Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/15/2016••• •••• ••••• •••• ••• City of Apple VaIiey Meeting Location: Municipal Center 7100 147th Street West Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124 JUNE 15, 2016 PLANNING COMMISSION TENTATIVE AGENDA 7:00 P.M. This agenda is subject to change by deletion or addition to items until approved by the Planning Commission on the date of the meeting. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF JUNE 1, 2016 4. CONSENT ITEMS - -NONE-- 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS - -NONE-- 6. LAND USE/ACTION ITEMS A. Pennock Center Parking Variance —Consider Variance and revised Site Plan to reduce the number of required parking spaces from 43 to 32 for a coffee shop and non-food retail space. (PC16-21-V) LOCATION: 7668 150th Street West PETITIONER: Java Capital Partners 7668 150th St., LLC B. Delegard Apple Villa Apartments — Consider Comprehensive Plan Amendment from "MD" (Medium Density Residential, 6 to 12 units/acre) to "HD" (High Density Residential, 12+ units/acre), rezoning from "M -7C" (Multiple family residential, 12 to 20 units/acre) to "PD" (Planned Development) and site plan review/building permit authorization to construct a 28 -unit apartment building. (PC 16-18-PZB) LOCATION: 7800 Whitney Drive PETITIONER: Delegard Apple Villa Properties LLC C. PHS Cobblestone Lake Senior Housing Development —Consider Comprehensive Plan Amendment, rezoning, replat of existing outlots and site plan/building permit authorization to allow for the construction 195 -unit continuum of care facility. (PC16-14-PZSB) LOCATION: Intersection of 157th Street West and Cobblestone Lake Parkway PETITIONER: Tradition Development and Presbyterian Homes and Services 7. OTHER BUSINESS A. Review of upcoming schedule and other updates. 8. ADJOURNMENT NEXT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGS Wednesday, July 20, 2016 Regular Scheduled Meeting - Public hearing applications due by 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday, June 22, 2016 - Site plan, variance applications due by 9:00 a.m. on Monday, July 11, 2016 Wednesday, August 3, 2016 Regular Scheduled Meeting - Public hearing applications due by 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday, July 6, 2016 - Site plan, variance applications due by 9:00 a.m. on Monday, July 25, 2016 NEXT CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS Thursday, June 23, 2016 Regular Scheduled Meeting Thursday, July 14, 2016 Informal Regular Scheduled Meeting 7:00 P.M. 7:00 P.M. 7:00 P.M. 5:30 P.M. 7:00 P.M. Regular meetings are broadcast live on Charter Communications Cable, Channel 180. Agendas are also available on the City's Internet Web Site http://www.cityofapplevalley.org. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 1, 2016 1. CALL TO ORDER The City of Apple Valley Planning Commission meeting was called to order by Chair Melander at 7:01 p.m. Members Present: Tom Melander, Ken Alwin, Tim Burke, Keith Diekmann, Angela Polozun, Paul Scanlan and David Schindler. Members Absent: None Staff Present: City Attorney Sharon Hills, Community Development Director Bruce Nordquist, City Planner Tom Lovelace, City Engineer Brandon Anderson and Department Assistant Joan Murphy. 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Chair Melander asked if there were any changes to the agenda. Hearing none he called for a motion. MOTION: Commissioner Diekmann moved, seconded by Commissioner Scanlan, approving the agenda. Ayes - 7 - Nays - 0. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES MAY 18, 2016 Chair Melander asked if there were any changes to the minutes. Hearing none he called for a motion. MOTION: Commissioner Diekmann moved, seconded by Commissioner Burke, approving the minutes of the meeting of May 18, 2016. Ayes - 7 - Nays - 0. 4. CONSENT ITEMS - -NONE-- 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS - -NONE-- 6. LAND USE/ACTION ITEMS A. PHS Cobblestone Lake Senior Housing Development — Consideration of comprehensive plan amendment, rezoning, replat of existing outlots and site plan/building permit authorization to allow for the construction 175 -unit continuum of care facility. (PC16-14-PZSB) CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes June 1, 2016 Page 2 of 3 LOCATION: Intersection of 157th Street West and Cobblestone Lake Parkway PETITIONER: Tradition Development and Presbyterian Homes and Services City Planner Tom Lovelace stated the applicant originally proposed a 175 -unit continuum of care complex on 12.28 acres. The applicant has revised their plans and is now proposing a 193 -unit building. The site is located along the east side of Cobblestone Lake Parkway, south of Embry Path and north of Elmhurst Lane. The site is currently made up of three outlots that have a variety of Comprehensive Plan land use and zoning designations. The applicant is proposing to replat the existing outlots into one (1) lot and one (1) outlot. The proposed lot will be the location of a continuum of care facility and the outlot will be dedicated as public park. Approval of amendments to the City's 2030 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map, rezoning of the property and site plan review/building permit authorization are other entitlements needed for this project. The site plan identifies future expansion that will include an additional 64 independent living units and an 80 -bed skilled nursing facility, which will need future City review and consideration. The applicant is proposing to rezone Lot 1, Block 1, PRESBYTERIAN HOMES AT COBBLESTONE LAKE to a subzone that would allow for the proposed continuum of care facility. The applicant could rezone the lot to zone 6, which currently allows for a continuum of care retirement community, subject to the following requirements: 1. If more than one structure is used for a continuum of care retirement community, all structures shall be located on a single parcel or lot under single ownership; 2. No more than 15% of the total units provided shall be for assisted living; 3. No more than 15% of the total units provided shall be for comprehensive, intensive or full care living; and 4. The density of the total units shall not exceed 32 units per acre. The revised project will contain twice the percentage of assisted living units currently allowed by the planned development ordinance. An amendment to the current planned development ordinance requirements in zone 6 will be needed to bring the project into conformance. John Mehrkens, Presbyterian Homes and Services, provided additional information. Discussion followed. 7. OTHER BUSINESS A. Review of upcoming schedule and other updates. Community Development Director Bruce Nordquist stated that the next Planning Commission meeting would take place Wednesday, June 15, 2016, at 7:00 p.m. CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Dakota County, Minnesota Planning Commission Minutes June 1, 2016 Page 3 of 3 8. ADJOURNMENT Hearing no further comments from the Planning Staff or Planning Commission, Chair Melander asked for a motion to adjourn. MOTION: Commissioner Schindler moved, seconded by Commissioner Scanlan to adjourn the meeting at 8:04 p.m. Ayes - 7 - Nays - 0. Respectfully Submitted, rktv-kt_ Jo Murphy, Planning De artmen ssistant Approved by the Apple Valley Planning Commission on Tom Melander, Chair .00 0.00 0.000 0000 00. City of Apple Valley ITEM: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: SECTION: A June 15, 2016 Land Use Action PROJECT NAME: Pennock Center Parking Variance and Revised Site Plan PROJECT DESCRIPTION Consideration of a variance to reduce the required number of parking spaces from 43 to 32 and revised site plan for 5,400 sq. ft. building containing a coffee shop with drive-thru lane and non-food retail or office at 7668 — 150th Street W. STAFF CONTACT: Kathy Bodmer, Planner DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Community Development Department APPLICANT: Java Capital Partners — 7668 150th St LLC PROJECT NUMBER: PC 16 -21 -VB APPLICATION DATE: 60 DAYS: 120 DAYS: June 7, 2016 August 5, 2016 October 4, 2016 Proposed Action 1. Recommend approval of a variance to reduce the number of required parking spaces from 43 to 32 spaces for a Class III restaurant with 50 indoor seats and 22 outdoor seats and 3,100 sq. ft. non-food retail or office use based upon the finding that a parking study confirmed that the approved uses will need 29 to 33 parking spaces. 2. Recommend approval of a revised site plan for 5,400 sq. ft. building containing a Class III restaurant with drive-thru lane and non-food retail or small office, subject to compliance with all City Codes and the following conditions: a. A nursery bid list shall be submitted at time of application of the building permit that confirms the value of the landscape plantings meet or exceed 2-1/2% of the value of construction of the building based on Means Construction Data. b. The owner shall execute a License to Encroach Agreement with the City to construct four parking stalls and the drive aisle within the City easement. c. The owner shall execute a maintenance agreement for the long-term maintenance of the retention area. d. No sign approvals are given at this time. A separate sign permit must be obtained prior to the installation of any signs on the site. The signs shown on the site plan do not meet the sign requirements and must be revised at the time of application of the building permit. e. The building elevations shall be reviewed and approved by the City Council. f. The petitioner shall submit an auto turn drawing that confirms that fire vehicles can safely circulate around the site when there are parked vehicles and vehicles in the drive- thru lane. g. Plans shall be revised at time of application of the building permit to address the City Engineer's memo of June 10, 2016. Project Summary/Issues Java Capital Partners — 7668 150th St LLC received approvals for the Pennock Center development, on the southeast corner of Pennock Lane and CSAH 42 (7668 - 150th Street W.), on February 11, 2016. The project involves the demolition of the Liberty Tax building and construction of a new 5,400 sq. ft. building with a coffee shop, coffee drive-thru and non-food retail or small office. The plan approved in February required a shared parking agreement with one of the adjacent property owners; unfortunately, the parties have not been able to reach an agreement for shared parking. So, the petitioners are requesting consideration of a variance to reduce the required number of parking spaces from 43 to 32 and a revised site plan and a revised site plan that will create additional parking on the site. Revised Site Plan: The size of the building is the same as previously approved, but the building has been moved north on the site. Instead of two rows of parking north of the building, one aisle of parking is provided with a one-way drive aisle and the drive-thru queuing lane. Parking is added to the east and south sides of the site. The petitioners are able to increase the parking on the site from 29 spaces to 32 spaces. The drive-thru lane and window continue to be located on the southwest corner of the building. Stacking is available for nine vehicles in the drive-thru lane. The plans indicate that a trash room will be located in the building, so no outdoor dumpster enclosure is proposed. The shared access with Firestone is no longer shown leaving one access for the site. Elevations: The front of the building will be relocated from the north to the south side of the building. An elevation drawing was not available in time for inclusion in the staff report. Staff is concerned that the north elevation will need to be designed to not appear to be a "back of building." The City Code requires the exterior design of all four sides of a building to be equally attractive. An elevation drawing will be presented the night of the Planning Commission meeting. Parking Variance: A parking variance is requested to reduce the number of required parking spaces from 43 to 32. A parking study was conducted which confirms that a coffee shop with drive-thru and non-food retail requires only 29 to 33 spaces. Thirty-two spaces are available on the site. The two uses are expected to have peak activity at different times, so staff is comfortable that 32 parking spaces are sufficient on the site. Budget Impact N/A Attachment(s) 1. City Engineer Memo 2. Location Map 3. Oblique Aerial Photo 4. Zoning Map 5. Removals Plan 6, Site Plan 7. Grading & Erosion Control 8. Utilities 9. Landscape Plan 10. SWPP Plan 11. Building Elevations 12. Parking Study 13. Traffic Study Pennock Center PROJECT REVIEW Existing Conditions Property Location: 7668 — 150th Street West Legal Description: Lot 1, Block 1, Apple Valley Square 2nd Addition Comprehensive Plan Designation C -Commercial Zoning Classification RB -Retail Business Existing Platting Platted Lot Current Land Use Office building Size: 36,643 sf (0.841 acres) Topography: Flat Existing Vegetation Urban landscape. Other Significant Natural Features Some existing mature trees are located on the site and may need to be removed in connection with this project. Adjacent Properties/Land Uses NORTH Bruegger's, Panda Express (north of CSAH 42) Comprehensive Plan C -Commercial Zoning/Land Use RB -Retail Business SOUTH Apple Valley Square Shopping Center Comprehensive Plan C -Commercial Zoning/Land Use RB -Retail Business EAST Firestone Auto Care Comprehensive Plan C -Commercial Zoning/Land Use RB -Retail Business WEST Grace Lutheran Church (west of Pennock Lane) Comprehensive Plan INS -Institutional Zoning/Land Use P -Institutional Development Project Review Comprehensive Plan: The 2030 Comprehensive Plan guides the development of the site for "C" (Commercial) uses. A Class III Neighborhood Restaurant and a non-food retail are both consistent with the comp plan designation. Zoning: The property is zoned "RB" (Retail Business). A Class III neighborhood restaurant and non-food retail or small office are permitted uses in the zoning district. A conditional use permit (CUP) was requested and approved for a drive-thru window in connection with a Class III Restaurant. A parking variance is requested to reduce the number of required parking spaces from 43 to 32. A parking study was conducted which confirms that a coffee shop with drive-thru and non-food retail requires only 29 to 33 spaces. The parking study further explains that the two uses will have different peak times, so the parking on the site should be sufficient. Parking Demand Study Use City Parking Requirement Weekday Average Weekends (# spaces) (1* spaces) Coffee (50 iinsc outside seats) Non -Food Retail/ Small Office Total 20.2 42.6 4 to 10 (depending 5 to 9 (depending on use) 27 to 33* on use) 24 to 28 * 32 parking spaces provided on site Preliminary Plat: The property is currently platted. No change to the plat is requested. Site Plan: The previous site plan was dependent upon a shared parking agreement with the Firestone property to the east. A revised site plan authorization is requested that no longer includes the Firestone shared access and parking. The size of the building is the same as previously approved, but the building has been moved north on the site. Instead of two rows of parking north of the building, only one aisle of parking is provided with a one-way drive lane and the drive-thru queuing lane. Parking is added to the east and south sides of the site. The petitioners are able to increase the parking on the site from 29 spaces to 32 spaces. The drive-thru lane and window continue to be located on the southwest comer of the building. Stacking is available for nine vehicles in the drive-thru lane. The front door will be moved to the south side of the building, which will make the appearance of the north elevation a concern. The plans indicate that a trash room will be located in the building, so no outdoor dumpster enclosure is proposed. The shared access with Firestone is no longer shown leaving one access on the southeast corner of the site. Grading Plan: The site is relatively flat. Specific grading and drainage issues were identified by the City Engineer as outlined in his November 20, 2015, memo. Approval of the project would be subject to compliance with the City Engineer's memo. Elevation Drawings: Elevation drawings were not received in time for the Planning Commission staff report. Staff is concerned that the north elevation adjacent to CSAH 42 not appear to be a "back of building." Landscape Plan: Landscape materials must be installed with a minimum value of 2-1/2% of the value of construction of the building. The current landscape plan shows shrubs along the north property line. Municipal Utilities: Utilities are currently located on the site. See City Engineer's memo related to specific requirements for the stormwater retention area and utility connections. A maintenance agreement will be needed for the long term maintenance of the retention area. Street Classifications/Accesses/Circulation: The site abuts 150th Street W./CSAH 42 (Principal Arterial) and Pennock Avenue (Collector) but does not have direct access to either street. Instead, all access to the parcel will be taken from an internal driveway off of the Apple Valley Square Shopping Center driveway. Pedestrian Access: Pedestrian access is shown from the Pennock Avenue ring route sidewalk on the west side of the site and along the east property line from County Road 42 to the south property line. Public Safety Issues: The Fire Marshal requests review of the site's turning radii to ensure a fire truck can circulate through the site. Recreation Issues: None identified. No park dedication will be required in connection with this project because there is no subdivision of the property. Signs: No sign approvals are given at this time. No signs may be installed prior to the issuance of a permit. A separate sign permit must be obtained prior to the installation of any signs on the site or the building. Public Hearing Comments: No public hearing is required for consideration of a variance and site plan review/building permit authorization. City of Apple Valley MEMO Public Works Department TO: Kathy Bodmer, Planner FROM: Brandon Anderson, City Engineer DATE: June 10, 2016 SUBJECT: 7668 150th Street West — Pennock Center Kathy, following is comments on the Pennock Center site plan Revised June 9, 2016. Please include these comments as conditions to approval. General • Provide a copy of the executed Minnesota Department of Health, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Met Council, Department of Labor and any other required permits prior to Building permit authorization. • A Natural Resource Management Permit (NRMP) will be required prior to any land disturbing activity commences. Site • Provide access agreement for entrance from private property to the south. Confirm permission to stripe entrance on the Regency property at Pennock as shown outside the property boundary. • Stormwater Pond and Infiltration Basin Construction and Maintenance Agreement will be required as part of Development Agreement and be privately owned and maintained. • See attached updated Traffic Study memo regarding impacts to public infrastructure. Storm Drainage and Grading • Provide soil borings at proposed infiltration basin prior to building permit approval. We do not have information on the clay content of the topsoil; high clay content could cause the basin to fail. This area is currently under asphalt and additional scarification or correction may be necessary for infiltration basin to properly function. • Additional spot elevations and details are required along the eastern property line to show how grades will tie into adjacent property line (firestone). Erosion Control • All previous comments have been addressed. Utilities • All previous comments have been addressed. Natural Resources • All previous comments have been addressed. WHITECASTLE J.®N`�TI NrDR rommuwat Ale1410._fz-4 is:.iI 6.11 �e� r 4 D TITST 290 1 PD -290 2 3 w ce 2 LAZIER AVE 150TH ST W 2 rl 2 Fp-24 It 151ST ST W < PD -244 PD -541 1 r 153RD ST W M -6C 3 I 532 PD -507 7A 7B J Q W Q W C / -J Ca 9L999 NIN NelVd 9910119 '00Z 311119 13321191-1199193M MEW 011 13381S H10S1 8991 S213N.L91Vd 1VJJdV3 vAvr 99199 N55'A3TIVA Tkicar 'M IS 141091 898L N311430 N3ONN3d REMOVAL NOTES: . 9 9 1 n 9 9 5 g g g - X V L i 99 1 i 6 1 tij § lil i 0 iiil! igh ii 1 ; 6 f ,-guil-rAH i ;, ; 9 .2 g b 1 i i 9 i i Ei 9912 9 i ° i I wg UP, §il ri i g ; LI ii li NI wt$ tg ' tO li il 11 ig 41 1" gt 0 1 q to 11 i k 16 II* ii 1 H h ii 1 ii ii h II ii eu,99 1.03f06,1_ ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY 99 z 9 REMOVALS LEGEND: 9 !O 9992 ig EE; 9999999# 9 01 0t,3 ogg 9 99 5i9 9 tt t''' gig 91.17S9 'NeItid slnoi is 'on aims '1335.LS HISS IS3M 011 1332115 H1091 9991 9213Nleltid lViIdV3 %Mir $1199 PM 'ASITVA ErIchN 'MIS HIM 89$L N311133 )IOONN3d 1331.021d_ ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY 6 g 0 SITE PLAN LEGEND: BUILDING INFORMATION 0 z 0 0 L60- SITE LAYOUT NOTES 5 3 g ,„t 1: e g 6 Total Requ.d 555 R ,ge * 5 5 ,t2 5 58 PEP;Bc g 0 agri0 ; ht2,0 4 nt= L<2E.q. 00LLJ 0 UJ z z -J UJ 0 >7 5 LO • PENNOCK CENTER - APPLE VALLEY, M 7.1 9(899 NV `N2J8'4 91110119 '00Z 311(19 '133111.9 R191 193M 9168 311 13381S 141091 9991 S913N.1.8Vd 1tfildV3 vAvr 99159 515 'AETNA 214411 MIS 1,110St 9991 1131N30 )I3ONN3d 103r08d ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY 9 11 99 GENERAL GRADING NOTES: WO -P80 nig?! Ir, 4 EVIgg ti!X? i-glg s.c), la §6 pi,41,6F co -g, 6 a.= °I" Vir44 h 99 a Ping giggi) il q siLM 41 @ ily F.?, 9 g=i .(E Ilg Lii 0 V iip, n lb 1.! ,.4„. , .. 0 A ii ,ge agt A . Li hi il2 i$E UlRlill g 1 iTi xff 0 OVERALL SITE CURVE NUMBER (CN) = 87 0 Vj 8 2 g 0 gj 6 6 GROUNDWATER INFORMATION: 6 69 GRADING PLAN LEGEND: <s) GENERAL UTILITY NOTES: 914,59 NW )lildd SIflO11S 'OOZ 311f1S `1332115 H19£ 1S3M 1£6P 3111332115 H10S 18891 S2I3N121bd 1Vlldd3 VAVr " µ+ W IE Z+ r m��' o '� �� z y w < § ggp Ve15,4 pPg§2 gl g gO hi I pten ;�„�, {SWC W �CgCgCK � h = T•: K "�4�J ; _ t • cc I FSS W U J u , LLpE7� Z QN L. =4� W i� Z Tc {y%Q �Q 5y lg Z �< �Fv � ~ F< �� fff///lll 111��� W 7 " g3t/pot2J� X31 Uro g <go rif> Ai II 11 2 4 RN, k, I! Li 1 5 m "� 5 E g§ 4g y rt 160,_W o w` F ZQZUt,,� = o " && 4e� 2,2 wJ s `+ in< O ua m� S 5 li a 5 5 5 -S J� 5 tPt LLLL S 1 41 W-0 p P p Rd 4 irO"y WF O== vi U a4 ES r_gR teqge.Lu 4 §fid V: i.111 of i 11: PI ami tj 6LLSi4 1+6Y 'A3TIVA a'1ddV *IS HIM 6881 2131N33 NOONN3d 133r°ad �_ J O talo®■®�s�®�®�®i�i 1inammommilummdrmmumaa apt '.412gw ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY 5 UTILITY LEGEND: 2 g 5 91499 NW NeNd swim is 'ooz 311n9'13381.9 RISC IS3M LC6V 311 133819 H1091 899/ S8ONL8Vd1VIldV3 VAVr 991.98 POW 'Arrivn TicklY MIS 141091 8991 N31.N30 N3ONN3d 103rObd 8 ! §39 r g § 11! g 94) 0 §Ig g I Li$ t 6 EZ h; EwP Egl Hi I -gg '41 .p)1 41 ix 1 5558 25 8.2 I .6,4 l'ag 355 585 tr585 38 Hi ,5 4 cci cti GATION NOTES: DSCAPE ISLAND CALCULATIONS: 5 'lg. It WA. t c) 5 o2 6 8 Fr' ii! g :4; J 6 h5 91 FP wag k la .4 v, hhf " nom mesommaresmaassusim;;INIM11111111111111111111111111111N11111101HIMMIIIIIIIIICanliffr "t1'41rAU 0(1 8 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY 9 08 5 ° PLANT SCHEDULE - ENTIRE SITE 1 () 6 6 1455 9 11 88 58 !Ag 0 58 83 a 1! i! 8! 1455 55 11 11 1 88 14 555 5 6 53<8558 -5 99 hh 15MM ill' lt 11 A 4 oi gi i5 8998288 8 8 0 rip 5 8 55 gg 14 8 11 gg 11 8 0 85 5 5 5 514 205 8 5 8 5 14 2 8 5 LANDSCAPE PLAN 1(:) a0 2 6Mh PERENNIALS .8 GRASSES 55 KARL FOERSTER GRASS - BLUE HEAVEN LITTLE BLUE STEM GRASS 40 PARDON ME DAYULY 18 UTILE GOLDSTAR RUDBECKIA 15 UTTLE SPIRE RUSSIAN SAGE 88558 0 14 CUL 4.4 2,4 h n sr 961,S9 NW ')RIVd mai 1S 'OOa 31IfS 133aLS RISC 1S3M L£6b 3111332I1S KIDS L 8991 S213N121Vd 1V11dV3 VAVP VLOSS IAN 'ABTIVA 3lddV MIS H10S 1899L H31N3O NOONN3d 103f08d W � � eo 5 W 7. DO NOT SPREAD SALVAGED TOPSOIL WITHIN THE INFILTRATION BASIN. 0 Z J a w 4 W UU W cai0 w Q, ro '53 • ❑ -0 e • 0 Technical Memorandum To: Mark Krogh, Java Companies From: Bryant Ficek, P.E., P.T.O.E. Date: April 29, 2016 Re: Apple Valley Commercial Site Parking Study Pencock Center, a new commercial development, is proposed at the intersection of 150th Street and Pencock Lane in Apple Valley, Minnesota. The purpose of this memorandum is to examine the City's parking code in relation to the expected demand of the new land uses. Conclusions The Pencock Center is proposed to supply 29 parking spaces on-site. This supply falls short of the City Code requirements of 42.6 spaces. A variance will be needed from the City if more parking is not added. The expected peak parking demand on a weekday, based upon the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) and Spack Consulting data is expected to be about 23 parking spaces for the proposed coffee shop and another four to ten parking spaces for the second tenant, depending upon the exact land use (dental office or non-food retail). On a weekend, the demand is about 19 parking spaces for the proposed coffee shop and five to nine parking spaces for the second tenant. Combined, the total peak parking demand is expected to be up to 33 parking spaces, which is four more than the proposed supply. However, the proposed land uses would typically be expected to have peak parking periods during different times of the day. The coffee shop would be expected to be busiest in the morning while the second tenant would be expected to be busiest in later in the day or potentially on weekends, depending upon the exact land use. Development Characteristics Pencock Center is proposed to have two tenants. One tenant is anticipated to be a Coffee Shop with drive- thru. The Coffee Shop is expected to be about 2,200 square feet in size. The other use is expected to use the remainder of the building, about 3,029 square feet, and could have one of two land uses: a dental office or a non-food retail store (like a mattress company). For the purposes of this memorandum, both potential land uses are examined. Currently, the site is proposed with 29 parking spaces directly adjacent to the building. Parking Needs The City of Apple Valley requires a minimum amount of off-street parking that varies depending upon the type of land use. According to City Code Section 155.379, a coffee shop is considered a Class III restaurant and has parking requirements of one space per every 2.5 customer seats and one space per five seats of outdoor eating area (excluding the first ten outdoor seats). A dental office is characterized as a Medical or Dental Clinic in the code, requiring three parking spaces for each staff doctor practicing on the premises at any one time or one space for each 150 square feet of gross floor area, whichever is greater. A non- food retail store is characterized as a Retail Store, requiring one parking space for each 150 square feet of floor area up to a total floor area of 20,000 square feet. Spack Consulting 2 of 2 General Mills Crosswalk Review Using these formulas, the required parking per City Code is presented in Table 1. As shown, the total parking required by City Code is 43 spaces. Table 1— City Code Parking Requirements Tenant 1: Coffee Shop 50 Indoor Seats 22 Outdoor Seats 20.0 2.4 Tenant 2: Dental Office Calculation 1 Calculation 2 Non -Food Retail Store 3 dentists 3,029 Square Feet 3,029 Square Feet 15.0 20.2 20.2 Total Required 42.6 ITE has a document that compiled parking demand data from studies across the Country. This document, ITE Parking Generation, 4th Edition, lists the average peak parking demand for various land uses. Using this information, Table 2 shows the expected peak demand for each type of land use. As shown, the peak parking demand is 33 parking spaces. However, it should be noted that the peak demand for these land uses occur at different times. A coffee shop is typically busiest in the morning, often coinciding with the morning peak rush between 7 and 9 a.m. A dental office typically experiences a peak during the late morning and early afternoon, to either side of the lunch noon hour. A non-food retail store, or potential mattress store in this case, would typically have peak parking periods in the evening or on weekends. Table 2 — ITE Average Peak Parking Demand Tenant 1: Coffee Shop 2,200 Square Feet 22.9 19.0 Tenant 2: Dental Office Non -Food Retail Store 3,029 Square Feet 3,029 Square Feet 9.7 3.7 N/A 4.4 Total ITE Average Peak Parking Demand 27 — 33 Spaces 24 Spaces Beyond ITE, Spack Consulting has also collected our own data for various land uses to calculate trip generation and parking data. Compared to ITE, this data is typically more up-to-date and can be more relevant with local characteristics. However, the sample size is typically smaller as well. For the proposed tenants, Spack Consulting has data for the Dental Office and the Non -Food Retail Store. Table 3 presents the Spack Consulting average peak parking demand for each land use. As shown, the peak peaking demand is about the same for the dental office and slightly higher for the non-food retail store. In both cases, the peak periods for these two land uses occurred in afternoon or evening. Table 3 — Spack Consulting Average Peak Parking Demand Tenant 1: Coffee Shop Tenant 2: Dental Office Non -Food Retail Store 2,200 Square Feet 3,029 Square Feet 3,029 Square Feet N/A N/A 8.9 6.7 8.7 N/A K, 1 N C� Consulting Engineers & Surveyors 12224 Nicollet Avenue • Burnsville, MN 55337 Phone (952) 890-0509 Fax (952) 890-8065 www.bolton-menk.com MEMORANDUM Date: June 10th, 2016 To: Brandon Anderson, P.E., City of Apple Valley From: Bryan Nemeth, P.E., PTOE Michael Narow, E.I.T. Subject: Pennock Center Traffic Study Revision I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 43354 June 10, 2016 Bryan T. Nmeth, P.E., PTOE Reg. No. Date I. Background A proposed development for a building that includes a Drive-Thru Coffee Shop and retail/commercial space is proposed to be located on the southeast quadrant of 150th Street and Pennock Lane. The existing access for Butler and Associates Insurance Agency onto Pennock Center Drive (the primary east -west Regency Shopping Center internal drive) will be used for the access to the property with no cross -access to any other properties. IL Traffic Data AM and PM Peak hour traffic counts were completed at the intersection of County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 42/150th Street at Pennock Lane and Pennock Lane at Pennock Center Drive from 7:00 to 8:00 am and 4:30 to 5:30 pm the week of January 3rd, 2016. 2016 No Build traffic volumes are shown in Figure 1. Signal Timings for the traffic signal at 150th Street and Pennock Lane were provided by the county. III. Measure of Effectiveness Measures of effectiveness display quantitative information about the performance of an intersection or network of intersections. The primary measures that are used in this study are level of service and delay. Level of Service The operational analysis results are described as a Level of Service (LOS) ranging from A to F. These letters serve to describe a range of operating conditions for different types of facilities. Levels of Service are calculated based on the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual, which base the level of service on control delay. Control delay is the delay experienced by vehicles slowing down as they are approaching the intersection, the wait time at the intersection, and the time for the vehicle to speed up through the intersection and enter into the traffic stream. The average intersection control delay is a volume weighted DESIGNING FOR A BETTER TOMORROW Bolton & Menk is an equal opportunity employer Pennock Center Traffic Study Page 2 average of delay experienced by all motorists entering the intersection on all intersection approaches for signalized and roundabout intersections. Level of Service D to E is commonly taken as an acceptable design year LOS with LOS C to D for current year as acceptable. The level of service and its associated intersection delay for an unsignalized intersection is presented below. Table 1: Level of Service Criteria IV. Trip Generation and Traffic Forecast Trips generated by a Drive-Thru Coffee Shop and retail shopping use were added to the roadway network. Trip generation was determined using the Trip Generation Manual, 8th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2008. Trip generation rates were evaluated using data for Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive -Through Window (ITE 937) and Shopping Center (ITE 820). Additionally, trips generated by Butler and Associates Insurance Agency were removed from the roadway network. It was assumed that the insurance agency would generate trips similarly to a general office building. The trips were distributed based on existing traffic patterns in the area and the most recent Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volumes on surrounding roads in the area according to MnDOT. 2016 Build traffic volumes are shown in Figure 2. Trip generation and distribution details can be found in the attached documents. Future traffic volumes were developed using future forecasted traffic volumes according to the Dakota County 2035 Transportation Plan. Estimated 2035 traffic volumes were compared to the most recent ADT volumes according to MnDOT. A growth factor of 1.3 was applied to 2015 No Build traffic volumes to develop 2035 No Build traffic volumes. The trips generated were added to 2035 No Build traffic volumes. 2035 Build traffic volumes are shown in Figure 3. V. Public Roadway System Impacts It is anticipated that the development traffic would be effectively dispersed throughout the public roadway system. The traffic increase from the development (increase of 2,540 trips per day, 50% of which are new trips to the roadway network and 50% of which are existing trips that complete a trip to the development) to other roadways and intersections is anticipated to be minimal. H:\APVA\ General\2015\Pennock Center Traffic Study\2016-06-10_Pennock Center Traffic Study Memo Update.docx DESIGNING FOR A BETTER TOMORROW Bolton & Menk is an equal opportunity employer. Unsignalized Intersection LOS Control Delay per Vehicle (sec.) A 5.10 B >10 and _< 15 C >15 and <_ 25 D >25 and <_ 35 E >35 and _< 50 F >50 IV. Trip Generation and Traffic Forecast Trips generated by a Drive-Thru Coffee Shop and retail shopping use were added to the roadway network. Trip generation was determined using the Trip Generation Manual, 8th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2008. Trip generation rates were evaluated using data for Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive -Through Window (ITE 937) and Shopping Center (ITE 820). Additionally, trips generated by Butler and Associates Insurance Agency were removed from the roadway network. It was assumed that the insurance agency would generate trips similarly to a general office building. The trips were distributed based on existing traffic patterns in the area and the most recent Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volumes on surrounding roads in the area according to MnDOT. 2016 Build traffic volumes are shown in Figure 2. Trip generation and distribution details can be found in the attached documents. Future traffic volumes were developed using future forecasted traffic volumes according to the Dakota County 2035 Transportation Plan. Estimated 2035 traffic volumes were compared to the most recent ADT volumes according to MnDOT. A growth factor of 1.3 was applied to 2015 No Build traffic volumes to develop 2035 No Build traffic volumes. The trips generated were added to 2035 No Build traffic volumes. 2035 Build traffic volumes are shown in Figure 3. V. Public Roadway System Impacts It is anticipated that the development traffic would be effectively dispersed throughout the public roadway system. The traffic increase from the development (increase of 2,540 trips per day, 50% of which are new trips to the roadway network and 50% of which are existing trips that complete a trip to the development) to other roadways and intersections is anticipated to be minimal. H:\APVA\ General\2015\Pennock Center Traffic Study\2016-06-10_Pennock Center Traffic Study Memo Update.docx DESIGNING FOR A BETTER TOMORROW Bolton & Menk is an equal opportunity employer. Pennock Center Traffic Study Page 3 Roadwa y Segment ExistingAADT AADT Increase from Development P pro posed p AADT % Change in AADT Daily Roadway Capacity* Max Volume to Capacity Ratio** Pennock Ln (S of Pennock Ctr) 8,300 305 8,605 4% 18,000 to 22,000 0.48 Pennock Ln (150th to Pennock Ctr) 8,300 1,780 10,080 21% 18,000 to 22,000 0.56 Pennock Ave th (N of 150) 10,100 360 10,460 4% 18,000 to 22 000 0.58 150th St (W of Pennock) 29,500 940 30,440 3% 32,000 to 44 000 0.95 150th St (E of Pennock) 29,500 940 30,440 3% 32,000 to 44 000 0.95 *Daily Roadway Capacity Range based on the Highway Capacity Manual procedures for the lanes, area type, surrounding land uses and access, and type of roadway **Based on the lower range of capacity. Actual capacity likely higher. Generally, a volume to capacity (V/C) ratio should be less than 1.00 with a goal of less than 0.85 to allow for increases during special events and other special conditions. The change in traffic volume is less than 5% for most of the surrounding public roadway system. Roadways with more than a 5% impact include Pennock Lane between CSAH 421150th Street and Pennock Center. Operations analysis at locations with a less than 5% projected increase in traffic are not included in the study as the volume change is anticipated to have little to no impact to the traveling public. VI. Traffic Operations Analysis Traffic operations was analyzed for five conditions: 2016 No Build Existing traffic volumes with existing geometry 2016 Build 2016 traffic volumes and trips generated from build with existing geometry 2016 Build — Mitigation 2016 traffic volumes and trips generated from build with potential mitigation as proposed by the Developer. A westbound left turn lane was added to the Pennock Lane and Pennock Center Drive intersection. 2035 Build 2035 traffic volumes with trips generated from build with existing geometry H:\APVA\ General\2015\Pennock Center Traffic Study\2016-06-10_Pennock Center Traffic Study Memo Update.docx DESIGNING FOR A BETTER TOMORROW Bolton & Menk is an equal opportunity employer. Pennock Center Traffic Study Page 4 2035 Build — Mitigation 2035 traffic volumes with trips generated from build with mitigation to geometry mentioned above. Traffic operations results for AM Peak Hour and PM Peak Hour can be seen in Table 2 and Table 3 respectively. Table 2: AM Peak Hour Trac Operations Intersection Traffic Int. Delay* Movement Delays* Control INT. LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 150th St & Pennock Ave 2016 No Build Signal 17 B 53 7 1 67 12 3 47 49 9 49 52 9 2016 Build Signal 20 B 53 10 2 54 13 3 44 50 17 46 59 4 2016 Build - Mitigation Signal 24 C 53 15 5 52 14 3 41 45 24 45 59 4 2035 Build Signal 22 C 50 11 3 62 16 4 42 50 22 49 54 6 2035 Build - Mitigation Signal 21 C 52 11 3 61 15 3 42 52 18 45 55 6 Pennock Ln & Pennock Center 2016 No Build SSSC 1 A 7 2 0 0 3 1 2016 Build SSSC 2 A 8 3 0 0 3 1 2016 Build - Mitigation SSSC 4 A 14 4 1 0 4 1 2035 Build SSSC 2 A 8 4 0 0 4 1 2035 Build - Mitigation SSSC 2 A 7 3 0 0 4 1 *Delay in Seconds per Vehicle Table 3: PM Peak Hour Traffic Operations Intersection Traffic Control Int. Delay* Movement Delays* INT. LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 150th St & Pennock Ave 2016 No Build Signal 33 C 7 25 5 57 19 5 55 61 32 55 64 35 2016 Build Signal 30 C 45 21 5 29 6 42 48 23 42 51 23 2016 Build - Mitigation Signal 34 C 75 26 6 20 5 62 57 36 48 62 29 2035Build Signal C' 45 26 6 2 37 10 47 47 28 42 50 31 2035 Build - Mitigation Signal 34 C 46 25 7 60 35 10 48 46 25 41 50 33 Pennock Ln & Pennock Center 2016 No Build sssc 2 A 8 4 0 0 5 2 2016 Build SSSC 3 A 13 4 1 0 6 2 2016 Build - Mitigation SSSC 4 A 17 8 3 0 6 2 2035 Build SSSC 3 A 20 7 1 0 7 2 2035 Build - Mitigation SSSC 3 A 17 4 1 0 7 2 *Delay in Seconds per Vehicle The current public roadway intersections operate at acceptable levels. The additional trips generated from the build condition increase the delay, but the intersections continue to operate at acceptable levels. The additional westbound left turn lane provided at the Pennock Lane and Pennock Center Drive intersection results in little to no reduction in intersection or movement delays in 2016. However, the anticipated growth in traffic for 2035 results in LOS D intersection delay and LOS F for westbound movements at Pennock Lane and Pennock Center Drive and northbound left movements at CSAH 42/150th Street. The additional traffic is anticipated to reduce the available gaps needed for westbound traffic on Pennock Center Drive to turn onto Pennock Lane resulting in excessive delays. The additional turn lane in the mitigation results in an increase in delay as seen in the 2016 Build — Mitigation PM Peak Hour but a reduction by the 2035 Build — Mitigation PM Peak Hour. An option for a southbound left turn lane has been previously proposed which would reduce the delay but is not a choice for mitigation due to additional considerations. Results were also evaluated for the internal driveway on-site (Pennock Center Drive at Development Access Driveway). Service levels are acceptable at LOS A during both peak hours. The westbound H:\APVA\_General\2015\Pennock Center Traffic Study\2016-06-10_Pennock Center Traffic Study Memo Update.docx DESIGNING FOR A BETTER TOMORROW Bolton & Monk is an equal opportunity employer. Pennock Center Traffic Study Page 5 backups from Pennock Lane may block the intersection a few times during the peak hours inhibiting the eastbound left turn movement into the site. VII. Additional Considerations This analysis was completed for a previous site plan and is maintained to provide justification for why no mitigation is proposed on Pennock Lane. Maximum queues for the 2035 Build condition are anticipated to be greater than the currently available storage of 200 feet for northbound lefts at CSAH 42/150th Street. The addition of a short southbound left turn lane at the intersection of Pennock Lane and Pennock Center Drive would reduce the storage length for the northbound left turn lane at CSAH 421150th Street, pushing the northbound left turn queue into the through lane. Measures that maintain an adequate left turn lane length is preferred. Although the addition of a southbound left turn lane does provide delay reduction the driveway intersection ends up blocked 40% of the time during the PM Peak Hour. Without the southbound left turn lane, the block time is 3% of the PM Peak Hour. It is recommended that keeping the intersection clear is more important due to safety concerns. Pennock Lane should remain as it is today, maintaining two southbound lanes and a 200 foot left turn lane at CSAH 42/150th Street. CSAH 42/150th Street would not back up to Pennock Center Drive as often, resulting in more frequent gaps and openings in traffic. VIII. Conclusions The development impacts are as identified in the study. The primary conclusions are provided below. • The trip increase from the development is not anticipated to negatively affect the operations of the intersection of CSAH 421150th Street and Pennock Lane. Delay is anticipated to be essentially the same (5 seconds or less difference) under no -build versus build conditions. Resulting Service Level of B/C in 2016 and C in 2035. • The service levels are anticipated to be acceptable at LOS A for all of the other intersections. o Pennock Lane at Pennock Center Drive o Pennock Center Drive at Development Access Driveway • The westbound approach to Pennock Lane may backup past the development driveway. IX. Recommendations • It is recommended that Pennock Center Drive (the primary east -west Regency Shopping Center internal drive) have one eastbound lane, one westbound left turn lane and one westbound right turn lane at Pennock Lane as shown in Figure 4. • No changes are recommended on Pennock Lane to maintain the northbound left turn lane storage need at CSAH 42/150th Street. • The southbound left turn movement for a WB -50 truck is shown in Figure 5. This indicates that the design is able to accommodate truck movements into the site. It is recommended that the curb lines be adjusted and wider lanes be formed if there are issues with truck turning that result in backups or safety issues on Pennock Lane. Most common conflict that may occur will be between a southbound left movement and a vehicle in the westbound left turn lane. • It is recommended that a sign be installed indicating that drivers should not block the driveway intersection. This is shown on the proposed development layout. H:\APVA\ General\2015\Pennock Center Traffic Study\2016-06-10_Pennock Center Traffic Study Memo Update.docx DESIGNING FOR A BETTER TOMORROW Bolton & Menk is an equal opportunity employer. s s s s d 00. 410* City of Apple Valley ITEM: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: SECTION: 6 June 15, 2016 Land Use Action PROJECT NAME: Delegard Apple Villa Apartment Addition PROJECT DESCRIPTION Consideration of the following land use actions to authorize construction of a new 28 -unit apartment building at 7800 Whitney Drive: 1. Comprehensive Plan Amendment from "MD" (Medium Density Residential at 6 to 12 units/acre) to "HD" (High Density residential at 12+ units/acre). 2. Rezoning from "M -7C" (Multiple family residential, 12 to 20 units/acre) to "PD" (Planned Development). 3. Site Plan Review/Building Permit Authorization for construction of a new 28 -unit apartment building. STAFF CONTACT: Kathy Bodmer, Planner DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Community Development Department APPLICANT: Delegard Apple Villa Properties LLC PROJECT NUMBER: PC16-18-VB APPLICATION DATE: 60 DAYS: 120 DAYS: April 25, 2016 June 23, 2016 August 22, 2016 Proposed Action • Staff requests no action be taken this evening. Staff will discuss the public hearing comments and responses at the meeting. This will provide the Planning Commission time to review the information provided and determine whether additional information is needed. Project Summary/Issues Delegard Apple Villa Properties LLC requests consideration of three land use actions that would allow them to construct a new 28 -unit apartment building on the property located at 7800 Whitney Drive. The property currently has three apartment buildings with a total of 48 units. Two detached garage buildings currently provide 24 garage stalls. The petitioner would like to demolish the existing garages and construct the new apartment building on the northwest side of the site. One of the 12 -unit garages would be reconstructed as a single loaded garage on the southwest edge of the site. Comp Plan Amendment: The Comprehensive Plan currently guides the development of the site for "MD" (Medium Density Residential, 6 to 12 units/acre) while the site is zoned "M -7C" (Multiple family, 12 to 20 units/acre). The existing apartment development has a density of 12.6 units/acre. By adding 28 units to the site, the owners would like to increase the density to 19.9 units/acre. A comprehensive plan amendment to "HD" (High Density residential, 12+ units/acre) would be required in order to increase the density to 20 units/acre. Rezoning: The zoning code requires one principal building per lot. In order to construct a new apartment building, the property owner must subdivide the property. However, the existing site was developed in the early 1970s and currently has three buildings on a single parcel. Rather than subdivide the property, the petitioner would like to rezone the property to "PD" (Planned Development) to provide flexibility in some of the zoning district requirements, including the number of buildings per lot. The petitioners also request relief from the parking setback requirement from Whitney Drive to reduce it from 20' to 15'. The third area of relief the petitioner seeks through the PD zone is the number of garage parking spaces required on the site. The zoning code requires a ratio of one garage space per unit. However, today the number of parking spaces provided on the site is 0.5 spaces per unit. The plans show that the new apartment building would have underground garage parking stalls which would be provided at a rate of one space per unit. In total, 40 garage spaces would be available on site, 28 underground and 12 in the detached garage. The proposed ratio would be 0.52 garage spaces per unit which is similar to what is provided today. The petitioners indicate that demand for the detached garage parking spaces is low and that the residents prefer to park on the surface parking lot. It should be noted that the surface parking spaces meet the code requirement of 1.5 surface spaces/unit. The petitioners state that demand for parking is expected to be lower because the site is within 1/4 -mile of the 155th Street AVTS METRO Red Line station stop. The petitioner must submit a written statement of "Public Benefit" indicating how the rezoning of the property to planned development benefits the public interest. Stormwater Issues: The City Engineer states that this site is within a stormwater drainage area that drains directly into Keller Lake. Storm sewer in this area is at capacity and untreated stormwater is draining directly into Keller Lake which is a concern for water quality. The Engineer would like to review the stormwater design in more detail with the petitioner to ensure the development does not negatively impact the drainage system. Additional steps to manage stormwater run-off, like directing more of the site stormwater to the new infiltration basin on the east side of the site, may be required. This will need to be discussed in more detail. Lighting Plan: Overall the lighting plan looks well designed. However, staff is concerned that light levels exceed 0.5 footcandles along the south property line. This is a concern because apartment buildings are located immediately south of the subject site that could be impacted. Increased shielding or different light fixtures with better light cut-off may be needed to address the issue. Budget Impact N/A Attachment(s) 1. Building Official Memo 2. Location Map 3. Oblique Aerial Photo 4. Comp Plan Map 5. Zoning Map 6. Petitioner Statement of Public Benefit (New) 7. Petitioner Responses to Public Hearing (New) 8. Rendering 3-D of Site (New) 9. Cross -Section Drawing of Site 10. Existing Conditions/Topo Survey 11. Removals Plan 12. Site Plan Grading Plan 13. Utility Plan 14. Landscape Plan 15. Landscape Detail 16. SWPP Plan 17. Elevation Drawings 18. Floor Plans 19. Lighting Plans 20. Traffic Study 21. Neighboring Properties' Correspondence 22. City Engineer Memo (New) DELEGARD APPLE VILLA APARTMENT ADDITION PROJECT REVIEW Existing Conditions Property Location: 7800-7822 Whitney Drive Legal Description: Lot 1, Block 1, APPLE VILLA 1ST ADDITION, Dakota County, Minnesota. And Outlots A and B, NAMRON COMPANYS 1ST ADDITION. And That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 33, Township 115, Range 20, described as beginning at the Northeast comer of Lot 1, Block 1, APPLE VILLA 1ST ADDITION; thence Southerly along the east line of said Lot 1, a distance of 379.47 feet to the Southeast comer thereof; thence Easterly 3.00 feet; thence Northerly parallel to the East line of said Lot 1, a distance of 379.47 feet; thence Westerly 3.00 feet to the point of beginning. Comprehensive Plan Designation MD -Medium Density Residential, 6 to 12 units/acre. Zoning Classification M -7C — Multiple family residential, 12 to 20 units/acre. Existing Platting Platted lot with residual pieces. Current Land Use Apartments Size: 166,460 sq. ft. (3.82 acres) Topography: Flat Existing Vegetation Vegetated urban landscape Other Significant Natural Features N/A Adjacent Properties/Land Uses NORTH Townhouse Fourth Addition Comprehensive Plan MD, Medium Density Residential, 6 to 12 units/acre Zoning/Land Use M -6C, Multiple family, 6-12 units/acre SOUTH Oaks of Apple Valley Comprehensive Plan MD, Medium Density Residential, 6 to 12 units/acre Zoning/Land Use M -6C, Multiple family, 6-12 units/acre EAST Oaks Whitney Pines Comprehensive Plan MD, Medium. Density Residential, 6 to 12 units/acre Zoning/Land Use M -8C, Multiple family, 12 — 24 units/acre WEST Apple Valley 8th Addition Comprehensive Plan LD, Low Density Residential, 2 to 6 units/acre Zoning/Land Use R-3, Single family residential, 11,000 sq. ft. min. lot Development Project Review Comprehensive Plan: The Comprehensive Plan currently guides the development of the subject parcel for "MD" (Medium Density Residential, 6 to 12 units/acre). The existing density on the site is 12.6 units/acre. The owners wish to construct a new apartment building on the site which would bring the total density up to 19.9 units/acre; the maximum density as allowed under the M -7C zoning designation is 20 units/acre. In order to add units to the site, it will be necessary to amend the comprehensive plan designation from MD to "HD" (High density residential, 12+ units/acre). The subject site is within a 'A mile of the Apple Valley Transit Station, a regional transit hub in Apple Valley. Numerous transit routes, including the METRO Red Line bus rapid transit system, express routes to the two downtowns and local bus routes are operated out of this transit facility. The Comprehensive Plan notes that a quality, functional rapid transit system should create positive land use opportunities for Apple Valley including additional access to regional employment centers and increased demand for housing conveniently located near the transit stations. Zoning: The property is currently zoned "M -7C" (Multiple family residential, 12 to 20 units/acre). Zoning code section § 155.331(B) restricts development to no more than one principal building per lot unless approved by the City. The existing site has three apartment buildings on a single parcel, but the property was originally developed in 1971. Rather than split the existing parcel into individual lots, the property owner is requesting a rezoning of the property from M -7C to "PD" (Planned Development). The PD designation will address two variances that are requested as part of the development. The PD will also address the multiple buildings on a single lot. Rezoning the property to PD requires a written statement from the petitioner indicating how the proposed rezoning to PD will benefit the public interest. Preliminary Plat: No subdivision of the property is proposed. A rezoning of the property to PD is requested in order to allow the existing three apartment buildings and the new apartment building to be located on a single lot. The existing property description contains some metes and bounds descriptions. A final plat will be required in connection with the project. Site Plan: The site plan shows that the two existing detached garage buildings in the center of the site will be removed to construct the 3 -story 28 -unit apartment building. The two existing access points within the site would be maintained. Access to the new apartment's lower level garage would be taken from the east side of the building. Under the planned development zoning designation, three exceptions from the M -7C zoning are requested. The first would be to reduce the parking lot setback from 20' to 15' along Whitney Drive. A larger setback is required from Whitney Drive because it is classified as a Collector roadway. The second exception would be to reduce the number of garage parking stalls required on the site. Today, there are 24 garage stalls for 48 apartment units which totals 0.5 garage spaces/unit. The zoning code currently requires one garage space per unit, so the site is currently short of the ordinance requirement. The petitioners state that there is only minimal demand for the detached garage spaces; most of the residents prefer to park on the surface lot. The new apartment building would have 28 underground parking stalls, which totals 1.0 spaces/unit. The plans call for removing two existing free-standing garages, reconstructing one 12 -unit garage and adding 28 underground garage spaces with the new apartment building. A total of 40 garage spaces will be available on the site. With 76 dwelling units on the site, the garage spaces available will be just slightly over 0.5 spaces per unit which is the same condition as the site has today. Grading Plan: The grading plan is to be reviewed by the City Engineer. He has no outstanding concerns at this time. Municipal Utilities: City sanitary sewer and water lines are available within the site. The petitioners show an underground stormwater detention system on the north side of the new building. The subject property is located within a stormwater drainage area that drains directly into Keller Lake. Storm sewer in this area is at capacity and untreated stormwater is draining directly into Keller Lake which is a concern for water quality. The Engineer would like to review the stormwater design in more detail with the petitioner to ensure the development does not negatively impact the drainage system. Additional steps to manage stormwater run-off, like directing more of the site stormwater to the new infiltration basin on the east side of the site, may be required. This will need to be discussed in more detail. Elevation Drawings: The elevation drawings indicate the exterior of the new building will be constructed with a combination of rock face block, brick and cementitious fiberboard lap siding. The building will have a pitched roof which will make the building residential in character and similar to adjacent buildings. The petitioner plans to update the appearance of the existing buildings by updating the color scheme to match the proposed apartment building. The trim, decks and deck railings would be repainted. The community greenspace/tot lot area would be enhanced on the east side of the site. Landscape Plan: The value of the landscape plantings are required to be 2-1/2% the value of the construction of the building based on Means Construction Data. A nursery bid list will be required at the time of application of the building permit that verifies that the landscaping meets the requirement. Staff will be concerned about screening of the site from residential properties to the west and from headlights from vehicles going southbound on Pennock Lane. Lighting Plan: A lighting plan was submitted that shows light levels proposed within the site. Within the area of the new building, lighting appears to be less than 0.5 footcandles at the property line. The lighting plan was revised to address a concern about light levels along the south property line. The revised plans may have gone too far so that segments of the south sidewalk are now completely dark. Staff will work with the petitioner to refine the design to address the lighting along the south side of the site. Street Classifications/Accesses/Circulation: Whitney Drive — Classified as a Minor Collector roadway with traffic volumes currently of 2,300 daily trips in the segment between Cedar Avenue and Pennock Lane. It is estimated that traffic levels will grow to 3,500 by 2030 on this same segment. Traffic levels are quite low, in spite of the fact that the street is classified as a collector. In comparison, 153rd Street has 7,300 trips per day between Cedar Ave and Pennock. Pennock Lane between County Rd 42 and 153rd Street currently has 8,300 trips per day. Traffic volume on those two streets is estimated to increase to 10,300 and 14,200 trips per day respectively by 2030. A trip generation report was submitted which states that the traffic levels generated by the new building will not be significant. See City Engineer Brandon Anderson's memo for additional review and analysis. Pedestrian Access: The new development adds sidewalk that will improve pedestrian circulation through the site. A new sidewalk is shown running north and south along the east side of the parking lot through the site. However, no striped pedestrian walkways are provided through the parking areas between the building and the new north -south main sidewalk or to the Area, so protected walking and biking routes through the site to the station are needed. Clearly marked pedestrian links through the parking lot to the area sidewalks should be added. Public Safety Issues: The AV Police Department states that the existing apartment owner and manager have been active participants in the City's Crime -Free Multi -Housing program. Pam Walter, Crime Prevention Specialist, says that additional lighting would benefit the existing tenants on the site. Recreation Issues: A cash -in -lieu of land dedication will be required in connection with the apartment development. Signs: No sign approvals are given at this time. No signs may be installed prior to the issuance of a sign permit. A separate sign permit must be obtained prior to the installation of any signs on the site or the building. Public Hearing Comments: 1. Is the design of Whitney Drive able to handle the increased traffic? Staff response: Traffic review was conducted by Spack Consulting which found that a new 28 -unit apartment building would generate 186 daily vehicle trips with 14 trips and 17 trips in the a.m. and p.m. peak respectively. The study indicates that the resulting traffic volume would be less than a third of Whitney Drive's capacity . 2. Availability of parking in the neighborhood. On -street parking occurs during plowing operations. Staff response: The proposed apartment development provides sufficient surface parking so that on -street parking is not needed. All developments are required to provide sufficient off-street parking within their developments so that on -street parking is not needed. Plowing operations and resident inconvenience are issues between the homeowner's association and their plowing contractor. 3. Owner of property has not adequately maintained existing structures. Concern that new, larger structure will ultimately be inadequately maintained, causing more significant aesthetic concerns. Staff response: On the contrary, the property is actually very well maintained. The buildings are painted, the grass is cut and trimmed, the shrubs are trimmed and landscape areas are clean, the parking lot is clean and the garages are recently painted. The issue is not inadequate maintenance, but rather a lack of investment over the years to modernize the appearance of the buildings. The construction of the new apartment building would include updates to the existing buildings which would help to update the overall appearance of the site. Building maintenance is not expected to be an issue. 4. New, larger apartment building will look out of place and detract from appearance of the neighborhood. Staff response: The petitioner provided a rendering that shows how a new apartment building would look on the site in comparison with the existing buildings on the site. The existing buildings are shown with updated painted trim, decks and railings that would match the proposed new apartment building. The Oaks Whitney Pines apartments to the east are three-story buildings, so the proposed new building is not out of character with the neighborhood. 5. Re -designation of the property to high density is out of character with medium density neighborhood. Staff response: There are a variety of densities within the vicinity of the subject development. The Oaks Whitney Pines apartments east of the subject site is guided for "MD" (Medium Density Residential, 6 to 12 units/acre) development, but zoned M -8C for high density residential development at 12-24 units/acre. The existing density of the Oaks Whitney Pines site is 22 units/acre while the proposed Apple Villa development would be 20 units/acre. A high density residential designation is consistent with the property to the east. 6. Loss of mature trees. Staff response: The trees on the property are primarily pine and ash trees. The removals plan indicates five Pine trees and seven Ash trees are proposed to be removed. The removals plan was discussed with Jessica Schaum, the City's Natural Resources Coordinator, and she stated that she discussed the landscape plan with the on- site manager and was informed that the Ash trees that are remaining on the site would be treated to help resist emerald ash borer. The landscape plan proposes to replace the Ash trees with a greater variety of trees, including Northwood Red Maple, Skyline Honeylocust, River Birch, Prairiefire Flowering Crab and Black Hills Spruce. Emerald ash borer has been found in Apple Valley, so addressing existing Ash trees is critical. 7. The new apartment building will result in increased crime. Staff response: The City's Crime Prevention Specialist, Pam Walter, states that the Apple Villa property does not generate a lot of police calls and has been very responsible and responsive with regards to crime prevention measures. The on-site manager is very active with the Apple Valley Crime -Free Multi -Housing program and avails herself and the property of many training opportunities offered. The Crime -Free Multi Housing program provides training and certification for preventing crime in multiple family neighborhoods through apartment watch programs, tenant background checks, and physical improvements to the property. 8. Removing existing visual barrier — the new plantings that would replace the existing buffer will be an insufficient sound and visual barrier. Staff response: The landscape plan shows a dense planting of Black Hills Spruce along the west property line to screen the view of the proposed new detached garages to the west. Northern Charm Boxwood is proposed to be installed along the west line screening the parking lot from the residential properties to the west. Twelve ash and pine trees will be replaced with 36 trees of a variety of species. 9. Construction activity will be disruptive to the neighborhood. Staff response: A staging plan would be required at time of application of the building permit to ensure vehicle parking and material storage does not negatively impact the functioning of Whitney Drive. Construction hours will be restricted to help minimize impacts to the neighborhood. 10. Is the project compatible/consistent with the Comprehensive Plan goals? Staff response: The 2030 Comprehensive Plan addresses the implementation of the METRO Red Line Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) service and expected improvements and needs related to the enhanced transit service. The plan notes that access to rapid transit service can be a catalyst for commercial, office and housing development. The plan notes that the growth of the regional rapid transit service expands the convenience and opportunity of traveling to employment within Apple Valley, which benefits Apple Valley businesses. The plan to employment within Apple Valley, which benefits Apple Valley businesses. The plan further notes that people may want to live in neighborhoods that have convenient access to transit, which may create a demand for more intensive forms of housing within the station areas. The proposed apartment development has convenient access to the Apple Valley Transit Station (AVTS), making this a prime location for further development or redevelopment. The proposed apartment addition allows for an intensification of development that remains in scale with the adjacent apartment developments and allows for an improvement of the existing apartment buildings. 11. Noise wall was constructed adjacent to Greenleaf Townhomes Fourth Addition when Cedar Avenue was reconstructed. What about a similar wall to block view of Whitney Drive? Staff response: The wall along Cedar Avenue is a sound wall not a screening wall. The wall was constructed in connection with the Cedar Avenue upgrade project to mitigate increases in noise from the highway improvement. A sound wall is related to highway projects, not private development. 12. Bus traffic on Whitney. Staff response: A review of the Minnesota Valley Transit Authority's routes indicates that there is a bus route that runs on Whitney west of the site between Pennock Lane and Garden View Drive. Staff has asked the MVTA to confirm whether bus layover activity may be taking place in this area that would explain bus traffic east of Pennock Lane on Whitney Drive. 13. Expect negative impacts to property values. Staff response: Property values are determined by a complex set of variables that are difficult to attribute to a single adjacent land use. Instead, property values are impacted by overall City development patterns. Single family residential properties adjacent to multiple family properties in the City have not experienced a decline in property values. The petitioner plans to update the existing buildings which will help to improve the overall appearance of the site. The updated buildings, along with the newly constructed apartment building, are not expected to negatively impact the property values of surrounding residential properties. City of Apple II MEMO Building Inspections TO: Kathy Bodmer, City Planner FROM: George Dorn, Building Official DATE: April 15, 2016 SUBJECT: Apple Villa Apartments 7800-7822 Whitney Drive • A separate demolition permit is required prior to removal of the buildings. The demolition permit application must include a copy of the EPA inspectors' report, a copy of notification of intent to perform a demolition, a site plan showing building to be removed and the location of sewer and water services to the buildings. (See attached documents). • Separate sign permits are required. • SAC determination is required from Met Council prior to permit issuance from the city. • Geotechnical report boring log and Special Inspector Agreement is required prior to permit and soil corrections on site. • Page C5.0 detail 6 for marking of accessible access isle is incorrect. See MSAC 502.4.4 for correct marking of isle. • There are not enough accessible parking spaces in the underground parking garage. Per MSAC 1106.1 two spaces are required. • The garage door entrance and ceiling vertical clearance is required to have a van accessible height. See MSAC 502.6. This height clearance is a critical component of the structure and should not be over looked in the planning stages. • Storage areas in an underground parking garage that have a fire suppression system should be reviewed by the fire inspector to address any concerns during the planning and review stages. Things like quantities of materials such as gas, propane and combustibles being stored and sprinkler coverage issues can be addressed. DELEGARD A VILLA A ADDN 0 IP -- 0 z CL J Q W Q W Of J m DELEGARD APPLE VILLA APARTMENT ADDN 153RD ST W WHITNEY DR 155TH ST W 157TH ST W DELEGARD APPLE VILLA APARTMENT ADDN June 10, 2016 Kathy Bodmer Municipal Center City of Apple Valley 7100 147th Street West Apple Valley, MN 55124 efererice: ttement of Public Benefit; le Vill Kathy: A.: artments The redevelopment of the Apple Villa apartments benefits the City of Apple Valley in two key ways - curb appeal, and stormwater management Curb appeal: City staff and neighboring residents have not hesitated in saying that Apple Villa is lacking in curb appeal. The property is dated and the wear and tear of over 40 years of existence shows. Revitalization of the property will only happen with help of the new apartment building's revenue. The terrible looking surface garages will be demolished and this part of the site will now house the brand new 3 -story apartments. The site rendering clearly shows how refreshing this new building will be to Whitney Drive. The new surface garages are strategically placed to help provide a privacy buffer for the single family homes to the west. The location of the building on the site also reduces the scale of the parking areas by hiding more than half of the surface stalls. The extensive landscaping, site lighting, and new sidewalks create a pleasant and inviting environment within the development. Finally, the improvements to the existing buildings (freshly painted trim, fascia, siding and balconies, along with masonry washing and repairs) will add the finishing touches. Stormwater management: The redevelopment of the Apple Villa property triggers the site to provide stormwater management. Stormwater management will be provided to infiltrate runoff over the new impervious surfaces which will reduce the volume of water and increase the water quality of the runoff discharging to Keller Lake. Ponding cannot be achieved on site so a below grade infiltration system will be installed and maintained by the property. This is a large cost to the owners and something that is hidden from view but it is still a very important benefit to the City of Apple Valley and the Keller Lake community. Sincerest Regards, Kim Behrens Kaas Wilson Architects 6 2d .60 Page 1 of 1 2104 4th Ave. S. Suite B, ifinneapolis, M 55404 ike swi an.c m June 10, 2016 Kathy Bodmer Municipal Center City of Apple Valley 7100 147th Street West Apple Valley, MN 55124 Reference: A Erle Villa A*artments Kathy: Thank you for your letter compiling the Public Hearing Comments dated May 18th. We have reviewed all of your comments and have either made changes to the documents or have a comment for you below. In the following text we refer to your comments as 1, 2, 3 etc. and then have attached your letter to the back of this PDF document. 1. A traffic generation report was commissioned by the owners — see attached. This report concludes that the Apple Villa development will not negatively impact traffic conditions along Whitney Drive. 2. We defer to the City of Apple Valley to comment on item #2. 3. The Apple Villa development is over 40 years old and it does show its age. The owners have every intention of using the new revenue generated from the addition of the apartment building to improve the existing site and buildings. The removal of the surface garages will be a vast improvement to the appearance of the site, since they are the most unappealing structures. The new building, shown in the attached rendering, is featured on the site but still set back quite a distance from Whitney Drive. The owners wanted the new & old buildings to mesh, so we plan to paint the siding, trim, fascia, and balconies to match the new apartments. We also plan to wash & maintain the existing brick exteriors. Fresh landscaping will enhance the curb appeal even further. The neighbors have very clearly spoken that they do not think the current site and buildings look good. We are trying to change that and without the addition of the new apartments, the property won't be able to make any significant strides towards improvement. 4. We believe that a three story apartment building will fit into the neighborhood nicely. The Oaks property directly to the East is a three story apartment building and both properties have the same designation in the comprehensive plan. The current zoning allows for up to 45 feet in height and we have not asked to exceed that — see attached for a site section. The design of the apartment building uses architectural features to bring down the scale of the overall building. The foundation jogs in and out, the balconies break up the flat facade, and the brick level alternates to highlight areas of the exterior. Taking into account the single family homes adjacent to the property, the design intentionally only uses two lap siding paint colors — similar to how a single family home would be articulated. The attached rendering illustrates how the addition of the apartment building will give Apple Villa a fresh new face along Whitney Drive. Tel: 612.879.6000 Page 1 of 2 2104 4th Ave. S., Suite B, M nneap 55404 ww .a s ilson.com 5. The re -designation from medium density to high density is supported by the proximity of this site to the major transit hub only 1/4 of a mile away. A lack of density near this transit investment limits the effectiveness of the transit. Apple Valley has an opportunity to provide housing for more people near the BRT and make this public amenity more viable to its residents. 6. 9 mature trees along the west side of the property are planned to be removed. This is an unfortunate situation because the owners planted many of those trees themselves over 40 years ago. The loss of the trees is unavoidable but 16 new trees will be planted around the site to replace those that are lost. 7. We defer to the City of Apple Valley to comment on item #7. 8. The owners intend to keep the existing fence surrounding the property to the West, South, and East. In addition to that barrier, the neighbors along the west side of the property will enjoy the dense landscape buffer of boxwood shrubs and black hills spruce to block car headlights. See attached for the site section of this condition. 9. The construction of the apartment building, new surface garages, and the parking lot redesign will, at times, temporarily inconvenience the neighbors directly adjacent to the development as well as the current residents of Apple Villa. Prior to any construction taking place, the selected General Contractor will submit a Construction Plan to the Building Official to establish truck routes, work hours, site fence and site access locations, and material staging locations. The General Contractor will also be required to host a Pre -Construction meeting with the City of Apple Valley and the General Contractor's respective Subcontractors to ensure that resident safety, construction hours, and worker parking is done in manner that is the least impactful to neighboring properties. Traffic control measures, delivery times, and any necessary sidewalk closures will be addressed as well at the Pre -Construction Meeting. On average a construction project of this size may take between six and nine months to complete. 10. We defer to the City of Apple Valley to comment on item #10. 1 1 . We defer to the City of Apple Valley to comment on item #1 1 . 12. We defer to the City of Apple Valley to comment on item #12. 13. We do not believe that the 28 -unit apartment building addition will negatively impact property values. The goals of this project are to re -invest in the site and enhance the overall property with the new building, site improvements, and existing building upgrades. Sincerest Regards, Kim Behrens Kaas Wilson Architects Tel 612.879,6000 Page 2 of 2 , • •••• • - 2104 4th Ave a, Suite B, Minneapolis, MN 55404 www.kaaswilson.com Apple VilIa Apartments Public Hearing Comments 5-18-16 1. Road design and whether able to handle increased traffic. [City will need preliminary traffic genenationanddisthbut|oninfonnetion—petitionertoprovide.l 2. Availability of parking in the neighborhood. On -street parking occurs during plowing operations. [City issue.] 3. Owner of property has not adequately maintained existing structures. Concern that newlarger structure will ultimately be inadequately maintained, causing more significant aesthetic concerns. [This will need to be addressed by the petitioner.] 4. New, larger apartment building will look out of place and detract from appearance of the neighborhood. [This will need to be addressed by petitioner.] 5. Re -designation to high density is out of character with medium density neighborhood. [Petitioner and City to address.] 6. Loss of mature trees. [Petitioner to address.] 7. Increased crime. [City will investigate.] 8. Removing existing visual barrier —the new plantings that would replace the existing buffer will be insufficient sound and visual barrier. [Petitioner should provide cross section drawings showing building in relation to neighborhood to west, neighborhood to north, and neighborhood to south, demonstrating how landscaping will address screening.] 9. Construction activity will be disruptive to the neighborhood. [Petitioner how will project be staged? Where will construction vehicles park? Where will materials and equipment be stored?] 10. Is the project compatible/consistent with the Comp Plan goals? [City] 11. Noise wall was constructed adjacent to Greenleaf Townhomes 4th Addition when Cedar Avenue reconstructed. What about a similar wall to biock them from the view on Whitney Drive? [City] 12. Bus traffic on Whitney. [City] 13. Expect negative impacts to property values. [City and Petitioner] %%/�' �` ��. �'i /"®� �' ���1 *sEfSltfat 3AiIG113M3N w28'411eh +1oia 140-901.vam unR neadv-wes9Pp-r49u,d Q fC 4o !mil b\ Y:?°4 14"1 t), WN t t lZ-0l 9102.69 P.N./ seek lU p s OZVS9 Nvg NOION1W0018 "S '3AV 31VONA1 Lt1.6 iooiaivoia VZISS NW .A311VA 31ddti '3A1210 A3N.IIHM ZZ8L-008L \MIA 31ddNi 1331'02M F EROSION CONTROL NOTES: affL li dg. ri i 3 • : 11 ii gl 101 g g g . FR i4 HA i EgIhAliviirl h r i'in H 0 t 1 t t 1 " PH Plii! j WI F6 H ▪ g i o 1 qig HP ! 1 eg.nt g -E Iiiiii 15 Ei gth g D b 4 D :It 1 F, P IP, le xl;- Nil gi 4 . ig gE P ti Lq 4 d h P P irb gib' liq i! t 9 I. • t.: e v :. , CITY OF APPLE VALLEY REMOVAL NOTES: 0 z8 0) ox fge' L de, OZVSS NW 'NOIDNIVV0018 ''S '3AV 31VONA1 lt1.6 1001 CINV03130 VZISS NW 'A311VA 31dcIV '3A180 A3NIIHM ZZ9L-008L VIIIA 37c1c1V 133r021d ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY 03 c‘i CITY OF APPLE VA 'oti, g t. " 1 w Er g g r g 1 gl g agg g 2?''i''' gi3g § g ib (1,g Agg 1c) i- : I ,,) ,r ,._ meip qb :uipi i ,' eiii ! § E -5R g ithL4 1 Ls ig * ' 1.1`x 0 ritgr'it .9- T Oi!rliERP4 ; 1 i'j 1 iEgliq ;R. 12 n liglit 1 03 ; °XIII T I PP q qix ri tj LI E EV P ill.111 i ii 4itil g !I g' ' NV! 4 Egi 1 iig gg MI : u i L,' 'weER Ew,:; d ig 5r §. P2 ,If -p I. Pg w i cg Fuj '6'ilill P- 11 El lit h 04'i ' qi / 1 '81 i q i ii Ad il Vcdf 8J 18 xfii &. hl E! : 1 P 1 i il SITE AREA TABLE: 0030303 03 2 , 6;1 Per 03 tg gt e 111.100- 03 03 03 !.3 6 g 8 1 A t SITE PLAN LEGEND. • e e E 03 g03$ t 1: i I° 03 1 Nil 1 Ai 11 1,1 00 00003 Ilgi . 0 2 6 0 t",1 08889 NW 'NOI0NIW0019 ''S '3AV 31VONA1 lt46 1001 ONV03130 I,9S NW 'A311VA 31ddV OAIOaA3N1IHM ZZ81-008L V1 -11A 31ddV L., . 2,1 'El L,I : 1m VW ivi0li. 0lilt i i i V(i '4'n,Ei] 4 0, 01 1 t 62 z 885< 21;vq 5< llig h wi 1 ! . jE Oila 141 gEi i g 1/u5i, 141 g igg i § g gi i' 5 3 °1ri5g gil rg 1 w ? § p ;. grE 11 E8 1 ig 2 F- 1. 1,4 Lp g a VI' eV' aii hyg 8 c,* I- irg X g gg W ir, 88 2528 ' Ow I 1- 5 g pi pj gg igi h§tA-g 1E5. k I t 0 ° ttlie grfiE MAO giip, igLaL2 Y i ph a 1 i g iqg gi 19 g 8E 6' ila -i-r§ gg1`W- ,!,t, ci Vill §OPF, igt1 EZt -11g g t 1 WI ll i 1 El E ii LE 20gY.! ilifil Wig gra l, 1 H 0088 1:40E i i'°E 'U i '' ir2 g U"'qi '''111 VI" !itiggfi s E tE i h I- 1 2 §fiiEt 9p,.!‘i tliVJ cT,,g, .1 .1 .1, 0 § 4 `0 q VP g'ig hr !Alg R i uNi i I i !FOP rfig ii10 61,90 01E1. qg" g. k $ g 5:64 V gihg lipPg. Wu' I i i"t1 F, WI g IE rg 16i 6P N' * t''' egpiR Nig” E 0 h V1 r 1 103r0eld ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY GRADING PLAN LEGEND: 9 gl4 t p E -4 !I: ; Id! <4)4! 11 u,14 28 44 8 k48 484 st °11 CITY OF APPLE VALLEY GRADING NOTES: 828 0gN 9 8 8 28 OVERALL SITE CURVE NUMBER (CN) = 74 GENERAL UTILITY NOTES: L OZtSS NW 'NOIONIWOO18 ''S '3AV 3lVaNA1 1.146 1001 a1P/0313a 17ZLS9 NW '1.311VA 3lddb '3A180 A3N1IHM ZZ8L-008L V11IA 31ddbV a N (i=.40 J in O p ti (i<0!rp��<LL~O� � O O 4111 WwI! Ws Q 06 Eg-8y p O RW,NyOy� � 3Q� F F � � � � � � pi � < W � :g Z � O Rig 1 yyjay 0 Z .t U i uW 1 SSS1 C7 U PI 0- ; W 1Q+v11 a Zg F4NNWg ; o0 W EE E g Ri < wm 1aZO�Q 7 pW 1'� {'ytu'Will ��yp�_<Q~h- W 1� C.� 0 U W g Q K ►O- gg11 11IAD h Q f : `,, ,, W Utpdi �1 �++ g , I Z € 4 Mli 1 011 woi§ '� t LLy1 Z F O U � i ; F �ZimO � a Z }][y/[[ � 8yJ g e e iE;5:1 �P c O i p i rc j�i70 < G F dj _ z ti Di Uca a o g il it W n P i m m'g ; 1 ! W1ali 1 11 G Z� <y; 1 y �h� J H J 1141 O��K��I li pi <� Fpia g i zM-< ti a)ii yWahy Ili '1<'�� ��� �•<"���W il � p� y� NW M � �3vimazpO$�"W��1p� � �[ y � � � Q � u y �pW m Iii tig � � � � li � � P y N ` lilii � t�l ii 1, d Li v, J i- N . K . i Z W < N 6) 1 4 S 0 iliii_ : 4 i Z W m a N pZ< u1 e i Ijil�l 02 R tO<� ffi yl 1 N .E pcT, f o r F Y4 4 r, i d �Mph MMx �cv, ? {{j 2: P $¢�7W F1 r EFW q 5 (�j�AT(�� -+ it �W L e g �p �� �0 6 , Y�J i�qF2 .4Wi � ;' W pl_ N n V .. A .. Q; ,, , e m m e g N N g N g CITY OF APPLE VALLEY UTILITY NOTES: loaroad _ } � o O a UTILITY PLAN OZ0S9 NW 'NO.JN11,10019 ''S '3AV 31VGNA1 Lt46 1001 a21 VO313a bZLSS NW 'A311VA 3lddb '3A180 l.3NIIHM ZZ8L-008L V111A 31ddV 103r0ad _ ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY z 0 a tw tx ib7 c� �Uu 1 O v Ig i _ gW i =ngl ; kli W � g1 mg = o y i <z a z�Q, Ja OJ H= x R, tissS c�N>a Di ao 9 P i a5 Sia O KW f0 W W5, N ¢? 5 O if � �y 4Q `=� W li 1; 1 i il = a 1 g 01 LL (� C� S il � a WPiet Ow �yif a U C0 F I@ J � to LL V Z W D W tJ Z (quo W i Z LI ii i Z ''Z ' O U O O i g i q v ;, ii ; §2 1 i i 1,2 0 i ''' g 0 " g ge Lh mW -"}a P,; r! i z r,5 14 !I 1 r; 1 1 t b lb . .; Eg 4!!!' i Milb, taliffit 5 A m O 0 O ,a V YV i,' , W � O w� Iii4 o ooa i � g !��LLyt 4-� �W 2z��io�y>.OO W O U I I $ uii i Wj p P o x W mPN Qoo m j� i Z" _ ZZ O W� _ ?OOW �O hYie r!' r0i 50z LL $$ � §: 1 ifh4 8& ,4 i eq r '-' i V2 ta gv t.--g Q ii 8 A 1 1 !! 1 A ig O.O ,'o 111 ad<WO 1 i J frNW; m Ji4<J W i gt .U�, W `?5 i W;gc_C9mo va mo<O e, uO ,m ,, m r b m po< m 415 m 2 m O�� O V r; HP,' Jg [jpj� J`$ µr1 pp µ W � � �`f/1 �� W C < � W � � �� OF J W -;i!,g LL Onilg� � O � <q ~ O J S JgE � §gxo o 3h,21 :14g-§Igi 11-4 EE /: : �� 5 W� Q W� � W O R er N N NJ t^ Yf tD g 01 ALCULATIONS: 4 1 1( 0 0 ' • • • 4Wag*rdWAIIMMVCliksdhetWC,PggittiNWtairgt ,r4,14111rig., _ton% PLANT SCHEDULE - ENTIRE SITE 0) 0 0 cc _J 2 0 COMMON NAME STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM Acer rubrum 'Northwood' 0 0 0 a 0 EF, Gleditsia triacanthos 'Skycole' 0 0 SWPPP NOTES: v 001790 NW 'NOIJNIW0018 "S '3AV 31VONA1 LVL6 1001 amvo3i a PZLSS NW 'A311VA 31ddV '3AIOO A3N11HM ZZSL-008L VIIIA 3lddV 0 z 0 103f0. 1 0 titit •:ii ISSUE/SUBMITTAL, SUMMARY W O } Ci c 5 5 5 1 04,3 UOIMAGy oI� nea Exterior Elevations 0 0 LC) wze AMIM.1.030l Pieal-t49I1 Wislu4,4.11.A 1 PR 011•911 d Wd 95 PZ:b 9142///1, spavvy uovM $ 61.03 Lo,:t 9.. I sP31,40N uostIM sL,1 1460.0 L CM I N fl 1 / 1 H El a [1] CI ,141.tral 0 L/J/ 1 / / 1,42 .dAl. &it CI / / / it:3/ Vu-L8,18A eickhti, Pie.31,40,10-9 eiddb`P.691.0-.91A-d I 6 •O,A, CU CU ,,"------;-:_,--_>:._- ,-,---_- .,_---•.-_-j-"_-_-- , ,,,,,-:;-- ±...--- -_-.---- ----.--- -----,----,----,,----_-_-- -,---__—-,,,.--0-,-. i.;-,--,---:_,--—.-----,0,- -------- --,-----------------------_-,,----- ,,,_-------, 1 i'' _e_.-^,,:,------:.---`--,:------'-----'-- --'-'---:----.----e - ;_-- ---r--:- 11 , -11 .:. ,----------=1: .1 - . -----, -- - - -,' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ,,,, _ ,,,-. . .., - -,- - - -47,, ,:,—, ,- ,_ „...- -, - -_,.-,.-.,--, .. -.-„ .,,-, - - - ----.-.-•._ _ l-- - -__ __- ---',..--- - - - , - - -_ ..--,., , _.- : , ,- - 1 _:,-, •-•,_ -,_r.,. , r..._„.,--- ,-,--- , , _ , _ _ _._,.-_ -_,>,-, --, „_,,...- - --'."-• ,-...:-r-...,.;...---- ____----- _,,..._-------="------;:-=,'"--;_:------ ._......-_,,,---_,._ . ' 'r, - ------,,,,•--:_,--,-- = -, : ,-- - : -- -.------- ----- = ---, -, -,-- -3 -',-' _--'---- ---:_-_-_,C-----. ,,,---. _-_,--,----, - - .--' ---- ------;-----I------- '''-:-.'-------C--:-..-------''':-'t-----------'---*--'''----'-----'''---'----''''''----.---'--------------------:1---'S'l ,,,,r__ -----,:°:________t,7-1,------------- ''--1--:- ------ ,,-_-_, rici ,zsv swat, spovvie uosion se.).604.o ---il—:;fa __, '-:—'''''------e'''I----'----:--'---%"_,----'._-;—.,_--;L:;__.,',---.-----. :,-.....-----,w4-,-<'..7.' ''..--- .7-0:-..''''., ,——--------------'' —,...--,—,----- -- .--.,r------,--- ,,,W,,,,,,r-_.,- --,-,. 7 - ,___,__------.1%-----„,..—_,---_—,--..„---— --_____,_„_.,---,--,--„,:-_,—,. .,,,,,,---. —,-------,,--,--,-----— Nici cro:vz=v sIOZIZIP I sP.I3N ue.010s.)114...031 i I I I I L _ _ _ J I I i I i I L _ _ _ J I I I I I I L _ _ _ J I i I I I I L _ _ _ J t i i I I I L ._ _ _ J t I I I I 11 L _. _ _ J I I I I I L _ _ _ J I I I I I I L _ _ _ J I I I 1 i i L _ _ _ J I 11 1 11 t I L _ _ _ J i I I I L _______1 t 1 I i I I L _ _ _ J dAl .9',11 in,8AeleA P1.11,1 -1091,I 1,00 +4.*AtleA Wi¢d-PJe 011911 d I I. YV :PZ:V 91,Z. sP.140N 14,,!A&O d '642== •ano:=Z::"" .4 Am.., seuaa,146.0 6.44. 0 ,:311,....0•01 Pr. 1.4.11 Eh!: • - IDV 966eLZ000 1110A, SIN31,118VdV Hin OS A 31ddtrIlVels...,-.0M...11-.4 4IneS DIddV\SleZ t an, Jazno,Adnato Jazno,,,sap, go, z atueuap, sewo),., euales :A9 um, 1W86613/1000 1110A, at.001.1.11,/dV .105 ,11A 31ddV 668L Z000 # 3SVD 9LN/9i/5..1,0 ,ou se :ate3s 9 uo,sJaA 6u9q6n 'A3'11VA SIN3IN111,1V Elinos 31dciV :aweN CiOf 9,4SS s!nol 'IS '00E al!, I.-, a, ,sem E09L dflOtI9 83Z(1021 :WA pandeid Vs03.83MEIVIS • 0001-Ut gee IMO ateatiowartuaav *own ot N 1.L H 011 `7.7, .0 •° • • • • • • • • 9 ,•7 71 At. • (?, • • • • 71 cc; ;7; :•2 (.3 ac; °(') • • .`,f2 .12 .1-_- •7.;1' • .g/ LT) o .,- --.--, — •-, --., .",:, •,..: ,.1 -:,•.---; • ."±- ---,-- -- ,,--„,._ _i „ti .--,, .'," , ., 7— L<"'' .,,- •:-' • - • .'•::- CO) • • • • • • • • • - i.,g \\•!, a ' '''' ' 1 \ ---- _ ) c?-\-;'. ' 2 .21 r r't ' ii'itririTiu-Q1 .4L---. ---,, •\•.:0, ',.-----,. _....f2 .7, .:., .„., . .,.., . z • • • • • T, • .r; aa •F ' 7 ••." ITS ...P. r." I — .1=J , •^ • ---,T.-7:7x_ • . . ;•-;" •0 .0 • 7 „•-; •`,2 —+— •:`;', Fi) LF: Scale: 1 inch= 20 Ft. se lou'''Nlfuo>:1P:7:louApue i6ey>edu:Lsiu:Zuo1V''s:'sya(ad+o LE"' sasod,ndleugleuuoyulwyfivawnwpAaslnpeu'uedl,oa.yrtu'amgs,u6papbuuvbnavtBYaAgwurugns 19Y8668LZ000 in OA, S1N3N118VdV H1nOS VITA 3lddV110V1....PLE.M1.1L.Wt thi y1.S elI, olddLAS.L L dE.0...L !1d^.0..S2:I\std 9.117:aweua. W0783M8Yit • OOt)I-ZZL rage [MLO 04.1.t110N.u•AV 1MDraM1 at 0 N t 1 H 0 1 1 SeU10),'VeUaleS :A8UMe/Q g uo,siaA 1noAe16uoy 6!1 NW'A311VA 31ddV S1N3W1IIVdV HMOS V11VA 31ddV :aweN go, 9Zb55 NW 'lied nmol 'IS '001al!nSroW�:a,p'APusaw,m.a'w' hails a,el lsaM£OOL dnoaD 83.08 3o,, owed, pue palwn s6yMe,p uo palaf Alle>uPadc aroyl W uopda>•a ayl4uM puauu,IMa, apo> A,wen6a, ape>Ipde Aue yyn.lunidu,o>fe3wwlblfaa ELL to Nweuofwfsawla�duu>Tfawul,daddeayl fwsa,da, ,ou'wulf,owpdwl N4lNTauuwm,ayuau evd ubisa0&aulbn ayfAywle Ifaso.p of w,edu,o>tesFMai Z.Znsuo>A6,aua,o flanallWII *ns WlrnVe of a''yun Pauli Pa11dw,aylp'saauuxM ,aw,a•�eva TugU{xw>Pup.apo,wuwsew)i�aleuwuwwrsa�eed :44W==p,t."7:7« 19VI8668(Z000NOAV1 S1N3V.VdV HMOS Yllin 3lddV=aweua113 668LZ000 41 3,0 91.0Z/91./5.1W) aneys,:L. papynduohili.lyPuewlau,e,edu61sapasaylT,aywAgwllddmuolirula}ulpurslalawe,ed aPaP�nwfe�a>�w,owdu,auAf�,wab+I��aUl�dwledna�ef�wfa,da, c.eva.l>ulwlllr;l,eva AaP.R. c. faob.n..lwarnwsl�musm p a+fgeuv,�6... noleRa faaeww10na u palou se:a�e�S a6egJed,,,,, 1n,0wWn„7: . eWVPd 6uNq selou uaWn+: nJlot Papuaue,ouN 7, safodlnd leu4,euuo+4 nt sluaWnJopA,osyspefe'LPduInal0gY.4'Mf146Rap 6uP46n ay19W Fgws,w,gns Pie pilHUf64MP,pwpi,[,s AIIPJaI?idS afO{1{{,1 UOBdiJFi 'IR"flWWa�ntla, apOJFWjeF1(!?i,ipPJhddP Fuer: .., JSPu,awl.Rao5uPq6nxuwNeweuMJo.sa"'''''naua,n+dowdea :...,di, mu pa,e,s,o papdwl,aWp'saµue„eM,ay,pu BW .4�5>Q 6iiuKMl ay, Fq aiuu^iR asoyt of w,edumJ se cpnal na�M,nJwawn:ail„p11w,MPawlP'"0f l'",Pn,opalpuA,iq,07":::,"°ui.e„ u6lsap,etp spup,..7:,Bva WBepen xpa,o,wW+an ppµ aq 4." P" 'su4,pswpµ Rnl>e aglnµFmnFew tyntw pa,nsew len,JPan{awy,pw BVa Fq PaµPas Plaµ waquH+ aneq s,7n1r, .....i uayy W e sw,Ii4611 u6rcap asayl'scgs Aq wlpd^s uoBeuuo;ul p 1 Zp5 urd u6rcip,ndnw::qar,P.,,,oa,ad�w,:x:6uBv6Bw�+wux,a,dpa,PdJBUP OPgw�Jaa, c,Bva.) J�,16Wutbrleva MP. (,ubRi064+161,uoµv upsRnslA,oryuesrcFRuVF6au3',noFeRasRNeuy64.6nxu I'JV96eetzoo01n OAVl S1N3W1NVdV HIPOS%MIA 31,1.11JtlWelj.1,1 MlBtu.... 4lnoS BIMaWdVSt£Ztt dr.Jo...T....Jo JBLWN\....ru:BweuoBj 1M0)'83M8Ya • Ot�Qi-ZZL 888 0910 Rrai....O 1 `mutNr(.., OL ( 0 N 1 1 H 0 1 1 � µ SeU10)3W 'd eUaleS :AB uMedQ G1 O uo!5aa/� 7 noAel 6u.6il NW'A3llVA 3lddV S1N3WlaVdV H1nOS VIIVA 31ddV :au1eNgol 9Zb55 N"P ds!nol 'IS '00£ al!ns 7aa17S a/si,saM f00L dnoa� a3znoa :10/ panda, 19V 16611L MOO 1110AV1 S1N3K O Vd V 1111105 VIIIA 31ddV :a...1 d 668LZ000 TT 3SVD 910Z/91/5:WO pa3ouse:a!e)5 'a6olx0 uoprN,au,rl>pP uDwMsuD> sua(atl a )n I,a06uNq «L. R+,quu,nyy q tu,awn>oP AgsµP! u vrd ui a apyn y'pans pue paaTan s6uynep sn palru AIR>sN>+ds aroyl M uD0.da),D> xP 4a+ Aue yNw, auripun>.4.1,1..0 6u1.1611ala W kASPIPx. ssH ,D+, gaaeu,D Wldu+l+rPN tayuruan,xiyw BThi's6rsa06WaV�Mlala, uoad ',A6,aW,D sPnryYa6gpa,nswwIenl>e DJPx6a,yym Palgs i uDwnuwD) H PCNA lDu A Pur �aap 6ua46n ag19W Aq paalwgm waanba, apo> AwuCs6a, ape)Addr a,o> STaualssda,dOr xp saWTLda, ye,tsniC aroyl o, Pa+Tdu+D> a sp+a1 aII�W a,PP aa�.,RM,ay+Ps+era vDNrNa aspw oa paYW ^ PPY aq ualuul,ayw sxµD pue saaaauewd u6lcap ITTN spuawun>a, BYa suylpw> PNa Rna>e sy u,ay MnAtw synsa, pa,rnraw My>a a,quoyl Pur gyy Aq paµyae PNY uaagaw aney s,x{lo,{q PaPl�od uoaeuuoyy Pur s,aNuaraed u6nap asa4l tvyn Aq W 1pa�s uoluuuoyul pur twaue,rd u61saP= pasrga>ueuuaNaduwlsAs6urW60WW1>ewdPatrdl>aur swasa,da, (•gya,)�u16yNA6nsva Aq PaP. {,u61sa06ya16n3uDarC+uAS RnsiA p(pua tR,IRTry Ab,arg7rolrya'sRHruy 6y116na41 100- V66BLZ0001P10Adl S1N311121VdV HL(toS VIIIA 31dd.DVW.Pj 6u!MbM\stuawl>BdV LIMS Bil!A aWdVi .t t dr.° nznoa,dnao »zrod,saP j go, :au,euapd sewo,W y eua, :A8 um, ID10166Ba0001110A, SiroNL!lIVdV Hlllos VTIA 31,1V ....ill 668LZ000 N 3SVD 9 tOZ/8/e.e0 pa,ou se :aieDS ,no,tel 6uny6il NW'A311VA 31ddV S1N3W121VdV Nl()05 MINA 31ddV :aweN ger 9ZeSS NW Ved sinol 15'00f .40S 1.,1S S.AA 800E roj paled, W03'83Mil. • 0001-ttL 8813 LWO W VAIA.N'Bnuaw Peolpn1DLL ON 1 1 H J I —1 aSeA>ed uoiu>Wwwr ,nw'+4sua> sya(Pd a }o t,ed twuq u ,ou uoa>ruysu»,q Papniu tom sl P+c >�b FuMuuual4 R puau,n>oP A,osype u ued ul n �� u pamsl sl u6pap 6ua46n ayJ "eW Aq Pa31R+,Qns pue Wein s6,yMe4 � PaJe+s /VF>ePad:' asaA {o wadanca aw 4RM sJwwa,INaa, apo>,(,nunW, ape>rddr FW fµM x,ryp Wo> se lW 1,l u6Fap 6ua46n ayJ io AtlflgPuns ,o ssauaJapun> 7s:WiPidadde xR sa,am,da, ,ou'wuJs a we�l,aw,a'fiINR„eM li4WU ePa ,a61m0 64Jt{, i asp AG Wegsnip>sap of w,eeWo> u somal uoRdWnstn> ASNW l0 f pAil k1611 palrnPa W,P'LLN W PR6a, tjaM PiJ R1 b PaIpW Ii4{p 'SapUP,1PM IhR1iU fna uquae� a>nPa, of wuw� PFIi TIUIJauR> PW; Fwe asP u,W;,Gen.kw s a^M s�fJo k PaP1b,d wpeuuoiy pue suaaweard u6FaP acyl i+e4w k1 W Ipdnt uq=ewgyui Pur s,aWw,ed ,6KaP wdo Paseo ax.W,cy,ad O,aJsAl6upy&! Jo „aJ>oa,d W eq>aue ue uwsa,ea, Lena x,i bw+v6n era W W 14.4 uoarnu K Rm A�NuP s AFw A6 au3'vwte W sRHew bwrfin aµ7 w aasJw wu .72 :•4wPuW wnW puy waq JOu 10V,669/Z000 S1N.V.Ydtl H1f1pS VMA 31ddtNsJVksaEj du1)1-.N.1..wyedV 41.S .411A apdYtS t£Zt I dno.10lazno,ntir ,, nzno,psaPd 9ofiZ saw)), euale5 :d8 um, 19 V tl668a0001f1 WYt 5U3.1VdY.10S Y1 -11A 31d. 4.,14 668x000 tl 3SVD 9 L0Z/8/Y ale0 paiou se :,e3S jf uoislaA ;mak, 6u2y6, NW'A31lVA 31d. S1N3W.Vdt, Rums V11.31ddV :aweN qot 9ZVSS NW'711ed smog .1S'00£ al,S 1aa175 a�el lsam £ooL dnoti9 li3zno8 :1o, panda, woYeaMeva • 000t-zz1 sae [0410 rN'.t+i'.V +x+71 O! t 0 N I 1 H 0 1 1 E 0. r0 E O Z O r - O O READINGS TAKEN AT 0'-0" AFG READINGS TAKEN AT 0'-0" AFG READINGS TAKEN AT 0'-0" AFG O O 00 00 f1 10 00 LL LL LL f0 E t0 E 01 E GROUNDS _Planar_1 O 0 W Z rJ Fes' w a O rr R ac 0 6 0 0 a 0 O b 0 a 6 m cd E A C tU ND6S20D-NDLED6SD-50YN-M-B - RAB01722MOD358020.IES ALED3T78N Series - ITL79604.IES ALED4T78N Series - ITL79610.IES ALED3T78N Series - ITL79604.IES SLIM26N - ITL81609.IES SLIM12N - ITL81603.IES lA rtl O7 O N 00 07 n E rn n rn ND6S20D-NDLED6SD-50YN-M-B ALED3T78N x 2 @ 180° (TYPE ID Z 00 8 W .J ALED3T78N (TYPE III) z 7,p z 7J1 O O Arr. Lum. Lumens M N Lum. Lumens E Q1 0 Z BACK -BACK 2 0 Z tJJ ND6S20D-NDLED6SD-50YN-M-B ALED3T78N x 2 @ 180° ALED4T78N ALED3T78N Z 1", 0 CL. a M P, PI, P2: PS4-11-25D2 Expanded Luminaire Location Summary LumNo j Tag 1 X 1 Y ( MTG. WI Orient I Tilt I Roil .00.00.00000.0000000 0 0 0 0 00 00 r- r- O O O O r- O O r- 00 O e- O O r- O O r- 65 I W 1 524621.902 -1 1927(-4-6T284-71 9 10 f 0 10 I Total Quantity: 66 (21 shown, 46 through 66 ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.F.9-) e -O 0 ?-8- O O Si'O�� 0ER N N O O 000 0 r- Os 0 0 07 N 0 N O O N O O N N tr1 to N N t/1 Lr 1 N N tr1 N1 N N Pi tr1 N to to n t!1 00 N r- 00 00 r- r- 00 00 r- r- O 00 r- P- 00 00 •- .- 00 7,0 tr1 N M 01 r- f\ tr1 d' to Ln N N 01 01 4' tf co , r- tr1 O 01 07 O to N N 01 07 00 co r- r✓ O O 01 01 to to N N 07 01 N N t!1 tr1 'Cr [f 01 O O 00 r\ n N N 01 01 07 00 � co M Q' 01 'ct LO N N N 01 01 .- t/1 � Q• M in n 'V' [f tr1 n N. N N O, 01 r .- tr1 �t K1 Os tri O N. N. N. N 01 O, :,1r e- 00 O� e- M N O to O N n to N N 01 01 r r- O r-- n r- CO N N tD O e4 O to N N 07 01 r r- N O N M M d' N1 N N tr1 .1 N N Q\ 01 � r- M r-,0 r-- 00 C 16 O d' 4 N N I, to - M CO CO 01 C0 v g N N in an M� r;12 00 00 t1 .- v, N N in to a [r'1 01 01 V01 100 to d' N N to to N M- D: O N n 70 �t •5,-_,' N to in Er,- CrO N O M n ct N N in to M A 0, ,0 O N o t\ �t �t N N to in eN N OT CO O ONO 00 n d' � N N tr1 VI Op M 1O d; O 4 n t-, d' [t N N to to r0- r'',:3 10 n 'O to V �t N N WI tr1 n.a.n.aaaN.aaci.Ek- O O r\ n N N O O 01 01 O t� n N O O O O F. X r i --r r 33313 r r r ep t� d' ct 00 01 [Y '�' O i- Fri tr1 N M tr1 t/1 a to to to tr1 O v'1 to n 00 t/'1 tr1 Qs O to 7a r- N � 7,p M 7,0 Expanded Luminaire Location Summary LumNo 1 Tag 1 X 1 Y 1 MTG HT 1 Orient I Tilt I Roll 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 r- r- O O O O r- O O r- 00 O e- O O r- O O r- OO O r- O O e- DD O r- O O r- 00 O r- O 00 O O O O O O O O O O O O 45 1 P 1 524717.559 1 192556.922 1 25 1 180 10 1 0 Total Quantity: 66 (45 shown, 1 through 45 ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O r� LS,' N 0 0 01 Qt 0 0 Oi 01 0 0 01 01 0 2,/c:,) 01 01 0 0 t: t� N N 0 r\ r":1, N 0 0 r. n N N 0 0 rZ n N N 0 0 Q• O 0 0 O 01 0 0 O 01 O O n n N N" O r� N O po Oe Qs O O r\ n N N O O 01 01 O t� n N O O O O F. X 0 0 0, rn o, ., o. tnetn 00- .0-0 -0 0-0 r: 0-o ao..9_ ato ,o -o to 0- -o .,./2. ra- c- no 00 0-6 n ao 2'-i n - - n 00- .- tno '4 0 tro - e0-0 to� 0- a -o o, rn rn rn v+ rn rn o, rn rn rn rn l/'t to F Fl ttt , r, M M t\ t� N N O� 01 70 O 00 O 00 00 7,0 �O 7D >O Os:N 01 O� 01 Os 0o O t0 �}' M t� t� O N N O� � t� N IL.M er t/1 Q\ 6 M M h n N N 01 07 N t\ M tr1 to � z 01 M M r\ , N N O O 00 00 M M f n OC 00 M M t� , N (c.; Qi 0� M M O O.i 00 00 ,, 00 M M , n N N 01 01 s0 �O r\ , O 10 70 A N N 01 01 07 O+ 01 07 tr1 tr1 r, n � tp O O N N O� 07 r n 00 00 ep g O 7,p 10 tO N 01 01 U1 to M M Os O g 7D 7O O O kO N N O� 01 M M rt' i � � d M T,4,,,,,,,,,-,-,,, r\ r\ N N D\ 01 M M Q d; � r. r� co', N O� M M � � M n n N N 01 01 e- e- O sD Q\ O� ,7 r- n n O 7,D N N 01 D\ r r- O 7� O� 0; r- a- n f\ LO 70 N N 01 � t\ 00 00 00 O 0, 01 70 t\ trt tr1 N N Q• � e- 00 r- r- O� 00 M d' M N to N N 0 07 O� N r- O tY tr1 t1 '� r\ n N N 01 01 iT' M [r 07 00 OC O� O 01..v.;), n 10 N N 0� 01 n t!1 r- M t� � U1 N N 01 01 t\ r- N n e- M t0 in N N 01 07 � d- N N M M VY 00 dM'' tNo ttV tet' �t O O 4? 00 rN\ nt rtrY1 tVo tN p O r trt r N\ 0O 4 C tN Er', 00 t� N r- N M O to 4 4 tNo tN t\ 00 r- N M N tr1 Or\ 4- 4 tNNtNtN to t/1 r- r- M M� trtr rd-- rO tr1 tr1 O O '� fV o 4 4 toN N t� t\ r- r- M M t�r1 ntr1 v' 4 tNo tNototN 00 00 N N N N On O 4 4 V1 tr1 r-- r- M M tri tri s�� �t toN totoN [Y tt O O [t [Y g tOV �' O tNo M M 01 O N - - ttfito to toN tN M M 7T Os N N Moctri * MtYo tN o M M 01 01 N N rdt\ * t�t toN toN CO CO O: 0� •N .:f * Nt tN N OD 00 Qs 01 M MON Qo N tNo 00 V1 O `,O 00 4 d N +nN r- [t N 07 M sD OtcV o 4 tN tN O� 1O O O ct N M' r\t L tNo N 01 r- O n t\ � O N tr7i (LA M O 00 !� 01 ',N MM tT- nV' o N� [t M N r4 N 000 n r� r[` tN toN r- N M d' tf1 sO n 00 0, r- r5-- r- O r' 00 r- O" O N r i N N N M g, N N tri 40 N N n 00 N N 0• O N M r•- N M M M g M M tr1 70 M M t 00 M M 01 O M V' P- N d' [f M 4- C' V' Technical Memorandum To: Curt Delegard From: Mike Spack, P.E., P.T.O.E. Date: May 24, 2016 Re: Traffic Review of Proposed Apartment Building 7800 Whitney Drive in Apple Valley, MN The Duane & Curtis Delegard Partnership is planning to build a 28 -unit apartment building at 7800 Whitney Drive in Apple Valley. This memorandum documents the potential traffic impact of the facility. Conclusions and Recommendations The principle findings of this technical memorandum are: • The proposed Delegard Property development is expected to generate 186 daily vehicle trips with 14 trips and 17 trips during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours, respectively. • After the apartment building is fully occupied, the adjacent Whitney Drive is expected to carry approximately 2,500 vehicles per day. This traffic volume is less than a third of Whitney Drive's capacity. Based upon the information presented in this traffic impact letter, the proposed Delegard Property project does not represent a significant impact to the surrounding roadway system and does not require a full traffic impact study. Traffic Generation A trip generation analysis performed for the development site based on the methods and rates published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 9t" Edition. In this case, the rates for the ITE Apartment land use are used. In addition to the ITE data, Spack Consulting has also collected data regarding traffic associated with apartments. Our internal data is structured similarly to ITE, but specifically reflects developments within the Twin Cities. Table 1 shows the estimated traffic generated by the proposed development using ITE and Spack Consulting data. Table 1- Trip Generation Estimate Apartments ITE Land Use Code 220 Spack Consulting Internal Data Units 28 Units 186 113 3 3 11 7 11 7 6 5 The development's traffic will access Whitney Drive via the two existing driveways. According to MnDOT traffic data maps, Whitney Drive is currently carrying 2,300 vehicles per day near the site. Once the development is fully operational, Whitney Drive will carry approximately 2,500 vehicles per day. According to the Transportation Research Board of the National Academies' Highway Capacity Manual 2010, a two lane road such as Whitney Drive can accommodate approximately 8,500 to 11,500 vehicles per day before becoming congested. The traffic volumes using Whitney Drive on a daily basis after the development is fully operational will be less than a third its capacity. Spack Consulting 2 of 2 7800 Whitney Drive Traffic Review The Institute of Transportation Engineers' Transportation Impact Analyses for Site Development report recommends a detailed traffic impact study be done for developments generating 100 or more new trips in a peak hour. That is the threshold where development traffic may adversely impact the transportation system and intersection operations should be analyzed. The facility is expected to generate Iessthan 20 trips in the peak hour on a typical day. This is well below the 100 trip threshold where a full traffic impact study is needed. Even if the site has quadruple the amount of traffic that's expected, it will still generate less traffic than would warrant a full traffic impact study that analyzed the access intersections to determine if turn lanes are needed. Therefore, a traffic impact study analyzing nearby intersection operations is not warranted for the proposed facility. Resident Comments From: Jessica Williams [ Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2016 4:33 PM To: Murphy, Joan Subject: Proposed comprehensive plan amendment and rezoning Apple Valley To whom it may concern: I would like to voice my opinion. I am opposing the proposed comprehensive plan amendment and rezoning in the city of apple valley on the additional of 28 unit apartment building on Whitney Drive. There are several beautiful big pine trees on the property.. Those beautiful Pine trees should be leave alone as it provides us good benefits for our health. It would increase traffic jammed by that stop sign area between Whitney Drive and Pennock Ave. There had been some crime reports on that street.. If adding more apartment, it could cause more crime assaults in the area. It could cause more noise and less privacy for neighborhood. There are plenty of new development apartment on the East side of Apple Valley area. For example on Galaxies Ave and Flagstaff Ave. It will cause overcrowd on Whitney Drive. I am opposing adding apartments by Whitney Drive. I would like to see the beautiful environment instead of overflow of apartment buildings. It would be a ugly picture of the building without beautiful grass lawn and trees. . Thank you for your time. Jessica Williams Resident of Whitney Drive Apple Valley, MN 55124 lrtS:iA� tatt�tin):t4,uxTY Thomas P. Carlson Nigel H. Mendez* Brianne T. Nielsen 'MSBA Certified Real Property Law Specialist Carlso ssociates LTD ATTORNEYS AT LAW wwwcarlsonassoc.com 1052 Centerville Circle Vadnais Heights, Minnesota 55127 Telephone: 651-287-8640 • Facsimile: 651-287-8659 May 17, 2016 Planning Department City of Apple Valley 7100 - 147th Street West Apple Valley, MN 55124 Re: Comprehensive Plan Amendment 7800 - 7822 Whitney Drive Dear Planning Commission Members: Paralegals Rebecca L. Hansen Sharlene A. Paradis Jenifer R. Shull This firm represents the Greenleaf IV Townhouse Association. The Association is comprised of 79 townhome units and is situated immediately to the north of the proposed apartment building project. If you have ever visited this Association property, you would find that it is a remarkably quiet residential area despite its very close proximity to Cedar Avenue, The Association boasts mature trees and large green spaces between the buildings, making it a desirable yet affordable neighborhood. Members of the Association received the Notice ofPublic Hearing for the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment which would rezone this area from Medium Density Residential to High Density Residential. The Association's Board of Directors asked me to write to you to voice the concerns of the Association members and their strong opposition to this amendment. Members of the Association have voiced a number of concerns regarding the proposed amendment. These concerns include the following: • The existing road design in the area are insufficient to safely and adequately handle additional traffic. • The availability of parking is limited and already a concern in the neighborhood. • The owner of the property has not adequately maintained the existing structures and there are concerns that the new, larger structure will ultimately be inadequately maintained, causing more significant aesthetic concerns. Apple valley Planning Commission May 17, 2016 Page 2 The new, larger apartment building will simply look out of place and detract from this neighborhood of single family homes, townhomes and smaller apartment buildings. From a comprehensive planning standpoint, it certainly does not make sense to insert a lone, High Density Residential parcel into an already developed Medium Density Residential neighborhood, The Association members question whether there is anything about this Y g proposed amendment that is consistent with the City's overall comprehensivelannin p g objectives. The proposed amendment appears to further no interest other than the landowner's desire to increase revenue from the property. The members of the Greenleaf IV Homeowner's Association hope that you will consider their concerns about this amendment and that the Commission will recommend that thero osed p p amendment be denied. CITY OF Apple Valley MEMO Public Works TO: Kathy Bodmer, Planner FROM: Brandon S. Anderson, City Engineer DATE: June 10, 2016 SUBJECT: Apple Villa Preliminary Plan Review Kathy, The following are comments regarding the Apple Villa Plan submitted April 8, 2016. Please include these items as conditions to approval. General 1. All work and infrastructure within public easements or right of way shall be to City standards. 2. No trees will be permitted in public easements. 3. Stormwater Pond and Infiltration Basin Construction and Maintenance Agreement will be required as part of Development Agreement. 4. Access Restriction Easement will be required along Whitney Drive as part of the Development Agreement. Provide Access Restriction Sketch and description. 5. Existing water main does not lie within the existing drainage and utility easement. Provide additional 10' easement from western line of existing D&U. 6. No construction work shall begin prior to a preconstruction meeting conference with a Public works and a Building Inspections representative. 7. Public Work Department (952-953-2400) shall be notified a minimum of 48 hours for any required water main shut downs and/or connections. 8. City of Apple Valley Water Department shall operate all valves on public owned mains and valves connecting private lines to public owned mains. 9. A Staging and temporary parking plan will be required to be submitted prior to building permit authorization. 10. See attached Memo regarding Traffic Impact Study. Permits 11. Provide a copy of the executed Minnesota Department of Health, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Met Council, Department of Labor and any other required permits prior to construction. 12. A right of way permit will be required for all work within public easements or right of way. 13. A Natural Resource Management Permit (NRNP) will be required prior to any land disturbing activity commences. Site 14. Pavement section for median cut shall match existing Whitney Drive. 15. Provide drainage and utility lines on site plan. 16. Provide Auto tum drawing indicating vehicle movements to parking garage and internal circulation of delivery trucks and garbage. 17. Pedestrian curb ramps in accordance with City of Apple Valley standards are required at sidewalk crossings of entrances. 18. Driveway entrances to be NON-RESIDENTAIL DRIVEWAY (CONCRETE ENTRANCE), Detail Plate STR-5 19. Provide 10' drainage and utility easement around the perimeter of the proposed site. Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control 20. Final Grading Plans shall be reviewed and approved by City Engineer. 21. Final Stormwater Management Plan shall be reviewed and approved by City Engineer. 22. All retaining walls over 48" from bottom of footing to the top of wall shall be designed and certified by a structural engineer and submitted to building inspections for final approval. Provide additional details and/or specifications for retaining wall block. 23. Indicate % grade on sheet C3.0 to underground parking garage. Storm Sewer 24. Final locations and sizes of Storm Sewer shall be reviewed with the final construction plans and approved by City Engineer. 25. Provide storm sewer calculations for stormwater requirements. (Rational method including Hydraulic grade lines). 26. Storm sewer within right of way and public drainage and utility easement for purposes of connection to public infrastructure shall be reinforced concrete pipe and meet all City standards. 27. Provide roof drain locations on plans. 28. Additional CB's are recommended in the drive entrance to the underground parking garage to minimize chance of trench trains overflowing to garage floor. 29. Underground storm water infiltration/detention system should be moved west to provide more separation from existing water main. 30. Trench drain on the exterior of the drive entrance to garage cannot be discharged to the interior building mechanical per building official. Relocate trench drain or discharge to an external pump. Sanitary Sewer and Water Main 31. Final locations and sizes of Sanitary Sewer and Water main shall be reviewed with the final construction plans and approved by City Engineer. 32. Provide additional drawing showing required hydrant coverage for site. 33. Additional Fire hydrants and access routes shall be provided per the Fire Marshall's recommendation. 34. All water mains located within right of way and public easements for purposes of connection to public infrastructure shall be ductile iron pipe and meet all City standards. 35. Modify standard note for the splitting of the water outside the building to graphicaly depict on the plans the two required valves outside the building for splitting the domestic and fire lines. These valves should be located as close to 1.5x height of building away from the building as possible and be readily accessible. Landcape and Natural Resources 36. Quantities and locations of trees should be indicated on plan to show diversity of species. 37. Restoration/Landscape plan should indicate required buffers and appropriate seed mixtures for infiltration area, aquatic bench and upland areas associated with any stormwater basins. 38. Landscape plan should clearly indicate drainage and utility easements and property line. 39. No major tree plantings shall be located over any underground utilities. Clusters of trees shall be used near or around these areas instead of planting in a row. The Drainage and Utility Easement will require clearance around the underground utilities, or the expectation that trees may have to be removed for access when needed. 40. Trees and shrubs planted around the infiltration areas should be above the designated HWL. 41. Additional berms and screening should be provided along Whitney Drive between the ROW and parking lot. O ETON c� M I N K, 1 N C� Consulting Engineers & Surveyors 12224 Nicollet Avenue • Burnsville, MN 55337 Phone (952) 890-0509 • Fax (952) 890-8065 www.bolton-menk.com MEMORANDUM Date: June 10, 2016 To: City of Apple Valley, MN From: Bryan T. Nemeth, P.E., PTOE Michael Boex, P.E. Subject: Traffic Impact Study Review Proposed Apartment Building: Apple Villa I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 43354 June 10, 2016 Bryan T. N • meth, P.E., PTOE Reg. No. Date Introduction The Traffic Impact Study (TIS) for the Proposed Apartment Building (Apple Villa) in Apple Valley, MN dated May 24, 2016 was reviewed to determine if and how the development impacts the traveling public. Overall, the TIS appears to be accurate. The results do not indicate any transportation concerns on an operational basis due to the development on intersections or the roadway nearby. Forecasts Trip generation forecasts are provided for the site. The TIS forecasts appear to be consistent with the Site Plan and the ITE Trip Generation Manual. The AM and PM forecasted trips appear to meet expectations and meet approved applications of practice. Public Roadway System Impacts It is anticipated that the development traffic would be primarily dispersed to Pennock Lane with some coming from or going to Cedar Avenue. The traffic increase from the development (186 trips per day) to other roadways and intersections is anticipated to be minimal as defined below. H:\APVA\ General\2016\Apple Villa Traffic Impact Study\2016-06-10_Apple Villa TIS Review.docx DESIGNING FOR A BETTER TOMORROW Bolton & Menk is an equal opportunity employer Page 2 Roadway Segment Existin g AADT AADT Increase from Development Propos ed AADT % Change in AADT Daily Roadwayto Capacity* Max Volume Capacity p y Ratio** Pennock Lane 5,100 120 5,220 2.3% 14,000 to 18,000 0.37 Whitney Drive (East of Pennock) 3,500 120 3,620 3.4% 5,000 to 10,000 0.72 Whitney Drive (East of Pennock) 3,200 60 3,260 1.9% 5,000 to 10,000 0.65 Whitney Drive (East of Pennock) 2,100 60 2,160 2.9% 5,000 to 10,000 0.43 Whitney Drive (East of Pennock) 3,100 60 3,160 1.9% 5,000 to 10,000 0.63 *Daily Roadway Capacity Range based on the Highway Capacity Manual procedures for the lanes, area type, surrounding land uses and access, and type of roadway **Based on the lower range of capacity. Actual capacity likely higher. Recent traffic volumes were collected on Whitney Drive to understand the current roadway conditions as shown on Figure 1. Truck percentages at around 3 to 3.5%, with much of the truck traffic being school buses. Generally, a volume to capacity (V/C) ratio should be less than 1.00 with a goal of less than 0.85 to allow for increases during special events and other special conditions. All of the corridors discussed above have V/C ratios less than 0.85. The change in traffic volume is also lower than 5% for all locations. Conclusions and Recommendations The development impacts are identified to be minimal in the study area due to the low volume of impact. This is confirmed with the above review. While the development impact is minimal it is noted that the traffic volume on Whitney Drive has increased by 40% since the 3/4 access was installed on Cedar Avenue. This has resulted in an increase in traffic especially apparent on the west end of Whitney, near Pennock Lane. Traffic now exiting from the area and heading north now uses Pennock Lane and accesses Cedar Avenue at 153rd Street. H:\APVA\_General\2016\Apple Villa Traffic Impact Study\2016-06-10_Apple Villa TIS Review.docx DESIGNING FOR A BETTER TOMORROW Bolton & Menk is an equal opportunity employer. 3 ack THE TRAFFIC STUDY COMPANY Technical Memorandum To: Curt Delegard From: Mike Spack, P.E., P.T.O.E. Date: May 24, 2016 Re: Traffic Review of Proposed Apartment Building 7800 Whitney Drive in Apple Valley, MN The Duane & Curtis Delegard Partnership is planning to build a 28 -unit apartment building at 7800 Whitney Drive in Apple Valley. This memorandum documents the potential traffic impact of the facility. Conclusions and Recommendations The principle findings of this technical memorandum are: • The proposed Delegard Property development is expected to generate 186 daily vehicle trips with 14 trips and 17 trips during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours, respectively. • After the apartment building is fully occupied, the adjacent Whitney Drive is expected to carry approximately 2,500 vehicles per day. This traffic volume is less than a third of Whitney Drive's capacity. Based upon the information presented in this traffic impact letter, the proposed Delegard Property project does not represent a significant impact to the surrounding roadway system and does not require a full traffic impact study. Traffic Generation A trip generation analysis performed for the development site based on the methods and rates published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition. In this case, the rates for the ITE Apartment land use are used. In addition to the ITE data, Spack Consulting has also collected data regarding traffic associated with apartments. Our internal data is structured similarly to ITE, but specifically reflects developments within the Twin Cities. Table 1 shows the estimated traffic generated by the proposed development using ITE and Spack Consulting data. Table 1 - Trip Generation Estimate Land Use — Data Source Apartments ITE Land Use Code 220 Spack Consulting Internal Data Units 28 Units Daily 186 113 AM Peak Hour Entering Exiting 3 3 11 7 PM Peak Hour Entering Exiting 11 7 6 5 The development's traffic will access Whitney Drive via the two existing driveways. According to MnDOT traffic data maps, Whitney Drive is currently carrying 2,300 vehicles per day near the site. Once the development is fully operational, Whitney Drive will carry approximately 2,500 vehicles per day. According to the Transportation Research Board of the National Academies' Highway Capacity Manual 2010, a two lane road such as Whitney Drive can accommodate approximately 8,500 to 11,500 vehicles per day before becoming congested. The traffic volumes using Whitney Drive on a daily basis after the development is fully operational will be less than a third its capacity. Spack Consulting 2 of 2 7800 Whitney Drive Traffic Review The Institute of Transportation Engineers' Transportation Impact Analyses for Site Development report recommends a detailed traffic impact study be done for developments generating 100 or more new trips in a peak hour. That is the threshold where development traffic may adversely impact the transportation system and intersection operations should be analyzed. The facility is expected to generate Tess than 20 trips in the peak hour on a typical day. This is well below the 100 trip threshold where a full traffic impact study is needed. Even if the site has quadruple the amount of traffic that's expected, it will still generate Tess traffic than would warrant a full traffic impact study that analyzed the access intersections to determine if turn lanes are needed. Therefore, a traffic impact study analyzing nearby intersection operations is not warranted for the proposed facility. City of Apple11 II Vauey ITEM: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: SECTION: 6C June 15, 2016 Land Use PROJECT NAME: PHS Cobblestone Lake Senior Housing Complex PROJECT DESCRIPTION Consideration of the following: 1. Rezoning of Lot 1, Block 1, PRESBYTERIAN HOMES AT COBBLESTONE LAKE, to Planned Development No. 703/zone 6 and Outlot A, PRESBYTERIAN HOMES AT COBBLESTONE LAKE to Planned Development No. 703/zone 7. 2. Subdivision of 16.03 acres into one (1) lot and one (1) outlot. 3. Site plan review/building permit authorization to allow for the construction of a 195 - unit continuum of care facility on a 12.28 -acre lot. STAFF CONTACT: Thomas Lovelace, City Planner DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Community Development Department APPLICANT: PHS Apple Valley Senior Housing, Inc. and South Shore Development PROJECT NUMBER: PC16-14-PZSB APPLICATION DATE: March 18, 2016 60 DAYS: 120 DAYS: Proposed Action If the Planning Commission concurs, staff is recommending the following: 1. Recommend the relocation of the public park from Oulot G, COBBLESTONE LAKE COMMERCIAL 3RD ADDITION to the north 3.75 acres of Outlot E, COBBLESTONE LAKE COMMERCIAL 3RD ADDITION. 2. Recommend approval of the rezoning of Lot 1, Block 1, PRESBYTERIAN HOMES AT COBBLESTONE LAKE from Planned Development No. 703/zone 7 and 8 to Planned Development No. 703/zone 6. 3. Recommend approval of the rezoning of Outlot A, PRESBYTERIAN HOMES AT COBBLESTONE LAKE from Planned Development No. 703/zone 8 to Planned Development No. 703/zone 7. 4. Recommend approval the PRESBYTERIAN HOMES AT COBBLESTONE LAKE preliminary plat. 5. Recommend approval of the site plan review/building permit authorization to allow for construction of a 195 -unit continuum of care facility of Lot 1, Block 1, PRESBYTERIAN HOMES AT COBBLESTONE LAKE, subject to the following conditions: a. The site plan/floor plan layout for the designated assisted living units shall be revised to reduce the number of units for compliance with the maximum allowed number of units under the Planned Development zoning regulations, unless the zoning regulations are amended to permit the number of units as proposed by the applicant. 1 b. Construction shall occur in conformance with the site plan dated June 8, 2016. c. Construction shall occur in conformance with the landscape plan dated June 8, 2016, subject to submission of a detailed landscape planting price list for verification of the City's 2%% landscaping requirement at the time of building permit application. d. Construction shall occur in conformance with the elevation plan dated June 8, 2016, subject an exterior finish consisting of at least 50% non-combustible, non- degradable and maintenance -free construction materials such as face brick or natural stone with the remainder consisting of a combination of cedar, redwood, and high quality cementitious fiberboard, sometimes referred to as "Nardi Plank/Panel". e. The canopy at the main entrance shall have a minimum clear height of 13.5 feet. f. Site grading shall occur in conformance with a final grading plan to be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer. g. Infiltration areas shall be constructed in conformance with the City standards. h. Any site lighting shall consist of downcast, shoebox lighting fixtures or wall packs with deflector shields, which confines the light to the property. Project Summary/Issues The applicant originally proposed a 175 -unit continuum of care complex on 12.28 acres that consisted of 99 independent living, 56 assisted living and 20 memory care units. The applicant has revised their plans and is now proposing a 195 -unit building with 115 assisted living, 58 assisted living, 20 memory care units and two (2) guest suites. The site is located along the east side of Cobblestone Lake Parkway, south of Embry Path and north of Elmhurst Lane. The site is currently made up of three outlots that have a variety of Comprehensive Plan land use and zoning designations. The applicant is proposing to replat the existing outlots into one (1) lot and one (1) outlot. The proposed lot will be the location of a continuum of care facility and the outlot will be dedicated as public park. Approval of amendments to the City's 2030 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map, rezoning of the property and site plan review/building permit authorization are other entitlements needed for this project. The proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments were submitted to the Metropolitan Council for their review and approval. The City received a letter from the Council, dated May 25, 2016, approving the amendments as proposed. A public park easement currently exists over and across Outlot G. A determination that the proposed relocation of park from its current location is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan will be necessary and vacation of the easement over this property will need to occur. The site plan identifies future expansion that will include an additional 64 independent living units and an 80 -bed skilled nursing facility, which will need future City review and consideration. The applicant is proposing to rezoned Lot 1, Block 1, PRESBYTERIAN HOMES AT COBBLESTONE LAKE to a subzone that would allow for the proposed continuum of care facility. 2 The applicant could rezone the lot to zone 6, which currently allows for a continuum of care retirement community, subject to the following requirements: 1. If more than one structure is used for a continuum of care retirement community, all structures shall be located on a single parcel or lot under single ownership; 2. No more than 15% of the total units provided shall be for assisted living; 3. No more than 15% of the total units provided shall be for comprehensive, intensive or full care living; and 4. The density of the total units shall not exceed 32 units per acre. The proposed project will contain twice the percentage of assisted living units currently allowed by the planned development ordinance. An amendment to the current planned development ordinance requirements in zone 6 will needed to bring the project into conformance. The original site plan indicated that the surface parking spaces would be 18 feet deep. City code requires a minimum depth of 20 feet. The code further states that if the parking space is adjacent to a curb or landscaped area, the required length can be reduced by 1.5 feet. Adjustments have been made to bring the parking spaces into conformance with code. The site has been mass graded and public utilities have been extended to serve the site. Grading of site will be needed to prepare it for development. Infiltration basins will be located to the east of the property. The site shall meet all applicable infiltration requirements. City code requires that multiple residential buildings in multi -family zoning districts have an exterior finish consisting of at least 50% non-combustible, non -degradable and maintenance -free construction materials such as face brick or natural stone, with the balance being cedar, redwood, or high quality cementitious fiberboard, sometimes referred to as "Hardi Plank/Panel". In addition, the use of vinyl, steel, aluminum siding for the exposed exterior finish shall not be allowed. Improvements to the park will include a parking lot, shelter and other amenities. As stated previously, the City has received grant funds to assist with the development of this section of Cobblestone Lake Park, which will need to occur before the end of the year. Staff would also like to see a driveway connection from the park's parking lot to the north underground parking driveway. A monument sign is shown at the main entrance into the site and a directional sign is located at the south entrance to the underground parking. No dimensioned site/construction/elevation plans have been submitted with this request. All signage shall comply with requirements set forth in the City's sign ordinance. The applicant will need to meet landscape requirements within the City's zoning ordinance, which requires that residential developments in multiple family zoning districts install landscaping (live plant material excluding sod) that will have a minimum cost of 21/2% of the estimated building construction cost based on Means Construction Data. The applicant should submit a revised plan that labels the plants and provide a detailed planting list. The applicant should consider sidewalk connections from the site to pathways in Cobblestone Lake 3 Park and from the front of the building to Cobblestone Lake Parkway. The original plans showed a five-foot wide sidewalk directly abutting the surface parking spaces. Allowing for a vehicle encroachment of 1.5 feet beyond the curb will leave only 3.5 feet of usable sidewalk area. Staff would recommend that all sidewalks that abut surface parking perpendicularly should be moved 1.5 feet from the curb or the width should be increased by a minimum of one foot. Budget Impact The City received an $896,000 Livable Communities Demonstration Account (LCDA) grant in 2011, of which $598,000 is to be used for land acquisition and utility construction for the continuum of care facility, and $298,000 for Cobblestone Lake public park improvements. Terms of the grant required that the funds be used by the December 31, 2014, which did not happen. The City did apply and received and two-year extension that will expire December 31, 2016. Attachments City Engineer's Memo Metropolitan Council Letter Resident Emails Development Plans Colored Site Plan Building Elevations Site Section Floor Plans Unit Mix/Square Footage Breakdown Google Earth Views Building Distance Map 4 COBBLESTONE LAKE CONTINUUM OF CARE COMPLEX PROJECT REVIEW Existing Conditions Property Location: At the intersection of 157th Street West and Cobblestone Lake Parkway Legal Description: Outlots E, F, and G, COBBLESTONE LAKE COMMERCIAL 3RD ADDITION Comp Plan Designation "HD" (High Density Residential/12+ units per acre), "C" (Commercial), "P" (Parks/Open Space) Zoning Classification "PD-703/zones 6, 7 and 8" (Planned Development) Existing Platting Platted as outlots Current Land Use Vacant Size: 16.03 acres Topography: Irregular Existing Vegetation Largely unkempt grasses with a manicured lawn over a small portion Other Significant Natural Features A portion of the property is part of Cobblestone Lake Park Adjacent Properties/Land Uses NORTH Cobblestone Lake North Residential Development Comprehensive Plan "LD" (Low Density Residential/2-6 units per acre) Zoning "PD-703/zone 2" (Planned Development) SOUTH Vacant Comprehensive Plan "HD" (High Density Residential/ 12+ units per acre) Zoning "PD-703/zone 8" (Planned Development) EAST Cobblestone Lake Cobblestone Lake Park Comprehensive Plan "P" (Parks/Open Space) Zoning "PD-703/zone 7" (Planned Development) WEST Cobblestone Lake Commercial Development Comprehensive Plan "C" (Commercial) Zoning "PD-703/zone 6" (Planned Development) 5 Development Project Review LOCATION MAP Background: The 16 -acre project site is comprised of three existing outlots, Outlots E, F, and G, COBBLESTONE LAKE 3RD ADDITION. In 2008, Oxford Senior Funds submitted and received approval of a development request for Outlot F. The approvals included the rezoning of the property to allow continuum of care retirement community facilities, subdivision of 10.6 acres into one (1) lot and one (1) outlot and site plan review/building permit authorization for a 214 -unit continuum of care facility on approximately 7 acres. The 3-4 story continuum of care facility would have had 152 independent living units, 32 assisted living units, and 30 memory care units, with 152 underground parking spaces, 62 surface parking spaces, and 16 surface proof -of -parking spaces. The City granted a couple of extensions to their approvals as they tried to seek financing for project. In an effort to assist the developer in getting financing, the City applied and received a $896,000 Livable Communities Demonstration Account (LCDA) grant in 2011, of which $598,000 would be used for land acquisition and utility construction for the continuum of care facility, and $298,000 for Cobblestone Lake public park improvements. Terms of the grant required that the funds be used by the December 31, 2014, which did not happen. The City applied and received a two-year extension that will expire December 31, 2016. Tradition Development, the owner of the subject property, concluded that it was unlikely that Oxford Senior Funds would be able to secure the necessary financing for the project in the timeline needed to ensure use of the grant funds. Therefore, in late 2015, they submitted a development request for amendments to the Comprehensive Plan 2030 Land Use Map, rezoning, and subdivision to allow for the 44 -lot development on 7.5 acres of an 11.5 -acre site. The remaining acreage would be used for public park. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the development request and the City Council authorized submittal of the Comprehensive Plan amendments to the Metropolitan Council. 6 The proposed amendments became bogged down at the Metropolitan Council. As Tradition Development and the City awaited a decision by the Metropolitan Council, Presbyterian Homes and Services approached Tradition with a proposal for a 4 -story continuum of care facility that would include 99 independent living, 56 assisted living, and 20 memory care units on 12.28 acres. Tradition withdrew their application for the proposed single-family residential development applicant and as the landowner, jointly submitted a development request with Presbyterian Homes & Services for the proposed continuum of care facility. Comprehensive Plan: Outlot E, COBBLESTONE LAKE COMMERCIAL 3RD ADDITION is currently designated "C" (Commercial), Outlot F, COBBLESTONE LAKE COMMERCIAL 3RD ADDITION "HD" (High Density Residential/ 12+ units per acre), and Outlot G, COBBLESTONE LAKE COMMERCIAL 3RD ADDITION "P" (Parks and Open Space). The project, with the reconfigured lot lines and proposed uses require amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The new designations for the property within the project area should be "HD" for Lot 1, Block 1, PRESBYTERIAN HOMES AT COBBLESTONE LAKE and "P" for Outlot A, PRESBYTERIAN HOMES AT COBBLESTONE LAKE. These designations would be consistent with the applicant's development proposal. On April 28, 2016, the City Council approved the submittal of the recommended Comprehensive Plan amendments to the Metropolitan Council for their review. The City received a letter, dated May 25, 2016, from the Metropolitan Council, which informed the City of their approval of the amendments as proposed. 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE MAP Zoning: The subject properties are currently located in three different subzones within Planned Development No. 703. Outlot E is located in subzone 8, which allows for gravel mining as an 7 interim use. Rezoning generally occurs in this subzone at the time of submittal and approval of development proposals. Outlot F is located in subzone 6, which allows for a variety of commercial/office/retail uses, as well as senior apartments and continuum of care facilities. Finally, Outlot G is located in subzone 7, which is designated for parks, playgrounds, recreational buildings, community centers and structures, and public utility buildings and structures. The applicant is proposing to rezoned Lot 1, Block 1, PRESBYTERIAN HOMES AT COBBLESTONE LAKE to zone 6 which allows continuum of care facilities as a permitted use, and Outlot A, PRESBYTERIAN HOMES AT COBBLESTONE LAKE to subzone 7, which that allows for parks and public buildings and structures. Subzone 6 allows for a continuum of care retirement community, subject to the following requirements: 1. If more than one structure is used for a continuum of care retirement community, all structures shall be located on a single parcel or lot under single ownership; 2. No more than 15% of the total units provided shall be for assisted living; 3. No more than 15% of the total units provided shall be for comprehensive, intensive or full care living; and 4. The density of the total units shall not exceed 32 units per acre. The applicant is proposing a 195 -unit facility, which will have 115 independent living, 58 assisted living (30%), 20 memory care units (10%), and two guest suites on a 12.28 -acre lot for a density of 16 units per acre. The applicant is proposing future phases that could include 64 additional independent living units and an 80 -bed skilled nursing facility. The additional independent living units/skilled nursing beds would lower the assisted living unit percentage to 17% and increase the comprehensive, intensive or full care living percentage to 30%. The future phases would also increase the unit density to 27 units per acre. The proposed project will contain twice the percentage of assisted living units currently allowed by the planned development ordinance. Therefore, the planned development ordinance will need to be amended or the number of assisted living units will need to be reduced. The applicant has opted for an ordinance amendment and will be submitting an application requesting an amendment to the planned development ordinance to increase the number of assisted living units from 15% to 30% of the total number of units. 8 PD -703 EDDINGTON WAY 157TH ST W 8 ZONING MAP Preliminary Plat: The proposed preliminary plat will reconfigure three existing outlots into one (1) lot and one (1) outlot. The 12.28 -acre lot will be the location of the proposed continuum of care facility and the 3.75 -acre outlot will be dedicated as public park. All applicable requirements set forth in the City's subdivision ordinance shall be adhered to. Site Plan: The original plan identified a 175 -unit continuum of care facility on a 12.28 -acre lot. The north two-thirds of the building was four stories with 99 independent living units. The south wing was 2-3 stories with the first floor occupied by 20 memory care units, and the second and third floors having 28 assisted living units each. The applicant submitted revised plans that included the addition of a 5th floor and an increase in the number of units. The revised building would have 113 independent living units, 58 assisted living units, 20 memory care units and two (2) guest suites within the same footprint. The planned development ordinance currently allows apartment and continuum of care buildings within subzone 6 to have a maximum of four stories. Therefore, approval of an ordinance amendment would be necessary to allow for the 5th floor. At the June 1, meeting, questions and concerns were raised by Commission regarding the addition of the 5th floor. Based upon those questions and concerns and need for an ordinance amendment, the applicant decided to remove the 5th floor. Revised plans have been submitted for a 195 -unit building that will have 115 independent living, 58 assisted living and 20 memory care units shows the removal of the 5th floor. In order to keep the same number of assisted living units as the June 1, proposal, the applicant has added two units to each floor of the east/west wings independent living section and one unit to each floor of the assisted living area of the building. This has extended the independent wings of the building 9 approximately 25 feet to the east and the assisted living wing approximately 10 feet to the south and west. The building will continue to meet all required building setbacks. Access to the site would be via driveways off Cobblestone Lake Parkway. The main access will be directly off the 157th Street West/Cobblestone Lake Parkway roundabout and will provide access to 110 surface parking spaces. The the most northerly driveway will provide access to the surface parking lot and 129 -space underground parking area. The third access will be located at the south end of the site and will provide a second access to the underground parking as well as service delivery and trash pickup. The construction of the two underground parking driveways will require the removal and reconfiguration of the existing curb and on street parking spaces along Cobblestone Lake Parkway. These driveways should blend seamlessly into the existing curb line along the parkway. A raised median located in Cobblestone Parkway will restrict full access from the parkway to the south driveway. A section of median at that location should be removed to allow for full access. Staff is also recommending that the parking spaces located just east of the south driveway be removed and a right turn lane be installed to accommodate delivery vehicles making a right turn onto the driveway from Cobblestone Lake Parkway. The original site plan showed 9 -ft. x 18 -ft. surface parking spaces. City code requires a minimum depth of 20 feet. The code further states that if the parking space is adjacent to a curb or landscaped area, the required length can be reduced by 1.5 feet. Adjustments have been made the parking spaces to bring them into conformance with code. This development will have 239 parking spaces (110 surface parking spaces and 129 underground parking spaces). The planned development ordinance requires a minimum of 1.1 spaces for a senior apartment and independent living units within a continuum of care facility, of which one space per unit shall be enclosed. The parking demand for the 115 independent living units and two (2) guest suites is 129 spaces, with 115 of those spaces being underground. This will leave 14 underground and 98 surface parking spaces available for the assisted living units, memory care units, guests, and staff/employees. The site plan shows future expansion that will include a four-story/64-unit independent living addition, and a two-story/80-bed skilled nursing facility and additional surface parking. The applicant has not identified any additional parking that would serve the future independent living wing. Staff expressed their concern about the direct access driveways from the skilled nursing facility's proposed parking lot to Cobblestone Lake Parkway. The revised site plan indicates the removal that driveway access. Grading and Utilities: Mass grading of the site has been completed as part of the sand and gravel mining reclamation and public utilities have been installed to serve the site. Grading of site will be needed to prepare it for development. The City Engineer has reviewed the grading and utility plans and his comments recommendations are included in an attached memo. Revisions shall be made 10 to the final grading plan and approved by the City Engineer prior to any grading activity or utility installation. Elevation Drawings: The exterior finish of the continuum of care facility will be a combination of fiber cement lap siding and shakes and manufactured veneer stone. The primary materials will be the lap siding and shakes, and a manufactured stone veneer, with a pre -finished metal soffit and fascia. City code requires that multiple residential buildings in multi -family zoning districts have an exterior finish consisting of at least 50% non-combustible, non -degradable and maintenance -free construction materials such as face brick or natural stone, with the balance being non -manufactured natural construction material such as plank cedar or redwood. This building is located in a planned development -zoning district, which has some specific requirements for exterior finishes on all buildings within the development. This includes restricting the use of artificial siding such as aluminum and vinyl, and requiring that buildings share a design theme. The petitioner has stated that the mix of materials and material percentages are in keeping with the overall theme of the Cobblestone Lake development exterior finishes. This project is also subject to specific performance standards set the in the planned development ordinance for apartments and continuum of care buildings. They include the following: • All exterior elevations shall have a vertical exposed exterior finish that shall consist of a combination of non-combustible materials such as brick, stone, stucco, and the like. The use of cedar, redwood, and high quality cementitious fiberboard, sometimes referred to as "Hardi Plank/Panel" may be used when incorporated with before -mentioned non- combustible materials. • Metal skins materials, such as baked enamel, stainless steel, aluminum sandwich panels as the like as primary field materials for buildings shall not be permitted. This type of material may be used as a design element. • The use of vinyl, steel, aluminum siding for the exposed exterior finish shall not be allowed. A canopy with a 12 -foot clear height will be constructed at the facility's main entrance. The canopy's height should have a clear height of 13.5 feet to better accommodate emergency vehicles. Approval of the building elevations shall be subject to the adhering to the City's applicable general code and planned development ordinance requirements. Landscape Plan: The landscape plan indicates a variety of deciduous trees, evergreens, shrubs, and annuals/perennial plantings. The applicant will need to meet landscape requirements within the City's zoning ordinance, which requires that residential developments in multiple family zoning districts install landscaping (live plant material excluding sod) that will have a minimum cost of 21/2% of the estimated building construction cost based on Means Construction Data. The applicant will need to submit a landscape plan that labels the plants and a detailed planting list for review and approval by City staff prior to issuance of a building permit. 11 Pedestrian Access: The applicant is proposing a sidewalk connection from the front of the building to the sidewalk adjacent to Cobblestone Lake Parkway. Staff recommended sidewalk connections from the site to pathways in Cobblestone Lake Park and from the front of the building to Cobblestone Lake Parkway. The sidewalk connections to the parkway have been made and they have extended a sidewalk connection to the east property line, which abuts Cobblestone Lake Park. The original plans indicated a five-foot wide sidewalk directly abutting the surface parking spaces. Allowing for a vehicle encroachment of 1.5 feet beyond the curb will leave only 3.5 feet of usable sidewalk area. Staff recommended that all sidewalks abutting the surface parking should be moved 1.5 feet from the curb or the width should be increased by a minimum of one foot. The applicant has increased the sidewalks by a foot. Parks/Recreation Issues: Outlot G, COBBLESTONE LAKE COMMERCIAL 3RD ADDITION was expected to be dedicated for public park purposes once development was completed on the abutting outlots to the north and south. The applicant is proposing to incorporate a portion of Outlot G into their lot to relocate the parkland to the north in Outlot E. They indicate there will be no net loss with this land swap. The Apple Valley's Park and Recreation Advisory Committee reviewed the proposed change and did not have any outstanding issues. The City currently holds an easement over this property for public park purposes. In order to complete the land exchange as proposed, the City is required to first determine if releasing the current easement area from being a park is consistent with the Comp Plan. This finding is to be made by the Planning Commission. If the Planning Commission that the relocation of the park as proposed is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, The City Council will need to conduct a public hearing on the vacation of a portion of the easement over Outlot G. Improvements to the park will include a parking lot, shelter and other amenities similar to what was proposed in Outlot G. As stated previously, the City has received grant funds to assist with the development of this section of Cobblestone Lake Park, which will need to occur before the end of the year. Staff would like to see a driveway connection from the park's parking lot to the north underground parking driveway. Signs: A monument sign is shown at the main entrance into the site and service sign is located at the south entrance to the underground garage. No dimensioned site/construction/elevation plans have been submitted with this request. All signage shall comply with requirements set forth in the City's sign ordinance. Lighting Plan: No lighting plan has been submitted with this development proposal. The City code requires that any lighting used to illuminate an off-street parking area or sign shall be arranged so as to deflect light away from any adjoining residential zone or from the public streets. Direct glare from floodlights or similar sources, shall not be directed into any adjoining property or public streets, and all the source of all lights shall be hooded or controlled in some manner so as not to light adjacent property. Mitigative measures shall be employed to limit glare and spill light 12 to protect neighboring parcels and to maintain traffic safety on public roads. These measures shall include lenses, shields, louvers, prismatic control devices and limitations on the height and type of fixtures. The city may also limit the hours of operation of outdoor lighting if it is deemed necessary to reduce impacts on the surrounding neighborhood. Public Hearing: The public hearing was held on April 20, 2016. The hearing was opened, comments were taken, and the hearing closed. The following is a synopsis of the comments received during the public hearing along with staffs or the applicant's response. A comment was received regarding the height of the building stating that looking up at a four-story building from Cobblestone Lake will actually look like a six -story building. Staff Response — Their currently is a twelve foot change in elevation from the pond's shoreline to the edge of the development site. The site then rises 10 feet from east to west. The building's first floor elevation will be 936 and the building will be 68.5 feet tall. The building will be located approximately 200 feet from the Cobblestone Lake pathways so the height will be diminished by the distance from the public park to the east. A question was raised regarding the color of the building. Staff Response — The applicant will provide a color palette on June 1. How will service delivery vehicles access the site? Staff Response —Access by service delivery vehicles and trash pickup will be via the private driveway located at the south side of the building. This driveway will intersect with Cobblestone Lake Parkway South. Parkway modifications will be made that include removal of a section of median and a minimum of four recessed parking spaces in the parkway. The removal of the median will allow for full vehicular access in and out of the site at the location. A question was asked if we need more senior apartments. Staff Response — In 2013, Maxfield Research, Inc. prepared a report for the Dakota Community Development Agency (CDA) entitled "Comprehensive Housing Needs Assessment for Dakota County, Minnesota ". The report found that "Apple Valley has 72 units of age -restricted housing targeted to seniors with very low in- comes (<50% of AMI). The City also has three age -restricted CDA properties (independent living) targeted to moderate -income seniors. Combined, these three properties total 170 units and are fully occupied. Apple Valley has a total of 176 adult/few services units and 315 units of service -enriched senior housing among five properties. The service -enriched properties offer a continuum of care including independent living with optional services, assisted living and memory care. Occupancies at all age -restricted properties in Apple Valley remain high (average of 95% or higher) ". The report estimated that the projected demand for senior housing units in Apple Palley from 2010 to 2030 are the following: • Rental senior affordable = 415 units • Rental senior market rate w/services = 540 units • For -sale senior market rate = 525 units 13 The City recently gave preliminary approval to a 163 -unit senior apartment building, located at the southwest corner of Cedar Avenue and 140th Street West. The developer is proceeding with their final approvals and would likely begin construction late this year or early next. That still leaves a need for 1,317 senior units over the next 15 years. A concern was raised regarding the proposed parking. Staff Response — The proposed development will have 110 surface and 113 underground parking spaces to serve 193 units. There are also 52 on street parking spaces along the east and north side of Cobblestone Lake Parkway that can provide additional parking for the development. A question was raised if the park would be handicap accessible. Staff Response — The park will be constructed in compliance with federal ADA requirements and National Recreation and Park Association standards. Concerns were raised regarding the building size, massing, and height of the building. Staff Response — The applicant is proposing to construct a 3-4 story building on a 12.28 -acre lot. The building will be approximately 59 feet tall, which is 10 feet lower than the maximum height allowed in subzone 6 of the planned development. The proposed building will occupy approximately 15% of the lot. If the project is expanded with the addition of the 64 independent units and 80 -bed skilled nursing facility, the building coverage will increase to 24%. 14 CITY OF Apple11 MEMO Public Works TO: Tom Lovelace, Planner FROM: Brandon S. Anderson, City Engineer DATE: June 10, 2016 SUBJECT: PHS Cobblestone Lake Senior Housing Preliminary Plan Review Tom, The following are comments regarding the PHS Cobblestone Lake Senior Housing Plan submitted June 08, 2016. Please include these items as conditions to approval. General 1. No trees will be permitted in public easements. 2. Stormwater Pond and Infiltration Basin Construction and Maintenance Agreement will be required as part of Development Agreement. 3. Design of public infrastructure to serve park shall be coordinated with PHS Cobblestone Lake plans. 4. The developer shall identify whether site utilities will be installed under private or public contract. 5. A Traffic Control Plan shall be submitted and approved for all lane and street closures by the contractor. Flag persons shall be provided as necessary. 6. A detour plan will be required as part of final construction plans for the construction of streets and utilities within Cobblestone Lake Parkway. An obstruction permit may be required by Dakota County for use of County roadways as part of detour. 7. No construction work shall begin prior to a preconstruction meeting conference with a Public works and a Building Inspections representative. 8. Public Work Department (952-953-2400) shall be notified a minimum of 48 hours for any required water main shut downs and/or connections. 9. City of Apple Valley Water Department shall operate all valves on public owned mains and valves connecting private lines to public owned mains. 10. Provide Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment in accordance with Metropolitan Livable Communities Act Grant Agreement (SGO1 1-143) Permits 11. Provide a copy of the executed Minnesota Department of Health, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Met Council, Department of Labor and any other required permits prior to construction. 12. A right of way permit will be required for all work within public easements or right of way. 13. A Natural Resource Management Permit (NRNP) will be required prior to any land disturbing activity commences. Site 14. Pavement section for median cut shall match existing Cobblestone Lake Parkway South. 15. Pedestrian curb ramps in accordance with City of Apple Valley standards are required at sidewalk crossings of entrances. 16. Provide pedestrian crossing including ADA ramps and striping on east side of main entrance at the round -a -bout. 17. On Sheet C1.02, show truck movement entering site from roundabout and proceeding directly to canopy and back out to ensure vehicle can maneuver directly to front entrance. 18. Include Auto turn for service vehicles from Cobblestone Lake Parkway to loading ramp in rear of building. 19. Height on canopy needs to be indicated on plans as 13'6" to accommodate emergency vehicles. 20. Lengthen taper on turn lane entrance from Cobblestone Lake Parkway to the service entrance. 21. Provide additional crosswalk markings for sidewalk connection at the north end of the parking lot. 22. Additional detail describing the number of service vehicle types, residents and guests are required to be included in the provided Traffic Trip Generation memo. Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control 23. Final Grading Plans shall be reviewed and approved by City Engineer. 24. Final Stormwater Management Plan shall be reviewed and approved by City Engineer. 25. Provide the overall site composite Curve Number (CN) along with the impervious % on the area tabulation (sheet C3.01). 26. The NWL, 100 -year HWL and EOF should be indicated on plan sheets for storm water pond and infiltration basins. Hydraulic calculations shall be approved by the City Engineer. 27. Identify elevations of openings on C3.01 to ensure that EOF's are 1.0' below lowest openings. 28. Identify parking lot EOF elevation. 29. The infiltration basins should be identified by numbers (1-X) and calculations provided. 30. All retaining walls over 48" from bottom of footing to the top of wall shall be designed and certified by a structural engineer and submitted to building inspections for final approval. Provide additional details and/or specifications for retaining wall block. 31. Sheet C2.01 — infiltration basins should not be used as temporary sediment basin as indicated and should be left offline until site is stabilized. 32. Consider adding a curb cut in the service vehicle hammer handle to direct additional stormwater to Infiltration basin. 33. In accordance with Metropolitan Livable Communities Act Grant Agreement (SGO1 1 - 143) Storm water management shall adhere to: a. Federal and state laws relating to stormwater discharges including, without limitation, any applicable requirements of Code of Federal Regulations, title 40, parts 122 and 123 and b. The Council's 2030 Water Resources Management Policy Plan and the local water management plan for the jurisdiction with which the redevelopment side is located. Storm Sewer 34. Final locations and sizes of Storm Sewer shall be reviewed with the final construction plans and approved by City Engineer. 35. Provide storm sewer calculations for stormwater requirements. (Rational method including Hydraulic grade lines). 36. Storm sewer within right of way and public drainage and utility easement for purposes of connection to public infrastructure shall be reinforced concrete pipe and meet all City standards. 37. Confirm storm sewer connection elevations and direction of flow at STMH 10 to the NW at the future park parking lot. 38. FES2 and STMH 2 should be relocated to prevent short circuiting and promote longer retention in proposed infiltration pond. Sanitary Sewer and Water Main 39. Final locations and sizes of Sanitary Sewer and Water main shall be reviewed with the final construction plans and approved by City Engineer. 40. All water mains located within right of way and public easements for purposes of connection to public infrastructure shall be ductile iron pipe and meet all City standards. 41. Remove Hydrant at the rear center of the building and water main from this hydrant to the hydrant at the service "hammer handle". A public water main along the proposed north park border will support a hydrant near the park path for fire department usage for the NW quadrant of the site. Update hydrant coverage map to reflect changes. 42. Domestic water and Fire service shall be split outside the building and the valves shall be located 1.5 times the height of the building away from the building or placed in location readily accessible per SER -6 sheet C9.01. 43. Identify Irrigation service location(s) if applicable per SER -4 sheet C9.01. Landcape and Natural Resources 44. Quantities and locations of trees should be indicated on plan to show diversity of species. 45. Restoration/Landscape plan should indicate required buffers and appropriate seed mixtures for infiltration area, aquatic bench and upland areas associated with any stormwater basins. 46. Landscape plan should clearly indicate drainage and utility easements and property line. 47. No major tree plantings shall be located over any underground utilities. Clusters of trees shall be used near or around these areas instead of planting in a row. The Drainage and Utility Easement will require clearance around the underground utilities, or the expectation that trees may have to be removed for access when needed. 48. Trees and shrubs planted around the infiltration areas should be above the designated HWL. 49. Identify specifications of Infiltration Planting mix on the plans 50. Identify seed mixtures utilized on the plans 51. Indicated whether turfed areas will be irrigated or not. d Thomas Lovelace, City Mamie Page 2 May 25, 1016 The amendment, explanatory materials, and the information submission torrn will be appended to the City's Plan in the Council's files. llyou have any questions please contact Raya Esmaeili, Principal Reviewer, at 651-602-1616. Since Lis eth Barajas, nager Local Planning A sistance CC: Steve O'Brien, Minnesota Housing Tod Sherman, Development Reviews Coordinator, MnDO Wendy Wulff, Metropolitan Council District 16 Patrick Boylan, Sector Representative Raya Esmaeili, Principal Reviewer / Rev iews Coordinator tro (-"ottiniDevIPA,CommunttlesvIpple IalleylLetkrs'Apple 1 alley 2016 CPA Cobblestone Outlots E F G 20.591-16 1chm, Revseo docx RECEIVED VA( 3 \ Lovelace, Tom From: Sent: To: Subject: Murphy, Joan Friday, June 10, 2016 3:43 PM Lovelace, Tom FW: Proposed "PHS Cobblestone Lake Senior Housing Complex" From: Tracie Henkel Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 3:38 PM To: Murphy, Joan Subject: Proposed "PHS Cobblestone Lake Senior Housing Complex" Dear Planning Commission Members: I learned that Presbyterian Homes submitted plans for your review for a 5 -story Continuum of Care Complex that would be located on the west end of Cobblestone Lake. Although I have only positive thoughts about services offered at other Presbyterian Homes locations, I do not favor this proposal for two reasons: the proposed 4 or 5 -story complex would tower over all existing structures and it would be a significant departure from the original plan for the location of a park on the west end of the lake. I moved to the Cobblestone Lake neighborhood three years ago specifically because of the beautiful city park and walking paths around Cobblestone Lake. The lake creates a wonderful sense of community where I meet and visit with other dedicated dog owners who walk the paths multiple times a day -- especially at sunrise and sunset to take in the amazing colors reflected on the lake. The beautiful park also draws in my friends from Rosemount and other parts of Apple Valley. Besides people using the paths, young and old people fish on the lake year-round, adding to the sense of a valued community gathering place. Of course a care facility would be a great addition to Apple Valley; however, the proposed facility is simply too large and moves the park off to the north, changing the planned vista of green space. I urge the Planning Commission to consider the wishes of the people who currently reside in the neighborhood and bought their homes with views of the lake in mind. I hope the developer will find an alternative plan that will better satisfy the needs and desires of the entire community. Sincerely, Tracie Henkel Dunberry Way Apple Valley, MN 1 Lovelace, Tom From: Sent: To: Subject: Murphy, Joan Friday, June 10, 2016 3:30 PM Lovelace, Tom FW: Presbyterian Home Proposal Original Message From: Paula Finkelstein Sent: Friday, June 10, 20th 3:29 PM To: Murphy, Joan Subject: Presbyterian Home Proposal As residents of the Cobblestone Lake Neighborhood we would like to state our opposition and dismay with the proposed change in plans for the new Presbyterian Home. I found the last discussed change from 3 to 4 stories uncomfortable from an esthetic standpoint. Now to hear that a 5 story structure has been proposed is of serious concern to us and frankly unacceptable. It will be unsightly in its new location (moved to center stage) and totally dwarf the rest of the neighborhood. This building as it is proposed will not be an enhancement to our community ; it will devour it. We are extremely supportive of having a seniors facility in our community. It will enrich and diversify our neighborhood. Please keep the structure as initially proposed at 3 stories. It ultimately will be in the best interest of all concerned parties. Sincerely, Paula and Bert Finkelstein 15584 Dunberry Way Apple Valley man 55124 Sent from my iPad 1 Lovelace, Tom From: Sent: To: Subject: Murphy, Joan Friday, June 10, 2016 2:48 PM Lovelace, Tom FW: Cobblestone Lake Presbyterian Homes Development Original Message From: . Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 2:47 PM To: Murphy, Joan Subject: Cobblestone Lake Presbyterian Homes Development Hi there, I just wanted to take a moment to express my concerns about the new housing development being planned by Presbyterian Homes in Cobblestone Lake. The idea of a 4 story building was already extremely hard to stomach, but I just heard they are proposing a change to 5 stories! For those of us who own homes in this community, the idea of having our nice sunset lake view being blocked by a tall residential building is extremely upsetting. I hope the city will really think about the current residents of Cobblestone Lake when making this decision. I think this will severely impact the quality and desirability of our neighborhood. I understand the need for senior housing, but it shouldn't come at a cost to others in the community. Thank you for your time and please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jennifer Winward 1 Lovelace, Tom From: Sent: To: Subject: From: Jim McGuirk Murphy, Joan Friday, June 03, 2016 11:23 AM Lovelace, Tom FW: Presbyterian Homes Project Sent: Friday, June 03, 2016 11:13 AM To: Murphy, Joan Subject: Fwd: Presbyterian Homes Project Good Morning, I'm writing to share my concerns with the latest revision to the Presbyterian Homes project on Cobblestone Lake. The revision to the project only adds to my concerns. I was initially concerned with the height and overall mass of the building. This revision increases the height of the building to 68.5 feet, an 11% increase. So tall that it will require an exemption to current rules in the area. In addition, by building on land 12 feet higher than the lake, it exacerbates the height issue. Please do not consider exempting this project from existing height t rules. My second largest concern is the overall mass of the building. I agree strongly with the original plan for the neighborhood entrance. This included two lots on either side of a public park. One single buildingis too massive, moves the park to a less desirable location, and may completely block the lake view from the entrance. Two lots flanking a park is better than one large lot. Please do not move the park. I don't believe that a building with a footprint the size of a Super Target and as high as 5 stories tall in some places belongs on the entrance to our lake. I'm also concerned that the plan continues to ignore standing city requirements such as the percentages and . p g number of each type of unit, percentage of non-combustible and non -degradable building materials, and now, height. Thank you for reading. Jim McGuirk 15 622 Eddington Way 1 Lovelace, Tom From: Sent: To: Subject: Murphy, Joan Friday, June 03, 2016 11:44 AM Lovelace, Tom FW: Presbyterian Homes project Original Message From: Catherine Rauchwarter Sent: Friday, June 03, 2016 11:42 AM To: Murphy, Joan Subject: Presbyterian Homes project As a new resident of Cobblestone ,I am very concerned about land use being discussed for the remaining property surrounding Cobblestone Lake. I would like to have another public meeting on this very substantial piece of land that would impact all of the residents of Cobblestone. Cathy Rauchwarter Sent from my iPad 1 Lovelace, Tom From: Sent: To: Subject: Murphy, Joan Friday, June 03, 2016 11:24 AM Lovelace, Tom FW: Cobblestone lake development. From: nicolle nicklas Sent: Friday, June 03, 2016 11:1/ AM To: Murphy, Joan Subject: Cobblestone lake development. I was just informed there has been some significant changes to the development of the West side of the lake. Changes that include increasing the building footprint and height. Also the park that was planned. There needs to be another meeting regarding these issues and the residents of Cobblestone Lake need more information on this project. Concerned Resident. Nicolle Nicklas MS. CRNA (763)439-7831 1 Lovelace, Tom From: Sent: To: Subject: Murphy, Joan Thursday, June 09, 2016 2:03 PM Lovelace, Tom FW: PHS Cobblestone Lake Senior Housing Development: Feedback From: Jon Laqua Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2016 1:57 PM To: Grawe, Charles; Murphy, Joan Subject: PHS Cobblestone Lake Senior Housing Development: Feedback Mayor Hamann -Roland and Mr. Tom Lovelace, I'm writing in regards to the proposed PHS Cobblestone Lake Senior Housing Development project within the Cobblestone Lake development. As residents of the neighborhood, my wife and I have three concerns about the revised plans recently submitted to the Planning Commission. What drew us to Cobblestone Lake (ultimately becoming the deciding factor in our moving here) was the neighborhood's character. The architecture, the houses with porches in the front and garages in the back, and of course the lake which we walk around every day. The overall design of the neighborhood demonstrates a vision that makes Cobblestone Lake a highly desirable place to call home. My wife and I attended the Senior Housing Development project's public hearing on April 19th and were pleased to learn about the plans for senior housing to be added to the neighborhood. The idea of senior housing was met with enthusiasm by those at the meeting. There was even interest from several attendees who inquired about a potential waiting list for the facility. But the consensus was that the (at that time) four story proposal was too large, and was met with 100% apprehension. We now see that the recently submitted revised plan is a story higher, making the building five stories. Walking around the lake would mean walking in the shadow of this mega -structure. It would be the focalp oint of the lake, blocking the amazing sunsets we see today. You couldn't help but feel small when walking around the lake. At 92' 6" above the lake this building is far too tall for the neighborhood. From the lake you would look up at a 9+ story behemoth above you, blocking out the sun. Even at 85' 6" (the original four story design) the building would be too large, towering 8 1/2 stories above the lake. To be blunt, this proposed structure would not only dominate the lake shore; it would conflict with the neighborhood's character. Second, based on the drawings submitted the building looks nothing like the existing architecture in Cobblestone Lake. All existing buildings (single familyhomes, townhomes, higher density � townhomes and amenities) have a look, feel and color palette which this building completely contradicts. Considering it's proximity to the lake and the surrounding neighborhoods it should look like it belongs in the neighborhood; like it was planned to be there from day one. The current design instead looks like just another run-of-the-mill sprawling apartment complex, plopped down with no regard for the surrounding environment. 1 Again, being blunt, this design doesn't match its surrounding environment at all. It just doesn't fit. And finally, the need to re -zone and move the planned community park will impact the feel of the neighborhood. That park was meant to be a welcoming invitation to Cobblestone Lake from the shopping area, inviting the public to enjoy the lake and amenities. Shuffling the park off to the side makes it nothing more than an after -thought while the massive building walls off the lake. As designed this project demands too many compromises and does too much damage to the neighborhood. Patti and I implore you to stay true to the Cobblestone Lake vision and wait for a design that demonstrates a situational awareness while complementing the Cobblestone Lake development. Perhaps a little "thinking outside the box" is required in this situation. Because if done right, the addition of senior housing would be the finishing touch for Cobblestone Lake, the crown jewel if you will, making Cobblestone Lake even more desirable than it is today. Respectfully, Jon and Patti Laqua 15641 Cobblestone Lake Parkway Apple Valley, MN 55124 2 Lovelace, Tom From: Sent: To: Subject: Murphy, Joan Thursday, June 09, 2016 10:02 AM Lovelace, Tom; Nordquist, Bruce FW: PHS COBBLESTONE LAKE SENIOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL From: Cynthia Falkowski Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2016 10:00 AM To: Murphy, Joan Subject: PHS COBBLESTONE LAKE SENIOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL TO THE ATTENTION OF: Bruce Nordquist : Community Development Director Tom Lovelace: City Planner Apple Valley Planning Commision: Tom Melander Tim Burke David Schindler Ken Alwin Keith Diekmann Angela Polozun Paul Scanlan As residents of The Harbor At Cobblestone Lake South Shore Homeowners Association, we submit the following in regard to your June 1st Planning Commission meeting for the rezoning/replat of the existing outlots, for the the purpose of expanding the scope of the proposed Presbyterian Housing project: Tradition Development developed and successfully marketed the Cobblestone Lake community in the manner detailed in the brochure to be found at the following website: http://www.cobbiestonelake.comilifestyle.asp Following are a few key notes from the above noted brochure: Cobblestone Lake offers the nostalgia and stability of old-fashioned traditional neighborhoods. Take a stroll down the sidewalks, through the neighborhoods and see the attention given to detail. With front porches on every home and a streetscape that is painted with landscaping, your walk will through the neighborhood will be one reminiscent of yesteryear. Cobblestone Lake has set itself apart from any other new neighborhood through its careful design, construction and attention detail all of which is evident as you make your way through the neighborhood and down to the lake or any one of the other multiple amenities. The neighborhood surrounds the centerpiece lake which is also completely encompassed by parks and dual lighted trails and pathways so everyone can enioy the setting. 1 The future will also include additional amenities as plans are currently being developed which will complete the parks and trails system within the community. Future parks will include the addition of a picnic shelter, complete with site furniture, grills, landscaping and restroom facility. Our particular Association consists primarily, if not exclusively, of empty -nesters who downsized to smaller high-quality homes, specifically choosing Cobblestone Lake for reasons outlined by Tradition. The park area on the west end of the lake has been promised to include the facilities detailed above, and has been illustrated on every drawing from the earliest conception of this development. We have asked numerous times when it would be completed, each time being reassured that as the economy improved, it would be brought to fruition. Now that the lake lots have been sold, boasting beautiful new homes, we all assumed the remaining park would soon be completed, as promised. The introduction of the proposed Presbyterian Home project was acceptable as originally presented three stories, to be located on either side of the park. However, to expand the structure(s) to cover the west end of the lake, and construct it as a looming 5 -story building, will completely re -shape and re -define the whole of Cobblestone Lake and its neighborhoods. Such an imposing presence will destroy the atmosphere we treasure and enjoy daily as the biking and walking paths are constantly in use. I'm wondering if you have walked the paths of Cobblestone, complete with its parks, gazebo, beautiful dock, the wide variety of tasteful and interesting homes, canoe stations and more. This is indeed the concept as presented by Tradition Development, which has successfully fostered a unique blend of residents, each of which purchased in Cobblestone because of these offerings. You cannot have an entire community built on the promises put forth to each of us in the cited brochure, then change the plan once residential portion has effectively built out. To place a 5 -story, massive building on a small lake with 2 -story homes will not only look ridiculous, but almost certainly have a negative impact on the value of our homes. In closing, we strongly oppose any 5 -story structure on the shores of Cobblestone Lake, let alone one which will be located where we have all been promised a large park and the accompanying park amenities. A hard -copy of this correspondence will also be delivered to the Apple Valley City Hall. Thank you for your attention in this matter. Jon and Cynthia Falkowski - 15841 Eastbend Way Dennis and Kathy Hansen - 15829 Eastbend Way Lynn and BernaDene Reimer - 15849 Eastbend Way Dan and Jann Cotroneo 15857 Eastbend Way Luther and Libby Hagen - 15843 Cobblestone Lake Parkway John and Nancy Varpness - 15851 Cobblestone Lake Parkway Robert and Kathleen Kachman - 15859 Cobblestone Lake Parkway Les and Cyndy Martisko - 15867 Cobblestone Lake Parkway 2 W03.00AUDWAAMAA Cll. NW In,/ .45 AA 9C ADWA e.94 sect oni abflIVNOS ,390. •NNAVAA .VIOSAINNUN 11.ViS SmY1 M1.11.1 N.N91431VNOISSAIONdoasneon A1110 V WV 11.101AV Norivoiuris lama MN ARUM NO NW AN ONNVANAA 1.04321 .NOUVDINO3AS AVId ANNN3A1 I INDEX OF DRAWINGS LLJ LD w z z 0 I- 0 = UJ > CC 1:9 1-4 Z uuJ (f) Lfl g z 2 g .1.3HS b3AOD NW 'AT11VA 31ddY 3IV1 31101.91900D SHd PROJECT DIRECTORY 1-11d(iiNOINVCI -3:74:7AtagtvaigliiTPWA •ox"Tru g:a= 6,•1000£6VC013£61 \ CANCONC61,8,4DoINA9 . EXISTING TOPOGRAPHIC SYMBOLS WOD'DOWD,AWA MS, NW rod 'IS M 9E AD^W6!H SEEL 3a4uei.s GRADING INFORMATION EXISTING TOPOGRAPHIC LINES SURVEY SYMBOLS .......................... w Y 3 z w u ¢mZa6°L 3����gwJ z m u g gn 3 w z z Z W W W W W W Q J u v u v u u� w Z Z Z Z Z¢ Q W: � lWL LL LL LL lWL LLw. O F ABBREVIATIONS oN 31, 31v0 •38f:dNO1S A32iHdWf1H a3902i 3WdN 1NI8d ,i053NNIW d0 31dLS 3H130 SM vI 3H1 M3ON0 N33NI9N3 1dN01S9J0.03.3. AlOG d Wv 11vH1 ONd Nq$IAb3d(iS 103 MIC Aw 330N0 MO 3W A9 038 vd3Md SVM 130438 MO' NOI1d7H1�3dSNdld SIH11vH1 A31133J A0383H I SN0IlVU932199V aNY GN3931 NW 'X311VA 9lddd � 1V1 DNO19188OD SHd a w w O 11 _ 8 9 p J8 wWa e j J o w u 611 88 ¢ UU r U Z W6WWg JE OL�CCZiJi 0NwQ 2WIA2POLTHIJW:MilM41111fii WW L Up¢029Wpp22 Z Vt�� 8 �c U ' 1u Q m m, d g OU q w 1�.1 11 J LL u O C7 i � J . X s- f �z a a, n , a U 5 U vi F¢- U Z U E 5� a n: a � to an t- F_ � > 3 w � 3 3 z 6 w w w tj w > � � z � � z ,(5,14 °m U 2 d Y- 6 a ZS d vl d in 0 2 8 ytW1 VI aO U 8 F2 Z N J W ¢ lui F- w w w w w w a Z a a a g g S g S a a El PROPOSED TOPOGRAPHIC SYMBOLS STORM SEWER APRON 2 9 a m BARRICADE PERMANENT CATCH BASIN BEEHIVE T 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I II EXISTING UTILITY LINES RR CROSSING GATE . • e LL 9 U 9 6 STORM SEWER FLARED END SECTION ■ I ll i 171 PROPOSED UTILITY LINES I I n1 6 11I I ^ I LL I I ^ 8 1 LL IT O F- Q Z Q Y � Q w J O C e'jJ V Z J a 2 / to 1 a � J 3 0 0 2 U 6 x 2 1 1�.1 �Tl O 2 HYDRANT PVMNT MARKER(REFLECTOR) we rf • 8 6 INLET (SMALL DIA.) SPRINKLER VALVE BOX LIFT STATION CONTROL PANEL LIFT STATION DRY WELL JI 2 ° w 2 z � S 5 w w w s 8 9 2 2 SERVICE -STORM SEWER POINT ON LINE SERVICE -WATER POINT ON LINE FUTURE UTILITY LINES z 8 9 6 6 O 3 6 2 6 9 9 6 N� 6 HATCH PATTERNS CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS O z 8 N Wg z O o U 95 U O Q u m ¢ J J J J QUm¢ 6666 Q J J J J�� Cll W Q U m¢ JLL JLL 5L _LLl I - w J J J J J J J J 6 6 w U m¢¢ `_ ¢¢ w2 W aaaGa 0 o¢¢¢¢ aaaa¢¢ZZzZ 0ow556,6,2,a9999w 89 8 888888999 1 I I O C C G ol . U 1 I 1 o c c w W w 0 u ct 1 O U (n c: v � o Ui C 222 C tY 9 QaLL a � � U O C c. ;A m p 6 le m f 9 p 6 J x Pm f z w � Y a� ,` c, 3 `8' Y o sz Iy21 LL9I Q u c� a IsI-- LLL W � Q Q Lx (y) e, C,v :J a NiUUNEUd Si :Ji1N V11 AB UiIW JH111 V 1`/Nl N V Hl M3H10 3$04004 ANb MOd 3Sf1 d0 NglD0000d30 '1]1N v1$ i0 At33d Odd 3N1 33. SONIM': eG UNb $N:JIS3O llv Ol StN018Ad00 3H: AM301f10HLM 031Nv1S 01 03130430 3911VHS SNOMSIwO 00 530083 ANv • ON4nv00 3H; 3?vOS lON DD 'SN01SN3WIG llY 30i 37915NOdS30 38 ONv AiW3A l?dHS MOlD v01N00 3Ht O80Xf6►E00£61 ':Slay 6.1,009£6Y£00£61\6M0\Ov0\£6Y£OB£61\anµ�D\0£61`.A:awou 47z,C wo9L�6 - 9 t07,/00/90 :8700 Jaid Et NW In,' 4u1oS 9E AID,ALle. IseM SEEZ ..1140 lood 'IS ,AWei ;WC d10 0,1963, NA,Nda Aft A3A,113 31,1C1 VIO.NNVI ,311VA 31d. SS38C1OV XXXX Agnans 1iI1 ONV1 SdSN/V11V 011 "IN91A1c1013A3C1 980HSH1110S LAND DESCRIPTION CERTIFICATION MAY 4, 2016 Nn1 11CCV Hie ♦♦� ,\)nth; IYVIIIVV Y Ill CJ J(�V/ I.i 71fOS DIV -1 31N0153 12803 1 OLLICC1 f i 3 dCHS HInos 3>I Y 1 3NC LS3 e8cX H.. EL 1,09 LuoJ'Daiuois'MMM EI ISS Nw 1.6 'IS m 9E /omt.AH SEE, ai.ue�s ON Oil .31V0 ddf11VNOIS A NdWt1H a3�O21 aNVN 1NIad 'V1O53NNIw 3O 31VIS 3H1 i0 SMV13H1 83ONf1 N33NfOt.13 TI2'34 dOM 03SN3O11 A7f1O V WV I iv. ONV NOIS'Nnd dfIS lO3MI0 AW 1130.11 2lO 3. A9 O321Vd3dd SVM Od3N NO'NOIlV0I3IO3dS'NVid SIHl 1VHl A411.0 A93213H I NVld 3118 NW 'AJ11VA �lddb' DSIV] NOIST188OD SHd 2 Z O 2 2 8 2 �o 08 N 50 8 V O Z 9 O Z U 4 ! R!k RJO C! A b 1 i 9■ N B i i bf� �l i1 • • '.340181103 51 O31NS'15 AS o311MOHNV 1 NOfiJ(10O11d3u'O31NV15 i0 A1H3dO7ld 3r�13dV S`JNIM 'A V13C IftOHIIM J31Nv1S Ot 031aOd3b 38 171 3N7 31vJS tON O0'SNOISN3w14 llv MOi 31B15NOd� VAR:44N'tl MO3 3S� MOSW'JItlAdOJ 3H1ANV' ONIMVM0OlJ V91.NOJ 3M1 nNSX£6bE0aE6l INSX£61,C06£6I 'AXSY.C6b£09.1 TIMC6K09E6I '1XSXC6000SE61 'ANSX£6,09£6! 'ONSXC6,09E61 'O219XE64EO9Cb l 'aloe ylI'n q li t -t uold alts auolsapgo0 SHd 'OZJ9X9L>E08£6 t ' s1a1X B�nP� l01 O£6Y£O9£6 i \�+0\O V 0 iE6tE09E61 \anll�o\9C6 t\�A :awou 6uynoq wop4: ! i - 9IOL/BO/q0 :alo0 loll U.,00•094UOIS.NvAm t IS, NW 'InD, A, 9, ADMLIPH SSEZ 3a4uels ON Dll tiggr.Ng Z=01:0VsZrAlig ss= _ .31VCI (IINNOIS SS8DDV )0112LL 32:1Id NW "IT11VA JlddV DV1 Dr\10119903 SHd 8 2 2 8 2 2 9 CNI C?, U 11 IL )(11 I I I 1 d i ) 1 ›...h.,,,,,__4 I g, CD " k 1 / I /111 1 ,N, 14 a: /j 11 /// i , ,,,_ 1 ic. 0 '/ I i -I ,,! I /7 1 1 7 i , ,,/ L._, ,, ' 1 I i, /1 LI 1 1 1 -u-7-''' il /1 / , 1 1 ::----1,111-1Alld,:fiT------!- ri 1 if i r 1 ._____1 I,,8 ,4 i II r 'I , ' I 0: L a I ! i _ i 1, V) k Lil k'c7,,` 1 to CO 4 0 7 I , 0-1 a L-- 1 f9 ) Mir 111.-.111111111,111r gwommiso, 11111111M 1111111,111 1 10 WW1 \11. 10111.6u co CNI / i / .1 1 1 u 1 i I i - 8 t 1 I i 1 A 'i ll-----,,-) .. i ' t\\ ' I tt t I, , Q 0 ,- tT.T ----' 0 Lo up cp. c,.5 i 15 06 6 CO 0, / /I 1 1 - , 2.). 7 EC 7 ° > ) /„// ,// „// . '-,,'N'-• .52 2 /,/ P ," •-• t CI 0 < H 3 cn, i",/ / (z / \ / 1 ' " /, , \ \ // / /e ,----78 / / / / % / / 1 / 't/ - fiNSXC61,Calt81 7NSXC61,08C6 I "AYSX£61•£09£8 I TIXS1(C6n08£6 'llISXCOSORE6 I "ANSXS6,08,61. "ONSXC61,IX3E6 I '1,1,18YetO,S;Citl, ..4.1(1q.D .02113X9=6,=.IX C" 61 \WAZ,11'.'-'91 \LIZA/E10/90 44Cd 1 SS 'IS m Aomq,,H SETZ 3awel.s (!) EROSION CONTROL LEGEND ON al .31VO NVld 10111NOD IN9WICI3S ONV NOIS0113 aVII0dW9.1 NJ ',G11VA JlddV DIV1 DNOISTrili300 SHd 2 2 8 8 8 -------- .--77 , '' - N),.., / N :NN\\ '.5'\ \‘,....\ ' \ 9 v-4 • U 29 DITCH CHECK - ROCK : • 6 8 L ++++++++ ++++++++ +++ 2z d DrI; Dpt> DO> DO> A•fe' 8 8 (7, ° 53E 15, P., e gui F4ffe, 0 • / Vc3, 211 / nwsxe6rcoat61, "ZNSXC6ITCrate, I "AYSYC.0.6t 'nocsxcanee 61 ',1XSXC61,08t61, 'ANSXC6stO.6 t .01,13X£61,0.6 I \dRce, \ A ..ertoeij,0,0 Lad' v:t. 910Z/80/90 ,a1.0 told wo7'7aluols'1Y,�.v., I I SS N IN Inod '1S M 9f AomLAH SECZ 3a4.ue}S ON 7n 31VO .JdnivN01S AlaHdwnN a3hoa a roN 1Ntaa "VIOS3NNIW JO 3,1S 3. AO SMVl 3. ?l3ONO 213.19N-11.6101.3301.03,13311 1180 V 1^N 1, ONV NOISInd3d�S l737lIG AW 7l3ONfI M03W AH O321Vd321d SYM 1210d321 i1C 'NOi1VOlA173dS'M+ld 5)H11VNA AAUL'3O A93N3H 1 ,-%=;--------- - _______::---_ „L __ -,--- T ... �_- '''....________1.7_f,,, �� , '/---,/ O \ \--- -------:--- _ _____ Ntfld 08102 0 NW '1A11VA Dlddd DiV1 9NOlS9199OD SHd rY 2 M OC 2 {�{uu 8 1�1 8 2 '41 N 6 h tD 8 8 / Ili �8woQ=OIO+ az2 w (_Ewmw Ob~ }z00Nthli OxawWiw EZ04Z4" °lig 1O o1Ln:hi! Wmp3aEr} 011''' Cacq_.,1!._piW-JOaM. 00< w aWOz4ig1OmiU ILU`c,1O- gilhil.i.waO liz1117;:i iimoOU81~oOi1m-a_w i!;b1 Z_oO°=m011iin-=. iLackqi,L,2 =5��O¢QOOnZTik'0�v ud 'N30p19MOi SI 731Nb'1S A8 p3AMOHInY idHl NVHI M3H10 3SOdMM ANV MOA 3Sf1 710 N0117f100Md3M '731NViS AO .t1M3dOMd 3H13dY SONIMY7i0 pNd SN')i53p Pb Ol S1H`JWAd07 3H1 'AVHO 1ltOHllM 731Nb15 OI p31MOd3M 39 1T'H$ $NCISSM/O MO SdOMM3 ANV- `JNIMV7K7 3Ht 31Y75 tON Op 'SNgSN3NK1 llV MOS 31�R1pdS3M 38 ONY A31M3n IIYHS 71017 VM1Np7 3H1 ONS 6P£O9£6 'PO., I Z-3 U{odp.4.0'ZNS 6P£O8£61'AXSX£6t£09£61 ONSX£6P£08£6 Od9X£6P£O9£6! BMP' 10£OE6P£O9 91-S I-1 uold alis auolsapgoO $Hd "O1J9X9[PE08£61 ':s1a1X 51\B.+.O\OVJ\E6P£OQ£61\anllPo\8£61\:6 :awou &,1„olO �16:Z - a l DZ/80/90 �a1oO aqd C gg NA in, M 9C A0.46!H ST£Z 3aluels Dfl .501i .31V0 .3a,Nois ,1053NNIW 40 alVlS .1,0 SMV14Hi aRat, 1010ISS34011403SN3D11 „ono v 1Yul ONY ec';42(,sik,\,t2fg,'°4",',44°11,21;1.A,',1Z/nt= NVld NIVNIGIVM 8 IGAUS AINIINVS 'A]llVA ilddV DWI gNOISTI9903 SHd 2 6 2 8 8 8 8 68 8 9 'V 4, r .1 LCE ccl ,(-...! Plif2E1 il LI' 6Ltni i(7,zig.gg,T. LA ' (42LVEV8' 55 I LtILEPI .T=',2sei- FP= z VE2gg,,-,81' 2E ;2(1.10 H OligEMI dt)„,TtE,q, RP •CON MPE! (!: * ,aft:T.4.105 W h!1li,,,niig:illhs4cnpiOccs!ca(Ii(4i]t7).nA00m!"9-,..14-.-t2 511;rpgl6 ci) (Wg4I IatWalgI1 ,,[.•- -,t :--:-,2,•. / ' /,rt4i 0w /,' , -w 0 '''' 1 1 I °--;-'i„F,> Rt_p ., -/' LAWAflii t CI: 6 g (1 cl / - ''''-•<,_ -r-' '. : (./ , 0 0 0 0 0 ® 000 '' -77.4WANEYggH4 1.1,1SXC64CORE6L "AXSX,64,08£6 TIXSX£61,09E6 .1XS.61TOT,L;A:.405,t5:g9Z,"&t,Z,,,,,L,g14s,,66=,6,6CA,Cit?£.6\1,;ECI6b, ZXZL::10,n6,1.,:=; wc,1,1 - 9.18,90 soloG 4,1 nNSXC61,02ta 'AXSX£61-£0.6 I "r1X5.61,08C6 'Inn 61,C04136,1„:,70S,XSI=V:&IS:jt,S1v7,C,66I, wdmz t - C./80/90 .1,3 Pk] 1.1)03• U 0 5,v.v., CI I SS NW m ADmUE,H SEEL 304u ON 30 .31VO ,nivNots NN iNkd SNNT7diilliNigii7;1214:93i1 12ig,1::112\10-.N011V3Ii NYld 83M3S W?i0JS ',011VA 91ddV L_ / DIV1 DNOIS919000 SHd 8 2 8 8 8 8 2 6 8 8 2 ct; 8 N.:7411',V,AagliififOggigfigl4 alM61,09C6LTINVCOTOKWAYSX,61,08t61.M.C60£0.4.1XSX£61TOT,=====grIMF:iFyia WOO.001vvUlDi1LAvAm6 C 1 SS M 9C AD Z 3e4uelS 8 ON .31V0 3,111vNOIS wakvis nd 0.1 3rIVN N 1D3111-0., .1V-JSCINV103tN3DIIT1rC)1 d'aNn modC:1,,\,,,,,dr1S103,1,3 A. a3aNn 210 3. A, 0321VI d'321Hd'SZ NOLIVD14103dS 'NV, S11,1 IVH1 Adllb30 ki1.13H 1 NV1d 9NLLNVld 'AD11VA ,,--,_-• \----- — it, ,L—'-_-,t---r/ __L-1—<-- , — — ----, ''---- ; 0'0 ,. ,,/,' „-----1 .° \\ ,___,... /,.. \ / ,,, - 0 A \\—/ //I i 7 A e/' iii -- _J / //1 4' -__,--__---_,--,1 , ,, ,, /4/ 1 / , 1 ,i, / ; I Iil ----..,_7-------, i //, I' i ' g),IV1 9N01019003 SHd 8 5 2 Ti 5 2 8 2 8 6 1?-> 2 8 9 9 v—I 50 1-1 X —J I I I 1 8 3 * \ \ o / /\ 2 \ 0 N / \ / "\ \ ,\, /% ,/// /-0 ,1 1 Ps Cy / \\® E .770151ififigifififfgEig P.^.)0,NSXCott'00C6 L ,SXC6tE0,3£6 .nNsxcortoecot .z.n6reoecal 'AXSYC6tC08,6 1 .nx SX£61,02,6 .SYS6KOK6 1 .ANSXE6,013£6 t "ONSX£61,08£6 'CISBXE6721£6,10,176):grt‘ \,,,,ovtd,/s6:=6 - 910Z/90/90 ,.71,0 4.1d W03•00IUDIS.9999,99 m ..-16!H SCEZ eimels .31VCI .321!),NOIS 1Nkd VIOS9NNIN1 91V1S 9H1. SMVI 3H19901, nrINV103,13DI-1 /011C3 V WV I IVH1 ON' 1,099/1 210 ,4011VDIAKIII'4?/"S'12 rb'''HAI'ACAj1=1113'41 Ntfld 213A0D ON1101:19 "ATITVA DldcW DIV1 NO.1.019'003 SHd 8 9 8 2 2 8 8 2 2 9 9 N7:0151722,N41,;,A7.47421?,:ffitg4, .9.3 P,,I01-3-,ISXC6STOBC6 ,Nsxcormac6t INSXE6PC051,6t ltASX.ITORC61 "AXSX£61209,6 I snxsxcencrac61 .1)<SX.C6PECIIIE6 I 'ANsx.reogui "ONSX16PC.6 '0913XC6rp£6, LLIcI94,Z - 910Z/80/90 s.1.0 .19 ---__OUTLOT --- - RECONFIGURED ,' "--- " - - - ------ ------- - . ' ' --3'-- '---- ' :-,--.__-- f-----------3.75-ACRESW._--%-;----;---:%_-1_;-illii----- ---'::-* EQUIVALENT OR GREATER ------- THAN EXISTING OUTLOT "61 -'-'-' '-'-'_-----___--4------:: -------_%---__, ----„------:, ---------c-t ' %---"i - - :-_, - - ,,, -,-,- - - -_, _ . -- - -- - , - - - - ---i.=-__-- ;- , --- --•-'- - , -1;,--:-.e.--, .- - ---,---,-,--_--- -----%----- NFIGURED OUTLOT "G" 3.75 ACRES UIVALENT OR GREATER N EXISTING OUTLOT " Orchard Path Senior Housing Site Plan APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA IIII presbyterian 6-8-16 1 72535-16024 homes & services EDI ESSENTIAL DECISIONS INC ASPHALT SHINGLES FIBER CEMENT SHAKE SIDING - DARK BLUE FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING - LIGHT GRAY VINYL WINDOWS FIBER CEMENT TRIM - DARK GRAY MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER 0 v, 0 -J LU LLJ F- 0 0 J W W 0 W k cc 11 ELEVATION COMPARISON • A 3 CCI CIA ■ice �' aZ1 CL) COD CO) COD E H 0 WATER TOWER Z �0 :: 0 COW Q m= 0 CO C) L) a 1— U W 1 W 1- 0 = o t-rW V♦ 1- W Q W z P ORCHARD PATH J J co 0sXm F- Z 0 12 W W W � w� w.„th.„ 4Fm O O cfq 43441D • — 0 1 p.= ASSISTED LIVING MEMORY CARE ::,11111111 joi ifa 11 1111 0 MEMORY CARE INDEPENDENT LIVING LILI CIRCULATION 0) 0 1ST FLOOR PLAN (5) 8 53 1b Lu 4 MEMORY CARE -r ADMINISTRATIVE CIRCULATION 0 z 11 491 bO • NM 0 1 L. 0 • MIMI 0) (0) fa "E to L. v 0 0 1 -400z w z0 z 0 z L6' ;91 z o < D CIRCULATION E ft. 0 z 3RD FLOOR PLAN ( 5 ) 0 ME z 111 —LILI 11 b N 0 00 0 1.4 00 4:6 co cn cc. 00 0 CO N v4 CO ct:9°° V 6.6 LL. cn 00 crsb c 0050 LL e -i 01 rs, e-1 tD 00 on 00 ri e-1 N 00 LA tit 00 0 00 co a. un te-P E 8 2 4V 4/1 X 2 tA A R 5i i,4 iii i,i ; E 1 in ri 1- .4 rl r -i. __a t... r4 .1 00i00000000wrstr..-1 ma 0 0 1— 1— I MIMIIIIAF I; 1111111 11111111111111 1=111111 mmr1111111:111111111111111111 00 0 : MIN MCI MIMI 1111 MEIN 111111111 1111 111111111111 ItO 8 ifa 11 1 AERIAL VIEW a = co "Ia% ci?'" acuAt ci) 111 ce) cia O bO 0 1 L 0 w 1) Q fa I- 0 aart � w Z L _Z L w 4 0J aM iii _it'll i 0 0 2 w AERIAL VIEW 5 w VIEW FROM EAST SIDE OF THE LAKE =VIEWPOINT 0_w VIEW FROM MIDDLE OF LAKE 5 1 z c, w VIEW FROM MIDDLE OF LAKE, NORTH SIDE z VIEW FROM MIDDLE OF LAKE, SOUTH SIDE 11 eL z 0 LIJ VIEW FROM NEAREST SINGLE FAMILY HOME 0 ›- LU VIEW FROM EXISTING PAD 1 CID CL) 0 VIEW FROM NEAREST TOWNHOME tO z w VIEW FROM ENTRY OF TARGET 11 A z w VIEW FROM INTERSECTION OF PILOT KNOB RD & 157TH ST 0 a. w > a. w AERIAL VIEW C y CVS CIA •P..4 w prZZI CZ) CIA L Ot$ cthA bO . _ Vf 0 0 . _ Q to 1- a 0 (/) UJ Lz CO iw'D C15M N • w a. tD • fclz. 00 z 5 z cL >w - AERIAL VIEW VIEW FROM EAST SIDE OF THE LAKE nn —T.z bO z 0 1 w (f) ..c 4.• < 1- uJ 0. -13 z z co w 2), 0 zzi LYA Ls hp, w ,f) > Lefl X Et VIEW FROM MIDDLE OF LAKE All H z 0 a z >- w VIEW FROM MIDDLE OF LAKE, NORTH SIDE • 111"' e a i••4 ! - ar) rti C/4 Sow C141$ COO E ..= VIEW FROM MIDDLE OF LAKE, SOUTH SIDE 1 • z w VIEW FROM NEAREST SINGLE FAMILY HOME VIEW FROM EXISTING PAD 0 >LLJ— 5 z a - w w 0 VIEW FROM NEAREST TO tin • mum 11) 0 0 • min 4) < CO F— LLJM Z Z CO ..0 4.) LLI 1±1.1 X 2, CL < 1- 1 2 0 VIEW FROM ENTRY OF TARGET 0 >LIJ- VIEW FROM INTERSECTION OF PILOT KNOB RD & 157TH ST A 1 t13.1.VM WOE 33NVISICI SBWOH DNIISDG V DNIGIMO CBSOdatid 3)IV1 3NOIS319803 SHd ONSX.C6PCOPC61 ZNSXE6s£09£61 ,XSX.ITOBESI. "t1XSXUAT00£61 .1XSIE6K01.1.ANSXE6TC0916L 'ONSW6PEOK6L "ON= u...vid;rs..s.tqcioDZI,I;(611X9== fs:fr 910ZA/80/90 ,,,ma 4. Murphy, Joan From: Sent: To: Subject: Murphy, Joan Wednesday, June 15, 2016 8:59 AM Lovelace, Tom FW: Cobblestone Lake Proposed Presbyterian Home From: cd mcclun [mailto:cdmcclun@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 8:55 AM To: Murphy, Joan Subject: Cobblestone Lake Proposed Presbyterian Home After looking further at the proposal by Presbyterian Homes to increase the mass of the Cobblestone Lake project, we state our opposition to this. We ask the Planning Commission and City of Apple Valley to reject this enlarged project. We ask the park to remain in its original location. We ask that any building that is proposed not be over 3 stories high. The pond path is virtually surrounded by buildings and we need space left that looks to open areas and not more buildings. Craig and Donna McClun 15670 Duck Pond Way Apple Valley Craig & Donna McClun cdmcclunggmail.com 651.344.7334 1 Murphy, Joan From: Sent: To: Subject: Murphy, Joan Wednesday, June 15, 2016 8:11 AM Lovelace, Tom FW: Cobblestone Lake Senior Housing Complex From: Gary Grover [mailto:grovergary@hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 5:44 PM To: Murphy, Joan Subject: Cobblestone Lake Senior Housing Complex To whom it concerns: I wish to respectfully voice my opposition to the Apple Valley Planning Commission about the the Presbyterian Homes request to build a five story building at the west end of the Cobblestone Lake complex. A few weeks back when my wife and I went to the informal meeting held by the developer the proposal was for a four story building. That is really is too tall for that area of the community but now the plan is to make it even taller. My understanding of the updated proposal would also minimize the land dedicated for the public park and shift it off to a corner on the west end of the complex. I believe we need to maintain the open park areas at Cobblestone which is so important to the residents. My wife Jean and I have lived in the development since 2005. When we moved in to our house the developer and the city were describing that the vision for the neighborhood would include shops and restaurants at the west end where the senior housing complex is now being proposed. I do not oppose the complex in general but the proposed height would overwhelm the neighborhood and dramatically change the look and feel of the west end of the lake and the entire neighborhood. Even the original 4 story design is too high given the building site elevation, the proximity to the lake, the surrounding land and the nearby existing homes. I do understand that the west end has always been designated for high density and retail but this proposed building does not, in my opinion, fit in this neighborhood. A building of this size and especially the new proposed height is something I would expect to see on the 494 corridor or maybe even in the central district of Apple Valley where there are numerous 4 story buildings. Certainly the market has changed since we moved in but this is a dramatic design departure to the neighborhood that current Cobblestone Lake residents have invested in. Especially since we were told this would be a homogeneous planned community that once built out would have the feel of a town like Stillwater. Thank you for attention to my concerns and your efforts to make Apple Valley a great community. Respectfully, Gary Grover Murphy, Joan From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Murphy, Joan Tuesday, June 14, 2016 4:09 PM Lovelace, Tom FW: One additional photograph from Elizabeth Pick Attachment-ljpeg; ATT00001.txt Original Message From: Bpick10684 [mailto:bpick10684@aol.comi Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 3:47 PM To: Murphy, Joan Cc: Bill Pick Subject: One additional photograph from Elizabeth Pick Here is a similar photograph to the one I recently sent regarding the site for the proposed Presbyterian Homes project. Just a slightly different angle. Elizabeth Pick 1 c Murphy, Joan From: Sent: To: Subject: Murphy, Joan Tuesday, June 14, 2016 3:56 PM Lovelace, Tom FW: Important: Presbyterian Homes project at Cobblestone Lake From: Bpick10684 [mailto:bpicklO684@aoLcom] Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 3:41 PM To: Murphy, Joan Cc: Bill Pick Subject: Important: Presbyterian Homes project at Cobblestone Lake To the members of the Apple Valley Planning Commission, I was in attendance at the initial planning meeting on April 20, 2016. I am shocked and extremely disappointed to find out that the new Presbyterian Homes project indicates that the size has GROWN in scale to a maximum height of five stories. My husband, Bill, and I am moved into our new detached townhouse on the northeast corner of Cobblestone Lake in December 2015. Bill and I have looked at the renderings of what the height of the building is "supposed" to look like. When I picture a building, the size and scale of the project, I don't believe for one moment that it is NEARLY as small as indicated in the rendering that was shown to the board in the planning commission video from just a couple of weeks ago. Attached is a photograph my husband took this past weekend from our patio area. We live at 15638 Eddington Way in Apple Valley. Please take a look at the this photograph, and at the space west of the lake, as shown from our patio, which is quite close to this location. A five -story structure built in the space, with wings jutting out from it, would be VERY large. The artist's rendering that was presented, in my opinion and Bill's, looks truthfully, more than a little bit "off'. . We are not opposed to Presbyterian Homes, specifically building there, but we are opposed to the fact that this project is getting larger and larger. We don't believe that Presbyterian homes should get preferential treatment to build such a large and tall building this close to the lake, and be able to continually increase the size and scope of their project on the lake. One question: Will Presbyterian homes and/or their residents be paying association fees (like all other homeowners around the lake do) to the homeowners association? I appreciate an answer to this question, and taking my concerns about the scope of this building project into consideration. Many thanks, Elizabeth Pick 15638 Eddington Way Apple Valley, MN 55124 CC: Bill Pick 1 Sent from my iPhone Murph Joan From: Sent: To: Subject: Murphy, Joan Tuesday, June 14, 2016 3:11 PM Lovelace, Tom FW: Presbyterian Homes From: Bill Franke [mailto:bfranke67©gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 3:09 PM To: Murphy, Joan Subject: Presbyterian Homes I am writing to express concern about the height of the proposed senior housing complex buildings in Cobblestone Lake. I understand that Presbyterian Homes is now asking to build the building 5 stories tall. The previous request was for 4 stories. We would prefer a 3 story limit, but would accept 4. 5 stories is too tall as it would overwhelm the surrounding neighborhood. Please limit this building height to not more than 4 stories. My mother has been a resident of Presbyterian Homes in Bloomington for over 25 years. The buildings there are 3 stories, and they feel large. William Franke Leah Franke 15579 Duck Trail Lane Apple Valley MN 55124 (952) 423-6356 Murph Joan From: Sent: To: Subject: Murphy, Joan Tuesday, June 14, 2016 1:47 PM Lovelace, Tom FW: Cobblestone Lake Senior Housing Original Message From: Robin Ricke [mailto:ricke022@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 1:40 PM To: Murphy, Joan Subject: Cobblestone Lake Senior Housing To whom it may concern, I live at 15716 Duck Pond Way in Apple Valley in the Cobblestone Lake subdivision. I am writing today regarding the proposed development "PHS Cobblestone Lake Senior Housing Complex". I am very concerned with the proposed size of the building. My understanding is that the building was originally planned to be 3 stories high. Now the proposal is 4 stories (and a possible 5 story proposal has recently been withdrawn). My opinion is that anything higher than 3 stories is far too large for our development. This size will severely deter from the lovely nature area we currently have. Moreover, other developments within the city such as Cobblestone Square are not located within a development such as ours and are only 3 stories high. Why should the PHS Cobblestone Lake Senior Housing Complex be any larger? I don't understand what the justification for this may be. Regards, Robin Ricke 15716 Duck Pond Way Apple Valley MN 55124 1 Murphy, Joan From: Sent: To: Subject: Murphy, Joan Tuesday, June 14, 2016 12:57 PM Lovelace, Tom FW: Cobblestone Development Project From: Iori.kahler@usbank.com [mailto:lori.kahler@usbank.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 12:50 PM To: Murphy, Joan Subject: Cobblestone Development Project Hello I am a resident currently living in the cobblestone neighborhood. There has been quite a bit of discussion about the proposal Presbyterian Homes has submitted to the city for a 5 story development at the end of the lake by Target. I personally am not in support of that large of a building or structure going into this development. It will not be in alignment with the current building structures. The proposal should only be considered if the complex is no more that 3 stories high, which would be alignment with the current neighborhood structure. We do not want a building taking away the ascetic appeal of the neighborhood, nor adding that much traffic to the neighborhood, filled with children. I can tell you that the neighborhood is having a ongoing discussion and plans on making its position known to the city as well. Regards, Lori Kahler US Bank Mortgage Risk Vice President 1550 American Blvd Bloomington, MN 952-876-9578office 320-420-4563 cell U.S. BANCORP made the following annotations Electronic Privacy Notice. This e-mail, and any attachments, contains information that is, or may be, covered by electronic communications privacy laws, and is also confidential and proprietary in nature. If you are not the intended recipient, please be advised that you are legally prohibited from retaining, using, copying, distributing, or otherwise disclosing this information in any manner. Instead, please reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error, and then immediately delete it. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. Murphy, Joan From: Sent: To: Subject: Murphy, Joan Tuesday, June 14, 2016 12:57 PM Lovelace, Tom FW: Cobblestone Development Project From: lori.kahler@usbank.com [mailto:IorLkahler@usbank.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 12:50 PM To: Murphy, Joan Subject: Cobblestone Development Project Hello I am a resident currently living in the cobblestone neighborhood. There has been quite a bit of discussion about the proposal Presbyterian Homes has submitted to the city for a 5 story development at the end of the lake by Target. I personally am not in support of that large of a building or structure going into this development. It will not be in alignment with the current building structures. The proposal should only be considered if the complex is no more that 3 stories high, which would be alignment with the current neighborhood structure. We do not want a building taking away the ascetic appeal of the neighborhood, nor adding that much traffic to the neighborhood, filled with children. I can tell you that the neighborhood is having a ongoing discussion and plans on making its position known to the city as well. Regards, Lori Kahler US Bank Mortgage Risk Vice President 1550 American Blvd Bloomington, MN 952-876-9578office 320-420-4563 cell U.S. BANCORP made the following annotations Electronic Privacy Notice. This e-mail, and any attachments, contains information that is, or may be, covered by electronic communications privacy laws, and is also confidential and proprietary in nature. If you are not the intended recipient, please be advised that you are legally prohibited from retaining, using, copying, distributing, or otherwise disclosing this information in any manner. Instead, please reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error, and then immediately delete it. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. 1 Murphy, Joan From: Sent: To: Subject: Murphy, Joan Tuesday, June 14, 2016 8:21 AM Lovelace, Tom FW: Cobblestone Lake Senior Housing Complex From: Mike Falteisek [mailto:mfalteisek@aol.com] Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 3:10 PM To: Murphy, Joan Subject: Cobblestone Lake Senior Housing Complex While I have no problem with the proposed Senior Housing Complex in Cobblestone Lake, as a homeowner in Cobblestone Lake, I do object to the proposed change to a 5 story building. This change would make this building tower over the others in our community. Thank you for your consideration. Mike Falteisek 15610 Duck Trail Lane mfalteisek@aol.com Murph , Joan From: Sent: To: Subject: Murphy, Joan Tuesday, June 14, 2016 8:21 AM Lovelace, Tom FW: Proposed expansion of Cobblestone Lake Senior Housing complex From: Jackie Seliger [mailto:jmceachran©gmail.com] Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 11:21 AM To: Murphy, Joan Subject: Proposed expansion of Cobblestone Lake Senior Housing complex Hello, as a resident of the Cobblestone Lake community I was very concerned to learn about the proposed expansion of the Presbysterian Homes Senior housing complex. I feel that this expansion is a significant change and deserves another set of public hearings so that all in the community are aware. I am personally not supportive of this large of a building in our community regardless of it's purpose. A building of this size is huge for the city of Apple Valley and definitely too large for our small community that is already largely developed. .1.11.111 Jackie Seliger 15972 Elmwood Way Apple Valley, MN 55124 1 Murph Joan From: Sent: To: Subject: Murphy, Joan Tuesday, June 14, 2016 8:20 AM Lovelace, Tom FW: Presbyterian Homes Original Message From: Dyan Daniels [mailto:danielsdy@hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 4:03 PM To: Murphy, Joan Subject: Presbyterian Homes I am writing to you regarding the proposed Presbyterian Homes change to their original proposal from 4 stories to 5 which will effectively wall off the west end of Cobblestone Lake. I grew up in Apple Valley and specifically relocated back to Minnesota so I could raise my children in an outstanding school district and community. I reside in Cobblestone and am opposed to creating a structure that would negatively impact not only our neighborhood but also community culture. Increasing units will only increase traffic and decrease our community culture and safety but also impact our children's learning environment. There is no need to make this building five stories. The agenda for the Wednesday, June 15 meeting will be posted on the city website at 4:30. If you'd like to voice your opinion at the meeting, please check the agenda. http://www.ci.apple-valley.mn.us/index.aspx?LVID=98 Sent from my iPhone 1 Murph , Joan From: Sent: To: Subject: Murphy, Joan Tuesday, June 14, 2016 8:20 AM Lovelace, Tom FW: PHS Senior Complex at Cobblestone Lake From: ppakiz©frontier.com [mailto: ppakiz@frontier.com] Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 4:30 PM To: Murphy, Joan Subject: PHS Senior Complex at Cobblestone Lake Dear decision makers, As a resident of Cobblestone Lake, I have a real interest in the development of this area. It seems we have had a number of disappointments in what was expected when we moved in and what has happened and continues to happen to erode the neighborhood. I would like to voice my objection to the increased height of the Senior Complex at the west end of Cobblestone Lake. I also urge you to keep as much park space as possible to keep the development one that fosters green space and outdoor living. Thank you for listening. Patrice Pakiz 612-600-7030 c 952-423-9160 h 15666 Duck Pond Way, AV 1 Murph , Joan From: Sent: To: Subject: Murphy, Joan Tuesday, June 14, 2016 8:20 AM Lovelace, Tom FW: Presbyterian Homes in cobblestone lake Original Message From: Anubhav Rastogi [mailto:anubhavrast@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 10 2016 5:43 PM To: Murphy, Joan Subject: Presbyterian Homes in cobblestone lake I am a resident of cobblestone lake community and got to know about Presbyterian Homes proposing a 5 story building. I am extremely unhappy with that move. It will take away the glory of the lake and would wall of the view. It will also add extra traffic in the area. Sent from my iPhone 1 Murph , Joan From: Sent: To: Subject: Murphy, Joan Tuesday, June 14, 2016 8:20 AM Lovelace, Tom FW: Presbyterian homes Original Message From: cccuio1961@gmail.com [mailto:cccujo1961@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 8:02 PM To: Murphy, Joan Subject: Presbyterian homes I would like to voice my concerns over the plans of this 4-5 story building that is being planned in this community. Itis too large for the area, the design doesn't fit the design of the community. I think that you need to consider the residents in the area and listen to their concerns. Thank you. Sent from my iPhone Murphy, Joan From: Sent: To: Subject: Murphy, Joan Tuesday, June 14, 2016 8:20 AM Lovelace, Tom FW: PHS Cobblestone lake seniour housing complex From: Clinton Gomes [mailto:canuckclint@yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 8:05 PM To: Murphy, Joan Subject: Re: PHS Cobblestone lake seniour housing complex Hi there, received a letter in my mailbox that the original proposal for a 3-4 story building for Care Complex is now proposed for 5. 5 stories is too high. It'll ruin the view and it'll stand out like a giant in the park, obscuring the rest of the Cobblestone layout, developers have meticulously built. I vehemently oppose 5 stories. Please consider our thoughts on this matter strongly. Clinton 86 family. Apple Valley Coblestone Lake Resident 1 Murph , Joan From: Sent: To: Subject: Murphy, Joan Tuesday, June 14, 2016 8:19 AM Lovelace, Tom FW: Very upset about proposed senior housing in Cobblestone Lake From: Robert W McClure [mailto:mcclure@stolaf.edu] Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2016 10:08 AM To: Murphy, Joan Subject: Very upset about proposed senior housing in Cobblestone Lake My wife and I are emailing you to indicate our anger over the proposed 5 story senior housing being proposed for Cobblestone Lake. A 5 story building that close to the lake would tower over other structures. As a Cobblestone Lake resident and past land use/housing planner, I can not believe the lack of foresight being waged with this proposal. With ever expanding urbanization in the area, it is essential that we maintaing some semblance of consistency of design and aesthetics in our neighborhoods. This proposal lacks of both. Again, please note our strongest opposition to this proposal. We are very supportive of senior housing, but it must be constructed in a manner that is consistent with the existing structures and themes. Yours, Dr. Robert McClure Associate Professor Director, Social Studies Education Middle East Programs Advisor St. Olaf College 612-384-8822 - cell 1 Murph ,Joan From: Sent: To: Subject: Murphy, Joan Tuesday, June 14, 2016 8:19 AM Lovelace, Tom FW: cobblestone lake From: Sewell, Jason [mailto:Jason.Sewell@CenturyLink.com] Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2016 3:04 PM To: Murphy, Joan Subject: cobblestone lake Not happy about the change in plans for the PHS cobblestone lake Sr. housing complex. 1 do not support this change and would he ver.) disappointed if these changes \\ ere to be approved. Please do not do this! Regards Jason This communication is the property of CenturyLink and may contain confidential or privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the communication and any attachments. 1 Murph , Joan From: Sent: To: Subject: Murphy, Joan Tuesday, June 14, 2016 8:19 AM Lovelace, Tom FW: Cobblestone Lake Senior Housing Complex Original Message From: Marcia Beyer[mailto:marcia.beyer@icloud.com] Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2016 4:22 PM To: Murphy, Joan Subject: Cobblestone Lake Senior Housing Complex Members of Planning Commission: We are concerned about a new proposal for the Presbyterian Homes that has been submitted for your consideration. The height revision from 3 or 4 stories to 5 does not conform with the existing residential or commercial structures in the Cobblestone Lake Development. Thank you for your consideration. Russell and Marcia Beyer 15602 Eddington Way, Apple Valley 651-332-2213 Sent from my iPad 1 Murph , Joan From: Sent: To: Subject: Murphy, Joan Tuesday, June 14, 2016 8:19 AM Lovelace, Tom FW: Presbyterian Home Proposal for Cobblestone Lake From: Mark Nelson [mailto:mdn605@aolicom] Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2016 7:38 PM To: Murphy, Joan Cc: Sedonasuzy@aolicom Subject: Presbyterian Home Proposal for Cobblestone Lake Dear Planning Commission Members, Suzanne and I live directly on the south side of the lake at 15925 Elmwood Way. From our deck, we have a direct view of the park, Target, and the proposed Home. We are concerned about the massive scale of the Presbyterian Home which, as currently proposed, would be four times the square footage of Target when completed. With 5 stories, the home would tower over the lake and other development at some 69 feet. By contrast, Target is one level. We are not opposed to the Home per se, but feel the structure should be more modest. Incidently, the Presbyterian Home in Bloomington appears to be two levels. Sincerely, Mark Nelson 1 Murph , Joan From: Sent: To: Subject: Murphy, Joan Tuesday, June 14, 2016 8:18 AM Lovelace, Tom FW: PHS Cobblestone Lake Senior Housing Complex From: Mike Brown [mailto:Mike.Brown@fisiononline.com] Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2016 11:52 AM To: Murphy, Joan Cc: Mike Brown Subject: Re: PHS Cobblestone Lake Senior Housing Complex To Whom it may concern, As a resident of the Cobblestone Lake community, we are writing to voice our concern regarding the attempt to rezone the Cobblestone Lake area to include the proposed PHS Cobblestone Lake Senior Housing complex. It is too large, placed in the wrong area on the lot and would totally block the lake views that the entire neighborhood has been designed around. This project would destroy the serenity of the original master plan. We DO NOT support the rezoning or changing of the original master plan. 4 to 5 stories is an absolute ridiculous suggestion for that parcel of land. It will render this entire community with a terribly ugly eyesore. Use your heads when considering the neighborhood and its residents who pay taxes and additional association fees to maintain this wonderful development. DO NOT approve the requested rezoning and expansion. Respectfully. Mike and Cathy Brown Cobblestone Lake residents 952-484-6426 Mike Brown CEO 430 1St 1-`,.Ve Sijite: 620 MN 55401 612:927,3628 1 Murphy, Joan From: Sent: To: Subject: Murphy, Joan Tuesday, June 14, 2016 8:18 AM Lovelace, Tom FW: concern ---Continuum of Care facility by Presbyterian Homes Original Message From: nancy simkins [mailto:nsimkins@msn.com] Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2016 12:28 PM To: Murphy, Joan Subject: concern ---Continuum of Care facility by Presbyterian Homes We are residents in the North Shore Cobblestone Lake neighborhood and have a major concern regarding the proposed development of a property close to our home. The Continuum of Care facility by Presbyterian Homes (PHS) is too large and too high at the new 5 story plan and it is even unexceptible at the 4 story plan. The height of this proposed facility is TOO high and does not fit into the landscape of this residential area. We are against this development in its current design stage and ask you to reject the design in its current state. Mike and Nancy Simkins 15631 Eddington Way Apple Valley, MN 55124 Murph , Joan From: Sent: To: Subject: Murphy, Joan Tuesday, June 14, 2016 8:18 AM Lovelace, Tom FW: Presbyterian Home planned facility in Apple Valley From: Thomas Nelson [mailto:twnelsonl2@gmaiLcom] Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2016 10:29 PM To: Murphy, Joan Subject: Presbyterian Home planned facility in Apple Valley Good morning, It is our understanding that the Apple Valley Planning Commission is considering a proposal for a new Continuum of Care Facility on the west side of Cobblestone Lake. As a new resident of the Cobblestone Lake community and as the President of the new North Shore Cobblestone Lake homeowners association, I would like to provide some comments to be considered in this evaluation. 1. It is my understanding that the current open land is zoned for commercial use with limits on size and types of buildings. 2. The current request is for a building that is larger than the current zoning would allow and the facility also exceeds a number of other size limitations. 3. The request is for a building that could be as large as 475,000 sq feet. and up to 6 stories. There is a need for further senior care facilities, however it is equally important that these facilities "fit" into the neighborhood they are being build in. This land is likely one of the last "lakeshore" land available in Apple Valley. This land was properly zoned as a commercial property that would be a buffer between the heavy commercial sites to the west and the residential sites to the east surrounding the lake. All of the residents of Cobblestone were aware of the commercial zoning and we purchased our homes with the expectations that these zoning restrictions would be upheld and the new construction would fit into the planned community, including the planned park on the west shore of the lake. The existing buildings and facilities surrounding the lake have a height limit that fits well with the community. Maintaining this height and size limit is critical to maintaining this positive and well rounded environment that exists around Cobblestone. It is important for the existing homeowners of Cobblestone to be able to trust that the zoning standards for this area will be upheld and not expanded. This will maintain the high quality of life that exists around Cobblestone Lake. We are trusting in your review of this in light of the impact to the hundreds of residents in the Cobblestone neighborhood. Thank you for your consideration and hopefully to your opposition to the expansion of the zoning exemptions. Best regards, 1 Thomas Nelson 15618 Eddington Way Apple Valley, MN 612-968-0959 Twnelson12@gmail.com 2 Murph , Joan From: Sent: To: Subject: Murphy, Joan Tuesday, June 14, 2016 8:18 AM Lovelace, Tom FW: Cobblestone Lake Presbyterian Homes Proposed Building From: Judy Keyes [mailto:judyaly@gmaiLcom] Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 6:25 AM To: Murphy, Joan Subject: Cobblestone Lake Presbyterian Homes Proposed Building Good Morning, I am writing this morning in regards to the Cobblestone Lake Presbyterian Homes proposed building. As a resident of Cobblestone Lake, this project is very concerning to me for many reasons. 1.) Increased traffic. We live right on the parkway and we already see many drivers speeding right through the neighborhood at dangerous speeds. Many of these vehicles are ones that do not belong to residents of Cobblestone Lake and usually visitors to either the lake or the nearby shopping areas. While the issue continues and has been addressed with the AVPD, the issue continues to be a concern. Bringing in a building with 315 residents, will increase traffic in the area especially since this building will have multiple visitors and employees. This causes high concern with the number of vehicles vs the number of pedestrians including children that cross the streets to enjoy the parks, pool, and lake in our neighborhood. On multiple occasions, we have noticed there have been vehicles driving the wrong way either in the roundabouts or along the parkway even when they have been clearly marked. Many times, this has occurred right in front of the current senior facility. 2.) The size of the building. The current design for the building does not at all match the style of homes that are currently located in the Cobblestone Lake neighborhood and will dominate the neighborhood. It will take away all the natural beauty. 3.) Safety. With the size of the building and number of residents, we expect there will be more emergency vehicles coming in and out of the neighborhood. On many days especially during the warmer months, there are vehicles parked up and down the parkway which is already pretty narrow at some spots. We expect that with the increase in senior citizens in the neighborhood there will be also more emergency vehicles such as ambulances navigating through the neighborhood. 4.) Upkeep of the building. Both my husband and I have had experiences with Presbyterian Homes. He had worked for them for a few months in keeping their buildings running smoothly. He said that they had one of the poorest maintenance regulations in a building he had ever worked in. Prior to moving to Apple Valley, I lived in a condo across the street to what was a building previously owned by Presbyterian Homes, which had been there about 10 years. 6 months after I moved into that neighborhood, it was closed and changed to section 8 living. 5.) Home Values. We moved into this neighborhood because of the fact that it was a beautiful, well kept, family oriented neighborhood. We believe that a building with the size it is proposed at will block any sunrise and sunset views we are currently able to see from the lake. A building, especially if it is not properly maintained 1 will bring down the values of the homes in the coveted Cobblestone Lake neighborhood. While all the homes in Cobblestone Lake belong to an association, therefore are expected to maintain their homes, what is the guarantee that this proposed building will be expected to be the held to the same standards? Including a facility of this size would be the wrong thing to do. Why not build additional homes in this area to add to the neighborhood? We strongly believe that the addition of these homes will drive property values in Cobblestone Lake down significantly and make it significantly less appealing to live in this neighborhood. Why create such a beautiful neighborhood to only ruin it with such a large unsightly building? This has and will continue to drive away families from such a family oriented neighborhood into communities such as Spirit in Lakeville if it proceeds. Thank you, Judy Keyes "Our greatest glory is not in never failing, but in rising up every time we fail." Ralph Waldo Emerson 2 Murph , Joan From: Sent: To: Subject: Murphy, Joan Tuesday, June 14, 2016 8:17 AM Lovelace, Tom FW: Continuum of Care Facility by PHS Original Message From: Cathy Rauchwarter[mailto:crlikewater63@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 7:51 AM To: Murphy, Joan Subject: Continuum of Care Facility by PHS Apple Valley Planning Commission, I am writing to voice my concerns over Cobblestone Lake Plan for PHS. I understand the building has grown to what is a concern to many of us who live in the Cobblestone Lake area. I do not object to a Continuum of Care facility by PHS but I do object to the new size of the facility that was recently presented. The project exceeds the maximum density of 24 units per acre to 27 units. It contains fewer assisted living units to total units. It does not meet the city's requirements for percentage of building materials that are non-combustible,non-degradable. The building is 12 feet higher than the lake shoreline. It requires an exemption to the 4 story maximum height of a building. I request a postponement of any building and a look at what is being done are zoning requirements. Sincerely, Cathy Rauchwarter 1 Murphy, Joan From: Sent: To: Subject: Murphy, Joan Tuesday, June 14, 2016 8:17 AM Lovelace, Tom FW: Presbyterian Homes proposal From: Nancy Lucas [mailto:tomnancyjamie@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 8:38 AM To: Murphy, Joan Subject: Presbyterian Homes proposal As a new resident in the Cobblestone Lake/Eddington Way development, I want to express my lack of support for the proposed expansion and variance with Presbyterian Homes development. My wife and I have plans to be long term residents of Apple Valley, but will certainly reconsider if our wonderful view and property value are threatened by a variance and change allowing much greater expansion to Presbyterian Homes than currently planned or allowed. Please honor the existing and current zoning. We would otherwise not have built or moved to this area. Thank you for your understanding. TomLucas 15645 Eddington Way Apple Valley, MN 55134 651-456-9797 1 Murph ,Joan From: Sent: To: Subject: Murphy, Joan Tuesday, June 14, 2016 8:17 AM Lovelace, Tom FW: PHS Cobblestone Senior housing From: cd mcclun [mailto:cdmcclun@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 9:46 AM To: Murphy, Joan Subject: PHS Cobblestone Senior housing We are opposed to the changes being proposed by Presbyterian Homes for Cobblestone Lake. The structure needs be 3 stories in height. It should not require the moving of the park area, either. -Craig and Donna McClun 15670 Duck Pond Way Apple Valley Craig & Donna McClun cdmccluna gmail.com 1 From: Sent: To: Subject: Murphy, Joan Tuesday, June 14, 2016 8:17 AM Lovelace, Tom FW: Presbyterian homes Original Message From: Anne Ronning [mailto:nelvin724@icloud.com] Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 9:47 AM To: Murphy, Joan Subject: Presbyterian homes We are very highly against the proposal of the continuum care complex be turned into a 4-5 story unit11111 We are not able to attend but trust you will add this vote to others. Anne and Bob Ronning Duck crossing way Sent from my iPhone Murph , Joan From: Sent: To: Subject: Importance: Murphy, Joan Tuesday, June 14, 2016 8:16 AM Lovelace, Tom FW: PHS Cobblestone Lake Senior Housing Complex Change Request: Statement of Opposition High From: Stephen Westerlund [mailto:5vyestqc1Cq),Lcomcastnet] Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 2:06 PM To: Murphy, Joan Cc: Stephen Westerlund; 'Colleen Westerlund' Subject: PHS Cobblestone Lake Senior Housing Complex Change Request: Statement of Opposition Importance: High To the members of the Apple Valley Planning Commission: I am writing to register my and my spouse's objections in writing regarding the proposed change request submitted by Presbyterian Homes wherein the developers revised their original proposal for a continuum of care complex with 3-4 stories to a complex with 5 stories. We strongly oppose this design change request as a 5 -story continuum of care complex would introduce a very obtrusive structure to our carefully planned neighborhood. Furthermore, this scale of a building, regardless of the architectural design qualities, would tower over all other building structures in the area and would destroy the charm of the existing neighborhood and very likely erode property values as a result. This proposed change has us greatly concerned. As taxpayers and citizens of Apple Valley, we respectfully request that you represent us and our opposing position (as well as the opposition of like-minded Cobblestone Lake residents) and deny this change request on our behalf. Thank you. Stephen & Colleen Westerlund 15608 Eagles Nest Way Apple Valley, MN 55124 1 Murph , Joan From: Sent: To: Subject: Murphy, Joan Tuesday, June 14, 2016 8:12 AM Lovelace, Tom FW: Regarding: PHS Cobblestone Lake Senior Housing Complex Original Message From: nishat parveen [mailto:nishat parveen@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 4:42 PM To: Murphy, Joan Subject: Regarding: PHS Cobblestone Lake Senior Housing Complex Dear Sir/Madam, We are writing to raise our concern regarding new proposal of a massive building to be built in the center and park to be pushed on side. When we decided to buy a house in Cobblestone community in 2013, we did a great deal of research before signing the dotted line. No matter how many new developments we checked at that time, our heart was set on cobblestone because of the lake and great views that it has to offer. We opted for a lake facing site and paid hefty premium for the same. We believed in our investment and thought of this community as great place to raise kids. We were told a big park will be coming in future in the center near the roundabout.We have been waiting patiently for it and suddenly one day we hear that plans are changing. This is not fair to people who invested in area based on the information shared with them. As much as we understand the desire of additional development in the area, we are strongly against the idea of putting huge building at the place where park was promised to people who bought houses in that community. We believe the area can still be developed without compromising on aesthetics of community. Best, Amar Deep Paul Nishat Parveen (Owners of 15917 Elmwood Way, Apple Valley, MN 55124) 1 Murph Joan From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Murphy, Joan Tuesday, June 14, 2016 8:11 AM Lovelace, Tom FW: Cobblestone Lake Senior Housing Development Concerns Sunset & Building Size Perspective jpg; Sunset View Perspective) jpg; Developers Presentation - Screenshot jpg From: Hena .g [mailto: hgov002@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 4:53 PM To: Murphy, Joan Subject: Cobblestone Lake Senior Housing Development Concerns Dear Planning Commission Committee I am a current homeowner in the Cobblestone Lake Committee. I became aware of the senior housing project recently and am writing to you today to raise concerns regarding this project and hopefully add some clarity/bring perspective regarding the senior housing project. 1) Higher Elevation - The location in question has a higher elevation which must be considered for any structure that is to be built there. This is because the high elevation will only add to the height of any structure that is built. 2) Most of the commercial buildings further down from the location are at most 1-2 stories. E.g., Target. The proposed project is for a 5 story building which is more than double of Target building. It will also be taller than the most tallest structure in the surrounding area (i.e, taller than the water tower). See attached "Developers Presentation Screenshot" - Screenshot from the June 1 Planning Commission video. 3) It is a given for any housing or structure that is built it needs to align with the cobblestone community look and feel. From the previous committee feedback, the developer has proposed to change roof lines and adding more masonry to the structure. However, there has been a complete lack of thought and disregard put towards concerns already raised by committee and residents previously. That is instead of reducing height the height has been increased to 5 storeys and also an increase unit count. Future extensions will only add to the size and space of this structure. Seems this only adds to a more profitable investment rather than the greater good of cobblestone community. 1 4) The senior housing structure was already quite tall, but having a 5 story structure is gigantic. Not only the current scale and size of the building is gigantic but having such a structure in the center focal point of the lake changes the look and feel of cobblestone lake community. In comparison, the Residential and commercial buildings are only 1-2 storeys at most. 5) The proposed building is almost comparable to commercial structures in Downtown Minneapolis. To have such a gigantic structure so close to residential housing defeats the purpose of choosing to live in the suburbs. This structure also takes away from the natural environment of the community. 6) Impact on property values - Having a gigantic structure at the focal point of the lake is a profitable investment for the developer as they would be charging top $$ for each unit. But since views and look and feel of the community is impacted, this will ultimately impact the property values of current residents. This structure would hardly be aesthetically pleasing to look out at everyday from your deck, let alone the increase in traffic that it brings with it. 7) Impacted Views - Most concerning of all. The building's height will block any and all sunset view for the residents located on left and right side of the lake. Due to the location of the houses, most residential units do not get a sunrise view, but this is currently offsetted by sunset view. We have paid premium pricing for the lot and view. Please see attached screenshots: The water tower already looks gigantic. It must be considered that the structure is taller than this tower and will be much closer to the lake so it will be quite BIG. See Sunset View Perspectivel; Sunset & Building Size Perspective (all views will be blocked!). 8) The proposed building will also take away a major chunk of park area and greenery that is currently in place. This is very contradictory and conflicting with for example one of the current vision statements of Apply Valley City "Key -1 Sustainable". We ask the question how will this structure add to enhancing the quality and integrity of the existent community? 9) Delivery Vehicles - There is a lot of growing and young families residing in the community which means there is a good size population of children. We must consider how their safety is impacted when heavy duty vehicles and delivery trucks are going in and out 10) Light, excessive noise and activity should be directed away from residential properties. The proposed project is a senior housing with a memory care and nursing facility. It is only natural to assume there is a greater likelihood of accidents/falls etc., and increase of 911 calls/ambulances to the location. It must be considered that noise and lights from these vehicles will directly affect the residential housing and park residents. 2 11) 300 plus units means 300 plus residents. How does this impact the environmental features of the lake and small community? It must be considered it also exceeds the allowed maximum density of 24 units per acre (27). 12) How affordable is this really going to be for seniors? 13) Mixture of structures - it is understandable the city is trying to encourage different structures to single family home. So why not a strong consideration for a recreational facility for the community or a twin home / duplex / townhouse? Wouldn't this be more in alignment with the other structures in this community? This is not in anyway biased from having senior housing in the neighborhood, because there are already ramblers on one end of the lake catering towards seniors. But, if the proposed structure were to be much smaller in height, i.e., 2-3 storeys it would be more reasonable. It is the height and amount of space/units that this structure will have and future extensions that is concerning. 14) Costs - The state is providing a grant for this facility. There should be a middle ground that is in alignment with also what the current neighbor residents have concerns for. After all, we are paying property tax $$. Plus the bigger it is, therefore more costs for the city. 15) Constant change in project - The developers keep changing what is to be built in this location - first it was single family, then town home and now senior housing. Which is still changing in terms of added height and space. One must consider if approved, what else will change or be there a request for change in code/ordinance. 16) Availability of lots - There are currently a number of lots available close to cobblestone community/lake in Apple Valley. If the city wants to have senior housing structure of this scale and size why is there no consideration for other lots which do not impact the residents views let alone the whole community's look and feel. This questions and concerns are shared by many members in the cobblestone community. I sincerely hope our questions and concerns will be considered by the planning commission committee during the decision process. Feel free to message me if you have any questions. Kind regards, 3 Hena Bhakta Resident at Cobblestone Lake 4 d d f Murph , Joan From: Sent: To: Subject: Murphy, Joan Tuesday, June 14, 2016 8:11 AM Lovelace, Tom FW: 6/15/2016 Apple Valley Planning Commission Meeting From: Rachel Haas [mailto:e duchamp@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 9:04 PM To: Murphy, Joan Subject: 6/15/2016 Apple Valley Planning Commission Meeting To whom it may concern: As a resident of Cobblestone Lake I am requesting you turn down the request to allow the Continuum of Care Complex to become a 5 -story building. This is a residential community; a five -story building will destroy the character of the community. When I bought my house 10+ years ago I did so with the understanding zoning rules would prevent it from becoming a mish-mash of buildings. I am also concerned the developer is playing bait and switch with you. It is difficult to believe they didn't know about the potential for a 5th story when the original zoning application was made. I am also concerned this larger building will hurt housing values in Cobblestone Lake. Even after the recent economic recovery my unit is still worth $100k less than the original price I paid at purchase. Please respect the interests of the homeowners over those of the developer. Regards, Rachel Haas 15700 Cobblestone Lake Pkwy Apple Valley, MN 55124 1 Murph Joan From: Sent: To: Subject: Murphy, Joan Tuesday, June 14, 2016 8:11 AM Lovelace, Tom FW: Orchard Path Senior Housing From: Tonya johnson [mailto:tonyarhuff@hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 7:27 AM To: Murphy, Joan Subject: Orchard Path Senior Housing I am against this new revised plans. They will be going higher than needs to be in this area! They are taking away play area, which was supposed to be in the plans! I think this additional height and square footage will take away from our neighborhood! Please do not approve this revised pans of 5 stories and additional 171 units Tonya Johnson Cobblestone resident 1 Murph , Joan From: Sent: To: Subject: Murphy, Joan Tuesday, June 14, 2016 8:10 AM Lovelace, Tom FW: Cobblestone Lake Senior Housing Complex From: Cody Smith [mailto:csmith@misoenergy.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 7:48 AM To: Murphy, Joan Subject: Cobblestone Lake Senior Housing Complex I live in the Cobblestone Lake neighborhood. We moved to this neighborhood because we loved the way it felt like the ideal neighborly community. All the houses were designed in a traditional , vintage American fashion, and it all revolved around the wonderful lake. I cannot imagine the proposed senior housing development fitting into the design and intent of the community as planned. Something further back off the lake, such as the current senior apartment building or the commercial space is fine. However, this structure will dominate the lake front and considerably change the atmosphere of the community. For this to fit, the height and profile must be minimized, it must be set back as far as possible, and the parks need to be in the original location on the lake front. There should be landscaping to separate the park and lake front areas from the housing complex. The last concern is with the number of employees and commercial traffic that this complex will bring. Underground parking would reduce this impact and allow the building to be parked back further from the lake. Cody Smith 15948 Cobblestone Lake Pkwy Apple Valley Murph Joan From: Sent: To: Subject: Murphy, Joan Friday, June 10, 2016 3:43 PM Lovelace, Tom FW: Proposed "PHS Cobblestone Lake Senior Housing Complex" From: Tracie Henkel [mailto:traciehenkel@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 3:38 PM To: Murphy, Joan Subject: Proposed "PHS Cobblestone Lake Senior Housing Complex" Dear Planning Commission Members: I learned that Presbyterian Homes submitted plans for your review for a 5 -story Continuum of Care Complex that would be located on the west end of Cobblestone Lake. Although I have only positive thoughts about services offered at other Presbyterian Homes locations, I do not favor this proposal for two reasons: the proposed 4 or 5 -story complex would tower over all existing structures and it would be a significant departure from the original plan for the location of a park on the west end of the lake. I moved to the Cobblestone Lake neighborhood three years ago specifically because of the beautiful city park and walking paths around Cobblestone Lake. The lake creates a wonderful sense of community where I meet and visit with other dedicated dog owners who walk the paths multiple times a day -- especially at sunrise and sunset to take in the amazing colors reflected on the lake. The beautiful park also draws in my friends from Rosemount and other parts of Apple Valley. Besides people using the paths, young and old people fish on the lake year-round, adding to the sense of a valued community gathering place. Of course a care facility would be a great addition to Apple Valley; however, the proposed facility is simply too large and moves the park off to the north, changing the planned vista of green space. I urge the Planning Commission to consider the wishes of the people who currently reside in the neighborhood and bought their homes with views of the lake in mind. I hope the developer will find an alternative plan that will better satisfy the needs and desires of the entire community. Sincerely, Tracie Henkel Dunberry Way Apple Valley, MN 1 Murphy, Joan From: Sent: To: Subject: Murphy, Joan Friday, June 10, 2016 3:30 PM Lovelace, Tom FW: Presbyterian Home Proposal Original Message From: Paula Finkelstein [mailto:pjf2123@icloud.com] Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 3:29 PM To: Murphy, Joan Subject: Presbyterian Home Proposal As residents of the Cobblestone Lake Neighborhood we would like to state our opposition and dismay with the proposed change in plans for the new Presbyterian Home. I found the last discussed change from 3 to 4 stories uncomfortable from an esthetic standpoint. Now to hear that a 5 story structure has been proposed is of serious concern to us and frankly unacceptable. It will be unsightly in its new location (moved to center stage) and totally dwarf the rest of the neighborhood. This building as it is proposed will not be an enhancement to our community ; it will devour it. We are extremely supportive of having a seniors facility in our community. It will enrich and diversify our neighborhood. Please keep the structure as initially proposed at 3 stories. It ultimately will be in the best interest of all concerned parties. Sincerely, Paula and Bert Finkelstein 15584 Dunberry Way Apple Valley man 55124 Sent from my iPad Murphy, Joan From: Sent: To: Subject: Murphy, Joan Friday, June 10, 2016 2:48 PM Lovelace, Tom FW: Cobblestone Lake Presbyterian Homes Development Original Message From: Jenny [mailto:jenny@planepretty.com] Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 2:47 PM To: Murphy, Joan Subject: Cobblestone Lake Presbyterian Homes Development Hi there, I just wanted to take a moment to express my concerns about the new housing development being planned by Presbyterian Homes in Cobblestone Lake. The idea of a 4 story building was already extremely hard to stomach, but I just heard they are proposing a change to 5 stories! For those of us who own homes in this community, the idea of having our nice sunset lake view being blocked by a tall residential building is extremely upsetting. I hope the city will really think about the current residents of Cobblestone Lake when making this decision. I think this will severely impact the quality and desirability of our neighborhood. I understand the need for senior housing, but it shouldn't come at a cost to others in the community. Thank you for your time and please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jennifer Winward Murphy, Joan From: Sent: To: Subject: Murphy, Joan Thursday, June 09, 2016 2:03 PM Lovelace, Tom FW: PHS Cobblestone Lake Senior Housing Development: Feedback From: Jon Laqua [mailto:laqua.jon@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2016 1:57 PM To: Grawe, Charles; Murphy, Joan Subject: PHS Cobblestone Lake Senior Housing Development: Feedback Mayor Hamann -Roland and Mr. Tom Lovelace, I'm writing in regards to the proposed PHS Cobblestone Lake Senior Housing Development project within the Cobblestone Lake development. As residents of the neighborhood, my wife and I have three concerns about the revised plans recently submitted to the Planning Commission. What drew us to Cobblestone Lake (ultimately becoming the deciding factor in our moving here) was the neighborhood's character. The architecture, the houses with porches in the front and garages in the back, and of course the lake which we walk around every day. The overall design of the neighborhood demonstrates a vision that makes Cobblestone Lake a highly desirable place to call home. My wife and I attended the Senior Housing Development project's public hearing on April 19th and were pleased to learn about the plans for senior housing to be added to the neighborhood. The idea of senior housing was met with enthusiasm by those at the meeting. There was even interest from several attendees who inquired about a potential waiting list for the facility. But the consensus was that the (at that time) four story proposal was too large, and was met with 100% apprehension. We now see that the recently submitted revised plan is a story higher, making the building five stories. Walking around the lake would mean walking in the shadow of this mega -structure. It would be the focal point of the lake, blocking the amazing sunsets we see today. You couldn't help but feel small when walking around the lake. At 92' 6" above the lake this building is far too tall for the neighborhood. From the lake you would look up at a 9+ story behemoth above you, blocking out the sun. Even at 85' 6" (the original four story design) the building would be too large, towering 8 1/2 stories above the lake. To be blunt, this proposed structure would not only dominate the lake shore; it would conflict with the neighborhood's character. Second, based on the drawings submitted the building looks nothing like the existing architecture in Cobblestone Lake. All existing buildings (single family homes, townhomes, higher density townhomes and amenities) have a look, feel and color palette which this building completely contradicts. Considering it's proximity to the lake and the surrounding neighborhoods it should look like it belongs in the neighborhood; like it was planned to be there from day one. The current design instead looks like just another run-of-the-mill sprawling apartment complex, plopped down with no regard for the surrounding environment. Again, being blunt, this design doesn't match its surrounding environment at all. It just doesn't fit. And finally, the need to re -zone and move the planned community park will impact the feel of the neighborhood. That park was meant to be a welcoming invitation to Cobblestone Lake from the shopping area, inviting the public to enjoy the lake and amenities. Shuffling the park off to the side makes it nothing more than an after -thought while the massive building walls off the lake. As designed this project demands too many compromises and does too much damage to the neighborhood. Patti and I implore you to stay true to the Cobblestone Lake vision and wait for a design that demonstrates a situational awareness while complementing the Cobblestone Lake development. Perhaps a little "thinking outside the box" is required in this situation. Because if done right, the addition of senior housing would be the finishing touch for Cobblestone Lake, the crown jewel if you will, making Cobblestone Lake even more desirable than it is today. Respectfully, Jon and Patti Laqua 15641 Cobblestone Lake Parkway Apple Valley, MN 55124 2 Murph , Joan From: Sent: To: Subject: Murphy, Joan Thursday, June 09, 2016 10:02 AM Lovelace, Tom; Nordquist, Bruce FW: PHS COBBLESTONE LAKE SENIOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL From: Cynthia Falkowski [mailto:cynthiafalkowski@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2016 10:00 AM To: Murphy, Joan Subject: PHS COBBLESTONE LAKE SENIOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL TO THE ATTENTION OF: Bruce Nordquist : Community Development Director Tom Lovelace: City Planner Apple Valley Planning Commision: Tom Melander Tim Burke David Schindler Ken Alwin Keith Diekmann Angela Polozun Paul Scanlan As residents of The Harbor At Cobblestone Lake South Shore Homeowners Association, we submit the following in regard to your June est Planning Commission meeting for the rezoning/replat of the existing outlots, for the the purpose of expanding the scope of the proposed Presbyterian Housing project: Tradition Development developed and successfully marketed the Cobblestone Lake community in the manner detailed in the brochure to be found at the following website: http://www.cobblestonelake.comilifestyle.asp Following are a few key notes from the above noted brochure: Cobblestone Lake offers the nostalgia and stability of old-fashioned traditional neighborhoods. Take a stroll down the sidewalks, through the neighborhoods and see the attention given to detail. With front porches on every home and a streetscape that is painted with landscaping, your walk will through the neighborhood will be one reminiscent of yesteryear. Cobblestone Lake has set itself apart from any other new neighborhood through its careful design, construction and attention detail all of which is evident as you make your way through the neighborhood and down to the lake or any one of the other multiple amenities. The neighborhood surrounds the centerpiece lake which is also completely encompassed by parks and dual lighted trails and pathways so everyone can enjoy the setting. 1 The future will also include additional amenities as plans are currently being developed which will complete the parks and trails system within the community. Future parks will include the addition of a picnic shelter, complete with site furniture, grills, landscaping and restroom facility. Our particular Association consists primarily, if not exclusively, of empty -nesters who downsized to smaller high-quality homes, specifically choosing Cobblestone Lake for reasons outlined by Tradition. The park area on the west end of the lake has been promised to include the facilities detailed above, and has been illustrated on every drawing from the earliest conception of this development. We have asked numerous times when it would be completed, each time being reassured that as the economy improved, it would be brought to fruition. Now that the lake lots have been sold, boasting beautiful new homes, we all assumed the remaining park would soon be completed, as promised. The introduction of the proposed Presbyterian Home project was acceptable as originally presented three stories, to be located on either side of the park. However, to expand the structure(s) to cover the west end of the lake, and construct it as a looming 5 -story building, will completely re -shape and re -define the whole of Cobblestone Lake and its neighborhoods. Such an imposing presence will destroy the atmosphere we treasure and enjoy daily as the biking and walking paths are constantly in use. I'm wondering if you have walked the paths of Cobblestone, complete with its parks, gazebo, beautiful dock, the wide variety of tasteful and interesting homes, canoe stations and more. This is indeed the concept as presented by Tradition Development, which has successfully fostered a unique blend of residents, each of which purchased in Cobblestone because of these offerings. You cannot have an entire community built on the promises put forth to each of us in the cited brochure, then change the plan once residential portion has effectively built out. To place a 5 -story, massive building on a small lake with 2 -story homes will not only look ridiculous, but almost certainly have a negative impact on the value of our homes. In closing, we strongly oppose any 5 -story structure on the shores of Cobblestone Lake, let alone one which will be located where we have all been promised a large park and the accompanying park amenities. A hard -copy of this correspondence will also be delivered to the Apple Valley City Hall. Thank you for your attention in this matter. Jon and Cynthia Falkowski - 15841 Eastbend Way Dennis and Kathy Hansen - 15829 Eastbend Way Lynn and BernaDene Reimer - 15849 Eastbend Way Dan and Jann Cotroneo - 15857 Eastbend Way Luther and Libby Hagen - 15843 Cobblestone Lake Parkway John and Nancy Varpness 15851 Cobblestone Lake Parkway Robert and Kathleen Kachman - 15859 Cobblestone Lake Parkway Les and Cyndy Martisko - 15867 Cobblestone Lake Parkway 2 Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 USC, 2510-2521. It is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may include confidential and legally privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. 3 Mark Raas <pmraas©gmail.com> Gmail PHS Cobblestone Lake Senior Housing Complex PHS Cobbles Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 2:16 PM CT) C 03 -0 C .-- .-. 03 CO a.) co cL c X 0 (13 E c a) GQ. CD E ...,. 0 03 7D- 0 03 0 .....1 t'' (Da) > To c -o ▪ '6 o o) 2 5 c co; co c 0 > ..o 0 0) (0 0.c ..c :6 03 • 1-6 -0 (I)(1) ,-: 'C -c W 4.... C C r3 0 0 o 0...c ., 4..c. c D --.:-; ....‘e a) D. 04- -0 co E ` c o a) T ..chs co o x a) ,.... (0 0 0= a) cu E c E •___ :0 c7) eL c .c roa) o o 2 Tu :.E3_ =.a > 0 E .c == 46 a 0) -0 c E (0 •- E O 0 D1)- 0 .= N a -0 s-. - (0 _0 46 -r, E a) 76 a) c a) H -0 .... p C CT ,--- a) ' l0 0 ii o co P. co • a.) c cn E ° .c E -c o a) -(1-) 0, -- E - a) E c a) L.. Tii 0 -ci..,c 0- 'Fii (0 2 E E 0 0 0) • •- co a) = 'El a) la = •.... ....c a) _ •- c co 0.• — -0: o *6 ...c E ..,.....f. 0 fp. TD- (13 C 0 a..., a) 49 ,.... (0• (1) _ , 4-' 0 C >, 5 6‘ a) 0.) o I-- .....-- ,.... o 9•• co i >., a) 0 17.4 ibi -t-ii 4-., c a) o ci..) (1) °03 4-‘ >, al 0°) C LI - CU 0,.) .-E c . e a) (1)0 557 , *-‹ g.) 6 C co " to c • E ...c --o c >-, ,.... 0. -0 > = 0 cu a) /1 a) 0 a) a) 0 a) 0 11) .-, z -..c - .s, ca 1) co To E -o co • (0 = :.-- u) o cl O 45 5 (.0 — _a ,.... a) ( 00) -Y. o ' „f.,> a, " o ocu II ,..... .... 03 a 0 E o- a) co c -0 , 0 — 0 0) a) ..c , la a) o a) 2 -6 (1) (1)©a) :.-- ..c cu • 42 2 a) :Y c) ct$ E a) a) 0 _c a) = .0 = E D P.,-,. 0 4- -LI -cl --o P 7:, o ,- . E .45 0) 0 0 co (1) 0 § --N- o .c c o 4- o (U 'V -5 =-- (i) D ✓ E ,--• .c a) 0) 0 c T..; co 6• ,.--- a) c\i 0) .c O. ...c ft 1- 2 i— co ro E • 0- f.2 a co ea W c ..se. 6/14/2016 R.09 PM Murph Joan From: Sent: To: Subject: Court Winjum <courtneyroy0l@gmail.com> Wednesday, June 15, 2016 3:20 PM Murphy, Joan Cobblestone Lake Presbyterian Homes Proposed Building To the Apple Valley Planning Commission: Our family recently moved to the Cobblestone development and selected our home based on many facets with the unimpeded views being an important aspect. When we did our second walk through, we left later in the evening and the sunset view sold us on the property. Now we realized there was still more area to develop but at the time there were no announced plans to put a building twice the size of a Super Target directly in line with the sightless of the lake and the sunset. While there has been some recent correspondence regarding the development and the planning commission meetings, there is still much to learn from both a positive and negative perspective. While I am steadfastly against the idea of losing the aesthetics of the lake by this company, I feel most of the neighborhood is not aware enough of what this project means to our community, pros & cons. I do not feel due diligence has been done for those that live in this community and have been paying the taxes, in some cases, since the onset of the project. I hope you will consider my plea to allow for more time for us to get educated and organized. Respectfully, Court Winjum Court Winjum Chianti Grill Director of Operations Burnsville (952) 892-7555 Roseville (651) 644-2808 Cell: (651) 387-1810 E Mail: courtwinjum@chiantigrill.com URL: www.chiantigrill.com 1 Murphy, Joan From: Sent: To: Subject: Glennis Schlukebier <grannie.gfs.49@gmail.com> Wednesday, June 15, 2016 5:49 PM Murphy, Joan RE: Proposed Presbyterian Homes project at Cobblestone Lake Dear Planning Commission, City Council and Mayor Mary, It is with great respect for Presbyterian Homes senior campuses with continuum of care services that we need to add our voices, as residents of Cobblestone Lake South Townhomes, to please vote to reject the current proposal being presented tonight. And we have nothing against Presbyterian Homes in general. In fact a grandparent was a resident at Lake Johanna, and another elderly friend happily resides in their care in Inver Grove Heights. Unfortunately, due to a hospitalization, we will not be able to attend tonight's meeting. And although this will probably not be read before the meeting it is still important to say: It is not about the sunsets or the altered western horizon, to us, but it is about the way too large and overwhelming shadow it will cast on the neighborhood dwarfing the surrounding homes and lake. We realize that Traditions is eager to unload these parcels of land and that, perhaps, the over -reaching arm of the Metropolitan is also adding pressure to accept this proposal, and special funding is at stake, but we say 'Whoa up!' Is this the right place at the right time for this project? If it has to be, could it be partially adjusted to the parcel on the south side of Cobblestone Lake Parkway and north of 160th Street? Could Presbyterian Homes build some of their lovely townhouses at the end of the lake? Could there still be more room for the previously planned park at the western end of the lake? Could another neighborhood swimming pool be included in the overall site plans (to replace the much too small existing community pool)? Perhaps Traditions could then demolish the existing pool and offer the land for another couple higher end single family homes. We have only been residents of this neighborhood for three years and our views have altered drastically since purchasing with the addition of a section of Pulte homes, so again, it is not about the view. It is about the scope and what kind of project is a good fit for this neighborhood. We personally have had visions of a nicer restaurant or two, like Porter Creek, Houlihan's or Jake's, with outdoor patios on the end of the lake. There has to be some better plan that would provide a buffer between the businesses and homes that will not overwhelm the lake and neighborhood. Thank you so much for reading and considering the thoughts and views of your taxpaying homeowners in the Cobblestone Lake neighborhood. Most sincerely, William and Glennis Schlukebier 15869 Eastbend Way Apple Valley, MN 55124 Sent from my iPhone