HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/18/20141. CALL TO ORDER
2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
4. CONSENT ITEMS
- -NONE--
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
- -NONE--
6. LAND USE/ACTION ITEMS
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
JUNE 18, 2014
The City of Apple Valley Planning Commission meeting was called to order by Vice-Chair Burke
at 7:00 p.m.
Members Present: Ken Alwin, Tim Burke, Paul Scanlan, and David Schindler.
Members Absent: Tom Melander, Keith Diekmann and Brian Wasserman.
Staff Present: City Attorney Sharon Hills, Community Development Director Bruce Nordquist,
Planner Kathy Bodmer, Planner Margaret Dykes, Assistant City Engineer David Bennett and
Department Assistant Joan Murphy.
Vice-Chair Burke asked if there were any changes to the agenda. Hearing none he called for a
motion.
MOTION: Commissioner Alwin moved, seconded by Commissioner Scanlan, approving the
agenda. Ayes - 4 - Nays - 0.
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES JUNE 4, 2014.
Vice-Chair Burke asked if there were any changes to the minutes. Hearing none he called for a
motion.
MOTION: Commissioner Alwin moved, seconded by Commissioner Scanlan, approving the
minutes of the meeting of June 4, 2014. Ayes - 4 - Nays — 0.
A. Caribou Coffee Drive-Thru Project — Consideration of amendments to Planned
Development No. 290, Zone 4, to allow drive-thru in connection with Class III Restaurant.
(PC14-17-ZCB)
LOCATION: 14638 Cedar Avenue
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
Dakota County, Minnesota
Planning Commission Minutes
June 18, 2014
Page 2 of 5
PETITIONER: Caribou Coffee Company
Planner Kathy Bodmer stated Caribou Coffee is located in the Cedar Marketplace development at
14638 Cedar Avenue. The property is zoned PD-290, Zone 4, which prohibits a drive-thru in
connection with a restaurant facility. Caribou is requesting an amendment to the PD zoning district
to allow a drive-thru in connection with a Class III Restaurant (Neighborhood Coffee House,
Sandwich Counter, Ice Cream Shop, Delicatessen, etc.). Two key issues related to this request are
potential impacts to the Glazier Townhomes immediately to the north and the reduction of parking
resulting in a parking deficiency for the shopping center.
She reviewed the drive-thru lane design, proximity to the Glazier Townhomes, noise study, hours of
operation and loss of parking. A 10' tall masonry wall is proposed to be constructed along the north
property line to provide screening between the drive-thru and the townhomes to the north. The
masonry wall and an extensive landscape planting area would be installed to help absorb noise and
block headlights. The interior of the restaurant would be remodeled to move the service counter
from the east side of the restaurant to provide window service from the west side of the building.
Discussion Followed.
MOTION: Commissioner Scanlan moved, seconded by Commissioner Alwin recommending
approval of an amendment to Planned Development No. 290, Zone 4, to allow a
drive-thru in connection with Class III Restaurant as a conditional use. The
following conditions must be met in order to obtain a CUP for drive-thru in
connection with a Class III Restaurant in PD-290, Zone 4:
• Noise, headlights, traffic volume and emissions from idling vehicles resulting
from the operation of the window shall not negatively impact surrounding
residential and institutional uses.
• The drive-thru lane shall not impede or conflict with vehicular, bicycle or
pedestrian traffic circulation on the site as determined by the City Traffic
Engineer.
• When a Class III restaurant is located less than 1,000 feet from a residential or
institutional use, the City Council may restrict the hours of operation of a drive-
thru window to mitigate any adverse impacts caused by noise, headlights, traffic
volume and emissions from idling vehicles.
• If the installation of the drive-thru facilities result in the loss of parking spaces,
then the resulting parking spaces available for the entire site shall meet the
parking requirements set forth in this Chapter or the petitioner shall demonstrate
that the resulting parking on the entire site can satisfactorily serve the current
and any future uses in accordance with the zoning code provisions.
Ayes - 4 - Nays - 0.
B. MVTA Bus Layover Facility — Consider zoning amendments to PD-507 to allow for a bus
layover facility; subdivision by preliminary plat of a 10-acre lot into two (2) lots; interim use
permit for 231-space parking lot; and site plan/building permit authorization for bus layover
facility with approximately 600 sq. ft. building. (PC-14-15-ZSIB)
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
Dakota County, Minnesota
Planning Commission Minutes
June 18, 2014
Page 3 of 5
LOCATION: 155th Street West and Cedar Ave
PETITIONER: MVTA
Planner Margaret Dykes stated the applicant has withdrawn the subdivision by preliminary plat of
the 10-acre lot into two (2) lots at this time but is still requesting the following actions:
Approve amendments to Planned Development 507 to allow for a bus layover facility
Interim use permit for a 231-space temporary parking lot; and
• Site plan review/building permit authorization for a bus layover facility with an
approximately 600 sq. ft. building.
The property is zoned "PD-507, Zones 7a and 7b". Zone 7a regulates the western 6 acres of the site,
which is the location of the Apple Valley Transit Station ("AVTS"). Zone 7a currently allows the
transit station, the platform, and the parking ramp as permitted uses and the surface parking lot as a
permitted accessory use. The subzone does not allow bus layover facilities. Zone 7b regulates the
eastern 4 acres of the site, which is where the bus layover facility and temporary parking lot would
be located. Zone 7b requires multi-story, mixed-use development that must include high-density
apartments, and allows for commercial and transit as permitted uses. The mix of commercial,
housing and transit uses is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
A sidewalk connection would be needed from the transit site to the lots to the north. A sidewalk
connection would extend the existing 6'-wide sidewalk that bisects the site north to south, turn east
and connect with the ApplianceSmart site. This sidewalk configuration would remove about 14
parking spaces. A pedestrian connection easement in favor of the City should be dedicated on the
plat. The easement must be of sufficient length, width, and change in elevation to design, construct
and maintain the 6'-wide sidewalk extension.
Discussion followed.
MOTION: Commissioner Alwin moved, seconded by Commissioner Scanlan recommending
approval to amend Planned Development 507, zone 7b to allow for bus layover
facilities for the exclusive use of public transit providers as part of a mixed-use
development. Ayes - 4 - Nays - 0.
MOTION: Commissioner Alwin moved, seconded by Commissioner Schindler recommending
approval of an Interim Use Permit for a 231-space overflow parking lot to be located
on the eastern portion of the subject site, as shown on the plans received in City
offices on June 18, 2014, subject to all applicable City codes and standards and the
following conditions:
a. The property owner shall dedicate a sidewalk easement in perpetuity in favor of
the City in a configuration determined by the City to connect the subject property
to the property to the north. The easement documents shall be prepared by the City
Attorney. A 6'-wide sidewalk shall be installed when funding is identified or the
subject property is redeveloped for a mixed-use project, whichever is sooner.
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
Dakota County, Minnesota
Planning Commission Minutes
June 18, 2014
Page 4 of 5
b. The parking lot shall be constructed to meet City standards including concrete
curb and gutter, impervious surface, and striping.
c. The interim use permit shall expire on December 31, 2021.
Ayes - 4 - Nays - O.
MOTION: Commissioner Alwin moved, seconded by Commissioner Schindler recommending
approval of site plan/building permit authorization for a bus layover facility and
approximately 600 sq. ft. building as shown on the plans received in City offices on
May 7, 2014, subject to compliance with all applicable City codes and standards, and
the following conditions:
a. The MVTA shall terminate the lease for the Gaslight Drive transit facility and
vacate the property upon issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the
proposed building.
b. The property owner shall repair the block retaining wall located on the north end
of the subject lot to comply with City standards.
c. The property owner shall address the comments raised by the City Engineer in
his memo dated May 28, 2014.
d. The property owner shall address the comments raised by the Fire Marshal in his
memo dated May 13, 2014.
e. The property owner shall address the comments raised by the Natural Resources
Coordinator in his memo dated May 23, 2014.
fi The property owner shall address the comments raised by the Crime Prevention
Specialist in her memo dated May 22, 2014.
Ayes - 4 - Nays - 0.
C. Amendment to Chapter 154 (Sign Regulations) - Consider amendments to Chapter 154
(Sign Regulations) to amend Appendix C. (PC14-20-0)
LOCATION: City Wide
PETITIONER: City of Apple Valley
Planner Margaret Dykes reported as staff was completing recent amendments to the City's Sign
Code, the City Attorney advised that amendments should also be done for Institutional Signs.
Institutional uses are limited in the amount of signage that is allowed on a particular site, and the
allowable signage for these uses is significantly less than commercial uses. The limited amount of
signage has proven problematic in the past because Institutional uses are generally on larger lots and
may have several buildings on the site.
The City Attorney advised that the Code must be content neutral. Signs cannot be regulated based
solely on the content of the sign or on the user. It is the sign that must be regulated, not who has the
sign or what the sign "advertises".
The Code allows properties zoned for Institutional uses to have one (1) 40 sq. ft. ground sign and
one (1) 40 sq. ft. building sign. Institutional uses include churches, libraries, parks, government
buildings, courthouses, schools, and similar public or quasi-public uses. It is staff's opinion that
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY
Dakota County, Minnesota
Planning Commission Minutes
June 18, 2014
Page 5 of 5
one 40 sq. ft. building sign may not be adequate for the size of these buildings, and one 40 sq. ft.
ground sign may not be adequate for the use.
Institutional uses are generally larger and staff believes they should be allowed the same amount of
signage as those uses located in Neighborhood Commercial, General Business, Retail Business,
Industrial, and Business Park districts. These districts are allowed up to 500 sq. ft. of building sign,
but the method of calculating the signage is based currently on the retail floor area.
Staff believes that increasing the size of the signs allowed for Institutional districts is needed, but
the method of calculating the signs should be based on the total floor area. Also, no Institutional
use should be allowed only a total of 500 sq. ft. of building signage per site. This would allow
multiple buildings on an Institutional site to have signage, provided the total signage for the site did
not exceed 500 sq. ft.
Discussion followed.
MOTION: Commissioner Scanlan moved, seconded by Commissioner Alwin recommending
approval of the draft ordinance amending Chapter 154 of the Code of Ordinances
(Signs). Ayes - 4 - Nays - 0.
7. OTHER BUSINESS
A. Review of upcoming schedule and other updates.
Community Development Director Bruce Nordquist stated that the next Planning Commission
meeting would take place Wednesday, July 16, 2014, at 7:00 p.m.
8. ADJOURNMENT
Hearing no further comments from the Planning Staff or Planning Commission, Vice-Chair Burke
asked for a motion to adjourn.
MOTION: Commissioner Scanlan moved, seconded by Commissioner Alwin to adjourn the
meeting at 7:37 p.m. Ayes - 4 - Nays - 0.
Respectfully Submitted,
Murphy, Planning Eepart
t Assistant
Approved by the Apple Valley Planning Commission on