance. To this end, and in upholding a state and local dispersal requirement, the Eighth Response: The Legislature should amend Circuit Court of Appeals stated that the Minn. Stat. § 462.357, subd. 7, to clarify requirement was designed to ensure that that a licensed day care facility serving 12 people with disabilities "needing residential or fewer persons is considered a treatment will not be forced into enclaves of permitted single-family use only if the treatment facilities that would replicate and license holder owns or rents and resides thus perpetuate the isolation resulting from in the home. institutionalization."Familystyle of St. Paul, Inc. v. St. Paul, 923 F.2d 91, 95 (8th Cir. LE-14. Residential Programs 1991). Issue: Minnesota's deinstitutionalization City authority to regulate the locations of policy seeks to ensure that all people can residential programs is limited by state live in housing that maximizes community statute and the federal Fair Housing Act integration. Minn. Stat. § 462.357, subd. 6a. (FHA), although Minn. Stat. § 245A.11, states that"persons with disabilities should subd. 4, prohibits the Commissioner of not be excluded by municipal zoning Human Services from granting an initial ordinance or other land use regulations from license to a residential program of six or the benefits of normal residential fewer people within 1,320 feet of an existing surroundings."Minnesota cities support 90 residential program in cities of the first it is in the best interest of the state, care class. providers, and those individuals served, that all parties include cities as partners before In 2015, Minn. Stat. § 245A.11, subd. 4, was opening a residential program to best plan amended to clarify that the Commissioner of for community integration. Human Services is required to approve licenses for"community residential settings" Response: Cities should maintain the within 1,320 feet of existing residential statutory authority to require agencies, as programs. A"community residential well as licensed and registered providers setting" is commonly known as adult foster that operate residential programs,to care. While this was the original intent of notify the city before properties are the legislature, statutory terms changed over operated. Cities should be provided with the years; this amendment was to make the necessary contact information after a various statutory references consistent. residential program is licensed or registered. Providers applying to operate In 2022, Minn. Stat. § 245A.11, subd. 2, was residential programs should be required amended to temporarily allow licensed to contact the city to be informed of residential care services provided to more applicable local regulations. Finally, than four people with developmental licensing or registering authorities must disabilities in a supervised living facility, be responsible for removing any residents including intermediate care facilities for incapable of living in such an people with developmental disabilities as a environment, particularly if they become permitted single-family residential use at an a danger to themselves or others. increased capacity of seven to eight people until July 2023. Cities that have zoning LE-15. Inclusionary Housing regulation already in place prohibiting this type of facility as a single-family residential Issue: Provisions in current state statute use do not have to permit the use. (Minn. Stat. § 462.358, subd. 11) allowing cities to enter into development agreements Sufficient funding and oversight are needed for the inclusion of a portion of the units in to ensure that residents living in residential the development to be affordable for low- or programs have appropriate care and moderate-income families have been a supervision, and that neighborhoods and source of conflict between cities and residents of residential programs are not housing developers. negatively impacted by high concentrations of these types of programs. As it stands now, Cities are concerned builders that view this there is nothing preventing clustering of statute as a restriction on local authority to residential programs in most cities in the adopt policies that promote availability of state. Cities want to be part of the solution, housing affordable to those who are unable and more than anything cities desire to be, to purchase or rent housing at price points and should be, partners in serving the that the market alone provides. policies of deinstitutionalization. Cities have an interest in, and are in the best Response: The Legislature should: position, to preserve a balance in residential neighborhoods between residential programs a) Strengthen and clarify cities' and all other uses. Because Minnesota cities authority to carry out policies that are committed to inclusion of all individuals, offer developers a range of incentives 91 in return for including a designated Currently, Land Trust properties have a tax number of affordable units in their classification of 1.0% and property owners projects. must pay property taxes based on the market value of the property, which is assessed b) Identify strategies to ensure long-term relative to neighboring properties. However, affordability of rental and owner- because land trust properties are to remain occupied housing produced as a result permanently affordable, land trust owners of such policies and practices can only receive a portion of the including expanding the parameters appreciation of the value of the home when of affordable housing restrictive a sale is made. covenants to extend beyond 30 years to ensure long-term affordability. Response: The Legislature should: c) Focus state housing policy to support a) Support continuation of the land trust for local assessment of housing needs capacity-building program and and direct additional state resources provide capital start-up funds so and the full exercise of local authority community land trusts can continue to to increase development of affordable offer gap financing, interest rate rental units and access to entry-level, write-downs, predevelopment owner-occupied housing. financing, and financial underwriting. d) Support voluntary measures to b) Support efforts by the Minnesota encourage cities to adopt and carry Community Land Trust Coalition and out land-use plans, activities, and other housing preservation subdivision regulations aimed at stakeholders to develop property tax providing for construction and valuation modifications to lower marketing of housing where a portion property taxes for qualifying low- of all new units are affordable to income sales-price-restricted lower-income households. properties enrolled in CLT programs including expanding 4d Low-Income LE-16. Community Land Trusts Rental Classification eligibility to include CLT properties and providing Issue: The increasing price of land available additional tax relief for qualified low- for housing development,particularly for income CLT property owners by way retaining affordability of housing for lower- of market value exclusion or other income households, is a concern throughout general property tax assistance. the state. Creating more permanently affordable, owner-occupied housing depends LE-17. Telecommunications and heavily on maximizing the cost- Information Technology effectiveness of taxpayer investments. The Legislature has previously appropriated Issue: Telecommunications and information funding and granted the Minnesota Housing technology is essential public infrastructure Finance Agency authority to assist cities for the efficient, equitable, and affordable with funding community land trusts (CLTs) delivery of local government services to for affordable housing. residents and businesses. Telecommunications includes voice, video, data, and services delivered over cable, 92 telephone, fiber-optic, wireless, and all other affordability for residents, schools and platforms. businesses through a variety of models, including municipal broadband and public- Response: The League of Minnesota private partnerships. However, attempts Cities supports a balanced approach to have been made to restrict cities from telecommunications policy that allows providing telecommunications services, new technologies to flourish while particularly in unserved or underserved preserving local regulatory authority. areas. Past court cases have overturned Regulations and oversight of interpretation by the Federal telecommunications services are Communications Commission(FCC)that important prerogatives for local states may not limit the extension of government to advance and balance municipal broadband services from one city community interests, including ensuring to another. public safety, ensuring equitable access, maintaining high quality basic services Due to the high costs of broadband that meet local needs, spurring economic infrastructure, the state continues to expand development, and providing affordable its role to identify and formulate tools and rates to all consumers. Policies should provide resources to expand broadband strengthen and not diminish local access. The Office of Broadband authority to manage public rights-of-way Development within the Department of including public and private Employment and Economic Development infrastructure, to zone, to collect (DEED)has developed a strong partnership reimbursement of costs and reasonable through its efforts on broadband compensation for the use of public assets, infrastructure deployment and digital or to work cooperatively with the private inclusion between the state, local sector. The League opposes the adoption communities, and broadband providers to of state and federal policies that restrict deploy high-speed Internet in unserved and cities' ability to finance, construct, and underserved areas. The Office supports operate telecommunications networks. broadband expansion through broadband mapping and managing the state's Border- LE-18. Broadband to-Border Broadband grant program, which is funded by state general fund Issue: High-speed Internet is essential appropriations and more recently funds infrastructure needed by cities to compete in authorized by the federal government for a global economy. Yet many communities broadband deployment. In addition to the do not have access to broadband at state's focus on extending broadband to affordable prices. High fixed costs, low unserved areas, Minnesota must also be on density, and short-term return-on-investment the cutting edge for next-generation thresholds for private sector providers broadband investments and ensuring that contribute to the lack of broadband across Minnesota's statutory speed goals in Minn. the state. Investing in universal broadband Stat. § 237.012 are updated to reflect access has substantial local and regional emerging technologies and broadband use economic benefits for communities of all trends. It is also critical that the state sizes. Cities and other local units of maintain funding for broadband government are facilitating the deployment infrastructure deployment as a priority to of broadband services to increase address the state's statutory speed goals and connectivity, reliability, availability, and not become dependent on federal funding. 93 The COVID-19 pandemic laid bare the supermajority voter approval for critical importance of reliable access to the provision of local phone service broadband internet both for governments by a local unit of government; that had to quickly adjust to provide services online while Minnesotans were forced to e) Offer incentives to private sector learn, work, and receive healthcare online. service providers to respond to While certain populations in Minnesota local or regional needs and to were well prepared to make the adjustment collaborate with cities and other to receive services, work, and learn online, public entities to deploy many were not due to the digital divide that broadband infrastructure capable remains. of delivering sufficient bandwidth and capacity to meet immediate Response: To promote economic and future local needs; development, education and achieve state broadband goals, the Legislature, f) Adopt policies which seek to Governor's office, and state agencies position Minnesota as a state of should: choice for testing next-generation broadband technologies; a) Identify and implement actions for the state to reach and maintain a g) Affirm that cities have the position in the top five states for authority to partner with private broadband speed that is entities to finance broadband universally accessible to residents infrastructure using city bonding and businesses; authority; b) Make significant investments to h) Remove barriers that limit the the Border-to-Border Broadband ability for the state to deploy Grant Program and continue to Border-to-Border Broadband encourage public/private sector grant funds in areas that may be collaboration including options served by existing or future federal that use technologies such as broadband programs and those wireless while remaining that restrict anti-competitive consistent with the League's Right- practices, and prevent predatory of-Way Management policy to action that prevent or impede cost-effectively expand broadband cities, municipal utilities, schools, service access; libraries, and other public sector entities from collaborating and c) Support measures to authorize deploying broadband and encourage cities and other infrastructure and services at the local units of government to play a local and regional level; direct role in providing broadband infrastructure and/or services; i) Supporting funding and efforts to continuously update and verify d) Remove barriers to the exercise of comprehensive statewide street- local authority to provide such level mapping of broadband services, including repeal of Minn. services to identify underserved Stat. § 237.19, that requires a areas and connectivity issues; 94 j) Discuss how well the FCC and funding in areas that receive federal state broadband maps document broadband assistance if those areas could actual broadband coverage across also benefit from state funding. Minnesota including wireless options. These maps are used by LE-19. Competitive Cable funders to determine grant Franchising Authority program eligibility making overstatement of available services Issue: Despite claims made by some in the highly consequential with negative cable industry, studies and evidence to date impacts for rural places; do not support that state franchising is the solution for competition, lower consumer k) Recognize the crucial role of local rates, and improved customer service. government in the work of the Unlike the exercise of local franchising Governor's Broadband Task authority, state franchising models Force and fund the Office of frequently make no provision for staffing at Broadband Development(OBD) the state level or for effective resolution of and ensure base budgets consumer complaints. supporting OBD remain at levels sufficient for it to meet its Cable service provided by a cable statutory mandates; communications system that uses infrastructure located in the public right-of- 1) Support the creation of an OBD way to transmit video signals remains operating fund to advance and subject to local franchising authority. promote programs and projects Maintaining local franchising most that improve broadband adoption, effectively creates and preserves agreements hold internet service providers that guarantee broad access to services receiving funding accountable, throughout the community, ensuring there is achieve significantly higher no digital divide for access to available broadband speeds, and support additional services such as access to IP efforts to improve digital inclusion voice and high-speed Internet via by ensuring that robust, infrastructure that also delivers video sustainable, and affordable programming services. internet connectivity is widely available and affordable to all Response: State policy should maintain Minnesotans; local cable franchise authority and oversight of the public rights-of-way, as On the federal level, the League urges well as ensure franchise agreements Congress to adopt laws restoring the reflect new technology, and are ability of municipalities to extend beyond reasonably tailored to the technical and their borders to serve unserved and operational differences among providers underserved areas. The League also urges and communities. Independent studies Congress and the Federal clearly demonstrate that statewide Communications Commission to franchising does not increase direct structure federal broadband grant competition to incumbent cable programs to work in conjunction with the franchisees.And it subsequently has not state's Border-to-Border Broadband lowered rates and does not improve grant program and not prohibit state customer service. 95 The Legislature, Federal operators for public safety Communications Commission (FCC), and communications, libraries, schools, Congress should also continue to and other public institutions to use recognize, support and maintain the state-of-the-art network applications; exercise of local franchising authority to and encourage increased competition between incumbent cable system operators and e) Strengthening local authority to new wireline competitive video service enforce customer service standards providers including: and transparency in pricing. a) Maintaining provisions in Minn. Stat. LE-20. Public Right-of-Way Ch. 238 that establish and uphold Management local franchising authority, including the authority to receive a franchise fee Issue: Cities hold local rights-of-way in based on gross revenues irrespective trust for the public as an increasingly scarce of any in-kind contributions; and valuable asset. As demand increases for use of public rights-of-way (PROW), cities b) Refraining from adopting any FCC must coordinate the use of this resource rule changes that would further among competing uses and to manage the restrict existing local authority to use of the PROW for delivery of essential charge for and control access to public municipal utility services. Cities continue to rights-of-way by all video and cable experience increased demand for space in service providers; the PROW including the siting of underground wired and overhead wireless c) Maintaining local authority to charge facilities and sites for wireless fees on providers to ensure the communications. Additionally, technology provision of public, educational, located in the public right-of-way will governmental(PEG) programming, continue to support the increase of new and interactive technologies to require modes of mobility and delivery methods the provision of video channels and including Connected Autonomous Vehicles video streaming for PEG (CAV) that may also operate in the public programming with video and audio right-of-way. While local management quality/channel location equivalent to responsibilities vary and are site specific, the that of the local broadcast stations, increased demand for utilizing space in the and ensuring programming is public right-of way underscores the accessible and searchable by all necessity for maintaining local authority. residents of the local authority through detailed Electronic Minnesota's Telecommunications Right-of- Programming Guide listings and Way User Law was amended during the other navigation and distribution 2017 Session with legislation creating a technologies that are equivalent to separate permitting system for placement of that of local broadcast stations; small wireless facilities on city-owned structures in the public right-of-way. The d) Ensuring continued cost-effective local change in law clarified that wireless government access to capacity on providers are telecommunications right-of- institutional networks (I-Nets) way users and maintained cities'right-of- provided by local cable system way management authority, but limitations 96 were imposed on cities' compensation d) Maintain city authority to franchise through rent and timelines for processing gas, electric, open video systems and small wireless facilities permits. cable services, and expand city ability to collect compensation for other Response: Minn. Stat. §§ 237.162-.163 services utilizing the PROW including worked well for many years, but but not limited to telecommunications Minnesota was a part of a nationwide and broadband services, and all other effort by wireless providers to pass laws wireline programming platforms and providing them with easier access to services to support maintenance and public rights-of-way and city-owned management of the traveled portion of infrastructure. While Minnesota's law the PROW and other public services maintains more local control than those of importance to communities; passed in many other states, the League of Minnesota Cities opposes efforts to e) Encourage a collaborative process further restrict local government with stakeholders,including cities, to authority over the public right-of-way. determine any revised standards if Furthermore, the Federal needed; Communications Commission is undergoing review of f) Recognize that as rights-of-way Telecommunications Act rules and become more crowded, the costs of policies related to local government disrupting critical infrastructure regulatory authority. State and federal become evident and the exercise of policymakers and regulators should: local authority to manage competing demands and ensure public safety in a) Uphold local authority to manage and the PROWs becomes increasingly protect public rights-of-way, including important; reasonable zoning and subdivision regulation, reasonable regulations of g) Ensure the removal of abandoned structures in the public right-of-way, equipment and accompanying support and the exercise of local police structures by the service providers powers; from the public right-of-way; b) Recognize that cities have a h) Maintain the courts as the primary paramount role in developing, forum for resolving disputes over the locating, siting, and enforcing utility exercise of such authority; construction and safety standards; i) Maintain existing local authority to c) Support local authority to require review and approve or deny plans for reimbursement and compensation installation or relocation of additional from service providers for managing wires or cables on in-place utility use of public rights-of-way and ensure poles. In the alternative, cities should that local authority to receive have broader authority to require the compensation for use of public rights- underground placement of new and/or of-way is expanded to account for new existing services at the cost of the products and emerging technologies; utility or telecommunications provider; 97 j) Support the collaboration with local LE-22. County Economic units of government as the state Development Authorities explores efforts to expand infrastructure in the public right-of- Issue: The 2005 Legislature authorized all way to provide for increased counties outside the metropolitan area to connectivity for Connected establish county economic development Autonomous Vehicles (CAV). authorities (EDAs). Minn. Stat. § 469.1082 provides specificity on certain process and LE-21. Wireless Infrastructure and limitations issues, including the ability of Equipment Siting cities to prohibit the county EDA from operating within the city as well as within an Issue: Demand for wireless communication agreed-upon urban service area or within a service has increased requests by private and distance approved during the formation of public sector providers to site additional the county EDA. County EDA activity in towers, antennas, small cells and other areas surrounding cities will directly impact facilities in cities. It is anticipated that the adjacent city in terms of service applications to install small cell wireless provision and taxes. facilities and distributed antenna systems (DAS)will continue to grow as technology Response: The Legislature should require evolves over time. Despite changes made to city approval for proposed county EDA Minn. Stat. § 237.163 that created a special activities within two miles of a city. process for the siting of small wireless facilities, maintaining cities' local zoning LE-23. Local Appropriations to authority and police power to manage and Economic Development coordinate the siting of these facilities Organizations continue is necessary and appropriate. Issue: Cities and towns are allowed to Response: Cities must continue to exercise appropriate up to $50,000 per year from full authority to consider public health, general fund revenue to an incorporated safety, and welfare concerns in development society or organization for responding to requests to site, upgrade or "promoting, advertising, improving, or alter wireless facilities. The Legislature, developing the economic and agricultural Federal Communications Commission resources" of the city or town. The $50,000 (FCC), and Congress should not place cap has been in place since 1989 and places further restrictions on city authority to unnecessary restrictions on a city's ability to manage the siting of wireless facilities in work with non-profit development the public right-of-way nor enact corporations. Local governments should compensation restrictions that would have the flexibility to work with outside result in local government subsidization organizations if local elected officials of wireless providers. Furthermore, cities believe it is in the best interest of their must have recourse to require removal by communities to do so. Such appropriations the provider of equipment deemed are subject to the same budgetary oversight abandoned. as other government expenditures, and local elected officials are ultimately responsible to the voters for how local tax dollars are spent. 98 Response: The Legislature should amend programs, and employment Minn. Stat. § 469.191 to eliminate or disparities; and increase the cap on appropriations to incorporated development societies or d) Continue to support cities that organizations. provide workforce programs that are coordinated with and complement LE-24. Workforce Readiness state and regional efforts by seeking municipal approval before making Issue: Incumbent worker training and any changes to those service areas. education must be an important component of Minnesota's efforts to improve workforce LE-25. Business Development readiness. By making firms and employees Programs more competitive, incumbent worker training can increase wages, increase Issue: Programs such as the Minnesota employment opportunities, fill skilled Investment Fund(MIF), the Job Creation worker gaps, and keep jobs and employers Fund(JCF), the Redevelopment Program, in their communities. The Minnesota Job and contaminated site clean-up grants Skills Partnership is one proven tool that provide funding opportunities for provides training to thousands of incumbent communities and businesses to develop their workers each year. local and regional economies. These well- utilized programs create infrastructure, Response: The Legislature should: revitalize property, and help businesses generate and expand jobs. Cities are key a) Fully fund the Minnesota Job Skills facilitators in the implementation of Partnership and other workforce economic development strategies through training programs administered by land use and other policies. the Department of Employment and Economic Development,the Response: The League of Minnesota Department of Human Services, and Cities supports continued and sustainable the various education agencies; funding for the Minnesota Investment Fund and the Job Creation Fund to assist b) Provide additional flexible funding to local communities and businesses in local workforce councils, including creating, growing, and retaining jobs. The governments and educational Legislature should also provide dedicated facilities, for the purpose of upgrading and sustainable funding for the the skills and productivity of the Redevelopment Grant and Demolition workforce, and pursue additional Loan Program. creative programming and funding to prepare and place underemployed DEED should solicit input from cities and unemployed Minnesotans, as well about how best to implement the Fund, as address the issue of those phasing and make adjustments to the out of the workplace and retiring; administration of the program as necessary. The League supports c) Provide additional funding for Department of Employment and programs specifically designed to Economic Development(DEED) studying address youth employment such as and making recommendations on career and workforce readiness methods to improve the geographic 99 balance of recipients, by allowing the use account. The League of Minnesota Cities of additional evaluation criteria beyond also supports the creation of a land the current job creation goal such as assembly grant or loan program to assist providing higher-wage jobs or achieving cities and economic development racial equity policy goals. that would authorities with the challenge of allow all regions of the state to better assembling small parcels for prosper. redevelopment. The League supports competitive programs administered by LE-26. Remediation and DEED that distribute the funds equitably Redevelopment between greater Minnesota and the metro area. The Legislature should continue its Issue: Communities across Minnesota are support and increase funding levels for faced with expensive barriers to re-using state and regional programs to assist in property. These roadblocks include contamination cleanup and brownfields deteriorating, obsolete, and vacant remediation efforts. structures, and contaminated land. The State should recognize that the Larger scale redevelopment projects often rehabilitation of land due to obsolescence require the purchase and assembly of or incompatible land uses is a component multiple, smaller parcels of land that are not of redevelopment. The Legislature should suitable for development on their own. amend the definition of redevelopment Cities and development authorities may district in Minn. Stat. § 469.174, subd. 10, need to purchase land over a period of years to include the obsolescence and and hold them for later development, incompatible land uses included in a reducing the effectiveness of traditional renewal and renovation district(Minn. financing tools that require immediate Stat. § 469.174, subd. 10a), thereby development. providing cities with more flexible tools to address land remediation and Such barriers pose significant problems for redevelopment. cities seeking to re-use existing infrastructure, maintain and improve The Legislature should also revive a property tax base,provide jobs and housing program similar to "This Old Shop" opportunities, and preserve historic (Minn. Stat. § 273.11, subd. 19),which structures. Land remediation activities are would allow cities greater flexibility in particularly costly because significant targeting commercial development and remediation must occur before private-sector redevelopment. The Legislature should interest can be generated. Exacerbating this consider enacting authority that would situation, the land remediation programs provide a tax deferral on improvements administered by the Department of to commercial buildings,including those Employment and Economic Development located in designated rehabilitation or (DEED) and the Metropolitan Council historic preservation districts. The programs continue to be underfunded. program's age limit qualifications under Minn. Stat§ 273.11, subd. 19, should be Response: In recognition of the unique modified to include properties that are at needs of land remediation projects least 30 years old. statewide, the Legislature should increase funding for the statewide redevelopment 100 The League is supportive of recent effective and will hinder local efforts to extensions to the Minnesota Historic support job creation, housing, Structure Tax Credit in Minn. Stat. § redevelopment and remediation. 116J.8737,which provides a 20 percent tax rebate for rehabilitation of qualified The need for flexibility has been accentuated historic buildings. However,the due to the pandemic economic downturn Legislature should eliminate the sunset which has dramatically slowed existing provision of the tax credit to provide projects that must continue to comply with certainty to cities and their project statutory timelines. Many projects will have developer partners to proceed with difficulty meeting time-line requirements historic redevelopment projects that are such as the five-year rule without special complex and time consuming. legislation authorization. LE-27. Development Authority Further restrictions of TIF would render the Levy Limits tool less effective and will hinder local efforts to support job creation, housing, Issue:Under Minn. Stat. § 469.107, § redevelopment and remediation. 469.033, and § 469.053, Economic Development Authorities (EDAs), Housing Response: The Legislature should not and Redevelopment Authorities (HRAs) and enact future TIF law restrictions, rather port authority levies for economic the Legislature should: development activities are capped. These a) Amend Minn. Stat. § 469.1763, subd. limits can hinder the planning of future 4,to clarify that tax increment pooling development. limitations are calculated on a Response: The Legislature should cumulative basis. increase or repeal levy limits or increase b) Modify Minn. Stat. 469.174, subd. 10, the levying authority for EDA, HRA, and to allow a redevelopment district to be port authority activities in Minn. Stat. ch. established where only 50 percent of 469. the buildings are required to be structurally substandard to a degree LE-28. Tax Increment Financing requiring substantial renovation or (TIF) clearance. Issue: TIF is the most important tool c) Clarify that expenditures for the available to fund community development necessary maintenance of properties and redevelopment efforts. Over time, the within TIF districts are an allowable TIF law has become increasingly complex use of tax increment under Minn. Stat. as the Legislature seeks to provide cities § 469.176, subd. 4; with the resources to grow the state's economy while maintaining limits on the use d) Allow term extensions for of property taxes. Cities need greater redevelopment districts which are flexibility to use TIF for community and taking longer to develop; economic development that support a city's residents and businesses. Further e) Amend Minn. Stat. § 469.1763, subd. restrictions of TIF would render the tool less 3,to eliminate the "Five-year Rule" 101 for districts that are taking longer to development authority to delegate to a develop; staff person the ability to set the terms and conditions of an interfund loan. f) Amend Minn. Stat. § 469.174, subd. 25, to provide time limits on the n) Amend the definition of "deemed increment" created by land redevelopment district under the TIF sales, leases and loans, and allow Act to include the obsolescence and authorities greater flexibility in the incompatible land uses included in a use of lease revenues to fund ongoing renewal and renovation district, operations; thereby providing cities with more flexible tools to address land g) Expand the use of TIF to assist in the remediation and redevelopment. development of technological infrastructure and products, o) Amend Minn. Stat. 469.1763 subd. 2 biotechnology, research, multi-modal to provide development authorities transportation and transit-oriented greater flexibility to address local development, restoration of housing needs by removing section 42 designated historic structures, non- requirement for housing projects retail commercial projects, and non- outside the district. wetland areas where unstable/non- buildable soils exist; p) Amend Minn. Stat. 469.174 subd. 27 to define "small city" to be a city that h) Increase the ability of TIF to facilitate has a population of 5,000 or less and is redevelopment and housing activities; located 5 miles or more from another city with a population of 10,000 which i) Modify the housing district income will allow qualifying cities to to utilize qualification level requirements to economic development TIF districts allow the levels to vary according to for commercial developments. individual communities; LE-29. Property Tax Abatement j) Encourage compact development and Authority consider reauthorization of compact development TIF districts with Issue: Although tax increment financing modifications to increase their (TIF) continues to be the primary financing effectiveness; mechanism for local development projects, k) Discourage any statutory mechanisms tax abatements provide cities with an that directly or indirectly decrease the important, additional economic development impact of city redevelopment and tool. Recognizing the need for municipal economic development projects; development tools, the 2008 Legislature expanded the abatement authority by 1) Simplify the substandard building test converting the limit on abatements from ten to resolve ambiguities and reduce the percent of the current tax levy to ten percent continued threats of litigation; of net tax capacity. m) Create an exception to the interfund The tax abatement law requires that a loan resolution requirement in Minn. political subdivision may only approve an Stat. 469.178, subd. 7, to authorize the abatement after holding a public meeting 102 with a minimum of 10 days published public LE-30. Opportunity Zones notice. When more than one political subdivision abates property taxes for a Issue: The Opportunity Zones program was development project, there must be separate established by Congress in the Tax Cuts and notices and hearings for each subdivision. Jobs Act of 2017 to encourage long-term This requirement can be particularly investments in low-income urban and rural burdensome for programs designed to communities nationwide. The Opportunity develop multiple properties over an Zones program provides a tax incentive for extended period of time. If one political investors to re-invest their unrealized capital subdivision could be designated as the lead gains into Opportunity Funds that are entity for purposes of the notice and hearing dedicated to investing into Opportunity requirements, such projects could be made Zones as designated by the chief executives more efficient without sacrificing public of every state and territory in the United transparency. States. The tax incentive is available for up to ten years. Property tax abatements should not be considered a replacement for TIF. As the chief executive of the state of Minnesota, Governor Mark Dayton Response: In light of current economic designated 128 census tracts across the state conditions existing property tax as Opportunity Zones,but beyond the abatement authority should be responsibility for this designation the state strengthened. The Legislature should: does not have an additional role in the implementation of the Act. The United a) Expand the abatement authority to States Treasury released rules on April 17, allow abatement revenues to be used 2019 which provide guidance and for economic development activities clarification for investors and fund such as workforce readiness and managers. In some communities, the Act has assistance programs, and technology served as a useful tool in spurring infrastructure improvements; development in low-income communities b) Develop a state fund to facilitate state and could help with business development participation in abatement projects by and jobs; there are also questions about what impact the Act will have on the residents allowing the state property tax to be that live and businesses that operate, in these abated; communities today. For example, while c) Increase funding caps under Minn. development may have positive impacts Stat. § 469.1813, subd. 8 and duration such as increasing tax base or job limits under Minn. Stat. § 469.1813, opportunities, robust development could subd. 6; and have unintended consequences such as displacement of current residents and d) Amend Minn. Stat. § 469.1813, subd. businesses. While the program provides 5,to create a streamlined notice and investors with several benefits including the hearing requirement for multi- deferment of capital gains owed until 2026, jurisdictional tax abatement projects. key tax incentives have begun to wane as we get closer to 2027 and investor attention has shifted to focusing on executing projects that have already received investment. 103 Response: The League of Minnesota noncompliance notices to TIF authorities. In Cities urges the federal government to recent years, a number of cities have seek regular input from communities that received letters of inquiry from the OSA that are designated as Opportunity Zones raise questions about practices long accepted regarding how the tool is being used, by the OSA or limit statutory definitions that whether the tool is encouraging new have not been amended by the legislature for development opportunities, and how over a decade. The audit power in Minn. community members who live in the Stat. § 469.1771 is necessary to ensure that Zones are impacted, such as through a individual cities comply with the TIF local advisory board made up of statutes, but is not effective in clarifying the residents, businesses, and other legislative intent of the TIF statutes. stakeholders located in the designated census tracts. The Federal Government In addition, the TIF statute requires that should seek input from local communities authorities respond to noncompliance throughout the implementation of the notices within 60-days of receiving the rules and regulations and consider notification. There is no deadline for the necessary amendments and adjustments OSA to respond, and authorities often do not as needed in response to potential receive timely responses on the matter from questions or concerns raised by the the OSA. Government agencies typically communities whose residents,workers, have response-time deadlines, and it is and businesses will be experiencing the appropriate for the OSA to respond by a changes that ensue in the Zones. time certain to provide finality to the audit Additionally,limitations that may have process. Any final disposition notice must led to lack of engagement from be clear about the final disposition of the communities and investors in the matter. Qualified Opportunity Zones should be addressed by the federal government if Finally, the statutory audit enforcement the program is to be reauthorized beyond process does not create an environment 2027. where these policy questions can be fairly and sufficiently resolved. County attorneys The State of Minnesota should continue lack the resources to prioritize TIF disputes to utilize community development and lack the subject matter expertise needed resources to stimulate investment in to analyze the merits of the OSA's audit Opportunity Zones and adopt policies findings. This results in excessive deference that ensure that local residents,workers granted to the OSA's original audit findings. and businesses benefit from the Faced with the potential loss of increment, investments. payment of attorney fees, and small likelihood of success on the merits, cities LE-31. Revisions to the OSA Audit often acquiesce to the OSA to save time and Function money. Issue: Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 469.1771, Response: The League of Minnesota the Office of the State Auditor(OSA) is Cities believes there should be a more responsible for tax increment financing defined process to establish rules or (TIF) oversight. As part of its review of TIF guidelines for TIF authorities with districts, the OSA identifies alleged adequate input from local government violations of the TIF laws and issues 104 officials and public finance professionals expend staff resources to maintain files and prior to their adoption. a working knowledge of old districts for an unreasonable period of time. In the event that the OSA determines to issue a final noncompliance notice to a Response:A reasonable timeframe within TIF authority,the Legislature should which alleged violations are identified require the OSA to issue the notice within should be established. The Legislature 60 days of receiving the authority's should reasonably restrict the OSA's response. Any final noncompliance notice ability to issue noncompliance notices to should contain the OSA's final position the six-year period prior to the notice's on the matter, the date upon which it issuance date. The Legislature should also forwarded the matter to the county require the OSA to conduct any audits on attorney, and the next steps that are decertified districts within one year of required to be taken according to state decertification. law. Upon expiration of the 60-day period,the authority should be deemed to LE-33. Workforce Housing be in compliance with the TIF laws if no final noncompliance notice is received. Issue: Job creation is one of the fundamental goals of economic In order to ensure a fair process to development. When employers create new resolve disputes over TIF findings of the jobs through expansion or relocation there OSA,the Legislature should consider must be sufficient housing in the host whether the authority to resolve such community for the new workers and their disputes should be shifted from county families to live. In rural communities, a lack attorneys to the Office of Administrative of housing stock for new workers can Hearings. prevent a planned expansion or relocation, hampering job growth and economic LE-32. OSA Time Limitations development. The economics of building a housing development in greater Minnesota Issue: The Office of the State Auditor communities makes private development (OSA) has the authority to issue difficult, and workers with higher paying noncompliance notices for every existing tax jobs do not qualify for traditional affordable increment financing (TIF) district in the housing. This housing gap can bring state for alleged violations of the TIF laws. development and job growth in a community This authority extends retroactively to the to a halt. inception of the district. Accordingly, TIF authorities can receive noncompliance In 2014, at the urging of cities through notices for alleged violations that occurred Minnesota, the Legislature created a 20 or more years ago. Often, staff and workforce housing pilot program for three record-keeping procedures have changed, cities in Roseau and Pennington Counties. In and TIF authorities find it difficult to 2015 the Legislature passed League- reconstruct the past in order to identify and sponsored legislation that created the remedy these situations. Similarly, the OSA workforce housing development program claims the authority,based on the state's and appropriated$4 million to the records retention schedule, to audit TIF Department of Employment and Economic districts for up to 10 years after Development (DEED)to administer the decertification, which requires cities to program. Once grant awards from DEED 105 were made, prevailing wage requirements, government entities about proposed TIF construction costs, and land prices have districts. shown to lessen the effectiveness of creating more workforce housing units. It is Response: The League of Minnesota important to ensure the appropriate Cities supports additional tools for local resources and process exist for the communities to develop workforce Department of Labor and Industry (DLI)to housing: determine representative and accurate prevailing wage amounts in different areas a) MHFA should solicit input from local across the state. communities to ensure that the goals of the Workforce Housing The 2017 Legislature approved funding for Development Program are met, and the Workforce Housing Grant Program at $2 MHFA should award funds to eligible million each year. The program was moved projects as quickly and efficiently as from DEED to be administered by MN possible; Housing Finance Agency(MHFA) in Minn. Stat. 469A.39 with a change in b) The Legislature should increase qualifications that gives preference to cities funding to the Economic Development under 30,000 population (rather than 18,000 and Housing Challenge Program to previously). aid housing in support of job growth, and amend Minn. Stat. § 462A.33 to The 2017 Legislature also approved a new either increase or eliminate the use of TIF authority for workforce housing maximum income levels for (Minn. Stat. § 469.174-176). In addition to participation in the program; and requirements under Minn. State. 469.175, subd. 3, county and school boards must c) The Minnesota Housing Finance approve the TIF plan before it is enacted and Agency should make administrative the authority sunsets in 2027. These changes to the Economic Development additional requirements specific to and Housing Challenge Grant workforce housing TIF districts put program to streamline the application additional barriers on workforce housing process, reduce the per-unit cost of development and does not fully recognize constructing affordable housing, and the role of cities as the typical lead increase the construction of affordable government entity on housing projects. rental units at 80% of median income Minn. Stat. § 469.175, subd. 2, currently and owner-occupied units at 115% of requires cities to provide the county auditor median income, as currently allowed and clerk of the school board with the by state and federal law; and proposed TIF plan and an estimate of the fiscal and economic implications of the d) The Legislature should pass proposed TIF district at least 30 days before legislation creating a workforce the public hearing required by Minn. Stat. § housing tax credit to spur 469.175, subd. 3. The county auditor and development of workforce housing. school board shall provide copies of these e) The Legislature should scale the TIF plan materials to members of their Workforce Housing Development boards. These current requirements provide Program to account for the additional sufficient notice to taxpayers and other 106 cost associated with the prevailing discharging and transporting of people. The wage requirements. commissioner of DEED may designate a Transit Improvement Area if it will increase f) The Legislature should streamline the the effectiveness of a mass transit project by provisions in Minn. Stat. § 469.175, incorporating one or more modes of public subd. 3 required of cities to establish a transportation with commercial and housing workforce housing TIF district development, as well as providing a clean including eliminating the provision and pleasant place for pedestrian use. DEED that requires a city to determine has designated over 50 Transit Improvement average vacancy rates and county Areas; all but two are located in the seven- board and school board approval for county metropolitan area. Although the a workforce housing TIF plan before language passed and was signed into law by it is enacted and the Legislature the governor(Minn. Stat. § 469.35), there should also eliminate the sunset of the was no funding put into place to implement workforce housing TIF authority. the new program. LE-34. Development Along Transit Response: The League of Minnesota Corridors Cities urges the Legislature to increase the ability of traditional economic Issue:While the establishment of transit development tools,including tax lines and corridors provide the impetus for increment financing, tax abatement, and economic development, there are limits to special service districts, to address the existing development tools that hinder full needs of transit-oriented development. development of transit corridors. For The League encourages the Legislature to example, acquisition of land outside of the appropriate bonding and general fund line but within the corridor can be difficult, dollars for revolving loans and grants to and current tools are not well-suited for the fund the TIA program. Additionally,the creation of public spaces, enhancement of Legislature should consider adding park infrastructure, and investments such as and ride facilities to the list of qualifying parking ramps that are necessary transportation modes, as defined in Minn. components of a transit-oriented Stat. § 469.351. Because the majority of development plan. the DEED-designated Transit Improvement Areas are currently located In 2008 the Department of Employment and in the seven-county metropolitan area, Economic Development(DEED)was increased funding for this program will authorized to establish Transit Improvement not be balanced between greater Areas, which should complement long-term Minnesota and the metro area. Additional transportation planning initiatives such as funding for this program should not MAP-21 and Minnesota GO. Transit change the overall balance of state Improvement Areas include parcels of land funding between greater Minnesota and that are located in part within one-half mile the seven-county metropolitan area. of a transit station. A transit station is defined as a physical structure or designated LE-35. Authority to Create Public area which supports the interconnection of Infrastructure Utilities various transportation modes, including light rail, commuter rail and bus rapid transit, and Issue: Successful economic development which promotes and achieves the loading, efforts and community stability are 107 dependent upon a city's ability to make in Minn. Stat. § 429.101, cities should be infrastructure investments. Current able to impose service charges against infrastructure funding options available to property to ensure the maintenance and cities are inadequate and unsustainable. safety of the right of way for all Funding pressures have been exacerbated by Minnesotans without having to prove an levy limits,unallotment and reductions in increase in fair market value or having to the local government aid and market value determine whether those contributing to homestead credit programs. The existing the utility fund are taxable or tax-exempt. special assessment law, Minn. Stat. ch. 429, Such authority would acknowledge the does not meet cities' financing needs effects of repeated levy limits and the because of the special benefit requirement. general funding shift from the state to The law also requires a bond election unless local governments for building and a minimum of 20 percent of such a project maintaining necessary infrastructure; the can be specially assessed against affected benefits to all taxpayers of a properly properties due to the increase in fair market maintained public infrastructure; and, value or"benefit" from the project. In the limitations of existing special practice, however,proof of increased assessment authority. property value to this degree of benefit can rarely be proven from regular repair or LE-36. Adequate Funding for replacement of existing infrastructure such Transportation as streets or sidewalks. Alternatives to the Minn. Stat. ch. 429 methods for financing Issue:A well-coordinated state infrastructure improvements are nearly transportation policy utilizing all modes of nonexistent. transportation in moving passengers and freight will enhance the state economic The Legislature has given cities the development of new and expanding business authority to operate utilities for waterworks, as well as foster additional tourism sanitary sewers, and storm sewers. The opportunities. storm sewer authority, established in 1983, set the precedent for a workable process of Response: More resources must be charging a use fee on a utility bill for a city dedicated to all components of the state's service infrastructure that is of value to transportation system, and local units of everyone in a city. Similar to the storm government must have access to resources sewer authority, a transportation or sidewalk and funding tools to meet growing needs. utility would use technical, well-founded The League of Minnesota Cities supports: measurements and would equitably distribute the costs of local infrastructure a) Development of a comprehensive state services. transportation policy which provides an environment where all modes of Response: The Legislature should transportation (motor, rail, air,water authorize cities to create, as a local and pipeline) complement each other option, additional utilities such as a in moving passengers and freight transportation or sidewalk utility, that within the state. ensure funding for the maintenance of these public amenities.Additionally, b) A dedicated and sustainable state whether established as a new chapter of revenue source for non-municipal law or added to the list of service charges state aid city streets. 108 c) The Statewide Transportation Plan related stormwater management 2009-2028 developed by the Minnesota systems, through state sources. Department of Transportation (MnDOT). n) Establishment of a "Mainstreets Fund" to assist cities with pon- d) MVST distribution of 60 percent for transportation related components of roads and bridges and 40 percent for trunk highway projects such as utility transit. upgrades and improvements that contribute to economic development. e) A permanent increase in the gas tax. o) Funding to build roads to standards f) Indexing of the gas tax, provided there that can accommodate the year-round is a limit on how much the tax can be transport of heavy loads. increased for inflation in a given amount of time. p) A sales tax exemption for materials purchased for state and local road, g) Increases in vehicle registration taxes bridge, sidewalk, trail and transit (tab fees). construction projects. h) Trunk highway bonding provided the q) Authority for cities to impose Legislature implements reasonable development impact fees for restrictions on the amount of debt transportation infrastructure. service the state will incur, and provided the Legislature appropriates r) Local funding options that would funding to assist with local costs allow cities to raise revenues for related to projects funded with trunk roads, bridges, sidewalks, trails, and highway bonds. transit. i) General obligation bonding for local s) Expanded use of alternative revenue roads and bridges, particularly for sources such as MnPASS and other routes of regional significance. tolling mechanisms for funding of maintenance and construction (where j) A sales tax increase dedicated to feasibility studies indicate the transportation. program is appropriate). k) Funding to assist cities burdened by LE-37. Turnbacks of County and cost participation responsibilities State Roads imposed by improvement projects on the state's principal arterial system Issue: As road funding becomes and on the county state aid highway increasingly inadequate, more roads are (CSAH) system. being "turned back" to cities from counties I) Funding for transportation and the state. components of economic development Response: Turnbacks should not occur and redevelopment projects. without direct funding or transfer of a m) Full funding for all components of funding source. A process of negotiation state highway projects, including and mediation should govern the timing, 109 funding, and condition of turned-back safety concerns,undermined efforts to keep roads.Agreements should be negotiated corridors attractive and presented challenges and finalized before work on a project for communities working to promote requiring a turnback begins. City economic development. taxpayers should receive the same treatment as township taxpayers. The Response: MnDOT must maintain state requirement for a public hearing, rights-of-way and parcels acquired by standards about the conditions of MnDOT for transportation purposes turnbacks, and temporary maintenance located within city limits in a manner funding should also apply to county consistent with local ordinances turnbacks to cities.At a minimum, roads governing the upkeep of private property that are proposed to be turned back to a when requested by the city. Alternatively, city government should be brought up to MnDOT should reimburse Minnesota the standards of the receiving cities for the labor, supplies, and government, or that city should be equipment necessary to maintain state compensated with a direct payment. rights-of-way to meet city standards Direct funding should be provided for and/or minimize public safety hazards. smaller cities that are not provided with The Legislature must provide MnDOT turnback financing through the with adequate funds to maintain state municipal state aid system. rights-of-way. LE-38. MnDOT Rights-of-Way LE-39. Funding for Non-Municipal Maintenance State Aid City Streets Issue: Maintenance of property, including Issue: Minnesota has over 141,000 miles of government property and facilities, is roadway, and more than 22,500 miles—or important to public safety and to the image 16 percent--are owned and maintained by of Minnesota cities. Cities are acutely aware Minnesota's 853 cities. of the responsibility they have for enforcing property maintenance codes pertaining to The Minnesota Constitution limits eligibility grass mowing, noxious weed abatement, the for dedicated Highway User Tax placement of trash in yards and fence Distribution Fund dollars to up to twenty maintenance. percent of streets in cities with populations over 5,000 (147 of 853 cities). This means Minnesota has many miles of highways that almost 85 percent of municipal streets are run through cities. In recent years, the ineligible for municipal state aid(MSA) Minnesota Department of Transportation funds and must be paid for with property (MnDOT)has cut a substantial percentage taxes and special assessments. Funding of its rights-of-way management staff. The challenges are compounded by city cost cuts have resulted in reduced maintenance participation requirements in state and along some corridors and on parcels county highway projects, which divert acquired by MnDOT for transportation resources from city-owned streets. purposes. Specifically, MnDOT has reduced the frequency of mowing, litter collection, Recognizing the unique street funding needs noxious weed abatement, graffiti abatement in cities under 5,000 population, the 2015 and repair of fences and guard rails. This legislature created the Small Cities maintenance reduction has created public Assistance Account(Minn. Stat. § 162.145). 110 Funds in the account are distributed through c) the creation of a new fund within the a formula to all cities under 5,000 Local Road Improvement Program population for street maintenance and that would provide grants to cities reconstruction. Unfortunately, funding for burdened by cost participation the account has only been provided for three requirements related to trunk times. Because Small Cities Assistance highway and county state-aid projects. funding has been provided so inconsistently, small cities have had difficulty using the LE-40. Authority to Allow revenue stream as a tool to maximize Amenities in MnDOT Rights-of- pavement management and street Way improvement planning. Issue: Cities served by the state's trunk Maintenance costs increase as road systems highway system frequently request features age, and no city--large or small—is on the highway right-of-way (ROW) that spending enough on roadway capital would improve the aesthetics of the highway improvements to maintain a 50-year or provide public amenities exceeding lifecycle. For every one dollar spent on components the Minnesota Dept. of maintenance, a road authority--and therefore Transportation(MnDOT) may include. taxpayers--save seven dollars in repairs. Minn. Stat. §161.20, Subd. 2(b), gives the According to a report released in late 2012 MnDOT commissioner authority to make by the governor's Transportation Finance agreements with and cooperate with any Advisory Committee, cities collectively governmental authority relating to trunk need an additional $400 million per year to highway construction and improvements; bring city streets up to an economically however, Minn. Stat. §161.434 provides that competitive standard. arrangements and agreements must be "for Response: City streets are a separate but highway purposes". integral piece of the network of roads These restrictions are problematic in cities supporting movement of people and where a downtown commercial area exists goods. Cities need greater resources and along a trunk highway. Some of these cities flexible policies in order to meet growing desire amenities that would make demands for street improvements and commercial areas adjacent to trunk maintenance. The League of Minnesota highways more vibrant by allowing outdoor Cities supports: dining, landscaping, decorative lighting or a) A dedicated and sustainable state other aesthetic improvements that do not funding source for non-MSA city serve a highway purpose. Under current law, streets in large and small cities the city cannot approve amenities that statewide; encroach on the ROW. b) enabling legislation that would allow Response: The League of Minnesota cities to create street improvement Cities supports authorizing cities, by districts (similar to sidewalk ordinance,to allow amenities that do not improvement districts already allowed serve highway purposes on trunk under Minn. Stat. § 435.44); and highway ROW within their jurisdictions. The League also supports a requirement 111 that MnDOT develop and approve rules under-utilization of existing infrastructure. related to local ordinances. Consequently, local communities are exploring methods to ensure new LE-41. Complete Streets development pays its fair share of the true costs of growth. Issue: There is increasing public support for the reform of local street design policies to In Harstad v. City of Woodbury, 916 make streets safer for pedestrians, cyclists N.W.2d 540 (Minn. 2018), the Minnesota and neighborhood residents. Supreme Court recently clarified that state statute does not provide the authority for Response: The League of Minnesota cities to impose infrastructure fees to fund Cities supports reforms in state design future road improvements when approving guidelines for local streets that would give subdivision applications under Minn. Stat. § cities greater flexibility to safely 462.358, subd. 2a. Given the existing accommodate all modes of travel, authorization to impose fees on new including walking and biking. The state development of other infrastructure, such as should also provide incentives such as water, sanitary and storm sewer, and for grants to local units of government park purposes, it is reasonable to extend the working to advance complete street concept to additional public infrastructure projects. Crosswalks and Safe Routes to and facilities improvement also necessitated School projects should be eligible for by new development. incentives. Response: The Legislature should The League opposes state imposed authorize local units of government to unfunded mandates that would increase impose infrastructure fees so new the costs of building streets in contexts development pays its fair share of the off- where facilities for cyclists and site, as well as the on-site, costs of public pedestrians are unnecessary or infrastructure and other public facilities inappropriate. needed to adequately serve new development. LE-42. Authority to Implement Infrastructure Fees LE-43. Safe Routes to School Grants Management Issue:New development and the resulting growth create an increased demand for Issue: The Safe Routes to School (SRTS) public infrastructure and other public Program provides funding support for facilities. Severe constraints on local fiscal capital projects that promote and encourage resources and dramatic forecasts for more students to walk or bicycle to school population growth have prompted cities to by making the school routes safer and more reconsider ways to pay for the inevitable accessible. costs associated with new development. The following are some types of SRTS Traditional financing methods tend to infrastructure improvement grants that are subsidize new development at the expense provided by the state and offered through of the existing community, discourage sound the Minnesota Dept. of Transportation land-use planning, place inefficient (MnDOT): pressures on public facilities, and allow 112 a) School site improvements: secure increased due to frac sand and crude oil bicycle parking facilities, traffic entering the state by rail to and from North diversion improvements, and Americans Dakota. While railroads often support with Disabilities Act (ADA) economic activity and can relieve pressure improvements; on roadway and bridge infrastructure, they also bring noise, environmental impacts and b) Pedestrian facilities: new sidewalk, safety challenges. Below are some of the sidewalk gap closures, and related ADA concerns cities have raised about railroads: improvements; a) Local public safety personnel are c) Bicycle facilities: bicycle trails, underequipped to respond to a potential separated multi-use or shared paths and derailment of a train carrying hazardous related ADA improvements; and materials such as crude oil or nuclear products. d) Traffic calming and crossing improvements: curb extensions, speed b) The cost-share ratio related to roadway humps, median refuges, enhanced crossing improvements is borne crosswalk markings, timed on/off disproportionately by the public sector. beacons, vehicle feedback signs Some estimates are 80 percent public to (dynamic speed signs), and other traffic 20 percent private funding, regardless of control devices. the public entity's ability to pay or whether service is provided within the Cities that receive municipal state aid community. Funding has not kept pace (MSA)--those with populations above with the growing need for grade 5,000--may apply for and administer their separations. own SRTS grants. Non-MSA cities, even those with a city engineer on staff or c) Legislation brought by the railroad contract, must rely on the county to manage industry that would exempt railroads any grant funds secured as well as to from stormwater fees and assessments approve the project design. In some cities, and shift the cost of complying with this requirement has led to project delays stormwater management to other and disputes with counties over project property owners. design and delivery. d) The financial burden is faced by the Response: The League of Minnesota public sector to deal with mitigation Cities supports changes to MnDOT rules improvements, a cost that the Surface to allow small cities that have the capacity Transportation Board(STB) is not to manage SRTS grants and projects to requiring the private sector to pay. do so without county approval. e) At-grade crossings are blocked by both LE-44. Railroads long moving trains and by trains that stop and remain stopped, sometimes for Issue: Railroads impose far-reaching and hours at a time. Blocked crossings delay long-term impacts on communities. The motorists and sometimes prevent impact of railroads on communities has passage of emergency vehicles. become more pronounced in Minnesota as the number and length of trains have 113 f) Difficulty and expense of imposing and f) Impose and implement safety enforcing whistleblowing ordinances. standards that are in the best interest of the public,including requiring g) Unabated graffiti on railroad cars and every train that is carrying freight to structures. be operated with a crew of at least two crewmembers; h) Negative impacts of long- and short- term storage of rail cars on adjacent g) Equip and train local public safety properties. officials to respond to potential catastrophic rail incidents; i) Pre-emption of local and state authority to regulate railroad activities. h) Develop plans and identify funding sources for more grade separations Response: The League of Minnesota between railways and roadways; and Cities opposes legislation and policies that disproportionately shift authority, costs i) Fund and implement improvements to and/or liability away from railroad rail car storage facilities. companies and onto other entities. The railroad industry, along with state and The public sector should not incur the federal government, must: costs of improvements sought by the private sector, and cities should not be a) Adequately mitigate the negative required to fund most of the cost of impacts of railroads on communities; crossing repairs or improvements. The federal government must exercise greater b) Allow local governments to enforce oversight of the STB to ensure fair and the existing state and federal laws equitable solutions are reached when regarding the maximum time a dealing with cities in Minnesota. Finally, crossing may be blocked, and provide the Minnesota Department of a mechanism to do so; Transportation's (MnDOT's) Office of Freight and Passenger Rail should c) Provide that timely notice to the advocate on behalf of local communities impacted municipality is required in when conflicts between cities and railroad advance when a crossing or crossings entities arise. will be blocked by a stopped train; d) Require railroad companies to LE-45. Airport Planning and provide a direct emergency response Funding telephone number for city first responders (police, fire, ambulance or Issue:Airports are an essential component other designated official)to call when of Minnesota's transportation infrastructure. an at-grade crossing is blocked, and Airports in the State of Minnesota serve the emergency services need this important gateway to the region, the nation, crossing immediately unblocked to and global markets. They serve as a primary continue their response; access point to our national airport system. The Minneapolis St. Paul International e) Allow local governments to enforce Airport(MSP) is critical to the movement of whistle-free zones; people and goods in and out of the state and even with all the planned improvements, it 114 will eventually reach its capacity. The state Response: The state needs a higher degree needs to implement a long-term strategy to of integration of agencies (FAA, MnDOT, make better use of other airport facilities and MC, and MAC) and communities related existing resources, reduce environmental to aviation planning. The League of impacts, and achieve sound and sustainable Minnesota Cities supports the economic growth throughout the state. collaborative efforts initiated by the MCOA and supports the development of Aviation planning is a multi-layered effort a statewide airport advisory board,which with different levels of responsibilities. could provide input, review and make Currently, the State Airports System Plan is recommendations to assist in development put together by MnDOT with individual of a comprehensive statewide State pieces developed by the Federal Aviation Airports System Plan. Agency (FAA), Metropolitan Council (MC), and Metropolitan Airports Commission The state needs to make planning and (MAC). Aviation planning could be investment decisions that will maximize improved by a more unified statewide effort the potential for airports to become and coordination of the various aviation economic development centers that strategies through creation of an oversight provide access to domestic and global body. marketplaces. Investments in airports allow existing businesses to remain and Minn. Stat. § 360.017 establishes the State grow, help attract new businesses, Airport Fund and authorizes the Minnesota increase employment, and lower product Department of Transportation(MnDOT) and service costs for the benefit of the Office of Aeronautics to support cities, region. counties and townships in the planning, development, maintenance and safe Finally, the Legislature should not operation of public airports. In recent years, authorize shifting of dedicated State in order to help balance the state's budget, Airports Fund dollars to resolve general the Legislature transferred funds from the fund deficits State Airport Fund to the General Fund. Although the borrowed funds were LE-46. Airport Safety Zones eventually repaid in full, efforts to preserve and improve the quality of airports Issue: The field of aeronautics is regulated throughout the state were hindered by the generally by Minn. Stat. ch. 360 and Chapter unavailability of these revenues. 8800 of the Minnesota Rules. Land use safety zones and other public airport zoning The Minnesota Council of Airports standards are established in Minnesota Rules (MCOA), a membership organization for Chapter 8800.2400, and are adopted by local airport authorities and municipal entities airport zoning regulations that are submitted who own airports, has led efforts to bring to the Minnesota Department of stakeholders together. Most recently, the Transportation (MnDOT) commissioner for MCOA established the State Airports Fund review and approval before adoption. Committee to work with the MnDOT Office Airport safety zones are intended to restrict of Aeronautics to discuss and advise future land uses that may be hazardous to the management practices of the State Airport operational safety of aircraft using the public Fund. airport, and to protect the safety and 115 property of people on the ground in the area safety and property of people living and near the public airport. working near public airports. The League also recognizes that the Minnesota Rules While some of the provisions included in the related to public airport zoning standards Minnesota Rules are required by the Federal exceed the FAA's and other states' Aviation Administration(FAA), other standards and,thus, needlessly infringe provisions go well beyond the federal on local control. The League supports requirements. In some cases, the Minnesota changes to Minnesota Rules pertaining to Rules do not make sense for the community airport zoning standards that will more served by a public airport. closely align Minnesota's Rules with those in other states,while at the same time Finally, in some cases airports cross retaining local authority to be more multiple municipal jurisdictions. Neither restrictive than the Minnesota Rules. The state law nor Minnesota Rules provide League also supports changes to powers for joint airport zoning boards. Minnesota Statutes and Minnesota Rules These boards could be useful in resolving that would authorize powers for joint interjurisdictional issues involving airport airport zoning boards so issues related to planning, development, funding and zoning. funding, staffing, and authority to enforce ordinances can be resolved at the local Response: The League of Minnesota level. Cities supports efforts to protect the 116 HUMAN RESOURCES & DATA PRACTICES HR-1. Personnel Mandates and b) Provide funding that pays the full Limits on Local Control costs of any mandated employment- related expenditures. Issue: Many state laws increase the cost of providing city services to residents by c) Avoid and eliminate expensive and requiring city governments to provide time-consuming duplicative legal certain levels of compensation or benefits to protections and processes for public public employees,by specifying certain employees, including those that working conditions, or by limiting city preclude promotional probationary governments' ability to effectively manage periods. their personnel resources. For instance, existing state laws limit governments' d) Eliminate contradictory existing laws ability to effectively address incompetence regarding public employment. or misconduct of city employees by e) Eliminate mandates for local specifying certain procedures or standards of government employers that are not conduct that cities must follow. imposed upon the state as an Additionally, state law limits the tools that employer. cities can use to recruit and retain talent which creates challenges during times of f) Use the collective bargaining process low unemployment and a competitive labor established by state law, rather than market. Finally, several laws are potentially legal mandates, to determine benefits contradictory and force local governments to for employees covered by collective choose which one to follow. bargaining agreements. Response:Any new legislation and HR-2. Earned Sick and Safe Time changes to existing legislation should meet the following goals: Issue: In recent years, there have been legislative proposals to require employers to a) Recognize the need for local decision- provide "earned sick and safe time" making authority by local elected affording employees one hour of sick and officials with regard to the terms and safe time for every 30 hours worked. Cities conditions of employment for local recognize their employees for their government employees (e.g. allow dedication to public service and currently local elected officials to determine provide a wide variety of excellent benefits employee compensation, employee to their employees and prioritize the health recognition, and to make employee and well-being of staff. Benefits include benefit decisions, and allow greater paid time off for most staff who are required flexibility in how cities may utilize to be enrolled in the Public Employee public funds for the recruitment and Retirement Association(PERA) (Minn. Stat. retention of employees in an ever § 353.01, subds. 2a, 2b). In developing leave changing job market). and benefit policies, cities must be mindful of the cost to citizens for programs, much of 117 which are driven by staff compensation and c) Review the methodology for analyzing benefits. pay equity data; and Response: To avoid significant cost d) Evaluate the process by which cities increases and to provide clarity,the receive notification of reporting Legislature should use the same eligibility requirements and compliance issues requirements for public employees and make recommendations for outlined in state statute for PERA improvement as needed. participation if a mandatory sick and sick and safe time program is enacted by the HR-4. Public Employment Labor Legislature. Relations Act (PELRA) HR-3. Pay Equity Compliance Issue: The League of Minnesota Cities supports the purpose of the Public Issue: In 1984, the Legislature passed the Employment Labor Relations Act(PELRA) Local Government Pay Equity Act to to balance the rights and interests of public eliminate sex-based wage disparities in employees, public employers, and the public employment. The Act requires each general public. However, certain changes local government to submit reports of its pay are necessary to assist public employers in structure to the state's Pay Equity implementing this law. For example, current Compliance Coordinator within the definitions of"public employee" are Department of Management and Budget. confusing and difficult to manage. In The data is then subject to analysis to addition, the arbitration process has determine if there are inequities in the city's produced decisions that are contrary to the pay structure. Since its passage, the interests of the public, and the legal standard administrative rules implementing the Act for overturning arbitration decisions is very have not substantively changed. difficult to meet. Also, recent interpretations of Minn. Stat. § 179A.25 Response: The League of Minnesota (independent review of non-union employee Cities supports the Local Government grievances)has created uncertainty and Pay Equity Act and seeks to partner with confusion in the longstanding judicial the Legislature and the state's Pay Equity process used by courts to review city council Compliance Coordinator to update and administrative decisions, particularly improve the current system so that cities employment termination decisions of non- can more efficiently and effectively fulfill union employees. the mandated reporting requirements. Local governments and the state should: Response: Minn. Stat. ch. 179A should be modified to: a) Explore and document problems individual local governments are a) Change the definition of"public experiencing, and evaluate whether employee" under PELRA by the problems are widespread and if removing the existing 14-hour/67-day they can be resolved administratively; requirement and replace it with a definition in which employees must b) Evaluate the reporting process, and work an annual average of 20 hours make recommendations for or more per week. improvement as needed; 118 b) Exclude temporary or seasonal HR-5. Implications of Janus v. employees, as well as unpaid AFSCME volunteers, from the PELRA definition of public employee in Minn. Issue: Historically, both members and non- Stat. ch. 179A. members of public sector unions could opt out of paying the portion of dues that c) Provide different options for accessing explicitly go to the union's political arbitrators and utilizing the activities. But, until recently, non-members arbitration process in order to were still required to pay what was called a "address inequities" between union "fair share" fee, allegedly because even non- and management representatives. members receive the benefits of union d) Allow public employers to bypass representation. Union dues are deducted mandatory arbitration required under from employee paychecks by employers PELRA and directly access the based on notification of membership district court or Office of provided by labor unions. Administrative Hearings system in Overruling decades of precedent, in June situations where an employee is being 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled it is terminated for gross misconduct(e.g., unconstitutional for public employees who excessive use of force, sexual object to belonging to a union to be required harassment, sexual abuse,theft or a to pay a fair share fee. (Janus v. AFSCME). felony conviction) that is related to the Specifically, the Supreme Court held that employee's position with the public laws compelling fair share dues from employer,including establishment of a unwilling members violated the First standard that defers to the public Amendment by requiring these employees employer's decision on termination if to, in effect, pay for speech with which they it has met a standard of do not agree, and that affirmative, voluntary reasonableness. consent is required for dues deduction. e) Repeal Minn. Stat. § 179A.25 or,in Given the degree of uncertainty about the lieu of repeal, exclude employment implications of the ruling,public employees terminations from Minn. Stat. are seeking information about their constitutional rights regarding labor union § 179A.25; require a 60-day membership and associated dues. The timeframe for filing a petition for Minnesota Public Employment Labor review of a grievance under Minn. Relations Act defines unfair labor practices Stat. § 179A.25; and clarify that ("ULPs")to include dominating or decisions of Bureau of Mediation interfering with the formation, existence, or Services (BMS) under this section are administration of union membership. To non-binding and merely advisory. avoid a potential allegation that they have 0The League opposes legislation that engaged in unfair labor practices, if would propose employer payment of employees seek information about union grievance arbitration fees when a membership from their employers, settlement is offered to a grievant and employers often refer their employees to declined. union representatives for additional information. The Minnesota Bureau of Mediation Services (BMS) is the state 119 agency charged with providing technical HR-6. Public Employment training and information on collective Relations Board bargaining for the public sector in Minnesota. BMS would be an ideal resource Issue: Dating back to the 1970's, Minnesota for employees to find critical information had a Public Employment Relations Board about labor union membership,particularly (PERB) in place, but over time, its in the wake of the recent Supreme Court responsibilities were changed and reassigned ruling. to another bureau. Until the reemergence of the PERB in 2014,unfair labor practices Additionally, as public sector unions are (ULPs) actions could be brought in examining methods to compensate for fair Minnesota District Courts through injunctive share revenue that may now be lost, laws relief. In 2014, the Legislature recreated have been proposed in states outside of PERB to hear ULPs filed by employees, Minnesota, which preempt the bargaining employers and labor unions under the Public process and impose new requirements on Employment Labor Relations Act(PELRA). public employers. Some of the proposed The board was created in Minn. Stat. ch. requirements are designed to help unions 179A and after receiving initial funding, the market their services to their members or to board has yet to be fully funded or require the public employers to pay the costs operational. Much of the current statutory of collective bargaining. language regarding implementation should Response: To ensure that both public be amended to ensure the PERB operates employers and public employees successfully and efficiently for both public successfully navigate the current employees and employers. unknowns following the Janus decision, Response: The League of Minnesota the League of Minnesota Cities urges Cities supports the structure and process BMS to provide and disseminate to address ULPs that was utilized before information to employees about union the reestablishment of the PERB in 2014. membership across the state. The League If the PERB is implemented fully and also urges the Legislature to act to protect funded sufficiently,the League of public employers against: Minnesota Cities encourages the a) ULP charges when providing factual Legislature to make the following information to employees about union changes: membership; a) Create statutory authority for the b) ULP charges when requiring unions PERB to establish a fee-based to provide original documentation of structure for filing ULPs and to pay voluntary consent to dues deduction; for hearing officers,with costs to be and shared by employers and authorized representatives; c) being forced to pay the direct cost of b) Allow the PERB to defer to the employee representation by unions. decisions made by an arbitrator to prevent duplicative litigation on the same issue; and 120 c) Amend the Minnesota Government employment with the city but later been re- Data Practices Act and the Open employed by a different employer; Meeting Law to properly maintain the sometimes this occurs when the employee integrity of the hearing process. has been found to have committee gross misconduct while employed by the city. HR-7. Essential Employees Additionally, employers are prohibited from Issue: Cities must balance the health, entering into agreements with employees not welfare, and safety of the public with the to contest or appeal payment of costs to taxpayers. Essential employee status unemployment benefits as part of a removes the right to strike but gives the right settlement agreement at termination of to mandatory binding arbitration. This status employment. Because most cities are can result in arbitration awards that exceed "reimbursement employers,"the majority of the city's budget or conflict with the city's the cost of benefits paid to the employee are compensation policy. at the direct expense of the city. The ability to enter into such an agreement can greatly Response: The Legislature should aid a city in reaching a settlement at a carefully examine requests from interest relatively low-cost to the city's taxpayers. groups seeking essential employee status under Minn. Stat. ch. 179A (PELRA). Response: Cities should not be forced to The League of Minnesota Cities opposes pay benefits as base wage employers if the legislation that mandates arbitration that employee is determined to have increases costs and removes local committed gross misconduct during their decision-making authority. employment with the city, even if the employee voluntarily resigns. In addition, The League supports a mandate for Final cities (as reimbursement employers) Offer/Total Package arbitration for all should be allowed to enter into essential groups on a trial basis. The agreements with employees to not contest League also supports a change in the a determination of eligibility for PELRA law that would strengthen unemployment benefits where the existing language (Minn. Stat. § 179A.16, employer and employee mutually agree to subd. 7) requiring arbitrators to consider this as a term of separation. a public employer's obligation to efficiently manage their operations. HR-9. Public Employee Defined Specifically, the statute should be Benefit Pension Plans amended to require arbitrators to take into consideration any wage adjustments Issue: Public pensions are an important already given to or negotiated with other employee benefit that can help cities attract groups—both union and non-union for and retain employees. However, unlike the same employer in the same contract salary and other employee benefits that are year. established by each city, the pension contribution rates and benefit levels are set HR-8. Re-employment Benefits by the state legislature. Benefit levels and plan costs must be carefully balanced to Issue: Cities are often required to help pay assure long-term sustainability of the the benefits of workers who have initially pension plans and affordability to employers been denied benefits through their and employees. Despite ongoing funding 121 issues, the Legislature and Governor had Response: The League of Minnesota been unable to reach agreement on Cities supports the sustainability sustainability changes to the Public modifications enacted by the legislature in Employees Retirement Association plans. 2018 and continues to oppose any benefit improvements for retirees or active In 2018, the Legislature enacted a major employees until the financial health of the pension reform package to improve the General Plan and the Police and Fire Plan long-term financial status of the PERA is restored. pension plans. The legislation included benefit reductions for active employees, For the PERA General Plan, any further contribution increases for Police and Fire increases in employer contributions Plan employers and active employees and a should only be considered by the modified cost of living adjustment(COLA) Legislature after other measures have for retirees. been considered,including: Acknowledging rapidly rising inflation and a) An increase in employee contributions public sector recruitment and retention so that employees and employers truly issues during the 2022 session, legislators bear the same responsibility to bring discussed modifications to public pensions, the pension plans to full funding; or including enhanced cost-of-living adjustments for retirees as well as reductions b) The removal of the cap on PERA to the employee contribution rates for both Pension Aid payments under Minn. the PERA Police and Fire Plan(-2.4 percent Stat. § 273.1385 and the extension of of salary) as well as the General Plan(-0.25 the aid program after FY2020, so the percent of salary). In order to implement state equalizes the contributions of these contribution reductions, the initial employees and employers. proposal would have modified the statutory language defining the employer/employee The League also supports: contribution split for the P&F plan to specify that"employers shall contribute not a) Fully offsetting the additional less than 60 percent and employees shall not unfunded liability of any proposed contribute more than 40 percent" of the employee contribution reduction with required total contribution, which could direct state aid to the plan. result in an annual battle between employers b) Modifications to the PERA eligibility and employees over the financial guidelines to take into account responsibility for the necessary contributions. temporary, seasonal, unique part- time, and student employment Under these proposals, the financial impact situations in cities,particularly in to the plans would be offset by additional recreational operations. These direct aid. Unfortunately, the aid modifications should include the use appropriation for the contribution reduction of pro-rated service credit,which proposal was static while the impact of the would make PERA consistent with the contribution reduction on regular wage other major Minnesota pension plans. growth would have eroded the funding level c) A comprehensive review of exclusions of the plans over time. from pension participation with the 122 goal of simplifying current eligibility c) Increasing the minimum and full guidelines. Such a review should also retirement ages for new PERA Police include a possible revision of current and Fire plan participants. penalties for employers that fail to report covered employees to ensure d) Implementing a contribution-based that these penalties are not overly benefit formula that would align harsh and punitive. benefits payable with contributions made on behalf of an employee in d) The transfer of all school district order to address high-five spiking employees out of the PERA General issues. Plan and into another fund that is more appropriate for school district The League also supports: employees as long as the change would not negatively impact the financial a) Maintaining the current 60/40 health of the pension funds nor result contribution split between employers in employer contribution increases. and employees. The continued authority of cities to effectively use retirees in b) Fully offsetting the additional reemployment situations. The League unfunded liability of any proposed supports policy changes which would employee contribution reduction with include an increase in the earnings direct state aid to the plan. threshold for such retirees and c) Maintaining the statutory changes supports keeping the required break made to Minn. Stat. § 353.01 in 2007 in service at 30 days and opposes that separate injuries resulting from suspending payments to retirees. "hazardous duties" from injuries For PERA Police and Fire, any further resulting from "non-hazardous increases in employer contributions duties" for purposes of police and fire should only be considered by the disability retirement benefits. Legislature after other measures have d) A thorough study by PERA of the been considered, including: current effects of overtime a) An initial increase in the employee accumulation and outside employment contribution of at least 1.0% of salary compensation on individual pension with subsequent increases split evenly benefits and the overall funding of the between employee and employer so plan. The study should also include that the contribution ratio moves recommendations on whether the toward a more equitable split between overtime or outside employment employees and employers; or should be factored into or excluded from high five average wage b) An additional state general fund calculations. appropriation to fund the deficiency in police and fire pension aid e) Allowing cities,including cities with payments so that the state equalizes combination (full-time and paid-on the contributions of employers and call staff) fire departments, to work employees. with their fire relief associations to 123 determine the best application of fire HR-10. Deferred Compensation state aid. Issue: Cities and other local units of For PERA Corrections Plan the League government have been offering employees supports: the option to invest in deferred compensation programs under 457(b) of the a) Maintaining the current definition of federal Internal Revenue Code. Minn. Stat.§ covered employees for the PERA 356.24, subd. 3 imposes requirements for corrections plan,which does not the plan administrator or vendor of a include dispatchers due to the deferred compensation plan to: (1)provide substantial differences between the the fee disclosure document to the plan's job responsibilities of dispatchers and participants, and(2) file the fee disclosure the existing corrections positions document with the executive director of the covered by this plan. LCPR(Legislative Commission on Pensions b) Fully offsetting the additional and Retirement)within 30 days of the end of unfunded liability of any proposed each fiscal year of the plan. If a 457(b)plan employee contribution reduction with administrator or vendor fails to comply with direct state aid to the plan. the reporting requirements, the plan would potentially be an unlawful recipient of For all PERA defined benefit plans the public funds that are made by a city on League supports: behalf of an employee. a) Adjustments to the benefits for active These new requirements are ambiguous and members and retirees to reduce the confusing., For example, it is unclear cost of the plans. whether the prohibition on contributing "public funds"to a 457(b)plan includes b) Requiring special legislation for situations where cities allow unused leave individual employee pension benefit or unused health insurance contributions to increases be initiated or approved by be converted to a monetary contribution. the city council of the impacted city unless the cost of the benefit increase The law should also specify that any is fully covered by the individual or deferred compensation plan authorized by the legislation addresses a clerical or Internal Revenue Service regulations for administrative error. local units of government are also authorized by the state. c) Requiring PERA to collect and consider all employer-provided Response: The Minn. Stat. § 356.24, subd. information,including independent 3 reporting requirements enacted in 2020 medical examinations and other for 457(b) deferred compensation plans relevant personnel data and to are confusing, unclear and unnecessary broaden the basis for appealing and should be repealed. At minimum,the disability determination decisions. requirements need to clearly define what constitutes public funds, and exempt public employers that do not contribute public funds to a 457(b)plan from the reporting requirements. In addition, the law should be amended to include all IRS- 124 approved deferred compensation plans a) The state must fully fund programs that are authorized for local units of that pay for health insurance for government. police and fire employees injured in the line of duty and dependents of HR-11. State Paid Police and Fire police and fire employees killed in the Medical Insurance line of duty as originally required under Minn. Stat. § 299A.465. Issue: Minn. Stat. § 299A.465 requires public employers to continue health b) The Legislature must avoid further insurance benefits for firefighters and peace expansion of eligibility for benefits officers injured in the line of duty. When the under Minn. Stat. § 299A.465 unless law was enacted in 1997, it contained a 1) full funding for benefits is provided provision requiring the Department of by the state; and 2) beneficiaries can Public Safety (DPS) to reimburse employers be enrolled in a state health insurance for the full amount of administering this plan such as the Public Employees benefit. Insurance Program (PEIP). By 2002, the fund created to provide this c) Cumulative injuries that occur over benefit became deficient. Instead of time in the job should not qualify a increasing the fund, the 2003 Legislature police officer or firefighter for benefits amended the law to pro-rate reimbursements under Minn. Stat. § 299A.465 since to cities based on the amount available and these types of cumulative injuries are the number of eligible applicants. The 2003 not unique to the dangers of police law change triggered a significant and officer and firefighter duties. unanticipated cost to cities. The cost has increased every year for cities, and the d) The Legislature must clarify that the funding for the account has never been amount of an employer's contribution increased. Even if the health insurance under Minn. Stat. § 299A.465 is no benefit was discontinued entirely, the costs greater than that given to active for existing recipients will substantially employees in the same job class. increase well into the future due to the growing cost of health insurance. e) The Legislature must establish the minimum criteria used to determine In 2015, the Legislature expanded the health ability to work and set a percentage insurance benefit to include survivors of threshold of disability for eligibility volunteer firefighters who die in the line of into this program.At a minimum,the duty. This change increased the number of Legislature must identify that a firefighters eligible for this benefit from workers' compensation determination 2,000 to 20,000—without increasing as to whether the injury is work- funding for the reimbursement account. related is necessary in order to receive the benefits under Minn. Stat. § Response: The League of Minnesota 299A.465. Cities supports the following legislative actions to address the funding deficiency 0 Employees who receive a police and in this program: fire disability retirement benefit and accept another job that offers them group health benefits should be 125 required to pay for their group health a) Opposes legislative action that benefits with the city should they undermines local flexibility to manage decide to continue them. The rising health care costs. Legislature must amend Minn. Stat. § 299A.465 to reflect that employees are b) Encourages the Legislature to required to inform the city when they carefully examine the costs and become eligible for coverage under administrative impacts of any new, another group plan and that failure to mandated insurance-related benefit do so is grounds for termination from before imposing it upon city the benefits granted under Minn. Stat. employers. § 299A.465. c) Supports changes to Minn. Stat. g) The legislature should establish a task § 471.6161, subd. 5, that would clarify force to study the long-term costs of the intent of the subdivision is to this program, including funding for address changes in cost vs. changes in an actuarial consultant, and make value (e.g., changes in provider recommendations on changes to make networks, changes in benefit levels it more financially feasible for required by an incumbent insurance Minnesota taxpayers. carrier, changes required for compliance with state and federal HR-12. Health Care Insurance laws, including those needed to avoid Programs incurring the federal excise tax known as the "Cadillac Tax". Issue: Cities, like other employers in the d) Supports changes to Minn. Stat. state, are struggling with the rising costs of health care insurance for their employees. In § 471.61 so that the requirement for addition, cities must cope with unfunded cities to offer retiree coverage begins mandates imposed on them by the on the date the retiree and/or Legislature such as the requirement to pool dependents become eligible for federal early retirees with active employees and the Medicare coverage. requirement to bargain over changes in the "aggregate value" of benefits, even when the e) Supports a clarification to Minn. Stat city's contribution has not changed. § 471.61 and to Minn. Stat. § 471.617 to explicitly alleviate a city's Response: The League of Minnesota responsibility to comply with group Cities supports legislative efforts to health benefits mandated by state law control health insurance costs while when the city's employees are covered maintaining quality health care services. under a union plan authorized by However, cities have differing local needs federal statutes. and circumstances and must retain the flexibility to provide unique and creative 0 Supports statutory authorization for solutions to the rising costs of health care cities to collect up to a two percent insurance for their employees. The administrative fee from retirees League: receiving post-retirement health insurance benefits. 126 g) Opposes any mandatory, centralized, safety workers, and to make the statewide health insurance option for presumptions more conclusive and difficult active or retired city employees. to rebut. These types of benefit expansions would further increase municipal workers' h) Supports changing Minn. Stat. § compensation costs. 62A.21 to place reasonable limits on health care continuation for former Response: Legislative action is necessary spouses, similar to the Federal to address increasing workers' COBRA law. compensation costs,particularly rising medical costs. The League of Minnesota HR-13. Workers' Compensation Cities supports: Issue: Rising medical costs are an a) Use of the Workers Compensation increasingly serious problem for all Advisory Council (WCAC) system to employers and insurers, and now represent consider proposals for changes to the over half of all loss costs within the workers' compensation law and urges workers' compensation system. Medical the WCAC and the Legislature to costs will be a major driver of future approve medical cost containment workers' compensation premium increases. reforms. In addition, the 2013 legislature added post- traumatic stress disorder(PTSD) as a b) Filling an existing WCAC employer compensable injury and in 2014, a vacancy with a public-sector employer Minnesota Supreme Court decision found representative or adding a designated that provisions in the Workers' public-sector employer representative Compensation statute which allow workers to the WCAC. compensation benefits for permanent and total disabilities to be offset by disability c) Continuing the WCRA as the benefits and pension benefits such as Social mandatory workers' compensation Security does not apply to retirement reinsurer for insurers and self- benefits of the Public Employees Retirement insurers in Minnesota and supports Association. In 2018, the Legislature modifying state statutes to treat PTSD modified Minn. Stat. § 176.011, subd. 15, events involving several affected which defines an occupational disease to add parties as one occurrence for retention a rebuttable presumption to a diagnosis of purposes,thereby reducing the PTSD in certain public safety and related exposure of self-insured entities and personnel. In 2020, the legislature initially the statewide insurance pools. Such a modified Minn. Stat. § 176.011, subd. 15 to change would not have any effect on temporarily add a diagnosis of COVID-19 the benefit an individual employee for peace officers, firefighters, paramedics would receive. and other defined employee classes as a presumed occupational disease covered by d) Legislation that would disallow the the workers' compensation system and this "stacking" of PERA retirement presumption has been extended through benefits and Workers Compensation January 13, 2023. The Minnesota benefits due to the fact that some Legislature also regularly considered injured employees could receive total proposals to expand the heart, lung and compensation from workers' infectious disease presumptions for public compensation and PERA retirement 127 benefits that would be well above the HR-14. Public Safety Duty salary that they had been earning and Disability the fact that the costs would ultimately be passed on to cities and their Issue: The League of Minnesota Cities and taxpayers. the communities it serves recognize the inherent dangers faced by peace officers and e) Extending the time limit on denials of firefighters in the line of duty. The duties liability for PTSD injuries from the performed by public safety employees current 14 days in order to allow sometimes lead to physical and mental diagnosis in accordance with the injuries. requirements contained in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of In recent years, the number of public safety Mental Disorders (DSM)which guides employees seeking duty disability the diagnosis of PTSD under determinations through the Public Minnesota Law (Minn. Stat. § Employees Retirement Association(PERA) 176.011, subd. 15). and making workers' compensation claims for line-of-duty injuries has accelerated. f) Policies that provide opportunities for This is particularly true in the wake of a employees diagnosed with PTSD to 2019 legislative change that made post- receive treatment for PTSD that could traumatic stress disorder(PTSD) a result in continued employment with presumptive condition for workers' the local government. compensation purposes. The League is g) State funding to assist with the concerned about these trends for the potential extraordinary costs of the following reasons: COVID-19 workers' compensation a) Every injury that leads to a PERA duty occupational disease presumption disability retirement and/or workers' enacted in Session Laws 2020,Regular compensation claim impacts the Session Chapter 72, extended to employee, the employee's family and the December 31, 2021 in Session Laws employee's organization. 2021, Chapter 12 and re-enacted from February 3, 2022 through January 13, b) The current system for processing and 2023 in Session Laws 2022, Chapter addressing duty disability benefits can 32. be incompatible with the goal of restoring good health and returning The League opposes expansion of employees to work. workers' compensation and related health insurance benefits because of the c) The fiscal impact of the increasing potential for dramatically increasing costs number of claims is unsustainable for to cities. Specifically, the League opposes employers and, ultimately, taxpayers. expansion of the heart, lung and infectious disease and PTSD d) Public safety agencies,particularly those presumptions,the creation of new that are very small and already occupational disease presumptions as well experiencing recruitment and retention as any expansion of the law that would challenges, will not remain viable if they require payment of health insurance continue to sustain significant personnel premiums. losses. 128 Given these concerns, the League and cities 3) Providing early across Minnesota have invested resources intervention/resources for public into mental and physical injury education, safety employees who experience prevention and treatment. The League has work-related trauma; and also consulted with experts, including those experienced with treating combat veterans, 4) Providing paid time off or light duty who report that with successful treatment, for public safety employees who many injured public safety employees can experience work-related trauma; achieve optimal outcomes of restoring good health for themselves, their families and g) Identifying resources (partnerships) to returning to work. The League is actively help temporarily backfill positions so working with cities and other stakeholders, employees may take needed time off including public safety labor representatives, without losing their jobs or causing to advance the following: hardship for employers/agencies; and a) Normalizing conversations about mental h) Developing best practices for return-to- health within local government duty following a mental injury. organizations and their public safety departments; Response: In order to achieve optimal outcomes, additional statewide policies b) Promoting statewide peer support best and resources are necessary. The League practices and training programs; of Minnesota Cities supports: c) Identifying ways to promote cultural a) Legislative changes that will help behaviors that enhance public safety ensure appropriate diagnosis and physical and mental wellness; treatment for employees with mental injuries; d) Educating stakeholders (employers, employees and state and local leaders) b) Full state funding for the Public about PTSD signs, symptoms, treatment Safety Officer Benefit Account that options and outcomes; reimburses employers for providing continued health insurance to police e) Gathering empirical evidence related to officers and firefighters injured in the treatability of mental injuries; line of duty and dependents of those killed (Minn. Stat. § 299A.465); f) Develop human resources guidance that focus on: c) Funding to reimburse local governments for providing paid time 1) Enhancing relationships between off to public safety employees who public safety and human resources experience work-related trauma managers to coordinate and and/or are seeking treatment for a streamline prevention of, and mental injury; response to, duty disability injuries; d) Funding for initiatives and programs 2) Implementing best practices and that provide peer support, emotional initiatives aimed at improving mental trauma training, early intervention health wellness and preventing and and mental health treatment; coping with PTSD; 129 e) Requiring public safety college providing a substitute sample, providing a programs to include mental health sample that is not human urine,providing a and specifically PTSD education as sample that is not capable of being tested, part of their curriculum, focusing on etc. State law is silent on these outcomes. prevention and coping; Response: The League of Minnesota f) Funding for emotional trauma Cities supports the following changes to training for pre-service and in-service the DATWA: public safety officers; and a) Updates to reflect new issues, such as g) Advancing wellness for public safety adding new definitions as needed to employees as a component of law reflect current practices; enforcement reform. b) Clarification that a positive controlled HR-15. Drug and Alcohol Testing substance test during probation does in the Workplace not require the employer to provide an employee who has not completed Issue: Employer testing of job applicants is probation a chance for rehabilitation governed by Minn. Stat. § 181.950— and treatment; and 181.957 and is known as the Drug and Alcohol Testing in the Workplace Act c) Permitting the use of breathalyzers (DATWA). It applies to all employers with and saliva swabs as acceptable one or more employees, including cities. technology for determining alcohol The DATWA has not been amended for use. many years to reflect various and significant changes in drug-testing technology nor HR-16. Veterans Preference policy changes at the federal level. Issue: Cities have a long history of The DATWA prohibits an employer from recruiting and hiring veterans as they are a terminating an employee for a positive natural fit in city government. Across the controlled substance test without first state, cities are partners in working with and providing the employee a chance for ensuring veterans have a variety of rehabilitation and treatment. This law opportunities afforded to them given their applies to probationary employees as well as sacrifice and service. The purpose of the those who have completed probation. Minnesota Veteran's Preference Act(VPA) is to facilitate the transition of veterans from Currently, breathalyzer use and saliva swabs the military to civilian life and to help are permitted for alcohol testing under compensate veterans for their sacrifices of federal commercial driver testing laws health and time to the community, state and though Minnesota does not allow for the use nation. The VPA grants veterans limited of breathalyzers in testing. Use of preference over nonveterans in hiring and breathalyzers for employee alcohol testing is promotion for most state and local a less invasive, less expensive method. In government employment to recognize the addition, federal commercial driver testing training and experience they received as a laws address a number of outcomes other result of serving in the military. It also than a positive test result, including but not provides local government employees who limited to tampering with a sample, are veterans some protection against unfair 130 demotions and dismissals. These preferences HR-17. Military Leave and protections are commonly referred to as Reimbursement "veteran's preference" and are codified in Minn. Stat. §§ 43A.11, 197.455, 197.46, Issue: Minn. Stat. § 192.26 subd. 1, requires 197.48, and 197.481. local units of government to provide 15 days of compensation per year to employees who Once a veteran has completed an initial are members of the military for military probationary period upon hire, they cannot leave. State laws give preference to hiring be removed from their position or veterans for public sector jobs, and, citizen employment, except for incompetency or soldiers are a natural fit to also serve as misconduct shown after a properly noticed public safety personnel. As such, many hearing. Currently, a veteran can only be public safety personnel are often also placed on probation upon hire but not members of the military and are required to following a promotion. It is common conduct training and military duties practice to place employees on probation throughout the year. following employee promotion making this restriction inconsistent with current practice In addition to providing compensation for and procedure. mandatory military leave, cities must also ensure that these temporary vacancies are Termination hearings are held before the adequately filled by public safety personnel local civil service commission or before an whose training and qualifications are unique arbitrator and Minn. Stat. § 197.46 allows a to providing public safety. This can result in veteran to choose a hearing before the local added overtime costs and may impact public civil service commission, or an arbitrator. safety service levels. Members of civil service commissions are chosen for their expertise and experience Government employers honor and recognize with employment law. Hiring an arbitrator the importance of ensuring members of the for a hearing instead of utilizing an military are able to fulfill their duties and established civil service commission is participate in mandatory training, while also inefficient. aiming to ensure that public safety service in their community is efficient, seamless, and Response: The League of Minnesota cost-effective. In response to this issue, there Cities recognizes the important have been recent legislative proposals to contributions veterans have made and reimburse local units of government for supports giving veterans limited military leave paid to public safety preference in employment. To strengthen personnel. and improve the VPA,the legislature should: Response: The League of Minnesota Cities supports state funding to ensure a) Allow cities to place veterans on that local units of government can probationary periods upon promotion maintain quality and cost-effective public as they do with other employees; and safety services in their communities and b) Restore the language in Minn. Stat. § for their taxpayers while also offering full 197.46 requiring a hearing to be held support for employees who are members before a local civil service commission of the military. Such state funding could include reimbursement of costs incurred where one exists. to local units of government related to 131 compensating personnel on military leave cities struggle with limited staff and as well as reimbursement for costs related resources while larger cities struggle with to ensuring these temporary vacancies are larger complex databases. The MGDPA adequately filled. must balance the right of citizens to access public data with the cost to municipalities of HR-18. Tele-Health Exams complying with certain types of data requests. Issue: Technology improvements are creating new ways to approach many city In 2014, the Legislature imposed additional functions. Specifically, the increased security requirements on political acceptance of the use of tele-health(audio subdivisions in an attempt to prevent and video, web-based) exams creates an unauthorized individuals from accessing opportunity for cities to access and use private data. Adequate security measures are psychologists with specific expertise in important, but they make compliance with public safety as part of the hiring process for the MGDPA more difficult and costly. police officers. However, the Peace Officers Although the Legislature has made Standards and Training (POST) Board has compliance with the MGDPA a priority, adopted a position prohibiting the use of funding for the Data Practices Office of the tele-health exams for the required Department of Administration, the psychological oral interview/evaluation department charged with overseeing the prior to hiring. MGDPA, does not reflect the increased need for local government assistance. Response: The League of Minnesota Cities supports the use of tele-health Cities continue to receive repetitive, overly (audio and video,web-based) exams to broad and far-reaching data requests that meet the requirements of the POST require significant staff time to locate Board for a psychological oral government records, redact private data or interview/evaluation prior to hiring a data unrelated to the request, and assemble police officer candidate. documents to be provided in order to comply with requirements to provide access Data Practices to public government data. Cities are experiencing significant increases in wide- DP-1. Data Practices Compliance ranging data requests, often utilizing specific Costs word searches through multiple databases. "Word search"requests typically result in a Issue: The purpose of the Minnesota voluminous quantity of data that must be Government Data Practices Act(MGDPA) reviewed and redacted, with significant staff is to protect personal information from cost. Because word searches retrieve even indiscriminate disclosure while balancing incidental references to the searched term, the right of the public to know what the the search results often contain a significant government is doing. The Act also attempts volume of data that has little informational to balance these rights within a context of value. If the requestor does not request effective government operation. The League copies, the search costs cannot be recovered of Minnesota Cities supports the public —even though the requestor dictated the policy behind the MGDPA while specifics of the search. acknowledging that compliance with the law imposes costs on local taxpayers. Smaller 132 Furthermore, in some situations, as with e) Creating and funding an overly broad data requests related to ombudsperson position in the Data "applicant" lists, staff time and costs are Practices Office to determine significantly increased and not recoverable reasonableness and proportionality of for very limited public benefit. The MGDPA data practices requests. also limits the ability of cities to be reimbursed for responding to requests. f) Providing funding and authority to the Data Practices Office to engage in Cities are limited to charging only 25-cents the rulemaking process to establish per page for copies of police motor vehicle standards and procedures related to incident reports, which does not cover the requests and responses to data city cost for copying, while the practices requests that impose Commissioner of Public Safety is exempt significant burdens on government from this restriction—thereby permitting the entities. Department of Public Safety to continue to charge $5 for incident reports that cities are g) Amending the MGDPA to limit what required to submit to the department. is considered public applicant data to better balance the value of public data Response: As the cost of complying with with the cost related to data practices the MGDPA increases, the League compliance. supports: h) Allowing political subdivisions to a) Providing additional state funding to charge the same amount for copies of assist political subdivisions with motor vehicle incident reports issued meeting the increasing complexity of by local police and fire departments as managing government data. the commissioner of public safety. b) Providing state funding for statewide The League of Minnesota Cities opposes: data practices training. a) Further increasing the maximum c) Allowing political subdivisions to exemplary damages that courts may charge for the staff time that is impose against government entities, required to comply with wide-ranging including cities, found to have violated data requests regardless of whether the MGDPA; further increasing the copies of the data are requested or maximum civil penalty that may be allowing political subdivisions to imposed when a court order is issued charge for actual costs for collection of to compel a government entity to data when the requestor makes his or comply with MGDPA; or any her own copy of the data by taking a statutory change that would make it a photo, bringing a copy device, etc. mandatory civil penalty to compel compliance under the MGDPA. d) Providing a mechanism that would permit cities to challenge whether a b) Repealing of the administrative data request is reasonable and made remedies provisions adopted by the in good faith. 2010 Legislature to address disputes regarding MGDPA compliance issues. 133 DP-2. Records Retention in paper form, computers had just become Compliance Costs viable for home users, word processing had just become a reality, the first point-and- Issue: The Official Records Act requires shoot, autofocus camera came on the government entities to "make and preserve market, and the internet was still about a all records necessary to a full and accurate decade on the horizon. knowledge of their official activities." In accordance, cities must establish a records While the MGDPA was originally drafted to retention schedule, and maintain and destroy be future thinking by contemplating the official records according to this schedule. various forms data could be held—including There are rigorous requirements for any the concept of storage media—the changes to a city's records retention legislators of the time could not have schedule, including getting approval from imagined where technology would be today. the statutorily-created Records Disposition For example, the originally-drafted MGDPA Panel, which strikes an appropriate balance made reference to photostatic, between the government entity's decision- microphotographic, or microfilmed records. making role in determining retention and Minn. Stat. § 13.03, subd. 1. The current law disposition of official records with the still refers to these same mediums of data, public's right to know the government despite few cities maintaining data in this entity's official activities. manner. Response: As the cost of complying with Technology has exploded, and the type of the records management laws increases, data collected by this new technology has the League supports providing additional multiplied. In our current reality, the public state funding to assist political and government have been frustrated by subdivisions with meeting the increasing how best to access government data. In complexity of managing government Webster v. Hennepin County, 910 N.W. 2d records. 420 (Minn. 2018), the County was asked to conduct a computer-aided search of all its The League of Minnesota Cities opposes email accounts over multiple years for 20 changing the current record management separate search terms related to biometrics requirements and statutory definitions. If and facial recognition. The Minnesota changes are needed, subject matter Supreme Court found that the County failed experts should make recommendations to establish procedures to ensure appropriate through the records retention schedule and prompt compliance with data requests process. but did not find that the County failed to keep its records in an arrangement and DP-3. Updating the Minnesota condition to make them easily accessible for Government Data Practices Act convenient use. The Court also did not address if a term search was a valid data Issue: The Minnesota Government Data practices request or if a request could be Practices Act(MGDPA) was first enacted in unduly burdensome. The lack of direction 1979. Almost 40 years later, times have from the Court on these issues leaves a void. changed dramatically. In particular, there has been exponential change in technology. There are also other advances in technology In 1979, cities were largely maintaining data that are not comprehensively addressed by the MGDPA. While the Legislature has 134 attempted to address technological responsive data could be stored in multiple advancements as they come, it has been in data bases. Further, with the advent of piecemeal ways. cloud-based information systems provided by the private sector, newer databases are Response: The Legislature should update not typically designed to be controlled by the MGDPA to comprehensively address cities to easily separate public from non- technological changes since the Act was public data. first enacted. Because the MGDPA is a complicated area of law,the Legislature Response: The state of current should make changes based on the technology requires cities to maintain recommendations from subject matter large databases that are designed to experts from all levels of government and provide secure data storage and interested stakeholders, including maintenance. Those databases are recommendations on what constitutes already burdensome and expensive for reasonable data practices request and cities to maintain but are not available in when a data practices request is unduly a form in which public and private data burdensome. can be easily separated. Requiring cities to design such databases to accommodate DP-4. Maintaining Government extensive data requests under MGDPA is Data in Large Databases both financially and technologically challenging to achieve. Issue: The Minnesota Department of Administration Advisory Opinion 10-016 The Legislature should address the issued in June 2010 maintains that the growing and costly impact on cities of Minnesota Government Data Practices Act providing access to specific public data (MGDPA) requires cities to keep records housed in large electronic databases. containing public government data so that they can be easily accessible and convenient DP-5. Sharing of Student Data with to use, regardless of how they are kept. Local Law Enforcement in Cities maintain that the application of this Emergencies advisory opinion to large databases in which records are kept in an electronic format Issue: Minn. Stat. § 13.32, subd. 3(1), forces cities to risk the daily threat of defines education data as private data that allegations of noncompliance or leaves local must not be disclosed except to the juvenile government officials confused regarding justice system in cases where information how to apply the requirement for access to about the behavior of a student who poses a data in circumstances where information risk of harm is reasonably necessary to technology is utilized to facilitate the protect the health or safety of the student or management and organization of records other individuals. In addition, the federal and information which often includes public, Family Education Rights &Privacy Act private, and nonpublic data within individual (FERPA) bars schools from disclosing data sets. information on student educational records that contains personally identifiable In addition, large databases today contain information without consent of a parent or different forms of data, including video, eligible student, with only limited audio, images, and social media. In exceptions. responding to data practices requests, 135 Minn. Stat. § 13.32 does not adequately victim or witness to prevent the disclosure define who is responsible for making the of public data unless the law enforcement determination that an emergency or risk of agency determines that revealing the identity harm exists. As a result, school district will not threaten the victim or witness's officials have interpreted the statute in personal safety or property. However, conjunction with the restrictions in FERPA victims and their families can be traumatized to require that the determination be made by the events that caused their injuries, even solely by school officials. when their safety or property is not threatened. Publicly disclosing their Local police officials are often frustrated in identities and the location where they are their efforts to investigate allegations of receiving medical care places a burden on criminal or other illegal activity when school families and victims who may be questioned officials refuse,under Minn. Stat. § 13.32, by reporters, solicited by lawyers, and subd. 3(1), and FERPA, to provide contacted by other members of the information to follow up such complaints or community. While there are legitimate to assist local police in solving crimes that public policy reasons to make this have already taken place. information public, the MGDPA provides no discretion for city officials and law School boards are responsible to have enforcement to temporarily withhold victim policies in place that require school officials data when releasing it is not in the best to report a student who possesses an interest of the victims. This not only makes unlawful firearm to law enforcement or the the initial period of recovery more difficult juvenile justice system. But schools are not for victims but erodes the trust between allowed to release the name of a student in victims and state and local government. dangerous weapon reports involving use or possession of such weapons that are made to Response: The Legislature should amend the Minnesota Department of Education. Minn. Stat. § 13.82 to allow law enforcement agencies to temporarily Response: Minn. Stat. § 13.32 should be withhold the disclosure of data that clarified to allow local law enforcement identifies victims and casualties and the agencies to work with school officials to medical facilities to which they are taken jointly make the determination that an if the agency reasonably determines that emergency or risk of harm exists in order access to the data would cause emotional to enable police enforcement actions to be harm to the individual or otherwise taken in a timely manner. impede the individual's recovery. The Legislature should also amend Minn. DP-6. Disclosure of Victim Data Stat. 13.82 to clearly and permanently prohibit the disclosure of traffic accident Issue:Under the Minnesota Government victim identity, similar to the protections Data Practices Act(MGDPA), the name and for crime victims. address of a victim or casualty of an accident or incident to which a law DP-7. Challenges to the Accuracy of enforcement agency responds is public Data government data. In addition, the name and location of the health care facility to which Issue: The Minnesota Government Data victims or casualties are taken is public Practices Act (MGDPA) allows the subject government data. The MGDPA allows a of government data to challenge the 136 accuracy or completeness of data maintained have the right to submit evidence and call by the government entity. If the government witnesses at taxpayer expense. entity denies the challenge, the Act allows the data subject to appeal that determination This right of review is in addition to any through a contested case proceeding under union grievance process and can be the Administrative Procedures Act(APA). exercised by an employee before or after such a grievance is undertaken. This process In the human resources context, a can result in conflicting decisions and has performance evaluation is a tool used to the potential to create a heavy burden on all document and evaluate employee job levels of government and impose significant performance. Performance evaluations are costs on taxpayers. not discipline; however, some jurisdictions and some union contracts have appeal Response: In light of the Schwanke processes to challenge a performance decision, the Legislature should modify evaluation. Performance evaluations are the data challenge provision of Minn. normally conducted once a year. Stat. § 13.04, subd. 4, to balance the rights of data subjects to challenge the accuracy The Minnesota Supreme Court has held that and completeness of data with the a public employee could use the MGDPA to administrative and financial burdens on challenge the accuracy of certain local governments and taxpayers. information contained in the employee's performance evaluation. Schwanke v. Minn. DP-8. Law Enforcement Dept. of Admin., 851 N.W. 2d 591 (Minn. Technologies 2014). While the Court held that "dissatisfaction with a subjective judgment Issue: To aid law enforcement in work, law or opinion cannot support a challenge under enforcement agencies need the flexibility to the [MGDPA]," a data subject can still effectively use all available tools, including challenge data that supports the subjective technology, in a manner that balances judgment. There is currently no limitation privacy interests of citizens, transparency of on when a performance evaluation challenge their work, and costs related to these may be brought. Often there is no retention technologies. The Legislature has balanced period for the underlying data because it is these concerns in the recent License Plate rarely an official record. Furthermore, the Readers law and the Police-Worn Body more time that passes, the less likely those Camera law. with the knowledge of a given performance evaluation may be still employed by the city. License Plate Readers (LPRs) are an It is to everyone's benefit to have the important tool that assist law enforcement challenge to accuracy of data conducted as agencies in locating wanted individuals, soon as possible. recover stolen vehicles, and many other types of investigations. Nevertheless, the use Under Schwanke, an invalid challenge to a of this technology raises legitimate privacy subjective opinion can no longer be concerns. In 2015, the Legislature passed dismissed by the Department of compromise legislation regulating the use of Administration; it can only be dismissed in a LPRs, the classification of LPR data, and the contested-case proceeding. In even a retention period for LPR data that struck a frivolous challenge the data subject will fair balance between the need for robust law enforcement and individual privacy rights. 137 Police-worn body cameras (or portable served, and costs and benefits of recording systems)provide invaluable technology. evidence when investigating crimes and prosecuting criminals and strengthened trust DP-9. Body-Worn Cameras of citizens in law enforcement by increasing the accountability between peace officers Issue: Police-worn body cameras (or and the public. Different than other kinds of portable recording systems)provide data, body camera data use involves the invaluable evidence when investigating unique complexities of the sensitive nature crimes and prosecuting criminals and in its use in private homes as well as the strengthen trust of citizens in law sheer volume of data in daily use. In 2016, enforcement by increasing the accountability the Legislature contemplated all of these between peace officers and the public. issues and passed compromise legislation Different than other kinds of data, body- regulating use of body cameras, camera data use involves the unique classification of body camera data, retention complexities of the sensitive nature in its use period for body camera data, release of body in private homes as well as the sheer volume camera data, audit requirements, and written of data in daily use. In 2016, the Legislature policy requirements. contemplated all of these issues and passed compromise legislation regulating use of The Legislature has recently engaged in body cameras, classification of body camera conversation about other types of law data, retention period for body camera data, enforcement technology, such as drones, release of body camera data, audit facial recognition, etc. requirements, and written policy requirements. Response: Cities and/or law enforcement agencies should be allowed to decide In July 2021, the Minnesota Chiefs of Police whether to utilize technology and be given Association found that more than 100 the flexibility to decide how they are used municipal police departments in Minnesota in the field. use body-worn camera technology. The use has nearly doubled in the last five years, and a) The League supports the continued more police departments are considering use of License Plate Readers under the deploying body-worn cameras in the near terms of the 2015 legislation and future. opposes any further restrictions on their use or any reduction in the The longer body-camera technology is used current 60-day retention period. in Minnesota, the more nuanced questions have become. For example, the Legislature b) With emerging law enforcement recently has engaged in more discussion technologies,the League supports a about how law enforcement uses body- balanced approach to the values of camera technology, when the data should be privacy for citizens,transparency of released, etc. Cities have found redaction for the work of law enforcement, and private data and non-public data to be more discretion to determine what extensive than anticipated, particularly as technologies will be used, such as data practices requests for body-camera data effective use of these technologies, have grown larger in scope and breadth and functional accuracy, emerging law the number of first responders, such as city enforcement needs, communities and county firefighters,paramedics, and 138 mental health professionals, responding to remote participation under the Open calls has increased as well. Meeting Law,while addressing the public's needs to be fully informed of city Response: The League supports the decision-making and to have the continued use of police-worn body opportunity to present views to the public cameras under the terms of the 2016 body. legislation. However,if the Legislature makes changes to the body-worn camera The League opposes any change to the law,the League encourages the Open Meeting Law that would expand Legislature to update the law by the award of attorney's fees to adequately balancing the competing unintentional violations. values of transparency of police work, privacy interests of data subjects, and DP-11. Needed Closed Meeting integrity of police investigations. Exceptions to the Open Meeting Law DP-10. Open Meeting Law Issue: The League of Minnesota Cities Issue: The purpose of the Open Meeting supports the Open Meeting Law and Law generally requires that all meetings of recognizes the important role it plays in public bodies must be open to the public. maintaining the public trust and the This presumption of openness serves three accountability of elected officials. The Open vital purposes: to prohibit actions from Meeting Law must, however, balance the being taken at secret meetings, to assure the need for public information and the need to public's right to be fully informed, and to protect privacy rights and certain negotiation afford the public an opportunity to present strategies to protect the use of public views to the public body. resources. Currently, there are seven Technology has outpaced the Open Meeting exceptions to the open meeting laws that Law. Recent city response to COVID-19 has authorize the closure of meeting to the illustrated that remote participation for public. Under these exceptions, some meetings can allow for meaningful meetings may be closed at the discretion of interaction with the city and the public. the governing body and some must be While the legislature recently changed the closed. Two challenges exist with current law to allow for greater participation by law. interactive technology when a state of The first concern is the hiring process for emergency has been declared, this change management level positions. While existing was for a limited amount of time. Cities are law allows a governing body to close a in need of greater flexibility now to utilize meeting to evaluate the performance of an technology for meetings to protect the health individual subject to its authority, the statute of elected officials, city staff, and the public. doesn't grant the same level of privacy for Cities also need to keep pace with the virtual the city council and prospective applicants. world by having discretion to use remote The statute should allow a governing body technology in the future. to close a meeting to interview applicants Response: The League of Minnesota for employment if there is a quorum present; and, to allow a governing body to close a Cities encourages the Legislature to meeting to discuss the terms of an authorize cities greater flexibility to allow 139 employment agreement to offer to a candidates for management-level candidate to whom a job offer has been positions such as city manager, extended. This would be consistent with the administrator, clerk-treasurer, city existing authority for the governing body to attorney, superintendent, or close a meeting to discuss labor negotiations department head, and to close a strategy. Allowing a closed meeting so that a meeting to evaluate and discuss the council can discuss the results of an candidates, and discuss salary and interview process for a management-level benefit negotiations. position will allow council members to express opinions or ask questions they may b) To allow a governing body to close a have concerns about discussing in a public meeting to discuss negotiation meeting and preserves the integrity of the strategies for proposed contracts interview process of subsequent candidates. and/or agreements with private parties, non-profit organizations, The second concern with existing law is the and/or public entities and keep that inability for public bodies to conduct data private or nonpublic until the strategic negotiations. Current law allows contract is signed by the governing the public body to close a meeting to discuss body or a decision is made to abandon the purchase or sale of property and labor a contract for those goods or services. negotiations but does not allow the public body to close a meeting to discuss Such closed meetings should follow the negotiation strategies for an agreement with same or similar procedures for private parties, non-profit organizations, conducting closed meetings currently and/or public entities. The ability for public required under the Open Meeting Law. bodies to close meetings in these situations provides public bodies the opportunity to DP-12. Remote Participation under form strategies in the best financial interest the Open Meeting Law of the community, which is consistent with the importance of negotiation regarding Issue: The League of Minnesota Cities purchase or sale of property and labor supports the Open Meeting Law and contracts. Further, the City may create recognizes the important role it plays in documents outlining the negotiation maintaining the public trust and the strategy, which should be protected for the accountability of elected officials. The Open same reasons as for closing the meeting. Meeting Law must, however, balance the Such data should be protected during need for public information and the need to negotiations of the contract until a contract effectively run meetings. City for the goods or services is signed or councilmembers, along with advisory board abandoned, which is similar to the and commission members, from time to time protection allowed for request for proposals want to remotely participate in meetings as under Minn. Stat. § 13.591. may be needed. While cities want these members to participate in city business to Response: The Legislature should amend their fullest extent, it is also important to the Open Meeting Law: protect the public's right to see how government works. Currently under the a) To allow a governing body or a interactive technology exception to the Open committee created by a governing Meeting Law in Minn. Stat. § 13D.02, subd. body to close a meeting to interview 1, members of public bodies can remotely 140 participate in meetings if they meet certain their remote location open and accessible requirements: (1) all members, wherever to the public as otherwise required under their physical location, can hear and see one Minn. Stat. § 13D.02, subd. 1.In light of another and can hear and see all discussion the other safeguards in state law to ensure and testimony presented; (2) members of the transparency,the Legislature should also public present at the regular meeting amend the Open Meeting Law to allow location of the body can hear and see all the medical exception to be used without discussion and testimony and all votes of the the declaration of a state of emergency, members of the body; (3) at least one and the Legislature should remove the member of the public body is physically three-times-per-year cap for the medical present at the regular meeting location; and and military exceptions. (4) each location at which a member is present is open and accessible to the public. Federal Employment Law The current law allows an exemption from this last requirement if a member(1) is in FED-1. Consolidated Omnibus the military and deployed and(2) has been Budget Reconciliation Act medically advised not to be in a public place (COBRA) for medical reasons when a state of emergency has been declared. The military Issue: The federal Consolidated Omnibus and medical exceptions may only be used Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA) law, three times per year. which requires employers to offer continued health and dental insurance group benefits On occasion, members of public bodies want to remotely attend meetings, but when after an employee terminates, has been interpreted to apply to Employee Assistance members have made their remote location Programs (EAPs)which provide any form of "open and accessible,"no city resident medical care, including short term shows up at the remote location. COVID-19 counseling for drug and alcohol addiction. has taught us that remote participation can The application of COBRA to these allow for meaningful remote participation programs results in unlikely and impractical and public interaction. However, members outcomes and reduces the likelihood that of public bodies may want to fulfill their employers will make them available. Final responsibility despite medical reasons regulations issued in 2014 exempt EAPs that outside of a state of emergency, travel due to do not provide "significant benefits in the work, or personal travel. Removing the nature of medical care," including EAPs that requirement for remote locations to be "open provide short term drug and alcohol and accessible to the public" still preserves counseling, from requirements of the Patient the public's ability to hear and see all Protection and Affordable Care Act(ACA). discussion, testimony, and voting by all participating members while allowing Response: Congress should clarify that willing members to participate in city EAPs which do not provide significant business. benefits in the nature of medical care are not subject to COBRA. Response: The Legislature should amend the Open Meeting Law to allow city councilmembers and city board/commission members to participate in meetings without making 141 FED-2. Flexible Spending Accounts FED-3. IRS Regulations on Death Benefits Issue: Health care costs are rising dramatically and employees need financial Issue: Current IRS regulations do not allow relief. Flexible spending accounts provide any type of death benefit to be included in a some relief, but the current"use it or lose it" health reimbursement arrangement(HRA) provision for medical spending discourages or tax-free, account-based group health employees from participating in this plans. If a participant of the HRA or program. Though the IRS permits account-based group health plan dies, they carryovers of up to $500, employers that cannot leave the remaining funds to a offer this option may not offer the 2 1/2 designated beneficiary unless the beneficiary month grace period after the end of the plan is a spouse or dependent child who remains year to incur eligible expenses. The enrolled in the HRA. Public sector HRAs Consolidated Appropriations Act(CAA) are often treated as fully vested even when provides temporary relief, allowing unfunded. If the employee does not have a employers to permit employees to carry over spouse or dependent child, the funds revert all or some of their unused health and/or to the employer(who may then credit the dependent care FSA funds from a plan year balance among plan participants). A death ending in 2020 or 2021. benefit provision is an attractive feature for many employee groups. In 2008, Section In addition, the $5,000 annual maximum 105 of the Internal Revenue Code was limit on dependent care accounts has not amended, with a further amendment in 2015, increased substantially since the program's to include limited exceptions to this general inception in 1986 and childcare costs rule but not all city plans meet the continue to rise significantly. The American requirements of these limited exceptions. Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARP)provides temporary relief, increasing the annual Response: Congress should amend maximum limit for dependent care to Section 105 of the Internal Revenue Code $10,500 for taxable years beginning after to allow all HRAs and account-based December 31, 2020, and before January 1, health plans for both active employees 2022. and retirees to include a provision that allows the employee to designate Response: The League of Minnesota beneficiaries other than spouses and Cities supports legislation that would dependents. Such beneficiaries should be make permanent the changes in the CAA able to, at a minimum, receive to allow employees to roll all unused reimbursement for their medical expenses funds in a health or dependent care from the inherited account. flexible spending account into the next plan year, or to allow unused funds to be FED-4. Federal Public Safety contributed into a tax-qualified retirement plan, or a 457 plan. The Collective Bargaining Bill League of Minnesota Cities also supports Issue: Congress is considering a bill that making permanent the $10,500 maximum would require all states to establish limit for dependent care accounts,with a collective bargaining procedures for all cost-of-living inflationary increase each public safety employees. The bill directs the year after the initial adjustment. Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA) 142 to determine, state by state, whether it meets parents' insurance and do not need the the bill's requirements with regard to coverage through the city, which results in collective bargaining rights for public sector wasted effort. employees. While it appears Minnesota is likely to pass the tests set out by the bill, Response: The League of Minnesota federal public sector lobbyists have Cities supports the intent of the ACA to expressed serious concern that the bill is provide affordable health care coverage very much open to interpretation. In to all Minnesota residents. However, addition, the bill directs the FLRA to Congress should: "consider and give weight, to the maximum extent practicable, to the opinion of affected a) Exempt(from the offer of coverage employee organizations." requirements) employees under age 26 who are covered by their parents' Response: The League of Minnesota insurance; Cities opposes the federal collective bargaining bill for public sector b) Exempt(from the offer of coverage employees. Public sector collective requirements) employees who work in bargaining should be left to the recreational facilities and programs determination of each state. owned and operated by governmental entities; and FED-5. Federal Health Care Reform c) Exempt elected officials from being counted as "employees" for the Issue: Certain provisions of the Patient purposes of the ACA. Protection and Affordable Care Act FED-6. Amended Internal Revenue (commonly referred to as the federal health care reform law or Affordable Care Act Code Regarding 403(b) Retirement (ACA)) are problematic for cities. These Plans issues range from administratively difficult to very costly. Tracking employee hours, Issue: Section 403(b)(1)(A)(ii) of the particularly hours of seasonal and temporary Internal Revenue Code allows an employer employees and council members, is that is a State, a political subdivision of a burdensome and will require significant State, or an agency or instrumentality of a administrative time and effort. Because most State or a political subdivision of a State to of these employees will not qualify for establish a 403(b)retirement plan for coverage under the ACA, the effort does not employees who perform services for result in a worthwhile outcome. There are educational organizations as described in also situations where employees who are Section 170(b)(1)(A)(ii) of the Internal currently working more than 30 hours per Revenue Code. This provision of the week in a city will now be eligible for health Internal Revenue Code allows employees to care coverage by that city, which will drive defer substantially more income for up city costs significantly, particularly for retirement savings than their city cities using the"duty crew" concept at fire government employee counterparts. While stations to ensure adequate daytime government employees who do not perform response. Finally, there are provisions which services for an educational organization may require the city to offer coverage to full-time participant in a 457(b) deferred students who are already covered by their compensation plan, they may not participate 143 in a 403(b)retirement plan. Government retroactively up to six months before the employees who perform services for an month in which the application is filed educational organization are able to (depending on the date on which the participate in both a 403(b)plan and a individual first become eligible for Medicare 457(b) deferred compensation coverage) as described in 42 CFR §406.6(d). plan. Furthermore, as a result of the The IRS has indicated that the monthly amendment to Section 457(c) of the Internal limitation on HSA contributions included in Revenue Code by the Economic Growth and Section 223(b)(7) applies during any Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001, retroactive period of Medicare coverage. deferrals to a 457(b)plan are not This rule is confusing to employees, coordinated with elective deferrals made to a employers, and benefit administrators and 403(b)plan for purposes of complying with may lead to unintended and unexpected tax the limit on pre-tax contributions to either consequences for employees and employers plan. Both employee groups serve the public who may not be aware at the time an HSA and should be treated similarly under the contribution is made that the monthly Internal Revenue Code for purposes of tax- limitation for that month will be zero if the deferred retirement savings plans." employee applies for Medicare within the following six months and the coverage is Response: Congress should amend effective retroactively under this rule. Section 403(b)(1)(A)(ii) of the Internal Furthermore, if an employer provides Revenue Code to allow an employer that contributions to an HSA as part of its benefit is a State, a political subdivision of a package, then the rule may limit the benefits State, or an agency or instrumentality of a an active employee can receive from their State or political subdivision to establish a employer. 403(b) plan for all of its employees, regardless of whether they perform Response: Congress should amend services for an educational organization. Section 223(b)(7) of the Internal Revenue Code to provide that the limitation on FED-7. Amended Internal Revenue contributions to a health savings account Code Regarding Health Savings for any month with respect to any Account Eligibility and Medicare individual shall be zero for each month Enrollment beginning with the later of(i)the first month in which such individual is entitled Issue: Section 223(b)(7) of the Internal to benefits under title XVIII of the Social Revenue Code provides that the monthly Security Act or(ii) the month in which limitation on contributions to a health such individual submits a valid savings account(HSA) is zero starting with application for benefits under title XVIII the first month in which an individual is of the Social Security Act. entitled to Medicare benefits. A person becomes entitled to Medicare benefits when their Medicare coverage becomes effective. In many cases, Medicare coverage is effective on a retroactive basis. Specifically, when an individual is required to submit an application for Medicare coverage, the Medicare coverage will be effective 144 IMPROVING FISCAL FUTURES FF-1. State-Local Fiscal Relations retroactive adjustments to local government aid (LGA) and similar Issue: Since the 1970s, services provided by programs, unallotments of the Minnesota cities have been largely funded appropriation and the imposition of levy through a combination of property taxes, limits do not facilitate prudent financial state aids, and state property tax relief planning and decisions. In addition, programs. This system of municipal finance during a past state government shutdown has evolved to ensure that municipal the Department of Revenue indicated that services can be funded without excessive despite the standing LGA appropriation, local tax burdens. the shutdown of many state government operations would prevent the distribution Over the past decade, the state-local of the LGA. partnership has vacillated with the state budget, challenging the ability of city Adequacy. The revenue sources available officials to plan for the future fiscal needs of to cities and the state must raise adequate their communities. funds to meet city needs,to fund mandates, and to maintain Minnesota's Response: The League of Minnesota long-term competitiveness. Cities supports a strong state-local fiscal partnership. The state-local fiscal system, Flexibility. As cities become increasingly and any future modifications, should be diverse in their characteristics and as consistent with the following principles: existing aid and credit programs have eroded, a "one-size-fits-all" system that Accountability. Cities believe a viable limits all cities to the property tax as the partnership with the state requires cities major, non-state aid revenue source is and the state to communicate effectively increasingly unworkable. Some cities with each other and with the public about have sufficient property tax base to their roles and responsibilities. Cities and sustain an adequate service level,but the state must also exercise sound many do not. Cities should have greater financial stewardship, including access to other tax and revenue sources maximizing efficiencies in service delivery than currently permitted. and other means of cost containment whenever possible. Equity. All citizens should receive adequate levels of municipal services at Certainty. Cities need to have more relatively similar levels of taxation. This certainty and predictability in all of their means that the state should provide available revenue sources,including the financial assistance to cities that have property tax, the amount of funding they high costs,including costs related to receive from local government aid and overburden created by non-resident users similar programs and from other sources of city services, low fiscal capacity, or of revenue. The past practice of 145 both. State financial assistance should and should make steps to reverse past also reduce tax burden disparities among accelerations; communities and between cities and surrounding areas. d) Must consider the aggregate impact on Minnesota taxpayers of previous FF-2. State Budget Stability budget cuts and tax increases; Issue: Legislative actions to address past e) Must reinstate detailed estimates of state budget deficits have included inflationary increases to expenditure permanent reductions in funding to local estimates in the state budget forecast; units of government for programs such as local government aid as well as the full 0 Should maintain a budget reserve as elimination of programs such as the market recommended by Minnesota value homestead credit. In addition, the Management and Budget based on Legislature has frequently relied on short- their assessment of volatility in term solutions that have only shifted a large Minnesota's revenue system defined in share of the deficit problem into the next Minn. Stat. §16A.152, subd. 8 with a biennium without permanently addressing minimum of a five percent reserve; the state budget problems. g) Should modify the unallotment statute The legislature has taken steps to reduce to place a reasonable statutory limit state budget volatility. As required under on the percentage and timing of the Minn. Stat. § 16A.152, subd. 1, 33 percent state's budget that can be unallotted of any state general fund budget surplus during a biennium without legislative identified in the November state budget approval; and forecast must be directed to the state budget reserve until the account reaches a targeted h) Must emphasize long-term budget level. solutions and budget stability and the continuation of both state and local Response: To increase the stability of the government operations. state budget and avoid or reduce the impact of future state budget deficits, the i) The League of Minnesota Cities Legislature• supports the principle of • representative democracy and opposes a) Must consider all budget stabilizing limiting the Legislature's flexibility in options,including revenue increases, making financial decisions through with a particular focus on changes new Constitutional amendments. that improve the stability of the state's revenue stream; FF-3. Funding Local Government Aid b) Must not further reduce funding for property tax relief programs to cities Issue: Local government aid(LGA) is an and taxpayers; important component in the state's property tax relief system, and a critical tool to help c) Must not accelerate the remittance of equalize tax base to ensure needs for public sales tax collections by retailers services can be met. To avoid undue including municipal liquor operations, pressure on the property tax, funding for 146 LGA must keep pace with inflationary current distribution occurs late in the city pressures. The 2021 legislature added $5.5 fiscal year and can create short-term cash million in one-time supplemental aid to flow challenges for some cities. offset any LGA formula reductions for 96 cities with the expectation that the Current law (Minn. Stat. § 477A.017, subd. legislature would update the formula during 3)prohibits the distribution of LGA and the 2022 session. The legislature did not Small Cities Assistance Account funding approve a formula update and the (Minn. Stat. § 162.145) to cities that have supplemental aid has now sunset. not complied with all financial reporting requirements to the Office of the State For 2023, the total unmet formula need(the Auditor. Frequently, failure to comply is due difference between each city's formula- to factors outside the control of the city. determined need and ability to raise Although many cities subsequently comply revenue) is $767.9 million, leaving the and seek special legislation to receive the current formula appropriation $203.5 withheld LGA, the growing regularity of the million below the total unmet need. legislature's failure to approve tax bills has jeopardized the restoration of these In recent years, bills have been introduced payments. that would have created offsets to a city's LGA distribution if the city imposed a local Response: In order to reduce pressure on sales tax, spent funds for activities related to the property tax, and to equalize property lobbying or a World's Fair, or would have tax bases,the League of Minnesota Cities reduced or eliminated LGA if the city continues to support the LGA formula as enacted ordinances to ban plastic bags, the appropriate mechanism to distribute impose certain local labor laws, ordinances, LGA resources. In addition, the League or policies that restrict city employees from supports: enforcing immigration laws, unauthorized ordinances related to diversion programs. a) Regular increases in the LGA Such changes would have been a significant appropriation deviation from the practice of using the formula to distribute LGA and could have b) Updating the LGA formula, including jeopardized the long-term stability of the the "need" formula factors, the program. appropriation increase and other modifications consistent with the most For 2019 only, the Legislature included a recent recommendations of the city one-time payment acceleration that association LGA working group distributed 14.6 percent of each city's 2019 established in 2021; LGA by June 15, with a second payment of 35.4 percent on July 20 and a final payment c) Restoring the annual inflation of 50 percent on December 26. For 2020 and adjustment to the LGA program to beyond, LGA payments will again be made move toward funding the total unmet to cities in two equal installments on July 20 need of all cities. and December 26 each year. In 2022, the House omnibus tax bill would have d) Permanently accelerating of the dedicated a portion of future state budget annual LGA payment schedule to surpluses to phase-in an acceleration of the assist cities with cash flow needs. July 20 LGA distribution to March 15. The 147 e) Establishing an administrative FF-5. Reporting Requirements procedure that would allow cities that ultimately comply with financial Issue: Budget and financial reporting reporting requirements to receive requirements imposed on cities by the state their withheld aid distributions. often result in duplication and additional costs. In addition to the state mandated The League opposes targeting reductions annual audits under Minn. Stat. §§ 471.697- to specific cities or groups of cities as well .698, cities are required to prepare and as reductions or offsets for local policy or submit or publish numerous other budget expenditure decisions. and financial reports including but not limited to: The legislature should avoid creating side-pots or special appropriations a) Summary budget reports (Minn. Stat. § through the LGA(Minn. Stat. ch. 477A) 6.745); program. If special circumstances such as a natural disaster warrant additional b) Summary budget information for the state assistance to specific cities,the proposed budget, which is sent to the criteria for the additional aid should be county for the annual tax hearing process specifically enumerated and the (Minn. Stat. § 275.065, subd. 3b); appropriation should be separate and in addition to the appropriation through the c) Treasurers report to the city clerk(Minn. general LGA formula. Stat. § 412.141); FF-4. State Charges for d) Statement of tax collections and other Administrative Services income by clerk to the city council (Minn. Stat. § 471.69); Issue: Currently, some state agencies have wide discretion in setting the fees for special e) Report on outstanding obligations and services they provide to local governments. the purpose for each issue filed with the county auditor(Minn. Stat. § 471.70); Response: State agencies should be required to justify their service fees or for f) Publication of summary budget increases in existing service fees and not statement(Minn. Stat. § 471.6965); charge more than what is fair, reasonable, g) Publication of statement of liquor store and proportionate to the cost of service. operations (Minn. Stat. § 477A.017); Agencies should give adequate notice of increases to allow local governments to h) Liquor store audited financial statements budget for the increases. State agencies (Minn. Stat. § 471.6985); should set administrative service fees as close as possible to the marginal cost of i) TIF district plan and amendments (Minn. providing the service. Local government Stat. § 469.175, subd. 4a); should be given the option to self- administer or contract with the private j) TIF district annual disclosure (Minn. sector for the service if the state cannot Stat. § 469.175, subd. 5); provide the service at a reasonable cost. k) TIF district annual financial report (Minn. Stat. § 469.175, subd. 6); 148 1) Business subsidy reporting (Minn. Stat. legislature should consolidate municipal §§ 116J.993-.995); government financial reporting requirements in the Office of State m) State required financial activity reports Auditor, include an electronic submission (Minn. Stat. § 6.74); alternative to any remaining paper filing requirements and authorize the use of n) Local improvement requirements (Minn. web publication where newspaper Stat. § 429.031); publication is currently required. o) Development and permit fees report Finally, the legislature must not increase (Minn. Stat. § 326B.145); reporting burdens for local units of government.Any new reporting p) Utility annual financial statements requirement should have a clearly defined (Minn. Stat. § 412.381); statement of purpose and public need not q) Housing and redevelopment authority currently met with existing reports, a annual financial report(Minn. Stat. § sunset date to facilitate a future 469.013); and discussion of the usefulness of the requirement as well as full state funding r) Federal single audit or a program- for the costs associated with a new specific audit(31 U.S.C. § 7502 (a)(1)). reporting mandate. s) A temporary reporting requirement for FF-6. Taxation Duplication the federal American Recovery Plan Act distributions. Issue: In Minnesota, local governments occasionally provide residents and Many cities have expanded the availability businesses similar types of services. For of information on their web sites in response example, counties maintain a sheriff's office to citizen requests and some cities have while in many cities,police services are begun using new tools to assist citizens in provided by the city to their residents and understanding the city budget. Expanding businesses. When the county levy for the state mandated financial reporting sheriff's operations is spread across the requirements could force cities to redirect county, city residents and businesses are scarce resources to the state mandate and being taxed for services that are not being stifle innovative ways to communicate with provided within the city or are being citizens. provided at a lower level. Response: Requirements for reporting Similarly, in some areas, the county and advertising financial and budget provides 9-1-1 dispatching services funded information should be carefully weighed through the property tax that is spread across to balance the need for information with the county but the county may also require the administrative costs of compiling and cities to contribute to the 9-1-1 operations submitting this information. In addition, through the city budget and property tax the legislature should direct all state levy. As a result, city businesses and agencies to review existing local residents are effectively paying twice for government reporting mandates and dispatch services—once through the county eliminate redundant or superfluous levy and again through the city levy. requirements. To this point, the 149 Response:Where similar services are reimbursements to local units of provided by different levels of local government can be cut while the credit to government, property tax levies for those the taxpayer remains on the property tax services should only apply to those areas statement. In addition,the League receiving the service. Additionally, opposes reinstituting Limited Market counties should be prohibited from Value, a program that reduces the taxable requiring cities to contribute to services value of individual properties based on that are being funded through the county- assessor's valuation increase or freezes in wide property tax levy. property valuations. Limited Market Value or a valuation freeze create FF-7. Direct Property Tax Relief property tax shifts and tax burden Programs inequities between similar properties. Issue: In 2013, the legislature expanded the FF-8. Sales Tax on Local homeowner property tax refund(PTR) Government Purchases program and renamed it the Homestead Credit Refund program. As a direct taxpayer Issue: The local government sales tax relief program, the Homestead Credit exemption enacted in 2013 and expanded in Refund avoids the problems with the former 2014 does not apply to all city purchases. Market Value Homestead Credit system Some purchases for municipal enterprise where the state provided a credit on the operations, such as liquor stores and golf homeowner's property tax statement but did courses are excluded from the exemption. In not always reimburse cities and counties for addition, in order to receive the sales tax the amount of the credit. exemption on construction materials under current law, cities must bid labor and Response: The League of Minnesota materials separately and also designate a Cities supports providing additional, contractor to be a purchasing agent on direct property tax relief through an behalf of the city. The existing Department expansion of the Homestead Credit of Revenue rules (Minn. Rule 8130.1200, Refund program,the renters' refund subp. 3) are complex and the program,the targeting program or other implementation can be so complicated that it programs that provide property tax relief can cost cities more money to implement directly from the state to taxpayers. In than they will save on the tax exemption. addition, the League supports the 2013 Finally, although cities currently do not pay legislation that requires the Department the motor vehicle sales tax on marked police of Revenue to notify potentially eligible vehicles or firefighting vehicles, other city homeowners of the program and would vehicles are not exempt from the motor also support legislative modifications to vehicle sales tax. these programs to eliminate the taxpayer filing requirement thereby making the tax The 2021 legislature extended the sales tax relief payments automatic. refund process under Minn. Stat. § 297A.71 and Minn. Stat. § 297A.75 to contractor The League opposes property tax credit purchases of construction materials, supplies programs that reimburse local units of and equipment incorporated into public government for reduced tax burden such safety buildings for initial construction, as the former market value homestead remodeling, expansion and improvements credit system due to the fact that the for public safety facilities owned by local 150 units of government. The refund process on retailers. The success of this project was also applies to materials used in related referenced in the Wayfair decision. facilities such as access roads, lighting, sidewalks and utility components. Despite the Supreme Court's Wayfair decision, new legal challenges could be filed Response: In order to ensure that by remote retailers or Congress could taxpayers receive the full benefit of the intervene to address remaining sales tax local government sales tax exemption: administration issues including the fact that more than 20 states with sales taxes have not a) The exemption should apply to all adopted the SSUTP standards. purchases made by local units of government; Response: Federal tax policy should not place main street businesses at a b) The process to receive the exemption competitive disadvantage to electronic for construction materials used in retailers, must not jeopardize repayment local government projects should be of bonds backed by state and local sales simplified or added to the refund tax revenues, and should ensure stability process now available for local in state and local revenues. To address the government public safety facilities; challenges created by the growth of and electronic commerce, the League of Minnesota Cities continues to support the c) The exemption should be extended to multi-state effort to develop a streamlined all local government purchases that sales tax system. would otherwise be subject to the motor vehicle sales tax in Minn. Stat. Should Congress intervene,the League ch. 297B. would support nation-wide sales tax administration standards based on the FF-9. Taxation of Electronic model developed by the Streamlined Sales Commerce Tax Project. The League will oppose Congressional efforts to reverse remote Issue: The 2018 U.S. Supreme Court retailer collection requirements. decision [South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc., 585 U.S. (2018)] overturned two earlier FF-10. Local Lodging Taxes Supreme Court decisions [Quill Corp. v. North Dakota, 504 U.S. 298 (1992) and Issue: In 2011, the legislature amended National Bellas Hess v. Department of Minn. Stat. § 297A.61 to define Revenue, 386 U.S. 753 (1967)] that had accommodation intermediaries and clarified prevented states from requiring retailers that their services are subject to the state without a physical presence from collecting sales tax as part of the tax imposed on state and local sales taxes on purchases lodging. Local lodging taxes collected by made by state residents and businesses. the state for local units of government under Minn. Stat. § 469.190, subd. 7, also clearly A group of 23 states participating in the apply to services provided by these Streamlined Sales Tax Project have worked accommodation intermediaries since these together for more than 18 years to simplify taxes are required under Minn. Stat. § the administration of state and local sales 270C.171 to use the definition for tax base taxes and reduce the administrative burden contained in the general sales tax statute. 151 Since 2011, some accommodation a few IOU shareholders and ratepayers intermediaries have not been collecting and actually live in the communities hosting remitting locally-administered lodging taxes baseload power plants. Further, almost all based on the full cost of the accommodation new power plants receive personal property plus the accommodation intermediary tax exemptions from the Legislature, while services. There are currently 120 cities and host communities with existing, non-exempt towns that individually or jointly impose baseload plants will continue to have them lodging taxes for tourism purposes under for decades to come. Minn. Stat. § 469.190. Another five cities impose a lodging tax that is administered Currently the taxation of electric generation locally under special law. Four local lodging personal property represents the best method taxes are currently administered by the state. for reimbursing host communities for the cost of hosting IOUs. Response: The League of Minnesota Cities supports legislation that will clarify Response: Personal property taxes on that all lodging taxes,whether attached electric generation machinery administered by the state or administered are a fair way to spread the locally, apply to the total charges to the environmental and economic costs of customer,including charges for services electric generation power plants among provided by accommodation all IOU shareholders and ratepayers. The intermediaries. League of Minnesota Cities supports the continuation of personal property taxes FF-11. Taxation of Electric paid by IOUs to host communities for Generation Personal Property existing and new facilities or a tax system which generates equal or greater revenue Issue: Investor-owned utilities (IOUs) have for host communities. If the Department a longstanding relationship with Minnesota of Revenue or the Legislature chooses cities. IOUs site baseload power plants in evaluate new methods of utility taxation, host communities, and in exchange pay the League supports the inclusion of these personal property tax on attached generation environmental and economic costs in machinery to the cities, counties and school assessing the appropriate property taxes districts hosting the plants. These plants paid to host cities by electric generation bring jobs to our communities, but they also facilities. create nuisances such as air pollution, nuclear waste, noise, vibration, and coal FF-12. Electric Generation train traffic. They also create security risks Taxation Reform and take up land that could be used for other, less disruptive commercial and Issue: Currently, electric utilities are subject industrial development. Cities believe to a personal property tax on personal personal property taxes paid by IOUs are a property which is part of an electric fair compensation for the environmental and generating, transmission, or distribution economic costs of hosting baseload power system. This tax has a number of plants. exemptions and exclusions which make a patchwork of taxation statewide. The IOUs argue that personal property tax relief Department of Revenue issued a report on is important to pass along to their February 15, 2015 which laid out the details shareholders and ratepayers. However, only of this tax system, stating, "The utility tax 152 base comprised of these energy producing hopes of identifying improvements that can facilities is not predictable. The benefit both local governments and the unpredictability is a result of law and rule companies subject to personal property taxes changes that determine the amount of utility to increase stability, predictability, and tax base available for host communities." reduce impacts on other taxpayers. Cities which host Investor-Owned Utility Response: The personal property tax on base load power plants have faced electric generation equipment as well as unpredictability in tax base from both the exemptions, exclusions and sliding changes to state law regarding the personal scales to that tax represent a patchwork property tax on electric generation of taxation rules statewide. Changes to equipment and from changes in valuation state law which replace the personal due to the upgrade/depreciation cycle of property tax on electric generation equipment. equipment with a tax base valuation based on electric generation capacity, In the past, the Minnesota Legislature has production, nuclear storage,transmission, considered a reform to the system of taxing and distribution will benefit IOU host electric generation, which would repeal the cities so long as the change comes with a personal property tax and all of its factor to increase the tax base valuation exclusions and exemptions, and replace it over time and reimbursement to cities for with new approaches to valuing utility revenues lost due to a change in state law. property. More recently, the 2021 tax bill Likewise, any changes to process by passed by the legislature ordered the which investor owned utilities appeal the Department of Revenue to initiate a review valuation of their property should be of the framework for valuations of property made with the goal of reducing negative including utility property such as large impacts on local governments, and electric generating facilities. increasing stability, predictability, and transparency. Statutory changes to the system of electric generation taxation should not adversely FF-13. Support for Transitioning affect host city tax revenues. Any proposal Communities to change the system must include some form of replacement aid which compensates Issue: Technological advancements and cities for adverse effects due to changing market forces are rapidly changing the state law on electric generation taxation. electric generation industry. Investor-owned utilities (IOUs) in Minnesota are increasing Moreover, utility company appeals of the share of their electric generation Department of Revenue valuations of utility portfolios that are made up of renewable property can cause significant turmoil for generation sources like wind and solar, local governments, including property tax while planning to decrease the share of shifts onto residents and businesses and—in electric generation that is derived from the case of a successful tax court challenge baseload power plants that produce energy by a utility—the possibility of being forced from coal or nuclear sources. Due to the to pay back taxes that have already been deep and longstanding relationship IOUs collected and spent in prior years. As part if have with some Minnesota cities, the its review of Rule 8100, the Department of possible retirement of these power plants Revenue has engaged with stakeholders in 153 stands to have a significant disruptive effect policy solutions to address the unique on these cities. challenges these communities face. Cities that host baseload power plants make FF-14. Taxation of Municipal Bond significant investments to support those Interest plants, including infrastructure, public safety, and disaster preparedness. To Issue: The federal and state laws that grant a compensate for this, IOUs pay personal tax exemption to bondholders for municipal property tax on electric generation bond interest lowers borrowing costs for machinery. For some cities, these revenues cities and reduces property tax levies. can account for over 50% of the city's Recent proposed Internal Revenue Service annual budget. Moreover, IOUs have other rules would potentially restrict some local significant direct and indirect impacts on government entities such as housing and host communities. IOUs tend to employ redevelopment authorities, economic significant numbers of employees at development authorities and port authorities baseload power plants. Those employees are from issuing tax exempt bonds. likely to live, work, attend school, and shop in and around the local community. Response: Congress and the state should Therefore, the of the retirement of these maintain the tax exemption for municipal plants would have significant negative bond interest income. Congress should impacts on these communities. also clarify the law to supersede proposed IRS rules and thereby continue to allow While the power that is generated at these housing and redevelopment authorities, facilities goes to support the entire state of economic development authorities and Minnesota, the impacts of hosting these port authorities to issue tax exempt debt. plants is felt most acutely in these local communities. In recent years, the State of FF-15. Pollution Control Minnesota has taken steps to support cities Exemption facing these unique circumstances, including the creation of the Community Energy Issue: Minnesota grants electric utilities and Transition Grant Program under Minn. Stat. several other industries a property tax § 116J.551, and the creation of the Energy exemption for personal and real property Transition Office and Advisory Committee that is primarily used for pollution control. under Minn. Stat. § 116J.5491 —5493. Minnesota adopted the property tax exemption that now extends to electrical Response: The League of Minnesota generation systems, agricultural operations, Cities recognizes that the energy and wastewater treatment facilities in 1967, landscape is rapidly changing and before water and air pollution were heavily supports state policies to replace tax base regulated by the Environmental Protection in communities facing the closure of a Agency and the Minnesota Pollution Control baseload power plant, as well as other Agency. The language and the purpose of policies or programs to help those these statutes have evolved through the communities replace their local tax base years. When states first began adopting through economic development. The these tax incentives in the 1960s, they hoped League of Minnesota Cities also support to encourage utilities, industrial plants, and efforts by the state legislature and state others to install pollution control equipment. agencies to study, analyze, and design 154 Gradually, as regulation increased, states on local budgets, ordinances and fees can adopted the exemptions to help companies unnecessarily restrict the abilities of city offset the cost of the equipment. councils to respond to local needs and also have a negative effect on a city's bond rating This tax benefit erodes local tax bases. In due to the restriction on revenue flexibility. 2013, more than$1.8 billion of personal and real property for electrical generation was As city officials try to plan for future local exempted from the market value of utilities. needs, levy limits can be as much a floor as The incentive value of this benefit is low a ceiling on local government levies as local because utility companies are required to officials try to anticipate future state actions install the equipment anyway. In addition, by"levying to the limit"to preserve future these companies frequently recover the cost levy authority. of the equipment through rate riders granted by the Public Utilities Commission. Levy limits also fail to account for the Allowing the pollution control equipment decertification of tax increment financing exemption places the cost of this equipment districts. Upon decertification, the property on the citizens of the host community, rather taxes that were formerly collected and used than the purchasers of electricity. to support the public improvements in the TIF district can no longer be collected at the Response: The pollution control same rate and used to support ongoing exemption places an undue burden on general city operations. host communities without incentivizing the environmentally responsible behavior Response: Local elected officials are that it was originally created to elected to make decisions about local encourage. The League of Minnesota issues and concerns and act to meet Cities supports narrowing or eliminating community needs in the short-term and the pollution control equipment the long-term. City councilmembers and exemption for investor-owned electric city mayors are elected by the citizens of generation facilities. The League would their community to represent them in the also support allowing utilities to continue decision-making processes for and on to recover their costs relating to the behalf of their communities. Those pollution control equipment by spreading elected to serve are best suited to make those costs to electricity users. decisions closest to the people most closely affected. They make decisions about their FF-16. Representative Democracy activities in their city which are reflective and Local Control of their adopted municipal ordinances and annually adopted fee schedules. Local Issue: Local officials are elected by citizens budgets, fees and ordinances are based on to make decisions on behalf of their each particular city's own particular community, including important taxation unique community needs, attributes and and expenditure decisions. At times, the considerations. The League of Minnesota legislature has enacted blunt tools such as Cities supports the principle of levy limits to supersede the discretion of city representative democracy that allows councils. Levy limits replace local local officials to make decisions without accountability with a state judgment about state or other restrictions. the appropriate level of local taxation and local services. Additionally, state restrictions 155 FF-17. Tax Hearing and that the legislative intent is reflected in Notification Process the statutes. Issue: Cities must set a preliminary levy by Specifically, the League of Minnesota September 30, which is the levy used to Cities supports the following: compute the parcel-specific property tax notification forms. With only a few limited a) Modifying Minn. Stat. § 275.065 to exemptions (e.g., voter-approved levies, clearly and fully exclude cities of levies for natural disasters and levies for population 500 and under from the certain tort judgments), this preliminary budget and levy hearing levy, by law, becomes the maximum that requirements; cities can levy the following year. As a b) Reinstating the exception to the tax result, cities may be unable to budget for hearing and notification requirements unforeseen needs that arise after September for cities with more than 500 residents 30. with a proposed levy increase below In 2021, the legislature added Minn. Stat. § the implicit price deflator(IPD); and 275.065, subd. 3b that requires cities over c) The summary budget information 500 population to provide the county with requirement enacted under the 2021 summary budget information consistent with omnibus tax bill should be evaluated the summary budget report submitted to the for effectiveness and value to State Auditor under Minn. Stat. § 6.745 for taxpayers. The requirement should be the proposed budget and the current budget. converted to a suggested option and Although the requirement was delayed until cities should be able to substitute their the process to set 2023 budgets, cities will established local process and format have a new, complicated reporting process to explain their proposed budget to that will add considerable information to the taxpayers. annual proposed property tax statement. In addition, rather than explaining city's In order to assist local officials with the proposed budget, the amount of new challenge of explaining legislative changes information could overwhelm taxpayers. to the property tax system, legislators should attend and be encouraged to Response: Cities should have the participate in local government budget authority to increase the final levy from hearings in their districts. the preliminary levy with the approval of the commissioner of the Department of FF-18. General Election Revenue,to meet additional, unforeseen Requirement for Ballot Questions and uncontrollable needs, including arbitrator awards resulting from labor Issue:Under current state law, when cities negotiations, the impact of new and are required to seek voter approval on a existing federal or state mandates ballot question or where statutes allow including administrative rules, or other voters to petition for an election on a council non-discretionary budget factors. action(reverse referendum), these referenda The tax hearing and notification law can generally be held at a general or special should be carefully reviewed to assure election. This flexibility allows cities to 156 respond to local circumstances in a timely FF-20. Local Option Sales Tax and manner. City Revenue Diversification Response: Cities should be allowed to Issue:Under current state law, the property conduct elections on ballot questions at a tax is the only generally accessible form of date and time set by the city council and local tax revenue for cities. Allowing cities that complies with existing election to diversify their revenue stream would help notification statutes. prevent rapid additional future reliance on FF-19. City Fund Balances the property tax. The basic public finance rationale for Issue:As a component of a prudent diversification of local tax systems is rooted financial management plan, cities maintain a in the fact that economists generally agree fund balance composed of cash flow funds, that there is no perfect tax. Each tax has savings for projects, and rainy-day reserves unique strengths and weaknesses and the to maintain high level bond ratings and to more intensively any single tax type is used, minimize borrowing costs. Although the size the more obvious its shortcomings become. of a city's fund balance should be For example, the property tax is generally determined through local financial needs regarded as being very stable throughout the and local preferences, some cities are being economic cycle and it is considered to be a criticized for maintaining "excessive" relatively easy tax to administer and enforce. reserves. As the recent pandemic unfolded, However, when property tax burdens there were calls to delay tax payments by become too high, there may be negative property owners, citing city fund balances as consequences for other public policy evidence that cities could absorb cash flow objectives such as business development and delays. home ownership. The Office of the State Auditor(OSA) In addition to avoiding the problems created report measures city fund balances on by excessive reliance on any single tax, a December 31, shortly after the city receives balanced and diversified revenue system for its largest sources of revenue from the Minnesota cities may create a more property tax and state aid distributions. favorable business climate and provide for Measuring at this time, however, yields a greater stability of revenues to the recipient picture of a high fund balance even though government unit throughout the course of the city will spend down these funds to cash the economic cycle. flow the next five to six months of its operations. Under Minn. Stat. § 297A.99, the Legislature has created a set of local sales Response: The state should respect local tax rules and a defined process by which decisions on adequacy of local fund cities and other political subdivisions can balances. The League of Minnesota Cities impose a general local option sales tax. opposes any attempt to divert local Although the statutory process requires the reserves to benefit the state budget or use city council to adopt a resolution supporting reserves as a rationale for state aid cuts or the local sales tax, the process continues to property tax payment delays. require the authorization of the local sales tax by the Legislature through the passage of 157 a special law before finally seeking voter a) Convention or civic centers; approval at a general election. b) Public libraries; The 2019 requirement to have separate ballot questions for each project has c) Parks,trails, and recreational challenged cities to draft ballot questions facilities; that are clear to voters. Each question must describe the project and the sales tax that d) Overpasses, arterial and collector will support the proposed project however, roads, or bridges, on, adjacent to, or the requirement could confuse voters that connecting to a Minnesota state each project would result in separate sales highway; tax rate increases that would be cumulative. e) Railroad overpasses or crossing safety Cities are also currently prohibited from improvements; imposing a new sales tax for a period of one-year from the expiration of an existing 0 Transportation infrastructure local sales tax under Minn. Stat. § 297A.99, improvements,including construction, subd. 3(d), which creates an administrative repair of roadways,bridges and challenge for retailers who collect the local airports; sales taxes when local sales taxes blink off g) Flood control and protection; and then on again for a new project. City requests for sales tax authority continue h) Water quality projects to address to increase. In 2019, the legislature granted groundwater and drinking water local sales tax authority to an additional 16 pollution problems; cities and in 2021, an additional 16 cities i) Court facilities; were authorized to conduct a referendum to impose new or expanded local sales taxes. In j) Fire, law enforcement, or public safety 2022, 15 cities followed the process and an facilities; or additional four cities sought adjustments to their local sales taxes initially authorized in k) Municipal buildings. 2021 to cover unexpected cost increases in building materials and interest rates that Local sales taxes would follow the process occurred after their special laws were outlined in Minn. Stat. § 297A.99 but enacted, however, the legislature failed to without the need for the approval by the pass a tax bill and therefore none of the Legislature and governor through the authorizations were enacted. passage of special legislation. Response: Cities should be able to The existing general law governing local diversify their sources of revenues. The sales (Minn. Stat. § 297A.99) should be League of Minnesota Cities continues to modified as follows: support a statutory change to generally allow a city to enact a local sales tax for a) The local referendum requirement public improvements and capital under Minn. Stat. § 297A.99, subd. replacement costs, including but not 3(a) should be clarified to allow the limited to those specified in the 2019 referendum to occur at any November legislation: election, regardless of whether a city 158 has candidates or questions on the local services where benefit or usage of ballot or a special election. the service can be measured. b) The requirement for separate ballot FF-21. City Franchise Authority questions for each proposed project under Minn. Stat. § 297A.99, subd. Issue:Under Minn. Stat. ch. 216B and 3(a) should be clarified, possibly Minn. Stat. § 301B.01, a city may require a through changes to the structure of public utility furnishing gas or electric utility the ballot, to avoid voter confusion. services or occupying streets, highways or Alternatively,the legislature should other public property within a municipality consider allowing a city the option of to obtain a franchise to operate within the combining projects into a single ballot community. In addition, cable system question. operators are required to obtain a franchise under Minn. Stat. ch. 238. c) The current prohibition on imposing a new local sales tax for a period of one- Under a franchise, the city may require the year from the expiration of an existing utility to pay a fee to the municipality to local sales tax under Minn. Stat. § raise revenue or to defray increased 297A.99, subd. 3(d), creates municipal costs, such as maintenance and administrative challenges for retailers reconstruction costs, accruing as a result of and should be repealed. utility operations, or both. d) The general law outlining the local State law currently allows the franchise fee sales tax process or individual special to be based upon gross operating revenues laws should allow a city the flexibility or gross earnings of the utility from its to modify the ballot question to operations in the municipality. In this increase the total amount of the sales manner, all utility users within the tax collected and extend the duration municipality contribute to the public costs of tax to cover unanticipated project associated with the utility operation. In the cost increases. absence of franchise fees, municipal costs resulting from utility operations are State law should also be modified to currently being funded by property generally authorize any city to impose taxpayers. other types of taxes such as a local payroll tax or an entertainment tax with the Many cities also have policies related to adoption of a supporting resolution by the utility company services and products that city council and after approval by the could be supported under conditions of a voters at a general or special election. franchise agreement, such as local renewable energy and energy efficiency In addition,Minn. Stat. § 469.190 should programs. Current statutes do not explicitly amended to allow cities to impose up to a provide city authority to include those types five percent local lodging tax and to allow of performance conditions in a franchise cities to modify the uses of their local agreement. lodging tax revenues to meet local needs. Cities should also have general authority Under current law, cities are permitted to to create utilities, similar to the storm engage citizens when discussing a new or sewer utility authority, in order to fund renewed franchise fee arrangement in the 159 manner that best fits the community. A Utility Valuation Transition Aid program. recent legislative proposal would have This program compensates host added a prescriptive notification and reverse communities that have lost more than 4 referendum requirement to the process of percent of their net tax capacity as a result of imposing or renewing a franchise agreement Department of Revenue's rule changes. with a gas or an electric utility. Currently the taxation of electric generation Response: Municipal authority to collect personal property represents the best method franchise fee revenues from utilities is an for reimbursing host communities for the important and equitable mechanism to cost of hosting IOUs. However, a 2015 MN offset the costs of maintaining public Department of Revenue study on electric right-of-way and to generate a return on generation taxation has generated proposals a publicly held asset. Municipal franchise to change the state system of taxing electric authority must be preserved and should generation which raise equal or greater be expanded to allow city policy priorities revenues for host cities. to be addressed through conditions in franchise agreements that have the cost Response: The League of Minnesota covered by local ratepayers,where Cities supports the continuation of the appropriate, and can be accomplished Utility Valuation Transition Aid program within the local franchise boundaries. The and opposes any efforts to change League opposes adding a one-size-fits-all statutory language or to divert promised notification requirement and a reverse funds away from host communities for referendum procedure to the gas and any purpose unless statutory language electric franchise fee process. In addition, replaces promised funds with equal or in situations where a local provider greater revenue to host communities. If decides to sell their operations, the city the Legislature does determine that it is must have the right of first refusal to necessary to re-allocate the funds in the purchase the assets of the utility. Utility Valuation Transition Aid program for another purpose, the League supports FF-22. Utility Valuation Transition other legislative efforts that would Aid compensate the host communities for the economic and environmental costs of Issue: In 2007, the Minnesota Department hosting these facilities through of Revenue revised its rules regarding the reimbursement from the investor-owned valuation of electric and natural gas utility utilities. These other efforts could property. This change in the rules resulted include, but are not limited to,increasing in valuation changes for utility property that the class rate on utility property to the dramatically reduced the amount of revenue extent that it would offset the negative that local governments will collect in effects of the utility valuation rule change. property tax from these utilities. FF-23. State Assistance for Recognizing that the communities that host Property Tax Refunds for State- these utilities bear extraordinary burdens Assessed Property connected with stress on local infrastructure, public safety, and public nuisance due to the Issue: State law requires certain property, presence of these facilities in their including pipelines, railroad,utility property communities, the Legislature created the 160 be assessed for property taxation purposes FF-25. Payments for Services to by the Minnesota Department of Revenue. Tax-Exempt Property When companies challenge the valuation of these properties, local units of government Issue: Taxable property in many cities is may be required to refund excess taxes, being acquired by nonprofit and government which in some cases, can create financial entities. Converting the property to tax- hardship for local units of government and exempt status can lead to serious tax base their taxpayers. erosion without any corresponding reduction in the service needs created by the property. In 2021, the legislature appropriated $29.4 million from the state's general fund to In 2013, legislation was introduced that reimburse a pipeline company for the tax would have broadly exempted non-profit court judgment. However, this one-time property from paying user fees or service appropriation will not provide assistance to charges for any service funded in part with other recent tax court decisions. property taxes over the previous five years. Under certain circumstances, this proposal Response: The state should establish a could have potentially exempted non-profits permanent program to provide financial from paying for even utility charges. compensation to all units of local government for court ordered property Response: Cities should have the tax refunds where the state has authority to collect payments from determined values. statutorily-exempt property owners to cover costs of service similar to the FF-24. Transition for Property authority provided under the special Acquired by Tax-Exempt Entities assessment law. The League of Minnesota Cities opposes legislation that would Issue:When an existing taxable property is exempt non-profits from paying for user acquired by a tax-exempt entity other than a fees and service charges that help fund city or a city development authority or services these organizations use. otherwise becomes tax exempt and removed from the tax base, the taxes formerly paid by FF-26. Housing Improvement the property owner are shifted to other, Areas and Special Service Districts remaining taxable properties within the Petitioned by Business jurisdiction. When the acquired property is a large percentage of the tax base of a city or Issue: In 1996, cities were granted general other local unit of government, the shift in authority under Minn. Stat. §§ 428A.11-.21 taxes can be substantial. to use Housing Improvement Areas (HIAs) Response: The state should establish a in order to finance housing improvements program to provide financial for condominium and townhome complexes. compensation to all units of local Several cities around the state have used this government for court ordered property tool and found it to be a useful mechanism tax refunds where the state has for maintaining older association homes. determined values. The 2013 Legislature also granted HIA authority to a county Community Development Authority (CDA). As part of 161 that authority, the CDA is required to gather and SSDs. The League of Minnesota local approval before creating an HIA. Cities supports the authority for cities to work with their business communities to In 1996, the Legislature also gave cities the establish SSDs and opposes efforts to general authority to create Special Service restrict general authority of the tool. Districts (SSDs)under Minn. Stat. §§ 428A.01-.101. Cities around the state The League also supports the potential have used this tool to provide an increased use of SSDs for mixed-use districts that level of service to commercial or industrial include residential and areas, commonly in areas of retail commercial/industrial properties. The concentration. SSDs are established at the law should be reviewed to determine to request of local businesses, who ultimately what extent mixed-use properties can and pay for and benefit from the increased level should contribute to a Special Service of service. A SSD may be established District from which they will benefit. The anywhere in a city but only business League would support legislation that property (i.e. commercial, industrial,utility, expands SSDs to include mixed-use or land zoned for commercial or industrial development to the extent it balances the use)will be subject to the service charge. benefits and obligations of residential Some special services have included street properties within the district. and sidewalk cleaning, snow and ice removal, lighting, signage,parking, parking If the Legislature grants multi- enforcement, marketing and promotion, jurisdictional entities the authority to landscaping, and security. A SSD may be create HIAs, creation of an HIA must established only by petition and the city require local approval. adopts an ordinance to establish it. Minn. Stat. §§ 428A.09-10 establishes procedures FF-27. Tax-Forfeited Properties for the business owners in the SSD to veto and Local Special Assessments or end the SSD. The 2013 legislature extended the sunset for both tools for 15 Issue: Special assessments are a charge years, making it set to expire on June 30, authorized by the Legislature and state law, 2028. In 2017, the House considered imposed on properties for a particular legislation that was ultimately unsuccessful improvement that benefits those selected to repeal the general SSD authority for properties. Cities follow complex, time- cities. There are currently over 15 cities that consuming statutory special assessment have established SSDs around the state. procedures to specially assess the appropriate amount of the local As cities work to develop and/or redevelop infrastructure improvements to those commercial, industrial, and residential areas, properties. new ways of paying for and providing increased levels of service should be If a property with validly attached special available to local entities. Use of Special assessments goes into tax-forfeiture, the Service Districts in mixed-use development county auditor cancels all of the local is one tool that could be available for this special assessments due and remaining purpose. unpaid on each parcel, which is authorized in Minn. Stat. § 282.07. Therefore, the city Response: The Legislature should give loses the funds previously budgeted and cities permanent authority to create HIAs planned for to pay for the local 162 improvements. To underline this point, the special assessment, and city taxpayers may funds have already been expended and if not be forced to absorb the sunk costs of a collected, result in losses to the city. project in order to sell the property. When tax-forfeited land returns to private State statutes governing the apportionment ownership, and the parcel benefitted from an of the proceeds from the sale of tax forfeit improvement for which the city canceled property allow counties to first recover special assessments because of the administrative costs related to the tax forfeiture, the city may assess or reassess the forfeiture process before subsequent parcel. But cities must go through the same allocations are made for special assessments cumbersome notice and hearing procedures and hazardous waste cleanup associated in order to re-attach the assessments. with the property. State law is unclear whether the proceeds from a tax forfeiture Response: The Legislature should remove transaction should be used to reimburse the cancellation of local special assessments county only for the expenses associated with from state law, allowing cities to receive the transacted parcel, or if the proceeds can the funding validly assessed and counted be used to reimburse the county for on to fund local infrastructure administrative costs associated with other improvements. parcels that were not transacted. When the latter allocation method is employed by a FF-28. Distribution of Proceeds county, the transaction proceeds can be from the Sale of Tax-Forfeit disproportionately applied to county Property administrative costs resulting in a lower allocation of remaining proceeds to cover Issue: When properties go into tax forfeiture existing special assessments, hazardous all levels of government lose tax revenue waste cleanup costs and ultimately the final that would otherwise support the services allocation of residual tax forfeit sale they provide. It is always in the best interest proceeds to cities. of taxpayers to return these properties to the tax rolls as quickly as possible. In addition, counties are allowed to use 30 percent of the amount remaining after the Although the tax forfeiture process is deduction for administrative expenses and controlled by the county, and counties have the repayment of special assessments for a legitimate need to be reimbursed for forest development projects and then 20 reasonable administrative costs, the city percent of any remaining proceeds for often has more at stake financially in terms county parks and recreation projects. The of costs fronted to facilitate development structure of the distribution of the proceeds (e.g., assessments for public infrastructure frequently results in cities receiving a very and unpaid development or utility fees). small percentage of the initial forfeit sale While the tax forfeit procedure provides a proceeds. As a result, cities may not recoup process for the repayment of special even a portion of the unpaid taxes or special assessments, it does not require the assessments owed on a property. repayment of unpaid utility charges or unpaid building and development fees. In most cases, cities and counties work Further, due to large assessments that some collaboratively to ensure that properties are cities are left with, it may not be practical to returned to the tax rolls quickly to benefit all sell a tax-forfeited property subject to a taxpayers. However, when consensus is not 163 reached, the tax forfeiture statutes place separate statutory apportionments while cities at a disadvantage and can allowing counties to use their designated disproportionately burden the taxpayers of 40 percent share of the remaining the city in which the properties are located. proceeds for these uses. Response: The League of Minnesota FF-29. State Hazard Mitigation and Cities believes the tax forfeiture statutes Response Support should be reviewed and amended as necessary to ensure that the needs of city Issue: Cities in Minnesota are exposed to and county taxpayers are properly extreme weather events such as winds, balanced. Specifically, the League flooding, fires, and drought and are facing supports changes in the distribution of the severe financial consequences of the the proceeds from the sale of tax forfeit clean-up, repairs, and community social and property contained in Minn. Stat. § economic recovery, even though damages 282.08 to elevate the priority for may be deemed"not of such severity and repayment of unpaid charges for magnitude" as to qualify for federal electricity, water and sewer charges assistance. certified pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 444.075 subd. 3(e), and any unpaid fees Response: The League of Minnesota prescribed pursuant to Minn. Stat. § Cities calls on our legislators and state 462.353 subd. 4(a), to require those executive agencies charged with hazard unpaid charges and fees to be repaid mitigation planning to address not only a immediately after unpaid special response to extreme weather events but to assessments. also put into place a proactive strategy to minimize or mitigate the financial The proceeds from the sale of a tax consequences. At a minimum, this effort forfeited parcel should be used to pay the should offer a reasonable loan funding assessments and administrative and program that is easily accessible by cities, development costs for the transacted businesses and homeowners to financially parcel. Minn. Stat. § 282.09 should be recover and rebuild, with the ultimate amended to prevent the proceeds from goal of preserving jobs,industries, and the sales of a tax forfeited parcel to be communities. used to pay excessive administrative costs or the costs for other parcels in the county The state response should allow for the until the city is fairly reimbursed for use of new technology and best unpaid assessments and development management practices for any costs of the transacted parcel. reconstruction of infrastructure to lessen the impact of future disasters and to Before the final distribution of any mitigate the effects of disasters resulting remaining proceeds from the sale of tax from future extreme weather events. forfeited land are distributed to cities, counties, and school districts, Minn. Stat. FF-30. Library Funding § 282.08(4)(i) and (ii) give counties the right to take up to half of those proceeds Issue: State law requires that local for county forest development and county governments maintain a minimum level of park and recreation areas. The League funding for public library services. This is also supports the elimination of these collectively known as "state-certified levels 164 of library support,"or more commonly county library system belong to MELSA as known as, "maintenance of effort(MOE)" affiliates of their county library system. The and is described in Minn. Stat. § 134.34. funding of libraries in MELSA may be from a county levy, a city levy, a city library fund A majority of public libraries in Minnesota from the general city levy or a combination. belong a regional library system, which is the entity that receives library funding from Most libraries not only serve city residents, the Minnesota Department of Education. Six but also serve people that reside outside of of the 12 regional library systems are city limits who, in some cases, are not fully structured as a federated system where the contributing to the upkeep, maintenance or individual libraries or library systems operations of the library through property operate autonomously from the regional tax levies. While counties do contribute to library system but they can utilize certain municipal libraries, this support falls well services such as inter-library loan short of the per capita amounts contributed distribution, digital card cataloging, which by city residents. capitalize on economies of effort from partnering with the other libraries in the City officials support libraries and believe regional system. The MOE for any city that that a system of equitably funded libraries is taxes separately for library services is now needed. One approach that has been set at 90% of the amount established in 2011 previously approved by the Legislature is (see Minn. Stat. § 275.761). In 2011, it was providing for funding through regional tax calculated using a formula that included levies designated as "library districts."A payments made in the form of the library district would have the authority to levy for employee salaries, payments toward public library services in lieu of their operating the facility, purchasing materials member cities and counties. Under Minn. from the library, and other operating costs, Stat. § 134.201, the Great River Regional adjusted net tax capacity, and several other Library System and the East Central factors. The other half of the state's public Regional Library System already have library systems are consolidated systems, authority to create "library districts." where the regional library system runs the libraries through a joint powers agreement Some cities also contribute a supplemental with counties and participating cities. The amount of funding separate from MOE regional library system has a board and hires requirements, usually to pay for building the director. A city that participates in the maintenance costs. When the state calculates regional system will have an MOE the required MOE for each local unit of (calculated as described above). The city government, local building costs are MOE may include dollars provided directly included in city MOE requirements and all to the regional library system or operating monies cities contribute to a library dollars provided to support building costs building, except capital, are taken into (i.e. city-provided maintenance services). account. The MOE requirement is a mandate on cities that does not allow for local In the metropolitan area, the seven county decision making. However, it provides a library systems and one city library system stable source of funding to protect the belong to the Metropolitan Library Services investment in library resources and services Agency (MELSA), the metro area regional around the state. There are some groups that library system. Most of the cities that are advocating for a restoration of the MOE operate libraries independently from their to levels at least as high as the 2010 level. 165 Response: The League of Minnesota authority for municipal libraries to Cities supports sufficient, stable and charge non-residents for membership equitable funding for local libraries to and/or other services without the loss of allow for local budget decision making. any State or Federal aids. The League urges the state legislature to increase funding for Regional Library FF-31. Park and Library Land Tax Basic System Support in order to amend Break the distribution of these funds to provide more stability and equity to each of the 12 Issue:As the price for land increases, it is regional public library systems. becoming more difficult for cities and other Specifically, the LMC supports: local units of government to compete with developers to save and secure land and a) Amending the distribution formula to easements that are deemed appropriate for increase the Basic System Services park, library, trail, and green spaces. factor from 5% to 15% and reduce the Equalization factor from 25% to Response: The state should amend the tax 15%; laws to provide tax incentives for property owners who sell land and b) Increasing the total appropriation easements to local units of government from the current$13.57M/year to an when the land is to be used for park, amount necessary to hold all 12 library,trail or green space purposes. regional systems harmless through the formula change. FF-32. Increasing Safe School Levy The League supports changes to the Authority library maintenance of effort by the Issue: Strong partnerships between schools Legislature as follows: and local law enforcement are critical to a) The required annual payment should school safety. Police School Resource reflect the amount the city itself pays Officers (SROs) are valued professionals in toward maintenance, upkeep, and school communities and provide support, capital improvements to the library in safety and security for students, staff and the that year. public. Further, SROs can provide regular opportunities for informal, positive b) If the MOE reduction in Minn. Stat. § interactions between students and police 275.761 is restored to a level at least as personnel. high as the 2010 level,it should be Under Minn. Stat. § 126C.44, the Safe phased in over three years. Schools Levy allows school districts to levy c) Any relief provided to the county for costs associated with student and staff MOE requirement should not result in safety based on student enrollment numbers. additional funding requirements to Some eligible expenses include police cities. liaison services; drug abuse prevention programs; gang resistance education The League also supports the creation of training; school security; crime prevention; general authority for library systems to and implementation of student and staff create library taxing districts and the safety measures. 166 Using Safe Schools Levy authority, local districts would provide a steady source of school boards may raise additional resources revenue,which would be assessed against for school safety and security. Almost every all properties in the school district, not Minnesota school district currently levies just against properties in the city. the full amount of$36 per pupil. This amount does not cover the full cost of FF-34. Street Reconstruction Bond providing this important service, and local Approval law enforcement agencies are not being fully compensated for providing SROs. Issue:Under Minnesota law, financing the maintenance of streets can be a challenge for Response: The League supports city councils. Minn. Stat. § 475.58 subd. 3b, increasing the maximum Safe Schools authorizes a city council, by two-thirds vote, Levy from $36 per pupil up to $60 per to approve the issuance of bonds to finance pupil to ensure schools and communities street reconstruction or bituminous overlays are able to continue providing safe without voter approval. The two-thirds schools programming. council approval requirement is further subject to a reverse referendum process FF-33. Equitable Funding of whereby a number equal to five percent of Community Education Services those voting in the last municipal general election can petition for a referendum to Issue:Under Minn. Stat. § 124D.20, school approve the issuance of the bonds. districts are authorized to levy for community education programs that can Response: Street maintenance is one of include youth recreational activities. the essential functions of cities in However, state statute limits the total Minnesota. The laws governing issuance amount of revenue that can be raised by the of bonds to maintain streets should be school district to fund community education amended to allow the approval of the programs and this limit has not been bonds by a simple majority of the council. sufficiently increased in recent years. In The existing reverse referendum process many instances, cities participate in the assures that taxpayers could trigger a funding of these programs and with the referendum on the issuance of bonds if statutory limit on the amount school districts they can meet the five percent petition can levy, the increased cost of these threshold. programs is increasingly falling on cities and their property taxpayers. In areas where the FF-35. Special Assessment Election school district is significantly larger than the Requirements city, the burden of funding these programs is falling disproportionately on city taxpayers Issue: City Councils are best situated to while the programs benefit the entire school recognize the need to replace infrastructure district. and when to schedule the replacement projects. Cities are often only able to carry Response: The League of Minnesota out these and other vital improvements by Cities supports a statutory increase in the issuing bonds and assessing some amount of community education revenue the cost to property owners. authorization for school districts. Increasing the amount of the community Issuing bonds to finance most local service revenue available to school improvement projects requires a special 167 election unless the city can legally collect at exclusion for many homeowners. According least 20% of the project costs through to the Minnesota Association of Realtors, in special assessments. As a legal limit, cities 2011, the median sales price of homes in cannot collect special assessments from any Minnesota, was $135,000, which received property greater than the increase in fair an exclusion of$25,090 or nearly 19 percent market value bestowed to that property by of the total value of the home. In 2021, the the improvement (the "special benefit test"). median sales price was $306,750, which On occasion, the increase in property values received an exclusion of$9,633, or just 3.1 as a result of the improvement can fail to percent of the total value of the home. add up to the 20%threshold necessary to finance projects without requiring a special During the 2022 legislative session, election. legislators considered proposals to increase the homestead market value exclusion. The Response: In order to facilitate the House would have increased the exclusion financing of public infrastructure to 40 percent of the value on the first projects, the threshold for requiring voter $80,300 of value and extended the full approval for issuance of improvement phase-out to homes valued at up to bonds under Minn. Stat. 429.091 should $437,100. The Senate would have increased be reduced to 15 percent. This change the exclusion to 40 percent of the value on would provide more flexibility for cities the first $95,000 of value and extended the with their full phase-out to homes valued at up to construction/bonding/assessment $517,200. decisions and may be more likely to survive a challenge while still providing Response: Due to the recent rapid value to the property owner. increase in home values,the League of Minnesota Cities supports modifications FF-36. Homestead Market Value to the homestead market value exclusion Exclusion program to increase the benefit of the exclusion to qualifying homeowners. Issue: In 2011, the legislature repealed the Changes to the homestead market value existing homestead market value credit exclusion should be considered in concert program and replaced it with a new with the impact of the homestead credit Homestead Market Value exclusion(Minn. refund program Stat. § 273.13, subd. 35). Under the homestead market value exclusion, an FF-37. State Fund for Non-weather- amount equal to 40 percent of the assessor's related Disaster/Catastrophe Relief estimate of the home's market value for a home up to $76,000 in market value is Issue: Municipalities and other excluded from taxation. For homes in excess governmental units are at risk of of$76,000 of market value, the exclusion experiencing disastrous events affecting phases out as home values increase until it is their communities beyond natural disasters, totally phased out for homes over$413,800. whether from civil disturbances, industrial The general parameters of the program have catastrophes, or other disastrous events. not changed since 2011. Such events may result in unbudgeted and unfunded costs related to clean-up, repairs, Recent trends in residential home values "social" and economic recovery, have significantly reduced the value of the infrastructure restoration, rebuilding 168 structures, and other damage repair which Response: The League of Minnesota may not be qualify for relief from Federal Cities supports the creation of a state resources. While some limited State fund to assist local communities in repair resources may be available, cities do not and response to these disastrous events have the resources to respond to such with the ultimate goal of preserving jobs, disasters. industries, and communities. 169 L0 LEAGUE MC MINNESOTA CITIES League of Minnesota Cities 145 University Avenue West St. Paul, MN 55103-2044 TEL: (651) 281-1200 (800) 925-1122 FAX: (651) 281-1299 WEB: www.lmc.org 160 METRO CITIES Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Legislative Policies January 2023 Metro Cities Association of Metropolitan Municipalities 145 University Ave. W. St. Paul, Minnesota, 55103-2044 Phone: (651) 215-4000 Website: www.MetroCitiesMN.org Fax: (651) 281-1299 Twitter: @MetroCitiesMN Ms.Patricia Nauman Mr. Charlie Vander Aarde Mr.Michael Lund Ms.Jennifer Dorn Executive Director Gov't Relations Specialist Gov't Relations Specialist Office Manager (651)215-4002 (651)215-4001 (651)215-4003 (651)215-4004 Patricia@MetroCitiesMN.org Charlie@MetroCitiesMN.org Michael@MetroCitesMN.org Jennifer@MetroCitiesMN.org Table of Contents Municipal Revenue & Taxation 1 1-A State and Local Fiscal Relationship 1-B COVID-19 Pandemic Assistance 2 1-C Revenue Diversification and Access 2 1-D Restrictions on Local Government Budgets 3 1-E Budget and Financial Reporting Requirements 3 1-F Local Government Aid(LGA) 3 1-G State Property Tax Relief Programs 4 1-H Property Valuation Limits/Limited Market Value 4 1-I Market Value Homestead Exclusion Program(MVHE) 5 1-J Metropolitan Area Fiscal Disparities Program 5 1-K Constitutional Tax and Expenditure Limits 6 1-L State Property Tax 6 1-M Class Rate Tax System 6 1-N Regional Facility Host Communities 6 1-0 Sales Tax on Local Government Purchases 7 1-P City Revenue Stability and Fund Balance 7 1-Q Public Employees' Retirement Association(PERA) 7 1-R State Program Revenue Sources 8 1-S Post-Employment Benefits 8 1-T Health Care Insurance Programs 9 1-U State Budget Stability 9 1-V Taxation of Electronic Commerce 9 1-W Payments for Services to Tax Exempt Property 9 1-X Proceeds from Tax Forfeited Property 9 1-Y Vehicle Title and Registration System (VTRS) 10 1-Z Special Assessments l0 General Government 11 2-A Mandates, Zoning & Local Authority 11 2-B City Enterprise Activities 11 2-C Firearms on City Property 11 2-D 911 Telephone Tax 12 2-E 800 MHz Radio System 12 2-F Building Codes 12 2-G Administrative Fines 13 2-H Residential Programs 14 2-I Annexation 14 2-J Statewide Funding Sources for Local Issues with Regional Impact 15 2-K Urban Forest Management Funding 15 2023 Legislative Policies Table of Contents 2-L Pollinator Habitat Resources 15 2-M Regulation of Harmful Substances and Products 16 2-N Private Well Drilling Restriction Authority 16 2-0 Organized Waste Collection 16 2-P Election Administration 17 2-Q Utility Franchise Fees, Accountability and Cost Transparency 17 2-R Water Supply 18 2-S Regulation of Massage Therapists 19 2-T Peace Officer Arbitration Reform 19 2-U Public Safety Training and Resources 19 2-V Race Equity 20 2-W Street Racing 20 2-X Carjacking 21 2-Y Catalytic Converter Theft 21 Housing & Economic Development 23 Policies 3-A to 3-J: Introduction 23 3-A City Role in Housing 23 3-B City Role in Affordable and Life Cycle Housing 24 3-C Inclusionary Housing 25 3-D Metropolitan Council Role in Housing 26 3-E Allocation of Affordable Housing Need 27 3-F Housing Policy &Production Survey 28 3-G State Role in Housing 28 3-H Federal Role in Affordable and Workforce Housing 30 3-I Vacant, Boarded, and Foreclosed Properties and Properties at Risk 32 3-J Housing Ordinance Enforcement 33 3-K Economic Development, Redevelopment and Workforce Readiness 33 3-K (1) Economic Development 34 3-K (2) Redevelopment 35 3-K (3)Workforce Readiness 36 3-L Tax Increment Financing (TIF) 36 3-M Eminent Domain 38 3-N Community Reinvestment 39 3-0 Business Incentives Policy 40 3-P Broadband Technology 40 3-Q City Role in Environmental Protection and Sustainable Development 41 3-R Impaired Waters 42 2023 Legislative Policies Table of Contents Metropolitan Agencies 43 4-A Goals and Principles for Regional Governance 43 4-B Regional Governance Structure 43 4-C Comprehensive Analysis and Oversight of Metropolitan Council 44 4-D Funding Regional Services 45 4-E Regional Systems 45 4-F Regional Water Supply Planning 45 4-G Review of Local Comprehensive Plans 46 4-H Comprehensive Planning Process 47 4-I Comprehensive Planning Schedule 47 4-J Local Zoning Authority 48 4-K Regional Growth 48 4-L Natural Resource Protection 49 4-M Inflow and Infiltration (I/I) 50 4-N Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) 51 4-0 Funding Regional Parks & Open Space 52 4-P Livable Communities 52 4-Q Density 53 Transportation 54 Transportation Policies and Funding Introduction 54 5-A Road and Bridge Funding 54 5-B Regional Transit System 55 5-C Transit Financing 57 5-D Street Improvement Districts 57 5-E Highway and Bridge Turn Backs &Funding 58 5-F "3C" Transportation Planning Process: Elected Officials' Role 58 5-G Electronic Imaging for Enforcement of Traffic Laws 58 5-H Transportation Network Companies and Alternative Transportation Modes 58 5-I Airport Noise Mitigation 59 5-J Funding for Non-Municipal State Aid(MSAS) City Streets 59 5-K County State Aid Highway (CSAH) Distribution Formula 60 5-L Municipal Input/Consent for Trunk Highways and County Roads 60 5-M Plat Authority 61 5-N MnDOT Maintenance Budget 61 5-0 Transit Taxing District 61 5-P Complete Streets 61 2023 Legislative Policies Table of Contents Committee Rosters 63 Municipal Revenue & Taxation 63 Housing & Economic Development 64 Metropolitan Agencies 65 Transportation& General Government 66 2023 Legislative Policies Municipal Revenue & Taxation 1-A State and Local Fiscal Relationship A functional state and local fiscal relationship must emphasize adequacy, equitability, sustainability and accountability for public resources and communication among the state,cities, and public.An effective partnership must also emphasize practices that strengthen collaboration and partnership between the state and local units of government. Services provided by cities are traditionally funded through a combination of property taxes, fees, and state aids. Increasingly, cities are bearing more costs for services that have historically been the responsibility of the state. Metro Cities supports a state and local fiscal partnership that emphasizes the following: • Strong financial stewardship and accountability for public resources that emphasizes efficiencies in service delivery and effective communication among the state, local units of government, and the public. • Reliable and adequate revenue sources including the property tax and local government aids, and dedicated funds to meet specific local needs. Metro Cities opposes diverting dedicated funds or local aids to balance state budgets. • Sufficient revenue sources available to cities that allow cities to address local needs and citizens to receive adequate services at relatively similar levels of taxation, and that maintain local, regional, and state economic vitality and competitiveness. • Full state funding to cover mandates enacted by the state,and flexibility for local governments in implementing state mandates to ensure local costs are minimized. • Local decision-making authority regarding the terms and conditions of employment for local government employees,including compensation,recognition, and benefits. • Adequate and timely notification regarding new legislative programs or modifications to existing programs or policies to allow cities time to plan for implementation and manage any effects on local budgeting processes. • Support for cooperative purchasing arrangements between the state and local units of government. Such arrangements must be structured to be able to address unexpected delays or other challenges in the procurement of goods,so that any disruptions to local government operations and services that may result from such delays are minimized. State officials should seek local feedback in the vetting of product vendors. • The concept of performance measuring, but opposition to using state established measurements to determine the allocation of state aids to local governments or restrict the ability of local governments in establishing local budgets and levies. 2023 Legislative Policies 1 Municipal Revenue & Taxation 1-B COVID-19 Pandemic Assistance Metro Cities supported the distribution of federal funds distributed under the Coronavirus Relief Fund and State and American Rescue Plan Act Local Fiscal Recovery Fund, to assist cities in addressing service needs and expenses related to the COVID-19 pandemic, including certain personnel costs as well as local service and operational improvements and modifications required to ensure public health and safety. Metro Cities will continue to support federal and state funding to assist cities in addressing local needs and costs related to the pandemic. Metro Cities is monitoring federal rules and requirements for funds, and supports clarity in the guidance on the uses of funds and flexibility in eligible uses that allows local officials to address varied needs and challenges resulting from the pandemic. Metro Cities supports state financial assistance to address the long-term financial effects of the pandemic on local government budgets and revenues, and changes to state laws to allow cities temporary flexibility in the use of unobligated tax increment financing(TIF) increment and unobligated local sales and lodging tax revenues,to address local financial challenges resulting from the pandemic. Metro Cities supported 2021 statutory changes that allow unobligated increment to be used to assist businesses. 1-C Revenue Diversification and Access Metro Cities supports a balanced and diversified revenue system that acknowledges diverse city characteristics, needs and capacities and allows for greater stability in revenues. Metro Cities continues to support the ability of a city to impose a local option sales tax for public improvements and capital replacement costs using local processes specified by law but without the need for special legislation. Metro Cities supports changes to state laws governing local taxes to include the following: • A statutory clarification to allow a referendum to occur at any November election or special election. • A clarification of laws governing separate ballot questions for each proposed local project, or allowing a city to combine projects into a single question, to avoid voter confusion. • A repeal of the prohibition on imposing a local sales tax for one year from the expiration of an existing local sales tax. • Changes to laws on the local sales tax process to allow a city flexibility to modify a ballot question to increase the amount of the collected tax and extend the duration of tax to cover unanticipated cost increases. The Legislature should recognize equity considerations involved with local sales taxes and continue to provide aids to cities that have high needs,overburdens and/or low fiscal capacity. 2023 Legislative Policies 2 Municipal Revenue & Taxation Metro Cities supports a modification to laws governing local lodging taxes to allow cities to impose up to a five percent lodging tax, and the ability of cities to modify the uses of revenues to meet local needs. Metro Cities supports current laws providing for municipal franchise fee authority and opposes statutory changes such as reverse referendum requirements or other constraints that would reduce local authority and flexibility for establishing, amending, or renewing franchise fees and interfere with local public processes and goals for establishing such fees. 1-D Restrictions on Local Government Budgets Metro Cities strongly opposes levy limits, reverse referenda, super majority requirements for levy and valuation freezes,or other restrictions on local government budgeting and taxing processes. Such restrictions undermine local budgeting and taxing processes, planned growth, and the relationship between locally elected officials and their residents by allowing the state to decide the appropriate level of local taxation and services, despite varying local conditions and circumstances. 1-E Budget and Financial Reporting Requirements State laws require cities to prepare and submit or publish numerous budget and financial reports. These requirements often create significant costs to cities, and some requirements result in duplication.Additional reporting requirements should have a clearly defined statement of public purpose and need not be covered under existing requirements and should balance the need for additional information with the costs of compiling and submitting the information. Considering the numerous existing reporting requirements,Metro Cities supports reducing the number of mandated reports. Metro Cities supports efforts to consolidate municipal government financial reporting requirements in the Office of the State Auditor,including an electronic submission alternative to any remaining paper filing requirements, and to authorize the use of web publication where newspaper publication is currently required. While Metro Cities recognizes that enacted statutory requirements to the local truth-in-taxation process enacted in 2022 are intended to enhance citizen involvement in budget processes,the new requirements are significant and will be administratively challenging to produce and disseminate. Existing requirements are expansive and were designed to maximize citizen engagement in budgeting processes. Metro Cities will continue to monitor the new law and its effects on local government processes and budgets. 1-F Local Government Aid (LGA) The state's prosperity and vitality depend significantly upon the economic strength of the metropolitan region,and cities within the region play critical roles in fostering the economic development,job creation and business expansion that underpin the state's economic health. Metro Cities supports the city Local Government Aid (LGA) program as a means of ensuring cities remain affordable places to live and work while meeting the public service needs of residents and businesses. 2023 Legislative Policies 3 Municipal Revenue & Taxation Metro Cities supports updates to the LGA formula factors and an increase in the program appropriation consistent with recommendations by a work group of city associations. Recommended updates will ensure the LGA program adequately reflects and addresses city needs. To ensure appropriation levels are adequate to meet program objectives, Metro Cities supports increasing the LGA appropriation to address cities' unmet need as defined by the LGA formula as well as increases in the LGA appropriation to account for inflation. By way of reference, the total need identified in the LGA formula for 2023 is estimated at $767.9 million,whereas the current funding is set at$564.3 million,putting the remaining need at $203.5 million. Metro Cities supports formula-based allocations for increases to the LGA appropriation, and opposes freezes of the LGA appropriation,reductions of LGA for balancing state budget deficits,and diversions of the LGA appropriation to other purposes or entities. Metro Cities also opposes artificial limits or reductions that single out specific cities,and further opposes using LGA as financial leverage to influence activities and policy decisions at the local level. 1-G State Property Tax Relief Programs Metro Cities supports state funded property tax relief programs paid directly to homestead property taxpayers such as the "circuit breaker" program and enhanced targeting for special circumstances.Metro Cities also supports the renter's credit program.Metro Cities supports an analysis of property tax relief programs to determine their effectiveness and equity in providing property tax relief to individuals and families across the state. Metro Cities supports efforts by the Minnesota Department of Revenue to expand outreach and notification efforts about state property tax relief programs to homeowners, and notifications to local units of government to support such efforts.Metro Cities also supports legislative modifications to make tax relief payments to taxpayers automatic. Metro Cities supports the use of the Department of Revenue's Voss database to link income and property values, and the consideration of income relative to property taxes paid in determining eligibility for state property tax relief programs.Updates to the database should occur in a timely manner, with data reviewed periodically to ensure the database's accuracy and usefulness. 1-H Property Valuation Limits/Limited Market Value Metro Cities opposes the use of artificial limits in valuing property at market for taxation purposes since such limitations shift tax burdens to other classes of property and create disparities between properties of equal value. 2023 Legislative Policies 4 Municipal Revenue & Taxation 1a Market Value Homestead Exclusion Program The Market Value Homestead Exclusion Program (MVHE)provides property tax relief to qualifying homesteads,through reductions in property tax values,which shifts property taxes within jurisdictions.The MVHE replaced a former Market Value Homestead Credit Program, which provided credits on local government tax bills to qualifying properties, with reimbursements provided by the state to local governments. Metro Cities opposes restoration of the former Market Value Homestead Credit, as reimbursements to local governments were inconsistent,and encourages further study of the exclusion program,with input by city officials, to determine the program's overall efficacy and its effects on local tax bases.Due to the recent rapid increase in home values, Metro Cities supports modifications to the homestead market value exclusion program to increase the benefit of the exclusion to qualifying homeowners. Changes to the homestead market value exclusion should be considered in concert with the impact of the homestead credit refund program. 1-J Metropolitan Area Fiscal Disparities Program The Metropolitan Area Fiscal Disparities Program,enacted in 1971,was created for the purposes of: • providing a way for local governments to share in the resources generated by the growth of the metropolitan area without removing existing resources; • promoting orderly development of the region by reducing the impact of fiscal considerations on the location of business and infrastructure; • establishing incentives for all parts of the area to work for the growth of the area as a whole; • helping communities at various stages of development; and • encouraging protection of the environment by reducing the impact of fiscal considerations to ensure protection of parks, open space and wetlands. Metro Cities supports the Fiscal Disparities Program.Metro Cities opposes any diversion from the fiscal disparities pool to fund specific state, regional or local programs,goals or projects as such diversions contradict the purposes of the program. Legislation that would modify or impact the fiscal disparities program should only be considered within a framework of comprehensive reform efforts of the state's property tax, aids, and credits system. Any proposed legislation that would modify or impact the fiscal disparities program must be evaluated utilizing the criteria of fairness, equity, stability, transparency, and coherence in the treatment of cities and taxpayers across the metropolitan region and must continue to serve the program's intended purposes. 2023 Legislative Policies 5 Municipal Revenue & Taxation Metro Cities opposes legislation that would allow for capturing and pooling growth in residential tax capacity to fund specific programs or objectives. Further studies or task forces to consider modifications to the fiscal disparities program must include participation and input from metropolitan local government representatives. 1-K Constitutional Tax and Expenditure Limits Metro Cities strongly opposes including tax and expenditure limits in the state constitution, as it limits flexibility by the Legislature or local governments to respond to unanticipated critical needs, emergencies, or fluctuating economic situations. When services such as education,public safety and health care require increased funding beyond the overall limit, other publicly funded services potentially stand to receive inadequate resources. Constitutional limits result in reduced revenue bases during times of economic downturn and the inability to recover to previous service levels when economic prosperity returns. 1-L State Property Tax The state levies a property tax on commercial/industrial and cabin property. Since cities' only source of general funds is the property tax,Metro Cities opposes extension of the state property tax to additional classes of property. Metro Cities opposes using the state property tax to fund specific programs or objectives generally funded through state income and sales tax revenue. To increase transparency, Metro Cities supports efforts to have the state provide information on the property tax statement regarding the state property tax.Metro Cities opposes exempting specific classes of property under the tax as such exemptions shift the costs of the tax onto other classes of property. 1-M Class Rate Tax System Metro Cities opposes elimination of the class rate tax system or applying future levy increases to market value since this further complicates the property tax system. 1-N Regional Facility Host Communities Municipalities hosting regional facilities such as utilities, landfills or aggregate mining incur costs and effects such as environmental damage or lost economic development opportunities. Communities should be compensated for the effects of facilities that provide benefits to the region and state. Metro Cities supports efforts to offset the negative effects of these facilities and activities on host communities.Metro Cities would prefer that municipalities be allowed to collect a host fee that may be adjusted when state decisions affect those fees. 2023 Legislative Policies 6 Municipal Revenue & Taxation 1-0 Sales Tax on Local Government Purchases Metro Cities supported the 2013 reinstatement of the sales tax exemption for purchases of goods and services made by cities. This reinstatement does not apply to all local government purchases. To ensure citizens receive the full benefit of this exemption,the law should treat purchases of all local government units the same, including purchases made by special taxing districts,joint powers entities, or any other agency or instrumentality of local government. Metro Cities supports simplifying the process on the exemption for construction materials that is complex and cost ineffective or converting the process to a refund program. Metro Cities supported the law enacted in 2021 that exempts construction materials purchased to construct public safety facilities from state sales tax. Metro Cities supports granting an extension of the motor vehicle sales tax exemption to all municipal vehicles that are used for general city functions and are provided by governmental entities. Currently, only certain vehicles, including road maintenance vehicles purchased by townships, and municipal fire trucks and police vehicles not registered for use on public roads, are exempt from the MVST. 1-P City Revenue Stability and Fund Balance Metro Cities opposes state attempts to control or restrict city fund balances, or to use city fund balances as a rationale for reducing state aids or property tax payment delays. These funds are necessary to maintain fiscal viability, meet unexpected or emergency resource needs, purchase capital goods and infrastructure, provide adequate cash flow and maintain high level bond ratings. 1-Q Public Employees' Retirement Association (PERA) Metro Cities supports employees and cities sharing equally in the cost of necessary contribution increases and a sixty percent employer/forty percent employee split for the PERA Police and Fire Plan.Metro Cities also supports state assistance to local governments to cover contribution burdens placed on cities over and above contribution increases required by employees. Cities should receive sufficient notice of increases so that they may take them into account for budgeting purposes. Metro Cities opposes benefit improvements for active employees or retirees until the financial health of the PERA General Plan and PERA Police and Fire Plan are restored. Metro Cities supports modifications to help align PERA contributions and costs, and reduce the need for additional contribution increases,including a modification of PERA eligibility guidelines to account for temporary, seasonal, and part-time employment situations,the use of pro-rated service credit and a comprehensive review of exclusions to simplify eligibility guidelines.Further employer contribution rate increases should be avoided until other cost alignment mechanisms are considered. Metro Cities supports cities and fire relief associations working together to determine the 2023 Legislative Policies 7 Municipal Revenue & Taxation best application of State Fire Aid.Flexibility in the application of aid,where combination departments exist,will ensure that fire services can be provided in the most cost- effective means possible. Regarding police pension contributions, Metro Cities supports a proactive review of factors contributing to the financial status of police and fire pension plans,to ensure that structural adjustments are considered in conjunction with potential increases in employee and employer contribution rates. Specifically,an area that could be considered is contractual overtime impacts on pension levels. In recent years,the number of public safety employees seeking duty disability determinations through the Public Employees Retirement Association(PERA)and making workers' compensation claims for line-of-duty injuries has accelerated.The current system for processing and addressing duty disability benefits can be incompatible with the goal of restoring good health and returning employees to work and the fiscal implications of the increasing number of claims are unsustainable for employers and, ultimately, taxpayers. Metro Cities supports efforts by the League of Minnesota Cities and cities to invest resources into mental and physical injury, education, prevention, and treatment, and to gather empirical evidence related to the treatability of mental health injuries and provide early treatment. Metro Cities further supports full state funding for the Public Safety Officer Benefit account that reimbursees employers for continued health insurance to police officers and firefighters injured in the line of duty, funding to reimburse local governments for providing paid time off to public safety employees who experience work related trauma and/or are seeking treatment for a mental injury,and funding for trauma training, early intervention, and mental health treatment. Metro Cities supports removing the sunset of the PERA aid that is paid to local units of government to help address increased employer contribution costs. 1-R State Program Revenue Sources Metro Cities opposes any attempt by the state to finance programs of statewide value and significance,that are traditionally funded with state revenues,with local revenue sources such as municipal utilities or property tax mechanisms.Statewide programs serve important state goals and objectives and should be financed through traditional state revenue sources such as the income or sales tax. Metro Cities further opposes substituting traditionally state funded programs with funding mechanisms that would disparately affect taxpayers in the metropolitan area. 1-S Post-Employment Benefits Metro Cities supported statutory changes that allow local governments to establish trusts from which to fund post-employment health and life insurance benefits for public employees, with participation by cities on a strictly voluntary basis,in recognition of differing local needs and circumstances. Cities should retain the ability to determine the level of post-employment benefits to employees. 2023 Legislative Policies 8 Municipal Revenue & Taxation 1-T Health Care Insurance Programs Metro Cities supports legislative efforts to control health insurance costs but opposes actions that undermine local flexibility to manage rising insurance costs. Metro Cities encourages a full examination of the rising costs of health care and the impacts on city employers and employees. Metro Cities also supports a study of the fiscal impacts to both cities and retirees of pooling retirees separately from active employees. 1-U State Budget Stability Metro Cities strongly supports a state revenue system that provides for stability,flexibility, and adequacy in the system,reduces the volatility of state revenues and improves the long- term balance of state revenues and expenditures.Metro Cities supports a statutory budget reserve minimum that is adequate to manage risks and fluctuations in the state's tax system and a cash flow reserve account of sufficient size so that the state can avoid short- term borrowing to manage cash flow fluctuations. Metro Cities also supports an examination of the property tax system and the relationships between state and local tax bases, with an emphasis on state budget cuts and effects on property taxes. State budget deficits must be balanced with statewide sources and must not further reduce funding for property tax relief programs and aids to local governments that result in local governments bearing more responsibility for the costs of services that belong to the state. 1-V Taxation of Electronic Commerce Metro Cities supports efforts to develop a streamlined sales and use tax system to simplify sales and use tax collection and administration by retailers and states. Metro Cities supports policies that encourage remote retailers to collect and remit state sales taxes in states that are complying with the Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Agreement. Metro Cities opposes legislation that allows accommodation intermediaries such as online travel companies a tax exemption that terminates obligations to pay hotel taxes to state and local governments, or otherwise restricts legal actions by states and localities. The Legislature in 2011 clarified that these services are subject to state sales tax.Metro Cities supports statutory changes to further clarify that all lodging taxes, whether administered by the state or locally, apply to total charges, including charges for services provided by accommodation intermediaries. 1-W Payments for Services to Tax Exempt Property Metro Cities supports city authority to collect payments from tax exempt property owners to cover the costs of services to those entities, similar to statutory authority for special assessments. Metro Cities opposes legislation that would exempt nonprofit entities from paying user fees and service charges. 1-X Proceeds from Tax Forfeited Property Metro Cities supports changes to state laws governing the proceeds for tax forfeited properties. Currently, counties can recover administrative costs related to a property before other allocations are made, and the law allows for the county to recoup a percentage of 9 2023 Legislative Policies Municipal Revenue & Taxation assessment costs once administrative costs are allocated. The result is often no allocation or a very low allocation, and usually insufficient level of proceeds available for covering special assessments,unpaid taxes,and fees to cities. State processes addressing tax-forfeited properties can have implications for local land use plans and requirements and can result in unexpected and significant fiscal impacts on local communities. The current process also does not require the repayment of unpaid utility charges or building and development fees. Metro Cities supports statutory changes that balance repayment of unpaid taxes and assessments, utility charges and other fees and that more equitably allocates the distribution of proceeds between counties and cities. 1-Y Vehicle Title and Registration System (VTRS) Issues associated with the rollout of the state MN Licensing and Registration System (MNLARS)have caused significant unanticipated and ongoing disruptions to services provided by local deputy registrars. Some registrar offices have relied on other local revenues, such as the property tax, to manage normal expenses due to unresolved glitches in the system and a shift from the state to the local level for additional processing time. These challenges have also created a high potential for negative public perceptions on local government services,on an issue over which local governments have no ability to control. In 2019,state officials elected to replace the MNLARS system with the Vehicle Title and Registration System (VTRS). Metro Cities supports state funding to compensate local deputy registrars for unanticipated,increased costs associated with implementation of the new system, and the shifting of per-transaction processing burdens that may result from the implementation of VTRS. As the state works to identify efficiencies in the vehicle registration process and system,policy makers must consider the effects of changes on the financial viability of deputy registrars resulting from decreases in transaction fees collected by local registrars. Metro Cities supports increases to existing transaction fee levels that are set by state law,to ensure that local deputy registrars can sufficiently function and meet continually evolving local registrar service needs and address any necessary modifications to registrar operations to ensure these services can be provided safely to the public. 1-Z Special Assessments When property owners challenge special assessments based on application of the special benefit test,some courts have interpreted"benefits received"to mean the one-year increase in property value that is directly attributable to a construction project. There is currently no consistency between state laws and rulings by some courts on the term"benefits received". Metro Cities supports modifications to state laws governing special assessments for construction projects or other improvements arising from legislative authority to clarify the definition of "benefits received". The modified definition should more closely align with how special assessments are calculated and recognizes that the benefit of the improvement to a property may be realized over time and not within one year. 2023 Legislative Policies to General Government 2-A Mandates, Zoning & Local Authority To serve their local citizens and communities, city officials must have sufficient local control and decision-making authority. Metro Cities supports local decision-making authority and opposes statutory changes that erode local authority and decision making. Minn. Stat. §462.357,subd. 1,provide cities authority to regulate and set local ordinances for zoning. Metro Cities supports existing state laws that provide for this authority. Metro Cities supports statutory changes that give local officials greater authority to approve or deny variances to allow flexibility in responding to the needs of the community. Metro Cities also supports the removal of statutory barriers to uniform zoning ordinance amendment processes for all cities, regardless of city size classification. Metro Cities opposes the imposition of legislative mandates that increase local costs without a corresponding state appropriation or funding mechanism. Unfunded mandates potentially increase property taxes and impede cities' ability to fund traditional service needs. To allow for greater collaboration and flexibility in providing local services, Metro Cities encourages the removal of barriers to coordination between cities and other units of government or entities. 2-B City Enterprise Activities Creation of an enterprise operation allows a city to provide a desired service while maintaining financial and management control. The state should refrain from infringing on this ability to provide and manage services for the benefit of a local community and residents. Metro Cities supports cities having authority to establish city enterprise operations in response to community needs, local preferences, or state mandates, or that help ensure residents' quality of life. 2-C Firearms on City Property Cities should be allowed to prohibit handguns and other weapons in city-owned buildings, facilities, and parks and to determine whether to allow permit-holders to bring guns into municipal buildings,liquor stores,city council chambers and city sponsored youth activities. It is not Metro Cities' intention for cities to have the authority to prohibit legal weapons in parking lots, on city streets, city sidewalks or on locally approved hunting land. Metro Cities supports local control to allow or prohibit handguns and other weapons on city-owned property. 2023 Legislative Policies i i General Government 2-D 911 Telephone Tax Public safety answering points (PSAPs) must be able to continue to rely on state 911 revenues to pay for upgrades and modifications to local 911 systems, maintenance and operational support, and dispatcher training. Metro Cities supports state funding for technology and training necessary to provide the number and location of wireless and voice over internet protocol (VoIP) calls to 911 on computer screens and transmit that data to police, fire and first responders. 2-E 800 MHz Radio System Metro Cities urges the Legislature to provide cities with the financial means to obtain required infrastructure and subscriber equipment (portable and mobile radios) as well as provide funding for operating costs, since the prime purpose of this system is to allow public safety agencies and other units of government the ability to communicate effectively. Metro Cities supports the work of the Metropolitan Emergency Services Board(previously the Metropolitan Radio Board) in implementing and maintaining the 800 MHz radio system so long as cities are not forced to modify their current systems or become a part of the 800 MHz Radio System unless they so choose. 2-F Building Codes Thousands of new housing units as well as commercial and industrial buildings are constructed annually in the metropolitan area. The State Building Code (SBC) sets statewide standards for the construction,reconstruction,alteration,and repair of buildings and other structures governed by the code. A building code provides many benefits, including uniformity of construction standards in the building industry, consistency in code interpretation and enforcement, and life- safety guidance. Metro Cities supports an equitable distribution of fees from the Construction Code Fund, with proportional distribution based on the area of enforcement where fees were received. Metro Cities further supports efforts by the state,cities,and builders to collectively identify appropriate uses for the fund, including education, analysis of new materials and construction techniques,building code updating, building inspector training, and development of performance standards and identification of construction"best practices." Metro Cities supports including the International Green Construction Code as an optional appendix to the State Building Code to allow cities to utilize appropriate parts of those guidelines in their communities. Metro Cities also supports adopting the international energy conservation code to the state building code without amendments.Metro Cities does not support legislative solutions that fail to recognize the interrelationships among builders, state building codes and cities. Metro Cities supports efforts to increase awareness of the potential impacts and benefits of requiring sprinklers in new homes and townhouses. Metro Cities supports discussion and 2023 Legislative Policies 12 General Government the dissemination of information on these impacts via the code adoption process through the Department of Labor and Industry.Metro Cities supports adopting and amending the State Building Code through the rulemaking process and opposes legislative changes to building codes absent unusual or extraordinary circumstances. As energy costs continue to rise, more attention must be paid to the poor energy efficiency of much of the existing housing stock as well as commercial and industrial buildings. Homes and other buildings that are energy inefficient are more costly to maintain and create added cost to ownership and occupancy. Making homes and buildings more energy efficient will make them more affordable to operate and will help the state achieve energy demand goals and will reduce greenhouse gas emissions. This includes supporting legislation to increase the efficiency of buildings on a pathway toward net zero energy. Metro Cities supports state funding and technical support for programs that provide support for property owners for weatherization and energy efficiency improvements, including programs available for local governments. While a single set of coordinated codes helps provide consistency in code administration and enforcement,implementation of sustainable building design,construction,and operation does not readily integrate with the existing state building and energy code system. As a result, many cities are interested in adopting stronger local standards for sustainable development and conservation. Metro Cities supports authorizing cities to employ stronger local standards for sustainable development and conservation that will help inform the state code development process. The state should include an optional sustainable appendix to the State Building Code to allow cities to utilize appropriate parts of guidelines in their communities.Metro Cities also supports the state adopting an advanced energy building standard for buildings within the State Building Code and allowing cities to adopt their own enhanced standards. 2-G Administrative Fines Traditional methods of citation,enforcement and prosecution have met with increasing costs to local units of government. The use of administrative fines is a tool to moderate those costs. Metro Cities supports the administrative fine authority that allows cities to issue administrative fines for defined local traffic offenses and supports further modifications to enhance functionality of this authority.Metro Cities continues to support cities' authority to use administrative fines for regulatory ordinances such as building codes,zoning codes, health codes, and public safety and nuisance ordinances. Metro Cities supports the use of city administrative fines, at a minimum, for regulatory matters that are not duplicative of misdemeanor or higher-level state traffic and criminal offenses. Metro Cities also endorses a fair hearing process before a disinterested third party. 2023 Legislative Policies 13 General Government 2-H Residential Programs Sufficient funding and oversight is needed to ensure that residents living in residential programs have appropriate care and supervision and that neighborhoods are not disproportionately impacted by high concentrations of residential programs. Historically, federal and state laws have discouraged the concentration of residential group homes so as not to promote areas that reinforce institutional quality settings. Under current law, operators of certain residential programs are not required to notify cities when they intend to purchase single-family housing for this purpose. Cities do not have the authority to regulate the locations of residential programs. Cities have reasonable concerns about high concentrations of these facilities in residential neighborhoods, and additional traffic and service deliveries surrounding these facilities when they are grouped closely together. Municipalities recognize and support the services residential programs provide.However,cities also have an interest in preserving balance between residential programs and other uses in residential neighborhoods. Providers applying to operate residential programs should be required to notify the city when applying for licensure to be informed of local ordinance requirements as a part of the application process.Licensing agencies should be required to notify the city of properties receiving licensure to be operated as residential programs. Metro Cities supports changes to Minn.Stat. §245A.11,subd.4,to allow for appropriate non-concentration standards for all types of cities to prevent clustering. Metro Cities supports statutory modifications to require licensed agencies and licensed providers that operate residential programs to notify the city of properties being operated as residential programs.Metro Cities also supports the establishment of appropriate non-concentration standards for residential programs,to prevent clustering, and supports enforcement of these rules by the appropriate county agencies. 2-I Annexation Attempts have been made in recent years to reduce tensions between cities and townships in annexations. A Municipal Boundary Adjustment Task Force worked to develop recommendations regarding best practices annexation training for city and township officials to better communicate and jointly plan potential annexations. While the task force defined differences between cities and townships, no significant advancements were made in creating best practices. Metro Cities supports continued legislative efforts to develop recommendations regarding best practices and annexation training for city and township officials to better communicate and plan for potential annexations. Further, Metro Cities supports substantive changes to the state's annexation laws that will lead to better land use planning, energy conservation,greater environmental protection,fairer tax bases,clarification of fee reimbursement and fewer conflicts between townships and cities. Metro Cities also supports technical annexation changes that are agreed to by cities and townships. 2023 Legislative Policies 14 General Government 2-J Statewide Funding Sources for Local Issues with Regional Impact Many issues including,but not limited to,a metropolitan area groundwater monitoring network, emerald ash borer management,perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS/PFOS), and the cleanup of storm-water retention ponds, come with significant local costs, and have effects that reach beyond municipal boundaries. Metro Cities supports the availability of statewide funding sources to address local issues that have regional or statewide significance or are caused by state or regional actions. Metro Cities opposes any requirement to enact ordinances more restrictive than state law in exchange for access to these funds. 2-K Urban Forest Management Funding Urban forests are an essential local infrastructure component. Dutch elm disease, oak wilt disease, drought, storms, and emerald ash borer threaten public investments in trees and controlling these issues can be greatly consequential for city budgets. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, through its Urban and Community Forestry program, and the Minnesota Department of Agriculture, through its Shade Tree and Invasive Species program, have regulatory authority to direct tree sanitation and control programs. Although these programs allow for addressing some tree disease,pest, and other problems, funding has been inadequate to meet the need of cities to build capacity for tree programs and respond to catastrophic problems. Cities share the goal of the state's Re-leaf Program—promoting and funding the inventory, planning,planting, maintenance, and improvement of trees in cities throughout the state. In addition, economic and environmental gains for storm water management, climate change mitigation, air quality management, tourism, recreation, and other benefits must be protected from tree loss.A lack of timely investment in urban forests costs cities significantly more in the long run. Metro Cities supports funding for a state matching grant program to assist cities with building and increasing capacity for urban forest management, meeting the costs of preparing for, and responding to, catastrophic urban forest problems and preventing further loss and increasing canopy coverage. Specifically, direct grants to cities are desperately needed for the identification,removal,replacement,and treatment of trees related to management of emerald ash borer(EAB). The state should establish an ongoing grant program with annual funding that is usable for those activities. 2-L Pollinator Habitat Resources Recent declines in the abundance of pollinator insects, such as bees and butterflies, have been identified by the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization as a threat to food security, as these insects are an important method of plant pollination. According to the US Fish and Wildlife Service, the main threats facing pollinators are habitat loss, degradation and fragmentation. Pollinators lose food and nesting sites they need to survive when native vegetation is replaced by roadways, manicured lawns, crops and non-native gardens. This can have added detriment to pollinators that migrate.Research has shown that providing these insects 2023 Legislative Policies 15 General Government with more habitat can create the conditions for these insect populations to recover. Converting traditional grass lawns has been identified as way to increase pollinator habitat. The Minnesota Legislature created the Lawns to Legumes program, which provides grants to private homeowners to convert traditional lawns to pollinator friendly landscape. Metro Cities supports state funding for the Lawns to Legumes program and supports expanding eligibility of this program to cities. Metro Cities supports state funding to programs that create pollinator habitat on both public and private lands. 2-M Regulation of Harmful Substances and Products In metropolitan regions where most cities share boundaries with other cities, local bans of harmful drugs and substances such as synthetic drugs,which have been found to be dangerous, do not eliminate access to these products unless all cities take the same regulatory action. Metro Cities supports statewide regulation and prohibition of products or substances in circumstances where there is evidence that products present a danger to anyone who uses them, where there is broad local support for a ban and where corresponding regulatory issues have regional or statewide significance. In addition, the Legislature should provide for the regulation of products that are known to damage water quality,sewer collection,and storm and wastewater treatment systems,not just at the treatment and infrastructure maintenance levels,but at the consumer and manufacturing levels, through accurate labeling of products, public education, and recycling and re-use programs. 2-N Private Well Drilling Restriction Authority Cities are authorized to enact ordinances that disallow the placement of private wells within city limits to ensure both water safety and availability for residents and businesses. This authority is important for the appropriate management of local water supply conservation efforts. Municipal water systems are financially dependent upon users to operate and maintain the system.A loss of significant rate payers resulting from unregulated private well drilling would economically destabilize water systems and could lead to contamination of the water supply. Metro Cities supports current law authorizing cities to regulate and prohibit the placement of private wells within municipal utility service boundaries and opposes any attempt to remove or alter that authority. Metro Cities supports funding that can be used to cap private wells. 2-0 Organized Waste Collection Cities over 1,000 in population are required by law to ensure all residents have solid waste collection available to them. A city can meet the statutory requirement by licensing haulers to operate in an open collection system, authorize city employees to collect waste, or implement organized collection through one or multiple haulers to increase efficiency,reduce truck traffic and control costs to residents. 2023 Legislative Policies 16 General Government Metro Cities supports current laws that allow cities to work with existing haulers to achieve the benefits of organized collection or investigate the merits of organized collection without the pressure of a rigid timeline and requirement to pass 'an intent to organize' at the beginning of the discussion process. Metro Cities opposes any legislation that would further increase the cost or further complicate the process cities are required to follow to organize waste collection or prohibit cities from implementing, expanding or using organized waste collection. Metro Cities supports state funding to local governments to increase the availability of material and organic recycling. 2-P Election Administration Cities play a critical role in managing and ensuring the integrity of elections. Any changes made to election laws should not place undue financial or administrative burdens on local governments. Metro Cities supports reimbursement by the state to local units of government for any costs associated with changes to election laws. Metro Cities supports laws to increase efficiencies in administering absentee ballots,to reduce the potential for errors and to improve absentee balloting processes. State laws that allow the filling of municipal vacancies by special election on one of four days specified in law,can create logistical and financial challenges for municipalities.Metro Cities supports changes to state laws that allow sufficient flexibility for municipalities in addressing vacancies in municipal offices. Metro Cities further supports: • Laws allowing in-person absentee voters to place their ballots in a secure tabulator, and statutory changes to allow this for the duration of absentee voting; • Establishing an earlier deadline for ending in-person absentee voting; • Revising absentee ballot regulations to allow any person 18 and older to witness the absentee process and sign the envelope as a witness; and • Authorizing cities with health care facilities to schedule election judges to conduct absentee voting at an earlier date in health care facilities. 2-Q Utility Franchise Fees, Accountability and Cost Transparency Minnesota cities are authorized by Minn. Stat. 216B and Minn. Stat. § 301B.01 to require a public utility(gas or electric)that provides services to the city or occupies the public right of way within a city to obtain a franchise. Several metro area cities have entered agreements that require the utility to pay a fee to help offset costs of maintaining the right of way. Cities are also adopting energy policies that use renewable energy resources to light or heat 2023 Legislative Policies 17 General Government public facilities. Policies and programs have also been instituted in cooperation with the public utility franchisee to increase energy efficiency for all users. Cities also contract, at city expense, with public utilities to"underground"wires. State laws also require energy companies to provide more electric energy from renewable sources. The specific amounts vary by type of utility. Metro Cities supports state policies adopted by legislation or through rules of the Public Utility Commission that provide cities with the authority to include city energy policies and priorities in a franchise or similar agreement with a franchisee. Metro Cities supports greater accountability and transparency for city paid costs associated with underground utility and similar work performed by electric utilities as part of a local project. 2-R Water Supply Municipal water suppliers are charged with meeting the water supply needs of their communities and work to do so with safe, reliable, and cost-effective systems that are sustainable both for established cities and for all future growth. The aquifers in the metropolitan area cross municipal boundaries and therefore require a coordinated regional approach to planning for their future availability. Currently,approximately 75% of municipal water supply in the metropolitan area comes from groundwater. With proper management of the resource, the current water supply in the region is adequate; however, Metropolitan Council projections predict localized declines in aquifer availability due to population growth estimates if current usage levels are maintained. Regulation of water is complex and compartmentalized.Various agencies permit its use,plan for its availability, regulate stormwater, treat wastewater and protect the safety of water. To ensure that water supply remains adequate and sustainable across the region, we must understand how much water can be sustainably drawn from the aquifers and what effect increases in re-use, conservation and recharge can have on the sustainability and availability of both groundwater and surface water. Many of these strategies cross agency jurisdictions and will require improved coordination and cooperation. Municipal water suppliers have made significant infrastructure investments in their systems based on calculated water availability and DNR permits. Proposals to reduce the reliance on groundwater by switching municipal water systems from groundwater to surface water supplies will come with significant costs that could place excessive burdens on local resources. The outcomes and benefits of re-balancing the mix of groundwater and surface water use for specific municipalities and the region must be identifiable before any projects are undertaken. The sustainability of our water supply is an issue of regional and statewide significance and the expense of any necessary projects that benefit the region should not fall on individual cities.Any attempts to address water supply sustainability must also take into account all water users, including municipal water suppliers, industry,private wells, agriculture and contamination containment. The metropolitan region must consider the effects of groundwater use beyond the borders of the 2023 Legislative Policies 18 General Government metropolitan area on the region's groundwater availability and the cost of treating contaminants in surface water that comes into the metropolitan area for use. Metro Cities supports the removal of barriers to wastewater and storm water re-use, improved inter-agency coordination,clarifying the appropriate roles of local,regional and state governments with respect to water, streamlining and consolidating permit approval processes and the availability of statewide resources to plan for and ensure the future sustainability of water supply in the metropolitan area. Metro Cities also encourages the Metropolitan Council,in consultation with municipalities,to find ways to re-use wastewater and to develop other strategies to improve conservation. Metro Cities supports state funding for costs associated with converting water supply from groundwater to surface water and funds to encourage and promote water conservation as a strategy to improve water sustainability and to improve and protect water quality. 2-S Regulation of Massage Therapists In the absence of statewide regulation for massage therapy practitioners, many cities have enacted local ordinances that require massage therapists to obtain a local professional license to assist law enforcement in differentiating between legitimate providers and illegitimate businesses fronting as massage therapy establishments. Metro Cities supports statewide registration or licensure of massage therapists to aid local law enforcement efforts in this area. Metro Cities supports cities' ability to continue to license massage therapy businesses. 2-T Peace Officer Arbitration Reform Many municipalities in the metropolitan area provide law enforcement services and employ licensed peace officers. To ensure the public's safety and trust, and to strengthen collaboration between citizens and peace officers, cities must have the authority to effectively govern local law enforcement agencies. City officials are ultimately responsible for the safety and protection of the local community. Metro Cities supports statutory arbitration reforms to allow for the discipline,including removal, of law enforcement officers who have been found to have violated local law enforcement agency policies. Metro Cities further supports a reasonable standard of review in law enforcement arbitration cases, which would limit the determination of arbitrators to whether the actions of an employer were reasonable and consistent with city and agency policies.Metro Cities further supports using administrative law judges (ALJs) or arbitration to address grievances and discipline related to police misconduct. 2-U Public Safety Training and Resources Metro Cities acknowledges that the tasks public safety responders have been asked to address 2023 Legislative Policies 19 General Government are increasingly the result of inadequate social services and programs. Metro Cities recognizes the need for adequate resources for social service and mental health services and programs to help reduce the need for public safety responders to perform these services. Metro Cities supports state funding for public safety responders training, including training for crisis management,cultural awareness and implicit bias,mental health and de-escalation, and supports funding for equipment such as body cameras. Metro Cities supports state funding for public safety innovation at the local level. This could include funding for imbedded social workers or mental health crisis response. 2-V Race Equity In the seven-county metropolitan region,people of color represent 28% of the population, and this percentage is expected to grow to 44%by 2050, according to the current population forecast from the Metropolitan Council. As racial and ethnic diversity increases in the region,people of color continue to experience significant barriers in housing,employment,criminal justice,public infrastructure, health, and education, and disparities are becoming more apparent with the COVID-19 pandemic and civil unrest that is occurring in many communities. Across the metropolitan region,many cities are working to examine local policies and systems, to revise the delivery of public services, and to allocate resources to help advance race equity. All levels of government as well as the nonprofit and business sectors have roles to play in addressing race inequities and must work collaboratively to ensure that services and resources are considered, designed and implemented in a comprehensive,purposeful, informed and inclusive way to achieve race equity. Metro Cities supports: • An examination and revision of existing state,regional,county and city laws, ordinances and policies to address racial disparities; • State, regional, county and city resources to assist with comprehensive data collection,disaggregation and sharing to ensure informed policy and funding decisions at all levels of government; • Funding to assist in the development of tools and resources that advance racially equitable outcomes; • Activating partnerships among state, regional, and local governmental institutions and other entities to advance race equity. 2-W Street Racing Street racing is an issue of increasing concern for cities across the metropolitan region. This activity is 2023 Legislative Policies 20 General Government highly mobile,is strongly associated with other illegal activity and poses significant public safety risks for participants, third-party observers, and the general public. Metro Cities supports modifications to state laws to prohibit street racing and activities associated with promoting and undertaking the activity of street racing. Specifically, Metro Cities supports statutory changes that address the activity and associated risks posed by street racing,sliding,and drifting.These could include penalties such as license suspension,minimum impoundment periods, and vehicle forfeiture. Metro Cities supports state funding to help prevent and respond to street racing activity. This could include funding for State Patrol air supports and funding for costs, including overtime, associated with targeted law enforcement saturations and Toward Zero Deaths initiatives.Metro Cities also supports state resources to increase the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension's intelligence gathering capabilities and to enhance existing coordination efforts among law enforcement agencies. Metro Cities further recognizes the importance and value of diversion programs that emphasize behavior modifications,which can help curb illegal activity and minimize recidivism. 2-X Carjacking The crime of carjacking has increased significantly in the metropolitan region,with serious consequences for individual and community public safety. Metro Cities supports the consideration by the Legislature of statutory changes to address the severity of this crime. This includes state funding to help state and local law enforcement agencies prevent and respond to carjacking. This could include funding for State Patrol air supports and for costs, including overtime, associated with targeted law enforcement saturations. Metro Cities also supports state resources to increase the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension's intelligence gathering capabilities and to enhance existing coordination efforts among law enforcement agencies. Metro Cities further recognizes the importance and value of diversion programs that emphasize behavior modifications,which can help curb illegal activity and minimize recidivism. 2-Y Catalytic Converter Theft Catalytic converter thefts have increased significantly across the metropolitan region and state. Stolen catalytic converters are sold to scrap metal dealers because they contain precious metals like platinum, palladium, and rhodium. Catalytic converter thefts have consequences for both individual and community public safety. Metro Cities supports statutory changes making it illegal to be in possession of one or more catalytic converters unless an individual can show that it belongs to a vehicle they own, or they can provide a legal receipt of the catalytic converter from the vehicle owner.Metro Cities further supports statutory changes making it illegal for a scrap metal dealer to purchase a 2023 Legislative Policies 21 General Government catalytic converter from any person other than a legitimate automobile recycling facility or an individual who can provide evidence of the catalytic converter's lawful removal. 2023 Legislative Policies 22 Housing & Economic Development ._ ._ ._ ..m. Policies 3-A to 3-J: Introduction While the provision of housing is predominantly a private sector,market-driven activity,all levels of government—federal, state, regional and local—have a role in facilitating the production and preservation of affordable housing in Minnesota. Adequate affordable housing is a significant concern for the metropolitan region and effective approaches require participation from all levels of government, the private sector, and nonprofit groups. 3-A City Role in Housing Cities in Minnesota are responsible for most ground-level housing policy, including land use planning, code enforcement, rental licensing, and often the packaging of multi-level financial incentives. Cities are responsible for ensuring local health and safety and the structural soundness and livability of the local housing stock through building permits and inspections. Cities are charged with providing public infrastructure to serve current and future residents and must assess the effects of a new development on parks, local roads,water, sanitary sewer, and stormwater capacities to ensure that additional needs for infrastructure are assumed by the new development and not current taxpayers. It is the city that assumes the future financial responsibility, management, and maintenance for improvements and infrastructure after a developer has completed a project. It is also the responsibility of cities to periodically review local requirements such as land use regulations and ordinances, and make long range plans consistent with state statute,to ensure that they are consistent with these purposes. While local government financial resources constitute a relatively small portion of the total costs of providing housing, many cities take on a significant administrative burden by providing financial incentives and regulatory relief,participating in state and regional housing programs, and supporting either local or countywide housing and redevelopment authorities and community development agencies. When a developer seeks to advance a development proposal that does not meet straight housing and mixed-use zoning codes and requirements, the developer may request a planned unit development(PUD) agreement with a city. PUDs, where appropriate, can provide zoning flexibility to develop a site that is otherwise not permitted by a city code. The use of PUDs may allow for more variety and creativity in land uses,increased density on a site,internal transfers of density, construction phasing, reduced setbacks, and a potential for lower development costs. In the interest of adhering to local long-range plans and managing local health, safety, viability, and welfare needs, a city may request certain public benefits from a developer, including but not limited to additional open space,preservation of wooded land and environmentally sensitive areas, landscaping along major roadways, providing a mix of housing types, and enhanced design and landscaping features. Cities may also provide a developer with credit for investments in public infrastructure greater than would be minimally required, including water, sanitary sewer, stormwater, or road infrastructure. 2023 Legislative Policies 23 Housing & Economic Development Metro Cities strongly opposes any effort to reduce,alter or interfere with cities' authority to carry out these functions in a locally determined manner. Metro Cities supports exceptions to the land use timelines in Minn. Stat. § 15.99 in the event of extenuating local and state circumstances.Metro Cities supports local authority determination when exercising the use of exceptions, recognizing projects may be in different stages of approval. If a state of emergency limits the ability of city staff to complete a land use review,it should not result in de facto approval of an application. 3-B City Role in Affordable and Life Cycle Housing Metro Cities supports housing that is affordable and appropriate for people at all stages of life.A variety of housing opportunities are important to the economic and social well-being of local communities and the metropolitan region. The region faces challenges in meeting the existing and future housing needs of low and moderate-income residents.Existing housing stock is aging, with roughly half older than 40 years old, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. Older housing stock can be more affordable; however, it requires investments to remain viable. Private investors have purchased subsidized and unsubsidized rental units,made improvements, and charged higher rents that have made access to previously affordable units prohibitive for low and moderate-income residents. This investor ownership has converted owner-occupied houses to rental houses, which has impacted the ability of lower-income renters to become homeowners and build wealth. Neighbors and cities have seen a lack of investment in these rental homes that has led to the deterioration of the housing stock. The Metropolitan Council has projected the region will add nearly 35,000 households between 2021 and 2030 that will need affordable housing and require a subsidy of$5 billion to meet the needs of households earning up to 50 percent area median income. Cities should work with the private and nonprofit sectors, counties, state agencies and the Metropolitan Council to ensure the best use of new and existing tools and resources to produce new housing and preserve existing affordable housing. Cities can facilitate the production and preservation of affordable and life cycle housing by: • Applying for funding from available grant and loan programs; • Using city and county funds to support affordable housing. This can include creating a local or regional housing trust fund to support affordable housing; • Providing information, encouraging participation and incentivizing participation in the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program to landlords; • Working with developers and residents to blend affordable housing into new and existing neighborhoods, including locations with access to amenities and services; • Working with the state and Metropolitan Council to recognize the relationship between 2023 Legislative Policies 24 Housing & Economic Development housing and mobility options, including transit and pedestrian routes; • Periodically examining local requirements,policies and review processes to determine their impacts on the construction of affordable housing; • Considering criteria under which a city may change its fee structure in support of additional affordable housing; • Supporting housing options that meet a city's current and future demographics,including family size, age, mobility, and ability levels; • Supporting housing design that is flexible,accessible and usable for residents with varied abilities at multiple stages of life; • Supporting housing with supportive services for people with disabilities; • Employing innovative strategies to advance affordable housing needs such as public- private partnerships or creative packaging of regulatory relief and incentives; • Using available regulatory mechanisms to shape housing communities; • Recognizing the inventory of subsidized and unsubsidized(naturally occurring) affordable housing; • Tracking the impacts on the housing market of investor-owned homes and enacting local strategies and policies that support home purchases by owners who reside in the homes; • Supporting state solutions to provide cities with tools to mitigate any negative impacts on city housing stock and prospective homebuyers due to investor- owned purchasing of homes; and • Working collaboratively with buyers and sellers of naturally occurring affordable housing to retain affordability. 3-C Inclusionary Housing While Metro Cities believes there are cost savings to be achieved through regulatory reform, density bonuses as determined by local communities, and fee waivers, Metro Cities does not believe a mandatory inclusionary housing approach can achieve desired levels of affordability solely through these steps. Several cities have established local inclusionary housing policies,in some cases requiring the creation of affordable units if the housing development uses public financial assistance or connecting the policy to zoning and land use changes. The Metropolitan Council, in distributing the regional allocation of housing need, must recognize both the opportunities and financial limitations of cities. The Council should partner with cities to 2023 Legislative Policies 25 Housing & Economic Development facilitate the creation of affordable housing through direct financial assistance and/or advocating for additional resources through the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency. Metro Cities supports the location of affordable housing in residential and mixed-use neighborhoods throughout a city.Metro Cities supports a city's authority to enact its own inclusionary housing policy. However, Metro Cities does not support passage of a mandatory inclusionary housing state law imposed on local governments that would require a certain percentage of units in all new housing developments to be affordable to households at specific income levels. 3-D Metropolitan Council Role in Housing The Metropolitan Council is statutorily required to assist cities with meeting the provisions of the Land Use Planning Act(LUPA)under Minn. Stat. § 473. The LUPA requires cities to adopt sufficient standards,plans and programs to meet their local share of the region's overall projected need for low and moderate-income housing. The Council's responsibilities include the preparation and adoption of guidelines and procedures to assist local government units with accomplishing the requirements of the LUPA. The Metropolitan Council also offers programs and initiatives to create affordable housing opportunities,including the Livable Communities Act programs and operation of a metropolitan housing and redevelopment authority. Unlike parks, transit and wastewater, housing is not a statutory regional system. The Metropolitan Council's role,responsibilities and authority are more limited in scope,centered on assisting local governments by identifying the allocation of need for affordable housing, projecting regional growth and identifying available tools, resources, technical assistance and methods that cities can use to create and promote affordable housing opportunities in their communities. The Metropolitan Council should work in partnership with local governments to ensure that the range of housing needs for people at various life cycles and incomes can be met. Metro Cities opposes the elevation of housing to "Regional System" status. Metro Cities supports removing the Metropolitan Council's review and comment authority connected to housing revenue bonds under Minn. Stat. § 462C.04. In 2014,the Metropolitan Council released a housing policy plan,the first of its kind in nearly 30 years. A housing policy plan should include defined local,regional, and state roles for the provision of housing in all sectors, identify the availability of and need for tools and resources for affordable and life-cycle housing,be explicit in supporting partnerships for the advocacy for state and federal resources for housing, and encompass policies,best practices, and technical guidance for all types of housing. A plan should also recognize the diversity in local needs, characteristics, and resources. Metro Cities supports strategies such as regional and sub-regional cooperation and the sharing of best practices among local governments and other entities and partners to address the region's affordable housing needs. 2023 Legislative Policies 26 Housing & Economic Development A policy plan should allow for ongoing research and analysis by the Metropolitan Council to provide communities with timely and updated information on regional and local housing needs and market trends as regional and local needs change and evolve. Metro Cities supports the solicitation and use of local data, inputs and analyses and local governments' review of such data. Metro Cities supports continued city representation in any updated or new regional housing policy plan and other regional housing policy considerations. 3-E Allocation of Affordable Housing Need The affordable housing need allocation methodology determines the number of needed affordable housing units for the metropolitan region and distributes the need by assigning each city its fair share through an affordable housing need number. Minn. Stat. § 473.859 requires cities to guide sufficient land to accommodate local shares of the region's affordable housing need. Metro Cities supports additional Metropolitan Council resources to assist cities in meeting cities' share of the region's affordable housing needs. Metro Cities supports the creation of a variety of housing opportunities. However, the provision of affordable and lifecycle housing is a shared responsibility between the private sector and government at all levels, including the federal government, state government and Metropolitan Council. Land economics, construction costs,labor costs, and infrastructure needs create barriers to the creation of affordable housing that cities cannot overcome without assistance. Therefore,Metro Cities supports a Metropolitan Council affordable housing policy and allocation of need methodology that recognizes the following tenets: • Regional housing policies characterize individual city and sub-regional housing numbers as a range of needs in the community; • Cities need significant financial assistance from the federal and state government, as well as the Metropolitan Council, to make progress toward creating additional affordable housing and preserving existing affordable housing; • Metropolitan Council planning and policies must be more closely aligned to help ensure that resources for transportation and transit are available to assist communities in addressing their local share of the regional affordable housing need and to ensure that all populations have adequate mobility to reach jobs, education and other destinations regardless of where they live; • The Metropolitan Council will not hold cities responsible if a city does not meet its affordable housing need number. However, efforts to produce affordable housing may be considered when awarding grants; • The Metropolitan Council,with input by local government representatives, should examine the allocation of need methodology with respect to the relationship between 2023 Legislative Policies 27 Housing & Economic Development the regional allocation and the local share of the need. The formula should also be routinely evaluated to determine if market conditions have changed or if underlying conditions should prompt readjustment of the formula; • The Council should use a methodology that incorporates data accumulated by individual cities and not limited to census driven or policy driven growth projections; • The formula should be adjusted to better reflect the balance and breadth of existing subsidized and naturally occurring affordable housing stocks; and • The Council should work with local governments through an appeals process in order to resolve any local issues and concerns with respect to the need allocations. 3-F Housing Policy and Production Survey The Metropolitan Council calculates a city's housing production annually. Production information is collected through an annual city survey as well as Council data. Cities participating in Livable Communities are required to include their housing action plan and ALHOA funding amounts in their survey responses. Beginning in 2022 the Council will compile the data in a report to share city practices and funding sources that support the creation of new affordable housing units. Metro Cities supports a regular review of the survey questions and use of data,with city input.Any proposed new,deleted,or expanded uses or programs in which data from the Housing Policy and Production Survey would be used should be reviewed by local officials and Metro Cities. Metro Cities supports a consistent schedule for sending the annual housing production survey to cities. 3-G State Role in Housing The state must be an active participant in providing funding for housing, including direct funding, financial incentives, and initiatives to assist local governments and developers to support affordable housing and housing appropriate for people at all stages of life. State funding is a major and necessary component for the provision of housing. Current resource levels are insufficient to meet the spectrum of needs in the metropolitan region and across the state. Primarily through programs administered by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency(MHFA), the state establishes the general direction and prioritization of housing issues, and financially supports a variety of housing, including transitional housing, privately and publicly-owned housing, supportive housing, senior housing, workforce housing, and family housing. Minnesota's low-income rental property classification, commonly known as class 4d, allows landlords to certify qualifying low-income rental property. The state must continue to be an active partner in addressing life cycle and affordable housing needs. Workforce housing is generally defined as housing that supports economic development and job 28 2023 Legislative Policies Housing & Economic Development growth and is affordable to the local workforce. A statewide program, administered through the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency, supports workforce homeownership efforts in the metropolitan area. State policies and funding should recognize that affordable housing options that are accessible to jobs and meet the needs of a city's workforce are important to the economic competitiveness of cities and the metro region.In addition, significant housing related racial disparities persist in Minnesota, especially as it relates to the percentage of households of color who pay more than 30 percent of their income in housing costs and as it relates to the significant disparity gap in homeownership rates. Metro Cities supports: • Increased,sustainable and adequate state funding for new and existing programs that support life cycle, workforce and affordable housing, address homeownership disparities,address foreclosure mitigation,address housing for families with children, and support senior, transitional and emergency housing for the metro region; • A state match for local and regional housing trust fund investments and local policies in support of affordable housing.State funds should be issued on a timeline that works with a city's budget process; • Private sector funding for workforce housing; • Housing programs that assist housing development, preservation and maintenance of existing housing stock, including unsubsidized, naturally occurring affordable housing that is affordable to residents throughout the low-to-moderate income range; • State funded housing programs,including housing assistance,to help with affordability; • Housing programs designed to develop market rate housing in census blocks with emerging or high concentrations of poverty, where the private market might not otherwise invest,as a means of creating mixed-income communities and reconciling affordable housing with community development goals; • Continuing the policy of using the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency's investment earnings for housing programs; • City input into state legislation and administrative policies regarding distribution of tax credits and tax-exempt bonding; • Exemptions from,or reductions to sales,use and transaction taxes applied to the development and production of affordable housing; • Consideration of the use of state bond proceeds and other appropriations for land banking,land trusts, and rehabilitation and construction of affordable housing; • Programs that help avoid foreclosures, improve homeownership rates and reduce 2023 Legislative Policies 29 Housing & Economic Development racial disparities through homeownership assistance programs and counseling services, including down payment assistance and pre-purchasing counseling to improve financial wellness and inform homeowner and potential homeowners of their rights, options, and costs associated with owning a home; • State tenant protection policies as well as a city's ability to enact tenant protections to support access to affordable housing and housing stability for tenants; • Housing stability for renters through policies that mitigate the impact of or reduces the number of evictions filed; • Policies that encourage public housing authorities and owners of federally assisted housing to consider a holistic approach to selecting tenants during the application and screening process,and avoid excluding tenants solely based on criminal records; • Exploring best practices toward increased housing affordability for residents,housing maintenance standards and providing quality housing for residents. Cities should work with rental housing owners and operators when establishing best practices; • Preserving the state 4d low-income property tax classification which provides a property tax benefit to qualifying low-income rental properties. Metro Cities supported a 2021 Department of Revenue evaluation and report of the 4d low-income property tax classification to determine how program changes could affect renters, landlords and property taxpayers. Metro Cities opposes any changes to the 4d program that substantially increases the tax responsibility for residents and businesses or increases the tax benefit for landlords without including increased benefits for renters of 4d units including but not limited to deeper affordability or property reinvestment. Metro Cities supports the implementation of a reporting process for landlords and a sunset period for any changes made to the program to evaluate the range of impacts that expanding the program may have; • An affordable housing tax credit to help spur construction and secure additional private investment. This incentive could be used in conjunction with city, regional, or other state incentives; and • Maintaining existing municipal authority to establish a housing improvement area (HIA). If the Legislature grants multi-jurisdictional entities the authority to create HIAs, creation of an HIA must require municipal approval. 3-H Federal Role in Affordable and Workforce Housing Federal funding plays a critical role in aiding states and local governments in their efforts to maintain and increase affordable and workforce housing.Providing working families access to housing is an important piece to the economic vitality of the region. Metro Cities encourages the federal government to maintain and increase current levels of 2023 Legislative Policies 30 Housing & Economic Development funding for affordable and workforce housing. Federal investment in affordable and workforce housing will maintain and increase the supply of affordable and life cycle housing as well as make housing more affordable through rental assistance programs such as the Section 8 housing choice voucher program. In July 2015,the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development(HUD)released a final rule on affirmatively furthering fair housing (AFFH)with an aim to provide communities that receive HUD funding with clear guidelines to meet their obligation under the Fair Housing Act of 1968 to promote and reduce barriers to fair housing and equal opportunity. HUD has since provided new guidance to comply with the AFFH rule. Opportunity Zones is a community development program established by Congress in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 to encourage long-term investments in low-income urban and rural communities nationwide.The Opportunity Zones program provides a tax incentive for investors to re-invest their unrealized capital gains into Opportunity Funds that are dedicated to investing into Opportunity Zones. The tax incentive is available for up to ten years. 128 census tracts were designated as Opportunity Zones in 2018. The United States Treasury released rules on April 17,2019 which provide guidance and clarification for investors and fund managers. It is anticipated that the Act may be a useful tool in spurring development in low- income communities and could help with business development and jobs. There are also questions about what impact the Act will have on the residents that live and businesses that operate in these communities today.For example,while development may have positive impacts such as increasing tax base or job opportunities, robust development could have unintended consequences such as displacement of current residents and businesses. Metro Cities urges the federal government to seek regular input from communities, especially from individuals and businesses within Opportunity Zones,regarding how the tool is being used, whether the tool is encouraging new development opportunities, and how community members who live in the Zones are impacted. The State of Minnesota should utilize community development resources to stimulate investment in Opportunity Zones and adopt policies that ensure that local residents, workers and businesses benefit from the investments. Metro Cities supports: • Preserving and increasing funding for the Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG) and the federal HOME program that are catalysts for creating and preserving affordable housing; • Preserving and increasing resources and incentives to sustain existing public housing throughout the Metro Area; • Maintaining the federal tax credit program to help spur construction and secure additional private investment,including making the four percent Low Income Housing Tax Credit a fixed rate as was done with the nine percent credit in 2015; 31 2023 Legislative Policies Housing & Economic Development • Creating and implementing a more streamlined procedural method for local units of government to participate in and access federal funding and services dealing with grants,loans,and tax incentive programs for economic and community development efforts; • Additional resources to assist communities to meet obligations to reduce barriers to and promote fair housing and equal opportunity; • Maintaining and increasing resources to Section 8 funding and to support incentives for rental property owners to participate in the program; • Federal funding programs for renters with limited income or fixed income; • Rental increase caps when the rent increase exceeds a 5-year running average; and • Federal funding to provide short-term assistance for HRAs to facilitate the sale of tax-exempt bonds. 3-I Vacant, Boarded, and Foreclosed Properties and Properties at Risk Abandoned residential and commercial properties can harm communities when vacant buildings result in reduced property values and increased crime. The additional public safety and code enforcement costs of managing vacant properties are a financial strain on cities. Metro Cities supports solutions to vacant and boarded properties that recognize: • Prevention is more cost effective than a cure; • The causes of this problem are many and varied,thus the solutions must be as well; and • It is not simply a"city"problem so cities must not be expected to bear the bulk of the burden of mitigation. Further,Metro Cities supports: • Registration of vacant and boarded properties; • Allowing cities to acquire vacant and boarded properties before deterioration and vandalism result in unsalvageable structures, including providing financial tools such as increasing eminent domain flexibility; • Improving the ability of cities to recoup the increased public safety,management, and enforcement costs related to vacant properties; • Improvement of the redemption process to provide increased notification to renters, 2023 Legislative Policies 32 Housing & Economic Development strengthen the ability of homeowners to retain their properties, and reduce the amount of time a property is vacant; • Expedition of the tax forfeiture process; • Increasing financial tools for neighborhood recovery efforts,including tax increment financing; and • Year-round notification by utility companies of properties not receiving utility service. 3-J Housing Ordinance Enforcement A Minnesota State Supreme Court ruling, Morris v. Sax, stated that provisions of the city of Morris'rental housing code were invalid because there were subjects dealt with under the state building code and the city was attempting to regulate these areas "differently from the state building code." Minn. Stat. § 326B.121, subdivision 1 states: "The State Building Code is the standard that applies statewide for the construction,reconstruction,alteration,repair, and use of buildings and other structures of the type governed by the code. The State Building Code supersedes the building code of any municipality."Subdivision 2 states: "A municipality must not by ordinance, or through development agreement, require building code provisions regulating components or systems of any structure that are different from any provision of the State Building Code. This subdivision does not prohibit a municipality from enacting or enforcing an ordinance requiring existing components or systems of any structure to be maintained in a safe and sanitary condition or in good repair,but not exceeding the standards under which the structure was built, reconstructed, or altered, or the component or system was installed,unless specific retroactive provisions for existing buildings have been adopted as part of the State Building Code. A municipality may,with the approval of the state building official,adopt an ordinance that is more restrictive than the State Building Code where geological conditions warrant a more restrictive ordinance. A municipality may appeal the disapproval of a more restrictive ordinance to the commissioner." Metro Cities supports the ability of cities to enforce all housing codes passed by a local municipality to maintain its housing stock. 3-K Economic Development, Redevelopment and Workforce Readiness The economic viability of the metropolitan area is enhanced by an array of economic development tools that create infrastructure,revitalize previously developed property,provide incentives for business development, support technological advances, support a trained workforce, and address disparities in economic development and workforce development. It should be the goal of the state to champion development and redevelopment by providing adequate and sustainable funding to assure competitiveness in a global marketplace. The state 2023 Legislative Policies 33 Housing & Economic Development should recognize the relationship between housing and economic development. Access to affordable child care supports working families and allows parents to enter or remain in the workforce. Economic development and redevelopment are not mutually exclusive—some projects require a boost on both counts. The State of Minnesota should recognize cities as the primary unit of government responsible for the implementation of economic development, redevelopment policies, and land use controls. 3-K (1) Economic Development For purposes of this section,economic development is defined as a form of development that can contain direct business assistance, infrastructure development, technical assistance, and policy support with the goal of sustainable job creation,job retention, appropriate state regulation or classification, or to nurture new or retain existing industry in the state. The measure of return on investment of public business subsidies should include the impact (positive or negative) of "spin-off development" or business development that is ancillary and supportive of the primary business. A strength of the regional economy is its economic diversity. Multiple industry clusters and sectors employ a specialized,trained workforce and support entrepreneurs in developing new businesses. Partnerships and collaborations among the state and local levels of government, higher education and industry should continue to develop,to commercialize new technologies and to support efforts to enhance the economic vitality of the region. While cities are the unit of local government primarily responsible for the implementation of economic development, counties have an interest in supporting local economic development efforts. Any creation of a county CDA, EDA or HRA with economic development powers should follow Minn. Stat. § 469.1082 that requires a city to adopt a resolution electing to participate. Cities can work with the public and private sectors to support the region's economic growth by reducing barriers to economic participation by people of color. Metro Cities supports state funded programs that support new and expanding businesses, infrastructure development and public-private partnerships. This includes the Minnesota Investment Fund, Job Creation Fund and Angel Tax Credit. Programs using statewide funding should strive to award funds balanced between the metro region and greater Minnesota. Metro Cities supports competitive funding for statewide grant programs such as the Minnesota Investment Fund (MIF) as opposed to direct legislative appropriations for projects from these funds.Metro Cities supports a percentage of MIF loan repayments to cities.The state should provide administrative support and technical assistance to cities that administer these programs. Applications for state MIF funds should allow a city to indicate support for a MIF grant or a loan. Metro Cities supports economic tools that facilitate job growth without relying solely on the property tax base; green job development and related innovation and entrepreneurship; programs to support minority business start-ups; small business financing tools including a state new markets tax credit program mirrored on the federal program; tools to attract and retain data centers and other IT facilities; access to affordable child care; and maintaining existing municipal authority to establish a special 2023 Legislative Policies 34 Housing & Economic Development service district(SSD).Metro Cities supports further study of allowing mixed-use buildings that have both commercial and residential uses to be included in an SSD. 3-K (2) Redevelopment Redevelopment facilitates the re-use of previously developed land, thereby leveling the playing field between greenfield and brownfield sites so that a developer can choose to locate on land that has already been used. Redeveloping properties supports community vibrancy and revitalization.Redevelopment increases the local property tax base, increases land values, provides more efficient use of new or existing public infrastructure(including public transit),reduces urban sprawl, and enhances the livability of neighborhoods. Jobs are created three times—at demolition and cleanup, during construction, and ongoing jobs tied to the new use. Redevelopment may occur on non-polluted land or on brownfields. Brownfields are abandoned, idled, or underused industrial and commercial properties where financing or redevelopment is complicated by actual or suspected environmental contamination.Federal,state,regional and local governments fund investigation and cleanup of blighted or other brownfield properties that allows for redevelopment without risking human health or potential environmental liabilities. Correcting and stabilizing polluted soils and former landfill sites allows cities to redevelop and reuse properties. For many cities in the metropolitan region,redevelopment is economic development. Metro Cities supports increased funding from federal, state and regional sources. The Metropolitan Council's Livable Communities Act programs fund redevelopment activities that support cleanup and tax base revitalization. Metro Cities supports allowing a maximum levy amount for this program, as provided under law. Metro Cities supports increased and sustained state funds for DEED-administered programs like the Redevelopment Grant and Demolition Loan Program, dedicated to metropolitan area projects, innovative Business Development Public Infrastructure grants, as well as increased, flexible and sustained funding for the Contamination Cleanup and Investigation Grant Program. The expansion of transit service throughout the region brings opportunity for redevelopment and transit-oriented development (TOD). Metro Cities supports financing, regulatory tools and increased flexibility in the use of Tax Increment Financing (TIF)to nurture TOD. Metro Cities supports funding Transit Improvement Areas(TIAs)and ensuring that the eligibility criteria encourage a range of improvements and infrastructure and accommodate varying city circumstances and needs. Metro Cities supports expansion of existing tools or development of new funding mechanisms to correct unsuitable soils as well as city authority to redevelop land previously used as landfills and dumps.If a city receives initial approval from a state regulatory authority, a city's redevelopment project approval should be considered final. Local governments and cities may choose to revitalize historic structures rather than construct new buildings. Metro Cities supports extension of the sunset of the state income tax credit and 2023 Legislative Policies 35 Housing & Economic Development maintaining the federal tax credit for preservation of historic properties.Metro Cities supports collection of the state refund for the historic expenditures over one year. Metro Cities supports state funding to allow cities and/or their development authorities to assemble small properties so that business expansion sites will be ready for future redevelopment. 3-K (3)Workforce Readiness A trained workforce is important to a strong local, regional, and state economy. Cities have an interest in the availability of qualified workers and building a future workforce based on current and future demographics,as part of their economic development efforts. Cities can work with the public and private sectors to address workforce readiness to include removing barriers to education access, addressing racial disparities in achievement and employment gaps, addressing the occupational gender gap, and support training and jobs for people with disabilities. The state has a role to prepare and train a qualified workforce through the secondary, vocational, and higher education systems and job training and retraining programs in the Department of Employment and Economic Development(DEED), including youth employment programs. Metro Cities supports: • Increased funding for the Job Skills Partnership,youth employment programs and other workforce training programs administered by the state that lead to jobs that provide a living wage and benefits,support workers of all abilities, and help address racial disparity gaps in employment; • Innovative workforce programs and partnerships that foster workforce readiness for a full range of jobs and careers, including skilled municipal jobs and current high opportunity areas such as manufacturing and construction; • Investments in programs that address the gender wage gap,including training for women to enter nontraditional careers; • A payroll tax credit for job training programs that invest in employees; and • A city's authority to tie workforce requirements to local public finance assistance. 3-L Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Tax Increment Financing(TIF)continues to be the primary tool available for local communities to assist economic development,redevelopment,and housing.Over time,statutory changes have made this critical tool increasingly difficult to use. At the same time, federal and state development and redevelopment resources have been steadily shrinking.The cumulative impact 2023 Legislative Policies 36 Housing & Economic Development of TIF restrictions, shrinking federal and state redevelopment resources and highly restrictive eminent domain laws constrain cities' abilities to address problem properties, which leads to an accelerated level of decline of developed cities in the metropolitan area. Thus,the only source of revenue available to accomplish the scope of redevelopment necessary is the value created by the redevelopment itself, or the "increment." Without the use of the increment, development will either not occur or is unlikely to be optimal. Metro Cities urges the Legislature to: • Not adopt any statutory language that would further constrain or directly or indirectly reduce the effectiveness of TIF; • Not adopt any statutory language that would allow a county,school district or special taxing district to opt out of a TIF district; • Incorporate the Soils Correction District criteria into the Redevelopment District criteria so that a Redevelopment District can be comprised of blighted and contaminated parcels in addition to railroad property; • Expand the flexibility of TIF to support a broader range of redevelopment projects; • Amend MN Statutes to clarify that tax increment pooling limitations are calculated on a cumulative basis; • Increase the ability to pool increments from other districts to support projects; • Continue to monitor the impacts of tax reform on TIF districts and if warranted provide cities with additional authority to pay for possible TIF shortfalls; • Allow for the creation of transit zones and transit-related TIF districts in order to shape development and related improvements around transit stations but not require the use of TIF districts to fund the construction or maintenance of the public transit line itself unless a local community chooses to do so; • Allow TIF eligibility expansion to innovative technological products,recognizing that not only physical items create economic value; • Support changes to TIF law that will facilitate the development of"regional projects"; • Shift TIF redevelopment policy away from a focus on "blight" and "substandard" to "functionally obsolete" or a focus on long range planning for a particular community, reduction in greenhouse gases or other criteria more relevant to current needs; • Encourage DEED to do an extensive cost-benefit analysis related to redevelopment, including an analysis of the various funding mechanisms, and an analysis of where the cost burden falls with each of the options compared to the distribution of the benefits 2023 Legislative Policies 37 Housing & Economic Development of the redevelopment project; • Support TIF for neighborhood recovery efforts in the wake of the foreclosure crisis; • Consider creating an inter-disciplinary TIF team to review local exception TIF proposals, using established criteria, and make recommendations to the legislature on their passage; • Encourage the State Auditor to continue to work toward a more efficient and streamlined reporting process. There are an increasing number of noncompliance notices that have overturned longstanding practices or limited statutorily defined terms. The Legislature has not granted TIF rulemaking authority to the State Auditor and the audit powers granted by statute are not an appropriate vehicle for making administrative or legislative changes to TIF statutes. If the State Auditor is to exercise rulemaking authority, the administrative power to do so must be granted explicitly by the Legislature. The audit enforcement process does not create a level playing field for cities to challenge the Auditor's interpretation of statutes. The Legislature should provide a process through which to resolve disputes over TIF policy that is fair to all parties; • Clarify the use of TIF when a sale occurs after the closing of a district; • Revise the substandard building test to simplify,resolve ambiguities and reduce continued threat of litigation; and • Amend TIF statutes to address,through extending districts or other mechanisms, shortfalls related to declining market values. • Metro Cities supports statutory modifications to TIF statutes to provide temporary flexibility for municipalities in the use of unobligated TIF increment as cities address local revenue challenges resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. Metro Cities opposes changes to TIF laws that would mandate the forgiveness of loans by a TIF authority to a business. 3-M Eminent Domain Significant statutory restrictions on the use of eminent domain have resulted in higher public costs for traditional public use projects like streets,parks,and sewers,and have all but restricted the use of eminent domain for redevelopment to cases of extreme blight or contamination. The proper operation and long-term economic vitality of our cities is dependent on the ability of a city, its citizens, and its businesses to continually reinvest and reinvent. Reinvestment and reinvention strategies can occasionally conflict with the priorities of individual residents or business owners. Eminent domain is a critical tool in the reinvestment and reinvention process and without it our cities may deteriorate to unprecedented levels before the public reacts. Metro Cities strongly encourages the Governor and Legislature to revisit eminent domain laws to allow local governments to address redevelopment problems before those conditions become 2023 Legislative Policies 38 Housing & Economic Development financially impossible to address. Specifically,Metro Cities supports: • Clarifying contamination standards; • Developing different standards for redevelopment to include obsolete structures or to reflect the deterioration conditions that currently exist in the metropolitan area; • Allowing for the assembly of multiple parcels for redevelopment projects; • Modifying the public purpose definition under Minn. Stat. § 117 to allow cities to more expediently address properties that are vacant or abandoned in areas with high levels of foreclosures, as well as address neighborhood stabilization and recovery; • Providing the ability to acquire land from "holdouts" who will now view a publicly funded project as an opportunity for personal gain at taxpayer expense;i.e.allow for negotiation using balanced appraisals for fair relocation costs; • Examining attorney fees and limit fees for attorneys representing a property owner; • Allowing for relocation costs not to be paid if the city and property owner agree to a sale contract; • A property owner's appraisal to be shared with the city prior to a sale agreement; and • Appropriately balanced awards of attorney fees and costs of litigation with the outcome of the eminent domain proceeding. 3-N Community Reinvestment Communities across the metropolitan region have aging residential and commercial structures that need repair and reinvestment. Reinvestment prevents neighborhoods from falling into disrepair, revitalizes communities and protects a city's tax base. Metro Cities supports state programs and incentives for reinvestment in older residential and commercial/industrial buildings, such as, but not limited to, tax credits and/or property tax deferrals. Historically, the state has funded programs to promote reinvestment in communities, including the "This Old House"program, that allowed owners of older homestead property to defer an increase in their tax capacity resulting from repairs or improvements to the home and"This Old Shop"for owners of older commercial/industrial property that make improvements that increase the property's market value. 2023 Legislative Policies 39 Housing & Economic Development 3-0 Business Incentives Policy Without a thorough study, the Legislature should not make any substantive changes to the Business Subsidy Act,as defined in Minn. Stat. § 116J.993,but should look to technical changes that would streamline both state and local processes and procedures. The Legislature should distinguish between development incentives and redevelopment activities.In addition,in order to ensure cohesive and comprehensive regulations, the legislature should limit regulation of business incentives to the Business Subsidy Act. Metro Cities supports additional legislation that includes tools to help enhance and facilitate economic development and job creation. Metro Cities supports increased flexibility for meeting business subsidy agreements during a state of emergency. 3-P Broadband Technology Where many traditional economic development tools have focused on managing the costs and availability of traditional infrastructure—roads, rail, and utilities—the 21 St century economy is dependent on reliable,cost effective,high bandwidth communications capabilities.This includes voice, video, data, and other services delivered over cable, telephone, fiber-optic, wireless, and other platforms. The state has increased its role in expanding broadband infrastructure across the state by funding broadband access for residents and businesses. The Governor's Broadband Task Force regularly recommends updates to state broadband speed goals and funding levels to expand statewide broadband access. The Office of Broadband Development in the Department of Employment and Economic Development(DEED) supports the role of broadband in economic development. The Office coordinates broadband mapping and administers state broadband grant funds. Cities play a vital role in achieving significantly higher broadband speeds. Local units of government are contributing to increasing broadband capacity and ensuring interne connectivity, reliability, and availability. However, attempts have been made in Minnesota and other states to restrict or stop cities from facilitating the deployment of broadband services or forming partnerships with private sector companies to provide broadband services to unserved or underserved residents or businesses. Restricting municipal authority is contrary to existing state law on electric utility service, telecommunications, and economic development. Metro Cities opposes the adoption of state policies that further restrict a city's ability to finance, construct or operate broadband telecommunications networks. Metro Cities supports: • State policies and support programs that substantially increase speed and capacity of broadband services statewide, including facilitating solutions at the local level. The state should offer incentives to private sector service providers to respond to local or regional needs and to collaborate with cities and other public entities to deploy broadband infrastructure capable of delivering sufficient bandwidth and capacity to meet immediate and future local needs as well as policies which seek to position Minnesota as a state of choice for testing next-generation broadband; 2023 Legislative Policies 40 Housing & Economic Development • Metro eligibility for broadband funds,including increased capacity for areas with existing levels of service; • Testing and review of street-level broadband speeds and updating of comprehensive statewide street-level mapping of broadband services to identify underserved areas and connectivity issues. • Programs and projects that improve broadband adoption,achieve significantly higher broadband speeds, and support efforts to improve digital inclusion by ensuring that robust and affordable Internet connectivity is widely available to all Minnesotans. • Municipal authority and encouragement of local governments to play a direct role in providing broadband service. This includes repealing Minn. Stat. § 237.19. The state should clarify that cities have the authority to partner with private entities to finance broadband infrastructure using city bonding authority; • Local authority to manage and protect public rights-of-way including public and private infrastructure,to zone,to collect compensation for the use of public assets,or to work cooperatively with and respond to applications from the private sector. Cities may exercise local authority over zoning and land-use decisions for siting,upgrading,or altering wireless service facilities and exercise regulations of structures in the public right-of-way; and • Public-private collaborations that support broadband infrastructure and services at the local and regional level, including partnerships and cooperation in providing last-mile connections. 3-Q City Role in Environmental Protection and Sustainable Development Historically, cities have played a major role in environmental protection,particularly in water quality. Through the construction and operation of wastewater treatment and storm water management systems, cities are a leader in protecting the surface water of the state. In recent years, increased emphasis has been placed on protecting ground water and removing impairments from storm water. In addition,there is increased emphasis on city participation in controlling our carbon footprint and in promoting green development. Metro Cities supports public and private environmental protection efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and to further protect surface and ground water.Metro Cities also supports "green" design and construction techniques to the extent that those techniques have been thoroughly tested and are truly environmentally beneficial, economically sustainable and represent sound building practices.Metro Cities supports additional, feasible environmental protection with adequate funding and incentives to comply.Metro Cities supports state funding for municipal renewable energy objectives. Green jobs represent employment and entrepreneurial opportunities that are part of the green economy, as defined in Minn. Stat. § 116J.437, including the four industry sectors of green 2023 Legislative Policies 41 Housing & Economic Development products,renewable energy, green services and environmental conservation. Minnesota's green jobs policies, strategies and investments need to lead to high quality jobs with good wages and benefits, meeting current wage and labor laws. 3-R Impaired Waters Local units of government should not bear undue cost burdens associated with completed TMDL reports. As recent Total Maximum Daily Load(TMDL)reports show, non-point agricultural sources are producing more runoff pollution than urban areas at a rate of 13:1. Cities must not be required as primary entities for funding the clean-up and protection of state and regional water resources. Benefits of efforts must be proportional to the costs incurred and agricultural sources must be held responsible for their share of costs. Metro Cities supports continued development of the metropolitan area in a manner that is responsive to the market but is cognizant of the need to protect the water resources of the state and metropolitan area. Since all types of properties are required to pay storm water fees,Metro Cities opposes entity-specific exemptions from these fees. Metro Cities supports the goals of the Clean Water Act and efforts at both the federal and state level to implement it. Metro Cities supports continued funding of the framework established to improve the region's ability to respond to market demands for development and redevelopment, including dedicated funding for surface water impairment assessments, TMDL development, storm water construction grants and wastewater construction grants. 2023 Legislative Policies 42 Metropolitan_Agencies 4-A Goals and Principles for Regional Governance The Twin Cities metropolitan region is home to a majority of the state's population and businesses and is poised for significant growth in the next two decades. The region faces both significant challenges and opportunities, the responses to which will determine the future success of the metropolitan region and its competitiveness in the state, national and world economies. The Metropolitan Council was created to manage the growth of the metropolitan region, and cities are responsible for adhering to regional plans as they plan for local growth and service delivery. The region's cities are the Metropolitan Council's primary constituency,with regional and local growth being primarily managed through city comprehensive planning and implementation and the delivery of public services. To function successfully, the Metropolitan Council must be accountable to and work in collaboration with city governments. The role of the Metropolitan Council is to set broad regional goals and to provide cities with technical assistance and incentives to achieve these goals. City governments are responsible and best suited to provide local zoning, land use planning,development, and service delivery. Any additional roles or responsibilities for the Metropolitan Council should be limited to specific statutory assignments or grants or authorization and should not usurp or conflict with local roles or processes unless such changes have the consent of the region's cities. Metro Cities supports an economically strong and vibrant region, and the effective, efficient, and equitable provision of regional infrastructure, services, and planning throughout the metropolitan area. Metro Cities supports the provision of approved regional systems and planning that can be provided more effectively, efficiently, or equitably on a regional level than at the local level by individual local units of government. The Metropolitan Council must involve cities in the delivery of regional services and planning and be responsive to local perspectives on regional issues and be required to provide opportunities for city participation on Council advisory committees and task forces. The Metropolitan Council must involve cities at all steps of planning, review and implementation of the regional development guide,policy plans, systems statements,and local comprehensive plan requirements to ensure transparency,balance and Council adherence to its core mission and functions. These processes should allow for stakeholder input before policies and plans are released for comment and finalized.Any additional functions for the Metropolitan Council should not be undertaken unless authorized specifically by state law. 4-B Regional Governance Structure Metro Cities supports the appointment of Metropolitan Council members by the Governor with four-year,staggered terms for members to stabilize ideological shifts and provide for continuity of knowledge on the Council,which is appropriate for a long-range planning body. The appointment of the Metropolitan Council Chair should coincide with the term of the Governor. Metro Cities supports a nominating committee process that maximizes participation and 43 2023 Legislative Policies Metropolitan Agencies input by local officials. Metro Cities supports expanding the nominating committee from seven to 13 members,with a majority of a 13-member committee being local elected officials. Of the local officials appointed to a nominating committee,two thirds should be elected city officials, appointed by Metro Cities. Consideration should be given to the creation of four separate nominating committees,with committee representation from each quadrant of the region. Metro Cities supports having the names of recommended nominees or other individuals under consideration for appointment to the Council by the Governor to be made public at least 21 days prior to final selection by the Governor, and a formal public comment period before members are appointed to the Council. Metro Cities supports the appointment of Metropolitan Council members who have demonstrated the ability to work with cities in a collaborative manner, commit to meet with local government officials regularly and who are responsive to the circumstances and concerns of cities in the district that they represent on the Council.Council members should understand the diversity and the commonalities of the region, and the long-term implications of regional decision-making. A detailed position description outlining the required skills, time commitment and understanding of regional and local issues and concerns should be clearly articulated and posted in advance of the call for nominees. Metro Cities supports opportunities for local officials to provide input during the decennial legislative redistricting process for the Metropolitan Council and supports transparency in the redistricting process. 4-C Comprehensive Analysis and Oversight of Metropolitan Council A comprehensive analysis of the Metropolitan Council's functions and structure was conducted by a Governor's Blue-Ribbon Committee in 2020. Metro Cities supports specific findings by the committee that recommend four-year staggered terms for Metropolitan Council members with members appointed by the governor, an expanded nominating committee with a majority of local officials on the committee, and the publication of nominees prior to their appointment. These findings are consistent with Metro Cities' legislative policy on regional governance.The metropolitan region will continue to expand while simultaneously facing significant challenges for the effective, efficient, and equitable provision of resources and infrastructure. Metro Cities supports an objective study of the Metropolitan Council's activities and services as well as its geographical jurisdiction to ensure that the Metropolitan Council's services are positioned to be effective and adequate in addressing the future needs of the region.Such work must include the participation of local officials. The Metropolitan Council should also examine its scope of services to determine their benefit and efficiency and be open to alternative methods of delivery to assure that services are provided at high levels of effectiveness for the region. Metro Cities supports appropriate legislative oversight of the Metropolitan Council to regularly review the Council's activities, and to provide transparency and accountability of its functions and operations. 44 2023 Legislative Policies Metropolitan Agencies 4-D Funding Regional Services The Metropolitan Council should continue to fund regional services and activities through a combination of user fees, property taxes, and state and federal grants. The Council should set user fees through an open process that includes public notices and public hearings. User fees should be uniform by type of user and set at a level that supports effective and efficient public services based on commonly accepted industry standards and allows for sufficient reserves to ensure long-term service and fee stability. Fee proceeds should be used to fund regional services or programs for which they are collected. Metro Cities supports the use of property taxes and user fees to fund regional projects so long as the benefit conferred on the region is proportional to the fee or tax, and the fee or tax is comparable to the benefit cities receive in return. 4-E Regional Systems Regional systems are statutorily defined as transportation, aviation,wastewater treatment and recreational open space. The purpose of the regional systems and the Metropolitan Council's authority over them is clearly outlined in state law. The Metropolitan Council must seek a statutory change to alter the focus or expand the reach of any of these systems. Systems plans prepared by the Metropolitan Council should be specific in terms of size,location, and timing of regional investments to allow for consideration in local comprehensive planning. Systems plans should also clearly state the criteria by which local plans will be judged for consistency with regional systems. Additional regional systems should be established only if there is a compelling metropolitan problem or concern best addressed through the designation. Common characteristics of the existing regional systems include public ownership of the system and its components and established regional or state funding sources. These characteristics should be present in any new regional system that might be established. Water supply and housing do not meet necessary established criteria for regional systems. Any proposed additional system must have an established regional or state funding source. 4-F Regional Water Supply Planning The Metropolitan Council is statutorily authorized to carry out planning activities to address water supply needs of the metropolitan area. A Metropolitan Area Water Supply Advisory Committee (MAWSAC)that includes state agency representatives and local officials was established to assist the Council in developing a master water supply plan that includes recommendations for clarifying the roles of local,regional,and state governments,streamlining and consolidating approval processes and recommending future planning and capital investments.The Master Water Supply Plan serves as a framework for assisting communities in water supply planning, without usurping local decision-making processes. Many cities also conduct their own analyses for use in water supply planning. As the Metropolitan Council continues its assessment of the metropolitan region's water supply and water sustainability, it must work cooperatively with local policymakers and local professional staff on an on-going structured basis to ensure a base of information for water supply decision-making that is sound,credible and verifiable, and considers local information, data, cost-benefit analyses and projections before any policy recommendations are issued. 45 2023 Legislative Policies Metropolitan Agencies Metro Cities encourages the Metropolitan Council to consider the inter-relationships of wastewater treatment, storm water management and water supply. Any state and regional regulations and processes should be clearly stated in the Master Water Supply Plan. Further, regional monitoring and data collection benefits should be borne as shared expenses between the regional and local units of government. Metro Cities supports Metropolitan Council planning activities to address regional water supply needs and water planning activities as prescribed in statute. Metro Cities opposes the insertion of the Metropolitan Council as another regulator in the water supply arena. Further,while Metro Cities supports regionally coordinated efforts to address water supply issues in the metropolitan area,Metro Cities opposes the elevation of water supply to "Regional System" status, or the assumption of Metropolitan Council control and management of municipal water supply infrastructure. Metro Cities supports the technical advisory committee to the MAWSAC that maximizes participation by municipal officials and helps to ensure sound scientific analyses and models are developed with local expertise and input before legislative solutions are considered. Metro Cities supports efforts to identify capital funding sources to assist with municipal water supply projects.Any fees or taxes for regional water supply planning activities must be consistent with activities prescribed in Minn. Stat. § 473. 1565, and support activities specifically within the metropolitan region. 4-G Review of Local Comprehensive Plans Local officials identified concerns with the submission and review processes for 2018 local plans including requests for information beyond what should be necessary for the Metropolitan Council to review local plans for consistency with regional systems,regional requirements that evolved as local plans were prepared and finalized and finding plans to be incomplete or requiring detailed information on items of a local rather than regional nature, among others. The Metropolitan Council must work with Metro Cities and local officials to address challenges and concerns identified with the 2018 comprehensive planning process and undertake any necessary improvements in advance of the next comprehensive planning cycle. This work should be conducted with opportunities for ongoing input and consultation with local officials as any modifications to the comprehensive planning review processes are considered, including but not limited to a recently established regional planning advisory group that includes Metro Cities and municipal officials. This work shall include reviewing processes for comprehensive plan amendments and identifying areas for improvement. In reviewing local comprehensive plans and plan amendments,the Metropolitan Council should: • Recognize that its role is to review and comment,unless it is found that the local plan is more likely than not to have a substantial impact on or contain a substantial departure from one of the four system plans; • Be aware of statutory time constraints imposed by the Legislature on plan amendments and development applications; • Provide for immediate effectuation of plan amendments that have no potential for substantial impact on systems plans; 46 2023 Legislative Policies Metropolitan Agencies • Require the information needed for the Metropolitan Council to complete its review,but not prescribe additional content or format beyond that which is required by the Metropolitan Land Use Planning Act(LUPA); • Work in a cooperative and timely manner toward the resolution of outstanding issues.When a city's local comprehensive plan is deemed incompatible with the Metropolitan Council's systems plans,Metro Cities supports a formal appeal process that includes a peer review. Metro Cities opposes the imposition of sanctions or monetary penalties when a city's local comprehensive plan is deemed incompatible with the Metropolitan Council's systems plans or the plan fails to meet a statutory deadline when the city has made legitimate, good faith efforts to meet Metropolitan Council requirements; • Work with affected cities and other organizations such as the Pollution Control Agency, Department of Natural Resources,Department of Health and other stakeholders to identify common ground and resolve conflicts between respective goals for flexible residential development and achieving consistency with the Council's system plans and policies;and • Require entities, such as private businesses, nonprofits, or local units of government, among others,whose actions could adversely affect a comprehensive plan,to be subject to the same qualifications and/or regulations as the city. 4-H Comprehensive Planning Process Metro Cities supports examining the comprehensive planning process to make sure that the process is streamlined and efficient and avoids excessive cost burdens or duplicative or unnecessary planning requirements by municipalities in the planning process.Metro Cities supports resources to assist cities in meeting regional goals as part of the comprehensive planning process,including planning grants and technical assistance. Metro Cities supports funding and other resources from the Metropolitan Council for the preparation of comprehensive plan updates,including grant funding. Grants and other resources should be provided to all eligible communities through a formula that is equitable,and recognizes varying city needs and capacities. 4-I Comprehensive Planning Schedule Cities are required to submit comprehensive plan updates to the Metropolitan Council every 10 years.A city's comprehensive plan represents a community's vision of how the city should grow and develop or redevelop, ensure adequate housing, provide essential public infrastructure and services, protect natural areas and meet other community objectives. Metro Cities recognizes the merit of aligning comprehensive plan timelines with the release of census data. However,the comprehensive plan process is expensive,time consuming and labor intensive for cities, and the timing for the submission of comprehensive plans should not be altered solely to better align with census data. If sufficient valid reasons exist for the schedule for the next round of comprehensive plans to be changed or expedited, cities should be provided with financial resources to assist them in preparing the next round of plans. Metro Cities opposes cities being forced into a state of perpetual planning because of regional and legislative actions. Should changes be made to the comprehensive planning schedule,Metro Cities supports financial and other resources to assist cities in preparing 47 2023 Legislative Policies Metropolitan Agencies and incorporating policy changes in local planning efforts. Metro Cities supports a 10-year time frame for comprehensive plan update submissions. Metro Cities supports the Metropolitan Council's consideration to reduce requirements for 10-year Comprehensive Plan updates for cities under 2,500 residents. 4-J Local Zoning Authority Local governments are responsible for zoning and local officials should have full authority to approve variances to remain flexible in response to the unique land use needs of their own community.Local zoning decisions,and the implementation of cities'comprehensive plans, should not be conditioned upon the approval of the Metropolitan Council or any other governmental agency. Metro Cities supports local authority over land use and zoning decisions and opposes the creation of non-local appeals boards with the authority to supersede city zoning decisions, and statutory modifications that would diminish the ability of cities to set and implement local zoning ordinances and policies. 4-K Regional Growth The most recent regional population forecast prepared by the Metropolitan Council projects a population of 3,746,000 people by 2040 and 4,001,000 by 2050. Metro Cities recognizes cities' responsibility to plan for sustainable growth patterns that integrate transportation,housing,parks,open space, and economic development that will result in a region better equipped to manage population growth, to provide a high quality of life for a growing and increasingly diverse metropolitan area population and improved environmental health. In developing local comprehensive plans to fit within a regional framework,adequate state and regional fmancial resources and incentives and maximum flexibility for local planning decisions are imperative. The regional framework should assist cities in managing growth while being responsive to the individual qualities, characteristics and needs of metropolitan cities, and should encourage sub-regional cooperation and coordination. In order to accommodate this growth in a manner that preserves the region's high quality of life: • Natural resource protection will have to be balanced with growth and development/reinvestment; • Significant new resources will have to be provided for transportation and transit;and • New households will have to be incorporated into the core cities,first and second-ring suburbs, and developing cities through both development and redevelopment. In order for regional and local planning to result in the successful implementation of regional policies: • The State of Minnesota must contribute additional financial resources,particularly in the 48 2023 Legislative Policies Metropolitan Agencies areas of transportation and transit, community reinvestment, affordable housing development, and the preservation of parks and open space. If funding for regional infrastructure is not adequate,cities should not be responsible for meeting the growth forecast set forth by the Metropolitan Council; • The Metropolitan Council and Legislature must work to pursue levels of state and federal transportation funding that are adequate to meet identified transportation and transit needs in the metropolitan area; • The Metropolitan Council must recognize the limitations of its authority and continue to work with cities in a collaborative, incentives-based manner; • The Metropolitan Council must recognize the various needs and capacities of its many partners,including but not limited to cities, counties, economic development authorities and nonprofit organizations, and its policies must be balanced and flexible in their approach; • Metropolitan counties, adjacent counties and school districts must be brought more thoroughly into the discussion due to the critical importance of facilities and services such as county roads and public schools in accommodating forecasted growth; and • Greater recognition must be given to the fact that the "true"metropolitan region extends beyond the traditional seven-county area and the need to work collaboratively with adjacent counties in Minnesota and Wisconsin,and the cities within those counties.The region faces environmental,transportation,and land use issues that cannot be solved by the seven-county metro area alone. Metro Cities supports an analysis to determine the impacts of Metropolitan Council's growth management policies and infrastructure investments on the growth and development of the collar counties, and the impacts of growth in the collar counties on the metropolitan area. Metro Cities opposes statutory or other regulatory changes that interfere with established regional and local processes to manage growth in the metropolitan region, including regional systems plans,systems statements, and local comprehensive plans. Such changes erode local planning authority as well as the efficient provision of regional infrastructure, disregard established public processes and create different guidelines for communities that may result in financial, environmental and other impacts on surrounding communities. 4-L Natural Resource Protection Metro Cities recognizes the Metropolitan Council's efforts to compile and maintain an inventory and assessment of regionally significant natural resources for providing local communities with additional information and technical assistance. The state and region play significant roles in the protection of natural resources. Any steps taken by the state or Metropolitan Council regarding the protection of natural resources must recognize that: • The protection of natural resources is significant to a multi-county area that is home to more than 50 percent of the state's population and a travel destination for many more. Given the limited availability of resources and the artificial nature of the metropolitan area's borders, and the numerous entities that are involved in protecting the natural resources of the region and state, neither the region nor individual metropolitan communities would be well served by assuming primary responsibility for financing and protecting these resources; • The completion of local Natural Resource Inventories and Assessments(NRI/A)is not a 49 2023 Legislative Policies Metropolitan Agencies regional system nor is it a required component of local comprehensive plans under the Metropolitan Land Use Planning Act; • The protection of natural resources should be balanced with the need to accommodate growth and development, reinvest in established communities, encourage more affordable housing and provide transportation and transit connections; and • Decisions about the zoning or land use designations, either within or outside a public park, nature preserve, or other protected area are, and should remain, the responsibility of local units of government. The Metropolitan Council's role with respect to climate change, as identified in the 2040 regional development guide, should be focused on the stewardship of its internal operations (wastewater,transit)and working collaboratively with local governments to provide information, best practices, technical assistance and incentives around responses to climate change. Metro Cities urges the Legislature and the Metropolitan Council to provide financial assistance for the preservation of regionally significant natural resources. 4-M Inflow and Infiltration (I/I) The Metropolitan Council has identified a majority of sewered communities in the metropolitan region to be contributing excessive inflow and infiltration(I/I) into the regional wastewater system or to be on the threshold of contributing excessive inflow and infiltration. Inflow and infiltration are terms for the ways that clear water(ground and storm)makes its way into sanitary sewer pipes and gets treated, unnecessarily, at regional wastewater plants. The number of identified communities is subject to change, depending on rain events, and any city in the metropolitan area can be affected. The Metropolitan Council establishes a surcharge on cities determined to be contributing unacceptable amounts of I/I into the wastewater system.The charge is waived when cities meet certain parameters through local mitigation efforts. Metro Cities recognizes the importance of controlling I/I because of its potential environmental and public health impacts, because it affects the size, and therefore the cost, of wastewater treatment systems and because excessive I/I in one city can affect development capacity of another.However,there is the potential for cities to incur increasingly exorbitant costs in their ongoing efforts to mitigate excessive H. Therefore,managing I/I at a regional as well as local level, is critical to effective mitigation and cost management. Metro Cities continues to monitor the surcharge program and supports continued reviews of the methodology used to measure excess I/I to ensure that the methodology appropriately normalizes for precipitation variability and the Council's work with cities on community specific issues around I/I. Metro Cities supports state financial assistance for metro area I/I mitigation through future Clean Water Legacy Act appropriations or similar legislation and encourages the Metropolitan Council to partner in support of such appropriations. Metro Cities also supports resources, including identified best practices,information on model ordinances, public education and outreach, and other tools,to local governments to address inflow/ infiltration mitigation for private properties. Metro Cities recognizes recommendations made by a 2016 Inflow/Infiltration Task Force that 50 2023 Legislative Policies Metropolitan Agencies support considering the use of a portion of the regional wastewater charge for private property inflow/infiltration mitigation. Any proposal to utilize the wastewater fee for this purpose must include the opportunity for local officials to review and comment on specific proposals. Metro Cities supports continued state capital assistance to provide grants to metropolitan cities for mitigating inflow and infiltration problems into municipal wastewater collection systems. 4-N Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) Metro Cities supports a SAC program that emphasizes equity,transparency,simplification, and lower rates. Metro Cities supports principles for SAC that include program transparency and simplicity, equity for all served communities and between current and future users, support for cities'sewer fee capacities,administrative reasonableness,and weighing any program uses for specific goals with the impacts to the program's equity,transparency, and simplicity.As such,Metro Cities opposes the use of the SAC mechanism to subsidize and/or incent specific Metropolitan Council goals and objectives. Input from local officials should be sought if the SAC reserve is proposed to be used for any purpose other than debt service, including pay-as-you-go(PAYGO).Metro Cities opposes increases to the SAC rate while the reserve is projected to exceed the Metropolitan Council's minimum reserve balance, without the express engagement of city officials in the metropolitan area. Metro Cities supports modifications that were recommended by local and business officials and adopted by the Metropolitan Council in 2018 to use gross rather than net square feet in making SAC determinations, to combine use categories, to adjust the grandfather credit date and to not require a new SAC determination for business remodels that do not change the use of the property. These changes were intended to simplify the SAC program for users, and to reduce incidents of"surprise" SAC charges. Metro Cities supports current SAC policy that enhances flexibility in the SAC credit structure for redevelopment purposes and supports continued evaluation of SAC fees to determine if they hinder redevelopment. Metro Cities supports the Metropolitan Council providing details on how any proposed changes to the SAC rate are determined. Metro Cities supports a periodic review of MCES' customer service policies, to ensure that its processes are responsive and transparent to communities,businesses,and residents.Metro Cities supports continued outreach by MCES to users of the SAC program to promote knowledge and understanding of SAC charges and policies. Any modifications to the SAC program or structure should be considered only with the participation and input of local officials in the metropolitan region. Metro Cities supports a "growth pays for growth" approach to SAC. If state statutes are modified to establish a"growth pays for growth"method for SAC,the Metropolitan Council should convene a group of local officials to identify any technical changes necessary for implementing the new structure. Metro Cities supports allowing the Council to utilize a SAC `transfer'mechanism when the SAC reserve fund is inadequate to meet debt service obligations. Any use of the transfer mechanism must be done so within parameters prescribed by state law and with appropriate 51 2023 Legislative Policies Metropolitan Agencies notification and processes to allow local official input and should include a timely`shift back'of any funds that were transferred from the wastewater fund to the SAC reserve fund. Efforts should be made to avoid increasing the municipal wastewater charge in use of the transfer mechanism. 4-0 Funding Regional Parks & Open Space In the seven-county metropolitan area,regional parks essentially serve as state parks, and the state should continue to provide capital funding for the acquisition,development, and improvement of these parks in a manner that is equitable with funding for state parks. State funding apart from Legacy funds should equal 40 percent of the operating budget for regional parks. Legacy funds for parks and trails should be balanced between the metropolitan region and greater Minnesota. Metro Cities supports state funding for regional parks and trails that is fair, creates a balance of investment across the state, and meets the needs of the region. 4-P Livable Communities The Livable Communities Act(LCA)under Minn.Stat. 473.25 is administered by the Metropolitan Council and provides a voluntary,incentive-based approach to affordable housing development, tax base revitalization,job growth and preservation,brownfield clean up and mixed-use,transit-friendly development,and redevelopment.Metro Cities strongly supports the continuation of this approach,which is widely accepted and utilized by cities. Since its inception in 1995 the LCA program has generated billions of dollars of private and public investment, created thousands of jobs and added thousands of affordable housing units in the region. Metro Cities monitors the LCA programs on an ongoing basis and supports any necessary program modifications to ensure that the LCA program criteria are flexible and promote the participation of all participating communities,and to ensure all metropolitan area cities are eligible to participate in the Livable Communities Demonstration Account(LCDA). Metro Cities supports increased funding and flexible eligibility requirements in the LCDA to assist cities with development that may not be exclusively market driven or market proven in the location, in order to support important local development and redevelopment goals. Metro Cities supports the findings of a recent local official working group that identified the need for the Metropolitan Council to expand its outreach to cities on the LCA programs and to continue efforts to ensure that LCA criteria are sufficiently flexible to meet the range of identified program objectives. These efforts should include ongoing opportunities for structured input by Metro Cities and local officials. Metro Cities supports the statutory goals and criteria established for the Livable Communities Act and opposes any changes to LCA programs that constrain flexibility in statutory goals or program requirements and criteria. Metro Cities is monitoring 2021 modifications to the LCA program to ensure that program criteria are responsive to local needs within the context of overall LCA objectives. Metro Cities opposes funding reductions to the Livable Communities Act programs and the transfer or use of these funds for purposes outside of the LCA program. Metro Cities supports statutory modifications in the LCDA to reflect the linkages among 52 2023 Legislative Policies Metropolitan Agencies the goals, municipal objectives, and Metropolitan Council system objectives. Metro Cities supports the use of LCA funds for projects in transit improvement areas,as defined in statute, if funding levels for general LCA programs are adequate to meet program goals and the program remains accessible to participating communities. Any proposed program modifications should be considered with input by local officials before changes to LCA programs are enacted or implemented.Use of interest earnings from LCA funds should be limited to covering administrative program costs. Remaining interest earnings should be considered part of LCA funds and used to fund grants from established LCA accounts per established funding criteria. 4-Q Density Metro Cities recognizes the need for a density policy,including minimum density requirements, that allows the Metropolitan Council to effectively plan for and deliver cost-efficient regional infrastructure and services.Regional density requirements must recognize that local decisions, needs and priorities vary, and that requirements must be sufficiently flexible to accommodate local circumstances as well as the effect of market trends on local development and redevelopment activity. The Metropolitan Council asks cities to plan for achieving minimum average net densities across all areas identified for new growth,development,or redevelopment.Because each community is different, how and where density is guided is determined by the local unit of government, regional density requirements should use minimum average net densities and provide flexibility to accommodate individual city circumstances. Metro Cities opposes parcel-specific density requirements as such requirements are contrary to the need for local flexibility in a regional policy. Any regional density policy must use local data and local development patterns and must accommodate local physical and land use constraints such as,but not limited to,wetlands,public open space, trees, water bodies and rights-of-way, and any corresponding federal and state regulations imposed on local governments when computing net densities. The Metropolitan Council must coordinate with local governments in establishing or revising regional density requirements and should ensure that regional density and plat monitoring reports comprehensively reflect local densities and land uses. 2023 Legislative Policies 53 Transportation Transportation Policies and Funding Introduction Metro Cities supports a comprehensive transportation system as a vital component in planning for and meeting the physical, social, and economic needs of the state and metropolitan region. A comprehensive transportation system includes streets and bridges,transit,and multi-modal solutions that work cohesively to best meet state, regional and local transportation needs. Adequate and stable sources of funding are necessary to ensure the development and maintenance of a high quality,efficient and safe transportation system that meets these needs and that will position the state and region to be economically competitive in the years ahead. Failure to maintain a functional transportation system will have adverse effects on the state's ability to attract and retain businesses and create jobs. Transportation funding and planning must be a high priority for state,regional and local policymakers so that the transportation system can meet the needs of the state's residents and businesses as well as projected population growth. Funding and planning for regional and statewide systems must be coordinated at the federal, state,regional and local levels to optimally achieve long-term needs and goals. 5-A Road and Bridge Funding Under current financing structures that rely primarily on local property taxes and fees as well as the motor vehicle sales tax(MVST)receipts, road and bridge needs in the metropolitan region continue to be underfunded. Metro Cities strongly supports stable, sufficient, and sustainable statewide transportation funding and expanded local tools to meet the transportation system needs of the region and local municipal systems. Consideration should be given to using new, expanded, and existing resources to meet these needs. Metro Cities supports the use of dedicated taxes and fees to fund transportation infrastructure. In addition, cities lack adequate tools and resources for the maintenance and improvement of municipal street systems,with resources restricted to property taxes and special assessments. It is imperative that alternative revenue generating authority be granted to municipalities and that state resources be made available for this purpose to aid local communities and relieve the burden on the property tax system. Metro Cities supports Municipal State Aid Street(MSAS) funding.MSAS provides an important but limited revenue source that assists eligible cities with street infrastructure needs and is limited to twenty percent of a city's street system. Metro Cities supports state funding to assist cities over-burdened by cost participation responsibilities from improvement projects on the state's arterial system and county state aid highway (CSAH) systems. Metro Cities supports state funding for state highway projects,including congestion, bottleneck and safety improvements.Metro Cities also supports state financial assistance, as well as innovations in design and construction,to offset the impacts of regional transportation construction projects on businesses. 54 2023 Legislative Policies Transportation Metro Cities opposes statutory changes restricting the use of local funds for transportation projects.Metro Cities opposes restrictions on aesthetic related components of transportation projects, as these components often provide important safety and other benefits to projects. Metro Cities supports further research into the policy implications for electric and automated vehicles on roadways,transit, and other components of transportation systems. Metro Cities encourages the state to study the impact of electric and automated vehicles on transportation related funding and policies. 5-B Regional Transit System The Twin Cities Metropolitan Area needs a multi-modal regional transit system as part of a comprehensive transportation strategy that serves all users, including commuters and the transit dependent. The transit system should be composed of a mix of high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes, high occupancy toll (HOT) lanes, a network of bike and pedestrian trails, bus rapid transit, express and regular route bus service, exclusive transit ways, light rail transit, streetcars, and commuter rail corridors designed to connect residential, employment, retail, and entertainment centers. The system should be regularly monitored and adjusted to ensure that routes of service correspond to current and forecasted changes in the region's transit service needs and priorities. Metro Cities supports strategic expansion of the regional transit system. Current congestion levels and forecasted population growth require a stable, reliable, and growing source of revenue for transit construction and operations so that our metropolitan region can meet its transportation needs to remain economically competitive. Metro Cities supports an effective, efficient, and comprehensive regional transit system as an invaluable component in meeting the multimodal transportation needs of the metropolitan region and to the region's economic vibrancy and quality of life. Metro Cities recognizes that transit service connects residents to jobs, schools, health care, and activity centers. Transit access and service frequency levels should recognize the role of public transit in addressing equity, including but not limited to racial and economic disparities,people with disabilities and the elderly. Metro Cities supports efforts to transition the fleets of transit providers in the metropolitan region to low or zero emission buses and supports using equity and environmental criteria identified in transit providers'zero emission bus transition plans to prioritize the deployment of zero or low-emission buses. Metro Cities supports a regional governance structure that ensures a measurably reliable and efficient system, recognizes the diverse transit needs of our region and addresses funding needs for all components of the system. These structures must work with and be responsive to the needs of the communities they serve. 2023 Legislative Policies 55 Transportation Metro Cities supports an open and collaborative regional transportation planning process that fully engages all public transit providers as partners in ongoing policy development to achieve desired outcomes,including establishment of transit project criteria that promote fair and equitable selection of projects throughout the region and transparent regional distribution of available funding. Metro Cities recognizes the need for flexibility in transit systems for cities that border the edges of the seven-county metropolitan area to ensure users can get to destinations outside of the seven-county area.Metro Cities encourages the Metropolitan Council to coordinate with collar counties so that riders can get to and from destinations beyond the boundaries of the region. Metro Cities opposes statutory changes restricting the use of local funds for planning or construction of transit projects. Restricting local planning and funding limits the ability of cities to participate in transit corridor planning and development. State and regional policymakers must coordinate with local units of government as decisions are made at the state level on transit projects that also involve municipal planning, funding, and policy decisions. Metro Cities is opposed to legislative or Metropolitan Council directives that constrain the ability of metropolitan transit providers to provide a full range of transit services, including reverse commute routes,suburb-to-suburb routes,transit hub feeder services or new, experimental services that may show a low rate of operating cost recovery from the fare box. In the interest of including all potential options in the pursuit of a regionally balanced transit system, Metro Cities supports the repeal of the gag order on the Dan Patch Commuter Rail Line and opposes the imposition of legislative moratoriums on the study, planning, design, or construction of specific transit projects. In the interest of safety and traffic management,Metro Cities supports further study of rail safety issues relating to water quality protections,public safety concerns relating to derailments,traffic implications from longer and more frequent trains and the sensitive balance between rail commerce and the quality-of-life impacts on the communities through which they pass. The COVID-19 crisis has had dramatic effects on public transit service, including changing business practices that are likely to substantially reduce transit demand for the foreseeable future. Adverse economic effects threaten revenues available to fund transit operations. Suburban transit providers are concerned that funding challenges may be used to attempt to justify a repeal of their authorizing legislation and to consolidate transit services into a single regional entity. This would result in reverting to conditions existing nearly 40 years ago when inadequate service caused twelve suburbs to elect not to be part of the traditional transit system. Metro Cities strongly supports the autonomy of suburban transit providers to conduct operations to meet demonstrated and unique needs in their designated service areas independent from the operations of other regional transit providers. 2023 Legislative Policies 56 Transportation 5-C Transit Financing Shifting demographics in the metropolitan region will mean increased demand for various modes of transit in areas with and without current transit service. MVST revenue projections are unpredictable,and the Legislature has repeatedly reduced general fund support for Metro Transit, which contributes to persistent operating deficits for regional transit providers. Operating subsidies necessary to support a regional system should come from regional and statewide funding sources and not local taxpayers.In recent years,state and regional resources for transit have diminished,with costs shifting to local taxpayers in the metropolitan area. A system of transit provides significant economic benefits to the state and metropolitan region and must be supported with state and regional revenue sources. In addition, capital costs for the expansion of the regional transit system should be supported through state and regional sources, and not the sole responsibility of local units of government. Metro Cities supports stable and predictable state and regional revenue sources to fund operating and capital expenses for all regional transit providers and Metro Mobility at a level sufficient to meet the growing operational and capital transit needs of the region and to expand the system to a reas that lack sufficient transit service options. Metro Cities continues to support an advisory role for municipal officials in decisions associated with local transit projects.Metro Cities supports the early engagement of local governments in transit project planning and development including project scoping, cost estimating, funding requests and coordination with overlapping initiatives to achieve successful corridor-based projects. 5-D Street Improvement Districts Funding sources for local transportation projects are limited to the use of Municipal State Aid Street Program(MSAS),property taxes and special assessments. In addition, cities under 5,000 in population are not eligible for MSA. With increasing pressures on city budgets and limited tools and resources, cities are finding it increasingly difficult to maintain aging streets. Street improvement districts allow cities in developed and developing areas to fund new construction as well as reconstruction and maintenance efforts. The street improvement district is designed to allow cities, through a fair and objective fee structure, to create a district or districts within the city in which fees are raised on properties in the district and spent within the boundaries of the district. Street improvement districts would also aid cities under 5,000 with an alternative to the property tax system and special assessments. Metro Cities supports the authority of local units of government to establish street improvement districts.Metro Cities also supports changes to special assessment laws to make assessing state-owned property a more predictable process with uniformity in the payment of assessments across the state. 2023 Legislative Policies 57 Transportation 5-E Highway and Bridge Turn Backs &Funding Cities do not have the financial capacity and in many cities the technical expertise other than through significant property tax increases,to absorb additional roadway or bridge infrastructure responsibilities without new funding sources. The existing municipal turnback fund is not adequate based on contemplated turn backs. Metro Cities supports jurisdictional reassignment or turnback of roads (Minn. Stat. § 161.16,subd.4)on a phased basis using functional classifications and other appropriate criteria subject to a corresponding mechanism for adequate funding of roadway improvements and continued maintenance. Metro Cities does not support a wholesale turnback of county or state roads or bridges without the consent of the municipality and the total cost, agreed to by the municipality, being reimbursed to the city in a timely manner. The process for establishing state policies to assign a shared cost participation for newly constructed or rebuilt bridges over trunk highways to local officials,must include input by the local municipalities affected,and any assigned shared costs and responsibilities must be agreed to by the municipalities. 5-F "3C"Transportation Planning Process: Elected Officials' Role The Transportation Advisory Board(TAB) was developed to meet federal requirements, designating the Metropolitan Council as the organization that is responsible for a continuous, comprehensive, and cooperative(3C)transportation planning process to allocate federal funds among metropolitan area projects.Input by local officials into the planning and prioritization of transportation investments in the region is a vital component of these processes. Metro Cities supports continuation of the TAB with a majority of locally elected municipal officials as members and participating in the process. 5-G Electronic Imaging for Enforcement of Traffic Laws Enforcement of traffic laws with cameras and other motion imaging technology has been demonstrated to improve driver compliance and safety. Metro Cities supports cities having the authority to use such technology,including photos and videos, to enforce traffic laws. 5-H Transportation Network Companies and Alternative Transportation Modes The introduction of transportation network companies (TNC) such as Lyft and Uber, vehicle sharing and other wheeled transportation modes such as bicycles and scooters,require the need for local officials to determine licensing and inspection requirements for these modes, and to address issues concerning management over public rights-of-way. Cities have the authority to license rideshare companies,inspect vehicles, license drivers,and regulate access to sidewalks 2023 Legislative Policies 58 Transportation and streets. The use of autonomous delivery robots and aerial drones in public rights-of-way is also becoming more prevalent and cities must maintain and enhance the authority necessary to regulate the use of these vehicles to ensure safe use of the public right of way. Metro Cities supports the authority of local officials to regulate and establish fees on these transportation modes.Emerging and future transportation technologies have potentially significant implications for local public safety and local public service levels,the needs and impacts of which vary by community. 5-I Airport Noise Mitigation Communities closest to MSP and reliever airports are significantly impacted by noise,traffic, and other numerous expansion-related issues. Metro Cities supports the broad goal of providing MSP-impacted communities greater representation on the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC). Metro Cities encourages continued communication between MAC commissioners and the cities they represent.Balancing the needs of the MAC, the business community, and the airport host cities and their residents requires open communication,planning and coordination. Cities must be viewed as partners with the MAC in resolving differences that arise out of airport projects and the development of adjacent parcels. Regular contact between the MAC and cities throughout a project proposal process will enhance communication and problem solving. The MAC should provide full funding for noise mitigation for all structures in communities impacted by flights in and out of MSP. Metro Cities supports noise abatement programs and expenditures and the work of the Noise Oversight Committee to minimize the impacts of MAC operated facilities on neighboring communities. The MAC should determine the design and geographic reach of these programs only after a thorough public input process that considers the priorities and concerns of impacted cities and their residents.The MAC should provide full funding for noise mitigation for all structures in communities impacted by flights in and out of MSP. 5-J Funding for Non-Municipal State Aid (MSAS) City Streets Cities under 5,000 in population do not directly receive non-property tax funds for collector and arterial streets. Cities over 5,000 residents have limited eligibility for dedicated Highway User Tax Distribution Fund dollars, which are capped by the state constitution as being available for up to twenty percent of streets. Current County State Aid Highway(CSAH) distributions to metropolitan counties are inadequate to provide for the needs of smaller cities in the metropolitan area. Possible funding sources include the five-percent set-aside account in the Highway User Tax Distribution Fund,modification to county municipal accounts, street improvement districts, and/or state general funds. The 2015 Legislature created a Small Cities Assistance Account that is distributed through a formula to cities with populations under 5,000. The Account has received periodic one-time appropriations, but no stable or dedicated source of funding. 2023 Legislative Policies 59 Transportation Cities need long-term,stable,funding for street improvements and maintenance.Metro Cities supports additional resources and flexible policies to meet local infrastructure needs and increased demands on city streets. Metro Cities also supports sustainable state funding sources for non-MSAS city streets, including funding for the Small Cities Assistance Account as well as support for the creation and funding of a Large Cities Assistance Account. 5-K County State Aid Highway (CSAH) Distribution Formula Significant resource needs remain in the metro area CSAH system. Revenues provided by the Legislature for the CSAH system have resulted in a higher number of projects being completed. However, greater pressure is being placed on municipalities to participate in cost sharing activities, encumbering an already over-burdened local funding system. When the alternative is not building or maintaining roads,cities bear not only the costs of their local systems but also as much as fifty percent of county road projects. Metro Cities supports special or additional funding for cities that have burdens of additional cost participation in projects involving county roads. CSAH eligible roads were designated by county engineers in 1956 and although only 10 percent of the CSAH roads are in the metro area,they account for nearly 50 percent of the vehicle miles traveled. The CSAH formula passed by the Legislature in 2008 increased the amount of CSAH funding for the metropolitan area from 18 percent in 2007 to 21 percent in 2011. The formula helps to better account for needs in the metropolitan region but is only the first step in addressing needs for additional resources for the region. Metro Cities supports a new CSAH formula more equitably designed to fund the needs of our metropolitan region. 5-L Municipal Input/Consent for Trunk Highways and County Roads State statutes direct the Minnesota Department of Transportation(MnDOT)to submit detailed plans,with city cost estimates, at a point one-and-a-half to two years prior to bid letting, at which time public hearings are held for community input. If MnDOT does not concur with requested changes,it may appeal. Currently,that process would take a maximum of three and a half months and the results of the appeals board are binding on both the city and MnDOT. Metro Cities supports the municipal consent process and opposes changes to weaken municipal consent or adding another level of government to the consent process. Metro Cities opposes changes to current statutes that would allow MnDOT to disregard the appeals board ruling for state trunk highways. Such a change would significantly minimize MnDOT's need to negotiate in good faith with cities for appropriate project access and alignment and would render the public hearing and appeals process meaningless. Metro Cities also opposes the elimination of the county road municipal consent and appeal process for these reasons. 2023 Legislative Policies 60 Transportation 5-M Plat Authority Current law grants counties review and comment authority for access and drainage issues for city plats abutting county roads. Metro Cities opposes any statutory change that would grant counties veto power or that would shorten the 120-day review and permit process time. 5-N MnDOT Maintenance Budget The state has failed in its responsibility for maintaining major roads throughout the state by requiring, through omission, that cities bear the burden of maintaining major state roads. MnDOT should be required to meet standards adopted by cities through local ordinances, or reimburse cities for labor, equipment and material used on the state's behalf to improve public safety or meet local standards. Furthermore, if a city performs maintenance, the city should be fully reimbursed. Metro Cities supports MnDOT taking full responsibility for maintaining state-owned infrastructure and property,including,but not limited to,sound walls and right of way within city limits. Metro Cities supports cooperative agreements between cities and MnDOT,which have proven to be effective in other parts of the state. Metro Cities supports adequate state funding for the maintenance of state rights-of-way. 5-0 Transit Taxing District The transit taxing district,which funds the capital cost of transit service in the Metropolitan Area through the property tax system, is inequitable. Because the boundaries of the transit taxing district do not correspond with any rational service line nor is being within the boundaries a guarantee to receive service, cities within and outside of the taxing district are contributing unequally to the transit service in the Metropolitan Area. This inequity should be corrected. Metro Cities supports a stable revenue source to fund both the capital and operating costs for transit at the Metropolitan Council. However,Metro Cities does not support the expansion of the transit taxing district without a corresponding increase in service and an overall increase in operational funds. To do so would create additional property taxes without a corresponding benefit. 5-P Complete Streets A complete street may include sidewalks,bike lanes (or wide paved shoulders), special bus lanes, comfortable and accessible public transportation stops, frequent and safe crossing opportunities,median islands, accessible pedestrian signals, curb extensions,narrower travel lanes and more. A complete street in a rural area will differ from a complete street in a highly urban area,but both are designed to balance safety and convenience for everyone using the road. 2023 Legislative Policies 61 Transportation Metro Cities supports options in state design guidelines for complete streets that would give cities greater flexibility to: • Safely accommodate all modes of travel; • Lower traveling speeds on local streets; • Address city infrastructure needs; and • Ensure livability in the appropriate context for each city. Metro Cities opposes state-imposed mandates that would increase street infrastructure improvement costs in locations and instances where providing access for alternative modes including cycling and walking are deemed unnecessary or inappropriate as determined by local jurisdictions. 2023 Legislative Policies 62 2022 Municipal Revenues Committee Members Name Title Organization Daniel Buchholtz City Administrator Spring Lake Park Gary Carlson** IGR Director League of MN Cities —I Casey Casella Management Analyst Savage Jim Dickinson City Administrator Andover Lori Economy-Scholler* Chief Financial Officer Bloomington LaTonia Green Finance Director Brooklyn Park Dana Hardie City Manager Victoria Alex Hassel** IGR Representative League of MN Cities Chris Heineman City Administrator Little Canada Steven Huser Government Relations Representative Minneapolis Tom Lawell City Administrator Apple Valley Daniel Lightfoot** IGR Representative League of MN Cities _ Madeline Mitchell Senior Budget Analyst St. Paul Darin Nelson Finance Director Minnetonka I Loren Olson IGR Director Minneapolis Hannah Pallmeyer** Community Relations Specialist Metropolitan Council Cara Schulz Councilmember Burnsville LSteven Stahmer City Administrator Rogers Christian Taylor IGR Director St. Paul Christina Volkers City Administrator Oakdale *Committee Chair **Guest/Non-City Official 63 2022 Housing & Economic Development Committee Members Name 1 Tit ee Organization Karen Barton 1 Community Development Director St. Louis Park 1 Ryan Baumtrog** 1 Asst. Commissioner, Policy & Community Development MHFA _ Josh Berg Councilmember Elko New Market Kim Berggren Community Development Director Brooklyn Park Jody Brennan Councilmember Shakopee Jenn Brewington Community & Economic Development Director Victoria Kirt Briggs Mayor Prior Lake Connie Buesgens Councilmember Columbia Heights Heather Butkowski City Administrator Lauderdale Gary Carlson** IGR Director League of MN Cities Aaron Chirpich Community Development Director Columbia Heights Jeffrey Dahl City Manager Wayzata Ben Gozola Asst. Director of Community Assets and Development New Brighton Janice Gundlach Community Development Director Roseville Maurice Harris Councilmember Golden Valley Alex Hassel** IGR Representative League of MN Cities Stephanie Hawkinson Affordable Housing Development Manager and Planning Edina Chris Heineman City Administrator Little Canada Joe Hogeboom Community & Economic Development Director Maple Grove Steven Huser Government Relations Representative Minneapolis Cheryl Jacobson City Administrator Mendota Heights Irene Kao** IGR Counsel League of MN Cities Dan Kitzberger** Legislative Director MHFA Daniel Lightfoot** IGR Representative League of MN Cities Steve Morris Councilmember Woodbury Bruce Nordquist Community Development Director Apple Valley Loren Olson IGR Director Minneapolis Hannah Pallmeyer** Community Relations Specialist Metropolitan Council_ Richard Paul Councilmember Blaine Michael Sable Assistant City Manager Bloomington Rebecca Schack Councilmember Minnetonka Cara Schulz Councilmember Burnsville Eric Searles Asst. Community Development Director Woodbury Alex Sharpe Planner & Economic Development Specialist Apple Valley Tracy Shimek* Housing & Economic Development Coordinator White Bear Lake Cherie Shoquist Housing & Economic Development Manager Golden Valley Lori Sommers Senior Planner Plymouth 1 Mike Supina Councilmember Eagan Christian Taylor IGR Director St. Paul Julie Urban Housing & Redevelopment Manager Richfield Jason Wedel 1 City Manager Prior Lake Julie Wischnack 1 Community Development Director Minnetonka *Committee Chair **Guest/Non-City Official 64 2022 Metropolitan Agencies Committee Members Name Title Organization Deb Calvert Councilmember Minnetonka Macheal Collins City Clerk Burnsville Jim Dickinson City Administrator Andover Thomas Fletcher Councilmember Greenwood _Gary Hansen Councilmember Eagan Alex Hassel** IGR Representative League of MN Cities Dana Hardie City Manager Victoria _ Steven Huser Government Relations Representative Minneapolis Cheryl Jacobson City Administrator Mendota Heights Elizabeth Kautz Mayor Burnsville Gregg Lindberg City Manager Burnsville Amada Marquez Simula Mayor Columbia Heights Deb McMillan Mayor Victoria Hugo McPhee Assistant City Manager Burnsville Loren Olson IGR Director 1 Minneapolis Hannah Pallmeyer** Community Relations Specialist Metropolitan Council Izaak Peterson Senior Planner Victoria Jay Stroebel* City Manager Brooklyn Park Christian Taylor IGR Director 1 St. Paul Nyle Zikmund City Administrator 1 Mounds View *Committee Chair **Guest/Non-City Official 65 2022 Transportation & General Government Committee Members Name Title Organization Josh Berg Councilmember Elko New Market Jody Brennan Councilmember Shakopee Kissy Coakley I Councilmember Minnetonka Anne Finn** Assistant IGR Director League of MN Cities Thomas Fletcher Councilmember Greenwood Mike Funk City Manager Minnetonka Gary Hansen I Councilmember Eagan Alex Hassel** I IGR Representative League of MN Cities Mike Huang* Councilmember Chaska Steven Huser Government Relations Representative Minneapolis Craig Johnson** I IGR Representative League of MN Cities Irene Kao** IGR Counsel League of MN Cities Dan Kealey Councilmember Burnsville Larry Kraft Councilmember St. Louis Park Brad Larson I City Administrator Savage Daniel Lightfoot** IGR Representative League of MN Cities Amada Marquez Simula Mayor Columbia Heights _ _Mary McComber I Mayor Oak Park Heights Deb McMillan I Mayor Victoria Justin Miller 1 City Administrator Lakeville Steve Morris —1 Councilmember Woodbury Heidi Nelson I City Administrator Maple Grove Loren Olson IGR Director Minneapolis Hannah Pallmeyer** Community Relations Specialist Metropolitan Council Chelsea Petersen Assistant City Administrator Shakopee Ryan Peterson I Public Works Director Burnsville Dan Ruiz Public Works Director Brooklyn Park Judd Schetnan** Director of Government Affairs Metropolitan Council Dave Shoger Public Works Director Victoria _Christian Taylor I IGR Director St. Paul Michael Thompson I Public Works Director Plymouth Patrick Trudgeon City Manager Roseville Wally Wysopal —1 City Manager Fridley Nyle Zikmund I City Administrator Mounds View *Committee Chair ** Guest/Non-City Official 66 OARIC00 MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE COMMISSION MLC 2023 DRAFT LEGISLATIVE PLATFORM Housing and Home Ownership Housing is a top priority for MLC cities,particularly in supporting affordable home ownership for low to moderate income residents. Increasing access to home ownership for black, indigenous, and people of color is a high priority for our Commission. A variety of housing options within each of our cities is very important,however MLC is focusing its efforts on access to moderately priced starter homes,which will enhance the ability of Minnesotans to achieve inter-generational wealth growth via homeownership. Specifically, supporting initiatives and funding to secure and maintain existing housing stock(NOAH), as well as finding ways to incentivize builders to bring affordable housing options to our cities. Opportunities for affordable home ownership continue to be a challenge in our communities for a number of reasons, especially as the real estate market has transformed the housing industry and builders are now focusing on single-family and townhomes with more square footage and higher quality amenities than previously,which drive up the cost of housing transactions. In addition to the changes driven by the market,Minnesota faces a variety of challenges including an underproduction of new home construction for the past 10 years,the high cost and scarcity of land,building materials, and labor, the exceptionally active real estate market, and institutional investors purchasing existing homes with significant conversion to rental, as well as other market forces. In order to address this challenge, a variety of housing solutions will be necessary to provide more affordable home ownership opportunities including significant State investments. Specific policies and programs supported by MLC include: I. Support for Affordable Home Ownership a. Investments to preserve existing affordable homes: i. Increase funding for naturally occurring affordable housing(NOAH)preservation grants. ii. Increase investment in Housing Infrastructure Bonds (HIB). iii. Expand NOAH Preservation programs to include townhome and condominium ownership. Affordability is defined as buyers making 115%AMI and spending no more than 30%of their income on housing. b. Incentivize production of affordable homes by: i. Support for a state tax exemption/credit to generate production of low to moderately priced homeownership opportunities. ii. Provide state funding for community land trusts. II. Downpayment Assistance a. Support state funding for downpayment assistance programs to assist first generation homebuyers. b. Support financing opportunities for BIPOC first-time home-buyers. III. Collaboratively address statewide housing cost drivers a. Streamline state building codes and determine if existing codes create competitive advantages for neighboring states. b. Eliminate duplication and redundancy between the agencies involved in the storm water/environmental permitting process. c. Streamline the process and provide local governments more flexibility in MUSA line adjustments. IV. Preserve local autonomy and community characteristics a. Support city authority to protect existing tax payers and recover costs associated with development activity including street infrastructure. b. Preserve local government authority for land use decisions such as zoning and regulatory controls. c. Recognize benefits of having a diverse collection of communities that provide choices across the housing spectrum. Public Safety Public safety has been a growing area of concern for MLC cities,particularly with motor vehicle theft, auto part theft(catalytic converters), and carjackings. Many aspects of the criminal justice system need to be reviewed for potential reforms including how cases are prosecuted, impact of bail guidelines,the use of sign and release warrants for violent crimes, as well as focusing on how to best address juvenile offenders. Coordination and collaboration between cities, counties, and the criminal justice system will be imperative in addressing these challenging issues. Specific policies and programs supported by MLC include: I. Support for public safety duty disability reform a. In recent years, the number of public safety employees seeking duty disability determinations through PERA and workers compensation claims for line of duty injuries has significantly increased. The fiscal impact of these rising claims is unsustainable for cities and ultimately,taxpayers. As a result, MLC supports the following reform measures: i. Full state funding for the Public Safety Officer Benefit account, which reimburses employers who provide continued health insurance to police officers and firefighters injured in the line of duty and the dependents of those killed. ii. Funding to reimburse local governments for providing paid time off to public safety employees experiencing work related trauma and/or who are seeking treatment for a mental injury. iii. Funding for initiatives and programs which provide peer support, emotional trauma training, early intervention, and mental health treatment. II. Support state funding to address juvenile offenders including detention, treatment, mental health support, and educational programs Tax Policy and Local Issues MLC supports local control, including in the areas of taxes and fiscal policy. MLC supports policies that promote greater stability and predictability in the fiscal relationship between the state and local units of government. Specific policies and programs supported by MLC include: a. Support for direct property tax relief through the Property Tax Refund and Rental Credit programs. b. Simplify the process for a sales tax exemption on construction materials for cities, counties, school districts and other local governments. c. Preserve the integrity of the Fiscal Disparities Program by not removing revenue from the pool to pay for one-off legislative priorities. d. Support for the Repeal of the Local Government Salary Cap. Infrastructure and Transportation Investments According to 2020 census data, MLC cities combined are among the biggest job producing areas in the state with over half a million employees (530,660) compared to Minneapolis/St. Paul with a combined total of 455,689. Along with those jobs comes added congestion and demand on transit and roads in MLC Cities. MLC supports increased, regionally balanced, investment in transportation and infrastructure to maintain and grow a robust transportation network. Specific policies and programs supported by MLC include: a. Increase investments in Corridors of Commerce. b. Increase investments in Transportation Economic Development. c. Passage of a robust,regionally balanced bonding bill that includes significant investment in suburban communities. d. Fully fund the required state matching dollars to leverage federal grant opportunities for programs including IIJA, Inflation Reduction Act, and CHIPS Act. e. Flexibility for cities to impose infrastructure fees so the costs of new development aren't shifted onto existing taxpayers. Workforce Support and Economic Expansion As the Governor's Council on Economic Expansion recently noted,housing and workforce issues are closely related. MLC supports the Council's recommendations on housing and on increased investments in economic development. Specific policies and programs supported by MLC include: a. Increased investment in the Minnesota Investment Fund(MIF). b. Increased investment in the Job Creation Fund(JCF). Cannabinoid and Recreational Marijuana Regulatory and Licensing Framework With a recent law, MLC cities have faced the allowance of certain edible and beverage products infused with tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)to be sold. A strong regulatory framework with clear licensing, inspection, enforcement, and reporting requirements are needed to address the sale of edible marijuana products containing cannabinoid THC. Should the Legislature decide to approve adult-use marijuana,these same needs are expected. The Legislature will need to address public safety, employment,public health, and taxation issues with cannabinoid and marijuana legalization. Maintaining the authority for local licenses and zoning regulations will be important to MLC and should be part of any state regulatory framework. A special thanks to our Legislative Program and Housing Subcommittee members: Aarica Coleman:HRA Administrator,Bloomington Jason Wedel: City Manager,Prior Lake Anne Burt:Mayor,Woodbury Jim Hovland:Mayor,Edina(MLC Chair) Bill Droste:Mayor,Rosemount Justin Miller: City Administrator,Lakeville Dave Callister: City Manager,Plymouth Kirt Briggs: Mayor,Prior Lake Doug Anderson:Mayor,Lakeville Mike Funk: City Manager,Minnetonka Brad Wiersum:Mayor,Minnetonka Mike Maguire:Mayor,Eagan Dianne Miller: City Administrator,Eagan Justin Miller:City Administrator,Lakeville Heidi Nelson: City Administrator,Maple Grove Rick Getschow: City Manager,Eden Prairie Jamie Verbrugge: City Manager,Bloomington Tom Lawell:City Administrator,Apple Valley For questions about the MLC's Legislative Program,please contact: • Tom Poul tpoul@messerlikramer.com • Katy Sen ksen@messerlikramer.com • Elise Busse ebusse@messerlikramer.com • Or call Messerli I Kramer,P.A. at 651-228-9757. Et 2023 It ,..,FE;rt • , . . Legislative yyy ...-. {.• ii, y o es . .•f l Ik .. - ' 4 { .t i, .1 . . •,1 1 _ Decem ber 8 2022 4 ' , - r t - - - • ii.-F..-"Z. ;:i.,1 . 7:._.._ , ..,_ . ..ir. , _, _Txr,,,. • • • • • ,. r ! r • . 1 .•_.. - t .. ..rcr, ,: , _• r . 1 . pple 18 : ,.... ,mil !rp 1 �i ' . . : - Vaiie 2023 Legislative Session • Begins on January 3, 2023 • Expected to end May 22, 2023 Tonight Opportunity for Council to Discuss Draft Legislative Policies and Priorities •••• ••••• •••• ••• pp1e11 Vaue j 2023 Legislative Policies ■ League of Minnesota Cities • Metro Cities • Municipal Legislative Commission 2023 Legislative Policies ■ League of Minnesota Cities ■ Green • Metro Cities ■ White • Municipal Legislative Commission ■ Yellow ;*•, City of Apple Valley DRAFT Apple lley Legislative Policy Priorities for 2023 Homestead Market Value Exclusion n 20"".:he eg s a:ure repealed t-e existing homestead market value credit program and replaced it with a ne:: Hor-esteac Market Value exclusion. Under the homestead marke:value e:xcLision, ar amount equal to 4C, oercent c'-.he assessor's estimate of the homes marks: value for a -ome _p:0 376.000 in marks:•value is exc_ded from taxe,ion.For homes in excess of 5.000 or --arket va..e the exc...sio-1 phases out as rrr'"'e values increase ur:i : is totally o'iasec c..: -oar homes over 341.3.8;0.The general parameters oftleo•ogram-lave not changed since 2v11 Theivedian home value i-I Apple`/alley in201 I ;as 32C.3.200 and mane:homeowners cualifiec fo•a.s cri-cant va..e exclusion from taxation. In 2022 :he median home value in Apple Valley is $3a2,800 and :he..aloe of the program a greatl; cim risl•ed. Due to the recent rapid increase in home values, :he C:,: supports mods'Cations to t-ie homestead marker value exclusion oragram to increase the berefit or the exclusion to aual,f•;ind homeowners a-id to 'urtrer promote home ownership in the I-I ' Ii I 1 ht i n9 J J Sales Tax Exemption on Construction Materials Support legislation to streamline the specially required for cities secure the salesnttax 1projects exemption 10 Ke cr. can_truct��r. materials_ This is especially important as the City has significant capital projects planned in upcoming years to support Police,Fire,Public Works and Parks&Recreation services. Transportation Funding Support the ementconn a the venue northbound third lane on Cedar Avenue, and t the 14an Legislative safety ml.rcvementson Cedar Avenue including the installation of a pedestrian sk��..-..ay at the 147'h Stree: Station. Supoort stable and soft e-it t-anspcoation 'undiriq for state and local roads and sageort :he Transp,,nation Economic. Development °rccram anc the Corricois of Commerce Program that :•rt do c package for roads bricges and:ransit.ins' ding r•vestmen#s in suburban areas. Full•; fund the rewired state matching do lars :a leve•acie 'ederal grant opportJri-ias for grog-ens including the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act and the Inflation Reduction Ac:. Development Fees and Housing p Support legislation that gives cities local control and the ability to impose infrastructure and permit 'ees s,iicient to ensure that development standards are fully met and the cost of new development is ro: shifted onto existing taxpayers. The City supports fees anc regulations necessary for new deve oo--ent to pay for itself The City supports afforcable home 0omers-ip p•ograms tha:Mll help increase f.r-id-a to su000rt:he preser'-patron of natural y occ.-ri-ig afordable housing l:`,OA.H;,in :he ccmn-m..-itf. :'e a so supp l:t-e oreservation of-or-a c•.-ie-ship opportunities in our s ngle 'an-mil: -le a-oo•hoode a-id are :once—led by national investor firm= o.avino up single fami v homes and converting them to rental p•ooert_j. Mary of these homes being purchased are alder, more It aiordeole homes which could go to ;curs ramilies who hope to bu Id equity and move up the economic ladder. Alcohol Distribution and Control Oppose legislation that would expand the sale of alcohol in grocery stores and other retail establishments. Such expansion would increase the likelihood of drunk driving and underage alcohol sales and consumption and would also have a detrimental economic impact on current off- se e reta lens.ino_ding the City of Apple Valley. Homestead Market Value Exclusion • In 2011, the legislature repealed the existing Homestead Market Value Credit Program and replaced it with a new Homestead Market Value Exclusion Program (HMVE). • Under HMVE, an amount equal to 40 percent of the assessor's estimate of the home's market value for a home up to $76,000 in market value is excluded from taxation. • For homes in excess of $76,000 of market value, the exclusion phases out as home values increase until it is totally phased out for homes over $413,800. Homestead Market Value Exclusion Homestead Market Value Exclusion 35,000 30,000 E 25,000 •_ 20,000 V -0 15,000 ID t0,000 0 5,000 0 Homestead Estimated Market Value Homestead Market Value Exclusion The general parameters of the program have not changed since inception in 2011. The median home value in Apple Valley in 2011 was $203,200 and many homeowners qualified for a significant value exclusion from taxation. • In 2022 the median home value in Apple Valley is $352,800 and the value of the program is greatly diminished. • If the program had been indexed to the rate of inflation, the maximum exclusion would occur at $99,374 and the phase-out value would now be $541,066. Homestead Market Value Exclusion L egisla tive Ask, , , Due to the significant increase in housing values, modify the homestead market value exclusion program to increase the benefit of the exclusion to quafifying homeowners Sales Tax Exemptions Currently most, but not all, purchases made by cities are exempt from state sales tax. For example, motor vehicle sales tax on marked police and firefighting vehicles are tax exempt, but other vehicles are not. • In order to receive sales tax exemption on construction materials, cities must follow complex bidding rules to claim a refund. • Currently the construction cost sales tax exemption on materials applies only to public safety buildings. Sales Tax Exemptions L egisla tive Ask, , , Support legislation to streamline the process required for cities to secure the sales tax exemption on construction materials for all City buildings and make all City vehicle purchases tax exempt Transportation Funding • Support a balanced transportation funding package for roads, bridges and transit, including investments in suburban areas. • Support construction of missing third lane on Cedar Avenue and pedestrian safety improvements at the 147th Street Station. • Support State funding for local roads through the Transportation Economic Development (TED) Program and the Corridors of Commerce Program. Transportation Funding Legislative Ask, , , Support construction of the missing third lane on Cedar A venue and the skybridge pedestrian safety impro yemen t at the 147th Street Station Development Fees & Housing • Cities need local control and the ability to impose infrastructure and permit fees sufficient to ensure that development standards are fully met and costs are not shifted onto existing taxpayers. • The City supports affordable home ownership programs that will help increase funding to support the preservation of naturally occurring affordable housing (NOAH). • Concerned about national investment firms buying up single family homes and converting them to rental property, thereby reducing home ownership opportunities. Development Fees & Housing L egisla tive Ask, , , Support local control of development fees and comp/lance with development codes. Support the preservation of NOAH and explore ways to maintain homeownership opportunities in our neighborhoods. Alcohol Distribution & Control • Oppose legislation that would expand the sale of alcohol in grocery stores and other retail establishments. • Such expansion would increase the likelihood of drunk driving and underage alcohol sales and consumption. • Additionally, such expansion would have a detrimental economic impact on current off-sale retailers, including the City of Apple Valley. • For 2022, we anticipate an $850,000 transfer from our liquor fund to support City operations and capital expenditures. Since 2002, a total of $10.73 million has been transferred. Alcohol Distribution & Control L egisla tive Ask, . , Oppose legislation that would expand the sale of alcohol in grocery stores and other retail establishments, Regulation of Cannabinoid Products In 2022, the legislature passed legislation that authorized the sale of certain edibles and beverages infused with tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) extracted from hemp. • There are significant gaps in State oversight and accountability for the manufacturing, testing, and distribution of the products. • Additionally, the law does not provide any restrictions on where the products can be sold and offers no guidance for local governments to regulate the sale of the products. Regulation of Cannabinoid Products • The new law increases enforcement responsibilities for local governments which will result in additional costs for cities. • It now appears the Governor and legislature may consider legalizing adult-use cannabis during the 2023 session. • Cities must be included in the discussion to ensure that the state regulatory framework includes clear licensing, inspection, and enforcement provisions related to the cultivation, manufacturing, distribution, sales and taxation of cannabinoid products. Regulation of Cannabinoid Products L egisla tive Ask, , , Fix the gaps in the current THC law passed in 2022, If further legalization is considered, ensure that an effective State regulatory framework is created to provide clear licensing, inspection, taxation and enforcement provisions, Modernize Data Practices Act • The Minnesota Government Data Practices Act (MGDPA) must balance the right of citizens to access public data with the cost to municipalities of complying with certain types of data requests. • Cities continue to receive repetitive, overly broad data requests that require significant staff time to locate records, redact private data or data unrelated to the request, and assemble documents to be provided in order to comply with requirements to provide access to public government data. • Cities cannot charge for this information unless paper copies are requested. • Maximum reimbursement is 25 cents per page. Modernize Data Practices Act L egisla tive Ask, , , Support changes to the Minnesota Data Practices Act to reflect today's data intensive environment, protect municipalities from abusive or harassing requests and to compensate municipalities for overly broad and burdensome requests. Electric Charging Stations on Public Property • Increasingly vehicles that are powered by electricity are being offered by manufacturers as an alternative to gas-powered vehicles. • The City installed an electric vehicle charging station at the Apple Valley Municipal Center to accommodate the charging needs for City vehicles. • The charging station is also made available for public use for a fee, and public use is increasing. • We have explored adding similar charging stations at other City facilities, but state law is currently vague regarding a City's ability to offer such services to the public. Electric Charging Stations on Public Property L egisla tive Ask. , , Clarify State Ia w regarding the ability for cities to install electric vehicle charging stations on city property to offer service to the publlc for a fee, Emerald Ash Borer Grant Assistance • Emerald ash borer (EAB) is a destructive insect that was discovered in Apple Valley in 2015. • EAB has decimated our ash tree population. • The City has aggressively addressed the issue by removing many ash trees and replanting a more diverse urban forest throughout the City, but much more remains to be done. • The State has offered some grant programs to assist cities, but more resources are needed if we are to fully meet this challenge. Emerald Ash Borer Grant Assistance L egisla tive Ask, , , Support additional state funding to support forestry efforts to remove dying ash trees and establish a more diverse urban forest, Emergency Medical Services • The City of Apple Valley, in partnership with the cities of Lakeville and Farmington, have jointly provided advanced life support ambulance service to its residents through the joint powers entity known as ALF Ambulance since 1986. • In 2008 ALF Ambulance entered into an agreement with Allina Medical Transportation to provide ambulance service within the ALF Primary Service Area (PSA). • ALF Ambulance currently holds the Emergency Medical Service License issued by the Emergency Medical Services Regulatory Board (EMSRB). Emergency Medical Services • The EMSRB was recently subject to a Legislative Auditor review that found many concerns. • The Auditor urged the Legislature to retain primary service areas, restructure how those areas are created, modified and overseen, and create a process to periodically review those areas. • While some areas of the state may have poor ambulance service, we are fortunate to have the model we have with ALF and Allina. • The structure and regulatory framework of the EMSRB may undergo legislative revision in 2023. Emergency Medical Services L egisla tive Ask, , , Oppose any revisions that would impact the ability of ALF Ambulance to continue to operate its ambulance service into the future. Will there be a State Bonding Bill in 2023 ? •••• •��• City of Apple Valley DRAF- 1 A pple Valle Possible 2023 Bonding Requests 147t" Street Inclusive Fire Station #2 Police Garage Station Playground Replacement Operations Skybridge Project Project Project Project Total Project $8,250,457 $1 ,381 ,380 $15,005,000 $11,737,000 Cost 0 50% State $4,125,228 $690,690 $7,502,500 $5,868,500 Bonding Grant I Request City of Apple Valley DRAFT AppValley Core Legislative Principles Local Control Local Mayors and City Councilmembers are duly elected by their citizens and are in the best position to make decisions on behalf of their community. They are accountable for their decisions. State legislative decisions should reflect this understanding and local officials should be allowed to do the jobs they have been elected to do. Unfunded Mandates The imposition of state mandates and programs on local governments without the provision of slate funding is contrary to the concept of local control. Excessive reporting requirements should be identified and eliminated. Any function or activity mandated by the State upon local governments should be fully and continuously funded by the State. Spending and Tax Lids The imposition of taxing or spending limits on local governments is contrary to the spirit and effectiveness of our system of representative government. Local tax and spending policy decisions should be made locally_ Blanket limitations imposed statewide will have unintended consequences and will affect the ability to deliver essential public services. Preserve Local Government Revenues The legislature should not withhold or seek to otherwise divert local funds into the State General Fund. Local policy makers must have the ability to generate and save sufficient revenues to cover the cost of day-to-day service delivery, as well as future capital costs. Job Creation and Promotion of Economic Growth The economic success of our state is lied directly to the economic success of our cities. Building strong cities takes a long-range coordinated effort that allows local leaders to make local economic development decisions based their communities' vision for the future. The legislature should seek to maximize the number and type of economic development tools available to cities. Collaboration and Cooperation Local government jurisdictions within Dakota County have a long history of collaborating on ways to effectively and efficiently deliver necessary public services. The legislature should promote best management practices and provide incentives to further joint and collaborative practices around the state_ Discussion • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ® AppleV Pr � � e j On the Horizon . . . Legislative Delegation Invited to January 12, 2023 Informal City Council Meeting illt 11 ,_, , „itt, ..,-- ,.: - /...,:-__‘ Irv' . . 1 �j Senator ' epresentative Representative District 56 District 56A District 56B Erin Maye Robert John Quade Bierman Huot On the Horizon . . . Municipal Legislative Commission Legislative Breakfast February 17, 2023 Eagan Community Center Thank You ! • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • i pp1e11 lle A.GvnCral Purpose UI r6Light The General Purpose Ultra Light project would add a third lane northbound from 135th St to Project Area McAndrews Road in Apple Valley_ It would also PaYorrwna Widoning, re stripe the current roadway from a 2-lane to Lana Rastripin. a 3-Jame road from McAndrews north to I-35E. RICHFIELD Estimated Project cost $45M Latidiu Ln P Kalrhrrvr Dr 86 5t I th �+ • El • BLOCm I NOON 0 Hrmrr n EAGArt CounCy III Dokita IC R"lid COVihey _ t r irco • BURNSyILLE d` 138th Sc pi 140tir 5+i 'Add third larva northbound 0 I5.01"St E i • ITEM: 4.A. ..... :�. Apple COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 8, 2022 Valley SECTION: Consent Agenda Description: Approve Minutes of November 18, 2022, Special Meeting Staff Contact: Department/ Division: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk City Clerk's Office ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the minutes of the special meeting of November 18, 2022. SUMMARY: The minutes from the last special City Council meeting are attached for your review and approval. BACKGROUND: State statute requires the creation and preservation of meeting minutes which document the official actions and proceedings of public governing bodies. BUDGET IMPACT: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Minutes CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota November 18, 2022 Minutes of the special meeting of the City Council of Apple Valley, Dakota County, Minnesota, held November 18, 2022, at 4:00 o'clock p.m., at Apple Valley Municipal Center. PRESENT: Mayor Hooppaw; Councilmembers Bergman, Goodwin, and Melander. ABSENT: Councilmember Grendahl. City staff members present were: Assistant City Administrator Grawe, City Clerk Gackstetter, Deputy City Clerk Marschall. Mayor Hooppaw called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m. Everyone took part in the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag. APPROVAL OF AGENDA MOTION: of Melander, seconded by Goodwin, approving the agenda for today's meeting, as presented. Ayes -4 -Nays - 0. AUDIENCE Mayor Hooppaw asked if anyone was present to address the Council, at this time, on any item not on this meeting's agenda. No one requested to speak. CONSENT AGENDA None. CANVASS OF ELECTION RETURNS Ms. Gackstetter reviewed the results of the General Election held on November 8, 2022. A total of 25,209 ballots were cast, which represents a 68.5 percent voter turnout. Approximately 30 percent voted absentee and 1,199 people registered on Election Day. She thanked the judges and City staff for all their help. MOTION: of Goodwin, seconded by Bergman, adopting Resolution No. 2022-161 canvassing the returns of the November 8, 2022, City and General Election and declaring that Clint Hooppaw was elected Mayor for a four-year term commencing January 2, 2023; and John Bergman and Tom Melander were elected Councilmembers for four-year terms, each, commencing January 2, 2023. Ayes - 4 -Nays - 0. Discussion followed. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota November 18, 2022 Page 2 MOTION: of Bergman, seconded by Melander, to adjourn. Ayes -4 -Nays - 0. The meeting was adjourned at 4:06 o'clock p.m. Respectfully Submitted, /s/Pamela J. Gackstetter Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk Approved by the Apple Valley City Council on Clint Hooppaw, Mayor • ITEM: 4.B. ..... :�. Apple COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 8, 2022 Valley SECTION: Consent Agenda Description: Approve Minutes of November 22, 2022, Regular Meeting Staff Contact: Department/ Division: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk City Clerk's Office ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the minutes of the regular meeting of November 22, 2022. SUMMARY: The minutes from the last regular City Council meeting are attached for your review and approval. BACKGROUND: State statute requires the creation and preservation of meeting minutes which document the official actions and proceedings of public governing bodies. BUDGET IMPACT: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Minutes CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota November 22, 2022 Minutes of the regular meeting of the City Council of Apple Valley, Dakota County, Minnesota, held November 22, 2022, at 7:00 o'clock p.m., at Apple Valley Municipal Center. PRESENT: Mayor Hooppaw; Councilmembers Bergman, Goodwin, Grendahl, and Melander. ABSENT: None. City staff members present were: City Administrator Lawell, City Clerk Gackstetter, City Attorney Dougherty, City Engineer Anderson, Parks and Recreation Director Carlson, Deputy Police Chief Dahlstrom, Police Chief Francis, Finance Director Hedberg, Acting Community Development Director Lovelace, Fire Chief Russell, and Public Works Director Saam. Mayor Hooppaw called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Everyone took part in the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag. APPROVAL OF AGENDA MOTION: of Grendahl, seconded by Bergman, approving the agenda for tonight's meeting, as presented. Ayes - 5 -Nays - 0. AUDIENCE Mayor Hooppaw asked if anyone was present to address the Council, at this time, on any item not on this meeting's agenda. No one requested to speak. Mayor Hooppaw thanked everyone who came out for the tree lighting prior to the City Council meeting. He also thanked the RAVE Brass band and Apple Valley High School choirs for entertaining everyone. CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Hooppaw asked if the Council or anyone in the audience wished to pull any item from the consent agenda. There were no requests. MOTION: of Melander, seconded by Goodwin, approving all items on the consent agenda with no exceptions. Ayes - 5 -Nays - 0. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS MOTION: of Melander, seconded by Goodwin, approving the minutes of the regular meeting of November 10, 2022, as written. Ayes - 5 -Nays - 0. MOTION: of Melander, seconded by Goodwin, adopting Resolution No. 2022-162 appointing Greg Dahlstrom, as the Police Department Representative, to the CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota November 22, 2022 Page 2 Traffic Safety Advisory Committee, for a term expiring March 1, 2023. Ayes - 5 -Nays - O. MOTION: of Melander, seconded by Goodwin, approving the 2023 rates for City Attorney services, as attached to the Assistant City Administrator's memo. Ayes - 5 -Nays - 0. MOTION: of Melander, seconded by Goodwin, approving the 2023 fees for Community Center, Senior Center, Athletic Field Rentals, Johnny Cake Activity Center, Park Facilities, Redwood Pool and Apple Valley Family Aquatic Center, Sports Arena and Hayes Park Arena, and Valleywood Golf Course, and granting the Parks and Recreation Director or designee the latitude to adjust the fees for special promotions, as described in the Parks and Recreation Director's memo. Ayes - 5 - Nays - 0. MOTION: of Melander, seconded by Goodwin, adopting Resolution No. 2022-163 approving the State of Minnesota Joint Powers Agreement with the City of Apple Valley on behalf of its City Attorney and Police Department. Ayes - 5 -Nays - 0. MOTION: of Melander, seconded by Goodwin, approving Change Order No. 1 to the agreement with Ron Kassa Construction, Inc., in the amount of an additional $6,940.80; and accepting Project 2022-119, 2022 Concrete Removal & Replacement Services, as complete and authorizing final payment in the amount of$16,842.18. Ayes - 5 -Nays - O. MOTION: of Melander, seconded by Goodwin, accepting Project 2022-110, Greenleaf Townhouse 3rd Sanitary Sewer Improvements, as complete and authorizing final payment on the agreement with Insituform Technologies USA, LLC, in the amount of$109,257.55. Ayes - 5 -Nays - 0. MOTION: of Goodwin seconded by Bergman, approving the personnel actions as listed in the Personnel Report dated November 22, 2022. Ayes - 5 -Nays - 0. MOTION: of Goodwin seconded by Bergman, approving the claims and bills check registers dated,November 2, 2022, in the amount of$941,941.51, and November 9, 2022, in the amount of$2,755,230.55. Ayes - 5 -Nays - 0. END OF CONSENT AGENDA INTRODUCTION OF K9 MOOSE AND HANDLER POLICE OFFICER WITKOWSKI Police Chief Francis introduced K9 Moose and handler Police Officer Alex Witkowski to the Council. He also recognized Red's Chop Shop and owner, Lance (Red)Rosa, for their contributions to the K9 program. The Council welcomed Moose and Officer Witkowski to their new positions and thanked Mr. Rosa for his fundraising efforts. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota November 22, 2022 Page 3 GENERAL OBLIGATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN BONDS Mr. Hedberg introduced this item. He reviewed the Facilities Capital Improvement Plan and described the projects that would be included in the request for additional authority to issue up to $41,000,000 of Capital Improvement Plan bonds. Councilmember Melander left the meeting at 7:14 p.m. Mr. Hedberg said, if approved, the authority to issue these bonds would expire within 5 years. Councilmember Melander returned to the meeting at 7:16 p.m. However, it does not obligate the City Council to issue any bonds. Assuming $41 million in bonds is issued over four years with a 25-year term, with today's interest rates, the tax levy impact on the median-valued home would be $30 per year. The tax impact is about $3 per million issued. At the end of the fourth year, the impact would be $124 per year. Mayor Hooppaw called the public hearing to order at 7:23 p.m. to consider adopting a resolution giving preliminary approval to the issuance of General Obligation Capital Improvement Plan Bonds, in an amount not to exceed$41,000,000, and adopting the 2023-2027 Capital Improvement Plan. The Mayor asked for questions or comments from the Council and the audience. There were none and the hearing was declared closed at 7:24 p.m. MOTION: of Goodwin, seconded by Bergman, adopting Resolution No. 2022-164 giving preliminary approval to the issuance of General Obligation Capital Improvement Plan Bonds, in an amount not to exceed $41,000,000, and adopting the Capital Improvement Plan for years 2023-2027. Ayes - 5 -Nays - 0. 2023 ON-SALE LIQUOR AND WINE LICENSE RENEWALS Ms. Gackstetter reviewed her memo regarding renewal applications for On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor, Wine, and 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor licenses for 2023. She noted receipt of the affidavit of publication of the hearing notice and stated no comments have been received. Ms. Gackstetter stated that although the On-Sale 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor renewal licenses are included in the public hearing this evening, action on all 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor licenses will take place at a later date. Police Chief Francis said last year a business owner reported incidents near or around bars which were affecting neighboring properties. At last year's goal setting session, the Council asked the Police Department to prioritize safety around the restaurants/bars in our community. In response, the Police Department conducted additional proactive observation of all bars in the City and worked with the businesses to resolve issues, which were generally minor in nature. This additional time officers spent with the businesses to educate them on ordinance requirements and expectations proved beneficial. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota November 22, 2022 Page 4 Mayor Hooppaw called the public hearing to order at 7:32 p.m. to consider renewal applications for On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor, Wine, and 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor licenses for the year 2023. The Mayor asked for questions or comments from the Council and the audience. There were none and the hearing was declared closed at 7:33 p.m. MOTION: of Melander, seconded by Grendahl, approving renewal, for 2023, of On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor, Special License for Sunday Liquor Sales, and On-Sale Wine licenses, subject to receipt of the necessary fees and documents, by adopting Resolutions No. 2022-165 for Apple Minnesota, LLC, d/b/a Applebee's Neighborhood Grill & Bar; No. 2022-166 for Apple Valley Grill, LLC, d/b/a Wild Bill's Sports Saloon; No. 2022-167 for AV Hospitality SBC; No. 2022-168 for AVC, LLC, d/b/a Cowboy Jacks; No. 2022-169 for Blazin Wings, Inc., d/b/a Buffalo Wild Wings; No. 2022-170 for CCH, LLC, d/b/a Celts Craft House; No. 2022-171 for DDJ Crooked Pint Apple Valley, Inc., d/b/a Crooked Pint Ale House; No. 2022-172 for El Azteca Apple, Inc., d/b/a El Azteca Mexican Restaurant; No. 2022-173 for Farmer AV, LLC, d/b/a Farmer and the Fishmonger; No. 2022-174 for LoKo Bowling, Inc., d/b/a Bogart's Entertainment Center; No. 2022-175 for LSP Ventures, Inc., d/b/a Rascals Apple Valley Bar& Grill; No. 2022-176 for M, S &R, III, LLC, d/b/a Masu Sushi and Noodle; No. 2022-177 for Misfit AV, LLC, d/b/a Mezcalito Butcher; No. 2022-178 for Newt's 46, Inc; No. 2022-179 for Osaka AV, Inc., d/b/a Osaka Seafood Steakhouse; No. 2022-180 for PBAV-Sanders, LLC, d/b/a Panino Brothers; No. 2022-181 for Red Robin International, Inc., d/b/a Red Robin Gourmet Burgers &Brews; No. 2022- 182 for Tavern Apple Valley, LLC, d/b/a The Tavern Grill Restaurant+Bar; No. 2022-183 for Texas Roadhouse Holdings, LLC, d/b/a Texas Roadhouse; No. 2022-184 for Chipotle Mexican Grill of Colorado, LLC, d/b/a Chipotle Mexican Grill; No. 2022-185 for Civitali Restaurant Corporation d/b/a Punch Neapolitan Pizza; No. 2022-186 for D &D of Minnesota, Inc., d/b/a Famous Dave's BBQ Shack; No. 2022-187 for Ooka Bistro, Inc., d/b/a Ooka; and No. 2022-188 for Smashburger Acquisition Minneapolis, LLC, d/b/a Smashburger#1317. Ayes - 5 -Nays - O. Discussion followed. COMMUNICATIONS Mr. Lawell said Risor of Apple Valley is holding a grand opening ceremony on December 6, 2022, at 4:00 p.m. and the event should be added to the calendar of events. CALENDAR OF UPCOMING EVENTS MOTION: of Bergman, seconded by Grendahl, adding the Risor of Apple Valley grand opening ceremony on December 6, 2022, at 4:00 p.m. to the calendar, and approving the amended calendar of upcoming events as included in the Deputy CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota November 22, 2022 Page 5 City Clerk's memo, and noting that each event listed is hereby deemed a Special Meeting of the City Council. Ayes - 5 -Nays - 0. MOTION: of Grendahl, seconded by Bergman, to adjourn. Ayes - 5 -Nays - 0. The meeting was adjourned at 7:35 o'clock p.m. Respectfully Submitted, /s/Pamela J. Gackstetter Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk Approved by the Apple Valley City Council on Clint Hooppaw, Mayor • ITEM: 4.C. ..... :�. Appleil COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 8, 2022 Valley SECTION: Consent Agenda Description: Adopt Resolution Accepting Donation from Dakota County Heroes for Use by Apple Valley Police Department K-9 Program Staff Contact: Department/ Division: Greg Dahlstrom, Deputy Police Chief Police Department ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached resolution accepting a donation of$3,099.00 from Dakota County Heroes to purchase a ballistic vest for police K9 Bergil. SUMMARY: In November of 2022, Dakota County Heroes accomplished their fundraising goal for K9 Bergil's ballistic vest. They have donated the total amount needed to acquire the vest. BACKGROUND: Dakota County Heroes is a local non-profit organization committed to supporting first responders in Dakota County. In 2022, they began raising funds purchase ballistic vests for local police K9 teams. Since June, they have raised over $9,000 and have pledged to raise funds until all Dakota County K9 officers are equipped with a ballistic vest. BUDGET IMPACT: The impact is positive. The department will be able to purchase the ballistic vest without modification to our original 2022 request. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution CITY OF APPLE VALLEY RESOLUTION 2022- A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING DONATION TO POLICE DEPARTMENT WHEREAS, the City Council of Apple Valley encourages public donations to help defray the costs to the general public of providing services in Apple Valley; and WHEREAS, Dakota County Heroes is a local 501(c)3 who is committed to supporting first responders in Dakota County. In 2022, they began raising funds purchase ballistic vests for local police K9 teams. Since June, they have raised over $9,000 and have pledged raise funds until all Dakota County K9 officers are equipped with a ballistic vest. WHEREAS, In November of 2022, Dakota County Heroes presented a check for $3,099 to the Police Department for the purchase of a ballistic vest for K9 Bergil. WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes 465.03 requires that all gifts and donations of real or personal property be accepted only with the adoption of a resolution approved by two-thirds of the members of the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Apple Valley, Dakota County, Minnesota, that the donation is hereby accepted for use by the City. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City sincerely thanks Dakota County Heroes for their generous donation and continued support. ADOPTED this 8th day of December, 2022. Clint Hooppaw, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk • ITEM: 4.D. ..... :�. Appleil COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 8, 2022 Valley SECTION: Consent Agenda Description: Approve Renewal of 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor Licenses for 2023 Staff Contact: Department/ Division: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk City Clerk's Office ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the renewal and issuance of On-Sale and Off-Sale 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor Licenses for 2023 to licensees per the attached list, subject to receipt of the necessary documents. SUMMARY: Applications for 2023 renewal of 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor Licenses have been received from the licensees listed on the attached page. The Police and Fire Department have reviewed the list of licensees and indicate there are no issues which would preclude renewing the licenses. The Finance Department has confirmed these businesses are current with their property taxes. None of the licensees are on the delinquent taxpayers list provided by the Minnesota Department of Revenue as posted on the Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division's website. In addition, the Minnesota Department of Agriculture and the Minnesota Department of Health have not indicated there are any issues. The renewal of licenses may be approved by the Council subject to receipt of the necessary documents and remaining fees which are due by December 15. BACKGROUND: As required by City Ordinance, the City Council held a public hearing on the renewal of On- Sale 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor Licenses on November 22, 2022. No comments were received. BUDGET IMPACT: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Background Material CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 3.2 MALT LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWALS On-Sale 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor: 1. Chipotle Mexican Grill of Colorado, LLC, d/b/a Chipotle Mexican Grill, 7638 150th Street W. 2. Civitali Restaurant Corporation, d/b/a Punch Neapolitan Pizza, 15640 English Avenue, Suite 400 3. D &D of Minnesota, Inc., d/b/a Famous Dave's BBQ Shack, 7593 147th Street W. 4. Ooka Bistro, Inc., d/b/a Ooka, 6520 150th Street W., Suite 400 5. Smashburger Acquisition Minneapolis, LLC, d/b/a Smashburger#1317, 7394 153rd Street W., Suite 100 6. Super World, Inc., d/b/a Super World Buffet, 15050 Cedar Avenue, Suite 111 Off-Sale 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor: 1. Cedar Brook Market, Inc., d/b/a Cedar Brook Market, 12503 Germane Avenue 2. Emperor Twyst, Inc., d/b/a Gardenview Shell, 206 County Road 42 3. Kwik Trip, Inc., d/b/a Kwik Trip#397, 15065 Dodd Boulevard 4. Kwik Trip, Inc., d/b/a Kwik Trip#406, 7545 145th Street W. 5. Kwik Trip, Inc., d/b/a Kwik Trip #421, 14941 Florence Trail 6. Kwik Trip, Inc., d/b/a Kwik Trip#695, 13357 Palomino Drive 7. Lakes Venture, LLC, d/b/a Fresh Thyme Farmers Market, 14880 Florence Trail 8. Northern Tier Retail, LLC, d/b/a Speedway, 15020 Garrett Avenue 9. Supervalu, Inc., d/b/a Cub Foods, 15350 Cedar Avenue 10. Target Corporation, 15150 Cedar Avenue 11. Target Corporation, 15560 Pilot Knob Road 12. Walmart, Inc., d/b/a Walmart#2642, 7835 150th Street W. • ITEM: 4.E. ..... :�. Appleil COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 8, 2022 Valley SECTION: Consent Agenda Description: Adopt Resolution Setting Public Hearing, at 7:00 p.m. on January 12, 2023, for New On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor and Special License for Sunday Liquor Sales, for QRA Enterprise, LLC, d/b/a X-Golf Apple Valley, 7541 148th Street W. Staff Contact: Department/ Division: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk City Clerk's Office ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the resolution setting a public hearing, at 7:00 p.m. on January 12, 2023, on the application for a new On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor and Special License for Sunday Liquor Sales by QRA Enterprise, LLC, d/b/a X-Golf Apple Valley, 7541 148th Street W. SUMMARY: QRA Enterprise, LLC, d/b/a X-Golf Apple Valley, has submitted an application for a On- Sale Intoxicating Liquor and Special License for Sunday Liquor Sales for premises located at 7541 148th Street W. Attached is a resolution authorizing and directing staff to publish a public hearing notice regarding the liquor license application. BACKGROUND: The legal description of the premises is Lot 1, Block 1, Levine Subdivision No. 2. BUDGET IMPACT: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Resolution CITY OF APPLE VALLEY RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION SETTING PUBLIC HEARING ON LICENSE APPLICATION WHEREAS, the City Clerk has advised this Council that an application for"On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor" and"Special License for Sunday Liquor Sales" has been received from QRA Enterprise, LLC, d/b/a X-Golf Apple Valley, on premises located at 7541 148th Street W.; and WHEREAS, City Code Section 111.24 requires the City Council to set and hold a public hearing on such license applications. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Apple Valley, Dakota County, Minnesota, as follows: 1. A public hearing on said application shall be held before this Council at the time, date and place specified in the Notice of Public Hearing attached to this resolution as Exhibit A. 2. As required by the City Code, the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to publish the hearing notice attached, in a timely manner, in the official City newspaper. ADOPTED this 8th day of December, 2022. Clint Hooppaw, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk Exhibit A NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON-SALE & SPECIAL SUNDAY INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION CITY OF APPLE VALLEY NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Apple Valley, Dakota County, Minnesota, will meet at the Municipal Center, 7100 147th Street W., on Thursday, January 12, 2023, at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as possible. The purpose of the meeting will be to hold a public hearing on the application of QRA Enterprise, LLC, d/b/a X-Golf Apple Valley, for"ON-SALE INTOXICATING LIQUOR" and"SPECIAL LICENSE FOR SUNDAY LIQUOR SALES"pursuant to City Code Section 111.22. The business, which will be operated in conjunction with the proposed licenses, is a restaurant located at 7541 148th Street W. The owners of the corporation are: Benjamin Edward Feret Matthew Jon-Judin Brawner Samuel Guy Hinton Dustin Lee Anderson Aaron Jon-Judin Heitzman Bryan Clare Patrick All interested parties will be given an opportunity to be heard at said time and place. DATED this 8th day of December, 2022. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL Pamela J. Gackstetter Apple Valley City Clerk • ITEM: 4.F. ..... :�. Appleil COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 8, 2022 Valley SECTION: Consent Agenda Description: Adopt Resolution Setting Public Hearing, at 7:00 p.m. on January 12, 2023, for New Concessionaire On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor and Special License for Sunday Liquor Sales for SSA Group, LLC, 13000 Zoo Boulevard Staff Contact: Department/ Division: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk City Clerk's Office ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the resolution setting a public hearing, at 7:00 p.m. on January 12, 2023, on the application for a new Concessionaire On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor and Special License for Sunday Liquor Sales, by SSA Group, LLC, 13000 Zoo Boulevard. SUMMARY: SSA Group, LLC, has submitted an application for Concessionaire On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor and Special License for Sunday Liquor Sales for premises located at 13000 Zoo Boulevard. Attached is a resolution authorizing and directing staff to publish a public hearing notice regarding the liquor license application. BACKGROUND: The legal description of this premises is Lot 1, Block 1, Minnesota Zoo Gardens. BUDGET IMPACT: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Resolution CITY OF APPLE VALLEY RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION SETTING PUBLIC HEARING ON LICENSE APPLICATION WHEREAS, the City Clerk has advised this Council that an application for "Concessionaire On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor" and"Special License for Sunday Liquor Sales" has been received from SSA Group, LLC, on premises located at 13000 Zoo Boulevard; and WHEREAS, City Code Section 111.24 requires the City Council to set and hold a public hearing on such license applications. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Apple Valley, Dakota County, Minnesota, as follows: 1. A public hearing on said application shall be held before this Council at the time, date and place specified in the Notice of Public Hearing attached to this resolution as Exhibit A. 2. As required by the City Code, the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to publish the hearing notice attached, in a timely manner, in the official City newspaper. ADOPTED this 8th day of December, 2022. Clint Hooppaw, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk Exhibit A NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CONSESSIONAIRE ON-SALE & SPECIAL SUNDAY INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION CITY OF APPLE VALLEY NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Apple Valley, Dakota County, Minnesota, will meet at the Municipal Center, 7100 147th Street W., on Thursday, January 12, 2023, at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as possible. The purpose of the meeting will be to hold a public hearing on the application of SSA Group, LLC, for"CONSESSIONAIRE ON-SALE INTOXICATING LIQUOR" and"SPECIAL LICENSE FOR SUNDAY LIQUOR SALES"pursuant to City Code Section 111.22. The business, which will be operated in conjunction with the proposed licenses, is a restaurant located at 7541 148th Street W. The officers of the corporation are: Sean Kevin McNicholas - Owner, President, CEO Shannon Katy Mary Fitzgerald- Owner, Chief Brand Officer, Secretary Brendan Patrick McNicholas - Owner Wells Fargo Central Pacific Holdings, Inc. - Owner All interested parties will be given an opportunity to be heard at said time and place. DATED this 8th day of December, 2022. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL Pamela J. Gackstetter Apple Valley City Clerk • ITEM: 4.G. ..... Appleil COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 8, 2022 Valley SECTION: Consent Agenda Description: Adopt Resolution Establishing Precinct Boundaries and Polling Places for 2023 Elections Staff Contact: Department/ Division: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk City Clerk's Office ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the resolution establishing the precinct boundaries and polling places for 2023 elections. SUMMARY: State law requires cities to designate its precinct boundaries and polling places by December 1 in the year prior to the year of a state General Election, by December 31 of each year prior to a year when an election is not anticipated, and not less than 90 days prior to an election if a new polling place is designated. Attached is a resolution establishing the precinct boundaries and polling places for 2023. There there are no proposed changes to the precinct boundaries or polling location addresses since the 2022 General Election. BACKGROUND: Minn. Stat. 204B.14, Subd. 4, states in part that any change in the boundary of an election precinct must be adopted at least ten weeks before the date of the next election and, for the state Primary and General Election or Presidential Nomination Primary, no later than December 1 in the year prior to the year of a state General Election. Minn. Stat. 204B.16, Subd. 1, states in part that by December 31 of each year, the governing body of each municipality must designate by ordinance or resolution a polling place for each election precinct. The polling places designated in the ordinance or resolution are the polling places for the following year. Minn. Stat. 204B.16, Subd. 3, states in part that the designation of a polling place shall remain effective until a different polling place is designated for that precinct, and no designation of a new or different polling place shall become effective less than 90 days prior to an election. BUDGET IMPACT: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Resolution CITY OF APPLE VALLEY RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING ELECTION PRECINCT BOUNDARIES AND POLLING PLACES FOR 2023 ELECTIONS BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Apple Valley, Dakota County, Minnesota, that upon adoption of this resolution and until subsequent amendment, the following precinct boundaries and polling places are hereby established for the City's election precincts: Precinct No. Polling Place Precinct Boundaries 1 Revival Baptist Church The area bounded by County Road 42 on the 964 Garden View Drive north, to Pennock Lane on the east, to Whitney Drive on the south, to Garden View Drive on the east, to 160th Street W. on the south, to the west City boundary. 2 Apple Valley Senior Center The area bounded by County Road 42 on the north, 14601 Hayes Road to Cedar Avenue on the east, to 160th Street W. on the south, to Garden View Drive on the west, to Whitney Drive on the north, to Pennock Lane on the west. 3 Redwood Community Center The area bounded by 140th Street W. on the north, 311 - 150th Street W. to Garden View Drive on the east, to 143rd Street W. on the north, to Hayes Road on the east, to County Road 42 on the south, to the west City boundary. 4 Apple Valley Community Center The area bounded by 140th Street W. on the north, 14603 Hayes Road to Cedar Avenue on the east, to County Road 42 on the south, to Hayes Road on the west, to 143rd Street W. on the south, to Garden View Drive on the west. 5 Bethel's Rock Church The area bounded by the northwest City boundary, 14201 Cedar Avenue to Highway 77 on the east, to McAndrews Road on the north, to Galaxie Avenue on the east, to Upper 136th Street W. on the south, to Highway 77 Service Road on the east, crossing Cedar Avenue, to 138th Street W. on the south, to Pennock Avenue on the west, to McAndrews Road on the south, to Garden View Drive on the west, and continuing on the boundary between Independent School Districts 191 and 196 on the west. Precinct No. Polling Place Precinct Boundaries 6 Education Partnership Building The area bounded by 140th Street W. on the north, 14200 Cedar Avenue to Galaxie Avenue on the east, to 160th Street W. on the south, to Cedar Avenue on the west. 7 Shepherd of the Valley Lutheran The area bounded by the north City boundary, to Church Johnny Cake Ridge Road on the east, to 132nd 12650 Johnny Cake Ridge Road Street W. on the south, to Galaxie Avenue on the west, to McAndrews Road on the south, to Highway 77 on the west. 8 Greenleaf Elementary School The area bounded by 132nd Street W. on the north, 13333 Galaxie Avenue to Johnny Cake Ridge Road on the east, to 140th Street W. on the south, to Cedar Avenue on the west, to Highway 77 Service Road on the west, to Upper 136th Street W. on the north, to Galaxie Avenue on the west. 9 Community of Christ Church The area bounded by McAndrews Road on the 5990 - 134th Street Court north to the east City boundary, and continuing south on Diamond Path to 144th Street W. on the south, to Pilot Knob Road on the west. 10 South Suburban Evangelical Free The area bounded by the north City boundary, to Church the east City boundary, to McAndrews Road on the 12600 Johnny Cake Ridge Road south, to Pilot Knob Road on the east, to 140th Street W. on the south, to Johnny Cake Ridge Road on the west. 11 ISD 196 District Service Center The area bounded by 144th Street W. on the north, 14301 Diamond Path to Diamond Path on the east, to County Road 42 on the south, to Pilot Knob Road on the west. 12 Spirit of Life Presbyterian Church The area bounded by 140th Street W. on the north, 14401 Pilot Knob Road to Pilot Knob Road on the east, to County Road 42 on the south, to Flagstaff Avenue on the east, to 153rd Street W. on the south, to Galaxie Avenue on the west. 2 Precinct No. Polling Place Precinct Boundaries 13 Johnny Cake Activity Center The area bounded by County Road 42 on the 14255 Johnny Cake Ridge Road north, to Diamond Path on the east, to 158th Street W. on the south, to Diamond Way on the west, and continuing west and south on Diamond Way to 158th Street W. on the south, to Cobblestone Lake Parkway on the west, and continuing west on Cobblestone Lake Parkway to Eagle Bay Drive on the west, to 155th Street W. on the south, to Pilot Knob Road on the west. 14 Apple Valley Municipal Center The area bounded by 153rd Street W. on the north, 7100 - 147th Street W. to Flagstaff Avenue on the east, to 157th Street W. on the north, to Finch Avenue on the east, to 160th Street W. on the south, to Galaxie Avenue on the west. 15 River Valley Church The area bounded by County Road 42 on the north, 14898 Energy Way to Pilot Knob Road on the east, to 155th Street W. on the north, to Eagle Bay Drive on the east, to Cobblestone Lake Parkway on the north, and continuing south on Cobblestone Lake Parkway to 158th Street W. on the north, to Diamond Way on the west, and continuing east and south on Diamond Way to 158th Street W. on the north, to Diamond Path on the east, to 160th Street W. on the south, to Finch Avenue on the west, to 157th Street W. on the south, to Flagstaff Avenue on the west. 16 Hope Church The area bounded by the northwest City boundary, 7477 - 145th Street W. to the boundary between Independent School Districts 191 and 196 on the east, continuing to Garden View Drive on the east, to McAndrews Road on the north, to Pennock Avenue on the east, to 138th Street W. on the north, to Cedar Avenue on the east, to 140th Street W. on the south, to the west City boundary. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk shall post a copy of this resolution pursuant to M.S. 204B.14, and shall file maps showing the precinct boundaries with the County Treasurer-Auditor, the Secretary of State, and the School Districts, if a precinct boundary has been changed. 3 DATED this 8th day of December, 2022. Clint Hooppaw, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk CERTIFICATE I, the undersigned,being the duly qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of Apple Valley, Dakota County, Minnesota, hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a resolution presented to and adopted by the City Council of Apple Valley at a duly authorized meeting thereof held in the City of Apple Valley, Minnesota, on the 8th day of December, 2022, the original of which is in my possession. (SEAL) Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk 4 • ITEM: 4.H. ..... :�. Apple COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 8, 2022 Valley SECTION: Consent Agenda Description: 2023 City Council Meeting Schedule Staff Contact: Department/ Division: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk City Clerk's Office ACTION REQUESTED: 1. Set the 2023 City Council regular meeting schedule, in accordance with adopted policy, on the second and fourth Thursdays of each month. 2. Set a special informal meeting on April 14, 2023, at 8:30 a.m. at Valleywood Golf and Events, 4851 McAndrews Road. SUMMARY: In accordance with current policy, following is the tentative schedule of regular City Council meetings for the year 2023. Typically, regular meetings begin at 7:00 p.m. and informal meetings begin at 5:30 p.m. prior to the first regular meeting of each month and are held at the Municipal Center. To accommodate the League of Minnesota Cities Annual Conference, the second meeting in June has been canceled. 5:30 p.m. 7:00 p.m. Informal Meetings Regular Meetings Jan 12 Jan 12 26 Feb 9 Feb 9 23 Mar 9 Mar 9 23 Apr 13 Apr 13 27 May 11 May 11 25 June 8 June 8 * July 13 July 13 27 Aug 10 Aug 10 24 Sept 14 Sept 14 28 Oct 12 Oct 12 26 Nov 9 Nov 9 21 Tuesday Dec 14 Dec 14 28 In addition, staff recommends the City Council set a special informal meeting for the purposes of conducting the annual goal setting session on April 14, 2023, at 8:30 a.m., at Valleywood Golf and Events. BACKGROUND: Regular Meeting Date Criteria Per Adopted Policy: • Agenda packet preparation will take place on Mondays preceding regular Council meetings unless it is a holiday or the meeting is on Tuesday. If the Council meeting is on a Tuesday, the agenda packet preparation will take place on the preceding Friday. • Regular Council meetings will be held on the second and fourth Thursdays unless that or the following Friday is a holiday; in which case, the Council will meet on Tuesday of that week. BUDGET IMPACT: N/A • ••• ITEM: 4.1. ..... .... Apple COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 8, 2022 Valley SECTION: Consent Agenda Description: Adopt Resolution Adopting Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan Staff Contact: Department/ Division: Deputy Chief Greg Dahlstrom Police Department ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the resolution to adopt the Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan. SUMMARY: Keeping our residents safe when disaster strikes is important to the City of Apple Valley. The Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 requires counties and cities to prepare All-Hazard Mitigation Plans every five years. Plans must address potential natural and manmade hazards and develop mitigation strategies to reduce the impacts of hazard events both in dollars and lives saved. Counties and cities must have an approved and adopted plan to be eligible for both federal disaster relief and mitigation project grant dollars. The plan is included in the City Council packet. The portion specific to Apple Valley can be found on pages 147-153. BACKGROUND: The first All-Hazard Mitigation Plan was approved by the Minnesota Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management (HSEM) and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in 2006. Since early 2020, City staff has been working with Dakota County Emergency Management to coordinate the required 5-year update to the All- Hazard Mitigation Plan. The City has participated in the planning process and developed its own mitigation strategies as part of the multi jurisdictional plan. In February 2022, the Dakota County Board of Commissioners authorized release of the draft plan for a formal 45-day public review and comment period, from Feb. 23 to April 8, 2022. Comments received were addressed in the plan. It was submitted to Minnesota Homeland Security and Emergency Management and the Federal Emergency Management Agency for review. County staff received HSEM comments and incorporated them into the Plan. No public comments were received after posting the Plan on the County's website. No public hearing is required under the federal guidance documents. The plan was revised based on state and federal reviewer comments and received state and federal conditional approval in August 2022. The County Board of Commissioners formally approved and adopted the 2022 update to the All-Hazard Mitigation Plan in late September 2022. City staff worked collaboratively to update the plan to ensure that our city remains eligible to receive future federal funds if a disaster occurs. The final draft of the Plan is posted on the Dakota County web site at: https://www co.dakota.mn.us/HealthFamily/HandlingEmergencies/Planning/Pages/all- hazard.aspx. According to FEMA rules, cities must formally adopt the Plan within one year of its approval to be covered by the Plan. This is required in order for the City to secure federal Disaster Public Assistance and Mitigation Grants for communities in case of a disaster. Prior to receipt of the City's resolution adopting the Plan federal disaster funds will not be available. The work on this project does not end with adoption of the Plan. As a method to keep the Plan at the forefront, the implementation of the mitigation strategies outlined in the Plan will be monitoring during meetings of the Dakota County Domestic Preparedness Committee JPA. BUDGET IMPACT: No immediate impact. However, the City must have an approved and adopted plan to be eligible for both federal disaster relief and mitigation project grant dollars. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit Resolution DAKOTA COUNTY, M I N N ESOTA ALL-HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2022 7 '. - ice' r I ' . ill ii I. lii14,;4,-. - I i I 4 - � .!t Av. ��-.' •.1 .. wa •^ •4._= 7!« , • r• .'" - COUNTcgs4q4‘ Y Final Draft for Board Consideration of Adoption August 8, 2022 DAKOTA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Mike Slavik, District 1 Liz Workman, District 5 Kathleen Gaylord, District 2 Mary Liz Holberg, District 6 Laurie Halvorson, District 3 Mary Hamann-Roland, District 7 Joe Atkins, District 4 DAKOTA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Dennis Peine, District 1 Ram Singh, District 5 Jerry Rich, District 1 Robert Timmerman, District 5 Lori Hansen, District 2 Nate Reitz, District 6 Jill Smith, District 3 Jim Guttmann, District 6 Greg Oxley, District 3 Anthony Nelson, District 7 Amy Hunting, District 4 Donald Post, District Barry Graham, District 4 PLANNING TEAM B.J. Battig, Dakota County Risk Management-Homeland Security Ben Rutter, Dakota County Risk Management-Homeland Security Jim Iliff, Dakota County Sheriff's Office Doug Nelson, Dakota County Sheriff's Office Mary Jackson, Dakota County Office of Planning Kurt Chatfield, Dakota County Office of Planning Mary Hagerman, Dakota County Office of GIS Scott Laursen, Dakota County Office of GIS Aaron Sather, Dakota County Physical Development Administration Alex Saxe, Dakota County Physical Development Administration The Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan was conditionally approved by FEMA on August 4, 2022 and adopted by the County Board on . This plan is valid until its expiration in . Cover Photo: Propane Explosion and Fire, 1974-West Saint Paul (Dakota County Historical Society) DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 CONTENTS SECTION I—INTRODUCTION 1 Planning Authority and Guidance 1 Planning Vision and Goals 1 Recent Hazard Declarations 1 Participating Jurisdictions 2 Plan Adoption 3 Relationship to Emergency Operations Plan 3 2021 Update 3 Hazards Profiled in 2021 2 Organization of this Plan 2 SECTION II -THE PLANNING PROCESS 5 Summary 5 Community Participation 6 Interagency Participation 7 Related Plans, Studies, Reports, and Technical Information 9 Plan Implementation 10 Plan Evaluation 10 Plan Updates 11 Continued Public Involvement 11 SECTION III -COMMUNITY PROFILE 13 Section Overview 13 General County Overview 14 Physical Characteristics 15 Land Cover and Use 25 Future Land Use 27 Community Infrastructure 29 Transportation 33 Energy, Utilities, Communication Infrastructure 39 Demographic and Economic Conditions 41 Public Safety and Emergency Response Capabilities 45 Vulnerable Populations 47 SECTION IV- HAZARDS FACING THE COMMUNITY 49 Natural Hazards in Dakota County 51 Technological and Human-Induced Hazards in Dakota County 81 SECTION V—DAKOTA COUNTY VULNERABILITIES 101 Hazard Rankings 101 Vulnerability 104 Potential Losses 107 SECTION VI —DAKOTA COUNTY GOALS AND STRATEGIES 119 Communications and Education Goals 120 Natural Disaster Mitigation Goals 121 Technological and Human-Induced Disaster Mitigation Goals 130 Implementation 141 SECTION VII: PARTICIPATING CITY RISKS,STRATEGIES,AND PRIORITIES 145 Overview 145 City Of Apple Valley 147 City Of Burnsville 154 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 City Of Coates 162 City Of Eagan 167 City Of Farmington 174 City Of Hampton 181 City Of Hastings 187 City Of Inver Grove Heights 195 City Of Lakeville 202 City Of Lilydale 209 City Of Mendota 215 City Of Mendota Heights 221 City Of Miesville 228 City Of New Trier 233 City Of Randolph 238 City Of Rosemount 244 City Of South St. Paul 251 City Of Sunfish Lake 257 City Of Vermillion 263 City Of West St. Paul 269 Dakota County Fire Chiefs Association 278 APPENDIX I: RESOLUTIONS OF PARTICIPATION AND ADOPTION 279 APPENDIX II. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT FINDINGS 281 Online Survey 281 Intercepts 285 APPENDIX III -2021 PROGRESS ON 2016 PLAN STRATEGIES 287 Dakota County 287 Cities in Dakota County 291 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 SECTION I — INTRODUCTION Planning Authority and Guidance Section 322 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (Stafford Act),42 U.S.C. 5165, as amended by the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000), Public Law 106-390, requires states,tribes, and local governments to undertake a risk-based approach to reducing exposure to natural disasters through mitigation planning. As authorized by DMA 2000,the Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA) established criteria for state and local hazard mitigation planning through Rule 44, Part 201 of the Federal Code of Regulations (CFR). This plan has been prepared in accordance with CFR 44 requirements. In Minnesota, federal regulatory authority for hazard mitigation planning resides with FEMA Region V. Guidance developed by the Minnesota Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management (MN HSEM) and the Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA), have been invaluable resources for establishing the scope, planning process, assessment methods, and content of this all-hazard plan. Plan Update CFR 44§201.6(d)(3) directs the update and re-submittal of Local Mitigation Plans every five (5)years in order to continue eligibility for FEMA hazard assistance programs. First adopted in 2006, this plan was updated in 2011, 2016, and 2021. This plan has been updated under the direction of the Dakota County Board of Commissioners and the Dakota County Manager. Planning Vision and Goals Dakota County Hazard Mitigation Vision: Dakota County will work with its jurisdictions, surrounding communities, and relief organizations to create and implement an all-hazard mitigation plan to lessen the impact disasters have on life and property. The update of this plan encompassed three major goals: 1. Reduce Hazard Risks and Impacts—Assess the vulnerability of life and property to a broad range of natural and technological hazards and present a prioritized range of corresponding mitigation strategies to reduce risks and lessen impacts. 2. Build on Existing Efforts—Dakota County's cities, county departments,townships, school districts, and businesses are already engaged in mitigation, preparedness, and response planning. Maximize these efforts by coordinating and building upon these efforts when possible and incorporate/reference information and strategies from existing emergency response plans and other relevant efforts. 3. Share Information and Raise Awareness—Seek input from a diverse range of stakeholders including the general public and various municipal, business, and non-profit sector representatives. Mitigation strategies in this plan propose to enhance public awareness of hazards, public mitigation efforts, and individual responsibilities in reducing the risk and impacts of hazards on personal safety and property. Recent Hazard Declarations Six federal disasters have been declared in Dakota County since the 2016 Plan update: severe storms and flooding in 2016, severe storms/tornadoes/straight-line winds/flooding and severe storms/flooding in 2018, severe storms/tornadoes/straight-line winds/flooding and spring flooding in 2019 and the on- going COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. Statewide, disasters between 2000 and 2020 cost roughly$340 Page 1 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 million in Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA) public assistance, largely attributable to severe summer storms and flooding. Table 1.1: Minnesota Major Disaster Declarations:2000-2020 ID# Date Event MN Public Dakota Co. Assistance Public Assistance DR-1333 6/27/2000 Severe Storms $11,738,304 $121,904 DR-1370 5/16/2001 Floods $36,227,572 $4,700,728 DR-1419 6/14/2002 Floods/Severe Storms/Tornadoes $26,435,703 N/A DR-1569 10/7/2004 Severe Storms/Flooding $4,045,561 N/A DR-1622 1/4/2006 Severe Winter Storm $8,177,519 N/A DR-1648 6/5/2006 Flooding $7,012,366 N/A DR-1717 8/23/2007 Severe Storms/Flooding $31,229,991 N/A DR-1772 6/25/2008 Severe Storms/Flooding $6,361,369 N/A DR-1830 4/9/2009 Severe Storms/Flooding $29,675,994 N/A DR-1900 4/19/2010 Flooding $12,764,838 N/A DR-1921 7/2/2010 Severe Storms/Flooding $13,399,002 N/A DR-1941 10/13/2010 Severe Storms/Flooding $26,092,574 N/A DR-1982 05/10/2011 Severe Storms/Flooding $20,678,190 N/A DR-1990 06/07/2011 Severe Storms/Tornadoes $4,185,337 N/A DR-4009 7/28/2011 Severe Storms/Flooding/Tornadoes $11,672,989 N/A DR-4069 7/6/2012 Severe Storms/Flooding $44,475,991 $2,383,530 DR-4113 5/3/2013 Severe Winter Storm $10,877,669 N/A DR-4131 7/25/2013 Severe Storms/Straight-line Winds/Flooding $14,074,708 N/A DR-4182 07/21/2014 Severe Storms/Straight-line Winds/ $41,108,909 N/A Flooding/Landslides/Mudslides MN-2014- 6/1 7/11/2014 Severe Storms/Straight-line Winds/ N/A $1,448,811 002* Flooding/Landslides/Mudslides DR-4290 9/21-9/24/2016 Severe Storms/Flooding $7,013,278 N/A Severe Storms/Tornadoes/Straight-line DR-4390 6/15-7/12/2018 Winds/Flooding N/A N/A DR-4414 10/9-10/11/2018 Severe Storms/Flooding N/A N/A DR-4442 3/12-4/28/2019 Severe Winter Storm/Straight-line N/A N/A Winds/Flooding SD-036 3/12-4/28/2019 Spring Flooding N/A N/A DR 4531, 1/20/20—Ongoing Minnesota COVID-19 Pandemic N/A N/A EM-3453 Total Public Agency Assistance $340,812,161 $8,654,973 Sources: MN Homeland Security and Emergency Management, Public Assistance Disaster Workbook—County Public Assistance Totals; FEMA Online database for remaining information,www.fema.gov. *State of Minnesota Disaster Assistance Program. Dates reflect incident period. Participating Jurisdictions This plan was prepared as a multi-jurisdictional plan to cover Dakota County, Minnesota and the cities and townships located therein. With the exception of Northfield, MN, each municipality participated in the planning process. Northfield (pop. 20k) is predominantly located in Rice County and will be covered under the Rice County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan. Page 2 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Participating Cities Apple Valley Hastings Mendota Heights Sunfish Lake Burnsville Inver Grove Miesville Vermillion Coates Heights New Trier West St. Paul Eagan Lakeville Randolph Farmington Lilydale Rosemount Hampton Mendota South St. Paul Unincorporated Townships Covered under the County Plan Castle Rock Greenvale Randolph Waterford Douglas Hampton Ravenna Empire Marshan Sciota Eureka Nininger Vermillion Plan Adoption This plan will be considered to be in effect upon adoption by the Dakota County Board of Commissioners, subsequent to approval by the Minnesota Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management (MN HSEM) and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). As a multi-jurisdictional plan, each participating jurisdiction is also required to adopt the final version of this plan. Please see Appendix I - Resolutions of Support and Adoption. Relationship to Emergency Operations Plan Dakota County has prepared an Emergency Operations Plan (EOP), which is updated annually, as part of an overall preparedness strategy. The EOP addresses tactical response and mutual aid at the time of an emergency event. This All-Hazard Mitigation Plan update complements the EOP through seeking to reduce risks and impacts on a pre-event basis in these strategic areas: ■ Enhancing structural protection measures for new construction ■ Retrofitting of existing facilities for enhanced structural integrity ■ Acquiring repetitive loss structures ■ Developing mitigation standards, regulations, policies, and programs ■ Reviewing, updating, and enforcing building/zoning codes ■ Increasing public awareness and education programs ■ Developing and improving warning systems 2022 Update This multi-jurisdiction plan is an update of the 2016 All-Hazard Mitigation Plan. New demographic, community profile, and hazard information has been incorporated. Maps and charts have been updated to reflect recent changes in infrastructure, demographics, and land use. Participating jurisdictions (cities) played an increased role in the 2016 update and this update. The County and each city developed hazard ratings for their own community, evaluated their community's vulnerabilities, and considered and selected a range of mitigation strategies relevant to their particular situation. The County and participating cities also have identified local resources, programs, and efforts by which mitigation strategies will be implemented. This plan update reports the progress in local mitigation efforts over the past five years. The status of 2016 action items presented in Appendix Ill— 2016 All-Hazard Mitigation Plan Progress. Page 3 D RAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Hazards Profiled in 2021 Hazard profiling was a first step in updating this plan. Based on events since the 2016 plan and new concerns, Civil Disturbance was considered in partnership with cities and included as a hazard in 2021. Table 1.2 Hazards Profiled Hazard Reason for Identification Civil Disturbance Recent occurrences, likely adverse impact, increasing threat Cyber-Attack Frequency, likely adverse impact, increasing threat Dam Failure Likely adverse impact,geographic extent Drought Likely adverse impact,geographic extent Extreme Temperatures Frequency,geographic extent Flash Flood Likely adverse impact,frequency, Hazardous Material Incidents Likely adverse impact,frequency Infectious Disease Likely adverse impact,geographic extent Landslide Frequency, likely adverse impact,occurrence in 2014 Overland Flood Likely adverse impact,geographic extent Structural Fire Frequency, likely adverse impact Terrorism Likely adverse impact Tornado Frequency, likely adverse impact Violent Summer Storms Frequency, likely adverse impact,geographic extent Violent Winter Storms Frequency, likely adverse impact,geographic extent Wastewater Treatment Plant Failure Likely adverse impact,geographic extent Water Supply Contamination Likely adverse impact Wildfire Frequency The following hazards were not profiled in this plan due to the lack of previous occurrences or low potential for damage in the planning area. Table 1.3 Hazards Not Profiled Hazard Reason for Omission Avalanche Geographic proximity Coastal Erosion Geographic proximity Earthquake Low occurrence Expansive Soils Low vulnerability Land Subsidence Low vulnerability Tsunami Geographic proximity Volcano Geographic proximity Organization of this Plan This plan is organized into the following sections and content areas: Section 1—Introduction: Identifies the legal authority under which the plan was prepared, sets forth the planning vision and goals related to hazard mitigation, and identifies the cities actively participating in plan development. Section 2—Planning Process Overview: Describes the overall process used for updating the plan, how the community was engaged, and the relationship of the All-Hazard Mitigation Plan to other existing plans, such as the Emergency Operations Plan. Provides information on how the plan will be evaluated and updated over time. Page 2 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Section 3—Community Profiles: Describes the County through its physical characteristics, land uses, critical community infrastructure, demographic composition, response capabilities, and vulnerable populations. Section 4—Hazards Facing the Community: Describes each natural or manmade hazard of concern in Dakota County and provides a summary of locations and occurrence histories. Evaluates countywide vulnerability to each hazard and provides an overview of existing plans or programs to address each hazard. Section 5—Dakota County Vulnerabilities: Provides a ranking of hazard concern at a countywide level and describes vulnerable populations and infrastructure. Section 6—Strategies and Priorities: Establishes County goals and strategies for each hazard area and discusses implementation processes and roles. Section 7—Participating Cities Risks,Strategies,and Priorities: For each of the participating cities, identifies hazards of concern,general land use, vulnerable populations and infrastructure, and key changes since the 2016 plan. Sets forth each city's strategies for addressing hazard vulnerabilities and discusses implementation processes and roles. Appendix I—Resolutions of Support and Adoption from Participating Cities Appendix II—Public Survey and Engagement Results,2021 Appendix Ill—2016 Plan Progress Review for County-and City-Led Strategies Page 3 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 This page intentionally blank. Page 4 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 SECTION II - THE PLANNING PROCESS Requirement§201.6(c)(1): [The plan shall document] the planning process used to develop the plan, including how it was prepared, who was involved in the process, and how the public was involved. Summary Dakota County staff coordinated this plan update with assistance from the representatives of participating jurisdictions, who provided time, experience, perspective, and expertise. This update completes the prior five-year All-Hazard Mitigation planning cycle (2016-2021) and initiates the next five-year planning cycle (2021-2026). Table 1 summarizes the plan update process, which began in late 2020 with organization of the effort (Start-Up). The first three quarters of 2021 focused on engaging participant communities and stakeholders to assess hazards and vulnerabilities, develop mitigation actions, and prepare the plan document (Update Plan). The fourth quarter of 2021 and first quarter of 2022 focused on plan review and adoption. Because of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, engagement methods relied more on virtual meetings instead of in-person events. Table 2.1 Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Planning Process,2020-2021 Key Tasks Start-up:4th Quarter, 2020 • Organized AHMP Planning Team including municipal participation • Reviewed FEMA and HSEM requirements • Defined tasks and timelines,sought cooperation from participating departments • Requested county and city leadership support for planning effort • Developed city engagement approach and requested resolutions of participation from member cities • Developed public engagement strategies and project communication plan New Strategies,Update Plan: 1st to 3rd Quarters, 2021 • Provided plan update information to townships covered under the County Plan • Updated the County Board of Commissioners and Planning Commission (citizen advisory committee) • Met with County departments to track status of current mitigation actions and update strategies • Updated website,developed-promoted online public survey on concerns, priorities,and preparedness • Met with participating cities on 2016 Plan progress,vulnerabilities,and new strategies. • Updated plan data and GIS maps • Completed City and County level hazard and vulnerability assessments • Engaged public through flyers at vaccination clinics, library intercept displays,and information at the County Fair • Drafted City and County mitigation strategies/actions,developed draft plan Plan Review and Adoption:4th Quarter,2021,early 2022 • Updated the County Board and Planning Commission on new strategies,opened public review • Submitted draft plan to MN HSEM/FEMA for technical pre-review • Public comment on draft plan: media releases, plan online and at libraries, public intercepts • Revision of draft addressing HSEM, FEMA,and public comments • Final submittal to MN HSEM/FEMA • Formal adoption of plan by County and Cities Page 5 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Community Participation A variety of methods engaged participating cities,townships covered under the County Plan, citizen advisory committees, people who live or work in the County, and other stakeholders. Participating Cities Municipalities played the lead role in reviewing progress made on their strategies from the 2016 plan, assessing hazards and vulnerabilities relevant to their own jurisdictions, developing prioritized strategies to address their concerns, and identifying implementation mechanisms. Through group meetings and workshops,jurisdictions assessed hazards and vulnerabilities and considered and prioritized a range of mitigation strategies. Mitigation plan requirements developed since the 2011 Dakota County plan update were identified from the current FEMA Mitigation Plan Crosswalk and built into a template to assist participating cities in developing required plan content for their communities during the 2016 and 2021 updates. Templates were sent to designated contacts in all participating jurisdictions in 2021, requesting the following: CITY PLANNING TEMPLATE: Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan Update 2021 A] Plan Participation 1. City Resolution of participation 2. Point of contact from the City to participate in the Plan update B] Plan Content to Update for the City of 1. Hazard identification and rating for your city using the County's four-point rating scale for frequency, warning time,geographic extent, likely impact. Matrix included. 2. Identify Changes,Additions to Critical Facilities,such as new public gathering areas,schools, etc. The plan must include descriptions of development in hazard-prone areas since the 2016 Plan update. 3. Rate the Vulnerabilities of Critical Assets to each hazard of concern (Y/N/NA). Matrix included. 4. Identify mitigation implementation resources:departments, roles,and specific tools such as ordinances and programs. 5. Document participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)and how the City maintains compliance. C] Report Progress on 2016 Plan strategies D] Develop New City Strategies for 2022 Plan Update 1. Identify carryover strategies from 2016 plan with the primary position responsible for implementation. 2. Include strategy that identifies and analyzes a comprehensive range of strategies,which were selected, and the primary position responsible for implementation. 3. Include at least one strategy to reduce risk to buildings and infrastructure. 4. Identify new strategies to address vulnerabilities and concerns. E] Prioritize Strategies and Identify Implementation Processes 1. Prioritize strategies using modified County criteria 2. Document how strategies will be implemented. Required plan content received from each city is presented in Section VI—City Risks, Strategies, and Priorities. The draft of this plan was made available to all cities for review and comment. During the five-year life of this plan, individual jurisdictions will be responsible for evaluating and reporting the status of their own mitigation actions. The following city representatives participated in developing and updating plan content. One-on-one sessions or calls were held with cities through the summer of 2021. All cities were consulted in the course of the plan update. Page 6 D RAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 City Contact and Position Apple Valley: Greg Dahlstrom, Police Department Captain Burnsville: Patrick Gast, Police Department Sergeant Coates: Sherri Leflay, Clerk Eagan: Jeremy Klein, Emergency Manager Farmington: Gary Rutherford, Chief of Police Hampton: John Knetter, Council Member Hastings: Dave Wilske, Chief of Police Inver Grove Heights: Joshua Otis, Police Department Commander Lakeville: Mike Meyer, Fire Chief Lilydale: Mary Schultz, City Administrator Mendota: Steve Golias, Council Member Mendota Heights: Kelly McCarthy, Chief of Police Miesville: Terri McCarthy, Clerk New Trier: Brenda Leifeld, Clerk and Nicole Peine, Mayor Randolph: Mary Haro, Clerk Rosemount: Mikael Dahlstrom, Chief of Police South St. Paul: Bill Messerich, Chief of Police Sunfish Lake: Brian Sturgeon, Chief of Police Vermillion: Lisa Rowan, Clerk West St. Paul: Brian Sturgeon, Chief of Police Township Participation Dakota County's unincorporated townships are covered under the County's planning and mitigation efforts. County staff provided an overview of the Hazard Mitigation Plan update at the Rural Township Association meeting on March 20, 2021. Additional information was sent to townships on the draft plan strategies, and the draft plan was made available to all townships during the public review period. Interagency Participation A joint powers agreement between Dakota County and its eleven major cities established the Dakota County Preparedness Committee (DPC)for the purpose of maintaining response capability for large- scale disasters and emergencies. The DPC comprises of local government emergency coordinators and representatives from Dakota County's hospitals and clinics (Regina Medical Center, Northfield Hospital, and Allina Clinic). Throughout the planning process, the DPC has served as a forum to discuss potential ways to mitigate risk from natural and man-made disasters. In addition to emergency preparation,the DPC is also charged with maintaining a Critical Infrastructure Key Resources (CIKR) list of vital assets, systems, and networks located in Dakota County. Because many of these facilities are privately held,the DPC will continue to partner with local businesses to address risk and security. Updates on the 2021 All-Hazard Plan update were provided to the DPC at several points in the process. Neighboring Communities, Non-profit, and Business Participation A draft copy of this plan was made available for neighboring counties to review and provide their comments for the final draft of this plan. Dakota County cooperates with neighboring counties on several on-going mitigation actions including flood monitoring(Rice County,Scott County) and dam safety(Goodhue County). Page 7 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Draft plan copies were made available to local chambers of commerce to solicit feedback from local business and non-profits for comments to include in the final draft of this plan. Apple Valley Chamber of Commerce Hastings Chamber of Commerce Burnsville Chamber of Commerce Lakeville Chamber of Commerce Dakota County Regional Foundation River Heights Chamber of Commerce Conversations with representatives of disaster relief organizations were held during the preparation and review of this plan. A vital resource in the event of a disaster,the Red Cross coordinates relief through partnerships with local businesses and government organizations. • The Red Cross and Dakota County Social Services continue to plan for the provision of emergency shelter should a disaster displace residents from their homes. • The Red Cross supports Dakota County Public Health and local municipalities in developing plans for the mass dispensing of antibiotics and vaccines. Community Engagement 44 CFR Requirement 201.6(b):An open public involvement process is essential to the development of an effective plan. In order to develop a more comprehensive approach to reducing the effects of natural disasters,the planning process shall include: (1)an opportunity for the public to comment on the plan during the drafting stage and prior to plan approval. Public involvement gives citizens, local businesses, and community organizations the opportunity to learn more about hazard mitigation,voice their concerns, and suggest actions. It also builds strong support for future mitigation activities. For these reasons, public participation was a key component of the AHMP planning processes. Opportunities for involvement are summarized below. Website The county website (see below), municipal websites, municipal notices,flyers at County COVID-19 Vaccination Clinics, intercept displays at County Libraries, a staffed booth at the County Fair and targeted outreach to Community Liaisons promoted ways in which residents could contribute to the planning process. Public comment was accepted throughout the planning process. Government Home&Property Permits&Licenses Law&Justice Health&Family Environment Transportation ",, : Maps&Duecbprg I Departments I Maul Vs I Cgn{atth Hume.:-...ai... L:iriAmer Mepareurenv Cowurlmeigencywanning Get Immediate Hetp Al I-Hazard Mitigation Plan County Emergency Planning Dak.a Cauntyts grepalrlga Doc uments energei,operaticmnen counties toepare plans Hlat: pr rgenry gapwiserquisu rrmine lwnanuclear .Idenglyreatuial and manmadehaaards that pose a risX stinjWK death o-popertydartmeevs,n •eosbnll-Hazen ` !Aswan fir..Rank She hazards Ity sneriey and likcliheed edtetunenee l Haaerd ldatationwn .Idmtlrvetrdcgns Lo mir.imlecluturerisk bctwc deaskcrsoccu Prepare Yourself&v ur Family the Dakota Cauntyki-Haaard Mitigation Plan covets all tarenehips and cities in Dakota Cmmty It is required to maintain Prepare tee Disasters&Disease Outbreaks enyb li[rPor federal disaster relief andtn gradellars.ales pazrickateWdeelodngdtysper'Ifir mitigation eteateples for Ile plan Help Your Community Let us know what you think EnlmgennyMedkal Services As put al the ryer„ing paoesz,OalmtaCaunty hasmXedtlrepublcabdttheir haaararnncersnane prepareanaas since Resources&Links 1b05,Pleasemnsmer takingsbr lei suety en hazards andauiern yraucan take leteduae rlskte your lletselleld. _ i2E Complete a 2021 Hazard Plan Survey ""`"m Project timeline Emergency Peeeareonen wintry-string 2Y1'L Publi survey,cityandrvantyupda2s 65 ti3a-47ae Summer 2021iDra3t updated plan review PublkpeMM FePv6nler 2021:Final review aridawraal 952-891-7500 publicheahh02aaakota.mn.us If you haaequaOqus about the All-Hexard Mny tion Pion,pleue wnteet Ben lhrttecfbmeland Security Specialist.at 65143g-833ZBJ.Eattir,Risk and HurneLarid security Manager.at651443.9-4532,uJim Ilift Emcrgcrcy Manager.at 651-43g-4703, last updated.SH2/20213e17 PM Figure 2.1 Plan Webpage Page 8 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Online Mitigation Planning Survey (May 2021 — September 2021) More than 1,000 people who live or work in Dakota County completed an ADA-accessible online survey related to mitigation planning. The results provided valuable public feedback on issues such as community priorities,family disaster preparedness, and willingness to spend extra on storm reinforced residences. Results of the full survey can be reviewed in Appendix II- Public Survey Results. Public Intercepts on Hazards and Household Preparedness Poster boards asking people to identify their top hazard concerns were displayed at six County libraries in the summer of 2021. Intercepts at the Dakota County Fair in August 2021 distributed information to fairgoers on emergency preparations people should do at home, including registration for the County's mass notification system.An interactive display asked people to identify which household preparedness measures they had already taken. Dakota County Planning Commission Meetings The Dakota County Planning Commission is an appointed citizen advisory body that addresses issues related to the environment, natural resources, land use, and transportation. The AHMP Planning Team provided updates to and sought input on mitigation ideas from the Planning Commission on several occasions. The Commission provided valuable feedback on hazards concerns, mitigation strategies, and ways to enhance implementation of mitigation activities throughout the County. The Planning Commission was engaged on the following plan update issues: February 25, 2021 Project Introduction, Hazard Discussion July 22, 2021 Project Update, Draft Strategies and Priorities January 27, 2022 Draft Plan Review Public Comment Period (Winter, 2021-2022) Public comment was accepted throughout the process. Prior to final submittal to MN HSEM and FEMA, a draft of the updated plan was made available to participating jurisdictions and the general public in order to solicit feedback and recommendations. All feedback was considered by the All-Hazard Planning Team and incorporated, where appropriate, into the final version of this plan. Related Plans, Studies, Reports, and Technical Information County Level The following plans were referenced in the preparation of this plan update, and relevant information has been incorporated where appropriate. In addition to being reference items, many of these regional plans are also being utilized as implementation mechanisms for the action strategies listed in Section V— Dakota County Vulnerabilities,Strategies,and Priorities. State/Federal Data, Reports, and Plans • 2019 US Census American Community Survey Data (five-year), 2010 and 2020 Census Data • US Environmental Protection Agency Datasets • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and National Weather Service Datasets • Metropolitan Council Population Estimates • MN Department of Natural Resources, water and land cover data • State of Minnesota Hazard Mitigation Plan • State of Minnesota Climatology Data • University of Minnesota, 1991 Dakota County Geologic Atlas Page 9 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 • Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) regulations and guidance County/Regional Plans, Ordinances, Data • Metropolitan Council, waste management and transit data • Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan, 2006, 2011, and 2016 • Dakota County Emergency Operations Plan, 2020 • Dakota County Comprehensive Plan, 2019, amended 2021 • Dakota County Hazardous Waste Ordinance • Dakota County Shoreland and Floodplain Ordinance • Dakota County Indicators, 2019-2021 • Dakota County Office of GIS data • Local Watershed Plans • Dakota County Groundwater Protection Plan, 2021 • Dakota County Land Conservation Plan, 2021 Municipal Level (Record of Review) At the municipal level, cities use reports, plans, ordinances, enforcement, budget tools, and existing processes to support their planning efforts and implementation goals. Examples include capital improvement budgets, emergency operations plans, building codes, and zoning ordinances. As part of the planning process, each city was asked to update their Record of Review detailing resources for implementing mitigation strategies. Plan Implementation Dakota County's Office of Risk Management and Homeland Security will work with county departments, municipalities, and other implementation partners to identify required resources, assign responsibilities, and initiate work on each mitigation strategy. Work on the individual strategies will proceed according to priority ranking and available funding. Incorporation into Planning Mechanisms Where appropriate, actions will be incorporated into local zoning ordinance, emergency operation plans, and planning studies. Each participating jurisdiction followed a planning process to evaluate how best to incorporate mitigation strategies into action. At the county level, proposed strategies were reviewed by the Dakota County Risk Management and Homeland Security, Emergency Preparedness,Transportation, Public Health, Environmental Resources, Parks, and the County Shoreland Zoning Administrator. Each municipality evaluated how local strategies could best be incorporated into existing planning mechanisms. At both levels,jurisdictions will implement the plan through appropriate mechanisms as capital improvement budgets, emergency operation plans, and local building codes. More information on implementation is provided in Section V—Dakota County Vulnerabilities, Strategies, and Priorities and in Section VI—Participating City Risks,Strategies, and Priorities. Plan Evaluation Each county-level mitigation strategy includes a baseline metric for monitoring implementation progress. The Risk and Homeland Security Manager for Dakota County will work with municipalities and other implementation partners to evaluate progress on an annual basis for each mitigation strategy. Page 10 D RAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Plan Updates Dakota County's Risk and Homeland Security Manager will coordinate the update of this plan every five years. In addition, staff will review and report the progress made on the mitigation actions listed in Section VI—Mitigation Goals and Strategies. Such reports will be distributed on a regular basis to organizations such as the Dakota County Planning Commission and the Dakota County Preparedness Committee (see below). Incorporation into Dakota County Preparedness Committee (DPC) Agenda Mitigation action status will be a regular agenda item for the DPC. On at least an annual basis, each member city will be given dedicated time to update the group on strategy progress,funding status, and opportunities for cooperation. County staff also will keep the committee up to date on the status of county-level strategies. (See page 10 for a more detailed description of the DPC.) Review with Responsible Departments (County Level) Although Dakota County's Office of Risk Management and Homeland Security Manager is ultimately accountable for the implementation of county-level actions, in many cases the responsibility of execution falls to other county departments (e.g., Dakota County Public Health, Dakota County Environmental Resources, Dakota County Transportation). In order to track progress,the Office of Risk Management and Homeland Security will meet at least annually with these departments to track progress and assist with removing implementation barriers. Five Year Updates A reviewed and updated plan will be submitted to the Dakota County Board of Commissioners, MN HSEM, and FEMA every five years, in a process coordinated by the Dakota County Risk and Homeland Security Manager. Newly identified mitigation needs will be addressed through the development of additional goals and strategies as applicable. Continued Public Involvement Public outreach and engagement efforts will continue during the five-year effective period of this plan. Future opportunities for public involvement include: • Many capital projects, ordinance changes, and plan updates associated with the mitigation strategies listed in Section VI require a formal adoption process which would include the opportunity for public participation. For these types of procedures, it is the responsibility of each associated jurisdiction to provide both notice and opportunity for public comment. This applies to both county-level and city-level mitigation actions. • Continued evaluation of plan and strategy progress will be presented to the Dakota County Planning Commission (a citizen advisory committee) on a timely basis. Committee meetings follow an open-forum agenda were public input is encouraged. • Dakota County will continue to maintain an All-Hazard Mitigation Plan website. Concerns, opinions, and new ideas will be forwarded to Dakota County's Office of Risk Management and Homeland Security. In addition, hard copies of the plan will be made available upon request. Page 11 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Page intentionally blank Page 12 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 SECTION III - COMMUNITY PROFILE Section Overview This community profile characterizes Dakota County through its key physical and I socioeconomic features, including: • Communities within the County - — �� • • Historical Setting • ys me- • Climate • $ 41.. • Geology 1914 • Topography and Soils ; • Hydrology x' • Land Cover and Land Use • • Community Infrastructure ' • Schools - Dakota County • Public Facilities • Transportation — L - • Utilities • Population and Housing I i • Demographic Trends • Economics and Labor Figure 3.1 Dakota County Location • Emergency Response Resources The profile draws on current data, studies, plans, and other documents from the following sources: • US Census Bureau • US National Weather Service • Metropolitan Council • Natural Resource Conservation Service, US Dept. of Agriculture • MN Department of Natural Resources • MN Department of Transportation • MN Department of Employment and Economic Development • Dakota County Soil and Water Conservation District • Dakota County Office of GIS • Dakota County Public Health Department • Dakota County Transportation Department • Dakota County Office of Planning • Dakota County Office of Performance Analysis • Dakota County Risk Management & Homeland Security The maps used for Dakota County's All-Hazards Mitigation plan were drawn from the Dakota County Office of Geographic Information System, Office of Planning, existing county plan documents,the Metropolitan Council, and the State of Minnesota. Location Located in east central Minnesota and south of Minneapolis and St. Paul, Dakota County is one of the seven counties forming the greater Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. Page 13 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 General County Overview Population Dakota County is the third most populous county in Minnesota, with a population of 439,882 (US Census, 2020). Most of its population is concentrated in the northern one-third of the county,while the southern two-thirds of the county are largely rural. Dakota County is one of the fastest growing counties in Minnesota over the past twenty years. The county is also home to several large employers. Dakota County comprises 20 incorporated cities and 13 unincorporated townships. Figure 3.2 below highlights the cities,townships, and major roads in Dakota County. The city of Northfield, on the southern border, is located predominantly in Rice County. Ramsey Cuuri.y Llry_ West st Paul Soul Mendota ' St Pau Men ota sun Hel hts Washington '' County i in er Gr ve Eagan Heigh Bur Wile Apple Valley Rosemount Nininger • Twp -� Ha ngs Co tes I Vermillion Twp \. Ravenna Lakeville Empire Twp Twp Vermillion Mars an Twp • Farmingto4 • Scoll Cnunly •- ti LQ2�I Hampssn New Trier • MvesyHle Eureka Twp t astle Rock Twp Ham• on Twp aougla Twp andolph • Goodhue Wejterfvrd Rai. County Greenvale Twp Twp Scrota Twp j Rice County Northfield Figure 3.2 Dakota County Cities and Townships Early Historical Setting Dakota County is 576 square miles in area, originally vegetated with oak savannas, prairies,wetlands, and woodlands. Dakota County lies at the confluence of three of the four major rivers in the State of Minnesota. The Minnesota and Mississippi Rivers form the county's northern and northwestern borders, while the St. Croix River enters the Mississippi River across from the county's northeastern border. The county's development and history have been influenced by its proximity to these rivers. Page 14 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Dakota County was part of an expansive territory of the Dakota Indigenous people. In 1689, Nicholas Perrot, a French fur trader, proclaimed possession of Dakota, Ojibwa, and other Native American lands for France without the consent of the tribes. The Louisiana Purchase annexed French-held lands west of the Mississippi River into the United States. The City of Mendota in northwestern Dakota County became the first European settlement in Minnesota. Indigenous peoples, systematically removed from their lands,were forced to move further west. The Minnesota Territorial legislature created nine original counties, including Dakota, in 1849.The county's original boundary extended only as far south as Hastings but extended west several hundred miles to the Missouri River in what is now South Dakota. Hastings became the county seat in 1857. Minnesota became a state in May 1858, nine years after Dakota County was formed. Physical Characteristics Climate Dakota County's climate is continental, with cold, dry winters and warm, sub-humid summers. Winter precipitation is snow or mixed snow and rain. During warm months, rain occurs when warm moist Gulf air meets cooler air over the region. Heavily urbanized areas in nearby Hennepin and Ramsey Counties and urbanized northern and western suburbs may contribute to local variations in weather patterns. This effect has been described as an "urban heat island" and results from heavily urbanized areas being several degrees warmer than surrounding vegetated land. Twin Cities'weather typically circulates - - counter-clockwise, with warm fronts arriving from the southwest and south, and cold fronts arriving from the north and northwest. 28' 29' Weather patterns appear to circulate around the Twin Cities in a "trough" that includes most of the western and northern suburbs of _ Minneapolis. Another trough is believed to --- 28' exist on the county's southern,following the Cannon River. Not well-documented,this area y appears to have higher frequency of strong +J winds, tornadoes, and severe weather than surrounding areas. " Seasonal temperatures cover a broad range. The average daily temperature is 44.4 degrees Fahrenheit (°F). Normal average daily Figure 3.3 Mean Annual Precipitation temperatures range from 13.7 °F in January to 72.1 °F in July. Last frost is generally between May 6 and May 19. The growing season is approximately 166 days, sufficient to grow corn, soybeans, and other crops. First frost normally occurs between September 25 and October 6. The highest recorded temperature was 110 degrees on July 14, 1936. The lowest recorded temperature of-40 degrees was recorded on January 23, 1935, and again on March 1, 1962. From precipitation recorded from 1991 to 2020 (Table 3.1), the total average annual precipitation in Dakota County is 32.8 inches. Seasonal and yearly rainfall amounts vary, and long-term averages indicate that rainfall is higher in the north and central regions of the county(Figure 3.3).Table 3. shows mean monthly precipitation at various county locations and that 65 to 68 percent of the annual Page 15 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 precipitation falls in the summer growing season. Similarly, 50 to 59 percent of the precipitation events occur within this period. Table 3.1 1991-2020 Precipitation Normals in Dakota County(inches) Weather Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Year Station Farmington 1.05 0.81 1.66 2.72 3.93 4.89 4.24 4.42 33.20 2.75 1.64 1.01 32.32 Rosemount 0.96 0.9 1.8 3.1 4.32 4.88 4.51 4.43 3.44 2.86 1.71 1.21 34.12 Hastings .90 .91 1.78 3.10 4.33 4.94 4.37 4.23 3.21 2.61 1.72 1.23 33.33 MSP Airport .89 .87 1.68 2.91 3.91 4.58 4.06 4.34 3.02 2.58 1.61 1.17 31.62 Source-National Weather Service The 24-hour maximum rainfall was 10.0 inches on July 23-24, 1987. The maximum snowfall received in a single storm was 28.4 inches on October 31 - November 1, 1991 (the "Halloween Blizzard"). Table 3.2 Dakota County Monthly Average Temperatures and Precipitation,1991-2020 Month Avg.High Avg.Low Avg. Avg.Inches Avg.Inches Temperature Temperature Temperature Rain Snow January 23.2 6.4 14.8 0.95 10.8 February 28.2 10.0 19.1 0.87 8.0 March 41.0 22.8 31.9 1.73 8.1 April 56.3 35.8 46.1 2.96 2.7 May 68.6 48.1 58.3 4.12 0.0 June 78.3 58.7 68.5 4.82 0.0 July 82.4 63.0 72.7 4.30 0.0 August 79.9 60.7 70.3 4.36 0.0 September 72.6 52.4 62.5 3.22 0.0 October 58.5 39.3 48.9 2.70 0.6 November 42.0 26.1 34.0 1.67 6.9 December 28.5 13.5 21.0 1.16 9.2 Annual 54.9 36.4 45.7 32.8 46.1 Source-National Weather Service Compared to the previous three-decade period amounts for April 1 to November 17, 2020, a (1981-2010),the average winter low slightly above normal water year for the county. temperature has increased by 1.5 degrees, and K er colpdati�%HDrmaI average annual precipitation has increased by kL � apio�+�.aoao 1.4 inches. The Minnesota Climatology Office111111 �r describes the likely future climate for Minnesota as warmer and wetter. NM An estimated 76 percent of precipitation I , 1�,31 � re- evaporates/transpires to the atmosphere (25 �I� ir inches), 22 percent runs off(7 inches), and 2 Millain percent (less than an inch) recharges ig.11PW111 groundwater. Shallow and/or coarse soils may 1- recharge groundwater more rapidly with less ��IIII�■CIIIrl;,. runoff. Since 2016, annual precipitation in ■ MENNE DI.R Eca,v31-st3i.2 C:m3mniv Cra..1 -17-2a2o Dakota County has been above normal. Figure 3.4 shows precipitation departures from normal Figure 3.4 Minnesota Precipitation Departures Page 16 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 - • • ••• Much of the aquifer recharge used for drinking water in Dakota County relies on rainfall and Qualernsrydeposits Hay erstainaakr tined for I Swikedrpa:Ust:nod and snowmelt. Water levels in surface or near graell erodes easily "tQ ` surface aquifers generally drop quickly during drought and rebound quicklywhen water is Decorah Rale As cop meet underlying g Claydrkeskriewit kin luecl- ', . aquirers Irian umtaminamo available for recharge. Water levels in deeper bearion]unL�rnnc PlauerillealldS;lrnrsnnd =-Suppl�crcrylimuedanomLs bedrock aquifers are also affected during Formation =e=dater to no-thern Dakota periods of drought and may take much longer F+sil-bearing Irmeuune •As Cony and aanlyshale to recharge to pre-drought conditions. The St PeterSandatone • Supplies limited amwrx• impact of drought is compounded by increased Poorly cemented.granular • - .untoto Dakota County sandstorg water demand. Duringthe drought of 1987- - — Easily contaminated in central g —---=and srnlhenpinions of a 1989, water use by irrigation, municipal and . • •the County Prairie do Olen Formatim ssvazeriordnme�s other high-capacity wells more than doubled Limestone use from 1986 amounts. Jordan Sandstone - Primary SOON lot®nsg aL Pnuriy cemented_tranuler 3ndmuiab enl high capacity undslese •inigari n wits Geology St.Laareuee-Tannel—f J produces smallamrunn l . The geology of Dakota County can be described City Formation watcrin cam Da bti y Shi;e+sanJstoce r:illstane __ by three major units: Quaternary(surficial) oneµocS Sandstone geology, Paleozoic (bedrock)geology, and sdrym coarse-grained sanetoae = — Proterozoic(basement)geology. Eau Claire Formation Does nat amain water Sillstooe.iiaesandstone. _ = Quaternary Geology anti itsle -. Quaternary geology in Dakota County consists Mt.Simon-Hinkley _ _ • . . Formation of materials that have been deposited by Fi ne glaciers, outwash, alluvium (river deposits) and lacustrine (lake) deposits within the last two DAKOTACO[;NTYGROUND million years. Glacial deposits in Dakota County WATER AND GEOLOGY are mainly sand, gravel, till, and loess. Figure 3.5 Geologic Column of Dakota County Sand and gravel deposits are associated with glacial outwash, or materials deposited beyond the terminal margin of the ice. The well-sorted gravel deposits mined in Dakota County are generally found in glacial outwash. Their coarse texture allows for the formation of surficial aquifers. Where outwash is close to the surface,these aquifers are particularly susceptible to contamination. Glaciers caused other changes not visible on the land surface, including a large ancient river valley that cuts deeply into the bedrock across Dakota County. This valley was filled with fine sand during early periods of glaciation and is of concern because of the hydrologic connection between the surface and all of the bedrock aquifers used for drinking water supplies in the County. Paleozoic (Bedrock) Geology The bedrock beneath Dakota County is part of the Twin Cities Basin that was formed during the Paleozoic Era (225-600 million years ago). All bedrock formations in Dakota County are marine sedimentary rock composed of dolomite, limestone, sands, and shales associated with ancient seas. After their formation,tectonic forces created a series of small folds and faults with displacements of about 100 feet for folds and between 50 and 150 feet for faults. The Empire Fault and the Vermillion Anticline (an upward fold) are the two largest structures known to occur in the County. Figure 3.6 shows the uppermost bedrock layer in the county. Page 17 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Proterozoic (Basement) Geology Made up of basalts and crystalline igneous rock,this geology has little impact on land use or hazards risk. Topography Dakota County's highest elevations are on its northern and western moraines. The highest point is Buck Hill in the City of Burnsville, with an elevation of over 1,195 feet above mean sea level. The lowest point is 675 feet, where the Mississippi River leaves the county. Apart from the Mississippi and Minnesota River Valleys,the overall slope of the county is southeastward with an elevation change of 200 feet. Dakota County's topography is a result of various glacial advances and retreats. Hilly areas in the northern and western parts of the county are glacial moraines, or the terminus of a glacial advance. Flat, sandy areas of the county (central and south central) are outwash plains, created from glacial meltwater reworking glacial debris. Deep valleys and terraces of the Minnesota and Mississippi Rivers were cut by floodwater released from the Glacial Lake Agassiz. Soils, lakes, and most other surface features in the county can be also attributed to these glacial advances. Landforms in Dakota County can be divided into four generalized categories: • Glacial Moraines • Outwash Plains • Bedrock Areas • Fluvial Landforms Glacial moraines The Wisconsin Glaciation began about 75,000 years ago and ended roughly 12,000 years ago. Glacial moraines in northern and western Dakota County mark the furthest advance of its two most recent lobes,the Superior Lobe and the Des Moines Lobe. An earlier glacial advance created moraine found in Hampton and Douglas Townships in the south-central portion of the county. Moraine topography is hilly and irregular with many deep, poorly drained depressions. Most of the county's natural lakes and wetlands are found in these areas. Moraine soils are a mix of sand, gravel, boulders, and clay, so perched water tables are also found in these areas. The relief of glacial moraines ranges from 5 to 200 feet from hill base to hilltop. Slopes vary from 1-6 percent in gently rolling areas, to 12-18 percent or more in parts of the cities of Eagan, Apple Valley, Burnsville, and Inver Grove Heights, and Hampton and Douglas Townships. Suburban housing is the predominant land use in much of the county's moraine areas. Outwash plains Outwash plains were formed by deposition of glacial materials from meltwaters draining away from terminal moraines. Outwash plains are found throughout the central portion of the county and contain some of the richest gravel deposits in the metropolitan area. Most outwash plain soils tend to be droughty, but with irrigation these soils can become some of the most productive cropland in the state. Bedrock areas The county's lightly glaciated south-southeastern areas include bedrock outcrops at or near the surface amid glacial deposits. Visible bedrock is generally the St. Peter Sandstone or Platteville Formation. The Prairie du Chien Formation, generally covered by a thin layer of overburden, is visible in some ravines and road cuts. The county's karst topography(Figure 3.7)with fractured bedrock can include sinkholes, disappearing streams, and underground drainage. Karst provides conduits that directly connect surface water to the ground water and are particularly susceptible to ground water contamination. Agriculture is the predominant land use in the bedrock areas of the county. Although soils in these areas are not considered "prime agricultural," irrigation and other practices produce good crop yields. Page 18 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Decorah Shale Lilydale Platteville and Glenwood Formations South weal 5[ St Paul Mcmdutd Paul St.Peter Sandstone Mendota S„nfish - Prairie Du Chien Group Heights Ld kr Jordan Sandstone i4. St Lawrence and Tunnel City i rover '" °Grove - Wonewoc Sandstone Heights- I Al • k' : • • APPIe Valley NS L keville --, • Lvmltll•G ---- r lib rap!iL; - .....,•.' a- l f wlit tllia • 'r 7' New Trier iesrill Sib • ,v • {`` RoakTwp Hampton T oo„glas Twp: ilk Ilk - - , 1M t G .sf„ ifaV Northfield Figure 3.6 Dakota County Uppermost Bedrock Geology Fluvial landforms Floodplains are the most common fluvial landform and are found in major and tributary river valleys. The Mississippi and Minnesota rivers contain the most expansive floodplains in the county,with a complex network of lakes,wetlands, sandbars, chutes, and sloughs. Smaller floodplains border the Cannon and Vermillion Rivers, with floodplain forests, shrubland, cropland or pastureland, and some riverine wetlands. Floodplain materials include fine silts and clays, although large peat deposits exist within the Minnesota River floodplain. Most floodplains in the county are in a natural state or an altered natural state. Development was allowed to occur within floodplains in the past, although current state law and local ordinances prohibit new development. Page 19 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 — Regions Prone to Surface Lilydale' • south Karst Feature Development '"' - St pail Karst Features Mendota ' Paul ... l Mendota Sunfish Spring Hei9hM Lako � Stream Sink s' ■ Sinkhole Inver Grove vii,.._....."....r..... Heights Eagan I ilk/10 Mw re li . v., . I AplpefY Rosem Hieing rigg "` Co.t.s �o Lfi 5.,. t 11 ' . Lakeville A irmiillun 1, , Empire ��•' •a.1.n Twp Rarer 1 iwp•r 1 ! Farmington .t E. `r r , i ' . .:4:' irk1, 17=1olph -T1 Wale p 11 Northfield Figure 3.7 Karst Areas,Sinkholes,and Springs in Dakota County Well-developed natural terraces along the Minnesota and Mississippi River valleys are floodplains formed when the river flowed at a higher elevation than at present. Terraces represent periods of stability separated by periods of the river cutting deeper in its channel. Three distinct terraces line the county's major river valleys-- an upper, middle and lower terrace. Of the three,the middle terrace is the most extensive and the best defined. Terraces support a wide range of land uses. Parts of Burnsville, Eagan, Hastings, Mendota, Mendota Heights, South St. Paul, Nininger Township, and Ravenna Township are located on river terraces. Pronounced river bluffs are part of the river terrace system in the major river valleys and include some of the county's steepest terrain. (Figure 3.8) Page 20 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Lilydale South / West Saint Mendota Saint • Paul Paul S( YMendota wish Heights I • Inver Grove Eagan Heights Burnsville APPle Rosemount Nininger Valley Hastings Coates .. Lakeville Vermillion Ravenna Empire Marshan Vermillion Farmington - Hampton New Trier %.. Miesville Eureka Castle Douglas Rock Hampton Randolph Waterford Randolph Greenvale Scioto --- - n ft- _ O 5 14) 15 21 31 • upto S6 Northfield SI o pe of terrain[deg reea] Figure 3.8 Steep Slopes Figure 3.9 is a generalized map of major soil units in Dakota County. Soil properties reflect: • Parent material properties • Climate under which the soil formed • Climate since soil formation • Plant and animal life on the soil • Local topography Most of the county's soils were formed from glacial material, loess, river sediments, and bedrock materials. Clays, loamy, organic soils, and fine textured soils hold water and slow the rate of contaminant entry into groundwater. Coarser soils hold less water and contaminants travel through them faster. Soils along the Mississippi and Minnesota rivers and in the Vermillion River and Chub and Pine creek floodplains are loamy, silty, clayey, level, and poorly drained. Soils in the remainder of the county are well drained to excessively well drained and occur on gentle to steep slopes. Soils are shallower to the east and southeast of the county. Page 21 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Sand Lilydale Snuth Sandy Loam West St Sr Paul Mendota - paul _ Loam C�`m"4ndota Sunfish Silt Loam •r±'ryeight-a Lake _ Clay Loam :5,i _ Muck Inver tiI crave � Unknown �AHeiphts rr� Eagan, • - Water L. am YiII A ke ..C. :'•ate. .. FP Rosemount ti ninger,Tw - •- _'A ,�;.. _ Hastings T.-. : . ,. „14-3iiip.,... . - Inti% .1- •--.%: . .4-.7fy 'ti -Coates- _b - mm4, ail . ..:, .. ... „. -4 r, .......•A.1.7-, iii w . . `' it =, '`JO ,:_-c s1�-•4 _ ,— �'_ i- 3.'. ,M - f rive.„-4 rw _YI {. i t "..y k 2• fir. ,�+- �- - - Yi? ! �� :�{�: .B" p`y7q/s4� y^"��'q C. . +, �i.I��F�■ si; y[#'•�ytl 40�y4...41f � ,} r u•ks r• - '$I .i,.. 4:$„ Randolph'P&p i•a.. • ._41►74/ - .- - _ - F ra? 'W te'rf d # - - .-;''''•., i'-':s.q"•:sir Northfield Figure 3.9 Generalized Soils in Dakota County Groundwater Most of the drinking water in Dakota County is sourced from groundwater. The six major aquifers beneath Dakota County in depth-descending order are the Platteville, St. Peter, Prairie du Chien and Jordan, St. Lawrence-Tunnel City, Wonowoc, and the Mt. Simon-Hinckley. The Prairie du Chien and Jordan aquifers extend through most of the metropolitan area and are commonly used for domestic and municipal supplies. Dakota County's major drinking water aquifers are limestone or sandstone bedrock formations or glacially derived gravel deposits. Limestone formations in the county have considerable vertical fracturing and zones of weakness between bedding planes allowing easy lateral movement of water. In some cases,these vertical fractures and the bedding planes have become cavernous as water has dissolved the surrounding limestone, permitting an unchecked downward and lateral flow of contaminants. Much of Dakota County is sensitive to groundwater contamination through movement of surface or near-surface contaminants into groundwater. Figure 3.10 shows the relative sensitivities to contamination of the Prairie du Chien aquifer. Page 22 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Very High Lilyiale MI High South • Wesl St � St Paul Mendota...- paui High-Moderate a. . Mendota Sunfish Moderate - H eights Lake I` A Low-Moderate Low �• a. Grove Very Low ,IL Grove Heights T Water .may 4..r Etoa' -villa t .. i Val..•ple Gr.�qi kb f • Lakeville 1 .. t it- _ TwP. �,.r,: ___ _ • HaTpton � gl New Trier •+ ar sv I Ile Castle x -I .. Eureka TwP Rock Tw. • mptan Twp • you la Tw p` � r 4 1 ,,, am g !,,- ' .. --- i 4 17F fti�l — Greenvale TwP We eii,- Twp� l T . Northfield Figure 3.10 Aquifer Sensitivity(1991, Dakota County Geologic Atlas) Rivers Major rivers are shown in the Watershed Map in Figure 3.11. The Mississippi River borders the northeastern edge of the county. Drainage from most of the county finds its way either directly to the Mississippi River or indirectly via the Vermillion or Cannon River. The Twin Cities is the head of commercial navigation on the Upper Mississippi River, and Dakota County includes one navigation lock and dam (Lock and Dam No. 2 in Hastings) and several river terminals. The Mississippi River in Dakota County is part of the 72-mile federal Mississippi National River and Recreation Area (MNRRA). The MNRRA Comprehensive Management Plan prescribes a two-tier implementation approach. The first tier incorporates planning and regulatory requirements and standards in place as part of the state Critical Areas Act, the Shorelands Management Act, and other state and regional land use programs. The second tier is voluntary and consists of additional land, water use, resource protection, and open space policies, and guidelines developed as part of the MNRRA plan. Local governments within the MNRRA boundary are encouraged to incorporate these policies. The Minnesota River borders the northwestern edge of the county and receives surface drainage from portions of the cities of Burnsville, Apple Valley, Eagan, Mendota Heights, Lilydale, and West St. Paul. A segment of the Minnesota River from the 1-494 Bridge in Mendota Heights to the confluence with the Mississippi River in Lilydale, is included in the MNRRA river corridor. Like the Mississippi River, the Minnesota River supports commercial navigation. Page 23 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 The Vermilion River drains central Dakota County and its watershed encompasses about 350 square miles in Dakota and Scott Counties. The Vermillion River originates in Scott County and flows northeast 38 miles through Dakota County, dropping 90 feet at its falls in the City of Hastings, where the River splits and enters the Mississippi River at two separate points. The Cannon River drains extreme southern Dakota County, which is well-dissected by streams and rivers. Glacial deposits are thin and bedrock outcropping is more visible. The Cannon River is a state- designated Wild and Scenic River for part of its course through the county. Lake Byllesby is a 4.5-mile long impoundment on the Cannon River, formed by construction of a hydroelectric dam in 1910. Northern States Power Company donated the dam and adjacent lands to Dakota and Goodhue Counties in 1969. Dakota County undertook sole management of the dam in 2010. Watersheds Dakota County includes seven watersheds: the Credit River, Lower Minnesota River, Eagan-Inver Grove Heights, and Black Dog watersheds flow to the Minnesota River;the Lower Mississippi River, North Cannon River, and Vermillion River watersheds flow to the Mississippi River. Formation of watershed management organizations(WMO)was authorized through the Metropolitan Surface Water Management Act of 1982. WMO boundaries do not exactly match the hydrologic boundaries of individual watersheds.The seven managing organizations and their boundaries are show in Figure 3.11: • Black Dog Watershed Management Organization • Eagan-Inver Grove Heights Watershed Management Organization • Lower Minnesota River Watershed Management Organization • Lower Mississippi River Management Organization • Minnesota River Watershed District • North Cannon River Watershed Management Organization • Vermillion River Watershed Joint Powers Organization Each watershed organization leads the development and implementation of policies, programs, and projects that protect, preserve, and restore water resources within its borders. Page 24 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 River Centerlines Lilydalc South Minor Tributaries and Waterways West Saint Black Dog h end❑ Saint •ail Paul Eagan-Inver Grove --i Mendota SunRsh Heights Lake Lower Minnesota River Lower Mississippi River Inver North Cannon River Grove Ramsey-Washington Metro Eagan Heights Vermillion River 6.; Burnsville Apple Rosemount Nininger • Valley Hasti :Coates Lakeville Ve.- lion Raven Empire Marshall Vermillion fermi - .n _- Hampton New Trier Miesville Eureka Castle Douglas Rock Hampton Randolph Water ord Randolph Greenvale Nort eld k Figure 3.11 Watershed Management Organizations Land Cover and Use Land Cover The most recent land cover data compilation by the Metropolitan Council in 2020 shows that Dakota County is 62 percent agricultural or undeveloped land, and 38 percent urban or suburban development. In 1992,the percentage of county acreage defined as agricultural and undeveloped was 65 percent,with close to 13,000 agricultural or open land acres transitioning to development over the last thirty years. The Minnesota Landcover Classification System (MLCCS) is a hierarchical system that maps land according to predominant native vegetative communities. It also includes information on development and the extent of impervious surface, such as rooftops and pavement, which increases runoff and may increase flooding risk. Figure 3.12 displays the MLCCS percentages of impervious surface throughout the county. Page 25 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Llivdale 1 Percent Impervious WesGSt ` au St Pl Mendota <' P 0-1 0% rY ndota Sunfish 11-25% I Heights LakC ' f 26-50% + • {• 51-75% tit m er, 76-90% rr��e _91-100% • Heights' , .Eagpn x.rg -I! Ap 1N41• 3 + Vallee q, SO Rosemount . Nininger TwpAaril . Hastings ' �r4 Coates a Lakeville Vermillion Empire Twp Marshan Twp Ravenna M Vermillion Twp ::Pton ` - �- Fmin ~., New Trier Miesville Castle Eureka Twp Rock Twp Hampton Twp Douglas Twp t 1 Randolph - Randolph Twp Greenvale Twp Waterford Sei ota Twp Twp Northfield Figure 3.12 Percentage of Impervious Surface Land Use Dakota County was mostly agricultural before to World War II. Suburban growth in Dakota County, like much of the United States, has its roots in the federal highway and home mortgage credit programs developed in the 1950s. New highways made it possible for developers to create subdivisions in locations that were formerly too remote to develop. In the 1970s and 1980s, a pattern of dispersed single-family homes from the previous era began to give way to infill development. Major transportation improvements, including the completion of Interstate 494, Interstate 35 East, and the Cedar Avenue Bridge, brought more intensive land use to the county. During the 1990s, Dakota County continued evolving from suburbs of"bedroom communities"to more diversified patterns of land use. Figure 3.13 shows current(2020) land use. The Metropolitan Council, a regional government and planning body,forecasts that Dakota County's population will grow by 9 percent between 2020 and 2030, and nearly 18 percent between 2020 and 2040. Page 26 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Residential L,Eydale Jr, -7.1;: , couch Business,Commercial, Institutional St Paul Mendota Industrial,Mining,and Utility T, = Park,Recreational,or Preserve ie DI " L Agricultural or Undeveloped •i ,� '�'<, -''� Major Transportation Corridors dOpen Water j ...�• .YIH�h,ri4". 1. ,. �..• rte,". ' G..0 9Rosemount .r . ,. roger Tw. r. yHr._: ya.�.;j _ Coate . V-I ,'T y.. • l I I• • F Vermillion •.�. Yp re Marshan Twp Rarenn ' - . r Em _ Twp ftiy��:3. 1. it . .V Vermillion Twp Sri... �. Fa i� 1, . 4 Ie � i' H mpton New Trier Miesvi Ile • Castle - Eureka Twp Rock Twp Ham n Twp Douglas Twp jill 1 Randolph i Randolph Tw re:7., • - —• .ft Greenvale Twp Waterford sciota Twp Twp Northfield Figure 3.13 Existing Land Use,2020,Metropolitan Council Residential Development Trends 1990 - 2020 From the mid-1990s through 2008, more than 3,000 housing units per year were built in the county's urban areas at densities of two to three units per acre, consuming over 1,000 acres of land per year. During the same period, roughly 100 houses per year were constructed in the county's townships and rural cities at much lower densities. Although far fewer new houses were built in rural areas than in urban areas, lot sizes of 5 to 20 acres meant that a comparable amount of acreage was converted to residential use.Taken together, 2,000 to 3,000 acres of land were converted from agricultural use to suburban residential use each year. With the Great Recession that began in 2008, county development rates slowed from a peak of 4,200 housing units/year in 2004 to 609 housing units/year in 2009. New housing permits have slowly increased in recent years, with multi-family permits expanding to 1,766 in 2017 and a total of 2,480 housing permits in 2019, more than double the 1,084 permits issued in 2014. Future Land Use Figure 3.14 shows projected land use in the year 2040. Lakeville, Farmington, Rosemount, and Empire Township are expected to receive most of the forecast residential growth. Page 27 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Residential Likydale --- =Business,Commercial,Institutional • West St Paul Industrial,Mining,and Utility =Park,Recreation,or Preserve Agricultural or Undeveloped "�: Urban Expansion/Annexation . '1•,• , �i Mixed Use South w' Major Transportation Corridors � Mendota paw.� y; Nl` ti�r.' Open Water eu cviile'. • l y • ...7°• .. 9. + IS-'9111111F Pprr. ,a. - t, `aH • yRosemau nt.'91i Inger Twp _ 74.1 5 . Coates • !I• % • V. L' Lake-iille �• t-, " Yerm.11ion I l Empire p - Harshen Twp Raven Tw Y, r m p. 1 /; t Yer iHion r( 1 Twp 1 y ...4— v. _I 1 wr f I I H mpton New Trier MiesviIle ...r Castle - Eureka Twp Rock Twp Ham n Twp Douglas Tw ills L / _ _t -- ''( it Randolph R.andoiph--Tw �_ _ Greenvale Twp Waterford ',dote Twp Twp Northfield Figure 3.14 Forecast Land Use,2040 Residential:land identified by the Metropolitan Council as single-family or multifamily residential. Rural Residential: contains a building or portion used for residential purposes,including one-family homes.Cannot exceed 1 housing unit per 2.5 acre and no less than 1 housing unit per 40 acres. Agricultural: used for farming,dairying,pasturage,horticulture,floriculture,viticulture,and animal and poultry husbandry and accessory uses. Park and Recreation: primarily for public recreation activities improved with playing fields,playground or exercise equipment and associated structures. May include building(s)developed and maintained for recreational activities. Commercial: use primarily in the provision of goods or services for an unspecified market area. Industrial: used in manufacture and/or product processing;could include light or heavy industry,large warehouses,or utilities. Institutional: used for primarily religious,governmental,educational,social or health care facilities excluding clinics. Mixed Use: contains a building with significant amounts of residential,industrial,commercial and/or office uses. Land Use Authority Land use authority mostly rests with the individual cities and townships of Dakota County. Cities independently manage their own comprehensive plans, zoning classifications, and subdivision ordinance. Their decisions are influenced by Dakota County(road network), regional agencies such as the Metropolitan Council (metro sewer district), and watershed management organizations. Dakota County's land use authority is limited to permitting in shoreland/floodplain areas of the rural townships, and access spacing control in County Road right-of-way, shown in Figure 3.15. Page 28 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Lilyd ale South —County Roads 4 Saint Mendota 8 •aul = Shoreland Zoning Districts Pa 12indota suulnrr 11111 Floodplain(Rural Area) ghts Lake 494 i& 28 111. 77' I,, 14G G ••.a 5,36,' Fa ). Hei s5w R„`36) . _ '43i—.r32 52' u :urnsvple • - 0 11 :..' -!-)- (73 -71 JIPIe t33 Ros}mau+ 42' ' finger r ) U i _ Hastin,- Coates Il 46' 3 �'� t Id S7 , 1316 pi c„ Ern;r4 CO se Muir 44)- - 1 .:. ir 'Ver . ion ' (83 r..,3 AM M T ,r -i,Ha..ptan ew Tne� T6 `78 58 '— 3 , lI - ka _ Casfie T9 . c +. - `8 8J. . Rack 47 Hampton t 84 •F r `.83 ® 9f1 ? q Rondo!. .i. M-a � � � :�•w ---9-6. Ct. Northfield El Figure 3.15 Dakota County Land Use Areas Community Infrastructure Important public facilities include school districts, city and county public buildings, and of other areas where people congregate. Schools Dakota County has nine public school districts, a county-wide intermediate district for special education students, and several private institutions. Figure 3.16 shows public school district boundaries;Table 3.3 indicates the number of schools in each district. Dakota County has two public colleges: Dakota Technical College in Rosemount and Inver Hills Community College in Inver Grove Heights. Page 29 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 a Public School Locations o ' . Districts # 196 West St.0 ■!i:i•• St Paul #6 SO WI #197 Paul-Mendota • Schools #199 Heights-Eagan-• • • # 191 Area Schools • • 4� #192 #200 Inver Grove #252 .• Heights A # 194 0 CO Community - # 195 #659 Burnsville=Eagan- ■• 0 6 0' *Schools Savage Schools■ • 00 • •s• 0 • ■ 0 0 0 0 0 cf)OC O,,,G Q7❑ 0 •• • • r � ■ Rosemount-Apple • 0 0 d Valley-Eagan Lakeville p 0 Schools Area 0 'Schools o Hastings °•; ' 0 0• • Schools • !►. .5 111 Farmington Area Schools Randolph CitElMaIRIED • Schools Figure 3.16 Public School Districts and Schools Table 3.3 Dakota County School Districts: Number of Schools District Communities Served Schools SD 6 South St. Paul 4 ISD 191 Burnsville Savage Eagan 15 ISD 192 Farmington 8 ISD 194 Lakeville 15 ISD 195 Randolph 2 ISD 196 Rosemount Apple Valley Eagan 30 ISD 197 West St. Paul, Mendota Heights, Eagan 8 ISD 199 Inver Grove Heights 5 ISD 200 Hastings 6 Public Charter Schools 6 Private Schools 30 County Public Facilities Dakota County owns and/or operates more than 65 buildings with 1,700,000 square feet of space, including office space for services, courts, park buildings, libraries, and maintenance buildings.All major buildings incorporate severe weather shelter facilities. County facilities are shown in Figure 3.17 Page 30 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Dakota County operates nine public libraries. A tenth library in the county is owned by the City of South St. Paul. All of the Dakota County libraries are either new or recently remodeled. Area libraries provide a full range of services and typically serve between 35,000 to 55,000 residents. Dakota County Park has seven parks: Lebanon Hills Regional Park, Lake Byllesby Regional Park,Whitetail Woods Regional Park, Spring Lake Park Reserve, Miesville Ravine Park Reserve, and Thompson County Park. Annual use of the park system is roughly two million visits. County facilities are listed below by geographic area: Eastern Locations • Administration Center, Hastings (County Seat) • Judicial Center, Hastings • Law Enforcement Center, Hastings • Juvenile Center, Hastings • Spring Lake Park Reserve, Nininger and Rosemount • Highway Maintenance Shop, Hastings • Pleasant Hill Library, Hastings Western Locations • Western Service Center, Apple Valley • Galaxie Library,Apple Valley • Highway Maintenance Shop, Rosemount • Highway Shop, Empire • Lebanon Hills Regional Park, Eagan • Wescott Library, Eagan • Burnhaven Library, Burnsville • Heritage Library, Lakeville Northern Locations • County Historical Society and Museum, South St. Paul • Northern Service Center, West St. Paul • Wentworth Library, West St. Paul • Thompson County Park, West St. Paul: Dakota Lodge Visitor/Senior Center • Inver Glen Library, Inver Grove Heights • SMART Center, Inver Grove Heights • South St. Paul Library(city owned) Southern Locations • Farm Extension Building, Farmington • Lake Byllesby Regional Park Maintenance Building, Randolph Township • Highway Maintenance Shop, Farmington • Farmington Library • Robert Trail Library, Rosemount • Whitetail Woods Regional Park, Empire: camper cabins and showers and large picnic shelter Page 31 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 West © Libraries int Lllyd e.. Paufj4. South • County Buildings Saint X Park Buildings Mendot F i L Paul 119endota County Parks Sunfish— Heights take Maintenance Facilities r ■ Dakota County Transportation Eagan I © I Dakota County Parks Inver J The Recycling Zone • Grove Heights Burnsville ititri4iNne:01. Apple Valley Rosemount ininger _©asnngs Cn tes 1 Vermillion Lakeville Farmington I Ravenna Empire ^^ - Marshan Vermillion ■p — "�— Hampton New Trier Miesville Eureka Castle Rock Douglas Hampton Randolph Randolph I Waterford Greenvake I aciota Northfield Figure 3.17 County Facilities,Buildings,and Parks Other Large Parks and Natural Areas in Dakota County Fort Snelling State Park(3,460 acres): Located in Dakota, Ramsey and Hennepin counties overlooking the confluence of the Mississippi and Minnesota Rivers. The park includes two state historic sites administered by the Minnesota Historical Society: Historic Fort Snelling and Camp Coldwater. With approximately 500,000 visits per year, Fort Snelling State Park is the second most-visited state park. Minnesota Zoological Gardens(500 acres): Located in Apple Valley. Outdoor facilities include five walking trails featuring a variety of plants and animals in their natural setting, children's zoo, playground, 1,500-seat outdoor amphitheater, and 200 seat indoor theater. Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge(9,583 acres): Located in several counties. The Refuge stretches 34 miles along the Minnesota River from Fort Snelling State Park to Jordan and is administered by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service. Facilities include a visitor center and several trails. Historical Resources Dakota County has more than 900 properties on the Minnesota State Historical Preservation Office's database, with 38 properties or structures listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Nearly one- half of the National Register-listed structures are located within the City of Hastings. Dakota County includes three National Register-listed historic districts: Page 32 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 • Mendota Historic District, located in the Village of Mendota • Hastings East Second Street Commercial Historic District, in downtown Hastings • Hastings West Second Street Residential Historic District, in Hastings The Dakota County Historical Society maintains its archives and museum in South St. Paul. Most of Dakota County's historic properties could be considered vulnerable to natural and manmade disasters. Regional Destinations In addition to the city and county public facilities listed above, several sites are regional attractions that draw a large number of visitors on a seasonal or year-round basis: • Buck Hill Ski Area, Burnsville • Burnsville Mall, Burnsville (under new ownership, potential for redevelopment) • Twin Cities Premium Outlets, Eagan • Central Commons shopping complex, Eagan • Minnesota Vikings Complex and TCO Performance Center, Eagan • Dakota County Fairgrounds and Dakota City Heritage Village, Farmington Transportation Roads The existing Dakota County highway system has a total of 414 centerline miles, of which 366 miles are paved and 48 miles are gravel-surfaced. Dakota County has oversight on and maintains 96 bridges, 238 traffic signals, and 18,200 signs. Dakota County coordinates its roadway efforts with those of city, state and federal governments. Functional classification systems group highways based on the type of trips they are intended to serve. The Metropolitan Council and the Transportation Advisory Board (TAB), working together as the Metropolitan Planning Organization for the Twin Cities, have adopted a series of functional classification system criteria for the Twin Cities region. Figure 3.18 shows Dakota County's road system and connections to adjacent counties in terms of roadway functional classes. More residents are driving significantly more miles on County highways each year and the rate of increase is greater than the rate of population growth.The county experienced a 54 percent increase in miles driven between 1990 and 2000, compared with 29 percent population growth in the same period. Between 2020 and 2040,vehicle miles traveled is estimated to grow 20 percent, compared with an estimated 21 percent population growth. Vehicle miles driven are a measure of highway demand, especially when compared to growth. Page 33 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 ----Planned JI it 4 -Principal Arterial �4 -A Minor Au mentor 6 rill:11 94-' -A Minor Re ever � 3 •r s , A Minor Expander i + r-�i 126 -A Minor Connector ' 'j at- -Other Arterial r� x8 f ,y Major Collector ��w �:,��4Oa \\ Minor Collector as ft-- it li 0 35 MN L33 �,78r �.•rr�� : . 48iS i• ■ 54 ,. Ali / . k 60 .",,, --f I 1.6dJ .a _ 6� 35 .59 es' 6.5, WE J : T0!) +. . _ a CO it 316 78 bw'® CDT (8 23lirr 86 W i,e9, Y ss'. II r Figure 3.18 Road Classifications in Dakota County Major Bridges The Minnesota and Mississippi Rivers frame the north and northeastern boundaries of Dakota County, from Burnsville to Ravenna Township. Dakota County's rapid development in the 1980s is directly related to the completion of major river crossings. Major bridge crossings of the Minnesota and Mississippi Rivers are shown in Figure 3.19, and include: 1. I-35W Bridge over the Minnesota River linking Burnsville and Bloomington. 2. Cedar Avenue Bridge (TH 77) linking Eagan and Bloomington. 3. 1-494 Bridge connecting Eagan/Mendota Heights with Bloomington. 4. Mendota Bridge (TH 55)from Mendota/Mendota Heights to the International Airport Area. 5. I-35E Bridge (Lexington Avenue) from Mendota Heights to St. Paul. 6. 1-494 (Wakota) Bridge from South St. Paul to Newport. 7. Hastings Bridge (TH 61)from Hastings to Washington County. 8. US Highway 52 Bridge over the Vermillion River Page 34 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Liltdale ---- ■ • West St Paul So h Mendota -• St Pau • • Mendota Sunfish ■" —+fehts Lake• ,y 1S Inver Grove Eagan Heights Burnsville if! I Apple Valley Rosemount Nininger r� Twp • Hastings . Coates • • i Vermillion Twp Ravens. Lakeville Empire Twp 1 Twp Mershon Twp ■: • Vermillion Farmington Hampton Miesvilie New Trier rj Eureka Twp Castle Rock Twp Hampton Twp Douglas Twp Randolph Randolph Twp 'Waterford Greenvale Twp Twp Scioto Twp Northfield Figure 3.19 Major Bridges Serving Dakota County Four bridges across the Mississippi River—the Robert Street Bridge, Wabasha Bridge,the St. Paul High Bridge (Smith Avenue) and the TH 52 (Lafayette Freeway) Bridge-are just north of Dakota County, but provide important links between Dakota County and St. Paul and Ramsey County. All bridges linking Dakota County with Hennepin, Ramsey, and Washington Counties are part of the state trunk highway system and are a strategic concern of Dakota County. Transit Although the automobile is the dominant mode of transportation, transit systems in Dakota County provide alternate means of transportation. The level of transit service ranges from relatively high in the older fully developed communities to minimal or none in the southern rural areas. Figure 3.20 shows current transit routes. Page 35 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 •est ul t F ' la Transit Centers Mrndot Oth S 12 Park And Ride Lots ,� M - Express , �Q Sun" t r Lake — Suburban Local t.. Inver U I — Urban Local Grove Height �� Eagan le I I - I Rosemount 115 nger P Twp Hastings — - �-— -- Coates 1 J Vermillion Twp Ravenna ~0 Lakeville Empire Twp Vermillion Twp Marshan Twp 12 Farmington Haman New Trier Miesville Eureka Twp Castle Rock Twp Hampton Imp Douglas Twp Randolph Twp Waterford Randolph Greenvale Twp Twp Sciota Twp A Atorthf eid Figure 3.20 Transit Services in Dakota County Dakota County benefits from having multiple transit providers. Metro Transit provides regional services in northeastern Dakota County, including the cities of Mendota Heights, Inver Grove Heights, West St. Paul, and South St. Paul. Transit in this area is characterized as "local radial service,"with five regular routes connecting northern Dakota County with downtown St. Paul. The Minnesota Valley Transit Authority(MVTA) provides predominately peak hour express service from the cities of Eagan, Burnsville and Apple Valley to downtown Minneapolis and downtown St. Paul. In 2013,the Metro Red Line,the first bus rapid transit (BRT) service in the Twin Cities, began operations on an 11-mile route between Apple Valley and the Mall of American transit station. BRT is enhanced bus service with faster travel and higher reliability through frequent service, shoulder lane operation, off- board fare collection,traffic signal priority and improved passenger information. Future plans for the Red Line include extending the line to Lakeville.The MVTA operates the Red Line. In addition to existing transit services in Dakota County, local and regional plans have identified several transit corridors within the County for expanded and enhanced transit service.These corridors include: 1-35W BRT Corridor: Bus rapid transit on I-35W from Lakeville to downtown Minneapolis Red Rock Corridor:Commuter rail from Hastings and St. Paul and Minneapolis downtowns Page 36 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Transit stations Dakota County currently has four transit stations and several park and ride locations. Table 3.4 Transit Stations and Park&Rides Minnesota Valley Transit Authority Capacity Burnsville Transit Station 1,428 Apple Valley Transit Station 1,160 Eagan Transit Station 719 Cedar Grove Transit Station 166 Blackhawk Park and Ride 370 Heart of City Park and Ride 343 Palomino Hills Park and Ride 318 157th St Park and Ride 258 Lakeville-Cedar Park and Ride 190 Rosemount Park and Ride 102 Metro Transit Capacity West St. Paul Sports Complex 100 I-35/Kenrick 750 Railroads Railroads are a significant element in the county's transportation system, moving freight to and between ports and major urban areas. Railroads have influenced land use,the physical environment of the county, and other components of the transportation system. Canadian Pacific Railway and Union Pacific Railroad are the two Class I rail carriers operating in Dakota County. The Union Pacific Railroad operates four to nine trains per day on most of its routes in Dakota County. A segment between Northfield and Cannon Falls carries a maximum of three trains per day, while a line between Inver Grove Heights and St. Paul averages from 10 to 19 trains daily. Union Pacific operates a major classification yard in South St. Paul, where 500 cars are received and dispatched daily. The Canadian Pacific Railway operates an average of three trains per day on each of its Dakota County routes.A shared mainline between St. Paul and Hastings runs along the far side of the Mississippi River, just outside the county's borders, with a high volume of daily traffic south through Wisconsin to Chicago. Figure 3.21 shows the major rail lines in Dakota County. Air Transportation The two airports in Dakota County are part of a regional airport system. Both serve as reliever airports to reduce congestion at Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport and to provide increased aviation access to nearby communities. See Figure 3.21 for airport locations. • South St. Paul Municipal Airport (SGS, Fleming Field): under the jurisdiction of the City of South St. Paul. Classified as a minor airport in the regional system, it has one 4,000-foot runway. It has limited development potential and therefore, no major expansion is planned. The airport has more than 60,000 takeoffs and landings annually. • Airlake Airport(LVN): under the jurisdiction of the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC). Similar to South St. Paul, it is classified as a minor airport,with a 4,100-foot runway.The airport annually has more than 39,000 takeoffs and landings. Future plans include new hangars in the southwest corner of the airfield, expanding the primary runway to 4,850 feet, and developing a 2,500-foot crosswind runway. Page 37 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 The following two metropolitan airports are in close proximity to Dakota County. Each has the potential for safety and environmental impacts on nearby residential areas. • St. Paul Downtown Airport (STP, Holman Field): Located in the City of St. Paul on the south side of the Mississippi River just north of South St. Paul. The airport is under the jurisdiction of the MAC and is the primary reliever for the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport(MSP). Three runways, of 6,500, 4,000, and 3,640 ft. length, accommodated 53,373 takeoffs and landings in 2015. Roughly 100 aircraft are based at the facility. • Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport (MSP): MSP is located in Hennepin County, northwest of the Dakota County cities of Mendota Heights and Eagan. Under the jurisdiction of the MAC, it primarily serves scheduled air passenger and cargo services. In 2019, MSP served 39.5 million passengers and accommodated 406,076 landings and takeoffs making it 17th in North America for the number of travelers served. MSP has four runways of 11,000, 10,000, 8,200, and 8,000 feet in length. Busy southern runway approaches cut across a large portion of Dakota County. ` • St Prairl .4 Downiown LOglno I • =9,0a0sEb.e • Fregk Fedld'ce •----_! ManuF3SI3rrg KA Minn nnpnlis AnnualFreight Values OM)-'St.Po JI . M5 $, I • +Prrpar.F rt, []o-30 Inlern`o1lono• .' :R B,.9.,'] * 4�,. aim Miwuay.2wrl []350-KO •1 f . ..ti'3kIL 03. EEII i1 �rslr.a 'Aa"roo xa 461 • toots si Poe—"T,"r Gwnty Hi9rcr'�1'L' Q T]]"630 . �T,JA Tem�i�a's Qax-.2'A I ,_• 7 6 .: ?9' -,4 =',iaw.(;SfS3.arcl al'nm) lfur!eICe1N =9 �9 aM Zone?(i0"id GM1 Twrmhp ,iadlIP •3• " =Zane 3[95•aPDNLJ _ • e =Zane d 050•8d13kLJ .... _ i10 0,,,lAtm:u.4'gSad A`rrw4r`+rw,+kn.rn f T �'- I :I: 62 m- 1 . , ii •�� \ . • : ±7' .2 i_, A fib.. I 51 \ 31, A Mke i. J1 "� 79i _A r . - r aux urmM olio Figure 3.21 Freight,Rail,and Ports in Dakota County Commercial River Navigation Commercial navigation continues to be an important part of the transportation system serving Dakota County. The most recent study (1984) undertaken by the Metropolitan Council reported that nearly Page 38 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 1,000 jobs in the county were related to commercial navigation. In 2009, Dakota County's terminals handled over 14 percent of the region's river freight (1.7 million net tons.) From an organizational standpoint,the City of Rosemount is the only community in the county with a municipal port authority. Barge facilities are mapped in Figure 3.21. Table 3.5 Major River Terminals in or Near Dakota County Terminal Location U.S. Salt Burnsville CF Industries and Flint Hills Resources Rosemount Dakota Bulk South St. Paul Cargill East,Cargill West,Superior Minerals, Mosaic Savage(Scott County) Crop Nutrients,CHS Trucking Trucking of freight contributes to the economic vitality of the county and region.Trucks are the mode of choice for most regional and short-haul trips. Future economic competitiveness will depend in part on a transportation system that allows efficient movement of freight. Several truck terminals with over 1,000 trucks are located in Dakota County along major transportation routes. Airlake Industrial Park, located along CSAH 70 in Lakeville, is the second largest industrial park by acreage in the Twin Cities metropolitan area, and one of the major generators of truck trips in the region. The park includes Airlake Airport, performing reliever functions for Metropolitan Airports Commission. Businesses in the industrial park are also served by both freight and short line regional service via the Canadian Pacific Rail. Because of the high number of commercial operations (barge terminals, truck terminals, manufacturing operations, etc.), a number of state trunk highways and interstate highways exceed 3,000 truck trips per day. The following table summarizes heavy truck traffic areas in the county, based on 2017 data from the Minnesota Department of Transportation: Table 3.6 Heavy Truck Traffic Areas in Dakota County Location Heavy commercial vehicles per day Highway 13 at 35W 4,700 35W from split to Highway 13 4,750-9,500 Highway 52 at Highway 55( Flint Hills Refinery) 4,200-6,500 Highway 55 from Highway 52 to Minnesota River 2,600-2,900 Highway 494 in Eagan and South St. Paul 6,000-7,500 Energy, Utilities, Communication Infrastructure Telecommunication Facilities Community cable television, local weekly newspapers, and electronic and print media in the seven- county Twin Cities area are a critical part of Dakota County's existing emergency response plan. Media locations, contact information, and preferred methods of receiving information are noted in the emergency response plan and are maintained and updated regularly by the Dakota County Communications Department. In addition to a variety of cable programming, local-access or community cable television operations are located in five Dakota County cities: Apple Valley(also serves Farmington and Rosemount), Burnsville/Eagan, Hastings, Lakeville, and Inver Grove Heights (Town Square TV,which serves seven northern Dakota County cities.) Page 39 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Power Facilities Publicly-and privately-owned energy suppliers operate in Dakota County and participate in emergency planning and response efforts. Detailed information on power facilities is not provided in this plan. Pipelines The County has more than 600 miles of pipeline,transporting natural gas, crude oil, refined petroleum products (gasoline,jet fuels) and other products. Detailed information is not provided within this plan. Public Water Supply Systems Fifteen public water supply systems serve the county, all operated by individual municipalities and regulated by the Minnesota Department of Health. Thirteen cities rely on groundwater for their drinking water source. West St. Paul and Mendota Heights use surface water supplied by the City of St. Paul. Unincorporated areas of the county are served mostly by private well systems. Wastewater Treatment Systems For most of the county, ensuring adequate wastewater treatment facilities to sustain projected population growth is the responsibility of the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services Division (MCES).The Council manages a series of complex collector systems and central treatment plants. Metropolitan Wastewater Treatment Facilities Metropolitan Council Environmental Services manages seven regional wastewater treatment facilities in the region, with four plants serving Dakota County. The Empire treatment facility was expanded from 12 to 24 million gallons per day(MGD) in 2008, allowing the closure of the Rosemount facility. A new pumping station and 10 miles of new pipe ensure that Rosemount residents continue to be served. Plants are shown on Figure 3.22. Table 3.7 Metropolitan Council Metro • Wastewater Treatment Plants d{dae, St Went rne�o�ro Paull So Capacity St p,, MCES Plant (MGD) Mendota g,r,h,l, Heights Lake Metro Plant,St. Paul 251 Seneca Inver Seneca Plant, Eagan 34 ■ Grove Eagan Haight, Hastings Plant, Hastings 2.3 - Eagles Point • Empire Plant, Empire 24 Metro Council Environmental Services(2021) Burnsville APO Valley Rosemount Nininger • Twp Hastings Municipal Treatment Facilities — Coates --- Har"nge The cities of Vermillion and Hampton Vermillion Twp V6I!nillIo t Ravenna Lakeville own and manage separate wastewater Empire Twp Twp •Empire !•mlfliOe Mershon Twp treatment facilities. Both facilities have capacity to handle additionalgrowth. `'rm'n"r°" p Y -T I.• .__ Hampton See Figure 3.22. • New Miesnlle Hampton Trier — Table 3.8 Rural City Wastewater Plants Eureka Two east lc Rock Twp Douglas Twp Hampton Twp Capacity City - (Gallons per Day) Rand°Rand olph Twp Waterford Vermillion Plant 54,000 Greenvale Twp Twp Sciota • Twp Hampton Plant 101,000 _ Northfield Figure 3.22 Wastewater Treatment Facilities Page 40 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Individual Sewage Treatment Systems(SSTS-subsurface treatment systems) More than 8,000 individual sewage treatment systems serve rural Dakota County. Per Ordinance No. 113, the County oversees construction, design, and inspection of septic systems in unincorporated shoreland. Outside of rural shoreland, communities oversee septic systems within their jurisdiction. Demographic and Economic Conditions Population Dakota County is the third most populous county in Minnesota,with a population of 439,882 (2020 US Census). The Metropolitan Council projects the county will have more than 515,000 people by 2040. Lakeville, Rosemount, and Farmington are expected to lead growth on the urban fringe. Table 3.9:Dakota County City and Township Populations in 2000,2010,and 2020(U.S.Census) City or Township 2000 Census 2010 Census 2020 Census Percent Change 2010-2020 Apple Valley 45,527 49,084 56,374 14.9 Burnsville 60,220 60,306 64,317 6.7 Castle Rock Township 1,495 1,342 1,350 0.6 Coates 163 161 147 -8.7 Douglas Township 760 716 748 4.5 Eagan 63,557 64,206 68,855 7.2 Empire Township 1,638 2,444 3,177 30.0 Eureka Township 1,490 1,426 1,373 -3.7 Farmington 12,365 21,086 23,632 12.1 Greenvale Township 684 803 796 -0.9 Hampton 434 689 744 8.0 Hampton Township 986 903 832 -7.9 Hastings(part) 18,201 22,172 22,152 -0.1 Inver Grove Heights 29,751 33,880 35,791 5.6 Lakeville 43,128 55,954 69,490 24.2 Lilydale 552 623 809 29.9 Marshan Township 1,263 1,106 1,153 4.2 Mendota 197 198 183 -7.6 Mendota Heights 11,434 11,071 11,744 6.1 Miesville 135 125 138 10.4 New Trier 116 112 86 -23.2 Nininger Township 865 950 865 -8.9 Northfield (part) 557 1,147 1,261 9.9 Randolph 318 436 466 6.9 Randolph Township 536 659 760 15.3 Ravenna Township 2,355 2,336 2,354 0.8 Rosemount 14,619 21,874 25,650 17.3 Sciota Township 285 414 460 11.1 South Saint Paul 20,167 20,160 20,769 3.0 Sunfish Lake 504 521 522 0.2 Vermillion 437 419 441 5.3 Vermillion Township 1,243 1,192 1,290 8.2 Waterford Township 517 497 538 8.2 West Saint Paul 19,405 19,540 20,615 5.5 Dakota County Total 355,904 398,552 439,882 10.4 Page 41 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 The following map shows population concentrations in the county, with highest densities in older communities of West St. Paul, South St. Paul, and Hastings. New high-density housing areas are also found in parts of Burnsville,Apple Valley, and Eagan. Population/Square Mile Lilydale _ South 0-1,000 Mendota St Paul f 1,001-2,000 Mendota Su iiiaFi -2,001-3,000 Meigtits Leka :l -3,001-4,000 -4,001-7,063 irr Grove Heghi Hum j -•ple „ s,� •nsemount NiningerT lilt • Valley F- n9s 11116 ��oot�s mi I.i- I . l La - i le Vermillion Empire Twp i Mars .wTwp— Ravenna Twp _ _ Verlion .f I` mil Twp Farmington ( Hampton • New Trier Miesville Castle ti Eureka Twp Rock Twp Hampton Twp Douglas Twp Randolph Randolph Twp Greenvale Twp Waterford Selota Twp Twp Northfield Figure 3.23 Population Densities,2020 Census Diversity The 2019 US Census Bureau ACS 5-Year data show that 18 percent of the county population identified as a group other than "White alone." Since 2000, racial and ethnic diversity has doubled in Dakota County. School children in the county are more diverse than the countywide data suggest. Data from the Minnesota Department of Education (MDE) show 37 percent of students enrolled in county schools were from Communities of Color in 2020. School children in Dakota County speak 128 languages other than English as their primary language at home. Housing Beginning in the 2008 Recession,the average and median sales prices of housing in Dakota County dropped significantly from the highs of the mid-2000s but began to rise again in 2011-2012 with the economic recovery. Figure 3.24 illustrates these trends. Page 42 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Figure 3.24 Median Sales Price of Residential Property for Dakota County Median Appraised Value of Single Family Properties in Dakota County $400,000_00 $366,552.87 $348,475.00 $350,000.00 $335,900.69 $316,362.66 $300,000.00 $29fi,53910 .06 280,231. $272,654 $262,707. .003 ,- $250,872.42 $250,000.00 $234,�46.2 ..-- • $200,000.00 $150,000.00 $100,000.00 $50,000.00 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 • About 70 percent of Dakota County's housing stock is of west - outh free-standing single-family 1o1 ,o • St Paul s st Aaul dwellings. Multi unit or Mendota s"Ah Heights Lakr �_ attached dwellings are about 20 percent of the county's ■ Inver vve :. housing. Eagan Heights • Seventeen manufactured housing parks are located 6"r within cities in the county Apple Valley .Rasema pat NlnknRyr • Twp Hastings and account for 3,800 units, i -or about about 3 percent of the Vermillion Twp 1 Ravenna total housing stock. Pre- Lakeville Empire Twp YeNrUqun rwp Ma rshan Twp manufactured housing parks • are shown in Figure 3.25. --.- _ Farmington - H1.mpton NnwTrier Mewl Eureka Twp Castle Rock Twp Hampton Twp Douglas Twp Randotph Twp l IWaterIorr4 R'ndalv6 Greenvale Twp Twp Sciora .•� .� Twp Narlhtir4d Figure 3.25 Manufactured Housing Parks in Dakota County Page 43 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Labor Statistics In 2018, Dakota County had a monthly average of 241,966 residents in the labor force.The number of people in Dakota County's labor force has consistently grown, however the rate of growth has been less than one percent annually since 2004. Roughly 51 percent of residents travel elsewhere for work,with Hennepin County, MN being the most likely destination.This is higher compared to the State as a whole, which is only 34 percent. Commute times for residents are also longer than the state average with almost 37 percent of residents commuting over 30 minutes to work. 191,363 jobs were located in Dakota County in 2019.Approximately 55 percent of workers commute in from other counties. Figure 3.26 shows changes in the job market in Dakota County over time. The COVID-19 Pandemic has had profound impacts on overall employment levels, earnings, labor markets, and commuting patterns. In mid-2021,the long-term implications of the pandemic and what economic recovery will look like in the near-term are unclear. Figure 3.26 Jobs in Dakota County 200,000 .mom 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Source:MN Department of Employment and Economic Development Income Levels Without adjusting for inflation, Dakota County's median household income (half of households earned less and half earned more) rose from $76,213 in 2014 to $86,036 in 2019. Dakota County ranks fourth out of the seven Twin Cities Metropolitan Area (TCMA) counties, behind Scott ($102,152), Carver ($101,946), and Washington ($96,671) (U.S. Census, American Community Survey). Dakota County's overall poverty rate of 6.27 percent in 2018 ranked in the third highest of metropolitan counties but has decreased from its 2013 high of 7.9 percent. Figure 3.27 Poverty in Dakota County Household poverty in Dakota (Counties) Percent of households below poverty level 15.00% 10 00% 7.91% 7.28% Recession 7.05% 6.60% 6.98% 5.10% 669% 5.0095 6 6.27% 5.62% 4.24% 4.89% 0 00% 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Oare Source US Census BureauAmetican CommunitySurvey Page 44 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Public Safety and Emergency Response Capabilities Collectively, Dakota County and its jurisdictions have equipment and the trained response personnel to cover most disaster situations. Existing facilities and equipment are intended to address local requirements, as well as support regional needs. Dakota County is considered a mutual aid county that provides and receives support from adjacent counties. This section summarizes emergency response capability. Medical Facilities Medical facilities in Dakota County include 34 primary medical health care clinics and three hospitals: • Fairview Ridges in Burnsville • Regina Medical Center in Hastings • Northfield Hospital in Greenvale Township Total acute-care inpatient capacity among these three hospitals is 244 beds. Each of these three hospitals has emergency room facilities. Although Dakota County has no designated trauma centers within its boundaries,the metro area is served by three level one trauma centers, each with air transport capability. • Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis (Hennepin County) • North Memorial Medical Center, Robbinsdale (Hennepin County) • Regions Hospital, St. Paul (Ramsey County) Fire Service Dakota County has three full-time, one partial full-time, and ten volunteer fire departments. Mutual aid agreements ensure coverage throughout the rural areas of Dakota County. Each department has the capability to respond to rescue, hazardous materials, and natural disaster incidents. Police Departments Eleven municipal police departments and the County Sheriff's Office provide law enforcement services in Dakota County. As with fire departments, city and county law enforcement agencies assist other jurisdictions as needed. The County Sheriff is the chief law enforcement officer for Dakota County. The Sheriff's Department provides police services to 13 townships and eight cities,for a coverage area of 355 square miles. The Sheriff's Department is headquartered in Hastings. Emergency Warning Systems The Dakota Communications Center serves as the Dakota County Warning Point. The Warning Point has 24-hour capability and is responsible for the receipt and proper dissemination of all notifications received. The established Warning Point notification procedure is as follows: 1. Notify key county government officials 2. Notify all affected municipalities 3. Activate the Emergency Alert System/Emergency Broadcast System for a: a. Weather Emergency b. Hazardous Materials Emergency c. Radiological Incident at Prairie Island Nuclear Plant 4. The municipalities in Dakota County are responsible for relaying any warning information they receive to their own public officials and residents. Page 45 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Outdoor Warning Sirens In the recent past, Dakota County's outdoor warning siren system activated by the Dakota Communications Center during tornado warnings and severe thunderstorms warnings with sustained wind speeds of 58 miles per hour or greater. Recent policy changes elevated the system activation wind speed for severe storms to 70 mph. The Dakota Communications Center is responsible for activating outdoor warning sirens for communities based on tornado warnings issued by the National Weather Service. On a regular basis,the Dakota County Emergency Preparedness Coordinator and emergency managers from each city review the outdoor warning siren activation policy and communicate any changes with the Dakota Communications Center. Severe weather warnings and recommended actions are listed below: Tornado or Severe Thunderstorm Watch: Weather conditions are such that there is a very good chance for the development of either severe thunderstorms or tornado producing thunderstorms in the watch area.The watch usually covers a large area.This information is available via NOAA Weather Radio, and local radio and television broadcasters. Actions: Citizens are advised to: ■ Monitor weather information sources and the weather itself for any changes that could endanger them. Check shelters and associated equipment. ■ Consider avoiding any outdoor activities. ■ If in a manufactured home,travel trailer, or recreational vehicle consider moving to a shelter as storms move into the area, before warnings are issued, especially if the storms are moving fast. Tornado Warning: A tornado has been seen or a thunderstorm is exhibiting characteristics that would indicate the possibility of a tornado forming. This information will be available via NOAA Weather Radio, and local radio and television broadcasters. Outdoor sirens will sound in targeted areas identified by the National Weather Service. Actions: Citizens are advised to: ■ If in the affected area,take shelter immediately. ■ If outside and not being immediately threatened by the severe weather, move indoors quickly. ■ If outside and immediately threatened,take cover by lying on the ground, preferably in a low area, safe from flying objects and flooding. ■ Do not drive in the area of a tornado or severe straight-line winds. Under most circumstances, inside a vehicle is one of the most dangerous places to be during a tornado or severe thunderstorm. Severe Thunderstorm Warning: A severe thunderstorm is associated with wind speeds of 70+ miles per hour, hail 3/ inch in diameter or larger, and heavy rain. This information will be available via NOAA Weather Radio, and local radio and television broadcasters. Dakota County's outdoor sirens will sound in targeted areas identified by the National Weather Service. Actions: Citizens are advised to: Treat this like a tornado warning. Seek shelter as recommended for a tornado. Community Notification System The Dakota Communications Center controls the activation of a Mass Telephone Notification System (MTNS) or"reverse-911" system. The system is used at the direction of local police,fire and government officials to notify the public of situations requiring protective action, such as a hazardous material spill, or requiring the public's assistance, such as a missing child or vulnerable adult. Page 46 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Register Your Number: Residents and people working in Dakota County can use the Dakota Communications Center Website to self-register their cellular telephone numbers, adding these to the MTNS telephone number database. Actions: Citizens are advised to self-register their cellular phone numbers so that they can be notified of an emergency that effects their location. Emergency Operations Center Direction and control of the Dakota County emergency response will be carried out at Dakota County's designated Emergency Operations Center(EOC),which has a 24-hour per day operational capability. Certain types of disaster response operations may require the Dakota Emergency Operating Center to be co-located with local jurisdictions. Vulnerable Populations Nursing Homes Our older population represents a demographic group that is very vulnerable to the hazards described in this document. Nursing homes warrant special consideration with respect to emergency planning. The Minnesota Department of Human Services licenses and inspects nursing homes. According to the department's website, Dakota County has: • 10 nursing homes with a total capacity of 938 beds (2021) Child Daycare Young children represent a demographic group that is very vulnerable to the hazards described in this document. Typically,young children are concentrated in daycares during the day. Like nursing homes, daycare facilities require specific emergency plans. The Minnesota Department of Human Services licenses and inspects commercial child-care centers in Dakota County. Individual child-care services (in- home) are licensed and inspected by the Dakota County Social Service Department. In Dakota County there are currently: • 155 licensed child-care centers with a capacity of 14,296 children (2021) • Approximately 467 actively licensed family child-care providers with a total capacity of roughly 5,533 children (2021) Homeless Populations In recent years in Dakota County,the number of people experiencing homelessness has increased, with nearly 1,750 people homeless and unsheltered in 2020-2021. Reasons for this increase include limitations in the affordable housing supply relative to income levels, but also increased outreach has improved estimation methods for tracking homelessness.The pandemic had multiple impacts on homelessness, including job losses, increased stress, and less ability for households to take in friends and relatives due to the need to work and school from home in limited space. Sheltering capacity substantially increased due to the pandemic in 2020 with the addition of hoteling agreements. The combination of the existing shelters serving homeless populations and hoteling provided 155 rooms in 2020, which sheltered varying numbers of individuals, couples, and families. Temporary Shelter Temporary shelters are defined here as overnight lodging supplying beds and basic sanitary facilities and designed for stays of short duration. These shelters include permanent facilities,such as motels, and short-term facilities, such as those that might be utilized by the Red Cross for emergency shelter. Temporary shelters become important in emergencies and disasters when a significant number of Page 47 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 people have been displaced from their normal places of residence. The Red Cross has Shelter Facility Agreements with five locations in Dakota County, with a total capacity of 803 beds.Additional and alternate sites can be identified, inspected and opened at the time of an event as needed. Page 48 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 SECTION IV - HAZARDS FACING THE COMMUNITY 44 CFR Requirement§201.6(c) (2) (i): [The risk assessment shall include a] description of the ... location and extent of all natural hazards that can affect the jurisdiction. The plan shall include information on previous occurrences of hazard events and on the probability of future hazard events. Developing effective hazard mitigation strategies for Dakota County requires an inventory and description of hazards that are most likely to occur. The following potential natural and man-made hazards were considered to be most relevant for the purposes of this plan. Table 4.1 Hazards Profiled Hazard Reason for Identification Civil Disturbance* Likely Adverse Impact Cyber Attack Frequency, likely adverse impact Dam Failure Likely adverse impact,geographic extent Drought Likely adverse impact,geographic extent Extreme Temperatures Frequency,geographic extent Flood (Flash and Overland) Frequency, likely adverse impact Hazardous Material Incidents Frequency, likely adverse impact, Infectious Disease Likely adverse impact,geographic extent Landslide Change in frequency, likely adverse impact Structural Fire Frequency, likely adverse impact Terrorism Likely adverse impact Tornado Frequency, likely adverse impact Violent Summer Storms Frequency, likely adverse impact,geographic extent Violent Winter Storms Frequency, likely adverse impact, geographic extent Wastewater Treatment Plant Failure Likely adverse impact,geographic extent Water Supply Contamination Likely adverse impact Wildfire Frequency *Added to the 2020 plan update due to increased risk concerns and recent occurrence in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. The following hazards were not profiled in this plan due to geographic location, low occurrence, or low potential for damage. Table 4.2 Hazards Not Profiled Hazard Reason for Omission Avalanche Geographic proximity Coastal Erosion Geographic proximity Earthquake Low occurrence Expansive Soils Low vulnerability Land Subsidence Low vulnerability Tsunami Geographic proximity Volcano Geographic proximity Hazard profiles in this section were developed from information provided by: • Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) • National Weather Service (NWS) • National Severe Storms Laboratory(NSSL) Page 49 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 • National Climatic Data Center(NCDC) • FEMA Flood Insurance Study and Flood Insurance Rate Maps (2011) • U.S. Geological Survey • U.S.Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) data on dams • Local media, library and historical records • Dakota County and participating communities Geographic location information is provided for each profiled hazard based on the impact areas of previous occurrences. For many hazards including drought, extreme temperatures, and violent summer and winter storms,the geographic extent of vulnerability is county-wide. A common set of definitions was established to estimate vulnerability and rank hazards based on: • Future frequency of occurrence • Likely warning time • Typical geographical scope • Likely adverse impact Hazard Definitions/Classifications Frequency of Occurrence: Probability-How often hazard can be expected to occur. 1=Unlikely:<1 percent probability of occurrence in the next 100 years. 2=Occasionally: 1-10 percent probability of occurrence per year, or at least one chance in next 100 years. 3= Likely: >10 percent but<100 percent probability per year,at least one chance in next 10 years. 4= Highly Likely: 100 percent probable in a year. Warning Time: How much time to alert people to hazard conditions 1=More than 12 hours 2=6-12 hours 3=3-6 hours 4=None-Minimal Geographic Extent: How large of an area would likely be affected 1=Localized 2=Community-wide 3=County-wide or greater Likely Adverse Impact: Magnitude/Severity/Extent of damage and disruption 1=Negligible: Isolated occurrences of minor property damage; minor disruption of critical facilities, and/or potential for minor injuries 2=Limited: Isolated occurrences of moderate to severe property damage; brief shutdown of critical facilities and/or potential for injuries 3=Critical: Severe property damage on a neighborhood scale;temporary shutdown of critical facilities, and/or injuries or fatalities 4=Catastrophic: Severe property damage on metropolitan or regional scale;shutdown of critical facilities, and/or multiple injuries or fatalities 44 CFR Requirement§201.6(c)(2)(ii): [The risk assessment shall include a] description of the jurisdiction's vulnerability to the hazard described in paragraph (c)(2) (i)of this section.This description shall include an overall summary of each hazard and its impact on the community. The following hazard profiles include a description, the geographic extent of susceptibility, information regarding previous occurrences, and an assessment of future vulnerability. Vulnerability is based on the common set of definitions/classifications outlined above. Page 50 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Natural Hazards in Dakota County Drought Hazard Description The NOAA Weather Service defines drought as "a period of abnormally dry weather sufficiently prolonged for the lack of water to cause serious hydrologic imbalance in the affected area." The severity of the drought depends upon the degree of moisture deficiency,the duration, and the size of the affected area. Drought is not an abrupt disaster, but rather the cumulative result of a persistent period of low precipitation. The effects of drought may not be noticed immediately but only become apparent after weeks or months. The effect to the water table may take up to a year or more to be realized. Short term drought effects include excessively dry soil, causing plant stress and crop failure. When rainfall is less than normal for several weeks, months, or years,the following may occur: stream and river flow declines, water levels in lakes and reservoirs fall, and water tables drop. Groundwater drawdown may cause wells to go dry, impacting residents with shallow private wells first. Economic impacts include lost revenue from crops or loss of livestock. Non-irrigated croplands are most susceptible to moisture shortages. Grazing land and irrigated agricultural lands are not impacted quickly as the non-irrigated, cultivated acreage, but their yields can also be greatly reduced. Irrigation wells could also go dry depending upon the severity of the drought and depth of the well. In addition, reductions in crop yields due to moisture shortages are often aggravated by wind-induced soil erosion. Under extreme drought conditions, lakes, reservoirs, and rivers can be subject to severe water shortages, as can deeper groundwater wells. If drinking water aquifer capacities become depleted, this would potentially impact water availability for municipal water supplies. Geographic Location Drought is a part of virtually all climatic regimes, including areas with high and low average rainfall. Minnesota generally and Dakota County, specifically, are vulnerable to drought. In Dakota County, agricultural irrigators and municipal water supplies are primarily dependent on groundwater resources. As severe droughts can affect the groundwater table, risks associated with drought are countywide and not confined to any particular community or geographic region of the county. Previous Occurrences Minnesota has experienced occasional severe drought conditions. Some counties have experienced agricultural droughts, leading to severe soil-moisture decreases with serious consequences for crop production. Drought regularly occurs in Dakota County. Tracking drought is challenging due to the many definitions and measurement protocols. The Drought Monitor website, a partnership among Federal agencies and the National Drought Mitigation Center at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln tracks drought conditions nationwide and provides drought information maps at a county level. The Drought Monitor synthesizes multiple drought related indices and impacts based on consensus of federal and academic scientists. Some of those indices include:the Palmer Drought Severity Index,the Climatic Prediction Center Soil Moisture Model(which takes observed precipitation and temperature and calculates soil moisture, evaporation, and runoff),the USGS Weekly Stream Flow Map (based on an average daily stream flow),the National Climatic Data Center's Standardized Precipitation Index(which analyzes precipitation based on soil moisture and groundwater storage), and the Objective Drought Indicator Blends(which approximates drought-related impacts that respond to precipitation such as wildfire danger,topsoil moisture, and pasture conditions). Page 51 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Table 4.3 lists the Drought Monitor's intensity ratings followed by a description of possible impacts. Five of the indices referenced above are also included on the Drought Monitor Severity Classification. Table 4.3 Drought Monitor: Drought Severity Classification Palmer CPC Soil USGS Weekly Standardized Objective Description Possible Impacts Drought Moisture Streamflow Precipitation Drought Index Model Indicator (Percentiles) Index(SPI) (Percentiles) Blends Abnormally Going into drought,short-term dryness -1.0 to-1.9 21-30 21-30 -0.5 to-0.7 21-30 Dry slowing planting,growth of crops or pastures;fire risk above average. Coming out of drought;lingering water deficits;pastures or crops not fully recovered. Moderate Some crop/pasture damage;fire risk -2.0 to-2.9 11-20 11-20 -0.8 to-1.2 11-20 Drought high;streams,reservoirs,or wells low; shortages developing,or imminent, voluntary restrictions requested. Severe Crop or pasture losses likely;fire risk -3.0 to-3.9 6-10 6-10 -1.3 to-1.5 6-10 Drought very high;water shortages common; restrictions imposed. Extreme Major crop/pasture losses;extreme fire -4.0 to-4.9 3-5 3-5 -1.6 to-1.9 3-5 Drought danger;widespread shortages or restrictions Exceptional Exceptional widespread crop/pasture -5.0 or less 0-2 0-2 -2.0 or less 0-2 Drought losses;exceptional fire risk;water shortages in reservoirs,streams and wells,creating water emergencies. Source:Drought Monitor http://drought.unl.edu The U.S. Drought Monitor(USDM) national map released every Thursday shows parts of the U.S. that are in drought.The USDM synthesizes the best available data and uses ground-truthing and information on drought impacts via a network of more than 450 observers across the country, including state climatologists, National Weather Service staff, Extension agents, and hydrologists. Using the Drought Monitor data sets detailed above as the best available,there is nearly a 12-percent chance of drought in any given growing season. Figure 4.1 shows Dakota County between 2000 and 2021 and indicates extended periods of moderate and/or severe drought in 2012, 2013, 2014, and 2015. Page 52 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Figure 4.1 U.S.Drought Monitor,Dakota County 2000-2021 eo�a- 80%- 70%- so%— BO%— 40%— 30%— 20%— 70%- 0% 4i, rot 11 ri r" r ti � d d t' ry �� d' re IS no I l71 E D2 M D3 M D4 U.S.Drought Monitor:Dakota County,MN Source:https://www.drought.gov/states/minnesota/county/Dakota As this update was being drafted, Minnesota was experiencing its worst drought in a decade, with substantial areas of the state in extreme and exceptional drought. In prolonged severe droughts, concerns arise in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area for public water supplies that draw from the Mississippi River. As occurred in the 1980's,August of 2021 saw the drying up of many small streams and exposure of areas of the Mississippi riverbed. Minnesota Map released:Thurs.August 19,2021 Data valid:August 11,2021 at 8 a.m.EDT Intensity y NoneO[DAhnoratel DDry] � � D1[Moderate Drought] orD2� (Severe Drought) - D3(Extreme Drought) AIRD4(Exceptional Drought) No Data filv it. Authors United States and Puerto Rico Author(s): Curtis Riganti,National Drought Mitigation Center Pacific Islands and Virgin islands Author(s): Brad Rippey,U.S.Department of Agriculture NPNIIIIIMM116. BEN- Figure 4.2 Minnesota Drought:August 2021 Table 4.4 shows the top 10 driest years recorded since 1891 with the greatest departure from "normal" annual precipitation. The normal annual precipitation at the Twin Cities International Airport (from 1971-2020) is 30.60 inches. Note: data do not reflect the drought of 2021. Page 53 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Table 4.4 Top Ten Driest Years at Twin Cities International Airport Since 1891 Year Yearly Total Precipitation Departure from Normal* 1910 11.54 inches -17.87 inches 1958 16.20 inches -13.21 inches 1976 16.50 inches -12.91 inches 1948 16.95 inches -12.46 inches 1936 18.47 inches -10.47 inches 1988 19.08 inches -10.33 inches 1974 19.11 inches -10.30 inches 1969 19.29 inches -10.12 inches 1925 19.41 inches -10.00 inches 1963 19.57 inches -9.84 inches Source:Minnesota Climatology Working Group.*Normal annual precipitation from 1971-2016(29.41 inches). Vulnerability The following table summarizes the overall vulnerability to drought: Frequency of Occurrence: Likely Warning Time: More than 12 hours Geographic Extent: County-wide Likely Adverse Impact: Limited Plans and Programs for Drought Water plan. The Dakota County 2040 Comprehensive Plan and the 2020-2030 Dakota County Groundwater Plan identify major and minor aquifers serving the county.The Groundwater Plan identifies goals, strategies, and tactics to address groundwater quantity concerns. Watering Restrictions.All municipalities in Dakota County have a Water Supply Plan and ordinances in place that allow them to enforce watering restrictions and bans if needed. Extreme Temperatures Hazard Description Extreme heat is a persistent period of temperatures significantly above normal, often accompanied by high humidity. Extreme heat can cause hyperthermia, or"heat stroke," in which the body cannot maintain proper temperatures. Severe cases may result in death. Children, elderly people, persons without air conditioning,the sick, disabled and overweight are at greatest risk of heat stroke, although anyone can be affected. Extreme heat can stress crops and livestock thus reducing yields and can cause widespread power outages from increased electrical demand from air-conditioning. Of weather-related hazards, extreme heat is among the deadliest. Heat Index (HI) measures the effect of combined heat and humidity on the human body, and accurately measures how hot it feels when the relative humidity(RH) is added to air temperature. An Excessive Heat Warning is issued within 12 hours of the onset of a heat index of at least 105°F for more than 3 hours per day for 2 consecutive days, or heat index more than 115°F for any period of time. An Excessive Heat Watch is issued by the National Weather Service when daytime heat indices in excess of 105°F (41°C) combined with nighttime low temperatures of 80°F (27°C) or higher are forecast for two consecutive days.The National Weather Service's Heat Index Chart shown below(Figure 4.3) shows the relationship of ambient air temperature and relative humidity to the likelihood of health risk. Page 54 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Figure 4.3 Heat Index Chart Temperature["F) 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 100 102 104 106 108 110 40 80 81 83 85 88 91 94 97 101 105 109 114 119 124 1 45 80 82 84 87 89 93 96 100 104 109 114 119 124 ' 50 81 83 85 88 91 95 99 103 108 113 118 124 1- 9. 55 81 84 86 89 93 97 101 106 112 117 124 60 82 84 88 91 95 100 105 110 116 123 E 65 82 85 89 93 98 103 108 114 121 = 70 83 86 90 95 100 105 112 119 as } :E 75 84 88 92 97 103 109 116 124 ' 80 84 89 94 100 106 113 121 85 85 90 96 102 110 117 90 86 91 98 105 113 122 95 86 93 100 108 117 100 87 95 103 1.1.2, 1. Likelihood of Heat Disorders with Prolonged Exposure or Strenuous Activity Caution Extreme Caution ■Danger •Extreme Danger Source:National Weather Service Dew point is the temperature to which air must cool at constant pressure to become saturated.The higher the dew point is,the more uncomfortable people feel. Minnesota's Climatology Working Group found that summer dew points in the Twin Cities increased over the past century by 0.46 of a degree. Extreme cold is a persistent period of low temperatures with moderate to strong winds resulting in dangerous wind chill temperatures. Exposure to extreme cold can lead to frostbite, hypothermia or death. The National Weather Service updated the Wind Chill Temperature index in 2001 (Figure 4.4)to describe the danger resulting from the combination of wind and temperature. Wind chill is based on the rate of heat loss from exposed skin caused by wind and cold. Figure 4.4 National Weather Service Wind Chill Chart Temperature{°F) Calm 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 -5 -10 -15 -20 -25 -30 -35 -40 -45 5 36 31 25 19 13 7 1 -5 -11 -16 - 2 -28 -34 -40 -46 -52 -57 -63 10 34 27 21 15 9 3 -4 -10 -16 -22 -28 -35 -41 -47 -53 -59 -66 -72 15 32 25 19 13 6 0 -7 -13 9 -26 -32 -39 -45 -51 -58 -64 -71 -77 20 30 24 17 11 4 -2 -9 -15 -22 -29 -35 -42 -48 -55 -61 -68 -74 -81 1 2.5 29 23 16 9 3 -4 -11 -17 -24 -31 -37 -44 -51 -58 -64 -71 -78 -84 E 30 28 22 15 8 1 -5 -12 9 -26 -33 -39 -46 -53 -60 -67 -73 -80 -87 35 28 21 14 7 0 -7 -14 -21 -27 -34 -41 -48 -55 -62 -69 -76 -82 -89 3 40 27 20 13 6 -1 -8 -15 -22 -29 -36 -43 -50 -57 -64 -71 -78 -84 -91 45 26 19 12 5 -2 -9 -16 -23 -30 -37 -44 -51 -58 -65 -72 -79 -86 -93 50 26 19 12 4 -3 -10 -17 -24 -31 -38 -45 -52 -60 -67 -74 -81 -88 -95 55 25 18 11 4 -3 -11 8 -25 -32 -39 -46 -54 -61 -68 -75 -82 -89 -97 60 25 17 10 3 -4 -11 -19 -26 -33 -40 -48 -55 -62 -69 -76 -84 -91 -98 Frosthiti Timis 30 minutes u 10 minutes u 5 minutes Wind Chill(aF)=35.74+0.62157-35.7501°.16)+0.42757 V°'16) Whari,T=AirT6mp4ratuwi'Fl V=Wind Spud(mph) Eflectf 1Jpvor Source:National Weather Service,www.nws.noaa.gov/om/windchill/index.shtml Geographic Location Located in the center of the continent, Dakota County experiences the extremes of summer heat and winter cold. Summer temperatures in Dakota County have exceeded 105°F, while winter temperatures have been as cold as-38°F. Heat and cold pose risks for people, animals, and infrastructure. Page 55 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Previous Occurrences Summer Heat History-July is the warmest month in Dakota County with an average high temperature of 83°F. The county typically experiences eight days of 90-degree or warmer temperatures in summer. The all-time high of 107°F occurred in 1977, during a five-day run of temperatures exceeding 100°F. On average, Dakota County can expect at least one day over 100°F every three to four years. The closest permanent weather station with the longest data history is located in Minneapolis. The following table provides dates on which the maximum temperature recorded at this station was at or greater than 104°F. Table 4.5 Temperatures at or above 104°F in Minneapolis,MN Since 1872 Max. Daily Temperature Years 108° (F) 1936 106° (F) 1934, 1936(3x) 105° (F) 1934(3x), 1936, 1988 104°(F) 1902 (5x), 1924, 1930(2x), 1951 (2x), 1954, 1962, 2000 Source:National Weather Service 1936 had five consecutive days with temperatures over 100 degrees and 14 consecutive days over 90 degrees. The National Weather Service compiles annual fatality statistics for several natural hazards. Between 2009 and 2019 in Minnesota, one heat-related fatality occurred in 2011, 3 heat-related fatalities occurred in 2012 and 1 heat-related fatality occurred in 2013. Winter Cold History-January is typically the coldest month in Dakota County,with average daytime highs of 22°F and average nighttime lows of 6°F. Maximum temperatures in January have been as high as 66°F and minimums as low as-38°F (Farmington 3NW Station.) The winter season typically produces 33 days averaging 0°F or lower, with 5 days averaging-20°F or lower. Temperatures below zero have occurred October through April. The closest permanent weather station with the longest data history is in Minneapolis. Table 4.6 summarizes dates with a minimum air temperature at or below-33°F in Minneapolis. Table 4.6 Temperatures at or below-33°F in Minneapolis,MN Since 1872 Year Max.Daily Temperature 1888 -41°(F) 1879 -39°(F) 1888 -37°(F) 1885, 1887 -36°(F) 1886, 1887, 1936, 1970 -34°(F) 1904 -33°(F) Source:National Weather Service The following table illustrates the number of consecutive days at or below temperatures of zero or below, -10 degree or below, or-20 degrees or below in Minneapolis. Page 56 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Table 4.7 Consecutive Days below 0°F or colder since 1872 in Minneapolis 0°(F)or Below -10°(F)or Below -20°(F)or Below Days Year Days Year Days Year 36 1936 20 1963 6 1899 23 1976-1977 12 1895 6 1996 21 1963 10 1899 5 1977 20 1966 9 1965 4 1899 4 1936 5 2009 - - - - 4 2019 - - - - 4 2021 - - - - Source:National Weather Service Low temperatures with strong winds create wind chills that put people and livestock at risk. A-15°F air temperature with wind speeds of 10 mile per hour creates a wind chill of-35°F. In the open under these conditions, frostbite can occur in minutes on exposed skin. The local National Weather Service office issues an advisory when wind chills of-25°F are expected. A Wind Chill Warning is issued when wind chills of-35°F are expected. From 2009 to 2019, the National Weather Service recorded 30 cold-related fatalities in Minnesota: four in 2019,two in 2018, two in 2017, eight in 2016, one in 2015, six in 2014, two in 2012, one in 2011, and four in 2009.The National Climate Data Center recorded three extreme cold weather events between 2016 and 2019: 1 16-17/2016: Wind chills in Dakota County reached -40° F 12/18/2016: Wind chills in Dakota County reached -50° F 1/29-31/2019: Wind chills in Dakota County reached -55° F Vulnerability The following table summarizes the overall vulnerability to extreme temperatures: Frequency of Occurrence: Likely Warning Time: More than 12 hours Geographic Extent: County-wide Likely Adverse Impact: Negligible Plans and Programs for Extreme Temperatures The following programs and projects address extreme temperatures in Dakota County: School closings. The county's school districts have a policy of closing schools when wind chills reach or are lower than -40°F, low visibility creates unsafe driving conditions, or heavy snow makes travel difficult. Local radio stations partner with school districts to make sure announcements are out by 6:00 am or earlier. In addition, many schools send out warnings via email. Heat advisories. The local National Weather Service office issues a Heat Advisory when the heat index maximum reaches 105°F or greater, with a minimum nighttime heat index of 75°F or greater for at least 48 hours. Wind chill warnings. The local National Weather Service office issues a Wild Chill Advisory when wind chills of-25°F are expected. A Wind Chill Warning is issued when wind chills of-35°F are expected. Page 57 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Automated weather stations. Some of the school districts have automated weather stations. This enables school personnel to monitor current weather conditions like wind,temperature and humidity on a real-time basis to provide up-to-the-minute information in case conditions change rapidly and action is required. Flood (Flash and Overland Flood) Hazard Description Flooding is the inundation of land caused by the rise and overflow of a body of water. Floods most commonly occur as a result of heavy rainfall causing a river system or stream to exceed its normal carrying capacity. Flooding is one of the most pervasive natural hazard threats in Minnesota,with potential impacts to public safety, housing, property, and infrastructure. Two types of flooding occur in Dakota County: riverine (overland)flooding and flash flooding. Riverine flooding occurs when a waterway exceeds its 'bank full' capacity and inundates adjacent floodplain. Floodplain is the area that is inundated by the 100-year flood (a flood that has a 1 percent chance in any given year of being equaled or exceeded). Riverine flooding is affected by the intensity and distribution of rainfall, soil moisture, seasonal variation in vegetation, and water-resistance of the surface areas caused by urbanization. Flash flooding is localized, resulting from intense rainfall across a limited geographic area. During extended periods of intense rainfall, storm water conveyance systems can be overwhelmed, resulting in neighborhood flooding. • '. ;;;..:,.. In 1969, Minnesota enacted the State Floodplain Management Act (Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 103F),which emphasizes a comprehensive flood protection approach that includes nonstructural measures, such as I•w � I floodplain zoning regulations, flood insurance, - flood-proofing, and flood warning and response :Jill• wroR Ar'a„ava pill planning. Bylaw, Minnesota's flood prone _HE y3 '' .. communities are required to: 1) adopt floodplain management regulations when p g *= � adequate technical information is available to identify floodplain areas and 2) enroll and maintain eligibility in the National Flood .s. Insurance Program (NFIP) so residents can purchase flood insurance. The Floodplain Management Act was amended in 1987 to establish a state cost-sharing grant program to help local government units plan for Figure 4.5 1965 Flooding at South St.Paul and implement flood hazard mitigation Stockyards(Dakota County Historical Society) measures. The Department of Natural Resources(DNR) is the state agency with overall responsibility for implementation of the State Flood Plain Management Act. Local floodplain regulatory programs, administered by county government for the unincorporated areas and by municipal government for the incorporated areas, must comply with federal and state floodplain management standards. Both federal and state standards identify the 100-year floodplain as the minimum area necessary for regulation at the local level. These regulations are intended to protect new Page 58 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 development and modifications to existing development from flood damages when locating in a flood prone area cannot be avoided. Dakota County formally adopted a shoreland zoning and floodplain management ordinance in 1973 in response to Minnesota Statute 103G and Minnesota Rule 6120. The ordinance regulates use and orderly development of shorelands within the unincorporated areas of the County,to promote public health, safety, and welfare, and to protect, preserve, and enhance natural resources. The ordinance also regulates use and development of floodplain areas within the unincorporated areas of the county to minimize loss of life, threats to public health and safety, and private and public economic loss caused by flooding. Floodplain provisions of this ordinance comply with the rules and regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program codified as 44 CFR Parts 59-78,to maintain the county's eligibility in the National Flood Insurance Program. Participating cities administer their own floodplain management ordinance. Geographic Location Flooding can occur almost anywhere in Dakota County. One method for identifying geographic locations of flood prone areas is FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMS). Table 4.8 below gives descriptions of the various flood zone areas as defined on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps for Dakota County. Table 4.8 Flood Zones Included in Flood Insurance Rate Maps,Dakota County Zone Flood Hazard Description A No Base Flood Elevations Determined AE Base Flood Elevations Determined AH Flood depths of 1 to 3 feet(usually areas of ponding); Base Flood Elevations determined. AO Flood depths of 1 to 3 feet(usually sheet flow on sloping terrain);average depths determined. For areas of alluvial fan flooding,velocities not determined A99 Area to be protected from 1 percent annual chance flood by a Federal flood protection system under construction; no Base Flood Elevations determined. V Coastal flood zone with velocity hazard (wave action); no Base Flood Elevations determined. VE Coastal flood zone with velocity hazard (wave action); Base Flood Elevations determined. X Areas of 0.2 percent annual chance flood;areas of 1 percent annual chance flood with average depths of less than 1 foot or with drainage areas less than 1 square mile;and areas protected by levees from 1 percent annual chance flood. D Areas in which flood hazards are undetermined, Source:FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map FIRM panel for Dakota County Effective Date 12/2/2011. Page 59 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Figure 4.6 illustrates flood prone areas in Dakota LilyrbI.. st South County a n d is a Ma!Mom wp of se P' NOPi 45 Annual Chance generalization of the H,.dot, Siamh ♦0.2%Annual Chance Height. Lalu combined Flood Insurance Rate Map flood boundaries. The map illustrates the Helq hts general flooding sources urreyllle "''SS'ss, within the county, most Nininger Twp notably the floodplain of the A Ya eY Rommetint- k R„„ county's four major rivers: ----trr — — 1- `...s- - the Mississippi,the nc{ takevill. Iles f -- Minnesota,the Vermillion, enTw. Raven Aio • million~ -• Twp and the Cannon. .m L. Twp fwr 7 D H. {fla�,/ilwer Z'„'�� mptan J Xea TISu MIex91k Eureka Twit Rhell Twp HamptonQr_ 1 _RaMnlp�)�- l J.,' ndalvh Twp 'Arnie Twp SN.T" Northfield Figure 4.6 Dakota County Flood Prone Areas Dakota County's Flood Insurance Study describes the major flooding issues in the county: Minnesota River: in Burnsville, Eagan and Mendota Heights. Draining over 16,000 square miles above Burnsville,the river is subject to wide variations in stage and discharge, causing frequent flooding. Notable flood years include April 1965, when peak flow reached 117,000 cubic feet per second, and April 1969, when peak flow reached 84,600 cubic feet per second. Protection measures include dikes around a Burnsville floodplain quarry and other industries. Flood- proofing measures also protect Xcel Energy's Black Dog plant. Mississippi River: flows through a well-defined channel during normal flow. Discharges north of Hastings are regulated by the USACE Lock and Dam No. 2 in Hastings, and discharges south of Hastings are regulated by the USACE Lock and Dam No. 3 in Goodhue County. The lock and dam system was constructed to maintain navigation depths. During flooding, dam gates are open and the river flows unrestricted. Floods occur mostly in spring from snowmelt. Damage from past floods has been restricted to a few residential, commercial, and municipal areas located in the low-lying floodplain immediately adjacent to the river. Protection measures include a series of levees in South St. Paul and Inver Grove Heights. In 1968, the USACE completed 2.5 miles of permanent flood barrier to protect packing plants and the South St. Paul sewage plant. In 1969, a 4,100-foot section of was constructed, averaging 14 feet in height. The upstream end of the levee connects with the flood barrier provided for South St. Paul. Vermillion River: the river main stem flows from southeastern Scott County northeast across Dakota County in a clearly defined channel through Farmington, Empire, and Vermillion to Hastings. In Page 60 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Hastings,the river drops approximately 90 feet over a small dam and natural waterfall, continuing to the Vermillion Slough and to the Mississippi River. During flood periods the river overflows its banks and floods a major portion of the valley upstream of Hastings. Major past floods on the Vermillion River occurred in Farmington in September 1938,April 1952,April 1965, March 1967, and March 1969. Several tributaries have potential flooding impact to the cities of Farmington, Hampton, Hastings, Lakeville, Miesville and Randolph. Protection measures include a levee along the left descending bank of the river upstream of the County Highway 47 Bridge to prevent direct overbank flow. This reach is also influenced by floodwaters from downstream, with the result that the levee does not provide 1-percent annual chance flood protection. A 1978 USACE flood project provides 1-percent annual chance flood protection to a residential area along the Vermillion River from Peavey Mill to an area immediately upstream of the County Highway 47 Bridge. Cannon River:About 14 miles of the Cannon River either flow through Dakota County or form its boundary with Goodhue County. Randolph is the only city in Dakota County that is vulnerable to flooding from the Cannon River and Lake Byllesby, an impounded reservoir on the Cannon River. Keller Lake and Crystal Lake: in Burnsville. The lakes drain to the Minnesota River through storm sewer and pond systems and have experienced sustained high water levels in the recent past. Flooding occurs after heavy thunderstorms when runoff enters lake storage. Protection Measures: In 1974, an equalizer pipe was added to ensure that the two lakes are at the same level during periods of high water, and an outlet structure was added. New development has been accompanied by construction of stormwater storage ponds. Lake Marion: in Lakeville. Flooding generally results from extended runoff events. High-water levels were recorded on Lake Marion in 1947, 1952, 1953, 1975, 1976, and 1993, and have caused damage to homes around the lake that are below the elevation of the lake's outlet, 983.2 feet NAVD. Protection Measures: An outlet control structure and a 30-inch culvert were installed in 1985. The normal water level on Marion Lake is limited to the elevation on the outlet. Specific flood depths,velocities and volumes are available at the local level through the individual Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) and the community specific Flood Insurance Study (FIS)through the local floodplain administrator. Previous Occurrences The NOAA National Climatic Data Center(NCDC) Severe Storm Event database includes 19 flood events in Dakota County between 2005 and 2019, with no deaths and property damage exceeding$1.1 million (Table 4.9). Table 4.9 Summary of Flood Events for Dakota County,2000-2019 Location Date Flood Type Property Damage Eagan 7/7/2000 Flash Flood $20,000,000 Region 4/1/2001 Flood $200,000,000 Region 5/1/2001 Flood $0 Countywide 8/3/2002 Flash Flood $0 Countywide 10/4/2005 Flash Flood $0 Northern County 10/4/2005 Flood $0 Eagan 8/8/2009 Flash Flood $0 South St. Paul 6/25/2010 Flash Flood $0 Burnsville/Lakeville 6/26/2010 Flash Flood $0 Page 61 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Location Date Flood Type Property Damage Farmington 8/10/2010 Flash Flood $0 Rosemount 8/13/2010 Flash Flood $0 Southern County 9/23/2010 Flood $0 Miesville 6/14/2012 Flash Flood $1,000,000 Burnsville 7/13/2013 Flash Flood $150,000 Eagan 6/1/2014 Flash Flood $0 Burnsville 6/18/2014 Flood $0 Miesville 8/17/2014 Flash Flood $5,000 Hampton 8/17/2014 Flash Flood $5,000 Mendota 9/17/2015 Flash Flood $0 Burnsville 8/16/2016 Flash Flood $0 Lakeville 8/16/2016 Flash Flood $0 Miesville 7/19/2017 Flash Flood $0 Burnsville 3/17/2019 Flood $0 Total $221,160,000 Source: National Climatic Data Center,NOAA.Note:Zero(0)values may indicate missing data Vulnerability The following table summarizes the overall vulnerability to overland and flooding. Overland Flood Flash Flood Frequency of Occurrence: Likely Highly likely Warning Time: 6-12 hours None-minimal Geographic Extent: Community-wide Localized Likely Adverse Impact: Limited Limited Plans and Programs for Flood Dakota County's Shoreland and Floodplain Management Ordinance(Ordinance 50). Local governments have authority to adopt regulations designed to minimize flood losses. Dakota County's Shoreland and Floodplain Management Ordinance applies to the unincorporated areas of the county(cities have jurisdiction over incorporated areas). The purpose of the ordinance is "...to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare and to minimize ...losses [life, property, health and safety, disruption of commerce and governmental services, extraordinary public expenditures of flood protection and relief, and impairment of the tax base]..." Dakota County has the authority to administer the National Flood Insurance Program within the 13 unincorporated townships covering the lower two-thirds of the County. Participating cities have their own floodplain ordinances modeled on the DNR minimum standards and administer their own floodplain program. FEMA-designated floodplains identified on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps have been digitized and incorporated into the County's GIS coverage available to all communities. In 2003, Dakota County entered into a Cooperating Technical Partnership with the Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA)to modernize the Flood Insurance Rate Maps and accompanying Flood Insurance Study (FIS)to a countywide digital format. FEMA issued its final letter of map determination in June 2011 with an effective date of Dec. 2, 2011 for the Flood Insurance Rate Maps. NFIP participating communities in the county amended their respective floodplain management ordinances and adopted the new FIS and digital flood insurance rate maps. County flood area map and controls. Dakota County adopted a shoreland zoning and floodplain management ordinance in 1972.The floodplain management portion of the ordinance mirrors the Page 62 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 requirements in the MN Department of Natural Resources' model floodplain ordinance. The ordinance includes specific land use and zoning regulations related to floodplain development. The Flood Insurance Study(FIS) and accompanying Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMS) guide staff in determining floodplain location and elevation. National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). In 1968, Congress created the National Flood Insurance Program in response to the rising costs of taxpayer funded disaster relief. The Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA), Mitigation Division manages the NFIP and oversees the floodplain management components of the program,with state coordination through the Minnesota Department of Resources, Waters Division. Dakota County's authority in administering the NFIP as it pertains to FIRMS,the FIS and the Dakota County Shoreland and Floodplain Management Ordinance is within the 13 unincorporated townships covering the lower two-thirds of the County. The following cities within Dakota County have participated in the National Flood Insurance Program: Apple Valley, Burnsville, Coates, Eagan, Farmington, Hampton, Hastings, Inver Grove Heights, Lakeville, Lilydale, Mendota, Mendota Heights, Miesville, Randolph, Rosemount, South St. Paul, and Vermillion. The communities of New Trier, Sunfish Lake and West St. Paul also participate, although these three communities do not have any Special Flood Hazard Areas identified within their corporate boundaries. City flood map and controls. NFIP-participating communities administer their own floodplain ordinance modeled on the DNR minimum standards and administer their own floodplain programs. FEMA-designated floodplains identified on Flood Insurance Rate Maps have been digitized and incorporated into the County's GIS coverage available to all communities. Department of Natural Resources (DNR), Division of Waters. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Division of Waters has an advanced flood forecast and warning system. The DNR provides technical floodplain assistance through local area hydrologists. Emergency Operations Plan. The Dakota County Emergency Operations Plan outlines procedures for the County in response to a variety of hazards. During the course of a flood event in Dakota County,the Emergency Management Director and Emergency Preparedness Coordinator works with local officials to ensure public health and maintain transportation routes. National Weather Service. The National Weather Service provides many storm prediction and flood monitoring applications. The Severe Storm Spotters Network. This National Weather Service program enlists trained volunteers to spot severe storm conditions and report this information to the NWS. Trained severe weather spotters in Dakota County report directly to their respective public safety answering points (PSAP's)when severe weather is observed. Severe Weather Awareness Week. Dakota County Emergency Management personnel annually conduct severe weather training workshops in the spring for school, hospital and nursing home personnel. Severe Weather Shelters. The County recommends that all communities require shelters for manufactured home park residents or provide information on evacuation routes to safe shelters elsewhere per state ordinances. Severe Weather Warning System. The county and cities have emergency sirens to warn residents in the event of severe summer weather. Six county public safety answering points (PSAP's) activate the siren system for either weather or hazardous materials incidents. Page 63 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 U.S.Army Corps of Engineers. The Corps of Engineers monitors flood gauges at their lock and dam facilities (Lock and Dam No. 2 in Hastings) and employ policies and procedures during flood events. Infectious Disease Outbreak Hazard Description Infectious diseases are caused by organisms that can be spread by humans, animals, food, water, and the environment. These diseases are contagious or communicable, meaning they can be spread from person to person. Infectious diseases can affect and cause serious illness in healthy individuals of all ages though the very young, older adults and persons with underlying health conditions are at increased risk for the most serious consequences. Despite advances in medical technology,vaccine development, and treatment modalities, infectious diseases continue to pose a significant public health problem globally and locally. The emergence of previously-unknown infectious diseases,the spread of diseases beyond traditional geographic locations,the spread of diseases from animals to humans, and the re-emergence of diseases eliminated or significantly reduced are at the forefront of public health concern. Lastly, bioterrorism, or the intentional spread of infectious diseases, poses an additional threat for which the county is required by federal agencies (HHS and the CDC) to develop response plans. Many infectious diseases are preventable and controllable with accurate diagnosis, collection of accurate assessment data (such as surveillance data for specific conditions), outbreak detection and investigation, and development of appropriate control strategies(short- and long-term) based on epidemiologic data. These activities require close collaboration among public health professionals at the state and local levels, medical practitioners, and clinical laboratories. The prevention of infectious diseases also requires the involvement of researchers, regulatory agencies, educational systems, community-based organizations, and volunteer and private groups. Significant infectious disease hazards identified by the Dakota County Public Health Department (DCPH) include: Tuberculosis Tuberculosis (TB) is a potentially serious infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis bacteria and is spread from person-to-person through the air. TB usually affects the lungs, but it can also affect other parts of the body, such as the brain, the kidneys or the spine. TB bacteria enter the air when a person with TB of the lungs or throat coughs or sneezes. A person inhaling air that contains TB bacteria may become infected. Most people who become infected with the TB bacteria do not develop symptoms of disease. TB infection is usually treated with 9 months of one antibiotic, and TB disease is generally treated with multiple antibiotics for a period of 6 months or longer. Infected contacts of TB cases are encouraged to receive treatment to prevent development of TB, and those found to have TB disease are treated and are also investigated. Much of the tuberculosis occurring in Dakota County and Minnesota is in foreign-born persons from areas of the world where TB is common. Proper screening of newly-arrived foreign-born persons and others with risk of tuberculosis, along with appropriate treatment, is crucial for TB control. Dakota County conducts contact investigations on all active infectious TB cases which can sometimes result in large numbers of people exposed in settings such as worksites and schools.The following table illustrates the number of active TB cases in Dakota County. Table 4.10 Number of Active TB Cases/Year Residing in Dakota County Year 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Cases 6 7 14 7 9 Page 64 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Pertussis Dakota County has been experiencing a resurgence of pertussis (whooping cough) since 2004, and pertussis is considered endemic in Minnesota. Pertussis is caused by the Bordatella pertussis bacteria and infects the lungs, causing a severe cough that lasts 4-6 weeks. Pertussis can be severe and even fatal in young infants. Pertussis is a vaccine-preventable disease and primary vaccination rates are high in the county. Waning immunity in school age children and adults who have not received a pertussis booster(or Tdap) continue to be sources of pertussis disease with numerous outbreaks especially in school settings. Use of antibiotics early in the disease reduces transmission with exclusion from school or work for 5 days. Use of prophylactic antibiotics in those exposed is another control measure. In certain settings, vaccination with Tdap is beneficial for reducing outbreaks. New federal guidance has also expanded the use of Tdap vaccine for adults and pregnant women in an effort to reduce pertussis disease in our community.The following table illustrates the number of Pertussis cases in the county. Table 4.11 Number of Pertussis Cases Per Year in Dakota County Year 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Cases 82 42 26 47 9 Measles Measles is a highly contagious disease caused by the measles virus. Initial symptoms often include fever, cough, runny nose, and watery eyes.The most identifiable symptom of measles is a rash that usually starts 3-5 days after symptoms begin. Measles spreads when an infected person coughs or sneezes. When susceptible people breath contaminated air or touch an infected surface and then touch their eyes, nose, or mouth,they can become infected. Measles virus can live for up to 2 hours in an airspace after the infected person leaves.An infected person can spread measles starting four days before through four days after rash onset. Measles can be effectively prevented with the measles vaccine.Two doses of the measles vaccine are about 97 percent effective at preventing measles disease. Measles is considered to be eliminated from the U.S. which means it is no longer constantly present. However, measles is still common in many parts of the world, and every year there are cases of unvaccinated travelers who bring measles into the U.S. These cases can quickly lead to outbreaks if the disease is spread to other susceptible people. Seasonal Influenza Types A and B influenza viruses cause epidemics of disease almost every winter and can vary in severity. In the United States these epidemics can cause illness in 5 to 20 percent of the population.The CDC estimates that between 1976 and 2007 annual influenza-related deaths in the U.S. ranged from 3,000 to 49,000. On average 200,000 people are hospitalized yearly for conditions associated with influenza. Annual influenza vaccination can prevent illness from A and B influenza. Each winter's flu vaccine is formulated to protect against the A and B strains expected to circulate that season. Flu vaccination is now recommended for all populations and especially children to reduce the spread of influenza. DCPH offers free flu vaccine to eligible uninsured children and adults each flu season as well as at walk-in and appointment clinics. Anthrax Preparedness planning for a possible bioterrorist event is a local public health responsibility. Dakota County Public Health receives funding from the Centers for Disease Control via the MN Department of Health to develop and exercise plans for mass dispensing of antibiotics or vaccine depending on the agent released. Response plans that specifically address an anthrax attack of the general population or of the United States Postal Service are well-developed and exercised. Inhalational anthrax is caused by spores produced by Bacillus anthracis bacteria. Page 65 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 The first symptoms of inhalational anthrax are similar to cold or flu symptoms and can include a sore throat, mild fever and muscle aches. Later symptoms include cough, chest discomfort, shortness of breath, and eventually pulmonary edema and death. Anthrax is not known to spread from person-to- person. Exposed individuals need certain antibiotics within 48-72 hours or before onset of symptoms for best outcomes. Anthrax is classified as a Category A agent and can be used as a bioterrorism weapon. In 2001, anthrax was deliberately spread through the postal system by sending letters with powder containing anthrax. The level of risk of an anthrax attack is determined by state and federal authorities. Infectious Disease Pandemic Hazard Description A pandemic is a global outbreak of a contagious infectious disease. SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) SARS-CoV-2 is a novel coronavirus that causes the disease COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 was first identified at the end of 2019, and it quickly began spreading around the world. In March 2020 the World Health Organization declared the COVID-19 outbreak a global pandemic. On March 6, 2020 the Minnesota Department of Health confirmed the first case of COVID-19 in Minnesota, and on March 12, 2020 the first case was identified in Dakota County. SARS-CoV-2 is transmitted through virus-containing respiratory droplets and airborne particles that are exhaled by an infected person.The incubation period for SARS-CoV-2 is up to 14 days after exposure, and some people may become infected but never develop symptoms (asymptomatic). Some people who get COVID-19 continue to experience long-term effects weeks or months after they became infected; this is called long COVID. Treatment of COVID-19 primarily involves treating the symptoms and supportive care. A number of vaccines have been developed that are very effective at preventing COVID-19. Other preventative measures include isolation and quarantine, physical distancing, and face masks and coverings. COVID-19 is likely to continue to be transmitted in susceptible communities and populations, but effective vaccination strategies can sufficiently reduce transmission and the emergence of viral variants so that community mitigation strategies to control widespread transmission are no longer needed. Similar to the 1918 Spanish Influenza pandemic,the COVID-19 pandemic has presented distinct surges in infection rates and deaths or"waves."The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants (viral mutations) has contributed to resurgences in different parts of the world at different times. As of plan drafting in late 2021,the U.S. was experiencing its fourth and fifth waves, largely driven by the highly contagious Delta and Omicron variants. Table 4.12 COVID-19 Infections and Deaths(March 2020-December 16,2021) Geographic Area Infections Deaths World* 272,683,000 5,334,798 U.S.* 50,453,655 803,181 Minnesota** 975,447 10,057 Dakota County*** 70,918 611 * https://coronavirus.ihu.edu/ ** https://mn.gov/covid19/data/covid-dashboard/index.isp *** https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/a654394207ac44239af0792303664db3 Page 66 D RAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Pandemic Influenza Pandemic influenza is a virulent human flu that causes a global outbreak of serious illness. A flu pandemic occurs when a new influenza virus emerges for which people have little or no immunity and for which no vaccine exists, such as the H1N1 influenza in 2009-2010. While it did not cause as severe morbidity and mortality as predicted, it infected normally healthy children and young adults at much higher rates than seasonal flu as well as pregnant women and people with chronic health conditions. Dakota County Public Health provided 12,494 H1N1 vaccinations,the department's largest vaccination program ever and total number vaccinated by all providers in Dakota County was 89,276 or 23 percent of the population. There were 6 deaths and 85 hospitalizations in the County, with 61 deaths and 1,821 hospitalizations in the state. Nationally,there were an estimated 89 million infected with H1N1 and 18,300 deaths. Substantial effort went into developing pandemic flu response plans in the years preceding the H1N1 epidemic. Federal funding from the CDC to support and enhance the public health infrastructure and response was critical in supporting DCPH's planning and response efforts. Stockpiles of antivirals helped reduce the severity of disease and numerous large and small community-based clinics were held though vaccine supply shortages prevented much advance planning of clinics as well as rationing of vaccine to those most at risk. Public health pandemic flu preparedness remains a priority at the federal, state and local levels. Lessons learned from the H1N1 pandemic were extremely valuable in facing the challenges of COVID-19, even with the far greater reach, magnitude, and duration of the COVID-19 pandemic. DCPH continues to learn from the H1N1 and COVID-19 response efforts, especially strategies for reaching marginalized and special needs populations during emergencies. Previous Occurrences Dakota County, along with the rest of the world, has been impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, highlighting the need for infectious disease preparedness and mitigation planning. Dakota County has also continued to experience clusters of other infectious diseases including tuberculosis and pertussis. Dakota County's entire population is susceptible to exposure to infectious diseases. Only those who are immune as a result of vaccination or prior infection or who are receiving preventive treatment for known/anticipated exposure will be protected. Large population concentrations and communities with large numbers of susceptible persons are at particular risk for outbreaks in the event of an introduction of an infectious disease in the community. Vulnerability The following table summarizes the overall vulnerability to Infectious Disease Outbreaks and a Pandemic event. Infectious Disease Outbreak Pandemic Frequency of Occurrence: Likely Occasional-Likely Warning Time: More than 12 hours More than 12 hours Geographic Extent: Community to County-wide County-wide or Greater Likely Adverse Impact: Critical Catastrophic Plans and Programs for Infectious Disease, Pandemic, and Public Health Hazards Emergency Operations Plan. The Dakota County Emergency Operations Plan outlines procedures for the County in response to a variety of hazards. Included is a public health annex that provides guidelines and strategies for dealing with infectious disease outbreaks. Page 67 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Disease Prevention &Control Common Activity Framework. The Dakota County Public Health Department works collaboratively with the Minnesota Department of Health to address reportable infectious diseases that are listed in Chapter 4605.7040 Disease and Reports and to plan for public health emergencies. Dakota County Public Health operates within a system of guidelines and standards set by the state (MDH). Regional infectious disease response collaborative planning. The local public health departments in the Twin Cities metro region coordinate regional infectious disease planning through various workgroups,to address public health emergencies. This collaboration focuses on response activities, including activation of mass dispensing sites for distribution of vaccines and/or antibiotics. Metro Health & Medical Preparedness Coalition.The coalition is comprised on hospitals, clinics, emergency manager, emergency medical services, long term care, public health, and hospice and home care from across the Twin Cities metro.The goal of the coalition is to facilitate collaboration around planning, response, and recovery activities for events or emergencies with public health and medical implications. Health Alert Network system. The Dakota County Public Health Department receives health alerts from the Minnesota Department of Health about disease outbreaks or infectious disease threats that could have an impact locally or elsewhere. Health department staff, in turn,forwards these alerts to appropriate community partners in settings such as healthcare, public safety, schools, local government, etc. Communication and consultation for local healthcare providers. Dakota County Public Health Department staff provide consultation services on an as-needed basis for healthcare clinics located in the county.The Public Health Department also has various communication channels to reach clinic and hospital partners with important public health news and updates. Media outreach. The Dakota County Public Health Department works with local media to provide information to the public in the event of an infectious disease outbreak or impending threat. Public information. The Dakota County Public Health Department posts information about current infectious disease threats and prevention and control of infectious disease on its website. The Public Health Department contributes to Emergency and Community Health Outreach (ECHO), which broadcasts public health advisories and emergency alerts for Minnesota's refugee and immigrant populations via Twin Cities Public Television in six languages besides English. Vaccination program. The Dakota County Public Health Department offers a variety of vaccinations for children and adults. The department participates in the Minnesota Vaccines for Children program to provide low-cost vaccinations for children with financial need. Isolation and quarantine plan. The Dakota County Public Health Department has an isolation and quarantine plan in accordance with state laws and guidelines. The plan outlines the process and responsibilities necessary to keep persons ill with specified diseases isolated and persons exposed to specified diseases quarantined to prevent further spread of disease. The plan will assure that these persons are provided with health care, outside communication, and necessary supplies. Environmental health program. The Dakota County Public Health Department has a limited capacity to respond to environmental health hazards. It primarily provides consultative services to citizens regarding indoor air, radon, and mold and provide inspection services for childhood lead and public health nuisances. Public Health works collaboratively with state agencies to mitigate, respond and recover from environmental emergencies. Page 68 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Landslide Hazard Description Landslides in Minnesota are often associated with steep slopes and lighter erodible soils. As rainfall intensities and runoff increase, soils are more likely to become saturated and more prone to subsidence. Landslides were not addressed in previous version of this plan but were added as a hazard in 2016 after recent occurrences in Dakota County. Geographic Location Landslides in Dakota County are a concern in limited locations with steep slopes,typically in the bluff areas along major rivers. Areas with potential for landslides are as follows: • River bluffs along adjacent to the Big Rivers trail in Lilydale, Mendota, and Mendota Heights. • River bluffs above CSAH 54 in Ravenna Township • Steep slopes along the MRRT in Inver Grove Heights, Rosemount, and Nininger Township Previous Occurrences Dakota County received 12 to 13 inches of rain in June 2014, which created saturated soil conditions and generated mudslides in bluff areas along the Minnesota and Mississippi Rivers in the Twin Cities. Portions of State Highway 13 in Mendota Heights were closed after landslides covered a section of road with mud several feet deep. A portion of Dakota County's Big Rivers Regional Trail was closed until slopes were stabilized and repairs were made. In the City of Mendota, Upper D Street experienced two failures. On the upside slope of Upper D Street, a significant landslide buried the road and a stretch of approximately 75 feet of road sank and was falling away due to saturated ground on a river bluff. If this area slipped, it would destroy as many as six homes. Residents were notified to evacuate during engineering evaluation of the area for further slide potential. The heavy rain that contributed to the landslides in Dakota County also caused landslides at the University of Minnesota Hospital in Minneapolis and Scott County. Many areas of widespread flooding occurred in southern and southeastern Minnesota along the Mississippi and Minnesota rivers,for which Minnesota requested and received a presidential disaster declaration in July 2014. A serious landslide occurred in the Ramsey County portion of this river bluff area in 2013, north of the boundary and Dakota counties. Two children on a school field trip to the Lilydale Regional Park fossil beds were killed when saturated soils and gravel on the slope above them collapsed. Since the last plan update in 2016, landslides have occurred occasionally in the same areas ►R:� r a44. 4 - along the Mississippi and Minnesota rivers. `n Multiple minor slides have occurred on the Big • , �. .r •= :. _' Rivers Trail in the recent past. Two slides inar,''+` 2020 resulted in trail closures. One slope failure undermined a section of path and a second T failure deposited rock and debris on the trail. y '•- - Landslides and erosion on the bluff above : :: ` County Highway 54 has deposited debris on the • roadway and road closures after large events. Figure 4.7 June 2014 Mudslide,Big Rivers Regional Trail, Dakota County Page 69 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Vulnerability The following table summarizes the overall vulnerability to landslide. I Frequency of Occurrence Occasional I Warning Time None-Minimal I I Geographic Extent Localized I I Likely Adverse Impact Limited I Plans or Programs for Landslide Trail Protection Program. Dakota County Facilities Maintenance Staff(Grounds Maintenance) works with Transportation staff, consultants and the Dakota County Soil and Water Conservation District during the design of trails to mitigate the potential for erosion and landslides. Roadway Protection Program. Dakota County Transportation works with outside engineering consultants and the Dakota County Soil and Water Conservation District during the design of road projects to mitigate the potential for erosion and landslides. Tornado Hazard Description The National Weather Service defines a tornado as a "violently rotating column of air extending from a thunderstorm to the ground." Tornados are the most violent of all atmospheric storms and are capable of tremendous destruction. Wind speeds can exceed 250 mph, and damage paths can be more than one mile wide and 50 miles long. In an average year, more than 900 tornados are reported in the United States, resulting in approximately 80 deaths and more than 1,500 injuries. Although tornados are documented on every continent, they occur most frequently in the central U.S. east of the continental divide. Atmospheric and topographic conditions cause warm and cold air masses to meet in the center of the country, creating unstable,fast moving air at high pressure that can cause a tornado to form. Tornados occur most frequently from April to June.While most tornados occur between 3:00 and 9:00 p.m., a tornado can occur at any time of day. Prior to 2007, tornado intensity was measured by the Fujita (F) scale shown below. Table 4.13 Fujita Scale Wind Estimate Fujita Scale (Mph) Typical Damage FO <73 Light damage.Some damage to chimneys; branches broken off trees;shallow-rooted trees pushed over;sign boards damaged. F1 73-112 Moderate damage. Peels surface off roofs; mobile homes pushed off foundations or overturned; moving autos blown off roads. F2 113-157 Considerable damage. Roofs torn off frame houses; mobile homes demolished; boxcars overturned; large trees snapped or uprooted; light-object missiles generated;cars lifted off ground. F3 158-206 Severe damage. Roofs and some walls torn off well-constructed houses;trains overturned; most trees in forest uprooted; heavy cars lifted off ground and thrown. F4 207-260 Devastating damage.Well-constructed houses leveled;structures with weak foundations blown away some distance;cars thrown and large missiles generated. FS 261-318 Incredible damage.Strong frame houses leveled off foundations and swept away; automobile-sized missiles thrown 100+meters(109 yards);trees debarked; Source:NOAA Storm Prediction Center,www.spc.noaa.gov/faq/tornado/f-scale.html Page 70 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 The Fujita scale has been updated to the Enhanced Fujita scale. Both scales estimate wind speed based on the degree of damage. The new scale provides more damage indicators for different structures and accounts for construction type and materials. The Enhanced Fujita Scale is shown in Table 4.14. Table 4.14 Enhanced Fujita Scale(EF) Enhanced Fujita Scale(EF) EF Wind Estimate(MPH) EFO 65-85 _ EF1 86-110 _ EF2 111-135 EF3 136-165 EF4 166-200 EF5 Over 200 Source:National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Storm Prediction Center, www.spc.noaa.gov/faq/tornado/ef-scale.htmi Geographic Location As a weather-based phenomenon,tornados can occur and impact any portion • (� `._,-• ._ __. of the planning area. Based —+-_.ril' ,,, �' s on analysis bythe National s•s..E ._ Severe Storms Laboratory, 'j I _ Dakota County is located in a _ } I _ .•-.— region of the U.S.that - ' experiences a moderate ,.._.,_ r frequency of tornado occurrences. Figure 4.8 - shows `Significant' (>_F1) Pew +�`' tornados from 1986-2015. •0.20 0.10.0.00 0.60.0.60 066.0.00 0.90 1.00 Haan Number of EF1♦Tornado Days per Year Within 25 Miles of a Pointy 1966-2015 Figure 4.8 Significant Tornado Occurrences by Location,1986-2015 Source:Storm Prediction Center,NOAA Previous Occurrences The National Weather Service documented four tornado fatalities in Minnesota in the past decade. A review of historical tornado events in Dakota County from 1965 to 2019 is presented in Table 4.15. Table 4.15 Dakota County Tornado Events 1965-2015 Location Date Magnitude(Fujita Scale) Property Damage Dakota 6/05/1965 F1 $3,000 Dakota 6/15/1967 FO $25,000 Dakota 5/15/1968 F2 $250,000 Dakota 7/13/1969 F1 $25,000 Dakota 7/15/1969 F1 $3,000 Dakota 7/14/1971 FO $25,000 Dakota 5/09/1973 F1 $250,000 Dakota 6/28/1979 FO $25,000 Dakota 4/29/1981 F1 $250,000 Dakota 7/15/1982 F1 $25,000 Dakota 5/13/1987 F1 $3,000 Dakota 5/13/1987 FO $0 Page 71 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Location Date Magnitude(Fujita Scale) Property Damage Dakota 7/27/1987 F1 $250,000 Hastings 7/06/1996 FO $0 Castle Rock 3/29/1998 F2 $0 Hastings 3/29/1998 FO $0 Castle Rock 8/12/1999 FO $0 Northfield 5/09/2001 F2 $7,000,000 Lakeville 9/09/2001 FO $0 Empire 7/10/2008 FO $0 New Trier 8/19/2009 F1 $25,000 Northfield 7/14/2010 FO $20,000 Waterford 7/14/2010 FO $1,000 Waterford 7/14/2010 F1 $50,000 Farmington 8/13/2010 F1 $750,000 Burnsville 11/10/2012 FO $150,000 Mendota Heights 11/10/2012 FO $50,000 Lilydale 11/10/2012 FO $100,000 Randolph 9/20/2018 FO $0 New Trier 9/20/2018 FO $0 Castle Rock 8/13/2019 FO $0 Total $9,280,000 Source:National Climatic Data Center(NCDC). Note:zero(0)values may indicate missing data. 1. , 10111'rid, i 6,1'W s-_.ilk ,�"F ..}JL -fit � +7 .+.S t - } ..,t . ' '''.. ' • -. ..'.': ._. ,.5 * f_ .vim: . • ! '•'T'~ *_.!- D - ,` -LI.flea'.. .5# . , ,_J i, .-. .• Figure 4.9 Castle Rock Tornado 1920 Dakota County Historical Society A map of significant tornado events in Dakota County is illustrated below. Page 72 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 lydale Srn,rl, EF Rating(Tornado Count) we: Saint row. EF-0 (14) Mendota;' Saint au! Paul &arra EF-1 (11) iMendota Sunfish Heights Lake EF-2 (3) f EF-3 (1) Inner EF-0 (a) Grove EF-5 (0) Eagan Heights Burnsville IV Apple Rosemount TllningeC • Valley Hastings Coates Lakeville vermillion Ravens. . — Emplrr —.L. VerntllIton Fa Hampton New Tde MI- le, Eureka Rra Douglas — I Randolph Waterford Randolph Greenvale Scmta - r� Ncrthlfeld Figure 4.10 Tornado Events in Dakota County Vulnerability The following table summarizes the overall vulnerability to tornadoes. Frequency of Occurrence: Likely Warning Time: None-Minimal Geographic Extent: Community-wide Likely Adverse Impact: Critical Plans and Programs for Tornadoes Skywarn Storm Spotter Network. This program, sponsored by the National Weather Service (NWS), enlists the help of trained volunteers to spot severe storm conditions and report this information to the NWS. No tornado warning is given unless the storm has been spotted by someone or is confirmed by NWS radar reports. Severe Weather Awareness Week. Dakota County, its cities, and local media all provide information to the general public and to target audiences on severe weather awareness. Severe Weather Shelters. The County recommends that all communities require shelters for manufactured home park residents or provide information on evacuation routes to safe shelters elsewhere per state ordinances. Severe Weather Warning System. The county and cities have emergency sirens to warn residents in the event of severe summer weather. Six county public safety answering points (PSAP's) activate the siren system in Dakota County for either weather or hazardous materials incidents. Page 73 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Debris Management Plan. Environmental Resources Department regulates and provides guidance on management of solid waste.The County's debris management plan offers general guidance, resources, and an application for emergency waiver of solid waste requirements.An update of the plan was initiated in 2021. Violent Summer Storms Hazard Description Violent summer storms include thunderstorms, lightning, hailstorms and windstorms, which can occur with humid air moving upward because of unequal surface heating, lifting of warm air along a frontal zone or diverging upper-level winds that draw air up beneath them. Major summer storm types include: Air mass thunderstorms (also called scattered thunderstorms)typically develop in the warm, humid air of summer months; form in the afternoon in response to solar heating; and dissipate quickly after sunset. Air mass thunderstorms are generally less severe than other types of thunderstorms, but can produce downbursts, brief heavy rain, and hail over 3/4 inch in diameter. Dry thunderstorms are generally high-altitude storms where lightning is observed, but little if any precipitation reaches the ground. Most of the rain produced by the thunderstorm evaporates into relatively dry air beneath the storm cell. Severe thunderstorms can produce winds of at least 58 mph (50 knots), hail at least 3/" in diameter, and structural damage. Derechos are widespread, long-lived, straight-line (non-rotational) windstorms associated with a fast- moving group of severe thunderstorms known as mesoscale convective systems. Derechos can cause hurricane-force winds,tornadoes, heavy rains,flash floods, and destruction over a wide swath that can reach many miles in length. Components of thunderstorms include lightning, high wind and hail as described below: High Wind: Severe thunderstorms form in areas with a strong vertical wind shear that forces the updraft into the mature, most intense stage of the thunderstorm. Wind speed is measured in knots (1 knot= 1.15 mph). Table 4.16 below shows an appended Beaufort Wind Scale and the relationship of wind speed in knots, miles per hour, and typical effects on land. Table 4.16 Appended Beaufort Wind Scale Wind Speed(Knots) Wind Speed(MPH) Typical Wind Effects on Land Less than 1 Less than 1.15 Calm,smoke rises vertically 1 to 4 1.15 to 4 Smoke drift indicates wind direction,still wind vanes 4 to 7 4 to 8 Wind felt on face, leaves rustle,vanes begin to move 7 to 11 8 to 13 Leaves and small twigs constantly moving, light flags extended 11 to 17 13 to 20 Dust, leaves,and loose paper lifted,small tree branches move 17 to 22 20 to 25 Small trees in leaf begin to sway 22 to 28 25 to 32 Larger tree branches moving,whistling in wires 28 to 34 32 to 39 Whole trees moving, resistance felt walking against wind 34 to 41 39 to 47 Whole trees in motion, resistance felt walking against wind 41 to 48 47 to 55 Slight structural damage occurs,slate blows off roofs Seldom experienced on land,trees broken or uprooted, "considerable 48 to 56 55 to 64 structural damage" 56 to 64 64 to 74 Substantial structural damage 64+ 74+ Potentially major structural damage Source:NOAA Page 74 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Figure 4.11 illustrates strong wind events (straight line)that have occurred in Dakota County. - sorrl, Wind Speed(Event Count) LilyAafe S.I 0I3F} ns � Mendota San[. • Fail pLake ail I-79 miles per hour(98) nia ti"k4;th \ �71.92 mikes per hWr(('f) Heights ••I — •Irrver Grove. Eagan Heights • •Burnsville ■ 0 I 1 aPPk Rosemount Mouser — Valky i lio logs Ls • Coates �' Lakerllk Vermillion - Rar nna Empire Marshall _ • Vermillion i rningh I ■ moon New Trier/ —k • Eureka Castle Douglas • ■ Rock dpmplen • Randolph Greenvale Watertord ■& RoePh iota`�'- _�" •• • Northfield Figure 4.11 Significant Wind Events in Dakota County Lightning: Rising and descending air in the thunderstorm separates positive and negative charges, with lightning the result of the buildup and discharge of energy between positive and negative charge areas. Lightning poses extreme hazards. According to NOAA, an average of 20 million cloud-to-ground lighting flashes are detected every year in the continental United States. About half of all flashes have more than one ground strike point, so at least 30 million points on the ground area are struck in an average year. Lightning is a deadly natural hazard in the U.S.,just behind floods and flash flood events, causing approximately 100 deaths and 500 injuries annually. Hail: Hail is defined as ice precipitation with a diameter of 5 to 190 millimeters (0.2 inch to 7.4 inches). Hail develops in the upper atmosphere as ice crystals bounced about by high velocity updraft winds. The ice crystals accumulate frozen droplets and fall after developing enough weight. Hailstorms are most common in the middle latitudes and are generally brief in duration. Large downdrafts in mature thunderstorm clouds provide the mechanism for hail formation. A hailstorm ordinarily occurs in mid to late afternoon during the passage of a cold front or during a thunderstorm. The severity of hailstorms depends on the size of the hailstones,the length of time the storm lasts, and whether it occurs in developed areas. Hailstorms can cause widespread damage to homes and other structures, automobiles, and crops. While the damage to individual structures or vehicles is often minor,the cumulative costs to communities, especially across large metropolitan areas, can be significant. Figure 4.12 shows locations of significant hail events in Dakota County. Hail size and potential impact from hailstorms is outlined in the following scale provided by NOAA in Table 4.17. Page 75 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 I;rydale sru<h Hail Size(Event Count) L Sint —Up Io 1"(81) Mendot Saint • •kul Paul —1"Ie 2•(34) .1Mrr�ait.Xsh , +lelghts Lake Greater than 2"l51 • 1• Inv e r Eagan Heights Burnsville RPP� d110 R0irun[ Hlnlpper � hey I-Iailngs - Coates I 1 • Lakeville Vermlll ion N•;riiii•i Empire Marshan • Farmington • Ve rind Son *minion New Trier Missoula • Enreka Castle Duerr Rock. Fiampinn -- — ' Randolph i- -- C, no O RalndWph rraal. ,Watrrford &Iota �`1r`,_.� • Northfield Figure 4.12 Significant Hail Events in Dakota County Table 4.17 Combined NOAA/TORRO Hailstorm Intensity Scales Size Intensity Diameter Comparative Size Typical Impacts HO Hard Hail up to 0.33" Pea No damage H1 Potentially 0.33-0.60" Marble or Slight damage to plants,crops _ Damaging Mothball H2 Potentially 0.60-0.80" Dime or grape Significant damage to fruit,crops,vegetation Damaging H3 Severe 0.80-1.2" Nickel to Quarter Severe damage to crops,glass and plastic structures; paint and wood scored H4 Severe 1.2-1.6" Half Dollar to Widespread glass damage,vehicle bodywork Silver Dollar damage H5 Destructive 1.6-2.0" Silver dollar to Golf Wholesale destruction of glass,damage to tiled Ball roofs,significant risk of injuries H6 Destructive 2.0-2.4" Lime or Egg Aircraft bodywork dented, brick walls pitted H7 Very destructive 2.4-3.0" Tennis ball Severe roof damage, risk of serious injuries H8 Very destructive 3.0-3.5" Baseball to Orange Severe damage to aircraft bodywork H9 Super Hailstorms 3.5-4.0" Grapefruit Extensive structural damage. Risk of severe-fatal injuries to persons caught in the open _ H10 Super Hailstorms 4+" Softball and larger Extensive structural damage. Risk of severe-fatal injuries to persons caught in the open _ Sources:National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration(NOAA),Tornado and Storm Research Organization. Page 76 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Geographic Location Thunderstorms occur across a broad region of the U.S.that includes all areas of Dakota County. As shown in Figure 4.13 below, Dakota County is located along a band of the northern U.S. that experiences winds equal to or greater than 50 knots several times per year. Figure 4.13 Intense Thunderstorm Wind Regions,U.S. 1986-2015 - - -) '� ti qv , � I _ �. � ;_.)— _ _ i+ .. • j--1 '', Sit'. p eihmatik Prediction 1y Ger ie -1.—..?• <1 1-7 2-3 3-4 4-5 5-6 6-7 7+ Mean Number of>50•knot Wind Days per Year Within 25 Miles of a Point 1956-2015 Source: Storm Prediction Center, NOAA, Storm Prediction Center WCM Page (noaa.gov) Previous Occurrences According to the National Climatic Data Center, 210 thunderstorms were reported for Dakota County from 1960 through 2019, with nineteen injuries and $181.15 million in property damages. In twenty of these events, wind gusts exceeded 70 knots (estimated). Since 2000, Dakota County has received federal public assistance funds after two federally declared disasters related to severe storms: DR-1333, declared on June 27, 2000, paid $122,000 to Dakota County, and DR-4069, declared on July 6, 2012, paid Dakota County$2.4 million for storm-related damages. Dakota County received $1.4 million from the State of Minnesota for storm-related damages that occurred in June and July of 2014, and $7 million for sever storm damage in September of 2016. Lightning impacts all regions of Dakota County. Fifteen reported lighting strikes occurred from 1960 through 2015,with a total of$2.43 million in property damages. Lightning struck a park picnic shelter in Lakeville in August of 2020,with three people requiring medical attention. The following map shows Minnesota with a low to moderate frequency of lighting occurrences. The flash density of lightning for Dakota County is 1 to 4 flash occurrences per square kilometer per year. Page 77 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 7 ter. s15!, .aye V; - >K Rash Dana* n.em.ep motor • •..-. I le ■ b National Lightning Detection Network - ':`� b ZODS-2D14 ■ 'b ■ ssb .5 * .a VAISALA Figure 4.14 Lightning Flash Density per Square Kilometer per Year Based on NCDC records from 1960 through 2019,there were 190 hail events of at least 0.75" in diameter: on at least 50 occasions, hail 1.75" or larger in diameter has occurred, and on 5 occasions hail 2.50" or larger has occurred. Five of these events reported damage, cumulatively totaling$123.5 million. This damage assessment is most likely under reported. Vulnerability The following table summarizes the overall vulnerability to violent summer storms. Frequency of Occurrence: Highly Likely Warning Time: 3-6 hours Geographic Extent: Community-wide Likely Adverse Impact: Critical Plans and Programs for Violent Summer Storms Skywarn Storm Spotter Network. This program, sponsored by the National Weather Service (NWS), enlists the help of trained volunteers to spot severe storm conditions and report this information to the NWS. Severe Weather Awareness Week. Dakota County, its cities, and local media all provide information to the general public and to target audiences on severe weather awareness. Severe Weather Shelters. The County is recommending that all communities require shelters for manufactured home park residents or provide information on evacuation routes to safe shelters elsewhere per state ordinances. Severe Weather Warning System. The Dakota Communications Center serves as the County Warning Point, with 24-hour capability. The Warning Point is responsible for receipt and proper dissemination of all severe weather notifications issued by the National Weather Service or called for directly by first responders in the field based on direct observations. Debris Management Plan. Environmental Resources Department is regulator and advisor for management of solid waste.The County's debris management plan offers general guidance, a list of resources, and an application for emergency waiver of solid waste requirements.An update of the plan was initiated in 2021. Page 78 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Z: ;&-. ^A �' a .40111111ANOL... iii em '"-�dLJ6 'N,1.: -,sa.:.._il N - i �. . y . fit,. Y, 11-'. .• yt"': i+,-,,OF, .r:"^"4,e';u.. ..„, - .+ ^,4 � 'air. 4, .. Yam'. Tornado Castle Rock Minn. May 0920 Public School Figure 4.15 School Destroyed in 1920 Castle Rock Tornado,Dakota County Historical Society Violent Winter Storms Hazard Description Violent winter storms can include sleet, ice,freezing rain, heavy snow, or blizzards (high winds and blowing snow). Event severity depends on the amount and extent of snow or ice,temperature, wind speed, and duration. Severe winter weather can disrupt essential systems such as utilities, transportation, and telecommunications. In Minnesota, a heavy snow event is generally defined as six or more inches in a 12-hour period, and eight or more inches in a 24-hour period. Snow is considered heavy when visibilities drop below one-quarter mile regardless of wind speed. Ice storms produce damaging accumulations of ice during freezing rain situations. Significant ice accumulations (1/4 inch or greater) pull down trees and utility lines, resulting power and communication outages, and make walking and driving extremely dangerous. Extreme cold often accompanies or follows a winter storm, especially from December to February. Exposure to extreme cold can lead to life-threatening frostbite, hypothermia or illness. See Extreme Temperatures earlier in this section. Geographic Location Dakota County is in the upper mid-continent region known for severe winter conditions, and usually experiences at least one of each of the above types of winter storms at least annually. Winter storms are nearly always large scale,frequently with statewide or region-wide impact. Previous Occurrences From 1995 to 2019, the National Climatic Data Center recorded the following severe winter events: • 18 heavy snow events, occurring in 1996 (5 events), 1999, 2000, 2001, 2005, 2008 (2 events) and 2019 (3 events) • 4 blizzards, occurring in 2009, 2010, 2018, and 2019 • 3 ice storms, occurring in 1996 (2 events) and 1998 • 59 total winter storm events over two decades,with an event nearly every year Page 79 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Vulnerability The following table summarizes the overall vulnerability to violent winter storms. I Frequency of Occurrence: Highly likely I Warning Time: More than 12 hours I I Geographic Extent: Community-wide I I Likely Adverse Impact: Critical I Plans and Programs for Violent Winter Storms The following programs and projects are in addition to the ones already mentioned for violent storms: School closings. School districts close schools when wind chills are lower than -40° F, low visibility creates unsafe driving conditions, or heavy snow makes travel difficult. Local radio stations partner with school districts to make sure announcements are aired by 6:00 am or earlier. Wind chill warnings. The local National Weather Service office issues a Wild Chill Advisory when wind chills of-25°F are expected. A Wind Chill Warning is issued for wind chills of-35°F. Automated weather stations. Some school districts have automated weather stations. This enables staff to monitor current conditions like wind and temperature on a real-time basis to provide up-to-the-minute information in case conditions change rapidly and action is required. Wildfire Hazard Description A wildfire is uncontrolled fire spreading through vegetative fuels. Wildfires often begin unnoticed, spread quickly, and are often signaled by dense smoke. Natural causes, such as lightning strikes, can initiate wildfires Human activities can also cause wildfire through debris burns, arson or carelessness. Wildfire behavior is based on fuel supply,topography and weather conditions, especially dryness. Topography affects the movement of air and fire over the ground surface. The slope and shape of terrain can change the rate of speed at which fire travels. Geographic Location Due to the volume of brush,the risk of wildfire is highest along the river bottoms of the Minnesota River, in Eagan and Burnsville, and the Vermillion River, south of Hastings. Land adjacent railroad to tracks is another concern, as sparks from trains can ignite grass fires. Previous Occurrences According to the Minnesota State Fire Marshal, more than 1,600 annual wildfires incur estimated losses of more than $13 million dollars statewide. Several small wildfires have occurred in Dakota County over the past two decades, in the Minnesota River bottoms and other natural areas. Vulnerability The following table summarizes the overall vulnerability to wildfire. Frequency of Occurrence: Occasional Warning Time: None-Minimal Geographic Extent: Localized Likely Adverse Impact: Negligible Page 80 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Plans and Programs for Wildfire Fire districts/departments. Dakota County is served by various city and rural fire departments, which often assist each other on larger fires, including wildfires. DNR information and training. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) seasonal wildfire risks statewide. Firefighters in Dakota County participate in annual wildfire training classes offered by the DNR.The DNR also works with firefighters in promoting their"Fire Smart" program, which is a fire prevention program involving local public schools. DNR also monitors wildfires and issues "Red Flag" warnings when conditions are favorable for wildfires. State land management. The DNR manages Fort Snelling State Park and the Minnesota Valley State Recreation Area,which are both partly within Dakota County and are located within river bottoms where wildfire may be more likely to occur. DNR has established procedures to address wildfires within these areas. DNR also conducts prescribed burns in its Wildlife Management Areas. Federal land management. The US Fish and Wildlife Service manages the Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge along the Minnesota River corridor,with wildfire control procedures. County land management. Dakota County Parks manages more than 5,000 acres of natural areas, and uses controlled burns as a prairie maintenance tool, under DNR permitting. Prescribed burns temporarily reduce vegetative fuel loads. Technological and Human-Induced Hazards in Dakota County Civil Disturbance Hazard Description Title 18 of the United States Code defines civil disorder and lists crimes associated with civil disorder. Section 231 of Chapter 12 defines civil disorder as: "any public disturbance involving acts of violence by assemblages of three or more persons, which causes an immediate danger of or results in damage or injury to the property or person of any other individual...(a)(1)...use, application or making of any firearm, or explosive or incendiary device, or technique capable of causing injury or death to persons...or...(a)(2)...transports or manufactures for transportation in commerce any firearm, or explosive or incendiary device, knowing or having reason to know or intending that the same will be used unlawfully in furtherance of a civil disorder...or...(a)(3)...commit any act to obstruct, impede, or interfere with any fireman or law enforcement officer lawfully engaged in the lawful performance of official duties incident to and during the commission of a civil disorder...". Civil disorder can result when groups or individuals believe that their needs or rights are not being met by society or current political systems. When disruption requires intervention to maintain public safety, prevent injuries and deaths, and avoid significant property damage, it has become civil disturbance. Civil disturbance covers a broad range of actions, some of which may violate criminal law, and can include riots, acts of violence, insurrections, unlawful obstructions, and protests that disrupt law and order.These actions can be precipitated by a broad range of events, such as economic instability, human-caused or natural disasters that disrupt infrastructure, racial tension, religious conflict, and political conflict. A civil disturbance event may have more than one precipitating situation and can involve multiple groups with different intentions and agendas, making them highly complex situations. Geographic Location For Dakota County, civil disturbance may be more likely to occur in urban areas near public institutions (state, county, and city offices) and areas that can accommodate large numbers of people. Civil unrest can occur in commercial areas and can involve major transportation routes, such as freeways. Page 81 D RAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Previous Occurrences Civil disturbance events in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area date back to the 1800's. The following table identifies several events with documented casualties (injuries and/or deaths) and damages. Table 4.18 Civil Disturbance Events in the Twin Cities with Documented Injuries,Deaths,or Damages Dates Event Injuries _ Deaths Damages May 16-Aug 21, 1934 Minneapolis General Strike, union strike 26+ _ 4 unknown July 20-23, 1967 Minneapolis Riots(Long Hot Summer of 1967), racial 24 0 $4.2M tensions May 26-June, 2020 Aftermath of George Floyd murder by Minneapolis 2 $550+M Police, racial tensions. Metro wide impacts, nation- wide impacts Aug 26-28,2020 Minneapolis False Rumors Riot, racial tensions 2 0 June 13, 2021 Aftermath of Winston Smith killing in Minneapolis, 4 1 racial tensions Vulnerability Civil disturbance can affect the following: Social Element Potential Impacts Population: Physical harm,fear, and disruption from normal activities Responders: Targets for violence, encounter interference in carrying out their duties Operations: Disruption in normal operations and essential services Property: Damage through violence, arson, and looting Government Facilities: Targets for protests and/or violence Infrastructure: Targets for protests and/or violence News Media: Can become targets for violence Economic Stability: Long-term impacts to targeted areas Public Confidence: Long-term decline in confidence in government to stem violence and damage The following table summarizes the overall vulnerability to civil disturbance. Frequency of Occurrence: Likely Warning Time: 3 to 6 hours I Geographic Extent: County-wide or greater I I Likely Adverse Impact: Critical I Plans or Programs for Civil Disturbance Cooperation with state and federal officials. Dakota County officials work with state and federal officials on domestic preparedness efforts, such as the Minnesota Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, and the Department of Health. Mutual Aid Agreements. Cities and the county have several mutual aid agreements to ensure assistance to partners in a disaster. Agreements include labor and equipment.The County Special Operations Team (SOT) and South Metro SWAT are supported by mutual aid agreements. Emergency Operations Plan (EOP). Dakota County's EOP outlines procedures that guide response in a broad range of disasters, and addresses command, operations, logistics, planning, communications, and finance. Procedures for requesting activation of the National Guard are included in the EOP. Page 82 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Activation of Emergency Operations Center(EOC). Dakota County's secure EOC provides dedicated space for assembling its emergency operations team with the necessary technology, equipment, and resources. Continuity of Operations Plan (COOP).The COOP guides county response to ensure that its critical business services continue to operate under emergency conditions. Emergency Response Training and Exercises.The county and its partners regularly conduct training tabletop and field exercises for a range of disasters. The Dakota County Mobile Field Force regularly conducts quarterly training. County Public Awareness and Information Outlets. County resources to notify and update the public include an Integrated Public Alert and Warning System (IPAWS), webpage, Social Media, and traditional media releases and news conferences. Curfew Activation. Dakota County has the authority to impose curfews to protect public safety. Cyber-Attack Hazard Description Cyber-attacks are malicious activities employed by individuals or organizations that target computer information systems, infrastructure, computer networks, and/or personal computer devices to steal, alter, or destroy data by unauthorized access(hacking) into a susceptible system. As recent headlines attest, no company, organization or government agency is immune to targeted attacks. Data reported by Risk Based Security' revealed close to 4,000 publicly reported data breaches in 2020, a total actually lower than in 2019, although the number of records exposed exceeded 37 billion, the most documented to-date. Since the 2016 Plan update, an increase in ransomware attacks and growing sophistication of the types and methods of attacks has raised risk levels to the highest known. Victims have included consumers, government, businesses, healthcare (the most victimized sector in 2020), and even data security/technology firms. Cyber-security stakes were raised in 2020 amid the COVID-19 pandemic, as many workplaces shifted employees to remote work situations and faced enormous challenges in keeping digital work environments secure. Table 4.19 Recent Cyber Attacks,2019-2021 Recent Cyber Attacks #Records Exposed T-Mobile,2021 40,000,000 Blackbaud (and clients),2020, ransomware 3,000,000 Star Tribune, 2020 2,192,857 Netsential (251 client law enforcement agencies), 2020 700,000 Allina and Children's Minnesota Health,2020, ransomware 200,000 Quest Diagnostics/Optum360, 2019 11,500,000 SolarWinds(18,000 clients), 2019 unknown Being prepared requires using a multi-layer strategy in which early detection, attack containment and recovery measures are considered together. 1 Risk Based Security: 2020 Year End Data Breach QuickView Report Page 83 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Geographic Location The risk of cyber-attack exists County-wide for government agencies, institutions, businesses, and individuals. Previous Occurrence Numerous attempts to access County data occur on a daily basis, although successful attempts are rare. Vulnerability The following table summarizes the overall vulnerability to cyber-attack. IFrequency of Occurrence: Highly likely I Warning Time: None-Minimal I I Geographic Extent: County-wide or greater I I Likely Adverse Impact: Critical I Plans or Programs for Cyber Attack Securing cyber systems requires a layered defense that accounts for the range of security challenges facing organizations, including logical and physical threats to cyber-based systems. Network Monitoring. Dakota County uses a variety of tools to monitor county networks for cyber threats. The tools are evaluated and modified to address different methods of attack. Mobile Device Management. Dakota County requires authentication to unlock a device, locking out a device after a predetermined number of failed attempts, using encrypted data communications/storage and remote wiping of devices if it becomes lost or stolen. Staff Training. A series of quarterly online courses have been deployed to all staff to increase the awareness of cyber security threats and steps they should take to protect data and devices. Cyber Security Policies. Dakota County has implemented several policies that support cyber security and data protection. These include Policy 1013 Data Practices; 3500 HIPAA; 6001 Acceptable Use of Technology Resources, 6003 Email Management, 6004 Information Security, 6005 Records Retention and Disposition; 6007 Mobile Devices, 6010 Cloud Computing, 6011 Information Security Incident Response. Staff and Community Awareness. A Cyber Security Month Campaign for public and staff awareness is completed on an annual basis. Continuity of Operations Planning. The Dakota County COOP plan includes protocols on the recovery of information technology systems and is updated and exercised on a regular basis. Organizational Restructuring to Focus on Cyber Security: IT security is a separate function with dedicated staff positions to work on cyber-attack prevention and response. Annual Network Audit and Penetration Testing: annual audits and testing are conducted to identify potential weaknesses and strengthen system security. New Software Tools and Analytics: strengthen security of systems. Examples include: • Multifactor authentication • Increased stringency of password requirements • Removal of local administration rights Page 84 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Dam Failure Hazard Description Dams are storage or diversion barriers that impound water in reservoirs. Dam failure is a collapse, breach or overtopping of the structure. Most dams have storage volumes small enough that failures have relatively minor repercussions, although dams with large storage volumes can cause significant flooding downstream. Dam failure can result in injuries, loss of life, and damage to property and environment. While levees are built solely for flood protection, dams often serve multiple purposes such as hydroelectric generation,flood control, and recreation. Dams are usually engineered to withstand a flood with a calculated risk of occurrence. Severe flooding can increase the potential of dam failure as a result of the physical force of the flood waters or overtopping. Failed dams can create floods that are catastrophic to life and property, in part because of the tremendous energy of the released water. Hazard potential for dam failure is classified according to the following definitions accepted by the Interagency Team on Dam Safety: • Low Hazard Potential—Failure or mis-operation results in no probable loss of human life and low economic and/or environmental losses. Losses are principally limited to the owner's property. • Significant Hazard Potential—Failure or mis-operation results in no probable loss of human life but can cause economic loss, environmental damage, disruption of lifeline facilities, or other impacts. Significant hazard potential dams are often located in mostly rural or agricultural areas but could be located in areas with population and significant infrastructure. • High Hazard Potential—Failure or mis-operation will likely cause loss of human life. Dam failure can be caused by simple structural failure, or any combination of the following factors: • flood conditions leading to overtopping • internal erosion • inadequate spillway capacity • improper operation or maintenance • sabotage • failure of upstream dams Warning time for dam failure varies widely and depends on the causal factors. Dam failure can occur in as little as a few minutes or slowly over the course of months. Catastrophic failure of a large dam would result in short evacuation times for locations directly downstream. Topography and floodplain characteristics determine warning time for locations further downstream. Geographic Location Several dams in the county are in the USACE National Inventory of Dams (NID),which documents dams meeting the following criteria: 1) High Hazard classification—loss of at least one human life is likely if the dam fails 2) Significant hazard classification—possible loss of life and likely significant property or environmental destruction 3) Height equals or exceeds 25 feet and storage exceeds 15 acre-feet 4) Storage equals or exceeds 50 acre-feet storage and height exceeds 6 feet Page 85 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Table 4.20 NID Dams in Dakota County Dam Name NID I.D. Primary Purpose NID Height NID Storage NID Hazard (Ft.) (Acre-Feet) Potential Blackdog Lake MN00349 Other 25 3,550 Low Blackdog Lake West MN01595 Other 20 1,000 Low Vermillion River MN00389 Hydroelectric 12 75 Low Lake Byllesby MN00514 Hydroelectric 75 24,000 High Lake Byllesby Perimeter MN00514 Hydroelectric 9 24,000 High Embankment Lake Byllesby MN00514 Hydroelectric 68 16,000 High Lock and Dam#2 MN00594 Navigation 42 787,000 Significant Kaposia Park MN00675 Other 79 180 Significant Sunset Lake MN01012 Flood Control 21 200 High Butler Pond MN01588 Fish and Wildlife Pond 11 165 Low Source:National Inventory of Dams,2021 The two high hazard potential dams in Dakota County are the Lake Byllesby hydroelectric dam system (FERC-regulated) in Randolph Township and the Sunset Lake Dam in Burnsville. Probable maximum flood event studies and dam breach scenarios are required for High Hazard Dams. Potential failure mode analyses and inundation maps for high hazard dams are accompanied by Emergency Action Plans, periodic exercises, and annual safety inspections. In addition to the NID dams listed above, several flood control levees along major rivers are located in Dakota County. Levees along the Minnesota River and dikes around a Burnsville quarry and floodplain industries (upstream of Interstate 35-W) provide limited flood protection. Flood-proofing measures also protect Northern States Power's Black Dog plant, downstream of Interstate 35-W. Levees along the Mississippi River in South St. Paul and Inver Grove Heights Flood provide flood protection. In 1969, a 4,100-foot levee averaging 14 feet in height was built to protect a low-lying residential and business area along the Mississippi River. The upstream end of the levee connects with the flood barrier provided for South St. Paul. In 1968,the United States Army Corp of Engineers completed 2.5 miles of permanent flood barrier along the Mississippi River to protect the packing plants and the South St. Paul sewage plant. The barrier has closures that require local action to maintain the 1-percent annual chance flood frequency protection. The project has two pumping stations with about 7,300 feet of interceptor and storm sewers to provide interior drainage. Following the April 1965 flood in the Vermillion River,the city of Hastings constructed a levee along the left bank of the Vermillion River upstream of the County Highway 47 bridge to prevent direct overbank flow. While the levee effectively prevents overbank flow,the reach is influenced by downstream floodwaters. Because of this, the levee does not provide 1-percent annual chance flood protection. The County Highway 47 bridge was rebuilt in 1958 to pass greater flood flows on the Vermillion River. Previous Occurrences There are no prior incidents of partial or full dam failure of dams or levee breach in Dakota County. Vulnerability The following table summarizes the overall vulnerability to dam failure: Frequency of Occurrence: Unlikely Warning Time: 6-12 hours Geographic Extent: County-wide or greater Likely Adverse Impact: Critical Page 86 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Sunset Lake Dam, Burnsville The City of Burnsville maintains the dam and prepares/updates the Emergency Action Plan (EAP). City studies have considered a range of emergency scenarios including a 100-year storm event with and without structural failure of the dam and has identified residential and park properties at risk of flooding. Byllesby Dam, Randolph Township Dakota County maintains the Byllesby Dam and updates and exercises the EAP. The potential inundation area with a dam failure is approximately 7,000 acres and is predominantly located in Goodhue County. Much of the inundation area is open space—floodplain, natural areas, and farmland. The area of urban development is mostly in the City of Cannon Falls. Emergency evacuation maps and information about the flood warning system for Cannon Falls are online at: Lake Byllesby Dam & Reservoir I Dakota County. Plans and Programs for Dam or Levee Failure Dams and levees in Dakota County are maintained according to federal specifications. Dakota County Water Resources maintains the Byllesby Dam according to Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) requirements.The City of Hastings maintains a hydroelectric plant at Lock and Dam #2, while the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers has responsibility for the adjacent lock and dam. The cities of South St. Paul and Inver Grove Heights maintain and monitor their levees.The City of Burnsville owns and maintains the Sunset Lake Dam. Lake Byllesby Dam. As a FERC-regulated hydropower facility,the dam undergoes rigorous inspection for structural stability and integrity. Required actions include development of an Emergency Action Plan (EAP), periodically tested through exercises. The downstream community of Cannon Falls has participated in development of warning systems and system tests. i �, s�. p r - .. • a Figure 4.16 High Water at the Lake Byllesby Dam,2010 Dakota County Water Resources Byllesby Dam Security&Structural Enhancement. Dakota County Water Resources has enhanced the security of the Byllesby Dam and the hydropower facility. In 2008,the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) required Dakota County to increase spill capacity over the dam,which was completed by adding a new$7.5 million crest gate spillway in 2014. In 2015, Dakota County allocated $3.5 million toward major structural repair and rehabilitation,gate inspection and refurbishment, and Page 87 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 facility-related enhancements to the dam structure. Dakota County is currently replacing the existing 100+year old turbines and powerhouse with new, more efficient equipment to continue power production, which assists in offsetting costs associated with dam operations. The $30 million turbine replacement project is scheduled to be completed in 2022. With the upgrades and a projected output of 4 MW,the Byllesby Dam is ineligible for High Hazard Potential Dam grants through FEMA. Sunset Lake Dam.The City of Burnsville prepares and updates an Emergency Action Plan for the Sunset Lake Dam, as reflected in the city strategies in Section VII. City staff report that they do not intend to pursue HHPD grant funds for the dam. Hazardous Material Incident Hazard Description FEMA provides the following description for hazardous materials: "Chemicals are found everywhere. They purify drinking water, are used in agriculture and industrial production,fuel our vehicles and machines, and simplify household chores. But chemicals also can be hazardous to humans or the environment if used or released improperly. Hazards can occur during production, storage,transportation, use, or disposal. The community is at risk if a chemical is used unsafely or released in harmful amounts." Hazardous materials in various forms can cause fatalities, serious injury, long-lasting health effects, and damage to buildings, homes, and other property. Many products containing hazardous chemicals are routinely used and stored in homes, businesses, health care facilities, and institutions. These products are also shipped daily on the nation's highways, railroads, waterways, and pipelines. Varying quantities of hazardous materials are manufactured, used, or stored at an estimated 4.5 million facilities in the United States--from major industrial plants to local dry-cleaning establishments or gardening supply stores. Hazardous materials include explosives,flammable and combustible substances, poisons, and radioactive materials. Hazardous material incidents are technological (non-natural) events that involve large-scale releases of chemical, biological or radiological materials. Hazardous materials incidents involve releases at fixed-site facilities that manufacture, store, process or handle hazardous materials or along transportation routes such as major highways, railways, navigable waterways and pipelines. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency requires industry to report information on toxic chemical releases through the Toxics Release Inventory(TRI) Program. In the previous decade,TRI reporting requirements were reduced; thereby limiting available data on chemical releases and disposal. In 2009, the federal government reinstated stricter reporting requirements for industrial and federal facilities that release toxic substances with potential to threaten human health and the environment. Geographic Location Roads, rails, aircraft, and pipelines all convey hazardous materials,with each presenting differing levels of risk from the release of hazardous materials. The road system in Dakota County provides a network to transport hazardous and non-hazardous material throughout the region and between local communities. Risk of hazardous material exposure varies, based on the classification of the road and its proximity to people and property. Public safety consequences would be most severe in the more populated urban portions of the county and along state highways. According to the most recent findings at the Minnesota Department of Transportation, more than half of all accidents involving hazardous materials have occurred on state roadways. Due to the lack of available information on materials traveling on the system daily, roads are a major concern in Dakota County. Page 88 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Rail transportation also poses risks. Valve leakage and safety valve releases can be spill sources on pressurized and general service tank cars, covered hoppers, and inter-modal trailers/containers. Leaks can manifest themselves as odors or vaporous clouds from tanker top valves, spraying or splashing from tanker top valves, wetness on the side of a car, or drainage from the bottom outlet valve. Depending on the type of rail car involved, a leak could result in hundreds to thousands of gallons/pounds of a substance being released. Dakota County's pipelines carry natural gas, crude oils, and gasoline, and jet fuels to local and remote users through several routes. Release from any of these lines could create significant hazards. A variety of hazardous materials exist in fixed facilities throughout Dakota County. They range from flammable liquids to radioactive materials to biological agents. Facilities storing or using hazardous materials above minimal amounts must develop and file a risk management plan with the State Emergency Response Commission and the Environmental Protection Agency. Facility plans identify significant hazards, likely release scenarios,the estimated population affected by a release, and specific steps to protect that population in the event of a release. The Prairie Island nuclear power facility in Goodhue County (roughly 20 miles southeast of the Dakota County seat of Hastings) also maintains a Nuclear Emergency Plan with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission,that plan lays out contingency actions in the event of a radioactive release. Compared to most states, Minnesota ranks lower in the number of hazardous materials processing and handling facilities-- 34th in the nation for pounds of on and off-site releases from industrial and federal facilities (22,435,175 pounds) and 28th in the nation for total number of pounds of production-related waste managed (275,684,419 pounds). The most concentrated and potentially hazardous materials are at fixed industrial facilities including oil and gas processing and storage facilities, pipelines, industrial complexes that use or process chemicals or petroleum products, highways, and railroads. Other sources include storage areas for insecticides, herbicides, and fertilizers, wrecking yards, retail fueling stations, and abandoned industrial facilities. Dakota County businesses or facilities housing hazardous materials are on file. For security considerations, this plan does not include detailed locations for hazardous materials handling and transport facilities. The EPA's Toxic Release Inventory database lists 23 fixed-site facilities in Dakota County, although the TRI should not be considered an exhaustive list but rather a subset of facilities that fall in a specific classification. 502 fixed-site facilities filed reports with the TRI statewide. The following table provides toxic release data by TRI categories for Dakota County in 2019. Table 4.21 Toxic Release Inventory Category,Dakota County,2019 Release Category Pounds Released Total On-Site and Off-Site Disposal or Other Releases 943,300 Fugitive Air Emissions 70,615 Point Source Air Emissions 502,446 Release to Surface Waters 302,395 Source:TRI Explorer,U.S.EPA. Release year 2019 National Analysis data set made available March 2021. Previous Occurrences The Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) maintains the Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS), a national database of oil and hazardous substance releases. ERNS is a cooperative effort among EPA Headquarters,the Department of Transportation,the National Transportation Systems Center,the ten EPA Regions, the U.S. Coast Guard, and the National Response Center. ERNS provides the most comprehensive data on release notifications of hazardous substances in the U.S. Page 89 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Table 4.22 Annual ERNS Incidents Reported,State of Minnesota 2000-2019 Year Incidents Fatalities Hospitalizations Injuries Evacuations Property Damage 2000 284 6 18 19 2,138 $1,584,400 2001 278 17 11 12 515 $1,806,500 2002 247 15 11 13 127 $1,121,266 2003 205 18 10 14 388 $737,400 2004 232 19 16 20 236 $356,001 2005 194 14 34 34 349 $2,643,041 2006 228 20 12 18 161 $250,000 2007 223 20 12 14 84 $1,347,800 2008 220 16 31 33 294 $500,500 2009 228 15 39 40 397 $932,000 2010 221 8 66 68 1,766 $430,000 2011 217 14 14 19 192 $764,000 2012 209 22 19 31 265 $668,000 2013 243 14 17 19 452 $811,000 2014 185 15 32 32 191 $1,255,000 2015-2019 451 0 - 26 96 $165,600 TOTALS 3,865 233 342 412 7,651 $15,372,508 Average 193 12 17 _ 21 383 $768,625.40 Source:https://rtk.riifuture.org/rmp/states/ Table 4.22 shows 3,865 hazmat incidents in Minnesota from 2000 through 2019. Data was available in an aggregated format after 2015. Incidents resulted in 12 deaths, 17 hospitalizations, 21 injuries and 383 people evacuated annually(averaged). Property damage averaged nearly$1 million annually. The U.S. Coast Guard maintains comprehensive data available through the National Response Center (NRC),the national point of contact for reporting all oil, chemical, radiological, and biological discharges into the environment in the United States and its territories. According to the NRC, 133 hazardous materials spills were reported in Dakota County from 2016 through 2020. Vulnerability The following table summarizes the overall vulnerability to hazardous material incidents: Frequency of Occurrence: Highly Likely Warning Time: None-Minimal Geographic Extent: Localized Likely Adverse Impact: Limited to Critical Plans and Programs for Hazardous Material Incidents State agency cooperation. Dakota County works with the MPCA and Minnesota Department of Health to address response and mitigation needs for hazmat events. MPCA maintains a 24-7 on-call Emergency Response Team to provide containment and cleanup expertise to local first responders. Emergency Operations Plan. The Dakota County Emergency Operations Plan outlines procedures for dealing with hazardous material accidents, spills or releases. Hazardous chemicals data collection. Dakota County's Emergency Preparedness Coordinator works with the Department of Public Safety's Emergency Response Commission to collect data on hazardous chemicals stored in the county so that local emergency officials can prepare for incidents. Nuclear Emergency Plan. The Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant works with the County to annually review and update the Nuclear Emergency Plan, evaluate evacuation procedures, address land use issues for nearby property and update mutual aid agreements with communities. Page 90 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Groundwater Program. Most County residents rely on groundwater for their drinking water,from a public supplier or a domestic well. Hazmat incidents put drinking water wells at contamination risk, and unused, unsealed wells can allow surface contamination to reach aquifers. Dakota County's Delegated Well Program collects well data for the Minnesota Well Index and County well database. In a spill,this data can help responders protect drinking water. Dakota County's Groundwater Protection Program recognizes that the county's ground water is impacted by agricultural fertilizer and pesticide applications and provides for testing to residents with private water wells. Environmental health regulations. Dakota County has worked to develop environmental health regulations through its Environmental Resources and Public Health Departments. Dakota County Office of GIS. Coordinates a county-wide GIS Users Group and participates in regional preparedness planning initiatives. Training of emergency personnel. All county and local emergency response personnel are trained to, at a minimum,the Hazardous Materials Awareness level. All first responder groups conduct the required Occupational Health and Safety Administration training on a yearly basis. Wakota CAER. Wakota CAER is a coalition of • industry and public agencies that provides _ Y planning, training, and education for natural disasters,fires and explosions, chemical release 4111111,137 emergencies, and mitigation of other major '- r hazards. Wakota CAER serves communities in Washington and Dakota counties. __. ." - - Hazardous Waste Ordinance (County '� Ordinance No. 111)establishes rules, --; -:-!f reg ulations, and standards for hazardous waste t_ • - = •■+ management on identification, labeling, Figure 4.17 Anhydrous Ammonia Leak 2010, classification, handling, collection, Randolph transportation, storage,treatment, processing and/or disposal of hazardous waste. Structural Fire Hazard Description Structural fires regularly pose danger to life and destruction to property. They include any instance of uncontrolled burning which results in structural damage to residential, commercial, industrial, institutional or other properties. Fires can occur in any community and pose a year-round threat. Previous Occurrences Statewide in 2019, cooking accidents caused the largest percentage of structure fires (49 percent), with careless burning and appliances as the second and third leading causes. Together they accounted for 64.1 percent of all structural fires. Residences are particularly vulnerable as they represent 75 percent of all structural fires and account for 90 percent of all structural fire deaths. Commercial and industrial structures are also vulnerable. Table 4.23 lists recent fire statistics for the County. Page 91 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Table 4.23 Recent Fire Data for Dakota County Year Fire Runs Damage($M) Deaths Avg. Loss/Fire 2019 761 $15.3 2 $23,916 2018 690 $13.4 4 $22,736 2017 724 $7.8 3 $12,081 2016 750 $10.3 1 $15,633 2015 766 $14.4 4 $21,505 2014 759 $9.7 3 $13,009 2013 759 $10.2 1 $14,945 2012 974 $14.8 0 $16,875 2011 826 $8.7 0 $11,506 2010 794 $16.8 0 $22,680 2009 918 $9.8 2 $11,052 2008 827 $16.3 0 $21,816 2007 958 $9.7 1 $12,163 2006 944 $12.3 3 $14,366 2005 912 $8.7 0 $10,485 *As reported to the Minnesota State Fire Marshal(Rosemount not reporting 2005) Vulnerability The following table summarizes the overall vulnerability to Structural Fire. IFrequency of Occurrence: Highly Likely I Warning Time: None-Minimal Geographic Extent: Localized Likely Adverse Impact: Critical Plans and Programs for Structural Fire Fire departments. Primary responders for structural fires in their district boundaries. Work with other departments on larger fires. Fire educational services. Provide State training. Firefighters participate in education to county residents, including: mandatory firefighting training classes offered • Business inspections by the state. • Woodstove inspections • Fire safety education at schools, churches, civic groups and county fair ii ;, 'r N { • CPR training ' '''' ': e :# e■ Coordination of education with other r � "; � i`�' � a .� r agencies, hospitals and schools ` . -(4, ' • Education on business fire prevention - -' _ a_ • Chimney inspections • Youth education at schools • Fire prevention week Zoning. City zoning departments,which "' '�:' include building inspectors, regulate new housing and enforce safety restrictions . including setbacks, lot coverage, building Figure 4.18 Propane Explosion and Fire,West St. materials and fire suppression systems. City Paul, 1974 fire marshals inspect commercial structures Dakota County Historical Society for fire hazards routinely. Page 92 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Terrorism Hazard Description The FBI breaks terrorism into two categories: International Terrorism and Domestic Terrorism. International terrorism is defined as violent, criminal acts committed by individuals and/or groups who are inspired by, or associated with, designated foreign terrorist organizations or nations (state- sponsored). Domestic terrorism is defined as violent, criminal acts committed by individuals and/or groups to further ideological goals stemming from domestic influences, such as those of a political, religious, social, racial, or environmental nature. Threat assessment, mitigation, and response to terrorism are federal and state directives, and agencies work primarily with local law enforcement. The Office of Infrastructure Protection within the federal Department of Homeland Security leads the coordinated national program to reduce and mitigate risk within 18 national critical infrastructure and key resources (CIKR) sectors from acts of terrorism and natural disasters and to strengthen sectors' ability to quickly respond and recover from an attack or emergency. This is done through the National Infrastructure Protection Plan (NIPP). Under the NIPP, a Sector-Specific federal agency is assigned to lead a collaborative process for infrastructure protection for each of the 18 sectors. The Office of Infrastructure Protection provides coordination and collaboration needed to set national priorities, and goals.The NIPP framework integrates a broad range of public and private CIKR protection activities. Sector-Specific Agencies provide guidance about the NIPP framework to state,tribal,territorial and local homeland security agencies and personnel. They coordinate NIPP implementation within the sector, which involves developing and sustaining partnerships and information-sharing processes, as well as assisting with contingency planning and incident management. The Office of Infrastructure Protection has Sector-Specific Agency responsibility for six CIKR sectors: • Chemical • Commercial Facilities • Critical Manufacturing • Dams • Emergency Services • Nuclear Reactors, Materials and Waste Sector-Specific Agency responsibility for the other 12 CIKR sectors is held by other Department of Homeland Security components and other federal agencies: • Agriculture and Food—Department of Agriculture; Food and Drug Administration • Banking and Finance—Department of the Treasury • Communications—Department of Homeland Security • Defense Industrial Base—Department of Defense • Energy—Department of Energy • Government Facilities—Department of Homeland Security • Information Technology—Department of Homeland Security • National Monuments and Icons—Department of the Interior • Postal and Shipping—Transportation Security Administration • Healthcare and Public Health—Department of Health and Human Services • Transportation Systems—Transportation Security Administration; U.S. Coast Guard • Water— Environmental Protection Agency Page 93 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 The NIPP requires that each Sector-Specific Agency prepare a Sector-Specific Plan, review it annually, and update it as appropriate. According to the Department of Homeland Security, it leverages resources within federal, state and local governments, coordinating the transition of multiple agencies and programs into a single, integrated agency focused on protecting the public. Geographic Location Probable high risk-targets for acts of terrorism include military and civilian facilities, international airports, large cities, and high-profile landmarks. Terrorists might also target large public gatherings and events,water and food supplies, utilities, and corporate centers.The table below highlights terrorist incidents in the last 10 years in the United States with mass casualties, defined as 3 or more fatalities and/or wounded victims. Table 4.24 Recent Terrorist Incidents in the United States(2010-2019) Date Incident City,State Fatalities Wounded 8/5/12 Sikh Temple shooting Oak Creek,WI 5 3 4/15/13 Boston Marathon bombing Boston, MA 3 180 4/13/14 Jewish Community Center shooting Overland Park, KS 3 0 6/17/15 Emanuel African Methodist Church mass shooting Charleston,SC 9 1 7/16/15 Military installation shooting Chattanooga,TN 5 2 11/27/15 Planned Parenthood shooting Colorado Springs, CO 3 9 12/2/15 Inland Regional Center mass shooting San Bernardino,CA 14 22 6/12/16 Pulse Nightclub mass shooting Orlando, FL 49 53 9/24/17 Burnette Chapel Church of Christ shooting Antioch,TN 1 7 11/5/17 First Baptist Church shooting Sutherland Springs,TX 26 20 6/29/18 Capital Gazette shooting Annapolis, MD 5 2 9/19/18 Masontown Borough Municipal Center shooting Masontown, PA 0 4 10/27/18 Tree of Life Synagogue shooting Pittsburgh, PA 11 6 4/27/19 Chabad of Poway Synagogue shooting Poway, CA 1 3 5/31/19 Virginia Beach Municipal Center shooting Virginia Beach,VA 12 4 8/3/19 Walmart shooting El Paso,TX 23 22 12/29/19 West Freeway Church of Christ shooting White Settlement,TX 2 2 Totals 172 340 Source:https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/terrorism Previous Occurrence There are no prior incidents of terrorism in Dakota County. Vulnerability The following table summarizes the overall vulnerability to Terrorism. Frequency of Occurrence: Occasional Warning Time: None-Minimal Geographic Extent: Community-wide Likely Adverse Impact: Critical Plans and Programs for Terrorism Cooperation with city,county,state,and federal officials. Dakota County officials work with city, county, state, and federal officials on domestic preparedness efforts, such as the Minnesota Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, and the Department of Health. The details of these efforts go beyond the scope of this plan. Page 94 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Wastewater Treatment System Failure Hazard Description Wastewater Treatment System Failure is the failure or intentional release of part or all of wastewater treatment system that releases septic effluent into surface waters. All wastewater treatment plants are monitored regularly to meet National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit requirements. Biological and chemical contaminants in effluent discharged to local rivers are routinely evaluated. Chemical characteristics of groundwater in the vicinity of Metropolitan Council wastewater treatment plants are measured through a network of monitoring wells. Facilities are in noncompliance if they have had effluent violations, compliance schedule violations, permit schedule violations, single event violations (for example,violations found during inspections), or reporting violations (such as failure to report) during the fiscal year. Geographic Location Met Council Facilities. For most of the County,wastewater treatment is the responsibility of the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services Division (MCES.) Dakota County is served by four MCES Wastewater Treatment Plants (WWTP): Metro in Saint Paul (Ramsey County), Seneca in Eagan, Hastings, and Empire on the Vermillion River. The Council also manages a complex collector system. For more on these facilities, please see the Community Profile Section of this plan. Municipal Treatment Facilities. The cities of Vermillion and Hampton own and manage wastewater treatment facilities, each serving small urban areas with limited capacity plants. As these cities evaluate growth options, the future capacity and maintenance of their treatment facilities will be critical elements. Individual On-site Sewage Treatment Systems. The County is responsible for the inspection and enforcement of septic systems within shoreland and floodplain areas of the 13 unincorporated townships, Randolph Township, Waterford Township, and the cities of New Trier and Randolph. The City of Randolph is planning to construct a municipal wastewater treatment facility. The project is currently under design, with construction scheduled to begin in the fall of 2021 and finish in 2023. Systems are regulated in accordance with the standards for construction, design, maintenance, and inspection identified in Dakota County Ordinance No. 113. Cities and townships that have enacted a local septic system ordinance are responsible for the enforcement of septic system compliance within their own jurisdiction. Previous Occurrences There are no known incidents of wastewater treatment plant failures in Dakota County. Vulnerability The following table summarizes the overall vulnerability to wastewater treatment plant failure. I Frequency of Occurrence: Occasional I Warning Time: 6-12 hours I I Geographic Extent: Community-wide I I Likely Adverse Impact: Limited I Plans and Programs for Wastewater Treatment Plant Failure Emergency Preparedness and Response. Metropolitan Wastewater Treatment Plant management and staff have long understood the need for planned and prepared responses to the possibility of an emergency at a facility. Although the majority of responses are channeled into preventative measures and actions, emergency preparedness has received additional attention recently. Page 95 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Metropolitan Wastewater Treatment Plant management has developed comprehensive procedures and notification strategies pertaining to: • Emergency Response Notification Procedures • Media Relations • Evacuation and Muster Procedures • Management Response Documentation • Computerized Material Safety Data Sheet Access • Metro Plant Alarm Systems • Chlorine Release and/or Alarm • Sulfur Dioxide Release and/or Alarm • Severe Weather Procedures • Emergencies in Tunnels • Metropolitan Council—Business Closing, Weather • Shutdown Procedures • Civil Emergencies Hazardous Material or Chemical Spill Procedures. Met Council Environmental Services has reporting procedures for hazardous material or chemical spills. Industrial Waste Spill Procedures. Met Council Environmental Services has reporting procedures for industrial waste spills into the treatment facility. State Duty Officer Contact. The State Duty Officer is contacted in the event of spills or releases. Wastewater or Sludge Spill Procedures. Met Council Environmental Services has reporting procedures for wastewater or sludge spills. Water Supply Contamination Hazard Description Water supply contamination is the introduction of point and non-point source pollutants (microbiological and/or chemical) into public ground water and/or surface water supplies. Chemicals can leach through soils from leaking underground storage tanks,feedlots and waste disposal sites. Human wastes and pesticides can also be carried to lakes and streams during heavy rains or snow melt. The Clean Water Act establishes the structure for regulating pollutant discharges into U.S. waters and regulating surface water quality standards. Under the Clean Water Act,the EPA implemented the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit program to control pollutant discharges. The EPA also is charged with protecting drinking water quality, in accordance with the Safe Water Drinking Act. The law focuses on water actually or potentially designated for drinking use, whether from surface or underground sources. The Act authorizes the EPA to set minimum standards to protect public water supplies and requires all public water systems to comply with the health-related standards. Geographic Location Dakota County has 13 public water supply systems operated by individual municipalities and regulated by the Minnesota Department of Health. These systems predominantly rely on groundwater. St. Paul Regional Water Services provides water(treated Mississippi River water occasionally supplemented with well water)to Lilydale, Mendota, Mendota Heights, and West St. Paul. The unincorporated areas of the county are primarily served by private well systems. Page 96 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Monitoring is the critical element of compliance activities under the Safe Drinking Water Act(SDWA) of 1974. Under provisions of the act, public water supply systems are required to sample treated—or "finished"—water on a regular basis and submit the samples to the Minnesota Department of Health laboratory for analysis. Samples are tested for a broad range of potential contaminants. If unacceptable levels of contaminants are found, the water supply owner or operator is legally responsible for informing the people who use the water and for taking steps to eliminate potential health hazards. Minnesota's community water supply systems are monitored for more than 100 contaminants, including pesticides, industrial contaminants, bacteria, nitrates, inorganic chemicals, radioactive elements, disinfection by-products, lead, and copper. In Dakota County, approximately 8,000 homes, housing an estimated 22,000 residents, obtain their drinking water from private wells. Private wells, unlike public drinking water systems, are not federally regulated and therefore are not required to undergo routine monitoring to ensure that water contaminants are present at concentrations below levels of health concerns. Previous Occurrences Community Public Water Suppliers Since 2016, only one municipal system in Dakota County has allowable maximum contaminant levels: • City of Hastings (pop. 22,637): E. coli bacterial contamination, 2018 Although nitrate has not exceeded maximum contaminant levels, the cities of Hastings and Rosemount have elevated nitrate levels in their water supply. The City of Hastings currently has one water treatment plant to reduce nitrate in water from two of the wells. Private Wells The Ambient Groundwater Quality Study (study) sampled 77 private drinking water wells over a 20-year period (1999-2019)to characterize groundwater quality and to monitor long-term trends in groundwater contamination. The study found both natural and manmade chemicals at levels of concern. Of the 77 wells sampled over the course of the study, 62 percent contained concentrations of at least one chemical contaminant exceeding current Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) drinking water guidelines. Below is a summary of the percentage of wells with contaminants exceeding established drinking water guidelines. Table 4.25 Water Quality Exceedances from the Ambient Groundwater Quality Study Chemical Percent of Wells Exceeding Drinking Water Guideline at Least Once between 1999-2019 Manganese 34 percent of wells sampled exceed the guideline of 0.100 mg/L(parts per million) Nitrate 31 percent exceed the guideline of 10 mg/L Cyanazine-herbicide breakdown products 22 percent exceed the guideline of 1 µg/L(micrograms per liter or parts per billion) Gross Alpha 3 percent exceed the guideline of 15 pCi/L(picocuries per liter) Vulnerability The following table summarizes the overall vulnerability to water supply contamination. Frequency of Occurrence: Likely Warning Time: None-Minimal I Geographic Extent: Community-wide I Likely Adverse Impact: Limited I Page 97 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Plans and Programs for Water Supply Contamination Drinking water standards, requirements. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) sets uniform nationwide minimum standards for drinking water. The Minnesota Department of Health has the primary responsibility for ensuring that each public water source meets these federal drinking water standards, and in some cases,the more stringent MN standards. Public water supply monitoring. The EPA requires an ongoing water quality-monitoring program to ensure public water systems are working properly. Local officials work with the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) and the EPA to ensure that all public water supplies are safe. The EPA requires all local suppliers to promptly inform the public if their supply becomes contaminated. Emergency Plans. For water systems serving more than 3,000 people,the EPA requires completion of an Emergency Response Plan in the event of contamination. Wellhead protection program. Dakota County, working with the MDH, assists municipal water suppliers in developing and implementing wellhead protection plans. Well construction and testing. Since 1974, public and private wells constructed in Minnesota must meet Minnesota Well Code location and construction requirements. Community supply wells are regulated by the MDH. Through a Delegation Agreement with the MDH, Dakota County has authority for regulating construction and sealing for all other water wells in the County in accordance with Mn. Statute 1031, Minnesota Rules Chapter 4725, and Dakota County Ordinance No. 114, "Well and Water Supply Management." In Dakota County, private drinking water wells must be tested for nitrate, arsenic, manganese, and coliform bacteria and must meet the standards for nitrate, arsenic, and coliform bacteria at the time of construction and at the time of property transfer, or installation of water treatment system is required. In addition,the County Environmental Resources Department provides education and outreach to private well owners, recommends and facilitates regular,voluntary testing of private wells, and provides homeowners with information on preventative maintenance measures.To ensure safe drinking water,the County encourages private well owners to test their well water for coliform bacteria every year; nitrate at least every other year; and arsenic, lead, and manganese at least once. Well sealing promotion,enforcement,and grants. Unused, unsealed wells can serve as conduits for surface contamination to flow to the underlying groundwater. By Minnesota Statute, unused wells must be sealed, brought back into use, or permitted with an annual maintenance permit and fee. The Dakota County Environmental Resources Department reviews well disclosure documents during property sales and continually researches other, potential unused, unsealed wells. When unsealed wells are located, County staff carry out enforcement measures as needed. The department promotes well sealing with cost-share grants to well owners, using federal Community Development Block Grant funding through the Dakota County Community Development Agency (CDA) and County levy funding. Dakota County Groundwater Plan.The 2020-2030 Dakota County Groundwater Plan provides the ten-year strategic plan for ensuring sufficient, high quality groundwater resources.The identified goals are (1) Water Quality: Groundwater and drinking water are free from unhealthy levels of contaminants; (2) Water Quantity: Groundwater is sufficient to meet human needs and sustain groundwater-dependent ecosystems; (3) Education: People who live and work in Dakota County are knowledgeable about water issues, conserve water, and prevent pollution; (4) Governance: Groundwater programs and services are efficient and effective. Page 98 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Septic System Program. County Ordinance 113, "Subsurface Sewage Treatment Systems", provides standards, guidelines, and regulations for the compliance and enforcement of the proper siting, design, construction, installation, operation, maintenance, repair, reconstruction, inspection, and permanent abandonment of individual sewage treatment systems. Cities and townships administer their own subsurface sewage treatment system program with the exception of those that are under County septic authority. All municipalities within the county must have standards at least as restrictive as Dakota County Ordinance 113. Page 99 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Page intentionally blank. Page 100 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 SECTION V — DAKOTA COUNTY VULNERABILITIES 44 CFR Requirement§201.6(c)(2)(ii): [The risk assessment shall include a] description of the jurisdiction's vulnerability to the hazards described in paragraph (c) (2) (i)of this section.This description shall include an overall summary of each hazard and its impact on the community. This section provides hazard rankings and vulnerabilities developed for Dakota County, MN, including unincorporated townships covered under this plan. Hazard Rankings Table 5.1 displays rankings updated in 2022 for each hazard profiled in Section IV, based on the likely frequency, warning time,geographic extent, and adverse impact. Cyber-attack received the highest ranking,followed by civil disturbance, structural fire, and tornado-violent summer storms. Table 5.1 Dakota County Ranking of Hazards Warning Geographic Likely Hazards Facing the County,2021 Frequency Adverse Total Time Extent Impact Cyber Attack 4 4 3 3 14 Structural Fire 4 4 1 3 12 Tornado 3 4 2 3 12 Violent Summer Storms 4 3 2 3 12 Hazardous Material Incidents 4 4 1 2.5 11.5 Flash Flood 4 4 1 2 11 Civil Disturbance 3 3 2 3 11 Terrorism 2 4 2 3 11 Water Supply Contamination 3 4 2 2 11 Pandemic 2.5 1 3 4 10.5 Infectious Disease Outbreak 3 1 3 3 10 Violent Winter Storms 4 1 2 3 10 Dam/Levee Failure 1 2 3 3 9 Drought 3 1 3 2 9 Landslide 2 4 1 2 9 Overland Flood 3 2 2 2 9 Extreme Temperatures 3 1 3 2 9 Wastewater Treatment Plant Failure 2 2 2 2 8 Wildfire 2 4 1 1 8 Hazard rankings used the following scoring system: Frequency of Occurrence:How often is this hazard expected to occur? 1=Unlikely <1 percent probabilitiy in the next 100 years 2=Occasional 1-10 percent probability in the next year, at least one in the next 100 years 3=Likely >10 percent but<100 percent probability in the next year, at least once in 10 years 4=Highly Likely 100 percent probable in the next year Warning Time: How much time will there likely be to alert people to hazard conditions? 1=More than 12 hours 2=6-12 hours 3=3-6 hours 4=None-minimal Geographic Extent: How large an area would likely be affected? 1=Localized Page 101 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 2=Community-wide 3=County-wide or greater extent Likely Adverse Impact: on people,critical facilities, housing, businesses,and environment 1=Negligible 2=Limited 3=Critical 4=Catastrophic FEMA NRI Natural Hazard Risk Ratings Compared to the rest of the US, Dakota County has relatively low risk ratings for most natural hazards, according to the Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA) National Risk Index(NRI). Released in 2021,the NRI is an online tool and data source for estimating a relative risk index for natural hazards based on expected annual loss,social vulnerability, and community resilience. Dakota County's overall scoring is shown in Table 5.2. • Annualized losses incorporate data for natural hazard exposure, annualized frequency, and historic loss ratios. Dakota County ranks relatively moderate in this score. • Social Vulnerability measures the susceptibility of social groups to adverse impacts of hazards, based on data/models from the University of South Carolina's Hazards and Vulnerability Research Institute (HVRI) Social Vulnerability Index(SoVI).2 The index uses 29 socioeconomic variables, such as age (very young or very old), income, household structure, housing, ethnicity and race, English proficiency, and others. Dakota County ranks very low in this score. • Community Resilience is the third index, also based on USC-HVRI work. It includes 49 indicators that measure resilience from the social, economic, community capitol, institutional capacity, housing/infrastructure, and environmental perspectives. Dakota County ranks very high in this score. Table 5.2 NRI Overall Ratings for Dakota County,MN Measure Dakota County Score Comparison to US Risk Index 10.5 Relatively Low Expected Annual Loss 26.79 Relatively Moderate Social Vulnerability 19.75 _ Very Low Community Resilience 58.21 Very High The NRI is included to supplement County information on hazards and vulnerabilities.Table 5.3 summarizes overall NRI scores for natural hazards in the County, compared to the rest of the United States. Strong wind is the only NRI hazard with a high score.The scoring is largely consistent with Table 5.1 which identifies severe summer storms as the natural hazards of greatest concern. 2 University of South Carolina's Hazards and Vulnerability Research Institute Social Vulnerability Index(SoVI)- https://a rtsandsciences.sc.edu/geog/hvri/sovi-data. Page 102 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Table 5.3 NRI Hazard Ratings and Scores for Dakota County,MN Hazard Index Rating Score Strong Wind _ 24.69 Relatively High Cold Wave 18.34 Relatively Moderate Tornado 17.65 Relatively Moderate Hail 16.52 Relatively Moderate Lightning 10.84 Relatively Low Winter Weather 10.54 Relatively Low Ice Storm 10.08 Relatively Low Landslide 8.02 Relatively Low Riverine Flooding 6.74 Relatively Low Drought 3.28 Very Low Wildfire 3.07 Very Low _ Earthquake 0.85 Very Low Community Perception of Hazard Risks An online survey asked people who live and work in Dakota County their degree of concern about potential hazards that could occur. More than 1,000 respondents participated in the survey in 2021. Figure 5.1 ranks citizen concerns related to potential hazards, using weighted scores:Very Concerned=3, Moderately Concerned=2, Not Concerned=1. For each hazard, small numbers of respondents selected "Not Sure/Don't Know" and those results are not included in the graph.The results of the full survey are provided in Appendix II. Figure 5.1 Public Levels of Concern for Specific Hazards 2021 All-Hazard Plan Online Survey: Hazard Concerns Inf.disease outbreak/Pandemic(2.2) Drought(2.1) Cyber attack(2.0) Severe winter storms(2.0) Severe summer storms(2.0) Tornadoes(1.9) Civil unrest(1.9) Water supply contamination(1.9) Extreme temperatures(1.8) Structural fire(1.8) Hazardous materials incidents(1.7) Terrorism(1.6) Wastewater plant failure(1.6) Wildfires(1.6) Flash floods(1.4) Overland flooding(1.3) ■� Dam/Levee failure(1.1) Landslides(1.1) 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 ■Very Concerned ■Moderately Concerned Not Concerned 2021 marked a major departure from past Dakota County surveys in terms of hazards of greatest concern, with pandemic and drought receiving the highest rankings. As the survey was administered, Page 103 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Dakota County was in the fourth wave of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, as was the entire nation, and Minnesota was experiencing its worst drought since the 1980s. Cyber-attack was not included in prior surveys but received the third highest ranking. Civil Unrest was also a new hazard in the survey and received a relatively high ranking, with events following the murder of George Floyd in recent memory of Twin Citians. In previous online surveys, people expressed the greatest concern about severe summer storms, tornadoes, and severe winter storms, which remained as strong concerns. It is important to note that this survey was not scientifically sampled and cannot be considered statistically representative of County residents. Vulnerability Risk describes the community's susceptibility to hazards based on assessments that consider likely frequency of occurrence, estimated amount of warning time, geographic extent likely to be affected, and severity of impact from a worst-case scenario. The locations of vulnerable populations, emergency response facilities, and critical infrastructure are also important factors in evaluating risk potential. Population Vulnerability Dakota County's population was 439,882 in the 2020 US Census, an increase of 10.4 percent since 2010, and 23.6 percent since the 2000.The last decade's growth rate is slightly slower than the 12%change in the decade between 2000 and 2010. Table 5.4 Population Growth in Dakota County County 2000 Census 2010 Census 2020 Census 2000-2020 2010-2020 Population Population Population Change Change Dakota 355,904 398,552 439,882 23.6% 10.4% Source:U.S.Census Bureau Vulnerable populations include people who may not be able to assist themselves during an emergency. Mitigation efforts that consider the needs and location of these populations are important. FEMA defines vulnerable populations as persons meeting one or more of these conditions: • under five (5)years of age • over 65 years of age • having a disability • living in poverty Table 5.5 summarizes data on vulnerable populations for Dakota County. Table 5.5 Vulnerable Populations,Dakota County Dakota County Dakota U.S. Dakota County-U.S. (percent) (percent) Difference(percent) Under Age 5 6.5% 6.1% +0.4% Age 65 and Over 13.6% 15.6% -2.0% Income Below Poverty Level (based on 418,832 with known status) 6.0% 13.4% -7.4% Having a Disability (based on 419,507 civilian, non-institutionalized) 8.9% 12.6% -3.7% Source:U.S.Census Bureau,American Community Survey 2014-2019 Five-Year Estimates Page 104 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Demographic Trends Three significant demographic trends in Dakota County provide context for considering population changes and likely growth in some vulnerable populations. 1. Slow Continued Growth: Dakota County experienced strong growth from 2000 to 2010 (1.2 percent annually, 12 percent over the decade). Since 2010, annual growth rates have been slower but steady, at about one percent. Figure 5.2 Population Growth in Dakota County over Time _ Dakota County Population 1970- 2020 600,000 515,780 500,000 439,882 477,600 398,552 400,000 1 355,904 300,000 275,227 194,279 200,000 139,808 100,000 ■ 0 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 Source:U.S.Census Bureau,Metropolitan Council 2.Aging of the Population: Since Dakota County's rapid suburbanization in the 1980s, children have outnumbered seniors. This trend may reverse, according to the Minnesota State Demographers Office: • The number of Minnesotans turning 65 in this decade (about 285,000) will be greater than the past four decades combined. • By 2020, Minnesota's age 65+ population is expected to eclipse the age 5-17 population for the first time in history. • The number of adults age 65+ is expected to double between 2010 and 2030, when 20+ percent of Minnesotans will be an older adult. Figure 5.3 Projected Age Shift in Dakota County LDakota County Population shift: seniors and children c 160 - 140 II12096 85 80 - 40 - 26 Children ages 5 to 19 —a—Seniors age 65+ 0 I I I I I I I I 2000 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 Sources:U.S.Census Bureau&Minnesota State Demographic Center 3. Economic recovery from the 2008 Recession has been steady,with uncertain COVID impacts. Dakota County's unemployment rates have dropped steadily from the Recession high level of 7.2 percent until the emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, as shown in Figure 5.4. Pandemic restrictions had a broad range of impacts on the economy, notably for the hospitality, entertainment, and personal Page 105 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 service industries. Healthcare also suffered losses due to deferment of elective procedures. While some businesses have rebounded as restrictions were lifted, successive waves related to COVID variants over the past 18 months have not allowed for full recovery. The long-term economic impacts of COVID may not be realized for several years. As shown in Figure 5.5, unemployment rates in Dakota County reached 10 percent by mid-2020, dropping to 3 percent over the following year. Figure 5.4 Economic Recovery and Unemployment Rates Unemployment rate in Dakota (Counties) Numbers are not seasonally adjusted 10% 7.2% 7.0% ssh Recession 6.196 4 9a5 5.2% 4.1% 4.596 3.4% 3.2% 2.9% 3.8% 3.396 la=1 2.5% 2008 2009 2010 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Data Source.MN DEED(LADS) Figure 5.5 Unemployment during the Sars-CoV-2 Pandemic 1 Unemployment Rates (Percent) During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic, Dakota County, Minnesota: 2020-2021 15 15 9.1 10 9 7.9 7.6 5.7 2.9 2.9 2.9 3 ' 4 3.8 4.3 4.6 4.4 4 3.8 3.5 4.2 3.2 3.2 5 J 0 otic\yi o\()� �001'�00)) o�oao�o�o9o�o�o�o�o�o�o�o�owo�o�o ,\tioo�o,\N. �o\titi ,,\oti�e��o�o�4)t.�yc)<' „\c)(0 o� e 61, ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti Recovery has been steady, although economic conditions have not improved for everyone. Figure 5.6 shows that Dakota County's poverty rate has hovered between 6 and 8 percent in the decade since the Recession,with a drop below 5 percent(comparable to pre-Recession figures) only in 2016. Figure 5.6 People Living in Poverty in Dakota County Household poverty in Dakota (Counties) Percent of households below poverty level 15.00% 10.00% 7.91% 728% Recession 7.05 ° 6.60% 6.98% 5.10% 6.69% 6.44% _ 5.62% 6.2746 4.89% 4.24% mai 2009 2010 2011 Z0�. 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 -,.. .. .--..r.3u Amerrce,Comm:.:..•.. ._, Although median household income level has gradually increased in recent years, Figure 5.7 shows that when adjusted for inflation, Dakota County households have less to spend now than before the Page 106 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Recession,which is true for much of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. Dakota County's median household income was$92,640 in 2007, and its inflation-adjusted median household income for 2019 was$88,864. Figure 5.7 Median Household Income Trendline in Dakota County (2019 Dol la rs) $120,000 $80,000 _ $40,000 $0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Source.American Community Survey ILVDAL The NRI Social Vulnerability Rating for Dakota " "i " A vTH Ail Country overall is very low, compared to the rest frtmutt . Dakota County SOC IaI VU NM ratrllity•Rating of the US. Vulnerability varies within the county Ve•N low T DMA GROVE ''. ReLorlKlyLb., (Figure 5.8), with parts of West St. Paul receiving a EADAN HEM NM 1 41 ReI,tiwly Mederne relatively high rating. Portions of Apple Valley, _ -- l r• 41 ReVt ely Huh RLR�� _ �. Burnsville, Eagan, Hastings, Inver Grove Heights, J�A Sunfish Lake, Rosemount, South St. Paul, and APP.CY J EMOUNT NiNIN WCIII tWP "S Nininger Township have relatively moderate vulnerability. 1 it EMPIRE TWP f YE IL ION I MAR SHAN TWP IRAVENNA LAKE VI La r ` tYVP VERMILLION I �P I FARMINGION XEKTIq CASTLE EUREKA SWP RO[N TWP HAMWCNTWP D[SVGEAS WO 11 RANDOIPH i TERFCR 1WP ) r GPMEX1MLE NO i So Tam i Figure 5.8 NRI Social Vulnerability Map by Census Tract for Dakota County, MN Potential Losses The NRI calculates expected losses from natural hazards based on consequences to buildings,population death and injuries, and agricultural losses. Table 5.6 reports loss ratings, scores, dollar estimates and sectors of greatest impact for the range of natural hazards reviewed for Dakota County, MN. Strong wind is expected to incur the greatest losses at nearly$15M per year,with the greatest impact on built structures. Several hazards have significant impacts on more than one sector, including tornado, Page 107 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 lightning, and landslide. Extreme temperatures (heat and cold), ice storms, and lightning are expected to incur the greater losses on populations, with nearly all impacts of extreme heat on people. Table 5.6 NRI Expected Annual Losses for Natural Hazards, Dakota County,MN Hazard Annual Loss Rating Annual Total Annual Sector of Greatest Loss Score Loss Impact,Percent Strong Wind Very High 93.51 $14,665,676 Buildings,79% Tornado Relatively High 38.76 $8,163,706 Buildings,63% Hail Relatively High 39.47 $4,121,745 Buildings,86% Heat Wave Relatively High 29.52 $1,805,750 Population,99% Riverine Flooding Relatively Moderate 14.81 $1,626,654 Buildings,73% Cold Wave Relatively High 42.05 $483,696 Population, 72% Lightning Relatively High 35.62 $382,824 Population, 67% Ice Storm Relatively Moderate 28.66 $258,471 Population,86% Winter Weather Relatively Moderate 28.82 $154,156 Buildings,95% Landslide Relatively Moderate 22.44 $98,166 Buildings,58% Drought Relatively Low 6.88 $79,932 Agriculture, 100% Wildfire Relatively Low 6.74 $48,543 Buildings,87% Earthquake Very Low 2.17 $19,556 Buildings,94% WEST MFNAC -I-PAL) �'JTHnuL NDOTFigure 5.9 shows the variability of •%M yEIG FiGC5 5rp Wf H Dakota County expected annual losses within the + Expected Annual Loss Rating,Natural Hazards county. Roughly half of the county's INVER GROVE very low ' ( EAGAN HE IGHis i, ��Nvely L aw land area falls within a moderate ir Rekatwe„Moderate expected loss category, with the other I �- RURN$VILLE J -+ half in the low expected loss category. f APFL: ROSEMOUNT No clear differentiation of expected VA! TWPHASTIwGS losses exists between rural and _I — I R,IrI_� i urbanized areas. I i , EMPIRE TWP VE+A.ION MARSHANTWP RAVENNA+! LAKEVILLE f1' VERMILLION -RYE, W TWP I ' FARMIMGTON —_; 1 IiAm'-1N NE WO RI ER � MtESf VILt, CASYLE I.II,NA TWP ROCKTWP I HAM PTON TM DOUGLASTWP ---- EW NDO LPH ' ATEA41 H SWP TWPRFOR R GREENVALE TWP L._ I SGIOTA Figure 5.9 NRI Expected Annual Loss Ratings Structural Inventory and Valuation 44 CFR Requirement§201.6(c)(2)(ii) (B): [The plan should describe vulnerability in terms of an] estimate of the potential dollar losses to vulnerable structures identified in paragraph (c) (2) (ii) (A) of this section and a description of the methodology used to prepare the estimate.... Page 108 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 The County's hazard mitigation approach estimates potential structural losses related to hazards for the County as a whole and for townships covered under the County Plan. Calculated potential loss projections are seen as the "likely worst-case scenario" for any hazard where physical damage is likely. Potential flood loss assessments are also provided, as the affected areas are limited. Comparable information for cities is provided in Section 6. Total Structures Countywide Table 5.7 lists the total number and value of all structures county-wide as of 2021, using data from the Dakota County's Offices of Assessor Services and Geographic Information Services. Structures are identified by the associated land use: residential, commercial, industrial, and agricultural. "Exempt" buildings are not subject to property taxes, such as government buildings, schools, and places of worship. "Utilities" include fixed sites with infrastructure for electricity, sewer, and water. "Other" includes structures that do not fall into preceding categories. The table also provides this information for individual townships, which are covered under the county plan. Information for participating cities is provided by city in Section VII. Table 5.7 Structure Value Inventory,Dakota County 2021 Community Total I Estimated Building Estimated Land Total Value Structures Value Value Dakota County(all) Agricultural 5,263 $282,963,700 $1,542,413,200 $1,825,376,900 Commercial 3,336 $2,767,145,704 $1,740,543,200 $4,507,688,900 Exempt 3,812 $2,483,327,796 $1,518,277,400 $4,001,605,204 Industrial 2,471 $2,151,608,400 $948,079,600 $3,099,688,000 Other 118 $17,323,900 $10,127,100 $27,451,000 Residential 152,664 $37,019,020,900 $12,174,561,800 $49,193,567,700 Utilities 536 $293,574,096 $53,070,200 $346,644,304 Dakota County Total 168,200 $45,014,964,496 $17,987,072,500 $63,002,022,008 Castle Rock Township Agricultural 429 $29,387,900 $138,139,900 $167,527,800 Commercial 28 $6,244,300 $2,947,000 $9,191,300 Exempt 67 $3,772,600 $3,305,300 $7,077,900 Industrial 47 $3,018,000 $1,540,400 $4,558,400 Other 4 $0 $0 $0 Residential 853 $113,366,100 $36,746,700 $150,112,800 Utilities 0 $172,500 $26,100 $198,600 Castle Rock Total 1,428 $155,961,400 $182,705,400 $338,666,800 Douglas Township Agricultural 486 $24,059,400 $132,705,800 $156,765,200 Commercial 9 $1,151,800 $2,069,200 $3,221,000 Exempt 11 $13,400 $14,026,500 $14,039,900 Residential 499 $58,227,500 $24,674,900 $82,902,400 Douglas Total 1,005 _ $83,452,100 $173,476,400 $256,928,500 Empire Township Agricultural 220 _ $12,213,600 $75,601,200 $87,814,800 Commercial 20 _ $3,108,400 $3,193,100 $6,301,500 Exempt 87 _ $26,629,800 $46,650,300 $73,280,100 Industrial 19 _ $3,725,400 $8,534,800 $12,260,200 Other 0 _ $0 $0 $0 Residential 1,392 _ $257,738,900 $82,646,400 $340,385,300 Utilities 2 $609,900 $157,900 $767,800 Page 109 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Community Total Estimated Building Estimated Land Total Value Structures Value Value Empire Total 1,740 $304,026,000 $216,783,700 $520,809,700 Eureka Township Agricultural 486 $37,767,800 $127,011,000 $164,778,800 Commercial 12 $1,460,600 $1,018,800 $2,479,400 Exempt 17 $6,783,800 $4,147,100 $10,930,900 Industrial 1 $608,200 $2,978,500 $3,586,700 Residential 904 $128,319,500 $52,407,500 $180,727,000 Utilities 5 $838,500 $94,600 $933,100 Eureka Total 1,425 $175,778,400 $187,657,500 $363,435,900 Greenvale Township Agricultural 332 $22,747,900 $108,322,800 $131,070,700 Commercial 7 $179,500 $317,800 $497,300 Exempt 0 $136,800 $1,024,800 $1,161,600 Industrial 3 $422,900 $201,400 $624,300 Residential 548 $68,064,500 $24,721,400 $92,785,900 Greenvale Total 890 $91,551,600 $134,588,200 $226,139,800 Hampton Township Agricultural 575 $32,839,000 $143,769,300 $176,608,300 Commercial 28 $763,000 $708,800 $1,471,800 Exempt 1 $0 $1,487,200 $1,487,200 Industrial 6 $617,200 $530,000 $1,147,200 Residential 488 $73,272,800 $27,439,300 $100,712,100 Utilities 0 $1,215,700 $52,700 $1,268,400 Hampton Total 1,098 $108,707,700 $173,987,300 $282,695,000 Marshan Township Agricultural 414 $25,595,300 $136,589,800 $162,185,100 Commercial 23 $3,373,300 $4,598,600 $7,971,900 Exempt 5 $1,596,400 $2,974,300 $4,570,700 Industrial 10 $2,086,400 $1,149,500 $3,235,900 Other 1 $0 $0 $0 Residential 669 $97,431,600 $39,190,500 $136,622,100 Utilities 1 $668,800 $149,500 $818,300 Marshan Total 1,123 $130,751,800 $184,652,200 $315,404,000 Nininger Township Agricultural 307 $10,336,500 $42,927,100 $53,263,600 Commercial 8 $1,084,000 $3,202,500 $4,286,500 Exempt 53 $1,088,000 $10,084,100 $11,172,100 Industrial 0 $0 $1,129,100 $1,129,100 Other 14 $0 $0 $0 Residential 677 $89,148,800 $39,886,500 $129,035,300 Utilities 3 $3,011,500 $966,800 $3,978,300 Nininger Total 1,062 $104,668,800 $98,196,100 $202,864,900 Randolph Township — Agricultural 78 $5,061,700 $31,549,800 $36,611,500 Commercial 19 $2,047,800 $2,632,600 $4,680,400 Exempt 20 $3,561,000 $3,298,800 $6,859,800 Industrial 5 $10,078,500 $5,448,400 $15,526,900 Other 0 $0 $0 $0 Residential 452 $78,966,000 $49,299,700 $128,265,700 Page 110 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Community Total Estimated Building Estimated Land Total Value Structures Value Value Utilities 3 $2,983,700 $174,600 $3,158,300 Randolph Total 577 $102,698,700 $92,403,900 $195,102,600 Ravenna Township Agricultural 159 $6,530,200 $31,749,100 $38,279,300 Commercial 3 $7,700 $90,200 $97,900 Exempt 0 $149,100 $4,013,600 $4,162,700 Other 2 $342,100 $98,700 $440,800 Residential 1,616 $234,893,600 $85,931,900 $320,825,500 Ravenna Total 1,780 $241,922,700 $121,883,500 $363,806,200 Sciota Township Agricultural 186 $11,655,200 $61,622,600 $73,277,800 Exempt 2 $406,000 $223,800 $629,800 Industrial 3 $0 $1,004,500 $1,004,500 Residential 284 $35,240,100 $14,448,400 $49,688,500 Sciota Total 475 $47,301,300 $77,299,300 $124,600,600 Vermillion Township Agricultural 504 $29,639,100 $137,852,500 $167,491,600 Commercial 6 $666,600 $442,600 $1,109,200 Exempt 4 $427,400 $1,819,500 $2,246,900 Industrial 7 $455,900 $778,800 $1,234,700 Other 18 $0 $0 $0 Residential 648 $105,005,300 $33,640,600 $138,645,900 Utilities 0 $4,242,100 $524,100 $4,766,200 Vermillion Total _ 1,187 $140,436,400 $175,058,100 $315,494,500_ Waterford Township Agricultural _ 205 $10,948,300 $54,992,800 $65,941,100 Commercial _ 23 $2,222,500 $2,006,300 $4,228,800 Exempt _ 3 $42,000 $2,153,600 $2,195,600 Industrial _ 24 $2,412,600 $1,194,200 $3,606,800 Residential 419 $40,145,800 $17,361,700 $57,507,500 Waterford Total 674 $55,771,200 $77,708,600 $133,479,800 Flood Repetitive Loss Properties 44 CFR Requirement§201.6(c)(2)(ii): [The risk assessment] must also address National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) insured structures that have been repetitively damaged by floods. As noted in the flood hazard profile in Section IV, Dakota County has experienced flood events over time, threatening public safety and damaging property and infrastructure. The purpose of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) is to eliminate or reduce the damage to property and the disruption of life caused by repeated flooding of the same properties. A property is considered a repetitive loss property when there are two or more insured losses (flood insurance claims) reported which were paid more than $1,000 for each loss. The two losses must be within ten years of each other and be at least ten days apart. A property is considered a severe repetitive loss (SRL) property either when there are at least four losses each exceeding$5,000 or when there are two or more losses where the building payments exceed the property value. Page 111 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Dakota County Repetitive Loss Information Based on data provided by FEMA Region V in 2022, 12 properties in Dakota County have flood loss histories and meet the definition of repetitive loss properties. Seven are non-residential parcels,four are single family housing, and one is multi-family housing. Table 5.8 summarizes current losses and amounts paid in insurance claims for buildings and their contents. Table 5.8 Summary of Repetitive Loss Flood Claims, Dakota County Repetitive Losses Total Building Total Content Total Payments Loss Properties Payments Payments 12 42 $1,782,720 $814,205 $2,596,925 Source:Dakota County Repetitive Loss Report,through the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources,2016 Community Participation in the National Flood Insurance Program Table 5.9 lists the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) participating communities in Dakota County, with the current map date,the number of policies in force, and the total insurance in force. In 2003, Dakota County modernized the Flood Insurance Rate Maps and Insurance Study to a county-wide digital format. FEMA issued its final letter of map determination with an effective date of Dec. 2, 2011. NFIP communities amended their floodplain ordinances and adopted the new FIS and digital flood insurance rate maps. Table 5.9 Participating Communities in the NFIP,Dakota County,2021 Community CID Number Current Effective Policies Insurance Map Date In Force In Force Dakota Co. 270101 12/2/11 25 $7,594,800 Apple Valley 270050 12/2/11 23 $5,601,000 Burnsville 270102 12/2/11 29 $9,625,600 Eagan 270103 12/2/11 39 $11,021,600 Farmington 270104 12/2/11 10 $2,878,000 Hastings 270105 3/16/16 13 $3,292,500 Inver Grove Heights 270106 12/2/11 16 $4,395,000 Lakeville 270107 12/2/11 63 $17,555,500 Lilydale 275241 12/2/11 5 $1,811,200 Mendota 270109 12/2/11 - - Mendota Heights 270110 12/2/11 9 $2,828,000 Randolph 270112 12/2/11 - - Rosemount 270113 12/2/11 6 $1,190,000 South St. Paul _ 270114 12/2/11 17 $11,652,400 Vermillion 270115 12/2/11 1 $350,000 West St. Paul 270729 (NSFHA) 10 $2,560,000 TOTAL 266 $82,355,600 Source:FEMA NFIP Insurance Report,MN DNR,9/29/2021 Page 112 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Table 5.10 summarizes NFIP claim activity for the County and participating communities from 1978 to 9/29/2021. A total of 136 claims have been filed, with a total $2,130.834 in payments since 1978. Table 5.10 Flood Insurance Claims and Payments,Dakota County Community Claims Total Payments Dakota County 32 $296,616 Apple Valley 3 $15,314 Burnsville 19 $474,030 Eagan 15 $48,485 Farmington 3 $5,519 Hastings 27 $179,056 Inver Grove Heights 7 $31,224 Lakeville 11 $14,809 Lilydale 30 $1,967,707 Mendota Heights 3 $11,520 Rosemount 3 $25,577 South St. Paul 7 $4,2720 West St. Paul 4 $33,637 164 $3,146,214 Source:FEMA NFIP Insurance Report,MN DNR,9/29/2021 Floodplain Structures Countywide Table 5.11 provides the total number and value of all structures within the digital flood insurance rate maps boundaries (DFIRM), at a County level and Table 5.12 provides this information for individual townships covered under the County plan. Data for participating cities are provided in Section VII. This building inventory was established for general risk analysis purposes. A more accurate count of buildings within the floodplain would require site-by-site analyses using lowest adjacent grade and lowest floor elevations; then comparing those elevations to known one-percent annual chance flood elevations and cross-sections within the respective Flood Insurance Study.The dollar totals listed below should not be interpreted as estimates of potential damage for any one event. Table 5.11 Total Floodplain Structure and Value Inventory,Dakota County Structure Type Total Structures Estimated Estimated Total Land Value Building Value Value Agricultural 40 $9,328,400 $4,795,400 $14,123,800 Commercial 37 $3,922,000 $4,112,600 $8,034,600 Exempt 140 $22,104,900 $46,175,400 $68,280,300 Industrial 64 $19,140,600 $21,642,500 $40,783,100 Residential 487 $84,688,100 $109,627,900 $194,316,000 Utilities 120 $13,216,300 $153,954,096 $167,170,404 Total 888 $152,400,300 $340,307,896 $492,708,204 Source:Dakota County Assessor's Office and Office of GIS Page 113 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Table 5.12 Total Floodplain Structure and Value Inventory,Dakota County Townships Structure Type Total Structures Estimated Land Estimated Total Value Value Building Value Castle Rock Township Agricultural 4 $869,400 $338,000 $1,207,400 Industrial 16 $140,200 $205,000 $345,200 Residential 2 $90,000 $54,400 $144,400 Castle Rock Total 22 $1,099,600 $597,400 $1,697,000 Douglas Township Agricultural 2 $1,245,200 $834,800 $2,080,000 Douglas Total 2 $1,245,200 $834,800 $2,080,000 Empire Township Agricultural 1 $4,600 $16,900 $21,500 Residential 32 $1,744,100 $4,892,600 $6,636,700 Empire Total 33 $1,748,700 $4,909,500 $6,658,200 Eureka Total 0 $0 $0 $0 Greenvale Township Agricultural 1 $17,300 $89,600 $106,900 Greenvale Total 1 $17,300 $89,600 $106,900 Hampton Township Agricultural 1 $691,500 $142,200 $833,700 Hampton Total 1 $691,500 $142,200 $833,700 Marshan Township Agricultural 1 $164,400 $412,400 $576,800 Residential 4 $449,500 $1,166,000 $1,615,500 Marshan Total 5 $613,900 $1,578,400 $2,192,300 Nininger Township Exempt 8 $605,500 $102,200 $707,700 Residential 5 $387,600 $136,200 $523,800 Nininger Total 13 $993,100 $238,400 $1,231,500 Randolph Township Agricultural 6 $1,060,300 $311,200 $1,371,500 Exempt 1 $674,900 $1,984,900 $2,659,800 Residential 1 $9,200 $0 $9,200 Randolph Total 8 $1,744,400 $2,296,100 $4,040,500 Ravenna Township Residential 4 $252,400 $585,100 $837,500 Ravenna Total 4 $252,400 $585,100 $837,500 Sciota Township Agricultural 3 $1,853,600 $643,400 $2,497,000 Sciota Total 3 $1,853,600 $643,400 $2,497,000 Vermillion Township Agricultural 8 $1,843,200 $1,185,100 $3,028,300 Exempt 1 $169,000 $0 $169,000 Residential 9 $630,900 $1,279,300 $1,910,200 Vermillion Total 18 $2,643,100 $2,464,400 $5,107,500 Waterford Township Agricultural 1 $586,100 $42,400 $628,500 Exempt 1 $66,700 $0 $66,700 Residential 2 $129,300 $159,100 $288,400 Waterford Total 4 $782,100 $201,500 $983,600 Source:Dakota County Assessor's Office and Office of GIS Page 114 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Potential Dollar Loss - Other Hazards Hypothetical property losses were estimated for the 'most likely worst-case scenario"for each hazard. For potential dollar loss to structures, no differentiation is made for variable impacts across the development types (e.g., residential, commercial, industrial. Loss projections for each hazard type are based on anticipated structural damage and the expected geographic extent of a worst-case event. For example, an F-4 or F-5 tornado might destroy nearly all structures within its path but is unlikely to destroy more than one percent of all structures within Dakota County. A static percentage for estimated losses was used with the total replacement value within each category, shown in Table 5.13. Several hazards profiled in this plan (infectious disease, water supply contamination, wastewater treatment plant failure, and drought) did not warrant building damage assessments. Table 5.13 Estimated Potential Dollar Loss to Building Inventory by Disaster Type,County-wide Damage Violent Tornado Terrorism Hazmat Structure Total Building Summer Storm (1 percent Incident Type Value (1 percent total (1 percent total (0.1 percent damage) total damage) damage) total damage) Agricultural $1,825,376,900 $18,253,769 $18,253,769 $18,253,769 $1,825,377 Commercial $4,507,688,900 $45,076,889 $45,076,889 $45,076,889 $4,507,689 Exempt $4,001,605,204 $40,016,052 $40,016,052 $40,016,052 $4,001,605 Industrial $3,099,688,000 $30,996,880 $30,996,880 $30,996,880 $3,099,688 Other $27,451,000 $274,510 $274,510 $274,510 $27,451 Residential $49,193,567,700 $491,935,677 $491,935,677 $491,935,677 $49,193,568 Utilities $346,644,304 $3,466,443 $3,466,443 $3,466,443 $346,644 County Total $63,002,022,008 $630,020,220 $630,020,220 $630,020,220 $63,002,022 Source:Dakota County Hazard Mitigation Team,2021 Structure Structural Fire Violent Winter Wildfire Type (0.1 percent Storm(0.01 (0.01 percent continued total damage) percent total total damage) damage) Agricultural $1,825,377 $182,538 $182,538 Commercial $4,507,689 $450,769 $450,769 Exempt $4,001,605 $400,161 $400,161 Industrial $3,099,688 $309,969 $309,969 Other $27,451 $2,745 $2,745 Residential $49,193,568 $4,919,357 $4,919,357 Utilities $346,644 $34,664 $34,664 County Total $63,002,022 $6,300,202 $6,300,202 Vulnerable Structures Manufactured Home and Recreational Vehicle Parks Manufactured homes are generally considered more vulnerable to hazard impacts than other housing, based on the method and materials used to fasten them to their foundation, weight to surface area ratios, building material characteristics, and other factors. The safety of inhabitants, bystanders, and first responders is of primary concern as mobile homes can become dislodged from their foundation or break apart during flood, high wind, and tornado events. Other considerations include secondary property and infrastructure damage and the environmental impacts of broken sewer and gas lines. Dakota County has 17 manufactured home parks with roughly 3,800 hundred trailer slots (by review of Page 115 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 available information). Manufactured home parks are shown on the map in Section III and on the detailed Critical Infrastructure maps located in Section VI. Recreational vehicles (RV) parks are likewise susceptible to violent storms. The County rents RV slots at the Lebanon Hills and Lake Byllesby park campgrounds. Please refer to park locations in Section III. Vulnerable Facilities by Jurisdiction Emergency managers from Dakota County's cities have rated the vulnerability of critical assets related to hazards. Table 5.14 lists significant facilities throughout the county. Table 5.14 Vulnerable Facilities(Table Redacted in Public Version of Plan) Facility and Location Potential Vulnerability Description: Page 116 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Vulnerability of Future Structures Community growth will be a factor in considering vulnerability to hazards (see Figure 5.11). Implementation of mitigation strategies, as well as existing ordinances and land use controls, will reduce vulnerability to certain hazards (e.g., wildfire, flood). Additional considerations include: Residential Growth Development in the county slowed from a peak of 4,200 housing units/year in 2004 to 609 in 2009 but has been slowly increasing with recovery from the Recession. New housing permits have grown from 1,766 in 2017 and a total of 2,480 housing permits in 2019. Most of the predicted residential growth is expected to occur in the jurisdictions of Lakeville, Farmington, Rosemount, and Empire Township. Commercial Growth Maxfield Research, Inc. (Minneapolis, MN) conducted a market study for Dakota County in 2008, projecting commercial and industrial needs in the county through 2030. The study found that projected growth will create demand for an additional 10 to 12 million square feet of commercial/retail space by 2030, or roughly 450-550 new buildings, based on the average size of a new commercial building constructed between 2000 and 2006. Demand for commercial land is projected to be greatest in Lakeville,Apple Valley, and Inver Grove Heights. Based on preliminary information provided in city comprehensive plans, land dedicated to commercial uses will expand by 9.2 percent between 2030 and 2040,from approximately 12,600 acres to 13,770 acres on a countywide basis. Page 117 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 All communities within the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area (TCMA) update their comprehensive plans every decade and provide Residential forecasts for growth in various sectors for the , ",, m&ISIne56,Comnlen.ial,InstiNtioral r,no _ ._6. 4 =Irdustrwl,hlming,and Utility next ten and twenty years. Comprehensive Park,Retleation,or Preuwe plans updates were completed in 2018-2019, L. Agricultural sVnAnnexaea - i- Urban Expansion/Annexation with forecasts for 2030 and 2040 population, Mixed Use employment, and land use. .. �0oer" "f70 °nC°rtidnrs Industrial Growth _.:`: '-� , !-- -- = ' . 1 _, Dakota County had an inventory of about 980 • i + •:Y E ..�. :: [ '~ Plr- industrial buildings with roughly 40 million �-" :- ' ' o�m q-. ' : square feet of space in 2007. Maxfield r.. • _ Research, Inc. projects an additional 7.6 to 8.7 1.. ..c.& "[^^"I1e off E M..o1.in..TW\� .. million square feet of industrial space will be - ;i ;`.:if; ,M • E�y .IIicn C ‘:1-" added between 2008 and 2030, roughly 260— "m— 310 new buildings based on the average size of "•-T' ' `""wilie. a new industrial building constructed between ELlretiiiTWP R,.T, Hemp nPAT il Pouyrae Two II 2000 and 2006. Demand for industrial land is projected to be greatest in Rosemount, Inver t 1 I Grove Heights, and Apple Valley. a. ..w.r.0 w.,..,. ,,,M,-.,, T. I Data compiled from city comprehensive plans Not Ih MN1 shows a slight drop of 2.2 percent in industrial Figure 5.10 Future Land Use, 2040 land use acres between 2030 and 2040. Page 118 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 SECTION VI - DAKOTA COUNTY GOALS AND STRATEGIES Section IV documents how natural and technological hazards affect Dakota County. Section V evaluates risks each hazard poses to the County's people and physical assets and discusses areas of vulnerability. This section details Dakota County's specific goals and strategies developed for each hazard to address vulnerabilities. Goals express desired outcomes related to the major hazards of concern in Dakota County. Strategies are "action steps"toward reaching the goals and will be implemented under the guidance of the County Board of Commissioners. Goals and strategies are outcomes of the planning process outlined in Section II. Strategy development began with a progress review of strategies in the 2016 plan,to identify efforts that were complete, efforts that are part of ongoing program operations that should carry forward to the plan update, and efforts that were no longer needed (see Appendix III for 2016 plan progress reports). New strategies were developed with input from County departments,jurisdictions, community groups, and the public. Strategies are presented with the following information: • Implementation priority(based on need and whether the strategy builds on existing efforts) • A modified STAPLEE rating that estimates the ease of implementation (Low, Medium, High) • Implementation path through new or existing processes and programs within the County • Hazards addressed by the strategy • Status of the strategy—ongoing efforts or specific initiatives with an estimated completion date • Funding status and likely funding sources • The lead department and position title responsible for coordinating action The planning team also used modified STAPLEE criteria to evaluate each strategy against seven areas of consideration listed in Table 1. Strategies that scored higher have fewer implementation barriers. Table 6.1: Modified STAPLEE Evaluation of Strategies Modified STAPLEE Scoring: 1=does not meet criteria,2=somewhat meets criteria, or 3=meets or exceeds criteria 1. Social Impacts: community acceptance likely, benefits segment of population 2. Technical: feasible, provides long-term solution, has secondary benefits 3. Administrative: staffing available, funding allocated, operations needs can be addressed 4. Political: political support, local champion, and public support are likely 5. Legal: state and/or local authority exists, low likelihood of legal challenges 6. Economic: beneficial, affordable, contributes to economic goals, outside funding available 7. Environmental: benefits natural resources, increases safety, supports local goals and federal law With a minimum possible STAPLEE score of 7 and a maximum possible score of 21, the following ranges were used to group scores: 17—21: High (easier to implement) 11-16: Medium (moderately easy to implement) 7—10: Low (more challenging to implement) The following strategies are for Dakota County as a whole; city-level strategies are presented in Section VI of this plan. Page 119 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Communication, Coordination, and Education Goals Communication and education support mitigation efforts for most hazards addressed by this plan: Communication Goal 1: Increase public awareness of hazard mitigation and disaster preparedness Strategies: 1. Continue to provide comprehensive public information on disaster mitigation and preparedness,using the County website and/or social media as primary resources for clear information on: • Getting immediate help • Home emergency planning(e.g.,evaluation routes,family communication) • Home emergency kits(water,food, medication, personal care, batteries, rechargers) • Staying informed during emergencies • Learning CPR • Hazard-specific information (e.g.,tornadoes,storms, diseases) • County emergency planning Priority: High Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE:High Implementation: Annual work planning Hazards: All Funding Source: Partly Funded/Budget Lead: Dakota County Communications, Director(DCC-D); Dakota County Emergency Management, Risk and Homeland Security Manager(DCEM-RHSM) 2. Develop an annual seasonal outreach campaign on topics such as severe weather awareness(April)and winter weather preparedness(November)to reach residents directly through targeted mailings,articles in the Dakota County Newsletter,and news releases. Priority:High Status/Completion: New/Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Annual work planning Hazards: All Funding Source: Partly Funded/Budget Lead: DCC-D, DCEM-RHSM 3. Routinely include questions on household emergency preparedness in scientific residential surveys,to estimate the level of preparedness in Dakota County over time. Priority:Medium Implementation: Biennial survey development STAPLEE: High process Hazards: All Funding Source: Partly Funded/Budget Status/Completion: Ongoing Lead: Office of Performance Analysis(OPA), Manager, DCEM-RHSM Communication Goal 2:Communicate and coordinate on hazard mitigation and preparedness. Strategies: 1. Continue to regularly meet with city law enforcement,fire departments,emergency managers,public health,hospitals,and emergency medical services as the Domestic Preparedness Committee(DPC). Priority: High Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Regular interagency meetings Hazards: All Funding Source: Funded/Budget Lead: DCEM-RHSM 2. Annually review status of City and County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan strategies with the DPC.** Priority: High Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Regular interagency meetings Hazards: All Funding Source: Funded/Budget Lead: Dakota County Emergency Management, Risk and Homeland Security Manager(DCEM-RHSM) 3. Enhance media communications training opportunities for staff and elected officials. Priority:Medium Status/Completion: New/Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Training Planning Hazards: All Funding Source:Funded-Staff Time/Budget Lead: Dakota County Communications Page 120 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 4. Coordinate training,exercise,and response opportunities with Minnesota Volunteers Assisting in Disasters (MNVOAD). Priority:Medium Status/Completion: New/Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Training Planning Hazards: All Funding Source:Funded-Staff Time/Budget Lead: DCEM-RHSM *Reduces risk to buildings or infrastructure **Evaluates a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions;identifies which actions were selected for implementation Natural Disaster Mitigation Goals Drought Mitigation Goals Drought Goal 1: Work toward adequate water supply protection in Dakota County. Strategies: 1. Encourage and assist public water suppliers in developing and implementing Water Supply plans. Priority:Medium Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Program operations Hazards: Drought Funding Source: Partly Funded/Budget Lead: DCER-Groundwater Protection Program Supervisor(DCER-GPPS) Drought Goal 2: Monitor the County's ground water quality,supplies,and demands. Strategies: 1. Review existing groundwater monitoring and modeling programs and determine any needs for additional groundwater monitoring. Priority:Medium Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Program operations Hazards: Drought Funding Source: Funded/Budget Lead: DCER-GPPS 2. Participate in the Metropolitan Area Water Supply Advisory Committee,Southwest Groundwater Work Group,and Southeast Groundwater Work Group. Priority:Medium Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Meeting attendance Hazards: Drought Funding Source: Funded/Budget Lead: DCER-GPPS Drought Goal 3: Preserve existing groundwater resources. Strategies: 1. Promote and support water conservation and water reuse projects. Priority:High Status/Completion: New STAPLEE: High Implementation: Interagency coordination Hazards: Drought Funding Source: Partly Funded/Budget, potential grants Lead: DCER-Groundwater Protection Program Supervisor(DCER-GPPS) 2. Protect and improve high quality groundwater recharge areas. Priority:Medium Status/Completion: New STAPLEE: Medium Implementation: Secure grant funding Hazards: Drought Funding Source: Not Funded,grants needed Lead: DCER-Groundwater Protection Program Supervisor(DCER-GPPS) Principal Contact: Dakota County Environmental Resources-Groundwater Protection Program Supervisor Cooperating Partners: Dakota County Office of Planning, Dakota County Public Health, MN Departments of Health and Natural Resources, Minnesota Geologic Survey, Metropolitan Council. Page 121 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Flood Mitigation Goals Flood Goal 1: Address 100-year flood risks in all jurisdictions through land use planning and management. Strategies: 1. Annually review floodplain zoning ordinance(Ordinance No.50)for compliance with state and federal regulations with respect to nonconforming structures and update as necessary. Priority: Medium Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Ordinance updates Hazards: Flood Funding Source: Partly Funded/Budget Lead: Shoreland Floodplain Prog. Supv. (DCER-SFPS 2. Encourage city and county participation in FEMA Community Rating System program. Coordinate with townships on floodplain permit review. Priority: Low Status/Completion: New STAPLEE: High Implementation: Code/ordinance enforcement Hazards: Flood Funding Source: Not Funded Lead: DCER-SFPS Flood Goal 2: Pursue acquisition of repetitive loss structures. Strategies: 1. Coordinate with MN HSEM and MN DNR Flood Damage Reduction Program to secure funding to acquire repetitive loss structures from willing sellers.* Priority: High Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Grant requests Hazards: Flood Funding Source: Not Funded Lead: DCER-SFPS Flood Goal 3: Use land protection and natural resource management to mitigate flood risks. Strategies: 1. Protect and restore larger cultivated-drained wetlands for water retention to reduce flood severity.* Priority: Medium Status/Completion: New STAPLEE: Low Implementation: Install BMPs Hazards: Water Supply Contamination Funding Source: External funds will be sought Lead: DCER-GPPS, DCER-Land Conservation 2. Use Conservation Focus Areas**to prioritize,protect,and restore wetlands,shoreland,headwaters and significant groundwater recharge areas to reduce flood impacts. Priority: Medium Status/Completion: New STAPLEE: Medium Implementation: Program operations Hazards: Water Supply Contamination Funding Source: External funds will be sought Lead: DCER-GPPS, DCER-Land Conservation,SWCD *Reduces risk to buildings or infrastructure ** Evaluates a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions; identifies which actions were selected for implementation Principal Contact: Dakota County Environmental Resources-Shoreland Floodplain Program Supervisor Cooperating Partners: city planning/zoning commissions, councils, and administrators;township officials; MN DNR Page 122 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Infectious Disease Outbreak Mitigation Goals Infectious Disease Goal 1: Ensure effective and coordinated response to preventing and controlling infectious disease. Strategies: 1. Work with state and federal agencies to identify infectious diseases that could affect the county and region. Priority:High Implementation: Coordinate with MDH, STAPLEE: Medium monitor/report via MDH infectious disease Hazards: Infectious Disease reporting protocol Status/Completion: Ongoing Funding Source: Funded/Budget Lead: County Public Health, Director(DCPH-D) 2. Utilize federal,state,and local resources to prevent and control infectious diseases in the county. Priority:High Implementation: Seek Federal/State Public STAPLEE: High Health Emergency Preparedness grants. Use Hazards: Infectious Disease State Community Health funding to maintain- Status/Completion: Ongoing improve disease prevention and control. Funding Source: Funded/Budget Lead: DCPH-D 3. Maintain regular communication with clinic and hospital partners to share information about infectious disease preparedness and response. Priority:High Implementation: Maintain Health Alert Network STAPLEE: Medium (HAN), regularly meet with Dakota County Hospitals Hazards: Infectious Disease Funding Source: Funded/Budget Status/Completion: Ongoing Lead: DCPH-D 4. Provide information on the recognition,testing,treating,and reporting of infectious diseases to healthcare providers in clinics,hospitals,and other healthcare settings. Priority:High Implementation: Maintain HAN, meet regularly STAPLEE: High with Dakota County hospital partners. Hazards: Infectious Disease Funding Source: Funded/Budget Status/Completion: Ongoing Lead: DCPH-D 5. Work with clinics and hospitals to improve infectious disease reporting. Priority:High Implementation: On-site meetings with clinical STAPLEE: High staff.Timely information via varied Hazards: Infectious Disease communications, HAN. Status/Completion: Ongoing Funding Source: Funded/Budget Lead: DCPH-D 6. Maintain an up-to-date Health Alert Network(HAN)system to keep clinics,hospitals,other health care providers,public safety agencies,schools,local governments,and others informed of urgent health/infectious disease events. Priority:High Implementation: Periodic HAN evaluation and STAPLEE: High update Hazards: Infectious Disease Funding Source: Funded/Budget Status/Completion: Ongoing Lead: DCPH-D Page 123 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 7. Annually review and update the public health emergency response operations plan that outlines procedures for dealing with infectious diseases. Priority:High Implementation: Review, update,approve STAPLEE: High plans. Coordinate with partners to identify gaps Hazards: Infectious Disease in plans. Status/Completion: Ongoing/each fall Funding Source: Funded/Budget Lead: DCPH-D 8. Continue to work with local hospitals and clinics to coordinate an effective infectious disease response. Priority:High Implementation: Coordinated, regular partner STAPLEE: High meetings with hospitals and Public Health Hazards: Infectious Disease Funding Source: Funded/Budget Status/Completion: Ongoing Lead: DCPH-D 9. Work with the MDH in surveillance of infectious diseases in the county. For diseases that may transfer from livestock to humans,continue work with MDH,MN Department of Agriculture,the University of MN Veterinary College,and Agricultural Extension. Priority:High Implementation: Coordinated interagency STAPLEE: Medium surveillance and communications with MDH, per Hazards: Infectious Disease protocol Status/Completion: Ongoing Funding Source: Funded/Budget Lead: DCPH-D 10. Work closely with MDH,CDC,and regional public health partners to plan receipt and dispensing of the Strategic National Stockpile. Priority:High Implementation: Plan,drill,exercise SNS STAPLEE: High emergency plans, per MDH grant Hazards: Infectious Disease guidelines/agreements Status/Completion: Ongoing Funding Source: Funded/Budget Lead: DCPH-D 11. Maintain a human quarantine plan collaborating with state,regional,and local partners including emergency managers. Priority:High Implementation: Review/update isolation- STAPLEE: Medium quarantine plans annually. Coordinate with Hazards: Infectious Disease partners. Status/Completion: ongoing Funding Source: Partly Funded/Budget Lead: DCPH-D 12. Work closely regional partners In the Metro Health&Medical Preparedness Coalition to stay informed about planning, response,and recovery activities for events or emergencies with public health and medical implications. Priority:High Implementation: Coordination-collaboration STAPLEE: High with partners Hazards: Infectious Disease Funding Source: Funded/Budget Status/Completion: Ongoing Lead: DCPH-D *Reduces risk to buildings or infrastructure.** Evaluates a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions;identifies actions selected for implementation. Modified STAPLEE implementation score:higher scores indicate fewer barriers Principal Contact: Dakota County Public Health Department, Director. Cooperating Partners: Minnesota Department of Health, health care providers, hospitals and clinics,County school systems, nursing homes, local emergency managers Page 124 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Infectious Disease Goal 2: Provide information to the public on infectious disease threats. Strategies: 1. Work with the Minnesota Public Health Department(MDH)to develop and distribute fact sheets,media releases,and educational programs for the public. Priority:High Implementation: Coordinate-collaborate with STAPLEE: Medium MDH and regional and local partners Hazards: Infectious Disease Funding Source: Partly Funded/Budget Status/Completion: New/TBD Lead: DCPH-D 2. Continue to work with local media to disseminate information about infectious diseases,risk potential,and prevention through education articles and news releases. Priority:High Implementation: Coordinate news releases with STAPLEE: High County Communications, maintain media Hazards: Infectious Disease relationships with regular information Status/Completion: Ongoing Funding Source: Funded/Budget Lead: DCPH-D 3. Maintain up-to-date website information and/or links to other sources of reliable information about infectious diseases and prevention. Priority:Medium Implementation: Collaborate with MDH and STAPLEE: High partners, develop targeted web info for defined Hazards: Infectious Disease populations Status/Completion: Ongoing Funding Source: Partly Funded/Budget Lead: DCPH-D Principal Contact: Dakota County Public Health Department, Director. Responsible Parties: Dakota County Public Health Department, Minnesota Department of Health, Dakota County Public Information Officer. Cooperating Partners: public media, Dakota County cities Infectious Disease Pandemic Mitigation Goals Pandemic Goal 1: Maintain public health response preparedness. Strategies: 1. Develop and exercise Public Health pandemic preparedness plans. Priority:High Strategic National Stockpile, Pandemic STAPLEE: Medium Influenza). Plan and implement periodic Hazards: Pandemic functional and full-scale exercises related to the Status/Completion: Ongoing plans listed above. Collaborate with community Implementation: Review-update public health partners on development of planning and preparedness plans used for pandemic response exercising plans. (e.g. Isolation &Quarantine, Mass Dispensing, Funding Source: Funded/Budget Lead: County Public Health, Director(DCPH-D) 2. Maintain adequate levels of PPE. Priority:High quantities used during COVID-19 pandemic. STAPLEE: Medium Maintain PPE at baseline levels and replace Hazards: Epidemic/Pandemic when supply is expired/used. Status/Completion: New/Ongoing Funding Source: TBD Implementation:Review current PPE supply and establish baseline quantities of PPE based on Lead: County Public Health, Director(DCPH-D) Page 125 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 3. Conduct after-action reviews to identify needs and update response,continuity of operations,and mitigation plans accordingly. Priority:High Implementation:Complete after-action review STAPLEE: Medium of the COVID-19 pandemic response. Develop Hazards: Epidemic/Pandemic plan for implementing improvement items. Status/Completion: New/Ongoing Funding Source: Funded/Budget Lead: County Public Health, Director(DCPH-D) 4. Develop/maintain a communication strategy for hard-to-reach/limited English proficiency populations and ADA accessible communications. Priority:Medium information for defined populations through a STAPLEE: High variety of communication channels. Continue Hazards: Infectious Disease annual review of Public Health Risk Information Status/Completion: New/Ongoing &Communication plan with focus on planning Implementation: Collaborate with county for LEP and ADA accessible communications. communications to develop targeted Funding Source: Funded/Budget Lead: DCPH-D 5. Ensure that Continuity of Operations Plans address potential needs during a long-term pandemic with adequate technological systems,staff ability to work remotely,supplies and vehicles,and new service delivery methods. Priority:Medium Implementation: COOP plan updates every STAPLEE: Medium other year,annual purchasing practices, Hazards: Infectious Disease program operations. Status/Completion: New/Ongoing Funding Source: Funded/Budget, potential grants Lead: DCEM-RMHS, DC IT, County Admin. Principal Contact: Dakota County Public Health Department, Director. Responsible Parties: Dakota County Public Health Department, Minnesota Department of Health, Dakota County Public Information Officer, Dakota County Emergency Management, Dakota County Information Technology, Dakota County Administration. Cooperating Partners: public media, Dakota County cities Infectious Disease strategies also apply to Pandemic preparedness goals. Landslide Mitigation Goals Landslide Goal 1: Reduce vulnerability of infrastructure to landsides in Dakota County.* Strategies: 1. Address vulnerabilities in the County Road System related to saturated soil conditions that can cause landslides or retaining wall failures. Maintain an inventory of retaining walls and prioritize replacements.* Priority:Medium Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: Low Implementation: Capital improvement planning Hazards: Landslide Funding Source: Partly Funded/CIP Lead: Dakota County Transportation,County Engineer(DCT-CE) 2. Address vulnerabilities in the County Trail System related to saturated soil conditions that can cause landslides. Identify and maintain an inventory of high hazard areas to mitigate the potential for erosion and landslides.* Priority:Medium Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: Low Implementation: Capital improvement planning Hazards: Landslide Funding Source: Partly Funded Lead: DCT-CE; Facilities Maintenance, Parks *Reduces risk to buildings or infrastructure **Evaluates a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions;identifies which actions were selected for implementation Page 126 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Violent Storms and Extreme Temperatures Mitigation Goals Storms Goal 1: Ensure that there is safe and accessible shelter from violent storms Strategies: 1. Maintain safe shelter plans for County-owned facilities including shelters,shelter capacity,and exit routes. Priority: High Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Annual work planning Hazards:Violent Storms, Extreme Temperatures Funding Source: Funded/Budget Lead: DCEM-RHSM 2. Work with City Emergency Managers and the Red Cross to assure that safe shelter locations across the County and surrounding area(as needed)are evaluated by or for the Red Cross as approved shelters with agreements in place. Priority:Medium Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Interagency coordination Hazards:Violent Storms, Extreme Temperatures Funding Source: Part Funded/Budget Lead: DCEM-RHSM 3. Construct storm shelter safe rooms at manufactured home parks/communities,County campgrounds,and publicly owned athletic fields or golf courses. Priority: High Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: Medium Implementation: Capital planning,grants Hazards:Violent Storms, Extreme Temperatures Funding Source: Part Funded/CIP Lead: DCEM-RHSM Storms Goal 2: Improve the severe storm warning system for all residents Strategies: 1. Evaluate the County's outdoor warning system activation policy and procedures with local emergency managers on a periodic basis and communicate any changes with the Dakota Communications Center(DCC). Priority: High Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Annual interagency coordination Hazards:Violent Storms, Extreme Temperatures Funding Source: Funded/Budget Lead: DCEM-RHSM 2. Coordinate with DCC and local emergency managers to implement the Integrated Public Awareness Warning System (IPAWS)emergency notifications from DCC. Priority: High Status/Completion: Ongoing/TBD STAPLEE: High Implementation: Interagency coordination Hazards:Violent Storms, Extreme Temperatures Funding Source: Funded/Budget Lead: DCC,Operations Manager 3. Develop a communications plan to notify vulnerable populations to take steps to protect themselves. Priority:Medium Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Work plan, interagency coordination Hazards:Violent Storms, Extreme Temperatures Funding Source: Not Funded Lead: DCEM-RHSM 4. Continue participation with Amateur Radio Emergency Services(ARES)group for severe storm spotters and communications network volunteers. Priority:Low Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Interagency coordination Hazards:Violent Storms, Extreme Temperatures Funding Source: Funded/Budget Lead: DCEM-RHSM *Reduces risk to buildings or infrastructure **Evaluates a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions;identifies which actions were selected for implementation Page 127 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Principal Contact: Dakota County Emergency Management-Risk and Homeland Security Manager. Cooperating Partners:city emergency managers,city and county parks,townships, National Weather Service,County GIS, county law enforcement, County Transportation,and Amateur Radio Emergency Services (ARES) Storms Goal 3: Protect people and public infrastructure Strategies: 1. Communicate with public safety officials and State/county/city/township transportation departments to limit travel on major transportation routes during hazardous driving conditions. Priority: High Implementation: Interagency coordination, STAPLEE: Medium emergency operations Hazards:Violent Storms, Extreme Temperatures Funding Source: Funded/Budget Status/Completion: Ongoing Lead: DCEM-RHSM 2. Review and improve methods to notify Dakota County staff and facilities to provide adequate warning for severe weather emergencies in the field and the office environment. Update as needed. Priority:High Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Annual work planning Hazards:Violent Storms, Extreme Temperatures Funding Source: Partly Funded/Budget Lead: DCEM-RHSM 3. Periodically evaluate and update systems for lightning detection and notification protocols for outdoor public venues,such as the Dakota County Fairgrounds or Dakota County Park System. Priority: High Implementation: Capital improvement planning STAPLEE: High Funding Source: Not Funded/Capital Hazards:Violent Storms, Extreme Temperatures Improvement Plan Status/Completion: Ongoing Lead: DCEM-RHSM 4. Maintain storm debris management guidelines and update as necessary. Priority:High Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Debris Mgmt. Plan updates Hazards:Violent Storms, Extreme Temperatures Funding Source: Partly Funded/Budget Lead: Environmental Resources-Director(DCER-D) 5. Proactively manage stormwater infrastructure(e.g.,maintain drainage ditches,replace culverts). Conduct hydrological assessments based on NOAA Atlas 14 Precipitation Frequency estimates to determine appropriate capacity.* Priority:High Implementation:Service level agreement, STAPLEE: Medium annual work planning Hazards:Violent Storms, Extreme Temperatures Funding Source: Partly Funded/Budget, CIP Status/Completion: Ongoing Lead: Transp.-County Engineer(DCT-CE); DCER-D 6. Evaluate and modify/rebuild roads and trails that become vulnerable to repetitive flooding and washouts.* Priority: Medium Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: Medium Implementation: Capital improvement planning Hazards:Violent Storms, Extreme Temperatures Funding Source: Partly Funded/CIP Lead: DCT-CE 7. Maintain river flow by clearing debris from under bridges during storm-flooding events.* Priority:High Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Annual work planning Hazards:Violent Storms, Extreme Temperatures Funding Source: Partly Funded/Budget Lead: DCT-CE Page 128 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 8. Install power back-up systems to maintain traffic signal operation at high-volume intersections in outages. Priority:Medium-High Status/Completion: New/TBD STAPLEE: Medium Implementation: Capital improvement planning Hazards:Violent Storms, Extreme Temperatures Funding Source: Partly Funded/CIP Lead: DCT-CE *Reduces risk to buildings or infrastructure **Evaluates a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions;identifies which actions were selected for implementation Principal Contact: Dakota County Emergency Management-Risk and Homeland Security Manager; Dakota County Transportation-County Engineer. Cooperating Partners:County public safety agencies,transportation and public works, local planning commissions, County and city planning staff,city emergency managers,township officials, Dakota County Environmental Resources, and utilities Wildfire Mitigation Goals Wildfire Goal 1: Reduce wildfire risk. Strategies: 1. Annually evaluate prescribed burning on all county lands and parks with Minnesota DNR and local jurisdictions. Priority: High Implementation: Permit process,contractor STAPLEE: High certification Hazards: Wildfire Funding Source: Partly Funded/Budget Status/Completion: Ongoing Lead: Dakota County Parks, Natural Resources Manager 2. Provide an education program for property owners in identified risk areas on practices for reducing or minimizing wildfire risk.* Priority:Low Status/Completion: Ongoing,as needed STAPLEE: High Implementation: Program operations,work planning Hazards: Wildfire Funding Source: Partly Funded/Budget Lead: DCEM-RHSM *Reduces risk to buildings or infrastructure **Evaluates a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions;identifies which actions were selected for implementation Principal Contact: Dakota County Emergency Management-Risk and Homeland Security Manager, Dakota County Parks-Natural Resources Manager. Cooperating Partners: Minnesota DNR,Vermillion Highlands Operations Committee, local fire marshals,city and County park departments Page 129 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Technological and Human-Induced Disaster Mitigation Goals Civil Disturbance Mitigation Goals Civil Disturbance Goal 1: Improve situational awareness and monitoring efforts. Strategies: 1. Monitor situations with potential for inciting disturbance across a wide range of communication channels, including social media. Priority:Medium Status/Completion: New/ongoing STAPLEE: Medium-High Implementation: Program operations Hazards: Civil Unrest Funding Source: Existing Budget Lead: Dakota County Sheriff's Office, Risk/Emergency Management Principal Contact: Dakota County Sheriff, Risk/Emergency Management. Cooperating Partners: MN Fusion Center, Dakota County Crime Analysts, Dakota County Communications. Civil Disturbance Goal 2: Build community partnerships to promote timely response. Strategies: 1. Maintain a coordinated joint emergency operation center to improve response. Priority:High Status/Completion: New/ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Program operations Hazards: Civil Unrest Funding Source: Existing Budget Lead: Dakota County Sheriff's Office, Risk/Emergency Management 2. Build partnerships and agreements to enhance communications,with cities,key community liaisons,and community groups. Priority:Medium Status/Completion: New/ongoing STAPLEE: Medium Implementation: Program operations Hazards: Civil Unrest Funding Source: Existing Budget Lead: Dakota County Sheriff's Office, Risk/Emergency Management,City police chiefs. 3. Work on curfew implementation plan template with community emergency managers and local law enforcement. Priority:Medium Status/Completion: New/ STAPLEE: Medium Implementation: Interagency coordination Hazards: Civil Unrest Funding Source: Existing Budget Lead: Dakota County Sheriff's Office, Risk/Emergency Management Principal Contact: Dakota County Sheriff, Risk/Emergency Management.Cooperating Partners: City law enforcement,city administration, elected officials, Dakota County Communications. Civil Disturbance Goal 3: Increase training to reduce injuries and damages from civil disturbance. Strategies: 1. Train response personnel to protect the health and safety of the public in events,including de-escalation and non-lethal methods of riot control. Priority:Medium Status/Completion: New/ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Program operations Hazards: Civil Unrest Funding Source: Existing budget Lead: Dakota County Sheriff's Office, Risk/Emergency Management. 2. Develop plans to improve two-way communications between public authorities and participants,and strengthen outgoing public communications including social media and IPAWS. Priority:Medium Implementation: Program operations,work STAPLEE: High planning Hazards: Civil Unrest Funding Source: Existing budget Status/Completion: New/ Lead: Dakota County Sheriff's Office, Risk/Emergency Management,Communications, Dakota County Communications Center Page 130 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 3. Regularly exercise plans that address response to civil disturbance. Priority:High Status/Completion: New/ongoing STAPLEE: Low-Medium Implementation: Program operations Hazards: Civil Unrest Funding Source: Existing budget Lead: Dakota County Sheriff's Office, Risk/Emergency Management Principal Contact: Dakota County Sheriff, Risk/Emergency Management.Cooperating Partners:Communications, Dakota County Communications Center, City law enforcement. Civil Disturbance Goal 4: Reinforce security and resilience of County facilities and infrastructure likely to be targeted during civil disturbance. Strategies: 1. Evaluate options to strengthen building security infrastructure,including windows,doors,and entry points, and implement improvements. Priority:Medium Implementation: Program operations, work STAPLEE: Medium planning Hazards: Civil Unrest Funding Source: CIP,grants Status/Completion: New/ongoing Lead: Dakota County Facilities Management, Dakota County Sheriff's Office, Risk/Emergency Management. 2. Develop and update a facility preparedness checklist for civil disturbance situations. Priority:High Implementation: Program operations,work STAPLEE: High planning Hazards: Civil Unrest Funding Source: Existing budget Status/Completion: New/ongoing Lead: Dakota County Facilities Management,Dakota County Sheriff's Office, Risk/Emergency Management. 3. Compile detailed site maps and make improvements to facilitate rapid deployment of security barriers,such as pre-placement of fence post sleeves. Priority:High Implementation: Program operations, work STAPLEE: Medium planning Hazards: Civil Unrest Funding Source: CIP Status/Completion: New Lead: Dakota County Facilities Management,Dakota County Sheriff's Office, Risk/Emergency Management Principal Contact: Dakota County Sheriff, Dakota County Facilities Management, Risk/Emergency Management. Cooperating Partners: City law enforcement. Civil Disturbance Goal 5: Restore and maintain public confidence in County governance in the aftermath of civil disturbance. Strategies: 1. Evaluate civil disturbance causes and the County's response through after-action review with partner agencies and community groups. Priority: High Status/Completion: New/ongoing STAPLEE: Medium Implementation: Program operations Hazards: Civil Unrest Funding Source:Budget Lead: Dakota County Sheriff's Office, Risk/Emergency Management. Principal Contact: Dakota County Attorney,Sheriff, Risk/Emergency Management.Cooperating Partners:City law enforcement,elected officials. Page 131 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Cyber-Attack Mitigation Goals Cyber-Attack Goal 1: Reduce Cyber Security Risk to County Network Infrastructure and Software Strategies: 1. Continue completing cyber security exercises as part of COOP planning Priority: High Implementation: Regular COOP STAPLEE: Medium training/exercises Hazards: Cyber-Attack Funding Source: Budget/Grants Status/Completion: Ongoing Lead: IT/DCEM-RHSM. 2. Regularly develop programs and projects to identify and address cyber-security weaknesses and new threats(e.g., USB lockdown,vendor management) Priority: High-Medium Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: High-Medium Implementation: Project development Hazards: Cyber-Attack Funding Source: Funded/Budget/Grants Lead: IT 3. Continue ongoing staff training in cyber security and new threats. Priority: High Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Regular scheduling Hazards: Cyber-Attack Funding Source: Funded/Budget Lead: IT 4. Invest in hardware and IT infrastructure improvements(e.g.,encrypted storage). Priority: High Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: Medium Implementation: CEP Planning Hazards: Cyber-Attack Funding Source: Funded/Budget/Grants Lead: IT 5. Periodically review best practices through the IT Change Advisory Team and Information Management Security Committee(IMSC). Priority: Medium Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Team coordination Hazards: Cyber-Attack Funding Source: Funded/Budget Lead: IT 6. Communicate with cities regarding strategies for infrastructure protection and cyber-security and participate in local forums such as League of MN Cities,Association of MN Counties,on information sharing. Priority: Medium Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Interagency coordination Hazards: Cyber-Attack Funding Source: Funded/Budget Lead: IT/DCEM-RHSM Principal Contact: Dakota County Information Technology(IT)-Manager.Cooperating Partners: Dakota County Emergency Manager, Dakota County Capital Planning Department, Dakota County Facilities Management, Dakota County Sheriff's Office, public safety agencies, and critical infrastructure plant managers. Page 132 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Dam, Bridge, and Structural Failure Mitigation Goals Structural Failure Goal 1: Maintain continued structural integrity of dams and bridges in Dakota County. Strategies: 1. Continue implementation of Federal Energy Regulatory Commission(FERC)dam safety requirements at the County-owned Byllesby Dam. Priority:High Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Budgeting process Hazards: Dam, Bridge, Structural Failure Funding Source: Funded/Budget Lead: DC Senior Water Resources Engineer) 2. Regularly inspect and maintain bridges and update the bridge replacement list to ensure that potential deficiencies are addressed. Priority:High Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Annual work planning Hazards: Dam, Bridge,Structural Failure Funding Source: Partly Funded/Budget Lead: DCT-CE Principal Contact: Dakota County Water Resources-Senior Water Resources Engineer, Dakota County Emergency Management-Risk-Homeland Security Manager, Dakota County Transportation-County Engineer and Bridge Inspection Program Administrator. Cooperating Partners:Goodhue County, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Eagle Creek Renewable Energy, and Army Corps of Engineers Structural Failure Goal 2: Protect residents'safety downstream of Lake Byllesby Dam. Strategies: 1. Annually coordinate Dakota County Environmental Resources,Goodhue County,Cannon Falls,and other emergency providers to exercise the Lake Byllesby Dam Emergency Action Plan(EAP)required by FERC.* Priority:Medium Implementation: Exercise planning, interagency STAPLEE: High coordination Hazards: Dam, Bridge,Structural Failure Funding Source: Partly Funded/Budget Status/Completion: Ongoing Lead: DC Senior Water Resources Engineer 2. Monitor reservoir elevations and effectively communicate conditions to downstream interests as warranted. Priority:High Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Program operations Hazards: Dam, Bridge,Structural Failure Funding Source: Funded/Budget Lead: DC Senior Water Resources Engineer 3. Enforce the Byllesby Dam security plan elements and public safety rules,per FERC requirements.* Priority:High Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Program operations Hazards: Dam, Bridge,Structural Failure Funding Source: Funded/Budget Lead: DC Senior Water Resources Engineer *Reduces risk to buildings or infrastructure **Evaluates a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions;identifies which actions were selected for implementation Principal Contact: Dakota County Water Resources-Senior Water Resources Engineer. Cooperating Partners: Goodhue County, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, MN Department of Natural Resources, local public safety agencies,County emergency managers,and County sheriffs Page 133 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Hazardous Material/Waste Mitigation Goals Hazardous Material/Waste Goal 1: Work to ensure that emergency personnel and other potentially affected parties are informed about hazardous materials/waste located in and transported through Dakota County. Strategies: 1. Work with township,city,state,and federal agencies and private industries to share information on types and locations of hazardous wastes and contaminated sites with potential to affect the county and region. Priority: High Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Program operations Hazards: Hazmat/Hazardous Waste Funding Source: Partly Funded/Budget Lead: Dakota DCER-Waste Regulation Unit Supervisor(DCER-WRUS) 2. Support the use of the Recycling Zone to minimize the quantities of household hazardous materials/waste in the community and encourage cities to promote household hazardous waste collection. Priority: High Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Program operations Hazards: Hazmat/Hazardous Waste Funding Source: Funded/Budget Lead: DCER-WRUS 3. Provide annual training/education for hazardous waste generators on proper hazardous waste storage and disposal. Priority: Medium Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Program operations Hazards: Hazmat/Hazardous Waste Funding Source: Funded/Budget Lead: DCER-WRUS 4. Evaluate and develop capabilities to predict the direction and velocity of groundwater flow and surface runoff; integrate these results in the County GIS system;and share results with appropriate users. Priority: Medium Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Program operations Hazards: Hazmat/Hazardous Waste Funding Source: Partly Funded/Budget Lead: DCER-Groundwater Protection Prog. Supervisor As determined by the Environmental Resources Department,conduct periodic hazardous waste compliance inspections to ensure proper management,storage,and training at hazardous waste generator locations. Priority: High Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Code/ordinance enforcement Hazards: Hazmat/Hazardous Waste Funding Source: Funded/Budget Lead: DCER-WRUS Principal Contact: Dakota County Environmental Resources: Waste Regulation Unit, Environmental Initiatives, and Groundwater Protection Program supervisors.Cooperating Partners: MN Pollution Control Agency, city public safety agencies, County public safety agencies, and County GIS staff Hazardous Material/Waste Goal 2: Improve the effectiveness of policies and planning efforts addressing hazardous materials/waste. Strategies: 1. Review and update the County policies and environmental plans that address hazardous material/waste storage and transportation in Dakota County. Priority: High Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Program operations Hazards: Hazmat/Hazardous Waste Funding Source: Funded/Budget Lead: DCER-WRUS Page 134 D RAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 2. Update and distribute debris management guidelines. Priority:High Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Debris Management Plan updates Hazards: Hazmat/Hazardous Waste Funding Source: Partly Funded/Budget Lead: DCER-WRUS 3. Coordinate and facilitate discussion between the cities and the County on policies related to hazardous materials/waste storage and transportation. Priority:Medium Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Program operations Hazards: Hazmat/Hazardous Waste Funding Source: Funded/Budget Lead: DCER-WRUS 4. Design and implement hazardous material scenarios for practice exercise and to create community awareness.(consistent with National Planning Scenarios). Priority:Medium Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Exercise planning Hazards: Hazmat/Hazardous Waste Funding Source: Not Funded Lead: DCEM-RHSM 5. Encourage training to at least the Hazardous Materials Awareness and Weapons of Mass Destruction (CBRNE) level training for the ten Office of Domestic Preparedness disciplines(law enforcement,fire, EMS, dispatch, public health, health care,emergency management, public works, administration, and hazmat). Priority:Medium Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Interagency coordination Hazards: Hazmat/Hazardous Waste Funding Source: Not Funded Lead: DCEM-RHSM 6. Expand the use of mutual aid agreements and memoranda of understanding to improve response coordination between local,state,and federal agencies and appropriate private sectors. Priority:Medium Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Interagency coordination Hazards: Hazmat/Hazardous Waste Funding Source: Funded/Budget Lead: DCEM-RHSM 7. Conduct evacuation planning for townships and County facilities for hazardous material incidents. Priority:Medium Status/Completion: Periodic,as needs identified STAPLEE: Medium Implementation: Incident response planning Hazards: Hazmat/Hazardous Waste Funding Source: Not Funded Lead: DCEM-RHSM 8. Evaluate potential safety improvements for rail intersections with major highways,including deeper/wider intersections or grade separated crossings. Priority:Medium Status/Completion: Periodic, needs identified STAPLEE: Medium Implementation: Secure grant funding Hazards: Hazmat/Hazardous Waste Funding Source: Part Funded/Budget,grants Lead: DCT-CE *Reduces risk to buildings or infrastructure **Evaluates a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions;identifies which actions were selected for implementation Principal Contact: Dakota County Environmental Resources-Waste Regulation Unit Supervisor, Dakota County Emergency Management-Risk-Homeland Security Manager, Dakota County Transportation-County Engineer Cooperating Partners: Dakota County Emergency Management, MN Pollution Control Agency,city and County public safety agencies, and County GIS staff Page 135 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Structural Fire Mitigation Goals Structural Fire Goal 1: Protect structures from fire. Strategies: 1. Evaluate ordinances requiring prompt removal of snow around commercial and industrial buildings in order to ensure access for fire and other emergency equipment with cities and townships.* Priority:Medium Status/Completion: New/TBD STAPLEE: High Implementation: Ordinance enforcement Hazards: Fire Funding Source: Not Funded Lead: Dakota County Fire Chiefs 2. Work with cities and townships to identify roadways of insufficient width to handle fire trucks and establish priorities and approaches for addressing deficiencies.* Priority:Medium Implementation: Interagency coordination, STAPLEE: Medium capital improvement planning Hazards: Fire Funding Source: Not Funded Status/Completion: New/TBD Lead: Dakota County Fire Chiefs Structural Fire Goal 2: Work toward an educated and informed public on fire safety. Strategies: 1. Work through Dakota County Fire Chiefs Association and participating cities to provide education to youth on stoves,smoke detectors,fire safety,and evacuation;and homeowners on chimney inspections,electrical systems,flammable materials,heating systems,household chemicals,and evacuation.* Priority:High Implementation: Education and outreach STAPLEE: High planning, interagency coordination Hazards: Fire Funding Source: Partly Funded/Budget Status/Completion: Ongoing Lead: Dakota County Fire Chiefs *Reduces risk to buildings or infrastructure **Evaluates a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions;identifies which actions were selected for implementation Principal Contact: Dakota County Fire Chiefs Association. Cooperating Partners: Dakota County Emergency Management personnel,school systems,county news media,and non-profit organizations Terrorism Mitigation Goals Terrorism Goal 1: Reduce risk to government and publicly-owned facilities and infrastructure. Strategies: 1. Enhance public employee training on facility security awareness and incident reporting via "See Something —Say Something"Campaign. Priority:Medium Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Ongoing training, planning Hazards: Terrorism Funding Source: Funded/Budget Lead: DCEM-RHSM 2. Review BIPS 06/FEMA 426 Reference Manual recommendations to mitigate potential terrorist attacks against buildings for possible incorporation into County building design standards.Share applicable information with cities.* Priority:Medium Implementation: Capital improvement planning, STAPLEE: High interagency coordination Hazards: Terrorism Funding Source: Partly Funded/Budget,CIP Status/Completion: Ongoing Lead: DCEM-RHSM Page 136 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 3. Continue to explore different methods to share public building specifications and plans with police and fire. Priority:Medium Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Emergency response planning Hazards: Terrorism Funding Source: Funded/Budget Lead: DCEM-RHSM 4. Continue countywide exercise program to include threats presented by terrorism. Priority:High Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Exercise planning Hazards: Terrorism Funding Source: Funded/Budget Lead: DCEM-RHSM *Reduces risk to buildings or infrastructure **Evaluates a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions;identifies which actions were selected for implementation Principal Contact: Dakota County Emergency Management-Risk-Homeland Security Manager. Cooperating Partners: Dakota County Emergency Manager, Dakota County Capital Planning Department, Dakota County Facilities Management, Dakota County Sheriff's Office, public safety agencies,and critical infrastructure plant managers Terrorism Goal 2: Assure an effective and coordinated public health response to prevent and control injury,disease,and death as a result of bioterrorism. Objectives and strategies under this goal are the same as goals and objectives listed under the hazard "Infectious Diseases." The County Public Health Department is developing its infectious disease strategies under the philosophy that these strategies will be equally important whether an infectious disease occurs naturally,or a bioterrorist event occurs. Wastewater Treatment Facility Failure Mitigation Goals Wastewater facilities in Dakota County fall under the jurisdiction of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Council, the City of Hampton, or the City of Vermillion. Consequently, Dakota County does not serve as the lead agency for mitigation action involving any treatment plant. Water Supply Contamination Mitigation Goals Water Supply Goal 1: Protect the quality of Dakota County's groundwater. Strategies: 1. Regulate well construction and sealing through a permitting process that includes inspections in accordance with Dakota County Ordinance No. 114 and Minnesota Rules Chapter 4725. Priority:High Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Code/ordinance enforcement Hazards: Water Supply Contamination Funding Source: Funded/Budget Lead: DCER-GPPS 2. Provide or identify a well-testing service for private well owners. Priority:High Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Program operations Hazards: Water Supply Contamination Funding Source: Funded/Budget Lead: DCER-GPPS 3. Review well disclosure documents for the purpose of sealing wells at property sale. Priority:High Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Program operations Hazards: Water Supply Contamination Funding Source: Funded/Budget Lead: DCER-GPPS Page 137 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 4. Administer a well seal-cost share grant with the assistance of the Dakota County Community Development Agency(CDA)and administer the County Well Seal-Cost Share Grant Program. Priority:Medium Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Program operations Hazards: Water Supply Contamination Funding Source: Funded/Budget Lead: DCER-GPPS 5. Enforce private well water quality standards at the time of property sale. Priority:High Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Code/ordinance enforcement Hazards: Water Supply Contamination Funding Source: Funded/Budget Lead: DCER-GPPS 6. Enforce septic system construction standards at the time of property sale or bedroom addition in areas where the County has jurisdictional authority. Priority:High Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Code/ordinance enforcement Hazards: Water Supply Contamination Funding Source: Funded/Budget Lead: DCER-GPPS 7. Administer a septic system maintenance program requiring every system to be pumped or inspected every three years. Priority:High Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Code/ordinance enforcement Hazards: Water Supply Contamination Funding Source: Funded/Budget Lead: DCER-GPPS 8. Research methods to reduce non-point source contaminants in groundwater and surface water through outreach on agricultural Best Management Practices(BMPs)adoption and availability of financial support. Priority:High Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: Medium Implementation: Program operations Hazards: Water Supply Contamination Funding Source: Not Funded Lead: DCER-GPPS 9. Research methods to reduce non-point source contaminants in groundwater and surface waters through targeted nitrate,pesticide,and herbicide monitoring. Priority:High Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Program operations Hazards: Water Supply Contamination Funding Source: Funded/Budget Lead: DCER-GPPS 10. Educate floodplain well owners about protecting drinking water wells from flooding. Priority:Medium Status/Completion: New STAPLEE: High Implementation: Program operations Hazards: Water Supply Contamination Funding Source: Funded/Budget Lead: DCER-GPPS 11. Strategically restore drained wetlands to enhance filtration and recharge of groundwater Priority:High Status/Completion: New STAPLEE: Medium Implementation: Capital Projects Hazards: Water Supply Contamination Funding Source: Seek grant funds Lead: DCER-GPPS, DCER-Land Conservation Page 138 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 12. Partner to improve groundwater recharge by promotion and assistance of water quality improvement practices such as low impact development,wetland restoration and permanent vegetation. Priority:High Status/Completion: New STAPLEE: Medium Implementation: Capital Projects Hazards: Water Supply Contamination Funding Source: Seek grant funding Lead: DCER-GPPS, DCER-Land Conservation,SWCD 13. Use Land Conservation Focus Areas to prioritize, protect,and restore wetlands,shoreland,headwaters and significant groundwater recharge areas for water quality and supply. Priority:High Status/Completion: New STAPLEE: Medium Implementation: Program operations Hazards: Water Supply Contamination Funding Source: Seek grant funding Lead: DCER-GPPS, DCER-Land Conservation,SWCD *Reduces risk to buildings or infrastructure **Evaluates a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions;identifies which actions were selected for implementation Principal Contact: Dakota County Environmental Resources-Groundwater Protection Program Supervisor Cooperating Partners:cities,townships, Dakota County Office of Planning and Office of GIS, Dakota County SWCD, watershed management organizations, Metropolitan Council, Minnesota Department of Health,and Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Water Supply Goal 2: Protect Dakota County residents from contaminated groundwater. Strategies: 1. Identify sources for obtaining bottled water,including bottled water distributors and local grocery stores for unincorporated areas of the county. Priority:High Implementation: Emergency response planning STAPLEE: High Hazards: Water Supply Contamination Funding Source: Funded/Budget Status/Completion: Ongoing Lead: DCEM-RHSM 2. Facilitate well testing and disinfection in case of contamination. Priority:High Implementation: Program operations STAPLEE: High Hazards: Water Supply Contamination Funding Source: Funded/Budget Status/Completion: Ongoing Lead: DCER-GPPS 3. Assist cities and the State Health Department in public notification and coordination in the event of a municipal well contamination incident. Priority:High Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Program operations Hazards: Water Supply Contamination Funding Source: Funded/Budget Lead: DCER-GPPS 4. Provide well disinfection information to impacted well owners. Priority:Medium Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Program operations Hazards: Water Supply Contamination Funding Source: Funded/Budget Lead: DCER-GPPS 5. Provide education materials on monitoring private wells. Priority:Medium Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Program operations Hazards: Water Supply Contamination Funding Source: Funded/Budget Lead: DCER-GPPS Page 139 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 6. Facilitate installation of appropriate,effective drinking water treatment systems for low-income private well households with contaminated groundwater. Priority:High Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: Medium Implementation: Program operations Hazards: Water Supply Contamination Funding Source: Lead: DCER-GPPS *Reduces risk to buildings or infrastructure **Evaluates a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions;identifies which actions were selected for implementation Principal Contact: Dakota County Emergency Management, Risk-Homeland Security Manager, Dakota County Environmental Resources-Groundwater Protection. Cooperating Partners:City public works, Dakota County GIS staff, Metropolitan Council, Minnesota Department of Health,and Pollution Control Agency Water Supply Goal 3: Protect drinking water supplies. Strategies: 1. Maintain and review copies of Wellhead Protection Plans and GIS coverages of the Wellhead Protection Areas(WHPAs)and Drinking Water Supply Management Areas(DWSMAs)as they are developed by Public Water Supply Well owners and submitted to the Minnesota Department of Health. Provide comments. Priority:High Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Program operations Hazards: Water Supply Contamination Funding Source: Funded/Budget Lead: DCER-GPPS 2. Encourage and assist communities in developing groundwater protection plans. Priority:Medium Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Program operations Hazards: Water Supply Contamination Funding Source: Funded/Budget Lead: DCER-GPPS 3. Encourage cities to enhance security of their wells,reservoirs,and treatment facilities.* Priority:Medium Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Interagency planning,grants Hazards: Water Supply Contamination Funding Source: Partly Funded/Budget Lead: DCEM-RHSM 4. Conduct feasibility study for establishment of a rural water supply. Priority:Medium Status/Completion: STAPLEE: Medium Implementation: Interagency planning,grants Hazards: Water Supply Contamination Funding Source: Lead: DCER-GPPS 5. Advocate for state and federal funding for local water infrastructure improvement projects and encourage municipal projects that improve drinking water quality. Priority: High Status/Completion: New/Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Program Operations Hazards: Water Supply Contamination Funding Source: Budget Lead: TBD Principal Contact: Dakota County Environmental Resources-Groundwater Protection Program Supervisor, Dakota County Emergency Management-Risk-Homeland Security Manager. Cooperating Partners: Dakota County GIS staff, Metropolitan Council, Minnesota Department of Health,and Minnesota Pollution Control Agency,cities, townships Page 140 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Implementation Dakota County's Office of Risk Management and Homeland Security will work with municipalities and other implementation partners to identify required resources, assign specific responsibilities, and initiate work on each mitigation strategy. Work on the individual strategies will proceed according to priority ranking and available funding. Incorporation into Planning Mechanisms Where appropriate, actions will be incorporated into local zoning ordinance, emergency operation plans, and planning studies. Each participating jurisdiction followed a planning process to evaluate how best to incorporate mitigation strategies into action. Dakota County Implementation Resources The principal County program areas and positions responsible for implementing this plan's mitigation strategies will use a range of tools and processes. The following table identifies County-led programs and resources for hazards. Additional resources are in place through local, state, and federal partners. Table 6.2: Dakota County Implementation Resources Hazard Addressed Dakota County Resources • Annual Budget Process:aligns funding with operational priorities. • Capital Improvement Program: aligns funding with physical project priorities. • Emergency Operations Plan: provides an all hazard response plan for emergencies to mitigate damage that might occur during or after an event. • Dakota County Communications Center: provides communications for first responders All and public notifications through mass telephone notification system and e Integrated Public Alert and Warning System (IPAWS). • Dakota County Emergency Personnel:staff support for mitigation and response. • Training Plans:align information needs of the public and staff with training resources. • Office of Geographic Information Systems: provides map data and analysis. • Dakota County Communications: provides public communications through multiple media. • Byllesby Dam FERC Inspection: identifies concerns with physical infrastructure,operations, and emergency plans. Dam or Structural • Byllesby Dam Emergency Action Plan: mitigates loss of lives and property damage as a Failure result of dam operations. • Byllesby Security and Structural Enhancement Program:safety and security measures. • Transportation Bridge Inspection and Maintenance Program Drought • Comprehensive Water Plan • Shoreland and Floodplain Ordinance(No. 50) Flood • Flood Area Map and Controls • Hazardous Waste Ordinance(No. 111) Hazardous • Hazardous chemical data collection Materials • Nuclear Emergency Plan Exercises (Prairie Island) • Environmental Health Regulations • Infectious Disease Reporting systems • Health Alert Network • Training services for local health care providers Infectious Disease • Vaccination Program • Isolation and Quarantine Plan • Environmental Health Program Summer Storms • Severe Weather Warning System and Tornado Page 141 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Hazard Addressed Dakota County Resources • Wellhead Protection Program Water Supply • Well sealing grant and program Contamination • County Comprehensive Plan:Water Resources Section • Well and Water Supply Ordinance(No. 114) Wildfire • County land management protocols, including prescribed burns • Cyber Security Policies • Network Monitoring programs Cyber-Attack • Mobile Device Management • Staff Training • Roadway Protection Program Landslide • Trail Management Program Plan Monitoring and Evaluation Performance Measures Each Dakota County mitigation strategy includes a baseline metric for monitoring implementation progress. Dakota County's Office of Risk Management and Homeland Security will work with municipalities and implementation partners to evaluate progress on an annual basis. Coordination with the Dakota County Preparedness Committee(DPC)Agenda Mitigation action status will be a regular agenda item for the DPC. On at least an annual basis, each of the eleven member cities will be given dedicated time to update the group on strategy progress,funding status, and opportunities for cooperation. Likewise, County staff will keep the group up to date on the status of County-level strategies. Review with Responsible Departments(County Level) Although Dakota County's Office of Risk Management and Homeland Security is accountable for the implementation of County-level actions, responsibility for execution falls to other County departments (e.g., Public Health, Environmental Resources,Transportation). In order to track progress,the Office of Risk Management and Homeland Security will meet at least annually with these departments to track progress and provide assistance in overcoming implementation barriers. Plan Updates Dakota County's Risk and Homeland Security Manager has overseen periodic updates of this Plan on a five-year schedule since the initial Plan was developed in 2005. The next Plan update is anticipated for 2026-2027. The overall process involves assembling an interdisciplinary county staff team from Risk Management/Emergency Management, Sheriff's Office, Physical Development Planning, Communications, Public Health, Environmental Resources, Parks-Fleet-Facilities, and the Office of Performance Analysis. This team works with Police, Fire, and Planning staff from cities participating in the County plan and external partners to review and update hazards and strategies and engage stakeholders and the public. Section II of this Plan identifies the overall process used for the most recent plan update, which will guide the next Plan update. Continued Public Involvement Public outreach and engagement efforts will continue during the five-year effective period of this plan. Future opportunities for public involvement include: • Many capital projects, ordinance changes, and plan updates associated with the mitigation strategies require a formal adoption process, which would include the opportunity for public Page 142 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 participation. Each associated jurisdiction is responsible for providing public notice and opportunity for public comment. This applies to both County-level and city-level mitigation actions. • Continued evaluation of plan and strategy progress will be presented to the Dakota County Planning Commission (a citizen advisory committee) on a timely basis. Committee meetings follow an open- forum agenda were public input is encouraged. • Dakota County will continue to maintain an All-Hazard Mitigation Plan website, as a public information resource on individual preparedness and as a vehicle for receiving public comment: https://www.co.dakota.mn.us/HealthFamily/HandlingEmergencies/Pages/default.aspx • Concerns, opinions, and new ideas will be forwarded to Dakota County's Office of Risk Management and Homeland Security. In addition, hard copies of the plan will be made available upon request. Page 143 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Page intentionally blank. Page 144 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 SECTION VII: PARTICIPATING CITY RISKS, STRATEGIES, AND PRIORITIES Overview Cities participating in the Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Update evaluated hazards and vulnerabilities in their communities and identified strategies, priorities, and implementation resources to address vulnerabilities. Participating cities in this plan include: Apple Valley Hastings Mendota Heights Sunfish Lake Burnsville Inver Grove Miesville Vermillion Coates Heights New Trier West St. Paul Eagan Lakeville Randolph Farmington Lilydale Rosemount Hampton Mendota South St. Paul City planning efforts were guided by the Minnesota Crosswalk—Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Review Tool, prepared by the Minnesota Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, based on requirements presented in FEMA's Local Mitigation Plan Review Guide of October 1, 2011. Additional references provided to cities to assist in development of mitigation strategies include Mitigation Ideas: A Resource for Reducing Risk to Natural Hazards, published by FEMA in January 2013. The remainder of this section is presented on a city-by-city basis with the following information: 1. Hazard Identification and Risk Evaluation 2. General Land Use and Structural Inventory-Value 3. Vulnerable Populations 4. Critical Infrastructure Vulnerability 5. Changes in the City since the 2011 Dakota County Plan update 6. Critical Infrastructure Maps 7. National Floodplain Insurance Program Participation and Compliance 8. Flood-Vulnerable Structure Inventory and Value 9. Prioritized Strategies for 2022 Plan Update 10. Implementation Resources 11. Implementation progress for their strategies in the 2016 Plan, summarized in Appendix III. Cities usually assigned high, medium, or low priority ratings to their strategies based on need. Each city also used modified STAPLEE criteria to evaluate ease of implementation based on scoring each strategy against seven areas of consideration listed in Table 1. Strategies that scored higher have fewer implementation barriers. Table 7.1: Modified STAPLEE Evaluation of Strategies Modified STAPLEE Scoring: 1=does not meet criteria,2=somewhat meets criteria,or 3=meets or exceeds criteria 8. Social Impacts:community acceptance likely, benefits segment of population 9. Technical:feasible, provides long-term solution, has secondary benefits 10. Administrative:staffing and funding allocated, maintenance/operations needs can be addressed 11. Political: political support, local champion, and public support are likely 12. Legal:state and/or local authority exists, low likelihood of legal challenges 13. Economic: beneficial, affordable,contributes to economic goals,outside funding available 14. Environmental: benefits natural resources, increases safety,consistent with local and federal law Page 145 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 With a minimum possible STAPLEE score of 7 and a maximum possible score of 21, the following ranges were used to group scores: 17—21: High (easier to implement) 11— 16: Medium (moderately easy to implement) 7— 10: Low (more challenging to implement) Figure 7.1:Cities and Townships within Dakota County Lilydale� West Mendota' ! St.TailSouth` � St.Paul Mendota 5unfsh Heights Lake _ 'Inver z� Eagan Grove 61 So�ag�,i Heights Ri,y. Burnsville sa Apple Rosemount Nininger - Valley L Coates Hastings r Vermillion Lakeville Empire ``,' Mar,ha Ravenna ` a —tij a i.35.: IIIFarmington Vermillion 'r' 61, l)D. Hampton New Trier Miesville Castle Eureka Rock Hampton Douglas � Randolph Greenvale Waterford Randolph Nowh 4l 5-' II Page 146 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Table AV.1:Apple Valley Community Data Lilvd,le west �� Mendota St Paul st Pau! Population (2020): 56,374 Mendota unTsh Heights S'1' Households: 21,464 take Inver Employment/Jobs: 13,016 Grove Eagan Heights Area: 17.5 Sq. Mi. Major Land Uses: 60% Residential eumsrille 16% Parks/Rec. rivAiPIP1.1; Nininer Rosemount Two Hastings 11% Commercial & Coates l Institutional Ranna w Lakeville Empire Twp vermillion Twp Community Type: Suburban M,nh,n Twp Undeveloped Area: 4% Farmington vermillion iwp • Source: Metropolitan Council Community Profiles Hampton New Trier Miesdlle Eureka Twp Castle flock Twp Hazards of Concern Hampton Twp Douglas Twp Apple Valley staff evaluated potential hazards Randolph Twp Waterford Randolph of concern in their community, using the Dakota Greenvale Twp Twp 5Liota County Hazard Rating Model (Table AV.2) Apple Twp Valley's hazard ratings are in Table AV.3. Figure AV.1:City of Apple Valley Location Table AV.2: Dakota County Hazard Rating Model Parameter Rating=1 Rating=2 Rating=3 Rating=4 Frequency Unlikely:<1%chance in Occasional: 1 to 10% Likely:>10 to<100% Highly Likely:100% 100 years chance in next year chance in next year chance in next year Warning Time More than 12 hours 6-12 hours 3-6 hours None-minimal Extent Localized Community-wide County-wide or greater Likely Impact Negligible Limited Critical Catastrophic Table AV.3:Apple Valley Hazard Rating Hazard Frequency Warning Geographic Likely Total Time Extent Impact Cyber Threats 4 4 2 3 13 Violent Summer Storms 4 3 2 3 12 Civil Unrest 3 3 3 3 12 Extreme Heat or Cold 4 1 3 3 11 Structural Fire 4 4 1 2 11 Hazardous Material Incidents 4 4 1 2 11 Water Supply Contamination 2 4 2 3 11 Wastewater Plant Failure 2 4 2 3 11 Tornado 2 4 1 3 10 Violent Winter Storms 3 1 3 3 10 Drought 3 1 3 3 10 Terrorism 1 4 2 3 10 Flash Flood 3 3 1 2 9 Infectious Disease/Pandemic 2 1 3 3 9 Landslide 1 4 1 2 8 Overland Flood(spring snowmelt) 1 1 1 2 5 Wildfire 1 1 1 2 5 Dam Failure N/A N/A Page 147 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 General Land Use Figure AV.2 depicts general land 2020 Generalized Land Use use in Apple Valley, with Apple Valley residential (single-and multi- L 'r'■w 11111t■ i �:= '�r c.." . �:T.� family) being the predominant l-. - .. land use. , `-.'3 + ,- Structural Inventory III Value '~A '.&' i i 1 Table AV.4 provides a current *- �' ■ � � ''� total and estimated value for L '1 structures in the City of Apple .1mINIVIrik -+6 . - --dp _ r Valley. Data are from the �� I OW r � -r Dakota County s Offices of ER • Assessor Services and z 4 _ .41 Geographic Informationt* A• = �� fV1� ..1 1 Services. Structures identified � ='1 �.a as residential, commercial, �� C�lP ~ ri industrial, and agricultural have E �' _ .` re -� . , the types of structures -' „gad,@ �, 1. .:�'� �! II � Ti7), associated with those land uses. [*"� ' IL �= "Exempt" includes all buildings ' j 04 not subject to property taxes, - lir r"P` ,V,:..�'a�EMI; � ��`�'� � such as government buildings, 1 ��•-•''‘--,, oim S O i- ' schools, and places of worship. r warm Ili• _SIIL 7 R.�Y7 Al ii "Utilities" includes fixed sites APPrns tiIIPi1 1 incl=O6E1503 re i:Ps 2020 Land Use Classes ii with infrastructure for Srvy,e Emery Posdenn.f AWndmoeF Aks+denmv .teal Use ,-d,.,o-w awr d Mwo mq Fe an d J sed.Fe v�d'ec 0l ki.od.xa R...IU 5I.e..o cif n L I F,r.a,e Aril x,... electricity, sewer, and water. I ,,....•w. -kte1•ili•f M••,.P I,�•f.W -A".., =sna.Fe.,P,t.m.d , may MI n.mfk...oe.ran:e PnA aedReweeeiw ORwr ,mart "Other" includes structures that ® "� ".- i Urca i-•C .=,i 1td m. E NI.R'F°'M'"pP�'"' o""...k t =DRoe VT •6acora Q At. do not fall into preceding 1P2]F+acePata frcn al Bern NemWn.•n w.n y Ie.n P.Fo..eF Feb Gern R Cam..t,Feeeexr categories. —�udy 9p.nWry - 1�owrhp Bandana¢ —aaa -+�iMmr,_cei P.4Boiadey r6i.i.cd hv.af:i c i ry e i _ Figure AV.2:Apple Valley Land Use 2020,Metropolitan Council Table AV.4:Structural Inventory and Value,Apple Valley Land Use Land Value Building Value Total Value Structure Count Agricultural $1,090,000 $372,400 $1,462,400 10 Commercial _ $204,636,100 $275,815,500 $480,451,600 247 Exempt $165,530,100 $306,183,300 $471,713,400 406 Industrial $46,923,000 $68,566,100 $115,489,100 70 Other $3,899,300 $5,173,700 $9,073,000 9 Residential $1,471,331,700 $4,717,310,400 $6,188,627,100 1 16,196 Utilities $6,319,300 $6,260,700 $12,580,000 21 TOTAL $1,899,729,500 $5,379,682,100 $7,279,396,600 16,959 Page 148 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Vulnerability Vulnerable Populations Table AV.5 provides current estimates of populations in Apple Valley considered by FEMA to be at potentially increased risk during hazard events. Table AV.5:Apple Valley Potentially Vulnerable Populations,American Community Survey 2015-2019 Estimates Potentially Vulnerable Percentage o Apple Valley, MN— Population (%) U.S. (�) U.S. Difference Under Age 5 6.3% 6.1% 0.2% Over Age 65 14.3% 13.7% .6% Below Federal Poverty Line 5.4% 13.4% -8.0% Living with a Disability 8.4% 15.6% -7.2% Vulnerability of Critical Assets to Hazards Apple Valley staff evaluated potential vulnerabilities of critical facilities to their hazards of concern, provided in Table AV.6. These hazards were identified as having minimal or no likely impact to critical facilities: wildfire, dam failure, and landslide. Figure A.3 provides general locations for selected critical assets in Apple Valley. Table AV.6:Apple Valley Assessment of Critical Assets(Redacted in Public Version of Plan) N N T O C "OO _ - O O LL O O V a r0 LL £ i N H N c E LL of a C . o A £ ++ L £ C y N N d C y f0 16 - O X O I- O.2 LL C c0 C OJ F V 0 W ~ 3 3 g o N Changes since the 2016 Plan City staff identified no significant land use changes and additions to critical facilities since the last plan update in 2016. Page 149 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Fi:ure AV.3:Cit of A. •le Valle —Critical Facilities(Redacted in Public Version of Pia; National Flood Insurance Program Participation Table AV.7 includes information on Apple Valley's participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Additional information follows about City compliance with the terms of the NFIP. Table AV.7:Apple Valley NFIP Participation Current Effective Policies Insurance Community CID Number Map Date In-force In-force Apple Valley 270050 12/02/11 23 $5,601,000 Compliance The City of Apple Valley Code Enforcement Department monitors compliance. In addition, all building plans are ensured to be compliant with the ordinance. In 2006,the City of Apple Valley was approved for eligibility in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). The NFIP is a federal program enabling property owners in participating communities to purchase insurance protection against losses from flooding. This insurance is designed to provide an alternative to disaster assistance to meet the escalating costs of repairing damage to buildings and their contents by floods. At the time of this approval, no flood-prone areas were designated by Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA). In 2003, prior to our eligibility approval, Dakota County partnered with FEMA to complete a new county- wide floodplain study. The study was funded with more than $500,000 in federal grants, which produced new digital Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) and a flood insurance study as part of the Page 150 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 NFIP. In June 2011, FEMA approved the new FIRMs and insurance study. These changes included the identification of two areas in Apple Valley designated in zone AE,which identified as areas having a one percent chance of experiencing a flood each year.These areas include up to 42 residential properties located directly adjacent to Alimagnet and Keller lakes in the western part of the city. These properties would be required to get flood insurance only when getting a loan for insurable structures that are located within the zone. Because the new zone does not encroach beyond the minimum 75-foot building setback from the ordinary high water line, as established in the City's shoreland overlay district, it does not appear that any building construction would occur within the newly established FIRM zone. Therefore,flood insurance would likely not be mandatory. The remainder of the city is located in zone X, which is an area outside the 500-year flood, which means it has a less than 0.2 percent chance to flood annually. These areas are sometimes referred to as unmapped areas because FEMA does not provide FIRM panels for those parts of the city. Table AV.8 provides an inventory and assessed value of structures in the City of Apple Valley located within the digital flood insurance rate map (DFIRM) boundaries. Structures are listed by predominant land use categories. The table was compiled with data from the Dakota County Office of GIS and Assessor's Office. Table AV.8: Total Floodplain Structure and Value Inventory,Apple Valley Structure Type Estimated Land Value Estimated Building Value Total Value Total Structures Residential $327,200 $316,600 $643,800 1 Total $327,200 $316,600 $643,800 1 Strategy Review and Development In 2021,Apple Valley staff reviewed their strategies from the 2016 Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan for implementation progress (See Appendix III) and to identify strategies to carry forward into the 2022 Plan update as ongoing efforts or project that have not been completed. City staff considered and addressed FEMA requirements for: 1. A mitigation strategy that identifies and analyzes a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions and projects and further identifies which actions were selected for implementation 2. At least one strategy to reduce risk to buildings and infrastructure City staff also developed new strategies reflective of remaining concerns and vulnerabilities. Table AV.9 presents Apple Valley's strategies, with additional information on hazards addressed by the strategy, priority, lead implementation agency, and estimated costs. Table AV.9: Apple Valley Strategies APPLE VALLEY MITIGATION STRATEGIES,2021 1. Provide NIMS and Hazmat training to police,fire,and city department employees Priority: High Status/Completion:Ongoing STAPLEE:High Implementation:Patrol online,city EM Hazards:Multiple Representative Lead: City Emergency Management, Police Dept. Est. Cost/Funding Source:$500, local budget 2. Review COOP planning related to emergency medication dispensing planning Priority: High Lead: Police Dept.,Chief STAPLEE:High Status/Completion:Ongoing Hazards:Terrorism, Infectious Disease Implementation:City Emergency Management Est. Cost/Funding Source:none/N/A Page 151 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 3. Identify emerging and local terrorism risks/concerns through regular involvement with the FBI Joint Terrorism Executive Task Force Executive Board Priority: High Lead: Police Dept.,Chief STAPLEE:High Status/Completion:Ongoing Hazards:Terrorism Implementation:PD Est. Cost/Funding Source:none/N/A 4. Continue to construct mitigation solutions to flood-prone areas of the city to reduce or eliminate damage and improve emergency access during flooding** Priority: Med Lead: Public Works, Director STAPLEE:High Status/Completion: New/Ongoing Hazards:Flooding Implementation:Capital Improvement Program Est. Cost/Funding Source:TBD/General fund, grant 5. Continue annual infrastructure inspection/maintenance program Priority: Med Lead: Public Works, Director STAPLEE:High Status/Completion:Ongoing Hazards:Flooding,Water Supply Contamination Implementation: Est. Cost/Funding Source:$1,000,000/budget 6. Update and implement the City of Apple Valley Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) Priority: Low Lead: Police Dept.,Chief STAPLEE:Medium Status/Completion:Ongoing Hazards:Multiple Implementation: Est. Cost/Funding Source:$7,000/local budget 7. Regularly train with Apple Valley Fire Dept. relating to coordinated response to hostile event including hands on scenario-based training Priority: Low Lead: Police Dept., Fire Dept. STAPLEE:Medium Status/Completion:Ongoing Hazards:Terrorism Implementation: Est. Cost/Funding Source:$500/local budget 8. Reduce Risk to City Network Infrastructure and Software Applications Priority: Lead: City Information Technology STAPLEE: Status/Completion: New/Ongoing Hazards:Cyber-Attack Implementation: Est. Cost/Funding Source:TBD/city budget 9. Continue completing cyber security exercises as part of COOP planning Priority: Lead: City Information Technology STAPLEE: Status/Completion:New/Ongoing Hazards:Cyber-Attack Implementation: Est. Cost/Funding Source:TBD/city budget 10. Regularly develop programs and projects to identify and address cyber-security weaknesses and new threats(e.g.,USB lockdown,vendor management) Priority: Lead: City Information Technology STAPLEE: Status/Completion:New/Ongoing Hazards:Cyber-Attack Implementation: Est. Cost/Funding Source:TBD/city budget 11. Continue ongoing staff training in cyber security and new threats Priority: Lead: City Information Technology STAPLEE: Status/Completion:New/Ongoing Hazards:Cyber-Attack Implementation: Est. Cost/Funding Source:TBD/city budget Page 152 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 12. Invest in hardware and IT infrastructure improvements(e.g.,encrypted storage) Priority: Lead: City Information Technology STAPLEE: Status/Completion:New/Ongoing Hazards:Cyber-Attack Implementation: Est. Cost/Funding Source:TBD/city budget 13. Periodically review best practices through the IT Advisory Team Priority: Lead: City Information Technology STAPLEE: Status/Completion:New/Ongoing Hazards:Cyber-Attack Implementation: Est. Cost/Funding Source:TBD/city budget *Reduces risk to buildings or infrastructure **Evaluates comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions/projects;identifies which were selected for implementation Implementation Resources Table AV.10 identifies Apple Valley staff resources and their roles in implementing its mitigation strategies. Table AV.10:Apple Valley Mitigation Implementation Resources Department, General Role Processes and Tool for Implementing Responsible Position Mitigation Strategies Building Inspections, Building inspections, regulation of Enforce safety restrictions including setbacks, City Building Inspector new housing development building materials,spacing, and location to hydrants in new construction areas Planning and Zoning, Zoning,development siting,and Enforce floodplain ordinances and compliance, Planning Director restrictions, Comprehensive Plans proper land use per ordinances Police, Police Chief Public safety and law enforcement, Emergency response, incident command emergency response training,training for public safety,city,schools, and businesses Public Works,Public Development and operations of City well inspections and maintenance,24-7 Works Director public infrastructure(roads, callout availability, partnership with all city utilities) departments Fire Department, Fire Public and fire safety enforcement, Inspect commercial buildings for code Chief emergency response compliance, input into building phase of new construction,training with police on coordinated response Information City IT infrastructure management Up to date and active IT asset monitoring, Technology: IT Director Firewall update and maintenance, Fiber expansion, Intrusion testing Table AV.11 identifies Apple Valley's implementation resources related to processes and ordinances. Table AV.11:Apple Valley Additional Implementation Resources Program/Ordinance/Study/Technical Adopted or Method of incorporation into the hazard mitigation Document Revised plan Surface Water Management Plan 2018 Planning document for local drainage system Capital Improvement Program 2021 Infrastructure upgrades to support hazard mitigation 2021 Allocates annual operational funding for departments Annual Budget and staff implementing the City's mitigation strategies NIMS Compliance Continued education for new and existing employees Page 153 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 CITY OF BURNSVILLE Table B.1: Burnsville Community Data L l Oaf e wen south Mendota St Paul St peal Population (2020): 64,317 Mendota Heights Sunfish Households: 25,480 Lake Inver Employment/Jobs: 29,675 Grove Eagan Heights Area: 27.0 Sq. Mi. Major Land Uses: 41% Residential Burnsville apple 19% Parks/Rec. Valley Rosemount Nlninger Twp Hastings 10% Commercial & cnatef _ Institutional Ravenna Lakeville , Empire Twi Vermillion TwP 10% Industrial- MarshanTwp Community Type: Suburban I Farmington Vesmillion Twp Undeveloped Area: 7% Hainpton New Trier Mlesville Source:Metropolitan Council Community Profiles Eureka Twp Castle Rack Twp Hampton Twp Douglas Twp Hazards of Concern ate�o.v Randolph Twg Burnsville staff evaluated potential hazards Greenvale TwpP Scioto T`e using the Dakota County rating model (Table p Tr`'"" ;:,:,.i....wi M.F�:",r'' n na...r o Wlgp B.2) Burnsville's hazard ratings are in Table B.3. '" "" `'° "�ry Figure B.1:City of Burnsville Location Table B.2: Dakota County Hazard Rating Model Parameter Rating=1 Rating=2 Rating=3 Rating=4 Frequency Unlikely:<1%chance Occasional: 1 to 10% Likely:>10 to<100% Highly Likely:100% in 100 years chance in next year chance in next year chance in next year Warning Time More than 12 hours 6-12 hours 3-6 hours None-minimal Extent Localized Community-wide County-wide or greater Likely Impact Negligible Limited Critical Catastrophic Table B.3: Burnsville Hazard Rating Hazard Frequency Warning Extent Impact Total Tornado 2 3 3 4 13 Violent Summer Storms (e.g.,wind,hail) 3 3 2 3 11 Terrorism 1 4 2 4 11 Flash Flood 3 3 1 3 10 Structural Fire 4 4 1 1 10 Hazardous Material Incidents 4 4 1 1 10 Civil Unrest 3 4 1 2 10 Violent Winter Storms 3 1 3 2 9 Overland Flood(spring snowmelt) 2 1 3 3 9 Drought 2 1 3 3 9 Extreme Heat or Cold 3 1 3 2 9 Landslide 2 3 1 2 8 Water Supply Contamination 1 2 2 3 8 Wastewater Treatment Plant Failure 1 2 2 3 8 Cyber Threats 2 4 1 1 8 Wildfire 2 2 1 2 7 Infectious Disease Outbreak/Pandemic 2 1 3 1 7 Dam Failure 1 2 1 3 7 Page 154 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 General Land Use Figure B.2 depicts general land 2020 Generalized Land Use use in Burnsville, with Burnsville residential (single-and multi- ,,� ,.�„�, _ family) beingthepredominant :�, ii i°I� I� 1Mil;�JY ' � 97403. Il I � 'III iIII��A;lll � • � land use. PNfJ 'a IIII}1. liYENIU�-FIY� i Structural InventoryS�'�.:_>. YIII�� .;. Valuea..7'7, ;OM r • wpr,L I o_I W1111 1 .YZ r r---- A r ' Table B.4 provides a current .raL. ,:T- _� J•t50--•'.E --( - .---`'' idai. , . total and estimated value for , -• A s 9 • rr structures in the City of ) „� ; � �; . Burnsville. Data are from the I '�'��- ias — ,-1 ,-�' t y '- =;y' Dakota County's Offices of �yr k� �rz'1 ` Assessor Services and ; s . ippo ' ' Geographic Information •,, 2 ,�i rn �� ,� L ,� , , Services. Structures identified '• %,1 94`6' It'.;? as residential, commercial, _ {„ ■ aA industrial, and agricultural have 4;.4, �,`=��•� � 4 I` "" the types of structures Tirt-61: J �•k - r, 1_I •' 4� _'Ash-� associated with those land uses. '� t�k- r3 �'' III ' 'r. r4i.re" 'Z -. mIa� It. cis�11� �I "Exempt" includes all buildings ,�W.� _61, t 117ij "-� , ;F " not subject to property taxes, � �,,�,ilaili, , a� ;;;ee I: Ifs ti, 6 _IF such as government buildings, �4. �' schools, and places of worship. N :.■ ; ' ... r r u.-ill:+Ld__ i.= . II aF,,as ralely. 1 frf•1 111742 mien "Utilities" includes fixed sites 2020 Land Use Classes Al with infrastructure for .;-"'"'�"°"`"' I ®n ro,o :..,, ii ` .�. � °""""ti.., MI.., IM electricity, sewer, and water. I—I`-4'.""" "' c�.y A• ,I,n"'mn,.' Rat.aneR.wv�wi oti MIN1 le S.n:''.-r.,�!nn..e II,..R m.edwaw 'ra.. M_...e,, . "Other" includes structures that o�� _.'�.. o, do not fall into preceding �.., LS Cou T .d., — Cy �r�myip gru,dane -Rn a Rawa ,ar FestaBwndoy xETO NOT RNcategories. Figure B.2:Burnsville Land Use 2020,Metropolitan Council Table B.4:Structural Inventory and Value,Burnsville Land Use Land Value Building Value Total Value Structure Count Commercial $299,029,500 $522,243,900 $821,273,400 514 Exempt $150,445,400 $277,201,100 $427,646,500 339 Industrial $190,123,400 $482,595,800 $672,719,200 387 Other $1,056,900 $4,982,200 $6,039,100 7 1 Residential $1,443,521,700 $4,781,152,500 $6,224,674,200 17,428 Utilities $21,322,400 $151,674,796 $172,997,204 188 TOTAL $2,105,499,300 $6,219,850,296 $8,325,349,604 18,863 Page 155 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Vulnerability Vulnerable Populations Table B.5 provides current estimates of populations in Burnsville considered by FEMA to be at potentially increased risk during hazard events. Table B.5: Burnsville Potentially Vulnerable Populations,American Community Survey 2015-2019 Estimates Potentially Vulnerable Burnsville, MN— Population Percentage(%) U.S. (%) U.S. Difference Under Age 5 6.9% 6.1% 0.8% Over Age 65 15.4% 13.7% 1.7% Below Federal Poverty Line 7.6% 13.4% -5.8% Living with a Disability 10.3% 15.6% -5.3% Vulnerability of Critical Assets to Hazards Burnsville staff evaluated potential vulnerabilities of critical facilities to their hazards of concern, provided in Table B.6. Figure B.3 provides general locations for selected critical assets in Burnsville. Table B.6: Burnsville Assessment of Critical Assets(Redacted in Public Version of Plan) D E 8 0 O N 3 H V C p LL E Ncr.: N .i E t v1 £ = 2 7 -o C N u. E E _ ;, 3 v, 3 v 3 v O> v X u w Changes since the 2011 Plan Burnsville staff identified use changes and additions to critical facilities since the plan update in 2016: 1. New Fire Station 1 will be completed in October 2021, old Fire Station 1 will be decommissioned and demolished. Page 156 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Fi:ure B.3:Cit of Burnsville—Critical Facilities(Redacted in Public Version of Plan) National Flood Insurance Program Participation and Compliance Table B.7 includes information on Burnsville's participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Additional information follows about City compliance with the terms of the NFIP. Table B.7: Burnsville NFIP Participation Current Effective Policies Insurance Community CID Number Map Date In-force In-force Burnsville 270102 12/02/2011 29 $9,625,600 Compliance: City of Burnsville Floodplain Regulations (City Code Chapter 10), Ordinance 1250 (October 8, 2011), and the Burnsville Official Zoning Map together govern allowable uses in the floodway, flood fringe, and general floodplain districts. The City Planner administers and enforces the terms of this ordinance. Violations of the City Code Floodplain Chapter constitute a misdemeanor subject to prosecution. Table B.8 provides an inventory and assessed value of structures in the City of Burnsville located within the digital flood insurance rate map (DFIRM) boundaries. Structures are listed by predominant land use categories. The table was compiled with data from the Dakota County Office of GIS and Assessor's Office. Page 157 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Page 158 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Table B.8: Total Floodplain Structure and Value Inventory,Burnsville Structure Type Estimated Land Value Estimated Building Value Total Value Total Structures Exempt $23,900 $0 $23,900 12 Industrial $7,360,500 $2,251,400 $9,611,900 14 Residential $22,874,400 $4,898,800 $27,773,200 35 Utilities $9,647,900 $133,703,696 $143,351,604 116 Total $39,906,700 $140,853,896 $180,760,604 177 Strategy Review and Development In 2021, Burnsville staff reviewed their strategies from the 2016 Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan for implementation progress(See Appendix III) and to identify strategies to carry forward into the 2022 Plan update as ongoing efforts or project that have not been completed. City staff considered and addressed FEMA requirements for: 1. A mitigation strategy that identifies and analyzes a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions and projects and further identifies which actions were selected for implementation 2. At least one strategy to reduce risk to buildings and infrastructure City staff also developed new strategies reflective of remaining concerns and vulnerabilities. Table B.9 lists Burnsville's strategies,with additional information on hazards addressed by the strategy, priority, lead implementation agency, and estimated costs. Table B.9: Burnsville All-Hazard Mitigation Plan Strategies BURNSVILLE MITIGATION STRATEGIES,2016 1. Enhance Information Technology/Fiber Optic Security Priority: High Status/Completion: Existing/complete updates STAPLEE: High Implementation: CDAJPA Broadband Assets Hazards:Water Supply Contamination,Tornado, Inventory;COB Fiber Vault condition review Terrorism project Lead: COB Est. Cost/Funding Source: $20,000/Water, Sewer, IT Enterprise funds 2. Replace aging sewer lines* Priority: High Lead: City Engineer STAPLEE: High Status/Completion: Ongoing Hazards: Flash Flood, Backups Implementation: Capital Improvement Plan Est. Cost/Funding Source: Varies/ CIP Funds 3. Establish a process to increase monitoring-patrol of identified MANPADS sites Priority: Low Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Emergency Operations Planning Hazards: Terrorism (EOP) Lead: Police Dept.,Chief Est. Cost/Funding Source: Staff time/Budget 4. Continue Emergency Siren Maintenance Plan Priority: Med Lead: Emergency Management Coordinator STAPLEE: High Status/Completion: Existing/by Summer 2016 Hazards: Natural Disasters,Weather Events Implementation: EOP Est. Cost/Funding Source: $8,000 yearly/Budget 5. Maintain Active List of All 302 Facilities Priority: High Lead: Emergency Management Coordinator STAPLEE: High Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing Hazards: Hazardous Materials,Weather Events Implementation: EOP Est. Cost/Funding Source: Staff time/Budget Page 159 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 6. Conduct EOC Drill Annually Priority: Med Lead: Emergency Management Coordinator STAPLEE: High Status/Completion:Existing/each October Hazards: All Implementation: EOP Est. Cost/Funding Source: Staff time/Budget 7. Continue NIMS Training for City Staff Priority: Low Lead: Emerg. Mgmt. Coordinator, Police Chief STAPLEE: High Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing Hazards:Multiple Implementation: EOP Est. Cost/Funding Source: Staff time/Budget 8. Complete Sunset Dam EAP Update*** Priority: High Lead: Public Works Director STAPLEE: High Status/Completion: Complete/Ongoing updates Hazards: Flooding Implementation: Dam EAP Est. Cost/Funding Source: $20,000/Stormwater Fund 9. Continue Fire Prevention Programs Priority: Low Lead: Fire Chief STAPLEE: High Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing Hazards: Structural Fire Implementation: Fire Prevention Programs Est. Cost/Funding Source: $5,000/Budget *Reduces risk to buildings or infrastructure ** Evaluates comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions/projects;identifies which were selected for implementation ***The City of Burnsville does not intend to pursue FEMA HHPD grant funds during this five-year planning cycle. Implementation Resources Table B.10 identifies Burnsville staff roles in implementing mitigation strategies. Table B.10: Burnsville Staff Implementation Resources Department,Responsible General Role Processes and Tool for Implementing Position Mitigation Strategies Building Inspections, City Building inspections, regulation Enforce current codes related to building and Building Inspector of new housing development property maintenance Planning and Zoning, Zoning, development siting and Follow the Floodplain Regulations set forth in Planning Director restrictions,Comprehensive City code Plans Police, Police Chief Public safety and law Provide response training to all current and new enforcement,emergency employees through annual training and Field response Training processes;Community outreach programs through the community resource division, Blue in the School program, and other committees Public Works,Public Works Development and operations of Follow the replacement schedule for Director public infrastructure(roads, infrastructure and capital improvement plans utilities) Fire Department, Fire Chief Public and fire safety Inspect commercial buildings, Plan review, CERT enforcement,emergency training for community, Public Education, response community engagement through various committees and partnerships Page 160 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Table B.11 identifies Burnsville's policy and technical resources for implementing mitigation strategies. Table B.11: Burnsville Technical Implementation Resources Burnsville Method of incorporation into the Program/Policy/Technical Year adopted/revised Documents hazard mitigation plan Emergency Operations Plan 07-2021 City wide for Emergency Operations BPD Policy Manual 2021-Ongoing Directs PD staff at emergency incidents BFD Policy Manual 2021-Ongoing Directs FD staff at emergency incidents Water Resource Management 05-20-02;09-02-08 Updated;06-03-14 Used for Evaluating storm water issues Plan Updated; 11-02-15 Authorized update and CIP improvements NPDES Permit 04-07-15 Policy Adopted, Annual-2016 Managing City storm water facilities 2040 Comprehensive Plan 2019 Directs future development/operations Uniform Building/Fire Codes Building:03-31/20 rewritten Standards for new construction and Fire:02-04-80, many amendments remodeling Zoning Ordinance 2021 Flood related building standards Water Supply Plan 04-10-17 Has Emergency Action Plan Public Safety Mutual Aid Guides neighboring cities in providing Multiple documents and updates public safety assistance to each other Documents during emergencies Public Works Mutual Aid Guides neighboring cities in providing Multiple documents and updates public works assistance to each other Document during emergencies Page 161 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 CITY OF COATES Table C.1:Coates Community Data Population (2020): 147 Liiydaie i,t,,a# Households: 62 Mendota St Paul South tPit Mendota . Sunfi Heights th Employment/Jobs: 295 Inver Area: 1.4 Sq. Mi. Grove Major Land Uses: 76% Ag./U ndevel. Eagan Heights 6% Industrial Rurnwil Ee 5% Residential Apple Rosemount Nlninger Valley Twp Hastings Community Type: Diversified Rural Undeveloped Area: 76% Ravenna Source:Metropolitan Council Community Profiles Lakruille Empire Twp Vermillion Marsha,rwp Twp Farmington Vermillion Twp Hazards of Concern Hampton New Frier Mlesville Coates staff evaluated potential hazards of tu reka Twp Castle Rock Twp Hampton Twp peuglas Twp concern in their community, using the same rating model used by Dakota County and other HandoIph Twp Waterford Randolph participating cities. Greenvale Twp Twp Seiota Twp C,,.In.r.6rrn. V 1, ."."" 7. dC ..per.., M,!tflI!S tmtr NW q0 Mnm orrwwc o.A Oa...;[w np miry e4 Figure C.1:City of Coates Location Table C.2: Dakota County Hazard Rating Model Parameter Rating=1 Rating=2 Rating=3 Rating=4 Frequency Unlikely:<1%chance in Occasional: 1 to 10% Likely:>10 to<100% Highly Likely: 100% 100 years chance in next year chance in next year chance in next year Warning Time More than 12 hours 6-12 hours 3-6 hours None-minimal Extent Localized Community-wide County-wide or greater Likely Impact Negligible Limited Critical Catastrophic Table C.3:Coates Hazard Rating Hazard Frequency Warning Geographic Likely Total Time Extent Impact Terrorism 1 4 3 4 12 Tornado 2 1 2 4 9 Structural Fire 2 4 1 2 9 Hazardous/Nuclear Material Incidents 1 4 1 3 9 Wildfire 1 2 3 3 9 Summer Storms 2 1 2 3 8 Winter Storms 2 1 2 3 8 Infectious Disease 1 1 2 3 7 Extreme Heat 1 1 3 2 7 Extreme Cold 1 1 3 2 7 Drought 1 1 2 2 6 Flash Flood N/A N/A N/A N/A Water Supply Contamination, including N/A N/A N/A N/A WWTP Failure _ _ Overland Flood N/A — N/A _ N/A N/A Dam Failure N/A _ N/A _ N/A N/A Landslide N/A N/A N/A N/A Cyber Security Page 162 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 General Land Use Figure C.2 depicts general land 2020 Generalized Land Use use in Coates, with agriculture Coates being the predominant land use. Structural Inventory •-. - -- - -, 111 Value { Table C.4 provides a current '- total and estimated value for structures in the City of Coates. i Data are from the Dakota County's Offices of Assessor _. IN Services and Geographic •'� :4` Information Services. • i Structures identified as �' residential, commercial, industrial, and agricultural have j the types of structures !. - associated with those land uses. ! _"- --- J^^ J _ "Exempt" includes all buildings '--, ri not subject to property taxes, such as government buildings, schools, and places of worship. "Utilities" includes fixed sites ! \ l with infrastructure for Appre,,,.., , ,,nm-a.z,o,m.0. 2020 Land Use Classes II electricity, sewer, and water. s F,�,YR.,,��, ,R�1�7 ,6 ,,..a ��• -F..,, swF,..,�,,. rim M..dU_Ra .I I.,:.-,.....UI, - "Other" includes structures that .p" -M41�,. PM 1. ,mi„-" -r.'M., -.I,I a rr A1.1 U U%.C ci Pak end dh Amt.. e, =.^n, do not fall into preceding v - >, ' - Pa;;.Ymmeme, .a.. ■e P Ra: ..,,'" o � e categories. na•. rA .. ..,..,..,. :a oaa "=:; `� ' A� . 2l5.+e,wre...� .:.... - .nr.FmlnAAK litlk C hnt Bo,1 I — C y r1 TownsNO 9wn rioc —Roads ry ��R MR ocYr:mi Pa,c�l BounCaiY l[a ,rx-o ..,� epiimm METROPOLITAN Figure C.2:Coates Land Use 2020,Metropolitan Council Table C.4:Structural Inventory and Value,Coates Use Type Land Value Structural Value Total Value Number of Structures Agricultural $5,500,800 $430,700 $5,931,500 6 Commercial $1,498,800 $2,268,500 $3,767,300 25 Exempt $533,200 $204,500 $737,700 2 Industrial $1,472,800 $3,725,800 $5,198,600 _ 8 Other $61,500 $0 $61,500 _ 2 Residential $2,972,400 $8,666,100 $11,638,500 106 TOTAL $12,039,500 $15,295,600 $27,335,100 149 Page 163 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Vulnerability Vulnerable Populations Table C.5 provides current estimates of populations in Coates considered by FEMA to be at potentially increased risk during hazard events. Table C.5:Coates Potentially Vulnerable Populations,American Community Survey 2015-2019 Estimates Potentially Vulnerable Percentage o Coates, MN— Population (%) U.S. (�) U.S. Difference Under Age 5 4.6% 6.1% -1.5% Over Age 65 17.1% 13.7% 3.4% Below Federal Poverty Line 8.7% 13.4% -4.7% Living with a Disability 10.5% 15.6% -5.1% Vulnerability of Critical Assets to Hazards Coates staff evaluated potential vulnerabilities of critical facilities to their hazards of concern, provided in Table C.6. Figure C.3 provides general locations for selected critical assets in Coates. Table C.6:Assessment of Critical Assets(Redacted in Public Version of the Plan) 0 c V N U.i1 C fN0 •£ o Q N '6 >: N f0 f0 0 o 'a 0 O • . C 0 E i L E E,Critical - 'a' u. ,; 8 o 3 E Facilities E `E C� N a`, 'o > — 2 E • ~ VI al LL _ U 0. r N 1} 3 N alH O XW Changes since the 2016 Plan City staff identified no significant land use changes or additions to critical facilities since the last plan update in 2016. Page 164 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Figure C.3:City of Coates—Critical Facilities(Redacted in Public Version of Plan) National Flood Insurance Program Participation and Compliance The City of Coates does not participate in the NFIP and has no structures identified to be within the digital flood insurance rate map (DFIRM) boundaries. Strategy Review and Development In 2021, Coates staff reviewed strategies from the 2016 Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan for implementation progress (See Appendix III) and to identify strategies to carry forward into the 2022 Plan update as ongoing efforts or project that have not been completed. City staff considered and addressed FEMA requirements for: 1. A mitigation strategy that identifies and analyzes a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions and projects and further identifies which actions were selected for implementation 2. At least one strategy to reduce risk to buildings and infrastructure City staff also developed new strategies reflective of remaining concerns and vulnerabilities. Table C.7 presents Coates's strategies, with additional information on hazards addressed by the strategy, priority, lead implementation agency, and estimated costs. Page 165 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Table C.7:Coates All-Hazard Mitigation Plan Strategies COATES MITIGATION STRATEGIES,2016 1. Maintain warning sirens* Priority: High (16) Status/Completion: Existing/ongoing Hazards:Violent Storms,Tornado Implementation: Yearly inspections Lead: City Administration Est. Cost/Funding Source: $1,000/City budget 2. Grade roads to repair damage from flash floods* Priority: High (16) Status/Completion: Existing/ongoing Hazards: Flash Flood Implementation: As needed Lead: Street Department, Est. Cost/Funding Source: $1,000/ City budget *Reduces risk to buildings or infrastructure **Evaluated a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions; identifies which actions were selected for implementation Implementation Resources Table C.8 identifies Coates staff resources and roles in implementing its mitigation strategies.Table C.9 identifies implementation resources related to processes and ordinances. Table C.8:Coates Staff Implementation Resources Department,Responsible Position General Role Processes and Tool for Implementing Mitigation Strategies Building Inspections, Building inspections,regulation of new e.g.,enforce safety restrictions including contracted housing development setbacks,building materials and fire suppression systems Planning and Zoning,contracted Zoning,development siting and restrictions, e.g.,floodplain ordinances and compliance Comprehensive Plans Police, Public safety and law enforcement, e.g.,city well inspection and maintenance Dakota County Sheriff emergency response Table C.9:Coates Additional Implementation Resources Program/Ordinance/Study/Technical Adopted or I Method of incorporation into the hazard mitigation plan Document Revised • Page 166 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 CITY OF EAGAN Table E.1: Eagan Community Data LFlydaie west uth Population (2020): 68,855 Mendota 5'Paul StPa I Mendota Sunfish Households: 27,609 Hei"Ti ke Employment/Jobs: 51,341 Inver Grove Area: 33.5 Sq. Mi. Eagan Heights Major Land Uses: 41% Residential 19% Parks/Rec. a"`°'"'°e Apple Rosemount Nlninger 9% Undeveloped Valley Twp Hastings Coates 7% Industrial Ravenna Lakeritle Empire Twp Vermillion Community Type: Suburban Marsha nTwp Twp Undeveloped 9D� farm;n�ton Verrnitlion Two 0 Area: Hampton New Trier Source: Metropolitan Council Community Profiles Mies"`'"e Eureka Twp Castle Rock Twp Hampton Twp Douglas Twp Hazards of Concern Randolph Twp Eagan staff evaluated potential hazards of Waterford Randolph vTwp Scioto concern in their community, usingthe same Green Twp �rF.P.W.0Na•W..,WU rating model used by Dakota County and other .._,..,. . „:p: ,....__ participating cities. Figure E.1:City of Eagan Location Table E.2: Dakota County Hazard Rating Model Parameter Rating=1 Rating=2 Rating=3 Rating=4 Frequency Unlikely:<1%chance Occasional: 1 to 10% Likely:>10 to<100% Highly Likely:100% in 100 years chance in next year chance in next year chance in next year Warning Time More than 12 hours 6-12 hours 3-6 hours None-minimal Extent Localized Community-wide County-wide or greater Likely Impact Negligible Limited Critical Catastrophic Table E.3: Eagan Hazard Rating Hazard Frequency Warning Geographic Likely Total Time Extent Impact Violent Summer Storms (e.g., wind, hail) 4 2 2 3 11 Structural Fire 4 4 1 2 11 Cyber Threats 4 4 1 2 11 Tornado 3 3 1 3 10 Violent Winter Storms 4 1 3 2 10 Hazardous Material Incidents 3 4 1 2 10 Terrorism 1 4 2 3 10 Flash Flood 3 2 1 3 9 Infectious Disease Outbreak/Pandemic 2 1 3 3 9 Water Supply Contamination 1 3 2 3 9 Wastewater Treatment Plant Failure 1 2 3 3 9 Civil Unrest 2 4 1 2 9 Drought 3 1 2 2 8 Extreme Heat or Cold 4 1 2 1 8 Overland Flood (spring snowmelt) 3 1 1 2 7 Wildfire 2 3 1 1 7 Landslide 1 3 1 1 6 Dam Failure NA NA NA NA NA Page 167 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 General Land Use Figure E.2 depicts general land 2020 Generalized Land Use use in Eagan, with residential Eagan (single and multi family) being I , '"""F Uui P I r'�_ ` a� the predominant land use. Y �' ...4 -ri■ e.w4r, i Structural Inventory ,a . Value NI /LE:- 11 e 1 . Table E.4 provides a current I ■� ' total and estimated value for .1� 1/ u rld structures in the City of Eagan. 1 %% Data are from the Dakota _ .,. ...�1 _ ., ,. , ii, ., County's Offices of AssessorAAA -' ,Eim 1;ui Services and Geographic ]'' .;. I` Information Services. ,1 g�� til, _ I•. Structures identified as �� t�� E residential, commercial, filgtanlitwilvir � '} industrial, and agricultural have j ,� � �� _. r ' ' the types of structures F � e r �� ''�`-' rl maw 1 associated with those land uses. i- „�q, C ±z � ` , ' Exempt includes all buildings -I. -- 1._ not subject to property taxes, ; j' 1Lr -1'_7 III such as government buildings, » schools, and places of worship. `-:I . , + N.,., ,- i# Utilities includes fixed sites uI with infrastructure for Apprarlrnrery 1 WO=u.8fx7c6 melee 2020 Land Use Classes I. electricity, sewer, and water. �.dR, ' N ., , e > b ,� .,�.� ,,., .,., .' J,S.ekF..,1,.M,._!.J i� :L=R. -1e .,..,.., , [�.,r,.,., tZ N.p -, "Other" includes structures that sln•or•=,r, M N-1„-r. .ri..rus.rda:. ...,>tt.o .Rall., 'AI sr�aKF.,,y U& J rwsR,enrer .rA.,n'aw•,..w seer R+d Reereetlen weer r"'w" do not fall into preceding ram,N,..A M -�,.: rF.�:s�.,__,.,.,., ,>,er .,t.„._. ,.o ,,. . categories. I'M cwrrty euMery -Diq�arAT nc 5w•idei Ko —Roe M tF fml wy L§rcW 9ountlery46 trrg -.rpi:T' ....,�, xi _•x .,xu —Ape:! METROPOLITAN Figure E.2: Eagan Land Use 2020, Metropolitan Council Table E.4:Structural Inventory and Value,Eagan Use Type Land Value Structural Value Total Value Number of Structures Agricultural $11,899,500 $53,500 $11,953,000 9 Commercial $475,186,100 $874,010,604 $1,349,196,700 _ 516 Exempt $447,957,600 $372,782,000 $820,739,600 416 Industrial $305,861,600 $669,709,100 $975,570,700 400 Other $1,104,700 $2,489,300 $3,594,000 10 Residential $1,924,188,300 $6,388,040,300 $8,312,228,600 19,738 Utilities $4,732,400 $11,817,100 $16,549,500 38 TOTAL $3,170,930,200 $8,318,901,904 $11,489,832,100 21,127 Page 168 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Vulnerability Vulnerable Populations Table E.5 provides current estimates of populations in Eagan considered by FEMA to be at potentially increased risk during hazard events. Table E.5: Eagan Potentially Vulnerable Populations,American Community Survey 2015-2019 Estimates Potentially Vulnerable Percentage(%) U.S. (%) Eagan, MN— Population U.S. Difference Under Age 5 6.1% 6.1% 0.0% Over Age 65 12.1% 13.7% -1.6% Below Federal Poverty Line 5.6% 13.4% -7.8% Living with a Disability 7.8% 15.6% -7.8% Vulnerability of Critical Assets to Hazards Eagan staff evaluated potential vulnerabilities of critical facilities to their hazards of concern, provided in Table E.6. City staff identified dam failure as not relevant to critical facilities. Figure 3 provides general locations for selected critical assets in Eagan. Table E.6: Eagan Assessment of Critical Assets(Redacted in Public Version of Plan) c 0 Y 03 4_ N N -0 fA £ v w v E af.. E o N £ , N ((13 i C O p C LL £ i i L .a :i Critical Facilities a :_ a7 c a 3 c e = ms o a, -0 a E 8 i m a v > 3 o aEi m 2 N N E LL a a, r u > _ L J _ . {A O W U — d Y g Changes since the 2016 Plan Eagan staff identified use changes and additions to critical facilities since the plan update in 2016: There has been no new development in hazard prone areas. Development continues in the Viking Lakes area which is bringing more people into the NE corner of the city. Page 169 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Figure E.3:City of Eagan—Critical Facilities(Redacted in Public Version of Plan) National Flood Insurance Program Participation and Compliance Table E.7 includes information on Eagan's participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Additional information follows about City compliance with the terms of the NFIP. Table E.7: Eagan NFIP Participation Current Effective Policies Insurance Community CID Number Map Date In-force In-force Eagan 270103 12/2/11 39 $11,021,600 Compliance: Compliance is ensured through use of the City's official flood zoning map and enforcement of City Ordinances related to floodplain zones, allowed/prohibited uses, standards, addressing violations, plan review, and inspections. Table E.8 provides an inventory and assessed value of structures in Eagan located within the digital flood insurance rate map (DFIRM) boundaries. Structures are listed by predominant land use categories. The table was compiled with data from the Dakota County Office of GIS and Assessor's Office. Page 170 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Table E.8: Total Floodplain Structure and Value Inventory,Eagan Structure Type Estimated Land Value Estimated Building Value Total Value Total Structures Exempt $10,853,200 $23,133,500 $33,986,700 11 Total $10,853,200 $23,133,500 $33,986,700 11 Strategy Review and Development In 2021, Eagan staff reviewed their strategies from the 2016 Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan for implementation progress (See Appendix III) and to identify strategies to carry forward into the 2022 Plan update as ongoing efforts or project that have not been completed. City staff considered and addressed FEMA requirements for: 1. A mitigation strategy that identifies and analyzes a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions and projects and further identifies which actions were selected for implementation 2. At least one strategy to reduce risk to buildings and infrastructure City staff also developed new strategies reflective of remaining concerns and vulnerabilities. Table E.9 lists Eagan's strategies,with additional information on hazards addressed by the strategy, priority, lead implementation agency, and estimated costs. Table E.9: Eagan All-Hazard Mitigation Plan Strategies EAGAN MITIGATION STRATEGIES,2021 1. Address security needs for ongoing newly identified threats. Priority: High Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing Hazards: Cyber Security Implementation: Risk and Information Security Lead: IT Department, IT Network Supervisor Committee(RISC) Est. Cost/Funding Source: Staff time/Budget 2. Continue storm water pond expansion and maintenance. Priority: High Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing Hazards: Flash Flood Implementation: Capital Improvement Program Lead: Public Works, City Engineer Est. Cost/Funding Source: $250,000 annually/ Local,with County,State,or federal 3. Adopt the most recent Minnesota Fire Code(2020).* Priority: Med Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing Hazards: Structural Fire Implementation: City Council Adoption Lead: Fire Department, Fire Marshal Est. Cost/Funding Source: Staff Time/City Budget 4. Conduct Internal and/or External Network Information Security Assessments and Penetration Tests. Priority: Med Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing Hazards: Cyber Security Implementation: RISC Lead: IT Department, IT Network Supervisor Est. Cost/Funding Source: $8-16K(assess), $20K (tests)/Local, possible State,or federal 5. Update Building Code with most recent State code changes. Priority: Med Status/Completion: Existing/Every three years Hazards: Summer Storms,Structural Fire Implementation: Local Building Code Lead: Community Development, Chief Building Est. Cost/Funding Source: Staff Time/Budget Official Page 171 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 6. Continue regular planning meetings with City Staff and NFL franchise. Priority: Med Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing Hazards: Summer Storms,Structural Fire, Implementation: Cooperative planning: Extreme Heat Community Development, Engineering, Police, Lead: Lead Dept.to vary as development and and Fire tenancy progress; responsible position will be Est. Cost/Funding Source: Staff Time/Budget head planner 7. Train new staff from multiple departments in the proper reporting and response to illicit discharges to storm sewers and surface waters. Priority: Low Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing Hazards: Hazmat,Water Supply Contamination Implementation: Storm Water Pollution Lead: Water Resources Manager Prevention Program (SWPPP) Est. Cost/Funding Source: Staff Time/Budget 8. Continue to work with State Hazard Mitigation staff to implement lightning detection capabilities at outdoor venues.** Priority: High Implementation: Emergency Preparedness Plan Hazards: Summer Storms (Notification and Warning) Lead: Police,Support Services Manager Est. Cost/Funding Source: Staff Time/Budget Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing 9. Evaluate shelter design opportunities with all new Parks construction projects. Priority: Low Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing Hazards: Summer Storms,Tornado Implementation: Emergency Preparedness Plan Lead: Police,Support Services Manager Est. Cost/Funding Source: Staff Time/Budget 10. Evaluate physical security needs for government facilities and acquire appropriate resources.**/* Priority: High Implementation: Cooperative planning: Police, Hazards: Civil Unrest PW, P&R, DCDPC Lead: Police Est. Cost/Funding Source: $150,000-200,000& Status/Completion: New/Ongoing staff time for assessment/TBD, possible grants 11. Improve situational awareness and monitoring efforts regarding events which may incite civil unrest. Priority: High Implementation: Expand monitoring capabilities Hazards: Civil Unrest of crime analyst and establish new Investigative Lead: Police Specialist position. Status/Completion: New/Ongoing,Add Est. Cost/Funding Source: $110,000/Budget investigative Specialist by 2022 12. Update EOC technology to improve local emergency response capabilities Priority: Medium Status/Completion: New/2024 Hazards: All Implementation: Acquisition of new technology Lead: Police, Fire Est. Cost/Funding Source: $89,000/TBD 13. Expand drone capabilities to aid in expediting response size-up and damage assessment. Priority: Medium Status/Completion: New/2024 Hazards: Natural Disasters Implementation: Police Drone Team Lead: Police, Community Development coordination with Chief Building Official Est. Cost/Funding Source: TBD/TBD *Reduces risk to buildings or infrastructure ** Evaluates comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions/projects;identifies which were selected for implementation Page 172 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Implementation Resources Table E.10 identifies staff resources and roles in implementing its mitigation strategies.Table E.11 identifies process and ordinance resources. Table E.10: Eagan Mitigation Implementation Resources Department, General Role Processes Implementing Mitigation Strategies Responsible Position Building Inspections, City Building inspections,regulation of new Adoption and enforcement of state building code, Building Inspector housing development evaluation of additional safety standards and revision of city ordinance as needed. Planning and Zoning, Zoning,development,Comprehensive Floodplain management and land use planning. Planning Director Plans Police,Police Chief Public safety,law enforcement, Emergency response training,public safety education, emergency response emergency operations planning. Public Works,Public Works Development and operations of public Management of transportation infrastructure,storm and Director infrastructure(roads,utilities) sanitary sewer systems and the water production system, and surface water protection. Fire Department,Fire Chief Public and fire safety enforcement, Emergency response training,public education,fire code emergency response enforcement in construction. Risk-Security Information Evaluate,address cyber security Committee concerns for City of Eagan Table E.11: Eagan Additional Implementation Resources Eagan Program/Policy/Technical Documents Year adopted/ Method of incorporation into the hazard revised mitigation plan Storm Water Management Plan 2008,(MS4 in 2013) Flood management reference Capital Improvement Program 2020 Infrastructure upgrades to support hazard mitigation Emergency Preparedness Plan 2019 Hazard ID and ranking Water Quality and Wetland Management Plan 2020 Flood control reference,pond sediment removal Water Supply Distribution Report 2008 Reference document related to drinking water protection hazard Comprehensive Sewer Plan 2008 Infrastructure improvement information Supports mitigation efforts through sharing 2040 Comprehensive Plan 2020 consistent objectives in the area of reducing the impacts of known hazards City Code Chapter 4-Construction Licensing, Permits and Regulations,Excavations,and Mobile 2010 (Includes the State Building Code),reference Home Parks regarding garage door requirements City Code Chapter 10,Sec. 10.40-Minnesota 2010 Reference regarding grill ordinance Uniform Fire Code City Code Chapter 11,Sec. 11.66-Floodplain 2010 Reviewed to ensure consistent floodplain Overlay District management objectives City Code Chapter 11,Sec. 11.67 Wetlands 2010 Reference regarding existing flood control Protection and Management Regulations Page 173 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 CITY OF FARMINGTON Table F.1:Farmington Community Data Hillsdale west Population (2020): 23,632 Mendota St Paul St Paul Mendota Households: 7,906 H el ghts SunfishLake Employment/Jobs: 4,431 InYef Grave Area: 14.8 Sq. Mi. Eagan Height` Major Land Uses: 52% Ag/Undevel. 27% Residential R°rn'yilfe Apple Valley Ru sem aunt Nininger 11% Park and Rec Trip Hastings Coates Community Type: Emerging Suburban Ravenna Edge Lakeville Ern ire Twp vermillion Marshan Twp Twp Undeveloped Area: 52% Farming o Vermillion Twp A Source:Metropolitan Council Community Profiles New Trier Ham won Miesvilie Eureka Twp Castle Rock Two Hazards of Concern Hampton Twp Douglas Twp Farmington staff evaluated potential hazards of Randolph Twp Waterford Randolph concern in their community, using the same Greenvale Twp Twp Sciota rating model used by Dakota County and other Imp "��e "w . .� Northl.ld i�jwra.owni.w°rl participating cities. Figure F.1:City of Farmington Location Table F.2: Dakota County Hazard Rating Model Parameter Rating=1 Rating=2 Rating=3 Rating=4 Frequency Unlikely:<1%chance in Occasional: 1 to 10% Likely:>10 to<100% Highly Likely:100% 100 years chance in next year chance in next year chance in next year Warning Time More than 12 hours 6-12 hours 3-6 hours None-minimal Extent Localized Community-wide County-wide or greater Likely Impact Negligible Limited Critical Catastrophic Table F.3:Farmington Hazard Rating Hazard Frequency Warning Geographic Likely Total Time Extent Impact Water Supply Contamination 2 4 2 4 12 Terrorism 2 4 3 3 12 Cyber Threats 3 4 2 3 12 Violent Summer Storms (e.g.,wind, hail) 4 4 1 2 11 Structural Fire 4 4 1 2 11 Hazardous Material Incidents 2 4 2 3 11 Wastewater Treatment Plant Failure 2 4 3 2 11 Extreme Heat or Cold 4 1 3 2 10 Infectious Disease Outbreak/Pandemic 2 1 3 4 10 Civil Unrest 2 4 2 2 10 Tornado 2 3 1 3 9 Violent Winter Storms 2 2 3 2 9 Flash Flood 3 4 1 1 9 Drought 3 1 3 1 8 Overland Flood(spring snowmelt) 3 1 1 2 7 Wildfire 1 4 1 1 7 Landslide 1 4 1 1 7 Dam Failure 1 4 1 1 7 Page 174 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 General Land Use Figure F.2 depicts general land 2020 Generalized Land Use use in Farmington,with Farmington agricultural and open being the JI 1 'i' predominant land use. ~' `ilm_ s 1 , I- - - Structural Inventory , �� ' _i hs t Value I ZZ t Table F.4 provides a current 1 t \ II �� l�" .E gek total and estimated value for �- structures in the City of le Farmington. Data are from the 1� \.r5- "„, Dakota County's Offices of �` 111 l ) • ' ~� _ Assessor Services and y dfL _ _"11 'iir---___- Geographic Information i +71-r- L- Services. Structures identified i �'` t �° �� - Jr� as residential, commercial, i _AV industrial, and agricultural have i 3, �r 1 I — q• :. L J •,�- thetypes of structures L .- _ -- 1d/NIM ly associated with those land uses. l .:��ik..io, i "Exempt" includes all buildings 7 4.1 ° l-•-- ■ °°Im 1 not subject to property taxes, i :4 1r II r•_3'* such as government buildings, T ° _ ?.. r schools, and places of worship. - r• T 4 "Utilities" includes fixed sites - 0' it <' ..ram' —,- ,-.— with infrastructure for Aar'a:Irrak ly +ch=C E'463 mile* electricity, sewer, and water. 2020 Land Use Classes AL Si.5/mly Resircni.a! ..vi0A WylhrSwnd Atixrc r.•r. Aneusavl ApriraL.zi i.•anr�oon-anon "Other" includes structures that Fermaa+c _,Ew:e r�.lk.++l-+'.^ni fl ra:m ll::r.i...is r..:0.am.I r ,y nu-..ml •..iir...r)•..,, U w.a,.'nbc�e- �LMf.-I. _..., ri0nD.ren•d,Deli cd a,an,..cnl r.l:.:��:.��.•.��:. rw ai.alhwemen base. M,. do not fall into preceding m Feo,� s M e.�,er,-_Ca».m..n. 69,Hl.1 , .. categories. o�Q ..ate m�.x ',WI inns u�o�ee.,,«.,rx•- ra,+w+nmallm.rFr-:rn ,erne Ime unener,en+.•e r r ne m.��a w.�yrA„n s,r-.. ..,_a,Ansata nm an se..vwnp,l la-w.mas•Innle.ecoaceo•Fire c wac•cairn/Amon-Gm.. Zik ea'.C.0 B�srcnGry Ci�a UTTowm•AW 6vundaSa —Roads rty Rn.,rmY m7 Po,oel Aounrmry — we r ve --sa,l Tr'''. MET400LVJT.V• Figure F.2: Farmington Land Use 2020, Metropolitan Council Table F.4:Structural Inventory and Value,Farmington Use Type Number of Land Value Structural Value Total Value Structures Agricultural $51,288,900 $4,783,700 $56,072,600 192 Commercial $28,061,900 $44,133,800 _ $72,195,700 146 Exempt $37,066,800 $161,975,400 $199,042,200 199 Industrial $14,045,300 $32,342,300 $46,387,600 72 Other $216,700 $804,200 _ $1,020,900 13 Residential $559,605,600 $1,702,998,800 _ $2,262,604,400 8,015 Utilities $3,737,100 $21,038,500 $24,775,600 46 TOTAL $694,022,300 $1,968,076,700 $2,662,099,000 8,683 Page 175 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Vulnerability Vulnerable Populations Table F.5 provides current estimates of populations in Farmington considered by FEMA to be at potentially increased risk during hazard events. Table F.5: Farmington Potentially Vulnerable Populations,American Community Survey 2015-2019 Estimates Potentially Vulnerable Farmington, MN— Population Percentage(%) U.S. (%) U.S. Difference Under Age 5 8.6% 6.1% 2.7% Over Age 65 7.9% 13.7% -5.8% Below Federal Poverty 2.2% 13.4% -11.2% Line Living with a Disability 6.0% 15.6% -9.6% Vulnerability of Critical Assets to Hazards Farmington staff evaluated potential vulnerabilities of critical facilities to their hazards of concern, provided in Table F.6. These hazards were identified as having minimal or no likely impact to critical facilities:flash flood, overland flood, dam failure, wildfire, and landslide. Figure F.3 provides general locations for selected critical assets in Farmington. Table F.6:Farmington Assessment of Critical Assets(Redacted in Public Version of Plan) c 0 N N Ll C E m £ £ U E N W Y O LL 'a 0 N = L L E L N 6 Ll u Y 0 0 C p0 H L Critical Facilities a`, c V 'o 0 ? o £ ~ C °' > C 1.;v S x c v Changes Since the 2016 Plan City staff identified land use changes and additions to critical facilities since the last plan update in 2016: • New city wells Page 176 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Fi:ure F.3:City of Farmington—Critical Facilities(Redacted in Public Version of Plan) National Flood Insurance Program Participation and Compliance Table F.7 includes information on Farmington's participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Additional information follows about City compliance with the terms of the NFIP. Table F.7: Farmington NFIP Participation Current Effective Policies Insurance Community CID Number Map Date In-force In-force Farmington 270104 2011 10 $2,878,000 Compliance: Compliance is ensured through use of the City's official flood zoning map and enforcement of City Ordinances related to floodplain zones, allowed/prohibited uses, standards, addressing violations, plan review, and inspections. Table F.8 provides an inventory and assessed value of structures in the City of Farmington located within the digital flood insurance rate map (DFIRM) boundaries. Structures are listed by predominant land use categories. The table was compiled with data from the Dakota County Office of GIS and Assessor's Office. Page 177 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Table F.8: Total Floodplain Structure and Value Inventory,Farmington Structure Type Estimated Land Value Estimated Building Value Total Value Total Structures Agricultural $992,800 $779,400 $1,772,200 12 Exempt $1,396,500 $14,501,600 $15,898,100 9 Residential $19,158,300 $61,853,300 $81,011,600 228 Utilities $3,568,400 $20,250,400 $23,818,800 4 Total $25,116,000 $97,384,700 $122,500,700 253 Strategy Review and Development In 2021, Farmington staff reviewed strategies from the 2016 Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan for implementation progress (See Appendix Ill) and to identify strategies to carry forward into the 2022 Plan update as ongoing efforts or project that have not been completed. City staff considered and addressed FEMA requirements for: 1. A mitigation strategy that identifies and analyzes a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions and projects and further identifies which actions were selected for implementation 2. At least one strategy to reduce risk to buildings and infrastructure City staff also developed new strategies reflective of remaining concerns and vulnerabilities. Table F.9 presents Farmington's strategies,with information on hazards, priority, implementation lead, and costs. Table F.9: Farmington All-Hazard Mitigation Plan Strategies FARMINGTON MITIGATION STRATEGIES 1. Identify 302 Facilities,Debris Management and Staging Plans.** Priority: High Lead: Police Dept., Public Works STAPLEE: High Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing Hazards:Summer Storms,Tornado, Hazmat Implementation: Emergency Preparedness Plan Incidents Est. Cost/Funding Source: 2. Continue Water Tower Inspection* Priority: Medium-High Status/Completion: Existing/Continual STAPLEE: High Implementation: As needed Hazards: Water Supply Contamination Est. Cost/Funding Source: City Budget Lead: Water Department 3. Replace water and sewer lines identified as insufficient* Priority: High Status/Completion: Existing-New/Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Capital Improvement Program Hazards: Flash Floods, Backups Est. Cost/Funding Source: varies/City Budget, Lead: City Engineer Bonding 4. Wellhead Protection Maintenance* Priority: High Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: City Permits Hazards: Water Supply Contamination Est. Cost/Funding Source: Lead: City Administration, MN Dept. of Health 5. Fire Truck Replacement or Refurbishment* Priority: High Implementation: Emergency Operations Plan, STAPLEE: Medium Capital Improvement Program, Mutual Aid Hazards: Structural Fire, Multiple Natural Agreements Hazards Est. Cost/Funding Source: $100,000 yearly/ Lead: Fire Department,Chief General Fund Status/Completion: Existing/TBT Page 178 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 6. Police Car Replacement* Priority: High STAPLEE: High Implementation: Emergency Operations Plan, Hazards: Multiple Capital Improvement Program, Mutual Aid Lead: Police Department,Chief Agreements Status/Completion: Existing/TPT Est. Cost/Funding Source:$170,000 yearly/ General Fund 7. Continue NIMS training Priority: Medium Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Emergency Operations Plan Hazards:All Est. Cost/Funding Source: Staff Time/City Budget Lead: Police Dept.,Chief 8. Examine solutions for Vermillion River Flooding Priority: High Implementation: Engineering, Public Works, STAPLEE: High Police Hazards: Flood Est. Cost/Funding Source: Staff Time/City Lead: Engineering, Public Works, Police Budget Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing 14. Continue to construct mitigation solutions to flood-prone areas of city to reduce or eliminate damage and improve emergency access during flooding. Priority: High Implementation: Capital Improvement Plan Hazards: Flood (CIP) Lead: City Staff-Engineering, Public Works Est. Cost/Funding Source: Staff Time/City Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing Budget 15. Complete Detailed Flood Study Priority: High Status/Completion: New/2022 Hazards: Flood Implementation: CIP Lead: Staff: Engineering, Public Works Est. Cost/Funding Source: TBD/City Budget 16. Reduce Risk to County Network Infrastructure and Software Applications Priority: High Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing Hazards: Cyber-Attack Implementation: Operations Lead: City IT Est. Cost/Funding Source: TBD/City Budget 17. Continue completing cyber security exercises as part of COOP planning Priority: High Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing Hazards: Cyber-Attack Implementation: Operations Lead: City IT Est. Cost/Funding Source: TBD/City Budget 18. Regularly develop programs and projects to identify and address cyber-security weaknesses and new threats(e.g.,USB lockdown,vendor management) Priority: High Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing Hazards: Cyber-Attack Implementation: Operations Lead: City IT Est. Cost/Funding Source: TBD/City Budget 19. Continue ongoing staff training in cyber security and new threats Priority: High Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing Hazards: Cyber-Attack Implementation: Operations Lead: City IT Est. Cost/Funding Source: TBD/City Budget 20. Invest in hardware and IT infrastructure improvements(e.g.,encrypted storage) Priority: High Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing Hazards: Cyber-Attack Implementation: Operations Lead: City IT Est. Cost/Funding Source: TBD/City Budget 21. Periodically review best practices through the IT Advisory Team Priority: High Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing Hazards: Cyber-Attack Implementation: Operations Lead: City IT Est. Cost/Funding Source: TBD/City Budget Page 179 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 22. Municipal service vehicle replacement Priority: Low Status/Completion: New/Ongoing Hazards: Severe Weather,Tornado, Flooding Implementation: CIP Lead: Public Works Est. Cost/Funding Source: TBD/City Budget *Reduces risk to buildings or infrastructure ** Evaluates a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions;identifies which actions were selected for implementation Implementation Resources: Table F.10 identifies Farmington staff resources and their roles in implementing its mitigation strategies. Table F.10: Farmington Mitigation Implementation Resources Department, General Role Processes and Tool for Implementing Responsible Position Mitigation Strategies Building inspections: Building inspections, regulation of Enforce safety restrictions, e.g.,setbacks, Ken Lewis new housing development building materials,fire suppression systems Planning/Zoning: Zoning,development siting and Floodplain ordinances and compliance Tony Wippler restrictions, Comprehensive Plans Police:Chief Public safety and law enforcement, Response training,public safety education Gary Rutherford emergency response Public Works: Development and operations of City well inspection and maintenance Katy Gehler public infrastructure(roads, utilities) Fire Department: Public and fire safety enforcement, Inspect commercial structures for fire hazards Chief Justin Elvestad emergency response Table F.11 identifies implementation resources related to processes and ordinances. Table F.11: Farmington Additional Implementation Resources Program/Ordinance/Study/ Adopted or Relation to the Hazard Mitigation Plan Strategies Technical Document Revised 1. Emergency Operations Plan 2015 Response and recovery 2. Capital Improvement Plan Annually Equipment replacement and procurement 3. Street Improvement Plan Annually Maintenance and Reconstruction 4. Zoning Ordinance Annually Development standards 5. Building Codes Annually City utilizes State Building Codes 6. MN Uniform Fire Code Annually City utilizes State Fire Codes 7. Storm Water Management 2015 Standards for run-off control Existing and new Page 180 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 CITY OF HAMPTON Table HM.1: Hampton Community Data utyda,e west Population (2020): 744 Mendota St Pauf StP ul Mendota Households: 274 Heights Luke sh Employment/Jobs: 205 Inver Grove Area: 1.3 Sq. Mi. Eagan Heights Major Land Uses: 74% Ag./Undevel. 15% Residential g°r"=""le le Pp Rosemount Nininger 2% Park and Rec. ValleyTwp Hastings Coates Community Type: Rural Center/Ag. Ravenn. Undeveloped Area: 74% Lakeville Empire Twp yAermlllEon Marshan Twp Twp Source:Metropolitan Council Community Profiles FarmingtonVer nikl on Twp JI Eureka Twp Castle Rock Twp H p n New Trier � Hazards of Concern MI°II'I Hampton Twp ❑oug,as Twp Hampton representatives evaluated potential hazards of concern in their community, using ' Randolph Twp Waterford Randolph the same rating model used by Dakota County TWP Sc Iota Greenvale Twp and other participating cities. • I.i •>z»4��b m_ Twp 1477,°`: "W"""' '"'"" v om.wrc no iMse Yorthilthl Figure HM.1:City of Hampton Location Table HM.2: Dakota County Hazard Rating Model Parameter Rating=1 Rating=2 Rating=3 Rating=4 Frequency Unlikely:<1%chance in Occasional: 1 to 10% Likely:>10 to<100% Highly Likely:100% 100 years chance in next year chance in next year chance in next year Warning Time More than 12 hours 6-12 hours 3-6 hours None-minimal Extent Localized Community-wide County-wide or greater Likely Impact Negligible Limited Critical Catastrophic Table HM.3: Hampton Hazard Rating Hazard Frequency Warning Geographic Likely Impact Total Time Extent Violent Winter Storms 4 2 3 1.5 10.5 Terrorism 1 4 2 3 10 Wildfire 1.5 4 2.5 2 9 Infectious Disease Outbreak/Pandemic 2 1 3 3 9 Dam Failure 1 3 2 3 9 Violent Summer Storms 2 2.5 2 2 8.5 Structural Fire 1.5 4 1 2 8.5 Hazardous Material Incidents 2 4 1 1.5 8.5 Tornado 1.5 3 1 2.5 8 Drought 2 1 3 2 8 Extreme Heat or Cold 2 1 3 2 8 Civil Unrest 1 4 1 2 8 Flash Flood 1 2 2 2.5 7.5 Cyber Threats 1 4 1 1 7 Overland Flood(spring snowmelt) 1 1 2 2.5 6.5 Water Supply Contamination 1 1 2 1 5 Wastewater Treatment Plant Failure 1 1 2 1 5 Landslide 1 1 1 1 4 Page 181 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 General Land Use Figure HM.2 depicts general 2020 Generalized Land Use • land use in Hampton, with Hampton agricultural and open being the Ez predominant land use. 011 Structural Inventory Value _. . . Ai i-Lt Table HM.4 provides a current 111 total and estimated value for structures in the City of ] �. Hampton. Data are from the • Dakota County's Offices of 4 v: \ Assessor Services and Geographic Information . ! Services. Structures identified l I � as residential, commercial, f i industrial, and agricultural have y L the types of structures { associated with those land uses. "Exempt" includes all buildings not subject to property taxes, I such as government buildings, schools, and places of worship. - "Utilities" includes fixed sites MEL with infrastructure for AP�XiMECIy 'i""— 17B03 mik' 2020 Land Use Classes i► electricity, sewer, and water. Ski!Fewly Rne,iu rieJ nionzwar ReeMerlaii1tl Mtl,O, Aonwturar I.F!! L n a.tl.a�:-,,»a:1 FO� ,a..1L�,aa -t ]a! M! Iaau ., ..,a,.,d, a Ho., "Other" includes structures that °•R.u.� "^'°°" M"rc,a ww " -' ^ Mcro M g, .'".r"Lkcenee CaMMOIVr0 1111"' ..R..,rmcwl W A EN V RawwWn '•imrci do not fall into precedingRMnC mrrcu a.�mo�r MI a*O•., categories. LI aria-Ccmr+y •:It.>aircre-fe+Cnrck• Cou„NyBaurdarr Cityand TowchiF 9oundarios —Roads -�-a RaIF y _3i,iiaaiy n .. ��..n °;Z:, in -x-i r i.r -I- I;C1PI,L1TSV Figure HM.2: Hampton Land Use 2020,Metropolitan Council Table HM.4:Structural Inventory and Value, Hampton Use Type Land Value 1 Structural Value Total Value Number of Structures I Agricultural $3,853,100 $195,200 $4,048,300 18 Commercial $1,147,600 $934,500 $2,082,100 12 Exempt $870,800 $1,381,200 $2,252,000 13 Industrial $149,000 $455,000 $604,000 7 Residential $13,698,700 $43,766,700 $57,465,400 327 HAMPTON Total $19,719,200 $46,732,600 $66,451,800 377 Page 182 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Vulnerability Vulnerable Populations Table HM.5 provides current estimates of populations in Hampton considered by FEMA to be at potentially increased risk during hazard events. Table HM.5: Hampton Potentially Vulnerable Populations,American Community Survey 2015-2019 Estimates Potentially Vulnerable Percentage o Hampton, MN— Population (%) U.S. (�) U.S. Difference Under Age 5 5.5% 6.1% -0.6% Over Age 65 4.4% 13.7% -9.3% Below Federal Poverty Line 7.7% 13.4% -5.7% Living with a Disability 4.5% 15.6% -11.1% Vulnerability of Critical Assets to Hazards Hampton representatives evaluated potential vulnerabilities of critical facilities to their hazards of concern, provided in Table HM.6. These hazards were identified as having minimal or no likely impact to critical facilities: hazmat incidents,flash flood, winter storms, water supply contamination, overland flood, wildfire, drought, extreme temperatures, dam failure, and landslide. Figure 3 provides general locations for selected critical assets in Hampton. Table HM.6:Assessment of Critical Assets, Hampton (Redacted in Public Version of Plan) u E O y v m N cI = -{3 v E -o E o m c Y„ o +' U OLL 'O O E Vf N O W N i E E ;a .5 E Y Y L - O m c .O 'a O N " - E 0 u m a N 3 —' m i — E E c E N E LL O a ar 1- U Y m H m 3 c H u Y w CO C Changes since the 2016 Plan City staff identified no significant land use changes or additions to critical facilities since the last plan update in 2016. Page 183 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Figure HM.3:City of Hampton—Critical Facilities(Redacted in Public Version of Plan) National Flood Insurance Program Participation and Compliance The City of Hampton does not participate in in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). GIS analyses of DFIRM boundaries and property data did not locate structures within the floodplain in the City of Hampton. Strategy Review and Development In 2021, Hampton officials reviewed strategies from the 2016 Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan for implementation progress (See Appendix III) and to identify strategies to carry forward into the 2022 Plan update as ongoing efforts or project that have not been completed. City staff considered and addressed FEMA requirements for: 1. A mitigation strategy that identifies and analyzes a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions and projects and further identifies which actions were selected for implementation 2. At least one strategy to reduce risk to buildings and infrastructure City staff also developed new strategies reflective of remaining concerns and vulnerabilities. Table 7 presents Hampton's strategies, with additional information on hazards addressed by the strategy, priority, lead implementation agency, and estimated costs. Page 184 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Table 7: Hampton All-Hazard Mitigation Plan Strategies HAMPTON MITIGATION STRATEGIES 1. Replace clay sewer lines. Priority: High Implementation: Capital improvement Program STAPLEE:High (CIP) Hazards: Flash Floods, Backups Est. Cost/Funding Source: Varies/Budget, Lead: City Engineer,W/S Supt.,City Council Bonding Status/Completion: Nearly complete/Ongoing 2. Erect new water tower.* Priority: High Status/Completion: Existing/2024 STAPLEE:High Implementation: CIP Hazards: Structural Fire Protection,Supply Est. Cost/Funding Source: $1 Million/Budget, Lead: City Engineer,W/S Supt.,City Council Bonding 3. Continue to document City critical infrastructure in GIS. Priority: High Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing STAPLEE:High Implementation: Budget and CIP Hazards: All Est. Cost/Funding Source: Varies/City Budget, Lead: City Engineer,Water-Sewer Bonding Superintendent 4. Continue to participate in NIMS training. Priority: High Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing STAPLEE:High Implementation: Budget Hazards: All Est. Cost/Funding Source: Varies/City Budget Lead: Randolph-Hampton Fire Dept. and City, Fire Chief 5. Continue to invest in infrastructure improvements,as funding allows.** Priority: High Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing STAPLEE:High Implementation: Budget Hazards: All Est. Cost/Funding Source: Varies/City Budget Lead: City Council *Reduces risk to buildings or infrastructure **Evaluates a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions;identifies which actions were selected for implementation Implementation Resources: Table HM.8 identifies Hampton staff resources and their roles in implementing its mitigation strategies. Table HM.8: Hampton Staff Implementation Resources Department,Responsible Position General Role Processes and Tool for Implementing Mitigation Strategies Building Inspections, City Building Building inspections, regulation of Enforce restrictions:setbacks, building Inspector(MNSPECT, LLC) new housing development materials and fire suppression systems Planning and Zoning: Planning Zoning,development siting and Floodplain ordinances and compliance Commission,Consulting Planner restrictions,Comprehensive Plans (Bolton and Menk) Law Enforcement,Dakota County Public safety, law enforcement, Response training,public safety Sheriff's Office emergency response education Public Works,City Engineer(Bolton Develop/operate public City well inspection and maintenance and Menk) infrastructure(roads, utilities) Fire Department, Fire Chief Fire safety enforcement,emergency Inspect commercial structures for response hazards Page 185 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Department,Responsible Position General Role Processes and Tool for Implementing Mitigation Strategies City Council and Mayor City governance Policy, annual budgets and CIP Table HM.9 identifies implementation resources related to processes and ordinances. Table HM.9: Hampton Additional Implementation Resources Program/Ordinance/Document Adopted- Relation to Mitigation Plan Implementation Revised Emergency Operations Plan, EOC Drills Increases ability to respond in emergencies, enhance communications Capital Improvement Plan and Annual Annually Allocates funds to City priorities(structural and Budget operations) Allows uses within areas of the cities, avoiding hazard Zoning Ordinance prone areas Building Codes Emphasize safe construction requirements Standard Operating Guidelines for Define and update protocols for emergency situations Emergencies Comprehensive Plan 12-10-2019 Addresses future growth needs in the City Page 186 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 CITY OF HASTINGS Table HS.1:Hastings Community Data tilydale west Population (2020): 22,154 Mendota St Paul!Paul Mendota e Households: 9,129 H ights SunfishLake - Employment/Jobs: 6,972 Inver Grove Area: 12.0 Sq. Mi. Eagan Heights Major Land Uses: 33% Residential 21% Ag./Undevel. Burnsville Apple Rosemount Nininger 18% Park/Rec. Valley Twp Hastings 5.% Institutional `Oates -- Ravenna! Community Type: Emerging Suburb Edge Lakeville Empire Twp Vermillion Marshan Twp Twp Undeveloped Area: 21% FarmingtonVermillion Twp Source:Metropolitan Council Community Profiles - I, Hampton New Trier MIesviile Hazards of Concern Eureka Twp Castle Rock Twp Hampton Twp Douglas Twp Hastings staff evaluated potential hazards of concern in their community, using the same Randal ph Twp at...,.... Randolph rating model used by Dakota County and other Twp Ed.,. . : v Greenvale Twp TwP l participating cities. ;tio' t T�;,ror' �. .. o hem r In tr�i�rrtMI1lVnn'n non i Figure HS.1:City of Hastings Location Table HS.2:Dakota County Hazard Rating Model Parameter Rating=1 Rating=2 Rating=3 Rating=4 Frequency Unlikely:<1%chance in Occasional: 1 to 10% Likely:>10 to<100% Highly Likely: 100% 100 years chance in next year chance in next year chance in next year Warning Time More than 12 hours 6-12 hours 3-6 hours None-minimal Extent Localized Community-wide County-wide or greater Likely Impact Negligible Limited Critical Catastrophic Table HS.3:Hastings Hazard Rating Warning Geographic Likely Hazard Frequency Total Time Extent Impact Violent Summer Storms (e.g.,wind,hail) 4 3 3 3 13 Tornado 3 4 2 3 12 Structural Fire 4 4 1 2 11 Hazardous Material Incidents 3 4 1 2 11 Infectious Disease Outbreak/Pandemic 4 1 3 3 11 Water Supply Contamination 3 4 2 2 11 CyberThreats 4 4 1 2 11 Extreme Heat or Cold 4 1 3 2 10 Violent Winter Storms 3 1 3 2 9 Drought 2 1 3 3 9 Wastewater Treatment Plant Failure 2 4 1 2 9 Terrorism 2 4 1 2 9 Civil Unrest 2 3 2 2 9 Dam Failure 1 4 1 3 9 Wildfire 1 4 1 2 8 Landslide 1 4 1 2 8 Flash Flood 2 2 1 2 7 Overland Flood(spring snowmelt) 3 1 1 2 7 Page 187 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 General Land Use Figure HS.2 depicts general land 2020 Generalized Land Use use in Hastings, with residential Hastings (single-and multi-family) being • dilr r the predominant land use. Y — � ~.r, ; L _. Structural Inventory 1 ,: '-- f • Value \ V ` Table HS.4 provides a current i _ total and estimated value for - _ f structures in the City of ' fi.....,,_,,..,.......-- Hastings. i\ L ' _ 'J new ..:■. Data are from the Dakota �" ,• :etill,.T M _ :: :�,r.i, County's Offices of AssessorL � �.-__=II:'Ii�CIrS:;i.l. Services and Geographick. ,� I r■■ I I II k Information Services. _ t14 `-11 i .■ills° -lit _ Structures identified as a� i�:i 1 ��m�l -fi _ residential, commercial, NIT 1 E I • p e industrial, and agricultural have - i.,1;. _ l ' J the types of structures ='.� . ' �11, - associated with those land uses. "� � ; "Exempt" includes all buildings 1 , ;�.'1 � i not subject to property taxes, Imm@ such as government buildings, " schools, and places of worship. A liMiliAt. k k i6k.Appro.lrrebly 1 inch=0.725M4 miles "Utilities" includes fixed sites 2020 Land Use Classes i re Farmy R.sidemtiai NsMilamdr R.aidm[w Vaal the indamel Aw,.MLral 1raa.poreanw with infrastructure for -... r� .em.,�,1es ®r..r�d_I,Recl..rW ,�,r.urrolerA.1 _ dzo electricity, sewer, and water. m Mt^�um-En ,..Ra„,,.a„.. C.., ,•Ca °e in:rML.,.r... AurMUYan,! +• •n.-...n..... -M,e^fR "Other" includes structures that =` m'. n_ �° ..°' -Lad Ye.Dab Mr.,.wvaiab f nri-•om,a nure:many inn era -Laand uso morn., Mad corn*m.o....wy[arrcs saiamy do not fall into precedingAli -.MR CuurRy Bandary —••Ca and TOMO*9wndMriea —F da ---r Rai WY Parcel m undar1, categories. a b -.p1mn -.a.mr -a. .maI . 0VPppl ^ly Figure HS.2: Hastings Land Use 2020,Metropolitan Council Table HS.4:Structural Inventory and Value,Hastings Use Type Number of Land Value I Structural Value Total Value Structures Agricultural $7,852,600 $725,900 $8,578,500 22 Commercial $64,508,600 $110,575,900 $175,084,500 255 Exempt $68,704,800 $310,686,296 $379,391,104 287 Industrial $12,942,600 $35,722,700 $48,665,300 88 Other $0 $70,900 $70,900 6 Residential $473,879,600 $1,607,516,300 _ $2,081,395,900 9,354 Utilities $494,100 $1,228,900 _ $1,723,000 2 TOTAL $628,382,300 $2,066,526,896 $2,694,909,204 10,014 Page 188 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Vulnerability Vulnerable Populations Table HS.5 provides current estimates of populations in Hastings considered by FEMA to be at potentially increased risk during hazard events. Table HS.5: Hastings Potentially Vulnerable Populations,American Community Survey 2015-2019 Estimates Potentially Vulnerable Percentage (%) U.S. (%) Hastings, MN— Population U.S. Difference Under Age 5 6.0% 6.1% -0.1% Over Age 65 17.0% 13.7% 3.3% Below Federal Poverty Line 6.8% 13.4% -6.6% Living with a Disability 12.2% 15.6% -3.4% Vulnerability of Critical Assets to Hazards Hastings staff evaluated potential vulnerabilities of critical facilities to their hazards of concern, provided in Table HS.6. Figure HS.3 provides general locations for selected critical assets in Hastings. Table HS.6: Hastings Assessment of Critical Assets(Redacted in Public Version of Plan) c 0 o v N N y c £ v c '^ m E c a, -0 E ar as Y s N O LL 72 2 C •0 H E' 6L £ 2 `1 L a z D {/1 co al C Y 0 C LL V1 y tJ '� w 3 E fa N E u N g >' m = 22 E c u E 2 5 E m c a v r > § C a, , _ fa J E .) N LL „ 3 > E o N = LT) 0 i ns Changes since the 2016 Plan Hastings staff identified no significant land use changes or additions to critical facilities since the plan update in 2016. Page 189 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Fi:ure HS.3:Cit of Hastin:s—Critical Facilities(Redacted in Public Version of Plan) National Flood Insurance Program Participation and Compliance Table HS.7 includes information on Hasting's participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Additional information follows about City compliance with the terms of the NFIP. Table HS.7: Hastings NFIP Participation Current Effective Policies Insurance Community CID Number Map Date In-force In-force Hastings 270105 3/16/16 13 $3,292,500 Compliance: Title XV, Chapter 151 of the Hastings City Ordinance governs land use restrictions in floodplain. Compliance is ensured through use of the City's official flood zoning map and enforcement of Title XV, Chapter 151 related to floodplain zones, allowed/prohibited uses, standards, addressing violations, plan review, and inspections. The City works with the Corp of Engineers on annual inspections of flood levees in the City. Table HS.8 provides an inventory and assessed value of structures in Hastings located within the digital flood insurance rate map (DFIRM) boundaries. Structures are listed by predominant land use categories. The table was compiled with data from the Dakota County Office of GIS and Assessor's Office. Page 190 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Table HS.8: Total Floodplain Structure and Value Inventory,Hastings Structure Type Estimated Land Value Estimated Building Value Total Value Total Structures Exempt $2,151,800 $4,378,400 $6,530,200 38 Residential $3,466,100 $4,917,600 $8,383,700 54 TOTAL $5,617,900 $9,296,000 $14,913,900 92 Strategy Review and Development In 2021, Hastings staff reviewed their strategies from the 2016 Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan for implementation progress (See Appendix III) and to identify strategies to carry forward into the 2022 Plan update as ongoing efforts or project that have not been completed. City staff considered and addressed FEMA requirements for: 1. A mitigation strategy that identifies and analyzes a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions and projects and further identifies which actions were selected for implementation 2. At least one strategy to reduce risk to buildings and infrastructure City staff also developed new strategies reflective of remaining concerns and vulnerabilities. Table HS.9 lists Hasting's strategies,with additional information on hazards addressed by the strategy, priority, lead implementation agency, and estimated costs. Table HS.9: Hastings All-Hazard Mitigation Plan Strategies HASTINGS MITIGATION STRATEGIES 1. Update Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) Priority:Low Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing STAPLEE:High Implementation: Periodic updates Hazards:All Est. Cost/Funding Source: Staff Time/General Lead: Emergency Management, Director Fund 2. Replace water/sewer/storm sewer lines(new and existing)* Priority: Medium Status/Completion: Existing and New/ STAPLEE:High Implementation: Capital Improvement Plan Hazards: Flash Flood,Water supply (CIP) Lead: Public Works, Director Est. Cost/Funding Source: TBD/TBD 3. Continue wellhead protection Priority: High Implementation: Wellhead Protection Plan STAPLEE:High Est. Cost/Funding Source: $1,500 yearly/Water Hazards: Water Supply Contamination Fund—Commodity Charges Lead: Public Works, Director Notes:Plan complete, annual reporting and Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing notification requirements 4. Continue stormwater management(replacing undersized storm sewers and improving water quality)* Priority: Medium Implementation: Capital Improvement Plan STAPLEE:High (CIP) Hazards: Flooding,Severe Summer Storms Est. Cost/Funding Source: TBD/Stormwater Lead: Public Works, Director Utility and City Debt Status/Completion: Existing and New/Ongoing 5. Continue with drainage and erosion control plans Priority: Medium Status/Completion: Existing and New/Ongoing STAPLEE:High Implementation: Building Safety and Hazards: Flooding Community Development Lead: Planning, Building Safety Est. Cost/Funding Source: TBD/General Fund Page 191 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 6. Continue to enforce zoning and permits regulations in floodplains** Priority: Medium Status/Completion: Existing and New/Ongoing STAPLEE:High Implementation: Building Safety and Hazards: Flooding Community Development Lead: Planning and Building Safety, Director Est. Cost/Funding Source: TBD/General Fund 7. Monitor construction,improvements,alterations,and development in floodplains Priority: Medium Status/Completion: Existing and New/Ongoing STAPLEE:Medium Implementation: Building Safety and Hazards: Flooding Community Development Lead: Planning and Building Safety, Director Est. Cost/Funding Source: TBD/General Fund 8. Ensure Building Code compliance* Priority: High Implementation: Building Safety and STAPLEE:High Community Development Hazards: Multiple Est. Cost/Funding Source: TBD/General Fund Lead: Building Safety, Director Notes:new homes to have two feet of Status/Completion: Existing and New/Ongoing freeboard/runoff area 9. Continue to enforce mixed occupancy fire alarm ordinance Priority: Medium Status/Completion: Existing and New/Ongoing STAPLEE:High Implementation: Community Development Hazards: Structural Fire Est. Cost/Funding Source: Staff Time/General Lead: Fire Department, Chief Fund 10. Continue to enforce burning bans/restrictions Priority: Medium Status/Completion: Existing and New/Ongoing STAPLEE:High Implementation: Fire Department enforcement Hazards: Wildfire,Structural Fire Est. Cost/Funding Source: Staff Time/General Lead: Fire Department, Chief Fund 11. Conduct Emergency Operations Center Drills Priority: Implementation: Emergency management STAPLEE:Medium training Hazards: All Est. Cost/Funding Source: Staff Time/General Lead: Emergency Management, Director Fund Status/Completion: Existing and New/Ongoing 12. Educate and train staff on Illicit Discharge Detection Elimination(IDDE)to eliminate discharge to storm sewers Priority: Medium Status/Completion: New/Ongoing STAPLEE:High Implementation: Engineering Dept.training Hazards: Est. Cost/Funding Source: Lead: Public Works/Engineering/Emergency Management, Director 13. Evaluate need for additional storm sirens related to community growth Priority: Medium Status/Completion: New/Ongoing Hazards: Severe storms, hazmat incidents Implementation: Emergency Mgmt. Lead: Public Works/Engineering/Emergency Est. Cost/Funding Source: TBD/Grant,general Management, Director fund 14. Conduct water main leak detection survey Priority: Low Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing STAPLEE:High Implementation: Public Works Hazards: Pressure Loss, Road Integrity Est. Cost/Funding Source: TBD/Water Fund Lead: Public Works/Engineering/Emergency Management, Director Page 192 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 15. First Street Flooding Mitigation* Priority: Status/Completion: New/2026 STAPLEE:Medium Implementation: Wall Dam project Hazards: Flooding Est. Cost/Funding Source: $1,000,000/federal Lead: Public Works/Engineering/Emergency FEMA Management, Director 16. Remove/Demolish Hazardous Property(-ies)* Priority: Status/Completion: New/Ongoing STAPLEE:Medium Implementation: Construction projects Hazards: Structural Fire Est. Cost/Funding Source: $1,000,000/HEDRA Lead: City, HEDRA 17. Vermillion Corridor Update Priority: Status/Completion: New/2025 STAPLEE: Medium Implementation: Roadway project(s) Hazards: Aging road infrastructure/utilities Est. Cost/Funding Source: $115,000,000/ Lead: MNDOT MNDOT 18. Mitigate Civil Unrest Priority: Status/Completion: New/Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Social Impact programs Hazards: Civil Unrest Est. Cost/Funding Source: $200,000/City Lead: Hastings Police, Chief Budget *Reduces risk to buildings or infrastructure **Evaluated a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions;identified actions were selected for implementation Implementation Resources: Table HS.10 identifies Hastings staff resources and roles in implementing its mitigation strategies. Table HS.10: Hastings Staff Mitigation Implementation Resources Department,Responsible General Role ' Processes and Tools for Implementing Position Mitigation Strategies Building Inspections, City Building inspections, regulation of e.g., enforce safety restrictions including Building Official new housing development setbacks, building materials and fire suppression systems Planning and Zoning Zoning,development siting and e.g.,floodplain ordinances and compliance Community Development restrictions, Comprehensive Plans Director Police, Police Chief Public safety and law enforcement, e.g., response training,public safety emergency response education Public Works, Public Works Develop/operate public e.g., city well inspection and maintenance Director infrastructure(roads, utilities) Fire Department, Fire Chief Public and fire safety enforcement, e.g., response and mitigation, inspect emergency response commercial structures for fire hazards, building and fire suppression plan reviews, public education Page 193 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Table HS.11 identifies process and ordinance resources. Table HS.11: Hastings Additional Implementation Resources Program/Ordinance/Study/ Year Reviewed during Method of incorporation into the hazard Technical Document adopted/revised plan update? mitigation plan Narrow banding of outdoor Yes 2011-2012 Working with Dakota County sirens Completed Educate public on Storm Siren Spring 2011 Yes Community Relations Policy Update EOP 2021 Yes Working with Dakota County Wellhead Protection Updated 2021 Yes Continuous efforts with public Water Supply Updated 2018 Yes Continuous efforts with public Storm Water Management Updated 2018 Yes Continuous efforts with public Mississippi River Flooding Spring 2011 Yes Continuous efforts with public and other agencies Drainage and Erosion Control 2016 Yes Continuous efforts with public Enforce Zoning/permits in Updated 2010 Yes Continuous efforts with public floodplain Monitor construction/improvements Ongoing Yes Continuous efforts with public Ensure Building Code Compliance Ongoing Yes Continuous efforts with public Mixed Occupancy Fire Alarm 2004—Ongoing Yes Continuous efforts with public Burning Bans Updated 2018— Yes Continuous efforts with public follow DNR EOC Drill 2021 Yes Organize with city staff Page 194 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 CITY OF INVER GROVE HEIGHTS Table IG.1: Inver Grove Heights Community Data 1Ulydala yyeSt Population (2020): 35,791 Mendota St Paul 5"thgt Paul Mendota Su ish Households: 14,338 Heights Employment/Jobs: 9,602 Inver Grove Area: 30.0 Sq. Mi. Eagan Heights Major Land Uses: 38% Ag./Undevel. 31% Residential Burnsville Apple Ninin er 9% Park/Rec. Valley Rosemount g Twp Hastings 6% Industrial Coates Ravenna Community Type: Emerging Suburban Lakeville Empire Twp vermillion Twp Marshan Twp Edge/Rural Residential Farmington Vermillion Twp Undeveloped Area: 38% Source: Metropolitan Council CommunityProfiles Hurl ptan New Trier p Miesville Eureka Twp Castle Rock Twp Hazards of Concern Hampton Twp DnuglasTwp Inver Grove Heights staff evaluatedpotential Randolph Twp g Waterford Randolph hazards of concern in their community, using Twp Twp Scioto LT- Greenvale the same rating model used by Dakota County Twp "',=== ae e. a4ai'dT fII yinu. f,i•rnli.id •ww+.i.•^rx•,s.i.a..N.h.Iw+r.h.+�ll..e•. and other participating cities. Figure IG.1:City of Inver Grove Heights Location Table IG.2: Dakota County Hazard Rating Model Parameter Rating=1 Rating=2 Rating=3 Rating=4 Frequency Unlikely:<1%chance in Occasional: 1 to 10% Likely:>10 to<100% Highly Likely:100% 100 years chance in next year chance in next year chance in next year Warning Time More than 12 hours 6-12 hours 3-6 hours None-minimal Extent Localized Community-wide County-wide or greater Likely Impact Negligible Limited Critical Catastrophic Table IG.3: Inver Grove Heights Hazard Rating Hazard Frequency Warning Geographic Likely Total Time Extent Impact Violent Summer Storms (e.g.,wind, hail) 4 3 3 3 13 Tornado 3 4 2 3 12 Structural Fire 4 4 1 2 11 Hazardous Material Incidents 3 4 1 2 11 Infectious Disease Outbreak/Pandemic 4 1 3 3 11 Water Supply Contamination 3 4 2 2 11 CyberThreats 4 4 1 2 11 Extreme Heat or Cold 4 1 3 2 10 Violent Winter Storms 3 1 3 2 9 Drought 2 1 3 3 9 Wastewater Treatment Plant Failure 2 4 1 2 9 Terrorism 2 4 1 2 9 Civil Unrest 2 3 2 2 9 Wildfire 1 4 1 2 8 Landslide 1 4 1 2 8 Dam Failure 1 4 1 2 8 Flash Flood 2 2 1 2 7 Overland Flood (spring snowmelt) 3 1 1 2 7 Page 195 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 General Land Use Figure IG.2 depicts general land 2020 Generalized Land Use use in Inver Grove Heights,with Inver Grove Heights agriculture/undeveloped open grranwomrirw144,militook _,,,,,i,� space being the predominant It i t , ;-; - {iy land uses. • i f _ ja_ 4, ; - 1. .� 1 Iri= oP { l one i _i . '` l Structural Inventory -Ara;. •' '°_ -- '._� ! ^ Value 11 ...to Y Table IG.4 provides a current ! _ 17 ,y.�e� i!' jl total and estimated value for Iblt, --.- ' MI1 rc"" j l ��it. structures in the Cityof Inver L! ( c� him Grove Heights. ' - ;At- i ? ��,,tri11um '� •;� 4 ilk m a Data are from the Dakota �.i'r �t..- J 4 � lIL!f E. �I County's Offices of Assessort. y Pr9f r i7 Services and Geographic `) .10.E i Information Services. i . 40- Structures identified as i i residential, commercial, %6 r', industrial, and agricultural have — .. ' • / the types of structuresr# „A —.T.,i_I i ( associated with those land uses. l Exempt includes all buildings h 6 \ not subject to property taxes, ^-- , te `— "Re A! such as government buildings, ,M., ., „n�_rpa�,miles schools, and places of worship. 2020 Land Use Classes i► 5.v.fN cw.iny R.sn.r'N .w. rye,+y R.,Th'r..w M,4 Ve. NFu,PYl AwrHnf W magarregen "Utilities" includes fixed sites •I ° •M• • •b HM ,�m�• m K *,Mks MB . M.ho� M R° with infrastructure for °� .. ;a ••"rc•°' • �,.°. ... �K •,nn. electricity, sewer, and water. E- "— "' .` O.', I 1'.M.. "Other" includes structures that �°°°°�°�^�°"� ro° °°°�°� ' F�°°� F�°°°° �m- °F°°°°° 46 County 9eudery —•city end Towns*.Murder!. —Roads�' "' pt a AN —t nn�y Pwl 9°un�ry do not fall into preceding a` categories. Figure IG.2:Inver Grove Heights Land Use 2020, Metropolitan Council Table IG.4:Structural Inventory and Value,Inver Grove Heights Use Type Land Value Structural Value Total Value Number of _ Structures Agricultural $45,728,900 $4,947,600 $50,676,500 142 Commercial $141,896,800 $173,966,500 $315,863,300 309 Exempt $83,317,300 $167,773,200 $251,090,500 227 Industrial $50,526,700 $115,417,400 , $165,944,100 250 Other $501,100 $359,400 $860,500 0 Residential $1,027,100,000 $3,042,437,200 I $4,069,537,200 13,897 Utilities $8,440,900 $63,264,000 $71,704,900 127 TOTAL $1,357,511,700 $3,568,165,300 $4,925,677,000 14,952 Page 196 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Vulnerability Vulnerable Populations Table IG.5 provides current estimates of populations in Inver Grove Heights considered by FEMA to be at potentially increased risk during hazard events. Table IG.5: Inver Grove Heights Potentially Vulnerable Populations,American Community Survey 2015-2019 Est. Potentially Vulnerable Percentage(%) U.S. (%) Inver Grove Heights, MN— Population U.S. Difference Under Age 5 4.9% 6.1% -1.2% Over Age 65 15.7% 13.7% 2.0% Below Federal Poverty Line 7.6% 13.4% -5.8% Living with a Disability 11.6% 15.6% -4.0% Vulnerability of Critical Assets to Hazards Inver Grove Heights staff evaluated potential vulnerabilities of critical facilities to their hazards of concern, provided in Table IG.6. Hazards identified as non-applicable to critical facilities include:flash flood, overland flood, dam failure, and landslide. Figure IG.3 provides general locations for selected critical assets in Inver Grove Heights. Table IG.6: Inver Grove Heights Assessment of Critical Assets(Redacted in Public Version of Plan) U o E c • c N a E Y a z. o o LL 'O 5 y L v y 3 Li) 2 •� Y o 'E W oa Critical Facilities a`, E u E y T o o E E ,22 E c o a F > § C v v , m § G H W (J ti ai Changes since the 2016 Plan Inver Grove Heights staff identified no changes to critical facilities since the plan update in 2016, but noted the following city improvements: • Rock Island Swing Bridge recreational area and Heritage Village Park Page 197 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Figure IG.3:City of Inver Grove Heights—Critical Facilities(Redacted in Public Version of Plan) National Flood Insurance Program Participation and Compliance Table IG.7 includes information on Inver Grove Heights' participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Additional information follows about City compliance with the terms of the NFIP. Table IG.7: Inver Grove Heights NFIP Participation Current Effective Policies Insurance Community CID Number Map Date In-force In-force Inver Grove Heights 270106 12/2/11 16 $4,395,000 Compliance: All building permit applications must meet the Flood Plain Ordinance prior to issuance of a building permit. The Flood Plain Ordinance is also a part of our concept review prior to submittal of permit applications. The Community Development Director and City Planner are responsible for issuance of Flood Plain Permits and compliance with the ordinance. Table IG.8 provides an inventory and assessed value of structures in Inver Grove Heights located within the digital flood insurance rate map (DFIRM) boundaries. Structures are listed by predominant land use categories. The table was compiled with data from the Dakota County GIS and Assessor offices. Page 198 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Table IG.8: Total Floodplain Structure and Value Inventory,Inver Grove Heights Structure Type Estimated Land Value Estimated Building Value Total Value Total Structures Commercial $1,466,700 $952,700 $2,419,400 12 Exempt $120,200 $0 $120,200 5 Residential $1,500,600 $2,654,300 $4,154,900 15 TOTAL $3,087,500 $3,607,000 $6,694,500 32 Strategy Review and Development In 2021, Inver Grove Heights staff reviewed their strategies from the 2016 Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan for implementation progress (See Appendix III) and to identify strategies to carry forward into the 2022 Plan update as ongoing efforts or project that have not been completed. City staff considered and addressed FEMA requirements for: 1. A mitigation strategy that identifies and analyzes a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions and projects and further identifies which actions were selected for implementation 2. At least one strategy to reduce risk to buildings and infrastructure City staff also developed new strategies reflective of remaining concerns and vulnerabilities. Table IG.9 lists Inver Grove Heights' strategies, with additional information on hazards addressed by the strategy, priority, lead implementation agency, and estimated costs. Table IG.9: Inver Grove Heights All-Hazard Mitigation Plan Strategies INVER GROVE HEIGHTS MITIGATION STRATEGIES 1. Address wellhead protection needs. Priority: High Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing STAPLEE:High Implementation: Wellhead Protection Plans Hazards: Water Supply Contamination Est. Cost/Funding Source: $2,500 yearly/ Lead: Public Works, Director Water Fund 2. Conduct maintenance on water storage facilities. Priority: High Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing STAPLEE:High Implementation: Contract Engineering, Record Hazards: Water Supply Contamination Keeping Lead: Public Works, Director Est. Cost/Funding Source: $10,200/Water Fund 3. Inspect Wells. Priority: High Implementation: Weekly Checks and Record STAPLEE:High Keeping Hazards: Water Supply Contamination Est. Cost/Funding Source: $30,000 per well/ Lead: Public Works, Director Water Fund Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing 4. Sanitary Sewer Lining for Infiltration and Inflow Management. Priority: High Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing STAPLEE:High Implementation: Maps, Daily Record Keeping Hazards: Flash Flooding, Backups Est. Cost/Funding Source: $75,000 yearly/ Lead: Public Works, Director Sewer Fund 5. Lift Station Maintenance. Priority: High Implementation: Weekly Checks, Record STAPLEE: High Keeping Hazards: Flash Flooding, Backups Est. Cost/Funding Source: Staff Time/Sewer Lead: Public Works, Director Fund Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing Page 199 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 6. Risk Management for Water Treatment Plant. Priority: High Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing STAPLEE:High Implementation: Risk Management Plan Hazards: Water Supply Contamination Est. Cost/Funding Source: $5,000 yearly/ (Chlorine) Water Fund Lead: Public Works, Director 7. Storm Water Management/MS4/Maintenance. Priority: High Implementation: Storm sewer repair, STAPLEE:Medium improvements Hazards: Flash Flooding,Severe Storms Est. Cost/Funding Source: TBD/Stormwater Lead: Public Works, Director Utility,General Fund, Bonding Status/Completion: New-Existing/Ongoing 8. Mississippi River Dike Opening Management/Flood Mitigation. Priority: Low Status/Completion: New-Existing/Ongoing STAPLEE: Medium Implementation: Emergency Preparedness Plan Hazards: Flooding Est. Cost/Funding Source: TBD/General Fund Lead: Public Works, Director 9. Mass Dispensing Compliance. Priority: High Lead: Police Department, Chief STAPLEE:High Status/Completion: New-Existing/Ongoing Hazards: Pandemic Influenza, Infectious Disease Implementation: Emergency Preparedness Plan Outbreak,Terrorism Est. Cost/Funding Source: TBD/General Fund 10. Outdoor Warning Siren Maintenance. Priority: High Lead: Police Department, Chief STAPLEE:High Status/Completion: New-Existing/Ongoing Hazards: Severe Summer Storms,Tornado, Implementation: Emergency Preparedness Plan Hazmat Est. Cost/Funding Source: TBD/General Fund 11. Debris Management. Priority: High Lead: Public Works, Director STAPLEE:High Status/Completion: New-Existing/Ongoing Hazards: Severe Summer Storms,Tornado, Implementation: Emergency Preparedness Plan Hazmat,Terrorism Est. Cost/Funding Source: TBD/General Fund 12. Rail/Pipeline Safety. Priority: High Lead: Police Department, Chief STAPLEE:High Status/Completion: New-Existing/Ongoing Hazards: Severe Summer Storms,Tornado, Implementation: Emergency Preparedness Plan Hazmat,Terrorism Est. Cost/Funding Source: TBD/General Fund 13. Address civil unrest by ensuring that public building security is in place and providing training and appropriate gear to law enforcement Priority: Status/Completion: New/Ongoing STAPLEE:High Implementation: Emergency preparedness Hazards: Civil Unrest training,work planning and operations Lead: Police Department, Chief Est. Cost/Funding Source: TBD/General Fund 14. Address cybersecurity threats with prevention,detection,and remediation Priority: Status/Completion: New/Ongoing STAPLEE:High Implementation: Emergency preparedness Hazards: Cyber Attack training,work planning and operations Lead: City IT staff Est. Cost/Funding Source: TBD/General Fund Page 200 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 15. Monitor construction,improvements,alterations and development in floodplains Priority: Status/Completion: New/Ongoing STAPLEE:Medium Implementation: Land use authority Hazards: Flooding Est. Cost/Funding Source: TBD/General Fund Lead: City Planning staff 16. Monitor roadway infrastructure in floodplains Priority: Status/Completion: New/Ongoing STAPLEE:Medium Implementation: City public works projects, Hazards: Flooding land use authority Lead: City Public Works staff Est. Cost/Funding Source: TBD/General Fund 17. Ensure Building Code compliance Priority: Status/Completion: New/Ongoing STAPLEE:High Implementation: Code enforcement Hazards: Structural Fire, Collapse Est. Cost/Funding Source: TBD/General Fund Lead: City Planning staff 18. Enforcing Burning Bans Priority: Status/Completion: New/Ongoing STAPLEE:High Implementation: City rule enforcement Hazards: Structural Fire Est. Cost/Funding Source: TBD/General Fund Lead: Police Department, Chief *Reduces risk to buildings or infrastructure **Evaluated a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions;identified actions were selected for implementation Implementation Resources: Table IG.10 identifies Inver Grove Heights resources and roles in implementing its mitigation strategies. Table IG.10: Inver Grove Heights Mitigation Implementation Resources Department,Responsible General Role Processes for Implementing Mitigation Position Strategies Building Inspections, Chief Building inspections, regulation of new Enforce safety restrictions, building Building Official housing development materials, and fire suppression Planning and Zoning,City Zoning,development siting and Floodplain ordinances and compliance Planner restrictions, Comprehensive Plans Police, Police Chief Public safety and law enforcement, Response training, public safety emergency response education Public Works,Public Works Development and operations of public City well inspection and maintenance Director infrastructure(roads, utilities) Fire Department, Chief Public and fire safety enforcement, Inspect commercial structures for fire emergency response hazards Table IG.11 identifies process and ordinance resources. Table IG.11: Inver Grove Heights Additional Implementation Resources Inver Grove Heights Program/Policy/Technical Year Method of incorporation into the hazard Documents adopted/revised mitigation plan Water Supply Plan 2018 Emergency response procedures for staff Sewer Plan 2017 Infrastructure information NPDES Permit 2018 Standards for design,0&M Water Resources Management Plan 2018 Evaluate storm water issues Page 201 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 CITY OF LAKEVILLE Table LK.1: Lakeville Community Data ulydale west Population (2020): 69,640 Mendota St Paul South Mendota St Paul Sunfish Households: 23,265 Heights Lake Employment/Jobs: 15,888 Inver Grove Area: 37.9 Sq. Mi. Eagan Heights Major Land Uses: 30% Ag./Undeveloped 39% Residential Burnsville Apple Rosemount Nininger 14% Park/Recreation Valley Twp Hastings 4% Industrial `odes Ravenna Community Type: Suburban Edge Lak.WHe Empire Twp Vermillion Twp Harahan Twp Undeveloped Area: 30% Farmington Vermillion Twp Source:Metropolitan Council Community Profiles Hampton New Trier Miesville Eureka Twp Castle Rook Two Hazards of Concern Hampton Twp Douglas Twp Lakeville staff evaluated potential hazards of Randolph Twp concern in their community, using the same rating Watertvrd Randolph Twp Sciota model used by Dakota County and other Greenvale Twp Twp participating cities. rmnH`.id Figure LK.1:City of Lakeville Location Table LK.2: Dakota County Hazard Rating Model Parameter Rating=1 Rating=2 Rating=3 Rating=4 Frequency Unlikely:<1%chance in Occasional: 1 to 10% Likely:>10 to<100% Highly Likely:100%chance 100 years chance in next year chance in next year in next year Warning Time More than 12 hours 6-12 hours 3-6 hours None-minimal Extent Localized Community-wide County-wide or greater Likely Impact Negligible Limited Critical Catastrophic Table LK.3: Lakeville Hazard Rating Hazard Frequency Warning Geographic Likely Total Time Extent Impact Civil Unrest 3 3 2 3 11 Cyber Threats 2 4 2 3 11 Violent Winter Storms 2 2 3 3 10 Wildfire 2 4 3 1 10 Violent Summer Storms (e.g.,wind, hail) 2 2 3 2 9 Tornado 2 2 3 2 9 Structural Fire 3 4 1 1 9 Hazardous Material Incidents 2 4 1 2 9 Terrorism 1 4 3 1 9 Extreme Heat or Cold 2 2 2 2 8 Infectious Disease Outbreak/Pandemic 2 1 3 2 8 Flash Flood 1 3 1 2 7 Drought 1 1 3 2 7 Overland Flood (spring snowmelt) 1 1 3 1 6 Water Supply Contamination 1 1 2 1 5 Landslide 1 1 1 1 4 Wastewater Treatment Plant Failure 1 1 2 2 4 Dam Failure 1 1 1 1 4 Page 202 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 General Land Use Figure LK.2 depicts general land use in Lakeville, with agriculture-undeveloped open space and residential being the predominant land uses. 2020 Generalized Land Use Lakeville � 41 :sue �7}71� s,,3At1 II �.I. ,� ��3 +R-' � az" Ina I. :' _ .. �. u }},�rr ' ' i. r'—4 41 )-- 1 IIV.:� rn ` is 1 i , .. . i It' ,. 1/ Cis -T � . 1#r° 1 "--4/iTir.,, ,,,,,,. i-,,e , i r ° -,. r� -:N . _ .:1'' 'I �� a_+� 11.1 v d " Wit{ DE,- 1 Wes^ I. �i - �. -..:i.s' #=�= �- i--- . T r_,TMI :;sir° _ Appr:rrirra-ely 1 rid'='426 mina 2020 Land Use Classes se,*Fenny AnNemrAa ae.,e fem 1 PearSe.lbi Nfa.Q W. hadaeafed Agel[atrwjI ...wax. —lee Cmxl4 Igupdar/ r Fain,... CO...Fru!,waled Ea....e.ce Realm,. ill Iro.daaI end w.m Li^er.wal M.W«wtr... — Cipr arid rp.ndhv gpeed.aes _ «a gyp.. MM.mir 2..tl.A....!r..,.iI in Be...". II.wra, -a..w 9nv.Fan.,....- omw a. e0 u e on........s .ue cemmtrewon........ �fa.r aaci M —R mr J ..d.uwny E aes, .Cc.mnoa a...mp�r Fa. epuxw«tie-sr•e enebpe. -•P5 E•.On.. �.,m «.. El,x..A..se LI - oor.2001 Parcel BeYnLl, ,/� ...a u..ox.s . a m.perc•s.ecmeu. _ei,aae x.c..nn :r.r ..nemo...nnnorr c..mirxn.v. `1 �_=orwi rov ecr.a•i aee.n.etvporen eovrte. e a ex.,ree a ee.e :«.�nG nea.eart Mn,NC.I If^n Figure LK.2:Lakeville Land Use 2020, Metropolitan Council Structural Inventory Value Table LK.4 provides a current total and estimated value for structures in the City of Lakeville. Data are from the Dakota County's Offices of Assessor Services and Geographic Information Services. Structures are identified as residential, commercial, industrial, and agricultural based on associated land uses. "Exempt" includes all buildings not subject to property taxes, such as government buildings, schools, and places of worship. "Utilities" includes fixed sites with infrastructure for electricity, sewer, and water. "Other" includes structures that do not fall into preceding categories. Table LK.4:Structural Inventory and Value,Lakeville Use Type I Land Value Structural Value Total Value Number of Structures Agricultural $89,296,700 $5,215,600 $94,512,300 126 Commercial $238,020,400 $333,369,700 $571,390,100 393 Exempt $168,871,600 $340,789,900 $509,661,500 448 Industrial $115,524,000 $268,247,200 $383,771,200 181 Other $2,178,400 $1,913,400 $4,091,800 4 Residential $2,250,529,000 $6,382,164,700 $8,632,693,700 22,752 Utilities $2,121,000 $5,898,200 $8,019,200 26 TOTAL $2,866,541,100 $7,337,598,700 $10,204,139,800 23,930 Page 203 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Vulnerability Vulnerable Populations Table LK.5 provides current estimates of populations in Lakeville considered by FEMA to be at potentially increased risk during hazard events. Table LK.5: Lakeville Potentially Vulnerable Populations,American Community Survey 2015-2019 Estimates Potentially Vulnerable Lakeville, MN— Population Percentage(%) U.S. (%) U.S. Difference Under Age 5 7.3% 6.1% 0.8% Over Age 65 9.5% 13.7% -4.2% Below Federal Poverty Line 3.9% 13.4% -9.5% Living with a Disability 5.8% 15.6% -9.8% Vulnerability of Critical Assets to Hazards Lakeville staff evaluated potential vulnerabilities of critical facilities to their hazards of concern, provided in Table LK.6. One hazard was identified as non-applicable to critical facilities include: dam failure. Figure LK.3 provides general locations for selected critical assets in Lakeville. Table LK.6: Lakeville Assessment of Critical Assets(Redacted in Public Version of Plan) u c £ O d R C am E O a N O LL 'O O O N C ii E i i L GJ 'O •7 H 2 L E LL H f0 O "O 'i C :� So ~ N y Critical Facilities a`, c - .� .0 �, g o - v c aC, v "n 0 u O N d T O i - L G C6-1 3 C a Gl 2 C 12 O o 0 � 0 W a) Y w m 3 Changes since the 2016 Plan Lakeville staff identified use changes to critical facilities since the plan update in 2016: increase in Senior Care— (the Moments, Beehive, and Kingsley Shores expansion); Expansion of Airlake Airport; additions at three elementary schools; and installation of security fencing at city facility in 2020 Page 204 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Figure LK.3:City of Lakeville—Critical Facilities(Redacted in Public Version of Plan) National Flood Insurance Program Participation and Compliance Table LK.7 includes information on Lakeville's participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Additional information follows about City compliance with the terms of the NFIP. Table LK.7: Lakeville NFIP Participation Current Effective Policies Insurance Community CID Number Map Date In-force In-force Lakeville 270107 12/2/11 63 $17,555,500 Compliance: Compliance is ensured through use of the City's official flood zoning map and enforcement of City Ordinances related to floodplain zones, allowed/prohibited uses, standards, addressing violations, plan review, and inspections. Chapter 101 in City Ordinance and refers to MN Statues chapters 103F and 462. Table LK.8 provides an inventory and assessed value of structures in Lakeville located within the digital flood insurance rate map (DFIRM) boundaries. Structures are listed by predominant land use categories. The table was compiled with data from the Dakota County Office of GIS and Assessor's Office. Page 205 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Table LK.8: Total Floodplain Structure and Value Inventory,Lakeville Structure Type Estimated Land Value Estimated Building Value Total Value Total Structures Commercial $1,489,300 $2,537,700 $4,027,000 3 Exempt $1,548,600 $1,132,700 $2,681,300 8 Industrial $1,563,300 $6,263,500 $7,826,800 5 Residential $33,632,700 $26,706,700 $60,339,400 94 TOTAL $38,233,900 $36,640,600 $74,874,500 110 Strategy Review and Development In 2021, Lakeville staff reviewed their strategies from the 2016 Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan for implementation progress(See Appendix III) and to identify strategies to carry forward into the 2022 Plan update as ongoing efforts or project that have not been completed. City staff considered and addressed FEMA requirements for: 1. A mitigation strategy that identifies and analyzes a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions and projects and further identifies which actions were selected for implementation 2. At least one strategy to reduce risk to buildings and infrastructure City staff also developed new strategies reflective of remaining concerns and vulnerabilities. Table LK.9 lists Lakeville's strategies, with additional information on hazards addressed by the strategy, priority, lead implementation agency, and estimated costs. Table LK.9: Lakeville All-Hazard Mitigation Plan Strategies LAKEVILLE MITIGATION STRATEGIES 1. Develop the Citywide Street Reconstruction Plan.* Priority: First Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Street reconstruction Hazards: Flash Flooding Est. Cost/Funding Source: $3,250,000/CIP Lead: Public Works, Director 2. Conduct Three Echo/Active/Hostile Event Trainings.** Priority: Second Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing Annual STAPLEE: High Training Hazards: All Implementation: Public and new staff training, new Lead: Police Department, Chief training models Est. Cost/Funding Source: Staff Time/Budget 3. Exercise and drill EOC and supervisory staff on storm or transportation accident. Priority: Third Implementation: Emergency Preparedness Plan, STAPLEE: High ongoing review and training with department heads Hazards: All and staff Lead: All City Departments Est. Cost/Funding Source: Dependent Status/Completion: Existing/Annual on scope/Budget, possible UASI funds 4. Storm watershed maintenance. Priority: Fourth Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Department Operations Plan, Hazards: Flash Flood ongoing maintenance as budget permits Lead: Public Works, Director Est. Cost/Funding Source: $10,000/Budget,taxes 5. Shelter planning with local partners. Priority: Fifth Status/Completion: Existing/2012 STAPLEE: High Implementation: Emergency Preparedness Plan Hazards: All Est. Cost/Funding Source: TBD/TBD Lead: Police Department, Chief Page 206 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 6. Provide school programs to youth,focusing on stoves,smoke detectors,fire safety,and evacuation. Priority: Seventh Implementation: Public Education: Elementary, STAPLEE: High Middle school engagement.Annual education and Hazards: Structural Fire(G2: public education) training. Lead: Fire Chiefs Est. Cost/Funding Source: Staff Time/Budget Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing 7. Storm Siren Maintenance. Priority: Ninth Implementation: Emergency Management, Hazards: Severe Summer Storms,Tornado, Hazmat contracted annual maintenance/monitoring Lead: Police, Chief Est. Cost/Funding Source: $8,000/Budget Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing 8. Improve situational awareness and monitoring efforts. Priority: TBD Status/Completion: New/Ongoing Hazards: Civil Unrest Implementation: Operations Lead: Police Department, Chief Est. Cost/Funding Source: TBD/Budget 9. Reduce Risk to City Network Infrastructure and Software Applications. Priority: TBD Status/Completion: New/Ongoing Hazards: Cyber Attack Implementation: Operations Lead: IT, Director Est. Cost/Funding Source: TBD/Budget 10. Continue ongoing staff training in cyber security and new threats. Priority: TBD Status/Completion: New/Ongoing Hazards: Cyber Attack Implementation: Operations Lead: IT, Director Est. Cost/Funding Source: TBD/Budget 11. Build community partnerships to promote timely response. Priority: TBD Status/Completion: New/Ongoing Hazards: Civil Unrest Implementation: Operations Lead: Police Department, Chief Est. Cost/Funding Source: TBD/Budget 12. Increase preparedness training to reduce injuries and damages from civil disturbance. Priority: TBD Status/Completion: New/Ongoing Hazards: Civil Unrest Implementation: Operations Lead: Police Department, Chief Est. Cost/Funding Source: $100,000(2020)/Budget *Reduces risk to buildings or infrastructure **Evaluated a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions;identified actions were selected for implementation Implementation Resources: Table LK.10 identifies staff resources and roles in implementing its mitigation strategies. Table LK.10: Lakeville Mitigation Implementation Resources Department, General Role Processes for Implementing Mitigation Strategies Responsible Position Building Inspections, Building inspections, regulation New and existing building inspections of all buildings within Gene Abbott of new housing development. the city;review of buildings involved in a fire or other events that may comprise structural integrity Planning and Zoning, Zoning,development siting and Ensuring compliance with floodplain ordinances and all Daryl Morey restrictions, Comprehensive applicable federal,state, &city zoning compliance Plans Police,Jeff Long Public safety and law Public Safety Education, training of officers, community enforcement,emergency involvement and training in active shooter/hostile events response Public Works, Develop and operate public City well and water system inspections;road reconstruction Paul Oehme infrastructure(roads, utilities) plans that include updates to storm, water, and sewer systems Page 207 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Department, General Role Processes for Implementing Mitigation Strategies Responsible Position Fire Department, Public and fire safety Annual inspection of high hazard buildings;plan review of Mike Meyer enforcement,emergency all buildings that require fire protection system to ensure response compliance of fire code. Table LK.11 identifies process and ordinance resources. Table LK.11: Lakeville Additional Implementation Resources Lakeville Program/Policy/Technical Year Method of incorporation into Documents adopted/revised the hazard mitigation plan Lakeville Emergency Operations Plan 2020 Action plan for all hazards Capital Improvements Plan 2020 Infrastructure upgrades and repairs Damage Reports/Flooding/2005 and 2010 2010 Reviewed historical data on localized flooding FCC Narrow Banding Requirement 2014 Equipment upgrades to notification system Zoning Ordinances 2020 Reviewed ordinances for hazard planning purposes Page 208 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 CITY OF LILYDALE Table LL.1: Lilydale Community Data El lytlal�j west Population (2020): 809 Mepan St Paul South St Paul Mendota Heights SunFish Households: 543 Lake Employment/Jobs: 362 Inver Grove Area: 0.9 Sq. Mi. Eagan heights Major Land Uses: 49% Park and Rec. 14% Residential Burnsville Apple Rosemount Nininger 4.0% Commercial Valley Twp Hastings Community Type: Suburban `oaten Ravenna: Undeveloped Area: 2.0% I Lakeville Empire Twp Vermillion Twp Harahan Twp Source: Metropolitan Council Community Profiles ' I Farmington Vermillion Twp Hazards of Concern Hampton New Tyler Miesville Eureka Twp Castle Rork Twp Lilydale staff evaluated potential hazards of concern Hampton Twp Douglas Twp in their community, using the same rating model Randolph Tw p used by Dakota County and other participating Waterford Randolph Two SrtOta cities. Greenvale Twp TwP ... tilafflImId Figure LL.1:City of Lilydale Location Table LL.2: Dakota County Hazard Rating Model Parameter Rating=1 Rating=2 Rating=3 Rating=4 Frequency Unlikely:<1%chance in Occasional: Ito 10% Likely:>10 to<100% Highly Likely:100% 100 years chance in next year chance in next year chance in next year Warning Time More than 12 hours 6-12 hours 3-6 hours None-minimal Geographic Extent Localized Community-wide County-wide or greater Likely Impact Negligible Limited Critical Catastrophic Table LL.3: Lilydale Hazard Rating Hazard Frequency Warning Geographic Likely Total Time Extent Impact CyberThreats 4 4 _ 3 3 14 Violent Summer Storms (e.g.,wind, hail) 4 4 _ 2 _ 3 13 Infectious Disease Outbreak/Pandemic 4 2 3 _ 4 13 Civil Unrest 3 4 _ 3 _ 3 13 Tornado 3 _ 4 _ 2 _ 3 12 Flash Flood 3 4 _ 3 _ 2 12 Hazardous Material Incidents 3 4 3 2 12 Terrorism 2 4 3 3 12 Violent Winter Storms 4 2 3 2 11 Water Supply Contamination 1 4 2 4 11 Wastewater Treatment Plant Failure 1 4 2 4 11 Landslide 3 4 1 2 10 Structural Fire 2 4 1 3 10 Drought 3 1 3 2 9 Extreme Heat or Cold 3 1 3 1 8 Overland Flood (spring snowmelt) 3 1 1 2 7 Wildfire 1 3 1 2 7 Dam Failure 1 1 1 2 5 Page 209 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 General Land Use Figure LL. depicts general land use in Lilydale, with park-recreation and residential being the predominant land uses. 2020 Generalized Land Use Lilydale m. mitimormai II =dmii.leibriglIPII..- A ' MI ' —'—h II iffill C.0 . i.r.ML111 9 .r.r....0 F , ,. _... di .. 0 misi =lir Ar irw, irfic / imi . ';,. Liv ilk . ..ipir . 7 mm ii.ii,./- ) •-i. r7rf Ilig.1111 imi LL_voiir " ....,40 , iii,. ..-6. _liot. ''IF I / ,,,:y 0, ii:g. .;',' Ir. Inni -nrii n , / ,- _k - iiwrn_ ,C., ■ MIMI '. P 0::4...-:- / .a., I ., .,.., , ,._ r...., . ./ ., ..... -.. . , ,.,,, / . . . 1111/111 .; IA. ,, ,,, r /,..- ..-...-- ----I-_7///, /r6 . --w- feli"it - .�./ I CAI . R 74 } RIF Apprnxl naEe ly 1 IenIo=0.4238•-Iles 2020 Land Use Classes Slnyl.Far+NY R..d.nfW MWn1wrWY Resfrr.Rpyf WO an AodvabM AQncWf.nd rrr.rp.rt.11m Caa60OLnda 7 -,s,,,e.e 1 9.p.R..4y A.7..n.. 32 craw U.ewwn<.+ M i..k.emN.LM ly 1prwer.4 I I MOO.yew.:, — city and Town aw eoundenes xe,.nen..re.r - ANN., MI M,N Laesrnuta I■EgtraGlree I■craw. -"'" ° 1_Svxami,Demo. Ceam.rw.r M Nun u..o.mnwnr .d Pr* Rrwoen tl mnrr -Wp.i —Roeds_�MI unNi....'.°, 24 ■Re...Oln&C mw.e.iI dr.dWYa.W M•b'k rea.won.Ier.O�er.. L'.E&.dal.o �ti RslIw. - f r., nee. M anummi MI 7.C4o.s. fJ'Mt.. .au .n PevOle sowdary zsi ..ne u.o....a...s l....d A[121Ind,,• ,n ,4 c..ree,, r x..eo .. w.arr.,..,rc .....-n .v ae..wexx o Rama oam rr.m.n nn.etr.,dwnOea.+nes irnernn Re.ances Feu enxk..[.nr.umy Fceeeam. it L.9 t.-P12 c11AN Figure LL.2: Lilydale Land Use 2020, Metropolitan Council Structural Inventory Value Table LL.4 provides a current total and estimated value for structures in the City of Lilydale. Data are from the Dakota County's Offices of Assessor Services and Geographic Information Services. Structures identified as residential, commercial, industrial, and agricultural have the types of structures associated with those land uses. "Exempt" includes all buildings not subject to property taxes, such as government buildings, schools, and places of worship. "Utilities" includes fixed sites with infrastructure for electricity, sewer, and water. "Other" includes structures that do not fall into preceding categories. Table LL.4: Structural Inventory and Value, Lilydale Use Type Land Value Structural Value Total Value Number of Structures Commercial $4,629,500 $8,586,600 $13,216,100 20 Exempt $2,892,700 $262,800 $3,155,500 8 Industrial $725,600 $790,100 $1,515,700 1 Residential $36,248,300 $176,917,900 $213,166,200 66 TOTAL $44,496,100 $186,557,400 $231,053,500 95 Page 210 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Vulnerability Vulnerable Populations Table LL.5 provides current estimates of populations in Lilydale considered by FEMA to be at potentially increased risk during hazard events. Table LL.5: Lilydale Potentially Vulnerable Populations,American Community Survey 2015-2019 Estimates Potentially Vulnerable Percentage(%) U.S. (%) Lilydale, MN— Population U.S. Difference Under Age 5 0.7% 6.1% -5.4% Over Age 65 64.9% 13.7% 51.2% Below Federal Poverty Line 7.0% 13.4% -6.4% Living with a Disability 28.8% 15.6% 13.2% Vulnerability of Critical Assets to Hazards Lilydale staff evaluated potential vulnerabilities of critical facilities to their hazards of concern, provided in Table LL.6. Hazards identified as non-applicable to critical facilities include: dam failure. Figure LL.3 provides general locations for selected critical assets in Lilydale. Table LL.6: Lilydale Assessment of Critical Assets(Redacted in Public Version of Plan) IJ C £ O G1 c C L aC Oy+ ii O E ate+ O £ v' +•+ Gl :6, N •u O 8 y C U- N i7 y1 .0 W i O 'y C :� so F L Critical Facilities C Y — c v c o -o 'o H E C V f0 Gl •V1 �' f6 i i Vf = LL 3 C 3 ~ lJ X J (J y Vf 0 W u a v m c 3 Changes since the 2016 Plan Lilydale representatives identified no significant use changes to critical facilities since the plan update in 2016. Page 211 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Figure LL.3:City of Lilydale—Critical Facilities(Redacted in Public Version of Plan) National Flood Insurance Program Participation and Compliance Table LL.7 includes information on Lilydale's participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Additional information follows about City compliance with the terms of the NFIP. Table LL.7: Lilydale NFIP Participation Current Effective Policies Insurance Community CID Number Map Date In-force In-force Lilydale 275241 12/2/11 5 $1,811,200 Compliance: Compliance is ensured through Floodplain Ordinance review and enforcement per contracted city planner. Table LL.8 provides an inventory and assessed value of structures in Lilydale located within the digital flood insurance rate map (DFIRM) boundaries. Structures are listed by predominant land use categories. The table was compiled with data from the Dakota County Office of GIS and Assessor's Office. Table LL.8: Total Floodplain Structure and Value Inventory,Lilydale Structure Type Estimated Land Value Estimated Building Value Total Value Total Structures Commercial $323,500 $522,500 $846,000 3 Exempt $270,100 $0 $270,100 8 TOTAL $593,600 $522,500 $1,116,100 11 Page 212 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Strategy Review and Development In 2021, Lilydale representatives reviewed their strategies from the 2016 Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan for implementation progress (See Appendix III) and to identify strategies to carry forward into the 2022 Plan update as ongoing efforts or project that have not been completed. City staff considered and addressed FEMA requirements for: 1. A mitigation strategy that identifies and analyzes a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions and projects and further identifies which actions were selected for implementation 2. At least one strategy to reduce risk to buildings and infrastructure City staff also developed new strategies reflective of remaining concerns and vulnerabilities. Table LL.9 lists the City's strategies, with additional information on hazards addressed by the strategy, priority, lead implementation agency, and estimated costs. Table LL.9: Lilydale All-Hazard Mitigation Plan Strategies LILYDALE MITIGATION STRATEGIES 1. Implement and maintain Stormwater Management Plan.* Priority: High Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing STAPLEE:High Implementation: Ordinances, PUD Requirements Hazards: Flash Flooding Est. Cost/Funding Source: $1,000/Property Lead: City Engineer,City Administration Owners, Budget 2. Promote recycling of household hazardous waste at the County Recycling Zone Priority: Medium Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing STAPLEE:High Implementation: Information provided from City Hazards: Hazmat Incident Staff, public safety representatives Lead: City Administrator Est. Cost/Funding Source: $1,000 yearly/Budget 3. Educate the public on enrolling in reverse 911 services. Priority: Medium Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE:High Implementation: Public information in city Hazards: All newsletter Lead: City Administrator Est. Cost/Funding Source: $200 yearly/Budget 4. Enhance computer security and data recovery. Priority: High Status/Completion: Ongoing STAPLEE:High Implementation: Contracted review Hazards: Cyber Attack Est. Cost/Funding Source: $1,000/Budget Lead: City Administrator 5. Implement storm sewer management project to increase capacity and direct flow. Priority: High Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing STAPLEE:High Implementation: Project Plan Hazards: Flash Flood, Overland Flood Est. Cost/Funding Source: TBD/Budget Lead: City Engineer,City Administrator 6. Manage surface water runoff. Priority: High Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing STAPLEE:High Implementation: Ordinance evaluation and Hazards: Flooding, Landslide implementation Lead: City Engineer,City Administrator Est. Cost/Funding Source: $37,000/Budget 7. Create evacuation plan for City facilities. Priority: High Status/Completion: New/Est. Dec. 2022 STAPLEE:TBD Implementation: Needs evaluation Hazards: Civil Unrest Est. Cost/Funding Source: $5,000/Budget Lead: with Mendota Heights Police Dept., Chief** Page 213 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 8. Conduct tabletop exercises. Priority: High Status/Completion: New/Est.April 2022 STAPLEE:TBD Implementation: Training program Hazards: Civil Unrest Est. Cost/Funding Source: $1,000/Budget Lead: City Engineer,with Mendota Heights Police Dept.,Chief** 9. Secure City Facilities(e.g.,fencing). Priority: High Status/Completion: New/Est.2022 STAPLEE:TBD Implementation: Assessment and project Hazards: Civil Unrest development Lead: Public Works(through Mendota Heights)** Est. Cost/Funding Source: TBD/Budget *Reduces risk to buildings or infrastructure **Mendota Heights provides Police,Fire,and Public Works services to Lilydale Implementation Resources: Table LL.10 identifies staff resources and roles in implementing its mitigation strategies.Table LL.11 identifies process and ordinance resources. Table LL.10: Lilydale Mitigation Implementation Resources Department,Responsible General Role Processes for Implementing Mitigation Position Strategies Building Inspections-contract Building inspections, regulation of Enforce safety restrictions including setbacks, new housing development building materials,fire suppression systems Planning/Zoning/Engineer Zoning, development siting and Floodplain ordinances and compliance contracted restrictions,Comprehensive Plans Police, Police Chief(contracted Public safety, law enforcement, Response training,public safety education to Mendota Heights) emergency response Public Works,City Engineer, Develop and operate public City well inspection and maintenance contracted infrastructure(roads, utilities) Fire Department, Fire Chief Public-fire safety enforcement, Inspect commercial structures for fire hazards (Mendota Heights) emergency response City Council Establish policy,enact budget Budget allocations or plan initiatives City Administration Decision-support for Council,City Annual budgeting, work planning, and operations reporting processes Table LL.11: Lilydale Additional Implementation Resources Lilydale Program/Policy/Technical Year Method of incorporation into the hazard mitigation Documents adopted/revised plan Sets land use vision for community, provides existing Comprehensive Plan 2020 and projected information Establishes standards for runoff controls for new Surface Water Management Plan 2018 developments/redevelopments Zoning Ordinances Multiple Establishes standards for development Building Code Ongoing City utilizes State Building Code Minnesota Uniform Fire Code Ongoing City utilizes State Fire Code Page 214 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 CITY OF MENDOTA Table M.1: Mendota Community Data Population (2020): 183 lilydsle we, M=ndut� 5t Paul South r Iindota St Paul Households: 78 Height, Ulu Employment/Jobs: 64 Inver Grove Area: 0.3 Sq. Mi. Eagan Heights Major Land Uses: 31% Park and Rec. 26% Residential Burnsville ARPI° Roumna nt Frininger 16% Ag./Undeveloped "a`!`" Twp Hastings Coates Community Type: Suburban I Ravenna Lakeville Empire Twp Vermillion p Twp Undeveloped Area: 16% kRe Shan Tw Source: Metropolitan Council Community Profiles Farmington Vermillion Twp Hampton New Trler MIesVIiie Hazards of Concern Eureka Twp Castle Rock Twp Hampton Twp meg!aa Twp Mendota representatives evaluated potential Ra nd oI ph Twp hazards of concern in their community, using the Waterford Randolph iwp Scioto same rating model used by Dakota County and Greanvale lwp Twp other participating cities. Nwt^"'° Figure M.1:City of Mendota Location Table M.2: Dakota County Hazard Rating Model Parameter Rating=1 Rating=2 Rating=3 Rating=4 Frequency Unlikely:<1%chance in Occasional: Ito 10% Likely:>10 to<100% Highly Likely:100% 100 years chance in next year chance in next year chance in next year Warning Time More than 12 hours 6-12 hours 3-6 hours None-minimal Geographic Extent Localized Community-wide County-wide or greater Likely Impact Negligible Limited Critical Catastrophic Table M.3: Mendota Hazard Rating Hazard Frequency Warning Geographic Likely Total Time Extent Impact Infectious Disease Outbreak/Pandemic 4 2 4 4 14 Violent Summer Storms (e.g., wind, hail) 4 3 3 3 13 Civil Unrest 3 4 3 3 13 Tornado 3 3 3 3 12 Flash Flood 3 3 3 3 12 Wildfire 2 4 2 4 12 Landslide 3 4 1 4 12 Hazardous Material Incidents 2 4 3 2 11 Terrorism 1 4 3 3 11 Violent Winter Storms 3 2 3 2 10 Drought 3 1 3 3 10 Structural Fire 2 4 1 3 10 Extreme Heat or Cold 2 1 3 2 8 Water Supply Contamination 1 4 1 2 8 Wastewater Treatment Plant Failure 1 4 1 2 8 Cyber Threats 1 4 1 1 7 Overland Flood (spring snowmelt) 2 1 1 2 6 Dam Failure 1 1 1 1 4 Page 215 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 General Land Use Figure M.2 depicts general land 2020 Generalized Land Use use in Mendota, with park- Mendota recreation and residential being i • ..' the predominant land uses. .7:7 /'./ / Structural Inventory - Value � -� � / ' Table M.4 provides a current := - ' total and estimated value for _ _.,- structures in the City of , Mendota. i"' ..„------- --- ------I Data are from the Dakota 1 -: County's Offices of Assessor ` ° �.i Services and Geographic L '' Information Services. Structures identified as _ residential, commercial, industrial, and agricultural have the types of structures associated with those land uses. "Exempt" includes all buildings III not subject to property taxes, Sri such as government buildings, . schools, and places of worship. Apeallmetely 1 frclh•0132416 miles "Utilities" includes fixed sites 2020 Land Use Classes ❑ mo with infrastructure for "'"'" "°"'' N";" A "�use Re.°,rb,l r Al,auea I-7 o. -° " isi electricity, sewer, and water. *rwr.., ;..,. MI.,..".. •'.a ,I.aaa,tm,.o,. I. .,,,,.a,..3 IM Re..ra.M.. �.. "Other" includes structures that e o De M Noma. M G'0wi°° do not fall into precedingLS 7 ry a°�md>,ry --ah*tear enro 6°�.J.... —made ti--r Reiene�y eareei eoumory categories. ,..„..,.,.° �,�� arm �rmm xE„� ,:•. Figure M.2: Mendota Land Use 2020, Metropolitan Council Table M.4:Structural Inventory and Value,Mendota Use Type Land Value 1 Structural Value Total Value Number of Structures Commercial $839,300 1 $2,221,600 $3,060,900 10 Exempt $1,309,300 $1,713,900 $3,023,200 12 Industrial $652,200 $1,468,400 $2,120,600 5 Other $256,900 $122,000 $378,900 2 Residential $11,825,400 $25,955,000 $37,780,400 124 TOTAL $14,883,100 $31,480,900 $46,364,000 153 Page 216 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Vulnerability Vulnerable Populations Table M.5 provides current estimates of populations in Mendota considered by FEMA to be at potentially increased risk during hazard events. Table M.5: Mendota Potentially Vulnerable Populations,American Community Survey 2015-2019 Estimates Potentially Vulnerable o Mendota, MN— Population Percentage(/o) U.S. (%) U.S. Difference Under Age 5 5.1% 6.1% -1.0% Over Age 65 15.3% 13.7% 1.6% Below Federal Poverty Line 10.9% 13.4% -2.5% Living with a Disability 13.4% 15.6% -2.2% Vulnerability of Critical Assets to Hazards Mendota staff evaluated potential vulnerabilities of critical facilities to their hazards of concern, provided in Table M.6. Figure M.3 provides general locations for selected critical assets in Mendota. Table M.6: Mendota Assessment of Critical Assets(Redacted in Public Version of Plan c 0 N N .0 £ a, c v.) it 4E O a.+ O' v r al -0 0 el d 0 ii '6_ 0 i E. Li E i i L d 7 '06 11l 2 u c 21 o o c ;4 to 1- t Critical Facilities E c r - s c 3 u c 2 'a_ 'o a LL L _ E c r, H 2 E fa 3 '` a al F > > O i c6 � c n R LL C w = > U X p v y = O C .- 0 W O CU > MI Changes since the 2016 Plan Mendota representatives identified no significant changes to critical facilities since the plan update in 2016. Page 217 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Figure M.3:City of Mendota—Critical Facilities(Redacted in Public Version of Plan National Flood Insurance Program Participation and Compliance Table M.7 includes information on Mendota's participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Additional information follows about City compliance with the terms of the NFIP. Table M.7: Mendota NFIP Participation Current Effective ' Policies Insurance Community CID Number Map Date In-force In-force Mendota 270109 12/2/11 - - Compliance: Compliance is ensured through use of the City's official flood zoning map and enforcement of City Ordinances related to floodplain zones, allowed/prohibited uses, standards, and addressing violations: Ordinance 809.01. GIS analyses revealed no floodplain structures in Mendota. The table was compiled with data from the Dakota County Office of GIS and Assessor's Office. Table M.8: Total Floodplain Structure and Value Inventory,Mendota Structure Type Total Structures Estimated Land Value Estimated Building Value Total Value TOTAL 0 $0 $0 $0 Page 218 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Strategy Review and Development In 2021, Mendota representatives reviewed their strategies from the 2016 Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan for implementation progress (See Appendix III) and to identify strategies to carry forward into the 2022 Plan update as ongoing efforts or projects that have not been completed. City staff considered and addressed FEMA requirements for: 1. A mitigation strategy that identifies and analyzes a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions and projects and further identifies which actions were selected for implementation 2. At least one strategy to reduce risk to buildings and infrastructure City staff also developed new strategies reflective of remaining concerns and vulnerabilities. Table M.9 lists Mendota's strategies,with additional information on hazards addressed by the strategy, priority, lead implementation agency, and estimated costs. Table M.9: Mendota All-Hazard Mitigation Plan Strategies MENDOTA MITIGATION STRATEGIES 1. Enforce-maintain stormwater management ordinances. STAPLEE: 9 Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing Hazards: Erosion control Implementation: Local Ordinance Lead: Community Development Est. Cost/Funding Source: Staff Time/City Budget 2. Continue sanitary sewer management. STAPLEE: 13 Implementation: Sewer Maintenance Schedule Hazards: Sewer back-ups Est. Cost/Funding Source: $6,000 yearly/City Lead: City Council, City Clerk Budget Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing 3. Continue stormwater pond maintenance. STAPLEE: 10 Implementation: Pond Maintenance Schedule Hazards: Flash Flood Est. Cost/Funding Source: $1,000 yearly/City Lead: Park Commissioner Budget Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing 4. Water main loop completion and expansion. STAPLEE: 19 Status/Completion: New/Ongoing Hazards: Water Supply Contamination, Flood, Implementation: Water Main Project Drought Est. Cost/Funding Source: $4.3 M/Bond/Grants Lead: City contractor 5. Erosion control for bluffs. STAPLEE: 16 Status/Completion: New/Ongoing Hazards: Landslide Implementation: Erosion control strategies Lead: TBD Est. Cost/Funding Source: TBD/TBD 7. Create evacuation plan for City facilities. Priority: High Status/Completion: New/Est. Dec. 2022 STAPLEE:TBD Implementation: Needs evaluation Hazards: Civil Unrest Est. Cost/Funding Source: $5,000/Budget Lead: with Mendota Heights Police Dept., Chief 8. Conduct tabletop exercises. Priority: High Status/Completion: New/Est.April 2022 STAPLEE:TBD Implementation: Training program Hazards: Civil Unrest Est. Cost/Funding Source: $1,000/Budget Lead: City Engineer,with Mendota Heights Police Dept.,Chief*** 9. Secure City Facilities(e.g.,fencing). Priority: High Status/Completion: New/Est. 2022 STAPLEE:TBD Implementation: Assessment and project Hazards: Civil Unrest development Lead: Public Works(through Mendota Heights)*** Est. Cost/Funding Source: TBD/Budget Page 219 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 *Reduces risk to buildings or infrastructure **Evaluated a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions;identified actions were selected for implementation Implementation Resources: Table M.10 identifies staff resources and roles in implementing its mitigation strategies. Table M.10: Mendota Mitigation Implementation Resources Department,Responsible Processes for Implementing Mitigation General Role Position Strategies Building Inspections,contracted, Building inspections, regulation of new Enforce safety restrictions including (A to Z Inspection, Mike Andrejka) housing development. setbacks, building materials, and fire suppression Planning/Zoning,City Council/ Zoning,development siting and Floodplain Planning Commission restrictions, Comprehensive Plans ordinances and compliance Police, Mendota Heights, Chief Public safety, law enforcement, Response training,public safety emergency response education Public Works,city sewer contract Development and operations of public City well inspection and maintenance (McDonough) infrastructure(roads, utilities) Fire Department, Mendota Public-fire safety enforcement, Inspect commercial structures for fire Heights, Chief emergency response hazards City Council Establish policy, enact budget Budget allocations or plan initiatives City Administration Decision-support for County,City Evaluation of alternative,project operations identification Table M.11 identifies process and ordinance resources. Table M.11: Mendota Additional Implementation Resources Mendota Program/Policy/Technical Year Method of incorporation into the hazard mitigation plan Documents adopted/revised Storm Water Management Plan 2021 Flood Management Reference Emergency Preparedness Plan 2021 Hazard ID and Ranking Comprehensive Sewer Plan 2021 Infrastructure improvement information Mitigation Plan and Comp Plan support one another through 2040 Comprehensive plan 2021 sharing consistent objectives in the area of reducing the impacts of known hazards. City Code Chapter 805,Sec 3-Soil 2020 Review control measures to protect exposed slopes. Erosion and Sedimentation Control City Code Chapter 8,Sec 2-Zoning 2021 Reviewed to ensure consistent floodplain management Districts objectives. Page 220 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Table MH.1: Mendota Heights Community Data lydale e4l Population (2020): 11,744 Mendot tPaul South St Paul ndota Sunfish Households: 4,787 Heights `Luke Employment/Jobs: 10,503 Inver Grove Area: 10.0 Sq. Mi. Eagan Heights Major Land Uses: 37% Residential 21% Park and Rec. Burnsville Apple Feininger 9% Vafley Ra semnunt Institutional Twp Hastings Community Type: Suburban CoatesI Ravenna Undeveloped Area: 6% Lakeville Empire Twp vrr IIIFan Marshan Twp Twp Source: Metropolitan Council Community Profiles Farmington Vermillion Twp Hampton New Trier Miesville Hazards of Concern Eureka Twp Castle Rock Twp Mendota Heights staff evaluated potential hazards Hampton Twp Doug,as Twp of concern in their community, using the same I Randolph Twp Waterford Randolph rating model used by Dakota County and other Greenvale Twp Twp ' S=iota participating cities. Twp Figure MH.1:City of Mendota Heights Location Table MH.2: Dakota County Hazard Rating Model Parameter Rating=1 Rating=2 Rating=3 Rating=4 Frequency Unlikely:<1%chance in Occasional: 1 to 10% Likely:>10 to<100% Highly Likely:100% 100 years chance in next year chance in next year chance in next year Warning Time More than 12 hours 6-12 hours 3-6 hours None-minimal Geographic Extent Localized Community-wide County-wide or greater Likely Impact Negligible Limited Critical Catastrophic Table MH.3: Mendota Heights Hazard Rating Hazard Frequency Warning Geographic Likely Total Time Extent Impact Infectious Disease Outbreak/Pandemic 4 2 4 4 14 Cyber Threats 4 4 3 3 14 Violent Summer Storms (e.g., wind, hail) 4 4 2 3 13 Terrorism 2 4 3 3 13 Civil Unrest 3 4 3 3 13 Tornado 3 4 2 3 12 Flash Flood 3 3 3 2 11 Hazardous Material Incidents 3 4 2 2 11 Water Supply Contamination 1 4 2 4 11 Wastewater Treatment Plant Failure 1 4 2 4 11 Violent Winter Storms 3 2 3 2 10 Wildfire 3 4 1 1 9 Landslide 3 3 1 2 9 Structural Fire 3 4 1 1 9 Drought 3 1 3 1 8 Extreme Heat or Cold 3 1 3 1 8 Overland Flood (spring snowmelt) 3 1 1 2 7 Dam Failure 1 1 1 1 4 Page 221 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 General Land Use Figure MH.2 depicts general 2020 Generalized Land Ilse land use in Mendota Heights, Mendota Heights -line---- -a sir-7_a.—• ===_3! ^..a with park-recreation and =m ► .l _:111._ ." I �En�mow= :■:., fMl incur- �rilii i+ice ... residential being the 0 IDal:a nm..C■C �..lr :: i _ �� predominant land uses. ............. .i � -lt �A le': ( 4 Structural Inventory t':. Ai.-- - P�• ;; ;. .. + I • �w r �"� Value . : m- Table MH.4 provides a current w;`1 l� �°yrromil -4 / t g.= total and estimated value for �2. structures in the City of ,._. ,_ Mendota Heights. ,\._9, 4;5 Data are from the DakotaArt �� --�- ° �� County s Offices of Assessor /--`-_---J -" . ;: •ai i Services and Geographic r a \\ /4 'r� Information Services. ' 'I N A r o Structures identified as ' r Z� �' - —erm 4,4 _,.1,170t residential, commercial, // ` jL f ipwr.N11$ industrial, and agricultural have / the types of structures [R. 4 Lnina associated with those land uses. {, �■ ■ . _■ yi 1 'Ii - "Exempt" includes all buildings \�-- '--' — _` , . not subject to property taxes, / 1 � �. ., such as government buildings, �=� r+urf� A➢p xirra[er 'mcn_3.6.K246 rill¢" schools, and places of worship. 2020 Land use Classes ❑ SIeyl.Fk. R..k,r.W lArre..tr R..,d.aar Akavru.. rnar miI AIM1uF6., rRIMIN dra. "Utilities" includes fixed sites I m=z ®a�d.l.,l1.n.�.�..ed ea M.L.R0,74.,1. I■ #�.i.= Ej =d.. M R.uci Hgixar »x .cm+ -r,.,nmmh I...re rx+ �..rt• M',v.', with infrastructure for m .5 .Ji M MP. electricity, sewer, and water. �aa """'�' ' u' D "Other" includes structures that n"'CauNyyewMnry •ct pN T y M1p 9.drdurbr —Ram —R.iMay parral Bwndery do not fall into preceding ,,, „ x= c,x� r ;r_I categories. Figure MH.2: Mendota Heights Land Use 2020, Metropolitan Council Table MH.4:Structural Inventory and Value,Mendota Heights Use Type Land Value Structural Value Total Value Number of Structures Commercial $62,021,100 1 $146,393,900 $208,415,000 121 Exempt $95,295,100 $110,461,800 $205,756,900 221 Industrial _ $45,251,600 $122,088,700 $167,340,300 51 Other _ $108,300 $350,500 $458,800 3 Residential _ $551,922,900 $1,569,623,900 $2,121,546,800 4,362 Utilities $3,119,800 $11,902,400 $15,022,200 62 TOTAL $757,718,800 $1,960,821,200 $2,718,540,000 4,820 Page 222 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Vulnerability Vulnerable Populations Table MH.5 provides current estimates of populations in Mendota Heights considered by FEMA to be at potentially increased risk during hazard events. Table MH.5: Mendota Heights Potentially Vulnerable Populations,American Community Survey 2015-2019 Estimates Potentially Vulnerable Mendota Heights, MN— Population Percentage (%) U.S. (%) U.S. Difference Under Age 5 5.0% 6.1% -1.1% Over Age 65 26.0% 13.7% 12.3% Below Federal Poverty Line 5.0% 13.4% -8.4% Living with a Disability 9.4% 15.6% -4.2% Vulnerability of Critical Assets to Hazards Mendota Heights staff evaluated potential vulnerabilities of critical facilities to their hazards of concern, provided in Table MH.6. Figure MH.3 provides general locations for selected critical assets in Mendota Heights. Table MH.6: Mendota Heights Assessment of Critical Assets(Redacted in Public Version of Plan) C 0 .Y a £ 4/ Vi c Ku' Q ., a 0 LL 72 8 8 N C LL £ L L . Ql L Critical Facilities a`, L - s 17' c o -Q c a, 12 + T f0 N LL V 0 r f0 J T g m 3 w N O w a) N Changes since the 2016 Plan Mendota Heights staff identified use changes to critical facilities since the plan update in 2016: • New sports complex and swimming pool at Two Rivers High School • New extended stay hotel near 494. Page 223 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Figure MH.3:City of Mendota Heights—Critical Facilities(Redacted in Public Version of Plan) National Flood Insurance Program Participation and Compliance Table MH.7 includes information on Mendota Heights' participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Additional information follows about City compliance with the terms of the NFIP. Table MH.7: Mendota Heights NFIP Participation Current Effective Policies Insurance Community CID Number Map Date In-force In-force Mendota Heights 270110 2/8/1974 9 $2,828,000 Compliance: Compliance is ensured through the City of Mendota Heights Title 12 Zoning Chapter 3, Critical Area, and Title 12 Zoning Chapter 7, Flood Plain Management.These encompass use of the City official flood zoning map; prohibited, conditional, and allowed uses in the floodway and flood fringe; and required procedures and standards. Table MH.8 provides an inventory and assessed value of structures in Mendota Heights located within the digital flood insurance rate map (DFIRM) boundaries. Structures are listed by predominant land use categories. The table was compiled with data from the Dakota County Office of GIS and Assessor's Office. Page 224 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Table MH.8: Total Floodplain Structure and Value Inventory,Mendota Heights Structure Type Estimated Land Value Estimated Building Value Total Value Total Structures Exempt $740,300 $70,900 $811,200 25 TOTAL $740,300 $70,900 $811,200 25 Strategy Review and Development In 2016, Mendota Heights representatives reviewed their strategies from the 2011 Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan for implementation progress (See Appendix III),and to identify strategies to carry forward into the 2016 Plan update as ongoing efforts or project that have not been completed. City staff considered and addressed FEMA requirements for: 1. A mitigation strategy that identifies and analyzes a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions and projects and further identifies which actions were selected for implementation 2. At least one strategy to reduce risk to buildings and infrastructure City staff also developed new strategies reflective of remaining concerns and vulnerabilities. Table MH.9 lists Mendota Heights' strategies, with additional information on hazards addressed by the strategy, priority, lead implementation agency, and estimated costs. Table MH.9: Mendota Heights All-Hazard Mitigation Plan Strategies MENDOTA HEIGHTS MITIGATION STRATEGIES 1. Remodel/build Police Department spaces to develop a useable Emergency Operations Center.* Priority: High Status/Completion: Existing/Fire Station completed STAPLEE: Medium 2021 Hazards: All Implementation: Council Approval,CIP Lead: City Administrator Est. Cost/Funding Source: $10 Million/Bonding 2. Conduct a comprehensive review of All Hazard Mitigation Plan every five years.** Priority: Med Status/Completion: Ongoing/2021 STAPLEE: High Implementation: Emergency Preparedness Plan Hazards: All Est. Cost/Funding Source: $2,000/Budget Lead: Emergency Manager 3. Monitor MANPADS sites.* Priority: Med Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Emergency Preparedness Plan, Hazards: Terrorism monitor development, new construction (2021) Lead: Police Department, Chief Est. Cost/Funding Source: Staff Time/Budget 4. Line sanitary sewers for infiltration and inflow management. Priority: High Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Capital Improvement Program, Hazards: Flash Flood monitoring(2021) Lead: Public Works, Director Est. Cost/Funding Source: $200,000/Budget 5. Continue NIMS training for EOP staff. Priority: High Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Emergency Preparedness Plan, Hazards: All continued tabletop exercises Lead: Police, Fire departments(Chiefs),city staff Est. Cost/Funding Source: Staff Time/Budget 6. Replace outdoor warning sirens. Priority: High Status/Completion: Existing/ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Emergency Preparedness Plan Hazards: Severe Storms,Tornado, Hazmat Incident Est. Cost/Funding Source: $77,000/City,County Lead: Police Department, Chief funds Page 225 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 7. Clean and expand storm water ponds. Priority: Low Status/Completion: Existing-New/2050 STAPLEE: Medium Implementation: Council Approval,CIP Hazards: Flash Flood,Severe Storms Est. Cost/Funding Source: $5 Million/Grants, Lead: Public Works, Director Budget 8. Create a shared database of§302 facilities. Priority: High Status/Completion: Existing-New/2017 STAPLEE: High Implementation: Emergency Preparedness Plan Hazards: Hazmat Incident Est. Cost/Funding Source: $2,000/Budget Lead: Emergency Manager 9. Expand wildfire education and mitigation. Priority: Low Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing STAPLEE: Medium Implementation: Emergency Preparedness Plan, Hazards: Wildfire monitoring Lead: Fire Department, Chief Est. Cost/Funding Source: $1,500/Budget 10. Provide landslide prevention and education. Priority: Med Status/Completion: Existing-New/Ongoing annually STAPLEE: High Implementation: Emergency Preparedness Plan Hazards: Landslide Est. Cost/Funding Source: $3,000/Budget Lead: City Planner 11. Provide public education on reverse 911 service registration. Priority: High Status/Completion: New/Ongoing annually STAPLEE: High Implementation: Emergency Preparedness Plan, List Hazards: All, notification maintenance Lead: Police Chief, Fire Chief, Comm. Dir. Est. Cost/Funding Source: $5,000/Budget 12. Create evacuation plans. Priority: High Status/Completion: New/Dec 2022 STAPLEE: High Implementation: Conduct needs evaluation Hazards: Civil Unrest Est. Cost/Funding Source: $5,000/Budget Lead: Police Chief 13. Conduct tabletop exercises. Priority: High Status/Completion: New/Ongoing STAPLEE: Medium Implementation: Training program Hazards: Civil Unrest Est. Cost/Funding Source: $1,000/Budget Lead: Police Chief 14. Secure City Facilities(e.g.,fencing). Priority: High Status/Completion: New/June2022 STAPLEE: Medium Implementation: Engineering Project Hazards: Civil Unrest Est. Cost/Funding Source: $5,000/Budget Lead: Public Works, Director *Reduces risk to buildings or infrastructure ** Evaluated a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions;identified actions were selected for implementation Implementation Resources: Table MH.10 identifies staff resources and roles in implementing its mitigation strategies. Table MH.10: Mendota Heights Mitigation Implementation Resources Department,Responsible General Role Processes for Implementing Mitigation Position Strategies Building Inspections: Building inspections, regulation of new Enforce safety restrictions. E.g.,setbacks, contracted inspector housing development building materials, and fire suppression Planning/Zoning/Engineer: Zoning, development siting and Floodplain ordinances and compliance City Planner restrictions,Comprehensive Plans Page 226 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Department,Responsible General Role Processes for Implementing Mitigation Position Strategies Police: Police Chief Public safety, law enforcement, emergency Response training,public safety education response Public Works: Director Development and operations of public Ongoing inspection and maintenance infrastructure(roads, utilities) Fire Department: Fire Chief Public-fire safety enforcement,emergency Inspect commercial structures for fire response hazards City Council Establish policy,enact budget Budget allocations or plan initiatives City Administration Decision-support for Council,City Evaluation of alternative,project operations identification Table MH.11 identifies process and ordinance resources. Table MH.11: Mendota Heights Additional Implementation Resources Mendota Heights Year Program/Policy/Technical adopted/ Method of incorporation into the hazard mitigation plan Documents revised Comprehensive Plan 2020 Sets land use vision, provides existing and projected information Capital Improvement Plan Annually Ensures equipment necessary to carry out essential functions Emergency Preparedness Plan 2010 Develops mitigation, response and recovery plans Street Improvement Plan 2010 Assesses condition of public rights of way,schedule reconstruction Storm Water Management Ordinance 2009 Establishes standards for runoff controls for all new developments and redevelopments Floodplain Management Ordinance 2011 (ant.) Will adopt new FEMA flood maps and ordinance language Zoning Ordinance 2010 Establishes standards for development Building Code Ongoing City utilizes the State Building Code Minnesota Uniform Fire Code Ongoing City utilizes the State Fire Code Page 227 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 CITY OF MIESVILLE Table MS.1: Miesville Community Data LIFO ate west Population (2020): 138 Mendota_ St Pail St Paul Mendota He Sunfish Households: 57 lake Employment/Jobs: 79 Inver Grove Area: 1.7 Sq. Mi. Eagan Heights Major Land Uses: 90% Ag./ Undeveloped 6% Residential Burnsville Apple I\ Rosemountninger • 1% Commercial Valley Twp Hastings Community Type: Diversified Rural Coates Ravenna Undeveloped Area: 90% Lakeville Empire Twp vermillion Twp Marshan Twp i Source: Metropolitan Council Community Profiles Vermillion Twp Farmington Hazards of Concern Hampton New Trier Eureka Imp Castle Rack Twp we' Miesville representatives evaluated potential Hampton Twp Douglas Twp hazards of concern in their community, using the Randolph Twp same rating model used by Dakota County and Waterford Randolph_ - other participating cities. Greenvale Twp Twp Sdntpa •Tw 2'44rsulnrsa.N.bW1.taep .nod a..rvneMCI x no nien rn.mri.m w.vn .ernnan w:ir Y.a7+anr.cm.dm.a Figure MS.1:City of Miesville Location Table MS.2: Dakota County Hazard Rating Model Parameter Rating=1 Rating=2 Rating=3 Rating=4 Frequency Unlikely:<1%chance in Occasional: Ito 10% Likely:>10 to<100% Highly Likely:100%chance in 100 years chance in next year chance in next year next year Warning Time More than 12 hours 6-12 hours 3-6 hours None-minimal Extent Localized Community-wide County-wide or greater Likely Impact Negligible Limited Critical Catastrophic Table MS.3: Miesville Hazard Rating Hazard Frequency Warning Geographic Likely Total Time Extent Impact Tornado 4 4 2 3 13 Violent Winter Storms 4 4 2 3 13 Water Supply Contamination 3 4 2 4 13 Violent Summer Storms (e.g., wind, hail) 4 4 2 2 12 Extreme Heat or Cold 4 2 3 3 12 Structural Fire 4 4 1 3 12 Flash Flood 4 4 2 1 11 Overland Flood (spring snowmelt) 4 4 2 1 11 Hazardous Material Incidents 2 4 2 3 11 Infectious Disease Outbreak/Pandemic 4 1 3 3 11 Terrorism 1 4 3 3 11 Drought 4 1 3 2 10 Cyber Threats 1 4 3 2 10 Civil Unrest 1 2 3 3 9 Dam Failure 1 1 3 4 9 Wastewater Treatment Plant Failure 1 1 3 1 6 Wildfire 1 1 1 1 4 Landslide 1 1 1 1 4 Page 228 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 General Land Use Figure MS.2 depicts general 2020 Generalized Land Use land use in Miesville,with park- Miesville recreation and residential being the predominant land uses. - Structural Inventory Value Table MS.4 provides a current total and estimated value for i structures in the City of i Miesville. • -- - i Data are from the Dakota County's Offices of AssessorLA Services and Geographic Information Services. Structures identified as residential, commercial, industrial, and agricultural have I the types of structures associated with those land uses. "Exempt" includes all buildings not subject to property taxes, ._,_, -•- _ __m such as government buildings, schools, and places of worship. I 2ppr.irrw.loly 1 irtih=0 216066 miles "Utilities" includes fixed sites 2020 Land Use Classes ii with infrastructure for iF ""w"°" o is r",". Lt.. �"wr==l��u Dee.AIWY7 .10ssse I=wa...�e",M„ MI r,.r:.m, i M rt11M rdov. r,1. ..,: R...,.,. electricity, sewer, and water. =.gleFa-Jy0ebaw .y M,a.k.",,, . Pa,,,„,l•„a,am,, 1M hip. EM m . ..r.a �Pew .Kr a aA..lee:Rer !,,r,Rex...,'=m.e C.r..ee2eoee "Other" includes structures that o°Ik`A� 'n,„.... m.0.,,, =:„ , do not fall into preceding 4 �9 ry •Chy�rd Ta.hp 9udrs —R-.o, ,_, —H.Ray .w, Pa„Hudary categories. METRfprpL1i.4[J Figure MS.2: Miesville Land Use 2020,Metropolitan Council Table MS.4:Structural Inventory and Value,Miesville Use Type Number of Land Value Structural Value Total Value Structures Agricultural $7,545,500 $874,100 $8,419,600 16 Commercial $639,800 $1,153,900 $1,793,700 15 Exempt $702,500 $1,016,500 $1,719,000 8 Industrial $123,700 $136,200 $259,900 4 Residential $3,697,000 $10,145,500 $13,842,500 73 Utilities $166,100 $304,700 $470,800 0 TOTAL $12,874,600 $13,630,900 $26,505,500 116 Page 229 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Vulnerability Vulnerable Populations Table MS.5 provides current estimates of populations in Miesville considered by FEMA to be at potentially increased risk during hazard events. Table MS.5: Miesville Potentially Vulnerable Populations,American Community Survey 2015-2019 Estimates Potentially Vulnerable Miesville, MN— Population Percentage(%) U.S. (%) U.S. Difference Under Age 5 4.2% 6.1% -1.9% Over Age 65 22.7% 13.7% 9.0% Below Federal Poverty Line 0.8% 13.4% -12.6% Living with a Disability 4.2% 15.6% -11.4% Vulnerability of Critical Assets to Hazards Miesville staff evaluated potential vulnerabilities of critical facilities to their hazards of concern, provided in Table MS.6. Figure MS.3 provides general locations for selected critical assets in Miesville. Table MS.6: Miesville Assessment of Critical Assets(Redacted in Public Version of Plan £ O a, a N ( �_ -o E a m -0L a0.. � l.L fy0 p O y C 1i � y1 L L y 7 2 fa = '7 � 1 Critical Facilities VL = L3 LL 'L r -N a On _ — O b N > 2 fa -0 of LL 3 ~ V 3 U H 3X 0 w O u ai m Changes since the 2016 Plan Miesville officials identified changes to critical facilities since the plan update in 2016: • Flood mitigation culverts installed on Nicolai Avenue. Page 230 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Figure MS.3:City of Miesville—Critical Facilities(Redacted in Public Version of Plan National Flood Insurance Program Participation and Compliance Miesville does not participate in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). GIS review of parcel, building, and floodplain data identified no floodplain structures. Strategy Review and Development In 2021, Miesville representatives reviewed their strategies from the 2016 Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan for implementation progress(See Appendix III) and to identify strategies to carry forward into the 2022 Plan update as ongoing efforts or project that have not been completed. City staff considered and addressed FEMA requirements for: 1. A mitigation strategy that identifies and analyzes a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions and projects and further identifies which actions were selected for implementation 2. At least one strategy to reduce risk to buildings and infrastructure City staff also developed new strategies reflective of remaining concerns and vulnerabilities. Table MS.7 lists strategies for the City of Miesville, with additional information on hazards addressed by the strategy, priority, lead implementation agency, and estimated costs. Page 231 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Table MS.7: Miesville All-Hazard Mitigation Plan Strategies MIESVILLE MITIGATION STRATEGIES 1. Maintain city warning sirens.* Priority: High Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing yearly Hazards: Violent Storms,Tornado Implementation: Yearly inspections Lead: City Administration Est. Cost/Funding Source: City Budget 2. Stormwater management and coulee maintenance. Priority: Medium Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing,as needed Hazards: Flash Flood Implementation: Stormwater maintenance plan Lead: Dakota County Est. Cost/Funding Source: 3. Conduct hazmat training. Priority: Medium Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing Hazards: Structural Fire, Hazmat Incident Implementation: Annual training Lead: Miesville Fire Department Est. Cost/Funding Source: 4. Participate in full-scale exercise with County.** Priority: Medium Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing,as available Hazards: All,Tornado Implementation: Dakota County EDT Lead: Miesville Fire Department Est. Cost/Funding Source: *Reduces risk to buildings or infrastructure **Evaluated a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions; identified actions were selected for implementation Implementation Resources: Table MS.8 identifies staff resources and roles in implementing its mitigation strategies.Table MS.9 identifies process and ordinance resources. Table MS.8: Miesville Mitigation Implementation Resources Department,Responsible Position General Role Processes for Implementing Mitigation Strategies Building Inspections:contracted to Building inspections, regulation of Enforce safety restrictions Inspectron, Inc. new housing Planning/Zoning/Engineer:Contracted to Zoning,development, Floodplain ordinances, compliance Bolton &Menk Comprehensive Plans Police: Dakota County Sheriff Public safety, law enforcement, Response training Public Works: Dakota County Public Works Public infrastructure Maintenance and improvements Fire Department: Fire Chief,Tom Latuff Public-fire safety enforcement, Inspect commercial structures for emergency response fire hazards Table MS.9: Miesville Additional Implementation Resources Miesville Program/Policy/Technical Year Method of incorporation into the Documents adopted/revised hazard mitigation plan Comprehensive Plan 2020 Sets land use vision for community, provides existing and projected information Budget and Capital Improvement Plan 2020 Ensures equipment necessary to carry out essential functions Page 232 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 CITY OF NEW TRIER Table NT.1: New Trier Community Data Lifydale west south Mendota 5t Paul Population (2021): 86 Mendota St Paul Sunfish Heights Households: 38 lake Employment/Jobs: 60 Inver Grove Area: 0.2 Sq. Mi. Eagan Heights Major Land Uses: 68% Ag./Undeveloped Burnsville 21% Residential Apple Rosemount Nininger 10% Institutional Valley Twp Hastings Community Type: Diversified Rural [Hates Ravenna Undeveloped Area: 68% Lakeville Empire Twp Vermillion Twp Marshan Twp Source: Metropolitan Council Community Profiles Vermillion Twp Farmington Hampton Neer Trier Miesvilie Hazards of Concern 4 Eureka Twp Castle Rock Twp New Trier representatives evaluated potential Hampton Twp Douglas Twp hazards of concern in their community, using the Randolph Twp same rating model used by Dakota County and Waterford Randolph other participating cities. Greenvale Twp Twp SciotoTwp I Figure NT.1:City of New Trier Location Table NT.2: Dakota County Hazard Rating Model Parameter Rating=1 Rating=2 Rating=3 Rating=4 Frequency Unlikely:<1%chance in Occasional: Ito 10% Likely:>10 to<100% Highly Likely: 100%chance in 100 years chance in next year chance in next year next year Warning Time More than 12 hours 6-12 hours 3-6 hours None-minimal Extent Localized Community-wide County-wide or greater Likely Impact Negligible Limited Critical Catastrophic Table NT.3:New Trier Hazard Rating Hazard Frequency Warning Geographic Likely Total Time Extent Impact Violent Summer Storms (e.g., wind, hail) 3 2 3 4 12 Tornado 3 2 2 4 11 Violent Winter Storms 4 2 2 3 11 Flash Flood 3 2 2 4 11 Drought 3 2 3 3 11 Extreme Heat or Cold 3 2 3 3 11 Structural Fire 3 2 2 4 11 _ Hazardous Material Incidents 2 3 2 4 11 Infectious Disease Outbreak/Pandemic 3 1 3 4 11 Civil Unrest 3 1 3 4 11 Overland Flood (spring snowmelt) 3 2 2 3 10 Wastewater Treatment Plant Failure 2 4 3 1 10 Terrorism 2 1 3 4 10 Cyber Threats 3 1 3 3 10 Water Supply Contamination 2 1 2 4 9 Wildfire 1 2 2 3 8 Landslide 2 2 1 3 8 Page 233 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 General Land Use Figure NT.2 depicts general land 2020 Generalized Land Use use in New Trier, with New Trier Agriculture/undeveloped and residential being the predominant land uses. ! i Structural Inventory Value Table NT.4 provides a current total and estimated value for structures in the City of New Trier. Data are from the Dakota County's Offices of Assessor Services and Geographic 1 —.1 Information Services. ' MEI Structures identified as residential, commercial, industrial, and agricultural have the types of structures + ; associated with those land uses. "Exempt" includes all buildings not subject to property taxes, _. - such as government buildings, av°.' " 1 inch-a.09m schools, and places of worship. aoxa Laud use Classes "Utilities" includes fixed sites S"g'`"'" " ImArnarrwyR;b` """d"' "'m"" with infrastructure for —aFr�= �� _. �. PxA mdR.,..en ow.r �'�m' u=.,.d„�.��..7 !��..,crnnsc,,,nnw rn.axaoda cnnR u.,7:,e aria. electricity, sewer, and water. - ■� �� • ,Ca.�� "Other" includes structures that .aoCeuwms6cuMe�Y — Cyandr tapseuMeAee —R J, - RaIFa,n Pane/ea.deir do not fall into preceding rode ro. , y= m categories. Figure NT.2: New Trier Land Use 2020,Metropolitan Council Table NT.4:Structural Inventory and Value,New Trier Use Type Number of Land Value Structural Value Total Value Structures Agricultural $422,600 $29,500 $452,100 5 Commercial $117,200 $345,300 $462,500 3 Exempt $456,600 $866,900 $1,323,500 6 Residential $2,322,000 $4,926,600 $7,248,600 53 TOTAL $3,318,400 $6,168,300 $9,486,700 67 Page 234 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Vulnerability Vulnerable Populations Table NT.5 provides current estimates of populations in New Trier considered by FEMA to be at potentially increased risk during hazard events. Table NT.5: New Trier Potentially Vulnerable Populations,American Community Survey 2015-2019 Estimates Potentially Vulnerable New Trier, MN— Population Percentage(%) U.S. (%) U.S. Difference Under Age 5 0.0% 6.1% -6.1% Over Age 65 11.8% 13.7% -1.9% Below Federal Poverty Line 6.5% 13.4% -6.9% Living with a Disability 14.0% 15.6% -1.6% Vulnerability of Critical Assets to Hazards New Trier officials evaluated potential vulnerabilities of critical facilities to their hazards of concern, provided in Table NT.6. Figure Nt.3 provides general locations for selected critical assets in New Trier. Table NT.6: New Trier Assessment of Critical Assets(Redacted in Public Version of Plan) E O cu N _ m N (A O O t1 'O O £ O to E f0 Critical v+ m v c 2 ,;, a O y `E Lao H = a i O 3 i f0 V 2 O -O 3 N LL Facilities E E v 3 0' u .. -F., a, 'A' m — m 2 E c i E 2 E LL c c St a`, r - , tan 3 O 3 > x V to w u ate, d M C Changes since the 2016 Plan New Trier officials identified no changes to critical facilities since the plan update in 2016. Page 235 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Fi:ure NT.3:City of New Trier—Critical Facilities(Redacted in Public Version of Plan National Flood Insurance Program Participation and Compliance New Trier does not participate in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). GIS review of parcel, building, and floodplain data identified no floodplain structures. Strategy Review and Development In 2021, New Trier representatives reviewed their strategies from the 2016 Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan for implementation progress (See Appendix III) and to identify strategies to carry forward into the 2022 Plan update as ongoing efforts or project that have not been completed. City staff considered and addressed FEMA requirements for: 1. A mitigation strategy that identifies and analyzes a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions and projects and further identifies which actions were selected for implementation 2. At least one strategy to reduce risk to buildings and infrastructure City staff also developed new strategies reflective of remaining concerns and vulnerabilities. Table NT.7 lists New Trier's strategies, with additional information on hazards addressed by the strategy, priority, lead implementation agency, and estimated costs. Page 236 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Table NT.7: New Trier All-Hazard Mitigation Plan Strategies NEW TRIER MITIGATION STRATEGIES 1. Install backup power at water tower. Priority: High Status/Completion: Existing/TBD STAPLEE: Medium Implementation: Emergency Preparedness Plan Hazards: Severe Summer and Winter Storms Est. Cost/Funding Source: $10,000/Cost-share Lead: Water Department,Superintendent with County 2. Update Building Ordinance. Priority: High Status/Completion: Existing/TBD STAPLEE: Medium Implementation: Local building codes Hazards: Structural Fire,Severe Storms Est. Cost/Funding Source: $16,000/Cost-share Lead: Planning,City Council with County 3. Complete parking upgrades. Priority: High Status/Completion: Existing/TBD STAPLEE: High Implementation: Emergency Preparedness Plan Hazards: Several, emergency access Est. Cost/Funding Source: $600/City Lead: City Council *Reduces risk to buildings or infrastructure **Evaluated a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions;identified actions were selected for implementation Implementation Resources: Table NT.8 identifies staff resources and roles in implementing its mitigation strategies. Table NT.8: New Trier Staff Mitigation Implementation Resources Department,Responsible General Role Processes for Implementing Mitigation Position Strategies Building Inspections: Building inspections, regulation of Enforce safety restrictions, e.g.,setbacks, contracted new housing building materials, and fire suppression Planning/Zoning/Engineer: Zoning,development, Floodplain ordinances and compliance Comprehensive Plans Police: contracted Public safety, law enforcement, Response training,public safety education emergency response Public Works:contracted Develop and operate public City well inspection and maintenance infrastructure Fire Department:contracted Public-fire safety enforcement, Inspect commercial structures for fire hazards emergency response City Council Establish policy, enact budget Budget allocations or plan initiatives City Administration Decision-support for Council, City operations Table NT.9 identifies process and ordinance resources. Table NT.9: New Trier Additional Implementation Resources New Trier Program/Policy/Technical Year Documents adopted/revised Incorporation into the hazard mitigation plan Water tower/well back up power 2011 Infrastructure upgrades to support hazard mitigation 2040 comprehensive plan 2020 Mitigation plan and comp plan support one another Emergency preparedness plan 2010 Hazard identification and ranking Wellhead Protection Plan 2020 Mitigation of potential contamination Page 237 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 CITY OF RANDOLPH Table RN.1: Randolph Community Data UWale west Population (2020): 466 Mendoea St Paul South ?vlendota St Paul Heights Sunfish Households: 166 Lake Employment/Jobs: 143 Inver Grove Area: 1.0 Sq. Mi. Iran Heights Major Land Uses: 67% Ag./ Undeveloped 19% Residential Burnsville fipple Rosemount Ninin`er 5% Park and Valley Twp Hastings Recreational Coates Ravenna Community Type: Diversified Rural Lakeville Em Piro TM, VermiIIfon Twp Marshan Twp Undeveloped Area: 67% Vermillion Twp Source: Metropolitan Council Community Profiles Farmington Hampton New Trier Micsville Hazards of Concern Eureka Twp Castle hock Twp Hampton Twp Douglas Twp Randolph representatives evaluated potential andoiph Twp hazards of concern in their community, using the Waterford Ra Twp Sdota same rating model used by Dakota County and Greenvale Twp Twp other participating cities. Morchf.ld Figure RN.1:City of Randolph Location Table RN.2: Dakota County Hazard Rating Model Parameter Rating=1 Rating=2 Rating=3 Rating=4 Frequency Unlikely:<1%chance in Occasional: 1 to 10% Likely:>10 to<100% Highly Likely:100%chance in 100 years chance in next year chance in next year next year Warning Time More than 12 hours 6-12 hours 3-6 hours None-minimal Extent Localized Community-wide County-wide or greater Likely Impact Negligible Limited Critical Catastrophic Table RN.3: Randolph Hazard Rating Hazard Frequency Warning Geographic Likely Total Time Extent Impact Violent Summer Storms (e.g., wind, hail) 3 4 3 3 13 Tornado 3 4 2 4 13 Extreme Heat or Cold 4 1 3 4 12 Hazardous Material Incidents 2 4 2 4 12 Terrorism 1 4 3 4 12 Violent Winter Storms 4 1 3 3 11 Drought 4 1 3 3 11 Structural Fire 3 4 1 3 11 Water Supply Contamination 1 4 2 4 11 Flash Flood 1 4 1 4 10 Overland Flood (spring snowmelt) 2 4 1 3 10 Wildfire 1 4 2 3 10 Infectious Disease Outbreak/Pandemic 2 1 3 3 9 Cyber Threats 1 4 1 2 8 Landslide 1 4 1 1 7 Civil Unrest 1 1 3 2 7 Dam Failure 1 1 2 1.5 5.5 Wastewater Treatment Plant Failure N/A -- -- -- 0 Page 238 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 General Land Use Figure RN.2 depicts general 2020 Generalized Land Use land use in Randolph, with Randolph Agriculture/undeveloped and , l residential being the am '-. - predominant land uses. i Structural Inventory Value Table RN.4 provides a current • total and estimated value for structures in the City of I IF 1 Randolph. I -- 1 II *I Data are from the Dakota County's Offices of Assessor Services and Geographic Information Services. 111 Structures identified as residential, commercial, 1 i industrial, and agricultural have i� the types of structures :- associated with those land uses. 1 "Exempt" includes all buildings i 1 not subject to property taxes, such as government buildings, - - - - - - - - 11 schools, and places of worship. I °F,rernrr.te, 1 Ir. =0 11.>lh miles "Utilities" includes fixed sites 2020 Land Use Classes — Al :i.NVe Fenny RNMMnW ....ay Rermnpl. .arm[,. PIWIe7N /g,eeml.f 71rlort.W with infrastructure for - .i�n.e 9rq.Fu�RemIrd .far,Mrid R..e.iv.. -im-a u.• -Vern -Wpn .se INV.Wb r�,,.e,,,m,„.,,.l -e -�I.q, electricity, sewer, and water. �Gmy�Y� w ..e,M-a,�,..,.a .nd Mart w memo..° .. .,� ,�. NeNPNo N i s=.,sae•.,.. o "Other" includes structures that °" -��n -l•.awo°.l -°°P°... U 'tl l.r.p.!,• Red e.i.ddFILLiiY ne De...,i • ..C..mil..� a do not fall into preceding o�.: �..• .m m m ..e1.-eowie«,. R. °e..«� categories. —ea""b'grndery — Cm.ndiewnenbee.n.ded« —Reads -1 nel..y . P,rcol�w,mry 46 -.+p+n1d p'.d d --,.yr.mm M p Pd]IM1O1IIL" •e 4wmi Figure RN.2: Randolph Land Use 2020,Metropolitan Council Table RN.4:Structural Inventory and Value,Randolph Use Type Number of Land Value Structural Value Total Value Structures Agricultural $2,290,100 $142,400 $2,432,500 18 Commercial $396,500 $587,300 $983,800 7 Exempt $1,470,300 $5,080,800 $6,551,100 28 Industrial $495,700 $695,500 $1,191,200 13 Other $48,000 $146,800 $194,800 2 Residential $10,156,700 $33,962,200 $44,118,900 383 Utilities $17,000 $66,900 $83,900 0 TOTAL $14,874,300 $40,681,900 $55,556,200 451 Page 239 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Vulnerability Vulnerable Populations Table RN.5 provides current estimates of populations in Randolph considered by FEMA to be at potentially increased risk during hazard events. Table RN.5:Randolph Potentially Vulnerable Populations,American Community Survey 2015-2019 Estimates Potentially Vulnerable Randolph, MN— Population Percentage(%) U.S. (%) U.S. Difference Under Age 5 10.4% 6.1% 4.3% Over Age 65 11.4% 13.7% -2.3% Below Federal Poverty Line 7.9% 13.4% -5.5% Living with a Disability 7.7% 15.6% -7.9% Vulnerability of Critical Assets to Hazards Randolph officials evaluated potential vulnerabilities of critical facilities to their hazards of concern, provided in Table RN.6. Figure RN.3 provides general locations for selected critical assets in Randolph. Table RN.6:Randolph Assessment of Critical Assets(Redacted in Public Version of Plan) C � o a, m C c N L CIC N E a .0 O Y Q aJ O O LI- 'O O C CC li E 2 it I' 2 ?_ -O_ H f6 L •C Z {A `a N O -O •L C W tg - .f6 N Critical Facilities a`, E 42 .� ai C 2 7c) aC, LL �n 1— - E LL ` o a a`, 12 3 o m CA al= 3 0 O> r x 0 N W L ti a, fa C Changes since the 2016 Plan Randolph officials identified no substantial changes to critical facilities since the plan update in 2016. Page 240 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Figure RN.3:City of Randolph—Critical Facilities(Redacted in Public Version of Plan National Flood Insurance Program Participation and Compliance Table RN.7 includes information on Randolph's participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Additional information follows about City compliance with the terms of the NFIP. Table RN.7: Randolph NFIP Participation Current Effective Policies Insurance Community CID Number Map Date In-force In-force Randolph 270112 12/2/2011 - - Compliance: Compliance is ensured through use of the City's official flood zoning map and enforcement of City Ordinances related to floodplain zones, allowed/prohibited uses, standards, and addressing violations. Table RN.8 provides an inventory and assessed value of structures in the City of Randolph located within the digital flood insurance rate map (DFIRM) boundaries. Structures are listed by predominant land use categories. The table was compiled with data from the Dakota County Office of GIS and Assessor's Office. Table RN.8: Total Floodplain Structure and Value Inventory,Randolph Structure Type Estimated Land Value Estimated Building Value Total Value Total Structures Exempt $54,000 $0 $54,000 4 Residential $35,800 $7,900 $43,700 1 Total $89,800 $7,900 $97,700 5 Page 241 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Strategy Review and Development In 2021, Randolph representatives reviewed their strategies from the 2016 Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan for implementation progress (See Appendix III) and to identify strategies to carry forward into the 2022 Plan update as ongoing efforts or project that have not been completed. City officials considered and addressed FEMA requirements for: 1. A mitigation strategy that identifies and analyzes a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions and projects and further identifies which actions were selected for implementation 2. At least one strategy to reduce risk to buildings and infrastructure City officials also developed new strategies reflective of remaining concerns and vulnerabilities. Table RN.9 lists Randolph's strategies, with additional information on hazards addressed by the strategy, priority, lead implementation agency, and estimated costs. Table RN.9: Randolph All-Hazard Mitigation Plan Strategies RANDOLPH MITIGATION STRATEGIES 1. Water Tower Inspection.* Priority: Status/Completion: Existing/2020,ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: As needed Hazards: Water Supply Est. Cost/Funding Source: /City Budget Lead: Water Department,Superintendent 2. Anhydrous Ammonia Training. Priority: Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Hazards: Hazmat Incident Est. Cost/Funding Source: /City Budget Lead: Fire Department, Chief 3. Building Code Updates.* Priority: Status/Completion: New/Every three years STAPLEE: High Implementation: Local Building Code Hazards: Structural Fire,Violent Storms Est. Cost/Funding Source: TBD Lead: Dakota Community Development Agency (CDA) 4. New Sirens.* Priority: Status/Completion: New/TBD STAPLEE: High Implementation: Grant,City Funding Hazards: Summer Storms,Tornado, Hazmat Incident Est. Cost/Funding Source: $11,000/Grants Lead: Dakota CDA, contractor 5. Additional Water Tower. Priority: Status/Completion: New/TBD STAPLEE: High Implementation: City Funding Hazards: Water Supply Est. Cost/Funding Source: $800,000/City Budget, Lead: Water Department, Contract Installer Loans *Reduces risk to buildings or infrastructure **Evaluated a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions;identified actions were selected for implementation Implementation Resources: Table RN.10 identifies staff resources and roles in implementing its mitigation strategies. Page 242 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Table RN.10: Randolph Mitigation Implementation Resources Department,Responsible General Role Processes for Implementing Mitigation Position Strategies Building Inspections: Building inspections, regulation of Enforce safety restrictions including setbacks, contracted new housing building materials,fire suppression systems Planning/Zoning/Engineer: Zoning,development, Floodplain ordinances and compliance City Engineer Comprehensive Plans Police:County Sheriff Public safety, law enforcement, Response training,public safety education emergency response Public Works:Water Development and operations of City well inspection and maintenance Supervisor public infrastructure Fire Department: Fire Chief Public-fire safety enforcement, Inspect commercial structures for fire hazards emergency response City Council Establish policy,enact budget, Budget allocations,plan initiatives enforce ordinances Table RN.11 identifies process and ordinance resources. Table RN.11: Randolph Additional Implementation Resources Randolph Program/Policy/Technical Year Method of incorporation into the hazard mitigation plan Documents adopted/revised Comprehensive Plan 2020 Reviewed Building Ordinance 2019 Zoning Ordinance 2009 Reviewed Stormwater Ordinance 2010 Reviewed Current version of State Building Code 2015 Reviewed Emergency Operations Guideline Uniform Fire Code 2016 Regular enforcement Page 243 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT Table RS.1: Rosemount Community Data Lilydale West Population (2020 : 25 650 Mendota St Paul SSt°uth p ` ) , Mendota Paul Sunfish Households: 8,931 Heights Lake Employment/Jobs: 7,072 Inver Grove Area: 35.2 Sq. Mi. Eagan Heights Major Land Uses: 58% Ag./ Undeveloped 17% Residential Burnsville Apple Ninin er Valley Rosemount g 11% Industrial Twp Hastings 5% Park and Ravenna Recreation Lakeville Ern Ire Twp Twp P P Vermillion l°n Marshan Twp Community Type: Emerging Suburban Edge Farmington Vermillion Twp Undeveloped Area: 58% - Source:Metropolitan Council CommunityProfiles Haln pt°n New Trier p Mlesville Eureka Twp Castl a Rock Twp Hazards of Concern Hampton Twp Douglas Twp Rosemount staff evaluated potential hazards of Randolph Twp Waterford Randolph concern in their community, using the same rating Greenvale Twp Twp Sciota model used by Dakota County and other I Twp participating cities. rI ni" Figure RS.1:City of Rosemount Location Table RS.2: Dakota County Hazard Rating Model Parameter Rating=1 Rating=2 Rating=3 Rating=4 Frequency Unlikely:<1%chance in Occasional: 1 to 10% Likely:>10 to<100% Highly Likely:100%chance in 100 years chance in next year chance in next year next year Warning Time More than 12 hours 6-12 hours 3-6 hours None-minimal Extent Localized Community-wide County-wide or greater Likely Impact Negligible Limited Critical Catastrophic Table RS.3: Rosemount Hazard Rating Hazard Frequency Warning Geographic Likely Total Time Extent Impact Violent Summer Storms (e.g., wind, hail) 4 4 2 3 13 Tornado 4 4 1 3 12 Violent Winter Storms 3 4 2 3 12 Flash Flood 2 4 3 3 12 Overland Flood (spring snowmelt) 3 3 3 3 12 Drought 4 3 2 2 11 Wildfire 2 4 2 3 11 Extreme Heat or Cold 4 2 3 2 11 Landslide 4 1 3 3 11 Structural Fire 1 4 3 3 11 Hazardous Material Incidents 2 4 2 2 10 Infectious Disease Outbreak/Pandemic 3 1 3 3 10 Water Supply Contamination 1 4 2 3 10 Wastewater Treatment Plant Failure 1 2 3 3 9 Terrorism 1 4 1 2 8 Civil Unrest 2 1 2 2 7 Cyber Threats 2 2 1 1 6 Dam Failure 2 1 1 2 6 Page 244 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 General Land Use Figure RS.2 depicts general land use in Rosemount, with agriculture/ undeveloped and residential (single-and multi-family) being the predominant land uses. 2020 Generalized Land Use Rosemount in" .s e �. . I a �iVI --ii(''''''''.0_:..mr..- & 4,0 4:-.. -pAt it Ail - tilt. ----__ _ E.,-7F-engra i ... q..1.1,,! ___ : . ..., ,. firid, i- ., ,.,..., ,Ista . L. ... nt► 1C Rr ur G�c1 r Ste, _ �►,4.'a 1 flegel r lei- il:kiliip ,,c .--' 61 - , tic. „le itlii 0 ��,f. ir wag I i I._._ ■ ill'I, i _ -; atib. ! . . . - r. *.'11!PIL:'I - Approximately 1 Inch=1.089 Was s 2020 Land Use Classes S,r=greFarrwr Reaiee]=b=1 MwbMraiy Resedendal Aak.YLMe Minas!as! Aprkwnnr lesiapnrrark. a Cou Dm n1 -.erm, $..1...p12F.niq'_-. Ea PA.ad ll..Ra.d..a.l M Inmanol an.Jnlrr — ,,r.=Io.ra M rlaia ma'Mr —..Cry AM Texmintp ecnnderet 7 5pwe..1 L.* IM MAW* El M.adu..Iaamr.l �r.naew. M R.HM w xi o 1 S I F.n.,,Dt140.ri Corrarmrnal I.Mr.Use Coneeacw, Prk.nd Rewnon Other -Anpa! —Roads—Awl nx, Pauacrmd 1 a,srr- - y I a Overt icv 6ianW4w+ar Fyn ecneaonr.I or Przserve -a--ebpee �i Fa aoly :Ire I•.vn�tira� w'=nose '=,=. PereelBe nmry rand Ilse Oeta Soerc es: ••..i.;a�e r n'-xaea f. I Ina-e�y •'re::e-e a.z xa au — iox0 se�erneawns Rao•�carline lea;,eosoa�ei F:is ., x:3c�ema �n�� w x�i 2➢�Pacar Caraliomal Seren AMio IlanCwnc� •narn.e Meouroea '.I,Cnrcaa Cnmmviry Fweaecr n ii MEHhOrOuTAN Figure RS.2: Rosemount Land Use 2020,Metropolitan Council Structural Inventory Value Table RS.4 provides a current total and estimated value for structures in the City of Rosemount. Data are from the Dakota County's Offices of Assessor Services and Geographic Information Services. Properties identified as residential, commercial, industrial, and agricultural have the types of structures associated with those land uses. "Exempt" includes buildings not subject to property taxes, such as schools, and places of worship. "Utilities" includes infrastructure for electricity, sewer, and water. Table RS.4:Structural Inventory and Value,Rosemount Use Type Land Value Structural Value Total Value Number of Structures Agricultural $84,613,400 $5,321,900 $89,935,300 292 Commercial $47,234,400 $60,120,000 $107,354,400 125 Exempt $75,096,200 $125,004,900 $200,101,100 405 Industrial $77,688,700 $172,018,600 $249,707,300 _ 590 Other $499,300 $566,900 $1,066,200 18 Residential $885,137,800 $2,136,126,600 $3,021,264,400 9,345 Utilities $171,100 $4,614,400 $4,785,500 7 TOTAL $1,170,440,900 $2,503,773,300 $3,674,214,200 10,782 Page 245 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Vulnerability Vulnerable Populations Table RS.5 provides current estimates of populations in Rosemount considered by FEMA to be at potentially increased risk during hazard events. Table RS.5: Rosemount Potentially Vulnerable Populations,American Community Survey 2015-2019 Estimates Potentially Vulnerable Rosemount, MN— Population Percentage (%) U.S. (%) U.S. Difference Under Age 5 7.7% 6.1% 1.6% Over Age 65 10.1% 13.7% -3.6% Below Federal Poverty Line 3.7% 13.4% -9.7% Living with a Disability 6.0% 15.6% -9.6% Vulnerability of Critical Assets to Hazards Rosemount staff evaluated potential vulnerabilities of critical facilities to their hazards of concern, provided in Table RS.6. Figure RS.3 provides general locations for selected critical assets in Rosemount. Dam failure was removed as a hazard consideration. Table RS.6: Rosemount Assessment of Critical Assets(Redacted in Public Version of Plan) u C E O al +r v fa A N CE yl N ci3d E cu 0 }, Q 4- t. E ar v) i O a. N O -0 .7 i cu L bA 'a .0 Critical Facilities c Y - - m u c `o a c al v it) u o u 5 al :1A a as _ r i= 2 a - ar 3 0 E E .. ly E U. V . a N `^ = y c H O fil U ✓ .al. al fa C Changes since the 2016 Plan Rosemount staff identified the following significant land use changes and additions to critical facilities since the plan update in 2016: New construction of large gathering spaces including the Hope Fieldhouse and the Flint Hills Sports Complex. Page 246 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Fi:ure RS.3:City of Rosemount—Critical Facilities(Redacted in Public Version of PIa1 National Flood Insurance Program Participation and Compliance Table RS.7 includes information on Rosemount's participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Additional information follows about City compliance with the terms of the NFIP. Table RS.7:Rosemount NFIP Participation Current Effective Policies Insurance Community CID Number Map Date In-force In-force Rosemount 270113 12/2/11 6 $1,190,000 Compliance: Purpose and Intent-The floodplain district is designed to provide floodplain management for the City of Rosemount in accordance with Minnesota statutes.The intent of the floodplain district is to regulate the flood hazard areas for the purposes of reducing the risk of loss of life, loss of property, health and safety hazards, disruption of commerce and governmental services, extraordinary public expenditures for flood protection and relief, and impairment of the tax base, all of which adversely affect the public health, safety, and general welfare. National Flood Insurance Program Compliance:This section is adopted to comply with the rules and regulations of the national flood insurance program codified as 44 Code of Federal Regulations parts 59-78, as amended, so as to maintain the community's eligibility in the national flood insurance program. Page 247 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Table RS.8 provides an inventory and assessed value of structures in the City of Rosemount located within the digital flood insurance rate map (DFIRM) boundaries. Structures are listed by predominant land use categories. The table was compiled with data from the Dakota County Office of GIS and Assessor's Office. Table RS.8: Total Floodplain Structure and Value Inventory,Rosemount Structure Type Estimated Land Value Estimated Building Value Total Value Total Structures Exempt $2,586,400 $282,900 $2,869,300 3 Industrial $4,244,800 $2,908,700 $7,153,500 7 Total $6,831,200 $3,191,600 $10,022,800 10 Strategy Review and Development In 2021, Rosemount staff reviewed their strategies from the 2016 Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan for implementation progress(See Appendix III) and to identify strategies to carry forward into the 2022 Plan update as ongoing efforts or project that have not been completed. City staff considered and addressed FEMA requirements for: 1. A mitigation strategy that identifies and analyzes a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions and projects and further identifies which actions were selected for implementation 2. At least one strategy to reduce risk to buildings and infrastructure City staff also developed new strategies reflective of remaining concerns and vulnerabilities. Table RS.9 lists Rosemount's strategies, with additional information on hazards addressed by the strategy, priority, lead implementation agency, and estimated costs. Table RS.9: Rosemount All-Hazard Mitigation Plan Strategies ROSEMOUNT MITIGATION STRATEGIES 1. Maintain a rental property license and inspection program. Priority: Low Status/Completion: Ongoing/Each unit inspected STAPLEE: Low every two years Hazards: Structural Fire Implementation: City code, enforcement Lead: Building Inspection Staff Est. Cost/Funding Source: $12,000/Rental License Fee 2. Emergency siren replacement and updates. Priority: Medium Implementation: Emergency Operations Plan (EOP), STAPLEE: Medium Capital Improvement Program (CIP)for ongoing Hazards: Severe Storms,Tornado, Hazmat Incident upgrades and preventive maintenance plan Lead: Police Department, Chief Est. Cost/Funding Source: $30,000/General Fund, Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing Grants 3. Fire truck replacement or refurbishment. Priority: Medium Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing STAPLEE: Medium Implementation: EOP, CIP Hazards: Structural Fire, Multiple Hazards- Est. Cost/Funding Source: $150,000 yearly/General Emergencies Fund Lead: Fire Department, Chief 4. Police car replacement. Priority: Medium Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing STAPLEE: Medium Implementation: EOP, CIP, evaluation of current Hazards: Structural Fire, Multiple Hazards- leasing program Emergencies Est. Cost/Funding Source: $100,000 yearly/General Lead: Police Department, Chief Fund Page 248 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 5. Increase water storage and redundancy.* Priority: Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Comprehensive Water Supply Plan Hazards: Water Supply, Fire Suppression Est. Cost/Funding Source: $5,000,000 yearly/ Lead: Public Works, Director General Fund, Development Fees 6. Implement North Central Sanitary Sewer Plan.** Priority: Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Comp. Plan,Sanitary Sewer Plan Hazards: Water Supply Contamination (failed septic) Est. Cost/Funding Source: $1,500,000/General Lead: Public Works and Community Development Fund, Property Assessments 7. Code review and revision. Priority: Low Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing STAPLEE: Low Implementation: City code Hazards: Structural Fire, multiple hazards Est. Cost/Funding Source: $5,000 yearly/General Lead: Community Development, Director Fund 8. Identify methods or strategies to protect critical infrastructure from civil unrest. Priority: High Status/Completion: New/2022 STAPLEE: Implementation: EOP, Campus Security Plan Hazards: Civil Unrest Est. Cost/Funding Source: TBD/Domestic Lead: Police Dept., Chief Preparedness Committee 9. Focus efforts for expansion and/or improvement of broadband across facilities and community. Priority: Medium Status/Completion: New/Ongoing STAPLEE: Implementation: EOP/EOC updates Hazards: Cyber Attack, EOC functionality Est. Cost/Funding Source: TBD/CIP-General Fund Lead: IT Dept., Director 10. Provide Trunk Stormwater Discharge System. Priority: Medium Implementation: Comprehensive Surface Water STAPLEE: Mgmt. Plan Hazards: Flooding Est. Cost/Funding Source: $10M-$15M/ Lead: Public Works, Director Stormwater Trunk Fund, Development Fees, Status/Completion: New/Ongoing Developer-constructed *Reduces risk to buildings or infrastructure **Evaluated a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions;identified actions were selected for implementation Implementation Resources: Table RS.10 identifies staff resources and roles in implementing its mitigation strategies. Table RS.10: Rosemount Mitigation Implementation Resources Department, General Role Processes and Tool for Implementing Mitigation Responsible Position Strategies Building Inspections, Building inspections, regulation Adoption and enforcement of State building code, City building inspector of new housing development. revision of City Ordinance as necessary, evaluation and inspection of safety standards. Planning and Zoning, Zoning, development siting and Floodplain management and land use planning Planning Director restrictions,Comprehensive Plans Police, Police Chief Public safety and law Emergency Operations Planning, public safety education, enforcement,emergency emergency response training and purchasing of response necessary equipment. Public Works,Public Develop and operate public CIP;comprehensive plan execution; manage Works Director infrastructure(roads, utilities) transportation infrastructure,storm and sanitary sewers,and the water production system. Page 249 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Department, General Role Processes and Tool for Implementing Mitigation Responsible Position Strategies Fire Department, Fire Public and fire safety Emergency response training,fire code enforcement, Chief enforcement,emergency and public education. response Table RS.11 identifies process and ordinance resources. Table RS.11: Rosemount Additional Implementation Resources Year Rosemount Program,Policy, and adopted- Method of incorporation into the hazard mitigation plan Technical Documents revised Emergency Operations Plan 2021 City follows the Emergency Operations Plan when an emergency or natural disaster occurs. _ Minnesota State Building Code 2007 All new buildings must meet building code. Minnesota State Fire Code 2007 All new buildings and changes in use must meet fire code. Rental Licensing and Inspection 2008 All rental units must be inspected at least once every two years to Code ensure compliance with City, building,and fire codes. Controls the use and connection onto the City water and sewer Municipal Water and Sewer Code 2007 system. Requires failing private systems to connect to public system when available to eliminate health issues from failed private systems. Controls the location and construction of public and private utilities. Right-of-Way Management 2008 Provides accurate records of utility locations for use in emergencies Ordinance and requires separation of utility that may damage or impact each other if the utility line were to leak. Regulates solid waste(garbage),weeds and vegetation, and Health and Sanitation Ordinance 2012 composting. The regulation is to minimize the chance or impact of health issues that could arise from unsanitary conditions. Controls and regulations alarm systems,alcohol, animals,drugs, Police Regulations Code 2015 firearm discharge,graffiti and minors to discourage terroristic acts, property damage,and physical crimes. Controls use and parking of vehicles in the right-of-way to allow free Traffic and Motor Vehicle Code 2021 travel for public works vehicles during winter storm events and emergency vehicles during an emergency event. Controls the use of existing surface water bodies and the Surface Water and Storm water 2015 construction and management of stormwater infrastructure. The Management Ordinance controls intend to limit health impacts from exposure to surface water bodies and control flood damage due to weather events. Controls the development of land and buildings to ensure that there is enough space and distance between buildings and uses to reduce Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance 2016 the chance an emergency at a building or use would affect the neighboring buildings/uses. Also regulates streets and utilities in developments to ensure that emergency vehicles and personnel can reach and react at locations if an emergency event occurs. Rosemount Comprehensive Plan 2020 Guides the future development of the City including an adequate roads, utilities,and emergency facilities. Plans and budgets to ensure that roads, utilities, and emergency Capital Improvement Plan 2020 vehicles and facilities are purchased,constructed,and maintained; supports hazard mitigation Page 250 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 CITY OF SOUTH ST. PAUL Table SS.1:South St.Paul Community Data Li lydale West Population (2020): 20,769 Mendota MY St PauNii. lndotaHouseholds: 8,432 Heights Lems Employment/Jobs: 5,863 Inver Grove Area: 6.2 Sq. Mi. Eagan Heights Major Land Uses: 43% Residential r _ 11% Industrial Burnsville Apple Rosemount Nininger - 11% Park and Valley Twp Hastings Recreational `notes Ravenna) Community Type: Urban Center LakevIlle Empire Twp Vermillion MarshanTwp nvp Undeveloped Area: 8% 1 Vermillion Twp Farm)nglon Source: Metropolitan Council Community Profiles -_ _ ____ --- Hampton New Trier Miesvdle Hazards o f Concern Eureka Twp Castle Rock Twp Hampton Twp Douglas Twp South St. Paul staff evaluated potential hazards of Randolph Twp concern in their community, using the same rating Waterford Randolph model used by Dakota County and other Greenvale Twp Twp STo P ,r w participating cities. --- nom/Amid • s f ..o'o;.` „o:'i. �cs°rno ,,m tp n•M•QlaNmnnloroo�hoco• 7fe:'a�nM1 it-r•Ir:, Figure SS.1:City of South St. Paul Location Table SS.2: Dakota County Hazard Rating Model Parameter Rating=1 Rating=2 Rating=3 Rating=4 Frequency Unlikely:<1%chance in Occasional: 1 to 10% Likely:>10 to<100% Highly Likely:100%chance in 100 years chance in next year chance in next year next year Warning Time More than 12 hours 6-12 hours 3-6 hours None-minimal Extent Localized Community-wide County-wide or greater Likely Impact Negligible Limited Critical Catastrophic Table SS.3:South St.Paul Hazard Rating Hazard Frequency Warning Geographic Likely Total Time Extent Impact Civil Unrest 2 3 3 3 _ 11 Cyber Threats 4 4 1 2 11 Structural Fire 3 4 1 2 10 Water Supply Contamination 1 _ 4 2 _ 3 10 Wastewater Treatment Plant Failure 1 4 2 3 10 Violent Summer Storms (e.g., wind, hail) 4 2 1 2 9 Flash Flood 3 3 1 2 9 Extreme Heat or Cold 4 1 3 1 9 Hazardous Material Incidents 2 4 1 2 9 Infectious Disease Outbreak/Pandemic 3 1 3 2 9 Terrorism 1 4 1 3 9 Tornado 3 2 1 2 8 Violent Winter Storms 4 1 2 1 8 Overland Flood (spring snowmelt) 3 1 1 3 8 Drought 3 1 3 1 8 Landslide 1 1 1 2 5 Wildfire 1 1 1 1 4 Dam Failure 1 1 1 1 4 Page 251 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 General Land Use Figure SS.2 depicts general land 2020 Generalized Land Use use in South St. Paul, with South St. Paul residential (single-and multi- r Lve _: - - family) being the predominant IIIIIIIII=_� �`T• $• -—!' mi11FlIer. W. ` ! , land use. I - 1IIItA_�=�I'. ,:\ ` - Structural Inventory =uj: - 11; s 1 ' , . r !- ' Value �, �� 1�� `,��1 �ii ."l ;� r,1- fN' ;; Table SS.4 provides a current „'� i`I '71■ Illiiill -- s11��17111i1i5�L � total and estimated value forIt6 IIi1Dl E"a�r`. structures in the South St. Paul. , i ai 1111111 1i.rt y�811 . \% • - BIM,+m ■ - — ---_ Data are from the DakotariL r.....!lllliiM�'1Ieiiill ! ! ' �11111i1111N� "- / ; County's Offices of Assessor _ ml#It17'' — ti #IJ till ^ 4 r Services and Geographic #111#ii . .i ,,� a�a.VA ri Information Services. * mti } IIYI, -- I! 1dr IIy -_ I \ i r-J Structures identified as I n #. ' 11, iii .� \ • , residential, commercial, ,,.. IIIIY�� *i1 ;r ,- industrial and agricultural have / FL ...1= 11�t■`'`''g ; the types of structures _ _./� Ar17/41 ;III, t__ ` \ —on associated with those land uses. + �i° i :�l um . . l i "Exempt" includes all buildings �� ■11 ,'=':.I,� ;� not subject to property taxes, r NI ! �= it ^� ti "+r918 I ,,L l such as government buildings, .arr91+ schools, and places of worship. I P iii.. rOwl _ s. . . - m1u11g1r11 • w�, " '^°h•0.1241 nllef "Utilities" includes fixed sites 2020 Land Use Classes iii with infrastructure for g'"°`"`°"""" "°"""' " "" "°" "'"�,e °°"°� "°"'""""' Tree°'° �, %f + te.nd.mn I:',...mdi..„ Q yic.We• ix.ni'H-+, J•Y,.r:nrcl:L.• YLulamk iK va • Fktaam M A I electricity, sewer, and water. I i.],no ' m,rr..-,•d ., A�•�� - w ,.,. ,Y, IM',• ,u "Other" includes structures that "' � ,•r, I 1° do not fall into preceding rnF«ea. 46 categories. mm 0 Bomtlary .CI: :nd i Bounda� —Met., M —I-1 Mtn Pn,*IPou mry v� bixmt nt. [tr x�i° .R.., oROw• Figure SS.2:South St. Paul Land Use 2020,Metropolitan Council Table SS.4:Structural Inventory and Value,South St. Paul Use Type Number of Land Value Structural Value Total Value Structures Commercial $31,170,900 $53,229,500 $84,400,400 183 Exempt $52,047,100 $100,417,600 $152,464,700 296 Industrial $46,154,000 $115,235,500 $161,389,500 177 Other $96,700 $0 $96,700 2 Residential $406,478,400 $1,270,476,700 $1,676,955,100 11,831 Utilities $282,700 $1,760,800 $2,043,500 5 TOTAL $536,229,800 $1,541,120,100 $2,077,349,900 12,494 Page 252 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Vulnerability Vulnerable Populations Table SS.5 provides current estimates of populations in South St. Paul considered by FEMA to be at potentially increased risk during hazard events. Table SS.5:South St.Paul Potentially Vulnerable Populations,American Community Survey 2015-2019 Estimates Potentially Vulnerable South St. Paul, MN— Population Percentage(%) U.S. (%) U.S. Difference Under Age 5 6.7% 6.1% 0.6% Over Age 65 13.0% 13.7% -0.7% Below Federal Poverty Line 11.0% 13.4% -2.4% Living with a Disability 11.1% 15.6% -4.5% Vulnerability of Critical Assets to Hazards South St. Paul staff evaluated potential vulnerabilities of critical facilities to their hazards of concern, provided in Table SS.6. Figure SS.3 provides general locations for selected critical assets in South St. Paul. Table SS.6:South St.Paul Assessment of Critical Assets(Redacted in Public Version of Plan) V_ E 0 d'CS al N H C NC (0 C N i N 'O ` d c0 O E w +O+ s ` 0 4g y C LL N L N "O N in O � •— OD L Critical Facilities ` r " v V c o 'o v LL '" TE E `w > m — ° E F .. N C 0 O. N H m LL § 7 j ~ V X p ? 2 O • W V H V y0 Gl f0 Changes since the 2016 Plan City staff identified no significant land use changes and additions to critical facilities since the last plan update in 2016. Page 253 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Figure SS.3:City of South St. Paul—Critical Facilities(Redacted in Public Version of Plan National Flood Insurance Program Participation and Compliance Table SS.7 includes information on South St. Paul's participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Additional information follows about City compliance with the terms of the NFIP. Table SS.7:South St.Paul NFIP Participation Current Effective ' Policies Insurance Community CID Number Map Date In-force In-force • South St. Paul 270114 12/2/11 17 $11,652,400 Compliance: The City of South St. Paul Planning and Zoning Department monitors compliance with the terms of the City's floodplain management ordinance, which states: "No new structure or land shall hereafter be used and no structure shall be constructed, located, extended, converted, or structurally altered without full compliance with the terms of this Ordinance and other applicable regulations which apply to uses within the jurisdiction of this section. Within the Floodway and Flood Fringe districts, all uses not listed as permitted uses or conditional uses in subsections (d) and (e)that follow, respectively, shall be prohibited."The Ordinance covers permitted and prohibited uses, permitting processes, variances, non-conforming uses, and violations. Table SS.8 provides an inventory and assessed value of structures in the City of South St. Paul located within the digital flood insurance rate map (DFIRM) boundaries. Structures are listed by predominant land use categories. The table was compiled with data from the Dakota County Office of GIS and Assessor's Office. Page 254 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Table 55.8: Total Floodplain Structure and Value Inventory,South St. Paul Structure Type Estimated Land Value Estimated Building Value Total Value Total Structures Commercial $642,500 $99,700 $742,200 19 Exempt $843,800 $588,300 $1,432,100 6 Industrial $5,831,800 $10,013,900 $15,845,700 22 Total $7,318,100 $10,701,900 $18,020,000 47 Strategy Review and Development In 2021, South St. Paul staff reviewed strategies from the 2016 Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan for implementation progress(See Appendix III) and to identify strategies to carry forward into the 2022 Plan update as ongoing efforts or project that have not been completed. City staff considered and addressed FEMA requirements for: 1. A mitigation strategy that identifies and analyzes a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions and projects and further identifies which actions were selected for implementation 2. At least one strategy to reduce risk to buildings and infrastructure City staff also developed new strategies reflective of remaining concerns and vulnerabilities. Table SS.9 presents South St. Paul's strategies,with additional information on hazards addressed by the strategy, priority, lead implementation agency, and estimated costs. Table 55.9:South St. Paul All-Hazard Mitigation Plan Strategies SOUTH ST.PAUL MITIGATION STRATEGIES 1. Complete annual inspections on all high-risk properties and biennial inspections on all other businesses.* Priority: High Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Fire Inspection Program Hazards: Structural Fire Est. Cost/Funding Source: $100,000/Staff Time- Lead: South Metro Fire Dept. (SMFD), Commercial SMFD 2. Implement replacement plan for existing city outdoor weather sirens.Increase public awareness related to outdoor sirens. Priority: High Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Project development Hazards: Violent Storms,Tornado Est. Cost/Funding Source: up to$125,000/Police Lead: Public Safety, Police Chief Protection Budget 3. Continue updates of the City of South St. Paul Emergency Operations Plan. Priority: High Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing STAPLEE: High) Implementation: Emergency Operations Plan Hazards: All Est. Cost/Funding Source: $26,000/Police Lead: Public Safety, Police Chief Protection Budget Status/Completion: Existing-New/TBD Est. Cost/Funding Source: $4.8 Million/$2.4 M Implementation: Project development Grant,City Funds 4. Updates to firewalls with advanced intrusion detection/prevention capabilities. Priority: Med Status/Completion: Existing/ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Project development Hazards: Cyber Terrorism Est. Cost/Funding Source: $100,000/IT Budget Lead: Information Technology, Director 5. Complete$15 Million upgrade to Concord Street. Priority: Low Status/Completion: Existing/2022 STAPLEE: High Implementation: Project completion Hazards: Flash Flood Est. Cost/Funding Source: $1.5 Million/Federal Lead: Engineering,City Engineer Funding Anticipated Page 255 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 6. Complete City Hall/Police Department Building Security Plan to include a barrier/fencing plan. Priority: TBD Status/Completion: New/TBD STAPLEE: TBD Implementation: Project development from Plan Hazards: Civil Unrest Est. Cost/Funding Source: TBD/TBD Lead: Police Dept. Chief,City Engineer *Reduces risk to buildings or infrastructure ** Evaluated a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions; identified actions were selected for implementation Implementation Resources: Table SS.10 identifies South St. Paul staff resources and their roles in mitigation.Table SS.11 identifies resources related to processes and ordinances. Table SS.10:South St.Paul Mitigation Implementation Resources Department,Responsible General Role Processes and Tool for Implementing Mitigation Position Strategies Building Inspections, Building Building inspections, regulation Enforce safety restrictions including setbacks, Official,Joe Heimkes of new housing development building materials,spacing,and location to hydrants in new construction areas Planning and Zoning, Planning Zoning,development siting and Enforce floodplain ordinances and compliance, Director, Peter Hellegers restrictions, Comprehensive proper land use per ordinances Plans Police, Police Chief Public safety and law Emergency response; update and exercise EOP; William Messerich enforcement,emergency incident command training;training for public response safety, City,schools,and businesses Public Works,Public Works Development and operations City well inspections and maintenance, Director, Patrick Dunn of public infrastructure(roads, partnership with all city departments, level utilities) improvement projects Fire Department,South Metro Public and fire safety Inspect buildings for code compliance: annual Fire Chief, Mark Juelfs enforcement,emergency inspection of high-risk buildings, biennial response inspection of other businesses Table SS.11:South St.Paul Additional Implementation Resources Program/Ordinance/Study/ Adopted or Revised Method of incorporation into the hazard mitigation Technical Document plan Comprehensive Storm water January 2018 Planning document for local drainage system Management Plan 2022 2027 Capital Improvement December 2021 Infrastructure upgrades to support hazard mitigation Plan Allocates annual operational funding for 2022 Budget and Financial Plan December 2021 departments and staff implementing the City's mitigation strategies Emergency Operations Plan January 2021 Response, recovery,and mitigation plan;ongoing training Special Zoning Ordinance, Adopted: 11/7/2011 Floodplain map Revised Flood Map: Floodplain regulation 1/14/2013 Comprehensive Plan October 2020 Sets land use vision for community, provides existing and projected information Page 256 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 CITY OF SUNFISH LAKE Table SF1:Sunfish Lake Community Data blYdaie west South Population (2020): 522 Mendota 5t Paul St Paul Mendota�� Households: 179 Heights Fsut�fish Employment/Jobs: 5 "Ye` Grove Area: 1.7 Sq. Mi. Eagan Heights Major Land Uses: 39% Ag. & Undevel. 37% Residential Burnsville Apple rain er ValleyRosemount i 3% Park and Twp Hastings Recreation Coates -- - enna Community Type: Rural Residential Lakeville Empire Twp VermFlion T'a'p Harshen Twp Undeveloped Area: 39% Vermillion Twp Farmington Source:Metropolitan Council Community Profiles Hampton New Trier Miesvill Eureka Twp Castle Rock Twp Hazards of Concern Hampton Twp Douglas Trip Sunfish Lake officials evaluated potential hazards of Randolph Twp concern in their community, using the same rating ate rford Randolph Twp Scioto model used by Dakota County and other Greenvale Twp Tw N i s, roc roveI d participating cities. . ,io.thflad Figure SF.1:City of Sunfish Lake Location Table SF.2:Dakota County Hazard Rating Model Parameter Rating=1 Rating=2 Rating=3 Rating=4 Frequency Unlikely:<1%chance in Occasional: 1 to 10% Likely:>10 to<100% Highly Likely:100%chance 100 years chance in next year chance in next year in next year Warning Time More than 12 hours 6-12 hours 3-6 hours None-minimal Extent Localized Community-wide County-wide or greater Likely Impact Negligible Limited Critical Catastrophic Table SF.3:Sunfish Lake Hazard Rating Warning Geographic Likely Hazard Frequency Total _ Time Extent Impact Violent Summer Storms (e.g., wind, hail) 3 4 3 2 12 Tornado 2 4 3 _ 3 12 _ Wildfire 3 4 1 3 11 Terrorism 1 4 2 4 11 Drought 4 1 3 2 10 Structural Fire 3 4 1 2 10 Infectious Disease Outbreak/Pandemic 3 1 3 3 10 Violent Winter Storms 3 1 3 2 9 Extreme Heat or Cold 3 1 3 2 9 Hazardous Material Incidents 2 4 1 2 9 Water Supply Contamination 2 4 1 2 9 Wastewater Treatment Plant Failure 2 4 1 2 9 Civil Unrest 3 3 1 2 9 Flash Flood 1 4 1 2 8 Landslide 1 4 1 1 7 Cyber Threats 1 4 1 1 7 Overland Flood (spring snowmelt) 1 1 1 2 5 Dam Failure N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Page 257 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 General Land Use Figure SF.2 depicts general land 2020 Generalized Land Use use in Sunfish Lake, with Sunfish Lake undeveloped open space and ~�� Al residential (single-and multi- j I' family) being the predominant ': ` l i �, land uses. i Structural Inventory Value ~ Table SF.4 provides a current total and estimated value for structures in the Sunfish Lake. ' Data are from the Dakota County's Offices of Assessor ! n� Services and Geographic j i 414 Information Services. I Structures identified aslv i r. residential, commercial, i A industrial, and agricultural have 1 Ii/I the types of structures associated with those land uses. ��-i i "Exempt" includes all buildings ! I-. I not subject to property taxes, _�_,_,_,�,�._._,_,_,_ i.__._,_,_, - such as government buildings, lb ' Mk Appoa irme[cly 1 ine .0.21E856n,es schools, and places of worship. 2020 Land Use Classes 'I "Utilities" includes fixed sites with infrastructure for Pod and �n Other MI"-. electricity, sewer, and water. _____ -� • ~- "Other" includes structures that _ inry p.f,.. ry —•C,i, ,1:,:owns*Pv+nd•ne+ —Hw �—F Raia ey Pa;g1 Bounder, 46 do not fall into preceding I 5 W; plt1 categories. Figure SF.2:Sunfish Lake Land Use 2020,Metropolitan Council Table SF.4:Structural Inventory and Value,Sunfish Lake Use Type Number of Land Value Structural Value Total Value Structures Exempt $4,157,100 $3,989,900 $8,147,000 8 Residential $98,504,100 $125,359,900 $223,864,000 297 TOTAL $102,661,200 $129,349,800 $232,011,000 305 Page 258 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Vulnerability Vulnerable Populations Table SF.5 provides current estimates of populations in Sunfish Lake considered by FEMA to be at potentially increased risk during hazard events. Table SF.5:Sunfish Lake Potentially Vulnerable Populations,American Community Survey 2015-2019 Estimates Potentially Vulnerable Sunfish Lake, MN— Population Percentage(%) U.S. (%) U.S. Difference Under Age 5 4.2% 6.1% -1.9% Over Age 65 19.7% 13.7% 6.0% Below Federal Poverty Line 3.7% 13.4% -9.7% Living with a Disability 5.2% 15.6% -10.4% Vulnerability of Critical Assets to Hazards Sunfish Lake officials evaluated potential vulnerabilities of critical facilities to their hazards of concern, provided in Table SF.6. As a rural residential community with roads as the primary public infrastructure, nothing was identified as vulnerable to hazards or mapped in Figure 3. Table SF.6:Sunfish Lake Assessment of Critical Assets(Redacted in Public Version of Plan) C £ o v m c O O 'O O C C c - v LT.Lt. , v°1 0 .O •c c m 'Fs N Critical Facilities E 3 19 u c • o 0 3 LL E o N v N a co 1= — 2 E E co = 3 ; > x o v� o ti ai m C Changes since the 2016 Plan City staff identified no significant land use changes and additions to critical facilities since the last plan update in 2016. Page 259 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Figure SF.3: City of Sunfish Lake—Critical Facilities (Redacted in Public Version of Plan) National Flood Insurance Program Participation and Compliance The City of Sunfish Lake does not participate in the National Flood Insurance Program. A review of data from the Dakota County Office of GIS and Assessor's Office found no structures located within floodplains. Strategy Review and Development In 2021, Sunfish Lake representatives reviewed strategies from the 2016 Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan for progress (See Appendix Ill) and to identify strategies to carry forward into the 2022 Plan as ongoing or incomplete efforts. The City considered and addressed FEMA requirements for: 1. A mitigation strategy that identifies and analyzes a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions and projects and further identifies which actions were selected for implementation 2. At least one strategy to reduce risk to buildings and infrastructure City staff also developed new strategies reflective of remaining concerns and vulnerabilities. Table SF.7 presents Sunfish Lake's strategies, with additional information on hazards addressed by the strategy, priority, lead implementation agency, and estimated costs. Page 260 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Table SF.7:Sunfish Lake All-Hazard Mitigation Plan Strategies SUNFISH LAKE MITIGATION STRATEGIES 1. Stormwater Ponding Expansion and Maintenance Priority: Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing STAPLEE: Medium Implementation: Stormwater Management Plan, Hazards: Flash Flood Local Ordinance Lead: City Engineer Est. Cost/Funding Source: Varies/General Fund 2. Culvert/Drainage Improvements Priority: Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Stormwater Management Plan, Hazards: Flash Flood Local Ordinance Lead: City Engineer Est. Cost/Funding Source: Varies/General Fund 3. Obtain Drainage Easements Priority: Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing STAPLEE: Low Implementation: Stormwater Management Plan, Hazards: Flash Flood Local Ordinance Lead: City Engineer Est. Cost/Funding Source: Varies/General Fund 4. Enforce Burning Permits* Priority: Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Local Ordinance Hazards: Wildfire,Structural Fire Est. Cost/Funding Source: Varies/General Fund Lead: City Forester, Local Law Enforcement 5. Well Management Priority: Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing STAPLEE: Medium Implementation: Local Ordinance Hazards: Water Supply Contamination Est. Cost/Funding Source: Varies/General Fund Lead: Dakota County, MN Dept.of Health 6. Subsurface Sewage treatment System Maintenance Priority: Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing STAPLEE: Low Implementation: Local Ordinance Hazards: Flash Flood,Water Supply Contamination Est. Cost/Funding Source: Varies/General Fund Lead: City of Sunfish Lake *Reduces risk to buildings or infrastructure **Evaluated a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions;identified actions were selected for implementation Implementation Resources: Table SF.8 identifies Sunfish Lake resources and their roles in mitigation. Table SF.8:Sunfish Lake Mitigation Implementation Resources Department,Responsible Processes and Tool for Implementing Position General Role Mitigation Strategies Building inspections: Building Building inspections, regulation of new Enforce safety restrictions:setbacks, Inspector/Mike Andrejka housing development building materials, and fire suppression Planning/Zoning:City Zoning,development siting and Planner/Lori Johnson restrictions, Comprehensive Plans Floodplain ordinances and compliance Police:West St. Paul PD/Chief Public safety and law enforcement, Brian Sturgeon emergency response Response training,public safety education Public Works:City Development and operations of public City well inspection and maintenance Engineer/Jeff Sandberg infrastructure(roads, utilities) Fire Department: Mendota Public and fire safety enforcement, Inspect commercial structures for fire Heights FD/Dave Dreelan emergency response hazards Forestry Department Maintain healthy trees in city Page 261 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Table SF.9 identifies resources related to processes and ordinances. Table SF.9:Sunfish Lake Additional Implementation Resources Program/Ordinance/Study/Technical Adopted or Method of incorporation into the hazard mitigation plan Document Revised Comprehensive Plan 2020- Assessing development trends and future vulnerabilities. adopted Met council Provides inventory of land and water resources;water Storm Water Management Plan 2018 2018- resource management related goals and policies; adopted assessment of existing and potential water resource related concerns;and implementation priorities 2010- City Code,Article XII-Zoning Ordinance revised Used for assessing growth City Code,Article XII,Section 1216.04-Storm 2018- References drainage,erosion control,and storm sewer Water Management Ordinance revised system pollution prevention City Code,Article IV,Chapter 402 Subsurface 2010- Reference document related to preventing and controlling Sewage Treatment Systems revised water-borne diseases,groundwater related hazards,and public nuisance conditions Page 262 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 CITY OF VERMILLION Table V.1:Vermillion Community Data Lilydale"-west St Paul South Population (2020): 441 Mendota St Paul Mendota Households: 168 Heights Sunsh Employment/Jobs: 111 Inver Grove Area: 1.0 Sq. Mi. Eagan Heights Major Land Uses: 82% Ag. & Undevel. 13% Residential Burnsville Apple Nini er Valley Rosemount nY 2% Park and Rec. Twp Hastings Community Type: Rural Center `Oates Ravenna Undeveloped Area: 82% Lakeville EmplrnTwp Vernon Twl, Ma rshan Twp Source: Metropolitan Council Community Profiles Farmington Vermillion Twp Hazards of Concern Hampton New Trier Miesvi II Eureka Twp Castle Rock Twp Vermillion staff evaluated potential hazards of Hampton Twp Douglas Twp concern in their community, using the same rating Randolph Twp model used by Dakota County and other IlVeterford Randolph Scio participating cities. Greenvale Twp ""pp 1 . N.Lid lead . . .. .. ..- .' .. rv. Figure V.1:City of Vermillion Location Table V.2: Dakota County Hazard Rating Model Parameter Rating=1 Rating=2 Rating=3 Rating=4 Frequency Unlikely:<1%chance in Occasional: Ito 10% Likely:>10 to<100% Highly Likely:100%chance in 100 years chance in next year chance in next year next year Warning Time More than 12 hours 6-12 hours 3-6 hours None-minimal Extent Localized Community-wide County-wide or greater Likely Impact Negligible Limited Critical Catastrophic Table V.3:Vermillion Hazard Rating Hazard Frequency Warning Geographic Likely Total Time Extent Impact Violent Summer Storms (e.g., wind, hail) 2 3 2 3 10 Tornado 2 3 2 3 10 Violent Winter Storms 2 _ 3 2 3 10 Infectious Disease Outbreak/Pandemic 3 2 2 2 9 Terrorism 1 4 3 1 9 Wildfire 1 1 3 3 8 Extreme Heat or Cold 2 1 3 2 8 Structural Fire 1 4 1 1 7 Drought 1 1 3 1 6 Water Supply Contamination 2 1 2 1 6 Wastewater Treatment Plant Failure 2 1 2 1 6 Flash Flood 1 1 2 1 5 Civil Unrest 1 1 2 1 5 Cyber Threats 1 1 2 1 5 Overland Flood (spring snowmelt) 1 1 1 1 4 Landslide 1 1 1 1 4 Hazardous Material Incidents 1 1 1 1 4 Dam Failure 1 1 1 1 4 Page 263 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 General Land Use Figure V.2 depicts general land 2020 Generalized Land Use use in Vermillion, with Vermillion agriculture and open space being the predominant land use. Structural Inventory Value Table V.4 provides a current total and estimated value for structures in the City of i Vermillion. ■�Data are from the Dakota County's Offices of Assessor Services and Geographic OFR Information Services. { Structures identified as residential, commercial, industrial, and agricultural have the types of structures associated with those land uses. "Exempt" includes all buildings not subject to property taxes, such as government buildings, Rpproximx-oly 1 lrcn=0.144413 Hiles schools, and places of worship. 2020 Land Use Classes _ ■i "Utilities" includes fixed sites 36'°0"""•`.�"° " ."'-lt^""flWWJ „ ",susp x m "1th,srn' °^ vx>rxrva:xUer 1�.ibR4r r+;1Altalro�a1 �axa.o ax�x with infrastructure for srek=x M��,- a o p,,,,,end memo. ,�r NNW MI �x,;Iso,o A„MP,.x e k electricity, sewer, and water. • ='- • "Other" includes structures that 2.`20 Prvy L>.'s+::m xxfn ni+vrsdw Cc,nvn• eChe:fa•' +iib w3.A do not fall into preceding — Cep A9ov,d�ry --C4.y antl�.'��GM1IIB"M*4� —Road: rtti—IOOZ Parcel6o'rd" - w-� Mno rsm �� P�, •�• categories. Figure V.2:Vermillion Land Use 2020,Metropolitan Council Table V.4:Structural Inventory and Value,Vermillion Use Type Number of Land Value Structural Value Total Value Structures Agricultural $3,569,800 $663,600 $4,233,400 14 Commercial $775,600 $1,762,300 $2,537,900 13 Exempt $1,322,400 $2,456,800 $3,779,200 9 Industrial $160,700 $42,700 $203,400 2 Residential $10,214,500 $31,219,800 $41,434,300 208 TOTAL $16,043,000 $36,145,200 $52,188,200 246 Page 264 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Vulnerability Vulnerable Populations Table V.5 provides current estimates of populations in the City of Vermillion considered by FEMA to be at potentially increased risk during hazard events. Table V.5:Vermillion Potentially Vulnerable Populations,American Community Survey 2015-2019 Estimates Potentially Vulnerable Vermillion, MN— Population Percentage(%) U.S. (%) U.S. Difference Under Age 5 4.0% 6.1% -2.1% Over Age 65 15.6% 13.7% 1.9% Below Federal Poverty Line 2.6% 13.4% -10.8% Living with a Disability 12.8% 15.6% -2.8% Vulnerability of Critical Assets to Hazards Vermillion officials evaluated potential vulnerabilities of critical facilities to their hazards of concern, provided in Table V.6. Figure V.3 provides general locations for selected critical assets in Vermillion. Table V.6:Vermillion Assessment of Critical Assets(Redacted in Public Version of Plan) • c E O ✓ +r v m N N C C i. R -C O O ii -00 O O E v"i E iV y two ya N •u 0 2 C LL N i i L G) 7 -O y1 Critical Facilities � c — s v c 2 ME - o a, . . - 4+ E 8 C LL _ Q C) F U m hi X N _ H 0 W (.1 u▪ Y d CO C Changes since the 2016 Plan City staff identified no significant land use changes and additions to critical facilities since the last plan update in 2016. Page 265 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Figure V.3: City of Vermillion—Critical Facilities (Redacted in Public Version of Plan) National Flood Insurance Program Participation and Compliance Table V.7 includes information on the City of Vermillion's participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Additional information follows about City compliance with the terms of the NFIP. Table V.7:Vermillion NFIP Participation Current Effective Policies Insurance Community CID Number Map Date In-force In-force Vermillion 270115 12/2/11 1 $350,000 Compliance: The development of the flood hazard areas of the City of Vermillion could result in the potential loss of life and property, create health and safety hazards, and lead to extraordinary public expenditures for flood protection and relief. Since development of these areas is not essential to the orderly growth of the community, and since these lands are suitable for open space uses that do not require structures,fill, obstructions, or any other form of development as defined in Section 7.0 of this Ordinance, the City Council of the City of Vermillion does ordain as follows. This ordinance was adopted in 2011 and prepared by FEMA. A review of data from the Dakota County Office of GIS and Assessor's Office shows that no structures are located within the floodplain in Vermillion. Page 266 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Strategy Review and Development In 2021,Vermillion officials reviewed strategies from the 2016 Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan for implementation progress(See Appendix III) and to identify strategies to carry forward into the 2022 Plan update as ongoing efforts or project that have not been completed. City staff considered and addressed FEMA requirements for: 1. A mitigation strategy that identifies and analyzes a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions and projects and further identifies which actions were selected for implementation 2. At least one strategy to reduce risk to buildings and infrastructure City staff also developed new strategies reflective of remaining concerns and vulnerabilities. Table V.8 presents Vermillion's strategies,with additional information on hazards addressed by the strategy, priority, lead implementation agency, and estimated costs. Table V.8:Vermillion All-Hazard Mitigation Plan Strategies VERMILLION MITIGATION STRATEGIES 1. Maintain road grading. Priority: First Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: As needed Hazards: Flash Flood Est. Cost/Funding Source: Varies/City Budget Lead: Street Department,Superintendent 2. Maintain outdoor warning sirens. Priority: Second Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing,Yearly STAPLEE: High Implementation: Yearly inspections Hazards: Violent Storm,Tornado Est. Cost/Funding Source: Varies/City Budget Lead: TBD 3. Maintain outdoor burning restrictions.* Priority: Third Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing,Yearly STAPLEE: High Implementation: Quarterly Newsletter Hazards: Wildfire Est. Cost/Funding Source: Varies/City Budget Lead: City Council 4. Outfit well with generator outlet. Priority: Fourth Status/Completion: Existing/TBD STAPLEE: High Implementation: TBD Hazards: Water Supply(power outage) Est. Cost/Funding Source: TBD/City Budget Lead: Water Department,Superintendent 5. Continue water tower inspection. Priority: Fifth Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: As needed Hazards: Water Supply,structural integrity Est. Cost/Funding Source: /City Budget Lead: Water Department,Superintendent *Reduces risk to buildings or infrastructure **Evaluated a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions;identified actions were selected for implementation Implementation Resources: Table V.9 identifies Vermillion resources and their roles in mitigation. Table V.9:Vermillion Mitigation Implementation Resources Department,Responsible General Role Processes and Tool for Implementing Mitigation Position Strategies Building Inspection: Building inspections, regulation of Enforce safety restrictions including setbacks and Inspectron, Inc. new housing development building materials Planning/Zoning:City Zoning,development siting and Enforce floodplain ordinances and compliance Planning Commission restrictions, Comprehensive Plans Page 267 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Department,Responsible General Role Processes and Tool for Implementing Mitigation Position Strategies Police: Dakota County Public safety and law enforcement, Emergency response; update and exercise EOP; Sheriff emergency response incident command training;training for public safety,City,schools,and businesses Vermillion Public Works Develop/operate public City well inspections and maintenance infrastructure(roads, utilities) Fire Department: Hastings Public and fire safety enforcement, Inspect buildings for code compliance:annual FD emergency response inspection of high risk buildings, biennial inspection of other businesses Table V.10 identifies resources related to processes and ordinances. Table V.10:Vermillion Additional Implementation Resources Program/Ordinance/Study/Technical Adopted or Document Revised Method of incorporation into the hazard mitigation plan Capital Improvement Program 2010 Infrastructure upgrades to support hazard mitigation Annual Budget annually Allocates annual operational funding for departments and staff implementing the City's mitigation strategies Special Zoning Ordinance, Floodplain map 2011 Floodplain regulation Comprehensive Plan 2009 Sets land use vision for community, provides existing and projected information Page 268 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 CITY OF WEST ST. PAUL Table WS.1:West St. Paul Community Data Li lydaIv rest South Population (2020): 20,615 Mendota tPa st pawl Mendota Sunfish 8,996 Heights Sam Employment/Jobs: 7,279 Inver Grove Area: 5.0 Sq. Mi. Eagan Heights Major Land Uses: 60% Residential 14% Park and Rec. Burnsville Apple Valley Rosemount NM finger _ 11% Commercial Twp Hastings Community Type: Urban Center `Hates Ravenna Undeveloped Area: 2% Lakeville Empire Twp Vermillion Marshan Twp Twp Source: Metropolitan Council Community Profiles Farmington Vermillion Twp L Hampton New Trier Hazards of Concern Eureka Twp Castle Rock Twp Mies>ille West St. Paul staff evaluated potential hazards of Hampton Ywp Douglas Twp concern in their community, using the same rating Randolph Twp Waterfori Randolph model used by Dakota County and other Twp sdnta Greenvale Twp participating cities. I I Twp Northr.ld " .. ' . . .. .. Figure WS.1:City of West St. Paul Location Table WS.2: Dakota County Hazard Rating Model Parameter Rating=1 Rating=2 Rating=3 Rating=4 Frequency Unlikely:<1%chance in Occasional: Ito 10% Likely:>10 to<100% Highly Likely: 100%chance in 100 years chance in next year chance in next year next year Warning Time More than 12 hours 6-12 hours 3-6 hours None-minimal Extent Localized Community-wide County-wide or greater Likely Impact Negligible Limited Critical Catastrophic Table WS.3:West St. Paul Hazard Rating Hazard Frequency Warning Geographic Likely Total Time Extent Impact Water Supply Contamination 3 4 2 3 12 Terrorism 2 4 2 4 12 Structural Fire 4 4 1 2 11 Cyber Threats 3 4 1 3 11 Violent Summer Storms (e.g., wind, hail) 3 3 2 2 10 Tornado 2 4 1 3 10 Extreme Heat or Cold 4 1 3 2 10 Hazardous Material Incidents 3 4 1 2 10 Infectious Disease Outbreak/Pandemic 3 1 3 3 10 Wastewater Treatment Plant Failure 2 4 1 3 10 Civil Unrest 3 4 1 2 10 Flash Flood 2 4 1 2 9 Violent Winter Storms 3 1 2 2 8 Wildfire 1 4 1 2 8 Landslide 1 4 1 2 8 Overland Flood (spring snowmelt) 1 1 3 2 7 Drought 2 1 3 1 7 Dam Failure 1 4 1 1 7 Page 269 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 General Land Use Figure WS.2 depicts general 2020 Generalized Land Use land use in West St. Paul, with West St.Paul residential (single-and multi ■■■rll■ME■■N ■e �rw�M� Y) being predominant • ■■■■ill• immiim�amum .. family) the � ��` �'�.. land use. _:Emu= Al MI oo■ ■ `,,,, Structural Inventory r, i ir! j . iu • i ' i - , Value A 1111117� u ll 6 ,. Table WS.4 provides a current • it i111 �1111F,En total and esmated value forkW �'' ��I�;` iii-t. , . . .• i , .. structures in the West St. Paul. KAr__,- iii ..��11 Data are from the Dakota �— m . Ill�� - County's Offices of Assessor .� ilitm A ? "II Services and Geographic 7IF ENllIV iiiiiii4th H., Andel Information Services. �_ �f V�` ism Structures identified as le.14.Al III.* l��ell residential, commercial, I J- . • industrial, and agricultural have I ja a , -- 01 the types of structures III . [ Iii associated with those land uses. illi"Exempt" includes all buildings i xdib Li =. �_�.,schools, and places of worship. Apprmnn.etefr 1100•0.336149 mles "Utilities" includes fixed sites 2020 Land Use Classes !1 with infrastructure for ",.'°:.7-- — . ..,, i�dr:".,_.,,, me electricity, sewer, and water. ...�r��:b -,---- -- R.uteda. , rd.; .�.:: a R.. ., .�,.,.. ..r ■NA,H.�.,..� ... L 1,.,.p Pnrk "Other" includes structures that o Me IM 1,0[�eH ■G.tCo...� o.41 do not fall into precedingAA C...;J Gwnd.ry .n Townshp B"nthrm' —Radsyx tt lIttg,ma —Parodaeuntle' METS�1OUTAi categories. ,..., „,.:a:, - r, .° �°.� Figure WS.2:West St.Paul Land Use 2020,Metropolitan Council Table WS.4:Structural Inventory and Value,West St.Paul Use Type Number of Land Value Structural Value Total Value 1 Structures Commercial $115,502,600 $133,116,900 $248,619,500 236 Exempt $62,141,600 $123,902,000 $186,043,600 186 Industrial $14,285,600 $35,968,100 $50,253,700 39 Other $600 $2,500 $3,100 1 Residential $429,702,000 $1,445,368,300 $1,875,070,300 8,282 TOTAL $621,632,400 $1,738,357,800 $2,359,990,200 8,744 Page 270 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Vulnerability Vulnerable Populations Table WS.5 provides current estimates of populations in West St. Paul considered by FEMA to be at potentially increased risk during hazard events. Table WS.5:West St. Paul Potentially Vulnerable Populations,American Community Survey 2015-2019 Estimates Potentially Vulnerable West St. Paul, MN- Population Percentage (%) U.S. (%) U.S. Difference Under Age 5 6.0% 6.1% -0.1% Over Age 65 17.4% 13.7% 3.7% Below Federal Poverty Line 13.4% 13.4% 0.0% Living with a Disability 14.1% 15.6% -1.5% Vulnerability of Critical Assets to Hazards West St. Paul staff evaluated potential vulnerabilities of critical facilities to their hazards of concern, provided in Table WS.6. Dam Failure was found to be of no consequence to critical facilities. Figure WS.3 provides general locations for selected critical assets in West St. Paul. Table WS.6:West St. Paul Assessment of Critical Assets(Redacted in Public Version of Plan) C 0 N c ++ N N i N "6 £ N al e £ y Cto 1- in Critical Facilities c 3 c " �' 3 c `2 0 3 a `- T c0 ' = r a v 12 a 3 v m E f0 w H 0 {L d f0 Changes since the 2016 Plan City staff identified land use changes and additions to critical facilities since the last plan update in 2016: • Improved Roadways-Improvements to main roadways (Robert Street) are ongoing. • Communications-Enhanced communications with residents in various media platforms is ongoing. • Pumping/Lift Stations-Ongoing station upgrades and technology improvements to ensure more consistent flow, especially during heavy rains, and improved monitoring of these pumping stations. • I/I Program-The City and the residents continue participating in an inflow and infiltration program to reduce excess and unnecessary water flowage into the sanitary sewer system. • City Facilities and Parks-plans to improve security and safety of public facilities. Page 271 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Figure WS.3: City of West St. Paul—Critical Facilities(Redacted in Public Version of Plan) National Flood Insurance Program Participation and Compliance Table WS.7 includes information on West St. Paul's participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Additional information follows about City compliance with the terms of the NFIP. Table WS.7:West St. Paul NFIP Participation Current Effective Policies Insurance Community CID Number Map Date In-force In-force West St. Paul 270729 (NSFHA) 10 $2,560,000 Compliance: Data from the County Office of GIS and Assessor's Office showed no structures within DFIRM boundaries. Page 272 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Strategy Review and Development In 2021, West St. Paul staff reviewed strategies from the 2016 Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan for implementation progress (See Appendix III) and to identify strategies to carry forward into the 2022 Plan update as ongoing efforts or projects that have not been completed. City staff considered and addressed FEMA requirements for: 1. A mitigation strategy that identifies and analyzes a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions and projects and further identifies which actions were selected for implementation 2. At least one strategy to reduce risk to buildings and infrastructure City staff also developed new strategies reflective of remaining concerns and vulnerabilities. Table WS.8 presents West St. Paul's strategies, with additional information on hazards addressed by the strategy, priority, lead implementation agency, and estimated costs. Table WS.8:West St. Paul All-Hazard Mitigation Plan Strategies WEST ST. PAUL MITIGATION STRATEGIES 1. Mutual aid interagency agreements. Priority: High Status/Completion: NA/Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Emergency Preparedness Plan Hazards: All Est. Cost/Funding Source: Staff Time/General Lead: Emergency Mgmt., Police& Fire,Chiefs Budget 2. Continuity of Operations Planning. Priority: Medium Implementation: Emergency Preparedness Plan, STAPLEE: High update with quarterly meeting Hazards: All Est. Cost/Funding Source: Staff Time/General Lead: Emergency Management, Director Budget Status/Completion: Existing/2019,Ongoing 3. Site Emergency Plans(pre-planning). Priority: Medium Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing STAPLEE: Medium Implementation: All City Departments Hazards: All Est. Cost/Funding Source: Staff Time/General Lead: City Departments, Managers Budget 4. Stormwater pond expansion and maintenance. Priority: Medium Status/Completion: Existing-/Ongoing STAPLEE: Medium Implementation: City Ordinance,State Law Hazards: Flash Flood Est. Cost/Funding Source: Staff Time/City, Lead: Public Works, Director owners,grants 5. Inflow and infiltration repair and replacement of infrastructure. Priority: Medium Status/Completion: Existing-New/Ongoing STAPLEE: Medium Implementation: City Ordinance,State Law Hazards: Flash Flood Est. Cost/Funding Source: $200,000 yearly/ Lead: Public Works, Director City, Property owners,grants 6. Familiarization and maintenance of personal protection equipment(PPE). Priority: High Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Department Policy Hazards: Hazmat, Infectious Disease Incidents Est. Cost/Funding Source: Staff Time/General Lead: Police and Fire Departments, Chiefs Budget 7. Mission critical and vulnerability assessment. Priority: Medium Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing STAPLEE: Medium Implementation: County-City Joint Powers Hazards: Infectious Disease, Public Health Agreements Emergencies Est. Cost/Funding Source: Staff Time/General Lead: Public Works, Director Budget Page 273 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 8. General maintenance and backup systems for lift stations. Priority: Medium Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Department Policy Hazards: WWTP Failure Est. Cost/Funding Source: Staff Time/General Lead: Public Works, Director Budget 9. Provide public education and awareness for emergencies. Priority: Medium Implementation: Emergency Preparedness STAPLEE: High Plans Hazards: All Est. Cost/Funding Source: Staff Time/General Lead: Police and Fire Depts., Chiefs Budget Status/Completion: Existing-/Ongoing 10. Continue to use and enforce Land Use Planning for hazard avoidance. Priority: Medium Status/Completion: Existing-/Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Zoning Ordinance Hazards: All Est. Cost/Funding Source: Staff Time/General Lead: Community Development, Director Budget 11. Educate the public on family disaster plans and supply kits. Priority: Medium Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Emergency Preparedness Hazards: All Plans Lead: Police and Fire Depts., Chiefs Est. Cost/Funding Source: Staff Time/NA 12. Burning restriction enforcement. Priority: Medium Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: City Ordinances, Fire Code Hazards: Structural Fire,Wildfire Est. Cost/Funding Source: Staff Time/General Lead: Fire Dept., Chief Budget 13. Fireworks regulation enforcement. Priority: Medium Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing STAPLEE: Medium Implementation: City Ordinances,State Law Hazards: Structural Fire,Wildfire Est. Cost/Funding Source: Staff Time/General Lead: Fire Dept., Chief Budget 14. Waste disposal regulation enforcement. Priority: Low Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing STAPLEE: Medium Implementation: City Ordinances Hazards: Structural Fire,Wildfire Est. Cost/Funding Source: Staff Time/General Lead: Code Enforcement Budget 15. Establish a process to increase monitoring of identified MANPADS sites. Priority: Medium Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing STAPLEE: Medium Implementation: CIKR Planning Hazards: Terrorism Est. Cost/Funding Source: Staff Time/General Lead: Police Dept., Chief Budget, possible TSA grants 16. Driver safety education for winter storms. Priority: Medium Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing STAPLEE: Medium Implementation: Hazards: Winter Storms Est. Cost/Funding Source: Staff Time/General Lead: Police Dept., Chief Budget 17. Develop a common operating resource database through local deployment of WebEOC. Priority: Low Status/Completion: New/Ongoing STAPLEE: Low Implementation: Emergency Preparedness Plan Hazards: All Est. Cost/Funding Source: Staff Time/Civil Lead: Police and Fire Depts., Public Works Defense Budget Page 274 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 18. Enforce city ordinance restricting open grills on apartment balconies. Priority: Medium Implementation: City Ordinance, Fire Code STAPLEE: Medium enforcement Hazards: Structural Fire Est. Cost/Funding Source: Staff Time/General Lead: Fire Depts.,Chief Budget Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing 19. Annual outdoor siren maintenance program. Priority: Medium Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing STAPLEE: Medium Implementation: Emergency Preparedness Plan Hazards: Summer Storms,Tornado, Hazmat Est. Cost/Funding Source: $1,000 yearly/ Incidents General Budget Lead: Police Dept., Chief 20. Emergency response personnel specialized abilities and training(SOT). Priority: Low Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing STAPLEE: Low Implementation: Police, Fire Departments Hazards: Haz Mat,Terrorism, Civil unrest, Est. Cost/Funding Source: TBD/Grants,City Structural Collapse Training Budgets Lead: Various City Departments, Managers 21. Inspect business and multifamily occupancies. Priority: Medium Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing STAPLEE: High Implementation: Department Policy,City Code Hazards: Structural Fire, Hazmat Incidents Est. Cost/Funding Source: Staff Time/General Lead: Community Development, Fire Budget Department 22. Building construction and code enforcement. Priority: High Status/Completion: Existing-additional/ STAPLEE: High Ongoing Hazards: Summer Storms,Tornado Implementation: Code enforcement Lead: Community Development Est. Cost/Funding Source: Staff Time/General Budget 23. Adopt IPMC code(simpler,increased compliance).* Priority: Medium STAPLEE: High Implementation: Building Code Hazards: Structural Fire, Hazmat Incidents Est. Cost/Funding Source: Staff Time/General Lead: Building Official Budget Status/Completion: Existing-New/2018, Ongoing 24. Conduct business and rental inspections.* Priority: Low Status/Completion: Existing-New/Ongoing STAPLEE: Low Implementation: City Resolution Hazards: Structural Fire, Hazmat Incidents Est. Cost/Funding Source: Staff Time/General Lead: Community Development, Director Budget 25. Evaluate and reduce cyber threat potential.* Priority: Low Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing STAPLEE: Medium Implementation: Department Policy Hazards: Cyber-Attack Est. Cost/Funding Source: Staff Time/General Lead: Information Technology Manager Budget,Grants *Reduces risk to buildings or infrastructure **Evaluated a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions;identified actions were selected for implementation Page 275 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Implementation Resources: Table WS.9 identifies West St. Paul staff resources and their roles in mitigation.Table WS.10 identifies resources related to processes and ordinances that will assist the implementation of mitigation strategies. Table WS.9:West St. Paul Mitigation Implementation Resources Department,Responsible General Role Processes and Tool for Implementing Position Mitigation Strategies Building Inspections, Building Building inspections, regulation of new Enforce safety restrictions including setbacks, Official (D.Schilling) housing development building materials, and fire suppression systems Planning and Zoning,City Zoning,development siting and Floodplain ordinances and compliance Planner(M.Sonnek) restrictions,Comp. Plans Police, Police Chief(B. Public safety,emergency response, Sturgeon) law enforcement Response training, public safety education Public Works,Public Works Development and operations of public Infrastructure maintenance Director(R. Beckwith) infrastructure Fire Department,South Public and fire safety enforcement, Metro Fire Chief(M.Juelfs) emergency response Inspect commercial structures for fire hazards Develop communication networks, Communications,Specialist General and emergency public dissemination, and advance emergency (D. Nowicki) communications notifications Emergency Management, Develop,communicate,and practice response Director(B.Sturgeon) Emergency response preparedness plans and strategies Table WS.10:West St. Paul Additional Implementation Resources Program/Ordinance/Study/Technical Adopted or Document Revised Method of incorporation into the hazard mitigation plan Emergency Operations Plan 2020 Used city-wide for Emergency Operations Public Safety Mutual Aid Document:South Fire 2008 Guides neighboring cities in providing public safety Metro Fire Department assistance to each other during emergencies Public Works Mutual Aid Document Guides neighboring cities in providing public works assistance to each other during emergencies. Updated West St. Paul 2040 Comprehensive Plan 2020 Provides overall direction for future land use, transportation, housing,and infrastructure Zoning Ordinance 1996-2016 Building standards,setbacks,development plan review Comprehensive Sewer Plan 2009-2020 Infrastructure improvement information _ Building and Fire Codes 2018,2020 Standards for new construction and remodeling; MN Version IBC and IFC City Code: Construction Licensing, Permits Adopts the State Building Code and articulates an and Regulations(Code 150). On-going inspection process City Code, Chapter 917,adoption of the SMFD fire code On-going Reference regarding grill ordinance Capital Improvement Program Annual Review Infrastructure upgrades to support hazard mitigation Police Department Policy Manual On-going Gives direction for PD staff at emergency incidents South Metro Fire Department Policy Manual On-going Gives direction for FD staff at emergency incidents Water Quality and Wetland Management 2006 Flood control reference, pond sediment removal Plan Surface Water Management Plan 2018 Flood management reference Page 276 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Program/Ordinance/Study/Technical Adopted or Method of incorporation into the hazard mitigation plan Document Revised Water Supply Distribution Report and Reference document related to drinking water Water Supply Plan (St. Paul Regional protection hazard;West St. Paul obtains its water from Water Dist.) SPRWD Water Resource Management Plan 2006 Used for Evaluating storm water issues and CIP improvements NPDES Permit 2020 Manage the City's storm water facilities Cyber-Audit, BCA Audit,Vulnerability Assessment Vulnerability of systems Page 277 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 DAKOTA COUNTY FIRE CHIEFS ASSOCIATION The Dakota County Fire Chiefs Association is a cooperative organization for city fire departments in Dakota County: • Apple Valley Fire Department • Burnsville Fire Department • Eagan Fire Department • Farmington Fire Department (Farmington and the townships of Castle Rock, Empire, and Eureka) • Hastings Fire Department (Cities of Hastings,Vermillion, and surrounding townships) • Inver Grove Heights Fire Department • Lakeville Fire Department (Lakeville and the surrounding area) • Mendota Heights Fire Department (Lilydale, Mendota, Mendota Heights and Sunfish Lake) • Randolph-Hampton Fire District (Hampton, Randolph, parts of six rural townships) • Rosemount Fire Department • South Metro Fire Department (South St. Paul and West St. Paul) Structural fire mitigation strategies led by the Association include the following: DAKOTA COUNTY FIRE CHIEFS ASSOCIATION MITIGATION STRATEGIES Goal 1:Protect Structures from Fire 1. Evaluate ordinances requiring prompt removal of snow around commercial and industrial buildings in order to ensure access for fire and other emergency equipment with cities and townships. Priority: Medium Implementation: City code evaluation and Hazards: Structural Fire improvement Lead: Dakota County Fire Chiefs Association Est. Cost/Funding Source: Staff Time/General Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing Budget 2. Work with cities and townships to identify roadways of insufficient width to handle fire trucks and establish priorities and approaches for addressing deficiencies. Priority: Medium Implementation: Needs evaluation, project Hazards: Structural Fire identification; capital planning,engineering,and Lead: Dakota County Fire Chiefs Association implementation Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing Est. Cost/Funding Source: Staff Time/General Budget Cooperating Partners: Dakota County Office of Planning, Dakota County Transportation Department, Dakota County Board,city planning and zoning commissions,city councils,township officials,and various fire departments Goal 2: Work Toward an Education and Informed Public on Fire Safety 1. Work through Dakota County Fire Chiefs Association and participating cities to provide public education to a)youth,focusing on stoves,smoke detectors,fire safety,and evacuation;and b)homeowners,focusing on chimney inspections,electrical systems,flammable materials,heating systems,household chemicals,and evacuation. Priority: Medium Implementation: Outreach campaigns,shared Hazards: Structural Fire informational materials. Lead: Dakota County Fire Chiefs Association Est. Cost/Funding Source: Staff Time/General Status/Completion: Existing/Ongoing Budget Cooperating Partners: Dakota County Emergency Management personnel,school systems,county news media, and non-profit organizations Page 278 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 APPENDIX I: RESOLUTIONS OF PARTICIPATION AND ADOPTION To be added at plan completion. Page 279 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Page 280 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 APPENDIX II. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT FINDINGS The public was engaged throughout the plan update process. Because of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, virtual methods to seek public comments and the online survey became primary engagement tools. The pandemic also provided engagement opportunities, such as distribution of hazard mitigation fact sheets with the survey link at county-operated vaccination clinics. Before the delta variant-related surge, staff provided information on the plan and home preparedness at the Dakota County Fair(August). Online Survey More than 1,000 people who live or work in Dakota County completed the ADA-accessible online survey through mid-September 2021. Question 1: Do you have a safe place to be on your property/residence during a natural disaster, such as severe storms or a tornado? Response Percent Yes 95% No 2% I'm not sure 3% Question 2: If evacuation was necessary, I or someone else in my family would need physical assistance to leave my home. Response Percent Yes 5% No 92% Not Sure 3% Question 3: How concerned are you that the following hazards could happen in your community? The following chart weighted the total number of responses as follows:very concerned=3, moderately concerned=2, and not concerned =1. Infectious disease/Pandemic(2.2) i Winter storms(2.0) Drought(2.0) Cyber attack(2.0) ■ Severe summer storms(2.0) i Tornadoes(1.9) i Civil unrest(1.9) Water supply contamination(1.9) ■ Extreme temperatures(1.8) i Structural fire(1.8) Hazmat incidents(1.7) Terrorism(1.6) ■ Wastewater plant failure(1.6) Wildfires(1.5) ■ Flash floods(1.4) ■ Overland floods(1.2) Landslides(1.1) • Dam/Levee failure(1.1) 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 •Very Concerned •Moderately Concerned Not Concerned •Not Sure/Don't Know Figure A2.1:Question 3 Graph Page 281 D RAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Question 4:You may need to survive on your own after a disaster. Emergency management experts recommend having enough food, water, and other supplies to last until help arrives. How prepared is your immediate family for an emergency? Response Percent Less than 3-day supply 19% 3-day supply 35% More than a 3-day supply 46% Question 5:Which hazard preparation measures has your household taken?Check all that apply. Hazard Preparation Measures Percent Installed smoke detectors on every floor 94% Installed carbon monoxide detectors on every floor 79% Replace batteries in detectors annually 76% Keep a First Aid kit in home or car 74% Fire extinguisher(s)are onsite 72% Signed up for countywide notification system through 911 dispatch center 44% Bought hazard insurance(renter's,enhanced homeowner's,or flood) 36% Bought a National Weather Service weather radio or battery-operated radio 30% Completed First Aid/CPR training in the last year 29% Prepared a Disaster Supply Kit for sheltering in place if necessary 12% Prepared a Household Emergency Plan 10% Assembled a family"Go Kit" in case of evacuation for several days 9% Attended community meetings or events 7% Additional measures added by respondents include: • Staying current with events, politics,weather • Purchased weapons and ammunition • Survival training • Bought a generator • Emergency phone numbers on refrigerator,emergency binder,and in phones • Determined who goes to be with whom and a meet-up place Question 6: I cannot afford to buy detectors,fire extinguishers, radios,first aid kits, or other items mentioned in the last question. Response Percent Yes 6% No 94% Question 7: During an emergency, where do you get information on what to do? Check all that apply. Response Percent Local media 23% Friends,family,or neighbors 17% Employer(when in the workplace) 17% Smart phone app 16% Social media 14% Government website 12% Page 282 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Additional sources added by respondents include: • Radio • SMS notification • Reliable social media outlets only • American Red Cross and University of Minnesota • City-sponsored neighborhood association • Amateur radio • Boy Scouts Question 8: Before disasters, where do you get information about how to prepare? Check all that apply. Response Percent Local media (TV, radio, newspaper) 25% Emergency preparedness websites(FEMA, NWS, Red Cross, MN Health Department) 15% Social media 15% Dakota County or City website 14% Email notice 12% Brochure or fact sheet sent in the mail 5% Information sent home from school with my child 5% Information sent with a utility bill 5% Public meetings/events 3% Question 9:What level of priority should Hazard Mitigation Plans assign to each of these actions? Protecting hospitals,transportation,fire stations,utilities(2.9) I Strengthening emergency response(police,EMS,fire)(2.7) I' Coordinating services among agencies,schools,businesses(2.5) Educating residents about hazards and how to prepare(2.4) Protecting the natural environment(2.3) ■ Preventing development in hazard-prone areas(2.2) 1 Protecting private property(2.0) • Protecting historic and cultural landmarks(1.8) 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 •High Priority •Moderate Priority Low Priority •No Priority Not Sure Figure A2.2: Question 9 Graph Question 10: Except for monthly siren tests, when you hear a severe weather warning siren in your community, do you: (please check all that apply) Response Percent Check cellphone for more information 35% Turn on the TV or radio to find out what's going on 33% Go outside and look at the sky 16% Immediately take shelter if outside 13% Do nothing 2% Page 283 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Question 11: In which city or township do you live? Response Percent Any township in Dakota County 4% Apple Valley 7% Burnsville 6% Eagan 7% Farmington 5% Hastings 13% I live outside of Dakota County 29% Inver Grove Heights 4% Lakeville 12% Lilydale, Mendota, or Mendota Heights 1% Not sure <1% Rosemount 6% Rural cities (Coates, Hampton, Miesville, New Trier, Randolph,Vermillion) 1% South St. Paul 2% West St. Paul or Sunfish Lake 2% Question 12: What is your gender? Response Percent Female 62% Male 33% Non-binary/another gender <1% I prefer not to say 5% Question 13: Are you Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino? Answer % Yes 3% No 97% Question 14: Please mark one or more races to indicate what race(s)you consider yourself to be. Answer % American Indian or Alaskan Native 1% Asian,Asian Indian or Pacific Islander 2% Black or African American 2% White 91% Other 4% Question 15: Which category includes your age? Answer % Under 30 6% 30-44 32% 45-59 43% 60 or older 16% I choose not to respond 3% Page 284 D R A F T Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Intercepts II Library Displays fp Interactive displays were posted for several weeks �4' during 2021 at six branches of the Dakota County 2021 All-Hazard Mitigation Plan Library System,with branches selected to provide geographic and demographic representation. The Which of these hazards are your greatest concerns? boards consisted of an exercise for people to place a Pfeaseplacea dote next to the six hazards that are your greatest sticky dot next to no more than six hazards of concerns for the plan to address. greatest concern to them. Hazards Priority Concern The libraries included: Severe!Storms, or Winter :R•:•.:::VS..'•*i•I••re :Storms.Tornadoes ••••■•••r•.11 ••■.••• • Burnhaven, Burnsville ■•••••••••••• sir. • Extreme Temperature:: •• ••••••■••••••r • Farmington, Farmington **Ss, ■ ■ ••••• Galaxie,Apple Valley • • pp Flood(spring and flash) • •••• Pleasant Hill, Hastings ••• • • Wentworth,West St. Paul Drought •••me* •••••••a•• •'• ■• • • •••••• •r • Wescott, Eagan • •• •O.lie• Infectious •■• ■ ■ •■••••• ••• Disease/Pandemic •r•••04•l ••••�• • An estimated 331 library visitors participated in the — i••••••• ■• • ■ exercise. The followintable includes results from Hazardous Material Release • ■••••••�•r•�•• • • ••• •■ • ••• • each branch,and a combined total.Water supply ■••••••Y••.■•••• ■■ 2:1 Water Supply Contamination ••• •■:••r •••■ •r .}• contamination emerged as the top concern for •••ls ••■■•••■ participants,followed by severe storms,extreme Building Fire =:pt• • temperatures,cyber-attack, pandemic,and civil •••• • ;••• ■ unrest,all identified as a major concern by at least 'Terrorism •:�••■:• ••• i• half of participants. Water supply contamination ;•••• ■•••••••••■s•■••■1 •� er Attack •• • •■4.:■■ i A■•r••- „_ was not identified as the top concern by participants ii• eie••es.�ii'ii06•r•••�= in the online survey,although the remaining results Disturbance/Riot •••:••••••■••••.•► g■,•,• are mostly consistent between the two public opinion pieces. Figure A2.3: Burnhaven Library Intercept,2021 Intercept Board Summary Hazard Burnhaven Farmington Galaxie Hastings Wentworth Wescott Total Water Contamination 92 47 63 44 58 26 330 Severe Storms,Tornadoes 75 33 64 31 41 25 269 Extreme Temperatures 47 21 62 28 45 17 220 CyberAttack 68 _ 23 49 20 38 19 217 Pandemic/Infectious Disease 51 23 43 23 32 16 188 Civil Disturbance 65 19 37 23 35 6 185 Hazmat Release 42 14 33 19 36 13 157 Drought 44 24 39 20 14 141 Terrorism 25 22 26 7 7 5 92 Flood(spring or flash) 14 22 22 6 9 9 82 Building Fire 11 4 22 5 4 4 50 Maximum 92 47 64 44 58 26 331 Page 285 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 Vaccination Clinic Flyers A flyer was distributed at County COVID-19 vaccination clinics in the spring, as people entered the 15-minute post- vaccination observation area. The flyer included a web link and Q-R code to the County's online survey. While You Wait... Please take a few minutes to participate in a Dakota County survey. Dakota County is updating its All Hazard Mitigation Plan,to reduce !I risks to life and property from hazards,such as severe weather events,flooding,and infectious disease outbreaks.The plan is required to maintain eligibility for federal disaster relief funding. The plan was last updated in 2016,and the world has seen °West known photograph significant changes since then- Concerns and ideas from the public of a tornado,1884 are an important part of this plan update. We hope you'll take a few minutes to complete an online survey and tell us about your hazard concerns. All information is confidential. 0 i ;oil .1. To participate in the survey,focus your phone camera on the IN adjacent Q-R Code and tap the link that comes up. •Qo 0 { 479',_ or ale,. t For more information on the plan,visit wc..:...:• ..• i �.j. : . � + � and search"All-Hazard." A survey link is also on the plan page. Thank you! Figure A2.4:Vaccination Clinic Flyer,2021 County Fair Displays The Dakota County Fair was held in the second week of August 2021, after a one-year hiatus due to the pandemic. Visitors to the County Law Enforcement display area were asked to indicate which preparedness measures their household had taken.Among 30 or more participants, more than half had acquired smoke detectors,first aid kits, fire extinguishers, and first aid or CPR training. My household Preparedness Measure 1 4.34.. r has done this 2021 All-Hazard Mitigation Man Smoke detectors,each floor, 29 new batteries annually Which P(mim pace..ear•ring no preparedness lTr ares you hum flat First Aid Kit, in home and car 22 ,nre ss linexure My hdeelwe hn Sena thin • ••. • •Fire Extinguisher 22 Smoke an g .a • • • First Aid/CPR Training 22 Frail KM in torn Car ••.,•.•• . '•••• Frail Pied Hazard Insurance 11 Flee Extinguisher • myIart. I:''. • •Essential Supply Kit 11 screed upFa yeeeee¢911 • NOAA WMrw Mae I••••'.a . • Signed up for reverse 911 10 — — iHreardInsurance '• •• . • NOAA Weather Radio 10 rielan `"OeC"s""1e •' ' .•• . . . Household Emergency Plan 10 F„''"a"`eT".i.'"' ••'"•••AI, • Fnler9awr PIaR •:• • Attended preparedness 7 I�niw+yra..r .,...ors .. . • • , meetings or events Y• 'p"r'�r" • rota, • . Entering Surely In lay t..•• - "Go Kit"for evacuation 5 l..<..gm e . - ...�• Figure A2.5:County Fair Intercept,2021 Page 286 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 APPENDIX III - 2021 PROGRESS ON 2016 PLAN STRATEGIES Dakota County PUBLIC COMMUNICATION AND EDUCATION Status 2021 Goal 1: Increase awareness of hazard mitigation and preparedness 4. Continue to provide comprehensive public information on disaster mitigation and preparedness, using the County website and/or social media as primary resources for clear information on: • How to get immediate help • How to do home emergency planning(e.g.,evaluation routes,family communication) • How to make a home emergency kit Ongoing • How to stay informed during emergencies • Learning CPR • Hazard-specific information for the public(e.g.,tornadoes,storms,diseases) • County emergency planning 5. Develop an annual seasonal outreach campaign on topics such as severe weather awareness (April)and winter weather preparedness(November)to reach residents directly through targeted Ongoing mailings,articles in the Dakota County Newsletter,and news releases. 6. Routinely include questions on household emergency preparedness in scientific residential Ongoing surveys,to estimate the level of preparedness in Dakota County over time. Goal 2: Continue to communicate and coordinate with other agencies on hazard mitigation and Status 2021 preparedness 1. Continue to regularly meet with city law enforcement,fire departments,emergency managers, public health,hospitals,and emergency medical services as the Domestic Preparedness Ongoing Committee(DPC). 2. Annually review status of City and County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan strategies with the DPC.** Ongoing VIOLENT STORMS/EXTREME TEMPERATURES Goal 1:Ensure safe and accessible shelter from violent storms Status 2021 1. Develop a safe shelter plan for County-owned facilities including shelters,shelter capacity,and exit Ongoing routes. 2. Work with City Emergency Managers and the Red Cross to assure that shelter locations distributed across the County are evaluated by or for the Red Cross as approved shelters with agreements in Ongoing place. 3. Construct storm shelter safe rooms at manufactured home parks/communities,County Ongoing campgrounds,and publicly owned athletic fields or golf courses. VIOLENT STORMS/EXTREME TEMPERATURES Goal 2: Improve severe storm warning system for all residents Status 2021 1. Evaluate the County's outdoor warning system activation policy and procedures with local emergency managers on a periodic basis and communicate any changes with the Dakota Ongoing Communications Center(DCC). 2. Coordinate with DCC and local emergency managers to implement(PAWS emergency notifications Ongoing from the DCC. 3. Develop a communications plan to notify vulnerable populations to take steps to protect Ongoing themselves. 4. Continue participation with ARES group for severe storm spotters and communications network Ongoing volunteers. 5. Continue participation in the Metropolitan Emergency Managers Association's(MEMA)efforts to Delete strategy improve the community notification process and consistency across the Twin Cities area. VIOLENT STORMS/EXTREME TEMPERATURES Goal 3: Protect People and Public Infrastructure Status 2021 1. Continue communications with public safety officials,county/city/township transportation departments,and MN Department of Transportation to limit travel on major transportation routes Ongoing during hazardous driving conditions. 2. Continue to review and improve methods to notify Dakota County staff and facilities to provide adequate warning for severe weather emergencies in the field and the office environment. Ongoing Update as needed. Page 287 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 3. Evaluate installation of lightning indicator and alert systems for outdoor public venues,such as the Ongoing Dakota County Fairgrounds or Dakota County Park System. 4. Complete storm debris management guidelines. Ongoing 5. Proactively manage stormwater infrastructure(e.g.,maintaining drainage ditches,replacing culverts). Conduct hydrological assessments based on NOAA Atlas 14 Precipitation Frequency Ongoing estimates to determine appropriate capacity.* 6. Reconstruct roads that have become vulnerable to repetitive flooding and washouts.* Ongoing 7. Maintain river flow by clearing debris from under bridges during storm-flooding events.* Ongoing 8. Install power back-up systems to maintain operation of traffic signals at high-volume intersections Not complete during outages. FLOOD Goal 1: Address 100-year Flood Risk in all county jurisdictions through land use planning and Status 2021 management. 1. Review current floodplain zoning ordinances for noncompliance with state and federal regulations Ongoing with respect to nonconforming structures. 2. Encourage city and county participation in FEMA Community Rating System program. Townships Ongoing coordinate with County Floodplain Manager on floodplain permit review. FLOOD Goal 2: Pursue Acquisition of Repetitive Loss Structures Status 2021 1. Coordinate with MN HSEM and MN DNR Flood Damage Reduction Program to secure funding to Ongoing acquire repetitive loss structures from willing sellers.* DROUGHT Goal 1: Continue to work toward adequate Wellhead Protection in Dakota County Status 2021 1. Encourage and assist municipal well owners in developing wellhead protection plans. Ongoing DROUGHT Goal 2: Monitor Ground Water Quantity,Supply,Demand Status 2021 1. Review existing groundwater monitoring and modeling programs and determine any needs for Ongoing additional groundwater monitoring. 2. Continue to participate in the Metropolitan Area Water Supply Advisory Committee,Southwest Ongoing Groundwater Work Group,and Southeast Groundwater Work Group. WILDFIRE Goal 1: Reduce Wildfire Risk Status 2021 1. Annually evaluate prescribed burning on all county lands and parks with Minnesota DNR and local Ongoing jurisdictions. 2. Provide an education program for property owners in identified risk areas on practices for Ongoing,as reducing or minimizing wildfire risk.* needed INFECTIOUS DISEASE Goal 1: Effective/Coordinated Prevention and Control Status 2021 1. Work with state and federal agencies to identify infectious diseases with potential to affect the Ongoing county and region. 2. Utilize state and federal and local resources to prevent and control infectious diseases in the Ongoing county. 3. Work with the Minnesota Department of Health(MDH)to develop training programs for private Ongoing health care providers and public health staff in infectious disease monitoring and response. 4. Provide information on the recognition,testing,treating,and reporting of infectious diseases to Ongoing healthcare providers in clinics,hospitals,and other healthcare settings. 5. Work with clinics and hospitals to improve infectious disease reporting. Ongoing 6. Maintain an up-to-date Health Alert Network(HAN)system to keep clinics,hospitals,other health care providers, public safety agencies,schools,local governments,and others informed of urgent Ongoing health/infectious disease events. 7. On an annual basis,review and update the public health emergency response operations plan that Ongoing outlines procedures for dealing with infectious diseases. 8. Continue to work with local hospitals and clinics in developing plans and roles in infectious disease Ongoing response,including quarantine. 9. Continue to work with the MDH in surveillance of infectious diseases in the county. For diseases that may transfer from livestock to humans,continue to work with the State Departments of Ongoing Health and Agriculture,the University of MN Veterinary College,and Agricultural Extension. Page 288 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 10. Work closely with MDH,CDC,and regional public health partners to plan the receipt and Ongoing dispensing of the Strategic National Stockpile. 11. Continue to develop a human quarantine plan collaborating with state,regional,and local partners Ongoing including emergency managers. 12. Work closely with the MDH and regional public health partners to refine the region's all-hazard Ongoing response plan. INFECTIOUS DISEASE Goal 2: Provide Public Information on Infectious Disease Threats Status 2021 1. Work with the Minnesota Public Health Department(MDH)to develop fact sheets,media releases, Ongoing and educational programs for the public. 2. Continue to work with local media to disseminate information about infectious diseases,risk Ongoing potential,and prevention through education articles and news releases. 3. Maintain up-to-date website information and/or links to other sources of reliable information Ongoing about infectious diseases and prevention. PANDEMIC INFLUENZA Goal 1: Maintain public health influenza response preparedness. Status 2021 1. Develop and exercise Public Health pandemic flu preparedness plans. Ongoing LANDSLIDE Goal 1: Reduce vulnerability of infrastructure to landsides in Dakota County.* Status 2021 1. Address vulnerabilities in the County Road System related to saturated soil conditions that can cause landslides or retaining wall failures. Maintain an inventory of retaining walls and prioritize Ongoing replacements.* 2. Address vulnerabilities in the County Trail System related to saturated soil conditions that can cause landslides. Identify and maintain an inventory of high hazard areas to mitigate the potential Ongoing for erosion and landslides.* STRUCTURAL FIRE Goal 1: Protect structures from fire Status 2021 1. Evaluate ordinances requiring prompt removal of snow around commercial and industrial buildings Ongoing in order to ensure access for fire and other emergency equipment with cities and townships.* 2. Work with cities and townships to identify roadways of insufficient width to handle fire trucks and Ongoing establish priorities and approaches for addressing deficiencies.* STRUCTURAL FIRE Goal 2: Public Education Status 2021 1. Work through Dakota County Fire Chiefs Association and participating cities to provide public education to a)youth,focusing on stoves,smoke detectors,fire safety,and evacuation;and b) Ongoing homeowners,focusing on chimney inspections,electrical systems,flammable materials, heating systems,household chemicals,and evacuation.* HAZMAT Goal 1: Work to ensure that emergency personnel and other potentially affected parties Status 2021 are informed about hazardous materials/waste located in and transported through Dakota County. 1. Work with township,city,state,and federal agencies and private industries to share information on types and locations of hazardous wastes and contaminated sites that have the potential to Ongoing affect the county and region. 2. Support the use of the Recycling Zone to minimize the quantities of household hazardous materials/waste in the community and encourage cities to promote household hazardous waste Ongoing collection. 3. Provide training/education for hazardous waste generators on proper storage/disposal of Ongoing hazardous waste. 4. Continue to develop new capabilities to predict the direction and velocity of groundwater flow and surface water runoff;integrate these results in the County GIS system;and share results with Ongoing appropriate users. 5. Conduct hazardous waste compliance inspections to ensure proper management,storage,and Ongoing training at hazardous waste generator locations. HAZMAT Goal 2: Improve the effectiveness of policies and planning efforts addressing hazardous Status 2021 materials/waste. 1. Review and update the County policies and environmental plans that address hazardous Ongoing material/waste storage and transportation in Dakota County. 2. Develop and distribute debris management guidelines. Ongoing 3. Coordinate and facilitate discussion between the cities and the County on policies related to Ongoing hazardous materials/waste storage and transportation. Page 289 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 4. Design and implement hazardous material scenarios for practice exercise and to create community Ongoing awareness.(consistent with National Planning Scenarios). 5. Encourage training to at least the Hazardous Materials Awareness and Weapons of Mass Destruction(CBRNE)level training for the ten Office of Domestic Preparedness disciplines(law Ongoing enforcement,fire,EMS,dispatch,public health,health care,emergency management,public works,administration,and hazmat). 6. Continue to expand use of mutual aid agreements and memoranda of understanding to improve Ongoing response coordination between local,state,and federal agencies and appropriate private sectors. 7. Conduct evacuation planning for townships and County facilities for hazardous material incidents. Periodic 8. Evaluate how to improve safety of rail intersections with major highways,through deeper/wider Periodic intersections or grade separated crossings. DAM FAILURE Goal 1: Maintain continued structural integrity of dams and bridges. Status 2021 1. Continue implementation of Federal Energy Regulatory Commission(FERC)dam safety Ongoing requirements at the County-owned Byllesby Dam. 2. Regularly inspect and maintain bridges and update the bridge replacement list to ensure that Ongoing potential deficiencies are addressed. DAM FAILURE Goal 2: Protect residents'safety downstream of Lake Byllesby Dam. Status 2021 1. Continue to coordinate with Dakota County Environmental Resources,Goodhue County,Cannon Falls,and other emergency providers to exercise the Lake Byllesby Dam Emergency Action Plan Ongoing (EAP)as required by FERC.* 2. Continue to monitor reservoir elevations and effectively communicate conditions to downstream Ongoing interests as warranted. 3. Enforce the Byllesby Dam security plan elements and public safety rules,per FERC requirements.* Ongoing WATER SUPPLY CONTAMINATION Goal 1: Protect the Quality of the County's Groundwater Status 2016 1. Continue to regulate well construction and sealing through a permitting process that includes inspections in accordance with Dakota County Ordinance No. 114 and Minnesota Rules Chapter Ongoing 4725. 2. Continue providing a well-testing service for private well owners. Ongoing 3. Continue to review well disclosure documents for the purpose of sealing wells at property sale. Ongoing 4. Continue to administer a well seal-cost share grant with the assistance of the Dakota County Community Development Agency(CDA)and continue to administer our Well Seal-Cost Share Grant Ongoing Program. 5. Continue to enforce private well water quality standards at the time of property sale. Ongoing 6. Continue to enforce septic system construction standards at the time of property sale or bedroom Ongoing addition in areas where the County has jurisdictional authority. 7. Continue to administer a septic system maintenance program that requires that every system is Ongoing pumped or inspected every three years. 8. Explore ways to reduce impacts of non-point source contaminants on groundwater and surface water through outreach on adoption of agricultural Best Management Practices(BMPs)and Ongoing availability of financial support. 9. Explore ways to reduce impacts of non-point source contaminants on groundwater and surface Ongoing waters through targeted monitoring for nitrates,pesticides,and herbicides. 10. Educate floodplain well owners about protecting drinking water wells from flooding. Ongoing WATER SUPPLY CONTAMINATION Goal 2: Protect Residents from Contaminated Ground Water Status 2021 1. Identify sources for obtaining bottled water,including bottled water distributors and local grocery Ongoing stores for unincorporated areas of the county. 2. Facilitate well testing and disinfection in case of contamination. Ongoing 3. Assist cities and the State Health Department in public notification and coordination in the event Ongoing of a municipal well contamination incident. 4. Provide well disinfection brochures to impacted well owners. Ongoing Page 290 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 5. Provide education materials on monitoring private wells. Ongoing WATER SUPPLY CONTAMINATION Goal 3: Protect Drinking Water Supplies Status 2021 1. Maintain and review copies of Wellhead Protection Plans and GIS coverages of the Wellhead Protection Areas(WHPAs)and Drinking Water Supply Management Areas(DWSMAs)as they are Ongoing developed by Public Water Supply Well owners and submitted to the Minnesota Department of Health. 2. Encourage and assist communities in developing groundwater protection plans. Ongoing 3. Encourage cities to enhance security of their wells,reservoirs,and treatment facilities.* Ongoing TERRORISM Goal 1: Reduce Risk to Public Facilities and Infrastructure Status 2021 1. Enhance public employee training on facility security awareness and incident reporting via"See Ongoing Something—Say Something"Campaign. 2. Review recommendations made in FEMA 426 Reference Manual to Mitigate Potential Terrorist Attacks Against Buildings for possible incorporation into County building design standards.Share Ongoing applicable information with cities.* 3. Continue to explore different methods to share public building specifications and plans with police Ongoing and fire. 4. Continue countywide exercise program to include threats presented by terrorism(e.g.,active Ongoing shooter,bomb threats,anthrax). TERRORISM Goal 2: Assure an effective and coordinated public health response to prevent and Status 2021 control injury,disease,and death as a result of bioterrorism. Objectives and strategies under this goal are the same as goals and objectives listed under the hazard "Infectious Diseases." The County Public Health Department is developing its infectious disease Ongoing strategies under the philosophy that these strategies will be equally important whether an infectious disease occurs naturally or a bioterrorist event occurs. CYBER-ATTACK Goal 1: Reduce Cyber Security Risk to County Network Infrastructure and Software Status 2021 Applications. 7. Communicate with cities regarding strategies for infrastructure protection and cyber-security. Ongoing Cities in Dakota County City of Apple Valley Status 2021 1. Provide NIMS and Hazmat training to all police department employees Ongoing 2. Complete and update emergency medication dispensing planning for City of Apple Complete,compare to COOP Valley 3. Identify emerging and local terrorism risks/concerns through regular involvement with the FBI Joint Terrorism Executive Task Force Executive Board Ongoing 4. Install sprinkling system into the Hayes Community Center building* Complete,strategy deleted 5. Continue 2020 Flood Mitigation:Galaxie Ave.and Garden View Dr.** Strategy expanded,ongoing 6. Continue annual infrastructure inspection/maintenance program Ongoing 7. Update and implement the City of Apple Valley Emergency Operations Plan(EOP) Ongoing 8. Regularly train with Apple Valley Fire Dept.relating to coordinated response(3 Ongoing,strategy modified Echo)including hands on scenario-based training City of Burnsville Status 2021 1. Enhance Information Technology/Fiber Optic Security Completed in 2018,ongoing updates 2. Replace aging sewer lines* Ongoing 3. Establish a process to increase monitoring-patrol of identified MANPADS sites Ongoing 4. Continue Emergency Siren Maintenance Plan Ongoing 5. Maintain Active List of All 302 Facilities Ongoing 6. Conduct EOC Drill Annually Ongoing Page 291 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 7. Continue NIMS Training for City Staff Ongoing 8. Complete Sunset Dam EAP Update Complete,passed annual inspection 9. Continue Fire Prevention Programs Ongoing City of Coates Status 2021 1. Maintain warning sirens* 2. Grade roads to repair damage from flash floods* City of Eagan Status 2021 1. Complete implementation of the"Top Ten"items to address as identified from the preliminary security assessment. Ongoing 2. Install an emergency generator at South Water Treatment Plant. Completed 3. Continue storm water pond expansion and maintenance. Ongoing 4. Adopt the 2015 Minnesota Fire Code.* Ongoing,as State Code is updated 5. Conduct Internal and/or External Network Information Security Assessments and Penetration Tests. Ongoing 6. Update Building Code. Ongoing,as State Code is updated 7. Conduct special event and emergency planning activities with the local NFL Ongoing,strategy modified franchise that will be moving headquarters and training facilities into the City. 8. Train staff from multiple departments in the proper reporting and response to Ongoing for new staff illicit discharges to storm sewers and surface waters. 9. Research lightning detection equipment/services for city venues,particularly for the water park.** Ongoing 10. Research sheltering options for large outdoor gatherings(festival grounds,athletic complexes).** Ongoing City of Farmington Status 2021 1. Identify 302 Facilities, Debris Management and Staging Plans.** Ongoing 2. Continue Water Tower Inspection* Ongoing 3. Replace water and sewer lines identified as insufficient* Ongoing 4. Wellhead Protection Maintenance* Ongoing 5. Fire Truck Replacement or Refurbishment* Ongoing 6. Police Car Replacement* Ongoing 7. Continue NIMS training Ongoing 8. Examine solutions for Vermillion River Flooding Ongoing City of Hampton Status 2021 1. Replace clay sewer lines. Nearly complete 2. Erect new water tower.* Ongoing 3. Continue to document City critical infrastructure in GIS. Ongoing 4. Continue to participate in NIMS training. Ongoing City of Hastings Status 2021 1. Update Emergency Operations Plan(EOP) Ongoing 2. Replace water/sewer/storm sewer lines(new and existing)* Ongoing 3. Continue wellhead protection Ongoing 4. Continue stormwater management(replacing undersized storm sewers and improving water quality)* Ongoing 5. Continue with drainage and erosion control plans Ongoing 6. Continue to enforce zoning and permits regulations in floodplains** Ongoing 7. Monitor construction,improvements,alterations,and development in floodplains Ongoing 8. Ensure Building Code compliance* Ongoing Page 292 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 9. Continue to enforce mixed occupancy fire alarm ordinance Ongoing 10. Continue to enforce burning bans Ongoing 11. Conduct Emergency Operations Center Drills Ongoing 12. Educate and train staff on Illicit Discharge Detection Elimination(IDDE)to eliminate discharge to storm sewers Ongoing 13. Evaluate need for additional storm sirens related to community growth Ongoing 14. Conduct water main leak detection survey Ongoing City of Inver Grove Heights Status 2021 1. Address wellhead protection needs. Ongoing 2. Complete water supply planning. Delete strategy 3. Conduct maintenance on water storage facilities. Ongoing 4. Inspect Wells. Ongoing 5. Sanitary Sewer Lining for Infiltration and Inflow Management. Ongoing 6. Lift Station Maintenance. Ongoing 7. Risk Management for Water Treatment Plant. Ongoing 8. Storm Water Management/MS4/Maintenance. Ongoing 9. Mississippi River Dike Opening Management/Flood Mitigation. Ongoing 10. Mass Dispensing Compliance. Ongoing 11. Outdoor Warning Siren Maintenance. Ongoing 12. Debris Management. Ongoing 13. Rail/Pipeline Safety. Ongoing 14. Build storm shelter/safe rooms at manufactured home parks. Delete Strategy City of Lakeville Status 2021 1. Develop the Citywide Street Reconstruction Plan.* Ongoing 2. Conduct Three Echo/Active/Hostile Event Trainings.** Ongoing 3. Exercise and drill EOC and supervisory staff on storm or transportation accident. Ongoing 4. Storm watershed maintenance. Ongoing 5. Shelter planning with local partners. 6. Evaluate ordinances requiring prompt removal of snow around commercial and industrial buildings in order to insure access for fire and other emergency Ongoing equipment with cities and townships.* 7. Provide school programs to youth,focusing on stoves,smoke detectors,fire safety,and evacuation. Ongoing 8. Work through Dakota County Fire Chiefs Association,including participant cities, to provide public education to homeowners,focusing on chimney inspections, electrical systems,flammable materials,heating systems,household chemicals, Ongoing and evacuation. 9. Storm Siren Maintenance. Ongoing 10. Work towards a shared services system with Eureka Township. TBD City of Lilydale Status 2021 1. Implement and maintain Stormwater Management Plan.* Complete,ongoing implementation 2. Promote recycling of household hazardous waste at the County Recycling Zone. Complete,Ongoing 3. Educate the public on enrolling in reverse 911 services. Complete,Ongoing 4. Evaluate cyber vulnerabilities of city resources. Ongoing 5. Implement storm sewer management project to increase capacity and direct flow. Drop shaft project complete,ongoing Page 293 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 City of Mendota Status 2021 1. Complete de-slope project.* ** 2. Enforce-maintain stormwater management ordinances. 3. Continue sanitary sewer management. 4. Continue stormwater pond maintenance. City of Mendota Heights Status 2021 1. Remodel/build Fire and Police Department spaces to develop a useable Fire Station complete,Police-City Hall Emergency Operations Center.* in progress 2. Conduct GENSET Emergency Generator Test.* Complete,generator upgraded 3. Enhance computer security and data recovery.* Complete 4. Conduct a comprehensive review of All Hazard Mitigation Plan every five years.** Ongoing 5. Monitor MANPADS sites.* Ongoing 6. Line sanitary sewers for infiltration and inflow management. Ongoing 7. Continue NIMS training for EOP staff. Ongoing 8. Replace outdoor warning sirens. Ongoing 9. Clean and expand storm water ponds. Ongoing 10. Create a shared database of§302 facilities. TBD 11. Expand wildfire education and mitigation. Ongoing 12. Provide landslide prevention and education. Ongoing 13. Provide public education on reverse 911 service registration. Ongoing 14. Provide Knowledge Center training for all staff. Complete,delete strategy City of Miesville Status 2021 1. Maintain city warning sirens.* Ongoing 2. Stormwater management and coulee maintenance Ongoing 3. Conduct hazmat training Ongoing 4. Participate in full-scale exercise with County** Ongoing,as available City of New Trier Status 2021 1. Install backup power at water tower. Ongoing 2. Update Building Ordinance. Ongoing 3. Complete parking upgrades. Ongoing City of Randolph Status 2021 1. Water Tower Inspection.* Reconditioning completed 2020 2. Anhydrous Ammonia Training. Ongoing 3. Building Code Updates.* Periodic,ongoing 4. New Sirens.* Ongoing 5. Additional Water Tower. Ongoing City of Rosemount Status 2021 1. Maintain a rental property license and inspection program. Ongoing 2. Emergency siren replacement and updates. Ongoing 3. Fire truck replacement or refurbishment. Ongoing 4. Police car replacement. Ongoing 5. Increase water storage and redundancy.* Ongoing 6. Implement North Central Sanitary Sewer Plan.** Ongoing 7. Code review and revision. Ongoing Page 294 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 City of South St. Paul Status 2021 1. Develop debris management plan/strategies.** Complete 2. Complete annual inspections on all high-risk properties and biennial inspections on all other businesses.* Ongoing 3. Assess and upgrade city outdoor weather sirens-narrow banding. Increase public awareness related to outdoor sirens. Ongoing 4. Continue updates of the City of South St. Paul Emergency Operations Plan. Ongoing 5. Re-certification of the levee with FEMA and revamping of the entire operation, Complete,strategy deleted maintenance,and preparation manual for the levee and floods. 6. Updates to firewalls with advanced intrusion detection/prevention capabilities. Ongoing 7. Evaluate$15 Million upgrade to Concord Street. Project underway,complete in 2022 City of Sunfish Lake Status 2021 1. Stormwater Ponding Expansion and Maintenance Ongoing 2. Culvert/Drainage Improvements Ongoing 3. Obtain Drainage Easements Ongoing 4. Enforcement of Burning Permits Ongoing 5. Well Management Ongoing 6. Subsurface Sewage treatment System Maintenance Ongoing City of Vermillion Status 2021 1. Maintain road grading. Ongoing 2. Maintain outdoor warning sirens. Ongoing 3. Maintain outdoor burning restrictions.* Ongoing 4. Outfit well with generator outlet. Ongoing 5. Continue water tower inspection. Ongoing City of West St. Paul Status 2021 1. Mutual aid interagency agreements. Ongoing 2. Continuity of Operations Planning. Updated 2019 3. Site Emergency Plans(pre-planning). Ongoing 4. Stormwater Pond Expansion and Maintenance. Ongoing 5. Inflow and Infiltration Repair and replacement of infrastructure. Ongoing 6. Familiarization and Maintenance of Personal Protection Equipment(PPE). Ongoing 7. Mission Critical and Vulnerability Assessment. Ongoing 8. General maintenance and backup systems for lift stations. Ongoing 9. Provide public education and awareness for emergencies. Ongoing 10. Continue to use and enforce Land Use Planning for hazard avoidance. Ongoing 11. Education the public on family disaster plans and supply kits. Ongoing 12. Burning restriction enforcement. Ongoing 13. Fireworks regulation enforcement. Ongoing 14. Waste disposal regulation enforcement. Ongoing 15. Establish a process to increase monitoring of identified MANPADS sites. Ongoing 16. Driver safety education for winter storms. Ongoing 17. Develop a common operating resource database through local deployment of the Knowledge Center System. Ongoing 18. Enforce City Ordinance restricting open grills on apartment balconies. Ongoing 19. Annual outdoor siren maintenance program. Ongoing 20. Emergency Response Personnel,Specialized Abilities and Training(SOT). Ongoing Page 295 DRAFT Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2022 21. Inspect business and multifamily occupancies. Ongoing 22. Provide NOAA weather radios. Delete strategy 23. Building construction and code enforcement. Ongoing 24. Robert Street Redevelopment(including safety improvements). Complete 25. Adopt IPMC code(simpler,increased compliance).* Complete 2018,ongoing updates 26. Conduct rental inspections.* Ongoing 27. Evaluate and reduce cyber threat potential.* TBD Page 296 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY RESOLUTION 2022- A RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE DAKOTA COUNTY ALL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN WHEREAS, the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 requires counties and cities to prepare an All-Hazard Mitigation Plan (Plan) every five years; and WHEREAS,plans must address potential natural and manmade hazard and develop mitigation strategies to reduce the impacts of hazard events both in dollars and lives saved; and WHEREAS, the County and participating cities must have an adopted Plan to be eligible for federal disaster relief and mitigation project grants; and WHEREAS, the first Plan was approved by the Minnesota Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management(MNHSEM) and the Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA) in 2006 and the was updated again in 2011 and 2017; and WHEREAS, since late 2020, the City of Apple Valley has participated in updating the City's mitigations strategies as part of the required five-year update to the Plan, and WHEREAS, the Act as part of the planning process requires public involvement and local coordination among neighboring local units of government and businesses; and WHEREAS, the Plan includes a risk assessment including past hazards, hazards that threaten the county, an estimate of structures at risk, a general description of land uses and development trends; and WHEREAS, the Plan includes a mitigation strategy including goals and objectives and an action plan identifying specific mitigation projects and costs; and WHEREAS, the Plan includes a maintenance or implementation process including plan updates, integration of the plan into other planning documents and how Plan participants will maintain public participation and coordination; and WHEREAS, the Plan has been shared with the Minnesota Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management and the Federal Emergency Management Agency for review and comments and received conditional approval on August 4, 2022; and WHEREAS, The Dakota County Board of Commissioners formally approved and adopted the 2022 update to the All-Hazard Mitigation Plan in late September 2022. WHEREAS, the plan, in its entirety, was provided to the City Council as part of the December 8, 2022, agenda packet. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Apple Valley supports the hazard mitigation planning effort and wishes to adopt the 2022 update to the Dakota County All-Hazard Mitigation Plan. ADOPTED this 8th day of December, 2022. Clint Hooppaw, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk • ITEM: 4.J. ..... Appleil COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 8, 2022 Valley SECTION: Consent Agenda Description: Adopt Resolution Decertifying Tax Increment Financing District No. 14 Staff Contact: Department/ Division: Ron Hedberg, Finance Director Finance Department ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the resolution decertifying Tax Increment Financing District No. 14. SUMMARY: The existing Tax Increment District (TIF) Number 14 - Apple Valley Business Campus has come to the end of its eligible life and should be decertified. Following decertification staff will file the required reporting with both the County Auditor and State Auditor. This TIF district is an economic development district, was created in 2012 and includes the areas north of 157th street on Felton Avenue, see the attached map for the parcels included. BACKGROUND: The City has worked with the County Auditor on determining the required decertification date for TIF 14. This economic development district was originally approved on March 22, 2012, and has reached the end of its life. Following decertification the City will no longer receive Tax Increments, but the balances may continue to be spent for eligible tax increment expenditures, for this type of district it would be limited to manufacturing or distribution uses. TIF 14 is scheduled to be decertified by Dakota County at the end of 2022. Following the final 2022 estimated collection and subsequent payment to the property owner, TIF 14 would have a projected balance of approximately $125,000. If eligible uses are not identified the balances would be returned to the County for re-distribution to the City, School District and County, of which Apple Valley would receive approximately 1/3 of the balance in the re- distribution. BUDGET IMPACT: The decertification of TIF 14 will return approximately $265,000 of tax capacity value back to the tax rolls, this will generate approximately $92,000 of levy capacity beginning in 2023. This increase in levy capacity has been factored in the 2023 budget. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit Resolution Apple Valley Tax Increment Districts 11/29/2022 _ Property Information Search (au.:k sIIrVeY T ■ ' ■i■■i■■11.LIUMMII I. .11.11111.11M Se it ` :,,,.,., . ,I -11: q rhlSpari 41 Apple Valley ill ��^... . apprrwaar apple valley Awe.Ce alley TIF 17 (uhnn.n�Nr • �ti nosiness sear a �.[).-Q11r-In r .:. F d Ly t.,.,p�s r AWN Vie* ma. .ae.l�an w *i.e..'11�y'c +1++5��3 /i'+ 47� €hb[81.[e IHtilA MAl •A . 11 f 3 TIF14rSIa'a ira �k'e.! fhlI.rnI o-T • ,.,,________--- ---LE w !-.,p Apple vaury Apple valley. . Fppre Vdlry - e3 �,nusinesl Camp a frf Urtfpus Hoy - 47eh Si ausi ao ♦ . il: wAtor v upenpr n Ckrs9ae .F V 1.1111 1;711e 5Hee1 West ,{pA+� TIF 16 Vkller 1. - Menard-s > eanPG Av.., Ve P. itluuLdh Ourode � • F1�IF0 sam's Clete rrkl4rns*VA + IL Z PpeMrK !Peer Va1Wj Pep*Her Men.rd's ! 10 Churpe _.. I \i " — 51.Irre SdeoW I'ar y f7ri M[Cermlkk uloP*kkurkrltril vE'L!a €ornput.r firm,. Mammy ams POI. i+qs sso 1b6 Renal. Fokd.earflllla • nun4w.;enn Pipeline �71^ .11c. r—� ^-- — '42. "-r. - - I I.chwl j - r El .nyzime m. ■ Patent Sro i e A lecar7-Mohile i¢neteiablle'. Great RPM Eaargy _ w� tee eaa Fes•�r sr P. .rS *n-r AWE.' u'.G., !PIS ter w 15:se Su .-er Ah6e)f a4r1y�C .Iiiii CaChka 1 t•crne Do. TIF 15 .le1l lie liii flea., Fiu •v1ap A99`�le r,er 1 >arA gg rrtyace _ r rd?e'.o- - y ry n k C.C We, 30C 6GOhr e ` e• 4Ia Cc.()Al 12 3.F �.y:a liz... i 1 Esr.,NASA,NG A,USG'S FEMA I Esn Cornmu'ny Meps Contr:6ator.,County o{Qekatq Ik CITY OF APPLE VALLEY RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION DECERTIFYING TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT NUMBER 14 WHEREAS, the City of Apple Valley approved the economic development Tax Increment District No. 14 Apple Valley Business Campus on March 22, 2012, and WHEREAS, economic development Tax Increment Districts have a maximum time frame they may be in existence, and WHEREAS, the Dakota County Auditor has worked with the City of Apple Valley in determination of the required decertification date, and WHEREAS, the decertification date has been determined to be December 31, 2022. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Apple Valley,Dakota County,Minnesota,that Tax Increment Financing District Number 14 be decertified effective December 31, 2022. ADOPTED this 8th day of December 8,2022. Clint Hooppaw,Mayor ATTEST: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk • ITEM: 4.K. ..... :�. Appleil COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 8, 2022 Valley SECTION: Consent Agenda Description: Approve Reduction of Natural Resources Management Permit Financial Guarantees Staff Contact: Department/ Division: Taylor Stockert, Natural Resources Technician Natural Resources Division ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the reduction of the Natural Resources Management Permit financial guarantees for Redstone Design, LLC, for construction of a single family home and for Doran Construction Company, LLC, for construction of a senior housing complex addition. SUMMARY: The following projects have been inspected and are partially compliant according to City requirements: 1. 12121 Galaxie Avenue Permit No. AV096164 Amount $9,900.00 Reduce now to $2,000.00 Guarantee Type: Check 2. Orchard Path Phase Two Permit No. AV095273 Amount $22,500.00 Reduce now to $4,800.00 Guarantee Type: Check BACKGROUND: The City retains Natural Resources Management Permit (NRMP) financial securities to ensure the protection of natural resources during land disturbing activities. BUDGET IMPACT: N/A • ITEM: 4.L. ..... :�. Apple COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 8, 2022 Valley SECTION: Consent Agenda Description: Approve Reduction of Various Financial Guarantees Staff Contact: Department/ Division: Breanna Vincent, Department Assistant Community Development Department ACTION REQUESTED: Approve reduction of various financial guarantees. SUMMARY: The City holds numerous financial guarantees to ensure the installation of certain improvements in new developments, as well as to assure protection of natural resources. Staff review of the status of these developments indicates that the following action is in order: 1. Applewood Pointe LOC No. 00000942 (PC22-09-SV) Original Deposit on 4/21/2022 for $2,612,213.00 Reduce now to $1,282,388.00 2. Apple Ford Lincoln LOC No. IS000310423U (PC21-35-BG) Original Deposit on 8/24/2022 for $347,500.00 Reduce now to $165,145.00 Lakeside of Diamond Path LOC No. 1440721967-01 3. (PC21-34-SVF) Original Deposit on 7/14/2022 for $262,500.00 Reduce now to $202,500.00 4. Apple Valley Industrial - Opus Check No. 14879 Development Original Deposit on 9/15/2022 (PC21-30-B) for $438,411.00 Reduce now to $338,411.00 BACKGROUND: N/A BUDGET IMPACT: N/A • ITEM: 4.M. ..... Appleil COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 8, 2022 Valley SECTION: Consent Agenda Description: Apple Valley Fire Station#2 & Improvements to #1 &#3 Staff Contact: Department/ Division: Charles Grawe,Assistant City Administrator Administration/ Information Technologies ACTION REQUESTED: 1. Adopt the resolution awarding contracts for Apple Valley Fire Station #2 & Improvements to #1 & #3 to various contractors in various amounts. 2. Adopt the resolution rejecting bids for Bid Category 3B Precast Concrete. SUMMARY: The Apple Valley Fire Station #2 & Improvements to #1 & #3 project is using construction management services. As a result, the bid specification created 29 separate bid categories. Attached for consideration is a resolution awarding contracts for 28 of the bid categories. Also attached is a resolution rejecting bids in one of the bid categories. The project involves the demolition and reconstruction of Fire Station 2 and several health safety improvements at Stations 1 and 3. The City is seeking to improve firefighter safety and create a more flexible operation that will better serve current and future department operations. BACKGROUND: Firefighter safety precautions to better protect firefighters from hazardous smoke-derived contaminates is a key goal being addressed at all three stations. Regarding Fire Station 2, the station was opened in 1979 and expanded in 2003. After 20 years, it is currently inadequately sized and placed on the site in a manner that is not optimal for further expansion. The existing building footprint met the City's needs for the past half century, but a larger footprint to better meet the department's safety and training needs, and a more flexible design to accommodate different operational models in the future if necessary, will allow the new building to serve the City for the next half century. This project has been anticipated in the Capital Improvements Program (CIP). Staff updated the City Council on the project at several past informal City Council workshop meetings. Staff has been working with architects and engineers for the past year to develop plans and specifications. This project is being done through a construction management firm. This means that the City, with the assistance of the construction management firm, will be acting similar to a general contractor. As a result, the bid specification has 29 bid categories that were each bid separately and will result in 29 individual construction contract awards. In the Bid Category 3B Precast Concrete, both of the received bids were found to be not in compliance with the bidding requirements. As a result, staff recommends rejecting the bids in Category 3B Precast Concrete. The most recent construction document cost estimate for the work covered under these contracts was just under $17.5 million. The total amount of received bids is under this estimated amount. There are approximately $2.5 million in additional "soft costs", such as architectural and engineering fees, commissioning, and furnishings and equipment that are not included in this group of contracts and will be approved at a later point in time. On November 17, 2022, the City received bids on the project. Please see the attachment for the full bid tabulation. Also attached is a memo recommending bid awards that identifies the lowest responsible bidders and corresponding bids for all the bid categories. Staff recommends the City Council adopt the resolution awarding contracts for Apple Valley Fire Station #2 & Improvements to #1 and #3 to the various bidders and corresponding bid amounts as listed in the resolution. The City intends to use the AIA template agreement and contingent upon final review and approval of the agreement by the City Attorney and City Administrator. Staff also recommends the City Council adopt the resolution rejecting bids for Bid Category 3B Precast Concrete. Staff will use means allowed under State statute to solicit new proposals for the Precast Concrete and will bring a contract before the Council in a future meeting. BUDGET IMPACT: This project is funded by 2021 Facilities Capital Improvement Project bonds. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution Resolution Bid / Quote Tabulation Memo CITY OF APPLE VALLEY RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION AWARDING CONTRACTS FOR APPLE VALLEY FIRE STATION#2 & IMPROVEMENTS TO #1 &#3 WHEREAS,pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 2022- , sealed bids were received, opened, and tabulated on November 17, 2022, for Apple Valley Fire Station#2 & Improvements to #1 &#3, and WHEREAS, a tabulation of bids is attached hereto as Exhibit A, and WHEREAS, the Architect and Construction Manager have reviewed the bids received in the various Bid Categories and recommended acceptance of the following bids: Bid Category 3A Building Concrete to Thomsen Construction Services, LLC in the amount of$662,000.00; Bid Category 4A Masonry to T.C.R. Enterprises, Inc., DBA J &K Masonry in the amount of$1,708,000.00; Bid Category 5A Steel (Supply& Install) to Red Cedar Steel Erectors, Inc. in the amount of$1,163,700.00; Bid Category 6A Carpentry to Ebert, Inc. dba Ebert Construction in the amount of 443,000.00; Bid Category 6B Casework to Woodside Industries, Inc. in the amount of$132,714.56; Bid Category 7A Waterproofing &Air Barriers to Swanson & Youngdale, Inc. in the amount of$67,697.00; Bid Category 7B Roofing to Berwald Roofing Company, Inc. in the amount of 516,000.00; Bid Category 7C Wall Panels to Innovative Building Concepts LLC in the amount of $263,500.00; Bid Category 7D Joint Sealants to Right-Way Caulking, Inc. in the amount of $81,500.00; Bid Category 8A Doors & Hardware (Material Only) to Mid Central Door Co. in the amount of$209,087.00; Bid Category 8B Four Fold& Sectional Doors to Crawford Door Sales Company Twin Cities, Inc. in the amount of$656,106.00; Bid Category 8C Glass & Glazing to Structural Glass Products, Inc. in the amount of $345,000.00; Bid Category 9A Gypsum Board to RTL Construction, Inc. in the amount of 339,000.00; Bid Category 9B Tile to WTG Terrazzo &Tile, Inc. in the amount of$75,340.00; Bid Category 9C Acoustical Ceilings to Twin Cities Acoustics, Inc. in the amount of 38,300.00; Bid Category 9D Carpet&Resilient Flooring to Sonus Interiors, Inc. in the amount of 117,700.00; Bid Category 9E Epoxy Flooring to SwedeBro, Inc. in the amount of$84,150.00; Bid Category 9F Painting to Mulcahy Nickolaus, LLC in the amount of$188,100.00; Bid Category 14A Elevator to Schindler Elevator Corporation in the amount of 126,400.00; Bid Category 21A Fire Suppression to Nova Fire Protection, Inc. in the amount of $139,000.00; Bid Category 22A Mechanical to New Line Mechanical Inc. in the amount of $2,480,000.00; Bid Category 26A Electrical to Vinco, Inc. in the amount of$1,470,230.00; Bid Category 31A Building Demo &Earthwork to Park Construction Company in the amount of$740,960.00; Bid Category 32A Fencing to Century Fence Company in the amount of$56,660.00; Bid Category 32B Asphalt to McNamara Contracting, Inc. in the amount of$86,500.00; Bid Category 32C Site Concrete to Stapf Concrete Construction, Inc. in the amount of $571,700.00; Bid Category 32D Landscaping to North Metro Companies, LLC in the amount of $173,679.25; Bid Category 33A Site Utilities to Park Construction Company in the amount of $506,800.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Apple Valley, Dakota County, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The bids listed above are hereby found to be the lowest responsible bids meeting specifications for each listed Bid Category. 2. The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized to enter into contracts with the recommended entities, for corresponding Bid Categories, in the corresponding amounts, in accordance with the bids and specifications heretofore approved by the Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk. 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidders and the next lowest bidders in each Bid Category shall be retained until a contract has been signed for the category. ADOPTED this 8th day of December, 2022. Clint Hooppaw, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk CITY OF APPLE VALLEY RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION REJECTING BIDS FOR APPLE VALLEY FIRE STATION#2 & IMPROVEMENTS TO#1 & #3: BID CATEGORY 3B PRECAST CONCRETE WHEREAS,pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 2022- , sealed bids were received, opened, and tabulated on November 17, 2022, for Apple Valley Fire Station#2 & Improvements to #1 &#3, and WHEREAS, the Architect and Construction Manager have reviewed the bids received in the various categories and found that both bids submitted for Bid Category 3B Precast Concrete were not in compliance with bidding requirements and recommend rejection of bids in this category. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Apple Valley, Dakota County, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The bids received on November 17, 2022, for Apple Valley Fire Station#2 & Improvements to #1 &#3: Bid Category 3B Precast Concrete, are hereby rejected. 2. The Council authorizes staff to solicit new proposals for the goods and services in Bid Category 3B Precast Concrete using means available to the City as identified under State statute. ADOPTED this 8th day of December, 2022. Clint Hooppaw, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk I I Terra BID TABULATION CONSTRUCTION APPLE VALLEY FIRE STATION #2 & IMPROVEMENTS TO #1 & #3 Bid Opening-2:00 PM 11/17/2022 Addendums Acknowledged Bid Security Base Bid Bid Category 3A-Concrete B&D ASSOCIATES 1,2 X $ 797,000.00 THOMSEN CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 1,2 X $ 662,000.00 NORTHLAND CONCRETE&MASONRY COMPANY 1,2 X $ 922,750.00 THOMPSON CONSTRUCTION OF PRINCETON 1,2 X $ 879,779.00 EBERT 1,2 X $ 812,200.00 Bid Category 3B-Precast Concrete MOLIN 1,2 X $ 69,316.00 GAGE BROTHERS X $ 92,200.00 Bid Category 4A-Masonry B&D ASSOCIATES 1,2 X $ 1,894,000.00 TCR ENTERPRISES(dba J&K MASONRY) 1,2 X $ 1,708,000.00 NORTHLAND CONCRETE&MASONRY COMPANY 1,2 X $ 2,022,175.00 Bid Category 5A-Steel(Supply&Install) RED CEDAR STEEL ERECTORS 1,2 X $ 1,163,700.00 PATRIOT ERECTORS 1,2 X $ 1,257,000.00 DANNY'S CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 1,2 X $ 1,345,800.00 SOWLES CO 1,2 X $ 1,285,000.00 Bid Category 6A-Carpentry PARKOS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 1,2 X $ 483,000.00 KELLINGTON CONSTRUCTION 1,2 X $ 455,000.00 EBERT 1,2 X $ 443,000.00 Bid Category 6B-Casework NORTHERN WOODWORKS 1,2 X $ 134,975.00 WOODSIDE INDUSTRIES 1,2 X $ 132,714.56 SOUTHERN MINNESOTA WOODCRAFT 1,2 X $ 218,500.00 RON'S CABINETS 1,2 X $ 152,945.00 Bid Category 7A-Waterproofing&Air Barriers EXTERIOR BUILDING SERVICES 1,2 $ 93,853.00 HENKEMEYER COATINGS 1,2 X S 94,926.00 GREENER WORLD SOLUTIONS 1,2 X $ 112,680.00 NORTHSTAR WEATHERPROOFING&WATERPROOFING 1,2 X $ 91,000.00 SPEC 7 GROUP 1,2 X $ 181,784.00 THE SOPRIS GROUP 1,2 X $ 142,600.00 SWANSON&YOUNGDALE 1,2 X $ 67,697.00 Bid Category 7B-Roofing BERWALD ROOFING&SHEETMETAL 1,2 X $ 516,000.00 CENTRAL ROOFING COMPANY 1,2 X $ 518,873.00 PALMER WEST CONSTRUCTION 1,2 X $ 653,800.00 JOHN A.DALSIN&SON 1,2 X $ 694,956.00 Bid Category 7C-Wall Panels BERWALD ROOFING&SHEETMETAL 1,2 X $ 326,780.00 INNOVATIVE BUILDING CONCEPTS 1,2 X $ 263,500.00 SPECIALTY SYSTEMS 1,2 X $ 347,000.00 Bid Category 7D-Joint Sealants DZIEDZIC CAULKING 1 X $ 99,450.00 RIGHT-WAY CAULKING 1,2 X $ 81,500.00 CARCIOFINI 1,2 X $ 95,345.00 Bid Category 8A-Doors&Hardware(Material Only) MID CENTRAL DOOR 1,2 X $ 209,087.00 Bid Category 8B-Four-Fold&Sectional Doors YALE MECHANICAL 1,2 X $ 698,163.00 CRAWFORD DOORS 1,2 X $ 656,106.00 Bid Category 8C-Glass&Glazing STRUCTURAL GLASS PRODUCTS 1,2 X $ 345,000.00 CAPITAL CITY GLASS 1,2 X $ 415,980.00 ENVISION GLASS 1,2 X $ 402,420.00 Bid Category 9A-Gypsum Board NIEMELA DESIGN&CONSTRUCTION 1,2 X $ 353,423.00 COMMERCIAL DRYWALL 1,2 X $ 458,095.00 MULCAHY NICKOLAUS 1,2 X $ 469,500.00 OLMPIMC COMPANIES 1 X $ 368,465.00 RTL CONSTRUCTION 1,2 X $ 339,000.00 ZINTL INC 1,2 X $ 348,225.00 PINNACLE WALL SYSTEMS 1,2 X $ 361,700.00 Bid Category 9B-Tile CD TILE&STONE 1 X $ 92,500.00 WTG TERRAllO&TILE 1,2 X $ 75,340.00 ADVANCED TERRAllO&TILE 1,2 X $ 112,800.00 GRAllINI BROTHERS 1,2 X $ 119,875.00 TIM'S CONSTRUCTION GROUP 1,2 X $ 82,571.00 Bid Category 9C-Acoustical Ceilings TWIN CITY ACOUSTICS 1,2 X $ 38,300.00 KIRK ACOUSTICS 1,2 X $ 52,800.00 SONUS INTERIORS 1,2 X $ 42,685.00 Bid Category 9D-Flooring ST.PAUL LINOLEUM 1,2 X $ 137,125.00 GRAllINI BROTHERS 1,2 X $ 138,765.00 SONUS INTERIORS 1,2 X $ 117,700.00 COMMERCIAL FLOORING SERVICES 1,2 X $ 122,415.00 Bid Category 9E-Epoxy Flooring ST.PAUL LINOLEUM 1,2 X $ 397,898.00 STARTING LINE FLOOR COATINGS 1,2 X $ 125,724.00 STONHARD 1,2 X $ 175,022.00 MAVO 1,2 X $ 199,900.00 PRO MAINTENANCE 1,2 X $ 154,564.00 QUALITY CLEANING(QC COMPANIES) 1,2 $ 115,885.00 GRAllINI BROTHERS 1,2 X $ 350,890.00 TMI COATINGS 1,2 X $ 320,000.00 SWANSON&YOUNDALE 1,2 X $ 288,639.00 SWEDBRO 1,2 X $ 84,150.00 Bid Category 9F-Painting MULCAHY NICKOLAUS 1,2 X $ 188,100.00 SWANSON&YOUNGDALE 1,2 X $ 247,720.00 Bid Category 14A-Elevator SCHINDLER ELEVATOR 1,2 X $ 126,400.00 TK ELEVATOR 1,2 X $ 129,550.00 Bid Category 21A-Fire Sprinkler NOVA FIRE 1,2 X $ 139,000.00 DYNAMIC FIRE PROTECTION 1,2 X $ 184,142.00 VIKING SPRINKLER 1,2 X $ 174,800.00 NASSEFF MEHCANICAL 1,2 X $ 224,000.00 SUMMIT FIRE 1,2 X $ 170,954.00 Bid Category 22A-Plumbing&HVAC NEW LINE MECHANICAL 1,2 X $ 2,480,000.00 PETERSON SHEET METAL 1,2 X S 3,236,000.00 MCDOWALL COMPANY 1,2 X $ 2,930,700.00 DAVIS MECHANCIAL SYSTEMS 1,2 X $ 2,780,000.00 EL-JAY PLUMBING&HEATING 1,2 X $ 2,825,000.00 KLAMM MECHANICAL 1,2 X $ 3,039,300.00 HARTY MECHANICAL 1,2 X $ 2,498,000.00 RJ MECHANICAL 1,2 X $ 2,800,000.00 WNEZEL PLYMOUTH PLUMBING 1,2 X $ 2,936,150.00 PIONEER POWER 1,2 X $ 3,100,000.00 MODERN 1,2 X $ 3,064,000.00 ST.CLOUD REFRIGERATION 1,2 X $ 2,788,000.00 Bid Category 26A-Electrical LAKETOWN ELECTRIC COMPANY 1,2 X $ 1,530,720.00 GUNNAR ELECTRIC 1,2 X $ 1,666,250.00 SCHAMMEL ELECTRIC 1,2 X $ 1,595,000.00 VINCO 1,2 X $ 1,470,230.00 Bid Category 31A-Building Demolition&Earthwork G URBAN COMPANIES 1,2 X $ 1,050,000.00 MAX STEININGER 1,2 X $ 780,076.11 RACHEL CONTRACTING 1,2 X $ 774,883.00 SM HENTGES&SONS 1,2 X $ 757,260.00 FRATTALONE COMPANIES 1,2 X $ 843,650.00 PARK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 1,2 X $ 740,960.00 Bid Category 32A-Fencing CENTURY FENCE 1,2 X $ 56,660.00 KELLER FENCE 1,2 X $ 61,507.00 PETERSON COMPANIES 1,2 X $ 73,050.00 Bid Category 32B-Asphalt MINNESOTA PAVING AND MATERIALS 1,2 X $ 100,200.00 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS 1,2 X $ 103,500.00 MCNAMARA CONTRACTING 1,2 X $ 86,500.00 NORTHWEST ASPHALT 1,2 X $ 103,200.00 Bid Category 32C-Site Concrete CURB MASTERS 1,2 X $ 599,000.00 NORTH COUNTRY CONCRETE 1,2 X $ 704,162.00 STAPF CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION 1,2 X $ 571,700.00 EBERT 1,2 X $ 288,200.00 Bid Category 32D-Landscaping G URBAN COMPANIES 1,2 X $ 330,000.00 AUTUMN RIDGE LANDSCAPING 1,2 X S 198,900.00 ALBRECHT ENTERPRISES 1,2 X $ 269,082.00 GREAT NORTHERN LANDSCAPES 1,2 X $ 326,870.00 GREENSCAPE COMPANIES 1,2 X $ 265,308.00 MARGOLIS COMPANY 1,2 X S 291,410.00 NORTH METRO COMPANIES 1,2 X $ 173,679.25 HOFFMAN&MCNAMARA 1,2 X $ 259,530.00 PETERSON COMPANIES 1,2 X $ 285,424.00 CEDAR RIDGE LANDSCAPING 1,2 X $ 208,495.00 Bid Category 33A-Site Utilities ST PAUL UTILITIES&EXCAVATING 1,2 X $ 534,000.00 RACHEL CONTRACTING 1,2 X $ 546,606.00 SM HENTGES&SONS 1,2 X $ 637,600.00 FRATTALONE COMPANIES 1,2 X $ 672,250.00 PARK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 1,2 X $ 506,800.00 1 Terra CONSTRUCTION Low Bid Summary Apple Valley Fire Station #2& Improvements to#1& #3 Bid Opening: November 17,2022 @ 2:00pm Bid #of Bids Category=IL Description Low Bids Received D Estimate Hig i s Apparent Low Bidders Received Notes 3A Concrete $ 662,000.00 $ 900,702.00 $ 922,750.00 THOMSON CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 5 3B Precast Concrete(Allowance until Rebid) $ 100,000.00 $ 64,224.00 $ - N/A-Both Bids Rejected 2 Both Bids Rejected by the City. Will Re-Bid this Category _ 4A Masonry $ 1,708,000.00 $ 2,077,067.00 $ 2,022,175.00 J&K MASONRY 3 5A Steel Supply&Install $ 1,163,700.00 $ 1,177,192.00 $ 1,345,800.00 RED CEDAR STEEL ERECTORS 4 _ 6A Carpentry $ 443,000.00 $ 452,465.06 $ 483,000.00 EBERT 3 6B Casework $ 132,714.56 $ 166,255.00 $ 218,500.00 WOODSIDE INDUSTRIES 4 7A Waterproofing&Air Barriers $ 67,697.00 $ 120,806.25 $ 181,784.00 SWANSON&YOUNGDALE 7 7B Roofing $ 516,000.00 $ 557,270.00 $ 694,956.00 BERWALD ROOFING 4 7C Wall Panels $ 263,500.00 $ 339,315.00 $ 347,000.00 INNOVATIVE BUILDING CONCEPTS 3 7D Joint Sealants $ 81,500.00 $ 97,800.00 $ 99,450.00 RIGHT-WAY CAULKING 3 8A Doors,Frames&Hardware(Material Only) $ 209,087.00 $ 279,867.00 $ 209,087.00 MID CENTRAL DOOR 1 8B Four-Fold&Sectional Doors $ 656,106.00 $ 732,000.00 $ 698,163.00 CRAWFORD DOORS 2 8C Glass&Glazing $ 345,000.00 $ 352,378.50 $ 415,980.00 SGP 3 9A Gypsum Board $ 339,000.00 $ 421,707.00 $ 469,500.00 RTL CONSTRUCTION 8 9B Tile $ 75,340.00 $ 103,180.00 $ 119,875.00 WTG TERRAllO&TILE 5 9C Acoustical Ceilings $ 38,300.00 $ 48,987.57 $ 52,800.00 TWIN CITY ACOUSTICS 3 9D Flooring $ 117,700.00 $ 141,859.40 $ 137,125.00 SONUS INTERIORS 4 9E Epoxy Flooring $ 84,150.00 $ 131,684.72 $ 397,898.00 SWEDEBRO 10 9F Painting $ 188,100.00 $ 141,544.50 $ 247,720.00 MULCAHY NICKOLAUS 2 14A Elevator $ 126,400.00 $ 128,125.00 $ 129,550.00 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR 2 21A Fire Sprinkler $ 139,000.00 $ 155,512.00 $ 224,000.00 NOVA FIRE 5 22A Plumbing&HVAC $ 2,480,000.00 $ 2,960,444.00 $ 3,236,000.00 NEW LINE MECHANICAL 12 i 26A Electrical $ 1,470,230.00 $ 1,581,630.00 $ 1,666,250.00 VINCO ELECTRIC 4 31A Building Demolition&Earthwork $ 740,960.00 $ 661,175.00 $ 1,050,000.00 PARK CONSTRUCTION 6 32A Fencing $ 56,660.00 $ 10,040.00 $ 73,050.00 CENTURY FENCE 3 32B Asphalt $ 86,500.00 $ 49,776.00 $ 103,500.00 McNAMARA CONSTRUCTION 4 32C Site Concrete $ 571,700.00 $ 549,486.00 $ 704,162.00 STAPF CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION 4 Ebert(low bidder)withdrew their bid 32D Landscaping $ 173,679.25 $ 266,197.00 $ 330,000.00 NORTH METRO COMPANIES 10 33A Site Utilities $ 506,800.00 $ 527,923.00 $ 672,250.00 PARK CONSTRUCTION 5 SUBTOTAL $ 13,542,823.81 $ 15,196,613.00 $ 17,252,325.00 131 I CM Services,General Requirements,Permits $ 1,240,165.00 S 1,240,165.00 $ 1,240,165.00 CM Fee(1.5%) $ 221,744.83 $ 246,551.67 $ 277,387.35 CD Estimate Contingency $ - $ 813,702.33 $ - TOTAL(Excluding Soft Costs) $ 15,004,733.64 6 17,497,032.00 $ 18,769,877.35 • ITEM: 4.N. ..... :�. Appleil COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 8, 2022 Valley SECTION: Consent Agenda Description: Adopt Resolution Levying Special Assessments Roll No. 687 for Pahl Family Limited Partnership I I Staff Contact: Department/ Division: Brandon Anderson, City Engineer Engineering Division ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the resolution approving the adoption and levying of Special Assessments Roll No. 687 for Pahl Family Limited Partnership II, a Minnesota limited partnership, in the amount of $26,820.42. SUMMARY: As part of the Assessment Agreement between Pahl Family Limited Partnership II and the City of Apple Valley all costs associated with Trunk Charges for sanitary sewer, storm and water connections were to be Specially Assessed to the impacted properties at the request of the property owner. Also, as part of the building permit process, this specific work and amount has been agreed upon and ready to be released between the owner and City of Apple Valley, and the proposed assessment rolls are ready to be provided to the County Auditor. BACKGROUND: N/A BUDGET IMPACT: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Resolution Exhibit Exhibit CITY OF APPLE VALLEY RESOLUTION NO. 2022- RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ADOPTION AND LEVYING OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS WHEREAS,the property owners Pahl Family Limited Partnership II, a Minnesota limited partnership., signed an Assessment agreement on November 28, 2022. BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Apple Valley, Dakota County,Minnesota, as follows: 1. The Finance Director has calculated the amount proper and necessary to be specially assessed for improvements in the areas described, as set forth in Exhibit A, against every assessable lot,piece or parcel of land affected thereby upon the basis of benefits without regard to cash valuation in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes Annotated, Section 429. 2. This Council, finds each of the lots,pieces and parcels of land enumerated in the proposed assessment rolls, in the aggregate amount of$26,820.42,was and is specially benefited by an increase in the market value of the properties by the construction of said improvement is not less than the amount of assessment set opposite the description of each lot,piece and parcel of land,respectively, and that such amount so set out is hereby levied against each of the respective lots,pieces and parcels of land described in Exhibit B. 3. The proposed assessment rolls are hereby adopted and confirmed as the proper special assessments for each of said lots. Each assessment,together with interest at the rates set forth in Exhibit A, accruing on the full amount thereof, from time to time unpaid, shall be a lien concurrent with one(1)year's interest on that and other unpaid installments to be payable with the general taxes for each consecutive year thereafter until the entire assessment is paid. 4. The Assistant Finance Director shall, as soon as may be,prepare and transmit to the County Auditor, a Special Assessment Input form as may be prescribed by the County Auditor,to be extended upon the proper tax lists of the County and the County Auditor shall thereafter collect said assessments in the manner provided by law. 1 ADOPTED this 8th day of December,2022. Clint Hooppaw,Mayor ATTEST: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk 2 Exhibit A CITY OF APPLE VALLEY RESOLUTION NUMBER 2022- The assessments against each piece of property will be payable, in equal, consecutive annual installments as hereinafter specified. Interest shall be added at the per annum rate specified on the entire assessment from the date of the resolution levying the assessment until December 31, 2024. The first of said installments will be payable with the general taxes collectible during the year 2024. Each subsequent installment will be payable with one year's interest at said rates on all unpaid installments. Roll 687—Twenty(20) Installments at 6.00% Trunk Storm, Sanitary Sewer and Water Charges for 1.98 acres totaling $26,820.42. This includes the following: UNPLATTED PID#01-03400-76-020 totaling $26,820.42 The area proposed to be assessed is every lot, piece and parcel of land benefited by said connection based upon the benefits received and agreement with the Landowner. DATED this 8th day of December, 2022. Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk City of Apple Valley 7100 147th Street West Apple Valley,Minnesota 55124 Exhibit B CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Resolution No.2022- Table of Contents Adopted Asmt Bond Total Council 12/8/22 Project Business Roll Fund As of Changes Certified to Amounts Number Unit Number Number 12/8/2022 (If Any) Auditor Prepaid Net Individual Rolls Pahl's Market-Trunk Assessments Storm 2022145 5550 687 19,881.18 - 19,881.18 - 19,881.18 Pahl's Market-Trunk Assessments Sanitary/Water 2022145 5400 687 6,939.24 - 6,939.24 - 6,939.24 TOTAL DETAIL 26,820.42 - 26,820.42 - 26,820.42 • ITEM: 4.0. ..... :�. Appleil COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 8, 2022 Valley SECTION: Consent Agenda Description: Approve Assessment Agreement-Trunk Charges with Pahl Family Limited Partnership I I for Pahl's Market at 6885 160th Street W. Staff Contact: Department/ Division: Brandon Anderson, City Engineer Engineering Division ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Assessment Agreement-Trunk Charges with Pahl Family Limited Partnership II, a Minnesota limited partnership, for Pahl's Market at 6885 160th Street W. for trunk utility connection charges. SUMMARY: Pahl's Market is planning to make improvements to the property which include connections to the City's utilities. Pahl Family Limited Partnership II has requested that the trunk utility charges associated with site improvements and connection to City sanitary sewer, storm and water services be assessed against the property. Pahl's has requested and the City agreed that only a portion of the property be used in calculating the trunk charges due and payable upon the issuance of building permits for the improvements. BACKGROUND: N/A BUDGET IMPACT: All costs associated with the agreement would be funded by Pahl Family Limited Partnership II, a Minnesota limited partnership. ATTACHMENTS: Agreement AGREEMENT-TRUNK CHARGES This Assessment Agreement ("Agreement") is made this day of , 2022, by and between Pahl Family Limited Partnership II, a Minnesota limited partnership (hereinafter "Owner"), and the City of Apple Valley, a Minnesota municipal corporation(hereinafter "City") (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Parties"). Recitals Owner is the fee owner of property located in the City of Apple Valley, legally described as: South 466.26 feet of the West One-Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 34, Township 115, Range 20, Dakota County, Minnesota(the "Property"). Owner is proposing to make improvements to the Property which include connections to the City's utilities. The connection to City utilities includes the payment to the City of trunk charges for water, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer. Owner has requested and the City has agreed that only a portion of the Property be used in calculating the trunk charges due and payable upon the issuance of the building permit for the improvements. Owner has requested and the City has agreed to defer the trunk charges due upon the issuance of the building permit as an Assessment upon the terms and conditions herein. Terms and Conditions NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein and other good and valuable considerations, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: • 1. Trunk Charge Area. The Property contains approximately 10.89 acres of land ( See Exhibit "A", attached hereto.) For purposes of calculating the water and storm sewer trunk charges that are due and payable upon issuance of the building permit for the proposed improvement, a land area consisting of 1.98 acres shall be used (See Exhibit`B", attached hereto.) 2. Trunk Charge Amounts. The Following trunk charges shall be due and payable upon the issuance of the building permit for the proposed improvement: Water: $2,988.00 x 1.98 acres = $5,916.24 Storm Sewer: $10,041.00 x 1.98 acres =$19,881.18 Sanitary Sewer': $341.00 x 3 units = $1,023.00 TOTAL TRUNK CHARGE AMOUNT: $ 26,820.42 3. Assessment of Trunk Charges. The City shall levy the Total Trunk Charge Amount as an Assessment against the Property. Owner shall repay the Assessment over a period of twenty (20) years together with six percent (6%) interest per year on the unpaid principal balance. The first installments shall be due and payable in 2024. Owner will have the option to pay the Assessment, without interest, for a period of thirty (30) days following the City's Council levying the Assessment and certifying the assessment to Dakota County for collection. 4. Waiver. Owner hereby accepts the Assessment and hereby waives the right to object or appeal the Assessment pursuant to MINN. STAT. § 429.081 and further waives notice of hearing on this Agreement. 5. Deferred Collection. Owner acknowledges and agrees that additional trunk charges may be due and owing to the City as additional improvements and/or development occur on the Property outside of the area depicted on Exhibit B. Owner further acknowledges and agrees that in calculating additional trunk charges the City may consider the Property or a portion thereof, outside of the area depicted on Exhibit B, as the multiplier in arriving at the amounts due and owing. Notwithstanding the above, no trunk charges will be collected for the construction of additional improvements that are exempt from a building permit under Minnesota Statutes §326B.121 and which do not require a utility permit. 6. Binding Effect. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Owner and its successors and assigns and shall run with the land. Sanitary Sewer Trunk Charge is calculated on the number of units assigned to the building improvements by the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services("MCES"). 2 7. Availability Fees. In addition to the trunk charges noted herein, the Owner agrees to pay the City for the water and sanitary services furnished to the Property, in an amount as determined below upon the basis of units (per building) as determined by the City Engineer, upon the issuance of a building permit: Sanitary Sewer Availability Charge - The rate per unit is based on the year in which the building permit is issued (presently Metro Waste = $2,870 per unit and City = $385.00 per unit). This charge is subject to change if the obligation of the City to MCES changes. Water Supply and Storage Charge - The rate per unit is based on the year in which the building permit is issued(presently $1,045 per unit), Pahl Family Limited Partnership II a Minnesota limited partnership (14-2 By: Gary Pahl, enerai Partner STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) On this 243"day of NOt Ylt' -le-r 2022, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared Gary Pahl, to me personally known, who being by me duly sworn, did say that,he is the General Partner of the limited partnership named in the instrument, and that said instrument was signed on behalf of the limited partnership by authority of the limited partnership and the execution of the instrument is the free act and deed of the limited partnership. .'c 6..__OL.C150 LOAD Notary Publi J. PAMELA J. GACKSTETTER ;•; Notary Public �:,:lf\� My C Stavtem missian of Minnesota ' Expires � � January 31,2022 Ci y dt Apple valley A Minnesota municipal corporation 3 By: Clint Hooppaw, Mayor By: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) On this day of , 2022, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared Clint Hooppaw, Mayor of City of Apple Valley, and Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk, City of Apple Valley. Notary Public This instrument was drafted by: Dougherty, Molenda, Solfest, Hills &Bauer P.A. 14985 Glazier Avenue, Suite 525 Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124 (952) 432-3136 MGD/lmd (66-45421) 4 azzrym ems!-itr'•`i ram' r • - r 0 . 11 )... .1.1. IL, , -„Fi _.fty. ,v, + i ;fJ .14 :it � ' +: vie.• ' ' -— 1 i'l e 1 !*-- f i\ til ',-i'"i. X ., i 1 il, •Ii f . _ j r�3 i I, t ,' t..' \\, . , 01l W iiil ' , I • • i t t. } 7: .. , ` y { war !f, 15/411-i&S-4. ''-'" ' ... '-. 'I . ::: - .. ii 14 :7'Id.' '1-'41 ' • iQ !� '`. '" ' , .Irt f; p � A.2 - ilitimilowimr ,'. .. . . -Lownw ; • 0 i-r v-'''' '.i ''' • • . •• ,.4, ••• ':1 0, ;4 li,_..r .• ill , •1 ,.1.-',•-• „ -, 4. . 4 .' " I '7; ' iF 'L I p 41. 4 10' : .i: . .1. . . : • .Le.rawiry, Viiiiit' / . . , . i ..• .11,. - _ It ••••14kkiti. ; i; !... � � i s -i , " :• 't t rf. .1 1 .t. • F eedomi+' J * f • Sat ,,�t:`'—F "46: . J• ' �' � fir• i ? 1V `, �1 f 47F( 4 J .r•1 r f N 4 °al i. '+. � .P ,. '` 1r.. ..141 .:.r.,,,, . . : , f:Lift: ''.,74 7 'I:1 ,.1'.:' '.."7 li -it f ',r ¢ andi01X0ieD' ;• • P . y q ..J ..t..� :"4if:a • '1 +L;YC?f4.i.1+ �• ltr^ia :�� .�7'•{d ..y .'.f._,_?_. x++.-_- •-`._""•■ rr ,, 4 ttz.M.4 T V. • �.�aKr� •1rlr•- i., It, r. f i / 4 4, •,• G 1 t,_ ..,:i;..._:., -t ,.f r ; ffF • 5'' As �`,Jyi._„y , x • ITEM: 4.P. ..... :�. Appleil COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 8, 2022 Valley SECTION: Consent Agenda Description: Approve Stormwater Maintenance Agreement with Pahl Family Limited Partnership I I for Pahl's Market at 6885 160th Street W. Staff Contact: 'Department/ Division: Brandon Anderson, City Engineer Engineering Division ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the Stormwater Maintenance Agreement with Pahl Family Limited Partnership II, a Minnesota limited partnership, for Pahl's Market at 6885 160th Street W. SUMMARY: In accordance with Apple Valley Code 152.55, and as part of the Site Plan/Building Permit, a condition of approval is that the property owner must execute a Stormwater Maintenance agreement as part of the redevelopment of a portion of the site to accommodate a new building and site improvements. An infiltration basin and permeable pavers are planned to be included with the site improvements. The purpose of the agreement is to ensure that the property owner maintains the stormwater infiltration area in the future. BACKGROUND: N/A BUDGET IMPACT: All costs associated with the agreement would be funded by Pahl Family Limited Partnership II, a Minnesota limited partnership, per the attached agreement. ATTACHMENTS: Agreement STORMWATER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT This Agreement is made by and between Pahl Family Limited Partnership Limited partnership (the "Owner"), and the City of AppleMi IIta mMinnesotamunicipal corporation (the"City"). The Owner and the City shall joiny be referred t Minnesota"P municipal WHEREAS, the Owner is the fee owner of real property o as the"Parties." South 466.26 feet of the West One-Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section P y legally described as follows: 115, Range 20,Dakota County,Minnesota(the "Property"). ct�on 34, Township WHEREAS, the Owner is required to install and maintain an Infiltration pavers, and SAFL Baffle or approved equivalent on a portion of the Property Site Details C0-13,PropQSed Site Plan C3-10, Site UtilityPlan basin, permeable C4-I0 dated 11-I4-2022 and Storm Water Management Report datedp y as depicted on the subsequent revisions as2 approved o City Engineer. C3-ed and the Site Grading Plano byp 11-1 I-2022 including any WHEREAS, the City requires the Owner to install and maintain an Infiltration permeable payers, and SAFL Baffle in accordance with the design specifications as set forth in Exhibit A,attached hereto and incorporated herein, basin, WHEREAS, the purpoSe of installing and maintaining an Infiltration basin, pavers,and SAFL Baffle is on-site storm water management and to promote the water quality and volume control of the City's water bodies. permeable WHEREAS, the Owner and the City desire to make certain mutual provisions to memorialize the allocation ofresponsibilities and obligations for the construction and maintenance of the infiltration basin,as between the Parties, on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals, and the agreements on the part of each Party to the other, as hereinafter set forth, the Parties follows: covenantse and agree as A 1. Construction and Maintenance. 1.2 Construction Re uirernents. The Baffle steall be constructed and maintained in ccordilne�1pn basin, permeable with the Specifications. The basin shall draw down within 48-hours of a 0.5 inch rainfall pavers, and SAFL 1.3 Maintenance Obdi ation.the Infiltration basin, The Owner shall maintain and repair, when necessary, the Infiltration- set forth in phi cablAgree pav rs and SAFL shallB free from no fo wends. The owner steal! maintain inaccordance with the terms and periodically clean and replenish e meth al twetnrihe permeable pavers. If at any time the device fails to conform to the standards set forth herein, the Owner shall immediately correct the non-co the media between the set forth ed remediation plan and The Owner and the Specifications with a City-approved ity aremed pro plan and schedule to repairdschedule.the structureTh tonfurm submit to the accordancepr with a approves the and remedschedule plan and schedule, shall to City a proposed the Ownerne shagrds sete forth herein. If theati City compliance therewith. duIe,the shall perform the remediat.ian in 1.4 Snow and Leaves Removal and Prohibited Stara e. The Owner shall sweep clear the private streets, driveways, area, and walkways on the Property in April or Mayeach saed and salt walkways h the private in driveways, g Y ' penneablee from pavers, parking year to remove from thes PropertyThe Owner all shalleach remove all tree leaves from the Property after they fall to the r year area and walkways.or The ground in October November 1.5 Personal Pro err or Debris Stara a Prohibited. The Owner store any personal property or debris, litter, or other objects— within the sewer structures are located, and the Owner shall keep the curb shall not deposit or curb linesd where storm litter, or other objects. lines free of any debris, leaves, 1.6 Maintenance Costs. The Owner shall incur andpay maintaining and repairing the Infiltration basin, permeable pavers nndall costs associated and with sewer structure associated with it. . � SAFL Baffle and storm 2. ins ections. 2.2 Annual Ins ections. The Infiltration basin, permeable aver shall be inspected annually by a Qualified Person selected by the Ow not the device is functioning in accordance;with the Specifications pavers, and SAFL Baffle Owner this Agreement. t. As used d in this Agreement, the term "Qualified Person"shall mean a profess and Agreement. d the State of Minnesota, or a person approved by the City Engineer based The Owner's responsibilities under this Section shall be Owner'ssal engineer licensed by the as a result r e inspection, the device is t not toon training and experience. Specifications result and this Agreement, the Ownerat the functioningsole cost and ce w th If, be e in accordance with the specified herein. Upon request from the Owners the City the structure to function as Y Engineer may establish an inspection 2 scheschedule permitting such inspections to be performed less dule may permitting reinstatesuch the l inspection oban schedule yfrtime bytly than annually,he at any time by notice to the Owner. the City 2.3 Cit Notification and Inde endent Ins ection, 48 hours prior to the annual inspections or an The City shall be the y maintenance of the device and, at her soled at cost of City, a representative of the City may observe any inspection or have right of entry onto the Property cost of reasonable effortsn to notify the Owner to its s intent the enter devicemaintenance. Cityite City shalle inspect at anyo time, but the shall use the Property to inspect. 2.4 Ins ection and no later than Maintenance Re ort. The owner shall submit a report to the two (2) weeks after any annual inspection or maintenance of permeable pavers, and SAFL Baffle,providing the followinginfo City, a. Date and time of inspectionthe Infiltration basin, b. Log of findings information: c. Date and time of maintenance d. Log of maintenance performed. 3, Remediation and Waiver of Ri fits. 3•1 Remediation Plan. If the City determines that the device pre-treatment removal requirements or any Agreement, the City shall notify the Owner of the deficiency does not conform to the other requirements of the Specifications or this a proposed remediation plan and schedule to the City within thirty notice. ther proposed plan n plan and schedule in (30) The Owner shall submit notify the Owner ofs the deficiency, and an the Ownere able to thedays after ,receipt City such notify y l 4)days after deficiency, of such the O are not submit acceptable e revised City,thehe City shalln shall a plan to City within 3.2 Failure to Re air. If the Owner fails to submit a schedule to the City as prescribed above, or fails to implement a proposed red remedj plan and to bring the device into compliance with the or Specifications, then theo Owner, the City shcII have the right, C at it the S le cost an d d en expense ofn g , but no obligation, to preparel a remediation plan and complete all work necessary to correct so as to bring it into compliance!'ance with the Infiltration Capacity and Specifications. 3.3 Reimbursement to the Cit . 0) days after receipt of an Reimbursement from the Cityfor any The Owner shall reimburse the City within t thirty in connection with preparing a remediation plan for the device and all work completed bring the device back into compliance with the Specifications. by the City in otnPleted by the City to 3.4 Waiver of Ri his. a If the Owner does not timely reimburse the City, the City may recover its costs by levying special assessment against the Property. The Owner, on behalf of itself and its successors and assigns, hereby acknowledges the ben Property and waives any rights to hearings or notice of hearings relating of such levying ofan to the assessments or the right to contest the assessments under Minnesota Statutes g to the levying any City §429.081. 3 � I il!, 3.5 Rg ht of Entr , implement the terms of this Paragraph City shall have the right to enter the property to inspect trespassmnt the Owner. graph 3. The City shall not be subject to or liable for any claims4. of by standards for Performance. Any performed under this Agreement shall be performed to in a f construction, to round engineeringmaintenance, or repairp tou be Practices and in compliance with all a and workmanlike manner pursuant applicable governtnentaI requirements. 5. Amendment Release or Termination. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, no amendment, any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be effective or maybe any consents top the amendment, release or termination.llbeefct Such release frecord o termination Cof ity resolutionConsntsdulytapprovedamendment,byen the City Council, filed t o must unless the City aed its successors and assigns,expresslyacknowledgeso Consent n ,b evidenced ofitselfby a seer agreey. The Owner, has behalfnoo whatsoever to approve or act upon anyand agrees that the City no obligation or delay consent for any reason or no reason whatsoever, any proposed amendment,release or termination,may withhold terms as the City deems desirable. The Owner, on behalf of itself and termer agrees and covenants, consistent with this eh may condition consent upon such Furthproceedingsagrees against the ant on the gent that the its toc institute e and anyassigns,lal acknowledgment,adgmeot, notrespond to appr pr legal proposed amendment, release or termination and to indemnify proposed tigation co which the Cityi nde failed to City against appropriately to a covenant. The Cityn viheolation Citybyh any y of this may,at any time, incurs as a result of any violatgan that party of this to be evidenced by City Council resolution or therve u thelf format aht to prova!granted hereunder, said action 6. Duration. This Agreement shall constitute a pproved by the City Attorney. ll be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Parties, and any and all rnt runein g withf their successors land and shacessors and assigns. 7. RecordingA regiment. The Owner shall record this Agreement the Dakota County Recorder's Office within thirty (30) days of full execution the City with verification of recording within ninety (�0 g erit against the Property with o and shall provide )day of full execution of this Agreement. 8. Governin Law. The laws of the State of Minnesota shall validity,performance, and enforcement of this Agreement• govern the interpretation, [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGES] 4 Pahl Family Limited Partnership II a Minnesota limited partnership - By: Ail-- 14Q Gary Pahl, Ge1ieral Partner STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) On this 3Thday of N OVe:ri'g - 022, before me a Notary Public within and for said County,personally appeared Gary Pahl,to me personally known, who being by me duly sworn, did say that he is the General Partner of the limited partnership named in the instrument, and that said instrument was signed on behalf of the limited partnership by authority of the limited partnership and the execution of the instrument is the free act and deed of the limited partnership. 76LArrUl le�Notary Coea" PAMELA J. GACKSTETTER �q Notary Public State of Minnesota *J l My Commission Expires January 31,.2022 5 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY By: Clint Hooppaw Its: Mayor By: Pamela J. Gackstetter Its: City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2022, by Clint Hooppaw and Pamela J. Gackstetter,the Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Apple Valley, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation. Notary Public This instrument was drafted by: Dougherty, Molenda, Solfest, Hills & Bauer P.A. 14985 Glazier Avenue, Suite 525 Apple Valley,Minnesota 55124 (952) 432-3136 MGD/lmd(0066-45421) 6 • ITEM: 4.Q. ..... .�. Appleil COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 8, 2022 Valley SECTION: Consent Agenda Description: Approve Agreement with AVI Systems, Inc., for Purchase and Delivery of Audio & Video Equipment Staff Contact: Department/ Division: Charles Grawe,Assistant City Administrator Administration/ Information Technologies ACTION REQUESTED: Approve agreement with AVI Systems, Inc., for Purchase and Delivery of Audio & Video Equipment in the amount of$67,987.74. SUMMARY: The Apple Valley, Farmington & Rosemount Cable Commission (AFRCC) administers cable television franchises for each of its member cities under authority of a Joint Powers Cooperative Agreement (JPA). In addition, video related services are provided for each member city which includes the operation of each local Government and Public Access channel(s) available to all subscribers of local cable television. This agreement is for equipment replacement of the automated video playback system used for operating the access channels on cable television. BACKGROUND: Staff solicited quotes from two area vendors: AVI Systems Inc. $67,987.74 Advanced Systems Integration $71,648.46 Staff recommends approval of a standard form agreement with AVI Systems Inc. for Purchase and Delivery of Audio & Video Equipment in the amount of$67,987.74. BUDGET IMPACT: Funding for this project comes from PEG fees collected by companies with franchise agreements. As Apple Valley is the fiscal entity for the commission, the Cities of Farmington and Rosemount will reimburse the City of Apple Valley for their share of the project. • ITEM: 4.R. ..... Appleil COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 8, 2022 Valley SECTION: Consent Agenda Description: Approve Community Waste Abatement 2023 Grant Agreement with Dakota County and Cities of Apple Valley, Burnsville, Eagan, and Lakeville Staff Contact: Department/ Division: Charles Grawe,Assistant City Administrator Administration/ Information Technologies ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the Community Waste Abatement 2023 Grant Agreement with Dakota County and the Cities of Apple Valley, Burnsville, Eagan and Lakeville d/b/a Dakota Valley Recycling. SUMMARY: In 2003, the City began joint services with the Cities of Burnsville and Eagan to provide recycling. The agreement was expanded to included Lakeville in 2016. This agreement allows the four cities to share staff dedicated to the recycling mission, while alleviating City staff in other departments from recycling duties so that they can focus on other issues. Staff believes the joint effort yields a more efficient and cost-effective recycling operation. Burnsville employees provide the services for Apple Valley, Eagan and Lakeville, answering residents' questions about recycling and disposal and working with each city to reduce waste, reduce contamination of recyclables, and increase environmentally preferable purchases. BACKGROUND: Dakota County provides funding to cities to promote and operate Waste Abatement (Recycling) Programs. In previous years, the County requested cities adopt resolutions supporting grant applications and later used joint powers agreements. For 2023, the County is requesting this process be done through an agreement with the County. The new agreement does require a 25 percent cash or in-kind funding match. Staff believes that existing City activity will meet the required in-kind match, but it will require the City to track and document these activities. Staff recommends the Council approve the attached, providing up to $331,370.00 from Dakota County to operate a joint Recycling Program for the Cities of Apple Valley, Burnsville, Eagan, and Lakeville and authorize the Mayor to sign the document. BUDGET IMPACT: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Agreement COMMUNITY WASTE ABATEMENT 2023 GRANT AGREEMENT This Community Waste Abatement Grant Agreement(Agreement) is made and entered into by and between the County of Dakota, acting through its Environmental Resources Department (County) and City of Burnsville, itself and acting as the fiscal agent for the cities of Apple Valley, Eagan, and Lakeville (Grantees). WHEREAS, Metropolitan counties are responsible for waste management policy and programs (Minn. Stat. §115A.551); and WHEREAS, Dakota County Solid Waste Ordinance 110 requires each municipality in the County to have a solid waste abatement program that is consistent with the Dakota County Solid Waste Master Plan (Master Plan); and WHEREAS, the Dakota County Solid Waste Master Plan (Master Plan)governs all solid waste management in the County (Minn. Stat. § 115A.46); and WHEREAS, municipalities may not develop or implement a solid waste management activity that is inconsistent with the Master Plan (Minn. Stat. § 115A.46); and WHEREAS, the Master Plan supports performance-based funding for municipalities to develop and implement waste abatement programs, education, and outreach; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 19-577 (June 18, 2019), the Dakota County Board of Commissioners approved the Community Waste Abatement Grant Program; and WHEREAS, funding amounts are established by the County Board each year as part of the Environmental Resources Department(Department) budget; and WHEREAS, the Grantees agree to perform all activities described in this Agreement and Dakota County Waste Abatement Community Grant Program Exhibits 1 (Guidelines) and 2 (Application)(collectively referred to as the "Exhibits") to the satisfaction of the County. NOW THEREFORE, in reliance on the above statements and in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained in this Agreement, the County and the Grantees agree as follows: AGREEMENT 1. PURPOSE. The purpose of this Agreement is to provide grant funding to eligible municipalities to implement solid waste abatement activities as described in this Agreement and the Exhibits. 2. ELIGIBILITY. Eligible municipalities include Apple Valley, Burnsville, Eagan, Farmington, Hastings, Inver Grove Heights, Lakeville, Lilydale, Mendota, Mendota Heights, Rosemount, South St. Paul, Sunfish Lake and West St. Paul. 3. PARTIES. The parties to this Agreement are the County and Grantees, collectively referred to as the "parties". 4. TERM. Notwithstanding the dates of signatures of the parties to this Agreement, this Agreement shall commence on January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023, (grant calendar year)for the purposes of completing activities identified in Exhibit 2 and shall continue until April 1, 2024, for the purpose of reimbursement, unless earlier terminated by law or according to the provisions of this Agreement. 5. GRANTEES OBLIGATIONS. The Grantees shall: A. Develop, implement, and operate a local comprehensive landfill abatement program that complies with the Master Plan, Dakota County Solid Waste Ordinance 110, this Agreement, and the Exhibits. B. Fulfill all responsibilities for Base and, if applicable, for Supplemental Funding as outlined in Exhibit 1. C. Report time, expense, and performance pursuant to responsibilities set forth in this Agreement using County report forms (Exhibit 2) and additional agreed-upon reporting tools provided by the County Liaison. Dakota County Contract#C0036103 2023 Grant Agreement Page I 1 of 8 6. ELIGIBLE AND INELIGIBLE EXPENSES. Grantees may use allocated funds only on eligible items as identified in Exhibit 1 and completed within the calendar year of this Agreement. Other waste abatement expenses may be eligible with prior written approval from the County Liaison. 7. FUNDING AMOUNT. Grantees receive performance-based funding in part from a pass-through grant from the State. Funding amounts are contingent upon available State and County funds and reflect the funding levels approved by the County Board as part of the annual budget. Base Funding is allocated for administration, residential communications, municipal facilities best management verification and employee education, and special collections. Optional Supplemental Funding is allocated for multifamily recycling, additional special collections or reduce/reuse activities, in-person education, event recycling/organics, and to meet funding gaps in eligible grant categories. The allocated funding for the Grantees, or the fiscal agent of a legal entity acting on their behalf, shall be in the total amount not to exceed $331,370.00, as set forth in Exhibit 2. 8. FUNDING MATCH. Grantees shall provide a 25% match of the total reimbursed grant funding amount through a cash match, in-kind contribution, or combination thereof, to pay for any new or ongoing activities that are instituted by the grant (i.e., any eligible expenses, whether new or ongoing). 9. FUNDING SOURCE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT. Provide funding source credit on all print materials, written as: Partially funded by Dakota County and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. 10. RECORDS. The Grantees shall maintain financial and other records and accounts in accordance with requirements of the County and the State of Minnesota. The Grantees shall manage funds in a dedicated bank account, maintain strict accountability of all funds and maintain records of all receipts and disbursements. Such records and accounts shall be maintained in a form which will permit the tracing of funds and program income to final expenditure. All records and accounts shall be retained as provided by law, but in no event for a period of less than five years from the last receipt of payment from the County pursuant to this Agreement. 11. PERFORMANCE REPORTING AND REIMBURSEMENT. Grantees shall report performance of responsibilities set forth in this Agreement and the Exhibits on a report form provided by the County. Grantees may request reimbursement for eligible expenses, less revenues or other funds received, incurred in connection with the performance of activities in accordance with this Agreement and the Exhibits on a reimbursement form provided by the County. Reimbursement requests must be submitted to the County Liaison by July 15 of the grant calendar year and by January 15 following the grant calendar year. The Grantees must certify that the requested reimbursements are accurate, appropriate and eligible in accordance with this Agreement, that the Grantees have submitted complete documentation of the actual expenditures for which reimbursement is sought, and that such expenditures have not been otherwise reimbursed. Reimbursement requests must be supported by documentation such as vendor invoices, receipts, or detailed financial reports produced using municipal accounting software, itemizing all expenses related to the grant, including salary and benefits. Any reimbursement request for multiple municipalities must separately itemize the request for reimbursement for each individual municipality. Reimbursement request payment will not be made for activities with incomplete documentation. Complete reimbursement requests are reviewed by the County Liaison. Payment for approved reimbursement requests will be made to the Grantees within 30 calendar days of approved reimbursement request submissions. Reimbursements will be made for approved expenditures incurred within the grant calendar year. No reimbursements will be made for reimbursement requests received after February 15 following the grant calendar year. 12. FAILURE TO PERFORM. Upon review of each Grantees report, the County Liaison will notify the Grantees in writing of any unsatisfactory performance. Reimbursements will be authorized only for activities performed to the satisfaction of the County within the terms of this Agreement. 13. AMENDMENTS. The Dakota County Environmental Resources Director(Director)shall have the authority to approve modifications to the Funding Amount as requested by the Grantees, as long as the amount payable does not exceed the amount allocated in Section 7 and so long as the proposed modifications are consistent with the Agreement and Exhibits. The County Liaison shall have the authority to approve modifications to the Application activities and related expenses within a funding category as requested by the Grantees, so long as the proposed modifications are consistent with the Agreement and Exhibits. Dakota County Contract#C0036103 2023 Grant Agreement Page 1 2 of 8 14. PROPERTY. Upon termination of this Agreement or unless otherwise specified, any eligible infrastructure purchased by the Grantees or by the County and provided to the Grantees to fulfill Grant obligations shall be the sole property of the Grantees. 15. INDEMNIFICATION. Each party to this Agreement shall be liable for the acts of its officers, employees or agents and the results thereof to the extent authorized by law and shall not be responsible for the acts of the other party, its officers, employees or agents. The provisions of the Municipal Tort Claims Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 466 and other applicable laws govern liability of the County and Grantees. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 16. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES: The following named persons are designated as the Authorized Representatives of the Parties for purposes of this Agreement. These persons have authority to bind the party they represent and to consent to modifications, except that the Authorized Representatives shall have only the authority specifically granted by their respective governing boards. The parties shall provide written notification to each other of any change to the Authorized Representative. Notice required to be provided pursuant this Agreement shall be provided to the following named persons and addresses unless otherwise stated in this Agreement, or in a modification of this Agreement. TO THE COUNTY TO THE GRANTEES Nikki Stewart, Director, or successor Elizabeth Kautz, or successor, Mayor Environmental Resources Department Clint Hooppaw, or successor, Mayor 14955 Galaxie Avenue Mike Maguire, or successor, Mayor Apple Valley, MN 55124 Doug Anderson, or successor, Mayor 17. LIAISONS. To assist the parties in the day-to-day performance of this Agreement, to ensure compliance, and provide ongoing consultation, a liaison shall be designated by the County and the Grantees. The County and the Grantees shall keep each other continually informed, in writing, of any change in the designated liaison. At the time of execution of this Agreement, the following persons are the designated liaisons: COUNTY LIAISON GRANTEE LIAISON Gena Gerard Jackson Becker, or successor Environmental Specialist Environmental Specialist 952-891-7021 952-895-4511 gena.gerard©co.dakota.mn.us jackson.becker@burnsvillemn.gov 18. TERMINATION, GENERAL. Either party may terminate this Agreement for cause by giving seven days' written notice or without cause by giving thirty (30) days' written notice, of its intent to terminate, to the other party. Such notice to terminate for cause shall specify the circumstances warranting termination of the Agreement. Cause shall mean a material breach of this Agreement and any supplemental agreements or amendments thereto. Notice of Termination shall be made by certified mail or personal delivery to the Authorized Representative of the other party. In addition, notification to the County or the Grantees regarding termination of this Agreement by the other party shall be provided to the Office of the Dakota County Attorney, Civil Division, 1560 Highway 55, Hastings, MN 55033. Termination of this Agreement shall not discharge any liability, responsibility or right of any party, which arises from the performance of or failure to adequately perform the terms of this Agreement prior to the effective date of termination. 19. TERMINATION BY COUNTY FOR LACK OF FUNDING. Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to the contrary, the County may immediately terminate this Agreement if it does not obtain funding from the Minnesota Legislature, Minnesota Agencies, or other funding source, or if its funding cannot be continued at a level sufficient to allow payment of the amounts due under this Agreement. Written notice of termination sent by the County to the Grantees by email or facsimile is sufficient notice under this section. The County is not obligated to pay for any services that are provided after written notice of termination for lack of funding. The County will not be assessed any penalty or damages if the Agreement is terminated due to lack of funding. 20. USE OF CONTRACTORS. The Grantees may engage contractors to perform activities funded pursuant to this Agreement. However, the Grantees retain primary responsibility to the County for performance of the activities and the use of such contractors does not relieve the Grantees from any of its obligations under this Agreement. If the Grantees engages any contractors to perform any part of the activities, the Grantees agree that the contract for such services shall include the following provisions: Dakota County Contract#C0036103 2023 Grant Agreement Page 1 3 of 8 A. The contractor must maintain all records and provide all reporting as required by this Agreement. B. The contractor must defend, indemnify, and hold harmless and save the County from all claims, suits, demands, damages,judgments, costs, interest, and expenses arising out of or by reason of the performance of the contracted work, caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission of the contractor, including negligent acts or omissions of its employees, subcontractors, or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable. C. The contractor must provide and maintain insurance through the term of this Agreement in amounts and types of coverage as set forth in the Insurance Terms, which is attached and incorporated as Exhibit 3, and provide to the County, prior to commencement of the contracted work, a certificate of insurance evidencing such insurance coverage. D. The contractor must be an independent contractor for the purposes of completing the contracted work. E. The contractor must acknowledge that the contract between the Grantees and the contractor does not create any contractual relationship between County and the contractor. F. The contractor shall perform and complete the activities in full compliance with this Agreement and all applicable laws, statutes, rules, ordinances, and regulations issued by any federal, state, or local political subdivisions having jurisdiction over the activities. G. The contractor must use County toolkits (i.e., text, content, images) and follow the County's Waste Abatement Education and Outreach Style Guide to provide standardized messaging. 21. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS/STANDARDS. The County and Grantees agree to abide by all federal, state or local laws, statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations now in effect or hereafter adopted pertaining to this Agreement or to the facilities, programs and staff for which either party is responsible, including but not limited to Minn. Stat. § 115A, which requires cities to collect recyclable materials at all facilities under their control, wherever trash is collected, and to transfer the recyclable materials to a recycler. 22. EXCUSED DEFAULT— FORCE MAJEURE. Neither party shall be liable to the other party for any loss or damage resulting from a delay or failure to perform due to unforeseeable acts or events outside the defaulting party's reasonable control, providing the defaulting party gives notice to the other party as soon as possible. Acts and events may include acts of God, acts of terrorism, war, fire, flood, epidemic, acts of civil or military authority, and natural disasters. 23. CONTRACT RIGHTS CUMULATIVE NOT EXCLUSIVE. A. In General. All remedies available to either party for breach of this Agreement are cumulative and may be exercised concurrently or separately, and the exercise of any one remedy shall not be deemed an election of such remedy to the exclusion of other remedies. The rights and remedies provided in this Agreement are not exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law. B. Waiver. Any waiver is only valid when reduced to writing, specifically identified as a waiver, and signed by the waiving party's Authorized Representative. A waiver is not an amendment to the Contract. The County's failure to enforce any provision of this Contract does not waive the provision or the County's right to enforce it. 24. RECORDS RETENTION AND AUDITS. Each party's bonds, records, documents, papers, accounting procedures and practices, and other records relevant to this Agreement are subject to the examination, duplication, transcription and audit by the other party, the Legislative Auditor or State Auditor under Minn. Stat. § 16C.05, subd. 5. If any funds provided under this Agreement use federal funds these records are also subject to review by the Comptroller General of the United States and his or her approved representative. Following termination of this Agreement, the parties must keep these records for at least six years or longer if any audit-in-progress needs a longer retention time. 25. MODIFICATIONS. Any alterations, variations, modifications, or waivers of the provisions of this Agreement shall only be valid when they have been reduced to writing and signed by the authorized representatives of the County and Grantees. 26. ASSIGNMENT. Neither party may assign any of its rights under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the other party. Consent under this section may be subject to conditions. Dakota County Contract#C0036103 2023 Grant Agreement Page 1 4 of 8 27. GOVERNMENT DATA PRACTICES. For purposes of this Agreement, all data on individuals collected, created, received, maintained or disseminated shall be administered consistent with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 13. 28. MINNESOTA LAW TO GOVERN. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the substantive and procedural laws of the State of Minnesota, without giving effect to the principles of conflict of laws. All proceedings related to this Agreement shall be venued in Dakota County, Minnesota or U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 29. MERGER. This Agreement is the final expression of the agreement of the parties and the complete and exclusive statement of the terms agreed upon and shall supersede all prior negotiations, understandings, or agreements. There are no representations, warranties, or provisions, either oral or written, not contained herein. 30. SEVERABILITY. The provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed severable. If any part of this Agreement is rendered void, invalid, or unenforceable, such rendering shall not affect the validity and enforceability of the remainder of this Agreement unless the part or parts that are void, invalid or otherwise unenforceable shall substantially impair the value of the entire Agreement with respect to either party. 31. ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES. Each party agrees that the electronic signatures of the parties included in this Contract are intended to authenticate this writing and to have the same force and effect as wet ink signatures. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which so executed and delivered counterpart is original, and such counterparts, together, shall constitute the same instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date(s) indicated below. FOR DAKOTA COUNTY CITY OF BURNSVILLE (I represent and warrant that I am authorized to (I represent and warrant that I am authorized by law to execute this contract on behalf of Dakota County.) execute this contract and legally bind the Grantee.) By: By: Nikki Stewart, Director Elizabeth Kautz, Mayor Environmental Resources Department Date of signature: Date of signature: By: Ryan Peterson, Public Works Director APPROVED AS TO FORM: Date of signature: /s/ Dain L. Olson 11/22/22 Assistant County Attorney/Date KS-22-586-004 Dakota County Contract#C0036103 County Board Res. No. 19-577 Dakota County Contract#C0036103 2023 Grant Agreement Page I5 of 8 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY (I represent and warrant that I am authorized by law to execute this contract and legally bind the Grantee.) By: Clint Hooppaw, Mayor Date of signature: Attest: Title: Date: Dakota County Contract#C0036103 2023 Grant Agreement Page I6 of 8 CITY OF EAGAN (I represent and warrant that I am authorized by law to execute this contract and legally bind the Grantee.) By: Mike Maguire, Mayor Date of signature: Attest: Title: Date: Dakota County Contract#C0036103 2023 Grant Agreement Page i 7 of 8 CITY OF LAKEVILLE (I represent and warrant that I am authorized by law to execute this contract and legally bind the Grantee.) By: Doug Anderson, Mayor Date of signature: Attest: Title: Date: Dakota County Contract#C0036103 2023 Grant Agreement Page i 8 of 8 • ITEM: 4.S. ..... :�. Appleil COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 8, 2022 Valley SECTION: Consent Agenda Description: Approve Acceptance and Final Payment on Agreement with Swedebro, Inc., for Apple Valley Police Facility Concrete Flooring Staff Contact: Department/ Division: Charles Grawe,Assistant City Administrator Administration/ Information Technologies ACTION REQUESTED: Approve acceptance and final payment on agreement with Swedebro, Inc., for Apple Valley Police Facility Concrete Flooring in the amount of$28,000.00. SUMMARY: Most of the carpet in the Police Facility portion of the Municipal Center is original to the construction in 1994. The existing flooring was significantly worn and due for replacement. The total cost of the original project was $28,000.00. There were no change orders. The final cost of the project is $28,000.00. BACKGROUND: This project replaced carpeting in the first floor and lower level halls, briefing room, officer cubes, evidence lab, and kitchens with an epoxy coating over concrete. A similar process was used in the Community Center and has been used in other police facilities. Staff recommends the Council approve acceptance and final payment on agreement with Swedebro, Inc., for Apple Valley Police Facility Concrete Flooring in the amount of$28,000.00, contingent on completion of warranty work scheduled on November 29, 2022 and contingent upon approval by the City Administrator. BUDGET IMPACT: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Final Pay Documents Invoice City of Apple Valley CITY OF APPLE VALLEY APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT ) I DATE: 1 L(% /25(2�/ZZ" FOR PERIOD: { PROJECT: T O1I e.. rrf000t FROM: t!/`qk TO: l� L- CONTRACTOR: S1/4-° 'kt) REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO. L ADDRESS: ((40 K / ( 13 At' NZ SUMMARY: 1. Original Contract Amount $ 2. Change Order-ADDITION $ 3. Change Order-DEDUCTION $ 4. Revised Contract Amount $ 5. Total Completed and Stored to Date $2 c 6_ Less Retainage % $ 7. Total Earned Less Retainage $_ 8. Less Amount Paid Previously $ 9. AMOUNT DUE THIS CURRENT REQUEST $ 2g( vUJ The undersigned Contractor certifies that to the best of his knowledge, information and belief, the work covered by this application for payment has been completed in accordance with the contract documents, that all amounts have been paid by him for work for which previous payments were received from the City and that current payment shown herein is now due. ,� Contractor: 5LA-chl DvU 6 'f-y' "`Y By: Recommended for Payment By: ATTACH ITEMIZED INVOICE Title: Date: SWEDEBRO INVOICE 1409 159th Ave. NE DATE: November 28, 2022 Ham Lake, MN 55304 INVOICE# 2022310 Phone: 763-434-9237 Fax: 763-434-8999 Bill To: City of Apple Valley 7100 147th Street West Apple Valley, MN 55124 DESCRIPTION AMOUNT Police Facilty Concrete Flooring Office Floors 28,000.00 TOTAL $ 28,000.00 Make all checks payable to SwedeBro, Inc. Late Fee will be assessed if payment is not received in 30 days After 30 day interest charges acrue at 1.5%per month (18%per year). After 60 days all balances are sent to a collections. A Mechanic's Lien may be filed on property after 60 days. Thank You for Your Business! • ITEM: 4.T. ..... :�. Apple COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 8, 2022 Valley SECTION: Consent Agenda Description: Approve Personnel Report Staff Contact: Department/ Division: Melissa Haas, Human Resources Manager Human Resources Division ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the personnel report. SUMMARY: The employment actions attached to this memo are recommended for City Council approval. BACKGROUND: The City Council's approval of the Personnel Report includes the ratification of the City Administrator's actions in carrying out the terms and conditions of the employment of the City personnel. BUDGET IMPACT: Budgeted positions. ATTACHMENTS: Personnel Report PERSONNEL REPORT City of Apple Valley December 8,2022 Human Resources EMPLOYMENT ACTIONS The following employment actions are recommended for City Council approval: First Last Base Pay Pay Pay Date Name Name Action Position Status Dept. Rate Type Scale (on or about) Full-Time, Timothy Benetti Hire Community Development Director Regular 1100 $ 150,000.00 Annual 240E 1/9/2023 Casual, Joseph Driessen Hire Sales Clerk Variable Hour 5090 $ 15.50 Hourly L-1 11/28/2022 Casual, Stacy Holmes Rehire Facility Attendant Seasonal 5205 $ 11.85 Hourly C-01 12/3/2022 Casual, Zachary Miller Rehire Facility Attendant Seasonal 1800 $ 12.75 Hourly C-01 12/15/2022 Casual, Gary Reichow Rehire Facility Attendant Seasonal 1800 $ 12.75 Hourly C-01 12/15/2022 Casual, Kegan Roloff Hire Facility Attendant Seasonal 1800 $ 11.25 Hourly C-01 12/15/2022 Full-Time, Sean Zauhar Hire Police Lieutenant Regular 1200 $ 133,600.00 Annual 220E 12/19/2022 The Council's approval of the Personnel Report includes the ratification of the City Administrator's actions in carrying out the terms and conditions of the employment of the City personnel. Page 1 of 1 • ITEM: 4.U. ..... :�. Apple COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 8, 2022 Valley SECTION: Consent Agenda Description: Approve Claims and Bills Staff Contact: Department/ Division: Ron Hedberg, Finance Director Finance Department ACTION REQUESTED: Approve claims and bills. SUMMARY: Attached for City Council review and approval are check registers for recent claims and bills. BACKGROUND: N/A BUDGET IMPACT: Check registers dated November 16, 2022, and November 22, 2022, in the amounts of $913,033.79, and $742,651.77, respectively. ATTACHMENTS: Claims and Bills Claims and Bills R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/16/2022 9:59:09 Council Check Register by GL Page- 1 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 10/31/2022-- 11/18/2022 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 27720 11/18/2022 100101 ACE HARDWARE 2.95- DISCOUNT 430203 101310962521 1340.6333 GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS FIRE BLDG&GROUNDS MNTC 55.03 SOFTENER SALT,MISC 430203 101310962521 1340,6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE BLDG&GROUNDS MNTC .29- DISCOUNT 429891 101340961841 5205.6333 GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS ARENA 1 MANAGEMENT 2.99 AVSA CASH DRAWER KEY 429891 101340961841 5205.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA 1 MANAGEMENT 2.19- DISCOUNT 430204 101340961961 5210.6333 GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS ARENA 1 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 21.99 AVSA CLOG BUSTER 430204 101340961961 5210.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA 1 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 5.79- DISCOUNT 430202 101340962261 5210.6333 GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS ARENA 1 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 57.97 IA1 HOSE,HOSE HANGER,MISC 430202 101340962261 5210.6211 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT ARENA 1 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 6.42- CH DISCOUNT 429890 101390961501 1610.6333 GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS STREET/BOULEVARD REPAIR&MN 64.22 153RD/CEDAR SIGN REPAIR 429890 101390961501 1610.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET/BOULEVARD REPAIR&MN 184.56 27721 11/18/2022 147453 ADAM'S PEST CONTROL INC 80.06 PEST CONTROL @ WELL#3 429709 3551242 5320.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/F 80.06 27722 11/18/2022 148565 ADVANCED IMAGING SOLUTIONS(C 198.40 COPIER MAINTENANCE 429787 INV290316 1500.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT PW MANAGEMENT 198.40 27723 11/18/2022 114540 ALEX AIR APPARATUS INC 971.44 COMPRESSOR SERVICE AND TEST 429720 6068 1350.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT FIRE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 766.45 COMPRESSOR SERVICE AND TEST 429719 6069 1340.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT FIRE BLDG&GROUNDS MNTC 766.45 COMPRESSOR SERVICE AND TEST 429721 6070 1340.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT FIRE BLDG&GROUNDS MNTC 2,504.34 27724 11/18/2022 151103 BEST LAWN GUY 70.00 1028 LOWELL GRASS ABATEMENT 429747 12099 1013.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES CODE ENFORCEMENT 70.00 1075 WHITNEY GRASS ABATEMENT 429748 12100 1013,6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES CODE ENFORCEMENT 70.00 8637 135TH ST GRASS ABATEMENT 429749 12101 1013.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES CODE ENFORCEMENT 210.00 27725 11/18/2022 128535 CARTEGRAPH SYSTEMS INC 166.67 ADDITIONAL CARTEGRAPH LICENSES 429851 INV2085 5305.6280 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS WATER MGMT/REPORT/DATA ENTR' 166.67 ADDITIONAL CARTEGRAPH LICENSES 429851 INV2085 5365.6280 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS SEWER MGMT/REPORTS/DATA ENT 166,67 ADDITIONAL CARTEGRAPH LICENSES 429851 INV2085 5505,6280 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS STORM DRAIN MNTC/RPR/SUMPS 500.01 27726 11/18/2022 153848 CLESENS 283.49 IRRIGATION PARTS 429858 63200 2243.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS GOLF IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/16/2022 9:59:09 Council Check Register by GL Page- 2 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 10/31/2022-- 11/18/2022 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 27726 11/18/2022 153848 CLESENS Continued... 168.60 IRRIGATION PARTS 429857 63300 2243.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS GOLF IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE 452.09 27727 11/18/2022 150664 CLUB PROPHET SYSTEMS 225.00 CLUB PROPHET POS F&B 429759 2174NOV22 2270.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GOLF FOOD&BEVERAGE 546.00 CLUB PROPHET POS GOLF 429759 2174NOV22 2260.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GOLF PRO SHOP MERCH SALES 771.00 27728 11/18/2022 100129 DAKOTA AWARDS&ENGRAVING 194.10 FIRE PREVENTION POSTER CONTEST 429725 25278 1320.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE FIRE PREVENTION 194.10 27729 11/18/2022 100128 DAKOTA ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION 45.19 COBBLESTONE LK PKY LIGHTS OCT 429885 2000010293470CT 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 22 148.54 QUARRY POINT TOWER OCT 429882 2000010368880CT 5320.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/F 22 200.16 VALLEYWOOD MAINT BLDG OCT 429884 2000013489600CT 2230.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC GOLF SHOP BUILDING MAINTENANI 22 119.64 VALLEYWOOD RESERVOIR OCT 429887 2000022442420CT 5320.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/F 22 180.33 15298 153RD ST LIGHTS OCT 429886 2000031555790CT 5805,6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 22 59.89 15850 DRAWSTONE TRL LIGHTS 429889 2000034728420CT 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 22 54,01 15750 DIAMOND WAY LIGHTS OCT 429888 2000034728590CT 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 22 34.58 15745 COBBLESTONE LK PKWY LIGH 430166 2000034728670CT 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 22 21.14 158TH/DIAMOND PATH MOONLIGHT 0 430167 2000034728750CT 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 22 67.32 COBBLESTONE LK PKY LIGHTS OCT 430168 2000035719570CT 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 22 2,415.27 VALLEYWOOD CLUBHOUSE OCT 430169 2000049852060CT 2215.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC GOLF CLUBHOUSE BUILDING 22 27.16 COBBLESTONE N 2ND ADDITION OCT 430170 2000056634630CT 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 22 34.57 COBBLESTONE N 2ND ADDITION OCT 430171 2000056634710CT 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 22 5.00 CD SIREN-PILOT KNOB#394930-2 429804 200010000089NOV 1290.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC CIVIL DEFENSE MANAGEMENT R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/16/2022 9:59:09 Council Check Register by GL Page• 3 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 10/31/2022-- 11/18/2022 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 27729 11/18/2022 100128 DAKOTA ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Continued... 22 5.10 CD SIREN-CHAPARRAL#2010833 429804 200010000089NOV 1290.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC CIVIL DEFENSE MANAGEMENT 22 5.10 CD SIREN-WILDWOOD#2010825 429804 200010000089NOV 1290.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC CIVIL DEFENSE MANAGEMENT 22 5.10 CD SIREN-CED KNOLLS#2010817 429804 200010000089NOV 1290.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC CIVIL DEFENSE MANAGEMENT 22 5.10 CD SIREN-GALAXIE&42#2010809 429804 200010000089NOV 1290.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC CIVIL DEFENSE MANAGEMENT 22 5.10 CD SIREN-DUCHESS#2010791 429804 200010000089NOV 1290.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC CIVIL DEFENSE MANAGEMENT 22 5,10 CD SIREN-DELANEY#2010783 429804 200010000089NOV 1290.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC CIVIL DEFENSE MANAGEMENT 22 5.10 CD SIREN-HUNTINGTON#2010775 429804 200010000089NOV 1290.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC CIVIL DEFENSE MANAGEMENT 22 5,10 CD SIREN-CMF#2010767 429804 200010000089NOV 1290.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC CIVIL DEFENSE MANAGEMENT 22 17.31 FOUNDER PK LT#366449-7 429804 200010000089NOV 1740.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC PARK SIDEWALK/PATH MAINTENAN, 22 17.31 HAGEMEISTER TENNIS LTS#1804087 429804 200010000089NOV 1745.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC PARK CRT/GAME AREA MAINTENAN 22 19.60 HUNTINGTON PK SHLTR#2014926 429804 200010000089NOV 1730.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE 22 19.73 LEGION FLD PRESS BX#310081-5 429804 200010000089NOV 1730.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE 22 20.76 ALIMAGNET PK RESTRM#144117-9 429804 200010000089NOV 1730.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE 22 25.48 SALT BLDG#310219-1 429804 200010000089NOV 1540.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC CMF BUILDINGS&GROUNDS MNTC 22 25.92 PW RADIO EQUIP#215383-1 429804 200010000089NOV 1540.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC CMF BUILDINGS&GROUNDS MNTC 22 28.56 PK-BELMT PD AER/FOUNT#325093-3 429804 200010000089NOV 1720.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE 22 29.71 GALAXIE PK WMHSE#481583-3 429804 200010000089NOV 1730.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE 22 30.60 AV EAST PK WMHSE#2148484 429804 200010000089NOV 1730.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE 22 31,50 KELLEY PD PK/SPKLR#405066-2 429804 200010000089NOV 1720.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE 22 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/16/2022 9:59:09 Council Check Register by GL Page- 4 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 10/31/2022-- 11/18/2022 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unil 27729 11/18/2022 100128 DAKOTA ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Continued... 39.06 EASTVIEW PRESS BOX#2079408 429804 200010000089NOV 1730.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE 22 50,56 HAGEMEISTER PK SHLTR#151256-5 429804 200010000089NOV 1730.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE 22 55.08 DELANEY PK SHLTR#151247-4 429804 200010000089NOV 1730.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE 22 68.85 FARQ PK RESTROOMS#1617653 429804 200010000089NOV 1730.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE 22 75.54 VALLEY MID PK SHLTR#1247824 429804 200010000089NOV 1730.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE 22 111.03 COBBLESTONE PAVILLION 429804 200010000089NOV 1730.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE 22 117.58 SCOTT TENNIS LTS#1804079 429804 200010000089NOV 1745.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC PARK CRT/GAME AREA MAINTENAN 22 172.86 AVFAC EXPANSION#443065-8 429804 200010000089NOV 1940.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC AQUATIC SWIM CENTER 22 189.22 AQUATIC CENTER#273061-2 429804 200010000089NOV 1940.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC AQUATIC SWIM CENTER 22 208.53 CMF STORAGE#2009652 429804 200010000089NOV 1540.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC CMF BUILDINGS&GROUNDS MNTC 22 233.34 FIRE STATION#3#146046-8 429804 200010000089NOV 1340.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC FIRE BLDG&GROUNDS MNTC 22 238.20 FIRE STATION#2#145450-3 429804 200010000089NOV 1340.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC FIRE BLDG&GROUNDS MNTC 22 259.71 REDWOOD/POOL#108328-6 429804 200010000089NOV 1730.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE 22 347.80 TEEN CENTER#268335-7 429804 200010000089NOV 1730.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE 22 440.40 PARK HS#4 FIELDS#224529-8 429804 200010000089NOV 1780.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC PARK HIGH SCHOOL#4 FIELDS 22 743.02 FIRE STATION#1#111343-0 429804 200010000089NOV 1340.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC FIRE BLDG&GROUNDS MNTC 22 1,007.48 CENTRAL MAINT FAC#511870-8 429804 200010000089NOV 1540.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC CMF BUILDINGS&GROUNDS MNTC 22 1,144.13 HAYES COMM&SR CTR#451229-9 429804 200010000089NOV 1920.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC SENIOR CENTER 22 1,474.64 PARK PATHWAY LTS#2053296 429804 200010000089NOV 1740.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC PARK SIDEWALK/PATH MAINTENAN' 22 1,478.25 AV COMM CTR#1883305 429804 200010000089NOV 1900.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC AV COMMUNITY CENTER R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/16/2022 9:59:09 Council Check Register by GL Page- 5 i Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 10/31/2022-- 11/18/2022 Check# Dale Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 27729 11/18/2022 100128 DAKOTA ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Continued,,. 22 1,498.39 EASTVIEW-HIGHLAND#1889047 429804 200010000089NOV 1715-6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC PARK ATHLETIC FIELD MAINTENAN( 22 1,898.14 QUARRY PTATHLCPLX#456933-1 429804 200010000089NOV 1715.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC PARK ATHLETIC FIELD MAINTENAN( 22 3,929.54 MUNICIPAL CENTER#288247-0 429804 200010000089NOV 1060,6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC MUNICIPAL BLDG&GROUNDS MN1 22 1,189.89 OLD CITY HALL#517541-9 429804 200010000089NOV 2092.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC EDUCATION BUILDING FUND 22 71.82 CENTRAL VILLAGE P-LOT 429804 200010000089NOV 2097.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC CENTRAL VILLAGE PARKING LOT 22 624.33 LIQUOR STORE 2#138678-8 429804 200010000089NOV 5065.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC LIQUOR#2 OPERATIONS 22 1,286.27 LIQUOR STORE 1#145003-0 429804 200010000089NOV 5025.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC LIQUOR#1 OPERATIONS 22 1,438.66 LIQUOR STORE 3#444140-8 429804 200010000089NOV 5095.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC LIQUOR#3 OPERATIONS 22 862,44 VLLYWD GOLF SPRINK-134893-7 429804 200010000089NOV 5150.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC GOLF COURSE MAINTENANCE 22 4,686.81 ICE ARENA#1#136723-4 429804 200010000089NOV 5210.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC ARENA 1 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 22 4,907.71 HAYES PK ICE ARENA#222230-5 429804 200010000089NOV 5265.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC ARENA 2 BLDG MAINTENANCE-HAY 22 16.28 PUMPHOUSE 15#2121093 429804 200010000089NOV 5320.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/F 22 19.14 PALOMINO RESERVOIR#103546-8 429804 200010000089NOV 5320.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/F 22 19.48 HERALD WY PRESS STN#103686-2 429804 200010000089NOV 5320.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/F 22 30.22 PUMPHOUSE#1#106890-7 429804 200010000089NOV 5320,6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/F 22 45.45 LS 7 HERITAGE HILLS#144109-6 429804 200010000089NOV 5380,6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC SEWER LIFT STN REPAIR&MNTC 22 48.90 LS 11-HIGHLAND PT CT#2021699 429804 200010000089NOV 5380.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC SEWER LIFT STN REPAIR&MNTC 22 49.02 PUMPHOUSE#5#135486-9 429804 200010000089NOV 5320.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/F 22 49.66 LS 10 NORDIC WOODS#1830835 429804 200010000089NOV 5380,6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC SEWER LIFT STN REPAIR&MNTC 22 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/16/2022 9:59:09 Council Check Register by GL Page- 6 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 10/31/2022-- 11/18/2022 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 27729 11/18/2022 100128 DAKOTA ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Continued... 52.98 PUMPHOUSE#2#108018-3 429804 200010000089NOV 5320.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/F 22 65,40 PUMPHOUSE 08#1468404 429804 200010000089NOV 5320.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/F 22 77.67 PUMPHOUSE#3#106099-5 429804 200010000089NOV 5320.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/F 22 89.95 PUMPHOUSE#4#121151-5 429804 200010000089NOV 5320.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/F 22 102.22 PUMPHOUSE 14#2008852 429804 200010000089NOV 5320.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/F 22 108.50 LIFT STN 4 PH LKSHR#1030667 429804 200010000089NOV 5380.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC SEWER LIFT STN REPAIR&MNTC 22 115.80 WTRTWR RESERV-LONGRDG#144881- 429804 200010000089NOV 5320.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/F 22 130.89 LS 9 4771 DOMINICA WY#525977- 429804 200010000089NOV 5380.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC SEWER LIFT STN REPAIR&MNTC 22 177.75 LIFT#5#580685-6 429804 200010000089NOV 5380.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC SEWER LIFT STN REPAIR&MNTC 22 197.31 PUMPHOUSE 13#2023265 429804 200010000089NOV 5320.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/F 22 272.10 LFT STN3 133 CHAPARRAL 546943 429804 200010000089NOV 5380.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC SEWER LIFT STN REPAIR&MNTC 22 299.80 AV BOOSTER-NORDIC#138075-7 429804 200010000089NOV 5320.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/F 22 424.90 PUMPHOUSE 17#307438-2 429804 200010000089NOV 5320.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/F 22 716.66 PUMPHOUSE#10#155867-5 429804 200010000089NOV 5320.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/F 22 789.88 PUMPHOUSE 18#1078310 429804 200010000089NOV 5320.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/F 22 857.08 LIFT STN 1 ELLICE#131715-5 429804 200010000089NOV 5380.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC SEWER LIFT STN REPAIR&MNTC 22 1,413.94 PUMPHOUSE 09#1526292 429804 200010000089NOV 5320.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/F 22 2,504.91 PUMPHOUSE#11#174395-4 429804 200010000089NOV 5320.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/F 22 2,509.46 PUMPHOUSE#7#126394-6 429804 200010000089NOV 5320.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/F 22 2,960.91 PUMPHOUSE 20#484299 429804 200010000089NOV 5320.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/F R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/16/2022 9:59:09 Council Check Register by GL Page- 7 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 10/31/2022-- 11/18/2022 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 27729 11/18/2022 100128 DAKOTA ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Continued... 22 2,996.76 PUMPHOUSE 12#2023273 429804 200010000089NOV 5320.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/F 22 4,822_89 PUMPHOUSE 19#415728-5 429804 200010000089NOV 5320.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/F 22 14,239.20 WTR TREATMENT PLANT#511870-8 429804 200010000089NOV 5325.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC WATER TREATMENT FCLTY MNTC/R 22 16.28 LS STM SWR HGHWD#1586924 429804 200010000089NOV 5505.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC STORM DRAIN MNTC/RPR/SUMPS 22 21.01 LS STM SWR-BELMONT PK#2011021 429804 200010000089NOV 5505.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC STORM DRAIN MNTC/RPR/SUMPS 22 27,92 LS STM SWR BRIAR OAKS#1827781 429804 2000100000B9NOV 5505.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC STORM DRAIN MNTC/RPR/SUMPS 22 33.16 LS-WHEATON PONDS#443438-7 429804 200010000089NOV 5505.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC STORM DRAIN MNTC/RPR/SUMPS 22 63,72 LS STM SWR PENNOCK SHR#135489 429804 200010000089NOV 5505.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC STORM DRAIN MNTC/RPR/SUMPS 22 96.77 LS STM SWR ALIMAGNET#144134-4 429804 200010000089NOV 5505.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC STORM DRAIN MNTC/RPR/SUMPS 22 123,44 LS STM SWR-HANNOVER#19860009 429804 200010000089NOV 5505.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC STORM DRAIN MNTC/RPR/SUMPS 22 15802 LS STN COBB LK#306511-7 429804 200010000089NOV 5505_6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC STORM DRAIN MNTC/RPR/SUMPS 22 179.25 LS STM SWR FARQUAR#137184-8 429804 200010000089NOV 5505.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC STORM DRAIN MNTC/RPR/SUMPS 22 716;04 LS 2 7698 128TH ST W#490873-7 429804 200010000089NOV 5505.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC STORM DRAIN MNTC/RPR/SUMPS 22 51.13 CEMETERY LTS#339637-1 429804 200010000089NOV 5605.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC CEMETERY 22 52.73 CEMETERY LTS FLAGPOLE#318998-2 429804 200010000089NOV 5605.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC CEMETERY 22 17.44 964 GARDENVIEW DR SLSIGN 429804 200010000089NOV 5805,6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 22 25.93 UTIL RADIO EQUIP#215383-1 429804 200010000089NOV 5805.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 22 30.46 GREENWAY TUNNEL#563183-3 429804 200010000089NOV 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 22 39.69 SIGNAL-GARRETT&150TH#1802081 429804 200010000089NOV 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 22 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/16/2022 9:59:09 Council Check Register by GL Page- 8 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 10/31/2022-- 11/18/2022 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 27729 11/18/2022 100128 DAKOTA ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Continued... 40.71 SIGNAL 153RD&CUB#2013084 429804 200010000089NOV 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 22 41.74 SIGNAL-147TH/PENNOCK#103448-7 429804 200010000089NOV 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 22 41.74 SIGNAL-GALAXIE&140TH#2053858 429804 200010000089NOV 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 22 41.74 TUNNEL STREET LT#279581-3 429804 200010000089NOV 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 22 41.98 SIGNAL-140TH/FLAGSTAFF#2750370 429804 200010000089NOV 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 22 44.03 SIGNAL-149TH/PENNOCK#103448-7 429804 200010000089NOV 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 22 44.42 SIGNAL-GALAXIE&147TH#1022698 429804 200010000089NOV 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 22 45.95 SIGNAL 42&PENNOCK#1033836 429804 200010000089NOV 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 22 45.95 SIGNAL-140TH/PENNOCK#303778-5 429804 200010000089NOV 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 22 47.61 SIGNAL-CEDAR& 145TH#2047702 429804 200010000089NOV 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 22 48.26 SIGNAL-GALAXIE&153RD#3128204 429804 200010000089NOV 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 22 49.14 SIGNAL-140TH/JOHNNY CK#2750412 429804 200010000089NOV 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 22 51.70 SIGNAL CEDAR&147TH#1033901 429804 200010000089NOV 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 22 52.35 SIGNAL CEDAR&140TH#1577386 429804 200010000089NOV 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 22 53.24 SIGNAL GALAXIE&150TH#1821115 429804 200010000089NOV 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 22 55.29 GASLIGHT STREET LT#267358-0 429804 200010000089NOV 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 22 60.16 SIGNAL 42&GARDENVW#124646-1 429804 200010000089NOV 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 22 89.43 SIGNAL-GALAXIE&38#2146678 429804 200010000089NOV 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 22 119.88 CO RD 42/CEDAR LTS#501516-9 429804 200010000089NOV 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 22 124.75 CEDAR/147TH LTS#501520-1 429804 200010000089NOV 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/16/2022 9:59:09 Council Check Register by GL Page- 9 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 10/31/2022-- 11/18/2022 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 27729 11/18/2022 100128 DAKOTA ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION Continued... 22 161.20 CEDAR/145TH LTS#501526-8 429804 200010000089NOV 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 22 162.10 147TH ST W LTS#498760-8 429804 200010000089NOV 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 22 180.39 CEDAR/140TH LTS#501536-7 429804 200010000089NOV 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 22 183.71 CEDAR&153RD LT#487980-5 429804 200010000089NOV 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 22 207.38 CEDAR&157RD LT#487985-4 429804 200010000089NOV 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 22 36,041.02 UTILITY STREET LTS#1109149 429804 200010000089NOV 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 22 18.44 12119 GANTRY LN POND NOV 430172 200010036848NOV 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 22 36.65 HAWK SIGNAL PED CROSSING NOV 430199 200010066613NOV 5805.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 22 24.05 PILOT KNOB/155TH ST SPKLR NOV 430198 200010066957NOV 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 22 75.22 PILOT KNOB/155TH ST SIGNAL NOV 430200 200010066959NOV 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 22 110,658.09 27730 11/18/2022 101365 ECM PUBLISHERS INC 986.00 LEGAL AD-POLLING PLACES 429742 916797 1015,6239 PRINTING CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS 165.75 2023 LIQUOR RENEWALS 429878 918978 1015.6239 PRINTING CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS 1,151.75 27731 11/18/2022 100157 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS CO 105.60 HYDRAULIC FITTINGS 429862 18106813 1630.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS STREET EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCI 121.68 BROKEN SEAT PULLER WRENCH 429716 75452790 5330.6211 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT WTR MAIN/HYDRANT/CURB STOP N 227.28 27732 11/18/2022 120313 FASTENAL COMPANY 105.98- TOOL RETURN 427047 MNLAK162867 1610.6211 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT STREET/BOULEVARD REPAIR&MN' 54.13- HYDRANT BOLTS 427525 MNLAK163590 5330.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS WTR MAIN/HYDRANT/CURB STOP M 461,33 SS ANCHORS FOR FILTER CELL C 429733 MNLAK194409 5325.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS WATER TREATMENT FCLTY MNTC/R 2.09- IA1 SALES TAX ADJUST 429825 MNTC1274755 5210.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA 1 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 2.09 IA1 SALES TAX ADJUST 429825 MNTC1274755 5200.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT ARENA FUND BALANCE SHEET 31.47 AVSA WALKWAY NUTS AND BOLTS 429825 MNTC1274755 5210.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA 1 BUILDING MAINTENANCE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/16/2022 9:59:09 Council Check Register by GL Page- 10 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 10/31/2022-- 11/18/2022 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 27732 11/18/2022 120313 FASTENAL COMPANY Continued... 332.69 27733 11/18/2022 100548 FORKLIFTS OF MINNESOTA,INC 157.11 AVSA FORKLIFT REPAIR 429764 1S9380610 5215,6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT ARENA 1 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANC 157.11 27734 11/18/2022 100209 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL 279.45 GSOC LOCATING OCT 429849 2100186 5365.6399 OTHER CHARGES SEWER MGMT/REPORTS/DATA ENT - 279,45 GSOC LOCATING OCT 429849 2100186 5335.6399 OTHER CHARGES WATER FINAL/SERVICE ON OFF/LOc 279.45 GSOC LOCATING OCT 429849 2100186 5505.6399 OTHER CHARGES STORM DRAIN MNTCIRPR/SUMPS 35.10 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 429820 2100187 5805.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 873.45 27735 11/18/2022 100217 GRAINGER,INC. 21.79 DECANT FITTING 401 429711 9489909847 5390.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS SWR EQUIP/VEHICLE MISC MNTC/R 59.81 DECANT FITTINGS 401 429712 9490014199 5390.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS SWR EQUIP/VEHICLE MISC MNTC/R 81.60 27736 11/18/2022 103314 INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS 4.49 STAPLE PULLERS,PENS 429717 IN3985378 1900.6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES AV COMMUNITY CENTER 138.72 CLEANING SUPPLIES. 429717 IN3985378 1900.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES AV COMMUNITY CENTER 30.89 CLEANING SOLUTION. 429713 IN3986578 1900.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES AV COMMUNITY CENTER 110.08 CLEANING SUPPLIES, 430173 IN3994956 1830.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REC BUILDING&ATTENDANTS 284.18 27737 11/18/2022 101796 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEM OF M 237.26 BATTERIES#217 429869 220068004 1765.6216 VEHICLES-TIRES/BATTERIES PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 131.55 BATTERY#409 429869 220068004 5390.6216 VEHICLES-TIRES/BATTERIES SWR EQUIPNEHICLE MISC MNTC/R 368.81 27738 11/18/2022 100279 LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES 455.00 SERGEANT(#243)UNION DUES 429541 110922826263 9000.2120 ACCRUED BENEFIT LIABILITY PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET 2,600.00 POLICE(#71)UNION DUES 429541 110922826263 9000.2120 ACCRUED BENEFIT LIABILITY PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET 3,055.00 27739 11/18/2022 154223 LIGHTNING DISPOSAL,INC. 5,801.28 CLEAN-UP DAY DISPOSAL FEES 429785 360173 2042.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVSOLID WASTE GRANT 1,184.32 HAYES LANDSCAPING REMOVAL 429751 360917 5265.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVARENA 2 BLDG MAINTENANCE-HAY 508.90 COMPOST DUMPSTER 429842 361453 1720.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVPARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE 7,494.50 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/16/2022 9:59:09 Council Check Register by GL Page- 11 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 10/31/2022-- 11/18/2022 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 27739 11/18/2022 154223 LIGHTNING DISPOSAL,INC. Continued... 27740 11/18/2022 100293 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT 117.25 SWEEPER PARTS 429722 P45566 5505.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS STORM DRAIN MNTC/RPR/SUMPS 299.48 SWEEPER PARTS 429700 P45644 5505.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS STORM DRAIN MNTC/RPR/SUMPS 416.73 27741 11/18/2022 100299 MASTER ELECTRIC CO 1,928.54 ATHLETIC BULBS REPLACEMENTS 429735 SD42667 1715.6269 REPAIRS-OTHER PARK ATHLETIC FIELD MAINTENAN( 2,161.18 EDUBLDG-FIRE EXIT LIGHT REP 429744 SD42668 2092.6266 REPAIRS-BUILDING EDUCATION BUILDING FUND 317.75 HAYES ELECTRIC LOCATE LANDSCAP 429826 SD42669 5265.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES ARENA 2 BLDG MAINTENANCE-HAY 591.13 RPR LIGHT AT EMPLOYEE ENT WALK 429732 SD42670 1060.6266 REPAIRS-BUILDING MUNICIPAL BLDG&GROUNDS MN1 1,668.45 AVSA ELECTRICAL REPAIRS 429840 SD42671 5210_6266 REPAIRS-BUILDING ARENA 1 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 933.62 TENNIS LIGHT REPAIRS HAGEMEIST 429737 SD42672 1745.6269 REPAIRS-OTHER PARK CRT/GAME AREA MAINTENAN 894.28 QP TUNNEL LIGHT REPAIR 429736 SD42673 1720.6269 REPAIRS-OTHER PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE 440.00 IRRIGATION LOCATES JCRP-EAST 429738 SD42674 1715.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES PARK ATHLETIC FIELD MAINTENAN( 577,75 ELECTRICAL FIX AT TENNIS COURT 429845 SD42676 2027.6810 2017109R CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS ROAD ESCROW 199.38 WALL PACK APPLE VALLEY EAST 429730 SD42677 1730.6269 REPAIRS-OTHER PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE 9,712.08 27742 11/18/2022 100849 METRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS ASS 1,598.00 VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL 10/18-11/1 429854 1712 1860.6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES REC VOLLEYBALL 1,598.00 27743 11/18/2022 145996 MINNESOTA NATIVE LANDSCAPES 250.00 HOLDING POND MAINTENANCE 429830 36984 5095.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES LIQUOR#3 OPERATIONS 250.00 27744 11/18/2022 100348 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO 277.88 211 BELT 429727 136849800 1765.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 557.01 HAYES IRRIGATION 429841 136906700 1715.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS PARK ATHLETIC FIELD MAINTENAN( 834.89 27745 11/18/2022 141813 MYLES MILLER DRAFT LINE CLEANING SERVICE 75 00 BEER LINE CLEANING 429855 1706 2270.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GOLF FOOD&BEVERAGE 75 00 27746 11/18/2022 121340 NATIONAL GOLF FOUNDATION 295.00 GOLF MEMBERSHIP DUES 429816 20221031 2200.1560 PREPAID EXPENSES VALLEYWOOD GOLF 295.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/16/2022 9:59:09 Council Check Register by GL Page- 12 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 10/31/2022-- 11/18/2022 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 27747 11/18/2022 154297 NITTI SANITATION Continued... 573.96 CH TRASH NOV 430175 30182001 NOV22 1060.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVMUNICIPAL BLDG&GROUNDS MN1 1,250.50 CMF TRASH NOV 430174 30182002NOV22 1540.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVCMF BUILDINGS&GROUNDS MNTC 170.33 FIRE STA 1 TRASH NOV 430176 30182003NOV22 1340,6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVFIRE BLDG&GROUNDS MNTC 45.81 FIRE STA 2 TRASH NOV 430185 30182004NOV22 1340.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVFIRE BLDG&GROUNDS MNTC 47.64 FIRE STA 3 TRASH NOV 430187 30182005NOV22 1340,6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVFIRE BLDG&GROUNDS MNTC 191.97 LIQ 1 TRASH NOV 430186 30182006NOV22 5025.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVLIQUOR#1 OPERATIONS 101.64 LIQ 2 TRASH NOV 430190 30182007NOV22 5065.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVLIQUOR#2 OPERATIONS 47.64 LIQ 3 TRASH NOV 430191 30182008NOV22 5095.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVLIQUOR#3 OPERATIONS 170.41 OLD CH TRASH NOV 430189 30182009NOV22 2092.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE EDUCATION BUILDING FUND 246.65 HCSC TRASH NOV 430188 30182010NOV22 1920.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVSENIOR CENTER 365.98 AVCC TRASH NOV 430188 30182010NOV22 1900.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVAV COMMUNITY CENTER 182.99 IA2 TRASH NOV 430188 30182010NOV22 5265.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVARENA 2 BLDG MAINTENANCE-HAY 221.71 REDWOOD TRASH NOV 430194 30182011 NOV22 1730.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVPARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE 100.09 JC ACTIVITY CTR TRASH NOV 430195 30182013NOV22 1730.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVPARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE 228.38 JCR PK TRASH NOV 430192 30182014NOV22 1730.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVPARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE 112.41 QP TRASH NOV 430193 30182015NOV22 1945.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVQUARRY POINTE 112.23 VM PK TRASH NOV 430196 30182016NOV22 1730.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVPARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE 717.97 GOLF TRASH NOV 430197 30182017NOV22 2230.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVGOLF SHOP BUILDING MAINTENANI 4,888.31 27748 11/18/2022 146279 NORDIC MECHANICAL SERVICES,I 260,00 HVAC CHECK-GALAXIE 429828 67094 1730.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE 260.00 27749 11/18/2022 155871 NORTH AMERICAN SAFETY INC 40.98 RUBBER CHAINSAW BOOTS 429704 INV69910 5375.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES SEWER MAINTENANCE AND REPAIF 40.98 RUBBER CHAINSAW BOOTS 429704 INV69910 5330.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES WTR MAIN/HYDRANT/CURB STOP IV 40.99 RUBBER CHAINSAW BOOTS 429704 INV69910 5505.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES STORM DRAIN MNTC/RPR/SUMPS 122.95 27750 11/18/2022 100385 PLUNKETT'S PEST CONTROL INC 55.70 PEST CONTROL SERVICE 429817 7792037 2215.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GOLF CLUBHOUSE BUILDING 55.70 27751 11/18/2022 150718 PRO-TEC DESIGN,INC 28,243,00 CAMERAS QUARRY POINT TOWER 429850 107271 5320.6735 CAPITAL OUTLAY-OTHER IMPROVEME WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/F 28,243.00 27752 11/18/2022 100393 PUMP AND METER SERVICE INC 1,900.00- CRDIT BACK THEIR MISTAKE 424854 2210942CMJ 1530,6266 REPAIRS-BUILDING FLEET&BUILDINGS-CMF R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/16/2022 9:59:09 Council Check Register by GL Page- 13 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 10/31/2022-- 11/18/2022 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 27752 11/18/2022 100393 PUMP AND METER SERVICE INC Continued... 1,900.00 SHOP HOIST SETUP WRONGLY INVOI 424991 2210942J 1530,6266 REPAIRS-BUILDING FLEET&BUILDINGS-CMF 81.77 FUEL KEYS 429872 364981 1530.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS FLEET&BUILDINGS-CMF 81,77 27753 11/18/2022 100395 R&R SPECIALTIES OF WISCONSIN INC 93.20 AVSA OLY BLADE SHARPENING 430180 771501N 5215.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT ARENA 1 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANC 93.20 27754 11/18/2022 122110 REINDERS INC 7,054.78 LELY TOW SPREADER 429781 309159300 2235.6740 CAPITAL OUTLAY-MACH/EQ/OTHER GOLF COURSE MAINTENANCE 7,054.78 27755 11/18/2022 120496 RENT N'SAVE PORTABLE SERVICES 757.00 JCRPW BIFFS-SEPT 429848 71069 1780.6310 RENTAL EXPENSE PARK HIGH SCHOOL#4 FIELDS 2,594.75 PARK BIFFS-SEPT 429848 71069 1770.6310 RENTAL EXPENSE PARK GENERAL MAINTENANCE 3,351.75 27756 11/18/2022 100600 RIGID HITCH INC 113,94 WHEEL CHOCKS#373T 429871 1928731943 1630.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS STREET EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCI 113.94 27757 11/18/2022 144815 RIHM KENWORTH 302.32 FILTERS KENWORTH TRUCKS 429860 2127864A 1630.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS STREET EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCI 234.04 WATER PUMP#344 429861 2128589A 1630.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS STREET EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCI 62.50- EGR CORE RETURN#312 428345 CM2125975A 1630.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS STREET EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCI 473.86 27758 11/18/2022 152480 RMB ENVIRONMENTAL LAB 156.82 WATER QUALITY LAB SAMPLE 429728 B007056 5505.6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES STORM DRAIN MNTC/RPR/SUMPS 156.82 27759 11/18/2022 119875 SOUTH METRO RENTAL 119.81 SMALL EQUIP RPR 429814 125828 1630,6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT STREET EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCI 119.81 27760 11/18/2022 100524 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE AND SPIRITS OF MN 1,341.24 LIQ#2 00050756 430110 2274668 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 52.00 LIQ#2 00050756 430111 2274669 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 2,303.56 LIQ#3 00050756 430119 2274707 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 1,498.00 WINE#1 00050756 430135 2275541 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/16/2022 9:59:09 Council Check Register by GL Page- 14 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 10/31/2022-- 11/18/2022 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 27760 11/18/2022 100524 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE AND SPIRITS OF MN Continued... 88.00 WINE#1 00050756 430136 2275542 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 64.00 LIQ#1 00050756 430092 2275543 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 3,956.89 LIQ#1 00050756 430093 2275544 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 655.65 LIQ#1 00050756 430094 2275546 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 240.00 WINE#1 00050756 430137 2275547 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 180.00 LIQ#2 00050756 430112 2275548 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 908.00 WINE#2 00050756 430146 2275549 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 128.00- CMWINE#2 00050756 430149 2275549 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 480.00 WINE#2 00050756 430147 2275550 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 785.81 LIQ#2 00050756 430113 2275551 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 151.92 WINE#2 00050756 430148 2275552 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 1,795.42 LIQ#3 00050756 430120 2275564 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 1,656.00 WINE#3 00050756 430154 2275565 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 176.00 LIQ#3 00050756 430121 2275566 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 670.65 LIQ#3 00050756 430122 2275568 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 160.00 WINE#3 00050756 430155 2275569 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 1,486.33 LIQ#3 00050756 430123 2276388 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 619.50 LIQ#1 00050756 430095 2277681 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 810.00 LIQ#1 00050756 430096 2277682 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 512.00 WINE#1 00050756 430138 2277683 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 51.00 LIQ#1 00050756 430097 2277685 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 135.00 LIQ#2 00050756 430114 2277686 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 700.00 WINE#2 00050756 430150 2277688 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 556.00 WINE#2 00050756 430151 2277689 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 318.75 LIQ#3 00050756 430124 2277703 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 540.00 LIQ#3 00050756 430125 2277704 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 444.00 WINE#3 00050756 430156 2277706 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 162.00 LIQ#3 00050756 430126 2277707 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 4,194.82 LIQ#1 00050756 430106 2280374 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 26.00 TAX#1 00050756 430107 2280375 5015.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 496„90 LIQ#1 00050756 430108 2280376 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 298.56 WINE#1 00050756 430141 2280377 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 780.00 WINE#1 00050756 430143 2280378 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 741.35 WINE#1 00050756 430144 2280379 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 2,713.26 LIQ#2 00050756 430117 2280380 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 352_00 WINE#2 00050756 430152 2280381 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 230.90 LIQ#2 00050756 430118 2280382 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 80.00 WINE#2 00050756 430153 2280383 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 2,029.09 LIQ#3 00050756 430131 2280398 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/16/2022 9:59:09 Council Check Register by GL Page- 15 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 10/31/2022-- 11/18/2022 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 27760 11/18/2022 100524 SOUTHERN GLAZERS WINE AND SPIRITS OF MN Continued... 179.95 LIQ#3 00050756 430134 2280399 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 1,020,00 WINE#3 00050756 430159 2280401 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 363.00 LIQ#3 00050756 430132 2280402 5085,6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 1,240.08 WINE#3 00050756 430160 2280403 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 337.45 LIQ#1 00050756 430098 5090129 5015,6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 112,00 WINE#1 00050756 430139 5090130 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 334.50 WINE#1 00050756 430142 5090131 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 355.46 LIQ#1 00050756 430109 5090132 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 9,315.27 LIQ#1 00050756 430099 5090133 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 540.00 LIQ#1 00050756 430100 5090134 5015,6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 1,450.00 WINE#1 00050756 430145 5090135 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 2,419.43 LIQ#1 00050756 430101 5090136 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 1,308.00 LIQ#1 00050756 430102 5090137 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 64.00 LIQ#1 00050756 430103 5090138 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 2,611.25 LIQ#2 00050756 430115 5090139 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 1,308.00 LIQ#2 00050756 430116 5090140 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 3,358.55 LIQ#3 00050756 430133 5090163 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 355.46 LIQ#3 00050756 430127 5090164 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 4,394.74 WINE#3 00050756 430157 5090165 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 116.95 LIQ#3 00050756 430128 5090166 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 160.00 WINE#3 00050756 430161 5090167 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 694.90 LIQ#3 00050756 430129 5090168 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 9.09- CMLIQ#1 00050756 430104 9456807 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 12.66- CMWINE#1 00050756 430140 9456808 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 8.50- CMLIQ#1 00050756 430105 9456809 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 9.09- CMLIQ#3 00050756 430130 9456811 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 13.33- CMWINE#3 00050756 430158 9456812 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 67,298.92 27761 11/18/2022 100457 STREICHERS INC 392.57 2023 AMMO ORDER.38 CAL 429771 11592253 1210.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE FIELD OPERATIONS/PATRO 392.57 27762 11/18/2022 111055 THE RETROFIT COMPANIES INC 341.01 RECYCLED LIGHT BULBS CMF 429702 1182101N 1540.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVCMF BUILDINGS&GROUNDS MNTC 341.01 27763 11/18/2022 100481 TRI-STATE BOBCAT INC 106 51 SKID LOADER FITTINGS 429707 P84296 1765.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 106.51 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/16/2022 9:59:09 Council Check Register by GL Page- 16 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 10/31/2022-- 11/18/2022 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 27763 11/18/2022 100481 TRI-STATE BOBCAT INC Continued... 27764 11/18/2022 100496 VAN PAPER CO 581.09 BAGS#1 00008795 430162 18050 5025.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR#1 OPERATIONS 5.81- DISCT#1 00008795 430163 18050 5025.6333 GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS LIQUOR#1 OPERATIONS 575.28 27765 11/18/2022 126509 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE 767.51 STRESE LN&WELL#13 LEAKS 429734 12668 5330.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES WTR MAIN/HYDRANT/CURB STOP N 767.51 27766 11/18/2022 101003 WINZER CORPORATION 4.75 BULK WIRE 429868 562860 1765.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 4.75 BULK WIRE 429868 562860 1630.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS STREET EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCI 4.75 BULK WIRE 429868 562860 1350.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS FIRE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 4.75 BULK WIRE 429868 562860 1210.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS POLICE FIELD OPERATIONS/PATRO 4.75 BULK WIRE 429868 562860 5345.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS WATER EQUIP/VEHICLE/MISC MNTC 4.76 BULK WIRE 429868 562860 5390.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS SWR EQUIP/VEHICLE MISC MNTC/R 28.51 27767 11/18/2022 100528 ZIEGLER INC 381.04 MOUNTING PINS#352 429867 IN000765757 1630.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS STREET EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCI 381.04 314508 11/14/2022 116409 BERGMAN,JOHN 204.00 NLC SUMMIT-KANSAS CITY BERGMAN 429693 20221114 1005.6278 SUBSISTENCE ALLOWANCE MAYOR/CITY COUNCIL 204.00 314509 11/16/2022 152066 3 GUYS SEWING 20.00 DEWING UNIFORMS 429772 9388 1210.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE POLICE FIELD OPERATIONS/PATRO 30.00 SEWING CLOTHING 429773 9390 1210.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE POLICE FIELD OPERATIONS/PATRO 70.00 DAHLSTROM-UNIFORM UPDATE 429807 9414 1200.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE POLICE MANAGEMENT 120.00 314510 11/16/2022 147492 ACUSHNET COMPANY 29.39- GOLF SALES TAX ADJUST 429723 914405670 2260.6414 GOLF-CLUBS GOLF PRO SHOP MERCH SALES 29.39 GOLF SALES TAX ADJUST 429723 914405670 2200.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT VALLEYWOOD GOLF 441.89 CLUBS FOR RESALE 429723 914405670 2260.6414 GOLF-CLUBS GOLF PRO SHOP MERCH SALES 19.85- GOLF DISCOUNT 429837 914479540 2260,6423 GOLF-CASH DISCOUNT GOLF PRO SHOP MERCH SALES 661.50 CLOTHES FOR RESALE 429837 914479540 2260,6413 GOLF-CAPS/HATS/CLOTHING GOLF PRO SHOP MERCH SALES 1,083.54 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/16/2022 9:59:09 Council Check Register by GL Page- 17 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 10/31/2022-- 11/18/2022 i Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 314510 11/16/2022 147492 ACUSHNET COMPANY Continued... 314511 11/16/2022 100089 ADVANCE AUTO PARTS 92.80 SPIRAL HOSE WRAP 429874 1594417683 1630.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS STREET EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCI 92.80 314512 11/16/2022 144459 ADVANCED IMAGING SOLUTIONS(L 242.00 COPIER LEASE 429694 486215486 1500.6310 RENTAL EXPENSE PW MANAGEMENT 242.00 314513 11/16/2022 153995 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 486.00 URAY ENCODER&DECODER 429833 1131LKRCP611 2012.6211 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT CABLE TV JOINT POWERS 125.52 PRINTER RIBBON 429775 13DTRTDWVHR6 1030.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 28.49 MONITOR CABLES 429802 13RTMWTJK4N3 1030.6211 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 75.95 SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT 429827 141MKNC73NFN 1350.6211 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT FIRE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 121.95 RADIO CHARGER FOR INV VEHICLES 429801 19QK6NNKFY79 1215.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS POLICE DETECTIVE UNIT 42.98 RADIO CHARGER NEW INV CAR 429800 1LFQY4P7WDQY 1215.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS POLICE DETECTIVE UNIT 43.99 SUPERVISORS TRAINING MATERIALS 430178 1 N79F4RVFN4C 1225.6275 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL POLICE TRAINING 39.98 SAFETY SHIELD 429706 1 PGMW4VDD7XK 1765.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 15.36 LIGHT BULBS. 429714 1VQF94C6G3GQ 1900.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES AV COMMUNITY CENTER 60.05 PPE 429714 1 VQF94C6G3GQ 1900.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES AV COMMUNITY CENTER 1.040.27 314514 11/16/2022 100023 ANDERSEN INC,EARL F 1,312.00 ELECTION PRECINCT SIGNS 429743 1312221N 1015.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS 727.55 WELCOME TO AV SIGN UPDATES 429731 1312441N 1680.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES TRAFFIC SIGNS/SIGNALS/MARKERS 2,039.55 314515 11/16/2022 154253 APPLE FORD LINCOLN 396_36 POL VEHICLE LEASE-NOV 429813 20221114 1215.6310 RENTAL EXPENSE POLICE DETECTIVE UNIT 115.48 BRAKES#227 429864 591021 1765,6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 38.08 SIDE MIRROR#906 429863 591746 1210.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS POLICE FIELD OPERATIONS/PATRO 56.80 SIDE MIRROR GLASS#906 429865 5917461 1210.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS POLICE FIELD OPERATIONS/PATRO 70.93 SIDE MIRROR GLASS#906 429866 592187 1210.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS POLICE FIELD OPERATIONS/PATRO 677.65 314516 11/16/2022 100036 APPLE VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMER 150.00 ADVERTISING 429784 25078 2205.6239 PRINTING GOLF MANAGEMENT 150.00 314517 11/16/2022 118892 ASPEN MILLS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/16/2022 9:59:09 Council Check Register by GL Page- 18 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 10/31/2022-- 11/18/2022 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 314517 11/16/2022 118892 ASPEN MILLS Continued... 156.75 SHIRTS,EMBROIDERY,PATCHWORK 429726 303050 1330.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE FIRE OPERATIONS 145,90 APPAREL,EMBROIDERY,PATCHING 429760 303373 1330.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE FIRE OPERATIONS 141.90 APPAREL,EMBROIDERY,PATCHING 429761 303374 1330.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE FIRE OPERATIONS 141.90 APPAREL,EMBROIDERY,PATCHING 429762 303382 1330.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE FIRE OPERATIONS 586.45 314518 11/16/2022 100820 AT&T MOBILITY 1,046.56 POL WIRELESS DATA 430201 287318957082X11 1205.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS POLICE RECORDS UNIT 032022 1,046.56 314519 11/16/2022 150980 BONDESON,DOUG 41.85 BONDESON MILEAGE OCTOBER 2022 429786 20221029 2012.6277 MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE CABLE TV JOINT POWERS 41.85 314520 11/16/2022 100152 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MIN WINE 193.45 WINE 429765 346416169 2270.6430 GOLF-WINE GOLF FOOD&BEVERAGE 821.80 WINE-FOOD&WINE EVENT 429831 346416170 2270.6430 GOLF-WINE GOLF FOOD&BEVERAGE 1,015.25 314521 11/16/2022 100082 BURNSVILLE,CITY OF 7,869.38 SAN SEWER USER FEES 3RD QTR 429852 202200000013 5380.6318 BURNSVILLE/EAGAN SWR REIMBURSESEWER LIFT STN REPAIR&MNTC 7,869,38 314522 11/16/2022 158118 CAPON!ART PARK 147.00 HCSC ROCKS WORKSHOP 429766 1827 1920.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES SENIOR CENTER 55,00 MOSIAC SEED CLASS 429763 1873 1920.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES SENIOR CENTER 202.00 314523 11/16/2022 151149 CHEM-AQUA,INC. 1,118.59 AVSA WATER TREATMENT-CONDENSER 429752 7964611 5210.6214 CHEMICALS ARENA 1 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,152.34 HAYES COOLING TOWER TREATMENT 429847 7997960 5210.6214 CHEMICALS ARENA 1 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 2,270.93 314524 11/16/2022 100096 CITY WIDE WINDOW SERVICES 32.14 WINDOW CLEANING 429829 712226 5095.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVLIQUOR#3 OPERATIONS 32.14 314525 11/16/2022 130960 COLDSPRING GRANITE COMPANY 121.00 DATE SCROLL-JOHNSON 429698 RI1953061 5605.6325 COLUMBARIUM CEMETERY R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/16/2022 9:59:09 Council Check Register by GL Page- 19 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 10/31/2022-- 11/18/2022 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unil 314525 11/16/2022 130960 COLDSPRING GRANITE COMPANY Continued... 306.90 NICHE PLAQUE-ADAMS 429699 RI1953964 5605.6325 COLUMBARIUM CEMETERY 427_90 314526 11/16/2022 100114 CUB FOODS 39.90 WATER FOR TRUCKS 429724 202210241524 1330.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE OPERATIONS 39,90 314527 11/16/2022 143882 CULLIGAN 366.20 AVSA SEASON START SOFT.SALT 430179 157985475324OCT 5210.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA 1 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 22 149.00 HAYES WATER SOFTNER MAINT 430181 157985539939OCT 5270,6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT ARENA 2 EQUIPMENT MAINT-HAVE: 22 515.20 314528 11/16/2022 156145 CYBER ADVISORS INC 2,250.00 VCISO MONTHLY SERVICES 429838 94820 2112.6235 2022141G CONSULTANT SERVICES CARES ACT 2020 2,250,00 314529 11/16/2022 101320 DISTRICT 196 COMMUNITY EDUCATI 299.00 INSTRUCTOR TRAINING. 429808 20220504 1940.6275 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL AQUATIC SWIM CENTER 299.00 INSTRUCTOR TRAINING. 429809 20220504A 1940.6275 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL AQUATIC SWIM CENTER 299.00 INSTRUCTOR TRAINING. 429810 20220607 1930.6275 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL REDWOOD CC 299.00 INSTRUCTOR TRAINING. 429811 20220607A 1940.6275 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL AQUATIC SWIM CENTER 285.00 LIFEGUARD TRAINING. 429812 20220812 1940.6275 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL AQUATIC SWIM CENTER 1,481.00 314530 11/16/2022 150163 GALLS 696.60 SWAT UNIFORMS 429836 22532541 1210.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE POLICE FIELD OPERATIONS/PATRO 197.12 SWAT COTHING 429774 22556147 1210.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE POLICE FIELD OPERATIONS/PATRO 893,72 314531 11/16/2022 100711 GIRARDS BUSINESS SOLUTIONS,INC 850.00 CHECK SCANNER ANNUAL MAINT. 429746 2212CIT5192 5305.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT WATER MGMT/REPORT/DATA ENTR' 850.00 CHECK SCANNER ANNUAL MAINT. 429746 2212CIT5192 5365.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT SEWER MGMT/REPORTS/DATA ENT 1,700.00 314532 11/16/2022 101328 GOVCONNECTION INC 442.34 LCD MONITORS(2) 429835 73460927 1030.6725 CAPITAL OUTLAY-OFFICE EQUIP INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 208.99 LAPTOP DOCKING STATIONS 429780 73464870 1030.6725 CAPITAL OUTLAY-OFFICE EQUIP INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 651.33 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/16/2022 9:59:09 Council Check Register by GL Page- 20 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 10/31/2022-- 11/18/2022 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 314532 11/16/2022 101328 GOVCONNECTION INC Continued... 314533 11/16/2022 157960 GOVHR USA LLC 9,642.95 RECRUITMENT COMMUNITY DEV DIR 429832 21122622 1960.6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES CONTINGENCY 9,642,95 314534 11/16/2022 119258 GRANT,JOHN 55.00 UB REFUND 14531 EUREKA CT 429881 20221110C 5301.4997 WATER/SEWER ACCT REFUNDS WATER&SEWER FUND REVENUE 55.00 314535 11/16/2022 102369 HUNTERS WOOD ASSOCIATION 150.00 DEPOSIT REFUND 429815 46796815 1000.2410 CUSTOMER DEPOSITS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 150.00 314536 11/16/2022 116232 ICMA MEMBERSHIP RENEWALS 1,073.00 ICMA MEMBERSHIP-LAWELL 429750 20221104 1010.6280 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION 1,073.00 314537 11/16/2022 132246 IPROMOTEU INC 404.00 TEMP.TATTOOS 429718 2045816MPT 1275.6239 PRINTING POL COMMUN OUTREACH/CRIME P 404.00 314538 11/16/2022 100255 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR 4,354.40 LIQ#2 00000109 429923 2166994 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 34.26 FREIGHT#2 00000109 429924 2166994 5055,6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 2.40 FREIGHT#3 00000109 430020 2166995 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 3,800.50 LIQ#1 00000109 429892 2166996 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 51.07 FREIGHT#1 00000109 429893 2166996 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 6,238.82 WINE#1 00000109 429980 2166997 5015,6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 104.40 FREIGHT#1 00000109 429981 2166997 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 4.80 FREIGHT#1 00000109 429894 2166998 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 1.20 FREIGHT#3 00000109 430021 2166999 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 364.00 LIQ#1 00000109 429895 2167000 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 7.20 FREIGHT#1 00000109 429896 2167000 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 278.00 WINE#1 00000109 429982 2167001 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 7.18 FREIGHT#1 00000109 429983 2167001 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 3,60 FREIGHT#3 00000109 430022 2167002 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 1.20 FREIGHT#3 00000109 429951 2167003 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 7,328.90 LIQ#1 00000109 429897 2167004 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 70.33 FREIGHT#1 00000109 429898 2167004 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 1,695.00 WINE#1 00000109 429984 2167005 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/16/2022 9:59:09 Council Check Register by GL Page- 21 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 10/31/2022-- 11/18/2022 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unil 314538 11/16/2022 100255 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR Continued... 33.01 FREIGHT#1 00000109 429985 2167005 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 8,622.00 LIQ#3 00000109 429952 2167007 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 54.00 FREIGHT#3 00000109 429953 2167007 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 2,423.52 WINE#3 00000109 430023 2167008 5085,6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 21.80 FREIGHT#3 00000109 430024 2167008 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 13,136.55 LIQ#1 00000109 429899 2167009 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 81.60 FREIGHT#1 00000109 429900 2167009 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 2,539.00 LIQ#3 00000109 429954 2167010 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 13.21 FREIGHT#3 00000109 429955 2167010 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 1,801.59 LIQ#2 00000109 429925 2167011 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 21.60 FREIGHT#2 00000109 429926 2167011 5055.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 1,697.00 LIQ#2 00000109 429927 2167012 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 21,59 FREIGHT#2 00000109 429928 2167012 5055.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 1,690.50 WINE#2 00000109 430002 2167013 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 34.81 FREIGHT#2 00000109 430003 2167013 5055.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 4.80 FREIGHT#2 00000109 430004 2167014 5055.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 157.50 LIQ#2 00000109 429929 2167015 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 2,40 FREIGHT#2 00000109 429930 2167015 5055.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 114.00 LIQ#2 00000109 429931 2167016 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 2.40 FREIGHT#2 00000109 429932 2167016 5055.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 2,460.10 LIQ#2 00000109 429933 2167017 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 28.80 FREIGHT#2 00000109 429934 2167017 5055.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 444_00 LIQ#2 00000109 429935 2167018 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 9.61 FREIGHT#2 00000109 429936 2167018 5055.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 2,004.00 LIQ#3 00000109 429956 2167019 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 25.20 FREIGHT#3 00000109 429957 2167019 5085,6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 5,403.20 WINE#3 00000109 430025 2167020 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 88.80 FREIGHT#3 00000109 430026 2167020 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 4,80 FREIGHT#3 00000109 429958 2167021 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 760.85 LIQ#3 00000109 429959 2167022 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 4.81 FREIGHT#3 00000109 429960 2167022 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 7,315.00 WINE#3 00000109 430027 2167023 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 62.40 FREIGHT#3 00000109 430028 2167023 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 4,067.75 LIQ#3 00000109 429961 2167024 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 33.64 FREIGHT#3 00000109 429962 2167024 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 235.50 WINE#3 00000109 430029 2167025 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 3.60 FREIGHT#3 00000109 430030 2167025 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 3,439.00 LIQ#3 00000109 429963 2167026 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 11.40 FREIGHT#3 00000109 429964 2167026 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/16/2022 9:59:09 Council Check Register by GL Page- 22 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 10/31/2022-- 11/18/2022 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 314538 11/16/2022 100255 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR Continued... 46.00 WINE#3 00000109 430017 2167361 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 6.00 FREIGHT#3 00000109 430018 2167361 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 358.20 WINE#2 00000109 429998 2168601 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 6.00 FREIGHT#2 00000109 429999 2168601 5055.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 631.92 LIQ#1 00000109 429901 2171979 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 8.40 FREIGHT#1 00000109 429902 2171979 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 1,190.80 WINE#1 00000109 429986 2171980 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 16.79 FREIGHT#1 00000109 429987 2171980 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 1,736.00 LIQ#1 00000109 429903 2171981 5015_6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 9.60 FREIGHT#1 00000109 429904 2171981 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 432,00 CMLIQ#1 00000109 429905 2171982 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 6.00 LIQ#1 00000109 429906 2171982 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 924.00 WINE#1 00000109 429988 2171983 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 16.80 FREIGHT#1 00000109 429989 2171983 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 628.75 LIQ#1 00000109 429907 2171984 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 9.90 FREIGHT#1 00000109 429908 2171984 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 614.00 WINE#1 00000109 429990 2171985 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 12.02 FREIGHT#1 00000109 429991 2171985 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 192.00 WINE#2 00000109 430005 2171986 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 3.60 FREIGHT#2 00000109 430006 2171986 5055.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 150.50 LIQ#2 00000109 429937 2171987 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 2.40 FREIGHT#2 00000109 429938 2171987 5055.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 468.00 LIQ#2 00000109 429939 2171988 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 2.40 FREIGHT#2 00000109 429940 2171988 5055.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 296.00 WINE#2 00000109 430007 2171989 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 6.01 FREIGHT#2 00000109 430008 2171989 5055.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 37.00 TAX#2 00000109 429941 2171990 5055.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 1.20 FREIGHT#2 00000109 429942 2171990 5055.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 234.00 LIQ#3 00000109 429965 2171991 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 1.20 FREIGHT#3 00000109 429966 2171991 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 490.00 WINE#3 00000109 430031 2171992 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 4.81 FREIGHT#3 00000109 430032 2171992 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 337.00 LIQ#3 00000109 429967 2171993 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 2.40 FREIGHT#3 00000109 429968 2171993 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 259.50 LIQ#3 00000109 429969 2171994 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 3.59 FREIGHT#3 00000109 429970 2171994 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 52.00 WINE#3 00000109 430033 2171995 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 1.20 FREIGHT#3 00000109 430034 2171995 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 85.00 WINE#3 00000109 430035 2171996 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/16/2022 9:59:09 Council Check Register by GL Page- 23 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 10/31/2022-- 11/18/2022 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 314538 11/16/2022 100255 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR Continued... 2.40 FREIGHT#3 00000109 430036 2171996 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 3.60 FREIGHT#3 00000109 430037 2176556 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 480.00 LIQ#1 00000109 429912 2176557 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 7.20 FREIGHT#1 00000109 429913 2176557 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 256,00 WINE#1 00000109 429992 2176558 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 4.80 FREIGHT#1 00000109 429993 2176558 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 2.40 FREIGHT#2 00000109 430009 2176559 5055.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 2,698.35 LIQ#1 00000109 429914 2176560 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 30.60 FREIGHT#1 00000109 429915 2176560 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 2,117.05 WINE#1 00000109 429994 2176561 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 29.99 FREIGHT#1 00000109 429995 2176561 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 941.75 LIQ#1 00000109 429916 2176562 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 10.80 FREIGHT#1 00000109 429917 2176562 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 1,090,00 WINE#1 00000109 429996 2176563 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 19.22 FREIGHT#1 00000109 429997 2176563 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 51.95 TAX#1 00000109 429918 2176564 5015.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 1.20 FREIGHT#1 00000109 429919 2176564 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 192,00 WINE#3 00000109 430038 2176565 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 3.60 FREIGHT#3 00000109 430039 2176565 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 1,671.79 WINE#2 00000109 430010 2176566 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 37.20 FREIGHT#2 00000109 430011 2176566 5055.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 252.00 LIQ#2 00000109 429943 2176567 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 1.20 FREIGHT#2 00000109 429944 2176567 5055,6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 1,057.70 WINE#2 00000109 430012 2176568 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 18.00 FREIGHT#2 00000109 430013 2176568 5055.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 518.00 LIQ#2 00000109 429945 2176569 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 8.40 FREIGHT#2 00000109 429946 2176569 5055.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 120,00 WINE#2 00000109 430014 2176570 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 1.20 FREIGHT#2 00000109 430015 2176570 5055.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 1,685.76 LIQ#3 00000109 429971 2176571 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 12.00 FREIGHT#3 00000109 429972 2176571 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 3,469.95 WINE#3 00000109 430040 2176572 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 47.99 FREIGHT#3 00000109 430041 2176572 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 572.00 WINE#3 00000109 430042 2176573 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 11.99 FREIGHT#3 00000109 430043 2176573 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 326.00 LIQ#3 00000109 429973 2176574 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 2,40 FREIGHT#3 00000109 429974 2176574 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 161.40 WINE#3 00000109 430044 2176575 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 4.80 FREIGHT#3 00000109 430045 2176575 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/16/2022 9:59:09 Council Check Register by GL Page- 24 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 10/31/2022-- 11/18/2022 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 314538 11/16/2022 100255 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR Continued... 6,001.00 LIQ#1 00000109 429920 2177077 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 66.07 FREIGHT#1 00000109 429921 2177077 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES .20 FREIGHT#3 00000109 429975 2177590 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 1,800.00 LIQ#2 00000109 429947 2177591 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 24.00 FREIGHT#2 00000109 429948 2177591 5055.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 4,080.00 LIQ#3 00000109 429976 2177592 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 54,00 FREIGHT#3 00000109 429977 2177592 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 1,035.85 LIQ#2 00000109 429949 2177593 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 14.40 FREIGHT#2 00000109 429950 2177593 5055.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 1,597,00 LIQ#3 00000109 429978 2177594 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 9.60 FREIGHT#3 00000109 429979 2177594 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 10.83- CMWINE#2 00000109 430001 224060 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 208,77- CMWINE#3 00000109 430019 225149 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 5.73- CMWINE#3 00000109 430016 225601 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 9,23- CMLIQ#2 00000109 429922 226654 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 14.00- CMWINE#2 00000109 430000 226655 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 17.72- CMLIQ#1 00000109 429911 228496 5015,6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 3.67- CMLIQ#1 00000109 429909 228497 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 34.50- CMLIQ#1 00000109 429910 228498 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 124,805.95 314539 11/16/2022 145922 KLAUSLER,TIMOTHY WILLIAM 52.49 KLAUSLER MILEAGE OCTOBER 2022 429783 20221025 2012,6277 MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE CABLE TV JOINT POWERS 52.49 314540 11/16/2022 151278 KLINE,HARRY 56.54 KLINE MILEAGE OCTOBER 2022 429782 20221028 2012.6277 MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE CABLE TV JOINT POWERS 56.54 314541 11/16/2022 140826 LITTRELL,NANCY 88.00 CHURCH BASEMENT TRIP REFUND 429768 41954686 1001.4360 REC-SENIOR PROGRAM REVENUE GENERAL FUND REVENUE 88.00 CHURCH BASEMENT TRIP REFUND 429767 41954775 1001.4360 REC-SENIOR PROGRAM REVENUE GENERAL FUND REVENUE 176.00 314542 11/1612022 116371 LOFFLER COMPANIES INC(CONT I 69.39 COPIER MAINTENANCE 429839 4183533 1400,6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT INSPECTIONS MANAGEMENT 105.97 COPIER MAINTENANCE 429839 4183533 1920.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT SENIOR CENTER 540.72 COPIER MAINTENANCE 429839 4183533 1700.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT PARK&RECREATION MANAGEMEN 582.48 COPIER MAINTENANCE 429839 4183533 1200.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT POLICE MANAGEMENT 2,113.85 COPIER MAINTENANCE 429839 4183533 1030.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/16/2022 9:59:09 Council Check Register by GL Page- 25 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 10/31/2022-- 11/18/2022 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 314542 11/16/2022 116371 LOFFLER COMPANIES INC(CONT I Continued... 10.21 COPIER MAINTENANCE 429839 4183533 2012.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT CABLE TV JOINT POWERS 185.19 COPIER MAINTENANCE 429839 4183533 2205.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT GOLF MANAGEMENT 45.25 COPIER MAINTENANCE 429839 4183533 5065.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT LIQUOR#2 OPERATIONS 63.37 COPIER MAINTENANCE 429839 4183533 5025.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT LIQUOR#1 OPERATIONS 67.27 COPIER MAINTENANCE 429839 4183533 5095.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT LIQUOR#3 OPERATIONS 4.41 COPIER MAINTENANCE 429839 4183533 5210.6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT ARENA 1 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 3,788.11 314543 11/16/2022 158119 MCCOMBER,SUSAN 88.00 CHURCH BASEMENT TRIP REFUND 429769 44656117 1001.4360 REC-SENIOR PROGRAM REVENUE GENERAL FUND REVENUE 88.00 314544 11/16/2022 100309 MENARDS 38.12 REDWOOD REPAIRS 429715 44083 1930.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES REDWOOD CC 118.81 EAGLE SCOUT PROJECT-LANDSCAP 429705 44155 1720,6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE 670;89 BLDG REPAIR SUPPLIES 429741 44184 5210.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA 1 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 27.85 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 429697 44258 1610.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET/BOULEVARD REPAIR&MN' 156,51 AVSA BLEACHER WALKWAY REPAIR 429740 44262 5210.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA 1 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 101.44 CLAMPS,STORAGE CONT,BOLTS 429739 44291 5210.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA 1 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 47,10 RESTORATION SUPPLIES 429823 44481 1610.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET/BOULEVARD REPAIR&MN' 15.91- GOLF USE TAX 429776 44493 2200.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT VALLEY WOOD GOLF 15.91 GOLF USE TAX 429776 44493 2230.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF SHOP BUILDING MAINTENAN' 231.36 GLOVES,SAFETY GLASSES 429776 44493 2230.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF SHOP BUILDING MAINTENANI 14.29 TARP REPAIR FOR#344 429824 44543 1610.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET/BOULEVARD REPAIR&MN' 150.39 LEAF TARP 429818 44554 1720,6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE 13.99 TRUCK WASHING BRUSH 429822 44675 1610.6211 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT STREET/BOULEVARD REPAIR&MN 181.16 IA1 FLOOR STRIPPER,MISC 429778 44715 5210.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA 1 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 140.93 IA1 PUMP,SPRINKLER,MISC 429777 44748 5210,6211 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT ARENA 1 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 41.74 AVCC GUTTER HANGERS,MISC 430182 44861 1900.6211 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT AV COMMUNITY CENTER 63.67 AVCC GAP FILLER,SCRAPER,MISC 430183 44940 1900.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES AV COMMUNITY CENTER 18.35 AVCC MULCH 430184 45064 1900.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES AV COMMUNITY CENTER 72.95 AVCC VISE GRIPS,MISC TOOLS 430184 45064 1900.6211 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT AV COMMUNITY CENTER 2,089.55 314545 11/16/2022 123290 METAL SUPERMARKETS 148.05 MATERIALS TO REPAIR HYDRANT 429710 1045934 5330.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS WTR MAIN/HYDRANT/CURB STOP N 148.05 314546 11/16/2022 101446 MID AMERICA METER INC 50.00 12067 GANTRY COURT TEST 429703 224777 5310.6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES WATER METER RPR/REPLACE/REAI R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/16/2022 9:59:09 Council Check Register by GL Page- 26 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 10/31/2022-- 11/18/2022 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 314546 11/16/2022 101446 MID AMERICA METER INC Continued... 50.00 314547 11/16/2022 154158 MIRACLE RECREATION EQUIPMENT CO 1,420.73 INCLUSIVE SWING,HERITAGE PARK 429843 848851 1735.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS PARK PLAY EQUIPMENT MAINTENA1 1,420.73 314548 11/16/2022 121822 MN DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 20.00 ALCOHOL BUYERS CARD 429856 74246DEC22 2205.6280 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF MANAGEMENT 20.00 314549 11/16/2022 155164 MN OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH 352.50 DOT CDL TESTING 429859 411782A 5305.6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES WATER MGMT/REPORT/DATA ENTR' 352.50 DOT CDL TESTING 429859 411782A 5365.6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES SEWER MGMT/REPORTS/DATA ENT 64.00 BILL DRUG TEST 429806 411782B 1530.6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES FLEET&BUILDINGS-CMF 274.00 RICK,AL,DUANE DRUG TESTS 429819 411782C 1710.6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES PARK MAINTENANCE MANAGEMEN 1,043.00 314550 11/16/2022 152263 MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS 17,695.68 NEW SQUAD RADIOS FOR TURNOVER 429695 8281473142 7400.1740.096 MACHINERY&EQUIP-8 YRS VERF-POLICE BAL SHEET 1,261.08 U12 RADIO ENCRYPTION 429696 8281502399 7407.6740 CAPITAL OUTLAY-MACH/EQ/OTHER VERF-FIRE 18,956.76 314551 11/16/2022 158120 MY PICKLEBALL COACH 825.00 PICKLEBALL INSTR SESSION#3&4 429853 101122 1855.6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES REC FOOTBALL&SOCCER 1,567.50 PICKLEBALL INSTR SESSION#2 429853 101122 1855.6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES REC FOOTBALL&SOCCER 2,392.50 314552 11/16/2022 100995 NAPA AUTO PARTS 7_10 OIL FILTERS FORD TRUCKS 429873 5763878354 1765,6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 73.56 BRAKE CLEANER 429876 5763878965 1530.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES FLEET&BUILDINGS-CMF 25.26 CABIN FILTERS#201 429875 5763878966 1765.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 105.92 314553 11/16/2022 152421 NICKELSON,STEVEN 246.25 MIAMMA CONF-COHASSET-NICKELSON 429805 20220905 5260.6276 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP OTHERARENA 2 MANAGEMENT-HAYES 246.25 314554 11/16/2022 114052 NOVACARE REHABILITATION 120 00 NEW EMPLOYEE PREHIRE SCREENING 429821 846017001 1610.6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES STREET/BOULEVARD REPAIR&MN' 120.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/16/2022 9:59:09 Council Check Register by GL Page- 27 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 10/31/2022-- 11/18/2022 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 314554 11/16/2022 114052 NOVACARE REHABILITATION Continued... 314555 11/16/2022 110957 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE INC 299.70 ABSORBENT 429883 3245149050 1330.6214 CHEMICALS FIRE OPERATIONS 299.70 314556 11/16/2022 100751 PHILLIPS WINE&SPIRITS INC 7.78- CMWINE#2 00000106 430078 226656 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 782.88 LIQ#1 00000106 430046 6486023 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 3.60 FREIGHT#1 00000106 430047 6486023 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 99,25 LIQ#1 00000106 430048 6486024 5015,6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 2,935.02 WINE#1 00000106 430049 6486024 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 58.48 FREIGHT#1 00000106 430050 6486024 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 1.20 FREIGHT#3 00000106 430085 6486025 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 737.50 WINE#2 00000106 430079 6486026 5055,6520 WINE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 11.99 FREIGHT#2 00000106 430080 6486026 5055.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 993.60 LIQ#3 00000106 430062 6486027 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 10.78 FREIGHT#3 00000106 430063 6486027 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 1,506.10 WINE#3 00000106 430086 6486028 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 24.00 FREIGHT#3 00000106 430087 6486028 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 48.30 TAX#3 00000106 430064 6486029 5085_6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 57,80 NTAX#3 00000106 430065 6486029 5085.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 3.60 FREIGHT#3 00000106 430066 6486029 5085,6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 1,373.40 WINE#3 00000106 430088 6489895 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 21.60 FREIGHT#3 00000106 430089 6489895 5085,6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 811.91 LIQ#1 00000106 430051 6489896 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 7.40 FREIGHT#1 00000106 430052 6489896 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 224.10 WINE#1 00000106 430072 6489897 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 4.80 FREIGHT#1 00000106 430073 6489897 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 54.90 TAX#1 00000106 430053 6489898 5015.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 2.40 FREIGHT#1 00000106 430054 6489898 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 538.00 WINE#2 00000106 430081 6489899 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 10.18 FREIGHT#2 00000106 430082 6489899 5055.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 176.85 WINE#3 00000106 430090 6489900 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 9.60 FREIGHT#3 00000106 430091 6489900 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 3,389,13 LIQ#1 00000106 430055 6493535 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 40,83 FREIGHT#1 00000106 430056 6493535 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 3,037.55 WINE#1 00000106 430074 6493536 5015.6520 WINE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 62.44 FREIGHT#1 00000106 430075 6493536 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 220.60 NTAX#1 00000106 430057 6493537 5015.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 3.60 FREIGHT#1 00000106 430058 6493537 5015.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/16/2022 9:59:09 Council Check Register by GL Page- 28 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 10/31/2022-- 11/18/2022 Check It Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 314556 11/16/2022 100751 PHILLIPS WINE&SPIRITS INC Continued... 3,248.69 LIQ#2 00000106 430060 6493538 5055,6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 48,91 FREIGHT#2 00000106 430061 6493538 5055.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 444.20 WINE#2 00000106 430083 6493539 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 12.03 FREIGHT#2 00000106 430084 6493539 5055.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 1,584.75 LIQ#3 00000106 430067 6493540 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 13.79 FREIGHT#3 00000106 430068 6493540 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 99.25 LIQ#3 00000106 430069 6493541 5085.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 1,439,70 WINE#3 00000106 430070 6493541 5085.6520 WINE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 26.44 FREIGHT#3 00000106 430071 6493541 5085.6550 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 1,84- CMLIQ#2 00000106 430059 682147 5055.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 8.96- CMWINE#2 00000106 430077 682148 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 9.59- CMWINE#2 00000106 430076 682149 5055.6520 WINE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 24,152.98 314557 11/16/2022 143892 PIRTEK BURNSVILLE 27.23- GOLF USE TAX 429729 BUT00006821 2200.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT VALLEYWOOD GOLF 27.23 GOLF USE TAX 429729 BUT00006821 2240.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS GOLF EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 396.00 HYDRAULIC HOSE 429729 BUT00006821 2240.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS GOLF EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 396.00 314558 11/16/2022 101500 PREMIUM WATERS INC 57.99 WATER 429770 319088396 2215.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF CLUBHOUSE BUILDING 57.99 314559 11/16/2022 113059 RAINBOW TREECARE 2,073.75 MUNI CENTER OAK TREATMENTS 430177 444158A 1060.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES MUNICIPAL BLDG&GROUNDS MN1 2,073.•75 314560 11/16/2022 155420 RIES FARMS LLC 953.92 STUMP GRINDINGS DISPOSAL 429844 26420 1520.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVNATURAL RESOURCES 953.92 314561 11/16/2022 100165 RIVER COUNTRY COOPERATIVE 2.35- STR SALES TAX ADJUST 429877 20221102 1630,6212 MOTOR FUELS/OILS STREET EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCI 2.35 STR SALES TAX ADJUST 429877 20221102 1000.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 35,34 PROPANE 429877 20221102 1630.6212 MOTOR FUELS/OILS STREET EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCI 35.34 314562 11/16/2022 100042 ROTARY CLUB OF APPLE VALLEY 62.50 ROTARY CLUB DUES-LAWELL 429803 2320A 1010.6280 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/16/2022 9:59:09 Council Check Register by GL Page- 29 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 10/31/2022-- 11/18/2022 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 314562 11/16/2022 100042 ROTARY CLUB OF APPLE VALLEY Continued... 229.06 ROTARY CLUB MEALS-LAWELL 429803 2320A 1010.6275 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL ADMINISTRATION 291.56 314563 11/16/2022 137298 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORPORATION 75.14- GOLF USE TAX 429846 8106084884 2200.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT VALLEYWOOD GOLF 75.14 GOLF USE TAX 429846 8106084884 2215.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GOLF CLUBHOUSE BUILDING 1,122.95 VW ELEVATOR INSPECTION SERVICE 429846 8106084884 2215.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GOLF CLUBHOUSE BUILDING 1,122.95 314564 11/16/2022 157897 SCOTT NELSON COACHING INC 1,000.00 LEADERSHIP/TEAM BUILDING 429745 2259 1700.6275 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL PARK&RECREATION MANAGEMEN 1,000.00 314565 11/16/2022 118355 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP 560.00 VMWARE SOFTWARE SUBSC. 429834 B16015633 1030.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 560.00 314566 11/16/2022 158134 SMITH,RAYMOND 22.69 UB REFUND 14319 HICKORY WAY 429880 20221110B 5301.4997 WATER/SEWER ACCT REFUNDS WATER&SEWER FUND REVENUE 22.69 314567 11/16/2022 158132 THIEL,PHYLLIS 30.00 UB REFUND 14525 EUREKA CT 429879 20221110A 5301.4997 WATER/SEWER ACCT REFUNDS WATER&SEWER FUND REVENUE 30.00 314568 11/16/2022 101342 THOMSON REUTERS-WEST 359.68 BACKGROUND CHECKS-OCT 429779 847284516 1215.6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES POLICE DETECTIVE UNIT 359.68 314569 11/16/2022 148300 TOTAL REFRIGERATION SYSTEMS INC 400.53 LS#3 CLOGGED COOLER DRAIN PIPE 429870 24865509 5095.6266 REPAIRS-BUILDING LIQUOR#3 OPERATIONS 400.53 314570 11/16/2022 121872 TWIN CITY HARDWARE 32.00 P2 KEYS FOR PD 429701 PS12152514 1060.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES MUNICIPAL BLDG&GROUNDS MN] 32.00 20221047 10/31/2022 100873 HEALTHPARTNERS(DENTAL CLAIMS 4,489,63 DENTAL CLAIMS 10/20-10/26/22 430165 20221026 7105.6146 DENTAL INSURANCE INSURANCE TRUST DENTAL 4,489,63 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/16/2022 9:59:09 Council Check Register by GL Page- 30 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 10/31/2022-- 11/18/2022 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 20221047 10/31/2022 100873 HEALTHPARTNERS(DENTAL CLAIMS Continued... 20221103 11/10/2022 148015 EMPOWER 150.00 MNDCP-ROTH 457 CONTRIBUTIONS 429536 1109228262610 9000.2120 ACCRUED BENEFIT LIABILITY PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET 1,590.00 MNDCP-457 CONTRIBUTIONS 429536 1109228262610 9000.2120 ACCRUED BENEFIT LIABILITY PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET 1,740,00 20221104 11/10/2022 148869 EMPOWER(HCSP) 452.14 SERGEANT HCSP FUNDING-GROSS WA 429538 1109228262612 9000.2120 ACCRUED BENEFIT LIABILITY PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET 842.47 ADMIN HCSP FUNDING-GROSS WAGES 429538 1109228262612 9000.2120 ACCRUED BENEFIT LIABILITY PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET 1,287.13 SCH 2 HCSP FUNDING-GROSS WAGES 429538 1109228262612 9000.2120 ACCRUED BENEFIT LIABILITY PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET 1,398.68 POLICE HCSP FUNDING-GROSS WAGE 429538 1109228262612 9000.2120 ACCRUED BENEFIT LIABILITY PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET 43,054.51 HCSP FUNDING-ANN LV/COMP 429538 1109228262612 9000.2120 ACCRUED BENEFIT LIABILITY PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET 47,034.93 20221105 11/14/2022 102664 US BANK 10,456.06 EMPLOYEE MEDICARE 429546 110922826268 9000.2111 ACCRUED FEDERAL/FICA PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET 10,456.06 CITY SHARE MEDICARE 429546 110922826268 9000.2111 ACCRUED FEDERAL/FICA PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET 30,178.08 EMPLOYEE FICA 429546 110922826268 9000.2111 ACCRUED FEDERAL/FICA PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET 30,178.08 CITY SHARE FICA 429546 110922826268 9000.2111 ACCRUED FEDERAL/FICA PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET 69,616.01 FEDERAL TAXES PR 429546 110922826268 9000.2111 ACCRUED FEDERAL/FICA PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET 150,884.29 20221106 11/10/2022 101238 MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PAYMEN 121.50 CHILD SUPPORT DEDUCTIONS 429544 110922826266 9000.2120 ACCRUED BENEFIT LIABILITY PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET 397.50 CHILD SUPPORT DEDUCTIONS 429545 110922826267 9000.2120 ACCRUED BENEFIT LIABILITY PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET 519.00 20221107 11/14/2022 100657 MN DEPT OF REVENUE 31,599 27 STATE TAX WITHHOLDING 429543 110922826265 9000.2112 ACCRUED STATE W/H PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET 31,599.27 20221108 11/14/2022 100392 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT AS 59,948.85 EMPLOYEE SHARE PERA 429542 110922826264 9000.2114 ACCRUED PERA PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET 79,224,72 CITY SHARE PERA 429542 110922826264 9000.2114 ACCRUED PERA PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET 139,173.57 20221109 11/14/2022 148841 FURTHER 6,150.76 HSA EMPLOYEE FUNDING 429537 1109228262611 9000.2125 ACCRUED HSA/HRA BENEFIT PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET 6,150.76 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/16/2022 9:59:09 Council Check Register by GL Page- 31 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 10/31/2022-- 11/18/2022 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 20221110 11/10/2022 151440 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS Continued... 2,455.50 ROTH 457-PLAN#301171-FIRE TOO 429539 1109228262613 9000.2120 ACCRUED BENEFIT LIABILITY PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET 2,455.50 20221111 11/10/2022 100240 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS-457 FT 27,681.43 ICMA-PLAN#301171-FIRE TOO 429540 110922826262 9000.2120 ACCRUED BENEFIT LIABILITY PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET 27,681 43 20221112 11/10/2022 126459 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS-ROTH 2,622 47 ROTH IRA-PLAN#705481 429547 110922826269 9000.2120 ACCRUED BENEFIT LIABILITY PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET 2,622.47 20221113 11/18/2022 102664 US BANK 873.52 EMPLOYEE MEDICARE 429757 111522900475 9000.2111 ACCRUED FEDERAL/FICA PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET 873.52 CITY SHARE MEDICARE 429757 111522900475 9000.2111 ACCRUED FEDERAL/FICA PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET 3,341.79 FEDERAL TAXES PR 429757 111522900475 9000.2111 ACCRUED FEDERAL/FICA PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET 5,088.83 20221114 11/18/2022 100657 MN DEPT OF REVENUE 2,069.47 STATE TAX WITHHOLDING 429756 111522900474 9000.2112 ACCRUED STATE W/H PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET 2,069.47 20221115 11/17/2022 100038 APPLE VALLEY FIREFIGHTERS RELI 1,173.25 FIRE RELIEF DUES 429753 111522900471 9000.2120 ACCRUED BENEFIT LIABILITY PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET 1,173.25 20221116 11/17/2022 151440 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS 250.00 ROTH 457-PLAN#301171-FIRE TOO 429758 111522900476 9000.2120 ACCRUED BENEFIT LIABILITY PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET 250.00 20221117 11/17/2022 100240 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS-457 FT 200.00 ICMA-PLAN#301171-FIRE TOO 429754 111522900472 9000.2120 ACCRUED BENEFIT LIABILITY PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET 200.00 20221118 11/17/2022 100241 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS-457 PT 3,279.41 ICMA-PLAN#306561-FIRE ONLY 429755 111522900473 9000.2120 ACCRUED BENEFIT LIABILITY PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET 3,279.41 20221119 11/7/2022 100873 HEALTHPARTNERS(DENTAL CLAIMS 3,406.71 DENTAL CLAIMS 10/27-11/2/22 430164 20221102 7105.6146 DENTAL INSURANCE INSURANCE TRUST DENTAL 3,406.71 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/16/2022 9:59:09 Council Check Register by GL Page• 32 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 10/31/2022-- 11/18/2022 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 20221119 11/7/2022 100873 HEALTHPARTNERS(DENTAL CLAIMS Continued... 913,033.79 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Checks 225,347.31 EFT Payments 429,818.52 A/P ACH Payment 257,867.96 Total Payments 913,033.79 r' z �J ,bJ. R55CKS2 LOGIS100 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/16/2022 9:59:14 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 1 10/31/2022- 11/18/2022 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 72,396.80 02010 CABLE TV RESERVE FUND 647.09 02025 ROAD ESCROW FUND 577.75 02040 SOLID WASTE GRANT 5,801.28 02090 PARTNERS IN EDUCATION 3,521.48 02095 CENTRAL VILLAGE PARKING LOT 71.82 02110 CARES ACT 2020 2,250.00 02200 VALLEYWOOD GOLF FUND 16,299.25 05000 LIQUOR FUND 221,382.20 05100 GOLF FUND 862.44 05200 ARENA FUND 17,592.21 05300 WATER&SEWER FUND 77,869.72 05500 STORM DRAINAGE UTILITY FUND 2,496.67 05600 CEMETERY FUND LEVEL PROGRAM 531.76 05800 STREET LIGHT UTIL FUND 38,903.04 07100 INSURANCE TRUST DENTAL FUND 7,896.34 07400 VERF-POLICE 17,695.68 07405 VERF-FIRE 1,261.08 09000 PAYROLL CLEARING FUND 424,977.18 Report Totals 913,033.79 I R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/22/202213:55:03 Council Check Register by GL Page- 1 1 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 11/14/2022-- 11/25/2022 Check# Dale Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 27768 11/25/2022 100101 ACE HARDWARE .18- DISCOUNT 430505 101305962071 1060,6333 GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS MUNICIPAL BLDG&GROUNDS MN] 1.84 TAPE FOR MC 430505 101305962071 1060.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES MUNICIPAL BLDG&GROUNDS MN1 1,59- DISCOUNT 430375 101360962441 5210.6333 GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS ARENA 1 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 15.99 AVSA TOOLS 430375 101360962441 5210.6211 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT ARENA 1 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1.99- DISCOUNT 430373 101400961951 5320.6333 GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/F 19,99 DOOR HANDLE AT WELL SITE 430373 101400961951 5320.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/F .99- DISCOUNT 430374 101400962181 5380.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS SEWER LIFT STN REPAIR&MNTC 9.98 LIFT#3 SECURITY ITEMS 430374 101400962181 5380,6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS SEWER LIFT STN REPAIR&MNTC 1.70 WTP MAINT NUTS AND BOLTS 430284 101400962331 5325.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT FCLTY MNTC/R 44.75 27769 11/25/2022 150791 BALD MAN BREWING 314.20 BEER#2 00052212 430335 6691 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 314.20 27770 11/25/2022 157587 BIX PRODUCE COMPANY LLC 154.30 NO TAX#1 00052874 430336 5578743 5015.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 154.30 27771 11/25/2022 151877 BLACK STACK BREWING,INC. 447.00 BEER#3 00052297 430338 19863 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 432.00 BEER#3 00052297 430339 19967 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 297.00 BEER#1 00052297 430337 20059 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 488.00 BEER#3 00052297 430340 20060 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 18.00- CMBEER#3 00052297 430341 20060 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 1,646.00 27772 11/25/2022 157178 BLUE CLOUD DISTRIBUTION OF MINNESOTA 1,039.00 BEER#1 00052855 430342 100960249 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 1,884.00 BEER#3 00052855 430344 100960284 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 270.00 BEER#2 00052855 430343 100960285 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 3,193.00 27773 11/25/2022 143314 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE 36.25- CMBEER#3 00051160 430387 6450049 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 499.95 BEER#2 00051160 430383 657055 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 1,242,50 BEER#1 00051160 430376 658692 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 615.65 BEER#3 00051160 430386 658708 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 380.55 BEER#2 00051160 430384 659808 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 237.00 LIQ#1 00051160 430377 659820 5015.6510 LIQUOR LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/2 2/2 0221 3:55:03 Council Check Register by GL Page- 2 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 11/14/2022-- 11/25/2022 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 27773 11/25/2022 143314 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE Continued... 499.50 BEER#1 00051160 430378 659820 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 687,60 BEER#3 00051160 430388 659828 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 70.72- CMBEER#1 00051160 430379 659846 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 8.06- CMTAX#1 00051160 430380 659846 5015.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 1,449.85 BEER#3 00051160 430389 660878 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 536.40 BEER#2 00051160 430385 660884 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 1,180.70 BEER#1 00051160 430381 660898 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 44.25- CMBEER#1 00051160 430382 660925 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES • 7,170.42 27774 11/25/2022 141474 COLE PAPERS INC. 225.92 PAPER TOWELS CMF 430274 10220350 1540.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES CMF BUILDINGS&GROUNDS MNTC 225.92 27775 11/25/2022 100128 DAKOTA ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION 24.43 943 1/2 GARDENVIEW DR NOV 430472 200010052737NOV 5805.6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 22 121.72 SIGN VALLEYWOOD ENTRANCE 430474 200010078741NOV 2215,6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC GOLF CLUBHOUSE BUILDING 22 146.15 27776 11/25/2022 120313 FASTENAL COMPANY 236.53 HYDRANT REPAIR BOLTS 430266 MNLAK194723 5330.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS WTR MAIN/HYDRANT/CURB STOP IV 65,70 SIGN HARDWARE 430275 MNLAK194746 1680.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES TRAFFIC SIGNS/SIGNALS/MARKER; 302.23 27777 11/25/2022 103314 INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS 8.98 5X8 RULED PAPER PADS 430269 IN3996482 1200,6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE MANAGEMENT 11.54 PACKING TAPE,SUPPLY ROOM 430289 IN4001314 1035.6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES FINANCE 11.95- PAPER PADS 430494 SCN117778 1200.6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE MANAGEMENT 8,57 27778 11/25/2022 151539 JUNKYARD BREWING CO.LLC 160.00 BEER#3 00052261 430406 4873 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 293.00 BEER#3 00052261 430405 4938 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 453.00 27779 11/25/2022 149844 KEEPSAKE CIDERY LLP 209.00 BEER#1 00052101 430407 AV111022 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 209.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/22/202213:55:03 Council Check Register by GL Page- 3 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 11/14/2022-- 11/25/2022 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 27779 11/25/2022 149844 KEEPSAKE CIDERY LLP Continued... 27780 11/25/2022 100021 M AMUNDSON LLP 33.60 TAX#2 00044390 430410 351600 5055.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 1,032.90 NTAX#2 00044390 430411 351600 5055.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 189.32 TAX#1 00044390 430408 351923 5015.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 2,248.24 NOTAX#1 00044390 430409 351923 5015.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 31.33 TAX#3 00044390 430412 351924 5085.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 2,616.02 NTAX#3 00044390 430413 351924 5085.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 6,151.41 27781 11/25/2022 152514 MEGA BEER LLC 451.70 BEER#3 00052423 430415 19284 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 182.00 BEER#1 00052423 430414 19500 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 633.70 27782 11/25/2022 100337 MN DEPT OF LABOR&INDUSTRY 10.00 FIRE BOILER LICENSE 430280 ABR0291512X 1340.6399 OTHER CHARGES FIRE BLDG&GROUNDS MNTC 40.00 FAC BOILER LICENSE 430498 ABR0291677X 1940.6399 OTHER CHARGES AQUATIC SWIM CENTER 10.00 GOLF BOILER LICENSE 430497 ABR0293626X 2215.6399 OTHER CHARGES GOLF CLUBHOUSE BUILDING 10.00 FIRE BOILER LICENSE 430279 ABR0293669X 1340.6399 OTHER CHARGES FIRE BLDG&GROUNDS MNTC 70.00 27783 11/25/2022 100348 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO 178.52 215 REPAIR PARTS 430297 136954700 1765.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 178.52 27784 11/25/2022 146279 NORDIC MECHANICAL SERVICES,I 295.00 RPR EXHAUST FAN MC LOWER LEV 430491 67230 1060.6266 REPAIRS-BUILDING MUNICIPAL BLDG&GROUNDS MN1 260.00 FURNACE REPAIRS 430493 67232 1730.6266 REPAIRS-BUILDING PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE 555.00 27785 11/25/2022 111219 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 3,617.56 NEW DETECTIVE CAR TURNOVER 430262 54711 7400.1750.048 TRANSPOR EQUIPMNT-4 YRS VERF-POLICE BAL SHEET 3,617.56 27786 11/25/2022 152480 RMB ENVIRONMENTAL LAB 191.66 WATER QUALITY LAB SAMPLE 430268 B007241 5505.6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES STORM DRAIN MNTC/RPR/SUMPS 191.66 27787 11/25/2022 145118 STEEL TOE BREWING,LLC R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/22/202213:55:03 Council Check Register by GL Page- 4 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 11/14/2022-- 11/25/2022 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 27787 11/25/2022 145118 STEEL TOE BREWING,LLC Continued.., 105.00 BEER#2 00051551 430436 47734 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 105.00 27788 11/25/2022 143618 TURFWERKS 44.41 PARTS-340 UNIT 430217 J174883 1665.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS STREET SNOW&ICE MATERIALS 44.41 ' 314571 11/23/2022 152066 3 GUYS SEWING 60.00 EMBROIDERY 430276 9408 1330.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE FIRE OPERATIONS 60.00 314572 11/23/2022 153409 56 BREWING LLC 38.00 BEER#1 00052517 430322 5620615 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 53.00 BEER#2 00052517 430324 5620616 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 76.00 BEER#1 00052517 430321 5620798 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 129.00 BEER#2 00052517 430323 5620799 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 296.00 314573 11/23/2022 100089 ADVANCE AUTO PARTS 5.14 PUMP PANEL TRUCK 4983 430496 1594417926 1350.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS FIRE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 15.89 PUMP FUEL TREATMENT 430259 1594418449 5505,6212 MOTOR FUELS/OILS STORM DRAIN MNTC/RPR/SUMPS 21.03 314574 11/23/2022 153995 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 86.52 CAB AIR FILTERS SQUAD CARS 430273 1 WJ1 HH44FDD7 1210.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS POLICE FIELD OPERATIONS/PATRO 86.52 314575 11/23/2022 100037 APPLE VALLEY COLLISION INC 2,784.23 COLLISION REPAIR#421 428041 A1CP793244 7205.6399 OTHER CHARGES INSURANCE CLAIMS 2,784,23 314576 11/23/2022 125174 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 50.00- CMBEER#1 00047806 430327 348155 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 269.30 BEER#1 00047806 430325 3569106 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 263.10 BEER#2 00047806 430329 3569107 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 1,634.80 BEER#3 00047806 430331 3569108 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 1,372.15 BEER#1 00047806 430326 3570347 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 544.60 BEER#2 00047806 430330 3570348 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 1,144.75 BEER#3 00047806 430332 3570349 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 55.40 BEER#3 00047806 430333 3571415 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/22/202213:55:03 Council Check Register by GL Page- 5 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 11/14/2022-- 11/25/2022 i Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 314576 11/23/2022 125174 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY Continued... 586.68 BEER#1 00047806 430328 3571600 5015,6530 BEER LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 1,595.80 BEER#3 00047806 430334 3571601 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 7,416.58 314577 11/23/2022 118892 ASPEN MILLS 141.90 SHIRTS,EMBROIDERY,PATCHWORK 430287 303788 1330.6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE FIRE OPERATIONS 141.90 314578 11/23/2022 100296 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MIN-BEER 10,462.15 BEER#3 00000105 430367 346300515 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 134.90- CMBEER#3 00000105 430368 346300515 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 186.20 TAX#3 00000105 430366 346300516 5085.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 7,428.90 BEER#2 00000105 430358 346300518 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 49.80- CMBEER#2 00000105 430359 346300518 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 124.00 TAX#2 00000105 430360 346301444 5055.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 11,984.12 BEER#1 00000105 430345 346302620 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 136.40- CMBEER#1 00000105 430346 346302620 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 64.65 BEER#1 00000105 430347 346302622 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 4,182.00 BEER#1 00000105 430348 346370640 5015_6530 BEER LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 14,982.30 BEER#3 00000105 430369 346410552 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 113.90 TAX#3 00000105 430370 346410553 5085.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 7,994.25 BEER#2 00000105 430361 346410555 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 146.00- CMBEER#2 00000105 430362 346410555 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 129.30 TAX#1 00000105 430349 346410556 5015.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 165.00 NTAX#1 00000105 430350 346410556 5015.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 55.00- CNTAX#1 00000105 430351 346410556 5015.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 28,021.10 BEER#1 00000105 430352 346410557 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 104.40- CMBEER#1 00000105 430353 346410557 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 25.55 TAX#1 00000105 430356 346512236 5015.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 323,15 TAX#3 00000105 430371 346512238 5085.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 5,633.05 BEER#2 00000105 430364 346512563 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 20.80- CMBEER#2 00000105 430365 346512563 5055,6530 BEER LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 224.10 TAX#2 00000105 430363 346512564 5055.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 124.00 BEER#1 00000105 430357 346512565 5015,6530 BEER LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 5,115.00 BEER#3 00000105 430372 346513168 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 10,447.47 BEER#1 00000105 430354 346513170 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 338.40- CMBEER#1 00000105 430355 346513170 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 106,744.49 314579 11/23/2022 100073 BREITUNG,CORY L R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/22/202213:55:03 Council Check Register by GL Page- 6 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 11/14/2022-- 11/25/2022 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 314579 11/23/2022 100073 BREITUNG,CORY L Continued... 23.00 RENEW CLASS A WATER-BREITUNG 430251 20221102 5315,6280 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS WATER TRAINING/SCHOOUMEETIN 23.00 314580 11/23/2022 157217 C EMERY NELSON INC 151.81 BLOWER FILTERS WTP 430258 39867 5325.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS WATER TREATMENT FCLTY MNTC/R 151.81 314581 11/23/2022 100319 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 65.99 SWIM NOV 430478 110055472NOV22 1940.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS AQUATIC SWIM CENTER 2,755.31 CH NOV 430488 110055563NOV22 1060.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS MUNICIPAL BLDG&GROUNDS MN1 3,306,92 IA1 NOV 430314 110060944NOV22 5210.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS ARENA 1 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,181.18 CMF NOV 430316 110061900NOV22 1540.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS CMF BUILDINGS&GROUNDS MNTC 56.07 DELANEY PK NOV 430311 55372148NOV22 1730.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE 119.25 FIRE STA 3 NOV 430313 55533657NOV22 1340.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS FIRE BLDG&GROUNDS MNTC 165,13 LIQ 2 NOV 430312 55533673NOV22 5065.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS LIQUOR#2 OPERATIONS 116,23 VALLEY MID PK NOV 430310 55611420NOV22 1730.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE 179.01 REDWOOD NOV 430307 55612972NOV22 1930.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS REDWOOD CC 39.13 WELL 2 NOV 430309 55675664NOV22 5320.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/F 1,458.92 AVCC NOV 430308 55686299NOV22 1900.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS AV COMMUNITY CENTER 392.19 OLD CH NOV 430317 55710289NOV22 2092.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS EDUCATION BUILDING FUND 77.93 CMF STRG BLD 2 NOV 430305 55793483NOV22 1540.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS CMF BUILDINGS&GROUNDS MNTC 56.07 GALAXIE PK NOV 430470 55848238NOV22 1730.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE 40,14 AV EAST PK NOV 430304 55851521NOV22 1730.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE 133.35 FIRE STA 2 NOV 430320 55851539NOV22 1340.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS FIRE BLDG&GROUNDS MNTC 141,39 WELL 5 NOV 430300 55851562NOV22 5320.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/F 53.91 WELL 4 NOV 430301 55851604NOV22 5320,6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/F 2,972.50 WTP NOV 430469 55877872NOV22 5325.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS WATER TREATMENT FCLTY MNTC/R 67.72 WELL 1 NOV 430299 55887046NOV22 5320,6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/F 250.90 FIRE 1 NOV 430302 55888184NOV22 1340.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS FIRE BLDG&GROUNDS MNTC 2,713.01 IA2 NOV 430295 55978928NOV22 5265.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS ARENA 2 BLDG MAINTENANCE-HAY 624.74 CMF STRG BLD 1 NOV 430303 56034416NOV22 1540.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS CMF BUILDINGS&GROUNDS MNTC 34.83 HAGEMEISTER PK NOV 430294 56100324NOV22 1730.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE 308.24 LIQ 1 NOV 430298 56265598NOV22 5025.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS LIQUOR#1 OPERATIONS 77.26 JC ACTIVITY CTR NOV 430315 56281637NOV22 1730.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE 23.52 AQUATIC CTR NOV 430318 56284078NOV22 1940.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS AQUATIC SWIM CENTER 33.79 HUNTINGTON PK NOV 430292 56346620NOV22 1730.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE 84.65 CMF STRG BLD 3 NOV 430291 56696487NOV22 1540.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS CMF BUILDINGS&GROUNDS MNTC 25.31 460 REFLECTION RD NOV 430293 75761361 NOV22 5380.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS SEWER LIFT STN REPAIR&MNTC 61.60 SWIM UNIT D NOV 430290 78955218NOV22 1940,6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS AQUATIC SWIM CENTER 24.54 SWIM PK NOV 430477 79512695NOV22 1940.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS AQUATIC SWIM CENTER R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/22/202213:55:03 Council Check Register by GL Page- 7 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary i 11/14/2022-- 11/25/2022 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 314581 11/23/2022 100319 CENTERPOINT ENERGY Continued... 413.33 HCSC NOV 430319 79615332NOV22 1920.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS SENIOR CENTER 43.31 UTIL SAN LIFT 2 GEN NOV 430487 91747147NOV22 5380.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS SEWER LIFT STN REPAIR&MNTC 1,066.22 GOLF NOV 430479 96338967NOV22 2215.6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS GOLF CLUBHOUSE BUILDING 19,163.59 314582 11/23/2022 100878 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 15.82 AVSACABLE-NOV 430306 835230604010513 5205.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS ARENA 1 MANAGEMENT ONOV22 15.82 314583 11/23/2022 100282 CINTAS CORPORATION 38.11 CMF MATS 430492 4137180966 1540.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVCMF BUILDINGS&GROUNDS MNTC 3.94 ENTRY RUG REPLACEMENT 430288 4137181063 1920.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVSENIOR CENTER 42.05 314584 11/23/2022 100510 CORE&MAIN 229.88 CLAMPS FOR HYDRANT DIFFUSER 430267 Q926525 5330.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS WTR MAIN/HYDRANT/CURB STOP IV 229.88 314585 11/23/2022 101007 CROSS NURSERIES INC 159.85 PLANT FOR WEST SIDE MC 430272 49829 1060.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES MUNICIPAL BLDG&GROUNDS MN-I 159.85 314586 11/23/2022 100114 CUB FOODS 51.36 REHAB SUPPLIES 430277 202211101409 1330.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE OPERATIONS 51.36 314587 11/23/2022 100777 DEX MEDIA EAST LLC 27.00 ADVERTISING-NOV 430283 110115110NOV22 2205.6239 PRINTING GOLF MANAGEMENT 27.00 314588 11/23/2022 100434 DOUGHERTY MOLENDA SOLFEST HILL 25.00 WOODWINDS 8TH(PC22.06.S) 430466 209767 4502.6231 2022140G LEGAL SERVICES IMPROVEMENTS-ASSESSED 123.00 AV GENERAL CRIMINAL MATTERS 430464 209768 1055.6231 LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL PROSECUTING ATTORNEY 361.03 CODE VIOLATIONS-MISC 430449 209796 1050.6231 LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL GENERAL SERVICES 51.88 KOPPERS,RUETGERS,RAIN CARBON 430450 209797 1050.6231 LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL GENERAL SERVICES 131.86 CIDER RIDGE MARKETPLACE(PC19-0 430451 209798 4502.6231 2019141G LEGAL SERVICES IMPROVEMENTS-ASSESSED 885.00 AV COMMERCE CENTER PC19-20-SB 430452 209799 4502.6231 2022139G LEGAL SERVICES IMPROVEMENTS-ASSESSED 1,555.96 ORCHARD PL PHASE 2 ROCKPORT LL 430453 209800 4502.6231 2021119G LEGAL SERVICES IMPROVEMENTS-ASSESSED 1,107.63 ORCHARD PL 2ND ADDN ROCKPORT L 430454 209801 4502.6231 2020150G LEGAL SERVICES IMPROVEMENTS-ASSESSED R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/22/202213:55:03 Council Check Register by GL Page- 8 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 11/14/2022-- 11/25/2022 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 314588 11/23/2022 100434 DOUGHERTY MOLENDA SOLFEST HILL Continued... 1,555.94 EAGLE POINTE PC21-05-SB 430455 209802 4502.6231 2021137G LEGAL SERVICES IMPROVEMENTS-ASSESSED 121.06 NATL OPIOID SETTLEMENT 430456 209803 1050.6231 LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL GENERAL SERVICES 79.12 KARAMELLA-OPUS AV IND-PC 21-30 430457 209804 4502.6231 2022131G LEGAL SERVICES IMPROVEMENTS-ASSESSED 1,853.45 WOODWINDS 8TH(PC22.06.S) 430465 209805 4502.6231 2022140G LEGAL SERVICES IMPROVEMENTS-ASSESSED 79.12 PAHL'S MARKET 430458 209806 4502.6231 2022145L LEGAL SERVICES IMPROVEMENTS-ASSESSED 659.30 NORTH CREEK/MAGELLAN 2ND ADDN 430459 209807 1050,6231 2022126G LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL GENERAL SERVICES 184.61 APPLE VALLEY SQUARE 7TH(202215 430460 209808 4502.6231 2022155L LEGAL SERVICES IMPROVEMENTS-ASSESSED 237.35 AV COMMERCE CENTER 2ND ADDN SC 430461 209809 4502.6231 2022139G LEGAL SERVICES IMPROVEMENTS-ASSESSED - 4,427.28 AV FIRE STATION#2 PLAT 430462 209810 4422.6231 2021170G LEGAL SERVICES '21 FACILITIES CIP 490.81 KJ WALK INC 430463 209811 1050.6231 LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL GENERAL SERVICES 13,929.40 314589 11/23/2022 153159 DREKKER BREWING CO 848.25 BEER#3 00052472 430390 14987 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 976.50 BEER#3 00052472 430391 15047 5085,6530 BEER LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 1,824.75 314590 11/23/2022 100168 FERRELLGAS 233.71 PROPANE FORKLIFT 430490 1120957437 1630.6212 MOTOR FUELS/OILS STREET EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCI 233,71 314591 11/23/2022 148989 GERVING,JOSHUA 71.68 IACP CONF-DALLAS-GERVING 430282 20221109 1225.6276 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP OTHERPOLICE TRAINING 27.04 IACP CONF-DALLAS-GERVING 430281 20221110 1225.6276 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP OTHERPOLICE TRAINING 98.72 314592 11/23/2022 100314 GREAT LAKES COCA-COLA DISTRIBU 522.29 TAX#3 00000122 430393 3608217994 5085.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 43.68 NTAX#3 00000122 430394 3608217994 5085.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 957.09 TAX#1 00000122 430392 3646217475 5015.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 1,523.06 314593 11/23/2022 100222 HACH COMPANY 168.13 WATER TESTING SUPPLIES 430256 13306292 5325.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT FCLTY MNTC/R 313.39 TESTING SUPPLIES 430257 13312605 5325.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT FCLTY MNTC/R 249.76 WATER TESTING SUPPLIES C/L 430285 13319913 5325.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT FCLTY MNTC/R 52.02 FLUORIDE ACCUVAC 430263 13321446 5325.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT FCLTY MNTC/R 364.14 ACCUVAC FLUORIDE 430265 13324864 5325.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT FCLTY MNTC/R 1,147.44 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/22/202213:55:03 Council Check Register by GL Page- 9 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 11/14/2022-- 11/25/2022 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO_# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 314594 11/23/2022 100231 HOHENSTEINS INC �` Continued... 3,205.45 BEER#3 00005574 430400 554802 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 87.00 TAX#3 00005574 430401 554802 5085.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 2,230.05 BEER#1 00005574 430395 554867 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 897.60 BEER#2 00005574 430399 556867 5055.6530 BEER LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 1,302.25 BEER#3 00005574 430402 556868 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 905.75 BEER#1 00005574 430396 556894 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 1,262.00 BEER#3 00005574 430403 558734 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 75.50 TAX#3 00005574 430404 558734 5085.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 1,000.00 BEER#1 00005574 430397 558773 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 80,12 TAX#1 00005574 430398 558773 5015.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 11,045.72 314595 11/23/2022 144447 IRRIGATION-CITY INC 193.27 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 430271 20719 2027.6810 2022106R CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS ROAD ESCROW 193.27 314596 11/23/2022 155361 LIGHTNING RESTORATION LLC 2.00 PARTIAL REFUND 14614 HANOVER L 430254 20221108 1001.4072 STATE SURTAX COLLECTED GENERAL FUND REVENUE 114,00 PARTIAL REFUND 14614 HANOVER L 430254 20221108 1001.4060 PERMIT-BUILDING PERMIT GENERAL FUND REVENUE 116.00 314597 11/23/2022 100288 LMC INSURANCE TRUST 183,557.00 4TH QTR PROP INSURANCE 430207 20221104 7205.6311 INSURANCE-PROPERTY/LIABILITY INSURANCE CLAIMS 183,557.00 314598 11/23/2022 101616 LMC INSURANCE TRUST 47.67 WE DED SPENCER SEPT 2022 430219 19446 7205.6315 WORKERS COMP-DEDUCTIBLE INSURANCE CLAIMS 100.00 WC DED BOOTH SEPT 2022 430261 19452 7205.6315 WORKERS COMP-DEDUCTIBLE INSURANCE CLAIMS 8.46 WC DED SAHOLT SEPT 2022 430253 19519 7205.6315 WORKERS COMP-DEDUCTIBLE INSURANCE CLAIMS 377.51 WC DED ZELLMER SEPT 2022 430252 19578 7205,6315 WORKERS COMP-DEDUCTIBLE INSURANCE CLAIMS 100.65 WC DED BENJAMIN SEP 2022 430218 19595 7205.6315 WORKERS COMP-DEDUCTIBLE INSURANCE CLAIMS 228,338.00 W-COMP 4TH QTR 430220 20221104 7205.6142 WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE CLAIMS 228,972.29 314599 11/23/2022 119353 MADISON NATIONAL LIFE INS CO INC 216.45 STD FEES NOVEMBER 2022 430206 20221101 1020.6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES 2,258,74 LTD INSURANCE NOVEMBER 430206 20221101 9000.2113 ACCRUED LTD PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET 2,475.19 314600 11/23/2022 100309 MENARDS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/22/202213:55:03 Council Check Register by GL Page- 10 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 11/14/2022-- 11/25/2022 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 314600 11/23/2022 100309 MENARDS Continued... 39.99 HEATER FOR TOWER PIT 430255 44037 5320.6211 . SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/F 32.47 SAMPLING VALVE FOR WELL 430264 44417A 5320.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER WELL/BOOSTER STN MNT/F 11.26 ADHESIVE/FURNITURE POLISH 430489 44526 1060.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES MUNICIPAL BLDG&GROUNDS MN-I 4.29 PK SOLID PUNCH 430260 44804 1730.6211 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE 11.99 OFFICE AND LUNCH ROOM SUPPLIES 430286 44938 1060.6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES MUNICIPAL BLDG&GROUNDS MN1 100.00 - 314601 11/23/2022 154324 MILK AND HONEY LLC . 482.00 BEER#1 00052601 430416 11164 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 408.00 BEER#3 00052601 430417 11166 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 890.00 314602 11/23/2022 147490 MINNESOTA PUMP WORKS 3,637.00 BUBBLER-LIFTS GREASE CONTROL 429582 INV019290 5380.6211 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT SEWER LIFT STN REPAIR&MNTC 3,637.00 314603 11/23/2022 151869 MODIST BREWING CO LLC 228.00 BEER#1 00052303 430418 36015 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 406.00 BEER#3 00052303 430419 36256 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 634.00 314604 11/23/2022 151805 MONTGOMERY BREWING 336.00 BEER#1 00052282 430421 3146 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 148 00 BEER#1 00052282 430420 3156 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 484 00 314605 11/23/2022 143411 NORDSTROM,CYNTHIA 228.38 UB REFUND 6060 158TH ST W 430503 20221117A 5301.4997 WATER/SEWER ACCT REFUNDS WATER&SEWER FUND REVENUE 228.38 314606 11/23/2022 127905 OFFICE OF MN.IT SERVICES 360.15 LANGUAGE LINE-OCT 430296 W22100546 1200.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS POLICE MANAGEMENT 360.15 314607 11/23/2022 110957 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE INC 8.18 EQUIPMENT PARTS 430495 3245149736 1350.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS FIRE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 8.18 314608 11/23/2022 100374 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 281 05 TAX#1 00002171 430422 96011458 5015.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/22/202213:55:03 Council Check Register by GL Page- 11 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 11/14/2022-- 11/25/2022 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 314608 11/23/2022 100374 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY Continued... 281.05 314609 11/23/2022 151819 PERSONNEL EVALUATION INC 70.00 PEP EVALUATIONS 430278 45801 1200.6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES POLICE MANAGEMENT 70.00 314610 11/23/2022 158140 PIETROSKI,TANNER 10.63 UB REFUND 5003 147TH ST W 430502 20221117B 5301,4997 WATER/SEWER ACCT REFUNDS WATER&SEWER FUND REVENUE 10.63 314611 11/23/2022 156797 PORTAGE BREWING COMPANY 126.00 BEER#1 00052810 430423 3111 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 126 00 314612 11/23/2022 153484 PRYES BREWING COMPANY LLC 142.00 BEER#1 00052530 430425 45590 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 200.00 BEER#1 00052530 430424 46296 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 342.00 314613 11/23/2022 149126 RED BULL DISTRIBUTION COMPANY 824.64 TAX#1 00052064 430426 5003682175 5015.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 386.64 TAX#2 00052064 430427 5003796502 5055.6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 1,211.28 314614 11/23/2022 100410 ROSEMOUNT SAW&TOOL 56.35 CHIPPER BLADES 430270 325804 1610.6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS STREET/BOULEVARD REPAIR&MN 56.35 314615 11/23/2022 100042 ROTARY CLUB OF APPLE VALLEY 20.83 DUES-NORDQUIST-AUG 430499 23361 1100.6280 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS DEV MANAGEMENT 20.83 DUES-NORDQUIST-JULY 430499 23361 1100.6280 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS DEV MANAGEMENT 70.48 MEALS-NORDQUIST-JULY 430499 23361 1100.6275 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL DEV MANAGEMENT 88.10 MEALS-NORDQUIST-AUG 430499 23361 1100.6275 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL DEV MANAGEMENT 200.24 314616 11/23/2022 158139 SCHUMACHER,ROBERT 111.01 UB REFUND 15140 DUNDEE AVE 430501 20221117C 5301.4997 WATER/SEWER ACCT REFUNDS WATER&SEWER FUND REVENUE 111.01 314617 11/23/2022 149062 SET-MSW R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/22/202213:55:03 Council Check Register by GL Page- 12 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 11/14/2022-- 11/25/2022 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 314617 11/23/2022 149062 SET-MSW Continued... 36.00 SWEEPINGS-LEAVES 430504 103091331 1610.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVSTREET/BOULEVARD REPAIR&MN- 36.00 314618 11/23/2022 137382 SET MULCH 36.00 SWEEPINGS-LEAVES 430484 103091349 1610.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVSTREET/BOULEVARD REPAIR&MN 36.00 SWEEPINGS-LEAVES 430485 103091391 1610.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVSTREET/BOULEVARD REPAIR&MN 36.00 SWEEPINGS-LEAVES 430486 103091405 1610.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVSTREET/BOULEVARD REPAIR&MN 24.00 SWEEPINGS-LEAVES 430481 103091649 1610.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVSTREET/BOULEVARD REPAIR&MN 24.00 SWEEPINGS-LEAVES 430210 103091657 1610.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVSTREET/BOULEVARD REPAIR&MN 24.00 SWEEPINGS-LEAVES 430208 103091658 1610.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVSTREET/BOULEVARD REPAIR&MN 36.00 SWEEPINGS-LEAVES 430209 103091678 1610,6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVSTREET/BOULEVARD REPAIR&MN 24.00 SWEEPINGS-LEAVES 430482 103091679 1610.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVSTREET/BOULEVARD REPAIR&MN 24.00 SWEEPINGS-LEAVES 430483 103091691 1610.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVSTREET/BOULEVARD REPAIR&MN 36.00 SWEEPINGS-LEAVES 430215 103091759 1610,6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVSTREET/BOULEVARD REPAIR&MN 36.00 SWEEPINGS-LEAVES 430213 103091806 1610.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVSTREET/BOULEVARD REPAIR&MN 36.00 SWEEPINGS-LEAVES 430216 103091829 1610.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVSTREET/BOULEVARD REPAIR&MN 36.00 SWEEPINGS-LEAVES 430212 103091884 1610.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVSTREET/BOULEVARD REPAIR&MN 24,00 SWEEPINGS-LEAVES 430211 103091890 1610.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVSTREET/BOULEVARD REPAIR&MN 36.00 SWEEPINGS-LEAVES 430214 103091905 1610.6240 CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVSTREET/BOULEVARD REPAIR&MN 468.00 314619 11/23/2022 100829 SHAMROCK GROUP INC 207.45 NO TAX#1 00052880 430428 2828748 5015,6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 334.95 NO TAX#3 00052880 430432 2828855 5085.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 109.40 NO TAX#2 00052880 430431 2830574 5055.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#2 STOCK PURCHASES 118.20 NO TAX#1 00052880 430429 2832372 5015.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 74.00 CO2/NITRO SYS RENTALS 430500 2835476 2270.6310 RENTAL EXPENSE GOLF FOOD&BEVERAGE 27.50 NO TAX#1 00052880 430430 2836680 5015.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 871.50 314620 11/23/2022 154912 SP3 LLC 325.35 BEER#3 00052668 430435 167550 5085.6530 BEER LIQUOR#3 STOCK PURCHASES 252.25 BEER#1 00052668 430433 168304 5015.6530 BEER LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 355.00 BEER#1 00052668 430434 169115 5015,6530 BEER LIQUOR#1 STOCK PURCHASES 932.60 314621 11/23/2022 157211 THE STANDARD 330.25 BASIC LIFE INSURANCE NOVEMBER 430205 20221101 9000.2117 ACCRUED LIFE INSUR-BASIC PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET 9,862,85 SUPP/DEP NOVEMBER 430205 20221101 9000.2118 ACCRUED LIFE INSUR-SUPP/DEPEND PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET 10,193.10 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/22/202213:55:03 Council Check Register by GL Page- 13 Council Check Register by Invoice&Summary 11/14/2022-- 11/25/2022 Check# Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 314621 11/23/2022 157211 THE STANDARD Continued... 314622 11/23/2022 100631 VERIZON WIRELESS 40.01 IA1 WIRELESS DATA(PADS 430480 9919796728 5250.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS ARENA 1 CONCESSIONS 40.01 UTIL WIRELESS DATA(PADS 430480 9919796728 5305.6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS WATER MGMT/REPORT/DATA ENTR' 80.02 314623 11/23/2022 100363 XCEL ENERGY 80,42 SL ELECTRIC JCRR NORTH CR42 430471 51001308560110C 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND T22 115.94 SL ELECTRIC-147TH&JCR 430476 51045623470CT22 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 342.35 STREET LIGHTS ELECTRIC 430475 5168727942NOV22 5805.6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE STREET LIGHT UTILITY FUND 538.71 20221120 11/16/2022 100331 MN DEPT OF LABOR&INDUSTRY(EFT) 99.46- LESS 2%RETENTION OCT 430473 20221031 1001.4099 PERMIT-OTHER GENERAL FUND REVENUE 3,00- PERMIT SURCHARGE ADJ 430473 20221031 1001.4072 STATE SURTAX COLLECTED GENERAL FUND REVENUE 4,973.00 PERMIT SURCHARGE OCT 430473 20221031 1001.4072 STATE SURTAX COLLECTED GENERAL FUND REVENUE 4,870.54 20221121 11/14/2022 148841 FURTHER 2,362.57 HSA EMPLOYER FUNDING 430468 20221114 9000.2125 ACCRUED HSA/HRA BENEFIT PAYROLL CLEARING BAL SHEET 2,362.57 20221122 11/15/2022 100000 MN DEPT OF REVENUE 3,939.00 SALES/USE TAX-GENERAL FUND 430467 20221115 1000,2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 8,604.00 SALES/USE TAX-GOLF 430467 20221115 2200.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT VALLEYWOOD GOLF 15,483.00 SALES/USE TAX-LIQUOR#2 430467 20221115 5000.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 32,882.00 SALES/USE TAX-LIQUOR#3 430467 20221115 5000.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 39,985.00 SALES/USE TAX-LIQUOR#1 430467 20221115 5000.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 34.00 SALES/USE TAX-ARENA 430467 20221115 5200,2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT ARENA FUND BALANCE SHEET 4,675.00 SALES/USE TAX-WATER&SWR 430467 20221115 5300.2330 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENT WATER&SEWER FUND BAL SHEET 105,602.00 742,651.77 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Checks 604,401,86 ry2'\ EFT Payments 112,835.11 .°V/ 0p 166 1 ry'1/ A/P ACH Payment 25,414.80 S: y 1'7-1" Total Payments 742,651.77 1 I I I R55CKS2 LOGIS100 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 11/22/202213:55:06 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 1 11/14/2022 - 11/25/2022 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 22,063.17 02025 ROAD ESCROW FUND 193.27 02090 PARTNERS IN EDUCATION 392.19 02200 VALLEYWOOD GOLF FUND 9,902.94 04420 '21 FACILITIES CIP 4,427.28 04500 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 7,695.04 05000 LIQUOR FUND 243,402.43 05200 ARENA FUND 6,124.16 05300 WATER&SEWER FUND 13,935.11 05500 STORM DRAINAGE UTILITY FUND 207.55 05800 STREET LIGHT UTIL FUND 563.14 07200 RISK MANAGEMENT/INSURANCE FUND 415,313.52 07400 VERF-POLICE 3,617.56 09000 PAYROLL CLEARING FUND 14,814.41 Report Totals 742,651.77 H • ••• ITEM: 5.A. •••• ••• Apple COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 8, 2022 Valley SECTION: Regular Agenda Description: 2023 City Budget and Property Tax Levy Staff Contact: Department/ Division: Ron Hedberg, Finance Director Finance Department ACTION REQUESTED: 1. Conduct the Truth in Taxation budget meeting 2. Adopt resolution approving the 2023 budget and property tax levy SUMMARY: The 2023 budget process began on April 1, 2022, when the City Council held a goal setting session with staff and provided specific direction on the 2023 budget to minimize the impacts to the property taxes paid by property owners while also addressing the capital improvement needs at the Central Maintenance Facility and at the Fire Stations along with the impacts of inflation. This meeting was followed up with a budget discussion at the Informal City Council meeting on July 28, 2022, and September 8, 2022. The budget process requires that the City of Apple Valley adopt a final budget and property tax levy for 2023 and certify it to the Dakota County Auditor by December 31, 2022. Since the September 8, 2022, meeting, two changes have been made to the budget document. The first is the levy for the debt service for the recently awarded 2022a Capital Improvement Plan Bonds has been reduced by $1,700 to reflect the results of the bond sale, this $1,700 has been added to the levy offset for property tax delinquencies. The second is Dakota County has provided updated property values which lowered the taxable property values, which in turn increases the tax rates and impacts the projected increase in the City portion of property taxes to $110.59 or 9.50% versus the earlier projection of a $110.03 or 9.45% increase. These changes are included on pages 1 through 5 of the full budget document. BACKGROUND: The total levy for 2023 is proposed to be $32,039,000 up 7.42% or $2,214,000 over 2022. At this levy amount, the median valued home in Apple Valley of$352,800, that experienced an increase of 16.74% in value, will see the City's share of their property tax bill increase approximately $111 or 9.5% for 2023. Staff believes that the preliminary budget accomplishes a number of important objectives: • Retains a focus on the provision of basic City services and funds their provision at adequate levels. • Demonstrates a strong stewardship of existing infrastructure and plans for its repair/replacement in a proactive manner. • The proposed budget maintains the stated goal of the City Council to not Specially Assess for the annual street and infrastructure maintenance program by providing property tax levy support of the program in the form of a transfer from the General Fund. The property tax levy support of the City's annual street maintenance program was increased for the coming year to $3,971,000. • There are a few new staff positions proposed in the 2023/2024 budget to be added to keep up with the increased work demands of a growing community and are recapped below: Position Timing Remarks Assistant City Engineer Q 1 2023 Funded by Offsetting Revenues Police Investigative / Crime Analyst Q2 2023 Convert for Part-time to Full-time Police Officer Q3 2023 Addition to Patrol Staff Mechanic Q4 2024 To Coincide with New Building Central Maintenance Custodian(Part-time) Q4 2024 To Coincide with New Building • The 2023/2024 budget includes the second issue, 2022A, in the series of General Obligation Capital Improvement Plan Bonds. These bonds are being issued to finance improvements at the Fire Stations, construction of new a Police Garage Operations building and improvements at the Central Maintenance Facility. Included in the 2023 levy is $498,297 for this new 2022A bond issue. The proposed 2023 budget was presented to the City Council July 28, 2022. The direction received at the informal session was to go forward with the preliminary levy as presented and that additional meetings may be held prior to the December 8th budget meeting. Adoption of this proposed budget and property tax levy establishes the maximum levy for 2023. In the coming months the amount of the total levy may decrease, but not increase. The 2023 Property Tax Levy includes the on-going support of the Street and Infrastructure Replacement Program in the amount of$3,971,000. Breakdown of the 2023 Tax Levy: Levy Component 2022 2023 Difference %Change General Fund $24,179,439$25,514,435$1,334,996 5.52% Street Maintenance Program 3,801,000 3,971,000 170,000 4.47% Municipal Building Funds 204,000 381,000 177,000 86.77% Property Tax Delinquencies Allowance 50,000 51,700 1,700 3.40% Ice Arena Support 121,000 121,000 - 0.00% Debt Service -Voter Approved 1,074,470 1,105,455 30,985 2.88% Debt Service - Tax Capacity Based 395,091 894,410 499,319 126.38% Total $29,825,000$32,039,000$2,214,000 7.42% Overall in total, the property values are increasing 16.20%, with 0.33% coming from new construction and 15.87% coming from appreciation. The valuations for residential properties are projected to increase 18.13% for pay 2023, which is significantly higher than the other property classes. For example, commercial property values are increasing 1.61% overall and apartments are increasing 14.56%. As a result, there will be a shift in tax burden to the residential property class. Property Class Pay 2022 New MV Pay 2023 % Value Construction Appreciation Value Change Residential $5,316,482,834 $ 14,128,900 $ 949,534,901 $6,280,146,635 18.13% Comm. / Ind. 599,256,800 3,586,000 6,062,400 608,905,200 1.61% Agricultural 1,265,800 -0- (303,000) 962,800(23.94%) Utility 12,778,000 -0- 1,365,700 14,143,700 10.69% Personal 31,725,900 -0- 2,192,200 33,918,100 6.91% Property Apartments 665,633,800 4,027,500 92,899,100 762,560,400 14.56% Total $6,627,143,134 $21,742,400 1,051,751,301 7,700,636,835 16.20% Additional information can be obtained in the attached 2023 Proposed Operating Budget. BUDGET IM PACT: The resolution will establish the operating budget for 2023 and the tax levy for 2023. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution Resolution Budget Presentation CITY OF APPLE VALLEY RESOLUTION NO. 2023- RESOLUTION ADOPTING 2023 BUDGETS AND TAX LEVY WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the proposed 2023 operating budget on July 28th as set forth in Exhibit A of this resolution; and WHEREAS, the Council desires to adopt the operating budgets for management purposes; and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Statutes require the certification of the Budget and Tax Levy for taxes payable in 2023 by December 28,2022,to the County Auditor. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Apple Valley that revenue and expenditure budgets for 2023 shall be as noted in Exhibit A of this Resolution and as supported by the detailed document, as revised. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council that the 2023 scheduled levy for the 2013A GO Refunding Bonds is hereby reduced by$70,000 to reflect available resources and current needs to meet the payable 2023 debt service requirements on 2013A GO Refunding Bonds; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council that the following proposed sums of money be levied for the current year, collectible in 2023,upon the taxable property in the City of Apple Valley for the following purposes: General Purposes: $25,947,135 Annual Street Maintenance Program 3,971,000 Ice Arena support 121,000 Debt Levy: Market Value Based Debt Levy: GO. Refunding Bonds 2013A 930,000 GO Refunding Bonds 2015B 175,455 1,105,455 Tax Capacity Based Debt Levy: GO. Capital Improvement Bonds 2021B 396,113 GO. Capital Improvement Bonds 2022A 498,297 894,410 $32,039,000 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby instructed to transmit a certified copy of this Resolution to the County Auditor of Dakota County, Minnesota. ADOPTED this 8th day of December,2022. Clint Hooppaw,Mayor ATTEST: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk CERTIFICATE I, Pamela Gackstetter, City Clerk, hereby certify that the above resolution is a true and correct copy of a resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Apple Valley, Dakota County, Minnesota, on the date above indicated. Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk CITY OF APPLE VALLEY,MINNESOTA 2023 Operating Budget Summary Exhibit A Total Other Total Budgeted Subtotal Internal Budgeted General Funds Governmental Service Enterprise Funds Revenues: Fund 2023 Funds Funds Funds 2023 General property taxes-Current $29,866,435 $ - $29,866,435 $ - 121,000 $29,987,435 General property taxes-Mobile home 45,000 - 45,000 - - 45,000 General property tax-Delinq Net 50,000 - 50,000 - - 50,000 Property tax-Current&Delq Net $ 29,961,435 $ - $ 29,961,435 $ - $ 121,000 $30,082,435 Franchise&other taxes 529,000 273,500 802,500 - - 802,500 Special assessments 2,500 - 2,500 - - 2,500 Licenses 215,675 - 215,675 - - 215,675 Permits 1,748,800 - 1,748,800 - - 1,748,800 Intergovernmental 1,368,500 3,471,000 4,839,500 - 530,000 5,369,500 Charges for services 2,438,975 1,535,550 3,974,525 - 28,507,700 32,482,225 Fines and penalties 300,000 - 300,000 - - 300,000 Investment earnings 220,000 173,400 393,400 18,690 183,000 595,090 Other Revenues 181,900 10,151 192,051 162,000 135,100 489,151 Rentals 877,100 157,000 1,034,100 - - 1,034,100 Use of Reserves - - - - - - Admin Charges to other funds 1,095,200 - 1,095,200 1,647,260 - 2,742,460 Subtotal before transfers&debt 38,939,085 5,620,601 44,559,686 1,827,950 29,476,800 75,864,436 Debt Issued - - - 2,000,000 2,000,000 Transfers In 1,493,000 5,916,550 7,409,550 - - 7,409,550 Total revenues 40,432,085 11,537,151 51,969,236 1,827,950 31,476,800 85,273,986 Expenditures: Salaries&Wages 18,965,365 902,900 19,868,265 - 3,326,570 23,194,835 Social Security(FICA&Medicare) 967,305 69,075 1,036,380 - 253,815 1,290,195 PERA 1,986,040 44,925 2,030,965 - 236,225 2,267,190 Provided Insurance 2,564,795 101,300 2,666,095 - 431,555 3,097,650 Other Benefits(Work Comp,etc) 1,152,835 12,590 1,165,425 - 113,305 1,278,730 Total Personal Service 25,636,340 1,130,790 26,767,130 - 4,361,470 31,128,600 Supplies 1,479,730 129,095 1,608,825 - 473,675 2,082,500 Contractural Services 3,769,660 128,840 3,898,500 - 1,168,300 5,066,800 Utilities 577,075 65,000 642,075 - 798,210 1,440,285 Repairs&Maintenance 337,535 52,750 390,285 - 446,370 836,655 Travel,Training,Dues 704,535 31,265 735,800 - 150,970 886,770 Other Expenditures 1,820,110 55,900 1,876,010 - 4,912,765 6,788,775 Miscellaneous - - - - 322,000 322,000 Items for Resale 53,000 120,300 173,300 - 8,118,070 8,291,370 Capital Outlay 1,702,100 8,936,500 10,638,600 1,274,000 4,486,000 16,398,600 Depreciation - - - 1,360,360 4,697,000 6,057,360 Admin Fees - - - - 891,000 891,000 Debt Service - - - - 1,544,875 1,544,875 Subtotal before transfers 36,080,085 10,650,440 46,730,525 2,634,360 32,370,705 81,735,590 Transfers Out 4,352,000 914,550 5,266,550 - 1,643,000 6,909,550 Total expenditures 40,432,085 11,564,990 51,997,075 2,634,360 34,013,705 88,645,140 Revenues over(under)expenditures - (27,839) (27,839) (806,410) (2,536,905) (3,371,154) CITY OF APPLE VALLEY,MINNESOTA 2023 Operating Budget Summary-Other Governmental Funds Other Funds Valleywood Cable TV Cable TV Cable TV Future Road Golf Course Joint Powers Special Rev. Special Rev. Capital Improvement Revenues: Fund Fund PEG Fund Non-PEG Fund Projects Fund General property taxes-Current $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - General property taxes-Mobile home - - - - - General property tax-Delinq Net Property tax-Current&Delq Net $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Franchise&other taxes - - 71,500 202,000 - - Special assessments - - - - - - Licenses - - - - - - Permits - - - - - - Intergovernmental - - - - - 3,471,000 Charges for services 1,350,000 185,550 - - - - Fines and penalties - - - - - - Investment earnings - 1,500 1,000 - 150,000 - Other Revenues - - - - 10,151 - Rentals - - - - - - Use of Reserves - - - - - - Admin Charges to other funds - - - - - - Subtotal before transfers&debt 1,350,000 187,050 72,500 202,000 160,151 3,471,000 Debt Issued - - - - - - Transfers In 150,000 185,550 - - 500,000 4,575,000 Total revenues 1,500,000 372,600 72,500 202,000 660,151 8,046,000 Expenditures: Salaries&Wages 648,860 253,440 - - Social Security(FICA&Medicare) 49,635 19,390 - - PERA 25,915 19,010 - - Provided Insurance 48,675 52,625 - - Other Benefits(Work Comp,etc) 11,855 735 - - Total Personal Service 784,940 345,200 - - - - Supplies 123,850 4,000 - 1,195 - - Contractural Services 69,000 4,700 - 12,500 - - Utilities 43,000 - - - - - Repairs&Maintenance 25,500 6,000 - 1,800 - - Travel,Training,Dues 10,265 8,500 - - - - Other Expenditures 45,000 2,700 - - - - Miscellaneous - - - - - - Items for Resale 120,300 - - - - - Capital Outlay 150,000 - 60,000 - 1,000,000 7,131,000 Depreciation - - - - - - Admin Fees - - - - - - Debt Service - - - - - - Subtotal before transfers 1,371,855 371,100 60,000 15,495 1,000,000 7,131,000 Transfers Out - - - 185,550 729,000 - Total expenditures 1,371,855 371,100 60,000 201,045 1,729,000 7,131,000 Revenues over(under)expenditures 128,145 1,500 12,500 955 (1,068,849) 915,000 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY,MINNESOTA 2023 Operating Budget Summary-Other Governmental Funds Exhibit A (Internal Service) Total Other EDA Education Municipal Fire Park Vehicle Budgeted Operations Building Building Facilities Facilities Replacement Funds Revenues: Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund 2023 General property taxes-Current $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - General property taxes-Mobile home - - - - - General property tax-Delinq Net - Property tax-Current&Delq Net $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Franchise&other taxes - - - - - - 273,500 Special assessments - - - - - - - Licenses - - - - - - - Permits - - - - - - - Intergovernmental - - - - - - 3,471,000 Charges for services - - - - - - 1,535,550 Fines and penalties - - - - - - - Investment earnings 10,000 1,000 2,900 400 6,600 18,690 192,090 Other Revenues - - - - - 162,000 172,151 Rentals - 157,000 - - - - 157,000 Use of Reserves - - - - - - - Admin Charges to other funds - - - - - 1,647,260 1,647,260 Subtotal before transfers&debt 10,000 158,000 2,900 400 6,600 1,827,950 7,448,551 Debt Issued - - - - - Transfers In - - 65,000 30,000 411,000 - 5,916,550 Total revenues 10,000 158,000 67,900 30,400 417,600 1,827,950 13,365,101 Expenditures: Salaries&Wages 600 902,900 Social Security(FICA&Medicare) 50 69,075 PERA 44,925 Provided Insurance 101,300 Other Benefits(Work Comp,etc) 12,590 Total Personal Service 650 - - - - - 1,130,790 Supplies - 50 - - - - 129,095 Contractural Services 9,000 33,640 - - - - 128,840 Utilities - 22,000 - - - - 65,000 Repairs&Maintenance - 19,450 - - - - 52,750 Travel,Training,Dues 12,500 - - - - - 31,265 Other Expenditures - 8,200 - - - - 55,900 Miscellaneous - - - - - - - Items for Resale - - - - 120,300 Capital Outlay - 45,000 261,000 35,000 254,500 1,274,000 10,210,500 Depreciation - - - - - 1,360,360 1,360,360 Admin Fees - - - - - - - Debt Service - - - - - - - Subtotal before transfers 22,150 128,340 261,000 35,000 254,500 2,634,360 13,284,800 Transfers Out - - - - - - 914,550 Total expenditures 22,150 128,340 261,000 35,000 254,500 2,634,360 14,199,350 Revenues over(under)expenditures (12,150) 29,660 (193,100) (4,600) 163,100 (806,410) (834,249) CITY OF APPLE VALLEY,MINNESOTA 2023 Operating Budget Summary-Enterprise Funds Exhibit A Enterprise Funds Total Water Sports Storm Street Enterprise Liquor &Sewer Arena Drainage Light Cemetery Funds Revenues: Fund Fund Fund Fund Utility Fund 2023 General property taxes-Current $ - $ - $121,000 $ - $ - $121,000 General property taxes-Mobile home $ - - General property tax-Delinq Net - - - - - - Property tax-Current&Delq Net $ - $ - $ 121,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 121,000 Franchise&other taxes - - - - - - - Special assessments - - - - - - - Licenses - - - - - - - Permits - - - - - - - Intergovernmental - - 210,000 320,000 - - 530,000 Charges for services 10,717,000 13,409,000 632,700 2,893,000 668,000 188,000 28,507,700 Fines and penalties - - - - - - - Investment earnings 40,000 126,000 - 10,000 2,000 5,000 183,000 Other Revenues - 135,000 - - - 100 135,100 Rentals - - - - - - - Use of Reserves - - - - - - - Admin Charges to other funds - - - - - - - Subtotal before transfers&debt 10,757,000 13,670,000 963,700 3,223,000 670,000 193,100 29,476,800 Debt Issued - - - 2,000,000 - - 2,000,000 Transfers In - - - - - - - Total revenues 10,757,000 13,670,000 963,700 5,223,000 670,000 193,100 31,476,800 Expenditures: Wages&Salaries 1,130,835 1,655,960 326,060 208,615 3,000 2,100 3,326,570 Social Security(FICA&Medicare) 86,505 126,680 24,670 15,960 - - 253,815 PERA 84,815 120,360 15,405 15,645 - - 236,225 Provided Insurance 122,680 269,565 24,330 14,980 - - 431,555 Other Benefits(Work Comp,etc) 43,280 56,965 9,190 3,640 - 230 113,305 1,468,115 2,229,530 399,655 258,840 3,000 2,330 4,361,470 Supplies 21,800 334,500 29,100 56,925 16,700 14,650 473,675 Contracture!Services 48,025 395,825 38,600 591,635 56,100 38,115 1,168,300 Utilities 57,550 463,400 193,000 78,300 3,100 2,860 798,210 Repairs&Maintenance 43,570 305,700 37,700 58,100 - 1,300 446,370 Travel,Training,Dues 16,380 79,590 7,250 28,015 8,540 11,195 150,970 Other Expenditures 310,500 4,460,965 43,150 39,800 25,000 33,350 4,912,765 Miscellaneous 245,000 71,000 1,000 - - 5,000 322,000 Items for Resale 7,609,070 40,000 9,000 - 460,000 - 8,118,070 Capital Outlay 15,000 2,416,000 100,000 1,780,000 30,000 145,000 4,486,000 Depreciation 151,000 2,900,000 315,000 1,241,000 - 90,000 4,697,000 Admin Fees - 490,000 - 401,000 - - 891,000 Debt Service - 1,113,575 80,000 351,300 - - 1,544,875 Subtotal before transfers 9,986,010 15,300,085 1,253,455 4,884,915 602,440 343,800 32,370,705 Transfers Out 850,000 793,000 - - - - 1,643,000 Total expenditures 10,836,010 16,093,085 1,253,455 4,884,915 602,440 343,800 34,013,705 Revenues over(under)expenditures (79,010) (2,423,085) (289,755) 338,085 67,560 (150,700) (2,536,905) Addback: Principal Portion Debt Service inc above - 885,835 69,850 190,000 - - 1,145,685 Capital outlay above-not an expense 15,000 2,416,000 100,000 1,780,000 30,000 145,000 4,486,000 Less:Bonds Issued - - - (2,000,000) - - (2,000,000) Net Increase(Decrease in Net Assets) (64,010)# 878,750 (119,905) 308,085 97,560 (5,700) 1,094,780 2023 Operating Budget 12-8- I % .... .. ... ..... 40. --Aii ;TT sook ,,..r. - h-r: .4-4111‘ -- -''-: ' .. .. . . ,.... . i _ - r 1541 - ill • 1 ,,,, .. . ... . _ . . J _ oo v.• o J tliey :iii 2023-2024 BUDGET MESSAGE Apple Valley TO: Mayor and City Council Members FROM: Tom Lawell, City Administrator SUBJECT: Preliminary City Budget for 2023 and 2024 DATE: July 20, 2022 I am pleased to present to you the 2023 and 2024 draft recommended budget for the City of Apple Valley. The purpose of this budget document is to help guide our fiscal decisions for the next two- year budget cycle. This document incorporates our core values and the goals and objectives of the City Council into a financial blueprint for success. Many hours have gone into the preparation of this document with a focus on providing the high quality public services that our residents, businesses and visitors have come to expect. We will be spending many hours in the months ahead discussing the details of the budget. Until then, the intent of this memo is to share with you the budgetary highlights and assumptions that went into preparing the document. As always, five tried and true core fiscal principles informed the development of our budget: 1) Focus on the provision of basic City services and fund their provision at adequate levels. 2) Estimate anticipated revenues at realistic levels. 3) Retain adequate reserves to protect against fiscal uncertainty (including uncertainty brought about by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic). 4) Anticipate continued community growth and program capital improvements to serve our growing community. 5) Demonstrate strong stewardship of existing infrastructure and plan for its repair/replacement in a proactive manner. By staying focused on these budgetary principles, our reputation among the financial agencies that monitor and rate governmental entities remains solid. The City has consistently earned the top bond rating possible from not one, but two, bond rating agencies (Moody's Investors Service and Standard and Poor's). This is a clear indication of our financial strength and validates our past financial practices. In fact, having two top bond ratings from two agencies is quite rare— only 10 out of 854 Minnesota cities have earned that distinction. With two top bond ratings in hand, the City of Apple Valley will achieve the lowest possible borrowing costs when it needs to issue bonds in the financial marketplace. Low borrowing costs translate into ongoing savings for all city taxpayers. With a number of large capital facility replacement projects on the horizon, our two AAA bond ratings will be particularly important during this budget cycle. The budget document outlines the investments we intend to make in 2023 and 2024 to remain a highly desirable and fiscally-strong community. This detailed two-year budget affords us the ability to PRELIMINARY BUDGET MESSAGE July 20, 2022 Page 2 better forecast revenue and expenditure trends, especially when coupled with our five-year Capital Improvements Program and our five-year Facilities Capital Improvement Plan. In the pages ahead, the following information will be described: • Summary of important demographic and financial trends being experienced within Apple Valley • Description of the State of Minnesota's current budget environment • Comparison of expenditure patterns with other similar communities • Explanation on how the budget document is organized • Description of the revenue and expenditure trends associated with the General Fund • Summary of the City's various other funds and budget highlights COMMUNITY TRENDS One key community demographic reported annually is population. Typically, the Metropolitan Council releases in April of each year the prior year's population data for all cities in the metropolitan area. The last time the Metropolitan Council reported its data was in April 2022 for population estimates current as of April 2021. According to the Metropolitan Council, the April 2021 population of Apple Valley was 56,155. This compares to the April 2020 U.S. Census estimate of 56,374. The difference between the two numbers is due primarily to changes in various licensed institutional facilities which reduced their occupancy during the pandemic and assumptions made about the occupancy rates in various multi- family buildings. Building permit activity picked up significantly in 2021 compared to 2020. In 2021, the City added over $117.6 million in building permit value, compared to $44.8 million in 2020. The table below shows the permit valuation history in three categories from 2013 through 2021. The 2021 increase shows renewed interest in development activity in the community, despite the lingering pandemic. Building Permit Valuation History 2013-2021 250,000,000 200,000,000 150,000,000 100,000,000 — _ 50,000,000 � RUn. �Ofin �� nilfi��0 i [1O[1 n . I In n 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Residential Commercial -Alterations/Repairs Total PRELIMINARY BUDGET MESSAGE July 20, 2022 Page 3 Construction within the City continues in 2022 at an even quicker pace. Through June 2022, we have issued permits for two single-family homes, 36 townhomes and 98 apartment units at the Applewood Pointe Senior Co-Op. Total residential permit value through June totals $40.7 million. On the commercial/industrial/institutional building side, new permits have been issued for a number of new restaurants and shops in the Orchard Place development along Pilot Knob Road. In addition, the conversion of the old Menards to Eagle Brook Church has also been a significant undertaking. Through June, new commercial/industrial/institutional building permit valuation totals $19 million. Combining all permit activity, including residential alterations and repairs, new permit valuation totals over$76.5 million through June of 2022. Added growth in the community also equates to an expansion of our City owned and maintained utility infrastructure. The City Engineer has updated our utility infrastructure statistics as follows: City Apple Valley Utility Infrastructure Changes from 2021 thru June 2022 Existing As New Additions Total As Of 6-30-21 Through 6-30-22 Of 6-30-22 Sanitary Sewer(miles) 201.32 0.34 201.66 I Force Main (miles) I 3.65 I _ 0 I 3.65 Sanitary Manholes (each) 5,640 14 5,654 Water Main (miles) 251.90 0.84 252.74 Valves (each) 3,958 21 3,979 Hydrants (each) 2,507 9 2,516 Storm Sewer(miles) 176.41 0.42 176.83 Storm Sewer Manholes (each) 8,537 36 8,573 Streets (miles) 183.55 0.37 183.92 Cul de sac (each) 325 0 325 Roundabouts (each) 3 0 3 Water Treatment Plant Capacity 24 0 24 (million gallons per day) Looking ahead to growth for the remainder of 2022 and 2023, additional buildings in the Orchard Place commercial area are anticipated, including a new Lunds & Byerlys Grocery Store, a medical clinic and two flex-industrial buildings. In addition, conversion of the former AMC movie theater parcel to a new Floor & Decor store is on the horizon. Lastly, construction of a new office/warehouse building in the Apple Valley Commerce Center just north of the new Menard's Store on Johnny Cake Ridge Road is also expected. On the residential side, Pulte Homes continues their development of the Orchard Place neighborhood in southeast Apple Valley and United Properties continues their work on the Applewood Pointe Senior Co-Op community. The recently approved Eagle Pointe neighborhood on the site of the former Apple Valley Golf Course property is also anticipated to get underway in the near future. PRELIMINARY BUDGET MESSAGE July 20, 2022 Page 4 Property values in Apple Valley and across Dakota County are determined annually by the Dakota County Assessor's Office. They report the following preliminary valuation trends for Apple Valley comparing 2022 and 2023: Taxable Market Value Comparison by Property Classification Preliminary 2022 to 2023 Payable 2022 Pa able 202 % Change Residential $5,316,165,634 $6,283,858,106 18.20% Commercial/Industrial $599,256,800 $608,905,200 1.61% Utility $12,778,000 $13,087,900 2.43% Agricultural/Rural Vacant $1,265,800 $962,800 -23.94% Cabins $317,200 $366,400 15.51% Apartments $665,633,800 $772,041,900 15.99% Personal Property $31,725,900 $30,989,900 -2.32% Total $6,627,143,834 $7,710,212,206 16.34% Both residential and commercial/industrial property values in Apple Valley continue to increase, but the growth in the residential values far exceeds the growth in commercial/industrial values. This has been the case for many years, but the gap is especially dramatic this year, with residential values increasing at 18.2% and commercial/industrial properties up only 1.61%. Given this disparity, the overall tax burden in 2023 will shift from commercial/industrial properties to residential properties. Dakota County also produces a report that measures the percentage change in estimated market value for residential homestead properties from year to year. Apple Valley experienced a 16.77% increase in median home value from 2021 to 2022. This compares with a 3.18% increase from 2019 to 2020 and a 6.17% increase from 2020 to 2021, so the increase is particularly significant this year. According to the new valuations, 65% of residential properties increased in value between 14% to 20% in one year. The new median residential homestead market value in Apple Valley for 2022 is $353,000, compared to $302,900 in 2021 and $285,300 in 2020. Assessment values from 2022 are used in the calculation of taxes payable in 2023. It is worth noting that the large increase in median residential market values from 2021 to 2022 is not just a phenomenon occurring in Apple Valley. Many other Dakota County cities have experienced similarly large increases as well. THE BUDGET PROCESS AND TIMELINE The timeline for the preparation of the City's 2023 budget follows a timeline established by the State of Minnesota. The first deadline of the budget process this year is September 30, 2022, the date by which the City must adopt its 2023 preliminary property tax levy and preliminary budget. The adoption of the preliminary property tax levy sets the maximum amount permissible. After September 30, the amount may be decreased, but not increased, when the final certified 2023 levy is adopted in December 2022. PRELIMINARY BUDGET MESSAGE July 20, 2022 Page 5 State law requires that we also, by September 30, announce the time and place of a future City Council meeting at which the budget and levy will be discussed and public input allowed, prior to final budget adoption and levy determination. By State law, this public input meeting must occur after November 24 and must not start before 6:00 p.m. By that same September 30 date, the City must provide the County Auditor with the above information, plus a phone number and address where comments and questions about the City's budget can be directed. It is our intent to ask the City Council to consider the adoption of the proposed budget and preliminary levy resolution on September 8. After adoption, we will forward the City's preliminary levy resolution to Dakota County and they will then prepare parcel specific notices to be sent out to all Apple Valley property owners. Per State law, the County will send the parcel-specific notices out between November 11 and November 24. New this year is a statutory requirement that a one-page supplemental statement needs to be included with the parcel-specific notices providing additional comparative information on the taxing jurisdiction's revenues and expenditures and changes proposed from 2022 to 2023. The statement may take the same format as the annual summary budget report for cities and counties issued by the Office of the State Auditor. We are required by State law to adopt our final property tax levy and certify the amount to the County Auditor on or before December 28. Apple Valley City Council meetings in December are scheduled for December 8 and 22. Ideally, we would be able to finalize both the budget and tax levy at our December 8 meeting. STATE BUDGET CONDITIONS AND AID DISTRIBUTION The last formal Budget and Economic Forecast for the State of Minnesota was issued in February 2022. At that time, the report indicated that Minnesota's "budget and economic outlook remains positive", and that "a forecast improvement of $1.507 billion for the current biennium leads to a revised projected general fund surplus of$9.253 billion for FY 2022-23". The Minnesota Department of Revenue issued a July Revenue and Economic Update on July 11, 2022. In that report they indicate that "Minnesota's net general fund receipts for FY2022 are now estimated to total $30.329 billion, $2.927 billion (10.7 percent) more than projected in the February 2022 Budget and Economic Forecast. Net receipts from all major taxes exceeded the forecast. State revenues in the final quarter of FY2022 were $2.260 billion (29.5 percent) more than forecast in February." The July update also includes a paragraph that reads: "Overall,we are seeing some evidence in Minnesota's tax revenues that is consistent with a slowing economy. Also, since February our national forecasters have consistently lowered their expectations for U.S. economic growth in 2022-2025, and they say the risk of a recession beginning in the next 12 months is increasing." The good news is the State of Minnesota has substantial reserves to help it weather the forecasted economic downturn. PRELIMINARY BUDGET MESSAGE July 20, 2022 Page 6 The state budget includes approximately$570 million for the Local Government Aid (LGA) program which provides financial aid to approximately 88 percent of Minnesota cities. Unfortunately, the LGA distribution formula continues to exclude Apple Valley and many other suburban metropolitan cities from receiving any LGA funds. Unlike many other states, the vast majority of cities in Minnesota do not receive sales tax revenue from business transactions that occur within their boundaries. Instead, sales tax receipts are collected by the State and are then re-distributed as the Governor and State Legislature deem appropriate. This redistribution has taken various forms through the years including the abovementioned LGA program, the Homestead and Agricultural Credit Aid (HACA) program, and the Market Value Homestead Credit (MVHC) program. Suburban cities like Apple Valley have steadily been excluded from such programs. In the late 1990s/early 2000s, the City of Apple Valley routinely received approximately $3 million in annual State assistance. The last year Apple Valley received LGA, HACA or MVHC was 2010. The City does receive from the State of Minnesota Municipal State Aid (MSA) funds which help with the maintenance and construction of certain road segments in our community. MSA funds are derived from the state's gas tax and with less driving, lower fuel usage, and the adoption of more electric vehicles in recent years, MSA revenues will be adversely affected over time, unless the State modifies the parameters of the gas tax. Additional information is provided later in this memorandum in the section specific to our Road Improvement Fund. It should be noted that the State of Minnesota through the Department of Revenue does provide various tax relief programs intended to assist individual homeowners and renters. These offerings include the Homestead Credit Refund, the Renter's Property Tax Refund, and the Property Tax Deferral for Senior Citizens programs. Additional information on these programs is available at www.revenue.state.mn.us/property-tax-refund and www.revenue.state.mn.us/property-tax- deferral-senior-citizens. American Rescue Plan Act The federally approved State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds program, which is part of the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA), dedicated $350 billion to helping state, territorial, and local governments respond to the pandemic and its negative economic impacts. Apple Valley has been designated as 1 of 21 entitlement cities in Minnesota and was allocated approximately $5.647 million to be paid half in 2021 and half in 2022. Fund expenditures are governed by specific rules issued by the U.S. Treasury Department and the City will provide to them regular expenditure reports for the life of the program. Under the rules of the program, in April 2022 the City Council approved the acceptance of the funds under the standard allowance for revenue replacement and identified a number of key eligible expenditures as outlined below. PRELIMINARY BUDGET MESSAGE July 20, 2022 Page 7 (Page 7 updated 8-30-22) Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Program Expenditures Purpose Estimated Amount Information Technology: City-Wide Cybersecurity Audit $41,258 Public Safety: Expansion of the Community Impact Unit Service in $429,000 the Police Department Public Safety: Video Storage Hardware and Expanded Storage $140,000 Capabilities Public Safety Infrastructure/Facilities: Police Operational $1,195,000 Support/Garage Facility Public Safety Infrastructure/Facilities: Improvements at Fire Station $526,000 #2/Storm Water Handling Public Works Infrastructure/Facilities: Water Infrastructure Security $450,000 Throughout Water System Public Works Infrastructure/Facilities: Improvements at the Central $1,000,000 Maintenance Facility Public Works Infrastructure/Facilities: Street and Utility $1,500,000 Improvements for 133rd Street Project Public Works Infrastructure/Facilities: North Creek Greenway $366,000 Extension Total $5,647,258 The 2023 and 2024 proposed budget incorporate these adopted priorities. PROPOSED PROPERTY TAX RATE AND LEVY The various components of the approved 2022 and proposed 2023 levy are summarized below. Levy Component 2022 Difference General Fund $24,179,439 $25,514,435 $1,334,996 5.52% Street Maintenance Program 3,801,000 3,971,000 170,000 4.47% Facilities Funds 204,000 381,000 177,000 86.77% Ice Arena Support 121,000 121,000 0 0.00% Property Tax Delinquencies Allowance 50,000 50,000 0 0.00% Debt Service—Voter Approved 1,074,470 1,105,455 30,985 2.88% Debt Service—All Other Levy 395,091 896,110 501,019 126.81% Total $29,825,000 $32,039,000 $2,214,000 7.42% The total levy for 2023 is proposed to be $32,039,000 up 7.42% or$2,214,000 over 2022. At this levy amount, the City's Tax Capacity Rate will be reduced from 38.18% in 2022 to approximately 35.23% in 2023. A median-valued home in Apple Valley valued at $352,800 will see the City's share of their annual property tax bill increase $110 or$9.17 per month. The total City property tax on the median home is projected to increase 9.93% going from $1,164 in 2022 to approximately$1,274 in 2023. PRELIMINARY BUDGET MESSAGE July 20, 2022 Page 8 The above figures should be viewed as estimates at this phase of the budget development process. Final figures will be adjusted as fiscal disparities and tax increment certification amounts become known. Additional details are provided on page 5 of the budget document. As previously noted, 2023 represents a continuation of our multi-year capital facilities improvement program. This program seeks to update aging facilities to accommodate service delivery demands and projected growth. Under this plan, new or renovated facilities are planned for multiple departments including Police, Fire, and Public Works. Funds necessary to support this capital facilities improvement program are raised through the issuance of Capital Improvement Bonds and debt service on these bonds are anticipated to rise from $395,091 in 2022 to $896,110 in 2023 and to $1,393,800 in 2024. The 2023 property tax levy continues the strategy begun in 2013 by increasing the property tax levy to fund the increase in the street maintenance program. The portion of the property tax levy devoted to the street maintenance program is projected to rise from $3,801,000 in 2022 to $3,971,000 in 2023 and $4,360,000 in 2024. The City's decision to fund future road reconstruction projects through the General Fund as opposed to levying special assessments against benefitting properties is unique and farsighted. In essence, the City's property tax rate may be higher than many of our neighboring cities going forward, but our citizens will not need to worry about receiving large, unexpected special assessments for road work in the future. It is important that we routinely remind our citizens of this unique and affordable approach to road reconstruction. COMPARISON OF EXPENDITURE PATTERNS WITH OTHER SIMILAR COMMUNITIES Annually, the Minnesota Office of the State Auditor (OSA) prepares and releases information on the financial performance of cities across the state. The report is based on annual audited financial reports submitted to the OSA by each city. The OSA makes available a City Financial Data Search and Comparison function that allows for an easy comparison amongst jurisdictions. Based on the most recent data provided by the OSA, which is from 2020, Apple Valley compares very favorably in terms of total expenditure per capita. When compared to the 11 major cities within Dakota County, the City of Apple Valley is ranked the #1 lowest in terms of per capita total expenditures. Minnesota Office of the State Auditor 2020 Total Expenditures Per Capita Major Dakota County Cities a City Population Total Expenditures Rank Per Capita Apple Valley 56,374 $806 #1 Farmington 23,632 $825 #2 Eagan 68,855 $920 #3 Rosemount 25,650 $1,077 #4 Inver Grove Heights 35,801 $1,122 #5 Burnsville 64,317 $1,128 #6 Lakeville 69,490 $1,141 #7 Hastings 22,154 $1,192 #8 West St. Paul 20,615 $1,200 #9 South St. Paul 20,759 $1,308 #10 Mendota Heights 11,744 $1,664 #11 PRELIMINARY BUDGET MESSAGE July 20, 2022 Page 9 When compared to the 16 major suburban communities in the seven-county metro area with a population between 40,000 to 100,000, the City of Apple Valley is again ranked the#1 lowest in terms of per capital total expenditures. Minnesota Office of the State Auditor 2020 Total Expenditures Per Capita Major Metropolitan Area Suburban Cities En Total Expenditures City Population Rank Per Capita Apple Valley 56,374 $806 #1 Blaine 70,222 $875 _ #2 Eagan 68,855 $920 #3 Woodbury 75,102 $1,019 #4 Coon Rapids 63,599 $1,027 #5 Eden Prairie 64,198 $1,040 #6 Burnsville 64,317 $1,128 #7 Minnetonka 53,781 $1,136 #8 Lakeville 69,490 $1,141 #9 Shakopee 43,698 $1,177 #10 Brooklyn Park 86,478 $1,200 #11 Edina 53,494 $1,287 #12 Bloomington 89,987 $1,472 #13 Maple Grove 70,253 $1,528 #14 Plymouth 81,026 $1,554 #15 St. Louis Park 50,010 $1,757 #16 BUDGET ORGANIZATION The City currently administers over 74 individual funds in various categories such as general, debt service, capital projects, proprietary and special revenue funds. The draft 2023 and 2024 City Budget includes some, but not all, of these funds. All funds are described in further detail in the City's Annual Comprehensive Financial Report. While each fund is important, the primary fund that affects many of the City's daily operations is the General Fund. The City also operates many proprietary or enterprise functions, which are accounted for in their own funds, such as Water, Sewer, Storm Water, Sport Arenas, Cemetery and Liquor Operations. In addition to the General Fund and proprietary funds, the budget includes a number of other funds: Golf Course, Road Improvement Fund, Equipment Certificate Fund, Future Capital Projects Fund, Cable Television Joint Powers, the Municipal Building Fund, Fire Facilities Fund, Park Facilities Fund, and the Vehicle and Equipment Replacement Fund (VERF), an internal service fund. Notable changes in these non-General Fund accounts are also included in this budget message. PRELIMINARY BUDGET MESSAGE July 20, 2022 Page 10 GENERAL FUND OVERVIEW Revenue Estimates As the largest fund in our financial reporting system, our ability to accurately estimate the yearly revenues of the General Fund is very important. General Fund revenues are depicted in the following pie charts. The first chart shows the various sources of General Fund revenues for 2022.The second chart shows the various sources anticipated in the budget for 2023. We anticipate raising $38,075,425 in General Fund revenue for 2022, which is an increase of 4.8% compared to 2021. Of note, approximately 1.3% of this revenue increase is directly related to increased development activity in the City. The 2022 revenue amount is comprised of a number of revenue sources. Similar to years past, the largest source of revenue for the General Fund is the property tax. The remainder of the General Fund revenue is generated by sources such as licenses, lease income, permits, fees, service charges, park operations, transfers and other revenues. As noted above, the General Fund receives no revenue from State programs, such as Local Government Aid. General Fund Franchise Fees 2022 Adopted Revenues &Other Taxes $38 080 334 1.7/< Licenses& Permits 4.7% Inter- governmental Rev.2.6% Taxes 74.2'h Park&Rec Chgs&Rents 3.8% Other Charges for Services& Rents 4.6% Fines& Transfer , Penalties 0.8% n Admin Char Other &Reserves Revenues 0.9% 6.7% General Fund Franchise Fees 2023 Adopted Revenues &Other Taxes 1.3%, Licenses& $40,432,085 Permits 4.9% g Inter- al � Rev. 3.4%.4%e R Taxes 74.1% Park&Rec Chgs&Rents 3.5% Other Charges for Services& Rents 4.7% \ Fines& `Transfer In, Penalties 0.7% Admin Char s Other &Reserves Revenues 1.0% 6.4% PRELIMINARY BUDGET MESSAGE July 20, 2022 Page 11 Expenditure Estimates Within the General Fund, we can categorize our operations into three broad categories: personnel services, commodities/other and capital outlay. This section briefly describes highlights of each. As the name implies, personnel services accounts for the salaries, insurance costs, mandated withholdings and retirement costs of our most important organizational assets, our employees. Staffing decisions directly affect our ability to deliver customer service and meet expectations. With a growing population and additional development in the community, we need to strategically monitor staffing needs and adjust accordingly. This includes a fair compensation system for both current and new employees. Proposed staffing additions in 2023 and 2024 are as follows: Assistant City Engineer Q1 2023 Funded by Offsetting Revenues Police Investigative/Crime Analyst Q2 2023 From Part-Time to Full-Time Police Officer Q3 2023 Addition to Patrol Staff Mechanic Q4 2024 To Coincide with New Building Central Maintenance Custodian (Part-Time) Q4 2024 To Coincide with New Building In addition, the Police Department is currently in the process of evaluating their command structure to ensure we are appropriately staffed now and into the future. In order to allow our sergeants more opportunity to support officers on the street, we are looking at a modified command model moving from a Police Chief and two Captains to a model comprised of a Police Chief, a Deputy Chief and two Lieutenants. Funds sufficient to move to this new staffing structure are provided in the personnel cost section of the Police budget. Additional information on this intended modified staffing plan will be forthcoming in the months ahead. Commodities/other department expenditures in the General Fund include expenditures for supplies, fuel, consultant fees, repairs, utility costs, training, etc. As you are aware, inflationary pressures in the U.S. recently reached a 40-year high. The proposed 2023 and 2024 budget assumes an easing of inflationary pressures as we approach the new year, but costs will still be higher than the year before. For instance, our fuel cost assumptions in the 2022 budget assumed unleaded at $2.45 per gallon and diesel at $2.75 per gallon. The 2023 budget assumes unleaded will be $3.70 per gallon and diesel will be $4.15 per gallon. Most recently the City paid $3.93 per gallon for unleaded and $4.13 per gallon for diesel fuel. Another example of inflationary pressure is evident in the cost of road salt. In 2021, the City paid $63 per ton for non-treated road salt and $85 per ton for treated road salt. In 2022 those products are now costing the City $82 per ton for non-treated and $110 per ton for treated road salt. Utility costs are also rising. Natural gas costs are up approximately 34% in 2022 compared to 2021. We will need to monitor these costs closely and may need to adjust the budget accordingly during the year. Capital outlay expenditures are for those items deemed more durable and having a life span generally in excess of five years. Because they tend to be more expensive and irregular, the City has adopted strategies to better enable us to plan and execute capital purchases. Specifically, the City has for many years operated with a Vehicle and Equipment Replacement Fund, the Future Capital Projects Fund and Municipal Building Fund to help eliminate major peaks and valleys of the capital cycle and to help ensure that we can adequately cover equipment and facility needs. Starting in 2023, it is proposed that we add two new capital funds, one focused on capital facility replacement needs for the Fire Department and one focused on capital facility replacement needs for the Parks and Recreation Department. All three funds are discussed in below in greater detail. PRELIMINARY BUDGET MESSAGE July 20, 2022 Page 12 A summary of budgeted General Fund expenditures from 2022 to 2023 is as follows: 2022 Adopted 2023 Proposed Difference % Change Personnel Services $23,968,759 $25,636,340 $1,667,581 6.96% Commodities/Other 8,338,995 8,741,645 $402,650 4.83% Capital Outlay 1,767,580 1,702,100 ($65,480) -3.70% Transfer to Road 3,801,000 3,971,000 $170,000 4.47% Improvement Fund Transfer to Facility 204,000 381,000 $177,000 86.76% Improvement Funds General Fund Total $38,080,334 $40,432,085 $2,351,751 6.18% General fund expenses by department are described in detail beginning on page 33 of the budget book. OTHER GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS/ ENTERPRISE FUNDS OVERVIEW The City maintains a number of other funds which are essential to our operations. Beginning on page 253 of your budget book, these various funds are described in detail. Highlights from these various funds are provided below. Future Capital Projects Fund The Future Capital Projects Fund (FCPF) exists to help accumulate funds necessary for the future acquisition, construction or replacement of City capital assets. Currently, the fund is being used to support the City's street reconstruction program and various expenditures through the Municipal Building Fund, the Fire Facilities Fund and Valleywood Golf Course. Details on the FCPF are provided beginning on page 281. Vehicle and Equipment Replacement Fund The Vehicle and Equipment Replacement Fund (VERF) was created in 2014 to provide a funding mechanism for the systematic replacement of vehicles in the City's fleet. The goal of the fund is to have sufficient cash flow to fund annual equipment purchases without the need to borrow through equipment certificates, and to stabilize budgeting for major vehicle and equipment purchases within the general fund. The revenue source for the VERF includes an annual inter-fund charge to the participating departments, proceeds from trade-ins and equipment sales for those items covered by the program, and the addition of interest earnings. All general fund departments are now fully integrated into the VERF program and, as such, each of these departments now see a consistent, annual expense in their budget necessary to incrementally accumulate the funds necessary to fund their future vehicle and equipment replacement costs. Total VERF revenues for 2023 are projected to be $1,827,950 and charges for 2024 are projected to be $1,900,880. The most significant capital purchase planned for 2023 from the VERF is the replacement of two snowplow vehicles. In 2024 the most significant capital purchase planned is a replacement pumper truck for the Fire Department. More information can be found on page 299. PRELIMINARY BUDGET MESSAGE July 20, 2022 Page 13 Municipal Building Fund The Municipal Building Fund provides a funding mechanism for the systematic improvement of municipal buildings and facilities. The goal of the fund is to have sufficient cash flow to fund annual purchases and to stabilize budgeting for these building improvement expenditures. While we are making progress, this goal will require multiple years to achieve. The revenue source for the fund includes an annual transfer from the General Fund and a transfer from the Future Capital Project Fund. The City currently owns in excess of 80 buildings across many departments ranging in size from pump houses to the Municipal Center. As these facilities age, the capital needs associated with the replacement of key building components (such as roofs and mechanical systems) and various site amenities (such as parking lots) will increase. New in 2023 is the proposed creation of two new facilities funds, one for the Fire Department and one for the Parks and Recreation Department. The segregation of these departments from the Municipal Building Fund will move revenues and expenses from the Municipal Building Fund to the two other funds. Both new funds are described below. More information on the Municipal Building Fund can be found on page 303. Fire Facilities Fund The Fire Facilities Fund is a new fund created to provide a financing mechanism for the systematic building improvements to Fire Department facilities. Based on the existing conservative funding estimates, the fund balance will reach a nominal positive fund balance in the next five years. With the upcoming reconstruction of Fire Station #2, the other capital needs for other fire facilities over the next five years are not great, but developing the separate fund with an ongoing revenue source will enable the fund to accumulate funds to address improvements at the stations on a consistent basis. More information can be found on page 307. Park Facilities Fund The Park Facilities Fund is a new fund created to provide a financing mechanism for the systematic building improvements to park facilities. This approach differs from budgeting for individual projects in individual operating budgets, and seeks to avoid large swings in expenditures from year to year. This provides a more stable budgeting approach without the annual volatility in the individual department budgets. The goal of the fund is to have sufficient cash flow to fund annual purchases and to stabilize budgeting for these building improvements. Council is aware that we are planning for a possible Parks Bond Referendum in 2023. As that program is developed, individual projects in the Parks Facility Fund may be adjusted in future years. For more information, see page 311. Road Improvement Fund The Road Improvement Fund provides for a consolidated source of funding for City street improvements. Street improvements under this activity include new street construction, street resurfacing (overlay), pavement preservation (micro surface and seal coating) and traffic signal improvements. This is an area of high importance and significant investment for the City as we seek to proactively maintain the overall pavement condition of our streets. Revenue for the fund is primarily derived from a portion of the property tax levy and is anticipated to be $3,971,000 in 2023 and $4,360,000 in 2024. Other funding sources are transfers from the City's utility funds to cover water, sanitary, storm sewer and street light improvements associated with identified road reconstruction projects, the Future Capital Projects Fund, the Municipal State PRELIMINARY BUDGET MESSAGE July 20, 2022 Page 14 Aid (MSA) contribution derived from the State's motor fuel tax, and revenue from other units of government. In 2023, the Road Improvement Fund identifies approximately $10.2 million in projects including residential street and utility reconstruction in the Walnut Lane/Juniper Lane area and street reconstruction on Hayes Road (140th to 150th), 157th Street (Cedar to Glazier) and 142nd Street (Cedar to Galaxie). Of the $10.2 million total, $2.2 million will be funded by our utility funds. In 2024, the Road Improvement Fund identifies approximately $12.7 million in projects including residential street and utility reconstruction in the Greenleaf 4th Addition and street reconstruction on 152nd Street, 153rd Street, Fortino Street, Founders Lane, Fresco Terrace and Gabella Street (Central Village), 127th Street (Galaxie to Cedar) and Whitney Drive (Garden View to Redwood). Of the $12.7 million total, $3.2 million will be funded by our utility funds. Additional Road Improvement Fund details can be found beginning on page 289. EDA Operations Fund The Apple Valley Economic Development Authority Fund exists to support economic and business development activities as they may arise. For 2023 and 2024, the fund is proposed to support our continued involvement with GREATER MSP, the regional economic development organization that fosters business development within the Twin Cities. In addition, the continuation of the Open for Business program, sponsored by the Dakota County Community Development Authority and the Metropolitan Consortium of Community Developers, is also proposed for both years. Further details are provided on page 285. Municipal Liquor Operation As a retail operation, the City's three liquor stores have adapted and evolved through the pandemic and have continued to strong sales revenue and maintain both impressive gross and net profit margins. According to recent information published by the State Auditor's Office for 2020, the Apple Valley Municipal Liquor Operation ranks fifth in the State in terms of annual gross sales for off-sale liquor stores. In 2020, the operation again surpassed $10 million in sales, ending the year with gross sales of$10,878,000. In 2021, the operation experienced record sales of$11,129,000, mainly due to the impacts of the pandemic which brought about the full or partial closure of many restaurants. Those not able to enjoy alcoholic beverages while dining out patronized liquor stores instead. Now that restaurants have largely reopened, liquor store sales have diminished this year. Through June 2022, overall sales at our stores are down approximately $381,000 for all three stores, which represents a decrease of 7.2% over the same period in 2021. Comparative sales numbers are slowly improving each month, which is a promising sign. Looking ahead to 2023 and 2024, continued residential growth in the community and our surrounding communities will continue to benefit our operations. This is particularly true at Store #3 where most of the new housing development is forecasted to occur. Retail development on the west side of Pilot Knob Road is well underway and the construction of the new Lunds & Byerlys store will draw more customers to the area. Details regarding the liquor operation budget can be found beginning on page 317. PRELIMINARY BUDGET MESSAGE July 20, 2022 Page 15 To the benefit of all taxpayers, our liquor operations also provide a significant transfer to other City funds each year. Recent and proposed expenditures supported by the liquor fund include: Annual Municipal Liquor Store Transfers Support the Community Year Amoun xpenditures Supported by Annual Transfer 2017 $630,000 Fire Command Van, Police Squad Car, Parks Tractor/Snowplow and Parks & Recreation Activities 2018 $630,000 Fire Self Contained Breathing Apparatus, Fire Rescue Response Truck, Three Police Vehicles and Parks& Recreation Activities 2019 $660,000 Fire Thermal Imagers,Three Police Vehicles, 800Mhz Radios and Parks and Recreation Activities 2020 $660,000 Seven Police Vehicles, Fire Dept. Hydraulic Rescue Tools,800Mhz Radios and Parks and Recreation Activities 2021 $680,000 Six Police Vehicles, Fire Dept. Ladder Truck, 800Mhz Radios and Parks and Recreation Activities 2022 $850,000 Five Police Vehicles, Fire Dept. Ladder Truck, 800Mhz Radios, Parks and Proposed Recreation Activities and Valleywood Golf 2023 $850,000 Two Police Vehicles, One Fire Vehicle,Two Snow Plows,800Mhz Radios, Proposed Parks and Recreation Activities and Valleywood Golf 2024 $850,000 Two Police Vehicles, One Fire Dept. Pumper Truck,800Mhz Radios, Parks Proposed and Recreation Activities and Valleywood Golf As our liquor operations prosper, we have been able to increase the amount of the annual transfer to other funds. In fact, by the end of 2024 the total amount of the transfer over the 23-year time period will total over$12.7 million. The history of our recent and proposed Liquor Fund transfers is as follows: Actual and Proposed Annual Transfers from Liquor Fund to Other Funds Totals $12,765,000 Since 2002 I CO <1. 10 l0 CO 01 O N M a O n c0 01 O N M a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N PRELIMINARY BUDGET MESSAGE July 20, 2022 Page 16 Valleywood Golf Course Golf at Valleywood continues to be very popular. Riding a wave of interest in outdoor recreation brought on by the pandemic, golf was quickly identified as a relatively safe outdoor activity and golfers responded enthusiastically by getting out and enjoying the game. Rounds of play at Valleywood Golf Course reached 38,959 in 2021, and all-time record. While we will likely not reach that level of play in 2022, we are still encouraged by the level of interest and improving financial conditions at the course. Through June 2022, the number of rounds played is similar to 2020, another very successful golf year. Looking ahead to 2023 and 2024, we will continue to follow the direction set forth in the adopted 2022-2031 Valleywood Golf Course Strategic Business Plan, which includes these goals: • The course should generate enough operating revenue to cover operating expenses • The course will need $150,000 annually to assist in future capital equipment replacement • The course should be classified as a governmental fund as opposed to an enterprise fund • The course should operate the food operation serving standard golf fare • The course should operate the beverage operation with a full liquor license for golf, events, and banquets • The course should utilize professional caterers to provide food service for events and banquets that utilize the facility • The City should invest to replace the irrigation system, improve the driving range, replace the existing cart paths, install a monument message board sign, and other minor course improvements to help reduce operating expenditures and increase revenue potential. To implement the full recommendations included in the Valleywood Golf Course Strategic Business Plan, various 2022 budget amendments will need to be taken by the City Council by the end of the year. The replacement of the 40+year-old underground irrigation system is a much-needed improvement anticipated to occur in 2023. The installation of the improvement will cause disruption and will negatively impact rounds of play in 2023, but once installed, will provide great benefits in the form of improved course conditions and improved water conservation. As noted above, other course modifications to improve course playability and enhance revenue potential are also anticipated within the same timeframe. A detailed description of the proposed Valleywood budget can be found beginning on page 253. Sport Arenas The City operates two indoor arenas to accommodate ice sports and various dry land activities. The Sports Arena attached to Apple Valley High School is a successful collaboration between the City and ISD 196. The School District pays half of the operating costs associated with the facility. In 2019, the 40+ year old ice refrigeration plant at the Sports Arena was replaced. In 2023 we anticipate replacing the skate sharpener and deteriorating wood and metal doors, and in 2024 we anticipate undertaking exterior brick repair, overhead garage door replacement and electric ice resurfacer battery replacement. The Hayes Ice Arena is an important facility on the Apple Valley Hayes Park campus where youth and adults enjoy year-round ice rental opportunities. For 2023, we anticipate the replacement of various doors and the sound system and in 2024 we plan to replace two overhead garage doors and a compressor. Detailed budget information on the arenas can be found beginning on page 333. PRELIMINARY BUDGET MESSAGE July 20, 2022 Page 17 Cable Television Cable Television services are provided through a joint powers agreement with the Cities of Farmington and Rosemount. There are also certain cable related expenses which are specific to Apple Valley alone. Under our current franchise agreement with Charter Communications, revenues derived from Public, Education, Government (PEG) fees are now restricted to capital items only. As a result, multiple cable-related funds have been established to accurately account for all PEG supported expenditures. One significant capital improvement planned for 2023 is the replacement of aging camera equipment in all three city halls served through our joint powers agreement. These various cable-related funds begin on page 269. Water Utility Fund The multi-year water meter replacement project is nearly complete and residents are enjoying the many benefits of the new system. Meters can be read remotely and the system has already helped to identify potential water leaks in hundreds of homes. Homeowners are quickly notified of the potential leaks which, if repaired, will save them money on their utility bills and help conserve this valuable resource. Residents can monitor their water consumption through our fully implemented customer portal. This represents a significant step in advancing our goals of preserving area groundwater for future generations. Other upcoming projects within the Water Utility Fund include the maintenance of various wells and reservoirs and the extension of fiber to various well sites. In addition,the Water Utility Fund supports water utility costs associated with our annual street reconstruction program. To sustain the operations within this utility, water rates are proposed to increase by five percent in 2023 and 2024. Full details on the Water Utility Fund can be found beginning on page 349. Sanitary Sewer Fund Notable Sanitary Sewer Fund projects in 2022 and 2023 include the replacement of sanitary sewer lines associated with street reconstruction projects in various residential areas and the extension of fiber to various lift stations to improve communications. The City's sanitary sewer system flows to trunk lines that convey the sewage to facilities operated by the Metropolitan Council Environment Services (MCES) utility for treatment. Charges levied by the MCES utility have risen significantly in recent years. Treatment charges in 2022 were $3,387,344. Those charges are expected to rise to$3,761,215 in 2023 and $3,949,000 in 2024. To help sustain operations within this utility, sanitary sewer rates are proposed to increase by five percent in 2023 and 2024. The Sanitary Sewer Fund begins on page 361. Stormwater Utility The City continues to make progress in improving its stormwater management system in accordance with state and federal requirements. This effort includes adherence to State MS4 permit requirements and managing various lakes subject to Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) requirements. To ensure regional coordination, the City also continues to actively participate in both the Blackdog River Watershed District and the Vermillion River Joint Powers Organization. The need to aggressively address stormwater quantity and quality issues is growing and the list of projects on the horizon is long. Given our commitment to environmental stewardship and the growing demands on this utility, stormwater utility water rates are proposed to increase by ten percent in 2023 and 2024. Further details can be found beginning on page 371. PRELIMINARY BUDGET MESSAGE July 20, 2022 Page 18 Street Light Utility This fund accounts for the more than 3,400 streetlights that are in operation within the City. The vast majority of streetlights in the City are owned and maintained by Dakota Electric under a fixed- rate program with the City. The City owns and maintains a number of streetlights in the downtown area, along Cedar Avenue and also on sections of 147th Street and Flagstaff Avenue. In pursuit of greater energy efficiency, the City is incrementally upgrading from inefficient high-pressure sodium streetlights to LED lights which are much more efficient. Street light utility charges are proposed to increase ten percent in 2023 and 2024. Further details can be found beginning on page 381. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS As the last few years has shown, we continue to live in a world of uncertainty. We have been challenged, and I am proud that together, we have risen to meet those challenges. As an organization, we have proven adaptable and resilient and have continued to provide daily, essential services to our residents without interruption. Regardless of the challenges we face, we strive to uphold the core values of our organization, which include: ❖ Excellence and Quality in the Delivery of Services ❖ Fiscal Responsibility ❖ Ethics and Integrity • Fairness • Transparency ❖ Professionalism d• Visionary Leadership and Planning Guided by the City Council and led by an accomplished leadership team, we have applied fiscal discipline and followed prudent fiscal policies that have contributed to our City's financial stability and strength. This 2023 and 2024 budget document seeks to keep us on track for continued community success. I wish to thank our staff for the many additional hours/weekends that were spent working on the 2023 and 2024 budget document. This truly is a team effort involving staff from every department of our organization. Our Department and Division Directors did excellent work. Finance Director Ron Hedberg once again did an outstanding job on the budget this year. A special thanks also goes out to Charles Grawe for his able assistance. We look forward to the opportunity to meet with the City Council in the weeks ahead to provide more information. The first budget review workshop is scheduled for July 28, beginning at 5:30 p.m. There, we will have the chance to present more details on the budget and answer your questions. If you would like to meet prior to then to discuss the budget, please let me know. Respectfully submitted, 170;t° Tom Lawell City Administrator TABLE OF CONTENTS City Administrator Cover Memo Budget and Tax Levy Resolutions 1 Tax Levy History & Taxes Available for General Fund 3 Tax Capacity and Tax Rate Comparison 4 Tax Impacts to Residential Property owners 5 Budget Summary 9 General Fund Revenue Summary 13 General Fund Revenue Detail 14 General Fund Expenditures by Department 21 General Fund Expenditure Summary 22 General Fund Expenditures Subtotals by Department & Expense Category 26 GENERAL FUND PROGRAM DETAILS GENERAL GOVERNMENT Mayor and Council 33 Administration 37 City Clerk 41 Human Resources / Front Desk 47 Information Technology 51 General Government Buildings 57 FINANCE Finance 63 Data Processing 69 Independent Audit 73 LEGAL Legal Services 77 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Community Development 81 Code Enforcement 85 POLICE Police 89 Civil Defense 121 Community Service Officer (CSO) 125 FIRE Fire 129 Fire Relief 137 PUBLIC WORKS Public Works Administration 141 City Engineering 149 Inspections 157 Central Maintenance Facility 165 Street Maintenance 173 Snow & Ice Removal 183 Traffic Signs/Signals/Markers 189 PARK AND RECREATION Park Recreation Administration 195 Park Maintenance 203 Recreation Programs 211 Redwood Pool 215 Recreation Self-Supported Programs 221 Apple Valley Community Center 227 Aquatic Swim Center 233 Apple Valley Senior Center 239 UNALLOCATED Insurance 245 Council Contingency 249 OTHER GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS BUDGETED Golf Fund 253 Cable TV Joint Powers Reserve Fund 269 Cable Capital Equip-PEG 273 Cable Special Revenue-NONPEG 277 Future Capital Projects Fund 281 EDA Operations Fund 285 Road Improvement Fund 289 Education Building Fund 295 VERF (Vehicle & Equipment Replacement Fund) 299 Municipal Building Fund 303 Fire Facilities Fund 307 Park Facilities Fund 311 ENTERPRISE FUNDS Liquor Fund 317 Ice Arena Fund 333 Water Operations 349 Sewer Operations 361 Storm Drainage Utility-Water Quality 371 Street Light Utility 381 Cemetery Fund 385 1 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY RESOLUTION NO. 2023- RESOLUTION ADOPTING 2023 BUDGETS AND TAX LEVY WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the proposed 2023 operating budget on July 28th as set forth in Exhibit A of this resolution; and WHEREAS, the Council desires to adopt the operating budgets for management purposes; and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Statutes require the certification of the Budget and Tax Levy for taxes payable in 2023 by December 28, 2022,to the County Auditor. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Apple Valley that revenue and expenditure budgets for 2023 shall be as noted in Exhibit A of this Resolution and as supported by the detailed document, as revised. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council that the 2023 scheduled levy for the 2013A GO Refunding Bonds is hereby reduced by $70,000 to reflect available resources and current needs to meet the payable 2023 debt service requirements on 2013A GO Refunding Bonds; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council that the following proposed sums of money be levied for the current year, collectible in 2023, upon the taxable property in the City of Apple Valley for the following purposes: General Purposes: $ 25,947,135 Annual Street Maintenance Program 3,971,000 Ice Arena support 121,000 Debt Levy: Market Value Based Debt Levy: GO. Refunding Bonds 2013A 930,000 GO Refunding Bonds 2015B 175,455 1,105,455 Tax Capacity Based Debt Levy: GO. Capital Improvement Bonds 2021B 396,113 GO. Capital Improvement Bonds 2022A 498,297 894,410 $32,039,000 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby instructed to transmit a certified copy of this Resolution to the County Auditor of Dakota County, Minnesota. ADOPTED this 8th day of December,2022. 2 Clint Hooppaw,Mayor ATTEST: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk CERTIFICATE I, Pamela Gackstetter, City Clerk, hereby certify that the above resolution is a true and correct copy of a resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Apple Valley, Dakota County, Minnesota, on the date above indicated. Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk 3 City of Apple Valley Property Tax levy History 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 GENERAL LEVIES General Fund 21,164,055 22,047,895 23,359,336 24,179,439 25,514,435 26,984,645 Municipal Building Fund 186,000 192,000 198,000 204,000 65,000 150,000 Fire Facilities Fund 30,000 40,000 Park Facilities Fund 286,000 355,000 General Levy 21,350,055 22,239,895 23,557,336 24,383,439 25,895,435 27,529,645 Annual Street Maintenance Program 3,437,000 3,540,000 3,664,000 3,801,000 3,971,000 4,360,000 MVHC Provided to Residents-Anticipated Ice Arena Support 121,000 121,000 121,000 121,000 121,000 121,000 Delinquency allowance 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 51,700 50,000 Fire Relief TOTAL GENERAL LEVIES 24,958,055 25,950,895 27,392,336 28,355,439 30,039,135 32,060,645 DEBT LEVIES Equipment Certificates: Equip cert of 2012-$900,000 127,000 128,000 128,000 2014 equip cert 140,000 152,000 - 2015 Equip Cert 2015B 131,145 133,875 - Capital Improvement Bonds 2021 395,091 396,113 393,803 Capital Improvement Bonds 2022 498,297 563,929 Capital Improvement Bonds 2023 500,000 Capital Improvement Bonds 2024 398,145 413,875 128,000 395,091 894,410 1,457,732 General Obligation Bonds(Market Value based) GO Bonds of 2013 A(refunded portions of 2007 8 - 344,650 347,150 344,300 930,000 1,020,000 2013a-2007 Portion 172,650 - - 2013a-2008 Portion 174,770 - - 2015b-2007 Portion 251,475 262,605 273,420 289,170 - - 2015b-2008 Portion 270,480 286,545 307,440 322,560 64,260 - 2015b-2011 Portion 124,425 122,430 120,435 118,440 111,195 114,555 Total G.O.MV Based 993,800 1,016,230 1,048,445 1,074,470 1,105,455 1,134,555 TOTAL DEBT LEVY 1,391,945 1,430,105 1,176,445 1,469,561 1,999,865 2,592,287 TOTAL LEVY 26,350,000 27,381,000 28,568,781 29,825,000 32,039,000 34,652,932 Increase in Net Levy 2.16% 3.91% 4.34% 4.40% 7.42% 8.16% City of Apple Valley Allocation of Total Property Tax levy and Property Taxes Available for General Fund 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total Gross Levy: 26,350,000 27,381,000 28,568,781 29,825,000 32,039,000 34,652,932 Less Delinquency allowance (50,000) (50,000) (50,000) (50,000) (51,700) (50,000) Less MVHC provided to residents - - - - - - Property Tax Levy Available for Operations 26,300,000 27,331,000 28,518,781 29,775,000 31,987,300 34,602,932 Less Amounts allocated to other funds - - - - - - Ice Arena Support (121,000) (121,000) (121,000) (121,000) (121,000) (121,000) Less Amounts for Debt Service Equipment Certificates&Tax Capacity Based Bor (398,145) (413,875) (128,000) (395,091) (894,410) (1,457,732) Market Value based Park Bonds (993,800) (1,016,230) (1,048,445) (1,074,470) (1,105,455) (1,134,555) Amounts of Levy for General Fund 24,787,055 25,779,895 27,221,336 28,184,439 29,866,435 31,889,645 4 City of Apple Valley Tax Capacity& Tax Extension Rate Calculation 2019 FINAL 2020 2021 2022 2023 2023 2023 FINAL 2022(WITH PRELIM 2023 PRELIM 2023 County Updated (prior to County (with County TIF DEC 2023(with Values,TIF&Fiscal TIF Values& Values&Fiscal County TIF Values FINAL 2019 FINAL 2020 Final 2021 Disp.) Fiscal Disp.) Disp.) &Fiscal Disp.) A.REFERENDA Market Value(1000's) 5,781,638 6,175,140 6,467,596 6,757,480 7,772,372 7,767,919 7,766,075 9.13% 6.80% 4.74% -0.27% 15.02% 14.91% 14.93% B.VALUES 1.Value 62,864,517 67,204,293 70,798,289 73,973,648 85,346,751 85,319,305 85,284,670 2.Fiscal Disp Loss (4,548,509) (4,655,980) (4,668,787) (4,986,258) (4,986,258) (4,946,187) (4,946,187) 3.Tax Increment (2,528,210) (2,960,822) (2,938,938) (3,225,397) (3,225,123) (3,205,544) (3,205,544) MV Exclusion 4.RATE VALUE 55,787,798 59,587,491 63,190,564 65,761,993 77,135,370 77,167,574 77,132,939 5.Fiscal Disp Gair 7,682,103 8,220,985 8,733,292 9,535,317 9,535,317 9,815,202 9,815,202 6.Value With FD 63,469,901 67,808,476 71,923,856 75,297,310 86,670,687 86,982,776 86,948,141 C.TAX DOLLARS 1.Fiscal Disp Adjustment 3,262,973 3,255,757 3,386,945 3,641,728 3,641,728 3,747,640 3,747,640 2.HACA Aid 3.City Levy 22,093,227 23,109,013 24,133,380 25,108,802 27,291,817 27,185,905 27,185,905 4.Tax Levies-Gross 25,356,200 26,364,770 27,520,325 28,750,530 30,933,545 30,933,545 30,933,545 D.RATES 1.Fiscal(C1/B5) 42.475% 39.603% 38.782% 38.192% 38.192% 38.182% 38.182% 2.City Levy(C3/B4) 39.602% 38.782% 38.191% 38.181% 35.382% 35.230% 35.246% 0 E.MARKET VALUE DOLLAR/RATE 1.City Dollar Levy 993,800 1,016,230 1,048,455 1,074,470 1,105,455 1,105,455 1,105,455 2.City Rate(E1/A) 0.01719% 0.01646% 0.01621% 0.015900% 0.01422% 0.01423% 0.01423% Tax Capacity Levy 25,356,200 26,364,770 27,520,325 28,750,530 30,933,545 30,933,545 30,933,545 MV Levy 993,800 1,016,230 1,048,455 1,074,470 1,105,455 1,105,455 1,105,455 26,350,000 27,381,000 28,568,780 29,825,000 32,039,000 32,039,000 32,039,000 2.16%I 3.91%I 4.34%I 4.40%I 7.42%I 7.42%I 7.42% tax capacity RECONCILIATION OF TAX DOLLARS GENERATED -Pay 2023 based MV based total total total Tax Dollars Generated 35.246% Target Tax Cap Ext rate 0.014234% total Tax Capacity(excluded TCV contributed to FD pool& 77,132,939 & TIF Captured 7,766,074,718 27,185,905 Gross tax Dollars generated 1,105,455 0 0 28,291,360 Add Fiscal Disparity distribution rec'd from poo 3,747,640 0 0 3,747,640 30,933,545 1,105,455 0 0 32,039,000 Tax Capacity 2023 Prelim CURRENT VERSION CITY OF APPLE VALLEY PRELIM With TIF VALUES and EST.PROPERTY TAXES-PAYABLE 2022 5 Fiscal Disparities from County CITY PORTION OF TAXES ONLY 11/22/2022 TAX IMPACT FOR PROPERTY WITH VALUE INCREASING 16.74%(the median increase for AV) Year 2022 2023 City Change New Market Value New Market Value Exclusion Exclusion 22 to'23 Market Value 302,200 352,800 16.74% Market Value-Exclusion MV (10,042) (5,488) Taxable MV 292,158 347,312 18.88% Tax Capacity 2922 3473 Tax Capacity Rates: City 38.181% 35.246% City Ref. 0.01590% 0.01423% Total Property Taxes: City 1,115.66 1,224.08 108.42 City Ref. 48.05 50.22 2.17 Total 1,163.71 1,274.30 $ 110.59 Operation 9.32% Debt 0.19% Total 9.50% TAX IMPACT FOR PROPERTY WITH VALUE INCREASING 7.59 (=TMV 8.56%incr.) =ZERO TAX INCREASE Approximatley 2.4%of Homes at this level or lower Year 2022 2023 City Change New Market Value New Market Value Exclusion Exclusion 22 TO 23 Market Value 302,200 325,150 7.59% Market Value-Exclusion MV (10,042) (7,977) Taxable MV 292,158 317,174 8.56% Tax Capacity 2922 3172 Tax Capacity Rates: City 38.181% 35.246% City Ref. 0.01590% 0.01423% Total Property Taxes: City 1,115.66 1,117.99 2.33 City Ref. 48.05 46.28 (1.77) Total 1,163.71 1,164.27 $ 0.56 Operation 0.20% Debt -0.15% Total 0.05% TAX IMPACT FOR PROPERTY WITH VALUE INCREASING 19%(=TMV 21.4% incr.) 75%of Homes at this level or lower Year 2022 2023 City Change New Market Value New Market Value Exclusion Exclusion 22 to 23 Market Value 302,200 359,700 19.03% Market Value-Exclusion MV (10,042) (4,867) Taxable MV 292,158 354,833 21.45% Tax Capacity 2922 3548 Tax Capacity Rates: City 38.181% 35.246% City Ref. 0.01590% 0.01423% Total Property Taxes: City 1,115.66 1,250.51 134.85 City Ref. 48.05 51.20 3.15 Total 1,163.71 1,301.71 $ 138.00 Operation 11.59% Debt 0.27% Total 11.86% 6 ••• •••• ••••• ••• AppValley Notes: 7 ••• •••• •••• AppValley ALL FUNDS BUDGET SUMMARY 8 ••• •••• ••••• ••• AppValley Notes: 9 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY,MINNESOTA 2023 Operating Budget Summary Exhibit A Total Other Total Budgeted Subtotal Internal Budgeted General Funds Governmental Service Enterprise Funds Revenues: Fund 2023 Funds Funds Funds 2023 General property taxes-Current $29,866,435 $ - $29,866,435 $ - 121,000 $29,987,435 General property taxes-Mobile home 45,000 - 45,000 - - 45,000 General property tax-Delinq Net 50,000 - 50,000 - - 50,000 Property tax-Current&Delq Net $ 29,961,435 $ - $ 29,961,435 $ - $ 121,000 $30,082,435 Franchise&other taxes 529,000 273,500 802,500 - - 802,500 Special assessments 2,500 - 2,500 - - 2,500 Licenses 215,675 - 215,675 - - 215,675 Permits 1,748,800 - 1,748,800 - - 1,748,800 Intergovernmental 1,368,500 3,471,000 4,839,500 - 530,000 5,369,500 Charges for services 2,438,975 1,535,550 3,974,525 - 28,507,700 32,482,225 Fines and penalties 300,000 - 300,000 - - 300,000 Investment earnings 220,000 173,400 393,400 18,690 183,000 595,090 Other Revenues 181,900 10,151 192,051 162,000 135,100 489,151 Rentals 877,100 157,000 1,034,100 - - 1,034,100 Use of Reserves - - - - - - Admin Charges to other funds 1,095,200 - 1,095,200 1,647,260 - 2,742,460 Subtotal before transfers&debt 38,939,085 5,620,601 44,559,686 1,827,950 29,476,800 75,864,436 Debt Issued - - - 2,000,000 2,000,000 Transfers In 1,493,000 5,916,550 7,409,550 - - 7,409,550 Total revenues 40,432,085 11,537,151 51,969,236 1,827,950 31,476,800 85,273,986 Expenditures: Salaries&Wages 18,965,365 902,900 19,868,265 - 3,326,570 23,194,835 Social Security(FICA&Medicare) 967,305 69,075 1,036,380 - 253,815 1,290,195 PERA 1,986,040 44,925 2,030,965 - 236,225 2,267,190 Provided Insurance 2,564,795 101,300 2,666,095 - 431,555 3,097,650 Other Benefits(Work Comp,etc) 1,152,835 12,590 1,165,425 - 113,305 1,278,730 Total Personal Service 25,636,340 1,130,790 26,767,130 - 4,361,470 31,128,600 Supplies 1,479,730 129,095 1,608,825 - 473,675 2,082,500 Contractural Services 3,769,660 128,840 3,898,500 - 1,168,300 5,066,800 Utilities 577,075 65,000 642,075 - 798,210 1,440,285 Repairs&Maintenance 337,535 52,750 390,285 - 446,370 836,655 Travel,Training,Dues 704,535 31,265 735,800 - 150,970 886,770 Other Expenditures 1,820,110 55,900 1,876,010 - 4,912,765 6,788,775 Miscellaneous - - - - 322,000 322,000 Items for Resale 53,000 120,300 173,300 - 8,118,070 8,291,370 Capital Outlay 1,702,100 8,936,500 10,638,600 1,274,000 4,486,000 16,398,600 Depreciation - - - 1,360,360 4,697,000 6,057,360 Admin Fees - - - - 891,000 891,000 Debt Service - - - - 1,544,875 1,544,875 Subtotal before transfers 36,080,085 10,650,440 46,730,525 2,634,360 32,370,705 81,735,590 Transfers Out 4,352,000 914,550 5,266,550 - 1,643,000 6,909,550 Total expenditures 40,432,085 11,564,990 51,997,075 2,634,360 34,013,705 88,645,140 Revenues over(under)expenditures - (27,839) (27,839) (806,410) (2,536,905) (3,371,154) 10 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY,MINNESOTA 2023 Operating Budget Summary-Other Governmental Funds Other Funds Valleywood Cable TV Cable TV Cable TV Future Road Golf Course Joint Powers Special Rev. Special Rev. Capital Improvement Revenues: Fund Fund PEG Fund Non-PEG Fund Projects Fund General property taxes-Current $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - General property taxes-Mobile home - - - - - General property tax-Delinq Net Property tax-Current&Delq Net $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Franchise&other taxes - - 71,500 202,000 - - Special assessments - - - - - - Licenses - - - - - - Permits - - - - - - Intergovernmental - - - - - 3,471,000 Charges for services 1,350,000 185,550 - - - - Fines and penalties - - - - - - Investment earnings - 1,500 1,000 - 150,000 - Other Revenues - - - - 10,151 - Rentals - - - - - - Use of Reserves - - - - - - Admin Charges to other funds - - - - - - Subtotal before transfers&debt 1,350,000 187,050 72,500 202,000 160,151 3,471,000 Debt Issued - - - - - - Transfers In 150,000 185,550 - - 500,000 4,575,000 Total revenues 1,500,000 372,600 72,500 202,000 660,151 8,046,000 Expenditures: Salaries&Wages 648,860 253,440 - - Social Security(FICA&Medicare) 49,635 19,390 - - PERA 25,915 19,010 - - Provided Insurance 48,675 52,625 - - Other Benefits(Work Comp,etc) 11,855 735 - - Total Personal Service 784,940 345,200 - - - - Supplies 123,850 4,000 - 1,195 - - Contractural Services 69,000 4,700 - 12,500 - - Utilities 43,000 - - - - - Repairs&Maintenance 25,500 6,000 - 1,800 - - Travel,Training,Dues 10,265 8,500 - - - - Other Expenditures 45,000 2,700 - - - - Miscellaneous - - - - - - Items for Resale 120,300 - - - - - Capital Outlay 150,000 - 60,000 - 1,000,000 7,131,000 Depreciation - - - - - - Admin Fees - - - - - - Debt Service - - - - - - Subtotal before transfers 1,371,855 371,100 60,000 15,495 1,000,000 7,131,000 Transfers Out - - - 185,550 729,000 - Total expenditures 1,371,855 371,100 60,000 201,045 1,729,000 7,131,000 Revenues over(under)expenditures 128,145 1,500 12,500 955 (1,068,849) 915,000 11 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY,MINNESOTA 2023 Operating Budget Summary-Other Governmental Funds Exhibit A (Internal Service) Total Other EDA Education Municipal Fire Park Vehicle Budgeted Operations Building Building Facilities Facilities Replacement Funds Revenues: Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund 2023 General property taxes-Current $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - General property taxes-Mobile home - - - - - General property tax-Delinq Net - Property tax-Current&Delq Net $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Franchise&other taxes - - - - - - 273,500 Special assessments - - - - - - - Licenses - - - - - - - Permits - - - - - - - Intergovernmental - - - - - - 3,471,000 Charges for services - - - - - - 1,535,550 Fines and penalties - - - - - - - Investment earnings 10,000 1,000 2,900 400 6,600 18,690 192,090 Other Revenues - - - - - 162,000 172,151 Rentals - 157,000 - - - - 157,000 Use of Reserves - - - - - - - Admin Charges to other funds - - - - - 1,647,260 1,647,260 Subtotal before transfers&debt 10,000 158,000 2,900 400 6,600 1,827,950 7,448,551 Debt Issued - - - - - Transfers In - - 65,000 30,000 411,000 - 5,916,550 Total revenues 10,000 158,000 67,900 30,400 417,600 1,827,950 13,365,101 Expenditures: Salaries&Wages 600 902,900 Social Security(FICA&Medicare) 50 69,075 PERA 44,925 Provided Insurance 101,300 Other Benefits(Work Comp,etc) 12,590 Total Personal Service 650 - - - - - 1,130,790 Supplies - 50 - - - - 129,095 Contractural Services 9,000 33,640 - - - - 128,840 Utilities - 22,000 - - - - 65,000 Repairs&Maintenance - 19,450 - - - - 52,750 Travel,Training,Dues 12,500 - - - - - 31,265 Other Expenditures - 8,200 - - - - 55,900 Miscellaneous - - - - - - - Items for Resale - - - - 120,300 Capital Outlay - 45,000 261,000 35,000 254,500 1,274,000 10,210,500 Depreciation - - - - - 1,360,360 1,360,360 Admin Fees - - - - - - - Debt Service - - - - - - - Subtotal before transfers 22,150 128,340 261,000 35,000 254,500 2,634,360 13,284,800 Transfers Out - - - - - - 914,550 Total expenditures 22,150 128,340 261,000 35,000 254,500 2,634,360 14,199,350 Revenues over(under)expenditures (12,150) 29,660 (193,100) (4,600) 163,100 (806,410) (834,249) 12 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY,MINNESOTA 2023 Operating Budget Summary-Enterprise Funds Exhibit A Enterprise Funds Total Water Sports Storm Street Enterprise Liquor &Sewer Arena Drainage Light Cemetery Funds Revenues: Fund Fund Fund Fund Utility Fund 2023 General property taxes-Current $ - $ - $121,000 $ - $ - $121,000 General property taxes-Mobile home $ - - General property tax-Delinq Net - - - - - - Property tax-Current&Delq Net $ - $ - $ 121,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 121,000 Franchise&other taxes - - - - - - - Special assessments - - - - - - - Licenses - - - - - - - Permits - - - - - - - Intergovernmental - - 210,000 320,000 - - 530,000 Charges for services 10,717,000 13,409,000 632,700 2,893,000 668,000 188,000 28,507,700 Fines and penalties - - - - - - - Investment earnings 40,000 126,000 - 10,000 2,000 5,000 183,000 Other Revenues - 135,000 - - - 100 135,100 Rentals - - - - - - - Use of Reserves - - - - - - - Admin Charges to other funds - - - - - - - Subtotal before transfers&debt 10,757,000 13,670,000 963,700 3,223,000 670,000 193,100 29,476,800 Debt Issued - - - 2,000,000 - - 2,000,000 Transfers In - - - - - - - Total revenues 10,757,000 13,670,000 963,700 5,223,000 670,000 193,100 31,476,800 Expenditures: Wages&Salaries 1,130,835 1,655,960 326,060 208,615 3,000 2,100 3,326,570 Social Security(FICA&Medicare) 86,505 126,680 24,670 15,960 - - 253,815 PERA 84,815 120,360 15,405 15,645 - - 236,225 Provided Insurance 122,680 269,565 24,330 14,980 - - 431,555 Other Benefits(Work Comp,etc) 43,280 56,965 9,190 3,640 - 230 113,305 1,468,115 2,229,530 399,655 258,840 3,000 2,330 4,361,470 Supplies 21,800 334,500 29,100 56,925 16,700 14,650 473,675 Contracture!Services 48,025 395,825 38,600 591,635 56,100 38,115 1,168,300 Utilities 57,550 463,400 193,000 78,300 3,100 2,860 798,210 Repairs&Maintenance 43,570 305,700 37,700 58,100 - 1,300 446,370 Travel,Training,Dues 16,380 79,590 7,250 28,015 8,540 11,195 150,970 Other Expenditures 310,500 4,460,965 43,150 39,800 25,000 33,350 4,912,765 Miscellaneous 245,000 71,000 1,000 - - 5,000 322,000 Items for Resale 7,609,070 40,000 9,000 - 460,000 - 8,118,070 Capital Outlay 15,000 2,416,000 100,000 1,780,000 30,000 145,000 4,486,000 Depreciation 151,000 2,900,000 315,000 1,241,000 - 90,000 4,697,000 Admin Fees - 490,000 - 401,000 - - 891,000 Debt Service - 1,113,575 80,000 351,300 - - 1,544,875 Subtotal before transfers 9,986,010 15,300,085 1,253,455 4,884,915 602,440 343,800 32,370,705 Transfers Out 850,000 793,000 - - - - 1,643,000 Total expenditures 10,836,010 16,093,085 1,253,455 4,884,915 602,440 343,800 34,013,705 Revenues over(under)expenditures (79,010) (2,423,085) (289,755) 338,085 67,560 (150,700) (2,536,905) Addback: Principal Portion Debt Service inc above - 885,835 69,850 190,000 - - 1,145,685 Capital outlay above-not an expense 15,000 2,416,000 100,000 1,780,000 30,000 145,000 4,486,000 Less:Bonds Issued - - - (2,000,000) - - (2,000,000) Net Increase(Decrease in Net Assets) (64,010)# 878,750 (119,905) 308,085 97,560 (5,700) 1,094,780 13 2023/2024 GENERAL FUND REVENUE BUDGET SUMMARY 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual 2021 Adopted 2022 2023 2024 Adopted Proposed Proposed Tax Revenue $ 24,807,028 $ 25,896,930 $ 27,227,192 $ 27,308,336 $ 28,271,439 $ 29,961,435 $ 31,984,645 Other Taxes 100,329 89,547 57,512 96,700 91,700 76,000 76,000 Franchise Fees 515,000 565,000 356,500 565,000 565,000 453,000 425,000 Special Assessments 2,562 10,829 5,442 2,000 2,500 2,500 2,500 Licenses 194,424 172,200 148,433 143,240 174,115 215,675 220,715 Permits 1,396,548 920,751 2,482,782 1,153,850 1,606,750 1,748,800 1,856,250 Intergovernmental Revenue 970,414 5,037,676 1,006,547 874,400 998,500 1,368,500 1,284,100 Charges for Service-Recreation 951,427 128,452 985,122 1,158,600 1,153,500 1,151,000 1,209,000 Charges for Service-General Government 678,651 835,134 781,143 898,810 918,930 1,017,130 1,046,280 Charges for Service-Public Safety 304,259 217,460 200,505 248,100 264,700 270,845 304,910 Rentals Park/Rec Facilities 216,827 101,810 254,117 250,000 276,500 268,000 272,000 Rentals Other 596,198 518,847 597,263 530,400 570,400 609,100 627,500 Fines&Penalties 311,322 169,426 193,805 295,400 300,000 300,000 300,000 Other Revenues 648,925 789,935 38,822 344,975 350,600 401,900 403,300 Admin Charge to other funds 918,100 942,000 969,100 1,036,700 1,065,700 1,095,200 1,143,200 Transfer In 1,367,900 1,385,000 1,426,000 1,427,000 1,470,000 1,493,000 1,567,000 $ 33,979,914 $ 37,780,997 $ 36,730,285 $ 36,333,511 $ 38,080,334 $ 40,432,085 $ 42,722,400 of General Fund Franchise Fees General Fund Franchise Fees 2022 Adopted Revenues &Other Taxes Licenses& 2023 Adopted Revenues &Other Taxes Licenses& $38,080,334 1'7% Permits 4.7% 1'3% Permits 4.9% $40,432,085 111111111) Inter- Inter- �gove.2.6%al governmental Rev.2.6% Rev.3.4 Park&Rec Taxes 74.1% Park&Rec Chgs&Rents Chgs&Rents 3.8% 3.5 Other Charges Other Charges for Services& for Services& Rents 4.6% Rents 4.7% Fines& • \ Penalties 0.8% \ Fines& Transfe In, `Transf Penalties 0.7% Admin Char s Other Admin Cha es Other &Reserves Revenues 0.9% &Reserves Revenues 1.0% 6.7% .` 6.4% 14 2023 GENERAL FUND REVENUE ACCOUNT DETAIL N Account 0 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual QDescription 4010 TAXES-CURRENT AD VALOREM 24,691,632 25,675,224 27,036,725 4011 TAXES-DELINQUENT AD VALOREM 78,979 181,445 144,928 4013 MV HOMESTEAD CREDIT REVENUE - 4017 EXCESS TIF - 4014 TAXES-MOBILE HOME 36,417 40,261 45,539 Tax Revenue 24,807,028 25,896,930 27,227,192 4015 PILOT-AUGUSTANA/LIFEWORKS 49,710 53,303 27,882 4020 GRAVEL TAX 50,619 36,244 29,630 Other Taxes 100,329 89,547 57,512 5335 CABLE FRANCHISE FEE 515,000 565,000 356,500 Franchise Fees 515,000 565,000 356,500 5045 ASSESSMENT NEW LEVY COLL BY AV - - 5055 SA COLL BY DAK CTY-CURRENT 1,896 8,207 2,047 5056 SA COLL BY DAK CTY-DELINQUENT - 3,143 5078 ESCROW PROJECT COSTS - 1,809 - 5059 SA MOWING/SNOW/FALSE ALARMS 666 628 5058 SA PEN&INT COLL BY DAK CTY - 185 252 Special Assessments 2,562 10,829 5,442 4030 LICENSE-TOBACCO 11,539 510 11,952 4031 LICENSE-TRASH COLLECTION 4,700 7,935 5,615 4032 LICENSE-DOG(public safety) 8,055 7,700 7,200 4032 LICENSE-KENNEL - - - 4033 LICENSE-FUEL 13,580 10,860 8,166 4034 LICENSE-LIQUOR/WINE 111,000 115,035 85,460 4035 LICENSE-BEER ON&OFF 24,160 2,400 7,000 4036 LICENSE-TRANSIENT MERCHANT 10,790 16,500 10,330 4037 LICENSE-VENDING MACHINES 1,965 1,800 - 4038 LICENSE-MASSAGE THERAPY 5,113 2,927 3,492 4049 LICENSE-OTHER 3,522 6,533 9,218 Licenses 194,424 172,200 148,433 4060 PERMIT-BUILDING PERMIT 615,380 407,186 1,344,604 4061 PERMIT-GRADING 6,854 5,196 12,830 4062 PERMIT-GRAVEL OPERATION 10,932 11,107 11,236 4063 PERMIT-HEATING 122,915 76,191 179,512 4065 PERMIT-PLUMBING 125,115 97,892 226,805 4066 PERMIT-SIGNS&BILLBOARDS 10,048 12,759 13,672 4067 PERMIT-UTILITY INSTALLATION - - - 4070 PERMIT-SP INSP/REINSP FEE 6,442 11,267 8,890 4071 TEMP CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY - 4072 STATE SURTAX COLLECTED 69 2,167 4,719 4073 PERMIT-BUILDING PLAN REVIEW 250,405 88,601 355,309 4074 PERMIT FEES-ROW 29,190 80,654 70,872 4075 PERMIT-FIRE ALRM/SPRINKLER 20,837 10,161 41,909 4076 PERMIT SMALL CELL-ENGINEERING 1,050 - 350 4077 PERMIT SMALL CELL-INSPECTIONS 450 - 775 4078 PERMIT FIREWORKS 1,525 1,000 4079 PERMIT FIRE ALARM INSPECTIONS 21,038 3,055 9,599 4099 PERMIT-OTHER 650 364 821 4911 WATER SERVICE PERMIT 972 303 1,758 4915 SEWER SERVICE PERMIT 1,798 1,719 2,941 4924 ELECTRICAL INSPECTION PERMIT 170,878 112,129 195,180 4923 COMMCL WTR/SWR PERMIT - Permits 1,396,548 920,751 2,482,782 15 2023 GENERAL FUND REVENUE ACCOUNT DETAIL (continued) d 3 Account 2023 Budget 2024 Budget . u 2021 Adopted 2022 Adopted O Q Description Request Request 4010 TAXES-CURRENT AD VALOREM 27,221,336 28,184,439 29,866,435 31,889,645 4011 TAXES-DELINQUENT AD VALOREM 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 4013 MV HOMESTEAD CREDIT REVENUE - - 4017 EXCESS TIF - - 4014 TAXES-MOBILE HOME 37,000 37,000 45,000 45,000 Tax Revenue 27,308,336 28,271,439 29,961,435 31,984,645 4015 PILOT-AUGUSTANA/LIFEWORKS 50,700 45,700 30,000 30,000 4020 GRAVEL TAX 46,000 46,000 46,000 46,000 Other Taxes 96,700 91,700 76,000 76,000 5335 CABLE FRANCHISE FEE 565,000 565,000 453,000 425,000 Franchise Fees 565,000 565,000 453,000 425,000 5045 ASSESSMENT NEW LEVY COLL BY AV - - 5055 SA COLL BY DAK CTY-CURRENT 2,000 2,500 2,500 2,500 5056 SA COLL BY DAK CTY-DELINQUENT - - - - 5078 ESCROW PROJECT COSTS - - - - 5059 SA MOWING/SNOW/FALSE ALARMS - - 5058 SA PEN&INT COLL BY DAK CTY - - - - Special Assessments 2,000 2,500 2,500 2,500 4030 LICENSE-TOBACCO 5,865 5,865 6,100 6,100 4031 LICENSE-TRASH COLLECTION 6,475 6,500 5,650 5,665 4032 LICENSE-DOG(public safety) 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 4032 LICENSE-KENNEL - - - - 4033 LICENSE-FUEL 13,150 14,050 13,800 13,900 4034 LICENSE-LIQUOR/WINE 88,000 120,000 158,950 162,960 4035 LICENSE-BEER ON&OFF 5,150 4,900 4,900 4,900 4036 LICENSE-TRANSIENT MERCHANT 11,500 8,100 10,575 11,440 4037 LICENSE-VENDING MACHINES 1,100 - - - 4038 LICENSE-MASSAGE THERAPY 1,000 3,400 3,250 3,300 4049 LICENSE-OTHER 2,000 2,300 3,450 3,450 Licenses 143,240 174,115 215,675 220,715 4060 PERMIT-BUILDING PERMIT 520,000 900,000 965,000 965,000 4061 PERMIT-GRADING 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,500 4062 PERMIT-GRAVEL OPERATION 11,900 11,900 11,900 11,900 4063 PERMIT-HEATING 92,000 92,000 92,000 110,000 4065 PERMIT-PLUMBING 127,000 140,000 140,000 140,000 4066 PERMIT-SIGNS&BILLBOARDS 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 4067 PERMIT-UTILITY INSTALLATION 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,000 4070 PERMIT-SP INSP/REINSP FEE - - 5,000 5,000 4071 TEMP CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY - - - - 4072 STATE SURTAX COLLECTED - - - - 4073 PERMIT-BUILDING PLAN REVIEW 231,000 262,000 297,000 385,000 4074 PERMIT FEES-ROW 7,500 12,500 50,000 50,000 4075 PERMIT-FIRE ALRM/SPRINKLER 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 4076 PERMIT SMALL CELL-ENGINEERING 7,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 4077 PERMIT SMALL CELL-INSPECTIONS 450 300 300 300 4078 PERMIT FIREWORKS - 1,500 550 1,500 4079 PERMIT FIRE ALARM INSPECTIONS 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 4099 PERMIT-OTHER 500 550 550 550 4911 WATER SERVICE PERMIT - - - - 4915 SEWER SERVICE PERMIT - - - - 4924 ELECTRICAL INSPECTION PERMIT 93,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 4923 COMMCL WTR/SWR PERMIT - - - - Permits 1,153,850 1,606,750 1,748,800 1,856,250 16 2023 GENERAL FUND REVENUE ACCOUNT DETAIL N Account 0 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual QDescription State Categorical Revenues 4130 AID-FIRE 311,652 330,195 347,326 4140 AID-STATE POLICE PERA 462,557 489,879 473,417 4150 GRANTS-OTHER-Public Works/Nat Resources - - - 4142 STATE GRANTS-OTHER-Fire MBFTE Training 38,843 15,623 38,136 813,052 835,697 858,879 State Non-Categorical Revenues 4110 STATE GRANTS(PERA&Perf Measurement) 44,127 9,210 22,467 4120 AID-LOCAL GOVERNMENT - - - 44,127 9,210 22,467 Other Non State Revenues 4143 FED GRANT-POLICE 25,200 - - 4144 FED GRANT-FIRE - - - 4141 GRANTS-OTHER-Misc Pub Safety 36,298 18,088 84,460 4141 FEES-POST BOARD REIMB CONTINUING ED 50,703 47,045 - 4144 FED GRANT-Fire-Training officer - - - 4145 FED GRANTS-OTHER(CARES,ARPA,CDBG) 4,111,636 24,741 4150 GRANTS-OTHER-Recreation - - - 4150 GRANTS-OTHER-Police 1,034 16,000 16,000 Intergovernmental Revenue 970,414 5,037,676 1,006,547 4310 REDWOOD PUBLIC SWIMMING 33,532 (232) 24,683 4311 REDWOOD SWIMMING LESSONS 16,383 64 19,112 4312 REDWOOD CONCESSIONS 4,295 - 5,414 4313 REDWOOD RENTALS 480 - 14,402 4330 SWIM CENTER REVENUE 489,854 (3,282) 602,785 4331 SWIM CENTER CONCESSION 97,007 - 126,244 4350 SUMMER PLAYGROUND ACTIVITIES 13,946 3,127 11,381 4351 PRE SCHOOL PROGRAMS 61,245 23,246 28,860 4352 TEEN PROGRAMS - - - 4355 RECREATION USER FEES 57,706 20,080 32,335 4356 RECREATION LEAGUE ENTRY FEES 140,492 80,827 107,747 4357 JCRP CONCESSIONS 8,131 - - 4358 VENDING COMMISSIONS 834 704 316 4359 REC SENIOR REVENUE-REIMB (346) (765) - 4360 REC-SENIOR PROGRAM REVENUE 27,247 4,506 7,275 4224 CHGS FOR SERV-PK/REC OT REIMB - - 4362 SENIOR CENTER CATERER COMMISSION 621 177 4,568 4361 QUARRY POINT CONCESSIONS - - - Charges for Service-Recreation 951,427 128,452 985,122 4210 FEES-ELECTION FILING 25 280 - 4211 FEES-MAP SALES 175 211 20 4212 FEES-ASSESSMENT SEARCHES 25 - - 4213 FEES-BOOK SALES - - - 4214 FEES-PLAT 3,359 10,367 6,067 4215 FEES-SPECIAL USE 325 40 829 4216 FEES-REZONING 7,410 4,680 5,723 4217 FEES-INSPECTIONS NAT RESOURCES 11,172 9,127 14,540 4218 FEES-CODE ENFORCEMENT 1,650 1,300 1,000 4219 FEES-ENGINEERING 646,561 803,857 737,867 4220 FEES-PROJECT PLANS - - - 4224 FEES CHG PARK/REC OT REIMBURSEMENT 4,561 - - 4226 FEES-CHG FOR SERVICE-PUBLIC SAFETY - - 4229 FEES-CONDUIT DEBT FEE - - - 4229 FEES-OTHER 3,388 5,272 15,097 Charges for Service-General Government 678,651 835,134 781,143 17 2023 GENERAL FUND REVENUE ACCOUNT DETAIL (continued) d 3 Account 2023 Budget 2024 Budget . u 2021 Adopted 2022 Adopted O Q Description Request Request State Categorical Revenues 4130 AID-FIRE 295,000 330,000 351,000 356,000 4140 AID-STATE POLICE PERA 465,000 500,000 515,000 530,000 4150 GRANTS-OTHER-Public Works/Nat Resources - - 138,000 - 4142 STATE GRANTS-OTHER-Fire MBFTE Training 24,000 18,000 24,000 18,000 784,000 848,000 1,028,000 904,000 State Non-Categorical Revenues 4110 STATE GRANTS(PERA&Perf Measurement) 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 4120 AID-LOCAL GOVERNMENT - - 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 Other Non State Revenues 4143 FED GRANT-POLICE - - - - 4144 FED GRANT-FIRE - - 4141 GRANTS-OTHER-Misc Pub Safety 66,900 70,000 86,000 96,000 4141 FEES-POST BOARD REIMB CONTINUING ED 16,000 16,000 4144 FED GRANT-Fire-Training officer - - 4145 FED GRANTS-OTHER(CARES,ARPA,CDBG) 57,000 208,000 222,800 4150 GRANTS-OTHER-Recreation - - - - 4150 GRANTS-OTHER-Police - - 39,000 53,800 Intergovernmental Revenue 874,400 998,500 1,368,500 1,284,100 4310 REDWOOD PUBLIC SWIMMING 33,000 33,000 33,500 36,000 4311 REDWOOD SWIMMING LESSONS 20,600 21,000 22,000 24,000 4312 REDWOOD CONCESSIONS 8,000 5,000 6,000 6,500 4313 REDWOOD RENTALS 500 15,000 18,000 20,000 4330 SWIM CENTER REVENUE 639,000 668,000 674,000 715,000 4331 SWIM CENTER CONCESSION 110,000 110,000 120,000 125,000 4350 SUMMER PLAYGROUND ACTIVITIES 17,500 18,000 16,000 16,000 4351 PRE SCHOOL PROGRAMS 45,000 50,000 50,000 55,000 4352 TEEN PROGRAMS - - - - 4355 RECREATION USER FEES 79,000 60,000 50,000 45,000 4356 RECREATION LEAGUE ENTRY FEES 163,000 140,000 130,000 135,000 4357 JCRP CONCESSIONS 9,000 - - - 4358 VENDING COMMISSIONS 3,000 3,000 1,000 1,000 4359 REC SENIOR REVENUE-REIMB 1,000 1,000 - - 4360 REC-SENIOR PROGRAM REVENUE 29,500 29,000 30,000 30,000 4224 CHGS FOR SERV-PK/REC OT REIMB - - - - 4362 SENIOR CENTER CATERER COMMISSION 500 500 500 500 4361 QUARRY POINT CONCESSIONS - - - - Charges for Service-Recreation 1,158,600 1,153,500 1,151,000 1,209,000 4210 FEES-ELECTION FILING - 120 - 50 4211 FEES-MAP SALES 1,180 1,180 1,300 1,400 4212 FEES-ASSESSMENT SEARCHES - - - - 4213 FEES-BOOK SALES - - 4214 FEES-PLAT 8,400 8,400 8,400 8,400 4215 FEES-SPECIAL USE 2,430 2,430 2,430 2,430 4216 FEES-REZONING 8,400 8,400 8,400 8,400 4217 FEES-INSPECTIONS NAT RESOURCES 15,800 15,800 10,000 10,000 4218 FEES-CODE ENFORCEMENT 2,100 2,100 2,100 2,100 4219 FEES-ENGINEERING 850,000 870,000 974,000 1,003,000 4220 FEES-PROJECT PLANS - - 4224 FEES CHG PARK/REC OT REIMBURSEMENT - - 4226 FEES-CHG FOR SERVICE-PUBLIC SAFETY - - - 4229 FEES-CONDUIT DEBT FEE - - 4229 FEES-OTHER 10,500 10,500 10,500 10,500 Charges for Service-General Government 898,810 918,930 1,017,130 1,046,280 18 2023 GENERAL FUND REVENUE ACCOUNT DETAIL N Account 0 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual QDescription 4250 FEES-ACCIDENT REPORT 365 215 140 4251 FEES-ANIMAL PICKUP 4,182 2,045 1,649 4253 FEES-FIRE ALARM PANELS 1,075 1,724 661 4259 FEES-OTHER PUBLIC SAFETY 9,470 6,504 3,182 4259 FEES-DARE,LIASON OFFICER 164,331 167,618 136,775 4226 FEES-OTHER PUBLIC SAFETY - - - 5345 REIMBURSE POLICE SPEC DETAIL 124,836 39,354 58,098 Charges for Service-Public Safety 304,259 217,460 200,505 5110 RENTS-REDWOOD - 8,570 21,702 5112 RENTS-HAYES - - - 5115 RENTS-APPLE VALLEY COMM CENTER 77,170 37,642 61,370 5116 RENTS-HAYES COMM&SENIOR CTR 55,331 9,685 41,158 5120 RENTS-SWIM CENTER 6,999 1,587 - 5125 RENTS-JOHNNY CAKE RIDGE PARK 160 - - 5126 RENTS-FIELDS 68,063 38,310 129,887 5130 RENTS-JCRP ACTIVITY CENTER - - - 5130 RENTS-JCRP ACTIVITY CENTER 1,603 490 - 5199 RENTS-OTHER 7,501 5,526 - Rentals Park/Rec Facilities 216,827 101,810 254,117 5197 RENTS-OTHER-Allina Fire Hall Lease 34,587 36,859 38,388 5195 RENTS-STREETS - - - 5210 ANTENNA LEASE 561,986 481,988 545,025 5211 ANTENNA REVIEWS/INSPECTIONS (375) - - 5215 ANTENNA LEASE-ESCROWS - - - 5199 RENTS-OTHER - - 13,850 5199 RENTS-OTHER - - - Rentals Other 596,198 518,847 597,263 4270 COURT FINES 308,260 169,426 179,585 4276 SUBPOENA FEES 2,975 - 20 4275 PENALTIES 87 - 14,200 Fines&Penalties 311,322 169,426 193,805 8205 SALE OF PROPERTY 9,688 - 55,751 5010 INVESTMENT INTEREST 511,146 645,838 (136,601) 5310 CONTRIBUTIONS&DONATIONS 4,280 3,668 654 5320 POP MACHINE_CITY HALL - - - 5321 POP MACHINE-CMF - - - 5322 WASTE OIL - - - 5330 FORESTERY REVENUE - - - 5340 REFUNDS&REIMBURSEMENTS-General Gov - 49,467 - 5340 REFUNDS&REIMBURSEMENTS-Recreation(JCRP) 59,599 47,011 57,836 5340 REFUNDS&REIMBURSEMENTS-Public Works - - - 5340 REFUNDS&REIMBURSEMENTS-Public Safety 900 - - 5399 OTHER MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 63,312 43,951 61,182 Other Revenues 648,925 789,935 38,822 5396 ADMIN CHG-SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FUNDS - - - 5395 ADMIN CHG-UTILITY FUNDS 794,100 817,000 841,600 5397 ADMIN CHG-INVESTMENT FUND 124,000 125,000 127,500 5499 ADMIN CHG-LIQUOR FUND - - - Admin Charge to other funds 918,100 942,000 969,100 5410 FROM LIQUOR FUND 660,000 660,000 680,000 5415 TRANSFER FROM WATER&SEWER FUND 705,000 725,000 746,000 5425 FROM OTHER FUNDS 2,900 - - Transfer In 1,367,900 1,385,000 1,426,000 Grand Total-General Fund 33,979,914 37,780,997 36,730,285 19 2023 GENERAL FUND REVENUE ACCOUNT DETAIL (continued) d 3 Account 2023 Budget 2024 Budget . u 2021 Adopted 2022 Adopted .raO Q Description Request Request 4250 FEES-ACCIDENT REPORT 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 4251 FEES-ANIMAL PICKUP 5,100 5,100 5,100 5,100 4253 FEES-FIRE ALARM PANELS 1,000 1,500 1,500 1,500 4259 FEES-OTHER PUBLIC SAFETY 10,200 10,200 10,200 10,200 4259 FEES-DARE,LIASON OFFICER 163,600 166,700 183,045 212,110 4226 FEES-OTHER PUBLIC SAFETY 10,200 10,200 5345 REIMBURSE POLICE SPEC DETAIL 57,000 70,000 70,000 75,000 Charges for Service-Public Safety 248,100 264,700 270,845 304,910 5110 RENTS-REDWOOD - 24,500 - - 5112 RENTS-HAYES - - - 5115 RENTS-APPLE VALLEY COMM CENTER 81,000 81,000 75,000 75,000 5116 RENTS-HAYES COMM&SENIOR CTR 70,000 70,000 60,000 60,000 5120 RENTS-SWIM CENTER 15,000 15,000 15,000 17,000 5125 RENTS-JOHNNY CAKE RIDGE PARK - - - 5126 RENTS-FIELDS 70,000 75,000 90,000 92,000 5130 RENTS-JCRP ACTIVITY CENTER - - - - 5130 RENTS-JCRP ACTIVITY CENTER 7,000 1,000 28,000 28,000 5199 RENTS-OTHER 7,000 10,000 - - Rentals Park/Rec Facilities 250,000 276,500 268,000 272,000 5197 RENTS-OTHER-Allina Fire Hall Lease 39,400 39,400 43,100 44,500 5195 RENTS-STREETS - - 5210 ANTENNA LEASE 491,000 531,000 551,000 568,000 5211 ANTENNA REVIEWS/INSPECTIONS - 5215 ANTENNA LEASE-ESCROWS - - 5199 RENTS-OTHER - 15,000 15,000 5199 RENTS-OTHER - - Rentals Other 530,400 570,400 609,100 627,500 4270 COURT FINES 295,400 300,000 300,000 300,000 4276 SUBPOENA FEES - - 4275 PENALTIES - - - - Fines&Penalties 295,400 300,000 300,000 300,000 8205 SALE OF PROPERTY 24,000 22,000 47,300 48,700 5010 INVESTMENT INTEREST 205,000 205,000 220,000 220,000 5310 CONTRIBUTIONS&DONATIONS - 3,000 3,000 3,000 5320 POP MACHINE_CITY HALL - - - - 5321 POP MACHINE-CMF 600 600 600 600 5322 WASTE OIL - - - - 5330 FORESTERY REVENUE - - 5340 REFUNDS&REIMBURSEMENTS-General Gov - - 5340 REFUNDS&REIMBURSEMENTS-Recreation(JCRP) 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 5340 REFUNDS&REIMBURSEMENTS-Public Works - - 5340 REFUNDS&REIMBURSEMENTS-Public Safety - - 5399 OTHER MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 40,375 45,000 56,000 56,000 Other Revenues 344,975 350,600 401,900 403,300 5396 ADMIN CHG-SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FUNDS 69,200 69,200 69,200 69,200 5395 ADMIN CHG-UTILITY FUNDS 840,000 865,500 891,000 935,000 5397 ADMIN CHG-INVESTMENT FUND 127,500 131,000 135,000 139,000 5499 ADMIN CHG-LIQUOR FUND - - - - Admin Charge to other funds 1,036,700 1,065,700 1,095,200 1,143,200 5410 FROM LIQUOR FUND 680,000 700,000 700,000 735,000 5415 TRANSFER FROM WATER&SEWER FUND 747,000 770,000 793,000 832,000 5425 FROM OTHER FUNDS - - Transfer In 1,427,000 1,470,000 1,493,000 1,567,000 Grand Total-General Fund 36,333,511 38,080,334 40,432,085 42,722,400 20 ... .... ..... ..• AppValley Notes: 21 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023-2024 GENERAL FUND SUMMARY TOTAL EXPENSES BY DEPARTMENT 2021 Council 2022 Council 2024 2023 Dept 2023 2024 Dept Department 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted Admin Admin Onainal Onainal Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend 01-MAYOR&CITY COUNCIL 142,892 139,950 129,660 157,995 144,900 151,135 151,135 158,130 158,130 02-ADMINISTRATION 483,938 499,582 591,924 614,435 670,095 712,630 712,630 751,790 751,790 03-CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS 293,978 475,960 322,314 336,295 522,505 458,055 458,055 624,810 636,410 04-HUMAN RESOURCES/FRONT DESK 572,562 587,517 606,411 648,970 666,260 685,795 681,045 704,980 704,980 05-INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 951,036 824,315 971,048 1,122,545 1,290,824 1,270,045 1,265,900 1,313,300 1,313,300 16-GENERAL GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS 395,732 499,845 398,692 391,595 376,845 444,340 444,340 458,235 458,235 2,840,138 3,027,169 3,020,048 3,271,835 3,671,429 3,722,000 3,713,105 4,011,245 4,022,845 08-FINANCE 685,901 767,654 738,176 727,395 800,635 776,640 772,020 865,165 860,545 09-DATA PROCESSING 253,773 263,097 265,311 259,178 278,755 294,735 294,735 312,575 312,575 10-INDEPENDENT AUDIT 12,685 12,085 18,361 17,195 16,800 17,200 17,200 17,500 17,500 952,358 1,042,836 1,021,848 1,003,768 1,096,190 1,088,575 1,083,955 1,195,240 1,190,620 14-LEGAL SERVICES 545,824 547,589 583,041 553,000 579,344 595,950 595,950 613,310 613,310 545,824 547,589 583,041 553,000 579,344 595,950 595,950 613,310 613,310 15-COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 709,051 696,289 777,604 738,955 749,470 778,870 769,315 806,120 801,750 06-CODE ENFORCEMENT 224,429 262,356 218,057 321,210 346,945 364,230 363,230 381,550 380,550 933,480 958,646 995,661 1,060,165 1,096,415 1,143,100 1,132,545 1,187,670 1,182,300 20-POLICE 9,774,536 10,209,278 10,320,857 10,584,650 10,968,725 11,887,185 11,753,240 12,580,970 12,340,970 21-CIVIL DEFENSE 18,927 19,680 30,488 20,926 24,350 48,300 48,300 48,500 48,500 22-COMM SERV OFFICER(CSO) 54,343 65,647 91,485 112,255 127,210 139,435 139,435 146,790 146,790 9,847,806 10,294,605 10,442,830 10,717,831 11,120,285 12,074,920 11,940,975 12,776,260 12,536,260 23-FIRE 1,958,570 2,012,172 2,196,999 2,211,059 2,275,527 2,388,035 2,359,035 2,482,635 2,478,635 76-FIRE RELIEF 567,625 587,212 624,963 572,887 626,375 657,995 660,745 665,000 667,750 2,526,195 2,599,384 2,821,962 2,783,946 2,901,902 3,046,030 3,019,780 3,147,635 3,146,385 27-PW ENGINEERING 758,327 822,232 865,010 972,015 968,040 1,184,625 1,187,100 1,208,285 1,208,460 28-BUILDING INSPECTIONS 885,188 928,879 873,362 850,620 953,780 1,034,735 1,034,735 1,078,660 1,078,660 29-PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN/NATURAL RES 657,937 564,318 735,878 776,365 752,335 1,013,565 1,013,365 889,430 889,230 30-CMF-FLEET&BUILDINGS 746,894 783,434 806,122 845,495 858,184 996,075 959,905 1,154,200 1,081,850 31-STREET MAINTENANCE 2,089,303 2,090,262 2,226,102 2,581,625 2,822,970 2,913,570 2,882,470 3,036,615 2,955,190 32-SNOW&ICE REMOVAL 559,499 356,783 314,271 412,606 412,523 438,485 438,485 457,125 457,125 33-TRAFFIC SIGNS/SIGNALS/MARKERS 211,405 209,863 197,106 229,480 257,095 268,465 258,465 319,005 285,005 5,908,552 5,755,771 6,017,850 6,668,206 7,024,927 7,849,520 7,774,525 8,143,320 7,955,520 37-PARK/RECREATION ADMINISTRATION 982,734 917,437 1,052,513 1,019,545 1,044,375 1,067,170 1,056,335 1,107,800 1,097,865 38-PARK MAINTENANCE 2,850,221 2,450,704 3,048,432 3,090,400 3,058,045 3,436,775 3,316,825 3,612,025 3,444,575 39-RECREATION PROGRAMS 115,681 52,920 63,391 141,690 113,975 118,350 114,700 131,925 128,675 40-REDWOOD POOL 137,911 11,051 136,184 112,270 119,910 148,510 133,950 143,835 139,370 41-RECREATION SELF-SUPPORTED PROG 199,190 103,676 133,776 201,300 189,960 200,370 178,340 181,465 180,245 42-AV COMMUNITY CENTER 275,987 228,812 246,072 309,550 326,710 344,010 316,910 333,255 325,155 44-AQUATIC SWIM CENTER 697,484 299,078 773,166 624,955 769,570 799,020 757,220 816,535 790,840 45-APPLE VALLEY SENIOR CENTER 415,158 340,814 337,350 419,960 415,635 484,685 407,400 780,855 427,205 5,674,365 4,404,492 5,790,883 5,919,670 6,038,180 6,598,890 6,281,680 7,107,695 6,533,930 47-INSURANCE 313,150 313,712 325,000 337,000 420,450 454,900 454,900 485,700 485,700 48-CONTINGENCY&TRANSFERS 4,032,266 7,694,944 5,012,701 4,018,090 4,131,212 4,533,335 4,434,670 5,196,335 5,055,530 4,345,416 8,008,656 5,337,701 4,355,090 4,551,662 4,988,235 4,889,570 5,682,035 5,541,230 Grand Total 33,574,134 36,639,149 36,031,824 36,333,511 38,080,334 41,107,220 40,432,085 43,864,410 42,722,400 22 City of Apple Valley 2023-2024 Budget Summary by Object General Fund Object 2021 Council Account 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Original 6110-SALARY-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 13,076,168 13,551,505 14,046,625 14,596,005 6111-SALARY PART-TIME 782,448 791,438 845,753 880,815 6112-SALARY-SEASONAL TEMP 885,838 389,435 833,342 907,500 6113-OVERTIME-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 691,867 559,151 470,915 606,000 6114-OVERTIME PART-TIME EMPLOYEES 2,751 4,048 7,732 3,100 6117-HOLIDAY PAY 172,993 159,381 178,456 140,800 6119-ANNUAL LEAVE 0 1,801 5,896 0 6120-EMPLOYMENT AGENCIES 0 65,253 80,468 6121-INSURANCE CASH BENEFIT 50,760 56,400 57,960 0 6122-COMP REQUEST -256,507 -229,803 -228,418 -140,000 6123-SALARY-OTHER 0 0 0 0 6124-OVERTIME-SEASONAL TEMP 6,932 2,210 7,201 5,500 6105-SALARIES AND WAGES 15,413,250 15,350,818 16,305,930 16,999,720 6138-MEDICARE 213,182 209,403 223,390 244,190 6139-FICA 541,668 507,553 567,321 625,105 6141-PENSIONS-PERA 1,551,790 1,657,756 1,694,190 1,794,585 6142-WORKERS COMPENSATION 568,125 551,757 716,103 687,535 6143-UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 10,263 1,216 0 12,000 6144-LONG-TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE 25,835 26,854 23,093 42,010 6145-MEDICAL INSURANCE 2,399,062 2,592,446 2,667,425 2,695,520 6146-DENTAL INSURANCE 179,803 180,103 178,660 0 6147-LIFE INSURANCE-BASIC 970 962 1,037 0 6148-LIFE INSURANCE-SUPP/DEPEND 42,879 41,776 49,406 0 6170-EMPLOYEE PAID PREMIUMS -402,462 -477,123 -493,652 -243,080 6125-EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 5,131,115 5,292,703 5,626,972 5,857,865 6100-TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 20,544,366 20,643,522 21,932,902 22,857,585 6210-OFFICE SUPPLIES 20,837 22,313 20,799 25,905 6211-SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT 103,129 99,117 139,391 115,109 6212-MOTOR FUELS/OILS 262,745 167,128 232,761 263,825 6213-FERTILIZER 28,064 24,030 23,572 35,000 6214-CHEMICALS 11,637 12,222 12,286 14,650 6215-EQUIPMENT-PARTS 177,923 169,427 195,920 167,160 6216-VEHICLES-TIRES/BATTERIES 38,985 41,337 39,591 37,000 6229-GENERAL SUPPLIES 674,475 472,300 524,228 628,351 6205-SUPPLIES 1,317,795 1,007,874 1,188,547 1,287,000 6231-LEGAL SERVICES 545,824 547,589 583,041 553,000 6235-CONSULTANT SERVICES 244,952 206,515 229,413 260,060 6236-ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS 0 29,200 0 0 6237-TELEPHONE/PAGERS 160,474 151,513 152,113 159,210 6238-POSTAGE/UPS/FEDEX 34,742 94,406 30,149 33,700 6239-PRINTING 56,965 48,021 44,746 68,770 6240-CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE 101,156 94,420 106,470 100,060 6242-FIRE ALARM PLAN REVIEWS 0 0 0 0 6243-ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES 110,499 124,078 94,604 74,000 6244-ROW EPERMIT FEES 1,952 2,423 4,902 2,000 6249-OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,069,539 1,909,747 2,004,003 2,248,631 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,326,101 3,207,911 3,249,440 3,499,431 6255-UTILITIES-ELECTRIC 273,184 235,535 290,065 288,045 6256-UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS 138,088 88,832 138,160 130,279 6257-UTILITIES-PROPANE/WATER/SEWER 118,166 90,853 147,431 126,040 6250-UTILITIES 529,438 415,220 575,656 544,364 6265-REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 166,451 157,772 162,979 182,032 6266-REPAIRS-BUILDING 205,165 178,828 112,546 151,895 6269-REPAIRS-OTHER 81,516 25,636 180,426 57,000 6260-REPAIRS AND MAINTENA 453,132 362,237 455,952 390,927 6275-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL 69,768 50,969 82,038 101,445 6276-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP OTHER 68,461 10,807 19,606 80,895 6277-MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE 24,246 14,283 15,018 23,730 6278-SUBSISTENCE ALLOWANCE 5,575 1,500 936 7,900 6280-DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 151,936 180,937 198,209 211,775 6281-UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 187,894 163,291 178,832 188,649 6270-TRAINING/TRAVEUDUES 507,880 421,787 494,639 614,394 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 6,134,346 5,415,028 5,964,234 6,336,116 23 City of Apple Valley 2023-2024 Budget Summary by Object General Fund Object 2022 Council 2023 Dept 2023 2024 2024 Dept Account Adopted Proposed Admin Admin Proposed Original Recommend Recommend 6110-SALARY-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 14,612,215 15,766,310 15,665,595 16,628,230 16,430,085 6111-SALARY PART-TIME 903,825 943,325 943,325 973,750 973,750 6112-SALARY-SEASONAL TEMP 1,119,795 1,152,030 1,175,030 1,335,725 1,374,725 6113-OVERTIME-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 613,600 612,400 605,900 641,085 634,585 6114-OVERTIME PART-TIME EMPLOYEES 3,100 3,100 3,100 3,200 3,200 6117-HOLIDAY PAY 128,090 130,915 130,915 148,660 148,660 6119-ANNUAL LEAVE 0 6120-EMPLOYMENT AGENCIES 6121-INSURANCE CASH BENEFIT 0 6122-COMP REQUEST -160,250 -180,000 -205,000 -180,000 -205,000 6123-SALARY-OTHER 596,940 642,105 642,250 631,975 628,885 6124-OVERTIME-SEASONAL TEMP 4,500 4,250 4,250 4,250 4,250 6105-SALARIES AND WAGES 17,821,815 19,074,435 18,965,365 20,186,875 19,993,140 6138-MEDICARE 255,400 274,805 274,445 290,235 289,480 6139-FICA 662,110 693,955 692,860 730,345 727,320 6141-PENSIONS-PERA 1,860,160 1,987,895 1,986,040 2,094,665 2,090,745 6142-WORKERS COMPENSATION 820,215 1,141,355 1,140,835 1,240,440 1,238,415 6143-UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 6144-LONG-TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE 42,245 44,805 44,740 47,185 47,045 6145-MEDICAL INSURANCE 2,682,714 2,799,705 2,792,555 3,013,645 2,998,885 6146-DENTAL INSURANCE 0 6147-LIFE INSURANCE-BASIC 0 6148-LIFE INSURANCE-SUPP/DEPEND 0 6170-EMPLOYEE PAID PREMIUMS -187,900 -191,600 -272,500 -191,600 -317,825 6125-EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 6,146,944 6,762,920 6,670,975 7,236,915 7,086,065 6100-TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 23,968,759 25,837,355 25,636,340 27,423,790 27,079,205 6210-OFFICE SUPPLIES 28,230 26,705 26,705 28,730 28,655 6211-SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT 125,878 120,545 123,070 138,270 135,355 6212-MOTOR FUELS/OILS 279,765 412,030 412,030 395,860 395,860 6213-FERTILIZER 35,000 35,000 35,000 40,000 40,000 6214-CHEMICALS 10,300 16,360 16,250 17,965 17,850 6215-EQUIPMENT-PARTS 179,708 186,240 184,890 198,300 196,880 6216-VEHICLES-TIRES/BATTERIES 37,730 45,550 45,550 43,070 43,070 6229-GENERAL SUPPLIES 631,852 664,885 636,235 699,440 669,065 6205-SUPPLIES 1,328,463 1,507,315 1,479,730 1,561,635 1,526,735 6231-LEGAL SERVICES 579,344 595,950 595,950 613,310 613,310 6235-CONSULTANT SERVICES 298,825 313,760 301,310 288,595 288,985 6236-ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS 0 6237-TELEPHONE/PAGERS 157,225 159,335 159,335 162,090 161,990 6238-POSTAGE/UPS/FEDEX 75,700 37,575 37,575 96,575 96,575 6239-PRINTING 78,740 65,560 64,960 69,870 69,470 6240-CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE 103,455 93,845 92,195 96,225 94,545 6242-FIRE ALARM PLAN REVIEWS 0 6243-ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES 96,000 96,000 96,000 88,000 88,000 6244-ROW EPERMIT FEES 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 6249-OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,239,895 2,437,920 2,419,335 2,342,385 2,330,910 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,632,184 3,802,945 3,769,660 3,760,050 3,746,785 6255-UTILITIES-ELECTRIC 295,355 298,550 282,925 301,165 287,290 6256-UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS 132,395 152,815 165,815 157,090 169,965 6257-UTILITIES-PROPANE/WATER/SEWER 126,475 128,335 128,335 129,500 129,500 6250-UTILITIES 554,225 579,700 577,075 587,755 586,755 6265-REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 200,427 210,540 197,390 216,460 213,660 6266-REPAIRS-BUILDING 144,295 153,645 137,145 154,730 141,235 6269-REPAIRS-OTHER 3,000 78,000 3,000 159,650 3,150 6260-REPAIRS AND MAINTENA 347,722 442,185 337,535 530,840 358,045 6275-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL 99,850 112,255 112,255 121,415 122,850 6276-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP OTHER 93,295 97,195 94,145 101,825 99,775 6277-MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE 24,185 23,835 21,635 24,375 22,155 6278-SUBSISTENCE ALLOWANCE 7,600 7,600 7,600 7,850 7,850 6280-DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 222,310 270,355 270,235 278,355 278,235 6281-UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 200,469 230,225 198,665 213,395 207,470 6270-TRAINING/TRAVEUDUES 647,709 741,465 704,535 747,215 738,335 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 6,510,303 7,073,610 6,868,535 7,187,495 6,956,655 24 City of Apple Valley 2023-2024 Budget Summary by Object General Fund Object 2021 Council Account 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Original 6310-RENTAL EXPENSE 112,674 98,087 117,385 114,515 6311 -INSURANCE-PROPERTY/LIABILITY 313,150 312,500 325,000 325,000 6319-REIMBURSEMENT OF REV COLL FOR 566,875 586,695 624,213 571,887 6321 -CASH OVER/SHORT 25 0 0 0 6333-GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS -577 -749 -600 0 6349-LATE FEES/FINANCE CHARGES 32 0 4 0 6350-BANK FEES/CHARGES 588 101 764 0 6351 -VISA/BANK CHARGES 42,210 28,737 53,319 33,200 6355-ONLINE REGISTRATION FEES 23,076 39,316 30,355 25,000 6399-OTHER CHARGES 380,317 346,732 386,352 562,508 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES 1,438,369 1,411,419 1,536,792 1,632,110 6540-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE 58,975 501 63,850 67,500 6545-NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE 0 0 0 0 6500-TOTAL EXPENDITURES 58,975 501 63,850 67,500 6715-CAPITAL OUTLAY-BUILDINGS 0 16,257 1,911 0 6720-CAPITAL OUTLAY-FURNITURE&FIX 383 0 0 0 6725-CAPITAL OUTLAY-OFFICE EQUIP 158,191 66,656 117,644 184,000 6730-CAPITAL OUTLAY-TRANSPORTATION 0 0 0 0 6735-CAPITAL OUTLAY-OTHER IMPROVEME 83,091 10,720 5,490 6,200 6740-CAPITAL OUTLAY-MACH/EQ/OTHER 86,224 242,814 0 42,500 6745-VERF CHARGES 1,049,410 1,152,820 1,388,000 1,345,500 6700-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,377,299 1,489,266 1,513,046 1,578,200 6001-EXPENDITURES 29,553,354 28,959,737 31,010,824 32,471,511 7110-TRANSFER TO OTHER FUNDS 4,020,780 7,679,412 5,021,000 3,862,000 7100-TOTAL TRANSFERS 4,020,780 7,679,412 5,021,000 3,862,000 GRAND TOTAL 33,574,134 36,639,149 36,031,824 36,333,511 25 City of Apple Valley 2023-2024 Budget Summary by Object General Fund Object 2022 Council 2023 Dept 2023 2024 2024 Dept Account Adopted Proposed Admin Admin Proposed Original Recommend Recommend 6310-RENTAL EXPENSE 114,885 118,610 115,460 125,360 121,210 6311 -INSURANCE-PROPERTY/LIABILITY 408,450 442,900 442,900 473,700 473,700 6319-REIMBURSEMENT OF REV COLL FOR 625,375 656,995 659,995 664,000 667,000 6321 -CASH OVER/SHORT 0 6333-GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS 0 6349-LATE FEES/FINANCE CHARGES 0 6350-BANK FEES/CHARGES 100 100 100 100 100 6351 -VISA/BANK CHARGES 36,200 39,250 45,950 42,025 49,025 6355-ONLINE REGISTRATION FEES 25,000 29,800 29,800 29,800 29,800 6399-OTHER CHARGES 558,682 538,250 525,905 554,455 615,895 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES 1,768,692 1,825,905 1,820,110 1,889,440 1,956,730 6540-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE 60,000 52,500 53,000 55,125 55,250 6545-NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE 0 6500-TOTAL EXPENDITURES 60,000 52,500 53,000 55,125 55,250 6715-CAPITAL OUTLAY-BUILDINGS 0 6720-CAPITAL OUTLAY-FURNITURE&FIX 0 6725-CAPITAL OUTLAY-OFFICE EQUIP 246,000 190,550 187,800 209,400 209,400 6730-CAPITAL OUTLAY-TRANSPORTATION 0 6735-CAPITAL OUTLAY-OTHER IMPROVEME 0 83,000 0 358,000 18,000 6740-CAPITAL OUTLAY-MACH/EQ/OTHER 83,000 70,000 30,000 84,000 0 6745-VERF CHARGES 1,438,580 1,522,300 1,484,300 1,542,160 1,542,160 6700-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,767,580 1,865,850 1,702,100 2,193,560 1,769,560 6001-EXPENDITURES 34,075,334 36,655,220 36,080,085 38,749,410 37,817,400 7110-TRANSFER TO OTHER FUNDS 4,005,000 4,452,000 4,352,000 5,115,000 4,905,000 7100-TOTAL TRANSFERS 4,005,000 4,452,000 4,352,000 5,115,000 4,905,000 GRAND TOTAL 38,080,334 41,107,220 40,432,085 43,864,410 42,722,400 26 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023-2024 GENERAL FUND SUMMARY TOTAL EXPENSES BY DEPARTMENT AND EXP.TYPE Department Object 2021 Council 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Account Adopted Original 01-MAYOR&CITY COUNCIL PERSONNEL SERVICES 126,855 131,174 122,790 133,710 01-MAYOR&CITY COUNCIL OPERATING COSTS 15,937 9,026 4,837 24,285 01-MAYOR&CITY COUNCIL OTHER EXPENDITURES 100 (250) 2,033 - 01-MAYOR&CITY COUNCIL EXPENDITURES 142,892 139,950 129,660 157,995 02-ADMINISTRATION PERSONNEL SERVICES 469,143 491,673 581,993 598,105 02-ADMINISTRATION OPERATING COSTS 14,412 7,909 9,930 16,330 02-ADMINISTRATION CAPITAL OUTLAY 383 - - - 02-ADMINISTRATION EXPENDITURES 483,938 499,582 591,924 614,435 03-CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS PERSONNEL SERVICES 216,338 360,712 247,320 240,645 03-CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS OPERATING COSTS 75,940 114,299 73,394 92,550 03-CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS OTHER EXPENDITURES 1,700 949 1,600 3,100 03-CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS EXPENDITURES 293,978 475,960 322,314 336,295 04-HUMAN RESOURCES/FRONT DESK PERSONNEL SERVICES 509,702 537,105 561,312 572,455 04-HUMAN RESOURCES/FRONT DESK OPERATING COSTS 32,454 27,155 28,175 43,315 04-HUMAN RESOURCES/FRONT DESK OTHER EXPENDITURES 28,668 23,257 16,924 33,200 04-HUMAN RESOURCES/FRONT DESK CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,738 - - - 04-HUMAN RESOURCES/FRONT DESK EXPENDITURES 572,562 587,517 606,411 648,970 05-INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PERSONNEL SERVICES 533,166 611,774 639,302 643,330 05-INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OPERATING COSTS 259,556 137,121 233,741 285,915 05-INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OTHER EXPENDITURES 11,717 8,764 8,768 9,300 05-INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CAPITAL OUTLAY 146,596 66,656 89,236 184,000 05-INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY EXPENDITURES 951,036 824,315 971,048 1,122,545 16-GENERAL GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS PERSONNEL SERVICES 194,944 207,223 173,881 208,885 16-GENERAL GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS OPERATING COSTS 197,911 289,690 217,588 180,090 16-GENERAL GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS OTHER EXPENDITURES 257 313 192 - 16-GENERAL GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS CAPITAL OUTLAY 2,620 2,620 7,031 2,620 16-GENERAL GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS EXPENDITURES 395,732 499,845 398,692 391,595 08-FINANCE PERSONNEL SERVICES 637,178 666,326 695,830 678,820 08-FINANCE OPERATING COSTS 42,996 95,702 34,250 43,285 08-FINANCE OTHER EXPENDITURES 5,726 5,626 6,426 5,290 08-FINANCE CAPITAL OUTLAY - - 1,671 - 08-FINANCE EXPENDITURES 685,901 767,654 738,176 727,395 09-DATA PROCESSING OPERATING COSTS - - - - 09-DATA PROCESSING OTHER EXPENDITURES 253,773 263,097 265,311 259,178 09-DATA PROCESSING EXPENDITURES 253,773 263,097 265,311 259,178 10-INDEPENDENT AUDIT OPERATING COSTS 12,685 12,085 18,361 17,195 10-INDEPENDENT AUDIT EXPENDITURES 12,685 12,085 18,361 17,195 14-LEGAL SERVICES PERSONNEL SERVICES - - - - 14-LEGAL SERVICES OPERATING COSTS 545,824 547,589 583,041 553,000 14-LEGAL SERVICES EXPENDITURES 545,824 547,589 583,041 553,000 15-COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PERSONNEL SERVICES 648,476 655,724 735,797 695,105 15-COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OPERATING COSTS 60,025 40,015 41,594 43,250 15-COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OTHER EXPENDITURES 550 550 213 600 15-COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CAPITAL OUTLAY - - - - 15-COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT EXPENDITURES 709,051 696,289 777,604 738,955 06-CODE ENFORCEMENT PERSONNEL SERVICES 215,193 255,946 211,476 311,290 06-CODE ENFORCEMENT OPERATING COSTS 6,696 3,870 4,040 7,380 06-CODE ENFORCEMENT OTHER EXPENDITURES - - - - 06-CODE ENFORCEMENT CAPITAL OUTLAY 2,540 2,540 2,540 2,540 06-CODE ENFORCEMENT EXPENDITURES 224,429 262,356 218,057 321,210 20-POLICE PERSONNEL SERVICES 7,999,491 8,453,205 8,589,114 8,742,445 20-POLICE OPERATING COSTS 1,513,455 1,473,918 1,419,159 1,526,005 20-POLICE OTHER EXPENDITURES 22,545 20,156 24,384 28,000 20-POLICE CAPITAL OUTLAY 239,045 262,000 288,200 288,200 20-POLICE EXPENDITURES 9,774,536 10,209,278 10,320,857 10,584,650 21-CIVIL DEFENSE PERSONNEL SERVICES - 21-CIVIL DEFENSE OPERATING COSTS 18,927 19,680 30,488 20,926 21-CIVIL DEFENSE OTHER EXPENDITURES - - - - 21-CIVIL DEFENSE CAPITAL OUTLAY - - - - 21-CIVIL DEFENSE EXPENDITURES 18,927 19,680 30,488 20,926 22-COMM SERV OFFICER(CSO) PERSONNEL SERVICES 46,649 60,788 80,835 98,880 22-COMM SERV OFFICER(CSO) OPERATING COSTS 7,693 4,858 10,650 13,375 22-COMM SERV OFFICER(CSO) OTHER EXPENDITURES - - - - 22-COMM SERV OFFICER(CSO) EXPENDITURES 54,343 65,647 91,485 112,255 23-FIRE PERSONNEL SERVICES 1,214,963 1,313,639 1,395,272 1,407,700 23-FIRE OPERATING COSTS 403,437 308,052 394,036 391,909 23-FIRE OTHER EXPENDITURES 3,121 2,081 (110) 3,650 23-FIRE CAPITAL OUTLAY 337,050 388,400 407,800 407,800 23-FIRE EXPENDITURES 1,958,570 2,012,172 2,196,999 2,211,059 76-FIRE RELIEF PERSONNEL SERVICES - - - - 76-FIRE RELIEF OPERATING COSTS 750 517 750 1,000 76-FIRE RELIEF OTHER EXPENDITURES 566,875 586,695 624,213 571,887 76-FIRE RELIEF EXPENDITURES 567,625 587,212 624,963 572,887 27 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023-2024 GENERAL FUND SUMMARY TOTAL EXPENSES BY DEPARTMENT AND EXP.TYPE Department Object 2022 Council 2023 Dept 2023 2024 Dept 2024 Account Adopted Original Proposed Admin Recommend Proposed Admin Recommend 01-MAYOR&CITY COUNCIL PERSONNEL SERVICES 123,365 129,600 129,600 136,095 136,095 01-MAYOR&CITY COUNCIL OPERATING COSTS 21,535 21,535 21,535 22,035 22,035 01-MAYOR&CITY COUNCIL OTHER EXPENDITURES - - - - - 01-MAYOR&CITY COUNCIL EXPENDITURES 144,900 151,135 151,135 158,130 158,130 02-ADMINISTRATION PERSONNEL SERVICES 616,840 654,375 654,375 691,540 691,540 02-ADMINISTRATION OPERATING COSTS 53,255 58,255 58,255 60,250 60,250 02-ADMINISTRATION CAPITAL OUTLAY - - - - - 02-ADMINISTRATION EXPENDITURES 670,095 712,630 712,630 751,790 751,790 03-CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS PERSONNEL SERVICES 414,000 350,755 350,755 508,720 508,720 03-CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS OPERATING COSTS 105,405 105,700 105,700 111,090 122,690 03-CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS OTHER EXPENDITURES 3,100 1,600 1,600 5,000 5,000 03-CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS EXPENDITURES 522,505 458,055 458,055 624,810 636,410 04-HUMAN RESOURCES/FRONT DESK PERSONNEL SERVICES 587,855 600,140 600,140 622,625 622,625 04-HUMAN RESOURCES/FRONT DESK OPERATING COSTS 43,705 46,205 46,205 46,705 46,705 04-HUMAN RESOURCES/FRONT DESK OTHER EXPENDITURES 34,700 36,700 34,700 35,650 35,650 04-HUMAN RESOURCES/FRONT DESK CAPITAL OUTLAY - 2,750 - - - 04-HUMAN RESOURCES/FRONT DESK EXPENDITURES 666,260 685,795 681,045 704,980 704,980 05-INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PERSONNEL SERVICES 662,739 687,085 682,940 705,940 705,940 05-INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OPERATING COSTS 373,085 386,160 386,160 388,960 388,960 05-INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OTHER EXPENDITURES 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 05-INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CAPITAL OUTLAY 246,000 187,800 187,800 209,400 209,400 05-INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY EXPENDITURES 1,290,824 1,270,045 1,265,900 1,313,300 1,313,300 16-GENERAL GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS PERSONNEL SERVICES 197,525 275,350 275,350 286,645 286,645 16-GENERAL GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS OPERATING COSTS 176,700 166,300 166,300 167,900 167,900 16-GENERAL GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS OTHER EXPENDITURES - - - - - 16-GENERAL GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS CAPITAL OUTLAY 2,620 2,690 2,690 3,690 3,690 16-GENERAL GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS EXPENDITURES 376,845 444,340 444,340 458,235 458,235 08-FINANCE PERSONNEL SERVICES 708,640 722,540 718,040 751,870 747,370 08-FINANCE OPERATING COSTS 86,085 48,190 48,070 107,385 107,265 08-FINANCE OTHER EXPENDITURES 5,910 5,910 5,910 5,910 5,910 08-FINANCE CAPITAL OUTLAY - - - - - 08-FINANCE EXPENDITURES 800,635 776,640 772,020 865,165 860,545 09-DATA PROCESSING OPERATING COSTS - - - - - 09-DATA PROCESSING OTHER EXPENDITURES 278,755 294,735 294,735 312,575 312,575 09-DATA PROCESSING EXPENDITURES 278,755 294,735 294,735 312,575 312,575 10-INDEPENDENT AUDIT OPERATING COSTS 16,800 17,200 17,200 17,500 17,500 10-INDEPENDENT AUDIT EXPENDITURES 16,800 17,200 17,200 17,500 17,500 14-LEGAL SERVICES PERSONNEL SERVICES - - - - - 14-LEGAL SERVICES OPERATING COSTS 579,344 595,950 595,950 613,310 613,310 14-LEGAL SERVICES EXPENDITURES 579,344 595,950 595,950 613,310 613,310 15-COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PERSONNEL SERVICES 712,220 740,620 731,765 767,870 762,860 15-COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OPERATING COSTS 36,650 37,650 36,950 37,650 38,290 15-COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OTHER EXPENDITURES 600 600 600 600 600 15-COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CAPITAL OUTLAY - - - - - 15-COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT EXPENDITURES 749,470 778,870 769,315 806,120 801,750 06-CODE ENFORCEMENT PERSONNEL SERVICES 312,655 326,340 325,340 343,480 342,480 06-CODE ENFORCEMENT OPERATING COSTS 31,750 32,000 32,000 32,000 32,000 06-CODE ENFORCEMENT OTHER EXPENDITURES - - - - - 06-CODE ENFORCEMENT CAPITAL OUTLAY 2,540 5,890 5,890 6,070 6,070 06-CODE ENFORCEMENT EXPENDITURES 346,945 364,230 363,230 381,550 380,550 20-POLICE PERSONNEL SERVICES 9,096,640 10,026,500 9,897,555 10,684,905 10,449,905 20-POLICE OPERATING COSTS 1,547,285 1,527,585 1,522,585 1,555,155 1,550,155 20-POLICE OTHER EXPENDITURES 28,000 28,900 28,900 29,100 29,100 20-POLICE CAPITAL OUTLAY 296,800 304,200 304,200 311,810 311,810 20-POLICE EXPENDITURES 10,968,725 11,887,185 11,753,240 12,580,970 12,340,970 21-CIVIL DEFENSE PERSONNEL SERVICES - 21-CIVIL DEFENSE OPERATING COSTS 24,350 48,300 48,300 48,500 48,500 21-CIVIL DEFENSE OTHER EXPENDITURES - - - - - 21-CIVIL DEFENSE CAPITAL OUTLAY - - - - - 21-CIVIL DEFENSE EXPENDITURES 24,350 48,300 48,300 48,500 48,500 22-COMM SERV OFFICER(CSO) PERSONNEL SERVICES 113,335 125,560 125,560 132,915 132,915 22-COMM SERV OFFICER(CSO) OPERATING COSTS 13,875 13,875 13,875 13,875 13,875 22-COMM SERV OFFICER(CSO) OTHER EXPENDITURES - - - - - 22-COMM SERV OFFICER(CSO) EXPENDITURES 127,210 139,435 139,435 146,790 146,790 23-FIRE PERSONNEL SERVICES 1,463,210 1,551,290 1,551,290 1,624,530 1,624,530 23-FIRE OPERATING COSTS 390,517 404,395 375,395 415,045 411,045 23-FIRE OTHER EXPENDITURES 3,800 3,900 3,900 3,900 3,900 23-FIRE CAPITAL OUTLAY 418,000 428,450 428,450 439,160 439,160 23-FIRE EXPENDITURES 2,275,527 2,388,035 2,359,035 2,482,635 2,478,635 76-FIRE RELIEF PERSONNEL SERVICES - - - - - 76-FIRE RELIEF OPERATING COSTS 1,000 1,000 750 1,000 750 76-FIRE RELIEF OTHER EXPENDITURES 625,375 656,995 659,995 664,000 667,000 76-FIRE RELIEF EXPENDITURES 626,375 657,995 660,745 665,000 667,750 28 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023-2024 GENERAL FUND SUMMARY TOTAL EXPENSES BY DEPARTMENT AND EXP.TYPE Department Object 2021 Council 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Account Adopted Original 27-PW ENGINEERING PERSONNEL SERVICES 642,027 694,092 722,492 796,975 27-PW ENGINEERING OPERATING COSTS 106,035 117,630 131,748 164,270 27-PW ENGINEERING OTHER EXPENDITURES 15 - - - 27-PW ENGINEERING CAPITAL OUTLAY 10,250 10,510 10,770 10,770 27-PW ENGINEERING EXPENDITURES 758,327 822,232 865,010 972,015 28-BUILDING INSPECTIONS PERSONNEL SERVICES 666,534 682,081 649,199 660,585 28-BUILDING INSPECTIONS OPERATING COSTS 135,789 147,001 113,878 103,415 28-BUILDING INSPECTIONS OTHER EXPENDITURES 68,895 70,561 78,757 73,250 28-BUILDING INSPECTIONS CAPITAL OUTLAY 13,970 29,237 31,528 13,370 28-BUILDING INSPECTIONS EXPENDITURES 885,188 928,879 873,362 850,620 29-PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN/NATURAL RES PERSONNEL SERVICES 464,677 468,163 502,453 520,255 29-PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN/NATURAL RES OPERATING COSTS 177,022 90,465 228,162 250,335 29-PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN/NATURAL RES OTHER EXPENDITURES 3,251 3,690 3,214 3,725 29-PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN/NATURAL RES CAPITAL OUTLAY 12,987 2,000 2,050 2,050 29-PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN/NATURAL RES EXPENDITURES 657,937 564,318 735,878 776,365 30-CMF-FLEET&BUILDINGS PERSONNEL SERVICES 547,440 596,347 626,072 642,415 30-CMF-FLEET&BUILDINGS OPERATING COSTS 172,114 168,738 161,581 182,210 30-CMF-FLEET&BUILDINGS OTHER EXPENDITURES 7,395 7,729 5,849 7,540 30-CMF-FLEET&BUILDINGS CAPITAL OUTLAY 19,945 10,620 12,620 13,330 30-CMF-FLEET&BUILDINGS EXPENDITURES 746,894 783,434 806,122 845,495 31-STREET MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL SERVICES 1,419,513 1,397,684 1,385,074 1,692,005 31-STREET MAINTENANCE OPERATING COSTS 466,609 455,555 457,965 506,720 31-STREET MAINTENANCE OTHER EXPENDITURES 1,181 1,203 163 - 31-STREET MAINTENANCE CAPITAL OUTLAY 202,000 235,820 382,900 382,900 31-STREET MAINTENANCE EXPENDITURES 2,089,303 2,090,262 2,226,102 2,581,625 32-SNOW&ICE REMOVAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 272,973 159,395 129,564 160,330 32-SNOW&ICE REMOVAL OPERATING COSTS 286,526 197,389 184,707 252,276 32-SNOW&ICE REMOVAL OTHER EXPENDITURES - (1) - - 32-SNOW&ICE REMOVAL CAPITAL OUTLAY - - - - 32-SNOW&ICE REMOVAL EXPENDITURES 559,499 356,783 314,271 412,606 33-TRAFFIC SIGNS/SIGNALS/MARKERS PERSONNEL SERVICES 74,250 85,776 65,729 85,865 33-TRAFFIC SIGNS/SIGNALS/MARKERS OPERATING COSTS 129,274 124,087 131,113 143,615 33-TRAFFIC SIGNS/SIGNALS/MARKERS OTHER EXPENDITURES (9) - 264 - 33-TRAFFIC SIGNS/SIGNALS/MARKERS CAPITAL OUTLAY 7,890 - - - 33-TRAFFIC SIGNS/SIGNALS/MARKERS EXPENDITURES 211,405 209,863 197,106 229,480 37-PARK/RECREATION ADMINISTRATION PERSONNEL SERVICES 837,593 813,081 916,956 856,960 37-PARK/RECREATION ADMINISTRATION OPERATING COSTS 80,766 61,572 64,786 97,985 37-PARK/RECREATION ADMINISTRATION OTHER EXPENDITURES 62,599 42,784 70,771 64,600 37-PARK/RECREATION ADMINISTRATION CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,776 - - - 37-PARK/RECREATION ADMINISTRATION EXPENDITURES 982,734 917,437 1,052,513 1,019,545 38-PARK MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL SERVICES 1,722,033 1,526,924 1,854,835 1,976,680 38-PARK MAINTENANCE OPERATING COSTS 787,053 631,900 851,999 779,100 38-PARK MAINTENANCE OTHER EXPENDITURES 62,449 51,959 70,978 64,000 38-PARK MAINTENANCE CAPITAL OUTLAY 278,686 239,921 270,620 270,620 38-PARK MAINTENANCE EXPENDITURES 2,850,221 2,450,704 3,048,432 3,090,400 39-RECREATION PROGRAMS PERSONNEL SERVICES 91,011 40,466 51,637 122,495 39-RECREATION PROGRAMS OPERATING COSTS 21,859 12,468 8,820 15,195 39-RECREATION PROGRAMS OTHER EXPENDITURES 1,774 (14) 2,934 4,000 39-RECREATION PROGRAMS EXPENDITURES 1,037 - - - 39-RECREATION PROGRAMS CAPITAL OUTLAY - - - - 39-RECREATION PROGRAMS EXPENDITURES 115,681 52,920 63,391 141,690 40-REDWOOD POOL PERSONNEL SERVICES 71,003 - 92,402 67,770 40-REDWOOD POOL OPERATING COSTS 35,148 9,961 38,059 39,100 40-REDWOOD POOL OTHER EXPENDITURES 1,277 1,090 1,700 1,400 40-REDWOOD POOL EXPENDITURES 3,611 - 4,022 4,000 40-REDWOOD POOL CAPITAL OUTLAY 26,872 - - - 40-REDWOOD POOL EXPENDITURES 137,911 11,051 136,184 112,270 41-RECREATION SELF-SUPPORTED PROG PERSONNEL SERVICES 52,907 20,907 39,675 56,075 41-RECREATION SELF-SUPPORTED PROG OPERATING COSTS 134,740 79,288 88,054 134,875 41-RECREATION SELF-SUPPORTED PROG OTHER EXPENDITURES 4,603 2,979 6,047 5,850 41-RECREATION SELF-SUPPORTED PROG EXPENDITURES 6,940 501 - 4,500 41-RECREATION SELF-SUPPORTED PROG EXPENDITURES 199,190 103,676 133,776 201,300 42-AV COMMUNITY CENTER PERSONNEL SERVICES 177,141 142,513 170,166 209,450 42-AV COMMUNITY CENTER OPERATING COSTS 90,787 82,190 68,407 96,100 42-AV COMMUNITY CENTER OTHER EXPENDITURES 8,060 4,110 7,499 4,000 42-AV COMMUNITY CENTER EXPENDITURES - - - - 42-AV COMMUNITY CENTER EXPENDITURES - - - - 42-AV COMMUNITY CENTER CAPITAL OUTLAY - - - - 42-AV COMMUNITY CENTER EXPENDITURES 275,987 228,812 246,072 309,550 44-AQUATIC SWIM CENTER PERSONNEL SERVICES 376,647 860 426,266 342,355 44-AQUATIC SWIM CENTER OPERATING COSTS 217,746 58,168 274,941 215,300 44-AQUATIC SWIM CENTER OTHER EXPENDITURES 8,422 1,108 12,132 8,300 44-AQUATIC SWIM CENTER EXPENDITURES 47,387 - 59,827 59,000 44-AQUATIC SWIM CENTER CAPITAL OUTLAY 47,281 238,942 - - 44-AQUATIC SWIM CENTER EXPENDITURES 697,484 299,078 773,166 624,955 29 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023-2024 GENERAL FUND SUMMARY TOTAL EXPENSES BY DEPARTMENT AND EXP.TYPE Department Object 2022 Council 2023 Dept 2023 2024 Dept 2024 Account Adopted Original Proposed Admin Recommend Proposed Admin Recommend 27-PW ENGINEERING PERSONNEL SERVICES 778,210 973,930 973,930 1,011,240 1,011,240 27-PW ENGINEERING OPERATING COSTS 178,790 199,375 201,850 185,445 185,620 27-PW ENGINEERING OTHER EXPENDITURES - - - - - 27-PW ENGINEERING CAPITAL OUTLAY 11,040 11,320 11,320 11,600 11,600 27-PW ENGINEERING EXPENDITURES 968,040 1,184,625 1,187,100 1,208,285 1,208,460 28-BUILDING INSPECTIONS PERSONNEL SERVICES 732,455 788,535 788,535 832,950 832,950 28-BUILDING INSPECTIONS OPERATING COSTS 129,555 150,420 150,420 145,950 145,950 28-BUILDING INSPECTIONS OTHER EXPENDITURES 78,000 81,600 81,600 85,150 85,150 28-BUILDING INSPECTIONS CAPITAL OUTLAY 13,770 14,180 14,180 14,610 14,610 28-BUILDING INSPECTIONS EXPENDITURES 953,780 1,034,735 1,034,735 1,078,660 1,078,660 29-PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN/NATURAL RES PERSONNEL SERVICES 522,500 544,390 544,390 567,500 567,500 29-PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN/NATURAL RES OPERATING COSTS 224,010 463,275 463,075 315,955 315,755 29-PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN/NATURAL RES OTHER EXPENDITURES 3,725 3,750 3,750 3,775 3,775 29-PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN/NATURAL RES CAPITAL OUTLAY 2,100 2,150 2,150 2,200 2,200 29-PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN/NATURAL RES EXPENDITURES 752,335 1,013,565 1,013,365 889,430 889,230 30-CMF-FLEET&BUILDINGS PERSONNEL SERVICES 654,290 754,920 719,250 888,735 816,885 30-CMF-FLEET&BUILDINGS OPERATING COSTS 187,144 222,905 222,405 225,210 224,710 30-CMF-FLEET&BUILDINGS OTHER EXPENDITURES 7,840 8,000 8,000 7,965 7,965 30-CMF-FLEET&BUILDINGS CAPITAL OUTLAY 8,910 10,250 10,250 32,290 32,290 30-CMF-FLEET&BUILDINGS EXPENDITURES 858,184 996,075 959,905 1,154,200 1,081,850 31-STREET MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL SERVICES 1,861,735 1,874,575 1,848,675 1,976,570 1,940,345 31-STREET MAINTENANCE OPERATING COSTS 495,235 568,225 563,025 566,125 560,925 31-STREET MAINTENANCE OTHER EXPENDITURES - - - - - 31-STREET MAINTENANCE CAPITAL OUTLAY 466,000 470,770 470,770 493,920 453,920 31-STREET MAINTENANCE EXPENDITURES 2,822,970 2,913,570 2,882,470 3,036,615 2,955,190 32-SNOW&ICE REMOVAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 164,360 166,835 166,835 167,400 167,400 32-SNOW&ICE REMOVAL OPERATING COSTS 248,163 271,650 271,650 289,725 289,725 32-SNOW&ICE REMOVAL OTHER EXPENDITURES - - - - - 32-SNOW&ICE REMOVAL CAPITAL OUTLAY - - - - - 32-SNOW&ICE REMOVAL EXPENDITURES 412,523 438,485 438,485 457,125 457,125 33-TRAFFIC SIGNS/SIGNALS/MARKERS PERSONNEL SERVICES 89,675 99,235 99,235 102,515 102,515 33-TRAFFIC SIGNS/SIGNALS/MARKERS OPERATING COSTS 167,420 169,230 159,230 192,490 182,490 33-TRAFFIC SIGNS/SIGNALS/MARKERS OTHER EXPENDITURES - - - - - 33-TRAFFIC SIGNS/SIGNALS/MARKERS CAPITAL OUTLAY - - - 24,000 - 33-TRAFFIC SIGNS/SIGNALS/MARKERS EXPENDITURES 257,095 268,465 258,465 319,005 285,005 37-PARK/RECREATION ADMINISTRATION PERSONNEL SERVICES 923,240 947,135 947,135 987,565 987,565 37-PARK/RECREATION ADMINISTRATION OPERATING COSTS 57,135 45,635 43,200 45,835 43,300 37-PARK/RECREATION ADMINISTRATION OTHER EXPENDITURES 64,000 74,400 66,000 74,400 67,000 37-PARK/RECREATION ADMINISTRATION CAPITAL OUTLAY - - - - - 37-PARK/RECREATION ADMINISTRATION EXPENDITURES 1,044,375 1,067,170 1,056,335 1,107,800 1,097,865 38-PARK MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL SERVICES 2,022,045 2,218,425 2,226,425 2,296,765 2,305,765 38-PARK MAINTENANCE OPERATING COSTS 717,200 847,450 760,000 958,950 786,000 38-PARK MAINTENANCE OTHER EXPENDITURES 64,000 68,500 66,000 71,500 68,000 38-PARK MAINTENANCE CAPITAL OUTLAY 254,800 302,400 264,400 284,810 284,810 38-PARK MAINTENANCE EXPENDITURES 3,058,045 3,436,775 3,316,825 3,612,025 3,444,575 39-RECREATION PROGRAMS PERSONNEL SERVICES 93,375 98,800 98,800 112,175 112,175 39-RECREATION PROGRAMS OPERATING COSTS 15,200 16,050 13,400 16,750 13,900 39-RECREATION PROGRAMS OTHER EXPENDITURES 5,400 3,500 2,500 3,000 2,600 39-RECREATION PROGRAMS EXPENDITURES - - - - - 39-RECREATION PROGRAMS CAPITAL OUTLAY - - - - - 39-RECREATION PROGRAMS EXPENDITURES 113,975 118,350 114,700 131,925 128,675 40-REDWOOD POOL PERSONNEL SERVICES 75,760 91,700 91,700 94,720 94,720 40-REDWOOD POOL OPERATING COSTS 40,350 42,460 37,700 44,565 39,775 40-REDWOOD POOL OTHER EXPENDITURES 1,800 1,850 1,550 1,925 1,625 40-REDWOOD POOL EXPENDITURES 2,000 2,500 3,000 2,625 3,250 40-REDWOOD POOL CAPITAL OUTLAY - 10,000 - - - 40-REDWOOD POOL EXPENDITURES 119,910 148,510 133,950 143,835 139,370 41-RECREATION SELF-SUPPORTED PROG PERSONNEL SERVICES 47,635 59,690 59,690 61,545 61,545 41-RECREATION SELF-SUPPORTED PROG OPERATING COSTS 136,000 133,550 110,600 115,120 110,650 41-RECREATION SELF-SUPPORTED PROG OTHER EXPENDITURES 6,325 7,130 8,050 4,800 8,050 41-RECREATION SELF-SUPPORTED PROG EXPENDITURES - - - - - 41-RECREATION SELF-SUPPORTED PROG EXPENDITURES 189,960 200,370 178,340 181,465 180,245 42-AV COMMUNITY CENTER PERSONNEL SERVICES 227,110 223,510 223,510 230,755 230,755 42-AV COMMUNITY CENTER OPERATING COSTS 95,600 98,500 87,400 98,500 88,400 42-AV COMMUNITY CENTER OTHER EXPENDITURES 4,000 4,000 6,000 4,000 6,000 42-AV COMMUNITY CENTER EXPENDITURES - - - - - 42-AV COMMUNITY CENTER EXPENDITURES - - - - - 42-AV COMMUNITY CENTER CAPITAL OUTLAY - 18,000 - - - 42-AV COMMUNITY CENTER EXPENDITURES 326,710 344,010 316,910 333,255 325,155 44-AQUATIC SWIM CENTER PERSONNEL SERVICES 439,820 465,670 465,670 480,765 480,765 44-AQUATIC SWIM CENTER OPERATING COSTS 217,850 233,250 231,000 252,665 246,025 44-AQUATIC SWIM CENTER OTHER EXPENDITURES 8,900 10,100 10,550 10,605 12,050 44-AQUATIC SWIM CENTER EXPENDITURES 58,000 50,000 50,000 52,500 52,000 44-AQUATIC SWIM CENTER CAPITAL OUTLAY 45,000 40,000 - 20,000 - 44-AQUATIC SWIM CENTER EXPENDITURES 769,570 799,020 757,220 816,535 790,840 30 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023-2024 GENERAL FUND SUMMARY TOTAL EXPENSES BY DEPARTMENT AND EXP.TYPE Department Object 2021 Council 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Account Adopted Original 45-APPLE VALLEY SENIOR CENTER PERSONNEL SERVICES 316,518 268,733 273,757 324,000 45-APPLE VALLEY SENIOR CENTER OPERATING COSTS 72,693 71,596 55,983 95,810 45-APPLE VALLEY SENIOR CENTER OTHER EXPENDITURES 277 485 1,530 150 45-APPLE VALLEY SENIOR CENTER CAPITAL OUTLAY 25,670 - 6,080 - 45-APPLE VALLEY SENIOR CENTER EXPENDITURES 415,158 340,814 337,350 419,960 47-INSURANCE PERSONNEL SERVICES - 1,212 - 12,000 47-INSURANCE OTHER EXPENDITURES 313,150 312,500 325,000 325,000 47-INSURANCE EXPENDITURES 313,150 313,712 325,000 337,000 48-CONTINGENCY&TRANSFERS PERSONNEL SERVICES - - (8,299) - 48-CONTINGENCY&TRANSFERS OPERATING COSTS 11,486 15,532 - - 48-CONTINGENCY&TRANSFERS OTHER EXPENDITURES - - - 156,090 48-CONTINGENCY&TRANSFERS TRANSFERS 4,020,780 7,679,412 5,021,000 3,862,000 48-CONTINGENCY&TRANSFERS EXPENDITURES 4,032,266 7,694,944 5,012,701 4,018,090 Grand Total 33,574,134 36,639,149 36,031,824 36,333,511 31 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023-2024 GENERAL FUND SUMMARY TOTAL EXPENSES BY DEPARTMENT AND EXP.TYPE Department Object 2022 Council 2023 Dept 2023 2024 Dept 2024 Account Adopted Original Proposed Admin Recommend Proposed Admin Recommend 45-APPLE VALLEY SENIOR CENTER PERSONNEL SERVICES 315,525 327,850 327,850 343,455 343,455 45-APPLE VALLEY SENIOR CENTER OPERATING COSTS 99,310 101,335 78,350 95,850 82,200 45-APPLE VALLEY SENIOR CENTER OTHER EXPENDITURES 800 500 1,200 1,550 1,550 45-APPLE VALLEY SENIOR CENTER CAPITAL OUTLAY - 55,000 - 340,000 - 45-APPLE VALLEY SENIOR CENTER EXPENDITURES 415,635 484,685 407,400 780,855 427,205 47-INSURANCE PERSONNEL SERVICES 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 47-INSURANCE OTHER EXPENDITURES 408,450 442,900 442,900 473,700 473,700 47-INSURANCE EXPENDITURES 420,450 454,900 454,900 485,700 485,700 48-CONTINGENCY&TRANSFERS PERSONNEL SERVICES - - - - - 48-CONTINGENCY&TRANSFERS OPERATING COSTS - - - - - 48-CONTINGENCY&TRANSFERS OTHER EXPENDITURES 126,212 81,335 82,670 81,335 150,530 48-CONTINGENCY&TRANSFERS TRANSFERS 4,005,000 4,452,000 4,352,000 5,115,000 4,905,000 48-CONTINGENCY&TRANSFERS EXPENDITURES 4,131,212 4,533,335 4,434,670 5,196,335 5,055,530 Grand Total 38,080,334 41,107,220 40,432,085 43,864,410 42,722,400 ... .... ..... ..• AppValley Notes: This page left intentionally blank 33 COMPANY DEPARTMENT BUSINESS UNIT ACTIVITY 1000 01 1005 Mayor& City Council DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY Mayor and Council reflects the expenses required to operate and maintain the Apple Valley City Council function. The Council is the policy-making body that governs the City and determines the scope of services provided by the City and the price of services to residents and service users. The individual members also represent the City on various joint powers boards and organizations including but not limited to: the League of Minnesota Cities, the National League of Cities, Metro Cities, the Municipal Legislative Commission, Metropolitan Airports Commission Noise Oversight Committee, Minnesota Valley Transit Authority, Dakota Communications Center Board, ALF Ambulance, Dakota Broadband Board, Minnesota Mayors Association, and Apple Valley Fire Relief Association. MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2023 and 2024 The councilmembers covered under this company consider policy issues throughout the year and provide direction to staff. The Council meets regularly twice per month with special meetings called as needed. 1. Provide policy directives for various issues pertaining to the governance of the City and its residents. 2. Determine appropriate services and taxation levels for each year's budgets. IMPACT MEASURES / PERFORMANCE INDICATORS - UPDATE Actual Actual Actual Projected Projected Projected Item 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Residents represented 54,400 55,500 56,155 Tbd Tbd Tbd City Market Value(in 1000's) 5,781,638 6,175,140 6,467,595 6,757,480 7,767,919 Tbd Gen Fund Budget overseen 33,796,940 35,385,705 36,333,511 38,080,334 40,432,085 42,722,400 Total All Budgeted Funds $84 million $91 million $88 million $91 million $89 million $98 million Moody's Bond Rating Aaa Aaa Aaa Aaa Aaa Aaa Standard &Poor's Bond Rating AM MA AM MA MA AM Parcels within the City 18,293 18,385 18,435 18,499 18,492 Tbd Residential parcels 17,846 17,899 17,899 18,005 18,010 Tbd Homesteaded parcels 15,565 15,696 15,686 15,725 15,318 Tbd Regular Status Personnel Schedule —FTE's Adopted Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Position Title 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Councilmember 5 5 5 5 5 5 34 Summary Budget Department 01 Mayor&Council 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Expenditures: Salaries&Wages 49,464 50,713 48,715 55,260 50,730 52,290 53,870 Employee Benefits 77,391 80,461 74,074 78,450 72,635 77,310 82,225 Supplies 815 280 302 625 625 625 625 Contractual Services 3,008 2,995 3,076 3,120 3,120 3,120 3,120 Training/Travel/Dues 12,114 5,751 1,459 20,540 17,790 17,790 18,290 Other Expenses 100 (250) 2,033 - - - - Capital Outlay - - - - - - Total Exp. 142,892 139,950 129,659 157,995 144,900 151,135 158,130 Net provision to(use of) general revenues (142,892) (139,950) (129,659) (157,995) (144,900) (151,135) (158,130) 2023 CAPITAL OUTLAY None 2024 CAPITAL OUTLAY None City of Apple Valley 35 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) MAYOR&CITY COUNCIL 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6110-SALARY-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 49,464 50,713 48,715 53,735 50,730 23,433 50,730 50,730 52,290 52,290 6123-SALARY-OTHER 1,525 0 1,560 1,560 1,580 1,580 6105-SALARIES AND WAGES 49,464 50,713 48,715 55,260 50,730 23,433 52,290 52,290 53,870 53,870 6138-MEDICARE 599 588 653 800 735 317 800 800 825 825 6139-FICA 1,241 1,173 1,221 2,150 1,750 633 1,915 1,915 1,970 1,970 6141-PENSIONS-PERA 2,702 2,772 2,310 3,280 2,535 1,063 2,505 2,505 2,580 2,580 6142-WORKERS COMPENSATION 189 207 220 250 230 108 265 265 285 285 6145-MEDICAL INSURANCE 74,014 79,889 67,083 78,370 71,985 26,958 76,525 76,525 81,265 81,265 6146-DENTAL INSURANCE 6,029 5,938 5,674 2,695 6147-LIFE INSURANCE-BASIC 30 30 31 47 6148-LIFE INSURANCE-SUPP/DEPEND 4,098 4,110 5,023 2,246 6170-EMPLOYEE PAID PREMIUMS -11,511 -14,246 -8,140 -6,400 -4,600 -1,343 -4,700 -4,700 -4,700 -4,700 6125-EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 77,391 80,461 74,074 78,450 72,635 32,724 77,310 77,310 82,225 82,225 6100-TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 126,855 131,174 122,790 133,710 123,365 56,157 129,600 129,600 136,095 136,095 6210-OFFICE SUPPLIES 259 130 42 200 200 137 200 200 200 200 6211-SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT 0 0 28 0 6229-GENERAL SUPPLIES 557 150 232 425 425 272 425 425 425 425 6205-SUPPLIES 815 280 302 625 625 409 625 625 625 625 6237-TELEPHONE/PAGERS 3,008 2,995 2,868 3,000 3,000 1,385 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 6239-PRINTING 0 0 208 120 120 0 120 120 120 120 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,008 2,995 3,076 3,120 3,120 1,385 3,120 3,120 3,120 3,120 6275-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXPLOCAL 1,563 40 1,429 1,335 1,335 390 1,335 1,335 1,335 1,335 6276-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP OTHER 7,681 4,618 0 15,500 13,500 2,415 13,500 13,500 14,000 14,000 6277-MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE 1,570 63 0 1,600 1,000 20 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6278-SUBSISTENCE ALLOWANCE 1,300 1,000 0 2,000 1,850 153 1,850 1,850 1,850 1,850 6280-DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 0 30 30 105 105 0 105 105 105 105 6270-TRNG/TRAVL/DUES/UNIF 12,114 5,751 1,459 20,540 17,790 2,978 17,790 17,790 18,290 18,290 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 15,937 9,026 4,837 24,285 21,535 4,772 21,535 21,535 22,035 22,035 6310-RENTAL EXPENSE 100 -250 186 0 6399-OTHER CHARGES 0 0 1,847 0 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES 100 -250 2,033 0 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES 100 -250 2,033 0 142,892 139,950 129,660 157,995 144,900 60,929 151,135 151,135 158,130 158,130 36 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 01: MAYOR&CITY COUNCIL-1005 COMPANY 1000: GENERAL FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND SALARIES 6110 Regular Employees 53,735 50,730 50,730 50,730 50,730 52,290 52,290 6123 Salary-Other 1,525 - 1,560 1,560 1,580 1,580 6138 Medicare 800 735 735 800 800 825 825 6139 FICA 2,150 1,750 1,750 1,915 1,915 1,970 1,970 6141 Pension-PERA 3,280 2,535 2,535 2,505 2,505 2,580 2,580 6142 Work Comp Insurance 250 230 230 265 265 285 285 6145 Hospital&Life Insurance 78,370 71,985 71,985 76,525 76,525 81,265 81,265 6170 Employee Paid Premiums (6,400) (4,600) (4,600) (4,700) (4,700) (4,700) (4,700) Position Changes - - - - Total 133,710 123,365 123,365 129,600 129,600 136,095 136,095 6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES 200 200 150 200 200 200 200 Total 200 200 150 200 200 200 200 6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES Miscellaneous 350 350 500 350 350 350 350 Council Shirts 75 75 75 75 75 75 Total 425 425 500 425 425 425 425 6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS Mobile Phone Stipend 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 Total 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 6239 PRINTING/PUBLISHING Miscellaneous(Business Cards) 120 120 210 120 120 120 120 Total 120 120 210 120 120 120 120 6275 SCHOOL/CONF/EXP-LOCAL Includes LMC,Metro Cites,and 725 725 725 725 725 725 725 other General Conference 130 130 130 130 130 130 130 and Workshop Expenses 130 130 130 130 130 130 130 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 Total 1,335 1,335 1,335 1,335 1,335 1,335 1,335 6276 SCHOOL/CONF/EXP-OTHER LMC Annual 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 NLC Spring(DC) 2,000 2,000 - 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 NLC Fall 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,500 8,500 NLC Board/Board Committees 2,000 - - - Mayor's Association 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 Total 15,500 13,500 11,500 13,500 13,500 14,000 14,000 6277 MILEAGE ALLOWANCE Miscellaneous Mileage 1,600 1,000 500 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Total 1,600 1,000 500 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6278 SUBSISTANCE ALLOWANCE NLC Spring(DC)@ 500 500 500 - 500 500 500 500 NLC Fall @$250 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 NLC Board/Board Committees 150 - - - LMC Annual @$150 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 Other Conferences - - - - Total 2,000 1,850 1,350 1,850 1,850 1,850 1,850 6280 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS Mayor Association Dues 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Miscellaneous 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 Total 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 Total Net of Personnel 24,285 21,535 18,650 21,535 21,535 22,035 22,035 TOTAL EXPENSES $ 157,995 $ 144,900 $ 142,015 $ 151,135 $ 151,135 $ 158,130 $ 158,130 37 COMPANY DEPARTMENT BUSINESS UNIT ACTIVITY 1000 02 1010 Administration DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY Administration reflects the expenses involved in the general administration of the City and its services. In addition to the activities involved in serving the City Council to carry out its directives and providing the ultimate supervisory authority for all of the individual departments, the Administration Department also has direct management responsibilities for information technologies, cable television, general City communications functions, budget development and management, capital improvement planning, website management, physical facility planning, energy management, facility security coordination, airport noise complaint coordination, and generally all issues that do not fall directly into individual departments. MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2023 and 2024 1. Develop balanced 2024 budget within financial parameters set by City Council. 2. Administer Council directives for service levels in response to economic conditions. 3. Develop 2024-2028 Capital Improvements Program. 4. Integration of Communications Specialist into department operations and activities to enhance customer experience with website. IMPACT MEASURES / PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual Actual Actual Adopted Projected Projected Item 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Full-time Employees 196 196 200 202 205 207 Gen Fund Budget Managed $33,796,940 $35,385,705 $36,333,511 $38,080,334 $40,432,085 $42,722,400 Total All Budgeted Funds $84 million $91 million $88 million $91 million $89 million $98 million Moody's Bond Rating Aaa Aaa Aaa Aaa Aaa Aaa Standard&Poor's Bond AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA Rating Regular Status Personnel Schedule—FTE's Adopted Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Position Title 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 City Administrator 1 1 1 1 1 1 Asst. City Administrator 1 1 1 1 1 1 Dept. Specialist 1 1 1 1 1 1 Communication Specialist 1 1 Temporary Status Personnel Schedule Adopted Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Position Title 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 None 38 Summary Budget Department 02 Administration 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Expenditures: Salaries&Wages 350,310 364,780 442,308 460,425 479,515 498,730 529,410 Employee Benefits 118,883 126,893 139,685 137,680 137,325 155,645 162,130 Supplies 75 361 744 175 175 175 175 Contractual Services 1,415 861 986 1,430 37,795 37,795 39,950 Training/Travel/Dues 12,923 6,687 8,200 14,725 15,285 20,285 20,125 Other Expenses - - - - - - - Capital Outlay - - - - - - Total Exp. 483,606 499,582 591,923 614,435 670,095 712,630 751,790 Net provision to(use of) general revenues (483,606) (499,582) (591,923) (614,435) (670,095) (712,630) (751,790) 2023 CAPITAL OUTLAY None 2024 CAPITAL OUTLAY None City of Apple Valley 39 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) ADMINISTRATION 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6110-SALARY-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 350,509 369,368 442,008 443,595 462,030 217,025 481,365 481,365 511,210 511,210 6112-SALARY-SEASONAL TEMP 324 0 0 6113-OVERTIME-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 0 697 473 668 6121-INSURANCE CASH BENEFIT 0 0 300 360 6122-COMP REQUEST -198 -5,609 -473 0 6123-SALARY-OTHER 16,830 17,485 17,365 17,365 18,200 18,200 6105-SALARIES AND WAGES 350,310 364,780 442,308 460,425 479,515 218,053 498,730 498,730 529,410 529,410 6138-MEDICARE 4,886 5,078 6,139 6,675 6,955 3,040 7,230 7,230 7,675 7,675 6139-FICA 19,577 20,287 24,406 26,800 27,410 12,999 28,415 28,415 28,875 28,875 6141-PENSIONS-PERA 26,199 27,195 31,656 34,530 35,965 16,241 37,405 37,405 39,705 39,705 6142-WORKERS COMPENSATION 1,960 2,160 2,777 2,870 3,015 1,523 3,665 3,665 4,100 4,100 6144-LONG-TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE 700 728 704 1,265 1,320 322 1,370 1,370 1,455 1,455 6145-MEDICAL INSURANCE 71,244 79,827 82,528 73,440 71,760 36,069 86,860 86,860 89,620 89,620 6146-DENTAL INSURANCE 4,694 4,708 4,969 2,420 6147-LIFE INSURANCE-BASIC 18 18 23 37 6148-LIFE INSURANCE-SUPP/DEPEND 915 941 1,574 751 6170-EMPLOYEE PAID PREMIUMS -11,360 -14,048 -15,092 -7,900 -9,100 -2,489 -9,300 -9,300 -9,300 -9,300 6125-EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 118,833 126,893 139,685 137,680 137,325 70,913 155,645 155,645 162,130 162,130 6100-TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 469,143 491,673 581,993 598,105 616,840 288,966 654,375 654,375 691,540 691,540 6210-OFFICE SUPPLIES 75 361 61 100 100 19 100 100 100 100 6211-SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT 0 0 68 0 6229-GENERAL SUPPLIES 0 0 615 75 75 68 75 75 75 75 6205-SUPPLIES 75 361 744 175 175 87 175 175 175 175 6237-TELEPHONE/PAGERS 718 861 935 630 995 498 995 995 950 950 6238-POSTAGE/UPS/FEDEX 13,000 13,000 13,000 14,000 14,000 6239-PRINTING 697 0 51 800 23,800 9,691 23,800 23,800 25,000 25,000 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,415 861 986 1,430 37,795 10,189 37,795 37,795 39,950 39,950 6260-REPAIRS AND MAINTENA 0 0 0 0 6275-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXPLOCAL 1,592 285 333 1,865 1,565 55 1,565 1,565 1,565 1,565 6276-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP OTHER 4,458 0 75 4,850 5,050 701 5,050 5,050 5,050 5,050 6277-MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE 4,620 4,620 4,627 4,670 5,120 2,351 5,120 5,120 5,120 5,120 6278-SUBSISTENCE ALLOWANCE 450 0 0 600 600 255 600 600 600 600 6280-DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 1,803 1,782 3,165 2,740 2,950 3,015 7,950 7,950 7,790 7,790 6270-TRNG/TRAVL/DUES/UNIF 12,923 6,687 8,200 14,725 15,285 6,377 20,285 20,285 20,125 20,125 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 14,412 7,909 9,930 16,330 53,255 16,653 58,255 58,255 60,250 60,250 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 6720-CAPITAL OUTLAY-FURNITURE&FIX 383 0 0 0 6701-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 383 0 0 0 6700-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 383 0 0 0 483,938 499,582 591,924 614,435 670,095 305,619 712,630 712,630 751,790 751,790 40 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 02: ADMINISTRATION-1010 COMPANY 1000: GENERAL FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND SALARIES 6110 Regular Employees 443,595 462,030 462,030 481,365 481,365 511,210 511,210 6123 Salaries-Other 16,830 17,485 17,485 17,365 17,365 18,200 18,200 6138 Medicare 6,675 6,955 6,955 7,230 7,230 7,675 7,675 6139 FICA 26,800 27,410 27,410 28,415 28,415 28,875 28,875 6141 Pension-PERA 34,530 35,965 35,965 37,405 37,405 39,705 39,705 6142 Work Comp Insurance 2,870 3,015 3,015 3,665 3,665 4,100 4,100 6144 Long-term Disability Insurance 1,265 1,320 1,320 1,370 1,370 1,455 1,455 6145 Hospital&Life Insurance 73,440 71,760 71,760 86,860 86,860 89,620 89,620 6170 Employee Paid Premiums (7,900) (9,100) (9,100) (9,300) (9,300) (9,300) (9,300) Total 598,105 616,840 616,840 654,375 654,375 691,540 691,540 6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES Miscellaneous 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES Various 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 Total 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS Mobile Phones 630 995 995 995 995 950 950 Total 630 995 995 995 995 950 950 6238 POSTAGE/UPS/FEDEX Miscellaneous(transferred from Park Adm.) - 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 14,000 14,000 Total - 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 14,000 14,000 6239 PRINTING/PUBLISHING Various 800 23,800 23,800 23,800 23,800 25,000 25,000 Total 800 23,800 23,800 23,800 23,800 25,000 25,000 6275 SCHOOL/CONF/EXP-LOCAL Workshops/Meetings 675 375 375 375 375 375 375 Other Local Training 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 Other Local Training 1,050 1,050 1,050 1,050 1,050 1,050 1,050 Total 1,865 1,565 1,565 1,565 1,565 1,565 1,565 6276 SCHOOL/CONF/EXP-OTHER NLC Fall 1,500 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 LMC 600 600 900 600 600 600 600 ICMA 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 MAGC - 100 100 100 100 100 100 MCMA(1 attendee @$880) 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Total 4,850 5,050 5,350 5,050 5,050 5,050 5,050 6277 MILEAGE ALLOWANCE Car Allowance($385 per month) 4,620 4,620 4,620 4,620 4,620 4,620 4,620 Other Mileage 50 500 500 500 500 500 500 Total 4,670 5,120 5,120 5,120 5,120 5,120 5,120 6278 SUBSISTANCE ALLOWANCE NLC Fall 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 LMC(1 @$150) 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 ICMA 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 Total 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 6280 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS MAMA 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 MCMA-Administrator 175 175 175 175 175 175 175 MCMA-Assistant 145 145 145 145 145 145 145 ICMA-Administrator 1,175 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 ICMA-Assistant 925 925 925 925 925 1,000 1,000 MAGC - 85 85 85 85 100 100 Communications Software Subscriptions - - 2,800 5,000 5,000 4,750 4,750 MPAL 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Rotary 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 Total 2,740 2,950 5,750 7,950 7,950 7,790 7,790 Total Net of Personnel 16,330 53,255 56,355 58,255 58,255 60,250 60,250 TOTAL EXPENSES ABOVE $ 614,435 $ 670,095 $ 673,195 $ 712,630 $ 712,630 $ 751,790 $ 751,790 41 COMPANY DEPARTMENT BUSINESS UNIT ACTIVITY 1000 03 1015 City Clerk/Elections DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY Carries out the duties of the City Clerk's office, as prescribed by State Statute, and manages all functions of the office, including: serving as the Clerk to the City Council; preparing official meeting agendas and minutes; publishing legal notices; conducting bid openings; processing contracts and agreements; administering issuance of municipal licenses; filing insurance claims; filing certified documents with the County and other agencies; coordinating the election process; coordinating auctions; and maintaining official records and files for the City. MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2023 AND 2024 In addition to the regular and recurring duties assigned to the City Clerk's office, in 2023 the 20th major supplement of the Code of Ordinances will be prepared and distributed. A primary objective for 2024 will be to prepare for and administer the Presidential Primary, State Primary, and General Elections, including securing polling sites, recruiting and training judges, testing election equipment, ordering supplies, and coordinating the absentee ballot and early voting processes. IMPACT MEASURES / PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual Actual Actual Projected Projected Projected Item 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Agenda Packets & Minutes 23 24 24 24 24 24 Resolutions 174 179 216 180 180 180 Ordinances 17 13 21 15 15 15 Public Hearing Notices 27 30 39 35 35 35 Legal Ads 53 60 66 60 60 60 Licenses & Permits 303 349 286 325 300 325 Insurance Claims 76 72 49 60 60 60 Agreements/Contracts 98 82 125 90 90 90 Change Orders 24 24 19 20 20 20 Bid Openings 10 10 14 10 10 10 Elections 0 3 0 2 1 3 Total Voters - Primary N/A 7,665 N/A 8,000 N/A 9,000 Total Voters - General N/A 33,904 N/A 29,000 20,000 35,000 Election Day Regist.- Primary N/A 186 N/A 250 N/A 250 Election Day Regist- General N/A 2,531 N/A 2,400 800 2,600 Absentee Ballots- Primary N/A 4,787 N/A 4,500 N/A 5,500 Absentee Ballots - General N/A 22,381 N/A 20,000 12,000 26,000 CUP's/IUP's Filed 3 2 7 3 3 3 Vacations Filed 0 0 2 2 2 2 Auctions 4 4 3 5 5 5 Scanned Documents 28,660 12,710 25,215 20,000 20,000 20,000 Regular Status Personnel Schedule- FTE's 42 Adopted Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Position Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 City Clerk 1 1 1 1 1 1 Division Specialist 1 1 1 1 1 1 Part-time Status Personnel Schedule- Hours (*) Actual Actual Actual Proposed Proposed Proposed Position Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Election Assistants 0 3,375 0 2,900 1,600 3,600 Head Election Judges 0 2,100 0 1,600 800 2,200 Election Judges 0 5,200 0 4,800 2,300 5,600 Summary Budget Department 03 -City Clerk/ Elections 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Revenue: License: 4030 TOBACCO 11,539 510 11,952 5,865 5,865 6,100 6,100 4031 TRASH COLLECTION 4,700 7,935 5,615 6,475 6,500 5,650 5,665 4033 FUEL 13,580 10,860 8,166 13,150 14,050 13,800 13,900 4034 LIQUOR/WINE 111,000 115,035 85,460 88,000 120,000 158,950 162,960 4035 BEER ON&OFF 24,160 2,400 7,000 5,150 4,900 4,900 4,900 4036 PEDDLER/SOLICITOR 10,790 16,500 10,330 11,500 8,100 10,575 11,440 4037 VENDING MACHINES 1,965 1,800 - 1,100 - - - 4038 MASSAGE THERAPY 5,113 2,927 3,492 1,000 3,400 3,250 3,300 4049 LICENSE-OTHER 3,522 6,533 9,218 2,000 2,300 3,450 3,450 8205 AUCTION SALES 9,688 - 55,751 24,000 22,000 47,300 48,700 196,057 164,500 196,984 158,240 187,115 253,975 260,415 Expenditures: Salaries&Wages 159,622 292,594 184,415 181,525 346,550 280,610 422,660 Emp.Benefits 56,716 68,118 62,905 59,120 67,450 70,145 86,060 Supplies 967 8,111 1,054 700 4,500 2,000 5,200 Contractual Serv. 7,589 35,326 5,638 9,750 15,600 13,600 17,000 Repairs&Maint. 4,412 10,723 4,537 17,100 18,170 18,500 29,900 Training/Travel/Dues 62,973 60,139 62,165 65,000 67,135 71,600 70,590 Other Exp. 1,700 949 1,600 3,100 3,100 1,600 5,000 Capital outlay - - - - - - Total Exp 293,979 475,960 322,314 336,295 522,505 458,055 636,410 Net addition to(use of) (97,922) (311,460) (125,330) (178,055) (335,390) (204,080) (375,995) general revenues 2023 CAPITAL OUTLAY: None 2024 CAPITAL OUTLAY: None City of Apple Valley 43 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6110-SALARY-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 159,226 159,447 183,983 173,360 178,560 83,470 185,765 185,765 191,340 191,340 6111-SALARY PART-TIME 0 2,871 0 0 6112-SALARY-SEASONAL TEMP 198 109,771 5 0 142,600 80 72,300 72,300 185,600 185,600 6113-OVERTIME-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 318 20,944 641 3,000 20,000 71 17,000 17,000 40,000 40,000 6114-OVERTIME PART-TIME EMPLOYEES 0 96 0 0 6119-ANNUAL LEAVE 1,886 6122-COMP REQUEST -119 -1,615 -213 -71 6123-SALARY-OTHER 5,165 5,390 5,545 5,545 5,720 5,720 6124-OVERTIME-SEASONAL TEMP 0 1,078 0 0 6105-SALARIES AND WAGES 159,622 292,594 184,415 181,525 346,550 85,436 280,610 280,610 422,660 422,660 6138-MEDICARE 2,002 3,102 2,298 2,630 3,845 1,066 4,070 4,070 6,130 6,130 6139-FICA 8,558 13,265 9,825 11,255 16,425 4,558 17,400 17,400 26,205 26,205 6141-PENSIONS-PERA 11,895 14,580 13,274 13,615 15,295 6,334 15,625 15,625 17,780 17,780 6142-WORKERS COMPENSATION 955 1,880 1,220 1,200 2,300 573 1,865 1,865 2,945 2,945 6144-LONG-TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE 328 343 297 500 505 126 525 525 540 540 6145-MEDICAL INSURANCE 37,842 41,488 43,532 36,720 35,880 16,660 37,560 37,560 39,360 39,360 6146-DENTAL INSURANCE 3,129 3,139 3,129 1,430 6147-LIFE INSURANCE-BASIC 12 12 13 19 6170-EMPLOYEE PAID PREMIUMS -8,006 -9,691 -10,682 -6,800 -6,800 -1,758 -6,900 -6,900 -6,900 -6,900 6125-EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 56,716 68,118 62,905 59,120 67,450 29,007 70,145 70,145 86,060 86,060 6100-TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 216,338 360,712 247,320 240,645 414,000 114,443 350,755 350,755 508,720 508,720 6210-OFFICE SUPPLIES 103 633 375 400 1,550 34 650 650 1,700 1,700 6211-SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 154 6229-GENERAL SUPPLIES 864 7,478 679 300 2,950 0 1,350 1,350 3,500 3,500 6205-SUPPLIES 967 8,111 1,054 700 4,500 188 2,000 2,000 5,200 5,200 6236-ELECTION JUDGE PAYMENTS 0 29,200 0 0 0 0 6239-PRINTING 3,209 3,831 3,676 5,300 11,050 1,334 9,050 9,050 12,200 12,400 6249-OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,380 2,295 1,962 4,450 4,550 495 4,550 4,550 4,600 4,600 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 7,589 35,326 5,638 9,750 15,600 1,829 13,600 13,600 16,800 17,000 6265-REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 4,412 10,723 4,537 17,100 18,170 11,025 18,500 18,500 18,500 29,900 6260-REPAIRS AND MAINTENA 4,412 10,723 4,537 17,100 18,170 11,025 18,500 18,500 18,500 29,900 6275-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXPLOCAL 140 0 0 1,200 1,200 0 1,900 1,900 4,900 4,900 6276-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXPOTHER 2,679 0 1,136 1,800 1,800 0 4,600 4,600 0 0 6277-MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE 196 475 0 400 975 0 725 725 1,175 1,175 6278-SUBSISTENCE ALLOWANCE 400 0 50 400 400 0 400 400 400 400 6280-DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 59,559 59,664 60,979 61,200 62,760 23,836 63,975 63,975 64,115 64,115 6270-TRNG/TRAVL/DUES/UNIF 62,973 60,139 62,165 65,000 67,135 23,836 71,600 71,600 70,590 70,590 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 75,940 114,299 73,394 92,550 105,405 36,878 105,700 105,700 111,090 122,690 6310-RENTAL EXPENSE 1,700 950 1,600 3,100 3,100 0 1,600 1,600 5,000 5,000 6333-GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS 0 -1 0 0 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES 1,700 949 1,600 3,100 3,100 0 1,600 1,600 5,000 5,000 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES 1,700 949 1,600 3,100 3,100 0 1,600 1,600 5,000 5,000 6701-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 0 0 0 0 0 0 6700-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 0 0 0 0 0 0 293,978 475,960 322,314 336,295 522,505 151,321 458,055 458,055 624,810 636,410 44 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 03: CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS-1015 COMPANY 1000: GENERAL FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACCT DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND REVENUE 4030 License-Tobacco(Collected Even Years) 5,865 5,865 5,865 6,100 6,100 6,100 6,100 4031 License-Refuse 6,475 6,500 6,500 5,650 5,650 5,665 5,665 4033 License-Fuel 13,150 14,050 14,050 13,800 13,800 13,900 13,900 4034 License-Liquor/Wine On Sale 88,000 120,000 147,860 158,950 158,950 162,960 162,960 4035 License-Beer On&Off Sale 5,150 4,900 4,900 4,900 4,900 4,900 4,900 4036 License-Peddler/Solicitor 11,500 8,100 8,100 10,575 10,575 11,440 11,440 4037 License-Coin Operated Machines 1,100 - - - - 4038 License-Massage Therapy 1,000 3,400 3,400 3,250 3,250 3,300 3,300 4049 License-Other 2,000 2,300 2,300 3,450 3,450 3,450 3,450 8205 Auction Sales 24,000 22,000 22,000 27,300 27,300 28,700 28,700 Total 158,240 187,115 214,975 233,975 233,975 240,415 240,415 6110 SALARIES Regular Employees 173,360 178,560 178,560 185,765 185,765 191,340 191,340 6112 *Salary-Seasonal Temp - 61,000 61,000 - - - - 6112 *Head Judges 1,600 hours @$15.00 - 24,000 24,000 - - - - 6112 *Other Judges 4,800 hours @$12.00 - 57,600 57,600 - - - - 6112 *Election Assistants 1,600 hours @$19.00 30,400 30,400 - - 6112 *Head Judges 800 hours @$15.00 - - - 12,000 12,000 - - 6112 *Other Judges 2,300 hours @$13.00 1 - - - 29,900 29,900 - - 6112 *Election Assistants 3,600 hours @$20.00 - - 72,000 72,000 6112 *Head Judges 2,200 hours @$16.00 - - 35,200 35,200 6112 *Other Judges 5,600 hours @$14.00 - - 78,400 78,400 6113 Overtime-Reg 3,000 20,000 20,000 17,000 17,000 40,000 40,000 6123 Salaries-Other 5,165 5,390 5,390 5,545 5,545 5,720 5,720 6138 Medicare 2,630 3,845 3,845 4,070 4,070 6,130 6,130 6139 FICA 11,255 16,425 16,425 17,400 17,400 26,205 26,205 6141 Pension-PERA 13,615 15,295 15,295 15,625 15,625 17,780 17,780 6142 Work Comp Ins 1,200 2,300 2,300 1,865 1,865 2,945 2,945 6144 Long-term Disability Insurance 500 505 505 525 525 540 540 6145 Hospital&Life Insurance 36,720 35,880 35,880 37,560 37,560 39,360 39,360 6170 Employee Paid Premiums (6,800) (6,800) (6,800) (6,900) (6,900) (6,900) (6,900) Total 240,645 414,000 414,000 350,755 350,755 508,720 508,720 6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES Miscellaneous 400 550 550 400 400 600 600 *Polling Place/Election Supplies - 1,000 1,000 250 250 1,100 1,100 Total 400 1,550 1,550 650 650 1,700 1,700 6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES Miscellaneous 300 450 450 350 350 500 500 *Polling Place Supplies&Signs& - 2,500 2,500 1,000 1,000 3,000 3,000 Various Election Supplies Total 300 2,950 2,950 1,350 1,350 3,500 3,500 6239 PRINTING/PUBLISHING Legal Notices 3,800 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 Dakota County Filing Fees 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,100 1,100 Business Card Stock,Misc. 500 550 550 550 550 550 550 *Election Judge Manuals - - - - - - - *General Election Ballots - 2,000 2,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 *Election Postal Verification Cards - 3,000 3,000 - - 3,000 3,000 *Maps - 500 700 500 500 550 750 Total 5,300 11,050 11,250 9,050 9,050 12,200 12,400 6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES Update Codification of Ordinances 3,900 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,050 4,050 Host City Code on Web Site 550 550 550 550 550 550 550 Total 4,450 4,550 4,550 4,550 4,550 4,600 4,600 6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT Office Equipment Repairs 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 *Annual Maintenance for Poll Pads(68) 7,000 7,000 6,500 7,000 7,000 7,000 18,400 Dominion Election Equipment(16) 9,900 10,970 11,025 11,300 11,300 11,300 11,300 Total 17,100 18,170 17,725 18,500 18,500 18,500 29,900 6275 SCHOOL/CONF/EXP-LOCAL Workshops 900 800 400 900 900 900 900 Meetings 200 200 200 300 300 300 300 *iTacit Election Judge On-Line Training 2,400 500 500 3,500 3,500 Other 100 200 200 200 200 200 200 Total 1,200 1,200 3,200 1,900 1,900 4,900 4,900 6276 SCHOOL/CONF/EXP-OTHER MCFOA 1,800 1,800 - 2,300 2,300 - - IIMC - - - 2,300 2,300 - - Total 1,800 1,800 - 4,600 4,600 - - 1 45 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 03: CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS-1015 COMPANY 1000: GENERAL FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACCT DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND 6277 MILEAGE ALLOWANCE Allowance,Clerk 400 425 425 425 425 425 425 *Mileage,Election Judges&Employee: - 550 550 300 300 750 750 *PNP Reimbursement - - - - - - Total 400 975 975 725 725 1,175 1,175 6278 SUBSISTENCE ALLOWANCE MCFOA,IIMC,LMC 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 Total 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 6280 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS IIMC 210 345 345 345 345 345 345 MCFOA 90 90 90 185 185 185 185 LMC Directory 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 Other 300 300 300 302 302 309 309 NLC Dues 4,002 4,110 4,110 4,045 4,045 4,050 4,050 LMC Dues 32,778 34,089 34,089 35,272 35,272 35,400 35,400 Metro Cities Dues 13,000 13,006 13,006 13,006 13,006 13,006 13,006 Municipal Legislative Commission 10,500 10,500 10,500 10,500 10,500 10,500 10,500 Dakota Co.Historical Society 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 AV Trademark - - - - - - - Total 61,200 62,760 62,760 63,975 63,975 64,115 64,115 6310 RENTAL EXPENSE *Polling Places 1,900 1,900 1,900 1,000 1,000 3,200 3,200 *Van/Trailer for Set-Up 1,200 1,200 1,200 600 600 1,800 1,800 Total 3,100 3,100 3,100 1,600 1,600 5,000 5,000 Total Net of Personnel 95,650 108,505 108,460 107,300 107,300 116,090 127,690 TOTAL EXPENSES $ 336,295 $ 522,505 $ 522,460 $ 458,055 $ 458,055 $ 624,810 $ 636,410 46 ••• •••• ••••• ••• AppValley Notes: 47 COMPANY DEPARTMENT BUSINESS UNIT ACTIVITY 1000 — General Fund 04 1020/1021 Human Resources/Front Desk DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY The Human Resources Department serves as a strategic partner in support of the City's mission to promote a team philosophy within the organization and develop a quality workplace together. Our core services and competencies include recruitment and staffing, employee relations, organizational and employee development, safety and health programs, compensation and benefits, payroll, policy and procedure development and administration, and regulatory compliance. MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2023 /2024 • Update DOT drug and alcohol testing policy, procedures, and supervisor training • Initiate NEOGOV hiring requisition and approval process • Establish City-wide safety committee IMPACT MEASURES / PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual Actual Actual Projected Projected Projected ITEM 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Employment actions processed 418 189 289 350 400 400 New hires 202 81 211 200 200 200 Rehires 160 73 130 150 150 150 Other: promotion,transfer,status change,term 56 35 48 50 50 50 Employment applications processed 2,629 1,591 1,635 1,500 1,500 1,500 Checks generated 10,435 9,342 10.036 10,200 10,200 10,200 W-2s generated 718 563 680 750 750 750 Section 125 enrollment savings $37,759 $41,658 $43,640 $45,000 $48,000 $48,000 Benefit enrollments/changes processed Mid-year 81 76 96 75 75 75 New Year Open Enrollment: Medical/Dental/Life/FSA/HSA 109 145 101 134 150 150 1094-C's Generated 214 242 246 250 250 250 Actual Actual Actual Projected Projected Projected ITEM 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 OUTCOME MEASURES Days to fill vacancies 62 88 96 85 85 85 Turnover rate Full-Time Regular 8.04% 10.00% 8.96% 8.00% 8.00% 8.00% Part-Time Regular 15.00% 0.00% 10.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% Part-Time Liquor Operations 65.71% 31.43% 54.29% 50.00% 50.00% 50.00% Paid-on-Call Firefighters 9.33% 2.67% 6.67% 8.00% 8.00% 8.00% Health claims experience 99.10% 89.08% 89.86% 90.00% 90.00% 90.00% Safety metrics Workers'comp.experience modifier .83 1.2 1.2 .99 .99 .99 Days away from work 292 282 83 50 50 50 Restricted days 488 140 287 50 50 50 Volunteer Engagement City-Wide Volunteer Hours 5,553 2,918 3,539 4,000 5,000 5,000 Equivalent Wages Value $141,213 $79,370 $101,003 $110,000 $125,000 $125,000 48 Regular Status Personnel Schedule-FTE's Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Proposed Position Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 1 HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGER 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 DEPARTMENT SPECIALIST 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 HR COORDINATOR 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 PAYROLL COORDINATOR 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 RECEPTIONIST 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Temporary Status Personnel Schedule - Hours (Part Time) Adopted Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Position Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 None Summary Budget Department 04 Human Resources 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Expenditures: Salaries&Wages 386,538 405,397 427,272 427,610 439,080 453,475 468,770 Employee Benefits 123,165 131,707 134,040 144,845 148,775 146,665 153,855 Supplies 631 497 399 650 650 650 650 Contractual Services 25,546 24,568 24,763 37,350 37,650 40,150 40,650 Training/Travel/Dues 6,276 2,090 3,013 5,315 5,405 5,405 5,405 Other Expenses 28,668 23,257 16,924 33,200 34,700 34,700 35,650 Capital Outlay 1,738 - - - - - 572,562 587,517 606,411 648,970 666,260 681,045 704,980 Net addition to(use of) (572,562) (587,517) (606,411) (648,970) (666,260) (681,045) (704,980) general revenues 2023 CAPITAL OUTLAY: N/A 2024 CAPITAL OUTLAY: N/A City of Apple Valley 49 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) HUMAN RESOURCES/FRONT DESK 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6110-SALARY-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 381,675 406,717 406,130 406,970 418,960 198,065 433,460 433,460 448,080 448,080 6113-OVERTIME-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 6,418 3,014 4,589 6,000 6,000 2,040 6,000 6,000 6,200 6,200 6120-EMPLOYMENT AGENCIES 0 0 17,052 0 6121-INSURANCE CASH BENEFIT 1,920 2,040 1,860 1,440 6122-COMP REQUEST -3,476 -6,374 -2,359 -1,793 6123-SALARY-OTHER 14,640 14,120 14,015 14,015 14,490 14,490 6105-SALARIES AND WAGES 386,538 405,397 427,272 427,610 439,080 199,752 453,475 453,475 468,770 468,770 6138-MEDICARE 5,113 5,467 5,614 6,200 6,370 2,810 6,575 6,575 6,800 6,800 6139-FICA 22,537 23,211 24,003 26,510 27,225 12,016 28,115 28,115 28,895 28,895 6141-PENSIONS-PERA 28,846 30,274 30,611 32,070 32,930 14,873 34,010 34,010 35,160 35,160 6142-WORKERS COMPENSATION 2,373 2,532 2,693 2,820 2,915 1,330 3,010 3,010 3,265 3,265 6144-LONG-TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE 761 811 678 1,175 1,190 295 1,230 1,230 1,270 1,270 6145-MEDICAL INSURANCE 69,722 79,397 76,401 78,370 80,845 25,504 76,525 76,525 81,265 81,265 6146-DENTAL INSURANCE 7,252 6,800 6,635 3,135 6147-LIFE INSURANCE-BASIC 28 29 31 47 6148-LIFE INSURANCE-SUPP/DEPEND 881 834 1,162 1,287 6170-EMPLOYEE PAID PREMIUMS -14,348 -17,648 -13,787 -2,300 -2,700 -985 -2,800 -2,800 -2,800 -2,800 6125-EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 123,165 131,707 134,040 144,845 148,775 60,312 146,665 146,665 153,855 153,855 6100-TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 509,702 537,105 561,312 572,455 587,855 260,064 600,140 600,140 622,625 622,625 6210-OFFICE SUPPLIES 631 322 314 500 500 142 500 500 500 500 6211-SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 6229-GENERAL SUPPLIES 0 176 86 150 150 156 150 150 150 150 6205-SUPPLIES 631 497 399 650 650 298 650 650 650 650 6235-CONSULTANT SERVICES 19,507 18,222 17,998 30,500 30,500 5,332 31,000 31,000 31,000 31,000 6238-POSTAGE/UPS/FEDEX 0 41 41 150 150 0 150 150 150 150 6239-PRINTING 484 250 184 500 500 809 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6249-OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,555 6,055 6,539 6,200 6,500 7,999 8,000 8,000 8,500 8,500 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 25,546 24,568 24,763 37,350 37,650 14,141 40,150 40,150 40,650 40,650 6260-REPAIRS AND MAINTENA 0 0 0 0 6275-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL 3,172 40 395 2,000 2,000 150 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 6276-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP OTHER 820 0 852 1,000 1,000 0 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6277-MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE 512 0 57 300 300 0 300 300 300 300 6280-DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 1,773 2,050 1,709 2,015 2,105 1,689 2,105 2,105 2,105 2,105 6270-TRNG/TRAVL/DUES/UNIF 6,276 2,090 3,013 5,315 5,405 1,839 5,405 5,405 5,405 5,405 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 32,454 27,155 28,175 43,315 43,705 16,277 46,205 46,205 46,705 46,705 6399-OTHER CHARGES 28,668 23,257 16,924 33,200 34,700 1,996 36,700 34,700 35,650 35,650 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES 28,668 23,257 16,924 33,200 34,700 1,996 36,700 34,700 35,650 35,650 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES 28,668 23,257 16,924 33,200 34,700 1,996 36,700 34,700 35,650 35,650 6725-CAPITAL OUTLAY-OFFICE EQUIP 1,738 0 0 0 0 1,751 2,750 0 0 0 6701-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,738 0 0 0 0 1,751 2,750 0 0 0 6700-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,738 0 0 0 0 1,751 2,750 0 0 0 572,562 587,517 606,411 648,970 666,260 280,088 685,795 681,045 704,980 704,980 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET 50 ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 04: HUMAN RESOURCES/FRONT DESK-1020&1021 COMPANY 1000: GENERAL FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROPOSED RECOMMEND PROPOSED RECOMMEND SALARIES 6110 Regular Employees 406,970 418,960 418,960 433,460 433,460 448,080 448,080 6113 Overtime-Reg 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,200 6,200 6123 Salaries-Other 14,640 14,120 14,120 14,015 14,015 14,490 14,490 6138 Medicare 6,200 6,370 6,370 6,575 6,575 6,800 6,800 6139 FICA 26,510 27,225 27,225 28,115 28,115 28,895 28,895 6141 Pension-PERA 32,070 32,930 32,930 34,010 34,010 35,160 35,160 6142 Work Comp Insurance 2,820 2,915 2,915 3,010 3,010 3,265 3,265 6144 Long-term Disability Insurance 1,175 1,190 1,190 1,230 1,230 1,270 1,270 6145 Hospital&Life Insurance 78,370 80,845 76,845 76,525 76,525 81,265 81,265 6170 Employee Paid Premiums (2,300) (2,700) (2,700) (2,800) (2,800) (2,800) (2,800) Position Changes - - Total 572,455 587,855 583,855 600,140 600,140 622,625 622,625 6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES Miscellaneous 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 Total 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES Miscellaneous 150 150 200 150 150 150 150 Total 150 150 200 150 150 150 150 6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES Staff Training and Development 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Short-Term Disability Case Manager 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 Other(Special Legal) 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 Other(Special Selection) 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Safety Consultant 4,500 4,500 8,200 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Total 30,500 30,500 34,200 31,000 31,000 31,000 31,000 6238 POSTAGE/UPS/FEDEX Courier/Other 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 Total 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 6239 PRINTING/PUBLISHING City Wide Recruitment(Ads,etc.) 500 500 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Total 500 500 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES NEOGov Software Maintenance 6,200 6,500 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,500 8,500 Total 6,200 6,500 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,500 8,500 6275 SCHOOL/CONF/EXP-LOCAL Staff Training and Development - - - - - - - Miscellaneous Workshops 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Total 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 6276 SCHOOL/CONF/EXP-OTHER MPELRA Summer Conference 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Total 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6277 MILEAGE ALLOWANCE Miscellaneous Mileage 300 300 150 300 300 300 300 Total 300 300 150 300 300 300 300 6280 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS N/MPELRA 230 250 250 250 250 250 250 IPMA-National 160 175 175 175 175 175 175 IPMA-Local chapter 25 30 30 30 30 30 30 APA-National 220 250 250 250 250 250 250 APA-Local chapter 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 SHRM 230 250 250 250 250 250 250 MN Safety Counci 600 625 625 625 625 625 625 Miscellaneous Publication; 500 475 475 475 475 475 475 Total 2,015 2,105 2,105 2,105 2,105 2,105 2,105 6399 OTHER CHARGES Recognition Program(1025.6399) 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 Recognition Event(1025.6399; 3,000 3,000 1,500 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 Employee Gatherings 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 Volunteer Coordinator Prograrr 18,000 19,000 19,000 19,000 19,000 19,950 19,950 Safety Committee 5,000 5,500 5,500 7,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 Total 33,200 34,700 33,200 36,700 34,700 35,650 35,650 6725 CAPITAL OUTLAY-OFFICE EQUIP Ergo workstation improvements-Front Desk 750 - - - Chairs(2) 1,800 2,000 - - - Total 1,800 2,750 - - - Total Net of Personnel 76,515 78,405 84,305 85,655 80,905 82,355 82,355 TOTAL EXPENSES 648,970 666,260 668,160 685,795 681,045 704,980 704,980 51 COMPANY DEPARTMENT BUSINESS UNIT ACTIVITY 1000 05 1030 Information Technology DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY The Information Technology division is responsible for enabling and enhancing efficient business processes through the adoption and management of technology-related resources. The division's core services include user application support, workstation provisioning and management, wired and wireless network and infrastructure administration, software lifecycle management, security and risk management, telecommunications administration, print and media management, and backup and recovery services. MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2023 & 2024 In addition to the routine daily assignments and daily care and maintenance of hardware, software, network infrastructure, and user support; the following highlights major goals of the Information Technology division for 2023 and 2024: 2023 • Upgrade and replace the city's primary network firewalls. • Upgrade and replace approximately 50 desktop and laptop computer workstations as part of the lifecycle management plan. • Upgrade and replace approximately 12 network closet switches as anticipated in the lifecycle management plan. • Upgrade and replace numerous mobile devices as part of the lifecycle management plan. • Upgrade and enhance wireless access system. 2024 • Implement a new backup appliance for data redundancy and resiliency. • Upgrade and replace approximately 50 desktop and laptop computer workstations as part of the lifecycle management plan. • Upgrade and replace data center UPS power backup system. • Upgrade and replace numerous mobile devices as part of the lifecycle management plan. • Upgrade and enhance wireless access system. IMPACT MEASURES / PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual Actual Actual Adopted Projected Projected Item 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 User accounts 288 293 309 314 316 320 Desktops and Laptops supported 285 315 315 320 325 325 Servers supported 22 23 23 25 25 25 Network nodes (firewalls, switches, 76 88 113 123 130 130 APs, WLCs, bridges, etc.) Mobile devices supported 120 122 135 140 144 144 Help Desk requests resolved 1084 1108 1175 1190 1180 1180 52 Regular Status Personnel Schedule-FTE's Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Position Title 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 IT Manager 1 1 1 1 1 Systems Analyst 2 2 2 2 2 IT Specialist 1 1 1 1 1 IT Support Technician 1 1 1 1 1 Temporary Status Personnel Schedule Position Title 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 Summer IT Intern 0 1 0 0 0 BUDGET SUMMARY: Summary Budget Department 05 Information Technology 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Proposed Proposed Proposed Expenditures: Salaries&Wages 404,525 464,166 486,175 488,690 507,990 525,240 540,850 Employee Benefits 128,642 147,608 153,127 154,640 154,749 157,700 165,090 Supplies 7,900 7,741 9,536 8,800 8,000 8,700 8,700 Contractual Services 229,749 104,559 204,154 235,905 332,425 345,800 348,600 Repairs&Maintenance 10,097 13,355 12,419 14,200 14,200 14,200 14,200 Training/Travel/Dues 11,811 11,466 7,633 27,010 18,460 17,460 17,460 Other Expenses 11,717 8,764 8,768 9,300 9,000 9,000 9,000 Capital Outlay 146,596 66,656 89,236 184,000 246,000 187,800 209,400 Net addition to(use of)general 951,036 824,315 971,048 1,122,545 1,290,824 1,265,900 1,313,300 revenues CAPITAL OUTLAY: UPDATE 2021 2022 2023 2024 ADOPTED ADOPTED PROPOSED PROPOSED CAPITAL OUTLAY-OFFICE EQUIP CONT. Server/Workstation Hardware Upgrades 56,000 50,000 87,900 87,900 Cisco Networking Switch Upgrades/Replacements 90,000 90,000 35,400 35,400 Public Safety Rugged Laptops - 98,000 - - Network Security/Firewall/VPN 12,000 - 13,000 - Backup Appliance - - 25,000 Cisco Wireless Access Points/Mgmt. 8,000 8,000 13,000 8,600 Conference Room Equipment - - 4,000 8,000 UPS Replacement 12,000 - 9,000 19,000 Enhanced Endpoint Security Licenses 6,000 - - Milestone Axis Camera Replacements - - 25,500 25,500 Total 184,000 246,000 187,800 209,400 City of Apple Valley 53 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6110-SALARY-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 401,613 459,355 482,711 465,735 485,605 238,955 505,700 504,860 521,270 521,270 6112-SALARY-SEASONAL TEMP 274 485 0 0 0 0 6113-OVERTIME-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 3,789 4,826 4,848 4,000 4,000 1,266 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 6121-INSURANCE CASH BENEFIT 300 720 720 720 6122-COMP REQUEST -1,452 -1,219 -2,104 -232 6123-SALARY-OTHER 18,955 18,385 15,805 16,380 15,580 15,580 6105-SALARIES AND WAGES 404,525 464,166 486,175 488,690 507,990 240,709 525,505 525,240 540,850 540,850 6138-MEDICARE 5,642 6,458 6,765 7,085 7,365 3,383 7,620 7,615 7,840 7,840 6139-FICA 24,123 27,614 28,925 30,300 31,495 14,464 32,580 32,565 33,535 33,535 6141-PENSIONS-PERA 30,235 34,659 36,343 36,650 38,100 17,311 39,415 39,390 40,560 40,560 6142-WORKERS COMPENSATION 2,319 2,799 3,106 3,110 3,260 1,598 3,540 3,725 4,030 4,030 6144-LONG-TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE 804 924 810 1,345 1,385 344 1,435 1,435 1,475 1,475 6145-MEDICAL INSURANCE 73,986 88,605 93,645 82,850 80,844 33,490 84,890 80,870 85,550 85,550 6146-DENTAL INSURANCE 5,565 5,915 5,857 2,255 6147-LIFE INSURANCE-BASIC 27 30 33 47 6148-LIFE INSURANCE-SUPP/DEPEND 150 127 144 248 6170-EMPLOYEE PAID PREMIUMS -14,208 -19,523 -22,500 -6,700 -7,700 -3,078 -7,900 -7,900 -7,900 -7,900 6125-EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 128,642 147,608 153,127 154,640 154,749 70,060 161,580 157,700 165,090 165,090 6100-TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 533,166 611,774 639,302 643,330 662,739 310,769 687,085 682,940 705,940 705,940 6210-OFFICE SUPPLIES 831 233 260 800 500 0 200 200 200 200 6211-SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT 6,119 6,371 7,987 8,000 7,000 2,358 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 6215-EQUIPMENT-PARTS 151 576 1,181 374 6229-GENERAL SUPPLIES 799 561 107 0 500 179 500 500 500 500 6205-SUPPLIES 7,900 7,741 9,536 8,800 8,000 2,911 8,700 8,700 8,700 8,700 6235-CONSULTANT SERVICES 11,989 19,587 41,586 23,400 58,400 30,292 58,400 58,400 58,400 58,400 6237-TELEPHONE/PAGERS 19,006 13,256 18,802 20,100 16,960 8,405 17,000 17,000 17,000 17,000 6238-POSTAGE/UPS/FEDEX 750 0 0 200 200 0 200 200 200 200 6240-CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE 788 0 0 600 600 765 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6249-OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 197,216 71,716 143,765 191,605 256,265 241,456 269,200 269,200 272,000 272,000 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 229,749 104,559 204,154 235,905 332,425 280,917 345,800 345,800 348,600 348,600 6265-REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 10,097 13,355 11,919 14,200 14,200 5,020 14,200 14,200 14,200 14,200 6266-REPAIRS-BUILDING 500 0 6260-REPAIRS AND MAINTENA 10,097 13,355 12,419 14,200 14,200 5,020 14,200 14,200 14,200 14,200 6275-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL 0 0 975 6,400 4,000 0 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 6276-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP OTHER 7,599 0 0 12,000 6,000 2,879 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 6277-MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE 3,512 3,529 3,480 4,260 4,260 1,725 4,260 4,260 4,260 4,260 6278-SUBSISTENCE ALLOWANCE 700 0 0 750 600 0 600 600 600 600 6280-DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 0 7,937 3,178 3,600 3,600 20 600 600 600 600 6270-TRNG/TRAVL/DUES/UNIF 11,811 11,466 7,633 27,010 18,460 4,624 17,460 17,460 17,460 17,460 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 259,556 137,121 233,741 285,915 373,085 293,472 386,160 386,160 388,960 388,960 6310-RENTAL EXPENSE 8,914 8,764 8,768 9,300 9,000 3,653 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 6399-OTHER CHARGES 2,803 0 0 0 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES 11,717 8,764 8,768 9,300 9,000 3,653 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES 11,717 8,764 8,768 9,300 9,000 3,653 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 6725-CAPITAL OUTLAY-OFFICE EQUIP 146,596 66,656 89,236 184,000 246,000 147,866 187,800 187,800 209,400 209,400 6701-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 146,596 66,656 89,236 184,000 246,000 147,866 187,800 187,800 209,400 209,400 6700-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 146,596 66,656 89,236 184,000 246,000 147,866 187,800 187,800 209,400 209,400 951,036 824,315 971,048 1,122,545 1,290,824 755,760 1,270,045 1,265,900 1,313,300 1,313,300 54 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 05: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY-1030 COMPANY 1000: GENERAL FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND 6110 SALARIES Regular Employees 465,735 485,605 485,605 505,700 504,860 521,270 521,270 6113 Overtime-Reg 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 6123 Salaries-Other 18,955 18,385 18,385 15,805 16,380 15,580 15,580 6138 Medicare 7,085 7,365 7,365 7,620 7,615 7,840 7,840 6139 FICA 30,300 31,495 31,495 32,580 32,565 33,535 33,535 6141 Pension-PERA 36,650 38,100 38,100 39,415 39,390 40,560 40,560 6142 Work Comp Ins 3,110 3,260 3,260 3,540 3,725 4,030 4,030 6144 Long-term Disability Insurance 1,345 1,385 1,385 1,435 1,435 1,475 1,475 6145 Hospital&Life Insurance 82,850 80,844 80,844 84,890 80,870 85,550 85,550 6170 Employee Paid Premiums (6,700) (7,700) (7,700) (7,900) (7,900) (7,900) (7,900) Position Changes - - - - Total 643,330 662,739 662,739 687,085 682,940 705,940 705,940 6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES Miscellaneous Supplies 800 500 500 200 200 200 200 Total 800 500 500 200 200 200 200 6211 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIP. Miscellaneous Equipment 8,000 7,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 Total 8,000 7,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES Miscellaneous Technology Items - 500 500 500 500 500 500 Total - 500 500 500 500 500 500 6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES Miscellaneous - 8,000 2,500 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 LOGIS-Network Services 14,000 14,000 26,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 OPG-3 Concierge Care Package 6,400 6,400 - 6,400 6,400 6,400 6,400 Information Security Audit(vCISO) 3,000 30,000 3,500 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 Total 23,400 58,400 32,000 58,400 58,400 58,400 58,400 6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS Cellular Phones or Stipends 3,600 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 Mobile Wireless Data 500 960 960 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Primary Interface(Zayo/Frontier) 16,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 Total 20,100 16,960 16,960 17,000 17,000 17,000 17,000 6238 POSTAGE/UPS/FEDEX Shipping 200 200 100 200 200 200 200 Total 200 200 100 200 200 200 200 6240 CLEANING/GARBAGE SERVICES Electronics Recycling 600 600 6,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Total 600 600 6,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES Cisco Smartnet Maintenance 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 Microsoft Software Licensing 60,000 120,000 127,000 127,000 127,000 127,000 127,000 Laserfiche Annual Maintenance 24,000 24,000 26,000 27,000 27,000 28,000 28,000 GoToMeeting Annual Subscription 1,600 7,500 - - - - Web Filter(Umbrella)Maintenance 2,600 2,800 2,800 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 Veeam Maintenance(5yr begin 2019) 3,400 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 PDQ Annual Maintenance 4,500 4,500 4,500 7,800 7,800 7,800 7,800 AntiVirus(Amp and Trend)Maintenance 4,000 3,500 9,800 4,100 4,100 4,100 4,100 Vmware Maintenance(3yr begin 2022) - 5,000 11,000 - - - - Server Software Maint.(WebHelpDesk„Hyena) 2,000 1,000 1,300 1,400 1,400 1,500 1,500 Cabling Installation 2,500 2,000 2,500 2,500 3,000 3,000 Password Management Software 8,500 - 8,500 8,500 8,500 8,500 DBB Broadband 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 Hootsuite Annual Subscription 180 MailChimp Annual Subscription(PD only) 360 Wufoo Annual Subscription 400 Smartsheet Annual Subscription 1,600 1,600 1,400 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 OET VPN Annual Subscription 265 265 - - - - - Adobe Creative Cloud Subscription 600 1,200 - - - - - Adobe Software Maintenance Subscription 3,000 4,000 5,100 5,200 5,200 5,400 5,400 AMAG Software Maintenance(3yr 2022) 2,000 1,500 4,000 - - - - IP Phone System Annual Maintenance 17,500 17,500 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,500 18,500 KnowBe4 Security Training(via LOGIS) 2,400 2,400 2,400 2,600 2,600 2,800 2,800 Mobile Device Management Subscription 9,000 4,000 - - - - Web Hosting-CivicPlus 5,600 6,000 6,200 6,500 6,500 6,800 6,800 Agenda Management-NovusAGENDA 9,000 9,000 8,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 Total 191,605 256,265 285,400 269,200 269,200 272,000 272,000 6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT Multifunction Copier Service 12,000 12,000 11,400 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 HP Printer Managed Service 1,600 1,600 600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 Other Not Contracted 600 600 400 600 600 600 600 Total 14,200 14,200 12,400 14,200 14,200 14,200 14,200 6275 SCHOOL/CONF/EXP-LOCAL IT Technical Training 2,500 2,500 - 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 Gov't/IT Workshops 900 900 400 900 900 900 900 End User Training(Office,Windows) 3,000 600 3,000 600 600 600 600 Total 6,400 4,000 3,400 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 55 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 05: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY-1030 COMPANY 1000: GENERAL FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND 6276 SCHOOL/CONF/EXP-OTHER National Tech Conferences-Manager&Staff 12,000 6,000 5,300 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 Total 12,000 6,000 5,300 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 6277 MILEAGE ALLOWANCE IT Mgr Car Allowance($275 per month) 3,300 3,300 3,300 3,300 3,300 3,300 3,300 IT Staff Mileage Remibursement($20/each per mor 960 960 500 960 960 960 960 Total 4,260 4,260 3,800 4,260 4,260 4,260 4,260 6278 SUBSISTANCE ALLOWANCE 750 600 300 600 600 600 600 Total 750 600 300 600 600 600 600 6280 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS Computer Based Training Subscription 3,600 3,600 3,600 600 600 600 600 Total 3,600 3,600 3,600 600 600 600 600 6310 RENTAL EXPENSE Multifunction Copiers(Municipal Center) 9,300 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 Total 9,300 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 6725 CAPITAL OUTLAY-OFFICE EQUIP Desktops,Laptops,Mobile Device Replacements 56,000 50,000 60,000 87,900 87,900 87,900 87,900 Server Hardware Replacement 22,000 Cisco Networking Switch Replacements 90,000 90,000 92,000 35,400 35,400 35,400 35,400 Network Security/FirewalINPN 12,000 - 13,000 13,000 Backup Appliance 25,000 25,000 Public Safety Rugged Laptops 98,000 108,000 Cisco Wireless Access Points/Management 8,000 8,000 8,000 13,000 13,000 8,600 8,600 Conference Room Equipment 4,000 4,000 8,000 8,000 UPS Replacement 12,000 9,000 9,000 19,000 19,000 Enhanced Endpoint Security Licenses 6,000 Milestone Axis Camera Replacements 25,500 25,500 25,500 25,500 Total 184,000 246,000 290,000 187,800 187,800 209,400 209,400 Total Net Non-Personnel 479,215 628,085 677,260 582,960 582,960 607,360 607,360 TOTAL EXPENSES 1,122,545 1,290,824 1,339,999 1,270,045 1,265,900 1,313,300 1,313,300 56 ••• •••• ••••• ••• AppValley Notes: 57 COMPANY DEPARTMENT BUSINESS UNIT ACTIVITY 1000 16 1060 General Government Buildings DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY General Government Buildings reflects the expenses required to operate and maintain the Apple Valley Municipal Center, which includes both the City Hall portion and the Police Facility portion of the building. The City Hall portion provides Class A office space for Administration, City Council, City Clerk, Human Resources, Finance, Fire, Information Technology, Building Inspections, Community Development, Engineering, and Cable TV functions. It also serves as the main location for the City's public meetings including the City Council and Planning Commission. The Police Facility portion provides office space for the Patrol, Investigations, Records, and Administration functions. It contains secured spaces for the processing, temporary holding, and questioning of criminal suspects. MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2023 and 2024 The employees covered under this company provide the daily care and maintenance to the building and grounds. Contractual services are utilized for tasks that cannot be performed by the employees. 1. Additional part-time staff for maintenance practices and work assignments for improved efficiency and potential cost savings. 2. Develop duty rotation to provide optimum maintenance. IMPACT MEASURES / PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual Actual Actual Projected Projected Projected Item 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Number of Buildings 1 1 1 1 1 1 Number of Total Sq. Ft. 73,500 73,500 73,500 73,500 73,500 73,500 Number of Finished Sq. Ft. 66,239 66,239 73,500 73,500 73,500 73,500 Number of Restrooms 12 12 12 12 12 12 Number of Locker/Shower 4 4 4 4 4 4 Number of Snow/Ice Events 40 40 40 40 40 40 Regular Status Personnel Schedule-FTE's Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Proposed Position Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Maintenance Worker II 2 2 2 2 2 2 Temporary Status Personnel Schedule Adopted Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Position Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 P.T Maintenance .50 .50 58 Summary Budget Department 16 General Government Buildings 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Proposed Proposed Proposed Expenditures: Salaries&Wages 139,220 150,107 123,193 145,595 133,650 199,355 206,535 Employee Benefits 55,724 57,116 50,688 63,290 63,875 75,995 80,110 Supplies 17,998 18,444 20,200 14,400 14,400 15,650 16,150 Contractual Services 33,056 121,358 49,813 41,440 41,250 11,350 12,150 Utilities 78,619 75,368 93,109 71,500 77,900 89,500 89,800 Repairs&Maintenance 67,486 72,794 53,665 52,000 42,400 49,050 49,050 Training/Travel/Dues 752 1,726 801 750 750 750 750 Other Expenses 257 313 192 - - - - Items for Resale - - - - - - - Capital Outlay 2,620 2,620 7,031 2,620 2,620 2,690 3,690 Total Exp 395,732 499,845 398,692 391,595 376,845 444,340 458,235 Net Addition(use of)general revenues (395,732) (499,845) (398,692) (391,595) (376,845) (444,340) (458,235) 2023 CAPITAL OUTLAY VERF Charges for Pool Vehicle $ 2,620 2024 CAPITAL OUTLAY VERF Charges for Pool Vehicle $ 3,690 City of Apple Valley 59 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) GENERAL GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6110-SALARY-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 131,578 137,041 116,172 134,445 120,410 67,048 151,765 151,765 156,275 156,275 6111-SALARY PART-TIME 1,705 4,383 0 34,000 34,000 36,770 36,770 6112-SALARY-SEASONAL TEMP 1,618 3,170 1,100 6113-OVERTIME-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 11,875 14,410 6,629 7,200 7,200 7,006 7,200 7,200 7,200 7,200 6121-INSURANCE CASH BENEFIT 0 0 0 770 6122-COMP REQUEST -4,232 -4,667 -7,160 -5,379 6123-SALARY-OTHER 3,950 6,040 6,390 6,390 6,290 6,290 6105-SALARIES AND WAGES 139,220 150,107 123,193 145,595 133,650 70,545 199,355 199,355 206,535 206,535 6138-MEDICARE 1,909 2,035 1,643 2,110 1,940 969 2,890 2,890 2,995 2,995 6139-FICA 8,163 8,572 7,024 9,030 8,285 4,143 12,360 12,360 12,805 12,805 6141-PENSIONS-PERA 10,432 9,205 8,777 10,920 10,025 5,233 14,950 14,950 15,490 15,490 6142-WORKERS COMPENSATION 7,206 8,255 7,668 9,085 8,395 4,276 13,150 13,150 14,305 14,305 6144-LONG-TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE 260 269 191 400 350 95 430 430 440 440 6145-MEDICAL INSURANCE 30,850 34,483 32,271 32,245 35,880 14,952 33,215 33,215 35,075 35,075 6146-DENTAL INSURANCE 2,166 2,173 1,991 990 6147-LIFE INSURANCE-BASIC 12 12 11 19 6170-EMPLOYEE PAID PREMIUMS -5,274 -7,887 -8,889 -500 -1,000 -1,590 -1,000 -1,000 -1,000 -1,000 6125-EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 55,724 57,116 50,688 63,290 63,875 29,086 75,995 75,995 80,110 80,110 6100-TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 194,944 207,223 173,881 208,885 197,525 99,631 275,350 275,350 286,645 286,645 6210-OFFICE SUPPLIES 21 0 0 0 6211-SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT 809 457 2,646 750 750 753 750 750 750 750 6212-MOTOR FUELS/OILS 327 1,445 2,444 500 500 500 700 700 1,300 1,300 6215-EQUIPMENT-PARTS 501 144 5 300 300 19 300 300 200 200 6216-VEHICLES-TIRES/BATTERIES 0 555 463 0 6229-GENERAL SUPPLIES 16,340 15,843 14,642 12,850 12,850 11,528 13,900 13,900 13,900 13,900 6205-SUPPLIES 17,998 18,444 20,200 14,400 14,400 12,800 15,650 15,650 16,150 16,150 6235-CONSULTANT SERVICES 95 61 4,062 100 100 306 100 100 100 100 6237-TELEPHONE/PAGERS 2,080 8,834 2,143 2,100 2,100 1,121 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 6238-POSTAGE/UPS/FEDEX 56 0 0 0 6239-PRINTING 0 0 0 59 6240-CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE 23,032 36,808 38,161 29,540 29,600 14,037 6,600 6,600 7,400 7,400 6249-OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 7,793 75,655 5,447 9,700 9,450 5,996 2,450 2,450 2,450 2,450 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 33,056 121,358 49,813 41,440 41,250 21,519 11,350 11,350 12,150 12,150 6255-UTILITIES-ELECTRIC 48,946 50,749 59,173 49,000 54,800 21,442 56,500 56,500 56,500 56,500 6256-UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS 26,393 21,409 30,461 20,000 20,600 24,263 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 6257-UTILITIES-PROPANE/WATER/SEWER 3,279 3,209 3,474 2,500 2,500 537 3,000 3,000 3,300 3,300 6250-UTILITIES 78,619 75,368 93,109 71,500 77,900 46,242 89,500 89,500 89,800 89,800 6265-REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 1,224 2,663 10,132 1,500 1,500 867 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 6266-REPAIRS-BUILDING 66,262 70,131 43,533 50,500 40,900 30,453 46,550 46,550 46,550 46,550 6260-REPAIRS AND MAINTENA 67,486 72,794 53,665 52,000 42,400 31,320 49,050 49,050 49,050 49,050 6275-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL 0 0 0 61 6277-MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE 46 0 0 6280-DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 35 1,068 40 95 6281-UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 717 612 761 750 750 316 750 750 750 750 6270-TRNG/TRAVL/DUES/UNIF 752 1,726 801 750 750 473 750 750 750 750 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 197,911 289,690 217,588 180,090 176,700 112,354 166,300 166,300 167,900 167,900 6333-GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS -23 -33 -38 -60 6399-OTHER CHARGES 279 346 230 100 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES 257 313 192 40 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES 257 313 192 40 City of Apple Valley 60 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) GENERAL GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6545-NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE 0 0 0 0 0 0 6501-TAXABLE/NON-TAXABLE MISC RESAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 6500-TOTAL EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 0 0 6715-CAPITAL OUTLAY-BUILDINGS 0 0 1,911 0 0 0 6725-CAPITAL OUTLAY-OFFICE EQUIP 0 0 2,500 0 6740-CAPITAL OUTLAY-MACH/EQ/OTHER 0 0 0 0 6745-VERF CHARGES 2,620 2,620 2,620 2,620 2,620 1,092 2,690 2,690 3,690 3,690 6701-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 2,620 2,620 7,031 2,620 2,620 1,092 2,690 2,690 3,690 3,690 6700-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 2,620 2,620 7,031 2,620 2,620 1,092 2,690 2,690 3,690 3,690 395,732 499,845 398,692 391,595 376,845 213,116 444,340 444,340 458,235 458,235 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET 61 ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 16: GENERAL GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS-1060 COMPANY 1000: GENERAL FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND SALARIES 6110 Regular Employees 134,445 120,410 120,410 151,765 151,765 156,275 156,275 6111 PT Salaries 34,000 34,000 36,770 36,770 6113 Overtime-Reg 7,200 7,200 7,200 7,200 7,200 7,200 7,200 6123 Salaries-Other 3,950 6,040 6,040 6,390 6,390 6,290 6,290 6138 Medicare 2,110 1,940 1,940 2,890 2,890 2,995 2,995 6139 FICA 9,030 8,285 8,285 12,360 12,360 12,805 12,805 6141 Pension-PERA 10,920 10,025 10,025 14,950 14,950 15,490 15,490 6142 Work Comp Insurance 9,085 8,395 8,395 13,150 13,150 14,305 14,305 6144 Long-term Disability Insurance 400 350 350 430 430 440 440 6145 Hospital&Life Insurance 32,245 35,880 35,880 33,215 33,215 35,075 35,075 6170 Employee Paid Premiums (500) (1,000) (1,000) (1,000) (1,000) (1,000) (1,000) Position Changes - - Total 208,885 197,525 197,525 275,350 275,350 286,645 286,645 6211 SMALL TOOL&EQUIPMENT Miscellaneous 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 Total 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 6212 MOTOR FUELS/OILS City Hall Van 475 475 200 200 300 300 Emergency Generator 25 25 1,000 500 500 1,000 1,000 Total 500 500 1,000 700 700 1,300 1,300 6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS Miscellaneous 300 300 200 300 300 200 200 Total 300 300 200 300 300 200 200 6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES Cleaning supplies,hardware,bulbs, 12,850 12,850 16,400 13,900 13,900 13,900 13,900 filters,paper products,landscape items, ice melt,and coffee. Furniture-Miscellaneous - - I - - Total 12,850 12,850 16,400 13,900 13,900 13,900 13,900 6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES Drug&hearing testing,immunizations 100 100 140 100 100 100 100 Total 100 100 140 100 100 100 100 6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS Frontier Analog Lines 2,100 2,100 2,600 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 Total 2,100 2,100 2,600 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 6240 C.SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVAL Trash Removal 5,000 5,000 5,800 5,800 5,800 6,000 6,000 Rug Service 600 600 800 800 800 900 900 Shredding 500 500 Restroom Cleaning 23,940 24,000 7,980 - - - - Total 29,540 29,600 14,580 6,600 6,600 7,400 7,400 6249 Contract Services Fire Alarm Monitoring 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 Fire Alarm Testing 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 Lawn Maintenance and Mowing 7,000 7,000 8,500 - - - - Pest Control 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 Other 250 - - - - - - Total 9,700 9,450 10,950 2,450 2,450 2,450 2,450 6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC Municipal Center 49,000 54,800 53,300 56,500 56,500 56,500 56,500 Total 49,000 54,800 53,300 56,500 56,500 56,500 56,500 6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS Municipal Center 20,000 20,600 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 Total 20,000 20,600 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 6257 UTILITIES-OTHER Municipal Center 2,500 2,500 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,300 3,300 Total 2,500 2,500 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,300 3,300 6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT Security,generator,and other repair 1,500 1,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 Lektreiver Maintenance - - - - Total 1,500 1,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET 62 ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 16: GENERAL GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS-1060 COMPANY 1000: GENERAL FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND 6266 REPAIRS/MAINT-BUILDINGS HVAC Repairs&Routine Maintenance 30,000 20,000 25,000 25,000 20,000 20,000 Data/Security/Fire Suppression 2,150 2,150 3,000 3,000 8,000 8,000 Electrical 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 Elevator 8,400 8,800 8,600 8,600 8,600 8,600 General Interior(Storm Pipe,etc.) 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 General Exterior and Roof 1,500 1,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 Other(includes generator service etc.) 3,000 3,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Window Cleaning 700 700 45,670 700 700 700 700 Total 50,500 40,900 45,670 46,550 46,550 46,550 46,550 6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE Uniform Allowance 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 Total 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 6745 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND VERF 2,620 2,620 2,690 2,690 2,690 3,690 3,690 Total 2,620 2,620 2,690 2,690 2,690 3,690 3,690 Total Net of Personnel 182,710 179,320 184,530 168,990 168,990 171,590 171,590 TOTAL EXPENSES $ 391,595 $ 376,845 $ 382,055 $ 444,340 $ 444,340 $ 458,235 $ 458,235 63 COMPANY DEPARTMENT BUSINESS UNIT ACTIVITY 1000 08 1035 Finance DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY Finance is responsible for processing monetary transactions in accordance with Federal, State and local laws and in compliance with Generally Accepted Accounting Standards. Transactions include accounts payable, accounts receivable, investing, special assessments and financial reporting. The finance function also accounts for the unallocated costs of office supplies within City Hall, postage and the postage machine. MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2023/2024 • Generate financial policies and procedures and offer guidance to other departments • Maintain the City's Aaa Bond Rating • Implement new ERP Software for Finance, Budgeting and Utility Billing Functions • Expand efficiencies in the accounting and purchasing workflows • Improve the monthly interim reporting • Expand the participation in the customer portal for utility consumption and expand online payments • Continued monitoring and analysis of outstanding debt • Monitor TIF Fund status • Provide the financial support to evaluate funding needs and issue debt instruments as needed, including a series of bond to fund the Facilities Capital Improvement Plan • Participate in the GFOA's Certificate of Achievement program for the Annual Financial report and the Operating Budget IMPACT MEASURES / PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual Actual Actual Projected Projected Projected Item 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 AP Checks&ACH Payments 6400 6306 6,642 6600 6800 6800 Purchase Orders Issued 125 115 187 200 200 200 AIR Invoices Processed 417 337 222 250 250 250 Receipts Processed 1719 1567 1,839 2000 2000 2000 Investment Return 2.3% 3.82% -0.63% 0.0% 1.0% 1.5% Moody's Bond Rating Aaa Aaa Aaa Aaa Aaa Aaa S&P Rating AAA AAA AAA AAA AM AAA 64 Regular Status Personnel Schedule-FTE's Adopted Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Position Title 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Finance Director 1 1 1 1 1 1 Assistant Finance Director 1 1 1 1 1 1 Finance Analyst 1 1 1 1 1 1 Accountant I 1 1 1 1 1 1 Accounting Technician 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Summary Budget Department 08 Finance 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Proposed Proposed Proposed Revenue: 5397 Investment Mgmt Fee 124,000 125,000 127,500 127,500 131,000 135,000 139,000 5396 Charge Construction Funds - - - 69,200 69,200 69,200 69,200 124,000 125,000 127,500 196,700 200,200 204,200 208,200 Expenditures: Salaries&Wages 488,326 509,153 531,803 526,365 546,650 550,485 571,865 Employee Benefits 148,852 157,173 164,027 152,455 161,990 167,555 175,505 Supplies 7,743 8,232 4,890 7,750 9,500 9,200 10,300 Contractual Services 27,099 84,830 25,547 26,900 67,850 30,325 88,325 Repairs&Maint. - - 198 200 200 200 Training/Travel/Dues 763 - 3,615 8,635 8,535 8,345 8,440 Other Expenses 7,392 2,640 6,426 5,290 5,910 5,910 5,910 Capital Outlay 5,726 5,626 1,671 - - - - Total Expenses 685,901 767,654 738,177 727,395 800,635 772,020 860,545 Net addition to(use of)general (561,901) (642,654) (610,677) (530,695) (600,435) (567,820) (652,345) revenues CAPITAL OUTLAY 2023: None 2024: None City of Apple Valley 65 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) FINANCE 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6110-SALARY-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 487,225 509,978 530,663 507,900 526,585 262,272 531,170 531,170 552,955 552,955 6113-OVERTIME-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 0 417 30 500 2,500 139 5,000 500 5,000 500 6121-INSURANCE CASH BENEFIT 1,440 1,440 1,440 720 6122-COMP REQUEST -339 -2,682 -330 -139 6123-SALARY-OTHER 17,965 17,565 18,815 18,815 18,410 18,410 6105-SALARIES AND WAGES 488,326 509,153 531,803 526,365 546,650 262,992 554,985 550,485 576,365 571,865 6138-MEDICARE 6,536 6,782 7,145 7,635 7,925 3,034 8,050 8,050 8,355 8,355 6139-FICA 27,946 28,948 30,553 31,870 32,895 12,975 33,375 33,375 34,400 34,400 6141-PENSIONS-PERA 36,433 38,094 39,412 39,475 41,000 16,151 41,625 41,625 43,230 43,230 6142-WORKERS COMPENSATION 2,919 3,222 3,506 3,475 3,630 1,446 3,685 3,685 4,020 4,020 6144-LONG-TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE 978 1,025 883 1,450 1,495 323 1,510 1,510 1,570 1,570 6145-MEDICAL INSURANCE 84,943 94,057 93,816 82,850 80,845 34,118 85,210 85,210 89,830 89,830 6146-DENTAL INSURANCE 4,935 4,949 4,935 2,105 6147-LIFE INSURANCE-BASIC 30 30 33 42 6148-LIFE INSURANCE-SUPP/DEPEND 1,227 1,581 1,577 721 6170-EMPLOYEE PAID PREMIUMS -17,094 -21,516 -17,832 -14,300 -5,800 -3,986 -5,900 -5,900 -5,900 -5,900 6125-EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 148,852 157,173 164,027 152,455 161,990 66,928 167,555 167,555 175,505 175,505 6100-TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 637,178 666,326 695,830 678,820 708,640 329,920 722,540 718,040 751,870 747,370 6210-OFFICE SUPPLIES 5,961 7,719 3,945 7,700 9,400 4,318 9,100 9,100 10,200 10,200 6211-SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT 1,173 15 375 0 0 0 6215-EQUIPMENT-PARTS 0 498 0 50 50 0 50 50 50 50 6229-GENERAL SUPPLIES 610 0 571 0 50 199 50 50 50 50 6205-SUPPLIES 7,743 8,232 4,890 7,750 9,500 4,517 9,200 9,200 10,300 10,300 6238-POSTAGE/UPS/FEDEX 20,214 77,852 17,399 18,400 60,400 -2,869 22,425 22,425 80,425 80,425 6239-PRINTING 6,885 6,978 8,148 8,500 7,450 332 7,900 7,900 7,900 7,900 6240-CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE 0 0 0 0 0 0 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 27,099 84,830 25,547 26,900 67,850 -2,537 30,325 30,325 88,325 88,325 6265-REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 763 0 198 0 200 198 200 200 200 200 6260-REPAIRS AND MAINTENA 763 0 198 0 200 198 200 200 200 200 6275-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL 295 440 551 1,100 1,100 0 950 950 970 970 6276-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP OTHER 4,246 0 814 4,515 4,515 0 4,515 4,515 4,515 4,515 6277-MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE 191 0 3 200 200 0 200 200 200 200 6278-SUBSISTENCE ALLOWANCE 350 0 0 300 300 0 300 300 300 300 6280-DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 2,310 2,200 2,247 2,520 2,420 240 2,500 2,380 2,575 2,455 6270-TRNG/TRAVL/DUES/UNIF 7,392 2,640 3,615 8,635 8,535 240 8,465 8,345 8,560 8,440 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 42,996 95,702 34,250 43,285 86,085 2,418 48,190 48,070 107,385 107,265 6310-RENTAL EXPENSE 5,103 5,522 5,661 5,290 5,810 2,831 5,810 5,810 5,810 5,810 6321-CASH OVER/SHORT 20 0 0 0 6333-GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS 0 2 0 0 6349-LATE FEES/FINANCE CHARGES 15 0 0 0 6350-BANK FEES/CHARGES 588 101 764 0 100 -1,160 100 100 100 100 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES 5,726 5,626 6,426 5,290 5,910 1,671 5,910 5,910 5,910 5,910 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES 5,726 5,626 6,426 5,290 5,910 1,671 5,910 5,910 5,910 5,910 6401-EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 6400-TOTAL EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 6725-CAPITAL OUTLAY-OFFICE EQUIP 0 0 1,671 0 0 5,448 6701-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 0 0 1,671 0 0 5,448 6700-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 0 0 1,671 0 0 5,448 685,901 767,654 738,176 727,395 800,635 339,456 776,640 772,020 865,165 860,545 66 CITY OF APPLE V CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DET, ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 08: FINANCE-1035 COMPANY 1000: GENERAL FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED REQUEST RECOMMEND REQUEST RECOMMEND REVENUE 5396 Admin Fee-Construction 69,200 69,200 - 69,200 69,200 69,200 69,200 5397 Admin Fee-Investment Management 127,500 131,000 131,000 135,000 135,000 139,000 139,000 Total 196,700 200,200 131,000 204,200 204,200 208,200 208,200 SALARIES 6110 Regular Employees 507,900 526,585 475,000 531,170 531,170 552,955 552,955 6113 Overtime-Regular 500 2,500 2,500 5,000 500 5,000 500 6110.1 Salaries-Other 17,965 17,565 16,000 18,815 18,815 18,410 18,410 6138 Medicare 7,635 7,925 7,200 8,050 8,050 8,355 8,355 6139 FICA 31,870 32,895 29,600 33,375 33,375 34,400 34,400 6141 Pension-PERA 39,475 41,000 37,000 41,625 41,625 43,230 43,230 6142 Work Comp Insurance 3,475 3,630 3,300 3,685 3,685 4,020 4,020 6144 Long-term Disability Insurance 1,450 1,495 1,350 1,510 1,510 1,570 1,570 6145 Hospital&Life Insurance 82,850 80,845 72,000 85,210 85,210 89,830 89,830 6170 Employee Paid Premiums (14,300) (5,800) (5,800) (5,900) (5,900) (5,900) (5,900) Total 678,820 708,640 638,150 722,540 718,040 751,870 747,370 6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES General Office Supplies 2,600 1,700 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Copier Paper 4,000 6,000 6,000 5,000 5,000 6,000 6,000 Postage Machine Supplies 100 700 150 100 100 200 200 Bank Deposit Bags 1,000 1,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Total 7,700 9,400 10,150 9,100 9,100 10,200 10,200 6215 Equipment-Parts Phone Equipment/Batteries 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Total 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES Miscellaneous - 50 250 50 50 50 50 Total - 50 250 50 50 50 50 6238 POSTAGE/UPS/FEDEX Postal Permits 250 250 250 275 275 275 275 Postage 18,000 60,000 60,000 22,000 22,000 80,000 80,000 Miscellaneous Postal Charges 150 150 50 150 150 150 150 Total 18,400 60,400 60,300 22,425 22,425 80,425 80,425 6239 PRINTING/PUBLISHING Envelopes and Letterhead 2,000 1,000 1,205 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 Receipts,Checks,Requisitions,P.O.'s,E 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 Printing;Inserts,etc. 800 850 900 900 900 900 900 County Charge for T in T notices 3,700 3,600 3,600 3,600 3,600 3,600 3,600 Publish Budget,Finance Report 1,500 1,500 1,750 1,700 1,700 1,700 1,700 Total 8,500 7,450 7,955 7,900 7,900 7,900 7,900 6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT Folder Machine-Annual Maintenance 200 198 200 200 200 200 Other Repairs - - - - Total - I 200 198 200 200 200 200 6275 SCHOOL/CONF/EXP-LOCAL Municipals 250 250 100 200 200 210 210 Mileage to Local Training 250 250 25 200 200 210 210 Chamber Meetings - - 15 - - - - Webinars 150 150 200 200 200 200 200 Other 50 50 300 50 50 50 50 State GFOA Monthly Meetings 400 400 100 300 300 300 300 Total 1,100 1,100 740 950 950 970 970 6276 SCHOOL/CONF/EXP-OTHER LMC 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Other Training 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 GFOA Conference 2,565 2,565 - 2,565 2,565 2,565 2,565 MN GFOA Conference 1,550 1,550 1,550 1,550 1,550 1,550 1,550 Total 4,515 4,515 1,950 4,515 4,515 4,515 4,515 6277 MILEAGE ALLOWANCE Miscellaneous 200 200 20 200 200 200 200 Total 200 200 20 200 200 200 200 6278 SUBSISTENCE National GFOA 300 300 - 300 300 300 300 Total 300 300 - 300 300 300 300 6280 Dues and Subscriptions National GFOA 600 600 600 625 625 625 625 GFOA-CAFR&PAFR review 750 750 900 900 900 950 950 GFOA Subscription service(GASB Revie 70 70 - - - - - State GFOA 180 180 210 210 210 225 225 Notary 120 120 - 120 - 120 - MnCPA-Dues 300 300 325 330 330 330 330 MN CPA License 200 200 115 115 115 125 125 Sam's Club 300 200 150 200 200 200 200 Total 2,520 2,420 2,300 2,500 2,380 2,575 2,455 67 CITY OF APPLE V CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 08: FINANCE-1035 COMPANY 1000: GENERAL FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED REQUEST RECOMMEND REQUEST RECOMMEND 6310 Rental Expense Postage Meter Maintenance 150 150 150 150 150 150 Postage Meter Lease 5,140 5,660 5,660 5,660 5,660 5,660 5,660 Total 5,290 5,810 5,660 5,810 5,810 5,810 5,810 6350 Bank Charges Cashier Checks for PD 100 400 100 100 100 100 Total - 100 400 100 100 100 100 6720 CAPITAL OUTLAY-OFFICE FURN Office chairs 800 Total - - 6725 CAPITAL OUTLAY-OFFICE EQUIP Adjustable Height Workstations(2) - - 5,000 - - - - Total - - 5,000 - - - - Total Net of Personnel 48,575 91,995 94,973 54,100 53,980 113,295 113,175 TOTAL EXPENSES $ 727,395 $ 800,635 $ 733,123 $ 776,640 $ 772,020 $ 865,165 $ 860,545 68 ••• •••• ••••• ••• AppValley Notes: 69 COMPANY DEPARTMENT BUSINESS UNIT ACTIVITY 1000 09 1040 Data Processing DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY This business unit accounts for the unallocated costs associated with the LOGIS consortium and the JD Edwards finance software in use. Portions of the cost are allocated to the enterprise funds based on numbers of system users. MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2023/24 - • The budget increases for 2023 reflect an average increase of 5.7%. • Over the next 2-3 years Apple Valley will be participating in the ERP software implementation program, led by the LOGIS consortium. The ERP implementation will include Finance & Accounting, Human Resources, Payroll, and Utility Billing software. IMPACT MEASURES / PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual Actual Adopted Actual Projected Projected Item 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Number of JD Edwards 11 11 11 11 11 11 Licenses I Users Insight GL Inquiry Licenses 10 10 10 10 10 10 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Proposed Proposed Proposed Expenditures: Contractual Services - - - - - -Other Expenses 253,773 263,097 265,311 259,178 278,755 294,735 312,575 Capital Outlay - - - - -Net addition to(use of) 253,773 263,097 265,311 259,178 278,755 294,735 312,575 general revenues 2023 / 2024 CAPITAL OUTLAY: None City of Apple Valley 70 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) DATA PROCESSING 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0 0 0 0 6270-TRNG/TRAVL/DUES/UNIF 0 0 0 0 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 0 0 0 0 6399-OTHER CHARGES 253,773 263,097 265,311 259,178 278,755 151,129 294,735 294,735 312,575 312,575 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES 253,773 263,097 265,311 259,178 278,755 151,129 294,735 294,735 312,575 312,575 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES 253,773 263,097 265,311 259,178 278,755 151,129 294,735 294,735 312,575 312,575 253,773 263,097 265,311 259,178 278,755 151,129 294,735 294,735 312,575 312,575 71 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 09: DATA PROCESSING-1040 COMPANY 1000: GENERAL FUND 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROPOSED RECOMMEND PROPOSED RECOMMEND 6399 OTHER CHARGES AP Automation(Scanners&Maintenance) 375 375 375 375 375 375 375 JDE Budgeting Module(these amount not allocated yet-General Fund is 50%) - - - - - - - Financial,Debt Book 59,730 62,055 62,055 71,110 71,110 74,700 74,700 AP AUTOMATION-Docusphere 13,830 14,520 14,520 15,245 15,245 16,000 16,000 HR/Payroll/ESS 69,755 72,370 72,370 75,265 75,265 79,000 79,000 Utility Billing 107,730 111,770 111,770 116,240 116,240 122,100 122,100 Police Mobiles 43,450 45,190 45,190 47,360 47,360 49,700 49,700 Fire Mobiles 5,495 5,715 5,715 6,185 6,185 6,500 6,500 Police Records 121,315 125,865 125,865 130,900 130,900 137,400 137,400 Permits&Inspections 37,135 38,530 38,530 40,070 40,070 42,100 42,100 e-Permits 5,280 5,500 5,500 5,780 5,780 6,100 6,100 Managed Services-Hosted Servers(Bldg lnsp) 7,250 7,480 7,480 7,790 7,790 8,200 8,200 Internet 23,015 23,705 23,705 24,890 24,890 26,100 26,100 System Development-UB 6,400 6,400 6,400 6,450 6,450 6,800 6,800 System Development-Building Inspections 3,025 2,125 2,125 2,175 2,175 2,300 2,300 System Development-Other 19,490 20,855 20,855 22,700 22,700 23,800 23,800 Water Sewer (197,200) (200,000) (200,000) (211,000) (211,000) (218,800) (218,800) Liquor (13,400) (13,400) (13,400) (14,200) (14,200) (15,000) (15,000) Ice Arena (5,447) (5,800) (5,800) (6,400) (6,400) (6,800) (6,800) Direct Bill to Building Inspections (52,550) (55,300) (55,300) (57,400) (57,400) (59,400) (59,400) Additional Services by Hour 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 Facility Condition Inventory-Asset Planner License - 6,000 6,000 6,300 6,300 6,300 6,300 State of MN WAN Access 4,100 4,400 4,400 4,500 4,500 4,700 4,700 Total 259,178 278,755 278,755 294,735 294,735 312,575 312,575 Total Net of Personnel 259,178 278,755 278,755 294,735 294,735 312,575 312,575 TOTAL EXPENSES $ 259,178 $ 278,755 $ 278,755 $ 294,735 $ 294,735 $ 312,575 $ 312,575 72 ••• •••• ••••• ••• AppValley Notes: 73 COMPANY DEPARTMENT BUSINESS UNIT ACTIVITY 1000 10 1045 Independent Audit DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY This business unit accounts for the General Fund's share of the annual audit cost. Portions of the audit costs are also allocated to the enterprise funds. The City currently contracts with Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich and Company P.A. (MMKR) from Minneapolis for the annual audit. In 2020, a 3 year engagement was entered into for the audit of the 2020 to 2022 financial statements, with work to be completed in 2021- 2023. MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2023/24 With the receipt of Federal Funds in 2021 and 2022,with the expenditures over the coming years a Federal Single Audit will be required for each of the year's expenditures exceed $750,000. Continue to work with the current auditor and maintain compliance with Minnesota Statutes as related to the financial system processes and monitor internal controls at various locations. IMPACT MEASURES / PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual Actual Actual Projected Projected Projected Item 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Unqualified Opinion Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Received Single Audit Required on No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Federal Receipts Summary Budget Department 10-Audit 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Proposed Proposed Proposed Expenditures: Contractual Services 12,685 12,085 18,361 17,195 16,800 17,200 17,500 Total Exp 12,685 12,085 18,361 17,195 16,800 17,200 17,500 Net addition to(use of) 12,685 12,085 18,361 17,195 16,800 17,200 17,500 general revenues 2022 /2023 CAPITAL OUTLAY: None City of Apple Valley 74 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) INDEPENDENT AUDIT 2021 Council 2022 Council Object Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6235-CONSULTANT SERVICES 12,685 12,085 18,361 17,195 16,800 7,503 17,200 17,200 17,500 17,500 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 12,685 12,085 18,361 17,195 16,800 7,503 17,200 17,200 17,500 17,500 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 12,685 12,085 18,361 17,195 16,800 7,503 17,200 17,200 17,500 17,500 12,685 12,085 18,361 17,195 16,800 7,503 17,200 17,200 17,500 17,500 75 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 10: INDEPENDENT AUDIT-1045 COMPANY 1000: GENERAL FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND 6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES Audit Fee 17,195 13,300 13,300 13,700 13,700 14,000 14,000 Single Audit - 3,500 - 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 Total 17,195 16,800 13,300 17,200 17,200 17,500 17,500 Total Net of Personnel 17,195 16,800 13,300 17,200 17,200 17,500 17,500 TOTAL EXPENSES $ 17,195 $ 16,800 $ 13,300 $ 17,200 $ 17,200 $ 17,500 $ 17,500 76 ••• •••• ••••• ••• AppValley Notes: 77 COMPANY DEPARTMENT BUSINESS UNIT ACTIVITY 1000 14 1050 & 1055 Legal Services DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY Legal covers the City's activities related to civil matters and criminal prosecution. The City utilizes the services of a private law firm for these services. The firm provides a retainer fee for both basic civil work and criminal prosecution. Hourly rates are charged to defend against lawsuits, to prepare special projects where it is appropriate for the project to potentially pay for the legal expense, and to appeal criminal cases. Additional reimbursable expenses are also charged against this account. MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2023 Provide high quality civil legal counsel and criminal prosecution services. IMPACT MEASURES / PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual Actual Actual Projected Projected Projected Item 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Number of criminal cases reviewed 349 216 293 278 380 380 Number of formal complaints issued 272 127 196 146 310 310 Number of cases opened 1,084 660 1,074 2,900 2,500 2,500 Key: • Number of criminal cases reviewed means the number of cases the City forwarded to the City Attorney for review for formal charging. • Number of formal complaint issued means the number of cases reviewed that resulted in a formal complaint charge. • Number of cases opened means a file was opened for any misdemeanor and gross misdemeanor offense. The City Attorney also opens files for petty misdemeanors with court trials. • In 2016, cases reviewed and the number of formal complaints decreased due to officers being able to issue more citations for the violations without our involvement. This is often the result of the nature of the offense, combined with fewer demands by defendants for formal complaints. Though there may be less involvement by our attorneys at an earlier stage in prosecuting, the total number of incidents being added to the court docket and being prosecuted increased. 78 Summary Budget Department 14 Legal Services 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Proposed Proposed Proposed Revenue: 4270 Court Fines 308,260 169,426 179,585 295,400 300,000 300,000 300,000 308,260 169,426 179,585 295,400 300,000 300,000 300,000 Expenditures: Contractual Services 545,824 547,589 583,041 553,000 579,344 595,950 613,310 Total Exp 545,824 547,589 583,041 553,000 579,344 595,950 613,310 Net provision to(use of) (237,564) (378,163) (403,456) (257,600) (279,344) (295,950) (313,310) general revenues 2023 CAPITAL OUTLAY: None 2024 CAPITAL OUTLAY: None City of Apple Valley 79 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) LEGAL SERVICES 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6105-SALARIES AND WAGES 0 0 0 0 6125-EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 0 0 0 0 6100-TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 0 0 0 0 6231 -LEGAL SERVICES 545,824 547,589 583,041 553,000 579,344 330,139 595,950 595,950 613,310 613,310 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 545,824 547,589 583,041 553,000 579,344 330,139 595,950 595,950 613,310 613,310 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 545,824 547,589 583,041 553,000 579,344 330,139 595,950 595,950 613,310 613,310 545,824 547,589 583,041 553,000 579,344 330,139 595,950 595,950 613,310 613,310 80 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 14: LEGAL SERVICES-1050/1055 COMPANY 1000: GENERAL FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED REQUEST RECOMMEND REQUEST RECOMMEND 4270 Court Fines 295,400 300,000 300000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 Total 295,400 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 6231 CONSULTANT SERVICES General Legal Retainer 177,600 188,416 188,412 194,070 194,070 199,890 199,890 Police Legal Retainer 350,250 365,028 365,275 375,980 375,980 387,520 387,520 General Legal-Nonretainer 20,000 20,600 20,000 20,600 20,600 20,600 20,600 Police Legal-Nonretainer 5,150 5,300 7,500 5,300 5,300 5,300 5,300 Total 553,000 579,344 581,187 595,950 595,950 613,310 613,310 Total Net of Personnel 553,000 579,344 581,187 595,950 595,950 613,310 613,310 TOTAL EXPENSES $ 553,000 $ 579,344 $ 581,187 $ 595,950 $ 595,950 $ 613,310 $ 613,310 81 COMPANY DEPARTMENT BUSINESS UNIT ACTIVITY 1000 15 1100 Community Development DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY The Community Development Department is responsible for near and long term community and project based planning, the planning and zoning review process, code compliance, and economic development. The department promotes, evaluates and monitors commercial development and redevelopment, primarily in the established downtown; industrial development in areas of the City guided by the Comprehensive Plan for job creation; housing development with a range of densities when zoned for those uses; and the evaluation of new approaches to development: mixed use and/or transit oriented development that creates value in live,work, shop and recreational environments. MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2023 and 2024 • Facilitate planning and development in established and emerging industrial, commercial, mixed use, transit oriented and neighborhood areas. • Advance development at Orchard Place; formerly the active mining area. • Facilitate Economic Development Authority (EDA) opportunities to support development; consideration of job development tax increment tools, public/private partnerships, and business assistance as funds are available. • Facilitate programs with homeowners and local lender resources that enhances homes and neighborhood livability. • Foster positive business relationships, outreach, and collaboration. • Encourage downtown development and redevelopment; a priority area is the northwest quadrant of CR42 and Cedar Avenue. • Recommend and implement communication strategies that emphasize the Apple Valley brand and attract national and global business development interests. • Review and process subdivision, land use, conditional use, and ordinance applications and modifications and facilitate development opportunities. • Issue economic development updates weekly. • Pursue federal, state, and regional resources and state legislative initiatives to support objectives. IMPACT MEASURES / PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual Actual Actual Projected Projected Projected Item 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Land Use Actions 54 39 55 55 55 55 Comm/Industrial Permits 96 76 105 100 100 100 Value of Comm/Industrial $43 mill $13 mill $37 mill $35 mill $35 mill $35 mill Residential Permits 48 10 65 50 50 50 Value of Residential $13 mill $1.4 mill $14 mill $35 mill $35 mill $35 mill Closed Sales-Residential 996 982 1,015 1,000 1,000 1,000 82 Regular Status Personnel Schedule-FTE's Adopted Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Position Title 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Community Development Dir. 1 1 1 1 1 1 City Planner 1 1 1 1 1 1 Planner 2 2 2 2 2 2 Department Assistant 1 1 1 1 1 1 Summary Budget Department 15 Community Development 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Proposed Proposed Proposed Revenue: 4066-PERMIT-SIGNS 10,048 12,759 13,572 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 4214 FEES-PLAT 3,359 10,367 6,067 8,400 8,400 8,400 8,400 4215 FEES-SPECIAL USE 325 40 829 2,430 2,430 2,430 2,430 4216 FEES-REZONING 7,410 4,680 5,723 8,400 8,400 8,400 8,400 21,142 27,846 26,191 39,230 39,230 39,230 39,230 Expenditures: Salaries&Wages 507,559 529,559 591,086 543,040 562,020 574,770 597,750 Employee Benefits 140,917 126,165 144,711 152,065 150,200 156,995 165,110 Supplies 9,844 875 508 900 700 700 700 Contractual Services 36,661 29,036 28,938 25,800 20,400 20,100 21,440 Training/Travel/Dues 13,521 10,104 12,148 16,550 15,550 16,150 16,150 Other Expenses 550 550 213 600 600 600 600 Capital Outlay - - - - - - Total Exp 709,051 696,289 777,604 738,955 749,470 769,315 801,750 Net addition to(use of) (687,909) (668,443) (751,413) (699,725) (710,240) (730,085) (762,520) general revenues 2023 CAPITAL OUTLAY None 2024 CAPITAL OUTLAY None City of Apple Valley 83 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6110-SALARY-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 502,778 462,727 524,747 523,020 540,215 254,889 561,030 554,030 579,885 576,385 6113-OVERTIME-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 4,061 860 1,543 3,000 3,000 1,257 3,000 2,000 3,000 2,000 6119-ANNUAL LEAVE 1,000 6120-EMPLOYMENT AGENCIES 0 65,253 63,416 16,658 6121-INSURANCE CASH BENEFIT 720 720 1,380 720 6122-COMP REQUEST 0 0 0 -562 6123-SALARY-OTHER 17,020 18,805 18,740 18,740 19,365 19,365 6105-SALARIES AND WAGES 507,559 529,559 591,086 543,040 562,020 273,962 582,770 574,770 602,250 597,750 6138-MEDICARE 7,157 6,477 7,357 8,050 8,150 3,603 8,450 8,335 8,730 8,670 6139-FICA 29,888 27,069 30,923 33,165 33,850 15,406 35,100 35,035 36,005 35,940 6141-PENSIONS-PERA 37,856 34,554 38,991 41,630 42,150 19,244 43,710 43,110 45,170 44,830 6142-WORKERS COMPENSATION 3,050 2,908 3,496 3,500 3,730 1,729 3,870 3,815 4,200 4,165 6144-LONG-TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE 1,015 945 890 1,525 1,535 381 1,595 1,575 1,650 1,640 6145-MEDICAL INSURANCE 69,869 67,472 77,356 73,895 71,985 33,465 76,525 76,525 81,265 81,265 6146-DENTAL INSURANCE 3,972 3,510 3,920 1,815 6147-LIFE INSURANCE-BASIC 30 25 33 47 6148-LIFE INSURANCE-SUPP/DEPEND 181 196 296 140 6170-EMPLOYEE PAID PREMIUMS -12,100 -16,992 -18,550 -9,700 -11,200 -3,060 -11,400 -11,400 -11,400 -11,400 6125-EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 140,917 126,165 144,711 152,065 150,200 72,770 157,850 156,995 165,620 165,110 6100-TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 648,476 655,724 735,797 695,105 712,220 346,731 740,620 731,765 767,870 762,860 6210-OFFICE SUPPLIES 97 396 229 500 300 92 300 300 300 300 6211-SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 232 6229-GENERAL SUPPLIES 9,746 479 279 400 400 0 400 400 400 400 6205-SUPPLIES 9,844 875 508 900 700 324 700 700 700 700 6235-CONSULTANT SERVICES 23,002 3,654 3,119 7,500 7,500 3,369 8,100 7,400 8,100 8,740 6238-POSTAGE/UPS/FEDEX 0 381 0 0 6239-PRINTING 7,751 2,565 457 2,200 2,200 634 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 6240-CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE 203 229 254 166 6249-OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,704 22,206 25,107 16,100 10,700 3,980 10,500 10,500 10,500 10,500 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 36,661 29,036 28,938 25,800 20,400 8,148 20,800 20,100 20,800 21,440 6250-UTILITIES 6265-REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 6260-REPAIRS AND MAINTENA 0 0 0 0 0 0 6275-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL 3,594 1,904 4,189 3,800 3,800 1,866 3,900 3,900 3,900 3,900 6276-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP OTHER 764 125 0 2,500 1,500 345 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 6277-MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE 4,065 3,300 3,300 4,300 4,300 1,650 4,300 4,300 4,300 4,300 6278-SUBSISTENCE ALLOWANCE 100 0 0 750 750 0 750 750 750 750 6280-DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 4,997 4,775 4,659 5,200 5,200 1,975 5,200 5,200 5,200 5,200 6270-TRNG/TRAVL/DUES/UNIF 13,521 10,104 12,148 16,550 15,550 5,835 16,150 16,150 16,150 16,150 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 60,025 40,015 41,594 43,250 36,650 14,308 37,650 36,950 37,650 38,290 6310-RENTAL EXPENSE 550 550 213 600 600 1,100 600 600 600 600 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES 550 550 213 600 600 1,100 600 600 600 600 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES 550 550 213 600 600 1,100 600 600 600 600 6701-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 0 0 0 0 6700-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 0 0 0 0 709,051 696,289 777,604 738,955 749,470 362,139 778,870 769,315 806,120 801,750 84 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 15: COMM DEVELOPMENT-1100 COMPANY 1000: GENERAL FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND REVENUE 4066 Permits-Signs&Billboards 20,000 20,000 15,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 4214 Fees-Plat 8,400 8,400 8,400 8,400 8,400 8,400 8,400 4215 Fees-Special Use 2,430 2,430 2,430 2,430 2,430 2,430 2,430 4216 Fees-Rezoning 8,400 8,400 8,400 8,400 8,400 8,400 8,400 Total 39,230 39,230 34,230 39,230 39,230 39,230 39,230 SALARIES 6110 Regular Employees 523,020 540,215 533,215 561,030 554,030 579,885 576,385 6113 Salaries-Overtime 3,000 3,000 2,000 3,000 2,000 3,000 2,000 6110.1 Salaries-Other 17,020 18,805 18,805 18,740 18,740 19,365 19,365 6138 Medicare 8,050 8,150 8,035 8,450 8,335 8,730 8,670 6139 FICA 33,165 33,850 33,785 35,100 35,035 36,005 35,940 6141 Pension-PERA 41,630 42,150 41,550 43,710 43,110 45,170 44,830 6142 Work Comp Insurance 3,500 3,730 3,675 3,870 3,815 4,200 4,165 6144 Long-term Disability Insurance 1,525 1,535 1,515 1,595 1,575 1,650 1,640 6145 Hospital&Life Insurance 73,895 71,985 71,985 76,525 76,525 81,265 81,265 6170 Employee Paid Premiums (9,700) (11,200) (11,200) (11,400) (11,400) (11,400) (11,400) Total 695,105 712,220 703,365 740,620 731,765 767,870 762,860 6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES Project Folders 500 300 300 300 300 300 300 Total 500 300 300 300 300 300 300 6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES Drafting Supplies 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 Total 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES Co-Star Mkt Access 2,500 2,500 3,100 3,100 3,400 3,100 4,740 Special Studies 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 4,000 5,000 4,000 Total 7,500 7,500 8,100 8,100 7,400 8,100 8,740 6239 PRINTING/PUBLISHING Promotion Printing 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Business Cards 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 Total 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES City Promotions-Chamber 5,200 5,200 5,200 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 Economic Development 7,000 5,500 5,500 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 GoToMeeting 400 - - - - - - Pictometry 2,000 - - - - - - ArcView Maintenance Contract 1,500 - - - - - - Total 16,100 10,700 10,700 10,500 10,500 10,500 10,500 6275 SCHOOL/CONF/EXP-LOCAL Planning Staff State Conf/Seminars 1,900 1,900 1,900 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Planning Commission State Conference 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 Rotary Meetings 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 SLUC/EDAM/ULI/Chamber 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 Total 3,800 3,800 3,800 3,900 3,900 3,900 3,900 6276 SCHOOL/CONF/EXP-OTHER APA/ULI/IEDC Conference 1,500 1,500 1,500 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 NDC-Week/Local 1,000 - - - - - - Total 2,500 1,500 1,500 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 6277 MILEAGE ALLOWANCE Mileage Allowance 3,300 3,300 3,300 3,300 3,300 3,300 3,300 Mileage Reimbursement 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Total 4,300 4,300 4,300 4,300 4,300 4,300 4,300 6278 SUBSISTANCE ALLOWANCE 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 Total 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 6280 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS APA Dues 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 PAS 850 850 850 850 850 850 850 Other(EDAM,ULI,SLUC,IEDC,Rotary) 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 Total 5,200 5,200 5,200 5,200 5,200 5,200 5,200 6310 RENTAL EXPENSE Chamber Rental-Expo 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 Total 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 Total Net of Personnel 43,850 37,250 37,850 38,250 37,550 38,250 38,890 TOTAL EXPENSES $ 738,955 $ 749,470 $ 741,215 $ 778,870 $ 769,315 $ 806,120 $ 801,750 85 COMPANY DEPARTMENT BUSINESS UNIT ACTIVITY 1000 06 1013 Code Enforcement DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY Apple Valley has aging commercial and housing property and considerable investment underway. The developed commercial and residential property requires monitoring and ordinance compliance to ensure continued proper maintenance. Code Enforcement is responsible for general property maintenance concerns, notices of violation to property owners, compliance follow-up, abatement of nuisance conditions, and court assisted compliance when needed. Monitoring of waste hauling, outside parking and vehicle storage, and abatement of general nuisance conditions, such as yard storage, noise complaints and noxious weeds are common activities. Complaints and the need for follow- up actions remain in high volume and complexity. A case work approach with property owners and complainants includes legal counsel guidance. The maintenance of the housing stock requires vigilance with a concern about deferred maintenance and in some instances hoarding. The number of vacant,foreclosed, or poorly maintained housing has declined. Generally, average property values are up 12 percent year over year. The budget provides resources to proactively promote housing maintenance and emphasize quality neighborhoods. MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2023 and 2024 • Respond to complaints; investigate and pursue compliance. • With repeat offenders, facilitate compliance with further legal action, if necessary. • Enforce the housing and commercial property maintenance code using case work strategies that encourage collaborative property owner compliance. • Educate residents to secure voluntary compliance in ordinance requirements: tall grass and weeds, watering restrictions, waste hauling, outside parking and storage of vehicles; outside storage of materials and removal of refuse, exterior and interior maintenance of buildings. • Aggressively enforce sign ordinance requirements by removing signs in right of way. Manage commercial building sign permits in a timely manner. • Proactively enforce property maintenance as time permits in broader neighborhoods. • Facilitate expanding, improving and repairing of single family homes. IMPACT MEASURES / PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual Actual Actual Projected Projected Projected Item 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Inspections 4,510 4,576 4,683 5,000 5,000 5,000 Garbage Can/Trash 1,081 1,167 853 1,000 1,000 1,000 Grass/Weeds/Snow 358 257 253 300 300 300 Residential Alt/Addition/Repair/Roof/ 2,053 1,958 2,295 2,000 2,000 2,000 CDA Home Improvement Loans 6 6 7 6 6 6 Dart's Senior Maintenance Assistant 32 24 25 30 30 30 86 Regular Status Personnel Schedule -FTE's Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Proposed Position Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Code Compliance 1 1 1 1 1 1 Specialist Code Compliance 1 1 1 1 1 1 Technician Code(seasonal) Admin Specialist *1 1 1 1 1 1 *2019-9 Months Summary Budget Department 06 Code Enforcement 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Revenue 4145 Other Federal Grant-DART - - - - 26,000 26,000 26,000 4218 Fines-Weed Mowing 1,650 1,300 1,300 2,100 2,100 2,100 2,100 1,650 1,300 1,300 2,100 28,100 28,100 28,100 Expenditures Salaries&Wages 161,083 192,464 192,464 229,420 231,770 239,815 252,035 Employee Benefits 54,110 63,483 63,483 81,870 80,885 85,525 90,445 Supplies 1,500 1,968 1,968 2,400 1,850 2,100 2,100 Contractual Services 4,591 1,439 1,439 3,680 28,600 28,600 28,600 Repairs&Maintenance - - - 200 200 200 200 Training/Travel/Dues 605 463 463 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 Capital Outlay 2,540 2,540 2,540 2,540 2,540 5,890 6,070 Total Exp 224,429 262,356 262,356 321,210 346,945 363,230 380,550 Net addition to(use of)general (222,779) (261,056) (261,056) (319,110) (344,845) (361,130) (378,450) revenues 2023 CAPITAL OUTLAY None 2024 CAPITAL OUTLAY: None City of Apple Valley 87 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) CODE ENFORCEMENT 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6110-SALARY-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 159,847 191,024 159,525 219,765 220,460 74,979 229,195 229,195 241,550 241,550 6111-SALARY PART-TIME 0 0 6113-OVERTIME-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 642 122 842 2,500 2,500 1,307 2,500 1,500 2,500 1,500 6119-ANNUAL LEAVE 1,306 6121-INSURANCE CASH BENEFIT 840 1,440 1,440 720 6122-COMP REQUEST -246 -122 -590 -695 6123-SALARY-OTHER 7,155 8,810 9,120 9,120 8,985 8,985 6105-SALARIES AND WAGES 161,083 192,464 161,217 229,420 231,770 77,616 240,815 239,815 253,035 252,035 6138-MEDICARE 2,280 2,753 2,339 3,325 3,360 1,127 3,490 3,490 3,670 3,670 6139-FICA 9,748 11,629 10,001 14,225 14,370 4,818 14,930 14,930 15,690 15,690 6141-PENSIONS-PERA 12,018 12,725 11,983 17,205 17,385 5,767 18,060 18,060 18,980 18,980 6142-WORKERS COMPENSATION 856 1,046 897 1,355 1,375 559 1,940 1,940 2,145 2,145 6144-LONG-TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE 313 379 268 630 630 114 655 655 690 690 6145-MEDICAL INSURANCE 29,898 35,401 22,458 46,130 44,965 8,206 47,650 47,650 50,470 50,470 6146-DENTAL INSURANCE 2,286 2,233 2,166 990 6147-LIFE INSURANCE-BASIC 13 16 13 19 6148-LIFE INSURANCE-SUPP/DEPEND 25 127 134 140 6170-EMPLOYEE PAID PREMIUMS -3,328 -2,827 0 -1,000 -1,200 0 -1,200 -1,200 -1,200 -1,200 6125-EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 54,110 63,483 50,259 81,870 80,885 21,740 85,525 85,525 90,445 90,445 6100-TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 215,193 255,946 211,476 311,290 312,655 99,356 326,340 325,340 343,480 342,480 6210-OFFICE SUPPLIES 25 50 11 100 100 0 100 100 100 100 6211-SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT 56 68 -85 100 100 582 100 100 100 100 6212-MOTOR FUELS/OILS 1,254 891 1,222 1,600 1,300 636 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 6215-EQUIPMENT-PARTS 33 551 0 250 0 45 250 250 250 250 6216-VEHICLES-TIRES/BATTERIES 132 0 501 250 250 0 250 250 250 250 6229-GENERAL SUPPLIES 0 407 0 100 100 0 100 100 100 100 6205-SUPPLIES 1,500 1,968 1,649 2,400 1,850 1,263 2,100 2,100 2,100 2,100 6237-TELEPHONE/PAGERS 1,229 1,301 1,836 1,400 1,400 978 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 6239-PRINTING 152 89 385 200 200 0 200 200 200 200 6240-CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE 0 0 0 159 6249-OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,210 49 120 2,080 27,000 0 27,000 27,000 27,000 27,000 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,591 1,439 2,342 3,680 28,600 1,137 28,600 28,600 28,600 28,600 6265-REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 200 200 0 200 200 200 200 6260-REPAIRS AND MAINTENA 0 0 0 200 200 0 200 200 200 200 6275-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL 160 270 0 300 300 0 300 300 300 300 6276-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP OTHER 0 0 0 500 500 0 500 500 500 500 6277-MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE 195 0 0 0 0 0 6280-DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 150 0 50 150 150 50 150 150 150 150 6281-UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 100 193 0 150 150 0 150 150 150 150 6270-TRNG/TRAVL/DUES/UNIF 605 463 50 1,100 1,100 50 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 6,696 3,870 4,040 7,380 31,750 2,450 32,000 32,000 32,000 32,000 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 6745-VERF CHARGES 2,540 2,540 2,540 2,540 2,540 1,058 5,890 5,890 6,070 6,070 6701-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 2,540 2,540 2,540 2,540 2,540 1,058 5,890 5,890 6,070 6,070 6700-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 2,540 2,540 2,540 2,540 2,540 1,058 5,890 5,890 6,070 6,070 6901-TOTAL DEBT SERVICE 0 0 0 0 6900-TOTAL DEBT SERVICE 0 0 0 0 224,429 262,356 218,057 321,210 346,945 102,864 364,230 363,230 381,550 380,550 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET 88 ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 06: CODE ENFORCEMENT-1013 COMPANY 1000: GENERAL FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND REVENUE 4145 Other Federal Grants-CDBG(DARTS Prog.; - 26,000 26,000 26,000 26,000 26,000 26,000 4218 Fines-Mowing&Snow Removal 2,100 2,100 2,100 2,100 2,100 2,100 2,100 Total 2,100 28,100 28,100 28,100 28,100 28,100 28,100 SALARIES 6110 Regular Employees 219,765 220,460 220,460 229,195 229,195 241,550 241,550 6113 Overtime-Reg 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 1,500 2,500 1,500 6110.1 Salaries-Other 7,155 8,810 8,810 9,120 9,120 8,985 8,985 6138 Medicare 3,325 3,360 3,360 3,490 3,490 3,670 3,670 6139 FICA 14,225 14,370 14,370 14,930 14,930 15,690 15,690 6141 Pension-PERA 17,205 17,385 17,385 18,060 18,060 18,980 18,980 6142 Work Comp Insurance 1,355 1,375 1,375 1,940 1,940 2,145 2,145 6144 Long-term Disability Insurance 630 630 630 655 655 690 690 6145 Hospital&Life Insurance 46,130 44,965 44,965 47,650 47,650 50,470 50,470 6170 Employee Paid Premiums (1,000) (1,200) (1,200) (1,200) (1,200) (1,200) (1,200) Total 311,290 312,655 312,655 326,340 325,340 343,480 342,480 6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES Miscellaneous 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 6211 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT Miscellaneous 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 6212 MOTOR FUELS/OIL Fuel,Oil,etc.for 1 Vehicle 800 650 650 650 650 650 650 Vehicle 2(2020,2021,2022) 800 650 650 650 650 650 650 Total 1,600 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS Miscellaneous 250 - - 250 250 250 250 Total 250 - - 250 250 250 250 6216 TIRES/BATTERIES Two vehicles 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 Total 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 6229 GENERAL SUPPLIESI Code Enforcement Supplies 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS Mobile Phones-Verizon 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 Mobile lnsp#2 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 Total 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 6239 PRINTING/PUBLISHING Business Cards/Door tags 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 Promotional Plan Book - - - - - - - Total 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES DART Program - 26,000 26,000 26,000 26,000 26,000 26,000 Software Maintenance/Training-PIMS 1,000 - - - - - - Advisor Services/GoToMeeting 80 - - - - - - Immediate Abatement 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Total 2,080 27,000 27,000 27,000 27,000 27,000 27,000 6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT Car Wash 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 2nd Vehicle 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Total 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 6275 SCHOOL/CONF/EXP-LOCAL Workshops/Online Training 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 Total 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 6276 SCHOOL/CONF/EXP-OTHER Housing/Maintenance Code 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 Total 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 6280 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS MAHCO(3) 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 Total 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE Uniforms(2) 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 Total 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 6745 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT VERF-Vehicle Replacement Charges 2,540 2,540 2,540 5,890 5,890 6,070 6,070 Total 2,540 2,540 2,540 5,890 5,890 6,070 6,070 Total Net of Personnel 9,920 34,290 34,290 37,890 37,890 38,070 38,070 TOTAL EXPENSES $ 321,210 $ 346,945 $ 346,945 $ 364,230 $ 363,230 $ 381,550 $ 380,550 89 COMPANY DEPARTMENT BUSINESS UNIT ACTIVITY 1000 20 1200 Police DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY The Police Department encompasses a number of functions and activities in carrying out the department's objectives. The core functions of the department include; Police Administration, Dispatch, Patrol, Investigations and Records. The department also provides other activities which while not mandated by law assist the department in achieving the overall mission of protecting the community and improving its quality of life through service, education and enforcement. These other "value added services and programs" include; Special Enforcement Team, K-9 program, Community Service Officer Program, Dakota County Special Operations Team, South Metro SWAT Team, Dakota County Drug Task Force, Community Impact Unit, and a county-wide Electronic Crimes Unit. Following the Police Department budget summary below, is a discussion of the functions and activities of the department. MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2023 AND 2024 Our primary objective for 2023 and 2024 is to continue providing excellent services to our residents and to be mindful of the expectations placed on law enforcement because of high profile incidents in our nation. In 2023, we would like to hire an additional police officer to increase our sworn staffing. We would also like to add crime analysis capabilities by re-writing our property/evidence technician position. As our community continues to grow and evolve, we want be able to provide the same level of service. Objectives for 2023 and 2024 include: 2023 Objectives: 2024 Objectives: • Increase our authorized strength of 57 • Seek grant opportunities to increase sworn officers. our authorized strength • Convert our part time property and • Evaluate our long term staffing needs evidence technician position to a full time investigative aid. • Maintain adequate preventative patrol of the community and reasonable • Maintain adequate preventative patrol response times. of the community and reasonable response times. • Partner with Dakota County in • Partner with Dakota County in continuing the Coordinated Response continuing the Coordinated Response Pilot Program. Pilot Program. • Participation in the Dakota County • Participation in the Dakota County Drug Task Force with one officer Drug Task Force with one officer assigned full-time to this unit. assigned full-time to this unit. 90 2023 Objectives (cont.) 2024 Objectives (cont.) • Participation in the Dakota County • Participation in the Dakota County Traffic Safety Initiative participating in Traffic Safety Initiative participating in monthly targeted traffic projects. monthly targeted traffic projects. • Participation in the South Metro SWAT • Participation in the South Metro SWAT team maintaining our five officer team maintaining our five officer commitment. commitment. • Maintain our commitment to the youth • Maintain our commitment to the youth of our community through continued of our community through continued participation in the Police Explorers, participation in the Police Explorers, Teen Academy and the School Teen Academy and the School Resource Officer Program. Resource Officer Program. • Maintain our commitment to train • Maintain our commitment to train officers to handle crisis intervention officers to handle crisis intervention and mental health related incidents. and mental health related incidents. • Investigate criminal cases in a • Investigate criminal cases in a thorough timely manner. thorough timely manner. • Promote safety in the community, • Promote safety in the community, educating citizens in crime prevention educating citizens in crime prevention methods through block watch methods through block watch meetings, City newsletters, the City meetings, City newsletters, the City web site and newspaper articles. web site and newspaper articles. • Continue our efforts to maintain quality • Continue our efforts to maintain quality multi-family and rental housing in the multi-family and rental housing in the community, coordinating our effort with community, coordinating our effort with other city departments, utilizing the other city departments, utilizing the Rental Registration Ordinance, Rental Registration Ordinance, education of tenants and landlords and education of tenants and landlords and marketing the Crime Free Multi- marketing the Crime Free Multi- Housing program devoting one patrol Housing program devoting one patrol officer to this program. officer to this program. 91 • Continue our Crime Prevention • Continue our Crime Prevention programs including maintaining, if not programs including maintaining, if not increasing, the number of increasing, the number of neighborhood watch groups, Night to neighborhood watch groups, Night to Unite, Adult Citizens Academy, Teen Unite, Adult Citizens Academy, Teen Citizens Academy, alcohol server Citizens Academy, alcohol server training and the retail crime prevention training and the retail crime prevention program. program. • Continue efforts to be sustainable • Continue efforts to be sustainable through our purchasing and through our purchasing and operations. Examples include training operations. Examples include training more staff members on bike patrol and more staff members on bike patrol and creating a police support building that creating a police support building that is environmentally friendly. is environmentally friendly. IMPACT MEASURES / PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual Actual Actual Projected Projected Rem 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 # Calls for Service 41,752 34,524 36,380 41,000 _ 42,000 Traffic Citations 5,017 2,081 _ 3,157 3,500 _ 4,000 Responses to Accidents 1,197 909 1,076 1,200 1,300 Detective Investigations 514 503 376 450 500 92 PERSONNEL—AUTHORIZED STAFFING LEVELS • A proposal is pending to re-organize the police administration to remove the rank of Captain and include Chief(1), Deputy Chief(1)and Lieutenant(2) Position 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 ADMINISTRATION Chief 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Deputy Chief 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 Captain 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 Lieutenant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 Police Administrative Mgr.* 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 PATROL Patrol Sergeant 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Patrol Officer 26 26 26 26 27 28 29 29 29 30 K9 Dog(Handler(s)counted in patrol off.) 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 SET Officer 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 School Resource Officer 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Community Service Officer 6 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 NCOP Sergeant 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Multi-Family Housing Officer 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Retail Crime Officer 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Crime Prevention Specialist* 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 INVESTIGATIONS Detective Sergeant 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Detective 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Drug Task Force Detective 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Electronic Crimes Unit Officer 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Evidence & Property Tech.* 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 Evidence & Investigative Aid* 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 RECORDS Records Unit Supervisor* 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lead Records Technician* 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Records Technicians* 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Police Records Assistant* 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Total Sworn Personnel 51 52 52 52 53 54 55 55 56 57 Total Support Personnel 16 16 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 *Support Personnel VOLUNTEER ENGAGEMENT Adopted Adopted Adopted Adopted Adopted Projected 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Police Explorers 14 19 19 19 19 19 Chaplains 5 6 6 6 6 6 93 Summary Budget Department 20 Police 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Revenue: 4250 Fees-Accidents Reports 365 215 140 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 4226 Fees-Other Public Safety - - - 10,200 10,200 10,200 10,200 4259 Fees-Liason Officer 173,801 174,122 122,408 173,800 176,900 183,045 212,110 4141 Fees-Post Board Reimb Cont Ed 50,703 47,046 49,458 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 4141 Other 36,298 18,087 35,002 66,900 70,000 70,000 80,000 4150-Opioid Settlement - - - - - 39,000 53,800 5345 Reimburse Police Special Detail 124,836 39,354 58,098 57,000 70,000 70,000 75,000 4140 Aid-State Police 462,557 489,879 473,417 465,000 500,000 515,000 530,000 848,560 768,703 738,523 789,900 844,100 904,245 978,110 Expenditures: Salaries&Wages 5,904,031 6,191,812 6,208,268 6,353,980 6,540,495 7,012,415 7,367,025 Employee Benefits 2,095,460 2,261,393 2,380,846 2,388,465 2,556,145 2,885,140 3,082,880 Supplies 224,538 182,197 208,585 209,750 249,050 297,430 307,050 Contractual Services 1,086,365 1,107,276 1,013,180 1,112,670 1,042,900 945,000 952,500 Utilities 1,038 1,140 1,180 1,000 1,200 1,200 1,200 Repairs&Maintenance 36,142 35,165 27,075 31,470 48,120 42,470 46,120 Training/Travel/Dues 165,372 148,140 169,139 171,115 206,015 236,485 243,285 Other Expenses 22,545 20,156 24,384 28,000 28,000 28,900 29,100 Capital Outlay 239,045 262,000 288,200 288,200 296,800 304,200 311,810 9,774,536 10,209,278 10,320,856 10,584,650 10,968,725 11,753,240 12,340,970 Net addition to(use of)general (8,925,976) (9,440,575) (9,582,333) (9,794,750) (10,124,625) (10,848,995) (11,362,860) revenues 2023 CAPITAL OUTLAY The department's vehicle replacements are included in the Vehicle and Equipment Replacement Fund, the annual charge to the Police Department is $304,200 for 2023. 94 ACTIVITIES AND FUNCTIONS The following is a discussion of the activities and functions of the Police Department, including estimated costs for performing each function. All of the costs identified in each activity discussion are included in the department-wide budget above or within other departments, for example, the Data Processing Department budget includes the costs for the LOGIS system. POLICE DEPARTMENT BUSINESS UNITS The majority of the police departments in the United States consist of five distinct business units: • Administration • Dispatch • Patrol • Investigations • Records These business units encompass the activities that must take place for a police department to exist. They will vary in relation to the size of the department. For example, in a very small police department, serving a small population, the demand for service is less and there may not be an investigation division or a records unit. That does not mean that these duties are not performed, rather it means that patrol officers perform these duties. The administrative unit may consist of a single person, the chief of police, who may also work as a patrol officer. With the demands placed upon a department the size of Apple Valley, a certain level of specialization must take place to ensure that we operate efficiently. Cost Analysis and Assumptions Used This analysis will capture the majority of the costs involved with and allocated to the various business units and programs in the Department. While it is fairly easy to capture salary and benefit costs associated with the various business units and programs, it is more difficult to assign costs such as dispatching fees and technology charges to one specific area. Therefore, you will note costs that are assessed against every employee in the Department. This is due in part to the impact that dispatching, records management, field based reporting, and data connections have on every employee. We have grouped these costs under the heading of technology. Some of the major costs captured in this assessment include, but are not limited to: • Dakota Communication Center Fees • Cellular Communication Charges • Criminal Justice Data Network Fees • Digital Dictation System Fees 95 Police Administration Minnesota law requires that each law enforcement agency have a Chief Law Enforcement Officer (CLEO) who is a licensed peace officer. In Apple Valley, the CLEO is the Chief of Police and is responsible for the operation of the department. In a department the size of Apple Valley, there is usually a command structure between that of Police Chief and Police Sergeant. In the Apple Valley Police Department this command rank is that of Captain. There are two Captains. Evaluation of this rank structure is underway to ensure we are contemporary. Police Administration must be responsive to the needs and concerns of the community in the delivery of police services. It is the responsibility of the Police Administration to provide overall direction in the operation of the police department receiving guidance from the Mayor, City Council and City Administrator. Administration is also responsible for budget preparation, internal affairs investigations, developing department policy, making personnel recommendations, preparation of periodic and special reports, department evaluations, community relations, media relations, financial tracking, grant management, department training records and interdepartmental communications. The Police Chief and Captains are on call 24 hours a day and each has a police vehicle assigned to them. The following chart details the command structure of our department as well as our neighboring law enforcement agencies. City Population Chief Deputy Captain Commander Lieutenant Total Chief Apple 58,345 1 2 3 Valley Burnsville 61,870 1 3 4 Eagan 66,072 1 1 3 5 Lakeville 71,934 1 l 2 3 6 *world populationreview.corn 2023 Anticipated Costs — Police Administration Salary and Benefits Chief 214,885 Captains (2) 375,564 Police Administrative Manager 134,222 Uniforms 3,150 Vehicle Costs Capitalization 10,312 Fuel 5,056 Maintenance 1,364 Direct Costs Training 3,084 Technology 4,887 DCC 29,152 800 MHz Access 1,084 LOGIS 6,000 Memberships 727 Total $789,487 96 Police Dispatching Services In December of 2007, the City of Apple Valley, along with all of the Dakota County public safety entities, consolidated their public safety dispatch systems into jointly owned dispatch center, the Dakota Communications Center (DCC). Governance of this entity is in the form of a Joint Powers Agreement (JPA). Each member of the JPA contributes a percentage of the funds needed to operate the center based upon population and the number of Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) events. 2023 Anticipated Costs - DCC Direct Costs* Membership Fees 860,000 800 MHz Access 32,000 LOGIS (RMS & Mobile) 177,000 Total $1,069,000 *These direct costs are distributed equally among sworn personnel Patrol Division The Patrol Division is responsible for providing the department's frontline services. This division most often provides our first point of contact with the community and provides most of our services. These core services are those most visible on a daily basis. The Patrol Division contains the largest allocation of staff and the division is unlike any other division within the police department because of its visibility and the amount of contact they have with the citizens of Apple Valley. The Patrol Division is responsible for 24 hours a day, 7 days a week response to citizen-initiated calls for service, in addition to officer- initiated activity. The authorized strength of the Patrol Division is 7 Sergeants and 29 Officers. During 2021, the Patrol Division was responsible for handling over 36,000 calls for police service. The patrol officers are the first line of defense against threats to public safety. They are highly trained professionals, who at times unselfishly place themselves at risk in order to protect the community. City Population 1 Sergeant Patrol Officers Total Apple Valley 58,345 7 29 35 Burnsville 61,870 8 39 47 Eagan 66,072 9 40 49 Lakeville 71,934 8 37 45 Patrol Division Outcome Measures Year Calls for service DUI Arrests Traffic Crashes Citations Total Arrests 2021 36,389 120 1,076 3,157 739 2020 34,524 85 909 2,081 521 2019 41,752 216 1,199 4,482 1,152 2018 40,864 305 1,196 4,831 1,198 2017 40,079 176 1,168 4,471 1,206 2016 39,548 205 1,059 5,237 1,234 2015 35,510 171 1,022 4,926 969 2014 34,400 152 1,036 5,557 1,096 97 Overtime Hours We endeavor to keep overtime costs at a minimum within the department. We closely monitor overtime to minimize our costs. Due to long term staffing shortages and increased mandates on training, overtime is sometimes needed to backfill training requests or to allow vacations. It is important to note that under the labor agreements and the personnel ordinance, employees, with the exception of the Chief of Police and Captains, have the option of selecting compensatory hours in lieu of overtime pay for hours worked. Some aspects of overtime are administratively uncontrollable. Examples include mandatory court appearances outside of normal work hours, patrol shift extensions due to arrests, or high call for service volumes. The historical overtime record for all hourly sworn personnel is depicted in the accompanying table. Year Officer Hours Sergeant Hours Overtime Pay Compensatory Pay 2021 2,674 504 100,908 114,473 2020 3,358 724 149,894 136,713 2019 3,686 552 108,427 156,612 2018 3,570 561 103,330 147,816 2017 3,453 656 111,109 140,682 2016 3,836 654 190,705 159,017 2015 4,187 817 166,523 128,962 2014 4,150 811 152,735 129,000 2013 4,149 714 160,962 108,684 2012 3,689 844 129,780 108,441 2023 Anticipated Costs - Patrol Division Salary and Benefits Sergeants (7) 1,149,218 Officers (29) 3,970,854 Uniforms (36) 37,800 Vehicle Costs Capitalization 185,616 Fuel 91,008 Maintenance 24,552 Direct Costs Training 37,008 Technology 58,644 DCC 524,736 800 MHz Access 19,512 LOGIS 108,000 General Supplies & Equipment 59,256 Total $6,266,204 98 Detective Unit All but the smallest police departments in the United States have a specialized unit that conducts criminal investigations. In Apple Valley, this unit is staffed by Detectives. The Detectives investigate crimes requiring time and expertise beyond the capacity of the generalized investigations that uniformed patrol officers handle. Detectives receive specialized training in areas such as: • Homicide Investigation • Fraud • Internet Crimes Against Children • Sexual Assault • Child Abuse and Neglect • Robbery • Interview and Interrogation • Surveillance In addition to conducting criminal investigations, this unit is also responsible for: • Adult and Child Protection case review and assistance • Liquor License background investigations. • Massage Business/Therapist License background investigations. • Pre-employment investigations on potential city employees. • Solicitor permit background investigations. • Coordination of predatory sexual offender registration compliance. • Assisting the Fire Department with investigation of suspicious fires. • Conducting community education in such areas as Internet Safety. Detective Unit Outcome Measures Year Total Cases Cases per Detective 2021 376 75 2020 503 100 2019 514 102 2018 561 112 2017 760 152 2016 562 113 2015 613 123 2014 512 128 2013 450 113 2012 568 142 99 2023 Anticipated Costs — Detective Unit Salary and Benefits Detective Sergeant (1) 167,960 Detectives (5) 750,570 Property Room Clerk 41,496 Uniforms (6) 6,300 Vehicle Costs Capitalization 30,936 Fuel 15,168 Maintenance 4,092 Direct Costs Training 6,168 Technology 9,774 DCC 87,456 800 MHz Access 3,252 LOGIS 18,000 General Supplies & Equipment 11,522 Total $1,152,694 Records Unit The police department's role in the criminal justice system is to conduct investigative inquiries and gather facts. Every police department must document information that is obtained during investigations. This information must be maintained, searchable, and retrievable. The vast majority of the information and data created and stored by our agency is considered public data. As such, this data must be retrieved and released to the public upon demand. It is the responsibility of the records unit to process, retain, retrieve and forward this information. The unit is responsible for data entry concerning missing and wanted persons, stolen vehicles, stolen property and a host of other things that must be entered into the state and federal criminal information systems. These systems are highly controlled and monitored by both the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension. The data entries are closely monitored for accuracy, and we are subject to an annual audit which not only verifies the accuracy of each entry but also verifies our policies, procedures and practices that provide for the overall security of the system. Records Unit Outcome Measures Year Incident Data Practices Permits to Reports Requests Purchase Processed Processed Firearms 2021 7,041 3,933 487 2020 6,806 3,514 1,007 2019 7,005 3,336 378 2018 7,127 4,200 388 2017 7,555 4,200 446 2016 7,468 4,100 518 2015 7,297 3,397 480 2014 7,114 3,111 419 100 The Records Unit consists of a Lead Records Technician, five Records Technicians and one part- time Records Clerk. 2023 Anticipated Costs— Records Unit Salary and Benefits Lead Records Technician (1) 102,232 Records Technicians (5) 439,920 Records Clerk— Part-time (1) 18,356 Uniforms 1,500 Direct Costs Training 1,500 Technology 11,403 LOGIS 21,000 Specialized Equipment 2,250 Total $598,161 VALUE ADDED SERVICES AND PROGRAMS This section of our analysis addresses the "value added services" delivered by the police department. These services are not mandated by law, but they assist the department in achieving the overall mission of protecting our community and improving its quality of life through service, education and enforcement. It is important to note that if these programs were eliminated only a portion of their costs would result in a budgetary savings for the City of Apple Valley. For example, if you eliminate the School Resource Officer program, the department would still need to be adequately staffed to handle the requests for police services that come from the students and staff in the various school district facilities located in our community. Value Added Services and Programs — Patrol Division Police K-9 Program Program Purpose The safety of the public and police officers is the primary reason for having a K-9 program in our department. Our department fields two dogs and their officer/handler. This program is assigned to the Patrol Division. Police departments utilize dogs because of their keen sense of smell that allows them to locate suspects who are hiding. Police dogs are valuable when it comes to searching large buildings due to the speed and thoroughness at which they function. Simply stated, police dogs are a force multiplier that can do the job better and more efficiently than a police officer can do on foot. Assisting officers to detect crime, including illicit drugs, and locate and apprehend criminals, is part of keeping our community safe. As such, it is in keeping with the department's mission. Conducting K-9 demonstrations is part of the continuous job of building a positive relationship between the police and the public, educating the public, and improving quality of life within the community. As a part of the overall evaluation of the K-9 program, we evaluate whether there is another government unit that should be performing this function or if this function should be contracted out to the private sector. Conducting searches for suspects and fugitives 101 and making arrests are the duties of law enforcement. There are private entities that do have specially trained dogs available to assist police departments. Some examples include search and rescue dogs and cadaver dogs. These dogs are available upon request on a fee or free basis and may be utilized, but the dog handlers are prohibited by state statute from practicing law enforcement without a license. We collaborate with other agencies to provide K-9 support in the event a canine is not available. In 2018, we expanded our K-9 program to two teams, a true "unit" with overlapping coverage and overlapping service lives of the dogs. When a K-9 unit retires, it takes 1-2 years for the program to be fully functional again, depending on the time of the year a K-9 retires. K-9 Team Staffing Comparisons City K-9 Teams Apple Valley 2 Burnsville 2 Eagan 2 Lakeville 2 2023 Anticipated Costs — K-9 Program Salary and Benefits: Officers (2) 273,854 Uniforms 2,200 Vehicle Costs: Capitalization 10,312 Fuel 5,056 Maintenance 1,364 Direct Costs: Food 2,000 Memberships 160 Specialized Equipment 1,000 Training 2,056 Technology 3,258 DCC 29,152 800 MHz Access 1,084 LOGIS 6,000 Veterinary Care 2,000 Total $339,496 Dakota County Special Operations Team (SOT) Program Purpose The Dakota County Special Operations Team (DCSOT) is a cooperative effort of public safety agencies in Dakota County. This team was developed as a part of our nation's response to the 9-11 terrorist attacks that occurred in 2001. The majority of the funding for the formation of the team was obtained through federal grants. The governing entity for the DCSOT is the Dakota County Domestic Preparedness Committee (DCDPC). 102 The DCSOT is comprised of firefighters and police officers from various public safety agencies in Dakota County. The members of the DCSOT are highly trained individuals that specialize in various response scenarios that are considered high risk but have a low frequency of occurrence. Some examples of the types of responses the DCSOT is trained for include hazardous materials response, weapons of mass destruction response, technical rope rescue, confined space rescue, and trench rescue. The DCSOT is available to assist agencies within Dakota County with incidents that require additional resources or the specialized skills they possess. The membership assigned to the DCSOT in 2022 by public safety agency and discipline is depicted below: Agency _ Fire Police Apple Valley 4 1 Burnsville 3 0 Dakota County Sheriff N/A 1 Eagan 4 1 Farmington 2 0 Hastings 3 0 Inver Grove Heights 3 0 Lakeville 1 0 Mendota Heights 1 0 Rosemount 2 1 South Metro Fire 6 N/A Northfield EMS 1 N/A Total Membership 30 4 DCSOT was called out fourteen times in 2021. 4/17/21- DEA— Partial Callout to assist with opening packages 6/10/21 —West St Paul PD — Light Tower for Crime Scene 6/21/21 — Rosemount PD — Partial Callout looking for evidence in storm sewers 7/18/21 — Burnsville — Rescue 1 used for scene lighting 8/24/21 to 9/7/21 — MN DNR— Partial Callout for communications equipment for wild fires 8/16/21 — Hastings Fire—Team Callout— Rope Rescue 8/25/21 — MN State Patrol —Team Callout— Extrication Team standby for protests at Capital 8/30/21 — Rosemount Fire— Hazmat Duty Officer Consult 9/7/21 — Edina PD — Partial Callout-Wide Area Search for missing person 9/20/21 —Apple Valley— Confined Space Duty Officer Consult 11/11/21 — Bloomington Fire —Team Callout—Trench Recovery 11/30/21 — Rosemount—All Hazards Standby— POTUS Visit 12/16/21 — Lakeville PD —Wide Area Search Duty Officer consult 12/23/21 — Eagan PD —Team Callout— Grid Search for evidence 103 2023 Anticipated Costs — Dakota County Domestic Preparedness Committee (DCDPC) & Dakota County Special Operations Team (SOT) Salary and Benefits Officer—Training Time (232 Hrs.)* 15,273 Officer— Overtime 1,200 Direct Costs Memberships 39,800 Total $56,273 *The costs depicted here represent the"lost opportunity" costs associated with this activity. Officer Brian Plantz is assigned to the DCSOT. He attends 160 hours of training to minimally maintain his current levels of certification for the team. He sometimes attends this training during his normally scheduled work week. As such, his normal workload in patrol goes undone. We do not backfill these hours. South Metro SWAT Team Program Purpose South Metro SWAT is a highly trained police tactical team. This team was developed to respond to high risk but low frequency incidents that occur throughout Dakota and Rice County. South Metro SWAT responds to a number of incidents throughout the region per year. These incidents include barricaded suspects, hostage rescue, crisis negotiation, high risk warrant service, and fugitive apprehensions. They also serve as a critical aid to the mobile field force which works to protect people and property during unrest. Our department contributes four officers and one sergeant to the team. An Apple Valley sergeant has been team commander since 2015 directing all training and operational aspects of the team. Our personnel undergo intensive specialized training to become members of the team. The team trains a minimum of 160 hours annually to maintain their skills. Every law enforcement agency in Dakota County, with the exception of Burnsville and Eagan, contribute members to South Metro SWAT. Burnsville and Eagan each field their own SWAT team to handle response situations in their communities. South Metro SWAT is comprised of approximately 50 individuals from its member agencies and four tactical paramedics. South Metro SWAT Personnel Agency Tactical Officers Crisis Negotiators Tactical Paramedics Apple Valley 5 2 0 Dakota County Sheriff 6 2 0 Faribault 0 1 0 Farmington 2 1 0 Hastings 2 1 0 Health East 0 0 4 Inver Grove Heights 3 0 0 Lakeville 4 3 0 104 Life Development _ 0 1 0 Mendota Heights 0 0 0 Northfield 2 0 0 Northfield EMS 0 1 0 Rosemount 3 0 0 Rice County 3 1 0 South Saint Paul 3 0 0 West Saint Paul 2 1 0 Total Membership 38 14 4 South Metro SWAT Response Data Location 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 Apple Valley 3 3 2 3 2 2 2 4 5 2 1 Burnsville 2 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 Dakota 2 1 1 0 3 2 0 0 2 2 0 County Eagan _ 2 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Faribault 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Farmington 0 1 1 2 3 2 2 1 1 0 1 — Hastings 0 2 2 1 3 1 1 1 2 0 3 Inver Grove 1 2 1 2 2 0 2 1 2 1 1 Heights Lakeville 0 0 2 1 2 1 1 0 2 2 1 Mendota 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 Heights Northfield 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Rice County 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Rosemount 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Saint Paul 1 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 South Saint 4 3 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 Paul Washington 1 2 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 County West Saint 3 0 2 4 0 1 2 1 0 4 1 Paul Other 5 3 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 27 29 20 16 23 12 15 13 18 17 13 Responses As a part of the overall evaluation of the South Metro SWAT program, we need to ascertain if there is another government unit that should be performing this function or if this function be contracted out to the private sector. Because the very nature of the types of incidents the team responds to involve law enforcement activities, these activities cannot be outsourced to the private sector. 105 2023 Anticipated Costs — DCMAAG Team Salary and Benefits Tactical Negotiator- Training Time* 12,639 Tactical Negotiator- Overtime 4,000 Tactical Officer- Training Time* 70,438 Tactical Officer- Overtime 20,400 Uniforms 1,000 Direct Costs Ammunition & Supplies 6,600 Memberships 16,000 Training 5,200 Total $136,277 *The costs depicted here represent the "lost opportunity" costs associated with this activity. In total, the Officers assigned to the DCMAAG Team spend 1,070 hours in training on an annual basis. They attend this training during their normally scheduled work week. We do not backfill these hours and as such, the normal work activity they would be engaged in is lost. Value Added Services and Programs — Support Services Division Dakota County Drug Task Force Program Purpose Since 1988, Dakota County law enforcement agencies have effectively addressed illegal drug activity through a multi-jurisdictional task force model. From 1988 through 1999, two multi-jurisdictional drug task forces operated in Dakota County: South Metro Drug Task Force and East Metro Drug Task Force. In 2000, the South Metro Drug Task Force and the East Metro Drug Task Force merged to create the Dakota County Drug Task Force (DCDTF), which is the primary agency assigned to investigate illegal drug activity in Dakota County and surrounding areas. Since the establishment of the DCDTF, Dakota County's population has grown and population demographics have changed. The growth and change in population, in combination with ever changing trends in illegal drug activity, such as the rise of methamphetamine, has resulted in a significant increase in drug and drug related crimes throughout the county. Dakota County, like many counties throughout our nation, is not immune from illegal drug activity and its negative effects. The following chart represents the increasing activity the DCDTF has been involved in. In Dakota County, in the last five years, law enforcement authorities have arrested over 4,500 individuals directly involved in the illegal manufacture, distribution, or possession of drugs such as cocaine, marijuana, methamphetamine, and ecstasy. 106 DCDTF Activity Incident Type 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 Arrests 646 943 1,203 1,173 1,141 1,138 Search Warrants 197 197 234 243 184 169 Executed Cash Seizures $821,756 $669,341 $1,086,137 $729,237 $355,974 $431,071 Vehicles Seized 0 1 6 _ 2 5 8 Firearms Seized 44 37 62 94 84 41 Cocaine (pounds) 2.55 3.6 34.99 rt 2 3.37 1.21 Ecstasy(doses) 154 188.5 224 45 502 Heroin (grams) 4,245.62 897.34 4,329.49 283 40.20 89.15 Methamphetamine 244.39 139.32 134.62 45 19.23 8.41 (pounds) Marijuana (pounds) 118.63 6.3 _ 81.39 I 119 307.20 97.08 Marijuana Plants 18 53 _ 0 _ 180 38 10 Oxycodone/OxyContin 2,662 6,375 9,885.5 278 470.5 221 (doses) In recent years, police investigations have attributed several homicides, assaults, robberies, burglaries, thefts, child endangerment and neglect to illegal drug use. The extent of the presence of drugs in Dakota County is further evidenced by the prevalence of large drug amounts being seized annually. Illegal drug activity in Dakota County is often connected to international drug traffickers. According to reports by the United States Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration, the majority of cocaine, marijuana and methamphetamine distributed in Minnesota and Dakota County is manufactured and delivered by Mexican drug traffickers. Once in Minnesota, these drugs are sold and distributed to local street gangs and independent dealers who operate and distribute the drugs in their local communities. Prior to the establishment of multi-jurisdictional drug task forces, individual police agencies in Dakota County were each responsible for drug investigations in their respective jurisdictions. Police agencies with limited and broader public safety responsibilities were slow to adapt to ever changing illegal drug trends and activities. Most of the investigation units ranged from one to seven detectives, many of whom had little, if any, expertise to effectively engage in proactive drug investigations. Valuable intelligence data was not collected, preserved, or shared with neighboring agencies. Cross-jurisdictional drug cases were often referred to an agency with sufficient resources to conduct follow-up investigations. When cases were passed among agencies, delays often resulted which in turn reduced the likelihood of a successful outcome. Consequently, most drug investigations and enforcement was limited to cases involving the incidental discovery of drugs when officers or detectives were involved in other types of investigations. Little, if any, proactive follow up investigations were conducted to identify the source of the drugs or the extent of involvement the suspect had in other illegal drug activity. 107 The Dakota County Drug Task Force is comprised of law enforcement officers from the following agencies: Apple Valley Police Department Lakeville Police Department Burnsville Police Department Mendota Heights Police Department Dakota County Sheriff Office Rosemount Police Department Eagan Police Department Savage Police Department Farmington Police Department South St. Paul Police Department Hastings Police Department West St. Paul Police Department New in 2023 is a membership fee for the Drug Task Force. Fixed costs to run the day to day operations (building rent, technology, furniture, etc) was covered through the use of grants and forfeiture funds. State laws have changed reducing these funding opportunities. However, the city has accepted a settlement related to opioid use and those settlement fees will cover the new membership fees along with some of the personnel costs associated with our drug task force officer. 2023 Anticipated Costs — Dakota County Drug Task Force Salary and Benefits Detective (1) 150,114 Over-time Pay (Estimated) 17,000 Uniforms 1,050 Vehicle Costs Lease 4,500 Fuel 2,528 Maintenance 682 Direct Costs DTF Membership Fee 16,667 Training 1,028 Technology 1,629 DCC 14,576 800 MHz Access 542 LOGIS 3,000 Total $213,2316 Dakota County Electronic Crimes Unit Program Purpose Beginning with the development of the first computers, technology has become an increasingly important part of our lives and as technology has evolved, so has its role in criminal activities. With the development of the internet and the exponential increase in the power of electronic devices both desktop and handheld, technological devices have become one of the premier focal points of any serious investigation. As the importance of proper examination of technological devices has become increasingly important it has become apparent that simply purchasing software to 108 occasionally mirror hard-drives is a totally inadequate approach. Developing highly trained examiners and continually updating forensic capabilities is now the expectation from the citizenry, prosecutors, and courts. Developing this capability within each police agency is impractical and can be cost prohibitive. Based on the successes of cooperative efforts experienced by the law enforcement community in Dakota County with such groups as the Multi-Agency Assistance Group, Dakota County Drug Task Force, Dakota County Special Operations Team, and the Dakota Communications Center, a collaborative approach has been adopted. A pilot project began in January of 2015 which was permanently established in 2018 through a new joint powers agreement. The unit is located at the Dakota County SMART Center. The unit has been providing excellent service in a timely manner. Electronic Crime Unit Statistics Submitted Cases 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 Apple Valley 43 42 50 54 81 61 57 Burnsville 29 35 29 27 9 41 17 Dakota County 31 48 41 39 44 36 22 Eagan 1 0 0 0 2 3 0 Farmington 10 8 7 7 2 8 11 Hastings 28 34 23 24 29 36 25 Inver Grove Heights 23 17 12 10 19 2 2 Lakeville 47 27 28 29 24 1 0 Mendota Heights 6 6 4 5 5 4 1 Rosemount 24 20 16 24 16 8 4 South Saint Paul 28 16 27 23 35 23 26 West Saint Paul 20 15 26 11 12 12 18 Other 1 1 0 8 8 4 Drug Task Force 38 I 51 33 29 28 18 5 TOTAL 329 319 297 286 334 261 192 109 2023 Anticipated Costs -Technology Crimes Task Force Salary and Benefits: Detective (1) 150,114 Over-time Pay (Estimated) 4,000 Uniforms 1,050 Vehicle Costs: Capitalization 5,156 Fuel 2,528 Maintenance 682 Direct Costs: Training 1,028 Technology 1,629 DCC 14,576 800 MHz Access 542 LOGIS 3,000 Total $184,305 Community Impact Unit (CIU) Program Purpose The Neighborhood Collaboration Officer Program (NCOP) was established in 2007 and re-named to Community Impact Unit (CIU) in 2019. The mission is to increase the department's efforts in the area of problem-oriented policing. Problem-oriented policing is an approach to policing in which we conduct a careful examination of crime issues that are occurring in our community in hopes of discovering a new and more effective strategy for dealing with the issues. Problem-oriented policing places a high value on responses that are preventive in nature, that are not dependent on the use of the criminal justice system, and that engage other public agencies, the community and the private sector when their involvement has the potential for significantly contributing to the reduction of crime and quality of life issues. CIU has responsibility for the following activities: • Partnering with Dakota County Social Services on a Coordinated Response to Mental Crisis Calls • Partnering with over 100 organized neighborhood watch groups • Monitoring approximately 1,800 residential rental properties • Citizen's Police Academy • Teen Police Academy • Teacher's Academy • Child Passenger Safety Program • Safety Camp • Residential Vacation Check Program 110 CIU is staffed by: • One Sergeant who supervises the program. • Two officers who handle connections with multi-housing, retail crime, and mental health response. • One civilian Crime Prevention Specialist. The CIU Sergeant also has supervisory responsibilities for the SRO program and SET team. As a part of the overall evaluation of CIU, we need to ascertain if there is another government unit that should be performing this function or if it could be contracted out to the private sector. Because CIU is entrusted with developing strategies that target not only problem properties but problem chronic offenders, they were charged by the City Council to coordinate and create a unified and collaborative effort on the part of the city departments (police, fire, code enforcement, building inspection, community development and prosecution) to address these issues. The efforts of the CIU in reducing crime in multi-family and rental housing, educating landlords and tenants, making our schools safe and communicating crime prevention information to our citizens and businesses is in keeping with the department mission of protecting our community and preserving quality of life. Our department entered into a pilot program with Dakota County Social Services to better respond to mental health crisis calls. We have assigned our multi-housing officer to develop this program for our department and be the primary point of contact. As we move this into a long term project, we will have additional needs for this position. 2023 Anticipated Costs — Community Impact Unit (CIU) Salary and Benefits Sergeant 164,174 Retail Crime Officer 136,926 Multi-Housing Officer 136,926 Crime Prevention Specialist 117,416 Uniforms (3) 3,150 Vehicle Costs Capitalization 15,468 Fuel 7,584 Maintenance 2,046 Direct Costs Crime Prevention Meeting Supplies 1,600 Crime Prevention Promotional Materials 7,000 Memberships 310 Training 3,084 111 Technology 6,516 DCC 43,728 800 MHz Access 1,626 LOGIS 9,000 Total $656,554 Special Enforcement Team Program Program Purpose The Special Enforcement Team (SET) has been in existence since it was authorized by the City Council in 2001. At the time of its inception, the focus of SET was traffic law enforcement. This was accomplished through concentrated traffic enforcement in problem areas in our community. These problem areas were identified primarily through citizen complaints and areas with the highest accident rates. Since that time, the duties of SET have been greatly expanded. SET is responsible for conducting registration verification of predatory offenders living in our community. Predatory offender registration is a requirement under Minnesota Statutes for individuals who have committed violent crimes and have been discharged from correctional facilities. Under the authority granted in Minnesota Statutes, the department is required to verify the status of these individuals through home visits, updating their employment, contact, and other biographical information. SET also has responsibility for the service of arrest warrants issued by the District Court and state mandated compliance audits for the sale of alcohol and tobacco to minors. The Patrol Division as a whole could absorb all of the duties currently assigned to the SET. However, if you were to eliminate this program and reassign these duties, it would place additional time constraints on the patrol officers who are responsible for responding to the immediate calls for service from the public. Additionally, because of the current staffing levels and calls for service demands facing our patrol officers, the level of traffic law enforcement in the community would be reduced. Special Enforcement Team Outcome Measures Year Citations Predatory Offenders Tobacco Sales Alcohol Sales Issued Monitored Compliance Compliance (Quarterly) Audits _ Audits 2021 471 55 108 149 2020 466 58 0 2 (complaint based) 2019 935 52 100 164 2018 793 45 100 164 2017 933 80 100 164 2016 848 65 100 164 2015 746 56 105 155 112 2023 Anticipated Costs — Special Enforcement Team Program Salary and Benefits Officers (2) 273,852 Uniforms 2,100 Vehicle Costs Capitalization 10,312 Fuel 5,056 Maintenance 1,364 Direct Costs Training 2,056 Technology 3,258 DCC 29,152 800 MHz Access 1,084 LOGIS 6,000 Total $334,234 113 School Resource Officer Program Program Purpose This program assigns police officers to the role of a School Resource Officer (SRO). The SRO works at the various schools in our community in partnership with ISD 196 during the academic year. They are present in the schools to provide for the safety and security needs of the students and staff. We currently have three SROs partnering with ISD 196: One SRO is assigned to the three middle schools in our community (Falcon Ridge Middle School, Scott Highlands Middle School, and Valley Middle School) which have a combined student enrollment of 3,000; one SRO at Apple Valley High School with a student enrollment of 1,800; and one SRO at Eastview High School with a student enrollment of approximately 2,200. The three SROs have the potential of interacting with over 7,000 students on a daily basis. The SROs do much more than provide for the security and protection of the students and staff in our schools. The SROs play a significant role in intervening in home situations that are less than ideal and assisting students that are in crisis. They also play an educational role teaching students about the criminal justice system, drug abuse, self-respect, the safe operation of motor vehicles and build a relationship between the police and youth of our community. The duties of the SROs include: • Addressing crime and disorder problems affecting and occurring in or around middle and high schools. • Developing and expanding crime prevention efforts for students. • Educating students in crime prevention and personal safety. • Educating students in the area of conflict resolution. • Assisting school staff in the identification of physical changes in the environment that may reduce crime in or around schools. • Assisting school staff in developing school policies as they relate to crime and recommending procedural changes. As a part of the overall evaluation of the SRO program, we need to ascertain if there is another government unit that should be performing this function or if it can be contracted out to the private sector. In some areas of the United States, school districts have established their own police departments. Examples include: • Clark County School District Police Department in the Las Vegas Metropolitan Area • San Diego School District Police in San Diego, California • Los Angeles School District Police Department in the Los Angeles Metropolitan Area Currently, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 626 does not authorize school districts in the state to create their own police departments. 114 ISD 196 does provide funding for counselors, social workers and psychologists who work directly with students. They also have staff members that assist with school security. The SROs fulfill a unique role in that they have one foot in the community, performing traditional police work, and the other foot in the schools, emphasizing safety and serving as a role model for the students. We do not believe that the private sector could be as effective in this role. Minnesota has experienced violent incidents in schools in the past. Sometimes they have resulted in deaths. The SRO is first and foremost an armed police officer who is charged with protecting the students and staff. School Resource Officer Incidents Investigated Academic Apple Valley High Eastview High Middle Year School School Schools 2020 - 2021 157 173 161 2019 — 2020 101 116 83 2018 — 2019 241 278 234 2017 — 2018 258 82 246 2016 — 2017 219 157 245 2015 — 2016 213 217 214 2014 — 2015 227 223 251 2013 — 2014 203 254 263 2012 — 2013 267 339 313 2011 — 2012 223 247 228 *This statistic does not include the 36 calls for service handled by the SROs at the School of Environmental Studies and the Alternative Learning Center. 2023 Anticipated Costs —School Resource Officer Program Salary and Benefits Officers (3) 439,110 Uniforms 3,150 Vehicle Costs Capitalization 15,468 Fuel 7,584 Maintenance 2,046 Direct Costs Training 3,084 Technology 4,887 DCC 43,728 800 MHz Access 1,626 LOGIS 9,000 Revenue ISD 196 Reimbursement (pending, estimate only) (180,000) Total $349,683 City of Apple Valley 115 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) POLICE 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6110-SALARY-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 5,541,784 5,802,441 5,841,239 5,777,760 5,954,985 2,852,376 6,494,510 6,415,565 6,917,390 6,767,390 6111-SALARY PART-TIME 55,439 51,415 58,273 48,250 52,280 26,117 28,185 28,185 16,815 16,815 6112-SALARY-SEASONAL TEMP 282 0 0 0 6113-OVERTIME-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 268,002 290,224 221,209 290,000 290,000 140,510 290,000 290,000 290,000 290,000 6114-OVERTIME PART-TIME EMPLOYEES 468 2,062 697 20 6117-HOLIDAY PAY 172,993 159,381 178,456 140,800 128,090 42,152 130,915 130,915 148,660 148,660 6119-ANNUAL LEAVE 1,801 0 681 6121-INSURANCE CASH BENEFIT 22,500 23,940 23,700 13,200 6122-COMP REQUEST -157,435 -139,453 -115,307 -130,000 -130,000 -68,385 -130,000 -130,000 -130,000 -130,000 6123-SALARY-OTHER 227,170 245,140 277,750 277,750 274,160 274,160 6105-SALARIES AND WAGES 5,904,031 6,191,812 6,208,268 6,353,980 6,540,495 3,006,672 7,091,360 7,012,415 7,517,025 7,367,025 6138-MEDICARE 82,102 85,968 86,216 92,050 94,835 40,316 102,825 102,825 108,995 108,995 6139-FICA 29,975 34,899 37,290 38,120 39,710 17,649 43,065 43,065 46,600 46,600 6141-PENSIONS-PERA 915,478 1,013,502 1,012,432 1,060,880 1,092,340 465,363 1,184,320 1,184,320 1,253,855 1,253,855 6142-WORKERS COMPENSATION 214,685 239,811 317,349 270,075 360,085 194,844 583,580 583,580 649,155 649,155 6143-UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 9,200 0 0 0 6144-LONG-TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE 10,699 11,308 9,430 17,320 17,670 3,931 18,980 18,980 20,185 20,185 6145-MEDICAL INSURANCE 891,786 959,535 1,007,277 1,000,020 997,605 353,253 1,049,370 1,049,370 1,136,090 1,136,090 6146-DENTAL INSURANCE 66,561 65,848 63,088 28,155 6147-LIFE INSURANCE-BASIC 369 363 384 547 6148-LIFE INSURANCE-SUPP/DEPEND 16,631 16,739 16,215 8,647 6170-EMPLOYEE PAID PREMIUMS -142,025 -166,580 -168,835 -90,000 -46,100 -25,832 -47,000 -97,000 -47,000 -132,000 6125-EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2,095,460 2,261,393 2,380,846 2,388,465 2,556,145 1,086,871 2,935,140 2,885,140 3,167,880 3,082,880 6100-TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 7,999,491 8,453,205 8,589,114 8,742,445 9,096,640 4,093,543 10,026,500 9,897,555 10,684,905 10,449,905 6210-OFFICE SUPPLIES 6,794 6,360 6,386 8,400 8,400 3,434 8,400 8,400 8,400 8,400 6211-SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT 29,320 23,860 17,606 18,850 26,500 2,756 26,500 26,500 26,500 26,500 6212-MOTOR FUELS/OILS 87,074 54,378 84,843 91,500 102,250 47,729 149,130 149,130 150,000 150,000 6215-EQUIPMENT-PARTS 30,586 24,593 18,397 19,350 24,100 12,658 26,100 26,100 29,100 29,100 6216-VEHICLES-TIRES/BATTERIES 9,621 10,106 6,857 10,000 10,000 7,276 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 6229-GENERAL SUPPLIES 61,142 62,899 74,496 61,650 77,800 38,293 77,300 77,300 83,050 83,050 6205-SUPPLIES 224,538 182,197 208,585 209,750 249,050 112,146 297,430 297,430 307,050 307,050 6231-LEGAL SERVICES 32 6235-CONSULTANT SERVICES 12,994 13,141 9,409 7,500 7,500 8,058 7,500 7,500 8,500 8,500 6237-TELEPHONE/PAGERS 57,247 50,834 50,791 57,550 59,550 25,675 61,550 61,550 61,750 61,750 6238-POSTAGE/UPS/FEDEX 1,162 103 155 400 400 133 400 400 400 400 6239-PRINTING 4,558 4,392 2,384 5,550 5,550 5,729 5,550 5,550 6,650 6,650 6240-CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE 959 1,123 1,012 1,400 1,600 252 1,600 1,600 1,800 1,800 6249-OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,009,446 1,037,683 949,429 1,040,270 968,300 535,718 868,400 868,400 873,400 873,400 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,086,365 1,107,276 1,013,180 1,112,670 1,042,900 575,597 945,000 945,000 952,500 952,500 6255-UTILITIES-ELECTRIC 1,038 1,140 1,180 1,000 1,200 1,601 1,200 1,200 1 200 1,200 6250-UTILITIES 1,038 1,140 1,180 1,000 1,200 1,601 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 6265-REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 28,065 21,843 27,075 31,470 48,120 14,852 47,470 42,470 51,120 46,120 6266-REPAIRS-BUILDING 8,078 13,322 0 0 6260-REPAIRS AND MAINTENA 36,142 35,165 27,075 31,470 48,120 14,852 47,470 42,470 51,120 46,120 6275-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL 24,049 19,848 39,014 32,850 36,850 11,818 40,850 40,850 40,850 40,850 6276-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP OTHER 14,807 2,471 8,318 9,810 30,910 15,995 30,110 30,110 30,110 30,110 6277-MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE 0 0 54 0 6278-SUBSISTENCE ALLOWANCE 0 0 18 0 6280-DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 43,477 38,916 39,402 48,955 50,255 24,998 70,425 70,425 76,125 76,125 6281-UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 83,039 86,906 82,333 79,500 88,000 71,256 95,100 95,100 96,200 96,200 6270-TRNG/TRAVL/DUES/UNIF 165,372 148,140 169,139 171,115 206,015 124,068 236,485 236,485 243,285 243,285 City of Apple Valley 116 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) POLICE 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 1,513,455 1,473,918 1,419,159 1,526,005 1,547,285 828,265 1,527,585 1,522,585 1,555,155 1,550,155 6310-RENTAL EXPENSE 22,046 20,322 20,629 20,400 20,400 7,376 21,300 21,300 21,500 21,500 6321-CASH OVER/SHORT 5 0 0 0 6333-GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS -95 -146 -163 -89 6399-OTHER CHARGES 589 -21 3,917 7,600 7,600 -147 7,600 7,600 7,600 7,600 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES 22,545 20,156 24,384 28,000 28,000 7,140 28,900 28,900 29,100 29,100 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES 22,545 20,156 24,384 28,000 28,000 7,140 28,900 28,900 29,100 29,100 6501-TAXABLE/NON-TAXABLE MISC RESAL 0 0 0 0 6500-TOTAL EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 6720-CAPITAL OUTLAY-FURNITURE&FIX 0 0 0 0 0 0 6740-CAPITAL OUTLAY-MACH/EQ/OTHER 825 0 0 0 0 0 6745-VERF CHARGES 238,220 262,000 288,200 288,200 296,800 123,667 304,200 304,200 311,810 311,810 6701-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 239,045 262,000 288,200 288,200 296,800 123,667 304,200 304,200 311,810 311,810 6700-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 239,045 262,000 288,200 288,200 296,800 123,667 304,200 304,200 311,810 311,810 9,774,536 10,209,278 10,320,857 10,584,650 10,968,725 5,052,615 11,887,185 11,753,240 12,580,970 12,340,970 117 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 20: POLICE-1200 COMPANY 1000: GENERAL FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND REVENUES: 4250 Accident Reports 1,000 1,000 1000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 4226 Other Public Safety Fees 10,200 10,200 10,200 10,200 10,200 10,200 10,200 4259 ISD 196 Fees(SRO Program) 163,600 163,600 163,600 183,045 183,045 212,108 212,110 5345 Police Special Detail(Extra Duty) 57,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 75,000 75,000 4150 Opioid Settlement - - - - 39,000 - 53,800 4140 State Aid-Police PERA Aid 465,000 500,000 500,000 515,000 515,000 530,000 530,000 4141 Post Board Training Reimbursement 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 4141 Reimbursements:Traffic Safety+POST+SOT 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 65,000 65,000 4141 Ballastic Vest Reimbursement 6,900 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 15,000 15,000 TOTAL REVENUES 779,700 830,800 830,800 865,245 904,245 924,308 978,110 SALARIES 6110 Regular Employees 5,777,760 5,954,985 5,881,570 6,494,510 6,415,565 6,917,390 6,767,390 6111 Salary-Part-time 48,250 52,280 52,280 28,185 28,185 16,815 16,815 6113 Overtime-Regular 290,000 290,000 290,000 290,000 290,000 290,000 290,000 6122 Comp Request (130,000) (130,000) (130,000) (130,000) (130,000) (130,000) (130,000) 6117 Holiday/Invest Stipend/Master Pat 140,800 128,090 128,090 130,915 130,915 148,660 148,660 6123 Salaries-Other 227,170 245,140 243,775 277,750 277,750 274,160 274,160 6138 Medicare 92,050 94,835 94,160 102,825 102,825 108,995 108,995 6139 FICA 38,120 39,710 39,710 43,065 43,065 46,600 46,600 6141 Pension-PERA 1,060,880 1,092,340 1,084,060 1,184,320 1,184,320 1,253,855 1,253,855 6142 Work Comp Insurance 270,075 360,085 357,260 583,580 583,580 649,155 649,155 6144 Long-term Disability Insurance 17,320 17,670 17,545 18,980 18,980 20,185 20,185 6145 Hospital&Life Insurance 1,000,020 997,605 993,095 1,049,370 1,049,370 1,136,090 1,136,090 6170 Employee Paid Premiums (90,000) (46,100) (90,000) (47,000) (97,000) (47,000) (132,000) Total 8,742,445 9,096,640 8,961,545 10,026,500 9,897,555 10,684,905 10,449,905 6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES Paper&Supplies 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 Ticket Writer Paper 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 Total 8,400 8,400 8,400 8,400 8,400 8,400 8,400 6211 SMALL TOOL&EQUIPMENT AED Units 4,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 Chemical Aerosol Replacement 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Clerical Headset Replacements - 250 250 250 250 250 250 Data Master Mouthpieces 100 250 250 250 250 250 250 Fire Extinguishers/Car Door Openers - 250 250 250 250 250 250 Forensic Computer Supplies 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 K-9 Equipment 2,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Portable Breath Testers 500 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Radar Units 2,500 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Tasers 8,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Total 18,850 26,500 26,500 26,500 26,500 26,500 26,500 6212 MOTOR FUELS/OILS Gas 87,500 97,950 97,950 144,130 144,130 145,000 145,000 Oil 4,000 4,300 4,300 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Total 91,500 102,250 102,250 149,130 149,130 150,000 150,000 6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS Batteries(Laptop,AA,AAA,C,D) 4,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 8,000 8,000 Bike Parts 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 Gun Parts Replacement 1,250 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 Patrol/Inv/Admin Vehicles 13,500 16,000 16,000 18,000 18,000 19,000 19,000 Squad License Plates 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 Total 19,350 24,100 24,100 26,100 26,100 29,100 29,100 6216 EQUIPMENT-TIRES/BATTERIES Patrol/Inv/Admin Vehicles 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Total 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES Less Lethal Ammo(12 gauge,.40mm,pepperball) 1,500 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 AED Batteries/Pads 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 5,000 5,000 Ammunition 18,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 Canine Supplies&Food 3,550 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 3,500 3,500 Cell Phone Batteries/Supplies - 1,000 1,000 500 500 1,000 1,000 Coffee/Water/Meeting Supplies 2,500 2,750 2,750 2,750 2,750 2,750 2,750 Crime Prevention Meeting Supplies 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 Crime Prevention Promotional Materials 5,500 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 Detention Supplies 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 First Aid Supplies 2,500 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 Flares 400 500 500 500 500 500 500 Flex Cuffs 100 500 500 500 500 500 500 Hearing Protectors - 500 500 500 500 500 500 Investigation Supplies 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 SWAT Supplies 6,600 6,600 6,600 6,600 6,600 6,600 6,600 Mentoring-Academy Supplies 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Narcotic Field Testing Kits 250 450 450 450 450 450 450 Patrol Supplies 3,800 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 6,000 6,000 Shooting Glasses 100 150 150 150 150 150 150 Targets/Gun Cleaning Materials 1,000 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 Taser Cartridges/Batteries 3,250 3,250 3,250 3,250 3,250 4,000 4,000 Total 61,650 77,800 77,800 77,300 77,300 83,050 83,050 118 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 20: POLICE-1200 COMPANY 1000: GENERAL FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND 6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES Canine Vet Services 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Mantoux&Hepatitis Test&Inoculations 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 Pre-employment Medicals&Psychologicals 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 6,000 6,000 Total 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 8,500 8,500 6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS Cellular Phone Services 39,000 41,000 41,000 41,000 41,000 41,000 41,000 Frontier Phone Lines 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 Verizon LTE 4G Wireless Services 16,000 16,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 Telephone Language Translation Service 2,300 2,300 2,300 2,300 2,300 2,500 2,500 Total 57,550 59,550 43,550 61,550 61,550 61,750 61,750 6238 POSTAGE/UPS/FEDEX UPS Expense 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 Total 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 6239 PRINTING/PUBLISHING Annual Report 100 100 1,000 100 100 1,000 1,000 Business Cards 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 Crime Prevention Materials 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Evidence Labels and Bar Codes 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 Forms/Stationery/Envelopes 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Misc Printing 500 500 500 500 500 700 700 Night to Unite Yard Signs 950 950 950 950 950 950 950 Total 5,550 5,550 6,450 5,550 5,550 6,650 6,650 6240 C.SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVAL Shredding Service 1,400 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,800 1,800 Total 1,400 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,800 1,800 6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES Dakota 911 Fees(General&Capital Projects) 1,032,170 960,000 960,000 860,000 860,000 865,000 865,000 Background Investigation Fees 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Consolidated Lead Evaluation and Reporting 3,600 3,800 3,900 3,900 3,900 3,900 3,900 Evidentiary Impound&Tow Fees 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 Total 1,040,270 968,300 968,400 868,400 868,400 873,400 873,400 6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC Dakota Electric and Excel Energy 2,000 2,400 2,400 2,400 2,400 2,400 2,400 Reimbursement from Eagan PD for Range (1,000) (1,200) (1,200) (1,200) (1,200) (1,200) Total 1,000 1,200 2,400 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT ** = Service Contract "*"Digital Dictation 1,670 1,670 1,670 1,670 1,670 1,670 1,670 ***Konica Copiers Maintenance 4,800 4,800 4,800 4,800 4,800 4,800 4,800 ***Digital ICV/Body Cam Server Maint - 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 ***Motorola Radio Extended Warranty - 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 ***Evidence System Software Maintenance 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 Car Washes 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 Digital ICV/Body Cam Repairs 3,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 6,000 6,000 LOGIS Mobiles Support Maintenance 43,450 45,190 45,190 47,360 47,000 48,000 48,000 LOGIS Support is included in Data Processing (43,450) (45,190) (45,190) (47,360) (47,000) (47,000) (47,000) LOGIS RMS Support Maintenance 121,315 125,865 125,865 130,900 130,000 136,000 136,000 LOGIS RMS is included in Data Processing (121,315) (125,865) (125,865) (130,900) (130,000) (136,000) (136,000) Misc.Small Equipment Repairs 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Radar Recertification - 1,650 1,650 - - 1,650 1,650 Radio Repairs 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Squad Car-Not in House 6,000 7,000 7,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 Trend Reduction - - - (5,000) - (5,000) Total 31,470 48,120 48,120 47,470 42,470 51,120 46,120 6275 SCHOOL/CONF/EXP-LOCAL Canine Training School 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 Chaplains Training - 500 500 500 500 500 500 Crisis Intervention Training 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Explorer Training/Meeting Expense 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Meal Expense Reimbursement Training/Court 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 Rotary Meetings 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 Specialized Training-Crime Prevention/CIU 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Specialized Training-Detectives 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 Specialized Training-Firearm Instructors - 1,000 1,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Specialized Training-Patrol Officers 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 Specialized Training-Records Unit - 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 Specialized Training-Supervisors 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 Specialized Training-SRO 900 900 900 900 900 900 900 Specialized Training-Use of Force Instructors - 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Mandated Training 13,000 13,000 13,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 Total 32,850 36,850 36,850 40,850 40,850 40,850 40,850 6276 SCHOOLJCONF/EXP-OTHER Can-Am Narcotics Conference 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 Crime Prevention Conference 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 Police Licensure Tuition/Training Reimbursement - 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 IACP Conference - 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Juvenile Officers Institute 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 K-9 Drug Certification 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 FBI NA NW Chapter Training Conference - 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 SWAT-Annual Training Exercise 1,800 1,800 1,800 2,000 2,000 1,800 1,800 119 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 20: POLICE-1200 COMPANY 1000: GENERAL FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND 6276 SCHOOL/CONF/EXP-OTHER(Cont'd) MN Chiefs of Police Executive Training Institute 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 National Explorer Conference - 1,000 1,000 - - 1,000 1,000 Organized Retail Crime Conference 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 Out State Specialty Training - 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 Sex Crimes Investigator Conference 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 Special Operations Training Assn.Conference 1,600 3,200 3,200 3,200 3,200 3,200 3,200 State Explorer Conference 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 Total 9,810 30,910 30,110 30,110 30,110 30,110 30,110 6280 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS Association of Training Officers of MN 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 Crime Prevention Officers Association 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 Dakota County Drug Task Force - - 16,670 16,670 16,670 16,670 Dakota County Chiefs of Police Association 600 600 600 600 600 800 800 DC 800 MHz Access Fee 31,200 32,000 32,000 32,000 32,000 33,500 33,500 Explorer Re-charter 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 International Association of Chiefs of Police 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 SWAT Dues 10,000 12,500 12,500 16,000 16,000 20,000 20,000 Misc.Books&Publications - 500 500 500 500 500 500 MN Chiefs of Police Association 580 580 580 580 580 580 580 MN Law Enforcement Explorers Association 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 MN Multi-Housing Assn.Coalition 130 130 130 130 130 130 130 National FBI Academy Association/LEEDA 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 Police License Renewals($90 each) 1,980 1,980 1,980 1,980 1,980 1,980 1,980 Rotary Dues 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 Tri-County Investigators Association 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 U.S.Police Canine Association 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 Total 48,955 50,255 50,255 70,425 70,425 76,125 76,125 6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE Awards/Plaques/Commendation Medals 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 Bike Uniforms 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 ChaplainNolunteer Uniforms 500 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 SWAT 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Patches/Badges 2,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 Records Personnel Uniforms 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 Replacement Ballastic Vests 6,000 9,000 9,000 15,000 15,000 13,000 13,000 Sworn Officers 60,500 60,500 60,500 61,600 61,600 62,700 62,700 Sworn Officers New Hires 3,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 9,000 9,000 Uniforms&Badges,Explorer Program 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 Total 79,500 88,000 88,000 95,100 95,100 96,200 96,200 6310 RENTAL EXPENSE CJDN Connection Fees-BCA Desktop Query 5,760 5,760 5,760 5,760 5,760 5,760 5,760 CJDN Connection Fees-BCA Mobile Query 5,040 5,040 5,040 5,040 5,040 5,040 5,040 CJDN Connection Fees-BCA Submission 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 Konica Minolta Copier Leases 4,800 4,800 4,800 4,800 4,800 5,000 5,000 Vehicle Lease(Drug Task Force) 3,600 3,600 3,600 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 Total 20,400 20,400 20,400 21,300 21,300 21,500 21,500 6399 OTHER CHARGES Blood Tests 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 Outdoor Range Maintenance/Repairs 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Subpoena Fees 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 Total 7,600 7,600 7,600 7,600 7,600 7,600 7,600 6745 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT - VERF-Vehicle Replacement Charges 288,200 296,800 296,800 304,200 304,200 311,810 311,810 Total 288,200 296,800 296,800 304,200 304,200 311,810 311,810 Total Net of Personnel 1,842,205 1,872,085 1,857,485 1,860,685 1,855,685 1,896,065 1,891,065 TOTAL EXPENSES $ 10,584,650 $ 10,968,725 $ 10,819,030 $ 11,887,185 $ 11,753,240 $ 12,580,970 $ 12,340,970 TOTAL REVENUES(from Above): $ 779,700 $ 830,800 $ 830,800 $ 865,245 $ 904,245 $ 924,308 $ 978,110 NET ADDITION TO(USE OF)GENERAL REVENUES (9,804,950) (10,137,925) (9,988,230) (11,021,940) (10,848,995) (11,656,662) (11,362,860) 120 ••• ••••• AppValley Notes: 121 COMPANY DEPARTMENT BUSINESS UNIT ACTIVITY 1000 21 1290 Civil Defense DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY Civil Defense The City Council designates an Emergency Management Director. The Police Chief serves in this capacity. Duties include maintenance of the nine outdoor warning sirens, insuring that the Emergency Operations Center is properly equipped, updating and coordinating the periodic exercising the City's Emergency Operations Plan. The Police Chief works closely with the Fire Chief and the Dakota County Emergency Operations Director in coordinating Civil Defense activities. Over the past two years, civil defense has taken on a new meaning between a global pandemic and sustained unrest in the region. This resulted in the need for emergency purchases of gas masks, respirators, and other personal protection equipment (PPE)for staff members. Looking into the future, there will be a continued focus on civil defense including equipment, training, and physical security capabilities. MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2023 & 2024 Recent unrest and a pandemic have shown the importance of civil defense. Our police department faced many challenges from a global pandemic to widespread and sustained unrest. We have a renewed focus on this aspect of our responsibilities. An increase is requested for tools and equipment to continue outfitting our officers with personal protective equipment including protective masks. In 2023, we will continue ongoing maintenance on outdoor warning sirens including monitoring and replacement of DC power supply(batteries)as needed. The city maintains a service agreement with Frontline Warning Systems in order to maintain the Whelen siren system up to the current industry standards. Apple Valley Police Department supervisory staff will continue to receive training in the National Incident Management System (NIMS) by attending the various NIMS courses as they are available. The department will continue working to place the warning siren system into the city's CIP. We will also continue to evaluate the scale of unrest in the region and train/equip accordingly. An evaluation of the Special Operations Team was conducted in 2022 and a full time team leader was approved resulting in a budget increase for all member agencies. IMPACT MEASURES / PERFORMANCE INDICATORS 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Number of Warning Sirens 9 9 9 9 9 9 122 Summary Budget Department 21 Civil Defense 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Expenditures: Supplies 776 1,000 12,087 1,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 Contractual Services 15,352 17,752 17,852 18,151 18,550 42,500 42,700 Utilities 550 563 550 675 700 700 700 Repairs&Maint. 2,250 365 - 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Training/Travel/Dues - - - 100 100 100 100 Total Exp. 18,928 19,680 30,489 20,926 24,350 48,300 48,500 Net provision to(use of) general revenues (18,928) (19,680) (30,489) (20,926) (24,350) (48,300) (48,500) 2023 CAPITAL OUTLAY: None 2024 CAPITAL OUTLAY: None City of Apple Valley 123 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) CIVIL DEFENSE 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6105-SALARIES AND WAGES 6100-TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 6211-SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT 0 1,000 10,566 300 3,000 0 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 6215-EQUIPMENT-PARTS 776 0 1,520 700 1,000 0 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6205-SUPPLIES 776 1,000 12,087 1,000 4,000 0 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 6249-OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 15,352 17,752 17,852 18,151 18,550 17,852 42,500 42,500 42,700 42,700 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 15,352 17,752 17,852 18,151 18,550 17,852 42,500 42,500 42,700 42,700 6255-UTILITIES-ELECTRIC 550 563 550 675 700 275 700 700 700 700 6250-UTILITIES 550 563 550 675 700 275 700 700 700 700 6265-REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 2,250 365 0 1,000 1,000 0 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6260-REPAIRS AND MAINTENA 2,250 365 0 1,000 1,000 0 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6280-DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 0 0 0 100 100 0 100 100 100 100 6270-TRNG/TRAVL/DUES/UNIF 0 0 0 100 100 0 100 100 100 100 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 18,927 19,680 30,488 20,926 24,350 18,127 48,300 48,300 48,500 48,500 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 6701-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 0 0 0 0 6700-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 0 0 0 0 18,927 19,680 30,488 20,926 24,350 18,127 48,300 48,300 48,500 48,500 124 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 21: CIVIL DEFENSE-1290 COMPANY 1000: GENERAL FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND 6211 SMALL TOOL&EQUIPMENT Siren Maintenance Supplies - - - - Supplies 300 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 Total 300 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 6215 E BATTERIESI Siren Batteries 700 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Total 700 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES I DCDPC Annual Dues 15,601 16,000 16,000 39,800 39,800 40,000 40,000 Frontline Warning Service 2,550 2,550 2,550 2,700 2,700 2,700 2,700 Total 18,151 18,550 18,550 42,500 42,500 42,700 42,700 6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC Dakota Electric-Excel Energy 675 700 700 700 700 700 700 Total 675 700 700 700 700 700 700 I 6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT Routine Maintenance 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Total 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6275 SCHOOL/CONF/EXP-LOCAL Exercise Expenses - Total - - - - - - - 6280 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS AMEM 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Total 100 100 100 100 100 I 100 100 Total Net of Personnel 20,926 23,350 23,350 48,300 48,300 48,500 48,500 TOTAL EXPENSES $ 20,926 $ 24,350 $ 24,350 $ 48,300 $ 48,300 $ 48,500 $ 48,500 125 COMPANY DEPARTMENT BUSINESS UNIT ACTIVITY 1000 22 1295 Comm Sery Officer (CSO) DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY Community Service Officer A Community Service Officer (CSO) provides support in crime prevention, investigation, and response where full police powers are unnecessary and assists police officers in upholding law and order. CSOs work under the supervision of a patrol sergeant. They perform duties that don't require the level of training or expertise of a police officer, thereby freeing the officer to engage in activities that do require their attention. The duties of the CSOs include: • Fingerprinting citizens applying for certain licenses from state agencies or adoption. • Assisting patrol officers in performing traffic control, such as accident scene traffic control, special events control, and other similar situations. • Assisting officers in requesting and ensuring vehicle tows are completed at accident scenes and other arrest situations where a vehicle is involved. • Assisting in booking prisoners at the police station. • Handling dog bite calls, animal at large calls and injured animal calls. • Opening locked car doors for citizens. • Delivering City Council agenda packets. • Delivering the City Hall mail to the post office each day. • Deploying the radar display speed trailers as well as "Car 54". • Enforcing certain ordinance violations including selected parking violations. • Maintaining department supplies and equipment. • Shuttling squad cars back and forth from the police station to mechanics at CMF. • Transporting evidence to and from the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension for analysis. • Monitoring winter sidewalk snow shoveling complaints. • Fingerprinting residents who require it as part of job applications MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2023 and 2024 • Add additional CSO work hours • Improve our recruiting and hiring process through a graduated CSO program • Become more competitive in hiring with tuition assistance incentives • Continue providing quality non-sworn police service 126 IMPACT MEASURES / PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual Actual Actual Actual Projected Projected Item 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Number of Animal Licenses Sold 500 500 375 390 400 400 Regular Status Scheduled Hours Actual Actual Actual Actual Projected Proposed Position Title 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 CSO I/II 5,358 2,143 3,190 3,956 3,500 5,000 Summary Budget Department 22 Comm Sery Offic(CSO) 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Proposed Proposed Proposed Revenue: 4251 FEES-Animal Pickup 4,182 2,045 2,290 5,100 5,100 5,100 5,100 4032 LICENSE-Dogs 8,055 7,700 7,200 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 12,237 9,745 9,490 14,100 14,100 14,100 14,100 Expenditures: Salaries&Wages 40,553 52,270 69,827 82,540 94,635 101,095 106,625 Employee Benefits 6,096 8,519 11,008 16,340 18,700 24,465 26,290 Supplies 3,329 2,142 4,853 5,225 5,725 5,725 5,725 Contractual Services 3,671 2,716 3,188 6,150 6,150 6,150 6,150 Uniforms/Equipment 693 - 2,608 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 54,343 65,647 91,484 112,255 127,210 139,435 146,790 Net addition to(use of) (42,106) (55,902) (81,994) (98,155) (113,110) (125,335) (132,690) general revenues 2023 CAPITAL OUTLAY: None 2024 CAPITAL OUTLAY: None City of Apple Valley 127 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) COMM SERV OFFICER(CSO) 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6110-SALARY-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 282 81 236 0 76 0 0 6111-SALARY PART-TIME 37,988 50,448 62,557 78,120 87,010 31,920 93,200 93,200 99,075 99,075 6112-SALARY-SEASONAL TEMP 2,970 6114-OVERTIME PART-TIME EMPLOYEES 2,283 1,741 7,034 3,100 3,100 1,753 3,100 3,100 3,200 3,200 6123-SALARY-OTHER 1,320 4,525 4,795 4,795 4,350 4,350 6105-SALARIES AND WAGES 40,553 52,270 69,827 82,540 94,635 36,719 101,095 101,095 106,625 106,625 6138-MEDICARE 499 758 1,013 1,200 1,280 532 1,465 1,465 1,545 1,545 6139-FICA 2,133 3,188 4,329 5,120 5,475 2,277 6,270 6,270 6,610 6,610 6141-PENSIONS-PERA 2,160 2,383 1,785 6,190 6,620 1,607 7,580 7,580 8,000 8,000 6142-WORKERS COMPENSATION 1,305 2,190 3,881 3,830 5,325 2,861 9,150 9,150 10,135 10,135 6125-EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 6,096 8,519 11,008 16,340 18,700 7,277 24,465 24,465 26,290 26,290 6100-TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 46,649 60,788 80,835 98,880 113,335 43,996 125,560 125,560 132,915 132,915 6211-SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT 42 0 203 300 300 0 300 300 300 300 6212-MOTOR FUELS/OILS 2,774 1,955 4,483 4,750 4,750 2,733 4,750 4,750 4,750 4,750 6215-EQUIPMENT-PARTS 345 0 0 0 6216-VEHICLES-TIRES/BATTERIES 0 0 0 0 500 0 500 500 500 500 6229-GENERAL SUPPLIES 167 187 168 175 175 0 175 175 175 175 6205-SUPPLIES 3,329 2,142 4,853 5,225 5,725 2,733 5,725 5,725 5,725 5,725 6239-PRINTING 0 0 0 250 250 0 250 250 250 250 6249-OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,671 2,716 3,188 5,900 5,900 684 5,900 5,900 5,900 5,900 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,671 2,716 3,188 6,150 6,150 684 6,150 6,150 6,150 6,150 6260-REPAIRS AND MAINTENA 0 0 0 0 6281-UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 693 0 2,608 2,000 2,000 703 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 6270-TRNGITRAVL/DUES/UNIF 693 0 2,608 2,000 2,000 703 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 7,693 4,858 10,650 13,375 13,875 4,120 13,875 13,875 13,875 13,875 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 54,343 65,647 91,485 112,255 127,210 48,116 139,435 139,435 146,790 146,790 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET 128 ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 22: COMM SERV OFFIC(CSO)-1295 COMPANY 1000: GENERAL FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND 6110 SALARIES 6111 Salary-Part-time 78,120 87,010 87,010 93,200 93,200 99,075 99,075 6112 Salary-Seasonal Temp - - - - - - - 6114 Overtime PT 3,100 3,100 3,100 3,100 3,100 3,200 3,200 6123 Salary-Other 1,320 4,525 4,525 4,795 4,795 4,350 4,350 6138 Medicare 1,200 1,280 1,280 1,465 1,465 1,545 1,545 6139 FICA 5,120 5,475 5,475 6,270 6,270 6,610 6,610 6141 PERA 6,190 6,620 6,620 7,580 7,580 8,000 8,000 6142 Work Comp Insurance 3,830 5,325 5,325 9,150 9,150 10,135 10,135 Total 98,880 113,335 113,335 125,560 125,560 132,915 132,915 6211 SMALL TOOL&EQUIPMENT Cages,Traps, Repellent,Gloves 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 Total 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 6212 MOTOR FUELS/OILS Gas 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 Oil 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 Total 4,750 4,750 4,750 4,750 4,750 4,750 4,750 6216 EQUIPMENT-TIRES/BATTERIES Animal Control Trucks 500 500 500 500 500 500 Total - 500 500 500 500 500 500 6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES Dog Licenses 175 175 175 175 175 175 175 Dog Nooses/Miscellaneous Supplies - - - - Total 175 175 175 175 i 175 175 175 6239 PRINTING/PUBLISHING Printing 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 Total 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES Palomino Pet Hospital 5,900 5,900 5,900 5,900 5,900 5,900 5,900 Boarding Fees Recapture Credit - - - - Wildlife Trapping Service - - - - Total 5,900 5,900 5,900 5,900 5,900 5,900 5,900 6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE Community Service Officer Uniforms 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Total 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Total Net of Personnel 13,375 13,875 13,875 13,875 13,875 13,875 13,875 TOTAL EXPENSES 112,255 127,210 127,210 139,435 139,435 146,790 146,790 129 COMPANY DEPARTMENT BUSINESS UNIT ACTIVITY 1000 23 1300 Fire Department DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY The mission of the Apple Valley Fire Department is to reduce the loss of life and property by providing fire suppression, rescue services, non-emergency services, and fire and life safety education to the public. This is accomplished by training for and providing pre- emergency planning, fire protection, rescue, emergency medical services, hazardous materials response, natural or manmade disaster response, and emergency support when needed during other community crisis. Our priorities are life safety, property conservation, and environmental protection. These are achieved through our vision to be an innovative, effective, and progressive fire department. We are dedicated to the delivery of effective fire suppression, rescue services, and quality fire and safety education. We strive to offer the best available education and training to our firefighters, in preparation of meeting the needs and expectations of our citizens and visitors. Our training programs allow firefighters to receive classroom and practical education that is compliant with the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) National Incident Management System (NIMS), and the Insurance Services Office, Inc. (ISO). By striving for the goal of meeting nationally recognized standards of these agencies, the Apple Valley Fire Department is able to provide consistent, systematic, and proactive response to emergent and other public safety needs. We also participate in coordinated county-wide training and response which provide optimum use of resources and personnel across inter- and intra-jurisdictional organizations, should the need arise. Our goal of ensuring our residential and business communities meet all City Ordinances and Minnesota State Fire Codes is met through our fire prevention program. Fire prevention activities provide multiple fire and life safety educational and training opportunities to the residents, businesses, and visitors of our city. Scheduled fire inspections of new and existing commercial and multi-family properties provide additional and effective safety. MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2023 • Break ground for reconfiguring/construction of Fire Stations 1, 2 and 3 • Replace Fire Marshal's vehicle • Replace Firefighter's structural helmets MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2024 • Complete reconfiguring/construction of Fire Stations 1, 2 and 3 • Replace one Chief Squad • Replace Engine 3 130 IMPACT MEASURES/PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual Actual Actual Projected Projected Projected Item 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Fire/Rescue/EMS 2,148 2,094 2,307 2,200 2,200 2,200 Calls Response Times 5:53 avg 5:43 avg 5:48 avg 5:50 avg 5:50 avg 5:50 avg (minutes) Fire Inspections 1521 1573 950 1000 1000 1000 Firefighter Training 10,493 9,896 10,777 10,000 10,000 10,000 Hours Fire Safety Education 148 89 17 150 150 150 Programs Regular Status Personnel Schedule— FTE's Adopted Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Position Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Fire Chief 1 1 1 1 1 1 Fire Deputy Chief/Training 1 1 1 1 1 1 Officer Fire Marshal 1 1 1 1 1 1 Fire Inspector 1 1 1 1 1 1 Department Assistant 1 1 1 1 1 1 Part-Time Status Personnel Schedule In Hours Adopted Actual Actual Adopted Proposed Proposed Position Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Paid-on-Call Firefighters 28,563 28,070 28,838 29,500 29,500 29,500 (75) Firefighter Clerical 595 596 469 700 700 700 Assistant(PT) Station Cleaning (PT) - 282 367 360 360 360 131 Summary Budget Department 23 Fire 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Proposed Proposed Proposed Revenues: 5197 Lease Allina Space-Fire Station#1 34,587 36,859 39,400 39,400 39,400 43,100 44,500 4253 Fire Alarm Panels 1,075 1,724 661 1,000 1,500 1,500 1,500 4259 Fire Alarms&Fire Key Lock Boxes 3,649 3,150 1,750 10,200 3,100 3,100 3,100 4075/4078/4079 Fire Permits 43,400 13,216 41,909 36,000 37,500 37,500 37,500 4142 Fire Other Public Safety(Training) 38,843 15,623 38,136 24,000 18,000 24,000 18,000 121,554 70,572 121,856 110,600 99,500 109,200 104,600 Expenditures: Salaries&Wages 941,201 1,014,780 1,075,598 1,098,875 1,131,235 1,180,045 1,232,350 Employee Benefits 273,762 298,859 319,674 308,825 331,975 371,245 392,180 Supplies&Equipment 77,482 65,503 130,513 89,994 94,626 81,525 105,110 Contractual Services 84,010 76,209 78,855 88,730 80,510 84,310 88,065 Utilities 30,798 28,296 32,730 31,689 32,325 32,675 32,675 Repairs&Maintenance 112,840 70,293 70,388 72,377 72,967 72,965 72,965 Training/Travel/Dues 98,307 67,751 81,550 109,119 110,089 103,920 112,230 Other Expenses 3,121 2,081 (110) 3,650 3,800 3,900 3,900 Vehicle Replacement Charge(VERF) 337,050 388,400 407,800 407,800 418,000 428,450 439,160 Capital Outlay - - - - - - - Total Expenditures ' 1,958,570 2,012,172 2,196,998 2,211,059 2,275,527 2,359,035 2,478,635 Net addition(use)of general (1,837,016) (1,941,600) (2,075,142) (2,100,459) (2,176,027) (2,249,835) (2,374,035) revenues 2023 CAPITAL OUTLAY: 4991 Pickup Replacement (in VERF Fund) $ 32,300 Station 2 construction (in CIP Bond Fund) $3,050,000 Station 3 Temp Controls (in Fire Facilities Fund) $ 35,000 Structural Fire Helmets (in General Fund) $ 25,453 2024 CAPITAL OUTLAY: 4976 Chief Squad (in VERF Fund) $ 48,900 4987 Engine 3 (in VERF Fund) $ 576,800 City of Apple Valley 132 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) FIRE 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6110-SALARY-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 414,450 473,017 488,597 467,875 494,675 236,484 513,100 513,100 537,570 537,570 6111-SALARY PART-TIME 524,960 538,789 584,085 584,300 590,405 242,087 623,210 623,210 649,610 649,610 6113-OVERTIME-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 6,618 3,016 4,753 6,200 6,200 4,134 5,000 5,000 5,150 5,150 6119-ANNUAL LEAVE 1,476 0 6121-INSURANCE CASH BENEFIT 1,440 1,500 1,440 720 6122-COMP REQUEST -6,268 -1,542 -4,753 -4,134 6123-SALARY-OTHER 40,500 39,955 38,735 38,735 40,020 40,020 6105-SALARIES AND WAGES 941,201 1,014,780 1,075,598 1,098,875 1,131,235 479,291 1,180,045 1,180,045 1,232,350 1,232,350 6138-MEDICARE 11,656 12,494 13,161 13,935 14,300 5,764 17,110 17,110 17,870 17,870 6139-FICA 4,441 4,541 4,097 4,475 4,655 1,972 4,840 4,840 5,125 5,125 6141-PENSIONS-PERA 63,545 76,475 80,096 81,015 85,250 38,659 87,675 87,675 91,640 91,640 6142-WORKERS COMPENSATION 131,216 127,852 144,162 137,155 151,300 67,304 180,840 180,840 192,075 192,075 6144-LONG-TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE 819 959 824 1,375 1,425 352 1,470 1,470 1,540 1,540 6145-MEDICAL INSURANCE 73,455 93,616 96,114 82,850 80,845 38,000 85,210 85,210 89,830 89,830 6146-DENTAL INSURANCE 5,164 6,402 6,860 3,135 6147-LIFE INSURANCE-BASIC 27 31 33 47 6148-LIFE INSURANCE-SUPP/DEPEND 1,520 1,305 889 454 6170-EMPLOYEE PAID PREMIUMS -18,082 -24,816 -26,562 -11,980 -5,800 -4,384 -5,900 -5,900 -5,900 -5,900 6125-EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 273,762 298,859 319,674 308,825 331,975 151,301 371,245 371,245 392,180 392,180 6100-TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 1,214,963 1,313,639 1,395,272 1,407,700 1,463,210 630,592 1,551,290 1,551,290 1,624,530 1,624,530 6210-OFFICE SUPPLIES 330 110 3,258 225 225 105 225 225 225 225 6211-SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT 11,619 12,295 56,519 27,894 27,671 12,260 12,820 12,820 35,195 35,195 6212-MOTOR FUELS/OILS 22,760 15,144 21,207 18,720 21,750 12,173 22,500 22,500 22,500 22,500 6214-CHEMICALS 988 428 260 2,350 1,350 260 1,350 1,350 1,350 1,350 6215-EQUIPMENT-PARTS 14,860 14,925 15,620 13,490 14,490 5,286 14,490 14,490 15,200 15,200 6216-VEHICLES-TIRES/BATTERIES 759 6,147 3,031 3,200 3,200 119 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 6229-GENERAL SUPPLIES 26,166 16,453 30,618 24,115 25,940 5,656 25,940 25,940 26,440 26,440 6205-SUPPLIES 77,482 65,503 130,513 89,994 94,626 35,859 81,525 81,525 105,110 105,110 6235-CONSULTANT SERVICES 18,573 22,302 24,068 22,315 22,315 11,467 22,835 22,835 24,835 24,835 6237-TELEPHONE/PAGERS 11,787 10,997 10,385 13,040 11,040 5,809 11,240 11,240 11,240 11,240 6238-POSTAGE/UPS/FEDEX 381 24 64 300 300 703 300 300 300 300 6239-PRINTING 1,833 1,563 80 1,380 1,380 1,004 1,680 1,680 1,680 1,680 6240-CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE 2,448 2,422 2,553 2,460 2,500 1,145 2,570 2,570 2,570 2,570 6242-FIRE ALARM PLAN REVIEWS 0 0 0 0 0 0 6249-OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 48,987 38,902 41,705 49,235 42,975 24,131 45,685 45,685 47,440 47,440 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 84,010 76,209 78,855 88,730 80,510 44,260 84,310 84,310 88,065 88,065 6255-UTILITIES-ELECTRIC 16,056 18,252 18,738 18,300 18,300 8,927 18,350 18,350 18,350 18,350 6256-UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS 10,820 8,324 10,018 10,179 10,615 11,919 10,915 10,915 10,915 10,915 6257-UTILITIES-PROPANE/VVATER/SEWER 3,922 1,719 3,975 3,210 3,410 851 3,410 3,410 3,410 3,410 6250-UTILITIES 30,798 28,296 32,730 31,689 32,325 21,697 32,675 32,675 32,675 32,675 6265-REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 40,541 51,869 47,147 50,482 50,572 21,792 50,570 50,570 50,570 50,570 6266-REPAIRS-BUILDING 72,299 18,424 23,242 21,895 22,395 11,180 22,395 22,395 22,395 22,395 6260-REPAIRS AND MAINTENA 112,840 70,293 70,388 72,377 72,967 32,973 72,965 72,965 72,965 72,965 6275-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL 20,391 13,615 19,936 20,500 20,500 2,669 20,500 20,500 20,500 20,500 6276-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP OTHER 16,951 4,757 3,258 18,870 18,870 10,363 19,870 19,870 21,400 21,400 6278-SUBSISTENCE ALLOWANCE 1,600 500 418 2,500 2,500 1,479 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 6280-DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 1,737 4,785 2,171 3,100 3,100 2,546 3,300 3,300 3,300 3,300 6281-UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 57,628 44,093 55,766 64,149 65,119 38,661 86,750 57,750 68,530 64,530 6270-TRNG/TRAVL/DUES/UNIF 98,307 67,751 81,550 109,119 110,089 55,718 132,920 103,920 116,230 112,230 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 403,437 308,052 394,036 391,909 390,517 190,507 404,395 375,395 415,045 411,045 6310-RENTAL EXPENSE 0 550 0 600 600 550 600 600 600 600 City of Apple Valley 133 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) FIRE 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6333-GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS -130 -282 -140 -122 6399-OTHER CHARGES 3,251 1,813 30 3,050 3,200 2,536 3,300 3,300 3,300 3,300 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES 3,121 2,081 -110 3,650 3,800 2,965 3,900 3,900 3,900 3,900 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES 3,121 2,081 -110 3,650 3,800 2,965 3,900 3,900 3,900 3,900 6720-CAPITAL OUTLAY-FURNITURE&FIX 0 0 0 0 0 0 6745-VERF CHARGES 337,050 388,400 407,800 407,800 418,000 174,167 428,450 428,450 439,160 439,160 6701-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 337,050 388,400 407,800 407,800 418,000 174,167 428,450 428,450 439,160 439,160 6700-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 337,050 388,400 407,800 407,800 418,000 174,167 428,450 428,450 439,160 439,160 1,958,570 2,012,172 2,196,999 2,211,059 2,275,527 998,231 2,388,035 2,359,035 2,482,635 2,478,635 134 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 23: FIRE-1300 COMPANY 1000: GENERAL FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND REVENUE 4075 Permit-Fire Alarm/Sprinkler 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 4078 Permit Fireworks - 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 4079 Permit-Fire Alarm Inspections 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 4253 Fire Alarm Panels 1,000 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 4142 Fire Other Public Safety(Training) 24,000 18,000 18,000 24,000 24,000 18,000 18,000 4259 Fire Alarms&Fire Key Lock Boxes 10,200 23 23 3,100 3,100 3,100 3,100 5197 Lease Allina Space-Fire Station#1 39,400 39,400 41,837 43,100 43,100 44,500 44,500 Total 110,600 96,423 98,860 109,200 109,200 104,600 104,600 SALARIES 6110 Regular Employees 467,875 494,675 494,675 513,100 513,100 537,570 537,570 6111 Part time 584,300 590,405 590,405 623,210 623,210 649,610 649,610 6113 Overtime-Regular 6,200 6,200 6,200 5,000 5,000 5,150 5,150 6123 Salaries-Other 40,500 39,955 39,955 38,735 38,735 40,020 40,020 6138 Medicare 13,935 14,300 14,300 17,110 17,110 17,870 17,870 6139 FICA 4,475 4,655 4,655 4,840 4,840 5,125 5,125 6141 Pension-PERA 81,015 85,250 85,250 87,675 87,675 91,640 91,640 6142 Work Comp Insurance 137,155 151,300 151,300 180,840 180,840 192,075 192,075 6144 Long-term Disability Insurance 1,375 1,425 1,425 1,470 1,470 1,540 1,540 6145 Hospital&Life Insurance 82,850 80,845 80,845 85,210 85,210 89,830 89,830 6170 Employee Paid Premiums (11,980) (5,800) (5,800) (5,900) (5,900) (5,900) (5,900) Total 1,407,700 1,463,210 1,463,210 1,551,290 1,551,290 1,624,530 1,624,530 6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES Miscellaneous 225 225 225 225 225 225 225 Total 225 225 225 225 225 225 225 6211 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT Firefighting Hand Tools and Equipment 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 Technical Rescue Equipment 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 Fire Hose(Attack and Supply) 5,405 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 Investigation Equipment 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 Firefighting Nozzles 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 Flashlights 225 225 225 225 225 225 225 EMS Equipment Non-Expendable 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 Fire Extinguishers/Stat-X First Responder Suppressant 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 Rescue Saw Equipment and Blades 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 Mops,Brooms,Cleaning Equipment 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 Station Hand Tools and Equipment 175 175 175 175 175 175 175 Water/Ice Rescue Suit(1 per year x7) 636 636 636 635 635 635 635 SCBA Firefighter Face Mask 253 285 285 285 285 285 285 Disposable Single Gas CO Detectors(4 per year) 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 Technology Upgrades(TVs,Apparatus Display Monitors,etc...) - - - 800 800 800 800 VHF Fire Pagers Replacement(Minitor VI) - - - 500 500 500 500 Gas Monitor Simulator Set - 5,300 5,300 - - Battery powered tools for Rescue 2 - 750 750 - - Battery powered fan for Rescue 2 - 4,900 4,900 - - Battery Powered Scene Lighting 1,100 1,100 Battery Powered Chainsaw 1,425 1,425 Training Manikins,1 adult and 1 youth - - - - - 2,400 2,400 TFT BlitzFire nozzles 9,900 9,900 Blue Card Incident Command equipment update - - - - - 7,550 7,550 Total 27,894 27,671 27,671 12,820 12,820 35,195 35,195 6212 MOTOR FUELS/OILS/ADDITIVES Unleaded 7,193 6,500 6,500 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 Diesel 8,457 12,250 12,250 12,500 12,500 12,500 12,500 Diesel Road Tax 1,070 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Oils&Additives 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Total 18,720 21,750 21,750 22,500 22,500 22,500 22,500 6214 CHEMICALS Plug&Dike 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Hazmat Absorbents(Absorbent/Pillows/Pads) 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 SCBA Cleaning&Disinfectant 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 Class A Foam 1,600 600 600 600 600 600 600 Total 2,350 1,350 1,350 1,350 1,350 1,350 1,350 6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS Batteries(Rechargeable) 1,025 1,025 1,025 1,025 1,025 1,025 1,025 Batteries(Non-Rechargeable) 1,365 1,365 1,365 1,365 1,365 1,365 1,365 SCBA Equipment&Compressors 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 Firefighting Equipment&Tools 300 300 300 300 300 510 510 General/Miscellaneous 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,100 1,100 Apparatus/Vehicle Parts 9,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,400 10,400 Atmospheric Monitor Sensor Replacements 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 Total 13,490 14,490 14,490 14,490 14,490 15,200 15,200 6216 TIRES&BATTERIES(VEHICLES) Tires 2,500 2,500 2,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 Batteries 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 Total 3,200 3,200 3,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES EMS Supplies Expendable 375 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,500 2,500 Traffic Control Devices(Fuses,Cones,etc.) 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 Cleaning Supplies 2,100 2,100 2,100 2,100 2,100 2,100 2,100 Maps&Preplan Materials 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Infection Control Supplies 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Fire Line Barrier Tape 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 Hazmat Decontamination Supplies 660 660 660 660 660 660 660 Atmosheric Monitoring Calibration Gas 1,350 1,350 1,350 1,350 1,350 1,350 1,350 Liquid Smoke(Training Smoke Machine) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Medical Gloves(Latex Free) 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 135 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 23: FIRE-1300 COMPANY 1000: GENERAL FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND 6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES CONT. Vehicle Soap 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 N95 Particulate Respirator Masks 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Station Furnishings 1,2,&3 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Primary Eye Protection 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Salvage Tarps 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 Fire Codes and NFPA Standards 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 Training Materials(Books,Curriculum,Videos) 2,100 2,100 2,100 2,100 2,100 2,100 2,100 Fire Prevention Materials 6,900 7,100 7,100 7,100 7,100 7,100 7,100 Food for Emergency Incidents and Standbys 1,240 1,240 1,240 1,240 1,240 1,240 1,240 Total 24,115 25,940 25,940 25,940 25,940 26,440 26,440 6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES New Hire Physical/Ability/Psychological Assessment($1054) 9,000 9,486 9,486 9,485 9,485 9,485 9,485 Annual Physical Exams(74 @$151.75) 10,582 11,229 11,229 11,750 11,750 11,750 11,750 Behavioral Health Assessments 2,000 2,000 Flu Shots(40 @$40) 1,105 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 Total 22,315 22,315 22,315 22,835 22,835 24,835 24,835 6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS Cellular Phone Services 3,760 3,760 3,760 3,850 3,850 3,850 3,850 Mobile Device Stipends 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 SprintNerizon Mobile EVDO Wireless Services 6,340 4,340 4,340 4,440 4,440 4,440 4,440 Cable Television 310 310 310 310 310 310 310 laR Firefighter Supplemental Notification System 830 830 830 840 840 840 840 Total 13,040 11,040 11,040 11,240 11,240 11,240 11,240 6238 POSTAGE/UPS/FEDEX Miscellaneous Shipping 300 300 750 300 300 300 300 Total 300 300 750 300 300 300 300 6239 PRINTING/PUBLISHING Business Cards 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 Stationery and Envelopes 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 Recruitment Materials(Flyers,Door Knockers,etc.) 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 Total 1,380 1,380 1,380 1,680 1,680 1,680 1,680 6240 CLEAN SERVICE/WASTE REMOVAL Garbage Station 1 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,350 1,350 1,350 1,350 Garbage Station 2 580 600 600 610 610 610 610 Garbage Station 3 580 600 600 610 610 610 610 Total 2,460 2,500 2,500 2,570 2,570 2,570 2,570 6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES Online Interactive Training Services 5,865 5,865 5,865 5,965 5,965 7,840 7,840 Fire RMS(ImageTrend) 3,610 4,100 4,100 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 Lawn Care(Fire Stations x 3) 12,600 12,600 12,600 13,800 13,800 9,600 9,600 Fire Alarm Panel Monitoring(Fire Stations x 3) 1,170 1,210 2,520 2,520 2,520 2,600 2,600 800 MHz Radio Subscriber fees(64@$300) 19,200 19,200 19,200 19,200 19,200 19,200 19,200 USDD Station Alerting fee - - - - - 4,000 4,000 Total 49,235 42,975 44,285 45,685 45,685 47,440 47,440 6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC Station 1 11,480 11,480 11,480 11,500 11,500 11,500 11,500 Station 2 3,414 3,414 3,414 3,424 3,424 3,424 3,424 Station 3 3,406 3,406 3,406 3,426 3,426 3,426 3,426 Total 18,300 18,300 18,300 18,350 18,350 18,350 18,350 6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS Station 1 5,900 6,100 8,100 6,200 6,200 6,200 6,200 Station 2 2,314 2,415 3,415 2,515 2,515 2,515 2,515 Station 3 1,965 2,100 3,100 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 Total 10,179 10,615 14,615 10,915 10,915 10,915 10,915 6257 UTILITIES-OTHER Station 1 1,926 2,026 2,026 2,026 2,026 2,026 2,026 Station 2 770 770 770 770 770 770 770 Station 3 514 614 614 614 614 614 614 Total 3,210 3,410 3,410 3,410 3,410 3,410 3,410 6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 800 MHz Radios and Pager Repair 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 ApparatusNehicle Maintenance and Repairs 16,737 16,737 16,737 16,735 16,735 15,735 15,735 Hydraulic Rescue Tool Maintenance&Coupling Change 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 SCBA Annual Testing and Maintenance 7,100 6,890 6,890 6,890 6,890 6,890 6,890 Boat&Motor Maintenance 175 175 175 175 175 175 175 Annual Apparatus Fire Pump Test(x7) 8,830 8,830 8,830 8,830 8,830 8,830 8,830 Annual Ground and Aerial(x2)Ladder Testing 2,400 2,400 2,400 2,400 2,400 2,400 2,400 Annual Fire Hose Testing 3,800 4,100 4,100 4,100 4,100 4,360 4,360 Turnout Clothing Inspection and Repairs 6,640 6,640 6,640 6,640 6,640 7,380 7,380 Firefighting Equipment Maintenance 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 EMS Equipment Maintenance 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 General Equipment Maintenance 900 900 900 900 900 900 900 Fire Extinguisher Maintenance 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 Total 50,482 50,572 50,572 50,570 50,570 50,570 50,570 136 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 23: FIRE-1300 COMPANY 1000: GENERAL FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND 6266 REPAIRS-BUILDINGS HVAC Maintenance&Repair(Fire Stations x 3) 6,175 6,175 6,175 6,175 6,175 6,175 6,175 Replace Rooftop HVAC Unit Fire Station 1 Overhead Garage Doors General Maintenance 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 General Building Maintenance(+Interior Painting) 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Annual Fire Sprinkler Testing 620 620 620 620 620 620 620 ABLE Fire Training Facility Maintenance 3,500 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 Total 21,895 22,395 22,395 22,395 22,395 22,395 22,395 6275 SCHOOLS/CONF/MEETING EXP-LOCAL Firefighting Courses and Continuing Education 4,030 4,030 4,030 4,030 4,030 4,030 4,030 Fire Service Certifications 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 EMS Training 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 Department Assistant Continuing Education 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 Fire Marshall/Inspector Continuing Education 1,520 1,520 1,520 1,520 1,520 1,520 1,520 Technical Rescue Training 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 Blue Card Command CE and Certification 3,800 3,800 3,800 3,800 3,800 3,800 3,800 Hazardous Materials Training 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Emergency Response Driving Course 3,250 3,250 3,250 3,250 3,250 3,250 3,250 Refreshments/Meals 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 Total 20,500 20,500 20,500 20,500 20,500 20,500 20,500 6276 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES EXP-OTHER MN State Fire Chiefs Conference 3,300 4,300 4,300 4,300 4,300 4,800 4,800 Fire Department Instructors Conference(FDIC) 8,970 8,970 8,970 8,970 8,970 9,300 9,300 Fire Rescue International Conference(FRI) 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 Regional Fire Schools 2,400 1,400 1,400 2,400 2,400 3,100 3,100 Total 18,870 18,870 18,870 19,870 19,870 21,400 21,400 6278 SUBSISTENCE ALLOWANCE Subsistence allowance for out-of-metro area trips 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 Total 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 6280 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS Dues 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,700 1,700 1,700 1,700 Subscriptions(NFPA Standards and Trade Magazines) 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 Total 3,100 3,100 3,100 3,300 3,300 3,300 3,300 6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE Fire Fighting Boots 4,550 4,650 4,650 4,650 4,650 4,650 4,650 Fire Fighting/Extrication/Rescue Gloves 3,080 3,160 3,160 3,160 3,160 3,700 3,700 Fire Fighting Coats 18,600 18,650 18,650 18,650 18,650 21,650 21,650 Fire Fighting Pants 13,800 13,850 13,850 13,850 13,850 16,650 16,650 Fire Fighting Helmets 3,735 3,825 3,825 25,455 455 500 500 Fire Fighting Protective Hoods(Nomex Barrier) 4,004 4,104 4,104 4,105 4,105 4,300 4,300 Volunteer/Paid-on-Call Uniforms(74 @$125) 9,250 9,550 9,550 9,550 9,550 9,550 9,550 T-Shirts,Explorers 130 130 130 130 130 130 130 Badges/Awards/Plaques/Commendation Medals 3,300 3,300 3,300 3,300 3,300 3,500 3,500 Regular(Full-Time)Uniforms(4 @$925) 3,700 3,900 3,900 3,900 3,900 3,900 3,900 Reduce to trend - - - - (4,000) - (4,000) Total 64,149 65,119 65,119 86,750 57,750 68,530 64,530 6310 RENTAL EXPENSE Home and Garden Show 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 Total 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 6399 OTHER CHARGES Annual Service Awards Banquet 3,050 3,200 3,200 3,300 3,300 3,300 3,300 Total 3,050 3,200 3,200 3,300 3,300 3,300 3,300 6745 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT VERF-Vehicle Replacement Fund Charges 407,800 418,000 418,000 428,450 428,450 439,160 439,160 Total 407,800 418,000 418,000 428,450 428,450 439,160 439,160 Total Net of Personnel 803,359 812,317 818,077 836,745 807,745 858,105 854,105 TOTAL EXPENSES $ 2,211,059 $ 2,275,527 $ 2,281,287 $ 2,388,035 $ 2,359,035 $ 2,482,635 $ 2,478,635 137 COMPANY DEPARTMENT BUSINESS UNIT ACTIVITY 1000 76 1365 Fire Relief DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY This business unit accounts for the activity associated with contributions to the Apple Valley Firefighter's Relief Association. The Apple Valley Firefighter's Relief Association is a separate legal entity that receives and manages monies to provide retirement and other benefits to its members (Volunteer/Paid-On-Call Firefighters) and beneficiaries (Retired Volunteer/Paid-On-Call Firefighters). There are two major sources of revenue in the fund; the first is a pass through whereby Minnesota State Fire Aid is received from the State which then, by statute, is to go to the Firefighters Relief Association; the second is a property tax levy that the City of Apple Valley levies each year to support the Firefighters Relief Association. MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2023 and 2024 The Relief Association Special Fund actuarial valuation study completed in April of 2022 shows an increase in the funding ratio from 134.6% in 2021 to 143.3% in 2022. For 2023, the required municipal contribution as defined by the actuarial is $0. In response to changes to the calculation of state aid for Fire Reliefs at the state level, the formula for the city's additional contribution was amended to be 90% of the total aid received two years prior, for example the 2023 request is 90% of the actual received in 2021. The City will also receive a pass through contribution in the form of State Fire Aid estimated to $348,000 and $353,000 in 2023 and 2024 respectively. Summary Budget Department 76 Fire Relief 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Revenue: 4130 State Fire Aid-pass through $ 307,652 $ 328,195 $ 343,326 $ 295,000 $ 330,000 $ 348,000 $ 353,000 4130 Supplemental Aid-Pass Thru 4,000 2,000 4,000 - - 3,000 3,000 Total Revenue 311,652 330,195 347,326 295,000 330,000 351,000 356,000 Expenditures: Contractual Services 750 517 750 1,000 1,000 750 750 State Fire Aid-pass through 307,652 328,195 343,326 295,000 330,000 348,000 353,000 Supplemental Aid-Pass Thru 4,000 2,000 4,000 3,000 3,000 City Contribution to Fire Relief 255,223 256,500 276,887 276,887 295,375 308,995 311,000 Total Expenditures 567,625 587,212 624,963 572,887 626,375 660,745 667,750 Net addition to(use of)general (255,973) (257,017) (277,637) (277,887) (296,375) (309,745) (311,750) revenues 2023 CAPITAL OUTLAY: None 2024 CAPITAL OUTLAY: None City of Apple Valley 138 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) FIRE RELIEF 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6125-EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 6100-TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 6235-CONSULTANT SERVICES 750 517 750 1,000 1,000 650 1,000 750 1,000 750 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 750 517 750 1,000 1,000 650 1,000 750 1,000 750 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 750 517 750 1,000 1,000 650 1,000 750 1,000 750 6319-REIMBURSEMENT OF REV COLL FOR 566,875 586,695 624,213 571,887 625,375 0 656,995 659,995 664,000 667,000 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES 566,875 586,695 624,213 571,887 625,375 0 656,995 659,995 664,000 667,000 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES 566,875 586,695 624,213 571,887 625,375 0 656,995 659,995 664,000 667,000 567,625 587,212 624,963 572,887 626,375 650 657,995 660,745 665,000 667,750 139 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 76: FIRE RELIEF-1365 COMPANY 1000: GENERAL FUNC JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND REVENUE 4130 State Fire Aid-Pass Through 295,000 330,000 345,556 348,000 348,000 353,000 353,000 4130 Supplemental Aid-Pass Through - - 3,000 - 3,000 - 3,000 Total 295,000 330,000 348,556 348,000 351,000 353,000 356,000 6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES City Share of GASB 67/68 Actuaria 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 750 1,000 750 Total 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 750 1,000 750 6319 CONTRIBUTION TO FIRE RELIEF ASSOCIATION State Fire Aid Pass Through 295,000 330,000 345,556 348,000 348,000 353,000 353,000 Supplemental Aid-Pass Through - 0 3,000 - 3,000 - 3,000 City Contribution to Fire Relief Associatior 276,887 295,375 295,375 308,995 308,995 311,000 311,000 Total 571,887 625,375 643,931 656,995 659,995 664,000 667,000 Total Net of Personnel 572,887 626,375 644,931 657,995 660,745 665,000 667,750 TOTAL EXPENSES $ 572,887 626,375 $ 644,931 657,995 660,745 $ 665,000 $ 667,750 140 ••• •••• ••••• ••• AppValley Notes: 141 COMPANY DEPARTMENT BUSINESS UNIT ACTIVITY 1000 29 1500 Public Works Administration/ Natural Resources DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY The Public Works Administration Division coordinates activities for functions within the Public Works Department, consisting of: Engineering; Building Inspections; Street Maintenance; Snow and Ice Control; Traffic Management; Fleet and Buildings; Water; Sanitary Sewer; Storm Drainage; Street Light Utilities; Natural Resources; and the Lebanon Cemetery. Natural Resources staff within the Administration Division implements policies and ordinances related to forestry management and surface water quality of lakes, ponds and wetlands. SERVICE CATEGORIES The Administration Division of the Public Works Department provides budgetary and overall management for the divisions/business units associated with the department. The following internal and external services are provided by the Public Works Administration and Natural Resources Division. 1. Department Operating Budget Administration Services: • Prepare and assemble annual operating budget for the Public Works Department • Monitor budget performance of Public Works Divisions on a monthly basis • Review requisitions for purchases by Public Works Divisions 2. Department Management Services: • Conduct weekly staff meetings to coordinate work within the department • Coordinate Public Works legal issues with City Attorney's Office and LMCIT • Administer, manage and develop asset management software program • Manage work orders and citizen requests for services • Coordinate Public Works services with Emergency Management Director in response to severe weather, flooding and other natural disasters 3. Capital Improvement Program Planning Services: • Prepare annual updates to the Capital Improvement Program for City Infrastructure • Establish and adjust project priorities and schedules • Provide long-term planning and management of available funds for capital projects • Coordinate implementation of the Capital Improvement Program 4. Agency Coordination: • Coordinate with Dakota County on planned improvements to County Highways • Facilitate inter-community coordination issues with adjacent communities 5. Forestry Management Services: • Proactive planning and management of boulevard trees, removal and replacement coordination for Emerald Ash Borer devastation • Administer diseased tree program for control of tree diseases • Identify and coordinate removal of diseased and hazardous trees • Provide technical assistance to residents seeking advice on tree issues 142 MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2023 In addition to recurring annual duties, the following major objectives are established for 2023 within this business unit. • Continue proactive Emerald Ash Borer Management Plan since 2015 infestation. • Provide assistance with boulevard tree removal and replacement as it relates to street improvement projects. • Develop higher level infrastructure analysis using advanced asset management and GIS capabilities to forecast future asset conditions, current investment levels, and financial needs. MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2024 In addition to recurring annual duties, the following major objectives are established for 2024 within this business unit. • Continue use of asset management system for better forecasting and budgeting within the Public Works Department. • Provide assistance with boulevard tree removal and replacement as it relates to street improvement projects. • Provide additional Emerald Ash Borer Management. IMPACT MEASURES / PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual Actual Actual Projected Projected Projected Item 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Annual Street & Utility Capital Improvements (excluding developments) 13.8 12.0 12.1 8.5 10.5 8.5 ($ in millions) Disease Tree Removals 419 488 742 800 850 1000 Public Trees 224 148 404 300 400 400 Private Trees 343 340 338 500 525 600 Number of Work 14,888* 15,830 15,154 16,000 16,000 16,000 Orders/Tasks Nat Resource Mgt Permits 48 44 44 55 55 55 *The large increase in tracked work orders coincides with the implementation of the new asset management system-OMS. Regular Status Personnel Schedule— FTE's Adopted Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Position Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Public Works Director 1 1 1 1 1 1 Public Works Coordinator 1 1 1 1 1 1 Natural Resources Coord. 1 1 1 1 1 1 Natural Resources Tech 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 I (FT Position split with 5505) Clerical Assistant 0 0 0 0 0 0 Temporary Status Personnel Schedule- Hours Adopted Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Position Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Tree Inspector 646 1292 1050 1050 1050 1050 Administrative Intern 646 646 300 300 0 0 143 Summary Budget Department 29, Business Unit 1500 Administration/Natural Resources 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 _ Actual Actual Actual Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Revenue: 4217-Natural Resources lnsp $ 11,172 $ 9,127 $ 14,540 $ 15,800 $ 15,800 $ 15,800 $ 15,800 4150-Grants DNR EAB - - - - - 138,000 - Expenditures: Salaries&Wages 361,616 363,457 390,671 402,915 406,215 417,190 434,005 Employee Benefits 103,061 104,706 111,782 117,340 116,285 127,200 133,495 Supplies 4,241 2,419 2,717 8,040 6,900 9,430 9,140 Contractual Services 158,404 78,147 213,061 227,530 202,080 438,960 290,965 Repairs&Maint.enance 3,108 3,517 4,060 3,050 3,100 3,100 3,100 Training/Travel/Dues 11,269 6,382 8,324 11,715 11,930 11,585 12,550 Other Expenses 3,251 3,690 3,214 3,725 3,725 3,750 3,775 Vehicle Replacement Fund 4,500 2,000 2,050 2,050 2,100 2,150 2,200 Capital Outlay 3,987 - - - - - - Total Exp 653,437 564,318 735,879 776,365 752,335 1,013,365 889,230 Net addition to(use of) general revenues (642,265) (555,191) (721,339) (760,565) (736,535) (859,565) (873,430) 2023 Capital Outlay: None 2024 Capital Outlay: None City of Apple Valley 144 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN/NATURAL RES 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6110-SALARY-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 352,825 352,161 370,729 357,040 369,695 163,069 382,505 382,505 398,195 398,195 6112-SALARY-SEASONAL TEMP 6,518 8,544 17,380 25,500 23,100 0 21,000 21,000 22,050 22,050 6113-OVERTIME-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 487 118 607 8,600 2,000 0 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6121-INSURANCE CASH BENEFIT 2,760 2,880 2,760 1,140 6122-COMP REQUEST -974 -246 -805 0 6123-SALARY-OTHER 11,775 11,420 12,685 12,685 12,760 12,760 6105-SALARIES AND WAGES 361,616 363,457 390,671 402,915 406,215 164,209 417,190 417,190 434,005 434,005 6138-MEDICARE 5,205 5,236 5,597 5,840 5,890 2,360 6,050 6,050 6,295 6,295 6139-FICA 21,832 21,818 23,552 24,215 24,185 10,091 24,835 24,835 25,570 25,570 6141-PENSIONS-PERA 24,887 26,402 27,790 28,305 28,735 12,153 29,715 29,715 30,900 30,900 6142-WORKERS COMPENSATION 6,494 1,977 3,048 2,335 2,380 1,265 3,425 3,425 3,735 3,735 6144-LONG-TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE 718 766 669 1,110 1,050 237 1,085 1,085 1,130 1,130 6145-MEDICAL INSURANCE 38,892 44,843 49,649 55,535 54,045 13,623 62,090 62,090 65,865 65,865 6146-DENTAL INSURANCE 3,961 3,380 3,370 1,290 6147-LIFE INSURANCE-BASIC 23 24 26 29 6148-LIFE INSURANCE-SUPP/DEPEND 1,040 260 273 110 6170-EMPLOYEE PAID PREMIUMS 9 0 -2,193 0 6125-EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 103,061 104,706 111,782 117,340 116,285 41,157 127,200 127,200 133,495 133,495 6100-TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 464,677 468,163 502,453 520,255 522,500 205,367 544,390 544,390 567,500 567,500 6210-OFFICE SUPPLIES 1,661 1,029 1,037 1,930 1,955 713 1,830 1,830 2,030 2,030 6211-SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT 786 288 91 1,850 1,500 110 2,050 2,050 1,500 1,500 6212-MOTOR FUELS/OILS 980 755 603 1,575 1,000 202 2,060 2,060 1,700 1,700 6215-EQUIPMENT-PARTS 380 501 299 450 475 956 500 500 500 500 6216-VEHICLES-TIRES/BATTERIES 438 491 0 300 300 0 300 300 300 300 6229-GENERAL SUPPLIES -4 -644 687 1,935 1,670 1,424 2,690 2,690 3,110 3,110 6205-SUPPLIES 4,241 2,419 2,717 8,040 6,900 3,406 9,430 9,430 9,140 9,140 6235-CONSULTANT SERVICES 21 21 21 30 30 0 35 35 40 40 6237-TELEPHONE/PAGERS 1,430 1,087 1,054 1,100 1,200 490 0 0 0 0 6238-POSTAGE/UPS/FEDEX 0 0 0 250 250 0 100 100 100 100 6239-PRINTING 473 42 252 850 600 157 500 500 500 500 6240-CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE 0 449 230 82 6249-OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 156,480 76,548 211,504 225,300 200,000 58,892 438,325 438,325 290,325 290,325 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 158,404 78,147 213,061 227,530 202,080 59,621 438,960 438,960 290,965 290,965 6250-UTILITIES 6265-REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 3,108 3,517 4,060 3,050 3,100 1,234 3,100 3,100 3,100 3,100 6260-REPAIRS AND MAINTENA 3,108 3,517 4,060 3,050 3,100 1,234 3,100 3,100 3,100 3,100 6275-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL 1,747 455 358 2,100 1,750 249 1,650 1,650 2,150 2,150 6276-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP OTHER 2,165 0 1,551 2,500 2,600 1,195 2,400 2,400 2,600 2,600 6277-MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE 255 52 170 500 500 0 350 350 350 350 6278-SUBSISTENCE ALLOWANCE 250 0 250 250 250 0 250 250 250 250 6280-DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 5,995 5,346 5,617 5,365 5,730 5,596 6,035 6,035 6,300 6,300 6281-UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 858 529 379 1,000 1,100 87 1,100 900 1,100 900 6270-TRNG/TRAVL/DUES/UNIF 11,269 6,382 8,324 11,715 11,930 7,127 11,785 11,585 12,750 12,550 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 177,022 90,465 228,162 250,335 224,010 71,387 463,275 463,075 315,955 315,755 6310-RENTAL EXPENSE 3,179 3,179 2,960 3,425 3,425 1,485 3,450 3,450 3,450 3,450 6333-GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS 0 0 -2 0 6349-LATE FEES/FINANCE CHARGES 12 0 0 0 6399-OTHER CHARGES 60 511 256 300 300 0 300 300 325 325 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES 3,251 3,690 3,214 3,725 3,725 1,485 3,750 3,750 3,775 3,775 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES 3,251 3,690 3,214 3,725 3,725 1,485 3,750 3,750 3,775 3,775 City of Apple Valley 145 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN/NATURAL RES 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6725-CAPITAL OUTLAY-OFFICE EQUIP 8,487 0 0 0 0 0 6745-VERF CHARGES 4,500 2,000 2,050 2,050 2,100 875 2,150 2,150 2,200 2,200 6701-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 12,987 2,000 2,050 2,050 2,100 875 2,150 2,150 2,200 2,200 6700-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 12,987 2,000 2,050 2,050 2,100 875 2,150 2,150 2,200 2,200 657,937 564,318 735,878 776,365 752,335 279,114 1,013,565 1,013,365 889,430 889,230 146 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 29: PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION/NATURAL RESOURCES-1500 COMPANY 1000: GENERAL FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND REVENUE 4217 Natural Resources Inspections 15,800 15,800 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 4150 Grants(DNR EAB Forestry) 138,000 138,000 Total 15,800 15,800 10,000 148,000 148,000 10,000 10,000 SALARIES 6110 Regular Employees 357,040 369,695 369,695 382,505 382,505 398,195 398,195 6112 Salary-Seasonal Temp(Tree Inspector) 21,000 18,500 18,500 21,000 21,000 22,050 22,050 6112 Seasonal Temp(Admin) 4,500 4,600 4,600 - - - - 6113 Overtime-Reg 8,600 2,000 2,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6123 Salaries-Other 11,775 11,420 11,420 12,685 12,685 12,760 12,760 6138 Medicare 5,840 5,890 5,890 6,050 6,050 6,295 6,295 6139 FICA 24,215 24,185 24,185 24,835 24,835 25,570 25,570 6141 Pension-PERA 28,305 28,735 28,735 29,715 29,715 30,900 30,900 6142 Work Comp Insurance 2,335 2,380 2,380 3,425 3,425 3,735 3,735 6144 Long-Term Disability Insurance 1,110 1,050 1,050 1,085 1,085 1,130 1,130 6145 Hospital&Life Insurance 55,535 54,045 54,045 62,090 62,090 65,865 65,865 6170 Employee Paid Premiums - - - Total 520,255 522,500 522,500 544,390 544,390 567,500 567,500 6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES General Supplies(PW Admin) 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,000 1,000 1,200 1,200 General Supplies(Natural Resources) 300 325 325 400 400 400 400 Printer/Copier Supplies 430 430 430 430 430 430 Total 1,930 1,955 1,525 1,830 1,830 2,030 2,030 6211 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT Tools-Tree Inspection 500 500 250 450 450 400 400 Additional Monitor for 1 PC - - Replacement iPad 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 Buckthorn Pullers(2) 350 - 500 500 - - Total 1,850 1,500 1,250 2,050 2,050 1,500 1,500 6212 MOTOR FUELS/OILS/ADDITIVES Nolead Fuel (-800 gal.) 1,400 850 1,460 1,785 1,785 1,500 1,500 Oil/Lub 175 150 250 275 275 200 200 Total 1,575 1,000 1,710 2,060 2,060 1,700 1,700 6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS Vehicle 601 450 475 475 500 500 500 500 Total 450 475 475 500 500 500 500 6216 EQUIPMENT-TIRES/BATTERIES Vehicle 601 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 Total 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES Manuals 200 300 300 300 300 300 300 Meeting Supplies 500 600 500 600 600 500 500 Paint(Paint for Marking Tree Disease) 500 500 400 500 500 500 500 Personal Protective Equip-Safety 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 Tree Sale 11,000 11,500 12,000 12,500 12,500 13,000 13,000 Less offsetting revenue from tree sale (11,000) (11,500) (12,000) (12,500) (12,500) (13,000) (13,000) Large Format Plotter(Inks,Head) 500 500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 Wooden Stakes 35 70 70 90 90 110 110 Reduction - (500) (500) (500) Total 1,935 1,670 2,970 2,690 2,690 3,110 3,110 6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES Hearing Consultant 30 30 30 35 35 40 40 Total 30 30 30 35 35 40 40 6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS Mobile Phones&Service 1,100 1,200 Total 1,100 1,200 - - - - - 6238 POSTAGE/UPS/FEDEX Postage 250 250 50 100 100 100 100 Total 250 250 50 100 100 100 100 6239 PRINTING/PUBLISHING Business Cards,PW Poster,Forms 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 Brochures and Forms 550 300 300 200 200 200 200 Total 850 600 600 500 500 500 500 6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES Shade Tree Management Strategies 225,000 200,000 250,000 438,000 438,000 290,000 290,000 800 Mhz Fees 300 300 300 325 325 325 325 Total 225,300 200,300 250,300 438,325 438,325 290,325 290,325 6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT Copier Maintenance-Main Print Ct,Maint. Envelope Printer&Utilities Printer 2,900 2,900 2,900 2,900 2,900 2,900 2,900 Large Format Plotter 150 200 200 200 200 200 200 Total 3,050 3,100 3,100 3,100 3,100 3,100 3,100 147 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 29: PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION/NATURAL RESOURCES-1500 COMPANY 1000: GENERAL FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND 6275 SCHOOL/CONF/EXP-LOCAL Seminars/Mtgs(CONDAC,PW Mtgs) 450 500 500 500 500 400 400 Shade Tree Short Course 800 800 200 600 600 800 800 Forestry Management Workshop(x2) 300 300 100 200 200 200 200 Natural Resources Seminar 250 250 100 250 250 250 250 MPWA Fall Conference-Metro - - - - - - Admin Training(Municipals,Staff Dev) 300 300 300 500 500 500 500 Reduction - (400) (400) (400) Total 2,100 1,750 1,200 1,650 1,650 2,150 2,150 6276 SCHOOL/CONF/EXP-OTHER APWA PWX Conference 2,500 2,600 2,365 2,400 2,400 2,600 2,600 Total 2,500 2,600 2,365 2,400 2,400 2,600 2,600 6277 MILEAGE ALLOWANCE Mileage 500 500 300 350 350 350 350 Total 500 500 300 350 350 350 350 6278 SUBSISTENCE ALLOWANCE Out of Town-Training 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 Total 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 6280 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS Prof Dues(APWA) 250 450 462 460 460 470 470 Prof Dues(Soc of Arbor,ADF,Pesticide) 375 400 350 450 450 450 450 Cartegraph On-line Licenses 4,740 4,880 4,880 5,125 5,125 5,380 5,380 Total 5,365 5,730 5,692 6,035 6,035 6,300 6,300 6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE Clothing Natural Resources 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 800 1,000 800 Clothing Public Works - 100 100 100 100 100 100 Total 1,000 1,100 1,100 1,100 900 1,100 900 6310 RENTAL EXPENSE *Home&Garden Expo Booth(Split with Storm) 325 325 275 350 350 350 350 Copier Lease 3,100 3,100 3,100 3,100 3,100 3,100 3,100 Total 3,425 3,425 3,375 3,450 3,450 3,450 3,450 6399 OTHER CHARGES Nursery Sale Permit(Tree Sale) 300 300 300 300 300 325 325 Total 300 300 300 300 300 325 325 6725 CAPITAL OUTLAY-OFFICE EQUIP Total - - - - - - - 6745 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT VERF-Vehicle Repl.Charges 2,050 2,100 2,100 2,150 2,150 2,200 2,200 Total 2,050 2,100 2,100 2,150 2,150 2,200 2,200 Total Net of Personnel 256,110 230,135 278,992 469,175 468,975 321,930 321,730 TOTAL EXPENSES 776,365 752,635 801,492 1,013,565 1,013,365 889,430 889,230 148 ••• •••• ••••• ••• AppValley Notes: 149 COMPANY DEPARTMENT BUSINESS UNIT ACTIVITY 1000 27 1510 Public Works ENGINEERING DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY The Public Works Engineering Division provides engineering design and plan review services for street and utility infrastructure projects and land development projects. Engineering Division staff also responds to inquiries and questions from the City Council, various City departments, land developers, businesses and residents. SERVICE CATEGORIES The Engineering Division provides the following internal and external services related to engineering functions for the City of Apple Valley. 1. Engineering Design and Construction Contracting Services ■ Prepare engineering plans and specifications for public infrastructure projects ■ Conduct public bidding process for projects in accordance with State Statutes ■ Provide contract administration for projects through completion of construction 2. Construction Inspections and Surveying Services ■ Provide field surveys to assist in preparation of construction plans • Provide construction field survey staking for projects • Conduct field inspections and coordination of construction activities 3. Traffic and Transportation Engineering Services ■ Determine traffic forecasts for the City street system to assist with design work • Study existing street segments and intersections based on various traffic concerns ■ Review proposed development plans for traffic generation and traffic flow 4. Development and Site Plan Review Services ■ Review proposed development plans for compliance with City engineering standards ■ Attend meetings with architects, engineers and land developers to discuss infrastructure coordination for land development projects ■ Determine need and availability of public utility services for proposed development ■ Conduct site inspections during construction for compliance with approved plans 5. Technical Assistance and Right-of-Way Management ■ Administer City's right-of-way management ordinance and permit process ■ Assist residents, businesses, staff and Council regarding infrastructure issues ■ Address drainage and flood control issues 150 MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2023 In addition to recurring annual duties, the following primary projects are scheduled for design and construction over the next year using technical resources within the Public Works Engineering Division business unit. Project Anticipated Contract Title Award Timeline 2023 Street& Utility Improvements Spring 2023 • Walnut Lane/Juniper Lane 2023 Feasibility Study—Apple Valley Additions Spring 2023 2023 Micro surfacing Project Summer 2023 2023 Crack sealing Project Summer 2023 2023 Street Improvements (State Aid) Spring 2023 • Hayes Road (140th to 150th) • 157th Street W (Cedar to Galaxie) 2023 Street Improvements Summer 2023 • 142nd Street (Cedar to Galaxie) 2023 Intersection Improvements Summer 2023 • 147th St W Roundabout (Cedar to Glazier) 2023 Utility Improvements Summer 2023 2023 Ring Route Boulevard Streetscape Improvements Summer 2023 2023 Miscellaneous Intersection &ADA Improvements Summer 2023 MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2024 In addition to recurring annual duties, the following primary projects are scheduled for design and construction over the next year using technical resources within the Public Works Engineering Division business unit. Anticipated Project Contract Title Award Timeline 2024 Street& Utility Improvements Spring 2024 • Greenleaf 4th Addition (lower 134th Fernando Ave, Fernando Ct., Ferris) 2024 Micro surfacing Project Summer 2024 2024 Crack sealing Project Summer 2024 2024 Street Improvements (State Aid) • 153rd Street(Central Village) • 127th Street(Galaxie to Cedar) 2024 Street Improvements Spring 2024 • Whitney Drive (Garden View to Redwood) 151 • Central Village (152nd, Fortino, Founders, Fresco, Gabella, Gallivant) 2024 Utility Improvements Summer 2024 2024 Miscellaneous Intersection &ADA Improvements Summer 2024 2024 Ring Route Boulevard Streetscape Improvements Summer 2024 2024 City Hall East Parking Lot Improvements Summer 2024 IMPACT MEASURES / PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual Actual Actual Projected Projected Projected Rem 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total Contract Value $13.8M $16.5M $16.1M $17.5M $10.5M $10.0M of Projects Delivered Number of Right-of- 92 121 140 100 100 100 Way Permits Regular Status Personnel Schedule— FTE's Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Proposed Position Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 City Engineer 1 1 1 1 1 1 Assistant City Engineer 0 0 0 0 1 1 Civil Engineer 1 1 1 .65 .65 .65 Engineering Tech III 1 1 1 1 1 1 Eng/Construction Tech I & II 2 2 2 2 2 2 GIS Tech 0.25 0.25 0.25 0 0 0 FT position split with 5305,5365,5505 GIS Coordinator 0 0 0 0.25 0.25 0.25 Administrative Specialist 0.50 0.50 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 FT position split with 1400 Temporary Status Personnel Schedule - Hours Adopted Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Position Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Engineering Intern 1100 1300 1300 1300 1300 1300 GIS Intern 480 480 152 Summary Budget Business Unit 1510 Engineering 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Revenue 4219 Engineering Fees 646,561 803,858 737,867 850,000 870,000 974,000 1,003,000 4076 Permit Fees-Small Cell 1,050 - 350 7,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 4074 Permit Fees-ROW 29,190 80,654 70,872 7,500 12,500 50,000 50,000 676,801 884,511 809,089 865,000 885,000 1,026,500 1,055,500 Expenditures Salaries&Wages 491,847 527,597 546,644 595,965 584,100 767,965 794,945 Employee Benefits 150,181 166,495 175,848 201,010 194,110 205,965 216,295 Supplies 15,638 17,493 13,972 15,350 15,100 20,990 18,450 Contractual Services 74,312 65,336 69,599 87,900 98,750 116,000 98,650 Training/Travel/Dues 16,099 34,802 48,177 61,020 64,940 64,860 68,520 Vehicle Replacement Fund 10,250 10,510 10,770 10,770 11,040 11,320 11,600 Capital Outlay - - - - - - Total Exp 758,327 822,232 865,009 972,015 968,040 1,187,100 1,208,460 Net addition to(use of)general (81,526) 62,279 (55,920) (107,015) (83,040) (160,600) (152,960) revenues 2023 Capital Outlay: None 2024 Capital Outlay: None City of Apple Valley 153 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) PW ENGINEERING 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6110-SALARY-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 453,063 487,162 519,119 516,565 514,715 244,478 692,775 692,775 722,085 722,085 6112-SALARY-SEASONAL TEMP 15,098 9,566 14,795 16,000 16,400 5,106 20,020 20,020 18,600 18,600 6113-OVERTIME-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 20,993 29,140 16,056 40,000 30,000 7,083 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 6121-INSURANCE CASH BENEFIT 1,020 1,320 1,560 720 6122-COMP REQUEST -1,381 -311 -6,453 -1,689 6123-SALARY-OTHER 18,400 18,985 21,170 21,170 20,260 20,260 6124-OVERTIME-SEASONAL TEMP 3,054 720 1,566 5,000 4,000 399 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 6105-SALARIES AND WAGES 491,847 527,597 546,644 595,965 584,100 256,096 767,965 767,965 794,945 794,945 6138-MEDICARE 6,860 7,307 7,437 8,640 8,425 3,478 8,815 8,815 9,135 9,135 6139-FICA 29,331 31,223 31,799 36,950 36,025 14,871 37,695 37,695 38,960 38,960 6141-PENSIONS-PERA 35,452 38,506 39,299 43,500 42,050 18,740 44,100 44,100 45,850 45,850 6142-WORKERS COMPENSATION 2,453 2,756 3,109 3,390 3,355 1,854 5,105 5,105 5,550 5,550 6144-LONG-TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE 938 1,045 966 1,640 1,460 399 1,525 1,525 1,590 1,590 6145-MEDICAL INSURANCE 87,113 102,796 117,459 115,090 112,295 45,273 118,425 118,425 124,910 124,910 6146-DENTAL INSURANCE 6,084 6,445 6,792 3,410 6147-LIFE INSURANCE-BASIC 32 35 41 56 6148-LIFE INSURANCE-SUPP/DEPEND 311 292 535 140 6170-EMPLOYEE PAID PREMIUMS -18,392 -23,912 -31,590 -8,200 -9,500 -5,213 -9,700 -9,700 -9,700 -9,700 6125-EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 150,181 166,495 175,848 201,010 194,110 83,010 205,965 205,965 216,295 216,295 6100-TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 642,027 694,092 722,492 796,975 778,210 339,106 973,930 973,930 1,011,240 1,011,240 6210-OFFICE SUPPLIES 392 348 1,144 750 600 31 600 600 600 600 6211-SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT 11,099 13,991 9,366 9,050 9,200 14,752 11,100 14,025 11,250 11,675 6212-MOTOR FUELS/OILS 3,031 1,995 2,253 3,050 3,100 973 4,515 4,515 4,325 4,325 6215-EQUIPMENT-PARTS 147 429 303 600 750 94 750 500 750 500 6216-VEHICLES-TIRES/BATTERIES 652 669 776 700 750 0 750 750 750 750 6229-GENERAL SUPPLIES 318 61 130 1,200 700 80 800 600 600 600 6205-SUPPLIES 15,638 17,493 13,972 15,350 15,100 15,931 18,515 20,990 18,275 18,450 6235-CONSULTANT SERVICES 61,766 55,037 57,170 77,500 87,500 8,650 104,000 104,000 87,000 87,000 6237-TELEPHONE/PAGERS 5,288 5,422 4,850 5,350 4,850 2,631 5,450 5,450 5,600 5,600 6239-PRINTING 2,378 2,224 2,423 3,050 3,150 2,449 3,300 3,300 2,800 2,800 6240-CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE 521 229 254 250 166 250 250 250 250 6244-ROW EPERMIT FEES 1,952 2,423 4,902 2,000 3,000 308 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 6249-OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,393 0 0 0 0 41 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 74,297 65,336 69,599 87,900 98,750 14,246 116,000 116,000 98,650 98,650 6265-REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6260-REPAIRS AND MAINTENA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6275-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL 2,259 1,955 2,820 10,550 8,600 945 9,700 9,700 8,700 8,700 6276-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP OTHER 4,472 -1,164 0 2,700 2,700 0 0 0 3,500 3,500 6277-MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE 0 0 0 200 200 0 200 200 200 200 6278-SUBSISTENCE ALLOWANCE 275 0 0 0 6280-DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 8,005 33,009 44,068 46,470 51,940 9,808 53,410 53,410 54,520 54,520 6281-UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 1,088 1,002 1,289 1,100 1,500 313 1,550 1,550 1,600 1,600 6270-TRNG/TRAVL/DUES/UNIF 16,099 34,802 48,177 61,020 64,940 11,066 64,860 64,860 68,520 68,520 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 106,035 117,630 131,748 164,270 178,790 41,242 199,375 201,850 185,445 185,620 6333-GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS 0 0 0 0 6399-OTHER CHARGES 15 0 0 0 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES 15 0 0 0 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES 15 0 0 0 6745-VERF CHARGES 10,250 10,510 10,770 10,770 11,040 4,600 11,320 11,320 11,600 11,600 6701-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 10,250 10,510 10,770 10,770 11,040 4,600 11,320 11,320 11,600 11,600 City of Apple Valley 154 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) PW ENGINEERING 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6700-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 10,250 10,510 10,770 10,770 11,040 4,600 11,320 11,320 11,600 11,600 758,327 822,232 865,010 972,015 968,040 384,949 1,184,625 1,187,100 1,208,285 1,208,460 155 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 27: PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING-1510 COMPANY 1000: GENERAL FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND REVENUE 4074 Permit Fees-ROW 12,500 12,500 30,000 12,500 50,000 12,500 50,000 4076 Small Cell Permits 7,500 2,500 1,000 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 4219 Engineering Charges 850,000 870,000 870,000 870,000 974,000 890,000 1,003,000 Total 870,000 885,000 901,000 885,000 1,026,500 905,000 1,055,500 SALARIES 6110 Regular Employees 516,565 514,715 532,715 532,775 532,775 557,085 557,085 6112 Salary-Seasonal Temp 16,000 16,400 16,400 20,020 20,020 18,600 18,600 6113 Overtime-Reg 40,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 6123 Salaries-Other 18,400 18,985 21,170 21,170 20,260 20,260 6124 Overtime-Seasonal Temp 5,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 6138 Medicare 8,640 8,425 8,425 8,815 8,815 9,135 9,135 6139 FICA 36,950 36,025 36,025 37,695 37,695 38,960 38,960 6141 Pension-PERA 43,500 42,050 42,050 44,100 44,100 45,850 45,850 6142 Work Comp Insurance 3,390 3,355 3,355 5,105 5,105 5,550 5,550 6144 Long-term Disability Insurance 1,640 1,460 1,460 1,525 1,525 1,590 1,590 6145 Hospital&Life Insurance 115,090 112,295 112,295 118,425 118,425 124,910 124,910 6170 Employee Paid Premiums (8,200) (9,500) (9,500) (9,700) (9,700) (9,700) (9,700) Position Changes(Assistant City Engineer) 160,000 160,000 165,000 165,000 Total 796,975 778,210 777,225 973,930 973,930 1,011,240 1,011,240 6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES General Supplies 750 600 400 600 600 600 600 Total 750 600 400 600 600 600 600 6211 SMALL TOOL&EQUIPMENT AutoCad&Eng Software Maintenance 7,800 7,850 9,750 9,750 9,750 10,000 10,000 General Tools 500 600 8,500 600 600 500 500 HydroCad Software 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 Desktop Computer(new position) - - - - 2,500 - - Replace Office Chairs - 425 425 - 425 - 425 Total _ 9,050 9,200 19,000 11,100 14,025 11,250 11,675 6212 MOTOR FUELS/OILS No lead Fuel 2,750 2,800 3,500 4,190 4,190 4,000 4,000 Oils 300 300 300 325 325 325 325 Total 3,050 3,100 3,800 4,515 4,515 4,325 4,325 6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS Fleet Parts 600 750 600 750 500 750 500 600 750 600 750 500 750 500 6216 EQUIPMENT-TIRES/BATTERIES Eng Fleet 700 750 600 750 750 750 750 Total 700 750 600 750 750 750 750 6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES Survey Lath 600 350 350 400 300 300 300 Marking Paint 600 350 350 400 300 300 300 1,200 700 700 800 600 600 600 6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES General Consulting Eng Services 13,000 20,500 20,500 22,000 22,000 20,000 20,000 Traffic Consulting Eng Services 20,000 25,000 19,000 35,000 35,000 20,000 20,000 Pavement Management Surveys-1/3 per year 20,500 22,000 26,741 27,000 27,000 27,000 27,000 GIS Consulting Services 24,000 20,000 15,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 Total 77,500 87,500 81,241 104,000 104,000 87,000 87,000 6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS Mobile Phones 3,400 2,900 3,106 3,500 3,500 3,600 3,600 Laptop Cell Air Time 1,950 1,950 1,950 1,950 1,950 2,000 2,000 Total 5,350 4,850 5,056 5,450 5,450 5,600 5,600 6239 PRINTING/PUBLISHING Printing Plans/Specs,General Materials 350 350 300 350 350 350 350 Annual City Street Maps 2,500 2,300 2,449 2,450 2,450 2,450 2,450 Record Plans 200 500 200 500 500 Total 3,050 3,150 2,949 3,300 3,300 2,800 2,800 6240 GARBAGE/CLEANING Shredding Services 250 300 250 250 250 250 Total - 250 300 250 250 250 250 6244 ROW PERMIT FEES Fees Paid 2,000 3,000 720 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 Total 2,000 3,000 720 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 156 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 27: PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING-1510 COMPANY 1000: GENERAL FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND 6275 SCHOOL/CONF/EXP-LOCAL MnDOT/LTAP Training 2,000 2,000 2,500 1,500 1,500 - - Inspector School Training - - - 1,000 1,000 - - AutoCad Training 1,500 1,750 1,500 1,500 1,500 2,000 2,000 CEAM and APWA 3,000 3,000 2,376 2,250 2,250 3,000 3,000 Management Training 350 500 - 500 500 ESRI GIS State Conference 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 MnDOT Certifications 2,000 2,000 2,500 1,500 1,500 2,000 2,000 School/Conf Mileage 500 650 400 250 250 500 500 Reduction to trend (2,500) (2,000) - - - Total 10,550 8,600 8,476 9,700 9,700 8,700 8,700 6276 SCHOOL/CONF/EXP-OTHER ESRI National Conference 2,700 2,700 3,500 - - 3,500 3,500 Total 2,700 2,700 3,500 - - 3,500 3,500 6277 MILEAGE ALLOWANCE Meeting Travel 100 100 50 100 100 100 100 School/Conf Mileage 100 100 50 100 100 100 100 Total 200 200 100 200 200 200 200 6280 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS PE License Renewals 370 370 368 - - 490 490 Membership APWA,ASCE and CEAM 2,000 2,000 1,700 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 PCSWMM License(1) 1,200 1,440 1,440 1,440 1,440 1,600 1,600 ESRI Annual Licensing 35,000 40,000 41,426 41,430 41,430 41,430 41,430 Cartegraph On-line Licenses 7,900 8,130 8,131 8,540 8,540 9,000 9,000 Total 46,470 51,940 53,065 53,410 53,410 54,520 54,520 6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE Engineering Staff 1,100 1,500 1,200 1,550 1,550 1,600 1,600 1,100 1,500 1,200 1,550 1,550 1,600 1,600 6745 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT VERF-Vehicle Repl.Charges 10,770 11,040 11040 11,320 11,320 11,600 11,600 Total 10,770 11,040 11,040 11,320 11,320 11,600 11,600 Total Net of Personnel 175,040 189,830 192,747 210,695 213,170 197,045 197,220 TOTAL EXPENSES $ 972,015 $ 968,040 $ 969,972 $ 1,184,625 $ 1,187,100 $ 1,208,285 $ 1,208,460 Revenue $ 870,000 $ 885,000 $ 901,000 $ 885,000 $ 1,026,500 $ 905,000 $ 1,055,500 NET EXPENSES(Revenues) $ (102,015) $ (83,040) $ (68,972) $ (299,625) $ (160,600) $ (303,285) $ (152,960) 157 COMPANY DEPARTMENT BUSINESS UNIT ACTIVITY BUILDING 1000 28 1400 INSPECTIONS Public Works DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY The Building Inspections Division of Public Works is responsible for reviewing proposed building plans and performing field inspections to ensure that residential, commercial, institutional and industrial building projects are in compliance with the State Building Code. The City of Apple Valley is responsible for administering and enforcing the 2020 State Building Code, including the commercial and residential building codes; mechanical codes; electrical codes; plumbing codes; and energy codes. The State of Minnesota administers the elevator codes within the City. SERVICE CATEGORIES The Building Inspections Division provides for the local application of the state building code as required by Minnesota Statutes 326B.133. The following internal and external services are provided by the Building Inspections Division. 1. Building Plan Reviews and Building Permit Services ■ Review proposed building plans for compliance with Minnesota State Building Codes ■ Issue and monitor building permits in accordance with State requirements ■ Collect Met Council SAC fees and building permit fees and State Surcharge 2. Building Permit Inspections Services ■ Schedule inspections with contractors and property owners ■ Conduct inspections during construction for compliance with approved construction plans and building codes ■ Administer special inspections program as required by the State Building Code ■ Issue Certificates of Occupancy upon proper completion of building construction work ■ Provide technical assistance to homeowners during home improvement projects 3. Electrical Permit Services ■ Review plans for compliance with state electrical codes ■ Issue electrical permits for approved construction projects ■ Schedule site inspections and collect permit fees 4. State Building Code Enforcement and Property Damage Services ■ Issue compliance orders or citations for non-compliant construction activities ■ Investigate existing structures that are non-compliant with State Building Codes ■ Coordinate building assessment efforts following natural disasters, catastrophic events and structure fires 158 MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2023 Staff anticipates the increase in permit activity that began in 2021 will continue into 2022 and 2023. Even with the current workforce shortage, delays in production and shipping of materials/equipment, along with interest rates and cost of materials rising, the construction market has not slowed down. The construction industry has found ways to adjust to the challenges facing the industry and keep construction moving along. Permits for multi-family and larger commercial projects anticipated being issued through 2023 include the following: 2022 2023 Business/Development Valuation Business/Development Valuation Johnny Cake Business Center $8,500,000_Eagle Pointe $17,000,000 Pahl's Market Mercantile $850,000 _Existing Panera Site $500,000 — AV Lincoln Redevelopment $1,000,000 U-Haul Addition $1,000,000 MN Zoo Tree Top Trail $28,000,000 Abdallah Addition $3,200,000_ The Shores 1/2 Townhomes $7,000,000_AMC/Decor Store $8,500,000 Applewood Pointe $31,500,000 Orchard Place Medical $10,000,000 Cowboy Jack's Addition $500,000 Applewood Pointe Townhomes $1,000,000 Augustana Parking Lot $500,000 _Woodwinds (6 SFD) $3,600,000 AV Mexican Market $6,000,000_Lakeside of Diamond Path (3 SFD) $3,000,000 Cider Ridge Marketplace $1,000,000 Flex Office Structure, Building 1 $20,000,000 Lakeside of Diamond Path (2SFD) $2,000,000 Flex Office Structure, Building 2 $20,000,000 Scannell Office Warehouse $11,000,000 Eagle Brook Church $13,000,000 Lunds & Byerlys $4,600,000 MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2024 Remodeling of existing homes, redevelopment, and commercial building projects will continue to provide a steady workload for inspections staff. The Inspections division has the State delegation for inspections and plan review for public buildings such as schools, the Minnesota Zoo, and State-licensed facilities. These projects will help with future permit revenue. IMPACT MEASURES / PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual Actual Actual Projected Projected Projected Item 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Number of Total Permits 6,534 6,006 6,863 8,000 7,000 7,000 Building Valuation $81M $45M $118M $115M $88M $60M New Single Family Homes 29 3 3 2 3 3 159 Regular Status Personnel Schedule- FTE's Adopted Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Position Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Building Official 1 1 1 1 1 1 Building Inspector 4 4 3 3 3 3 Plumbing/Mechanical Spec 0 0 0 0 0 0 Civil Engineer 0 0 0 .35 .35 .35 Dept Specialists/Clerical 2 2 2 2 2 2 Administrative Specialist 0.5 0.5 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 FT position split with 1510 Temporary Status Personnel Schedule- Hours Adopted Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Position Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 (1) Seasonal Inspector 1040 0 0 0 0 0 Summary Budget Department 28,Business Unit 1400-Building Inspections 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Revenue: 4060 PERMIT-Building Permit 739,158 479,322 999,108 520,000 900,000 965,000 965,000 4073 PERMIT-Plan Review 250,405 88,601 355,309 231,000 262,000 297,000 387,000 4924 PERMIT-Electrical 170,878 112,129 195,180 93,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 4063 PERMIT-Heating 122,915 76,191 179,513 92,000 92,000 92,000 110,000 4065 PERMIT-Plumbing 125,115 97,892 226,805 127,000 140,000 140,000 140,000 4067 PERMIT-Signs/Util Inst - 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,000 4075 Fire Sprinkler/Alarm Permits 20,837 10,161 41,909 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 4077 PERMIT Small Cell 450 - 775 450 300 300 300 4070 PERMIT-Special&Reinsp. 6,442 11,267 8,890 - - - - 4099 PERMIT-Other 650 364 821 500 550 550 550 1,436,851 875,927 2,008,310 1,081,950 1,533,350 1,633,850 1,741,850 Expenditures: Salaries&Wages 492,005 506,379 483,985 491,020 559,600 582,670 615,445 Employee Benefits 174,529 175,702 165,214 169,565 172,855 205,865 217,505 Supplies 10,897 9,518 8,956 12,755 17,150 18,775 18,875 Contractual Services 7,156 3,817 4,920 5,600 5,620 5,625 5,675 Electrical Inspections 110,499 124,078 94,604 74,000 96,000 96,000 88,000 Repairs&Maintenance 324 311 1,057 500 500 500 500 Training/Travel/Dues 6,913 6,307 4,341 10,560 10,285 29,520 32,900 Other Expenses 41,552 48,655 52,451 55,250 56,000 58,100 60,150 VISA M/C 27,343 21,906 26,306 18,000 22,000 23,500 25,000 Vehicle Replacement Fund 12,600 12,980 13,370 13,370 13,770 14,180 14,610 Capital Outlay 1,370 16,257 18,158 - - - - Total Exp 885,188 925,909 873,362 850,620 953,780 1,034,735 1,078,660 Net addition to(use of)general revenues 551,663 (49,982) 1,134,948 231,330 579,570 599,115 663,1901 2023 & 2024 Capital Outlay- None City of Apple Valley 160 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) BUILDING INSPECTIONS 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6110-SALARY-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 484,072 503,607 478,065 464,070 529,365 188,882 553,320 553,320 584,150 584,150 6112-SALARY-SEASONAL TEMP 163 0 0 0 0 0 6113-OVERTIME-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 8,368 3,228 4,254 8,000 8,000 4,918 5,400 5,400 8,000 8,000 6119-ANNUAL LEAVE 27 0 6121-INSURANCE CASH BENEFIT 2,880 3,000 2,880 1,080 6122-COMP REQUEST -3,478 -3,456 -1,241 -1,423 6123-SALARY-OTHER 18,950 22,235 23,950 23,950 23,295 23,295 6105-SALARIES AND WAGES 492,005 506,379 483,985 491,020 559,600 193,458 582,670 582,670 615,445 615,445 6138-MEDICARE 6,927 7,091 6,701 7,120 8,115 2,627 8,450 8,450 8,890 8,890 6139-FICA 29,619 30,156 28,653 30,440 34,695 11,231 36,125 36,125 38,010 38,010 6141-PENSIONS-PERA 36,660 35,778 35,954 36,825 41,970 14,428 43,700 43,700 45,975 45,975 6142-WORKERS COMPENSATION 2,655 2,779 2,922 2,995 3,430 1,334 4,475 4,475 4,950 4,950 6144-LONG-TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE 1,010 994 791 1,355 1,520 284 1,585 1,585 1,670 1,670 6145-MEDICAL INSURANCE 99,342 102,857 95,647 96,730 89,925 31,647 118,430 118,430 124,910 124,910 6146-DENTAL INSURANCE 6,319 6,032 4,612 2,255 6147-LIFE INSURANCE-BASIC 43 40 39 47 6148-LIFE INSURANCE-SUPP/DEPEND 837 942 837 448 6170-EMPLOYEE PAID PREMIUMS -8,883 -10,967 -10,940 -5,900 -6,800 -3,572 -6,900 -6,900 -6,900 -6,900 6125-EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 174,529 175,702 165,214 169,565 172,855 60,729 205,865 205,865 217,505 217,505 6100-TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 666,534 682,081 649,199 660,585 732,455 254,187 788,535 788,535 832,950 832,950 6210-OFFICE SUPPLIES 87 294 252 500 500 112 500 500 500 500 6211-SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT 5,596 3,018 3,854 7,175 11,525 26,877 11,175 11,175 11,175 11,175 6212-MOTOR FUELS/OILS 3,265 1,969 2,534 2,730 2,775 1,597 4,450 4,450 4,550 4,550 6215-EQUIPMENT-PARTS 77 856 133 200 200 83 200 200 200 200 6216-VEHICLES-TIRES/BATTERIES 132 622 122 700 700 0 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6229-GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,739 2,759 2,061 1,450 1,450 303 1,450 1,450 1,450 1,450 6205-SUPPLIES 10,897 9,518 8,956 12,755 17,150 28,972 18,775 18,775 18,875 18,875 6231-LEGAL SERVICES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6235-CONSULTANT SERVICES 0 353 0 200 350 0 350 350 350 350 6237-TELEPHONE/PAGERS 5,103 5,321 3,809 4,100 4,070 1,714 4,125 4,125 4,125 4,125 6239-PRINTING 263 178 348 200 200 60 150 150 200 200 6240-CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE 1,790 936 763 1,100 1,000 497 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6243-ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES 110,499 124,078 94,604 74,000 96,000 95,774 96,000 96,000 88,000 88,000 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 117,655 130,865 99,524 79,600 101,620 98,044 101,625 101,625 93,675 93,675 6265-REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 324 311 1,057 500 500 142 500 500 500 500 6260-REPAIRS AND MAINTENA 324 311 1,057 500 500 142 500 500 500 500 6275-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL 3,396 3,628 2,352 5,745 5,745 2,090 5,745 5,745 6,245 6,245 6276-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP OTHER -45 0 0 650 650 0 650 650 3,150 3,150 6277-MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE 83 0 0 200 200 0 200 200 200 200 6278-SUBSISTENCE ALLOWANCE 0 0 0 100 100 0 100 100 350 350 6280-DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 1,605 1,660 940 2,065 1,690 900 21,925 21,925 22,055 22,055 6281-UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 1,874 1,019 1,048 1,800 1,900 64 900 900 900 900 6270-TRNG/TRAVL/DUES/UNIF 6,913 6,307 4,341 10,560 10,285 3,054 29,520 29,520 32,900 32,900 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 135,789 147,001 113,878 103,415 129,555 130,212 150,420 150,420 145,950 145,950 6310-RENTAL EXPENSE 788 1,122 696 700 700 788 700 700 750 750 6351-VISA/BANK CHARGES 27,343 21,906 26,306 20,000 22,000 10,262 23,500 23,500 25,000 25,000 6399-OTHER CHARGES 40,764 47,532 51,754 52,550 55,300 25,758 57,400 57,400 59,400 59,400 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES 68,895 70,561 78,757 73,250 78,000 36,808 81,600 81,600 85,150 85,150 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES 68,895 70,561 78,757 73,250 78,000 36,808 81,600 81,600 85,150 85,150 6401-EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 City of Apple Valley 161 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) BUILDING INSPECTIONS 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6400-TOTAL EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 6715-CAPITAL OUTLAY-BUILDINGS 16,257 0 0 6725-CAPITAL OUTLAY-OFFICE EQUIP 1,370 0 18,158 0 0 0 6745-VERF CHARGES 12,600 12,980 13,370 13,370 13,770 5,738 14,180 14,180 14,610 14,610 6701-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 13,970 29,237 31,528 13,370 13,770 5,738 14,180 14,180 14,610 14,610 6700-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 13,970 29,237 31,528 13,370 13,770 5,738 14,180 14,180 14,610 14,610 885,188 928,879 873,362 850,620 953,780 426,945 1,034,735 1,034,735 1,078,660 1,078,660 162 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 28: PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING INSPECTIONS-1400 COMPANY 1000: GENERAL FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND REVENUE 4060 Building Permits 520,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 965,000 900,000 965,000 4063 Mechanical Permits 92,000 92,000 110,000 92,000 92,000 110,000 110,000 4065 Plumbing Permits 127,000 140,000 150,000 140,000 140,000 140,000 140,000 4067 Utility Installation 2,000 2,500 2,500 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 4073 Plan Review Fee 224,000 262,000 370,000 262,000 297,000 350,000 387,000 4075 Fire Sprinkler/Alarm Permits(70 Fire/30) 20,000 16,000 15,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 4077 Small Cell Permits(70 Eng/30 Insp) 450 300 - 300 300 300 300 4099 Other Revenue 500 550 450 550 550 550 550 4924 Electrical Permits 93,000 120,000 200,000 120,000 120,000 110,000 120,000 Total 1,078,950 1,533,350 1,747,950 1,533,850 1,633,850 1,629,850 1,741,850 SALARIESI 6110 Salary-Regular Employees 464,070 529,365 500,000 553,320 553,320 584,150 584,150 6113 Overtime-Reg 8,000 8,000 7,000 5,400 5,400 8,000 8,000 6123 Salaries-Other 18,950 22,235 - 23,950 23,950 23,295 23,295 6138 Medicare 7,120 8,115 8,115 8,450 8,450 8,890 8,890 6139 FICA 30,440 34,695 34,695 36,125 36,125 38,010 38,010 6141 Pension-PERA 36,825 41,970 41,970 43,700 43,700 45,975 45,975 6142 Work Comp Insurance 2,995 3,430 3,430 4,475 4,475 4,950 4,950 6144 Long-term Disability Insurance 1,355 1,520 1,520 1,585 1,585 1,670 1,670 6145 Hospital&Life Insurance 96,730 89,925 89,925 118,430 118,430 124,910 124,910 6170 Employee Paid Premiums (5,900) (6,800) (6,800) (6,900) (6,900) (6,900) (6,900) Total 660,585 732,455 679,855 788,535 788,535 832,950 832,950 6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES General Supplies 200 250 300 250 250 250 250 Shelving and Office Items 300 250 300 250 250 250 250 Total 500 500 600 500 500 500 500 6211 SMALL TOOL&EQUIPMENT Shoe Slip Covers-Disposable - 350 - - - - - Electronic Plan Review Software 4,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 Replacement of Broken Laptops 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Smart Phones 600 600 - 600 600 600 600 Replace Office Chair 425 425 425 425 425 425 425 Hard Hats and Safety Vest 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 Total 7,175 11,525 10,575 11,175 11,175 11,175 11,175 6212 MOTOR FUELS/OILS Vehicle#'s 101, 102,104, 105,&107 Unlead Fuel 2,500 2,450 4,500 4,000 4,000 4,100 4,100 Oils 230 325 400 450 450 450 450 Total 2,730 2,775 4,900 4,450 4,450 4,550 4,550 6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS Inspection Vehicles and Equipment 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 Total 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 6216 EQUIPMENT-TIRES/BATTERIES Inspection Vehicles 700 700 700 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Total 700 700 700 1,0001 1,000 1,0001 1,000 6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES Home and Garden Show Supplies 450 450 400 450 450 450 450 New Code Books/Electronic Downloads 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Total 1,450 1,450 1,400 1,450 1,450 1,450 1,450 6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES SSTS Plan Reviews and Inspections 200 350 350 350 350 350 350 Total 200 350 350 350 350 350 350 6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS Mobile Phones 2,200 2,150 1,900 2,175 2,175 2,175 2,175 Mobile Laptops 1,900 1,920 1,720 1,950 1,950 1,950 1,950 Total 4,100 4,070 3,620 4,125 4,125 4,125 4,125 6239 PRINTING/PUBLISHING Correction Notice Booklets - 100 - - 100 100 Forms/Convert Microfische Plans 200 100 100 150 150 100 100 Total 200 200 100 150 150 200 200 6240 GARBAGE/CLEANING - Shredding Service(Moved from 6249) 1,100 1,000 800 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Total 1,100 1,000 800 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6243 ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES Fees for Contract Electrical Inspector 74,000 96,000 160,000 96,000 96,000 88,000 88,000 Total 74,000 96,000 160,000 96,000 96,000 88,000 88,000 163 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 28: PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING INSPECTIONS-1400 COMPANY 1000: GENERAL FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND 6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT Office Equipment 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 Total 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 6275 SCHOOL/CONF/EXP-LOCAL Monthly Meetings-Dakota County 750 750 750 750 750 850 850 U of M Annual IBO School(2 days/Insp) 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,500 1,500 MAPMO MN Chapter 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 Municipals 145 145 145 145 145 145 145 ICC Upper Great Plains Inst Seminar(2) 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 Total 5,745 5,745 5,745 5,745 5,745 6,245 6,245 6276 SCHOOL/CONF/EXP-OTHER State Conference In-State Only 650 650 650 650 650 650 650 Avolve ProjectDox User Conference - - - - 2,500 2,500 Total 650 650 650 650 650 3,150 3,150 6277 MILEAGE ALLOWANCE School/Conference Mileage 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 Total 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 6278 SUBSISTENCE ALLOWANCE Building Official Conference 100 100 - 100 100 100 100 Avolve ProjectDox User Conference - - - - 250 250 Total 100 100 - 100 100 350 350 6280 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS License Renewals(State,ICC) 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 IAPMO 265 300 325 325 325 325 325 MBPTA Permit Tech 235 100 - 100 100 100 100 10,000 Lakes MN Building Officials 190 310 310 310 310 310 310 MAPMO-Plumbing&Mechanical 180 150 150 150 150 150 150 Avolve Software Annual License - - 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 AMBO Membership 435 315 - 320 320 450 450 ICC Memberships 310 265 265 270 270 270 270 Reduction - (200) Total 2,065 1,690 21,500 21,925 21,925 22,055 22,055 6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE Building Inspectors 1,800 1,900 900 900 900 900 900 Total 1,800 1,900 900 900 900 900 900 6310 RENTAL EXPENSE Home and Garden Show Booth Rental 700 700 700 700 700 750 750 Total 700 700 700 700 700 750 750 6399 OTHER CHARGES LOGIS PIMS/ePermits&Avolve Hosting 52,550 55,300 54,000 57,400 57,400 59,400 59,400 Total 52,550 55,300 54,000 57,400 57,400 59,400 59,400 6351 VISA/BANK CHARGES Credit Card System Fees 20,000 22,000 25,000 23,500 23,500 25,000 25,000 Total 20,000 22,000 25,000 23,500 23,500 25,000 25,000 6725 CAPITAL OUTLAY-OFFICE EQUIP Total - - - - - - - 6745 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT VERF-Vehicle Repl.Charges 13,370 13,770 13,770 14,180 14,180 14,610 14,610 Total 13,370 13,770 13,770 14,180 14,180 14,610 14,610 Total Net of Personnel 190,035 221,325 306,210 246,200 246,200 245,710 245,710 TOTAL EXPENSES 850,620 953,780 $ 986,065 $ 1,034,735 $ 1,034,735 $ 1,078,660 $ 1,078,660 Revenue 1,078,950 1,533,350 $ 1,747,950 $ 1,533,850 $ 1,633,850 $ 1,629,850 $ 1,741,850 NET REVENUES(EXPENSES) 228,330 579,570 $ 761,885 $ 499,115 $ 599,115 $ 551,190 $ 663,190 164 ••• •••• ••••• ••• AppValley Notes: 165 COMPANY DEPARTMENT BUSINESS UNIT ACTIVITY 1000 30 1530 FLEET & BUILDINGS Public Works DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY The Public Works Central Maintenance Division is responsible for maintaining the City's vehicle fleet consisting of just under 300 pieces of equipment and vehicles. Routine preventative maintenance and full-service repair work is performed on City-owned vehicles and equipment including small equipment like weed whips, push mowers, snow blowers, etc. by staff mechanics. This division also operates and maintains the central fuel dispensing system located at the Central Maintenance Facility. The Central Maintenance Division maintains the buildings and grounds for the Central Maintenance Facility (Public Works and Parks Maintenance). Personnel within the division perform building maintenance, cleaning, stocking of general supplies and facility repairs as well as operate the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems. This division also supervises HVAC systems and building maintenance personnel at the Municipal Center (City Hall/Police). SERVICE CATEGORIES The Public Works Central maintenance Division provides a centralized source for the following services related to fleet and building functions for the City of Apple Valley. 1. City Fleet Repair and Maintenance Services ■ Provide repair and preventative maintenance services for City owned vehicles and equipment, ranging from major engine repair to routine oil changes ■ Provide initial equipment set-up and supply replacement parts for City fleet ■ Track replacement cycles and consolidate replacement costs for City fleet ■ Coordinate auto body repair work with vendors for damaged City vehicles ■ Coordinate warranty repair work with vendors for City Fleet 2. Buildings and Grounds Custodial Services ■ Provide routine custodial services for the Municipal Center, Police Department and Central Maintenance Facility ■ Administer contract services for cleaning (i.e. window cleaning, carpet cleaning, etc.) ■ Provide/Administer lawn care, landscape maintenance and snow plowing for city facilities 3. Building Maintenance and Repair Services ■ Maintain heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems, electrical systems, and plumbing systems for the Municipal Center, Police Department and Central Maintenance Facility ■ Provide contract repair of city building structures, such as repairs to roofs, doors, flooring and other building components 166 • Provide planning and budgeting for building improvements at the Municipal Center, Police Department and Central Maintenance Facility 4. City Fuel Supply Services • Purchase diesel and unleaded fuel for City fleet, including Police, Fire, Public Works and Parks Department • Maintain 20,000 gallon central fuel supply system located at the Central Maintenance Facility • Monitor and report fuel consumption to Finance Department of proper coding to City departments 5. Fleet Acquisition and Disposition Services • Assist departments with specifications for replacement vehicles • Coordinate vehicle purchasing process, typically under the State Cooperative Purchasing Program (State Contract) • Provide for disposition of City vehicles and forfeiture vehicles through auctions MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2023/2024 In addition to recurring annual duties, the primary 2023/2024 goals for this division include the following items. In 2023: • Continue to add data to complete implementation of AssetWorks. • Start the bid process & begin construction for CMF expansion. In 2024: • Complete construction of CMF Expansion Project. IMPACT MEASURES / PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual Actual Actual Projected Projected Projected Item 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Number of Fleet Equip Items 269 280 283 285 290 290 Number of Equipment Repair Orders 1831 955 877 950 1100 1300 Number of Vehicles Replaced 14 32 21 14 21 21 Gallons of Fuel Supplied 122,606 101,455 106,848 109000 110500 112000 Miles Driven 834,618 698,514 805,164 850,000 900,000 900,000 Fleet Repair Hours 3004 4094 3008 3300 3400 4000 Regular Status Personnel Schedule— FTE's Adopted Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Position Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Public Works Supervisor 1 1 1 1 1 1 Fleet Maintenance Foreman 1 1 1 1 1 1 Fleet Maintenance/Mechanic 3 3 3 3 3 4 Building Maintenance 1 1 1 1 1 1 Part Time Janitorial (CMF 1 expansion completion) 167 Temporary Status Personnel Schedule - Hours Adopted Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Position Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Seasonal Maintenance 700 700 1200 1400 1100 1200 Summary Budget Department 30, Business Unit 1530- Fleet&Buildings-CMF 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Expenditures: Salaries&Wages 409,669 434,275 455,696 472,520 480,015 533,845 613,175 Employee Benefits 137,771 162,071 170,375 169,895 174,275 185,405 203,710 Supplies 32,080 22,387 21,884 27,450 28,069 31,825 30,375 Contractual Services 38,896 33,034 39,957 39,565 42,540 54,740 55,950 Utilities 71,093 68,019 68,893 71,200 72,950 89,500 92,700 Repairs&Maintenance 23,545 32,851 15,215 29,500 28,500 30,100 28,300 Training/Travel/Dues 6,500 12,446 14,632 14,495 15,085 16,240 17,385 Other Expenses 7,395 7,729 5,849 7,540 7,840 8,000 7,965 Vehicle Replacement Fund 2,850 5,700 7,130 7,130 8,910 10,250 14,290 Capital Outlay 17,095 4,920 5,490 6,200 - - 18,000 Total Exp 746,894 783,434 805,123 845,495 858,184 959,905 1,081,850 Net addition to(use of) (746,894) (783,434) (805,123) (845,495) (858,184) (959,905) (1,081,850) general revenues 2023 Capital Outlay None 2024 Capital Outlay Large Truck/Tractor Tire Changing Machine $18,000 City of Apple Valley 168 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) CMF-FLEET& BUILDINGS 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6110-SALARY-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 406,197 429,134 447,362 438,230 454,915 223,734 518,845 504,915 582,170 537,525 6112-SALARY-SEASONAL TEMP 8,771 15,120 11,901 14,000 14,300 14,411 33,200 18,200 64,625 64,625 6113-OVERTIME-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 2,829 1,685 1,903 3,000 3,000 868 3,100 3,100 3,100 3,100 6119-ANNUAL LEAVE 4,135 551 6121-INSURANCE CASH BENEFIT 3,060 3,600 3,600 2,760 6122-COMP REQUEST -11,189 -15,264 -13,205 -10,000 -9,352 -10,000 -10,000 -10,000 -10,000 6123-SALARY-OTHER 17,290 17,800 18,060 17,630 21,015 17,925 6105-SALARIES AND WAGES 409,669 434,275 455,696 472,520 480,015 232,972 563,205 533,845 660,910 613,175 6138-MEDICARE 5,927 6,268 6,563 6,850 7,070 3,429 8,095 7,855 9,065 8,370 6139-FICA 25,344 26,372 28,063 29,295 30,225 14,661 34,610 33,595 38,760 35,800 6141-PENSIONS-PERA 27,877 31,165 32,901 34,390 35,490 15,223 40,500 39,270 45,470 41,890 6142-WORKERS COMPENSATION 10,519 12,946 14,772 15,380 15,895 6,958 18,490 17,840 22,015 20,025 6144-LONG-TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE 741 863 755 1,300 1,295 317 1,475 1,430 1,660 1,530 6145-MEDICAL INSURANCE 64,279 80,342 84,373 87,780 85,500 26,499 89,745 86,615 112,055 97,295 6146-DENTAL INSURANCE 5,179 6,519 6,499 2,970 6147-LIFE INSURANCE-BASIC 32 36 40 56 6148-LIFE INSURANCE-SUPP/DEPEND 5,126 6,490 6,529 3,590 6170-EMPLOYEE PAID PREMIUMS -7,252 -8,929 -10,120 -5,100 -1,200 0 -1,200 -1,200 -1,200 -1,200 6125-EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 137,771 162,071 170,375 169,895 174,275 73,702 191,715 185,405 227,825 203,710 6100-TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 547,440 596,347 626,072 642,415 654,290 306,674 754,920 719,250 888,735 816,885 6210-OFFICE SUPPLIES 97 141 133 300 300 0 200 200 200 200 6211-SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT 9,152 9,383 6,772 7,100 7,162 3,104 9,800 9,800 8,150 8,150 6212-MOTOR FUELS/OILS 1,802 1,566 1,943 1,800 1,800 1,195 3,325 3,325 2,950 2,950 6215-EQUIPMENT-PARTS 3,828 997 1,073 4,500 4,807 1,424 4,500 4,000 4,650 4,150 6216-VEHICLES-TIRES/BATTERIES 251 673 1,313 350 400 -15 400 400 400 400 6229-GENERAL SUPPLIES 16,950 9,627 10,650 13,400 13,600 6,270 14,100 14,100 14,525 14,525 6205-SUPPLIES 32,080 22,387 21,884 27,450 28,069 11,978 32,325 31,825 30,875 30,375 6231-LEGAL SERVICES 173 6235-CONSULTANT SERVICES 617 308 375 330 330 232 330 330 350 350 6237-TELEPHONE/PAGERS 18,376 13,388 17,786 18,770 19,200 9,347 19,425 19,425 19,725 19,725 6238-POSTAGE/UPS/FEDEX 0 45 0 0 6239-PRINTING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6240-CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE 18,295 17,206 20,596 18,850 21,455 12,334 33,050 33,050 33,900 33,900 6249-OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,608 2,088 1,200 1,615 1,555 1,656 1,935 1,935 1,975 1,975 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 38,896 33,034 39,957 39,565 42,540 23,742 54,740 54,740 55,950 55,950 6255-UTILITIES-ELECTRIC 22,904 24,525 23,151 23,200 23,970 13,921 29,000 25,000 29,900 25,900 6256-UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS 41,368 33,561 35,716 39,000 39,780 43,571 50,000 54,000 52,000 56,000 6257-UTILITIES-PROPANE/WATER/SEWER 6,821 9,933 11,026 9,000 9,200 9,233 10,500 10,500 10,800 10,800 6250-UTILITIES 71,093 68,019 69,893 71,200 72,950 66,725 89,500 89,500 92,700 92,700 6265-REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 1,514 2,129 3,657 4,500 3,000 3,576 3,100 3,100 3,300 3,300 6266-REPAIRS-BUILDING 22,031 30,722 11,557 25,000 25,500 16,191 27,000 27,000 25,000 25,000 6260-REPAIRS AND MAINTENA 23,545 32,851 15,215 29,500 28,500 19,767 30,100 30,100 28,300 28,300 6275-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXPLOCAL 1,317 339 1,109 1,900 1,430 184 1,450 1,450 3,500 3,500 6277-MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE 319 257 183 275 280 0 280 280 285 285 6280-DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 401 7,229 9,696 7,420 9,225 8,301 9,435 9,435 9,200 9,200 6281-UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 4,463 4,621 3,645 4,900 4,150 1,418 5,075 5,075 4,400 4,400 6270-TRNGITRAVLJDUES/UNIF 6,500 12,446 14,632 14,495 15,085 9,902 16,240 16,240 17,385 17,385 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 172,114 168,738 161,581 182,210 187,144 132,114 222,905 222,405 225,210 224,710 6333-GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS -1 -66 -10 -9 6349-LATE FEES/FINANCE CHARGES 5 0 1 0 6399-OTHER CHARGES 7,391 7,794 5,858 7,540 7,840 5,253 8,000 8,000 7,965 7,965 City of Apple Valley 169 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) CMF-FLEET&BUILDINGS 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES 7,395 7,729 5,849 7,540 7,840 5,244 8,000 8,000 7,965 7,965 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES 7,395 7,729 5,849 7,540 7,840 5,244 8,000 8,000 7,965 7,965 6501-TAXABLE/NON-TAXABLE MISC RESAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 6500-TOTAL EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 0 0 6730-CAPITAL OUTLAY-TRANSPORTATION 0 0 0 0 0 0 6735-CAPITAL OUTLAY-OTHER IMPROVEME 17,095 4,920 5,490 6,200 0 0 0 0 18,000 18,000 6740-CAPITAL OUTLAY-MACH/EQ/OTHER 0 0 0 0 6745-VERFCHARGES 2,850 5,700 7,130 7,130 8,910 3,713 10,250 10,250 14,290 14,290 6701-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 19,945 10,620 12,620 13,330 8,910 3,713 10,250 10,250 32,290 32,290 6700-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 19,945 10,620 12,620 13,330 8,910 3,713 10,250 10,250 32,290 32,290 746,894 783,434 806,122 845,495 858,184 447,744 996,075 959,905 1,154,200 1,081,850 179 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 31: STREET MAINTENANCE-1600 Public Works Department COMPANY 1000: GENERAL FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND SALARIES 6110 Regular Employees 1,067,150 1,161,270 1,217,000.00 1,201,735 1,201,735 1,264,900 1,264,900 6112 Salary-Seasonal Temp 55,000 42,300 40,000 46,000 46,000 46,200 46,200 6113 Overtime-Reg 38,000 39,000 25,000 39,000 39,000 40,000 40,000 6122 Comp Request - (10,000) (10,000.00) (20,000) (30,000) (20,000) (30,000) 6123 Salaries-Other 49,860 56,940 56,940 56,680 56,680 46,065 46,065 6138 Medicare 16,985 18,845 18,845 19,480 19,480 20,260 20,260 6139 FICA 72,635 80,570 80,570 83,290 83,290 86,625 86,625 6141 Pension-PERA 83,740 94,290 94,290 97,305 97,305 101,320 101,320 6142 Worker's Compensation Insurance 82,415 101,475 101,475 104,685 104,685 114,260 114,260 6144 Long-Term Disability Insurance 3,220 3,350 3,350 3,460 3,460 3,605 3,605 6145 Hospital&Life Insurance 249,000 287,495 287,495 257,040 257,040 287,435 287,435 6170 Employee Paid Premiums (26,000) (13,800) (13,800) (14,100) (30,000) (14,100) (40,325) Total 1,692,005 1,861,735 1,901,165 1,874,575 1,848,675 1,976,570 1,940,345 6211 SMALL TOOL&EQUIPMENT Miscellaneous Tools,Toolbox 5,150 5,200 5,200 5,250 5,250 5,300 5,300 Replace Weed Whips 380 390 390 400 400 410 410 Chain Saw Replacement 1,030 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Cutoff Saw Replace 1,500 1,500 Push Lawn Mower - 600 600 Back Pack Blower - - - 400 400 - - Slab Lifter Bucket - - - 3,000 3,000 - - Hand Grinder Replace 430 - - 450 450 - - Fairmont Pole Saw Replace - - - 3,300 3,300 - - Battery Powered Pole Saws - - - 2,500 2,500 - - Replacement iPads for Field Staff(1) - 1,000 1,000 1,200 1,200 1,000 1,000 PreCise to Cartegraph API - 5,000 5,000 - - Turfco T3100 Fertilizer Spreader 10,680 - - - - Total 17,670 12,590 12,590 17,500 17,500 9,810 9,810 6212 MOTOR FUELS/OILS No Lead Fuel 11,400 11,330 12,500 16,400 16,400 14,481 14,481 Diesel Fuel 60,500 64,220 67,000 96,000 96,000 81,354 81,354 Diesel Road Tax 3,600 - 1,300 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Fluids,Coolant&Propane 3,100 3,160 3,160 3,200 3,200 3,300 3,300 Oil 7,000 7,300 7,300 7,300 7,300 7,400 7,400 Total 85,600 86,010 91,260 124,900 124,900 108,535 108,535 6214 CHEMICALS Street Maintenance Products 250 250 250 400 400 1,200 1,200 Weed Killer(from 6229) 4,150 4,200 4,200 5,000 5,000 5,050 5,050 Total 4,400 4,450 4,450 5,400 5,400 6,250 6,250 6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS Mowers/Tractors 4,220 4,300 4,300 4,330 4,330 4,375 4,375 Trucks/Other Vehicles 44,340 44,800 44,800 45,000 45,000 45,300 45,300 Stump Grinder Teeth 2,110 2,000 2,000 2,050 2,050 2,100 2,100 Total 50,670 51,100 51,100 51,380 51,380 51,775 51,775 6216 EQUIPMENT-TIRES/BATTERIES Batteries 2,110 2,130 2,130 2,150 2,150 2,170 2,170 Tires-Vehicles 6,240 6,300 6,300 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Tires-Off Road Tires 5,150 5,200 5,200 8,000 8,000 6,500 6,500 Total 13,500 13,630 13,630 20,150 20,150 18,670 18,670 6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES 3/8"Granite Chips for Pothole Patching 3,500 3,700 3,700 3,900 3,900 4,000 4,000 Bituminous Hot Mix 6,000 6,500 7,500 7,000 7,000 9,000 9,000 Bituminous Cold Mix 1,700 2,630 2,800 2,630 2,630 2,800 2,800 1"Crushed Limestone 1,000 1,000 250 - - - - 1-1/2"Crushed Rock 750 750 250 500 500 500 500 Sod/Black Dirt (Sidewalk Repairs) 5,000 5,500 5,500 6,000 6,000 6,200 6,200 Trees for Ring Route Replacement 3,000 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,700 1,700 Hardware&Supplies 3,170 3,175 3,175 3,200 3,200 3,225 3,225 Mulch and Landscape Supplies-Cedar 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Concrete Sealer-Ring Route&Cedar 7,470 7,470 5,826 6,000 6,000 6,200 6,200 Asphalt Emulsifier 7,260 7,300 7,300 7,450 7,450 7,600 7,600 Safety Equipment(+Chainsaw Boots) 2,390 3,000 3,000 3,100 3,100 3,150 3,150 Ring Route Flag Replacement - 1,000 836 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Grass Seed 770 770 770 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Total 43,010 45,295 43,407 44,280 44,280 47,375 47,375 180 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 31: STREET MAINTENANCE-1600 Public Works Department COMPANY 1000: GENERAL FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND 6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES Safety(Safety Glasses,hepatitis, 1,690 1,700 1,700 1,710 1,710 1,720 1,720 respirator,hearing&drug testing) Total 1,690 1,700 1,700 1,710 1,710 1,720 1,720 6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS Mobile Phones 2,300 2,550 2,550 2,600 2,600 2,650 2,650 Mobile Air Cards 7,920 8,160 8,160 8,200 8,200 8,250 8,250 Total 10,220 10,710 10,710 10,800 10,800 10,900 10,900 6239 PRINTING/PUBLISHING Work Orders,Advertising,Misc 60 65 - 70 70 70 70 Temp No Parking Signs(4th of July) 430 440 440 450 325 455 330 DOT Safety Inspection Books 230 235 235 240 165 300 225 Total 720 740 675 760 560 825 625 6240 C.SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVAL Landfill Dumping Fee(SET,rolloff dump, 7,390 7,500 7,500 7,525 7,525 7,550 7,550 road kill,stump grindings-disposal) - - - - - - - Leaves-disposal 2,320 2,350 2,350 2,400 2,400 2,450 2,450 Total 9,710 9,850 9,850 9,925 9,925 10,000 10,000 6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES Curb,Gutter,Sidewalk Replace/Mud Jack 55,000 55,000 60,000 70,000 70,000 72,000 72,000 STS Crews 15,310 15,400 15,400 15,600 15,600 15,800 15,800 Ring Route Painting 60,180 55,000 45,252 50,500 50,500 55,000 55,000 Colored Concrete Sealing-Ring Route 12,670 12,000 9,990 12,100 12,100 12,000 12,000 Colored Concrete Sealing-Cedar Ave 12,670 12,000 9,990 12,100 12,100 12,000 12,000 Cedar Avenue Irrigation System Maintenance 7,390 7,400 6,000 7,420 7,420 7,440 7,440 RR Misc.(Masonry,Trees,Sidewalks) 5,280 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Repair&Resurface Pathways 30,900 31,000 32,108 31,100 31,100 33,000 33,000 Boulevard Weed Spraying 5,810 6,000 6,000 6,100 6,100 6,200 6,200 800 mHz Radios 310 315 1,000 320 320 330 330 Tree trimming,removal,stump grinding 25,000 20,000 25,826 20,000 20,000 25,000 25,000 Reduction to trend - - - (5,000) (5,000) Total 230,520 219,115 216,566 230,240 225,240 243,770 238,770 6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC Galaxie Sprinklers 420 430 430 435 435 440 440 Cedar Avenue 100 100 100 105 105 110 110 Gallavant Sprinklers 350 355 355 360 360 365 365 Total 870 885 885 900 900 915 915 6257 UTILITIES-WATER/SEWER Gallavant/Galaxie Sprinklers 330 340 340 350 350 355 355 Cedar Avenue 1,300 1,325 1,325 1,350 1,350 1,360 1,360 Total 1,630 1,665 1,665 1,700 1,700 1,715 1,715 6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT Heavy Equipment 10,920 11,100 11,100 12,100 12,100 12,600 12,600 2-Way Radios,Pagers 1,000 1,030 1,030 1,050 1,050 1,200 1,200 Paint/Repair Truck frame/box 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,250 2,250 2,000 2,000 Stepp Asphalt Patcher Tune-Up 3,000 3,500 3,500 3,750 3,750 3 Bucket Truck Annual Inspections 1,850 1,935 1,935 2,000 2,000 2,100 2,100 Total 16,270 16,565 19,565 20,900 20,900 21,650 21,650 6275 SCHOOLS/CONF/EXP-LOCAL MN APWA/T2/Snow Plow Seminar 660 675 675 700 700 725 725 Supervisor Training 340 350 350 360 360 1,000 1,000 Misc.LTAP,etc Seminars/Classes 1,580 1,600 1,600 1,700 1,700 5,000 5,000 Training For New CDL Operators - - - 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 Total 2,580 2,625 2,625 8,760 8,760 12,725 12,725 6280 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS Superintendent Assoc.&Subscription 440 400 - 410 410 420 420 APWA Dues 440 450 460 460 460 470 470 Cartegraph On-line Licenses 5,780 5,955 5,955 6,250 6,250 6,600 6,600 Total 6,660 6,805 6,415 7,120 7,120 7,490 7,490 6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE Uniforms&Boots 11,000 11,500 11,500 11,800 11,800 12,000 12,000 Total 11,000 11,500 11,500 11,800 11,800 12,000 12,000 181 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 31: STREET MAINTENANCE-1600 Public Works Department COMPANY 1000: GENERAL FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND 6730 CAPITAL OUTLAY-VEHICLES Replace Single Axle 300 Plow$330,00 VERF VERF Replace Single Axle 322 Plow,$240,000 VERF VERF Replace 3/4 Ton Chevy#331$45,000 VERF VERF Replace 3/4 Ton Chevy#341$45,000 VERF VERF Replace Single Axle 301 Plow$250,000 - VERF VERF Replace 3/4 Ton Chevy#337$45,000 VERF VERF Annual Replacement Charge for Tool Cat#346$10,000 VERF VERF VERF Annual Replacement Charge for Tool Cat#347$10,000 VERF VERF VERF Replace Air Compressor#302$18,900 I VERF VERF Replace Replace Dura Patcher#354$105,100 VERF VERF Replace Single Axle 305 Plow$240,000 VERF VERF Replace Daewood Forklift-$31,500 VERF VERF Replace Dura Patch Unit-$105,100 VERF VERF Replace Aebi Tractor w/Track Skid Steer#334-$160,000 VERF 61,795 Replace JD Mower#335-$38,800 VERF VERF Replace JD Mower#349-$38,800 VERF VERF Total - - 61,795 - - - 6740 CAPITAL OUTLAY-OTHER ITEMS Add Anti-Ice Unit for#340 - Add Concrete Repair Trailer 15,000 15,000 Add Screener Bucket 17,500 Add Blacktop Roller-$17,000 17,000 Add Mini-Excavator(with Storm and Cemetery) 30,000 30,000 Add Roller Trailer 8,000 6,144 - - Replace Vermeer Chipper 309-$80,000 Upgrade AccuBrine Machine$69,815 In Muni Bldg Replace Chipper#342-$80,000 VERF Replace Skid Steer Trailer 8,000 Add Crash Attenuator 15,000 - 40,000 VERF Total 42,500 38,000 21,144 30,000 30,000 40,000 - 6745 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT VERF-Vehicle Repl.Charges 340,400 428,000 428,000 440,770 440,770 453,920 453,920 VEHICLE-Fleet Addition Pick Up-Superintendent/Supervisor Total 340,400 428,000 428,000 440,770 440,770 453,920 453,920 Total Net of Personnel 889,620 961,235 1,009,532 1,038,995 1,033,795 1,060,045 1,014,845 TOTAL EXPENSES 2,581,625 2,822,970 2,910,697 2,913,570 2,882,470 3,036,615 2,955,190 173 COMPANY DEPARTMENT BUSINESS UNIT ACTIVITY 1000 31 1600 STREETS MAINTENANCE Public Works DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY The Public Works Streets Division is responsible for maintaining the local streets system consisting of approximately 430 lane miles of roadway. Duties include repairing street pavement sections; repair and maintenance of storm drainage catch basins and storm water management ponds; and maintenance of sidewalks and on-street pathways throughout the community. This division is also responsible for boulevard maintenance, tree trimming and forestry maintenance work for trees located within the public street right-of-way. In addition, the City owned cemetery is maintained and managed by this division. SERVICE CATEGORIES The Public Works Street Division provides a centralized source for the following internal and external services related to street maintenance functions for the City of Apple Valley. 1. Street Maintenance and Preservation Services ■ Repair structural and surface failure of street pavement (patching, pothole repair, etc.) ■ Remove and replace sections of damaged curb and valley gutters ■ Conduct crack sealing and micro surfacing to preserve street pavements ■ Conduct street sweeping on public streets, removing approximately 500 tons of material per year 2. Sidewalk and Trail System Maintenance Services ■ Inspect one-third of all sidewalk sections each year to identify repair needs ■ Remove and replace concrete sidewalk sections as determined during inspections, or from Emerald Ash Borer Tree Removals. ■ Conduct concrete leveling work to repair uneven concrete joints (trip hazards) ■ Repair and maintain segments of trail system located in the right-of-way(excludes segments of public trails located in city parks) 3. Boulevard Tree Maintenance Services ■ Trim boulevard trees to maintain minimum vertical clearance for roadways ■ Remove dead or diseased trees located within the public right-of-way ■ Grind Stumps and perform turf restorations ■ Remove debris from streets following severe storm events 4. Drainage System Maintenance Services ■ Inspect and repair storm sewer catch basins along roadways ■ Inspect and clear pond outlets to prevent blockages and associated flooding ■ Repair inlet and outlet pipe connections to storm water ponds ■ Remove accumulated sediment deltas from ponds 174 • Contractual work associated with storm drainage system maintenance is funded by the Storm Drainage Utility, see Business Unit 5505 5. Turf Mowing Services • Mow and Weed Whip approximately 76 miles of boulevards along collector streets with adjacent trail systems • Mow and remove excess vegetation adjacent to storm water ponds • Provide additional turf mowing along County right-of-ways to maintain community appearance 6. Cemetery Services • Lot and columbarium sales • Internments • Maintain turf, trees and plantings • Routine grounds maintenance to ensure a well-groomed appearance MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2023 In addition to recurring annual duties, the following major objectives are established for 2023 within this business unit. • Continue pavement preservation program (microsurfacing/crack sealing) for public streets and trails. • Increase the amount of asphalt patching and storm sewer repairs. • Conduct an inventory of existing storm water ponds throughout the city to identify and prioritize maintenance needs, including dredging and removal of sand deltas. • Staff plans to continue to implement a mobile management system to the street sweeping operation in order to accurately monitor and record service levels to address State and Federal mandates for water quality improvements. • Additional seeding, landscaping and tree planting as needed. • Expand the use of PreCise MRM to create efficiencies within the department. • Concentrated effort to move to more digital work order system & expand the use of Cartegraph, the City's asset management system to field staff. • Advance in technology use to allow Cartegraph OMS to link with PreCise AVL. • Add a mini-excavator to the fleet to aide in Storm Pond sediment removal and cemetery grave digging. MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2024 In addition to recurring annual duties, the following major objectives are established for 2024 within this business unit. • Continue expanded use of Cartegraph, the City's asset management system to field staff. • Cemetery Master Plan Improvements • Continue standard operating procedures within the Street Maintenance Division 175 IMPACT MEASURES / PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual Actual Actual Projected Projected Projected Item 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Number of Lane Miles of 430 430 430 431 431 431 Street Maintained Number of Blvd Trees 1,500 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 Maintained Street Sweeping (Ton) 545 610 550 660 575 575 R/W Trails Maintained (mile) 63 63 63 63 65 65 Sidewalk Maintained (mile) 139 145 145 145 145 145 Leaves Collected (Cu.Yd.) 1,600 1,300 1073 1,300 1,400 1,400 Adopted Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Position Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Public Works Supt. 1 1 1 1 1 1 Public Works Supervisor 1 1 1 1 1 1 Streets Foreman 2 2 2 2 2 2 Technical Specialist 2 2 2 2 2 2 Maintenance I/II 10 10 11 11 11 11 Adopted Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Position Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Seasonal Street Maint. 4,150 4,150 4,150 4,150 4,150 4,150 Summary Budget Department 31 Street Maintenance 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Proposed Proposed Proposed Expenditures: Salaries&Wages 1,012,555 979,195 968,909 1,210,010 1,289,510 1,313,415 1,367,165 Employee Benefits 406,958 418,489 416,166 481,995 572,225 535,260 573,180 Supplies 209,899 179,622 202,787 214,850 213,075 263,610 242,415 Contractual Services 196,686 234,550 214,272 252,860 242,115 248,235 262,015 Utilities 3,199 2,045 2,387 2,500 2,550 2,600 2,630 Repairs&Maintenance 34,157 20,543 17,930 16,270 16,565 20,900 21,650 Training/Travel/Dues 22,669 18,795 20,588 20,240 20,930 27,680 32,215 Other Expenses 1,181 1,203 163 - - - - Vehicle Replacement Fund 202,000 229,370 382,900 340,400 428,000 440,770 453,920 Capital Outlay - 6,450 - 42,500 38,000 30,000 - Total Exp 2,089,304 2,090,262 2,226,102 2,581,625 2,822,970 2,882,470 2,955,190 Net addition to(use of) general revenues (2,089,304) (2,090,262) (2,226,102) (2,581,625) (2,822,970) (2,882,470) (2,955,190) 176 2023 CAPITAL OUTLAY: VERF Charges $ 440,770 Add Mini-Excavator (w/Storm & Cemetery) $ 30,000 $ 470,770 2024 CAPITAL OUTLAY: VERF Charges $ 493,970 $ 493,970 See VERF budget for details of additional Street item replacements City of Apple Valley 177 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) STREET MAINTENANCE 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6110-SALARY-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 957,840 958,682 931,139 1,067,150 1,161,270 540,537 1,201,735 1,201,735 1,264,900 1,264,900 6112-SALARY-SEASONAL TEMP 39,908 27,753 33,067 55,000 42,300 9,810 46,000 46,000 46,200 46,200 6113-OVERTIME-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 39,656 10,493 37,905 38,000 39,000 13,865 39,000 39,000 40,000 40,000 6121-INSURANCE CASH BENEFIT 5,580 5,760 5,760 6,260 6122-COMP REQUEST -30,720 -23,877 -38,989 -10,000 -26,516 -20,000 -30,000 -20,000 -30,000 6123-SALARY-OTHER 49,860 56,940 56,680 56,680 46,065 46,065 6124-OVERTIME-SEASONAL TEMP 290 384 27 0 6105-SALARIES AND WAGES 1,012,555 979,195 968,909 1,210,010 1,289,510 543,957 1,323,415 1,313,415 1,377,165 1,367,165 6138-MEDICARE 14,160 13,341 13,240 16,985 18,845 7,585 19,480 19,480 20,260 20,260 6139-FICA 60,258 56,755 56,611 72,635 80,570 32,560 83,290 83,290 86,625 86,625 6141-PENSIONS-PERA 69,800 69,504 70,069 83,740 94,290 38,440 97,305 97,305 101,320 101,320 6142-WORKERS COMPENSATION 66,117 59,110 73,103 82,415 101,475 39,510 104,685 104,685 114,260 114,260 6144-LONG-TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE 1,959 2,059 1,681 3,220 3,350 756 3,460 3,460 3,605 3,605 6145-MEDICAL INSURANCE 209,730 240,890 225,192 249,000 287,495 91,469 257,040 257,040 287,435 287,435 6146-DENTAL INSURANCE 16,416 16,937 16,812 8,785 6147-LIFE INSURANCE-BASIC 89 92 93 144 6148-LIFE INSURANCE-SUPP/DEPEND 2,246 1,430 2,178 1,086 6170-EMPLOYEE PAID PREMIUMS -33,817 -41,629 -42,812 -26,000 -13,800 -7,118 -14,100 -30,000 -14,100 -40,325 6125-EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 406,958 418,489 416,166 481,995 572,225 213,217 551,160 535,260 599,405 573,180 6100-TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 1,419,513 1,397,684 1,385,074 1,692,005 1,861,735 757,173 1,874,575 1,848,675 1,976,570 1,940,345 6210-OFFICE SUPPLIES 507 211 340 55 6211-SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT 13,317 6,802 14,450 17,670 12,590 4,435 17,500 17,500 9,810 9,810 6212-MOTOR FUELS/OILS 86,559 52,573 63,174 85,600 86,010 38,946 124,900 124,900 108,535 108,535 6213-FERTILIZER 106 0 0 6214-CHEMICALS 3,302 2,627 3,226 4,400 4,450 3,211 5,400 5,400 6,250 6,250 6215-EQUIPMENT-PARTS 50,593 55,765 58,038 50,670 51,100 20,988 51,380 51,380 51,775 51,775 6216-VEHICLES-TIRES/BATTERIES 12,971 12,574 20,454 13,500 13,630 4,735 20,150 20,150 18,670 18,670 6229-GENERAL SUPPLIES 42,650 48,966 43,105 43,010 45,295 10,211 44,280 44,280 47,375 47,375 6205-SUPPLIES 209,899 179,622 202,787 214,850 213,075 82,578 263,610 263,610 242,415 242,415 6235-CONSULTANT SERVICES 1,122 1,521 3,844 1,690 1,700 780 1,710 1,710 1,720 1,720 6237-TELEPHONE/PAGERS 5,038 10,063 9,544 10,220 10,710 5,578 10,800 10,800 10,900 10,900 6238-POSTAGE/UPS/FEDEX 29 0 0 0 0 0 6239-PRINTING 59 423 318 720 740 252 760 560 825 625 6240-CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE 10,498 7,749 9,582 9,710 9,850 2,349 9,925 9,925 10,000 10,000 6249-OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 179,940 214,795 190,985 230,520 219,115 77,370 230,240 225,240 243,770 238,770 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 196,686 234,550 214,272 252,860 242,115 86,329 253,435 248,235 267,215 262,015 6255-UTILITIES-ELECTRIC 603 607 613 870 885 263 900 900 915 915 6257-UTILITIES-PROPANE/WATER/SEWER 2,596 1,438 1,775 1,630 1,665 25 1,700 1,700 1,715 1,715 6250-UTILITIES 3,199 2,045 2,387 2,500 2,550 288 2,600 2,600 2,630 2,630 6265-REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 32,412 20,543 17,660 16,270 16,565 26,311 20,900 20,900 21,650 21,650 6269-REPAIRS-OTHER 1,745 0 270 0 6260-REPAIRS AND MAINTENA 34,157 20,543 17,930 16,270 16,565 26,311 20,900 20,900 21,650 21,650 6275-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL 430 1,095 2,891 2,580 2,625 461 8,760 8,760 12,725 12,725 6277-MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE 2,750 0 0 0 0 0 6280-DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 5,412 6,303 6,266 6,660 6,805 6,416 7,120 7,120 7,490 7,490 6281-UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 14,076 11,397 11,431 11,000 11,500 4,965 11,800 11,800 12,000 12,000 6270-TRNG/TRAVL/DUES/UNIF 22,669 18,795 20,588 20,240 20,930 11,842 27,680 27,680 32,215 32,215 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 466,609 455,555 457,965 506,720 495,235 207,349 568,225 563,025 566,125 560,925 6310-RENTAL EXPENSE 1,200 1,200 230 0 0 0 6333-GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS -19 -12 -67 -28 6399-OTHER CHARGES 0 15 0 0 0 0 City of Apple Valley 178 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) STREET MAINTENANCE 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES 1,181 1,203 163 0 0 -28 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES 1,181 1,203 163 0 0 -28 6740-CAPITAL OUTLAY-MACH/EQ/OTHER 0 6,450 0 42,500 38,000 8,071 30,000 30,000 40,000 0 6745-VERF CHARGES 202,000 229,370 382,900 340,400 428,000 106,167 440,770 440,770 453,920 453,920 6701-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 202,000 235,820 382,900 382,900 466,000 114,238 470,770 470,770 493,920 453,920 6700-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 202,000 235,820 382,900 382,900 466,000 114,238 470,770 470,770 493,920 453,920 2,089,303 2,090,262 2,226,102 2,581,625 2,822,970 1,078,732 2,913,570 2,882,470 3,036,615 2,955,190 179 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 31: STREET MAINTENANCE-1600 Public Works Department COMPANY 1000: GENERAL FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2,024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND SALARIES 6110 Regular Employees 1,067,150 1,161,270 1,217,000.00 1,201,735 1,201,735 1,264,900 1,264,900 6112 Salary-Seasonal Temp 55,000 42,300 40,000 46,000 46,000 46,200 46,200 6113 Overtime-Reg 38,000 39,000 25,000 39,000 39,000 40,000 40,000 6122 Comp Request - (10,000) (10,000.00) (20,000) (30,000) (20,000) (30,000) 6123 Salaries-Other 49,860 56,940 56,940 56,680 56,680 46,065 46,065 6138 Medicare 16,985 18,845 18,845 19,480 19,480 20,260 20,260 6139 FICA 72,635 80,570 80,570 83,290 83,290 86,625 86,625 6141 Pension-PERA 83,740 94,290 94,290 97,305 97,305 101,320 101,320 6142 Worker's Compensation Insurance 82,415 101,475 101,475 104,685 104,685 114,260 114,260 6144 Long-Term Disability Insurance 3,220 3,350 3,350 3,460 3,460 3,605 3,605 6145 Hospital&Life Insurance 249,000 287,495 287,495 257,040 257,040 287,435 287,435 6170 Employee Paid Premiums (26,000) (13,800) (13,800) (14,100) (30,000) (14,100) (40,325) Total 1,692,005 1,861,735 1,901,165 1,874,575 1,848,675 1,976,570 1,940,345 6211 SMALL TOOL&EQUIPMENT Miscellaneous Tools,Toolbox 5,150 5,200 5,200 5,250 5,250 5,300 5,300 Replace Weed Whips 380 390 390 400 400 410 410 Chain Saw Replacement 1,030 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Cutoff Saw Replace 1,500 1,500 Push Lawn Mower - 600 600 Back Pack Blower - - - 400 400 - - Slab Lifter Bucket - - - 3,000 3,000 - - Hand Grinder Replace 430 - - 450 450 - - Fairmont Pole Saw Replace - - - 3,300 3,300 - - Battery Powered Pole Saws - - - 2,500 2,500 - - Replacement iPads for Field Staff(1) - 1,000 1,000 1,200 1,200 1,000 1,000 PreCise to Cartegraph API - 5,000 5,000 - - Turfco T3100 Fertilizer Spreader 10,680 - - - - Total 17,670 12,590 12,590 17,500 17,500 9,810 9,810 6212 MOTOR FUELS/OILS No Lead Fuel 11,400 11,330 12,500 16,400 16,400 14,481 14,481 Diesel Fuel 60,500 64,220 67,000 96,000 96,000 81,354 81,354 Diesel Road Tax 3,600 - 1,300 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Fluids,Coolant&Propane 3,100 3,160 3,160 3,200 3,200 3,300 3,300 Oil 7,000 7,300 7,300 7,300 7,300 7,400 7,400 Total 85,600 86,010 91,260 124,900 124,900 108,535 108,535 6214 CHEMICALS Street Maintenance Products 250 250 250 400 400 1,200 1,200 Weed Killer(from 6229) 4,150 4,200 4,200 5,000 5,000 5,050 5,050 Total 4,400 4,450 4,450 5,400 5,400 6,250 6,250 6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS Mowers/Tractors 4,220 4,300 4,300 4,330 4,330 4,375 4,375 Trucks/Other Vehicles 44,340 44,800 44,800 45,000 45,000 45,300 45,300 Stump Grinder Teeth 2,110 2,000 2,000 2,050 2,050 2,100 2,100 Total 50,670 51,100 51,100 51,380 51,380 51,775 51,775 6216 EQUIPMENT-TIRES/BATTERIES Batteries 2,110 2,130 2,130 2,150 2,150 2,170 2,170 Tires-Vehicles 6,240 6,300 6,300 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Tires-Off Road Tires 5,150 5,200 5,200 8,000 8,000 6,500 6,500 Total 13,500 13,630 13,630 20,150 20,150 18,670 18,670 6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES 3/8"Granite Chips for Pothole Patching 3,500 3,700 3,700 3,900 3,900 4,000 4,000 Bituminous Hot Mix 6,000 6,500 7,500 7,000 7,000 9,000 9,000 Bituminous Cold Mix 1,700 2,630 2,800 2,630 2,630 2,800 2,800 1"Crushed Limestone 1,000 1,000 250 - - - - 1-1/2"Crushed Rock 750 750 250 500 500 500 500 Sod/Black Dirt (Sidewalk Repairs) 5,000 5,500 5,500 6,000 6,000 6,200 6,200 Trees for Ring Route Replacement 3,000 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,700 1,700 Hardware&Supplies 3,170 3,175 3,175 3,200 3,200 3,225 3,225 Mulch and Landscape Supplies-Cedar 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Concrete Sealer-Ring Route&Cedar 7,470 7,470 5,826 6,000 6,000 6,200 6,200 Asphalt Emulsifier 7,260 7,300 7,300 7,450 7,450 7,600 7,600 Safety Equipment(+Chainsaw Boots) 2,390 3,000 3,000 3,100 3,100 3,150 3,150 Ring Route Flag Replacement - 1,000 836 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Grass Seed 770 770 770 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Total 43,010 45,295 43,407 44,280 44,280 47,375 47,375 180 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 31: STREET MAINTENANCE-1600 Public Works Department COMPANY 1000: GENERAL FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2,024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND 6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES Safety(Safety Glasses,hepatitis, 1,690 1,700 1,700 1,710 1,710 1,720 1,720 respirator,hearing&drug testing) Total 1,690 1,700 1,700 1,710 1,710 1,720 1,720 6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS Mobile Phones 2,300 2,550 2,550 2,600 2,600 2,650 2,650 Mobile Air Cards 7,920 8,160 8,160 8,200 8,200 8,250 8,250 Total 10,220 10,710 10,710 10,800 10,800 10,900 10,900 6239 PRINTING/PUBLISHING Work Orders,Advertising,Misc 60 65 - 70 70 70 70 Temp No Parking Signs(4th of July) 430 440 440 450 325 455 330 DOT Safety Inspection Books 230 235 235 240 165 300 225 Total 720 740 675 760 560 825 625 6240 C.SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVAL Landfill Dumping Fee(SET,rolloff dump, 7,390 7,500 7,500 7,525 7,525 7,550 7,550 road kill,stump grindings-disposal) - - - - - - - Leaves-disposal 2,320 2,350 2,350 2,400 2,400 2,450 2,450 Total 9,710 9,850 9,850 9,925 9,925 10,000 10,000 6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES Curb,Gutter,Sidewalk Replace/Mud Jack 55,000 55,000 60,000 70,000 70,000 72,000 72,000 STS Crews 15,310 15,400 15,400 15,600 15,600 15,800 15,800 Ring Route Painting 60,180 55,000 45,252 50,500 50,500 55,000 55,000 Colored Concrete Sealing-Ring Route 12,670 12,000 9,990 12,100 12,100 12,000 12,000 Colored Concrete Sealing-Cedar Ave 12,670 12,000 9,990 12,100 12,100 12,000 12,000 Cedar Avenue Irrigation System Maintenance 7,390 7,400 6,000 7,420 7,420 7,440 7,440 RR Misc.(Masonry,Trees,Sidewalks) 5,280 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Repair&Resurface Pathways 30,900 31,000 32,108 31,100 31,100 33,000 33,000 Boulevard Weed Spraying 5,810 6,000 6,000 6,100 6,100 6,200 6,200 800 mHz Radios 310 315 1,000 320 320 330 330 Tree trimming,removal,stump grinding 25,000 20,000 25,826 20,000 20,000 25,000 25,000 Reduction to trend - - - (5,000) (5,000) Total 230,520 219,115 216,566 230,240 225,240 243,770 238,770 6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC Galaxie Sprinklers 420 430 430 435 435 440 440 Cedar Avenue 100 100 100 105 105 110 110 Gallavant Sprinklers 350 355 355 360 360 365 365 Total 870 885 885 900 900 915 915 6257 UTILITIES-WATER/SEWER Gallavant/Galaxie Sprinklers 330 340 340 350 350 355 355 Cedar Avenue 1,300 1,325 1,325 1,350 1,350 1,360 1,360 Total 1,630 1,665 1,665 1,700 1,700 1,715 1,715 6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT Heavy Equipment 10,920 11,100 11,100 12,100 12,100 12,600 12,600 2-Way Radios,Pagers 1,000 1,030 1,030 1,050 1,050 1,200 1,200 Paint/Repair Truck frame/box 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,250 2,250 2,000 2,000 Stepp Asphalt Patcher Tune-Up 3,000 3,500 3,500 3,750 3,750 3 Bucket Truck Annual Inspections 1,850 1,935 1,935 2,000 2,000 2,100 2,100 Total 16,270 16,565 19,565 20,900 20,900 21,650 21,650 6275 SCHOOLS/CONF/EXP-LOCAL MN APWA/T2/Snow Plow Seminar 660 675 675 700 700 725 725 Supervisor Training 340 350 350 360 360 1,000 1,000 Misc.LTAP,etc Seminars/Classes 1,580 1,600 1,600 1,700 1,700 5,000 5,000 Training For New CDL Operators - - - 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 Total 2,580 2,625 2,625 8,760 8,760 12,725 12,725 6280 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS Superintendent Assoc.&Subscription 440 400 - 410 410 420 420 APWA Dues 440 450 460 460 460 470 470 Cartegraph On-line Licenses 5,780 5,955 5,955 6,250 6,250 6,600 6,600 Total 6,660 6,805 6,415 7,120 7,120 7,490 7,490 6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE Uniforms&Boots 11,000 11,500 11,500 11,800 11,800 12,000 12,000 Total 11,000 11,500 11,500 11,800 11,800 12,000 12,000 181 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 31: STREET MAINTENANCE-1600 Public Works Department COMPANY 1000: GENERAL FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2,024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND 6730 CAPITAL OUTLAY-VEHICLES Replace Single Axle 300 Plow$330,00 VERF VERF Replace Single Axle 322 Plow,$240,000 VERF VERF Replace 3/4 Ton Chevy#331$45,000 VERF VERF Replace 3/4 Ton Chevy#341$45,000 VERF VERF Replace Single Axle 301 Plow$250,000 - VERF VERF Replace 3/4 Ton Chevy#337$45,000 VERF VERF Annual Replacement Charge for Tool Cat#346$10,000 VERF VERF VERF Annual Replacement Charge for Tool Cat#347$10,000 VERF VERF VERF Replace Air Compressor#302$18,900 I VERF VERF Replace Replace Dura Patcher#354$105,100 VERF VERF Replace Single Axle 305 Plow$240,000 VERF VERF Replace Daewood Forklift-$31,500 VERF VERF Replace Dura Patch Unit-$105,100 VERF VERF Replace Aebi Tractor w/Track Skid Steer#334-$160,000 VERF 61,795 Replace JD Mower#335-$38,800 VERF VERF Replace JD Mower#349-$38,800 VERF VERF Total - - 61,795 - - - 6740 CAPITAL OUTLAY-OTHER ITEMS Add Anti-Ice Unit for#340 - Add Concrete Repair Trailer 15,000 15,000 Add Screener Bucket 17,500 Add Blacktop Roller-$17,000 17,000 Add Mini-Excavator(with Storm and Cemetery) 30,000 30,000 Add Roller Trailer 8,000 6,144 - - Replace Vermeer Chipper 309-$80,000 Upgrade AccuBrine Machine$69,815 In Muni Bldg Replace Chipper#342-$80,000 VERF Replace Skid Steer Trailer 8,000 Add Crash Attenuator 15,000 - 40,000 VERF Total 42,500 38,000 21,144 30,000 30,000 40,000 - 6745 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT VERF-Vehicle Repl.Charges 340,400 428,000 428,000 440,770 440,770 453,920 453,920 VEHICLE-Fleet Addition Pick Up-Superintendent/Supervisor Total 340,400 428,000 428,000 440,770 440,770 453,920 453,920 Total Net of Personnel 889,620 961,235 1,009,532 1,038,995 1,033,795 1,060,045 1,014,845 TOTAL EXPENSES 2,581,625 2,822,970 2,910,697 2,913,570 2,882,470 3,036,615 2,955,190 182 ••• •••• ••••• ••• AppValley Notes: 183 COMPANY DEPARTMENT BUSINESS UNIT ACTIVITY 1000 32 1660 & 1665 SNOW AND ICE REMOVAL Public Works DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY This subsection of the Public Works Streets Division provides for snow plowing and ice control along the public street system. The budget includes funds for overtime expenses when plowing is conducted after hours or weekends. Road salt and ice control materials are also funded through this business unit. The City purchases road salt materials through the cooperative purchasing program administered by the State of Minnesota. SERVICE CATEGORIES The Public Works Street Maintenance Division provides the following winter road maintenance services for the City of Apple Valley. 1. Snow Plowing Services ■ Conduct snow plowing response to winter storms for 430 lane miles of the City public street system in the most efficient process possible with available resources ■ Provide trained operators to simultaneously deploy equipment within 14 plow districts within the City for winter storm events ■ Maintain plowing vehicle fleet consisting of 2 tandem axel trucks, 10 single axel plow trucks, two large loaders, two midsized loaders, four tractors, four pick-up trucks with plows, and four versatile tractors. 2. Snow Removal and Hauling Services ■ Remove excess snow accumulations at intersections to maintain safe sightlines for vehicle traffic ■ Remove excess snow from storage from City facilities and along collector roadways to the extent feasible with available resources ■ Maintain snow loading equipment and use contract truck hauling to transport excess snow material, if needed. 3. Ice Control Services ■ Maintain adequate road salt inventories to provide deicing of public roadways ■ Conduct advanced deicing strategies, including ground speed sensing of salt spreaders, pre-wetting brine injection on all salt trucks, and on-site mixing of specialized brine solutions for road salt wetting liquids ■ Provide anti-icing treatment along selected roadways to preempt ice formation and reduce overall salt usage 184 MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2023 In addition to recurring annual duties, the Public Works Department continues development of the anti-icing program. An anti-icing program involves pretreatment of streets prior to major snow and ice storm events to proactively inhibit the bonding of ice onto the surface of streets. Anti-icing activities result in an overall reduction in the total salt usage, which translates into cost savings for the City and reduced impacts to the environment. In 2023, Streets will be utilizing Apex-C, blended with salt brine in different ratios for pre-wetting salt at the spinners on trucks. Historically, two chemicals were used to accomplish this. In an effort to increase efficiency for crews, increase road safety, and reduce salt usage and money, this new process will be a positive change for Public Works. MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2024 In 2024, staff will continue to provide cost effective snow and ice control for the City. Staff will build on the expected positive results of the anti-icing program began in the previous years. This program involves the pretreatment of streets prior to major snow and ice storm events to proactively inhibit the bonding of ice onto the surface of streets. Anti-icing activities result in an overall reduction in the total salt usage, which translates into cost savings for the City and reduced impacts to the environment. If positive results are observed, additional use of all liquid solutions will be expanded to other routes. Management will continue to re-align routes to further increase efficiencies and reduce completion times for snow and ice events. IMPACT MEASURES / PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual Actual Actual Projected Projected Projected Item 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Number of Lane Miles 429 429 429 430 430 430 Maintained Number of Snow/Ice 30 28 25 40 40 40 Events per Year Tons of Salt Material Used 2,058 1327 1830 2500 2500 2300 Untreated Road Salt 650 703 709 1200 1200 1200 Clear Lane Road Salt 1408 624 1121 1300 1300 1300 185 Summary Budget Department 32 Snow&Ice Removal(Overtime) 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Expenditures: Salaries&Wages 231,150 134,389 108,717 129,800 133,000 135,000 135,000 Employee Benefits 41,823 25,006 20,848 30,530 31,360 31,835 32,400 Supplies 271,529 185,934 169,242 234,016 234,113 257,100 271,175 Contractual Services 13,133 8,255 13,865 16,360 12,000 12,350 16,300 Training/Travel/Dues 1,864 3,199 1,600 1,900 2,050 2,200 2,250 Total Exp 559,499 356,783 314,272 412,606 412,523 438,485 457,125 Net addition to(use of) general revenues (559,499) (356,783) (314,272) (412,606) (412,523) (438,485) (457,125) 2023 Capital Outlay: See VERF - Streets 2024 Capital Outlay: See VERF - Streets City of Apple Valley 186 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) SNOW&ICE REMOVAL 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6110-SALARY-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 829 199 2,035 2,208 6112-SALARY-SEASONAL TEMP 31 68 0 0 6113-OVERTIME-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 234,012 134,122 106,681 129,800 133,000 71,428 135,000 135,000 135,000 135,000 6122-COMP REQUEST -4,274 0 0 0 6124-OVERTIME-SEASONAL TEMP 551 0 0 0 6105-SALARIES AND WAGES 231,150 134,389 108,717 129,800 133,000 73,636 135,000 135,000 135,000 135,000 6138-MEDICARE 3,272 1,904 1,531 1,880 1,930 1,043 1,960 1,960 1,960 1,960 6139-FICA 13,990 8,142 6,546 8,050 8,245 4,333 8,370 8,370 8,370 8,370 6141-PENSIONS-PERA 17,292 10,074 8,071 9,735 9,975 5,523 10,125 10,125 10,125 10,125 6142-WORKERS COMPENSATION 7,269 4,886 4,699 10,865 11,210 3,043 11,380 11,380 11,945 11,945 6125-EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 41,823 25,006 20,848 30,530 31,360 13,942 31,835 31,835 32,400 32,400 6100-TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 272,973 159,395 129,564 160,330 164,360 87,578 166,835 166,835 167,400 167,400 6211-SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT 0 539 0 0 6215-EQUIPMENT-PARTS 12,525 28,645 31,395 26,020 31,966 16,783 32,100 32,100 32,175 32,175 6229-GENERAL SUPPLIES 259,004 156,749 137,846 207,996 202,147 146,215 225,000 225,000 239,000 239,000 6205-SUPPLIES 271,529 185,934 169,242 234,016 234,113 162,998 257,100 257,100 271,175 271,175 6249-OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 13,133 8,255 13,865 16,360 12,000 4,000 12,350 12,350 16,300 16,300 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 13,133 8,255 13,865 16,360 12,000 4,000 12,350 12,350 16,300 16,300 6275-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXPLOCAL 1,840 3,200 1,600 1,900 2,050 0 2,200 2,200 2,250 2,250 6277-MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE 24 0 0 0 0 0 6270-TRNG/TRAVL/DUES/UNIF 1,864 3,200 1,600 1,900 2,050 0 2,200 2,200 2,250 2,250 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 286,526 197,389 184,707 252,276 248,163 166,998 271,650 271,650 289,725 289,725 6333-GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS 0 -1 0 0 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES 0 -1 0 0 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES 0 -1 0 0 6740-CAPITAL OUTLAY-MACH/EQ/OTHER 0 0 6701-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 0 0 6700-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 0 0 559,499 356,783 314,271 412,606 412,523 254,576 438,485 438,485 457,125 457,125 187 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 32: SNOW&ICE REMOVAL-1660&1665 Public Works Department COMPANY 1000: GENERAL FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND SALARIES 6113 Overtime-Regular 129,800 133,000 90,000 135,000 135,000 135,000 135,000 6138 Medicare 1,880 1,930 1,930 1,960 1,960 1,960 1,960 6139 FICA 8,050 8,245 8,245 8,370 8,370 8,370 8,370 6141 Pension-PERA 9,735 9,975 9,975 10,125 10,125 10,125 10,125 6142 Work Comp Insurance 10,865 11,210 11,210 11,380 11,380 11,945 11,945 6144 Long-Term Disability Insurance - - - - - Total 160,330 164,360 121,360 166,835 166,835 167,400 167,400 6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS Tire Chains 2,160 2,225 2,225 2,300 2,300 2,375 2,375 Plow Cutting Edges 22,170 28,000 23,000 28,000 28,000 28,000 28,000 Backup Alarms/Light Bars 1,690 1,741 1,700 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 Total 26,020 31,966 26,925 32,100 32,100 32,175 32,175 6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES Salt,Ice Control 95,805 93,000 90,000 99,000 99,000 105,000 105,000 less offsetting revenue from salt sale to lSD 196 (14,420) (14,853) (35,938) (16,000) (16,000) (20,000) (20,000) Clear Lane 116,051 113,000 113,000 135,000 135,000 145,000 145,000 Anti-Icing Additives 10,560 11,000 12,181 7,000 7,000 9,000 9,000 Total 207,996 202,147 179,243 225,000 225,000 239,000 239,000 6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES Contract Snow Removal Equipment 1,060 1,080 - 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 Plow Damage Sod Repairs 4,220 4,300 7,500 4,350 4,350 8,000 8,000 Trucking 4,590 - - - - - - Precise Mobile Air Time(GPS) 6,490 6,620 6,620 6,900 6,900 7,200 7,200 Total 16,360 12,000 14,120 12,350 12,350 16,300 16,300 6275 SCHOOL/CONF/EXP-LOCAL Snow Removal School-DCTC 1,900 2,050 2,050 2,200 2,200 2,250 2,250 Total 1,900 2,050 2,050 2,200 2,200 2,250 2,250 6277 MILEAGE Snow&Ice Monitoring - - - - - Total - - - - - - - Total Net of Personnel 252,276 248,163 222,338 271,650 271,650 289,725 289,725 TOTAL EXPENSES 412,606 412,523 $ 343,698 $ 438,485 $ 438,485 $ 457,125 $ 457,125 188 ••• •••• ••••• ••• AppValley Notes: 189 COMPANY DEPARTMENT BUSINESS UNIT ACTIVITY 1000 33 1680 TRAFFIC SIGNS/ SIGNALS/ MARKERS Public Works DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY This subsection of the Public Works Street Maintenance Division provides for the maintenance of all signs, pavement markings and traffic signals located within the City street right-of-way. SERVICE CATEGORIES Maintenance for the City's traffic signs along public roadways, traffic control signal systems and pavement markings include the following services provided by Public Works Department staff using city-owned equipment, contractual services from private companies and inter-agency resources through joint powers agreements. 1. Traffic Sign Maintenance Services ■ Supply and maintain approximately 6380 traffic control and street name signs throughout the City using public works staff and equipment ■ Inventory and monitor sign conditions using sign management software ■ Perform routine sign replacement to maintain Federal and State retro-reflectivity standards for traffic signs in accordance with adopted City policy ■ Replace damaged signs and knock-downs 2. Traffic Signal System Maintenance Services ■ Provide maintenance for 12 city-owned traffic control signal systems through a Joint Powers Agreement with Dakota County, including signal programing, re-lamping, and minor electrical repairs ■ Contract for major electrical and equipment repair work for city-owned traffic control signal systems through a standing service contract with a private contractor ■ Respond to signal damage incidents and address questions regarding the operation of city-owned traffic control signal systems 3. Pavement Marking Maintenance Services ■ Inventory and monitor the condition of pavement markings on public streets in accordance with pending Federal and State standards ■ Provide for the repainting of all pavement markings annually to maintain compliance with standards 190 MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2023 In addition to recurring annual duties, the Public Works Department continues to develop the street sign management program to achieve compliance with Federal mandates for sign retro-reflectivity requirements. Retro-reflectivity is a term that refers to the amount of light reflected from vehicle headlights back toward the vehicle and the driver's eyes, making the signs appear brighter and easier to see at night. Road authorities must establish and implement a sign assessment or management method that will maintain minimum levels of sign retro-reflectivity. Currently, in conjunction with the annual street improvement program, all signs within the annual project areas are evaluated and upgraded to comply with the retro-reflectivity standard. Additionally, staff will continue to locate via GPS all newly installed signs. This data is then used within both our GIS and Asset Management programs. MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2024 In addition to recurring annual duties, staff plans to continue the use of Cartegraph, the asset management system, for field use. This will include utilizing Cartegraph for all in- field work tasks related to signs. Examples include: sign replacements, sign knock-downs and new sign installations. Of course, staff will continue to locate via GPS all newly installed signs. IMPACT MEASURES / PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual Actual Actual Proposed Proposed Proposed Item 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Number of Street Signs 6385 6377 6400 6400 6400 6400 Number of Signs 517 398 490 520 520 520 Replaced Markings Repainted (ft) 735,000 1,054,550 950,000 900,000 1,000,000 1,050,000 STAFFING Regular Status Personnel Schedule— FTE's Adopted Adopted Actual Actual Proposed Proposed Position Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Technical Specialist 1 1 1 1 1 1 Existing position from Streets Division 1600 Temporary Status Personnel Schedule - Hours Adopted Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Position Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 None 191 Summary Budget Department 33-Traffic Signs/Signals/Markers 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Expenditures: Salaries&Wages 60,678 70,082 53,402 70,970 72,405 80,120 82,490 Employee Benefits 13,571 15,694 12,327 14,895 17,270 19,115 20,025 Supplies 34,243 29,461 21,451 42,420 43,505 34,420 36,280 Contractual Services 89,793 90,112 104,362 95,510 118,900 119,500 140,600 Repairs&Maintenance 1,092 - 676 1,060 250 300 310 Training/Travel/Dues 4,146 4,515 4,624 4,625 4,765 5,010 5,300 Other Expenses (9) - 264 - - - - Capital Outlay 7,890 - - - - - Total Exp 211,405 209,863 F 197,106 229,479 257,095 258,465 285,005 Net addition to(use of) general revenues (211,405) (209,863) (197,106) (229,479) (257,095) (258,465) (285,005) Capital Outlay 2023: None Capital Outlay 2024: None City of Apple Valley 192 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) TRAFFIC SIGNS/SIGNALS/MARKERS 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6110-SALARY-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 60,628 69,969 53,296 68,950 70,305 13,988 77,835 77,835 80,140 80,140 6112-SALARY-SEASONAL TEMP 50 112 106 0 6123-SALARY-OTHER 2,020 2,100 2,285 2,285 2,350 2,350 6105-SALARIES AND WAGES 60,678 70,082 53,402 70,970 72,405 13,988 80,120 80,120 82,490 82,490 6138-MEDICARE 863 1,000 731 1,030 1,050 190 1,160 1,160 1,200 1,200 6139-FICA 3,689 4,275 3,126 4,400 4,490 811 4,970 4,970 5,115 5,115 6141-PENSIONS-PERA 4,547 5,248 3,997 4,325 5,430 1,049 6,010 6,010 6,185 6,185 6142-WORKERS COMPENSATION 4,472 5,172 4,474 4,940 6,100 1,194 6,755 6,755 7,300 7,300 6144-LONG-TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE 200 200 220 220 225 225 6125-EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 13,571 15,694 12,327 14,895 17,270 3,244 19,115 19,115 20,025 20,025 6100-TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 74,250 85,776 65,729 85,865 89,675 17,232 99,235 99,235 102,515 102,515 6211-SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT 757 0 0 1,820 1,630 560 1,500 1,500 600 600 6212-MOTOR FUELS/OILS 1,970 1,317 1,640 2,000 2,530 741 3,400 3,400 2,950 2,950 6215-EQUIPMENT-PARTS 1,136 285 846 1,880 1,620 -775 1,670 1,670 1,730 1,730 6229-GENERAL SUPPLIES 30,380 27,859 18,965 36,720 37,725 14,336 37,850 27,850 41,000 31,000 6205-SUPPLIES 34,243 29,461 21,451 42,420 43,505 14,861 44,420 34,420 46,280 36,280 6237-TELEPHONE/PAGERS 16 0 0 6239-PRINTING 368 0 0 0 0 0 6249-OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 89,425 90,096 104,362 95,510 118,900 5,155 119,500 119,500 140,600 140,600 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 89,793 90,112 104,362 95,510 118,900 5,155 119,500 119,500 140,600 140,600 6265-REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 454 0 0 1,060 250 0 300 300 310 310 6269-REPAIRS-OTHER 638 0 676 0 6260-REPAIRS AND MAINTENA 1,092 0 676 1,060 250 0 300 300 310 310 6280-DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 4,146 4,515 4,624 4,625 4,765 4,763 5,010 5,010 5,300 5,300 6270-TRNG/TRAVL/DUES/UNIF 4,146 4,515 4,624 4,625 4,765 4,763 5,010 5,010 5,300 5,300 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 129,274 124,087 131,113 143,615 167,420 24,779 169,230 159,230 192,490 182,490 6310-RENTAL EXPENSE 0 0 266 0 0 0 6333-GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS -9 0 -2 0 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES -9 0 264 0 0 0 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES -9 0 264 0 0 0 6740-CAPITAL OUTLAY-MACH/EQ/OTHER 7,890 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24,000 0 6701-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 7,890 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24,000 0 6700-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 7,890 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24,000 0 211,405 209,863 197,106 229,480 257,095 42,011 268,465 258,465 319,005 285,005 193 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 33: TRAFFIC SIGNS/SIGNALS/MARKERS-1680 Public Works Department COMPANY 1000: GENERAL FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND SALARIES 6110 Regular Employees 68,950 70,305 70,305 77,835 77,835 80,140 80,140 6123 Salaries-Other 2,020 2,100 2,100 2,285 2,285 2,350 2,350 6138 Medicare 1,030 1,050 1,050 1,160 1,160 1,200 1,200 6139 FICA 4,400 4,490 4,490 4,970 4,970 5,115 5,115 6141 Pension-PERA 4,325 5,430 5,430 6,010 6,010 6,185 6,185 6142 Worker's Compensation 4,940 6,100 6,100 6,755 6,755 7,300 7,300 6144 Long-Term Disability Insurance 200 200 200 220 220 225 225 6145 Hospital&Life Insurance - - - - - Total 85,865 89,675 89,675 99,235 99,235 102,515 102,515 6211 SMALL TOOLS Sign Post Puller - 800 800 - - - Replace Power Tool on Sign Truck 1,500 - - 1,000 1,000 - - Hammer Drill - 500 500 - - - - General Tools for Sign Install-Replace 320 330 330 500 500 600 600 Total 1,820 1,630 1,630 1,500 1,500 600 600 6212 MOTOR FUELS/OILS Diesel-Unit 338 2,000 1,930 2,200 2,800 2,800 2,400 2,400 Oil - 325 325 325 325 350 350 Diesel Road Tax - 275 275 275 275 200 200 Total 2,000 2,530 2,800 3,400 3,400 2,950 2,950 6215 EQUIPMENT PARTS Vehicle Parts-Unit 338 450 460 460 470 470 480 480 Signal Parts,Circuit Bds,Loop Detectors 1,430 1,160 1,160 1,200 1,200 1,250 1,250 Total 1,880 1,620 1,620 1,670 1,670 1,730 1,730 6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES Crosswalk Striping Paint 3,090 4,050 4,050 5,000 5,000 5,050 5,050 Street Name Plate Replacement 7,420 7,500 5,864 7,550 7,550 7,600 7,600 Post-Traffic Signs 6,180 6,200 5,678 6,250 6,250 9,000 9,000 Bracket&Miscellaneous Hardware 1,750 1,775 1,775 1,800 1,800 2,000 2,000 Traffic Control Signs 7,210 7,300 5,216 7,350 7,350 7,400 7,400 Project Signs,Brackets,Posts Replace 6,490 6,300 6,300 6,400 6,400 6,450 6,450 Replace Counter Batteries 1,340 1,350 - - - - - Traffic Cones and Temp Traffic Control 740 750 750 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Advanced Warning Traffic Devices 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 Reduce to Trend (10,000) (10,000) Total 36,720 37,725 32,133 37,850 27,850 41,000 31,000 6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES Street Striping-JPA 63,000 85,000 80,000 85,000 85,000 95,000 95,000 Signal Maintenance-Dakota Cty Agrmnt 21,110 21,900 21,900 22,500 22,500 23,600 23,600 Semaphore Painting(2 per year) 11,400 12,000 10,350 12,000 12,000 22,000 22,000 Total 95,510 118,900 112,250 119,500 119,500 140,600 140,600 6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT Sprayer Rebuild - 250 250 300 300 310 310 Traffic Counters 1,060 - - - - - - Total 1,060 250 250 300 300 310 310 6280 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS Cartegraph On-line Licenses 4,625 4,765 4,765 5,010 5,010 5,300 5,300 Total 4,625 4,765 4,765 5,010 5,010 5,300 5,300 6740 CAPITAL OUTLAY-OTHER ITEMS Driver Feedback Sign Replacements - - - - - 12,000 - Traffic Counters - - - - - 12,000 - Total - - - - - 24,000 - Total Net of Personnel 143,615 167,420 155,448 169,230 159,230 216,490 182,490 TOTAL EXPENSES 229,480 257,095 245,123 268,465 258,465 319,005 285,005 194 ••• •••• ••••• ••• AppValley Notes: 195 COMPANY DEPARTMENT BUSINESS UNIT ACTIVITY 1000 37 1700 Park/Recreation Administration DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY Expenses related to most full-time Parks & Recreation administrative staff members, along with expenses that are accounted as administrative. MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2023 & 2024 • By the 4th quarter of 2022, develop master plans for Alimagnet, Farquar, Kelley, and Redwood parks and have updated recreational facility concept plans for the Apple Valley Community Center, Apple Valley Senior Center, the Apple Valley Family Aquatics Center, and both arenas. Using this information engage the public about the needs of the entire parks system so that in the 1st quarter of 2023 we can order a professionally administered statistically accurate public opinion survey that will seek residents input about what a parks bond referendum may include, what taxpayers threshold for a tax increase may be, and how to move forward towards a November 2023 referendum. The size of the referendum is expected to be between $20 - $40 million. • By the 1st quarter of 2023, develop a written department marketing plan that will provide guidance for department staff in marketing our parks, trails, recreation programs, Senior Center, Arenas, Aquatic Center, Community Center, and Valleywood Golf Course. • By the 2"d quarter of 2023, develop a sign master plan for the park system to include Park ID signs, informational, directional, and regulatory signage. This plan will showcase an updated brand the City will use to promote our parks and can be implemented with the proceeds of a successful parks bond referendum. • By the 2nd quarter of 2023, develop a marketing brochure for our rental facilities located at the Apple Valley Senior Center, Apple Valley Community Center, Valleywood Golf Course, and our park shelters. 196 IMPACT MEASURES / PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual I Actual 1 Actual i Projected I Projected I Projected 2019 ' 2020 1 2021 1 2022 I 2023 I 2024 Support Community Celebrations: Freedom Days 1 ✓ 1 1 ✓ 1 ✓ 1 ✓ ✓ Mid-Winter Fest ? ✓ 1 ✓ 1 ✓ 1 ✓ i ✓ i ✓ • Arts Foundation Music in the Park I ✓ I I ✓ 1 ✓ I ✓ ✓ Winter Concert Series at 1 ✓ Valleywood • Fall Festival ✓ I ✓ Support Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee: • Number of public meetings I 6 1 6 l 11 l 12 1 12 I 12 Support of local Civic Organizations: Valle y Athletic Association ✓ ✓ i ✓ ✓ I ✓ i ✓ • Eastview Athletic Association 1 ✓ I ✓ 1 ✓ 1 ✓ 1 ✓ I ✓ Apple Valley Hockey Association 1 ✓ i I 1 ✓ 1 I 1 I 1 I Eastview Hockey Association ...............:......................_ ............._= ✓ .................. .... BoyScouts/ Girl Scouts ..................................................... I i ✓ i I i I 1 ✓ i ✓ Rotary Club I I I ✓ I I I 1 ✓ i I Chamber of Commerce 1 I 1 I I 1 ✓ i I I I Benefit Employees Years of Service I 694 747 680 I 621 I 529 I 429 Regular Status Personnel Schedule —FTE's Actual Actual Actual Proposed Proposed Proposed Position Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Parks & Rec Director 1 1 1 1 1 1 Recreation Manager 1 1 1 1 1 1 Recreation Supervisor II 3 3 3 3 3 3 Administrative Coordinator 1 1 1 1 1 1 Department Specialist 1 1 1 1.2 1.2 1.2 Custodian .7 .7 .7 .7 .7 .7 Total 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.9 7.9 7.9 Temporary Status Personnel Schedule — (Part-Time hours) Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Proposed Position Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Seasonal 1,560 1,560 1,500 - - - Total 1,560 1,560 1,500 197 Summary Budget Department 37-ParklRecreation Administration 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Expenditures: Salaries&Wages 651,599 636,207 710,829 654,020 721,610 736,780 764,165 Employee Benefits 185,994 176,874 206,128 202,940 201,630 210,355 223,400 Supplies 3,532 3,485 3,437 8,400 2,400 2,400 1,800 Contractual Services 61,062 53,298 50,361 70,935 36,335 24,800 25,500 Repairs&Maintenance 3,437 1,844 1,782 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Training/Travel/Dues 12,735 2,946 9,205 13,650 13,400 11,000 11,000 Other Expenses 62,599 42,784 70,771 64,600 64,000 66,000 67,000 Capital Outlay 1,776 - - - - - Miscellaneous - - - - - Total Exp 982,734 917,437 1,052,512 1,019,545 1,044,375 1,056,335 1,097,865 Net addition(use)of general (982,734) (917,437) (1,052,512) (1,019,545) (1,044,375) (1,056,335) (1,097,865) revenues 2023 CAPITAL OUTLAY None 2024 CAPITAL OUTLAY None City of Apple Valley 198 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) PARK/RECREATION ADMINISTRATION 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6110-SALARY-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 569,436 558,267 629,291 545,040 612,945 239,500 620,850 620,850 644,545 644,545 6111-SALARY PART-TIME 79,053 74,843 76,473 84,280 86,450 40,511 90,795 90,795 94,570 94,570 6112-SALARY-SEASONAL TEMP 257 0 997 0 6113-OVERTIME-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 1,233 877 1,591 1,200 1,200 649 1,200 1,200 1,235 1,235 6119-ANNUAL LEAVE 0 257 644 6121-INSURANCE CASH BENEFIT 1,620 2,220 2,220 1,080 6123-SALARY-OTHER 23,500 21,015 23,935 23,935 23,815 23,815 6105-SALARIES AND WAGES 651,599 636,207 710,829 654,020 721,610 282,384 736,780 736,780 764,165 764,165 6138-MEDICARE 9,214 8,992 10,039 9,485 10,460 3,992 10,685 10,685 11,080 11,080 6139-FICA 39,399 38,329 42,926 40,550 43,815 17,070 44,650 44,650 46,040 46,040 6141-PENSIONS-PERA 48,700 47,149 52,759 49,055 54,120 21,098 55,260 55,260 57,315 57,315 6142-WORKERS COMPENSATION 5,242 5,568 10,522 14,165 11,475 4,591 12,790 12,790 16,290 16,290 6144-LONG-TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE 1,149 1,076 1,022 1,555 1,735 357 1,765 1,765 1,830 1,830 6145-MEDICAL INSURANCE 88,275 79,911 94,316 96,730 89,925 29,783 95,305 95,305 100,945 100,945 6146-DENTAL INSURANCE 6,499 6,953 7,650 2,695 6147-LIFE INSURANCE-BASIC 36 34 39 47 6148-LIFE INSURANCE-SUPP/DEPEND 495 142 4,701 1,890 6170-EMPLOYEE PAID PREMIUMS -13,017 -11,282 -17,846 -8,600 -9,900 -2,288 -10,100 -10,100 -10,100 -10,100 6125-EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 185,994 176,874 206,128 202,940 201,630 79,234 210,355 210,355 223,400 223,400 6100-TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 837,593 813,081 916,956 856,960 923,240 361,617 947,135 947,135 987,565 987,565 6210-OFFICE SUPPLIES 1,068 3,191 961 1,800 1,800 1,248 1,800 1,800 1,200 1,200 6211-SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT 0 -17 0 50 50 0 50 50 50 50 6215-EQUIPMENT-PARTS 0 0 0 50 50 0 50 50 50 50 6229-GENERAL SUPPLIES 2,464 311 2,476 6,500 500 417 500 500 500 500 6205-SUPPLIES 3,532 3,485 3,437 8,400 2,400 1,665 2,400 2,400 1,800 1,800 6235-CONSULTANT SERVICES 15,523 2,588 3,886 13,000 7,000 16,280 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 6237-TELEPHONE/PAGERS 8,128 10,838 9,718 8,000 10,500 4,185 10,500 10,500 12,500 12,400 6238-POSTAGE/UPS/FEDEX 12,150 15,960 12,449 14,000 1,000 4,309 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6239-PRINTING 25,163 23,912 23,938 35,000 17,500 1,360 5,000 5,000 4,000 4,000 6249-OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 99 0 370 935 335 0 1,335 1,300 1,135 1,100 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 61,062 53,298 50,361 70,935 36,335 26,134 24,835 24,800 25,635 25,500 6265-REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 3,437 1,844 1,782 5,000 5,000 1,088 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 6260-REPAIRS AND MAINTENA 3,437 1,844 1,782 5,000 5,000 1,088 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 6275-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL 1,742 950 1,676 2,000 1,750 333 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 6276-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP OTHER 1,342 0 1,752 2,000 2,000 0 2,000 1,950 2,000 1,950 6277-MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE 4,472 1,227 1,480 5,000 5,000 273 5,000 3,000 5,000 3,000 6278-SUBSISTENCE ALLOWANCE 150 0 200 250 250 0 250 250 250 250 6280-DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 4,739 727 3,931 3,700 3,700 4,134 3,700 3,700 3,700 3,700 6281-UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 290 42 166 700 700 393 700 350 700 350 6270-TRNG/TRAVL/DUES/UNIF 12,735 2,946 9,205 13,650 13,400 5,132 13,400 11,000 13,400 11,000 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 80,766 61,572 64,786 97,985 57,135 34,020 45,635 43,200 45,835 43,300 6310-RENTAL EXPENSE 4,509 3,468 3,468 4,100 3,500 1,995 4,100 4,100 4,100 4,100 6333-GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS -1 0 -1 0 6351-VISA/BANK CHARGES 0 0 0 0 0 0 6355-ONLINE REGISTRATION FEES 23,076 39,316 30,355 25,000 25,000 0 29,800 29,800 29,800 29,800 6399-OTHER CHARGES 35,015 0 36,950 35,500 35,500 35,000 40,500 32,100 40,500 33,100 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES 62,599 42,784 70,771 64,600 64,000 36,995 74,400 66,000 74,400 67,000 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES 62,599 42,784 70,771 64,600 64,000 36,995 74,400 66,000 74,400 67,000 6401-EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 6400-TOTAL EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 City of Apple Valley 199 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) PARK/RECREATION ADMINISTRATION 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6735-CAPITAL OUTLAY-OTHER IMPROVEME 1,776 0 0 0 6740-CAPITAL OUTLAY-MACH/EQ/OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 6701-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,776 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6700-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,776 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 982,734 917,437 1,052,513 1,019,545 1,044,375 432,632 1,067,170 1,056,335 1,107,800 1,097,865 200 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 37: PARK/RECREATION ADMINISTRATION-1700 COMPANY 1000: GENERAL FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND SALARIES 6110 Regular Employees 545,040 612,945 612,945 620,850 620,850 644,545 644,545 6111 Salary-Parttime 84,280 86,450 86,450 90,795 90,795 94,570 94,570 6113 Overtime-Reg 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,235 1,235 6123 Salaries-Other 23,500 21,015 21,015 23,935 23,935 23,815 23,815 6138 Medicare 9,485 10,460 10,460 10,685 10,685 11,080 11,080 6139 FICA 40,550 43,815 43,815 44,650 44,650 46,040 46,040 6141 Pension-PERA 49,055 54,120 54,120 55,260 55,260 57,315 57,315 6142 Work Comp Ins 14,165 11,475 11,475 12,790 12,790 16,290 16,290 6144 Long-term Disability Insurance 1,555 1,735 1,735 1,765 1,765 1,830 1,830 6145 Hospital&Life Insurance 96,730 89,925 89,925 95,305 95,305 100,945 100,945 6170 Employee Paid Premiums (8,600) (9,900) (9,900) (10,100) (10,100) (10,100) (10,100) Total 856,960 923,240 923,240 947,135 947,135 987,565 987,565 6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES Miscellaneous 1,800 1,800 1,200 1,800 1,800 1,200 1,200 Total 1,800 1,800 1,200 1,800 1,800 1,200 1,200 6211 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT Miscellaneous 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Total 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS Miscellaneous 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Total 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES Youth Athletic Association 500 Administration 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 Remote Access Equipment(Laptops,etc. 6,000 - - - - Reduce to Trend (500) - - - - Total 6,500 500 500 500 500 500 500 6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES Technical Asst.Park Develop-General 13,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 Park Bond Research - - - - - Total 13,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 6237 TELEPHONE Miscellaneous - 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 11,000 10,900 Stipend-Mobile Communication 8,000 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 Total 8,000 10,500 10,500 10,500 10,500 12,500 12,400 6238 POSTAGE/UPS/FEDEX Mail Brochures 14,000 Mailings 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Total 14,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6239 PRINTING/PUBLISHING Regular/Annual Publications 32,500 9,000 8,000 2,500 2,500 2,000 2,000 Bond Referendum Information - 6,000 6,000 Facility Advertising/Rental Promotion 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,000 2,000 Total 35,000 17,500 16,500 5,000 5,000 4,000 4,000 6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES Disabled Program-Interpreters,Aids 500 200 200 200 200 Music Licensing 1,000 1,000 965 1,000 965 GoToMeeting Software License(x4) 435 135 135 135 135 135 135 Total 935 335 1,335 1,335 1,300 1,135 1,100 6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT Multi-Use Copier Mntc Agreement 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Total 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 6275 SCHOOL/CONF/EXP-LOCAL 2,000 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 Total 2,000 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 6276 SCHOOL/CONF/EXP-OTHER(NON LOCAL) Park&Rec Conference-Director 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 1,950 2,000 1,950 Total 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 1,950 2,000 1,950 6277 MILEAGE ALLOWANCE Staff Mileage 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 3,000 5,000 3,000 Total 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 3,000 5,000 3,000 6278 SUBSISTANCE ALLOWANCE 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 Total 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 6280 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS MRPA,NRPA 3,700 3,700 3,700 3,700 3,700 3,700 3,700 Total 3,700 3,700 3,700 3,700 3,700 3,700 3,700 6281 UNIFORMS/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 700 700 700 700 350 700 350 Total 700 700 700 700 350 700 350 201 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 37: PARK/RECREATION ADMINISTRATION-1700 COMPANY 1000: GENERAL FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND 6310 RENTAL EXPENSE Multi-Use Copier 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 Chamber-Home&Garden 600 - 600 600 600 600 600 Total 4,100 3,500 4,100 4,100 4,100 4,100 4,100 6355 ON-LINE REGISTRATION FEES 25,000 25,000 25,000 29,800 29,800 29,800 29,800 Total 25,000 25,000 25,000 29,800 29,800 29,800 29,800 6399 OTHER CHARGES Recreation Program Scholarships - - - - - - - Volunteer Program 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 4th of July Fireworks 25,000 25,000 25,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 Fire Works-Lodging Tax Transfer (5,000) (5,000) (5,000) (5,000) (7,500) (5,000) (7,500) 4th of July Parade 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 16,600 20,000 17,600 Parade-Lodging Tax Transfer (5,000) (5,000) (5,000) (5,000) (7,500) (5,000) (7,500) Total 35,500 35,500 35,500 40,500 32,100 40,500 33,100 Total Net of Personnel 162,585 121,135 121,135 120,035 109,200 120,235 110,300 TOTAL EXPENSES 1,019,545 1,044,375 1,044,375 $ 1,067,170 $ 1,056,335 $ 1,107,800 $ 1,097,865 202 ... .... ..... ..• AppValley Notes: 203 COMPANY DEPARTMENT BUSINESS UNIT ACTIVITY 1000 38 1710 Park Maintenance DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY Maintain the integrity of over 680 acres of park infrastructure. Including 105 athletic fields, 2 aquatic facilities, 53 playgrounds, 20 basketball and tennis courts, 26 park buildings, 8 pickleball courts, 80 miles of plowable paths, 32 parking lots, 19 outdoor ice rinks, 1 disc golf course, and a skate park. Keeping the park system safe and enjoyable for the user. In the coming months the Park Director, Park Maintenance and Recreation staff will be working with the Park and Recreation Advisory Committee to explore funding mechanisms. Much of the park infrastructure is in need of replacement or renovation and it is crucial for the public and the council to support the efforts. Objectives for 2023 & 2024 • Playground resurfacing • Backstop replacements at Valley Middle, & JCRPE & JCRPW • Trail overlays • Funding for the long term replacement of existing park assets 204 IMPACT MEASURES / PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual Actual Actual Projected Projected Projected Item 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Parkland Acres 680 685 685 685 701 701 Add'I Public Open Space 16 16 Add'l Cobblestone & Kelley Acres 5 Athletic Field Maintenance Athletic Fields 105 105 105 105 105 105 Park Grounds Maintenance Managed Turf 398 398 411 411 411 411 acres/wk acres/wk acres/wk acres/wk acres/wk acres/wk Planting Beds Maintained 39 39 41 41 115 115 Irrigation Systems 7 7 7 7 7 7 Ice Rink Maintenance Outdoor Sheets of Pleasure Rink Ice 9 9 9 8 8 8 Outdoor Hockey Rinks 10 10 10 10 10 10 Park Shelter/Building Maintenance Park Shelters/Buildings 26 26 26 28 28 28 Playground Structure Maintenance Playgrounds 54 53 53 53 53 53 Certified Playground Inspectors 2 3 3 3 3 3 Sidewalk,Pathway, Lot Maintenance Internal Park Paths 20 Miles 20 Miles 20 Miles 20 Miles 20 Miles 20 Miles Pathway and Sidewalk Plowing 79 Miles 80 Miles 80 Miles 80 Miles 80 Miles 80 Miles Parking Lots Maintained 31 32 32 32 32 32 Outdoor Court& Game Area Maintenance Pickleball Courts 6 6 6 8 8 8 Tennis Courts 20 20 20 20 20 20 Basketball Courts 20 20 20 21 22 22 Volleyball Courts 17 17 17 17 17 17 Disc Golf Course 1 1 1 1 1 1 Outdoor Skate Park 1 1 1 1 1 1 Archery Range 1 1 1 1 1 1 Swimming Pool Maintenance Redwood Pool 1 1 1 1 1 1 Family Aquatic Center 1 1 1 1 1 1 Certified Pool Operators 3 3 4 4 4 4 205 Regular Status Personnel Schedule - FTE's Actual Actual Actual Proposed Proposed Proposed Position Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Park Main Superintendent 1 1 1 1 1 1 Park Maintenance Supervisor 1 1 1 1 1 Park Foreman 3 3 3 3 3 3 Park,Tech Specialist 5 4 4 3 3 3 Park Maintenance I/II 8 8 8 9 9 9 Total 17 17 17 17 17 17 Temporary Status Personnel Schedule - (Part-Time hours) Actual Actual Actual Proposed Proposed Proposed Position Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Seasonal Staff Main I 14,313 6,874 10,466 14,750 13,100 13,100 Seasonal Staff Main I I 356 1,139 733 700 700 Total 14,669 8,013 11,199 14,750 13,800 13,800 COMPARATIVE BUDGET EXPENDITURES The following table is the expenses that have been captured over the past three years related to the service categories. 2019 % of 2020 % of 2021 % of Service categories total total total Actual Dept Actual Dept Actual Dept 1710 Park Management 925,209 32.5% 852,848 34.3% 1,081,682 35.5% 1713 Tournaments 7,230 0.3% 24,787 0.8% 1715/1780 Athletic Fields 515,729 18.1% 377,768 15.2% 421,644 13.8% 1720/1760 Park Grounds 712,040 25.0% 645,138 26.0% 765,472 25.1% 1725 Ice Rinks 51,720 1.8% 55,077 2.2% 78,382 2.6% 1730 Park Shelter/Buildings 195,048 6.8% 157,021 6.3% 177,388 5.8% 1735 Playground Structures 25,762 0.9% 5,834 0.2% 18,049 0.6% 1740 Sidewalk, Pathway, Lot Maintenance/Plowing 112,080 3.9% 73,776 3.0% 72,004 2.4% 1745 Court/Game Areas 12,837 0.5% 6,596 0.3% 9,660 0.3% 1750 Swimming Pools 66,739 2.3% 66,254 2.7% 131,560 4.3% 1755 Recreation Support 7,236 0.3% 1,865 0.1% 16,813 0.6% 1765 Equipment 206,483 7.2% 200,882 8.1% 205,400 6.7% 1770 General Maintenance 31,471 1.1% 18,308 0.7% 33,849 1.1 1771 Vandalism Repair 1,051 0.0% 1,603 0.1% 1,673 0.1% 1775 Training 17,569 0.6% 13,994 0.6% 9,973 0.3% 1785 Other Dept. Support 719 0.0% 195 0.0% 39 0.0% Total Park Main Depart 2,850,221 100.0% 2,484,389 100.0% 3,048,431 100.0% 206 Summary Budget Department 38-Park Maintenance 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Revenue: 5126-Rentals-Fields 68,063 38,310 129,887 70,000 75,000 90,000 92,000 Expenditures: Salaries&Wages 1,266,957 1,111,974 1,362,750 1,449,495 1,504,465 1,652,950 1,713,815 Employee Benefits 455,076 414,950 492,085 527,185 517,580 573,475 591,950 Supplies 269,504 203,842 241,526 267,600 255,600 300,000 315,000 Contractual Services 205,862 213,159 189,883 206,000 208,500 215,000 222,000 Utilities 196,268 158,873 225,881 211,200 212,800 206,000 207,000 Repairs&Maintenance 101,171 41,884 180,362 78,000 23,000 24,000 24,000 Training/Travel/Dues/Uniforms 14,247 14,142 14,347 16,300 17,300 15,000 18,000 Other Expenses 62,449 51,959 70,978 64,000 64,000 66,000 68,000 Capital Outlay 41,906 3,221 - - - - - VERF 236,780 236,700 270,620 270,620 254,800 264,400 284,810 Total Exp 2,850,221 2,450,704 3,048,432 3,090,400 3,058,045 3,316,825 3,444,575 Net addition(use)of general (2,782,158) (2,412,394) (2,918,545) (3,020,400) (2,983,045) (3,226,825) (3,352,575) revenues Park Facilities Fund 4820 2023 2024 Crack-fill and chip seal JCRPE lots 75,000 Overlay Park Trails 100,000 Backstop replacement Valley Middle (two) 25,000 Total 75,000 125,000 City of Apple Valley 207 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) PARK MAINTENANCE 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6110-SALARY-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 1,022,731 976,228 1,180,578 1,188,500 1,228,610 583,863 1,343,880 1,343,880 1,395,795 1,395,795 6111-SALARY PART-TIME 0 5,568 203 0 6112-SALARY-SEASONAL TEMP 189,153 107,895 154,110 185,000 189,000 40,307 202,970 240,970 209,085 248,085 6113-OVERTIME-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 80,120 40,098 56,102 55,000 56,000 27,136 58,000 58,000 59,700 59,700 6121-INSURANCE CASH BENEFIT 4,680 5,220 6,180 7,380 6122-COMP REQUEST -29,727 -23,036 -34,424 -10,000 -10,250 -24,804 -20,000 -35,000 -20,000 -35,000 6123-SALARY-OTHER 30,995 41,105 45,100 45,100 45,235 45,235 6105-SALARIES AND WAGES 1,266,957 1,111,974 1,362,750 1,449,495 1,504,465 633,882 1,629,950 1,652,950 1,689,815 1,713,815 6138-MEDICARE 17,521 15,090 18,585 21,160 21,960 8,773 23,925 23,925 24,790 24,790 6139-FICA 74,918 63,803 79,465 87,815 93,910 37,513 99,545 99,545 102,900 102,900 6141-PENSIONS-PERA 79,409 73,885 88,730 95,585 99,425 43,713 108,525 108,525 112,555 112,555 6142-WORKERS COMPENSATION 53,312 50,375 66,444 74,000 74,670 37,919 118,485 118,485 112,605 112,605 6143-UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 271 0 0 0 6144-LONG-TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE 2,221 1,988 1,988 4,015 3,515 817 3,820 3,820 3,965 3,965 6145-MEDICAL INSURANCE 250,959 242,776 276,826 276,310 260,700 98,753 271,475 271,475 287,435 287,435 6146-DENTAL INSURANCE 19,879 18,368 20,569 9,000 6147-LIFE INSURANCE-BASIC 100 87 107 150 6148-LIFE INSURANCE-SUPP/DEPEND 6,319 6,176 6,653 4,598 6170-EMPLOYEE PAID PREMIUMS -49,835 -57,598 -67,281 -31,700 -36,600 -8,977 -37,300 -52,300 -37,300 -52,300 6125-EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 455,076 414,950 492,085 527,185 517,580 232,258 588,475 573,475 606,950 591,950 6100-TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 1,722,033 1,526,924 1,854,835 1,976,680 2,022,045 866,140 2,218,425 2,226,425 2,296,765 2,305,765 6210-OFFICE SUPPLIES 413 263 478 100 100 107 200 200 200 200 6211-SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT 10,743 18,821 5,022 10,000 10,000 2,689 12,000 12,000 15,000 15,000 6212-MOTOR FUELS/OILS 50,948 33,140 46,414 50,000 52,000 22,866 91,000 91,000 91,000 91,000 6213-FERTILIZER 28,064 23,924 23,572 35,000 35,000 31,968 35,000 35,000 40,000 40,000 6214-CHEMICALS 4,997 3,841 4,895 3,500 0 0 4,500 4,500 5,000 5,000 6215-EQUIPMENT-PARTS 49,018 37,121 52,105 44,000 44,000 28,441 45,000 45,000 52,500 52,500 6216-VEHICLES-TIRES/BATTERIES 14,028 9,502 6,074 8,000 8,000 4,234 8,000 8,000 7,000 7,000 6229-GENERAL SUPPLIES 111,292 77,231 102,966 117,000 106,500 45,549 110,500 104,300 113,000 104,300 6205-SUPPLIES 269,504 203,842 241,526 267,600 255,600 135,854 306,200 300,000 323,700 315,000 6235-CONSULTANT SERVICES 712 1,207 1,816 861 6237-TELEPHONE/PAGERS 11,591 11,357 12,142 11,000 11,000 5,357 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 6238-POSTAGE/UPS/FEDEX 0 0 18 0 6239-PRINTING 0 104 49 206 6240-CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE 31,465 20,614 24,337 25,000 25,000 9,185 26,000 26,000 26,000 26,000 6249-OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 162,095 179,877 151,521 170,000 172,500 25,129 178,250 178,000 189,750 185,000 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 205,862 213,159 189,883 206,000 208,500 40,738 215,250 215,000 226,750 222,000 6255-UTILITIES-ELECTRIC 97,129 84,377 106,233 105,000 106,500 41,719 101,500 99,700 101,500 100,700 6256-UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS 6,307 4,302 4,500 6,200 6,300 5,108 6,300 6,300 6,300 6,300 6257-UTILITIES-PROPANE/VVATER/SEWER 92,833 70,194 115,149 100,000 100,000 1,184 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 6250-UTILITIES 196,268 158,873 225,881 211,200 212,800 48,010 207,800 206,000 207,800 207,000 6265-REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 11,030 15,343 8,211 13,000 13,000 410 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 6266-REPAIRS-BUILDING 14,763 3,290 18,432 10,000 10,000 7,021 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 6269-REPAIRS-OTHER 75,377 23,251 153,718 55,000 0 158 75,000 0 156,500 0 6260-REPAIRS AND MAINTENA 101,171 41,884 180,362 78,000 23,000 7,588 99,000 24,000 180,500 24,000 6275-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL 1,486 2,710 2,095 2,000 2,000 1,858 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 6276-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP OTHER 0 0 1,849 1,700 1,700 384 3,000 0 4,000 2,000 6277-MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE 150 159 0 0 6280-DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 437 398 154 600 600 51 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 6281-UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 12,175 10,875 10,249 12,000 13,000 4,311 13,000 11,800 13,000 12,800 6270-TRNG/TRAVL/DUES/UNIF 14,247 14,142 14,347 16,300 17,300 6,605 19,200 15,000 20,200 18,000 City of Apple Valley 208 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) PARK MAINTENANCE 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 787,053 631,900 851,999 779,100 717,200 238,795 847,450 760,000 958,950 786,000 6310-RENTAL EXPENSE 62,526 52,032 70,874 64,000 64,000 39,305 68,500 66,000 71,500 68,000 6333-GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS -122 -74 -41 -31 6399-OTHER CHARGES 44 0 144 100 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES 62,449 51,959 70,978 64,000 64,000 39,374 68,500 66,000 71,500 68,000 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES 62,449 51,959 70,978 64,000 64,000 39,374 68,500 66,000 71,500 68,000 6601-TOTAL DEPRECIATION 0 0 0 0 6600-TOTAL DEPRECIATION 0 0 0 0 6735-CAPITAL OUTLAY-OTHER IMPROVEME 38,550 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6740-CAPITAL OUTLAY-MACH/EQ/OTHER 3,356 3,221 0 0 0 0 6745-VERF CHARGES 236,780 236,700 270,620 270,620 254,800 178,333 302,400 264,400 284,810 284,810 6701-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 278,686 239,921 270,620 270,620 254,800 178,333 302,400 264,400 284,810 284,810 6700-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 278,686 239,921 270,620 270,620 254,800 178,333 302,400 264,400 284,810 284,810 2,850,221 2,450,704 3,048,432 3,090,400 3,058,045 1,322,643 3,436,775 3,316,825 3,612,025 3,444,575 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL 209 DEPT 38: PARK MAINTENANCE-1710 COMPANY 1000: GENERAL FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND REVENUE 5126 Rentals-Fields(Moved from Recreation in 2022) 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 90,000 70,000 92,000 SALARIES 6110 Regular Employees 1,188,500 1,228,610 1,228,610 1,343,880 1,343,880 1,395,795 1,395,795 6112 Salary-Seasonal Temp 185,000 189,000 189,000 202,970 240,970 209,085 248,085 6113 Overtime-Reg 55,000 56,000 56,000 58,000 58,000 59,700 59,700 6122 Comp-Requested (10,000) (10,250) (10,250) (20,000) (35,000) (20,000) (35,000) 6123 Salaries-Other 30,995 41,105 41,105 45,100 45,100 45,235 45,235 6138 Medicare 21,160 21,960 21,960 23,925 23,925 24,790 24,790 6139 FICA 87,815 93,910 93,910 99,545 99,545 102,900 102,900 6141 Pension-PERA 95,585 99,425 99,425 108,525 108,525 112,555 112,555 6142 Work Comp Insurance 74,000 74,670 74,670 118,485 118,485 112,605 112,605 6144 Long-term Disability Insurance 4,015 3,515 3,515 3,820 3,820 3,965 3,965 6145 Medical Insurance 276,310 260,700 260,700 271,475 271,475 287,435 287,435 6170 Employee Paid Premiums (31,700) (36,600) (36,600) (37,300) (52,300) (37,300) (52,300) Total 1,976,680 2,022,045 2,022,045 2,218,425 2,226,425 2,296,765 2,305,765 6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES General Supplies 100 100 100 200 200 200 200 Total 100 100 100 200 200 200 200 6211 SMALL TOOL&EQUIPMENT Tools&Miscellaneous Equipment 10,000 10,000 10,000 12,000 12,000 15,000 15,000 Total 10,000 10,000 10,000 12,000 12,000 15,000 15,000 6212 MOTOR FUELS/OILS 50,000 52,000 52,000 91,000 91,000 91,000 91,000 Total 50,000 52,000 52,000 91,000 91,000 91,000 91,000 6213 FERTILIZER 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 40,000 40,000 Total 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 40,000 40,000 6214 CHEMICALS 3,500 - - 4,500 4,500 5,000 5,000 Total 3,500 - - 4,500 4,500 5,000 5,000 6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS Vehicle and Equipment Parts 36,000 36,000 36,000 36,000 36,000 36,000 36,000 Play Equipment Parts 3,000 3,000 3,000 4,000 4,000 11,500 11,500 Irrigation Parts 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Total 44,000 44,000 44,000 45,000 45,000 52,500 52,500 6216 EQUIPMENT-TIRES/BATTERIES Miscellaneous 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 7,000 7,000 Total 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 7,000 7,000 6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES-ATHLETIC FIELDS/COURTS Athletic Field Paint 23,000 23,000 23,000 24,000 24,000 26,500 26,500 Athletic Field Chalk 2,500 2,500 2,500 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 Diamond Dry,Turface,Etc. 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 Bases,Plates,Rubbers 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 Aglime 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,500 8,500 8,500 8,500 Mound Clay 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 Fence Repair Material 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 Volleyball,Soccer,Tennis Nets 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Archery Bales 1,000 1,000 1,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 3,500 - - - - Reduce to Trend (6,200) (8,700) Total 45,500 42,000 42,000 45,500 39,300 48,000 39,300 GENERAL SUPPLIES-LANDSCAPE Grass seed/seed mat 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Topsoil/compost 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 Sod 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Landscape Block/Timbers 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Tree Trust and Scout Projects 9,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 Trees/shrubs,etc. 10,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Total 40,000 33,000 33,000 33,000 33,000 33,000 33,000 GENERAL SUPPLIES-PAINT Paint,Stain,Varnish 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 Rollers,Brushes,Drop Cloths 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 Total 9,500 9,500 9,500 9,500 9,500 9,500 9,500 GENERAL SUPPLIES-BUILDINGS Lumber and Metal for Repair of Rinks, Buildings,Benches,Tables,etc. 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Total 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 GENERAL SUPPLIES-CLEANING Soap,Disinfectants,Brooms,Toilet Scrubbers,Mop Heads,Restroom Paper Products 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 Total 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL 210 DEPT 38: PARK MAINTENANCE-1710 COMPANY 1000: GENERAL FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND GENERAL SUPPLIES-SHOP Fasteners,Light Bulbs,Zip Ties, Garbage Bags,Rags,Tape, Sandpaper,Small Repair Parts, Hardware 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 Total 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 16229 TOTAL GENERAL SUPPLIES-All Business Units I 117,000 106,500 106,500 110,500 104,300 113,000 104,300 6237 TELEPHONE Park Buildings,Foremen,Superintendent 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 Total 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 6240 C.SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVAL Buildings-Trash,Yard dumpster,Landfill Fees, and Yard Waste 25,000 25,000 25,000 26,000 26,000 26,000 26,000 Total 25,000 25,000 25,000 26,000 26,000 26,000 26,000 6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES Productive Parks 6,500 - Sentence to Service Contract Cost 15,750 15,750 15,750 16,750 16,750 16,750 16,750 Contract Weed Spraying 28,500 28,500 28,500 29,500 29,500 29,500 29,500 Contract Mowing of Smaller Parks 70,000 72,500 72,500 72,500 72,500 77,500 77,500 Diseased Tree Removal 20,000 20,000 20,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 Tree Trust 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 Irrigation,Maintenance Service for Cobblestone Lake Park 30,250 30,250 30,250 32,000 32,000 32,000 32,000 Septic Pumping-Huntington Park 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Adjust to Trend (250) 1,750 Total 170,000 172,500 172,500 178,250 178,000 189,750 185,000 6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC Building,Athletic Field,Parking Lot, Fountain and Walkway Lights 105,000 106,500 106,500 101,500 99,700 101,500 100,700 Total 105,000 106,500 106,500 101,500 99,700 101,500 100,700 6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS 6,200 6,300 6,300 6,300 6,300 6,300 6,300 Total 6,200 6,300 6,300 6,300 6,300 6,300 6,300 6257 UTILITIES-OTHER Water,Sewer 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Total 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT Larger Outside Repairs 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 Total 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 6266 REPAIRS-BUILDINGS Outside Trade Contractors- Heating/Cooling,Electrical and other Contractual Repairs 10,000 10,000 10,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 Total 10,000 10,000 10,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 6269 REPAIRS-OTHER(to Park Facilities Fund) Replace Sand with Engineered Wood Fiber 22,500 - Backstop replacement Valley Middle 1,2,3&4(to Park Facilities Fund) 50,000 - Crack-fill and chip seal all JCRPE Lots(Park Facilities Fund) 75,000 - Back stop replacments JCRPE&JCRPW(to Park Facilities Fund) 84,000 - Asphalt Trails and Basketball Courts 55,000 Total 55,000 - - 75,000 - 156,500 - 6275 SCHOOL/CONF/EXP-LOCAL 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Total 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 6276 SCHOOL/CONF/EXP-OTHER(NON LOCAL) Supervisor school,Turf,management classes 1,700 1,700 1,700 3,000 - 4,000 2,000 Total 1,700 1,700 1,700 3,000 - 4,000 2,000 6280 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS MPSA,MRPA,STMA,MNLA,productive parks 600 600 600 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 Total 600 600 600 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE Uniform/Boots/Safety Equipment(winter boots) 12,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 11,800 13,000 12,800 Total 12,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 11,800 13,000 12,800 6310 RENTAL EXPENSE Miscellaneous and Portable Commodes 19,000 19,000 19,000 20,000 17,500 23,000 19,500 Mower Leasing 45,000 45,000 45,000 48,500 48,500 48,500 48,500 Total 64,000 64,000 64,000 68,500 66,000 71,500 68,000 6735 CAPITAL OUTLAY-OTHER IMP Asphalt-Parking Lots and Trails - - - -I - Total - - - - - - 6745 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT-VERF VERF-Vehicle Replacement Charges 242,620 254,800 254,800 264,400 264,400 284,810 284,810 Fleet Additions-Toro SandPro 28,000 - - - - Robotic Striper - - - 38,000 - - Total 270,620 254,800 254,800 302,400 264,400 284,810 284,810 Total Net of Personnel 1,113,720 1,036,000 1,036,000 1,218,350 1,090,400 1,315,260 1,138,810 TOTAL EXPENSES 3,090,400 3,058,045 3,058,045 3,436,775 3,316,825 3,612,025 3,444,575 211 COMPANY DEPARTMENT BUSINESS UNIT ACTIVITY 1000 39 1800 Recreation Programs DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY The recreation programs budget includes a number of general recreation programs such as Summer Playground, Puppet Theatre, Outdoor Skating/Warming-houses,Youth, Teen, Adult and Family Recreation Programs, etc. Provide recreational and educational situations and settings where parents and children can have fun and learn together. Some programs focus on the participating individuals, while other classes provide the opportunity to build close family relationships. These family oriented programs allow for social interactions, sharing and discovery. Recreation programs provide a service that contributes to the social, physical, educational, mental, emotional, cultural and general well-being of community members and to a community as a whole. The department strives to provide adequate facilities and program opportunities, which encourage community members to become more self-sustaining in their leisure. OBJECTIVES FOR 2023 & 2024 Work to boost program attendance and exposure. Continue to offer a variety of programs for all age segments in a cost-effective manner. Evaluate program offerings and introduce new activities/events. Evaluate warming house locations and hours. • Add a Recreation Intern position in 2024 • Add/enhance positive community celebrations such as Mid-Winter Fest/Freedom Days and a Fall Festival PERFORMANCE MEASURES/EFFECTIVENESS/EFFICIENCY: Recommendations for each program are documented. The program is dropped if it is determined to be less successful. The program is continued if it is very successful, well attended or worthwhile to our mission, or if implemented changes can make it successful. CivicRec has the capability to send surveys to program participants so those results will help us evaluate program quality. IMPACT MEASURES / PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual Actual Actual Projected Projected Projected Item 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Playground Program 554 133 329 500 550 550 Freedom Days Fun Run 381 216 500 500 500 Puppet Wagon 3,403 1,853 3,502 4,000 4,000 4,000 Summer Camps Offered 4 4 7 7 8 8 Trunk or Treat Est. Att. 1,000 1,200 1,300 1,300 212 Temporary Status Personnel Schedule - (Part-Time hours) Actual Actual Actual Proposed Proposed Proposed Position Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Rec Programs - 1800 75 36 463 200 200 Puppeteer- 1805 859 399 739 775 700 700 Rec Programs - 1820 135 3 71 100 100 Playgrd Program - 1825 1,716 495 1,352 1,700 1,700 1,700 Building Attendant - 1830 69 158 106 100 100 Warming House Att. - 1835 2,081 2,010 277 2,000 2,100 2,100 Rec Programs - 1840 1,174 800 800 Rec Intern 500 Total 6,108 3,100 3,073 4,475 5,700 6,200 * No on-site warming-house attendants, just turning on and off rink lights. Summary Budget Department 39-Recreation Programs 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Proposed Proposed Proposed Revenue: 4350 Summer Playground 13,946 3,127 11,381 17,500 18,000 16,000 16,000 5130 Rentals-JC Activity Ctr 1,603 490 - 7,000 1,000 28,000 28,000 5199 Rentals-Other 7,501 5,527 13,850 7,000 10,000 15,000 15,000 23,050 9,143 25,231 31,500 29,000 59,000 59,000 Expenditures: Salaries&Wages 79,589 35,730 44,697 108,000 82,685 88,710 101,665 Employiee Benefits 11,422 4,735 6,939 14,495 10,690 10,090 10,510 Supplies 9,625 1,601 4,522 9,800 10,200 8,000 8,300 Contractual Services 11,077 8,024 3,241 3,600 3,000 4,000 4,200 Repairs&Maintenance 27 2,557 - 200 550 50 50 Training/Travel/Dues 1,130 287 1,057 1,595 1,450 1,350 1,350 Other Expenses 1,774 (14) 2,935 4,000 5,400 2,500 2,600 Items for Resale 1,037 - - - - - Total Exp 115,681 52,920 63,391 141,690 113,975 114,700 128,675 Net addition to(use of) (92,631) (43,777) (38,160) (110,190) (84,975) (55,700) (69,675) general revenues 2023 CAPITAL OUTLAY None 2024 CAPITAL OUTLAY None City of Apple Valley 213 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) RECREATION PROGRAMS 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6111-SALARY PART-TIME 0 0 1,220 0 0 938 6112-SALARY-SEASONAL TEMP 79,589 35,702 43,478 108,000 82,685 24,631 88,710 88,710 101,665 101,665 6123-SALARY-OTHER 0 0 6124-OVERTIME-SEASONAL TEMP 0 28 0 246 6105-SALARIES AND WAGES 79,589 35,730 44,697 108,000 82,685 25,815 88,710 88,710 101,665 101,665 6138-MEDICARE 1,154 518 648 1,565 1,200 374 1,285 1,285 1,325 1,325 6139-FICA 4,935 2,215 2,771 6,695 5,125 1,601 5,500 5,500 5,665 5,665 6141-PENSIONS-PERA 1,782 290 1,208 3,750 2,450 573 1,250 1,250 1,300 1,300 6142-WORKERS COMPENSATION 3,512 1,709 2,312 2,485 1,915 1,556 2,055 2,055 2,220 2,220 6143-UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 40 4 0 0 6125-EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 11,422 4,735 6,939 14,495 10,690 4,104 10,090 10,090 10,510 10,510 6100-TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 91,011 40,466 51,637 122,495 93,375 29,919 98,800 98,800 112,175 112,175 6210-OFFICE SUPPLIES 0 19 0 0 0 0 6211-SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT 1,009 0 0 0 0 0 6215-EQUIPMENT-PARTS 388 0 0 100 100 0 0 0 0 0 6229-GENERAL SUPPLIES 8,228 1,582 4,522 9,700 10,100 2,111 10,500 8,000 11,000 8,300 6205-SUPPLIES 9,625 1,601 4,522 9,800 10,200 2,111 10,500 8,000 11,000 8,300 6237-TELEPHONE/PAGERS 0 0 0 0 0 0 6238-POSTAGE/UPS/FEDEX 0 0 23 0 0 0 6239-PRINTING 0 0 226 0 0 0 0 0 200 200 6240-CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE 562 852 498 600 0 235 0 0 0 0 6249-OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 10,515 7,172 2,494 3,000 3,000 10,569 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 11,077 8,024 3,241 3,600 3,000 10,804 4,000 4,000 4,200 4,200 6265-REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 27 0 0 200 550 0 200 50 200 50 6266-REPAIRS-BUILDING 0 2,557 0 0 0 0 6260-REPAIRS AND MAINTENA 27 2,557 0 200 550 0 200 50 200 50 6275-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL 0 0 0 220 0 0 6277-MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE 804 167 1,057 875 900 111 900 900 900 900 6280-DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 0 120 0 0 0 0 6281-UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 326 0 0 500 550 275 450 450 450 450 6270-TRNG/TRAVL/DUES/UNIF 1,130 287 1,057 1,595 1,450 387 1,350 1,350 1,350 1,350 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 21,859 12,468 8,820 15,195 15,200 13,302 16,050 13,400 16,750 13,900 6310-RENTAL EXPENSE 1,245 0 1,320 2,000 2,900 6,492 2,400 2,000 2,500 2,100 6333-GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS 0 0 -6 0 6351-VISA/BANK CHARGES 1,290 562 6399-OTHER CHARGES 529 -14 330 2,000 2,500 350 1,100 500 500 500 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES 1,774 -14 2,934 4,000 5,400 7,404 3,500 2,500 3,000 2,600 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES 1,774 -14 2,934 4,000 5,400 7,404 3,500 2,500 3,000 2,600 6401-EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 6400-TOTAL EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 6540-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE 1,037 0 0 0 0 0 6501-TAXABLE/NON-TAXABLE MISC RESAL 1,037 0 0 0 0 0 6500-TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,037 0 0 0 0 0 6735-CAPITAL OUTLAY-OTHER IMPROVEME 0 0 6701-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 0 0 6700-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 0 0 115,681 52,920 63,391 141,690 113,975 50,625 118,350 114,700 131,925 128,675 214 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 39: RECREATION PROGRAMS-1800 COMPANY 1000: GENERAL FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND REVENUE 4350 Summer Playground 17,500 18,000 - 18,000 16,000 18,000 16,000 5130 Rental-Johnny Cake Activity Center 7,000 1,000 1,160 1,000 28,000 22,000 28,000 5199 Rentals-Others 7,000 10,000 10,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Total 31,500 29,000 11,160 34,000 59,000 55,000 59,000 SALARIES 6111 Salary-Parttime - - 6112 Salary-Seasonal Temp 108,000 82,685 82,685 88,710 88,710 91,370 91,370 6123 Salary-Other - - - - - 6138 Medicare 1,565 1,200 1,200 1,285 1,285 1,325 1,325 6139 FICA 6,695 5,125 5,125 5,500 5,500 5,665 5,665 6141 Pension-PERA 3,750 2,450 2,450 1,250 1,250 1,300 1,300 6142 Work Comp 2,485 1,915 1,915 2,055 2,055 2,220 2,220 6111 Position Changes(Rec-Intern) - - 10,295 10,295 Total 122,495 93,375 93,375 98,800 98,800 112,175 112,175 6215 EQUIPMENT/PARTS 100 100 100 - - - - Total 100 100 100 - - - - 6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES Programs-Fall Festival 3,000 3,000 Programs-MWF 3,000 3,000 Programs-Puppet Wagon 800 900 900 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Programs-Teen 900 1,000 1,000 500 500 - - Programs-Special Events 5,500 5,700 5,700 6,000 6,000 2,000 2,000 Programs-Summer Playground 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 1,000 1,000 Programs-Preschool Gym 500 500 500 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Trend Reductions (2,500) (2,700) Total 9,700 10,100 10,100 10,500 8,000 11,000 8,300 6239 PRINTING/PUBLISHING Flyers and Posters-Fun Run - - - - 200 200 Total - - - - - 200 200 6240 GARBAGE/CLEANING SERVICES 600 - - - Total 600 - - - - - - 6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES Programs-Fun Run 1,500 1,500 1,500 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Programs-Playground Bus 1,000 1,000 1,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Programs-Other 500 500 500 - - - - Total 3,000 3,000 3,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT Teen Center Equipment 100 - - - - Puppet Wagon 100 550 550 200 50 200 50 Total 200 550 550 200 50 200 50 6275 SCHOOL/CONF/EXP-LOCAL MRPA Summer Lead Workshop 220 - - - - - - Total 220 - - - - - - 6277 MILEAGE ALLOWANCE Summer Playground Staff 875 900 900 900 900 900 900 Total 875 900 900 900 900 900 900 6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE Staff Shirts-Summer Playground/Puppeteers 400 450 450 450 450 450 450 Staff Shirts-Teens 100 100 100 - - Total 500 550 550 450 450 450 450 6310 RENTAL EXPENSE Portable Toilets 2,000 2,900 2,900 2,400 2,000 2,500 2,100 Total 2,000 2,900 2,900 2,400 2,000 2,500 2,100 6399 OTHER CHARGES Outing Fees-ADA Interpreter/Aid 1,000 1,000 1,000 500 200 200 200 Outing Fees-Teens 500 750 750 400 - - - Outing Fees-Summer Playground 500 750 750 200 300 300 300 Total 2,000 2,500 2,500 1,100 500 500 500 Total Net of Personnel 19,195 20,600 20,600 19,550 15,900 19,750 16,500 TOTAL EXPENSES $ 141,690 $ 113,975 $ 113,975 $ 118,350 $ 114,700 $ 131,925 $ 128,675 215 COMPANY DEPARTMENT BUSINESS UNIT ACTIVITY 1000 40 1930 Redwood Pool DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY The Redwood Outdoor Pool is located in Redwood Park and is operated by the Parks and Recreation Department as a general fund recreational facility. It contains two pools; a leisure pool with depths running from three to twelve feet and features a diving board and a climbing wall. The smaller wading pool is appropriate for young children with a water depth of 18 inches. The capacity of the facility is 300 people. Redwood Pool is also the primary teaching facility for the city's American Red Cross "Learn to Swim" program, providing instruction to children and adults in swimming and water safety community wide. During weeknights after swimming lessons and during mornings and weekend nights, "exclusive use" rentals are offered to the public. These rentals have become very popular, especially on weekend nights. The concession operation serves a variety of snack foods, drinks and treats. MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2023 & 2024 Utilize the Facilities Master Plan study to create a strategy for the City's long-term system needs, including a possible Parks and Recreation Bond Referendum in 2023. The study is intended to develop options, provide images of proposed improvements, create a priority list, and develop cost estimates associated with those improvements. It is likely that Redwood Pool will be replaced as a part of an updated Master Plan for the entire park. IMPACT MEASURES / PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual Actual Actual Projected Projected Projected 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Item Open Swim Attendance 3,366 Pool 5,071 4,000 4,000 4,000 Swim Lesson Registrations 238 Closed 240 200 200 200 Exclusive Use Pool Rentals 49 In'20 77 80 80 80 Days Open 65 67 70 70 70 Average Daily Attendance 52 76 67 67 67 Net cost per visitor ($16.74) ($14.61) ($5.35) ($9.50) ($9.56) Regular Status Personnel Schedule —FTE's Actual Actual Actual Proposed Proposed Proposed Position Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Custodian .25 0.0 .25 .25 .25 .25 Total .25 0.0 .25 .25 .25 .25 Temporary Status Personnel Schedule — (Part-Time hours) Actual Actual Actual Proposed Proposed Proposed Position Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Facility Attendants 143 Pool 66 400 200 200 Lifeguard I 2,174 Closed 2,203 3,100 1,900 1,900 WSI 1,629 In'20 1,479 600 1,600 1,600 Pool Manager 755 1,179 1,000 900 900 Maintenance 18 200 Total 4,718 0 4,927 5,300 4,600 4,600 216 Summary Budget Department 40-Redwood Pool 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Proposed Proposed Proposed Revenue: 4310 Public Swimming 33,532 232 24,683 33,000 33,000 33,500 33,500 4311 Swim Lessons 16,383 (64) 19,112 20,600 21,000 22,000 23,100 4312 Concessions 4,296 - 5,414 8,000 5,000 5,500 5,775 4313 Pool Rentals 480 - 14,402 500 15,000 15,000 15,750 5110 Redwood Rentals - 8,570 21,702 - 24,500 - - 54,690 8,738 85,313 62,100 98,500 76,000 78,125 Expenditures: Salaries&Wages 61,943 - 81,141 59,500 66,500 80,295 82,705 Employee Benefits 9,060 - 11,261 8,270 9,260 11,405 12,015 Supplies 6,650 525 9,291 6,600 7,300 6,700 6,965 (Contractual Services 17,948 7,169 17,339 19,450 19,250 18,400 19,420 Utilities 4,045 1,963 3,653 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,600 Repairs&Maintenance 2,882 567 3,140 5,000 5,500 4,000 4,500 Training/Travel/Dues 3,623 (263) 4,636 3,550 3,800 4,100 4,290 Other Expenses 62 1,090 5 200 400 100 100 VISA/MC Charges 1,215 - 1,695 1,200 1,400 1,450 1,525 Items for Resale 3,611 - 4,022 4,000 2,000 3,000 3,250 Capital Outlay 26,872 - - - - - - Total Exp 137,911 11,051 136,183 112,270 119,910 133,950 139,370 Net addition to(use of) (83,221) (2,313) (50,870) (50,170) (21,410) (57,950) (61,245) general revenues City of Apple Valley 217 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) REDWOOD POOL 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6112-SALARY-SEASONAL TEMP 60,675 0 80,876 59,000 66,000 17,148 80,045 80,045 82,455 82,455 6124-OVERTIME-SEASONAL TEMP 1,269 0 264 500 500 23 250 250 250 250 6105-SALARIES AND WAGES 61,943 0 81,141 59,500 66,500 17,171 80,295 80,295 82,705 82,705 6138-MEDICARE 898 0 1,177 865 960 249 1,160 1,160 1,195 1,195 6139-FICA 3,840 0 5,031 3,690 4,125 1,065 4,965 4,965 5,110 5,110 6141-PENSIONS-PERA 287 0 0 0 6142-WORKERS COMPENSATION 3,302 0 5,054 3,715 4,175 1,078 5,280 5,280 5,710 5,710 6143-UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 732 0 0 0 6125-EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 9,060 0 11,261 8,270 9,260 2,392 11,405 11,405 12,015 12,015 6100-TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 71,003 0 92,402 67,770 75,760 19,563 91,700 91,700 94,720 94,720 6210-OFFICE SUPPLIES 149 0 39 87 6211-SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT 0 32 0 600 800 4 800 400 840 400 6214-CHEMICALS 194 0 0 100 100 0 110 0 115 0 6215-EQUIPMENT-PARTS 2,147 79 176 1,400 1,400 86 1,400 1,000 1,470 1,000 6229-GENERAL SUPPLIES 4,160 414 9,076 4,500 5,000 1,763 5,300 5,300 5,565 5,565 6205-SUPPLIES 6,650 525 9,291 6,600 7,300 1,940 7,610 6,700 7,990 6,965 6235-CONSULTANT SERVICES 0 5,500 0 0 0 0 6237-TELEPHONE/PAGERS 733 0 0 1,200 0 0 0 0 0 0 6239-PRINTING 120 0 336 350 350 211 400 400 420 420 6240-CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE 0 0 0 600 600 0 650 0 680 0 6249-OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 17,095 1,669 17,003 17,300 18,300 2,071 19,300 18,000 20,265 19,000 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 17,948 7,169 17,339 19,450 19,250 2,282 20,350 18,400 21,365 19,420 6256-UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS 4,045 1,963 3,653 4,500 4,500 2,713 4,500 4,500 4,725 4,600 6250-UTILITIES 4,045 1,963 3,653 4,500 4,500 2,713 4,500 4,500 4,725 4,600 6265-REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 2,607 52 1,605 2,500 3,000 0 3,200 2,200 3,360 2,560 6266-REPAIRS-BUILDING 275 515 1,329 2,500 2,500 0 2,700 1,800 2,835 1,940 6269-REPAIRS-OTHER 0 0 207 0 6260-REPAIRS AND MAINTENA 2,882 567 3,140 5,000 5,500 0 5,900 4,000 6,195 4,500 6275-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL 425 0 0 300 300 0 350 350 350 350 6277-MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE 0 0 0 50 0 0 6280-DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 1,930 -468 2,050 2,000 2,000 1,616 2,000 2,000 2,100 2,100 6281-UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 1,268 205 2,586 1,200 1,500 1,848 1,750 1,750 1,840 1,840 6270-TRNG/TRAVL/DUES/UNIF 3,623 -263 4,636 3,550 3,800 3,464 4,100 4,100 4,290 4,290 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 35,148 9,961 38,059 39,100 40,350 10,399 42,460 37,700 44,565 39,775 6333-GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS -54 0 -5 0 6351-VISA/BANK CHARGES 1,215 1,080 1,695 1,200 1,400 313 1,450 1,450 1,525 1,525 6399-OTHER CHARGES 115 10 10 200 400 0 400 100 400 100 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES 1,277 1,090 1,700 1,400 1,800 312 1,850 1,550 1,925 1,625 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES 1,277 1,090 1,700 1,400 1,800 312 1,850 1,550 1,925 1,625 6401-EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 6400-TOTAL EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 6540-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE 3,611 0 4,022 4,000 2,000 37 2,500 3,000 2,625 3,250 6501-TAXABLE/NON-TAXABLE MISC RESAL 3,611 0 4,022 4,000 2,000 37 2,500 3,000 2,625 3,250 6500-TOTAL EXPENDITURES 3,611 0 4,022 4,000 2,000 37 2,500 3,000 2,625 3,250 6735-CAPITAL OUTLAY-OTHER IMPROVEME 0 0 0 0 0 0 10,000 0 0 0 6740-CAPITAL OUTLAY-MACH/EQ/OTHER 26,872 0 0 0 0 0 6701-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 26,872 0 0 0 0 0 10,000 0 0 0 6700-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 26,872 0 0 0 0 0 10,000 0 0 0 City of Apple Valley 218 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) REDWOOD POOL 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 137,911 11,051 136,184 112,270 119,910 30,311 148,510 133,950 143,835 139,370 219 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 40: REDWOOD POOL-1930 COMPANY 1000: GENERAL FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND REVENUE 4310 Public Swimming 33,000 33,000 33,000 33,500 33,500 33,500 36,000 4311 Swim Lessons 20,600 21,000 21,000 22,000 22,000 23,100 24,000 4312 Concessions 8,000 5,000 5,000 5,500 6,000 5,775 6,500 4313 Pool Rentals - 15,000 15,000 15,000 18,000 15,750 20,000 5110 Building Rentals(moved to JC Activity Cntr - 24,500 24,500 - - - - Total 61,600 98,500 98,500 76,000 79,500 78,125 86,500 SALARIES 6112 Salary-Seasonal Temp 59,000 66,000 66,000 80,045 80,045 82,455 82,455 6124 Overtime-Seasonal Temp 500 500 500 250 250 250 250 6138 Medicare 865 960 960 1,160 1,160 1,195 1,195 6139 FICA 3,690 4,125 4,125 4,965 4,965 5,110 5,110 6142 Work Comp Ins 3,715 4,175 4,175 5,280 5,280 5,710 5,710 6145 Hospital&Life Insurance - - Total 67,770 75,760 75,760 91,700 91,700 94,720 94,720 6211 SMALL TOOL&EQUIPMENT Snack Bar Equipment 600 800 800 800 400 840 400 Total 600 800 800 800 400 840 400 6214 CHEMICALS Misc Chemicals 100 100 100 110 - 115 0 Total 100 100 100 _ 110 - 115 0 6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS Miscellaneous 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,000 1,470 1,000 Total 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,000 1,470 1,000 6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES Lifeguard Equipment 4,500 5,000 5,000 5,300 5,300 5,565 5,565 Total 4,500 5,000 5,000 5,300 5,300 5,565 5,565 6237 TELEPHONES Telephones 1,200 Total 1,200 - - - - - - 6239 PRINTING/PUBLISHING I Pool Passes,Flyers 350 350 350 400 400 420 420 Total 350 350 350 400 400 420 420 6240 CLEANING/GARBAGE SERVICE Miscellaneous 600 600 600 650 - 680 0 Total 600 600 600 650 - 680 0 6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES Water Management Program 16,000 17,000 17,000 18,000 16,700 18,900 17,635 When I Work Fees 300 300 300 300 300 315 315 W i Fi 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,050 1,050 Total 17,300 18,300 18,300 19,300 18,000 20,265 19,000 6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,725 4,600 Total 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,725 4,600 6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT Pumps,Filters,Wiring and Lights 2,500 3,000 3,000 3,200 2,200 3,360 2,560 Total 2,500 3,000 3,000 3,200 2,200 3,360 2,560 6266 REPAIRS-BUILDING General Items 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,700 1,800 2,835 1,940 Total 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,700 1,800 2,835 1,940 6275 SCHOOL/CONF/EXP-LOCAL I 1 First Aid Training,Lifeguard Certif. 300 300 300 350 350 350 350 Total _ 300 300 300 350 350 350 350 6277 MILEAGE ALLOWANCE Mileage-Pool staff 50 - Total 50 - - - - - - 6280 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS Misc and Red Cross Fees 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,100 2,100 Total 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,100 2,100 6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE Swim Suits&Attendant/Lifeguard Shirts 1,200 1,500 1,500 1,750 1,750 1,840 1,840 Total 1,200 1,500 1,500 1,750 1,750 1,840 1,840 6351 VISA/MC CHARGES Credit Card Charges 1,200 1,400 1,400 1,450 1,450 1,525 1,525 Total 1,200 1,400 1,400 1,450 1,450 1,525 1,525 6399 OTHER CHARGES Miscellaneous 200 400 400 100 400 100 Total 200 400 - 400 100 400 100 220 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 40: REDWOOD POOL-1930 COMPANY 1000: GENERAL FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND 6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALEI I Concession Operation Product 4,000 2,000 2,000 2,500 3,000 2,625 3,250 Total 4,000 2,000 2,000 _ 2,500 3,000 2,625 3,250 6735 CAPITAL OUTLAY-OTHER IMPROV Funbrellas 10,000 - Total - - - 10,000 - - - Total Net of Personnel 44,500 44,150 43,750 56,810 42,250 49,115 44,650 TOTAL EXPENSES $ 112,270 $ 119,910 $ 119,510 $ 148,510 $ 133,950 $ 143,835 $ 139,370 221 COMPANY DEPARTMENT BUSINESS UNIT ACTIVITY 1000 41 1845 Recreation Self-Supported Programs DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY The self-supported programs are those that have greater revenue than expenses. Examples include Adult Athletic Leagues, Adult Open Gym Programs, Youth Camps, and Pre-School Programs. MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2023 & 2024 Continue to evaluate trends in adult athletics, open gym programs and preschool classes to proactively promote recreational opportunities to help people of the community achieve fuller, happier, and effective lives. Build on positive momentum with the adult bean bag leagues. Expand days that leagues are offered and continue partnership with Valleywood Golf Course. The adult softball program continues to see a downward trend which matches state-wide softball team numbers. While the program contracts, staff have and will continue to fill some available fields with rentals which often more than offset lost net revenue from declining team numbers. Offer additional adult athletic leagues in current trend areas. Expand on popular camp offerings to have more week long programs for youth. IMPACT MEASURES / PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual Actual Actual Projected Projected Projected Item 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Indoor Open Adult Athletics (volleyball, pickleball, 11,655 1,284 3,185 10,440 10,935 11,475 badminton) Adult Athletic Softball Teams 140 77 129 115 110 105 Adult Athletic Basketball Teams 6 4 4 6 6 6 Adult Athletic Volleyball Teams 286 168 208 282 288 288 Adult Athletic Kickball Teams 8 4 11 11 11 11 Adult Athletic Bean Bag Teams 32 63 68 81 96 96 Day Camp 157 28 100 125 150 150 Temporary Status Personnel Schedule— (Part-Time hours) Actual Actual Actual Proposed Proposed Proposed Position Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 General — 1845 175 97 49 385 300 300 Softball — 1850 1,570 462 740 300 775 775 Adult League Other- 1855 0 0 0 150 125 125 Volleyball — 1860 384 43 126 700 550 550 Day Camp— 1865 164 84 71 655 300 300 Basketball — 1870 51 29 25 150 65 65 Pre-School — 1875 936 399 1,016 1,200 1,100 1,100 Total 3,280 1,114 2,027 3,540 3,215 3,215 222 Summary Budget Department 41 -Recreation Self-Supported Programs 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Revenue: 4351 Pre School Programs 61,245 23,246 28,860 45,000 50,000 50,000 55,000 4355 Rec User Fees 57,706 20,080 32,335 79,000 60,000 50,000 45,000 4356 Rec League Entry Fees 140,492 80,827 107,747 163,000 140,000 130,000 135,000 4357 JCRP Concessions 8,131 - 9,000 - - 267,573 124,153 168,942 296,000 250,000 230,000 235,000 Expenditures: Salaries&Wages 45,607 17,729 33,705 51,000 43,315 54,280 55,910 Employee Benefits 7,300 3,178 5,970 5,075 4,320 5,410 5,635 Supplies 33,110 16,168 26,396 33,200 33,750 30,000 30,000 Contractual Services 101,315 63,344 61,434 100,700 101,300 80,000 80,000 Repairs&Maintenance - - - - - - - Training/Travel/Dues 315 (224) 224 975 950 600 650 Other Expenses 4,603 2,979 6,047 5,850 6,325 8,050 8,050 Items for Resale 6,940 501 - 4,500 - - - Capital Outlay - - - - - - Total Exp 199,190 103,676 133,776 201,300 189,960 178,340 180,245 Net addition to(use of) 68,383 20,477 35,166 94,700 60,040 51,660 54,755 general revenues 2023 CAPITAL OUTLAY: None 2024 CAPITAL OUTLAY: None City of Apple Valley 223 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) RECREATION SELF-SUPPORTED PROG 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6110-SALARY-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 216 0 0 0 6111-SALARY PART-TIME 0 0 114 0 0 0 6112-SALARY-SEASONAL TEMP 44,871 17,729 33,591 51,000 43,315 21,789 54,280 54,280 55,910 55,910 6113-OVERTIME-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 519 0 0 0 6123-SALARY-OTHER 0 0 6105-SALARIES AND WAGES 45,607 17,729 33,705 51,000 43,315 21,789 54,280 54,280 55,910 55,910 6138-MEDICARE 661 257 489 740 630 316 785 785 810 810 6139-FICA 2,828 1,099 2,090 3,160 2,685 1,351 3,365 3,365 3,465 3,465 6141-PENSIONS-PERA 1,713 1,003 1,689 0 0 1,247 6142-WORKERS COMPENSATION 2,079 818 1,703 1,175 1,005 1,263 1,260 1,260 1,360 1,360 6143-UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 20 0 0 0 6125-EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 7,300 3,178 5,970 5,075 4,320 4,176 5,410 5,410 5,635 5,635 6100-TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 52,907 20,907 39,675 56,075 47,635 25,965 59,690 59,690 61,545 61,545 6210-OFFICE SUPPLIES 30 0 0 0 6211-SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6229-GENERAL SUPPLIES 33,080 16,168 26,396 33,200 33,750 13,172 33,850 30,000 33,450 30,000 6205-SUPPLIES 33,110 16,168 26,396 33,200 33,750 13,172 33,850 30,000 33,450 30,000 6235-CONSULTANT SERVICES 54,089 34,702 42,865 57,800 57,800 16,858 54,200 42,700 42,700 42,700 6239-PRINTING 1,187 1,460 45 2,100 2,000 0 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 6240-CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE 95 50 0 0 6249-OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 45,944 27,132 18,524 40,800 41,500 2,393 42,500 35,300 35,900 35,300 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 101,315 63,344 61,434 100,700 101,300 19,250 98,700 80,000 80,600 80,000 6260-REPAIRS AND MAINTENA 0 0 0 0 0 0 6277-MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE 0 21 0 300 300 0 350 150 370 150 6280-DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 315 -275 224 75 0 0 0 0 0 0 6281-UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 0 30 0 600 650 244 650 450 700 500 6270-TRNG/TRAVL/DUES/UNIF 315 -224 224 975 950 244 1,000 600 1,070 650 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 134,740 79,288 88,054 134,875 136,000 32,666 133,550 110,600 115,120 110,650 6310-RENTAL EXPENSE 400 132 0 800 550 140 550 300 550 300 6333-GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS -2 0 -8 0 6351-VISA/BANK CHARGES 1,064 550 3,474 2,590 0 3,500 0 3,500 6399-OTHER CHARGES 3,141 2,296 2,581 5,050 5,775 2,167 6,580 4,250 4,250 4,250 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES 4,603 2,979 6,047 5,850 6,325 4,897 7,130 8,050 4,800 8,050 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES 4,603 2,979 6,047 5,850 6,325 4,897 7,130 8,050 4,800 8,050 6540-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE 6,940 501 0 4,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 6501-TAXABLE/NON-TAXABLE MISC RESAL 6,940 501 0 4,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 6500-TOTAL EXPENDITURES 6,940 501 0 4,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 199,190 103,676 133,776 201,300 189,960 63,527 200,370 178,340 181,465 180,245 224 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 41: RECREATION SELF-SUPPORTED PROGRAMS-1845 COMPANY 1000: GENERAL FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND REVENUE 4351 Pre-School Programs 45,000 50,000 50,000 55,000 50,000 60,000 55,000 4355 Recreation User Fees 79,000 60,000 65,000 50,000 45,000 Adult Open Gym Punch Cards 23,585 30,000 Badminton Daily Admission 2,864 5,000 Badminton Old Punch Card 444 Volleyball Daily Admission 11,305 15,000 Volleyball Old Punch Card 360 Pickleball Daily Admission 4,470 8,000 Pickleball Old Punch Card 705 4356 Recreation League Entry Fees 163,000 140,000 145,000 130,000 135,000 Softball 79,565 75,000 Volleyball 40,080 53,000 Bean Bags 4,320 4,000 Kickball 2,035 2,000 Basketball 3,510 4,000 4357 JCRP Concessions 9,000 - - - Total 296,000 250,000 223,243 265,000 230,000 256,000 235,000 SALARIES 6111 Salary-Parttime 6112 Salary-Seasonal Temp 51,000 43,315 43,315 54,280 54,280 55,910 55,910 6123 Salary-Other - - - 6138 Medicare 740 630 630 785 785 810 810 6139 FICA 3,160 2,685 2,685 3,365 3,365 3,465 3,465 6141 Pension-PERA - - - 6142 Work Comp Ins 1,175 1,005 1,005 1,260 1,260 1,360 1,360 Total 56,075 47,635 47,635 59,690 59,690 61,545 61,545 6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES Softball Programs 17,000 15,000 11,640 15,000 15,000 12,700 12,700 Volleyball Programs 6,000 8,000 7,650 8,000 8,000 9,300 9,300 Bean Bags Programs 1,054 1,100 1,100 Day Camp Programs 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 Basketball Programs 500 500 150 500 500 200 200 Preschool Programs 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,100 3,100 Youth&Adult Misc Programs 4,500 5,000 5,000 5,100 5,100 5,200 5,200 Kickball Programs 700 750 325 750 750 350 350 Trend Reduction - - - - (3,850) (3,450) Total 33,200 33,750 30,319 33,850 30,000 33,450 30,000 6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES Umpires-Softball 49,000 49,000 34,281 45,000 33,500 33,500 33,500 Officials-Volleyball 6,000 6,000 6,264 6,400 9,200 9,200 9,200 Officials-Basketball 2,800 2,800 1,827 2,800 - Total 57,800 57,800 42,372 54,200 42,700 42,700 42,700 6239 PRINTING/PUBLISHING Tri-fold Advertising Brochure 900 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Flyers,etc.-Mid Winter Fest 1,200 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Total 2,100 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES Youth&Adult Programs 25,500 27,500 26,600 27,100 19,400 20,000 19,400 Adult League Software 900 900 900 900 900 Day Camp Programs 3,300 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 Preschool Programs 12,000 12,500 12,500 13,000 13,500 13,500 13,500 Total 40,800 41,500 41,500 42,500 35,300 35,900 35,300 6277 MILEAGE Mileage 300 300 300 350 150 370 150 Total 300 300 300 350 150 370 150 6280 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS Health Dept License-JCRP 75 - - - Total 75 - - - - - - 6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE Staff Shirts-Leagues 100 150 - 150 100 150 100 Staff Shirts-Program Staff 500 500 500 500 350 550 400 Total 600 650 500 650 450 700 500 6310 RENTAL EXPENSE General Recreation 800 550 550 550 300 550 300 Total 800 550 550 550 300 550 300 6351 VISA/MC CREDIT CARD FEES 3,500 3,500 - - - - 3,500 - 3,500 225 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 41: RECREATION SELF-SUPPORTED PROGRAMS-1845 COMPANY 1000: GENERAL FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP _ RECOMMEND 6399 OTHER CHARGES Team Reg-Softball 2,400 3,000 1,836 2,700 1,700 1,700 1,700 Team Tournament-Softball 1,400 1,400 - 1,400 - - - Team Reg-Volleyball 250 275 294 280 300 300 300 New Activities-Adult Athletics 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 New Activities-Youth&Adult Program 1,000 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,150 1,150 1,150 Total 5,050 5,775 3,230 6,580 4,250 4,250 4,250 6540 CONCESSIONS FOR RESALE JCRP Concession Operation 3,700 - - - - Teen Concession Operation 800 - - - Total 4,500 - - - - Total Net of Personnel 145,225 142,325 120,771 140,680 118,650 119,920 118,700 TOTAL EXPENSES $ 201,300 $ 189,960 $ 168,406 $ 200,370 $ 178,340 $ 181,465 $ 180,245 226 ••• •••• ••••• ••• AppValley Notes: 227 COMPANY DEPARTMENT BUSINESS UNIT ACTIVITY 1000 42 1900 AV Community Center DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY Expenses associated with the Apple Valley Community Center operations, which serves as the headquarters to the Parks and Recreation Department. It features meeting rooms, gymnasiums (hardwood and sport court flooring), a pre-school room and a warming house during the winter season. MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2023 & 2024 Continue to rebuild the customer base after the shutdowns and COVID distancing rules. Change gym schedule to better fit needs and maximize efficiency and revenue Streamline the check in process for all programs. Maximize the scheduling of the building to meet the needs of the community in programming and rental space. Restructure gym time as adult league numbers change. Continue to improve the aesthetics of the building. IMPACT MEASURES / PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual Actual Actual Projected Projected Projected Item 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Rental Revenue $77,174 $37,642 $61,370 $81,000 $81,000 $81,000 Door Counts 122,910 44,041 52,389 110,000 110,000 110,000 Regular Status Personnel Schedule —FTE's Actual Actual Actual Proposed Proposed Proposed Position Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Maintenance II 1 1 1 1 1 1 Total 1 1 1 1 1 1 Temporary Status Personnel Schedule —(# Hours Part Time) Actual Actual Actual Proposed Proposed Proposed Position Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Custodian 478 239 206 800 350 350 Facility Attendant 1,879 716 846 3,000 2,000 2,000 Facility Supervisor 3,496 1,229 2,140 3,000 3,200 3,200 Total 5,853 2,185 3,192 6,800 5,550 5,550 228 Summary Budget Department 42-AV Community Center 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Revenue: 4358 Vending Commissions 834 704 315 3,000 3,000 1,000 1,000 5115 Rentals 77,174 37,642 61,370 81,000 81,000 75,000 75,000 78,008 38,345 61,685 84,000 84,000 76,000 76,000 Expenditures: Salaries&Wages 141,131 107,846 128,211 164,515 182,175 180,175 185,575 Employee Benefits 36,010 34,667 41,956 44,935 44,935 43,335 45,180 Supplies 17,482 12,112 14,957 18,100 18,600 17,000 17,000 Contractual Services 8,898 8,096 6,646 9,500 9,500 8,000 8,000 Utilities 43,008 38,804 37,773 45,000 44,000 45,400 45,400 Repairs&Maintenance 19,799 22,079 6,858 22,000 22,000 15,000 16,000 Training/Travel/Dues 1,599 1,098 2,173 1,500 1,500 2,000 2,000 Other Expenses 3,565 (11) 56 - - - - Visa/MC Charges 4,495 4,121 7,442 4,000 4,000 6,000 6,000 Total Exp 275,987 228,812 246,072 309,550 326,710 316,910 325,155 Net addition(use)of general (198,813) (191,170) (184,702) (228,550) (245,710) (241,910) (250,155) revenues Park Facilities Fund 4820 2023 2024 Gym Ceiling Fans Replacement 27,000 Flooring 10,000 Entry Doors 40,000 Interior Doors 30,000 Skylight Replacement 200,000 Replace Plumbing Fixtures 50,000 Replace hydronic radiators 100,000 Total 45,000 430,000 City of Apple Valley 229 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) AV COMMUNITY CENTER 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES 8,060 4,110 7,499 4,000 4,000 1,857 4,000 6,000 4,000 6,000 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES 8,060 4,110 7,499 4,000 4,000 1,857 4,000 6,000 4,000 6,000 6401-EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 6400-TOTAL EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 6501-TAXABLE/NON-TAXABLE MISC RESAL 0 0 0 0 6500-TOTAL EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 6735-CAPITAL OUTLAY-OTHER IMPROVEME 0 0 0 0 0 0 18,000 0 0 0 6701-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 0 0 0 0 0 0 18,000 0 0 0 6700-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 0 0 0 0 0 0 18,000 0 0 0 275,987 228,812 246,072 309,550 326,710 162,412 344,010 316,910 333,255 325,155 City of Apple Valley 230 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) AV COMMUNITY CENTER 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6110-SALARY-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 38,203 63,804 69,749 67,485 68,805 34,774 76,180 76,180 78,440 78,440 6111-SALARY PART-TIME 10,356 2,524 0 18,500 13,600 0 0 0 0 0 6112-SALARY-SEASONAL TEMP 91,553 41,518 58,213 76,000 97,710 49,543 101,750 101,750 104,825 104,825 6113-OVERTIME-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 928 184 262 149 6121-INSURANCE CASH BENEFIT 0 0 0 600 6122-COMP REQUEST 0 -184 -14 0 6123-SALARY-OTHER 2,530 2,060 2,245 2,245 2,310 2,310 6124-OVERTIME-SEASONAL TEMP 92 0 0 0 6105-SALARIES AND WAGES 141,131 107,846 128,211 164,515 182,175 85,065 180,175 180,175 185,575 185,575 6138-MEDICARE 2,002 1,503 1,778 2,385 2,640 1,200 2,615 2,615 2,690 2,690 6139-FICA 8,562 6,414 7,602 10,200 11,295 5,132 11,170 11,170 11,505 11,505 6141-PENSIONS-PERA 7,925 6,861 8,362 10,015 8,650 5,435 6,385 6,385 6,575 6,575 6142-WORKERS COMPENSATION 6,497 3,366 4,483 3,785 4,215 3,801 4,170 4,170 4,510 4,510 6144-LONG-TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE 122 111 116 190 195 48 215 215 220 220 6145-MEDICAL INSURANCE 11,119 13,368 18,044 18,360 17,940 8,212 18,780 18,780 19,680 19,680 6146-DENTAL INSURANCE 582 1,230 1,565 715 6147-LIFE INSURANCE-BASIC 6 5 7 9 6170-EMPLOYEE PAID PREMIUMS -806 1,810 0 0 6125-EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 36,010 34,667 41,956 44,935 44,935 24,553 43,335 43,335 45,180 45,180 6100-TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 177,141 142,513 170,166 209,450 227,110 109,618 223,510 223,510 230,755 230,755 6210-OFFICE SUPPLIES 845 323 621 1,000 1,000 315 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6211-SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT 541 1,330 562 600 600 169 600 600 600 600 6215-EQUIPMENT-PARTS 1,039 303 982 500 500 0 500 500 500 500 6229-GENERAL SUPPLIES 15,058 10,157 12,792 16,000 16,500 6,494 16,500 14,900 16,500 14,900 6205-SUPPLIES 17,482 12,112 14,957 18,100 18,600 6,979 18,600 17,000 18,600 17,000 6235-CONSULTANT SERVICES 0 156 0 21 6237-TELEPHONE/PAGERS 833 836 777 1,000 0 349 0 0 0 0 6239-PRINTING 96 0 35 500 500 0 500 500 500 500 6240-CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE 5,585 3,826 3,588 5,000 5,500 2,260 5,500 4,500 5,500 4,500 6249-OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,383 3,278 2,246 3,000 3,500 6,601 3,500 3,000 3,500 3,000 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 8,898 8,096 6,646 9,500 9,500 9,230 9,500 8,000 9,500 8,000 6255-UTILITIES-ELECTRIC 26,764 25,092 22,430 28,000 27,000 11,884 28,000 22,000 28,000 22,000 6256-UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS 15,160 12,955 14,620 16,000 16,000 15,285 16,400 22,400 16,400 22,400 6257-UTILITIES-PROPANE/WATER/SEWER 1,084 758 723 1,000 1,000 414 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6250-UTILITIES 43,008 38,804 37,773 45,000 44,000 27,582 45,400 45,400 45,400 45,400 6265-REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 5,910 816 64 7,000 7,000 1,697 7,000 2,000 7,000 2,000 6266-REPAIRS-BUILDING 13,890 21,263 6,599 15,000 15,000 4,638 16,000 13,000 16,000 14,000 6269-REPAIRS-OTHER 0 0 195 0 0 0 6260-REPAIRS AND MAINTENA 19,799 22,079 6,858 22,000 22,000 6,335 23,000 15,000 23,000 16,000 6275-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL 0 145 0 55 6277-MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE 0 0 85 0 0 0 6280-DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 0 0 130 10 6281-UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 1,599 953 1,958 1,500 1,500 746 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 6270-TRNG/TRAVL/DUES/UNIF 1,599 1,098 2,173 1,500 1,500 811 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 90,787 82,190 68,407 96,100 95,600 50,937 98,500 87,400 98,500 88,400 6310-RENTAL EXPENSE 0 33 0 0 0 0 6333-GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS -75 -84 -51 -39 6349-LATE FEES/FINANCE CHARGES 2 0 6351-VISA/BANK CHARGES 4,495 4,121 7,442 4,000 4,000 1,896 4,000 6,000 4,000 6,000 6399-OTHER CHARGES 3,640 40 105 0 0 0 231 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 42: AV COMMUNITY CENTER-1900 COMPANY 1000: GENERAL FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND REVENUE 4358 Vending Commisions 3,000 3,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 2,000 1,000 5115 Rentals 81,000 81,000 81,000 81,000 75,000 81,000 75,000 Total 84,000 84,000 84,000 83,000 76,000 83,000 76,000 SALARIES I I 6110 Salaries Full Time 67,485 68,805 68,805 76,180 76,180 78,440 78,440 6111 Salary-Parttime 18,500 13,600 13,600 - - 6112 Salary-Seasonal Temporary 76,000 97,710 97,710 101,750 101,750 104,825 104,825 6123 Salary-Other 2,530 2,060 2,060 2,245 2,245 2,310 2,310 6138 Medicare 2,385 2,640 2,640 2,615 2,615 2,690 2,690 6139 FICA 10,200 11,295 11,295 11,170 11,170 11,505 11,505 6141 Pension-PERA 10,015 8,650 8,650 6,385 6,385 6,575 6,575 6142 Work Comp Insurance 3,785 4,215 4,215 4,170 4,170 4,510 4,510 6144 Long-term Disability Insurance 190 195 195 215 215 220 220 6145 Hospital&Life Insurance 18,360 17,940 17,940 18,780 18,780 19,680 19,680 Position Changes Total 209,450 227,110 227,110 223,510 223,510 230,755 230,755 6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Total 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6211 SMALL TOOL&EQUIPMENT Miscellaneous 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 Total 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 6215 EQUIPMENT PARTS Miscellaneous 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 Total 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 6229 GENERAL SUPPLIESI Cleaning Chemicals/Paper Products 16,000 16,500 16,500 16,500 14,900 16,500 14,900 AEDs - - - - - Total 16,000 16,500 16,500 16,500 14,900 16,500 14,900 6237 TELEPHONE Phones 1,000 - - - - Total 1,000 - - - - - - 6239 PRINTING/PUBLISHING AV Community Center Brochures - 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 Total 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 6240 C.SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVAL Garbage Removal/Clean Floors 5,000 5,500 5,500 5,500 4,500 5,500 4,500 Total 5,000 5,500 5,500 5,500 4,500 5,500 4,500 6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RPZ Inspection,fire monitoring,pests 3,000 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,000 3,500 3,000 Total 3,000 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,000 3,500 3,000 6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC 28,000 27,000 27,000 28,000 22,000 28,000 22,000 Total 28,000 27,000 27,000 28,000 22,000 28,000 22,000 6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,400 22,400 16,400 22,400 Total 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,4001 22,400 16,400 22,400 6257 UTILITIES-OTHER Propane,water/sewer 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Total _1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT Miscellaneous 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 2,000 7,000 2,000 Total 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 2,000 7,000 2,000 6266 REPAIRS-BUILDING 1 i Miscellaneous 15,000 15,000 15,000 16,000 13,000 16,000 14,000 Total _ 15,000 15,000 15,000 16,000 13,000 16,000 14,000 6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 1,500 1,500 1,500 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Total 1,500 1,500 1,500 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 6351 VISA/BANK CHARGES 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 6,000 4,000 6,000 Total 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 6,000 4,000 6,000 6735 CAPITAL OUTLAY-OTHER IMPROVEMENTS Basketball Backboards 8,000 - Maintenance Equipment 10,000 - Total - - - 18,000 - - - Total Net of Personnel 100,100 99,600 99,600 120,500 93,400 102,500 94,400 TOTAL EXPENSES $ 309,550 $ 326,710 $ 326,710 $ 344,010 $ 316,910 $ 333,255 $ 325,155 232 ••• •••• ••••• ••• AppValley Notes: 233 COMPANY DEPARTMENT BUSINESS UNIT ACTIVITY 1000 44 1940 Aquatic Swim Center DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY The Apple Valley Family Aquatic Center is a child friendly family water park located in Johnny Cake Ridge Park. It is operated by the Parks and Recreation Department as a general fund recreational facility. It contains two pools, a leisure pool and a lazy river pool, both of which have zero depth entries and are fully accessible. The capacity of the facility is 1,900 people. The facility operates 9 hours per day typically, weather permitting. Water play features are distributed around a zero depth entry in the leisure pool. The facility has six water slides, two of which require inner tubes and empty into the lazy river. There are additional sand play areas, picnic shelters and a large number of lounge chairs for patrons. A sprayground was added to the facility in 2021. The concession operation serves a variety of snack foods, fountain drinks and treats. MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2023 & 2024 Utilize the Aquatic Facilities Master Plan study to create a strategy for the City's long-term system needs, including a possible Parks and Recreation Bond Referendum in 2023. The study is intended to develop options, provide images of proposed improvements, create a priority list, and develop cost estimates associated with those improvements. 2024 represents the 25t" year of the AVFAC. We will plan to hold a celebration in recognition of this. IMPACT MEASURES / PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual Actual Actual Projected Projected Projected Rem 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Open Swim Attendance 49,155 Pool 53,950 64,000 55,000 55,000 Water Walkers/Lap Swim 5,091 Closed 8,770 5,800 5,000 5,000 Group Reservations 151 In '20 34* 150 160 160 Days Open 68 79 72 72 72 Average Daily Attendance 723 683 800 800 800 Net gain/(cost) per visitor $1.47 ($0.83) $1.07 $0.62 $0.65 * Group capacity limited in 2021 (COVID) Temporary Status Personnel Schedule - (Part-Time hours) Actual Actual Actual Proposed Proposed Proposed Position Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Facility Attendant 4,538 Pool 4,897 4,400 4,300 4,300 Lifeguard I 15,112 Closed 12,448 17,000 15,100 15,100 Lifeguard II 1,180 In '20 4,375 3,800 3,800 Head Guard 2,939 3,700 Pool Manager 1,492 1,819 1,500 1,400 1,400 Concession Supervisor 1,538 1,137 1,300 1,400 1,400 Total 26,799 24,675 27,900 26,000 26,000 234 Summary Budget Department 44-Aquatic Swim Center 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Proposed Proposed Proposed Revenue: 4330 Aquatic Swim Revenue 489,854 3,282 602,785 639,000 668,000 674,000 715,000 4331 Aquatic Concessions 97,007 - 126,244 110,000 110,000 120,000 125,000 5120 Aquatic Rentals 6,999 (1,587) - 15,000 15,000 15,000 17,000 593,861 1,695 729,029 764,000 793,000 809,000 857,000 Expenditures: Salaries&Wages 333,365 759 374,984 298,000 382,935 412,215 424,580 Employee Benefits 43,281 101 51,282 44,355 56,885 53,455 56,185 Supplies 29,212 19,023 45,250 33,500 33,700 39,000 41,975 Contractual Services 77,201 14,522 88,513 79,100 77,800 80,000 82,000 Utilities 78,142 18,424 85,468 81,000 81,000 81,000 85,050 Repairs&Maintenance 22,313 6,753 49,030 13,000 16,000 21,000 25,000 Training/Travel/Dues 10,878 (554) 6,679 8,700 9,350 10,000 12,000 Other Expenss 329 - (31) 500 400 50 50 Credit Card Fees 8,093 1,108 12,164 7,800 8,500 10,500 12,000 Items for Resale 47,387 - 59,827 59,000 58,000 50,000 52,000 Capital Outlay 47,281 238,942 - - 45,000 - - Total Exp 697,484 299,078 773,166 624,955 769,570 757,220 790,840 Net addition to(use of) (103,623) (297,383) (44,137) 139,045 23,430 51,780 66,160 general revenues Park Facilities Fund 4820 2023 2024 Pump Equipment Replacement 50,000 Leisure Pool Bathhouse Flooring 20,000 Replace Waterslides 50,000 Replace Slide Pump 30,000 Replace 30hp Pumps 60,000 Repair Plaster Walls 5,000 Replace Plaster Decking 78,000 Replace concession A/C 15,000 Replace Concrete Sidewalks 72,000 Total 100,000 330,000 City of Apple Valley 235 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) AQUATIC SWIM CENTER 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6111-SALARY PART-TIME 0 0 0 0 0 0 6112-SALARY-SEASONAL TEMP 331,690 759 369,641 298,000 382,935 57,066 412,215 412,215 424,580 424,580 6114-OVERTIME PART-TIME EMPLOYEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6124-OVERTIME-SEASONAL TEMP 1,676 0 5,343 16 6105-SALARIES AND WAGES 333,365 759 374,984 298,000 382,935 57,081 412,215 412,215 424,580 424,580 6138-MEDICARE 4,834 11 5,437 4,340 5,555 828 5,975 5,975 6,155 6,155 6139-FICA 20,669 47 23,249 18,570 23,740 3,539 20,290 20,290 20,625 20,625 6141-PENSIONS-PERA 119 0 2 0 6142-WORKERS COMPENSATION 17,660 43 22,594 21,445 27,590 3,594 27,190 27,190 29,405 29,405 6125-EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 43,281 101 51,282 44,355 56,885 7,960 53,455 53,455 56,185 56,185 6100-TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 376,647 860 426,266 342,355 439,820 65,042 465,670 465,670 480,765 480,765 6210-OFFICE SUPPLIES 360 0 405 500 500 363 500 500 525 500 6211-SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT 182 573 1,426 1,500 1,500 805 1,000 1,000 1,050 1,050 6214-CHEMICALS 2,156 5,325 3,906 4,300 4,400 2,197 5,000 5,000 5,250 5,250 6215-EQUIPMENT-PARTS 8,537 1,502 13,175 2,200 2,300 617 4,000 4,000 4,200 4,200 6229-GENERAL SUPPLIES 17,977 11,623 26,339 25,000 25,000 7,471 30,000 28,500 31,500 30,975 6205-SUPPLIES 29,212 19,023 45,250 33,500 33,700 11,453 40,500 39,000 42,525 41,975 6235-CONSULTANT SERVICES 0 0 0 0 0 0 6237-TELEPHONE/PAGERS 8,264 3,486 3,600 0 0 1,480 6239-PRINTING 473 0 913 500 500 109 500 500 525 525 6240-CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE 2,905 99 2,951 2,500 2,800 962 3,000 3,000 3,150 3,150 6249-OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 65,559 10,937 81,050 76,100 74,500 3,913 76,500 76,500 80,275 78,325 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 77,201 14,522 88,513 79,100 77,800 6,464 80,000 80,000 83,950 82,000 6255-UTILITIES-ELECTRIC 40,436 11,981 39,454 42,000 42,000 2,336 42,000 39,000 44,100 41,100 6256-UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS 30,736 3,408 35,457 31,000 31,000 12,014 31,000 34,000 32,550 35,550 6257-UTILITIES-PROPANE/WATER/SEWER 6,970 3,035 10,557 8,000 8,000 0 8,000 8,000 8,400 8,400 6250-UTILITIES 78,142 18,424 85,468 81,000 81,000 14,350 81,000 81,000 85,050 85,050 6265-REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 15,702 3,972 23,058 9,000 10,000 7,025 15,000 15,000 15,750 14,900 6266-REPAIRS-BUILDING 2,855 395 611 2,000 3,000 225 3,000 3,000 10,950 6,950 6269-REPAIRS-OTHER 3,756 2,385 25,361 2,000 3,000 1,068 3,000 3,000 3,150 3,150 6260-REPAIRS AND MAINTENA 22,313 6,753 49,030 13,000 16,000 8,319 21,000 21,000 29,850 25,000 6275-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL 170 49 300 500 600 25 1,000 1,000 1,050 2,510 6277-MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE 131 0 34 200 250 0 250 250 265 265 6280-DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 3,047 -903 2,879 3,000 3,000 1,307 4,000 4,000 4,200 4,200 6281-UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 7,530 300 3,467 5,000 5,500 7,292 5,500 4,750 5,775 5,025 6270-TRNG/TRAVL/DUES/UNIF 10,878 -554 6,679 8,700 9,350 8,624 10,750 10,000 11,290 12,000 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 217,746 58,168 274,941 215,300 217,850 49,210 233,250 231,000 252,665 246,025 6310-RENTAL EXPENSE 200 0 0 200 300 175 0 0 0 0 6320-REFUNDS&REIMBURSEMENTS 0 0 0 0 0 0 6333-GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS -11 -12 -37 -5 6349-LATE FEES/FINANCE CHARGES 0 0 1 0 6351-VISA/BANK CHARGES 8,093 1,080 12,164 8,000 8,500 46 10,000 10,500 10,500 12,000 6399-OTHER CHARGES 140 40 5 100 100 0 100 50 105 50 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES 8,422 1,108 12,132 8,300 8,900 216 10,100 10,550 10,605 12,050 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES 8,422 1,108 12,132 8,300 8,900 216 10,100 10,550 10,605 12,050 6401-EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 6400-TOTAL EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 6540-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE 47,387 0 59,827 59,000 58,000 9,956 50,000 50,000 52,500 52,000 6501-TAXABLE/NON-TAXABLE MISC RESAL 47,387 0 59,827 59,000 58,000 9,956 50,000 50,000 52,500 52,000 City of Apple Valley 236 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) AQUATIC SWIM CENTER 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6500-TOTAL EXPENDITURES 47,387 0 59,827 59,000 58,000 9,956 50,000 50,000 52,500 52,000 6735-CAPITAL OUTLAY-OTHER IMPROVEME 0 5,800 0 0 0 6740-CAPITAL OUTLAY-MACH/EQ/OTHER 47,281 233,142 0 0 45,000 0 40,000 0 20,000 0 6701-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 47,281 238,942 0 0 45,000 0 40,000 0 20,000 0 6700-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 47,281 238,942 0 0 45,000 0 40,000 0 20,000 0 697,484 299,078 773,166 624,955 769,570 124,424 799,020 757,220 816,535 790,840 237 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 44: AQUATIC SWIM CENTER-1940 COMPANY 1000: GENERAL FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT DEPT ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP PROP REVENUES 4330 Aquatic Swimming 639,000 668,000 668,000 668,000 674,000 701,400 715,000 4331 Aquatic Concessions 130,000 110,000 110,000 115,000 120,000 120,750 125,000 5120 Aquatic Rentals 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,750 17,000 Total 784,000 793,000 793,000 798,000 809,000 837,900 857,000 SALARIES 6112 Salary-Seasonal Temp 298,000 382,935 382,935 412,215 412,215 424,580 424,580 6138 Medicare 4,340 5,555 5,555 5,975 5,975 6,155 6,155 6139 FICA 18,570 23,740 23,740 20,290 20,290 20,625 20,625 6142 Work Comp Insurance 21,445 27,590 27,590 27,190 27,190 29,405 29,405 Total 342,355 439,820 439,820 465,670 465,670 480,765 480,765 6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES 500 500 500 500 500 525 500 Total 500 500 500 500 500 525 500 6211 SMALL TOOL&EQUIPMENT 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,000 1,000 1,050 1,050 Total 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,000 1,000 1,050 1,050 6214 CHEMICALS Cleaning Fluid,Chlorine,etc. 4,300 4,400 4,400 5,000 5,000 5,250 5,250 Total 4,300 4,400 4,400 5,000 5,000 5,250 5,250 6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS 2,200 2,300 2,300 4,000 4,000 4,200 4,200 Total 2,200 2,300 2,300 4,000 4,000 4,200 4,200 6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES Lifeguard Equipment 15,000 15,000 15,000 10,000 10,000 10,500 10,500 Chairs,Tubes,Funbrella Canvas 10,000 10,000 10,000 20,000 18,500 21,000 20,475 Total 25,000 25,000 25,000 30,000 28,500 31,500 30,975 6239 PRINTING/PUBLISHING Passes,Flyers,etc. 500 500 500 500 500 525 525 Total 500 500 500 500 500 525 525 6240 GARBAGE SERVICE 2,500 2,800 2,800 3,000 3,000 3,150 3,150 Total 2,500 2,800 2,800 3,000 3,000 3,150 3,150 6249 CONTRACTUAL SERVICE Water Management Program 67,000 73,000 73,000 75,000 75,000 78,750 76,800 Floor Resurfacing 7,100 - - Employee Scheduling App 1,000 500 500 500 500 525 525 Boiler Inspections 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Total 76,100 74,500 74,500 76,500 76,500 80,275 78,325 6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC 42,000 42,000 42,000 42,000 39,000 44,100 41,100 Total 42,000 42,000 42,000 42,000 39,000 44,100 41,100 6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS 31,000 31,000 31,000 31,000 34,000 32,550 35,550 Total 31,000 31,000 31,000 31,000 34,000 32,550 35,550 6257 UTILITIES-PROPANE&WATER 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,400 8,400 Total 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,400 8,400 6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT Pumps,Filters,Wiring and Lights 9,000 10,000 10,000 15,000 15,000 15,750 14,900 Total 9,000 10,000 10,000 15,000 15,000 15,750 14,900 6266 REPAIRS-BUILDINGS Lazy River Crack Repairs 3,800 3,800 Replace Exterior Hollow Metal Doors 2,600 - Replace Main Pool Mechanical Building 1,400 - Miscellaneous 2,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,150 3,150 Total 2,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 10,950 6,950 6269 REPAIRS-OTHER Miscellaneous 2,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,150 3,150 Total 2,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,150 3,150 6275 SCHOOL/CONF/EXP-LOCAL First Aid Training,Lifeguard Cert. 500 600 600 1,000 1,000 1,050 2,510 Total 500 600 600 1,000 1,000 1,050 2,510 6277 MILEAGE ALLOWANCE Mileage-Pool staff 200 250 250 250 250 265 265 Total 200 250 250 250 250 265 265 6280 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS American Red Cross 3,000 3,000 3,000 4,000 4,000 4,200 4,200 Total 3,000 3,000 3,000 4,000 4,000 4,200 4,200 6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE Swim Suits/Staff Apparel 5,000 5,500 5,500 5,500 4,750 5,775 5,025 Total 5,000 5,500 5,500 5,500 4,750 5,775 5,025 6310 RENTAL EXPENSE Pool Rentals for Preseason Trainings 200 300 300 - - - - Total 200 300 300 - - - - 238 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 44: AQUATIC SWIM CENTER-1940 COMPANY 1000: GENERAL FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT DEPT ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP PROP 6399 OTHER CHARGES 100 100 100 100 50 105 50 Total 100 100 100 100 50 105 50 6351 VISA/Bank Charges 8,000 8,500 8,500 10,000 10,500 10,500 12,000 Total 8,000 8,500 8,500 10,000 10,500 10,500 12,000 6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE Pop and Concessions 59,000 58,000 58,000 50,000 50,000 52,500 52,000 Total 59,000 58,000 58,000 50,000 50,000 52,500 52,000 6740 CAPITAL OUTLAY-OTHER ITEMS Rental Cabanas 20,000 20,000 Convection Oven 10,000 10,000 Concession Improvements 15,000 15,000 Lifeguard Sun Protection 20,000 - Shade Canopies 15,000 - Concession Window Menu Screens 5,000 - Walk-In Cooler 20,000 - Total - 45,000 45,000 40,000 - 20,000 - Total Net of Personnel 282,600 329,750 329,750 333,350 291,550 335,770 310,075 TOTAL EXPENSES $ 624,955 $ 769,570 $ 769,570 $ 799,020 $ 757,220 $ 816,535 $ 790,840 239 COMPANY DEPARTMENT BUSINESS UNIT ACTIVITY 1000 45 1920 Apple Valley Senior Center DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY Expenses related to the operation of the Apple Valley Senior Center. The Senior Center provides modern amenities and areas for meetings and special events with seating for up to 224 in the 21,000 square foot facility. MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2023 & 2024 Continue to rebuild customer base for rentals after the shutdown due to Covid-19. Utilize the facility to serve the recreational interests of the senior population and increase membership, offering up late day activities for the working seniors. Implement CivicRec to gather data — streamline the check in process for senior activities. Update Senior Center aesthetics. Work on creative ways to market the facility to increase rentals. IMPACT MEASURES / PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual Actual Actual Projected Projected Projected Item 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Senior Center Members 965 610 900 950 950 950 Large Event Rentals 75 28 50 75 90 90 Meeting Room Rentals 121 24 150 175 185 185 Regular Status Personnel Schedule — FTE's Actual Actual Actual Proposed Proposed Proposed Position Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Recreation Supervisor II 1 1 1 1 1 1 Maintenance II 1 1 1 1 1 1 Facility Coordinator 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 Total 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 Temporary Status Personnel Schedule— (Part-Time hours) Actual Actual Actual Proposed Proposed Proposed Position Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Custodian 407 513 48 600 400 400 Facility Supervisor 297 32 497 700 500 500 Total 704 545 545 1,300 900 900 240 Summary Budget Department 45-Apple Valley Senior Center 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Revenue: 5116 Rentals 55,331 9,685 41,158 70,000 70,000 60,000 60,000 4359 Rec Sr Rev-Reimburse (346) (765) - 1,000 1,000 - - 4360 Rec Senior Programs 27,247 4,506 7,275 29,500 29,000 30,000 30,000 82,232 13,426 48,433 100,500 100,000 90,000 90,000 Expenditures: Salaries&Wages 241,107 207,405 219,422 248,665 248,965 261,430 272,755 Employee Benefits 75,412 61,327 54,335 75,335 66,560 66,420 70,700 Supplies 16,556 6,932 6,840 12,550 15,200 12,000 12,500 Contractual Services 25,019 15,354 16,901 28,550 28,550 25,350 26,700 Utilities 22,677 21,725 23,032 24,100 24,300 24,000 25,000 Repairs&Maintenance 7,287 26,636 7,559 29,000 29,500 15,000 16,000 (Training/Travel/Dues 1,155 949 1,651 1,610 1,760 2,000 2,000 Other Expenses 277 485 582 150 800 200 550 Credit Card Fees - - 948 - - 1,000 1,000 Capital Outlay 25,670 - 6,080 - - - - Total Exp 415,158 340,814 337,350 419,960 415,635 407,400 427,205 Net addition to(use of) (332,926) (327,388) (288,917) (319,460) (315,635) (317,400) (337,205) general revenues Park Facilities Fund 4820 2023 2024 Gutter Repair& Downspouts 20,000 Storage Shed 10,000 Flooring Glacier, Library 15,000 Flooring Sequoia, Denali 20,000 Flooring-Restrooms 30,000 Ice Machine Addition 7,500 Irrigation 7,000 Total 102,500 7,000 City of Apple Valley 241 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) APPLE VALLEY SENIOR CENTER 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6110-SALARY-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 149,697 130,382 148,244 154,735 148,375 69,487 160,595 160,595 167,995 167,995 6111-SALARY PART-TIME 74,653 63,275 58,445 67,365 74,080 30,307 73,935 73,935 76,910 76,910 6112-SALARY-SEASONAL TEMP 16,757 12,470 12,013 20,000 19,450 5,244 19,540 19,540 20,130 20,130 6113-OVERTIME-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 999 675 0 109 6114-OVERTIME PART-TIME EMPLOYEES 0 148 0 0 6121-INSURANCE CASH BENEFIT 0 600 720 360 6122-COMP REQUEST -999 -145 0 0 6123-SALARY-OTHER 6,565 7,060 7,360 7,360 7,720 7,720 6105-SALARIES AND WAGES 241,107 207,405 219,422 248,665 248,965 105,508 261,430 261,430 272,755 272,755 6138-MEDICARE 3,304 2,925 3,208 3,610 3,610 1,541 3,790 3,790 3,955 3,955 6139-FICA 14,125 12,508 13,719 15,420 15,435 6,590 16,210 16,210 16,910 16,910 6141-PENSIONS-PERA 17,542 15,473 15,690 17,900 17,980 7,849 18,140 18,140 18,945 18,945 6142-WORKERS COMPENSATION 7,511 5,392 5,890 5,720 5,765 3,408 7,250 7,250 7,925 7,925 6144-LONG-TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE 301 261 131 440 420 56 455 455 475 475 6145-MEDICAL INSURANCE 41,742 30,894 13,439 32,245 31,450 4,103 28,875 28,875 30,790 30,790 6146-DENTAL INSURANCE 3,129 2,623 1,565 715 6147-LIFE INSURANCE-BASIC 12 10 7 9 6148-LIFE INSURANCE-SUPP/DEPEND 879 83 686 314 6170-EMPLOYEE PAID PREMIUMS -13,132 -8,842 0 0 -8,100 0 -8,300 -8,300 -8,300 -8,300 6125-EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 75,412 61,327 54,335 75,335 66,560 24,585 66,420 66,420 70,700 70,700 6100-TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 316,518 268,733 273,757 324,000 315,525 130,093 327,850 327,850 343,455 343,455 6210-OFFICE SUPPLIES 101 179 508 100 200 363 300 300 550 500 6211-SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT 809 292 1,935 1,500 4,000 184 1,500 1,500 4,400 1,500 6215-EQUIPMENT-PARTS 856 1,658 670 450 500 -185 2,000 1,800 2,000 1,800 6229-GENERAL SUPPLIES 14,790 4,803 3,726 10,500 10,500 3,373 11,200 8,400 12,100 8,700 6205-SUPPLIES 16,556 6,932 6,840 12,550 15,200 3,735 15,000 12,000 19,050 12,500 6235-CONSULTANT SERVICES 21 21 83 21 6237-TELEPHONE/PAGERS 615 620 1,071 650 650 499 650 650 700 700 6239-PRINTING 816 10 290 700 700 0 700 300 700 300 6240-CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE 2,010 1,828 1,691 2,700 2,700 1,067 2,700 2,700 2,975 2,975 6249-OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 21,558 12,874 13,766 24,500 24,500 13,812 26,000 21,700 20,100 22,725 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 25,019 15,354 16,901 28,550 28,550 15,398 30,050 25,350 24,475 26,700 6255-UTILITIES-ELECTRIC 18,757 18,250 18,544 20,000 20,000 9,862 20,400 19,575 20,000 19,925 6256-UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS 3,258 2,909 3,735 3,400 3,600 3,957 3,700 3,700 4,200 4,200 6257-UTILITIES-PROPANE/WATER/SEWER 661 567 753 700 700 228 725 725 875 875 6250-UTILITIES 22,677 21,725 23,032 24,100 24,300 14,046 24,825 24,000 25,075 25,000 6265-REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 2,575 8,427 817 4,000 4,500 2,241 4,600 2,600 5,000 2,600 6266-REPAIRS-BUILDING 4,712 18,209 6,742 25,000 25,000 2,426 25,000 12,400 20,000 13,400 6260-REPAIRS AND MAINTENA 7,287 26,636 7,559 29,000 29,500 4,667 29,600 15,000 25,000 16,000 6275-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL 0 0 15 300 350 90 350 350 375 350 6276-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP OTHER 522 0 0 0 6277-MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE 397 366 490 400 400 178 400 400 450 450 6280-DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 65 70 0 110 110 0 110 110 125 125 6281-UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 170 513 1,146 800 900 483 1,000 1,140 1,300 1,075 6270-TRNG/TRAVL/DUES/UNIF 1,155 949 1,651 1,610 1,760 750 1,860 2,000 2,250 2,000 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 72,693 71,596 55,983 95,810 99,310 38,597 101,335 78,350 95,850 82,200 6310-RENTAL EXPENSE 213 512 512 213 6333-GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS -37 -42 -30 -36 6351-VISA/BANK CHARGES 0 0 948 0 300 467 300 1,000 1,000 1,000 6399-OTHER CHARGES 100 15 100 150 500 130 200 200 550 550 City of Apple Valley 242 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) APPLE VALLEY SENIOR CENTER 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES 277 485 1,530 150 800 774 500 1,200 1,550 1,550 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES 277 485 1,530 150 800 774 500 1,200 1,550 1,550 6401-EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 6400-TOTAL EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 6725-CAPITAL OUTLAY-OFFICE EQUIP 0 0 6,080 0 6735-CAPITAL OUTLAY-OTHER IMPROVEME 25,670 0 0 0 0 0 55,000 0 340,000 0 6701-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 25,670 0 6,080 0 0 0 55,000 0 340,000 0 6700-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 25,670 0 6,080 0 0 0 55,000 0 340,000 0 415,158 340,814 337,350 419,960 415,635 169,464 484,685 407,400 780,855 427,205 243 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 45: APPLE VALLEY SENIOR CENTER-1920 COMPANY 1000: GENERAL FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND REVENUES 4359 Recreation Senior Revenue-Reimburse 1,000 1,000 1,000 - - - - 4360 Recreation Senior Programs 29,500 29,000 29,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 5116 Senior Center Rentals 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 60,000 70,000 60,000 Totals 100,500 100,000 100,000 100,000 90,000 100,000 90,000 SALARIES 6110 Regular Employees 154,735 148,375 148,375 160,595 160,595 167,995 167,995 6111 Salary-Parttime 67,365 74,080 74,080 73,935 73,935 76,910 76,910 6112 Salary-Seasonal 20,000 19,450 19,450 19,540 19,540 20,130 20,130 6110.1 Salary-Other 6,565 7,060 7,060 7,360 7,360 7,720 7,720 6138 Medicare 3,610 3,610 3,610 3,790 3,790 3,955 3,955 6139 FICA 15,420 15,435 15,435 16,210 16,210 16,910 16,910 6141 Pension-PERA 17,900 17,980 17,980 18,140 18,140 18,945 18,945 6142 Work Comp Insurance 5,720 5,765 5,765 7,250 7,250 7,925 7,925 6144 Long-term Disability Insurance 440 420 420 455 455 475 475 6145 Hospital&Life Insurance 32,245 31,450 31,450 28,875 28,875 30,790 30,790 6170 Employee Paid Premiums - (8,100) (8,100) (8,300) (8,300) (8,300) (8,300) Total 324,000 315,525 315,525 327,850 327,850 343,455 343,455 6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES 100 200 500 300 300 550 500 Total 100 200 500 300 300 550 500 6211 SMALL TOOL&EQUIPMENT 1,500 4,000 4,000 1,500 1,500 4,400 1,500 Total 1,500 4,000 4,000 1,500 1,500 4,400 1,500 6215 SMALL EQUIPMENT PARTS 450 500 1,500 2,000 1,800 2,000 1,800 Total 450 500 1,500 2,000 1,800 2,000 1,800 6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES Program Materials 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,700 4,250 6,000 4,350 Cleaning Chemicals/Paper Products 5,500 5,500 6,000 5,500 4,150 6,100 4,350 Total 10,500 10,500 11,000 11,200 8,400 12,100 8,700 6237 TELEPHONE Maintenance Cell Phone 650 650 650 650 650 700 700 Total 650 650 650 650 650 700 700 6239 PRINTING/PUBLISHING 700 700 700 700 300 700 300 Total 700 700 700 700 300 700 300 6240 C.SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVAL Garbage Removal/Clean Floors 2,700 2,700 2,700 2,700 2,700 2,975 2,975 Floor/Carpet Cleaning - Total 2,700 2,700 2,700 2,700 2,700 2,975 2,975 6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES Outing Fees&Instructors 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,300 12,000 12,000 12,000 Heating/Cooling Prevent.Maintenance 6,300 6,300 6,300 7,000 7,000 5,000 7,625 Controllers,Mechanical,Cooling Tower, Boiler Elevator Inspection 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,400 1,400 Alarm Monitoring 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,500 1,500 1,700 1,700 Total 24,500 24,500 24,500 26,000 21,700 20,100 22,725 6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,400 19,575 20,000 19,925 Total 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,400 19,575 20,000 19,925 6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS 3,400 3,600 3,800 3,700 3,700 4,200 4,200 Total 3,400 3,600 3,800 3,700 3,700 4,200 4,200 6257 UTILITIES-OTHER Water/Sewer/Propane 700 700 800 725 725 875 875 Total 700 700 800 725 725 875 875 6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT Miscellaneous 4,000 4,500 4,500 4,600 2,600 5,000 2,600 Total 4,000 4,500 4,500 4,600 2,600 5,000 2,600 6266 REPAIRS-BUILDING Miscellaneous Building Repairs 10,000 10,000 13,500 10,000 5,000 15,000 8,400 Pump Replacement, - - - - Energy Recovery Unit,Elevator, Kitchen Equipment HVAC 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 7,400 5,000 5,000 Total 25,000 25,000 28,500 25,000 12,400 20,000 13,400 6275 SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES 300 350 350 350 350 375 350 Total 300 350 350 350 350 375 350 6277 MILEAGE ALLOWANCE Part-Time Staff 400 400 400 400 400 450 450 Total 400 400 400 400 400 450 450 244 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 45: APPLE VALLEY SENIOR CENTER-1920 COMPANY 1000: GENERAL FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND 6280 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS MASS 110 110 110 110 110 125 125 Total 110 110 110 110 110 125 125 6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 800 900 1,200 1,000 1,140 1,300 1,075 Total 800 900 1,200 1,000 1,140 1,300 1,075 6399 OTHER CHARGES Miscellaneous 150 500 500 200 200 550 550 Total 150 500 500 200 200 550 550 6351 VISA/BANK CHARGES 300 1,000 300 1,000 1,000 1,000 Total - 300 1,000 300 1,000 1,000 1,000 6735 CAPITAL OUTLAY-OTHER IMPROV Gutter Repair&Downspouts 20,000 - Storage Shed(carryover from 2021) 10,000 10,000 - Back up Boiler(carryover from 2021) 25,000 HVAC Upgrades (carryover from 2021) 18,000 Rebuild Heating System Water Pump(carryover from 2021) 4,000 In-Floor Radiant Heat 5,000 - Water Softener Replacement Heat Pumps 20,000 - 340,000 - Total - - 57,000 55,000 - 340,000 - Total Net of Personnel 95,960 100,110 163,710 156,835 79,550 437,400 83,750 TOTAL EXPENSES $ 419,960 $ 415,635 $ 479,235 $ 484,685 $ 407,400 $ 780,855 $ 427,205 245 COMPANY DEPARTMENT BUSINESS UNIT ACTIVITY 1000 47 1950 Insurance DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY This Business Unit accounts for the unallocated property and workers compensation insurance charges for the General Fund. The city participates in the League of MN Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT). MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2023 and 2024 Work with staff to lower the Experience Modifiers for workers compensation and property/liability insurance. The trend in the worker compensation experience modifier has declined over the past few years based on a positive experience over the past few years. The property/liability premium increases 6.2% overall for the 2022/2023 premium year and the worker comp premium increased overall 9.0%. This is after the positive impact of the experience modifier dropping, the overall increase relates directly to a few significant rate increases in a few job classes occupied with a large number of employees, this is in addition to a decline in the deductible credits and premium discounts offered by the LMCIT. The proposed budgets include these rate increases. IMPACT MEASURES / PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual Actual Actual Projected Projected Projected Item 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Worker Comp Exp. Modifier .83 1.20 1.13 0.99 1.00 1.00 Liability Experience Modifier .89 .98 1.01 1.18 1.00 1.00 Auto Experience Modifier 1.00 1.15 1.15 1.00 1.10 1.10 (*)-New Experience Modifier Regular Status Personnel Schedule -FTE's Adopted Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Position Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 None Summary Budget Department 47 Insurance 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Proposed Proposed Proposed Expenditures: Salaries & Wages - - - - - - Employee Benefits - 1,212 - 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 Supplies - - - Insurance Premium 313,150 312,500 325,000 325,000 408,450 442,900 473,700 Capital Outlay - -Net provision to (use 313,150 313,712 325,000 337,000 420,450 454,900 485,700 of) general revenues 2023 and 2024 CAPITAL OUTLAY: None City of Apple Valley 246 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) INSURANCE 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6105-SALARIES AND WAGES 0 0 0 0 6143-UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0 1,212 0 12,000 12,000 0 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 6125-EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 0 1,212 0 12,000 12,000 0 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 6100-TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 0 1,212 0 12,000 12,000 0 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 6205-SUPPLIES 0 0 0 0 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 0 0 0 0 6311-INSURANCE-PROPERTY/LIABILITY 313,150 312,500 325,000 325,000 408,450 170,188 442,900 442,900 473,700 473,700 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES 313,150 312,500 325,000 325,000 408,450 170,188 442,900 442,900 473,700 473,700 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES 313,150 312,500 325,000 325,000 408,450 170,188 442,900 442,900 473,700 473,700 313,150 313,712 325,000 337,000 420,450 170,188 454,900 454,900 485,700 485,700 247 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 47: INSURANCE-1950 COMPANY 1000: GENERAL FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND 6143 Unemployment Compensation 12,000 12,000 5,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 Total 12,000 12,000 5,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES Total - - - - - - - 6311 INSURANCE Automobile 56,000 63,000 63,000 58,300 58,300 62,400 62,400 Property 109,000 144,900 144,900 121,000 121,000 129,500 129,500 General Liability 104,000 124,950 124,950 168,000 168,000 179,800 179,800 Boiler and Machinery 16,000 17,850 17,850 18,400 18,400 19,700 19,700 Umbrella 49,000 56,700 56,700 76,000 76,000 81,000 81,000 Employee Bonds 1,000 1,050 1,050 1,200 1,200 1,300 1,300 Reduction to Trend (10,000) - - - - Total 325,000 408,450 408,450 442,900 442,900 473,700 473,700 Total Net of Personnel 325,000 408,450 408,450 442,900 442,900 473,700 473,700 TOTAL EXPENSES $ 337,000 $ 420,450 $ 413,450 $ 454,900 $ 454,900 $ 485,700 $ 485,700 248 ••• •••• ••••• ••• AppValley Notes: 249 COMPANY DEPARTMENT BUSINESS UNIT ACTIVITY 1000 48 1960 Contingency & Transfers DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY The Council Contingency business unit provides the City Council with the financial ability to address unbudgeted items that come up after the levy is adopted. Fuel costs have the potential to become volatile and could exceed individual department budgets. This business unit includes a position vacancy factor for likely vacant positions that occur throughout the year but cannot be accurately assigned to individual operating budgets. A significant share of the annual street maintenance program comes from the property tax levy achieved with a transfer from the general fund to the Road Improvement Fund. This business unit contains a transfer to the Municipal Building Fund to fund a portion of the building improvement requests each budget year. New for the 2023 budget year is the establishment of separate building funds, one for Fire Facilities, another for Park Facilities and the existing Municipal Building Fund will remain for the Municipal Center. The funding for each of the these fund will come from transfers from the General Fund and/or the Future Capital Projects Fund IMPACT MEASURES / PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual Actual Adopted Adopted Projected Projected Item 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2023 Summary Budget Department 48 Contingency & Transfers 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Proposed Proposed Proposed Expenditures: Other Expenses 11,486 15,532 (8,299) 156,090 126,212 82,670 150,530 Capital Outlay 19,780 - - - - - - OtherTransfers(CARES) - 1,047,412 - - - - - Transfers to FCPF 350,000 2,900,000 1,150,000 - - - - Transfer to Fire Facilities Fund - - - - - 30,000 40,000 Transfer to Park Facilities Bldg Fu - - - - - 286,000 355,000 Transfer to Muni Bldg Fund 214,000 192,000 207,000 198,000 204,000 65,000 150,000 Transfers to Road Improv Fund 3,437,000 3,540,000 3,664,000 3,664,000 3,801,000 3,971,000 4,360,000 Total 4,032,266 7,694,944 5,012,701 4,018,090 4,131,212 4,434,670 5,055,530 2023 CAPITAL OUTLAY: None 2024 CAPITAL OUTLAY: None City of Apple Valley 250 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) CONTINGENCY&TRANSFERS 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6110-SALARY-REGULAR EMPLOYEES -7,709 0 6105-SALARIES AND WAGES 0 0 -7,709 0 6138-MEDICARE 0 0 -112 0 6139-FICA 0 0 -478 0 6125-EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 0 0 -590 0 6100-TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 0 0 -8,299 0 6205-SUPPLIES 0 0 0 0 6235-CONSULTANT SERVICES 11,486 15,532 0 0 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 11,486 15,532 0 0 6260-REPAIRS AND MAINTENA 0 0 0 0 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 11,486 15,532 0 0 6399-OTHER CHARGES 0 0 0 156,090 126,212 0 81,335 82,670 81,335 150,530 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 156,090 126,212 0 81,335 82,670 81,335 150,530 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 156,090 126,212 0 81,335 82,670 81,335 150,530 7110-TRANSFER TO OTHER FUNDS 4,020,780 7,679,412 5,021,000 3,862,000 4,005,000 0 4,452,000 4,352,000 5,115,000 4,905,000 7101-TOTAL TRANSFERS 4,020,780 7,679,412 5,021,000 3,862,000 4,005,000 0 4,452,000 4,352,000 5,115,000 4,905,000 7100-TOTAL TRANSFERS 4,020,780 7,679,412 5,021,000 3,862,000 4,005,000 0 4,452,000 4,352,000 5,115,000 4,905,000 4,032,266 7,694,944 5,012,701 4,018,090 4,131,212 0 4,533,335 4,434,670 5,196,335 5,055,530 251 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 48: CONTINGENCY&TRANSFERS-1960 COMPANY 1000: GENERAL FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED# PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND 6399 OTHER CHARGES General Contingency 218,090 188,212 143,335 144,670 143,335 212,530 $.25 Per Gallon for Fuel 20,000 20,000 50,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 Particip Factor for Annual Leave Sellback (35,000) (35,000) (35,000) (35,000) (35,000) (35,000) Position Vacancy Factor (47,000) (47,000) (47,000) (47,000) (47,000) (47,000) Total 156,090 126,212 50,000 81,335 82,670 81,335 150,530 7110 Transfers Out Transfer to Road lmprovment Fund 3,664,000 3,801,000 3,801,000 4,071,000 3,971,000 4,360,000 4,360,000 Transfer to Muni Bldg Fund-# 198,000 75,000 75,000 65,000 65,000 150,000 150,000 Transfer to Fire Facilities Fund-# 50,000 50,000 30,000 30,000 50,000 40,000 Transfer to Park Facilities Fund-# 79,000 79,000 286,000 286,000 555,000 355,000 Transfer to Muni Bldg Funds 198,000 204,000 204,000 381,000 381,000 755,000 545,000 3,862,000 4,005,000 4,005,000 4,452,000 4,352,000 5,115,000 4,905,000 Total Net of Personnel 4,018,090 4,131,212 4,055,000 4,533,335 4,434,670 5,196,335 5,055,530 TOTAL EXPENSES $ 4,018,090 $ 4,131,212 $ 4,055,000 $ 4,533,335 $ 4,434,670 $ 5,196,335 $ 5,055,530 Note#-the 2022 Budget amounts have been restated to split the 2022 adopted budget into the two new funds;Fire Facilities and Park Facilities Fund 252 ••• •••• ••••• ••• AppValley Notes: 253 COMPANY DEPARTMENT BUSINESS UNIT ACTIVITY 2200 110,111,112- Valleywood 2200's Golf Operations/Maintenance Golf Course DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY While utilizing the City Council adopted 2022-2031 Strategic Business Plan to guide the operations of the course, Valleywood offers a wide variety of golf opportunities to the public. We offer a high quality golf experience at a competitive rate while providing opportunities to residents of Apple Valley at a discounted price. We work to maximize revenue during the peak demand times and provide value golf during off peak times. In addition to golf activities, banquets, and events, the course plays host to the Apple Valley and Eastview High School boy's and girl's golf teams, District 196 Nordic Ski Team, cross country running races and a variety of other Recreation Department programs. Staff provide for the maintenance and beautification of the 190-acre Valleywood Golf Course property as well as the clubhouse and surrounding grounds. Golf course staff maintain the playability and health of the golf course through daily greens mowing, bi-weekly fairway and rough mowing and the ongoing upkeep and maintenance of the irrigation system and all equipment needs for the golf course. The overall success of the golf operation as a business is extremely dependent on the golf course conditions. While the management team can do things through marketing and promotion to attract players, it is mostly the overall course conditions and playability that will bring customers back and turn them into loyal Valleywood patrons. MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2023 & 2024 With the adoption of the 2022—2031 Strategic Business Plan, the course is positioned to continue providing Apple Valley and surrounding communities an exceptional recreation experience for years to come. The business plan provides for a number of much needed improvements which include: • Operating goal that revenues should exceed operating expenses annually by 10% • Replacement of the irrigation system and make on course improvements in 2023 which should position the course for continued success and improved playing conditions • Expansion of Wednesday Men's league to accommodate additional players • Establishment of a Vehicle Equipment Replacement Fund (VERF) allowing for planned replacement of the golf course maintenance equipment with a dedicated funding source • Continue to evaluate our equipment plan to reflect modern standards of maintenance and work to control equipment repair costs through proper maintenance and timely replacement. • Institute newer turf grass management methods and current standards and best practices for chemical and fertilizer applications. • Plan for cart path replacement and construction 254 Regular Status Personnel Schedule -FTE's Actual Actual Actual Adopted Proposed Proposed Position Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Golf Course Manager 1 1 1 1 1 1 Division Specialist 1 1 1 1 1 1 Maintenance Foreman 2 1 1 1 1 1 Maintenance Worker 1 1 1 1 1 Total 4 4 4 4 4 4 Temporary Status Personnel Schedule - (Part-Time hours) Actual Actual Actual Adopted Proposed Proposed Position Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Golf Course Maintenance: Seasonal Maintenance I 9,375 9,810 7,760 6,000 6,000 6,000 Seasonal Maintenance II 750 754 753 2,500 1,000 1,000 10,125 10,564 8,513 8,500 7,000 7,000 Golf Operations: Golf Supervisors & Leads 965 1,500 867 1,000 1,200 1,200 Golf Attendants (Pro Shop) 5,199 4,000 3,152 4,000 4,000 4,000 Golf Attendants (Outside) 3,515 3,500 4,197 3,500 3,500 3,500 Golf Clubhouse Maintenance 763 2,000 2,835 2,000 2,000 2,000 Golf Clerical Assistant 1,030 1,000 1,212 1,000 1,000 1,000 11,472 12,000 12,263 11,500 11,500 11,500 Food& Beverage : F & B Lead - - 988 400 900 900 F & B Attendants - -- 3,454 1,800 3,500 3,500 Building staff 762 750 762 750 4,442 2,200 4,400 4,400 Total Part Time 20,918 19,000 25,217 22,200 23,100 23,100 255 Combined Golf Operations (Golf and Food & Beverage) Summary Budget Department-110,111,112 VALLEYWOOD GOLF(Total Operations) 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Revenue: Green Fees $ 461,645 $ 710,208 $ 815,313 $ 594,000 $ 639,800 $ 750,000 $ 770,000 Cart Rentals 160,541 211,772 273,023 206,000 201,060 230,000 240,000 Golf League Dues 16,989 16,228 48,109 22,000 22,220 25,000 27,000 Season Pass Fees 84,016 30,852 33,407 38,000 70,000 30,000 32,000 Practice Range Fees 49,927 69,433 87,016 65,000 48,875 70,000 72,000 Golf Lessons 5,620 270 7,110 8,000 8,000 5,000 7,000 Pro Shop Merchandise Sales 76,211 73,734 100,781 109,000 78,000 70,000 72,000 Golf Operating Revenue 854,949 1,112,497 1,364,759 1,042,000 1,067,955 1,180,000 1,220,000 Food&Beverage Revenue 43,178 23,543 213,920 43,000 150,000 170,000 170,000 Total Revenue-Golf 898,127 1,136,040 1,578,679 1,085,000 1,217,955 1,350,000 1,390,000 Expenditures: Salaries&Wages 542,173 510,470 650,770 575,370 578,805 648,860 672,060 Employee Benefits 135,376 122,090 141,596 147,505 116,920 136,080 143,780 Supplies 99,848 94,719 127,144 121,200 118,000 123,850 121,000 Contractual Services 64,344 53,734 70,582 60,500 65,000 69,000 83,000 Utilities 37,688 41,524 56,689 50,000 43,000 43,000 43,000 Repairs&Maintenance 21,041 15,591 27,681 15,500 19,500 25,500 25,500 Training/Travel/Dues 7,696 7,795 10,512 9,200 7,000 10,265 8,600 Insurance&Other Expenses 53,417 50,029 56,849 41,000 39,500 45,000 45,600 Items for Resale 73,564 74,345 159,598 59,000 58,800 120,300 124,800 VERF Charges - - - - 150,000 150,000 150,000 Capital Outlay 1,500 1,496 5,717 90,000 - - - Total Operating Expense 1,036,647 971,793 1,307,138 1,169,275 1,196,525 1,371,855 1,417,340 Operating Income(loss)Before Depreciation&Transfers (138,520) 164,247 271,541 (84,275) 21,430 (21,855) (27,340) Depreciation: (211,793) (213,566) (188,964) (179,000) - - - Debt Service Interest (23,943) (24,635) (12,223) (22,925) - - - Net Other Income/Expense 547 1,568 555 (1,000) - - - Transfers In - - - - 150,000 150,000 150,000 Gain on Sale of Assets 4,000 - - - - -Net Income(Loss) (369,709) (72,386) 70,909 (287,200) 171,430 128,145 122,660 256 Golf Operations IMPACT MEASURES / PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual Actual Actual Proposed Proposed Proposed 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total number of rounds played 28,841 32,910 38,959 30,000 30,000 30,000 Total Revenue per Round $35.59 $34.00 $41.13 $40.60 $42.08 $43.66 Patron Card Members 67 63 21 41 50 50 Senior Patron Card Members 293 324 184 284 275 275 Seasonal Clubhouse Staff/round 2.35 2.70 3.35 2.60 2.60 2.60 Seasonal Maintenance staff hours 46.4 41.43 44.69 44.74 36.84 36.84 per acre Effective Weather Days 142 162 185 155 155 155 Gallons of irrigation water pumped 9.2 15.0 16.6 15 15 10 (in millions) Total Precipitation 43.17 29.83 25.00 30 30 30 Summary Budget Department-110/111 VALLEYWOOD GOLF(Excluding Food&Beverage) 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Revenue: Green Fees $ 461,645 $ 710,208 $ 815,313 $ 594,000 $ 639,800 $ 750,000 $ 770,000 Cart Rentals 160,541 211,772 273,023 206,000 201,060 230,000 240,000 Golf League Dues 16,989 16,228 48,109 22,000 22,220 25,000 27,000 Season Pass Fees 84,016 30,852 33,407 38,000 70,000 30,000 32,000 Practice Range Fees 49,927 69,433 87,016 65,000 48,875 70,000 72,000 Golf Lessons 5,620 270 7,110 8,000 8,000 5,000 7,000 Pro Shop Merchandise Sales 76,211 73,734 100,781 109,000 78,000 70,000 72,000 Golf Operating Revenue 854,949 1,112,497 1,364,759 1,042,000 1,067,955 1,180,000 1,220,000 Expenditures: Salaries&Wages 542,173 510,470 585,142 575,370 578,805 596,690 618,325 Employee Benefits 135,376 122,090 135,586 147,505 116,920 131,135 138,635 Supplies 99,026 93,819 123,826 121,200 118,000 119,000 116,500 Contractual Services 57,645 52,279 65,654 60,500 65,000 65,000 65,000 Utilities 37,688 41,524 56,689 50,000 43,000 43,000 43,000 Repairs&Maintenance 12,865 14,906 20,581 15,500 19,500 19,500 19,500 Training/Travel/Dues 7,605 7,795 9,277 9,200 7,000 8,700 7,000 Insurance&Other Expenses 53,417 50,029 56,770 41,000 39,500 39,500 39,500 Items for Resale 70,850 73,088 74,396 59,000 58,800 58,800 58,800 VERF Charges - - - - 150,000 150,000 150,000 Capital Outlay 1,500 1,496 - 90,000 - - - Total Operating Expense 1,018,145 967,496 1,127,921 1,169,275 1,196,525 1,231,325 1,256,260 Operating Income(loss)Before Depreciation&Transfers (163,196) 145,001 236,838 (127,275) (128,570) (51,325) (36,260) Depreciation: (211,793) (213,566) (188,964) (179,000) - - - Debt Service Interest (23,943) (24,635) (12,223) (22,925) - -Net Other Income/Expense 547 1,568 555 (1,000) - - - Transfers In - - - - 150,000 150,000 150,000 Gain on Sale of Assets 4,000 - - - - - - NetIncome(Loss) (394,385) (91,632) 36,206 (330,200) 21,430 98,675 113,740 257 Valleywood Capital Outlay and VERF Capital Outlay 2023 2024 Irrigation/On-Course Contractor (Funded by VW Improvement Fund) 2,095,778 Patio Furniture 40,000 Driving Range Mats 40,000 Cart Paths 50,000 AV Equipment 40,000 Total Capital Outlay 2,135,778 130,000 Vehicle Equipment Replacement Fund (VERF) 2023 2024 Lease Payments Unit 533 Toro Groundsmaster 4700D 18,029 Unit 539 Toro Reelmaster 3150Q 9,356 Unit 538 Cushman Range Picker 2,245 2,245 EZ-Go Golf Carts (55) 29,370 84,370 59,000 86,615 Purchases Unit 506 Toro Reelmaster 3150Q 30,500 Unit 535 Ryan Aerifier 36,800 Unit 581 Toro ProBlow 9,500 Unit 514 John Deere Tractor 52,800 76,800 52,800 Total VERF 135,800 139,415 258 City of Apple Valley Department Expense Summary Budget Years(2023-2024) GOLF(Excluding Food&Beverage) 2021 Coundl 2022 Council Object Account 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual OOdginnaall Adopted Original JYTD Adual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6110-SALARY-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 263,586 259,042 290,322 289,145 277,955 136,688 309,505 309,505 324,555 324,555 6111-SALARY PART-TIME - - - - 17,320 17,820 17,820 18,355 18,355 6112-SALARY-SEASONAL TEMP 264,087 265,758 278,198 271,225 259,255 89,790 248,150 248,150 255,595 255,595 6113-OVERTIME-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 8,824 11,814 19,397 15,000 15,000 5,814 9,000 9,000 9,100 9,100 6118-VACATION PAY 6,537 (18,077) 6,134 - - - - - 6121-INSURANCE CASH BENEFIT 360 1,020 1,440 - - 1,320 - - 6122-COMP REQUEST (3,801) (10,199) (10,349) - - (4,619) - - 6123-SALARY-OTHER - - - - 9,275 - 12,215 12,215 10,720 10,720 6124-OVERTIME-SEASONAL TEMP 2,580 1,111 - - - 248 6105-SALARIES AND WAGES 542,173 510,470 585,142 575,370 578,805 229,241 596,690 596,690 618,325 618,325 6138-MEDICARE 7,571 7,494 8,241 8,345 8,075 3,252 8,650 8,650 8,965 8,965 6139-FICA 32,374 31,935 35,238 35,675 34,515 13,903 36,995 36,995 38,335 38,335 6141-PENSIONS-PERA 31,263 25,980 27,606 30,390 22,310 13,260 25,915 25,915 26,980 26,980 6142-WORKERS COMPENSATION 7,311 6,549 7,768 7,770 6,775 3,214 10,900 10,900 11,860 11,860 6144-LONG-TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE 531 529 475 835 770 200 885 885 925 925 6145-MEDICAL INSURANCE 64,483 62,029 70,842 64,490 58,475 24,995 62,090 62,090 65,870 65,870 6146-DENTAL INSURANCE 3,199 3,826 4,333 - - 1,980 - - - - 6147-LIFE INSURANCE-BASIC 21 22 26 - - 37 - - - - 6148-LIFE INSURANCE-SUPP/DEPEND 67 209 307 - - 140 - - - - 6170-EMPLOYEE PAID PREMIUMS (11,446) (16,482) (19,250) - (14,000) - (14,300) (14,300) (14,300) (14,300) 6125-EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 135,376 122,090 135,586 147,505 116,920 60,981 131,135 131,135 138,635 138,635 6100-TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 677,548 632,560 720,728 722,875 695,725 290,222 727,825 727,825 756,960 756,960 6210-OFFICE SUPPLIES 463 114 280 1,200 1,000 233 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6211-SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT 2,846 7,659 3,834 6,000 6,000 1,520 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6212-MOTOR FUELS/OILS 12,686 9,139 12,524 13,000 13,500 3,925 13,500 13,500 13,500 13,500 6213-FERTILIZER 9,307 7,011 11,073 18,000 16,000 3,641 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 6214-CHEMICALS 34,247 32,260 39,471 22,000 30,000 41,401 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 6215-EQUIPMENT-PARTS 7,338 16,924 24,088 25,000 23,000 5,240 24,000 24,000 23,000 23,000 6216-VEHICLES-TIRES/BATTERIES 440 516 223 1,000 500 521 500 500 500 500 6229-GENERAL SUPPLIES 31,699 20,197 32,333 35,000 28,000 15,646 28,000 28,000 26,500 26,500 6205-SUPPLIES 99,026 93,819 123,826 121,200 118,000 72,127 119,000 119,000 116,500 116,500 6231-LEGAL SERVICES - - 3,274 - - 917 - - - - 6235-CONSULTANT SERVICES 184 66 62 - - 41 - - - - 6237-TELEPHONE/PAGERS 14,251 6,353 5,523 15,000 15,000 2,503 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 6239-PRINTING 7,919 5,583 5,979 7,500 7,000 4,779 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 6240-CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE 8,038 8,650 10,644 8,000 15,000 4,678 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 6249-OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 27,253 30,627 40,171 30,000 28,000 15,510 28,000 28,000 28,000 28,000 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 57,645 51,279 65,654 60,500 65,000 28,428 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 6255-UTILITIES-ELECTRIC 29,659 30,552 35,969 35,000 30,000 8,108 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 6256-UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS 6,810 6,202 12,997 10,000 8,000 10,305 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 6257-UTILITIES-PROPANE/WATER/SEWER 1,218 4,770 7,724 5,000 5,000 (46) 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 6250-UTILITIES 37,688 41,524 56,689 50,000 43,000 18,367 43,000 43,000 43,000 43,000 6265-REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 6,941 12,040 13,012 10,000 14,000 23,622 14,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 6266-REPAIRS-BUILDING 5,924 2,866 6,819 5,000 5,000 11,372 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 6269-REPAIRS-OTHER - - 750 500 500 - 500 500 500 500 6260-REPAIRS AND MAINTENA 12,865 14,906 20,581 15,500 19,500 34,994 19,500 19,500 19,500 19,500 6275-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL 724 465 411 1,000 1,000 227 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6276-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP OTHER 1,481 - - 1,500 - - 1,500 1,500 - - 6277-MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE 745 695 784 1,000 1,000 226 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6278-SUBSISTENCE ALLOWANCE 200 - - 200 - - 200 200 - - 6280-DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 3,301 4,186 4,464 3,000 3,000 1,217 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 6281-UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 1,154 2,448 3,618 2,500 2,000 1,678 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 6270-TRNG/TRAVLIDUES/UNIF 7,605 7,795 9,277 9,200 7,000 3,348 8,700 8,700 7,000 7,000 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 214,829 209,323 276,027 256,400 252,500 157,264 255,200 255,200 251,000 251,000 6310-RENTAL EXPENSE 1,716 5,584 3,988 4,000 2,500 3,527 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 6311-INSURANCE-PROPERTY/LIABILITY 36,000 18,700 19,000 19,000 19,000 7,917 19,000 19,000 19,000 19,000 6333-GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS (43) (34) (3) - - (108) - - - - 6349-LATE FEES/FINANCE CHARGES - 0 2 - - - - - - - 6351-VISA/BANK CHARGES 15,533 25,566 33,294 17,000 17,000 4,457 17,000 17,000 17,000 17,000 6399-OTHER CHARGES 210 213 489 1,000 1,000 - 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES 53,417 50,029 56,770 41,000 39,500 15,793 39,500 39,500 39,500 39,500 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES 53,417 50,029 56,770 41,000 39,500 15,793 39,500 39,500 39,500 39,500 259 City of Apple Valley Department Expense Summary Budget Years(2023-2024) GOLF(Excluding Food&Beverage) 2021 Council 2022 Council Object Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Original Adopted Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budge[ 6410-GOLF-RENT POWER CARTS 1,665 8,200 8,411 3,000 3,000 - 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 6411-GOLF-BAGS&UMBRELLAS 2,190 4,215 1,124 2,000 2,000 4,719 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 6412-GOLF-BALLS 11,891 12,855 8,179 9,000 12,000 9,580 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 6413-GOLF-CAPS/HATS/CLOTHING 16,434 14,977 13,734 12,000 14,000 10,916 14,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 6414-GOLF-CLUBS 3,715 3,370 4,200 8,000 4,000 1,746 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 6415-GOLF-GLOVES 1,635 5,324 6,260 5,000 3,000 6,098 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 6416-GOLF-SHOES 6,539 2,968 5,792 2,000 3,000 5,562 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 6417-GOLF-CIGARS 926 783 1,405 1,500 1,500 - 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 6418-GOLF-PRO SHOP OTHER 8,853 4,424 8,027 5,000 5,000 4,322 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 6420-GOLF-FOOD 6,705 2,012 - - - - 6421-GOLF-NON ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES 1,751 4,156 - - - - 6423-GOLF-CASH DISCOUNT (466) (279) (629) - (500) (814) (500) (500) (500) (500) 6424-GOLF FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE 2,668 2,733 2,951 2,500 2,800 2,101 2,800 2,800 2,800 2,800 6426-HANDICAP FEE 1,710 7,350 9,350 2,000 2,000 11,714 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 6427-GOLF-RENTAL EQUIPMENT - - - 1,000 1,000 - 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6428-GOLF LESSONS 4,632 - 5,592 6,000 6,000 - 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6401-EXPENDITURES 70,850 73,088 74,396 59,000 58,800 55,944 58,800 58,800 58,800 58,800 6400-TOTAL EXPENDITURES 70,850 73,088 74,396 59,000 58,800 55,944 58,800 58,800 58,800 58,800 6610-DEPRECIATION 211,684 212,285 187,682 179,000 - - - - 6601-TOTAL DEPRECIATION 211,684 212,285 187,682 179,000 - - - - - - 6600-TOTAL DEPRECIATION 211,684 212,285 187,682 179,000 - - - - - - 6730-CAPITAL OUTLAY-TRANSPORTATION 1,500 - - 65,000 - - - - 6740-CAPITAL OUTLAY-MACH/EQ/OTHER - 1,496 - 25,000 - - 6745-VERF CHARGES 150,000 62,500 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 6701-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,500 1,496 - 90,000 150,000 62,500 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 6700-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,500 1,496 - 90,000 150,000 62,500 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 6910-BOND PRINCIPAL 63,705 - - - 6915-DEBT SERVICE-OTHER 117,100 - - - 6901-TOTAL DEBT SERVICE - - - 180,805 - - - - - - 6900-TOTAL DEBT SERVICE - - - 180,805 - - - - - - 7015-DEBT SERVICE-INTEREST 14,169 15,684 12,223 14,850 - - - - 7016-INTERFUND LOAN-INTEREST 9,774 8,951 - 8,075 - - - - 7001-TOTAL INTEREST AND FISCAL FEES 23,943 24,635 12,223 22,925 - - - - - - 7000-TOTAL INTEREST AND FISCAL FEES 23,943 24,635 12,223 22,925 - - - - - - 1,253,772 1,203,416 1,327,826 1,552,005 1,196,525 581,723 1,231,325 1,231,325 1,256,260 1,256,260 260 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2022 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 61: GOLF-2205 (GOLF OPERATIONS-Excluding Food&Bev) 2205>2260) COMPANY 2200: GOLF FUND JDE 2020 2021 2022 2023 2023 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL COUNCIL DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADOPTED ADOPTED ADOPTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP REVENUE Golf Recap: Green Fees 609,000 612,000 639,800 658,200 750,000 770,000 Cart Rentals 186,000 206,000 201,060 204,120 230,000 240,000 League Dues 50,000 50,000 22,220 22,440 25,000 27,000 Season Pass 80,000 80,000 70,000 70,700 30,000 32,000 Range 65,000 75,000 48,875 50,350 70,000 72,000 Lessons 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 5,000 7,000 Merchandise Sales 126,000 123,000 78,000 78,000 70,000 72,000 Food and Beverage Sales Total Golf Operations 1,124,000 1,154,000 1,067,955 1,091,810 1,180,000 1,220,000 Annual Transfer - - 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 TOTAL GOLF REVENUE 1,124,000 1,154,000 1,217,955 1,241,810 1,330,000 1,370,000 SALARIES 6110 Regular Employees 264,295 278,540 277,955 309,505 309,505 324,555 6111 Salary-Part Time 17,320 17,820 17,820 18,355 6112 Salary-Seasonal Temp 263,660 271,225 259,255 248,150 248,150 255,595 6113 Overtime-Reg 15,000 15,000 15,000 9,000 9,000 9,100 6123 Salaries-Other 12,020 10,605 9,275 12,215 12,215 10,720 6138 Medicare 8,050 8,345 8,075 8,650 8,650 8,965 6139 FICA 34,410 35,675 34,515 36,995 36,995 38,335 6141 Pension-PERA 28,375 30,390 22,310 25,915 25,915 26,980 6142 Workers Compensation 14,235 7,770 6,775 10,900 10,900 11,860 6144 Long-term Disability Insurance 800 835 770 885 885 925 6145 Hospital&Life Insurance 64,990 64,490 58,475 62,090 62,090 65,870 6170 Employee Paid Premiums (14,000) (14,300) (14,300) (14,300) Total 705,835 722,875 695,725 727,825 727,825 756,960 6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1,500 1,200 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Total 1,500 1,200 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6211 SMALL TOOL&EQUIPMENT Miscellaneous 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 Total 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6212 MOTOR FUELS/OILS 10,000 13,000 13,500 13,500 13,500 13,500 Total 10,000 13,000 13,500 13,500 13,500 13,500 6213 FERTILIZER 15,000 18,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 Total 15,000 18,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 6214 CHEMICALS 25,000 22,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 Total 25,000 22,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS Mowers,lrrigation,Tractors 30,000 25,000 23,000 24,000 24,000 23,000 Total 30,000 25,000 23,000 24,000 24,000 23,000 6216 EQUIPMENT-TIRES/BATTERIES 1,000 1,000 500 500 500 500 Total 1,000 1,000 500 500 500 500 6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES Operations/Misc 45,000 35,000 28,000 28,000 28,000 26,500 Total 45,000 35,000 28,000 28,000 28,000 26,500 6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS Clubhouse,Maintenance 5,000 _ 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Total 5,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 6239 PRINTING/PUBLISHING Promotion Flyers 7,000 7,500 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 Total 7,000 7,500 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 6240 C.SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVAL Clubhouse, Maintenance 8,000 8,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Total 8,000 8,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES Mechanical contract 20,000 25,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 Culligan Water Coolers-mntc shop 2,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Total 22,000 30,000 28,000 28,000 28,000 28,000 261 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2022 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 61: GOLF-2205 (GOLF OPERATIONS-Excluding Food&Bev) 2205>2260) COMPANY 2200: GOLF FUND JDE 2020 2021 2022 2023 2023 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL COUNCIL DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADOPTED ADOPTED ADOPTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP 6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC 40,000 35,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 Total 40,000 35,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS 10,000 10,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 Total 10,000 10,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 6257 UTILITIES-PROPANE/WATER/SEWER 4,500 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Total 4,500 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT Misc Equip Repairs 4,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Winterize Sprinkler System 5,000 5,000 5,500 5,000 5,000 5,000 Rebuild Various Equip 10,000 5,000 4,500 4,000 4,000 4,000 Total 15,000 10,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 6266 REPAIRS-BUILDINGS 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Total 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 6269 REPAIRS-OTHER 500 500 500 500 500 500 Total 500 500 500 500 500 500 6275 SCHOOL/CONF/EXP-LOCAL Maintenance Certification 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Total 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6276 SCHOOL/CONF/EXP-OTHER National Conference - 1,500 - 1,500 1,500 Total - 1,500 - 1,500 1,500 - 6277 MILEAGE ALLOWANCE 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Total 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6278 SUBSISTENCE 250 200 - 200 200 Total 250 200 - 200 200 - 6280 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS MGA/PGA 2,500 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 Total 2,500 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 2,500 2,500 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Total 2,500 2,500 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 6310 RENTAL EXPENSE Chemical Toilets 3,000 3,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Small Equipment 1,000 1,000 500 500 500 500 Total 4,000 4,000 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 6311 INSURANCE 18,700 19,000 19,000 19,000 19,000 19,000 Total 18,700 19,000 19,000 19,000 19,000 19,000 6399 OTHER CHARGES Building Reservation Software 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 _1,000 1,000 Total 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6610 DEPRECIATION Equipment 37,500 37,500 Carts 45,000 45,000 Building&Sewer Extension 96,500 96,500 Total 179,000 179,000 - - - - 6910 INTERFUND LOAN PRINCIPAL - Sewer Extension 12,920 12,920 Club House 43,350 43,540 Parking Lot 7,215 7,245 Total 63,485 63,705 - - - - 7016 INTERFUND LOAN INTEREST Sewer Extension 1,945 1,290 Club House 6,650 6,460 Parking Lot 355 325 Total 8,950 8,075 - - - - 6915 PRINCIPAL PORTION OF CAPITAL LEASE Cart Lease'17 41,850 Cart Lease'17 Payoff 1 55,000 262 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2022 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 61: GOLF-2205 (GOLF OPERATIONS-Excluding Food&Bev) 2205>2260) COMPANY 2200: GOLF FUND JDE 2020 2021 2022 2023 2023 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL COUNCIL DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADOPTED ADOPTED ADOPTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP Cart Lease'21 43,000 Mower Lease'18(TCF) 34,183 35,915 Mower Lease'19(TCF) 23,220 Turfwerks Lease '18(VGM) - 14,965 131,033 117,100 - - - - 7015 INTEREST ON CAPITAL LEASE Cart Lease'21 5,500 Mower Lease'18(TCF'22 final pmt) 3,730 Mower Lease'19(TCF'23 final pmt) 4,165 Turfwerks Lease '18(VGM-'22 final pmt) 1,455 Total 8,150 14,850 - - - - 6730 CAPITAL OUTLAY-VEHICLES Aerway Aerator 15,000 17,000 Greens Roller 15,000 18,000 Aerator 25,000 30,000 Total 75,000 65,000 - - - - 6740 CAPITAL OUTLAY-OTHER ITEMS Range equipment 10,000 25,000 Total 10,000 25,000 - - - - 6745 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT-VERF 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 Total - - 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 6351 VISABANK CHARGES 20,000 17,000 17,000 17,000 17,000 17,000 Total 20,000 17,000 17,000 17,000 17,000 17,000 6410 POWER CARTS RENTAL 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 6411 GOLF-BAGS&UMBRELLAS 1,500 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 6412 BALLS 10,000 9,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 6413 CAPS/HATS/CLOTHING 12,000 12,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 6414 CLUBS 8,000 8,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 6415 GLOVES 6,000 5,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 6416 SHOES 4,000 2,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 6417 CIGARS 2,000 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 6418 PRO SHOP-OTHER 7,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 6423 CASH DISCOUNT (1,000) - (500) (500) (500) (500) 6424 FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE 2,500 2,500 2,800 2,800 2,800 2,800 6426 HANDICAP FEE 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 6427 GOLF-RENTAL EQUIPMENT - 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6428 GOLF LESSONS - 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 Total 97,000 59,000 58,800 58,800 58,800 58,800 Total Net of Personnel 874,268 829,130 500,800 503,500 503,500 499,300 TOTAL EXPENSES $ 1,580,103 $ 1,552,005 $ 1,196,525 $ 1,231,325 $ 1,231,325 $ 1,256,260 263 2200 Valleywood Food & Beverage 2265 Food & Beverage Valleywood Food & Beverage Daily Food and Beverage operations at Valleywood; including clubhouse bar and grill, tournament menus, banquet and rental events and on course beverage cart operations. Although we had seen steady growth in the event and outing business over the last few years with the loss of virtually all of our group outings and banquet events due to COVID-19 this area of the operation could take several years to re-build. For the few events we have had over the last year and a half we have allowed the client to use any caterer with a valid catering license and with the caterer agreeing to pay a 10% fee to Valleywood. This has worked quite well and we have had 5 different caterers service Valleywood events. We are developing marketing programs targeting golf outing and event rentals to help boost this business as things return closer to normal for large gatherings and events. Valleywood Food & Beverage—Objectives for 2023 & 2024 • Operate the food & beverage operations using city staff • Provide banquet food service by contracted caterers allowing Valleywood staff to concentrate on golf and reduce staffing expenses related to servicing banquets/events • Work to rebuild outing and event business with a goal of hosting 25 private banquet functions in 2023 and 40 in 2024. • Develop better systems and consistency of cleaning of the public areas most likely through a contractual agreement with a cleaning company. Temporary Status Personnel Schedule — (Part-Time hours) Actual Actual Actual Adopted Proposed Proposed Position Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Food& Beverage : F & B Lead - - 988 400 900 900 F & B Attendants - -- 3,454 1,800 3,500 3,500 Building staff 762 750 Total F & B 762 750 4,442 2,200 4,400 4,400 264 IMPACT MEASURES / PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual Actual Actual Projected Projected Projected 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 F & B revenue per round $1.60 $0.72 $5.51 $4.50 $5.19 $5.19 F & B revenue per staff hour $50.56 $51.00 $52.00 $53.00 Golf Events 40-60 35 1 2 2 Golf Events 60-100 15 1 Golf Events 100+ 5 2 1 1 1 1 Private Banquets 32 2 5 20 25 30 Corporate Banquets/Meetings 64 7 28 55 59 59 Non-Profit Banquet 8 Club Events 12 2 3 3 Public Events 10 3 5 5 Summary Budget Department 61 Business Unit#2265 -FOOD&BEVERAGE OPERATIONS 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Revenue: Food&N/A Bev 9,396 6,853 55,725 - 48,000 55,000 57,000 Beer - - 85,675 - 59,250 53,500 57,000 Liquor/Wine - - 44,322 - 24,000 19,500 23,000 Banquet&Rentals 18,176 7,808 28,198 18,000 15,000 25,000 26,000 Commissions 15,606 8,882 - 25,000 3,750 7,000 7,000 Total Food&Beverage 43,178 23,543 213,920 43,000 150,000 160,000 170,000 Expenditures: Salaries&Wages - - 65,628 6,425 56,340 52,170 53,735 Emp.Benefits - - 6,010 575 5,845 4,945 5,145 Supplies 822 900 3,318 - 4,500 4,850 4,500 Contractual Serv. 6,699 1,455 4,928 10,000 4,000 4,000 18,000 Utilities - - - - 5,000 - - Repairs&Maint. 8,176 685 7,100 1,000 1,000 6,000 6,000 Training/Travel/Dues 91 - 1,235 - 500 1,565 1,600 Insurance&Other Exp. - - 79 - 7,800 5,500 6,100 Items for Resale 2,714 1,257 85,202 - 61,500 61,500 66,000 Capital Outlay - - 5,717 7,000 12,000 - - Total Expenditures 18,502 4,297 179,217 25,000 158,485 140,530 161,080 Operating Income(loss) 24,676 19,246 34,703 18,000 (8,485) 19,470 8,920 265 City of Apple Valley Department Expense Summary Budget Years(2023-2024) GOLF-FOOD&BEVERAGE ONLY 2021 Council 2022 Council Object Adopted June 2022 YTD 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Original Original Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6110-SALARY-REGULAR EMPLOYEES - - - - 16,605 - - - 6112-SALARY-SEASONAL TEMP - - 65,604 6,425 39,050 34,961 52,170 52,170 53,735 53,735 6123-SALARY-OTHER - - - - 685 - - - - - 6124-OVERTIME-SEASONAL TEMP - - 24 - - - - - 6105-SALARIES AND WAGES - - 65,628 6,425 56,340 34,961 52,170 52,170 53,735 53,735 6138-MEDICARE - - 952 90 780 539 755 755 780 780 6139-FICA - - 4,071 400 3.345 2,305 3,235 3,235 3,335 3,335 6141-PENSIONS-PERA - - 312 - 1,120 584 - - - - 6142-WORKERS COMPENSATION - - 675 85 600 457 955 955 1,030 1,030 6125-EMPLOYEE BENEFITS - - 6,010 575 5,845 3,885 4,945 4,945 5,145 5,145 6100-TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES - - 71,638 7,000 62,185 38,846 57,115 57,115 58,880 58,880 6210-OFFICE SUPPLIES - - - - - - 6211-SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT - - 769 - 1,000 - 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6212-MOTOR FUELS/OILS 500 - 600 600 500 500 6215-EQUIPMENT-PARTS 1,000 - 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6229-GENERAL SUPPLIES 822 900 2,549 - 2,000 334 2,250 2,250 2,000 2,000 6205-SUPPLIES 822 900 3,318 - 4,500 334 4,850 4,850 4,500 4,500 6239-PRINTING - - - - - - - - 4,000 4,000 6240-CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE 6,014 1,455 2,853 10,000 2,000 2,278 2,000 2,000 12,000 12,000 6249-OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 685 - 2.075 - 2,000 2,084 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6,699 1,455 4,928 10,000 4,000 4,362 4,000 4,000 18,000 18,000 6255-UTILITIES-ELECTRIC 5,000 - - - 6250-UTILITIES - - - - 5,000 - - - - - 6265-REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 4,776 685 5.988 1,000 1,000 976 6.000 6,000 6.000 6,000 6266-REPAIRS-BUILDING 3,400 - 1,111 - 540 - - - - 6260-REPAIRS AND MAINTENA 8,176 685 7,100 1,000 1,000 1,516 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6275-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL - - 450 480 - - - - 6277-MILEAGE ALLOWANCE - - - - - - 300 300 300 300 6280-DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS - - 785 - - 765 765 765 800 800 6281-UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE - - - 500 - 500 500 500 500 6270-TRNG/TRAVUDUES/UNIF - - 1,235 - 500 1,245 1,565 1,565 1,600 1,600 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 15,697 3,040 16,581 11,000 15,000 7,457 16,415 16,415 30,100 30,100 6310-RENTAL EXPENSE 91 - 79 - 500 317 500 500 500 500 6311-INSURANCE-PROPERTY/LIABILITY 7,300 5,000 5,000 5,600 5,600 6351-VISA/BANK CHARGES - 953 - - - - 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES 91 - 79 - 7,800 1,270 5,500 5,500 6,100 6,100 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES 91 - 79 - 7,800 1,270 5,500 5,500 6,100 6,100 6419-GOLF-BEER - - 27,423 - 30,000 14,445 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 6420-GOLF-FOOD 107 38 26,065 - 8,000 13,131 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 6421-GOLF-NON ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES 1,706 927 13,114 - 15,000 6,449 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 6422-GOLF-KITCHEN SUPPLIES 901 292 5,553 - 2,000 1,737 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 6424-GOLF FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE - - 3 - - - - - - 6429-GOLF-LIQUOR - - 11,158 - 5,000 5,582 5,000 5,000 6,000 6,000 6430-GOLF-WINE - - 1,885 - 1,500 314 1,500 1,500 5,000 5,000 6401-EXPENDITURES 2,714 1,257 85,202 - 61,500 41,658 61,500 61,500 66,000 66,000 6400-TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,714 1,257 85,202 - 61,500 41,658 61,500 61,500 66,000 66,000 6610-DEPRECIATION 109 1,281 1,281 - 6601-TOTAL DEPRECIATION 109 1,281 1,281 - - - - - - - 6600-TOTAL DEPRECIATION 109 1,281 1,281 - - - - - - - 6740-CAPITAL OUTLAY-MACH/EQ/OTHER 5,717 7,000 12,000 - - - 6701-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY - - 5,717 7,000 12,000 - - - - - 6700-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY - - 5,717 7,000 12,000 - - - - - 18,611 5,578 180,498 25,000 158,485 89,231 140,530 140,530 161,080 161,080 266 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 112: Food&Bev 2265,2270,2280 Kitchen,Food&Bev,Banquets COMPANY 2200: GOLF FUND JDE 2021 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND REVENUE: 4750 Roasted Pear-Concession 25,000 - - - - - 4736 Food 17,500 16,000 16,000 17,000 17,000 4737 Beer 45,000 41,000 41,000 42,000 42,000 4741 Liquor 15,000 12,000 12,000 14,000 14,000 4742 Rental/banquet fees 18,000 15,000 25,000 25,000 26,000 26,000 4743 Banquet-Beverages 19,000 26,000 26,000 27,000 27,000 4744 Banquet-Food(commissions) 3,750 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 4747 Golf-Beverages 6,500 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 4748 Banquet-Beer 10,000 10,000 10,000 11,000 11,000 4749 Banquet-Liquor/Wine 5,000 5,000 5,000 6,000 6,000 4760 Cart Food 500 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 4761 Cart Beer 4,250 2,500 2,500 4,000 4,000 4762 Cart Liquor 4,000 2,500 2,500 3,000 3,000 4763 Cart Beverages 4,500 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Total Revenues 43,000 I 150,000 160,000 160,000 170,000 170,000 SALARIES 6110 Regular Employees 16,605 - - - - 6112 Salary-Seasonal Temp 6,425 39,050 52,170 52,170 53,735 53,735 6110.1 Salaries-Other - 685 - - - 6138 Medicare 90 780 755 755 780 780 6139 FICA 400 3,345 3,235 3,235 3,335 3,335 6141 Pension-PERA - 1,120 - - - 6142 Workers Compensation 85 600 955 955 1,030 1,030 Total - 7,000 62,185 57,115 57,115 58,880 58,880 6211 SMALL TOOL&EQUIPMENT Misc 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Total - 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6212 MOTOR FUELS/OILS 500 600 600 500 500 1 Total - 500 600 600 500 500 6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS _ 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Total - 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES Cleaning Supplies,Chemicals,Gloves 2,000 2,250 2,250 2,000 2,000 Kitchen supplies _ Total - 2,000 2,250 2,250 2,000 2,000 6239 PRINTING/PUBLISHING Total - - - - 4,000 4,000 6240 C.SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVAL Garbage Service 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Linen Cleaning Service 10,000 10,000 10,000 Kitchen Uniform Laundry Service Total 10,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 12,000 12,000 6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Total - 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC ECOLAB Preventive Maint.Agmt. 5,000 Total - 5,000 - - - - 6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT ECOLAB Preventive Maint.Agmt. 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Kitchen Equip.Repairs 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Total 1,000 1,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6277 MILEAGE ALLOWANCE 300 300 300 300 Total - - 300 300 300 300 6280 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 765 765 800 800 Total - - 765 765 800 800 6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 500 500 500 500 500 267 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 112: Food&Bev 2265,2270,2280 Kitchen,Food&Bev,Banquets COMPANY 2200: GOLF FUND JDE 2021 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND Total - 500 500 500 500 500 6310 RENTAL EXPENSE 500 500 500 500 500 Total - 500 500 500 500 500 6311 INSURANCE Liquor Liab Insurance 7,300 5,000 5,000 5,600 5,600 Total - 7,300 5,000 5,000 5,600 5,600 6740 CAPITAL OUTLAY-MACH/EQ/OTHER Appliance Replacement 7,000 12,000 Total 7,000 12,000 - - - - ITEMS FOR RESALE 6419 BEER 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 6420 FOOD 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 6421 NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 6422 KITCHEN SUPPLIES 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 6429 LIQUOR 5,000 5,000 5,000 6,000 6,000 6430 WINE 1,500 1,500 1,500 5,000 5,000 6351 VISA COSTS Total - 61,500 61,500 61,500 66,000 I 66,000 Total Net of Personnel 18,000 96,300 83,415 83,415 102,200 102,200 1 1 TOTAL EXPENSES $ 25,000 $ 158,485 $ 140,530 $ 140,530 $ 161,080 $ 161,080 Net $ 18,000 $ (8,485) $ 19,470 $ 19,470 $ 8,920 $ 8,920 268 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT:GOLF REVENUES COMPANY:GOLF 2200 2019 2020 2021 2022 2021 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION Actual Actual Actual YTD June COUNCIL COUNCIL DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND GOLF REVENUE 4711&4715 9 Hole Fees 173,307 228,926 241,710 97,172 210,000 148,400 190,000 190,000 200,000 200,000 4710&4714 18 Hole Fees 288,338 481,282 573,603 196,762 380,000 487,400 556,000 556,000 566,000 566,000 4716 Golf League Dues 16,989 16,228 48,109 60,695 22,000 22,220 25,000 25,000 27,000 27,000 4718 Season Pass Fees 84,016 30,852 33,407 43,157 38,000 70,000 30,000 30,000 32,000 32,000 4725 Golf Add!Rounds - - - 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4721 Practice Range Fees 49,927 69,433 87,016 39,158 65,000 48,875 70,000 70,000 72,000 72,000 4717 Golf Lessons 5,620 270 7,110 7,570 8,000 8,000 5,000 5,000 7,000 7,000 4722 Power cart rental 160,541 211,525 273,023 101,195 200,000 195,000 224,000 224,000 234,000 234,000 4723 Pull cart rental - 247 - 6,000 6,060 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 Total 778,738 1,038,763 1,263,978 545,709 933,000 989,955 1,110,000 1,110,000 1,148,000 1,148,000 PRO SHOP REVENUE 4724 Golf club rental 1,653 852 1,993 933 3,000 3,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 4726 handicap fees 2,705 9,007 10,583 6,032 3,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 7,000 7,000 4728 Clubs 4,633 2,928 5,970 1,930 4,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 4729 Balls 17,041 16,500 18,020 8,390 22,000 19,000 18,000 18,000 19,000 19,000 4730 Bags&Umbrellas 3,208 4,340 4,567 4,014 4,000 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 4731 Shoes 6,671 3,949 7,111 2,009 8,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4732 Gloves 7,406 8,733 12,189 4,896 10,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4733 Accessories 12,198 10,592 15,858 6,014 20,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 4734 Caps&Hats 5,451 3,814 9,972 3,207 8,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 4735 Clothing 15,630 13,128 14,942 7,536 24,000 16,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 4738 Gift Certificates Purchased - - 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 4739 Gift Certificates Redeemed - - (22,000) (22,000) (25,000) (25,000) (25,000) (25,000) 4740 Over(Under) (386) (109) (424) (369) - - - - Total 76,211 73,734 100,781 44,592 109,000 78,000 70,000 70,000 72,000 72,000 FOOD&BEVERAGE REVENUE 4750 Roasted Pear-Concession 15,606 8,882 - - 25,000 - - - 4736 Food 7,450 6,853 30,284 14,830 - 17,500 16,000 16,000 17,000 17,000 4737 Beer - - 85,675 39,827 - 45,000 41,000 41,000 42,000 42,000 4741 Liquor - - 44,322 20,522 - 15,000 12,000 12,000 14,000 14,000 4742 Rental/banquet fees 18,176 7,808 28,198 (1,821) 18,000 15,000 25,000 25,000 26,000 26,000 4743 Banquet-Beverages - - - 19,000 26,000 26,000 27,000 27,000 4744 Banquet-Food(commissions) - - 1,381 - 3,750 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 4747 Golf-Beverages 1,946 - 24,060 11,329 - 6,500 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 4748 Banquet-Beer - - - - 10,000 10,000 10,000 11,000 11,000 4749 Banquet-Liquor/Wine - - - - 5,000 5,000 5,000 6,000 6,000 4760 Cart Food - - - 500 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 4761 Cart Beer - - - 4,250 2,500 2,500 4,000 4,000 4762 Cart Liquor - - - 4,000 2,500 2,500 3,000 3,000 4763 Cart Beverages - - - 4,500 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 4774 Banquet-Service Fees - - 2,171 - - - - 4779 Banquest-Rental Fees - - 25,137 - - - - Total _ 43,178 23,543 213,920 111,995 43,000 150,000 160,000 160,000 170,000 170,000 TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE 898,127 1,136,040 1,578,679 702,296 1,085,000 1,217,955 1,340,000 1,340,000 1,390,000 1,390,000 Other Non-Operating Revenues Annual Transfer - - - - 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 5399 Other Miscellaneous Revenues - 904 555 320 - - - - 4115 Pension Contributions GASB 68 547 664 - - - - 8205 Gain on Sale of Assets TOTAL REVENUE 898,674 1,137,608 1,579,234 702,616 1,085,000 1,367,955 1,490,000 1,490,000 1,540,000 1,540,000 Golf Recap: Green Fees 461,645 710,208 815,313 293,934 594,000 639,800 750,000 750,000 770,000 770,000 Cart Rentals 160,541 211,772 273,023 101,195 206,000 201,060 230,000 230,000 240,000 240,000 League Dues 16,989 16,228 48,109 60,695 22,000 22,220 25,000 25,000 27,000 27,000 Season Pass 84,016 30,852 33,407 43,157 38,000 70,000 30,000 30,000 32,000 32,000 Range 49,927 69,433 87,016 39,158 65,000 48,875 70,000 70,000 72,000 72,000 Lessons 5,620 270 7,110 7,570 8,000 8,000 5,000 5,000 7,000 7,000 Merchandise Sales 76,211 73,734 100,781 44,592 109,000 78,000 70,000 70,000 72,000 72,000 Subtotal 854,949 1,112,497 1,364,759 590,301 1,042,000 1,067,955 1,180,000 1,180,000 1,220,000 1,220,000 Food&Bev Recap by Product Type: Food&Non Alcoholic Beverage 9,396 6,853 55,725 26,159 - 48,000 55,000 55,000 57,000 57,000 Beer - - 85,675 39,827 - 59,250 53,500 53,500 57,000 57,000 Liquor&Wine - - 44,322 20,522 - 24,000 19,500 19,500 23,000 23,000 Banquet 18,176 7,808 28,198 (1,821) 18,000 15,000 25,000 25,000 26,000 26,000 Commissions-Concessions/Rentals 15,606 8,882 - 27,308 25,000 3,750 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 43,178 23,543 213,920 111,995 43,000 150,000 160,000 160,000 170,000 170,000 Total Operating Revenue 898,127 1,136,040 1,578,679 702,296 1,085,000 1,217,955 1,340,000 1,340,000 1,390,000 1,390,000 Annual Transfer - - - - - 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 Other Miscellaneous Revenues - 904 555 320 - - - - - - Pension GASB 68 547 664 - - - - - - - - Total Non-Operating Revenue 547 1,568 555 320 - 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 Total 898,674 1,137,608 1,579,234 702,616 1,085,000 1,367,955 1,490,000 1,490,000 1,540,000 1,540,000 269 COMPANY DEPARTMENT BUSINESS UNIT ACTIVITY 2010 70 2012 Cable Joint Powers DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY This fund is for the expenses of the Apple Valley, Farmington and Rosemount Cable Commission. Expenses are used in the production of videos created on behalf of the three city commission. Revenues for the fund come from quarterly invoices to the three cities. The commission cities estimate their future capital expenses in this budget, but the funding for the capital will not be collected in advance. Instead, the cities will receive invoices divided by formula at the time capital purchases are made. The three cities can then use their PEG funds to reimburse this fund for the exact amount of the capital expense. PEG revenues collected by the cities may only be used for capital expenses. MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2023 and 2024 1. Continue working with communications staff from each city to create engaging videos specific to each city based on a variety of topics. 2. Broadcast, stream and record specific public city meetings. 3. Offer again the video production intern position that was created in 2021. 4. Purchase and invoice member cities for Cable Commission capital purchases. 5. Coordinate with staff from member cities on non-PEG related audio/video projects. IMPACT MEASURES / PERFORMANCE INDICATORS - UPDATE Actual Actual Actual Projected Projected Projected Item 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 City Meeting Videos 112 109 120 130 130 Non-Meeting Videos 140 160 165 160 160 Hours of Programming Playback 16,700 18,500 20,000 22,000 22,000 Bulletin Board Messages 500 500 500 500 500 Regular Status Personnel Schedule—FTE's Adopted Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Position Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Video Operations Coordinator 1 1 1 1 1 1 Video Production Specialist 2 2 2 2 2 2 Temporary Status Personnel Schedule— Hours (Part Time) Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Proposed Position Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Cable Access Prod.Assistant 693 693 0 0 0 0 Meeting Operators 1120 1120 1120 1120 1120 1120 Video Production Intern 0 0 480 480 480 480 270 Summary Budget Department 70 Cable TV Joint Powers 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Proposed Proposed Proposed Revenue: PEG Fees - - - - - - 5340 Other City Shares 148,002 191,746 178,214 175,568 179,358 185,550 193,700 5010 Investment Earnings 1,552 1,688 (214) 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 5499 Transfer from Other Funds 148,118 191,746 175,568 175,568 179,358 185,550 193,700 Other Miscellaneous Revenue 192 339 853 - - - - 297,865 385,518 354,421 352,636 360,216 372,600 388,900 Expenditures: Salaries&Wages 194,973 201,702 220,590 237,160 245,575 253,440 265,120 Employee Benefits 72,899 76,419 80,393 87,275 87,317 91,760 96,380 Supplies 3,946 2,756 4,138 4,500 4,000 4,000 4,000 Contractual Services 1,008 1,785 1,482 4,700 4,700 4,700 4,700 Repairs&Maintenance 1,600 398 1,736 8,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 Training/Travel/Dues 3,133 5,409 2,573 7,000 8,500 8,500 8,500 Other Expenses 1,568 1,734 2,234 2,500 2,625 2,700 2,700 Capital Outlay 6,108 58,802 7,605 - - - - 285,235 349,005 320,751 351,135 358,717 371,100 387,400 Net addition to(use of)net 12,630 36,513 33,670 1,501 1,499 1,500 1,500 assets Fund Balance Beginning of Year $ 72,553 $ 85,183 $ 121,696 $ 121,696 $ 155,366 $ 156,865 $ 158,365 Revenues 297,865 385,518 354,421 352,636 360,216 372,600 388,900 Expenditures (285,235) (349,005) (320,751) (351,135) (358,717) (371,100) (387,400) End of Year 85,183 121,696 155,366 123,197 156,865 158,365 159,865 2023/2024 CAPITAL OUTLAY Capital equipment purchases will included replacement of the PTZ camera systems in each of the three council chambers. The Capital Outlay will be paid by member cities using their own respective PEG fee collections. City of Apple Valley 271 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) CABLE TV JOINT POWERS 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6110-SALARY-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 184,381 197,746 208,544 201,780 210,450 99,706 220,485 220,485 231,025 231,025 6111-SALARY PART-TIME 360 0 0 7,200 7,400 0 7,200 7,200 7,415 7,415 6112-SALARY-SEASONAL TEMP 10,232 2,183 10,220 17,200 17,500 7,936 15,120 15,120 15,575 15,575 6113-OVERTIME-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 4,431 10,661 12,912 3,000 3,000 2,601 3,100 3,100 3,200 3,200 6122-COMP REQUEST -4,431 -8,889 -11,086 -2,601 6123-SALARY-OTHER 7,980 7,225 7,535 7,535 7,905 7,905 6105-SALARIES AND WAGES 194,973 201,702 220,590 237,160 245,575 107,641 253,440 253,440 265,120 265,120 6138-MEDICARE 2,669 2,705 2,949 3,440 3,560 1,455 3,675 3,675 3,845 3,845 6139-FICA 11,411 11,565 12,609 14,705 15,225 6,220 15,715 15,715 16,435 16,435 6141-PENSIONS-PERA 13,985 14,988 16,282 17,250 17,865 7,587 19,010 19,010 19,885 19,885 6142-WORKERS COMPENSATION 837 521 690 690 675 397 735 735 805 805 6143-UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0 0 0 0 6144-LONG-TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE 369 399 349 585 600 149 630 630 655 655 6145-MEDICAL INSURANCE 51,164 58,455 61,453 50,605 49,392 24,274 51,995 51,995 54,755 54,755 6146-DENTAL INSURANCE 3,647 3,742 3,731 1,705 6147-LIFE INSURANCE-BASIC 18 18 20 28 6170-EMPLOYEE PAID PREMIUMS -11,202 -15,974 -17,690 0 -2,711 0 0 6125-EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 72,899 76,419 80,393 87,275 87,317 39,104 91,760 91,760 96,380 96,380 6100-TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 267,872 278,121 300,983 324,435 332,892 146,746 345,200 345,200 361,500 361,500 6210-OFFICE SUPPLIES 0 0 0 500 500 0 500 500 500 500 6211-SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT 969 337 1,152 1,000 500 1,915 500 500 500 500 6215-EQUIPMENT-PARTS 743 608 1,217 500 500 0 500 500 500 500 6229-GENERAL SUPPLIES 2,234 1,811 1,770 2,500 2,500 610 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 6205-SUPPLIES 3,946 2,756 4,138 4,500 4,000 2,525 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 6231-LEGAL SERVICES 347 1,178 860 660 6235-CONSULTANT SERVICES 0 0 0 3,500 3,500 423 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 6237-TELEPHONE/PAGERS 604 607 604 1,200 1,200 250 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 6238-POSTAGE/UPS/FEDEX 0 0 19 0 6239-PRINTING 58 0 0 131 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,008 1,785 1,482 4,700 4,700 1,463 4,700 4,700 4,700 4,700 6265-REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 1,600 398 1,736 8,000 6,000 12 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6260-REPAIRS AND MAINTENA 1,600 398 1,736 8,000 6,000 12 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6275-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL 0 160 0 3,000 3,000 0 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 6276-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP OTHER 0 701 0 0 6277-MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE 2,325 2,045 2,122 3,000 3,000 840 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 6280-DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 808 2,504 451 1,000 2,500 1,180 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 6270-TRNG/TRAVL/DUES/UNIF 3,133 5,409 2,573 7,000 8,500 2,020 8,500 8,500 8,500 8,500 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 9,687 10,349 9,929 24,200 23,200 6,020 23,200 23,200 23,200 23,200 6310-RENTAL EXPENSE 150 599 250 6311-INSURANCE-PROPERTY/LIABILITY 1,568 1,585 1,635 2,500 2,625 3,283 2,700 2,700 2,700 2,700 6333-GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS 0 -1 0 -3 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES 1,568 1,734 2,234 2,500 2,625 3,529 2,700 2,700 2,700 2,700 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES 1,568 1,734 2,234 2,500 2,625 3,529 2,700 2,700 2,700 2,700 6740-CAPITAL OUTLAY-MACH/EQ/OTHER 6,108 58,802 7,605 0 0 0 6701-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 6,108 58,802 7,605 0 0 0 6700-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 6,108 58,802 7,605 0 0 0 285,235 349,005 320,751 351,135 358,717 156,295 371,100 371,100 387,400 387,400 272 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 70: CABLE TV JOINT POWERS-2012 COMPANY 2010: CABLE TV JOINT POWERS JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND SALARIES 6110 Video Operations Coordinator 85,480 89,875 89,875 92,560 92,560 95,325 95,325 6110 Full-Time Employees-V.P.Specialist 116,300 120,575 120,575 127,925 127,925 135,700 135,700 6111 Part-Time Employees-Asst./Intern 7,200 7,400 7,400 7,200 7,200 7,415 7,415 6112 PT Employees-Control room operator 17,200 17,500 17,500 15,120 15,120 15,575 15,575 6113 Overtime-Reg 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,100 3,100 3,200 3,200 6123 Salaries-Other 7,980 7,225 7,225 7,535 7,535 7,905 7,905 6138 Medicare 3,440 3,560 3,560 3,675 3,675 3,845 3,845 6139 FICA 14,705 15,225 15,225 15,715 15,715 16,435 16,435 6141 Pension-PERA 17,250 17,865 17,865 19,010 19,010 19,885 19,885 6142 Worker Comp Insurance 690 675 675 735 735 805 805 6144 Long-term Disability Insurance 585 600 600 630 630 655 655 6145 Hospital&Life Insurance 50,605 49,392 49,392 51,995 51,995 54,755 54,755 Total 324,435 332,892 332,892 345,200 345,200 361,500 361,500 6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES Misc. 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 Total 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 6211 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT Miscellaneous 1,000 500 500 500 500 500 500 Total 1,000 500 500 500 500 500 500 6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS Miscellaneous 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 Total 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES Supplies 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 Total 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES Legal Fees 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 Technical Consulting - - - - - Total 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 6237 TELEPHONE/POSTAGE Cell Phone 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 Total 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT Non-Service Contract Repairs 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 Tightrope System Service Contract 2,000 Total 8,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6275 SCHOOL/CONFERENCES-LOCAL MACTA Annual Other 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 Total 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 6277 MILEAGE ALLOWANCE Coordinator Mileage 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 Producers Mileage 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 Total 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 6280 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS Association Dues - 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Annual Software Licenses 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 Music&Stock Library _ 500 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Total 1,000 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 6311 INSURANCE LMCIT Insurance _ 2,500 2,625 2,625 2,700 2,700 2,700 2,700 Total 2,500 2,625 2,625 2,700 2,700 2,700 2,700 6740 CAPITAL OUTLAY-OTHER ITEMS Edit Stations 15,000 Web Streaming 25,000 Camera Systems 20,000 20,000 Video Playback System 70,000 70,000 Chamber Cameras 120,000 120,000 Amount charged separately using PEG funds (40,000) (90,000) (90,000) (120,000) (120,000) Total - - - - - - - Total Net of Personnel 26,700 25,825 25,825 25,900 25,900 25,900 25,900 TOTAL EXPENSES(Operations) 351,135 358,717 358,717 $ 371,100 $ 371,100 $ 387,400 $ 387,400 Individual City shares are: Apple Valley 175,568 179,359 179,359 185,550 185,550 193,700 193,700 Farmington 87,784 89,679 89,679 92,775 92,775 96,850 96,850 Rosemount 87,784 89,679 89,679 92,775 92,775 96,850 96,850 273 COMPANY DEPARTMENT BUSINESS UNIT ACTIVITY 4810 81 4812 Cable Capital Equip-PEG DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY In 2018, the City approved a new cable television franchise agreement with Charter Communications. Under this agreement, the City is limited to utilizing PEG funds only for cable-related capital purchases. This fund was created to account for Apple Valley's PEG funds and expenditures under the capital restrictions. The assets can be divided into two categories. The first category is the equipment owned independently by the City of Apple Valley. This mainly includes audio visual equipment used for the Council Chambers. The second category is the equipment owned jointly by the Cities of Apple Valley, Farmington, and Rosemount as part of the joint powers cable commission. This would include editing stations, cameras, switchers, recorders, monitors and other equipment used for recording meetings, creating content and distribution of the channels. The PEG funds can be used to address capital either owned independently by the City or owned jointly by the cable joint powers commission. For 2023 the commission will be replacing camera equipment used for providing the video coverage in the council chambers of the three cities. MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2023 /2024 Summary Budget Department 81-Cable Capital Equip-PEG 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Proposed Proposed Proposed Revenue: 5335 All PEG Revenues 87,926 82,481 77,135 71,000 71,500 71,500 71,500 5010 Investment Earnings 4,197 5,539 (507) 500 1,500 1,000 1,000 92,123 88,020 76,628 71,500 73,000 72,500 72,500 Expenditures: Capital Outlay - 251,873 - 20,000 15,000 60,000 - Total - 251,873 - 20,000 15,000 60,000 - Fund Balance Beginning of Year $ 119,787 $ 211,910 $ 48,057 $ 48,057 $ 124,685 $ 182,685 $ 195,185 Revenues 92,123 88,020 76,628 71,500 73,000 72,500 72,500 Expenditures - (251,873) - (5,250) (15,000) (60,000) End of Year 211,910 48,057 124,685 114,307 182,685 195,185 267,685 2023: Chambers Cameras $120,000 x 50% Apple Valley Share $60,000 2024: None City of Apple Valley 274 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) CABLE CAPITAL EQUIP-PEG 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6740-CAPITAL OUTLAY-MACH/EQ/OTHER 0 0 0 20,000 15,000 18,570 60,000 60,000 0 0 6701-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 0 0 0 20,000 15,000 18,570 60,000 60,000 0 0 6700-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 0 0 0 20,000 15,000 18,570 60,000 60,000 0 0 6810-CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS 251,873 0 0 6801-TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS 251,873 0 0 6800-TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS 251,873 0 0 7101-TOTAL TRANSFERS 7100-TOTAL TRANSFERS 0 251,873 0 20,000 15,000 18,570 60,000 60,000 0 0 275 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2022 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 81: CABLE CAPITAL EQUIP-PEG COMPANY 4810: CABLE CAPITAL EQUIP-PEG JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND 6740 CAPITAL OUTLAY-OTHER ITEMS Miscellaneous 20,000 15,000 15,000 60,000 60,000 - - Total 20,000 15,000 15,000 60,000 60,000 - - TOTAL EXPENSES 20,000 15,000 15,001 60,000 60,000 - - 276 ••• •••• ••••• ••• AppValley Notes: 277 COMPANY DEPARTMENT BUSINESS UNIT ACTIVITY 4815 101 4817 Cable TV Special Revenue-NONPEG DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY Cable TV expenditures are reflected in three separate budget funds. The general operations of the joint powers cable commission and the capital equipment are found in separate funds due to legal requirements regarding PEG revenues. This fund was established to separate and prevent co-mingling of funding sources. Specifically, starting in 2017, PEG revenues can only be used for capital purchases. Since the joint powers commission is jointly funded, it is desirable for Apple Valley's cable-related revenues not to be directly inter-mingled with revenues from the partner cities. This fund receives its revenues from the cable television franchise fees. The expenses from this fund fall into three main categories. 1) This fund pays the Apple Valley share of the joint powers cable commission budget, which includes Council and Planning Commission meetings. 2) This fund pays for webcasting, legal, and other minor operational expenses that are incurred directly by the City and not the Commission. 3) This fund pays for special additional Apple Valley programming that is above and beyond what is provided to the cities under the joint powers agreement. This additional programming includes Park and Recreation Committee meetings and occasional other special City meetings. MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2023 1. Update online distribution of all produced programming to supplement cable television IMPACT MEASURES / PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual Actual Actual Actual Projected Projected Item 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Council meetings 25 25 25 23 25 25 Planning Commission 24 24 14 16 24 24 meetings Parks Advisory meetings 5 5 3 5 5 5 Regular Status Personnel Schedule—FTE's Adopted Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Position Title 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 None 278 Summary Budget Department 101 Cable Special Revenue Fund 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Proposed Proposed Proposed Revenue: 5335 Excess Franchise Revenue 120,493 48,283 223,391 150,000 150,000 202,000 210,000 I5010 Investment Earnings - 3,701 - 500 500 - - 120,493 51,984 223,391 150,500 150,500 202,000 210,000 Expenditures: Salaries&Wages - 265 3,063 - - - - Employee Benefits - 36 255 - - - - Supplies - - 1,195 1,195 1,195 1,195 Contractual Services - 2,085 8,588 12,500 12,500 12,500 12,500 Repairs& Maintenance - - 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 Training/Travel/Dues - - - - - - Capital Outlay - - - - - - ,Transfers Out - 191,746 175,568 175,568 179,358 185,550 193,700 Other Expenses - - - - Total - 194,132 187,474 191,063 194,853 201,045 209,195 Fund Balance Beginning of Year $ - $ 120,493 $ (21,655) $ (21,655) $ 14,262 $ (30,091) $ (29,136) Revenues 120,493 51,984 223,391 150,500 150,500 202,000 210,000 Expenditures - (194,132) (187,474) (191,063) (194,853) (201,045) (209,195) End of Year 120,493 (21,655) 14,262 (62,218) (30,091) (29,136) (28,331) 2023 CAPITAL OUTLAY None 2024 CAPITAL OUTLAY None City of Apple Valley 279 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) CABLE TV SPECIAL REV-NONPEG 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6112-SALARY-SEASONAL TEMP 265 3,063 1,702 6105-SALARIES AND WAGES 265 3,063 1,702 6138-MEDICARE 6 43 25 6139-FICA 27 183 105 6141-PENSIONS-PERA 3 29 30 6142-WORKERS COMPENSATION 2 6125-EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 36 255 163 6100-TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 301 3,318 1,864 6210-OFFICE SUPPLIES 350 350 350 350 350 350 6211-SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT 70 70 70 70 70 70 6215-EQUIPMENT-PARTS 500 500 500 500 500 500 6229-GENERAL SUPPLIES 275 275 275 275 275 275 6205-SUPPLIES 1,195 1,195 1,195 1,195 1,195 1,195 6231-LEGAL SERVICES 248 0 6235-CONSULTANT SERVICES 2,085 8,340 12,500 12,500 3,475 12,500 12,500 12,500 12,500 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,085 8,588 12,500 12,500 3,475 12,500 12,500 12,500 12,500 6265-REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 6260-REPAIRS AND MAINTENA 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 2,085 8,588 15,495 15,495 3,475 15,495 15,495 15,495 15,495 7110-TRANSFER TO OTHER FUNDS 191,746 175,568 175,568 179,358 0 185,550 185,550 193,700 193,700 7101-TOTAL TRANSFERS 191,746 175,568 175,568 179,358 0 185,550 185,550 193,700 193,700 7100-TOTAL TRANSFERS 191,746 175,568 175,568 179,358 0 185,550 185,550 193,700 193,700 194,132 187,473 191,063 194,853 5,339 201,045 201,045 209,195 209,195 280 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2022 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 101: CABLE SPECIAL REVENUE-NONPEG COMPANY 4815: CABLE SPECIAL REVENUE-NONPEG JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND 6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES Miscellaneous 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 Total 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 6211 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT Miscellaneous 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 Total 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS Miscellaneous 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 Total 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES Dubbing tapes,cables,etc. 275 275 275 275 275 275 275 Total 275 275 275 275 275 275 275 6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES Park&Recreation-Addl City Meetings 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 Legal Fees 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Swagit Productions 8,500 8,500 8,500 8,500 8,500 8,500 8,500 Total 12,500 12,500 12,500 12,500 12,500 12,500 12,500 6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT Miscellaneous 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 Total 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 7110 TRANSFER TO CABLE TV FUND Transfers 175,568 179,358 179,358 185,550 185,550 193,700 193,700 Total 175,568 179,358 179,358 185,550 185,550 193,700 193,700 TOTAL EXPENSES 191,063 194,853 194,853 201,045 201,045 209,195 209,195 281 COMPANY DEPARTMENT BUSINESS UNIT ACTIVITY 4930 103 4930 Future Capital Projects DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY The Future Capital Projects Fund was created to accumulate funds for the future replacement of City assets. The funding source for this fund are the amounts transferred from the General Fund that exceed the amounts established by the Fund Balance Policy at the end of each fiscal year. MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2023 and 2024- Ongoing budgets includes support of the Municipal Building, the Fire Facilities and the Park Facilities Funds and the annual street and infrastructure program. In addition for 2023 there is a one-time transfer to fund a portion of the on-course improvements as identified in the Valleywood Business Plan. In 2024, $750,000 in funding is included for the parking lot improvements at the Municipal Center. Summary Budget Department -Future Capital Projects Fund 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Adopted# Proposed Proposed Revenue: Investment Earnings 480,457 404,816 (97,578) 180,000 150,000 150,000 189,000 Interfund Loan repayment-2012 INTEREST 7,190 21,457 - 6,461 10,945 10,151 9,350 Interfund Loan repayment-2016 INTEREST 383 355 - 325 - - - Proceeds from Sale of Assets 367,440 - - Conduit Debt Fee Received - - 89,150 -Transfer from General Fund 350,000 2,900,000 1,150,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 1,205,470 3,326,628 1,141,572 686,786 660,945 660,151 698,350 Expenditures: Legal Services - - 1,500 - - - - Capital Outlay-Cedar Ave Monument - - - 60,000 - - - Capital Outlay-Ameresco 192,459 - - - - - - Pickelball Courts - - 250,000 250,000 - - - Reconstruction of Western Service Center Parking - - - 120,000 - - - Transfer Out-Valleywood On-Course Improvements - - - - 1,000,000 Transfer Out-Parking Lot-City Hall - - - - - - 750,000 Transfer out-Storm Water Fund-City Hall Pond - - 300,000 300,000 - - - Transfer out-Street Maintenance Program 240,326 - 412,500 412,500 660,000 604,000 890,000 Transfer out-Muni Bldg Fund-# 212,000 1,002,000 218,000 218,000 - - - Transfer out-Park Facilities-# - - - - 225,000 125,000 195,000 Total 644,785 1,002,000 1,182,000 1,360,500 885,000 1,729,000 1,835,000 Fund Balance Beginning of Year $ 14,300,139 $ 14,860,824 $ 17,185,452 $ 17,185,452 $ 17,145,024 $ 14,820,306 $ 13,751,457 Revenues 1,205,470 3,326,628 1,141,572 686,786 660,945 660,151 698,350 Budget Item Carried Over - - - - 250,000 - - Eliminate valleywood Clubhouse loan (2,350,663) - - Expenditures (644,785) (1,002,000) (1,182,000) (1,360,500) (885,000) (1,729,000) (1,835,000) End of Year 14,860,824 17,185,452 17,145,024 16,511,738 14,820,306 13,751,457 12,614,807 Note#-the 2022 Budget amounts have been restated to split the 2022 adopted budget into the two new funds; Fire Facilities and Park Facilities Fund 2023 Capital Outlay: Valleywood on-course Improvements $1,000,000 2024 Capital Outlay: Municipal Center East Parking lot $ 750,000 City of Apple Valley 282 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) FUTURE CAPITAL PROJECTS 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6205-SUPPLIES 0 0 0 0 6231-LEGAL SERVICES 0 0 1,500 0 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0 0 1,500 0 0 0 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 0 0 1,500 0 0 0 6715-CAPITAL OUTLAY-BUILDINGS 192,459 0 0 0 6735-CAPITAL OUTLAY-OTHER IMPROVEME 0 0 0 430,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 6701-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 192,459 0 0 430,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 6700-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 192,459 0 0 430,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 6810-CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS 0 0 250,000 0 6801-TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS 0 0 250,000 0 6800-TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS 0 0 250,000 0 7001-TOTAL INTEREST AND FISCAL FEES 0 0 0 0 7000-TOTAL INTEREST AND FISCAL FEES 0 0 0 0 7110-TRANSFER TO OTHER FUNDS 452,326 1,002,000 930,500 930,500 885,000 0 729,000 1,729,000 729,000 1,835,000 7101-TOTAL TRANSFERS 452,326 1,002,000 930,500 930,500 885,000 0 729,000 1,729,000 729,000 1,835,000 7100-TOTAL TRANSFERS 452,326 1,002,000 930,500 930,500 885,000 0 729,000 1,729,000 729,000 1,835,000 644,785 1,002,000 1,182,000 1,360,500 885,000 0 729,000 1,729,000 729,000 1,835,000 283 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT:103 FUTURE CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND(4932) COMPANY 4930:FUTURE CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2022 2023 2024 ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL COUNCIL COUNCIL PROJECTED ADMIN ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED# RECOMMENDED RECOMMENDED Source of Funds Investment Earnings $ 480,457 $ 404,816 $ (97,578) $ 180,000 $ 150,000 $ - $ 150,000 $ 189,000 Valleywood Loan Repayment(Prin)-ClubhousE 42,810 20,972 43,539 Valleywood Loan Repayment(Int)-ClubhousE 7,190 13,886 6,461 Valleywood Loan Repayment(Prin)-Parking Lo 7,571 7,571 7,246 Valleywood Loan Repayment(Int)-Parking Lo 325 Ice Arena Loan Repayment(Prin)-Ice Plant 69,055 69,055 69,849 70,650 Ice Arena Loan Repayment(Int)-Ice Plant 10,945 10,945 10,151 9,350 Transfer from General Fund 350,000 2,900,000 1,150,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 Conduit Debt Fee 89,150 Other Revenue-Sale of Assets 367,440 - - - Total Source of Funds $ 1,255,468 $ 3,347,245 $ 1,141,572 $ 737,571 $ 730,000 $ 580,000 $ 730,000 $ 769,000 Use of Funds 6735 CAPITAL OUTLAY Admin Cedar Avenue Entrance Monument 60,000 60,000 - Municipal Center Muni Center Lower Level Finish 800,000 Parks Pickleball Courts - 250,000 250,000 Public Works Reconstruct Western Service Center Entrance 120,000 Ameresco Energy Project 192,459 Total Capital Outlay 192,459 800,000 250,000 430,000 60,000 - - - 7110 TRANSFERS Transfer to Park Bond Transfer to Storm Water Fund-City Hall Pond Improvements 300,000 300,000 Transfer to Road Improvement Fund-Muni Center Parking Lot 750,000 Transfer to Road Improvement Fund-Cedar Ave/140th Overpass Transfer to Road Improvement Fund 220,000 - 412,500 412,500 600,000 600,000 604,000 890,000 Transfer to Valleywood Improvement Fund-On-Course Improvement: 1,000,000 Transfer to Parks Facilities Fund-# 225,000 125,000 195,000 Transfer to Municipal Building Fund-# 240,326 202,000 218,000 218,000 225,000 Total Transfers 460,326 202,000 930,500 930,500 825,000 825,000 1,729,000 1,835,000 Total Use of Funds $ 652,785 $ 1,002,000 $ 1,180,500 $ 1,360,500 $ 885,000 $ 825,000 $ 1,729,000 $ 1,835,000 Net Change $ 602,683 $ 2,345,245 $ (38,928) $ (622,929) $ (155,000) $ (245,000) $ (999,000) $ (1,066,000) Note#-the 2022 Budget amounts have been restated to split the 2022 adopted budget into the two new funds;Fire Facilities and Park Facilities Fund 284 ••• •••• ••••• ••• AppValley Notes: 285 COMPANY DEPARTMENT BUSINESS UNIT ACTIVITY 3210 93 3212 EDA Operations Fund DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY The EDA Operations fund was created initially to focus on the activities related to the Valley Business Park development, including a revolving loan program and the development and sale of commercial lots. That activity was completed and the EDA Operations fund assists the EDA in supporting business development opportunities as they arise. MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2023 and 2024 • Continue the master planning of the Mixed Business Campus (MBC) with the identified owner/developer, Rockport LLC; attracting business and development. • Respond to site selectors from DEED/GREATER MSP. • Facilitate job creation from construction and occupancy of commercial, industrial and housing production. • Continue Open to Business assistance services with the Dakota County CDA. • Continue as a member of GREATER MSP, the regional economic development organization with national and global contacts for local business development. • Facilitate improvement of properties in the northwest quadrant of CR42 and Cedar Avenue. • Apply a portion of lease revenues from the Education Building toward EDA business development initiatives when possible. IMPACT MEASURES / PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual Actual Actual Projected Projected Projected Item 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Jobs added(perm.and const.) 500 300 500 500 500 500 Bus. Dev./AV Clients Served 5 9 19 20 20 20 Summary Budget Department 93 EDA Operations Fund 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Revenue: Building Mgmt Fee 50,000 - - 50,000 - - - County Grants-Parking Lot - - - - - - - Grants-MC&Other 500,000 - 353,981 - - - - Admin Fees-Other Funds - 50,000 - - - - - Refunds/Reimbursements - 574,320 - - - - - Other Transfers In - 399,850 - - - - - Investment Earnings 24,868 27,110 (8,286) 400 10,000 10,000 10,000 574,868 1,051,280 345,695 50,400 10,000 10,000 10,000 Expenditures: Salaries&Wages - 108 (54) 550 550 600 600 Emp.Benefits - 8 8 50 50 50 50 Supplies - - - - - - - Contractual Serv. 2,985 - 6,500 8,000 8,500 9,000 9,000 Training/Travel/Dues 10,175 18,800 11,000 11,850 12,100 12,500 12,500 Developer Asstistance 500,000 399,850 353,981 - - - - Capital outlay - - - - - - - Total Expenditure 513,160 418,766 371,435 20,450 21,200 22,150 22,150 Fund Balance Beginning 743,521 805,229 1,437,743 1,437,743 1,467,693 1,467,693 1,456,493 Ending 805,229 1,437,743 1,412,003 1,467,693 1,456,493 1,455,543 1,444,343 2023 &2024 CAPITAL OUTLAY: None City of Apple Valley 286 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) EDA OPERATIONS 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6110-SALARY-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 550 550 600 600 600 600 6112-SALARY-SEASONAL TEMP 0 108 -54 54 6105-SALARIES AND WAGES 0 108 -54 550 550 54 600 600 600 600 6138-MEDICARE 0 2 1 50 50 1 50 50 50 50 6139-FICA 0 7 3 0 0 3 6141-PENSIONS-PERA 0 0 4 0 6125-EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 0 8 8 50 50 4 50 50 50 50 6100-TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 0 116 -46 600 600 58 650 650 650 650 6235-CONSULTANT SERVICES 2,985 0 6,500 8,000 8,500 8,100 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,985 0 6,500 8,000 8,500 8,100 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 6276-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 6278-SUBSISTENCE ALLOWANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 6280-DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 10,175 18,800 11,000 11,850 12,100 0 12,500 11,000 12,500 11,000 6270-TRNG/TRAVL/DUES/UNIF 10,175 18,800 11,000 11,850 12,100 0 12,500 11,000 12,500 11,000 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 13,160 18,800 17,500 19,850 20,600 8,100 21,500 20,000 21,500 20,000 6397-DEVELOPER ASSISTANCE 500,000 0 353,981 0 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES 500,000 0 353,981 0 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES 500,000 0 353,981 0 6801-TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS 0 0 0 0 6800-TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS 0 0 0 0 513,160 18,916 371,436 20,450 21,200 8,158 22,150 20,650 22,150 20,650 287 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 93:EDA OPERATIONS FUND-3212 COMPANY 3210: EDA OPERATIONS 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND SALARIES 6110 Regular Employees 550 550 550 600 600 600 600 6138 Medicare _ 50 _ 50 50 50 50 50 50 Total 600 600 600 650 650 650 650 6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES Open to Business 8,000 8,500 8,500 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 Total 8,000 8,500 8,500 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 6280 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS Membership in local chapters of Nordic Chambers of Commerce 1,500 1,500 1,500 - - - - Greater MSP 10,350 10,600 10,600 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 Sister City - - - - - - - Total 11,850 12,100 12,100 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 Total Net of Personnel 19,850 20,600 20,600 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 TOTAL EXPENSES $ 20,450 $ 21,200 $ 21,200 $ 20,650 $ 20,650 $ 20,650 $ 20,650 288 ... .... ..... ..• AppValley Notes: 289 COMPANY DEPARTMENT BUSINESS UNIT ACTIVITY 2025 74 2027 ROAD IMPROVEMENT FUND DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY The Road Improvement Fund provides for a consolidated source for city street improvements within the City of Apple Valley. Street improvements under this activity include new street construction, street reconstruction, street resurfacing (overlay), pavement preservation (micro surface, crack sealing, seal coating), and traffic signal improvements based on projects identified in the City's Capital Improvement Program. Street improvement practices are guided by the City's pavement management. Revenue for funding the improvements listed above is derived from several sources, including the Street Improvement Property Tax Levy, the Municipal State Aid Maintenance and Construction Allotments (City's share of State gas tax), revenue from special assessments, funding contributions from the Water, Sewer and Storm Drainage Utilities, Electric Franchise Fee and Tax Increment Financing (exclusive for specific TIF funded street projects). MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2023 and 2024: The major objective for this business unit is to complete the construction of the following projects in 2023 and 2024: Anticipated Contract Award Project Title Timeline 2023 Street& Utility Improvements Spring 2023 • Walnut Lane/Juniper Lane 2023 Feasibility Study—Apple Valley Additions Spring 2023 2023 Micro surfacing Project Summer 2023 2023 Crack sealing Project Summer 2023 2023 Street Improvements (State Aid) Spring 2023 • Hayes Road (140th to 150th) • 157th Street W (Cedar to Galaxie) 2023 Street Improvements Summer 2023 142nd Street (Cedar to Galaxie) 2023 Intersection Improvements Summer 2023 147th St W Roundabout (Cedar to Glazier) 2023 Utility Improvements Summer 2023 2023 Ring Route Boulevard Streetscape Improvements Summer 2023 2023 Miscellaneous Intersection &ADA Improvements Summer 2023 2024 Street& Utility Improvements Spring 2024 • Greenleaf 4th Addition (lower 134th, Fernando Ave, Fernando Ct., Ferris) 2024 Micro surfacing Project Summer 2024 2024 Crack sealing Project Summer 2024 2024 Street Improvements (State Aid) Spring 2024 • 153rd Street (Central Village) • 127th Street (Galaxie to Cedar) 2024 Street Improvements Spring 2024 • Whitney Drive (Garden View to Redwood) 290 • Central Village (152nd, Fortino, Founders, Fresco, Gabella, Gallivant) 2024 Utility Improvements Summer 2024 2024 Miscellaneous Intersection &ADA Improvements Summer 2024 2024 Ring Route Boulevard Streetscape Improvements Summer 2024 2024 City Hall East Parking Lot Improvements Summer 2024 PERSONNEL / STAFFING Regular Status Personnel Schedule- FTE's Adopted Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Position Title 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 None Summary Budget Department 74,Fund 2025 Road Improvement Fund 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Revenue: Transfer from General Fund(Prop Tax Support) 3,437,000 3,540,000 3,664,000 3,664,000 3,801,000 3,971,000 4,360,000 Transfer from Future Capital Project Fund 240,326 - 412,500 412,500 600,000 604,000 1,640,000 Transfer from other Funds(Close MSA Bond Fund) - 795,054 State Aid(MSA) 6,014,144 3,597,327 572,483 2,223,000 1,859,500 2,700,000 3,396,000 Special Assessments 51,790 94,977 37,687 - - - Other Entity/Government Share 230,071 100,000 912,800 Other-Federal&Other Grants - - - 3,278,000 80,000 80,000 Other Misc. 275 655 755 - - - - Subtotal Revenues 9,973,606 8,128,013 4,687,425 7,212,300 9,538,500 7,355,000 9,476,000 Project Costs Charged Directly to other Funds Water Utility Fund Support - - - 844,000 444,000 690,000 850,000 Sewer Utility Fund Support - - - 891,000 614,500 620,000 750,000 Stormwater Utility Fund Support - - - 704,000 507,500 750,000 1,365,000 Other Fund support - - - 328,000 25,000 135,000 250,000 Tax Increment(Existing) - - - 2,700,000 2,700,000 - - Total Project Costs Charged Directly to other Funds - - - 5,467,000 4,291,000 2,195,000 3,215,000 Total Sources 9,973,606 8,128,013 4,687,425 12,679,300 13,829,500 9,550,000 12,691,000 Expenditures: Supplies 40 2,280 1,028 - - - Contractual Services 1,235,789 725,707 710,692 - - - Construction 7,131,442 6,145,116 3,096,350 12,679,300 13,292,500 7,131,000 9,476,000 Other Expenses 30 300 - - - - Total Exp 8,367,301 6,873,403 3,808,070 12,679,300 13,292,500 7,131,000 9,476,000 Net addition to(use of)Road Imp.Fund Balance 1,606,305 1,254,610 879,355 - 537,000 224,000 - City of Apple Valley 291 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) ROAD IMPROVEMENT 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6229-GENERAL SUPPLIES 40 2,280 1,028 1,578 6205-SUPPLIES 40 2,280 1,028 1,578 6231-LEGAL SERVICES 938 0 185 352 6234-CITY ENGINEER CONSULTANT SERV 317,137 217,468 255,108 191,190 6235-CONSULTANT SERVICES 916,492 506,888 454,636 0 0 239,820 6239-PRINTING 1,222 1,350 764 1,062 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,235,789 725,707 710,692 0 0 432,424 6260-REPAIRS AND MAINTENA 0 0 0 0 6270-TRNG/TRAVL/DUES/UNIF 0 0 0 0 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 1,235,829 727,987 711,720 0 0 434,002 6399-OTHER CHARGES 30 300 0 0 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES 30 300 0 0 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES 30 300 0 0 6735-CAPITAL OUTLAY-OTHER IMPROVEME -83,580 96,000 84,393 12,679,300 13,292,500 0 6,440,000 7,131,000 9,476,000 9,476,000 6740-CAPITAL OUTLAY-MACH/EQ/OTHER 0 0 180 0 6701-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY -83,580 96,000 84,573 12,679,300 13,292,500 0 6,440,000 7,131,000 9,476,000 9,476,000 6700-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY -83,580 96,000 84,573 12,679,300 13,292,500 0 6,440,000 7,131,000 9,476,000 9,476,000 6810-CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS 7,215,022 6,049,116 3,011,777 1,713,727 6801-TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS 7,215,022 6,049,116 3,011,777 1,713,727 6800-TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS 7,215,022 6,049,116 3,011,777 1,713,727 7101-TOTAL TRANSFERS 0 0 0 0 7100-TOTAL TRANSFERS 0 0 0 0 8,367,301 6,873,403 3,808,069 12,679,300 13,292,500 2,147,729 6,440,000 7,131,000 9,476,000 9,476,000 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET 292 ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 74: ROAD IMPROVEMENT FUND-2026 and 2027 Public Works Department COMPANY 2025: Road Improvement Fund JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND REVENUE 5499 Road Improvement-Transfer from General Fund 3,664,000 3,801,000 3,801,000 4,071,000 3,971,000 4,360,000 4,360,000 5499 Future Capital Project Fund 412,500 600,000 600,000 604,000 604,000 1,640,000 1,640,000 Total Transfers 4,076,500 4,401,000 4,401,000 4,675,000 4,575,000 6,000,000 6,000,000 5399 Special Assessments-Street Improvements - - - - - - - 5399 County/Other Entity Cost Participation 912,800 4150 Grants-Other Govt Units 178,000 178,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 4145 Other Federal Grants - 3,100,000 1,500,000 - - 4125 MSA Maintenance 600,000 599,500 599,500 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 4125 MSA Construction 1,623,000 1,260,000 1,260,000 2,791,000 2,791,000 2,796,000 2,796,000 Intergovernmental 3,135,800 5,137,500 3,537,500 3,471,000 3,471,000 3,476,000 3,476,000 Subtotal Revenues 7,212,300 9,538,500 7,938,500 8,146,000 8,046,000 9,476,000 9,476,000 Project Costs Charged Directly to other Funds 6735 Water Utility-Annual Street Improvements 844,000 444,000 444,000 690,000 690,000 850,000 850,000 6735 Sanitary Utility-Annual Street Improvements 891,000 614,500 614,500 620,000 620,000 750,000 750,000 6735 Storm Drainage-Annual Street Improvements 704,000 507,500 507,500 750,000 750,000 1,365,000 1,365,000 6735 Street Light Utility 45,000 25,000 25,000 130,000 130,000 250,000 250,000 6735 Other Funds 283,000 - - 5,000 5,000 - - 6735 TIF Projects Direct Charged to TIF Funds 2,700,000 2,700,000 - - - - - Total Project Costs Charged Directly to other Funds 5,467,000 4,291,000 1,591,000 2,195,000 2,195,000 3,215,000 3,215,000 Total Sources 12,679,300 13,829,500 9,529,500 10,341,000 10,241,000 12,691,000 12,691,000 6735 CAPITAL OUTLAY-IMPROVEMENTS 2024 Projects Greenleaf 4th Addition Street and Utility(lower 134th,Fernando,Ferris) 4,600,000 4,600,000 Whitney Drive(Garden View to Redwood)Street Improvements 1,905,000 1,905,000 Central Village(152nd,Fortino,Founders,Fresco,Gabella,Gallivant)Street Improvements 1,160,000 1,160,000 153rd Street(Central Village)Street Improvements 371,000 371,000 127th Street(Galaxie to Cedar)Mill and Overlay 650,000 650,000 Annual Ringroute Repairs 50,000 50,000 Trail Resurfacing 180,000 180,000 2024 Microsurfacing Pavement Preservaton 400,000 400,000 2024 Cracksealing Pavement Preservation 200,000 200,000 Miscellaneous Intersection Improvements 150,000 150,000 ADA General Improvements 50,000 50,000 City Hall East Parking Lot Improvements 750,000 750,000 Ringroute Blvd Improvements 700,000 700,000 CSAH 42 Trail(Flagstaff-Pilot Knob)Phase 1 105,000 105,000 CSAH 42 Traffic Signal/Intersection/Pedestrian Upgrades 1,250,000 1,250,000 CSAH 33(Diamond Path)Corridor Study 70,000 70,000 Water Main Break Street Patching 100,000 100,000 2023 Projects Redwood/Juniper Street and Utility Walnut Lane(Elm Dr-Park Ln),Edgewood Ln,Park Ln Street Reconstruction 3,500,000 3,500,000 Feasibility Study-Apple Valley Additions 4th-10th 200,000 200,000 142nd St(Cedar to Galaxie)Street Reconstruction 1,400,000 1,400,000 157th(Cedar to Galaxie) 683,100 683,100 Hayes Road(150th to 140th) 1,016,900 1,016,900 Annual Ringroute Repairs 50,000 50,000 Trail Resurfacing 180,000 180,000 2023 Microsurfacing Pavement Preservaton 500,000 500,000 2023 Cracksealing Pavement Preservation 100,000 100,000 Miscellaneous Intersection Improvements 150,000 150,000 ADA General Improvements 50,000 50,000 Ringroute Blvd Improvements 700,000 700,000 Water Main Break Street Patching 100,000 100,000 Crackseal Cemetery Road&Lot 5,000 5,000 2022 Projects Redwood/Juniper Street and Utility 2,060,000 2,285,000 Euclid Ct,Eveleth Ct,139th St Ct Street Reconstruction 2,015,000 1,805,000 Street Overlay/Resurfacing 1,985,000 1,860,000 Annual Ringroute Repairs 50,000 50,000 Trail Resurfacing 180,000 - 2022 Microsurfacing Pavement Preservaton 499,500 275,000 2022 Cracksealing Pavement Preservation 100,000 100,000 Misc Intersection Improvements 150,000 150,000 ADA General Improvements 50,000 50,000 Metro Red Line Bike and Ped Improvements 123,000 123,000 CSAH 23(Cedar)/140th St.-Pedestrian Overpass(Construction) CSAH 33(Diamond Path)/140th St.-Roundabout(City share cost) 691,000 CSAH 38 ATMS signal upgrades(City Share only) 250,000 250,000 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET 293 ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 74: ROAD IMPROVEMENT FUND-2026 and 2027 Public Works Department COMPANY 2025: Road Improvement Fund JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND 2021 Projects Cimmarron Road/Surrey Trail(Phase 2) 4,707,000 133rd Street(Galaxie to Flagstaff) 1,510,000 3,100,000 3,100,000 Street Overlay/Resurfacing 1,109,000 HAWK Traffic Signal at Greenleaf on Galaxie 312,000 Ring Route Benches and Trash Bins 81,000 Trail Resurfacing 180,000 2021 Microsurfacing Pavement Preservaton 500,000 2021 Cracksealing Pavement Preservation 100,000 Misc Intersection Improvements 100,000 ADA General Improvements 50,000 Cedar Ave/Ring Route Concrete&Landscape Improveme 30,000 30,000 147th/Glazier Improvements 2,700,000 2,700,000 CR 42 Corridor Visioning Study 850,300 2020 Projects Signal Install Galaxie/132nd St. 400,000 Annual Ring Route Concrete Improvements 50,000 Cedar Avenue Pedestrian Connections Subtotal 12,679,300 13,292,500 10,048,000 8,635,000 9,326,000 12,691,000 12,691,000 Less project cost directly charged to Other Funds (5,467,000) (4,291,000) (1,591,000) (2,195,000) (2,195,000) (3,215,000) (3,215,000) Total 7,212,300 9,001,500 8,457,000 6,440,000 7,131,000 9,476,000 9,476,000 TOTAL EXPENSES $ 7,212,300 $ 9,001,500 $ 8,457,000 $ 6,440,000 $ 7,131,000 $ 9,476,000 $ 9,476,000 Revenue $ 7,212,300 $ 9,538,500 $ 7,938,500 $ 8,146,000 $ 8,046,000 $ 9,476,000 $ 9,476,000 NET EXPENSES $ - $ 537,000 $ (518,500) $ 1,706,000 $ 915,000 $ - $ - 294 ••• •••• ••••• ••• AppValley Notes: 295 COMPANY DEPARTMENT BUSINESS UNIT ACTIVITY 2090 80 2092 Education Building Fund DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY The Education Building Fund accounts for the operations of the former City Hall property. MacPhail School of Music and Schmitt Music leases the property as an education and supporting music retail facility. A large classroom space previously leased by St. Mary's University is retained as a voting location by the City Clerk. Background In 2001, the City moved its operations to the Municipal Center location and vacated the former City Hall property. As the City did not have an immediate use for the property, and remained sensitive to the type of new uses at this location, the City chose to rent the property to a select group of education tenants. A long term lease with DCTC and St. Mary's for education purposes continued and has evolved in the direction of music education since 2018. The City continues to maintain the facility for the tenants with lease revenues. Source of Funds The fund receives its revenues from two primary sources-rents received from the tenants and invested fund balance. MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2023 and 2024 Maintain tenants and building management and maintenance. Summary Budget Department 80-Education Building Fund 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Revenue: 5199 Rents $ 226,920 $ 165,010 $ 65,320 $ 155,000 $ 153,880 $ 157,000 $ 160,000 5010/5013 Investment Earnings 5,273 7,883 (1,364) _ 2,500 2,000 1,000 1,000 232,193 172,893 63,956 157,500 155,880 158,000 161,000 Expenditures: Supplies - 95 - 50 50 50 50 Contractual Services 134,986 84,572 37,344 33,550 34,550 33,640 33,640 Utilities 20,381 17,026 17,806 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 Repairs&Maintenance 36,618 8,294 13,887 19,450 19,450 19,450 19,450 Other Expenses 6,945 7,372 6,501 6,500 8,000 8,200 8,200 Capital Outlay/Construction Costs 2,887 8,400 14,636 42,000 30,000 45,000 15,000 Total 201,817 125,759 90,174 123,550 114,050 128,340 98,340 30,376 47,134 (26,218) Fund Balance Beginning of Year $ 114,423 $ 144,799 $ 191,933 $ 191,933 $ 165,715 $ 207,545 $ 237,205 Revenues 232,193 172,893 63,956 157,500 155,880 158,000 161,000 Expenses (201,817) (125,759) (90,174) (123,550) (114,050) (128,340) (98,340) End of Year $ 144,799 $ 191,933 $ 165,715 $ 225,883 $ 207,545 $ 237,205 $ 299,865 2023 Capital Outlay: Roof $30,000 Painting/Siding Repair $15,000 2024 Capital Outlay: Painting/Siding Repair $15,000 City of Apple Valley 296 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) EDUCATION BUILDING FUND 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6105-SALARIES AND WAGES 0 0 0 0 6125-EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 0 0 0 0 6100-TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 0 0 0 0 6210-OFFICE SUPPLIES 3,392 0 0 6211-SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT 31,272 0 0 6215-EQUIPMENT-PARTS 328 0 0 6229-GENERAL SUPPLIES 0 95 0 50 50 0 50 50 50 50 6229-GENERAL SUPPLIES 94,920 0 0 6205-SUPPLIES 0 95 0 50 50 0 50 50 50 50 6205-SUPPLIES 129,912 0 0 6231-LEGAL SERVICES 377 0 4,365 0 6235-CONSULTANT SERVICES 50,000 52,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6235-CONSULTANT SERVICES 719 0 18,204 6237-TELEPHONE/PAGERS 852 854 64 910 910 0 910 0 910 0 6239-PRINTING 6,873 0 0 6240-CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE 24,445 16,430 15,076 19,480 20,480 6,203 20,480 20,480 20,480 20,480 6240-CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE 240 0 0 6249-OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 59,312 14,789 17,839 13,160 13,160 6,344 13,160 13,160 13,160 13,160 6249-OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,440 0 0 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 134,986 84,572 37,344 33,550 34,550 12,547 34,550 33,640 34,550 33,640 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 10,272 0 18,204 6255-UTILITIES-ELECTRIC 13,955 11,722 11,297 15,000 15,000 8,519 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 6256-UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS 5,388 4,128 5,534 6,000 6,000 5,161 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6257-UTILITIES-PROPANE/WATER/SEWER 1,038 1,176 975 1,000 1,000 217 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6250-UTILITIES 20,381 17,026 17,806 22,000 22,000 13,897 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 6265-REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 150 668 241 370 370 2,278 370 370 370 370 6265-REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 8,535 0 0 6266-REPAIRS-BUILDING 36,468 7,626 13,645 19,080 19,080 16,685 19,080 19,080 19,080 19,080 6266-REPAIRS-BUILDING 221,298 0 0 6260-REPAIRS AND MAINTENA 36,618 8,294 13,887 19,450 19,450 18,963 19,450 19,450 19,450 19,450 6260-REPAIRS AND MAINTENA 229,833 0 0 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 191,984 109,987 69,037 75,050 76,050 45,407 76,050 75,140 76,050 75,140 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 370,017 0 18,204 6311-INSURANCE-PROPERTY/LIABILITY 6,945 6,290 6,500 6,500 8,000 3,333 8,200 8,200 8,200 8,200 6333-GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS -223 0 0 6349-LATE FEES/FINANCE CHARGES 1 0 6399-OTHER CHARGES 0 1,082 0 0 0 0 6399-OTHER CHARGES 37,768 0 0 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES 6,945 7,372 6,501 6,500 8,000 3,333 8,200 8,200 8,200 8,200 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES 37,545 0 0 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES 6,945 7,372 6,501 6,500 8,000 3,333 8,200 8,200 8,200 8,200 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES 37,545 0 0 6410-GOLF-RENT POWER CARTS 2,700 0 0 6401-EXPENDITURES 2,700 0 0 6400-TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,700 0 0 6715-CAPITAL OUTLAY-BUILDINGS 14,636 0 6720-CAPITAL OUTLAY-FURNITURE&FIX 44,051 0 0 6725-CAPITAL OUTLAY-OFFICE EQUIP 176,143 0 0 6735-CAPITAL OUTLAY-OTHER IMPROVEME 0 7,400 0 0 0 78,742 City of Apple Valley 297 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) EDUCATION BUILDING FUND 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6735-CAPITAL OUTLAY-OTHER IMPROVEME 32,064 6740-CAPITAL OUTLAY-MACH/EQ/OTHER 2,887 1,000 0 42,000 30,000 0 45,000 45,000 15,000 15,000 6740-CAPITAL OUTLAY-MACH/EQ/OTHER 10,664 0 0 6701-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 2,887 8,400 14,636 42,000 30,000 78,742 45,000 45,000 15,000 15,000 6701-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 230,858 0 32,064 6700-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 2,887 8,400 14,636 42,000 30,000 78,742 45,000 45,000 15,000 15,000 6700-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 230,858 0 32,064 6810-CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS 5,142 0 0 6801-TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS 0 0 0 0 6801-TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS 5,142 0 0 6800-TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS 0 0 0 0 6800-TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS 5,142 0 0 201,816 772,021 90,174 123,550 114,050 177,751 129,250 128,340 99,250 98,340 298 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 80: EDUCATION BUILDING FUND COMPANY 2090:EDUCATION BUILDING FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROPOSED RECOMMEND PROPOSED RECOMMEND Revenues 5199 Rents 2,500 2,000 2,000 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 5010 Investment Earnings _ 155,000 153,880 153,880 157,000 157,000 160,000 160,000 157,500 155,880 155,880 158,500 158,500 161,500 161,500 6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50 50 50 50 50 50 Total 50 50 - 50 50 50 50 6237 TELEPHONE Phone _ 910 910 - 910 - 910 - Total 910 910 - 910 - 910 - 6240 C.SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVAL Cleaning 18,000 19,000 13,200 19,000 19,000 19,000 19,000 Trash Service 1,480 1,480 1,800 1,480 1,480 1,480 1,480 Total 19,480 20,480 15,000 20,480 20,480 20,480 20,480 6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES I Pest Control 1,700 1,700 540 1,700 1,700 1,700 1,700 Mowing 4,990 4,990 5,000 4,990 4,990 4,990 4,990 Snow removal 6,470 6,470 6,500 6,470 6,470 6,470 6,470 Irrigation 1,750 Total 13,160 13,160 13,790 13,160 13,160 13,160 13,160 6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC Electric 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Total 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS Natural Gas 6,000 6,000 9,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 Total 6,000 6,000 9,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 I6257 UTILITIES-OTHER Water and Sewer 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Total 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT Fire Sprinkler testing 370 370 370 370 370 370 370 Total 370 370 370 370 370 370 370 6266 REPAIRS-BUILDINGS Roof Repairs 1,280 1,280 - 1,280 1,280 1,280 1,280 Plumbling 740 740 - 740 740 740 740 Misc Repairs 420 420 9,625 420 420 420 420 HVAC/Boiler Maintenance Agmt 14,010 14,010 11,000 14,010 14,010 14,010 14,010 HVAC/Boiler repairs 2,630 2,630 2,630 2,630 2,630 2,630 Total 19,080 19,080 20,625 19,080 19,080 19,080 19,080 6311 INSURANCE Property Insurance 6,500 8,000 8,000 8,200 8,200 8,200 8,200 Total 6,500 8,000 8,000 8,200 8,200 8,200 8,200 6740 CAPITAL OUTLAY-OTHER ITEMS HVAC 30,000 80,000 Roof/Gutters 12,000 30,000 30,000 City Share/Tenant 20,000 30,000 Painting/Siding 10,000 10,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Total 42,000 30,000 120,000 45,000 45,000 15,000 15,000 Total Net of Personnel 123,550 114,050 202,785 129,250 128,340 99,250 98,340 TOTAL EXPENSES $ 123,550 $ 114,050 $ 202,785 $ 129,250 $ 128,340 $ 99,250 $ 98,340 299 COMPANY DEPARTMENT BUSINESS UNIT ACTIVITY 7400 105 7400's Vehicle & Equipment Replacement Fund DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY The Vehicle and Equipment Replacement Fund (VERF) is being created to provide a financing mechanism for the systematic replacement of vehicles in the City's Fleet. The goal of the fund is to have sufficient cash flow to fund annual equipment purchases without the need to borrow and to stabilize budgeting for major equipment purchases. The goal is to accumulate funds but it is not planned to have all the resources to fund 100% of the replacement value of the entire fleet at any one time. The revenue source for the fund includes an annual inter-fund charge for vehicles and equipment in the program, proceeds from trade-ins and equipment sales for those items covered by the program, into the addition to interest earnings. SCOPE The Vehicle and Equipment Replacement Fund will apply to vehicles and equipment used by operations accounted for as a governmental fund (i.e. it does not include enterprise funds). How the VERF Works The VERF serves as a financing mechanism and each department is responsible for the management of their departments VERF account. • Vehicles and Equipment not included in the VERF program are not to be replaced through the use of VERF funds. • The initial funding of the VERF came from a combination of the existing equipment fund and the Closed GO bond Fund. • A separate account will be used to maintain a balance by department area for the participating departments; Code Enforcement/Community Development, Building Inspections, Engineering, Police, and Fire, Park Maintenance and Street Maintenance. • Replacements are limited to replacement of same kind of equipment, additional costs for upgrades and additional features beyond the replacement equipment are funded by the operating department within the operating budget. If equipment to outfit a vehicle is intended to be funded through the use of the VERF, the cost for the outing should be included in the estimated replacement cost. • The annual charge is calculated each year and is equal to the estimated replacement cost divided by the replacement cycle of the vehicle. • The VERF is designed to fund replacements of the vehicle/equipment- not the initial purchase for fleet additions. • Additions to the fleet are intended to be funded in the operating department's budget, and once purchased the assets are transferred to the VERF. 300 Budget Process • The VERF along with the listing of covered vehicles will be included in the annual Capital Improvements Program as well included in the annual operating budget as an internal service fund. • The vehicles included in the program will be scheduled based on the City Council adopted vehicle replacement schedule. Replacements each year will be based on recommendations provided to the Fleet Manager from each operating department. Each year's vehicle and equipment replacements are subject to the annual budgeting process for inclusion in the City Administrator's recommended budget and will be included as a separate section of the annual Capital Improvements Program. • The VERF annual budget will include a calculation of the annual charge for each vehicle in the program to be included in each department's operating budget. • The assets and subsequent depreciation are recorded in the VERF-Internal Service Fund. • A minimum reserve level in the VERF fund is to be maintained at a minimum level where the 10 year projected balance remains positive at each year. In the event that reserve levels are projected to fall below this minimum the annual charge will be adjusted to address the projected shortfall. MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2023 and 2024 The identified replacements that are proposed to be funded from the equipment fund are listed below. Summary Budget Department 105 Vehicle and Equipment Replacement Fund 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Revenue: 4225 VERF Interfund Charges $1,049,410 $ 1,152,820 $ 1,388,000 $ 1,345,500 $ 1,438,580 $ 1,647,260 $ 1,708,750 8205 Sale Proceeds 94,211 101,986 154,709 80,300 178,500 162,000 169,500 5010 Investment Earnings 47,948 36,652 (10,829) 20,640 17,660 18,690 22,630 5499 Trf from Closed GO Debt Fund 31,400 - - - - - - 1,222,969 1,291,458 1,531,880 1,446,440 1,634,740 1,827,950 1,900,880 Expenses Depreciation 1,021,811 1,137,225 1,219,136 1,042,700 1,169,500 1,360,360 1,376,160 Capital outlay: Code Enforcement-7412 - - 31,800 - - General Government-7412 - - 27,100 - - Police-7402 418,379 414,928 286,036 258,900 163,900 119,800 359,500 Fire-7407 659,080 348,757 210,452 58,200 1,463,600 32,300 625,700 Inspections-7417 - 15,653 - - - 26,300 35,000 Public Works-7427 - - - - - 26,300 - Park Maintenance-7432 120,061 316,668 300,203 289,600 51,300 283,900 313,400 Street Maintenance-7442 14,138 491,184 54,470 140,300 680,800 624,000 430,200 Engineering-7422 - - - - 22,600 25,600 - CMF Shop-7437 11,478 35,068 - - 27,100 - - Valleywood-7447 - - - - - 135,800 139,415 Total Capital outlay 1,223,136 1,622,258 851,161 747,000 2,468,200 1,274,000 1,903,215 Total 2,244,947 2,759,483 2,070,297 1,789,700 3,637,700 2,634,360 3,279,375 Cash Balance Beginning of Year $ 1,462,132 $ 1,461,965 $ 1,131,165 $ 1,131,165 $ 1,830,605 $ 997,145 $ 1,551,095 Revenues 1,222,969 1,291,458 1,531,880 1,446,440 1,634,740 1,827,950 1,900,880 Capital Outlay (1,223,136) (1,622,258) (851,161) (747,000) (2,468,200) (1,274,000) (1,903,215) End of Year $ 1,461,965 $ 1,131,165 $ 1,811,884 $ 1,830,605 $ 997,145 $ 1,551,095 $ 1,548,760 301 Capital Outlay: 2D23: p Y Life Acq Year Original Purchase Replace Unit Desc Cycle Date Added Price Price Trade Value Cost Police 901 2018 Ford Explorer 5 May-18 2018 32,550 49,100 4,000 45,100 948#2015 Ford Police Interceptor(invest.) 8 Nov-14 2015 31,100 48,200 3,000 45,200 800 Mhz Radios 2008 22,500 - 22,500 119,800 7,000 112,800 Fire 4991 2012 Chev Colorado Pickup 10 Apr-13 2013 36,046 32,300 4,000 28,300 32,300 4,000 28,300 Engineering 115 2013 GMC 54 Ton Pickup(4-WD) 10 Jan-13 2013 21,400 25,600 7,000 18,600 25,600 7,000 18,600 Street Maintenance 305 2012 Mack Dump Truck GU812(Single Axle) 12 Sep-11 2011 179,802 240,000 35,000 205,000 322 2010 Mack Dump Truck GU812(Single Axle) 12 Oct-10 2010 179,444 240,000 35,000 205,000 331 2013 Chev%Ton Ext.Cab Pickup(4-WD) 10 Apr-13 2013 27,248 45,000 9,000 36,000 341 2013 Chev%.Ton Ext.Cab Pickup(4-WD) 10 Apr-13 2013 27,248 45,000 9,000 36,000 346 2014 Toolcat 5600(annual buyback program) 10 Mar-14 2014 52,333 10,000 - 10,000 347 2017 Toolcat 5600(annual buyback program) 10 Oct-17 2017 62,500 10,000 - 10,000 321 1998 Daewoo Forklift 25 Jan-98 1998 3,000 34,000 3,000 31,000 624,000 91,000 533,000 Building Inspections 101 2013 Chev%Ton Pickup(4-WD) 10 Apr-13 2013 19,000 26,300 7,000 19,300 26,300 7,000 19,300 Natural Resources 601 2013 Chev%Ton Pickup(4-WD) 10 Apr-13 2013 20,750 26,300 7,000 19,300 26,300 7,000 19,300 Valleywood 533 Rough Cut-Toro Groundsmaster 4700D(leased) 12 2019 78,426 18,029 - 18,029 539 Triplex-Toro Reelmaster 3150Q(leased) 2019 40,700 9,356 - 9,356 538 Ranger Picker-Cushman-Hauler(leased) 12 2021 10,500 2,245 - 2,245 EZ-Go Golf Carts(leased) 10 2021 294,250 29,370 - 29,370 506 Triplex-Toro Reelmaster 3150Q 12 2010 29,000 30,500 2,000 28,500 535 Aerifier-Ryan GA30 12 2018 20,000 36,800 1,000 35,800 581 Turbine Blower-Toro ProBlow 12 2010 6,000 9,500 1,000 8,500 135,800 4,000 131,800 Park Maintenance 231 2013 Ford F250%Ton Pickup 10 Apr-13 2013 19,000 37,900 7,000 30,900 2392008 Ford F350 Dump Trk(4WD) 15 Mar-08 23008 35,000 61,500 10,000 51,500 244 2016 Toro GM 4700-0 7 May-16 2016 71,396 75,000 10,000 65,000 204 2011 JD 6230 Tractor 12 Jun-11 2011 40,153 41,000 4,500 36,500 252 2016 Toro Workman 7 Jan-16 2016 24,700 26,500 1,500 25,000 253 2011 Kaw 4x4 Mule 3010&80 Gal.Field Liner 6 Jul-11 2011 15,000 24,600 1,500 23,100 286 2003 Bannerman BTD-20 Turf Topdresser 20 Nov-03 2003 14,537 17,400 500 16,900 283,900 35,000 248,900 1,274,000 162,000 1,112,000 2024: Life Acq Year Original Purchase Replace Unit Desc Cycle Date Added Price Price Trade Value Cost Police 909 2015 Ford Explorer 4 Jun-15 2016 37,000 50,300 4,000 46,300 911 2018 Ford Explorer 5 2019 24,238 50,300 3,500 46,800 920 2019 Ford Explorer(K-9) 5 2019 24,216 56,700 4,000 52,700 922 2017 Ford Explorer(K-9) 6 2018 31,100 56,700 3,500 53,200 946**2020 Ford Explorer(admin.) 8 31,100 49,400 3,500 45,900 960 2011 GMC 1/2 Ton 4-WD Pickup(old CSO) 13 Mar-11 2011 24,500 36,800 5,000 31,800 963 2016 GMC 1/2 Ton 4-WD Pickup(CSO) 8 Feb-16 2016 27,246 36,800 5,000 31,800 800 Mhz Radios 2008 22,500 - 22,500 359,500 28,500 331,000 Fire 4976 2014 Ford Explorer 48,900 4,000 44,900 4981 2003 Spartan Fire Pumper 1250 GPM/500gal. 576,800 40,000 536,800 625,700 44,000 581,700 Street Maintenance 301 2011 Mack Dump Truck GU812(Single Axle) 12 Sep-11 2011 179,802 250,000 35,000 215,000 337 2015 Chev%Ton Pickup(4-WD) 10 Oct-14 2014 34,082 45,000 7,000 38,000 346 2014 Toolcat 5600(annual buyback program) 2023 10,000 10,000 - 10,000 347 2017 Toolcat 5600(annual buyback program) 2023 10,000 10,000 - 10,000 302 1994 Model XA59050 Compressor 25 Jan-94 1994 11,000 19,400 2,000 17,400 354 2008 Dura Patch 125D11 15 Jan-08 2008 52,000 95,800 5,000 90,800 430,200 49,000 381,200 Building Inspections 107 2014 GMC 3',Ton Pickup(4 WD) 10 May-14 2014 22,670 35,000 7,000 28,000 35,000 7,000 28,000 Valleywood 538 Ranger Picker-Cushman-Hauler(leased) 12 2021 10,500 2,245 - 2,245 EZ-Go Golf Carts(leased)-w/$55,000 buyout 10 2021 294,250 84,370 - 84,370 514 John Deere Tractor 40 1974 12,000 52,800 1,000 51,800 139,415 1,000 138,415 Park Maintenance 225 2014 Ford%Ton Quad Cab Pickup 10 Jun-16 2016 19,677 33,600 3,000 30,600 230 2014 Ford 1 Ton Drop Side Dump Truck(4-WD)9'Ur 10 Jun-14 2014 33,177 52,500 7,000 45,500 249 2014 Ford 1 Ton Drop Side Dump Truck(4-WD)9'Plc 10 Jun-14 2014 33,177 52,500 7,000 45,500 250 2014 Ford 1 Ton Drop Side Dump Truck(4-WD)9'Ur 10 Jun-14 2014 33,177 52,500 7,000 45,500 211 2018 Toro Grounds Master 6 Jan-18 2018 91,351 96,000 14,500 81,500 2592017 Toro Workman HDX-diesel 7 Jun-10 2017 27,620 26,300 1,500 24,800 313,400 40,000 273,400 1,903,215 169,500 1,733,715 302 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 105-VERF COMPANY 7400-VEHICLE&EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND-INTERNAL SERVICE FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL PROJECTED DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED REQUEST RECOMMEND REQUEST RECOMMEND REVENUES 4225 VERF CHARGES FROM: POLICE-7401 288,200 296,800 296,800 304,200 304,200 311,810 311,810 FIRE-7406 407,800 418,000 418,000 428,450 428,450 439,160 439,160 CODE ENFORCEMENT-7411 2,540 2,540 2,540 5,890 5,890 6,070 6,070 GEN GOVT BUILDINGS-7411 2,620 2,620 2,620 3,600 3,600 3,690 3,690 BLDG INSPECTIONS-7416 13,370 13,770 13,770 26,300 26,300 35,000 35,000 ENGINEERING-7421 10,770 11,040 11,040 11,320 11,320 11,600 11,600 PUBLIC WORKS-7426 2,050 2,100 2,100 2,150 2,150 2,200 2,200 PARK MAINT-7431 270,620 254,800 254,800 264,400 264,400 281,010 281,010 CMF SHOP-7436 7,130 8,910 8,910 10,250 10,250 14,290 14,290 STREET MAINT-7441 340,400 428,000 428,000 440,700 440,700 453,920 453,920 VALLEYWOOD-7446 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 Total 1,345,500 1,438,580 1,588,580 1,647,260 1,647,260 1,708,750 1,708,750 5010 INTEREST POLICE-7401 147 975 - 3,310 3,310 6,230 6,230 FIRE-7406 11,254 6,975 - 3,230 3,230 4,915 4,915 CODE ENFORCEMENT-7411 165 260 - - - - 90 GEN GOVT BUILDINGS-7411 291 290 - - - - - BLDG INSPECTIONS-7416 31 1,115 - 1,335 1,335 1,280 1,280 ENGINEERING-7421 237 800 - 575 575 475 475 PUBLIC WORKS-7426 214 630 - 670 670 425 425 PARK MAINT-7431 4,069 1,730 - 7,250 7,250 7,590 7,590 CMF SHOP-7436 350 490 - 50 50 205 205 STREETMAINT-7441 3,882 4,395 - 2,270 2,270 1,145 1,145 VALLEYWOOD-7446 - - - 275 275 Total 72,989 55,040 37,380 59,920 18,690 22,540 22,630 6610 DEPRECIATION POLICE-7402 161,000 235,000 235,000 280,260 280,260 280,260 280,260 FIRE-7407 194,000 220,000 220,000 270,000 270,000 270,000 270,000 CODE ENFORCEMENT-7412 5,400 5,400 5,400 5,400 5,400 5,400 5,400 GEN GOVT BUILDINGS-7412 BLDG INSPECTIONS-7417 14,500 12,000 12,000 12,500 12,500 12,500 12,500 ENGINEERING-7422 9,100 7,000 7,000 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 PUBLIC WORKS-7427 2,100 2,100 2,100 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 PARK MAINT-7432 275,000 275,000 275,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 CMF SHOP-7437 9,600 7,000 7,000 7,500 7,500 7,300 7,300 STREET MAINT-7442 372,000 406,000 406,000 402,000 402,000 418,000 418,000 VALEYYWOOD-7447 - - 91,000 91,000 91,000 91,000 91,000 Total 1,042,700 1,169,500 1,260,500 1,360,360 1,360,360 1,376,160 1,376,160 6730 CAPITAL OUTLAY-VEHICLES POLICE-7402 258,900 163,900 163,900 119,800 119,800 359,500 359,500 FIRE-7407 58,200 1,463,600 1,463,600 32,300 32,300 625,700 625,700 CODE ENFORCEMENT-7412 - 31,800 31,800 - - - - GEN GOVT BUILDINGS-7412 27,100 27,100 - - - - BLDG INSPECTIONS-7417 - 26,300 26,300 35,000 35,000 ENGINEERING-7422 - 22,600 22,600 25,600 25,600 - - PUBLIC WORKS-7427 - 26,300 26,300 - - PARK MAINT-7432 289,600 51,300 51,300 283,900 283,900 313,400 313,400 CMF SHOP-7437 - 27,100 27,100 - - - - STREET MAINT-7442 140,300 680,800 680,800 624,000 624,000 430,200 430,200 VALEYYWOOD-7447 - - 193,365 135,800 135,800 139,415 139,415 Total 747,000 2,468,200 2,661,565 1,274,000 1,274,000 1,903,215 1,903,215 TOTAL EXPENSES $ 1,789,700 $ 3,637,700 $ 3,922,065 $ 2,634,360 $ 2,634,360 $ 3,279,375 $ 3,279,375 303 COMPANY DEPARTMENT BUSINESS UNIT ACTIVITY 4000 71 4002 Municipal Building Fund DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY With this 2023 Budget, two new funds are being created, the Parks Facilities and the Fire Facilities Fund. The previously identified projects related to the Park Facilities and Fire Facilities are now included in these new separate funds. The Municipal Building Fund now currently includes the Municipal Center / Police Department. The Municipal Building Fund was created to provide a financing mechanism for the systematic improvements of municipal buildings and facilities. The goal of the fund is to have sufficient cash flow to fund annual purchases and to stabilize budgeting for these building improvement expenditures. The revenue source for the fund includes an annual transfer from the General Fund and transfers from the Future Capital Project Fund. As the program is phased in, an inventory of long term building needs will be incorporated into the Capital Improvements Plan in order to prioritize these identified needs. SCOPE The Municipal Building Fund will be used for the Municipal Center building and facility needs that extend the useful life of the building and facility and is not intended to address ongoing maintenance items which will continue to be addressed in the individual operating budgets. MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2023 and 2024 The identified replacements that are proposed to be funded from the municipal building fund are listed below under capital outlay. Summary Budget Department 71 -Municipal Building Fund 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Adopted# Proposed Proposed Revenue: Transfer From General Fund $ 214,000 $ 394,000 $ 192,000 $ 198,000 $ 75,000 $ 65,000 150,000 Transfer from Future Cap.Proj.Fund 212,000 800,000 212,000 218,000 - - - Investment Earnings 25,315 26,553 8,300 8,800 5,500 2,900 - Refunds and Reimbursements 77,238 - - - 528,553 1,220,553 412,300 424,800 80,500 67,900 150,000 Expenses 6229-General Supplies - - 3,492 - - - - 6266-Repairs Building - - 10,996 - - - - 6715-Buildings 359,423 334,834 540,213 966,000 250,000 261,000 150,000 6810-Construction in Progress 144,407 683,509 - - - - - Total 503,830 1,018,344 554,701 966,000 250,000 261,000 150,000 Fund Balance Beginning of Year# $ 832,144 $ 856,867 $ 1,059,076 $ 1,059,076 $ 364,000 $ 194,500 $ 1,400 Revenues 528,553 1,220,553 412,300 424,800 80,500 67,900 150,000 Expenses (503,830) (1,018,344) (554,701) (966,000) (250,000) (261,000) (150,000) Addback Depreciation Exp - - - - - - - EndofYear $ 856,867 $ 1,059,076 $ 916,675 $ 517,876 $ 194,500 $ 1,400 $ 1,400 Note#-the 2022 Budget, and Beginning Balance has been restated to split the prior fund balance and budget into the two new funds; the Fire Facilities and Park Facilities Funds. 304 Capital Outlay: 2022 Municipal Center— Re-carpet phase 1 $ 175,000 Municipal Center— Security Access Projects 25,000 Municipal Center—Victaulic Boiler Piping / fittings 50,000 $ 250,000 2023 Municipal Center— Re-carpet phase 2 $ 175,000 Municipal Center PD Training Room 56,000 CMF Small HVAC units 30,000 $261,000 2024 Municipal Center— Roof Replacement $ 150,000 $ 150,000 City of Apple Valley 305 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) MUNICIPAL BUILDINGS 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6229-GENERAL SUPPLIES 3,492 0 6205-SUPPLIES 3,492 0 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0 0 0 0 6266-REPAIRS-BUILDING 0 0 10,996 0 6260-REPAIRS AND MAINTENA 0 0 10,996 0 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 0 0 14,488 0 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 6715-CAPITAL OUTLAY-BUILDINGS 106,090 130,161 483,830 966,000 346,000 177,669 261,000 261,000 150,000 150,000 6720-CAPITAL OUTLAY-FURNITURE&FIX 0 3,652 0 0 6735-CAPITAL OUTLAY-OTHER IMPROVEME 19,171 26,990 56,383 0 0 0 6740-CAPITAL OUTLAY-MACH/EQ/OTHER 234,162 174,031 0 0 0 0 6701-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 359,423 334,834 540,213 966,000 346,000 177,669 261,000 261,000 150,000 150,000 6700-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 359,423 334,834 540,213 966,000 346,000 177,669 261,000 261,000 150,000 150,000 6810-CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS 144,407 683,509 0 0 6801-TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS 144,407 683,509 0 0 6800-TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS 144,407 683,509 0 0 7001-TOTAL INTEREST AND FISCAL FEES 0 0 0 0 7000-TOTAL INTEREST AND FISCAL FEES 0 0 0 0 503,829 1,018,344 554,701 966,000 346,000 177,669 261,000 261,000 150,000 150,000 306 Financial Analysis: Muncipal Building Fund 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of Funds Investment Earnings $ 5,500 $ 2,900 $ - $ - $ - Transfer from General Fund(Levy)/Future Capital Projects Fur 75,000 65,000 150,000 150,000 300,000 Other Funds - - - - Total Source of Funds $ 80,500 $ 67,900 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 300,000 Use of Funds City Hall Municipal Center-PD Training room area conversion - 56,000 Municipal Center-Recarpet 175,000 175,000 Municipal Center-Security Access Projects 25,000 Municipal Center-Municipal Center Roof replacement - - 150,000 150,000 Municipal Center-Reseal aluminum window frames 16,000 Municipal Center-Replace utility set exhaust fan 8,000 Municipal Center-Replace Server Room Flooring 5,000 Municipal Center-Victaulic Boiler Piping/fittings 50,000 $ 250,000 $ 231,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 29,000 Public Works CMF Small HVAC Units - 30,000 $ - $ 30,000 $ - $ - $ - Total Use of Funds $ 250,000 $ 261,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 29,000 Net Change $ (169,500) $ (193,100) $ - $ - $ 271,000 Beginning Cash/Fund Balance $ 364,000 $ 194,500 $ 1,400 $ 1,400 $ 1,400 Ending Cash/Fund Balance $ 194,500 $ 1,400 $ 1,400 $ 1,400 $ 272,400 307 COMPANY DEPARTMENT BUSINESS UNIT ACTIVITY 4825 xx 4827 Fire Facilities Fund DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY The Fire Facilities Fund accounts for significant capital improvements pertaining to the Fire Station buildings The Fire Facilities Fund is a new fund created to provide a financing mechanism for the systematic building improvements to Fire Department facilities. Based on existing conservative funding estimates, the fund balance will maintain a nominal positive fund balance over the next five years. With the upcoming reconstruction of Fire Station number 2 the other capital needs for other fire facilities over the next five years are not great, but developing the separate fund with an ongoing revenue source will enable the fund to accumulate funds to address improvements at the stations on a consistent basis. The goal of the fund is to have sufficient cash flow to fund annual purchases and to stabilize budgeting for these building improvement expenditures. The revenue source for the fund includes an annual transfer from the General Fund and a transfer from the Future Capital Project Fund in an amount equal to the prior year's interest earnings experienced in the Future Capital Projects Fund, in the addition to interest earnings. As the program is phased in, an inventory of long term building needs will be incorporated into the Capital Improvements Plan in order to prioritize these identified needs. SCOPE The Fire Facilities Fund will be used for building and facility needs that extend the useful life of the building and facility and is not intended to address ongoing maintenance items which will continue to be addressed in the individual operating budgets. MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2023 and 2024 The identified replacements that are proposed to be funded from the Fire Facilities Fund are listed below under capital outlay. 308 Summary Budget Department -Fire Facilities Fund 2019 2020 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Actual Adopted Adopted Proposed-# Proposed Proposed Revenue: Transfer From General Fund-# $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 30,000 40,000 Transfer from Future Cap.Proj.Fund - - - - - - - Transfer from other Funds - - - - - - - Investment Earnings - - - - 400 400 300 - - - - 50,400 30,400 40,300 Expenses 6715-Buildings - - - - 50,000 35,000 - Total - - - - 50,000 35,000 - Fund Balance Beginning of Year $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 25,000 $ 25,400 $ 20,800 Revenues - - - - 50,400 30,400 40,300 Expenses - - - - (50,000) (35,000) - Addback Depreciation Exp - - - - - - - End of Year $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 25,400 $ 20,800 $ 61,100 Note#-the 2022 Budget, and Beginning Balance has been restated to split the prior fund balance and budget into the two new funds; the Fire Facilities and Park Facilities Funds. Capital Outlay: 2022 2022 Fire Station 3 HVAC Replacement 50,000 $ 50,000 2023 2023 Fire Station 3 Temperature Controls 35,000 $ 35,000 2024 2024 None -0- $ -0- 309 City of Apple Valley Department Expense Summary Budget Years(2023-2024) 4825-FIRE FACILITIES FUND 2021 Council 2022 Council 2024 Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept Adm n 2024 Dept Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Proposed Budget Budget Recommend Recommend 6229-GENERAL SUPPLIES - - - - - - - - - - 6205-SUPPLIES - - - - - - - - - - 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES - - - - - - - - - - 6266-REPAIRS-BUILDING - - - - - - - - - - 6260-REPAIRS AND MAINTENA - - - - - - - - - - 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS - - - - - - - - - - 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES - - - - - - - - - - 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES - - - - - - - - - - 6715-CAPITAL OUTLAY-BUILDINGS - - - - - - 35,000 35,000 0 0 6701-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY - - - - - - 35,000 35,000 0 0 6700-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY - - - - - - 35,000 35,000 0 0 6810-CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS - - - - - - - - - - 6801-TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS - - - - - - - - - - 6800-TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS - - - - - - - - - - 7001-TOTAL INTEREST AND FISCAL FEES - - - - - - - - - - 7000-TOTAL INTEREST AND FISCAL FEES - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 35,000 35,000 0 0 310 Financial Analysis: Fire Facilities Maint. Fund 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of Funds Investment Earnings $ 400 $ 400 $ 300 $ 900 $ 900 Tax Levy Transfer from General Fund(Levy)/Future Capital Projects Fu 50,000 30,000 40,000 100,000 100,000 Transfer from General Fund Other Funds - - - - Total Source of Funds $ 50,400 $ 30,400 $ 40,300 $ 100,900 $ 100,900 Use of Funds Public Safety-Fire Fire Station 3 HVAC Replacement 50,000 Fire Station 1 -Alina HVAC Unit - 10,000 Fire Station 1-HVAC Roof Top Unit 10,000 Fire Station 1 Radiant Bay Heaters 33,000 Fire Station 1 -Generator Replacement 60,000 Fire Station 3 Temp Controls 35,000 Fire Station 1 Temp Controls - 35,000 $ 50,000 $ 35,000 $ - $ 103,000 $ 45,000 Total Use of Funds $ 50,000 $ 35,000 $ - $ 103,000 $ 45,000 Net Change $ 400 $ (4,600) $ 40,300 $ (2,100) $ 55,900 Beginning Cash/Fund Balance $ 25,000 $ 25,400 $ 20,800 $ 61,100 $ 59,000 Ending Cash/Fund Balance $ 25,400 $ 20,800 $ 61,100 $ 59,000 $ 114,900 311 COMPANY DEPARTMENT BUSINESS UNIT ACTIVITY 4820 xx 4822 Park Facilities Fund DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY The Park Facilities Fund accounts for significant capital improvements pertaining to the Park System. The Park Facilities Fund is a new fund created to provide a financing mechanism for the systematic building improvements to park facilities. This approach differs from budgeting for individual projects in individual operating budgets which are subject to large swings in expenditures from year to year. This provides a more stable budgeting approach without the annual volatility in the individual department budgets. The goal of the fund is to have sufficient cash flow to fund annual purchases and to stabilize budgeting for these building improvement expenditures. The Fund receives its revenues from transfers from the General Fund, and the transfer amounts are determined during the annual budget process. With the timing of a potential park referendum, some of these projects identified may be included in the referendum. SCOPE The Park Facilities Fund is used for building and facility needs that extend the useful life of the building and facilities and is not intended to address ongoing maintenance items which will continue to be addressed in the individual operating budgets. The Fund covers the projected and budgeted building improvements for Park Facilities. Because of significant backlogs in park system replacements it will take time for the funding to reach levels that will address replacement needs on an ongoing basis. MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2023 and 2024 The identified replacements that are proposed to be funded from the Park Facilities Fund are listed below under capital outlay. Summary Budget Department -Park Facilities Fund 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Revenue: Transfer From General Fund $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 79,000 $ 286,000 355,000 Transfer from Future Cap.Proj.Fund - - - - 225,000 125,000 195,000 Transfer from other Funds - - - - - - - Investment Earnings - - - - 4,500 6,600 8,900 - 308,500 417,600 558,900 Expenses 6735-Other Improvements: Community Center - - - - 125,000 27,000 430,000 Senior Center - - - - 46,000 102,500 7,000 Aquatic Center - - - 50,000 315,000 Johnny Cake Ridge Park - - - - - 75,000 50,000 Parks&Open Space,Playgrounds - - - - - - 125,000 Total - - - - 171,000 254,500 927,000 Fund Balance Beginning of Year $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ 437,500 $ 600,600 Revenues - - - - 308,500 417,600 558,900 Expenses - - - - (171,000) (254,500) (927,000) End of Year $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 437,500 $ 600,600 $ 232,500 Note#-the 2022 Budget, and Beginning Balance has been restated to split the prior fund balance and budget into the two new funds; the Fire Facilities and Park Facilities Funds. 312 Capital Outlay: 2022 2022 AVCC Concrete Work $ 75,000 AVCC - Entry Doors 50,000 Senior Center - Core Water Pipes 10,000 Senior Center- Flooring Kitchen 10,000 Senior Center - Garage Storage Roof Replacement 26,000 $ 171,000 2023 2023 AVCC Gym Ceiling Fans 27,000 Senior Center- Gutter Repair and Downspouts 20,000 Senior Center- Storage Shed 10,000 Senior Center Flooring Glacier, Library 15,000 Senior Center Flooring Restrooms 30,000 Senior Center Flooring Sequoia, Denali 20,000 Senior Center Ice Machine 7,500 AVFAC - Pump Replacement 50,000 JCRP East- Parking lot chip seal 75,000 $ 254,500 2024 2024 AVCC - Flooring $ 10,000 AVCC - Entry Doors 40,000 AVCC - Interior Doors 30,000 AVCC - Skylight Replacement 200,000 AVCC - Plumbing Fixtures 50,000 AVCC - Replace hydronic radiators 100,000 Senior Center Irrigation 7,000 AVFAC - Leisure Pool Bathhouse Flooring 20,000 AVFAC - Replace Waterslides 50,000 AVFAC - Replace Slide Pump 30,000 AVFAC - Replace 30hp Pumps 60,000 AVFAC - Repair Plaster Walls 5,000 AVFAC - Replace Plaster Decking 78,000 AVFAC - Replace Concrete Sidewalks 72,000 JCRPE - Replace Fencing 50,000 Overall Park Trails 100,000 Valley Middle - Backstop Replacement 25,000 $ 927,000 313 City of Apple Valley Department Expense Summary Budget Years(2023-2024) 4825-PARK FACILITIES FUND 2021 Council 2022 Council 2023 2024 Object Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2024 Dept Account 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Original Adopted YTD Actual Proposed Admin Proposed Admin Budget Original Recommend Recommend Rudaet 6229-GENERAL SUPPLIES - - - - - - - - - - 6205-SUPPLIES - - - - - - - - - - 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES - - - - - - - - - - 6266-REPAIRS-BUILDING - - - - - - - - - - 6260-REPAIRS AND MAINTENA - - - - - - - - - - 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS - - - - - - - - - - 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES - - - - - - - - - - 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES - - - - - - - - - - 6735-CAPITAL OUTLAY-OTHER IMP - - - - - - 362,500 254,500 1,713,500 927,000 6701-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY - - - - - - 362,500 254,500 1,713,500 927,000 6700-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY - - - - - - 362,500 254,500 1,713,500 927,000 6810-CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS - - - - - - - - - - 6801-TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS - - - - - - - - - - 6800-TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS - - - - - - - - - - 7001-TOTAL INTEREST AND FISCAL FEES - - - - - - - - - - 7000-TOTAL INTEREST AND FISCAL FEES - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 362,500 254,500 1,713,500 927,000 314 Park Facilities Maintenance Fund 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 2025 2026 Council Dept Admin. Dept Admin. Adopted Request Recommend Request Recommend Source of Funds Investment Earnings $ 4,500 $ 4,500 $ 6,600 $ 7,400 $ 8,900 $ 3,500 $ - Transfer from General Fund(Levy)/Future Capital Projects Fur 304,000 411,000 411,000 750,000 550,000 725,000 900,000 Total Source of Funds $ 308,500 $ 415,500 $ 417,600 $ 757,400 $ 558,900 $ 728,500 $ 900,000 Use of Funds Community Center-Concrete Work 75,000 Community Center-Flooring 10,000 10,000 Community Center-Entry Doors 50,000 40,000 40,000 Community Center-Interior Doors 30,000 30,000 Community Center-Basketball Backboards Replacement 8,000 Community Center-Maint.Equip.scrubbers/vacuums) 10,000 Community Center-Gym Ceiling Fans 27,000 27,000 Community Center-Skylight Replacement 200,000 200,000 Community Center-Repair Block Superstructure 34,100 Community Center-Replace Plumbing Fixtures 50,000 50,000 Community Center-Replace hydronic radiators 100,000 100,000 Community Center-Replace acoustical ceiling tiles 79,000 Community Center-Repair ext concrete block walls 19,100 Community Center-Repair ext deck block walls 19,100 Community Center-Repair ext precast panel walls 19,100 Community Center-Repair ext ceramic tile siding 19,100 Community Center-Repair and upgrade electrical service 23,000 Community Center-Repair branch wiring 29,000 Community Center-Repair concrete slab foundation 10,000 Community Center-Repair downspouts and scuppers 55,000 Community Center-Replace Restroom Partions 10,000 Community Center-Replace Interior Solid Core doors 166,400 Community Center-Replace interior metal doors 166,400 Total Community Center 125,000 45,000 27,000 430,000 430,000 306,500 342,800 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 2025 2026 Senior Center-Core Water pipes 10,000 Senior Center-Flooring Kitchen 10,000 Senior Center-gutter repair&downspouts 20,000 20,000 Senior Center-storage shed 10,000 10,000 Senior Center-Flooring Glacier,Library 15,000 15,000 Senior Center-Flooring Sequoia,Denali'23 20,000 20,000 Senior Center-Flooring Restrooms 30,000 30,000 Senior Center-Ice Machine Addition 7,500 7,500 Senior Center-Irrigation - - 7,000 7,000 Senior Center-Flooring 2nd Level 25,000 Senior Center-Water Softener Replacement(2) 15,000 Senior Center-Heat Pump 340,000 - 340000 Senior Center-Garage Storage Roof Replacement 26,000 - - - - Senior Center-Roof Replacement(shingle Roof) 100,000 Senior Center-Yellowstone Lighting Upgrades - - 15,000 Senior Center-Replace Accoustical Tiles 70,000 Senior Center-Replace Cooling Tower 35,000 Senior Center-Replace Water Softener 20,000 Total Senior Center 46,000 142,500 102,500 447,000 7,000 375,000 105,000 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 2025 2026 Aquatic Center-Lazy River Bathhouse Flooring 10,000 Aquatic Center-Pump equipment replacement 50,000 50,000 Aquatic Center-Concession Window Menu Screens 5,000 Aquatic Center-Shade Canopies 15,000 Aquatice Center-Walk-In Cooler 20,000 Aquatic Center-Leisure Pool Bathhouse Flooring 20,000 20,000 Aquatic Center-Replace Waterslides 50,000 50,000 Aquatic Center-Replace Slide Pump 30,000 30,000 Aquatic Center-Replace 30hp Pumps 60,000 60,000 Aquatic Center-Repair Plaster Walls 5,000 5,000 Aquatic Center-Replace Plaster Decking 78,000 78,000 Aquatic Center-Replace concession NC 15,000 Aquatic Center-Replace Concrete Sidewalks 72,000 72,000 Total Aquatic Center - 100,000 50,000 330,000 315,000 - JCRPE-parking lot chip seal 75,000 75,000 JCRPE&W-Backstop Replacements 84,000 JCRPW fence between soccer fields/Field 2 75,000 JCRPE-Replace fencing 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 JCRP east-Concession Exterior Doors 12,400 $ - $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 134,000 $ 50,000 $ 62,400 $ 125,000 315 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 2025 2026 Park Facilities Maintenance Fund(cont'd) 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 2025 2026 Parks and Open Space Overlay park trails 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Playground Sand Replacement 22,500 Play Structure Replacement 200,000 - 200,000 200,000 Valley Middle-backstop replacement 50,000 25,000 25,000 Total Parks and Open Space $ - $ - $ - $ 372,500 $ 125,000 $ 385,000 $ 300,000 Total Use of Funds $ 171,000 $ 362,500 $ 254,500 $ 1,713,500 $ 927,000 $ 1,128,900 $ 872,800 Net Change $ 137,500 $ 53,000 $ 163,100 $ (956,100) $ (368,100) $ (400,400) $ 27,200 Beginning Cash/Fund Balance $ 300,000 $ 437,500 $ 437,500 $ 490,500 $ 600,600 $ 232,500 $ (167,900) Ending Cash/Fund Balance $ 437,500 $ 490,500 $ 600,600 $ (465,600) $ 232,500 $ (167,900) $ (140,700) 316 ••• •••• ••••• ••• AppValley Notes: 317 COMPANY DEPARTMENT BUSINESS UNIT ACTIVITY 5000 56, 57, 58 and 59 5005, 5025, 5065 Liquor Operations 5095 DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY Liquor Operations exist in order to control the sale and consumption of alcoholic beverages in compliance with Federal and State laws. After control, we strive to provide the community the highest possible profit, and the best customer service in the area. MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2023/2024 • In order to provide shopping convenience and keep up with our competition, we will be offering our community a new website with a direct link to order our products on- line. We will develop a user-friendly Ecommerce site for our customers to shop from the convenience of their homes. They will then be able to pick their purchases up at the chosen location. A new website will help us better compete with our market. This professional retail-specific site will align more with what consumers are accustomed to when seeking information or shopping online. The website will help us better serve our customers with store announcements, such as tastings and sales events, and information about the history and purpose of our Liquor Department. These new tools will be easy to navigate, and be attractive and informative to our community. • With the addition of our new in-house wine specialist, we will be conducting quarterly staff wine education classes. Our plan is to utilize this wine specialist position to not only educate our staff, but also assist in educating the community with public tastings throughout the year. Through product knowledge training, our staff will keep current on information that will assist them in the highest quality customer service possible. IMPACT MEASURES / PERFORMANCE INDICATORS - UPDATE Actual Actual Actual Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Item 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 AV Gross Profit% 29.8% 29.0% 28.2% 28.6% 29.0% 29.0% 29.0% For comparison: Metro Average Gross Profit* 26.7% 26.8% AV Net Operating Profit% 12.7% 12.4% 11.2% 9.9% 10.4% 7.0% 6.8% (before transfers) Metro Avg. Net Op. Profit%* 7.14% 7.9% Sales 9,886,578 10,878,590 11,128,774 11,123,894 11,005,000 10,722,000 10,978,000 Transfer to General Fund 660,000 660,000 660,000 680,000 700,000 700,000 700,000 Transfer to Other Funds -0- -0- -0- -0- 150,000 150,000 150,000 *Numbers from the State Auditor's Report, not available after 2020 Regular Status Personnel Schedule FTE's Adopted Adoptec Adopted Proposed Proposed Proposed Position Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2023 Liquor Operation Director 1 1 1 1 1 1 Liquor Store Manager 3 3 3 3 3 3 Assistant Store Manager 2 2 2 3 3 3 318 Temporary Status Personnel Schedule-(#hours) Adopted Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Position Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Accounting Clerk PT 1300 1,300 1,300 1,350 1,350 1,350 Lead Clerk PT 6,650 6,100 6,100 7,000 7,000 7,000 Cashier/Clerks 15,700 14,400 16,900 17,300 17,300 17,300 Supervisor PT 1,200 2,100 2,300 3,000 3,000 3,000 Summary Budget Business Unit-Liquor Combined 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Sales Revenue 9,886,578 10,878,590 11,128,774 10,290,000 11,005,000 10,717,000 10,978,000 Cost of Goods Sold 6,935,517 7,726,223 7,993,502 7,344,200 7,813,550 7,609,070 7,794,380 Gross Profit 2,951,061 3,152,367 3,135,272 2,945,800 3,191,450 3,107,930 3,183,620 29.8% 29.0% 28.2% 28.6% 29.0% 29.0% 29.0% Expenditures Salaries and Wages 806,058 846,602 896,702 894,120 944,335 1,130,835 1,180,615 Employee Benefits 188,300 193,410 206,835 278,100 277,240 337,280 355,370 Supplies 17,900 14,209 17,495 21,650 21,650 21,800 21,500 Contractual Services 33,829 35,214 38,874 42,005 43,625 48,025 48,025 Utilities 48,835 52,503 53,924 52,380 55,080 57,550 57,650 Repairs and Maint. 23,113 45,153 21,684 43,568 43,568 43,570 43,570 Training/Travel/Dues 8,400 8,739 8,240 13,630 14,430 16,380 16,380 Rentals/Leases 187,761 188,810 189,324 191,600 197,600 197,600 197,600 Insurance 66,600 66,700 69,200 69,200 81,600 98,800 103,000 Other Expenditures 12,297 12,681 13,420 13,400 13,400 14,100 15,000 Visa M/C fees 157,682 192,830 220,461 164,000 206,000 245,000 255,000 Depreciation 140,773 150,234 151,561 144,800 147,100 151,000 151,000 Total Exp. 1,691,548 1,807,085 1,887,720 1,928,453 2,045,628 2,361,940 2,444,710 Operating Income-before Transfers &Interest 1,259,513 1,345,282 1,247,552 1,017,347 1,145,822 745,990 738,910 12.7% 12.4% 11.2% 9.9% 10.4% 7.0% 6.7% Other Revenue(expense) 6,293 1,245 4,968 - - - - Interest Income 69,094 98,758 (23,208) 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 Transfers Out (660,000) (660,000) (1,680,000) (680,000) (850,000) (850,000) (885,000) Debt Service Interest - - - - - - - Net Income 674,900 785,285 (450,688) 377,347 335,822 (64,010) (106,090) Net Position-Beginning of Year 5,875,911 6,550,811 7,336,097 7,336,097 6,885,409 7,221,231 7,157,221 Change in Accounting Principle - 0 - - - - 0 Net Position-End of Year 6,550,811 7,336,097 6,885,409 7,713,444 7,221,231 7,157,221 7,051,131 CAPITAL OUTLAY 2022: Store 2 two door reach-in cooler $ 8,000 2023: Store 3 Beer Cave shelving $15,000 2024: None City of Apple Valley 319 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) LIQUOR STORE MANAGEMENT 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6110-SALARY-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 157,904 108,204 115,367 110,410 116,040 68,254 181,345 181,345 193,590 193,590 6111-SALARY PART-TIME 23,892 27,425 28,434 20,750 28,160 13,743 30,645 30,645 31,565 31,565 6114-OVERTIME PART-TIME EMPLOYEES 131 0 0 0 6118-VACATION PAY -9,021 2,986 10,197 0 6119-ANNUAL LEAVE 466 6121-INSURANCE CASH BENEFIT 240 0 0 120 6123-SALARY-OTHER 6,215 6,700 11,095 11,095 10,855 10,855 6105-SALARIES AND WAGES 173,146 138,615 153,997 137,375 150,900 82,583 223,085 223,085 236,010 236,010 6138-MEDICARE 1,982 1,900 1,978 1,990 2,190 1,165 3,235 3,235 3,420 3,420 6139-FICA 8,477 8,122 8,457 8,515 9,355 4,982 13,830 13,830 14,635 14,635 6141-PENSIONS-PERA 9,813 10,172 10,721 10,305 11,315 6,116 16,730 16,730 17,700 17,700 6142-WORKERS COMPENSATION 4,530 2,460 951 5,465 1,000 1,015 3,775 3,775 4,215 4,215 6144-LONG-TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE 201 218 193 320 335 99 530 530 560 560 6145-MEDICAL INSURANCE 6,175 18,783 18,417 18,360 17,940 8,978 37,560 37,560 39,360 39,360 6146-DENTAL INSURANCE 552 604 722 975 6147-LIFE INSURANCE-BASIC 6 6 7 13 6148-LIFE INSURANCE-SUPP/DEPEND 692 0 0 114 6125-EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 32,427 42,264 41,444 44,955 42,135 23,456 75,660 75,660 79,890 79,890 6100-TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 205,573 180,879 195,441 182,330 193,035 106,038 298,745 298,745 315,900 315,900 6210-OFFICE SUPPLIES 0 61 1,423 100 100 0 200 200 200 200 6229-GENERAL SUPPLIES 513 391 418 50 50 68 100 100 100 100 6205-SUPPLIES 513 452 1,841 150 150 68 300 300 300 300 6235-CONSULTANT SERVICES 14,404 12,223 11,357 18,000 18,000 7,497 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 6239-PRINTING 6,986 4,510 11,245 12,000 12,000 3,868 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 21,390 16,733 22,602 30,000 30,000 11,365 31,000 31,000 31,000 31,000 6275-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL 20 0 0 200 200 0 200 200 200 200 6276-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP OTHER 0 0 0 2,500 2,500 1,518 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 6277-MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE 440 1,110 969 1,000 1,000 648 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 6280-DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 0 5,700 5,700 6,625 7,425 0 7,425 7,425 7,425 7,425 6281-UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 250 250 400 400 400 400 6270-TRNGITRAVL/DUES/UNIF 460 6,810 6,669 10,575 11,375 2,166 12,225 12,225 12,225 12,225 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 22,362 23,995 31,113 40,725 41,525 13,599 43,525 43,525 43,525 43,525 6399-OTHER CHARGES 12,082 12,681 13,447 13,400 13,400 8,312 14,100 14,100 15,000 15,000 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES 12,082 12,681 13,447 13,400 13,400 8,312 14,100 14,100 15,000 15,000 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES 12,082 12,681 13,447 13,400 13,400 8,312 14,100 14,100 15,000 15,000 6701-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 0 0 0 0 6700-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 0 0 0 0 7110-TRANSFER TO OTHER FUNDS 660,000 660,000 1,680,000 680,000 850,000 291,667 850,000 850,000 885,000 885,000 7101-TOTAL TRANSFERS 660,000 660,000 1,680,000 680,000 850,000 291,667 850,000 850,000 885,000 885,000 7100-TOTAL TRANSFERS 660,000 660,000 1,680,000 680,000 850,000 291,667 850,000 850,000 885,000 885,000 900,017 877,554 1,920,001 916,455 1,097,960 419,616 1,206,370 1,206,370 1,259,425 1,259,425 320 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 56: LIQUOR STORE MANAGEMENT-5005 COMPANY 5000: LIQUOR FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND SALARIES 6110 Regular Employees 110,410 116,040 165,365 181,345 181,345 193,590 193,590 6111 Salaries-Parttime 20,750 28,160 28,160 30,645 30,645 31,565 31,565 6123 Salaries-Other 6,215 6,700 6,700 11,095 11,095 10,855 10,855 6138 Medicare 1,990 2,190 2,900 3,235 3,235 3,420 3,420 6139 FICA 8,515 9,355 12,415 13,830 13,830 14,635 14,635 6141 Pension-PERA 10,305 11,315 15,020 16,730 16,730 17,700 17,700 6142 Workers Compensation 5,465 1,000 1,330 3,775 3,775 4,215 4,215 6144 Long-term Disability Insurance 320 335 470 530 530 560 560 6145 Hospital&Life Insurance 18,360 17,940 27,630 37,560 37,560 39,360 39,360 Total 182,330 193,035 259,990 298,745 298,745 315,900 315,900 6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES Miscellaneous 100 100 100 200 200 200 200 Total 100 100 100 200 200 200 200 6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES Various 50 50 50 100 100 100 100 Total 50 50 50 100 100 100 100 6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES Audit 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 PCI Compliance/Penetration Testing 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Total 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 6239 PRINTING/PUBLISHING/ADVERTISING Advertising,Help wanted,etc 12,000 12,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 Total 12,000 12,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 6275 SCHOOL/CONFIEXP-LOCAL Chamber Meetings 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Seminars 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 Total 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 6276 SCHOOL/CONF/EXP-OTHER MMBA conference 2,500 2,500 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 Total 2,500 2,500 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 6277 MILEAGE ALLOWANCE 1,000 1,000 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 Total 1,000 1,000 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 6280 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS MN Municipal Beverage Assn 5,700 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 Chamber Dues Council 925 925 925 925 925 925 925 Total 6,625 7,425 7,425 7,425 7,425 7,425 7,425 6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE Clothing 250 250 400 400 400 400 400 Total 250 250 400 400 400 400 400 6399 OTHER CHARGES LOG I S 13,400 13,400 13,400 14,100 14,100 15,000 15,000 Total 13,400 13,400 13,400 14,100 14,100 15,000 15,000 6720 CAPITAL OUTLAY-FURNITURE New Office Furniture Wine Specialist 5,000 Total - - 5,000 - - - - 7110 TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND Operating Transfer 680,000 850,000 850,000 850,000 850,000 885,000 885,000 Total 680,000 850,000 850,000 850,000 850,000 885,000 885,000 Total Net of Personnel 734,125 904,925 911,775 907,625 907,625 943,525 943,525 TOTAL EXPENSES $ 916,455 $ 1,097,960 $ 1,171,765 $ 1,206,370 $ 1,206,370 $ 1,259,425 $ 1,259,425 City of Apple Valley 321 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) LIQUOR STORE#1 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6110-SALARY-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 138,096 141,002 144,211 156,585 157,680 73,928 165,130 165,130 175,185 175,185 6111-SALARY PART-TIME 166 152 151,150 137,025 151,120 74,657 182,350 182,350 187,700 187,700 6112-SALARY-SEASONAL TEMP 122,625 130,344 0 0 6113-OVERTIME-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 447 963 1,326 2,100 2,100 667 2,100 2,100 2,100 2,100 6114-OVERTIME PART-TIME EMPLOYEES 0 0 0 5,100 5,100 0 5,100 5,100 5,100 5,100 6118-VACATION PAY -28,813 10,557 4,999 0 6121-INSURANCE CASH BENEFIT 480 0 0 0 6123-SALARY-OTHER 0 0 0 7,520 9,135 0 8,865 8,865 8,205 8,205 6124-OVERTIME-SEASONAL TEMP 2,613 3,160 80 0 6105-SALARIES AND WAGES 235,614 286,177 301,767 308,330 325,135 149,253 363,545 363,545 378,290 378,290 6138-MEDICARE 3,773 3,829 4,140 4,470 4,715 2,082 5,270 5,270 5,485 5,485 6139-FICA 16,133 16,291 17,701 19,115 20,160 8,904 22,540 22,540 23,455 23,455 6141-PENSIONS-PERA 19,714 20,667 21,495 23,125 24,385 11,019 27,265 27,265 28,370 28,370 6142-WORKERS COMPENSATION 10,436 11,498 13,555 14,150 14,150 6,551 15,820 15,820 17,290 17,290 6143-UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 348 0 0 0 6144-LONG-TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE 262 274 238 455 460 111 480 480 505 505 6145-MEDICAL INSURANCE 22,347 46,603 41,870 36,720 35,880 16,093 37,560 37,560 39,360 39,360 6146-DENTAL INSURANCE 2,128 2,551 2,351 1,430 6147-LIFE INSURANCE-BASIC 11 11 11 19 6148-LIFE INSURANCE-SUPP/DEPEND 88 0 0 0 6170-EMPLOYEE PAID PREMIUMS -3,849 -12,780 -11,516 -2,000 -2,168 -2,000 -2,000 -2,000 -2,000 6125-EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 71,391 88,945 89,846 98,035 97,750 44,040 106,935 106,935 112,465 112,465 6100-TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 307,005 375,122 391,612 406,365 422,885 193,293 470,480 470,480 490,755 490,755 6210-OFFICE SUPPLIES 115 80 160 400 400 911 400 400 400 400 6211-SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT 409 0 0 1,550 1,550 0 1,550 1,550 1,550 1,550 6215-EQUIPMENT-PARTS 7 19 481 915 6229-GENERAL SUPPLIES 8,298 5,832 8,262 8,000 8,000 4,070 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 6205-SUPPLIES 8,829 5,931 8,903 9,950 9,950 5,896 9,950 9,950 9,950 9,950 6235-CONSULTANT SERVICES 0 133 270 0 6238-POSTAGE/UPS/FEDEX 0 0 12 50 50 0 50 50 50 50 6239-PRINTING 0 206 0 0 6240-CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE 1,902 1,902 2,146 2,175 2,325 957 2,325 2,325 2,325 2,325 6249-OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 575 1,293 1,004 660 1,000 144 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,477 3,535 3,432 2,885 3,375 1,101 3,375 3,375 3,375 3,375 6255-UTILITIES-ELECTRIC 13,403 15,362 16,203 15,000 16,000 7,301 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 6256-UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS 4,027 3,645 4,517 4,700 4,700 3,862 4,700 5,600 4,700 5,600 6257-UTILITIES-PROPANE/WATER/SEWER 422 886 840 400 400 204 400 400 400 400 6250-UTILITIES 17,851 19,894 21,559 20,100 21,100 11,366 21,100 22,000 21,100 22,000 6265-REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 5,343 4,552 6,116 7,400 7,400 5,719 7,400 7,400 7,400 7,400 6266-REPAIRS-BUILDING 2,080 5,906 1,056 7,710 7,710 518 7,710 7,710 7,710 7,710 6269-REPAIRS-OTHER 106 0 0 0 6260-REPAIRS AND MAINTENA 7,529 10,458 7,171 15,110 15,110 6,238 15,110 15,110 15,110 15,110 6275-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL 0 0 0 100 100 255 100 100 100 100 6277-MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE 65 0 9 350 350 266 350 350 350 350 6280-DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 2,656 556 562 435 435 237 435 435 435 435 6281-UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 665 392 126 500 500 0 600 600 600 600 6270-TRNG/TRAVL/DUES/UNIF 3,386 947 697 1,385 1,385 758 1,485 1,485 1,485 1,485 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 40,072 40,766 41,762 49,430 50,920 25,359 51,020 51,920 51,020 51,920 6310-RENTAL EXPENSE 188,463 184,073 186,688 187,400 193,400 92,089 193,400 193,400 193,400 193,400 6311-INSURANCE-PROPERTY/LIABILITY 28,700 28,700 29,600 29,600 33,100 13,792 41,100 41,100 43,000 43,000 6333-GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS -65 -35 -39 -30 City of Apple Valley 322 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) LIQUOR STORE#1 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6349-LATE FEES/FINANCE CHARGES 7 0 6351-VISA/BANK CHARGES 67,927 84,748 94,573 68,000 85,000 40,641 105,000 105,000 105,000 110,000 6399-OTHER CHARGES 5 0 10 5 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES 285,029 297,486 310,838 285,000 311,500 146,497 339,500 339,500 341,400 346,400 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES 285,029 297,486 310,838 285,000 311,500 146,497 339,500 339,500 341,400 346,400 6401-EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 6400-TOTAL EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 6510-LIQUOR 1,087,427 1,197,120 1,239,982 3,289,400 3,401,600 514,015 3,436,400 3,436,400 3,508,820 3,508,820 6520-WINE 559,857 585,629 598,868 240,859 6530-BEER 1,414,522 1,606,806 1,614,962 630,892 6540-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE 47,127 59,032 67,559 22,646 6545-NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE 42,059 45,037 52,376 23,221 6550-FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE 21,399 21,560 23,814 8,994 6501-TAXABLE/NON-TAXABLE MISC RESAL 3,172,391 3,515,183 3,597,562 3,289,400 3,401,600 1,440,628 3,436,400 3,436,400 3,508,820 3,508,820 6500-TOTAL EXPENDITURES 3,172,391 3,515,183 3,597,562 3,289,400 3,401,600 1,440,628 3,436,400 3,436,400 3,508,820 3,508,820 6610-DEPRECIATION 19,352 22,150 22,544 19,100 19,100 9,657 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 6601-TOTAL DEPRECIATION 19,352 22,150 22,544 19,100 19,100 9,657 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 6600-TOTAL DEPRECIATION 19,352 22,150 22,544 19,100 19,100 9,657 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 6740-CAPITAL OUTLAY-MACH/EQ/OTHER 0 0 0 10,000 8,000 8,905 0 0 0 0 6701-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 0 0 0 10,000 8,000 8,905 0 0 0 0 6700-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 0 0 0 10,000 8,000 8,905 0 0 0 0 3,823,850 4,250,708 4,364,318 4,059,295 4,214,005 1,824,339 4,320,400 4,321,300 4,414,995 4,420,895 323 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 57: LIQUOR STORE NO 1-5010&5025 COMPANY 5000: LIQUOR FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND 4410 Total Sales-Store#1 4,633,000 4,791,000 4,750,000 4,845,000 4,840,000 4,942,000 4,942,000 COST OF GOODS SOLD 3,289,400 3,401,600 3,372,500 3,436,400 3,436,400 3,508,820 3,508,820 Gross Margin 1,343,600 1,389,400 1,377,500 1,408,600 1,403,600 1,433,180 1,433,180 t SALARIES 6110 Regular Employees 156,585 157,680 166,815 165,130 165,130 175,185 175,185 6111 Salary-Parttime 137,025 151,120 165,000 182,350 182,350 187,700 187,700 6113 Overtime-Reg 2,100 2,100 1,000 2,100 2,100 2,100 2,100 6114 Overtime-Part time 5,100 5,100 - 5,100 5,100 5,100 5,100 6110.1 Salaries-Other 7,520 9,135 - 8,865 8,865 8,205 8,205 6138 Medicare 4,470 4,715 4,715 5,270 5,270 5,485 5,485 6139 FICA 19,115 20,160 20,160 22,540 22,540 23,455 23,455 6141 Pension-PERA 23,125 24,385 24,382 27,265 27,265 28,370 28,370 6142 Workers Compensation 14,150 14,150 14,150 15,820 15,820 17,290 17,290 6144 Long-term Disability Insurance 455 460 460 480 480 505 505 6145 Hospital&Life Insurance 36,720 35,880 35,880 37,560 37,560 39,360 39,360 6170 Employee Paid Premiums - (2,000) (2,000) (2,000) (2,000) (2,000) (2,000) Total 406,365 422,885 430,562 470,480 470,480 490,755 490,755 6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES Miscellaneous 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 Total 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 6211 SMALL TOOL&EQUIPMENT Misc.Exp 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 Vacuum 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 Beer Taps 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 Computers/Register items 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 Total 1,550 1,550 1,550 1,550 1,550 1,550 1,550 6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES Bags,Cleaning Supplies,etc. 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 Total 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 6238 POSTAGE/UPS/FEDEX 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Total 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 6240 C.SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVAL Rubbish Removal 1,500 1,700 1,700 1,700 1,700 1,700 1,700 Rug Service 250 200 200 200 200 200 200 Carpet Cleaning/Tile 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 Window Washing 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 Total 2,175 2,325 2,325 2,325 2,325 2,325 2,325 6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES Alarm Monitoring 260 600 600 600 600 600 600 Music 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 Miscellaneous 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 Total 660 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC 15,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 Total 15,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS 4,700 4,700 5,600 4,700 5,600 4,700 5,600 Total 4,700 4,700 5,600 4,700 5,600 4,700 5,600 6257 UTILITIES-OTHER 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 Total 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT Copier Maint.Agreement 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 Cash Registers Maint.Agreement 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 Payment Terminals Maint.Agreement 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 Microsoft POS License Fee 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 E-commerce Fees 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 Misc/Baler,Fire ext serv,etc. 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 Computer/Register Systems 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 Alarm repairs 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 Total 7,400 7,400 7,400 7,400 7,400 7,400 7,400 6266 REPAIRS-BUILDINGS Miscellaneous 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 Annual Fire Spklr test 210 210 210 210 210 210 210 Rooftop heating units 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 Cooler 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 Total 7,710 7,710 7,710 7,710 7,710 7,710 7,710 324 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 57: LIQUOR STORE NO 1-5010&5025 COMPANY 5000: LIQUOR FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND 6275 SCHOOL/CONF/EXP-LOCAL Seminars/Training 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 6277 MILEAGE ALLOWANCE Miscellaneous 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 Total 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 6280 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS Retailers ID Card(Buyers Card) 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 Miscellaneous 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Chamber Dues 340 340 340 340 340 340 340 ID Checking Guide 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Total 435 435 435 435 435 435 435 6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE Miscellaneous 500 500 600 600 600 600 600 Total 500 500 600 600 600 600 600 6310 RENTAL EXPENSE Base Rent 138,000 144,000 144,000 144,000 144,000 144,000 144,000 Copier Lease 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 Taxes 26,000 26,000 26,000 26,000 26,000 26,000 26,000 Common Mall Area Maint 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 Total 187,400 193,400 193,400 193,400 193,400 193,400 193,400 6311 INSURANCE Dram Shop 4,500 4,800 4,800 6,800 6,800 7,000 7,000 Property&Muni Liab 25,100 28,300 28,300 34,300 34,300 36,000 36,000 Total 29,600 33,100 33,100 41,100 41,100 43,000 43,000 6351 VISA/BANK CHARGES Credit Card Charges 68,000 85,000 100,000 105,000 105,000 110,000 110,000 Total 68,000 85,000 100,000 105,000 105,000 110,000 110,000 6610 DEPRECIATION 19,100 19,100 19,100 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 Total 19,100 19,100 19,100 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 6740 CAPITAL OUTLAY-MACH/EQ/OTHER 3 Door Cooler - 8,000 - - - - - New Server 22,000 Camera Replacement 10,000 - 35,000 - - - - Total 10,000 8,000 57,000 - - - - Total Net of Personnel 363,530 389,520 454,520 413,520 414,420 420,420 421,320 TOTAL EXPENSES $ 769,895 $ 812,405 $ 885,082 $ 884,000 $ 884,900 $ 911,175 $ 912,075 City of Apple Valley 325 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) LIQUOR STORE#2 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6110-SALARY-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 88,598 88,157 91,894 87,250 89,870 40,506 92,565 92,565 95,350 95,350 6111-SALARY PART-TIME 24,405 42,388 91,068 57,905 59,610 46,572 131,820 131,820 137,660 137,660 6112-SALARY-SEASONAL TEMP 61,055 34,388 0 40,170 44,170 0 0 0 0 0 6113-OVERTIME-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 0 0 0 1,600 1,600 0 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 6114-OVERTIME PART-TIME EMPLOYEES 256 729 540 1,900 1,900 0 1,900 1,900 1,900 1,900 6118-VACATION PAY 2,803 8,481 7,921 0 6119-ANNUAL LEAVE 2,826 6121-INSURANCE CASH BENEFIT 720 720 720 360 6123-SALARY-OTHER 5,865 5,565 5,215 5,215 5,215 5,215 6124-OVERTIME-SEASONAL TEMP 1,058 694 15 0 6105-SALARIES AND WAGES 178,895 175,556 192,158 194,690 202,715 90,264 233,100 233,100 241,725 241,725 6138-MEDICARE 2,538 2,422 2,671 2,825 2,940 1,304 3,380 3,380 3,505 3,505 6139-FICA 10,853 10,158 11,421 12,070 12,570 5,574 14,450 14,450 14,985 14,985 6141-PENSIONS-PERA 12,874 12,427 13,692 14,600 15,205 6,672 17,485 17,485 18,130 18,130 6142-WORKERS COMPENSATION 6,606 6,395 8,051 8,935 8,820 3,661 10,145 10,145 11,045 11,045 6143-UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 3,891 0 0 0 6144-LONG-TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE 169 176 150 365 255 63 260 260 270 270 6145-MEDICAL INSURANCE 6,215 12,928 11,729 13,885 13,510 4,103 14,435 14,435 15,395 15,395 6146-DENTAL INSURANCE 1,565 1,569 1,565 715 6147-LIFE INSURANCE-BASIC 6 6 7 9 6148-LIFE INSURANCE-SUPP/DEPEND 55 56 57 42 6125-EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 44,772 46,136 49,342 52,680 53,300 22,143 60,155 60,155 63,330 63,330 6100-TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 223,667 221,692 241,500 247,370 256,015 112,407 293,255 293,255 305,055 305,055 6210-OFFICE SUPPLIES 40 0 25 250 250 0 250 250 250 250 6211-SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT 44 721 0 1200 1,200 15 1,200 1,200 900 900 6215-EQUIPMENT-PARTS 0 0 0 438 6229-GENERAL SUPPLIES 2,902 2,216 2,287 3,000 3,000 1,678 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 6205-SUPPLIES 2,986 2,937 2,312 4,450 4,450 2,131 4,450 4,450 4,150 4,150 6235-CONSULTANT SERVICES 0 133 650 0 6238-POSTAGE/UPS/FEDEX 12 50 50 0 50 50 50 50 6239-PRINTING 0 206 0 0 6240-CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE 1,411 1,326 1,128 1,600 1,750 518 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 6249-OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,081 2,993 3,917 2,510 3,100 1,208 3,100 3,100 3,100 3,100 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,492 4,658 5,707 4,160 4,900 1,725 4,900 4,900 4,900 4,900 6255-UTILITIES-ELECTRIC 7,290 7,188 7,684 8,000 8,000 3,183 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 6256-UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS 2,314 1,606 1,796 1,800 1,800 2,240 1,800 3,300 1,800 3,300 6257-UTILITIES-PROPANE/WATER/SEWER 311 408 353 380 380 235 450 450 450 450 6250-UTILITIES 9,915 9,201 9,833 10,180 10,180 5,659 10,250 11,750 10,250 11,750 6265-REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 2,493 2,114 2,752 5,875 5,875 2,674 5,875 5,875 5,875 5,875 6266-REPAIRS-BUILDING 1,601 2,341 3,849 3,060 3,060 720 3,060 3,060 3,060 3,060 6269-REPAIRS-OTHER 319 0 200 1,000 1,000 0 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6260-REPAIRS AND MAINTENA 4,413 4,455 6,801 9,935 9,935 3,394 9,935 9,935 9,935 9,935 6275-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL 0 0 0 100 100 90 100 100 100 100 6277-MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE 50 50 350 350 350 350 6280-DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 1,516 362 368 385 385 22 385 385 385 385 6281-UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 82 0 137 200 200 0 400 400 400 400 6270-TRNG/TRAVL/DUES/UNIF 1,598 362 505 735 735 112 1,235 1,235 1,235 1,235 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 22,403 21,613 25,159 29,460 30,200 13,021 30,770 32,270 30,470 31,970 6310-RENTAL EXPENSE 150 361 361 400 400 150 400 400 400 400 6311-INSURANCE-PROPERTY/LIABILITY 14,000 14,050 15,000 15,000 15,300 6,375 18,400 18,400 19,000 19,000 6333-GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS -29 -13 -14 -10 City of Apple Valley 326 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) LIQUOR STORE#2 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6349-LATE FEES/FINANCE CHARGES 22 0 6351-VISA/BANK CHARGES 28,527 27,212 35,340 36,000 36,000 16,062 45,000 45,000 50,000 50,000 6399-OTHER CHARGES 210 0 0 0 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES 42,859 41,610 50,710 51,400 51,700 22,578 63,800 63,800 69,400 69,400 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES 42,859 41,610 50,710 51,400 51,700 22,578 63,800 63,800 69,400 69,400 6401-EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 6400-TOTAL EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 6510-LIQUOR 376,749 324,622 398,413 1,107,600 1,246,050 187,144 1,231,140 1,231,140 1,255,990 1,255,990 6520-WINE 255,962 214,554 234,926 101,524 6530-BEER 555,977 508,975 573,039 240,855 6540-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE 37,872 14,778 21,441 8,019 6545-NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE 15,718 13,359 17,050 8,843 6550-FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE 9,184 6,797 8,541 3,604 6501-TAXABLE/NON-TAXABLE MISC RESAL 1,251,462 1,083,085 1,253,409 1,107,600 1,246,050 549,989 1,231,140 1,231,140 1,255,990 1,255,990 6500-TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,251,462 1,083,085 1,253,409 1,107,600 1,246,050 549,989 1,231,140 1,231,140 1,255,990 1,255,990 6610-DEPRECIATION 22,839 21,898 21,940 19,700 22,000 10,553 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 6601-TOTAL DEPRECIATION 22,839 21,898 21,940 19,700 22,000 10,553 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 6600-TOTAL DEPRECIATION 22,839 21,898 21,940 19,700 22,000 10,553 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 6740-CAPITAL OUTLAY-MACH/EQ/OTHER 0 0 0 20,000 0 0 6701-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 0 0 0 20,000 0 0 6700-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 0 0 0 20,000 0 0 1,563,229 1,389,899 1,592,716 1,475,530 1,605,965 708,547 1,640,965 1,642,465 1,682,915 1,684,415 327 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 58: LIQUOR STORE NO 2-5050&5065 COMPANY 5000: LIQUOR FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND 5045 Total Sales-Store#2 1,506,000 1,755,000 1,700,000 1,734,000 1,734,000 1,769,000 1,769,000 6510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1,107,600 1,246,050 1,207,000 1,231,140 1,231,140 1,255,990 1,255,990 Gross Margin 398,400 508,950 493,000 502,860 502,860 513,010 513,010 SALARIES 6110 Regular Employees 87,250 89,870 91,830 92,565 92,565 95,350 95,350 6111 Salary-Parttime 98,075 103,780 101,920 131,820 131,820 137,660 137,660 6113 Overtime-Reg 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 6114 Overtime-Part time 1,900 1,900 1,900 1,900 1,900 1,900 1,900 6110.1 Salaries-Other 5,865 5,565 5,565 5,215 5,215 5,215 5,215 6138 Medicare 2,825 2,940 2,940 3,380 3,380 3,505 3,505 6139 FICA 12,070 12,570 12,570 14,450 14,450 14,985 14,985 6141 Pension-PERA 14,600 15,205 15,205 17,485 17,485 18,130 18,130 6142 Workers Compensation 8,935 8,820 8,820 10,145 10,145 11,045 11,045 6144 Long-term Disability Insurance 365 255 255 260 260 270 270 6145 Hospital&Life Insurance 13,885 13,510 13,510 14,435 14,435 15,395 15,395 Total 247,370 256,015 256,115 293,255 293,255 305,055 305,055 6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES Miscellaneous 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 Total 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 6211 SMALL TOOL&EQUIPMENT Miscellaneous 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 Vacuum 650 650 650 650 650 350 350 Computers/Register items 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 Total 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 900 900 6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES Bags,Cleaning Supplies,etc 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 Total 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 6238 POSTAGE/UPS/FEDEX 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Total 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 6240 C.SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVAL Rubbish Removal 950 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 Carpet Cleaning 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 Rug Service 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 Total 1,600 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES Alarm Monitoring 260 850 850 850 850 850 850 Misc 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 Music 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 Mowing 1,900 1,900 1,900 1,900 1,900 1,900 1,900 Total 2,510 3,100 3,100 3,100 3,100 3,100 3,100 6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 Total 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS 1,800 1,800 3,300 1,800 3,300 1,800 3,300 Total 1,800 1,800 3,300 1,800 3,300 1,800 3,300 6257 UTILITIES-OTHER Water&Sewer 380 380 380 450 450 450 450 Total 380 380 380 450 450 450 450 6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT Cash Register Maint Agreement 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Payment Terminals Maint.Agreement 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 Microsoft POS License Fee 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 E-commerce Fees 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 Misc/Conveyor 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 Computer/Register Systems 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 Alarm Repairs 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 Copier Maint.Agreement 375 375 375 375 375 375 375 HVAC Maintenance 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 Total 5,875 5,875 5,875 5,875 5,875 5,875 5,875 328 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 58: LIQUOR STORE NO 2-5050&5065 COMPANY 5000: LIQUOR FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND 6266 REPAIRS-BUILDINGS Furnace,Compressor,Cooler etc. 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 Misc/Electric work 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Repair office flooring Annual Fire Spklr test 210 210 210 210 210 210 210 Irrigation start up/fall blowout 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 Total 3,060 3,060 3,060 3,060 3,060 3,060 3,060 6269 REPAIRS-OTHER Store Exterior,Paint or Repairs 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Total 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6275 SCHOOL/CONF/EXP-LOCAL Seminars/Training 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 6277 MILEAGE ALLOWANCE 50 50 50 350 350 350 350 Total 50 50 50 350 350 350 350 6280 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS Retailers ID Card(Buyers Card) 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 ID Checking Guide 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Chamber Dues 340 340 340 340 340 340 340 Total 385 385 385 385 385 385 385 6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE Miscellaneous 200 200 400 400 400 400 400 Total 200 200 400 400 400 400 400 6310 RENTAL EXPENSE Copier Lease 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 Total 400 400 400 400 400 400 6311 INSURANCE Dram Shop 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,400 2,400 3,000 3,000 Property&muni liab 13,000 13,300 13,300 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 Total 15,000 15,300 15,300 18,400 18,400 19,000 19,000 6351 VISA/BANK CHARGES Credit Card Charges 36,000 36,000 40,000 45,000 45,000 50,000 50,000 36,000 36,000 40,000 45,000 45,000 50,000 50,000 6610 DEPRECIATION 19,700 22,000 220,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 Total 19,700 22,000 220,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 6740 CAPITAL OUTLAY-OTHER ITEMS Camera Replacement 28,000 New Server 22,000 Signage Upgrade 20,000 - Total 20,000 - 50,000 - - - - Total Net of Personnel 120,560 103,900 357,200 116,570 118,070 121,870 123,370 TOTAL EXPENSES $ 367,930 $ 359,915 $ 613,315 $ 409,825 $ 411,325 $ 426,925 $ 428,425 City of Apple Valley 329 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) LIQUOR STORE#3 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6110-SALARY-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 110,487 119,764 113,941 128,820 132,270 60,466 136,540 136,540 144,860 144,860 6111-SALARY PART-TIME 0 2,696 100,195 111,970 123,400 70,750 163,600 163,600 168,400 168,400 6112-SALARY-SEASONAL TEMP 104,688 115,771 31,877 0 0 0 6113-OVERTIME-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 547 833 1,339 1,500 1,500 0 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 6114-OVERTIME PART-TIME EMPLOYEES 0 0 0 3,200 3,200 0 3,200 3,200 3,200 3,200 6118-VACATION PAY -144 4,285 1,341 0 6119-ANNUAL LEAVE 1,272 6121-INSURANCE CASH BENEFIT 180 360 0 0 6123-SALARY-OTHER 8,235 5,215 6,265 6,265 6,630 6,630 6124-OVERTIME-SEASONAL TEMP 2,646 2,544 87 0 6105-SALARIES AND WAGES 218,403 246,253 248,780 253,725 265,585 132,488 311,105 311,105 324,590 324,590 6138-MEDICARE 3,128 3,390 3,426 3,635 3,850 1,835 4,510 4,510 4,705 4,705 6139-FICA 13,375 14,471 14,651 15,545 16,465 7,847 19,290 19,290 20,125 20,125 6141-PENSIONS-PERA 15,894 17,350 18,141 18,805 19,920 9,734 23,335 23,335 24,345 24,345 6142-WORKERS COMPENSATION 7,904 8,812 11,237 11,510 11,560 5,819 13,540 13,540 14,835 14,835 6144-LONG-TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE 216 234 184 690 380 92 395 395 415 415 6145-MEDICAL INSURANCE 19,748 46,025 41,202 32,245 35,880 16,258 37,560 37,560 39,360 39,360 6146-DENTAL INSURANCE 1,471 3,009 2,164 990 6147-LIFE INSURANCE-BASIC 9 12 12 19 6148-LIFE INSURANCE-SUPP/DEPEND 108 84 0 0 6170-EMPLOYEE PAID PREMIUMS -3,333 -6,836 -8,920 -4,000 -1,408 -4,100 -4,100 -4,100 -4,100 6125-EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 58,520 86,550 82,098 82,430 84,055 41,185 94,530 94,530 99,685 99,685 6100-TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 276,923 332,804 330,877 336,155 349,640 173,673 405,635 405,635 424,275 424,275 6210-OFFICE SUPPLIES 357 140 120 400 400 52 400 400 400 400 6211-SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT 822 43 0 1,200 1,200 65 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 6212-MOTOR FUELS/OILS 7 0 0 0 6215-EQUIPMENT-PARTS 0 0 0 438 6229-GENERAL SUPPLIES 4,388 4,706 4,320 5,500 5,500 3,315 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 6205-SUPPLIES 5,573 4,890 4,440 7,100 7,100 3,870 7,100 7,100 7,100 7,100 6235-CONSULTANT SERVICES 0 133 255 0 6238-POSTAGE/UPS/FEDEX 0 0 12 50 50 0 50 50 50 50 6239-PRINTING 0 832 0 0 6240-CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE 985 1,420 1,237 1,550 1,550 432 1,550 1,550 1,550 1,550 6249-OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,485 7,903 5,629 3,360 3,750 2,320 7,150 7,150 7,150 7,150 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6,470 10,288 7,133 4,960 5,350 2,752 8,750 8,750 8,750 8,750 6255-UTILITIES-ELECTRIC 20.638 22,628 22,259 21,500 23,000 12,461 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 6257-UTILITIES-PROPANE/WATER/SEWER 431 779 272 600 800 433 800 800 900 900 6250-UTILITIES 21,069 23,408 22,531 22,100 23,800 12,894 23,800 23,800 23,900 23,900 6265-REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 5,284 4,374 5,813 7,463 7,463 5,725 7,465 7,465 7,465 7,465 6266-REPAIRS-BUILDING 5,037 25,867 1,898 8,060 8,060 285 8,060 8,060 8,060 8,060 6269-REPAIRS-OTHER 850 0 0 3,000 3,000 0 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 6260-REPAIRS AND MAINTENA 11,171 30,240 7,712 18,523 18,523 6,010 18,525 18,525 18,525 18,525 6275-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL 6 0 0 100 100 255 100 100 100 100 6277-MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE 32 0 0 50 50 0 350 350 350 350 6280-DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 2,660 362 368 485 485 43 485 485 485 485 6281-UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 258 258 0 300 300 0 500 500 500 500 6270-TRNG/TRAVL/DUES/UNIF 2,957 620 368 935 935 298 1,435 1,435 1,435 1,435 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 47,240 69,445 42,184 53,618 55,708 25,824 59,610 59,610 59,710 59,710 6310-RENTAL EXPENSE -852 4,376 2,275 3,800 3,800 1,850 3,800 3,800 3,800 3,800 6311-INSURANCE-PROPERTY/LIABILITY 23,900 23,950 24,600 24,600 33,200 13,833 39,300 39,300 41,000 41,000 6333-GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS -38 -18 -22 -17 City of Apple Valley 330 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) LIQUOR STORE#3 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6349-LATE FEES/FINANCE CHARGES 10 0 6351-VISA/BANK CHARGES 61,228 80,869 90,549 60,000 85,000 37,972 95,000 95,000 100,000 100,000 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES 84,237 109,177 117,411 88,400 122,000 53,639 138,100 138,100 144,800 144,800 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES 84,237 109,177 117,411 88,400 122,000 53,639 138,100 138,100 144,800 144,800 6401-EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 6400-TOTAL EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 6510-LIQUOR 690,094 882,078 913,521 2,947,200 3,165,900 390,250 2,941,530 2,941,530 3,029,570 3,029,570 6520-WINE 633,704 673,577 671,355 275,180 6530-BEER 1,113,173 1,474,151 1,460,075 481,058 6540-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE 30,706 51,814 48,844 18,485 6545-NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE 26,214 25,666 30,097 14,143 6550-FREIGHT ON RESALE MDSE 17,773 20,669 18,640 7,587 6501-TAXABLE/NON-TAXABLE MISC RESAL 2,511,664 3,127,955 3,142,531 2,947,200 3,165,900 1,186,704 2,941,530 2,941,530 3,029,570 3,029,570 6500-TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,511,664 3,127,955 3,142,531 2,947,200 3,165,900 1,186,704 2,941,530 2,941,530 3,029,570 3,029,570 6610-DEPRECIATION 98,582 106,186 107,077 106,000 106,000 43,669 106,000 106,000 106,000 106,000 6601-TOTAL DEPRECIATION 98,582 106,186 107,077 106,000 106,000 43,669 106,000 106,000 106,000 106,000 6600-TOTAL DEPRECIATION 98,582 106,186 107,077 106,000 106,000 43,669 106,000 106,000 106,000 106,000 6740-CAPITAL OUTLAY-MACH/EQ/OTHER 0 0 0 0 10,000 0 15,000 15,000 0 0 6701-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 0 0 0 0 10,000 0 15,000 15,000 0 0 6700-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 0 0 0 0 10,000 0 15,000 15,000 0 0 6910-BOND PRINCIPAL 0 0 6901-TOTAL DEBT SERVICE 0 0 6900-TOTAL DEBT SERVICE 0 0 7015-DEBT SERVICE-INTEREST 0 0 0 0 0 0 7001-TOTAL INTEREST AND FISCAL FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 7000-TOTAL INTEREST AND FISCAL FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,018,646 3,745,566 3,740,081 3,531,373 3,809,248 1,483,509 3,665,875 3,665,875 3,764,355 3,764,355 331 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 59: LIQUOR STORE NO 3-5080&5095 COMPANY 5000: LIQUOR FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND 5075 Total Sales-Store#3 4,151,000 4,459,000 4,022,000 4,143,000 4,143,000 4,267,000 4,267,000 6510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 2,947,200 3,165,900 2,855,620 2,941,530 2,941,530 3,029,570 3,029,570 Gross Margin 1,203,800 1,293,100 1,166,380 1,201,470 1,201,470 1,237,430 1,237,430 SALARIES 6110 Regular Employees 128,820 132,270 132,100 136,540 136,540 144,860 144,860 6111 Salary-Parttime 111,970 123,400 152,600 163,600 163,600 168,400 168,400 6113 Overtime-Reg 1,500 1,500 - 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 6114 Overtime-Parttime 3,200 3,200 - 3,200 3,200 3,200 3,200 6110.1 Salaries-Other 8,235 5,215 - 6,265 6,265 6,630 6,630 6138 Medicare 3,635 3,850 3,850 4,510 4,510 4,705 4,705 6139 FICA 15,545 16,465 16,465 19,290 19,290 20,125 20,125 6141 Pension-PERA 18,805 19,920 19,920 23,335 23,335 24,345 24,345 6142 Workers Compensation 11,510 11,560 11,560 13,540 13,540 14,835 14,835 6144 Long-term Disability Insurance 690 380 380 395 395 415 415 6145 Hospital&Life Insurance 32,245 35,880 35,880 37,560 37,560 39,360 39,360 6170 Employee Paid Premiums - (4,000) (4,000) (4,100) (4,100) (4,100) (4,100) Total 336,155 349,640 368,755 405,635 405,635 424,275 424,275 6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES Miscellaneous 400 400 1,300 400 400 400 400 Total 400 400 1,300 400 400 400 400 6211 SMALL TOOL&EQUIPMENT Misc.Expenses 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 Vacuum/Cooler parts 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 Computer/Register Systems 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 Total 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES Bags,Cleaning Supplies,etc 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Signage 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 Total 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 6238 POSTAGE/UPS/FEDEX 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Total 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 6240 C.SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVAL Rubbish Removal 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 Carpet Cleaning 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 Rug Service 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 Window Washing 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 Total 1,550 1,550 1,550 1,550 1,550 1,550 1,550 6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES Alarm Monitoring 260 850 850 850 850 850 850 HVAC Maintenance Contract 3,400 3,400 3,400 3,400 3,400 Miscellaneous 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Music 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 Mowing 2,800 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 Total 3,360 3,750 7,150 7,150 7,150 7,150 7,150 6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC 21,500 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 Total 21,500 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 6257 UTILITIES-OTHER Water/Irrigation&Sewer 600 800 800 800 900 900 Total 600 800 - 800 800 900 900 6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT Copier Maint.Agreement 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 Cash Register Maint Agreement 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 Payment Terminals Maint.Agreement 513 513 513 515 515 515 515 Microsoft POS License Fee 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 E-commerce Fees 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 Computer/Register Systems 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 Alarm Repairs 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 HVAC Maintenance 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 Batteries for Floor machine 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 Total 7,463 7,463 7,463 7,465 7,465 7,465 7,465 332 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 59: LIQUOR STORE NO 3-5080&5095 COMPANY 5000: LIQUOR FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND 6266 REPAIRS-BUILDINGS Heat Pumps,Compressor,Cooler etc. 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 Irrigation Maintenance 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 Landscape Maintenance 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 Annual Fire Sprkl test 210 210 210 210 210 210 210 Annual Irrigation valve test 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 Total 8,060 8,060 8,060 8,060 8,060 8,060 8,060 6269 REPAIRS-OTHER Store Exterior,Paint or Repairs 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Infiltation basin maintenance 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 1 2,000 Total 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 6275 SCHOOL/CONF/EXP-LOCAL Seminars/Training 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 6277 MILEAGE ALLOWANCE 50 50 50 350 350 350 350 Total 50 50 50 350 350 350 350 6280 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS Retailers ID Card(Buyers Card) 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 ID Checking Guide 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Miscellaneous Subscriptions 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Chamber Dues 340 340 340 340 340 340 340 Total 485 485 485 485 485 485 485 6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 300 300 500 500 500 500 500 Total 300 300 500 500 500 500 500 6310 Rental Copier Lease 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 Cobblestone Maintenance Agreement 3,400 3,400 _ 3,400 3,400 3,400 3,400 3,400 Total 3,800 3,800 3,800 3,800 3,800 3,800 3,800 6311 INSURANCE Dram Shop 4,100 4,400 4,400 5,800 5,800 6,000 6,000 Prop Ins 20,500 28,800 28,800 33,500 33,500 35,000 35,000 Total 24,600 33,200 33,200 39,300 39,300 41,000 41,000 6351 VISA/BANK CHARGES Credit Card Charges 60,000 85,000 90,000 95,000 95,000 100,000 100,000 60,000 85,000 90,000 95,000 95,000 100,000 100,000 6610 DEPRECIATION 106,000 106,000 106,000 106,000 106,000 106,000 106,000 Total _ 106,000 106,000 106,000 106,000 106,000 106,000 106,000 6740 CAPITAL OUTLAY-OTHER ITEMS Camera Replacement 50,000 New Server 22,000 Beer Cave Shelving&Reset - 10,000 - 15,000 15,000 Total - 10,000 72,000 15,000 15,000 - - Total Net of Personnel 248,018 293,708 364,408 318,710 318,710 310,510 310,510 TOTAL EXPENSES $ 584,173 $ 643,348 $ 733,163 $ 724,345 $ 724,345 $ 734,785 $ 734,785 333 COMPANY DEPARTMENT BUSINESS UNIT ACTIVITY 5200 63 5205 Arena I DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY The Sports Arena was built specifically to service the community indoor skating programs. The facility is jointly owned and shared with School District 196. It is an excellent example of two government entities sharing resources. The arena services the Apple Valley/Burnsville Hockey Association, the Eastview Hockey Association and High Schools and also provides leisure opportunities through public skating sessions. The facility offers an excellent Learn to Skate program which teaches 300-400 students per year the basics of ice skating. Thousands of participants utilize the facility each week during the fall and winter months. Events include Learn to Skate lessons, hockey practices and games, figure skating ice shows, as well as public skating sessions. Each of these events bring in unique visitors to the facility. Performance can be measured by the amount of hours rented by our user groups. The Sports Arena converts from ice to four indoor tennis courts for the spring and summer months. These tennis courts are used by the Apple Valley Boys and Girls Tennis teams, AVHS gym classes, and a yearly consignment sale in the late summer. MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2023 & 2024 Continue to create and foster a diverse, inclusive and welcoming facility for all staff, customers and the public. We have a very diverse population in Apple Valley and we need to continue working at doing better job reflecting that in our facilities. Without Hayes Arena operating as a dry land/turf option we need to grow our dry land rentals at the Sports Arena for the spring and summer months. We have a great space for events i.e. consignment sales, home and garden shows, craft sales and recreational programming options. Improve customer experience in our arenas. We do a very good job of providing excellent customer service but there are things we can do to improve the atmosphere of our facility. By improving the atmosphere we can retain customers and hopefully increase revenues in all areas. IMPACT MEASURES / PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual Actual Actual Projected Projected Projected Item 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Hours of Ice time rented 1,113 908 1,250 1,300 1,300 1,300 Hours of Ice time used JPA with 458 347 456 500 500 500 ISD 196 # of Skating Lesson Participants 342 240 380 385 390 390 Hours of Dry Floor time rented 130 70 110 300 300 300 Hours of Dry Floor Time used per 215 115 220 400 400 400 JPA with ISD 196 334 Regular Status Personnel Schedule - FTE's Actual Actual Actual Proposed Proposed Proposed Position Title 2018 2019 2020 2022 2023 2024 Arena Manager 1 1 1 1 1 1 Working Foreman .75 .75 .75 .75 .75 .75 Pooled Park Maint. .11 .11 .12 .12 .12 Total 1.86 1.86 1.86 1.87 1.87 1.87 Temporary Status Personnel Schedule - (Part-Time hours) Actual Actual Actual Proposed Proposed Proposed Position Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Facility Assistant 632 752 928 700 650 650 Ice Guard/Concessions 1,259 753 525 1,600 750 750 Ice Resurfacer Driver 1,670 1,647 2,557 1,900 2,000 2,000 Instructor I 658 405 108 700 400 400 Instructor II 186 126 163 300 300 Rec Program Director/Assistant 334 213 145 400 400 400 Total 4,737 3,895 4,426 5,300 4,500 4,500 Interfund Loan Repayment Schedule Total Beg Bal Payment Prin Int End Bal 2020 $ 1,087,500 $ 80,000 $ 67,494 $ 12,506 $ 1,020,006 2021 1,020,006 80,000 68,270 11,730 951,736 2022 951,736 80,000 69,055 10,945 882,681 2023 882,681 80,000 69,849 10,151 812,832 2024 812,832 80,000 70,652 9,348 742,180 2025 742,180 80,000 71,465 8,535 670,715 2026 670,715 80,000 72,287 7,713 598,428 2027 598,428 80,000 73,118 6,882 525,310 2028 525,310 80,000 73,959 6,041 451,351 2029 451,351 80,000 74,809 5,191 376,542 2030 376,542 80,000 75,670 4,330 300,872 2031 300,872 80,000 76,540 3,460 224,332 2032 224,332 80,000 77,420 2,580 146,912 2033 146,912 80,000 78,311 1,689 68,601 2034 68,601 69,390 68,601 789 - 335 Summary Budget Department 63 Business Unit#5205 (Arena I) 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Proposed Proposed Proposed Revenue: 4810/12/13/21-Ice Revenue 191,538 115,255 143,510 202,600 209,000 216,500 220,000 4820-School District Share 194,134 199,083 211,773 200,000 205,000 210,000 215,000 4811/14/15/16-Sales/Concess 11,499 2,485 3,863 19,000 17,000 16,500 10,000 4823/4824-Turf&Court Rentals - 70 3,361 5,000 5,000 8,500 8,500 4358/4899-Other - - - 12,000 - - - 397,171 316,893 362,507 438,600 436,000 451,500 453,500 Expenditures: Salaries&Wages 209,681 245,208 203,877 265,330 258,870 250,540 262,990 Employee Benefits 75,458 61,686 80,820 73,255 67,620 62,665 66,805 Supplies 17,597 9,678 15,792 15,500 17,500 16,900 17,900 Contractual Services 34,555 18,732 14,319 29,700 13,500 34,300 22,300 Utilities 57,723 71,290 74,881 64,100 63,000 90,000 90,000 Repairs&Maintenance 3,285 7,282 13,653 10,500 10,500 11,700 11,700 Training/Travel/Dues 2,561 1,221 2,045 6,450 6,450 6,450 6,450 Tax/Non-Tax for Resale 9,625 6,129 - 8,500 8,500 3,000 3,000 Capital Outlay - - - 15,000 - 25,000 92,500 VISA/MC Fees - 189 2,017 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Online Registration Fees 2,955 1,282 10,469 3,000 3,000 3,500 3,500 Insurance&Other Expense 20,916 21,252 21,478 22,100 23,800 24,950 25,800 Debt Service Interest - 12,506 - - 10,945 10,150 9,350 Debt Service - - - 80,000 69,055 69,850 70,650 Depreciation 44,981 174,847 184,058 60,900 60,900 185,000 185,000 Total Exp 479,338 631,302 623,409 655,335 614,640 795,005 868,945 Operating Income(loss) (82,167) (314,409) (260,902) (216,735) (178,640) (343,505) (415,445) Other Income(Exp.) School Share of Refrigeration 1,084,354 - - - - - - Property Tax (Interfund Loan) - - - 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 Interfund Loan Repayment - - - (80,000) (80,000) (80,000) (80,000) Net Income(loss) 1,002,187 (314,409) (260,902) (216,735) (178,640) (343,505) (415,445) Change in Cash: Less:Capital Outlay Not Above (2,061,213) (355,362) (19,250) - - - - Add:Interfund Loan from FCPF 1,087,500 - - - - - - Add:Depreciation 44,981 174,847 184,058 60,900 60,900 185,000 185,000 Net(decrease)in Cash 73,455 (494,924) (96,094) (155,835) (117,740) (158,505) (230,445) 336 CAPITAL OUTLAY 2023 CAPITAL OUTLAY Replace Interior Wood & Metal Doors 30,000 Less School district share (15,000) Skate Sharpener 20,000 Less:school district share (10,000) Total 25,000 2024 CAPITAL OUTLAY Replace Olympia Batteries 40,000 Less: school district share (20,000) Exterior Brick wall repair 65,500 Less:school district share (32,750) Overhead garage door replacement 34,600 Less:school district share (17,300) Replace exterior aluminum windows 4,900 Less:school district share ($22,450) Total 92,500 City of Apple Valley 337 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) ARENA I 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6110-SALARY-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 147,504 158,659 152,085 178,875 173,200 61,922 157,760 157,760 169,130 169,130 6111-SALARY PART-TIME 7,538 9,653 11,344 7,965 8,820 5,616 9,750 9,750 10,045 10,045 6112-SALARY-SEASONAL TEMP 55,577 53,633 50,832 68,160 66,470 29,837 69,625 69,625 71,710 71,710 6113-OVERTIME-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 1,939 318 0 3,500 3,500 0 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 6118-VACATION PAY -2,897 21,874 -12,203 0 6121-INSURANCE CASH BENEFIT 0 900 1,440 1,040 6122-COMP REQUEST 0 0 0 -273 6123-SALARY-OTHER 6,830 6,880 9,905 9,905 8,605 8,605 6124-OVERTIME-SEASONAL TEMP 21 170 378 271 6105-SALARIES AND WAGES 209,681 245,208 203,877 265,330 258,870 98,411 250,540 250,540 262,990 262,990 6138-MEDICARE 2,837 3,053 2,996 3,800 3,755 1,383 3,580 3,580 3,765 3,765 6139-FICA 12,132 13,056 12,809 16,235 16,050 5,913 15,315 15,315 16,090 16,090 6141-PENSIONS-PERA 13,535 15,141 13,816 14,710 14,430 5,820 13,305 13,305 14,085 14,085 6142-WORKERS COMPENSATION 4,431 3,145 4,500 5,755 6,440 2,182 6,135 6,135 6,585 6,585 6144-LONG-TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE 325 378 404 510 495 125 460 460 490 490 6145-MEDICAL INSURANCE 53,136 32,831 48,565 32,245 31,450 11,790 28,870 28,870 30,790 30,790 6146-DENTAL INSURANCE 3,129 3,524 4,499 1,430 6147-LIFE INSURANCE-BASIC 12 14 19 19 6148-LIFE INSURANCE-SUPP/DEPEND 0 0 2,940 650 6170-EMPLOYEE PAID PREMIUMS -14,078 -9,455 -9,728 -5,000 0 -5,000 -5,000 -5,000 -5,000 6125-EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 75,458 61,686 80,820 73,255 67,620 29,310 62,665 62,665 66,805 66,805 6100-TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 285,139 306,894 284,697 338,585 326,490 127,721 313,205 313,205 329,795 329,795 6210-OFFICE SUPPLIES 113 0 37 250 250 34 150 150 150 150 6211-SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT 390 348 1,221 1,100 1,100 190 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 6212-MOTOR FUELS/OILS 58 120 90 150 150 51 150 150 150 150 6214-CHEMICALS 0 1,924 2,086 0 2,000 772 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 6215-EQUIPMENT-PARTS 529 67 1,174 2,000 2,000 124 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 6229-GENERAL SUPPLIES 16,507 7,219 11,185 12,000 12,000 2,722 12,000 12,000 13,000 13,000 6205-SUPPLIES 17,597 9,678 15,792 15,500 17,500 3,894 16,900 16,900 17,900 17,900 6235-CONSULTANT SERVICES 21 21 0 408 6237-TELEPHONE/PAGERS 3,014 3,212 2,414 2,500 2,500 1,008 2,800 2,800 1,800 1,800 6238-POSTAGE/UPS/FEDEX 250 0 0 0 6239-PRINTING 0 0 0 200 200 0 200 200 200 200 6240-CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE 25.474 9,738 8,723 25,000 0 5,057 15,000 15,000 4,000 4,000 6249-OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,796 5,761 3,181 2,000 10,800 0 16,300 16,300 16,300 16,300 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 34,555 18,732 14,319 29,700 13,500 6,473 34,300 34,300 22,300 22,300 6255-UTILITIES-ELECTRIC 29,972 39,640 38,658 31,500 31,500 23,461 32,500 40,000 32,500 40,000 6256-UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS 13,840 11,746 15,448 16,000 16,000 17,687 14,000 29,000 14,000 29,000 6257-UTILITIES-PROPANE/WATER/SEWER 13,910 19,904 20,775 16,600 15,500 4,672 17,000 21,000 17,000 21,000 6250-UTILITIES 57,723 71,290 74,881 64,100 63,000 45,819 63,500 90,000 63,500 90,000 6265-REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 1,531 144 8,147 5,500 5,500 1,836 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6266-REPAIRS-BUILDING 1,753 7,138 5,506 5,000 5,000 2,636 5,200 5,200 5,200 5,200 6260-REPAIRS AND MAINTENA 3,285 7,282 13,653 10,500 10,500 4,472 11,700 11,700 11,700 11,700 6275-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL 89 0 175 250 250 25 250 250 250 250 6276-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP OTHER 787 0 604 3,000 3,000 0 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 6277-MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE 493 364 0 600 600 0 600 600 600 600 6280-DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 580 579 747 600 600 490 600 600 600 600 6281-UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 612 278 519 2,000 2,000 840 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 6270-TRNG/TRAVL/DUES/UNIF 2,561 1,221 2,045 6,450 6,450 1,355 6,450 6,450 6,450 6,450 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 115,721 108,204 120,690 126,250 110,950 62,012 132,850 159,350 121,850 148,350 6310-RENTAL EXPENSE 1,360 505 552 1,000 1,000 210 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 City of Apple Valley 338 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) ARENA I 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6311-INSURANCE-PROPERTY/LIABILITY 14,700 15,500 15,500 15,500 17,000 7,083 17,500 17,500 18,000 18,000 6333-GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS -75 -61 -95 -40 6349-LATE FEES/FINANCE CHARGES 1 34 0 0 6351-VISA/BANK CHARGES 0 189 2,017 1,000 1,000 2,182 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6355-ONLINE REGISTRATION FEES 2,955 1,282 10,469 3,000 3,000 0 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 6399-OTHER CHARGES 4,931 5,274 5,521 5,600 5,800 3,710 6,450 6,450 6,800 6,800 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES 23,871 22,723 33,964 26,100 27,800 13,146 29,450 29,450 30,300 30,300 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES 23,871 22,723 33,964 26,100 27,800 13,146 29,450 29,450 30,300 30,300 6401-EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 6400-TOTAL EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 6540-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE 9,625 6,129 0 8,500 8,500 0 6,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 6501-TAXABLE/NON-TAXABLE MISC RESAL 9,625 6,129 0 8,500 8,500 0 6,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 6500-TOTAL EXPENDITURES 9,625 6,129 0 8,500 8,500 0 6,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 6610-DEPRECIATION 44,981 174,847 184,058 60,900 60,900 75,228 60,900 185,000 60,900 185,000 6601-TOTAL DEPRECIATION 44,981 174,847 184,058 60,900 60,900 75,228 60,900 185,000 60,900 185,000 6600-TOTAL DEPRECIATION 44,981 174,847 184,058 60,900 60,900 75,228 60,900 185,000 60,900 185,000 6735-CAPITAL OUTLAY-OTHER IMPROVEME 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6740-CAPITAL OUTLAY-MACH/EQ/OTHER 0 0 0 15,000 0 0 40,000 25,000 92,500 92,500 6701-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 0 0 0 15,000 0 0 40,000 25,000 92,500 92,500 6700-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 0 0 0 15,000 0 0 40,000 25,000 92,500 92,500 6915-DEBT SERVICE-OTHER 68,270 69,055 69,850 69,850 70,650 70,650 6901-TOTAL DEBT SERVICE 68,270 69,055 69,850 69,850 70,650 70,650 6900-TOTAL DEBT SERVICE 68,270 69,055 69,850 69,850 70,650 70,650 7016-INTERFUND LOAN-INTEREST 12,506 0 11,730 10,945 0 10,150 10,150 9,350 9,350 7001-TOTAL INTEREST AND FISCAL FEES 12,506 0 11,730 10,945 0 10,150 10,150 9,350 9,350 7000-TOTAL INTEREST AND FISCAL FEES 12,506 0 11,730 10,945 0 10,150 10,150 9,350 9,350 479,338 631,302 623,408 655,335 614,640 278,107 662,405 795,005 718,345 868,945 339 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 63: ARENA 1 -5205 COMPANY 5200: ARENA FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND SALARIES 6110 Regular Employees 178,875 173,200 173,200 157,760 157,760 169,130 169,130 6111 Salary-Parttime 7,965 8,820 8,820 9,750 9,750 10,045 10,045 6112 Salary-Seasonal Temp 68,160 66,470 66,470 69,625 69,625 71,710 71,710 6113 Overtime-Regular 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 6123 Salaries-Other 6,830 6,880 6,880 9,905 9,905 8,605 8,605 6138 Medicare 3,800 3,755 3,755 3,580 3,580 3,765 3,765 6139 FICA 16,235 16,050 16,050 15,315 15,315 16,090 16,090 6141 Pension-PERA 14,710 14,430 14,430 13,305 13,305 14,085 14,085 6142 Worker's Compensation 5,755 6,440 6,440 6,135 6,135 6,585 6,585 6144 Long-term Disability Insurance 510 495 495 460 460 490 490 6145 Hospital&Life Insurance 32,245 31,450 31,450 28,870 28,870 30,790 30,790 6170 Employee Paid Premiums - (5,000) (5,000) (5,000) (5,000) (5,000) (5,000) Total 338,585 326,490 326,490 313,205 313,205 329,795 329,795 6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES Various Office Supplies 250 250 250 150 150 150 150 Total 250 250 250 150 150 150 150 6211 SMALL TOOL&EQUIPMENT Miscellaneous Equipment and Tools 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 Total 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 6212 MOTOR FUELS/OILS Propane 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 Total 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 6214 CHEMICALS Water treatment-Cooling Tower - 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Total - 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS Resurfacers 2,000 2,000 2,000 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 Compressors - - - - - - _ - Total 2,000 2,000 2,000 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES Miscellaneous Supplies 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 13,000 13,000 Total 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 13,000 13,000 6237 TELEPHONE Phone 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,800 2,800 1,800 1,800 Total 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,800 2,800 1,800 1,800 6239 PRINTING/PUBLISHING Ticket Printing,News Ads 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Copier annual maintenance fee 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Total 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 6240 C.SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVAL Trash removal 4,000 4,000 Janitor-Furnished by School Dist 25,000 - - 15,000 15,000 Total 25,000 - - 15,000 15,000 4,000 4,000 6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES Misc Contractual 500 500 500 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 ASCAP 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 CivicRec 1,200 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Total_ _ 2,000 10,800 10,800 16,300 16,300 16,300 16,300 6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC Electric 31,500 31,500 31,500 32,500 40,000 32,500 40,000 Total 31,500 31,500 31,500 32,500 40,000 32,500 40,000 6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS I I I I Natural Gas 16,000 16,000 16,000 14,000 29,000 14,000 29,000 Total 16,000 16,000 16,000 14,000 29,000 14,000 29,000 6257 UTILITIES-OTHER Water and Sewer 16,600 15,500 15,500 17,000 21,000 17,000 21,000 Total 16,600 15,500 15,500 17,000 21,000 17,000 21,000 6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT Copier Maint.agmt&Miscellaneous Repaii 5,500 5,500 5,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 Total 5,500 5,500 5,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6266 REPAIRS-BUILDINGS Miscellaneous Repairs 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,200 5,200 5,200 5,200 Total 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,200 5,200 5,200 5,200 6275 SCHOOL/CONF/EXP-LOCAL I I MN Ice Arena Managers Conf-Manager 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 MN Ice Arena Managers Conf-Foreman 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 Total 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 340 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 63: ARENA 1 -5205 COMPANY 5200: ARENA FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND 6276 SCHOOL/CONF/EXP-OTHER MIAMA Fall conference 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 Total 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 6277 MILEAGE ALLOWANCE Miscellaneous Mileage 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 Total 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 6280 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS I I US Rink Assoc.&Managers Assoc. 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 _ Total 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE Employee ID Jackets,etc. 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Total 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 6310 RENTAL EXPENSE Copier Lease 1,000 I 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Total _ 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6311 INSURANCE General Liability 15,500 17,000 17,000 17,500 17,500 18,000 18,000 Total 15,500 17,000 17,000 17,500 17,500 18,000 18,000 6351 VISA/BANK CHARGES Credit Card Charges 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Total 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6355 ONLINE REGISTRATION FEE Registration Fees 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 Total 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 6399 OTHER CHARGES LOGIS 5,600 5,800 5,800 6,450 6,450 6,800 6,800 Total 5,600 5,800 5,800 6,450 6,450 6,800 6,800 6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE Concessions 8,500 8,500 8,500 6,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 Total 8,500 8,500 8,500 6,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 6610 DEPRECIATION Depreciation 60,900 60,900 60,900 60,900 185,000 60,900 185,000 Total 60,900 60,900 60,900 60,900 _ 185,000 60,900 185,000 6740 CAPITAL OUTLAY-OTHER ITEMS Replace Olympia Batteries 40,000 40,000 Less:School District Share (20,000) (20,000) Exterior Brick Wall Repair 65,500 65,500 Less:School District Share (32,750) (32,750) Replace Interior Wood Doors 10,000 10,000 - - Less:School District Share (5,000) Replace Interor Metal Doors 20,000 20,000 - - Less:School District Share (10,000) Overhead garage door replacement 34,600 34,600 Less:School District Share (17,300) (17,300) Replace exterior alum windows 44,900 44,900 Less:School District Share (22,450) (22,450) Add water heater to resurfacer room 30,000 Less:School District Share (15,000) New Skate Sharpener 20,000 20,000 Less:School District Share (10,000) (10,000) Total _ 15,000 - - 40,000 _ 25,000 92,500 92,500 6915 INTERFUND LOAN PRINCIPAL Inter Fund Loan-Refrigeration Project 68,270 69,055 69,055 69,850 _ 69,850 70,650 70,650 Total 68,270 69,055 69,055 69,850 69,850 70,650 70,650 7016 INTERFUND LOAN INTERST Inter Fund Loan-Refrigeration Project 11,730 10,945 10,945 10,150 10,150 9,350 9,350 Total 11,730 10,945 10,945 10,150 10,150 9,350 9,350 Total Net of Personnel 316,750 288,150 288,150 349,200 481,800 388,550 539,150 TOTAL EXPENSES $ 655,335 $ 614,640 $ 614,640 $ 662,405 $ 795,005 $ 718,345 $ 868,945 341 COMPANY DEPARTMENT BUSINESS UNIT ACTIVITY 5200 64 5260 Arena II DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY The Hayes Park Arena was built in 1995 to supplement the growing needs of the Apple Valley youth boys and girls hockey programs. It is the home of the Apple Valley Hockey Association, Eastview Hockey Association, Apple Valley and Eastview summer training programs, and Eastview High School practices. The hockey associations sponsors several tournaments and hosts playoff games which bring in teams from all over the state. Not only does this benefit the arena but also local merchants in the area. The spring of 1996 through the spring of 2021 Hayes Arena converted from ice to turf rentals for two months per year to serve non-ice sports in Apple Valley. Beginning in 2022 Hayes Arena no longer installs turf in the spring and is a year round ice facility. MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2023 & 2024 Continue to create and foster a diverse, inclusive and welcoming facility for all staff, customers and the public. We have a very diverse population in Apple Valley and we need to continue working at doing better job reflecting that in our facilities. Host and organize spring and summer weekend hockey tournaments. With the addition of year round ice to Hayes Arena we need to get creative to fill as much of our ice as we can. The spring and summer tournaments will help us fill weekend ice times that are traditionally unused while bringing in skaters and their families to our community. Partner with local AAA traveling programs to fill spring ice. These programs are essential to arenas during the spring months when the traditional hockey season is over. Improve our preventative maintenance program. This program has to be a top priority in order to avoid costly breakdowns and to keep our staff and users safe inside of our building. Our facility is aging and it is extremely important to continuously improve our program to keep the building performing at a high level. 342 IMPACT MEASURES / PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Item Actual Actual Actual Projected Projected Projected 1 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Hours Ice Time Rented 1,630 1,180 1,450 1,850 2,100 2,200 Hours Dry Floor Time Rented 305 165 Regular Status Personnel Schedule — FTE's Actual Actual Actual Proposed Proposed Proposed Position Title 2018 2019 2020 2022 2023 2024 Working Foreman .25 .25 .25 .25 .25 .25 Pooled Park Maintenance .05 .18 Total .25 .30 .44 .25 .25 .25 Temporary Status Personnel Schedule — (Part-Time hours) Actual Actual Actual Proposed Proposed Proposed Position Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Facility Assistant 666 498 539 600 650 650 Ice Guard Concessions 381 271 11 1436 500 500 Ice Resurfacer Driver 2,150 1,728 3,188 1,500 2,100 2,100 Instructor I 38 78 300 150 150 Instructor II 221 150 150 Rec Program Dir/Assistant 100 100 100 Total 3,234 2,497 4,178 3,000 3,650 3,650 343 Summary Budget Department 64 Business Unit#5260 Hayes Arena II 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Proposed Proposed Proposed Revenue: 4810/4812 Ice Revenue 320,893 209,551 267,652 335,100 335,200 380,100 390,100 4823 Turf Revenue 16,744 - 4,845 40,000 40,000 - - 4811/4816/4814/4815 Sales/Concessions 5,992 837 927 15,050 15,050 7,100 5,100 4819 Advertising Revenue 3,600 1,200 2,800 6,000 6,000 4,000 4,000 4899 Other 7,844 7,844 4,050 2,000 2,000 - - 355,073 219,432 280,274 398,150 398,250 391,200 399,200 Expenditures: Salaries&Wages 46,566 45,250 63,820 50,900 65,750 75,520 79,460 Employee Benefits 7,031 6,801 8,670 7,635 9,775 10,930 11,565 Supplies 5,432 8,176 10,162 11,750 11,750 12,200 12,200 Contractual Services 8,491 6,482 7,243 3,900 3,900 4,300 4,600 Utilities 80,971 84,952 96,281 83,000 83,000 103,000 103,000 Repairs&Maintenance 16,749 28,283 15,390 26,000 26,000 26,000 26,000 Training/Travel/Dues 315 315 365 800 800 800 800 Insurance&Other Expenses 12,066 12,361 13,059 13,400 13,400 14,700 15,300 Items for Resale 4,298 3,654 - 7,000 6,000 6,000 3,000 Depreciation 104,809 116,799 128,420 91,200 91,200 130,000 130,000 Capital Outlay(not capitalized) - - 25,926 30,000 190,000 75,000 65,500 Total Exp 286,728 313,073 369,336 325,585 501,575 458,450 451,425 Operating Income(loss) 68,345 (93,641) (89,062) 72,565 (103,325) (67,250) (52,225) Other Income(Expense): Property Tax Levy 121,000 121,000 121,000 41,000 41,000 41,000 41,000 Net Income(Loss) 189,345 27,359 31,938 113,565 (62,325) (26,250) (11,225) Change in Cash: Add Depreciation: 104,809 104,809 104,809 91,200 91,200 130,000 130,000 Less: Capital Outlay(not above) (260,769) (24,986) (154,930) - - - - Net Increase(decrease)in Cash 33,385 107,182 (18,183) 204,765 28,875 103,750 118,775 2023 CAPITAL OUTLAY Door Replacements 45,000 Sound System Replacement 30,000 75,000 2024 CAPITAL OUTLAY Replace SW Overhead garage door 7,500 Overhead Olympia door replacement 33,000 Compressor Replacement 25,000 65,500 City of Apple Valley 344 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) ARENA II 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6110-SALARY-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 2,861 10,903 659 2,485 22,230 2,560 17,155 17,155 19,875 19,875 6111-SALARY PART-TIME 7,959 6,375 6,577 7,970 7,560 3,120 8,450 8,450 8,705 8,705 6112-SALARY-SEASONAL TEMP 35,669 27,972 56,157 40,165 35,010 20,123 47,550 47,550 48,975 48,975 6113-OVERTIME-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 77 0 0 0 6114-OVERTIME PART-TIME EMPLOYEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 6123-SALARY-OTHER 0 0 0 280 950 0 2,365 2,365 1,905 1,905 6124-OVERTIME-SEASONAL TEMP 0 0 427 0 6105-SALARIES AND WAGES 46,566 45,250 63,820 50,900 65,750 25,803 75,520 75,520 79,460 79,460 6105-SALARIES AND WAGES 0 0 0 0 6138-MEDICARE 673 647 925 740 950 374 1,095 1,095 1,150 1,150 6139-FICA 2,877 2,768 3,956 3,160 4,075 1,599 4,680 4,680 4,925 4,925 6141-PENSIONS-PERA 2,301 2,142 2,521 2,165 2,300 1,101 2,100 2,100 2,285 2,285 6142-WORKERS COMPENSATION 1,180 1,243 2,268 1,570 2,450 1,039 3,055 3,055 3,205 3,205 6125-EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 7,031 6,801 9,670 7,635 9,775 4,114 10,930 10,930 11,565 11,565 6125-EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 0 0 0 0 6100-TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 53,597 52,050 73,490 58,535 75,525 29,918 86,450 86,450 91,025 91,025 6100-TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 0 0 0 0 6210-OFFICE SUPPLIES 0 0 0 150 150 0 100 100 100 100 6211-SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT 281 536 111 1,000 1,000 117 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6212-MOTOR FUELS/OILS 0 0 0 100 100 60 100 100 100 100 6214-CHEMICALS 0 1,979 2,400 500 500 2,895 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 6215-EQUIPMENT-PARTS 1,004 209 46 1,500 1,500 107 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 6216-VEHICLES-TIRES/BATTERIES 0 0 442 0 6229-GENERAL SUPPLIES 4,147 5,453 7,163 8,500 8,500 2,286 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 6205-SUPPLIES 5,432 8,176 10,162 11,750 11,750 5,465 12,200 12,200 12,200 12,200 6237-TELEPHONE/PAGERS 1,222 1,226 1,145 1,200 1,200 512 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 6239-PRINTING 0 0 0 100 100 0 100 100 100 100 6240-CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE 2,902 1,368 1,304 2,100 2,100 808 2,400 2,400 2,700 2,700 6249-OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,367 3,888 4,793 500 500 2,380 500 500 500 500 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 8,491 6,482 7,243 3,900 3,900 3,700 4,300 4,300 4,600 4,600 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0 0 0 0 6255-UTILITIES-ELECTRIC 56,780 60,938 64,169 57,000 57,000 33,339 60,000 65,000 60,000 65,000 6256-UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS 17,908 18,021 24,050 20,000 20,000 21,100 23,000 30,000 21,000 30,000 6257-UTILITIES-PROPANE/WATER/SEWER 6,283 5,993 8,061 6,000 6,000 3,460 7,000 8,000 7,000 8,000 6250-UTILITIES 80,971 84,952 96,281 83,000 83,000 57,899 90,000 103,000 88,000 103,000 6265-REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 4,432 1,728 1,177 6,000 6,000 91 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6266-REPAIRS-BUILDING 12,317 26,555 14,213 20,000 20,000 4,788 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 6260-REPAIRS AND MAINTENA 16,749 28,283 15,390 26,000 26,000 4,879 26,000 26,000 26,000 26,000 6275-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL 0 0 0 100 100 0 100 100 100 100 6277-MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE 100 100 100 100 100 100 6280-DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 315 315 365 345 6281-UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 0 0 0 600 600 0 600 600 600 600 6270-TRNG/TRAVL/DUES/UNIF 315 315 365 800 800 345 800 800 800 800 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 111,957 128,208 129,440 125,450 125,450 72,288 133,300 146,300 131,600 146,600 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 0 0 0 0 6310-RENTAL EXPENSE 0 0 0 300 300 0 300 300 300 300 6311-INSURANCE-PROPERTY/LIABILITY 12,075 12,400 13,100 13,100 13,100 5,458 14,400 14,400 15,000 15,000 6333-GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS -9 -39 -41 -19 6399-OTHER CHARGES 0 0 43 0 City of Apple Valley 345 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) ARENA II 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6399-OTHER CHARGES -43 0 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES 12,066 12,361 13,102 13,400 13,400 5,440 14,700 14,700 15,300 15,300 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES -43 0 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES 12,066 12,361 13,102 13,400 13,400 5,440 14,700 14,700 15,300 15,300 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES -43 0 6540-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE 4,298 3,654 0 7,000 6,000 0 6,000 6,000 3,000 3,000 6501-TAXABLE/NON-TAXABLE MISC RESAL 4,298 3,654 0 7,000 6,000 0 6,000 6,000 3,000 3,000 6501-TAXABLE/NON-TAXABLE MISC RESAL 0 0 0 0 6500-TOTAL EXPENDITURES 4,298 3,654 0 7,000 6,000 0 6,000 6,000 3,000 3,000 6500-TOTAL EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 6610-DEPRECIATION 104,809 116,799 128,420 91,200 91,200 54,218 91,200 130,000 91,200 130,000 6601-TOTAL DEPRECIATION 104,809 116,799 128,420 91,200 91,200 54,218 91,200 130,000 91,200 130,000 6600-TOTAL DEPRECIATION 104,809 116,799 128,420 91,200 91,200 54,218 91,200 130,000 91,200 130,000 6735-CAPITAL OUTLAY-OTHER IMPROVEME 24,376 0 6740-CAPITAL OUTLAY-MACH/EQ/OTHER 0 0 1,550 30,000 190,000 0 184,000 75,000 505,500 65,500 6701-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 0 0 25,926 30,000 190,000 0 184,000 75,000 505,500 65,500 6700-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 0 0 25,926 30,000 190,000 0 184,000 75,000 505,500 65,500 6901-TOTAL DEBT SERVICE 0 0 0 0 6900-TOTAL DEBT SERVICE 0 0 0 0 7001-TOTAL INTEREST AND FISCAL FEES 0 0 0 0 7000-TOTAL INTEREST AND FISCAL FEES 0 0 0 0 286,727 313,073 370,336 325,585 501,575 161,863 515,650 458,450 837,625 451,425 346 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 64: ARENA II-5260 COMPANY: ARENA 5200 JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMENC PROP RECOMMENC SALARIES 6110 Regular Employees 2,485 22,230 22,230 17,155 17,155 19,875 19,875 6111 Salary-Parttime 7,970 7,560 7,560 8,450 8,450 8,705 8,705 6112 Salary-Seasonal Temp 40,165 35,010 35,010 47,550 47,550 48,975 48,975 6114 Overtime-Temp - - - - - - - 6123 Salaries-Other 280 950 950 2,365 2,365 1,905 1,905 6138 Medicare 740 950 950 1,095 1,095 1,150 1,150 6139 FICA 3,160 4,075 4,075 4,680 4,680 4,925 4,925 6141 Pension-PERA 2,165 2,300 2,300 2,100 2,100 2,285 2,285 6142 Worker's Compensation 1,570 2,450 2,450 3,055 3,055 3,205 3,205 Total 58,535 75,525 75,525 86,450 86,450 91,025 91,025 6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES Miscellaneous 150 150 150 100 100 100 100 Total 150 150 150 100 100 100 100 6211 SMALL TOOL&EQUIPMENT Miscellaneous 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Total 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 6212 MOTOR FUELS/OILS Propane 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 6214 CHEMICALS Water Treatment-Cooling Tower 500 500 500 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Total 500 500 500 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS Miscellaneous 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 Total 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES Miscellaneous 8,500 8,500 8,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 Total 8,500 8,500 8,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 6237 TELEPHONE Phone 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 Total 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 6239 PRINTING/PUBLISHING Ticket Printing,News Ads 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 6240 C.SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVAL 2,100 2,100 2,100 2,400 2,400 2,700 2,700 Total 2,100 2,100 2,100 2,400 2,400 2,700 2,700 6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES Miscellaneous/Software Fees 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 Total 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC 57,000 57,000 57,000 60,000 65,000 60,000 65,000 Total 57,000 57,000 57,000 60,000 65,000 60,000 65,000 6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS 20,000 20,000 20,000 23,000 30,000 21,000 30,000 Total 20,000 20,000 20,000 23,000 30,000 21,000 30,000 6257 UTILITIES-OTHER Water and Sewer 6,000 6,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 7,000 8,000 Total 6,000 6,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 7,000 8,000 6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 Total 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6266 REPAIRS-BUILDINGS 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 Total 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 347 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 64: ARENA II-5260 COMPANY: ARENA 5200 JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMENC PROP RECOMMENC 6275 SCHOOL/CONF/EXP-LOCAL MN Ice Arena Managers Conference _ 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Total _ 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 6277 MILEAGE ALLOWANCE Miscellaneous Mileage 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE Employee ID Jackets,etc. 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 Total 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 6310 RENTAL EXPENSE Various Equipment 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 Total 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 6311 INSURANCE General Liability 13,100 13,100 13,100 14,400 14,400 15,000 15,000 Total _ 13,100 13,100 13,100 14,400 14,400 15,000 15,000 6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE Concessions 7,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 3,000 3,000 Total 7,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 3,000 3,000 6610 DEPRECIATION 91,200 91,200 91,200 91,200 130,000 91,200 130,000 Total 91,200 91,200 91,200 91,200 130,000 91,200 130,000 6740 CAPITAL OUTLAY-OTHER ITEMS SW Overhead Garage replacement 7,500 7,500 Overhead Olympia Garage Replace 33,000 33,000 Concrete Floor 109,000 - Replace Belachers 40,000 - Door Replacements 45,000 45,000 Compressor Replacement 25,000 25,000 Acccess Road to Resurfacer Room 50,000 50,000 Refrgeration Replacement(to 2024) 400,000 - Sound System Replacement 30,000 30,000 Replace Sound System 30,000 Replace Rubber Flooring 140,000 140,000 _ Total 30,000 190,000 190,000 184,000 75,000 505,500 65,500 Total Net of Personnel 267,050 426,050 426,050 429,200 372,000 746,600 360,400 TOTAL EXPENSES $ 325,585 $ 501,575 $ 501,575 $ 515,650 $ 458,450 $ 837,625 $ 451,425 348 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 ARENA BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT: ARENA REVENUES COMPANY: ARENA 5200 JDE 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL COUNCIL COUNCIL DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND ARENA I 4810 Public Skating 1,153 - 331 2,600 2,000 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 4811 Skate Sharpening 270 - 15 1,000 1,000 500 500 500 500 4812/4821 Ice Rental 156,707 103,417 114,790 170,000 175,000 180,000 180,000 190,000 190,000 4813 Skate Instructions 33,678 11,838 28,389 30,000 32,000 34,000 34,000 34,000 34,000 4814 Concessions&Commissions 10,510 2,485 3,716 17,000 15,000 4,000 15,000 4,000 4,000 4815 Skate Rental 644 - 123 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 4816 Merchandise Sales 75 - 9 4817 Tennis Rentals - - - - 4818 Tennis Instructions - - - 4820 School Share of Expense 194,134 199,083 211,773 200,000 205,000 210,000 217,000 221,000 224,000 4820 School Share of Refrigeration 1,084,354 4823 Turf Rentals - - - 4824 Arena Court Rentals/Dry Floor Rental - 70 3,361 5,000 5,000 8,500 8,500 8,500 8,500 4899 Other - - - 12,000 - - - - - 4358 Vending Commissions - - - 5340 Refunds and Reimbursements - - - Total 1,481,525 316,893 362,507 438,600 436,000 440,500 458,500 461,500 464,500 ARENA II 4810 Public Skating 33 - - 100 100 100 100 100 100 4811 Skate Sharpening 440 60 - 450 600 600 600 600 600 4812/4821 Ice Rental 320,735 209,551 267,652 335,000 335,100 380,000 380,000 390,000 390,000 4813 Skate Instructions 125 - - 4814 Concessions&Commissions 5,308 609 927 6,000 13,950 6,000 6,000 4,000 4,000 4815 Skate Rental 76 - - 4816 Merchandise Sales 168 168 - 500 500 500 500 500 500 4817/4823 Dry Floor Rentals 16,744 - 4,845 20,000 40,000 - - - - 4819 Advertising Revenue 3,600 1,200 2,800 6,000 6,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 Skate Park rental - - - 4358 Vending Commissions - - - 5340 Refunds and Reimbursements 3,154 3,154 - 4899 Other Rental 4,690 4,690 4,050 2,000 2,000 Total 355,073 219,432 280,274 370,050 398,250 391,200 391,200 399,200 399,200 REVENUE RECAP - 135,641 Ice Revenue 512,431 324,806 411,162 537,700 544,200 596,600 596,600 616,600 616,600 School Share of Exp 1,278,488 199,083 211,773 200,000 205,000 210,000 217,000 221,000 224,000 Tennis Revenue - - - - - - - - Dry Floor Rentals 20,344 1,200 7,645 26,000 46,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 Merch Sales&Concessions 17,491 3,322 4,790 25,950 32,050 12,600 23,600 10,600 10,600 Arena Court Rentals - 70 3,361 5,000 5,000 8,500 8,500 8,500 8,500 Skate Park Revenue - - - - - - - - Other 7,844 7,844 4,050 14,000 2,000 - - - - Vending Commissions Total Operating Revenue 1,836,598 536,325 642,781 808,650 834,250 831,700 849,700 860,700 863,700 REVENUE RECAP (by Arena-I) Ice Revenue 191,538 115,255 143,510 202,600 209,000 216,500 216,500 220,000 220,000 School Share of Exp 194,134 199,083 211,773 200,000 205,000 210,000 217,000 221,000 224,000 Tennis Revenue - - - - - - - - Dry Floor - - - - - - - - Merch Sales&Concessions 11,499 2,485 3,863 19,000 17,000 5,500 16,500 10,000 10,000 Arena Court Rentals - 70 3,361 5,000 5,000 8,500 8,500 8,500 8,500 Skate Park Revenue - - - - - - - - Other - - - 12,000 - - - - - Total Operating Revenue 397,171 316,893 362,507 438,600 436,000 440,500 458,500 459,500 462,500 1,084,354 - - 1 - - - - 2,000 2,000 REVENUE RECAP (by Arena-II) Ice Revenue 320,893 209,551 267,652 335,100 335,200 380,100 380,100 390,100 390,100 School Share of Exp - - - - - - - - - Tennis Revenue - - - - - - - - - Dry Floor 16,744 - 4,845 20,000 40,000 - - - - Merch Sales&Concessions 5,992 837 927 6,950 15,050 7,100 7,100 5,100 5,100 Advertising Rev 3,600 1,200 2,800 6,000 6,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 Skate Park Revenue - - - - - - - - - Other 7,844 7,844 4,050 2,000 2,000 - - - - Total Operating Revenue 355,073 219,432 280,274 370,050 398,250 391,200 391,200 399,200 399,200 349 COMPANY DEPARTMENT BUSINESS UNIT ACTIVITY 5300 65 5305 WATER OPERATIONS Public Works DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY The Public Works Water Utility Division is responsible for providing residents and businesses in the City with high quality, safe, and reliable drinking water. Water from 16 municipal wells is pumped to a central water treatment plant. The water plant removes iron and manganese from the well water and has a capacity to treat 24 million gallons per day. Treated water is then pumped into the water distribution system consisting of 250 miles of water main pipe and five reservoirs with a total storage capacity of 12.7 million gallons. Average daily consumption is 6.8 million gallons. SERVICE CATEGORIES The Water Utility Division produces and delivers potable water to over 55,000 customers within the City of Apple Valley. Public water supply operations are highly regulated by the Federal Safe Drinking Water Act, administered locally by the Minnesota Department of Health and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. The following services are provided within this division. 1. Water Supply and Distribution Services • Supply an average of 2.0 billion gallons of potable water to residents and businesses within Apple Valley each year • Operate and maintain 20 high capacity municipal wells ranging in depths of 490 to 1,100 feet below ground in the Jordan, Mt. Simon-Hinckley and Prairie Du Chien-Jordan aquifers • Perform maintenance and flushing of over 2,400 public water hydrants and approximately 285 private hydrants to preserve water quality and provide water for fire protection throughout the Apple Valley • Inspect and maintain water storage reservoirs, including rehabilitation of interior and exterior surface coatings • Perform leak detection, repair damaged valves and repair water main breaks that occur in the distribution system • Provide for water meter reading and maintenance of over 15,000 water meters 2. Water Treatment Plant Services • Operate and maintain the City's water treatment plant to remove elevated levels of iron and manganese, minerals naturally occurring in groundwater • Provide central system of chlorinating/disinfecting the water supply system to maintain public health standards • Provide central system of adding fluoride to drinking water to prevent tooth decay in compliance with State requirements 350 3. Water System Testing and Security Services ■ Monitor water system for disinfection by performing sampling and testing for total coliform bacteria and chlorine residual at 60 sites throughout the community on a monthly basis in compliance with Department of Health requirements. ■ Perform testing, through the Department of Health, to monitor potential contaminants in compliance with Federal Primary Drinking Water Standards. ■ Provide frequent site inspections and continuously monitor operations and security of the water supply system through the SCADA computer and facility security systems MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2023 • Maintain compliance with Federal and State mandates for drinking water quality. • Maintenance on Well's 5, 10, 15 and WTP HZP 1 • Wash and inspect Nordic Reservoir • Intermediate Rehab Palomino Reservoir • Extend fiber to well sites. MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2024 • Maintain compliance with Federal and State mandates for drinking water quality. • Maintenance on Well's 12, 3 and WTP LZP 2. • SCADA System Upgrades IMPACT MEASURES / PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual Actual Actual Projected Projected Projected Item 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Number of Gallons Supplied (in billions of gallons)* 1.9 1.96 2.56 2.1 2.1 2.1 Water Main Leaks/Breaks 10 7 7 8 8 8 MDH Water Quality Tests Failing to Meet Standards** 0 0 0 0 0 0 *Annual water demand is highly dependent of precipitation and weather conditions for a given year **Field Testing conducted by the Minnesota Department of Health for Primary Drinking Water Standards Regular Status Personnel Schedule— FTE's Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Proposed Position Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Public Works Supt. 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Public Works Supervisor 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Department Specialist 0 0 0 0 0 0 GIS/Asset Man. Tech. 1 1 1 1 1 1 Utilities Accountant 1 1 1 1 1 1 Utilities Foreman 2 2 2 2 2 2 Technical Specialist 1 1 1 1 1 1 Maintenance I/II 4 5 5 5 5 5 GIS Coordinator—(FT split 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 with 1510, 5365, 5505) 351 Temporary Status Personnel Schedule- Hours Adopted Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Position Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Seasonal 1,750 1,840 1,840 1,600 1,600 1,800 Summary Budget Department Water Operation 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Revenue: 4910/4912 Utility Charges 4,678,426 5,307,263 6,145,719 5,851,000 6,141,000 6,501,000 6,821,000 5010/5013 Investment Earnings 50% 53,183 59,231 (12,325) 54,000 63,000 63,000 63,000 4920/4921/4997/4999 Shared Rev w/Swr 61,437 40,334 58,698 - - - 5045/5055/5058 Assessment 78,850 44,966 67,261 - - - - 4110/4913/5323/5399 Other Revenue 19,355 27,322 7,349 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 Total 4,891,251 5,479,116 6,266,702 5,980,000 6,279,000 6,639,000 6,959,000 Expenditures: Salaries&Wages 798,546 739,546 743,290 843,035 901,370 973,065 1,019,440 Employee Benefits 327,128 254,585 270,279 334,475 317,395 344,635 365,110 Supplies 150,684 159,606 145,696 185,310 198,550 239,350 271,450 Contractual Services 167,158 187,178 266,982 345,435 226,400 316,475 274,400 Utilities 349,681 401,895 444,102 393,800 398,800 433,800 462,000 Repairs&Maintenance 247,120 128,294 95,458 252,250 253,450 236,500 243,000 Training/Travel/Dues 29,844 23,673 21,819 35,145 39,870 45,760 52,630 Other Expenses 248,217 246,634 344,965 402,140 346,250 357,975 365,425 Tax/Non-Tax Resale 5,882 31,068 22,940 30,000 15,000 40,000 45,000 Depreciation 1,524,535 1,686,463 1,826,022 1,667,000 1,707,000 1,800,000 1,900,000 VISA/MC Charges 23,296 28,567 36,898 32,000 32,500 33,000 37,000 Debt Service-Interest 246,021 282,718 106,917 271,630 250,500 227,740 204,480 Debt Service-Principal - - - 844,600 867,540 885,835 914,530 Bond Issuance Expense - - 57,809 - - - - Transfers/Admin Fee to GF 581,670 585,000 602,600 602,600 623,000 641,500 673,000 Transfers to Other Funds(Road Fund) - - - - - - - Capital Outlay-Non Capitalized 22,536 69,318 18,169 1,712,000 1,555,300 1,376,000 1,610,700 Total Exp 4,722,319 4,824,545 5,003,946 7,951,420 7,732,925 7,951,635 8,438,165 Net Income 168,932 654,571 1,262,756 (1,971,420) (1,453,925) (1,312,635) (1,479,165) Net change in cash-update Add Depreciation 1,524,535 1,686,463 1,826,022 1,667,000 1,707,000 1,800,000 1,900,000 Debt Service-Principal not above (395,000) (821,670) (6,789,598) - - - - Capital Outlay Not above(capitalized) (3,739,848) (3,010,877) (1,212,740) - - - - Bonds Issued 3,620,059 - 6,215,000 - - - - 1,178,678 (1,491,513) 1,301,440 (304,420) 253,075 487,365 420,835 352 2023 Capital Outlay 6730 VEHICLES: 1 Ton Utility Dump Truck (w/Sewer) $ 45,000 $ 45,000 6735 OTHER IMPROVEMENTS: Well Maintenance & Rehab - Wells 5, 10 & 15 $ 150,000 WTP Pump Maintenance - HZP1 $ 16,000 Palomino Intermediate Rehab $ 185,000 Fiber to well's (equipment upgrades for fiber) $ 75,000 Fiber Extension $ 40,000 Gate Valve Replacement $ 30,000 Water Break Street Patching $ 100,000 Nordic Reservoir Wash & Inspect $ 10,000 Replace Valve Backwash Tank B $ 15,000 HZP Add VFD $ 70,000 Install GV CR42/Granada & CR42 / Dundee $ 50,000 142nd St. (Cedar to Galaxie) $ 50,000 AV 3rd Walnut Ln (Elm Dr. - Park Ln) Edgewood Ln, Park Ln $ 540,000 $ 1,331,000 Total Capital Outlay $ 1,376,000 2024 Capital Outlay 6730 VEHICLES: Replace 411 - 3/4 Ton Vehicle Ext. Cab $ 48,700 $ 48,700 6735 OTHER IMPROVEMENTS: Well Maintenance and Rehab — No. 12, 3 $ 120,000 WTP Maintenance Low Zone Pump 2 $ 25,000 Wash and Inspect Valleywood Reservoir $ 12,000 SCADA Upgrade $ 300,000 Backwash Tank A Maintenance $ 15,000 Water Conservation Grant Program $ 10,000 Anodes for Longridge and Harwell $ 150,000 Fiber Extension $ 40,000 Gate Valve Replacement $ 40,000 Water Break Street Patching $ 100,000 Whitney Dr. — Garden View to Redwood $ 100,000 Greenleaf 4th Addition Phase 1 $ 650,000 Subtotal $ 1,562,000 Total Capital Outlay $ 1,610,700 353 Debt Schedule: CITY OF APPLE VALLEY WATER UTILITY Debt Service Requirements GO Rev.Bonds 2014 GO Rev.Bonds 2018 Total Total (Water Meter Replacement) Annual Year Principal Interest Principal Interest Year Principal Interest 2015 365,000 215,125 - - 2015 365,000 215,125 580,125 2016 370,000 207,825 - - 2016 370,000 207,825 577,825 2017 380,000 200,425 - - 2017 380,000 200,425 580,425 2018 385,000 192,825 - - 2018 385,000 192,825 577,825 2019 395,000 185,125 - 64,446 2019 395,000 249,571 644,571 2020 400,000 177,225 421,670 115,330 2020 821,670 292,555 1,114,225 2021 410,000 169,225 434,598 102,402 2021 844,598 271,627 1,116,225 2022 420,000 161,025 447,536 89,464 2022 867,536 250,489 1,118,025 2023 425,000 151,575 460,836 76,164 2023 885,836 227,739 1,113,575 2024 440,000 142,013 474,531 62,469 2024 914,531 204,482 1,119,013 2025 450,000 131,013 488,633 48,367 2025 938,633 179,380 1,118,013 2026 460,000 119,763 503,154 33,846 2026 963,154 153,609 1,116,763 2027 475,000 107,113 518,106 18,894 2027 993,106 126,006 1,119,113 2028 485,000 94,050 250,936 3,701 2028 735,936 97,751 833,687 2029 500,000 79,500 - - 2029 500,000 79,500 579,500 2030 515,000 64,500 - - 2030 515,000 64,500 579,500 2031 530,000 49,050 2031 530,000 49,050 579,050 2032 545,000 33,150 2032 545,000 33,150 578,150 2033 560,000 16,800 2033 560,000 16,800 576,800 City of Apple Valley 354 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) WATER OPERATIONS 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6110-SALARY-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 684,756 713,076 665,511 737,795 787,800 369,479 835,450 835,450 873,175 873,175 6111-SALARY PART-TIME 21,190 21,190 22,230 22,230 6112-SALARY-SEASONAL TEMP 56,193 30,032 23,730 24,600 24,800 14,677 25,600 25,600 29,700 29,700 6113-OVERTIME-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 71,582 48,715 67,298 56,300 57,700 30,630 59,400 59,400 61,000 61,000 6118-VACATION PAY 9,430 -39,574 -2,887 0 6119-ANNUAL LEAVE 743 0 6121-INSURANCE CASH BENEFIT 2,040 2,760 3,120 2,700 6122-COMP REQUEST -25,456 -15,464 -14,226 -13,140 6123-SALARY-OTHER 0 0 0 24,340 31,070 0 31,425 31,425 33,335 33,335 6105-SALARIES AND WAGES 798,546 739,546 743,290 843,035 901,370 404,347 973,065 973,065 1,019,440 1,019,440 6138-MEDICARE 10,986 10,886 10,456 12,225 12,880 5,676 14,110 14,110 14,780 14,780 6139-FICA 46,981 46,276 44,707 52,270 55,080 24,270 60,330 60,330 63,205 63,205 6141-PENSIONS-PERA 56,139 53,923 52,047 61,380 64,770 29,183 71,060 71,060 74,230 74,230 6142-WORKERS COMPENSATION 31,447 17,307 23,507 26,700 29,250 12,984 34,290 34,290 37,740 37,740 6144-LONG-TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE 1,379 1,285 1,070 2,320 2,215 419 2,385 2,385 2,495 2,495 6145-MEDICAL INSURANCE 189,513 143,685 163,487 179,580 175,200 56,876 184,860 184,860 195,060 195,060 6146-DENTAL INSURANCE 10,691 9,544 9,292 4,325 6147-LIFE INSURANCE-BASIC 57 56 60 79 6148-LIFE INSURANCE-SUPP/DEPEND 2,079 2,176 3,017 1,253 6170-EMPLOYEE PAID PREMIUMS -22,144 -30,553 -37,364 -22,000 -5,837 -22,400 -22,400 -22,400 -22,400 6125-EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 327,128 254,585 270,279 334,475 317,395 129,227 344,635 344,635 365,110 365,110 6100-TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 1,125,673 994,130 1,013,569 1,177,510 1,218,765 533,574 1,317,700 1,317,700 1,384,550 1,384,550 6210-OFFICE SUPPLIES 321 286 676 800 1,250 38 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 6211-SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT 24,452 22,441 30,363 30,310 38,100 23,256 39,600 39,600 57,500 57,500 6212-MOTOR FUELS/OILS 17,575 14,350 22,007 19,625 20,400 7,721 27,050 27,050 27,950 27,950 6214-CHEMICALS 27,746 34,057 45,096 38,000 41,600 19,482 73,500 73,500 84,000 84,000 6215-EQUIPMENT-PARTS 57,591 72,047 25,518 70,600 71,000 12,970 71,000 71,000 73,000 73,000 6216-VEHICLES-TIRES/BATTERIES 1,576 1,003 1,109 3,875 3,900 241 3,900 3,900 3,700 3,700 6229-GENERAL SUPPLIES 21,422 15,423 20,927 22,100 22,300 11,304 23,050 23,050 24,050 24,050 6205-SUPPLIES 150,684 159,606 145,696 185,310 198,550 75,013 239,350 239,350 271,450 271,450 6234-CITY ENGINEER CONSULTANT SERV -2,943 692 4,622 0 6235-CONSULTANT SERVICES 30,701 54,763 114,896 101,275 85,750 25,906 105,950 146,950 93,750 93,750 6237-TELEPHONE/PAGERS 22,875 23,928 18,898 24,400 16,300 10,070 16,500 16,500 18,000 18,000 6238-POSTAGE/UPS/FEDEX 26,002 14,377 15,421 39,700 13,800 7,119 15,850 15,850 18,800 18,800 6239-PRINTING 11,271 2,424 2,268 6,375 7,375 0 5,200 5,200 5,200 5,200 6240-CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE 659 1,555 621 6,000 4,900 0 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 6249-OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 78,594 89,440 110,254 167,685 98,275 20,382 128,975 128,975 146,450 135,650 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 167,158 187,178 266,982 345,435 226,400 63,478 275,475 316,475 285,200 274,400 6255-UTILITIES-ELECTRIC 312,687 365,502 418,123 355,000 360,000 164,924 400,000 400,000 425,000 425,000 6256-UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS 35,305 32,858 24,093 37,000 37,000 20,203 32,000 32,000 35,000 35,000 6257-UTILITIES-PROPANE/VVATER/SEWER 1,688 3,535 1,887 1,800 1,800 165 1,800 1,800 2,000 2,000 6250-UTILITIES 349,681 401,895 444,102 393,800 398,800 185,292 433,800 433,800 462,000 462,000 6265-REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 94,717 20,911 15,100 117,250 117,950 5,388 108,000 108,000 109,500 109,500 6266-REPAIRS-BUILDING 18,755 26,214 19,491 20,000 20,000 43,828 20,500 20,500 22,000 22,000 6269-REPAIRS-OTHER 133,649 81,168 60,867 115,000 115,500 53,723 108,000 108,000 111,500 111,500 6260-REPAIRS AND MAINTENA 247,120 128,294 95,458 252,250 253,450 102,939 236,500 236,500 243,000 243,000 6275-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL 3,207 1,758 3,872 8,205 9,250 1,699 13,100 13,100 17,800 17,800 6276-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP OTHER 5,946 0 1,362 1,200 3,700 1,393 2,700 2,700 4,300 4,300 6277-MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE 1,731 0 0 875 875 0 875 875 500 500 6278-SUBSISTENCE ALLOWANCE 1,125 200 190 850 1,100 204 1,100 1,100 1,200 1,200 6280-DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 13,289 17,715 13,163 19,215 20,145 9,987 22,985 22,985 23,730 23,730 City of Apple Valley 355 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) WATER OPERATIONS 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6281-UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 4,546 4,001 3,232 4,800 4,800 1,399 5,000 5,000 5,100 5,100 6270-TRNG/TRAVL/DUES/UNIF 29,844 23,673 21,819 35,145 39,870 14,682 45,760 45,760 52,630 52,630 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 944,487 900,646 974,058 1,211,940 1,117,070 441,403 1,230,885 1,271,885 1,314,280 1,303,480 6310-RENTAL EXPENSE 1,125 1,430 1,132 2,350 2,350 1,100 2,125 2,125 2,175 2,175 6311-INSURANCE-PROPERTY/LIABILITY 115,000 118,500 152,200 152,200 160,000 66,667 165,000 165,000 167,000 167,000 6333-GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS -428 -4,851 -401 -1,114 6351-VISA/BANK CHARGES 23,296 28,567 36,898 32,000 32,500 16,237 33,000 33,000 37,000 37,000 6399-OTHER CHARGES 132,521 131,555 192,034 247,590 183,900 135,015 190,850 190,850 196,250 196,250 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES 271,514 275,201 381,863 434,140 378,750 217,905 390,975 390,975 402,425 402,425 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES 271,514 275,201 381,863 434,140 378,750 217,905 390,975 390,975 402,425 402,425 6401-EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 6400-TOTAL EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 6540-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE 5,882 11,092 13,348 30,000 15,000 10,802 40,000 40,000 45,000 45,000 6545-NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE 0 19,976 9,592 9,382 6501-TAXABLE/NON-TAXABLE MISC RESAL 5,882 31,068 22,940 30,000 15,000 20,184 40,000 40,000 45,000 45,000 6500-TOTAL EXPENDITURES 5,882 31,068 22,940 30,000 15,000 20,184 40,000 40,000 45,000 45,000 6610-DEPRECIATION 1,524,535 1,686,463 1,826,022 1,667,000 1,707,000 442,667 1,800,000 1,800,000 1,900,000 1,900,000 6601-TOTAL DEPRECIATION 1,524,535 1,686,463 1,826,022 1,667,000 1,707,000 442,667 1,800,000 1,800,000 1,900,000 1,900,000 6600-TOTAL DEPRECIATION 1,524,535 1,686,463 1,826,022 1,667,000 1,707,000 442,667 1,800,000 1,800,000 1,900,000 1,900,000 6730-CAPITAL OUTLAY-TRANSPORTATION 0 4,767 1,750 0 106,800 5,997 45,000 45,000 48,700 48,700 6735-CAPITAL OUTLAY-OTHER IMPROVEME 23,242 64,551 12,059 1,712,000 1,448,500 180,217 1,463,000 1,331,000 1,562,000 1,562,000 6701-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 23,242 69,318 13,809 1,712,000 1,555,300 186,213 1,508,000 1,376,000 1,610,700 1,610,700 6700-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 23,242 69,318 13,809 1,712,000 1,555,300 186,213 1,508,000 1,376,000 1,610,700 1,610,700 6810-CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS -706 0 4,360 0 6801-TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS -706 0 4,360 0 6800-TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS -706 0 4,360 0 6910-BOND PRINCIPAL 0 0 0 844,600 867,540 0 885,835 885,835 914,530 914,530 6901-TOTAL DEBT SERVICE 0 0 0 844,600 867,540 0 885,835 885,835 914,530 914,530 6900-TOTAL DEBT SERVICE 0 0 0 844,600 867,540 0 885,835 885,835 914,530 914,530 7010-BOND ISSUANCE EXPENSES 57,059 0 7015-DEBT SERVICE-INTEREST 246,021 282,718 106,917 271,630 250,500 46,370 227,740 227,740 204,480 204,480 7020-BOND PAYING AGENT FEES 750 0 7001-TOTAL INTEREST AND FISCAL FEES 246,021 282,718 164,726 271,630 250,500 46,370 227,740 227,740 204,480 204,480 7000-TOTAL INTEREST AND FISCAL FEES 246,021 282,718 164,726 271,630 250,500 46,370 227,740 227,740 204,480 204,480 7110-TRANSFER TO OTHER FUNDS 363,070 360,000 370,000 370,000 385,000 160,417 396,500 396,500 416,000 416,000 7125-ADMINI CHARGE TO OTHER FUNDS 218,600 225,000 232,600 232,600 238,000 99,167 245,000 245,000 257,000 257,000 7101-TOTAL TRANSFERS 581,670 585,000 602,600 602,600 623,000 259,583 641,500 641,500 673,000 673,000 7100-TOTAL TRANSFERS 581,670 585,000 602,600 602,600 623,000 259,583 641,500 641,500 673,000 673,000 4,722,318 4,824,546 5,003,946 7,951,420 7,732,925 2,147,899 8,042,635 7,951,635 8,448,965 8,438,165 356 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 65: WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS-5305 Public Works Department COMPANY 5300: WATER&SEWER FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND REVENUE 4910 Water Charges 5,806,000 6,096,000 6,096,000 6,401,000 6,401,000 6,721,000 6,721,000 4912 Water Connection Charges 45,000 45,000 45,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 4913 Other Water 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 5010 Investment Interest 63,000 63,000 63,000 63,000 63,000 63,000 63,000 Total 5,989,000 6,279,000 6,279,000 6,639,000 6,639,000 6,959,000 6,959,000 SALARIES 6110 Regular Employees 737,795 774,800 774,800 835,450 835,450 873,175 873,175 6111 Salary-Part time - - - 21,190 21,190 22,230 22,230 6112 Salary-Seasonal Temp(2 seasonal 20wks=1600hrs) 24,600 24,800 24,800 25,600 25,600 29,700 29,700 6113 Overtime-Reg 39,200 40,200 40,200 41,400 41,400 42,500 42,500 6113 Overtime-On Call Program 17,100 17,500 17,500 18,000 18,000 18,500 18,500 6123 Salaries-Other 24,340 31,070 31,070 31,425 31,425 33,335 33,335 6138 Medicare 12,225 12,880 12,880 14,110 14,110 14,780 14,780 6139 FICA 52,270 55,080 55,080 60,330 60,330 63,205 63,205 6141 Pension-PERA 61,380 64,770 64,770 71,060 71,060 74,230 74,230 6142 Worker's Compensation 26,700 29,250 29,250 34,290 34,290 37,740 37,740 6144 Long-Term Disability Insurance 2,320 2,215 2,215 2,385 2,385 2,495 2,495 6145 Hospital&Life Insurance 179,580 175,200 175,200 184,860 184,860 195,060 195,060 Reclassify Position-GIS/Dept Specialist - 10,000 10,000 Reclassify Position-GIS Tech(w/Eng,Sewer,Storm) - 3,000 3,000 6170 Employee Paid Premiums _ - (22,000) (22,000) (22,400) (22,400) (22,400) (22,400) Total 1,177,510 1,218,765 1,218,765 1,317,700 1,317,700 1,384,550 1,384,550 6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES General Office Supplies 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 Large Printer Paper 50 500 500 500 500 500 500 Total 800 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 6211 SMALL TOOL&EQUIPMENT Small Tools 3,860 3,900 3,900 3,800 3,800 3,900 3,900 Electric/Power Tools 850 900 900 800 800 800 800 !pad and Laptop Purchase/Replacement 4,000 4,000 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 Organize Shop-Shelves,Pallet Racks,Work Bench 2,500 2,500 800 800 800 800 Tools-Restock Trucks 2,000 2,000 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 Replacements-UPS,RTU's Controls 500 500 1,800 1,800 Booster Station Valves 8"&10" 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 BW Tank Acuator&Rod(4)1/yr 7,500 7,500 7,500 10,000 10,000 12,500 12,500 Hi-E Dryer-Wells 1,000 1,000 1,200 1,200 Chlorine 1-Ton Mount Regulator 2,500 2,500 2,800 2,800 Tool Box Replacement-WTP 300 300 Replace Generator Encloser Nordic Booster Station 8,000 8,000 Well Sounder 2,500 2,500 3,000 3,000 Chlorine Analyzer 4,500 5,500 5,500 New line locator 8,000 8,000 Well level transducer 3,500 3,500 Hydrant Buddy 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 Hydrant Diffuser(2) 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 Total 30,310 38,100 38,100 39,600 39,600 57,500 57,500 6212 MOTOR FUELS/OILS No Lead Fuel 12,000 12,200 12,200 18,200 18,200 18,200 18,200 Diesel Fuel 3,100 3,200 3,200 3,700 3,700 3,700 3,700 Diesel Fuel Tax 375 250 250 250 250 250 250 Oil(Wells 4&5) 1,150 1,200 1,200 1,000 1,000 1,200 1,200 Diesel-Generators 1,700 2,150 2,150 2,500 2,500 3,000 3,000 Oil/Lubricants 1,300 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,600 1,600 Total 19,625 20,400 20,400 27,050 27,050 27,950 27,950 6214 CHEMICALS Treatment Chemicals-Chlorine 12,500 12,500 31,500 35,000 35,000 40,000 40,000 Treatment Chemicals-Fluoride 12,500 15,000 19,100 21,000 21,000 26,000 26,000 Sodium Permanganate 13,000 14,100 17,000 17,500 17,500 18,000 18,000 Total 38,000 41,600 67,600 73,500 73,500 84,000 84,000 6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS Vehicle:Fleet 5,800 5,800 5,800 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 WTP:Chlorine(tainer),HVAC,Pumps,Solenoids 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,500 25,500 Wells:Air Reliefs,Other 5,300 5,200 5,200 5,000 5,000 5,500 5,500 Distribution:Mains,Meters,Hydrants,Pressure Station 20,500 20,500 20,500 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 General Equipment Supplies/Other 14,000 14,500 14,500 15,000 15,000 16,000 16,000 Total 70,600 71,000 71,000 71,000 71,000 73,000 73,000 6216 EQUIPMENT-TIRES/BATTERIES Batteries-Generators,Wells 4&5 1,500 1,000 1,000 800 800 900 900 Batteries- 875 1,000 1,000 1,200 1,200 800 800 Tires 1,500 1,900 1,900 1,900 1,900 2,000 2,000 Total 3,875 3,900 3,900 3,900 3,900 3,700 3,700 6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES Safety:PPE,Cones,Gloves 4,600 4,800 4,800 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Shop:Nuts,Bolts,Steel,Reagents 3,600 3,600 3,600 3,650 3,650 3,650 3,650 Field:Marking Paint,Flags,Grout 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,800 2,800 2,900 2,900 Excavation:Sand/gravel,Erosion,Anodes,Seed 5,100 5,100 5,100 5,100 5,100 6,000 6,000 General/Other 6,200 6,200 6,200 6,500 6,500 _ 6,500 6,500 Total 22,100 22,300 22,300 23,050 23,050 _ 24,050 24,050 357 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 65: WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS-5305 Public Works Department COMPANY 5300: WATER&SEWER FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND 6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES Water Distribution System Modeling Services 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,500 8,500 Engineering Consulting Firm Costs 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,500 13,500 Legal Expenses 2,750 2,750 2,750 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 Audit 11,500 10,650 10,650 11,000 11,000 11,250 11,250 OSHA Required Tests(Hearing,Hep B,etc.) 825 850 850 850 850 1,000 1,000 CCR Report Preparation 7,200 5,500 5,500 5,600 5,600 5,000 5,000 SCADA System Equipment Assessment Study 12,000 12,000 Palomino Reservoir Inspection of Rehab'23 25,000 25,000 Lead and Copper(New Rule)System Audit 25,000 25,000 42,000 42,000 Nordic Reservoir Rehab plans&Inspect(2025 Rehab) 25,000 25,000 Palomino Reservoir Int Rehab Plans&Inspection 25,000 15,000 15,000 Quarry Point Reservoir Inspection 25,000 Water System Pressure Reducing Station Study - 33,000 Fiber Integration Towers,Wells to WTP 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 10,000 10,000 Total 101,275 85,750 77,750 105,950 146,950 93,750 93,750 6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS Gopher State w/GSOC Ticket Management(moved to 6399) 8,500 - - - Telephones 5,800 6,000 6,000 6,100 6,100 6,500 6,500 Cellular Phone/Communications 2,000 2,100 2,100 2,200 2,200 3,000 3,000 Wireless Air Card 8,100 8,200 8,200 8,200 8,200 8,500 8,500 Total 24,400 16,300 16,300 16,500 16,500 18,000 18,000 6238 POSTAGE/UPS/FEDEX Postage 37,000 12,600 15,000 15,000 15,000 17,000 17,000 Consumer Confidence Mailing 100 100 100 50 50 100 100 Meter Program Certified Letters 2,000 500 500 100 100 100 100 Billing Inserts 100 100 100 100 100 1,000 1,000 Shipping(SSI/Other) 500 500 500 600 600 600 600 Total 39,700 13,800 16,200 15,850 15,850 18,800 18,800 6239 PRINTING/PUBLISHING Water Bills 100 100 100 - - Assessment Rolls 3,100 3,100 3,100 3,100 3,100 3,100 3,100 Educational Materials 575 575 575 500 500 500 500 Print Chip Books 1,500 2,500 500 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Consumer Confidence Report 500 500 500 100 100 100 100 Water-Off and Restriction Notices 600 600 600 500 500 500 500 Total 6,375 7,375 5,375 5,200 5,200 5,200 5,200 6240 C.SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVAL Water Break Material Disposal 1,000 1,400 3,900 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 Cleaning Services-WTP/CMF 5,000 3,500 500 500 500 500 500 Total 6,000 4,900 4,400 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES Standard&Coliform Bacteria Testing 9,700 - - - Coliform Bacteria Sample Collection 19,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 12,000 12,000 Lead and Copper Sampling and Testing - - 18,000 18,000 15,000 15,000 Water Meter Reading 7,500 - - - Hydrant Painting&Sandblasting 35,000 37,000 37,000 37,200 37,200 40,000 40,000 Printing/Mailing Water Bills 68,000 22,500 22,500 22,500 22,500 22,500 22,500 800 mHz Radio Fees 325 325 325 350 350 400 400 Leak Detection&Survey 10,300 10,500 10,500 10,500 10,500 11,000 11,000 Plumbing Repairs 1,575 1,575 1,500 1,600 1,600 2,000 2,000 Metro Alarm Monitoring(Wells 1,2) 1,650 1,650 250 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 WTP Discharge Samples 1,150 1,200 500 1,200 1,200 12,000 1,200 Fire Extinguisher Testing 675 675 675 700 700 750 750 Overhead Hoist Inspection 635 650 650 675 675 700 700 Meter Testing 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 500 500 WTP Boiler Inspection 100 100 100 150 150 200 200 Dakota County Aerial Photos JPA 1,150 1,150 1,150 1,050 1,050 1,150 1,150 Fire System Monitoring-WTP 450 450 1,250 1,455 1,455 1,500 1,500 Fire System Annual Testing-WTP 700 700 1,000 420 420 500 500 CO System Annual Testing 425 450 450 500 500 600 600 Well 10 Generator Emissions Testing - - 3,800 3,800 5,000 5,000 WTP Generator Emissions Testing - - 6,000 6,000 8,000 8,000 Well 3 Pest Control Services 300 300 300 375 375 450 450 HVAC Maintenance Agreement 5,250 5,250 5,250 5,800 5,800 6,500 6,500 TESTT Electrical Equipment testing 3,200 3,200 3,200 3,200 Longridge Reservoir Mowing _ 2,800 2,800 500 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Total 167,685 98,275 94,400 128,975 128,975 146,450 135,650 6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC Wells and Water Treatment Plant 355,000 360,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 425,000 425,000 Total 355,000 360,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 425,000 425,000 6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS WTP, Wells and Booster 37,000 37,000 37,000 32,000 32,000 35,000 35,000 Total 37,000 37,000 37,000 32,000 32,000 35,000 35,000 6257 UTILITIES-PROPANE General Use 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 2,000 2,000 Total 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 2,000 2,000 6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT Vehicle:Fleet 5,300 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 WTP:Electrical,Controls,Dehumidifier,Communication 39,000 39,000 39,000 37,000 37,000 38,000 38,000 Wells:Electrical,Controls-PLC,Transdcuer 17,350 17,400 17,400 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Distribution:Mains,Meters,Hydrants,Pressure Station 13,400 13,500 13,500 13,500 13,500 13,500 13,500 Generator:Maintenance 16,700 17,000 17,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 General Equipment:Locator,Radio,UB,BF 25,500 25,550 25,550 22,000 22,000 22,500 22,500 358 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 65: WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS-5305 Public Works Department COMPANY 5300: WATER&SEWER FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND WTP Add Ext Camera Front&Generator Doors - - - - Total 117,250 117,950 117,950 108,000 108,000 109,500 109,500 6266 REPAIRS-BUILDINGS Heaters,Boilers,Air Conditioner,etc. 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 6,000 6,000 WTP/Well Buildings(Trim,Doors,Roofs,Etc.) 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,500 15,500 16,000 16,000 Total 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,500 20,500 22,000 22,000 6269 REPAIRS-OTHER Thawing Water Lines 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Water Main Breaks 80,000 80,000 80,000 75,000 75,000 78,000 78,000 Landscape Restoration 6,000 6,000 6,000 5,000 5,000 5,500 5,500 Curb Stop Repairs 16,000 16,500 16,500 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Miscellaneous(Ex:Hyd.Damage,GV Repair) 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 Total 115,000 115,500 115,500 108,000 108,000 111,500 111,500 6275 SCHOOL/CONF/EXP-LOCAL School&Certifications/State AWWA 3,500 4,100 4,100 5,000 5,000 5,500 5,500 MPWA Spring/Fall Conferences-Director&Superint. 430 850 850 900 900 900 900 MRWA School 725 750 750 800 800 1,000 1,000 ESRI GIS State Conference 1,150 1,150 1,150 - - - - Cartegraph training(CMF GIS Staff) 500 500 Leadership Academy(added to career development) 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 - - Safety/Specialty Training Classes 900 900 900 900 900 900 900 Career Development 5,000 5,000 CDL Training(split Water,Sanitary&Storm) 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 Total 8,205 9,250 9,250 13,100 13,100 17,800 17,800 6276 SCHOOL/CONF/EXP-OTHER AWWA National - 2,500 2,500 - - 2,800 2,800 Cartegraph Nat Conference-every other year(w/storm&sanitary) 1,200 1,200 - - Maint Employee Training 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 Total 1,200 3,700 3,700 2,700 2,700 4,300 4,300 6277 MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE Superintendent-50% 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 Billing Training 675 675 675 675 675 300 300 Total 875 875 875 875 875 500 500 6278 SUBSISTENCE ALLOWANCE State AWWA Conference x2 400 400 400 400 400 300 300 MRWA School/Training 450 450 450 450 450 500 500 AWWA National - 250 250 250 250 400 400 Total 850 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,200 1,200 6280 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS Certification Renewal Fees 375 450 450 500 500 600 600 MRWA&APWA Memberships 540 800 800 825 825 850 850 Cartegraph Support&Hosting 8,125 8,365 8,365 8,800 8,800 9,220 9,220 Asset Management Citizen App(split PW/San/Storm/Cemetery)(An 5,000 5,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 GSOC Annual Fee(moved/added to 6399 GSOC Locates) 100 - - - MGWA Dues 50 55 55 60 60 60 60 SUSA Dues(50/50 Water&Sewer) 250 275 275 150 150 150 150 AWWA Dues-Utility Membership 3,525 3,800 3,800 3,800 3,800 3,900 3,900 SCADA hosting/Opworks(split with Water,Sanitary&Storm) 2,000 6,200 6,200 6,200 6,200 Korterra GSOC Ticket Mgmt Annual(split Water,Sewer,Storm) 1,250 1,400 650 650 750 750 Total 19,215 20,145 17,745 22,985 22,985 23,730 23,730 6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE Utility Employees 4,800 4,800 4,800 5,000 5,000 5,100 5,100 Total 4,800 4,800 4,800 5,000 5,000 5,100 5,100 6310 RENTAL EXPENSE General Rental 550 550 1,050 800 800 850 850 Scaffolding 500 500 - - - - - Home and Garden Show(move from 6229) 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,325 1,325 1,325 1,325 Total 2,350 2,350 2,350 2,125 2,125 2,175 2,175 6311 INSURANCE General,Auto,Property Liability 152,200 160,000 160,000 165,000 165,000 167,000 167,000 Total 152,200 160,000 160,000 165,000 165,000 167,000 167,000 6399 OTHER CHARGES LOGIS 98,600 100,000 100,000 105,500 105,500 109,400 109,400 GSOC Locates(Moved from 6237)split water,sewer,storm - 9,000 9,000 3,100 3,100 3,200 3,200 Water Meter Customer Portal-Setup - - - - Water Meter Customer Portal-Annual Fees(w/Sewer) 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,250 16,250 16,500 16,500 Yearly Hosting Fee(AMI Support)(w/Sewer) 82,000 7,500 7,500 7,600 7,600 7,700 7,700 Invoice Cloud Imbedding in Portal 2,750 2,750 2,750 2,800 2,800 2,800 2,800 DNR Water Use Permit 37,000 37,000 43,225 44,000 44,000 45,000 45,000 Hazardous Chemical Inventory Fee 540 550 550 450 450 450 450 Generator Emission Fee 1,200 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 Discharge Permit/Strength Charge 9,200 9,400 9,400 9,400 9,400 9,400 9,400 County Obstruction Permit 300 300 300 350 350 400 400 Total 247,590 183,900 190,125 190,850 190,850 196,250 196,250 6351 CREDIT CARD FEES Annual Fees 32,000 32,500 35,000 33,000 33,000 37,000 37,000 Total 32,000 32,500 35,000 33,000 33,000 37,000 37,000 6540 TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE Water Meters 30,000 15,000 62,100 40,000 40,000 45,000 45,000 Total 30,000 15,000 62,100 40,000 40,000 45,000 45,000 6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE 9,400 Water Meters Total - 9,400 - - - - 359 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 65: WATER UTILITY OPERATIONS-5305 Public Works Department COMPANY 5300: WATER&SEWER FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND 6610 DEPRECIATION Depreciation 1,667,000 1,707,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 1,900,000 1,900,000 Total 1,667,000 1,707,000 - 1,800,000 1,800,000 1,900,000 1,900,000 6730 CAPITAL OUTLAY-VEHICLES 2024 Replce 3/4 Ton Pickup(411) 48,700 48,700 2023 Add vehicle-1 Ton Utility Dump Truck(w/sewer) 45,000 45,000 2022 Replace 409 3/4 Ton Vehicle Exterior Cab(Toolbox,Plow) 46,400 46,400 Replace 416 3/4 Ton Vehicle Exterior Cab(Toolbox,Plow) 47,400 47,400 Track Skid Steer(w/Sewer,Storm,Streets) 13,000 13,000 Total - 106,800 106,800 45,000 45,000 48,700 48,700 6735 CAPITAL OUTLAY-OTHER IMP Fiber Extension Project 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 Gate Valve Replacement 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 40,000 40,000 Water Break Street Patching 50,000 75,000 75,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Water Conservation Grant Program(Irrigation Sensors) 10,000 - 10,000 10,000 Replace Water Meter System 100,000 2024 Well Maint&Rehab-Well's 12&3 120,000 120,000 WTP High Service Pump Maint-LZP2 25,000 25,000 SCADA System Upgrade 300,000 300,000 Valleywood Wash and Inspect 12,000 12,000 WTP Backwash Tank A Maint 15,000 15,000 Anodes for Longridge/Harwell 150,000 150,000 Greenleaf 4th Addition Phase 1 650,000 650,000 Whitney Dr.Garden View to Redwood 100,000 100,000 2023 Well Maint&Rehab-Wells 5,10&15 150,000 150,000 WTP Pump Maintenance-HZP1 16,000 16,000 Add Chlorintainer WTP - - Fiber to Wells(Equipment Upgrades for Fiber) 75,000 75,000 Nordic Reservoir Wash&Inspect 10,000 10,000 Water System Pressure Reducing Station Study 33,000 - Replace Valve Backwash Tank B 15,000 15,000 HZP Add VFD 70,000 70,000 Install GV CR42/Granada&CR42/Dundee 50,000 50,000 142nd St.(Cedar to Galaxie) 50,000 50,000 AV 3rd Walnut Ln(Elm Dr.-Park Ln)EdwoodLn,Park Ln 540,000 540,000 133rd Street Watermain Replacment 99,000 99,000 - 2022 Palomino Reservoir Intermediate Rehab 235,000 185,000 185,000 Well Maintenance&Rehabilitation-Wells 19&17 150,000 150,000 WTP Pump Maintenance-HZP3 16,000 16,000 Booster Station Rehab 235,000 Well 4 Natural Gas Engine Heat Exchanger Rehabilitation 25,000 - WTP Additional Chlortainer 280,000 - HZP Add VFD 60,000 60,000 Fiber to Wells 4,15,10,11,14 for SCADA 75,000 75,000 Replace WTP Dehumidifying Boilers 18,500 100,000 Redwood Drive/Juniper Lane 369,000 369,000 Greenleaf 6th and 7th(Euclid Ct,Eveleth Ct,139th St.Ct)Phase 1 75,000 75,000 2021 Well Rehabilitation Nos.7,9 155,000 WTP HZP2 Maintenance 16,000 Pressure Station R&R Garden View&137th St 100,000 Quarry Point Tower Interior Rehab(Move to'21$226K) 226,000 Wells 1&3 Electrical Upgrade(Only Well 1) 55,000 Well 3 Driveway Replacement-Palomino Dr 11,000 Fiber to Wells 8,12,13,Herald Way 75,000 2021 Street&Utility Recon(Cim Phase 2;133rd Gal-Fstaff) 844,000 Total 1,712,000 1,448,500 1,324,000 1,463,000 1,331,000 1,562,000 1,562,000 6910 BOND PRINCIPAL 2013 WTP Bonds&2018 Meter Replacement 844,600 867,540 867,540 885,835 885,835 914,530 914,530 Total 844,600 867,540 867,540 885,835 885,835 914,530 914,530 7015 BOND INTEREST 2013 WTP Bonds&2018 Meter Replacement _ 271,630 250,500 250,500 227,740 227,740 204,480 204,480 Total 271,630 250,500 250,500 227,740 227,740 204,480 204,480 7110 TRANSFER TO OTHER FUNDS General Fund 370,000 385,000 385,000 396,500 396,500 416,000 416,000 Total 370,000 385,000 385,000 396,500 396,500 416,000 416,000 7125 ADMIN CHARGE TO GENERAL FUND 232,600 238,000 238,000 245,000 245,000 257,000 257,000 Total 232,600 238,000 238,000 245,000 245,000 257,000 257,000 Total Net of Personnel 6,773,910 6,514,160 4,799,510 6,724,935 6,633,935 7,064,415 7,053,615 TOTAL EXPENSES $ 7,951,420 $ 7,732,925 $ 6,018,275 $ 8,042,635 $ 7,951,635 $ 8,448,965 $ 8,438,165 LESS Capital Outlay $ (1,712,000) $ (1,555,300) $ (1,430,800) $ (1,508,000) $ (1,376,000) $ (1,610,700) $ (1,610,700) TOTAL EXP WITHOUT CAPITAL OUTLAY 6,239,420 6,177,625 4,587,475 6,534,635 6,575,635 6,838,265 6,827,465 360 ••• •••• ••••• ••• AppValley Notes: 361 COMPANY DEPARTMENT BUSINESS UNIT ACTIVITY 5300 66 5365 SEWER OPERATIONS Public Works DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY The Sanitary Sewer Utility Division is responsible for operating and maintaining the sanitary sewer conveyance system including cleaning underground pipes, lift stations, pressure relief valves. The City's sanitary sewer system includes of 203 miles of sewer pipe; 5,550 manhole structures; and 9 sanitary lift stations. This business unit also provides funding for wastewater treatment charges through the regional wastewater treatment plant system operated by Metropolitan Council Environmental Services. SERVICE CATEGORIES The Sanitary Sewer Utility Division provides wastewater service over 55,000 customers within the City of Apple Valley. The following services are provided within this division. 1. Wastewater Conveyance Services • Safely convey an average annual volume of 1.2 billion gallons of wastewater for customer within the City of Apple Valley • Coordinate disposal of wastewater into trunk and interceptor sewers located at the City borders, including the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services system, the City of Burnsville (northwestern portion of Apple Valley) and the City of Eagan (Minnesota Zoo, Lebanon Hills Regional Park and Briar Oaks Development) • Wastewater is processed at the regional Empire and Seneca wastewater treatment plants owned and operated by Metropolitan Council Environmental Services 2. Maintenance, Inspection and Cleaning Services • Conduct inspections of approximately 10 miles of sewers per year using remote control televising inspection equipment to assess pipe condition, detect locations of pipe failure and blockage within the collection system • Perform manhole inspections and pipe system cleaning for approximately 65 miles of sanitary sewers per year using City jetting and vacuum equipment to maintain system conveyance capacity and minimize sewer backups • Repair damaged or deteriorated segments of the pipe and manhole system using cured in place lining, high performance coatings or infrastructure replacement work 3. Lift Station Operation Services • Maintain sanitary sewer lift stations, including inspection of station controls, testing of alarm systems and review of electrical components to ensure reliability • Remove and repair damaged pumps and other station components • Continuously monitor alarms and security status with SCADA System 362 MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2023 • Maintain compliance with Federal and State mandates • Maintain sanitary sewer system with zero sewer backups • Fiber extension to lift stations for better SCADA communications • CIPP Lining Sanitary—Townhome Mains 142nd St Ct • Lift Station 10 Upgrade Control Panel MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2024 • Maintain compliance with Federal and State mandates • Maintain sanitary sewer system with zero sewer backups • Fiber extension to certain lift stations for better SCADA communications • CIPP Lining Sanitary— 134 St. • Replace Lift station 11 control panel • Continue to upgrade the sanitary SCADA system IMPACT MEASURES / PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual Actual Actual Projected Projected Projected Item 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Number of Gallons Conveyed (in billions) 1.1 1.216 1.214 1.207 1.21 1.22 Miles of Sewer Cleaned 49 51 90 68 68 68 Number of Sewer Backups 1 1 2 0 0 0 within System per year Regular Status Personnel Schedule— FTE's Adopted Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Position Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Public Works Superintendent 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Public Works Supervisor 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Accounting Technician 1 1 1 1 1 1 Department Specialist 1 1 1 1 1 1 Utilities Foreman 1 1 1 1 1 1 Technical Specialist 1 1 1 1 1 1 Maintenance II / I 3 3 3 3 3 3 GIS Coordinator 0.25 .25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 FT position split with 1510,5305,5505 Temporary Status Personnel Schedule - Hours Adopted Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Position Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Seasonal 2,000 2,000 2,000 1,600 1,600 1,800 363 Summary Budget Department 66-Sewer Operations 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Proposed Proposed Proposed Revenue: 4914 Utility Charges 5,704,669 5,983,252 6,455,282 6,265,000 6,579,000 6,908,000 7,253,000 5010/5013 Investment Earnings 50% 53,183 59,231 (12,325) 54,000 63,000 63,000 63,000 4920/4921/4999 Shared Rev w/Wtr 61,436 40,333 58,698 - - - - 4917 Other Sewer - - 27,809 60,000 60,000 60,000 100,000 5,819,288 6,082,816 6,529,464 6,379,000 6,702,000 7,031,000 7,416,000 Expenditures: Salaries&Wages 514,296 525,458 602,684 657,235 648,530 682,895 706,985 Employee Benefits 231,224 178,573 238,561 231,675 220,745 228,935 241,810 Supplies 56,157 53,285 48,044 87,605 86,690 95,150 98,150 Contractual Services 57,763 38,997 56,098 100,715 70,875 79,350 62,750 Utilities 24,376 26,212 24,044 30,500 29,000 29,600 30,200 Repairs&Maintenance 27,341 20,154 41,350 72,000 64,700 69,200 84,500 Training/Travel/Dues 17,966 13,915 11,994 21,680 23,315 33,830 38,425 MCES Sewer Charges 3,042,448 3,275,588 3,011,244 3,012,000 3,387,344 3,761,215 3,949,000 Other Expenses 276,498 285,574 298,526 313,475 330,625 341,775 350,175 VISA/MC charges 23,266 28,422 36,898 27,000 34,000 38,000 38,500 Depreciation 901,519 961,250 961,934 977,000 1,003,000 1,100,000 1,200,000 Capital Outlay-Other not Capitalized - 3,297 (2,670) 1,582,000 947,500 1,040,000 1,581,000 Transfers/Admin Charge to GF 571,950 587,000 605,000 605,000 623,000 641,500 673,000 Transfers to Other Funds - - - - - - - Total Exp 5,744,803 5,997,727 5,933,705 7,717,885 7,469,324 8,141,450 9,054,495 Net Income 74,485 85,089 595,759 (1,338,885) (767,324) (1,110,450) (1,638,495) Change in Cash:UPDATE Less:Capital outlay-Not Above(Capitalized) (818,064) (1,114,677) (815,104) - - - Contributed Assets - - Add:Depreciation 901,519 961,250 961,934 977,000 1,003,000 1,100,000 1,200,000 Net Change in Cash 157,940 (68,338) 742,589 (361,885) 235,676 (10,450) (438,495) 364 2023 Capital Outlay 6730 VEHICLES: 1 Ton Utility Dump Truck (w/Water) $ 45,000 $ 45,000 6735 OTHER IMPROVEMENTS: Fiber Extension $ 40,000 CIPP Line Sanitary Townhome Mains 142nd St Ct $ 200,000 Lift Station 10 New Control Panel $ 120,000 New portable 4" Pump (Sanitary, Storm) $ 15,000 142nd St. (Cedar to Galaxie) $ 50,000 AV 3rd Walnut Ln (Elm Dr. - Park Ln) Edgewood Ln, Park Ln $ 570,000 $ 995,000 Total Capital Outlay $ 1,040,000 2024 Capital Outlay 6730 VEHICLES: Mainline Sewer TV Truck (split with Storm) $ 75,000 Replace Portable Generator $ 65,000 Replace Skid Steer Attachment $ 26,000 $ 166,000 6735 OTHER IMPROVEMENTS: Fiber Extension $ 40,000 CIPP Lining Sanitary— 134th Street $ 225,000 Replace Sanitary Lift Station 11 control panel $ 100,000 SCADA System Upgrade $ 300,000 Whitney Dr. — Garden view to Redwood $ 100,000 Greenleaf 4th Addition PH 1 $ 650,000 Subtotal $1,415,000 Total Capital Outlay $1,581,000 City of Apple Valley 365 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) SEWER OPERATIONS 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6110-SALARY-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 473,127 500,830 546,462 572,175 551,935 249,046 599,300 599,300 617,770 617,770 6112-SALARY-SEASONAL TEMP 15,154 7,108 14,579 19,600 24,800 799 25,600 25,600 29,700 29,700 6113-OVERTIME-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 37,018 31,727 39,840 49,500 50,750 19,259 40,000 40,000 41,000 41,000 6118-VACATION PAY 10,927 -2,131 18,994 0 6119-ANNUAL LEAVE -14 0 0 6121-INSURANCE CASH BENEFIT 1,440 3,240 3,540 2,760 6122-COMP REQUEST -23,370 -15,302 -20,731 -9,223 6123-SALARY-OTHER 15,960 21,045 17,995 17,995 18,515 18,515 6105-SALARIES AND WAGES 514,296 525,458 602,684 657,235 648,530 262,641 682,895 682,895 706,985 706,985 6138-MEDICARE 6,883 7,180 7,961 8,945 9,360 3,559 9,900 9,900 10,250 10,250 6139-FICA 29,431 30,336 34,039 38,255 40,020 15,219 42,340 42,340 43,835 43,835 6141-PENSIONS-PERA 36,467 36,692 42,111 44,805 46,555 19,420 49,300 49,300 50,795 50,795 6142-WORKERS COMPENSATION 19,767 10,273 19,017 18,455 22,430 7,720 22,675 22,675 24,660 24,660 6144-LONG-TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE 974 1,042 997 1,645 1,570 452 1,700 1,700 1,750 1,750 6145-MEDICAL INSURANCE 164,500 112,599 142,040 119,570 125,810 56,606 128,520 128,520 136,020 136,020 6146-DENTAL INSURANCE 8,321 8,793 9,604 4,675 6147-LIFE INSURANCE-BASIC 45 44 53 84 6148-LIFE INSURANCE-SUPP/DEPEND 1,172 801 3,364 1,081 6170-EMPLOYEE PAID PREMIUMS -36,335 -29,187 -20,624 -25,000 -3,406 -25,500 -25,500 -25,500 -25,500 6125-EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 231,224 178,573 238,561 231,675 220,745 105,410 228,935 228,935 241,810 241,810 6100-TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 745,521 704,031 841,245 888,910 869,275 368,051 911,830 911,830 948,795 948,795 6210-OFFICE SUPPLIES 441 386 285 250 300 44 300 300 300 300 6211-SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT 4,319 10,782 12,819 21,335 20,540 5,300 22,650 22,650 26,850 26,850 6212-MOTOR FUELS/OILS 14,067 9,465 12,004 17,000 16,350 6,026 21,950 21,950 19,350 19,350 6215-EQUIPMENT-PARTS 29,081 23,491 12,353 34,875 35,000 9,167 35,550 35,550 36,550 36,550 6216-VEHICLES-TIRES/BATTERIES 3,215 4,022 518 4,125 4,500 -36 4,550 4,550 4,650 4,650 6229-GENERAL SUPPLIES 5,034 5,139 10,066 10,020 10,000 2,099 10,150 10,150 10,450 10,450 6205-SUPPLIES 56,157 53,285 48,044 87,605 86,690 22,600 95,150 95,150 98,150 98,150 6231-LEGAL SERVICES 0 0 3,907 0 6234-CITY ENGINEER CONSULTANT SERV 4,114 1,925 5,073 4,207 6235-CONSULTANT SERVICES 20,569 11,504 22,126 24,025 23,175 7,258 24,050 24,050 24,200 24,200 6237-TELEPHONE/PAGERS 1,648 1,813 2,661 1,640 1,850 2,184 5,600 5,600 6,000 6,000 6238-POSTAGE/UPS/FEDEX 13,869 13,934 15,221 37,000 12,600 6,870 16,000 16,000 16,500 16,500 6239-PRINTING 1,134 745 2,081 1,850 1,950 1,267 1,950 1,950 1,950 1,950 6240-CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE -1,805 344 -2,951 2,500 2,500 0 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 6249-OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 18,232 8,732 7,980 33,700 28,800 7,870 29,250 29,250 11,600 11,600 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 57,763 38,997 56,098 100,715 70,875 29,655 79,350 79,350 62,750 62,750 6255-UTILITIES-ELECTRIC 23,780 25,563 23,351 29,500 28,000 12,767 28,500 28,500 29,000 29,000 6256-UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS 596 649 693 1,000 1,000 402 1,100 1,100 1,200 1,200 6250-UTILITIES 24,376 26,212 24,044 30,500 29,000 13,169 29,600 29,600 30,200 30,200 6265-REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 22,970 14,719 25,755 38,500 31,200 2,496 33,700 33,700 34,000 34,000 6266-REPAIRS-BUILDING 0 0 5,394 598 6269-REPAIRS-OTHER 4,371 5,435 10,200 33,500 33,500 30,760 35,500 35,500 50,500 50,500 6260-REPAIRS AND MAINTENA 27,341 20,154 41,350 72,000 64,700 33,854 69,200 69,200 84,500 84,500 6275-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL 2,182 1,660 522 3,950 5,065 2,186 9,850 9,850 14,650 14,650 6276-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXPOTHER 1,012 497 300 1,473 1,200 1,200 0 0 6277-MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE 1,545 0 0 400 400 0 400 400 600 600 6278-SUBSISTENCE ALLOWANCE 325 0 0 450 450 0 550 550 600 600 6280-DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 7,786 9,183 8,385 13,880 14,200 9,541 18,030 18,030 18,675 18,675 6281-UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 5.116 2,576 2,786 3,000 3,200 1,157 3,800 3,800 3,900 3,900 6270-TRNG/TRAVLJDUES/UNIF 17,966 13,915 11,994 21,680 23,315 14,357 33,830 33,830 38,425 38,425 City of Apple Valley 366 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) SEWER OPERATIONS 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 183,603 152,564 181,529 312,500 274,580 113,636 307,130 307,130 314,025 314,025 6310-RENTAL EXPENSE 0 0 0 325 350 0 550 550 550 550 6311-INSURANCE-PROPERTY/LIABILITY 103,600 106,700 108,000 108,000 110,000 45,833 113,000 113,000 116,000 116,000 6317-METRO WASTE CONTROL PAYMENT 3,042,448 3,275,588 3,011,244 3,012,000 3,387,344 1,975,943 3,761,215 3,761,215 3,949,000 3,949,000 6318-BURNSVILLE/EAGAN SWR REIMBURSE 85,130 87,039 88,771 87,000 90,000 36,576 92,000 92,000 93,000 93,000 6333-GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS -33 -78 -74 -33 6351-VISA/BANK CHARGES 23,266 28,422 36,898 27,000 34,000 16,237 38,000 38,000 38,500 38,500 6399-OTHER CHARGES 87,801 91,913 101,828 118,150 130,275 55,097 136,225 136,225 140,625 140,625 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES 3,342,212 3,589,584 3,346,668 3,352,475 3,751,969 2,129,654 4,140,990 4,140,990 4,337,675 4,337,675 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES 3,342,212 3,589,584 3,346,668 3,352,475 3,751,969 2,129,654 4,140,990 4,140,990 4,337,675 4,337,675 6401-EXPENDITURES 6400-TOTAL EXPENDITURES 6610-DEPRECIATION 901,519 961,250 961,934 977,000 1,003,000 111,216 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 6601-TOTAL DEPRECIATION 901,519 961,250 961,934 977,000 1,003,000 111,216 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 6600-TOTAL DEPRECIATION 901,519 961,250 961,934 977,000 1,003,000 111,216 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 6730-CAPITAL OUTLAY-TRANSPORTATION 0 0 0 106,000 93,000 5,901 45,000 45,000 166,000 166,000 6735-CAPITAL OUTLAY-OTHER IMPROVEME 0 3,297 3,488 1,476,000 854,500 32,269 995,000 995,000 1,415,000 1,415,000 6740-CAPITAL OUTLAY-MACH/EQ/OTHER 0 0 0 0 6701-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 0 3,297 3,488 1,582,000 947,500 38,171 1,040,000 1,040,000 1,581,000 1,581,000 6700-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 0 3,297 3,488 1,582,000 947,500 38,171 1,040,000 1,040,000 1,581,000 1,581,000 6810-CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS 0 0 -6,158 0 6801-TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS 0 0 -6,158 0 6800-TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS 0 0 -6,158 0 7110-TRANSFER TO OTHER FUNDS 356,450 365,000 376,000 376,000 385,000 160,417 396,500 396,500 416,000 416,000 7125-ADMINI CHARGE TO OTHER FUNDS 215,500 222,000 229,000 229,000 238,000 99,167 245,000 245,000 257,000 257,000 7101-TOTAL TRANSFERS 571,950 587,000 605,000 605,000 623,000 259,583 641,500 641,500 673,000 673,000 7100-TOTAL TRANSFERS 571,950 587,000 605,000 605,000 623,000 259,583 641,500 641,500 673,000 673,000 5,744,805 5,997,725 5,933,705 7,717,885 7,469,324 3,020,311 8,141,450 8,141,450 9,054,495 9,054,495 367 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 66: SANITARY SEWER UTILITY OPERATIONS-5365 Public Works Department COMPANY 5300: WATER&SEWER FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND REVENUE 4914 Sewer Charges 6,265,000 6,579,000 6,579,000 6,908,000 6,908,000 7,253,000 7,253,000 4917 Other Sewer 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 100,000 100,000 5010 Investment Earnings 45,000 63,000 63,000 63,000 63,000 63,000 63,000 Total 6,370,000 6,702,000 6,702,000 7,031,000 7,031,000 7,416,000 7,416,000 SALARIES 6110 Regular Employees 572,175 548,935 568,935 599,300 599,300 617,770 617,770 6112 Salary-Seasonal Temp(2 seasonal 20wks=1600hrs) 19,600 24,800 24,800 25,600 25,600 29,700 29,700 6113 Overtime-Reg 34,000 34,850 34,850 23,600 23,600 24,100 24,100 6113 Overtime-On Call Program 15,500 15,900 15,900 16,400 16,400 16,900 16,900 6123 Salaries-Other 15,960 21,045 - 17,995 17,995 18,515 18,515 6138 Medicare 8,945 9,360 9,360 9,900 9,900 10,250 10,250 6139 FICA 38,255 40,020 40,020 42,340 42,340 43,835 43,835 6141 Pension-PERA 44,805 46,555 46,555 49,300 49,300 50,795 50,795 6142 Worker's Compensation 18,455 22,430 22,430 22,675 22,675 24,660 24,660 6144 Long-Term Disability Insurance 1,645 1,570 1,570 1,700 1,700 1,750 1,750 6145 Hospital&Life Insurance 119,570 125,810 125,810 128,520 128,520 136,020 136,020 Reclasify Position-GIS Tech(w/Water,Eng,Storm) - 3,000 3,000 - - 6170 Employee Paid Premiums - (25,000) (25,000) (25,500) (25,500) (25,500) (25,500) Total 888,910 869,275 868,230 911,830 911,830 948,795 948,795 6210 OFFICE SUPPLIES General Office Supplies 250 300 300 300 300 300 300 Total 250 300 300 300 300 300 300 6211 SMALL TOOL&EQUIPMENT Small Tools 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 Electric/Air Power Tools 435 440 440 450 450 450 450 Oxygen Detector Replacement 900 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,200 1,200 !pad and Laptop Purchase/Replacements 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 Chain Hoist,Sling and Strap Eqiup Replace 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 Annual Lift Station Flush Valve Replacement 11,400 11,400 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 New Line Locator 8,000 8,000 Lift 10 Mixed Flush Valve 3,500 Lift 7 Mixed Flush Valve 3,500 Arrow Board Replacement 4,000 4,000 4,000 4-Ton Iron Worker Fabrication Machine(50/50 W/S) 2,500 Radar Replacement Instead of Transducer 3,000 Total 21,335 20,540 20,540 22,650 22,650 26,850 26,850 6212 MOTOR FUELS/OILS Nolead Fuel 6,500 6,800 6,800 10,600 10,600 9,000 9,000 Diesel Fuel 8,000 7,500 7,500 9,200 9,200 8,000 8,000 Diesel Fuel Tax 500 350 350 350 350 350 350 Fluids,Coolant,Miscellaneous 1,000 850 850 900 900 1,000 1,000 Oil 1,000 850 850 900 900 1,000 1,000 Total 17,000 16,350 16,350 21,950 21,950 19,350 19,350 6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS Vehicle:Sewer Truck/Pump,Hose 11,775 11,800 11,800 11,850 11,850 11,850 11,850 Lift Stations:Pump Seals,Impellers,Valves,Filters 19,000 19,000 19,000 19,500 19,500 20,000 20,000 Generators:Standby&Portable 2,050 2,100 2,100 2,100 2,100 2,600 2,600 General/Other: 2,050 2,100 2,100 2,100 2,100 2,100 2,100 Total 34,875 35,000 35,000 35,550 35,550 36,550 36,550 6216 EQUIPMENT-TIRES/BATTERIES Batteries-Vehicles 475 500 500 550 550 550 550 Batteries-RTUs,UPSs,Controls 475 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Tires 3,175 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,100 3,100 Total 4,125 4,500 4,500 4,550 4,550 4,650 4,650 6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES Safety:PPE,Cones 1,590 1,600 1,600 1,800 1,800 2,000 2,000 Shop:Nut/bolts,Cleaner 980 950 950 950 950 950 950 Field:CPR,Grout,Paint 2,575 2,575 2,575 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 Excavation:Fill,Seed 1,275 1,275 1,275 1,300 1,300 1,400 1,400 General Division Supplies 3,600 3,600 3,600 3,500 3,500 3,500 _ 3,500 Total 10,020 10,000 10,000 10,150 10,150 10,450 10,450 6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES Sanitary System Modeling Services 8,200 8,200 8,200 8,200 8,200 8,300 8,300 Engineering Costs Not Assessed 3,600 3,600 3,600 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 Audit 11,500 10,650 10,650 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 OSHA Required Tests 725 725 725 850 850 900 900 Total 24,025 23,175 23,175 24,050 24,050 24,200 24,200 6237 TELEPHONES/PAGERS Cellular Phone 1,640 1,850 1,850 2,000 2,000 2,100 2,100 Wireless Air Card - - 800 3,600 3,600 3,900 3,900 Total 1,640 1,850 2,650 5,600 5,600 6,000 6,000 368 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 66: SANITARY SEWER UTILITY OPERATIONS-5365 Public Works Department COMPANY 5300: WATER&SEWER FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND 6238 POSTAGE/UPS/FEDEX Postage 37,000 12,600 15,500 16,000 16,000 16,500 16,500 Total 37,000 12,600 15,500 16,000 16,000 16,500 16,500 6239 PRINTING/PUBLISHING Assessment Rolls 1,350 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 Educational Materials 500 550 550 550 550 550 550 Total 1,850 1,950 1,950 1,950 1,950 1,950 1,950 6240 C.SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVAL Dumpster Special Waste 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 Total 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES Flow Monitor/Smoke Test-I/I Investigation 4,500 4,500 4,500 1,300 1,300 4,500 4,500 Print/Mail Sewer Bills 17,500 17,500 17,500 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Meter Reading 5,000 - - - - Sewer Lateral Repairs(moved to 6269) 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 - - Aerial Photography Dakota Co JPA 900 950 950 1,050 1,050 1,100 1,100 Add MH on Sewer Main at 12825 Germain Ave for Duplex's - - - 8,000 8,000 Add MH on Sewer Main for Old Chicago/Americinn Service - - - 8,000 8,000 Traffic Control 800 850 850 900 900 1,000 1,000 TESTT Electrical Equipment testing 3,200 3,200 3,200 3,200 Total 33,700 28,800 28,800 29,250 29,250 11,600 11,600 6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC Lift Stations-Sanitary 29,500 28,000 28,000 28,500 28,500 29,000 29,000 Total 29,500 28,000 28,000 28,500 28,500 29,000 29,000 6256 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS Lift Station Generators 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,100 1,100 1,200 1,200 Total 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,100 1,100 1,200 1,200 6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT Vehicle 5,500 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,500 3,500 Lift Stations:Electrical,Pumps,Controls,PLC,Radio 26,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,500 22,500 Generators:Inspect,Maintenace,load bank 3,000 3,200 3,200 3,200 3,200 5,000 5,000 Lift 2,Replace Valve Vault Drain - - - 2,500 2,500 General/Other 4,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 Total 38,500 31,200 31,200 33,700 33,700 34,000 _ 34,000 6269 REPAIRS-OTHER Repair Sanitary Lines/services-(CIPP,Spot Repair or Top Hat) 8,000 8,000 8,000 10,000 10,000 25,000 25,000 Manholes-Repairs/sealing and replace 9,750 9,750 9,750 9,750 9,750 25,500 25,500 Repair/Seal Sanitary Manhole Structures(added to above line item) 15,750 15,750 15,750 15,750 15,750 - _ - Total 33,500 33,500 33,500 35,500 35,500 50,500 50,500 6275 SCHOOL/CONF/EXP-LOCAL Schools&Certifications 2,000 2,100 2,100 2,800 2,800 3,500 3,500 MWOA Annual 550 650 650 725 725 800 800 ESRI,GIS,Cartegraph training(CMF GIS Staff) 500 500 500 MPWA Spring/Fall Conferences-Director&Superintendent 400 815 815 825 825 850 850 Career Development 1,000 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 5,000 5,000 CDL Training(split Water,Sanitary&Storm) 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 Total 3,950 5,065 5,565 9,850 9,850 14,650 14,650 6276 SCHOOL/CONF/EXP-OTHER Cartegraph Nat Conference-every other year(w/water&storm) 1,200 1,200 - - Total - - - 1,200 1,200 - - 6277 MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE 50%Superintendent 200 200 200 200 200 300 300 Billing Training 200 200 200 200 200 300 300 Total 400 400 400 400 400 600 600 6278 SUBSISTENCE ALLOWANCE MWOAAnnual/MWRA 450 450 450 550 550 600 600 Total 450 450 450 550 550 600 600 6280 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS MWOA&APWA Dues 340 350 350 400 400 500 500 SUSA Dues(50/50 Water&Sewer) - - - 150 150 175 175 Cartegraph Support&Hosting 8,240 8,500 8,500 8,905 8,905 9,350 9,350 SCADA hosting/Opworks(split with Water,sanitary&Storm) 2,000 6,200 6,200 6,200 6,200 Asset Management Citizen App Annual Fee(Split PW/Water/Storm) 5,000 5,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Certification Renewal Fee 300 350 350 375 375 450 450 Korterra GSOC Ticket Management Annual - - 650 650 750 750 Total 13,880 14,200 13,200 18,030 18,030 18,675 18,675 6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE Uniforms Employees 3,000 3,200 3,200 3,800 3,800 3,900 3,900 Total 3,000 3,200 3,200 3,800 3,800 3,900 3,900 6310 RENTAL EXPENSE General Rental 325 350 350 550 550 550 550 Total 325 350 350 550 550 550 550 6311 INSURANCE General,Auto,Property,Liability 108,000 110,000 110,000 113,000 113,000 116,000 116,000 Total 108,000 110,000 110,000 113,000 113,000 116,000 116,000 6317 METRO WASTE CONTROL Metropolitan Council-Environmental Services Waste Water Treatment Charges 3,012,000 3,387,344 3,387,344 3,761,215 3,761,215 3,949,000 3,949,000 Total 3,012,000 3,387,344 3,387,344 3,761,215 3,761,215 3,949,000 3,949,000 369 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 66: SANITARY SEWER UTILITY OPERATIONS-5365 Public Works Department COMPANY 5300: WATER&SEWER FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND 6318 BURNSVILLE/EAGAN SEWER CHRG Burnsville 35,000 36,000 36,000 37,000 37,000 37,500 37,500 Eagan 52,000 54,000 54,000 55,000 55,000 55,500 55,500 Total 87,000 90,000 90,000 92,000 92,000 93,000 _ 93,000 6399 OTHER CHARGES LOGIS 98,600 100,000 100,000 105,500 105,500 109,400 109,400 Water Meter Customer Portal-Annual Fees(50/50 Water&Sewer) 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,250 16,250 16,500 16,500 Yearly Hosting Fee(AMI Support)(50/50 Water&Sewer) - 7,500 7,500 7,600 7,600 7,700 7,700 GSOC Locates(added)Split Water,Wewer,Wtorm - 3,000 3,000 3,100 3,100 3,200 3,200 Invoice Cloud Imbedding in Portal 2,750 2,800 2,800 2,800 2,800 2,850 2,850 Infosense SL-DOG Portal 800 975 915 975 975 975 975 Total 118,150 130,275 130,215 136,225 136,225 140,625 140,625 6351 CREDIT CARD FEES Annual Fee 27,000 34,000 37,000 38,000 38,000 38,500 38,500 Total 27,000 34,000 37,000 38,000 38,000 38,500 38,500 6610 DEPRECIATION Sanitary 977,000 1,003,000 1,003,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 Total 977,000 1,003,000 1,003,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 6730 CAPITAL OUTLAY-VEHICLES 2024 Replace TV Van(422)-Sanitary and Storm 75,000 75,000 Replace Portable Generator(452) 65,000 65,000 Replace Skid Steer Attachment 26,000 26,000 2023 Add Vehicle-1 Ton Utility Dump Truck(With Water) 45,000 45,000 2022 Upgrade Easement Equipment(trade in 403 VersaVac trailer) 72,000 72,000 Track Skid Steer(With Water,Storm,Streets) 13,000 2021 Replace 412 3/4 Ton Vehicle(Toolbox,Plow) 43,500 Replace 414 3/4 Ton Vehicle(Toolbox,Plow) 43,500 Replace 427 Changeable Message Board 19,000 Total 106,000 85,000 72,000 45,000 45,000 166,000 166,000 6735 CAPITAL OUTLAY-OTHER IMP Fiber Installation Project 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 2024 SCADA system upgrade 300,000 300,000 CIPP Lining 134th Street 225,000 225,000 Sanitary Lift Station 11 control panel 100,000 100,000 Greenleaf 4th Addition Phase 1 650,000 650,000 WhitneyDr.-Gardenview to Redwood 100,000 100,000 2023 CIPP Line Sanitary Townhome Mains 142nd St Ct 200,000 200,000 Lift Station 10 New Control Panel 120,000 120,000 New Portable 4"Pump(Sanitary,Storm) 15,000 15,000 142nd St.(Cedar to Galaxie) 50,000 50,000 AV 3rd Walnut Ln(Elm Dr.-Park Ln)EdwoodLn,Park Ln 570,000 570,000 2022 CIPP Line Sanitary-Townhome M.ains 143rd St.Ct. 200,000 200,000 Redwood Drive/Juniper Lane 389,500 389,500 Greenleaf 6th and 7th(Euclid Ct,Eveleth Ct,139th St.Ct)Phase 1 225,000 225,000 2021 Inter-Community Flow Meter Eagan 35,000 Lift 2 Grinder Pump Installation 60,000 Lift SCADA Upgrade Software Hardware Repeaters 250,000 CIPP End to End Line 146th St Ct(7 lines) 200,000 2021 Street&Utility(Cim Phase 2;133rd Gal-Fstaff)) 891,000 500,000 Total 1,476,000 854,500 1,354,500 995,000 995,000 1,415,000 _ 1,415,000 7110 TRANSFERS TO OTHER FUNDS Annual Transfer to General Fund 376,000 385,000 385,000 396,500 396,500 416,000 _ 416,000 Total 376,000 385,000 385,000 396,500 396,500 416,000 416,000 7125 ADMIN CHARGE TO OTHER FUNDS Annual Admin Charge to General Fund 229,000 238,000 238,000 245,000 245,000 257,000 257,000 Total 229,000 238,000 238,000 245,000 245,000 257,000 257,000 Total Net of Personnel 6,828,975 6,592,049 7,085,189 7,229,620 7,229,620 8,105,700 8,105,700 TOTAL EXPENSES $ 7,717,885 $ 7,461,324 $ 7,953,419 $ 8,141,450 $ 8,141,450 $ 9,054,495 $ 9,054,495 LESS CAPITAL OUTLAY $ (1,582,000) $ (939,500) $ (1,426,500) $ (1,040,000) $ (1,040,000) $ (1,581,000) $ (1,581,000) Total Exp without Capital Outlay $ 6,135,885 $ 6,521,824 $ 6,526,919 $ 7,101,450 $ 7,101,450 $ 7,473,495 $ 7,473,495 370 ••• •••• ••••• ••• AppValley Notes: 371 COMPANY DEPARTMENT BUSINESS UNIT ACTIVITY 5500 69 5505 STORM DRAINAGE UTILITY Public Works DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY The Storm Drainage Utility provides funding for the operation and maintenance of the City's storm water drainage system and management of surface water bodies. A majority of expenses for this business unit relate to improvement projects to fulfill State and Federal mandates for pollutant load reductions to lakes, maintenance of the municipal drainage system, drainage costs related to the annual street improvement program, and acquisition of drainage easements. SERVICE CATEGORIES The Storm Drainage Utility Division provides for the operation and maintenance of the municipal storm drainage system within the City of Apple Valley. The City's drainage system controls and conveys drainage from an average precipitation of just over 31-inches each year. This utility service is provide by City Public Works Department staff using city- owned equipment and contract services for capital improvement projects and related services. The following services are provided within this division. 1. Drainage System Maintenance Services • Provide repair and maintenance for 8,240 storm sewer manholes/catch basins and 170 miles of storm sewer pipe within the drainage network • Inspect and remove accumulated sediment from 320 storm water management ponds and best management practices located throughout the drainage system within the City. • Inspect and maintain 12 storm water pumping stations and associated force main 2. System Flood Control Services • Monitor water levels in lakes and ponds in response to severe precipitation events • Perform drainage analysis to determine solutions to flooding events • Review building plans to ensure proper structure elevations above high water levels 3. System Management and Regulatory Services • Prepare mandatory MS4 permit documents and respond to evolving requirements associated with the Federal Clean Water Act • Perform water quality testing for surface water bodies • Coordinate storm water management activities with Vermillion River Watershed Management Organization • Coordinate surface water improvement projects in conjunction with the City of Burnsville. Provide funds for payment of annual dues for required membership to the Black Dog Watershed Management Organization 372 MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2023 AND 2024 Work plans are designed to meet Federal and State mandates for storm water quality which continue to increase at escalating rates. Similar to many other cities, the utility will be financially strained in future years to meet increased regulations and required capital investments for storm water management demands. Due to planned road reconstruction projects inside the Keller Lake Watershed area, additional grant funds for innovative stormwater improvements will be sought for new practices in neighborhoods for 2023 and 2024. MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2023 • Maintain compliance with Federal and State mandates for storm water quality. • Obtain new permit coverage and update processes and City ordinances to meet the City's new MS4 requirements. • Seek additional grant funding for new stormwater practices in reconstruction areas to alleviate flooding and water quality issues in the TMDL watersheds: East Lake and Long/Farquar Lake. • Implement innovative stormwater improvements in the planned road reconstruction projects. MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2024 • Maintain compliance with Federal and State mandates for storm water quality. • Implement innovative stormwater improvements in the planned road reconstruction projects inside the TMDL watersheds: Alimagnet Lake and East Lake. • The City will continue to seek additional grants to assist with funding water quality improvements in our TMDL areas, and to maximize cost savings by coordinating projects with other City capital improvement projects where feasible. IMPACT MEASURES / PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual Actual Actual Projected Projected Projected Item 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Staff hours to address State 3,400 3,520 3,500 3,500 3,400 3,400 MS4 Permit Requirements Number of lake water quality samples 60 225 250 250 250 250 Number of Mandated TMDL 5 6 6 6 6 6 Studies Active in City* *Long & Farquar TMDL: Alimagnet Keller East Lake (Lakeville) Lower Miss Fecal Coliform South Metro Mississippi TSS 373 Regular Status Personnel Schedule- FTE's Adopted Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Position Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Water Quality Tech 1 1 0 0 0 0 Water Resources Specialist 0 0 1 1 1 1 GIS Coordinator 0 0 0 0.25 0.25 0.25 GIS Tech 0.25 0.25 0.25 0 0 0 FTE split w/ 1510/5300/5365 Natural Resources Tech 0.50 0.50 0.5 0.50 0.50 0.5 FTE split with 1500 Maintenance I/II 1 1 1 1 1 1 Exist Position from 1600 Summary Budget Department 69 Storm Drainage 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Revenue: Utility Charges 2,112,483 2,341,478 2,584,221 2,391,000 2,630,000 2,893,000 3,182,000 Grants 480,027 13,104 183,451 140,000 190,000 320,000 250,000 Other Revenue 1,242 5,250 3,271 5,000 - - - Contributed Revnue(Trunk Fees) 207,746 40,166 120 - - - - Transfer from FCPF - - 300,000 - 300,000 - - Investment Earnings 87,371 60,526 (10,570) 15,000 10,000 10,000 5,000 2,888,869 2,460,524 3,060,493 2,551,000 3,130,000 3,223,000 3,437,000 Expenditures: Salaries&Wages 166,501 189,834 196,093 236,185 224,985 208,615 218,405 Employee Benefits 32,292 52,510 49,135 55,730 56,040 50,225 53,310 Supplies 38,099 33,919 36,600 53,055 49,690 56,925 65,650 Contractual Services 383,045 241,404 243,970 498,650 573,325 591,635 549,000 Utilities 91,907 78,123 41,019 75,800 77,800 78,300 80,850 Repairs&Maint.enance 54,581 2,055 15,774 60,050 55,100 58,100 54,450 Training/Travel/Dues 9,744 9,663 8,697 19,670 21,090 28,015 29,450 Other Expenses 17,417 20,532 22,978 23,550 39,900 39,800 41,950 Depreciation 1,066,399 1,148,799 1,156,846 1,154,000 1,191,000 1,241,000 1,301,000 Debt Service-Interest 26,306 22,802 19,202 21,700 18,100 86,300 80,490 Other Not Capitalized 3,745 15,696 4,332 1,887,000 1,480,500 1,780,000 3,545,000 Admin Fee to General Fund 360,000 370,000 380,000 380,000 389,500 401,000 421,000 Debt Service-Principal - - - 180,000 190,000 265,000 270,000 Total Exp 2,250,035 2,185,337 2,174,646 4,645,390 4,367,030 4,884,915 6,710,555 Net Income 638,834 275,187 885,847 (2,094,390) (1,237,030) (1,661,915) (3,273,555) Net change in cash Add Depreciation 1,066,399 1,148,799 1,156,846 1,154,000 1,191,000 1,241,000 1,301,000 Bonds Issued - - - - - 2,000,000 2,000,000 Debt Service-Principal(not above) (180,000) (185,000) (185,000) - - - - Cap. Outlay-Not Above (1,763,489) (2,441,322) (2,441,322) - - - (capitalized) Net Change in Cash (238,256) (1,202,336) (583,629) (940,390) (46,030) 1,579,085 27,445 374 Debt Service Schedule: Bonds of 2015b Total Year Principal Interest Principal Interest 2018 180,000 32,388 180,000 32,388 2019 175,000 28,788 175,000 28,788 2020 180,000 25,288 180,000 25,288 2021 180,000 21,688 180,000 21,688 2022 190,000 18,088 190,000 18,088 2023 190,000 14,288 190,000 14,288 2024 195,000 10,488 195,000 10,488 2025 200,000 6,588 200,000 6,588 2026 115,000 2,588 115,000 2,588 2023 Capital Equipment Mini Excavator $ 35,000 2023 Capital Outlay Easement Acquisition $ 50,000 Sediment Removal 90,000 General Stormwater Improvements 110,000 WVW Priority Projects of East Lake Assessment Study 300,000 Lac Lavon Parking Lot BMP 45,000 EVR-P7 & P55 Outlet Mods/ Infiltration Bench Improvements 100,000 WVW Priority Projects (Regatta Park Pond) 300,000 Portable 4" Pump 15,000 Street & Utility Improvement 550,000 Hunters Woods Lift Station Rehab 125,000 Hunters Wood Storm Lift Panel Upgrade 60,000 $1,745,000 $1,780,000 2024 Capital Equipment Replace TV Van $ 25,000 2024 Capital Outlay Easement Acquisition $ 70,000 Sediment Removal 100,000 General Stormwater Improvements 300,000 Greenleaf 4th Addition Phase 1 550,000 Whitney Dr Garden view to Redwood 490,000 Central Village - Street Overlays 125,000 Ring Route Blvd. Streetscape Improvements 200,000 Misc. Storm Lift Station Pump Repairs 50,000 Outlet modifications EVR P-1, P-2 (Long/Farquar) 35,000 P-55 Outlet Modifications (Long/Farquar) 150,000 Farquar Lift Phase 1 Dominica Way Culvert/Dredging 600,000 Whitney Pond expansion (Keller Lake) 850,000 $3,520,000 $3,545,000 City of Apple Valley 375 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) STORM DRAINAGE UTILITY 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6110-SALARY-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 163,830 181,164 192,438 206,240 196,085 74,915 191,325 191,325 201,570 201,570 6112-SALARY-SEASONAL TEMP 1,104 1,737 125 799 6113-OVERTIME-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 12,508 7,153 5,551 22,600 22,600 4,602 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 6118-VACATION PAY -10,942 -333 -1,080 0 6121-INSURANCE CASH BENEFIT 360 720 720 360 6122-COMP REQUEST -359 -607 -1,660 -1,974 6123-SALARY-OTHER 7,345 6,300 7,290 7,290 6,835 6,835 6105-SALARIES AND WAGES 166,501 189,834 196,093 236,185 224,985 78,701 208,615 208,615 218,405 218,405 6138-MEDICARE 2,531 2,750 2,853 3,425 3,220 1,136 3,025 3,025 3,215 3,215 6139-FICA 10,822 11,756 12,197 14,645 13,765 4,859 12,935 12,935 13,745 13,745 6141-PENSIONS-PERA 12,247 14,080 14,724 17,715 16,650 5,815 15,645 15,645 16,380 16,380 6142-WORKERS COMPENSATION 8,781 6,679 8,599 5,410 8,345 1,997 3,640 3,640 4,000 4,000 6144-LONG-TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE 73 145 130 650 550 56 545 545 575 575 6145-MEDICAL INSURANCE -2,543 16,491 10,024 13,885 13,510 4,103 14,435 14,435 15,395 15,395 6146-DENTAL INSURANCE 302 604 602 275 6147-LIFE INSURANCE-BASIC 3 6 7 9 6148-LIFE INSURANCE-SUPP/DEPEND 77 0 0 0 6125-EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 32,292 52,510 49,135 55,730 56,040 18,251 50,225 50,225 53,310 53,310 6100-TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 198,793 242,344 245,228 291,915 281,025 96,952 258,840 258,840 271,715 271,715 6211-SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT -9 101 742 275 1,800 197 1,350 1,350 11,350 11,350 6212-MOTOR FUELS/OILS 7,296 5,760 10,864 8,820 8,840 5,434 15,225 15,225 12,550 12,550 6214-CHEMICALS 230 0 0 0 0 0 6215-EQUIPMENT-PARTS 28,458 21,319 14,119 33,610 30,000 14,861 31,000 31,000 32,200 32,200 6216-VEHICLES-TIRES/BATTERIES 1,896 0 1,132 6229-GENERAL SUPPLIES 2,124 4,844 10,874 10,350 9,050 632 9,350 9,350 9,550 9,550 6205-SUPPLIES 38,099 33,919 36,600 53,055 49,690 22,256 56,925 56,925 65,650 65,650 6231-LEGAL SERVICES 436 0 0 0 0 0 6234-CITY ENGINEER CONSULTANT SERV 14,076 6,949 6,216 20,000 22,000 655 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 6234-CITY ENGINEER CONSULTANT SERV 11,205 0 0 0 6235-CONSULTANT SERVICES 90,953 19,813 54,535 69,400 116,800 21,094 97,600 97,600 82,600 82,600 6235-CONSULTANT SERVICES 3,660 324 0 0 6237-TELEPHONE/PAGERS 1,283 2,102 1,788 2,250 2,325 986 2,135 2,135 2,200 2,200 6238-POSTAGE/UPS/FEDEX 107 0 0 0 6239-PRINTING 1,645 426 0 5,300 5,300 107 5,350 5,350 5,400 5,400 6240-CLEANING SERVICE/GARBAGE 32,128 27,365 19,504 31,700 32,300 9,275 33,000 33,000 33,000 33,000 6249-OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 227,554 184,426 161,927 370,000 394,600 22,184 430,550 430,550 402,800 402,800 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 368,180 241,080 243,970 498,650 573,325 54,300 591,635 591,635 549,000 549,000 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 14,865 324 0 0 6255-UTILITIES-ELECTRIC 91,907 78,123 41,019 75,800 77,800 27,424 78,300 78,300 80,850 80,850 6250-UTILITIES 91,907 78,123 41,019 75,800 77,800 27,424 78,300 78,300 80,850 80,850 6265-REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 32,866 -2,632 10,402 27,550 23,100 104,282 23,100 23,100 17,450 17,450 6266-REPAIRS-BUILDING 0 0 3,637 0 6269-REPAIRS-OTHER 21,714 4,687 1,735 32,500 32,000 1,135 35,000 35,000 37,000 37,000 6260-REPAIRS AND MAINTENA 54,581 2,055 15,774 60,050 55,100 105,417 58,100 58,100 54,450 54,450 6275-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXP LOCAL 961 1,590 476 5,610 6,125 0 8,635 8,635 10,630 10,630 6276-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXPOTHER 859 0 0 258 1,200 1,200 0 0 6277-MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE 0 0 0 130 130 0 50 50 50 50 6278-SUBSISTENCE ALLOWANCE 75 0 0 0 6280-DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 7,271 7,884 8,121 13,120 14,015 8,989 17,630 17,630 18,170 18,170 6281-UNIFORM/CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 578 189 100 810 820 0 500 500 600 600 6270-TRNGITRAVL/DUES/UNIF 9,744 9,663 8,697 19,670 21,090 9,247 28,015 28,015 29,450 29,450 City of Apple Valley 376 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) STORM DRAINAGE UTILITY 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 562,511 364,841 346,060 707,225 777,005 218,644 812,975 812,975 779,400 779,400 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 14,865 324 0 0 6310-RENTAL EXPENSE 275 3,145 52 1,350 1,600 275 1,700 1,700 1,750 1,750 6311-INSURANCE-PROPERTY/LIABILITY 16,900 17,400 21,000 21,000 34,000 14,167 34,000 34,000 36,000 36,000 6333-GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS -8 -13 -21 -11 6399-OTHER CHARGES 250 0 1,946 1,200 4,300 1,032 4,100 4,100 4,200 4,200 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES 17,417 20,532 22,978 23,550 39,900 15,462 39,800 39,800 41,950 41,950 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES 17,417 20,532 22,978 23,550 39,900 15,462 39,800 39,800 41,950 41,950 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 6610-DEPRECIATION 1,066,399 1,148,799 1,156,846 1,154,000 1,191,000 34,568 1,241,000 1,241,000 1,301,000 1,301,000 6601-TOTAL DEPRECIATION 1,066,399 1,148,799 1,156,846 1,154,000 1,191,000 34,568 1,241,000 1,241,000 1,301,000 1,301,000 6600-TOTAL DEPRECIATION 1,066,399 1,148,799 1,156,846 1,154,000 1,191,000 34,568 1,241,000 1,241,000 1,301,000 1,301,000 6730-CAPITAL OUTLAY-TRANSPORTATION 0 0 0 0 13,000 0 35,000 35,000 25,000 25,000 6735-CAPITAL OUTLAY-OTHER IMPROVEME 0 0 0 1,887,000 1,467,500 10,484 1,945,000 1,745,000 4,250,000 3,520,000 6701-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 0 0 0 1,887,000 1,480,500 10,484 1,980,000 1,780,000 4,275,000 3,545,000 6701-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 0 0 0 0 6700-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 0 0 0 1,887,000 1,480,500 10,484 1,980,000 1,780,000 4,275,000 3,545,000 6700-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 0 0 0 0 6810-CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS 0 15,696 4,332 -3,780 6815-EASEMENT/CONDEMNATION 3,745 0 0 0 6801-TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS 3,745 15,696 4,332 -3,780 6801-TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS 0 0 0 0 6800-TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS 3,745 15,696 4,332 -3,780 6800-TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS 0 0 0 0 6910-BOND PRINCIPAL 0 0 0 180,000 190,000 0 190,000 265,000 195,000 270,000 6901-TOTAL DEBT SERVICE 0 0 0 180,000 190,000 0 190,000 265,000 195,000 270,000 6900-TOTAL DEBT SERVICE 0 0 0 180,000 190,000 0 190,000 265,000 195,000 270,000 7015-DEBT SERVICE-INTEREST 26,306 22,802 19,202 21,700 18,100 9,044 14,300 86,300 10,490 80,490 7001-TOTAL INTEREST AND FISCAL FEES 26,306 22,802 19,202 21,700 18,100 9,044 14,300 86,300 10,490 80,490 7000-TOTAL INTEREST AND FISCAL FEES 26,306 22,802 19,202 21,700 18,100 9,044 14,300 86,300 10,490 80,490 7125-ADMINI CHARGE TO OTHER FUNDS 360,000 370,000 380,000 380,000 389,500 162,292 401,000 401,000 421,000 421,000 7101-TOTAL TRANSFERS 360,000 370,000 380,000 380,000 389,500 162,292 401,000 401,000 421,000 421,000 7101-TOTAL TRANSFERS 0 0 0 0 7100-TOTAL TRANSFERS 360,000 370,000 380,000 380,000 389,500 162,292 401,000 401,000 421,000 421,000 7100-TOTAL TRANSFERS 0 0 0 0 2,250,035 2,185,337 2,174,646 4,645,390 4,367,030 543,666 4,937,915 4,884,915 7,295,555 6,710,555 377 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 69: STORM DRAINAGE UTILITY-5505 Public Works Department COMPANY 5500: STORM DRAIN UTILITY JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND REVENUE 4150 Grants-Other Govt Units 140,000 190,000 114,000 41,300 320,000 250,000 675,000 4918 Storm Drainage Charges 2,391,000 2,630,000 2,630,000 2,893,000 2,893,000 3,182,000 3,182,000 5010 Investment Interest 15,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 5,000 5,000 5499 Transfer from other funds - 300,000 - - - Bond Issue Proceeds - - 2,000,000 - 2,000,000 2,000,000 5399 Other Miscellaneous Revenue(NRMP Permits) 5,000 - - - Total 2,551,000 3,130,000 4,754,000 2,944,300 5,223,000 3,437,000 5,862,000 SALARIES 6110 Regular Employees 206,240 193,085 199,385 191,325 191,325 201,570 201,570 6113 Overtime-Reg 22,600 22,600 22,600 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 6123 Salaries-Other 7,345 6,300 - 7,290 7,290 6,835 6,835 6138 Medicare 3,425 3,220 3,220 3,025 3,025 3,215 3,215 6139 FICA 14,645 13,765 13,765 12,935 12,935 13,745 13,745 6141 Pension-PERA 17,715 16,650 16,650 15,645 15,645 16,380 16,380 6142 Worker's Compensation 5,410 8,345 8,345 3,640 3,640 4,000 4,000 6144 Long-Term Disability Insurance 650 550 550 545 545 575 575 6145 Hospital&Life Insurance 13,885 13,510 13,510 14,435 14,435 15,395 15,395 Position Changes-Reclass GIS Tech(w/Sewer,Water,Eng) - 3,000 3,000 Total 291,915 281,025 281,025 258,840 258,840 271,715 271,715 6211 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT UPS Replacement - 1,500 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Small Tools for Water Quality 275 300 200 350 350 350 350 Air Relief Valve replacements(ARV) 10,000 10,000 Total 275 1,800 1,200 1,350 1,350 11,350 11,350 6212 MOTOR FUELS/OILS No Lead Fuel 820 600 600 925 925 850 850 Diesel Fuel 6,600 7,740 8,330 13,000 13,000 11,000 11,000 Diesel Fuel Tax 400 - - - - - Fluids,Coolant,Miscellaenous 500 200 200 400 400 200 200 Oil 500 300 300 900 900 500 500 Total 8,820 8,840 9,430 15,225 15,225 12,550 12,550 6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS Pumps Seals,Impellers,Valves,etc. 10,000 5,625 5,600 6,025 6,025 6,500 6,500 Air Relief Valve Parts 950 975 975 975 975 1,000 1,000 Sweeper Parts-Transfer from Streets 13,390 13,800 13,000 14,000 14,000 14,400 14,400 Sweeper Brooms-Transfer from Streets 9,270 9,600 9,600 10,000 10,000 10,300 10,300 Total 33,610 30,000 29,175 31,000 31,000 32,200 32,200 6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES Catch Basin Castings,Mortar,Rings,Grates 3,500 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,050 3,050 Safety Equipment-PPE 200 200 200 300 300 300 300 Pond Outlet Debris Fence 900 950 500 1,050 1,050 1,000 1,000 Chimney Patch,RipRap,Matting 2,800 1,900 1,900 2,000 2,000 2,100 2,100 Water Quality General Supplies 950 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,100 1,100 Public Property/Easement Signs 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Total 10,350 9,050 8,600 9,350 9,350 9,550 9,550 6234 CITY ENGINEER CONSULTING SERVICES Engineering Services 20,000 22,000 22,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 Total 20,000 22,000 22,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES Long/Farquar'EVR-P7&P55 Outlet Mods/Infiltration Bench Improvements(study) 30,000 Feasibility Study/Design-Whitney Pond Expansion 50,000 50,000 Feasibility Study/Design for Pond Expansion KL-P4(Arby's) 25,000 25,000 Drainage Modeling/TMDL Assistance 40,000 40,000 40,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 MN Stormwater Coalition 2,200 2,100 1,850 2,100 2,100 2,100 2,100 Blackdog WMO Annual Dues 16,000 13,000 12,000 13,300 13,300 13,300 13,300 Water Quality Analysis&Testing 7,000 7,500 7,500 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 Pond Debris Testing 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 Cedar Knolls Storm Lift Easement Acquisition - - - - 10,000 10,000 Survey Staking for Easement Signs 3,000 3,000 1,300 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 Total 69,400 116,800 143,850 97,600 97,600 82,600 82,600 6237 TELEPHONES/PAGERS Cell Phones 1,550 1,600 1,600 1,610 1,610 1,650 1,650 Wireless Air Card 500 525 525 525 525 550 550 Storm Lift Telephone Lines 200 200 - - - - - Total 2,250 2,325 2,125 2,135 2,135 2,200 2,200 6239 PRINTING/PUBLISHING Educational Mtls for MS4/Blue Thumb 600 600 200 650 650 700 700 Educational Mtls for TMDL Requirement(Includes 6249 in 2021) 4,700 4,700 4,700 4,700 4,700 4,700 4,700 Total 5,300 5,300 4,900 5,350 5,350 5,400 5,400 378 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 69: STORM DRAINAGE UTILITY-5505 Public Works Department COMPANY 5500: STORM DRAIN UTILITY JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND 6240 C.SERVICE/GARBAGE REMOVAL Landfill Dumping Fees(from Streets beginning in 2019) 12,500 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 Sump Catch Basin Matl Disposal 15,000 15,100 15,100 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Pond Debris Disposal 4,200 4,200 4,200 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Total 31,700 32,300 32,300 33,000 33,000 33,000 33,000 6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES Lake WO/TMDL Projects >Alimagnet Projects(Per JPA Bumsville) 11,000 12,000 12,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 >Keller Lake Projects(Per JPA Burnsville) 9,500 10,000 10,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 >LacLavon Projects(Per JPA Burnsville) 6,000 6,300 6,300 6,750 6,750 6,750 6,750 >Water Quality CAMP Program 4,500 4,750 4,750 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 >Rain Garden/Shoreline Grant Program 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 >Wetland Health Eval.Program 4,900 5,000 5,000 5,250 5,250 >BMP Maintenance&Fix Erosion 80,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 100,000 100,000 >Iron Enhanced Sand Filter Maintenance 50,000 50,000 - 50,000 50,000 10,000 10,000 Long/Farquar TMDL Implement >Fish Stocking 1,100 800 800 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 >Fish Removal - 10,000 - 10,000 10,000 15,000 15,000 >FarquarWeed Management 8,500 11,000 11,000 12,000 12,000 13,000 13,000 >Long Lake Weed Management 4,000 4,250 4,250 4,500 4,500 5,000 5,000 Lac Lavon,Scout,and Cobblestone Lakes >WQ Monitoring 1,500 1,500 1,500 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 >Lake Management Projects 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 Storm System Operations >Sump CB Cleaning Contract Work 160,000 160,000 160,000 165,000 165,000 166,000 166,000 >Aerial Photos/Pictometry Dakota County JPA 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,050 1,050 1,050 1,050 Storm Water Monitoring Station-Whitney Pond 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,500 20,500 20,500 20,500 Farquar Storm Lift Rehab Design&Inspect Ph 1 2024 - - - 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 Total 370,000 394,600 334,600 430,550 430,550 402,800 402,800 6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC Lift Stations-Storm 75,000 77,000 77,000 77,500 77,500 80,000 80,000 Birger Pond-Elect.&Maint.w/Rsmt 800 800 800 800 800 850 850 Total 75,800 77,800 77,800 78,300 78,300 80,850 80,850 6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT Lift Stations(Pumps,Impellers,Wear Rings) 16,000 11,500 11,500 11,500 11,500 12,000 12,000 Electric Maintenance&Repair/TEGG 9,500 9,500 9,335 9,500 9,500 3,200 3,200 Pump Inspection 1,800 1,850 1,850 1,850 1,850 2,000 2,000 Lake Aeration Equipment 250 250 415 250 250 250 250 Total 27,550 23,100 23,100 23,100 23,100 17,450 17,450 6269 REPAIRS-OTHER Repair Storm Sewer Pipes and Structures 15,000 16,000 16,000 18,000 18,000 20,000 20,000 Catch Basin Casting Repairs 10,000 11,000 11,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 NPDES/BMP Maintenance Projects 7,500 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Total 32,500 32,000 32,000 35,000 35,000 37,000 37,000 6275 SCHOOL/CONF/EXP-LOCAL Wetland Training 900 1,000 200 500 500 500 500 GIS Education(added to line item below) 1,000 1,100 500 - - - - ESRI Conference-Duluth 1,100 1,200 500 1,200 1,200 ESRI,GIS,Cartegraph training(CMF GIS Staff) 500 500 MPWA Spring/Fall Conference-Director 410 425 425 435 435 530 530 MECA Conference 900 1,000 1,000 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 Water Resources Conference 650 700 700 700 700 750 750 Erosion Control Training 650 700 700 700 700 750 750 Career Development 2,500 2,500 CDL Training(split Water,Sanitary&Storm) 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 Total 5,610 6,125 4,025 8,635 8,635 10,630 10,630 6276 SCHOOL/CONF/EXP-OTHER Cartegraph Nat Conference-every other year(w/water&sanitary) 1,200 1,200 - - Total - - - 1,200 1,200 - - 6277 MILEAGE/AUTO Mileage 130 130 130 50 50 50 50 Total 130 130 130 50 50 50 50 6280 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS Asset Management Citizen App(split PW/San/Water)(Annual Fee) 5,000 5,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Cartegraph Support&Hosting 8,120 8,365 8,365 8,780 8,780 9,220 9,220 SCADA Hosting/Opworks(split w/Water&Sanitary) 2,000 6,200 6,200 6,200 6,200 Korterra GSOC Ticket Mgmt Annual(Split w/Water&Sanitary) - 650 650 650 650 750 750 Total 13,120 14,015 13,015 17,630 17,630 18,170 18,170 6281 UNIFORM/CLOTHNG ALLOWANCE Uniforms 810 820 500 500 500 600 600 Total 810 820 500 500 500 600 600 6310 RENTAL EXPENSE Rentals 1,000 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,250 1,250 Home&Garden Expo Booth(Split with Natural Resources 350 400 275 500 500 500 500 Total 1,350 1,600 1,475 1,700 1,700 1,750 1,750 6311 INSURANCE Insurance 21,000 34,000 27,000 34,000 34,000 36,000 36,000 Total 21,000 34,000 27,000 34,000 34,000 36,000 36,000 6399 OTHER CHARGES Water Quality Permits(DNR Permits,Aquatic Weed Removal) 1,200 1,200 300 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 GSOC Locates(Split w/Water&Sanitary) - 3,100 3,100 3,100 3,100 3,200 3,200 Total 1,200 4,300 3,400 4,100 4,100 4,200 4,200 379 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 69: STORM DRAINAGE UTILITY-5505 Public Works Department COMPANY 5500: STORM DRAIN UTILITY JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND 6610 DEPRECIATION Depreciation 1,154,000 1,191,000 1,191,000 1,241,000 1,241,000 1,301,000 1,301,000 Total 1,154,000 1,191,000 1,191,000 1,241,000 1,241,000 1,301,000 1,301,000 6730 CAPITAL OUTLAY-VEHICLES 2024 Replace TV Van(422)-(with Sanitary) 25,000 25,000 2023 Add Mini-Excavator(with Streets/Cemetery) 35,000 35,000 2022 Track Skid Steer(with Streets/Water/Sanitary) 13,000 13,000 Total - 13,000 13,000 35,000 35,000 25,000 25,000 6735 CAPITAL OUTLAY-OTHER IMP Easement Acquisition 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 70,000 70,000 Sediment Removal from Existing Storm Ponds 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 100,000 100,000 General Stormwater Improvements 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 300,000 300,000 2024 Outlet modification EVR P-1,P-2(Long/Farquar) 35,000 35,000 P-55 Outlet Modifications(Long/Farquar) 150,000 150,000 WVW Priority Projects(Hanover Lift Pond Imprvs) 300,000 - Greenleaf 4th Addition Phase 1-Street&Utility 550,000 550,000 Whitney Dr.(Gardenview to Redwood)-Street Recon 490,000 490,000 Central Village-Street Overlays 125,000 125,000 Ring Route Blvd Streetscape Improvements 200,000 200,000 SCADA System Upgrade 300,000 - Misc Storm Lift Station Pump Repairs 50,000 50,000 Belmont Storm Lift Station Control Panel-replace 65,000 - 2023 Lac Lavon Parking Lot BMP 45,000 45,000 EVR-P7&P55 Outlet Mods/Infiltration Bench Improvements 100,000 100,000 WVW Priority Projects(Regatta Park Pond) 300,000 300,000 Whitney Pond Expansion(Keller) - - 850,000 850,000 Farquar Lift Dominica Way Culvert&Dredging(moved to 2024) - - 600,000 600,000 New Portable 4"Pump(with Sanitary) 15,000 15,000 142nd St.(Cedar to Galaxie) 100,000 100,000 AV 3rd Walnut Ln(Elm Dr.-Park Ln)EdwoodLn,Park Ln 450,000 450,000 Hanover Lift Station Control Panel Upgrade(moved to 2024) - - 65,000 - Hunters Woods Lift Station Rehabilitation - 125,000 125,000 Ring Route Blvd Improvements 200,000 - 2022 Pennock/42 Storm Repair 40,000 Briar Oaks Improvements 70,000 100,000 Hunters Wood Panel Upgrade-SCADA(move to 2023) 60,000 - 60,000 60,000 2022 Street&Utility Reconstruction 507,500 507,500 WVW Priority Projects of East Lake Assessment 300,000 - 300,000 300,000 Holyoke Pond&AL-P2.2 Improvements(Alimagnet Retrofits) - - Alimagnet Install Weed/Leaf Device Split$w/Burnsville 30,000 30,000 - 2021 City Hall Pond Improvements 300,000 300,000 60,000 5527 133rd St Ct Pipe Separation 12,000 Hidden Ponds Storm Lift-Replace Pump(2-2021&22)48 HP 20,000 20,000 20,000 CMF Infiltration Basin Repair&Add Sump Catch Basin 25,000 Cobblestone Storm Ceptor-Add Concrete Taper At Base 15,000 Material Lot Storage Bin Canopies 10,000 Garland Ave&Garner Way Raise CB Structure to Grade 6,000 Stormwater Monitoring Improvements(Whitney Pond Ongoing) Pennock Park Improvements(KL-003-031) Pilot Knob Structural Bmp Device for Farquar 160,000 Fawn Ridge Court Insulate Water Service Line 25,000 Alimagnet Park/Edgewood&Reflection Rd Improvements 2021 Street&Utility Reconstruction(Cimarron Ph.2;133rd St.) 704,000 Total 1,957,000 1,467,500 977,500 1,945,000 1,745,000 4,250,000 3,520,000 6910 BOND PRINCIPAL Principal 180,000 190,000 190,000 190,000 265,000 195,000 270,000 Total 180,000 190,000 190,000 190,000 265,000 195,000 270,000 7015 BOND INTEREST Interest 21,700 18,100 18,100 14,300 86,300 10,490 80,490 Total 21,700 18,100 18,100 14,300 86,300 10,490 80,490 7125 ADMIN FEE TO OTHER FUNDS General Fund 380,000 389,500 389,500 401,000 401,000 421,000 421,000 Total 380,000 389,500 389,500 401,000 401,000 421,000 421,000 TOTAL EXPENSES $ 4,715,390 $ 4,367,030 $ 3,830,750 $ 4,937,915 $ 4,884,915 $ 7,295,555 $ 6,710,555 LESS CAPITAL OUTLAY $ (1,957,000) $ (1,480,500) $ (990,500) $ (1,980,000) $ (1,780,000) $ (4,275,000) $ (3,545,000) TOTAL EXPENSE WITHOUT CAPITAL OUTLAY $ 2,758,390 $ 2,886,530 $ 2,840,250 $ 2,957,915 $ 3,104,915 $ 3,020,555 $ 3,165,555 380 ••• •••• ••••• ••• AppValley Notes: 381 COMPANY DEPARTMENT BUSINESS UNIT ACTIVITY 5800 62 5805 STREET LIGHT UTILITY Public Works DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY The Street Light Utility provides funding for the operation and maintenance of the street lights located throughout the City of Apple Valley. Approximately 3,428 street lights are located within the City. Dakota Electric Association maintains approximately 3,116 lights under a fixed rate program and the City owns and maintains approximately 312 lights along Cedar Avenue, Founders/153rd Street and Gaslight Drive. The street light system will continue to expand with future construction of the City's street system. MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2023 The major objective for 2023 within this business unit includes replacement of old HPS (High Pressure Sodium) lights to newer, energy efficient LED (Light Emitting Diode) lights as part of the City's annual street improvement projects. It is also expected that a plan for the aging lighting along CSAH 42 will be developed in conjunction with the County's Corridor Study for 42. MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2024 The major objective for 2024 within this business unit includes continued replacement of old HPS (High Pressure Sodium) lights to newer, energy efficient LED (Light Emitting Diode) lights. This will be coordinated within the annual Street Improvement Program. Additionally, staff will begin the planned replacement of the Ring Route lighting in conjunction with the Ring Route Boulevard Improvements. IMPACT MEASURES / PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual Actual Actual Projected Projected Projected Item 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 No. of DEA Street Lights 3116 3244 3527 3527 3527 3527 No. of City Street Lights 312 315 315 315 315 315 No. of LED Conversions 15 24 20 20 20 20 Regular Status Personnel Schedule—FTE's Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Proposed Position Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 None 382 Summary Budget Street Light Utility- 5800, Dept 62 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Proposed Proposed Proposed Revenue: Utility Charges 555,175 574,731 590,897 566,000 607,000 668,000 735,000 Grants - - - - - - - Other Revenue - - - - - - - Investment Earnings 6,483 7,756 (1,788) 1,000 2,500 2,000 2,000 561,658 582,487 589,109 567,000 609,500 670,000 737,000 Expenditures: Salaries and Wages 1,647 1,611 2,760 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 Employee Benefits 245 238 414 - - - - Supplies 260 3,780 5,799 15,360 16,000 16,700 17,300 Contractual Services 16,375 70,248 45,133 54,820 56,960 56,100 56,150 Utilities 1,528 3,863 7,547 2,200 3,000 3,100 3,200 Utilities for Resale 495,868 419,185 431,704 500,000 455,000 460,000 465,000 Repairs&Maintenance - - - - - - - Training/Travel/Dues 7,271 7,665 7,895 7,895 8,130 8,540 9,000 Other Expense/Insurance 20,500 44,053 21,500 21,500 22,000 25,000 26,000 Capital Outlay - - 45,000 66,000 30,000 250,000 Transfer to Sewer Fund - - - - - - Total Exp. 543,694 550,643 522,752 649,775 630,090 602,440 829,650 Net Increase(decrease) 17,964 31,844 66,357 (82,775) (20,590) 67,560 (92,650) 2023 Capital Outlay Street Project Walnut Lane $ 15,000 Street Project 142nd St $ 15,000 $ 30,000 Continue phased LED street light conversion with annual street projects. 2024 Capital Outlay Street Project- Greenleaf 4th $ 50,000 Street Project-Whitney Dr. $ 15,000 Street Overlay- Central Village $ 35,000 Street Overlay- 127th St. $ 50,000 Ring Route Blvd Improvements $100,000 $250,000 Continue phased LED street light conversion with annual street projects. City of Apple Valley 383 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) STREET LIGHT UTILITY 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6110-SALARY-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 0 0 0 94 6113-OVERTIME-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 1,647 1,611 2,760 3,000 3,000 1,285 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 6105-SALARIES AND WAGES 1,647 1,611 2,760 3,000 3,000 1,379 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 6138-MEDICARE 23 22 39 19 6139-FICA 98 95 168 83 6141-PENSIONS-PERA 124 121 207 103 6125-EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 245 238 414 206 6100-TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 1,892 1,849 3,175 3,000 3,000 1,585 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 6215-EQUIPMENT-PARTS 260 3,780 5,799 15,360 16,000 0 16,700 16,700 17,300 17,300 6205-SUPPLIES 260 3,780 5,799 15,360 16,000 0 16,700 16,700 17,300 17,300 6237-TELEPHONE/PAGERS 1,629 273 347 3,820 4,960 108 4,100 4,100 4,150 4,150 6249-OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 14,746 69,975 44,786 51,000 52,000 7,718 52,000 52,000 52,000 52,000 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 16,375 70,248 45,133 54,820 56,960 7,826 56,100 56,100 56,150 56,150 6255-UTILITIES-ELECTRIC 1,528 3,863 7,547 2,200 3,000 2,552 3,100 3,100 3,200 3,200 6250-UTILITIES 1,528 3,863 7,547 2,200 3,000 2,552 3,100 3,100 3,200 3,200 6260-REPAIRS AND MAINTENA 0 0 0 0 6280-DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 7,271 7,665 7,895 7,895 8,130 8,131 8,540 8,540 9,000 9,000 6270-TRNG/TRAVL/DUES/UNIF 7,271 7,665 7,895 7,895 8,130 8,131 8,540 8,540 9,000 9,000 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 25,433 85,556 66,374 80,275 84,090 18,510 84,440 84,440 85,650 85,650 6311-INSURANCE-PROPERTY/LIABILITY 20,500 21,500 21,500 21,500 22,000 9,167 25,000 25,000 26,000 26,000 6349-LATE FEES/FINANCE CHARGES 307 0 0 6399-OTHER CHARGES 22,246 0 0 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES 20,500 44,053 21,500 21,500 22,000 9,167 25,000 25,000 26,000 26,000 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES 20,500 44,053 21,500 21,500 22,000 9,167 25,000 25,000 26,000 26,000 6545-NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE 495,868 419,185 431,704 500,000 455,000 229,451 460,000 460,000 465,000 465,000 6501-TAXABLE/NON-TAXABLE MISC RESAL 495,868 419,185 431,704 500,000 455,000 229,451 460,000 460,000 465,000 465,000 6500-TOTAL EXPENDITURES 495,868 419,185 431,704 500,000 455,000 229,451 460,000 460,000 465,000 465,000 6735-CAPITAL OUTLAY-OTHER IMPROVEME 0 0 0 45,000 66,000 0 130,000 30,000 250,000 250,000 6701-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 0 0 0 45,000 66,000 0 130,000 30,000 250,000 250,000 6700-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 0 0 0 45,000 66,000 0 130,000 30,000 250,000 250,000 7101-TOTAL TRANSFERS 0 0 0 0 7100-TOTAL TRANSFERS 0 0 0 0 543,693 550,643 522,753 649,775 630,090 258,713 702,440 602,440 829,650 829,650 384 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 62:STREET LIGHT UTILITY-5805 (5801 Revenue,5805 Expenses) Public Works Department COMPANY 5800: STREET LIGHT UTILITY JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTION PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND REVENUE 4919 Street Light Utility Charges 566,000 607,000 607,000 668,000 668,000 735,000 735,000 Interest Revenue 1,000 2,500 - 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Total 567,000 609,500 607,000 670,000 670,000 737,000 737,000 6113 Overtime-Reg(Street Light Survey 3x Annually) 3,000 3,000 2,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 Total 3,000 3,000 2,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS Light Bollards Founders Ln-Damaged Equipment 3,860 4,000 4,000 4,200 4,200 4,300 4,300 City Owned Street Lights-Damaged Equipment 11,500 12,000 12,000 12,500 12,500 13,000 13,000 Total 15,360 16,000 16,000 16,700 16,700 17,300 17,300 6237 TELEPHONE/PAGERS Gopher State One Call Locates City-owned 3,820 3,960 3,000 4,100 4,100 4,150 4,150 Elecsys Light Monitoring Service(air time) - 1,000 - - - Total 3,820 4,960 3,000 4,100 4,100 4,150 4,150 6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES Electric Locating Service 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 Electrician-Repair Damaged City-Owned Lights 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Cedar Ave Street Light Maintenance Contract 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Repaint Ring Route Lighting 17,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 Total 51,000 52,000 52,000 52,000 52,000 52,000 52,000 6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC Electric for Traffic Signals-City+County 2,200 3,000 3,000 3,100 3,100 3,200 3,200 Total 2,200 3,000 3,000 3,100 3,100 3,200 3,200 6280 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS Cartegraph On-line Licenses 7,895 8,130 8,130 8,540 8,540 9,000 9,000 Total 7,895 8,130 8,130 8,540 8,540 9,000 9,000 6311 INSURANCE Street Lights 21,500 22,000 22,000 25,000 25,000 26,000 26,000 Total 21,500 22,000 22,000 25,000 25,000 26,000 26,000 6610 DEPRECIATION Depreciation 6,000 6,000 13,000 13,000 Total - - - 6,000 6,000 13,000 13,000 6545 NON-TAXABLE MISC FOR RESALE Street Light Electric Charges 500,000 455,000 455,000 460,000 460,000 465,000 465,000 Total 500,000 455,000 455,000 460,000 460,000 465,000 465,000 6735 CAPITAL OUTLAY-OTHER IMF Street Project-Cimarron&Surrey Trail 25,000 Street Project-133rd St. 20,000 - 45,000 Street Project-Redwood&Juniper 10,000 10,000 Street Project-Greenleaf 6th&7th 15,000 15,000 Elecsys Street Light Monitoring System 41,000 - Ring Route Boulevard Improvements 100,000 - 100,000 100,000 Street Project-Walnut Ln,Edgewood Ln,Park Ln 15,000 15,000 Street Project-142nd St.(Cedar to Galaxie) 15,000 15,000 Street Project-Greenleaf 4th 50,000 50,000 Street Project-Whitney Dr. 15,000 15,000 Street Overlay-Central Village 35,000 35,000 Street Overlay-127th St. 50,000 50,000 Total 45,000 66,000 70,000 130,000 30,000 250,000 250,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 649,775 630,090 631,130 702,440 602,440 829,650 829,650 REVENUE 567,000 609,500 607,000 670,000 670,000 737,000 737,000 385 COMPANY DEPARTMENT BUSINESS UNIT ACTIVITY 5600 60 5605 CEMETERY Public Works DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY The Cemetery Fund provides for the operation and maintenance of Lebanon Cemetery located at the intersection of Pilot Knob Road and 150th Street (County Road 42). The City of Apple Valley acquired the original 10 acre cemetery in 1998 to ensure the continued operation and general upkeep of the property. Lebanon Cemetery has space for an additional 8,000 burials based on the expansion of three acres along Embry Path. The development of the new area has allowed the main entrance to be moved off the County Road system to a safer access from the east off Embry Path. SERVICE CATEGORIES Management and operations of the Lebanon Cemetery is provided by Public Works Department staff using city-owned equipment and contractual services from private companies. The following services are provided within this division. 1. Cemetery Management and Lot Sales • Provide sales of cemetery lots and cremation niches • Assist customers with interment service arrangements • Manage interment records in accordance with State requirements and industry standards 2. Interment Services • Provide interments within columbarium structures and cremation boulders • Excavate traditional graves through contract with a private excavation contractor • Excavate cremation graves by City staff using city-owned equipment • Restore lawn turf for interment sites 3. Maintenance of Grounds • Provide turf mowing and trimming through contract with a commercial lawn maintenance company • Repair and maintain lawn sod, trees and landscaping throughout the cemetery grounds • Repair and maintain internal driveways, parking lots, boundary fence, entrance monuments, street lights, irrigation, and plow snow during the winter season 386 MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 2023 and 2024 For 2023, a maintenance shed to house equipment and materials used by staff at the cemetery is planned. Security cameras are also planned to be installed utilizing the fiber optic lines that exist in Pilot Knob adjacent to the cemetery property. In addition, the planned purchase of a mini-excavator in 2023 will allow staff to complete all burials in- house, thereby saving the contractual expense of hiring this work out and, in-turn, increasing revenues. In 2024, Microsurfacing of the Cemetery's roads and parking lots will be conducted to extend the life of the pavement. In addition, the second of the four new columbaria will be installed on the south side of the off-site burial structure. With a growing demand for cremation niches, this will be an opportune time to get this unit installed. IMPACT MEASURES / PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual Actual Actual Projected Projected Projected Item 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Lot/ Niche Sales—Resident 59 111 130 85 85 85 Lot/ Niche Sales—Non Resident 26 45 38 35 35 40 Lot/ Niche Sales Total 85 156 168 120 120 125 Number of Burials 67 67 71 75 80 85 Regular Status Personnel Schedule—FTE's Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Proposed Position Title 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 None 387 Summary Budget Department 60 Cemetery 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2023 2024 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Adopted Proposed Proposed Revenue: Sales 209,248 365,102 382,161 191,700 188,000 188,000 188,000 Other Revenues 40 140 125 2,000 100 100 100 Donations - - 318,445 - - - - Investment Earnings 17,404 13,517 (3,211) 4,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 226,692 378,759 697,520 197,700 193,100 193,100 193,100 Expenditures: Salaries&Wages 2,218 2,143 4,845 2,750 2,000 2,100 5,000 Employee Benefits 632 2,625 970 625 630 230 500 Supplies 7,478 11,530 6,212 7,669 13,330 14,650 13,650 Contractual Services 46,252 51,039 36,908 42,825 43,660 38,115 28,580 Utilities 1,502 1,863 1,567 2,977 2,800 2,860 2,945 Repairs&Maintenance - - - 1,355 1,300 1,300 1,300 Training/Travel/Dues 8,115 8,633 9,164 9,660 10,665 11,195 11,720 Other Expense 11,577 17,942 45,024 20,683 30,495 33,350 34,650 Credit Card Fees 2,854 4,235 5,723 2,900 3,500 5,000 5,000 Depreciation 37,656 76,920 82,663 40,000 90,000 90,000 97,500 Capital Outlay/Not Capitalized 4,375 4,403 3,411 70,500 225,000 145,000 135,000 Total Exp 122,657 181,334 196,488 201,944 423,380 343,800 335,845 Net Income 104,035 197,425 501,032 (4,244) (230,280) (150,700) (142,745) Change in Cash Less Capital Outlay(not above) (383,564) (146,451) (612,991) Add: Depreciation 37,656 76,920 82,663 40,000 90,000 90,000 97,500 Net Change in Cash (241,873) 127,894 (29,296) 35,756 (140,280) (60,700) (45,245) 2023 Capital Outlay: Grounds Maintenance Facility $ 60,000 Security Cameras $ 15,000 Crack Seal Road/Lot $ 5,000 Mini-Excavator $ 35,000 Master Plan Improvements $ 30,000 $ 145,000 2024 Capital Outlay: Columbaria addition (2 of 4) $ 70,000 Master Plan Improvements $ 25,000 Micro-surfacing of lot and roads $ 40,000 $ 135,000 City of Apple Valley 388 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) CEMETERY 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6110-SALARY-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 861 0 0 0 6113-OVERTIME-REGULAR EMPLOYEES 1,357 2,143 4,845 2,750 2,000 687 2,100 2,100 5,000 5,000 6105-SALARIES AND WAGES 2,218 2,143 4,845 2,750 2,000 687 2,100 2,100 5,000 5,000 6138-MEDICARE 32 30 66 40 40 10 0 0 0 0 6139-FICA 135 126 283 165 170 42 0 0 0 0 6141-PENSIONS-PERA 158 161 364 205 210 52 0 0 0 0 6142-WORKERS COMPENSATION 108 91 257 215 210 39 230 230 500 500 6144-LONG-TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE 8 0 0 6145-MEDICAL INSURANCE 184 2,210 0 0 6170-EMPLOYEE PAID PREMIUMS 15 0 0 0 6125-EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 632 2,625 970 625 630 143 230 230 500 500 6100-TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 2,849 4,769 5,815 3,375 2,630 830 2,330 2,330 5,500 5,500 6210-OFFICE SUPPLIES 0 22 29 0 6211-SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT 486 7,206 1,040 1,750 4,300 600 500 500 4,500 4,500 6212-MOTOR FUELS/OILS 300 300 300 300 6214-CHEMICALS 171 0 0 0 6215-EQUIPMENT-PARTS 50 50 200 200 6229-GENERAL SUPPLIES 6,821 4,302 5,143 5,919 9,030 1,035 13,800 13,800 8,650 8,650 6205-SUPPLIES 7,478 11,530 6,212 7,669 13,330 1,634 14,650 14,650 13,650 13,650 6205-SUPPLIES 0 0 0 0 6231-LEGAL SERVICES 0 459 0 150 150 0 150 150 150 150 6234-CITY ENGINEER CONSULTANT SERV 5,879 1,498 0 0 6235-CONSULTANT SERVICES 3,892 0 0 4,460 4,590 0 4,740 4,740 4,900 4,900 6239-PRINTING 151 0 190 215 220 0 225 225 230 230 6249-OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 36,331 49,082 36,718 38,000 38,700 13,312 33,000 33,000 23,300 23,300 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 46,252 51,039 36,908 42,825 43,660 13,312 38,115 38,115 28,580 28,580 6230-CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0 0 0 0 6255-UTILITIES-ELECTRIC 1,139 1,177 1,202 1,540 1,650 644 1,710 1,710 1,770 1,770 6257-UTILITIES-PROPANE/WATER/SEWER 363 685 365 1,437 1,150 140 1,150 1,150 1,175 1,175 6250-UTILITIES 1,502 1,863 1,567 2,977 2,800 784 2,860 2,860 2,945 2,945 6265-REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 1,355 1,300 0 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 6260-REPAIRS AND MAINTENA 0 0 0 1,355 1,300 0 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 6276-SCHOOLS/CONFERENCES/EXPOTHER 450 0 668 1,150 1,500 0 1,600 1,600 1,650 1,650 6277-MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE 0 0 0 240 260 0 240 240 240 240 6280-DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 7,665 8,633 8,497 8,270 8,905 8,557 9,355 9,355 9,830 9,830 6270-TRNG/TRAVL/DUES/UNIF 8,115 8,633 9,164 9,660 10,665 8,557 11,195 11,195 11,720 11,720 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 63,346 73,065 53,851 64,486 71,755 24,287 68,120 68,120 58,195 58,195 6200-TOTAL OPERATING COSTS 0 0 0 0 6310-RENTAL EXPENSE 385 0 0 1,200 1,300 0 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 6311-INSURANCE-PROPERTY/LIABILITY 4,400 4,600 4,770 4,770 5,000 2,083 5,500 5,500 6,000 6,000 6312-TAXES/SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 1,423 1,361 1,300 1,763 1,300 619 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 6324-CREMATION VAULTS 146 1,780 3,576 1,200 1,400 1,532 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 6325-COLUMBARIUM 4,690 6,677 7,454 5,200 5,700 3,762 5,900 5,900 6,100 6,100 6326-CREMATION BOULDER 537 3,523 27,942 6,550 15,795 6,341 16,850 16,850 17,450 17,450 6333-GENERAL-CASH DISCOUNTS -4 0 -18 -13 6351-VISA/BANK CHARGES 2,854 4,235 5,723 2,900 3,500 1,886 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES 14,431 22,177 50,747 23,583 33,995 16,209 38,350 38,350 39,650 39,650 6301-OTHER EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES 14,431 22,177 50,747 23,583 33,995 16,209 38,350 38,350 39,650 39,650 City of Apple Valley 389 Department Expense Summary Budget Years (2023-2024) CEMETERY 2021 Council 2022 Council Object 2019 Actual 2020 Actual 2021 Actual Adopted Adopted June 2022 2023 Dept 2023 Admin 2024 Dept 2024 Admin Account Original Original YTD Actual Proposed Recommend Proposed Recommend Budget Budget 6300-TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 6610-DEPRECIATION 37,656 76,920 82,663 40,000 90,000 33,971 90,000 90,000 97,500 97,500 6601-TOTAL DEPRECIATION 37,656 76,920 82,663 40,000 90,000 33,971 90,000 90,000 97,500 97,500 6600-TOTAL DEPRECIATION 37,656 76,920 82,663 40,000 90,000 33,971 90,000 90,000 97,500 97,500 6740-CAPITAL OUTLAY-MACH/EQ/OTHER 4,375 4,403 3,411 70,500 225,000 -16,074 145,000 145,000 135,000 135,000 6701-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 4,375 4,403 3,411 70,500 225,000 -16,074 145,000 145,000 135,000 135,000 6700-TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 4,375 4,403 3,411 70,500 225,000 -16,074 145,000 145,000 135,000 135,000 6810-CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS 17,884 0 0 -447 6801-TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS 17,884 0 0 -447 6800-TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS 17,884 0 0 -447 7101-TOTAL TRANSFERS 0 0 0 0 7100-TOTAL TRANSFERS 0 0 0 0 140,541 181,334 196,486 201,944 423,380 58,777 343,800 343,800 335,845 335,845 390 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 60: CEMETERY-5605 Public Works Department COMPANY 5600: CEMETERY FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND REVENUE 4610 Lot Sales 110,000 130,000 175,000 130,000 130,000 130,000 130,000 4612 Grave/Urn Digging 70,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 4613 Monument/Marker Locating 4,500 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 4614 Cremation Vaults 2,700 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 4615 Holiday/Weekend Fee 4,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 5010 Investment Interest 4,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5310 Contributions/Donations - - - - - 5399 Other Miscellaneous Revenue 2,000 100 100 100 100 100 100 Total 197,700 193,100 238,100 193,100 193,100 193,100 193,100 SALARIES 6113 Overtime-Regular 2,750 2,000 2,000 2,100 2,100 5,000 5,000 6138 Medicare 40 40 40 - - 6139 FICA 165 170 170 - - 6141 Pension-PERA 205 210 210 - - 6142 Worker's Compensation Insurance 215 210 210 230 230 500 500 Total 3,375 2,630 2,630 2,330 2,330 5,500 5,500 6211 SMALL TOOL&EQUIPMENT Hand Tools - 500 500 500 500 500 500 Metal Detector-Monument Locator 1,200 - - - - - - Ground Thawing Equipment-Replacement - 2,000 - - - 4,000 4,000 Trimmer 250 - - - - - - Backpack Blower 300 - - - - - - Water Pump - 600 600 - - - - iPads - 1,200 890 - - - - Total 1,750 4,300 1,990 500 500 4,500 4,500 6212 MOTOR FUELS/OILS Diesel Fuel 300 300 300 300 Oil/Lubricants 50 50 50 50 Total - - - 300 300 300 300 6215 EQUIPMENT-PARTS Misc 50 50 200 200 Total - - - 50 50 200 200 6229 GENERAL SUPPLIES Tree/Shrub/Annual Flower Replacement 2,127 5,190 5,190 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 Pulverized Dirt 536 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,050 1,050 Seed 592 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,050 1,050 Flags,Carpet,Wood,etc. 1,164 1,200 1,200 1,000 1,000 1,050 1,050 Hydroseed Supplies - 640 640 - - - - Concrete Sealer-Shelter Walkways - - - 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Temporary Name Plates 500 - - - - 500 500 Lot Markers 1,000 - - 1,000 1,000 - - Concrete Storage Bins - - - 4,800 4,800 - - Total 5,919 9,030 9,030 13,800 13,800 8,650 8,650 6231 LEGAL SERVICES Legal Services Fees 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 Total 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 6235 CONSULTANT SERVICES Engineering&Surveying(New area) 4,460 4,590 4,590 4,740 4,740 4,900 4,900 Total 4,460 4,590 4,590 4,740 4,740 4,900 4,900 6239 PRINTING/PUBLISHING News Ads,Brochures,Deeds,etc. 215 220 220 225 225 230 230 Total 215 220 220 225 225 230 230 6249 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES Grave Excavation 15,000 16,000 15,000 10,000 10,000 - - Lawn Service 22,000 22,700 22,700 23,000 23,000 23,300 23,300 Irrigation Service 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,050 1,050 1,100 1,100 Total 38,000 38,700 37,700 33,000 33,000 23,300 23,300 6255 UTILITIES-ELECTRIC Lighting 1,300 1,400 1,400 1,450 1,450 1,500 1,500 Irrigation 240 250 250 260 260 270 270 Total 1,540 1,650 1,650 1,710 1,710 1,770 1,770 6257 UTILITIES-OTHER LP for Thawing Ground 237 150 150 150 150 175 175 Water for Irrigation 1,200 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Total 1,437 1,150 1,150 1,150 1,150 1,175 1,175 6265 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT Fencing and Miscellaneous 410 400 400 400 400 400 400 Parking Lot Lights 945 900 900 900 900 900 900 Total 1,355 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 391 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 2023 BUDGET ACCOUNT DETAIL DEPT 60: CEMETERY-5605 Public Works Department COMPANY 5600: CEMETERY FUND JDE 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 ACC'T DESCRIPTION COUNCIL COUNCIL YEAR END DEPT ADMIN DEPT ADMIN ADOPTED ADOPTED PROJECTED PROP RECOMMEND PROP RECOMMEND 6276 SCHOOL/CONF/EXP-OTHER MAC Conference 1,150 1,500 1,500 1,600 1,600 1,650 1,650 Total 1,150 1,500 1,500 1,600 1,600 1,650 1,650 6277 MILEAGE/AUTO ALLOWANCE MAC Conference 200 215 215 200 200 200 200 Other 40 45 45 40 40 40 40 Total 240 260 260 240 240 240 240 6280 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS MN Association of Cemeteries 175 570 570 600 600 630 630 Cartegraph On-line Licenses 8,095 8,335 8,335 8,755 8,755 9,200 9,200 Total 8,270 8,905 8,905 9,355 9,355 9,830 9,830 6310 RENTAL EXPENSE Tree Sprayer,Excavator 1,200 1,300 - 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 Total 1,200 1,300 - 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 6311 INSURANCE 4,770 5,000 5,000 5,500 5,500 6,000 6,000 4,770 5,000 5,000 5,500 5,500 6,000 6,000 6312 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS Assessments on the Land Purchased 1,763 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 Total 1,763 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 6324 CREMATION VAULTS Purchase Vaults 1,200 1,400 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 Total 1,200 1,400 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 6325 COLUMBARIUM Niche Plaques 4,000 4,200 4,200 4,400 4,400 4,600 4,600 Vases 1,200 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 Total 5,200 5,700 5,700 5,900 5,900 6,100 6,100 6326 CREMATION BOULDERS Boulders 4,800 12,000 12,000 13,000 13,000 13,500 13,500 Scrolls 1,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,100 3,100 Emblems 450 475 475 500 500 500 500 Portraits 300 320 320 350 350 350 350 Total 6,550 15,795 15,795 16,850 16,850 17,450 17,450 6351 VISA/BANK CHARGES 2,900 3,500 4,500 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Total 2,900 3,500 4,500 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 6610 DEPRECIATION 40,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 97,500 97,500 Total 40,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 97,500 97,500 6740 CAPITAL OUTLAY-OTHER ITEMS Columbarium 70,000 70,000 Columbarium Footing&Landscape Design 175,000 150,000 Funeral Off-site Burial Structure Feature 30,000 Security Cameras 15,000 15,000 Micrpsurface Cemetery Lot and Roads 40,000 40,000 Crack Seal Road and Lot 5,000 5,000 Add Mini-Excavator(with Storm and Streets)-$35,000 35,000 35,000 Grounds Maintenance Building 45,000 60,000 60,000 Master Plan Improvements 15,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 25,000 25,000 Landscape Design-Shelter,Feature Area Columbarium Planter&Benches,Bench 10,500 20,000 - Total 70,500 225,000 180,000 145,000 145,000 135,000 135,000 Total Net of Personnel 198,569 420,750 373,240.00 341,470 341,470 330,345 330,345 TOTAL EXPENSES 201,944 423,380 375,870.00 343,800 343,800 335,845 335,845 LESS CAPITAL OUTLAY (70,500) (225,000) (180,000.00) (145,000) (145,000) (135,000) (135,000) Total Exp without Capital Outlay 131,444 198,380 195,870.00 198,800 198,800 200,845 200,845 12/8/2022 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Apple11 Valley 2023 Budget and Tax Levy Budget & Levy Adoption December 8, 2022 Truth in Taxation Meeting Purpose of meeting is to present proposed budget to public • Receive public comment • Adopt Budget and Levy for coming year Change since the preliminary budget Updated property values, incr. in tax rate & taxes - Drop of$34,635 in tax capacity • Tax rate rises from earlier estimated 35.230% to 35.246%, increase of$0.56 to $110.59, from $110.03 Purpose is not to address market values of individual properties Market value determination is part of County spring process County Assessors Office 651-438-4200 1 12/8/2022 --im. Agenda Budget overview Tax levy and costs drivers Valuation increases Valuation process Statements of estimated taxes Tax Impacts Tax levy and cost drivers Budget Process Begins with Annual Goal Setting, Spring of each year Staff prepares two year budget to address goals and operational needs Council discussed the budget @ informal worksession in August Preliminary Budget and Levy Adopted in early September County Send Notices of Estimated Tax Impacts - Nov. Council Adopts Budget and Levy in December 2 12/8/2022 Budget Climate • Economic outlook dims as a recession appears more likely. Interest rates continue to rise Inflation continues to impact all areas of economy, 7.7% CPI YOY—Oct `22 Households, Business as well as Local Governments MN Unemployment rate at historic low, at 2.1 State Budget currently experiencing surplus, projections improved since spring $17.6 B Surplus projected for 2024-25 biennium (State MMB Dept. Dec'22) $2.6 B Estimated budget reserve for 2022-23(MMB Budget Report—Oct 2022) Likely no change for Apple Valley in aid, potential in bonding bill ?? Overall residential property values rising: 18.1% Results in significant loss of Homestead MVE for many homeowners Overall commercial property values static w/ 1.9% overall increase New Commercial Value accounts for 0.6%, avg appreciation = 1.3% TOTAL BUDGET 3 12/8/2022 Total Budget — All Funds - Expense Total Budget -All Funds - Expenditures $88,645,140 Other Operating Items for Resale Costs �$8,291,370 9% $17,423,785 Capital Outlay & 20% Depreciation $22,455,960 25% Personal Services Debt Service $31,128,600 $1,544,875 2% 35% Transfers out & Adm. Fees $7,800,550 9% Total Budget — All Funds - Expense Total Budget -All Funds - Expenditures $88,645,140 Enterprise General Fund Funds $40,432,085 $34,013,705 38% All other Funds] Road Fund $7,068,350 8% $7,131,000 8% 4 12/8/2022 Total Budget — All Funds - Revenues Total Budget -All Funds - Revenues $85,273,986 Intergovernmental Revenue $5,369,500 7% User & Franchise_ Licenses and Fees Permits $34,318,825 41% $1,964,475 2% Other Revenues (fines, interest, Taxes etc) $1,386,741 $30,082,435 36% 2% Transfers/adm. fee $10,152,010 12% Total Budget — All Funds - Revenues Total Budget -All Funds - Revenues Intergovernmental $85,273,986 Revenue $5,369,500 7% User & Franchise Licenses and Fees Permits $34,318,825 41% $1,964,475 2% Other Revenues (fines, interest, etc) $1,386,741 Taxes 2% $30,082,435 36% Transfers/adm. fee $10,152,010 12% 5 12/8/2022 Impacts to 2023 Budget Shift to residential properties (residential valuation increase significantly greater than commercial valuation increase) New CIP bond debt service ($23 impact to Median Value Home) 2023 Election Costs Significant Worker's Compensation rate impacts New Facilities Funds Other inflationary impacts 2023 Budget — Items of Note Preliminary Levy Increases 7.42% Median Home EMV Increasing 16.74% (18.88% TMV) Tax Impact to Median Value Home up 9.45%, $110 or $9.17/mo. Loss of Homestead Market Value Exclusion (MVE) accounts for $16 of incr. Utility Rates- Typical User: Water rate up 5% $5.19/qtr or$1.73/mo Sewer rate up 5% $3.58/qtr or$1.19/mo Storm water rate up 10% $2.61/qtr or$0.87/mo Street lights up 10% $0.63/qtr or$0.21/mo Total 5.8% $12.01/qtr or$4.00/mo 6 12/8/2022 2023 Budget - Items of Note (cont'd) Pavement Management Levy Increase: $170,000, or 4.47% Transfers to Facilities Funds up $177,000 Liquor — Revenue budget increases moderating following pandemic '22 current projected sales ($11 .1M): Likely meet or exceed the '22 original budget, 12% Higher than '19 actual, 2% Higher than '20 and matches '21 '23 budgeted sales conservatively lower than current projected `22 Water/Sewer/Storm Utilities, Capital Outlay up $212k in '23 Utility Portion of Street program up $494,000 2023 Budget - Items of Note (cont'd) New Positions for 2023 — Police Officer, Police Investigative/Crime Analyst, & Asst. City Engineer (offset by revenues) Capital Outlay $16.2 M, down $2M Road fund down $1.8M) Vehicle & Equipment Replacement Fund (VERF) expenditures down $1.2M ARPA (American Rescue Plan Act) use in Budgeted Funds include: $1.5M 133rd Street, Police Community Impact Unit $143K, 41K IT security audit 7 12/8/2022 2023 Budget — Items of Note (cont'd) Street Maintenance Program @ Streets 2- plows $10.2M: Streets & Parks pickups Walnut Ln (Elm Dr — Park Ln) Streets & Park mowers & • 142nd (Cedar to Galaxie) equip. • 157th (Cedar to Galaxie) Storm Pond Improvements Hayes Rd (150th to 140t") Hayes Arena — Sound System • Intersection Improvements: AVCC — Gym Ceiling Fans • Emerald Ash Borer Response Senior Center: • Equipment: Meeting Rooms Flooring 2 Police cars Restroom Flooring 1 Fire Pickup GENERAL FUND 8 12/8/2022 2023 General Fund Expenses 2023 General Fund Expenses $40,432,085 Commodities I Other 8,741,645 22% ersonal Service 25,636,340 63% Capital Outlay 1,702,100 4% Transfers to Road Impr. Fund \_ Transfers to Mui�i'P71,000 10% Bldg Fund 381,000 1% 2023 General Fund Revenues General Fund Franchise Fees& 2023 Revenues Other Taxes 1.3% Licenses& Permits $40,432,085 4.9% Inter-governmental Rev. 3.4% Taxes 74.1% Park& Rec Chgs& Rents 3.5% Other Charges for Services & Rents 4.7% Fines& Penalties Transfers In,A in 0.7% Charges& Reserves Other Revenues 6.4% 1.0/° 9 12/8/2022 VALUATION INCREASES AND TAX IMPACTS Overall Property Values Increase 16.2% Change New Construction Appreciation Payable 2023 Property Class Payable 2022 Value Existing Properties ( Oct'22) 2022 to air 2023 Residential&Cabins $5,316,482,834 $14,128,900 $949,534,901 $6,280,146,635 18.13% C/I & Personal Prop. $630,982,700 $3,586,000 $8,254,600 $642,823,300 1.88% Utility $12,778,700 $0 $1,365,000 $14,143,700 10.68% Agricultural $1,265,800 $0 ($303,000) $962,800 -23.94% Apartments $665,633,800 $4,027,500 $92,899,100 $762,560,400 14.56% Total $6,627,143,834 $21,742,400 $1,051,750,601 $7,700,636,835 16.20% 10 12/8/2022 Overall Preliminary Tax Capacity - New Construction up 0.37% -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% Residential & Cabin 0.28% C/I & Utility 0.57% Agricultural 0.00% I Apartments 0.63% • New Construction - Pay '23 Appreciation '22 to '23 Overall Preliminary Tax Capacity - Appreciation of 15.0% -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% Residential & Cabin 18.57% C/I & Utility ' I 0.'-5% Agricultural -28.98% 1 Apartments i 13.53% MIIII •Appreciation '22 to '23 11 12/8/2022 Overall Preliminary Tax Capacity — Increases 15.37% -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 1 Residential & Cabin 0.28% 18.57% C/I & Utility 0.57% 0.p5°(0 Agricultural -28.98% 0.00% Apartments 0.63% 13.5:% • New Construction - Pay '23 •Appreciation '22 to '23 Historic Differences in Property Classes Increases Will Result in Significant Tax Shift Property Tax Shift to Other Classes Tax Impact to MV Home up 9.5% Tax Impact — MV Commercial down 5.2% A.V. Loss Of MV Homestead credit $1,004,377,728 for Pay 2023 12 12/8/2022 I r� 1 4 �j D Pay 2023 %-•�,�A •.p�!� a_ IIa'a�_;`�MI --,+ p ./ , "-77.--43gral-gap _-,,,, ,alci,,, , J.t it...J. pii,_,[0.,, 2„0„..j. -•"-��`• � - Increased Value Total vi '� �I� (��f� ,11., a�� ®U.U1 N6% Median \`\Y z � _ , ��,, �ilw r>�J-- :12.01 to 16% 7 m16.01 to 20% e7 ■�.,.I®O w'` ,y-� �20.0I to 30% ',,LL■■ 1_LLJ Value up �' �' �� l �>309b '&4,1 • 6 �4 m rip co =No in Value 16.77% 'Em_. Wir r Decreased Value - ) Ey9� -001%to-2% H �1 ti i VEN4 Ill e1 401%to-6% AMA Illi . 1 �` 6�c =-6.01%ta 8% \ _ I _ . C� -<s.o1% - ,,._,, .,mu r".--- 7 —" Al 't 11.w.e L u, � i 0. o _,... .:::::::. I Apple Percent Change Market Value 2022-2023 Valley Median Value Home Increases 16.77% to $352,800 for 2023 (Prior Peak was '08) Assessors Estimated Market Value $400,000 Median Value Homesteaded Residential $350,000 $352,800 $300,000 $302,300 $250,000 - $200,000 $197,400 $150,000 N M V O CO f•-• CO 0) 0 N N N N E O O O O O O O O O O O M N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 Tax Payable Year d 13 12/8/2022 VALUATION IS 2 YEAR PROCESS Property Valuation 2 Year Process — 2023 Taxes Based on 1 -1 -22 Values • January 1 , 2022— Property Valued by Dakota County Assessor (includes Assessor review in 2021 ) • March 2022— Property Value Notices Sent to Owners • March- June 2022 — County Assessor appeal period • June 2022— Board of Equalization Meets to Hear Valuation Objections • Nov 2022— Value Used for Preparing Parcel Specific Notices for Taxes of NEXT yr. (2023) 28 14 12/8/2022 TIMELINE FOR PROPERTY TAXES Property PAYABLE IN 2023 Value Date County Estimated Valuation 2 Jan 2,2022 Board of 2023 Tax Half *2nd Half Equalization Notice Tax Due Tax Due In June November May 15th October15th ;:ess - 2023 Taxes .es Study Based on State sales study M March- M Oct'20 -Sep'21 A May'22 Appeal A 1 -1 -22 R Period R C C Values H 2022 Tax Statements& 2023 Tax Statements& 2022 Value Notices(For Taxes 2023) 2023 Value Notices(For Taxes 2024) Property Valuation 2 Year Process — Results in a Lag in Valuations This two year process will result in a lag between the property's selling price and the Assessor assigned Estimate Market Value For Pay 2023, value estimate is as of 1 -1 -22 Property values may have gone down since 1 -1 -22, which are not reflected as of 1 -1 -22 30 15 12/8/2022 STATEMENTS OF ESTIMATED PROPERTY TAXES PAYABLE 2023 HAVE BEEN DELIVERED illillik Zille...iic .'' . u PRPERTY TAXATION SRECORDS PROPOSED TAXES 2023 ' ADAWIEaIATIDN CEIYTEt —This is Not a Bill•Do Not Pa — 1680 N ATN WAY 65 NAISTMGS.MAN ESOSA 5509oa392 e VALUES AND CLASSIFICATION ""^"°'" "h-.. Taxes Payable Year 2022 2023 Truth in Taxation Notice — r sXm.e Mrb1Va e, 332205 352,00 (P aprLy EN 21-11202- 1 .0ma rxcLNm 10012 5A P includes both TAXPAYERISk au,W.M.h50.0 0 0 292153 30.312 PmPeN ONwifiratiort A[masr0 e'sl Nsxo Estimated Market Value ri SALNTPAl1 55124- and Taxable Market Value PROPOSED TAX Ll,1.11nhl lu^4 1IIP II hndl ldrhhll6ldlnrllg„II hnp..Y Tan Mon C!d I. 170050 Sc no.Sul e,ncc�.aE 40,G.4„M Ma‘km*W cmOs Os.P.m Property Adlrem REDWOOD DR Property TA..AIM&WU: I 5700110 igi APRE VALLEY MN 55124 PROPERTY TAX STATEMENT Pr poty Dmapmn: •Coming In 2023• (m.Om.ro Arc.*Moll on IROPOSEOL£NES4 NSW) Proposed Property Taxes and Meetings by Jurisdiction for Your Property Goebel lnfonnetion Meeti,g Information Actual 2022 Proposed 2023 STATE GENERAL TAX ND PII&IC LEETNG S .00 S .00 DAKOTA COUNTY 672.1e 653,16 TNT Notice includes taxes D,53TA�UNY�MNI5 RA 10 NDV1O2022.640 nr 604650M IOSISIGNOAY55 AdAIN57MTIPCFNTER Ran *MISS TAGCU CDINSTRATIDRDGM IF�II YVA'IY dXOTACIX1N7Y115 1545 HIGHWAY 55 651a3A576 NASTINGS MN55033 w000sTr for each jurisdiction APPLE VALLEY 6 6 A4M FNNC AEEIREOTOR DEC d=PAO PM TO 1171H 6T W APPLE VALLEY MNNI:IPAL CENTER M OPALLET NEIECEMOCR1Y2N6APPIEVAMENM.DD4 APPLE 70H S SSAss2Llo APPLE mi., N SStp YE LX5T1M 3R0F MANCE ANDOPERA1DNS DEC 1220224:0P1/ 345S.1531E1 STW DMCOTA RIDGE SCHOOL R2SEMOUNTMN550E 4®LRTP STW W FXSTOTTS®gSMETME.ORO APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 651-421T713 VOTER APPROMEDIEYES SWS56 ,.54.73 y OTHER l.0011lEYEs + 16 12/8/2022 Truth in Taxation Notice — Identifies Property Classification PROPOSED TAXES 2023 14\ — ThisisNotaBill • DoNotPa — Step VALUES AND CLASSIFICATION 1 Taxes Payable Year 2022 2023 Estimated Market Value: 302200 352,800 Homestead Exclusion: 10,042 5,488 Other Excl./Deferrals: 0 0 Taxable Market Value: 292,'58 347,312 Property. Classification: I S0ii5T0 RJ:S01-677 • Truth in Taxation Notice — Includes Both Estimated Market Value & Taxable Market Value PROPOSED TAXES 2023 'IN — This is Not a Bill • Do Not Pa — Step VALUES AND CLASSIFICATION 1 Taxes Payable Year 2022 2023 Estimated Market Value: 302200 352,800 Homestead Exclusion: i0,042 5,488 Other Excl./Deferrals: 0 0 Taxable Market Value: 292.158 347,312 Property Classification: RE5aH513 I SO 1STD 17 12/8/2022 Truth in Taxation Notice — Includes Reduction in Taxable Value for the Homestead Exclusion Program Pi PROPOSED TAXES 2023 — This is Not a Bill • Do Not Pa Stoop VALUES AND CLASSIFICATION Taxes Payable Year 2022 2023 Estimated Market Value: 302200 352.&00 • Homestead Exclusion I0,042 5.488 Other Excl./Deferrals: 0 0 Taxable Market Value: 292,158 347,312 Property classification: RESOHSTD RE50HSTt] Homestead Market Value Exclusion (HMVE) Exclusion is 40% of EMV up to 76,000 Homestead Market Value Exclusion Max exclusion is 40% of 76,000 woo ▪ 30,000 Exclusion reduced 9% for value in o Zs,°°° excess of 76,000 a 20,000 HMVE phases out at $413,800 0 ls,°°° 1A • lo,000 w• s,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 00 0 N N 0 CO0 0 N N 0 00 0 N N 0 00 0 N N N M M CO Nl M N N Home's Estimated Market Value 18 12/8/2022 Proposed Property Taxes and Meetings by Jurisdiction for Your Property Contact Information Meeting Information Actual 2022 Proposed 2023 STATE GENERAL TAX NO PUBLIC MEETING $ .00 5 .00 DAKOTA COUNTY 632.86 653.46 DAKOTA COUNTY ADMINISTRATION NOV 292022-6:00 PM 1590 HIGHWAY 55 ADMINISTRATION CENTER HASTINGS MN 55033 COUNTY BOARDROOMVig WWWDAKOTACOUNTY.US 1590 HIGHWAY 55 TNTNotice 651-438-4576 HASTINGS MN 55033 04000577 APPLE VALLEY 1,163.76 1,274.34 Includes Taxes for FINANCE DEC 82022-T:OO PM APPLE AL EY M APPLE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 7100147TH STW RON.HEDBERGI CITYOFAPPLEVALLEYMN.GOV APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 Each Jurisdiction 952-953-2540 SCH GIST 196 Total Taxes for this 345 OF 153RD SCWANDOPERATIONS DEC 2022DAKTA -6:CO PM SCHOOL ROSEMOUNT MN 550E8 4629 144TH ST W Property up 8.0% 651R42370T3S@DISTRICT196.ORG APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 VOTER APPROVED LEVIES 946.98 1,054.70 OTHER LOCAL LEVIES 583.56 616.38 METRO SPECIAL TAXING DISTRICTS 58.18 60.30 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL DEC 14 2022-6:00 PM 390 ROBERT ST N METROPOLITAN COUNCIL CHAMBERS ST PAUL MN 55101-1805 390 ROBERT STN 651-602-1374 ST PAUL MN 55101-1805 OTHER SPECIAL TAXING DISTRICTS NO PUBLIC MEETING 40.66 40.82 TAX INCREMENT TAX NO PUBLIC MEETING .00 .00 FISCAL DISPARITY TAX NO PUBLIC MEETING .02 .00 TOTALS(Excluding Special Assessments) 5 3,426.00 5 3,700.00 8.0% Where Your Tax Dollars Go '23 — Breakdown of Property Taxes Paid ,fTFS �,'a".,N . D►1�D1 t 7_11 A t-K^f PO t 4.1 I W,`[1 Y V�[.'� ,v m T �, J .i1 TII I:'i' :MIT A, �'��'� 'Y�''.1JI Ell I C 1 `�, B k -0P � ; w" � wu?'y i O 3t..o.C. n p1.H l ) 5 4Iw 5 ..„' .( A.A 01 ,0 1 ) -,,,,, - 0 �g Other .027 County .177 City.344 School .452 38 19 12/8/2022 TAX IMPACTS TO MEDIAN VALUED HOME Sample Calculation (City Portion Only) Property Value 352,800 Less Homestead MV Exclusion (5,488) = Taxable Market Value 347,312 State Class Rate 1.0% = Tax Capacity 3,473 Property Tax rate 35.230% = Gross taxes paid $ 1,224 Plus Referendum Bonds 50 Property Tax Dollars Paid - City $ 1,274 20 12/8/2022 Sample House Median Valued Home Pay 2023 Market Value $ 352,800 that experienced 16.74% increase (18.88% in TMV) • Represents the Median Sample Home in Apple Valley • Levy for proposed 2023 increases by $2,214,000 or 7.42% Changes Tax Extension/Tax Capacity Rate from 38.18% to 35.23% Represents 50% of homes at this level or lower Property Taxes 2022 2023 Change City 1,116 1,224 $ 108 City Referendum 48 50 $2 Total 1,164 1,274 $ 110 % Change 9.45% Apple Valley City Taxes on Median Valued Home Compares Favorably to Similar Communities Using Median Value in each community means half of the homes (Pay 2023 Preliminary) pay more and half pay less than this in each community i Minnetonka 33.919% $468,500 Median Value Home $1,600 Eden Prairie 28.945% $513,200 Median Value Home $1,530 Burnsville 43.207% $340,900 Median Value Home $ ,445 Bloomington 38.899% $355,900 Median Value Home $1,36' Maple Grove 31.672% $425,570 Median Value Home $1,348 Lakeville 29.841% $428,600 Median Value Home $1,279 Apple Valley 35.230% $352,800 Median Value Home $1,274 Plymouth 24.900% $450,000 Median Value Home $1, 28 Blaine 32.877% $320,400 Median Value Home $1,026 5- $2so Ssoo $7so $1,000 $1,250 $1,500 $1,750 (%In bar Is Tax Capacity Extension Rate) S In bar Is the median valued home In that city 21 12/8/2022 Apple Valley City Taxes on Median Valued Home Compares Favorably to Similar Communities Using Median Value in each community means half of the homes (Pay 2023 Preliminary) pay more and half pay less than this in each community Minnetonka 33.919% $468,500 Median Value Home $1,600 Eden Prairie 28.945% $513,200 Median Value Home $1,530 Burnsville 43.207% $340,900 Median Value Home $1,445 Bloomington 38.899% $355,900 Median Value Home $1,364 Maple Grove 31.672% $425,570 Median Value Home $1,348 Lakeville 29.841% $428,600 Median Value Home $1,279 Includes Road & Apple Valley 35.230% $352,800 Median Value Home $1,274 Infrastructure Reconstruction Plymouth 24.900% $450,000 Median Value Home $1, 28 Levy Blaine 32.877% $320,400 Median Value Home $1,026 $- $250 $500 $750 $1,000 $1,250 $1,500 $1,750 (%in bar is Tax Capacity Extension Rate) $in bar is the median valued home in that city Using Median Value in each AV City Taxes on Median Valued Home Compares community means half of the homes pay more and half pay less than this Favorably to other Dakota County Cities (Pay2023-Dec) in each community Mendota Heights 39.176% $514,050 Median Value Home $2,078 West St.Paul 67.488% $284,000 Median Value Home $1,838 Inver Grove Hghts 48.781% $337,100 Median Value Home $1,611 Farmington 42.921% $349,100 Median Value Home .1,473 Burnsville 42.365% $340,800 Median Value Home 416 Hastings 53.179% $304,600 Median Value Home $1,568 South St.Paul 60.139% $269,300 Median Value Home $1,541 Lakeville 29.839% $428,600 Median Value Home $1,279 Apple Valley 35.246% $352,800 Median Value Home $1,274 Eagan 33.535% $376,100 Median Value Home $1,250 Rosemount 32.555% $384,400 Median Value Home $1,243 $- $250 $500 $750 $1,000 $1,250 $1,500 $1,750 $2,000 $2,250 (%in her is Tax Capacity Extension Rate) $in her is the median valued home in that city 22 12/8/2022 PROPERTY TAX LEVY Property Tax Levy Components Levy Component 2022 2023 Difference %Increase General Fund $24,179,439 $25,514,435 1,334,996 5.5% Street Maintenance(Levy Support) 3,801,000 3,971,000 170,000 4.5% Facilities Funds 204,000 381,000 177,000 86.8% Property Tax Delinquencies 50,000 51,700 1,700 3.4% Ice Arena Support 121,000 121,000 - 0.0% Debt Service —Voter Approved 1,074,470 1,105,455 30,985 2.9% Debt Service— all Other Levy 395,091 894,410 499,319 126.4% Total $29,825,000 $32,039,000 $2,214,000 7.4% 23 12/8/2022 Overall Levy Increase Drivers Levy increase of $2,214,000 (7.42%) Overall Levy Increase Drivers Levy increase of $2,214,000 (7.42%) Increased transfers to Road Fund & Muni Bldg $ 170,000 Increased Increased transfer to Facilities Funds $ 177,000 Capital Needs Increased other Debt Service (new CIP bonds '22 ) $ 499,000 $846,000 • Increased Voter Approved Debt Service $ 31,000 • Increase due to General Election (wages, printing, postage) $ 187,000 • COLA & Step incr. impact for (G/F) $ 539,000 • Worker's Compensation rate change $ 321,000 New Positions (levy supported) $ 98,000 Motor Fuel & Natural Gas $ 166,000 Shade Tree Program Increase (offset $138,000 grant) $ 115,000 24 12/8/2022 Apple Valley's Preliminary Total Tax Levy - Increase Favorable in Comparison to Comparable Cities (Pay 2023 Preliminary) 2023 Levy Increase 16.0% 14.5% 14.0% 12.0% 11.8% - 9.9 10.0% 9.2% - 8.0 8.0% 7.0% z1% za% za% 4.5% 5.9% 6.0 6.5% 61% 6.8 6.0% 4.9% 5.0% 5.0% 4.0% 2.0% 0.0% x. Jw.k r c�9t °� tc° J a* Qa cFAaO � J y 4� aca NaJ �o° � � \ ac " e �c ga P Source: e ce,Minnetonka Survey-Updated Dec`22 Average Increase in Certified Levies 2016 to 2022 Favorable when Compared to Other Metro Cities Blaine 9.6% Plymouth _ 7.0% Edina _ 7.0% St. Louis Park 6.4% Eagan 6.0% Woodbury 5.5% Burnsville E 5.4% Minnetonka 5.2% Lakeville 5.1% Brooklyn Park 5.0% Bloomington 4.9% Rosemount _ . 4.5% Eden Prairie . 4.1% Apple Valley 3.3% Maple Grove 2.5% 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 25 12/8/2022 Tax Rate is Lowest Since 2008 Tax Capacity Extension Rate 60.0% 49.2% 47.9% 50.0% 45.9% 44.1% 45.3% 44.7% 44.5% 1.6% 42.4% 42.5% 39.6% 39.6% 39.9% 39.6% 38.8% 38.2% 38.2% 40.00 `3�i�o 34. �•�,. %. \35.Z1 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% — 0.0% — �p'L Qp9 �pb �05 'L,0p6 'L�p1 pp4 Op9 O,yO oy1 �,'L �1� �.Lb pti5 'L Dy6 'L 'L -Tax Extension Rate Truth in Taxation Notice Calls • Five contacts received in response to notice All concerned about valuation & valuation increase One addressed loss of Homestead Market Value Exclusion Two commented "need to reduce budget during market downturns" Property Value/Class/Status questions directed to County COUNTY ASSESSORS OFFICE 651-438-4200 26 12/8/2022 State of Minnesota Property Tax Refund Programs State of MN Offers Two Programs Available for Owners of Homestead Property & Renters Based on Household Income and Property Taxes Paid on Principal Place of Residence • Homestead Credit Refund For 2022-Total Household Income Maximum of$128,280 in 2022, Maximum Refund of$3,140 Property Taxes that exceed between 1% or 2.5% of income Owned and lived in home on 1-1-23 Classified as Homesteaded Property • Special Property Tax Refund • Eligible if Net Property Tax Increased by more than 12 Percent, and Increase was at least$100. Maximum Refund of$1,000. • Renters Property tax Refund Max Renter refund $2,440 (max 2022 Household income is $69,320) More Information Available at: www.revenue.state.mn.us/property-tax-refund (or Form M1-pr Instructions) Senior Citizens' Property Tax Deferment Is Administered by the State of Minnesota Must be 65 years old Household income is $60,000 or less Must have lived in home at least 15 years Mortgage balance must be < 75% of property value Property taxes exceeding 3% of net income are deferred State pays remaining tax as a low interest loan Unpaid tax and interest becomes lien on property The lien must be paid at the time of sale • www.revenue.state.mn.us/property-tax-deferral-senior-citizens • Source:MN Statute 290B 27 12/8/2022 To Summarize Continues goal of the City Council to not Specially Assess for the annual street and infrastructure maintenance program. 2023 levy support = $3,971 ,000, avg. increase 4% since inception Addresses the City Council Adopted Goals Residential Property taxes on Median Valued Home will rise 9.5% ($111 per year, $1 ,164 to 1 ,274) Additional information available on website www.AppleValleyMN.gov Action Items Conduct Truth in Taxation meeting Adopt Resolution Adopting 2023 Budget and 2023 Property Tax Levy 28 • ITEM: 5.B. ..... :�. Apple COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 8, 2022 Valley SECTION: Regular Agenda Description: Adopt Resolution Authorizing Transfers from the Liquor Fund for 2022 Staff Contact: Department/ Division: Ron Hedberg, Finance Director Finance Department ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the resolution authorizing 2022 transfers of $680,000 from the Liquor Fund to the General Fund and $150,000 to the Valleywood Vehicle and Equipment Replacement Fund. SUMMARY: Each December the City Council approves transfers from the Liquor Fund. Since 2002, a total of $10,730,000 has been transferred to support General Fund operations. The 2022 budget included $700,000 in transfers from the liquor operations to the General Fund. The City Council adopted Valleywood Strategic Business Plan also identified an annual transfer of$150,000 to come from the Liquor Fund. BACKGROUND: For 2022, the City Council has directed that the amounts transferred to the General Fund are to support the purchase of Fire Department Ladder Truck, five Police Vehicles, 800Mhz Radios as well as supporting parks and recreation programs in the community and Valleywood operations and thereby lowering the property tax levy. The following table recaps the projects and equipment supported by the transfer from the liquor fund over the past five years. Annual Municipal Liquor Store Transfers Support the Community Amount Expenditure Supported by Annual Transfer 2018 $630,000 Fire Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus, Fire Rescue Response Truck, Three Police Vehicle, Parks & Recreation Activities 2019 $660,000 Fire Thermal Imagers, Three Police Vehicles, 800 Mhz Radios and Parks & Recreation Activities 2020 $660,000 Fire Department Hydraulic Rescue Tools, Seven Police Vehicles, 800Mhz Radios and Parks and Recreation Activities 2021 $830,000 Fire Department Ladder Truck, Six Police Vehicles, 800 Mhz Radios, Parks and Recreation Activities and Valleywood Operations 2022 $850,000 Five Police Vehicles, Fire Department Ladder Truck, 800 Mhz Radios, Park and Recreation Activities and Valleywood Operations BUDGET IMPACT: The General Fund included a $700,000 budgeted transfer from the Liquor Fund in 2022. The Valleywood Strategic Business Plan plan identified a transfer of$150,000 per year. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution Presentation CITY OF APPLE VALLEY RESOLUTION NO. 2022- RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING TRANSFERS FROM THE LIQUOR FUND FOR 2022 WHEREAS, the 2022 General Fund budget included a transfer from the Liquor Fund in the total amount of$700,000.00; and WHEREAS, the Valleywood Strategic Business Plan identified an annual transfer to Valleywood; and WHEREAS,there is sufficient money in the liquor fund to meet the fund's operating costs and to make the transfers to the General Fund and Valleywood Special Revenue Fund. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Apple Valley, Dakota County, Minnesota, that effective December 31, 2022, the amount of $700,000 shall be transferred from the Liquor Fund to the General Fund to support recreation activities and public safety capital expenditures, in addition to the transfer of$150,000 from the Liquor Fund to the Valleywood Special Revenue Fund. ADOPTED this 22nd day of December, 2022. Clint Hooppaw,Mayor ATTEST: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk 11/30/2022 Liquor Fund Transfers -2022 TRANSFERS FROM LIQUOR FUND TO GENERAL FUND TOTALS $10,920,000 SINCE 2002 $800,000 $800,000 0 0 0 $700,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 $600,000 c 0 0 0 00 00 0 00 0 $500,000 0 0' o 0 0 0 $400,000 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 $300,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 $200,000 Ig o in `h ui in $100,000 iiuuI $0 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 1 11/30/2022 Annual Municipal Liquor Store Transfers Support the Community MIII Amount Expenditures Supported by Annual Transfer 2016 $630,000 Fire Engine(Pumper),One Police Squad Car and Parks&Recreation Activities 2017 $630,000 Fire Command Van, Police Squad Car,Parks Tractor/Snowplow and Parks& Recreation Activities 201: $630,000 Fire Self Contained Breathing Apparatus,Fire Rescue Response Truck,Three Police Vehicles and Parks&Recreation Activities 201•, $660,000 Fire Thermal Imagers,Three Police Vehicles,800Mhz Radios and Parks and Recreation Activities 2020 $660,000 Seven Police Vehicles, Fire Dept. Hydraulic Tools,800Mhz Radios and Parks and Recreation Activities 2021 $830,000 Six Police Vehicles, Fire Dept. Ladder Truck, Parks&Recreation Activities and Valleywood Operations 2022 $850,000 Five Police Vehicles, Fire Dept. Ladder Truck,Parks&Recreation Activities and Valleywood Operations Action Requested Adopt Resolution Authorizing the 2022Transfers from the Liquor Fund 2 • ITEM: 5.C. ..... :�. Apple ii COUNCI L MEETING DATE: December 8, 2022 Valley SECTION: Regular Agenda Description: Adopt Resolution Approving Site Plan/Building Permit Authorization to Construct 7,920 Sq. Ft. Retail Building for Schuler Shoes on Lot 2, Block 1, LB at Orchard Place Staff Contact: Department/ Division: Alex Sharpe, Planning and Economic Dev. Spec. Community Development Department Applicant: Project Number: LB Apple Valley, LLC PC22-22-B Applicant Date: 10/19/2022 60 Days: 12/18/2022 120 Days: 2/16/2023 ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt a resolution approving site plan/building permit authorization to allow for construction of a 7,920-sq. ft. retail building for Schuler Shoes on Lot 2, Block 1, LB at Orchard Place. SUMMARY: Lunds and Byerlys has applied for site plan/building permit authorization for a 7,920-sq. ft. retail store for Schuler Shoes at 15560 English Avenue. This site was platted as part of the overall Lunds and Byerlys plat in July. The proposed use as a retail store is permitted within the "RB" (Retail Business) zone and as such the only action sought is the authorization/approval for a building permit. The Planning Commission reviewed this item on November 2, 2022, and unanimously recommended approval subject to conditions and updated landscape and site plans. The applicant has submitted revised plans which address staff and Planning Commission comments and are attached to this report. As part of the Lunds and Byerlys plat, park dedication was deferred for this lot until the time of building permit. The budget portion of this memo provides greater detail below. BACKGROUND: Comprehensive Guiding and Zoning The site is guided "C" for Commercial uses and zoned "RB" (Retail Business). A retail shoe store is a permitted use within the zone. Site Plan The primary access to the site will be through a shared access driveway on the north and south side of the site. Pedestrian access/connectivity for the entire Lunds and Byerlys (L&B) site has been studied by the City Engineer and conditions are included in their memo. The store meets the parking requirements set by code and has a cross parking agreement with the L&B site. Stormwater Stormwater for this site is being treated through a regional stormwater system that was planned for and approved as part of the L&B project. The City Engineer's memo provides additional notes and conditions related to site stormwater. Landscaping Ordinance requires that 2.5% of the means construction cost of the building be applied towards landscaping. The applicant will be required to submit a detailed cost analysis and landscape bid sheet at the time of building permit. Environmental Considerations L&B plans to be a long-term owner of the site/building. As such they are investing in the site with Energy Star mechanical units, full LED lighting, and Low E glass for thermal insulation. Additionally, staff suggested the installation of conduit and wiring to allow for several parking stalls to have electric car charging stations. The stations would not be installed with this project but would be available to do so in the future as demand for EV stations increases. BUDGET IMPACT: Park dedication was deferred to the time of development with this project and shall be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit. Commercial retail buildings generate a demand for parks within a community. Based upon the adopted fee schedule, this structure would generate the need for .037 acres of parkland within Apple Valley. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution Area Map Plan Set Memo Presentation CITY OF APPLE VALLEY RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT FOR SCHULER SHOES RETAIL BUILDING AND ATTACHING CONDITIONS THERETO WHEREAS,pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 462.357 the City of Apple Valley has adopted, as Title XV of the City Code of Ordinances, zoning regulations to control land uses throughout the City; and WHEREAS, said regulations provide that issuance of a building permit for commercial, industrial, and multiple residential uses require the specific review and approval of development plans by the Apple Valley Planning Commission and City Council; and WHEREAS, approval of such a building permit issuance has been requested for the above referenced project; and WHEREAS,the Apple Valley Planning Commission has reviewed the development plans and made a recommendation as to their approval at a public meeting held on November 2, 2022. NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Apple Valley, Dakota County,Minnesota,that the issuance of a building permit for Schuler Shoes is hereby authorized, subject to all applicable City Codes and standards, and the following conditions: 1. If the Building Permit is not paid for and issued within one(1)year of the date of approval,the approval shall lapse. 2. The Building Permit shall be applicable to property to be legally described as Lot 2, Block 1,LB at Orchard Place. 3. Construction shall occur in conformance with the site plan dated November 14, 2022, on file with the City, including parking lot paving and a non-surmountable concrete curb and gutter. 4. Construction shall occur in conformance with the landscape plan dated November 14,2022, on file with the City, (including sodded/seeded public boulevard area up to each street curbline); subject to submission of a detailed landscape planting price list for verification of the City's 2.5%landscaping requirement at the time of building permit application. 5. Construction shall occur in conformance with the utility plan dated November 14, 2022, on file with the City. 6. Construction shall occur in conformance with the elevation plan dated October 21, 2022, on file with the City. 7. Park dedication requirements are based upon the City's finding that the subdivision will create a business/occupants that will generate a need for .037 acres of parkland in accordance with adopted City standards for park services. This required dedication shall be satisfied by a cash-in-lieu of land contribution based on .037 acres of needed land area at a benchmark land value of$75,000 per acre, which the City reasonably determines that it will need to expend to acquire land elsewhere in order to provide the necessary park services as a result of this subdivision. Issuance of a building permit shall be subject to the cash-in-lieu of land contribution payment. 8. A bike rack shall be installed in close proximity to the primary entrance which does not impede pedestrian flow of the proposed sidewalks. 9. Subject to all conditions noted in the City Engineer's memo dated November 29, 2022. 10. The property owner shall execute a maintenance agreement or other suitable agreement to be filed with the deed that ensures the perpetual maintenance of all onsite stormwater areas. 11. Trash enclosures shall be screened in conformance with City Code. 12. All necessary mechanical protrusions visible to the exterior shall be screened or handled in accordance with Section 155.346 (3)(a) (b)of the City Code. 13. Issuance of a Building Permit and a final certificate of occupancy is contingent upon the project being constructed in conformance with all the preceding conditions as well as all applicable performance standards of the current zoning regulations. In the event that a certificate of occupancy is requested prior to completion of all required site improvements, a suitable financial guarantee in the amount of 125% of the estimated cost of the unfinished improvements shall be required along with an agreement authorizing the City or its agents to enter the premises and complete the required improvements if they are not completed by a reasonably stipulated deadline,with the cost of such City completion to be charged against the financial guarantee. 14. A separate application and signage plan in conformance with the sign regulations must be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the erection of any signs. 2 15. Construction and earthmoving activities shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. Weekend construction hours shall be limited to the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Construction shall not be performed on federal holidays. 16. The ongoing use and occupancy of the premises is predicated on the ongoing maintenance of the structure and all required site improvements as listed in the preceding. No alteration,removal, or change to the preceding building plans or required site improvements shall occur without the express authorization of the City. Site improvements which have deteriorated due to age or wear shall be repaired or replaced in a timely fashion. 17. Notwithstanding Chapter 153 of the Apple Valley Code of Ordinances, a permit may be issued prior to the platting of the land provided that the land must be platted prior to occupancy. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that such issuance is subject to a finding of compliance of the construction plans with the Minnesota State Building Code, as determined by the Apple Valley Building Official, and with the Minnesota State Uniform Fire Code, as determined by the Apple Valley Fire Marshal. ADOPTED this 8th day of December,2022. Clint Hooppaw,Mayor ATTEST: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk 3 R -dyr4 v.'SI r t: 1 f "•st' - JJ� r� °y ' _ �jt v..` r I! e c ' ' ' --''.-'''Z. 'iliii' l',.,.1,1-:::-• ,,,,z444.,.•.,' '.. •-•-•-.,i,f,-f.,• - •,-•,-, 0,..4. ..41Y r _ 'A ' II y �, ' •✓ a l'"t „,- "� . • r"; . ';.a, J 1 1 `EMT` 2. -.� c y ,ti. _ p ... r. , i s I u _ I I4, �.' .� F r r y SITE - j "). ••, r, r, C 01 O� tf. -Y � 1 Q o w • W W - .-r--.-. 11 - i ' , ^ - SiI imaiiia_ r , . p 111 li .. - ''''' ' ,. . d . . I I ' may. J y' Sculer Shoes N A :-.. .101,gril 15560 English Ave `;�.�j,,ei- '- ` 'r-�•��''t' ir. •••• 0 100 200 300 Feet Apple ze�'"' -z1ti�, =t Valley U C m N a) as PRELIMINARY SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS Q o _c,I FOR _ as 0 .§ ORCHARD PLACE BLOCK 1 LOT 2 RETAIL a) _. _c u) U C N a) (B O _c, SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 115N , RANGE 20W z I APPLEVALLEY, DAKOTACOUNTY, MNINOM E 0 f L'.c7) Y Z Z ui C O = Ilj 51 m Q Q 2 U 1-- 0 as O C Q O V cp = Z W >_ O Q I- LO W c, >% t z O W 2 ._ O 1- Z } ._ _ Clj W CC a) - is 11MIME — �_ Y Cl) 3 N U) PROJECT TEAM: Imo. -, co Sheet List Table W ENGINEER OWNER / DEVELOPER Sheet Number Sheet Title z Q° KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. LUND FOOD HOLDINGS, INC.as ri7, C000 COVER SHEET 0- o ° w m za > w = a o C100 GENERAL NOTES aQwou W o aao Z ILL Kimley >>> HornpZ U L&B C400 SITE PLAN o Z Q :I-m aw wwXw T_ r� C500 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN = � � � _ X a> LUNDS&BYERLYS C600 UTILITY PLAN LL = J X } � X J W J X Et PREPARED BY: WILLIAM D. MATZEK, P.E. L100 LANDSCAPE PLAN 0°o Q = Q X z � � � X -ciI IUITE100 350HST L1o1 a ST. PAU L, MN 55114 E D I NA, MN 55424 �;!�. : ' ' _ m i- W m . § TELEPHONE: (651 ) 645-4197 TELEPHONE: (952) 927-3663 V •- -sZr: ,',y- .z,- \1• ocpw Q i CONTACT: MITCH AVERY _ �� =` w o N o o 44SC' ' • Q ( N- z z o 45 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SURVEYOR Y J 0 LU E 2 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. PROBE ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC. �'' 1 - T �,ii '� co o a 0 a) PREPARED BY: MITCHELL COOKAS, PLA 1000 E. 146TH ST z a 0 2,_ 767 EUSTIS STRET, SUITE 100 BURNSVILLE, MN 55337 ST. PAUL, MN 55114 - TELEPHONE: (952) 432-3000 SITEWw ib TELEPHONE: (651 ) 645 4197 CONTACT: RUSSEL P. DAMLO, R.L.S. w � VICINITY _ . w o NORTH f I w c N .T.S . > v) 0 U 2 o °' Ce U .s a) 8 NOTES: Z .� O . 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM THAT THE EXISTING CONDITIONS FOR THE SITE MATCHco 0 Q E „ WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS INCLUDED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 0 1 Q g 2. IF REPRODUCED, THE SCALES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON A 22x34 SHEET. V U ' 3. ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR12 a, • UTILITY SERVICES COMPANIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO ANNOUNCED BUILDING H 0) (n POSSESSION AND THE FINAL CONNECTION OF SERVICES. U) z o g 4. ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES, Z E %' °' AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS. 0Ili J a) - — a) C V ,_ N W Q Ou-5 2 J � 0ZC/) u) 0. (NI LLQ � H W .1oc DCI�E Q ZJaCIW � � a o WZ � U Jm w V a III LLI , a) Know what's below. J a Call before you dig. SHEET NUMBER CC a. C000 1- d C m Io GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES EROSION CONTROL NOTES GRADING AND DRAINAGE NOTES WATER STORM SEWER & SANITARY SEWER NOTES co .5 W o 1. THE CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE MN DEPARTMENT OF 1. THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN ("SWPPP") IS COMPRISED OF THE EROSION CONTROL 1. GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL VERIFY THE SUITABILITY OF ALL EXISTING AND 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT GRAVITY SEWER LATERALS, MANHOLES, GRAVITY SEWER LINES, Q Q TRANSPORTATION "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION" (LATEST EDITION) AND BECOME PLAN, THE STANDARD DETAILS, THE PLAN NARRATIVE, ATTACHMENTS INCLUDED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS PROPOSED SITE CONDITIONS INCLUDING GRADES AND DIMENSIONS BEFORE START OF CONSTRUCTION. AND DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR 0 FAMILIAR WITH THE CONTENTS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK, AND, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL OF THE SWPPP, PLUS THE PERMIT AND ALL SUBSEQUENT REPORTS AND RELATED DOCUMENTS. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. SHALL FURNISH ALL NECESSARY MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, MACHINERY, TOOLS, MEANS OF o WORK SHALL CONFORM AS APPLICABLE TO THESE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. TRANSPORTATION AND LABOR NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE WORK IN FULL AND COMPLETE E 2. ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS INVOLVED WITH STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GRADE THE SITE TO THE ELEVATIONS INDICATED AND SHALL ADJUST BMP'S AS ACCORDANCE WITH THE SHOWN, DESCRIBED AND REASONABLY INTENDED REQUIREMENTS OF THE o = 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FURNISHING ALL MATERIAL AND LABOR TO CONSTRUCT SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN AND THE STATE OF MN NECESSARY AND REGRADE WASHOUTS WHERE THEY OCCUR AFTER EVERY RAINFALL UNTIL A GRASS CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS. IN THE EVENT THAT THE aa)i THE FACILITY AS SHOWN AND DESCRIBED IN THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM GENERAL PERMIT (NPDES PERMIT) AND BECOME STAND IS WELL ESTABLISHED OR ADEQUATE STABILIZATION OCCURS. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT, THE APPROPRIATE APPROVING AUTHORITIES, SPECIFICATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL FAMILIAR WITH THEIR CONTENTS. MOST STRINGENT SHALL GOVERN. Y CLEAR AND GRUB ALL AREAS UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, REMOVING TREES, STUMPS, ROOTS, MUCK, 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THERE IS POSITIVE DRAINAGE FROM THE PROPOSED BUILDINGS SO THAT o U) EXISTING PAVEMENT AND ALL OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIAL. 3. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP'S)AND CONTROLS SHALL CONFORM TO FEDERAL, STATE, OR LOCAL SURFACE RUNOFF WILL DRAIN BY GRAVITY TO NEW OR EXISTING DRAINAGE OUTLETS. CONTRACTOR 2. ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL z = REQUIREMENTS OR MANUAL OF PRACTICE, AS APPLICABLE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT SHALL ENSURE NO PONDING OCCURS IN PAVED AREAS AND SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IF ANY GRADING COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS FOR UTILITY LOCATION AND COORDINATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 0 m 3. THE EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS QUALITY LEVEL "D" UNLESS OTHERWISE ADDITIONAL CONTROLS AS DIRECTED BY THE PERMITTING AGENCY OR OWNER. DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND IN THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED GRADES PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF NOTES CONTAINED IN THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION SECTION OF THIS SHEET. NOTED. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF Cl/ACSE 38/02, PAVEMENT OR UTILITIES. W o ENTITLED STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF SUBSURFACE QUALITY DATA 4. SITE ENTRY AND EXIT LOCATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION THAT WILL PREVENT THE 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL DISTURBED VEGETATION IN KIND, UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE. CC .§ BY THE FHA. EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE LOCATED ACCORDING TO THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC ROADWAYS. ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED, 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL MANHOLE COVERS, VALVE COVERS, VAULT LIDS, FIRE HYDRANTS, a) THE ENGINEER AT THE TIME OF THE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY AND HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY WASHED, OR TRACKED ON A PUBLIC ROADWAY MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. WHEN WASHING IS POWER POLES, GUY WIRES, AND TELEPHONE BOXES THAT ARE TO REMAIN IN PLACE AND UNDISTURBED 4. DEFLECTION OF PIPE JOINTS AND CURVATURE OF PIPE SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MANUFACTURER'S VERIFIED BY THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER. GUARANTEE IS NOT MADE THAT ALL EXISTING REQUIRED TO REMOVE SEDIMENT PRIOR TO ENTRANCE ONTO A PUBLIC ROADWAY, IT SHALL BE DONE IN DURING CONSTRUCTION. EXISTING CASTINGS AND STRUCTURES TO REMAIN SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO SPECIFICATIONS. SECURELY CLOSE ALL OPEN ENDS OF PIPE AND FITTINGS WITH A WATERTIGHT PLUG _c UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN OR THAT THE LOCATION OF THOSE SHOWN ARE ENTIRELY AN AREA STABILIZED WITH CRUSHED STONE WHICH DRAINS INTO AN APPROVED SEDIMENT BASIN. ALL MATCH THE PROPOSED FINISHED GRADES. WHEN WORK IS NOT IN PROGRESS. THE INTERIOR OF ALL PIPES SHALL BE CLEAN AND JOINT SURFACES cn d ACCURATE. FINDING THE ACTUAL LOCATION OF ANY EXISTING UTILITIES IS THE CONTRACTOR'S FINES IMPOSED FOR DISCHARGING SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC AREAS SHALL BE PAID BY THE CONTRACTOR. WIPED CLEAN AND DRY AFTER THE PIPE HAS BEEN LOWERED INTO THE TRENCH. VALVES SHALL BE c RESPONSIBILITY AND SHALL BE DONE BEFORE COMMENCING ANY WORK IN THE VICINITY. FURTHERMORE, 5. BACKFILL FOR UTILITY LINES SHALL BE PLACED PER DETAILS, STANDARDS, AND SPECIFICATIONS SO THAT PLUMB AND LOCATED ACCORDING TO THE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES DUE TO THE 5. TEMPORARY SEEDING OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS OF STABILIZATION SHALL BE INITIATED WITHIN 7 THE UTILITY WILL BE STABLE. WHERE UTILITY LINES CROSS THE PARKING LOT, THE TOP 6 INCHES SHALL cow- m CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. DAYS OF THE LAST DISTURBANCE ON ANY AREA OF THE SITE. BE COMPACTED SIMILARLY TO THE REMAINDER OF THE LOT. UTILITY DITCHES SHALL BE VISUALLY 5. ALL PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL BE CAREFULLY STORED FOLLOWING MANUFACTURER'S o THE OWNER OR ENGINEER WILL ASSUME NO LIABILITY FOR ANY DAMAGES SUSTAINED OR COST INCURRED INSPECTED DURING THE EXCAVATION PROCESS TO ENSURE THAT UNDESIRABLE FILL IS NOT USED. RECOMMENDATIONS. CARE SHALL BE TAKEN TO AVOID DAMAGE TO THE COATING OR LINING IN ANY D.I. ° Z Q BECAUSE OF THE OPERATIONS IN THE VICINITY OF EXISTING UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES, NOR FOR 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE CLEARING TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICAL OR AS REQUIRED BY PIPE FITTINGS. ANY PIPE OR FITTING WHICH IS DAMAGED OR WHICH HAS FLAWS OR IMPERFECTIONS TEMPORARY BRACING AND SHORING OF SAME. IF IT IS NECESSARY TO SHORE, BRACE, SWING OR THE GENERAL PERMIT. 6. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF 4" OF TOPSOIL AT COMPLETION WHICH, IN THE OPINION OF THE ENGINEER OR OWNER, RENDERS IT UNFIT FOR USE, SHALL NOT BE USED. as RELOCATE A UTILITY, THE UTILITY COMPANY OR DEPARTMENT AFFECTED SHALL BE CONTACTED AND OF WORK. ALL UNPAVED AREAS IN EXISTING RIGHTS-OF-WAY DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE ANY PIPE NOT SATISFACTORY FOR USE SHALL BE CLEARLY MARKED AND IMMEDIATELY REMOVED FROM E THEIR PERMISSION OBTAINED REGARDING THE METHOD TO USE FOR SUCH WORK. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL DENOTE ON PLAN THE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA WHICH SHALL REGRADED AND SODDED. THE JOB SITE,AND SHALL BE REPLACED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. ° ALSO BE USED AS THE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AND CLEANING AREA, EMPLOYEE PARKING AREA, AND 4. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES WHICH MAY AREA FOR LOCATING PORTABLE FACILITIES, OFFICE TRAILERS, AND TOILET FACILITIES. 6. WATER FOR FIRE FIGHTING SHALL BE MADE AVAILABLE FOR USE BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO LEM v HAVE BURIED OR AERIAL UTILITIES WITHIN OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION AREA BEFORE COMMENCING 7. AFTER PLACEMENT OF SUBGRADE AND PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF PAVEMENT, CONTRACTOR SHALL TEST COMBUSTIBLES BEING BROUGHT ON SITE. Y WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE 48 HOURS MINIMUM NOTICE TO ALL UTILITY COMPANIES 8. ALL WASH WATER (CONCRETE TRUCKS, VEHICLE CLEANING, EQUIPMENT CLEANING, ETC.) SHALL BE AND OBSERVE PAVEMENT AREAS FOR EVIDENCE OF PONDING. ALL AREAS SHALL ADEQUATELY DRAIN CDz z PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. DETAINED AND PROPERLY TREATED OR DISPOSED. TOWARDS THE INTENDED STRUCTURE TO CONVEY STORM RUNOFF. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY 7. ALL UTILITY AND STORM DRAIN TRENCHES LOCATED UNDER AREAS TO RECEIVE PAVING SHALL BE - g C NOTIFY OWNER AND ENGINEER IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE DISCOVERED. COMPLETELY BACK FILLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GOVERNING JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY'S w .7 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION PERMITS AND 9. SUFFICIENT OIL AND GREASE ABSORBING MATERIALS AND FLOTATION BOOMS SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON SPECIFICATIONS. IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY Q Q 2 Q BONDS IF REQUIRED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. SITE OR READILY AVAILABLE TO CONTAIN AND CLEAN-UP FUEL OR CHEMICAL SPILLS AND LEAKS. 8. WHERE EXISTING PAVEMENT IS INDICATED TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT, THE MOST STRINGENT SHALL GOVERN. U Cl- N. 0 D SAW CUT FULL DEPTH FOR A SMOOTH AND STRAIGHT JOINT AND REPLACE THE PAVEMENT WITH THE SAME O) u) v Z o 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE AVAILABLE AT THE JOB SITE AT ALL TIMES ONE COPY OF THE 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DUST CONTROL ON SITE. THE USE OF MOTOR OILS AND TYPE AND DEPTH OF MATERIAL AS EXISTING OR AS INDICATED. 8. UNDERGROUND LINES SHALL BE SURVEYED BY A STATE OF MN PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR PRIOR ^ Q o L4 o m CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS INCLUDING PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, GEOTECHNICAL REPORT AND SPECIAL OTHER PETROLEUM BASED OR TOXIC LIQUIDS FOR DUST SUPPRESSION OPERATIONS IS PROHIBITED. TO BACK FILLING. a o O o CONDITIONS AND COPIES OF ANY REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION PERMITS. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL PROTECTION OVER ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES FOR THE DURATION OF Q LLJ N- w ca 11. RUBBISH, TRASH, GARBAGE, LITTER, OR OTHER SUCH MATERIALS SHALL BE DEPOSITED INTO SEALED CONSTRUCTION AND UNTIL ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROJECT BY THE OWNER. ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM, AT HIS OWN EXPENSE, ANY AND ALL TESTS REQUIRED BY THE >1.._ J Lijcc.• 7. ANY DISCREPANCIES ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE CONTAINERS. MATERIALS SHALL BE PREVENTED FROM LEAVING THE PREMISES THROUGH THE ACTION OF SHALL BE CLEANED OF DEBRIS AS REQUIRED DURING AND AT THE END OF CONSTRUCTION TO PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS AND/OR ANY AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION. THESE TESTS MAY INCLUDE, BUT MAY NOT 0 H Z 2 Y OWNER AND ENGINEER BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. NO FIELD CHANGES OR DEVIATIONS FROM DESIGN WIND OR STORM WATER DISCHARGE INTO DRAINAGE DITCHES OR WATERS OF THE STATE. POSITIVE DRAINAGE FLOWS. BE LIMITED TO, INFILTRATION AND EXFILTRATION, TELEVISION INSPECTION AND A MANDREL TEST ON CI) ' w ii § as ARE TO BE MADE WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE OWNER AND NOTIFICATION TO THE ENGINEER. GRAVITY SEWER. A COPY OF THE TEST RESULTS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE UTILITY PROVIDER, OWNER Li] c 12. ALL STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION MEASURES PRESENTED ON THE PLAN SHALL BE INITIATED AS 10. IF DEWATERING IS REQUIRED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ANY APPLICABLE REQUIRED PERMITS. AND JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY AS REQUIRED. 2 u) -c 8. ALL COPIES OF COMPACTION, CONCRETE AND OTHER REQUIRED TEST RESULTS ARE TO BE SENT TO THE SOON AS IS PRACTICABLE. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO COORDINATE WITH THE OWNER AND THE DESIGN ENGINEER PRIOR TO ANY Y OWNER DIRECTLY FROM THE TESTING AGENCY. EXCAVATION. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE FOR A MINIMUM HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE OF 10' AND A VERTICAL N 1 0 0 13. ALL STAGING AREAS, STOCKPILES, SPOILS, ETC. SHALL BE LOCATED SUCH THAT THEY WILL NOT CLEARANCE OF 18" BETWEEN WATER AND SANITARY SEWER MANHOLES AND LINES. CV 13. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DOCUMENTING AND MAINTAINING AS-BUILT INFORMATION ADVERSELY AFFECT STORM WATER QUALITY. OTHERWISE, COVERING OR ENCIRCLING THESE AREAS WITH 11. FIELD DENSITY TESTS SHALL BE TAKEN AT INTERVALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL coo WHICH SHALL BE RECORDED AS CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES OR AT THE COMPLETION OF APPROPRIATE SOME PROTECTIVE MEASURE WILL BE NECESSARY. AGENCY OR TO MN/DOT STANDARDS. IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THE 11. IF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES TO REMAIN ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION IT SHALL BE THE N- c) CONSTRUCTION INTERVALS AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AS-BUILT DRAWINGS TO THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT, THE MOST STRINGENT SHALL CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO REPAIR AND/OR REPLACE THE EXISTING STRUCTURE AS NECESSARY OWNER FOR THE PURPOSE OF CERTIFICATION TO JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES AS REQUIRED. ALL AS-BUILT 14. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RE-ESTABLISHING ANY EROSION CONTROL DEVICE WHICH GOVERN. TO RETURN IT TO EXISTING CONDITIONS OR BETTER. c o DATA SHALL BE COLLECTED BY A STATE OF MN PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR WHOSE SERVICES ARE THEY DISTURB. EACH CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE OF ANY DEFICIENCIES -o ENGAGED BY THE CONTRACTOR. IN THE ESTABLISHED EROSION CONTROL MEASURES THAT MAY LEAD TO UNAUTHORIZED DISCHARGE OR 12. ALL SLOPES AND AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE GRADED AS PER PLANS. THE AREAS 12. ALL STORM PIPE ENTERING STRUCTURES SHALL BE GROUTED TO ASSURE CONNECTION AT STRUCTURE IS 15 STORM WATER POLLUTION, SEDIMENTATION, OR OTHER POLLUTANTS. UNAUTHORIZED POLLUTANTS SHALL THEN BE SODDED OR SEEDED AS SPECIFIED IN THE PLANS, FERTILIZED, MULCHED, WATERED AND WATERTIGHT UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED BY CITY AND STATE DESIGN STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. O 10. ANY WELLS DISCOVERED ON SITE THAT WILL HAVE NO USE MUST BE PLUGGED BY A LICENSED WELL INCLUDE (BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO) EXCESS CONCRETE DUMPING OR CONCRETE RESIDUE, PAINTS, MAINTAINED UNTIL HARDY GRASS GROWTH IS ESTABLISHED IN ALL AREAS. ANY AREAS DISTURBED FOR } LL a, DRILLING CONTRACTOR IN A MANNER APPROVED BY ALL JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL SOLVENTS, GREASES, FUEL AND LUBRICANT OIL, PESTICIDES, AND ANY SOLID WASTE MATERIALS. ANY REASON PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE JOB SHALL BE CORRECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT 13. UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED IN CITY AND STATE DESIGN STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS, ALL STORM o ❑ J 0 c BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ANY WELL ABANDONMENT PERMITS REQUIRED. NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. ALL EARTHEN AREAS WILL BE SODDED OR SEEDED AND MULCHED SEWER MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE FLUSH WITH PAVEMENT, AND SHALL HAVE TRAFFIC cc ¢ z `° 15. EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE START OF AS SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPING PLAN. BEARING RING & COVERS. MANHOLES IN UNPAVED AREAS SHALL BE 6" ABOVE FINISH GRADE. LIDS SHALL Q z 0 a • 11. ANY WELL DISCOVERED DURING EARTH MOVING OR EXCAVATION SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE LAND-DISTURBING ACTIVITIES ON THE PROJECT. BE LABELED "STORM SEWER". EXISTING CASTINGS AND STRUCTURES WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS SHALL BE cc o w F W a APPROPRIATE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER DISCOVERY IS MADE. 13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONTROL OF DUST AND DIRT RISING AND ADJUSTED TO MEET THESE CONDITIONS AND THE PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE. Q a cc " 2 16. ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ARE TO BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLANS AND SCATTERING IN THE AIR DURING CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL PROVIDE WATER SPRINKLING OR OTHER a a a a 0 w Z E 12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THAT THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN SPECIFICATIONS FOR THIS PROJECT. CHANGES ARE TO BE APPROVED BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BY THE SUITABLE METHODS OF CONTROL. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL GOVERNING 14. TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION IS TAKEN FROM A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY LAND SURVEYORS. IF THE _ S w Q -21 -a ON THE PLANS DO NOT CONFLICT WITH ANY KNOWN EXISTING OR OTHER PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. IF DESIGN ENGINEER AND THE CITY OF APPLE VALLEY ENGINEERING DIVISION. REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION. CONTRACTOR DOES NOT ACCEPT EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, WITHOUT H 0 I- z ca ANY CONFLICTS ARE DISCOVERED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION EXCEPTION, THEN THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY, AT THEIR EXPENSE, A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY A = �_ _ • x ° OF ANY PORTION OF THE SITE WORK THAT WOULD BE AFFECTED. FAILURE TO NOTIFY OWNER OF AN 17. IF THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN AS APPROVED CANNOT CONTROL EROSION AND OFF-SITE 14. SOD, WHERE CALLED FOR, MUST BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED ON EXPOSED SLOPES WITHIN 48 HOURS REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR TO THE OWNER FOR REVIEW. } } J H x u) IDENTIFIABLE CONFLICT PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH INSTALLATION RELIEVES OWNER OF ANY SEDIMENTATION FROM THE PROJECT, THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN WILL HAVE TO BE REVISED AND/OR OF COMPLETING FINAL GRADING, AND AT ANY OTHER TIME AS NECESSARY, TO PREVENT EROSION, _ _1 w _,• x OBLIGATION TO PAY FOR A RELATED CHANGE ORDER. ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES WILL BE REQUIRED ON SITE. ANY REVISIONS TO THE EROSION SEDIMENTATION OR TURBID DISCHARGES. 15. CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE GOVERNING CODES AND BE CONSTRUCTED TO w Q w ¢ ? Q x Q CONTROL PLAN MADE BY THE CONTRACTOR MUST BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. SAME. } < Q cc o x 2 13. SHOULD CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTER ANY DEBRIS LADEN SOIL, STRUCTURES NOT IDENTIFIED IN THE 15. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT LANDSCAPE ISLAND PLANTING AREAS AND OTHER PLANTING w '� D - z w (.0 a°ai DOCUMENTS, OR OTHER SOURCE OF POTENTIAL CONTAMINATION, THEY SHALL IMMEDIATELY CONTACT AREAS ARE NOT COMPACTED AND DO NOT CONTAIN ROAD BASE MATERIALS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL 16. ALL STORM STRUCTURES SHALL HAVE A SMOOTH UNIFORM POURED MORTAR FROM INVERT IN TO INVERT = a wo = - z Q THE ENGINEER AND OWNER. ALSO EXCAVATE AND REMOVE ALL UNDESIRABLE MATERIAL FROM ALL AREAS ON THE SITE TO BE PLANTED OUT. - w I- w - 0 1 0- N AND PROPERLY DISPOSED OF IN A LEGAL MANNER. z -1 m NN 14. NO CONSTRUCTION WORK SHALL BEGIN PRIOR TO A PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING CONFERENCE WITH A 17. ROOF DRAINS SHALL BE CONNECTED TO STORM SEWER BY PREFABRICATED WYES OR AT STORMcp Q a NI _, PUBLIC WORKS AND BUILDING INSPECTIONS REPRESENTATIVE. 16. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL UNDERGROUND STORM WATER PIPING PER MANUFACTURER'S STRUCTURES. ROOF DRAINS AND TRUCK WELL DRAIN SHALL RUN AT A MINIMUM 1% SLOPE, UNLESS U N o RECOMMENDATIONS AND MN/DOT SPECIFICATION. NOTED OTHERWISE,AND TIE IN AT THE CENTERLINE OF THE STORM MAIN. Lu o w o 1 15. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (952-953-2400) SHALL BE NOTIFIED A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS FOR ANY Q Q m } o REQUIRED WATER MAIN SHUT DOWNS AND/OR CONNECTIONS. 17. ALL CONCRETE/ASPHALT SHALL BE INSTALLED PER GEOTECH REPORT, CITY OF APPLE VALLEY AND 18. ALL ROOF AND SANITARY SEWER DRAINS SHALL BE INSULATED IF 6' OF COVER CANNOT BE PROVIDED. 0_ 0 0 7 ❑ } 00 CDMN/DOT SPECIFICATIONS. Q cfl w m o _0C = � LLI Z Z E •2 16. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY WATER DEPARTMENT SHALL OPERATE ALL VALVES ON PUBLIC OWNED MAINS AND 19. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND APPURTENANCES THAT ARE Y Q Q w -0 VALVES CONNECTION PRIVATE LINES TO PUBLIC OWNED MAINS. 18. SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE TO FLOWLINE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. TO REMAIN FROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. 0 o o 2 O C Z o PAVING AND STRIPING NOTES 19. LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION ARE TO THE PROPERTY LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED ON THE PLAN. 20. THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES, STORM DRAINAGE STRUCTURES AND OTHER ABOVE AND a BELOW-GRADE IMPROVEMENTS ARE APPROXIMATE AS SHOWN. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY -0 a 20. IMMEDIATELY REPORT TO THE OWNER ANY DISCREPANCIES FOUND BETWEEN ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS TO DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION, SIZE AND INVERT ELEVATIONS OF EACH PRIOR TO THE START OF of o 1. ALL PAVING, CONSTRUCTION, MATERIALS, AND WORKMANSHIP WITHIN JURISDICTION'S RIGHT-OF-WAY AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. CONSTRUCTION. INU LLJ F BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH I- a Z � EROSION CONTROL MAINTENANCE ORALL MNDOT SPECIFICATIONS AND LCAL SO ANDAR SORO(COUNTY ANDSPIIOF NS NOT COVEREDAS BYDLOCALEST OR COUNTY N) 21. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING AND PROTECTING EXISTING UTILITIES, AND SHALL 21. A MINIMUM OF 5' SEPARATION IS REQUIRED BETWEEN UTILITIES AND TREES UNLESS A ROOT BARRIER IS O REGULATIONS. REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO EXISTING UTILITIES THAT OCCUR DURING CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT UTILIZED. O _1 - ALL MEASURES STATED ON THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN, AND IN THE STORM WATER COMPENSATION. Q ° POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN, SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN FULLY FUNCTIONAL CONDITION AS REQUIRED BY ALL 2. ALL SIGNS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, AND OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO MANUAL 22. GAS, PHONE AND ELECTRIC SERVICES SHOWN FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. DRY UTILITY W c JURISDICTIONS UNTIL NO LONGER REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETED PHASE OF WORK OR FINAL STABILIZATION OF ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (M.U.T.C.D)AND CITY STANDARDS. 22. BLEND NEW EARTHWORK SMOOTHLY TO TRANSITION BACK TO EXISTING GRADE. COMPANIES MAY ALTER THE DESIGN LAYOUT DURING THEIR REVIEW. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE Z ° THE SITE. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE CHECKED BY A CERTIFIED FINAL DESIGN AND INSTALLATION WITH UTILITY COMPANIES. W a�i PERSON AT LEAST ONCE EVERY 7 CALENDAR DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS OF THE END OF A 0.5" RAINFALL 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS FOR FIRE LANES, ROADWAY LANES, PARKING 23. ALL PROPOSED GRADES ONSITE SHALL BE 3:1 OR FLATTER UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON THE PLANS. C'? EVENT, AND CLEANED AND REPAIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING: STALLS, ACCESSIBLE PARKING SYMBOLS, ACCESS AISLES, STOP BARS AND SIGNS, AND MISCELLANEOUS ANY SLOPES STEEPER THAN 4:1 REQUIRE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BLANKET. 23. COORDINATE UTILITY INSTALLATION WITH IRRIGATION DESIGN AND INSTALLATION. 14 STRIPING WITHIN THE PARKING LOT AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. .( INLET PROTECTION DEVICES AND BARRIERS SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED IF THEY SHOW SIGNS OF 24. ADHERE TO ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS NECESSARY IN THE GENERAL N.P.D.E.S. PERMIT AND 24. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FLOW LINE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PERIMETER WALL DIMENSIONSCe N ai UNDERMINING, OR DETERIORATION. 4. ALL EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL EXTEND THROUGH THE CURB. STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGE ASSOCIATED WITH ARE TO INSIDE WALL FACE. REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT WALL WIDTH AND Z .L CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. SPECIFICATIONS. O W U-) a)) 1. ALL SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE CHECKED REGULARLY TO SEE THAT A GOOD STAND IS MAINTAINED. AREAS 5. THE MINIMUM LENGTH OF OFFSET JOINTS AT RADIUS POINTS SHALL BE 2 FEET. Z C o SHOULD BE FERTILIZED, WATERED AND RESEEDED AS NEEDED. FOR MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS 25. ADJUST AND/OR CUT EXISTING PAVEMENT AS NECESSARY TO ASSURE A SMOOTH FIT AND CONTINUOUS 25. REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS (BY OTHERS). FOR EXACT BUILDING DIMENSIONS, AND MATERIALS EL c REFER TO THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 6. ALL JOINTS, INCLUDING EXPANSION JOINTS WITH REMOVABLE TACK STRIPS, SHALL BE SEALED WITH JOINT GRADE. SPECIFICATIONS. r , 6 E SEALANT. V INU 2. SILT FENCES SHALL BE REPAIRED TO THEIR ORIGINAL CONDITIONS IF DAMAGED. SEDIMENT SHALL BE 26. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE MINIMUM GRADES ARE MET WITHIN PAVED AREAS, 1.2% FOR ASPHALT 26. REFERENCE M.E.P. PLANS (BY OTHERS) FOR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT DIMENSIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS. D U c REMOVED FROM THE SILT FENCES WHEN IT REACHES ONE-THIRD THE HEIGHT OF THE SILT FENCE. 7. THE MATERIALS AND PROPERTIES OF ALL CONCRETE SHALL MEET THE APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS IN PAVING AND 0.6% FOR CONCRETE PAVING. �/ THE A.C.I. (AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE) MANUAL OF CONCRETE PRACTICE. 27. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE STRUCTURAL PLANS (BY OTHERS) FOR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT H as 3. THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE(S) SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT DIMENSIONS AND PAD PREPARATION SPECIFICATIONS. r^ N c� TRACKING OR FLOW OF MUD ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY A SECOND COATING OVER ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE VJ Z O .(T) OF THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES AS CONDITIONS DEMAND. BY OWNER FOLLOWED BY A COAT OF GLASS BEADS AS APPLICABLE PER THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS. 28. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE M.E.P PLANS (BY OTHERS) FOR LIGHT POLE WIRING. Z 2 co - O a) -0 4. THE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA SHALL BE KEPT IN GOOD CONDITION (SUITABLE FOR 9. ANY EXISTING PAVEMENT, CURBS AND/OR SIDEWALKS DAMAGED OR REMOVED WILL BE REPAIRED BY THE O5° PARKING AND STORAGE). THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING OF THE TEMPORARY PARKING AS CONTRACTOR AT HIS EXPENSE TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER AND OWNER. 0 W H CONDITIONS DEMAND. (n a 10. BEFORE PLACING PAVEMENT, CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY SUITABLE ACCESSIBLE ROUTES (PER A.D.A). W a 5. ALL MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS SHALL BE DONE IN A TIMELY MANNER BUT IN NO CASE LATER THAN 2 GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSING DRIVEWAYS SHALL 0 < r/ Q _c cm CALENDAR DAYS FOLLOWING THE INSPECTION. CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES J O Z c� .7 EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL. IN NO CASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2% . IN NO a (y 0 - ° CASE SHALL LONGITUDINAL SIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING o . STALLS OR AISLES EXCEED 2% (1.5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL 3RD PARTY TEST REPORTS REQ'D 0 0 ~ W co OJC - BUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER re 0 ce IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TO PAVING. NO CONTRACTOR z J Q 13 W 12 ° TEST REPORTS REQUIRED FOR CLOSE OUT INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO: Q d ` CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A.D.A COMPLIANCE ISSUES. W Z T v 2 TYPICAL OWN ER/ENGINEER OBSERVATIONS 11. MAXIMUM JOINT SPACING IS TWICE THE DEPTH OF THE CONCRETE PAVEMENT IN FEET. - DENSITY TEST REPORTS _ a CO- BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTS OF WATER SYSTEM n/ U i .1 W - PRESSURE TEST OF WATER/SEWER LL r/ U > ° CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY OWNER AND/OR ENGINEER 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE LEAK TESTS ON SEWER SYSTEM AND GREASE TRAPS Z 0 0 ; -ANY OTHER TESTING REQUIRED BY THE AGENCY/MUNICIPALITY I Q FOLLOWING ACTIVITIES: MJ W W - PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING, SUBGRADE PREPARATION, BASE INSTALLATION S W d O 5 ASPHALT INSTALLATION, UNDERGROUND PIPING AND UTILITIES INSTALLATION, -Id JI E INSTALLATION OF STRUCTURES, CHECK VALVES, HYDRANTS, METERS, ETC., SIDEWALK w Q 0 o INSTALLATION, CONNECTIONS TO WATER AND SEWER MAINS, TESTS OF UTILITIES SHEET NUMBER LL 0_ C100 H U p PROPERTY SUMMARY LEGEND o I I I I - - PROPERTY LINE W I- I I I ORCHARD PLACE - SCHULER SHOES Q a I I SETBACK LINE 0 c co TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 58,724 SF (1.35 AC) I PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER L I 1 t t ZONING SUMMARY b PROPOSED STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT E , `U) EXISTING ZONING RB - RETAIL BUSINESS Y - o I:III I (/) PROPOSED ZONING RB - RETAIL BUSINESS z E co I I I o I I ct — i ; Alk /// co I I / c /7-- -- I it l \ „�. I 1 I — as o I \ N I 4 IINN \, a I III / - - - - - �I I (( h I / \\ • ❑ ❑ ❑ I I I I I I I °I a I I /I /� z U) •(:Cr) 4 4 1 )151\\ k 1 0 A \s El 0 0 . _ _ \ ,.. 1 , II '_ - _ - L T I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ BUILDING DATA SUMMARY CD Z Z_ _ _ -as _ SITE PLAN NOTES `� AREAS a Q _ _ _ ca 5'PARKING SETBACK R11.00' 1. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CITY/COUNTY REGULATIONS 0 H rn O as — _ I BUILDING AREA 8,050 SF AND CODES AND O.S.H.A.STANDARDS. c -cs \ .y .y .y W W W W W .y .y W W O I \ a o L4 O Co I R11.00' — — — — 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT ^ 0 I I c /% PERCENT OF TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 13.71% LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULES,SLOPE PAVING,SIDEWALKS, EXIT z Li ir> w Iw w w w w w w w 15'BUILDING SETBACK W `� 0 � PORCHES,TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING zz R w m o ©� /�L ° I II :7° UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS. O - Z Y B H r © — — — —��/ PARKING = w ° \ 1�__— 3. ALL INNER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE 3'AND OUTER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE 10' w a co a I UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.STRIPED RADII ARE TO BE 5'. - I- 0 J \\\ \ r REQUIRED PARKING 54 SPACES @ 6.67/1,000 SF — 2 cn •- W W W W W W W W ° I I 4. ALL DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE N 3 I 5.00' 13R4.00' R4.00' 19 .v NOTED. o 0 I a •I I PROPOSED PARKING 40 STALLS* N w w '5.00'' I 4, OM ° W 5. EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE TO BE ABANDONED, © co 3 I W I I REMOVED OR RELOCATED AS NECESSARY.ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE ' i - 18.50' 25.00' 18.50' W ADA STALLS REQUIRED/ PROVIDED 2 STALLS/2 STALLS BID. E 4 o OA o o I I 1 I I 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELOCATIONS,(UNLESS o W4, *CROSS PARKING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THIS PROPERTY AND NEIGHBORING LUNDS& OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS)INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO,ALL UTILITIES, c I BYERLYS STORM DRAINAGE,SIGNS,TRAFFIC SIGNALS&POLES, ETC.AS REQUIRED. ALL W WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES REQUIREMENTS o I (H1 Si, II AND PROJECT SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY SUCH.ALL } Il U I v n `� , a W COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID. o z Q O b • W j Q �JJ 11 7. KIMLEY-HORN ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS, INACCURACIES,OR a z 0 F v �J 4, I I OMISSIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. W 0 co CT) w 'a w 0 I zajlwi - a fl- 8. PYLON/MONUMENT SIGNS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED BY OTHERS.SIGNS ARE cn O lL Y d 2 yj © � Q B I SHOWN FOR GRAPHICAL&INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY.CONTRACTOR TO u s_ a 0 N z _ /�✓� ° I VERIFY SIZE, LOCATION AND ANY REQUIRED PERMITS NECESSARY FOR THE _ cn w Q a I D CONSTRUCTION OF THE PYLON/MONUMENT SIGN. O O z O RETAIL �' a W w u1 1u x Co I A PROPERTY LINEV _ ct U z 2 x o ±7,920 SF 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH/MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING AND ' 3 ma) - W W I I ELECTRICAL PLAN. LL O} _ x J W J x £ O,YOZ X II 4,4, 10. NO PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SUCH AS TREES OR SHRUBS,ABOVE AND W o a d x -a 1 y 0 4, —t I UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES,OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED 0a ° Qw Ox 2 4, WITHIN EXISTING OR PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY UNLESS z v ce F z Zw0- — 1 -1 SPECIFICALLY NOTED ON PLANS OTHERWISE. w w O <O ' PROPERTY LINE I • r 1 si, )=1 sir y x r w o E a I 5'PARKING SETBACK I I 11. REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAILS. z U m g Lo I ' I 12. REFER TO FINAL PLAT OR ALTA SURVEY FOR EXACT LOT AND PROPERTY I- 0 Q > U 0 (NI 4 t BOUNDARY DIMENSIONS. w o N 1 `I' 1 I p LLJ p (n N ' 13. ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT. W M < a m m p _o i - a o o ; a m 0 N 1 14. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT. _ w z Y I ' 6 U W O 4, r0 [ 15. ALL PARKING STALLS TO BE 9'IN WIDTH AND 18'IN LENGTH UNLESS OTHERWISE Y U w _ 5'PARKING SETBACK I A ii W INDICATED. Co I O Jo a I W I I E 2- TRANSFORMER PAD I W 4, V 1 5.00' 4,Z J � [-IC)° B GY W . 4, 4, 4, W W 0 0, 4/CD 2U O 4, Wy 15'BUILDING SETBACK II • Z a) WI , I 4,J I .I KEYNOTE LEGEND ao I W 4,WW Io I OU o CONCRETE SIDEWALK elm I- 11 ICN U W OMATCH EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT/CURB&GUTTER I W 4, W\��R4.00' © • Y I R4.00' 111 IT . 9.00 O ACCESSIBLE PARKING °6 yyyy W•2 I OACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGNa) yy o 4, 4, 8 I C4- 4, L. 4, 4, o0 4, 0AREA STRIPED WITH 4"SYSL @ 45°2'O.C. J co o 4, 4, W U 0 W 4, 4, 25.00'4, lr W 4, W I I OF STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT Q � 4, — I -o IIIm 4, D w I OG LANDSCAPE AREA s I y 'I 4, L _ —_—_ II p DRAINAGE&UTILITY EASEMENT y y y y =1\ — — — _ II /1� OH 6612 CURB&GUTTRE(TYP.)I H W 4Y W 4Y W W 4Y 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, W W y ©4, 4, I 1\ (!) w w w w G 1 1 1 w w w sk 6.41' .v K — �i \� --- z �� + OI FLAT CURB 7 E °� O � _ - - - L W A %� O °� \ \ W y W W W W W I JO DIRECTIONAL TRAFFIC SIGN (PER LOCAL CODES) O _c c I I OK ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP Ill Q (n S R16.00' R16.00' L I 0 I ♦ OL STOP SIGN Li a) aII oa � co J cn U , I ♦ OM BIKE PARKING N Q Z 15'BUILDING SETBACK A 4( U I li Co� I I ==11 - - - ooCe. ..... o � v) oc �,ET 1 �I II z J a CI W ct, cs I L__ k _ , la l a a I NORTH V J m w Q �j ° 15'BUILDING SETBACK Ai . A °��I��1 ° 4 G fi° A �� 4ME� G I1� _ 811 LL J _ _ l�l� - - - - II - - - - - - � II. - - - - - - z O O > Q 5'PARKING SETBACK" ° — J W > ° CO a Ui :-' a GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET ° a iiiiiiii 0 1iii0 20 40 J a �I E 4 I a a Know what's below. LLJ a ° a I ° SHEET NUMBER co I �/ aii. CaII before you dig. CC I- / C400 U c CO N co I I I 1 \ I I LEGEND \ \ i o �I Q I ,I - - PROPERTY LINE 0 co c 1 \ I I I EXISTING CONTOUR E I1 1 At t 925 PROPOSED CONTOUR IT I \ PROPOSED RIDGE LINE I < < < < < PROPOSED SWALE 1I \ l�l 0 PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE(SOLID CASTING) o 1 \ I \ • PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE(ROUND INLET CASTING) Zll K O c� \ \ PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/CATCH BASIN(CURB INLET CASTING) C o I \ I \ ri1ii1 PROPOSED STORM SEWER CLENOUT Ij- PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION 1 Et I 1 I IF Alk \ PROPOSED RIPRAP _ i / /� �. PROPOSED STORM SEWER \ /� _ _ \ PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION .__\4 d L �\ /, (100.00}fix c - - �\ Itl ( , PROPOSED HIGH POINT ELEVATION i� I a a I Il II // - PROPOSED LOW POINT ELEVATION o I \\ a• �1 \ U �f ® �)�/ �/ I I I I I I 1 (LP:0.0} PROPOSED GUTTER ELEVATION Zci cn .Cr) \. �\\�\` `\`\�\`,111 I r a °° // % I (G:0.00}fix / (T:0.00} PROPOSED TOP OF CURB ELEVATIONC Nh, \\\ El CI3E S +,,, _.____1.4 � / \ \� \ -// `� / \\\` \ ' (T/G:O.0)-xPROPOSED FLUSH PAVEMENT ELEVATION Io � ' �� MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION \ \ , PROPOSED EMERGENCY OVERFLOW ELEVATION I \ \ (EOF:0.0}- - Y Ln - - - \ \ TWTW 0 00�x PROPOSED TOP/BOTTOM OF WALL ELEVATION CD z z c / cti 0 n [(ME:944.54) \ r w JIP 0.0% PROPOSED DRAINAGE DIRECTION ~_ Q Q c) Co \ (,) C co O O \\ -� \ 0.00% PROPOSED ADA SLOPE < o L o Co I k I °\° G:944.87) ME:943.49 `�� - ^ _ c m /% \ ¢ i- u' w • I ME:945.04) rn ti/ (G:945.19 ' (G:945.01 ME:943.09 O \ z N I M T/G:944.95 x \ .o ME:944.96 J (945.80 rn \\ME:943.00 \ - \ )) v) u.i � w 946.34� �_ �n_ - - // \ tIrriiGRADING PLAN NOTES w ° Y v-- ) o0 7.q° f rn T/G:943.82 mi. r - - � W d 1c9 ) 946.42 3 \ Olik 943.12I w ct / ` \ T/G:943.70 -(94314 \ 1. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF APPLE VALLEY, 2 w EOF:943.71�I /-- SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. Y 3 9 (G:943.12 I\ 1 - N H ME:943.00� c� cn �, zs CBMHST-6 C;' 2. CONTRACTOR TO CALL GOPHER STATE CALL ONE @ 1-800-252-1166 AT LEAST TWO0946.50� rr / RE:943.20- WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. 0• N IE:939.70 S \ 3. STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: / G:945.66) \ j° 45 LF-12"SD_ HDPE:0"-10"PER AASHTO M-252 U Q @ 1.00% IHDPE: 12"OR GREATER PER ASTM F-2306 o / .7r '/ co [1 .--------1----- PVC SCH.40 PER ASTM D-1785 I I 13.8% ADJUST TO FINISHED GRADE- -942 -I--- IA STORM SEWER FITTINGS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: U) - SWITCH TO SOLID CASTING 2°I0 �Q HDPE PER ASTM 3212 U I I J I • �► 5 ` - PVC PER ASTM D-3034,JOINTS PER ASTM D-3212 w p / 946.41� 945.87 I -II i m `� m I( I T/G:946.21 ST-5 ❑ ❑ o 4. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OR EXISTING c z CONNECT TO �\ Q z i_ ,ter f6 w 1$% EXISTING MH UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF SITE GRADING. THE cc a z o F 1712. ___.....-\\ 945.90) CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY a 0 cn cn L I DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS. cc w = a 3\ IE:939.25 N i w - cn w ui m 946.50 IE:935.12 SE I zz a > w F o i 946.41) 1 acwO� w Oz E T/G:946.27 � a aci r z c.i \ '� , , 945.93 4.7% ME:941.28 5. SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TO ct F w I- z J o I RETAIL ,� ° J �� Ill HELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES. E Q o Z < WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT,THE < w x Co / FFE: 946.50 1 a�° w w w o I \ o I 945.97 EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF EXISTING o Q X a) co �I G:944.10� I PAVEMENT. LL O w _ x cc a) O ❑ z X 1 \ G:945.82) ay - 944.48) \ ji 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL. o v z < w o X Q t ROOF DRAIN \ I I 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM co - D - Z z w LO Q \ IE:939.84 E c'' rn �I SEWER ALIGNMENTS. w w QI-o z Q LO L \ / CC C _ �,„_ I U w E- w L 0 \ I ° ADJUST CASTING TO I__ I 8. GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES.CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TO ' Co FINISHED GRADE -� SUBGRADE ELEVATION AND LEAVE STREET READY FOR SUBBASE. U m p S,I 1 \ \ 3 9. ALL EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING,CONCRETE ITEMS,ANY ABANDONED U N N \ co/ rn 7 0I 0 i UTILITY ITEMS,AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF in o w o 3 rn I THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 3 oM W N , } a ° I I \ ' ♦ 1 a o a ❑ m o 69 LF-12"SD •,7r I 10. REFER TO THE UTILITY PLAN FOR SANITARY SEWER MAIN,WATER MAIN SERVICE Q z z w \ 7.1% \ \ @ 1.00% ` rn I LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS AND CASTING/STRUCTURE NOTATION. Y J C7 U U I P ME:941.29) U wa _ )E c 13. % 1 y\ 11. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS AND CURB ANDO o _ ST-3IF i i GUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE. Z o ADJUST TO FINISHED GRADE- CONNECT TO \ (946.50 SWITCH TO SOLID CASTING 12. INSTALL A MINIMUM OF 4"CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE UNDER CURB AND GUTTER AND p EXISTING MH c / 946.40\ 11 \ IE:934.99 NE V CONCRETE SIDEWALKS. • - (946.40 IE:939.15 SI 0 <IC g46 13. UPON COMPLETION OF EXCAVATION AND FILLING,CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL Z / ME:946.07 •p 2.3� IE:939.15 W \ �/ STREETS AND DISTURBED AREAS ON SITE. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE Z J I (ME:946.11 �° ` o G:944.95) cn rn° L IRE-VEGETATEDWITHAMINIMUMOF4"OFTOPSOIL. �94551)G:945.87_c < 0- LI (G:944.78 LF-12"SD 14. ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS/CONTOURS ARE TO GUTTER/FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE Z ° I �4, ■ @ 1.00% NOTED. \ \ 2so \ - 0 w < i -� 15. GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS, PATIOS, PASSENGER DROP-OFFS,AND ACCESSIBLE Ct a°i \ I ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSING DRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADAZ0U, G:945.84� \ STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 \1 \ I II I VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL. IN NO CASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED U .� ) I I \ 26% CBMH ST-4 2%. IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINAL SIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE 0 �� 9A6 \°� RE:943qz) .24 I SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS OR AISLES EXCEED 2%(1.5%TARGET)IN ALL N L I `L• IE:939.74 N DIRECTIONS.SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL BUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE Z /' ADA COMPLIANT.CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA \` (n \ ��?°\O I CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TO PAVING. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE 0 C o G:946.14 �-� ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A.D.A COMPLIANCE ISSUES. I- Ce l< G:944.18) I \ IL , G:944.68 �G:943.20 943.61� U I 16. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 0.5%GUTTER SLOPE TOWARDS LOW POINTS. 0 0 K Q 1 L r EOF:943.80 I < c I 17. ROOF DRAIN INVERT CONNECTIONS AT THE BUILDING SHALL BE AT ELEVATION 940.00 OR �/ 1.1 I I I . 0.. L - - - _ - - LOWER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. REFERENCE MEP PLANS FOR ROOF DRAIN u- J -� 2.7% DRAINAGE&UTILITY EASEMENT 1 gq3 1 �_- - - �\ \ CONNECTION. ''�^^ 7co c 46 / • i (G:943.03 i(�\ �_ �I l`� V J Z \ \CS) aa I �g h , �3 942.38 ME:941.91 \ / 18. ALL STORM SEWER CONNECTIONS SHALL BE GASKETED AND WATER TIGHT INCLUDING \ ob' 0) G:943.90) �' 942 49 �� - - -�/ - -_ MANHOLE CONNECTIONS. Z 9 CO \ \ 46. \ ME:943.62 I 0 J N -a �l / \ \ /� \ A 19. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AIR TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT 0 o I \ I PLUMBING CODE. 0 W aci / I / IME:941.92) 20. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 1.25%SLOPE IN BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AREAS,0.5%SLOPE IN 0 Liu L I / ME:942.06 / CONCRETE PAVEMENT AREAS. I / Q 0 I ME:941.70�/ U / 21. CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT"INFALL CURB" U- O ZU) I WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS TOWARD GUTTER,AND"OUTFACE"CURB WHERE PAVEMENTDRAINS AWAY FROM GUTTER. H U cI11 /i . / < < I. - 22. CN=83 ♦/� ca Co k�o) ■ 1 .1 _' ,O IM ■ . ■ ., ■ ■ O I Sr l l O O v♦ LL ET ZI I.L J a 0 W co o I /� \ \ ® r r a . iy u oco >_ I I��I� �� 4a C 1 - - -- C) J LLJ _ A. - - - - . - - - -_____ 1 - = NORTH ® Q °' I - - - - �1� - ' ' - \ i a - \ Z > _- - - 811 - J w > sn / in - / \ o / 1 I nd < GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEETJ a a \ a 0 �0 20 4o Know what's below. ICI a O a / \ \ I < a ¢ SHEET NUMBER u) I \ �/ \I A [1 II Call before you dig. S / 1 11 C500 1- U LEGEND ui .5 I I 1 II a i11 EXISTING PROPOSED o I QII 1 w ►/ GATE VALVE 0 II III 4 HYDRANT co 1 IIIIb IIII Q 4 REDUCER I I \\Iii lam) r"'I TEE °) :III I SO O SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE Y �oSANITARY CLEANOUT o I I WATERMAINIcE= z I I I r - 1 SANITARY SEWER F I I I e° I I - > - STORM SEWER 5 _. , 4 f _ _ /�/ ELC ELC UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC /// COM COM TELEPHONE _ _ �� GAS— GAS GAS MAIN - 4 LL_-�\ /� \� I it /// O a Ill I( ll _ 1(i i I \ ° d ° I \I ° ii ° �� % I '� UTILITY PLAN NOTES0 U) \ < 4 >i \ z Q \ �_ �j = �� ° `\\ \\ 1. ALL FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE IN PLACE,AND COMPACTED BEFORE INSTALLATION OF - I \ - `_ __ // ' NL. �� ® ❑ ❑ ® PROPOSED UTILITIES. / , \ / 2. SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: I E co \ 8"PVC SDR35 PER ASTM D-3034, FOR PIPES LESS THAN 12'DEEP a 8"PVC SDR26 PER ASTM D-3034, FOR PIPES MORE THAN 12'DEEP N_,i- � - - - - - - 6"PVC SCHEDULE 40 PER ASTM D-1785 IIMMI E . DUCTILE IRON PIPE PER AWWA C150 2 .... .......................... CD d in 3. WATER LINES SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: z g o - \ 6"AND LARGER, PVC C-900 PER ASTM D 2241 w \ CLASS 200 UNDER COUNTY ROADS,OTHERWISE CLASS 150 a QQ - - --- co 4"AND LARGER DUCTILE IRON PIPE PER AWWA C150 U p pp W W W W W W W 4, 4, 4, 4, W SMALLER THAN 3"PIPING SHALL BE COPPER TUBE TYPE"K"PER O H II 4, 4, W W W W W y W 4, 4, 4, 4, 4 / - - - -�\ ANSI 816.22 OR PVC,200 P.S.I., PER ASTM D1784 AND D2241. IIII � o 7- -0 ct m 0 4. MINIMUM TRENCH WIDTH SHALL BE 2 FEET. C° = w w w w w w 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, w ^ o v 0 O W W W W W W W W 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, W \\\\\\\\\\ - - - III 1 Q H aJ w `- w .N — L. `l `l `l `l `l \ _ _ J�/ ��' 5. ALL WATER JOINTS ARE TO BE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH RESTRAINTS SUCH AS THRUST C4 U) w 2 N Ir — J BLOCKING,WITH STAINLESS STEEL OR COBALT BLUE BOLTS,OR AS INDICATED IN THE p z Y u ��\ _ _L CITY SPECIFICATIONS AND PROJECT DOCUMENTS. >11111CIII) } w a • C I • ° I 6. ALL UTILITIES SHOULD BE KEPT TEN(10')APART(PARALLEL)OR WHEN CROSSING 18" �} VERTICAL CLEARANCE(OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE TO OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE ORMIME Y w (4 d W I STRUCTURE). N H 3 I i 4 W N (n O p ' W ° W I 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 8'COVER ON ALL WATERLINES. N w -c 1 — w I v r� CO W I 8. IN THE EVENT OF A VERTICAL CONFLICT BETWEEN WATER LINES,SANITARY LINES, 4 I STORM LINES AND GAS LINES,OR ANY OBSTRUCTION(EXISTING AND PROPOSED),THE W . I SANITARY LINE SHALL BE SCH.40 OR C900 WITH MECHANICAL JOINTS AT LEAST 10 FEET 4o ON EITHER SIDE OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE CROSSING.THE WATER LINE SHALL HAVE o N ,i, v W MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH APPROPRIATE FASTENERS AS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A U W a . I I MINIMUM OF 18"VERTICAL SEPARATION. MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI A21.10 OR .1, ANSI 21.11 (AWWA C-151)(CLASS 50). c _ CONNECT TO EXISTING v WATER STUB W/8"x 6" ° Si' 9. LINES UNDERGROUND SHALL BE INSTALLED, INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE C0 O rn oco BACKFILLING. Ui Q < ,N. BEND AND 6"GATE VALVE •u' I o < w ° 4, I < z01- d- V `I' ° 10. TOPS OF MANHOLES SHALL BE RAISED AS NECESSARY TO BE FLUSH WITH PROPOSED w 0 w ui a`> w Si, I I PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS,AND TO BE ONE FOOT ABOVE FINISHED GROUND ELEVATIONS, IN zz a j F 2 w w O IIBEND RETAIL ° W GREEN AREAS,WITH WATERTIGHT LIDS. a Q a a O - ,1, ' FFE: 946.50 w ° W �� o � zci II 11. ALL CONCRETE FOR ENCASEMENTS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 28 DAY COMPRESSION = w Q - I CONNECT TO 11 LF-8"PVC 4, LJ O p W ~ � 3 I- < x co EXISTING STUB @ 2.00% . W W = w w w w x -c — I STRENGTH AT 3000 P.S.I. a z CONNECT TO BUILDING COORDINATE WITH MEP W 12. EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE VERIFIED IN FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY NEW } - ix x co IE:939.50 W ,1, I - LINES. F z 2 _1 o _ c a> • W wi� oz x ., W U 13. REFER TO INTERIOR PLUMBING DRAWINGS FOR TIE-IN OF ALL UTILITIES. v a o Q x 1- x -6 .1, mU� Qw0 SS-1 y W 14. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING TO THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE CITY LU v- - z w w E Q DROP STRUCTURE y W w w O < c7 ' L OF APPLE VALLEY AND/OR STATE OF MN WITH REGARDS TO MATERIALS AND a w = z z a o a RE:945.54 , � 1 ;117 COC') (`_t 0 INSTALLATION OF THE WATER AND SEWER LINES. w l0 u) IE:939.27 E — IE:923.21 W W 15. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION Z U m M I ' - 1 OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE U O Q > N 0 4, VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES,AND WHERE POSSIBLE,MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE w o N O E y W FIELD.THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE.THE o W o N 3 '1' 6"FIRE WATER SERVICE c�> > } 6"x 2"TEE W/GATE VALVE ■ `1' I CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS W co co � Q m m ° 2"DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE W BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT SHALL a o 0 m o 6"x 6"BEND W/GATE VALVE 4, ^ v ® BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES i 4- 4- w z z Y a> V I TRANSFORMER PAD tP c7 N --��IIJ W 1 WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. Y Q ( a w _0 -a -_51P,� ELECTRIC SERVICE .1, 111 I I w o o 0 J 4' 16. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR N a> / -- IN C)0 J 'I' I CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICE COMPANIES. Oo o CONNECT FRANCHISE UTILITIES IN GAS SERVICE 4, Z ° ROW.CONTRACTOR TO WORK W/ TELECOMM SERVICE `1' I 17. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR INSTALLATION a- PRIVATE UTILITY COMPANIES ON - \ �/ I REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS. EXACT LOCATIONS&CONNECTIONS. y J -0 5 + I 18. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH/MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING AND Z + 1 W ELECTRICAL PLAN. Q } L 1 I 19. BACKFLOW DEVICES(DDCV AND PRZ ASSEMBLIES)AND METERS ARE LOCATED IN THE o `1' W I INTERIOR OF THE BUILDING.REF.ARCH/MEP PLANS. sle CL o 1 I 20. ALL ONSITE WATERMAINS AND SANITARY SEWERS SHALL BE PRIVATELY OWNED AND I cE _ W �� ,I W I MAINTAINED. 1 `1' 21. ALL WATERMAIN STUBOUTS SHALL BE MECHANICALLY RESTRAINED WITH REACTION U 1 BLOCKING. U J _ sl, 4, 4, . W W W W W W 0 `�' IIZ _C / W O E E. 4Y W W 4' W W W W W - W W W W W W W W W Eo 1i W W .l' W W W W W W W W W W W W W TI L Q DRAINAGE&UTILITY EASEMENT =___ 11 D(vc I t,le 4, uV uV � II 1\ ( ) z �, J o _ E 4, 4, 4, 4, 4' 4' 4' 4' 4, 4' 4' 4, W W Z — I 0 o 2 II \\ c > U W CI cn I \ �-,.. V w U) 41 A' 1 ; : ■ ■ ■ ` ■ << ,o — —11 - - - - a N Q - I / CI ~ o 0p a OC ►---- r �r a J w Z w w >_ e d L 0 M� (�„) \ / ° ° ° ,I. d e ° I / /� ea a °° d ° gO ° °, e-, ° //// _° ' T ce a W i .L. ._ - - - - - - — - - - 1-0) � - - - - - V J- C ° NORTH Q IX 0 J ' d81 0 O O Q -3 A. o IIISIpli z w LL! ° °` °d o e e CO d° e e A d ■■r■ a ELI DI 4- ° I _ ° r OGRAPHOIC S2A�LE IN FEE 4� Know what's below. JU ° w Q ° I _ I \\ I 4 � � Call before you dig. SHEET NUMBER s 0 C600 1- U LANDSCAPE KEYNOTES O LANDSCAPE LEGEND `° ' � O EDGER (TYP.) w U 11 1 ° LI H a 11 OB DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH (TYP.) \ o< -0 11 1 1 t ilk 09 11 C SOD TYP. EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE (TYP.) 1 b 11 c ) �� Li, 11 1 11 11 a 1 11 I 11 0 1 + EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE (TYP.) co 11 11 ♦ III Ct a� 11 /// 0 EXISTING SHRUB (TYP.) 1 f �� EDGER (TYP.) \\ a Qi �, ® /�/ I , ❑ I APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF SOD/ IRRIGATION, A� a ° /A \, a° \\ ° a� ll / >\ SOD ALL DISTURBED AREAS (TYP.) zd cisc �\ _ /I 0\ —= � ./ \ • LANDSCAPE SUMMARY a \ IMMI . I _ _ _ _ _ _ LANDSCAPE YARD REQUIRED: 15' � LANDSCAPE YARD PROVIDED: SEE PLAN o - O Z T Z Z \ LANDSCAPE ISLANDS REQUIRED: 1,174 S.F. (2.00%)-58,714 S.F. (0.02) uj o A • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •■ _ \ LANDSCAPE ISLANDS PROVIDED: 740 S.F. w m I �� Q Q 2 ■■ �. \ ISLAND TREE PLANTINGS REQUIRED: 8-2.5"CAL.TREES=(1,174 S.F.OF ISLAND UO 0 aco ii 5 KFG 3 - BLC 5 WLC \ ■/�� A AREA/150 S.F.) u) u) 7- -0 © 3 -ANH 5- KFG 3 -ANH— © \ 7 - PDS ■*a* \ _�\ — \ ISLAND TREE PLANTINGS PROVIDED: 8-2.5"CAL.TREES ^ Q o Oz \ �OO OOA 001� 4Oa �% 13 RBC \\\ " CODE REQUIRES THAT THE TOTAL COST OF THE LANDSCAPING ON-SITE SHALL BE EQUAL TO 2.5%OF THE Z w TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST. PER THE FOLLOWING CALCULATION,THE PROJECT SHOULD ONLY BE 1 a H w N 5 -WLC 3 - BLC 5- KFG 0 co I� 4( *"ft N:MMI,�_ — ��l \G) REQUIRED TO PROVIDE 1.94%OF THE OVERALL CONSTRUCTION COST IN LANDSCAPING: Q c) Eli .oita 1( yr III. 1 , — i_ -c 0 I) \0 N CU . w ca .j .r -. ■ .- it t 1att" 000 O.S . 1 - IHL I 1 I I _ c~n 13 - FAS I W-=e 13 19 Y co . 4 - DBH III PLANT SCHEDULE N N H 0 7- PDS 3 -TAU 3 -ANH - 1 - HCK IN ill N w 2 O I 13 - FAS 3 -TAU ii I DECIDUOUS TREES CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT CAL/SIZE N- .3 0 7 - RBC Al 1 - BOL i 4 - KFG 0 3 - BLC i I I Af 01 7 RBC • _® III BOL 2 TILIA AMERICANA 'BOULEVARD' BOULEVARD LINDEN B & B 2.5" CAL. I V i■ 3 -AN 1�0 ■ g i4 -TAU ,,I ' �',' > a © ■ III 41011. HCK 2 CELTIS OCCIDENTALIS COMMON HACKBERRY B & B 2.5" CAL. } 5 - RSV '. ��; ■ III o o o N c ° w z a Nr ■ IHL 4 GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS VAR. INERMIS 'IMPERIAL' IMPERIAL HONEYLOCUST B & B 2.5" CAL. Q z o a ■ W ° „) J J II \ CLUww a a4 ■ I III CONIFEROUS SHRUBS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT cc o 1- SPACING a a a W tE a ° Y Z E 1 a 7 - RBC �� ,�� ■ z � � wZQ ° �� a3 I • 4 - KFG \ HMA 7 THUJA OCCIDENTALIS 'HOLMSTRUP' HOLMSTRUP ARBORVITAE #5 CONT. 3' O.C. Q a w w v < ° 2 wCC - U CO W W -I X �I 3 - BLC 1 ICI LLo� � = ? = X S 10 - PDS 0 - 2 - IHL TAU 29 TAXUS X MEDIA 'TAUNTONII� TAUTON YEW #5 CONT. 5' O.C. 1- z D I � QE 1r 0 0 ■ ! 1 _rz -La° X CO • O - II WLi_ � Q� � Q O � 0 ■ DECIDUOUS SHRUBS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT SPACING w w o Q z w CV42.., ■ �� 0 0 _ \ ANH 15 HYDRANGEA ARBORESCENS 'ANNABELLE' ANNABELLE HYDRANGEA #5 CONT. 4' O.C. Z Y Y U o a3 N 4 TAU 611 ■ 1 0 U U U 3 -ANH `� s"- ■ I 0 BLC 21 ARONIA MELANOCARPA'IROQUOIS BEAUTY' TM IROQUOIS BEAUTY BLACK CHOKEBERRY #5 CONT. 4' O.C. L w o u) Cu 10 - PDS 0 O I m � Q � a m } 0 3-TAU 0 1 ■ 11 \ DBH 23 DIERVILLA LONICERA DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLE #5 CONT. 3' O.C. Y J z z > Lu O 9- BES 10 - PDS a co a w Z dl d— 4 - KFG 6 - PDSIII CO o o O W�� - 13 - BES ■mil 1 l\ RSV 5 AMELANCHIER ALNIFOLIA'REGENT' REGENT SERVICEBERRY #5 CONT. 5' O.C. Z O 1 0- ,� �';, ;; •■ I 1I Q -„ © ■ V PERENNIALS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT SPACING CL in II 0 0 I 4 - KFG 3= BLC 0 : 11 BES 43 RUDBECKIA FULGIDA'GOLDSTURM' BLACK-EYED SUSAN #1 CONT 18" O.C. < i- 10 3 -TAU 3 TAU I1 LLI 0 0 10 7_HMA ■ 0 0 -..will 6 KFG 1 - BOL A\\ CL < _ I 0 12 - PDS FAS 26 ASTILBE X ARENDSII 'FANAL' FANAL ASTILBE #1 CONT 15" O.C. a 1� �'' ,' 1 - HCK ■ I �� :�- _w�.. A 10 - DBH ■ III > > > V in .� 00 1 - IHL �'�i �i a) "= "= ; " KFG 52 CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA'KARL FOERSTER' KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS #1 CONT 30" O.C. Z 8 0 9- DBH >;', >;', > V♦ 8 - PDS --�■ � � � 0 CI co o �'a,�'�' � 12 - BES 'l.,� 's0 ■ V,�, I— c a 0 II 'l V ;'1f J PDS 70 SPOROBOLUS HETEROLEPIS PRAIRIE DROPSEED #1 CONT 24" O.C. Q 0 ■ 11 IL D Q Q ' .1 c,) . 1 Q 3 -TAU 3 BLC \ I — — \//, , , , I f RBC 34 ECHINACEA PURPUREA'RUBY STAR' RUBY STAR CONEFLOWER #1 CONT 20" O.C. Z m a3 5 - KFG 3 -TAU ■ I 0 c \ 5 -WLC 5 - KFG © 5 - KFG ■ I Z co a`, 3 - BLC 5-WLC ■ I O —Ito o r� ■ ' \/-A\ WLC 20 NEPETA X FAASSENII 'WALKERS LOW' WALKERS LOW CATMINT #1 CONT 30" O.C. 0 w Q n ■ . ■ WEDENE ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■I /ice, CC 0 Lu Lu Cu a Q ,L —Io Z (an U a N LL >. Ca N v I O 0 0 c OC �1 z � J aCIW � _ a � � 11 � � Q w Z � -> 71 Z 00 > inm a a r ( �� I. . ° fl SHEET NUMBER 1- T a a a_ L100 d C m (n a) as NOTES: LANDSCAPE NOTES w cnc Q Q 1. SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT COMMON GROUND ALLIANCE AT 811 OR CALL811.COM TO VERIFY 0 as 2. PROCEED WITH CORRECTIVE PRUNING. LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PLANTS OR E \ 3. SET PLANT ON UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL OR LANDSCAPE MATERIAL. o_ THOROUGHLY COMPACTED PLANTING SOIL. 0 INSTALL PLANT SO THE ROOT FLARE IS AT OR UP 2. ACTUAL LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL IS SUBJECT TO FIELD AND SITE CONDITIONS. E TO 2"ABOVE THE FINISHED GRADE WITH BURLAP Y AND WIRE BASKET, (IF USED), INTACT. ON CENTER SPACING 3. NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED o >, _ �' 4. SLIT REMAINING TREATED BURLAP AT 6" AS STATED ON PLAN. IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. z 0 1 INTERVALS. as 5. BACKFILL TO WITHIN APPROXIMATELY 12" OF THE EXTEND HOLE EXCAVATION WIDTH 4. ALL SUBSTITUTIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO SUBMISSION o TOP OF THE ROOTBALL, THEN WATER PLANT. A MINIMUM OF 6" BEYOND OF ANY BID AND/OR QUOTE BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. Lu cC REMOVE THE TOP 1/3 OF THE BASKET OR THE TOP THE PLANTS ROOT SYSTEM. TWO HORIZONTAL RINGS WHICHEVER IS 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TWO YEAR GUARANTEE OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS. THE GREATER. REMOVE ALL BURLAP AND NAILS FROM GUARANTEE BEGINS ON THE DATE OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S OR OWNER'S WRITTEN THE TOP 1/3 OF THE BALL. REMOVE ALL TWINE. ACCEPTANCE OF THE INITIAL PLANTING. REPLACEMENT PLANT MATERIAL SHALL HAVE A ONE d REMOVE OR CORRECT STEM GIRDLING ROOTS. YEAR GUARANTEE COMMENCING UPON PLANTING. - 6. PLUMB AND BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL. I_ - . 1-I 1 1 FINISHED GRADE 7. WATER THOROUGHLY WITHIN 2 HOURS TO E1 - ' ` • • - EDGER, AS SPECIFIED 6. ALL PLANTS TO BE SPECIMEN GRADE, MINNESOTA-GROWN AND/OR HARDY. SPECIMEN GRADE as SETTLE PLANTS AND FILL VOIDS. -_ _ 1-1 • _ SHALL ADHERE TO, BUT IS NOT LIMITED BY, THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS: ° 8. BACK FILL VOIDS AND WATER SECOND TIME. -11 III- � _ ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM DISEASE, PESTS, WOUNDS, SCARS, ETC. z Q 9. PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE SECOND -1 I-I -I ' ' • I -1 ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM NOTICEABLE GAPS, HOLES, OR DEFORMITIES. KEN OR DEAD BRANCHES. a WATERING UNLESS SOIL MOISTURE IS EXCESSIVE. -I I -i - 11-1 I- I-�I = = PREPARED PLANTING BED AND ALL PLANTS SHALL HAVE HEAVY,- 11-11 ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE O HEALM OTHY BRANCHING AND LEAFING. Oc 2X ROOT BALL WIDTH 10. FINAL OWNER. CATION OF TREE TO BE APPROVED BY BACKFILL SOIL CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL HAVE AN ESTABLISHED MAIN LEADER AND A HEIGHT TO WIDTH RATIO (THOROUGHLY LOOSENED) OF NO LESS THAN 5:3. LEM v E DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH d '0 7. PLANTS TO MEET AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK (ANSI Z60.1-2014 OR MOSTCD _0 SOD NOTES: z z CURRENT VERSION) REQUIREMENTS FOR SIZE AND TYPE SPECIFIED. - c g 4" TOPSOIL F ui Q 1. SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. 8. PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER MNLA &ANSI STANDARD PLANTING PRACTICES. < Cl-< a 2. PROCEED WITH CORRECTIVE PRUNING OF TOP AND ROOT. o , o 0 `6 - - -- 3. REMOVE CONTAINER AND SCORE OUTSIDE OF SOIL MASS TO REDIRECT 9. PLANTS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY PLANTED UPON ARRIVAL AT SITE. PROPERLY HEEL-IN MATERIALS ^ Cl) Cl) m AND PREVENT CIRCLING FIBROUS ROOTS. REMOVE OR CORRECT STEM IF NECESSARY; TEMPORARY ONLY. a o u 0 co 4-7-14-1-7T T 'i1'- 1-r�f�" I- I I I-I I-I IIII ' GIRDLING ROOTS. z 7 w toc 11 1 - - I-I HI 1 4. PLUMB AND BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL. 10. PRIOR TO PLANTING, FIELD VERIFY THAT THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLARE IS LOCATED AT THE TOP >I._ z D .. -I o = I I=1 I 5. WATER THOROUGHLY WITHIN 2 HOURS TO SETTLE PLANTS AND FILL OF THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE. IF THIS IS NOT THE CASE, SOIL SHALL BE REMOVED DOWN TO o - Z •Y PLANTING SOIL - -I I - - - -I VOIDS. THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLARE. WHEN THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE IS PLANTED, THE ROOT w w _ , -I I, I - I - I - I-I I-I -I I - IeL I_ 6. BACK FILL VOIDS AND WATER SECOND TIME. COLLAR/ROOT FLARE SHALL BE EVEN OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. _1 I 0 I _1 1 II II I II 1 1 1 7. PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE SECOND WATERING UNLESS Y (n SOIL MOISTURE IS EXCESSIVE. 11. OPEN TOP OF BURLAP ON BB MATERIALS; REMOVE POT ON POTTED PLANTS; SPLIT AND BREAK N 1(7) 5 8. MIX IN 3-4" OF ORGANIC COMPOST. APART PEAT POTS. CV 0 w N- TREE PLANTING DETAIL SHRUB / PERENNIAL PLANTING DETAIL 12. PRUNE PLANTS AS NECESSARY- PER STANDARD NURSERY PRACTICE AND TO CORRECT POOR 1BRANCHING OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES. E SCALE: N.T.S. L101 SCALE: N.T.S. L101 0 13. WRAP ALL SMOOTH-BARKED TREES - FASTEN TOP AND BOTTOM. REMOVE BY APRIL 1ST. cn lc 14. STAKING OF TREES AS REQUIRED; REPOSITION, PLUMB AND STAKE IF NOT PLUMB AFTER ONE 0 YEAR. m ,L 08 LAWN SIDE PLANTING BED Luz z `° 15. THE NEED FOR SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE DETERMINED UPON SITE SOIL CONDITIONS PRIOR TO a z U a U) E PLANTING. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR THE NEED OF cc o w w a a ANY SOIL AMENDMENTS. Q a 1Y o E Q o 2 N jI'♦I, c _, < w . K Y z Q � -III-III-III-III-III��/ _ 16. BACKFILL SOIL AND TOPSOIL TO ADHERE TO MN/DOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 3877 (LOAM , o F w ? F o° c I TOPSOIL BORROW)AND TO BE EXISTING TOP SOIL FROM SITE FREE OF ROOTS, ROCKS LARGER Q w w v o0 c� `�° III-III-III-III-III - - - - - THAN ONE INCH, SUBSOIL DEBRIS, AND LARGE WEEDS UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE. MINIMUM 10• o = = z = x a°, -� I I =1 = 1= I =1 = 1= I I 4" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR ALL LAWN GRASS AREAS AND 12" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR TREE, SHRUBS, AND F o _, L c X III III III ill III III I I PERENNIALS. o o Q LL ill-1 II I �-III-III U ~ o Q W Uw X N FINISHED GRADE AT LAWN, - % I 1=� FINISHED GRADE AT 17. MULCH TO BE AT ALL TREE, SHRUB, PERENNIAL, AND MAINTENANCE AREAS. TREE AND SHRUB co - < o < w CV a 1/2" BELOW TOP OF DIVIDER. 0 SHRUBS/ PERENNIALS, 1" BELOW TOP PLANTING BEDS SHALL HAVE 4" DEPTH OF DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. DOUBLE = a ° = Q = Q No Q V OF DIVIDER. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH TO BE USED AROUND ALL PLANTS WITHIN TURF AREAS. - 0)m ~ J ~ 0 PERENNIAL AND ORNAMENTAL GRASS BEDS SHALL HAVE 2" DEPTH DOUBLE SHREDDED z < < o HARDWOOD MULCH. MULCH TO BE FREE OF DELETERIOUS MATERIAL AND NATURAL IN COLOR, OR H O Y I a) € APPROVED EQUAL. ROCK MULCH TO BE RIVER ROCK, 1 1/2" DIAMETER, AT MINIMUM 3" DEPTH, OR w X X = APPROVED EQUAL. ROCK MULCH TO BE ON COMMERCIAL GRADE FILTER FABRIC, BY TYPAR, OR w U) O X 1- X c) } E 8 APPROVED EQUAL WITH NO EXPOSURE. MULCH AND FABRIC TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER PRIOR X o X ¢ o } m o PLASTIC DIVIDER: TO INSTALLATION. MULCH TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE). Q X X z m o z a) "BLACK DIAMOND" EDGING BY 1 X x w 0 "0 VALEEY VIEW SPECIALTIES CO. 18. EDGING TO BE COMMERCIAL GRADE VALLEY-VIEW BLACK DIAMOND (OR EQUAL) POLY EDGING OR Y 0 o o 2 2 USE 20 FT. LENGTHS. USE SPADED EDGE, AS INDICATED. POLY EDGING SHALL BE PLACED WITH SMOOTH CURVES AND 0 �; KNURLED CONNECTOR AT SPLICES, STAKED WITH METAL SPIKES NO GREATER THAN 4 FOOT ON CENTER WITH BASE OF TOP BEAD AT (./5 a USE CORNER, TEE, VEE, OR WIDE GRADE, FOR MOWERS TO CUT ABOVE WITHOUT DAMAGE. UTILIZE CURBS AND SIDEWALKS FOR _1D ANBLE CONNECTORS AT ANGLE Q e)- EDGING WHERE POSSIBLE. SPADED EDGE TO PROVIDE V-SHAPED DEPTH AND WIDTH TO CREATE CHANGES. SEPARATION BETWEEN MULCH AND GRASS. INDIVIDUAL TREE, SHRUB, OR RAIN-GARDEN BEDS TO wp a BE SPADED EDGE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. EDGING TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS (WHERE 111 d 10" X 7/8" METAL ANCHOR APPLICABLE). a STAKES AT 48" O.C., AND AT Q Cin C.) ,2 EACH END. 19. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDED OR SEEDED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PARKING LOT1114( .1 ISLANDS TO BE SODDED WITH SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH AROUND ALL TREES AND SHRUBS. z ° SOD TO BE STANDARD MINNESOTA GROWN AND HARDY BLUEGRASS MIX, FREE OF LAWN WEEDS.Q U) �/ ALL TOPSOIL AREAS TO BE RAKED TO REMOVE DEBRIS AND ENSURE DRAINAGE. SLOPES OF 3:1 J cu e POLY EDGER DETAIL OR GREATER SHALL BE STAKED. SEED AS SPECIFIED AND PER MN/DOT SPECIFICATIONS. IF NOT Q .E INDICATED ON LANDSCAPE PLAN, SEE EROSION CONTROL PLAN. 1 ih SCALE: N.T.S. L101 Z a- Z Q a) .L 20. PROVIDE IRRIGATION TO ALL PLANTED AREAS ON SITE. IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE DESIGN/BUILD Z c j a)) BY LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS TO O C o LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM. EL CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE OPERATION MANUALS, AS-BUILT PLANS, AND NORMAL PROGRAMMING. U p E SYSTEM SHALL BE WINTERIZED AND HAVE SPRING STARTUP DURING FIRST YEAR OF OPERATION. Q SYSTEM SHALL HAVE ONE-YEAR WARRANTY ON ALL PARTS AND LABOR. ALL INFORMATION ABOUT U INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. SYSTEM Ct as SHALL INCLUDE A RAIN SENSOR AND APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY. I- o m (/) z 0 .c 21. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE NECESSARY WATERING OF PLANT MATERIALS UNTIL THE PLANT IS Z 2 FULLY ESTABLISHED OR IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS OPERATIONAL. OWNER WILL NOT PROVIDE WATER() J o 0 FOR CONTRACTOR. U Q W 5 U) 22. REPAIR, REPLACE, OR PROVIDE SOD/SEED AS REQUIRED FOR ANY ROADWAY BOULEVARD AREAS 120 W a 0„) ADJACENT TO THE SITE DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION. a.) a u) o -7' 23. REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO PROPERTY FROM PLANTING OPERATIONS AT NO COST TO OWNER. 0 J O Z v) aN LLQ � o . 24. MAINTAIN TREES, SHRUBS, AND OTHER PLANTS UNTIL PROJECT COMPLETION, BUT IN NO CASE, O 0 W J U) LESS THAN FOLLOWING PERIOD; 1 YEAR AFTER PROJECT COMPLETION. MAINTAIN TREES, SHRUBS, 0 f a W AND OTHER PLANTS BY PRUNING12 8 , CULTIVATING, AND WEEDING AS REQUIRED FOR HEALTHY Z J d co o GROWTH. RESTORE PLANTING SAUCERS. TIGHTEN AND REPAIR STAKE AND GUY SUPPORTS AND I _ W Z RESET TREES AND SHRUBS TO PROPER GRADES OR VERTICAL POSITION AS REQUIRED. RESTORE • d n m O _cc) OR REPLACE DAMAGED WRAPPINGS. SPRAY AS REQUIRED TO KEEP TREES AND SHRUBS FREE OF1/ U J W INSECTS AND DISEASE. REPLENISH MULCH TO THE REQUIRED DEPTH. MAINTAIN LAWNS FOR 45 < W 0 J CC ! DAYS AFTER INSTALLING SOD INCLUDING MOWING WHEN SOD RECITES 4" IN HEIGHT. WEED 0 0 ; PLANTING BEDS AND MULCH SAUCERS AT MINIMUM ONCE A MONTH DURING THE GROWING Z I j o SEASON. PROVIDE A MONTHLY REPORT TO THE OWNER ON WEEDING AND OTHER MAINTENANCE J J m 0 a 1` RESPONSIBILITIES. _ 0- _1 a) J a oI g 25. SEE ELECTRICAL PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING. IJJ o SHEET NUMBER I- 26. OWNER AND ARCHITECT TO CONFIRM SITE FURNISHINGS SUCH AS BENCHES, TABLES AND CHAIRS, L101 H AND TRASH/RECYCLING RECEPTACLES. ... •:... :.. CITY OF Apple Valley MEMO Public Works TO: Alex Sharpe, Planner FROM: Jodie Scheidt, PE,Civil Engineer DATE: November 29, 2022 SUBJECT: Orchard Place Block 1, Lot 2 Retail Site Plan Review per plans dated 11/17/2022 Alex, The following are comments regarding the Orchard Place Block 1, Lot 2 Retail site plan dated November 17, 2022. Please include these items as conditions to approval. General 1. All work and infrastructure within public easements or right of way shall be to City standards. 2. Provide a narrative of how the buildings will be constructed and any impacts.The narrative shall include the following: a. Shoring(if applicable) b. Material Storage. c. Haul routes to and from the site. d. Phasing 3. No construction work shall begin prior to a preconstruction meeting conference with a Public works and a Building Inspections representative. 4. Public Work Department(952-953-2400) shall be notified a minimum of 48 hours for any required water main shut downs and/or connections. 5. Add a detail sheet to the plans. Permits 6. Provide a copy of the executed Minnesota Department of Health, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Met Council, Department of Labor and any other required permits prior to construction. 7. Department of Labor and Industry(DOLT) shall review private utilities. 8. A right of way permit will be required for all work within public easements or right of way. 9. A Natural Resource Management Permit(NRMP)will be required prior to any land disturbing activity commences. Site 10. Include Auto turn drawing for service and emergency vehicles entering and leaving the site. 11. Show the location of manholes and gate valves and hydrants on the site plan. 12. All sidewalks at curb shall be ADA compliant. Grading&Drainage Plan 13. Final Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)shall be included with plans and shall be reviewed and approved by City Engineer. 14. Final Grading Plans shall be reviewed and approved by City Engineer. 15. Provide the overall site composite Curve Number(CN) along with the impervious%on the area tabulation. Storm Sewer 16. Final locations and sizes of Storm Sewer shall be reviewed with the final construction plans and approved by City Engineer. Sanitary Sewer and Water main 17. Final locations and sizes of Sanitary Sewer and Water main shall be reviewed with the final construction plans and approved by City Engineer. 18. Show the locations of the existing hydrants on the utility plan to show that there is coverage to the site. 19. The drop structure shall be constructed in accordance with City Detail plate SAN-4. 12/8/2022 Schuler Shoes Site Plan and Building Permit Authorization City Council 12-08-2022 AppValley Actions Requested Adopt a resolution approving site plan/building permit authorization to allow for construction of a 7,920-sq. ft. retail building for Schuler Shoes on Lot 2, Block 1, LB at Orchard Place. APP! IIey 1 12/8/2022 3 - es 1 - _ - -_ c, , 'f, -a-- c" - -• ' '• Site Location .. i 1/11 1 __,.. t t /7 Zoned RB . _ Retail ‘_,, I 40*-e,•-,.;.06,4 IA • ''' mxr--- -- - : v'-7_11rdr•_71 'AMIll=;,.. ''''' Business ... ,, , 0 • . 1 1 • ; i . i 1 1 I r- WI!MI 1H r ' 11 r" Fir f i I P ,,' . 1 Apple -•,,, ,.., I ITh- .. ;,, + 1 ll fill'6 -! 1 • .**4 I— • 1 -Prre:# ' 1 ITIOI g 1::•ii,i '..;-PEE:- ".'1:4KS- ° 1 4, -,-.:.,-. Final Plat - r -1- f-u 1 '• 441\L',-..— ,-, L j I 1 ,.... LB AT ORCHARD PLACE :: i H ,,,, ":, E) •...;.. ._-_, ... .6.- 1 c.: I 1 • I • r• r- V. 1 '-' -.=- BLOCK 1 LI :ii 2 q I • •• • • Mi 1 if me WALE . FM ez r, II L_ J ..1___• _111 l' E'.3 ..I 3 0 ''I 13 LU „ 1 ... _I ...,. .4.4.... .*:: , - Apple , ;_! Valley I I " 2 12/8/2022 11,07.777 , ...,„. AN A, Site Plan K�,i .� .. 1 za I iw�GROCERY o I w o lal o ■ �'i a N90b0'a0"E�: 580380AE Q�1 11 �„,.. FAA♦ 31 Fir' r {' ® I ime La 2h nurse o.wmuLL wr ..... {na Ei Y e e C ;pI . t&� vE N89_. _45 L®i w' h© ' Apple . 1 ■ g ,�G E i valley s o gvolflf -0 . Iv �_ Y � -- -, --- -..W9. .-�_-. ...... `gyp o y_, I. ---.c _ Site Plan , 1 �� . ., .. .. ,„ - .._ ... 1 I , = , ,1- o1a I r. : ii . , ,1_1_ I' : 1 , .1- -..-- 1 M hi,,_. . )°i n.,.m fi•r- Apple 3 12/8/2022 - i - ------- _ Grading Plan 1 -,f,- .............. . I Ii 0 —.LE L—, , t1 till r 7 ' L ' \ MI -11, 4 1, 'III , 1.71,,,.. i _., , ,1 \ , i I ill:L \ 111.-, 111 1-c s '-'- '' I 7 5-' — .., -- t W A • - I i i i .- `', i APPie Valley N e - • N • N o M- N ------, ,,,-- ' OA 7, 47-- .. ---- 1 , - T - Utility Plan i _ \L ,...,:‘, 1 .. . . L 11.1. , - 1.1.1 .... , ,.1. . .. N 1 r...,....v...illes.,., J ,.. j ' 0 '. .. III I\ IA \--` 7c1-- •:::::'::- Apple Valley Illf. - — , ---- 4 12/8/2022 F 1 . ...r.............................................- 1_andscape Plan 0 R. IL. 0'a • ,-2./- •..._1 1 f- ,., I:1 / A,,, . 1• = • -. 1-41.,- • 2 fa. • M 1,* s„ .- - , DM ,.... t.. 0 Apple 4 t IleY I 1 _ 0'I. 1 IT =============m Floor Plan & Trash Enclosure 1111111 '0 In n- / 1 ST= MIL ill a , _, am.ss.0.122a 7" PRCsr7POSE R BUILDING Il II ,-. ` ® I - Ats _ I iii i iiii iI , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I-0 1!I IF -11 3 --. • 1 c. 1 BR UK ROOM I ... 1 . . , 46 mi mg a u 3 1:toi a •:::•:::- Apple Valley _\ 5 12/8/2022 Building Elevations RTU-SEE CROSS (..2.) O © Q v SECTION EXHIBITS 1-1 MASONRY I ej TI MIRMASONRY - - BELOW FOR SCREENINGS - - _ \T -__...,- .. I Ti LON MASONRY \_ - V - - 1=r - ilik i Z A 1,i. i, LOOR I E SHEET AISVRE O a East 4* "P'VaIley Building Elevations \T \-1 \_/ O Rfil E CROSS O O `7' 7 7 SECTION EXHIBITS BELOW FOR SCREENING 6 I 0 - - - - 1 1 . / South North APP lley 6 12/8/2022 Building Elevations O TI HIGH MASONRY 2a-P I I I I I 0 TI51 MASONR Q. _ AK,I_ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 _ _ _ _ _ Tl LOW MASONRY "' - ' HIII.Pk SHO _8 8 _ tM M = — 1 f z \ - ', West ab 'Valley Rendering • . _ .. .. .. . ..-...., . .. N..„.. .„,, ..,. . . , ....... . -_,„:,.-„... ,,,,-__._.,,,, , •. ..,..:, .. ,.:_.: . ..., „„. ,,,,,...._ „---..- -: „4„:„.....„-c_z„....„. ____ __ ,_,-12,..-,-,_ .......1.,--,-.70-2,---_, : , : : .... s� s ,...„....,......_...„. • __.... ,. ,. . ... I ... J— -- — ApplVe 7 12/8/2022 Actions Requested Adopt a resolution approving site plan/building permit authorization to allow for construction of a 7,920-sq. ft. retail building for Schuler Shoes on Lot 2, Block 1, LB at Orchard Place. Apple. Valley 8 • ITEM: 5.D. ..... :�. Apple COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 8, 2022 Valley SECTION: Regular Agenda Description: Apple Valley Square 7th Addition, Popeyes Restaurant Staff Contact: Department/ Division: Alex Sharpe, Planning and Economic Dev. Spec. Community Development Department Applicant: Project Number: Apple Valley Minnesota Realty, LLC PC22-16-BCSV Applicant Date: 7/20/2022 60 Days: 9/18/2022 120 Days: 11/17/2022 ACTION REQUESTED: 1. Adopt a resolution approving a subdivision by preliminary plat of Lot 2, Block 1, Apple Valley Square 4th Addition, into two lots by Apple Valley Square 7th Addition, subject to conditions. 2. Adopt a resolution approving a variance for the required number of parking stalls from 405 stalls to 340 stalls (65 parking stall variance) for Lot 1, Block 1, Apple Valley Square 7th Addition, subject to conditions. 3. Adopt a resolution approving a conditional use permit for a Class II restaurant with drive-through and a variance to reduce the required separation distance for a Class II restaurant from a residential use from 1,000 ft. to 506 ft. on Lot 2, Block 1, Apple Valley Square 7th Addition, subject to conditions. 4. Adopt a resolution approving a site plan/building permit authorization for a 2,519-sq. ft. Popeyes restaurant on Lot 2, Block 1, Apple Valley Square 7th Addition, subject to conditions. SUMMARY: The City has received an application for subdivision by preliminary plat, required parking stall variance, conditional use permit for a Class II restaurant, variance from a separation distance of a Class II restaurant from a residential use, and a site plan/building permit authorization for a Popeyes restaurant. The site is located in front of the Aldi/Burlington businesses at the northwest corner of Cedar Ave and 153rd St. W. The Planning Commission held the public hearing on October 19, 2022. No comments from the public were received. The Planning Commission had a number of comments, which were addressed by the applicant. On November 2, 2022, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of all items except the site plan/building permit authorization. Chair Kurtz voted nay on the site plan/building permit authorization due to concerns about site traffic. The applicant and City Engineer have continued to work on adjusting the site entrance from 153rd St. to address traffic and stacking. An amended site plan is attached to this report. The applicant has granted the City an extension to the 120-day review period while they completed a requested traffic study. The application requires Council action before January 16, 2023. BACKGROUND: Comprehensive Guiding: The site is guided "C" (Commercial) in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Commercial areas include a wide variety of retail, office and service uses that vary in intensity. The use of this site for a Class-II restaurant is consistent with the property's guiding. Zoning: The site is zoned "RB" (Retail Business) which allows Class II restaurants as a conditional use when no closer than 1,000 ft. from a residential or institutional use. Popeyes is defined as a Class II restaurant, which includes drive-through window service. The site is within 1,000 ft. of a residential use to the south, and as such the applicant has applied for a variance. Other restaurants in the area have applied for and been granted a variance to this code provision. Examples include Chick-fil-A and Pennock Center. Site Plan and Subdivision: The applicant is proposing to subdivide the 6.94-acre property by preliminary plat into two lots. The primary lot (Lot 1), which would include the Aldi and Burlington Coat Factory, would be 6.42 acres and the new lot (Lot 2) for Popeyes is proposed to be 0.52 acres. Primary access to the site would be from a shared drive on Cedar Ave to the north, and from 153rd St. W. No direct access to Cedar Ave is permitted and no new access points are proposed as part of this development. Popeyes is primarily a drive-through window service restaurant and by code does not generate a need for significant parking. City Code requires that parking lots include landscape islands when in excess of 25 parking stalls. The existing lot currently does not meet this provision and is proposing the installation of eight new landscape islands. The landscaping in these does not count towards the landscaping required for the Popeyes building. The installation of these islands is consistent with other recent developments, including the Chase Bank and Pennock Center projects. Separation Distance Variance: When considering a variance, the City must utilize the following to determine practical difficulties. The Planning Commission had the following findings related to the required code provisions. • Special conditions apply to the structures or land in question that are particular to the property and do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district or vicinity in which the land is located: The proposed Class II restaurant use is located within an intensive commercial development along and within a quadrant of a major transportation corridor (abutting Cedar Ave/County Rd 23 and located near the intersection of County Rd 42 and Cedar Ave/County Rd 23). There are commercial uses, as well as another Class II restaurant, between this proposed Class II restaurant and the closest residential structure south of 153rd Street. There are existing Class II restaurants within this major transportation corridor that are located closer to the residential uses than the proposed use will be. • The granting of the proposed variance will not be contrary to the intent of this chapter: The use is not contrary to the chapter: The intent of the separation distance is to minimize negative impacts to neighboring residential uses. The distance of the proposed location of the use does not directly have adverse impact to the residential uses due to the structures, public 4-lane street and ponding between the proposed use and the existing residential use, as well as the overriding impact of the high traffic volume of Cedar Ave/County Rd 23. • The special conditions or circumstances do not result from the actions of the owner/applicant: The location of this site being in Apple Valley's downtown/ring route area in close proximity to established residential neighborhoods(s), which includes a mix of uses, is not caused by the applicant. • The granting of the variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but is necessary to alleviate practical difficulties in complying with the zoning provisions of this Code: There are existing Class II restaurants in this immediate area and in other areas within the County Road 42 and Cedar Ave corridor quadrant that are significantly closer to residential uses than this proposed use is to the nearby residential use. • The variance requested is the minimum variance necessary to alleviate the practical difficulty: The property owner has placed the Class-II restaurant on its property as far away from a residential use as possible. Parking Variance: The applicant has applied for a 65-stall parking variance for the existing Aldi/Burlington lot, which if the subdivision is approved would become Lot 1. The site currently has 405 parking spaces where code requires 397 spaces for the existing tenants and unused area in the Burlington store. The proposed plans reduce the site parking to 340 parking spaces. When considering a variance, the City must utilize the following to determine practical difficulties. The Planning Commission had the following findings related to the required code provisions. • Special conditions apply to the structures or land in question that are particular to the property and do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district or vicinity in which the land is located: The buildings on this site have deeper bays than traditional retail due to the site once being an interior mall. These deeper bays increase the square footage. of the interior space, which is often unused by the tenants, thus resulting in a higher parking requirement than the demand created by the users. • The granting of the proposed variance will not be contrary to the intent of this chapter: The variance, if granted would be consistent with the chapters requirement that parking demands be met on-site. • The special conditions or circumstances do not result from the actions of the owner/applicant: The design of the existing building as an interior mall was not created by the applicant. As stated previously, this results in unused or under-utilized square footage resulting in a higher parking requirement than actual demand. • The granting of the variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but is necessary to alleviate practical difficulties in complying with the zoning provisions of this Code: The practical difficulty of a parking field that exceeds the parking demand necessitates a variance if the proposed use is to be permitted. • The variance requested is the minimum variance necessary to alleviate the practical difficulty: The parking variance is the minimum variance necessary to allow the development. Traffic Study: A traffic study has been completed and found that the proposed use will increase traffic, but not significantly enough to warrant mitigation, or changes to the existing roadway system. Up to 50% of the traffic to this site would already be on adjacent roadways. The City Engineer's memo provides additional information on the study, both of which are attached to this report for reference. Interior traffic is not formally evaluated by the City, but recommendations are often made to better the development. As noted, the City Engineer and the applicant have designed a pedestrian refuge in front of Aldi that channels traffic into the site, preventing backups onto 153rd St. W. and increases safety for pedestrians. The addition of the landscape islands in the existing lot will help channel traffic and reduce speed in the lot. Site Utilities: The City Engineer has provided a more detailed utility analysis in their memo attached. Stormwater treatment is improved from existing conditions with the addition of an underground system and additional green space. The sewer and water utilities will remain private and connect to the public system through the existing lot connections. The applicant has stated they will comply with all suggestions and conditions from the City Engineer's memo. Their response memo is attached to this report. Building Elevations: Since the public hearing, additional improvements to the building elevations have occurred. The materials meet City Code and the Downtown Design Guidelines. Landscape Plan: The site is currently 100% impervious with the exception of the landscaping adjacent to Cedar Ave. Ordinance requires that 2.5% of the Means construction cost of Popeyes is put towards landscaping on the site. The applicant has provided a budget which demonstrates they meet the requirements. A detailed bid list will be required at the time of building permit. Pedestrian Access: The applicant has proposed a sidewalk out to the Cedar Ave trail. This is consistent with nearby developments such as Chase Bank. The Comprehensive Plan encourages pedestrian connectivity wherever possible. The zoning code also requires bike rack installation near the main entrance to facilitate multi-modal transportation. Signage: Signage is not reviewed by the Planning Commission. However, the submission by the applicant notes several wall signs on the same wall. City ordinance allows one sign per wall face. Murals and other non-signage options may not constitute a sign and will require evaluation at the time of a sign permit. Environmental Considerations: The site is currently 100% impervious and does not treat any stormwater on site. The proposed project will include an underground stormwater infiltration basin which is a significant improvement from existing conditions. Additionally, the addition of landscaping on both the newly created lot, and on the existing lot is a benefit for stormwater and urban heat island affects. BUDGET IMPACT: All new lots are subject to park dedication. The existing lot has previously paid park dedication fees, but the newly created lot for Popeyes will be subject to park dedication. This is consistent with nearby developments, including Chase Bank. Park dedication is required due to the demand generated by the restaurant. Based on the City's fee schedule the proposed building would generate the need for an additional 0.0119 acres of parkland in the City. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution Resolution Resolution Resolution Area Map Zoning Map Preliminary Plat Site Plan Plan Set Elevations Landscaping Plan Applicant Letter Applicant Letter Memo Presentation CITY OF APPLE VALLEY RESOLUTION NO. 2022- PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL APPLE VALLEY SQUARE 7TH ADDITION WHEREAS,pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 462.358,the City of Apple Valley adopted, as Chapter 153 of the City Code,regulations to control the subdivision of land within its borders; and WHEREAS,pursuant to Chapter 153 of the City Code,the City Planning Commission held a public hearing on an application for subdivision of land by plat on October 19, 2022; and WHEREAS,the City Planning Commission reviewed the preliminary plat for conformance with the standards of Chapter 153 of the City Code and made a recommendation regarding its approval on November 2, 2022, subject to conditions. NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Apple Valley, Dakota County,Minnesota,that the preliminary plat for the following described plat of land is hereby approved for a one-year period, to wit: APPLE VALLEY SQUARE 7TH ADDITION BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,pursuant to Chapter 153 of the City Code,that said preliminary plat approval is subject to the following conditions,which shall be incorporated into a subdivision agreement to be considered for approval at the time of submission of the request for final plat approval: 1. The plat shall be configured to have two (2) lots and zero (0) outlots. 2. Park dedication requirements are based upon the City's finding that the subdivision will create 1.259 residents/occupants that will generate a need for acres of parkland in accordance with adopted City standards for park services. This required dedication shall be satisfied by a cash-in-lieu of land contribution based on .0119 acres of needed land area at a benchmark land value of$265,000 per acre, which the City reasonably determines that it will need to expend to acquire land elsewhere in order to provide the necessary park services as a result of this subdivision. 3. Dedication on the final plat of a ten-foot (10')wide easement for drainage, utility, street, sidewalk, street lights, and tree plantings along the entire perimeter of lots within the plat wherever abutting public road right-of-ways. 4. Dedication on the final plat of a five-foot(5') wide drainage and utility easement along all common lot lines. 5. Installation of municipal sanitary sewer, water, storm sewer, and street improvements as necessary to serve the plat, constructed in accordance with adopted City standards, including the acquisition of any necessary easements outside the boundaries of the plat which are needed to install connections to said necessary improvements. The Developer shall enter into an agreement with the City for payment of the design of said municipal improvements. 6. Installation of pedestrian improvements in accordance with the City's adopted Trail and Sidewalk Policies, to consist of five-foot (5')wide concrete sidewalks and/or eight-foot (8')wide along bituminous connecting to Cedar Ave. 7. Submission of a final grading plan and lot elevations with erosion control procedures, to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. If the site is one (1) or more acres in size the applicant shall also submit a copy of the of the General Storm Water Permit approval from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency pursuant to Minnesota Rules 7100.1000 - 7100.1100 regarding the State NPDES Permit prior to commencement of grading activity. 8. Construction shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. Weekend construction hours shall be limited to 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. 9. Earthmoving activities shall be limited to the hours of 6:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. 10. The City receives a hold harmless agreement in favor of the City as drafted by the City Attorney and incorporated into the subdivision agreement. 11. A cross parking agreement between Lot 1, and Lot 2, Apple Valley Square 7th Addition, shall be executed in a form acceptable to the City Attorney and a copy provided to the City. The Agreement shall be recorded, along with the final plat, with Dakota County Recorder's Office. Recorded documents shall be provided to the City of Apple Valley prior to issuance of a building permit. 12. A cross access agreement between Lot 1, and Lot 2, Apple Valley Square 7th Addition, shall be executed in a form acceptable to the City Attorney and a copy provided to the City. The Agreement shall be recorded, along with the final plat, with the Dakota County Recorder's Office. Recorded documents shall be provided to the City of Apple Valley prior to issuance of a building permit. 13. The final plat shall be recorded with the County prior to the issuance of a building permit. 14. Subject to all conditions noted in the City Engineer's memo dated October 15, 2022. ADOPTED this 8th day of December, 2022. 2 Clint Hooppaw, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk 3 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY RESOLUTION NO. 2022 - A RESOLUTION APPROVING A 65-STALL REQUIRED PARKING VARIANCE AND ATTACHING CONDITIONS THERETO WHEREAS,pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 462.357 the City of Apple Valley has adopted, as Title XV of the City Code of Ordinances,zoning regulations to control land uses throughout the City; and WHEREAS,pursuant to the City's said regulations, a"variance"is an exception granted by the City Council from the literal provisions of the zoning regulations where practical difficulties exist which do not apply to the area in general; and WHEREAS, an application for a variance was submitted by Apple Valley Minnesota Realty LLC, for property located at 7575 153rd St. W. and to be platted and legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Apple Valley Square 7th Addition; and WHEREAS,the parcel is proposed to be subdivided by preliminary and final plat with a final legal description of Lot 1, Block 1,Apple Valley Square 7th Addition; and WHEREAS, City Code §155.379 sets the required parking stalls for a site based on the use; CAR Apple Valley Square, LLC requests a variance to allow a 65-stall reduction in required parking spaces; and WHEREAS,the Apple Valley Planning Commission reviewed the project at its public meeting on October 19, 2022; and WHEREAS,the Apple Valley Planning Commission recommended approval of the variance at its public meeting on November 2,2022; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Apple Valley, Dakota County, Minnesota,that the City Council finds that the applicant established that the following practical difficulties exist on the property in accordance with the City's zoning regulations: 1. The current parking requirements exceed the demand generated by the current tenant mix. 2. The City encourages redevelopment of existing sites in the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The applicant has completed a parking study that demonstrated the site meets actual parking needs. 4. The newly created lot will meet parking requirements. BE IF FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Apple Valley,Dakota County, Minnesota,that a 65-stall parking variance is hereby approved, subject to all applicable City Codes and standards, and the following conditions: 1. The variance shall be applicable to the property legally identified as Lot 1, Block 1, Apple Valley Square 7th Addition. 2. If the Building Permit is not paid for and issued within one (1)year of the date of approval,the approval shall lapse. 3. The Building Permit shall be applicable to property identified as Lot 2, Block 1, Apple Valley Square 7th Addition. 4. A parking stalls variance is granted to reduce the total stalls required by 65 (from 405 to 340) is approved due to the unusual hardship imposed by the existing site's buildings being designed for an interior mall,which no longer exists. A parking study has been completed to show that parking demand is met the current tenant mix. Should the tenant mix change,new users shall generate a similar overall parking demand. 5. Cross parking agreements between Lot 1, and Lot 2,Apple Valley Square 7th Addition shall be provided to the City in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. These documents shall be recoded with Dakota County. Recoded documents shall be provided to the City of Apple Valley prior to issuance of a building permit. 6. The applicant shall maintain a minimum of 340 parking stalls. 7. Construction shall occur in conformance with the site plan dated November 29, 2022, on file with the City, including parking lot paving and a non-surmountable concrete curb and gutter. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that such issuance is subject to a finding of compliance of the construction plans with the Minnesota State Building Code, as determined by the Apple Valley Building Official, and with the Minnesota State Fire Code, as determined by the Apple Valley Fire Marshal. ADOPTED this 8th day of December,2022. Clint Hooppaw,Mayor 2 ATTEST: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk CERTIFICATE I, Pamela Gackstetter, City Clerk, hereby certify that the above resolution is a true and correct copy of a resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Apple Valley, Dakota County, Minnesota, on the day of , 20 . Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk 3 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE TO OPERATE A CLASS II RESTAURANT IN AN"RB"(RETAIL BUSINESS)ZONE AND ATTACHING CONDITIONS THERETO WHEREAS,pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 462.357 the City of Apple Valley has adopted, as Title XV of the City Code of Ordinances, zoning regulations to control land uses throughout the City; and WHEREAS, said regulations provide that a Class II Restaurant as regulated in Section 155.157 (H) of the City Code may be allowed within the confines of a "RB"(Retail Business) zoning district and in accordance with specific performance standards, as a conditional use, provided the restaurant is located at least 1,000 ft. from residential and institutional land uses; and WHEREAS, approval of a Conditional Use Permit for a Popeyes, a Class II Restaurant with drive-through window service has been requested by Apple Valley Minnesota Realty,LLC on property legally described as Lot 2, Block 1,Apple Valley Square 7th Addition; and WHEREAS, approval of a variance to the 1,000 ft. separation distance between a Class II Restaurant with drive-through window service and a residential or institutional use has also been requested by Apple Valley Minnesota Realty, LLC; and WHEREAS,review of such Conditional Use Permit request to determine its conformance with the applicable regulations and performance standards has occurred at a public hearing held on- October 19,2022; and WHEREAS, the Apple Valley Planning Commission recommended approval of such Conditional Use Permit subject to certain conditions on November 2, 2022. NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Apple Valley, Dakota County,Minnesota,that a Conditional Use Permit for a Class II Restaurant within a"RB" (Retail Business)zone be approved subject to compliance with all applicable City codes and standards, and the following conditions: 1. Construction shall occur in conformance with the site plan dated October 24, 2022. 2. All signage associated with the drive-through window service shall adhere to Section 154.04 (J)(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)by separate review and approval. 3. Site uses shall comply with parking requirements. Potential uses may be limited by overall site parking requirements. 4. Cross access agreements between Lot 1, and Lot 2, Apple Valley Square 7th Addition shall be provided to the City in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. These documents shall be recoded with Dakota County. Recoded documents shall be provided to the City of Apple Valley prior to issuance of a building permit. 5. If the use allowed by the Conditional Use Permit is not completed or utilized within one (1)year of the date of approval, the permit shall become null and void. 6. The Conditional Use Permit may be revoked for cause if the terms of(1) through (5) preceding are not adhered to. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of Apple Valley that a variance to allow a Class II restaurant to be located less than 1,000 feet from an institutional or residential use is granted,based on the following findings: 1. The proposed Class-II restaurant use is located within an intensive commercial development along and within a quadrant of a major transportation corridor(abutting Cedar Ave/County Rd 23 and located near the intersection of County Rd 42 and Cedar Ave/County Rd 23). There are commercial uses, as well as another Class-II restaurant, between this proposed Class-II restaurant and the closest residential structure south of 153rd Street. There are existing Class-II restaurants within this major transportation corridor that are located closer to the residential uses than the proposed use will be. 2. A stormwater ponding area buffers the residential from 153rd St. W and the proposed use. 3. The intent of the separation distance is to minimize negative impacts to neighboring residential uses. The distance of the proposed location of the use does not directly have adverse impact to the residential uses due to the structures,public 4-lane street and ponding between the proposed use and the existing residential use, as well as the overriding impact of the high traffic volume of Cedar Ave/County Rd 23. 4. The special conditions or circumstances do not result from the actions of the owner/applicant: The location of this site being in Apple Valley's downtown/ring route area in close proximity to established residential neighborhoods(s),which includes a mix of uses, is not caused by the applicant. 5. The property owner has placed the Class-II restaurant on its property as far away from a residential use as possible. ADOPTED this 8th day of December, 2022. 2 Clint Hooppaw, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk CERTIFICATE I, Pamela Gackstetter, Apple Valley City Clerk, hereby certify that the forgoing is a true and correct copy of a resolution adopted by the City Council on December 8, 2022, the original of which is in my possession, dated this day of , 2022. Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk 3 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT FOR APPLE VALLEY MINNESOTA REALTY, LLC TO CONSTRUCT A POPEYES RESTAURANT AND ATTACHING CONDITIONS THERETO WHEREAS,pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 462.357 the City of Apple Valley has adopted, as Title XV of the City Code of Ordinances, zoning regulations to control land uses throughout the City; and WHEREAS, said regulations provide that issuance of a building permit for commercial, industrial, and multiple residential uses require the specific review and approval of development plans by the Apple Valley Planning Commission and City Council; and WHEREAS, the project is located on Lot 2, Block 1, Apple Valley Square 7th; and WHEREAS, approval of such a building permit issuance has been requested for the above referenced project; and WHEREAS,the Apple Valley Planning Commission has reviewed the development plans and made a recommendation as to their approval at a public meeting held on November 2, 2022. NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Apple Valley, Dakota County,Minnesota,that the issuance of a building permit for a 2,519 sq. ft. restaurant with drive-through for Popeyes is hereby authorized, subject to all applicable City Codes and standards, and the following conditions: 1. Construction shall occur in conformance with the site plan dated October 24, 2022, on file with the City, including parking lot paving and a non-surmountable concrete curb and gutter. 2. Construction shall occur in conformance with the landscape plan dated October 24, 2022, on file with the City, (including sodded/seeded public boulevard area up to each street curbline); subject to submission of a detailed landscape planting price list for verification of the City's 2.5% landscaping requirement at the time of building permit application. 3. Construction shall occur in conformance with the utility plan dated September 20, 2022, on file with the City. 4. Construction shall occur in conformance with the elevation plan dated October 21, 2022, on file with the City. 5. Landscaping shall be installed in conformance with the landscape plan dated October 24, 2022, subject to revisions as required by the City's Natural Resource Coordinator's memo dated October 27, 2022. 6. A bike rack shall be installed in close proximity to the primary entrance which does not impede pedestrian flow of the proposed sidewalks. 7. Subject to all conditions noted in the City Engineer's memo November 29, 2022. 8. The property owner shall execute a maintenance agreement or other suitable agreement to be filed with the deed that ensures the perpetual maintenance of all onsite stormwater areas. 9. Trash enclosures shall be screened in conformance with City Code. 10. All necessary mechanical protrusions visible to the exterior shall be screened or handled in accordance with Section 155.346 (3) (a) (b) of the city code. 11. Issuance of a Building Permit and a final certificate of occupancy is contingent upon the project being constructed in conformance with all the preceding conditions as well as all applicable performance standards of the current zoning regulations. In the event that a certificate of occupancy is requested prior to completion of all required site improvements, a suitable financial guarantee in the amount of 125% of the estimated cost of the unfinished improvements shall be required along with an agreement authorizing the City or its agents to enter the premises and complete the required improvements if they are not completed by a reasonably stipulated deadline, with the cost of such City completion to be charged against the financial guarantee. 12. A separate application and signage plan in conformance with the sign regulations must be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the erection of any signs. 13. Construction and earthmoving activities shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. Weekend construction hours shall be limited to the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Construction shall not be performed on federal holidays. 14. The ongoing use and occupancy of the premises is predicated on the ongoing maintenance of the structure and all required site improvements as listed in the preceding. No alteration, removal, or change to the preceding building plans or required site improvements shall occur without the express authorization of the City. Site improvements which have deteriorated due to age or wear shall be repaired or replaced in a timely fashion. 15. Notwithstanding Chapter 153 of the Apple Valley Code of Ordinances, a permit may be issued prior to the platting of the land provided that the land must be platted prior to occupancy. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that such issuance is subject to a finding of compliance of the construction plans with the Minnesota State Building Code, as determined by the Apple Valley 2 Building Official, and with the Minnesota State Uniform Fire Code, as determined by the Apple Valley Fire Marshal. ADOPTED this 8th day of December, 2022. Clint Hooppaw,Mayor ATTEST: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk 3 i FRONTAGE ° r !� r -- r m _ - 31 R - - _ - 150�H�STiW f 17 r, �,• rf f . E tw P! e° L J a4. r P 1 w P w, Q war Y 1_.1il ! al �cal_ s+ i{°r1151STONW _ ,yam = z� ere*" 1 .r I v rr tp e ' t ,•tS ITE \ F F•\ t Y -i,et'' 't# : _ r ti A. `''°tea tt1., > r r r r 'c I k r"C r9 r. ♦ '" r tr If, . r - -•,..�� '_ F!Plr . tFrrC. -��• .I T.a.an. _a , mto 0 = I Iii \ 11, 7 - V f! tp r r In.r- 4r e rrr , ` J Y UO - r Fr ! ` ie 1 , . ': F 4r L '(r - . . — - 153RD ST W h � n "Y.' � _. . jlFP1f z IL • {ems r soil %op la On III _ p ,,,,. .00 _ _ ._ • 14 ' ; C ^ 5� ff WHITNEY DR - T tr q ''".a� r f B rpfy�{r.�e y� If P - - r lio. �r r r f r r t_;::: a , J I _ Imo.t "' ' \. t-_ L_.. ! N Apple Valley Square V =' . 7th Addition 11�,/. -Al e.�i1 +�,�44=' r1 F1i i,i I �raff. :fig 'e`—I iril -.r'u,;t�. ' r n Proposed Popeyes Location � ' '�H� ♦```~�''; '.. ... Lrl v r MINIj pill"tillre 1,lir,I1111 L o.okt,�'jl r___RB mAilliC I FRONTAGE RD \ 150TH ST W 150TH ST W J FI a w z a a PD-244 W w w _1w 0 a _ 151ST ST W w — I a _ I a 0 RB 0 SITE PD-244 w a et 0 1 w U z J U i O 153RD ST W z zl w a 0 ...., ,..... ..,".. 0 \01 ...._ .0_ =I. ,L__,, ,.,_A, ot WOO IOW' -{yin all* 1%* 4111117 41%. WHITNEY DR - RB - M- M-7C PD- 8C PD-507 1_ ,. _ Apple Valley Square N ,4f n' . r. 7th Addition -Age` `ra.zieeiipm�,Gt�.it�}Cfi1C� r Zoned "RB" Retail Business t '"i' `IA !�rV's4 ,! � Lei Proposed Popeyes Location ft 1IA-6 M I ■1L ,6,;H: APPLE VALLEY SQUARE 7TH ADDITION EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (per Title No. 51976) 0- Lot 2, Block 1, Apple Valley Square 4th Addition, Dakota County, Minnesota. Together with any easements as set forth in that certain Declaration, dated October 1, 1982, recorded November 12, 1982 as Document No. 611320; as 7 amended by First Amendment to Declaration dated June 11, 1986, recorded June 30, 1986 as Document No. 732565 in the Office of the County Recorder in and for Dakota County, Minnesota. OWNERS/ DEVELOPERS: SURVEYOR: Apple Valley Minnesota Realty LLC ISG 7300 147th Street West 7900 International Drive Suite 402 Suite 550 7 r— r—/ I / 1 / / r ' / Apple Valley, MN 55124 Minneapolis, MN 55425 I A- /--�i - I // I / / /-- Y 952-222-3939 952-426-0699 F\ AREA TABLE: ° Existing: Lot 2, Block 1 = 302,473 sq. ft. -6.94 acres /,i/-- / / �' r-1- r- - Lr--�T�' / /' r-- r--• / �7--/7//1// `t/ // / f I , f- i I / // // // L./ xl� /`1/ 1— L_/ / / / /-l/_//_-, / / / . // L �i ° • N Proposed New Lot: o o Lot 1, Block 1 = 279,783 sq. ft. -6.42 acres = Lot 2, Block 1 = 22,690 sq. ft. -0.52 acres EA T 387.92 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT tn O j -r o - 43.00 -VI i II \I 179.50 r — 208.42 �. �(-, �j I W 1 / C✓ p I I _ — — 32592 �� — --Ir EXISTING PROPERTY: 0 .p I 29, �+,� Oi�� ZONED: RB Retail Business �� ci (Per Cityof Apple Valleywebsite)ii _ $ 295.00 I \II / pp j '-Common Wall / T h �/' - j 40) A r; Building Setbacks - - _ _ 4_ r2 T• (71 Front= 50 feet - - % • I ////�// ] h� Side = 15 feet 0 7 r — r -• / r — I / / / r- — 1 / % N \ •e e•.i�i�i�i:i i i i i i i•- L 1 \' el f-�f-�i f i / �I / / f v CD o wN ........ I N- Rear= 15 feet \ C / /�l/ / t_— — /�l/_— /-— — / y 1 O °o° POPEQES I l 1 / j I I / o 2,347 FT I / Street = 30 feet / I ' --; FFE=954.85 •••• , -\ 1` ` OC / / M/ / 'I r /- — /' -T-' / / VCi V 0•••�•�•0•0:i��of- f I \l J •.,/ ,� I / �� / �/ �l �,�f- �� / / /-� % i� 1 q 71 OI FronParkfng15feetcks L' EAST / Li xL-//`7/ 1 � _ r / / / % � kl r-, I �� ♦ � i I 132.00 / t I DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT t-' m / / zirl— - - - �— — +r _ Side = 5feet °2 % I `� WEST 208.42 ,�'v ,I' / i CO -' ^�� Rear= 5 feet I. I I I i l / I Kr irdl, - � / •`k I r' ,� �,lY, 1 i Street = 20 feet ---irt t-t- /V \„ 7//J, / I I I '�� 9 , \ \• BENCHMARK: I II I Sin I j I _ 1 1 I I--I--I I :(0w..:41 `� y' 1 / _ � 4 L y\ Onsite benchmark is top nut of hydrant located on the west side of the parking lot, / TRAIL, DRAINAGE / cc) 1 r AND UTILITY �'`� I y \;' 37.5' south and 40.5' east of the sw planter box corner. N -1' v I EASEMENT PER I I w l.-\ Elev=955.12 (NAVD88). �_ o /'ffs / I• I I DOCUMENT NO.3281486 I �f I c / 1 kl I I l l rJ _� o % /� / 5 r j I I _ — — _ — _ — J I �'� l ; `\ \y, Offsite benchmark is MnDOT monument VALLEY, Elev=947.895 (NAVD88). (Group Hea/fh Plan/ncJ / -r- , ; I I I 1 — _ _ _ — — — — �� I \---..—I / I /^I 1- I L-+1_ — _ ;< J1.Al� / I I '� FLOOD ZONE: r / I / I I / I I I pRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT — _ I 1 tom\ \ po -�i_ �/ /\ / i I I � — « _— — _ — _ — — _ — — I The flood zone classification/limits depicted hereon, if any, are subject to map scale O , /`1/ / k / 1 I L — — —h — — I l . \ I �;.' uncertainty. The surveyed property shown on this survey map is in Flood Zone X, c w I,i I I / �- / JAI l according to Flood Insurance Rate Map Community Panel No. 27037CO201E, w I `� ; published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, effective date w W ( December 2, 2011. r � �I M ��/� / I — — — — — — N89°53'44"Er ��, ! //, f H 1 J I mow: — _ 75.00 ter; I EAST z ?i j - B 20 T 5°. O I i 500 �� jBLOCK I �1 r \ `A� VICINITY MAP �� x/ z j �� i I-\ (NOT TO SCALE) 1 / I \ 0 `/ / — i J C.SA.H. NO. 42 o ° n / — '33 ❑- I 1 \I mil = / / I � I ,I _ — << — — < I SITE a /� 0 5)0 / - -- -r - ,' o N I— /1 g / / _ — �_ — EAST 93/ 1 1.53Rn ST � , N S082233'E < c "_'1 / . Q I N C) N 100.57 m II v� — °° D% / 1� r-i Utility Easement CV il — — — —LiJ z� �� I �-EAST 950.00�J perp/at _ �_ 2 \/ ui = I e3 4:)1 -'I / ,--Utility Easement Vacated 30�0 IJ I_ - 1---i � � — \I � 7 �I282. 3— r �.. 0 I 'Cl-� ,i- . ° Gy. - I - y N N' -�� - 'I �• Utility Eas ment oVI cl•I i `i i llt Ec{SL'll7e/d e/ lat v!� _ f EAST 306/00 Utility NOI°59I48' I 1 per 21.58 _ __ yy 1 _ 4'14_ 132.�2 — — — — l Easement — — — J / 34.64 I I I ` c' I co ti _ N824>_ W �— er oc._ I — — c;it j � T fi — I I I 1 _ SEC. 33, TWP. 115, RGE. 20 I0 C� 0 0 o L) I -- - ' ---UTL u L 1„ / o City of Apple Valley, Dakota County, MN. -�'-- I' I —————UTL TL UTL UTL - -- UTL- /UTL �__ - 0 0 50 100 J �_—UTL ��'uZ. �E UE --_'✓SQI� UE UE - --- l3E '�1�i�:— v� 1 UE O --- IE • _- UE0-�" `-SJ e 0 es.00 UE — —�� APCNR Z Scale: In Feet //---/--,r\ //-1 )f-// / `) / !-�//-- / /-- L,/ / / / LEGEND ® INDICATES MAG NAIL SET OR WILL BE SET IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN STATUTES SECTION 505.021, SUBD. 10 (CityofApple Valley] A DENOTES RESTRICTED ACCESS PER r r- '- / -T- // '1 / PLAT OF APPLE VALLEY SQUARE 4TH // / // // / / // 1 , ADDITION AND THE DAKOTA COUNTY 1/--'/_i / / / .. ..,/ L/ CONTIGUOUS PLAT ORDINANCE I 1 / BEARING NOTE: For the purposes of this plat the east line of Lot 2, Block 1,APPLE I VALLEY SQUARE 4TH ADDITION, Dakota County, Minnesota is ISG assumed to bear S00°06'16"E. I I 1 1 4` _ rn 1 r o 1114 � . "' � o I �i 9 o Z I�-20--I "' . �,,0 W (4: I � 0 STRIPING PER MN a a .�.�„ j I — I� MUTCD STANDARDS, TYP. a m U ok [I)10 (,)a _. � i' ' LaTh i ip IX o� • POPEYES •• 1 ® __} III_ u V • ' •� L.,-1 - _ a • �IIh °� • 2 •519 SQ. FT. • SCALE IN FEETco —T_ �� FFE = 954.85 • • < ❑ i SINi A. 02•2•2•2•2•14 O 0 - - o �o a I I y ��1 I 1 1 • g--� 0 0 a k) I I 0 / ____T______ IX o 0 0 oM L 1 O ►.: ❑ \~i I IML F //‘ .4— PROPOSED LOT LINE, TYP. / # - I Q 0 EXISTING '� 9 1 E m NOTE:o � 1 . U Z BURLINGTON I U� FI I 1 11 THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND ❑ J - - a UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES >m COAT FACTORY IA- 10' NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN FFE = 954.00' i 1 1 0� ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT INIX �� I—► 1 — — _ MISINTERPRETATION. 1 — /0 1'WIDE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT PATCH TO II I a Q ALLOW FOR CURB ISLAND CONSTRUCTION, / I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR '` (MATCH EXISTING SECTION) P or 1 - REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT / , SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED a A - �t - PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE _--1-_ - - ' c) � El �1 _ — — — STATE OF MINNESOTA.RYAN J. ANDERSON 2 � �U I I a L4 ) < ii. ) B618 CURB&GUTTER, TYP. 1 � r J — ° (REFER TO DETAILS) 1 -'� —1'WIDE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT PATCH — [� DATE 11/29/2022 Luc. No. 55938 W � ��'. (MATCH EXISTING SECTION) _ k O OMT E OETY RUP I X / Q� INC.THIS ADNDCU MAYEN NOT IS BETH USEDPR ,PC OPIEDR OF OF &DU SPGLICAOTE,D II�, I I ^ WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. a❑ I I I I I I I o PAVEMENT LEGEND - - - - _1 I 1 1 I 1 1 PROJECT o SYMBOL DESCRIPTION U'D ) 7/ ) o 1 O B618 CURB &GUTTER, TYP. B618 CURB&GUTTER,TYP. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT APPLE VALLEY I , (REFER TO DETAILS) (REFER TO DETAILS) 0 ° ° / 1—• 1 C SQUARE 7TH 0 1'WIDE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT PATCH r _ 9 1 (MATCH EXISTING SECTION) CONCRETE PAVEMENT® 1 1 ADDITION I N �111 I RESTRIPE ALL DISTURBED SITE SUMMARY II — '/ - - - - - 11 / — — — PARKIN T T AINT. �/�it ___ / O G S ALLS WI H 4 P CO-�- L 15-t � 1 1 t MATCH EXISTING STRIPING PROJECT 7575 153RD STREET WEST APPLE VALLEY MINNESOTA 0 i I ADDRESS/LOCATION: APPLE VALLEY,MINNESOTA 55124Z I I EXISTING ALDIN CONFIGURATION, TYP. REVISION SCHEDULE I -\ ° ° FFE : 954.22 I i DATE DESCRIPTION BY 0 I k>Utility Easement •4 ZONING: RB,RETAIL BUSINESS I 1 per plat0 V ,m iI 1 F INSET A 9_r-- - ,_ -+ 1 ,,- PARKING CALCULATIONS C�DO NOT ENTER ��-UtilityEasement Vacated ® ' 9SIGN per Doc.No.3128105 --- -- - - 1 ` r l- -t LAND USE CLASSIFICATION(LOT 2) RETAIL STORE(S)IV ® PARKING SPACES REQUIRED 1 SPACE PER 150 SF UP TO 20,000 SF 0 0— / / // //// �i 10�� - - -i VI Ii 0 - (155.379 0-RETAIL STORE) THEN 1 SPACE PER 200 SF U - -�- _ � , GROSS FLOOR ACTUAL RETAIL AREA +� tility Easement per plat [IA•19w Utility Easement ■_ AREA SF [SF] PROJECT NO. 16-19870 t —Li— — — — — — _ � Utility Easement _ t � ° , perplaf 4" DOUBLE YELLOW [ ] I O O — — _ _ _ _ - O per Doc.No. � —► PAINT ALDI - 12,453 FILE NAME 19870 C3 SITE 0 - _ - - - - - - - - ( - - - i I ■ DRAWN BY LFO T T T BURLINGTON 55,162 50,148 I I I DESIGNED BY LFO/RJA i BURLINGTON UNUSED FUTURE 11,126 10,115 1 I 1 - - F — 4_ — _ — I1 ^ 0 I 1 REVIEWED BY RJA i' © f- -{ - I © © � ■ APPLE VALLEY SQUARE(TOTAL) 72,716 ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 07/18/2022 >m I `�< SIGN DO OT ENTER • ' REQUIRED PARKING SPACES + CLIENT PROJECT NO. IX - O CO 0 0 � 0 04! ❑ I (20,0001150) [(72,716-20,000)/200]_ 0 _I - _=1 - LAND USE CLASSIFICATION(LOT 1) CLASS II RESTAURANT TITLE - - - J • i' PARKING SPACES REQUIRED �j �, * 4 /CC �0, 0 TUBULAR 42" DELINIATORS ALONG • (155.379 P 2) 1 SPACE PER 3 SEATS PAVEMENT MARKINGS EVERY 5 24 TOTAL SEATS/3= ON CENTER. ADHERE TO PAVEMENT PARKING SPACES REQUIRED 8 SITE PLAN 2 INSET A PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS J 153RD STREET SITE TOTALS W REQUIRED PROVIDED N&-)- IX 80 FOOT R/W A \ LOT 1 8 18 N CL W LOT 2 397 322 SHEET o TOTAL 405 340c 3 _ 1 O I 2, d I I I 1 1 1 1 1 APPLE VALLEY SQUARE 7TH ADDITION COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT 0 V p APPLE VALLEY MINNESOTA SITE PLAN REVIEW ISG PROJECT # 16-19870 ce CO 4 x SHEET INDEX Z g : :�`, F - - City0 C010 TITLE O LEGEND - . _ - -- - - f -. �.. .:nT--, E- . C -1,_-. , „,.. y,. I C0-20 SITE DETAILS0 '_' . 01 ' ,,� . a ` �•�;..,.=-r I�� V. f CO-21 SITE DETAILS •Y ' Y App1e \Ia11ey, MinnesotaEXISTING -a �t � � �"I � �� CO 22 STORMTECH DETAILS IX— — CITY LIMITS �► • - _ _ �).. a "1 ;ti. E-. : ..�,_ ; f ' I �V .r- ., ti ' ' °-�} 1 • '� 11 or¢ I — CO-23 STORMTECH DETAILS • • - , ` `` '. ""• CO-30 PRELIMINARY PLAT — +'' - fry" „ �` 3' -, i i , r -� , 6 ►'•.i,•, , . SECTION LINE a • + L k�.- ;, O 'r h � ~` C1-10 GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN / ' V t.. f - Ek iI.!,til ; C2-10 EXISTING SITE AND REMOVAL PLAN IML QUARTER SECTION LINE - . ,ram=� , ,,�� . e; t•,::: r • I .f,: j ,.,. ' , RIGHT OF WAY LINE ,r:-r ' .: ,s '� r.;�` �. ' 4.- ,,. .,;' . ...-,--1... �` �. • C3-10 SITE PLAN • I i.� + , .; �_ �.•;' t _.,•r !l p • _• ,_,t I 'A ,r= -te : Frt 4 C3-20 UTILITY PLAN F PROPERTY/LOTLINE _ , , S ,� - + 'i r` -.. , . 't d M � I • -�'r�r ' •, : 4 h•-n.4_• F ,: „ ;; ,„ �, !. C5-10 LANDSCAPE PLAN EASEMENT LINE t - r��s �� 0. �$ 0 0 o ACCESS CONTROL w"_ -'- .. _ , . . � i ! N =''- = - ' "` . - NOTE: f- �� i :.. , '; � tadh ' � tea rr Al: , . Z "4J ,- HE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND - — w— — WATER EDGE = UPON COLOR COPIES IF THIS TEXT DOES �— ; 150TH STREET W — — — WET — — WETLAND BOUNDARY ., ,. _, 0 �, : (y NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN >m z , 1 �,. PROJECT LOCATION 00 `. L 3 31� ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN WETLAND/MARSH " I:e 67 i�; 1 `' MISINTERPRETATION- -x x x x FENCE LINE .? �=��. t .m.. i1!� �`t ��. u�� '' ` tP >. 1 * s _y n yac s �3 «,,a,.;—i I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR — — » — CULVERT e REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT - — » — — STORM SEWER r ' ' ` , ,_., .? '" i' b.r:.,.•-'4 w -'. .t' 4.''. .F '' - -:- � ,.- t >E I r !�I� + ' " o SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ., „.- M -,�; - , 153RD STREET W . •-,, f . . `= ' �, • �_' ;. - �-•+•r, �, �i� i � �° � PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE — — > — — SANITARY SEWER '1:. ', "� .- ...' r„ " ti " :? "�.h i- 1. �j 4 t.*'•�- ' .i a, -%),: STATE OF MINNESOTA. • "I' RYAN J. ANDERSON — — II> — — SANITARY SEWER FORCEMAIN r _ - — l _ {- . " f d , '�e 2 _________ — — I — — WATER , .-. . . ¢ ' Jo-Yr'! :1 L z;■ a . V� .hi' �: - - • 1 '' - - ,�,.,r. }� - -v -.�` a,..,, `,_ I ,, 7 - 1 LD` =�- AI i ..;,:b.,......;:, �« f` 111iJf — — G — — GAS - - •' r` ili,,.,, �, i „ { $ --. 4". q_.,,. -- _*,.. .° j �. -. I . 01•• 00 u►n +ix DATE 09/20/2022 uc. NO. 55938 UNI — — OE — — OVERHEAD ELECTRIC ., -5 .� 1 �. . - .:• r. ;n - -_ - E. '' g r a..�p, �,. " ' P x� 1- ,, - ti. r S - .1.. ' ., THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, :, rr 4 y - — UE — UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC I:e -,.,. ;v � A -. . �A .., _ - : W _ i- . t -1 y t.r ,.,„,-I. - - INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED ► ' WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. a - uT UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE ,L r I >i rl i — ,- — — UTV — — UNDERGROUND TV r�.s, x : , •_ " . „. - $! o -- s:, .Uri. ,; ', ° ; w N PROJECT — — OHL — — OVERHEAD UTILITY `' ., ; R Z r ; a :, c� — — UTL — — UNDERGROUND UTILITY .. _ O — — Feo — — UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC W E APPLE VALLEY 990 CONTOUR(MAJOR) , d ii ; PROJECT GENERAL NOTES �+ 989 CONTOUR(MINOR) .F 1 �, SQUARE 7TH 0 a. .i 4'4'. ' 1 S 1. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE CONTRACT 6. ALL MANUFACTURED ARTICLES, MATERIALS AND 111111 DECIDUOUS TREE DOCUMENTS, WHICH INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO, EQUIPMENT SHALL BE APPLIED, INSTALLED, CONNECTED, CONIFEROUS TREE LOCATION MAP THE OWNER CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT, THE PROJECT ERECTED, CLEANED AND CONDITIONED ACCORDING TO ADDITION MANUAL (WHICH INCLUDES GENERAL SUPPLEMENTARY MANUFACTURERS' INSTRUCTIONS. IN CASE OFCe TREE LINE _SCALE IN FEET CONDITIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS), DRAWINGS OF ALL DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN MANUFACTURERS' DISCIPLINES AND ALL ADDENDA, MODIFICATIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS AND THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, NOTIFY F O MANHOLE/STRUCTURE 0 1000 2000 CLARIFICATIONS ISSUED BY THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER. ARCHITECT/ENGINEER BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE COI I CATCH BASIN 2. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS SHALL BE ISSUED TO ALL WORK. ABBREVIATIONS: APPLE VALLEY MINNESOTA -6- AC ACRE CMP CORRUGATED METAL PIPE FDN FOUNDATION HORIZ HORIZONTAL MAX MAXIMUM PSI POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH SY SQUARE YARD SUBCONTRACTORS BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IN 7. ALL DISSIMILAR METALS SHALL BE EFFECTIVELY ISOLATEDZ HYDRANT COMPLETE SETS IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE THE FULL EXTENT FROM EACH OTHER TO AVOID GALVANIC CORROSION" REVISION SCHEDULE ADA AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT CO CLEANOUT FES FLARED END SECTION HR HOUR MB MAIL BOX PVC POLYVINYL CHLORIDE T/C TOP OF CURB AND COMPLETE COORDINATION OF ALL WORK. O N VALVE ADD ADDENDUM CONC CONCRETE FFE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION HWL HIGH WATER LEVEL MECH MECHANICAL PVMT PAVEMENT TEL TELEPHONE 8. THE LOCATION AND TYPE OF ALL INPLACE UTILITIES DATE DESCRIPTION BY ® CURB STOP AFF ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR CONST CONSTRUCTION FPM FEET PER MINUTE HWY HIGHWAY MH MANHOLE QTY QUANTITY TEMP TEMPORARY 3. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE FOR GENERAL INFORMATION AGG AGGREGATE CONT CONTINUOUS FPS FEET PER SECOND HYD HYDRANT MIN MINIMUM R RIM THRU THROUGH DIMENSIONS. NOTIFY ARCHITECT/ENGINEER OF ANY ONLY AND ARE ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST0 0 POWER POLE APPROX APPROXIMATE CY CUBIC YARD FT FOOT,FEET I INVERT MISC MISCELLANEOUS RAD RADIUS TNFH TOP NUT OF FIRE HYDRANT DISCREPANCIES OR CONDITIONS REQUIRING INFORMATION OF THE KNOWLEDGE OF I &S GROUP, INC. (ISG). NO ARCH ARCHITECT,ARCHITECTURAL C&G CURB AND GUTTER FTG FOOTING ID INSIDE DIAMETER NO NUMBER RCP REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE TRANS TRANSFORMER OR CLARIFICATION BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. WARRANTY OR GUARANTEE IS IMPLIED. THE CONTRACTOR Ct E UTILITY PEDESTAL/CABINET BFE BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION DEMO DEMOLITION GA GAUGE IN INCH NTS NOT TO SCALE RD ROOF DRAIN TV TELEVISION 4. FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. SHALL VERIFY THE SIZES, LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF BIT BITUMINOUS DIA DIAMETER GAL GALLON INV INVERT NWL NORMAL WATER LEVEL REBAR REINFORCING BAR T/W TOP OF WALL NOTIFY ARCHITECT/ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR ALL INPLACE UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. O PROPOSED CAD COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN DIM DIMENSION GALV GALVANIZED IP IRON PIPE OC ON CENTER REM REMOVE TYP TYPICAL CONDITIONS REQUIRING INFORMATION OR CLARIFICATION CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY ENGINEER OF CB CATCH BASIN DS DOWNSPOUT GC GENERAL CONTRACTOR IPS IRON PIPE SIZE OCEW ON CENTER EACH WAY ROW RIGHT OF WAY UTILITY,UNDERGROUND BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM PLAN. LOT LINE CFS CUBIC FEET PER SECOND EA EACH GFE GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION J-BOX JUNCTION BOX OH OVERHEAD R/W RIGHT OF WAY UT TELEPHONE 9. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO CONTACT"GOPHER STATE ONE Um5. DETAILS SHOWN ARE INTENDED TO BE INDICATIVE OF THE — — RIGHT OF WAY VCP VITRIFIED CLAY PIPE CALL" FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, MINIMUM 2 BUSINESS DAYS- CF CUBIC FOOT ELEC ELECTRICAL GL GUTTER LINE JT JOINT OHD OVERHEAD DOOR SAN SANITARY PROFILES AND TYPE OF DETAILING REQUIRED W/O WITHOUT PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION /CONSTRUCTION CI CAST IRON ELEV ELEVATION GPM GALLONS PER MINUTE LF LINEAR FEET OZ OUNCE SCH SCHEDULE THROUGHOUT THE WORK. DETAILS NOT SHOWN ARE PROJECT NO" 16-19870 EASEMENT CIP CAST IRON PIPE EOF EMERGENCY OVERFLOW GV GATE VALVE LIN LINEAR PED PEDESTAL,PEDESTRIAN SF SQUARE FOOT W/ WITH SIMILAR IN CHARACTER TO DETAILS SHOWN. WHERE (1-800-252-1166). O CIPC CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE EQ EQUAL HDPE HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE LPS LOW PRESSURE STEAM PERF PERFORATED SPEC SPECIFICATION YD YARD SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS, DETAILS OR DESIGN INTENT FILE NAME 19870 CO TITLE CULVERT CJ CONTROL JOINT EX EXISTING HD HEAVY DUTY LS LUMP SUM PL PROPERTY LINE SQ SQUARE YR YEAR CANNOT BE DETERMINED, NOTIFY ARCHITECT/ENGINEER DRAWN BY LFO STORM SEWER CL CENTERLINE FDC FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION HH HANDHOLE LSO LOWEST STRUCTURAL OPENING PP POLYPROPYLENE STA STATION BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. DESIGNED BY LFO/RJA Z STORM SEWER(PIPE WIDTH) REVIEWED BY RJA SANITARY SEWER PROJECT IN DEX : ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 07/18/2022 >m SANITARY SEWER(PIPE WIDTH) CLIENT PROJECT NO. IX WATER Q : SPECIFICATIONS REFERENCE TITLE G OWNER: PROJECT MANAGING OFFICE• GAS ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CITY OF APPLE B M. ELEVATION = 955.12 Z OE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC ADDRESS / LOCATION: ■VALLEY REQUIREMENTS AND MnDOT STANDARD APPLE VALLEY MINNESOTA s G SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION, 2020 EDITION, AND THE TOP NUT OF FIRE HYDRANT. LOCATED UE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR SANITARY SEWER, STORM APPROXIMATELY 58' NORTH AND 49' EAST TITLE UTV UNDERGROUND TV REALTY LLC S33 / TWP 115 / R20 DRAIN AND WATERMAIN AS PROPOSED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS FROM BURLINGTON MAIN ENTRY ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA 2018, UNLESS DIRECTED 2 1015 CONTOUR 7300 147TH STREET WEST 7575 153RD STREET WEST OTHERWISE. BLOOMINGTON OFFICE Q MANHOLE (STORM, SANITARY) APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA 55124 7900 INTERNATIONAL DRIVE PROJECT DATUM loll Lo CATCH BASIN P H: (952) 222-3939 APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA SUITE 550 HORIZONTAL COORDINATES HAVE BEEN REFERENCED TO THE N MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55425 NORTH AMERICAN DATUM OF 1983 (NAD83), 1996 ADJUSTMENT oHYDRANT PHONE: 952.426.0699 (NAD83(1996))ON THE DAKOTA COUNTY COORDINATE SYSTEM, SHEET a N H VALVE IN U.S. SURVEY FEET. TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY w ELEVATIONS HAVE BEEN REFERENCED TO THE NORTH o PROJECT MANAGER: RYAN ANDERSON AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD 88). THIS PROJECT'S TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY CONSISTS 0_ O RTK GPS METHODS WERE USED TO ESTABLISH HORIZONTAL OF DATA COLLECTED IN OCTOBER 2018 BY ISG. o EMAIL: RYAN.ANDERSON@ISGINC.COM AND VERTICAL COORDINATES FOR THIS PROJECT. I I I I I I I I 4"THICK RIGID,35 PSI MIN POLYSTYRENE INSULATION,R=15.0 MIN / Z //\ „w, //\///// 0 \j j\ (SEE TABLE) / �\ \// INTEGRAL INVERT OF MANHOLE TO SPRINGLINE OF PIPE SLOPED 2"/FT.TOWARD PIPE. CASTING A B //\//\// \ /\\//` CLEANOUT CAP SHALL BE NOTE: R-1642-B 27" 7" 0 \ \ \ �� \ \ '\ THREADED MALLEABLE IRON ENCLOSE LONG SWEEP BEND OR ESS.BRO.309 27" 7" // (GALVANIZED)COVERED WITH PVC WYE IN CONCRETE AS T COMPACTED BACKFILL /\\/\\/\ \\/\\/\ FORD TYPE A CASTING AND SHOWN.COVERED WITH FORD \ \ COVER TYPE A CASTING AND COVER 1 MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE PLACED SOCe - + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + i II //\/� , TTT THE OFFSET VERTICAL PORTION OF - + + + + + + + + + + + + + + \ /� c-try Er:�T". -Ar—n "i' THE CONE IS FACING DOWNSTREAM. + + + + + D + + + + + F GRANULAR BORROW \ \O \\ \ 7r�II�S,;-�IIII =11 fl�„�„rI_I'�`I_III. + + + + + + + + + IL=1 - JI-1L`= + + + + + + + MNDOT SPEC.3149.2B1 / CO -1 ++++++ Illp i7+5*�+++ -r /\\ /� // NEENAH FRAME AND COVER OR EQUAL, + + + + + + '\\/\\/\i ► 5CH.40 PVC CLEANOUT LETTERED"SANITARY SEWER"WITH 2 6„ - + + + + + + r \ RISER WITH FEMALE CONCALED PICK HOLES. - - + + + + + + /\ THREADED INSERT SET CASTING 1/8"TO 1/4"BELOW t "Q"=OUTSIDE \ FINISHED GRADE. Z D+12"MIN. DIA.OF PIPE \/\ E. � / PLAN / / / / / / / / / / / /\ MIN.OF 2,MAX.OF 6 HOPE ADJUSTMENT O PIPE FOUNDATION & BEDDING IN j\\j\\j\\j\\j\\j\\j\\j\\j\\j\\j\\j RINGS. MAXIMUM 19"AD]uSTMENr,RINGS / / / AND CASTING. 0 GOOD SOILS \ \/\\/• \\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\�\/\\ —; INSTALL I&I BARRIER. EXTERIOR SEAL \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ °A im `� CONSISTS OF]NFI SHIELD UNI BAND OR /\/ ///\/ •////\/ /\/ /\///` ` SCH.40 PVC WYE I � � ENGINEER APPROVED EQUAL. COMPACTED \\ \` \ \ \ mr' : a e;* "A" .-- Ce MANHOLE STEPS,COPOLYMER POLYPROPYLENE — 'r BACKFILL / ' TWO 45°BENDS o PLASTIC,WITH 1/2 GRADE 60 STEEL REINFORCEMENT OR EQUAL, 16"ON CENTER. O 12" Al,+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + IML ' ' + +, + + + + + +, - TYPICAL DIMENSIONS aI —lr + + + + + + D + + + + + + .�r GRANULAR BORROW /��' 111 <IO + + + + + + + + + MNDOT SPEC.3149.2B1 • PRECAST CONCRETE MANHOLE SECTIONS O.g D PER ASTM C478. ALL JOINTS IN MANHOLE ' AIL,+ + + + + + + + + + Ir PIPE DEPTH ,,w., ,° Rpm o r TO HAVE"0"RING RUBBER GASKETS PER 11 + + + + + + + t+ + + + ,IL, T ASTM C443. llx + + + + + + + + + + (FEET) (FEET) 4'0" SAL ALL JOINTS WITH A MINIMUM 101 11 6"PAY DEPTH _l / / / / / / / / / / i CONCRETE(MIN. 1/3 CU.YDS.) APPROVED EQUAL. r IMPROVED PIPE FOUNDATION LAYER OF GATOR WRAP OR ENGINEER INCREMENTS(IYP.) Jl '/ / / / / / / / I_; MNDOT SPEC.3149.2G.1 2 8 CONCRETE(MIN. 1/3 CU.YDS.) Q NOTE: Z II UTi_iii-ii ""r 3 6 Ce a THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND "D" =OUTSIDE _ > CUT PIPE 2"INSIDE FACE OF WALL. D+12"MIN. DIA.OF PIPE 4 4 END OF LINE CLEANOUT IN LINE CLEANOUT - GROUT INSIDE DOGHOUSE PER UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THISTEXT DOES I Ij nDOT2506.2B.2. NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN >m PIPE FOUNDATION & BEDDING IN NOTES. KOR-N-SEAL MANHOLE GASKET ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT INCe (OR APPROVED EQUAL). MISINTERPRETATION. POOR SOILS INSULATE ENTIRE SERVICE LENGTH OF SERVICE LINE SECTION INTEGRAL BASE SECTION 1 < NOTE: MININMUM DEPTH MANHOLE=7-9" J I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR - er- '-'\r- r \ .i REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTZ LAST REVISION: LAST REVISION: LAST REVISION: SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ••g JAN 2015 :AS•. JAN 2021 :.•d••• JAN 2021 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE �': BEDDING METHODS PIPE INSULATION ` STATE OF MINNESOTA. Apple FOR PVC SANITARY SEWER Apple SERVICE LINE CLEANOUTS Apple SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE2 Valley PLATE NO. Valley PLATE NO. Valley PLATE NO. RYAN J. ANDERSON GEN-7 NTS Y SER-3 Y SAN-1 J J J l DATE 09/20/2022 LIC. No. 55938 W THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I &S GROUP, Ce INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED p WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. � PROJECT COMPACTED BACKFILL 1 0 j\� APPLE VALLEY \j\ 1 TRENCH WIDTH,SEE TABLE j\j/\ \\\//\\/\ r { / //\\//\\//\\ CASTING A B R1642B 27" 7" SQUARE 7TH 0 \ \%\\\\ _ %\%\\%\\%/ • ESS.BRO.309 27" 7" �\ \ /\\/\\/\\/\\\/ POUR CONCRETE INVERT TO ECCENTRIC SIDE OF \// / / / / a ` ADDITION IX MANHOLE — 2„ j��j/� \ / j\\\/j\\�j\�j\':,/ SPRINGLIKE Of PIPE&SLOPE / 0 \ \ l I /\/\/\/\ FLOW 1,1 2"/FTTOWARDPIPE./ ` / �. �\ MIN. /\\//\\//\\//\\/ / j WASHER 1/8„T, I ,. ///\ /\\/\\/\\/\\� am / A / klir IP �, A �� 2"O.D„3/4"I,D, / /�\/ \ /�\//��/��/�� • ' MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE PLACED SO \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\� I■I (2 REQ./BOLT) //\\//\\//\\ /\\//\\//\\//\\/ THAT OFFSET VERTICAL PORTION OF I %//�////%%////%/. 23" - - 110" 23" \\ \ \ \ \\\\\\\\\\\�' • CONE IS FACING DOWNSTREAM, Air .. UP5/8"GALVANIZED /////////////\ N111k �, l BOLT PIPE OD BC \/\/\/\ \ `....,• .:...... \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ APPLE VALLEY MINNESOTA -. + --- is::::mow r iii: iiii -- . ( ) / / / / <- THREADED INSERT TO �.4444444' •••••"•' /\/\/ \/\/\/ PLAN NEENAH FRAME AND COVER OR EQUAL ••••••••••••••••••4 L J •••••••••••••••••••• n 00 // // // // // // // LETTERED,"STORM SEWER",WITH 2 REVISION SCHEDULE / a --lr RAMNEK OR • ACCEPT 3/4„0 BOLT .•,:;•::;;:•.': :;�;::•;••,'o'•• \ \\\ \ \\\\\\\\\/��%� EQUIVALENT a • (4 REQD.) ��'• ii\/// ///// /\ CONCEALED PICK HOLES. DATE DESCRIPTION BY 0 AEA, 1"DIA.HOLES IN MANHOLE BACKFILL W/GRANULAR \ \ \ SET CASTING 1/8"TO 1/4"BELOW ° MANHOLE CONE \ \ \/\//` FINISHED GRADE. MATERIAL OR SELECT . / 0 FRAME EVENLY SPACED /<i \i \ / \, •/ , ,� / / / / / / / 0.15 BC MIN.OF 2,MAX.OF 6 HDPE ADJUSTMENT REINFORCING ' L MATERIAL FROM \\ \\ \\ \ \ \ \� PLAN - I EXCAVATION TO 6" /\//\// / \\ /\\ \/\/\//�\ 00 RINGS. MAXIMUM 19"ADJUSTMENT,RINGS II:e EAST JORDAN 1490 ZPT RING & i /\ \/\�\/\/� I TOP COVER REMOVED COVER MARKED GREASE TRAP ABOVE PIPE // //\�/\/\ \�/\/\//\/\/` i AND CASTING. TIE DOWN DETAIL /\\ \\ \\ \/ /� \/\\/\\/\\/\\/� -1 INSTALL I&I BARRIER. EXTERIOR SEAL CONCRETE RISER / ��\\/\/\/\/\/\/\ \�\\ \/\ \/�\\��\\�/\\�\ NEEDED \/\/\/\/\/ < I "A" ��` CONSISTS OF INFI-SHIELD UNI-BAND OR O t STORM DRAIN PIPE 06 BC///j/�/ /j/�, ENGINEER APPROVED EQUAL. r. 11 NEENAH 1755E FRAME AND COVER OR �//�� /\j\\%/\%/\\�\//j\ 6"GRANULAR o \/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\� BEDDING • i MANHOLE STEPS,COPOLYMER POLYPROPYLENE % ' EQUAL,LETTERED"SANITARY SEWER', _ ,/ / / / / , PLASTIC,WITH 1/2"GRADE 60 STEEL LI- b. ,‘.....:1:1„..,iniihkii, WITH 2 CONCEALED PICK HOLES. \//\//\//\\//\/� _ •��\,\\ REINFORCEMENT OR EQUAL, 16"ON CENTER. C/L I PRECAST CONCRETE MANHOLE SECTIONS PROJECT NO. 16-19870 _ 4" OR 6" INLET AND C/L TRENCH WIDTH o I r PER ASTM C478. ALL JOINTS IN MANHOLE RAMNEK OR EQUIVALENT OUTLET POLY VI =a 4'_p' ��'A, TO HAVE A MINIMUM 1 LAYER OF GATOR FILE NAME 19870 CO DETAILS O SEAL CAST IN WALLS PIPE 0 TRENCH WIDTH DRAWN BY LFO MANHOLE STEPS,COPOLYMER i OR ENGINEERED APPROVED EQUAL AND POLYPROPOLENE PLASTIC,WITH 1/2" 94" - 46" - , AN"0"RING RUBBER GASKETS PER ASTM GRADE 60 STEEL REINFORCEMENT OR ,: b, C443. DESIGNED BY LFO/RJA Z . , EQUAL,16"ON CENTER. 6" HOLE-- 6" 36"OR LESS BC+24" a CUT PIPE 2"INSIDE ;:;' r — FACE OF WALL. GROUT DOGHOUSES REVIEWED BY RJA 42"TO 54" 1.5 x BCtai(c) INSIDE&OUTSIDE PER MNDOT �� _ _ 2506.2s2. ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 07/18/2022 >I" 6 60"DROVER BC+36" CLIENT PROJECT NO. - Ce "0"-RING GASKET [-I -I- 144" 156" 1 I _ . 1500 GALLON H-20 GREASE TRAP DETAIL -�PRECAST CONCRETE BASE NTS NOTES. SECTION POURED CONCRETE INVERT TITLE 1815 South Meyers Road CHICAGO OFFICE GRANULAR BEDDING AND BACKFILL FOR STORM DRAIN PIPES SHALL Z NOTE: THIS CASTING FOR USE IN LOCATIONS LAST REVISION: SECTION A-A ILA/ Suite 950 DETAIL LIBRARY DET BE INCIDENTAL TO STORM DRAIN CONSTRUCTION WHERE THE CASTING WILL BE SUBMERGED ---,r1r. -- FOR MORE THAN 4 HOURS. Oakbrook Terrace,IL 60181 •::•'ta JAN 2021 W O O L P�S R T 630.424.9080 400-009 STORM SEWER MANHOLE J II SITE DETAILS 2 — J , FAX:630.495.3731( +'Last Saved 01/07/22 LAST REVISION: Valley PLATE NO. ••., NON-CONCRETE STO-1 J ::'• APR 2009 •••• WATERTIGHT CASTING FOR ` _, APPen lley SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE PLATE NO. STORM DRAIN PIPE BEDDING W SAN-5 NTS O J l N , Ce CV o SHEET a N 6) di CI co - 20 J I I I 1 1 1 1 I I Z NOTES: HYDRANT MARKER WITH FLEX SPRING i Q TIE ROD ASSEMBLIES TO BE STAINLESS STEEL OR / DROP LID(CAST IRON) HYDRA/FINDER(CANDY CANE) HYDRANT SHALL BE WATEROUS \ NOTES: FUSION BONDED EPDXY COATED. WATER TYLER NO.6860 USE BLUE(CANDY CANE)TO INDICATE PACER WB-67-250 WITH 16"TRAFFIC \// mii ANTI-CORROSIVE COATING REQUIRED ON ALL . MUELLER NO. H-10361 COR-BLUE BOLTS&NUTS REQUIRED ON ALL APPLE VALLEYS MIDDLE PRESSURE ZONE BREAK OFF SECTION AND 8.5'BURY. \ BOLTS AND RESRAINT ASSEMBLIES. MECHANICAL JOINT FITTINGS. % AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER BREAK OFF LINE-MAXIMUM 2"ABOVE1111 AMff iimill111611 1 8.0'MINIMUM COVER REQUIRED OVERIR GRADE. i 8'MINIMUM COVER REQUIRED OVER TOP OF WATER MAIN. TOP OF WATER MAIN. 0 RESTRAIN TEE AND VALVE WITH MEGALUG WATERMAIN SHALL HAVE THRUST RESTRAINTS. (OR EQUAL) 8'-0"OF COVER. GRADE O\ ` A \/ 1[11 A /\ t ANTI CORROSIVE COATING111 JMPACTED TOP(CAST IRON) ADJUST TOP TO 318"BELOW GRADE. REQUIRED ON ALL BOLTS ANDOBACKFILLTYLER NO,6860 26" SETBOXTO PROVIDE 12"OF I ^ RESTRAINT ASSEMBLY. j MUELLER N0, H 10361 2fi" ADJUSTMENT. I \COR-BLUE BOLTS&NUTS REQUIRED (I0 ON ALL MECHANICAL JOINT FITTINGS, ROMAC"SST"STAINLESS STEEL TAPPING SLEEVE z PROVIDE COPPERWATERMAIN PIPE i 'v FOR VALVE BOX INSTALLTION SEE \� CONDUCTIVITY STRAP \/ \/\ EXTENSION(DUCTILE IRON) . DETAIL PLATE NO.WAT-1. TO BYPASS TAPPING Q \/\ \ \\j\ c.i L TYLER NO.6860 I I SLEEVE. // \ � TYLER NO.58 14" MUELLER NO. H-10357 GRADE r �\ \ \ \ NO. 59 18" RESTRAIN HYDRANT,VALVE,AND TEE \/ �\ \/ \i\�\'TY��\ kY�%�%\%�%,/ WITH MEGALUG THRUST RESTRAINT PLAN (1) � / 0 / N0.60 24" GATE X,SCREW TYPE,3 \\/y� \\\/ /�\/\\/\\/\�� GRANULAR BEDDING /\\�� \\�\ PIECE,VALVE5 1/4"SOHAFT SIZE G BOX, //\/\/�j\ /\/. 4\TO BACK OF CURB (OR EQUAL) /\\� / / p W MUELLER NO.58 14" 8'-0"EXTENDED,#6 ROUND BASE � /\ \� /\/\ N0.59 20" I ' ■ /\\�\ Ce \ . \\\/� + RESILIANT SEATED WEDGE OW RESILIENT SEATED WEDGE VALVE \\/\ '� �/ 2'6" CONFORMING TO AWWA C-509-80 RESILIANT SEATED GATE VALVE VALVE CONFORMING TO CONFORMING TO AWWA C-509-80 0 \�� \// _� AWWA C-509-80 STANDARDS STANDARDS. bo STANDARDS /\\/\ \/\/\/\/\/\/\/ /� BOTTOM(DUCTILE IRON) . mira,,,,am, MEGALUGS 14 \\\\ \\�/\��\�\\�\�\/�\�\\� MUELLER NO. H-10361 65" W PE VALVEIADVE COATING,APTER:4" TEFL *-�- * * ^C ^ Ili \\ • \ n RUBBER GASKET INSTALLED ": C 1;" .4 Iw� I f MEGALUGS / L BETWEEN GATE VALVE AND �� '� T��+ / �� \ • • H °1. VARIABLE + .+ .+ . .+ }+ OD+24"MAX _� GATE VALVE ADAPTER f+��4a! '4` '0 ', "� ffL.. f r e / '\ \ \, yISM �\ �\\ /.` r MEGALUGS ' /\/\/\ / BASE MEGALUGS e / 3 e •, \ /,o / \�/\��\��\��\\� /�'/� COMPACTED GRANULAR BACKFILL 0 : " (icy 11 � ��` a o o._T CONCRETE THRUST NOTE: Z i � tBLOCK UNDISTURBED EARTH , /4017._ 6" LAD $"CONC.BLOCKTHE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND • • r UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES NOTE■ ICU.YD.OF 1 112"ROCK. COVER WITH 2 SECTION A-A >m $"CONC. BLOCK \%: ON: BLO CK LAYERS OF POLYETHYLENE. NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN (TYPICAL) J ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN Ce GRANULAR BEDDING AND ENCASEMENT FOR WATERMAIN PIPES SHALL BE 1 rMISINTERPRETATION. INCIDENTAL TO CONSTRUCTION LAST REVISION: ••• LAST REVISION: LAST REVISION: bill .S❖.: ::• iiY�• JAN 2021 ii•• JAN 2021 ■;r•� JUNE 2009 ••• GATE VALVE & BOX VALVE & HYDRANT . WATERMAIN WET TAP I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR Apple INSTALLATION Apple INSTALLATION Apple REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT Z PLATE NO. ValleyPLATE NO. PLATE NO. Valley WAT-1 WAT-3 Valley WAT 5 SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PI PE BEDDING PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE J STATE OF MINNESOTA. 2 WATER MAIN RYAN J. ANDERSON NTS DATE 09/20/2022 LIC. No. 55938 W THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I &S GROUP, Ce INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED a WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. PROJECT Z O APPLE VALLEY I- SQUARE 7TH 0 TRAFFIC SIGN SPECIFICATIONS ADDITION p STOP SIGN SHALL BE R1-1,30"X30"OR TRAFFIC AS DIRECTED BY CITY ENGINEER. IX SIGN STOP SIGN AND STREET SIGNS SHALL j \ NOT BE INSTALLED ON THE SAME POST. MATERIAL ALUMINUM SHALL BE 5052-H38 OR N 6061-T6ALLOY. APPLE VALLEY MINNESOTA __/// GAUGE SHALL BE.080 ON THE LONGEST SIDE UP TO 30", .100 ON THE LONGEST 6" Z SIDE OVER 30". 1 REVISION SCHEDULE DATE DESCRIPTION BY Q o REFLECTING SHEETING SHALL BE 1 I DIAMOND GRADE VIP. ALL SIGNS SHALL CONFORM TO MN/DOT 0 3 F., ' 4D (1) o SPEC.3352,SIGNS,DELINEATORS AND O R3" R3" ° o MARKERS-STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS STEEL FOR CONSTRUCTION. Ce CHANNEL - POST CHANNEL POST SPECIFICATIONS V a o STEEL CHANNEL POSTS SHALL WEIGH . ° ° ° ° O o 3LB./FT. _ ° POSTS SHALL BE OF THE 4-RIB DESIGN, HORIZONTAL LINE Um • GALVANIZED AND PUNCHED ON 1" — CENTERS. — 12" 8" o PROJECT NO. 16-19870 o FILE NAME 19870 CO DETAILS O I I I — DRAWN BY LFO EIIII� { NOTES:• Z DESIGNED BY LFO/RJA 1 t _ Q LONGITUDINAL JOINT WHEN ADJACENT TO RIGID PAVEMENT OR BASE. REVIEWED BY RJA • O SLOPE 0.06FTIFT NORMAL,UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. IF A DIFFERENT GUTTER SLOPE IS >m u/ ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 07/18/2022 z PERMITTED,THE FORM MAY BE TILTED. CLIENT PROJECT NO. - Ce O CURB AND GUTTER FOUNDATION SHALL CONSIST OF MINIMUM 6"THICK MNDOT CLASS 5 , < AGGREGATE BASE,EXTENDED A MINIMUM OF 12"BEHIND THE BACK OF CURB. TITLE �� Z ••• LAST REVISION: ::••:• OCT 2009 Apple 1, TRAFFIC SIGN IN GROUND Valley PLATE NO. SITE DETAILS 2 STR-22 B612 -I CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER W M NTS CeN o SHEET a N O) di Q 0 Co _ 21 - 0 J 0 1 1 1 1 PROPOSED LAYOUT PROPOSED ELEVATIONS ! *INVERT ABOVE BASE OF CHAMBER TE21 STORMTECH MC-3500 CHAMBERS MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE GRADE(TOP OF PAVEMENT/UNPAVED): 958.25 PART TYPE LAYOUT DESCRIPTION INVERT' MAX FLOW 1!6 STORMTECH MC-35D0 END CAPS MINIMUM ALLOWABLE GRADE(UNPAVED WITH TRAFFIC): 952.25 PREFABRICATED END CAP A 12"BOTTOM CORED END CAP,PART#:MC3500IEPP12B I TYP OF ALL 12"BOTTOM CONNECTIONS 1.35" PROJECT INFORMATION 12 STONE ABOVE(in) MINIMUM ALLOWABLE GRADE(UNPAVED NO TRAFFIC): 951 75 PREFABRICATED END CAP B 12"TOP CORED END CAP,PART#:MC3500IEPP12T I TYP OF ALL 12"TOP CONNECTIONS 26.36' 4 III 9 STONE BELOW(in) MINIMUM ALLOWABLE GRADE(TOP OF RIGID CONCRETE PAVEMENT): 951.75 Z r' 24"BOTTOM CORED END CAP,PART#:MC35001EPP24BC/TYP OF ALL 24"BOTTOM 0 ENGINEERED PRODUCT 40 STONE VOID MINIMUM ALLOWABLE GRADE(BASE OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT): 951.75 PREFABRICATED END CAP C CONNECTIONS AND ISOLATOR PLUS ROWS 2.06" Z J w o MANAGER _ 1• INSTALLED SYSTEM VOLUME(CF) TOP OF STONE: 951.25 M Z 0 0 S iteAssist 1• (PERIMETER STONE INCLUDED) TOP OF MC-3500 CHAMBER: 950.25 MANFLAIEFDLD E 2SxA2'TOP MAN FOLD,ADS NLL FLAMP ON 24"ACCESS 121PE 1 PART#:MC350024RAMP(TYP 2 PLACES) 26.36" O0 w •¢ D' o en 4464 {COVER STONE INCLUDED) 12"x 12"TOP MANIFOLD INVERT: 948.7p - - _ FOR STORMTECH00 m ADS SALES REP INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS (BASE STONE INCLUDED) 12"x 12"TOP MANIFOLD INVERT: 948.70 MANIFOLD F 12"x 12"TOP MANIFOLD,ADS N-12 26.36" Q1 _J 4 0 o Ill A D STA VISIT OUR APP III :1 1375 SYSTEM AREA(SF) 24"ISOLATOR ROW PLUS INVERT: 946.67 CONCRETE STRUCTURE G (DESIGN BY ENGINEER I PROVIDED BY OTHERS) 2.5 CFS IN j o - PROJECT NO. - Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. 171.4 SYSTEM PERIMETER(ft) 24"ISOLATOR ROW PLUS INVERT: 946.67 CONCRETE STRUCTURE H (DESIGN BY ENGINEER!PROVIDED BY OTHERS) 2.5 CFS IN cO ° 12"BOTTOM CONNECTION INVERT: 946.61 CONCRETE STRUCTURE I (DESIGN BY ENGINEER 1 PROVIDED BY OTHERS) 5.0 CFS IN ' 0Pe BOTTOM OF MC-3500 CHAMBER: 946.50 BOTTOM OF STONE: 945.75 2 # - 16- 19870 0 w , APPLE VALLEY, MN ❑ D i F, MC-3500 STORMTECH CHAMBER SPECIFICATIONS IMPORTANT-NOTES FOR THE BIDDING AND INSTALLATION OF MC-3500 CHAMBER SYSTEMCe 63.45' Z w 1. CHAMBERS SHALL BE STORMTECH MC-3500. 1. STORMTECH MC-3500 CHAMBERS SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED UNTIL THE MANUFACTURER'S REPRESENTATIVE HAS COMPLETED A 53 92, - 0 i a PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING WITH THE INSTALLERS. o E wg 2. CHAMBERS SHALL BE ARCH-SHAPED AND SHALL BE MANUFACTURED FROM VIRGIN,IMPACT-MODIFIED POLYPROPYLENE 2. STORMTECH MC-3500 CHAMBERS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE"STORMTECH MC-3500/MC-4500 CONSTRUCTION GUIDE". co0 c SI COPOLYMERS, w x,,Aa ,3. CHAMBERS ARE NOT TO BE BACKFILLED WITH A DOZER OR AN EXCAVATOR SITUATED OVER THE CHAMBERS. ' CO 3. CHAMBERS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM F2418,"STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR POLYPROPYLENE(PP)CORRUGATED STORMTECH RECOMMENDS 3 BACKFILL METHODS:WALL STORMWATER COLLECTION CHAMBERS"CHAMBER CLASSIFICATION 45x76 DESIGNATION SS. • STONESHOOTER LOCATED OFF THE CHAMBER BED. • BACKFILL AS ROWS ARE BUILT USING AN EXCAVATOR ON THE FOUNDATION STONE OR SUBGRADE. // 4. CHAMBER ROWS SHALL PROVIDE CONTINUOUS,UNOBSTRUCTED INTERNAL SPACE WITH NO INTERNAL SUPPORTS THAT WOULD • BACKFILL FROM OUTSIDE THE EXCAVATION USING A LONG BOOM HOE OR EXCAVATOR. Y s IMPEDE FLOW OR LIMIT ACCESS FOR INSPECTION. a4. THE FOUNDATION STONE SHALL BE LEVELED AND COMPACTED PRIOR TO PLACING CHAMBERS. 8 rcO5. THE STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF THE CHAMBERS,THE STRUCTURAL BACKFILL,AND THE INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS SHALL ENSUREI I :F. NTHAT THE LOAD FACTORS SPECIFIED IN THE AASHTO LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS,SECTION 12.12,ARE MET FOR:1) 5. JOINTS BETWEEN CHAMBERS SHALL BE PROPERLY SEATED PRIOR TO PLACING STONE. gLONG-DURATION DEAD LOADS AND 2)SHORT-DURATION LIVE LOADS,BASED ON THE AASHTO DESIGN TRUCK WITH CONSIDERATIONFOR IMPACT AND MULTIPLE VEHICLE PRESENCES. 6. MAINTAIN MINIMUM-6"(150 mm)SPACING BETWEEN THE CHAMBER ROWS. S g d 7. INLET AND OUTLET MANIFOLDS MUST BE INSERTED A MINIMUM OF 12 (300 mm)INTO CHAMBER END CAPS. �a 0 6. CHAMBERS SHALL BE DESIGNED,TESTED AND ALLOWABLE LOAD CONFIGURATIONS DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM F2787, �_ "STANDARD PRACTICE FOR STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF THERMOPLASTIC CORRUGATED WALL STORMWATER COLLECTION CHAMBERS". ►��•�� x�c c c�n�w�cx�c ca�cx�c c�c�n cx�x�c ��.�.�.�.� < B. EMBEDMENT STONE SURROUNDING CHAMBERS MUST BE A CLEAN,CRUSHED,ANGULAR STONE MEETING THE AASHTO M43 DESIGNATION OF#3 ♦�♦ ��♦ LOAD CONFIGURATIONS SHALL INCLUDE:1)INSTANTANEOUS(<1 MIN}AASHTO DESIGN TRUCK LIVE LOAD ON MINIMUM COVER 2} OR •.•.�• �♦�.�. H w MAXIMUM PERMANENT(75-YR)COVER LOAD AND 3)ALLOWABLE COVER WITH PARKED(1-WEEK)AASHTO DESIGN TRUCK. ► :�• �•�:� Ej Ce D 9. STONE MUST BE PLACED ON THE TOP CENTER OF THE CHAMBER TO ANCHOR THE CHAMBERS IN PLACE AND PRESERVE ROW SPACING. �♦ •♦♦ C 6 ' 7. REQUIREMENTS FOR HANDLING AND INSTALLATION: I E N N F w - O • TO MAINTAIN THE WIDTH OF CHAMBERS DURING SHIPPING AND HANDLING,CHAMBERS SHALL HAVE INTEGRAL,INTERLOCKING 10. THE CONTRACTOR MUST REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES WITH CHAMBER FOUNDATION MATERIALS BEARING CAPACITIES TO THE SITE DESIGN F B N )1 m w STACKING LUGS. ENGINEER. •• TO ENSURE A SECURE JOINT DURING INSTALLATION AND BACKFILL,THE HEIGHT OF THE CHAMBER JOINT SHALL NOT BE LESSrI;t .'- '- '- '- - *�� ATHAN 3". 11. ADS RECOMMENDS THE USE OF"FLEXSTORM CATCH IT'INSERTS DURING CONSTRUCTION FOR ALL INLETS TO PROTECT THE SUBSURFACE !P 4 GC1E• TO ENSURE THE INTEGRITY QF THE ARCH SHAPE DURING INSTALLATION,a)THE ARCH STIFFNESS CONSTANT SHALL BE GREATER THAN OR EQUA TO 450 LBSIFT/%THE ASC IS DEFINED N SECTION 6.28 OF ASTM F2418 AND b)TO RESIST CHAMBERSTORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FROM CONSTRUCTION SITE RUNOFF. > CD 1),DEFORMATION DURING INSTALLATION AT ELEVATED TEMPERATURES(ABOVE 73°F/23°C),CHAMBERS SHALL BE PRODUCED NOTES FOR CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT }-' cn FROM REFLECTIVE GOLD OR YELLOW COLORS. g1. STORMTECH MC-3500 CHAMBERS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE"STORMTECH MC-35001MC-4500 CONSTRUCTION GUIDE". oper8. ONLY CHAMBERS THAT ARE APPROVED BY THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER WILL BE ALLOWED.UPON REQUEST BY HE SITE DESIGN ��•� E m '? ENGINEER OR OWNER,THE CHAMBER MANUFACTURER SHALL SUBMIT A STRUCTURAL EVALUATION FOR APPROVAL BEFORE 2. THE USE OF EQUIPMENT OVER MC-3500 CHAMBERS IS LIMITED: • s o O DELIVERING CHAMBERS TO THE PROJECT SITE AS FOLLOWS: • NO EQUIPMENT IS ALLOWED ON BARE CHAMBERS. °- • THE STRUCTURAL EVALUATION SHALL BE SEALED BY A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER. • NO RUBBER TIRED LOADER,DUMP TRUCK,OR EXCAVATORS ARE ALLOWED UNTIL PROPER FILL DEPTHS ARE REACHED IN ACCORDANCE N U o w • THE STRUCTURAL EVALUATION SHALL DEMONSTRATE THAT THE SAFETY FACTORS ARE GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 1.95 FOR WITH THE"STORMTECH MC-3500/MC-4500 CONSTRUCTION GUIDE". � �� ii F DEAD LOAD AND 1.75 FOR LIVE LOAD,THE MINIMUM REQUIRED BY ASTM F2787 AND BY SECTIONS 3 AND 12.12 OF THE AASHTO • WEIGHT LIMITS FOR CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT CAN BE FOUND IN THE"STORMTECH MC-3500/MC-4500 CONSTRUCTION GUIDE". •• k 4.4, o i 5 NOTE: Z LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS FOR THERMOPLASTIC PIPE. ��OOt� �w �� L j ]� o • THE TEST DERIVED CREEP MODULUS AS SPECIFIED IN ASTM F2418 SHALL BE USED FOR PERMANENT DEAD LOAD DESIGN 3. FULL 36"(900 mm)OF STABILIZED COVER MATERIALS OVER THE CHAMBERS IS REQUIRED FOR DUMP TRUCK TRAVEL OR DUMPING. ►.�2i♦ .�.�..y. ��.0 y./-,r„� l./y ti,,,� �cv�c w rw�c - - +V `=i 0 11" a' THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS D E P E N D EXCEPT THAT IT SHALL BE THE 75-YEAR MODULUS USED FOR DESIGN. 1 z a o w USE OF A DOZER TO PUSH EMBEDMENT STONE BETWEEN THE ROWS OF CHAMBERS MAY CAUSE DAMAGE TO CHAMBERS AND IS NOT AN ACCEPTABLE ¢_^ o UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES 9. CHAMBERS AND END CAPS SHALL BE PRODUCED AT AN ISO 9001 CERTIFIED MANUFACTURING FACILITY. BACKFILL METHOD.ANY CHAMBERS DAMAGED BY USING THE"DUMP AND PUSH"METHOD ARE NOT COVERED UNDER THE STORMTECH STANDARD w O. o w WARRANTY. teams w= NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN >m ~¢^ I:e< CONTACT STORMTECH AT 1-8$8-892-2694 WITH ANY QUESTIONS ON INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS OR WEIGHT LIMITS FOR CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT. ��$ [n- w 5 ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN `_' • it MISINTERPRETATION. \\N,(SEE ROW PLUS i 0 \ (SEE DETAIL) - NOTES ; I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR PLACE MINIMUM 17.50'OF ADSPLUS175 WOVEN GEOTEXTILE OVER BEDDING • MANIFOLD SIZE TO BE DETERMINED BY SITE DESIGN ENGINEER.SEE TECH NOTE#6.32 FOR MANIFOLD SIZING GUIDANCE. REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT STONE AND UNDERNEATH CHAMBER FEET FOR SCOUR PROTECTION AT ALL ' DUE COMPONENTSTHE IN ADAPTATION OF THIS CHAMBER SYSTEM TO SPECIFIC SITE AND DESIGN CONSTRAINTS,IT MAY BE NECESSARY TO CUT AND COUPLE ADDITIONAL PIPE TO STANDARD MANIFOLD �•�♦�♦�t�CHAMBER INLET ROWS -- °S SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED • THIS CHAMBERS STEM WAS DESIGNED WI WITHOUT ELEVATIONS SPECIFIC S INFORMATION ON SOIL CONDITIONS OR BEARING CAPACITY.THE SITEA DESIGN ENGINEERS RESPONSIBLE FOR ,-' DETERMINING PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE THE SUITABILITY OF THE SOIL AND PROVIDING THE BEARING CAPACITY OF THE INSITU SOILS.THE BASE STONE DEPTH MAY BE INCREASED OR DECREASED ONCE THIS INFORMATION IS SHEET - -BED LIMITS PROVIDED. 2 OF STATE OF MINNESOTA. 5 2 ,D2022 ADS,NC. •• NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION:THIS LAYOUT IS FOR DIMENSIONAL PURPOSES ONLY TO PROVE CONCEPT&THE REQUIRED STORAGE VOLUME CAN BE ACHIEVED ON SITE. RYAN J. AN D E RS O N DATE 09/20/2022 LIC. NO. 55938 W THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, I:e INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. Om PROJECT ACCEPTABLE FILL MATERIALS: STORMTECH MC-3500 CHAMBER SYSTEMS PAINST #:MC35 024RAMLL FLAMP ON 24"(600mm}ACCESS PIPE OPTIONALINSPECTIDNPORT OZ PART#:MC350024RAMP 5' • X COVER PIPE CONNECTION TO END CAP WITH ADS Q 8 z o GEOSYNTHETICS 601T NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE MC-3500 CHAMBER z N APPLE VA L L E Y AASHTO MATERIAL MATERIAL LOCATION DESCRIPTION COMPACTION I DENSITY REQUIREMENT Z 0 _o MC-3500END CAP Z -D W a CLASSIFICATIONS m z Y M z LI j > uUi F STORMTECH HIGHLY RECOMMENDS = } < w FINAL FILL:FILL MATERIAL FOR LAYER'D'STARTS FROM THE TOP OF THE'C' w rir /lilt////f///7iiiii/1////////////// /////////////////f///il/ rw.rrrrrrrrvrrve T ws�r.�.va.vrrii w PREPARE PER SITE DESIGN ENGINEER'S PLANS.PAVED CO = N FLEXSTORM INSERTS IN ANY UPSTREAM - co _, CC _ LAYER TO THE BOTTOM OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT OR UNPAVED FINISHED ANY SOIL/ROCK MATERIALS,NATIVE SOILS,OR PER ENGINEER'S PLANS. 0 U z gd ,;' :�;;w j;;;a: • O U a p N/A INSTALLATIONS MAY HAVE STRINGENT MATERIAL AND ¢ -,°, STRUCTURES WITH OPEN GRATES -ekilli ¢ ° SQUARE 7 T H 0 GRADE ABOVE.NOTE THAT PAVEMENT SUBBASE MAY BE PART OF THE'D' CHECK PLANS FOR PAVEMENT SUBGRADE REQUIREMENTS. r ° a•a r < o LAYER PREPARATION REQUIREMENTS- 6 1-11 .G a�,,f.4 6 AASHTO M145' Ot 6 e "`.., ¢ `Z ADDITION GRANULAR WELL-GRADED SOILIAGGREGATE MIXTURES,<35%FINES OR A-I,A-2-4,A-3 BEGIN COMPACTIONS AFTER 24"(600 mm)OF MATERIAL OVER ? "�",�s.a+� a INITIAL FILL:FILL MATERIAL FOR LAYER'C'STARTS FROM THE TOP OF THE PROCESSED AGGREGATE. THE CHAMBERS IS REACHED.COMPACT ADDITIONAL LAYERS IN g .ax;° EMBEDMENT STONE('B'LAYER)TO 24"(600 mm)ABOVE THE TOP OF THE C OR 12"(300 mm)MAX LIFTS TO A MIN.95%PROCTOR DENSITY FOR tCe CHAMBER.NOTE THAT PAVEMENT SUBBASE MAY BE A PART OF THE'C' U y U MOST PAVEMENT SUBBASE MATERIALS CAN BE USED IN LIEU OF THIS WELL GRADED MATERIAL AND 95%RELATIVE DENSITY FOR co w LAYER. LAYER. AASHTO M43' PROCESSED AGGREGATE MATERIALS. IL p . CATCH BASIN A N O 1 3,357,4,467,5,56,57,6,67,68,7,78,8,89,9,10 a a_ w 1 I Idol r\\ Qo a a a < MANHOLE t,•%1.1 � 114 I \EMBEDMENT STONE:FILL SURROUNDING THE CHAMBERS FROM THE AASHTO M43' N i' 1111 B CLEAN,CRUSHED,ANGULAR STONE NO COMPACTION REQUIRED. �^ Y': " �<' FOUNDATION STONE('A'LAYER)TO THE'C'LAYER ABOVE. 3,4 w I &�!'r�� 1 !� w Z zr o`� ` ��' w APPLE VALLEY MINNESOTA > �, CO Z w FOUNDATION STONE:FILL BELOW CHAMBERS FROM THE SUBGRADE UP TO AASHTO M43' O s 1, l 0 w E A THE FOOT(BOTTOM)OF THE CHAMBER. CLEAN,CRUSHED,ANGULAR STONE 3 4 PLATE COMPACT OR ROLL TO ACHIEVE A FLAT SURFACE.23 IL 9 • TIC'} a U 2 V 3 t1 __ ► Ii +.l ll 1 l _l 1. ►1 � � i,, FcOF, PLEASE NOTE: 41 N, SUMP DEPTH TBD BY • w .w REVISION SCHEDULE 1. THE LISTED AASHTO DESIGNATIONS ARE FOR GRADATIONS ONLY.THE STONE MUST ALSO BE CLEAN,CRUSHED,ANGULAR.FOR EXAMPLE,A SPECIFICATION FOR#4 STONE WOULD STATE:"CLEAN,CRUSHED,ANGULAR NO,4(AASHTO M43)STONE", 0 F a SITE DESIGN ENGINEER 0 8 a DATE DESCRIPTION BY 2. STORMTECH COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS ARE MET FOR'A'LOCATION MATERIALS WHEN PLACED AND COMPACTED IN 9"(230 mm)(MAX)LIFTS USING TWO FULL COVERAGES WITH A VIBRATORY COMPACTOR. (24"[600 mm]MIN RECQMMENDED) ° 0 3. WHERE INFILTRATION SURFACES MAY BE COMPROMISED BY COMPACTION,FOR STANDARD DESIGN LOAD CONDITIONS,A FLAT SURFACE MAY BE ACHIEVED BY RAKING OR DRAGGING WITHOUT COMPACTION EQUIPMENT.FOR SPECIAL LOAD DESIGNS,CONTACT STORMTECH FOR .0 i FACTORY mm)HOPE ACCESS PIPE REQUIRED USE a a COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS. v ONE LAYER OF ADSPLUS175 WOVEN GEOTEXTILE BETWEEN v 4. ONCE LAYER'C'IS PLACED,ANY SOIL/MATERIAL CAN BE PLACED IN LAYER'D'UP TO THE FINISHED GRADE.MOST PAVEMENT SUBBASE SOILS CAN BE USED TO REPLACE THE MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS OF LAYER'C'OR'D'AT THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER'S DISCRETION. w t PRE-CORED END CAP FOUNDATION STONE AND CHAMBERS z 6 (IIII) PART#:MC3500IEPP24BC OR MC3500IEPP24BW = a 8.25'(2.51 m)MIN WIDE CONTINUOUS FABRIC WITHOUT SEAMS = U 18 U x 5 ce a MC-3500 ISOLATOR ROW PLUS DETAIL_ ix 3 ❑ ag NTS ❑ a5 0 Lu r8 Ce PAVEMENT LAYER a ADS GEOSYNTHETICS 601T NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE ALL (DESIGNED H. H.. H. AROUND CLEAN,CRUSHED,ANGULAR STONE IN A&B LAYERS BY SITE DESIGN ENGINEER) ❑ ❑ o a O s .k.."."b.L...L-----------.----- ..,... .,> ,>..,v.�,s.�, 4 zw ti� INSPECTION & MAINTENANCE F, ww s.g 'TO BOTTOM OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT.FOR UNPAVED 8' Q S 0 S INSTALLATIONS WHERE RUTTING FROM VEHICLES MAY occurs, 18' 24 2 N8 STEP 1) INSPECT ISOLATOR ROW PLUS FOR SEDIMENT = 88 PERIMETER STONE +NCREA5E COVER TO 24"rsoa Tin UM ( m) ow ' (450 mm)MIN" MAX w F o A. INSPECTION PORTS(IF PRESENT) w ° (SEE NOTE 4) _w F �w 12"(300 mm)MIN , " A.1. REMOVEIOPEN LID ON NYLOPLAST INLINE DRAIN , I Le w` A.2. REMOVE AND CLEAN FLEXSTORM FILTER IF INSTALLED cc IT 5`c lIllll� y, © ! '+ f' 1 { j y o. A.3. USING A FLASHLIGHT AND STADIA ROD,MEASURE DEPTH OF SEDIMENT AND RECORD ON MAINTENANCE LOG S 0 oY PROJECT NO. 16-19870 ! q:d�IIIKi��,`1 / / 1i 1 I as z� EXCAVATION WALL OIf I�'II ' ` �, I, 1u1 v E ° A.4. LOWER A CAMERA INTO ISOLATOR ROW PLUS FOR VISUAL INSPECTION OF SEDIMENT LEVELS(OPTIONAL) E CAN BE SLOPED OR VERTICAL) 11.;111filit � { �l�„ d�L45" Co A.5. IF SEDIMENT IS AT,OR ABOVE,3"(80 mm)PROCEED TO STEP 2.IF NOT,PROCEED TO STEP 3. FILE NAME 19870 CO DETAILSO( �'lli' (1140 mm) a _ aB. ALL ISOLATOR PLUS ROWS T _ ar+ ,i,i �� r t�j� F F EB.1. REMOVE COVER FROM STRUCTURE AT UPSTREAM END OF ISOLATOR ROW PLUS ~ S rDRAWN BY LFO I I i \II 1. - I I qp/,`l I! r.�% � II 'n '° - B.2. USING A FLASHLIGHT,INSPECT DOWN THE ISOLATOR ROW PLUS THROUGH OUTLET PIPE rc- I I '' „ r 1 �I I\1 I If,, .� 11. U II I L Q w I I 1 4' hI_ f i) MIRRORS ON POLES OR CAMERAS MAY BE USED TO AVOID A CONFINED SPACE ENTRY I. .0 , a DESIGNED BY LFO/RJA Z I A O E m 8 E ii) FOLLOW OSHA REGULATIONS FOR CONFINED SPACE ENTRY IF ENTERING MANHOLE 0 E co o F }I m m g N B.3. IF SEDIMENT IS AT,OR ABOVE,3"(80 mm)PROCEED TO STEP 2.iF NOT,PROCEED TO STEP 3. �I 0 °'• L DEPTH OF STONE TO BE DETERMINED �� N v !_.R.� REVIEWEDBY RJA II ,I =II III, w aI',` BY SITE DESIGN ENGINEER 9"(230 mm)MIN STEP 2) CLEAN OUTISOLATOR ROW PLUSUSINGTHEJENAC PROCESS6"(150 mm)MIN 6„ _ - - - > A. A FIXED CULVERT CLEANIG NOZZLE WITH REAR FACING SPREAD OF 45"(1.1 m)OR MORE IS PREFERRED I >M L.-- a ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 07/18/2022 ENDMC-CAP0 (150 mm)MIN 77"(1950 mm) - 12"(300 mm)MIN g B. APPLY MULTIPLE PASSES OF JETVAC UNTIL BACKFLUSH WATER IS CLEAN SUBGRADE NOTE SOILS (SEE 3) N gsg C. VACUUM STRUCTURE SUMP AS REQUIRED N CLIENT PROJECT NO. IX z a„ 0 o STEP 3) REPLACE ALL COVERS,GRATES,FILTERS,AND LIDS;RECORD OBSERVATIONS AND ACTIONS. z a co o 0 NOTES: ¢_rr _, ¢_^ 6p - WON- 2 i STEP 4) INSPECT AND CLEAN BASINS AND MANHOLES UPSTREAM OF THE STORMTECH SYSTEM. U O Aci i o Eri 1. CHAMBERS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM F2418,"STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR POLYPROPYLENE(PP)CORRUGATED WALL STORMWATER COLLECTION CHAMBERS"CHAMBER CLASSIFICATION 45x76 0 1 H cc N TITLE DESIGNATION 5S. o D m wo J m NI 2. MC-3500 CHAMBERS SHALL BE DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM F2787"STANDARD PRACTICE FOR STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF THERMOPLASTIC CORRUGATED WALL STORMWATER COLLECTION CHAMBERS". a.I.- g o NOTES _ o Z 3. THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ASSESSING THE BEARING RESISTANCE(ALLOWABLE BEARING CAPACITY)OF THE SUBGRADE SOILS AND THE DEPTH OF FOUNDATION STONE WITH CONSIDERATION o 1. INSPECT EVERY 6 MONTHS DURING THE FIRST YEAR OF OPERATION,ADJUST THE INSPECTION INTERVAL BASED ON PREVIOUS a V' N FOR THE RANCE OF EXPECTED SOIL MOISTURE CONDITIONS. w F OBSERVATIONS OF SEDIMENT ACCUMULATION AND HIGH WATER ELEVATIONS. W F STORMTECH 4. PERIMETER STONE MUST BE EXTENDED HORIZONTALLY TO THE EXCAVATION WALL FOR BOTH VERTICAL AND SLOPED EXCAVATION WALLS. 8 5. REQUIREMENTS FOR HANDLING AND INSTALLATION: z o VOL 2. CONDUCT JETTING AND VACTORING ANNUALLY OR WHEN INSPECTION SHOWS THAT MAINTENANCE IS NECESSARY. it TO MAINTAIN THE WIDTH OF CHAMBERS DURING SHIPPING AND HANDLING,CHAMBERS SHALL HAVE INTEGRAL,INTERLOCKING STACKING LUGS. = S 8 S S DETAILS • TO ENSURE A SECURE JOINT DURING INSTALLATION AND BACKFILL,THE HEIGHT OF THE CHAMBER JOINT SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 3". T 2 • TO ENSURE THE INTEGRITY OF THE ARCH SHAPE DURING INSTALLATION,a)THE ARCH STIFFNESS CONSTANT SHALL BE GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 450 LBSIFT%.THE ASC IS DEFINED IN SECTION 6.2.8 OF E'°` S ASTM F2418.AND b)TO RESIST CHAMBER DEFORMATION DURING INSTALLATION AT ELEVATED TEMPERATURES(ABOVE 73°F 123°C),CHAMBERS SHALL BE PRODUCED FROM REFLECTIVE GOLD OR YELLOW SHEET SHEET COLORS. 3 OF 5 4 OF 5 Ui Q IX o SHEET a N ) Ed Q C C 0 = 2 2 I- 0 J 0 I I I I MC-3500 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION NTS VALLEY - 86.0"(2184 mm) STIFFENING RIB CREST INSTALLED O z - z J a z CREST WEB j 'I ��l ��l �� R-� y� -I R O U o STIFFENING RIB 1•} [j1 �I •}I �•}I t•0I �i•31 �i•�'I �( ti } ¢ w a1:::: CORRUGATIONLOWER JOINT Ii ' II II II I II I I Ii � UIIIIIII II II10 I I 1 I BP‘1. II I Ili 111 I�I III III iI !I iIII' !IIPrP lll ;I II ;jl , IUi III F T p OD1 I 'I,I1►, '•11 •11' 1 < CC , 0 UPPER JOINT CORRUGATIONJ JBUILD ROW IN THIS DIREGTION iiI+I i�II l i-I I.i�-+.Fi il �-+l'Fit+l1 N 1 Ce I l 111'II\ 90.0"(2286 mm) I Z .z `, f ACTUAL LENGTH O w LI ��11,'II/�Iwtll1� 11 NL I�yy11I�I�1111 o I- ES 45.0" 45.0" f'Ii, 11 �� } R wa rrll \�I/V 22.2" N (1143 mm) (1143 mm) IMilitilli I+I,�I'1►�'IIII`�1i ,III / (564 mm) L- q L13CO Ill;' L,_, INSTALLED a a h Z �o I- (1956mm) -I !- 75.0" ` U �� I (1905 mm) �: O NOMINAL CHAMBER SPECIFICATIONS 1` x &x SIZE(W X H X INSTALLED LENGTH) 77.0"X 45.0"X 86.0" (1956 mm X 1143 mm X 2184 mm) o ¢w CHAMBER STORAGE 109.9 CUBIC FEET (3.11 m') (' w F ST (1.11) MINIMUM INSTALLED STORAGE` 175.0 CUBIC FEET (4.96 m') "I ¢ o= WEIGHT 134 tbs. (60.8 kg) o o a 25.7" I a NOMINAL END CAP SPECIFICATIONS —1 (653 mm) C` L, MC-SERIES END CAP INSERTION DETAIL SIZE(W X H X INSTALLED LENGTH) 75.0"X 45.0"X 22.2" (1905 mm X 1143 mm X 564 mm) O w NTS END CAP STORAGE 14.9 CUBIC FEET (0.42 m') Ce �' MINIMUM INSTALLED STORAGE' 45.1 CUBIC FEET (1.28 m') o w WEIGHT 49 lbs. (22.2 kg) r ,,,- O STORMTECH END CAP -w I w� 'ASSUMES 12"(305 mm)STONE ABOVE,9'(229 mm)STONE FOUNDATION,6"SPACING BETWEEN 1111 I��il O o �o CHAMBERS,6" 152 mm STONE PERIMETER IN FRONT OF END CAPS AND 40%STONE POROSITY ii f ;�I w IML MIN SEPARATION I STUBS AT BOTTOM OF END CAP FOR PART NUMBERS ENDING WITH"B" B 1!�••V f. �' 12"(300 mm)MIN INSERTION STUBS AT TOP OF END CAP FOR PART NUMBERS ENDING WITH"T" I,�� f� uJ c w {:_ f END CAPS WITH A WELDED CROWN PLATE END WITH"C" j i I !' a7 I' w a Nj ; -Mt END CAPS WITH A PREFABRICATED WELDED STUB END WITH"IN" L .11 PART# STUB B C m m o� MANIFOLD STUB i 1 � MC3500IEPPOBT 33.21"(844 mm} --- / ail U 00 00 0 Pe I I MC35001EPP06B 6"(150 mm) --- 0.66"(17 mm) j ow MANIFOLD HEADER j , „�' / �� Z 1 MC35001EPPOBT 31.16"(791 mm) r.a? , o r I 8"(200 mm) , - MC35001EPPOBB 0.81"(21 mm) NOTE: ti �' MC3500IEPP1OT 29.04"(73Bmm} 11111111111, i'rr, THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND !//y�/ 10" 250 mm G ff j`�lll,I�p�I MC35001EPP10B ( ) --- 0.93"(24 mm) ' �' 2on" P MC3500IEPP12T 12"(300mm) 26.3fi"(670mm} --- �o _° UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES >" i MC3500IEPP12B --- 1.35"(34 mm) 0 w /' MANIFOLD HEADER MC3500IEPP15T 23.39"(594mm) CUSTOM PRECORED INVERTS ARE wmti W" NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN 15"(375 mm) ¢d m w `. MANIFOLD STUB MC3500IEPP15B 50"(38 mm) AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST. ,t m w ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN INVENTORIED MANIFOLDS INCLUDE Ce - _ MC35001EPP18TC ( �_� o MISINTERPRETATION. � �. 20.03"(509 mm) 12-24" 300-600 mm)SIZE ON SIZE a�.. . ■I - MC3500IEPP1BTW a 18"(450 mm) AND 15-48"(375-120D DS.mm) w , MC35001EPP1 BBC 1.77"(45 mm) ECCENTRIC MANIFOLDS.CUSTOM w w 12"(300 mm) H12"(300 mm) MC3500IEPP1BBW INVERT LOCATIONS ON THE MC-3500 m~ MIN SEPARATION '1 MC35001EPP24TC END CAP CUT IN THE FIELD ARE NOT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR MIN INSERTION 14.48"(368 mm) --- RECOMMENDED FOR PIPE SIZES MC35001EPP24TW 24"(600 mm) GREATER THAN 10"(250 mm).THE _� REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTZ MC3500IEPP24BC 2.Ofi"(52 mm) INVERT LOCATION IN COLUMN'S' 2g SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED MC3500IEPP24BW ARE THE HIGHEST POSSIBLE FOR eL PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE NOTE:MANIFOLD STUB MUST BE LAID HORIZONTAL MC35001EPP30BC 30"(750 mm) -- 2.75"(70 mm) THE PIPE SIZE. SHEET FOR A PROPER FIT IN END CAP OPENING. NOTE:ALL DIMENSIONS ARE NOMINAL STATE OF MINNESOTA. 5 OF 52 RYAN J. ANDERSON DATE 09/20/2022 LIC. NO. 55938 W THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I &S GROUP, Ce INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED p WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. - PROJECT O APPLE VALLEY SQUARE 7TH 0 ADDITION p IX CO APPLE VALLEY MINNESOTA REVISION SCHEDULE DATE DESCRIPTION BY 0 V OC O Um PROJECT NO. 16-19870 FILE NAME 19870 CO DETAILS 0 DRAWN BY LFO DESIGNED BY LFO/RJA Z REVIEWED BY RJA ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 07/18/2022 >I" CLIENT PROJECT NO. - 1 12 TITLE Q Z STORMTECH2 DETAILS J W CO Ce CN o SHEET a N C) di I— C 0 _ 2 3 - 0 J I I I I APPLE VALLEY SQUARE 7TH ADDITION EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (per Title No. 51976) Lot 2, Block 1, Apple Valley Square 4th Addition, Dakota County, Minnesota. Together with any easements as set forth in that certain Declaration, dated October 1, 1982, recorded November 12, 1982 as Document No. 611320; as -I amended by First Amendment to Declaration dated June 11, 1986, recorded June 30, 1986 as Document No. 732565 in the Office of the County Recorder in and for Dakota County, Minnesota. OWNERS/ DEVELOPERS: SURVEYOR: Apple Valley Minnesota Realty LLC ISG 7300 147th Street West 7900 International Drive VARIABLE WIDTH Suite 402 Suite 550 r, ,-,/ ,- - 1 / '7 / / 1- -, / Apple Valley, MN 55124 Minneapolis, MN 55425 // f- f- / f- I / 1 / / f- y 952-222-3939 952-426-0699 /`l/ I r__ -- lr /ir__r__— / ,,/-' / /1 rj ,- - I;--�T-' / /1 r-, im //r-//'/i / - AREA TABLE: Li\. 1/ / I /-, /-- I / // // // / ° Existing: xL- /-'I/ 1 .__ L_/ / / / /`7/_,,/__, / / / ` i/ L o Lot 2, Block 1 = 302,473 sq. ft. -6.94 acres C Proposed New Lot: FD MAG Nis IL 6� EAST 387.92 Lot 1, Block 1 = 279,783 sq. ft. 6.42 acres 'r' �f DRAINAGE AND UTILITY tASEMEm CHISE 'FOUND CHISELED" ' Lot 2, Block 1 = 22,690 sq. ft. - 0.52 acres El a_ I CHI�SEIc, or) .i 4 I I 179.50 ' �- r 11 1 r 208.42 EXISTING PROPERTY: [✓ 325.92 _ a 1. -EAST LINE LO 2, BLOCK 1 / 1 1 5 �' ZONED: RB - Retail Business FD MAG NAIL j CJ I 1 I Q !� APPLE VALLE SQUARE 4TH ADDITION MAG NAIL / EAST 295.00 Z. 1 I 'I /? (Per City of Apple Valley website) cc I � �, `Common Wall FD MAG NAI �� f I �1 °f -1— Building Setbacks > \ r2>� I 1 co I, Front= 50 feet :_ I I � c l�� Side = 15 feet � - � - / � - % 19 I / "1 / / r- - 1 `/ �1 � \ /I f-/A-// f- / 1 Q I n I / /I / / /-- 1' I-- - .1; Rear= 15feet 5 j /` / / r__ _ j �40 �--1 u /- /__ r__ _ / J Street = 30 feet C / - 1 l vi r I Parking Setbacks EAST 1 I y r� Front= 15 feet 32.00 ° ° ° / V 01 — ( ' /i / J ® DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EAGEMENT �// �=) ,IL I- Side = 5 feet A CI --r- , � 2uu.4L , ° ,\ `- Rear= 5 feet 1 °/ 1 / ( 1 I p�-�-- ; /_I ' I 1 1 I I� l I I Street = 20 feet I 6� % I 1 / / / 10 �L- I_ I I / ,,'� j -0--1 I o `-- / 1 U/9� / �� "\� r�/// / I / N \11 . . . /�� % I wH 1- 1 Sign// y\ BENCHMARK: r� _ I w I� I I I y r� Onsite benchmark is top nut of hydrant located on the west side of the parking lot, - % / o W I I i i TRAIL,DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT-�, N r I. 37.5' south and 40.5' east of the sw planter box corner. ❑ / ,1 /--I/' I�4` J 1 I �r PER DOCUMENT NO.3281486 `\\ `I \ f-\ Elev=955.12 (NAVD88). ��--1f .E ci / I,�I 1 / l'/ 7 DI 1 1 I I I \\ ' L I 1 (-. a) 6 /` / z' ; I A I I ''` ' `"- Offsite benchmark is MnDOT monument VALLEY, Elev=947.895 (NAVD88). o (Group Health Plan Inc.) CO % I I I I 0 4 1 C\___I I - I z 1 1 0o I I- I- FLOOD ZONE: O I j j I 0 I 0 — «I t1` The flood zone classification/limits depicted hereon, if any, are subject to map scale N �� p % I I 1 z i I.- I"' uncertainty. The surveyed property shown on this survey map is in Flood Zone X, W % I Z according to Flood Insurance Rate Map Community Panel No. 27037CO201E, o \� ,� published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, effective date I- w CD ., c /® December 2, 2011. FD 1/2" IRON h I RL3 24332 • N89°53'44"E�\- 1`'k - 75.00 ter; f` EAST z z / rE.-4- 20 :_) W:i6.T 11&5°.4� o) 0 ,__,_,r,� 1 \`�: 500`-: �� o BLOC/I' 11 , I �� VICINITY MAP ,� z / II 1 FOUND CHISELED"X"- �`� (NOT TO SCALE) o / I I \ r 1 - 1 \ C.SA.H. NO. 42 I L— / 11 0 1 �� ❑ / c0 I - ki c) ° ❑j �I/ l / / /I 7/— II o H I- _ — << — / / /T /-1/Z. \�` \\�` SITE Q t� �I 115 l / � ?C l�//mil/ I � - o L 1_ - -I 1 I - , O /- / / / N �� / r U I / -1 — _ ;A ' 131.0 _ — ,/ 153RQ ST 5082233'E < 1 �� 1 0 IDRIDRAINAG' AND UTILITY EASEMENT 156 7 N 100.57 m °° ❑ j / Q ° 1I 0r - - - - • I(In/ / " 1 I � Nilt cs 1 z-+I / // j 30.00 J1 J• 0 1- I LDRAINAG'1 D ILITY EANT 1(Ic I . /�/� u u c, _- I �D INAG�A LITY EAS'�Wy'T )__ H �v d.� CD �/ �i:Th...f4-51kfl ( I— Lc) 21.58 1fEAST 306.00N01 5948' F _ ( / 34.64 1 el---N- I o — — co°6c): Pi-. — 1414'!�V 932.��2-�� 1 I 1 I `O k.,: 1 - 1 ! 1 17) - - - - _ S89° J 11 I 1 / I " o �o/ SEC. 33, TWP. 115, RGE. 20 FD 1/2"RLS IR/j�3,NIJ D" / _ o C� o M I _ _ / ��?F� ® 1. y o City of Apple Valley, Dakota County, MN. 0 50 100 S'Y332L filA0 - 357.00 I �� CHISFI ED "X" b L . . 1 Z O O 0 =_== t �,X„ • • • Scale: In Feet O /I---;,, I,-, I,]r-r, /�� T-ram -�--r O co lin jf,// / �, / F,/f / CO f- /,-1 , / , I-- / LEGEND El INDICATES MAG NAIL SET OR WILL BE SET IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN (City ofApple Valley) STATUTES SECTION 505.021, SUBD. 10 DENOTES RESTRICTED ACCESS PER PLAT OF APPLE VALLEY SQUARE 4TH r / -T- // ADDITION AND THE DAKOTA COUNTY �l /I / // // / // // I /_i/_i / / / ` i/ I./ CONTIGUOUS PLAT ORDINANCE I I d EAST 1/4 CORNER BEARING NOTE: SEC. 33-T115-R20 For the purposes of this plat the east line of Lot 2, Block 1,APPLE VALLEY SQUARE 4TH ADDITION, Dakota County, Minnesota is ISG Iassumed to bear S00°06'16"E. CO-30 I I I I I l l l l i l / L �' I FBI I I I _ '� I 1 1 I 1`sl ! 1 1 N 1 I �� I 1_ ....,_ \ I I 1 1 �I� , _0(, m °i ,lit z,- yL Q / I ,, 1 �l `� ,,, , `991. '/ / 1 I O O O-O UT ,� —UT— UT 9S \ ,.. .t,_. LI 0 � / /� I I II 1 �'PAC pC pC 0 0 G 4- ' G G p l: \ I I 1 I ___. ___ ! 0 /______ / _ %/i i / — - - - - - 1 - - /immommosm-� i- '/.III IX / / a —'�IIt ; e:ee:e:4:"• 9 POPEYES • ■ ■ ■ 1 I i— �i �h o ,• •� % (�l \� - �J DIY' • 2,347 SQ. FT. • I- SCALE IN FEET 5 Ir „ v �• •�I� 1 O - - {,, I I I _ _ �• FFE = 954.85 • • •� >s cr, (::1,...> [I / \ , I \V, NA Ni 1. _III 1Ir� .'faK 1%/ /////Aw® .,J _ .C.- 0 I0 1 � °I I I 0 0 •' ,ems I III/ �' ° 7 1 �� 1 !MIN , iii \ .\ Ce 0 0 ° GM / I V \ 116 ° / / I I v I v ._: _, r 41:4 — I / / .;��_, � II / �� O : / u_ x /// / e A I, 77 1 1 1 i / , I II PROPOSED LOT LINE, TYP. 1 / I 1 1 \ / _ — 1 1 1\ —I` I I I _I_ l 1 i�� // / Yil I 1 1 1 1 I I, Q O I 1 �J �/ / - n I f/ / e �, EXISTING9 1 I I / , NOTE: / I / rZ I I I Sio) THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND \< k —\— / BURLINGTON / /if I II I �L / \L___;� _� __� / <1 s UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES ❑ I \ T1 I a I 1 "� / COAT FACTORY / I .. I �O V V I NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN >m 1 �} z / v I �/ FFE = 954.00' I I I IL. \ I ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT INCe I \ I C , 951 / I 1► I 1 I MISINTERPRETATION. I — / I I C I a �- / IA I / I I I �' � I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR C J 952 / \ I� 1 I J - }- - �� ;! / - - 1I REPORTWASPREPAREDBYMEORUNDERMYDIRECT/ 1 1av - « - - - o < ISUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED Z , 953 - I1 I 1 <<�- - - -{ I<< I - - I PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE -r---I / t \ < 'f- -f1 - - - RYANJ. ANDERSON\I I U �' I ( < ,....,401 iI 1�1 v - - - - /�% — - ` I ,I'�� w I DATE D9/2D/2D22 uc. No. 55938 W 1 F / I 1 1 a a �' .) /7 ri/ _ _ 1 / ) 1 I 954_ J O THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I &S GROUP, Ce / / / \ r7" , I I /I �� W � INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATEDI / + 1 7 1 / "T---- I ^ti WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. a s - I ! ' 11 - L _ / I I I I „I I I I I I I I I I I 1 In PROJECT 6, 6' //� 955 _ W ) : , I / D Z IAwv, Io a / I Ih 955 , . , — — / i5 ❑ <-19`° ) ,;955 ;a 1 1 I I I 0 1 '/ rn I I V C \ m 9SA, APPLE VALLEY 1 / EROSION CONTROL LEGEND �- I r ° / / _ I • SQUARE 7TH 0 1 — f o / I /� I a SYMBOL DESCRIPTION 4I 4- - I I �// �� II I V 1 I, �/ ( 1 I 1 1 1, ;�� ADDITION 1I Pc PERIMETER CONTROL I —I — � , 1 IX / \ - L II - - - - - « - - I I �_ / �' 11 1 1 ,1 - « -ra I \ _ - H_ =- I \ � - j ) - y II L -I- � - - - < — ... 0 �/��15 / I �U� �.Ji - « _ — , A< STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION APPLE VALLEY MINNESOTA I III j EXISTING ALDI / i` -I 1 �� REVISION SCHEDULE Z 1 ° FFE : 954.22 / \ �,� � _ _ _ i _ _ _ DATE DESCRIPTION BY L---- 4 / .411 0 L -I / J I � y m • O O O O O STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT a'I z / / 7� I 1 1 I N♦ iI pep/at nt 2 0000000 I \71 // // v, \ --,i- iv -v-1-I ----. 2 °- - (_7_,___,,,Ifcif I I / �-Utility EasementcedI'� erpoc.No.3128905 —1— __ _ _ — — < — — —+ CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA —I I I I p i - - --1 I -fi - -.< -I- 1.1 I - - - T / _ _� - - - - cr I I I / 1 1 1 J < -1 - -I- -1 I 1 0 - 1- - 'i / 1 I - -II < l i I 10 I Um 1- -1-'__,__,m_,_ ° ` , — — — — ,i1 f j — d- - - - - 4R i -1— �— — — — I .--/1 EXISTING DRAINAGE ARROW — 1 I I I I - i i FasemenT e�/fit — — — I — — — — — 1 -� r �� y ° p P A ' I \I I I (4ti/ityEasement PROJECT NO. 1 6-1 9870 F _ T — V -� I per plat � _ < — -— » — ys�_ » » — Utility Easement I 1 v I / FILE NAME 19870 Cl SWPPP — _ _ — 0 \ — — — — — �„ per Doc.No. — — , I V I / PROPOSED DRAINAGE ARROW DRAWN BY LFO 0 h - _ - - < -I- _ - - - - - _ - _ - >> z- - - - >> >1_ t / I I 1 - - I �< + - . _ T T - 11 � (, / 1 �I I I DESIGNED BY LFO/RJA Z 7 1 1 i I ,,,� -I- -1- 1 _ F -1- - I 1- < -1-I - < �� () I `1 11 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 REVIEWED BY RJA 01 I 1- -I - l_ - - - - - J >- 1 II© © I 101 EXISTING CONTOUR(MINOR INTERVAL) ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 07/18/2022 — _ \ I i 40,___ __ . 95a _ UTL - UTL -- 1i 1 i CLIENT PROJECT NO.952 _ UTL— o l o 0 0 �— o --- 1_ UTL _J UTL --6' UTL - ---UTL -j- - UTL---- �� UTLUTL --- Ulf --r- �_ 1 UTL -UTL - \ \V �' �h�-=:..= �:_e =�° "J - - -UTL - UE UE UE UE \ UE UE�--��, �� _ ' < ----- UE - -- UE UE UE --- UE UE - �y� -953 U� ✓ UE i —100- EXISTING CONTOUR(MAJOR INTERVAL) TITLE sTh _ — �� - i oh 952 • Z - \ - - 951 UE - UE ---'�"- UE UE UE --__` -- UE -��- UE i�/ UE�--="---0) - UE -- / UE - - UE - I % _ s —� �c ��% ��% 101 PROPOSED CONTOUR(MINOR INTERVAL) GRADING & EROSION CONTROL QUANTITIES EROSION 2 ITEM NO. UNITS QUANTITY 100 PROPOSED CONTOUR(MAJOR INTERVAL) CONTROL PLAN 1.53RD STREET PROPOSED STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH 15 UNI CO STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT EACH 1 PERIMETER CONTROL CAN BE SILT FENCE OR SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG. Ce N 80 FOOT R/W SEE SITE RESTORATION PLAN FOR FINAL TURF ESTABLISHMENT. lm o PERIMETER CONTROL LF 1,575 NOTE:SWPPP COVERAGE INCLUDES ELECTRIC,GAS,TELEPHONE,AND CABLE INSTALLATION.EACH SHEET CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA EACH 1 COMPANY OR THEIR SUBCONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO FOLLOW THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS oQUANTITIES ARE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CONSTRUCTION SWPPP INCLUDING PROVIDING THEIR OWN RESTORATION IF INSTALLATION OCCURS AFTER PRIMARY C1 = 10 — STORMWATER PERMIT.NO GUARANTEE IS MADE TO THE ACTUAL QUANTITIES REQUIRED. INSTALLATION OF SEEDING/SODDING/MULCHING DURING CONSTRUCTION OF EACH UTILITY. 0 J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I / IV -I- � I\I -i- I -i I - I -I- I -I- - - I I I I I I I I / / ./1/ TH — � r I - REMOVAL LEGEND , : :/ •I I 1 1 �s� I I I I 1 1 1 % � / ►:iiif�j� 1oN I 1 1 1 / Z SYMBOL DESCRIPTION / - 7 1 1 1' T 1 ' r r r 4•-•-r I I a m o Q"c taC g I IIff-20- ,. I Wae REMOVE BITUMINOUS TUMINOUS �/ / J/ I - 1 1 I I m s r i-ri PAVEMENT h / (L-limi fi 1\ REMOVELIGHTPOL I i \\\\ REMOVE CONCRETE WALK 1 L.. >/ �•:�� I /1 0 i - / / ��, r— } . J d _ /0„.41 , REMOVE PAVEMENT STRIPING / / 'jam /`/ f /REMOVE STORM STRUCTURE / \ 15 REMOVE LANDSCAPING t IC) tf) cn �i I i v /1 ( / (IN: I 1 1 i V 1 ( a CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING PAVEMENT SECTION 0 I ` 1 1 1 1 r AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES.� I / r I ; 1 ! / /1 PAVEMENT REMOVALS SHALL INCLUDE FULL DEPTH 1 / / W 1 F SAWCUT AND SECTION REMOVAL. / 1 I I 1 A� U€ _- o° / I I / / ,,,, \C) ' OC < o 0 o GM �� \ � � V / — 0 m I \C ° / / I , I _ REMOVE STORM SEWER / _ ° / / y , BENCHMARK- 955.12 rt pi/ / , -. /1 (TOP NUT OF FIRE HYDRANT) I liii ' r_ __+___ ZA / N , PROTECT STORM SEWER U. /7 7 ,0 ►' I // I ) 1 I / STORM MH 4 �//`/lor9 7 1 I v I ' 1 ) ll RIM=952.64 �� /1 — —� I + -I- - 1 \ C'-' t 0 / ,c) I 1 "�J a/ / I(S)-943.51 �� I I \ /�/ 4 r/ EXISTING ,r / I(E)=945.59 � 1 1 1 1 I I IEM=—M NOTE: k H /1 ►�� ell I I I I c/ THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND / BURLINGTON /(i r 1 1 I \I i_ _ ' �. C 0 / � «__ I 1 � UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES >m COAT FACTORY / I \ Imo— 1 v I NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN � FFE = 954.00' I I 1 I STORM Ivy \-- 2 I ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN I C / 951 / / �� 1 I RIM=952.43 PROTECT STORM SEWER 1 —► — — �� I MISINTERPRETATION. C‘ I _ / I1=SEALED I STORM MI- _ ii/ i RIM=953.08 -/ Q �- I I I(W)-946.73 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR C J 952 \ VII I I \ I 1 1 1 - I« -I- - I(N)=946.75- - ) I - REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT Z I - « - - - Et SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ,� [953/ / - I - - - - I _ << - - - -Jr I - - _ - a I PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE �- r- ---[ k /'� / t I I- �< fi I- 1 1 < �I STATE OF MINNESOTA. 2 � - 7 I 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 - - RYAN J. ANDERSON Q I / II I 1 1 I I ( '�1 II" � I L1 I I I I I I � � I I I � I ` _ \ / REMOVE AND REPLACE TRAFFIC SIGN, TYP. \ I I I J 1 12 Z t - / I I�I STORM MH - - - I t p / ,-''1 RIM=951.91 �' W - - \ / \ I ,'I _ / REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT, TYP. I ( DATE 09/20/2022 LIC. NO. 55938 / / I 1 I(N)-946.04 - - a N / I / / 1 H I 1 I(W)=946.04 - - I I / � � � 954- -� 1 w O THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, I:e / I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 /I I I � INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED / / + 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 I ^ti WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. a / 1 -I I � - - L - � - I — / 1 jai - ❑/ / I I T T I 1 I I I I /1 T I I I I I I 1 - I / HI L 1 - - - - , 1=1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 ___Z/11 1 I k PROJECT Is cr' 1 / EXISTING WATER MAIN + I 955 / W `�+ _ _ 1 / j 11 1 I z 1 I (FIELD VERIFY MATERIAL, SIZE, AND DEPTH) / -.fo I �-- 7 955 ,A, b ❑ �95055 / � I I 1 I � I C CY): / / I 1v REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER TYP. REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER TYP. APPLE VALLEY A I 1 - - 1I, "I -_____ ----- r ,/ / �►I ►� -► SQUARE 7TH 0 �1 / / I STORM MH II 11 � / I I I lil - / I 1 �7 RIM=953.53 I, � I I' -� - r‘ II / \ I1 1 1 ; I �� / I(W)=948.07 ADDITION / I I C<< - - - - - STORM I(S)-948.19 II4 MH II - - - - ice -- < — - - APPLE VALLEY MINNESOTA _�1 1 I RIM=952.25 _ �< -1- - 1 1 1 A Cn ^ I 1 ( - 0 III EXISTING ALDI / IG)=9'4.9512"PVC , - / / I �_T \ 1 REVISION SCHEDULE 1- I ° FFE : 954.22 / 1 ri'I I - - - - - - i - ÷ - - - - -) EXISTING PROPERTY LINE TYP. DATE DESCRIPTION BY 0 - -I i 1 Ii/t ,> NityEa nt I -< 1/ i�� I i �I 1 i I plat c) 0 rzH co 17 I / SAN MH v �- I--- - J---I--�I---i-f- y I(W)=949.11 /` I // // �-Uti/ityEasen I(E)=945.69 8"PVC J - F- - - 1 - -I r I - - -I I 1`' 1 p I(S)945.64 8 PVC fr - - - --r 1 I 1- -1fi = < —/' —I I T < -I — -I- — -- -1 I 1 0 — 1 Um I - -ii < 1 1 I I I 1 i l _ 7,- 1- -e-, - 1-1-4 c''-- FR-'7- ° ,....„.7.-- -1-ikl_ 1 f 74- - 1- —1— —r —r— I I \& yFsemenTpe�p/�f - - - I - - - - � I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 R\1 limy Easement 9 � 1 -)-I -� - - _ J'T _ I PROJECT NO. 6-�9870 - -" I fv I 1 V /per tat PROTECT EXISTING SANITARY SERVICE, TYP. ---?>-�_ys�- » » - - Uti/it/Easement I I I v 1 FILE NAME 19870 C2 EXIST - < _ o _ _ _ erDoc.No. Q DI - - - _ < -I _ _\ _ _ »1z- P - - » > � / I I 1 �� DRAWN BY LFO V -1- 1 I1 �< + -I_ _ 1 T T T - I I �I -1- / I I I I I �, DESIGNED BY LFO/RJAZ I7 1 - �= -I- _I 1 F -1- - 1 1- < -1- — c I Ti-J - 5 - - - - - - 11 - - - - ' 1 1 1 a` I REVIEWED BY RJA / / / - - /� �\ - - - - J L' 1IT ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 07/18/202 >m 2 S rn - 954 = UTL--r---1 1 _-_LL - 1 1I _ — TENT PROJECT NO. rot 0 I 0 O O O I — CLIENT —952 -u ---um- 1 �� —— l —— ___ UTL —J --— UTL - —UTL — I— UTL———— JUTL UTL --- — —UTL I UTL —--—UTL--- UE -, UTL _- UE UE UE UE U UE UE E ——— UE UE `off _953 UE% 'C �� L' - �y� UE U�- — cI - - �h 952 NTITLE I _ / �� UE — UE — .� UE - UE -- UE UE -_�_` — UE —_ 7________<(:7_______e,E / EXISTING SITE j �► s —!C AND REMOVAL 2 9 153RD STREET I PLAN —IW OC N SO FOOT RAW 0 30 60 SHEET a N a) . . a) _ _ . . . SCALE IN FEET C2 - 1 0 I I I I I I X �= 0 ,, N / 159 , 4 t . (- '‘'l ' , / Ii //°_/ I t. / ISTRIPING PER MN/ I MUTCD STANDARDS TYP. �° wat ID / • - / l: I- 0 p / �► _ I:e m -"") / -•-•-•-:-•-•-•-•I•-.-•-.-.-.-.- I_ = W N . . . . . . .❖.❖.❖.❖= • I�I� off, • POPEYES • 0 �J • ��I �4' 2,347 SQ. FT. • SCALE IN FEET CO - - / [ 1 ' ,� • FFE = 954.85 • 15 a - - - I I �`� ffi• .•.•.•.•.•.•.abb••••••••,�t 0 0 q)°) I el) .(-1 0 ° ° ° / w Q 0 0 \I ///////////////////r//////t to �1 Ce 0 0 0 o GM/ / L\ II" � 0 ° t —1— °/ / - - - Um A / // i' 4 �I I - or,. PROPOSED LOT LINE, TYP. / , I -V/ 1 1 1 HrHTTJ1 NOTE. Z IV. 0 THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND BURLINGTON `I—" 11 • �/ / 1 -1 a UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES >m / COAT FACTORY / I Imo— I 10' NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN FFE = 954.00' i I 0 ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT INIX • / I—► I MISINTERPRETATION. — 10 1'WIDE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT PATCH TO J II I I I 1 1 1 1 1 LI • ALLOW FOR CURB ISLAND CONSTRUCTION, / I� I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR / < / I I REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT Z (MATCH EXISTING SECTION) y / 1 SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED _ _ I I _ _ / "�t.--�---I •• I t I r� �(.� PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE J / I f l STATE OF MINNESOTA. 2 �/ - - - - RYAN J. ANDERSON y Q �J d I / 1 _ I I / � � J < _I- - / B618 CURB& GUTTER, TYP. / 1 3 0 / --'I -1'WIDE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT PATCHW F / (REFER TO DETAILS) I - DATE 09/20/2022 uc. NO. 55938 / I- � (MATCH EXISTING SECTION) 1 Ce mOTHIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I &S GROUP, � I 1 W INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED - - / / W ^ti WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. a / a < �/ I I PAVEMENT LEGEND --' 1 II I I I I I I I 1 I I I Id 'Hz PROJECT / / I 0 . � SYMBOL DESCRIPTION 0- 20� I . o - �� - - - / / B618 CURB &GUTTER TYP. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT / B618 CURB &GUTTER, TYP. APPLE VALLEY { / (REFER TO DETAILS) (REFER TO DETAILS) fl _ / ► —► 1'WIDE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT PATCH SQUARE 7TH 0 CONCRETE PAVEMENT rAN 1 I 1 (MATCH EXISTING SECTION) p ® 1 1 11 ADDITION - - - - / O � IX / ,1 RESTRIPE ALL DISTURBED SITE SUMMARY i .1 1p I - - � - - I 1 10 =\ -- — — — PARKING STALLS WITH 4" PAINT. PROJECT 7575 153RD STREET WEST APPLE VALLEY MINNESOTA --1- ~- 5�"- / 15 / , MATCH EXISTING STRIPING Z � � 0 ALDI ii4 � I I 1 i 1 � ADDRESS/LOCATION: APPLE VALLEY,MINNESOTA 55124 N CONFIGURATION, TYP. REVISION SCHEDULE I FFE EXISTING954.22 / -4— - - i - - - DATE DESCRIPTION BY - - \- / I- �� ZONING: RB,RETAIL BUSINESS 0 ,,-Utility E.. nt i / / I perp/at (1) VI — t 0 o / IT I ,+ I I I I 1-- - -- � - ----1--;1--+- PARKING CALCULATIONS I 7 // ,-Utility Easement Vacated A I II \tv Ce i erpoc.No.3128105 I —I ' p - 1 1---t--- • - I LAND USE CLASSIFICATION(LOT 2) RETAIL STORE(S) I I / I I I� I 0 - fi / I i I i 10 PARKING SPACES REQUIRED 1 SPACE PER 150 SF UP TO 20,000 SF, ° I O � (155.379 0-RETAIL STORE) THEN 1 SPACE PER 200 SF U - + �' o — o - - - - - - � J — � - - — � � L —I— - - - - o �'� R\I\ G I GROSS FLOOR ACTUAL RETAIL AREA I I ti/ity Easement perp/at — I I I Utility Easement �� I7I perp/atAREA[SF] [SF] PROJECT NO. 16-198701- T -0— -- - -0 - - - - _ _ _ ay Easement I ALDI 12,453 FILE NAME 19870 C3 SITE \\ — _ _ _ _ // per Doc.No. I �� 0 _ _ _ _ 1� -- I i 1 BURLINGTON 55,162 50,148 DRAWN BY LFO -1__ _ _ T T - //\ I I BURLINGTON UNUSED-FUTURE 11,126 10,115 DESIGNED BY LFO/RJA I- -t 1- .I 0 I �` I REVIEWED BY RJA v1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1- -1 - -.I_ 1 I I I I I / H J I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 I APPLE VALLEY SQUARE(TOTAL) 72,716 �I ) II . . IIIii .II >m ® ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 07/18/2022 (20,000/150) +[(72,716-20,000)/200]_ 0 0 0 0d 0 0 0 ® REQUIRED PARKING SPACES 397 CLIENT PROJECT NO. IX LAND USE CLASSIFICATION(LOT 1) CLASS II RESTAURANT TITLE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED 1 SPACE PER 3 SEATS / �� 0 /� /6j /O (155.379 P 2) 24 TOTAL SEATS/3= PARKING SPACES REQUIRED2 8 SITE PLAN J 1�3RD STREET SITE TOTALS W REQUIRED PROVIDED cEi Ce 80 FOOT R/W LOT 1 8 18 LOT 2 397 322 SHEET N Q Ed,_ TOTAL 405 340 C3 - 1 0 o ,_ ___ J G_ 1 I I 1 1 1 1 Xm yt 1, I:- . . N/ II rH + TELEPHONE I INTERNET LINE \ I I I o I I I -8 / k-' . R -R=9(5S3T4-70 t - I I 7- � � o z \ 94980 (12") P-7 aI� 20- • 1=949.27 (12") P-7 W / 6" DUCTILE IRON WATER SERVIC/E v 1Ank)vI 1=949.27 (12") P-6 I j m 0 UT UT UT UTGAS LINE a E. 6" DUCTILE IRON WATER SERVICE G Pe7j" > 1 G - - /- - - - l: CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER MAIN \ / P-6(12")-.-1,,,,,, ST 6 CI) - \ WWI ' R=954.88 1-6 TEE1=949.22 (12")P-6 p / I `1 ,?t - / iii/ 1=946.50(12 )ADS �/ r\I // (REFER TO / I / _ �_-�_-� _•_-_-_-0 '- ' a \ li / cc / `-- 0 30 60 / / f W" BLDG BLDG••••••••••i_: o 1=951.77 • 1=951.77 . . . _ / / - 1 - 1 o ,347 �. FT. / / LIJ _ �� BLDG II ts� SCALE IN FEET (n _ FF BLDG)/ / I►� I �- I I I P. \ I I 1=947.95 0 . STORMTECH MC3500 Z - - )- � 95 ► tifjj;•-, �. (SEE DETAILS) IHYDRANT ASSEMBLY ��!1, ' r�rrr� - - j ST-3O/�\ 6" DUCTILE IRON WATER SERVICE `.� " ,o - 0 !I /iiiix1-////ii Pill SP-6 6" r1;\ J 1=947.60 (12") P-2 4 �� 0 1 / / w 1-6"x 6"x 6"TEE C•, < < , SP-5 (6° P-5 (12") Q� 9 \5T2) =946.50 (12")ADS 1/ w Q * ► S __ 1 Ce v REFER TO DETAILS) Y€ �M � v ,S-2 _ (8") ST-4 - 0/ I\ I ; I R=954.34 v SP 4 R=953.65 _ / �, _ _ I R-954.03 - - �� °/ / y I 12 PEX WATER SERVICE 1=950.99(8")SP-2 m (ST 5 1=947.69 (12") P-3 li - O / ~' 1-CORPORATION STOP 1=950.99 8" SP-1 R=953.55 _ „ I I \=947.50 (12 ) P 1( ) _ 1=948.53 (12 ) P-5 s r- ' 194S.00(12 ) P 5 1=947.69 12" P-2 7/// / _ ( ) I //A ///� I (C.0. 1 ST-1) INSULATE SANITARY PIPE - 1 I i STORM MH �, 1 1 I R-954.60 v R=954.19 - 0 • RIM=952.64 - -0 - - I (SEE DETAIL) 1=951.42 (6")SP-5 I 1=947.18(12") P-1 } cl 0 _ (S) 9 3 5 /� 1951.42 (8 )SP-4 I I=947.08(12 ) P EX(S) Eal_ x (,,i,, EXISTING I(E)=945.59 / NOTE: ', / / ! Z I 6 / THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND BURLINGTON `U 1 1I I 1 • ° -�"-- -TRANSFORMER& PAD I UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES >m / COAT FACTORY / I Imo- 1 v NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN 1 / / I 10 (COORDINATE WITH DAKOTA ELECTRICAL) v - - FFE = 954.00' 1 1 1 I I STORM MH I PROPOSED LOT LINE, TYP. ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT INCe • 1� 1 I RIM 952.43 I MISINTERPRETATION. 1 1 1=SEALED c STORM MH d rim1I► m I RIM=953.08 _ _ I �Y n I - I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR P / I(W)-946.73 I� 1� I I - << }- - I(N)=946.75 I REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT Z /./I� 1 I v _- - « - - - I SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ,'•r / 177 - - - =--r-� • / I HI t - _ « -- - - I aI PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE r < -- � � STATE OF MINNESOTA. °/ I, , _LI I 2 1 1 _ 1ikl RYAN J. ANDERSON _z Z -I < I / I 1.-1I STORMMH v - - - - o/� I 1 '1 RIM=951.91 CRITICAL CROSSING (SANITARY OVER STORM) I -�, W - - I% / - �R I�� I I(N)=946.04 SAN INV= 949.67 DATE 09/20/2022 uc. NO. 55938 / 1 Ce I I(W)=946.04 STM TOP= 947.47 -�� THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I &S GROUP, / r� I a 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � 1 W c) INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED W I 1 PROTECT EXISTING UTILITIES 1 1 1 1 WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. a < I ° 1 .. -T c rr 1 - I I 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I I PROJECT 1 I I _ Z I 1G (.) c, 0/ I 1 1 1 . 0 I O // I v PRIVATE SANITARY SERVICE m CRITICAL CROSSING (SANITARY OVER STORM) APPLE VALLEY I__ SAN INV=948.04 cL - STMTOP= 947.59 SQUARE 7TH V 1PROTECT EXISTING UTILITIES STORMMH Iii II 1 I RIM=953.53 v - ADDITION NT==11-- / II II I I - - I(w)-948.07 0 �/ 11 / c ��- - - _ - _ « I(S)=948.19 IX - - L -I 1 m < - - _ - _ « I I- I - _ - - < I I I / 11 p 1 _ - « - - -- STORM MHL i 0 _� I I _J-1 - T' < COORDINATE ELECTRICAL LINE APPLE VALLEY MINNESOTA / - RIM=952.25 � -I_ < II INSTALL WITH DAKOTA ELECTRICAL Z I 1 EXISTING ALDI / I(=) 944.9512"PVC I i I REVISION SCHEDULE - I / FFE : 954.22 / J - 1,-7I _ ( _ _ STORM DRAIN PIPE SCHEDULE DATE DESCRIPTION BY I I � / )7 I I . � m 0 - - - I �r t;i;ty Ea nt I I « / / T I r1 I erp/at INLET DRAIN PIPE PIPEPIPE PIPE / u � � CONNECT EXISTING SERVICE TO S-1 PIPE DRAIN NLE OUTLET MATERIAL 0 - I C� �' i 1 / IV i� NO. FROM ELEVATION TO ELEVATION SIZE (IN) CLASS GRADE LENGTH (FT) I I I I 1 /� SAN MH f I �� I--- -�1-i-±--� / (CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY DEPTH & LOCATION) Ce -I 7 - I / // �-Utility I(E)=945.69 8"PVC - - I - 1- * - I - - 0.55% I / '� e�Doc. * _ 1 - -�� P-1 ST-2 947.50 ST-1 947.18 12 HDPE DUAL WALL TYPE S 59 p I(S)945.64 8 PVC i - -- - -- - < - - I- \ _ I / _ _ _ _ _ _ 7 �- r-- � _ r--1fi -- - -•< -_ I I I I 1, - , , , , �I - < -I - -I- - - - < SP EX(E)(8")- P-2 ST-4 947.69 ST-3 947.60 12 HDPE DUAL WALL TYPE S 0.45% 19 0 n- I „ /// //////// ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' , ////////////////// 1 - -1 < EX (8") 1 1 ° / 1 1 S (� P-3 RL-1 947.78 ST-4 947.69 12 PVC SCH 40 0.30% 31LL SANITARY SEWER PIPE SCHEDULE t-�'�- - I - - - - -1- f I� 1 1 �\, Usc L S-1 -� P-4 RL-2 947.89 RL-1 947.78 12 PVC SCH40 0.30% 34 7 ' 7 1 1 Via PROJECT NO. 6-�9870 per R=951.54 P-5 ST-5 949.00 ST-4 948.53 12 HDPE DUAL WALL TYPES 0.50% 93 PIPE DRAIN INLET DRAIN OUTLET PIPE PIPE PIPE PIPE I I 1=947.61 (8")SP-1 FILE NAME 19870 C3 UTILITY MATERIAL 0 I NO. FROM ELEVATION TO ELEVATION SIZE CLASS GRADE LENGTH (FT) I_ - - ,4_- - (1 I I 1 I 1=947.09 (8")SP EX(E) P-6 ST-7 949.27 ST-6 949.22 12 HDPE DUAL WALL TYPE S 0.50% 11 DRAWN BY LFO 1=947.09 (8")SP EX(W)' DESIGNED BY LFO/RJA Z SP-1 S-2 950.99 S 1 947.61 8" PVC SDR-35 1.05% 322 < _ A - �.� - I I I I I I I IP-7 ST-8 949.80 ST-7 949.27 12 HDPE DUAL WALL TYPES 0.45% 118 - - I - - n I 1 - I / REVIEWED BY RJA SP-2 WYE 951.36 S-2 950.99 8" PVC SDR-35 0.52% 71 - - - - J - - - I I I © ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 07/18/2022 >m 1 . I 1 1 1 I I, d I _ -I UTL -�� ' STORM DRAIN STRUCTURE SCHEDULE CLIENT PROJECT NO. SP-3 BLDG 951.77 WYE 951.35 6" PVC SDR-35 2.00% 210 I _-UTL__(,)= UTLCe -- FL UTL---- UTL UTL - U V-�--- ® J SP-4 C.O. 1 951.42 WYE 951.36 8" PVC SDR-35 0.52% 11 I - U _ --- UE UE -- UE UE'� UE -__- UE STRUCTURE STRUCTURE STRUCTURE STRUCTURE PAY HEIGHT *TOP OF CASTING INVERT OUTLET V I - UE UE NO. TYPE SIZE (IN) CASTING FT) TITLE SP-5 S-GREASE TRAP 951.44 C.O.-1 951.42 6" PVC SDR-35 0.52% 4 MATERIAL (LN ELEVATION ELEVATION PIPE Z - UE -- \ SP-6 BLDG 951.77 S-GREASE TRAP 951.69 6" PVC SDR-35 2.00% 4 UE UE --- -- UE ST-1 MnDOT 4020 48 0 RC NEENAH R-2557-A4 7.12 954.19 947.08 P-EX(S) ST-2 MnDOT 4020 48 0 RC NEENAH R-1792-KL 6.68 954.03 947.36 P-1 2 UTILITY PLAN _ SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURE SCHEDULE ST-3 MnDOT4020 480 RC NEENAH R-2502 6.21 953.81 947.60 ADS STRUCTURE STRUCTURE STRUCTURE STRUCTURE PAY HEIGHT TOP OF CASTING INVERT OUTLET ST-4 CATCH BASIN(TYPE 1) 36 x 24 RC NEENAH R-3067-VB 6.04 953.65 947.61 P-2 LLI NO. TYPE SIZE (IN) MATERIAL CASTING (LN FT) ELEVATION ELEVATION PIPE ST-5 CATCH BASIN(TYPE 1) 36 x 24 RC NEENAH R 3067 V 4.55 953.55 949.00 P 5 CeeEi eN C.O.-1 CLEANOUT 8 0 Reinforced Concrete OVERFLOW GRATE STANDARD STANDARD 3.18 954.60 951.42 SP-4 ST-6 MnDOT 4020 48 0 RC NEENAH R-2502 8.38 954.88 946.50 ADS o SHEET a c, S-1 MnDOT 4007C 48 0 RC NEENAH R1733"SANITARY SEWER"STAMP SELF CLEANING PICK HOLES 4.45 951.54 947.09 SP EX(W) ST-7 MnDOT 4020 48 0 RC NEENAH R-2502 4.13 953.40 949.27 P-6 ~ S-2 MnDOT 4007C 48 0 RC NEENAH R1733"SANITARY SEWER"STAMP SELF CLEANING PICK HOLES 4.00 954.34 950.34 SP-1 C 3 2 0 ,_ o ST 8 MnDOT 4020 48 0 RC NEENAH R 2502 3.50 953.30 949.80 P 7 o *TOP OF CASTING ELEVATIONS ON CURB STYLE CATCH BASINS=TOP BACK OF CURB BOX,NOT GUTTER ELEVATION 0_ I I I I I I I I 1,1 I F � - � -II- � -I - �_ il L �: ' / -� � � � I � - L I I I I I 1 1 PLANT SCHEDULE �q�11 1 1 I I I I j .G7 PLANTING NOTES TREES CODEQTY BOTANICAL/COMMON NAME SIZE ROOT / 1 I \ u 1 1 i / 1 4 \ I I 1 1 19 1 FOOTRINGS,TE ETC WITHN OF ALL LOCATIONS UTILITIES PROPINES, DUCTS,OSED LANDSCAPE DELITS,EMENTS (F0 ENCE, • �I 5 ( CO 4 CELTIS OCCIDENTALIS 2.5"CAL B&B4_,/ I 20-� �, O FOOTINGS, TREE ROOTBALLS, ETC.). CONTRACTOR SHALL REPORT ANY COMMON HACKBERRY - v = DISCREPANCIES TO OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO CONTINUING WORK. OZ Ni 2. SAVE AND PROTECT ALL EXISTING TREES NOT NOTED TO BE REMOVED. GINKGO BILOBA'AUTUMN GOLD'TM ire y\ 3 FROM PLANTING PEMOVE ALL STS AND BEDS PRIOR TO BACKTRUCTION DEBRIS AND FIL ING WITHLS OPLANTUS OING M X PLANT GROWTH• • GA 12 AUTUMN GOLD MAIDENHAIR TREE2.5"CAL B&B \ • / 4. REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR TOPSOIL REQUIREMENTS. U\ 01G 5. REFER TO PLANTING AND SITE DETAILS FOR AMENDED SOIL DEPTH IN PLANTING ,I \ •° / �;r BEDS AND SURROUNDING TREES. REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR MIX TYPE. MALUS X'SPRING SNOW' Mil- - - v °� / �� I I- 6. FIELD STAKE PLANTINGS ACCORDING TO PLAN. OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE SHALL • MS 6 2.5"CAL B&B I11CU � lq - - - - �, %1 Mr 1 SPRING SNOW CRABAPPLE � I - �;�� APPROVE ALL PLANT LOCATIONS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. OWNER'SCe . , I� (2)GA o .� % re annn�I•I•I•I••�w•��•�••P•ali_�nn . ,` �� REPRESENTATIVE RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REVISE PLANTING LAYOUT AT TIME OF ill * III •°' c I �� '• • POPEYES • •• Vz INSTALLATION. �/ r• )1°17// ♦• Ili^ ■ om • � / 7. ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE TRUE TO THEIR SCIENTIFIC NAME AND SIZE AS (2)GA l-IIIµ v 2,347 •SQ. FT. •Q d _ _ INDICATED IN THE PLANT SCHEDULE. CO - • FFE = 954.85 • % 8. IF DISCREPANCIES EXIST BETWEEN THE NUMBER OF PLANTS DRAWN ON THE I r- I ► -\� �i • • • • • • ' ices-•a / Z 1. �• -•-•-•.•�•.•••• • • • • • • _ PLANTING PLAN AND THE NUMBER OF PLANTS IN THE SCHEDULE, THE PLANTING PLAN 11 v i�1� Si • •••••••••••••A... i j SHALL GOVERN. r�� I �� c e 9. ANY PROPOSED SUBSTITUTIONS OF PLANT SPECIES SHALL BE MADE WITH PLANTS OF Q I I (1)MS �'��, �� I �� EQUIVALENT OVERALL FORM, HEIGHT, BRANCHING HABIT, FLOWER, LEAF, COLOR, 111) /III°(. .\I ///////////////////e'/////iC�®) JFRUIT AND CULTURE AND ONLY AFTER WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE OWNER'SRESTORATION SCHEDULE 1 1 III 1 V / mir, ,, iII'k.c 4 REPRESENTATIVE. GROUND COVERS QTY BOTANICAL/COMMON NAME W . I 1 MS I/ O C '. � IN I 10. ALL PLANT MATERIALS MUST CONFORM TO AMERICAN STANDARDS FOR NURSERY a. •' a'. •' '. BUFF LANDSCAPE GRAVEL / J , J v STOCK (ANSI Z60.1), LATEST EDITION PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF IX •a� a� Q a 2,451 SF / )\ i v NURSERYMEN, WASHINGTON D.C. LARGER SIZED PLANT MATERIALS OF THE SPECIES - CD:,17.C:,;t3 C:Q,17.C LANDSCAPE GRAVEL / I I �� _ - - - LISTED MAY BE USED IF THE STOCK CONFORMS TO ANSI Z60.1. 0 w W W W _ 1 11. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE GUARANTEED BY THE CONTRACTOR TO BE IN A LIVE �' 1 108 SF TURF SOD - - - - AND HEALTHY GROWING CONDITION FOR ONE FULL GROWING SEASON (ONE IJ- ,r-� YEAR) W w W W DROUGHT TOLERANT FESCUE BLEND �'; I AFTER FINAL PROJECT ACCEPTANCE OR SHALL BE REPLACED BY THE CONTRACTOR / - Ar; ` ' ?I V I FREE OF CHARGE WITH THE SAME GRADE AND SPECIES. -'•' J �1 v 12. ALL TREES SHALL HAVE A STRONG CENTRAL LEADER. ANY TREES DEEMED NOT TO V - - - HAVE A STRONG CENTRAL LEADER SHALL BE REJECTED. v / 13. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DAMAGE DUE TO CONSTRUCTIONO r DO NOT CUT PRIMARY LEADER.ALL TREES _ �'�V I - OPERATIONS. ANY AREAS THAT ARE DISTURBED SHALL BE RESTORED TO ITS SHALL HAVE A STRONG(CENTRAL) .Q*>`'� / I ORIGINAL CONDITION AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. NOTE: `� 2 GA I Z DOMINATE LEADER I � �� THE CLARITY OF THESE PLANS DEPEND �`�� I 11 14. PROVIDE BUFF LANDSCAPE GRAVEL MULCH SURROUNDING ALL PROPOSED TREES (5' O PRUNE ALL BROKEN, DAMAGED,OR RUBBING I -- --- I 0)AND WITHIN PLANTING BEDS TO A 3" MINIMUM DEPTH AS SHOWN IN TREE UPON COLOR COPIES. IF THIS TEXT DOES >m LIMBS AND BRANCHES IMMEDIATELY AFTER / I v PLANTING DETAIL. PROVIDE UNDERLAYMENT SUCH AS PLASTIC SHEET OR NOT APPEAR IN COLOR, THIS IS NOT AN / v - - - - LANDSCAPE FABRIC. APPLY PRE EMERGENT TO ALL PLANTING BEDS PRIOR TO PLANTING ALL PRUNING CUTS CLEAN AT 90 I I ORIGINAL PLAN SET AND MAY RESULT IN / I �� I I - 2 GA MULCHING. REFER TO PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS. MISINTERPRETATION. TIE NYLON STRAP AROUND TRUNK AS SHOWN /�� I 1 I ( ) 15. MULCHING MATERIAL SHALL BE BUFF LANDSCAPE GRAVEL MULCH, IN 1-2" DIA. 3" J / I MINIMUM DEPTH. MINIMUM DEPTHS AT LOCATIONS INDICATED ON DRAWINGS. I:e I • II n fir I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR (De 112"WIDE NYLON STRAPPING GREEN OR (•I r, , iII 1Jh 16. INDICATED QUANTITIES ARE ESTIMATES AND SHALL BE CONFIRMED BY THEREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT BROWN COLORii, �, , ,/ I - - << }- - , CONTRACTOR. Z 3"LAYER OF BUFF LANDSCAPE GRAVEL I « - - SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED + MOUNDED AT EDGE TO FORM ASHALLOW / iil Ij /t - 1 - c —7 — << -1- - - - — I/ — — -E L - (IIiq iiI 17. ADJUST SPACING OF PLANT MATERIALS AROUND ADJACENT UTILITY STRUCTURES. ill '� PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE TREES 8 TREES 6 8 _ _ fi - STATE OF MINNESOTA. 2 SAUCER-DO NOT PLACE MULCH DIRECTLY I I - - f< I +.d 61: - - - - RYAN J. ANDERSON STAKING DIAGRAM ON TREE TRUNK,LEAVE A MIN.3"RING l'r44 (2)MS kAROUND CROWN __ � I 1 _ I I 1.-1 (2)CO CITY LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS HARDWOOD STAKES 2"X2'X8'LONG-INSTALL I I 1 �,1'--� -c-, DATE 09/20/2022 LIC. NO. 55938 UJ OUTSIDE OF ROOTBALL AT 5'MAX HT i_R 1 AS REQUIRED IN THE CITY OF APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA ZONING CODE. THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, Ce SET ROOT FLARE 3"ABOVE FINISH GRADE Ili y 1 I I INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED O CUT AND REMOVE AT MINIMUM THE TOP HALF t• II1II I 1 W W PARKING AREA = 167,641 SF WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. OF WIRE BASKETS,BURLAP AND/OR TWINE F - CODE: AT LEAST 2% OF PARKING LOT AREA MUST BE PARKING ISLAND. PROJECT -FINISH AND REMOVE FROM THE PLANTING PIT.AVOID (1.- 0 Li �- I II L _ I I I I I I I I I 1 I I L. JII IaNO ISLAND SHALL HAVE LESS AREA THAN A STANDARD PARKING STALL. Z GRADE CUTTING OR SCARING ROOTS.ANY ROOTSISLANDS SHALL BE PLANTED AT RATE OF ONE TREE PER 150 SF. THAT ARE SCARED OR BROKEN DURING 'o (2)GA _ ) Cti) oc.) ) _i ( MINIMUM TREE SIZE IS 2-1/2" DIAMETER. �f _ PLANTING SHALL BE PRUNED 90 O //// // // _vicrI �_ I1 1 I 1 � ° ��!�-��-�� A - -�� BACKFILL PLANTING PIT WITH NATIVE 3353 SF = 2/° OF 167,641 SF ( TOTAL PARKING AREA) I=f =1 I - 1 = �v 22 TREES = REQUIRED TREES (3353 / 150 = 22.4) APPLE VALLEY I— I -I I-I I-I I- 1 1_ I I -I H I-I H I-1' SOIL-EXCEPT WHEN IN HEAVY CLAY,MIX _ -III-III-1 -I I- I 1—III=1I 1= AMENDED TOPSOIL FROM A LOCAL SOURCE I 3571 SF - TOTAL PARKING ISLAND AREA SHOWN (2.13% OF PARKING LOT) 11=111=111E 11E Ell -I11=111 WITH NATIVE SOIL ��I am/ 22 TREES SHOWN ON PLAN SQUARE 7TH 0 -III—III—I =1 II-III- 1 =1 I 1=1 I 1- HE I.I- -1 I 1=� EXCAVATE PLANTING PIT TO A DEPTH EQUAL I ADDITION I�II I II 1 II I II III -I I El l II I II 1111 TO THE DEPTH OF THE ROOTBALL MINUS 3" itt) 11 111 _ -o-III,;I 1 \ , I -, II11I- AND A MINIMUM TWICE THE DIAMETER OF THE O - �/1 _ « LLROOTBALL.PLACE ROOTBALL ON - - -- ROOTBALL DIA UNDISTURBED SOIL AND ENSURE TRUNK OF - L - _ « - - �/ W TREE IS PLUMB1001' ' 1 I - _ « - - - 2X ROOTBALL DIA h , I LH - - -L - - / <- - < - APPLE VALLEY MINNESOTA CO ( IIh) _ / 1 2 Ms. S �< 1 O i Z I i � _J i N REVISION SCHEDULE I - _ _ 0 . 1I I - 1 Uti/ityEa nt DATE DESCRIPTION BY DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING 1 I 711 perp/at 0 NTS 7 v .A IT - �-- , - - _ Ct— - -1-9 — — 'L < -I - I- - - - - -1 1 0 PERENNIALS TO BE INSTALLED SO THAT THE j I I - - < ;t i i 10Um TOP OF THE CROWN OF THE PLANT IS // A . -A - - �� • SLIGHTLY ABOVE FINISH GRADE ` f- \'�` '1 ' (2)GA T -FINISH GRADE _ _ _ _ _ _ �_ I �� G -EDGE OF BED - I 1 I I 1 Uti/ityEasement PROJECT NO. 1 6-1 9870 3"LAYER OF BUFF LANDSCAPE GRAVEL per plat I I v (2)CO FILE NAME LFO C5 LAND 0 - - - I 7-� DRAWN BY LFO CUT AND REMOVE THE ENTIRE CONTAINERI �� i`�,/, AND SCARIFY,AS NECESSARY, ROOTS FOR I 1 I I I I I 1 + DESIGNED BY LFO/RJA Z �/ ALL CONTAINERIZED PLANTS#5 GALLONS i - - I I I W W / REVIEWED BY RJA j(((' r/j OR SMALLER - - J I I 1 1 ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE 07/18/2022 i � i I I I I I � I I •I I I >m II —III-1 I ? 1NII -11 ? _-I I= _ UTL- _ 111-ull WCLIENT PROJECT NO. Ce - 1=111=I11— 1 11= =III=_I --- UTL---- UTL UTL --- - V - 11 111=111==1TILLALLPLANTBEDSTOAMINIMUM 7�T =1 I I—III—III1 �l i I-� -� �-� E-�E I— = I_ DEPTH OF 6"AND BACKFILL PER UE uE --- UE UE _ - uE /I —III-1 I I—I I SPECIFICATIONS WHEN PROVIDED IN �t uE uE --J TITLE SECTION AREAS WITH HEAVY CLAY OR ROCKY J - uE -- 1 k \ Z SOILS AMEND WITH AMENDED PLANTING •--- uE -- - uE ---- N ,1 Z ok _ SOIL FROM A LOCAL SOURCE.PLACE /0/ O CONTAINER ON UNDISTURBED SOIL AND LANDSCAPE PLAN ENSURE PLANT IS PLUMB urt 2 T J Q W in PERENNIAL PLANTING IX N 0 30 60 NTS a N .�.�. SHEET C) o SCALE IN FEET c5 _ 10 ,_ 0 1_, I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I S-2 SEAL BUILDING SIGN 15'6" r ./ 5'-10" / 5'-10" / 5'-10" /7/ FIRE RISER, ( K43.00 ) DECORATIVE PANELS BY 12'-6"S-3 LTK BUILDING SIGN I H -I . 1 I �- _I I - - 7 77 NOTE I WATER METER, VENDOR. L20.00 FREEZER AND BACK FLOW H H I !I I I - 6 - 6 �- - -111 L20.00 G30.36 PREVENTER H H I - - _ - - �/ 1.IT IS RESPONSIBILITY OF THE G.C.TO COORDINATE DELIVERY, UNCRATING, _ _ _ - 4k-1-I _ _ _ _ POSITIONING, FINAL HOOK UP AND REMOVAL OF TRASH OF ALL OWNER SUPPLIED rr I I I- KITCHEN EQUIPMENT.. e .,. d. ,. a ,. , ,, .- a -. . ,i • -♦r . ♦ .. ♦ .:,♦h . p :. .♦r.;.., :. .♦r,, ♦P :. .♦r . :. ♦ 7 ♦ ♦ ;fi ♦ 7 ♦ ♦ 77T1�.. . � �( .� l .� . ( . .� l .� . i � ♦ � � ♦I • i�� 1%' I J�(i(o"`I i ♦I ♦ i •T •I • P 1' n • • 1" r • • • _ l l J l �/-- „r,�i 1 ,�,I �Lr. �..r,�i � �,.,� ��, �G.♦, , r,�,�.N !' 1 l �®1r"! • 1 1♦I�i.�1! I Z I.4-01i"! �OIiE'�'G, 1 O�G.4-0, 1,� I II I 1 1 ♦ � � L. � ET I��'I�o1�:e2e�..UaT._b.�.e�.�.A.�.��efe:1?.�e2e1.�.�.1.�_I.ee 1J.oU�e2.,,.,U��1.�.r,�w.A�.1�.�0�eA.�.A.�.��t�fltr,:eta.1.e.1.�,��.�.r,A..11�2.._�a1i,�1��1,,♦.eA...1.A.�1�:efe�Ala +�...g.#.s.1.e.1�.�1�,u+I�.1.�a�e�eeA.a.1�S.1.e1�A1ofleeel.A.#s�.a�11.�1�/I�.I.g.As�e11Lf1,�2m.1.1�,J:o..A.e.1.1...1.#Ia�h�,c11.��.1 aA.As 1��.J1L�i,�A�.1..�.,As��■�+ ,■� •-= DOFF a- U �I �( � % - ! :z : : LCTOR 11 I, Il, j 24_x48 1 E 1oCHITECTU I ErJEE41NIGSPATIP.L // K74.00 / ? 115Soh1 . I-- 4TIER5 A47. • % ■ / II• �II . y �� _- fir I I- % Jzo.00 !IIII %1 ^° Suite 950 m I�e.._ �� COUNTER LOGO o I i �• i-'�ur� A45.40 / 4.FOR DINING ROOM FURNITURE, SEE DECOR PACKAGE, CONTACT DECOR VENDOP. 7:;;;;] / C�� - U �� G40.42 +41.10 G20.48 MR G61.30 �� \ / all `�� !'�� in FOR DETAILS. Oakbrook Terrace, IL 60181 jiIJj 50. 0 630.424.9080 NIII G40.48 1 ( � a ) 1[11 _ '` A10.30 ■' / J50.00 "J '■ / I 5.ARCHITECT OF RECORD TO ENSURE AND COORDINATE THAT ALL INTERIOR AND O li 40.11 \ r l r l Q q 3'-5 1/2" lip- - II G10.48 II_= I24"x48 I III ' K74.00 `6E11 10'8 1/2" al ; - / I� \�/ \�/ EXTERIOR COMPLIES WITH ADA REQUIREMENTS AS WELL AS LOCAL JURISDICTIONS. FAX: 630.495.3731 �I� •I' f� ! 11.11 J20.00 �III G10.48, 3'9" 40.01 _ �1' IN % CO7� I (ice; (( :1. ■� I ftg I�� • III a G20.48 I 124"x48' -I A47.40 G61.30 En� I N • • ``!'' l ' Q '41 -;�� C • I� I4TIE95 I il= KITCHEN J50.00 LC 14'-7"S-1 BUILDING SIGN = �� HOOD = ', /III11 -----. t: 1 ' NOTE _1 \ o In /''w x wG2O.48IEWA r 4 , I(b . 1 ) 1' i A10.30 G61.36El II, 29"HEIGHT ih `� EL AII OOLER i E11 ARE ' G2O.48 it I �I / KNEE WALLSERVICE 101 I 1. IT IS RESPONSIBILITY OF THE G.C.TO COORDINATE DELIVERY, UNCRATING, \ Q45 110 � II {I08 �III�II ?4"x48 .� 48"HEIGHT AREA '-� POSITIONING, FINAL HOOK UP AND REMOVAL OF TRASH OF ALL OWNER SUPPLIED rillG40.42 ; KITCHEN EQUIPMENT. * \\: \'z di IIII IV I1I�[� A24.U2 1 % J31.00i_ G10.60 ' � � h _ Illll�ll��lllilllilll \ ` I_�-�1 11111 �_ , 12 HOUR 105 41x1b 42x�6 ��, [*MOM io O t+40.0 ___ �j IIM A47.20 t V NRINATION I I G 0 2.ALL KITCHEN EQUIPMENT TO BE INSTALLED AS PER MANUFACTURER'S - - SPECIFICATIONS.IL ,N10.10 Ill �� A (N40.10�J I mr- 1 10. •• = _ in 1 II-r, r M30.00 I , _, ,,_ ___: _.. . 1,. o I- II II O 3.DECOR ITEMS SUPPLIED BY OWNER AND INSTALLED BY GENERAL CONTRACTOR. 0 _ _ N40.10In \ �oILI _ . _ _ _ _ LwJII/ CUSTOM ORDER :II 4.FOR DINING ROOM FURNITURE,SEE DECOR PACKAGE, CONTACT DECOR VENDOR / E30.84 L PICK UP SCREEN I I - MOP _ N60.00 I / A54.00 N60.00 J I I °' FOR DETAILS. �1 n L 0 ,� ISTORAGE II I EYE WASH STATION N10.00 0o I CO 5.ARCHITECT OF RECORD TO ENSURE AND COORDINATE THAT ALL INTERIOR AND \ ROOF/LADDER CAN BE REMOVED IF °D _ I SUPPLIED BY OWNER c� M NEON BISCUITS ItK-COLESLAW I EXTERIOR COMPLIES WITH ADA REQUIREMENTS AS WELL AS LOCAL JURISDICTIONS. \ I■I_I • \ TRFIJCH DRAIN • -I� I / D29.00-) {C50.00) C10.32) C41.00 D93.10 D92.00 J40.00 D94.10 1 MANIFESTO (LARGE) EXPERIENCE SHUFFLE 0 J 0 iILI T PrA w N20.00 �� C20.00 C40.00 ) _ I H � i/ n ��-� J N70.00L IIII_IIIIII III - II I . Qi +i!i eivi eimiryyyyyyr�g o.v.r��ywa ..........w.UVi!i!iG�diS�i!i!i!i!i!i!i!i�i!i!i!i!i!i_i!i__i!i!i!_L�i2�01��A1r: U z,"' II-- 11IIII/ IIII/ N O) • ,� �� .�.1 i�::�■ 1 WATER MURAL ` ' ':� _ J 400 PERIMETER CENTER TERRACE r s lliM� I�� ,w 4'-2° �� ■ I K72.00 K10.00 � N82.01 :2.01 =. SUITE 1000 n � taiiiilIII!■ ;� 11IItl I ► MEN's ��_ woMEN�s� -= NEW KITCHEN EQUIPMENT SGHEDULE ATLANTA, GA 30346 o - _ _. I IIIIIII� II I I_�II - 1 ... .- •• I- II 14I • 1 Il.n.., ►i, O �� 404-459-4450 ■ N40.00 I IIIIII 'II CONTRACTORSHOULDREFERTOMANUFACTURERSPECIFICATIONSFORALLSERVICEREQUIREMENTSANDPROPERIII lOiIIlljiIi II ' 103 _ WRM. ( 1 oaf `,. ■ 'QV �� \ • S-5 BUILDING SIGN CONNECTIONS. / r D90.00 (C18.00}1 J 1.00 I C18.00 PREP u► _ N75.o1 / VEST. N75.01 _ Z K11.00 H10.00 .y I - MEWS SIGN 102 WOM EN'S \ - - ITEMNO QTY CATEGORY MFR MODEL EQUIPMENT REMARKS (N40.10 D22.00. I B60.00 �!u❑r��l II H- SIGN > I \ D11.54 J �, N10.00 106 K30.00 l�n'�{ I- -_li _ ` SI C _ A10.30 2 MULTIPLE FRYER SYSTEM,GAS ULTRAFRYER BP20203 K15.00 N61.00 D20.00 �' \ D10.30 ,- 1 ® l J -I (K41.00 11 �'�� 7 �% -I N80.00 DANCE SERN S /gA7N�CE N80.00 4 - A10.40 2 SHORTENING DISPOSAL UNIT ULTRAFRYER DISPOSAL NOT SHOWN IN PLAN \ .• Al 2 B IL T HOSE ULTRAFRYER BOILOUTNOTSHOWN PLAN > K40.00 D81.00 B65.00 :10.00 G83.48 ` • 3 - :�.- 0 50 O oU OS UL A R IN N = CONCRETE I fir. ^.� 7� �_ - K71.00 ,. I II �a ' - L PAD �u� �li�!!!�C�9 1 :�P, I �� rrrrrrrrerrnrrrrrrr r e rrrrrrrrrrnrrrrrr-- rrrrrrArAgrAr�pppprpprr�prprr�rprr�r�rprr�rprnr�ggr�nr��rrrrp�r.�pri�i♦i♦i♦Di♦i♦i♦di�i♦iFc ..- A24.U2 1 MULTIPLE FRYER SYSTEM,GAS ULTRAFRYER BP30142UCP 0 I��j �Ir�_, ,:_ I r�I;' N10.00 ICI t, ........._._...._._._.a.....u...ba.. .bb.. ....u...u....u...�.:�Ai�iG....u. �,I IFIMK72.00 _ Ij - �R!. O 1 • /,WM IIII /111111 m _ A31.00 1 MARINATOR AYRKING M101-110 I 1 ELECTRICAL PANELS If' I. 'i1 - IleL___ e _1 ..,.,:. ./ � \ -• A35.00 1 ONE COMPARTMENT SINK WINHOLT 1143828 iiiiiiii . 10; E-��mO LI'= - - - .� �I =__� STAFF / \ 0 A35.10 1 PRE-RINSE FAUCET ASSEMBLY T&S BRASS B2180 n0 1n e .♦J•t.1, ,, / .•.t - .:. . ` �,,..,..y..- �11 = - G10.48 • - .f.e., dll .4uAkaitA.A.A.4. ..�♦ .�a� �m lAt ian u.AA•�•A.,A1...•em e,.�..,L A.40Vii. ♦•wa r.Eu r.i�i. ♦� iA6,0 ',�j. tod 0✓i. .erj J50.00 Ill _ - - •1 A45.40 1 PROTEIN RAIL FOR 4 PAN BATTER STATIO AYRKING PSR581410 II -�_� �_.___.� -_._�__�� - _�____._ --�__�__ __ _ -- ..Lt��a1,�1.1oA.e�1I1,.®e. I,.Vo1oV 1 re� :�I EII• 109 I ► l r J20.00 ■ •♦1 =_- K42.00 M20.00 G55.42 1 /in r A47.20 2 BATTER STATION 29" AYRKING BBSUL2934P L20.00 - J20.00 1 Il ' -'- _ / r A47.40 1 BATTER STATION 100" KES CUSTOM =1-'- Xes A48.30 1 3-PAN ICE BATH TABLE FABRICATION KES CUSTOM DECORATIVE PANELS BY Ii � 1�WI M40.00 N / ►� VENDOR. ® • G51.30 K10.00 _ �l�a.�.�.c�I _ - Po A49.00 1 DRUMROLL AYRKING DRUF12OTPR 8POP O -- i::: :;:WM III/I/I/I IIiiiiii II�I111 Illiiiii MITI% ii�t1t/I/I/I/I111iiii i IIII111 Iliiiilil) - :iI�IIi c - - A54.00 1 REACH-IN FREEZER DELFIELD GBF1P-S >, L_ J L J A60.00 1 15'HOOD FRANKEE 3347-FR-BD-2 OFFICE PORTAL UNIT, n (K20.00 610.00 1 CONVECTION OVEN,DOUBLE STACKED BLODGETT OVEN CTB DBL O 9'-9"S-1 BUILDING SIGN PRINTER AND CHAIR BY 0 ABOVE CANOPY WATER FILTRATION 9'-9"S-3 LTK BUILDING SIGN RESTAURANT OWNER.REFER B60.00 1 REACH-IN REFRIGERATOR DELFIELD GBR1 P-S SYSTEM TO RESTAURANT OWNER SUPPLIED EQUIPMENT B65.00 1 BISCUIT HOLDING UNIT KES CUSTOM IH L C10.32 1 POPEYES DUAL SIDE SANDWICH PREP KES CUSTOM Ln C18.00 2 POPEYES 24"X 42"TOASTER TABLE KES CUSTOM N K) C20.00 2 TOASTER ANTUNES VCT-2 CO C40.00 1 PRODUCT HOLDING UNIT PRINCE CASTLE EHBP23 CD1 EQUIPMENT PLAN C41.00 1 PROTEIN HOLDING UNIT PRINCE CASTLE PHB41 F A2 SCALE: 1/4"=1-0" C50.00 2 BUN RACK CAMBRO UPR1826F20580 0 D10.30 1 WORK TABLE-30" KES CUSTOM D11.54 1 WORK TABLE-54" KES CUSTOM D20.00 2 MICROWAVE OVEN PANASONIC NE-17523 N Z D22.00 1 MICROWAVE SHELF KES CUSTOM D29.00 1 PACKING TABLE,DOUBLE SIDED KES CUSTOM EC D40.00 1 3-BOWL SINK KES CUSTOM O D40.03 1 SPLASH DIVIDER KES CUSTOM n D41.00 1 CLEAN DISHTABLE ADVANCE TABCO DTC-S60-24R N D50.00 1 DISHWASHER HOBART AM-16VLT-2 0 Z EC D70.00 2 HOT WATER DISPENSER BUNN H5E UI) 1 1 W D81.00 1 RETHERMALIZER,WATER TANK,ELECTRIC ULTRAFRYER REO-1620-X (n D90.00 1 PROOFER CABINET,MOBILE WINSTON HA4522 I E D92.00 1 HOLDING BINS PRINCE CASTLE PHB21N2 r , D93.10 1 HOLDING BINS PRINCE CASTLE DHB2PT-60P ` w `./ D94.00 1 PROTIEN HOLDING BIN PRINCE CASTLE PHB34R2 Z 1 < 0 D94.10 1 BISCUIT HOLDING BIN PRINCE CASTLE PHB21N1 O E10.00 1 WALK-IN COOLER KOLPAK CUSTOMI (I) O E20.00 2 CHICKEN RACKS SPG 4H1286 1- W EC - - I_J..J Q wZ E30.84 1 CHICKEN CRATE NWS D125050500N Z E71.20 1 DOUBLE EVEN-THAW REFRIGERATOR TRAULSEN RE232N-1 G10.36 1 COATED WIRE SHELVING-4 TIERS 36" METRO 2436NK3 1 I- LLI G10.48 4 COATED WIRE SHELVING-4 TIERS 48" METRO 2448NK3 CL >- G10.60 2 COATED WIRE SHELVING-4 TIERS 60" METRO 2448NK3 z W E G20.48 5 WIRE SHELVING 48" METRO 2448NK3 11 I� C"� > G30.36 4 WIRE SHELVING WALL MOUNTED-2 TIERS METRO 1436NK3 Ln < Cl) G40.42 2 DUNNAGE RACK KES CUSTOM w D > G40.48 2 DUNNAGE RACK KES CUSTOM W J G50.30 2 WIRE SHELVING UNCOATED-2 TIER 30" METRO CUSTOM = CL 0 ti a G50.36 1 DUNNAGE RACK METRO CUSTOM I ti Q 0 E G51.30 1 POS TABLE-30" METRO CUSTOM O G52.72 1 DRIVE THRU TABLE-72" KES CUSTOM - C G55.42 1 WORK TABLE W/UNDERSHELF KES CUSTOM G83.48 1 EXPEDITE TABLE KES CUSTOM /\Revisions: H10.00 1 MODULAR PRODUCTION COUNTER-DUAL LINE KES CUSTOM No: Description: Date: I J20.00 3 CASH CONTROLLER NKL INDUSTRIES W-101 J31.00 1 CONDIMENT ORGANIZER BIN RACK CAMBRO 12RS12 ' N J40.00 1 UNDERCOUNTER REFRIGERATOR SILVER KING SKRS28 ' E J50.00 3 DISPOSABLE CUP DISPENSER DISPENSE-RITE WR-CC-22-POP . K10.00 2 ICE MAKER,CUBE-STYLE MANITOWOC IBF0620C . n O K11.00 1 ICE MAKER,CUBE-STYLE MANITOWOC IYF0900N • • . O K15.00 1 ICE BIN MANITOWOC D570 8POP K20.00 1 WATER FILTER SYSTEM EVERPURE EV943710 K30.00 1 FROZEN LEMONADE BUNN 34000.0012 O K40.00 1 GREASE TANK - I K41.00 1 CO2 TANK K42.00 1 BAG N BOX BY OTHERS Proj. No.: 083257 E K43.00 2 WATER HEATERS BY OTHERS O K71.00 1 TEA BREWER BUNN ITCB Date: 10/21/22 K72.00 4 TEA DISPENSER BUNN TDO40 K74.00 4 POS BY OTHERS L20.00 3 TRASH BINS Drawn by: RC LP45.00 1 OUTSIDE TRASH RECEPTACLE WAUSAU TF1015 I LP46.00 1 OUTSIDE TRASH RECEPTICAL WAUSAU TF1021 N M11.00 1 MANAGERS DESK NWS F367310100N (N M20.00 1 OFFICE SUPPLIES WASSER 106053 Sheet Name: O EN M30.00 1 SAFE FIRE KING BSD2920 M40.00 1 LOCKERS W/6 HIGH UNIT KELMAX EL SERIES - EQUIPMENT PLAN & N10.00 4 HAND SINK KROWNE HS-68 CN N20.00 1 MOP SINK FIAT MSB3624 SCHEDULES N40.00 2 FIRE EXTINGUISHER ACTION 436500 CLASS K I. O N40.10 1 FIRE EXTINGUISHER ACTION 434909 O N60.00 2 INGREDIENTS BIN RUBBERMAID FG360288WHT N61.00 1 INGREDIENTS BIN RUBBERMAID FG360288WHT N70.00 1 MOP&BROOM HAGER ADVANCED K42 Sheet No: N N75.01 2 FAUCET KROWNE 16-197 W10.00 2 DRIVE-THRU WINDOW QUIKSERV BP-72x �2 LE n GENERAL NOTES SYMBOL LEGEND EXTERIOR ELEVATION NOTES 1/2" & 1. SEALANT/CAULKING AROUND DOOR/WINDOW FRAMES.COLOUR:TO MATCH WINDOW/DOOR FRAMES. 1 PRE-FINISHED METAL CAP FLASHING C/W DRIP. , . , I \ NOTE REFERENCE 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BECOME FAMILIAR WITH AND FOLLOW ALL DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 1 REFER TO ELEVATION NOTES 2 G.0 TO PROVIDE AND INSTALL DOUBLE LAYER OF REINFORCING MESH TO MIN.2'-2"ABOVE GRADE AT ALL EIFS LOCATIONS(TYP.)IN EIFS ORDER TO ATTAIN ABUSE RESISTANCE STUCCO SYSTEM. 3. SIGNAGE IS BY OTHERS AND WILL BE PERMITTED SEPARATELY.PROTOTYPICAL SIGNAGE SHOWN IS FOR FN# FINISH TYPE W O O L P E R T REFERENCE ONLY AND SUBJECT TO LOCAL SIGN REQUIREMENTS 3 NICHIHA VINTAGEBRICK,COLOR:ALEXANDRIA BUFF.REFER TO POPEYES MASTER SCHEDULE. O-) ARCHITECTURE I ENGINEERING I GEOSPATIAL 4 NICHIHA VINTAGEBRICK,COLOR:WHITE WASH.REFER TO POPEYES MASTER SCHEDULE. 1815 South Meyers Road 5 EIFS.REFER TO POPEYES MASTER SCHEDULE. Suite 950 6 PRE-FINISHED'BLACK ANODIZED'ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM WITH INSULATED GLAZING. 5 3 SECTION DETAIL @ TYPICAL Oakbrook Terrace, IL 60181 SCALE: 2%2"=1'-0" EIFS REVEAL 7 EXPOSED FOUNDATION TO BE PARGED AND FREE OF IMPERFECTIONS. A 630.424.9080 Cip 8 GAS UTILITY METER. FAX: 630.495.3731 9 REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR FOUNDATION WALL AND FOOTING DETAILS. LD 10 INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED BUILDING SIGNAGE PROVIDED AND INSTALLED BY SIGN COMPANY.G.0 TO PROVIDE AND INSTALL 4" J SIM. SIM. EXTERIOR GRADE PRESSURE TREATED PLYWOOD BACKING AND ALL FINAL ELECTRICAL CONNECTION.SIGN MANUFACTURER Q 5 EP-1 1 MC-1 20 10 5 EP-1 18 10 1 EP-1'• '• 4 EB-2 EP-1 0 EP-2 SHALL OBTAIN STRUCTURALLY SEALED DRAWINGS AND SIGNAGE PERMITS FROM THE CITY BASED ON LOCAL REQUIREMENTS.G.0 EP-1 © SHALL VERIFY ACTUAL LOCATION&SIZE OF SIGNS WITH SIGN MANUFACTURERS APPROVED DRAWINGS AND COORDINATE S�E4 '• Li '� LOCATIONS OF BLOCKING AND UTILITIES.G.0 TO COORDINATE WITH SIGN INSTALLER TO USE VHM DRILL BIT WHILE DRILLING FOR _IELECTRICAL FEED LINES AND SIGNAGE FASTENERS.ALL ELEMENTS PROVIDED BY SIGNAGE FABRICATOR TO BE REVIEWED AND n I 2'-0" APPROVED BY POPEYES PRIOR TO PRODUCTION O y8'S11 IF Q 'I 'I I I I V I/O TOWER�0'-OU� 11 NON-ILLUMINATED BUILDING SIGNAGE PROVIDED AND INSTALLED BY SIGN COMPANY.G.0 TO PROVIDE AND INSTALL 4"EXTERIOR w - r o I I I o \ GRADE PRESSURE TREATED PLYWOOD BACKING..SIGN MANUFACTURER SHALL OBTAIN STRUCTURALLY SEALED DRAWINGS AND / IR V ________ J _ V CD r ;- T/O PARAPET 19'0" • SIGNAGE PERMITS FROM THE CITY BASED ON LOCAL REQUIREMENTS.G.0 SHALL VERIFY ACTUAL LOCATION&SIZE OF SIGNS WITH • \EQ. 14'-7"71 EQ�1 CEI SIGN MANUFACTURER'S APPROVED DRAWINGS AND COORDINATE LOCATIONS OF BLOCKING AND UTILITIES.G.0 TO COORDINATE 71 N W 1 I WITH SIGN INSTALLER TO USE VHM DRILL BIT WHILE DRILLING FOR ELECTRICAL FEED LINES AND SIGNAGE FASTENERS.ALL V / o II-.1 _II- r °1_II - 0 ° 1I, ,°, ,°, ,°, ,li ° 4 0 0 3I, ,°, ,I;III_it_0_iII I;II-/_ I I I< 3 EB-1 ELEMENTS PROVIDED BY SIGNAGE FABRICATOR TO BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY POPEYES PRIOR TO PRODUCTION ]C I II CI I, 11 II--11 11 CI u u u II 11 11 II 71 II I,'II- II II II C]C II -CC - , , , , , , , , - , , , , , f - - 1 , , [ 71 N�1- I rh1 II u" II-II._..II a II II II II II u -1��1 u- II II II II�V, a .II II u I �� I I I [ I I 12 NICHIHA VINTAGE WOOD,COLOR:CEDAR.REFER TO POPEYES MASTER SCHEDULE. II II1II II -1II II 1II II II II II -1II III III �II� III II ITI II 1II III �II� III III III II II IC II�_ / II 11 11 II II II II I ' ' ' ' ' ' I�JJ w �u w ==u =u/ ` II;'11 II =I, II -,II' 'II' 'IICII _CI 13 PROVIDE&INSTALL 6"DIAMETER STEEL PIPE BOLLARD TOP AT 4'-6"A.F.F.G.C.TO PAINT"SAFETY YELLOW".REFER TO POPEYES 15'-0" T/O LOW PARAPET �� , , , , , ( O - I II 11_II /-� _ I I III _ LL MASTER SCHEDULE. N ° = I , U/S OF DECK 14'-0" L - - I V� � . ��".1. > I 14 DRIVE-THRU WINDOW.REFER TO DRIVE-THRU WINDOW SCHEDULE ON SHEET A11. D D r1 r1 C_i1 _ LL @HIGH POINT 1 =T1 u--CC J N C 71 1 1 I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I 15 N/A. EQ./ /EQ. /�1 1111 I � L u u IS 1- u 1 =u CI 1 1 TI a== U/S OF DECK 13'-5" 27 > 1� �II 11� �I II -1-7-7-7-7-7-7-7-7- -_CE 16 PRE-FINISHED GALVANIZED STEEL DOWNSPOUT&COLLECTOR BOX.G.C.TO COORDINATE WITH CIVIL ENGINEERS TO CONFIRM IF 400 PERIMETER CENTER TERRACE n II II II II 1 II 1 1 1 1 1 ° I I I I I III I 3 0 @LOW POINT DOWNSPOUTS ARE SPLASHING ON CONCRETE PAD OR TIED TO THE STORM SEWER LINE.REFER TO MECHANICAL DRAWINGS. SUITE 1000 ° _ _ II CI 11 IC II- CI I[-II 11 =11 II 11 11 II 11 11 11 1 1 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 C 11 11 CL ATLANTA, GA 30346 Cl / JI II -1I- II 1 1 II -1I 1 1 -II II -11- 11 II- -11 II II- V -11- II 11- -1II II -1I- 11 II- 11 II -II 17 N/A. 9'o° U/S CANOPY ; -•• 404-459-4450 18 DASHED LINE INDICATES T/O OF ROOF BEHIND PARAPET. I/ I/ I/ �/ I/O WINDOWS g-0" A - V ,I/ i/ I I /�-I Y C /Y j__?//// / / //� a �/ 19 C/T CABINET AND METER. Z C-1 33 / / V /A" / / / / / 20 LINE OF PARAPET WALLS BEYOND. / / 1/ / � / / / � 21 GENERAL PURPOSE EXTERIOR LIGHTING FIXTURES. O / ' 37 C-2 1, / I / I 22 WALK-IN COOLER/FREEZER FINISH TO BE COMPLETED BY MANUFACTURER. O ? 23 METAL RAILING SUPPLIED AND INSTALLED BY G.0(ONLY IF REQUIRED).ARCHITECT TO COORDINATE WITH CIVIL ENGINEER ON THE '_ \n/ / / SITE PLAN.PAINT FINISH'BLACK'. N n 23 / / 24 PRE-FINISHED GALVANIZED STEEL DOWNSPOUT&COLLECTOR BOX.G.C.TO COORDINATE CIVIL ENGINEERS TO CONFIRM IF n % DOWNSPOUTS ARE SPLASHING ON CONCRETE PAD OR TIED TO THE STORM SEWER LINE.REFER TO MECHANICAL DRAWINGS. Q A A 0'-0" I/O CONC.SLAB \1,1 / // 1 / T/O CONC.SLAB 0'-0" 25 ALL BASE FLASHING TO MATCH ADJACENT MATERIAL COLORS. A A A I I I C I I 26 HOSE BIB.G.C.TO PAINT.COLOUR TO MATCH ADJACENT STUCCO COORDINATE EXACT LOCATION WITH G.C.REFER TO I J MECHANICAL DRAWINGS. N 27 1/2'X%2"REVEAL LINE IN STUCCO FINISH.REFER TO DETAIL 3/A5. n ° I -I 28 NOT USED. - D_ I 29 G.0 TO PROVIDE CONCRETE CURB ALONG DRIVE-THRU LANE.CURB TO PROJECT 8"FROM FACE OF PANELS AND LENGTH OF CURB 13 12 EF-1 FC-4 34 25 m DP-1 6 7 © IS EXTENT OF FEATURE WALL. LO N TYP. TYP. TYP. TYP.hn 30 MURAL GRAPHIC SUPPLY AND INSTALL BY SIGN COMPANY. 00 / 1 PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION MATERIAL CALCULATIONS 31 REAR EXIT DOOR, REFER TOPOPEYESMASTERSCHEDULE A5 SCALE: 1/4" 1' 0" BRICK: 29% 32 WALL SCONCE SUPPLY AND INSTALL BY SIGN COMPANY. ° SIDING: 34% 33 PRE-FABRICATED CANOPIES W/PRE-WIRED RECESSED LIGHTS ABOVE DRIVE-THRU SUPPLY BY SIGN COMPANY AND INSTALL BY a) EIFS: 5% G.C.ALL CANOPIES IN WALL SUPPORT BY G.C.REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. Z GLAZING: 32% 34 VERTICAL SIMULATED WOOD SLATS.REFER TO POPEYES MASTER SCHEDULE. 35 WALL SCONCE LIGHTING.REFER TO ELECTRICAL SCHEDULE. �/ O 36 CONCRETE SIDEWALK(BY G.C).REFER TO SITE PLAN. L.L O 37 HORIZONTAL WOOD GRAIN ENTRANCE CANOPY W/TEAL VERTICAL&HORIZONTAL SUPPORTS SUPPLY BY SIGN COMPANY AND O z INSTALL BY G.C.PRE-WIRED LED LIGHT GLOBE FIXTURE. (f) W 38 2"EIFS PROJECTION @ T/O WALL H Li j I ,, N W 39 EIFS REVEAL SIM. 44 U ©*P 5 EP-1 1 EP-1 18 10 © 5 EP-1 1 EP-1 © 5 EP-1 ` I 5 EP-1EQ 7-2" 7-2" O / / / / / 4'-9" - Ou j < . Z 2 --0" T/O TOWER / Z. Z 19'0" T/O PARAPET V ' ' _ J-L J J_1- it Q 0 < LAW ii 0 CO c1:5) DI r' I 34 ILI D V V v = O N- a 14'-0" U• /S OF DECK L 1'-1 1/2" _ I- J tiQ @HIGH POINT ' - - 4 - y - - _ - - - - /- 7V _ -�- - - - 4 +- J y ,_ 13'S" U• /S OF DECK I ` / D O ,, a - E @ LOW POINT ° I: 3'0" 1 / A Revisions: L. No: Description: Date: N 1=I 11 11 IC II II~]I II II I�IwI II= CI II II II IC _ ' k \ A O \ u- _u' 'u' 'u' 'u' 'u' _IC i=========================== 1III�_ I I I I I I I I I 1� I I I I I I I I I I I , , , , , , , , , II II II Iwllwlwlwl� 11 II II II II II II II II II II II IC ___ +� 1 11 1 1 1 1 11 1 11 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 11 1 11 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 11 1 I.JL_L_L_I ;III I II I I II I I II I I II I r� I I I I I I I I I I I I f \ _ I _ JI 11 II II II IC . . . - E 1 II 11 11 11 11 11 11 I 11 11 IIwlww� 11 -11 II II II II II II II II 11 11 IC ' _ I I I I I I I I I I I ■=========================== 1==ool I I I I I I I I I I 1 27'-9 1/2" / �I II II II II IC II �1 , 11 , 11 IC II II ll u u Iw1IwIwI�l� II_II C71 u u u u u u u II III_ • iC=C=C=C=C=C=C=C=C=C=C=C=C=C 1C=oo - 1 11 - - , ,I, ,°, ,°, ,11, ,11 I I u I IC 1 II II 1 II IL JI -11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 IC � � �� CAI 11 11 11 11 C-u 37 n 11. 111. 1 11. 1.11. 1.11 1 11. 1.11. 1 11 111. 1.11 1 11. 1.11. 1 11 111. ■ - , , , , , , 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ��j I�LI L I I l l l l l l l l l l f -•- ,� I I I I o ■ 1- -11 -11- -1w1 II II �71 II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II IC L =I 11 11 11 11 I�-10 io=000=00000=000=o=000=000=0 Ir �r- -IT-Tr- (``, _ .1.I.Iw1■.1 C N 3 II II C II t II II CI II II 71 II CC II ]I II C II_ - U iC=C=C=C=C=C=C=C=C=C=C=C=C=C r r r r�.�. :�. r� .�. .�.��.�. N ■ .www■.1 II II 1 1 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 II II II 11 11 IC /•� I f �� I II II II II IC II I I: I: I I. I:I I: I:I I I: I:I I: I I.I I: I:I I I: I:I I: I I.I I: I:IIIIIIIIIIIIIIi . II II . II II .I. h II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II IC 7 - II II 11 11 11 I(- 0_ . p .IwIwIw1■.1 u u IwIC II-71 IC II CC II-II CI I[-II-71 IC II CC II-]I u u u IC II_Ti_ I p • _ - P u u u u u u -IC T Io�o�o�o�o�o�o�o�o�o�o�0�0�0 1 I■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■ �I II II II II II II III II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II 11. I.11. 11. I.11. I.11 11. I.11. 11 I.11. I.11 11. I.11. 11 I.11. I.■ 1■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■ / 0) - C]I 11 II II II IC 11_ ■ �Iwlwlwl■m1 II II Iwn II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II I� N - �' I(-�� 101. i=========================== 1 - 11 11 11 I 1 �1 u u Iw1 u u I." u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u IC II ■=========================== S � • S^1QE�I SLICE I. I. I. I. I. I I. I. I I. I. I I. I. I I. I. I.0 �I II II ■�I II II I.,1 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 II I[ ' r I tt% `• , , / ]I 'C II- Proj. No.: 083257 -www■� -11 11 II II 11 II 11 11 II II II 11 II 11 II 11 11 11 11 11 II I[ - �� 1 1, ,1 1 1 1� :=========================== 1 Date: w w11 II II II II II II II II II Iwl II II Iwl II II II II C II �I IC 71 C 10/21/22 ��I . _Iwlwlw■_Iwlwlwlwllwlwlwlwlwlwlwlwlwlwlfll.Iwlwlw�l)•1 11 11 11 11 II T[ _ -\ n ■ •, •, t9 'IL�1 I0_ ■ �Illlwllwlwlwlwlwlwlwlwlwlwl�.Iwlwlwuw II II II II A II �[ O i IoPoPoPoPoPoPoP=PoPoPoP0P0P0 1 1 ■1 ■1 - CID f AA .www..wwwwlwwwwwwwwww.■www,.1 11 11 11 11 IC I �, _ JI 1 -u- -IC 1 1C N 0'0" T/O CONC.SLAB C �IwIwI1■�IIwlwlwnwlwlwlwlwlwlwlwlwlwl�illwl�II I C I y � \ \ \ 1 Q Drawn by: RC \ LANDSCAPE OR 1 FREESTANDING 1 1 N UTILITY SCREEN _L 1 1 o LEN 7 I J 71 Sheet Name: CN EP-3 4 EB-2 EP-3 4 EB-2 EP-4 13 EF-1 m 14 25 12 m 23 33 C 1 14 EF-1 EP-3 4 EB-2 7 36 - EXTERIOR TYP. TYP. TYP. ELEVATIONS N O 2 PROPOSED DT ELEVATION MATERIAL CALCULATIONS A5 SCALE: 1/4"=1' 0" BRICK: 25% SIDING: 22% ao EIFS: 49% Sheet No: ._ E GLAZING: 4% A5 ,_ D_ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I GENERAL NOTES SYMBOL LEGEND EXTERIOR ELEVATION NOTES CAI 1. SEALANT/CAULKING AROUND DOOR/WINDOW FRAMES.COLOUR:TO MATCH WINDOW/DOOR FRAMES. 1 PRE-FINISHED METAL CAP FLASHING C/W DRIP. NOTE REFERENCE 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BECOME FAMILIAR WITH AND FOLLOW ALL DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 1 REFER TO ELEVATION NOTES 2 G.0 TO PROVIDE AND INSTALL DOUBLE LAYER OF REINFORCING MESH TO MIN.2'-2"ABOVE GRADE AT ALL EIFS LOCATIONS(TYP.)IN W O O L P E R T ORDER TO ATTAIN ABUSE RESISTANCE STUCCO SYSTEM. 3. SIGNAGE IS BY OTHERS AND WILL BE PERMITTED SEPARATELY.PROTOTYPICAL SIGNAGE SHOWN IS FOR FN# FINISH TYPE ARCHITECTURE REFERENCE ONLY AND SUBJECT TO LOCAL SIGN REQUIREMENTS 3 NICHIHA VINTAGEBRICK,COLOR:ALEXANDRIA BUFF.REFER TO POPEYES MASTER SCHEDULE. ENGINEERING GEOSPATIAL U 4 NICHIHA VINTAGEBRICK,COLOR:WHITE WASH.REFER TO POPEYES MASTER SCHEDULE. 1815 South Meyers Road Suite 950 LID 5 EIFS.REFER TO POPEYES MASTER SCHEDULE. o Oakbrook Terrace, IL 60181 Q 6 PRE-FINISHED'BLACK ANODIZED'ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM WITH INSULATED GLAZING. I 630.424.9080 L<) 7 EXPOSED FOUNDATION TO BE PARGED AND FREE OF IMPERFECTIONS. o Q 5. 7 8 GAS UTILITY METER. 9 REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR FOUNDATION WALL AND FOOTING DETAILS. LJJ 10 INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED BUILDING SIGNAGE PROVIDED AND INSTALLED BY SIGN COMPANY.G.0 TO PROVIDE AND INSTALL 4' EXTERIOR GRADE PRESSURE TREATED PLYWOOD BACKING AND ALL FINAL ELECTRICAL CONNECTION.SIGN MANUFACTURER ,g SHALL OBTAIN STRUCTURALLY SEALED DRAWINGS AND SIGNAGE PERMITS FROM THE CITY BASED ON LOCAL REQUIREMENTS.G.0 a LLJ 20 1 EP-2 5 EP-1 5 EP-1 18 1 EP-1 34 1 EP-1 5 EP-1 SHALL VERIFY ACTUAL LOCATION&SIZE OF SIGNS WITH SIGN MANUFACTURER'S APPROVED DRAWINGS AND COORDINATE LOCATIONS OF BLOCKING AND UTILITIES.G.0 TO COORDINATE WITH SIGN INSTALLER TO USE VHM DRILL BIT WHILE DRILLING FOR O n ELECTRICAL FEED LINES AND SIGNAGE FASTENERS.ALL ELEMENTS PROVIDED BY SIGNAGE FABRICATOR TO BE REVIEWED AND EL APPROVED BY POPEYES PRIOR TO PRODUCTION Q IP n V V T/O TOWER 20 0" 11 NON-ILLUMINATED BUILDING SIGNAGE PROVIDED AND INSTALLED BY SIGN COMPANY.G.0 TO PROVIDE AND INSTALL 4"EXTERIOR o =CCCCC GRADE PRESSURE TREATED PLYWOOD BACKING..SIGN MANUFACTURER SHALL OBTAIN STRUCTURALLY SEALED DRAWINGS AND / V I 1 T/O PARAPET 19'0" SIGNAGE PERMITS FROM THE CITY BASED ON LOCAL REQUIREMENTS.G.0 SHALL VERIFY ACTUAL LOCATION&SIZE OF SIGNS WITH _1� cn 1 1 I SIGN MANUFACTURER'S APPROVED DRAWINGS AND COORDINATE LOCATIONS OF BLOCKING AND UTILITIES.G.0 TO COORDINATE 0--) 11=11 I V WITH SIGN INSTALLER TO USE VHM DRILL BIT WHILE DRILLING FOR ELECTRICAL FEED LINES AND SIGNAGE FASTENERS.ALL f\ ELEMENTS PROVIDED BY SIGNAGE FABRICATOR TO BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY POPEYES PRIOR TO PRODUCTION \� n JC 1 / snr 12 NICHIHA VINTAGE WOOD,COLOR:CEDAR.REFER TO POPEYES MASTER SCHEDULE. 13 PROVIDE&INSTALL 6"DIAMETER STEEL PIPE BOLLARD TOP AT 4'-6"A.F.F.G.C.TO PAINT"SAFETY YELLOW".REFER TO POPEYES / _ _ _ _ - - V MASTER SCHEDULE. L D� 0 L L)- n\1 n �o T V_ - — — — J V U/S OF DECK 14'0" HIGH POINT 14 DRIVE-THRU WINDOW.REFER TO DRIVE-THRU WINDOW SCHEDULE ON SHEET Al 1. _I _ I 35 15 N/A. 400 PERIMETER CENTER TERRACE n \U/S OF DECK 13'-5" 'U @ LOW POINT 16 PRE-FINISHED GALVANIZED STEEL DOWNSPOUT&COLLECTOR BOX.G.C.TO COORDINATE WITH CIVIL ENGINEERS TO CONFIRM IF SUITE 1000 2'-11" DOWNSPOUTS ARE SPLASHING ON CONCRETE PAD OR TIED TO THE STORM SEWER LINE. REFER TO MECHANICAL DRAWINGS. ATLANTA, GA 30346 n o T \q 17 N/A. 404-459-4450 o U/S CANOPY 9'0" 18 DASHED LINE INDICATES T/O OF ROOF BEHIND PARAPET. LJLJLJI i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 :1 ILJLJLJLJLJLJ A J0�1 11 , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , u , , 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ° ° 11 1 1 1 CCCI i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i :1-L:L:L:L.L.L.L:L:L:I 1 I I 1 1 I 11 uooLJL. \70�01 uuuC a �CCCCCCCn COC EP-5 19 C/T CABINET AND METER. o/ 000liiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii CC000000000C.CCCCCCCCC 0000L 33 Z ]O�r-11 u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u 1C 11 I:�r-�r-lr I I I I I: I: I I I I CCCI � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � oo�r1 5 �0�1 ° ° CCCI not 1 12 EF 1 LINE OF PARAPET WALLS BEYOND. 70�r-11 II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II 1 1 II I:CC I: 1 1 1. 1. 1: C 1 20 0001 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CCCCCC =CCC CCCCC J1mr—II 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 IC 11 1 1 / I. I: I: CCCI 1 1 1 1_ ooC 1 I4 EB-2 21 GENERAL PURPOSE EXTERIOR LIGHTING FIXTURES. 37 '��1 70�1-11 , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 1C 11 1 1 1 / - 1 CCC 1 0001 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CCCCC I Y IY I ooCCL J-�f—II 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 Ir-11 I 1 1 [L r�C I. 0 o �D�CCCI i 11' '11' '11' '11' '11' '11' '11' '11' '11' '11' '11' '11' '11' '11' '11' '11' '11' '11' '11' '11' '11' '11' '11' '11' '11' '11' '11' '11' '11 1 11 1 1 1 - >- r_ 1 CC: I 1 I 22 WALK-IN COOLER/FREEZER FINISH TO BE COMPLETED BY MANUFACTURER. Jo CCClrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr 1 / E-rrI ., LANDSCAPE OR Fs 000' ',"," ","," ","," ","," ","," ","," ","," ","," ","," ", CCCCC� CCC== �0� 1 1 E 1 1 FREESTANDING 23 METAL RAILING SUPPLIED AND INSTALLED BY G.0(ONLY IF REQUIRED).ARCHITECT TO COORDINATE WITH CIVIL ENGINEER ON THE 3=1 CCClrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrlIIIII tit ° UTILITY SCREEN SITE PLAN.PAINT FINISH'BLACK'. CCClrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr LLLLL G Q 3o� 11 C1 00o CCCCCE \ �� Q 70�1 u u u u u u u u II u u u II u 1r u u �1 u u u u u u u u u u u u 1 1 1 L _i_i I ii Q JD�C1 COo 1 .11' '11' '11' '1II '1II '1II '1II '1II '1II '1II 'I' '1II '1II '11° _11 I '1II '1II '1II '1II '1II '1II '1II '1II '1II '1II '1II '1II '1II 1 I 1 I \ 24 PRE-FINISHED GALVANIZED STEEL DOWNSPOUT&COLLECTOR BOX.G.C.TO COORDINATE CIVIL ENGINEERS TO CONFIRM IF Jo 00o LLLLLL L-LLL DOWNSPOUTS ARE SPLASHING ON CONCRETE PAD OR TIED TO THE STORM SEWER LINE. REFER TO MECHANICAL DRAWINGS. �f-11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 I 1 11 I] 11 If C1 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 1 1 1 A I 1: 1 1 I o0o CCCCC� A CCCC= ioti1 u r u �1 i-1_ _i_ CCCI 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 :I :I :I 1 1 1 I_ 1 1 1 1 1 'oti1 ° 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 25 ALL BASE FLASHING TO MATCH ADJACENT MATERIAL COLORS. o �01 ------------� �L LLLL LLLL,_ �� T/O CONC.SLAB 0'-0" N I A v A\ n 26 HOSE BIB.G.C.TO PAINT.COLOUR TO MATCH ADJACENT STUCCO COORDINATE EXACT LOCATION WITH G.C.REFER TO 1\ MECHANICAL DRAWINGS. n 27 Y2"X 1/2"REVEAL LINE IN STUCCO FINISH.REFER TO DETAIL 3/A5. — I -I 28 NOT USED. L LI LC) 29 G.0 TO PROVIDE CONCRETE CURB ALONG DRIVE-THRU LANE.CURB TO PROJECT 8"FROM FACE OF PANELS AND LENGTH OF CURB C\I 2 4 EB-2 EP-3 31 EP-3 21 36 7 24 25 29 13 EP-4 IS EXTENT OF FEATURE WALL. I`r) TYP. TYP. TYP. 0 30 MURAL GRAPHIC SUPPLY AND INSTALL BY SIGN COMPANY. O '` 1 PROPOSED REAR ELEVATION MATERIAL CALCULATIONS 31 REAR EXIT DOOR, REFER TO POPEYES MASTER SCHEDULE o _ BRICK: 46% A5. SCALE: 1/4"-1'-0" 32 WALL SCONCE SUPPLY AND INSTALL BY SIGN COMPANY. SIDING: 5% 0 33 PRE-FABRICATED CANOPIES W/PRE-WIRED RECESSED LIGHTS ABOVE DRIVE-THRU SUPPLY BY SIGN COMPANY AND INSTALL BY z E I FS: 48% G.C.ALL CANOPIES IN WALL SUPPORT BY G.C.REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. _c GLAZING: 1% 34 VERTICAL SIMULATED WOOD SLATS.REFER TO POPEYES MASTER SCHEDULE. Y S_ 35 WALL SCONCE LIGHTING.REFER TO ELECTRICAL SCHEDULE. I..L n 36 CONCRETE SIDEWALK(BY G.C).REFER TO SITE PLAN. 0 Z __ (f) Lu C 37 HORIZONTAL WOOD GRAIN ENTRANCE CANOPY W/TEAL VERTICAL&HORIZONTAL SUPPORTS SUPPLY BY SIGN COMPANY AND INSTALL BY G.C.PRE-WIRED LED LIGHT GLOBE FIXTURE. 38 2"EIFS PROJECTION @ T/O WALL ♦ , 39 EIFS REVEAL Lu i_U v Z — Q O FC-4 34 10 EP-1 1 EP-1 4 EB-2 18 3 EB-1 11 1 EP-2 1 EP-1 27 5 EP-1 5 EP-1 i 0 C� 22'4" 0 / / Li j Q W Z Z 4' 10" C-D EQ 12'-6 1/2" EQ Et 1- 2 L J 20-0" T/O TOWER / V / / ELCO 0 0 Q 0 W n 19'-0" T/O PARAPET 1 V ]1 11 ��1 �1 ' c u iccccccE ccccccccccccccr V ///�)� J TLIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII III C — \ \ 1 C1 11 11 11 11 11 II II 11 II II II II II II J E 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 ��1 11 1 11 1 11 II II II II II 71 u u u u 1 1 u u 1�1 u I 1 u u u 1[-11 11=11 1C 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 L. -' =-3'9"=O n ==OO��y =====— I I 111CCCCCCE CCCCCCCCCCCCCCC IL_1 1 1 1L_ 71 II II II II III II II MAW II I I u II u Q-II II�1 1C I: I: I: I: I: I: I: I: > :11]II1 1 1 IC 1 :1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I. I.11 11 11 11 I:1 I 11 I. I:JI I: I:JI I.JI I: I:JI I: 11 I. I:JI I: I:JI 11 I: I:JI I: I:11 I.JI I: I:JI I: 11 I: I:JI I: I:11 I.JI I: I:JI I: 11 I. I:JI I: I:JI I.JI I: I:JI I: 11 I. I:JI I: I:JI I.JI I: 11 I. I:JI I: I:JI 11 I: I:JI I: I:11 I.JI I: I:JI I: 11 I: I:JI I: fI 11 11 11 11 11 I I .11 11 11 11 11 I II 11 11 I I 11 I II II 11 II 11 11 11 11 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 lI II II ' I:°1: I.] T IC 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 IC]CIL 1 I :1 :1 :1 :1 I :1 :1 :1 :1 I :1 :1 :1 :1 :1 1 I L■�■ 1 1 1 1 II I I II II II II II I _ 1 1 _ W 1 1: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1. 1 1 1: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1.1 1: 1 1 1 1 1 1: 1 1 1: 1 1 1 1..1 1: 1 1 1 1 1 1. 1 1 1: 1:1 1 1 1 1: 1 1 1: 1 1 1. 1 1 1: 1:1 1 1 1 1: 1 1 1: 1 1 1 1..1 1: 1 1 1 1 1 1: 1 1 1: 1 1 1 1..1 1: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1: 1 1 1 1..1 1: 1 1 1 1 1 1. 1 1 1: 1:1 1 1 1 1: 1 1 1: 1 1 1. 1 1 1: 1: _11-II_V u u 1LJ1 [_ -II C] G I: I I I ==== n�===»========================================================================�- � o�■ - iiil000CCCECCCCCCCCCCCCCCC V V °P J J1 11 u u u u u I I u u u u u 1 - I u u u 1C II V u u 1f— I: I: I: I: I: I: I: - V I T /'� 0 1 1 1 1 1: f 1 1: 1 1 1 I.1 1: f 1 1 1 1 1. f 1 1: f 1 1 1 1: f 1 1: 1 1 1. f 1 1: f 1 1 1 1: f 1 1: 1 1 1 I.1 1: f 1 1 1 1: f 1 1: 1 1 1 I.1 1: f 1 1 1 1: f\1 I: 1 1 1 I.1 1: f 1 1 1 1 1. f 1 1: f 1 1 1 1: f 1 1: 1 1 1. f 1 1: I:11 7 11 .5 i i i i I000[ i LL I II.II IIILy 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 u a u u u 1 1 u u u u u 1 11 u u u u u 1 1 u u u u a u u u ° 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 O W . I . I . I . I . I . I . I . I . I . I . 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 Ln I ]1 u u 1 1 u u u u u u u u u u u u 1 1 u u u 1E II II u u 1C-I: I: I: I: I: I: I: I: I: CoI C�I I C�I 11o111 111o�C�C��° ■ I iiil000CCC�CCCCCCCCCCCCCCC EQ. EQ. EQ. EQ. f� Q u�� 1 - 1 _u o� 1 1 1�1 1 1] 000[ 1111111111111111 11 1 _[ 11 111 I 111 I 111 I: 111 I 111 I: 111 I 111 I 111 I: I:11 I 111 I 111 I: 111 I 111 I: I:11 I 111 I 111 I: 111 I 111 I: 111 I 111 I 111 I: 111 I 111 I: 111 I 111 I 111 I: 111 I 111 I: 111 I 111 I 111 I: I:11 I 111 I 111 I: 111 I 111 I: I:1 1 1 u u u 1�1 u u u u u III II II u u u 1 1 u u u u u u u u ° 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 J 1 1- 1. JJLLLLJL LLLJJLLL JJLLJJJL�JJJLLJJL LLJJLLJL LLLJJLLL JLLLJJLL�JJJLLJJL LJJJL� e- -a-�� - TT�1rnLLL L LLL L L — — — � 14'-0" U/S OF DECK 1 1-' 1 n1 n �1 —1 �� ==��i 11' I II' I II' I II' I II' I II' II II II II II II III II If, II-II- II II 1 11-I' I II C]OC]C_1_1_1_1_1_1_1_CC HIGH POINT 1 1 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 iiiiiiiiiiii II U iiil000[ 1 — @ u u u u u u 1n u_ a 1� �1 II n .1 II II u ° 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 JJJJJJ 1 J 1 JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ 1111 11I1 1111 1111 11I1 11I .... — — . I000LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL n1 �n C 1 EQ EQ EQ EQ �� i�1' 'u' 'u' 'u' '11' '11' 11 ��.�.1r Ti T� ..000CCC�CCCCCCCCCCCC� k\ / / / •/ 13'-5" U/S OF DECK 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i i i I000[ 1 L Revisions: 1 1 1 1 1 L 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 II II 11 11 II 1�11 11 11_. II IC II Ir �I I JJJLJJJJJJJJJJL_cs====JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ III C C C C C C C C C I .... - - - - 000LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL LOW POINT w \ No: Description: Date: 3'-0 »P=P=P=P=P=P=PT»=P=P=P=P=P=P=P=P=P=P=P=P=P=P=P=P=P=P=P=P=P=P=P=P=P=P=P=P=P=P=P=P=P=P=P=P iiiiiiiiiiii .... ■�i -- -000CCCECCCCCCCCCCCCCE CT_D / /1: 1I II II II u u u u u II II II III II _ �I I��- / 1]00[ 1111111111111111L ��■■■■,,] 1 . .•. I��1 ICI I. - Al I I I I I I I I I_ O ouo COC COC ouo COC ouo COC ouo COC ouo ouo COC ouo Coo uo=LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL :I�CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC0= u u u u u u u u u u u u III a 1L II II II II II II II II II II II 1: 1: 1: 1: 1: 1: 1: 1: I: CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC=C0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - CCCE CCCCCCCCCCCCCC N 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _6\ II 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 u u u u u u u u u II II II Imil_ _ ��_ + 9'-0" T/O WINDOWS i/ © � c CCECCCCCCCCCCCCCE �1 u u u u u 1 1 1 �-�_ L .r- �� —1 u 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I C1 u u u u u 1C II II II II II II II II II II-I II I I I I I I I I I / / C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C CCC CCCCCCCCCCCCCC CCCCCCCCCCC =CCCCCCCCCCC . C1 11 11 11 11 11 ....m 1 1 ]♦ �'•V 1� I� )♦ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 1 1 1 1- 1 1 1 1 C1 11 11 11 11 11 1w �I 1 ma �I 11 11 1.1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 T 1 1 III 1 1 1 1 0 (� / // S.M /// / PA. // i A�)/,/ /7/ // /, / j/ , C1 L L 11 11 C it r T1 11 TI I 1 11 11 11 11 11 �1II 1 C CC 1CC 1CC 1CC 1CC 1CC 1CC 1CC =CCC 1CC 1V -CCCCCCCCCCC -CCCCCCCCCCC VV ////// / ( = 1iiii: i1111 CD � r�T 1 111111111111111111L1111111 IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIII �I II II II II II II II II II i I- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC =CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC C1 u u u u 1C II II II II II II II 11 11 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11111111111111111111111111 iiiiiiiiiii , CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCL�. �. �. �. �. �. �. �. � _C= =CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC • C1 u u u u u T� MW ■. �r 1- u u 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r M 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11I� - �� . II 1.. .11 11 :I :I :I :I :I :I :I :I :I :I :I :I :I :I :I :I :I :I :I :I :I :I :I :I II r m 33 C 2 / / / _ ==�=�=�=�=�=�=�=�=�=�� \�\�\�\�\�\C� \�\�\�\�\°cc�r�00000000000000000� _n1 L �uuuuL u_11 1 II , iiiiiiii - iiiiiiiiiii - CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCo=CCCCCCC === = = = = _ oo;J0000000000000000000000000000000000='7'' o / / C1 u u u u u u u. u. a 1a�CCCCC ' 1 u u u u u u u ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 :1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11]00000000000000000000000000000000000000L -' 37 C-2 / =I II II II II II II II II 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11=II CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC = = = = = = C === = = = = c- '"000000000000000000000000000000000000r °' Prod. No.: 083257 1 u u u u u u u u u u u u 1 1 u u u u u 1C II-II [ C7OCCCCC]C]C]C]C]C]C]C]C]C]C]C]C]C]C]C] ■ i CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCo CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC_CC ICIC IC IC IC IC IC IC IC IC IC IC IC IC IC IC IC IC IC IC IC IC IC IC IC IC IC IC IC IC IC IC IC IC IC IC IC IC]r Date: 10/21/22 =1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I1 11 I I I I III 1 I I I I I I I I I I I III 1 I I I I 11 1 1 ]00000000000000000000000000000000000000L n (/r \ C1 u u u u u u u u u u u u p J1 u u u u u u L1 L1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1—p 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° / / - C C C C C C C C C C CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCOCCCCCCCCCCCCC === = = = = - 000000000000000000000000000000000000000r ,1 u u u u u 10 I1-I1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 C 1 I-1I-1I-1I-1I-1I-1I-1I-1I-1I-1I-1I-1I-1I-1I-1I-1I-1I-1f DO / ■ 1 � CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC��==��==��= C000000000000000000000000000000000000000 C1 u u u u u u u u u u u u p 1 u u u u u u Ti Ti 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1� 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rrrrrrrrrrrrr 11111111 �11111111111n000000000000000000L A— L1 u u u u u u u u u u u u 1l1 u u u u u u L1 L1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ° iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiiIII C C C C C C C C C C CCCCC C C CCCCC ========CCCCCCCCCCCCC CCCCCCCCCOCCCCCCCCCCC o00000000000000000r Drawn by: RC �// 1 1�1 1C II_II [ /l]C]C]C]C]C]C]C]C]C] N 1 —CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC_CCCCCCCC=CCCCCCCCCCCC000000000000000000CIE - T/O CONC. LAB11 / 1� 1 1 1 1�� 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 11 1 111 111 111 11 1 1 CCCCCCCCLC cccccccccLccccccccLcccccccccc000000000000000000L • I P. ,i. N C\I < o Sheet Name: C\I \ I I C \ - EXTERIOR N 23 2 6 7 36 DP 1 25 m 32 28 �7 4 EB-2 EP-3 ELEVATIONS I TYP. TYP. TYP. TYP. TYP. 0 O 2 PROPOSED SIDE ELEVATION MATERIAL CALCULATIONS o BRICK: 63% Sheet No: o A5.1 SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" EIFS: 16% GLAZING: 21% A5 . 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11 ♦ / TAG MATERIAL APPLICATION SOURCE PRODUCT COLOR DIMENSION VENDOR EXTERIOR W O O L P E R T EF-1 EXTERIOR WOOD SIDING FRONT FACADE EXTERIOR WALLS NICHIHA FIBER CEMENT VINTAGE WOOD AWP 3030 CEDAR 17-7/8"H X 119-5/16"L MATT STEPHENSON ARCHITECTURE I ENGINEERING I GEOSPATIAL 770.789.8229 1815 South Meyers Road POPEYES@NICHIHA.COM y BRICK Suite 950 cr EB-1 BRICK(CLIP SYSTEM) ACCENT TOWER BRICK NICHIHA FIBER CEMENT VINTAGE BRICK ALEXANDRIA BUFF 7-3/8"X 2-1/2"X 3/4" MATT STEPHENSON Oakbrook Terrace, IL 60181 -0 770.789.8229 0• 630.424.9080 POPEYES@NICHIHA.COM Q EB-2 BRICK(CLIP SYSTEM) FRONT OF BUILDING NICHIHA FIBER CEMENT VINTAGE BRICK WHITE WASH,SEE ELEVATIONS FOR 7-3/8"X 2-1/2"X 3/4" MATT STEPHENSON FAX: 630.495.3731 I PAINT COLOR 770.789.8229 POPEYES@NICHIHA.COM PAINT J EP-1 EXTERIOR PAINT MAIN WALL SURFACE BENJAMIN MOORE ULTRA SPEC EXT LOW OC-125 MOONLIGHT WHITE RODGER LIPPMAN �� C LUSTRE(N455) 848.702.0239 RODGER.LIPPMAN@BENJAMINMOORE.COM RODGER.LIPPMAN@BENJAMINMOORE.COM_I 0_0_ EP-2 EXTERIOR PAINT BRICK TOWER PARAPET BENJAMIN MOORE ULTRA SPEC EXT LOW 2105-20 ROOT BEER CANDY RODGER LIPPMAN QO LUSTRE(N455) 848.702.0239 2 RODGER.LIPPMAN@BENJAMINMOORE.COM &3 O o EP-3 EXTERIOR PAINT DUMPSTER WALLS,REAR DOOR BENJAMIN MOORE ULTRA SPEC EXT LOW HC-170 STONINGTON GREY RODGER LIPPMAN 0 LUSTRE(N455) 848.702.0239 RODGER.LIPPMAN@BENJAMINMOORE.COM i 01 EP-4 METAL PAINT BOLLARDS BENJAMIN MOORE COROTECH HIGH SOLIDS SAFETY YELLOW RODGER LIPPMAN • ^ RAPID DRY ENAMEL 848.702.0239 RODGER.LIPPMAN@BENJAMINMOORE.COM 0 RODGER.LIPPMAN@BENJAMINMOORE.COM A - EP-5 METAL PAINT DUMPSTER GATES AND PYLON BENJAMIN MOORE COROTECH HIGH SOLIDS FACTORY FINISH BLACK RODGER LIPPMAN O POLE RAPID DRY ENAMEL 848.702.0239 Q RODGER.LIPPMAN@BENJAMINMOORE.COMTO D EP-6 ANIT GRAFFITI COAT EXTERIOR WALLS BENJAMIN MOORE ALIPHATIC ACRYLIC V500-00 CLEAR RODGER LIPPMAN e eS CD I URETHANE-GLOSS 848.702.0239 RODGER.LIPPMAN@BENJAMINMOORE.COM 400 PERIMETER CENTER TERRACE EP-7 INTERIOR PAINT RESTROOM WALLS BENJAMIN MOORE ULTRA SPEC EXT LOW OC-669 OCEANIC TEAL RODGER LIPPMAN• SUITE 1000 0 LUSTRE(N455) 848.702.0239 Q RODGER.LIPPMAN@BENJAMINMOORE.COM ATLANTA, GA 30346 MISC 404-459-4450 0 N- C-1 CANOPY-METAL DRIVE THRU WINDOW CANOPY PROVIDED BY MANUFACTURER PROVIDED BY MANUFACTURER ORANGE.PANTONE#3564 C PROVIDED BY MANUFACTURER ZC-2 CANOPY-METAL BUILDING CANOPIES PROVIDED BY MANUFACTURER PROVIDED BY MANUFACTURER TEAL.PANTONE#326 C PROVIDED BY MANUFACTURER S-1 SHUTTERS-POPPY EXTERIOR WALLS REAR OF PROVIDED BY MANUFACTURER PROVIDED BY MANUFACTURER PROVIDED BY MANUFACTURER PROVIDED BY MANUFACTURER T BUILDING — a) — 0 DP-1 DOOR MAIN ENTRANCE DOORS PROVIDED BY MANUFACTURER PROVIDED BY MANUFACTURER ORANGE.PANTONE#3564 C PROVIDED BY MANUFACTURER > INTERIOR CEILING d Q ACT-1G ACOUSTICAL CEILING TILE DINING ROOM ARMSTRONG ULTIMA COLOR:WHITE 24"X 48" CHERYL B.SMITH FINISH:FINE TEXTURE 252.214.4426 I GRID:9/16"BEVELED TEGULAR CBSMITH@ARMSTRONGCEILINGS.COM cn ACT-2G ACOUSTICAL CEILING TILE BACK OF HOUSE GC/USG INTERIORS SHEETROCK CLIMAPLUS COLOR:3270 WHITE 24"X 48"X 1/2" CHERYL B.SMITH CD VINYL FINISH:SMOOTH 252.214.4426 CBSMITH@ARMSTRONGCEILINGS.COM CV o FLOORING — 0_ TL-1 BASE TILE WALL BASE CREATIVE MATERIALS BUSINESS-SLATE 2.0 COLOR:MATTE 6"X 24" CREATIVE MATERIALS CORPORATION CORPORATION GROUT:ULTRACOLOR PLUS IRON THICKNESS:10.5MM 1-800-207-2967 EXT.7797 I) #107 POPEYESTILE@CREATIVEMATERIALSCORP.COM N inTL-2 TILE DINING ROOM FLOOR AND CREATIVE MATERIALS BUSINESS-SLATE 2.0 FINISH:NATURAL/CLEFTED 24"X 24" CREATIVE MATERIALS CORPORATION 00 RESTROOM WALLS CORPORATION BODY:PORCELAIN GLAZED COLOR BODY THICKNESS:10.5MM 1-800-207-2967 EXT.7797 O GROUT:ULTRACOLOR PLUS IRON#107 POPEYESTILE@CREATIVEMATERIALSCORP.COM TL-3 TILE RESTROOM FLOOR TILE CREATIVE MATERIALS BUSINESS-SLATE 2.0 FINISH:NATURAL/CLEFTED 12"X 24" CREATIVE MATERIALS CORPORATION l_ CORPORATION BODY:PORCELAIN GLAZED COLOR BODY THICKNESS:10.5MM 1-800-207-2967 EXT.7797 0 GROUT:ULTRACOLOR PLUS IRON#107 POPEYESTILE@CREATIVEMATERIALSCORP.COM CD a) TL-4 WALL TILE FRONT SERVICE COUNTER CREATIVE MATERIALS SUBWAY TILE/PAINTED COLOR:WHITE 2.5"X 9.5" CREATIVE MATERIALS CORPORATION Z WALLS CORPORATION BRICK FINISH:GLOSSY THICKNESS:11MM 1-800-207-2967 EXT.7797 GROUT:ULTRACOLOR PLUS RAIN#101 POPEYESTILE@CREATIVEMATERIALSCORP.COM " yv �_ TL-5 WALL TILE RESTROOM ACCENT BAND- CREATIVE MATERIALS BOON AND BEAMING COLOR:WHITE 4.25"X 8.5" CREATIVE MATERIALS CORPORATION — *L7 BLANK SPACES CORPORATION FINISH:MATTE 1-800-207-2967 EXT.7797 12 0 GROUT:POPEYES CUSTOM COLOR POPEYESTILE@CREATIVEMATERIALSCORP.COM TL-6 WALL TILE RESTROOM ACCENT BAND-TEAL CREATIVE MATERIALS CUSTOM POPEYES COLOR:WHITE 4.25"X 8.5" CREATIVE MATERIALS CORPORATION 0 Z CD LETTERS CORPORATION LETTER LOGO TILE SETS FINISH:MATTE 1 800 207 2967 EXT.7797 (f) w I— LETTERING FONT:CHICKEN SANS POPEYESTILE@CREATIVEMATERIALSCORP.COM uj A GROUT AND LETTERS TO MATCH COLOR:BM OC-669 -I--, "OCEANIC TEAL" ' ` C 61 CQ RESIN FLOORING BACK OF HOUSE FLOORS AND SILIKAL ACRYLIC RESIN COLOR:QUARTZ BLEND#4 MARK FELDMAN w I..I...I v WALL BASE INTEGRAL COVE BASE CELL:775.772.2797 7 O OFFICE:770.830.1404 Z MFELDMAN@SILIKALAMERICA.COM 0 O 2oBRICK — Q wz ow w z 1E BR-1 BRICK(CLIP SYSTEM) DINING ROOM ACCENT WALLS NICHIHA FIBER CEMENT VINTAGE BRICK WHITE WASH PAINTED P-1 7-3/8"X 2-1/2"X 3/4" MATT STEPHENSON i U 770.789.8229 Z 12 11 H `/ POPEYES@NICHIHA.COM Q LJ PAINT0 — o w �^ � J C PT-1 INTERIOR PAINT INTERIOR WALLS,BEADBOARD, BENJAMIN MOORE ULTRA SPEC 500 OC-068 DISTANT GRAY RODGER LIPPMAN V IMC) Q > BRICK WALLS AND EGGSHELL 848.702.0239 LU SOFFITS/CEILING RODGER.LIPPMAN@BENJAMINMOORE.COM j LLB U7 PT-2 METAL PAINT MAIN ENTRANCE DOORS BENJAMIN MOORE COROTECH HIGH SOLIDS 2133-20 BLACK JACK RODGER LIPPMAN I M O LC) a INTERIOR FRAME RAPID DRY ENAMEL 848.702.0239 Q RODGER.LIPPMAN@BENJAMINMOORE.COM N PT-3 INTERIOR PAINT ORANGE BRICK ACCENT WALL BENJAMIN MOORE ULTRA SPEC 500 091 TANGERINE MELT RODGER LIPPMAN E EGGSHELL 848.702.0239 — O RODGER.LIPPMAN@BENJAMINMOORE.COM C a) PT-4 INTERIOR PAINT RESTROOM WALLS BENJAMIN MOORE ULTRA SPEC 500 OC-669 OCEANIC TEAL RODGER LIPPMAN A Revisions: I..I: EGGSHELL 848.702.0239 No: Description: Date: 4 RODGER.LIPPMAN@BENJAMINMOORE.COM I PT-5 INTERIOR PAINT RESTROOM DOOR FRAME BENJAMIN MOORE ULTRA SPEC 500 1127 SEDONA BROWN RODGER LIPPMAN EGGSHELL 848.702.0239 +N-- RODGER.LIPPMAN@BENJAMINMOORE.COM . C MISC o F-1 BEADBOARD DINING ROOM ACCENT WALLS GC BEADBOARD PANELING PAINTED PT-1 4"CHANNEL BEAD 1/8"X 1/8" GC 0 . C COWT-1 WALL TILE DINING ROOM ACCENT WALLS CREATIVE MATERIALS MOTIVATE COLOR;WALNUT 8"X 40"9MM CREATIVE MATERIALS CORPORATION — CORPORATION FINISH:NATURAL 1-800-207-2967 EXT.7797 I POPEYESTILE@CREATIVEMATERIALSCORP.COM Proj. No.: 083257 L-1 RESTROOM DOOR FACES INTERIOR DOOR LAMINATE GC LAMINATE MOCHA MODERN CHERRY- GC E W465EV Date: 10/21/22 a d- SOLID SURFACES Drawn by: RC W-1 FRP SHEET BACK OF HOUSE WALLS MARLITE FRP SHEET COLOR:P100-WHITE I FINISH:PEBBLE N N Sheet ame: 0 N — MASTER FINISH N REDUCE I. 0 0 -6 Sheet No: a) L_ AIO . 1 TAG I QTY I SCIENTIFIC NAME I COMMON NAME COND. I SIZE REMARKS I PRICE PERMANENT SEED BLEND 1 1 N TREE 90% FINE LEAF FESCUE (FESTUCA ARUNDINACEA) LANDSCAPE NOTES AF 4 Acer x freemanii'Armstrong' Armstrong Red Maple B&B 2.5"cal. 14'ht.4'wd Full,well shaped $590 $2,360 REBEL, REBEL II, WRANGLER, BONANZA, MOJAVE PG 8 Picea glauca'Densata' Black Hills Spruce B&B 2.5"cal.6-8'ht.4'wd Full,well shaped $618 $4,944 OR EQUAL I 1 . LOCATING AND PROTECTING ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, PRIOR TO 10% KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS (POA PRATENSIS) II DIGGING, IS RESPONSIBILITY OF THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. EVERGREEN SHRUB MIDNIGHT, RUGBY II, MIDIRON VARIETIES OR 2. PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT BU 54 Buxus x'Glencoe' Chicagoland Green Boxwood #5 cont. 36"ht.x 36"wd. Full,vigorous $90 EQUAL THE SUB GRADE, GENERAL SITE CONDITIONS, VERIFY ELEVATIONS, UTILITY $4,860 98% PURITY AND 85% GERMINATION LOCATIONS, IRRIGATION, APPROVE TOPSOIL PROVIDED BY GENERAL I IG 76 Ilex glabra'Shamrock' Shamrock Inkberry Holly #5 cont. 36"ht.x 24"wd. Full,vigorous $70 $5,320 95% WEED FREE I CONTRACTOR AND OBSERVE THE SITE CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH THE N 10 17 Ilex x'Red Beauty' Red Beauty Holly #3 cont. 36"ht.x 24"wd. Full,vigorous $100 $1,70o I WORK IS TO BE DONE. NOTIFY GENERAL CONTRACTOR OF ANY -� UNSATISFACTORY CONDITIONS. WORK SHALL NOT PROCEED UNTIL SUCH CA 42 Clethra alnifolia Summersweet Clethra #5 cont. 36"ht.x 36"wd. Full,vigorous $50 $2,100 1 CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN CORRECTED AND ARE ACCEPTABLE TO THE 1 1I LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR AND/OR CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. GROUNDCOVER 3. GENERAL AND LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR SEED 4,975 SF $0.25/SF $1,243 PROTECTING EXISTING TREES FROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION. I GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL TREE PROTECTION FENCING PRIOR TO APPROXIMATE ESTIMATED BUILDING VALUE: +/-$900,000.00 2.5% BUILDING VALUE=+/-$22,500.00 PLANT MATERIAL REQUIRED TOTAL PLANT MATERIAL COST: +/-$22,527.00 ANY SITE WORK. 1 I 4. ALL SHRUB AND GROUNDCOVER BEDS TO BE MULCHED WITH A MINIMUM _ OF 3 INCHES OF CLEAN SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. V V \\ 5. PLANTING HOLES TO BE DUG A MINIMUM OF TWICE THE WIDTH THE SIZE Z u) cn i 1 1 1 11 1 I OF THE ROOT BALL OF BOTH SHRUB AND TREE. AMEND BACKFILL WITH 0 z z TOPSOIL MIX. BACKFILL AND TAMP BOTTOM OF HOLE PRIOR TO N w w / I II PLANTING SO TOP OF ROOT BALL DOES NOT SETTLE BELOW 5 m / 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 y cc 11 I 0 SURROUNDING GRADE. www 0 - I 6. TOPSOIL MIX TO BE 4 PARTS SCREENED TOPSOIL AND 1 PART ORGANIC - II MATERIAL (i.e. NATURE'S HELPER OR PRO MIX). 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 7. EXISTING GRASS IN PROPOSED PLANTING AREAS TO BE REMOVED AND c.) c) 1 11 AREA TO BE HAND RAKED TO REMOVE ALL ROCKS AND DEBRIS LARGER o' 1 / // 0 THAN 1 INCH IN DIAMETER PRIOR TO PLANTING SHRUBS. A / �� ii III 8. SOIL TO BE TESTED TO DETERMINE FERTILIZER AND LIME REQUIREMENTS. 0 0 LIME AND FERTILIZER TO BE DISTRIBUTED PRIOR TO LAYING SOD. ALL II DISTURBED AREAS (INCLUDING RIGHT-OF-WAYS) NOT RECEIVING 5 I PLANTINGS TO RECEIVE 4 INCHES OF TOPSOIL AND SODDED. w w II 9. SOD TO BE DELIVERED FRESH (CUT LESS THAN 24 HOURS PRIOR TO cL I ARRIVING ON SITE), LAID IMMEDIATELY, ROLLED AND WATERED w II THOROUGHLY WITHIN ONE HOUR OF INSTALLATION. o POPEYES I 10. ALL CHANGES TO DESIGN AND/OR PLANT SUBSTITUTIONS TO BE ap MONUMENT SIGN I II AUTHORIZED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. - 11. o 0 ALL PARKING ISLANDS TO BE BERMED UP 6"-10" WITH CLEAN FRIABLE o Q j I I TOPSOIL PRIOR TO PLANTING. z o I I I I I I I I I I I o / 12. ALL LANDSCAPING SHALL BE INSTALLED IN CONFORMANCE WITH ANSI 4 / IA I I Z60.1 THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK, AND THE cv • 1 1 1 1 1 11 I I ACCEPTED STANDARDS OF AMERICANHORT. j II 1 13. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL GUARANTEE ALL PLANTS INSTALLEDor - I� - I� _I� _ � I __J _ _l L � - FOR ONE FULL YEAR FROM DATE OF ACCEPTANCE BY THE OWNER. ALL Z N PLANTS SHALL BE ALIVE AND AT A VIGOROUS RATE OF GROWTH AT THE NNo � ,. (5) EXISTING TREESNII ' I ,? TO REMAIN END OF THE GUARANTEE PERIOD. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL v o -) o I-I I I I I ��. 7Z 1 NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ACTS OF GOD OR VANDALISM. wI► I► 4 w 1 `�� , � re1 14. ANY PLANT THAT IS DETERMINED DEAD, IN AN UNHEALTHY OR UNSIGHTLY°' I Dy, . vo��►► �'1g' 0 I I CONDITION, LOST ITS SHAPE DUE TO DEAD BRANCHES OR OTHER Q w Y I I I I I •p ° ,, � ` ito%, ,�. 0 I I I SYMPTOMS OF POOR, NON-VIGOROUS GROWTH SHALL BE REPLACED BY 0- 0 0 CI U �O� ° o ;; _ THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR WITH THE COST OF THE REPLACEMENTo � � ° � .,. �,, `� I INCLUDED IN THE BID OR PROPOSAL PRICE. • 6 o •=.t& �► LANDSCAPED YARDa ► !� 15. WATER THOROUGHLY TWICE IN THE FIRST 24 HOURS AND APPLY MULCH co 0 ° ° V �-,i PLANTING, TYP. IMMEDIATELY. ao1(17) 10 ::14.:: ° �- - - UT - - - - - - - - - - - - - UT - - - - � - II 0 o CL o ( �5) CA - - III (21) BU I 0 co N a) 1 (1 0) CAI ° ' ° c - - �- - --- c - - - - - - c --- --- c --- -� I II u7 11 �� , / _. �_ ° --- -- --12"SD-+>---12"SD - - I a) c) M `�' 1 0 __ TREE PROTECTION I L ai o \,___./ o a �ivp,'jr,,,`� I 4 . f' ' ' FENCE, TYP. M II 0 II a) o 0 1 1 1 r � °� , ' I PLANTING REQUIREMENTS t ~ Co 1 1 1 1 1 1 ° � I 0 CD m At r #/ 4 4 1 � IC � / N Landscaped Yard: (.0 s- 0 cO 4LI ° �� ,�% °��• • • •�•;��•�`�`�`�`�`�`�`;` � J A Mill 4IIII I LJ A landscaped yard shall be installed and maintained along Co '= 2 M < ° p \�/ �•�!,,' a ! I 0 __< 1 all public streets. °' 1 o ��- (15) IG �� I 11 I Z z 4.6' . ;�� C _ ` ?, This yard shall be at least five feet in depth from the 1- Q I I o z �;' trig PROPOSED o �� % k23) B I I public right-of-way for all properties abutting Cedar z :_1(147(1,.._10 RESTAURANT .�� 4Q II (10) BU u wIX Avenue south of 140th Street and for all properties a 1 °' /, (8) PG 1�11 2,519 SF iI ��;;d ! � !: \ �. abutting 150th Street west of Pilot Knob Road, but east W 0 -0 o I _iI l! dl a 1i (PROTOTYPE #2124) I- o --- r� "':' ° 1 Ve / •t /5 IO of 147th Street. This yard shall be at least 15 feet in z J WTR WTR WTR ��: !- �� °WTf, i�p° 4 a W ��co 0 w 1 _ (10) BU (7) CA r 0- I depth along all other streets, measured from the public Z 1- IIL 4'A=` Y.► , / - - �.. right-of-way. The measurement shall be determined as J Z I' . i i W 1 ,- - Q 1 ;�� ° ��► ° �'�� ., -_� d .tl / 't of the time that the permit for construction or W LO N �: d W the and O M r ��4 °� \ ` ° _ ° � d ° / a = improvement is issued. Except for driveways, y IN 4 ° e I shall extend along both streets in the case of a corner 0IL, o / I I [WC Pillar, . �::... st3o. Z Ilot. a W I 1 , \ I 0 i - -�i�_.' 10 I I I Trash Enclosure Screening I I I LI I n`\�„ ��r/��q,,< --8"SAN--G�--8"SAN I '� :ii 1 ,0: o 0I j O�e W Uk��+�+�+`,.- 'MI ____ _ - _ _ - _ y� G 0 a In all zoning districts, all waste material, debris, refuse orN• O o a Z W 4471. ITV '' • • . �• •�• .y �� . �L Y►iAi5%��O V" . .0`+� • b Ce I ICIC garbage shall be kept in an enclosed building or enclosed cq .5 ' -+ o - 1 a II within a container. The container shall be completely I- Co D CL ZO/ (4) AF (50) IG N2 S I 0 I II screened by a wall or an equivalent visual screen. The O I W I screen or enclosed building shall be architecturally I- d I LANDSCAPED YARD _ I V I compatible with the principal building it serves. CO cn '°- i PLANTING, TYP. ® ;;*I 1 0 I I I 1 Total Landscape Material Value (n W 1 0 g I I I I Z W CV I in o / II 1 I II The minimum cost of landscaping materials for the plan Z Z L 71 j I� /0 shall be a percentage of the estimated building Q 000 In z19 '9 d I / construction cost based on current means construction J < iii - /I data as follows: 2 0 p Z ,- 1 1 1 1 I I I I a M cn Q X I - Commercial Building: , z - - - - - - - - - - 2.5% Cost of Building Allocated to Landscape Materials 1-1-1 a �' I i I I I I I I I I I I I I Z Q a_ / m �� Anticipated Building Value: +/-$900,000 W J z } Q 0 'E 1 / 0. 1 I I I I 1 II 1 I Required Landscape Material Value: +/-$22/ & 1 1 1 1 -g 1 1 - ,500 J > I- W Q a 0 I e W > >, / 1- Q I I , I I I I I 1 A / '° > Q 0_ 0V0 o I t 0Um' WQ / i i V CO a) N ci Ipr 1 L a a r ' a• N 0 i I WZ Z (1) / / re MI Q CY)Q o E1 I ; I 4: .;" 1 TREE WRAP _ Qo Q• d mI V / '9 1 I I Ap�� F/ ��//m;, 3 INCHES MULCH W-o ro I 3" MULCH 00" '�1W �I, niIII CIS 4 INCH DEEP SAUCER W 0z z I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 „��"�.,:;oa 1 a N _C t1 n I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I i I I I II CREATE 4" SAUCER iii __ Z . '",�,e..e�u�.griiii W a c _ _ _ 3 INCHES MULCH �„ iii , }}}}f}}�fllf �- ��utia .041i I/ -,,,,ft„ �! ill ll NOW //�► 2 SEE LANDSCAPE NOTESIN -I_: __:::-:EE,,:: 'j r}'_. et rug 1 , BACKFILL MIX V� I- I- I I 1 1 1 II 1 FOR TYPE OF MULCH " " ^'' \ UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL FE ro I :7' �� .`%.�ro. -i SPECIFIED PLANTING „ f w Z o N IF SHRUB IS B & B, THEN REMOVE UPPER fflj �ij` ,,g %„..•;,ail z\/ I 1/3 OF BURLAP ikii_;;:_••i!! !i MIX. WATER & TAMP a cn z 12 REMOVE BURLAP & ROPE - - �!!�._ HIE- TO REMOVE AIR REMOVE BURLAP & ROPE 0 CV ( 1 g `O FROM TOP 1/3 OF BALL ill FROM TOP 1/3 OF THE BALL O N SUBGRADE POCKETS \ , BACKFILL MIX a os- I UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL NOTES: U o 0, 0 I 1. SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES FOR THE TYPE OF MULCH MATERIAL TO USE. NOTE: SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES FOR THE 6 o E / 1 TYPE OF MULCH MATERIAL TO USE. Know what's below. SHEET NO. 0 m 1 1 i I Call before you dig. Zw SHRUB PLANTING EVERGREEN PLANTING DETAIL TREE PLANTING _0 -0 o I 0 20 40 60 1_ > , -1 4 1 I I I I I I I I I N.T.S. N.T.S. N.T.S. -�-� C500 ., u o j GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 3 3 SEPTEMBER 20, 2022 Alex Sharpe I�`J G Planning and Economic Development Specialist City of Apple Valley 7100 147th St W, Apple Valley, MN 55124 RE: SEPARATION BUFFER VARIANCE APPLICATION NARRATIVE TLM COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT - 7575 153RD STREET W, APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA Alex, Thank you for reviewing the following project description and variance request for the TLM Apple Valley project.The subject property is located at Apple Valley Square at 7575 153rd Street West(PID: 01-11783-01-020)on an existing 6.94 acre parcel and is currently zoned RB - Retail Business.A description of the currently proposed project follows along with a narrative specific for a reduction to the buffer distance between the proposed use and residential. PROJECT DESCRIPTION TLM Realty is proposing to split and replat the parking lot of Lot 2, Block 1 portion of the Apple Valley Square 4th Addition to create an additional lot in the northeastern portion of the site to facilitate development of a Popeye's. Proposed site improvements include installation of an underground on-site stormwater system, utilities, and site grading. It is expected that the existing parking stalls within the newly created lot will need to be removed to allow construction of the Popeyes. Further,the remaining parking areas within the parcel will need to be restriped to accommodate the proposed layout and parking, and parking islands will be constructed to meet current landscaping standards.A separate variance request has been filed for this property for a parking reduction. Apple Valley Realty, LLC is the landowner, located at 295 Madison Avenue, 37th floor, New York, NY 10017.The primary contact from Apple Valley Realty is Michael Oestreich and he can be reached at 212.753.4576 and at mikeo@tlmltd.com. ISG, located at 7900 International Drive, Suite 550, Bloomington, MN 55425, is the engineering and architectural firm, as well as the surveyor.The primary contact from ISG is Claire Roth, and she can be reached at 952.426.0699 and at Claire.Roth@ISGInc.com. VARIANCE NARRATIVE Popeye's is considered a Class II Restaurant Use,which is allowed as a Conditional Use in the Retail Business(RB)zone district if it is located no closer than 1,000 feet from a residential or institutional use(Section 155.157 (H). While the proposed Popeye's restaurant complies with the separation buffer requirement to the north, east and west of its site, it would be approximately 400-ft from existing residential to the south. Therefore, in accordance with the following findings,Apple Valley Minnesota Realty, LLC requests a variance to allow for a reduction of the minimum separation distance of 1,000 from a Class II restaurant to residential as stated in Section 155.157 (H)of the City Zoning Code. 155.397 (b) In considering a request for a variance and whether the applicant established that there are practical difficulties in complying with provision(s)of this chapter,the Board and City Council shall consider the following factors: (i)Special conditions apply to the structures or land in question that are particular to the property and do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district or vicinity in which the land is located. This request is unique because the surrounding existing conditions serve as a sufficient separation buffer to ensure the existing residential is not negatively impacted by the proposed use. Between the proposed Popeye's restaurant and the residential to the south is an existing Arby's (another Class II restaurant that is only - 200-ft separated from the residential), 153rd St W (approximately 60-ft of right-of way),and then a robust- 140-ft of landscaped area between 153rd St W and the residential that 7900 International Drive+Suite 550+Bloomington,MN 55425 952.426.0699+ISGInc.com Architecture+Engineering+Environmental+Planning ISG includes a line of trees,then a detention pond, and then another line of mature trees. Below is an aerial photo showing these existing conditions that separate the Popeye's site to the existing residential. (Yellow= Proposed Popeye's, Orange= Existing Type II Restaurants within 1,000-ft of residential, Blue = Residential) gmall " • - , 1V\V r. ®®-- 1i+:.11 1.l I W.),., anera Bread �,7,,,, ' F R ,• { reef + yt � ,1l • I : —kr r_ �_e ._ C! I W'F...-.._' {y, , Welgreens' b' , Y er • _ ...,,,,_ , lansa•milow_153'd St1W _rre. —... — - A Q ' T iriio ,i • Th 'b 444 Ali l • - - _' + - ,.� k= _- I. L� 4 ii a- Hun ling ion �� .. 4yf - a ( _ I:.++r\ J�' ;y i. A7M(Wal. l�� egery02G22 ONES/AVWS,Mom Techrnbglas,li.S.Gealoglca Survey,NSGA/FPAC/GEO,Map data 02022 , .. .... [. .'RU,' 2 3/t - "____. Additionally, included is a site photo from the Popeye's site looking south to the residential. The residential is not visible because the Arby's building(the white structure) blocks any visibility between Popeye's and the residential. Arby's will also serve as a buffer to any noise generated from the Popeye's site as well. 11111111111111,.1 II -. _ .,:, ` , �_.. ., r _[III -.+✓ - -- — - mg Page 2 of 3 952.426.0699+ISGInc.com ISG In addition, it is important to note the traffic memo concluded there are no impacts from the proposed Popeye's nor are any street improvements needed to accommodate this additional use. Moreover,the traffic to Popeye's does not encroach into the residential as 153rd Street separates the commercial to the north and residential uses to the south, and the residential is only accessed from Whitney Drive to the south. (ii) The granting of the proposed variance will not be contrary to the intent of this chapter. The granting of this variance request is not contrary to the intent of code Chapter 155: Zoning. The intent of zoning regulations are to protect from incompatible uses mixing and to uphold the public health,safety and welfare of the community. In no way does granting this separation buffer reduction request cause any encroachment of retail/restaurant uses closer to the residences than the existing conditions. As previously mentioned,the Arby's is approximately 200-ft to the north of the residences, acting as a buffer to the residential. Additionally,there are other Class II restaurants that also encroach into the 1,000-ft separation buffer to these residences, and other residences,that have been approved by the City. Specifically, Chick Fil A is located directly east of the residences approximately 150-ft, but was granted a separation buffer reduction variance by the City because the natural separation of uses by Cedar Ave/SH 23. Therefore,the existing buildings and roadways between the residential and Popeye's provide adequate separation of uses. (iii) The special conditions or circumstances do not result from the actions of the owner/applicant. The special conditions do not result from the actions of the owner. The retail uses and residential areas are already established as adjacent uses with less than 1,000-ft of separation buffer from other Type II Restaurants. The large exiting parking lot where Popeye's is proposed is a prime location for a Type II Restaurant, adjacent to a high-traffic arterial road, and fully within an existing retail development. (iv) The granting of the variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but is necessary to alleviate practical difficulties in complying with the zoning provisions of this Code. The variance to allow for the separation buffer reduction is necessary to allow for not just Popeye's but any Type II restaurant in this location. (v) The variance requested is the minimum variance necessary to alleviate the practical difficulty. The variance requested is the minimum necessary to allow for the proposed use to locate on the new lot. Please contact me at 952.426.0699 with any questions or if there is any additional information we can provide in support of this project Sincerely, ,o4177 Claire Roth la Project Coordinator Claire.Roth@ISGInc.com Page 3 of 3 952.426.0699+ISGInc.com SEPTEMBER 21, 2022 Alex Sharpe Planning and Economic Development Specialist City of Apple Valley 7100 147th St W, Apple Valley, MN 55124 RE: PARKING VARIANCE APPLICATION NARRATIVE TLM COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT - 7575 153RD STREET W, APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA Alex, Thank you for reviewing the following project description and variance request for the TLM Apple Valley project.The subject property is located at Apple Valley Square at 7575 153rd Street West(PID: 01-11783-01-020)on an existing 6.94 acre parcel and is currently zoned RB - Retail Business.A description of the currently proposed project follows along with a narrative specific to a variance request regarding parking. PROJECT DESCRIPTION TLM Realty is proposing to split and replat the parking lot of Lot 2, Block 1 portion of the Apple Valley Square 4th Addition to create an additional lot in the northeastern portion of the site to facilitate development of a Popeye's. It is expected that the existing parking stalls within the newly created lot will need to be removed to allow construction of the Popeyes. Proposed site improvements include installation of an underground on-site stormwater system, utilities, and site grading. Further,the remaining parking areas within the parcel will need to be restriped to accommodate the proposed layout and parking, and parking islands will be constructed to meet current landscaping standards. Apple Valley Realty, LLC is the landowner, located at 295 Madison Avenue, 37th floor, New York, NY 10017.The primary contact from Apple Valley Realty is Michael Oestreich and he can be reached at 212.753.4576 and at mikeo@tlmltd.com. ISG, located at 7900 International Drive,Suite 550, Bloomington, MN 55425, is the engineering and architectural firm, as well as the surveyor.The primary contact from ISG is Claire Roth, and she can be reached at 952.426.0699 and at Claire.Roth@ISGlnc.com VARIANCE NARRATIVE The development for Popeyes is situated in a portion of an existing parking lot that is associated with a general retail center. As a result,there will be a reduction of parking spaces associated with the retails center, bringing the current site out of compliance with code section 155.379 (0). Thus, a variance from the minimum parking requirement is requested. The current retail site consists of ALDI, Burlington and a vacant space,totaling 72,716 SF of actual retail area and 405 parking spaces. Therefore,the existing parking ratio is 5.6 spaces/1,000 SF of actual retail area.The Popeye's development proposes to subdivide the property so that a portion of the parking lot will become a separate lot for Popeyes. Popeye's will be on the proposed Lot 1 and the existing retail will be on the proposed Lot 2. The proposed platting and development of Popeye's would result in Popeye's having 18 spaces, when only 8 are required, and the existing retail area to have 322 parking spaces, when 397 spaces are required by code. This would result in a new parking ratio of 4.42 spaces/1,000 SF of actual retail area for the retail uses on Lot 2. The table below summarizes these findings. 7900 International Drive+Suite 550+Bloomington,MN 55425 952.426.0699+ISGInc.com Architecture+Engineering+Environmental+Planning PARKING CALCULATIONS LAND USE CLASSIFICATION(LOT 2) RETAIL STORE(5) PARKING SPACES REQUIRED 1 SPACE PER 150 SF UP TO 20,000 SF, (155.379 0-RETAIL STORE) THEN 1 SPACE PER 200 SF GROSS FLOOR ACTUAL RETAIL AREA AREA[SF[ [SF] ALDI - 12,453 BURLINGTON 55,162 50,148 BURLINGTON UNUSED-FUTURE 11,126 10,115 APPLE VALLEY SQUARE(TOTAL) - 72,716 (20,0001150) +[(72,716-20,000)1200] REQUIRED PARKING SPACES 397 LAND USE CLASSIFICATION(LOT 1) CLASS II RESTAURANT PARKING SPACES REQUIRED 1 SPACE PER 3 SEATS (155.379 P 2) 24 TOTAL SEATS)3= PARKING SPACES REQUIRED 8 SITE TOTALS REQUIRED PROVIDED LOT 1 8 18 LOT 2 397 322 TOTAL 405 340 ISG has conducted a utilization study of the lot which includes the area in front of ALDI and Burlington. Data collection for the study occurred at varying times of the day and it's narrated in detail in the Parking Study of Lot 2, Block 1,Apple Valley Square 4th Addition. It was found that the average parking demand for the retailers is 85 stalls at any given time of day.The largest number of stalls observed to be utilized throughout the 15 observations was 125,which only equates to a rate of 31% occupancy for the lot. The parking study demonstrates that city parking standards dictate that far more parking is necessary than what is being utilized by the customer based on the findings from the study, and by corporate standards of the business themselves,therefore the proposed amount of parking stalls is sufficient for the development. While the study reflects a tenant with low traffic and another vacant tenant, it is still noteworthy that during the peak parking count of 125 utilized spaces,there would still be an excess of 197 vacant spaces of the new 322 parking spaces associated with the retail center. Even with full occupancy on a bustling shopping day, 197 excess spaces would be more than adequate to provide sufficient parking. It is also important to consider how future tenants in the retail center would impact the parking. The most likely tenants other than general retail to occupy the buildings that are permitted in the RB zoned district would be a medical clinic, athletic club/gym or worship center based on past trends. A medical clinic has the same parking requirements as a general retails center so there should be no change in demand, and an athletic club/gym or worship center typically have peak hours opposite of retail (early mornings/late evenings, or Sunday mornings),when the other retail stores are closed or at the lowest traffic counts. Therefore,the reduced parking counts proposed would still be adequate to support a potential mix of different uses beyond the existing retail today. Page 2 of 4 952.426.0699+ISGInc.com ISG Popeye's Restaurants are typically designed with 10- 15 stalls,which has been exceed by providing at least 18 stalls with ease of access to the main door. Further,the design for the new Popeyes, includes a double lane drive-thru which is anticipated to serve a majority of the establishment's customers. Due to the convenience of the drive-thru, It is expected that there will be less customers purchasing their food and utilizing on-site facilities than there will be customers utilizing the drive-thru option and taking it to go. Referencing Table 1, Popeyes will exceed the required number of stalls by code. Similarly to Popeye's Restaurant,ALDI has a corporate requirement of 95 stalls which leaves open 230 stalls in Lot 2.Those may be utilized by Burlington and the future tenant of the open space adjacent.The provided parking stalls in the lot are all within close proximity to the entrances of the retailers and thus the allotted parking is of good quality because it provides ease of access. Further, it should be noted how retail business and consumers have changed their operational and consumer habits in a post- covid world have not yet been reflected in city codes. Due to the rise of E-commerce and online shopping/delivery options, not as many people drive to stores to do their shopping in person. Retailers have adapted to these post-covid changes, including ALDI,who has implemented a curbside pick-up option along the southern side of their store, as many others, which reduces the amount of customers requiring parking spaces while shopping in the store. Not as many parking stalls are required for pickup and delivery options and this changing trend has not yet been reflected in city code. In accordance with the following findings, Apple Valley Minnesota Realty, LLC requests a variance to allow for a reduction in parking requirements. 155.397 (b) In considering a request for a variance and whether the applicant established that there are practical difficulties in complying with provision(s)of this chapter,the Board and City Council shall consider the following factors: (i)Special conditions apply to the structures or land in question that are particular to the property and do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district or vicinity in which the land is located. Based upon the findings of the parking study,the current parking lot has provided enough stalls for the parking area required by the customers of Aldi and Burlington.As the parking lot is over capacity,this means that valuable land that holds potential for additional uses is not being used and is currently serving as an empty space at points. The current over-sized parking lot is an inefficient use of land for the community, and adding a retail tenant allows for a stronger streetscape presence along Cedar Avenue.. (ii) The granting of the proposed variance will not be contrary to the intent of this chapter. The granting of the variance to accommodate the loss of parking stalls in order to construct a new Popeyes is not contrary to the intent of code Chapter 155: Zoning. The purpose and intent of zoning is to regulate land use and development to protect the health,safety and welfare of the community. There will be no negative impacts to neighboring properties from granting a parking reduction variance. As demonstrated,there will be more than adequate parking to accommodate uses of higher intensity in a more robust retail environment without causing parking to overflow onto adjacent lots. (iii) The special conditions or circumstances do not result from the actions of the owner/applicant. The special conditions do not result from the actions of the owner as the number of stalls requested by tenants is met in the new proposed parking layout and will not affect current customers. (iv) The granting of the variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but is necessary to alleviate practical difficulties in complying with the zoning provisions of this Code. Page 3 of 4 952.426.0699+ISGInc.com ISG As the outlot where the Popeyes has been proposed to be constructed is located in the section of the Apple Valley Square parking lot serving the businesses ALDI and Burlington,the total number of stalls in the parking area must be decrease in order to allow construction of the new building. Bringing down the number of stalls is not a convenience but necessary to allow the construction and commercial operation of Popeyes. (v) The variance requested is the minimum variance necessary to alleviate the practical difficulty. The minimum number of stalls as feasible will be removed in the construction of the Popeyes. Popeyes is proposed to be approximately 2,300 sq.ft. in the NE section of the lot. Only the minimum number of stalls required will be removed. Further, the remaining number of stalls is more than sufficient to meet the demands of retailer's and exceed the counts observed in the parking study. Please contact me at 952.426.0699 with any questions or if there is any additional information we can provide in support of this project Sincerely, J ,01/1A 4 Claire Roth la Project Coordinator Claire.Roth@ISGlnc.com Page 4 of 4 952.426.0699+ISGInc.com City of Apple.. Valley MEMO Public Works Department TO: Alex Sharpe, Planner FROM: Brandon Anderson, City Engineer DATE: November 29, 2022 SUBJECT: Apple Valley Square 7th Addition— Popeyes The following are comments on the Apple Valley Square 7th Addition — Popeyes site plan Revised November 29, 2022. Please include these comments as conditions to approval. General 1. Provide a narrative and site plan showing how the expansion will be constructed and any impacts prior to building permit authorization. The narrative and plan shall include the following: a. Material storage and staging i. All material storage to be onsite and indicated on plan. b. Haul routes to and from the site. c. Contractor and subcontractor parking locations i. Onsite trade parking should be provided. 2. Provide a copy of the executed Minnesota Department of Health, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Met Council, Department of Labor and any other required permits prior to Building permit authorization. 3. A Natural Resource Management Permit (NRMP) will be required prior to any land disturbing activity commences. 4. Underground Infiltration Basin Construction and Maintenance Agreement will be required as part of Development Agreement and be privately owned and maintained and recorded with the property. 5. Provide a copy of the approval letter from the Department of Labor and Industry (DOLT) prior to construction. Site 6. 10' rear and front yard drainage and utility easements should be indicated on the Final Plat for lots 1 & 2. 7. Provide the document number for the existing utility easement over the sanitary sewer south of the existing building. 8. Provide a lighting and photometric plan if any lighting modifications are to be made. 9. Additional signage plan is required to address internal traffic circulation to/from the drive thru lanes. Signs such as one way or do not enter should be provided near the exit lane north of the building. 10. Final site plan shall be reviewed with the construction plans and approved by City Engineer. Traffic See attached response memo for the review of the Popeye's Traffic Study completed by KLOA, Inc on September 15, 2022 and UPDATED on October 24, 2022. 1. As indicated, there is room for 16 vehicles in the drive thru. Based on research in the Twin Cities, max drive thru queues for fast food typically reach 13 vehicles, indicating that this drive thru would be expected to accommodate expected queues. As noted, there is some reserve capacity, if necessary. 2. Based on operations, additional mitigation is not anticipated. Storm Drainage, Grading and Erosion Control 11. Show elevations at all critical elevation points (i.e. high and low points). 12. Show all emergency over flow (EOF) elevations. The finished floor/low opening elevation must be 1' minimum above the EOF elevation. 13. Provide soil borings at proposed underground basin prior to building permit approval. 14. Additional ESC devices may be necessary outside project limits to address material haul out and staging areas. 15. Provide the overall site composite Curve Number (CN) along with the impervious % on the grading plan. 16. No proposed contours or spot elevations for the parking lot modifications of Lot 2 Block 1 of Apple Valley Square 4th Addition are shown. A grading plan is required. 17. Final grading, drainage, and erosion control plan shall be reviewed with the construction plans and approved by City Engineer. Utilities 18. Final locations and sizes of Sanitary Sewer and Water main shall be reviewed with the final construction plans and approved by City Engineer. 19. Final locations and sizes of Storm Sewer shall be reviewed with the final construction plans and approved by City Engineer. a. Provide storm sewer calculations for storm water requirements. (Rational method including Hydraulic grade lines). 20. The existing storm sewer should be televised and reports provided to City for review. Acceptance of existing pipe as public infrastructure is dependent on condition findings. 21. Any existing sanitary sewer and water service not being used should be identified on the plans and shown as either removed or abandoned in place. Any existing sanitary wye's shall be capped as part of the removal/abandonment. 22. The existing water main that is shown as being connected to is privately owned. Agreements for connection to water main must be submitted to and approved by City Attorney as part of development agreement. 23. The existing sanitary sewer that is shown as being connected to is privately owned and maintained. a. The existing sanitary sewer must be televised with reports being provided to City of Apple Valley for review. Acceptance of utilizing existing pipe is dependent on condition findings. b. For utilization of the existing private sanitary sewer the following conditions must be met: i. Verify that the existing waste system are sized for the added fixtures. Flow calculations (fixture units) are required to be submitted for the existing line and must meet Current Plumbing Code standards. This line must meet current standards from the receiving MH (at forcemain outlet) to where it connects to public infrastructure (Pennock Avenue). 24. Existing Sanitary MH receiving recommended FM discharge should be lined with a hydrogen sulfide and corrosion resistant liner such as Quadex, Strong Seal, Sewer Seal or approved equal. 25. Agreements for connection to sanitary sewer must be submitted to and approved by City Attorney as part of development agreement. Natural Resources 26. Applicant will be required to document that the underground retention system is functioning as designed and drawing down within 48-hours after installation prior to NRMP closeout. 27. All public existing trees along Cedar Avenue shall remain protected throughout construction as indicated. Any tree lost due to construction damage shall be replaced on a one to one ratio. Traffic 1. Counts were collected during the midday and p.m. peak hours, which is consistent with the proposed land use. Noted. 2. Directional distribution is not show. As indicated, it is from current travel patterns, which is consistent with typical methodology, however, specific percentages are not shown on a graphic and should be provided. A figure showing the directional distribution has been included in the revised traffic study. 3. The trip generation in the tables does NOT match the ITE rates for a 2,519 SF FF with Drive Thru. The attached ITE rate sheets are correct, however, the estimates do not correlate. They are approximately 5 to 10% lower than what ITE generates. Possible a different square footage was used. The following trip generation is correct compared to what was shown. Note, this difference will likely not cause a change in operations, however, the trip generation should be updated to reflect the current site plan. The trip generation has been updated to reflect the updated size of the proposed building. 4. Pass-by percentage reductions accurate. Noted. 5. The Year 2025 Total Projected Traffic Volumes graphic is titled Year 2028, not 2025. The figure has been revised. 6. In the Year 2025 Total Projected Traffic Volumes graphic, the pass-by trips are not included in the volumes. Only half of the trips are shown entering/exiting the site and no reductions are shown on the main lines of Cedar Ave or 153rd Street. While the pass-by reduction is noted at 50%, that does not apply to trips entering/exiting the site. Therefore, the full trip generation of the site is not shown. The total projected traffic volume figure and traffic analysis has been revised. 7. The traffic analysis results appear correctly done, however, with only half of the trip generation, these need to be updated to identify the true impacts. The traffic analysis has been revised. 8. In the Discussion and Recommendations section, the build year is referred to as year 2028, not year 2025. The traffic study has been revised. 9. The eastbound approach of the Cedar Avenue and North Access Drive indicates an increase of 16 seconds during the p.m. peak hour, however, without the true trip generation, this delay may increase with the updated analysis. a. This eastbound approach should discuss if/how long it will block internal access in the parking lot. The traffic study has been updated to provide a discussion of queues at this intersection. 10. As indicated, there is room for 16 vehicles in the drive thru. Based on research in the Twin Cities, max drive thru queues for fast food typically reach 13 vehicles, indicating that this drive thru would be expected to accommodate expected queues.As noted,there is some reserve capacity,if necessary. Noted. 11. The AM or PM peak hour generator trip generation rate sheet should be included to indicate which is used for the Midday peak hour.Note,the SRF estimate above is for the PM peak hour generator, which is expected to occur during the lunch hour. The correct ITE Trip generations sheets have been added to the appendix of the traffic study. 12. The operations analysis appears to be completed correctly with geometrics/traffic controls, however,it needs to be updated to reflect the trip generation estimates with the pass by trips. The traffic analysis has been revised. 13. Based on operations, additional mitigation is not anticipated, even with the additional trips added it should operate at acceptable levels. Noted. irLOXI‘ Ken ig'Lindgren,0'Hara,Aboo na,I nc. 9575 West Higgins Road,Suite 400 1 Rosemont,Illinois 60018 p:847-518-9990 1 f: 847-518-9987 MEMORANDUM TO: Tim Reber, P.E. Woolpert. Inc. FROM: Shahrzad Ainkeshavarzi Consultant Luay R. Aboona, PE, PTOE Principal DATE: October 24, 2022 SUBJECT: Traffic Evaluation Proposed Popeyes Restaurant Apple Valley,Minnesota This report summarizes the methodologies, results, and findings of a traffic impact study conducted by Kenig,Lindgren,O'Hara,Aboona,Inc. (KLOA, Inc.)for a proposed Popeyes drive- through restaurant to be located in Apple Valley, Minnesota. The site, which currently is part of the parking lot of the Apple Valley Square, is located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Cedar Avenue with 153rd Street. As proposed, the plans call for an approximately 2,519 square foot drive-through Popeyes restaurant with dual (side-by-side) drive-through ordering boards and 18 parking spaces.Access to the proposed restaurant will be provided via the existing access drives which serve the shopping center including a full movement access drive off 153rd Street and a right-in/right-out access off Cedar Avenue. The internal access to the restaurant will be provided via the existing driving aisles within the shopping center. A copy of the site plan depicting the proposed restaurant is included in the Appendix. The purpose of this study was to examine background traffic conditions, assess the impact that the proposed restaurant will have on traffic conditions in the area, and determine if any roadway or access improvements are necessary to accommodate traffic generated by the proposed restaurant. Figure 1 shows an aerial view of the site. Existing Roadway System Characteristics The characteristics of the existing roadways near the development are described below and illustrated in Figure 2. Cedar Avenue is a north-south principal arterial roadway that in the vicinity of the site provides three lanes in each direction. At its signalized intersection with 153rd Street, Cedar Avenue provides an exclusive left-turn lane, three through lanes and an exclusive right-turn lane on both approaches. High visibility crosswalks and pedestrian count signals are present on both approaches. At its right-in/right-out intersection with the North Access Drive to the Apple Valley Square, Cedar Avenue provides three through lanes and an exclusive right-turn lane on the KLOA,Inc.Transportation any.Parking Planning Consultants southbound approach. Cedar Avenue has a posted speed limit of 45 miles per hour, is under the jurisdiction of the Dakota County, and carries an Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) volume of 41,000 vehicles (MnDOT 2019). 153rd Street is an east-west minor collector roadway that in the vicinity of the site provides two through lanes in each direction. At its signalized intersection with Cedar Avenue, 153rd Street provides an exclusive left-turn lane,an exclusive through lane and a shared through/right-turn lane on the eastbound approach and an exclusive left-turn lane, two through lanes and an exclusive right-turn lane on the westbound approach. High visibility cross walks and pedestrian countdown signals are present on both approaches. At its unsignalized intersection with the ALDI Access Drive, 153rd Street provides a through lane and a shared through/right-turn lane on the eastbound approach and a through lane and an exclusive right-turn lane on the westbound approach. 153rd Street has a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour, is under the jurisdiction of the City of Apple Valley, and carries an AADT volume of 11,400 vehicles (MnDOT 2019) east of Cedar Avenue and an AADT volume of 7,500 vehicles (MnDOT 2019) west of Cedar Avenue. 2 • l N'+n., « rt - J i�. t _ s ' Lope �� Mee Ave C�]Q7o_ I- ._ tE rail 1i - ElQ3 li .- �� - i1 - 970 _ •- "i'' =', i t �--. 1',,:� rr� r...,a��,,,,��,,�� .- @mnk�n _ • Fkripca1' -0..; riri 47ill , / d . -•I tr - rer�"th ..I..r• - Js r r r• asearriK.S - I ., r,• ' l � :Ji� 1 _ - ■ ri , . - I=t�',cit.7t'4. •' r , nl ®ne(f p fie]w ", •14A. f.•yam^ R1, - ¢ Try , ..•: - f� 9 •Pr + goP 'r.Brean ti41t «_, •,•.ra1. 9%,K sr®ee F• - SITE in, w: r 'ti o o C•entrf1 `S. 4' Bur n on 8 . �-i ' w[ •� ®��ccr� I,r. la sio:e i ; r r. 11�n7?, I I • •Fjr¢Sid¢ r.. ''4. r .,R r ��-yJ Bes t?o o I - Welgr•ens '.• . . v Electreacs store - t •'Arby5 • • Drug ore.�T11. .153rd,StW• • ....153rd:SiiW .ih�.i �Q _ _ e «... • _ _ '®ffiee Sep®3 : . le A-A • •.Fasttl:$.17 Y . •;0.§,;Foo Li .•,.--. 7.: i ., ,.,, — — -EgiarTaro 2 ilINFice4Fol'e.... .. 44%40 Aerial View of Site Figure 1 3 LEGEND -TRAVEL LANE Ce ILI TRAFFIC SIGNAL CASTLEIC w w NOT TO SCALE s -STOP SIGN ® 45 v a XX -SPEED LIMIT .Jl 11 COLD ® -NO PARKING NORTH STONE -STANDARD CROSSWALK ACCESS DRIVE t t t t 45 APPLE VALLEY SQUARE SHOPPING MALL I PANERA SITE w > 12 BURLINGTON F ON yw C) ALDI ARBY'S WALGREENS . .�. .s J 111�. — 153RD T ~ 30 r STREET *** I I I 1 RESIDENTIAL CHICK-FIL-A Pop eyes ��, Apple Valley, Existing Roadway Characteristics KeAtl`Ooa, . Minnesota Job No:22-285 Figure: 2 Existing Traffic Volumes To determine current traffic conditions within the study area, KLOA, Inc. conducted peak period traffic,pedestrian, and bicycle counts at the following intersections: • Cedar Avenue with the Northerly Access Drive of the Apple Valley Square • 153rd Street with ALDI Access Drive The counts were conducted on Wednesday, August 24, 2022 during the midday (11:30 A.M. to 1:30 P.M.) and evening (4:00 P.M. to 6:00 P.M.)peak periods. The results of the traffic counts indicated that the peak hours of traffic generally occur between 12:30 P.M. and 1:30 P.M. during the weekday midday peak period and between 4:15 P.M. and 5:15 P.M. during the weekday evening peak period. Copies of the traffic count summary sheets are included in the Appendix. Figure 3 illustrates the Year 2022 existing peak hour traffic volumes. Directional Distribution The directions from which traffic will approach and depart the proposed development were estimated based on existing travel patterns of vehicles utilizing the access drives, as determined from the traffic counts. Figure 4 illustrates the estimated directional distribution. Trip Generation Estimates The number of peak hour trips estimated to be generated by the proposed restaurant was based on vehicle trip generation rates contained in Trip Generation Manual, 1 1th Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). The "Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Through Window" (Land-Use Code 934) rate was utilized for the proposed restaurant. Copies of the ITE trip generation summary sheets are included in the Appendix. It is important to note that surveys conducted by ITE have shown that a considerable number of trips made to restaurants are diverted from the existing traffic on the roadway system. Such diverted trips are referred to as pass-by traffic. Based on information published in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, approximately 50 percent of trips generated by fast-food restaurants with drive-throughs are pass-by trips. As such, the trips anticipated to be generated by the proposed Popeyes were reduced by 50 percent. Table 5 summarizes the estimated peak hour trips. 5 LEGEND 00 -WEEKDAY AFTERNOON PEAK HOUR(12:30-1:30 PM) N c 49, 44 (00) -WEEKDAY EVENING PEAK HOUR(4:15-5:15 PM) N w NOT TO SCALE w �� "a in WI NORTH 4J 1 ACCESS DRIVE 95 (95) - T Q 0 ti SITE • W ON yW C) a lj 1* L 166 (167) 153RD = 213 (233) 114 STREET 29 (35) - 223 (262) —* Popeyes KLO)1- Apple Valley, Existing Traffic Volumes Kenig,Lintlgren,0'Hara,Aboona,lnc. Minnesota Job No:22-285 Figure: 3 LEGEND 00% -PERCENT DISTRIBUTION a I W NOT TO SCALE C)> a NORTH ACCESS DRIVE 1 SITE • W _ ce m� ON yW C) a lox 153RD STREET 10% 0 Popeyes ICLO)th Apple Valley, Directional Distribution Kenig,Lintl gren,0'Hara,Aboona,lnc. Minnesota Job No:22-285 Figure: 4 Table 1 PEAK HOUR SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES ITE Weekday Midday Weekday Evening Land-Use Type Peak Hour Peak Hour Weekday Daily Code In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total Fast Food Restaurant 934 with Drive-Through 65 63 128 43 40 83 589 589 1,178 Window (2,519 s.f.) 50%Pass-By Trips -32 -32 -64 -21 -21 -42 -295 -295 -590 Total New Trips 33 31 64 20 19 39 294 294 588 8 Restaurant Traffic Assignment The estimated weekday midday and weekday evening peak hour traffic volumes that will be generated by the proposed restaurant were assigned to the roadway system in accordance with the previously described directional distribution. The new traffic assignment for the restaurant is illustrated in Figure 5. The pass-by traffic assignment for the restaurant is illustrated in Figure 6. Total Projected Traffic Volumes Based on the growth rate published on the World Population Review Website, the population of Apple Valley is increasing by 1.28 percent per year, therefore an increase of approximately 1.28 percent per year for three years (buildout year plus two years) was applied to the existing conditions. The restaurant-generated traffic was added to the existing traffic volumes accounting for background growth to determine the Year 2025 total projected traffic volumes, as shown in Figure 7. Traffic Analyses Roadway intersection analyses were performed for the weekday midday and weekday evening peak hours for the existing (Year 2022) and future projected(Year 2025)traffic volumes. The traffic analyses were performed using the methodologies outlined in the Transportation Research Board's Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), 6th Edition and analyzed using Synchro/SimTraffic computer software. The analysis for an unsignalized intersection determines the average control delay to vehicles at an intersection. Control delay is the elapsed time from a vehicle joining the queue at a stop sign (includes the time required to decelerate to a stop) until its departure from the stop sign and resumption of free flow speed. The methodology analyzes each intersection approach controlled by a stop sign and considers traffic volumes on all approaches and lane characteristics. Summaries of the traffic analysis results showing the level of service and overall intersection delay (measured in seconds) for the existing and Year 2025 total projected conditions are presented in Tables 2 and 3.A discussion of the intersection follows. Summary sheets for the capacity analyses are included in the Appendix. 9 LEGEND 00 -WA AO P a (00) WEEKDAYEEKDY EVENINGFTERNO OP EN K HOUREAKHOUR(415-5:15(12:30-1:30 PM) PM) w NOT TO SCALE C)> Q NORTH ACCESS DRIVE 12 (7) 00 • SITE • W > _ � �co) ON yW C) a < 4 L. 153RD T i 16 (10) STREET 3 (2) - Popeyes Apple Valley, Site-Generated Traffic Volumes Kenig,Lintl gren,0'Hara,Aboona,In c. Minnesota Job No:22-285 Figure: 5 LEGEND 00 -WEEKDAY AFTERNOON PEAK HOUR(12:30-1:30 PM) .. LLI (00) -WEEKDAY EVENING PEAK HOUR(4:15-5:15 PM) - w w NOT TO SCALE M0a NORTH 4J 1 ACCESS DRIVE N +13 (+11) -, SITE • w > _ � �co) ON yw —m () + + + I Y y L +17 (+9) 153RD T 1- -2 (-1) /14 STREET +2 (+1) 2' -2 (-1) -+ Popeyes KLOAh Apple Valley, Pass-By Traffic Volumes Kenig,Lintl gren,0'Hara,Aboona,In c. Minnesota Job No:22-285 Figure: 6 LEGEND 00 -WEEKDAY AFTERNOON PEAK HOUR(12:30-1:30 PM) al (00) -WEEKDAY EVENING PEAK HOUR(4:15-5:15 PM) N W w NOT TO SCALE onorn UQ NORTH * 1 ACCESS DRIVE 124 (117) l• 172. N I • . I SITE • I • W > _ � mu) ON yW c V L, L 206 (193) 153RD T ~ 220 (241) 114 STREET 35 (39) 2' 230 (271) -* Popeyes ��, Apple Valley, Year 2025 Total Projected Traffic Volumes Ke�Atl`Ooa,�. Minnesota Job No:22-285 Figure: 7 Table 2 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS—EXISTING CONDITIONS Weekday Midday Weekday Evening Intersection Peak Hour Peak Hour LOS Delay LOS Delay Cedar Avenue with North Access Drive • Eastbound Approach C 20.0 F 72.1 153rd Street with ALDI Access Drive • Southbound Approach C 16.7 C 19.1 • Eastbound Left Turn A 8.2 A 8.3 LOS=Level of Service Delay is measured in seconds. Table 3 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS —TOTAL PROJECTED CONDITIONS Weekday Midday Weekday Evening Intersection Peak Hour Peak Hour LOS Delay LOS Delay Cedar Avenue with North Access Drive • Eastbound Approach C 22.9 F 116.4 153rd Street with ALDI Access Drive • Southbound Approach C 21.1 C 23.4 • Eastbound Left Turn A 8.4 A 8.4 LOS=Level of Service Delay is measured in seconds. 13 Discussion and Recommendations The following summarizes how the intersections are projected to operate and identifies any roadway and traffic control improvements necessary to accommodate the development-generated traffic. Cedar Avenue with North Access Drive The results of the capacity analysis indicate that currently the eastbound approach operates at LOS C during the weekday midday peak hour and LOS F during the weekday evening peak hour with a v/c ratio of less than one. Under Year 2025 total projected conditions, the eastbound approach will continue to operate at LOS C during the midday peak hour and will operate at LOS F during the weekday evening peak hour. Importantly, the eastbound approach is projected to continue to operate with a v/c ration of less than one and 95th percentile queues of approximatly six vehicles or less. While eastbound queues from this intersection may block the closest internal access drive,a review of the Simtraffic simulation of the roadway network indicated that the internal access drive will be blocked less than 10 percent of the time during the midday peak hour and less than 40 percent of the time during the weekday evening peak hour. Further, when the access drive is blocked vehicles will be able to circulate within the parking lot and turn at the next internal access drive located further west. Eastbound queues are not projected to extend to the next internal access drive to the west during either peak hour. Lastly, given the median on the access drive, vehicles are not able to turn left onto the first internal access drive, and, as a result, inbound movements will not be impacted by queues at this intersection. As such, the traffic that will be generated by the proposed restaurant will have a limited impact on the operation of this intersection. 153rd Street with ALDI Access Drive The results of the capacity analysis indicate that currently the southbound left-turn movements operate at LOS C during both peak hours and the eastbound left-turn movements operate at LOS A during both peak hours. Under Year 2025 total projected conditions, the southbound left-turn movements will continue operating at LOS C during both peak hours with increases in delay of less than five seconds. The eastbound left-turn movements are projected to continue operating at LOS A during both peak hours with increases in delay of less than one second. As such, this intersection has the reserve capacity accommodating the traffic that will be generated by the proposed development efficiently. Restaurant Operations and Circulation The restaurant building will be located south of the site with the parking lot providing 14 parallel parking spaces located on the east border and five angled parking spaces located on the north border of the site. The site will be designed with one-way counterclockwise circulation which will be reinforced via signage,pavement marking, and angled parking. 14 Restaurant Drive-Through Stacking According to the site plan, the proposed drive-through operations will occur on the north, west, and south sides of the building with the entrance to the drive-through located on the north side of the building with the pay and pick-up windows located on the south side of the building. There will be stacking for a total of approximately 16 vehicles to queue within the drive-through with five vehicles to queue after the dual ordering boards and eleven vehicles able to queue before the dual ordering boards. It should be noted that additional stacking can occur along the north side of the building without impeding the on-site circulation. As mentioned before,the proposed drive- through will provide stacking for a total of approximately 16 vehicles which exceeds the City of Apple Valley Codes of Ordinances requirements of six stacking spaces for each drive through window. In the unlikely event that queues at the drive-through facility are longer, the additional vehicles can queue internally within the site without impacting traffic operations on the Shopping Center driving aisles. Parking Evaluation As proposed,the restaurant will provide a total of 18 parking spaces,resulting in a parking supply of 7.15 spaces per 1,000 square feet. Based on the City of Apple Valley Code of Ordinances, fast- food restaurants are required to provide parking at a ratio of one space per three customer seats. As such,the proposed Popeyes is required to provide 8 parking spaces,resulting in a surplus of 10 parking spaces. Conclusion Based on the preceding evaluation, the following conclusions and recommendations have been made: • The new traffic projected to be generated by the proposed restaurant will be reduced due to the volume of pass-by traffic generated by fast-food restaurants and internal capture. • The results of the capacity analysis indicated that the existing access drives will have sufficient reserve capacity to accommodate the traffic that will be generated by the proposed restaurant and no roadway or traffic control improvements are required. • The proposed drive-through stacking of 16 vehicles will be adequate in accommodating the peak drive-through demand based on City of Apple Valley Code of Ordinances. • The proposed 18 parking spaces will be adequate in accommodating the peak parking demand based on City of Apple Valley Code of Ordinances. 15 Appendix Traffic Count Summary Sheets Site Plan ITE Trip Generation Summary Sheets Level of Service Criteria Capacity Analysis Summary Sheets Traffic Count Summary Sheets Type of peak hour being reported:Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Cedar Ave-- Northeast Apple Valley Square Dwy QC JOB#: 15919503 CITY/STATE: Apple Valley, MN DATE:Wed,Aug 24 2022 1509 1470L Peak-Hour: 12:15 PM--1:15 PM 5.2 5 • t Peak 15 Min: 12:30 PM 12:45 PM I + t 156 1353 0 1.3 5.6 0 ., + 4 ., + y 156 4 0 ,t t 0 « 0 1s « 0 .t - t 0 « 0 0 + 098 « 0 0 . �\ + 0 95 + 95 i C 0 + 0 0 + 0 i C 0 + 0 7 .., ,.. 7 7 ., , r. 7 a 1470 * + 5 *0 1448 1470 Quality Counts 5.2 5 DATA 111.47 EWES COhihi)NTT?E5 _1 0 L l 0 1 0 L. l L 1 1 1 STOP 0 1 t 0i A i 4 0 * ; • 0 0 i C 0 * eo 7 0 p 0 1 0 I ., N/A i' I I ., N/A+ 6 4. a s- 4. .t t N/A+ • + N/A r r + + N/A�+ /_ \, 4 N/A STOP r. p i M r C * i / C 7 ...+ N/A * 7 ^ N/A r 15-Min Count Cedar Ave Cedar Ave Northeast Apple Valley Square Northeast Apple Valley Square Period (Northbound) (Southbound) Hwy Hwy Total Hourly Beginning At (Eastbound) (Westbound) Totals Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 11:30 AM 0 330 0 0 0 239 30 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 616 11:45 AM 0 366 0 0 0 301 39 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 729 12:00 PM 0 370 0 0 0 316 41 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 745 12:15 PM 0 387 0 0 0 340 39 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 782 2872 12:30 PM 0 394 0 0 0 323 46 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 787 3043 12:45 PM 0 345 0 0 0 338 37 0 0 0 27 0 0 0 0 0 747 3061 1:00 PM 0 344 0 0 0 352 34 0 0 0 28 0 0 0 0 0 758 3074 1:15 PM 0 345 0 0 0 353 43 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 759 3051 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 0 1576 0 0 0 1292 184 0 0 0 96 0 0 0 0 0 3148 Heavy Trucks 0 92 0 0 84 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 176 Buses Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Scooters Comments: - Report generated on 9/6/2022 7:32 AM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.net)1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Type of peak hour being reported:Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Cedar Ave-- Northeast Apple Valley Square Dwy QC JOB#: 15919504 CITY/STATE: Apple Valley, MN DATE:Wed,Aug 24 2022 2477 1543L Peak-Hour:4:15 PM--5:15 PM 2.8 2.8 • * Peak 15-Min:4:30 PM--4:45 PM I a t 154 2323 0 0., 2.9 0 a a 1544 0 ,t t o . 0 0.64 0 . - \ t 0 . 0 0 . o9,1 . 0 0 . . 0 95 . 95 1 C 0 . 0 0 . 0 i C 0 + 0 7 .., ,.. 7 7 ., , r 7 a 7543 00 0I i} • Counts a 8 * 2418 1543 Quality L u n}s 2.8 2.8 DATA 111.47 EN4E5 COMMUNTf E5 _1 0 L to o 11 ,i a 6. L 1 1 1 STOP t 0 21 A jo 0 . (d7 .. . 0 0 , r 0 7 o p -1000 \ I N/A t I I N/A . . ..t t N/A+ • t. N/A 4. r r r r N/A+ _ \, 4 N/A STOP r. p 7 s N r r • s / r 7 ... N/A ^ N/A a * r 15-Min Count Cedar Ave Cedar Ave Northeast Apple Valley Square Northeast Apple Valley Square Period (Northbound) (Southbound) Hwy Hwy Total Hourly Beginning At (Eastbound) (Westbound) Totals Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 4:00 PM 0 341 0 0 0 587 36 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 994 4:15 PM 0 397 0 0 0 557 33 0 0 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 1013 4:30 PM 0 425 0 0 0 606 41 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 1093 4:45 PM 0 391 0 0 0 534 26 0 0 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 977 4077 5:00 PM 0 330 0 0 0 626 54 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 1032 4115 5:15 PM 0 393 0 0 0 483 50 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 947 4049 5:30 PM 0 406 0 0 0 509 49 0 0 0 28 0 0 0 0 0 992 3948 5:45 PM 0 391 0 0 0 473 36 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 924 3895 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 0 1700 0 0 0 2424 164 0 0 0 84 0 0 0 0 0 4372 Heavy Trucks 0 52 0 0 72 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 124 Buses Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Scooters Comments: Report generated on 9/6/2022 7:32 AM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.net)1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Type of peak hour being reported:Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LOCATION: South Apple Valley Square Dwy-- 153rd St W QC JOB#: 15919501 CITY/STATE: Apple Valley, MN DATE:Wed,Aug 24 2022 204 195 Peak-Hour: 12:30 PM--1:30 PM 2 1 I• * Peak 15 Min: 1:00 PM 1:15 PM + 47 0 157L 0 0 2s ✓ + 4. ✓ + r 260 4 29 > t 166 . 379 1.5 4- 0 . t 1.2 . 1.6 223 + 092 . 213 2.2 + �\ 4. 1.9 252 r 0 1 r 0 + 380 2 + 0 '1 r 0 + 2.4 7.., ,. p —1 , . r. 7 0 0 0 0 . . . . 4. . 0 0 Quality Counts o 0 IDATA 111.47EWES MrirriCINTVES 0�► I L 1 0 2• I i 0 of A jo o . ] « 1 0z r o 7 o p � OoO7 I N/A I I .1 +A �. .a .- 6- 4. -1 ' 4)10, A. N/A+ 4N/A N/A+ , 4 N/A r r r STOP1 / r 7 - N/A 7 R N/A r + * 15-Min Count South Apple Valley Square Dwy South Apple Valley Square Dwy 153rd St W 153rd St W Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) Total Hourly Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Totals 11:30 AM 0 0 0 0 28 0 11 0 10 53 0 0 0 32 27 1 162 11:45 AM 0 0 0 0 41 0 11 0 7 50 0 0 0 52 41 0 202 12:00 PM 0 0 0 0 45 0 6 0 10 60 0 0 0 68 43 0 232 12:15 PM 0 0 0 0 41 0 12 0 11 46 0 0 0 40 44 1 195 791 12:30 PM 0 0 0 0 38 0 8 0 8 54 0 0 0 46 42 0 196 825 12:45 PM 0 0 0 0 44 0 10 0 10 51 0 0 0 57 38 0 210 833 1:00 PM 0 0 0 0 35 0 15 0 8 71 0 0 0 53 44 0 226 827 1:15 PM 0 0 0 0 40 0 14 0 3 47 0 0 0 57 42 0 203 835 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 0 0 0 0 140 0 60 0 32 284 0 0 0 212 176 0 904 Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 12 Buses Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 Scooters Comments: Report generated on 9/6/2022 7:32 AM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.net)1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Type of peak hour being reported:Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LOCATION: South Apple Valley Square Dwy-- 153rd St W QC JOB#: 15919502 CITY/STATE: Apple Valley, MN DATE:Wed,Aug 24 2022 225 206 Peak-Hour:4:45 PM--5:45 PM 0.9 0.5 I• * Peak 15 Min:5:30 PM 5:45 PM + t 57 0 168L 0 0 1.z ✓ + 4 ✓ + �. 296 r- 37 ! t 169 4 409 1 r- 0 ! t 0.6 �- 1 275 + 094 4 239 2.2 + A\. . 1.3 312 r 0 1 r 1 r 444 1.9•+ 0 7 r 0 + 1B 7.., ,. p 7 .., . r 7 O 0 0 . . , . , . , O 0 Quality Counts 0 0 IDATA 111.47 EWES COhirallY flES _1 1 L to 0 1I YY Lr + STOP of A jo 0 .• .�C'�j\. o O i r 0 7 o I p -4 it r. 7 0 0 0 I ., N/A i' I I .r. N+A i' 4. ! t 4. —1 ! t N/A+ • 4* N/A N/A w /\, 4 N/A r 1 M r r r STOP i \/ r 7 - N/A 7 ^ N/A r • * 15-Min Count South Apple Valley Square Dwy South Apple Valley Square Dwy 153rd St W 153rd St W Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) Total Hourly Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Totals 4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 30 0 10 0 13 59 0 0 0 56 30 0 198 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 40 0 14 0 11 63 0 0 0 58 53 0 239 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 38 0 10 0 7 58 0 0 0 63 44 0 220 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 43 0 14 0 7 79 0 0 0 70 38 0 251 908 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 47 0 19 0 10 62 0 0 0 42 32 0 212 922 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 32 0 8 0 7 68 0 0 0 63 52 1 231 914 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 46 0 16 0 13 66 0 0 0 64 47 0 252 946 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 51 0 19 0 6 61 0 0 0 53 50 0 240 935 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 0 0 0 0 184 0 64 0 52 264 0 0 0 256 188 0 1008 Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 8 Buses Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Scooters Comments: Report generated on 9/6/2022 7:32 AM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.net)1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Site Plan SITE LEGEND N V v j 11INDICATES LIGHT DUTY I PAVEMENT COMPOSITION PAVEMENT-SEE DETAILS FOR 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 / II INDICATES HEAVY DUTY PAVEMENT-SEE DETAILS FOR PAVEMENT COMPOSITION 1 1 11 INDICATES NEW CONCRETE PAVEMENT/SIDEWALK-SEE DETAILS FOR PAVEMENT COMPOSITION w 11 1 A A �� // I ❑e •0 LIGHT POLES 1 1 EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER 1 POSITIVE SLOPED CURB L 1 1 - - - - - NEGATIVE SLOPED CURB io INDICATES ROW PARKING COUNT V j � \\ 1 — — PROPERTY BOUNDARY z cn V cn 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 - z N w 1 1 11 I m 11 1 11 SITE DATA w -H -H I- 1- H H I- -1 -1 -1 -h _/ 11 1 III PROPOSED SITE AREA 0.63 ACRES o II II ZONING RB RETAIL BUSINESS II II cL A / I // 1 BUILDING DATA: a_/ V//I �� i� I 2 519 SQ. FT. ww — I I BUILDING AREAw 1 IIII PARKING DATA: w II SPACES REQUIRED 8 (1 SPACE/3 SEATS) W N SPACES PROVIDED 18 I POPEYES — —1111 ACCESSIBLE SPACES REQUIRED 1 0 rn MONUMENT SIGN 1I 1I ACCESSIBLE SPACES PROVIDED 2 a V/ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 \\ III I N 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 III II cN rn Z- L _� - I� : ' 'r >_ � - 11= t - -- _ � � _ � _ _L _ 1 - � - - ---a \ - - I III II N 1 N N �/ III ,� I- 4 t in C / 11 I II SITE NOTES W o o k III -) W o ,6 // 1 ° 13 II II 1. ALL DIMENSIONS, RADII AND COORDINATES ARE TO BACK OF CURB WHERE °a. Q W i Y ° ° a ° , I II APPLICABLE. ALL RADII SHALL BE 4' UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE. a D D C1 U • N N O - 0 1~20 N ° °df a 0 5 t 1 I 11 2. ALL PAVEMENT MARKING SHALL BE YELLOW IN COLOR UNLESS INDICATED a °o o I\ •° , i te4 — I OTHERWISE. <0. 1 II 4 „44. 1i o ° . 4 ° I 1 3. ALL CURB & GUTTER SHALL BE B6.12, "POSITIVE", UNLESS NOTED c m '° '' : < < ° OTHERWISE (SEE DETAILS). Ct° — I 1 I I 4. ADA DETECTABLE WARNINGS/TRUNCATED DOMES TO BE PROVIDED AT s- �nfi ? ° 4 d .�_ ro co 1 1 SIDEWALKS ON EITHER SIDE OF EACH DRIVEWAY CROSSING. > as M c\Ir, _ ^1 11 III 5. SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR BUILDING DIMENSIONS. t I- CO O) co 0 I I Ø- 4� ° a ° ° d ° ° III°o /1 �I M 111 6. WHERE NEW PAVEMENT IS TO BE PLACED OVER CURBED ISLANDS THAT HAVE o o 4 M °° �� ° �� III a --� 1 N I BEEN REMOVED, CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE AGGREGATE BASE & BINDER `.D • 13 — r- — j - — — — H - ,��/ ;is/ a� dd;`r ° i ° 1 I1 COURSE MATCHING THE EXISTING PAVEMENT SECTIONS PRIOR TO PLACEMENT = Y o X c) a� - `` ° /p ,� �' , a 4� ° ° i v I 1 OF SURFACE COURSE. °r° O CD LL I I ° o ° °11 F 6 16 I I I I° Z I I 7. CONTRACTOR TO PERFORM PAVEMENT RESTORATION FOR ALL BUILDING '� c� N , �11 t _ PROPOSED — o I 0 1 FOOTINGS AND UTILITY INSTALLATIONS. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 8" a m 4.1 ' 1 7 IIIILI .7 RESTAURANT � z C I AGGREGATE BASE, 3" BINDER COURSE, AND 1.5" SURFACE COURSE OR a 1 N 00 J.. 0 2,519 SF a 26.2 17.8 E 0 MATCH THE EXISTING PAVEMENT SECTION, WHICHEVER IS GREATER. -0 1 d ° 5 1 I N 2o � 9 a (PROTOTYPE #2124) + ►� 1 a �s OI w z ° w-5 dg ..I 71_ ° a o I 8. AREAS OF PAVEMENT RESTORATION SHALL BE PROOF ROLLED TO DETERMINE a W .61 E I d 4 d 74.6' ° 0 1 U IF FULL DEPTH RESTORATION IS REQUIRED OR IF ONLY THE BITUMINOUS J " °' I , ° \%:\ I ° 115 S 1 1 MATERIAL •IS TO BE REPLACED. _ Z I �� d _ _ w I O d d O m ~ ° iii a ° �� ° T I BICYCLE RACKS 1 11 I Z i o 1111n , ° a d ° -z, 4� -�� ,� II— a III w 11 V) 0 I i N �� I > II 1° ° I Q III in b° T — _ _ _ _ _ _ 14 _ _ 1 - - 1 pe III Q 11 III 111 O Lo II 1 III w 1I w 1 NI -0I 1 11I Um' ° 0 II III I1 Z Z W r � '�1� v 1 Q Z 10V I, J �' I- in .- II1 1 1 a v, 11 O1 U in M Z o 0 z • 0 1 - 1 1 -1 - H + H - I- 1 1 - �� II 1 w 0 Z `16 4 /1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 - - II ZJ } Q 6, >, ::::: — � I6 61 I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I A I I I w > Q U ° w ,_ ' 1 I I > w w o o f I 1 Q Y • Q Q 1 1 11 � a °° o > I I 1 I � a W W a Q 141 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I II 2Q w J o Q 1 1 1 0 > � eLa 1V V 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I- w 0)� � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I II I CO w a ECO M � � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 III - w Q ( 11 Ce NJ III I 1 I w o a_ N ° 11 z o 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 III III a inZ 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 111 1 -111S10501 o L � � / 1J L 000 I 1 d 11 6 o I I I 1 Know what's below. SHEET NO. 0 m I I o 1 1 Call before you dig. III °' 1 1 11 1 1 � 20 40 60 j � ' - C200 ., U) O +, o GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET >0, � / J J 0 ITE Trip Generation Summary Sheets Land Use: 934 Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Through Window Description This land use includes any fast-food restaurant with a drive-through window. This type of restaurant is characterized by a large drive-through and large carry-out clientele, long hours of service (some are open for breakfast, all are open for lunch and dinner, some are open late at night or 24 hours a day) and high turnover rates for eat-in customers. The restaurant does not provide table service. A patron generally orders from a menu board and pays before receiving the meal. A typical duration of stay for an eat-in patron is less than 30 minutes. Fast casual restaurant (Land Use 930), high-turnover (sit-down) restaurant (Land Use 932), fast-food restaurant without drive-through window (Land Use 933), and fast-food restaurant with drive-through window and no indoor seating (Land Use 935) are related uses. Additional Data Users should exercise caution when applying statistics during the AM peak periods, as the sites contained in the database for this land use may or may not be open for breakfast. In cases where it was confirmed that the sites were not open for breakfast, data for the AM peak hour of the adjacent street traffic were removed from the database. If the restaurant has outdoor seating, its area is not included in the overall gross floor area. For a restaurant that has significant outdoor seating, the number of seats may be more reliable than GFA as an independent variable on which to establish a trip generation rate. The technical appendices provide supporting information on time-of-day distributions for this land use. The appendices can be accessed through either the ITETripGen web app or the trip generation resource page on the ITE website (https://www.ite.org/technical-resources/topics/trip- and-parking-generation/). The sites were surveyed in the 1980s, the 1990s, the 2000s, and the 2010s in Alaska, Alberta (CAN), California, Colorado, Florida, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Montana, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin. Source Numbers 163, 164, 168, 180, 181, 241, 245, 278, 294, 300, 301, 319, 338, 340, 342, 358, 389, 438, 502, 552, 577, 583, 584, 617, 640, 641, 704, 715, 728, 810, 866, 867, 869, 885, 886, 927, 935, 962, 977, 1050, 1053, 1054 724 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 5 ite Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Through Window (934) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA On a: Weekday Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 71 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA: 3 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 467.48 98.89- 1137.66 238.62 Data Plot and Equation 5000 X 4000 X X X -Na 3000 X w X XS< X a u - 7C X X X H i X 2000 X X ' X� X X X X X CSC X ` X X X X 1000 XX X XX XX X X X X XXXX X X XX X X X X X 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 X=1000 Sq.Ft.GFA X Study Site Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation:Not Given R2=*** ite General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 800-999) 725 Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Through Window (934) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA On a: Weekday, PM Peak Hour of Generator Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 135 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA: 3 Directional Distribution: 51% entering, 49% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 50.94 13.36- 159.07 24.91 Data Plot and Equation 500 X i i 400 ' X ' X X X X X 300 x X n X X X X F < X XX XX X XX •X : �� XX X X 200 X X X x xX ',X X X X xxk x x x �4'x' x x XXX x X X ->( xx xE x xxxxX x 100 xX x X X ,?S'XXX X X x X XXX X 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 X=1000 Sq.Ft.GFA X Study Site Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation:Not Given R2=*** ite General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 800-999) 729 Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Through Window (934) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 190 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA: 3 Directional Distribution: 52% entering, 48% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 33.03 8.77- 117.22 17.59 Data Plot and Equation 400 X X 300 x X X X X i X X X x X 200 XXX x X X X X II X x os< X X XX X X X XX. x X XXXK >o< 'XxX X X X X X X''% X X 100 � XXx,XX X X XX xx xX X x< x x,, X X x x 3b(x- X • X >S'c x x x X X X 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 X=1000 Sq.Ft.GFA X Study Site Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation:Not Given R2=*** ite General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 800-999) 727 Level of Service Criteria LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA Signalized Intersections Average Control Level of Delay Service Interpretation (seconds per vehicle) A Favorable progression. Most vehicles arrive during the <10 green indication and travel through the intersection without stopping. B Good progression, with more vehicles stopping than for >10 - 20 Level of Service A. C Individual cycle failures (i.e., one or more queued vehicles >20 - 35 are not able to depart as a result of insufficient capacity during the cycle)may begin to appear. Number of vehicles stopping is significant, although many vehicles still pass through the intersection without stopping. D The volume-to-capacity ratio is high and either progression >35 - 55 is ineffective, or the cycle length is too long. Many vehicles stop and individual cycle failures are noticeable. E Progression is unfavorable. The volume-to-capacity ratio >55 - 80 is high, and the cycle length is long. Individual cycle failures are frequent. F The volume-to-capacity ratio is very high, progression is >80.0 very poor, and the cycle length is long. Most cycles fail to clear the •ueue. Unsignalized Intersections Level of Service Average Total Delay(SEC/VEH) A 0 - 10 B > 10 - 15 C > 15 - 25 D >25 - 35 E > 35 - 50 F > 50 Source: Hi:hwa Casaci Manual,2010. Capacity Analysis Summary Sheets Existing Weekday Midday Peak Hour HCM 6th TWSC 6: Cedar Avenue & North Access Drive 09/15/2022 Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 0.6 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4'44 ft+ r Traffic Vol,veh/h 0 95 0 1470 1353 156 Future Vol,veh/h 0 95 0 1470 1353 156 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 - - - 130 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 98 98 98 98 98 98 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 5 6 1 Mvmt Flow 0 97 0 1500 1381 159 Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 691 - 0 - 0 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.1 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.9 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 336 0 - - - Stage 1 0 - 0 - - - Stage 2 0 - 0 - - - Platoon blocked,% - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 336 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 20 0 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity(veh/h) - 336 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.289 - - HCM Control Delay(s) - 20 - - HCM Lane LOS - C - - HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) - 1.2 - - MDEX 22-285 Popeye's Restaurant-MN 10:06 am 09/15/2022 Existing Weekday Midday Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report sa Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 9: 153rd Street & ALDI Access Drive 09/15/2022 Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 4.4 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations 44' Traffic Vol,veh/h 29 223 213 166 157 47 Future Vol,veh/h 29 223 213 166 157 47 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 2 2 1 3 0 Mvmt Flow 32 242 232 180 171 51 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 412 0 - 0 507 206 Stage 1 - - - - 322 - Stage 2 - - - - 185 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - - 6.86 6.9 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.86 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.86 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - - 3.53 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1158 - - - 493 807 Stage 1 - - - - 704 - Stage 2 - - - - 825 - Platoon blocked,% - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1158 - - - 477 807 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 477 - Stage 1 - - - - 681 - Stage 2 - - - - 825 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay,s 1 0 16.7 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity(veh/h) 1158 - - - 527 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.027 - - - 0.421 HCM Control Delay(s) 8.2 0.1 - - 16.7 HCM Lane LOS A A - - C HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 2.1 MDEX 22-285 Popeye's Restaurant-MN 10:06 am 09/15/2022 Existing Weekday Midday Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report sa Page 2 Capacity Analysis Summary Sheets Existing Weekday Evening Peak Hour HCM 6th TWSC 6: Cedar Avenue & North Access Drive 09/15/2022 Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 1.7 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4'44 ft+ r Traffic Vol,veh/h 0 95 0 1543 2323 154 Future Vol,veh/h 0 95 0 1543 2323 154 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 - - - 130 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 3 3 1 Mvmt Flow 0 101 0 1641 2471 164 Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 1236 - 0 - 0 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.1 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.9 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 146 0 - - - Stage 1 0 - 0 - - - Stage 2 0 - 0 - - - Platoon blocked,% - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 146 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 72.1 0 0 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity(veh/h) - 146 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.692 - - HCM Control Delay(s) - 72.1 - - HCM Lane LOS - F - - HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) - 4 - - PMEX 22-285 Popeye's Restaurant-MN 10:25 am 09/15/2022 Existing Weekday Evening Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report sa Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 9: 153rd Street & ALDI Access Drive 09/15/2022 Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 5 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations 44' Traffic Vol,veh/h 35 262 233 167 168 57 Future Vol,veh/h 35 262 233 167 168 57 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 2 0 1 1 0 Mvmt Flow 38 285 253 182 183 62 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 435 0 - 0 563 218 Stage 1 - - - - 344 - Stage 2 - - - - 219 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - - 6.82 6.9 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.82 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.82 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - - 3.51 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1135 - - - 459 792 Stage 1 - - - - 692 - Stage 2 - - - - 799 - Platoon blocked,% - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1135 - - - 441 792 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 441 - Stage 1 - - - - 664 - Stage 2 - - - - 799 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay,s 1.1 0 19.1 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity(veh/h) 1135 - - - 497 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.034 - - - 0.492 HCM Control Delay(s) 8.3 0.1 - - 19.1 HCM Lane LOS A A - - C HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 2.7 PMEX 22-285 Popeye's Restaurant-MN 10:25 am 09/15/2022 Existing Weekday Evening Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report sa Page 2 Capacity Analysis Summary Sheets Year 2025 Total Projected Weekday Midday Peak Hour HCM 6th TWSC 6: Cedar Avenue & North Access Drive 10/24/2022 Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 0.9 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4'44 ft+ r Traffic Vol,veh/h 0 124 0 1542 1394 189 Future Vol,veh/h 0 124 0 1542 1394 189 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 - - - 130 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 98 98 98 98 98 98 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 5 6 1 Mvmt Flow 0 127 0 1573 1422 193 Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 711 - 0 - 0 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.1 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.9 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 326 0 - - - Stage 1 0 - 0 - - - Stage 2 0 - 0 - - - Platoon blocked,% - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 326 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 22.9 0 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity(veh/h) - 326 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.388 - - HCM Control Delay(s) - 22.9 - - HCM Lane LQS - C - - HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) - 1.8 - - MDPR 22-285 Popeye's Restaurant-MN 10:35 am 09/15/2022 2025 Projected Weekday Midday Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report sa Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 9: 153rd Street & ALDI Access Drive 10/24/2022 Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 5.9 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations 44' Traffic Vol,veh/h 35 230 220 206 196 54 Future Vol,veh/h 35 230 220 206 196 54 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 2 2 1 2 0 Mvmt Flow 38 250 239 224 213 59 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 463 0 - 0 552 232 Stage 1 - - - - 351 - Stage 2 - - - - 201 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - - 6.84 6.9 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - - 3.52 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1109 - - - 464 776 Stage 1 - - - - 684 - Stage 2 - - - - 813 - Platoon blocked,% - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1109 - - - 445 776 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 445 - Stage 1 - - - - 657 - Stage 2 - - - - 813 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay,s 1.2 0 21.1 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity(veh/h) 1109 - - - 490 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.034 - - - 0.555 HCM Control Delay(s) 8.4 0.1 - - 21.1 HCM Lane LOS A A - - C HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 3.3 MDPR 22-285 Popeye's Restaurant-MN 10:35 am 09/15/2022 2025 Projected Weekday Midday Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report sa Page 2 Capacity Analysis Summary Sheets Year 2025 Total Projected Weekday Evening Peak Hour HCM 6th TWSC 6: Cedar Avenue & North Access Drive 10/24/2022 Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 3.2 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4'44 ft+ r Traffic Vol,veh/h 0 117 0 1613 2405 179 Future Vol,veh/h 0 117 0 1613 2405 179 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 - - - 130 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 3 3 1 Mvmt Flow 0 124 0 1716 2559 190 Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 1280 - 0 - 0 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.1 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.9 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 137 0 - - - Stage 1 0 - 0 - - - Stage 2 0 - 0 - - - Platoon blocked,% - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 137 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 116.4 0 0 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity(veh/h) - 137 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.909 - - HCM Control Delay(s) - 116.4 - - HCM Lane LOS - F - - HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) - 6.1 - - PMPR 22-285 Popeye's Restaurant-MN 10:35 am 09/15/2022 Projected Weekday Evening Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report sa Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 9: 153rd Street & ALDI Access Drive 10/24/2022 Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 6.4 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations 44' Traffic Vol,veh/h 39 271 241 193 194 62 Future Vol,veh/h 39 271 241 193 194 62 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 2 0 1 1 0 Mvmt Flow 42 295 262 210 211 67 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 472 0 - 0 599 236 Stage 1 - - - - 367 - Stage 2 - - - - 232 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - - 6.82 6.9 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.82 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.82 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - - 3.51 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1100 - - - 435 772 Stage 1 - - - - 674 - Stage 2 - - - - 788 - Platoon blocked,% - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1100 - - - 415 772 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 415 - Stage 1 - - - - 643 - Stage 2 - - - - 788 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay,s 1.2 0 23.4 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity(veh/h) 1100 - - - 467 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.039 - - - 0.596 HCM Control Delay(s) 8.4 0.2 - - 23.4 HCM Lane LOS A A - - C HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 3.8 PMPR 22-285 Popeye's Restaurant-MN 10:35 am 09/15/2022 Projected Weekday Evening Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report sa Page 2 12/8/2022 Apple ValleySquare 7th Addition & Site Plan & Building Permit Plan Review City Council 12-08-2022 AppValley Actions Requested 1. Adopt a resolution approving a subdivision by preliminary plat of Lot 2, Block 1, Apple Valley Square 4th Addition, into two lots by Apple Valley Square 7th Addition, subject to conditions. 2. Adopt a resolution approving a variance for the required number of parking stalls from 405 stalls to 340 stalls (65 parking stall variance) for Lot 1, Block 1, Apple Valley Square 7th Addition, subject to conditions. 3. Adopt a resolution approving a conditional use permit for a Class II restaurant with drive-through and a variance to reduce the required separation distance for a Class II restaurant from a residential use from 1,000 ft. to 506 ft. on Lot 2, Block 1, Apple Valley Square 7th Addition, subject to conditions. 4. Adopt a resolution approving a site plan/building permit authorization for a 2,519-sq. ft. Popeyes restaurant on Lot 2, Block 1, Apple Valley Square 7th Addition, subject to conditions. Apple iiey 1 12/8/2022 Site Location - ___ .. .1.7_,...............6 , _ r 4 # m i • 7575 153rd St. W. k. I `', --if , • Location of Aldi and f.. """„ 1�F. . V . -K Burlington Coat � itProposed� ",,,,, - - Y w Factor �q� _, ��,� � Subdivision p ��' , • In 2018 City Approved _ r , ,,, ris �, , a preliminary plat for 1!:v17 iiii _f■ a .52 acre site V . .. / // ' 1 , -- • Approval lapsed ; ._ , /!' ' ` after 1-year • ‘ ' r ' -G,i,i - �/ E,n 1w Apple f/ T F a Hey - - - — Site Zoning DVlT1 J1 WY 150TH ST W r J . a w Z q 0 a PD-244 w x 151ST ST W w ce " SITE PD-244 w a a 0 I--\ II J o l 1 Apple —i Io 153RDST� 1 1 Valley 2 12/8/2022 Preliminary Plat BUSTING LEGAL DESCRPTICRI: Clear Trtle No.519,Cli Lot 2.Bt.1.Apple Valley Square 4th Addition.Dakota County,Minnesota. October,11,182.rect..NOVer11.1"12„1 BIEI2..Document No 0113.20,as APPLE VALLEY SQUARE 7TH ADDITION J un e 30 1086 as Document No 72,2555 ki Me Office of...Count,Recorder OWNERS I DEVELOPERS SURVEYOR i APP.Vale],Minnesota Realty LLC .G 7300 Mill Street West 70.00 International Drive Sule41:12 Surto 5S0 ....ow.... 'i I WI,I D52,222,3q3D, g52-42.8Vg EOM.599 Existing IT, 11 0 1 _,__ --I , . Lot 2 Moo..,3D.2 473 sq.,El g4 acres 1 il . ''' 1 Lot 1,13lock.1.27D 783,A-El 42 acres Lot 2 Block 1=22,000,A 0 52 acres if[i i I / 4:1 i' i 1:,: ZONED:RD-Retail Business IPer City oi App.VaMey website, V 1 7''''''''' 11 NOCK i Sele=15 feet ''' 1 . 1' Rear=15 feet Street=30 feet ,... .''''''''1 lti i r'"r' ''''I 7.— 1.'r--'' '' r Parlinetioacks Front.15-feet ...'k._), ,___ __-- ,----- ---,,,,H 1 i Street=20 feet ----- - - r i'14— ' 1 ; UENCHINUIR: 37.5 south and 40 S.eaat of Nu sir planter box comer 4.S.S.:.9 Ele,D55'12.RAVDSSO. AppleVal ....._.. ---- abr..tench...is M1DDT monument VALLEY Ele,r-.47 895 0.IAVD8B, ley 1 , J P1_001320. ' mcertainly T.surveyed property show,on..survey map is in Flood Zone X [Room.,2D-11 Overall ,,..,,..4.0 ..,T.,,,...,_\ A 0 Site , _ [1, 0.„.k.1.._,...,.. k ....4, iluitiac f....„.„. , .... ....._ '-.47.4,im-ggiil.7:14.6' - ----- Plan ra ' 1 d 0 (.) ,.... ....,.., -, 41 ---,II: / rj ....._ jr- >, PALEMElfr LEGEND - \\-..easaountnen aTacv.—J° li = _ I c „, Fa:7w a SRE SUMMARY _ 1-4 I 72.9'......... Z.Z27:=..... 1 .... ......... I. i INSET A 1 PARKING CALCULATIONS_ 1- ... . -,.. .., • ... I' .- :76 ..... .. .. ? == 7 7:.'81 Ill i 1 1 1;1-11, ' ,,, i ...•,........ . 1 .......,,,,,,,....... ' v.? Apple 153RD STREET SIM TOTALS Valley — ..... .., 3 12/8/2022 Popeyes Site Plan _____.... -7- -1,-Ii---1 4 t .____ la,..41.140,. ...., 0 ,, 1 . /4-.0' P. p ~ : O Al- �- c=i1:1 c -. � M o- is M Ii • �r 0 66 5 0 0 ., PROPOSED 1 I 1 -7 1 RESTAURANT 6 2,519 Sr 26. , 17.9' I I,, r ^ (PROTOTYPE#2124) .• �. 1 1s 11I1 '71 t 74.6' 1--. ® 8 I moo• I11. 3 I . O ry n..® rYP APPVaIIey II LD rn. . to Utility Plan , , , _.,,.L , ILERIIIIIIrtrg 111 — :, ....m....... .e e t inn i�a:• - p ,—..-1-- =,,,,,a ��pp _J 1 LJ __ __ - __ a,.�,� I,� tI'r 1 I� 1 Ir �'=, vl� Ifls nay �w32:- ��O� Owe ...., y ,! �i4 �41„. ,nz _ ] r p�rcammnls AaxaF tl1• - 4 n LIII-INS , "1 II, 11, ' I 1 11 1 41-F:c C., !• pxnoxrewmoxmaesmau i 11 FFe=34m - -- if 1 Yi L- `--_ I-I+_I- t. it11 i.° 1 II I , 1 II II 111 ; 1 I IL Apple 11 _ ,_I �-` valley _,,,.. ICI 1" 1 \ 4 12/8/2022 Popeyes Grading Plan ,,, ,,„• =,,,,,__„,c,„0. vy mo irj 1 1 ,2 n. I /V :Cfr •-.... 8.9., I I I 1 I \, : ':.:L1'-. u L _1.-----_ __ pi ,,,,,,,i. -':. :-1 : !. :, ,• - ''';-7 -, r,,, _.; . I': I .1:I5.T6.- :IN t0'. 1. 1 -.—in-1 ID 2' S ,... SE.54 I -.e I )1411111 = _ La L i I ; 1 ... .- ...', I ...ii 11EET.._-.ANT LEEMal Er I) W.'"— 11 ...., I L.:0 i 2 Ylii. F 131...91r' -.1'r" t' 0 r. FFE-9S4 Pa •a I =1217 -: I I I 1 — I I :J.:": '-' ''17 1(1 1 1; d IIIII I ... Il I 1 ie„ --.--- E =i . I . I Valley j .., ISTI rAmSErrIM :Imr1 ,1'. ..--" App-.----- II EMEIM2KEEN , _ _......_ 4. Iii:;;Lo iumol : ' _ ? ..,.M.r p 'Et= ,P - r,:j.am 19%,12 STUN 4EwEI 1 -=-' 1,_Ll_1111111L '11,1III " . 1 1 0 ' , , , • 14--t 1 .-'VW*, •.- - • -,jireakirm•R Landscape Plan 1 „ , „ ,i4,,Li,_ t .1,_,. 11, -. ' 7:z:!. III 404 '4•1tittg•Wai•ilit-,;:VAW ITA • , • 1 1 1 17-1111 . ' Existing Site •, , ._ . ' , Ilii II , HI ,i 1 , El1 1LL 1 1 , : '„ PLANT SCHEDULE " „ , , , , TREES CODE OTT BOTANICAL1COMMON NAME SIZE ROOT i t 1 i h #-1,- `jt-t tt rt Isffi 11 : 111 : : 11 I 1 1 COa 0 CcEoLmTm1S00mCHAC I DcErR3TEALRRISy 25'CAL BEB ,I litIJL_ Ii_l iL_1 HL.11hWli. 4,"" 1 r , I, GINKGO SI LORA AUTUMN GOLD TM 0 GA 12 ..._ T AUTUMN GOLC MAIDENHAIR TREE 25 CAL BEE Ii1,..] , 1 1 I ki: MS 6 IMSPRIGXSNSOPRIMI"S"PPWLE 0 25'CAL BEE 11 -'--1-4- i 1 1--1 1 %Ltd -1--t"I r _ ---. ,,,,, 4 I—F ;r r_ _1,-2 , _. st, _ i_ .,„,,_ 1 1 •i m. Apple. Valley - ..rk _L,_-— .-. 5 12/8/2022 Popeyecz Landscape Plan C �w ; : _ 1 l t "e�m"' , lu iii:� ��i, t� IIi.�4 1 Y�-:= —BT----`--W., ---�-- `"'(S�L, .� LIT---_" O0)EA b.";..�: ----8--4M— 1. U------b0 G----- /per,.. - 1 T'li= 1-7 MI Ire / (f5) BT 25.4' I■ �>< ' PROPOSED 1 g (10) BU RESTAURANT � 1(• �'�all 1�u.'• _m� (PROTOTYPE #2124) I :_ (10) BU j 1 . � V® :� f Apple 1 -gE gE----)$ IL..II " -,-J J' IcY Apple - --tr--4 �;,• . � I s ova x� 0 — -- _ Popeye Planting Schedule TAG QTV 1 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME 1 COND. SIZE REMARKS PRICE TREE AF 4 Acer xfreemanii'Armstrong' Armstrong Red Maple B&B 25"dal.1411.4Wd Full,well shaped $590 $2,360 C❑ 5 Gymnocladus Alo€cus Kentucky Catleetree B&B 2.5•'cal.6A111.41vd Full,well shaped $600 $3,009 PG 6 Picea elaura'Densata Black Hills Spruce B&B 25•'rah 6AT9.41rid Full,well shaped $618 34,944 EVERGREEN SHRUB BU 54 Baxus x'Glencoe' Cnirageland Green Browned g5 cant. 36.11.x M.A. Full,mecums $90 $4,060 BT 16 Berberisihunbergii Japanese Barberry 45 cont. 36"1.1.x 24.4id. Full,Vigorous $10 $5,320 10 17 Ilex x'Red Beauty Red Beauty Holly #3 cont. 36'hl.x 24•wd. Full,vyaaus MO $1,100 CA 42 Cletha alnifolia Summersweet CIelha 45 cont. 36111.x 36bd. Full,vigorous $50 $2,100 GROUNDCOVER SEED 4,9755F $0.25/SF $1,243 APPROXIMATE ESTIMATED BUILDING VALUE:.4-$g00,000.00 2.5%BUILDING VALUE=N$22,500.00 PLANT MATERIAL REQUIRED TOTAL PLANT MATERIAL COST'. .1-25,52709 AppValley 6 12/8/2022 ,. I , I .--s 1 _ - ; I. ! Separation ='; i , ;E E Distance . , . , 1 ._ .. i , . . Varianceii . ,-E- 9 _ . h r nearby users _ �� ✓ . . • I. I u Other ea by _ exist closer than E 17.. .41 this restaurant - I 4;ffi( © Apple PARKING CALCULATIONS Required LAND USE CLASSIFICATION(LOT 2) RETAIL STORE(S) PARKING SPACES REQUIRED 1 SPACE PER 150 SF LIP TO 20,000 SF, (155.3790-RETAIL STORE) THEN 1 SPACE PER 200 SF Pa r k i n g GROSS FLOOR ACTUAL RETAIL AREA AREA ILO [S ALDI 12,453 BURLINGTON 11 Variance BURLINGTON UNUSED FUTURE APPLE VALLEY SQUARE(TOTAL) 11 126 72 10115 (20,0001150)+((72,716-20,000y200)_ REQUIRED PARKING SPACES 397 • 75 stall parking LAND USE CLASSIFICATION(LOT 1) CLASS II RESTAURANT variance requested PARKING SPACES REQUIRED I SPACE PER 3SEATS • Popeyes site meets (155.379P2) code PARKING SPACES REQUIRED 24 TOTAL SEATS f3= a • Existing site would no longer meet SITE TOTALS code requirements REQUIRED PROVIDED •{iii LOT1 8 18 Apple lley without a variance LOT2 397 322 TOTAL 405 340 7 12/8/2022 Building Elevations ...._ r ..I win ... ,. 11 ,.....z6=.....t..,_,..-...:„..17i, - . o® _---E- ,=, ... 7, �rnoioi ioi0000�r .....,..� i n�.� . gWil, 8 a ell s �-- 4 7 L " , `.. al _.. ...._. �_ Q 4 ...:.a.. ^w , • I iii,z MOD E®®Bi■❑®B� ,'....„� L S gymi w...d.n ■D MEI E ��C� r Front/West Rear/East 4 : " 'valley Building Elevations mm o om OEM o om El UM om o om om iiiiii South cI®®�®■.�®®■..®o ■®®� 1��• " //ram-� ,/E ir9P7:0Pir .021,1•4fr rr ;:F:::°:°:;._7P,:ii::::-zEzszzz::::::E:::i::!;:.=E....,:::;;:;;;;:;= om m m o� m * m® i 1 " f S:.e , :III 4 North — — _ inr I L m wVaiiey mm J eves J J mm v c mm m m mmm m m m m Apo 8 12/8/2022 Floor Plan AP s ,,,_____ , . ,-7. --- -. ._„„",,, == _fr7,1 I 77- r Hi I Il, 1! , ` I i, i I 0llll1llll. 1II III aI III'a � � � �=1 „ In „ � �I m ;, i IIII iAn• .x. 11 z —R __ j— I ;_ n =L !:, .4� FL E n® II ,1:a � A HIDE ®®sum . . IIII� [•Iu• : I I Zi-i. — __ n `- I % ♦ Illl ii i °r ,;: lJ � IsIIT II Im 1 .1 1'4� I I— --- : II —,.y (IIII I . 37-P L Y_I n T "". I Irl,l _ n Him Ili D II ,.-- x � �10 1 __ I - o n 4 � Mrrl...- .MIE wxI , ` I1 I� 1. u DO ® n ` © '. , r , � e - c 1I ; (mite _ w�. - � ` v Ijr—li}' WIWms r Inr��4� � u � I - F� ___ AppV 0 alley Action Requested 1. Adopt a resolution approving a subdivision by preliminary plat of Lot 2, Block 1, Apple Valley Square 4th Addition, into two lots by Apple Valley Square 7th Addition, subject to conditions. 2. Adopt a resolution approving a variance for the required number of parking stalls from 405 stalls to 340 stalls (65 parking stall variance) for Lot 1, Block 1, Apple Valley Square 7th Addition, subject to conditions. 3. Adopt a resolution approving a conditional use permit for a Class II restaurant with drive-through and a variance to reduce the required separation distance for a Class II restaurant from a residential use from 1,000 ft. to 506 ft. on Lot 2, Block 1, Apple Valley Square 7th Addition, subject to conditions. 4. Adopt a resolution approving a site plan/building permit authorization for a 2,519-sq. ft. Popeyes restaurant on Lot 2, AppValley Block 1, Apple Valley Square 7th Addition, subject to conditions. 9 • ••• ITEM: 5.E. ..... .... Apple COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 8, 2022 Valley SECTION: Regular Agenda Description: City Fee Schedule Staff Contact: Department/ Division: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk City Clerk's Office ACTION REQUESTED: 1. Hold a public hearing on the proposed Fee Schedule. 2. Adopt the resolution approving the City's Fee Schedule, effective January 1, 2023. SUMMARY: Attached for your consideration is a resolution approving the City's Fee Schedule, which sets fees and charges for various products and services. If approved, the Fee Schedule would be effective January 1, 2023. The fees and text that are currently in effect appear in black. The amendments are listed under "Proposed Fees" or in red. Proposed changes include additions, deletions, and revisions to cemetery fees, City fees and materials, consultant and engineering services, building inspections and permits, licenses and permits, subdivision and development fees, utility fees, and zoning. The Departments/Divisions submitting changes indicate the proposed rates more accurately reflect costs associated with the same or are a result of increased fees being charged the City. Inspections, license, and permit fees were revised to recover costs. The Consumer Price Index (CPI) for last year was 8.2%. Water, sewer, and storm drainage utility trunk charges and construction-related items were increased 8.2%. Water, sanitary sewer, storm drainage and street light utility quarterly/monthly charges have increased 5%, 5%, 10% and 10%, respectively. In addition to the changes mentioned above, other minor modifications were made in order to help clarify and simplify the schedule. BACKGROUND: Proper notice of the public hearing was published as required by law. BUDGET IMPACT: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit Resolution Exhibit Description Current Proposed Required by Fees Fees Section CEMETERY FEES 92.15 Additions 11-15: Resident with marker privileges $1,835.00 $1,985.00 Non-resident with marker privileges $3,670.00 $3,970.00 Resident with monument privileges $2,485.00 $2,685.00 Non-resident with monument privileges $1,970.00 $5,370.00 Addition 30: Resident with marker privileges $820.00 $885.00 Non-resident with marker privileges $1,610.00 $1,770.00 Resident with monument privileges $1,380.00 $1,490.00 Non-resident with monument privileges $2,760.00 $2,980.00 Additions 31-33,36-38: Resident with marker privileges $1,000.00 $1,080.00 Non-resident with marker privileges $2,000.00 $2,160.00 Resident with monument privileges $1,565.00 $1,690.00 Non-resident with monument privileges $3,130.00 $3,380.00 Addition 34/35: Single Boulder Double Boulder Resident Non- Resident Non-resident resident $2,165.00 $1,930.00 $2,850.00 $5,700.00 $2,665.00 $5,330.00 $3,085.00 $6,170.00 Page 1 Description Current Proposed Required by Fees Fees Section Additions 50/53: Single Niche Double Niche Level Resident Non- Resident Non-resident resident 1 $1,300.00 $2,600.00 $2,125.00 $4,250.00 $1,405.00 $2,810.00 $2,300.00 $4,600.00 2 $1,370.00 $2,740.00 $2,265.00 $4,530.00 $1,480.00 $2,960.00 $2,450.00 $4,900.00 3 $1,460.00 $2,920.00 $2,400.00 $4,800.00 $1,580.00 $3,160.00 $2,595.00 $5,190.00 4 $1,610.00 $3,220.00 $2,660.00 $5,320.00 $1,740.00 $3,480.00 $2,880.00 $5,760.00 5 $1,695.00 $3,390.00 $2,715.00 $5,430.00 $1,835.00 $3,670.00 $2,940.00 $5,880.00 6 $1,520.00 $3,040.00 $2,535.00 $5,070.00 $1,645.00 $3,290.00 $2,740.00 $5,480.00 6 Corner $1,520.00 $3,040.00 N/A N/A $1,645.00 $3,290.00 Administrative Transfer $4-8.00 $20.00 per document Columbarium Niche Name Plate(additional or inscription) $105.00 $440.00 Columbarium Niche Vase $190.00 $205.00 Cremation Boulder Emblem $210.00 $230.00 Cremation Boulder Portrait $340.00 $370.00 Cremation Boulder Scroll(each additional) $160.00 $500.00 Interment/(Opening)and Disinterment Fees: Columbarium niche(includes memorialization plaque $710.00 $770.00 and one inscription) Columbarium niche re-open and close $200.00 $215.00 Cremation boulder(includes 2 scrolls) $8-50.00 $920.00 Vault-adult(over four feet) $1,760.00 $1,900.00 Vault-child(two feet one-inch to four feet) $1,080.00 $1,170.00 Vault-cremation $1,230.00 $1,330.00 Vault-infant(under two feet) $7-8-5,00 $840.00 Monuments and Markers Locating Fee $445-.00 $155.00 Outer Cremation Container $4-500 $170.00 Overtime Fee(for services after 2:00 p.m.) $445-.00 $155.00 per hour Right of Subsequent Burial(second,third,etc.) 50%of current lot cost Title Change Fee(owner deceased) $63.00 $70.00 per certificate Weekend/Holiday Fee(any activity) $675.00 $730.00 Page 2 Description Current Proposed Required by Fees Fees Section CITY FEES AND MATERIALS Administrative Processing: Assessment charges for deseased tree removal: Administrative fee(in addition to total costs) $60.00 Interest for unpaid amounts levied for collection 8% Assessment terms: Total Costs Years Assessed $1.00-$699.99 1 $700.00-$1,399.99 2 $1400.00-$2,099.99 3 over$2,100.00 4 Nuisance invoice $50.00 Tax-exempt conduit(private activitiy revenue bonds)issuance fee First$10,000,000.00 1% Amounts over$10,000,000.00 0.5% Host City approval(minimum$5,000.00) 0.125% Antenna Site Leases: 1 -9 antennas(annual) $35,815.00 $38,752.00 Each additional antenna or reserve space of antenna(annual) $2,236.00 $2,419.00 Annual lease adjustment 3.5%or CPI (whichever is greater or negotiable) Escrow-equipment upgrades/modifications(administration and Actual cost plus 10% plan review,agreement modifications and amendments, engineering and field inspections) Escrow-new installation(engineering and field inspections) Actual cost plus 10% Ground space-300 sq.ft. Included in lease Ground space-greater than 300 sq.ft. (annual) $-3,24 $3.51 sq.ft. New installation application fee(administration review and $2,804.00 $3,034.00 agreement preparation) Small cell application fee(first five sites) $5 00 $568.00 97.11 each site after first five 405,00 $114.00 Copies: CD $5.00 DVD's of meetings $25.00 Oversized commercial building plans $5.00 Photocopies $0.25 False Alarm Charges: 130.42 Fourth and each subsequent Fire response in any calendar year $350.00 Franchise Fees and Other Fees Charged by Franchise Holders: 119 Cable: Percent of gross revenues 5% 119.28 Cable: PEG fee $.75 mo. 119.27(D)(1) Electric: Percent of gross on each account not to exceed$25.00 per month: Single family residential 2% Multiple family residential 2% Page 3 Description Current Proposed Required by Fees Fees Section Commercial/Industrial 2% Institutional 2% Gas: (None established at this time) 119.52 Maps: Land use $2.50 Street-color(first one to residents/AV businesses no charge) $2.50 Zoning $2.50 Property/Ownership Information from Dakota County PID System $5.00 35.25 (per address) Police&Fire Services: Accident photos(compact disc) $5.00 Audio tape copies of statements(compact disc) $5.00 Dog license owners list $50.00 Finger printing non-resident(2 sets of cards) $20.00 Finger printing resident(2 sets of cards) $10.00 Letters of clear record $10.00 Police and Fire background check for daycare/foster care $6.00 Police extra-duty pay rate(minimum 4-hour charge) $90.00 $96.00 hour (effective December 1,2018) Squad car/body worn camera DVD copies Acutal cost of labor and materials Return Check Charge $30.00 Special Assessment-County Processing $4.60 per parcel Special Assessment Search-Written Copy $25.00 Utility New Customer List-Electronic File $50.00 Zoning Compliance Letter $39.00 $42.00 155.395 Page 4 Description Current Proposed Required by Fees Fees Section CONSULTANT AND ENGINEERING FEES 153.79 City Engineering Design and Contract Administration Fee Table: Construction Cost _ Fee=%of Construction Cost $0-$250,000.00 7.20% $250,000.00-$500,000.00 _ 5.90% $500,000.00-$750,000.00 5.40% $750,000.00-$1,000,000.00 5.10% $1,000,000.00-$2,000,000.00 4.70% City Engineering Hourly Rates: Administrative Specialist $7-2,00 $78.00 Assistant City Engineer $151 00 $164.00 City Engineer $168.00 $182.00 Civil Engineer $100 $142.00 Engineering/Construction Technician I $ 00 $95.00 Engineering/Construction Technician II $110.00 $120.00 Engineering/Construction Technician III $131.00 $142.00 Engineering Intern $-53,00 $58.00 GIS Technician $101.00 $110.00 Natural Resources Coordinator $100 $142.00 Natural Resources Technician $88.00 $96.00 WaterResources Specialist $4103-.00 $112.00 Legal Hourly Rates(Dougherty,Molenda,Solfest,Hills&Bauer,P.A.): Development work $263.72 $271.63 Municipal Attorney $172.91 $178.13 Municipal Paralegal $108.15 $111.39 Page 5 Description Current Proposed Required by Fees Fees Section INSPECTIONS AND PERMITS Building Permits,Fire Alarm Systems,and Fire Suppression Systems: 150.04&93.21 Total Valuation Fee $1.00 to$500.00 $52.00 501.00 to 2,000.00 $52.00 for the first$500.00,plus$3.70 for each additional$100.00 or fraction thereon,to and including $2,000.00 2,001.00 to 25,000.00 $107.50 for the first$2,000.00,plus$17.50 for each additional$1,000.00 or fraction thereof,to and including$25,000.00 25,001.00 to 50,000.00 $510.00 for the first$25,000.00,plus$13.40 for each additional$1,000.00 or fraction thereof,to and including$50,000.00 50,001.00 to 100,000.00 $845.00 for the first$50,000.00,plus$9.15 for each additional$1,000.00 or fraction thereof,to and including$100,000.00 100,001.00 to 500,000.00 $1,302.50 for the first$100,000.00,plus$7.40 for each additional$1,000.00 or fraction thereof,to and including$500,000.00 500,001.00 to 1,000,000.00 $4,262.50 for the first$500,000.00,plus$6.18 for each additional$1,000.00 or fraction thereof,to and including$1,000,000.00 1,000,001.00 and up $7,352.50 for the first$1,000,000.00,plus$4.80 for each additional$1,000.00 or fraction thereof Commercial Flat Rate Permit Fees(plus state surcharge): 150.04 Commercial fireplace $126.58 $136.96 Commercial flat roof $197.91 $538.74 Commercial interior demolition $130.31 $141.00 Commercial pitched roof $172.73 $186.89 Electrical Permits and Inspections(plus state surcharge): 150.04 Carnival/event(minimum fee) $ $212.50 Commercial annual maintenance $572.09 $619.00 Commercial circuit/feeder: 0-200A up to 240V g $8.75 each 201-800A up to 240V $15.59 $16.87 each Page 6 Description Current Proposed Required by Fees Fees Section 0-200A above 240V $19.79 $21.41 each 201-800A above 240V $38.43 $41.58 each Concrete encased electrode $11.73 $48.40 Dakota County Saver Switch Program(one address) $20.56 Generator(residential) $11.73 $48.40 Load switch permit $14.73 $48.40 Luminaire retrofit modifications S-073-7 $0.40 per fixture Manufactured home $11.73 $48.40 New one or two family dwelling: Maximum of 400 ampere and 0-30 circuits $180.08 $194.85 31 or more circuits $&01 $8.75 each New multi-family structures: Up to 20 circuits(max of 3 trips) $105.95 $114.64 per unit Permit fee and/or trip charge(minimum): 1 trip charge(ex: final inspection only) $11.73 $48.40 2 trip charge(ex:rough in and final inspection) $89.46 $96.80 3 trip charge(ex:rough in,in floor heat,final inspection) $131.19 $145.20 Reattachment of exterior electrical components: Commercial buildings(hotels,motels,apaittuents,and $11.73 $48.40 each businesses) Residential buildings(single family homes) $11.73 $48.40 each Multiple units for townhomes,duplexes,and condominiums: First unit $11.73 $48.40 Each unit thereafter $2 $27.16 Recreational vehicle site $11.73 $48.40 Replacement load switch permit $19.00 $20.56 Separate bonding/grounding inspection $11.73 $48.40 Service upgrade(1 trip up to 30 circuits) $105.32 $113.96 Service upgrade(each additional circuit over 30) $&09 $8.75 Service upgrade with remodel(up to 3 trips and up to 30 circuits) $179.03 $193.71 Solar PV Installation: 0-5,000 watts $98.60 $106.69 5,001-10,000 watts $161.22 $177.69 10,001-20,000 watts $215.81 $265.97 20,001-30,000 watts $327.39 $354.24 30,001-40,000 watts $408.92 $442.45 40,001-1,000,000 watts $108.92 $442.45 Each additional 10,000 watts over 40,000 $39.69 $42.94 1,000,001-5,000,000 watts $1,337.50 $4,693.18 Each additional 10,000 watts over 1,000,000 $26.57 $28.75 5,000,001 watts and larger $11,796.11 $12,763.75 Each additional 10,000 watts over 5,000,000 $15.91 $17.21 Street,parking lot,outdoor lighting,and traffic standard $7.10 each Swimming pools(commercial and residential) $89.16 $96.80 Page 7 Description Current Proposed Required by Fees Fees Section Tech circuits-alarm communication,remote control, 8446 $1.26 and signal circuit(0-50 volts) Transformers for light,heat,and power: Up to 10 KVA $19.06 $20.62 each 11 KVA or more $38.17 $41.30 each Fire Flat Rate Permit Fee-Contract Valuation Multiplies by(plus state surcharge) $0.0163 Heating,Ventilation,Air Conditioning(HVAC),and Refrigeration Permits 150.04 and Inspections(plus state surcharge): New construction residential fees for new construction(built to IRC): Air conditioner $136.96 Fireplace $126.58 $136.96 Furnace only $126.58 $136.96 1 furnace and 1 A/C $126.58 $136.96 More than 1 furnace and/or A/C $176.93 $191.44 Existing All other residential(gas lines,bath fans,AC,etc.)(minimur $70.98 $76.80 New or existing commercial fees(built to IBC)valuation multiplies b $0.0163 (minimum$78.75 $85.20) State surcharge-permit fee multiplies by $0.0005 (minimum as determined by state-$1.00) Other Inspections and Fees(plus state surcharge): Avolve application fees for down payment(non-refundable): Fire/building/plumbing/mechanical/NRMP 25% of permit fee Electrical Q`� $56.81 Health-licensing inspections(minimum'/2 hour charge) $70.98 $76.80 per hour Investigation fee for work without a permit(not to exceed permit fee) $70.98 $76.80 per hour Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated $70.98 $76.80 per hour (minimum'/2 hour charge) Inspections outside of normal business hours $97.55 $105.55 per hour Move overweight structure $126.58 $136.96 Outdoor seating $70.98 $76.80 per trip Re-inspection fee: First re-inspection $36.02 $38.97 Each inspection thereafter $72.03 $77.94 Reissuance of certificate of occupancy inspection(minimum'Y2 hour) $70.98 $76.80 per hour charge) Special inspection fee $97.55 $105.55 per trip Page 8 Description Current Proposed Required by Fees Fees Section Plan Review Fee: 150.04 Additional plan review required by changes,additions,or $70.98 $76.80 per hour revisions to approved plans(minimum'/2 hour charge) Building permit plan review 65% of permit fee Commercial electrical plan review $92.77 $100.38 per hour Commercial and residential septic plan review $92.77 $100.38 per hour (minimum'/2 hour charge) Fire permit/fire sprinkler,suppression,and alarm plan review 65% of permit fee 150.01/93.21 Plan review fee for similar plans previously reviewed 25% of permit fee Pre-plan review fee(no existing permit) $70.98 $76.80 per hour (minimum 1/2 hour charge) Plumbing Permits&Inspections(plus state surcharge): 150.04 Plumbing installations: Commercial fee(built to IBC)valuation multiplies by $0.0163 (minimum$78.75 $85.20) Residential fee(built to IRC)per plumbing fixture $13.39 $14.49 (minimum$70.98 $76.80) Residential fee up to 2 valve replacements $27.62 $29.88 (water meter replacement program only) Backflow prevention(commercial and residential) $70.98 $76.80 Water heater or water softener $70.98 $76.80 Public Right of Way Excavation(driveway) $35.00 $79.00 96.06 Public Right of Way Obstruction Permit $1-800 $199.00 97.05(A) Public Right of Way Management Permit: Excavation permit(up to 100 linear feet) $199.00 $216.00 97.05 For every 1 linear foot in excess of 100 linear feet $0:24 $0.26 Obstruction permit $67.00 $73.00 97.05 Registration fee $50.00 $55.00 97.04 Residential Flat Rate Permit Fees(plus state surcharge): Attic insulation(existing home) $130.25 $140.93 Chimney repair $132.51 $143.38 Deck $172.73 $186.89 Deck repair $130.25 $140.93 Demolition(whole or interior) $130.25 $140.93 Drain tile(exterior) $172.73 $186.89 Page 9 Description Current Proposed Required by Fees Fees Section Fence(seven feet or higher) $130.25 $140.93 Mobile home installation $192.83 $208.64 Retaining wall over four feet high $172.73 $186.89 Retaining wall over eight feet high $215.01 $232.67 Roofing-re-roof single family home $172.73 $186.89 Roofing-multi-family attached homes(minimum 2 $79.51 $86.06 per unit attached units) Roofing repair(one plane) $130.25 $140.93 Siding $172.73 $186.89 Siding-multi-family attached homes(minimum 2 attached units) $79.54 $86.06 per unit Siding repair(one plane) $130.25 $140.93 Swimming pool(in or above ground) $130.25 $140.93 Window and door replacement(all changes and installs) $130.25 $140.93 Windows,roofing,and siding combination of two(one Q'� $288.57 residential home) Service Connection Inspection(plus state surcharge): 150.04 Combination sanitary sewer,storm sewer,and water $70.98 $76.80 Sanitary sewer $70.98 $76.80 Storm sewer $70.98 $76.80 Water $70.98 $76.80 State Surcharge Determined by state 150.04 Subsurface Sewage Treatment System(plus state surcharge) 51.58 Demo or removal $86.89 $94.01 New installation $515.63 $590.37 Repair or upgrade $86.89 $94.01 Vacation of Public Easements $196.00 153.31 153.79 Application escrow $519.00 $562.00 Application fee $196.00 $212.00 Page 10 Description Current Proposed Required by Fees Fees Section LICENSES AND PERMITS Adult Uses: Adult establishments $5,000.00 $5,250.00 110.19 Adult accessory use-high impact $2,000.00 110.19 Investigation fee $1,500.00 110.19 Change in corporation,partnership,or association $500.00 110.24 Amendment to license $77.00 110.25 Alcoholic Beverages: 3.2 percent malt liquor: 111.22(A) Off-sale $200.00 On-sale $500.00 On-sale temporary(up to 10 days) $50.00 Application fee $250.00 111.25(A) Consumption and display of intoxicating liquor: 111.51 Private club $300.00 Public place $300.00 Temporary(1 day) $25.00 Intoxicating and concessionaire liquor: Off-sale $200.00 111.42 On-sale: liquor sales under$275,000.00 $5,300.00 liquor sales$275,001.00 to$700,000.00 $6,700.00 liquor sales over$700,000.00 $8,000.00 On-sale club: under 200 members $300.00 201 to 500 members $500.00 501 to 1000 members $650.00 1001 to 2000 members $800.00 2001 to 4000 members $1,000.00 4001 to 6000 members $2,000.00 over 6000 members $3,000.00 On-sale cocktail room $600.00 111.42 On-sale Sunday $200.00 On-sale temporary liquor(1 to 4 days) $50.00 111.38 Application fee $500.00 111.25 Page 11 Description Current Proposed Required by Fees Fees Section Malt liquor: Off-sale $200.00 111.41 Off-sale Sunday $50.00 On-sale brewer taproom $600.00 111.40 On-sale Sunday $200.00 Application fee $500.00 111.25 Wine: 111.22(A) On-sale $1,500.00 Application fee $500.00 Additional investigation/application fees: 11.25(A) Amendment to license $100.00 Change in club director,officer,or committee member $120.00 Change in officer $120.00 Change in operating manager $120.00 Change in ownership or control $120.00 Civil penalty: 111.37 First violation $500.00 Second violation within 24 months $750.00 Third violation with in 24 months $1,500.00 Fourth violation with in 24 months Determined by City Council Annual Residential Parking Permit: $30.00 155.373 Cats: Animal pickup $30.00 Boarding fee $20.00 per day Cremation/disposal of animal $30.00 Quarantine boarding for cats $20.00 per day Euthanasia of animal $25.00 Catteries: 91.05 Origination fee $80.00 $82.00 Annual fee $75.00 $78.00 Christmas Tree Sale Lots: 114.21 License $440,00 $115.00 Clean up deposit $200.00 Page 12 Description Current Proposed Required by Fees Fees Section Dogs: 2-year licenses: 91.15 Male or female $20.00 Duplicated tag $5.00 Animal pickup $30.00 Boarding fee $30.00 per day Cremation/disposal of animal $40.00 Euthanasia of animal $30.00 Non-refundable hearing fee $250.00 91.20(C)(1) Quarantine boarding for dogs $30.00 per day Dangerous dog registration: 91.20 Annual fee $75.00 Registration tag $5.00 Warning symbol sign $14.00 Hobby kennels: 91.05 Origination fee $80.00 $82.00 Annual fee $75.00 $78.00 Extractions/Commercial Sand and Gravel: 150.15(A) Initial application fee $4,450.00 Annual fee $11,652.00 Escrow deposit $12,362.00 Fireworks-Consumer Sales: 120.03 Indoor retail sales $100.00 Outdoor retail sales $350.00 Fuel Dispensing Facility(per fueling position) $7400 $75.00 116.02(A) Gambling License Investigation Fee $250.00 112.35 Garbage and Refuse Collections: 50.04 First truck $4-800 $190.00 Each additional truck $69.00 $70.00 Page 13 Description Current Proposed Required by Fees Fees Section Manufactured Home Park: 151.04(A) Application fee $220.00 Annual inspection fee $55.00 151.06 Additional inspection fee for parks with over 25 $2.00 ea. lot occupied lots Final permit fee $7.00 ea.lot Massage Therapy Business: 123.03(B) Application fee $300.00 Initial investigation fee $300.00 Additional investigation/application fees: Change in owner/officer $ -20,00 $125.00 Change in on-site manager $120.00 $125.00 Amendment to license $77,00 $80.00 Massage Therapist: 123.03(B) New application fee $115.00 $120.00 Renewal application fee $81.00 $86.00 Outdoor Promotion Permit $5.00 Pawnbroker or Pawnbroker and Precious Metal Dealer: 117.07 Annual license fee $8,800.00 Deposit on investigation $2,500.00 Amendment to license $500.00 New operating officer investigation $120.00 $125.00 Transaction records fee $2.00 per record Reporting failure fee $160.00 day Photograph failure fee $160.00 day Peddlers and Solicitors: 114.03 Annual(per person) $439.00 $145.00 Temporary(per person) $88.00 $90.00 Precious Metal Dealers Only: 117.07(A) Annual license fee: 50 or fewer transactions $250.00 More than 50 transactions $500.00 Deposit on investigation fee $500.00 Amendment to license $77,00 $80.00 New operating officer investigation $120.00 $125.00 Page 14 Description Current Proposed Required by Fees Fees Section Transaction records fee $2.00 per record Reporting failure fee $160.00 day Photograph failure fee $160.00 day Signage: 154.04 Business signs $4-93-00 $209.00 Additional fee for business signs over 40 sq.ft. $1.00 per sq.ft. Handling fee for removal from right-of-way $15.00 Monument signs $2,009.00 Re-face existing sign $5.00 Temporary sign permit $5.00 Variance 834-0.00 $315.00 Special Event Permit: Permit application fee 100-500 participants $50.00 Over 500 participants $100.00 Tobacco or Tobacco Products(2-year license) $510.00 115.03 Civil penalty: 111.37 First violation $300.00 Second violation within 24 months $600.00 Third and subsequent violation(s)within 24 months $1,000.00 Tree Work $52.00 $55.00 152.43 Vending Cart $190.00 118.03 Page 15 Description Current Proposed Required by Fees Fees Section SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT FEES Commercial,Industrial,Public and/Multiple Residential Site Plan Review: $270.00 $281.00 153.21 155.404 Escrow Fees: 153.79& 155.404 Application Escrow Amount Comprehensive Plan amendment3 $1,159.00 $1,254.00 Conditional Use Permit3 $1,159.00 $1,254.00 Final planned development3 $3,091.00 for initial deposit $3,479.00 Final plat $774.00 $837.00 Final subdivision application) $3,091.00 for 1 to 3 lots- initial deposit $2,244.00 $6,178.00 for 4 or more lots-initial deposit $6,685.00 Impervious surface area(up to 5% $5 increase) $560.00 Interim Use Permit(when site plan is $771.00 involved)3 $871.00 Minor/corrective subdivision $774.00 $837.00 Preliminary subdivision $242.00 per acre $262.00 Preliminary planned development2 $2,318.00 minimum for single family $2,508.00 Waiver of subdivision(initial deposit)1 $4,635.00 minimum for commercial/industrial and $5,015.00 townhouses/multiples $7,161.00 maximum $8,076.00 Rezoning(when site plan is involved; $1,159.00 $1,254.00 Site plan review/building permit $1,159.00 $1,254.00 Sketch plan $7-74.00 $837.00 Variance 8774,00 $837.00 NOTES: 1 These are escrow deposits with minimums/maximums;they are not intended to be actual charges. 2 This planned development escrow is not required if it is processed as part of a subdivision application for which and escrow is being collected. s These escrows are not required if a subdivision escrow has been collected as part of the same application. Final Plat $231.00 $250.00 35.29 153.79 Additional fee for each lot over 10 $3.00 Page 16 Description Current Proposed Required by Fees Fees Section Impervious Surface Area(up to 5%increase) $101.00 $113.00 155.350(D) Minor or Corrective Subdivision $258.00 $279.00 153.34 Natural Resources Management Permit: 152.15 Single family $ $211.00 Duplex,townhouse,condo(up to 16 units) $-100 first unit+$34.00 each $179.00+ additional unit $37.00 Condo,apaitments(16 units and greater) $651.00 first 16 units+$13.00 each $708.00+ additional unit $14.00 Commercial,institutional,industrial $550.00 first 10,000 SF of building+ $595.00+ $790 each additional 10,000 SF or $85.00 fraction thereof Natural Resources Management Permit-Excavation: 152.15 Number of Cubic Yards Fee 0-100 $80.00 $87.00 101 to 1,000 S-844IG first 100 CY+$35.00 each $88.00+ additional 100 CY or fraction thereof $38.00 1,001 to 10,000 $380.00 first 1,000 CY+$6 00 per $411.00+ each additional 1,000 CY or fraction $66.00 thereof 10,001 or more $926.00 first 10,000 CY+ $61.00 per $1,001.00+ each additional 10,000 CY or fraction $66.00 thereof Natural Resources Management Permit-Security Escrow: 152.22 Project Type Fee All projects except those identified below $2,000.00 or the amount equal to 125% of the estimated cost to accomplish compliance with the approved natural resources management plan,whichever is greater Projects that disturb an area of less than $250.00 plus an additional$1,000.00 if one acre in size on an individual lot or an"as built"grading plan is required parcel on which a one-family or two- family dwelling exists and will remain to exist under the permit Protective Buffer Zone Sign $25.00 152.57(F) Page 17 Description Current Proposed Required by Fees Fees Section Park Dedication: 153.29 Proportional Park Dedication Calculations: Park dedication requirements shall be based upon the parkland demand created by the use contained within each subdivision as it relates to the generation of person-residents. The amount of parkland required for each person-resident is based on the need for parkland to achieve the park services standard which the City has set through its historic parkland development. The City standard is 0.00955 acre of parkland area needed for each person-resident. Where cash-in-lieu of land is taken,the value of the land shall be based on the benchmark values of raw land that are set by the City Council based on periodic review of market conditions. Present benchmark values are: Single family $75,000.00 per acre Multi-family $220,000.00 per acre Commercial $265,000.00 per acre Industrial $128,000.00 per acre Residential Subdivision Formula: Single Family= 2.75 persons/unit Townhouse=2.2 persons/unit Apartment= 1.9 persons/unit (number of units)x(persons per unit)x(0.00955 acre)=total land area of dedication Example: Single family at 3 units/acre: 3 x 2.75 x 0.00955=0.0788 acre x$75,000=$5,910.00 per acre or Each single family unit=2.75 persons x 0.00955 acre=0.0263 x$75,000=$1,972.50 per unit Example: Townhouse at 6 units/acre: 6 x 2.2 x 0.00955=0.1261 x$220,000=$27,732.20 per acre or Each townhouse unit=2.2 persons x 0.00955=0.0210 x$220,000=$4,620.00 per unit Example: Apartment at 18 units/acre: 18 x 1.9 x 0.00955=0.3266 x$220,000=$71,852.00 per acre or Each apartment unit= 1.9 persons x 0.00955=0.0181 x$220,000=$3,982.00 per unit Page 18 Description Current Proposed Required by Fees Fees Section Commercial Subdivision Formula: Retail/Service=2 employees per 1,000 square feet of building area Office=3 employees per 1,000 square feet of building area Institutional= 1 employee per 1,000 square feet of building area Industrial= 1 employee per 1,000 square feet of building area Commercial/Office/Institutional: 1 employee=0.25 person-resident The fractional person-resident is based upon the more limited park services demanded by an employee(employee ball teams;picnic grounds;civic celebrations;etc.)plus certain park services related to the customer/client that patronizes the business on a per employee basis. The park dedication clause in the subdivision agreement should make it clear that the actual amount of park dedication to be charged will be based on the size of the building(s)to be erected. If land is taken rather than cash,the calculation would presume a single story building on each lot with the maximum%building coverage of the applicable zoning district in which the subdivision is located. Example: (retail/service building square footage/1000)x number of employees per 1,000 sq.ft. =number of employees x 0.25= number of person-equivalents x 0.00955 acres=acreage to be dedicated x$265,000=cash dedication. or 1000/1000 x 2=2 x 0.25=0.5 x 0.0095=0.0048 x$265,000=$1,272.00 per 1,000 sq. ft.of building area. Example: (office building square footage/1000)x number of employees per 1,000 sq.ft.=number of employees x 0.25=number of person-equivalents x 0.00955 acres=acreage to be dedicated x$265,000=cash dedication. or 1000/1000 x 3=3 x 0.25=0.75 x 0.0095=0.0071 x$265,000=$1,881.50 per 1,000 sq.ft.of building area. Example: (institutional building square footage/1000)x number of employees per 1,000 sq.ft.=number of employees x 0.25= number of person-equivalents x 0.00955 acres=acreage to be dedicated x$265,000=cash dedication. or 1000/1000 x 1 = 1 x 0.25=0.25 x 0.0095=0.0024 x$265,000=$636.00 per 1,000 sq.ft.of building area. Page 19 Description Current Proposed Required by Fees Fees Section Industrial: 1 employee=0.1 person-resident The fractional person-resident is based upon the even more limited park services demanded by an industrial employee (employee ball teams,picnic grounds,civic celebrations,etc.) The park dedication clause in the subdivision agreement should make it clear that the actual amount of park dedication to be charged will be based on the size of the building(s)to be erected. If land is taken rather than cash,the calculation would presume a single story building on each lot with the maximum%building coverage of the applicable zoning district in which the subdivision is located. Example: (industrial building square footage/1000)x number of employees per 1,000 sq.ft.=number of employees x 0.1 =number of person-equivalents x 0.00955 acres=acreage to be dedicated x$128,000=cash dedication. or 1000/1000 x 1 = 1 x 0.1 =0.1 x 0.0095=0.001 x$128,000=$128.00 per 1,000 sq. ft.of building area. Preliminary Plat $73 00 $797.00 153.79 Storm Water Ponding Dedication: 153.29 Minimum 5%of platted area less major rights of way(50 foot half right of way or greater) Waiver of Platting $258.00 $279.00 153.76 153.79 Page 20 Description Current Proposed Required by Fees Fees Section UTILITY FEES 153.62(A) Sanitary Sewer Connection Fees: Service Unit Fee Remarks Trunk charge per SAC unit $341.00 $369.00 Lateral benefit from trunk per front foot $3'1.00 Development cost $37.00 Lateral cost project cost project cost Development cost Metro availability cost per SAC/SEF unit Determined by MCES City availability cost per SAC/SEF unit $385.00 development cost $417.00 Storm Sewer Connection Fees: Service Unit Fee Remarks Trunk charge: Single family detached trunk per acre4 $6,691.00 Development cost $7,240.00 Multiple residential trunk per acre4 $8,359.00 Development cost $9,045.00 Commercial/industrial trunk per acre4 $10,011.00 Development cost $10,865.00 Lateral charge project cost project cost Development cost Water Utility Connection Fees: Service Unit Fee Remarks Trunk charge per acre4 $2,988.00 Development cost $3,234.00 Lateral benefit from trunk per front foot $34.00 Development cost $37.00 Lateral charge project cost project cost Development cost Supply and storage per SAC/SEF unit $1,045.00 w/bldg permit $1,131.00 Miscellaneous Charges: Account maintenance fee for change within 30 days of previous $30.00 $35.00 change After hours call-out non-emergency,cost plus 20% of cost 51.39 Clear water discharge surcharges: 51.08 Correction not made-single family $100.00 Correction not made-non-single family $300.00 Inspection not completed-single family $100.00 Inspection not completed-non-single family $300.00 Prohibited reconnection made-single family $300.00 Prohibited reconnection made-non-single family $500.00 Hydrant meter rental: Base charge $725.00 Refundable deposit $500.00 Rental cost $8.00 month Water usage(per 1,000 gallons) $3.00 Meter data transmitter fee-initial non-compliance $100.00 Meter data transmitter installation fee-external $150.00 Page 21 Description Current Proposed Required by Fees Fees Section Meter data transmitter reconnection fee-irrigation $50.00 (plus materials) Meter pricing-cost plus 20% 51.35 Penalty charges for delinquent utility accounts over$5.00: 51.36 Monthly bills(minimum$3.00) 1.5% acct.bal. Quarterly bills(minimum$3.00) 4.5% acct.bal. Service re-connection: 51.39 Deposit for council hearing $55.00 Service restoration fee(effective June 1) $55.00 Special assessment(plus interest as adopted by resolution) $-5-5,00 $60.00 51.36 Testing of meter: 51.37 City test,sizes 5/8",3/4"and 1",cost plus 20% City test,sizes 1-1/2"and 2",cost plus 20% Independent testing,cost plus 20% Water-bulk(per 1,000 gallons) $3.00 Sewer Utility User Fees''8: 51.36 Hydrant-meter-rental- $25.00 6,000 10,000 rate Monthly base charge: All users,except mobile homes and apartments $10.17 $10.67 unit Mobile homes and apartments S9,1-5 $9.60 unit Monthly consumption charges(per 1,000 gallons/unit)5: First 5,000 $3.41 6,000- 10,000 $3:30 $3.46 11,000- 15,000 $3- $3.83 16,000-35,000 $4.64 $4.87 Over 35,000 $538 $5.57 Quarterly base charge: Single family,duplex,and townhomes with individual $30.51 $32.01 unit services or less than 9 units per building Quarterly consumption charges(per 1,000 gallons/unit): First 15,000 $35 $3.41 16,000-30,000 $3-38 $3.46 31,000-45,000 $3 65 $3.83 46,000- 105,000 $1.61 $4.87 Over 105,000 $ 38 $5.57 Page 22 Description Current Proposed Required by Fees Fees Section Storm Water Drainage User Fee8: Monthly residential equivalent fee $9.55 Quarterly residential equivalent fee $26.01 $28.65 Street Light Utility User Fee8: Monthly charges: Apartments/condominiums $1.67 res.unit Commercial in ring route $10.02 $11.02 acre Commercial/industrial outside of ring route 43.a $5.86 acre Mobile homes $1.67 res.unit Townhouse without individual services and 9 or more $1.67 res.unit units per building Quarterly charges: Single family,duplex,and townhouse with individual $6.84 res.unit services or less than 9 units per building Water Utility User Fee8: 51.36 Monthly base charge6: All users,except mobile homes and apartments $7,79 $8.17 unit Mobile homes and apaitiuents $7.35 unit Monthly consumption charges(per 1,000 gallons/unit): First 5,000 $1.69 6,000- 10,000 $4,67 $1.75 11,000- 15,000 $2,07 $2.18 16,000-35,000 $2.73 Over 35,000 $3,08 $3.24 Quarterly base charge6: Single family,duplex,and townhomes with individual $23.37 $24.51 unit services or less than 9 units per building Quarterly consumption charges(per 1,000 gallons/unit): First 15,000 $1.69 16,000-30,000 $1.75 31,000-45,000 S.2,07 $2.18 46,000- 105,000 $2 60 $2.73 Over 105,000 S3 05 $3.24 Page 23 Description Current Proposed Required by Fees Fees Section NOTES: 4 Acreage will be calculated based on platted area less major rights of way(50 foot half right of way or greater.) s Sewer Flow Basis -sewer consumption charges are based on the average 3 metered monthly winter water consumptions or the winter quarter water consumptions,except commercial and institutional are based on water consumption each month. If the residence was not occupied by the current customer during the 3 winter months,the sewer charge will be based on the actual water quantity used up to 6,000 gallons each month until a standard 3 winter months or winter quarter is established. 6 Sewer Prorating Policy-new accounts of less than a full month/quarter due to ownership or occupancy changes shall be prorated based on the charge for the most recent winter water consumption (for accounts being closed)or the charge for actual water quantity used up to 6,000 gallons each month (for new accounts)times the number of days of occupancy in the month and dividing the result by 30. Water Prorating Policy- new accounts of less than a full month/quarter due to ownership or occupancy changes shall have base water charges prorated with consumption charges based on actual quantity used. 8 Rates are effective for all bills mailed after January 12,2022. January 11,2023 Page 24 Description Current Proposed Required by Fees Fees Section ZONING 155.400 Comprehensive Plan Amendment $77'1.00 $837.00 Conditional Use $385.00 $417.00 155.399 Interim Use Permit $695.00 $752.00 155.401 Rezoning Planned Development District $2,062.00 $2,231.00 155.400 Rezoning All Other Districts $737.00 $797.00 155.400 Variances: 153.77& 155.379 155.397 Residential $4-69.00 $183.00 All others 00 $382.00 Page 25 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 2023 FEE SCHEDULE WHEREAS, Chapter 35 of the City Code of Ordinances provides for fees to be established by City Council resolution; and WHEREAS, the City desires to recover certain user-related costs through fees and reimbursement; and WHEREAS, the City has listed the fees and charges for various permits, products, and services in a Fee Schedule identified as Exhibit A. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Apple Valley, Dakota County, Minnesota,that the fees as listed in Exhibit A are hereby approved and shall take effect January 1, 2023. ADOPTED this 8th day of December, 2022. Clint Hooppaw, Mayor ATTEST: Pamela J. Gackstetter, City Clerk Exhibit A City of Apple IIValley ___ 0 ___ Lk Ifflu1 Approved by the Apple Valley City Council at its December 8, 2022, meeting. Fees are effective January 1, 2023. TABLE OF CONTENTS Description Page Cemetery Fees 1 City Fees and Materials 3 Consultant and Engineering Fees 5 Inspections and Permits 6 Licenses and Permits 11 Subdivision and Development Fees 16 Utility Fees 21 Zoning 25 Description Current Fees Required by Section CEMETERY FEES 92.15 Additions 11-15: Resident with marker privileges $1,985.00 Non-resident with marker privileges $3,970.00 Resident with monument privileges $2,685.00 Non-resident with monument privileges $5,370.00 Addition 30: Resident with marker privileges $885.00 Non-resident with marker privileges $1,770.00 Resident with monument privileges $1,490.00 Non-resident with monument privileges $2,980.00 Additions 31-33, 36-38: Resident with marker privileges $1,080.00 Non-resident with marker privileges $2,160.00 Resident with monument privileges $1,690.00 Non-resident with monument privileges $3,380.00 Addition 34/35: Single Boulder Double Boulder Resident Non- Resident Non-resident resident $2,665.00 $5,330.00 $3,085.00 $6,170.00 Page 1 Description Current Fees Required by Section Additions 50/53: Single Niche Double Niche Level Resident Non- Resident Non-resident resident 1 $1,405.00 $2,810.00 $2,300.00 $4,600.00 2 $1,480.00 $2,960.00 $2,450.00 $4,900.00 3 $1,580.00 $3,160.00 $2,595.00 $5,190.00 4 $1,740.00 $3,480.00 $2,880.00 $5,760.00 5 $1,835.00 $3,670.00 $2,940.00 $5,880.00 6 $1,645.00 $3,290.00 _ $2,740.00 $5,480.00 6 Corner $1,645.00 $3,290.00 N/A N/A Administrative Transfer $20.00 per document Columbarium Niche Name Plate (additional or inscription) $440.00 Columbarium Niche Vase $205.00 Cremation Boulder Emblem $230.00 Cremation Boulder Portrait $370.00 Cremation Boulder Scroll(each additional) $500.00 Interment/(Opening) and Disinterment Fees: Columbarium niche(includes memorialization plaque $770.00 and one inscription) Columbarium niche re-open and close $215.00 Cremation boulder(includes 2 scrolls) $920.00 Vault- adult(over four feet) $1,900.00 Vault- child(two feet one-inch to four feet) $1,170.00 Vault- cremation $1,330.00 Vault- infant(under two feet) $840.00 Monuments and Markers Locating Fee $155.00 Outer Cremation Container $170.00 Overtime Fee (for services after 2:00 p.m.) $155.00 per hour Right of Subsequent Burial(second,third, etc.) 50% of current lot cost Title Change Fee (owner deceased) $70.00 per certificate Weekend/Holiday Fee (any activity) $730.00 Page 2 Description Current Fees Required by Section CITY FEES AND MATERIALS Administrative Processing: Assessment charges for deseased tree removal: Administrative fee (in addition to total costs) $60.00 Interest for unpaid amounts levied for collection 8% Assessment terms: Total Costs Years Assessed $1.00 - $699.99 1 $700.00 - $1,399.99 2 $1400.00 - $2,099.99 3 over$2,100.00 4 Nuisance invoice $50.00 Tax-exempt conduit(private activitiy revenue bonds) issuance fee First$10,000,000.00 1% Amounts over$10,000,000.00 0.5% Host City approval(minimum$5,000.00) 0.125% Antenna Site Leases: 1 - 9 antennas (annual) $38,752.00 Each additional antenna or reserve space of antenna(annual) $2,419.00 Annual lease adjustment 3.5% or CPI (whichever is greater or negotiable) Escrow- equipment upgrades/modifications (administration and Actual cost plus 10% plan review, agreement modifications and amendments, engineering and field inspections) Escrow-new installation(engineering and field inspections) Actual cost plus 10% Ground space - 300 sq. ft. Included in lease Ground space -greater than 300 sq. ft. (annual) $3.51 sq. ft. New installation application fee (administration review and $3,034.00 agreement preparation) Small cell application fee (first five sites) $568.00 97.11 each site after first five $114.00 Copies: CD $5.00 DVD's of meetings $25.00 Oversized commercial building plans $5.00 Photocopies $0.25 False Alarm Charges: 130.42 Fourth and each subsequent Fire response in any calendar year $350.00 Page 3 Description Current Fees Required by Section Franchise Fees and Other Fees Charged by Franchise Holders: 119 Cable: Percent of gross revenues 5% 119.28 Cable: PEG fee $.75 mo. 119.27(D)(1) Electric: Percent of gross on each account not to exceed$25.00 per month: Single family residential 2% Multiple family residential 2% Commercial/Industrial 2% Institutional 2% Gas: (None established at this time) 119.52 Maps: Land use $2.50 Street- color(first one to residents/AV businesses no charge) $2.50 Zoning $2.50 Property/Ownership Information from Dakota County PID System $5.00 35.25 (per address) Police&Fire Services: Accident photos (compact disc) $5.00 Audio tape copies of statements(compact disc) $5.00 Dog license owners list $50.00 Finger printing non-resident(2 sets of cards) $20.00 Finger printing resident(2 sets of cards) $10.00 Letters of clear record $10.00 Police and Fire background check for daycare/foster care $6.00 Police extra-duty pay rate (minimum 4-hour charge) $96.00 hour Squad car/body worn camera DVD copies Acutal cost of labor and materials Return Check Charge $30.00 Special Assessment- County Processing $4.60 per parcel Special Assessment Search-Written Copy $25.00 Utility New Customer List-Electronic File $50.00 Zoning Compliance Letter $42.00 155.395 Page 4 Description Current Fees Required by Section CONSULTANT AND ENGINEERING FEES 153.79 City Engineering Design and Contract Administration Fee Table: Construction Cost Fee= % of Construction Cost $0 - $250,000.00 7.20% $250,000.00 - $500,000.00 5.90% $500,000.00 - $750,000.00 5.40% $750,000.00 - $1,000,000.00 5.10% $1,000,000.00 - $2,000,000.00 4.70% City Engineering Hourly Rates: Administrative Specialist $78.00 Assistant City Engineer $164.00 City Engineer $182.00 Civil Engineer $142.00 Engineering/Construction Technician I $95.00 Engineering/Construction Technician II $120.00 Engineering/Construction Technician III $142.00 Engineering Intern $58.00 GIS Technician $110.00 Natural Resources Coordinator $142.00 Natural Resources Technician $96.00 WaterResources Specialist $112.00 Legal Hourly Rates (Dougherty,Molenda, Solfest,Hills &Bauer, P.A.): Development work $271.63 Municipal Attorney $178.13 Municipal Paralegal $111.39 Page 5 Description Current Fees Required by Section INSPECTIONS AND PERMITS Building Permits, Fire Alarm Systems, and Fire Suppression Systems: 150.04 & 93.21 Total Valuation Fee $1.00 to$500.00 $52.00 501.00 to 2,000.00 $52.00 for the first$500.00,plus$3.70 for each additional $100.00 or fraction thereon,to and including$2,000.00 2,001.00 to 25,000.00 $107.50 for the first$2,000.00,plus $17.50 for each additional$1,000.00 or fraction thereof,to and including $25,000.00 25,001.00 to 50,000.00 $510.00 for the first$25,000.00,plus$13.40 for each additional$1,000.00 or fraction thereof,to and including $50,000.00 50,001.00 to 100,000.00 $845.00 for the first$50,000.00,plus$9.15 for each additional$1,000.00 or fraction thereof,to and including $100,000.00 100,001.00 to 500,000.00 $1,302.50 for the first$100,000.00,plus$7.40 for each additional$1,000.00 or fraction thereof,to and including $500,000.00 500,001.00 to 1,000,000.00 $4,262.50 for the first$500,000.00,plus$6.18 for each additional$1,000.00 or fraction thereof,to and including $1,000,000.00 1,000,001.00 and up $7,352.50 for the first$1,000,000.00,plus$4.80 for each additional$1,000.00 or fraction thereof Commercial Flat Rate Permit Fees (plus state surcharge): 150.04 Commercial fireplace $136.96 Commercial flat roof $538.74 Commercial interior demolition $141.00 Commercial pitched roof $186.89 Electrical Permits and Inspections (plus state surcharge): 150.04 Carnival/event(minimum fee) $212.50 Commercial annual maintenance $619.00 Commercial circuit/feeder: 0-200A up to 240V $8.75 each 201-800A up to 240V $16.87 each 0-200A above 240V $21.41 each 201-800A above 240V $41.58 each Page 6 Description Current Fees Required by Section Concrete encased electrode $48.40 Dakota County Saver Switch Program (one address) $20.56 Generator(residential) $48.40 Load switch permit $48.40 Luminaire retrofit modifications $0.40 per fixture Manufactured home $48.40 New one or two family dwelling: Maximum of 400 ampere and 0-30 circuits $194.85 31 or more circuits $8.75 each New multi-family structures: Up to 20 circuits (max of 3 trips) $114.64 per unit Permit fee and/or trip charge (minimum): 1 trip charge (ex: final inspection only) $48.40 2 trip charge (ex: rough in and final inspection) $96.80 3 trip charge (ex: rough in, in floor heat, final inspection) $145.20 Reattachment of exterior electrical components: Commercial buildings (hotels,motels, apartments, and $48.40 each businesses) Residential buildings (single family homes) $48.40 each Multiple units for townhomes, duplexes, and condominiums: First unit $48.40 Each unit thereafter $27.16 Recreational vehicle site $48.40 Replacement load switch permit $20.56 Separate bonding/grounding inspection $48.40 Service upgrade (1 trip up to 30 circuits) $113.96 Service upgrade (each additional circuit over 30) $8.75 Service upgrade with remodel (up to 3 trips and up to 30 circuits) $193.71 Solar PV Installation: 0-5,000 watts $106.69 5,001-10,000 watts $177.69 10,001-20,000 watts $265.97 20,001-30,000 watts $354.24 30,001-40,000 watts $442.45 40,001-1,000,000 watts $442.45 Each additional 10,000 watts over 40,000 $42.94 1,000,001-5,000,000 watts $4,693.18 Each additional 10,000 watts over 1,000,000 $28.75 5,000,001 watts and larger $12,763.75 Each additional 10,000 watts over 5,000,000 $17.21 Street,parking lot, outdoor lighting, and traffic standard $7.10 each Swimming pools (commercial and residential) $96.80 Page 7 Description Current Fees Required by Section Tech circuits - alarm communication,remote control, $1.26 and signal circuit(0-50 volts) Transformers for light,heat, and power: Up to 10 KVA $20.62 each 11 KVA or more $41.30 each Fire Flat Rate Permit Fee - Contract Valuation Multiplies by(plus state surcharge) $0.0163 Heating,Ventilation,Air Conditioning(HVAC), and Refrigeration Permits 150.04 and Inspections (plus state surcharge): New construction residential fees (built to IRC): Air conditioner $136.96 Fireplace $136.96 Furnace only $136.96 1 furnace and 1 A/C $136.96 More than 1 furnace and/or A/C $191.44 Existing residential (gas lines,bath fans,AC, etc.) (minimum) $76.80 New or existing commercial fees (built to IBC)valuation multiplies by $0.0163 (minimum$85.20) State surcharge -permit fee multiplies by $0.0005 (minimum as determined by state - $1.00) Other Inspections and Fees (plus state surcharge): Avolve application fees for down payment(non-refundable): Fire/building/plumbing/mechanical/NRMP 25% of permit fee Electrical $56.81 Health-licensing inspections (minimum 1/2 hour charge) $76.80 per hour Investigation fee for work without a permit(not to exceed permit fee) $76.80 per hour Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated $76.80 per hour (minimum 1/2 hour charge) Inspections outside of normal business hours $105.55 per hour Move overweight structure $136.96 Outdoor seating $76.80 per trip Re-inspection fee: First re-inspection $38.97 Each inspection thereafter $77.94 Reissuance of certificate of occupancy inspection (minimum '/z hour) $76.80 per hour charge) Special inspection fee $105.55 per trip Page 8 Description Current Fees Required by Section Plan Review Fee: 150.04 Additional plan review required by changes, additions, or $76.80 per hour revisions to approved plans (minimum 1/2 hour charge) Building permit plan review 65% of permit fee Commercial electrical plan review $100.38 per hour Commercial and residential septic plan review $100.38 per hour (minimum 1/2 hour charge) Fire permit/fire sprinkler, suppression, and alarm plan review 65% of permit fee 150.01/93.21 Plan review fee for similar plans previously reviewed 25% of permit fee Pre-plan review fee (no existing permit) $76.80 per hour (minimum 1/2 hour charge) Plumbing Permits& Inspections (plus state surcharge): 150.04 Plumbing installations: Commercial fee(built to IBC)valuation multiplies by $0.0163 (minimum$85.20) Residential fee(built to IRC)per plumbing fixture $14.49 (minimum$76.80) Residential fee up to 2 valve replacements $29.88 (water meter replacement program only) Backflow prevention(commercial and residential) $76.80 Water heater or water softener $76.80 Public Right of Way Excavation(driveway) $79.00 96.06 Public Right of Way Obstruction Permit $199.00 97.05(A) Public Right of Way Management Permit: Excavation permit(up to 100 linear feet) $216.00 97.05 For every 1 linear foot in excess of 100 linear feet $0.26 Obstruction permit $73.00 97.05 Registration fee $55.00 97.04 Residential Flat Rate Permit Fees (plus state surcharge): Attic insulation(existing home) $140.93 Chimney repair $143.38 Deck $186.89 Deck repair $140.93 Demolition(whole or interior) $140.93 Drain tile(exterior) $186.89 Page 9 Description Current Fees Required by Section Fence (seven feet or higher) $140.93 Mobile home installation $208.64 Retaining wall over four feet high $186.89 Retaining wall over eight feet high $232.67 Roofing -re-roof single family home $186.89 Roofing-multi-family attached homes (minimum 2 $86.06 per unit attached units) Roofing repair(one plane) $140.93 Siding $186.89 Siding-multi-family attached homes(minimum 2 attached units) $86.06 per unit Siding repair(one plane) $140.93 Swimming pool(in or above ground) $140.93 Window replacement(all changes and installs) $140.93 Windows,roofing, and siding combination of two (one $288.57 residential home) Service Connection Inspection(plus state surcharge): 150.04 Combination sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and water $76.80 Sanitary sewer $76.80 Storm sewer $76.80 Water $76.80 State Surcharge Determined by state 150.04 Subsurface Sewage Treatment System(plus state surcharge) 51.58 Demo or removal $94.01 New installation $590.37 Repair or upgrade $94.01 Vacation of Public Easements $196.00 153.79 Application escrow $562.00 Application fee $212.00 Page 10 Description Current Fees Required by Section LICENSES AND PERMITS Adult Uses: Adult establishments $5,250.00 110.19 Adult accessory use-high impact $2,000.00 110.19 Investigation fee $1,500.00 110.19 Change in corporation,partnership, or association $500.00 110.24 Amendment to license $77.00 110.25 Alcoholic Beverages: 3.2 percent malt liquor: 111.22(A) Off-sale $200.00 On-sale $500.00 On-sale temporary(up to 10 days) $50.00 Application fee $250.00 111.25(A) Consumption and display of intoxicating liquor: 111.51 Private club $300.00 Public place $300.00 Temporary(1 day) $25.00 Intoxicating and concessionaire liquor: Off-sale $200.00 111.42 On-sale: liquor sales under$275,000.00 $5,300.00 liquor sales $275,001.00 to $700,000.00 $6,700.00 liquor sales over$700,000.00 $8,000.00 On-sale club: under 200 members $300.00 201 to 500 members $500.00 501 to 1000 members $650.00 1001 to 2000 members $800.00 2001 to 4000 members $1,000.00 4001 to 6000 members $2,000.00 over 6000 members $3,000.00 On-sale cocktail room $600.00 111.42 On-sale Sunday $200.00 On-sale temporary liquor(1 to 4 days) $50.00 111.38 Application fee $500.00 111.25 Page 11 Description Current Fees Required by Section Malt liquor: Off-sale $200.00 111.41 Off-sale Sunday $50.00 On-sale brewer taproom $600.00 111.40 On-sale Sunday $200.00 Application fee $500.00 111.25 Wine: 111.22(A) On-sale $1,500.00 Application fee $500.00 Additional investigation/application fees: 11.25(A) Amendment to license $100.00 Change in club director, officer, or committee member $120.00 Change in officer $120.00 Change in operating manager $120.00 Change in ownership or control $120.00 Civil penalty: 111.37 First violation $500.00 Second violation within 24 months $750.00 Third violation with in 24 months $1,500.00 Fourth violation with in 24 months Determined by City Council Annual Residential Parking Permit: $30.00 155.373 Cats: Animal pickup $30.00 Boarding fee $20.00 per day Cremation/disposal of animal $30.00 Quarantine boarding for cats $20.00 per day Euthanasia of animal $25.00 Catteries: 91.05 Origination fee $82.00 Annual fee $78.00 Christmas Tree Sale Lots: 114.21 License $115.00 Clean up deposit $200.00 Page 12 Description Current Fees Required by Section Dogs: 2-year licenses: 91.15 Male or female $20.00 Duplicated tag $5.00 Animal pickup $30.00 Boarding fee $30.00 per day Cremation/disposal of animal $40.00 Euthanasia of animal $30.00 Non-refundable hearing fee $250.00 91.20(C)(1) Quarantine boarding for dogs $30.00 per day Dangerous dog registration: 91.20 Annual fee $75.00 Registration tag $5.00 Warning symbol sign $14.00 Hobby kennels: 91.05 Origination fee $82.00 Annual fee $78.00 Extractions/Commercial Sand and Gravel: 150.15(A) Initial application fee $4,450.00 Annual fee $11,652.00 Escrow deposit $12,362.00 Fireworks - Consumer Sales: 120.03 Indoor retail sales $100.00 Outdoor retail sales $350.00 Fuel Dispensing Facility(per fueling position) $75.00 116.02(A) Gambling License Investigation Fee $250.00 112.35 Garbage and Refuse Collections: 50.04 First truck $190.00 Each additional truck $70.00 Page 13 Description Current Fees Required by Section Manufactured Home Park: 151.04(A) Application fee $220.00 Annual inspection fee $55.00 151.06 Additional inspection fee for parks with over 25 $2.00 ea. lot occupied lots Final permit fee $7.00 ea. lot Massage Therapy Business: 123.03(B) Application fee $300.00 Initial investigation fee $300.00 Additional investigation/application fees: Change in owner/officer $125.00 Change in on-site manager $125.00 Amendment to license $80.00 Massage Therapist: 123.03(B) New application fee $120.00 Renewal application fee $86.00 Outdoor Promotion Permit $5.00 Pawnbroker or Pawnbroker and Precious Metal Dealer: 117.07 Annual license fee $8,800.00 Deposit on investigation $2,500.00 Amendment to license $500.00 New operating officer investigation $125.00 Transaction records fee $2.00 per record Reporting failure fee $160.00 day Photograph failure fee $160.00 day Peddlers and Solicitors: 114.03 Annual(per person) $145.00 Temporary(per person) $90.00 Precious Metal Dealers Only: 117.07(A) Annual license fee: 50 or fewer transactions $250.00 More than 50 transactions $500.00 Deposit on investigation fee $500.00 Amendment to license $80.00 New operating officer investigation $125.00 Page 14 Description Current Fees Required by Section Transaction records fee $2.00 per record Reporting failure fee $160.00 day Photograph failure fee $160.00 day Signage: 154.04 Business signs $209.00 Additional fee for business signs over 40 sq. ft. $1.00 per sq. ft. Handling fee for removal from right-of-way $15.00 Monument signs $2,009.00 Re-face existing sign $5.00 Temporary sign permit $5.00 Variance $315.00 Special Event Permit: Permit application fee 100-500 participants $50.00 Over 500 participants $100.00 Tobacco or Tobacco Products (2-year license) $510.00 115.03 Civil penalty: 111.37 First violation $300.00 Second violation within 24 months $600.00 Third and subsequent violation(s)within 24 months $1,000.00 Tree Work $55.00 152.43 Page 15 Description Current Fees Required by Section SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT FEES Commercial, Industrial, Public and Multiple Residential Site Plan Review: $281.00 155.404 Escrow Fees: 153.79 & 155.404 Application Escrow Amount Comprehensive Plan amendment3 $1,254.00 Conditional Use Permit3 $1,254.00 Final planned development3 $3,479.00 for initial deposit Final plat $837.00 Final subdivision application' $2,244.00 for 1 to 3 lots- initial deposit $6,685.00 for 4 or more lots - initial deposit Impervious surface area(up to 5% $560.00 increase) Interim Use Permit(when site plan is $871.00 involved)3 Minor/corrective subdivision $837.00 Preliminary subdivision $262.00 per acre Preliminary planned development2 $2,508.00 minimum for single family Waiver of subdivision(initial deposit)' $5,015.00 minimum for commercial/industrial and townhouses/multiples $8,076.00 maximum Rezoning(when site plan is involved)3 $1,254.00 Site plan review/building permit $1,254.00 Sketch plan $837.00 Variance $837.00 NOTES: ' These are escrow deposits with minimums/maximums;they are not intended to be actual charges. 2 This planned development escrow is not required if it is processed as part of a subdivision application for which and escrow is being collected. ' These escrows are not required if a subdivision escrow has been collected as part of the same application. Page 16 Description Current Fees Required by Section Final Plat $250.00 153.79 Additional fee for each lot over 10 $3.00 Impervious Surface Area(up to 5% increase) $113.00 155.350(D) Minor or Corrective Subdivision $279.00 153.34 Natural Resources Management Permit: 152.15 Single family $211.00 Duplex,townhouse, condo (up to 16 units) $179.00 first unit+$37.00 each additional unit Condo, apartments(16 units and greater) $708.00 first 16 units+ $14.00 each additional unit Commercial,institutional, industrial $595.00 first 10,000 SF of building+ $85.00 each additional 10,000 SF or fraction thereof Natural Resources Management Permit-Excavation: 152.15 Number of Cubic Yards Fee 0-100 $87.00 101 to 1,000 $88.00 first 100 CY+ $38.00 each additional 100 CY or fraction thereof 1,001 to 10,000 $411.00 first 1,000 CY+ $66.00 per each additional 1,000 CY or fraction thereof 10,001 or more $1,001.00 first 10,000 CY+ $66.00 per each additional 10,000 CY or fraction thereof Natural Resources Management Permit- Security Escrow: 152.22 Project Type Fee All projects except those identified below $2,000.00 or the amount equal to 125%of the estimated cost to accomplish compliance with the approved natural resources management plan,whichever is greater Projects that disturb an area of less than $250.00 plus an additional $1,000.00 if an one acre in size on an individual lot or "as built" grading plan is required parcel on which a one-family or two- family dwelling exists and will remain to exist under the permit Protective Buffer Zone Sign $25.00 152.57 (F) Page 17 Description Current Fees Required by Section Park Dedication: 153.29 Proportional Park Dedication Calculations: Park dedication requirements shall be based upon the parkland demand created by the use contained within each subdivision as it relates to the generation of person-residents. The amount of parkland required for each person- resident is based on the need for parkland to achieve the park services standard which the City has set through its historic parkland development. The City standard is 0.00955 acre of parkland area needed for each person- resident. Where cash-in-lieu of land is taken,the value of the land shall be based on the benchmark values of raw land that are set by the City Council based on periodic review of market conditions. Present benchmark values are: Single family $75,000.00 per acre Multi-family $220,000.00 per acre Commercial $265,000.00 per acre Industrial $128,000.00 per acre Residential Subdivision Formula: Single Family= 2.75 persons/unit Townhouse=2.2 persons/unit Apartment= 1.9 persons/unit (number of units)x(persons per unit)x(0.00955 acre)=total land area of dedication Example: Single family at 3 units/acre: 3 x 2.75 x 0.00955 =0.0788 acre x $75,000= $5,910.00 per acre or Each single family unit=2.75 persons x 0.00955 acre= 0.0263 x $75,000=$1,972.50 per unit Example: Townhouse at 6 units/acre: 6 x 2.2 x 0.00955 = 0.1261 x $220,000 = $27,732.20 per acre or Each townhouse unit=2.2 persons x 0.00955 = 0.0210 x $220,000 =$4,620.00 per unit Example: Apartment at 18 units/acre: 18 x 1.9 x 0.00955 =0.3266 x$220,000= $71,852.00 per acre or Each apartment unit= 1.9 persons x 0.00955 =0.0181 x$220,000= $3,982.00 per unit Page 18 Description Current Fees Required by Section Commercial Subdivision Formula: Retail/Service=2 employees per 1,000 square feet of building area Office= 3 employees per 1,000 square feet of building area Institutional= 1 employee per 1,000 square feet of building area Industrial= 1 employee per 1,000 square feet of building area Commercial/Office/Institutional: 1 employee=0.25 person-resident The fractional person-resident is based upon the more limited park services demanded by an employee (employee ball teams;picnic grounds; civic celebrations; etc.)plus certain park services related to the customer/client that patronizes the business on a per employee basis. The park dedication clause in the subdivision agreement should make it clear that the actual amount of park dedication to be charged will be based on the size of the building(s)to be erected. If land is taken rather than cash,the calculation would presume a single story building on each lot with the maximum%building coverage of the applicable zoning district in which the subdivision is located. Example: (retail/service building square footage/1000)x number of employees per 1,000 sq. ft. =number of employees x 0.25 =number of person-equivalents x 0.00955 acres=acreage to be dedicated x$265,000=cash dedication. or 1000/1000 x 2=2 x 0.25 =0.5 x 0.0095 =0.0048 x$265,000= $1,272.00 per 1,000 sq. ft. of building area. Example: (office building square footage/1000)x number of employees per 1,000 sq. ft. =number of employees x 0.25 = number of person-equivalents x 0.00955 acres=acreage to be dedicated x$265,000=cash dedication. or 1000/1000 x 3 =3 x 0.25 =0.75 x 0.0095 =0.0071 x$265,000= $1,881.50 per 1,000 sq. ft. of building area. Example: (institutional building square footage/1000)x number of employees per 1,000 sq. ft. =number of employees x 0.25 =number of person-equivalents x 0.00955 acres=acreage to be dedicated x$265,000=cash dedication. or 1000/1000 x 1 = 1 x 0.25 =0.25 x 0.0095 =0.0024 x$265,000= $636.00 per 1,000 sq. ft. of building area. Page 19 Description Current Fees Required by Section Industrial: 1 employee=0.1 person-resident The fractional person-resident is based upon the even more limited park services demanded by an industrial employee(employee ball teams,picnic grounds, civic celebrations, etc.) The park dedication clause in the subdivision agreement should make it clear that the actual amount of park dedication to be charged will be based on the size of the building(s)to be erected. If land is taken rather than cash,the calculation would presume a single story building on each lot with the maximum%building coverage of the applicable zoning district in which the subdivision is located. Example: (industrial building square footage/1000)x number of employees per 1,000 sq. ft. =number of employees x 0.1 =number of person-equivalents x 0.00955 acres=acreage to be dedicated x$128,000=cash dedication. or 1000/1000 x 1 = 1 x 0.1 =0.1 x 0.0095 =0.001 x $128,000= $128.00 per 1,000 sq. ft. of building area. Preliminary Plat $797.00 153.79 Storm Water Ponding Dedication: 153.29 Minimum 5% of platted area less major rights of way(50 foot half right of way or greater) Waiver of Platting $279.00 153.79 Page 20 Description Current Fees Required by Section UTILITY FEES 153.62(A) Sanitary Sewer Connection Fees: Service Unit Fee Remarks Trunk charge per SAC unit $369.00 Lateral benefit from trunk per front foot $37.00 Development cost Lateral cost project cost project cost Development cost Metro availability cost per SAC/SEF unit Determined by MCES City availability cost per SAC/SEF unit $417.00 development cost Storm Sewer Connection Fees: Service Unit Fee Remarks Trunk charge: Single family detached trunk per acre4 $7,240.00 Development cost Multiple residential trunk per acre4 $9,045.00 Development cost Commercial/industrial trunk per acre4 $10,865.00 Development cost Lateral charge project cost project cost Development cost Water Utility Connection Fees: Service Unit Fee Remarks Trunk charge per acre4 $3,234.00 Development cost Lateral benefit from trunk per front foot $37.00 Development cost Lateral charge project cost project cost Development cost Supply and storage per SAC/SEF unit $1,131.00 w/bldg permit Miscellaneous Charges: Account maintenance fee for change within 30 days of previous $35.00 change After hours call-out non-emergency, cost plus 20% 51.39 Clear water discharge surcharges: 51.08 Correction not made - single family $100.00 Correction not made -non-single family $300.00 Inspection not completed- single family $100.00 Inspection not completed-non-single family $300.00 Prohibited reconnection made- single family $300.00 Prohibited reconnection made-non-single family $500.00 Page 21 Description Current Fees Required by Section Hydrant meter rental: Base charge $725.00 Refundable deposit $500.00 Rental cost $8.00 month Water usage (per 1,000 gallons) $3.00 Meter data transmitter fee - initial non-compliance $100.00 Meter data transmitter installation fee - external $150.00 Meter data transmitter reconnection fee - irrigation $50.00 (plus materials) Meter pricing- cost plus 20% 51.35 Penalty charges for delinquent utility accounts over$5.00: 51.36 Monthly bills (minimum$3.00) 1.5% acct. bal. Quarterly bills (minimum$3.00) 4.5% acct. bal. Service re-connection: 51.39 Deposit for council hearing $55.00 Service restoration fee (effective June 1) $55.00 Special assessment(plus interest as adopted by resolution) $60.00 51.36 Testing of meter: 51.37 City test, sizes 5/8", 3/4" and 1", cost plus 20% City test, sizes 1-1/2" and 2", cost plus 20% Independent testing , cost plus 20% Water-bulk(per 1,000 gallons) $3.00 Sewer Utility User Fees7'8: 51.36 Monthly base charge: All users, except mobile homes and apartments $10.67 unit Mobile homes and apartments $9.60 unit Monthly consumption charges (per 1,000 gallons/unit)5: First 5,000 $3.41 6,000- 10,000 $3.46 11,000 - 15,000 $3.83 16,000 - 35,000 $4.87 Over 35,000 $5.57 Quarterly base charge: Single family, duplex, and townhomes with individual $32.01 unit services or less than 9 units per building Quarterly consumption charges (per 1,000 gallons/unit): First 15,000 $3.41 16,000 - 30,000 $3.46 31,000 -45,000 $3.83 Page 22 Description Current Fees Required by Section 46,000 - 105,000 $4.87 Over 105,000 $5.57 Storm Water Drainage User Fee8: Monthly residential equivalent fee $9.55 Quarterly residential equivalent fee $28.65 Street Light Utility User Fee8: Monthly charges: Apartments/condominiums $1.67 res. unit Commercial in ring route $11.02 acre Commercial/industrial outside of ring route $5.86 acre Mobile homes $1.67 res. unit Townhouse without individual services and 9 or more $1.67 res. unit units per building Quarterly charges: Single family, duplex, and townhouse with individual $6.84 res. unit services or less than 9 units per building Water Utility User Fee8: 51.36 Monthly base charge6: All users, except mobile homes and apartments $8.17 unit Mobile homes and apartments $7.35 unit Monthly consumption charges (per 1,000 gallons/unit): First 5,000 $1.69 6,000- 10,000 $1.75 11,000 - 15,000 $2.18 16,000 - 35,000 $2.73 Over 35,000 $3.24 Quarterly base charge6: Single family, duplex, and townhomes with individual $24.51 unit services or less than 9 units per building Quarterly consumption charges (per 1,000 gallons/unit): First 15,000 $1.69 16,000 - 30,000 $1.75 31,000 -45,000 $2.18 46,000 - 105,000 $2.73 Over 105,000 $3.24 Page 23 Description Current Fees Required by Section NOTES: 4 Acreage will be calculated based on platted area less major rights of way(50 foot half right of way or greater.) s Sewer Flow Basis - sewer consumption charges are based on the average 3 metered monthly winter water consumptions or the winter quarter water consumptions, except commercial and institutional are based on water consumption each month. If the residence was not occupied by the current customer during the 3 winter months,the sewer charge will be based on the actual water quantity used up to 6,000 gallons each month until a standard 3 winter months or winter quarter is established. 6 Sewer Prorating Policy-new accounts of less than a full month/quarter due to ownership or occupancy changes shall be prorated based on the charge for the most recent winter water consumption (for accounts being closed) or the charge for actual water quantity used up to 6,000 gallons each month (for new accounts)times the number of days of occupancy in the month and dividing the result by 30. Water Prorating Policy- new accounts of less than a full month/quarter due to ownership or occupancy changes shall have base water charges prorated with consumption charges based on actual quantity used. 8 Rates are effective for all bills mailed after January 11, 2023. Page 24 Description Current Fees Required by Section ZONING 155.400 Comprehensive Plan Amendment $837.00 Conditional Use $417.00 155.399 Interim Use Permit $752.00 155.401 Rezoning Planned Development District $2,231.00 155.400 Rezoning All Other Districts $797.00 155.400 Variances: 153.77 & 155.397 Residential $183.00 All others $382.00 Page 25 • ITEM: 7. ..... :�. Apple COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 8, 2022 Valley SECTION: Calendar of Upcoming Events Description: Approve Calendar of Upcoming Events Staff Contact: Department/ Division: Stephanie Marschall, Deputy City Clerk City Clerk's Office ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the calendar of upcoming events as listed in the summary below, and noting each event listed is hereby deemed a Special Meeting of the City Council. SUMMARY: Day/Date Time Location Event Tue./Dec. 6 4:00 p.m. Risor of Apple Grand Opening Ceremony Valley Bogart's Wed./Dec. 7 11:00 a.m -1:30 Entertainment Chamber Luncheon p.m. Center Wed./Dec. 7 7:00 p.m. Municipal Center Planning Commission Meeting Thur./Dec. 8 10:30 a.m. Infinity Day Spa Ribbon Cutting Ceremony Thur./Dec. 8 5:30 p.m. Municipal Center Informal City Council Meeting Thur./Dec. 8 7:00 p.m. Municipal Center Regular City Council Meeting Tue./Dec. 13 11:00 a.m.-1:15 Senior Center Apple Valley Seniors Holiday p.m. Party Wed./Dec. 21 9:00 a.m. Municipal Center Firefighters Relief Association Board Meeting Wed./Dec. 21 7:00 p.m. Municipal Center Planning Commission Meeting Thur./Dec. 22 6:00 p.m. Municipal Center EDA Meeting Thur./Dec. 22 7:00 p.m. Municipal Center Regular City Council Meeting Fri./Dec. 23 City Offices Closed Christmas Holiday Floater Mon./Dec. 26 City Offices Closed Christmas Holiday Observed BACKGROUND: Each event is hereby deemed a Special Meeting of the City Council, the purpose being informational or social gathering. Only events marked with an asterisk (*) will any action of the Council take place. BUDGET IMPACT: N/A • ITEM: 8.A. ..... :�. Appleil COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 8, 2022 Valley SECTION: Closed Session Description: Convene in Closed Session, Under Exception to Open Meeting Law, to Develop or Consider Offers or Counteroffers for the Possible Purchase of Real Property Identified as Parcel ID Number 01-47900-01-010 Staff Contact: Department/ Division: Tom Lawell, City Administrator Administration Department ACTION REQUESTED: Convene in closed session, under exception to Open Meeting Law, to develop or consider offers or counteroffers for the possible purchase of real property identified as Parcel ID Number 01-47900-01-010. SUMMARY: The City of Apple Valley has been exploring the possible purchase of land to accommodate the City's long-term facility needs involving Parcel ID Number 01-47900-01-010, which is located immediately south of the City's Central Maintenance Facility. Minnesota Statutes §13D.05, Subd. 3(c) provides that the City Council may meet in closed session: 1) to determine the asking price for real or personal property to be sold by the government entity 2) to review confidential or protected nonpublic appraisal data under section 13.44, subd. 3 3) to develop or consider offers or counteroffers for the purchase or sale of real or personal property. Staff requests that the City Council meet in closed session on December 8, 2022, to develop or consider offers or counteroffers for the purchase or sale of real or personal property as outlined in Minnesota Statutes §13D.05, Subd. 3(c). BACKGROUND: N/A BUDGET IMPACT: N/A