Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/17/1981 • CITY OF APPLE V � ALLEY PARK COMMITTEE MINUTES - FEBRUARY 17, 1981 PRESENT: Dahlen, Naegeli, Gutenkauf, Holienbeck . ABSENT: Sterling, Miller. l . Call to order. Vice-Chairperson Naegeli called meeting to order at 7: 03 p.m. 2 . Approval of minutes from FebruarY �� 1981 meetin�. Nfs . Hollenbeck stated a correction to minutes, page 8, seeond paragraph, last line should read "the other three first Town Board Members ; Natwick, Ulrich, and Thorberg, rather than Council Members as stated. Minutes were approved as corrected. 3 . Park Committee discussion of future work priorities . Mr. Naegeli stated with the grant money and the match by the City there was $62,000 for improvement of Alimagnet Park. He said the work was pretty much done with the exception c�f ciean- ing up some trees from the storms last summe r. He felt the Committee should take a journey at one of the meetings to take a look at it since this was done with the first funds, and the first time a consultant was hired. As far as the rest of the parks go there are a few paths left to be done . He stated that Mr. Bassett had received a call from a gentlemen who lives in Palimino asking if there would be some playground equipment in Heritage Park. Ms . Gutenkauf stated it might be a good idea, but the land is so low if there is rain it was pretty wet. Mr. Idaegeli stated there was a littie more land there than it looks like because it slopes off to the southeast . He said �the gentlemen said that people think r�ostly c�f there being older people in the area but that there were a lot of children. Mr. Naegeli stated this might be so�ething the Committee would want to think about if there is some money to spare after making sure the projeets presently underway are all completed. He added that the gentle- man would like to come to a meeting to visit with the Committee , Ms. Gutenkauf stated there might be a shortage of open area, depending on what happens with Chaparral, so the Committee should look at it. She stated there was probably 2,50 homes back in the area. Mr. Naegeli stated when the gentlemen comes to the meeting they could look at it to see if the demand was there . Ms . Hollenbeck cheeked the elassification as NPP, and stated that if that was what the Committes had classified it she felt that was what it should be . Mr. Naegeli said they would have to first look at the size, what could be done in the way of grading, and the costs . Also, the bond issue would need to be checked to see if this was a part of i-t. He stated bond issue money cannot be used for repair, and when the bond issue was passed it had to be shown that we were allotting a certain Park Committee M' utes • February 17, 198� Page 2 amount for one park and amount close to that at another, He said that some of the play area in the east and west side are not being used. He said it was nice the gentleman �anted ta come in and visit and Mr. Bassett would set it up. Ms . Hollenbeck stated people came in when they wan�ed the BNiX, and that there had been a lot of coverage when this was set up. �Ir. Naegeli stated it had b�en very successful and in looking a future priorities he thought it might be worthwhile_ �o give some thought to a permanent type facility. Mr. Naegeli announced that Barbara Savanick was appointed as Park Liaison by City Council . Mr. Naegeli stated the County Board was having a meeting this date . Nir. Rollins is asking for a rezoning of his property up by the golf course, and the City Council was writing a letter to the Dakota County Board hoping it will be zoned park and the County will buy it. The County has had appraisals on the pro- perty. Ms . Hollenbeck asked if it was thought the County would buy the land, and Mr. Naegeli stated he doubted it, that it really stemmed back to the City because while little three to five acre tracks were being picked up that land was up there and it wasn't bought. 4. Committee update for new member. Mr. Dahlen stated he had met with Mr. Bassett, and was in the proc�ss of going through old minutes and the bond issue. l�r. Naegeli gave the history by stating the City h.ad had a Park Committee some years ago but i� had become i,nactive . In 1975 the Council decided they wanted to pass another bond issue be- cause they were getting more parks so the y reappainted s��en Members to the Park Committee who met once a month. He said they had had a hard time raising a quorum and didn't get going beeause they didn't have any direction. He said they then lost a couple of Members and he had been appointed as one of them. He said the Committee started to take off in the fall of 1976, established meeting on a twice a month basis , went through a concept plan for what parks there were and the ones they didn't have a plan for they had drawn up a plan so there was a concept plan for every park on what they wanted to do . In the meantime, he said, they were involved in the Alimagnet Park and in the spring of 1977 the Committee was ready to go with a bond issue which was presented to the Couneil . He said the school bond issue had just failed, and the Council turned down the Committee•s request for a bond issus because they felt the school bond might come back and they didn't want a conflict. The Council then 5aid the Committee could go with the issue in the fall at which time the school bond was coming back. During this same time, he said, there was a conflict because people from Alima.gnet wanted land purchased that abutted Alimagnet even though there was going to be a park dedieation of 40 acres . He said the people put enough pressure Park Committee �' utes February 17, 198� � Page 3 on the Council and they voted to purchase another 10 acres in conjunetion with the dedication for $60,000 in the spring of 19?'� , He stated the Committee then regrouped, and cut out the restoration at Alimagnet and another building that was planned to eome up with the $6��0�0. He stated that the people from Alimagnet would come t�a the Park l�eetings and verbally threaten the Members that �hey would be put off the Committee and that the bond issue or anything ei�e _would ever pass if they didn't purchase this land. The Couneil then �old the Committee they had to put it in. In the spring of 1977, the Committee contacted 35 serviee organizations because the bond issue was coming up i� Sept- ember, he said, and the Committee had three to four meetings and also split into groups holding meetings at schools as well as distributing pamphlets . The bond issue Iost around 60/�0. He went on to say the Committee was disturbed about losing the bond issue, and they had also lost four memb�rs in July and August and had gone into the bond issue wi�h two or three people who really hadn't been working on it. Mr. Naegeli stated they again regrouped and the consensus of opinion was that there would be new parks, old parks, and the athletic complex. He stated the Committee really worked hard on it going door to door to every house in Apple Valley, the shopping centers, and formed a non-profi� coropration to be able to buy the supplies because there wasn'� any money. He stated the athletic complex failed misera°bly, but it was the only one that was lost. He said it was thought that the strong athletic vote would bring the improvements to the parks . Ms . Hollenbeck stated that it was thought probable that it would end up with just the athletic complex. Nir. Naegeli went on to say that the bond issue pas�ed: in the spring of 1979 at 1 .2 million dollars which was the biggest bond issue in the seven county area to pass . From then on, it was to decide where the Committee wanted to go and to start doing things with the money. He said the task then was �o decide how -to , tackle this ba.g ari operation. He stated �r. Bassett picked a con- sultant and he was hired at $70,�00 who dr�v� .�p all ne�v plansi � which were reall,y a copy of the plans the Gommittee had drawn up before . He said they were then all set to go in the fall of 1979 when the Council said no because they hadn't sold the bonds yet, and they had decided to hold them because of the firehouse bonds and the public works bonds . He stated the market dropped then, and they couldn'� se7,1, and the Park Committee couldn't do any construction. He said they finally got the bonds sold a year ago in January, and the only money spent to this point was to the consultant. He stated they had gone through books with the consultant who sug�ested the rop� type swings, etc . , and bids were put out for play gro�nd equipment only to find out that the cost was over $10�,000 more than the candy striped equipment could be purehased and all agreed to go with �the candy striped equipment. Mr. Naegeli went on to say that they then got into building cvntracts with the original thought being an earth shelter type building dug in the hill at an estimate of $40,QOO. However, Park Committee M' utes February 1�, 198� � Page � When the consultant finished the plans, he said, th� total was around $$0 to $90,000. , sa the Cominittee decided on a plain old frame structure tha�t could be built for the $�0�000, with a change in the type of siding. He said they had run into some extra costs like the water pro- blem at Hagemeister which ran b�tween $2 and $4,000 but were told it had to be done. He said drinking fo�.ntains have been placed a-� all the teMnis courts . This,he said, would more or less bring the Committee up to the present time . N�r. Naegeli went on to say that Mr. Bassett was going to bring in a complete financial report but he felt moneywise they were in pretty good shape . 5. �ther I tems . Ms . Guter�.kauf stated that she had seen two people driving on the new path in Chaparral Park and Y�ad called City Ha11 to report the ineidents . She said they were no kids, in fact they were quite o�d gentlemen. Later she said she saw two more people do the same thing. l�r. Naegeli asked how they got across the dirt gulley at the end of tY�e trail . Ms . Hollenbeck stated barricades should be put up. Mr. Naegeli stated a note should be made to �i�. Bassett repor�ing the incidents . Ms . Gutenkauf stated they had to have gone across the gulley and out onto the freeway becau�e she had watched for a long period of time and they never came back. She added that there was so much snow there one time that it had to be someone who knev� where it was . Ms . Hollenbeck stated she didn•t see how they could have gotten across without being stuck. 6 . Ad,��ourn. �OTIO�V: by Gutenkauf, seconded by Hollenbeck, for meeting to adjourn. YES: 4. NO - �. Motion carried. Next Meeting March 3, 1981 . wb